Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last twenty four hours.
Tuesday, April first twenty twenty five. Thank you
for joining me today.
Definitely, just see the song was playing right
there, by the way, before I jump into
what I'm gonna get into today. That's one
of the new songs,
I put out for,
I guess, just under the last American Vagabond
that I put out that that I'll be
playing some of these at the upcoming third
eye carnival. There'll be a link included today
that I'll touch on in the second that'll
be coming up between the fourth and the
sixth. Actually tagged, this earlier today about kind
of what my plan will be going over
the next week. Planning to do some,
doing the show still as where I can,
but trying to do some smaller things
as throughout the carnival, like, in the RV,
having people come in and have conversations,
having a setup to kinda have some some,
kind of on the road interviews and so
on. And I had a little bit of
extra time. By the way, for those that
might have been confused, I put this out
with the wrong time, basically an hour from
now, and I realized I made a mistake
with my clock when I reset it in
here, so I was an hour ahead of
time. So I'm sorry if anybody was, caught
off guard with the timing. And I had
a few things to to catch up on
the back, and that's why I decided to
play that to start. So thank you for
tuning in today. I think the obvious follow-up
to this the the main focal point today.
One other thing really before it, the main
focal point is, again, the ongoing
just collapse or rather the the lack of
acknowledgment of our constitutional rights by the very
group professing to fight for them more than
anybody. And I I don't and make sure
you understand that from my perspective that it's
not
different groups. It is one part of the
same group, which is simply your US government.
But in this case, the right part of
that government that are all working in the
same direction,
really use the argument they're fighting for your
rights or your freedom or your liberty more
than anybody. And it seems right now expose
themselves to be some of the most,
I mean, working to undermine them,
maybe they just don't believe in them at
all. I mean, it's it's kind of terrifying
to see how this is going forward. And,
again, the evolution of the conversation around deportations
has been and it usually is with the
partisan field
that something starts and we look at it
and we go, well, that's pretty incredible because
no due process and well, they're here illegally.
And it's like, okay. Well, that doesn't actually
apply seeing as how even illegal immigrants do
have
constitutional rights, and we'll make that point for
the fifteenth time today.
But then, you know, then it evolves. Oh,
but wait. It turns out there was somebody
who here was under you know, had a
legal green card. Oh, well, they were supporting
terrorism.
Okay. Well, that still doesn't matter seeing as
how there should be a due process to
make those claims, improve those claims. And And
even then, the point is there are laws
in the books to deal with these things.
And it just and now we're getting to
the point, and and we've been following up
on this the entire time. I I probably
seven different people I can point to today
or people who were talking like, I've already
made the point about the person that was
here under asylum.
That's a that's a legal reality that took
place before he was deported, so he was
here legally.
Then there's people with green cards like the
Khalil conversation, which is not even debatable.
And then and then especially that we get
back to it now, and the time has
been to flesh out. The evidence is presented.
No one's channeled. There is no evidence. He
did not do any of the things they
claimed he did. The best they could do
was connect it to some other entity. It
was abs it was it was it was
lazy. I mean, it just it makes you
wonder why they had other opportunities they could
have used. But so that is a a
legal purse a person here legally who did
not break the law, who was deported because
he had opinions they don't like. That is
the reality no matter what the screaming partisans
are saying on either side.
That's provable.
Now we're gonna go over many more examples
today, and I'm start at this point, I'm
wondering what the reality is of any of
this, any of the people that were sent
there.
And showing people who are legally in this
country with no criminal record, who were sent
to a I mean, just for for those
out there that aren't aware, and I'm gonna
go through it today, think Guantanamo Bay. And
I mean, like, the kind of stuff that
we know took place there at the at
the behest of the US government.
Horrible things that are happening that are on
the record from Human Rights Watch that they
proudly talk about from El Salvador, that have
worked with the United US government for a
while through Biden's administration. Now in this
weird, the overlap. I thought Biden, Trump were
different, and they fought each other seeing as
but we're using things that were built then
and applying now.
It's it is really insane. And so the
main point of today is to highlight the
fact that regardless of what side you think
you're on, whether you think some parts of
this country are your enemy or your neighbor
or whatever it is, if you believe you're
fighting to uphold the values of this country,
let's just make it specific,
Constitutional rights. If you think that's an important
fight, then you need to call out what's
happening here because it is dangerous. Even if
you wanna think they're doing everything with the
best of intentions and just made some mistakes,
yes, that's a problem. A huge, monumental,
life changing
constitute
problem. I mean, I can add them.
The the point is that what they're doing
is going to continue to do dissolve,
I guess, the constitution. I always hesitate on
that because let's remember that it's not something
they can do away with. They even if
legislation passes that says these things don't matter,
that is still repugnant to the constitution, and
the Supreme Court ruling more than once has
made the case. If it's repugnant to the
constitution, it is null and void.
So the reality is we are watching the
precedents continue to go forward that slowly create
the reality in people's minds that these things
are a switch that could be turned on
and off. Now they're starting with the
a the, enemy
aliens enemies act
because that is what gives them in their
mind, even though even that is on legal
flimsy ground, the argument the the the the
pathway
to remove people who they claim are terrorists.
So that's why they went on to go,
okay. Well, now this group's a terrorist. Okay.
But what happens if we're simply pointing at
some guy with a rainbow tattoo? Well, let's
call him part of the gang that we
called terrorists, and that that works for us.
Now whether this is a conscious choice or
not, we can prove that they did this
in a way that would guarantee there was
really no pushback. Like, I mean, in the
sense of, like, the people the ICE agents
that were swing picking these people up will
go through the information they have. Even though
Leave It is pushing back to people in
a very aggressive,
flailing way to kind of make it about
a broad story, we'll go over that too
as well. The reality is the points are
public. You can see it for yourself. What
they did was arbitrary.
They have a tattoo. They have a certain
skin color. They're from a certain country. Get
rid of them. And now they're even starting
to sort of make that case knowing this
is falling apart. Okay. Well, we have we
can get rid of whoever we want. It's
not a it's a drain on this country.
I think Rubio said something very similar saying
that implying that, well, if they're not terrorists,
then it's okay because they were hurt. They
were draining on this country. Legally here with
jobs here for years in some cases with
families,
but they're draining this country because they're taking
advantage of the people who hate whoever they're
pointed at to hate. A lot of the
and let's realize it's just like the left.
Don't take this as a partisan thing. But
the case is that you can see people
on the right of the conversation who have
been worked up up in a frenzy to
hate anybody who might have been in this
country
or just with a different color
or people who've come here because their countries
are destroyed because of US policy and are
seeking asylum, which is the whole point of
that process.
On the left, you see the same thing
where you got them hating certain people because
of their skin color or because they wear
certain clothing or because they have certain ideology
and hate.
And it's unbridled and it is unnecessary and
it is driven into them. And that partisan
anger, that divide is what keeps this country
from changing.
And now people are getting swept up,
thrown out, put in concentration camps because they
have the wrong ideas.
On top of that, they've already floated the
idea more than once that Americans could be
next. And I'll play that clip again because
it seems like people just don't want to
acknowledge that he said that and then followed
up on it and doubled down on it.
How you don't see the concern
when these openly at least floating the idea
of Americans being next because they committed terrorism,
which they're pointing to people vandalizing Teslas.
Now I will follow-up on that story and
then one of the next shows. I already
have it pulled to the side about the
people being arrested and then the and it
it's
arrest them for vandalism and arson. That's a
federal crime. And in fact, they can actually
get twenty years in prison. That's not even
bombastic. But the person who committed arson and
vandalism combined, that's about what I it seems
like the, you know, highest level, but what
what you would expect.
But they're saying everybody who keys a car
and that's not my opinion. They're saying that.
If you're going after them, they're going after
you. Meanwhile, all the other important things are
happening. Is that what they promised? What are
the Epstein files? So many places to go.
The reality is this is all happening under
guys of fighting for what you want, and
the reality is it's actually undermining exactly what
you think you're fighting for. Just find the
courage to call it out. So I wanna
start with,
an article that Derek just put out today
because I'm not gonna this isn't the focal
point today, but to follow-up. Because we promised
you we would. Derek did, and he's been
following the story. They it's it's actually disconcerting.
I mean, I don't wanna go into it
right now because there's a lot of points
I'm gonna wanna jump into. The main crux
of the point is David Hamblin, who is
I mean, the evidence is overwhelming
about this person, child abuse, and this case
from the Utah sheriff's county
the Utah county sheriff's department,
ritualistic child abuse. That's not even that's not
to say satanic. That's the way they've conflated
him in this case to try to make
to ultimately get him dismissed, but he has
now gotten the charge dismissed.
This is I mean, this is like I
mean, there's so many the background of the
case goes back a long way. Nineties, the
thousand, two thousand two, where he's been charged
even by his family members of ritualistic abuse,
of child abuse, rape, all sorts of horrible
things.
And it got dismissed back then for for
absurd reasons. We've went through it in-depth. Here
we are again. They're claiming the sheriff's department
refused to give them certain documents, and that's
one of the main reasons they've dismissed this.
The sheriff's department spoke up and said, we
gave you those in 2022.
And everyone around here is going, here we
go again. This is what seems to happen
in Utah,
specifically around the Mormon church.
Now right after this has been dismissed now.
Ritualistic sex abuse charges dismissed against admitted admitted
child abuser because that is on the record.
What's crazy about it is as you're dismissing
this for some arbitrary
seeming,
you know,
administrative thing,
he has another case in another county. I
think it's Sanpete County right across the way
right now for more child abuse charges in
a different county. We'll see if those get
dismissed as well. Imagine having so much evidence
and so many multiple allegations in in different
locations across different years and have it consistently
be removed, ignored.
I mean, in some cases, just drop because
nothing ends up follow I mean, it's it's
you go through it for yourself. Again, it's
something that's important to go through. We I'm
probably gonna have Derek back on soon to
talk about all this, but make sure you
read it because you have to understand that
it's not just, you know, foreign policy. It's
not just about one there's a lot of
things going on in the world, and the
reality is that
government,
it's in in most ways in the world
today, maybe it doesn't always have to be.
But from my perspective, it's just organized crime,
guys, and it's abused everywhere I can see.
It's pretty alarming.
But we'll follow-up on this for sure because
it's not gonna go away. I mean, there's
still more cases to follow-up on that are
still gonna, you know, be fleshed out in
court.
And I just think when you realize, I
mean well, and on a side note, by
the way, that I we're probably gonna follow-up
on more because I'm which is funny. It's
kind of, you know, counters to what I
was kind of saying right there, but it's
not because it's searched out. It's because it's
prevalent and it's there. There is an obvious
and, I mean, shocking connection on the record
between Zionism and the Mormon church. Surprise, surprise.
I mean, if you dig into the background
around pretty much every majorly horrible event that
we can think of, you will find Zionism
fingerprints all over it. That's not my opinion.
You can prove that. So why would that
be ignored because you're afraid to be called
a racist? If Zionism was explicitly and in-depth
involved with the Rwanda genocide or the Bosnia
genocide or the ongoing genocide, we should start
going, maybe there's something to that. Not even
maybe. The evidence is provable. You can see
them doing it, but whatever. Bottom line is
I think that might be followed up on
in a pre in upcoming discussion.
This in and of itself is horrible and
needs to be called out.
Now I wanna start with a quick point.
It's just and the only reason I wanna
reiterate this is because I keep making this
point, and sadly enough I'm glad I remember
this now. A show a show before last
I just did. I I've done this before
and I've I'll wait. I kick myself when
I make this I I may I have
notes going off and, you know, or rather
alarms and things I set to make sure
I don't forget this every day is that
I forget to save the tabs.
Show before last, some crazy turn of events,
I forgot to save all the tabs. I've
already saved the ones from today. And I
got done with the show, and I closed
them as I go, and I lost all
the tabs. So same as always, guys. You
can watch the show. The screen the URL
is right there. You can see it as
I go. So you can take the time
to type it out if you want. So
it is there, technically still there if you
wanna find the things, but the links are
not on the show. So I apologize about
that.
The point was one of them was a
show where I went super in-depth on The
USA spending overlap.
And it kills me that you still get
this pushback. Like, I comment about this and
people go, that's crazy. You're a lunatic. You're
a left crazy lunatic or whatever. The reality
is Donald Trump is currently spending money or
rather again I say that because it's important
to get people to frame it how they
see you know, what what's important to them.
It is just your US government. That I
see no different than either side. But in
this current Trump administration,
they are still, right this moment, funding to
the to tune of, what, 30 plus billion
million dollars,
AIDS prevention and male circumcision in Africa right
now.
And the reason I even bring it up
again is because I keep getting pushed back
on this like it's not true. So please,
guys, put this out there. So first and
I'm gonna show it to you show them
to you yet again for these people that
are pushing back like we're making things up
as they call it out on one side.
The USAID point is overlapped with this, so
I wanna highlight this as well. We just
talked about it.
Oh, and here is,
the show.
Oh, here. Damn it. Let's just go to
the website. So the point is we just
talked about USAID. It's allegedly closing down again.
Again, with the for the second time, even
though neither time it's actually what's happening. Here's
the show. I'll include it for the show
notes. But as I said then, I said
they're they're just like Alex Jones. I called
him out for it. That's this one here.
And I simply so he says, Trump strikes
again,
which if it didn't close down last time
or or in fact that you have to
close it this time even though it didn't
again, why would it be strikes again if
if you're talk you know, whatever. Or maybe
they're just claiming other things or accounting for
that. So state department says it's officially shutting
down USAID.
Again, would make that seem like it didn't
happen the first time, but the point is
that it didn't shut down again.
And I I just cite directly from a
report on the memo. You guys, you could
look up the memo from the state department.
And there's no one trying to hide this
other than the people trying to frame it
dishonestly.
And it says the state department will seek
to retire
USAID's independent
operation
immediately and assess whether to rehire some of
the unknown number of the officials to, quote,
assume the responsibility,
responsible administration
of USAID's
remaining life saving and strategic aid programs.
Now read further.
Guys, if you call I did I went
over it in-depth in the show I'm pointing
to. It says very clearly that this is
not they're simply, like we already told you
before, moving it under the state department.
So you could argue that that's shutting down
the independent operation. They're very clear about the
same administration of USAID
and the way it's applied, even using the
same name apparently.
At this point still as far as I
could tell still, and yet we're still getting
the same old report because that's what is
advantageous for the partisanship.
I said wrong or dishonest yet again, Alex.
It's just more shell game. They are not
shutting down USAID. They are simply repurposing it
and moving it under the state
other words, admitting what it has always been
and effectively giving it to a larger budget.
Think about that.
It's just simply being I think the point
is it's always been like that, and they
just have numbers they show you. At the
end of the day, it's just now become
more of a black budget operation, which is
what it's always really been.
Here's the show.
And I'm gonna follow-up in the next show,
by the way, about the RFK blackmail kind
of facade that's going around. And that's not
to say he's not being blackmailed. It's this
weird sidestep argument that didn't really have any
backup, any evidence that we talked about in
the show. And now they're even kinda doubling
down on it with no evidence. It just
seems like a really weird thing that's going
on around that and not unexpected, but just
very odd timing anyway.
But so then you get these this follow-up
the next day, and not Jerome Powell does
the same thing. Trump did it. And then
Wall Street Mavs says USAID was officially officially
shut down. And see, people look at this
account with a million, whatever it is,
you know, 1,600,000.
That as gospel. That's facts. Like, there were
we are the media now. Right? That this
is enough. That's your source. Mav says on
Twitter, they shut it down. They didn't, though.
It's infuriating. That's what I said. Incorrect, but,
you know, no one cares.
Oh, and and so this is where the
connection comes from. I just wanna make sure
you saw that again. That's the kind of
misrepresentation you're getting. So this one shows this
meme. I know. Almost upsettingly
bastardizing
the the giving tree, which is a fantastic
book. It says USAID on the tree, and
then it shows this apple dropping saying condoms.
And down here, it says gay Mozambique and
squirrels.
They're they're trying to be funny, which it
is funny in its own right outside of
the partisan game. And my point though is
this is trying to say that that's what
they're stopping. Okay.
Well, here again for the third, fourth time
is
I HIV response in
Pupuani,
basically, around Africa and specifically Tanzania. Now that's
just specifically AIDS,
what do they call it? AIDS
prevention,
which is for $12,000,000.
That's that's
beginning of this month. Now that begins to
overlap with specifically
increased coverage of of services including voluntary male
circumcision.
Now you this is specifically about AIDS prevention.
I already talked about this. This is $14,500,000.
Now if you take the time to look
into the Mozambique claim, what was it for?
HIV prevention. That's what it was.
Okay. So the same exact thing is being
funded right now.
Where are all the screening conservatives going? You're
lying. This is or, obviously, you know that's
not gonna happen. Here is another one. So
now we're at what? $30,000,000?
This is
and some of these started under his administration.
This some of these overlap. This one is
from the HHS. That's under RFK Junior, and
it says, same thing, male circumcision.
This one's for 15,600,000.0.
Provision of voluntary male circumcision
in South Africa.
Oh, there it is. So just but, again,
the people that are screaming I'm lying probably
already knew I wasn't, but just either way,
get it out there.
Take credit for it. I don't care. Make
a clip. Put a make a make a
meme and tag me. I'll share it. The
point is this is ridiculously
hypocritical for them to be making these huge
claims and vans and every one of them
use the same buzzword and Mozambique circumcision on
every show they do. And they either know
or don't know, which is almost I don't
know, which is more alarming, and it's still
happening. And that's my point, guys. This is
not even about one thing or the other.
It's about the narrative. It's about the outcome.
It's about using a regime change engine or
infiltrating governments or using it for Israel to
do the same.
And some places, those narratives still work like
in Africa. Why? Because they are dealing with
HIV issues. And at least as the narrative
goes, and the point is that that is
an easy way for them to work their
way in under our guise of helping them.
And in some cases, they provide things that
people need. Doctors on the ground go good.
They're bringing what we need to help them.
So it's it opens the door.
Simple as that. But all the parts and
screamers don't care. Now let's talk about AI
and xAI overlap.
This is important because we already talked about
this more than once. This is about the
idea of the transition,
the quiet transition from DARPA's XAI to Elon's
XAI. We wrote this through did the show
12/24/2024.
So as you might have already seen on
the twenty eighth that was reported, Elon Musk
says XAI has purchased
Twitter,
formerly known as Twitter. Excuse me. That didn't
sound right. X, formerly known as Twitter, for
$33,000,000,000.
So he just basically
I mean, personally, I find that a bit
weird.
Not I mean, not
alone, it would be weird. If he was
just a random guy who sold his own
company to himself, it just seems like a
weird way that I guarantee there's some kind
of weird,
you know, money. I don't even know. I'm
not trying to accuse anybody. I don't know.
My point is that that seems like a
rife a situation rife with potential for for
criminal activity. But the point is that he's
also currently part of the government. They're also
currently working on an AI direction. Okay. So
that's huge. It's rife with conflicts of interest.
But, again, it seems that his don't matter.
He no one seems to pretend that he
has any potential issue or even if he
does, it doesn't matter, which all of that's
false. The guy is literally one of the
most powerful people in the current government administration,
and we all know that. And yet we're
ignoring the fact that he's being strung up
by Israel or, you know, puppeteered or the
fact that he has an unreal amount of
conflicts of interest. And most of which he
probably don't even know because he never had
to apply you know, put out any ethics
pledges like most of his administration right now.
This is important though because let's not forget,
xAI
was a DARPA program,
the explainable AI, which in which the research
on this ended months before he bought Twitter
and then a couple months later started XAI.
I argue it already was going on. I
argue it was already working on this. The
point is this is the same program.
So that's first point where you already watched
the transition from an yet another military government
program through yet another military contractor rolled out
as some helping program, like like Palantir from
Total Information Awareness or many others.
That's the way they repackage it for you,
and it seems the right just can't stop
getting it. Get they just can't take enough
of these programs pretending they're fighting the left's
great reset. Right?
But this is concerning for more than that.
So, obviously, DARPA's military program about using AI
and infiltrating your life is part of what's
going on. But let's not forget, they're using
Twitter to train these AI models. That's been
a public acknowledgment.
So now as he sells it over into
XAI,
rather say, it's it's one and the same.
So now it now I mean, I would
argue that there's a lot more potential issue,
but I might I guess, first and foremost,
they've already been doing all of that. So
it's the purchase is just kind of showing
you what's already been happening. But it gets
more alarming, of course, when you recognize that
the AI direction is what this government is
rolling out. And whether they wanna point to
OpenAI or xAI, I think they're all in
the same direction working on the same project.
I think there's different parts of it. I
think you pretty much prove that when you
all show all the overlaps right now with
Palantir, xAI, OpenAI, while they pretend like they're
all fighting each other, it doesn't make any
sense. So the bigger issue is that you
know for a fact that Twitter is completely
infiltrated
by Israeli startup intelligence entities like Authentix and
CHEQ,
who have been proving that every day.
These are hypotheticals. You can prove these things.
And, yeah, especially on TEDx, it's completely on
the record tapped into Israeli intelligence, and he's
working with them to steal your biometrics on
Twitter. Or, excuse me, use them for verification
even though they don't need those right now
for Twitter's verification. Certainly makes sense.
So that should be definitely concerning with how
much more we continue to see this.
Now he says right here that he sold
it. Here's what he says on on the
this is what they wrote about it on
New York Times. Elon Musk said on Friday
that he sold x Twitter to his social
media comp his social media company to XAI.
The
a a artificial intelligence startup he founded in
2023
in an unusual arrangement that may raise conflict
of interest questions. I mean, it's obvious.
But he says, XAI and X's future are
intertwined.
Today, we officially take the step to combine
the data, models, compute, distribution, and talent. Now
I'm willing to bet you that this has
always been the case. This is just them
revealing it to you. That's my opinion. Mister
Musk wrote in the post, the combined company
will deliver smarter, more meaningful experiences to billions
of people while staying true to our core
mission of seeking truth and advancing knowledge. Is
that the core mission of xAI? Is it
the core mission of Twitter? I mean, I
guess that would be nice to hear if
that was the truth. I think we all
know it's not the truth, but doesn't that
seem like a weird mission for a social
media company?
Should shouldn't the mission be to allow you
to speak what you want in a free
speech platform even though it's not what it
is? Or about an AI company? Should the
AI company be seeking truth and advancing knowledge?
I mean, that makes more sense. But this
is a function. It's a it's a computation.
Like, I think it's weird for them to
be putting this intent on top of things
that either on one side should be what
you wanna put out there and the other
side being something that should not have intent
involved at all. But I think it's about
framing it to you as the good thing,
fighting for good reasons always.
Because right now, people buy it because they
want to.
Either way,
combining these things is a there's a lot
of personal information that's being overlapped here in
a lot of pretty alarming ways. Let's not
forget that XAI is involved with a lot
of national multi like, international
interests.
Huge moneyed interests that have no concern whatsoever
for your free speech, for your privacy.
This administration has made that clear.
Your privacy in regard to what they're again,
let's not forget, they're using government models right
now. Trillion dollar databases to train their model.
That has now come out to train this
model.
So my point is that even this administration,
they said your privacy was basically an afterthought.
It goes on to say that two Musk
companies already share significant resources. The artificial intelligence
models of XAI are trained on data posted
on Twitter.
Now posted or everything on there? I I
think it's pretty obvious if they're using personal
data behind the scenes from the government with
no real allowance that they probably are doing
the same on their company. But it says
last month, bankers told Twitter investors
that some of the social media's revenue came
from XAI.
Yeah. So behind the scenes, it's already been
overlapping. So this is, I think, a a
shell game.
But suggest you see that, the combination of
the two, I find that concerning. Maybe you
don't. But here's an interesting overlap. Grok reveals
so his intel his AI, like, a bot
says,
Musk has, quote, been trying to tweak my
responses
after AI bot repeatedly labels him a top
misinformation spreader. This is from a couple days
ago.
You can't really I mean, you can't disregard
that. So if Grok is going, Elon's trying
to change what I'm saying, then I'm pretty
sure that's what's happening. Or I guess the
argument would be that he made it say
that, which wouldn't make much sense. It's kinda
easy to see.
Is anybody confused by that? I mean, is
that shocking to anybody? I mean, even the
people that are trying to pretend he's not
doing that, you all kinda know that's what
we've already seen examples of him kind of
have meltdowns and tantrums and do things that
you all know he's not supposed to do,
that you all claim he's not doing.
So this is just insane. So now we're
rolling into a massive AI direction where he's
actively trying to manipulate the outcome of the
data from his truth seeking knowledge based thing.
I guess truth seeking knowledge than the way
he wants it to be presented.
Here's another example. Elon Musk, quote, pressured Reddit
CEO to remove Doge Post. Not the same
conversation, but just to get the sense of
where these people are in minds are at.
How can you possibly frame yourself as a
free speech hero while everything you do seems
to be trying to tailor the content to
how you want it to be seen and
trying to get people not to do I
mean, it it speaks for itself. You know,
you're either honest and you could acknowledge this
or you're trying to hide from it because
you're not. That I I I mean, nothing
is ever that binary. There's always nuance, but
that seems to be the majority of the
conversation for me.
Again,
you have to be aware of how concerning
this is with the great reset overlap, with
the the the tech knock, everything. I mean,
you name it what you want. The direction,
they've been going forever in regard to DARPA.
The the
even just take it from the health side
of it. The mRNA injection, the internal the
internal,
nano what do they call it? The,
internal nano platforms.
These are all direct state terms that we've
covered on this platform from DARPA. Whitney wrote
an article about this before the COVID nineteen
explosion right in the beginning about all the
dark secrets. Actually, that's, like, what it's called.
I wasn't sure if I remember the the
title.
It's entitled coronavirus gives
a boost to DARPA's darkest agendas.
And Seth, I mentioned it, like, in in
vivo nano platforms. Remember, I mean, this is
basically the mRNA platform, but they designed it
in your body.
That's the point.
I mean, I argue I argue that maybe
what in fact already happened, and we just
weren't told that.
Either way, a lot of these things, the
living foundries. I'm not gonna go with it
now because I'll read this, and I'll dive
into it. It's fascinating and horrifying at the
same time. But this is, I mean, next
generation nonsurgical neuro neurotechnology.
We've referenced what's his name many times. Open
discussions well past COVID nineteen time frame. In
fact,
James
Giordano, I think his name was. He's an
expert for the government, and he openly said
on the record that he thinks the government
did these things during COVID nineteen.
That's insane.
So I'll include that too.
So the point there is just to consider
that what they're doing is rolled into something
much more alarming. Right? It's not just
the backgrounds,
research. They're literally rolling just like they did
with total information awareness, another program into your
face that overlaps with all of it. Don't
forget,
Elon Musk is telling you that they want
you to do AI doctors. Right? You know
who else is telling you that?
Bill Gates.
Right now, at the same exact time, both
of them are telling you that's your future.
Weird how the conspiracy theorists of the crowd
don't seem to worry about that even though
we were just screaming Bill Gates should be
arrested, like, thirty seconds ago, and now he's
part of the Unity team.
Now this is another overlap, of course, and
this is where you bring in Grok and
Palantir. Palantir being total information awareness. You can
see the connection. This says Palantir has bought
has brought Grok to the enterprise.
Now officially available on AIP.
And Elon Musk says, cool.
Oh, great. So now Palantir has intertwined itself
with Grok, which already was the case, and
x a I, and and through that x
and through that Elon Musk. Well, let's not
forget it's already been that way. So do
you think this is a shift, or is
this simply them revealing, pulling the curtain back,
and what we've all been telling you was
there?
Interesting to think about. Right? Either way, Palantir
overlapped with exactly what we've always been highlighting.
This is one blob right now.
That's concerning as hell to me. And he
cool, he says.
And this guy even says, no. It's not
no. It's not nor our Palantir cool.
I I don't think half the people he
support that support him agree with most of
what's happening. They just choose to pretend it's
an excuse for it. And here's Martin Gack
simply highlighting, that's an article, in, Germany, saying,
apparently, Germany is trying to hand over the
keys to police data, sound familiar,
and information to Trump's master, he calls it,
Peter Thiel, the architect and owner of much
of Israel's genocide machine. This this is real.
It's happening. And so the point here under
the article titled, anyone who buys software from
Peter Thiel really didn't doesn't understand anything.
And it's it's you it's all the things
you already know. Read the article. They're basically
saying what we know about this. This is
concerning. These people have tapped into some of
the worst things in the world proudly.
And now that's overlapped with Grok. It's brought
it into the fold.
Twitter, basically,
DARPA.
I mean, what just technocracy.
And this is the this is the guy
that's tapped into Trump's administration from the top.
And this is, Derek just did a great
article going over the acolytes throughout the administration,
meet the acolytes in Donald Trump's second administration.
I'll also include for you the the follow-up,
which was about the ideology
that they all seem to espouse, which is
from Curtis Yarvin.
But the point, guys, is this is very
clear who is guiding this bus. Just like
it was very clear that Citibank
largely was a backing up, but I think
it's bigger than that at the time. But
the point is of Obama. Or, you know,
you can go forward and see this. Israel
and and Palantir
seem to be central in this conversation today,
and I think that's representative of everything we're
seeing. You think that's just a coincidence that
they're the biggest two conversation on the planet?
No. It's not because they're just behind Trump.
It's because of what they're doing elsewhere. And
it just so happens that those two things
are like the primary representation behind Trump.
Well, it's worth thinking
about,
isn't
it?
But I agree. Anyone who buys software or
works overlapping with them and allows them access
to your information
doesn't understand anything
or doesn't care to. And his point about
the genocide, we'll play this yet again, it
should be very concerning to you that we
know
that that as court to Israeli media,
that Israel's using AI to murder people on
the ground. This one's called the AI machine
directing Israel's bombing spree, Lavender. This one's called
a mass assassination factor, which is a direct
quote from an IDF member reporting to them
what's going on.
And, of course, when asked about that, here
was his response.
What do you think about the use of
artificial
intelligence or Lavender
by the IDF in
identifying
Hamas targets?
And secondly, do you agree with Elon Musk
about that the population decline is a risk
for humanity?
Look, I yeah. I'm not I'm not,
you know, I
you know, with without
without,
going into all the deep you know, I
I'm not on top of all the details
of what's going on in Israel because my
my bias is to defer to Israel. It's
it's it's not for us to
to second guess
every, everything. And
I believe that
broadly the IDF gets to decide, what it
wants to do and that they're broadly in
the right. And that's that's sort of the
the perspective
I come back to. And if I if
I fall into the trap of,
arguing you on every detailed point, I'm actually
gonna I would actually be conceding
the the broader issue that, the Middle East
should be micromanaged from Cambridge. And I think
that's
just simply absurd.
And so I'm not I'm not gonna concede
that point.
And what was your the other
Now I wish I had the better quality
because, yeah, how much he's sweating is also
very relevant. But, you know, just just for
an ex mental experiment,
watch that again, and every time he says
Israel, insert Nazi Germany and see how that
flushes out. Now see, if immediately go, that's
not the same thing. Well, yes. By the
prince
in principle, it is. Doesn't matter because so
he believes they're doing the right thing. Well,
plenty of people felt that way about any
terrible thing that happened in the world, whether
because they're also disgusting or they have an
interest in it. Whatever it is, there are
people that would argue that that was, you
know, there. I defer to them. And what
were they saying? Well, we're on the right
because this is a problem. Okay. So, deferring
to the people involved is willful ignorance or
you're you're part of the problem.
And and even if they're doing the right
thing, you are simply allowing them to make
the narrative for what you want to have.
You know why that's happening, guys.
It's
transparent.
Now this,
this shout out to,
was it Swampy Uniparty? I'm gonna follow-up. This
is, Ian Carroll's kind of follow-up. Alright. This
was oh, no. Never mind. This is not
the follow. This is the first one about
the black. I'm not gonna get in today.
This person shared it underneath that. I was
gonna include it today. That's why I had
it up there first, but we'll come back
to it in another show. I just want
you guys to see the follow-up in this
conversation, which seems really fishy to me. But
Swamp says, everyone who I've come to respect
in the political sphere has ended up being
a traitor or at least seems like they
are. Where are all the good guys? Sadly,
it feels that way sometimes. And he highlights
this, which I think is important. And this
was this is actually a shout out to
him is where I got
that the article I just simply searched for
this headline or the the the phrase, and
it says AI
and xAI or rather xAI and x are
intertwined like we read. And he goes on
to say, Palantir funded by CIA and Peter
Thiel, which is actually on the record, by
the way, guys. It's not even a secret.
Integrated with Grok earlier this year.
We've been warned this is a Trojan horse.
Interesting. And this we just showed you that,
guys. That's what's happening. And it says the
plan has been to merge state and corporate
powers to create a surveillance techno state. They're,
like, salivating about this. Many of them are
publicly telling you I mean, Andreessen just said
this on Joe Rogan, guys, that we need
that.
It says, and Elon Musk will be techno
king. He said that about himself.
Not a joke.
Now it says, let's not forget Larry Ellison
and project Stargate. His company was also funded
by the CIA. Also very easy to prove.
I don't fully understand the plan, he goes,
but I'm starting to see the dots connecting.
Get slightly concerned. And then he rightly says,
as time goes on, Whitney Webb seems to
be right about everything. Indeed.
Now, really, guys, you need to understand how
concerning it is. This is all all the
things that we are highlighting for you as
possible, you know, like, almost like future steps
or rather what we think is there, now
there's currents are pulling back. And in some
cases, framing it as a new thing even
though you can prove it's always been there.
That's kinda what we see everywhere right now.
So this is important to understand.
And, of course, with the overlap of the
Stargate Oracle discussion. Now I'm gonna in a
in a upcoming probably, probably tomorrow. I can't
guarantee tomorrow based on some of the prep
for the thing for the the,
carnival.
The point is that there's an Oracle story.
I might be able to just grab it
real quick and show you.
Yeah. Here we go. I think, I think
it was Orwell that shared this with me.
Well, I'll follow-up on this in more detail.
But this is the same kind of point
right now is that Oracle apparently also had
a major data breach right alongside Twitter, which
tells you something, that that just recently we
had that whole thing with Twitter.
And it turns out they completely covered up
that they did have a breach.
Now think about that, guys, in the context
of
make sure I didn't include it and forget.
In the context
of Stargate.
Right? So we literally have Oracle using Red
Ellison
using, as he told you, the data they
scooped from you during COVID nineteen
using
Oracle
that they swore wouldn't be used like this,
and they just got a huge data hack.
Think about how wild that is. Now the
question is, was it actually a hack?
So first point is that happening is a
big deal with this much overlap, this much
influence, this much infiltration
into personal databases.
On top of that, we know what else
is happening in the larger, you know, technocratic
great reset building.
But on but the bigger stepping back point
is, was this even an accident?
Was this more about trying to normalize the
idea that we don't really need privacy anymore?
Now that's I'm just that's just a thought.
Not to say that that's what any data
point that's pointing that direction other than their
past actions.
But very worth considering. Right? Because
I think there's a very clear effort right
now building in a direction that we're that,
you know, maybe just by accidental default. Well,
here we are now. So let's you see
what I'm saying? And I think that's usually
how this goes.
Now hacker has it up for sale even
though Oracle tried to hide the fact that
they were compromised.
And then coming to today,
200 you know what's funny? I'm actually thinking
right now. I didn't even stop and think
today. I mean, I you know, I always
do my deep my due diligence. I would
never just report in the headline without doing
it, but it's like, I wonder if there's
anybody out there doing some elaborate April fools.
I always forget about that. I I also
think it's one of the most irritating holidays
that's out there. It's Steve's birthday today. It's
not April fools. It's because people play some
of the most nasty I mean, on on
a funny I guess it's funny. On a
side note, when I was in school,
a friend of mine that I played sports
with
care did one of the worst jokes I've
ever seen in my life. He literally convinced
on there's somebody who knew he knew was
homesick,
and he convinced everybody at school that he
had died that day,
legitimately. And it was like people were crying,
and this guy is kind of a bad
person. But, you know, think think how crazy
that is. And he was like, just kidding.
April fools. I'm like, nobody laughed. That's that's
horrible. So probably one of the reasons I
think it's about all day. It's just insane.
But back to the point,
Forbes reports, as of today, 200,000,000
Twitter user records released.
2,800,000,000
Twitter IDs leaked.
Yep.
Elon Musk, social media platform Twitter, is no
stranger to the news. It says, with what
with the reported purchase of Twitter we just
talked about? And it says, now another shock
awaits the users of what will be Twitter,
a self proclaimed data enthusiast,
that's what he's calling himself, just gave away
what is claimed to be a database containing
details of some 200,000,000
Twitter user records. So, again,
is that because they,
you know, oopsie, we've lost it? I mean,
if that's the case, that's irrelevant in its
own right. Why are we trusting these people
with this much information who don't seem to
care at all and even more so can't
even protect it if they want to? But
on top of that, I think there's another
question to ask, whether there's a weird kind
of normalcy happening here, whether, like, driving to
that to where, you know, it's not no
one it's not necessary.
You know there's an issue with that. I
mean, even Elon Musk had made a big
statement about de anonymizing people for the platform.
Right? It's interesting to think about.
Now you can read more about this. The
guy is thinking one is basically saying, no.
I'm not I mean, he goes, I'm a
data enthusiast,
not really a a hacker. I'm just trying
to show the truth. But he did release
personal information. So it's kind of you know,
you can decide for yourself.
Now
I wanna start with this on this segment
again
because it's important to set the tone because
it is frustrating that we have to fight
against either, you know,
intentionally misinformed people. And I mean that from
that side of people misinforming
them. And I do believe it's very deliberate
from the side of people invested in a
certain narrative to defend a certain person.
But I wanna reiterate this. Just and I
I an example that I think is more
important, but this one first is coming from,
a Scalia ruling for Reno versus Flores.
And the point is
the fifth amendment entitles aliens, of course, to
due process.
And this is from a Republican judge, so
that's why I think it's more relevant for
some people. But it says it's well established.
He in his in his ruling that the
fifth amendment entitles aliens to due process. K?
It shouldn't even be contentious. I don't even
understand why. If you understand the constitution being
something that applies to anybody,
that's how it was written. And there are
specifics that then apply only to American citizens,
and it's notated that way. The reality, though,
is the bigger picture
is all the people
are endowed by the creator within time, you
know, inalienable ride. This is the reality that
people lean into when it suits their interest
within the two party illusion.
But that's not the this is just the
one I'll reiterate because it's I think it's
the most impactful of people that wanna push
back, and it's only a it's a left
leaning judge or whatever. And I am gonna
follow-up on that important pot top, topic
in one of the next few shows around
the judge, the bribery of it, the aspect
of how it works. We had a great
conversation with, Bruce Fine and Jeffrey on BitShoot
about that because Fine being an expert in
the topic.
But I'm gonna follow-up more on it because
I think it's an important and alarming conversation.
There's obviously radically
politically motivated people in every field in this
country, guys. It does not change the fact
that by pointing at that, that you can
just then disregard everything else. We'll get to
an overlap with the deportations.
But this is important, but I wanna include,
first, again, just ask Brave. Okay? Do noncitizens
have right to due process? Yes. Noncitizens, including
undocumented immigrants, another way to say that would
be illegal aliens, have the right to due
process under The US constitution. But I find
this one to be a little more important
for people that, I guess, believe that Twitter
is more important, you know, has the information.
So here's Twitter. Here's Grok for you. Do
noncitizens have the right to due process?
Yes. Noncitizens
in The United States generally have the right
to due process under the constitution. The fifth
and fourteenth amendment, that's what we've been discussing,
guarantee due process to, quote, all persons,
not just citizens.
Courts have consistently interpreted this to include noncitizens
whether they are legally present or not. So
first of all, that is the easily proven
reality from the actual text. Then you've got
the repeatedly held up idea from supreme court,
including from republican justices. I mean, I don't
even know why we have to argue this,
but, you know, I know why because Vance
and Trump
and Noem and all the rest of them
are screaming the false point. So you get
a lot of uninformed people that go along
with the power structure even though they believe
they're fighting the deep state. Now it says,
for example, the Supreme Court in another case,
it's,
Zed Zedvidas versus Davis two thousand one affirmed
that due process applies to aliens
within G U US jurisdiction,
emphasizing that the government must follow fair procedures
before
depriving anyone of life, liberty, property. Another very
important ruling that explicitly highlight the problem today.
So everything they're doing, you could argue, is
legally correct, except they did not give people
due process. And you see, that's what trips
them up. Because had they done that, then,
oh my god, they'd have to actually prove
that they're criminals. Now why would they even
why wouldn't they want to make that case?
Why wouldn't they want to demonstrate? Look at
all the gang members that Biden let in.
Wouldn't that be important for you to highlight
that and lean into the what we believe
in this country and show that they're criminals
and make sure you're no. You see, they're
not the good guy in the conversation. Not
Biden. Not Trump. They're the ones that feign
to be that and then do everything they
can to hide the reality.
It's like we say with foreign policy. If
you give them cluster munitions to use because
they used them first, well, then you're just
as bad. That's Biden. That's Trump. It's the
same conversation.
If you wanted to profess to be you
know, do what you profess you are, well,
then you would not do that. You would
say they're using illegal weapons, and we're showing
the world how it's supposed to be done.
No. But that's not who these people are.
But, also, again, the point to make is
they know that that's what we want.
That's why that's obvious that most people in
this countries are generally wanting good things out
of this, and that's why they want you
to think, you know, it's always the same
game. I believe most Americans are generally in
the same direction when it comes to what
really matters, and they just convince us that
we hate each other. And then, of course,
there's the, like, the rapidly
uninformed and aggressive and and and just bad
people out there that are being promoted in
this administration or rather just in this government
on all sides of it. And, you know,
the left and the right difference, but it's
the same kind of bad people with no
real morals and in principles and integrity. They
seem to be having a boon today. But
it says, noncitizens
accused of crimes, however,
get the same procedural safeguards as citizens,
like a fair trial and legal representation. The
point is there's nuance as we've highlighted. Certain
circle again, if let's just say they blew
up a building. Right? And they were the
evidence was presented, and it was shown that
they were criminals.
They argue with the well, I mean, I
guess that's even different. The point is that
there's precedent, which I this this is a
conversation to have,
whether that should even be on the table.
But in the past, where you have examples,
I guess I mean, you you could always
show this new one. This is why no
matter what the conversation, due process.
Always.
And the moment they started going, well, national
security. Well, because terrorism, they are manipulating you.
Even if that's true, why would it hurt
to actually give due process for everybody and
show that you're because they know they can
abuse it?
My point, though, is that you can argue
precedent, and that's why they're trying to claim
everything's a terrorist because that's how they can
show previous precedent. I would still argue you
go back as far as you want that
this is undermining the constitution.
But regardless, the point is, regardless of any
of that, it says, noncitizens
accused of crimes.
Still applies regardless of the nuance. That's the
one that really matters.
So just because they scream national security, it
doesn't change the point that they should still
present the evidence and they should still claim
that they're you know, show and prove that
they are criminals. If they're not doing that,
that should make you wonder whether they have
evidence at all. Now it says there's debate
around this, especially with undocumented immigrants or during
national security situations, whatever that abstract term means,
where some argue for exceptions. K. Here's the
important part from Grock.
That's where we are. Right? And this is
why I always say, whether you want free
speech or limited speech, the point is those
are being discussed right now.
Just the pushback does not suddenly make it
not reality. So they're saying, yes. We are
arguing for exceptions.
But, legally,
the principle stands.
If you're on US soil, citizenship
isn't a prerequisite for basic due process or
is isn't a prerequisite for due process, meaning
you get due process regardless.
I hope that rings true with people that
need to hear that right now, especially because
it came from Grock, if that means any
more to you.
Now
I wanna talk about this the rest of
the show. This is why I guess the
end part's gonna be some overlap with some
Israel connection because it's very obvious this is
being done for Israel. That's not even debatable.
They're openly telling you it's about criticizing Israel,
so that shouldn't even be a debate.
And that's incredible
because that's ideological control. That is not what
this country pretends it is. That's censorship. That's
I mean, everything you could point to, guys,
that is the undermining of numerous constitutional rights
because Israel.
Weird exactly what we told you would happen.
Why? Well, because Trump literally said so
over and over and over, over and over
and over, but, no, I guess nobody wanted
to listen.
Now, again, I'm being facetious. I know plenty
of you were. My point is that a
lot of the people in
powerful and influential
social media positions,
you know, they saw a lot of money
coming in, or they were always a Zionist.
I mean, you can decide for yourself.
Don't assume, but consider.
Now media writes, that's horrific.
Joe Rogan sounds the alarm on Trump possibly
deporting innocent people. This kills me. K, this
was yesterday. So here's the thing. You can
I mean, if I was telling you this
week and a half ago because the evidence
was there, and I'm gonna show you the
guy who really is doing a bulk of
the work here?
Oh, that's too far. This guy. And I'm
a play a great clip from him despite
people already trying to frame it as left
and right. I mean, at least he says
it's a nonpartisan group. I guarantee they all
have partisanship. The point is regardless of that,
what he shows you is easily proven.
And and he's doing a great job. And
I'm we'll come back to it. He's breaking
down. This is the guy I already showed
you from before, showing you the affidavit,
presented to court, showing you this guy already
had asylum, and and now it's been admitted.
So before that, though, everyone was calling you
a racist, Muslim supporter, terrorist. Oh, oopsie. I
guess it was. So we'll stop saying that.
No. They keep saying it, even though it's
true, that he was here legally and was
deported without a criminal record. That was the
first one. And now we've got a waterfall
because it seems this was pretty flimsy. I
argue because they didn't even have the evidence
for I mean, really, any of them.
I think it's about, as I think it
was Jeffrey or Bruce, the point is just
getting the numbers. Because they have a quota
to me. They're telling you that. We plan
to get ready get rid of this many
I think you said a hundred thousand,
And now they I guess they're just trying
to reach that. But, again, that's you could
decide why. The point is this is happening.
And so as they sit here yesterday
going,
you know, alarmed that it might have been
happening, how are this is what frustrates people
like me,
when we can prove it, that it's out
there. And yet, you know, Ryan over here
with his home studio talking about his computer.
But, no, the entire sub media apparatus and
all the mainstream alternative media with billions in
funding across the board can't seem to piece
that together, or are they all lying to
you? It's
both, though. The point is we know for
a fact that there have been innocent,
legally present people deported,
period,
well before yesterday, and they're debating about weather,
and it kills me. But at least they're
doing that. But here's the point. I think
they're doing this to let us let steam
out. To one, make it seem like it's
abstract. It's not for sure. We don't know.
That's trying to water down what they know
was already getting out.
You could decide to do my opinions on
the intention.
Regardless,
this is what's being discussed. And so even
though even the right side of the conversation,
well, whatever you wanna place Rogen, the point
is I think that's why this is happening
from the all of it, not left or
right, but he plays that role, is trying
to
kind of you know, it'll
release a little bit of it like, yes.
No. It's kinda happening because it's already out,
but in a way to kinda bury it
and and and overall,
we now know many of them are there.
If not I mean, for this point, I
don't have I actually haven't seen any single
one of them proven to actually be part
of any of these things. I find it
hard to believe that none of them would
be. I mean, I don't even know why
I would say that. I think it's I
I guess the reason I would say that
is because I can't believe that they would
do all of this with literally no evidence
for any of them, but I guess that's
where we are. It's certainly possible. But I'd
like to see even one of them proven
to actually be a gang member. Wouldn't that
be nice?
But here's what it says.
And this is an interview we had with,
what's his name? Crosston, team, Kotkeisen,
somebody you know, they're all I don't have
a high opinion, but he says, and there's
probably
still people coming through that they're criminals. This
is Joe Rogan.
You know? This is Joe Rogan praising the
Trump administration for bringing down the number of
migrants crossing the border illegally.
I guess. I mean, you know what? So
is it the idea that scare people that
you're gonna end up in a prison whether
you're guilty or not because you're I mean,
let's realize that whether this is kinda a
point from before. Just read just a second
ago.
If we have a law in the books
that says you can come into this country
and present yourself to the the border crossing,
which is what a lot of people are
doing and and declaring for asylum.
Venezuela being a clear point overlap, we'll kinda
get to in a second. There are people
going, look. Our our country is destroyed.
I can't feed my family. I can't find
a job. Now that's because of what The
US did, and they proudly did that. They
made it clear. We were doing the okay.
Now even if you disagree, if you think
it's Maduro, it's the same point. The reality
is that they fled
either because their government was bad or our
government created the situation, which is the clear
truth. But either way, the point is that's
why that exists. So they come here and
they go I mean, the whole claim. Right?
We they come here for freedom and liberty
even though it's not true today. The point
is they come and they clear asylum, and
then some of them get it. But the
point is, in that process, many of them
were scooped up and took away.
And it's not like they snuck under a
fence somewhere. Yes, that does exist. But many
of those people that are trying to go
through the process, the legal process.
And so they're all claiming they're all illegal
because that's the easy way to get a
bunch of rabid,
uneducated people out there screaming about people they
hate, even though many of them are what
are going for exactly what you always profess
as to you know, this is the dream,
except when you have the wrong color or
you're at the wrong moment in time or
Trump says otherwise or whatever.
It's it's it's disgusting. Now on the other
side of the coin, in case you make
confuse this as a partisan point, you've got
the Biden side of this or rather just
the left illusion of the full government picture
could then do the exact opposite thing. Right?
Allow
more chaos to come. And, actually, this guy
right here actually makes a good point about
this. And that then creates the counterbalance, guys.
Neither of them had the it's it's all
about manufacturing consent.
And at the same time, there's lies about
both of them. You really dig into it.
But he goes on so, basically, Rogen saying,
brought down the people coming in illegally. Now
look. I don't know.
The government can lie about anything.
Do we know that's actually the case? I
wouldn't dispute it. That's probably the probably the
most logical thing. But do we know that?
Did Doge and Brogan
verify that, or did he just look at
the government website?
It's a good it's a question to ask,
guys, because I think we know they lie
all the time. It's not one side or
the other The government lies. I mean, even
Doge is getting caught lying every day. So
I just think it's important. Do we know
they've actually brought it down, or is that
what Vance said on TV? Right? But it
says, but the thing is, like, you got
to get scared that people who are not
criminals are getting, like, lassoed up and deported
and sent to El Salvador prisons.
Like that kind of s h I t.
Because I read some story, Rogan said. Was
it Glenn Greenwald? Yes. Because Glenn has been
screaming about this just as long as I
have because he's a lawyer he he's an
expert in the field of the of constitutional
rights. He's a lawyer on that topic, and
he knows this was wrong from the beginning.
Not because of one political bleeding or the
other, but because even if they were the
worst terrorist in the world, they were they
have due process.
Now it says that and this guy goes,
the gay barber guy? It's scary. Now what's
crazy about it is that that's one of
many he could have been referring to.
And at this moment, you can prove that
they were
illegally deported.
We'll go over these these,
tweets he shares. Now he says, is that
true? Is that story accurate? Rogan replied. And
he goes, I don't I I don't think
we know.
Well done, guys. Well done. Way to way
to water down the story that we could
prove a week ago. But it's not about
the barber, but somebody.
It says, can you explain the story for
people who don't know what it's about?
And by the way, this is why people,
what's indie news and and decensored news, they
make this point about, for example, Ian Carroll
going on Joe Rogan and both of them
understanding and aware of Whitney's work, but nobody
ever trying to get it wrong
or any of us.
Knowing that we've been ahead of these stories,
these major investigation yeah. They're we don't know.
We can't figure it out
or they don't want to.
Not not even to say that that would
be something I want or what she want.
The point is that it's interesting and telling
to show you the information control that maybe
he's not even aware of. Who knows? But
the point is that it's clear.
But he goes, well, from what I read,
I think it was in Time Magazine, Jamie,
or if you could pull it up, maybe
we can get it accurate. Yeah. That'd be
good. But, basically, with a bunch of with
a, with a bunch of these trendy Aragua
guys, allegedly,
they got one guy, at least one guy
who wasn't a criminal, who was just a
gay barber. Who I mean, imagine this, guys.
I mean, just it's insane to think this
overlap makes sense to anybody, especially once we
get more into the details. I will show
you. But he goes, according to the story,
came here legally.
Yes.
Now what do you mean according to so
here's what's even crazier. So you're having this
conversation after you read the article. Okay?
And Time Magazine, and you could read the
information, it's sourced all over the place, is
showing you he's here legally, and this is
what happened. That's provable at this point. It
was provable a while ago.
And so even as they talk about it,
even as he read the article with the
source material, he's going, I don't know. I
don't know for sure, which is fair to
say we don't know. Maybe they could be
lying to us. But you're not you're framing
it as if nobody knows even though we
do.
He says, here was here legally. That's what
they said. He goes, so do they have
a green card? Rogan asked. He goes, I
don't know what the details are. Maybe Jamie
could find out.
He goes, no criminal record? That is very
clearly the case on both accounts. He says,
from what I said in the story,
now this is the problem. Right? Because the
mainstream media has been putting out so much
s h I t that I don't know
what to believe anymore. Right? Joe Rogan goes,
I feel the same way. You know what's
funny about this, guys? Do you know who's
putting out the information that they're referring to
as the ones confusing them? The people that
they support.
This is insane to me. When you look
at this, you know, the media, which I
look. All corporate media,
mainstream alternative media, even the independent media,
you shouldn't be blindly trusting any of these
people. You should be questioning everybody, including ourselves,
everything. But what's incredible to me is they're
highlighting this. So the information they're putting out
that they point to was corporate media. Most
of the corporate media is rightly pointing out
that this is who knows why? I can
see it too. I think it's because that
there it's the it's an agenda that's kind
of the count, the left, right, then that
works for them to come out and say,
no. There's they due process. This was legal
issue.
Okay. So that's clearly not confusing them unless
they're confused by the truth that's coming out
through there. What they're pointing to as what's
confusing them are the mainstream alternative media.
All of them. And and Trump and Vance
and all the rest of them too. So
it's just funny that they frame that as
the corporate media, which by the way is
also part of it, almost always, but they
can't seem to stand back and at least
be honest about the fact that the people
that are confusing them are the people that
they are high standing behind right now in
every possible way.
Then it goes on to say, well, if
you think about it from a government perspective,
and this is where I think it gets
quite sinister, is once you've done that, the
incentive structure is never going to be to
admit that with the and deal with it.
I agree. It says the incentive structure is
to say nothing, to cover it up, to
pretend to pretend it didn't happen,
which is what they're doing. And it gets
way crazier when you overlap this with the
the kind of propaganda stunts they keep doing.
So that's I just wanna start with that,
this weird kind of abstract coverage. Now on
the twenty second of this month, we already
talked about Trump could send Americans to El
Salvador.
That was what he said, and we were
already past the Khalil story, not not over
with it, but that went from there to
the Venezuelan point, the El Salvador point, then
to the point to where he's saying, send
those Tesla domestic terrorists to El Salvador.
Right? And they're they're here yesterday still battling
and and, you know, not sure about things
that have been documented,
released.
That's why people are confused because of people
like you and what you're doing.
Now here is the state department spokesperson, Tammy
Bruce,
blatantly lying about these people.
The secretary also addressed this couple of times
on the trip.
He, he was asked about certain numbers
of visas that were revoked.
He said he didn't know,
but that we'll revoke the visas of whoever
it is that fits within the category of
of what it is we're we're deciding is
going to get your visa revoked, which
So, again, that's the point that last time
she kinda smirked when she says that because
that's idiocy.
That means whatever we decide is what ultimately
is the reality.
Typical government. Right? Now there's laws in place
that matter, guys, and that's really constitutional law.
But all they're trying to pretend is that
we can just argue that that's what the
criteria makes, and if all of a sudden
you're now fit, what we just made up
today, then suddenly you're a problem. Or the
idea is that they change the metrics to
meet the person they wanna remove, which is
exactly what we know is happening. But overall,
none of it matters because it's all illegal,
guys. None of these people broke the law.
That's the lie she's pushing.
Just illegal activity, essentially.
None of the people that I'm about to
refer to, by the way, the one she
references, not in the entire picture. There are
clearly people that were here illegally,
and I imagine people that were actually part
of these gangs, but that hasn't been proven
yet.
And, I I I I do know that,
from our own
conversations
here
that
here we go.
The department, I can say this specifically,
revokes visas every day in order to secure
America's borders and keep our community safe and
will
will continue to do so.
Oh, sorry. I just said and when they
do that, they're legally required to give them
due process and present the evidence that make
that present that backs up the claim that
they're using to deport them. They just leave
that out. That is on the record and
it's facts.
Because the process is ongoing, the number of
revocations, as I've noted, is dynamic,
and the department generally does not, provide statistics
on visa revocations.
Alright.
So the point the main point to focus
on is that she's claiming that they all
broke the law. And Erin Reichland Melnick, who
is a senior fellow at the what was
it again? The, American Immigration Council
says, let's set the record straight.
And we
we we've gone over two of them in
here. Two or more two of them will
go over again more today. But Malm and
Khalil never was never not he's not even
charged with a crime, let alone committed a
crime in the context of what they're highlighting.
Ozturk,
I think I believe it was a brown
doctoral student arrested on the side of the
street with really no no one no warrant
presented, no no identification,
never committed a crime, was never charged a
crime. It's all these are ideological
deportations, guys. It's insane. Everything about that goes
against what we pretend this country believes in.
So here's just to quickly highlight the one
we went over. And and the last show
we did, which we already had it up
here, the, El Salvador deportations show
goes over
five or six four I think four or
five of these.
And we're going over new ones today. So
keep the count running, guys. That's how crazy
this is. But this is the, Tufts International
student,
Rameza
Ozturk.
And the points clearly,
legally here, did not break the law. The
detention comes days after a pro Israel group,
like Batar US, who got Khalil deported because
they asked,
this one's Canary Mission,
said, get rid of her. Why? Because she's
protested against Israel. That's it. There is no
crime here. They're just going, that's terrorism.
It's not. And even if you claim that
I mean, even if you wanna pretend that
you're supporting a terrorist group, as I've said
many times,
there's no crime being committed by support being
on protest to support something. I mean, it's
it's just guys, think of it like this.
Even the KKK
has in many ways been termed a terrorist
group in the past.
And how many times the Supreme Court stood
up for the right for them to have
their protest? But it doesn't matter because they're
trying to change all what they're doing is
finding ways to stop you from criticizing
Israel. And in doing so, building a case
to ignore your rights going forward.
It's obvious. And it says reports have pointed
to an op ed we read in the
last show where she simply calls the university
to acknowledge the Palestinian genocide. And you read
the whole thing. It's measured. It's clear. It's
fact based and not emotional and not partisan
and not
ideological well, not not a crime.
Not saying, we support Hamas or go kill
anybody. They're simply saying, this is a crime,
and we should divest from this because yep.
Just like every other one in the past,
like South Africa and apartheid.
Now it says glorifying and supporting terrorists who
kill Americans as grounds for visa issuance to
be terminated.
Well, it's not, in fact. And the bottom
line, though, is that they have to prove
that if they're going to make that claim.
They didn't do that. That's the same point
across the board.
If you wanna claim they're supporting terrorists, well,
first, the problem the reason they can't do
this is because they know that most of
these judges are gonna go, what are we
talking about? Are they support did they send
weapons to Hamas? Did they even say the
word Hamas? No. They said Palestine. Okay. So
that is from a legal fact based perspective,
unless they're radically motivated, which a lot of
them are,
is not something you can make the case
about.
I mean, that's the same as saying you
support Germany, therefore, you're a Nazi. Even during
that time frame, would not be the same
thing. It is it's it's incredible that they
are always trying to do this.
But they didn't even try because I think
they know they wouldn't be able to because
there is no evidence because they didn't break
the law. Now, Mohammed Khalil was an important
shift in all of this.
And I remember, they had people that committed
violence at these protests, and they had they
could have gone after them, but but they
didn't. They wanted to go after somebody who
was publicly known, who was prominent, who was
well spoken, who articulated well about the genocide,
and this is what Israel wanted. They asked
for it over and over. The Betar US
group was a proud Zionist Israeli connected group
that's all over this country, has been giving
pagers to people, and then you then you
see Netanyahu give a pager to people as
a as a, what's his name?
The big lumbering, tall idiot guy in our
congress.
Basically, gave him a silver pager as a
positive thing. So you don't think there's a
connection there? The reality is clearly that these
people are promoting this, and they proudly said
we're making lists for the government to deport.
I've been talking about it for weeks.
And they said, Khalil, Khalil, Khalil, Khalil to
Bondi, to Grubio, to Trump. And then the
one person they go after first is Khalil.
And didn't commit a crime, nothing what they
said was true,
and nope. Nothing it doesn't even matter. He's
gone. It doesn't matter.
That's where we are. And if you think
for one second that's in the interest of
The United States or because that's what The
US wants or even what anybody but Israel
wants, you're not paying attention.
Why would you think this would be in
the interest of The United States or the
Trump administration?
Think about it for a second. Why would
it benefit them to get rid of a
person who had no criminal record, who was
not breaking the law, and in fact was
very clearly acting even if you disagree with
him within his constitutional rights.
Doesn't that seem like a dangerous and stupid
move for somebody pretending to fight for the
constitution?
Yes.
Even if you agree with it. So think
about that for a second and ask yourself,
as always, who benefits?
Now Cornell student,
protester, facing deportation, leaves The US on his
own terms.
Now this is this is interesting to me
because what we're seeing here are people that
are not breaking the law,
People who are being forced out of the
country who they're like, it says, a Cornell
student, this is from today, facing deportation after
his visa was simply revoked
because of his campus activism.
They're not even hiding this anymore, guys. These
are people who are here legally,
who have no criminal record, who are simply
going to a protest, and they say, you're
deported because we don't like what you're doing.
I can't believe you even have people pretending
to be, like, what Republican or conservative or
whatever, pretending to be believing in the constitution
or even fighting for liberty who can side
with this.
You are a hypocrite and a liar if
you, in any way, are acting like this
makes sense. At the very least, admit that
you don't believe that constitutional rights should apply
if they decide you're a terrorist.
Be honest about it.
Now
his name is,
Mamadou Tal, a citizen of of United Kingdom
and Gambia. He's asked a federal court to
halt his detention, but he posted recently, this
was yesterday,
that he didn't believe a legal ruling in
his favor would guarantee his safety
or ability to speak out.
Now think about how chilling that is.
The whole argument is about freedom and liberty
and free speech, and these are this is
a person who chose who hadn't even lost
yet, who chose to deport himself
because he didn't feel he'd be safe even
if he got the right ruling. Now, you
know, let's not pretend that that's about the
radical right attacking him. No. Where he the
government is what he's talking about. He is
in this country, does not feel safe from
persecution from the government. Doesn't that sound like
the what we talk about? We pretend that
all these evil, you know, Middle East countries
are you know?
They are doing everything that they've always pretend
pretended they were fighting. And in reality, they've
been cultivating these things all over the world.
Look back look at what has changed.
So he left. He goes, I've lost faith.
I have lost faith. I could walk the
streets without being abducted.
That's what I mean. He that's he's talking
about the government.
Weighing up these options, I took the decision
to leave on my own terms.
Because it says the government said it revoked
his student visa in March. Why? Because of
his involvement in what they call disruptive events
or protests.
Disruptive protests.
Did he break the law? No. Did he
commit violence? No.
So they just decide to make it about
what they make it about.
That should terrify everybody, guys, and this is
not one case. If it was a one
off, you could argue there was a mistake.
This is doubling, doubling, doubling down.
What we know about the case of detained
Georgetown professor Badar Khansouri. This one's interesting. A
federal judge has blocked immigration officials from deporting
a Georgetown University professor,
a postdoctoral
scholar who was detained by the Trump administration
earlier. This was earlier,
I think,
about March,
I think. The point
I've said this before.
Even though there's gonna be people who just
are motivated to support this because they they
are feel boxed in, don't know what else
to do. The point is we were being
told this was gonna be criminals and rapists
and and, right, the drain on society. Well,
other than the people they are eluding or
claiming are part of the gang, that nobody
seem to be proving. And now every day,
we find more of them that are not
or who are innocent, so it's concerning as
hell. It seems to be a bunch
of people that are
in,
Ivy League colleges, people going for doctorates, PhDs.
The one unifying point, they all call out
Israel.
So is that what you think of the
drain on this society? People that are trying
to better themselves through higher education, people that
are have families and have been here for
decades in some cases?
Obviously not. Unless your real point is you
just don't like people with certain skin colors
and certain ideologies, which is obviously a huge
part of this.
But the point is the judge had blocked
the officials from deporting him.
Now it says, Roslyn, Virginia is his home
where his wife and three young children are
still living.
His lawyers are still working to get him
released. So he's currently detained,
apparently, indefinitely with no charge because there's no
crime. Right? Welcome to the twenty twenty five
US government, guys. That's where we are. You
could be detained in def that's what he
was just talking about. That's why he wanted
to leave on his own, the other guy.
Because this is like Israel now. You just
get scooped up and you're held until they
decide. And by the way, as even Derek
has written about in the past, this is
not the first time.
Obama really kind of enshrined this, and the
NDAA and Trump and the rest of them
have all continued it. And that's for American
citizens, mind you, let alone somebody I mean,
it's it applies the same way. It's some
constitutional rights.
But he goes, Suri,
the professor,
Georgetown professor,
is just the latest scholar in Trump administration
has detained or tried to deport for their
support of Palestinian rights or for criticizing Israel
for the war in Gaza.
Tricia McLaughlin,
Assistant Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security,
said on Twitter,
Suri was a foreign exchange student at Georgetown
University actively, they claim, spreading Hamas propaganda
and promoting antisemitism on social media. And you
can look for yourself. What do they mean?
I think you already know.
End the Gaza war, you're committing genocide, and
Israel's responsible.
Those things become Hamas propaganda, antisemitism,
and we all know that. They're not even
trying to hide that.
And neither of those things apply
unless you wanna conflate Zionism and and and
Judaism or Israel itself with the religion. It's
not the reality, guys. There's people in Israel,
Orthodox Jewish groups in Israel right now screaming
with signs saying Jew Zionism does not represent
us.
And I don't care if you think it's
1%. It still matters. It is not the
full picture. And so you can't pretend that
by saying the things that Jewish people in
Israel are saying, that you're suddenly a terrorist
supporting Hamas. It's just insane.
Surya's close connections, they claim, to a known
or suspected terrorist. I'll show you this in
a second. Who is a senior adviser to
Hamas? That's their claim. Just like they're over
here claiming all these lies about people that
are not actually criminals, and it's gonna get
worse the more we go forward the next
few tabs here,
Becomes you're a terrorist because we say so.
And they're doubling down because they're committed, guys.
Now his lawyers deny this, but here's the
point.
Here he
is. Badar Khan Suri.
It says Suri's wife
is a US citizen of Palestinian descent,
and her father
is Ahmed Yousef,
a former adviser to Hamas, according to the
Associated Press. Yousef told the New York time
the New York Times that his son-in-law
wasn't involved in a political activism, including on
behalf of Hamas.
Yousef, for his part, has criticized
October 7, the attack on Israel, and left
his role in the Hamas run government more
than a decade ago. Okay. So unpacking it,
if you haven't followed already, we're talking about
his wife's,
his wife's father,
okay,
who a decade ago
was in a and and not in a
military sense, was working under Hamas like everybody
else was. Like, you have to understand how
dumb this is. And I've made this point
so many times. And by the way, let
me be clear. That does not then prove
that he wasn't doing something wrong. My point
though is you can't use just the virtue
of the situation to claim that he was
doing something wrong because you can prove,
Let's not forget, by the way, Israel funded
Hamas right up until October 7. It's easily
to prove.
But the point is that after the forced,
I think, manipulated
election process in 02/2006, because let's not pretend
like they would allow, in my opinion, a
group they were calling terrorists to be voted
in and allowed to retake power. It makes
no sense. The point
is that, ultimately,
everything in that area was then under the
auspices of Hamas. Probably why they did that.
You You go and get a library card,
it's gonna say Hamas on it, guys. So
going forward, everything everywhere has some remnants of
that, and they go, yeah. You're all Hamas.
Maybe.
But you can see how easy it is
to manipulate that. So even if you wanna
claim it with Hamas and even if you
wanna claim he's the front lines with a
gun, which is they're claiming was not the
case,
ten years ago. And in October 7, he
called it out. So imagine now finding this
connection and trying to claim he's gonna be
deported because he's supporting terrorism.
I mean, this is probably the best connection
I've seen in all this conversation, and that's
flimsy as at best.
And even if this guy was a terrorist,
how now yours now he's guilty by association?
This is why they're not presenting evidence because
this would not hold up in court.
Wait. Wait. What crime did he commit? You
can't just continue to say that this guy
he is connected through his wife did things
that he didn't even you can't even prove
that, but he just has he's connected to
Hamas. Well, by that very logic, nobody in
Israel's government should be allowed in this country.
They're all connected to Hamas. But you see,
it's not about that. It's about going after
people that support Palestine and call out Israel's
crimes.
Here
make sure I didn't just miss that. Yeah.
Okay. Same one. Here is
from Irish star. Trump sends innocent man to
El Salvador for having a autism awareness tattoo.
Now let's be clear about this. I'm gonna
go through the evidence, but there's many, and
it seems more by the moment, guys.
People being exposed,
revealed to be
legally in this country and having no criminal
record.
Not just one, but many of them.
I mean, look. I I I'd like I
would argue that one person
being scooped up and sent to a concentration
camp is enough because all of the rest
of them had their rights violated too. But
it just is over the top for an
American and well, but it really shouldn't matter
in any context because all of them had
their rights violated. But now that we're seeing
more and more and more,
did this con did this government really just
send average people to concentration camps in El
Salvador, which we'll get to in a second,
because they support Palestine?
That seems like what's happening here. But I'm
not gonna pretend I know for sure. All
I do know is that these people their
rights were violated, and this is a dangerous
chilling step in the direction of authoritarianism.
Now the Trump administration unlawfully deported, unlawfully,
a Venezuelan man due to an autism awareness
tattoo. This is not a joke. This has
been this has been verified and roundly discussed
to the point where the White House is
having to put basically, almost apologize. We'll get
to it in a second, but not really.
That's not how they roll any of the
US government. But basically trying to admit it
while walking it back and saying, well, but
they're all bad people even though they're not.
Officials baselessly claim it was a gang tattoo.
Now we're gonna come back to this one
again and show you some of these
clip
I'll open and close it. Okay. Right here.
It's it's actually really sad. The nautical star,
I think I know, like, three people that
I grew up with that have two of
those. And they claim that star alone is
enough. With a couple of other metrics we'll
come back to. But that's what they're talking
about. A star that's, like, on the top
of every tattoo shop.
And look at the rest of them, guys.
A gun, Michael Jordan.
That's where we are.
Coming back.
On March 15, Donald Trump authorized the illegal
expulsion of hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to El
Salvador and Honduras despite a court order telling
him to halt all operations
until the accused receive a trial. See, they're
over here screeching about something else.
People don't wanna hide all of this to
make it out to be politically motivated. And
even if they are, doesn't change the fact
that that is the most basic fundamental right
concept. He's saying, don't you have to prove
that they're criminals? Yes. They actually do. And
they know that. That's why they tried to
make to kind of organize this in a
way that gave him the best cover. They
know what they're doing.
The problem here is that they're trying to
make it out to be that he's going
after him because he's attacking them because he's
a lefty.
And a lot of very unintelligent people are
falling for it because they hate certain things.
They've been primed to react. You say democrat,
they jump a certain high. They, you know,
they what's the old saying? They, you know,
jump how high kind of a thing. Right?
Do you yell democrat? They're like, where? You
point me. Where am I going? Who am
I attacking?
All he's asking for is that they should
receive a trial.
Insisting every immigrant aboard the three aircrafts were
dangerous gangsters of, remember, Trendaragu organization,
Trump maintained his decision to disregard the order
from the federal judge.
The whole claim was these were all Trendaragu.
That that was the push.
We're gonna come to another overlap where they're
going, no. No. MS 13, though, even though
that's not true.
So it's just it they're grasping at straws
right now.
However, it says the sister of Mary Jose
Alvaro
Borg Borg Borges Borges,
a 24 year old of Venezuelan descent
deported to El Salvador this month
in something in the alongside
alarmingly dangerous people,
right, in a place that is rife with
corruption.
I mean, imagine being an average person who
just got caught up in the wrong situation,
and you have your head shaved, you're stripped
naked, and you're forced to go to a
concentration camp prison around people that are going
to steal, beat you up, and rape you.
And that guys, this is not a secret.
This is what is allowed to take place
in this place.
And now we're gonna show you in a
second people that they're going, well, we don't
even know how to get them back, so
too bad.
God, I don't even know how to express
how chilling this is. This it really is
pretty terrifying.
Now it says family members let me make
sure I didn't miss this.
Oh, yeah. So it says,
however, the sister of of the of, Borges
Borges. I forget what either way it's pronounced.
A 24 year old Venezuelan descent reported to
El Salvador said that relatives suspect that immigrate
ice used his tattoos.
One showing the name of his autistic younger
brother, another showing a rainbow colored ribbon of
the autism acceptance movement
to justify his illegal ousting from The United
States.
Do you think that they confused a rainbow
colored autism sign for something else, or are
they maybe just going after left leaning people
to support Palestine?
I mean, I don't know. It just seems
insane that that would even be a mistake
that we made. So it does not feel
like a mistake to me.
But it says family members confirmed he was
not a criminal. Now, of course, they could
be lying, but you realize that if they
wanted to prove these things, they could easily
present the evidence, and they're not. I don't
think it exists.
And to be clear,
most of these are being proven through their
lawyers to be no criminal record and here
legally.
So and and, again, the main point overarching
continuously,
they would get due process anyway.
So that alone, whether criminals or not, is
a major violation of the constitution. Now
Now it says none of these tattoos has
anything to do with the Tran de Aragua
gang.
But for them, immigration authorities, anyone with a
tattoo is connected to Tran de Aragua, and
that does appear to be one of these
major points. We'll get to that in a
second. Now it says he had been a
psychology student
who dropped out of school to come to
America
Nine Months ago. Why? Because of the upheaval
of the Venezuelan economy, which has been a
focal point of Rubio and Trump and the
rest to destroy their economy because they didn't
do what they were told.
Not a secret.
The set they were proudly doing everything they
could to destroy that economy. Just like with
Iran, it's what they do, which they know,
as a matter of fact, hurts mo more
than anybody this the lowest on the rung,
the average people in the streets.
So these people are struggling, even as he's
going to school, couldn't get a job, and
this is not this is an easily proven
reality.
So
they went to the country doing it,
trying to get asylum,
which happens often.
It says many of us many of us
have come here because of the situation back
in our country. There were times when we
didn't even have food to eat or have
enough money to buy anything.
So they came here for a better life.
Isn't that what we talk about? And then
now he's in El Salvador. Who knows what's
happening?
Here is the from today, the independent, Trump
admin accidentally sent Maryland father these are all
different stories, by the way. Maryland father to
a Salvadorian
mega prison and says it can't get him
back. Now I'm realizing now I probably should
have started with how horrifying this prison is,
but we'll get to that in a second
from Human Rights Watch and and others.
But this is the craziest one.
Says now it can't get him back?
In what world would that not be that
you're, like, top priority?
If you're I mean,
well, we'll read through it first.
It said and that's Noam right there doing
her little stunt where, apparently, she spent over
a hundred thousand dollars flying on her local
budget. Like, are if you voted for her
locally, does that matter to you to, what,
to fly there and stand in front of
a bunch of criminals and pretend like that's
who you sent there even though it's every
day being proven that's not the case? Well,
she did. They're all doing that. They're all
rapists and torturers and now apparently human traffickers.
And I I I'll show you why in
a second they're using that one more than
ever right now. Let's not forget.
They completely deviated from human trafficking, child sexual
abuse investigations
to go after antisemitism,
to go after protest people.
This is public, guys. I don't show you
yet again. That came from that's that's their
data.
Amazing from the from the the political side
that is talking more than anybody in the
world about, and in many cases rightly so,
about sex trafficking.
And then you you voted and promises kept
and all of a sudden, he removes that
focus and goes after antisemitism?
How in the world is anybody honest acting
like that's a promise kept or any of
them, in fact? But the Trump administration
accidentally sent a Salvadoran immigrant to a notorious
Salvadoran prison
and says it can't do anything to get
him back.
That's even though the man had protected immigration
status, like all the ones we're talking about
here, guys,
specifically. Now here this one's even crazier. So
he was here legally in the country
and not on on top of that, a
judge had already ruled that you could not
send him back to this country in particular
because this was in an ongoing back and
forth. We were trying to, and it was
ruled that he was allowed to stay. It
says specifically
borrowing him from being sent back to the
country for fear of prosecution
because this is an authoritarian country. That's why
they support these groups, Israel and The United
States, because they're all the same at this
point. It says on Monday, in a filing
in Maryland federal court,
ICE admitted
publicly
to mistakenly sending him, which I don't believe
is true, to El Salvador's notoriously brutal, they
call it Cicotte Prison.
On March 15, quote, although ICE was aware
of his protection from removal to El Salvador,
Garcia was removed to El Salvador because of
an administrative
error.
So this is just disgusting. So not only
are they going oopsie, but now are now
it's out of our hands.
They're they're outwardly in other context trying to
frame him as a criminal anyway, even though
that does not appear to be the case
by every piece of evidence we have. Down
here, it says the Trump administration argues that
because the man is no longer in US
custody,
a US court lacks jurisdiction. And sort of
like every other time they go, oops. We
didn't hear.
Right? Where they didn't listen to the ruling,
and then the bouquet lady sends a picture
and oopsie.
They're making fun of you, guys. They know
they're they're choosing to ignore this. Or the
other example,
where she ran into the ice and was
going, we have the court order right here
in a different not the same conversation,
and
they would not be seen. Nobody came to
the front desk. He was ringing the bell.
And then finally, oh, too late. We are
he just left. Sorry.
They know what they're doing. Now, why would
they do that? Is it about the quota
or something else? It seems pretty alarming how
clearly this is being used in a wildly
deceptive way.
So, again,
arguing, Well, he's gone now. We don't know.
It's not our fault.
What is it? Wait. Kindergarten?
You're goddamn you're damn right it's your fault.
You just sent an innocent man to a
concentration camp. How would that not be your
fault? Somebody who was here in this country
legally.
Now it says fleeing from gangs in his
home country who allegedly stalked, assaulted, and threatened
to kill and kidnap him as part of
extortion efforts.
That's that's where he came from, El Salvador.
That's where they sent him back. That's why
the court ruled not to. But it says
ICE accused him of being a member of
that's how they tried to make it make
sense. Accused him of being a member of
a Salvadorian criminal gang, MS thirteen, even though
everyone on these planes were under the umbrella
of Tran de Aragua. Right? Now they're just
I guess, the narrative changed. Citing information that
stemmed from a 02/2019
arrest with a group of men outside a
Maryland Home Depot.
The arrest
resulted in no charges.
Garcia's lawyers argue police deemed the man a
gang member on weak evidence, which seems to
be the running tally right now, including a
claim from a confidential informant
that he was that Garcia was a member
of MS thirteen
from the state he'd never lived in and
the fact that Garcia was wearing a Chicago
Bulls hat at the time of his arrest.
You see how flimsy this gets? So instead
of the tattoo,
they just go, oh, well, you know, same
thing. Right? He's wearing a drawer not even
Jordan, a Bulls hat. Because here's what's insane
about that. 23 is what's supposed to connect
to it.
But he wears a Bulls hat, and Jordan
was on the team at in the past.
So therefore, that's connection.
Do you think in any way this is
I mean, guys, how you even could pretend
that somebody honest is gonna make that flimsy
connection?
Are they just trying to scoop up people
that are brown in the right place at
the wrong time? I mean, guys, this I
I don't know how else you understand this.
And I'm not talking about everybody. I'm talking
about probably some of these people who are,
like the judges, politically motivated.
You know that exist in every field because
that's what they're doing from both sides of
the broken paradigm.
But it says his attorneys maintain he has
no criminal record, which you can prove. Tie
no ties to the gang or relation to
any criminal group. And if they disagree, well,
then you can easily present that evidence, which
is what they keep saying from their from
their podiums.
And so we got plenty of evidence.
Well, that's the same old tired mantra that
they continue to give you about chemical attacks,
about WMDs,
about everything that later gets proven to be
false or everything you're doing in Israel.
During the removal proceedings, Garcia applied for asylum,
and this is the last time, and protection
under the United Nations Convention against Torture oh,
no. Excuse me. This is I'm thinking of
the other one. So the the point regardless,
the point is the past one was the
guy who was here already in the sick
he'd given asylum.
In this process,
even the judge ruled that he wasn't allowed
to go. This is not the plane turning
back situation. And a judge granted him withholding
from removal. The government did not appeal the
decision.
Okay. So
legal standing. They didn't push back. He's here
legally now in the context of not being
removed through there. He's saying the Maryland man,
a union sheet metal working apprentice and father
to five year old, remained on a US
remained in The US
and continued
regular mandated check ins with ICE according to
court documents.
Quote, instead,
the government put mister Garcia on a plane
to El Salvador
seemingly without any pretense of a legal basis
whatsoever.
Once in El Salvador,
that country's government immediately placed him into a
torture center.
One that the US government is reportedly
paying the government of El Salvador
to operate.
This grotesque display of power without law is
abhorrent to our entire system of justice and
must not be allowed to stand.
Okay. So if you understand that there was
this manufactured case against him when he doesn't
have a criminal record and is here legally
becomes the argument for why they remove him
even if they already even though the judge
already ruled that you can't send him there,
they just scoop him up and send him
anyway.
And two and, I mean, look. If you
think he's breaking the law, then just use
the law to remove
him. But to send somebody who is not
a criminal, who's even here legally to
a to a prison like this in another
country is absolutely insane.
But on top of that, then make sending
putting him in a torture center that they're
funding.
This is not new. And let's not forget,
this goes across multiple administration. This is Trump
and Biden high fiving about the manipulation of
your rights.
The same thing we're doing everywhere. Same thing
as the torture prisons they operate in Yemen
with The UAE that both Biden and Trump
utilized. It's not new, guys.
Trump even brought on what's her name.
I'm blanking her name off top of my
head. But the woman that was, you know,
oh, I almost had it.
The woman, you know, she was basically the
the central character in, like, a torture conversation,
and then they brought her on anyway. She
said, well, I'm not gonna do it this
time. Sure.
This is just just horrifying. Now it says
the individual in question is a member of
the brutal m f thirteen gang, they're saying.
It's their quote. We have intelligence reports that
he is involved in human trafficking. I'll play
that for you in a second.
That that's coming directly from the DHS.
It says whether he is in El Salvador
or a detention facility in The US, he
should be locked up. Well, you know what?
Even if you even if that's the truth,
those are not the same thing. There's no
equivalency there. You're talking about somebody who was
here, so under our legal system,
and has to be proven to be what
you're claiming. You can't just go, we've decided
he's a criminal. So wherever he is, it's
it's okay.
If that's the case, then prove the crime.
And it says the and this is the
the whole, he should be locked up anyway,
is the emotional argument you're getting from the
lead the the rulership,
and you get then regurgitated from the people
that are mindlessly following along.
This is remarkable that the Atlantic and other
MSM
continue to do the bidding of these vicious
gangs and ignore their victims.
Excuse me. It says on Wednesday, March 12,
Garcia learned his immigration status had changed, and
he was sent to El Salvador by Saturday.
CCOT is the same facility
dubbed, quote, a tropical gulag
by some human rights groups where the Trump
administration sent hundreds of Venezuelans it alleges to
be members of Tran de Aragua or MS
thirteen if that falls apart, using emergency powers
under the wartime alien enemies act to remove
men without full court proceedings. Even then, that
does not in my opinion, from a from
a constitutional standpoint, that does not apply.
You can I mean, this is they're creating
groundwork to just simply argue that if they
decide,
then your rights don't matter? You realize by
principle, this applies to whoever they're pointing to.
US, Americans,
anybody, guys. It's the same principle seeing as
how you have rights either
way. I this should terrify everybody who knows
who have been say if you thought if
you were scared of Obama or Clinton doing
this,
how do you not see this is the
same damn thing just because you support the
guy? It's the same thing.
Multiple individuals who were among the hundreds removed
from the country this month as part of
the operation appear to have been deported for
having tattoos with relatively common motifs, including an
Air Jordan logo, a crown, a star, a
rainbow autism awareness symbol.
Says secretary of state Rubio on Thursday
conceded
that the Venezuelans were not all necessarily members
of Tran de Aragua, which is exactly the
opposite of what they said first.
Now it says he called the group a
combination of people
whose presence, quote, is not productive to The
United States and who were removable by law.
Oh, wow. So now you're not productive in
this country? You can just kick them out?
I mean,
nobody with a brain who understands even a
fraction of the constitutional reality is agreeing with
this. It's people who are politically motivated, you
know, exactly like they're using to go after
these judges.
He's wrong, by the way. And you know
what? He knows he's wrong.
Even if you are a criminal,
you have due process.
So you can't just, you know, removable by
law is not even the point is, sure,
if you prove their crime, and being not
productive is not a crime.
So all he's trying to do is pave
over the fact that they just sent innocent
people to a terrifying prison, and they don't
even seem to care.
That's disgusting, guys. These are really bad people.
Now
Aaron
says it's it's JD Vance who did oh,
starting here.
JD Vance says this thirty first.
John, Favreau says, any comment on this, Rubio,
Vance, Elon Musk?
You just admitted to accidentally sending an innocent
father from Maryland to torture dungeons in El
Salvador, and you refused to do anything about
it. The Atlantic covered this.
Here's what he says. Vance,
my comment is that according to the court
document you apparently didn't read, he is a
convicted MS
thirteen gang member with no legal right to
be here.
My further comment is that it's gross that
it's gross to get fired up about gang
members getting deported while ignoring citizens that they
victimized.
Well, see, this is their their their manipulating
the low intelligence
reader.
People that are already in line with what
they think and say. So the point is,
how in the world are you gonna just
may argue that they're who's even talking about
the victims here? No one is saying that
what happened is if if anything, because we're
it's generalized.
The point is if there's people that are
in criminal here, I'm sure that in some
cases, they're victims. No one's denying that. In
this context, by saying that you did not
do the legal reality does not mean you're
ignoring the what if and when that had
victims. He's trying to outrage you emotionally to
ignore the facts. And even worse,
he's wrong.
He didn't read it apparently, or he's doing
this to try to manipulate people that he
knows won't read it and will instead, in
lieu of that, point to what he said
as the facts. And that is what's happening.
People just look at the quote tweets, guys.
14,000,000 views. Look at the quote tweets. People
that are super influential with hundreds of thousands
of followers are going, they didn't even rate
he they are gang members. They proved it.
Well, how about we actually look at the
the documents?
As he Jay z as Melnick says, JD
Vance, who didn't read the filings, mister and
by again, we already went over this. From
the independent, those court documents are included, has
no criminal record. In 02/2019,
he was arrested but not charged. Now that's
that's the actual reality of that. You could
argue he was still a criminal and they
just didn't charge him. But if you're not
charged, you have no criminal record.
He was not charged, and it was for
loitering outside of Home Depot.
Despite him denying gang ties, the cops put
down on a form that he was MS
13.
That's it.
So they simply are now pointing back to
no charge, but they wrote that down. And
that's what Vance is pointing to. So either
he's that stupid or he's trying to deceive
you.
That's I find this alarming in every possible
way.
He says it's shocking that vice president of
The United States would know so so callously
and so falsely accuse someone of being a
convicted gang member. I mean, these guys, they
know they're locked in. What else they're gonna
do? Admit that they just sent some guy
to a concentration camp illegally? I mean, they
could they could be charged with a crime
for that. They could be impeached at the
very least. It says it's especially bad when
his own administration just admitted to illegally deporting
the person due to administrative error. Right? They
just said that, and his response is he's
a terrorist or a criminal? Well, if he
was a criminal, then it wouldn't be an
error.
But still understand, regardless,
there would still be the presentation of evidence
that they're not doing across the board.
It says, who's omitting relevant facts? I've repeatedly
noted that claims oh, and this is responding.
I thought, oh, this is the wrong one.
Hold on. I'll come and go into his
thread in a second.
So here he's following up on this where
this is another person calling him out saying
Vance here mocking Jon Favreau for not reading
the court filing, says the deported man was
a convicted gang member. The court filing, which
is right here, does not say that. It
says he was denied bond in 02/2019 over
informant's claim that he was MS 13. It's
right on the document. You can read it
for yourself. Here's the actual court document.
You know, again, what you'll not get in
mode in all of the mainstream alternative media
trying to convince you the opposite is true.
Clear.
Now, here is what Levitt said that Bennet
Johnson is proudly supporting because he supports whatever
they point to. The point here, guys, is
that she's putting down the lie. Now, let's
to be clear, Levitt is just a talking
head. She's repeating what she was told. That's
their job.
But know
that the Trump fans, whatever's pushing this on
her, their administration
is knowingly deceiving you with this conversation.
Error that you are referring to was a
clerical error. It was an imminent So just
to be clear, that's what we were just
talking about. The error, the clerical error that
they claimed was an error around the guy
who was not MS thirteen. Straight of error.
The administration maintains the position that this individual
who was deported to El Salvador and will
not be returning to our country was a
member of the brutal and vicious
MS thirteen gang. So then why would you
talk about not getting him back? Like, oh,
it's too late. No. I don't even know
if we can get him back. Why would
you even say that if you were convinced
he was a criminal? You see, because that
was the quick response they gave because they
were on the spot. Now they've manufactured their
narrative, guys.
This is how they work.
Even Rogan and them are openly discussing how
though they just won't admit it because that's
what governments do. Yes. Yes. All sides of
it. Think about how how disgusting it is,
how alarming it is that their the government
is professing to be the one saving the
world are literally doubling down on what they
know was a crime.
This is this is as bad as any
other country they claim to be going after,
if not worse. That is fact number one.
Fact number two, we also have credible intelligence
proving that this individual was involved in human
trafficking.
In fact number three, this individual was a
member, actually a leader of the brutal MS
thirteen gang, which this president has designated as
a foreign terrorist organization.
Fact number four is that foreign terrorists do
not have legal protections in The United States
Of America anymore, And it is within the
president's executive authority and power to deport these
heinous individuals from American communities. It is a
promise he campaigned on. It is a promise
he is keeping. And every single person in
this room, should be grateful for that considering
especially MS thirteen
is very prevalent and prominent here in the
District Of Columbia, in Merril
Right. So it becomes the broad point. They're
everywhere and it's bad. So why are you
why are you mad about this? Well, because
you just conflated the fact that they're not
part of it. But, again, there's main points
here.
Fact number four is that foreign terrorists do
not have legal protections in The United States
Of America anymore.
How? Anymore?
That's an interesting admission right there. Well, again,
if you understand the inherent
rights of the constitution,
anybody charged the crime has to process. That's
the reality. They've just changed that under, well,
national security.
Okay. So here's the reality. If they decide
to call you a terrorist or label whatever
group you're a part of as terrorist,
then you can be removed. You could be
arrested. You could be put in a dark
cell for the rest of your life and
never be thought of again. Doesn't it's irrelevant
whether you're an American or not for that
you must understand that.
You need to be scared of what they're
doing here because they're creating the groundwork,
which is unconstitutional,
but they're creating a legal groundwork for why
they can just redeem with you what they
want and get rid of you. If you
don't understand that the principle applies whether or
not you're American, you don't understand what's happening
right here, guys. And just if you just
convince yourself that they wouldn't do that, well,
you are fully lost because it's whether or
not even I completely disagree with you as
we already saw him floated, but what happens
when Democrats come into power in case that's
what makes sense to you?
How can you not think about that?
Unless you're convincing yourself that somehow they'll never
be in power again because that's what they're
I mean,
it's very clear how how bad this is.
And it is within the president's executive authority
and power to deport these heinous individuals from
American communities. It is a promise he campaigned.
Right. So now we're just they're all heinous
now. Even though everyone we're pointing to, you
have not yet proven a single one of
them were actually criminals
other than somebody who was here illegally, which
does not then make them a criminal under
the other than the idea that they are
breaking the law by being here illegally. But
realize within that category, we've already shown you
at least three of them who were in
the process of seeking asylum, which means they
did not crawl under offense. They walked up
to and they said, I'm I'm here to
seek asylum as they're in that process. And,
yes, in that limbo, they're technically not citizens
yet,
or rather even here but you same point.
It's all redundant, guys. There was one other
thing in the beginning here, I think. Number
two, we also have credible intelligence proving that
this individual was involved in human trafficking.
In fact, number three, this individual was a
member, actually a leader. Now he's a leader
of the gang. So it goes from being
arrested or rather picked up.
It's like the same thing, arrested but not
charged or or or brought to jail for
be for loitering at a Home Depot.
That's it. No charge. It's over. And they
write down MS thirteen, never been arrested again,
and she has the nerve to say he's
a leader.
Now look, guys. It's certainly possible. Anything's possible.
You know how we'd find out? Yep. Here
we are again by literally due due process
and proving your claims.
Now imagine how silly it would be right
now for somebody out there pushing back on
the idea of proving an allegation in this
country in 2025.
That's what they're doing. All the Benny Dunsons
and Jones and all the rest out there
clapping like a barking seal about how great
it is that we're destroying this country.
In Maryland and in Virginia and the president,
the attorney general, everyone who's been involved in
these operations is focused on eradicating these criminals
and terrorists from our communities. The vice president
said he was a convicted member of MS
thirteen. What evidence is there,
to back that up? There's a lot of
evidence in the Department of Homeland Security, and
ICE have that evidence. Okay. Hold her to
account, guys. Now, again, she's just a repeater,
but you probably know she's lying or, man,
who knows? But the point is Vance and
Trump and the they know. There there is
nothing. They're right now hurriedly trying to manufacture
something.
There is not what we have been presented
at the very least does not show any
of that. Now, if they have that, they
could present it and change your mind, couldn't
they? I'm willing to bet you that does
not happen.
Because as long as the guy's gone, all
they need is time, guys.
Here's a cat toy. Look over there. Oh,
another war. Oh, a shooting over there. People
will quickly forget.
Hopefully not. I won't. I'm gonna follow-up on
this.
This is where we are.
Of course, he says Penny Johnson says, Caroline
Levitt shuts down fake news Atlantic story. You
mean the facts that you were reported in
the fake news story? Yeah. You mean the
corporate media who lies all the time, who
put this out, which was true,
shuts down the story?
Do you think I mean, ask yourself this,
guys. Do you think Bennie Johnson is not
smart enough to be able to piece this
together, to look through the documents and realize,
oh, wait. He lied about that. Oh, wait.
The evidence isn't there. Or do you think
he's so dishonest it doesn't matter?
I don't see another option.
These people are going, yeah.
Get him.
Deported the Maryland father in quotes. Yeah. Because
he's a father, and he's not a criminal.
I mean, guys, these people are disgusting. Like,
it's inherently gross to me that these people
know what they're doing and are cheering on
or caring not to not caring to look
about people's lives
because they told you so.
You're a
coward and a follower. As Derek Pro says,
you're a mouthpiece for the establishment. The Trump
admin prove provided no evidence for these claims
in the courtroom or ever.
So here, I think, is where it's relevant
to listen to what Melnick said in front
of congress.
It's a five minute clip, but listen to
this, guys. He's breaking down the evidence which
he sources. You can look through I'm gonna
give you a lot of them coming up
next, but look through his Twitter thread or
his website. It's all documented information. And the
reality, which I think is really important to
this, is what we've been telling you.
So I here's Bennett Johnson's screen and go
why this is so important and do the
right thing or whatever he's saying, even though
thirty seconds ago, they were all screaming about
going after human trafficking. Right? Well, he's gonna
make a huge case here while they basically
depleted those investigations to go after people who
are protesting legally in this country or antisemitism.
I mean, look. If they literally came out
and said we're doing this because Israel said,
the Bennett Johnson of the world would clap
like a seal. I promise you that. These
people are followers. And I wanna end with
the point about somebody like a Dave Smith,
for example,
who in the Iran conversation
is at least showing you his line, saying,
look. If he does something with Iran, I
will never I will, for the rest of
my life, apologize for voting for him. Like,
good. At least people are showing that there
is a principle that will go too far.
Most of people in partisan left and right
seem to have no line. They will choose
to double down because that's their side.
That is embarrassing to me. You're not you're
not an adult in the room if you're
acting like that. I think that's a huge
part of the conversation, but I'm glad to
see people like that who in in past
conversations, I do think they do what they
think is right even if we disagree,
who are now showing you that there's this
is going too far. Whether it's support for
Israel, whether it's a continuing to bomb or
continue the wars in Ukraine, Israel, and God
everywhere,
it's clear that he is not following through,
guys.
This is just one part of that. Please
pay attention to this. It's important. Chairman, guest,
ranking member Correa, and distinguished members of the
subcommittee. My name is Aaron Franklin Melnick, and
I'm senior fellow at the American Immigration Council,
a nonpart is a nonprofit organization which envisions
a nation where immigrants are embraced, American communities
are enriched, and justice prevails for all.
There is no doubt that president Biden's border
record at the border was mixed. As we
have argued, Biden made measurable progress at restoring
the asylum system while failing to lean on
a national level to respond to the unprecedented
rise in migration.
I'm actually glad he said that. Right? Because
people are so quick to respond and reflexively
push back on a for a partisan level.
And really what it's highlighting is, yes, like,
Biden play a role in this. Right? From
the same, like, the same problem in the
other in the other extreme.
Allowing unfettered immigration to cause problems. I mean,
again, my point, that's part one part of
a problem reaction solution that they're now using
the other side of it to effectively create
what they already had planned to create. I
think that's clear, but I think it's important
to hear that. True. The administration eventually settled
on a strategy in 2024
that produced results, including a drop in border
apprehensions of 80%.
But the legality and long term viability of
this strategy was questionable, and it was ultimately
too little too late.
However, Joe Biden is no longer president. And
while president Biden ordered DHS to focus on
immigrants who are recent entrance or public safety
threats, president Trump is focused on arresting and
deporting all removable immigrants, including long time residents,
those with no criminal records, families, children, and
undocumented workers.
Trump has made immigration enforcement the top priority
of federal law enforcement, above fentanyl trafficking, above
terrorism, and even above protecting our children from
predators.
But as long as they called them all
terrorists, then you can combine the two categories.
Right?
This obsession with draconian immigration enforcement will make
us all less safe.
If continued over the next four years, it
may also impoverish us as a climate of
fear and large scale removals cause the economy
to shrink and Americans to lose their jobs.
Over the last two months, the Trump administration
has reassigned thousands
of federal law enforcement officers away from their
normal duties to instead carry out low level
civil immigration enforcement arrests and prosecutions,
including against many people with no criminal record.
This has diverted resources away from serious public
safety threats.
According to Reuters at Homeland Security Investigations, which
over the last two years reported saving 3,000
children
from predators,
scores of agents who specialize in child sex
sex sexual exploitation
have been reassigned to immigration enforcement.
Mhmm. Rather than protecting kids, these special agents
are staking out immigrant workers homes and taking
down license plates.
At the Department of Justice,
attorney general Bondi declared on her first day
that immigration enforcement is the top priority of
the agency above nearly everything else. Even the
FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force has been directed
to assist in the execution
of president Trump's immigration initiatives.
But it doesn't stop there.
25%
of the DEA's workforce has been reassigned to
immigration enforcement.
Rather than tracking down drug traffickers, DEA agents
are combing through old files to find cases
where prosecutors can add illegal entry or reentry
charges years later.
Guys, how do you not see this? I
mean, look. Again, same point from before. How
is this in America's interest? Like, if you
think it's about getting rid of bad people
or like, if you just think it's about
getting rid of immigrants in general, they're why
are we bringing in Afrikaners from from South
Africa? Why are it's it's not the same
conversation. At the end of the day,
this is not what you guys were asking
for.
They're going after people that are adding to
the society. Whether you I mean look. If
you just want immigrants gone, then then be
honest about that and don't make it about
criminals because most of these people, if not
all that I've seen, are not criminals.
So they basically did a little bait and
switch on you guys where it's like, we're
going after the rapists and terrorists and and
drug traffickers, and then in fact, they stop
going after drug traffickers and go after random
people who are, you know, getting their doctoral
at at Brown. Right? It's that's what's happening.
It's just it's at least in many cases,
I think this is my point was, how
is this in the interest of The United
States,
especially since what you're doing is literally ignoring
constitutional rights? It does, however, seem to be
in the interest of one in particular entity
who in fact has been asking for these
things to happen, who has been pointing to
certain people to go after, and it was
actively trying to shut down what they all
are talking about. But let's but totally isn't
connected to that entity. Right? Because that would
be racist.
At the ATF,
a full 80%
of agents have been reassigned to immigration.
Even the IRS isn't immune with special agents
trained in financial crimes being made to go
after random immigrants instead.
In a world of limited resources,
diverting federal law enforcement to the mass deportation
agenda will have an obvious effect.
When HSI agents tracking online pedophiles are forced
to stake out undocumented workers, our children are
not safer.
When DEA agents investigating drug rings are told
to find immigrant families who missed court dates,
our communities are not safer. And when FBI
agents tracking terrorists are told to focus on
immigration arrests instead, our nation is not safer.
These concerns are not hypothetical.
In 2018, under the zero tolerance policy, border
prosecutors were ordered to charge all migrants with
illegal entry.
The result was clear. There was a large
drop in drug trafficking cases bought brought by
federal prosecutors,
because prosecutors were spending night and day focused
on migrant parents instead of going after the
drug traffickers.
This administration's priorities are backwards.
While Trump is spending billions of dollars on
detaining ever greater numbers of immigrants, his administration
is slashing services for Americans.
Money is pouring into the pockets of private
prison companies at the same time as USDA
is ending contracts, giving children access to fresh
local food, and Social Security is closing offices
nationwide.
Rather than a single-minded
focus on mass deportation, this administration and Congress
should pursue common sense policies that help American
communities.
We need a system that can resolve cases
quickly while also maintaining fairness, due process, and
meaningful accountability for all actors.
That includes a path to permanent legal status
for undocumented immigrants who have resided in this
country for decades without breaking other laws.
This would build American prosperity,
encourage the rule of law, and break the
power of unscrupulous
employers who exploit workers.
In an option between self defeating mass deportations
and a prosperity building path to legal status,
the choice is clear. Thank you, and I
look forward to your questions.
Now the the very last part, right, about
people who are illegally here but have broken
other laws. Like, that that's a fair like,
there's plenty of people that air on the
side, which I would argue is probably the
best way to go. That if you're breaking
the law, then that's a it's a crime.
Then charge people for the crime. Right? I
mean, that that is reality. Even though it
might under hurt certain people that aren't actually
criminals, the point is you have to air
like, we keep talking about air on the
side of principle. The you know, so if
that's the case and they're here illegally, then
that's a crime. So be it. If you
want that change, then we can or we
can discuss that. The point, though, is that
outside of that one discussion about some people
being caught up in that, the reality is
even those people, as we keep repeating, and
I will forever until this conversation is understood,
have the right to due process if you're
gonna remove them anyway. That is what we
understand every supreme court ruling. Every I mean,
it's consistent, guys.
The only pushback is that we should have
today, have exceptions because we well, then let's
have that conversation. In the meantime, stop illegally
sending people to concentration camps because they speak
out about Israel. But here's another example.
What to know about Andre, thirty one year
old makeup artist falsely deported to El Salvador
prison. This is for March 24.
It says, ICE wrongly detained Andre last year
when he sought asylum over persecution
for being gay and his opposition to president
Maduro because immigration officials thought his tattoos
linked him to Trey
Trey Nicaragua.
See. So this is not even new, guys.
Before this, last year, he was already inappropriately
connected to him because he had a tattoo
according to tweets and media appearances by his
lawyer. Andre is among multiple migrants deported recently
to El Salvador whose attorneys and family members
have said have no gang affiliation or even
a criminal record
and took the appropriate legal steps to seek
asylum. So that's the important part. They're in
the process of getting asylum or in many
cases already given asylum. And, nonetheless, that's ignored.
So that's your government violating our own laws
and constitutional rights in order to get rid
of somebody because they don't support what they
want them to support, or they are speaking
out about things they don't want you speaking
out about. The Trump administration claims it had
the authority to deport the migrants it suspected
of gang affiliation without court hearings
under, of course, the Alien Enemies Act.
That's why it was used. They think it
gives them some some legal groundwork to say
we don't need to prove anything.
It's simply not true. The reality is you
this is a slippery slope of declaring national
security for whatever you want to get by
with whatever you want. That's slippery slope of
declaring national security for whatever you want to
get by with whatever you want. That's what
they seem to be doing everywhere.
Every single thing they're doing, they're trying to
find some way to just bypass what we
the the check and balance of our system.
And you may think that's the way to
go. Maybe it's the only way. The bottom
it what the bottom line is even what
they're doing is clearly showing you they don't
actually care about what they're claiming they're fighting
for.
What all this is doing is cementing the
reality that they can do whatever they want
if they just say the words, national security.
But it says a decision in regard to
using that without court hearings that was blocked
by judge Boseberg,
who said it's not a valid claim. Now
you see why they're going after him so
aggressively? Not because he's I mean, look. Let's
just say for sake of conversation, he is
completely politically motivated.
It's irrelevant because that's very clearly proven to
be a reality, guys. That does not suddenly
remove your constitutional rights. That do we do
we all forget what the word inherit means?
Inalienable?
You can ask the right in every other
conversation, and they'll triple down. Shall not be
infringed unless Israel's involved.
Now it says, Rosenberg ruled Monday that the
migrants were, quote, entitled to individualized hearings to
determine whether the act applied at all. You
see, even under these acts, the point is,
okay. If that's the case, then you have
to show us the evidence that makes that
apply.
They know what they're doing.
Now, here is the guy we're talking about.
Imagine
sending this guy, a gay barber, to El
Salvadorian prison for being a member of a
gang.
Like,
the guys, you know, let's not pretend like
they're making mistakes here. I don't know how
we can frame this any other way. He
says an a c u l ACLU
filing sheds light on how Andre, the gay
makeup artist, sent to rot in prison in
El Salvador, ended up being labeled trend trende
aragua.
Documents filed by ICE show that only the
only evidence this is their documentation.
ICE listed for membership was a tattoo of
a crown with mom below it.
So here is the this is from
the thirtieth.
Another documents
a document filed by ACLU is the unclassified
ICE document showing what it alleges are trendy,
aragu tattoos.
Now, even if they were, understand, anybody could
see these thumbnails and get them. But it
doesn't prove because you have a tattoo that
you're part of it. It's certainly an indication
if you're investigating, but you see, that's not
a crime to have a tattoo, guys. We're
allowing them to go down this path because
people support partisans.
Now it says, but reverse image search simply
shows that these were stolen from the Internet
and have nothing to do with Brenda Iragua.
But it's and this continues. He says, new
oh, make sure I wasn't blue. Oh, there
was. Okay.
Oh, and this is just about the individual
ones. The jump man,
imagine, which or I think of an image,
which was the New York Post claim refers
to 23, a specific point. That's my point
from before. The 23 is what matters, a
specific Venezuelan neighborhood. It's Michael Jordan's number, which
is the point, was first posted on Twitter.
But let's remember, guys, they just used the
fact that the guy was wearing a bull's
hat, not even a
Jordan, a bull's hat. Because, well, Jordan's on
the bulls and, like, they're searching. There's they're
reaching.
Why would you do that?
I mean, that he just goes over each
one of them. And the reality is regardless,
especially the nautical star tattoo. Are you kidding
me?
Same point applies. All of them.
But this one goes back thirtieth again and
says, ACLU obtained ICE's alien enemies act validation
guide. This is the important part. Confirming all
it takes to be sent to rot in
El Salvadorian prison is, one, having a tattoo
an ICE officer says
is gang related.
Number two,
displaying, quote, logos or symbols or clo on
clothes an ICE officer says are gang signs.
That's it. So this is what the guy
was talking about. Oh, I haven't played it.
It's right here. Let's play this first.
Glenn Glenn says,
this is the same BS that drove the
Bush, Cheney, Obama war on terror. Right. The
left right overlap, just like today. He says,
why are you imprisoning and kidnapping people with
no due process? Government, stop defending terrorists.
They go, but how do you know they're
terrorists? Absent hearing. Because we said they are.
That's what happens. We watched this this morning.
This should the now the volume's a little
low on the side of the question answering
question asking. That's what they're asking.
Our answer is very clear.
Guide the DHS is using to determine
who is, an enemy alien, a trendy Iraq
member,
and the Affordable Under the Enemy Aliens Act.
It has criteria that require
eight points,
to be classified
as as a TDA member.
You can get classified by simply having
certain symbols in your tattoos
and wearing certain streetwear brands. That alone
is enough
to get someone classified as TDA and sent
to El Salvador.
That's not true.
It is true. Now the insane part is
I mean, she this she just has talking
points that she's she's
primed to say. Okay? She's not act I
mean, whether she's informed on it or not,
her job is not to actually be informed.
Her job is to repeat what she's told.
That's a White House press secretary. The point
is that you have the documents. Why? Because
it's been released.
The ICE put the there it's public information.
You can read their documents that make it
very clear. The point is two of those
eight points are enough to get you deported.
It's it's undeniable.
And so all she does is go no
because people will listen to what she says
and report that as the fact
today, even in corporate media. It's insane.
Even though you can look at the documents
for yourself. Thanks, Twitter files, for undermining the
idea of source material. I keep telling you
that was relevant. Here's what she says in
response.
Jamelle Salvador.
That's not true, actually, Andrew. According to this
document, it is. No. A document released by
ICE. According to Department of Homeland Security and
the agents have you talked to the agents
who have been putting their lives on the
line?
Okay. Right. Because you're now see, that was
a a little dig. So how dare you?
They put their lives in the line. To
to what? Arrest people at a Harvard Harvard
or or or
I mean, the reality is clearly in some
cases, yes. Again, assuming any of them were
actually gang members because let's realize none of
them have been proven to be. I'm not
disputing it, but there's no evidence, so we
don't know. That's an honest stance.
The point is putting your lives in the
line. Everyone we've seen so far has been
a gay barber,
a doctoral student at Brown, a p h
PhD student at Harvard. Yeah. Those are you're
you're in danger. Right? Or what's, what's her
name? Osterk. Do you see in the video
this meek little woman being arrested and you
just kind of they surround her and they
kinda gently put handcuffs on her, like, seven
of them, cover their faces?
But see, they she want they they want
you to respond emotionally and be like, yeah.
They're threatened. They're putting their lives on the
line for you. How dare you without thinking
about the facts. Emotion will circumvent logic. That's
why they do that.
Who have been putting their lives on the
line, to detain these foreign terrorists who have
They're all foreign terrorists now. See how broad
stroke that is? Foreign terrorists?
Not a single one of these people have
been proven to commit any crime relating to
terrorism. Not a single one of them. None
of them.
At best, you have an affiliation
to a gang you're claiming that no one
has proven.
Just because you label that terrorism does not
mean that they have now committed terrorism. You
realize how insane that is? Like, even if
they're actually part of a gang you've labeled
terrorists, Show me where they've committed terrorism. So
now we're just jumping over everything to say
they're they're acting in terrorist acts?
These are desperate people, guys. I don't know
how else to see this.
I mean, I mean, I guess, I I
see it as desperate because this is wildly
obvious. Maybe it's just that they don't care.
I mean, I we talked about this morning
a little bit. I get the impression these
people are all concerned
about the increasing awareness of the average people.
Even if you disagree with me, the point
is that it's blind. What they're doing is
is is showing you
that they're just gonna you their the facts
don't apply. Simple way to put it. It's
whatever narrative they yell the loudest.
We've been terrorizing our communities.
TDA is a vicious gang that has taken
the lives of American women. And our age
So point is if you can't hear him,
she go, they're a dangerous gang over everybody.
He goes, I'm not denying that. And she
just keeps going keeps going. Why? Because if
you just yell all the bad things this
gang has done and the background assumption is
that they're all part of that gang, well,
then you're denying you're you're trying to cover
for these rapists and murderers, even though none
of them were actually proven to have done
any of those things or even part of
the gang. But that's how this works. That's
what that's what Glenn was saying. Because they're
terrorists because we said so. How dare you?
It's it's embarrassing in a way that they
don't even falls for this. Agents on the
front lines take our communities.
TDA is a vicious gang that has taken
the lives of American women. And our agents
on the front lines take,
deporting these people with the utmost seriousness, and
there is a litany of criteria that they
use to Yeah. Eight points, two of which
will be deported. Very easy to prove. Sure
that these individuals qualify as foreign terrorists documents
And and to ensure Do you realize how
crazy that is? Even what he's saying, they
don't prove you're a foreign terrorist. Like, the
point is the document shows you two points
of of eight potential that would be used
to deem you might be connected to a
gang that they've labeled a terrorist.
I mean, again, I wanna reiterate that if
you can't see how flimsy this
is and how clearly the principle applies to
whoever they wanna aim it at, I don't
know why we wouldn't see Americans coming next.
I'm not trying to scare anybody. They've already
floated that idea, which I'll play in a
minute. It just seems obvious to me. Why
wouldn't it? This is the clear the direction
it's all going in, and the principle applies.
It is the same violation as if it
were Americans right now.
Or to ensure that they qualify for deportation.
And the president made it incredibly clear to
the American public that there would be a
mass deportation campaign. Yeah. Well, the point again
is always is if you wanna deport them,
you'd have to provide the evidence to justify
that claim. As many judges have now ruled,
they're just trying to bull rush right over
it. Of not just foreign terrorists, but also
illegal criminal aliens who have been wreaking havoc
on American communities. And shame on you and
shame on the mainstream media Wow. Trying to
cover for these individuals. Shame went there. Right?
Shame on so the question was, the ICE
document they released shows that only takes two
points. Your comment.
Shame on you for defending these evil villain
terrorist rapist murderers.
I mean, she that's a cartoon, guys. Like,
it's so this is why if you've pulled
away from this long enough, this is just
you you almost have to laugh if it
wasn't so terrifying.
That is
stupid.
It's ignorant. It is lazy.
Just basic ideas, guys. What they're doing is,
you know, flailing over into a conversation that's
not even related to basic question. And what
does that show you? They don't have an
answer for it. So the answer is lie,
deviate, just deflect.
Typical politics.
Running one of the This is a vicious
gang, Andrew. This is a vicious gang that
has He's saying, I'm not trying to ask
that. She's trying to yell over him. It's
a gang. It's a gang. It's a gang.
It's narrative control, and it's Ponzi in my
opinion. The lives of American women. Makes the
government filed in court, which says all And
you said yourself there are there are eight
criteria on that document. They need eight points.
And you are questioning the credibility of these
eight So wait. She now now she just
went away from it. Or, like, at first,
it was no. That's not true. And now
she's referencing the same eight points that he
was pointing to in one like, he hadn't
even stopped talking. And it started where it
was, you're wrong, and now it is right,
and you're wrong.
I mean, do these people even look at
themselves? They stand back and go, damn it.
That was a bad one. I ruined that.
It doesn't matter. In in the same conversation
that's not even done, you can take both
narratives and run with it. Sounds very Israeli
propaganda to me. We'll give you whatever you
want. You get to pick. Which one do
you prefer?
Who are putting their life on the line
to protect your life and the life of
everybody in this group and everybody across the
country. And their credibility should be questioned. They
finally have a president who is allowing them
to do their jobs, and god bless them
for doing it. Caroline.
God. That's scary.
I mean, at least she's better just training
over people. Like, she can put she can
string sentences together. She's way better than KJP,
but it's just it's the same shtick.
Let's go remember the question?
That what comment on these these points? Well,
she she essentially confirmed that it was real,
but just simply said it's complete even though
you started off by saying it wasn't real.
Well, as Glenn says again,
same BS we got from the Bush, Janie,
Obama war. So left right paradigm co continuing
to manipulate. But so the get the main
point is what she's trying to say there.
All of our criminals, they're all gang members,
even though we can prove that's not true.
Now, Aaron also puts this out,
the one we were already highlighting before,
the main points.
And the here's the document, guys. You can
literally look at this for yourself. Read through
it.
It says, in order for ICE to declare
someone an an alien enemy, ICE must first
determine if they are Venezuelan
over age
14, and then
second, find eight points on a scoring guide
they made up. It's four points for having
alleged gang tattoos and four points for displaying
gang logos.
That's two things, guys. So and then,
again, the random arbitrary things, they've declared tattoos
that are related to them. So if you
are Venezuelan
over a certain age and have a tattoo,
I guess, that is enough.
It says this checklist is shocking. A person
can be declared an alien enemy and realize
this is only because of the alien enemies
act.
So it's like everything else in COVID, the
emergency, and the stand the the, Defense Production
Act. Same thing. They're using this claim to
create an emergency
declaration that allows them to ignore what's otherwise
the reality.
This is this is just government today, guys.
But it says based only on communications with
someone I says is a member and nothing
more. Like the guy the the asset they
said claimed he was there. Even though no
one's proving that, the evidence fact shows that
it's not even true.
You get the point. You can read through
it, guys. It's all outlined.
Very clear. Links are at the bottom. Verify
it for yourself.
What's and crazy to me is that they're
so spun around this. So so I think
exposed
that they're just kinda throwing whatever at the
wall when they get confronted or using emotional
pushback to scare people into place.
Now it's important to understand where they are
sending these people.
This is the conversation. The article is from
the March March seventeenth.
Beatings, overcrowding, and food deprivation.
US Deportees face distressing human rights conditions in
El Salvador's mega prison. Now you could read
this one. It's it's rough, but I I
thought the best part to go for would
be just the Human Rights Watch article. This
is from March twentieth of this year. Human
Rights Watch declaration on prison conditions in El
Salvador for the, specific case, the j, JGG
versus Trump case.
Just wanted to get some some
bullet points.
The prison was first announced for a for
capacity of 20,000.
There hasn't been any improvements or additions.
They just randomly doubled it to 40,000.
Even though there's, I think, more than that
now, but the point is that it's about
expanding the capacity for need, not by there's
no needs being met here. Just like with
Israel. They're everything they're publicly telling you and
praising. Ben Gavira will walk through and praise
how terrible it is, and you can prove
what he's pointing to is a violation of
international law. They don't care like everything else.
These things are not in compliance with basic
human rights. Everyone knows that. That's why it's
being called out. Why and and they're funding
the building of torture camps here, and they're
sending people there. They have before. This is
not new, and they know they're breaking the
law. They don't care. They these people, the
US government and their allies are actively showing
you what they are.
Rampantly lawless.
Acting with might is right.
It says not be able to provide individualized
treatment to detainees, thereby contravening the UN standard
for minimum rules for the treatment of prisoners,
which, by the way, the US government, both
left and right, have called out about Iran,
in many cases,
incorrectly, or Venezuela.
So just pointing out that they'll happily scream,
you know, UN resolution,
international law when it applies to anybody they
don't like, but then ignore it at a
regular, consistent basis for themselves.
Now people held at Cicotte, this prison, as
well as in other prisons in El Salvador,
are denied communication with their relatives and lawyers,
that's already been proven,
and only appear, as I already told you,
before courts in online hearings,
often in large groups of several hundred people
at the same time.
So we already heard from them. Trump's going,
I don't even know if we can get
it back.
Because these people are treated like
I mean, I don't even know how to
frame this properly.
They're sent there for life, apparently, with no
process, no ruling.
They do hard labor. They get no sunlight.
They have you know, they're tortured. They're beat
up.
It's all it's all documented.
And maybe I don't even know why you
would think that's appropriate, but the way we
pretend, we we believe the country, the world
should be from the American narrative
for anybody, by the way, anybody,
let alone somebody who is not even a
criminal,
let alone somebody who didn't even break the
law at all and was here legally and
had no criminal record.
Just put just make pretend it's your father,
your mother, your son, your daughter, your sister
who just got sent there because they had
the wrong tattoo and they were in the
wrong place and are now in the prison
with some of the worst, hardest, most dangerous
people in the world.
By the way, many of which are working
alongside the prison guards and doing all sorts
of terrible things.
Just take a second and put aside your
political police and think about how alarming that
is. And let's be clear. That's not a
hypothetical. That's happening.
To what degree is the question?
The Salvadorian government has described people held in
Cicotte as, quote, terrorists
and has said they will, quote, never leave.
Even though even the people in their country
are not being given process.
This is what's important. Human Rights Watch is
not aware of any detainees who have been
released from that prison ever.
The government of Salvador denies human rights groups
access to its prisons and has only allowed
journalists and social media influencers to visit Cicotte
under highly controlled circumstances. You know, the old
North Korean tour.
In videos produced during these visits, Salvadorian authorities
are seen saying that prisoners only, quote, leave
their cell for thirty minutes a day. And
I but I understand that's not even accurate.
It's less, if not at all. But it
says, and that some are held in solitary
confinement cells, which are completely dark. The point
I was gonna make
is it says down here,
El Salvador literally passed an emergency law that
removed due process.
He realized there's more to this than just
coincidence, guys. This is where they're going.
And so the point is that you have
people in this country, in this prison that
have been put there because they decide to
with nothing else.
This is this is who your government's working
with as they pretend Syria, Iran, and they're
all the villains of the world as they're
literally working with the worst people on the
planet. Now you could agree. You could argue
Iran is the same thing if you want.
Yes. I disagree. The point though is that
you have to recognize who they are. You
don't work with these kind of places and
pretend you're the good guy, guys.
It says cases of torture, ill treatment, incommunicado
detention,
severe violations of due process, if at all,
and inhumane conditions such as lack of access
to adequate health care and food. And these
are basically benign with the reality of what
these prisons are like. These are just highlighting
clear, provable examples of crimes.
What they're doing is inconsistent. It's a violation
of international law. They know that. They don't
care. Clearly, they feel like they've got, and
it seems they do, the support and protection
of The US apparatus, you know, criminal gang.
It says prison conditions in El Salvador should
be understood within the context of the country's
three year long state of emergency,
which has suspended constitutional due process rights,
which, by the way, let's be real, is
never gonna come back unless something changes because
that's how these governments work. Governments never give
back power.
We're sadly gonna see that very soon in
this country, if not already.
Human Rights Watch estimates based on estimates based
on official data that there are 109,000
people held in prisons with an official capacity
for 70,000.
Since the state of emergency was instituted,
over three hundred and fifty people have died
in these prisons.
It's a pretty high rate.
Something something's happening. The people aren't just dying
from old age, guys. It says, we can
arrest anyone we want, was a,
what's it called? It was a a report
that the El Salvadorian prison system put out,
Literally entitled, we can't arrest anyone we want.
When they tell you who they are, you
gotta listen, guys.
In July 2024, Human Rights Watch published a
report on abuses committed against children during the
so called state of emergency
titled, quote, your child does not exist here.
Over oh, wait. I'm sorry. Make sure I
didn't
yeah. I thought so.
So the point is,
back to this, that there the over, it
says, in during the state of emergency that
is still ongoing, apparently,
the title that Human Rights Watch by our
report called Your Child Does Not Exist Here.
And it says over 3,300
children have been detained. Children.
Sound familiar?
Many without any ties to gang activity or
criminal organizations. Also sounds familiar.
Just happened to be the wrong person or
rather the right person in the wrong place.
Just, you know, certain affiliations, certain skin color.
It says Human Rights Watch documented sixty six
cases
of children
subjected to torture,
ill treatment, and appalling conditions, including at times
extreme overcrowding,
unhygienic conditions, and inadequate access to food and
medical care.
Children.
In February, the legislative assembly approved a law
ordering the transfer of children detained for organized
crime offenses without really having any crimes, as
we just highlighted, to the country's adult prison
system,
exposing them to a heightened risk of abuse
and violating international juvenile justice standards. So does
Israel every day.
Children, guys.
People children sent to these the same prisons
we're talking about
without any crime ever being proven, without many
of them not even being criminals.
It says police beat prison newcomers with batons
for an hour according to people that were
there.
When he when he denied being a gang
member,
they sent him back to a dark basement
with a in a cell with 320
detainees, where prison guards and other detainees beat
him every day.
How much of this is gonna sound so
shockingly similar to what we know is happening
elsewhere? Right?
He said he wasn't Hamas, so they beat
him until he said he was.
I mean, it should sound familiar. Right? Because
we just talked about this. Let me see
if I can still have it. I don't
think I do.
Yep.
Orthopedic surgeon colleague here who was,
taken out of the Operating Room. His fingers
were crushed. This is in Israel. Doctor speaking
about Israel.
They showed him a picture of his wife
from a spy, not not from a magazine
or an old photo. And, and they had
a a metadata
and said that it was taken the day
before,
up close and said we're gonna bring her
here in front of you, and and we're
gonna gang rape her in front of you
if you don't admit that you're Hamas, or
we'll keep breaking your fingers.
He still didn't admit he was Hamas, and
they said, well, then we're gonna send a
drone to your bedroom window and incinerate your
children, and he still wouldn't admit he was
Hamas. They beat him every You get it.
It goes on. K? These are doctors who
are witnessing this stuff.
So it's kind of eerie to see how
clear this is.
Right? I mean, to see that this is
like, that's what they're doing.
Right? So they're they're saying when he denied
being a gang member, they put him in
a group of people that beat him up
until he did it. Now it says so
was so crowded that detainees had to sleep
on the floor or standing. A description often
repeated by people who have been imprisoned in
El Salvador.
Now, this the important part appears, by the
way, the people in the prison as well
as the gang of member as the prison
guards collectively beating him. Now it says and
by the way, that's no different than US
prisons, guys. We have to understand how much
that overlap is here, where there there's an
operation that exists in there where prison guards
benefit wildly from facilitating the process. Now, I'm
not saying everyone everywhere, but we know that
exists.
Now, it says he was sent in a
group of other prisoners
to a different prison on the third day
where they ordered where they were ordered to
group
to the ordered the group to take off
their clothes. It's just one example of how
this works. They were then forced to kneel
on the ground, which sounds familiar, naked, looking
downwards for four hours in front of the
prison's gate. I don't know any other place
I've ever seen that happen other than Israel
with the members of pal people in Palestine,
Where they have them kneeling like this in
front of these I don't I where is
that I've seen that exclusively in Israel.
Maybe I'm just missing it, but realize how
interesting. Bukele
is a Zionist, guys. It's not a secret.
Now, it says guards took the group to
a room with five barrels full of water
with ice.
He said 15 guards forced him and others
to go into the barrels for around two
hours in total, ice barrels,
as they questioned him. The detainee was forced
into a barrel around 30 times as he
would was kept there for about a minute.
Guards forced his head underwater so he could
not breathe. He said, I felt like I
was drowning. Guards repeatedly insulted them, calling them
dogs and scum, and were saying they would
pay for what they had done. Now these
are people, again, not charged with crimes. There's
no due process, especially since, realize, we're talking
about people being sent to these prisons
like a gay barber
or a random son of a a 22
year old son of a mom who's screaming
about where her son has gone, who simply
had the wrong tattoo, who was here legally
in the country, or the other seven, eight,
nine, 10 of these people we've talked about
that you can prove,
who leave it's doubling down and going, they're
dangerous gang members, and we can prove it.
No. No. They're not. And you're lying about
that, and your own documents prove that. But
this is what they're dealing with.
They sent them here for a reason.
Doctors who visited detention sites told us that
tuberculosis,
fungal infections, scabies, severe malnutrition, and chronic digestive
issues were common. You know why that doesn't
matter? Because they're not even trying to treat
these people. They don't care if people get
sick. They're not trying to help them.
This is the reality we're seeing in every
single dynamic of Israeli detention centers or the
black sites for The United States.
Number 14. In one case, a person who
had died in custody was buried in a
mass grave without the family's knowledge.
US policy 2025.
A third man described being kicked by guards
in his neck and abdomen after which he
sustained injuries requiring an operation for a ruptured
pancreas and spleen, month long hospitalization, and sixty
days of post release treatment. There was a
lot more. This is a documented, sourced Human
Rights Watch investigation.
Doesn't mean she blind trust it. Look into
it. The reality is this is what everybody
on the situate this is what El Salvador
proudly display displays.
So the New Republic, rather just wanted to
highlight this point, Homeland Security secretary's El Salvador
stunt just got worse. Now you can read
more about the whole thing. I just wanna
point out everything we just saw, what we
could prove,
knowing that there was a lot of innocent
people with no criminal records who were legally
in the country, who are in that prison
with some of the most dangerous people in
the world.
This is what she did.
Caught today and, visiting this facility. And first
of all, I wanna thank El Salvador and
their president for their partnership with The United
States Of America to bring our terrorists
here and to incarcerate them and have consequences
for the violence that they have perpetuated in
our communities.
I also want everybody to know if you
come to our country illegally, this is one
of the consequences you could face. Wow. Just
for coming illegally to the country?
Even if you're going through the gates and
asking for asylum? Apparently.
So, I mean, even if you believe that,
why in the world would it be
the legal, constitutional, even international law to send
somebody in this country who simply broke immigration
law with no criminal record to a concentration
camp in El Salvador? Why wouldn't you send
them to a prison in this country?
Why wouldn't you send them to a jail?
I mean, it's it's a it's a minor
thing in the real context of what's going
on in the world. It still was a
crime and it should be dealt with if
somebody is trying to break the law. But
somebody who's coming through asking for asylum who
in that medium process is still considered a
legal alien
should not be treated this way
because that violates our own understanding of the
law. The bottom the bottom line is she's
standing there behind with a bunch of dangerous
looking people behind her simply saying this is
everything even though we've proven I mean, look.
I would love for somebody to show me
one.
I'm not saying it's not. In fact, I
argue you're probably gonna have plenty of them,
but please, somebody prove to me that any
one of the people they sent were actually
people members of the gang.
Any of them. Because I have not seen
that proven. They have not even tried to
prove that. So as she stands there telling
you all these people are criminals we sent,
even though we can prove to you seven
or more of them are not, and we're
here legally,
I would like to find out if literally
any of them were, or if this is
some kind of grotesque Israel manufactured torture dynamic
for people that stood up and spoke about
them. I'm it's it's pretty disgusting. Right? And
as somebody points out that I think they
did a whole post about this. She's wearing,
like, a hundred thousand dollar Rolex or whatever
it is on her wrist while she's standing
there. And people ask, like, how did she
get that? How could she afford that? Well,
you know, there's a lot of reasons, a
lot of questions to answer there, a lot
of funding coming in from certain lobbying groups.
But who knows? At the end of the
day, she wants you to believe they're all
bad and that this is the stunt to
do it. And she also spent a lot
of funds from her local dynamic to go
there, which shouldn't be okay, but who cares?
First of all, do not come to our
country illegally.
You will be removed and you will be
prosecuted. But know that this facility Oh oh,
prosecuted.
Wait a minute. That that requires presiding that's
presenting evidence.
That's levying accusations and going to court.
Apparently, that's not what happens. Maybe you don't
even understand your own administration's
policies because they just skipped over all of
that. Prosecuted is not what just happened. They
just deported them on an allegation.
Again,
they know what they're doing.
They know what they're doing is wrong. They
know what they're doing is a violation of
the con of your rights of of the
constitution. That's why they say things like that.
That's why they were so in the beginning,
they still, in many cases, try to make
it only about visas because they think they
have more standing there. They're trying to manipulate
you. I'm talking to the right. I'm talking
to Republicans out there. They're trying to manipulate
you into undermining what you believe in most.
I don't know what else should make you
more angry than that. Is one of the
tools in our toolkit that we will use
if you commit crimes against the American people.
Nope. Because a crime requires evidence,
allegations,
charges.
That's not what you're doing.
It's just disgusting.
And so the stunt should be an outrageous
thing. If she stood there and tried to
do this for no reason, she didn't just
stand there in front of a prison to
make the case. She could've said this anywhere.
It's a stunt
that she spent a lot of money on
for no reason. And the reality is they're
lying to you.
Now, I really hope we don't miss this,
guys, because this is one of the most
important parts about this. Even if it was
floated to scare you, which it that very
well could be the case. And And who
else would it be for other than Israel?
Because everything they're doing is about people who
speak up about Israel. That's not even my
opinion.
So when he says, talking about sending any
people again, the context, whether it's about Teslas
or anything else, about sending people they deemed
terrorists to this prison, and he doesn't even
bock at it. He doesn't even flinch.
Yes. That's the reality, and we may do
that.
And I just wanna thank him. He's going
through a lot,
what they're doing to him.
And these people are gonna be caught, and
they they're gonna be caught, and they're gonna
be prosecuted.
And from what they tell me, I see
this just by watching your programs
and reading the news. But from what they
tell me, they could get twenty years in
jail, and they'll get it. I'll tell you,
there's gonna be no leniency and there'll be
no pardons.
I can tell you that right now. Twenty
years in jail and then maybe they get
you said this morning twenty years in jail
and then maybe they'll go to one of
these prisons in El Salvador. Do you think
with the way that the judges have been
issuing injunctions,
it would be easier or harder to send
these Tesla domestic terrorists
to a jail in El Salvador than these
MS 13 or trendy arrival guys? Well, I
view these people as terrorists just like,
others.
When I looked at those, showrooms burning
Right. There's no way to miss this. People
in the comments are like, hey. They didn't
even say that. They're probably bots or just
trying to deceive people so they don't look.
But Tesla terrorists,
yes, they're terrorists. If you look at the
showrooms burning,
pretty simple. And those cars, not one or
two, like, seven, eight, 10 burning, exploding all
over the place.
These are terrorists. Right.
Would it be easier? And now let's be
clear. Before this little statement, he already said
this. He floated the idea about the these
people getting sent to El Salvador on a
it was a truth social post, very public.
Then that's why Ducey here followed up and
said,
you know, reiterate that. So he said again,
yes. I think they're terrorists. There's no error
in this conversation, guys. Would it be easier
or less to send these people? Yes. They're
terrorists is what his answer was. He's talking
about American citizens sent to a foreign country
for a crime committed in this country or
the allegation of a crime
is small as vandalism.
Or even the most extreme in the conversation,
which would be a combination of arson and
vandalism,
is a federal crime and could be up
to twenty years. So it's not even that
outrageous for the person that committed that crime.
But not everybody, they're just broadly scooping in
because they claim it's this coordinated thing, which
maybe it is, but we should damn well
demand
that they prove these claims. But, see, we're
in this kind of weird quasi, you know,
no more source material Twitter files dynamic where
they just go to the thing, and they
go, yeah, the thing, and they all just
rush ahead. That's partisanship.
But as I said, Trump floats sending American
citizens to an El Salvadorian prison. This is
an attack on all you believe you're fighting
for under the thin veneer of fighting Democrats.
They're already there are already laws in place
to hold these people accountable.
Very much so.
Now the last part of this before we
finish with some overlaps to Israel,
Ricky Leagues put this out on the thirtieth.
You probably already saw it. Had hundreds of
foreign students in The United States have been
told, and I actually think this kinda stems
from that one guy basically choosing to deport
himself. They probably like, oh, that was a
good idea. And so they said, there are
now foreign students in The US who have
been told they must self deport,
or they will be forcibly deported
for campus activism.
This is WikiLeaks.
Including attending protests or posting on social media.
Very it's you can I'm gonna read you
from the article. It's very clear. This comes
after the launch of an AI system.
Guess what? An AI system
called catch and revoke.
It's all falling into place, isn't it, guys?
Now how long until they repurpose that AI
system to just anybody not saying the right
things on social media, not having a high
enough social credit system or score or, you
know, I don't know, just challenging whatever the
new thing is you're not supposed to challenge
because the government
says. I, you know, I say in the
last couple of weeks, I've said this a
lot, but
I have never, in my time doing this,
ever seen something so vividly in the wrong
direction, so clearly.
I mean, for years, we've all been talking
about this kind of thing, whether it's taking
the guns or free speech for years.
And in in in all of my time
doing this, I've never seen a more striking
and obvious example of exactly what we've all
been worried about.
Just because they use the thing they know
some of you don't like,
and in some cases, Democrats, some cases, immigrants.
It's just a
minor shift to an AI system that's about
catch and revoke. I mean, he just made
the case for why that can happen to
people bombing Teslas or even scratching Teslas. They
don't even need to change the name. They
can just broaden the scope and say, well,
now your your citizens have revoked because you
did what we call a terrorism.
It's all right there in front of you.
Hey. Maybe it never happens. I hope not.
Maybe it's all a scare tactic. It's obviously
possible.
And may maybe the Democrats roll it out
with the next administration because it's all the
same thing.
God. So crazy.
Now, again, the point overlapping back to the
beginning with Palantir and XAI, it's an AI
system. They're using AI to map out everything
and scoop your data from all these massive
billion dollar systems to train what are they
gonna train the system that will be used
to catch and revoke, to control your life.
It says, which trolls social media for politically
incorrect speech?
The woke right, ladies and gentlemen.
The exact thing that they were trying to
push back on, they're now supporting.
I don't believe most of them. I believe
men I think most of them are going,
what the f? I think that. I can't
prove it.
You are now going after people with her
politically incorrect speech. How is that not the
same Democrats you thought you were fighting?
Speaking to reporters, Rubio said, quote, every time
I find one of these lunatics,
I take away their visas.
At some point, I hope we run out,
he says. I'll that's, like, I'll quote from
the article. The point being
that you just broad stroke what most I
mean, look. Everyone we can actually prove has
already been shown to be here legally or
at the very least not breaking other laws
and already and got due process removed. Most
of the ones we talked about were legally
and no criminal record.
And every time we find one of these
lunatics yeah. So what they're doing is just
finding someone that meets the criteria, and they're
yanking these things. Even the worst of the
worst would still get due process.
So they're just brazenly admitting
that your rights don't matter to them, guys.
Not just Democrats,
but anyone,
Americans included at large.
And
Dana McAdams says, this is anti American.
We value speech.
Apparently, not all of us.
I do believe it's the majority.
Now this is f one visas. That's what
are being revoked in this context, but it's
more than that. Is is why US is
asking hundreds of international students to self deport.
I mean, even that is so it's sort
of insulting.
Right? Self deport.
So you have to spend the resources. They're
not breaking the law. I mean, that's it's
insane. But it says, hundreds of international students
studying in The United States have received emails
from the depart from the Department of State
telling them to self support as their f
one visas, student visas,
have been revoked owing to campus activism.
So remember the game in the beginning where
it was like, well, they're here illegally, and
they're terrorism.
So the best they could do now is
claim that you simply supported or protested
for something we say is supporting terrorism.
I've never seen something so flimsy in my
life. And and we can prove that most
of them were simply saying, stop the genocide.
And they are not even they're not they're
not even they're going just go get out
of the country for us. Don't even make
it. Just get out. Self deport for
for for politically protected speech,
for activism, whatever it's about.
Where are all the honest Republicans screaming about
this, guys? I know they're out there.
Most conservatives in the middle are talking a
lot about this, but the people that are
really tapped into the center
of the of the Republican side of this,
most of which are teams for Republicans in
my opinion. But, guys, there's plenty of you
that I know have a line.
How is this not it?
It says the crackdown is not limited to
students who physically participated,
not even physically in the activism,
but people who simply shared
or even liked
what they said were anti national posts.
Guys, that's so over the top.
So people who simply saw a protest of
something going, you know, pro freeze Palestine, and
they liked that post, They're now getting they're
now being emailed saying, we want you to
leave the country
for anti national post. This is authoritarianism.
This is fascism.
That's that's not a political thing, guys. I
think that both both sides of our paradigm
are actively driving you there.
It says the dictate followed US Secretary Of
State Rubio's announcement about the revocation of several
international students' visas for so called anti national
activities.
It's it's you know, again, if you look
at history, this is the beginning of pretty
much every authoritarian severe situation that you can
see. It all starts like this.
Now it says, quote, it might be more
than 300 at this point. 300
for that kind of stuff.
We do it every day, he says. That's
the other point. Saying, I hope we run
out because we've done it so much. The
guy he just the guy's tried to double
down to give himself security, hoping that if
he just yells loud enough that he's right,
the people will just fall back and let
it happen.
It says, I take their visa away. Every
country in the world has the right to
decide who comes in and who gets yeah.
You're right. In the process, you can do
that. Now that they've been given a visa,
they're required to have due process. That is
the law. They just he just keeps trying
to skip over this with the same flimsy
broad arguments of, well, we could deny whoever
we want. Yeah. No one's disputing that. That's
the same thing Levitt did to the woman,
the guy asking a question. He go, I
didn't ask that. You're not even listening to
me. Ah, you're a terrorist. You don't support
them.
So same point to to to Rubio. The
the point is, well, they would get deprocessed.
I'm not talking about when they come in
first. Well, I have the right when they
first come in, and they they lied, and
so we get to move. No. You don't.
You are wrong, and they know they're wrong.
That's why I go back to desperate.
You'd think they'd be able to paint something
better than this if they had other options.
Quote, at some point, I hope we run
out because we've gotten rid of all of
them.
But we're looking every day for these lunatics.
They and the followers scream they're all lunatics
because Rubio said. You know, by the way,
even though Rubio was the one primarily inviting
Venezuelans to this country under the guys that
Maduro so bad, come takes refuge
in the country of your savior, and then
now arresting them and putting them in prisons.
This is what happens when you lean into
the worst people on the planet. Right? It's
like when you what you could look at
all the people that they're working with.
You know, people like Osama Hussein, by the
way, or Osama bin Laden,
or
I mean, you go down the list. They're
allies until they're suddenly not. The point is
that they use those Venezuelans to act like
they were there to help because Maduro is
so bad even though they were the ones
manufacturing the situation. And then when they showed
up, in some cases, they were arrested then.
I talked about it all the way back
then.
But here we are. Many of them were
there from that conversation, and he's the one
in charge now of putting them in prison.
Just it's just the it's just vile. These
people are bad.
On behalf of the United States Department of
State, the Bureau of Consular Affairs, Visa Office
were hereby informs you
that additional information
became available after your Visa was issued. See?
They're this is them trying to paint the
picture that you lied.
You came in this country planning to protest
against things you don't believe in. Oh my
god.
What they're what they're making out to be
is terrorism. If you would have wrote down,
as he keeps repeating, that you were gonna
do these violent protests and commit terrorism, then
we wouldn't let you in. Yeah. Duh.
The point is that that's not what happened.
And even then, like, about protesting, what if
they came in and then decided to protest
it later? They should just they're just lying
to you. This is the best they can
do. This is as a result, your f
one visa is now revoked,
which is a crime. That's not due process.
That's not how this works. And that's why
the judges are ruling as such, and their
best response is they're radical, which probably doesn't
change the fact that they're right.
Now Patrick Kennison
says Israel now publicly is bragging about its
right or its power over US speech. Not
the first time.
Netanyahu speaking about this and, former ambassador of
Friedman
openly telling you that these people and I'll
just I'll listen to it for yourself about
the very people we're talking about. I'm pretty
sure it's been proven at this point. I
shouldn't say pretty sure we just went over
it that most I mean, if not all
that we can see
are nonviolent,
not criminal record,
here legally.
And this is what Netanyahu has to say.
Now ask yourself where you think this mindset's
coming from when this is what's being driven
in by the foreign government.
These ignorant demonstrators.
Who are they demonstrating
for for these murderers, these rapists?
Nope. And in fact, the rape is a
lie. Even Israel approved that, and you know
that. They're protesting for Palestinian freedom.
Simple. This mass killers.
This is a reflection of a deep rot
that has pervaded the intellectual hub of free
societies. And
He's right. And he represents it. But what
he's doing is pointing to the people trying
to stop him from doing that. Accuse them
of that which you are guilty. Classic Nazi
propaganda is where it comes from. This vilification
of Israel, the Jewish people. Nope. We're only
talking about Israel. The conflation of those two
things is how he tricks people. And western
values.
Yeah. Which they don't have entirely in this
country. I mean, look into what they're practicing
in this country. And there's plenty of Israelis
to speak out about these things, but by
and large,
the the sick rotting society is what Zionism
has done to Israel. Has been propagated by
a systemic alliance
between the ultra progressive left
and radical Islam.
Of course. The the straight up fact free
lumer argument. Right? They're all a bunch of
Islamic terrorists. Well, it's interesting that I don't
see that it's illegal to criticize Islam in
this country or that it's illegal to I
mean, you can go on with a hundred
thousand examples.
The old Voltaire quote or attributed, you know.
Right? To know who rules over you, find
out who you're not allowed to criticize. I
can criticize the like, in this country, apparently,
right now, you can criticize yesterday about everything
except Israel. But that doesn't always prove everything.
The bottom line
And radical Islam. Is that radical Islam is
something that he personally and the US government
have been proven to been funding for decades.
Hamas is obvious. The point is you can
prove this over and over and over, whether
it is Saudi Arabia in general or the
moderate rebels or every single example of Osama
bin Laden that they worked with. Let's not
forget the Washington Post called Osama bin Laden
a warrior of peace before he became the
biggest boogeyman alive.
This is always how this goes. They have
collectively funded the most radical elements of Islam
as far back as you wanna look. That's
why the evidence is pouring out right now
because people are finally carrying to look.
But he's trying to paint the same picture.
No. No. No. It's not that. It's what
we want you to think as Zionism is
infiltrating everything in the world.
It must be resolutely fought by civilized societies
to safeguard their future.
This is why we must all come in.
President Trump's decisive actions against antisemitism.
Right. You know, the quint the the fundamentally
unconstitutional things they're doing. Yay. Freedom America.
Also, let's not forget this man standing here
has multiple indictments and most of his country
right now is clamoring for him to be
arrested.
Look it up. I mean, it's wildly public.
What's crazy is that we're being told we
have to support them as our chief ally
when this guy is leading the most radical,
extremist, dangerous group I've seen in power in
a really long time.
And his own country is saying that.
It's not hard to look up. I just
don't know why we can't have this honest
conversation unless it's because this group has completely
taken control of our government.
I'm not I mean, I do think that,
but you can decide for yourself, guys. It
is transparent
that the influence is coming directly from these
maniacs
and not even the entirety of the country
or the government because you can see them
calling these people out. So this feels like
a desperate
pulling of every string they have to avoid
what seems to be coming that the world
sees who they are and what they're doing,
Zionism.
And those strings are tied directly to the
feet, arms, head, face, tongue of every con
person in this country who has a political
position of power. That's what it feels like.
You tell me where I'm missing something.
And we must pressure
other governments
to do the same.
A government can do in two months more
than any organization can do in its lifetime.
Yes. And so when we talk about,
the importance of,
a bipartisan fight against antisemitism,
which of course I endorse and I as
my predecessor said, I condemn
antisemitism
on the right and on the left. I'm
an equal opportunity condemner of Right. So the
the the point is they're going after everyone
who does not tow a certain line, and
it's not of antisemitism because we've already proven
this 50,000 times over. I mean, the ADL
can get caught
publicly reported even by Jewish groups that they
were simply calling everything Palestine
antisemitism or, you know, whatever it is. Over
and over every year, as far back as
you wanna look, these things keep getting exposed.
Or that you get ADL gets caught doing
a fake Nazi march through Chicago.
They're all easily proven. I've done entire shows
on this stuff.
The bottom line is that they're trying to
control speech through one narrative, and it works
for all authoritarians, quite frankly. But all they're
really saying is that we can control the
way you speak in this country.
And antisemitism
is just a tool that's used. And you
have
f a IEF agents, Mossad agents, for leaders
in Israel who've all spoken out about how
that's the tool that they publicly like, within
their circles, that's what they acknowledge. We use
this to control the way they think it's
me. It's all public.
That should matter to you.
As Patrick says, Israel now publicly bragging it
can power or has power over US speech.
Daniel McAdams says the noose around free speech
is starting to tighten. It will not stop
with deporting foreign students who write op eds.
I agree. And here's this is this is
all happening right now. This is from,
the thirtieth.
NYU
has now canceled a speech
by the former president of Doctors Without Borders
because she was going to discuss the genocide
in Gaza.
A slide about the death toll in Gaza,
quote, could be perceived as antisemitic.
My god.
You see and look, do you know why?
Because the schools are now terrified to step
a foul of Trump's draconian anti Semitism policies,
where they're gonna say, well, fine. We're gonna
yank everything we possibly can. We're gonna pressure
you to get fired. The Loomers and Benny
Johnson of the world will screw will tar
and feather you across social media until everyone
pushes back. That's how this works. And what
did they do?
Invited someone to talk about something that could
be proven. Doctors Without Borders has been bombed
by Israel in Gaza more or rather in
West Bank more than once. I think also
in Gaza, to be honest, or in Lebanon,
we've seen that as well.
The bottom line is they were going to
highlight numbers that have been roundly proven by
different groups including,
was it British Medical Journal or The Lancet?
It was The Lancet.
Or Human Rights Watch or or, I mean,
on and on and on and on. Human
and Amnesty did their own investigation and confirmed
the same
thing. But no. No. That might be antisemitic
or might be
seen, could be perceived
dishonestly as antisemitism. So anything that makes his
hair look bad now becomes antisemitism. That's not
even like a secret. They're basically read their
definition. It's anything that you meant says we're
doing something wrong because you hate Jews, apparently.
Or maybe because they're committing genocide and starving
children to death and raping people in prisons,
but, you know, I'm a racist, apparently.
Dave Smith says, does this settle the who's
woke debate?
Rabbi tells the senate
antisemitism
that it is it says, hey,
being anti he says it's weird to read
it that way. Rabbi tells senate hearing on
antisemitism
that it's not enough to be not antisemitic.
One must be anti
antisemitic.
And this goes back to previous arguments, guys.
This has been something actually, I'll I'll read
what he says here.
Well, this first. So, basically, Dave Smith
is calling out the woke right, guys. Because
if you don't recognize the what that means,
there's people trying to kind of undermine the
terms.
It simply means people who are using cancel
culture. I you know, I ideological driven arguments,
censorship based on hate speech. These are the
main tenets, guys, and you can see the
exact same things all over the place. I'll
talk about it more in another cup upcoming
show, but people like Kat Turd and the
rest are screaming people should be put in
prison because they dared to, in some cases,
legitimately scratch a Tesla.
Or in in some cases, women saying mean
things about Trump, and they're like, put them
in jail.
I mean, it's insane, and they are the
woke right. In fact, I think they probably
don't even care. I think that's what their
job is. The end of the day, if
you had any self awareness, you'd be like,
wow. I am the same thing we were
all screaming about thirty seconds ago, but they
don't. But here's the clip. As Dave Smith
says, does this settle who's the who's woke
debate?
Antisemitism
is not just an age old prejudice.
It is a contemporary
crisis manifesting on campuses
across the nation.
It is not enough for individuals or institutions
to merely claim they are not antisemitic.
As my father once taught me, it is
not enough for people, especially public figures,
to be neutral or not be anti Semitic.
One must be anti anti Semitic.
We must demand the same of our universities
and government institutions. Okay. So the reason that's
important
as I think Candace Owens was back and
forth to somebody. It's like, look. It's it's
how is it not enough to just be
against antisemitism?
Alright. Or just to say that I'm like,
to be like, look. I'm not antisemitic or
I'm not racist. I don't say anything negative
about any group because of their skin color.
Right? But, no, he says, the point is,
they're saying you have to mobilize against
it. You have to stand up and do
something about it. Otherwise, you're anti Semitic. No.
That's not how that works. Frankly, you don't
even have to be anything. If we pretend
in this country, as always, you could think
and say what you want, which would include
being racist against Jewish people or racist against
black people, whatever you want. I have the
right to say you're gross. That's how it
works.
The idea that we've ever got to a
point to where you can see you're not
allowed or think bad things or say bad
things about this group, which, by the way,
was exactly what the left was doing. But
see, they tricked you by going after things
they knew you wouldn't agree with, and now
you're being trapped in the other direction.
They're simply telling you that you have to
think and say the way in certain categories
what we think and say. That's it.
That doesn't apply in any conversation, and the
only one where it has to, according to
them, is when it comes to Israel.
I don't know how you miss these things.
It's the most This hearing in my I've
ever seen. The most obvious thing I've ever
seen. Now, Chris, may Menhan says in the
same point,
And he just points out, didn't conservatives mock
Ibram x,
Kendi for saying the same stuff?
Of course, they did. Of course, in the
background, the reality is that you attack the
left for doing the thing that you think
is dumb. And then what happens on your
side, it's okay because we we agree with
the ideology over here or vice versa.
Same damn thing everywhere you look.
Patrick says it's clear in regard to WikiLeaks
about the self deportation
that Donald Trump is betraying our constitution and
the most important provision, the first amendment.
Same with Marco Rubio, state department.
Remember
your oath. Oh, I don't I don't think
they care, or let's not forget, Trump didn't
even take an oath on a bible, which
I do think matters.
And Elon and the rest of them apparently
didn't either, not Rubio.
Now it says you are allowing a foreign
lobby to dictate how protected speech is interpreted.
History will not look well on what you
have done here. Now look.
It's not it's it's it's could be perceived
as a small point. But if we're truly
beginning to recognize the influence that this foreign
government has on this government,
would it not be worth considering that they
were at least, you know,
give chose not to swear an oath on
the bible because there are certain radical Jewish
people that want that to be something different?
It's worth asking. Now realize, again, Zionism is
not just about Jewish people, but there is
a very clear overlap of Jewish supremacy. Just
like on the Christian side, there's the same
dynamic. Or atheist, Zionists who are maniacs. There's
there all all of it exists.
And for those that just might want to
make it about something else, oh, it's the
wrong one.
I just I I always think it's worth
pointing out. This is not I'm I I'm
not even saying that because that's exactly the
the bottom line is, here is
the leading Israeli human rights group that says
a regime of Jewish supremacy.
The point is to say that is not
to imply that's what this is all about.
Maybe it is. You can decide for yourself,
but it is part of this. The Jewish
power party, I believe that's Ben Gavir's party,
is literally what they call themselves.
Can you have a, like, a white power
party? Yeah. We all know that. That's a
that's racist. Right? It's just insane. The point
is, though, these are all rabid Zionists who
are using Judaism to hide behind. And there's
a huge faction of or of Orthodox Jews
in the world that are calling that out.
My point though is to make sure you
see that, yes, that is part of it.
That's why it's a nuanced conversation, and making
it only about one of these groups is
the trap.
But that's the point to think about.
When, you know, the swearing your oath
isn't that interesting?
But Daniel simply says Trump and his people
have exposed themselves as even more fascist than
Biden's thugs. I did not know that was
possible. They actually hate America.
It starts to feel that way despite their
screaming claims.
Well, to end in general with the Israel
overlap,
here's Donald Trump
saying America First, patriot,
Randy Fine, who we've talked about a lot
on this show that seems everyone's finally starting
to recognize as a maniac,
is is running to represent the wonderful people
of Florida. This is the, I think, the
second or third time he's endorsed him so
publicly.
A highly successful Harvard educated businessman with greatly
respected state legislator has been tremendous voice for
MAGA. Very important to understand all this.
The rest of it is just what he
wants you to hear about him. Champion over
this and that, peace for that. P oh,
of course. Advance peace through strength, of course,
because it's all about violence to achieve our
ends. Randy Fine has my complete and total
endorsement.
That's the important part. Well,
j x girl says, are you effing kidding
me?
This guy is hated in Florida by conservatives,
which is pretty publicly true. He says, this
is Randy Fine hiding under his desk when
he was served being served. After this video
went viral, he tried to change the law
in Florida so servers couldn't record his
his fat ASS
hiding.
Now I'm not sure what he's being served
for here.
I think it's actually about the fact that
he's, I mean, there's there's a lot of
crimes he's committing just by what he says,
to be quite frank.
You can see him duck down in the
beginning. Behind the desk.
Under the desk.
Right there.
This is ridiculous.
He's kind of a coward if you ask
me. But the point
is he's getting money from APAC, First and
foremost. This guy is simply saying, here's the
other candidate not, but who knows? Maybe that
guy will start getting it too if he
gets input in power. But then Elon Musk
goes, very important.
Because apparently, his his Twitter bot was told
to say that.
But Patrick Henningson says,
a foreign lobby has literally purchased our entire
government.
This is not going to end well for
anyone. And here is James Lee responding to
Donald Trump
saying America First patriot, Randy Fine,
who has the Israel flag and a Medora
front center in front of the is the
American flag.
That's the picture he put out where The
US flag is cropped out.
I mean, you could decide to pretend that
that's an accident. I don't know how that
would be possible
or rather, you know, unlikely, I would argue,
But everyone seems to see this. Here he
is, America's First patriot or America First patriot
as Trump claims it,
demanding Americans who distribute flyers to critical of
Israel get five years in jail for, quote,
hateful littering.
Yeah. The woke ride for Israel seems to
be the point.
And then he follows up saying, no. The
bill did pass, by the way, and was
ceremoniously signed into law by Ron DeSantis
while in Israel.
That's not a joke.
How is it even allowed to sign US
legislation in a foreign country?
Here he is going made a secret trip
to is to Jerusalem.
But Santis,
the strongest anti semitism
bill in The United States, by the way,
are are completely unconstitutional
like every other one is. By saying somebody
can't be anti anything is a violation of
your rights, and we all know that. Supreme
courts have ruled this many times. They just
don't stop.
Ask Abbott in Texas. These guys jam these
things through, anti BDS, all sorts of things.
Then he goes to Florida's Nazi thugs, otherwise
known as the conservatives that disagree with him,
by the way. I have news. Attack Jews
on their property, you're going to prison. Well,
guess what, moron? You attack anybody in the
property, you're going to prison. We see, they're
making it more
criminal
if they claim it's motivated by hate, and
that is the woke left and right, guys.
And then he then he literally says never
again means never again unless we're ignoring the
ongoing genocide because it's not against the against
a group that we don't like.
Well, Candace Owens calls out something we've been
trying to call attention to for a while.
He says, this is who president Trump just
endorsed for office. This absolutely appalling and reveal
and revealing as to who is in charge
of the White House. Any person who can
look at the picture of a murdered
baby
and mock it is a monster.
Do not vote for this genocidal pig.
And I said, he's one of many. Here's
my post from 03/22/2025.
This Trump endorsed politician has been outspoken since
October or, yeah, since October 7 that all
Palestinians are the enemy, even the children. And
I'm talking he he explicitly
makes that case.
Yes. The children killed them all. Like, he's
outspoken about it. Here's today's example I said
on March 22. And this is the the
the thing she was showing. This is just
the real breakdown on screenshot. So here he
up here is making a case, and the
person basically says, you know, called him up
for something.
And he's responding. And this person says, supporting
killing innocent people and babies and smearing voices
that fight against genocide for some APAC money,
says a lot about your character. You should
be ashamed of yourself. How do you sleep
at night? And shows a dead baby that
was dug up. This was a real shot
of a baby being dug up from bombs
that were bombing Gaza.
He says, quite well, actually. Thanks for the
pick.
That's who Trump has supported. That's that is
milk toast in in in compared to what
he's done many other times, and I'll show
them to you.
Did I have it up twice? I guess
so.
So
this is the one I put up today
saying, since people are finally calling out Trump's
continued support for the monster that is Randy
Fine, take a look at his timeline.
Before Twitter helps him scrub it, I'm willing
to bet you that's probably already happening whether
Twitter or him, whatever,
and see how common it is. Here's what
he said on June 8. Owen Jones said
every single politician and commenter celebrating Israel's military
operation should be asked a straightforward question. Do
you think killing over 200 Palestinians, including many
kids, is an acceptable price for four released
Israeli hostages?
Get them to say it on the record.
He says, yes. Bombs away.
These are bad people, like, objectively. I don't
care what you make the conversation about. That's
disgusting.
Subhuman.
Here's another one
that says, this is what so many of
you are giddy about.
Some of the patients,
we had to remove both eyes. This is
the pager bombing.
Ten five to ten years. That's now Israel
said ten recently. So the point at least
five years later, after they released these pagers
into the end of the world, and mostly
women and children were the ones hurt. That's
a provable fact.
This says some of the patients we had
to remove both their eyes. It killed me,
she said. In the past twenty five years
in practice, I've never removed as many eyes
as I did yesterday.
And again, understand, on the record, the vast
majority
are women and children.
He says, yep. Eyes away.
That's who Trump just endorsed.
Now seven seas
showed a bunch of these.
He says there's so many. Just search bombs
away from his profile. This guy lusts for
death like a psychopath. Now, yeah, I think
honestly, I think whether it's the case or
not, which it seems to be, he's just
doing what Israel wants, and he seems to
be like a sycophant.
You gave them money, I'll say what you
want. They probably I mean, I this is
not me proving anything. I'm just saying with
this the way we know this works.
They just like like with the,
god, I forgot his name all again or
or again.
The big
guy. God, it drives me crazy. He's the
guy that's the guy that's been so shamelessly
pro Israel because I think he's just too
dumb to know what's going on around him.
The guy, you know, well before he had
a brain issue, the guy was clearly not
intelligent. The bottom line is that he is
just like, or even like a Michael Rapaport.
Like, it's just it's just you could just
see them just being given things and just
putting them out. And let's not forget, that's
been proven
that that is the dynamic. The Israeli government
is basically paying people just dump things they
give them online. It's very it's been that's
come out in mainstream media.
So when you see a guy like this,
who is just so aggressively over the top,
I think that's what Israel wants to display
in our government,
but he could just also be that crazy.
Oh, yeah. It's a a
that's not Fetterman. Thank you.
This guy was referring to as Fetterman. I
mean, he is
I mean, he it's he's pro he's pro
Israel in many cases that are explicitly anti
America, like, over the top. They don't care.
That's why Randy Fine has an Israeli flag
first and foremost in his office.
But here, just to give you a couple
examples, you could look at all these for
yourself.
It's time for Israel to retake Rafa and
end Hamas. Well, bombs away. There's the there
are more that I that I think are
more relevant about not just bomb them, which
matters, but the kind of things that are
like,
look at all the kids that died, and
he goes, good. They deserve it. Things like
that. It's all over his timeline.
Special delivery from. May it rain down from
heaven. Deliver
deliver by god himself to act to avenge
those babies, which, again, all these claims and
lies they were putting out. But my point
is, the main ones we showed you in
the continuing down the list, you'll find examples
of him being brazen,
about children being okay, that they're all terrorists.
Right? It's it's about all Palestinians. He reiterates
that.
And then here's Elon Musk.
This guy saying anti white racism should not
be tolerated. And Musk says racism of any
kind is unacceptable.
Oh, is it, Elon?
I guess only in certain context, though. Right?
And so I said, now do Israel and
Zionism.
Or how about Randy Fine and anything? Like,
you guys are such gross hypocrites. Like, let's
not pretend like it's not obvious that Elon
Musk is is in his own ways a
racist in plenty of context.
That's it's just you can recognize that. It's
not a left right point. The guy is
actively choosing sides in all sorts of racial
divides. The point is that you can't keep
making this about politics, about everything in these
colors, then broad stroking every Muslim in Europe,
for example. It's disgusting, and you're a bad
person for doing so. The bottom line is
that if you can't call out the most
obvious example of racism on the planet, then
you act you really don't believe in fighting
or that you don't think racism is a
problem.
Zionism
is racism.
Israel cannot be both. Israel is either
a racist Jewish state or it's a democratic
state for everybody, and that's what I would
like Israel to be. I'd like
a democratic solution, one state with equal rights
for,
all its inhabitants.
It's obviously lame. I don't wanna play the
whole thing again. He talks about the the
nation state law where they enshrine the reality
that it's the state for the Jews alone
and makes the case that it's it's inherently
racist because it is. It takes a special
willful ignorance to not acknowledge something that obvious
because you're scared of being called racist, which
is actually insane to think about.
You're you're shying away from calling the most
obvious racist thing racist because they're gonna call
you racist.
I guess you could even call it Will
Crafted, but it's pretty insane.
So Gen X Girl points out Randy Fine,
the Hebrew hammer
is what they call
him. In Trump's endorsement of Randy Fine, he
listed graduating from Harvard as one of his
fine one of Fine's accomplishments. Well, guess what?
This is an article from the Harvard Crimson
about Randy Fine while at Harvard where he
paid
paid for votes and fraudulently took $24,000
in a grand.
But, you know, who cares? It's not about
that. It's about who leans into the Israeli
agenda, apparently, and nothing else seems to matter.
And if you just haven't seen by now,
it's no different than what Trump is doing.
It's un it's one of the most obvious
things in the conversation. So maybe maybe you
haven't heard him in a while. Seems like
an important time to reiterate the obvious. I
know people on the regular in the show,
you already know this stuff. But maybe you've
tuned in and out with how much has
evolved and where we are with all of
this. Maybe it's worth listening to what Trump
said about congress again. You know, the biggest
change I've seen in congress is Israel
literally owned congress. You understand that ten years
ago, fifteen years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And I think you know exactly what
I what I'm saying.
They had such power. Israel had such power
and rightfully
over congress.
Pretty clear
And rightfully over congress. You just can't misunderstand
that, guys. And you feel free to watch
the entire clip for yourself. It's obvious.
Now on top of that, especially with the
same conversation,
let's go back to the one where he
said he removed the Jew haters from this
country.
Obvious what's happening, guys. That is a violation
of your rights. Even if it's actually pea
Jewish people you hate. Not let not let
alone just being pro Palestine and then claiming
you hate Jewish people like they do every
day, everywhere in the conversation.
But nonetheless, whichever side you're on, you still
have the right to feel and think what
you want. And he was already telling you,
and we were screaming about it before the
selection. Pay attention. This is coming, and here
we are.
We will remove the jihadist sympathizers
and Jew haters. We're gonna remove the Jew
haters
who do nothing to help our country. They
only wanna destroy our
God.
What's sad is the people they're calling you
haters in most context are the ones fighting
for this country more than anybody, whether they
realize it or not. Fighting for constitutional
rights. Fighting against a group who's actively undermining
them for a foreign government. And he's telling
you those are the ones that are fought.
Hate our country. They're the ones acting within
the I mean, you get it. It's insane,
guys. It's obvious. It is schizophrenic.
But there's a tons of those clips. This
is just the ones that I highlighted.
Now to overlap with two more points, a
few things from Israel itself,
just to keep you updated about what's going
on, think about the comparison to what we're
dealing with or the places like El Salvador.
Here's an example. You already saw this, March
29. Inside Israel's torture jails where Palestinians are
held without charge, tell of brutal treatment. Gee.
Doesn't that sound like what we're talking about
in El Salvador? Gee. Isn't it interesting that
Bukele is also a Zionist? Gee. Isn't it
interesting that Israel is being supported by The
United States who sent them to another prison?
It's not interesting, guys. It's connection. It's obvious
what's happening.
Pay attention because this is coming, and we
need to do something about it.
As you've already heard,
Israel killed 15 Palestinian paramedics and rescue workers
one by one, says the United Nations. They
murdered them in a in a in a
in ambulances. They buried them to try to
hide it, then they killed the people that
came to try to find out.
All very publicly. This has been I I
reported this a couple of shows ago.
Dan Sheehan says, what will it take?
I mean, it's a legitimate question at this
point, guys. That's the Guardian. Not that that
means we can prove it. The point is
it's it's everywhere. The world
is being introduced to this in ways that
can't be ignored.
They're straight up assassinating
medical workers, Red Cross, Doctors Without Borders,
food kit central kitchen. I mean, right on
the surface,
bombing an entire flower truck. I mean, the
flower massacre.
But every time they've got a narrative and
every time these sycophants who are being controlled
just tow the line and their pop their
party circle do the same whether left or
right. Because guess what? They did the same
thing during Biden's administration when they towed the
line. Now the right is doing the same
thing. You're all on the same side. You
can't even see it.
Ollie or Ollie Goldberg says, can't get over
the idea of killing 15 paramedics in Rafa,
attempting to bury them in their ambulance, claiming
they were terrorists, sounds familiar, and then shooting
to kill the rescue team sent in to
find their missing friends.
Not surprised, just stuck. Can't seem to move
on from here.
And then go also or he also says
every day every day, there's a bottom below
rock bottom for Israelis.
The images of IDF snipers killing UN Red
Cross workers, rescue workers attempting to find the
bodies of the previous team killed by Israeli
troops. These images escape articulation.
Language and humanity disintegrate.
And Israel exposed says mass graves of medics
executed one by one.
Footage has surfaced of the execution of burial
site of 15 Red Crescent and civil defense
workers in Rafa.
On March 24, IDF surrounded the five ambulances
and their crew members handcuffed them, executed them,
buried them in mass graves, and destroyed the
vehicles, and then killed the people trying to
rest trying to find out what happened.
Guys, it's stuff like this that kills me.
You you have documented evidence from international workers.
You've got video of them digging up their
dead bodies. You have video I mean, guys,
it's just it's they don't care. I don't
know what more we need to see to
recognize that the leaders of the Western world
are not what they I mean, you they're
controlled.
But the very least that they're not what
they pretend they are. If we can't understand
what we're looking at here, the amount of
evidence, the amount of research, the ongoing I
mean, this is just one example of endless
examples that are caught.
Here here's another crazy overlap that you already
know about. Guess what? Herets, 03/30/2025.
This is their headline or rather their subtitle.
In Gaza, human shields are used by Israeli
soldiers
at least six times a day.
I served in Gaza for nine months as
an IDF member and came across these procedures
in December
2023,
writes an anonymous senior official
in one of the brigades.
In Gaza, human shields are used by Israeli
soldiers at least six times a day for
a year, if not seventy six years, which
is what the reality is.
Do
you see why they start leveling these accusations
without anything and they get picked up by
the media and the western leaders because they
get ahead of the narrative? Sort of how
Donald Trump grabbed the microphone before the COVID
thing and said, dude, China did it. Wuhan.
And we spun out from there. Not even
to say that some of that's not overlapping
with the larger picture. It was about getting
you in a clear direction for the narrative
well before anything was verified, knowing that The
US was involved with whatever was going on.
Every single time.
But let's keep pretending like it's only bad
guy Hamas. And even if you wanna pretend
Hamas is everything they claimed it was, you
can't their evidence isn't there.
What you keep seeing is what they're saying
here. Six times a day, they're using human
shields in Gaza. They you won't we've only
caught, what, 10 of them? But that 10
of them is not enough. Apparently, it was
all misunderstood.
And I'll include the show, the open secret
of Israel's use of human shields back in
11/09/2023.
Support TLAB, and you're ahead of the story,
guys.
Well, to end on the point of Iran
that overlaps with Israel, Pepe Escobar says this.
And if you haven't seen this, I needed
to include this just so you know what's
going on. This deserves its own segment.
He says it's getting completely out of hand.
If if Trump can't make a deal with
Russia, he'll put, quote, secondary tariffs on all
oil coming out of Russia. That's, I mean,
that's war. You're gonna create a economic war
that will quickly lead to a hot war.
Probably by design, if Iran doesn't agree to
his new nuclear deal, and he has been
this is a real thing.
He said it will be bombing the likes
of which they have never seen. So if
they don't do agree to a deal with
the guy who previously unilaterally broke the deal
that they've really continued to maintain,
and they've already said just, you know, basically
piss off. We're not gonna listen to you.
Go do your own thing.
He says they'll bomb them. So a country
who you're accusing of seeking nuclear weapons,
who by the way, your own state department
says they're not. The IE the International Atomic
Energy Agency says they're not. And who knows?
Maybe they are. The point is so every
country in the world clearly has the right
to do these things.
You're gonna bomb them?
So world war, if you don't do what
we demand, even though we're the ones that
screwed you last time, I mean, this seems
like it's being manufactured. You know why? Because
Israel wanted this from this country for decades.
He says, what the hell is this, Pepe
Escobar? Is this a statement or a bloody
gangster? Well, we think we know is the
latter, guys. Whitney's books will tell you that.
Meanwhile, his bombing of Yemen continues.
Yeah.
Doctor Simon Godex says, let me get this
straight.
Trump is threatening Iran over hypothetical nukes. Right?
Well, Israel already has nuclear weapons and is
openly committing genocide in Gaza. Wanna work that
one out for me? He says, where's that
president of peace energy now that never existed?
Who owns Trump? Because it sure as hell
isn't the American people.
Mel makes an excellent point.
Israel's Israelis be like, Hamas is a death
cult, and then have a plan to blow
up the whole world if they don't get
their way. Now this is an a book
from Seymour Hersh, one of the most well
respected journalist independent today, especially out out there.
And the book is entitled the Samson Option.
If you don't understand this, it is a
provable reality. It's their doctrine that should they
be feel that if they recognize Israel's about
to be lost, they will launch nuclear weapons
at everybody.
You now you're starting to wonder why maybe
they're maybe maybe there's blackmail for sexual reasons
or maybe it's because these people know that
if they don't let them get their way,
they're gonna nuke the world. I mean, certainly
possible.
All of this is real. This is what
is holding the world hostage right now.
And I'll include this for you. It's a
fifteen minute clip. It's worth watching from Propaganda
Co saying the war isn't coming. It's already
here. Leaked documents obtained by Ken Klippenstein from
Pentagon contractors expose the full scope of Trump's
secret war plan for Iran.
Guys, you gotta start calling this out. K?
This is coming. It's already being outlined, and
it's not for American interests.
Oliver Stone
citing this guy basically breaking down a pretty
long post, but basically saying, you know, conservatives
are starting to call out some problems, which
by the way, I've been saying that from
the beginning.
He's saying many Trump loyalists and many non
aligned people who'd be out been optimistic are
beginning to acknowledge a growing disappointment.
Also important to be honest about that because
it's pretty obvious right now. Outside of the
inner circle that only scream, yay, we're saving
the world no matter
excuse me. No matter what happens, which you
know who we're talking about. Outside of that,
it seems pretty common right now that people
are going this something's wrong
because it is wrong. Find the courage to
be honest about that.
And that doesn't mean you're siding with anybody
else. You're siding with honest people who care
about the facts.
That's the majority of the conversation right now.
Pull away from the partisan game, and you'll
realize how how inconsequential
it is in the real conversation.
And I don't mean that in the sense
of who's influent. They're clearly the point is
that
to recognize the real conversation of people who
are there, they're just not the ones in
power.
But my point is about how, you know,
that that's happening. And Oliver Stone says, what
the hell is going on? Trump has turned
into Biden,
Mercilessly relentlessly bombing Yemen and aggressively seeking a
new war with Iran? Well, the point is,
yes, that's always been the case. Why you
people, like, even Oliver Stone didn't recognize that?
I don't know.
Because we were this is what we were
screaming about before the selection, and we were
called black pill mercilessly.
And now every single thing we're warning about
is literally beginning to happen.
It's I it's not trying to say I
told you so. It's it's just it is
the reality.
And so people like this are starting to
go, what? How I can't believe it. It's
like, guys, what are you talking about? If
you've been paying attention,
you recognize the outcome, the action. The reality's
always been there. They just scream different things.
If we were able to deduce this was
already gonna happen because of just simply looking
at past actions, so could have everybody else.
But it says, why doesn't Trump at least
meet with the Iranian leaders? Because he has
no interest in doing so. It's about the
outcome Israel wants. And he goes, as he
did with North Korea.
What's a good point though? Right? Because he
did with North Korea.
They all and they cure criticize him. Why
wouldn't he do it with Iran? He did
it with Russia. I think you know why.
He goes, why doesn't he educate himself a
little and learn about the Yemeni and Iranian
cultures? Because they have no interest in doing
so.
He says, always remember,
the Parthian, was it the Parthians never gave
into Rome. The peace president,
we didn't vote for this.
So same point. Same point here too. I'll
I'll I'll end with this.
Liam McCollum interviewing,
Dave Smith,
who, by the way, I've reached out to
more than once. I I would be interested
to have a conversation with him. I get
the sense he just isn't some reason TLAB
is not allowed. But he says, if Donald
Trump actually does launch a word run, not
only will I not support it, I will
apologize for the rest of my life for
voting for the guy.
I'm I'm really happy to see that because
he has a lot of sway with people
in this conversation. Because I look in in
the larger partisan conversation, which I still do
still feel like he's a part of,
he he it's he has more integrity in
my opinion than most people in the conversation
for many reasons. He's pulled back and forth
based on things that I think, you know,
are facts.
Or here's the opinion and something shifts and
he goes, okay. Well, that's different now. If
being able to evolve your opinion based on
new information is a bare minimum for me
in regard to respect in this field.
And so what's important is I'm really glad
that's happening. It will change people's minds. But
my point is the same.
I mean, it's I feel like this is
like a one plus one equals two. How
we could have not already seen based on
previous rhetoric, based on his own I mean,
everything in the conversation showed you this was
coming.
So and again, and we were all yelling
that beforehand, and people like this were calling
us black. You know? It's interesting. So I
just think it's worth as it behooves you
to stand back and think about this.
Partisanship has pretty clearly in this very short
time frame misled a lot of people who
might otherwise be honest.
Just recognize that and start applying that wherewithal
the logic to what happens going forward.
I think that's important.
But I do think that people like him
saying things like Like, they'll probably share Oops.
Sorry. I'm playing that on the way out.
I think people like this saying things like
this, especially people like him, is gonna change
the conversation.
Now the question beyond that is, how do
we roll that into actual change? Now that's
the conversation I keep butting up against.
Interestingly, we had a great conversation today about
that, on a wake up about violent reaction,
you know, whether that's necessary. And I you
know my stance on that. There's there is
situations where that is something that eve that
even I would do. Defending my family, for
example, %.
As always, though, I don't think that's where
we should be leaning into, and I think
that's not the answer. Even if even when
necessary, I do think it leads to pot
negative outcomes. The bottom line is that we
need to start thinking about how we make
this reality happen without
the the the classic idea of violent regime
change, even with good intentions. Because even that,
especially today, will get co opted. It I
there's no way around it. You're gonna have
the same people with the same elements and
the same political entities that just lean in
and manipulate certain elements of it, and we
will end up right back in the same
place. Now to be clear,
there's no way to say, like I said,
that there's not a circumstance where that becomes
inevitable like they were saying today on the
show. The same old saying. Right? If you
make peaceful revolution
impossible, you make violent revolution inevitable or peaceful
resistance or whatever the claim is. That seems
what they're doing. But I will never that
is a line I will always stand by
because I think it's important.
But man,
today,
it is a time to make choices.
I've never been in I mean, I've I've
really done this for, I don't know, what,
a decade plus.
But the truth is that I've I've never
seen something that has alarmed me to the
point to where I see real possible outcome.
I mean, I've heard a lot of narratives
and hype and, you know, floated ideas, but
we're seeing things that are superseding even the
legislative process.
Just like declaring things and then just going
after it. Now if we see enough pushback
to where, you know, maybe the judge's rulings
or people in his own position, his own
party start changing things and it gets pulled
back, I'll at least feel a little better
because that's usually what happens. The the public
screams and they okay. We'll have to wait
a minute. Right? We'll come back to it
when they're not paying attention.
But I'm not seeing that right now. So
I just I think more than ever, we
need people in the partisan field that are
honest, which I think is the majority, just
to start calling these things out. And, you
know, make it clear. I still support Trump,
if that's what you think. I still believe
in Republicans, if that's what you believe.
Doesn't change the fact that you can still
stand up and say that is a problem.
That's not what I voted for. That's unconstitutional.
And I still vote for Trump. You know,
whatever it is, You gotta start calling out
these basic facts because they're using it. And
you know what? Here's an even better point
to end on. It's always possible, maybe, that
makes it easier for you that Trump and
the rest, maybe they don't know they're being
played. I don't agree with that.
But recognize that maybe they need you to
step up and say, hey, that's wrong. That's
not what we believe. Here's why.
You know, again, I think it's fruitless, but
whatever it is, you need to recognize I
think we all need to recognize that now
is the time to make those choices. So
thank you for tuning in, guys. Now, again,
on the end, I recommend oh, here. Let
me just include this. I have this on
the,
the show notes.
But the, the third eye carnival,
for those that are considering this, it should
be pretty damn cool.
Here.
Third eye carnival, the link is included.
I believe it's ninety days or $90 for
all three days.
It's gonna be pretty fun.
First day being sort of a birthday bash,
The next day being, I believe, most of
the performances and music, and it it's gonna
be pretty cool. All day event for all
three days. I'll be there most of the
time, I think.
And really just come out to support Steve
because he's the one pretty much putting this
on. And there's, you know, it's
the point is this is for us, for
the people. And, you know, and and bottom
line is just like I think in the
past, it's not even certain when he put
this on that he was even gonna make
any money off it. It's just about doing
this. So help him help him benefit from
the doing what I think is important anyway.
But that's where I'll be. And like I
said, I'm gonna be trying to do work,
like my show,
as much as often as as usual and
then trying to do some of the in
the RV recordings that I might do some
live, might record some. You'll see you'll be
seeing as it comes out over the next
week. But it'll be cool because there's a
lot of lot of people there. I I
already I've discussed with Charlie Robinson to do
sort of an in the T Lab RV
on the road kind of interview. Pasta and
Steve and I are probably gonna do something
in there. But I'm just gonna be, hey.
Let's jump in there and do a quick
little conversation. You know, maybe I'll put it
out as one thing. I'm not sure. Maybe
the easiest way to do it is probably
just putting it on my substack. That way,
it's just not gonna be giving everybody notifications
every time. But just tune in. Hope to
see you there. And, I'll probably be seeing
you tomorrow. I imagine that my plan is
to get some content out tomorrow as well.
The third, I'll probably hang out with Steve
for the most part. Maybe we'll see something
on that day as well. And then the
fourth, that'll be starting Carnival. So thank you
all for tuning in. Thank you for the
early birthday wishes in the chat.
Really just, you know, as always, guys,
I'm I'm I can't I can't ever express
how honored I am to have the kind
of people we have in this community.
And just the the, you know, it how
proud it makes me that that I see
everyday people who are just in this chat
who are just going like, man, this is
what it's this is what it's about. You
know, the the open minded conversation,
amicable converse you know, it's it's powerful. And
you guys are what make this community. So
thank you for being a part of this.
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
If he launches a war in Iran. And
then I saw one guy underneath that said
it goes, I know Dave Smith sure will.
And okay. It's just, like, a comment on
Twitter, but I was just, like, blown away.
And I'm not blown away by much. But
I was like, does any anybody actually thinks
I would
just because I'm like, well, I did support
this guy. So I'll rationalize and and, like,
defend getting in another war in The Middle
East? Is that
but but just for anyone who may have
that I I will say this. If Donald
Trump
actually does
launch a war in a round,
not only will I not support
it, I I will apologize for the rest
of my life for voting for the guy.
That that undoes any positive that might have
come out of this. So just to be
clear on that, it's it would be the
most disastrous policy and I just can't even
believe I mean, maybe like I didn't even
mean it. But I can't believe anyone would
think like,
you know, that somehow we're
we're now in the business of just sucking
up to Donald Trump. Fuck that. I was
a I was a sharpest goddamn critic in
his first four years. I was a pretty
sharp critic for the next four years after
that. And I supported him this time because
it just seemed like in the moment, we
had two options and one was clearly preferable.
But I have no loyalty toward Trump or
anyone in his cabinet or
or anything about the administration. I'm I have
loyalty to my principles and my country and
my family,
but none of that leads towards supporting a
war in Iran.
Okay. Go ahead, Rob. Anything you wanna weigh
at?