Zionism
is racism.
Israel cannot be both. Israel is either
a racist Jewish state or it's a democratic
state for everybody, and that's what I would
like Israel to be. I'd like
a democratic solution, one state with equal rights
for,
all its inhabitants.
Your organization,
Human Rights Watch, issued
a report last year,
about
Israel. Mhmm. And the conclusion was it is
an apartheid state.
And and there are four major
human rights groups in the last two years
who issued similar report,
which the same conclusion,
Israel is an apartheid state. So
apartheid
is racism.
Apartheid
is discrimination.
But
Israel is the only member
of the United Nations that I know
which is officially racist.
And I say this because of the,
July
2018
nation state law, which says
the Jews
have a unique
unique right to serve the termination
in Israel.
Unique means exclusive. Yes. It means Arabs have
no right to serve the termination. Mhmm. It
means even if Arabs became a majority Mhmm.
They would still have no right to serve
the termination.
So most certainly, Zionism
is a,
is a racist ideology,
and it is largely responsible
for the Anakba
that has unfolded throughout the last century and
continues today.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last twenty four hours.
Saturday, March twenty ninth twenty twenty five. Thank
you for joining me today. Definitely an interesting
development in regard to the JFK or excuse
me, RFK Junior
blackmail conversation that seems to be overtaking the
Internet today.
Definitely something I mean, there's just about a
endless amount of directions that we could take
this conversation. I mean, one of the obvious
points is how about we discuss the many,
many, many people that were conversing about this
before and being pushed back on before the
selection process.
But let's also go into this today and
discuss the evidence that's there or lack thereof
around this conversation,
make sure we're fleshing out what's really going
on around it. It's very interesting.
But I think it's important
even if it turns out, like, we'll get
into it today. It's an important conversation
because
it's to me, well, just to give you
one personal note before we dive into it,
and I was right go you know, after
I go over some things to start,
is it's interesting that right now, what we
all know like, there's there's a lot being
debated, a lot disputed, people pushing back on
certain ideological,
political sides and around Israel in particular.
But what everyone is everyone's aware, there's an
ongoing war. Clearly, it's a genocide. The the
ins I mean, the amount of people,
the amount of evidence, the everything around this
conversation is it's in it's infuriating, which come
jumps to my mind, but it's it's it's
I'm I'm trying to think of a word
that's not juvenile. It's just ridiculous that we're
having to debate something that is so tangibly
everything about it, every metric, every group. And
we've been over this so many times. I
don't even wanna go into it again. It's
obviously a genocide by every single metric and
every group that has standing, but what's frustrating
about it is that we have to still
debate that. My point though is that that's
one of the most obvious parts of this.
People dispute genocide war crime. Let's call it
war crimes. I don't think anyone in the
conversation is disputing war crimes other than blinds
eye and its supporters.
What's interesting to me is that because that's
such an obvious conversation,
then what has come from that
is in a conversation that I never would
have expected to see is the obvious open
to I mean, to being debated, but open
at the center of the conversation
of whether Israel is influencing controlling US policy,
which is still desperately flailing trying to be
called racist. Even though we're talking about a
government and influencing policy, anybody honest is going,
you know, I guess it's possibly rooted in
some kind of racism, or do you have
evidence of that claim? It's it's gotten so
cartoonish.
Now the point is I think it's interesting
as this starts to spin out around people
that are, you know, like,
in a way trying to make sense of
why
that's what we're seeing without
really identifying or highlighting that that's why we're
having this conversation.
Maybe it is a deflection. Maybe it's meant
to say, look over here, but is it
really over here? It's right in the center
of the conversation. So it's like, look at
this, but not the whole thing. Just this
one tiny part of your anyway, we'll go
into all of it and how important it
is regardless of where you lay the facts
in this conversation. But I think it's interesting
to see sort of this implosion of the
conversation, which we keep seeing within the conservative
right side of the conversation, which I think
speaks a lot to a lot around this.
Well, we're gonna get into some information around
USAID, again, that I think is just kind
of relevant to the ongoing manipulations.
I wanna make sure we talk about some
health relate and overlaps, one about the EPA,
but a few different points that I think
are relevant around Maha that then kind of
overlaps with the RFK Jr conversation.
But bigger today, the main thing I wanna
kind of the main thrust is to talk
about Zionism again
and how it relates to the different points
we're seeing today politically,
foreign policy, but in kind of like the
realm of the RFK Jr US political field
overlap of the conversation.
And, you know, many other things we're gonna
get into as it relates to that. I'm
gonna give you some updates on what's going
on in the ground in Gaza and a
couple of different examples therein. But I think
it's important that we highlight this from an
American perspective. And, you know, you know my
opinion on this, guys. I I frankly, I
think it's insane that we even have to
argue that it's not clear,
you know, that instead of the conversation being
to what degree is Israel influencing if not
controlling US policy, that we have to even
have that conversation is it's just strange.
It this is not the evidence is there,
guys. The amount of funding, the amount of
obvious infiltration that they'll proudly support. I mean,
it's just it's an insane con I think
that in and of itself shows you how
much the control exists, but that's that's a
fallacy
in regard to that should not be the
one thing you point you to go that
proves it. Right? The the that is what
a kind of a fallacy in and of
itself to point to something like that to
prove the point, but it still is evidence.
You can clearly see that that is happening.
It's obvious to what degree,
I mean, Zionist being in Trump's cabinet, for
example. I mean, it's it's or the amount
of overwhelming kind of, like,
personal
from you know, that they believe deeply in
the biblical right, for example, of Israel to
take what they want. It it is
impossible
to miss. And I think that's why this
conversation is coming out. But I wanna start
with
a quick point that I put out, before
I went live just so you got in
case you guys missed it in regard to
a little DDoS attack that TLAB suffered today,
and our background team kind of, you know,
did their job. But it's just interesting to
see how much of this continues to happen,
and I just think it's worth pointing out.
But the only reason to bring it up
because it was a brief thing, which in
case you guys were curious and hadn't seen
me follow-up, I did post below. Oh, this
is somebody else. I posted below just simply
saying that they appeared to have dealt with
it. We're back on track.
But this this is somebody just adding to
this saying, one time he tried to DM
me that the one time he tried to
DM me about something in regard to that,
this is what happens. And I I don't
know how I see this so often. People
simply try to send me direct message and
their account get locked for twenty four hours.
What how is that not basically training people
to avoid sending me content, which seems to
be ongoing con example, but just a side
point to get started. But I wanna start
with USAD USAID right out of the gate.
Oh, did I
for the podcast.
Amazingly, even though I read this four times
over, apparently, it says USIAD,
but, you know, interesting how that works out.
But it says,
this is a post that came out today.
Weirdly enough, I agree, actually, with no real
comment on how obviously this weird
this door with the lock seems to look
like a a
a male figure, which is kinda funny to
me. That's such an obvious thing in the
conversation. Everyone's commenting on the chat.
But, Alec Jones Alec Jones comes out and
says, Trump strikes again. State department says it's
officially shutting down USAID.
Now I I think it's important just for
a broader sense of this before we get
into what really is going on, just to
highlight the whether Kim or whoever whoever else
is out there making this conversation.
Wait. What do you mean you say strikes
again? What does that mean? Has it ever
been shut down? No. No. Up to this
very point, they all said that. This is
why it's again in my title today, and
it didn't. It very rapidly became, it's all
done. It shut down. And they were all
and then it became, oh, well, now Rubio's
taking it this, and we're gonna be
redirecting the the the funds this way. And,
you know, oh, so not getting shuttered. Okay.
But still being diminished. Okay. But fine. You
coulda said that first, but it was shut
down first. That's they all reported it that
way, and then it turned out that it
was really kind of being redirected.
You know, some things were stopped. That's clear.
But nobody seems to fully be able to
verify to what degree. So all these people
screaming about how they they stopped 80% of
x, y, and z. Oh, did they? Did
did they send you the documents? Did you
verify that? The reality is pretty clearly a
lot of what they said was shut down
was simply redirected elsewhere. I have personally shown
some examples of this. I would never claim
to know what percentage of what has been
officially stopped.
Even then, as we'll get into, that's a
it's a fallacy seeing as how if we're
simply as he tells you as it really
has always been, nudge, nudge, just the reality
of it under the state department now.
The point is that that then becomes irrelevant.
Right? If all you're doing is pulling this
entity into the state department and claiming, we
stopped all of this, well, now the budget
is basically the state department budget. And so
now we don't even get to know what
becomes is
state department versus USAID or it's all just
big one thing. Right? So
let's just say they go 80% is now
stopped. Well, what happens if they roll it
under the state department and they continue all
those things and how it's all up in
the air is my point. We'll come back
into that that main point in regard to
where the funding is actually going. But saying
he strikes again
is in and of itself kind of insulting
seeing as how nothing actually
strikes again would mean he shut it down
for a second time, and that's not what
happened. But then it says state department says
it's officially shutting down USAID.
Well, I'll read to you what they said.
That's not what they said. And it's very
frustrating that we have to constantly batter back
these hyperbolic,
fact free claims from people in the mainstream
alternative media.
And so there goes the deep state favorite
piggy bank. Yeah. Well, that's that's not inaccurate.
But if you're gonna make it the deep
state's piggy bank, then explain to me why
Donald Trump's administration used it aggressively throughout his
last administration. And they're still using it right
now. Does that not matter? I kept I
just showed you five different
contracts from The USA spending using USAID,
some of which were climate change related, some
of which were male circumcisions in one was
actually in Mozambique overlap. One was in South
Africa. One was
funny how that only matters when it's a
buzzword comfort point about something else. But that's
all that's that's not to make it left
or right. They all do it. So if
it's a deep state thing, then they're all
deep state. Right? But that's the kind of
faulty logic you're getting or the lack of
it on one side of it from the
corporate
works exactly corporate mainstream alternative media.
But I simply said wrong or dishonest yet
again. It is just more shell game, and
I'll show you exactly what I'm pulling this
from. They are not shutting down USAID.
They're simply repurposing it and moving it under
the state department.
Dot dot.
Somebody missed this in the conversation online today.
So in other words, admitting what it has
always been.
Obviously, that means that it was already under
the state department, which I clearly know, which
we've already said many times. But it says,
and effectively giving it a larger budget. Well,
if you understand what I mean by that,
if you're simply moving into the state department,
which again was really always what it was.
Okay? All they had was this supposed, quote,
independent
entity that was just run by the same
thing. Okay?
But
now as you fold it into the state
department, the budgets are now one and the
same. You it just becomes officially, is the
way to say that, part of the state
department. It was already, but it wasn't official.
But now all you do is you lose
the differentiation
between the two. Oh, sure. They'll give you
some kind of a breakdown for what they
claim is going into the state department version
of whatever it becomes now,
but
we don't get to fully it's it's like
black budget stuff, guys. We won't really know.
That's not to say that I know it's
not, but I don't know it is. Vice
but it's either way. But here's what it
says in the actual breakdown.
This is from Reuters.
USAID told staff all jobs not required by
law to be eliminated. Now look, I'm not
claiming in any sense that they are not
at least feigning or in some ways actually
diminishing what the front facing part of the
independent USAID is. But if we already know
it's the state department and always has been
and is now being folded into it, whatever
they do to this open faced entity supposedly
still independent is meaningless at this point. If
you understand what I'm trying to highlight here.
But just to be clear, there are things
being moved, and, yes, some things are being
cut. Even with, like, even with the we
made the point about Doge's larger receipts,
I guess, web page. It's clear that there
are things that have been stopped. I don't
think anyone is honestly claiming that literally nothing
has been stopped. It's about the real picture.
Seeing as how we've already shown over the
first couple of months, they've actually increased spending
as a total, it's clear that we're being
played right now. Maybe it changes in a
week or a month, but at the moment,
we are not. There's no promises kept in
that in that picture. This says personal personnel
of The U of USAID were told on
Friday that all positions
there, not required by law, would be eliminated
after the state department notified congress it would
discontinue USAID functions
that do not align with Trump administration priorities.
This is new. This is from yesterday.
Now it says USAID staff were informed of
the decision by an internal memo. That's what
everyone's pointing to from Jeffrey Lewin,
a member of the billionaire of a member
of billionaire Elon Musk's job slashing Doge Efficiency
Group who have been acting as the the
deputy administrator of the agency.
Now remember, Jeffrey Levin Jeremy Levin, excuse me,
is a Lewin, excuse me, mixing these names
up. The the bottom line is, guys, that
these clearly,
that is not in any way shutting something
down. If it's still working and there are
still people working there and there's still some
budget, yes, you could say diminishing it, but
then that that's gonna come to my point
about whether the state department just absorbs whatever
else is going on there, and they could
move that however they like.
Does this appear to be shutting down to
you? Sec certainly not again, seeing as how
it hasn't happened once.
But we'll just go to the other article
too. This is from ABC where it says
a state department the state department said Friday
was officially shuttering USAID. Well, that they did
say that. But what's funny is they're not
actually doing that. Shuttering means discontinuing, shutting down,
stopping. Even this article and the memo that
they put out makes it clear that's not
what's happening. I mean, is it am I
am I losing my mind that these things
actually matter that the small you can't say
it shut down when it's actually it's like
Trump saying he's defeated ISIS a %. How
can we pretend like that's not the dumbest
thing in the world when they also
later point to ISIS and things happening other
places?
And you push them, they go, well, he
he means diminished it to the point where
they're not real. Okay. Then don't say a
%. Simple. I never argued there wasn't action
taken. I don't know why that's not important
to people. Or are we just in a
place where the,
I guess, the majority of the partisanship is
willing to just pretend like facts don't matter
in their own interest, which I kinda think
is what we know is happening? I still
argue that's not the majority of people.
It says in what could deal a final
blow to the beleaguered foreign aid policy? I
think the interest is convincing people that there
is something shifting from both sides of your
false paradigm. It says, in a memo distributed
Friday to USAID employees and obtained by ABC
News and and everyone else, I mean, it's
a memo that's being circulating, the agency's new
deputy director and a former Department of Government
efficiency official wrote that the state department, quote,
intends to assume responsibility
for many of USAID's functions than its ongoing
programming. But, again,
anybody understanding the previous situation and not just
waking up into Trump's narratives are aware that's
already the reality. It was basically a regime
change engine that had been used through the
guise of helping people, and that doesn't mean
they didn't, in some cases, help people.
The bottom line is if you're simply resuming
those responsibilities,
the game that's being played here is, yes,
we're shutting down what we call USAID
over here and the independent idea of it,
but the functions and, in fact, the very
same thing will continue
right over here.
So we could play the semantics game and
say, yes. It's shut down entirely even though
it's gonna continue.
Seems that's dumb to say. Right? We could
be honest and say we are simply repurposing
it under the state department, which it already
was doing a long time ago, and maybe
slashing the budget in some way. We'll never
know that until we actually get there and
look back and say, here's what happened. But
that's the point as always. Everyone who wants
to lean into this like Jones is gonna
say, we did it. It's over. We won.
Everybody look the other way, which is kinda
what he does right now.
It says the State Department, quote, will seek
to retire USAID's
independent
operation
immediately
and assess
whether to rehire some unknown numbers of officials
to, quote, assume the responsibility
administration
responsible administration
of USAID's
remaining life saving and strategic aid programming.
Okay.
Not to beleaguer the point or belabor the
point here, guys.
If you're rehiring people and and resuming
certain programs, I'm gonna go ahead and take
a shot in the dark and say it's
not done if it's doing things.
Obviously, you already know where this goes, guys.
That's the same point as before.
This transfer will significantly
enhance, it says, efficiency,
accountability,
uniformity,
and strategic impact
of something that doesn't exist? No. In delivering
foreign assistance programs. So it's still doing that.
Whether you wanna call it the State Department
or you wanna call it USAI something else,
the bottom line is that it's still doing
the things that we all talked about. It's
a shell game. That's what a shell game
looks like. Now look. Maybe they're doing it
for good reasons. Maybe this will be the
move it over here game before we finally
get rid of it later. Good. Maybe. I'm
not saying I have, of course, the ball.
The problem is that this is not what
they're presenting it to be. And if we
really stand back, of course, I'm being as
objective as possible,
but realize that we already see what their
objectives are. We already see how they're aiming
this in Iran and elsewhere and already using
it to repurpose Gaza, which is part of
what this will become as the least they
claim.
Then we already know it's not gonna go
the way they say it will, or at
least the indications, I should say, already present
the reality or the evidence to suggest that
it will not be something that just diminishes.
Rather, it will be used in its more
nefarious purpose, the only real purpose I think
it was there for, under the state department.
All my opinion, other than what we're proving
here, allowing our nation and president to speak
with one voice in foreign affairs. So in
other words, by the way, also consolidating
even from the illusion, by the way, but
consolidating more officially
the power under one element, the executive branch.
Quote, it will also obviate the need for
USAID to continue operating as an independent establishment.
That's all what they're highlighting right there. It's
an easy win to say, he shut it
down like he promised even though that's not
actually what's happening.
You know? And and, of course, simply having
an objective reality of this causes all the
morons on Twitter to freak out and scream
things at you, but that's the world we
live in today.
So here's the clip, by the way. This
and, well, here's the point. This is before.
This is from February 3. This was the
first time they claimed they shut it down.
Every go back and look at the time
frame. Libs, the TikTok, and the rest were
all cheering about the shutting down of USAID,
and it didn't. It got repurposed. Now they're
doing it again. It's the same dynamic. But
just to show you what he said then.
USAID another question.
Well, look. I mean, my frustration with USAID
goes back to my time in congress. It's
a completely unresponsive agency.
It's supposed to respond
to
policy directives of the state department,
and it refuses to do so. So
the function In other words, it's not doing
the things we want it to do. Not
that we wanna get rid of it because
it's a wasteful agency that is abusing people's
rights, but now we wanna use it in
that way how we wanna use it. So
we're gonna remove the woke edge to it
and simply apply a more authoritarian dynamic and
achieve the same thing or whatever you wanna
call it. That's the reality of this. And
you can already see it as I've already
shown you in contracts that are continuing and
new ones that are starting under this administration
for the same things. In some cases, even
the same woke cover, at least as I
see it, as a cover. Either way, also
doing HIV prevention in now in South Africa
and male circumcision in different parts of of,
Tanzania, for example. We just went over this.
Those things should matter to people who have
logical consistency. If you're outraged they're funding that
in Biden's administration, you should be even more
outraged that people pretending they don't want that
are doing so still.
Of USAID. There are lot of functions of
USAID that are going to continue. They're gonna
be part of American foreign policy, but it
has to be aligned with American foreign policy.
I said very clearly
when we when I during my confirmation hearing
that every dollar we spend in every program
we fund, that will be aligned with the
national interest of The United States. And,
USAID has a history of sort of ignoring
that and deciding that there's somehow a global
charity separate from the national interest. These are
taxpayer dollars.
And so
Yeah. You get the point. So we're gonna
do it the way we wanna do it.
That's all that's all you should take from
that because that's what's happening.
Now let's also not forget. I'm not gonna
play it. You can watch it. It's a
six minute video, seven minutes from breakthrough news.
But I said, so when Rubio uses USAID
to, quote, rebuild Gaza, which is what he
claimed already,
without the Palestinians, of course, will Republicans be
able to call out this obvious deception?
Israel wants to replace UNRWA with a CIA
front group. Israel's Foreign Ministry created task force
to replace UNRWA with USAID.
Now maybe that'll shift. Maybe because it gets
too much attention, they'll shift to something else.
Maybe national now is for democracy. Who knows?
The point is
this has already been in the works.
So if they're already floating this and now
they're gonna use the state department, I mean,
you can see how easily this would come
together. And because they simply shifted away the
USAID moniker, all the people gives the conservative
Republican crowd an easy way to go. No.
No. No. That's just the US government helping
build regatta. No. You're using USAID. You're just
not calling it that. See how easy this
is? How easy I I mean, in the
sense of just a it's it's like what
Vanessa and I have talked about, or rather
her work in particular, about how easy it
is for them just to change the name
of a group in Syria and pretend like
it's not the same stupid group they've been
funding for years. Oh, no. It's not Al
Nusra anymore. It's just Hajj al Sham now.
All Al Qaeda, but who cares? The same
group they're literally allowing to rape and murder
people in Syria and funding and supporting them
right now. That's the same game. It's they
know it works, apparently, at least on the
people they need it to work for.
Just on another interesting overlap to Doge I
thought was interesting, you know, funny in a
way.
I keep saying this, and I pointed it
out before. So Elon Musk, rather, Canoe the
great says Obama signs Doge style executive orders
to cut waste and burn efficiency.
Okay? And Elon Musk goes, should someone do
a who said it? Obama, Clinton, or Doge?
Literally impossible to tell the difference. I'm like,
I don't think like, the way I read
this, it's like they're trying to make the
point that, like, you guys are wrong about
what we're doing to the Democrats or whoever
they think they're aiming this at. Going, you
know, because they're going, you're not doing the
right thing. You're doing you're lying. Are you
cutting it the wrong way? Okay. He's trying
to go see, but Obama proposed the same
thing. It's like, okay. What's funny is the
people like us, which I think is the
majority, are like, yeah, you dummy. We we're
it's the government. We're we're we all so
all you're doing is going, see, we're doing
the thing you all think we're doing. Exactly.
Government manipulating us using policy.
But what's funny is the people on his
side
who are you know, I argue ostensibly on
his side, people that are the conservative Republican
crowd
are going, well, wait. We're we don't wanna
be like Obama. What you're he's using the
point to throw at them going, see? We're
not as bad as you think. But his
own but, like, I guess, to the detriment
of his own support base. Why would you
wanna argue that you're doing the same thing
as Obama? Doesn't that make my point that
you're all doing the same thing at a
different flavor?
Oops. I don't think they're really thinking that
through, but who knows? And I said I
just made the joke of it, and I
said, breaking. By the way, anytime you see
me write breaking, especially in all capitals, I
would I just feel I I don't think
I would that maybe there's a a certain
realm that I might use the word breaking
for certain context. But if you see me
write that, pretty much assume it's it's being
sarcastic.
Or especially if you got some red flashlights
on there. Red lights. I said breaking, Elon
admits DOGE is really just Obama style executive
orders, saying it's, quote, literally impossible to tell
the difference. Now you tell me how that's
not exactly what just happened there. I'm just
framing it with a different it's it's you
know, if you're gonna say that ours are
like Obama's, the same the reverse logic would
be Obama's is like ours. Right? So it's
just funny to me. All I'm trying to
highlight is that if you can't see that
this is the same game like, even going
back to Derek, what Derek just covered in
regard to the old efficiency movement
and how clearly this is just and Taylorism
and how this is just a new example
of an old
liberal progressive direction
for technocracy that they've just taken over under
a Republican mantle. It's the same game as
for anybody that I think is clearly the
majority of this country that are not really
taking to the partisanship, maybe lean one way
or the other, but see through most of
it. It just it's kind of comical. But,
see, I think just like Israel desperately trying
to reach just a small base of The
US,
you know,
enough percentage to pretend it's everybody, same thing
the partisanship does, guys. That's a desperate thing
that needs a certain percentage to pretend that
they have everyone's support. That's what I see
it as anyway. Jimmy, Jimmy Doerr makes a
great point. Again, we got the Doge point
in general about how I mean, we're supposed
to be fighting the deep state. Right? All
this big high minded talk in the beginning
about all these big things, and what they're
doing is going after the small guys. They're
going after small things and small groups and
small they're not going after the power structure.
They're going after things that the power structure
wants them to go after as I see
it. In this case, as he writes out,
this is what Dogue will never cut or
even mention. He says, if Elon Musk has
balls, this is what he'd be screaming about.
But it's all a show because we all
know the real waste, fraud, abuse is happening
inside the Pentagon, the war machine. Same thing
Catherine's been saying. You guys really think they're
ever gonna bring up the trillions of missing
dollars? You think they're really ever gonna go
after the real, the reality of what we
all understand is somewhat connected to the shadow
governed deep state apparatus? Because it's abstract. I
don't think anybody can pretend they know what
the real picture is there, other than people
somehow involved in it even then is probably
completely decentralized. The point is that that is
where we should be starting.
Getting rid of mRNA shots. How about just
the COVID shot? I'm gonna get into that
in a second in regard to the the
Maha misdirection around the RFK point. But there's
so many things that should be focused on.
Primarily, things like this. He said they'll never
cut any of the and I think it's
way more than this, by the way, 900
military bases The US has around the world.
No other country has this, not even close.
China has one military bay, and I would
argue too on that. I bet you there's
more than what we know about. But, realistically,
what we could verify, apparently, one or a
few bases outside the borders, Russia, about 20.
Elon is doing sleight of hand and so
is Trump. I agree with him entirely here.
They're actually increasing the Pentagon budget, which they
are, despite claiming the opposite. Trump acting like
he's being sarcastic to end wars quickly, sarcastic
to reduce spending. I just said those things.
Yeah. Just like we told you. He said
that, by the way. I'm sure most of
the people support him pretend like he didn't
or don't wanna see it for themselves, and
increased spending on war not cutting it. MAGA
has been betrayed and duped. Now I agree
with that. I really do. And I keep
making that point in the sense that I
think most people
on on really, on all sides of the
partisanship, the majority of their bases, they really
they want they want good for this country.
Let's not forget that. Let's not lose sight
of the reality that most people, the way
they trick everybody is because they trick them
into thinking they're doing the right thing. So
right there, it shows you that they know
most people or at least want, whether they
understand what that looks like or not, good
for this country. And they've convinced you that
they're the absolute
epitome of evil, so you stop looking at
the real manipulators in the situation.
Your fellow neighbor, whatever left to right or
or seeing through it all, mostly, I would
the the the bet would be majority of
them want good things for this country. That's
why they pretend to be good. And I'm
talking about however you see that. Doesn't mean
they would all agree on what that outcome
is. I think he they have been played
because they think they're getting the good things,
but they're not. Now,
in regard to the Maha overlap, which is
one of those points, guys, I mean, the
whole reason they leaned into all of that
is because they knew that a large portion
of them wanted this positive change in regard
to removing certain dangerous vaccines, if not all
of them, and going after certain groups like
the EPA or removing things. In some cases,
they've been inching towards some of these positive
things, but actually going after the larger problems.
I don't see really any of that happening.
I've seen some movement, and I'll point to
a couple of things. I mean, I'll pull
up I'll let you hear exactly what Alex
is referring to, all the different positives that
everyone's ignoring, and then we'll we'll point to
the reality of those things. Now I've been
clear on my opinion.
From day one, in regard to RFK Jr
and the coverage around Israel, right, from day
one, what did I say? In regard to
after he made his stance clear, I said
morally indefensible.
Never once have I I even faltered on
that because it's the it's the reality.
Saying that you can defend what's happening there
in the first week, let alone right now,
morally indefensible. Now
back to the point we're gonna get into.
I what I say from the beginning, it
doesn't make sense. Right? It doesn't line up.
Either he's being blackmailed, he's being threatened, or
he's been secretly lined with us the entire
time. Either way, just the consistency is impossible.
It doesn't it does not make sense. And
even if he was been lying has been
lying the whole time, even if you something
did shift, the point is still the same
as that his work around that before coming
into this administration
and hopefully some things after has been monumentally
positive, guys. You can't ignore that. You could
argue that he did it all to trick
you for now. That's certainly possible, but you
have to regard the the the work he's
done around injections or, you know, just health
in general. Going back a long way has
been powerful and good for this country, and
I think just people in general. But that's
that's that's my point has been. So how
do you explain
this anti war stance than pretending like genocide
is okay? It really makes people confused. And
when my
my gut has always told me that there
was some kind of a pressure point being
applied. But I could never prove that, and
still to this day, kind of jumping ahead
a slight bit, I still don't think we
can prove that. But
there's a lot of evidence, and that's what's
so frustrating for those of us that were
saying this before the selection process and going,
why would you pretend that's not there? And
most of the people who were telling us
we were blackpilled are the ones now breaking
the news about this kind of, I think,
little bit light on the fact story around
blackmail.
Nonetheless, I'm not even remotely saying I think
it's not the case. In fact, I would
if it was a betting man, I would
say that it's most likely the case, but
we'll go into that. So but I wanted
to talk about this around the Maha conversation
because it's so interesting how much is being
you know, there's a lot of sidestepping going
on, a lot of kind of look over
there, you know, like, as I call it,
dangling cat toy to, you know, jump at
this thing over here while this thing plays
out over there. Now one thing I think
is important to highlight in a broader sense
from this administration, and let's not forget that
all of these health directions, the EPA, the
FDA, the CDC, they're all
under
the auspices of RFK Jr and HHS.
That doesn't mean he can just snap his
fingers and make it immediately happen despite the
way people pretend they when, you know, their
people are in power.
There's always, you know, people like we're already
seeing, by the way, with the FDA point.
He made statements and he did he started
the momentum, but nothing has changed as of
yet. It's an ongoing thing. And that stuff
can take years, and it shouldn't.
My point, though, is that when you see
stuff like this, there's no way to disc
decouple this from Trump or RFK Junior, especially
since I haven't seen any of them speak
up and go, that can't be okay. So
this is Zeldin from the twenty seventh.
EPA offers industrial polluters a way to avoid
rules on mercury, arsenic, and other chemicals. Now
it's one of those I told you so
moments because when we all were screaming about
the reduce removing regulation,
everyone's trying to pretend that's gonna somehow benefit
the little guy. Right? It's gonna stop you
from having to put a rail in your
house. Yes. That's not how that's gonna work,
guys. If it's profitable for the system, those
things remain. What this is is about increasing
the
that I was gonna say profit for larger
companies. The point is about simply making these
things not applicable to big business,
which, by the way, Trump has been wildly
consistent ever since I've whether in politics or
not. He is a big business guy. Removing
things,
even though they're obviously in the right direction
because it helps people make money. And then
trying to argue that at the end of
the day, that's what's best for this country.
Guys, that's just not true, especially since it
almost never comes back to the little guy,
the average person, the middle class, whatever that
would be means today.
So this is, in my opinion, entirely bad.
There's no way around this. You guys tell
me what you think. Here's the
article. It says, as part of a push
to roll back dozens of environmental regulations, the
Trump administration is offering coal fired power plants
and other industrial polluters, you know, kinda like
the group that would like, the biolab company
that was polluting people in in North Care
in in Conyers, Georgia.
Right? That's exactly what we're talking about, guys.
A company that was allowed to continue to
do that for so long that it caused
so many dangerous fires, including the last one
that apparently had one of the, if not
the, one of the largest docs and releases
in American history
as according to Scott Smith and the rest
of the evidence that literally nobody wants to
talk about, apparently.
The point is that that's what we're talking
about is a company that's allowed to do
that because nobody I mean, remember we talked
about it when that got at at the
after the guy died who was trying to
give testimony about that right outside he left
the building? And there was conversation about a
a
a a lake in the area that was
bubbling out green water. Why did that never
get talked about? We're always just I mean,
the point is the reason that's allowed to
happen is because nobody isn't either enforcing or
there's no regulation stopping them from poisoning the
people in this town. Who knows why when
you dive into the bio lab company, there's
some pretty weird connections to people in high
places.
And no but still, I've as far as
they know, nothing's actually happened there.
So he says the Trump administration's offering coal
fired power plants and other industrial polluters a
chance for exemptions
from requirements to reduce emissions of toxic chemicals
such as mercury, arsenic, and benzene.
Now the effort here from partisan games I'm
already seeing is to connect this back to
some climate change hysteria. It's not what we're
talking about.
The redo the reduction of releasing of things
like mercury, arsenic, and benzene, benzene even which
overlaps with the conversation from dot East Palestine,
is important
because this is these are companies that are
doing their practices allow these dangerous things to
be released, and there are whether it's not
you I wouldn't call these Biden era things.
That's how they're trying to frame it. The
point is these have been long worked on
from people like RFK Jr to get them
to have to stop the practices that allow
these things to hurt their people that live
right around these buildings, if not the entire
state.
And what does that do? Well, of course,
it causes them to have to spend more
money to do it in a way that
does not allow that.
So if you can't make it a profitable
business, then don't do it.
I don't care what your product is. The
end of the day, the argument that we
need something so bad that people should be
harmed by it, that's the same thing to
do with these dangerous injections that they're still
allowing to roll out even though they promised
something would change. It's the same logic. Well,
we have to give them immunity or they
won't make injections anymore. Good. Then don't make
them. If you can't make a product that
need that key if you make a product
that has to be protected from liability because
it hurts so many people, maybe you shouldn't
make that product. Or maybe you should demand
they make it better
instead of giving them the ability to not
make it better because they, well, don't have
to.
It's the same stupid thing. Now this, the
Environmental Protection Agency has set up an electronic
mailbox
to allow regulated companies to request,
get this, a presidential exemption. So, basically, they
send an email to Donald Trump, and you
know how that goes. Under the Clean Air
Act to host
to it says to exemption under the Clean
Air Act to a host of Biden air
rules. Of course, the Clean Air Act, typical
how this stuff works. The Patriot Act that
has nothing patriotic about.
So this is basically an email chain. I
think they call it down here,
I'll come back to it. They had a
a name they called it, like a polluters
something. The bottom line is that you're able
to reach out to Donald Trump and say,
hey. I need an exemption for x, y,
and z.
I guarantee you all related to thing that
whether he likes the company, whether it's more
you know, something's pro what he likes, or
at the end of the day, simply something
that is gonna make more money.
It seems that none of the concern is
about whether these things will hurt people in
the area, which was the reason they were
there in the first place. It's not Biden
related. It's simply health related.
Companies were asked to send an email by
by Monday seeking permission from president Trump to
bypass new restrictions. The Clean Air Act enables
the president to temporarily
exempt
industrial
sites from new rules if the technology required
to meet them is not widely available. Oh,
yeah. It's tough for them. Sorry, guys. Tough.
So about that that's not our concern. Then
find a way to make the business work
in the new model or don't do it.
And it says if the continued activity is
in the interest of national security. Oh, and
there it is. That's an anything's catchall. So
if they claim what they are doing is
an interest of what they think is national
security and that, of course, because it's national
security, they're not in any under any obligation
to
break down why it meets that frame,
then good. Then do it. That's how this
is how the argument goes. And, of course,
all under what they call the Clean Air
Act. The act that allows them to then
not allow the clean air to or rather
not allow this to be
how do I even frame that? An act
that's not helping the air stay clean, which
is typically how that works. It says exemptions
would be allowed for nine EPA rules issued
by the Biden administration. Now, yes, that's my
point. It did come out under the Biden
administration. But let's realize that people like RFK
and others have been working at this no
matter what administration for a very long time.
Because the reality is, and I'm not saying
him in particular, but groups in that vein
because this is important to everybody. This is
not some kind of a side issue. It's
about companies doing things that this is like
pretending that Teflon,
when they found out that it was giving
pregnant woman cancer on the on the line,
that that wasn't a big deal because, well,
it makes more money. Well, yes, it was.
Everyone lost their minds and they should have
because it was they were killing people and
deforming children, and they knew what they were
doing. Or DuPont, or which is the same
story, or any number of examples.
This happens all the time.
Or Agent Orange or, you know, the things
where they find out later that they're problematic.
So now the problem is we know these
things are causing damage, and they're giving them
exempt exemptions for money.
Now it says that they were, the exemptions
were including limits on mercury,
ethylene oxide, which seems very relevant to over
I mean, that overlaps the COVID story. It
overlaps a lot of different things.
And other hazardous air pollutants. God, I've
I've shuttered and find out what that category
includes. How much how much you wanna bet?
Things like dioxins and PFAS. It says mercury
exposure can cause brain damage, especially in children.
Fetuses
are vulnerable to birth defects via exposure in
a mother's womb.
But it's okay, though, as long as you
got some national security justification,
whatever that means.
This, you know, this is a
smaller point in the scale of a of
a lot of what's going on, but it
just shows you the direction we're talking about.
This should not be okay with people saying
they wanna make America healthy again. This is
the this is make America less healthy for
the profit. That's what this is. It says,
quote, companies can now apply for a gold
plated get out of your permit free card.
So this is, one of the people reporting
on this thing, adding that the latest action
mark marked as
the latest action marked at least the third
time. The EPA has moved Zelda specifically has
moved to weaken enforcement of environmental laws since
he took office with, you know, nearly, less
than two months ago.
Yeah. Exactly. Consistently in the wrong direction.
Maha, you should call this out.
Now another health related notes, this brings us
into the RFK point. I just wanna point
a few things out. I just think it's
interesting the way that these kind of, you
know,
circle the wagons, extreme partisans do when there's
any kind of a thing here. This is
Walter Kurt saying, now that Candace Owens and
Ian Carroll are also attacking Maha movement, which
is just funny to frame it that way.
Two people that, by the way, have been
predominantly
supportive of that, and now that they call
something else out that it there's enough to
at least have a conversation about it. Is
it now attacking the Maha movement? It's like,
no. They're going after people who are potentially
compromised.
You can disagree with them.
The Maha movement is something they both clearly
support, but this is them trying to turn
the movement against them because they call out
the people that they're trying to protect. That's
what I see it as. But it says,
can we finally admit they're just fully opposed
to president Trump and his agenda? Which is
hilarious to me seeing as how a lot
of people in the independent media in the
middle, people on even people on left and
right seem to call out at least Ian
a lot as somebody who's going for that
blindly. So it's just kinda funny. This is
what partisanship becomes.
Per self serving
subjective assumption
at everything.
Right? If somebody goes against that, well, he's
probably completely blind, and everyone seems to be
calling Ian Carroll a completely compromised something from
all sides. And maybe they're all right. Maybe
one's right. Who knows? You can decide for
yourself. But I think it's interesting to keep
seeing that. Mike, I the more it continues,
the more I keep thinking he's just somebody
who just is kinda being used by a
lot of sides, and he's just going through
it like he thinks is important. If you
can decide for yourself, at the end of
the day, I think it's funny how all
sides kinda converge and circle the wagons. That's
how this works. Why does anyone take these
people seriously? It's just funny. I only bet
you people like this were leaning into some
of the work he was doing weeks ago
when it was something they thought was interesting.
But he says, what exactly do they support
that aligns with Trump? Well, if you look
at their work, it's like almost everything else,
but that's not the conversation we're gonna have.
But Insurrection Barbie says they're attacking Maha movement
for what?
I
mean, I could probably go off 15. I
could list off we will in a second
is the point about some of the things
Alex says. A lot of things that you
could be going after the movement or lack
thereof in regard to the government side of
it, but that's not you know, their interest
is about protecting the movement no matter what,
as I see it anyway. Now
funny,
I I was gonna do this after the
ARFC part, but because of the health overlap,
I decided to do this first. So next,
we're gonna get into the RFK blackmail
discussion. Okay? But I think it's funny is
that right as this kinda pops off,
the same day, by the way, or the
yesterday into today, I said, funny how when
RFK Jr is getting called out for being
blackmailed by Israel, Alex Jones rushes to create
a counternarrative,
almost like it's his job.
Here's what here's what came out. While everyone's
over here talking about this, he breaks the
story. RFK Jr is a % for real.
That's the title. Look out w a NWO
death cult. You know, unless you're rolling out
the the North American Union, then Alex is
gonna pull his punch and look over there
and yell about Europe. Right?
But it says RFK Jr removes
FDA vaccine chief pushing misinformation and lies. Now
I am clearly no supporter of doctor Marks,
Peter Marks. I've called him out throughout
for plenty of overlaps.
What's funny though is this also seems to
be a misrepresentation.
The best I can tell anyway. Because I
I don't know the internal dynamics. All you
get is the reports that are coming out
about it. My point is
this appears to be something where the guy
resigned, and that's what literally everyone's reporting. I
haven't seen I I looked to try to
find more than, like, him saying something. I
couldn't find it at least at the moment.
But it says, the senior health official who
was seen as a guardrail against any future
politicization of the FDA, part part probably I
doubt that, approved,
has resigned abruptly. Now look for yourself. This
is what literally everyone's reporting,
even right leaning platforms.
So it's interesting. You could argue that he
pressured him out, but this is the kind
of thing I was saying earlier. If he
resigned,
pointing at RFK Jr, then you then the
argument that he
removed him
is kinda dishonest. Right?
Now it says in his resignation,
it's right there.
See, if you remove somebody, they're not resigning,
I guess. But, again, as always, you could
argue that that was the way they played
it. Right? You you're fired, but I'll let
you resign publicly. That's certainly possible. My point
is it's funny how easy it is to
just frame things the way you want to.
But the main point is, RFK is a
% for real because this guy resigned saying
RFK Jr. Was a liar.
Kinda seems like you're trying to, you know,
pave the road the way you want to
as opposed to highlighting how it went down
in a way. Like, my idea, clearly, is
I think Marx is a complete, you know,
asset of the mainstream dynamic. RFK Junior, it's
up in the air, or at least, clearly
mainstream Israel, but RFK,
Alex seems to be kind of pulling the
punch for him everywhere he can.
But we'll point to something right here. So
here is what he said. Same day as
he just was like, for real, a %,
all this is coming out. Now let's be
real. Aside from what evidence we'll get into,
if the let's, you know, little there is
around this story,
if you can't already see by now the
overwhelming evidence that he is blinding himself to
Israel or is so supportive of it that
he doesn't I mean, again, this is not
a subjective conversation. Israel's committing war crimes according
to every single body that has any standing
in that conversation, and he is
pretending it's not happening. Both these people are.
I'm gonna play a clip from the,
oh, actually, I don't even think I downloaded
that actually. But there, you know, the,
Dave Smith
basically asked him about this and he just
kinda goes blank. Candice played a clip of
him basically just railing against RFK Jr about
how this is, like, biblically evil. And it
just it just kinda gross the way it's
obvious that he doesn't wanna answer the questions.
So anybody who's being real about this, you
have to argue that what he's doing
is is either he supports what Israel's doing
over there, which is disgusting, or something's affecting
his decision making process.
So it's that's let's just say that's my
take on it. Here's what here's what Alex
had to say. Just the first couple parts
of it.
I'm out here hiking Saturday morning.
I met with my buddy Sean, and we
were both already on x watching Candace Owens
and Ian Carroll. Literally
watching the same video
of him talk about Candace, then we just
hiked for an hour or so
and we're listening to her.
And so I'm just gonna respond to this.
I think Candace Owens is a great person,
super smart, super funny, super witty. So is
he and Carol. And I think all the
investigations they do and the things that they,
you know, research are really helpful to society,
and they're coming from, you know,
what they do from a place of
really trying to make the world a better
place. And and we really should have a
little bit debate about everything.
That said,
this whole art As they as they as
people love, you know, as an old saying
goes, everything before the word but
f k junior thing
with, oh, you know, there's these women and
people at events, and he's with women, and
this is going on. There's this writer over
here that, you know, attacked
Candace Owens and, you know, Rabbi Shmueli, who
is a demon.
And, you know, I don't like the fact
that Kennedy said certain such nice things about
him. It's ridiculous. Think about how wild it
is to support these people
completely,
and yet but he's a demon, though. Right?
So he completely leans into a demon, but
that's okay, though, because, you know, he's got
the right things going for him. I don't
know how you can go along with that.
A demon. Right? So it's okay that he's
being controlled by a demon? At the very
least, would that affect the way that you
frame this? You know, it just seems pretty
strange to me that that's the kind of
statement somebody could make, and that's not, like,
completely shocking to people. Tell us. So so
you do have to ask what's going on
there, but Kennedy's always supported Israel.
And me me personally, I don't like the
whole Palestinian thing and and Iran and and
Hezbollah and also don't like the stuff Israel
is doing. Israel clearly stood down on October
7. You know me. I don't It's brush
over the genocide, though. Right? Clearly stood down.
Yes. That's that's publicly acknowledged by literally everybody.
A whole Palestinian thing in Hezbollah. Like, what
are you talking about? Like, it's such a
what's it's in a it's such a
it's insulting
to brush over that story,
a a century of of
of genocide at like, he basically
both sized
that story, which just there's not an honest
overview of that, even in a quick overview
for this point. I just wanna point that
out. This is him trying to pretend that
he's somehow,
you know, calling out Israel, and he is
pulling every possible punch for Israel like I
think this is too. But that's the way
he plays this. It's kinda like, no. Trump
may be a liar, but let me go
on for six hours why he's your why
he's your savior.
So kind of though everything before but point
applies to pretty much everything he does, I
think. I think that's the biggest problem in
the world. I spent so my time on
it. But Let me go back, and this
is where he gets into this kind of
downplaying of the Israel story, which let's be
clear again. I'm gonna go through this
like we have before, but more specifically around
just the we need to recognize that Zionism,
not not Israel, which that's a hue it's
like saying only Jewish people, but, yes, Jewish
people does overlap with Zionism just like Christians
do. It's not just Israel.
As we can see today, clearly, it's not
just Israel. But Israel is a central point
for Zionism, but there is a lot of
people in Israel, not the minor not the
majority, a lot of Jews, a lot of
Israelis who are calling it all out. Right?
So it's not when they try to pocket
it in just Israel or Jewish people, that's
the ploy. Okay? This is about Zionism. That's
funny. I didn't mean to stop it on
a space like that.
So the when you try to make it
about something else, you try to make it
like we're obsessed with it, that's very suspicious
to me. Okay? Because the reality
is, Zionism,
wherever you see it in the world, is
clearly
the issue of our times, guys. You can
disagree with that, but you have to see
this, in my opinion, as something that is
central to I mean, what story happening right
now? Everywhere you're looking is not in some
way interconnected with their political ideology
as as what Zionism is rolling out through
Israel.
It's I mean, there's more Christian Zionist today
than there are Jewish Zionist. We have to
realize this is not something that the way
they pocket it. Now listen to what he
says. Thing and and Iran and and also
the like stuff Israel is doing. Israel clearly
stood down on October 7. You know me,
I don't think that's the biggest problem in
the world. I spent some of my time
on it, but, you know, millions dead. Some
of your time on it? No. Hardly. But
my point, though, is that even then, you
don't have to think it's the biggest story
in the world. But if you could if
you pretend like it's some kind of a
small side story or you spent year you
know, how what we've seen up into the
election overlap saying, why are you even talking
about Israel? And then they all lurch into
Europe. Right? It's just it's it is a
game.
And I also don't like to stop Israel
doing. Israel clearly stepped out on October 7.
You know me, I don't think that's the
biggest problem in the world. I spent some
of my time on it, but, you know,
millions dead in Ukraine,
Europe,
The UK, and, France openly sending troops now
to fight Russia.
And Putin's saying it will be a bloodbath.
We're ready for total war. That that Yeah.
Yeah. Oh, by the way, that's that's the
same war that he told you weeks ago
was completely done and over. We did it.
We won. I'm literally not making that up.
I should have found the clip. We did
it. It's over. Ukraine's done. I told promises
made, promises kept. I think he actually tweeted
that.
But now we're not. See, clearly funny how
that works. Funny how they people keep falling,
don't look back, and go, well, that was
crazy lie. But at the end of the
day,
do we not recognize that that's completely immersed
in the same US Israeli dynamic? It's what
it is, guys. That I mean, how do
we not see? Anybody with a brain can
see the overlap to Syria and how that
was used for this very conversation now Israel's
occupied Syria and has made built bases, deployed
troops. Guess we forgot to report about that,
Alex? Or the overlap to the reality of
their funding, the Azov movement, which was used
to create the whole dynamic. Now there's other
agendas involved. Yes.
But if you try to decouple those things,
you're just being dishonest.
And that's why it does come back to
the ideology. Don't you forget that they said
we're gonna turn Ukraine into a big Israel.
They've oh, every way they can. Same with
Syria now, telling you they're it's it's obvious
what's driving this bus.
They're just ignoring it. That's getting about one
percent of the coverage of just this total
Israel obsession.
So from my perspective,
I'm just so sick of being on air
thirty years and people always being obsessed with
Israel. The Christian Zionist that just worship it
and think you can do no wrong no
matter who's in charge there. The other side
that just thinks everything's run by Jews. I'm
just freaking tired of it. Okay? I got
attacked by the Israel lobby. I got attacked
by the Nazis. I I just can't stand
any of it. Yeah. So it sounds like
a back and forth or when you realize
that it's all the same side.
Yeah. Then then it becomes a lot more
clear. Now that's not to say that everybody
and every side is all the point is
that you the what he's highlighting there, the
radical Christian Zionist that are blind supporting Israel,
the ones that think it's all about Jewish
people, that's the same conversation. That is a
Zionism manipulation.
The rest of us in the world are
beginning to recognize that, to recognize that the
creation, like, screaming in everyone's face that this
is the state of the Jews and it's
all about the Jewish people and then people
turning around going, but then the Jewish people
did this. They go, well, that's you're a
racist.
Well, then you just get done telling me
that that and that's not what I'm saying.
I'm just saying that's the ploy right there,
to get people to fall into the trap
of blindly thinking that it's only Jewish people
so you could turn around and claim that
they have to exist to fight off the
evil anti Semitism that's building around the world.
But when he highlights it like that, the
reality is you can prove that the ADL,
for example, was caught creating fake Nazi marches
in Skokie, Illinois or I mean, we've gone
over all of this. I you think he
doesn't see this stuff? They don't post it
for him? So that if you can stand
back and realize the manufacturing
obsession.
This is why I've always been highlighting this
example and what this person is more so
today than ever because this is important to
how they've continued to sway people away from
the central point. It is like ultimately keeping
you focused in on some, you know, relevant
aspects of something, but as long as you
miss the real outcome, as long as you
miss the main point it's like saying with
like with q. Right? They don't care what
questions you're asking is or how's it going?
They don't,
oh, they don't care what questions you they
don't care what answers you find as long
as you're asking the wrong questions or something
like that. It's like they keep you down
the wrong path. So you feel like you're
finding things, but at the end of the
day, it's not relevant to the real point.
What I'm into is policy and
real results.
Yeah. So am I. That's the main thing.
Outcome and integrity, but that's obviously not what
they're doing is they keep getting caught lying
about what's actually happening and are blindly supportive
of one side regardless of what they do.
Right? See, this is how emulating the right
thing by while not doing it. The fruits
of the tree is Christ said. I'm a
Christian.
And
if you look at what RFK Junior is
doing, they killed the new COVID shot rollout.
They just fired that guy at HHS that
was Okay. Let's just deal with those two
first.
This is why I wanted to keep it
on the on the,
health related side.
I don't know why that's not going back.
Oh, god.
String guards keep killing me. Alright. So the
the obviously, the FDA guy resigned.
Now you could argue he got pushed out,
but everyone else is claiming he resigned. So
I think that's
a a a false win, but let's just
say he fired him fine. The point is
the argument that they stopped the rollout of
the COVID shot seems to be flatly false.
Now this is just a quick search that
says there's no specific information in the provided
context about RFK Jr directly killing the role
of a new COVID shot. That seems interesting.
And I looked this up, and then people
all talk about Mark's resigning, which seems to
be all over the conversation. But just a
quick overview, you can find that they're absolutely
rolling out a single collaboration shot for COVID
nineteen, cold,
cold, you know, MERS, flu. I
mean, it's just ran these are all over
the place. And, yes, it is currently rolling
out under the Trump administration.
New COVID shot for 2025
is already in in effect.
The CDC recommends currently that everyone 12 years
or older get the new 2024, '20 '20
'5 Novavax COVID '19 vaccine. Oh, and just
in case you thought I was just going
off with Brave, no. It's right there, right
on the main CDC website.
This is from January of twenty twenty five.
K? That's so currently still updated as of
Trump's administration in 2025, and everyone, it says,
should get the 2024
into 2025 COVID '19 vaccine. So was it
discontinued? No. They're still actively supporting it. So
it's funny how people can go along with
what you frame for them even though it's
not true.
We'll come back to these.
Stuff.
They've already put the notice in that the
thousands of chemicals that are in foods that
have this grandfather clause, that they can be
poisonous and deadly and addictive.
And and there's no testing or no rules
that's being taken out and they're all starting
to pull the garbage out. The poison dyes,
all of it.
Okay. Well, is that happening?
As best I can tell, that's just him
saying what they claim is going to be
happening maybe.
Typical.
But this is just one of the many
articles Arca Junior seeks to end rule allowing
food companies to bypass FDA. Right? So all
I as far as I could see, this
is happening. And I gave I was praising
this. I think this is a great step.
But at the moment, as far as I
could tell,
that's saying the the and then we've always
how long have we talked about this? It's
either gas or grad generally accepted as safe
or something like that. The rule allows companies
to self approve
the the inclusion of additives and food items
without requiring a review of the approval of
the of the FDA. The rule enables manufacturers
to add ingredients even if the FDA has
not turned its safety. You know, sort of
like the dangerous mRNA shots that no one
wants to call out, Trump's still rolling out.
But it says on Monday, HHS, RFK Jr,
directed the acting FDA commissioner to explore the
possibility
of eliminating the self affirmed GRAS pathway available
to companies.
Quote, this will enhance the FDA's oversight of
ingredients considered okay. So as far as I
can tell, and if you have more information,
you send it my way. This is how
far we've come so far. It's a we're
exploring
how that may happen.
Isn't that a bit dishonest to frame that
they're already doing things if I and and
maybe it has. And it has I think
that's great. I wasn't able to find that.
I looked pretty deep today and couldn't find
anything other than the idea of what we
may do. And if it happens, that's fantastic.
But this is the counterbalance framing of why
the other parts aren't important, and everyone so
far has actually been not true as far
as I could tell. That seems relevant to
me.
They're going after aspartame.
They're going after,
all the GMO stuff. I mean, this is
a real revolution. RFK Jr has been doing
this for decade after decade after decade and
and targeting real environmental crisis, cleaning up toxic
waste bills, you know, stuff that actually matters.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I agree with that. I
was that's what I was just saying. But,
by the way, the, purported r p junior
post about the GMO ban was actually from
parity account. But, you know, funny how that
stuff works out. Now look. I've heard him
call it GMOs too, but guess what? The
mRNA shots are literally GMO products. So let's
not keep pretending that narrative will win the
day. How about we do our due diligence
and recognize that people like that are literally
their job is to deceive you.
Of course, that's my opinion.
I honestly hope I'm wrong. I I don't
want there to be and people out there
misleading anybody. The sad reality is a lot
of that is happening. Now this is where
this gets interesting. Right? Because
on the right side of this conversation, Alex
Jones is leading people into the golden age
of the Trump administration as they're rolling you
into technocratic prisons. Ian Carroll has been pretty
wildly pro RFK in Trump, like, up until
the election and and and has kinda rapidly
been calling a lot of these things out,
which, you know, as always, there's a lot
of people out there that are jumping to
conclusions. I I think it's there's plenty of
suspicious reasons about somebody who rises to influence
this fast and all these different things that
happen.
I've I've expressed plenty of skepticism around this
person. But, nonetheless, as I've always said, I
don't think we can prove one way or
the other at this point. But I think
what's interesting is that he has clearly continued
to call things out in ways right now
that seem to be kind of frustrating other
Republicans. So take it for what you will.
That is interesting, and that leans in the
direction away from potentially
you know, unless that's just a win your
side. I mean, but the point is until
we know for sure with any of these
things, Alex, myself, anybody, guys, you don't know,
then don't let's not keep screaming. We know
one way or the other that he's paid
for this or he's a shill for that.
Who knows? Consider it always, but look
end with what you can prove. So in
this case, we have Ian Carroll putting out
this story. This was yesterday. 5,400,000
views. That's what Alex was commenting on, that
it's kind of like, well, they're good people
and they do good things, but basically, this
is not the right thing is what he
was getting at. Right? So let's watch this.
Now this this is this is him breaking
down an overlap of the information, which I
thought was the quickest way to get all
the the small things out around this and
from from,
Candace Owens' show, which is this right here.
Here's the full link for you if you
wanna watch it. It's, I believe it was
over an hour, and it's just about her
breaking down the story. He kind of encapsulates
some of it, overlaps with the RK junior
point.
Again,
you'll see from you'll see what you look
at the information. It seems to be kinda
subjective.
Doesn't mean meaningless. Right? But it's interesting timing
for this story to come out the way
that it did and really kind of rooted
in something that really wasn't secret.
So you let me just I'll play it.
Well well, I'll I'll try to stop that
often. You guys tell me what you think
about this and whether this is
breaking information about him being blackmailed
for Israel, which is the point,
or, you know, by Israel rather,
or if this is an effort to sort
of stymie the conversation as something that is
not proven.
Or maybe this is just him doing what
he thinks is best and somebody else is
manipulating him. And that's always these possibilities. I
do think a huge part of the independent
meet mainstream alternative media are people that are
jumping at the shadows presented to them. In
some cases, it does have meaning. In other
cases, it's just a way to deviate you,
but if there's people going through what they
think is in front of them.
And I think, you know, you know, from
my perspective, how often I talk about the
try you know, erring on the side of
objectivity.
When I I I fall short myself, but
it's about trying as we jokingly call it,
irritatingly objective. And the reason I said that
is because today, we see why that's necessary.
Because people acting in with good intention can
easily be misled if they don't have that
guidance of strict principles. That if we can't
prove it, we don't go any further. Right?
If we don't know, we don't take that.
It's very simple. So that's why you see
people like this that I think, you know,
rise to
incredibly fast. I think it's because they're, in
some ways, being led along. I mean, he
was a pretty strong cheerleader for the Trump
administration before the, you know, selection process.
Maybe that was all it was about. The
point is be objective.
Consider it for what you will.
The Bobby Kennedy blackmail story is currently breaking
in many directions
all across the Internet,
and American politics is not gonna be the
same after this weekend.
That's not hyperbole. This is not just a
hook. I do think that's a
pretty quite a that's a large I think
that's a bit overblowing what he will present.
You can decide for yourself. And I don't
really know where to start. But this is
the kind of story that I've gotten enough
calls from enough people tonight and enough people
there's enough going on that I feel like
we need to make a video right now
to keep some people safe and to get
as much as we all know out on
the Internet right now so that everyone can
be safe. That's the other thing, by the
way, that I wanted to just get out
before we play it all.
Is it's it's kinda odd to me that
this is being framed as, like, the journalists
are in danger,
which is kinda counterintuitive. Like, the journalists are
the ones who are supposed to be putting
themselves in danger to protect the source. To
me, this argument in this that it's so
we have to do this because journalists are
in danger, it feels like a weird way
to frame this.
But maybe, again, this is just, you know,
he's just a guy on the Internet. Like,
he doesn't ever claim to be a big
journalist or that he, I mean, kinda does
say that himself in this video, but, you
know, that he he's been the one that
has self expressed the fact that he's new
to this and he's kinda, you know, that
that keep that in mind. But it's interesting
though that if we're talking about the people
who are covering the story,
and almost in a way that there's more
information that they're not putting out because they
think they're at risk, like, that's the opposite
of what should be happening here.
I mean, the idea that we should be
breaking the information for people to know it,
and my opinion is that the more you
put it out publicly, the the the safer
you are as opposed to having information that
they might wanna stop from being removed shown
kind of a thing.
And the best place for everyone to start
is at Candice's video that she put up
today that she very aptly titled one nation
under blackmail.
Go watch it. She does a way better
job of explaining a bunch of what's going
on than I could. But as soon as
I was, like, ten minutes into it, and
then I started getting phone calls from sources
telling me more information
that is corroborating and taking it even further
than what is exposed in that video. Okay.
I have to I'm sorry. I do have
to say one thing there too. I keep
forgetting where I wanted to stop. This is
very kinda telling to me. And and that
kind of does lean into the possibility that
this is somebody who's being kind of led
by the nose, which is the idea that
you know, so you're watching this video as
Alex and everybody else was saying we were
hiking, and we're watching these two videos. You
know, that's kind of the thing that's overtaking,
And he gets a bunch of calls. Okay.
So I I think it's kinda self explanatory
that that is not source material.
People saying things over the phone
that confirms what you think is going on,
and I'm I'm gonna show you that this
all seems to be very kind of superficial
in a lot of ways, not in any
way saying that I mean, my thought is
that, like I said, I think I established
in the beginning that whether this is it
or not, that I do think he's in
some way being manipulated or he's always been
deceiving.
But
I think it's easy to see how somebody
like this could get the call from the
person that has a lot of influence that
says, I know this for sure, and all
of a sudden that becomes second confirmation. And,
you know,
I do think there's a very clear kind
of infrastructure
of how they drip these things out through
certain controlled, in many ways, people that don't
know that aspects. And I wanna be clear.
I'm not saying I even think that about
him. I'm completely up in the I'm honestly
right down the middle right now. I'm not
sure what I think about Ian. I do
think some of the things he does have
pretty positive effects on the outcome, but I
also see a lot that makes me very
worried. Now I'll play some clips from Derrick
Rose in a minute.
And I have sources telling me that there
are people in, like, media and around Bobby
that know about this and know it's coming
and are trying to protect him and save
him from this.
But it is past that. And there is
no saving anyone from this, I think, and
we just have to deal with what's about
to happen. So I'm gonna leave all of
that out, and we're gonna start the story
here with our girl Jessica,
House and Habit.
She had tasked one of her writers,
Emily Hagen,
with writing a hit piece about Candace Owens.
They were trying to create or dig up
some dirt on Candace's husband for some reason
to take her down
For reasons we'll kind of get to in
a second,
Emily submitted a draft kind of, and they
Jessica, House and Habit,
was having her girl, I believe Olivia Newsy,
read through it, and it was like, we
can't publish that. It's too four Channy. House
and Habit
clarified that it needs to be a clean
shot, a clean shot to take down Candace
Owens.
Good fucking luck with that. If you don't
remember who Olivia Nosey is,
she's the woman that had the sexting scandal
with RFK
last year, who then cozied up to House
and Habit for reasons that are not entirely
clear and sort of started secretly editing there
behind the scenes and and kind of replacing
people and getting really close to Jessica Reed
Krause House and Habit for reasons that are
still not entirely clear as far as I'm
aware. To be fair, there's a lot that
is not entirely clear because this is so
complicated, and everything in this video is hearsay
and rumors.
And, obviously, when they tried to come to
Candace and it created all this drama and
Candace don't take no fucking shit, and Jessica
had been super mean to the writer of
the article and then had then fired her.
And so her and Emily had had all
this drama and then then the her other
best friend and had gotten super fucking vitriolic.
And, eventually, Emily was like, fuck it.
Hey. Sorry, guys. I I I definitely always
give a heads up for cursing. I just
I just spaced. I I was here. I'm
sorry about that. So he cusses obviously throughout
this video. So if you have chills around,
earbuffs, I apologize for that.
And rumors.
And, obviously, when they tried to come to
Candace and it created all this drama and
Candice don't take no fucking shit, and Jessica
had been super mean to the writer of
the article and then had then fired her.
And so her and Emily had had all
this drama and then done up her other
best friend and then gotten super fucking vitriolic.
And, eventually, Emily was like, fuck it. I'm
just gonna go to Candace and come clean
and say what's going on. That's how we
got this video. And I was on Now
up at this point and you can watch
Candace's video. This is why I it's a
an encapsulation
of what she's just kinda discussing, and she
shows the same screenshots.
I I don't know how you'd never fair
prove any of this. Right? In the context
of her coming to her so, basically, she
comes to Candace and relay reveals the information.
Right? So that's where we are. This is
everything up until that point, as far as
I can tell, has pretty much already been
public. The background of this already at least
being discussed from RFK. You know? So the
argument being that this is where the kind
of blackmail develops. I I kind of agree
with the larger sentiment today that that seems
like a pretty milquetoast thing, especially with what
he's been saying out publicly even and and
that's already been sort of discussed,
you know, for that I guess, if a
tape came out showing him sexing with some
woman. I mean, I I get you asked
with the position they're in. It probably would
be used against him pretty obviously.
But I just I don't know if that
would go to the level of blackmail by
an Israeli government to allow what's happening. You
see what I'm saying? Like, I don't know.
It's it's but my overall point as we
continue is that it seems to be rooted
in a lot of subjectivity right now.
Fifteen minutes into this video when I started
getting interrupted
by all kinds of calls from all kinds
of people
all over
the country
that have more information about this. And let's
not forget that how often this has happened
and just since 2024
or '5 forward,
around these popping off partisan stories where everyone's
gotta take and 80% of them turn out
to be BS.
Drones and fog and whatever else we've talked
about where a lot of these jumping partisan
screamers will reach into the story and be
like, my secret sources. We saw that with
Sean Ryan. Right? So just ask yourself whether
I mean, listen. Let's just make a point.
Whether it's this or not, every time that
happens.
So people are opportunists.
They're grifters. They jump in. They wanna add
they, you know, leak this to you know,
however it works. This is we always have
to consider that's part of the stories when
we see these partisan stories kickoff.
And, really, it's I shouldn't even make it
a partisanship. It's just people that are there's
always gonna be a dishonest person that tries
to benefit from a situation. So just consider
that especially what we see today in partisanship.
Because this story
is way past the point of no return,
and it is way bigger than some girl
drama. So at the second Trump Butler rally
in July of last year, House and Habit
was hanging out with some of the people
that I know
and apparently receiving a bunch of phone calls
all about this blackmail situation with the Olivia
Nuzzi
sexting scandal.
And while she was taking calls, she was
kind of filling them in excitedly
on the story as she was getting it,
kind of as though she was gonna write
a piece about it. And what they were
told is that it was
many, many, many, many instances
of recorded
video
stuff.
They were told in some form that
Olivia Nuzzi's husband was in on recording it,
whether that is him tapping her phone
or her and him as a husband wife
couple kind of
targeting him. I mean I'll show you what
at least Brave's AI response says about that
in particular that seems at least to be
suggested that it was kind of a forced
situation between the two, which I'll go into
why I think that's interesting in regard to
the overlap with potential
sexual blackmail operations. I mean, Olivia Nuzzi did
insert herself into the RFK campaign, and then
all this stuff happened. And then when I
was at Rescue the Republic event just a
few months later, I was hearing all kinds
of rumors, and a lot of people were
hearing rumors
about dick pics that were apparently coming out
that never came out.
I suspect that that was a misunderstanding
of this story
sort of being
kinda rumored around. Or they were all wrong
about a different story. Right? So that that's
how often we can see these rumblings of
nonsense that go around partisan circles that never
become stories because there's a lot of dishonesty
in partisan circles. So it's certainly possible that
they misunderstood this story, which by the way
makes them also sharing wrong information then,
but also that they could have just been
wrong about a different story.
He's I mean, I same point, I think.
So what we got was a story that
Olivia Nuzzi and him had had a romantic
emotional connection over the phone that had caused
her it was inappropriate, and he apologized. And
so she left the campaign sort of, and
then went and got real cozy with House
and Habit, who had a lot of details,
who was right. I don't know what happened
there. But I know that what a very
trusted person on my end told me that
they heard at that event was that it
was not just that. It was recordings of
video sex. So someone he trusts who told
him that they heard.
That doesn't mean false, by the way, but
let's just be real. Now look. I it's
like I said to begin, I'm he nobody's
under some obligation to adhere to what I
argue is what we should all be doing
when we present information. Okay? But it is
important to highlight this for this kind of
grouping that does
continually, as even this video, frame themselves as
the journalist breaking the news. So just consider
that. But this and even then, there's plenty
of journalists out there that use second information
in the reporting. But I just wanna be
clear and objective about this. And there's more
to come. I just think it's interesting that
that the way the story has gone, and
it is reverberating through the conversation today
while there's a lot of very provable things
happening. That's that's one of the larger obvious
points today.
There's also a lot of swirling rumors of
other people that he's been having sex with
that are very heartbreaking and inappropriate.
By the way, someone in the chat, I
do wanna point out, I hearsay, second information,
that still counts as evidence, guys. Evidence is
just a data point. Evidence can be falsified.
I say it all the time. So consider
that proof
is different. But evidence is just you know,
somebody said they heard this from somebody. That's
a piece of evidence that you're supposed to
investigate to suss out the relevance of, if
any.
But I started to wonder,
who might Olivia Nosey and possibly her husband,
who, if they'd had that, who might they
have passed such blackmail to? Either sold it
or been sent by some group.
And you need look no further than her
Wikipedia page to learn that in 2013,
just out of university,
actually, while still in university, she volunteered as
an intern for Anthony Weiner's
New York City mayoral campaign.
If you don't know about Anthony Weiner,
look it up. And that is a direct
tie to Huma Abedin and to Hillary Clinton
and to
at that point, just pick your term for
whatever deep state groups you wanna talk about,
that blackmail could be anywhere.
Okay. Now this is my point about the
kind of right. So that's a huge jump.
Just if we're gonna be objective about this
and be actual journalists about this, that is
a big assumptive jump.
Obviously, Tys Hillary Clinton should not be ignored.
Obviously, ties to people like Weiner should not
be ignored because of how often these people
have been caught up in these scandals and
are connected to the same kind of infrastructure.
Right?
But it doesn't prove that just because she
went to the same location is or what
was the exact framing?
It was she was 20 year old junior
at the university when she volunteered as an
intern for Anthony Weiner. So just because she
was an intern for him does not therefore
prove that today that makes her compromise. It
definitely could. And I'm not saying he's saying
that proves it, but I just think that's
important. That's a huge leap of logic there
to say that that connection means that this
is where the blackmail ended up, if even
actually is the case. Right? So let's keep
going.
He volunteered as an intern. That is a
direct tie to think we all know Hillary
Clinton and to,
at that point, just pick your term for
whatever deep state groups you wanna talk about.
And then, you know, this kind of abstract
deep state groups.
You know? I mean, he was the one
on Joe Rogan that was kind of belittling
David Icke's perspective and and Webb Webb's kind
of Woody Webb's unhinged perspective on technocracy. Meanwhile,
making this kind of a, you know,
deep I mean,
obviously and he did say in that conversation
that it's not just one group people on
a table, and I agree with that. But,
ultimately, if you really go far enough, it
really does ultimately come back to a centrally
controlling structure or maybe a certain grouping of
power of people. Then the overarching point, though,
is that the deep state is an abstract
idea.
Right? It's not a certain the way it's
become today is the even as Benjamin Netanyahu
is showing you right now, clearly picking up
on it or showing you that he handed
down the narrative,
that he's fighting the deep state now. That's
all that's happening. Don't worry about anything else.
That's what he's literally saying now. Even though
the reality is he's destroying this country from
within that his own people are saying. So
the group aspect is just kind of a
problem on the way they frame it that
way. That it's, you know, the what my
point is that Democrats and Republicans are simply
pointing at certain ideas, that they're the problem.
They're the problem instead of the reality of
all of our power structure being circum
being manipulated by this kind of unelected bureaucracy,
many of which we're now seeing show their
faces
in front. That's That's how I see it
anyway. But to just say that there's a
connection to Clinton, therefore, you choose what group
you want to demonize,
I don't like that.
That black male could be anywhere by now,
but
I think we all know
who has it. And Candace
certainly knows who has it. I I'm pretty
sure, obviously, he's insinuating Israel. But, again, I
would agree that's logical, but I don't know
why we would say we all know that's
who has it. Even though you trust me,
I know you know my opinions are probably
pretty clear. I don't think we can prove
that.
But, see, right now, you're gonna get the
conversation on the Internet where there are people
who are 100%
certain that this is the case because of
this video or, alternatively, people that are saying
that he's completely,
you know, making things up. But it's interesting
how this partisan game works today. All that
we're all doing at the moment is pretending
that RK Jr's unflinching
loyalty
and quite frankly,
his fear
of saying anything negative about Israel. I pull
up Dave Smith here. The the worst humanitarian
catastrophe in the world right now and the
idea that you, who are supposed to be
the anti neocon,
antiwar presidential candidate,
are immediately on October 7, before we even
had an investigation, before we even knew what
happened there, you immediately say what basically, you
said everything they say about Ukraine. You said
it was an unprovoked attack, which, like, come
on. Give me a break. An attack from
Gaza against Israel is unprovoked. And then you
said we have to support them in whatever
it takes. Well, look, sir. We're watching it
right now. This is whatever it takes. And
just to clarify, there's a lot of other
evidence that
Israel
and Israel aligned people are involved in having
this blackmail, but I don't wanna get into
details just yet because
that would kind of compromise some of the
journalists that are currently a little at risk.
Right now, Bobby I don't understand that.
So if if you're talking about you want
you're you don't wanna compromise the story they're
putting together, that's different. But so you're telling
me that by by releasing information that's relevant
to people who also
might also be at risk because of the
story in general, that the information you provide
might give them some clearance or some understanding
to have them avoid for but we're gonna
protect the journalist.
That there the journalist is at risk.
So why wouldn't the information be presented to
us? Why wouldn't everybody release the facts so
we understand what's going on?
To me, that seems almost suspicious.
I'm not even saying towards him. I'm saying
that's a strange thing to say for me.
What journalists are out there putting themselves as
the story? We are the ones being protected
by the information.
That's you guys have that backwards. Okay? I'm
not saying that journalists are required to put
their lives at risk for information. I argue
that is what our jobs are. But my
point, though, is that to say that you
not him, but people out there, maybe saying
to him
that they won't do this because we're I
feel like that means they've lost touch with
what their position is or they're dishonest.
His own staff around him
are they know this, and they have been
trying to find the handlers
handler
that's close to him because it must be
very close in order to be managing his
tweets and managing his appearances and everything he's
doing. And it sounds like there's a lot
of people that are trying to protect him
from this coming out, but it is all
Right. So a cover up. So let's let's
be clear. Even though he's being, if that's
the case, the one blackmailed
so that's funny. Great. So it looks like
Odysee and and, Twitter or
Instagram have both gone down. Not sure why.
The point is that
the I just lost it. Damn it when
I said that.
Handler that's close to him because it must
be very close in order to be managing
his tweets and managing Oh, yes. Right. So
a cover up. Right? So the point being
that he's clearly you know, yes. If if
this is the case, the one being blackmailed,
but at the same time, there's things he
did that he did that they're trying to
expose. Now just having sexual relations with somebody
is not a crime, but who knows if
that's what adult maybe that's maybe it's more
than that. I mean, let's be clear. That's
what I think a lot of people are
saying. If this is just simply some lewd
some some some people consenting adults doing something
online,
Pretty sure that's, especially today, a pretty milquetoast
claim. So he's a he's a person. And,
yes, it's embarrassing, but that's not enough for
people to do what we're seeing. It implies
there's something far more compromising that it's with
somebody he shouldn't be or something that's against
the law. That's what that's what Israeli blackmail,
Epstein style stuff was really about.
Wildly compromising positions with disgusting proclivities. That's what
it's everyone we've talked about. So this,
I don't know. It feels like there's either
a huge part of this missing or this
is all something to mislead people. I'm not
talking about the entire part of RFK blackmail
overlap. I just mean the way this being
presented, the way it's being done, maybe using
him, maybe not. I don't know.
His appearances and everything he's doing, and it
sounds like there's a lot of people that
are trying to protect him from this coming
out, but it is already coming out. And,
unfortunately, it is out enough that
journalists are in danger. And the point of
this video is to let everyone know that
the journalists are all in connection, and we
are all talking. And we all know the
story, and we have all shared it already,
and we are all location sharing with each
other. So what are we talking about at
this point? What? What's the story? That he
is on video with some set with some
video sexting?
Or or is it this opaque part that
you didn't mention that seems to be the
entire story if that's the case?
I don't understand this, guys. Am I missing
something? To me, this is a completely subjective
sexting conversation about something we can't get shown,
but they know because they were talk I
I this feels very off to me in
a lot of ways.
I'm not even remotely trying to suggest that
that means he knows that or maybe I'm
wrong. But what do you think? I'm not
this is a cup there's a little bit
left. I just feel like this seems very,
very, very manipulative. And even unless there's the
part that he's not allowed to say because
these journalists are in danger, whatever that means,
unless that part is the the the whole
story, all of this seems like a pretty
small story in the context of what's going
on. And if it's only about sexting on
video, then it's just an embarrassing video, and
it's not really even a big story other
than it's embarrassing for a politician to be
doing what everyone does.
You see what I'm saying? Like, I I
I unless I'm missing something. You tell me.
And we are looking out for each other.
And so Emily Hagen
is protected.
And we are Yeah. There's somebody in the
chat says, yes. All journalists are connected. Investigative
journalists is pretty much like, it's weird. Right?
We're all connected. We're all talking. What do
you mean we are all?
I it's just it's a weird way to
frame this. In a way, it's cementing in
this idea that we are the media now
and this group of people that are almost
predominantly deceiving people
deceiving, misleading people. I said both at the
same time. I mean, that's not my opinion.
Look look at the track record. And at
the same time, take a look at our
track record or many others in this field
or the IMA in general.
I shouldn't have to point that out. If
you go back and look at the consistency
of how often we've been incredibly right about
stories well before it comes to pass
and then compare it to the ongoing we
are the meeting now direction of every other
day putting out fake information or things that
never come to pass or sources that claim
things that aren't even real.
And, yeah, sometimes there's things that are accurate,
and they're usually about benign stories that don't
really change the conversation.
But I think it's obvious if you really
stand back and look at the bigger picture.
Watching her, and we have her location shared,
and she's already put her stuff out on
the on the Internet. But if anything were
to happen to her,
we are watching, and we will know who
did it. There are other people too that
have information about this stuff. And we'll know
who did it?
I mean, what's the implication there? That what
if anything happens to her, Israel killed her?
Certainly something we should consider, but how would
we know that?
Like, I I actually think in a way
this is training people how not to be
objective.
That are in positions that are a little
scary right now. And to everyone out there
in the bad team,
we are also in touch with them, and
we are also watching them and location sharing
with them. Do not touch anyone.
Okay. That's really silly to me. Like, almost
cartoonish, but almost I mean, what are we
talking about? Are you you're now directing the
video to the deep state? Is that what's
happening? Acted. And we are watching her, and
we have her location shared, and she's already
put her stuff out on the on the
Internet. But if anything were to happen to
her,
we are watching. Okay. Yeah. That's fine. That's
fair to say. Right? Whatever. Who who knows
what's going on? If some something happens to
her, we're watch we're we're we're we're primed
and paying attention. And we will know who
did it. I don't know about that. But
There are other people too that have information
about this stuff. Other people who have information.
That are in positions that are a little
scary. Right? That are in positions that are
scary.
What does that mean?
So you're withholding important information that might keep
other people safe, and you think that's something
that you I mean, that's that's putting the
information out is what will keep you safe.
That's my opinion, but how do we even
know that's true? What does that even mean?
These are the journalists are putting themselves as
the story, apparently. You're the one that are
supposed to be protecting the sources of information,
not becoming the story yourself. Now and to
everyone out there in the bad team To
everyone in the bad team, what does that
mean? The deep state, I guess. We are
also in touch with them, and we are
also watching them and location sharing with them.
I guess the grouping of journalists that haven't
released the information that are scared, and we're
keeping a tab on them.
I I somebody help me frame that. So
people that we don't even know so maybe
they don't exist. Maybe they do. We don't
have names. We don't know what they have.
We don't know what information they add to
the story,
but they're scared,
and they're keeping tabs on them. We have
the locations.
So let's just say they all die all
of a sudden. What there was that mean
to anybody else?
We don't know who they are, what they
had, what's going on. So that story will
become this grouping of inner working people that
were watching them knows they died, and here's
the bigger story, but we can't prove.
I mean, I just think this sounds a
little bit silly at this point. I I
am I crazy?
Now I let's just be clear. That maybe
the entire story is true. That's certainly possible.
But I think it's a little bit odd.
This is like a Twitter files
dry run for real breaking information.
Do not touch anyone. Decentralized me Yeah. But
don't do it, though. Deep state, if you're
listening, you don't do it because we're watching.
Media is doing its thing. And I wish
that we didn't have to do it this
way. And I do not know all the
details yet, and I don't know if every
single little detail that I just said is
correct.
You gotta love that disclaimer. Maybe put that
in the beginning of the video next time.
But I know that enough of it is
going on, and I'm getting it from, like,
at, like, five to six different sources, seven
different sources tonight
that Can we know who those sources are?
Well, we don't always get to know the
sources. Right? But unless you can verify something,
it all becomes trust my sources,
which is kinda typical for the mainstream alternative
media. That doesn't mean false.
But what we've seen so far is clear
to suggest that he's, in some cases, willing
to take what they claim without ever really
being able to flush these things out, like
he just said at the end. So for
all we know, this is him being played
by a bunch of conservative hype spinsters, guys,
or just nonpartisan spinsters that manipulate everybody in
the partisanship,
or the CIA who literally dumps fake stories
into people's laps just like this.
This is coming out, and the next months
are gonna be
completely insane. To everyone who's gonna be watching
this unfold,
think very critically. Take your time. Don't trust
anyone. Don't trust me. Don't trust just take
your time and watch it come out, and
and don't rush to judgments. That's fair. I
agree with that. There is going to be
media spin on media spin on media spin.
There will be personal attacks, character assassinations.
The entire playbook is about to come out.
Jessica, the time to come clean is right
now. You have an opportunity to tell the
truth. And, Bobby, I am I mean, isn't
it funny? So it he ends with, like,
absolute certainty even though he made it clear
that this isn't absolutely clear. Maybe not everything
our port is accurate, but you better come
clean, and we're all coming after you. I
mean okay. Just to end well, I was
finished last time. That this is how this
has to happen, but
your opportunity to tell the truth is coming
right up. And to everyone that's gonna say
I told you so,
you're right.
You did tell us.
Well, at least he said that. Right? Because
a lot of us did say that this
is an issue well before we got here.
But, I mean, look. I I I am
very clearly suspicious about all of this. The
way that this whole thing was laid out
feels really off to me. But I'm not
gonna claim I know for sure because that's
the extent of the information. It just feels
like a big subjective, assumptive,
here's a lot of what we think, but
we can't show you everything, so trust the
plan and more may come out. When now
when that thing comes out that we can't
show, try we we'll the people try to
people will try to come after it, and
they'll try to tell you it's not true.
And we're left here like, okay. So the
story is I've got something we can't show
you at the end of the day. Because
everything else we already pretty much knew other
than the implication that he's blackmailed through Israel
because of all of it, that we don't
get any evidence for, which, let's be clear,
I also think is a likely possibility, but
not even because of any of this.
I just think this is very strange.
Now back to the CIA point very quickly.
Don't forget this clip. K? This is what
they do. This goes back to the seventies.
Well, one of the four
principal functions of the CIA is to gather
intelligence and
and ideally forward it to the
the president, the users of information, the policy
makers, as they say. There are other functions,
however, some of them more legitimate than others.
One is to run secret wars, the covert
action that's written and talked about so much,
like what's happening in Nicaragua today from Honduras.
Another thing is to
disseminate propaganda to influence people's minds,
and this is a major function of the
CIA.
And, unfortunately,
of course, it overlaps
into the gathering of information.
You you have contact with a journalist.
You will give him true stories. You'll get
information from him. You'll also give him false
stories. Did you buy his confidence with true
stories? You buy his confidence and set him
up. We've seen this happen in, recently with
Jack Anderson, for example, who who has his
intelligence sources, and he has also admitted that
he's been set up by them. You know,
every fifth story just simply being false.
You also work on their human
vulnerabilities to recruit them in a classic sense
to make them your agent so that you
can control what they do. So you don't
have to set them up sort of, you
know, by by putting one over on them
so you can
Yep. I think that's where we are. I
think we're at a point where this is
I'm I'm not saying I know for sure
him. I'm just saying I think that we're
clearly seeing this happen again or, really, the
never actually stop is the clear point. But
I think it's important to recognize that that's
part of this game. Now I think it's
also relevant to include this on that, you
know, even with the timing of this. That
oh, especially with the CIA example.
Here's Donald Trump on 01/02/2025
saying the CIA must get involved now.
Oh, it does not make propaganda ice through
plenty of other groups. I just think it's
relevant to include. But so there there's his
breakdown. As he said, RFK Jr blackmail story
is breaking. So what you just saw his
entire breakdown. Now if and I wanna I
do wanna show you.
Here's Candace Owen's video. You can watch the
whole thing. It's about an hour long. But
if you scroll through this and you you
can, you know, you you have you have
clips.
For the most part, you've got screenshots of
the exchange.
What I my point though is that this
is her explaining the story just at much
more length with more a little more detail
about the ins and outs of the actual
back and forth about the person doing the
story on her.
Okay. But
the argument of him being blackmailed is that
this person
had a connection with him, and it becomes
this subjective story.
I think that's and and this story has
taken all taken all the air out of
the room.
I find that really telling right now. So
here's her full one if you wanna watch
it. It says in this shocking twist of
events, we learned that Olivia Newsy, RFK Junior's
sexting companion, which we already knew, is orchestrating
media hit pieces via
this is the one he pointed to, Jessica
Re Krauss,
saying, what do we have in common?
I guess calling out Israel, but see, does
that prove the case? Now here's what's interesting.
Here's the just asking
Brave,
asking, the just the general story. It says
Olivia Newsy, a New York magazine reporter, has
accused her ex fiance, Ryan Lizza,
of orchestrating a blackmail campaign against her. So
Newsy is the one they're pointing to, remember?
And it says that so she's claiming that
her ex fiance is the one that did
this to her
against her following,
saying a forfeiture to blackmail campaign against her
following revelations about her personal relationship with RFQ
Junior.
According to Newsies court filings court filings, which,
of course, could be lies, Lizzie allegedly began
the harassment campaign
at the July. So her ex fiance harassing
her or basically forcing her to do this.
Attempting to blackmail her
back into a relationship with RFK Jr. So
that speaks to what what,
Ian was was pointing to. So at least
the claim is
that he got, I guess, caught them and
then forced her to go back with him
to to blackmail
something. Her, but it wouldn't make sense if
he forced her, him maybe. But it says
Newsy claims that Liza Liza stole a personal
electronic device from her, hacked his her devices,
and anonymously sent personal information about her to
the media. Now does that sound like some
random disgruntled ex boyfriend, ex fiance?
You know, not everyone can just randomly hack
devices and anonymous right? Okay. So it says
she also alleges that Liza impersonated an anonymous
campaign operative to give the political campaign information
that would harm her fewer further. Again, sounds
like more like an intelligence apparatus operative than
a random disgruntled ex fiance. Right? In response
to these accusations, and this is all completely
subjective. This is not something we can prove.
We're just connecting more of these potential dots.
In response to these accusations, Liza has denied
the allegations,
the the ex fiancee, so she could lying
potentially about what he did, stating that they
are lies. He has also accused Newsy,
the journalist they're pointing to, of using
litigation with false and defamatory allegations as a
public relations strategy.
The accusations and Niles have added another layer
of controversy to this whole scandal, which we've
already talked about.
Now this is what I found interesting, just
as this overlap. Now, again, this is completely
subjective.
This guy, Ryan Lizza,
her her ex fiance, who she claims is
blackmailing her, which is she's the one that
they're claiming is black, or rather involved with
the potential blackmail
story
of RFK Jr, potentially.
Liza, her
ex fiance, says sexual misconduct allegations
on 02/2017.
New Yorker fired Lizzie.
Excuse me. I keep reiterating it because it
just sounds so close to to newsy Lizzie,
I guess. It's just close. So he the
the ex fiance.
It says in 02/2017,
the New Yorker fired him saying that he
engaged in, quote, improper sexual conduct.
Now he called the New Yorker's characterization a
terrible mistake that had been made hastily and
without full investigation of the facts. His alleged
victim supported the magazine's
version of the event, so claiming she was
abused by him. His alleged victim supported the
magazine's events. In a statement, her attorney
said in no way did mister Lisa Liza's
misconduct constitute a respectful relationship as he now
tries to characterize it? So that story end
where he he got removed,
and they they everyone was continuing to say
that he abused her or at least was
inappropriate.
Now Liza was temporarily suspended by CNN pending
the investigation.
But six weeks later, the network announced that
an extensive investigation had yielded, quote, no reason
to continue to keep him out of the
off the air.
Politico, Rolling Stone, and other media organizations were
later said to have reached the same conclusion.
Even though the evidence didn't change, they just
said, well, well, we investigated. It doesn't seem
to be a problem. He's back in. Okay.
That's basically how it went down. Maybe they're
maybe they're right. Maybe it was all made
up. My interesting thought is if we're trying
to connect this,
right, to some conversation of a black male
network, whether you think it's Israel or not,
what do we come to expect in this
conversation? Whether let's just say Epstein, for example.
Well, it's this kind of situation where somebody
gets caught in something like this, and they
don't get rid of them. They patch it
over. They keep them in their position, but
they go, if you ever go against us,
well, we're gonna break this story. And not
just the milk toast he abused her, but
the real story, you know, where you got
caught with
I mean, I I can make a joke
right there. Just, you know, the worst thing
you can imagine.
So to me, that's an interesting standout. So
he got in his own situation,
then they patched over it or maybe it
was a lie. And then we come later
to the story to where he's the one
she's claiming blackmailed her
into not not just blackmailed her, but blackmailed
her into pushing a fake or, I guess,
the extension of a relationship that would be
fake since it was already to an end
to a degree with RK Junior.
So to me, that very much sounds like
a blackmail network, like exactly what we know
from Israel Epstein
to where she this person who potentially was
already compromised was the one trying to compromise
her to use that against RK Jr, or
who knows how that when it plays out?
May maybe it's a Democrat action to make
RK look bad. Anything's possible,
but it does sound interesting.
But I would say, at at this point,
that's the extent of the evidence, and that's
really all I just simply showed is just
a background data point.
I would say, well, we don't know. Right?
That's where an honest, objective reporter would put
this right now that I don't think that's
provable.
Indy News just points out, not only did
we know about Olivia Newsy's stuff last fall,
which we did, and he post all the
links, we also knew he had a lot
of skeletons, RFK Jr.
We talked about it in our Andy talked
about it in their article documenting a bunch
of red flags with RFK Jr. These screen
caps were, were from where the,
were from this article, RFK Jr field of
red flags, they call it. Here's the article
they wrote. You can read it for yourself.
The point is that that I agree that
there's a lot of information
that was already out there that seems quite
a bit more damning than just some sexting
videos. That's why it seems as if the
insinuation
is that there's more we just can't show
you because we're all in danger.
Maybe.
I really do find that strange, quite frankly.
I mean, if you're you know, same point.
Now
David Icke commented on this clip,
and he says, but hold on. This guy
celebrated the appointment of our RFK Jr when
anyone with a brain cell knew he was
owned by Israel. Now, again, that's a subjective
claim. I mean, I agree with that, but
I don't think we can argue we knew
and that everyone knows.
But
I would argue it was that clear that
there was something off and it was in
the direction of Israel. I think everybody could
see that. Everyone did say that. But to
say it was owned, you know, same point,
RFK Jr said long ago, the, quote, the
Palestinian people are arguably the most pampered people
on international aid organizations, which was absolutely despicable.
Like, just disgusting, and it's obviously not true.
It's a quite it hit quite a nerve
to tell your audience that RFK Jr is
great and then tell them he's being blackmailed
by Israel when it's was obvious all along,
this is the point, from his Zionist fascism
that Israel had something on him. Now, again,
whether you wanna say on him or not,
it's clear that he was blindly supporting Israel.
Maybe that he's just a Zionist. Maybe he
was being blackmailed. But I agree with David's
point that it's a little bit disingenuous to
say, you know, to we and because his
point is remember, Ian responded to us back
then saying we were being blackpilled. We were
blackpilling and, you know, we and he even
had the interview with Derek. Remember that. So
he knew our points. And so and but
he did say you were right at the
end of that video, but the problem is
now to come back around and act like
it's some kind of a bomb. You know,
the point is there was all the evidence
was there. But maybe Ian is finally seeing
that. Who knows? He goes, I'm so sick
of this constant contradictory BS. Now a lot
of people are calling it out. This kind
of, you know, breaking the news through the
proper channels,
whether he knows he's doing that or not
when it's something that we were all the
majority of the actual independent media was breaking
this down with with source material long before
we got here.
He responds.
He says, there's a difference between having evidence
and having correlation
based suspicion, David. Now it's fair.
He says, and you conveniently leave out all
the good Maha could and still might hopefully
do for our country. Well, I mean,
that's not fair to say. It's not that
tweet wasn't about you know, everyone the you
don't always include the counterbalance of the thing
you're talking about in every tweet you put
out there. Right? But I don't know what
David thinks about the potential positives, but that's
not relevant to the conversation.
And all the good they've done, I that's
a I'd made that point a second ago.
I don't think we can even remotely say
that they've done all this good right now.
There's a lot of things up in the
air and there's far too much obvious that
they have failed you on already. The mRNA
shots are still going. They did not roll
back pull back the COVID shot like Jones
lies about. They're currently promoting the twenty twenty
five shot for people over 12 and still
more boosters for people over six months, and
it's all still happening. And they're rolling out
an mRNA cancer shot. That alone destroys the
entire point. So let's even say they did
pull back the COVID shot. Well, too late.
They've already got an mRNA platform built into
his administration.
So it's just frustrating that we can't see
that and be clear about that. Maybe good
will happen, and I'll I'll side with you
on that. But right now, it's nothing it's
a lot of hype and a lot of
small moves that may amount to more good.
But it says, for being so wise, you
certainly do use the deep state tactic of
oversimplifying and character hack, hack, divisiveness,
an awful lot. And it's a it's a
well, I think it's clear that a lot
of people do today, including you, Ian, I
think, in a lot of points. It says,
and it's abundantly clear you're not particularly familiar
with my body of work while you do
it. I wouldn't agree with that. It's at
this point, what are you contributing? Not in
the past. Today, where what are you contributing
today? Well, that's
I think that's a dangerous way to go
seeing as how David Icke and his iconic
network are contributing
far, far, far, far more than most people
in this conversation. But it says, we are
clearly on the same team and if you
which maybe that's the truth, but I that
feels a lot like what Alex Jones is
doing when he was talking with David Icke
last time. Like, we're friends. We're the same.
He's like, no. We're not. No. We're not.
It was pretty embarrassing. It says, watch my
content and you would probably realize that, yet
all you seem to know how to do
is ride my coattails and half baked attacks.
So he struck a nerve, clearly.
Here's what Derek said. I think he is
right to bring this point up, Ian. I
mean, in our discussions on Monday, we both
acknowledge that RFK Jr was likely being blackmailed
based on his history, not only the twenty
twenty four accusations by Newsy and his admitted
history of womanizing, but also other allegations
and the odd circumstances surrounding his ex wife's
suicide and burial. There's a lot that could
be something they're using against him. That we
brought that up years ago or rather, you
know, I say we'll say,
this the reason I say it like that
is this conversation has been had before he
was running for president. The point is he
let's just make it post joining the administration.
We've all been talking about that. There are
older allegations against RFK Junior going back to
his '20 to to the February. They are
hard to find, but they're there. That's what
Derek adds. So, you know, you can see
that this is a little bit touchy. Right?
I mean, David clearly has identified in his
mind this person as an absolute manipulator. I
think it's very fair to consider that. But
I do think it's,
you know, it's interesting to see how this
is playing out.
Now here's a clip that Derek put out
that I wanna play. And this David Ick
said, bros is excellent here. Trump is a
deep state go for task with bringing MAGA
on board with what they would oppose if
a Democrat was in power. Now same as
always, the point is you guys can decide
for yourself. You think that is the case,
that's clearly what he thinks. I I think
at this point, it's the evidence is pretty
monumentally obvious that these people are
compromised by something. That's what I would agree
with. I mean, that's
I mean, it's it's unreal how many examples
we've seen of the exact opposite of what
they said wouldn't happen, or rather what they
claim would never happen rolling out right out
of the gate. How that's not enough? I
mean, even Ian pointed these things out.
But it says and they would oppose it
if a Democrat was in power, obviously. The
takeover of society by AI human fusion and
AI controlled dystopia. Look at the alternative voices
that get the big numbers supported by the
big tech algorithms and ask why that is
when those awake to the scam like bros
do not. Exactly the fair point to make.
That's not to say that I mean,
never is it to assume that the person
who is is knowingly doing so. Certainly worth
considering. Right? But I think that's biggest problem
today is people that don't know they're being
used. Derek, on the other hand, has amazing
work, in my opinion. You guys can decide
for yourself, but it's all very well sourced.
Same with us. Same with a lot of
us. And very few actually get to the,
you know, really I mean, even David himself,
who has he's a central,
monumental figure in independent media, and he gets
sidelined all the time by this stuff.
That's crazy. He's got more followers in the
world than most people, and yet he doesn't
even get the reach on his point. It
doesn't make any sense unless you recognize that
there is active suppression, which I shouldn't have
to convince you of that. That's provable today.
But here's a good clip of them talking.
I recommend you watch the full thing, which
is clip below or link below because it's
a good back and forth. And Derek, you
know, it's it's he's doing this is why
I respect Derek so much, more than pretty
much anybody, is that he is going at
this with honesty. He's not going at this
debate in, and he's getting a lot of
almost he's I think he's getting more hatred
from people simply for talking to him, which
is the same stupid point of assuming one
way or the other.
Obviously,
everybody you should have Derek is trying to
come to the conclude, Trump to the facts.
You know? Trying to suss out whether there's
more there or not, whether he knows it
or not, or just trying to find common
ground. Anybody that's gonna
demonize that, I think, is part of the
problem.
You can watch for yourself and see that
he's very clearly just trying to find the
truth in everything that's being discussed. That matters
to me. Do you feel
very good still about my vote for Trump
in the sense that
had we, like
and I'd be really curious your take on
this specifically.
Up until Trump's election, I feel quite confident
that all the presidents in my lifetime
were directly acting on behalf of this shadow
government. That most of them were even groomed
for their through that other
career for this shadow government and enacted direct
shadow government policies throughout their entire career. Up
to Biden being literally not even there. Like,
maybe even dead. We don't know.
And or at least I don't know. And
and so Trump I I still am of
the belief that Trump is not does not,
in my mind, seem to be acting directly
on behalf of the shadow government, but rather
seems to be acting as a businessman that
grew up around the shadow government that is
easily swayed by wealth and money, easily swayed
by deal making, easily swayed by So completely
personal opinion, which is fine. You can have
your own opinion. But, you know, all the
evidence clearly suggests that the same agendas have
continued. That's what I've that's the one thing
I've been trying to show people. All the
narrative is one thing, but if you stand
back and look at the many, many different
agendas or rather the, you the many administrations
that have continued the same central agendas,
those things are still happening. The same AI
direction, the same technocracy, the same bias. You
know, every part of it. Everything we've discussed,
I could rattle it all off. The main
things have not only continued, they've gone crazy.
So you could argue he doesn't know that.
That's fair to say he's being used the
kind of the same way I'm talking about.
That's something I've often considered.
But it's based on the idea that you
just choose to view it a different way.
That's all it really comes down to. That's
giving them the benefit of the doubt, and
that is a blind spot. I see it
everywhere. We all do it sometimes. It's not
unique to anybody in particular, but I think
it's interesting
that you how much we've already seen. And
this seems like the same kind of two
step that we saw before the selection process.
By big words and sexy big numbers like
Larry Ellison with, like, his big talk of
fucking AI bullshit,
which often makes it so that Trump is
acting on behalf of them. But I don't
see him as aligning directly with him. And
a lot of the a lot of the
actions he's taken, like dismantling USAID,
like going after See? That's the talking point.
That's not what happened. Even dismantling
is not accurate, but or the idea of
of the general point about how he's not
completely leaning into every single thing that they're
he is their man, guys. It's obvious. The
agenda is exactly what they wanted to accomplish.
You could look at what they were claiming
before he came into power.
Like Doge and just dismantling all these sort
of, like, integrated parts of our government that
are, like, objectively tools for this deep state
or shadow government. But what what what exactly
has been dismantled?
We've got a lot of talk and a
lot of statements and a lot of narratives
and web pages.
This is the problem if we're in a
situation where the narrative of how you're firing
the deep state is being fed to you
through data points coming from a power
part of the government.
Now, sure, that government
utilizing the infrastructure that we call the deep
state is somehow fighting that same infrastructure. Like,
it's certainly possible, I guess, but it seems
a little bit naive to be taking the
information from the government about how the government's
fighting the government. That's just me, though.
He's doing a lot of things that do
not benefit the shadow government
just on face value. Like what? Like what?
I would love to see an example of
something that truly translates out past narrative that
is actually fighting the law the real agenda
of the power structure.
Tim in the chat if you got a
thought. But then he's also being manipulated into
doing other things or he's willingly doing other
things that are on their behalf. And so
what I'm saying is that I'm still I
mean, couldn't you just reframe it the other
way? Couldn't you just turn around and say
that they're they're getting him to do things
that make it look like he's not on
our side, but he is because he's doing
all these other things?
Subjective. You can see it how you want
to. That's why we have to question everything.
We and the main point is with all
the evidence we do have that aligns with
their agenda should be enough to make you
go, he might be. And that's all we're
saying. He might be. And so consider that
as we go forward as opposed to giving
the benefit of doubt because he probably isn't,
which is the way they wanna see it.
Rather be in the media environment post Trump
as opposed to a Kamala media environment,
because I can't even imagine where we'd be
if Kamala was our president. Right? In the
exact same position. Now, but I'd be really
curious for your take on that
whole perspective because I think we disagree on
this, but I'm not sure.
Yeah. So I think it's totally bullshit, man.
Like, I and not not against you. Just
I I can't I can't buy that.
I think it's, respectfully, I think it's naive
to think that with all Trump's connections that
he's not I think well, for one, you're
correct that he's driven by ego. I think
that's true, and that's a great way to
manipulate a person. A person who is driven
by ego as much as people wanna give
Trump credit for, like,
he's the, you know, Teflon Don who doesn't
bow down to everybody and everybody bows down
to him. And, sure, I'll give him credit
in certain areas of posturing that way,
but we sure do see him bow down
to, Israel. I think it's debatable who's in
charge, whether it's Elon or him.
Obviously, the Adelson's.
I I wanna talk about Peter Thielen a
little bit and Doge. Yeah. So I'm gonna
hold my thoughts on that in just a
for a couple minutes. But
in general, that perspective, I do have, an
immense
difficulty trying to believe that. Now that doesn't
mean that he that we're not in some,
like, new territory and haven't been with Trump.
I believe, like,
without being able to prove all the pieces,
but I I've been saying this since he
first popped on the scene in 2016,
that Trump is
the new world order, deep state, shadow government's
literal Trump card. I don't think that that
is, like, you know,
a mistake, you know, that there that phrase
even exists. I think that he's here for
this reason to serve this purpose to
sort of,
you know, astroturf or collect the the real
freedom, truth, conservative, libertarian ish movement,
and bring a bunch of people in there.
Because despite you having a more nuanced take
with even though I do disagree with what
you just said, your take is still more
nuanced than the people who the Trump supporters
who everything that we just talked about prior
to this, you're willing to say, yeah. That
doesn't look that good. They're gonna just keep
saying, well, no. Who cares?
There are absolutely
cultish Trump members. I know that you see
them out there as well, and I think
it's worth, you know, just pointing that out
that they're definitely and I think in a
very dangerous way. Not to say that the
other side didn't have doesn't have their own
cults. Obama was probably the biggest left cult
left wing Democrat cult we saw. I don't
think Biden really had that same kind of
thing. It was more of like a motivation
by hatred of Trump. Lock your ears and
pretend it's not this bad. Yeah. Just like,
okay. Well, it's it's at least it's not
Trump, but that's kind of the whole thing.
I even see in the comments here just
saying, like, imagine if Kamala had won. And
I I think it's just such a low
level of thinking, not not to say that
this is the position you're taking, but when
if somebody criticizes Trump and the only response
somebody has is it isn't like to say,
well, let's debate this point about Israel or
about Maha or about the vaccines or about
what have you. It's just to say, at
least it's not Kamala. Like and and that,
I think, was by design. This is how
this system, how the pyramid of power operates,
that they create,
kind of enemies for to set up only
to knock them down. You know? So for
the last couple years, it's been like and
there has been some truth that the left
is going hardcore into transgenderism and open borders
and DEI and all this stuff. And so
you build that up, and then all Trump
has to do is come in and kind
of be the opposite of it. Great. Okay.
He did some executive orders about transgender sports
and, you know, men and women's sports, and
I know a lot of people celebrated it.
I think that's a common sense thing.
But that also is very easy. It doesn't
really require much political capital to do that
in the same way that freeing Ross Ulbrich,
which is something I celebrate and have fought
for since the day Ross was locked up.
I'm grateful that happened. I'm so grateful every
time I see Ross posting on, you know,
on Twitter, like, at the Grand Canyon and
at the beach and stuff like that. Trump
had a role in that. But,
I also think, again, it's not a move
that cost him a lot of effort or
time or money or anything like that. But
then I look at things like just one
example, giving the Panama Canal or helping, you
know, supporting Panama Canal being taken by Larry
Fink and BlackRock.
And I see the Trump supporters. Well, it's
better that we have it, not China. And
that's kind of a whole other
side conversation about collectivism and people, like, identifying
with the country or the politicians like, we
did that. Well, I didn't bomb anybody. I
didn't I'm not gonna necessarily benefit if the
US government allows BlackRock to bring in you
know, take control of a couple ports in
the Panama Canal. But people really identify with
Trump, so they deflect any negative criticisms. And
then something they see as positive, they sort
of talk about it or maybe even believe
that that's that they're benefiting in some way,
even if it's not necessarily inherently true. So
I just think that the the control grid
has set up these these clear false binaries
and,
Trump represents something new, like, where you've got
a lot of the movement. I mean, I
I know you've been on Infowars a lot
recently. I shared today on my Twitter a
clip from myself on Infowars back in 2012.
I was down there in 2011, '20 '12,
'20 '13. Right around the time I started
talking about,
Trump and, you know, being critical of them,
the Infowars invites stop, stopped coming. And, as
you know, a lot of people have left
Infowars over the years because of things that
they saw with Alex, David Knight, Aaron and
Melissa Dykes,
Kurt Nimmo, so many others who I think
are principal people who's just kinda got sick
of what they were seeing as, like, a
blind spot in the Infowars crew. To me,
that's emblematic of
not only a section of
an independent media, I'll call it mainstream alternative
media as Ike calls it, but also just
some of the audience that no matter what,
they're just gonna stand by their man. They're
gonna stand by him, and and I think
that's really dangerous.
Well said by Derek.
I agree.
Now you guys can watch the full back
and forth if you'd like. Eclipse beneath that.
I mean, I I don't know how you
know? And the point is that Derek's not
pretending we know for sure. But the reality
is, like I said, there's more than enough
evidence to have a lot of concern, a
lot of questions.
The problem is that far too many people,
even leaning in that same direction, are are
choosing to blind themselves to what they hope
is the outcome.
That's dangerous.
Now I'm gonna give you a couple of
overlapping kind of views on this just to
get different takes from people that gonna, you
know, kind of get you give you the
different sides of the people's how they're seeing
this kinda play out on the Internet. So
this this this person's a Midwestern doctor said,
Ian Carroll's allegation, RFK is being sexually blackmailed
just started trending. So did you know? He
recently promoted absurd and fake story about Tim
Wall's molesting kids. Now, here's the you can
go through this yourself. I mean, you get
a lot of this in the partisan field
where it's kinda like this might be happening,
here's what we're hearing, and and then it
becomes fact in the partisan field. That's not
his responsibility to, you know, how other people
frame the story, but you see how this
works a lot in this kind of ecosystem.
RFK sex scandal was known at the time
of the senate hearing but was not brought
up because it was completely absurd, it says.
You can decide about that. But the pharmaceutical
industry and their lackeys were desperate to stop
RFK Jr and dredged up every, possible allegation
they could to stop his nomination, but they
still didn't touch that because there was nothing
there. Now that doesn't sound accurate to me.
To me, that if they were going after
everything, they would've thrown that too. To me,
that seems like this was set up this
way,
maybe or maybe held back for the reasons
that actually add to the possible blackmail story.
But it says when the waltz thing happened,
many major influencers realized it had been a
hoax designed to discredit Trump campaign right before
the election as peddlers of misinformation. So Ian
Carroll's story was never amplified and called out
by large accounts
like, this one's, clandestine.
So interesting. Right? You that just didn't get
leaned into by the ecosystem that allows these
things to go viral, and so it didn't
happen. I think we know that's how this
works. And since I listened to Ian Carroll's
allegations this time and around and noticed they
had the same pattern. Rather than present any
substantial allegations, a variety of salacious things were
said to create the implication of something bad.
Point being that it's very easy to get
clicks and trend by making absurd or salacious
allegations, but it's not a good long term
strategy as it destroys the truth trust in
the alternative media. That's long since gone. That's
why it's the mainstream alternative media,
And it needs to compete with the mass
media. Stuff like this happens all the time.
So, normally, you know, you get that you
get the sense of what they're saying. And
this is,
top,
Toby Rogers saying, I like Ian Carroll, but
this endless click farming is annoying. Just Just
give you the feeling of certain people online,
whatever I think about it, just to show
you what people are saying. Here is
revolutionary blackout. And this is just, I'll show
I'm actually gonna play you one clip from
Candice,
more so about the
woke right, which I find interesting. But this
is the longer nine minute clip that pretty
much encapsulates some of the larger points from
her video. But the this is revolutionary blackout
just saying this RFK Jr blackmail story is
pure cope. RFK Jr was a hardcore Zionist
for years, and you idiot still supported him.
Now they're trying to save face, claiming RFK
Jr is only advocating cracking down on free
speech for Israel because he's blackmailed.
Just admit you were tricked by another Zionist
con man. Interesting. Right? So you can see
how both could make that arg one argument
is that these are people trying to manipulate
the Trump position, make them look bad.
But this is an interesting thing to think
about. I mean, look, I agree in a
large sense that the
okay. Let's put it this way. If unless
there's more that they haven't shown us, which
seems to be this kind of ongoing indication,
this subtle kind of more to come, they're
bit risk.
As far as anybody honest should could should
take that, it doesn't matter. It's meaningless. Until
we see something we can verify, it's all
just narrative. Okay? Sort of like the other
story that was not happening before that.
But my point is if this is based
on nothing but subjective, hypothetical, maybe,
well, we already had enough of that. There's
an endless amount of that and far more
approvable stuff before the selection process. This is
what he's saying. We knew this guy was
cut. So then if that's all it took,
this does seem like a little bit of
a, this isn't the only reason he's now
lying for Israel. We weren't tricked. Israel's got
him. And that's the point is that everybody
already knows that that's an easy sell because
Israel is showing itself to be one let's
put it this way. Zionism is showing itself
to be one of the most disgusting, dishonest,
dangerous,
manip like, manipulative,
surreptitious entities on the planet.
Now I'm not one to make that is
what you can see them doing. That's what
you can see them proudly having
conferences about.
Literally telling. I mean, I've gone over it
so many times. It makes me sick to
know people like that exist in the world
that are saying, I want, you know,
Qatar US, for example, when shown all the
children, they say not enough. We demand more
blood. That's what they said to the list
of zero children under one year old that
were killed in Gaza. They knew what they
were saying. That's why they deleted the tweet.
The point is it is clear what we're
dealing with, and that's not all Israelis or
all Jews. Let's be clear about that. The
point is that is there, and Zionism
is a huge issue.
So this is about trying to make it
the one thing they all know people won't
balk at,
if that's what you think is the case.
And it's a fair argument to make. Again,
because it seems to be nothing's really proven
at this point. Ken O'Keefe,
I'll play this clip for you, says she's
right.
Woke right want you to die for the
state of Israel and their wars and censor
you, Netanyahu types.
Woke left wants you to die on the
altar of self mutilation, open borders, and censors
you, Soros types. It's the same people
who play both sides and we do their
bidding.
Now, you can argue he's talking about Jewish
people. Maybe he is. I disagree with that
as the framing. I think it's obviously Zionism.
He maybe maybe I'm wrong. The bottom line
is
that is the way to be seeing the
picture.
That you have string pullers on both sides
of this that get you into the position
that the power structure wants you in. I
I am I mean, I don't even think
that needs to be convinced. That is the
what the evidence shows.
But that aside, I just wanted to want
you to hear what Candace Oas is saying
about the the largely, the Republican. I mean,
this is what's funny. I've got a lot
of pushback lately from highlighting what I think
you know, that gets framed as sort of
petty discussions, and maybe maybe it is. Maybe
I'm wrong. But I've been talking about some
of these people, Jones included, because I've really
started to identify more than just what I've
always said, but something more nefarious than usual
happening right now. Like,
turned into overdrive. Right? They've literally kicked up
the you know, whatever the analogy is.
They've put it into high gear to where
they're trying to manipulate you for something. That's
I can't stop seeing that. Maybe I'm wrong,
but that's why I've started to make more
effort to kind of highlight how this is
going. And yet I've gotten a lot of
pushback. Again, maybe maybe rightly so because of
doing so. But I want you to see
that there's a lot of people even in
the right, even people like Candace Owens that
have clearly identified the same exact problem. And
I would like to think that adds more
credence, especially coming from within their party and
saying these manipulators in the woke right are
constantly deceiving you. Listen up, guys, because they
really are as also on the left, by
the way. It is simply partisanship. It's how
our government operates.
You are all frauds,
and you're gonna get exposed. I'm telling you
one by one, you're gonna get exposed because
you're pissing me off now. Okay? I spent
all of 02/2024
having to fight you guys. You're like disgusting
little goblins. You operate all in the dark.
You lie. It's all it's it's you lie
like some people breathe genuinely.
These people lie like I breathe. It's just
natural. It's just like just like their lungs
expand and a lie comes out.
And there's a network of that, and Meghan
McCain and Ben Domenech have been a part
of that network forever.
Okay? Everyone knows who these neo cons are.
Wanna keep Americans drummed up, go to war.
These people who can't fight the wars, they
cry when someone points out accurately that they're
clinically obese. They can't fight the wars, but
your sons and daughters better fight the wars,
guys.
God forbid you have a person on a
platform telling you, no, this is stupid. We
don't need to be involved at BBNET and
Yahoo's Middle East BS and expansion policies. Right.
Okay? They don't have the people, so they
want you to be the people that go
die for it and are trying to marry
you to those ideas. Now just to be
clear,
there's there's plenty of things about her opinions
that I might disagree with. I guarantee there's
people out there that are already going, well,
she thinks this and that. And so therefore,
maybe you're maybe she's wrong about those things.
Maybe you're wrong about those things. This point,
regardless of all the other things, is important
to recognize.
It's almost one of the things that has
I mean,
most people that I talk to, whatever per
position they're in part politically,
are aware to some degree that the US
government is fighting wars for Israel. Or, again,
to be very clear, for Zionism.
Israel is just a is the is the
act is the central point for Zionism today.
Or, really, maybe that's shifting into The United
States. I genuinely think that. My point, though,
is that this is something we can't dismiss.
The evidence is overwhelming.
That's why Jeff Jeffrey Sachs has been getting
a lot of traction by simply laying out
the evidence, the books that Netanyahu literally wrote,
the many times he's literally stood up in
congress and said do this, then they do
it. And that's exactly what continues to happen.
And Trump is doing more so than that
more in that direction than I've ever seen
a president do and did so last time
with Trump Heights and Jerusalem. And, I mean,
guys, it's impossible to miss.
So whatever else you think you disagree with,
the point is it's interesting to see that
there is some alignment, whether opportunism or not,
across the board on this point. That's why
I think it's so telling that Jones is
out there trying to gaslight you away. You're
obsessed with Israel. Guys, this is the this
is a point in history where I think
I've never seen this
percentage, like, the majority of people in a
divided country who are clear about at least
one of the problems.
And that's why you should stand out more
it should stand out more than ever, those
that are trying to direct you in any
way they can away from the glaring, gigantic
siren red flag situation
that we all see.
In the classroom,
on podcast, via the media, and because their
relationship and your trust in media has been
fractured,
they now have to work on trying to
fracture your trust in people like me and
Tucker Carlson.
This is the new vibe.
And you know my thoughts about Tucker and
some often in this case too. I mean,
let's be clear. She seemed to give tay
Andrews at, Andrew Tate,
a a I mean, calling it a softball
interview would be insulting to softball interviews. Okay?
Same with Tucker.
I've got plenty of doubts. That doesn't change,
like I just said, the facts of what
we're discussing now. That's why it's always important
to air on integrity and outcome.
That that ultimately makes the person largely irrelevant,
guys. It's about what you can prove. You
look at the source material. If there's none,
you move on. Or, you know, you make
a note and you move on in case
something else comes up. So that's my point.
I I think Tucker Carlson's a manipulator. I
really do. I think that's pretty obvious. That
doesn't change the fact
that they're at least in some I think
it's opportunism from that side to bring this
over, but,
frankly, she has been doing a hen I
mean,
I don't even know how you could conclude
Tucker Carlson in this conversation.
He has occasionally pointed to some very soft
parts of that conversation.
Candace Owens, for whatever reason, maybe because she
really cares about it, has been knocking these
things out of the park around Israel for
a while now. So maybe it's about just
kind of clout. I don't know. I just
wanna point that out because I do not
think that's an an accurate way to frame
that. New vibe.
Oh, it's he Carlson.
This is the new vibe. Oh,
it's he sounds like an Iranian propagandist
when he says don't die in Iran.
Yeah. You know what that is? That's a
classic US government talking point. You're an Assad
apologist. You're a Saddam apologist. Guys, this is
not new. It's just new for the people
that woke up in 2020 and have
and politics started for them at that time.
The reality is if you look back through
this, same thing with terrorism and you and
efficiency movements and what they're doing today, they
repeat, guys. The same thing cycle. They give
the same speeches over. They give the same
it's that's what they do because they know
what works.
So if you look, they've been doing that
for you forever, acting like you saying x,
y, and z makes you some kind of
a a pro Iranian desk. You know, that
that's what they're doing to me right now.
You must be a Hamas support. You mean
Hamas that Israel funds? You know? If you
if you consistently
stand on actual fact and logic,
these people run.
I mean, you see in the conversations online
where they once you when when you when
they recognize that you're not trapped in the
two party illusion, most of them cut and
run because it's hard to argue with the
actual objective logic.
When he says that, obviously,
no person should send their kids to die
in The Middle East because this has been
our
policy, our flat line policy for the last
decades, and nothing good has come of it.
Literally, nothing good has come of it. They
can't even pretend anything good has come of
it. Look around. Look at your streets.
Look at your country. Is your country cleaner?
Is your country better for having fought Israel's
wars for decades?
See? Oh, that's anti semitic.
See, it's there's reason that this is why
more than in this conversation, she strikes me
as genuine.
But don't believe don't
just make it about the facts.
The reason I say that is because it's
it's an important point,
right, to to make the larger the larger
overlap. What does she say right here?
Oh, that you fought Israel's wars for death
streets.
Look at your con Yeah. Like, you know,
so you get a lot of the back
and forth of, like, the the political conversation.
Right? Where Democrats have the dirty cities and
Republicans are all great and, you know, and
and there's some level of truth to that
in some context, but it's that's just one
of the points. The problem is that when
you look at the full picture, the reality
is there's differences where you look at at
the end of the day,
what have we actually gained in any way,
in any material way, in in anybody's lives
based on what this this government has blindly
been doing for Israel for seventy seven years?
Seventy six years.
It's a good question. And if you actually
listen or you look and you it's it's
it's nothing. I mean, it is blind, one-sided,
always giving
at the expense of Americans
now to the point to where Americans are
literally feeling the removal. I mean,
as we talked about, the removal of your
rights or rather the lack of acknowledgment of
your inherent rights for a foreign government. It's
now coming to pass like we've been worried
about for quite a long time.
Now just in a general point, Jose says,
hey, guys. I think RFK may be getting
blackmailed by Israel. You never would have guessed.
I mean, it's just this weird that's why
I used that picture today. That was that
was the moment that really stood out to
me, the picture for the show today, because
that's when Arfke Jr. Was on stage
as the presidential candidate for The United States
Of America and and smoothly stood up and
fielded questions in his stead. Didn't ask him,
didn't look to him, jumped up and answered
for him when it was a question that
he was offended by. Can you imagine the
hubris of somebody like that to think you
can stand up and jump in front of
a leading presidential candidate's response?
That shows you something very clear.
He was had the upper hand in that
relationship
or something quite a bit worse.
That's that's the objective way to look at
it. It could mean nothing. It could mean
that Shmueli just is a pompous person that
felt he could do that because of their
relationship. But I think it's obvious that once
we saw this weird overlap and the many
times the Schmooly was acting as his handler
in conversations, that something shifted. We all felt
it.
Very weird.
But that doesn't prove. Right?
But here is one the other clip. I'll
play two clips actually. The one from that
everyone talks about, which is we've shown many
times, which is important because I don't know
how you miss
what this clear gap shows you, but also
the clip of him admitting to be in
Epstein's plains. None of that proves everything, but
it is an
important data point that suggests that there's points
of compromise.
I don't agree with that. But okay. Do
you have concerns about,
the the level of
Israeli influence in our our politics here in
The United States Of America?
I I don't know. I mean, I I
don't know.
I just I'm not, you know, I'm not
a politician
in political office, so I don't see much
of that.
Sounds a lot like Peter Thiel. I'll defer
to Israel because I don't know.
Very telling. Also, about a six second gap
between him answering that question. Pretty sure he
seems pretty confident about it now, doesn't it?
It's exactly whatever they want. And here's the
other one. Ever on Jeffrey Epstein's jet, were
you?
I was on Jeffrey Epstein's jet two times.
Not yet. So was Trump more than once.
Doesn't mean we proved something problematic, but it
certainly does suggest a possibility,
especially what we see today.
True blue petaled rebel says the blackmail of
RFK from Israel is about to become mainstream
news. We are the precipice of understanding. See,
this is my problem. The framing of this
is that's how that's how Ian was framing
it. Everyone seems to be framing this however
they want to, and nobody has any evidence,
guys. Thank you, Twitter files. Welcome to we
are the media now. It's not everybody. Frankly,
I don't even know if it's the majority.
It's this weird bubble that everyone's in the
lens that everyone looks through because that's the
only it's like this is the new mainstream
media. Twitter is the representation
of the new media apparatus today.
Where else do you get the I've said
this for so long. Before even Twitter or
anything else, where do you ever get the
representation of what they claimed the majority was?
Or any representation of a majority picture?
You know, some random account where they might
even if they have a million followers does
not give you that presentation.
So the only way, and I argue it's
always dishonest, is the corporate media, the government.
That's the largest apparatus they could present to
you, their polls and their media presentations to
the left and the right, battling each other.
So reality is we don't ever really know,
and we never really will
other than some real time thing they're trying
to drive us into, which nobody should want.
My point is, I think we a long
time ago surpassed that in a lot of
ways, and we don't know it like we
saw with COVID nineteen.
So the problem is
that we're at a point now where people
are kind of lumping, like, they're they've they've
taken that away and moved it into a
field where they're pretending it's now now it's
all independent. We're we've broken. We've fought we
beat the deep state. We won already. Right?
And so now we've basically people have been
tricked into the new version the new version,
and they're clearly falling for it. I don't
know if it's the majority. I'd like to
believe we're smarter than that.
We don't have the evidence almost every time
these stories come out, but they get subjectively
reported.
Let's not forget, like the CIA point,
even Mint Press News
in 2022 revealed that
former Israeli spies were working at top jobs
in media
and and and both social and corporate
as has been covered many times.
Facebook, Microsoft, Google, Twitter,
ADL overlap with that as well. We'll go
into that more in a second.
This has an effect. And some of the
newer people to this as even Ian again
again, for example, has made clear himself that
he's new to this
to the point to where he might not
be as on guard to the things that
we all see regularly.
But here's what we got before. Right? So
this is January 22.
Alice Jones says world exclusive inventor of mRNA
tech doc doctor Malone raises alarm over AI
driven mRNA cancer vaccines and his scar Stargate
program, even though he's basically just dropped that
after feigning concern about it and now it's
all rolling out.
My point is that, gee, it's almost like
many of us tried to warn you about
exactly this. And instead of caring, you called
us black pilled and made 10 posts about
how Elon Musk was saving free speech while
he was censoring for Zionism.
So the point is for twofold to show
you the free speech thing happening again. I
think that's kind of the go to. But
also that that's what happened before and it
seemed to have happened again. And even Ian's
calling it out. The fact that we were
all saying that.
And this is not about hypothetical stuff, guys.
It's about how often you can read the
room
based on past examples and what they've been
doing so far.
That's not even a guess. That's an well,
it get that worse as an educated guess.
And that's why I point to our track
record if you look for yourself. If you
want reliable information that's consistently ahead of the
game, I look for TLAB and the rest
of people. The I'll just say the independent
media alliance in general.
But so that's related to now because we're
doing the same thing now,
where we're being forced into a situation where
we're acting like now we're responding to the
narrative instead of how we already saw that
this is where we would end up. That's
what David was saying.
But so yet again,
the
the response is to, in a lot of
ways, lurch back into, Elon saved us. I
just find it interesting how often that's the
the the moment. Right? So same day, today,
he just randomly tweets out yesterday, I guess.
That's when it relates yesterday into today was
the main part of the story. Elon Musk
buying Twitter was one of the most significant
and important days in world history.
God, it's just cringey.
Free speech is alive and well. Here are
next. For no reason, just decided to screen
that at the Twitterverse. I'm sure you probably
know why.
I said, just meeting your quota? Cat turd.
Talk about cringe post. Yikes. Sure it is.
Like, as in free speech alive and well.
You know, in between the blatant censorship and
personal temper tantrums, Elon Musk, and the outright
suppression of content by the ADL that both
Elon and Yacarino have proudly admitted to, but
sure, free speech. I mean, this is what's
so frustrating for people that are just even
remotely objective.
Again, you can argue that he's say done
all the things, but to say he's saved
free speech or that this was the most
monumental thing in the history of the planet
is so dumb. It makes me pay it
hurts me. Like, it's even a waste of
time, but people are being led into this.
I'd like to believe people aren't civil. Exactly.
So funny. And this one says, it's so
funny how they all
circle around.
I agree. He's saying free speech and possibly
the election.
It's just kinda sad,
but interesting timing.
And this person points out, hey. Look. This
is the free speech on this platform. And
here's what he said.
He says, the last time I checked, we
babysit you, and he says, or I'll say
retards is the word he uses,
with everything. So we we we babysit you
retards with everything, he says. That's why we
want it stopped. He says, f y'all and
your endless wars, Islam and and Muaziz are
not my enemy. You won't gaslight me into
believing so either.
So basically saying that Muslim people are not
his enemy. Okay.
What's interesting about that is there's plenty of
woke
censorship that you might apply, but we're not
we're not in that time anymore. Right? I
thought we weren't censoring based on insulting words
unless it has to do with Israel though.
Right? Okay.
They censored
it.
And he says, why? You promote and amplify,
which he does. We I think we've even
talked about this. An account called retard finder.
Now you can't call someone retard, which is
the claim they're using. So it's just it's
selective application, guys. Really, what he's doing is
calling out their what he sees as their
agenda.
Right? That you're not gonna convince me to
hate Muslim people.
So whatever algorithmic decision, he goes, well, you
can't say that word. And even though Elon
does and he supports the account.
As always, the same point is it is
subjective,
which I don't I shouldn't need to prove
this to anybody. We've seen Republicans call this
out at least twice around the h one
b visa conversation. And what was the other
one?
I believe it was the election one, I
forget, where he just kinda freaked out and
censored people on his own platform. People that
were commenting underneath him. Even Loomer got censored
for a moment until she plead to them
and let her back on, and she's the
worst people in the world. But this person,
same thing, where it says, a Catholic chameleon
and a Jewish pervert doing the bidding of
the Zion Nazi regime or state, he says.
Okay.
You may you may be offended by that.
He doesn't say and here's the point.
If you were to come on his platform
and say a Catholic a Catholic chameleon and
a Christian pervert doing the bidding of a
Christo Nazi state, would that be censored? You
damn well know that it would not be
censored. So if you're not applying it logically,
then you're censoring people based on ideology, which
we damn well know that they are. Even
if you think it's insulting, the point is
if you don't protect the worst of speech,
you don't believe in free speech.
But this one I just thought was interesting
and the point of this overlap.
And, technically, this is about the
this could've applied to the part we might
get to about Teslas, but this is just
about the partisan blindness or people like this.
So on the March 24, cat turd, just
daily reminder, wear your Malaga hat proudly. Drive
your Tesla proudly.
Oh, look at this. Go back to, 2022.
Here's a different take. Just so you know,
Catdirt says, everything about electric cars suck, and
they're horrible for the environment.
It's not a way of the not the
way of the future and never will be.
It's a bad joke pushed by idiots and
it leaves morons.
Oh, well, back to today. Drive your Tesla
proudly because I was told to, and that's
my marching order.
Now sure, you could change your opinion, but
it's that means that you have
kinda hard to listen to somebody who can
go from saying everything about them suck. They're
bad for the environment. It'll never be the
way of the future. Only pushed by bad
idiots and elitist, and then they're great and
support them proudly.
Oh, it's electric car. It's the same thing.
But I guess you're swayed by the ideology
around it, then, yep, that exempt completely answers
my question.
This is the these are the million follower
count that are leading people into this Pied
Piper problem.
But so right now, as we're talking about
the Israel influence that is shockingly obvious, and
now it's even coming out through other stories
whether you believe the framing or not,
The reality of Israel blackmail through Epstein is
a undeniable part of the story. CIA and
Mossad were involved. That was according to the
intelligence from our government.
So the reality is to what or that
the question is to what degree? Does it
affect the people in the current administration? That's
a very fair question.
But meanwhile, same thing with the partisan field.
You're getting people like Laura Lohmer that keep
doing this, by the way. I just showed
you the same thing about a week ago
where she just jumps into the conversation
right as this all coming out and says
the Chinese infiltration gets even worse,
which I would never deny the possibility of
any government trying to influence or infiltrate another
government, especially not, you know, when it's the
US government or Israel. But the point is
that it should not be ignored.
But is there evidence to show that? Especially
if you're gonna
compare it to the overwhelming
ongoing
waterfall of evidence that shows you what Israel's
doing right now. But, of course, as a
proud Zionist, her own words, she'll never acknowledge
that.
And she says, it's a painful lesson in
why vetting is so important. Of course, she's
gonna go after somebody in the government probably
because of the support of Palestine, but it
says, I will be publishing the rest of
my findings soon.
Now let's just even say she outright proves
that somebody's getting funded by China.
That should matter. Right? Somebody should be that
matters of a foreign government is funding our
politicians. Right, Laura?
But you obviously know where I'm going with
this. It's insane to think that she's gonna
ever call out the overwhelmingly
provable advantage.
I'm not even talking about APAC. That's obvious
too. That's why our that's the JFK conversation
of trying to
make it register as a foreign agent before
he was killed, and it didn't happen. The
bottom line is that it is one of
the clearest things in this conversation even being
called out by MSNBC
that Israel through a pack and everything else
is straight up funding our elections.
Miriam Adelson. I mean, you can go on
forever,
but you will never find somebody like this.
There's a few of them ever calling that
out.
Have to ask yourself why. You can make
up you can decide for yourself.
That's why I said, hey. Look over there.
That's what she's doing,
in my opinion. Well, here's Nick's order doing
a similar thing, I think. So Massey comes
out with a bill,
a bill requiring that those running for federal
office are required to disclose all countries
in which they hold citizenship.
Obviously, that matters no matter where you're from,
which has been my point the whole time.
I don't care as as the ones like
Loomer try to make us out to be
racist against Jewish people. The point is we're
not talking about any religion here. That's her
that's their that's the Zionist shtick.
This is about other citizenship. So in this
case, it would be about Israeli or Chinese
or British.
Right? That's what we're talking about. And any
one of those things are problematic because it
presents a possible conflict of interest. It's basic
logic.
So he goes on to say, we should
even go further and and and ban
dual citizens. Hey. I agree with that. He
says, those like Elon Omar,
of course, who are loyal to Somalia, which
I don't even know why you
she has I've never seen an indication that
she is more loyal to Somalia than The
United States. Absolutely possible. And if it's the
case, then that should matter. Or really the
bigger picture is if she has dual citizenship,
then that should matter before you even get
to this point. You're not gonna this is
not some fake point to go after Israel.
I think it matters no matter what country
you're from if you've got dual citizenship because
it could influence your opinions.
But he makes this about
one per I mean, you obviously know where
this goes. And Nick Sorter, as I've called
out many times, is part of this manipulation
as much as many don't seem to see
it. That's my opinion. You can decide for
yourself. I simply said many Republicans, and there's
more than him, are currently doing everything they
can to deflect from the gigantic elephant in
the room, Zionism, which is what Massey's bill
is truly about, and you know it.
All dual citizenship should be the issue. Do
you agree, Nick Sorder, that Israeli dual citizens
should not hold office? Now I not like
I expected a response, but I guarantee you
that that will not be something they even
reference to. I hope I'm wrong, and I'll
proudly say it if it happens, but I
do not think that's the case.
So at the same time, just to show
you a little more of how this is
being played, you got Laura Loomer out here
trying to, like, randomly create woke left, woke
right kind of stuff by filming this you
know, remember, this is the woman. What's her
name again? I forget. Crockett or something.
Yeah. James Jasmine Jasmine Crockett. The one I
said last time was the ridiculous side of
the Democrat side. They're giving you the false
binary. Right? Where you've got somebody over here
making accusations about how everyone that was deported
doesn't matter. No rights. Who cares? That's the
Loomer side. Then you've got her coming in
and making
a at least one statement that's accurate about
how, yes, they've got rights, but then making
going into abortion and let me I think
that's by design or they chose her because
she wouldn't be able to articulate an answer.
Either way,
it's ridiculous to pretend like either of those
sides are the reality. Obviously, as we'll get
into in a minute, as the for the
umpteenth time, it's the most provable thing in
the conversation that, yes, even illegal aliens have
constitutional rights. It's insulting that we even have
to have that conversation every time. We We
just had a great conversation with Bruce Fine
from the Reagan administration, who is an expert
in the field of constitutional law and very
clearly laying out the obvious. And I shouldn't
need to make that point as it's roundly,
upheld by supreme court. It's roundly upheld by
every constitutional expert.
It's it's we're dealing with a bunch of
uninformed idiots who scream things because of their
beliefs that aren't actually rooted in the reality
of the very constitution they think they're fighting
for. My point though
is that this comes back to trying to
root it because the reason my mind goes
to that because that's the conversation I'm referencing
of her where she was on Fox, and
they were using her as the counterbalance, and
I think that's by design. My point is
that that's how this always works. When in
reality, all they're doing is miring you in
your left right paradigm hatred for each other.
But watch this video first. This is Lauren
Lauren Loomer is going
trying to create an entire she's already suing
this person. She's already got this in court.
They're already going they're wasting everybody's time. You
might you're wasting lawyer's time or you're probably
paying for it, but I've got you how
much you want of that thing I picked
up by some pack that's funded through Israel
or something like that. But the point is
clearly I'm kind of joking, but probably not.
Probably, who knows?
Is that ultimately, this ends up being
it it creates the false, like, the false
binary within the false binary. Right? Where
she is going after her because she attacked
her when in reality, all she did was
put her hand on the camera,
but that then creates the action that she's
trying to create. Hey. Let me play it
for you. You'll see what I mean before
I'm trying to explain this benign stupid video.
Sheldon horseman. Hello, congresswoman.
Horse manure.
Well, that sounds like fun. Yeah. Well
Wait. All these, like, new influencer
congress you know, it's all a bunch it's,
like, basically, the influencer
social media field has, like, become our congress
or it seems to be going that way.
Oops, wrong
button.
Crockett. That ain't the will we're allowed to
do. What it sounds.
Congresswoman Crockett, you're recently on a Tesla takedown
call calling for violence on the twenty ninth.
To be here, right? Would you like to
clarify your comments?
Good luck. As you can see. Congress, will
will you condone by will you condone violence
at the
Okay. Here's what's funny to me.
They're suing them for assault.
That's the woke right for you. They're just
as juvenile and stupid as the woke left.
The point is he literally continues telling you
the question.
So he pretty clearly was not assaulted. She
put her hand on the camera lens, and
they're making everything else up, wasting everybody's time,
and this is what the people like Laura
do.
It's dishonest. It's disgusting. It's manipulative. And that's
why they'll cry
foul about January 6 being called an insurrection,
which it shouldn't be because it's not, but
then go and call the smallest thing in
response or in in, you know,
a couple of people sitting in a library
in insurrection and swear to god it's the
case. It's just that these people are the
ones that are manipulating everybody, and they may
not even know it. Frankly, I don't think
Laura is smart enough to realize that she's
being used this way, but she either way,
it doesn't matter to me. I said the
woke right. And now Nick jumps in and
says, the US Capitol Police have referred the
assault case against Jasmine Crockett to the US
attorney. She's absolutely cooked. God, it's so childish
and silly. I just don't know who supports
these people. It's so childish. Everything about this
is so juvenile, but this is what they're
pointing to to get you mired in this
conversation.
When in reality,
much bigger things are happening in the world.
Sal Diagoras says, by their own admission,
tomorrow marks five weeks the Trump administration has
been sitting on the Epstein client list.
How many arrests have been made?
Why can't we see the list?
Where is it? Who is possession of it?
Why is no one asking these questions? That's
a good thought. But don't worry. We're gonna
we're gonna sue Crockett because she put her
hand on your camera as you manufacture outrage
for partisan manipulation.
It's this is this is what those people
should be screaming about if they mean anything
they ever say.
We're gonna we're gonna go after the JFK
debacle that meant that didn't change the story.
We're gonna highlight Epstein information, didn't actually come
out. What about DC Draino? What about little
TikTok? Where's all the binder information you swore
would come? My god. I don't know how
these people keep getting influenced over the conversation.
Now talking about the real elephant in the
room, Zionism.
The thing that they will never really call
out, not not me, if at all, not
an artist. Because the truth is that it
is the scourge of our times, guys. This
is the problem we're all dealing with whether
we realize it or not.
Craig Mokayper. Israel has peppered Western countries like
The US, UK, Switzerland, Canada, and others with
Israel proxy cells that function as today's brown
shirts, I e, harassment groups like Qatar US,
set up to punish any human rights defender,
journalist, student, professor, or public figure that dares
to speak out on Israel's atrocities like they're
doing to Palestinians
to a much more severe degree. The direct
collaboration of Western governments with these groups and
the mobilization of law
enforcement on their behalf
is a threat to every decent person.
They must be exposed, opposed,
persecuted prosecuted, excuse me, where possible,
and held accountable
in course of law and in public discourse,
fight this fascism.
Hundred percent.
He also adds on the twenty eighth,
he says darkness is falling across the globe.
He says, in my four decades in the
international human rights movement, he's a human rights
lawyer,
I have seen much cruelty in all corners
of this world, but I have never witnessed
the kind of unmitigated
evil
demonstrated today by political Zionism.
Adherence of this ruthless, hateful, deeply racist, and
fundamentally violent ideology are now in power in
the lawless United States government and that of
other western governments,
putting us all at risk. They are not
and see see just to pause, guys, this
is why I'm so adamant about this.
There are plenty of people and plenty of
other countries around the world that are very
aware of what a serious risk this has
become. Because it it's gone from violent rhetoric
for manipulation to the possibility that Israel will
use these entities to create real conflict, and
that was always on the table. But, obviously,
if you know that that's the way it's
going down, they're much less
they're much less reserved to use
somebody else to accomplish the outcome.
But he goes, they are not only torturing,
raping, and slaughtering innocent Palestinians, all of which
is now verifiable through Israeli media,
bombing and occupying several countries,
corrupting governments across the West, arresting and deporting
human rights defenders and students in The United
States,
harassing those who dare to speak up, and
dismantling our democratic institutions,
but they are tearing down international law
and the very principles of human morality itself.
No blind force since the Nazism of the
nineteen thirties has represented such a grave threat
to the world, and you could argue that
we're dealing with the same threat.
Either we defeat it or it will destroy
us.
Thankfully, Jews, Christians,
Muslims,
atheists, and others around the globe are indeed
standing up in record numbers, this is what
I'm telling you, to fight this evil. And
that is the light we must work to
spread.
Guys, how from the beginning of this, the
first couple of months of this, this is
what we were really feeling.
The massive global movement that they very clearly
just I mean, really what we saw
was a massive global movement of both the
youth, but a lot of other people that
were they spread like wildfire. And that's why
they mobilized the whole Jew antisemitism the, you
know, Jews speaking up against antisemitism conversation in
the Columbia University and the rest. Right? But
they then created the pushback and made it
all antisemitism.
Didn't really work, but it got enough of
it to kind of deviate the conversation.
And now we can just see that no
matter how much momentum we had, the governments
are either too compromised, too blackmailed, or too
Zionist to care,
which is insane.
But this is what we've been seeing. And
now we're a year plus into this ongoing
multistate genocide.
Caitlin Johnstone.
We're gonna come back to this discussion in
a second, but she says, I have said
it before, and I'll say it again.
Zionism
is the single greatest threat to civil liberties
in our
society.
Now, I mean, good luck trying to call
her a racist, guys. Definitely on the list.
She's a democrat, self professed,
very much an ad advocate for human rights
like like myself. I just make sure I'm
very clearly I'm not a partisan element, guys.
I don't partake on either of the sides.
But the point is,
the best they can do is go, you're
racist. You hate Jewish people. And you could
look it takes a half a brain cell
to look at how often and how long
she's been fighting for against all of these
things, all racism.
So that's how flimsy, that's why this is
failing.
Because she's calling this out. It's not about
Jewish people, it's about a political ideology that
is killing people.
Zionism is the single greatest threat to civil
liberties in our society. Israel's Western backers are
stomping out free speech throughout the Western world
to silence criticism
of a gen genocidal apartheid state.
It's that simple.
Now, just to include some important points,
it's also, I think, very relevant to the
point about why we could argue we're fighting
the same thing to recognize that even as
Herets reported
in 2023,
the Lehigh party, Zionism, that's that's the one
of the foundational parts of the beginning of
Zionism.
Lehigh party continued to seek an ally with
Nazi Germany even after the final solution had
begun,
as in the holocaust.
If you do not know this, ask yourself
how that's possible. As it says,
transcripts of Zettler's interrogation were released, this is
Paretsky, to the public last month, this was
in 2023,
by the Israel State Archives, including information on
the dark chapter of Zionism's
history, its ties with Nazi Germany.
We will communicate with any military power ready
to hell ready to help with the establishment
of the Kingdom Of Israel even if it's
Germany. So that really puts a stick in
the spokes to the whole argument that they
were there to or rather that they were
created
to never again against the thing that they
were literally allowing to happen or working alongside
as long as they got what they wanted.
Because that is the reality, guys. Zionism's
military orgs effort to recruit Nazis in the
fight against the British are revealed. That's that's
for you.
Right? Here's Dan Cohen. The Lehigh party
continues to seek an ally with Nazi Germany
even after the final solution had begun. And
there's evidence in their own documentation about trying
to align themselves with Stalin,
really just any fascist element that would give
them what they wanted. That's why they were
attacking the the British. The British are the
ones that gave them to the Belfort
Declaration,
Palestine.
All very clear.
Herzl himself was was an was an atheist.
That's the founder of the of of Zionism,
guys. This is very clear stuff. This
been shut off and ignored for a long
time because people were afraid to be called
racist.
You could read about it for yourself.
So you can't pretend this is built against
that even though they were literally aligned with
the group that was carrying it out. Seems
pretty simple to me. Now this was one
part of a conversation we had in 2024,
Zionism versus Nazism,
Israel's connection to extremist ideology, and the ADL's
history of faking Nazi marches, like provably, called
out by even our media, even our government,
caught faking Nazi marches using the ADL. It's
very, very real, guys.
Dan Cohen and I had a conversation. I'll
play a clip from him in a second.
The manufactured Middle East plate and the Zionism
linchpin.
I had two different interviews with Zachary Foster.
He's he has a PhD in Palestinian history.
This one's called the documented and suppressed history
of Palestine and Zionism.
This one was called Zachary Foster PhD interview,
the true origin of Hamas and the decline
of apartheid Israel.
Also, I had a great interview with David
Ike about Sabatianism,
Zionism infiltration of Judaism, weaponized migration, and the
weapon and the mainstream alt media. This is
really important. We add this in 2024
to what's currently happening in the alt media
as well.
But here, let me play a clip of
Dan Cohen speaking about Zionism. And I said,
is Zion is or this was posted by,
Jason, who, by the way, Basler, who I'm
gonna get him back eventually once we get
some more funds rolling in to get more
clips going. But is Zionism the only ideology
that feeds off the hate of hate and
use it to reinforce its existence?
We discussed that with Dan
Cohen. Perspective. Right? As Jewish person yourself and
what you've talked about in the past, the
two sides of it. The aggressive misrepresentation
of Jews in this conversation around how Jews
around the world or, you know, the in
my opinion, very clearly is a is a
Zionist ploy in and of itself. And on
the other side of it, the complete disregard
for what Zionism truly is
when peep basically, people saying it's racist to
point out what this political organization is doing.
So kinda go at that however you'd like.
I just want your thoughts in the audience
to hear how you view this. You know,
what is Zionism? Why is this important to
what we just discussed today?
Yeah. I mean, I think I think it's
actually extremely relevant.
And you really can't understand
what Israel is if you don't understand you
know, you can judge it by its actions
and you can look at patterns, but you
have to understand
its ideology in under in order to understand,
you know,
where it's going, what it really is. You
have to understand the what what what, animates,
its actions.
And
it is not
a it it is not you know, obviously,
Israel is not a normal country, and that's
not because
it's ultra aggressive
or has so many weapons.
These are, you know, it's or or because
it bombs babies and, you know, even. Those
are symptoms. The occupation, the genocide, these are
symptoms
of,
the the real the real fundamental issue, which
is Zionism. It's its its its ideology.
And
I think, you know, one of the
sort of I think we're seeing a number
of kind of psyops.
I think, basically,
more and more
people are
you know, when you when you basically have
the the
what Zionists believe or what Zionists claim that
Zionism
is Jewish self determination
or is, you know, Israel's the state of
the Jews,
is Israel is a Jewish state,
then
as people and and, you know, in The
US, basically, it looks like everything that the
US government does and Europe does is for
Israel, a k a the Jews.
Then
some people
will say, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. We have to
support them because look at what happened to
them. You know? Look at the holocaust. Look
at all the historic persecution.
They're our closest ally. You know? This is
what we hear all the time, from both
political parties, and, you know, they're surrounded by
terrorists and all these things.
But people more and more then
begin to understand,
wait a minute. What are we actually getting?
How does America benefit
from this? From,
you know, basically helping, quote, unquote, the Jews
by doing this stuff for the Jews. The
the Jews, if we accept the Zionist definition
that Israel is the Jews,
well, then,
they're actually sabotaging us. They're getting us into
more and more wars that we don't benefit
from at all that actually endanger us.
We're sending more and more money overseas.
You know, we're not helping the people here
in our country. And look so look what
the Jews are doing. This is like Jewish
influence. That is what that's kind of the,
I think, the psyop the other side of
the psyop.
So
as long as so, basically,
like, on x,
since Elon took over I mean, really, since
the the Gaza war
started,
there is a huge, huge, huge amount of
accounts. And I, you know, I kind of
bookmark some of these tweets
Mhmm. That are, you know, openly antisemitic
that just, you know, the Jews, the Jews,
the Jews all the time.
And they're capitalizing
off of what Israel is doing and the
and and the Zionist conflation of of Jews,
and it's, you know, and Israel or and
and Zionism.
And the thing is,
this actually serves Zionism
because,
it it maintains the basic
Zion it reinforces
the basic Zionist definition
that Israel and Jews are synonymous.
So, you know, Elon Musk early on when
he took over, he said, our policy,
is going he he said, we're not gonna,
you know, overtly censor unless, you know, there's
calls for violence.
What we're gonna do what did he say?
It's, freedom of speech, but not freedom of
reach. Right. So
if if, you know, Elon Musk, who is
works with the American the the Anti Defamation
League, the Israel lobby outfit,
to,
works with works with the ADL and is
close with Benjamin Netanyahu and is a Zionist
himself.
If he didn't want or, you know, whatever,
the real powers that control x,
did not want
that to be out there,
that stuff would be,
shadow banned or silenced or Most definitely.
You you you would not be able to
see I mean, it's just viral. And this
huge there's there are a number of very
big shady influencers,
who, you know, promote this stuff all the
time constantly.
And I really think this is actually well,
objectively,
it serves Zionism
because Right. It it,
you know, it reinforces this paradigm that Jews
equal equal the state of Israel. Can I
say one one thing real quickly just to
add to the point? And so the point
being is that they that what he's trying
what he outlined right there is really important.
So that Twitter clearly has been censoring people
saying from the river to the sea, Right?
Or free Palestine. We have examples of that,
but yet then allow overtly, you know, Jews
do this, and they're controlling that. And so
his point is that there's no way you
have you can pretend that that's not an
allowance kind of situation. And not only does
it allow, you know, it can continue the
conflation as you're outlining. It's what Zionism wants
that perception to be, so it use it
justifies its existence through that illusion. So go
ahead. I just wanna make sure that was
Precisely.
Precisely that. And so it's, you know, it's
Zionists
don't
care if you like them. They actually,
want you to hate them Right. But only
in the correct in in in a certain
way. They want you to think that they
are Jews or they're acting out of Right.
Judaism,
or, you know, they're following the Talmud or
something like that.
Because then that's where they derive their legitimacy
from. Then they can say, well, you're an
antisemite.
You know, you just hate Jews.
The Holocaust happened because of people like you.
And, you know, there's a long history of
that, and this is, you know, this is
persecution of us. When in fact,
the
so so so, you know, that so that
serves their agenda for you. They feed on
hate.
Very much so.
Now, obviously, that's important just because it's objectively
you know, the the reality is clear of
how that's being used. But Dan, as a
Jewish person himself and an
excellent researcher,
has I've, you know, I've I've even just
watched his evolution around this topic as post
October 7 and very clearly identifying how this
is being used, but also very clearly has
the courage to call out at a very
difficult time what Zionism actually is because he's
honest. That's important. That deserves a lot of
credit.
So to go through a couple important points
here about what we're seeing in regard to
Israel. Okay?
Right now, this is what we're talking about.
So we're talking about this entity that is
quite literally influencing the outcome of US policy.
And this is and not only that, but
effectively stopping that apparatus from even identifying
what they're doing right now in real time
to I mean, even American citizens in some
situations. But let's we're talking about the Syria.
We're talking about Gaza. We're talking about Lebanon.
We're talking about I mean, even more than
that, there's different examples we could make, but
just to keep it to the overlapping current
Middle East discussion.
All of those locations are being
there are people being bombed, children being killed,
people being starved. I mean, you could you
could include Yemen, quite frankly, seeing as how
Israel has adamantly I mean, they even just
called out the whole signal thing saying they
were mad because their information got released,
basically proving what we were saying, which anybody
paying attention already knew, that it was Israel's
war.
But here is what Saeed Mohammed Rondeh points
out. Watch the Nazi occupation force in action.
And this isn't Gaza, guys.
This is in Ramallah.
I do have people bursting into a bakery,
jamming this person's head in the in the
food he's making, beating them up. No justification.
This happens every single day. Every single day
in the West Bank, in people get beaten
up just for being Palestinian. And look, even
if you wanna claim that, maybe they broke
the law. Okay. That doesn't necessitate violence without
any kind of immediate, hey. We're here to
arrest you. Put your hands behind your back.
Like, you it's it's amazing the amount of
sides that people get when they call themselves
the only democracy in the least and then
hold zero accountability to any of the metrics
in by through which we make that allegation.
I should I think allegation's appropriate. I think
democracy is not what you want, but the
point is this is what they live through,
guys.
Now here is the Red Cross
telling you what's been going on. Just one
one of an endless amount of examples about
how they are kidnapping people that are paramedics,
bombing ambulances. Remember when that used to be,
like, back and forth? There was a narrative,
and we debated it for weeks. Every day
this happens, and nobody cares because it isn't
new. It just got it was just new
to some people that weren't aware of it.
But the controlling power structure has been aware
of it for a long time. And as
long as they can put you back to
sleep, Israel will keep murdering people with no
consequence.
Five days of silence.
Five days of fear. The Palestine and the
Christian society is once again awaiting a news
on the fate of our ambulance teams.
Five days ago, a PLCS ambulance came under
fire while it was on its way to
evacuate wounded people in Rafah.
More teams rushed to save both civilians and
our injured colleagues. They were besieged.
They were attacked.
Contact was lost.
The silence is unbearable.
Since the beginning of the war, 19 PRCS
members were killed while on duty.
We cannot bear to add more names to
this tragic lust.
PRCS
holds on the international community
to take serious measures to protect our medical
teams.
You you have to realize there's not an
allegation that this is somehow Moss. They just
don't care. If pushed, I'm sure they would
just may say, oh, they're Moss. And your
blind Western government wouldn't care. That's probably why
they don't even bring up an excuse because
they know no one's even challenging them. But
the reality is this never stops. They're bombing
hospitals. They're bombing mosques. They're bombing churches, all
of which are indeed provably happening.
In Push, they'll just make a narrative.
But the reality is the evidence by investigative
groups, by human rights groups, by doctors on
the ground is that you can see everything
and prove that they're lying about it. Prove
that they're lying about it.
Hala points out, they coordinated with the Red
Cross.
They went in to save lives. Israel executed
all 16 of them. Ambulance crews, first responders,
then buried the bodies and destroyed the vehicles.
This isn't self defense. This is a war
crime, a massacre, and the world is still
silent.
Execution of 16 ambulance workers
following their coordination with the inter International Red
Cross. And this is how this works, guys.
That means they talk to them, they talk
to Israel, and Israel says, okay. We know
you're coming. You're good. Go ahead. And then
they bomb them, kill them, rape them, torture
them, whatever they do anyway.
That happens all the time.
I mean, if they're gonna literally
square up on Indra job in a car
by herself and open fire, which that has
been definitively proven,
then you know these people are absolute monsters.
And let's not pretend like each one of
these are just individual choices. Some of them
may be, but we can see the consistency
from the leadership that this is why it's
going on. They are targeting anybody trying to
help, anybody trying to save, anybody trying to
repair, anybody trying to feed. They're bombing everything.
Everyone in the world knows this. It has
any gumption, any constitution,
any integrity
because it has been proven, and I don't
use that word lightly.
Jonathan Cook,
journalist himself, says this isn't a run of
particularly bad luck for Israel of eighteen months
of committing an accidental war crimes. The war
crimes are the goal. Killing medics, killing journalists,
killing aid workers, killing children, wiping out entire
families. That's the point. If we had any
honesty in our governments,
you this is like pretending there's not collapsing
athletes when the numbers are so much more
than anything we've seen in that time period.
You can argue it's not the shots. Sure.
But we need to address why kids are
dropping dead. Right? Nah. It's not the thing,
so shut up about it. That showed you
something. Right? We knew.
Not that we knew exactly. I think we
all knew probably what it was. We didn't
know. We knew that there was a problem,
though. We knew that because every study,
FIFA study, soccer study, everything I showed you,
you could prove it using metrics. The numbers
were shocking 10 times more than they ever
were in those month periods. Nobody cared. Okay.
Same thing here.
We know this.
Just compare the amount of children, the amount
of every metric you have from this entire
situation. And if you shy away at genocide
because you're a coward, that's fine. Let's call
it war crimes. Are you gonna pretend like
killing this many children are not war crimes?
Starving deliberate deliberately starving people is not war
crimes? Target I mean, you can go on
forever.
It's by design, and your government's a part
of it.
Eight unrestaffed. But I guess that doesn't matter
because unra unra is Hamas. Are we still
just pretending that makes sense despite the fact
that even The UK and The US said
you never proved that? And all we get
is morons like Tom Cotton screaming the same
narrative because they're funded by Israel. Guys, this
is insane that they can just murder UN
workers. Even if you wanna say they're Hamas.
Obviously, it matters that Israel funds Hamas. Right?
No. No. We don't talk about that. But
let's recognize that even if you claim they
are something,
they don't these are being executed while in
an official position.
I mean, this is like somebody going in
as a a politician of another government, having
them execute them on the ground and say
they're Hamas.
Okay. Then
in in every case, by the way, that
should be something they prove, but especially when
it's something in official position. Right? They should
say, here's the evidence. They never do that.
And every time they do this, when they
try to about Unruh, they get proven to
be lying. That's why they just don't even
try anymore.
If any other country Ryan says did this
they would be held accountable.
And you know that even if they were
lying about it.
This hospital they bombed the Almas or hospital
or no on us excuse me or wait
was that
the SAAR hospital. And I forget which one
we that's frustrating. The one the one that
we just recently discussed, they bombed. Right? It
was a big story for this couple of
days because they've just they targeted these people.
They executed doctors.
The point is what you're seeing here
is raw random raw footage of the of
that location twenty hours before the video, before
they bomb the hospital.
And this is what you're gonna see every
time, guys, because everyone is sheltering these places.
Children, women,
disabled people.
They were trying to give these kids some
semblance of life.
Now
most of them probably died because they were
in this building when it got bombed. I
hope that's not the case.
Saeed Mohammed also points out,
Zionist rapers and child killers have bombed a
school in Southern Lebanon. So it's not just
Israel, guys, or rather
occupied Palestine.
They're bombing hospitals in Lebanon.
In what world would any other government, any
other person, anything, anywhere else be able to
get away with this?
How do you not see what that shows
you?
Now this
is just an ongoing this is a a
minute and forty three seconds long.
What you're seeing here, you can independently verify
for yourself.
One minute forty seconds long.
50,021
full names,
IDs,
date of birth,
08/1976
of them are under the age of one.
15 thousand six hundred seven of them under
the age of 18.
This is just the what they can prove.
Now you wanna tell me how you can't
independently step back? Like, this is how this
will go this way the further this goes
forward, unless Israel can somehow annihilate every essence
of this from the world that we can
prove that they knew these were all innocent
people.
The reality is when what other world do
you get a complete identified,
meticulous breakdown
of names, IDs? Because look. You wanna see
they're lying? Then go through and prove they're
lying. The reality is you can cross reference
this, and they are showing you who they've
proven are killed.
These are Hamas members. Most of them are
children.
The problem is this will never get regarded
by the obviously dishonest power structures of the
world today. You're not gonna get this about
the people they claim they're killing.
You're not gonna get this in any other
context because it just doesn't happen.
Said also points out the Zionist regime, their
high court in Israel, just ruled that the
international law international law does not apply to
the war in Gaza, which that shouldn't be
shocking to you. We've talked about this many
times.
Here's just a quick search on Brave. The
Israeli Supreme Court has ruled the international laws
of war just simply don't apply in Gaza.
Perfect, right? That makes sense. Why not? If
they can just investigate themselves and say we're
not guilty, why don't just go, you know
what? None of it matters. Stop bothering
us. Apparently,
this, again, shouldn't be surprising.
We've talked about this many times. I'll show
you that in a second. Here's Ben Max
Blumenthal's point.
After a full this is, Nev Gordon saying
after a full year, the petition submitted March
2024,
Israel's supreme court rejects appeal to allow humanitarian
aid to Gaza,
claiming
that, quote, the IDF and the respondents went
above and beyond to enable the provision of
humanitarian aid to Gaza.
And it goes on and list a bunch
off. The point is they're ruling on their
own side that we don't have to give
them anything even though they're legally required to
because of the obvious reality situation, because of
the removal of people from occupied territory, the
fact that they have the right to return,
doesn't matter how long that goes on. And
the fact that they've never been allowed to
is why they are getting aid. It's simple.
They could give back what's legally required to
be given back and the whole thing would
go away, but they don't want that because
that's the whole point of it all. They
covet this territory.
Max says Israel's Supreme Court, regarded by Western
liberals as an enlightened bastion,
ruled in favor of starvation of Gaza as
a weapon. It did.
One justice described the war against Amalek
as obligatory.
Amalek being a biblical reference to annihilating everybody,
including children, obligatory obviously means they're required to
do so. But let's keep pretending like we
don't know they're publicly committing genocide.
All Israeli state institutions are mobilized for genocide,
he says. Israel is irredeemable.
Now let's not forget.
You can read this. This is whether whatever.
If if you're willing to just oh, shit.
It doesn't matter. And, yeah, it's on Mondeweiss,
which is just like some of these people
will blind dismiss. The point is you can
read this directly from their document or harratz,
which I've already gone through this personally many
times.
The point is that in this discussion, they
publicly say, and they've done this more than
once.
Israel says it's allowed to ignore international law
anywhere at once.
This was the it was in a conversation
of the West Bank, and these people stood
up in the Knesset and ruled aggressively that,
look. If we can violate the law anywhere
in the world, why wouldn't we be able
to in West Bank? That was their argument.
And I've gone over this many, many times.
There's literally a document directly back to a
prison a Hebrew document for the Knesset. It's
all easily verifiable.
Here's what I find interesting. So historically, they've
made that argument.
They recently just ruled again,
like we just showed you, that that they're
not that law doesn't apply to Gaza.
Here's what I find most telling. This is
from yesterday.
So the difference is what you what they
say amongst themselves. Right? What Netanyahu says to
people over there and then the way they
present to it in English to the American
audience that somehow isn't able to cross reference
those things.
Here's the difference. Here's what they present to
you over here. Israel flouting international law with
forced evacuations in Gaza, says the UN. Not
that part. At the very least, they're at
least going there breaking the law. But it
says the UN
accused Israel on Friday of violating international law
because of their mandatory evacuation orders, which is
the same as always. They're moving them around,
bombing them wherever they go, it's torture, guys.
A year of that, by the way. These
evacuations, it says, failed to comply with the
requirements of international law, like every other part
of what they're doing.
Now it says Israel's permanent mission to to
Geneva
told Reuters yesterday
that it was operating in accordance with international
law. Oh, they which is what they say
on the shows. Right? Quote, Israel's evacuating civilians
to protect them from a lost terrorist who
relentlessly use them as human shields. You know,
the same old tired response even though we
can prove that's not true. And we've got
40,000
examples just since October 7 of Israel getting
caught using human shields even to the point
to where they publicly acknowledge the new one
called mosquito procedure. Guys, it's insanely obvious. My
point is,
in front of their own people, they're going,
law doesn't apply to us. Gaza doesn't count.
But then when they speak to the western
audience and they go, we're following the law
that we just convinced our own people doesn't
even matter.
This is how insanely stupid this all is.
They're in front of you or rather the
media that's gonna lie to you about what
they say, saying that we all follow all
the laws that you all think are supposed
to matter. And then they stand up in
front of Knesset and go, why does this
matter? This law doesn't apply to us.
That's what's going on in Israel. I'm I'm
talking about Israeli leadership.
And then you get stuff like this from
the supposed journalists that are being completely influenced
in this country. Alan McLeod says, behold, the
dumbest take you've ever seen in your life.
Michael
Grove or the was it the, what's it
called? The
was it JC? The what's the I forget
the platform. The Jewish something, commission or something
like that.
The article reads the title reads, the IDF
should be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.
It says, thank god Israel had the courage
to sometimes ignore the most powerful ally.
Right. Nobel Peace Prize. So that's, yeah, the
dumbest take you heard in your life. They're
committing genocide. The whole world knows it, but
let's do it. And this is my point
about the reactive Israeli propaganda.
Instead of just going,
let me convince you why they're not committing
a genocide. They gotta go, no, no, no.
They're doing the best ever.
More pinpoint targeted than ever. They've got more
food than they've ever had their lives. Right?
It's just it's it's dumb. Like, you
you should've
just cut your losses and been like, not
that bad. You know? Instead, they gotta go
the best ever. Here we are. IDF should
be nominated for Nobel Peace Prize while they're
committing genocide.
Now
Ryan Grim
makes a good response to this and it's
kinda the same point.
So Elon Levy, if, yeah, he does still
exist, which is insane. He says how it
started, how it's going. And he shows The
Economist. And I do think it's an excellent
point actually, not in the way he thinks
it is though. They put out the article,
this is Israel alone.
Why? Because that was the thing they were
doing at the time. That was the naire.
They were still pushing the aggressive propaganda because
Israel was supposed to be the one attacked
and we're all the one and we're the
victim. And that that's the media followed suit
like they always do. Then
the writing was on the wall. Right? After
a year of genocide,
even the most ardent Israel Blind supporters were
opportunists. They all are. And so they go,
well, shoot. We got us we can see
everyone's leading. And then the next article is
Israel's hubris.
Not Israel's genocide, mind you. Just here's why
Israel went too far.
That's that's and that's milk toast compared to
what's going on. Of course, he wants you
to think that's because they've, what, been compromised,
changed their mind. I mean, I don't even
know what point you're trying to make, bud.
But Rachel Ger says, sometimes you just can't
win as a Jew. You mean aside from
the one, the first one that was what
you wanted? So, how does that make sense?
So, and says, wait, I think we have
a word for that. Oh, you know what
she means. Anti Semitism.
I mean, it's just lazy.
I I actually don't think people like this
even realize how lazy and stupid they sound.
Here's what Ryan Grim said.
Yes. I can't think of any reason the
world might have turned against Israel other than
bigotry. Right? They must just hate Jews. He
goes, your country has blockaded all food and
medicine from reaching a civilian population that was
once 2,300,000
people. And I'll add also to your own
people that were there that you pretended you
wanted to save. Right? He goes, they are
now resorting to pet food.
And it's 2025,
not the fourteenth century. You can't starve a
civilian population in 2025 and also ask to
be celebrated for it. And that's you could've
gone so many other directions. My point is
that you have this obvious game. That's what
Dan Cole was just talking about. Oh, it's
you just can't win as a Jew. What
who even mentioned Jewish people? See, is Elon
Levy is trying to make it about that
in everything he does. They work off each
other. And her argument is not that they
just murdered children, raped people, and proudly displayed
it, have been caught lying a hundred thousand
ways over, but just because the economist must
just suddenly now hate Jews even though they
did it before.
Yeah, you got evidence? Nah, nah, just you're
scared of that word, so run away.
It's dumb, like it's embarrassing.
And Ryan Graham's going, yeah, maybe it's because
you murdered people, but nah, we must just
hate Jews.
It's almost cartoonish how that even used to
work. That's not to say that there might
not be an overlap. I guarantee somebody out
there does and may also think the point
because Israel. Doesn't change the fact that it
is because Israel.
But here is another doctor we pointed out
more than once.
He is now speaking again about I'll I'll
show you couple of stories I think are
important.
Trita Parsi says, any if any other country
did this, the, quote, West would lose its
mind
and go to war.
Now, not even a condemnation.
A Palestinian orthopedic nurse was shot in the
knee by Israeli soldiers. And you've seen that
this is this is, forget it says his
name in the beginning. I forget off top
of my head. He's been calling Seffa for
a while now. He's still in Gaza. He
saw a nurse get shot right by him,
and think of the courage of this man.
He says, for refusing to stop operating on
a patient they were working on. He's later
taken prisoner by the Israelis for forty five
days. When the Israelis confirmed he isn't Hamas,
they took out his eye, dropped him on
the other side of the border, forcing him
to crawl for three kilometers. That's just somebody
that they find out isn't Hamas. Yeah. What
does that show you?
They hate Palestinians
no matter what. And if you you can
go ahead and retort with because look at
watch what happens October 7 because you're stupid
enough to already not know, maybe you don't
care that Israel killed more people on October
7 than anybody else. But that's facts. I
I know that's not part of
the
game. Doctor Perlmutter,
I know that you treated a local health
care worker by the name of Tamir.
Yes. Can can you tell us a little
bit about him?
Sure.
And this story will argue against the,
accusations
that or the the claims of,
the IDF that nobody was targeted. No innocent
person was targeted. Tamir is an orthopedic nurse.
He was in the Operating Room closing a
wound after a surgery,
when an Israeli soldier came into another hospital,
not the one we were working in. This
is a hospital that was already occupied by
the IDF.
They ordered him to abandon the patient who
he was closing the wound on.
He refused to do so. So he was
shot in the knee. His proximal tibia bone
or his shin bone was sent across the
room.
He was obviously unconscious
from, that assault. He was then operated on.
He recovered the next day, consciousness.
The next day, he was taken prisoner by
the Israelis and taken into Israel to an
Israeli prison.
He was handcuffed.
He was blindfolded
for forty five days. He received absolutely no
wound care.
He was fed a juice box by his
report to me, sometimes every day, mostly every
other day.
And then on the forty fifth day, after
they discovered that he wasn't Hamas,
they let him go by dumping him on
the side of the road or the other
side of the border.
He crawled for three kilometers.
His wound is now horribly infected.
As a goodbye present, they gave him a
rifle butt in his right eye. They blew
out his globe,
meaning that he's blind forever.
And he crawled and was picked up by
a passerby
and was brought,
to the hospital where we took care of
him.
Okay. So he was tortured.
He was starved, tortured,
totally abused, received no medical care, and and
initially shot when he didn't have to be
shot for doing his job delivering health care.
And, again, we should note that CNN has
reached out to the IDF for comment on
this. Obviously, we can't
independently verify
these these allegations
and the disturbing,
description that that you just provided us.
Yeah. Yeah. You know, the opposite of what
they do in any other conversation about Israel.
Right? When it when the IDF comes on
and makes all these grandiose lies that we
can prove our lies, they never say that.
Well, we independently
verify what you just said. Obviously,
you're having a live interview with somebody you
can't I mean, it's just insane the kind
of watering down they do. The man literally
saw it
and has been constantly highlighting these things. He's
I mean, it's just gross.
You must be able to see what this
shows you.
Here there's another clip I wanna show you,
and I'll include my thread of 40 plus
doctors all telling you what they've seen in
Gaza. All of it is overlapping in the
same conversation. Rape, torture, murder, human shields, on
and on and on and on. This is
the one I played the other day. I
just think it's relevant because of how
this isn't it's it's crazy what this person
what they're doing right now,
it seems more severe than it even did
in the beginning, which I don't even know
how that makes sense unless this is not
even just about October 7.
Orthopedic surgeon colleague here who was,
taken out of the Operating Room. His fingers
were crushed.
They showed him a picture of his wife
from a spy, not not from a magazine
or an old photo, and,
and they had a a metadata and said
it was taken the day before,
up close and said we're gonna bring her
here in front of you, and and we're
gonna gang rape her in front of you
if you don't admit that you're Hamas, or
we'll keep breaking your fingers. Right. So if
you we're forcing you to admit that you
are Hamas
by threatening to rape your wife. So that
means they know you're not. They're they're they're
working to get numbers. They're working to create
an illusion so they can share a video
on Twitter about a guy commit to pretending
to admit to be Hamas, and all of
the same right move screamers online that you
know are gonna point to that and say,
we knew it. You're all Muslim supporting. Right?
Whatever. You already know how this works.
You have to and we it's it's easy
as to point back to the beginning, which
you can currently self prove for yourself.
All those clips they showed you of those
trembling
Palestinians in white clothing that were saying, yes,
I raped that girl, and now, yes, I
did this.
Well, we now know as a matter of
fact that none of that happened. The guy
said, I have, you know, babies in the
oven. They're all on video. And what did
the same people do? The same Tom Tom
Cottons and Mark Rubio's. They screamed that we
knew these people were monsters
even though we know as a matter of
fact, none of that even happened.
Even Schumer just literally repeated the 40 bedded
babies again.
We're being lied to from the highest levels
of power.
Either they're Zionist or they're blackmailed
or, you know, some level around that, guys.
There's no way to misunderstand this.
He still didn't admit he was Hamas, and
they said, well, then we're gonna send a
drone to your bedroom window and incinerate your
children, and he still wouldn't admit he was
Hamas.
They beat him every time he, asked to
speak to a lawyer, beat him twice as
hard when they after he spoke to his
lawyer. And he spent eleven months in prison,
having probes inserted up as rectum by by
female
IDS met members who said that were the
probe was soaked in pork blood.
God.
That's just so rough.
Well, not as if we didn't already know.
This is a new one from today.
K? This is the independent
inside Israel's torture jails. Funny how they've been
screaming about torture
torture tunnels or whatever they keep talking about,
rape dungeons. I mean, it's as always, it
seems that's them projecting what they're doing. And
even they have zero evidence of any of
that stuff coming from the side of a
mosque. Never to say that's not possible,
but anybody objective can clearly see that there's
no evidence. They've not everyone they've released has
said that they kept them 12. They fed
them. They they protected them with their own
bodies.
And here we have the actual torture prisons,
the actual rape dungeons, what they're pointing to.
Israel's torture jails where Palestinians held without charge
tell of brutal treatment. I'm not even gonna
read through this because it's the same repetition
of all the stuff you know is happening.
And they're beating people with no reason. They're
raping and torturing and starving and everything you
already know about. And now even the independent
is covering that.
And, again, not like you didn't already know
then. We talked about this November eighth of
twenty twenty three, a month after we were
in horrifying cases of torture and degrading treatment
of Palestinian detainees.
This one is BBC from 08/05/2024.
Blindfolded, bounded, beaten. Palestinians tell of Israeli jail
abuse.
Here, human this is the United Nations from
July 31. There's hundreds of these. UN report
Palestinian detainees held arbitrarily, secretly, subjected to torture,
mistreatment.
Here's the B'Tselem, leading Israeli human rights group.
Welcome to hell. Talking about said Tianan, the
rape can't the rape dynamic
and the absolute hell these people are put
through because they're Palestinian.
Now, just in case you didn't know, still
to this very day, this is today, these
are Israelis
in Israel
protesting for Israel to stop the genocide, holding
up pictures of dead Palestinian
babies
And Palestinian children, kids,
young teens, just recognize that this as much
as people, especially on the screening right, don't
want you to recognize this, I keep telling
you. There's a rapidly growing grouping of people
in Israel, but all around the world, Jewish,
Israeli, or otherwise, who are calling out what's
going on. As it says, now in Tel
Aviv,
we, they say even we, killed more than
15,000
children.
Stop supplying the genocide.
So you have to acknowledge this, guys. These
are people in Israel who are Israeli Jews
who are protesting against their killing of Palestinians,
not just because they wanna stop the killing
of their people who are there. That's a
huge part of, I think, the majority, but
there's groups that are fighting for Palestinians.
Stop. Don't let the world lie to you
about these situations to carve you into one
of their narratives, one of their subjective partisan
sides, or just one of the assumptive areas
of this. It's bigger. It's obvious what's going
on, and people are waking up.
Now we are at
just over three hours.
I'm a I wanted to go I'm gonna
play you a couple of things on this,
and I might just leave some of this
for tomorrow or the next day. But I
wanna make sure we highlighted some of this
to at least get one part of this.
And this is in regard to the because
I've I've actually done a lot recently about
specifically the deportation.
I mean, it's it's a very important story.
But I put it on the batter latter
half because I definitely or the end because
I feel like we've talked a lot about
it
and covered it pretty strongly, I think. But
truly,
it is terrifying, guys.
It is a
what if not the one of the largest
attacks I've seen on this country's inherent rights
in my doing this. Now this is from
March 26 year, more unconstitutional deportations and the
rapid decline of American liberty.
And there's I went over four or five
new ones that were pretty wild.
Almost all of them except one were legally
in this country.
I think predominantly green cards. I think one
of them was a Visa, and they were
all just deported because they simply supported Palestine.
One of them simply wrote an op ed
years ago about Israel
committing genocide.
Here
is an actual quote. This is actually what
they said
in Trump's state department.
We'll revoke the visas of whoever it is
that fits within the category
of what it is we're deciding is going
to get your visa revoked.
What did I tell you guys? The same
circular logic of the government is all it's
Obama bombing people. If you're there, you're a
combatant because you were there. It's the same
dumb stuff they always do, leaning into your
biases.
Let's be clear.
It even if everything she says is the
case, the point is even if they're a
terrorist, even if they plan that, you have
to prove that. You have to give them
due process to vent the present the evidence
of why you claim the other thing they
are. And if they are, then then it's
easy.
You don't even need the new a the
Aliens Enemy Act. You can deport them right
away because they're committed crime. Right? See, they're
trying to create this opaque circumstance to give
themselves the benefit of the doubt without presenting
any evidence.
Because they know you'll buy into it because
you already hate these people for some of
them. The truth is whether or not they
are what you say they are,
everybody gets that due process, and that's what
they're
trying
to
manipulate
you
on.
But that will revoke the visas of whoever
it is that fits within the category of
of what it is we're we're deciding is
going to get your visa revoked, which it
That's precisely what you said.
No. No. Everything means nothing. Nothing means everything.
Right? We will decide
to deport you if what we're doing is
what we wanna deport you for fits within
what we've decided is enough to get you
deported. That's what she said. That means nothing,
guys. It's illegal activity, essentially.
Right. And they get to decide what is
and is not illegal. That's just like every
other circumstance.
That's not how this process works. Let's let's
even say fine. Let's just even say that's
how it would work. You are still supposed
to present the evidence. That in what world
are you not required to prove your claims
against somebody for anything, especially deportation, because that
is
under
Reno versus Flores, supreme court ruling is in
in particular
deportation cases.
And, I I I I do know that,
from our own
conversations here
that
here we go.
The department, I can say this specifically,
revokes visas every day in order to secure
America's borders and keep our community safe, and
we'll continue to do so. Yeah. Okay. Right
there. Fine.
In every one of those cases, you're required
by law, the law you swear an oath
to,
to prove those things. And the the fact
that anybody in this country pretends like that's
not just the most benign expected reality in
a country that pretends to follow the law
and people's rights and be the better presenting
example for the world. Guys, that's exactly what
we all know this country believes it is.
For them to just go narrative, no matter
what narrative it is, then no matter how
much you believe that narrative, even if it's
all true, you can't just go narrative, that's
why we don't have to do the thing
we all know we're supposed to do. It
is required by law.
So the deportations you the visas you remove?
Yeah. Do you you have to show here's
why. Here's the evidence.
Remove it. Okay. Simple. Takes half a second.
They're not doing that, though. That's the point.
And now being caught for how we can
prove that the many, if not all, are
not actually what they claim they are. And
that's why. That's why they create the the
the act to
circumvent those things or at least pretend they
can. That's why they declare certain groups terrorists
to pretend like that then meets what's necessary.
None of which is being proven, and that's
the real point of the holdup with that
judge.
Now they're going I'm I'm probably gonna talk
about more in the next show. They're going
after it like crazy. He probably is very
radically active. The point is they're going after
his daughter now saying she's worked on it.
Look at the conflict. Even if all that's
true, it does not change the reality that
what they're simply asking for is that you
prove that these people are part of those
gangs.
And all they do is they bend over,
jump they go go out of their way
to make up this whole loomer style narrative
to go that's what they're doing.
I don't care even if all of it's
true. It matters, but not in the context
of whether or not they are required to
give these people due process. It's simple.
Because the process is ongoing, the number of
revocations, as I've noted, is dynamic,
and the department generally does not, provide statistics
on visa revocations.
And, generally, we were not gonna add anything
at this time. But so no information on
how, when, or what, or when. But just,
you know, trust us. We're not gonna give
you any details. We're not gonna tell you
when or how or how long. That's what
she just said.
You know, national security. Clearly,
this is a process that we are committed
to and is part of making America safe.
Again. As soon as, don't worry. We're doing
it for you, so shut up. Then, and,
we're it's within our right. It's within the
right of every sovereign nation to make a
determination
who will,
stay in this country. He'll be allowed in
this country. And the secretary, of course,
has been very clear on this. Yeah. Yeah.
Except you left out the part where though
you're allowed to do all those things, but
you are required by law to prove the
claims you're making. It's so simple. And this
is how this game works right now, especially
in the partisan right, where you create these
abstract
narratives of web conflict and ultimately,
the point doesn't change. It's all distractionary.
And much of it is real and relevant.
This is not relevant to the point we're
making now, which is that you have all
of those rights. You can deport who you
want in the context of proving that they
violated some law. That's even what they're saying.
Right? Even though even though they're not doing
that with the the the Khalil side of
this, where they just go, well, he promoted
well, that they're
really trying to say promoted Hamas or terrorism,
and none of those are true. They know
they have to do that because they don't
have any understanding because that's and that's why
they made it about terrorism so they can
point back to old old precedents around deporting
people who actually carried out terrorist acts.
They're they're grasping for Israel, guys.
The bottom line is again that they have
to provide evidence of these claims.
And we we can go over this in
so many different ways, and I've done this
already. And it's just exhausting. We have to
keep doing it, which is this, and I'll
just go right to the point. This is
one of many, but this is I think
this is important because it was a conservative
justice, Sekolia.
It is well established, he writes, in Reno
versus Flores, nineteen ninety three, that the fifth
amendment
entitles aliens
to due process of law in deportation proceedings.
It's not it's not even a contentious point.
It's very easily proven. Constitutional lawyers around the
world are speaking up about this. People that
are not partisan
are very clear. This is typically typical
typically how that works. Here are just some
other screenshots, but it comes from you can
just look this up for yourself. I mean,
guys, if you type this into Grock or
anybody, they will say yes, obviously. That's the
reality.
The constitution protects all people living in The
United States regardless of immigration status. Most constitutional
provisions apply based on personhood, not citizenship. In
other words, if an individual is physically present
in The United States, they are entitled to
the protections granted by the constitution.
It's just exhausting the partisan game today.
Now here's another clip. This one from yesterday.
Aaron and this this is the person that,
highlighted the very rightly so, by the way,
that the early on in the Venezuelan discussion,
rather the Venezuelans deported El Salvador illegally,
the point and that's realize, illegally, even if
they broke the law. That's how this works.
You are required to prove those things. And
we're not even talking about, in this case,
illegally being here because the one we're discussing
was had already been given asylum and then
didn't have a criminal record. So they, in
every possible way, illegally deported him for not
even any reason.
Just claiming he was part of the group
that he seems to not even be a
part of and is now trapped in some
concentration camp in El Salvador possibly forever because
it doesn't seem that people even leave that
place.
But he simply highlights, let's set the record
straight.
Ramesa
Ozturk, we talked about, has never been charged
with a crime.
Mamun Khalil has never been charged with a
crime.
Mahmoud
Tal has never been charged with a crime.
We didn't talk about that one. Badar Khan
Suri has never been charged with a crime.
People are being deported left and right for
ideological
reasons,
and they're not even trying to hide that
anymore. They're saying they they wrote it off
in about Israel. They protested against Israel's genocide.
So they're not even trying to manufacture anything.
What's kicking people out of the country who
are here legally?
How fast that all happened? And at the
same time, while he's floating the idea of
removing you know, I almost wonder if he
floated the idea of removing Americans to El
Salvador because of Teslas to distract from how
crazy this is.
I mean, I I'm not in any way
I mean, I am very much concerned about
how that might even be what happens next.
Wouldn't surprise me, but it's worth thinking about.
Right? Because even I very quickly jumped at
the idea of Americans because of the that's
crazy. And meanwhile, I know we talked about
this too, but it's overtaking that part of
the conversation.
The secretary
also addressed this a couple of times on
the trip.
He, he was asked about certain numbers
of visas that were revoked.
He said he didn't know,
but that we'll revoke the visas of whoever
it is that fits within the category of
of what it is we're we're deciding is
going to get your visa revoked. Would And
she laughed right there. Do you see that?
Because she said it again. Actually, I think
this is the first time. She laughed because
that's idiotic.
So, basically, you're not even answering. You're saying
we we've decided what we're gonna we we
decide what gets you revoked. And if you
meet one of the things that we decide,
then we'll revoke it, and we get to
decide what it is. So everything we want
will be applied when we want it to.
It's very stupid. And she even smiled when
she said it. He said he didn't
know, but that will revoke the visas of
whoever it is that fits within the category
of of what it is we're we're deciding
is going to get your visa revoked, which
is illegal activity, essentially. Ah, okay. And that's
why, as he says here, she lied and
she did.
Aaron says,
state department spokesperson, Tammy Bruce, just blatantly lies
and says the students are getting visas revoked
for illegal activity. That's the point. It's not
true. Now we're not talking about the Venezuelan
conversation.
Because remember, their whole point is, and most
of them are accurately
they were correct. They were most of them
are illegally here,
which does not change. That's the main point.
They still have the right to due process,
and that's the reason they were illegally removed.
Nonetheless,
we're talking about this is important
here. Khalil,
Ozturk, the ones that were removed
while they were here legally.
And what do they say? They're Hamas supporters.
Well, even then, they admitted there was no
crime committed. And on top of that, that's
not even true. You could prove these
things. So they're lying, guys, and you have
to see. That means they know what they're
doing is very, very sketchy.
They didn't they weren't charged with crimes. That's
why they're even saying Visa, set a green
card for Khalil because they're trying to make
this consistent. They're gonna fail unless I mean,
look.
You know my opinion. I feel like there's
much more coordination across all paradigm. It's a
larger government manipulation in that in that sense.
Maybe none of it will change because they
all are doing the same thing. But
at some level, somebody will break. I believe
that. That's opportunism. Somebody at some level, even
especially, I don't think every pure judge everywhere
is all in the same mindset.
This can't stand.
In every possible way, this is easily proven
to be false. There has to be some
honest person out there willing to take this
to task. Maybe Aaron will do it.
Now here's what Rubio said.
And that's what Caitlin's pointing out is important.
She goes, be clear. Rubio isn't just saying
noncitizens have no right to write op eds
criticizing US foreign policy. He's saying that US
citizens
have no right to read those op eds.
The government is blocking US citizens from hearing
political speech and critical thoughts. Now people can't
seem to grasp what she's saying. She's not
suggesting he said that. What the point is,
functionally, that's how this calls comes out.
He's saying these people aren't allowed to write
what they want about this country because they're
here on visas even though that's shockingly stupid
and wrong. What she's saying is, in effect,
you are he's stopping you from being able
to read what they wanna write about this
country while they're here. That's the same point.
Nonetheless, what he says is wrong.
Because he's trying to tell you, and it's
the same excuse they keep giving, and he
just kinda came talks to the end of
the clip, which is that if they would
have told us they would do this when
they got here, then we wouldn't have let
them. It's a it's a it's a straw
man. Because let's be clear, what they're claiming
they did, they didn't even do.
Oh, I think I hold on.
Yeah. I did forget to grab that. So
what I mean by that
is obviously what they're saying is these people
are, you know, Hamas supporting terrorism. That's not
true, guys. All of them. They can that's
why they never were charged with any crime
because that's easily charged with a crime if
they were really doing that. Right?
But so all he says
is implying that they did those things, that
they somehow violated some trust by not admitting
that they would do that when they got
here, but they didn't do that.
And even then, the argument that you're somehow
gonna come and be like, I'm gonna commit
terrorism. And so you're gonna, oh, well, you're
not you.
It is a it's a straw man, guys.
It is a scapegoat. It is the most
one of the most dishonest things in this
conversation because they know what they're doing. We
can all prove that because they're getting caught
by everybody, but this is the kind of
excuse they give to gaslight some group of
the population, largely Republicans, into pretending that they
can just ignore your rights when they make
up a narrative.
And how you don't see that's gonna swing
back around on you. Mister secretary, a Turkish
student,
in Boston was detained and handcuffed on the
By the way, most of them, including her,
are I think she was the doctoral student.
They're either just going for their doctorate
or our PhD students or our actual doctors.
And so that larger point I made the
other day, what is the real point here?
Have we just lost sight of the idea
of what the argument was is going after
criminals and people as a drain on the
system? It it weirdly has reverted into going
after the most educated and influential people speaking
about Israel.
Gee. Who didn't see that coming? Street by
plainclothes agents. A year ago, she wrote an
opinion piece about the Gaza war. Could you
help us understand
what the specific action,
she took led to her visa being revoked?
Okay. So let's remember. The question was what
was the specific action that she took?
Yeah. And what was your state department's role
in that process? Oh, we revoked her visa.
She's a it's an f one visa, I
believe.
We revoked it, and here's why. And I'll
say it again. I said it everywhere. Let
me be abundantly clear. Okay? If you go
apply for a visa right now, anywhere in
the world let me just send this message
out. If you apply for a visa to
enter The United States and be a student,
and you tell us that the reason why
you're coming to The United States is not
just because you wanna write op eds, but
because you wanna participate in movements that are
involved in doing things like vandalizing
university. Oh, okay. So now it's just being
involved in movements that go on to do
oh, so you knew that.
Right? So these these groups have stated charters
that say we're gonna go vandalize buildings. No.
And, frankly, most of the things they're pointing
to are not what they claim they are.
Right? And and, of course, not the Hamas
antisemites they claimed, that most of them are
Jewish organizations. But you can prove that these
are peaceful sit ins that get are not
what they claim. It's it's embarrassing that they
just keep going forward. But even then, what
are you actually saying? That when you come
into this country to apply for a visa,
you're supposed to write down that you wanna
work with groups that vandalize or that you
that you're supposed to know that or it's
all so stupid and and abstract.
Even then, it doesn't make any difference. Just
because you didn't write down that you do
something later does not change the fact that
you're here and have rights. That's what what
he's trying to insinuate is that you somehow
violated that original contract, and that's why there's
no process necessary.
It's just it's a lazy argument that they
think might hold up in court because of
some probably politically invested judge. That's how they
all work.
But the idea is that even if they
were, they still have the right for that
evidence to be presented.
And he just he just brushes over that,
talks for the entire time, and doesn't even
answer the original question. He's harassing students, taking
over buildings, creating a ruckus. Didn't do any
of that. You a visa.
Gotta be clear. She didn't do any of
that. None of it. She wrote an op
ed, and she's not even part of this
con she didn't go into these protests. She
wasn't even part of this. She was somebody
who wrote an op ed who was going
to different school, and they just arrested her
because she's an intellectual speaking out about Israel.
And all they can do is conflate it
with an entire mob of people, many of
which didn't do any of what he said.
That's not how this supposed justice system is
supposed to work, and we all know that.
If you lie to us and get a
visa and then enter The United States and
with that visa participate in that sort of
activity, we're gonna take away your visa. Okay.
How how about she didn't lie? How about
she
thought and and later did those things even
though she didn't do them, understand? Just for
the sake of argument, let's just hypothetically say
she changed her mind once she got here.
What happens then, Rubio? Are you gonna be
able to prove that she knowingly lied about
committing vandalism ten years later?
I mean, how dumb is that? Because you
realize what he's trying to squirm his way
out of is that they still have constitutional
rights.
So you would have to prove that if
even then, if you pretend she violated the
lie on her visa, that doesn't change the
fact that you still have those rights. So
it's a lazy argument anyway. It's playing on
the ignorance of dumb people.
People that hate people because they've been primed
to.
As she says, he's not saying non citizens
have no right to do this, but he's
telling you don't also don't have the right
to read their work.
Now Glenn says, it's so telling that a
PhD student writes an op ed calmly criticizing
Israel, and so many people say, how dare
she come here and attack our country?
Get her out.
Well, he has a reminder for you guys.
Israel is not part of The United States.
It's not a US state. It's not our
colonial master. Israel's a foreign country.
Funny how that works out. People can't recognize
that. Here's the actual you can read it
for yourself. It's
very well done. It's very clear. None of
it even miss out Hamas. It is about
genocide,
law, reality. You can read it for yourself.
They're simply saying that this school has to
acknowledge this,
and you could disagree with them. But to
pretend like this is in any way, not
completely within anybody's constitutional
rights
or if even to call this against Israel
is not even accurate. I mean, it's just
so wild. They're simply calling people. They're saying
they have to divest from Israel because of
what's going on.
And they referenced South Africa and the same
thing they did during apartheid South Africa that
was praised by everybody.
Now it's different. I wonder why.
You can read it, guys. It's insane. They're
trying to make this into be terrorism support.
If this is terrorism support,
then, I mean, I'm sure like, think about
the kind of things that the US governments
are doing while they're committing a genocide. Or
any how about Saudi Arabia and all the
things they're doing in Yemen? Like, the idea
that we can see them gushingly supporting these
things, and that's not supporting terrorism, but they
simply say, we disagree with the legal reality
of what they're doing. And they're like, oh,
terrorism.
These are the terrorists who are trying to
gaslight you into going against their enemies.
Now he just gives you that to read.
You know, I think I'm gonna leave it
there,
go into some more. This goes into the
anomalies calling out the the the woke right
on this, saying they're getting lost
by the like, basically, right now, Trump and
Israel are forcing the IHRA definition of antisemitism
on Columbia School, and they're forcing it in,
which if you don't know, is about conflating
like, saying that you can't you can't call
out Zionism. You can't criticize Israel's actions politically,
And it just it's all racist. You can't
even use a, what they say, a double
standard against Israel, whatever that even means. It
is completely a anything against Israel will be
called antisemitism, which is the entire point.
And we'll go over it.
Now I I will I'm gonna go into
this more about the many different people who
are being taken right now,
deported.
Almost every single one of them has some
high level education. People that are, you know
and or already doctors who are just being
accused of being terrorists because they call out
something everybody knows is happening.
To make sure that one's something I wanna
include on the way out here.
In The UK, it's happening as well. Don't
forget,
Trump floating the idea of reporting deporting Americans
is very important.
And this one says, it took many conservatives
about eight weeks to go from no more
Middle East wars. F the military industrial
complex, keep that money here at home, to
hell yeah, Trump restarted Biden's bombing of Yemen,
and we're collapsing residential buildings throughout The Middle
East. Hooray.
He's right. It's embarrassing. Now Donald Trump, you
might have seen on the twenty seventh, has
started bombing Somalia again even though nothing really
stopped. I said the peace president. And if
you think it's about the 100% defeated ISIS
as they claim, you're not paying attention.
But don't worry. Tulsi Gabbard comes out and
says, president Trump is the president of peace.
He's ending bloodshed across the world.
She I mean, did we if you ever
wondered where she really was in all this,
I think you know by now. And I
just simply gave him that. Yeah. Face it
or publicly doing the exact opposite, you know,
interesting times.
And then Kevorka Mason says, if The US
can detect somebody on a hit list in
Yemen, like they claim they did, and then
follow him going into his girlfriend's home,
which is what they claim,
why doesn't the US army bomb him on
his way
to that residential building pack of people?
Do they drop a, do they drop a
bomb on the entire residential building? Am I
asking the wrong question?
You know what he's saying, guys. There's There's
more to the whole Yemen signal debacle. At
the end of the day, it shows you
just what Israel is doing in Gaza. K?
They are if they're claiming what they claim
they can do and have proven they can,
can pin like, track somebody to the person,
then explain why they keep bombing entire buildings
to whole people.
It's obvious because they want to.
And so, dad, I'm gonna go into this
more as well, but Sal says, is literally
anybody buying the whole we need to conquer
Greenland for our own safety shtick? They're literally
doing that now. You know, the whole the
whole you're being trolled about Greenland that's now
literally becoming real. They are actually discussing this
as if they are going to take Greenland
by force. And there's a Guardian article claiming
that Putin endorses it. At part I can
tell, it's completely not even true.
We'll go over this more. You have Vance
trying to convince Greenland that they're somehow not
doing their duty for The United States. It's
it's just insane what's going on.
And here there's a video. Actually, let me
do this.
Yeah. I don't wanna end with that. Trump
put out a video
promoting taking Greenland. It's it's better to go
into this tomorrow or than whatever. If if
most likely tomorrow, another show.
But think about how wild this is.
As mentioned since this propaganda video made to
prepare minds for the takeover of Greenland mentions
the threat of China expansion. The US has
nearly a thousand bases abroad. China may have
one or two. In the past two months,
the US has spoken about invading Canada, Greenland,
Mexico, Panama, and even Gaza.
My god. And let's not forget USAID
to build with Gaza. We'll see how that
works out. This may be the most insane
error of United States yet, says Daniel McAdams.
And this is CNN has learned exclusively that
Ecuador isn't just calling for US help. It's
preparing to host American
troops.
You hear that? Ryan Grim says Trump is
literally considering stationing troops in Ecuador.
Why?
Because a center left party is competing in
an oncoming election.
South America First. Well, Israel First. South America
Second. Then then America.
That's insane.
So the idea being, essentially, that we need
to control the outcome of elections. Now let's
not forget Ecuador.
Right? We're talking about, like, there is an
ongoing effort to overtake a lot of this
location. It's not Honduras. Let's not forget. That's
Prospera.
Freedom City's popping off. We will get to
that soon. I am still continue to build
that in the background. There's gonna come a
time when that's gonna be needed to talk
about.
The point is clear, guys.
This cannot be anything other than I mean,
look. If you wanna pretend this is America
First,
then at least make sure you make sure
you're being clear that it's American government first
at the expense of Americans because this is
not what people wanted. This could not want
the right one at the very least, not
what anybody wants.
Stand up.
Now is the time. Stay the course. I
mean, I've I've been doing this for a
long time, and I've never seen a more
important time to actually start, you know, mobilizing
effort against this direction. Whatever that means to
you, and I'm never calling for violence. But
I think the more people we can get
to be aware that we're all seeing this,
the better the the more effective this will
be in stopping it. I mean, we can't
just stand here and do nothing, guys. The
more you stand up, the more you call
this out, the more people see what's happening,
the more they recognize that it's okay to
say something. Corbett's talked about the Milgram experiment,
the TSA overlap. Right? If you just simply
show people like we're trying to do here,
that you don't have to sit by and
let it happen, I mean, some people haven't
even registered that they could do that.
That's not that's not a joke. People see
you resisting,
like the example being at the TSA, for
example, and they go, oh, I don't have
to just stand in this line and do
what you say. I didn't even know that
was an option.
Show people that there's another option. It's push
back. Stand up. Say something. Call this out
because, guys, we cannot let this just dwindle
into the background.
Whatever you thought this country ever was, if
it ever really was, we thought it was.
We cannot lose what we are slowly losing
right now. Because, I mean, it seems to
be this last dying grasp, even the illusion
of it, stopping whatever's coming.
Stand up and fight. Thank you for being
here. Thank you for supporting TLav. I love
you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.