And I just wanna thank him. He's gone
through a lot, what they're doing to him.
And these people are gonna be caught, and
they they're gonna be caught, and they're gonna
be prosecuted.
And from what they tell me, I see
this just by watching your programs
and reading the news, but from what they
tell me, they could get twenty years in
jail, and they'll get it. I'll tell you.
There's gonna be no leniency and there'll be
no pardons. I can tell you that right
now.
Twenty years in jail and then maybe they
get you said this morning, twenty years in
jail and then maybe they'll go to one
of these prisons in El Salvador. Do you
think with the way that the judges have
been issuing injunctions,
it would be easier or harder to send
these Tesla domestic terrorists
to a jail in El Salvador than these
MS thirteen or Trende Arrival guys. Well, I
view these people as terrorists just like,
others. These are when I looked at those,
showrooms burning
and those cars, not one or two of,
like, seven, eight, 10 burning, exploding all over
the place. These are terrorists.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last twenty four hours.
Yeah. Yes. This is StreamYard. Thursday,
April third twenty twenty five. Thank you for
joining me today. This ongoing joke that I
just can't seem to get to StreamYard settings,
and maybe it's just not me. But thank
you for joining me today. For those in
the podcast, it seem probably hearing that every
show these days. Weird thing just I can't
seem to get a handle on it when
the screens after the opening.
Laugh at Ryan today. But I have a
a short show today only because I have
a limited amount of time. I told you
I was gonna be doing, you know, trying
to keep regular work going throughout this process.
But those that don't know, the third eye
carnival starts on the fourth tomorrow.
Steve and and Thiess are gonna be coming
to basically connect with me here at the
studio for us to kind of just kinda
play music, and and I guess Thiess is
gonna be filming for his upcoming documentary.
The point is I have a limited time,
so I'm gonna get right into it, maybe
less than an hour. As soon as I
hear from them, ultimately, I'm gonna jump off.
So I wanted to cover a couple of
things. This is really mostly a follow-up to
the ongoing point that I I'm finding difficult
to not see as literally the most important
thing happening to Americans
right now. I I it's and I'm not
trying to make this a partisan thing. It's
not because it's my opinion. If we understand
the foundational importance of our constitutional rights as
it pertains to living in the state of
society that we call The United States and
how important that has been, just the first
amendment, but even just the constitution in general,
it's insane to watch how quickly this is
happening and how we're watching Americans either because
they don't understand, because they're misinformed,
or because they genuinely don't care if it
applies to something they don't like. And we're
watching these things drip just diminish in front
of us. Now to be clear, they're not
something that can be taken away by the
government. They are inherent, god given, inalienable rights
that they existed whether or not they wrote
them down on that piece of paper, hemp
constitution piece of paper. The point is that
they pretend that's the case today. They can
turn it off when they decide. National security,
for example. If you understand what inherent god
given and inalienable means, then national security or
anything else would not change that reality. So
I wanted to follow-up on some points that
I think are monumental,
and And it's gonna be reiterating one that
I'm gonna keep making until it seems that
most people are aware of how obvious this
is. But a couple overlapping points and one
of the most concerning is the, I mean,
this rapidly evolving
awareness of how obviously Israel is
influencing, infiltrating, if not completely controlling US policy.
And this should not be a
contentious point. It shouldn't be about racism. It
shouldn't be about anything other than governments manipulating
policy, which we all know they do. So
I wanna play a few things that I
think are very important in that regard. But
what quickly before we get into it, just
in case you're interested, thirdeyecarnival.com,
the the event from fourth to the sixth
is gonna be fun. And I guess there's
gonna appears to be some rain, but tomorrow,
which will be the birthday party overlap, appears
to be completely sunny. Beautiful day. The other
days may be a little bit rainy, but
we're gonna have fun either way. So I
hope to see you guys there. I'll be
there with the RV doing interviews inside and
out, and just a lot of great things
happening there. But just to jump right in,
guys, because we definitely have
and that was just me, we definitely have,
some limited time today, which is hard for
me, and you know that. So main point
to start generally that I'm gonna reiterate.
And this is important for I even think
half our audience may not really grasp how
important this is. Trump deportations revealed to be
full of innocent people,
legal
immigrants with no criminal record. Now this game
has been played where they're trying to act
like the media and and, get understand, the
media, all sides of it, are always trying
to lie to you and can manipulate you.
So too are politicians.
Vance, for example, lying continually about this one
they claim as a leader of MS thirteen
that we can literally prove is not even
the evidence they're pointing to shows that they're
wrong about that. That's how crazy this all
is right now. But the manipulation is they're
acting like the media or these dumb Democrats
are just lying and saying, because they are
in many cases, that they're no they're not
criminals. They're innocent people even though to be
fair,
when they're illegally here, you can't say that.
That but within that conversation, we as we've
already proven, they should obviously, based on our
constitutional rights, the Supreme Court ruling, the roundly
upheld reality that even illegal immigrants have deep
have rights due process,
constitutional rights. That is the fact regardless of
the screaming partisans out there. Easily proven.
So that even within that conversation, they still
were they not given due process.
The point, though, hopefully, everyone can wrap their
minds around this, there are also people who
were simply
they were legally in this country.
For example, Khalil is an obvious example of
somebody they just make up arguments about that
we can prove weren't true. That was and
that's not even the case we're making today.
That was the first one. He's legally in
this country with a green card. Broke no
rules, no laws, and ultimately and had no
criminal record and was simply removed. But after
that, they went into the overlap with Venezuela.
And, yes, some of them, I guess, I
I guess, were told because I still have
yet to see anybody proven, anyone, to actually
be and like I said, I wouldn't dispute
that there's probably gang members in there, but
I have yet to see it proven that
anybody of them were, which is kinda wild
when you think about it, even though, like,
so likely some of them are. The point
is we can prove many of them were
not, and then many of them who were
still legally in this country. Not illegal aliens
who just also didn't break the law in
other ways. Legally in this country. Some with
green cards, some with asylum, some in the
process of going through asylum. It's a whole
bunch of them. And they were arrested and
some deported to El Salvador, others still in
custody. It's absolutely wild. And I get back
and forth with people online right now, some
probably bots, acting like that's just not true.
And you can prove it in court documents.
You can prove it in every possible way
right now. And yet, you still get Trump
and Vance and the rest just lying to
you. Elon Musk just lying to you. And
I think we can prove they know that
they're lying, and why wouldn't they? They're committed
to this, guys, and this is a huge
deal. Even Joe Rogan seems to be pulling
pulling away and going, that's insane. That's crazy.
That's horrifying. He just said that about El
Salvador.
But that's important to keep that in your
mind. Innocent people, in every possible way, legally
in the country, no criminal record, they and
even to their point of their own records,
that they weren't even charged with a crime.
They simply went to a Palestinian protest, which
they just now call terrorism. That's their own
information, guys. So before we get into all
that, I just wanna point a couple interesting
things out. I just thought that we're gonna
come back to this, obviously, as we we
will, as you I'm sure you know. That's
been one of my focuses for a while,
just artificial intelligence and technocracy.
We will cover this in a larger point,
but just so you don't miss it, an
AI model they're claiming has officially passed the
Turing the Turing test, which essentially means that
it you can't tell whether it's, you know,
it it it's the which the test is
decide whether or not it it,
how the most best way to frame it.
I'm not the expert on this, but the
point is that to see if, like, if
the computer decides that it's it's a a
machine, right, that it can that it can
tell that it's not a human. The test
is basically to see if it is equal
or beyond, like, human capacity and the machine
can't tell the difference as I understand it.
The point is simply about arguably reaching some
kind
of general artificial intelligence, like a sentient kind
of like this is now beyond just an
algorithm computer program.
So we've been worried about this. Whitney's talked
about it a lot. How do we know?
How why wouldn't they just pretend that and
just dump their information in our faces and
say that's what the AI says. So we'll
come back to that. It's gonna be important.
I promise you. Also, I just thought this
was worth laughing at and showing how ridiculous,
cartoonish, and broken our system is. Cory Booker
literally, I don't even know how I can
make sense of this, how I've I don't
even know how I believe this, but I'm
sure it was documented.
Apparently sets a record in the senate with
a twenty five hour speech. I mean, how
is that even possible?
Did he not have to go to the
bathroom?
Yes. This seems insane to me. How can
you possibly I I can speak for I've
had six plus hour shows. And I am
beat after that. I'm tired. I'm, you know,
hey. This guy for twenty five hours. How
can you possibly even say something of substance
for twenty five hours? That's just ridiculous. And,
obviously, it's a filibuster. It's meant to stop
something
it's dumb, guys. Our system is ridiculous, and
these people know that entirely. But the main
point to start overlapping the main show today
is about the point I started with and
the overlap to Israel, which is pretty much
your focus for a few shows now. I
think and like I said, whether Israel's involved
or not, which I think it's transparently clear
that it is, this is important to Americans
because your government is making drastically
like, moves that should shock everybody. Even if
you disagree even if you agree with that
we should be changing rights to you know,
that's even even though it's not possible, to,
you know, remove that make, you know, make
limited speech instead. Right? That kind of a
move. Which you could still point out how
how dramatic these moves are. Not even going
through the proper channels to achieve them. I
mean, to me, that's why it seems clear
this is about something else. But a lot
of conservatives and Republicans are calling this out.
This is just a turn Pam Bondi saying
justice is coming. And they're talking about effing
Teslas, guys. Now, yes, as I said, arson
combined with vandalism, the most extreme versions, cocktail
bombs and burning some cars, which I'm not
trying to diminish. That they should go to
jail for that. And that's that could literally
be twenty years. That's not bombastic at all.
But most of the rest, like 99% of
the others, are scratching cars or some other
vandalism. And they are including that in the
in they're saying they're all getting twenty years.
Now, maybe that's not what's gonna happen. My
point is this is even jarring Republicans. As
Ian Smith says, if you damage Teslas, we'll
find you and arrest you.
But if you f kids and you're a
politician, we'll redact everything and break campaign promises
to protect you.
See, people have lines, guys. People have integrity.
And this is crossing it in a lot
of ways, and they're just trying to keep
screaming over the top. They use their cat
turds and interaction Barbies to just pretend like
everything's on track.
People are pushing back. Here's Brooke Jackson, by
the way, and not not to include her
in the you know, I I I I
don't even know if she identifies as left
or right these days. I find her to
be very insightful and very intelligent and, you
know,
regardless of her political stance. I'm just saying
because I actually don't know. She's willing to
have all these conversations, and I find her
to be an important voice in a lot
of these conversations. The point is she's speaking
up from the corner of a medical freedom
side.
And here's Maga voice saying, holy s h
I t. Pam Bondi said there will be
no plea negotiations.
They should all receive twenty years minimum for
vandalizing Teslas. That's not a joke. That's what
they're saying. Meanwhile, letting everything else go by
the wayside.
And she says vandalize a car and the
system pounces, but flood the public with a
misbranded, adulterated, quote, vaccine that is injured and
killed who knows how many kids.
That's not a scandal. It's policy. And the
important part, ladies and gentlemen, Biden's and Trump's.
That's you know, people this is regardless of
like, we will all have different issues we
feel are more important or side more left
or right or whatever.
But if you have integrity, it always shows
through.
Now on that note, since I pointed to
her, I love Brooke Jackson. I wanna make
sure you see the, great interviews we did.
Again, don't forget, TLAB demonstrating our value. The
first person the first group to do an
interview a video interview with Brooke Jackson about
that huge story was the last American vagabond
myself personally. Brooke Jackson interview, this was 12/02/2021.
Pfizer whistleblower exposes cover up calling vaccine data
into question. Now British Medical Journal was the
first to put out, like, the written investigation.
But Brooke and I went back for a
month and a half going back about how
the you know, because this was her first
important interview.
I just think that I'm I was honored
to do that. I just think it's interesting
how we can that's the kind of stuff
that we can put out and yet we're
still regarded by most circles as, you know,
you know how the game goes. We're not
allowed to be something more, but that not
like we care about that. I think we're
changing people's lives by doing this the right
way, and I will always on that side.
Brooke Jackson, February eleventh twenty twenty two. Pfizer
reveals concerns with that integrity vindicating previous claims,
and these are airtight, guys. From the first
interview to the second, incredible. Even to the
third, even more so. She has all the
receipts. They're straight up lying, but look. That's
where we are today too. Trump, everybody else
still supporting these guys. Trump and Biden, by
the way. This was the last one on
07/29/2023.
Pfizer trial reveals big pharma includes FDA CDC
seen as too big to fail.
Now Justin Amash, in regard to the kind
of left right paradigm lie or the idea
of the woke left and woke right, which
let's see. This let's make a point about
this, guys. It's not a game. This is
not accusing them of that, you know, back
and forth like it's a petty thing. It
is about I it's about specific fundamental things.
Right? If you are using identity politics, if
you are calling for censorship based on hate
speech, right, if you I mean, it's it's
all very simple. You're you're you're leaning into
the same kind of ideas. You know, when
you're seeing cat turds scream about people going
to prison because they scratch a Tesla, that's
that's the woke right. If you see them
asking to censor somebody because they're screaming about
Israel, you know, about whatever, really, anything. In
this case, it's about pro, you know, free
free Palestine.
Kick them out of the country. That's the
woke right. Same thing the woke left was
doing when they were screaming about you saying
pronouns or anything else. It's, in principle, the
same, just like the title in regard to
deporting people from this country who have constitutional
rights. Green card, visa holder, American citizen, in
principle, it is the same thing, guys. The
legal reality is the same.
Justin Amash says, if you recognize that politics
is full of liars but consistently fall for
lies from your own, quote, team, then you
are the mark, The intended target of the
long con being staged by those in power.
God. If we can only just all understand
that. Now this is interesting. As you well
know, I've got a lot of negative things
to say about,
now I'm now just blanking on his name
all of a sudden.
That's crazy.
Give me in the chat what his name
is. I can't believe I'm forgetting his name.
He's, you know, prominent for the most part
in in his conversation.
I just think he you know, I'm very
suspicious about a lot of the ways he
presents information. That's not the point, though. As
always, and we demonstrate this regularly,
it's not about the person, guys. Obviously, it
matters who says something. You know? You consider
maybe they have an an intentions to but
the truth is the truth regardless of who
puts it forward. Always consider whether they may
be using the truth. Right? That's what a
lot of dishonest people do. It doesn't change
the truth is the truth. What happens is
people push back on the content because of
who's presenting it. It should be the other
way around. Right?
Fuentes. Thank you. Nick Fuentes for the podcast.
So here's what he says. I just think
it's important to hear
this is exactly what I think is going
on, and I think it's important to hear
this from a person that's really tapped into
the partisan field but seems to be able
to see the larger picture in regard to
how it's being played. Now maybe as you
get using that for his own benefit for
something else. You can decide. The content is
the point here.
Tracking
everybody that criticizes Israel,
everybody that interacts with somebody that's criticizing Israel,
and whether you're on a visa or not,
whether you're a citizen or not, whether you're
brown or not, Christian or Muslim, they're putting
you in the Palantir database. They're putting you
on the enemy's list.
You don't see a problem with that?
A Muslim is being deported for criticizing Israel,
and people go,
that's fine. I'm gonna support that enthusiastically because
I'm not a Muslim on a visa.
Okay. So do you not see where this
is gonna go?
Surely,
certainly,
law enforcement and surveillance tools that were created
to spy on Muslims
have never been used against right wingers. That's
never happened. Right. You're telling me
that law enforcement and the intelligence
agencies
are going to bypass the constitution
and infringe on the civil liberties of Muslims
in the name of terrorism,
and you think they might eventually use that
against right wing extremists?
That's preposterous.
That has never happened before.
Oh, yeah. Except that's exactly what happened after
January 6. That's exactly what happened during COVID.
That's exactly what happened after Trump got elected
the first time.
Right.
It's very simple. I you could also add
the trigger convoy. Right? It's the same point
I make every damn time. How is it
possible I mean and I know a lot
of them are just dishonest who are there
for their own benefit, and that's all sides
of the paradigm. But there's a lot of
honest conservatives that are being tricked by a
lot of this stuff, just like a lot
of honest liberals in the same conversation in
COVID, for example. The point is that we
already know how this works. You're applying the
same broken you know, using the same
justification
to go after people for something for an
association, like a red hat, for example. Right?
They're using this, and it will be turned
against anybody who's against the power structure. I
mean, it's just insane people but this I
guess, this is why I think a lot
of these larger people are starting to call
it out because maybe they maybe they were
uncomfortable calling it out, but I think they're
just becoming very clear. It's becoming clear that
this is not in your interest. For those
that genuinely want best for this country, even
if it goes against their partisan group, will
eventually stand up because because that's what they
truly care about. Right? Here is Khaleesi pointing
out another clip from Jeffrey Sachs. Just recognizing,
guys, why I, but I think it's very
proven, think this is happening.
Israel is very clear. I mean, let's be
clear again. They're telling you that's what this
is about. It's because people are speaking out
about Israel. You can't be you can't say
bad. I mean, Stefanik literally said, you can't
say things bad about Israel. On top of
that, they're calling everybody anti Semite that speaks
about freeing Palestine.
It's it's obvious, and they're telling you that.
So we can prove and say out loud,
Israel is why this is happening.
So understand that and then recognize how much
of this policy is connected through this very
same
broken logic. Israel runs the US government, runs
the White House. They're run by Israel. They're
serving Israel. They're doing this for Israel, and
that means that The United States is in
war in places it shouldn't be in. No.
We should not be in war in Yemen,
for heaven's sake. We shouldn't be in war
in Syria. And don't forget, Israel just spoke
up all all salty about the fact that
the signal chat thing, which I still think
was completely contrived personally,
that their intelligence that they gave The United
States to go after Yemen, by the way
that which ended up resulted in them bombing
a building full of innocent people. Right? But
you could argue they just did that to
The US, and they're just too stupid to
know or they were okay with it. Who
knows? The point is it was very clearly
now shown. That was Israel's objective, guys.
Literally are fighting Israel's wars, and we know
this if we're not blinded by partisanship or,
I I guess, care about Zionism more than
your own country. In
Libya, in Lebanon,
we're in war in all of these places.
We have a a group, amateur hour, in
the White House deciding
where to bomb, but they're doing it for
Israel's behest. Amateur hour indeed. American interest of
American security. Not only is it amateur hour,
not only is it
Israel hour nonstop,
but it's as if we have,
essentially, one person rule.
Now amateur hour, I agree with because I
think a lot of these people are picked
because they're not bright enough. They didn't realize
they're being used. And that's not a knock
on left or right, guys. The same damn
thing I mean, look at Biden for crying
out loud. That's why I think the people
are in place. Right now, though, I think
you got a lot of people in this
is the way I see most of this
happening. I think more than ever today, we
have people that are either willfully ignorant about
the fact that they're being used, what you
know, then choose to either they don't wanna
acknowledge it or whatever, but they're not really
conscious of it. They're they're kind of avoiding
even looking at that area that might show
with that, or people that just simply do
not know. Because they don't they don't even
recognize because they're more opportunists. They're just jumping
at whatever makes them money. The point is
I don't think a lot of people even
know that they're being used. That's this it's
this horrifying
social media ecosystem that's just kind of a
blob right now. And so I think a
lot of in the politics too. I mean,
you look at the rest of these people
from a KJP to a Levitt or whatever,
and I just think a lot of these
people don't even are either so, like, tied
into their own political line that they just
don't care or they just don't even know.
That's my personal opinion, but a lot of
them are amateur hour, I think. People chosen
for that reason. But here's the Hodge twins
saying the new gaslight is, and this is
hilarious to me where we are, you're woke
leftist if you don't support Israel. I mean,
think about how insane this is now. It's
just what is woke and and and leftist
about wanting to put America First? Like, the
point is the term, it's like antisemitism. They
throw at anything that they don't want you
to look at or that they wanna shot
you know, anything about Israel, even though half
the time it contradicts itself. Right? This is
the the larger point about Israel saying that
this everything we do represents all the Jews,
and then you do something and if you
were to say hypothetically, well, the Jews just
did that, they'd call you racist.
It's like, well, isn't that what you just
keep telling us that this is what the
point is that's why I recognize that Zionism
is the plot in there. Either way you
go in that false narrative, you fall into
a trap. It's pretty well crafted if you
look at it, even though they're clumsy with
their propaganda. But so now you're literally calling
people in this country woke left or, like,
the right is attacking their own and calling
them a woke left because they won't
first support Israel
while screaming America First.
And this is a clip that we already
showed you that where Israel and Friedman bragging
about how they can control US speech. Pretty
common today.
But this is where you get the woke
left, woke right. It's it's not about left
and right, guys. That's the whole point of
the woke left, woke right
dynamic. I know there's a lot of people,
as I'll show you in a second, trying
to use it in order to muddy the
waters. That's how this works. As we've talked
about in the past, the terms regime change,
for example, or any number of other things
were that used to be a fake news
thing until they just said, oh, well, it's
real, but now it's because it's a good
thing. Regime change for democracy. That I mean,
you said that back in the seventies, '8
people would that's insane because it's not
it was something that was surreptitious.
Regime change was a was a secret thing
that nope. But now they say make a
difference. So when I say it and you
say it, we're thinking about different things even
though we're saying the same term. That it
it's just it muddies the waters. In this
case, it is all about the let's even
remove the woke from it. That's just so
we can attach the idea to it. It's
about people who are censoring Americans for
speech. You know? Because it's you can't say
any you can't say you can't have anti
this or anti that. Anti Israel, anti trans.
It's the same point. You're allowed to be
anti or anything you want or for anything
you want. You can say and think whatever
you want.
You can't act in a way that will
be a criminal act.
So here,
Meghan McCain,
yesterday,
says you can tell who the woke right
and the woke left are because they're both
antisemitic.
But look at how lazy that is. Like,
doesn't that just show you the whole thing?
How in the world you could say, well,
that they're they're now both woke because they
are racist? But isn't the whole point of
the woke thing that they're super against all
of that? It just doesn't make any sense.
It's all because this is for Israel. They're
trying to
just like Netanyahu standing up and saying, now
we're fighting the deep state, and it's only
the just to try to glom on to
the same narrative because they're failing in public
in in the public mind whether or not
the power structures don't care what you think
and keep going. I just think that's crazy
to me.
And I said, this is insane. Everything means
nothing. Nothing means everything. Welcome to 2025.
Now Michael Tracy, Josh pointed to Josh Hawley,
one of these kinda just cartoonishly
childish
and part and, like, one-sided people in congress,
says the president of Yale was, by ear
was by earlier today and couldn't name a
single concrete policy Yale's implemented to keep Jewish
students safe on campus. You mean aside from
literally all the things they have that keep
everybody safe on campus? Like, so you know
what you're demanding is specific things that keep
specifically Jews safer than everybody else? Why does
that make sense? They have policies right now
against violence, against that's the point. So when
they make that case, he frames it like
this and goes, they can't name a single
thing because they are clearly doing this for
an agenda.
It's it's it's wild. And so Michael Tracy
says, it will never stop being fun. Oh,
don't forget, by the way, the claim of
all these people being attacked has been disproven
a thousand ways over, even from the corporate
media in many ways. The name the 400%
antisemitism thing they've cited, that's from ADL, making
everything Palestinian
antisemitic. That's really what it is. They were
caught. Michael Tracy says it will never stop
being funny how Republicans and their media adjuncts
made a living for a decade viciously mocking
snowflakes
and safetyism
on their college campuses. Right? Ben Shapiro famously
saying, facts don't care about your feelings. We
can't do this. Now he's literally doing that.
Only to adopt that exact same emotional manipulation
framework to crush criticism of US foreign policy
in Israel.
These are the bro flakes, as Steve coined.
And now just on another side note, speaking
of bro flakes, you I and this is
not in any support of this person or
even the concept of the Tesla attacks. But
it's crazy to know that this person was
kicked off Twitter, which I can't believe I
didn't see, simply because he put out a
a post that said, kill Tesla, save the
country. Now if you read the post, which
is right here, he's not in any way
talking he's talking about takedown the company because
they think the company is seeding his plans
for fascism.
Now whatever you think about that, there's a
logical point to make about the money flowing
through this and all the overlap of his
conflicts of interest and how that money's being
used to bribe people to go after judges,
for example, which we will talk about at
some point.
So you so you can't come out and
say, now go after this company even if
you use the word kill? If I came
out and said kill Google, would they censor
me on Twitter? So this is a personal
attack against one person because they're lumping it
into they're all they're going after Tesla. Even
though, basically, right now, I don't see any
real evidence that shows they have any proof
of who is some coordinated thing. Even though
it wouldn't surprise me if it was happening.
Just think about that. So, again, showing you
his childish, petty, personal act and but yet
still the free speech warrior?
Does anybody still believe that that's not that's
honest?
Now but here's what here's Alex Jones talking
about. Because don't forget, when real things are
happening, he pivots into very specific things. Just
like Elon Musk,
the Democrat deep state's plan to launch a
terrorist backed civil war this summer exposed by
former DIA expert. Oh, you mean, like, the
17 times you told us that was gonna
happen before the selection that didn't happen? And
you swore up and down it was coming
and you approved it and here's documents? Well,
guess what? Now maybe it happened, it was
gonna happen, and they shifted. Certainly possible. My
point is this is kind of ridiculous that
every time we get to a point where
real things start to happen, they lurch into
something about pedophiles or Muslims or Europe or
all of which have some importance to talk
about.
I'd love to see something that actually has
any evidence to talk about a civil war
backed you know, the the the game guys,
the reality is they're all on the same
side. Your government is using people like him,
if probably a part of it, or this
game of left and right to keep you
distracted as they literally build the prison around
you.
The Democrats' deep state? Like, again, how dumb
it is to argue that one part of
the government is deep state? You can't recognize
how if it was a deep state, they
would go after the power structure? Not some
of it? It's just it's so stupid. But
people fall for it.
Now Randy Farren, by the way, to show
you the Zionist overlap we already talked about
this the last show. This guy is a
monster, and I went over, like,
s I mean, seven seas included a bunch
more, but I think, like, two or three
very clear examples of him calling for the
death of children, calling to bomb more people's
eyes because they happen to have a pager.
This guy is a rapid Zionist and straight
up anti American if you look at what
he's actually doing.
And here's what's this hilarious point. APAC, apparently,
this monster just won in Florida,
which, again, you know my opinion. I don't
I don't think that your voice truly translate,
guys, at at least at the presidential level.
And I think it's important to recognize that
that's what we're dealing with in a larger
scale, especially since APAC can straight up bribe
people to vote for everybody.
And they go, congratulations to APAC endorsed Randy
Fine. Surprise, surprise. We're proud to support you.
And he goes, proud to have been APAC
fasted ever endorsement. Surprise, surprise. And for the
haters who said they bought me. I have
news for you. They had me for free.
And then get this.
Fact check. Nope. They gave him a hundred
minutes to $26,000
Now I'm sure he didn't he probably just
meant that they didn't need to pay him,
but they did anyway, though, which is important
to recognize. So they bribed this man. The
point is they didn't need to because he's
already a radical Zionist who wants to kill
children. But what's interesting is here's AIPAC saying
Bernie Sanders is forcing a vote as soon
as tomorrow on two resolutions to, guess what,
block arms Israel. Now Sanders has already shown
himself to be weak and meek in this
conversation, or any of them when it comes
to something, I think, sub substantial.
Either way, regardless of who, obviously, we should
be trying to stop illegal arms funds, which
are illegal in the international sense and domestically
based on what they're doing, for going to
a genocide.
He's just try so he's doing something the
whole world recognizes should stop.
The APAC stands up and goes, tell your
senators to oppose these efforts.
So wait a minute. A lobbying group is
past the election process, past anybody being voted
in,
lobbying direct legislation
for Israel?
Yeah, guys. And that should be a big
deal, but it only is not when it
comes to Israel.
Can you realize lobbying groups are usually about
are almost entirely about funding directions for, you
know, larger people being elected, large you know,
large this is about specific moment to moment
legislation where they speak up and throw money
around to affect the outcome of American legislation
as an Israeli entity. It is not an
American entity. You can prove it
very simply by looking at their background. It's
even on Wikipedia, but we just lie to
ourselves like everything else, it seems.
Now here's Randy Fine, the candidate who won,
says Assata Bukele, and it says, there is
no suffering adequate for these animals. May the
streets of Gaza overflow with blood. That's what
Randy Fine said. Dan Sheehan said more than
a hundred thousand people in Florida voted for
this man yesterday. Now, again, I just I'm
not trying to, you know, diminish that that's
probably could have been the case. I just
don't know how we believe that that's how
it works today. Either way, some people definitely
support this man. And most importantly, Donald Trump,
who openly endorsed him for, like, the fifth
time. But here and when Candace called him
out for this as he shared this picture
this picture of a dead baby in Gaza
where he said,
how do you sleep at night? They were
asked. And he said, quite well, actually. Thanks
for the pic of a dead child in
Gaza. That's the person we're talking about. That's
the person who Donald Trump supports, and she
called him out as a monster. And he
said, I'm on the opposite side of you.
I'm doing something right. Thanks for the endorsement.
Just doubling down, guys. These people, maybe they
are completely,
on a I mean, maybe they can
get away with this.
Maybe they that my point is they think
that. They think that they're untouchable. Maybe they
are. I'd like to believe opposite.
Thomas Massey on that on the nose of
that point talks about dual citizenship in this
country, which I think is interesting how Fox,
the guy keeps trying to pull it away
from the obvious, but it's worth thinking about
because this is something he's putting forward. Like,
I bet you it gets pushed back on
by everybody.
But this is what we're talking about. The
Randy Fiennes of the world. I'll make the
point about dual citizenship and what we can
prove in a second, but here's this clip.
Over the weekend, director of national intelligence, Tulsi
Gabbard, revoked security clearances for several people who
are no longer in office. She wrote on
x, per president Trump's directive, I have revoked
former president Joe Biden's security clearance and revoked
clearances
and access to classified information for Kamala Harris,
Hillary Clinton, Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, Fiona Hill,
and Alexander Vindman.
But why do out of office people still
have
Oh, Adam Kinzinger in the few classified information.
The government because they're act.
I don't have any problem upfront with the
audience in telling influencing the government
Okay. Sorry. The first part was about something
I didn't wanna get into. It's important. It's
about the classified information and who gets to
con you know, keep it, but we're rushing
for time, so I'll skip that. But it's
important to talk about in the future.
Because they can have conversations
with people who are still inside of the
government, you know, elections should have consequences,
so take away their security clearances.
Our congressman, I've been following you on this.
I'm really interested in what you're proposing, a
dual loyalty disclosure act.
I don't have any problem upfront with the
audience and telling anyone listening. I don't like
it when I see an elected official have
more than the American flag in there, for
example, bio on x. I don't wanna see
Ukrainian flag. I don't wanna see an Israeli
flag. I wanna see single loyalty to The
United States Of America. Tell me about the
dual loyalty disclosure act.
Yeah. We swear an oath to the constitution.
And the question is if you're a citizen
of two countries, which oath are you taking
more seriously?
Or can you take them both seriously? Look,
I would prefer that people without dual with
dual citizen have to renounce their citizenship in
the other country before they run. I would
also prefer that if they are dual citizens
that they, don't vote on issues that may
affect those other countries. But at a minimum,
we should do what the bill I introduced,
does, which is require candidates for federal office
to disclose whether they have dual citizenship
and which countries
they may have citizenship
in. That way the voters can decide whether
they should be
able to represent The United States while being
a citizen
of another country. How broad is this how
broad is this problem, congressman? How many members
of congress have dual citizenship?
Notice they laughed right there. I think this
is very relevant, and I'll show you why.
Because this is listen to this point, then
we'll talk about it. Well, you know, I
I keep hearing people say, oh, you can't
prove that any of them do. Well Mhmm.
I can show you former
people who were,
in congress who did and we only know
because they ran for president and it came
out. For instance, Ted Cruz
had citizenship in Canada and Michelle Bachman, I
think had
citizenship in Switzerland. Now, they both renounced their
citizenship. There's no problem there. But the question
is, what about congressmen who aren't put under
the spotlight? What citizenship do they hold in
other countries? And, I'm not picking on any
particular country. I just think this is a
common sense bill Yeah. American citizens wanna know.
And I'm not banning it. I'm just saying
tell us Right. Which countries you're a citizen
of.
I I I totally agree. I don't think
it's focusing on any one country. I mean,
it could be the Ukrainian flag pins that
we see everywhere.
Any other country. I mean Yeah. Our loyalty
should be singular, especially as an elected representative
to The United States Of America.
Great to hear from you. I mean, you
know, it's funny. He doesn't need to say
that again. And it's quite it's almost like,
you know,
it's it's it's, conspicuous that he's like, this
doesn't it could be any flag. Well, obviously,
man. The only reason you're saying that is
because you all know what we're thinking about.
What's interesting though is that there's two points.
Like, I do argue that it should be
something that, you know I I I agree
with both of them. It's weird that the
bill it's it's a step in the right
direction where he says the bill is just
about finding out, which is interesting. I think
that's the right way to do it, in
fact, because it'd be it'd be more conspicuous
sort of to push back on something like
that. Why would you not want people to
know? Right? That's interesting. But I do argue
that it should be what even they're both
saying. That I don't think you should be
able to be in that position if you
have a potential of conflicts of interest in
regard to politics,
being part of like, being having interest in
another country's outcome, or as he said, swearing
an oath to another country. Like, these things
matter. And it's not just about Israel. It's
really not. But it is the most important
part of it because of how obvious that
overlap is in this country. Now he he
the point about the dual citizenship is he's
right, though. Right now, there's literally no requirement
for them to even divulge that. How how
is that possible while these very same people
are the ones screaming about how you can't
vote if you're not a citizen? I mean,
it's just it's in a weird way the
same conversation. Right? But on top of that,
it it's important to recognize that there are
a lot of overlaps. Now, also, the main
point, it's not about being Jewish
alone. That's a overlap. Sure. But it's not
just you can't just show who everyone Jewish
in the in the congress and say that's
the issue. It's not. Because I can prove
some of them well, at least the I
would argue that some of them don't have
a citizenship in Israel.
But we already and and and, typically, I'll
just read it from the Grok answer, they
have to move there essentially and and, you
know, be at least plan to, and that's
how that happens. But I've seen Israel give
citizenship to people in congress or people in
power, let's say, and people in political standing.
That has happened. So recognize that this is
an opaque situation, and that's kind of the
point.
So asking Grock first, it simply says there's
no definitive public evidence confirming, and I'm just
asking about Randy Fine, holds any citizenship. And
it goes on to make the bigger point
about
in general, and which is that, no, they
don't really have to show that. And so
but the evidence seems to highly suggest, even
Grock says, that that is the case. But
then you ask, brave, and it says Randy
Fine is an Israeli dual citizen. This is
mentioned in a post from November now from
November. Now remember, this could just be information
pulled off online, so these things are just
broad. Derek made a great point recently about
this. We should not be blindly taking you
know, you know we already know that from
any content about anything, even a article well
sourced. We should check it ourselves. Obviously, that
goes for the AI dynamic, but it's a
broad kind of what it's grabbing. That's why
I find it useful, but we gotta be
careful how this, you know, I'm never gonna
be the one that's leaning into like we
see some researchers today. And especially not everything.
I'm using GROC for a counterbalance to make
a point. Largely with Brave, I try to
use it. But the point is that as
you look into it, it becomes clear that
there's a lot of overlap and a lot
of opacity to whether or not. And so
that's why this bill needs to be there.
And you know why this is coming out
because there is evidence in the past that
that is a problem.
Now
Greg Rees put this out in the same
direction, and I think it's worth playing. Scrapping
the first amendment at the behest of a
foreign power.
On the campaign trail, Donald Trump promised to
deport those protesting
Israeli war crimes.
Unlike liberal Kamala, I will support Israel's right
to win its war on terror. You have
to support that.
Gotta win. Gotta finish it off.
And instead of pandering to the jihad sympathizers
and America hating radicals,
we will deport them. We will deport them
very quickly. We have no choice.
When it comes to Israel, who has given
him over $230,000,000,
Trump keeps his promises
For simply writing an op ed article on
the Israeli genocide of Gaza, Rumaisa Ozturk was
kidnapped off the street by unidentified
plainclothes
federal police.
And you saw this guy, right, who played
this on the show. Right? And this is
the good this is one of the best
examples. This is a she's legally in this
country.
I believe she was a a doctoral student,
the very least that Ivy League. And then
with the ground, I I think with the
school if she was at. But a high
level school,
and she was deported to the moon
because she
wrote an op ed
about Palestine. And it was you could read
it. I showed you on the show. Saw?
It's solid. It's it's not hyperbolic. It's not
about Hamas. It's specifically saying divest because they're
committing genocide, and they can't stand that. So
for all those screeching out there that these
are that this the guy's making the point
that they're putting their masks on. They didn't
identify themselves. They did not present a warrant.
We talk about this. These people aren't accountable,
guys, and they know that. Yeah. You don't
look like it. Why are you hiding your
faces?
But legally in this country hiding your faces?
No criminal record
simply had the wrong ideas.
That's what's going on in 2025 in The
United States.
No. This is the police. Yeah.
The US cornerstone
Yeah.
Arguably,
the cornerstone
of American freedom,
the first amendment of The US constitution
is to protect the right of the people
to peacefully express their views
no matter who they may offend.
But Trump's make America great again movement is
clearly
about Israel First, and Israel
is getting their money's worth.
People are demonstrating
with passion.
These ignorant
demonstrators.
Who are they demonstrating for? For these murderers,
these rapists,
these mass killers.
You know, even though there was no rapes
that they can prove, and in fact, all
the evidence shows it didn't happen. But we'll
just keep lying about it because
it's an agenda.
This is a reflection of a deep rot
that has pervaded the intellectual hub of free
societies.
Well, that's certainly true, but he's not pointing
at himself, obviously.
And this vilification
of Israel, the Jewish people,
and western values. Nope. It's only Israel, guys.
Anybody I mean, that's the majority of the
world right now. We're call they're calling out
Israeli government action. They're the ones conflating it
with Jewish people or trying their best to
conflate it with all things in the West.
And there's a lot of overlap there. But
it's all about saying, well, you murdered all
these people in Iraq, so why is it
not okay? Like, you're you're making argument for
you, bud. Yeah. You're all doing we all
cared then too. You're doing it now again.
Does it make it okay because you're allies
with the other group that committed genocide? That's,
you know and, look, you can debate whether
you think Iraq or anything others deemed to
rise the level of genocide. That's why it's
important just to simply recognize even though we
obviously know what's happening in Gaza's genocide, it
by every metric possible,
it
if you are uncomfortable with that, then acknowledge
that there's endless amounts of war crimes. It
ultimately comes to the same position, guys. These
people will be in jail, But there's no
denying that. With the medics they just killed,
I mean, every day, this is another massive
war crime that if any other country in
any other context did it even once, would
be earth shattering. It would be on we
talked about we talked about it for months
because Israel wouldn't stop talking about it. Nobody
cares about these because
there's something going on here. That's it's very
simple.
Has been propagated by a systemic alliance
between the ultra progressive left
and radical Islam.
It must be resolutely fought by civilized societies
to safeguard their future. Right. The the the
radical Islam that you can prove that The
US and Israel have been funding
for decades.
The most radical elements of the very Islamic
things that Loomer and rest point to, the
people that Loomer support are the ones funding
those things, just like Hamas, by the way.
That's why this is falling apart so readily
and rapidly is because people can prove these
things right now. Like, I can prove these
people were literally innocent with no criminal record
that we're here legally.
People just don't care. They don't like it.
They don't want it. They're looking for the
news served to them just the way they
like. I don't think that's the majority. But
think about that. Only liberals and radical Islam,
you know, aside from the fact that they're
the ones funding these groups, think about, again,
the ridiculousness of saying that these the people
who are actively speaking out, more than anybody,
by the way, about
human rights violations and so on, whether or
not you agree with everything else they believe
in, it doesn't make any sense. It's like
pretending that ISIS is working with white supremacists
or, you know, they they will throw anything
they can at you in order to make
you feel the way you they want you
to feel in a certain situation to achieve
immediate ends. And half the time, three weeks
later, they do something that that contradicts what
they just said. That's that's the mainstream alternative
media every day. Don't miss that overlap.
This is why we must all come in
president Trump's decisive actions against antisemitism,
and we must pressure
other governments
to do the same.
MAGA is leading the way in censorship,
but that's not good enough for the Zionists
who control America.
Antisemitism
is not just an age old prejudice.
It is a contemporary
crisis manifesting on campuses
across the nation.
It is not enough for individuals or institutions
to merely claim they are not anti Semitic.
As my father once taught me, it is
not enough for people, especially public figures, to
be neutral or not be anti Semitic. One
must be anti Semitic.
We must demand the same of our universities
and government institutions.
This hearing, in my opinion, is an attempt
to be just that,
anti anti Semitic.
There is no voting your way out of
this quagmire.
Israel has control
over the US government.
Government can do in two months more than
any organization could do in its lifetime.
The government,
a government, the United States government or the
government of of France or the government of
any other country has the power
to reign in antisemitism
in a much more effective way.
And and, you know, people say, well, you
know, the governments are not in the business
of changing the way people think. That's true.
But, you know, to my thinking, most people
who are, you know, antisemites, most of these
people running around, we're not gonna win their
hearts and minds because they don't have hearts
and they don't have minds. So, you know,
how are we gonna there's no reason to
think we're ever gonna convince them, but we
can. Just dehumanization.
Right? So people over here going, please stop
the genocide. Free Palestine.
And now we know that exists. Right? Let's
just say in your mind, you think that
half of them all hate Jews. Fine. I
don't agree. I think it's obviously not the
case. But you know that there are some
people that don't who just want Palestine to
be free. Right? They're giving you a broad
net around all of them and just going
there. They don't have hearts. They don't have
mind. They're they were rapists, Hamas supporting terrorists,
jihadists. That's a loomicide. That's what they're doing.
That's ridiculous, and everyone should laugh at people
like that, guys. We all used to remember
that broad strokes in any context was always
ignorant
because you're you're going it's it's everything in
politics today. That's why, again, I think so
many people are starting to see through this,
but that's the larger point is ask yourself
why they will be so clumsy with these
agendas knowing that they would shake people free.
Either there's something else at the end of
that that's not an American interest or there's
an endgame here. That's my opinion. Support them.
We can put them in jail. We can
make their lives miserable. We can cut off
their funding. And that's what the Trump administration
is doing for the first time.
Greg Reese reporting.
Okay. So right now, looks like I got
about twenty something minutes left. So let me
see if I can get through this here
at the end.
Then we're pretty much I mean, we're on
track for the most part, so I wanna
highlight this. This is redacted put out. Now
we already talked about this. In fact, I
I brushed over it, but I had a
whole setup of, like, a segment I had
ready that I haven't even gotten to. I
do that all the time, in fact. Like,
research something for hours one day and just
never end up using it. That was about
the overlap of the the the cartel
and and Zionism in Israel. It's actually shockingly
obvious. And every time I get into these
things, it's like, my god. How did I
not know Israel was literally funding and and
working throughout the genocide in Rwanda or Bosnia?
It's insane how obvious this stuff is. The
point is that you can prove that. And
you can prove, as they say right here,
redacted did their own research on it. Bombshell.
Mexican cartels have Israeli spyware. Now that's the
you can find that in corporate media. But
it says they're turning American phones into spy
devices. From your text to your searches, they
see it all. They've been using your camera
to might just spy on you. Now that's
called the no what is it called? The
no click?
Something like basically, you don't even have to
click a link. That's how this Israeli spyware
works. That's the that's the NGO group. That's
Pegasus. That's what you that's what Trump just
made allowed in this country. That's what they're
immersing themselves with that in this country. These
are all so incredible.
I don't know why these things are huge
stories, but the point is that think about
that overlap with the same people we're MS
thirteen. We're going after oh, you mean the
same group that Israel's giving spyware to that
you're working with? It's just it's guys, this
stuff is all there. That's not to say
every person that's in a gang is part
of it, but it's you need to see
how these things are engineered, manufactured, and they
rush them toward the the border, and then
they let too many in. They turn around
and go, I can't allow that. They're infiltrating
us, and we have to do the borrow
the biometric
wall, and we have to, you know,
sensor. It it all comes together.
Whatever the narrative is that day, and they're
all manufacturing these things. And some piece parts
get out of control, but at the end
of the day, it is clear. You can
see that they are moving pieces around the
board.
Now Aaron again now, by the way, I
thought I thought I'd add that first.
I'm gonna go over this quick because I
wanna get some of these clips here. Now
I was gonna there was a point about
this about being partisan.
The point is that this is funny to
me how many people push like, this guy
I talked about before. Not very familiar with
him until this story, but, Aaron,
Reshlin Melnick, who's an immigration lawyer. And simply
because of that, people act like he is
not to be trusted. It's just it's like
any political stance, guys. You can watch CNN
and Fox News and recognize they're both trying
to lie to you and still
consider the points being made and ask you
what the agenda is. The point is that
you can look at what he's presenting as
a lawyer in this conversation. And, I mean,
he claims the group is nonpartisan, but that's
rare today. The bottom line is you can
prove what he's saying, and people are just
disregarding it because, well, he's a democrat. That
is the dumbest thing in the conversation from
either side. This is important to recognize because
you the court documents are provided, which you
can read for yourself and prove for yourself
that what Vance is saying is a lie.
They know what they're doing. And same with,
what's her name? Leave it.
They're lying. They're they're outright lying. Why? I
would argue she might be lying, or she's
just relaying what she's being told that's a
lie and doesn't even know. I don't know
why we think they're ever in the conversation.
They're just press secretaries.
But Aaron here says Vance is badly wrong,
and Vance is the one claiming that this
guy's a gang member. I think it was
Garcia. I'll show you the name in a
second. Oh, it's right here.
Yeah.
Kilmar
Garcia. And the point is that this guy
got picked up in a Home Depot in
02/2019.
They they they picked him up on on
on I think he was wearing a Bulls
hat and something else. It was not connected
to anything. It was all I mean, even
the bull's connection is because of the number
23.
But it's a Jordan thing. That's the tattoo
they claim. But now a bull's hat somehow
means Jordan, which means 23, therefore, he's Venezuelan
gangs. It is ridiculous.
And you can prove that the actual document
they're pointing to says that he was released
with no charge. They even says that there
was nothing to it. They wrote down MS
13
on that dot. That's what they're pointing to.
And how will you even turn that into
being a leader of the gang is the
craziest part. But it's all here for you
to look through, including the link to the
document and everything they're highlighting for you. The
point
oh, and this was I I think I
just had this in the wrong spot.
There was a court filing this evening. The
Trump administration said that it oh, we already
know this. Mistakenly
deported a Maryland father to the to El
Salvador. Now this is just one that they've
admitted to. And and I think it's right
here even. Yeah. No ability to bring him
back, they're saying. We already talked about this
in the last show. Trump lawyers forced to
admit they permanently sent an innocent man to
a nightmare prison. Now these are examples. This
one in particular, he was here legally.
He was going through a process.
And the judge even then ruled. You can't
send him there. The reason he was given
asylum from El Salvador is because he was
being threatened by the very government or groups
in that in in the country, and they
gave him asylum
or in the process of. So there's a
legal reality to that, and they kicked him
out anyway. And on top of that, he's
not a criminal. He had no criminal record.
Same thing in every conversation. But there's there's
plenty more that aren't even some process. People
that literally had a green card who are
here legally. Nothing changed, except they spoke out
about Israel and they got kicked out of
the country.
And this what's interesting is even Joe Rogan
has spoken up about this, calling it terrific.
I
mean, there are people breaking lot breaking ra
rank with this, guys, and they're starting to
go, this is crazy because they're not absolutely
lost in partisanship.
Or whatever you think it is because this
is serious.
What's happening is alarming and serious. Now, here's
what Vance just said. Now let's be clear.
I'm going over quick because I have a
little bit limited time, but the last show
we just did, it's all in here, guys.
Trump deportation revealed to be full of innocent
people. There's all the source material. All of
it you can link to. All chronologics so
you can find it in the process of
the time of the show. And there's countless
court documents.
Even
corporate media covering of the Trump administration saying
themselves,
these people were not criminals. They were here
legally. They were deported.
Here's what Vance says about the MS thirteen
guy. They claim his MS thirteen, even though
we know Israel's working with them and, you
know, on and that. The point is that,
clearly, we can prove that the only thing
they're pointing to is the one document that
they wrote that down. They weren't even charged
at the time. And all this time later,
it comes back around that he's the leader
of this gang, so why wasn't he removed
before that? And by the way, this went
through Donald Trump's administration, guys. That's when that
happened, 02/2019.
Few cases out there where the Democrats and
the media say, oh, this person was just
an innocent father of three, and then you
find out, for example I think this is
the case that you're talking about. Back in
2019, an immigration judge looked at all the
evidence, looked at all the data, and concluded
that this allegedly innocent person that we sent
to El Salvador
was actually a member of an MS thirteen
gang. False.
Now what's crazy is that just because Vance
sits there and says it, that somehow that
means it's true. That's the kind of hero
worship we have in the partisanship. And, of
course, you get no pushback from Fox News
that apparently did no vetting of the conversation
or did and didn't push back even they
knew he was lying.
Typical journalism in the court meeting today. He
had also committed some traffic violations. He had
not shown up for some court dates. This
is not exactly father of the year here.
My god. My god. Now in regard to
the court violations, I was looking into that,
and I can't I mean, these are things
that are from beside the information that I
can see, it's it's not even relevant to
the documentation being presented about the case. So
if that wouldn't matter, if it wasn't presented
in the case against him, then why is
he bringing it up now? If there he's
just trying to muddy the waters and make
it about somebody who, God forbid, had some
traffic violations while you're literally ignoring people that
actually committed violence
or Epstein trafficking or
everything else we're talking about or continuing genocide.
The person that we don't think should be
in our country. Here's the most important point,
though, Lawrence. Oh, but, again, even though even
if you wanna think it's all true, they
still get effing due process. That's what's so
frustrating about this is either way you go
with it, they're not giving people their rights
or or or, acknowledging
their inherent rights. Says whatever the argument is,
whatever the justification is, no one doubts. Not
even the crazy left wing media criticize the
idea that we could deport this person. They
just took issue with the reasoning.
Okay. But see, here's how the false binary
works. Right? Seeing how they're all on the
same side and they're all working towards the
same agenda whether they know it or not,
you can't go what the other side says
because that's not a full picture because they're
both pulling punches and making it work. You
know? So you need to look at the
full picture of people like us. There's a
lot of people out there. Glenn Glenn Greenwald,
for example, has been railing against this because
he knows what he's talking about. One of
the things I've seen him more consistent on
than anything is about constitutional rights as that's
his forte.
And for crying out loud, it's out there.
But you look at the left, right, like
dynamic, and they they keep you trapped right
in the middle. For why we deported this
person. This was unquestionably
an illegal alien. This was unquestionably
a person who broke the laws to get
into our country. This Now now you could
argue that there now here's the interesting overlap.
Breaking the law, getting the country makes people
think of climbing over a fence. I would
argue it's actually inaccurate to say he broke
the law to get in the country if
you're coming to the coming to the gate
and presenting yourself and trying to seek asylum.
Is it a just because your notes get
it's some limbo while you go through the
legal process, that's not irreligally. That's that's dishonest.
But on top of that, that's not true.
You could dispute the first part about what
was claiming, you know, was here legally for
a moment until he was given a sign.
The point is that's not the reality of
when they took action. But this guy is
just lying, guys. That's the reality every time
we talk about this. If you can't wrap
your mind around politicians lying so they stay
out of jail or so they achieve an
agenda, then why are we here? It's unquestionably
a person an immigration judge had found had
zero right to be in The United States
Of America. We do not Oh, and did
they present
information? Did we get to go through a
process? Ask permission
from far left Democrats before we deport illegal
immigrants. We do the American people's business. And,
again
It's in that I mean, it's just it's
insulting to your intelligence, guys. That's what it
is.
Now Gleavitt did the same thing the day
before, saying, no. He was MS thirteen gang
leader. Oh, and tied to human trafficking. You
know, the same human trafficking that was completely
pulled away from while they pulled all of
their agents over to go after antisemitism,
which Melnick reported in front of congress. Apparently,
all the screaming left, right wing, right team
sport politics right
who can't stop pointing at everything about pedophiles
and all these different things because there and
there is importance in that conversation suddenly don't
care about it when they pull all of
their re their effort to move to go
after things Israel doesn't like.
Why doesn't that matter? Because that did happen.
Child trafficking investigations, drug investigations, they pulled the
majority to go after people protesting. It's all
documented. It's very easy. We went over it
in the last show. As Derek said, in
regard to Betty Johnson, gleefully sharing this idiocy,
you're a mouthpiece for the establishment. The Trump
admin provided no evidence for these claims in
the courtroom.
Now
in regard to the legalities, I'll let you
a couple points I wanna highlight.
Oh, and these just these are just I
shoulda had this now. I didn't get to
organize. I was rushing. This is an example.
So basically, I put this show out. Funny
how suddenly the the images didn't show in
regard to Trump deporting people who were innocent.
Not illegally. Not illegal. Not illegally here. No
criminal record. I think I was fake news.
I just said, and the woke right strikes
again. Do you see a bro flake when
you look in the mirror or just a
democrat? The point is, guys, that's remember how
the democrats were like, fake news to everything?
Same thing we're seeing. That's one of the
one of the metrics,
for me anyway.
The point is it's not fake news. It's
easily proven, and people just don't care. Another
one here. I said, sadly, many Americans are
still falsely claiming everyone deported as a violent
criminal. But even if not, they're all here
illegally.
That's verifiably false. This this in the show
I linked to, he go over I go
over six different deportations of people who were
here legally with no record. He goes, news
flash. Saying not everyone being deported are violent
criminals doesn't mean they didn't break the law.
They need to be deported. So it it's
like he didn't the point is he doesn't
he thinks what I'm saying
explicitly is me falling for the trap the
trap that, no. Well, they well, they came
in illegally, but they didn't break any laws
after that. I just the words I just
wrote out make it very clear. I'm acknowledging
that exact point. I think it's either a
bot or somebody who just reflexively pushes back,
and I think that's a lot of the
conversation. But you can go through and
look. Somebody same guy saying, well, there was
well, there has, been a warning going out
that anyone who is found that is in
the country illegally will be deported, and they
tend to be found.
Like,
I just so, again, apparently, you didn't bring
the title. It's obvious that this is something
that is not you can prove it. The
documents are there.
These people are trying to gaslight others. And
and then as TJ True rightly points out,
well, even if they're here illegally, which I
don't support illegal immigration or migration, they still
have the right to due process under the
Constitution.
Both these foundational points are being pushed back
on by the people who claim to be
the most supporting of the Constitution.
Either completely lost or dishonest.
No ability to bring him back. Are we
kidding?
As somebody else pointed out I I maybe
I forgot to grab it.
There it is.
He goes then Matt Lettch says, pretty cool
how we can film these places in four
k. This is El Salvador.
Like, it's a Marvel movie. But if we
send someone there accidentally,
there's no way to get them back.
It's obviously it's ridiculous. And not only that,
it's an innocent person. I mean, my point
in the title today, guys, realize, in principle,
there's no difference here. An American citizen has
constitutional rights. A green card holder or even
a legal alien has constitutional rights in the
in the context of this conversation. So for
them to be removed, it's really no different
in principle. Obviously, it would be more of
a big deal for Americans, but it really
shouldn't be at the point I'm trying to
make.
It's alarming that we have to fight this
argument as it's literally happening.
Here's an example.
Oscar Arias Sanchez, a Nobel laureate and former
Costa Rican president who's been a vocal critic
of Donald Trump, says The US just revoked
his visa? No reason. Is
this a terrorist?
You know what I mean? It's it's a
Nobel laureate, for crying out loud. A former
president of a country who simply speaks about
Trump and they, yank it because these people
are not following any logic, any law. They're
just reacting,
probably for a foreign country. But either way,
it's important to recognize this keeps happening. There's
an issue with Maine right now regarding Social
Security information. It's they're acting childishly in petty
ways.
And remember that he's already floated the idea
of sending Americans
to El Salvador
for Tesla actions, whether or not it's a
Molotov cocktail, whether or scratching a car. That's
outrageous.
And I just wanna thank him. He's going
through a lot,
what they're doing to him.
And these people are gonna be caught, and
they they're gonna be caught, and they're gonna
be prosecuted.
And from what they tell me, I see
this just by watching your programs
and reading the news, but from what they
tell me, they could get twenty years in
jail, and they'll get it. I'll tell you.
There's gonna be no leniency and there'll be
no pardons. I can tell you that. Right?
And you said this morning twenty years in
jail and then maybe
they'll go to one of these prisons in
El Salvador. Do you think with the way
that
the judges have been issuing injunctions,
it would be easier or harder to send
these Tesla domestic terrorists
to a jail in El Salvador than these
MS 13 or Trendy arrival guys? Guys. Well,
I view these people as terrorists just like,
others. These are when I looked at those
showrooms burning
and those cars, not one or two
You're a terrorist. If you dare to go
against Elon Musk, and Pam Bondi has been
almost cartoonishly saying exactly that. We'll come after
you if you dare. You better stop.
This is very weird. And, of course, this
whole building of their this whole coordinated thing,
which wouldn't surprise me, they keep dripping this
down. Here, this clip, if you wanna listen
to it, thirteen seconds, Elon Musk announced that
they know who's behind the attacks. Oh, yeah.
And so you click the link, guess what
happens? They don't tell you who. She just
asked him, do you know? And he goes,
oh, yeah. We know.
Oh, breaking news. Elon says we know and
the and then they title it. Elon announces
we know,
but nobody tells you who it is. Is
that just the dumbest thing in the world?
I mean, I maybe they do. But the
point about this is to control the information,
and it's not about accountability here.
Now this is, New York Times. Rubio has
ordered diplomats overseas to scrutinize the social media
content of some applicants for students and other
types of visas in an effort to bar
those suspected
of criticizing US and Israel. That's directly from
the article.
And he goes, I like how Israel gets
equal billing with America here.
The point is that you're going overseas now
to look at social media. Now you could
argue, sure. We can do deny people for
a number of reasons in regard to coming
into the country. Once they're in, they have
due process. The point, nonetheless, is that this
is not what we pretend this country is.
Now you're dictating you can't say those things,
so you're not allowed in this country. Now
you can agree with that. You can even
say it's the legal reality is okay,
but that's not what we pretend we are,
guys. These are these people are breaking the
image of what this country at least pretended
to be.
Glenn Greenwald says the pro Israel censorship regime
isn't just targeting foreign students, it's also constricting
free speech of rights
excuse me. Free speech rights of Americans. The
Trump administration demanded Colombia implement a radically extended
EU style hate speech code that outlaws a
wide range of Israel criticisms.
But, yeah, keep fighting for the free speech
world, guys, as the our country undermines exactly
that with your voices.
Wake up.
And here's what the White House put out.
I mean, can you how do you even
wrap your mind around this?
Making fun, even though especially now that we
know that they sent innocent people, no criminal
record who are here legally to El Salvador.
I know at least three or four cases
we covered in the last show who are
in El Salvador. One is a a kid
who was in the process of getting his
visa or asylum, so it's still illegal for
them to move him, who had no criminal
record, who simply had the tattoo that they
claim was out was, Venezuelan gang tattoo. They've
now proven definitively that it was not.
And here's what they do. They put a
cartoon of a woman crying being deported. That's
it. White House post that.
These are children.
This is official White House account post a
meme mocking migrant women being apprehended by ICE.
Why would you even do that?
At this stage, it doesn't matter what the
context or backstory is. Posting this content is
shocking. That's what she says. There's something wrong
with these people. No. Look. You can it's
I'm you can agree they should be able
to do what they want, post what they
want. Fine. It's it's it's just about showing
you that they're, like, what is the logic
here? This is this is Elon Musk and
the Trump mindset of, like, memes and trying
to troll people. It's embarrassing.
The world's laughing at this country when they
do stuff like that.
Ryan Grim says, another student disappeared by ice,
this time at the University of Alabama. Oh,
guess what? An Iranian PhD student. We talked
about it. The point is, this is not
what they pretend they were going after. These
are politically targeted, Israel
focused
people that they want removed.
Not breaking the law here legally.
But, yeah, they'll keep screeching online how they're
all illegal aliens because the Democrats lie.
They're the you're the dumbest person in the
room for falling for things like that, if
you're honest. If not, you're just dishonest and
you lie knowing you're lying. Immigrant women describe
hell on earth in ICE detention. Now I'm
gonna wrap this up. The point is I'll
go into this another show. It's actually shocking
what these people are what they're telling you,
what their treatment was in these ICE and
these aren't people that are criminals. Yeah. You
could say they were here illegally. Now this
is a separate conversation than that we were
just having.
They're here illegally? That's they're breaking the law,
guys. That's I that's very obvious. My point
is that they're still human beings, and there's
no reason they should be jammed into this,
like, three times the capacity, giving them not
enough water to, you know, to barely survive
on. Like, it just shows you there's a
hatred here. And I don't think it's shocking
to see how that connects with the other
conversation.
Aramelnik also points out, there's evidence ICE has
submitted in the case of the gang worksheet
filed filled out by local cops in 02/2019.
So this would have been over there. I
just didn't organize it well because I was
rushing. He had a bull's gear on. That's
what I was just saying. Not the 23
number, but just a bull's hat that they
then connect to 20 3, which then they
they say means that Venezuelan town. That's what
they claim. Not like somebody could just actually
get a Marco Jordan twenty three tattoo.
You know? They have the wrong skin color
in that tattoo. That's enough. We already talked
about it. The but let but I guess
just a bull's hat is enough. A confidential
informant said he was part of it. That's
it.
It's very clear, and you could link you
could read it for yourself. He's always including
the links, guys.
But here she is, screaming that he's a
leader of the gang.
They know they're lying.
This is another example I'll go over in
the future. It's a different point, but it's
about somebody who's here illegally, but the way
they go through this, I think is shocking.
In The UK, they're randomly going after a
group of Quakers that simply had a group
meeting to to have a protest and they
went in and arrested them. It's like, it's
not just The United States.
Now just to wrap up here, I got
a few more minutes, just to show you
what what's going on in Israel. Again, it's
like you wanna make sure we're not missing
this stuff. The very group that your government
seems to be completely controlled by. Don't forget
that.
I cannot understand, Matt Kennard says, anyone whose
life hasn't stopped over the past eighteen months.
What we are witnessing our governments do is
beyond belief.
We live in dark in the darkest times.
A new world is being born, an ugly
and sick and monstrous one, before our eyes.
Act now.
Here's an interesting point.
Netanyahu comes out and says, in the future,
the state of Israel has to control the
entire area from the river to the sea.
Now you guys already know this point. It's
not new, but for those that may not
have seen the contradiction and the hypocrisy on
Twitter, Elon Musk came out and said, actually,
I might have been able to grab it
real quick.
There it is. I think I got it.
Oh, no. Okay. Oh, well. Well, there's another
one I put out where I called out
Elon Musk. Because in the the coup party
chart charter, which is Netanyahu's party, it literally
one of the first lines says river to
the sea. So I said, well and Musk
said, you can't say that on this platform.
That's genocide support.
In regard to them saying Israel should go
away. Right? Okay. Logically consistent, and then applies
either way. Right? Obviously not.
So here is he is saying it. And
I said, well, Elon Musk, I thought this
was genocide language
and would not be accepted on this platform
that you said very clearly. Or does Israel
get special allowance on this platform? And if
so, why? Well, clearly, he won't respond.
Now a now this is Ghassan Abusita,
a very highly regarded doctor from Britain who
was in Gaza speaking out about this stuff.
He says Israel tortures a child in prison
to death.
AP can't even say that. And they kind
of,
you know, finagle with the title. And so
a teenager in the West Bank who was
held in a prison dies. We
the story is obvious.
If for the first Palestinian minor has died
in Israeli detention center,
You think that's gonna be called out by
all these sycophants? Hardly.
Oh, this I'm gonna come back to this
too. Here's Batar u worldwide. Batar is the
one that got Khalil was so,
targeted, and they keep throwing names at this
administration they keep responding to, jumping and clapping
like barking seals.
We've identified names of diaspora Jews, and we
will recommend being banned from Israel like Finkelstein.
Yet again, showing you it's about Zionism and
not Judaism. If you simply do the wrong
thing that's against the Zionist agenda, even if
a Jewish person, you are dis expelled, excommunicado
from Israel or from the Zionist control structure
and Batar is screaming about that. Here's another
one. Same thing.
Now they're saying we wanna occupy and cleanse
Gaza. Surprise, surprise. We already told you that
was coming. You already knew that. And lastly,
they're now speaking up and saying that we
are going to take all of the West
Bank. We're going to annex all of it,
which we already told you was gonna happen.
Now they're officially making a policy because that
is what the deal was with Trump, but
they were already doing this. Whether it's Miriam
Adelson or the deal in regard to the
false cease fire, both times, he agreed to
let them do that. Here we are. Don't
expect him to say anything about it even
though it's, it's, verifiably a crime.
Now Iran, to end in general, let's not
miss the fact. Trump is about to bomb
Iran, says Daily Mail. Top Israeli sources reveal
planned attack on nuclear sites and deliver chilling
war is coming warning.
We just play we just gave you the
clip last night from Propaganda and Co. This
is very real, guys. And Michael Frasier says
it's pretty crazy that the prospect of imminent
war with Iran is being openly and explicitly
telegraphed, and the political media class seems to
be going, they started to shrug on their
shoulders.
That is the coordination of the two party
illusion.
And even in Yemen, guys, as Sarah pointed
out on my birthday, in fact, The US
just dropped bombs on a vital water source
in Yemen. Over 50,000 civilians are cut off
from water. This isn't a mistake. It's a
deliberate war crime against civilian infrastructure, crime against
humanity, broad daylight. And I said, well, if
you've been paying attention, this is nothing new.
Just like the last decade under left and
right administrations two party illusion because Trump and
Biden and even before have been doing the
same. Remember, we've been talking about the Bob
Almeida Strait, the Hodeida Port. They went after
intentionally to deprive them of food and anything
else they need. 90 plus percent of what
they need comes through there.
And The US and Saudi Arabia and The
UAE have been decimating this place for decades.
Now they just did it again.
There's nothing new there, guys, and you have
to understand this is a gay this is
two party illusion.
They are the same thing.
So I'm gonna leave it there for time,
guys. Thank you for tuning in today.
Ultimately, we will be getting, I'm gonna be
like I said, you got you might see
little smaller things coming out here and there
with the carnival. I may be recording and
putting them out based on, signal. But either
way, thank you for tuning in, guys.
Always, you know,
what you do out there after these shows
is what I think is most important.
Talk about it. Share the information.
Spread the information. Make sure people are looking
to the source material. Wake people up, guys,
because this it's very clear. If you just
get it in front of people, they may
change their minds.
Thank you for tuning in. I love you
all. As always, question everything. Come to your
own conclusions. Stay vigilant.