Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last twenty four hours.
Wednesday, March twenty six twenty twenty five. Thank
you for joining me today. Definitely some important
things that I wanted to cover around the
spending aspect that I want I don't think
people are giving enough attention to. Definitely, the
the
hypocrisy that I think is very important and
not for, like, a a a team sport
politic kind of dynamic, but just understanding how
often our government uses, like we always talk
about, things that we wanna go after to
drive us somewhere new. And so what I
think is really interesting is we're so a
lot of people are so hyper focused on
the
back and forth and and and really highlighting
things that should be removed, but not paying
attention to the fact that in a lot
of cases, they're still doing this, essentially, the
same things.
I went after yesterday, day before yesterday, the
really interesting,
circumcision point they keep discussing for Mozambique.
And to my surprise, in fact, I I
I really didn't think I was gonna find
as specifically.
I went first for that exact point and
found exactly the same thing in the context
of HIV. Found many of them. I'll show
you that brief briefly today. But I wanted
to go over some more that I found
coming off of a new video where they're
referencing something about transgender
funding of agriculture,
whatever. Stuff that's outrageously stupid that we should
be in the context of especially with where
the country is, that any funding should be
going anywhere else, especially for things like that.
But to show you that there's still funding
coming through in the same way,
I almost don't even know how to place
that in my mind.
And and one and secondarily, how it's not
that becoming such a it should be a
gigantic story, especially because of how
just hypocritical it is. Like, we all like
to see the contradictions of what, especially, people
in power are claiming. And yet we keep
finding these very, very clear contradictions, and it
just doesn't seem to go anywhere.
So I wanted to reiterate some of those
spending right out of the gate again. I
wanna make sure I point out one positive
thing that I saw around the NIH that
I that I but overlapping that with the
concerning direction that I really do think the
I mean, the the whole of the US
government is driving in. But in particular,
through the health vein,
the artificial intelligence.
I mean, it's the great reset direction. It's
the same dynamic. And and concerning with seeing
it coming through,
RFK Junior, health and human services, you know,
however you
place all of that, it is still happening.
And, of course, with the new CDC edition,
right, what was her name again?
Susan
Manares.
And the interesting pushback around that, it just
it's, you know, when this the conversation started,
it wasn't that we were gonna get a
little bit less bad. Right? It wasn't the
entire administration was gonna be lesser of evils.
It was get past this election dynamic, and
then this is gonna change everything. And it's
gonna be all the better. But that has
that's not it's been the lesser of evils
in entirety.
It's not the no mRNA shots. It's the
better direction for the mRNA shots or anything
like that. And it's
I again, I tend to think most people
see it. I don't know how they couldn't
see it
unless more people are dishonest than not, and
I just can't believe that. That's not how
I don't can be I can't do this
if that's what I believe the world is
like. But we're gonna talk about the overlap
of that with the digital ID point and
how as we were concerned about and as
now seems to beginning to be coming to
pass, I'm gonna hold off on it and
really diving into it until we see more
continue, but Donald Trump has reiterated the point
of the voter ID aspect,
which I'll say again like I did the
last time. I agree with the vast majority
of what he's laying out around this. I
don't think that's really what it's about. I
think this is a problem that's been created
to justify the step that's gonna be made.
But the point I'm gonna highlight again is
what Catherine Austin fits on it as well,
the Real ID overlap, which is the digital
ID direction. It's just a it's a step
in that direction using something that I don't
even know why anybody would disagree with.
The idea that we should make sure that
people are are US citizens who are voting.
It seems like a wildly benign thing, and
yet it gets this this amazing conversation, like,
in the sense that it's just, like, it's
absurd.
And I think there's a reason for that.
To hide something like this. That's my personal
opinion, but we'll go through that again and
show you the developments in that direction and
how that then overlaps with the
artificial intelligence government direction. Now I didn't need
to include this today because we've basically covered
this already, but I wanted to show you
a couple additional points.
But to show you how
I mean, it's just right on the surface.
They're not even hiding this. And it's something
that in some circles that people don't even
admit is happening, which is artificial intelligence in
the function of government. And, I mean, I'm
worried about the overarching idea that maybe they're
testing some actual just, like, artificial
government government in the sense of, like, top
down in control.
That's for you to decide. They are rolling
out artificial intelligence programs that are,
automating
things that should be done through humans and
things that overlap with wild privacy concerns, and
that's just the surface level. When you get
into the concerns about, I don't know, foreign
countries' involvement or using your privacy data to
train AI models for other things, including foreign
policy and
murder overseas.
It becomes a little bit more chilling. But
I wanna go show you some points of
you know, obviously, that develops with, connects with
the points we were just highlighting, and you'll
see how all that comes together. I also
wanna get into a conversation about,
it's kind of the overlap of the two,
but,
rather Israel,
The United States foreign policy, how that overlaps
with that conversation. But, the the interesting signal
chat thing that I'm not really gonna get
into too much because I quite frankly think
it's mostly manipulation, but I will point some
things out about how that relates to Yemen
and from there, the overlap of what is
going on in Israel. But we're gonna end
today with the point about the the it's
it's more alarming than
I mean, I I I almost have to
say quite frankly that the it's the specific
part about the Venezuelan gang overlap into
Trump openly saying that Americans might be sent
there as well. It has to be one
of the most alarming things in the context
of the rapid as I framed the title
today, the rapid decline of American liberty that
I've ever seen. Not to say that I
haven't seen more act
more extreme action, let's say. But the the
way that this is going from the Oval
Office openly discussing Americans being sent overseas
for things that we have laws for. Charge
them with a crime. Why would they be
sent to an El Salvadorian concentration camp, which
is quite literally what it is? It meets
the exact definition.
It's insane. And I don't know why it's
not getting more pushback.
But there has been a surge
in what I think are I mean, textbook,
unconstitutional
deportations.
And we'll go over that again today. And
it's it's rapidly increasing. But I wanna start
with a couple of points for you guys
to see,
some censorship stuff that I thought was interesting.
More more kind of, confirming for some that
may not have seen that this this goes
all the way back to, like, the Gibson
Go discussion, which I mean, there's still people
that occasionally donate there.
But let's not forget, we did that program,
and I've never gotten a straight answer from
them or any it appears to be well,
put it this way. I've never been able
to confirm that it was them that that
had, like,
not been allowing recurring donations.
They were very kind. They went back and
forth with me. They said that's what they
sent to banks. So this the one I'm
about to show you here does seem to
suggest that it's all banks, which is wild
to me. But my point is we did
a give send go, and I'll I'll I'll
I'll include it for you in case you
wanted to donate there. I I do still
get one time donations.
If you or if you wanna try to
do a recurring donation, just see if it
works. But we we set this up in
regard to right as with all the lawsuits
were kind of fun funneling down. And and
what we did get through this at the
time, it was about
over the process of couple of months, about
$10,000
was a huge help in the $50,000
plus amount we've had to spend on lawsuits.
So thank you for all of your support
and ongoing support.
The point was we set this up for
one main reason as you guys remember. It
was not just the single donations, but let's
get some recurring people who wanna donate $1
a month on a recurring donation. Let's get
that building. That's what we all need in
this field.
And then everybody
not a single recurring donation ever succeeded through
this platform. In this donate, none of them
were able to. I got many different things
sent to me showing that they were declined,
wouldn't go through, just didn't happen. So here's
the thing to think about. And this is
how the kind of suppression financially works in
the field that it's not left to right.
It's anybody challenging the power structure.
If we would have gotten $10,000 in recurring
donations, I wouldn't be I we don't need
to worry about any I mean, that that
could have sustained what we're doing for an
incredibly long time.
And then, of course, we would try to
build from there. The point is we didn't
get that. We got the lump of amount,
and then it fell off. You know? And
so this is how this stuff happens in
my opinion. So I wanna show you this
is this is what we're still dealing with.
This is what most people this this is
somebody who just reached out again saying from
that and all the way to this point
forward has still been trying to donate.
And it says simply your debit card is
it says that it's been declined for the
last American vagabond. And he has gone through
this over and over more than once and
has shown me personally that it's not an
issue with anything other than just not letting
it happen for this one thing. Try it
again on the twenty seventh, been declined.
And it's simply because it's the last American
Vagabond.
Or at the very least, it's just not
letting it in this one transaction and everything
else is happening. So just for you guys
to know that it is happening, and this
is kind of now we wanna get into
the idea of, like, debanking, for example.
I mean, isn't that I mean, it's not
like we're being put yet anyway kicked out
of banks, but is this not the same
thing in reverse? Our people are literally trying
to send money to people that they wanna
support with their funds and the banks are
saying, not that one.
I mean, that's it's obviously it's not new.
We all know this is happening. But as
we step into this digital infrastructure, the technocratic
control structure, the, I guess, anybody anti Israel
or any anti genocide in eco ecosphere where
that just does it's doesn't allow it's not
allowed or it doesn't apply.
We know where this goes. And, again, be
clear about this, guys. If you think for
one second, this is only one side of
the paradigm, then you have been paying attention.
It's obvious that the main problems are endorsed
by all the sides
or the one the government.
But I wanted to point that out to
start so you guys can see that that
is still going on, and I'll include
some different things for you guys if you
wanna help a lot support this platform as
I tend to do at the end, not
even all the time. I will show you
now if you could support us here on
the website. Just the general donate page is
right there, which is how you can do
that through any a few different options
through Stripe, through direct donation. The mailing address
is right there. If you wanna click that,
it's at the bottom. I'll include that.
I didn't mean to click it. Now it's
going well, it's right here.
Or actually, oh, I'm sorry. If you go
through the process in this, it gives you
an option of,
mailing it, and then it provides the email.
I should just place that somewhere around the
home page, quite frankly. But on top of
that, if you guys would like to support
us otherwise, we have a lot of different
ways to do so here, like Bitcoin donation,
Litecoin, or really anything. Reach out to me.
We can take address for anything, Cash App,
SubscribeStar,
all sorts of stuff, guys. But as always,
we need your support. Or you could go
to things like Bitchute, for example, where they
have donation models on there, but I would
argue you go to platforms like this to
do so other than pretty much everything else.
Now starting with the hypocrisy spending, I really
find this so fast. This the last show.
I I get buried. I I take I
spend way too much time doing this because
it's it is really interesting. I recommend you
try it. Take the time. Take USACE. Take
any one of these links and hit this
little flag at the top left, USA spending,
and it brings you to the home page.
Hit start searching awards.
K? And then just mess around with it.
There's a whole bunch of metrics. To to
just you know, what I tend to do
very specifically
is I go into the time here, and
I enter in the date that that the
administration took over, which is 01/20/2025,
and then I put the date of today,
whatever date that is.
You know? And then, just do for sake
of conversation,
which I know that's not the date, put
that in there. Boom. There's the date. Okay.
And then go to keyword,
and type in whatever keyword you're looking for.
Now it's not completely at always, you know,
it's sometimes it's there's a little bit of
deviations, nuance, but generally speaking, it's pretty specific.
So you you know, type in USAID, for
example, and and just hit search, and it
will give
you multiple categories of contracts, grants, different things.
Grants tend to be more of the what
I see as most of the
way that we've seen this play out. But,
you know, there's a whole bunch, guys. So
take the time for yourself. Now I went
through it like I tend to do and
just looked for a lot of things, but
specifically based on what I think are the
contradictions.
Not because and really because it's not about
left and right. Trying to show you that
this is not about one side or the
other, but rather it's about narrative control. It's
about keeping you thinking that you're only fighting
one side so then you blindly trust the
other or, you know, whatever the current thing
is.
So here's the show we recently did this
on. The one point we're touching on now
is the Trump admin spending reveals hypocrisy.
Here is a clip that Insurrection Barbie, of
course, put out today or rather on the
twenty fourth, and it says, I need people
to listen to this and realize, of course,
Democrats
are never allowed to have power again.
It's just so funny that you can people
can act like it's an intelligent take to
box out half the country. You know what
I mean? Or rather, specifically, half of the
illusion of the country because most people most
people don't partake in either side. Now that's
why I'm always trying to highlight for people
out there that this is not a an
opinion, that most people see these things. Guys,
if you recognize, like Steve and I point
out all the time, that in every single
election even the midterms, what you end up
getting, the majority of people don't partake.
So right there, you recognize. No. Yeah. Some
of that is people that are lazy, don't
care, you know, and whatever. Most of what
I argue based on my research is people
that are just tired and recognize this is
nonsense.
Not that it always is or has to
be, shouldn't be. It should be I I
I find, especially if you have to live
in a state of society, that the representative
government or your involvement in that is important.
But when we see that half of them,
more than half aren't even involved, and then
of the grouping that do partake, the I
mean, it's always about 40 something percent are
registered as independent.
Right? So for for them to come out
and act like Democrats, it's just it's one
that either they're falling for the trap or
they're promoting the trap. But on top of
that, that they're just acting like this is
just not people's opinion on that side just
doesn't matter.
It's literally
ignorance, guys. It's ignorance masquerading as logic.
So the point is that this clip is
about her rattling off things that I agree
are absolutely insane.
Ridiculous stuff that we should never be funding
whether or not you agree with transgender x,
y, and z.
So here's the clip first. Now just I'll
play just the beginning so you can hear
what the she's getting at. Just add to
that, and thank you. We just had a
wonderful cabinet meeting, all aligned on on certainly
the the effort to realign the government. But
even at the US Department of Agriculture, we've
canceled,
$300,000
contract educating on food justice, for queer and
transgender farmers in San Francisco.
A similar contract we canceled in New York.
Now in in its own right, like, I
get it. There are people that really do
buy into this stuff. Just like, by the
way, you could argue or you could point
out that on the extreme right of the
side of conversation,
which I think most people, including a lot
of conservatives, look at and go, jeez. People
are ridiculous. You know? But that's the point.
There are people on the extreme sides of
this that buy into the most radically cartoon
ass aspects of both sides of the paradigm.
So just to be clear, there are people
who think that makes sense. But I think
most people go, what?
Food? Equality?
Food? Transgender? Like, it it it's it is
actually logical. What does that even mean? It's
almost as if you're trying to create some
cartoonish thing that is meant to be called
out. That's you can decide what you think
about it. That's just my take on the
surface, though. The point is that that is
crazy in my opinion, shouldn't be funded. But
what I'm about to show you is that
some of that stuff is already still happening
in the new administration.
Sorry about that. I bumped that on accident.
Again, educating transgender
and queer farmers on food justice and food
equality. I mean, what does that miss, I
was gonna say food justice equality. What does
that even mean? It's almost like that's meant
to be ridiculous.
I'm not even sure what that means, but,
but, apparently, the last administration want to put
our taxpayer dollars towards that. We canceled a
$600,000
contract in Louis out of Louisiana
that was studying the menstrual cycles of transgender
men, a $600,000
contract.
Just wait. Keep all this in mind. You
might be like, if you're going, yeah. It's
so great. Just wait. You're gonna find the
exact same things that are currently being funded.
Well, I shouldn't say exact same, but that's
the way this goes. It's gonna be similar
dynamics
about transgender.
Well well well, but you'll see what's coming
up next. We canceled another contract out of,
a university in the middle of the country
that focused on getting more diversity, equity, and
inclusion
Those two. Into our pest management
industry.
Again, they I mean, see what I mean,
what you could argue that means is what,
you know, hiring
what men and women and trans and whatever
all in the pest field. Like, what does
hell does that matter? Like, the idea that
we ever tried to I mean, the the
larger point, guys, is you take the different
sides of this,
and it's not, you know, what the woke
side over here, but, like, we can discuss
even right where we're gonna get to, the
the the immigration aspect and and and the
a violation of constitute. All it really comes
down to is a violation of your rights
on every angle. Right? So on the woke
side of it, what we're talking about? Like,
forcing things on people that are hiring or,
you know, at the end of the day,
things that should not be the government's decision.
I should be able to hire whoever I
want based on who I want for my
business, and people can choose to use that
business if they want to. And if you
wanna go if you go there and think
that I'm being discriminatory or whatever else, then
you could choose to go somewhere else. Maybe
that's what you want. The point is about
liberty, actual liberty. And, yes, within that, there
are times when people can be offended. Oh
my gosh. But see, the thing is, right
now, you can see the right.
Outraged and offended or, you know, how would
they wanna frame it about certain things that
are happening today or getting people fired from
their jobs for bad jokes or going after
people. You know, it's the same things, guys.
At the end of the day, it comes
down to removal of your rights because narrative,
because of justification.
Well, when we all at some point around
the conversation stand up and say, shall not
be infringed except, you know, except for when
they do that or when they do this.
Well, no. That's not how that works.
So just keep that in mind.
So here,
I'd click this out from the other show.
Now I'm not gonna play it. It's about
twenty minutes, but I'll skim through and show
you some things. I said, what about Trump's
admin still funding outrageous items just like this,
including male circumcision in Africa for HIV prevention
or climate change related funding, all of which
is happening. Or would you or will you
choose to ignore it like any anything else
that exposes the two party grift? Now what
I think is really crazy about this,
I posted these I posted that underneath as
a comment,
and I posted this over here.
Even had it pinned for a while on
my platform.
K. This this simply said, everyone rightly calling
out the absurd USAID spending by Biden should
also be calling out the Trump admin currently
funding male circumcision in Africa for HIV. Same
stuff. But But think about this, guys. We
I've I've what is it now?
See, my my follower count has gone down
too now since it drops all the time.
Lose a few thousand here and there. 74,000
followers.
K.
So just argue that I can post this,
you know I mean, sometimes I'll post things
that'll say you know, let's just say earlier
today. Hours have gone by, and it's got
up 1,200
views.
I mean, guys, that just doesn't make any
sense. Like, you can go back to it
the next day. You'll see. Look at the
view count. Look at the engagement. So that's
that's the point. It's not about the shares,
likes. It's about the engagement.
So based on the way this is supposed
to work, people who choose to look for
you they I follow, which means I want
to see his work in my feed, which
let's remember that people follow lots of people.
Right? But see, logically,
this is always where I point out metric
when you look at the metrics, if you
have so many followers, you should get, generally
speaking, a certain percentage of that on average
if this was an accurate, not centering platform.
Right? Because those people want to see your
content, so it will show up in their
feed if they scroll or they sit there.
Right? Especially if they have the bell clicked,
which a lot of people do. The problem
is that if I have 74,000
followers and these things get a thousand views,
then it's proving to you that that's not
even the case. And I mean views, like
engagement, meaning it's just they if they scroll
by, that counts.
So and you can compare that to people
like on this side of it where she
post a random video with really I mean,
it's the same thing in reverse.
She has less than a million followers.
The engagement gets 1,100,000
views.
Right? I mean, it should show that's I
mean, realistically, that wouldn't surprise me if that's
accurate. Because you have a million followers, you're
probably gonna get people that look at it.
Right? That's just a side point, just recognizing
that stuff like this should be getting more
attention, not whether I share it or not,
but because it is a huge, huge
political partisan contradiction. I mean, if that is
that not like the bread and butter of
what gets viral on this platform? It's incredible.
But so here, before we get into the
next part of it, is what we just
showed you before.
Some spending points. I just wanna make this
very clear. And I wanna do this early
in the show because this is just a
really quick rapid succession of just straight up
blatant hypocrisy. Now really quickly, that that's me
talking from the day before yesterday, just so
that's clear. So just in case there's any
overlap, I wanna make it clear in case
it sounds like I'm saying something that happened
today, and it was two days ago. Just
so you know that. So I'm not gonna
play the whole thing. Just the opening.
I've there's always some narrative about how some
secret holdover and you know, if you're gonna
if you're gonna, certainly possible, right, that there's
a holdover from the Democrats or Jump in
a little bit. This one I could go
through each one of these. There's, like, four
that they just kinda keep saying over and
over. One of which is circumcision in Mozambique,
and we keep hearing it because it sounds
crazy, because it is crazy.
Now when you understand, and this is not
in any way well, I should say first
of all that all of these categories,
I'm not highlighting this as good or bad.
Even though I definite at some points, I
will jump in and tell you my opinion.
But overall, it's not about whether these are
good or bad for this point today. It's
about the fact that we have been told
these things have been stopped, that this is
this is why we have to fight the
USAID plan, which I agree USAID is a
problem even though they're not doing that. They're
continuing it on the state department.
They're saying this is why. Look at all
the dumb things they were spending. Okay. Then
if you think that, then ask then stand
back and explain to me why they're continuing
to fund those things and why that makes
sense. I just wanna trigger this critical thought
for people.
So one of the main things you hear
are things like that.
Mozambique, Circumcision. Now what's interesting before we go
over just this one category, and don't take
this as me saying this should be done,
I wanna make a very clear line here
that I think, like a lot of people
in this country right now think, even some
that want foreign spending for help for whatever
they believe whatever they believe they're gonna help
people around the world, that right now, most
people in this country are saying, how about
we just stop all of it until we
figure out what's going on? Agree. That's what
a lot of people feel. Mozambique Circumcision is
interesting because the main point, you can just
look at one of these many different PolitiFact
checks or whatever. This is not to say
what this is basically showing you is that
the the our the argument is so you
don't just think it's some random thing. I
mean, it still is, by the way, for
I don't think that's what they're really doing
it for. This is me speaking today, by
the way, which is ultimately that it's the
argument is the circumcision is one of the
best ways to prevent the spread of HIV
or whatever they're dealing with. Whatever you think
about that, just that's what the argument is.
So you can understand why some people might
go, no. That's necessary. Whatever. So and my
point would be that at some level, people
that are doing this, like the people on
the ground with the USAID bill not realizing
they're part of some regime change engine who
might think they're helping people, and maybe in
some cases they are. That's not the point.
The point is that that is still happening
right now under HIV predominantly, which I wanna
point out later
after a couple videos.
I think there's more to that about why
there's this weird overarching focus on HIV more
than anything. I'll come back to that. K.
That I agree this should be done, but
the point they make in this, just the
one I want to highlight, first of it
could be taken to prevent the spread. Again,
none of us should be okay with that
being four. Two of which is 11 different
things are funding something that mentions circumcision. I'm
only gonna show you four, two of which
specifically
relate to Mozambique.
So here
is one that says the Department of Health
and Human Services. This is most of them.
The trustees of Columbia and University in the
city of New York. The simple point.
There's a there's a long thing you can
read here. It goes over a lot of
health stuff. The main point, increased coverage of
HIV prevention, a services, including voluntary medical male
circumcision.
Okay.
So is that not what we're talking about?
Right? I mean, look, guys. This is it's
it's wild to me. Just scrolling back, it's
a male
circumcision program in Mozambique.
Okay.
So here we are literally talking about the
exact same thing.
HIV prevention,
voluntary male circumcision.
And some and two and two of these
are literally with Mozambique.
So it's actually crazy to me. So here,
there's two points to make.
That one, that it's just we live in
an illusion that every would lie about everything,
and we're debating about false divisions, but that
there's a corporate media structure that we're told
is desperate
rid of Trump and go after Elon, and
yet these things are just laying out there
for them. People like us point them out.
And there's can you imagine
if we're to believe they're going after them,
if they could stand up and go, you
just claimed like, the argument being that they're
all supportive of the USAID and that it's
like they they're all the democrats who want
the woke stuff, and they're trying to fight
against the democrats who want the woke stuff.
Right? So then wouldn't they stand up and
go, well, then why are you funding the
same thing? Bombshell.
Mic drop. Why doesn't that happen?
I mean, guys, you have to recognize at
some level, there's a there's an interest in
maintaining this this puppet show.
I mean, that's how I see it. Either
way, tell me why that's not a big
deal. And I don't mean because in the
sense of, like, that's more important than genocide
or major things in deportation or whatever you
think is important in this country. It's a
big deal because it shows you the illusion.
This it's a big deal for breaking down
people who are lost in the two party
illusion that keeps you from actually changing this
country.
Here, it goes over a lot of health
stuff. The main point, increased coverage of HIV
prevention, a services, including voluntary medical male circumcision.
Okay. So if we're gonna be logically consistent
here, we might wanna ask why Donald Trump's
administration, specifically,
this month, has spent $14,000,000
to fund, in in part,
circumcision in in in this is specifically in
where was this, the location? I mean, honestly,
location should be irrelevant, but I believe it
was somewhere,
yeah, in Tanzania. Yeah. That one's Tanzania. So
it's kind of a all this
thing, one kind of Republic Of Tanzania.
This alone Oh, and that by the way,
that was $14,000,000,
so that's obviously relevant.
$14,000,000
Donald Trump's administration
has dumped in in March
sixth of this year, March sixth '20 '20
'5, put $14,000,000
in the hands of Tanzania's government, apparently, allegedly,
for male circum well, is one part of
a larger HIV program of which included male
circumcision.
Should be that's that's the exact same story
with a little bit different flavor. Right? A
little bit different propaganda, but the same damn
thing. It's just not in the interest of
the partisan control structure to make that contradiction
because they, I think, need you outraged about
the woke direction to get you blinded to
the new coming direction.
This. $14,000,000
sustained should cause outrage.
That seems wild to me. In The Republic
Of South Africa. K. That one's $1,515,000,000
dollars.
Same thing. Provision of voluntary medical mayor male
circumcision for HIV prevention in South Africa.
So maybe not Mozambique. Is it is it
Mozambique that you're outraged about, or is it
the fact that they're funding right now
in multiple ways? These are just four contracts
and already over $30,000,000.
Can you imagine what that would do for
Americans right now?
How about the ones that are suffering in
North Carolina? I guess we just went past
that already. Yeah. So is it only Mozambique
that we're upset with, or yet again that
there's a whole bunch of and if you
if you actually go through these guys, many
of these have, like, multiple fundings, like, you
know,
in in just since March. This one's only
one.
Here's another one.
This one is $7,100,000.
7 point 1.
This was on March 17. I should just
mute it and scroll. There is HIV prevention,
voluntary mail, you know, male circumcision. Like, okay.
So here's what's crazy. If we're gonna pretend
that they had to cancel one program,
right, for male circumcision,
but yet they've currently got multiple programs going
on for male circumcision when they're still funding
to this very moment? Shouldn't that be a
bigger deal?
Shouldn't we go outraged, woke, right, funding male
circumcision? Yeah. We really should.
Now this goes on, and I go into
a few different things. K? I go into
try to scroll and see
without going too far. Okay. Here's one.
This was oh, so I go I go
into basically COVID nineteen, mRNA,
and climate change.
And you you probably won't be surprised if
you're watching this show to recognize that Donald
Trump's administration is quite literally funding things around
climate change.
Access to community this one is just community
HIV testing. I mean, they're spending millions upon
millions upon millions of dollars to
most of this, especially today, again, seems to
be centered around HIV.
Now you as well as I, especially Republicans
probably who were paying attention more during COVID
nineteen, who recognized that there's a wildly clear
overlap to the whole AIDS, HIV ploy illusion
to the
overlap to the whole AIDS HIV ploy
illusion to the reality of the COVID nineteen
SARS CoV two game. It's the same thing.
They that we have to recognize that what
they literally did with these injections was create
an autoimmune disorder that's basically like, this is
what people argue is that ultimately that what
they called AIDS was really just a it
was a problem that was created by the
same response. Now that's for you to decide.
The reality is what we know and, again,
I've gone over all of this. I just
don't wanna dive into it now. We went
over this during COVID nineteen that you can
prove. Whether you think some of it is
what they claim, that what they gave people
in those shots literally caused
you could call it HIV.
You call it what you call it, an
immune suppressive kind of dynamic that's caused the
same kind of outcome that they then claim
is another issue.
But the problem here, guys, is that that's
just the reason I'm trying to show that
is because it's weird that there's all this
background funding specifically around some HIV kind of
infrastructure
when that seems to be the easiest way
to categorize, like, a whole lot of what
these COVID well, just mRNA shots have caused.
And as they're rolling out a massive platform,
they claim for cancer, but it'll be more,
you wonder if they're just getting ahead of
it.
And what's funny about it, guys, is a
lot of a lot of probably most conservatives
would have gone absolutely if I was talking
about the Biden administration, and far too many
of them would ignore it if I was
talking about the Trump. But I don't believe
all of them.
I just wanna show you at least one
of these before I go forward. This was
COVID nineteen. And that same thing, there's funding
COVID nineteen data tracking, COVID nineteen investigating, all
sorts of things that shouldn't make sense right
now seeing as how we're past that, at
least as they tell us.
More funding for mRNA, like genetic splat the
what was the one was about,
killer cells and different aspects. All again, around
HIV,
but all mRNA research that we I mean,
gain of function. It's what we're talking about.
Here. This one is just you could see,
and there's plenty of these. Environmental indicators and
population modeling to support climate change impact assessment.
Does that sound like something Trump's administration will
be funding?
They are.
Now again, I'm not trying to say good
or bad. I mean, I I would even
argue in some let me just get it
right down to the money here. There you
go.
So
that's almost $400,000.
Now there's aspects of that. There's aspect of
climate I mean, many different climate change things.
I'll leave it there since I'm you know,
there's a lot. Watch the whole thing. So
back to the reality.
The same point. You know, that they're sitting
here calling out these things, and I simply
point out, well, here's examples of them doing
that now.
An honest reporter would care about that. Because
if if if it's about the idea about
the person, the cult of personality, well, then
you're not really a journalist. If it's about
the outcome, the the content, the not allowing
this because bad for America, well, then this
should be the same story. But we know
it's not. We know why. Now here, I'm
gonna show you some things about what she
was pointing out in that video. Okay? Talking
about transgender,
agriculture,
whatever.
Now this is just a what is it?
Looks like eight of them. And you and
you I think I've included oh, no. I
I think I closed it. I I usually,
I I keep open the actual search so
you can look at the other contracts, but
simple like I showed you. Put the date
in, search for the word transgender, and it
will pop up. So this is also USAID,
by the way. Funny how USAID has been
shuttered, except they're still funding the transgender research
or transgender you know, but and, by the
way, through Rubio, through the state department, through
Trump's administration.
Now this says and, again, you can read
all there's there's always there's you get the
full paragraph. It goes in and saying, USAID
is phased in three year there's just a
lot of stuff they write. Delivery to support
existing implementer
what does it say?
Far supported provinces with progressive okay. The point
is I'm trying to encapsulate the part that's
relevant, but also what this means in general.
And so it says, this service delivery activity
will include all aspects of the HIV epidemic
control of key and and vulnerable populations,
transgender people who inject drugs, and people in
prison. So this is just simply an overlap,
but this program focuses specifically or one part
of which is transgender people and prevention of
HIV. That's what a lot of these seem
to be related to. Now even if you
the the aspect aspect of the HIV doesn't
or rather the transgender part doesn't interest you,
why are we funding HIV prevention in other
countries, which is this is The Congo. It's
the same point.
And this one
is for almost a million dollars. That was
in February after Trump's administration took took,
took power.
HHS. So that's Rob,
RK junior. Advancing sustainable implementation
of comprehensive HIV prevention and treatment programs in
faith based
and private sites in Nairobi,
coast, and Western regions in The Republic Of
Kenya. And down here, it specifically mentions transgender
people. The proposed project will implement the voluntary
male medical circumcision program. Well, now we've got
a whole overlap. We've got transgender focus, we've
got male circumcision, and we've got HIV prevention
in and and make sure that it is
sustainable and that they are faith based programs
in Nairobi and and Africa and Kenya.
And that is for
$2,000,000.
That's happened March third of this year.
That's health and human services.
This one is for $600,000.
That was about a week after they took
power.
And this one, this is it says effectiveness
and implementation of text messaging to improve HIV
testing in sexual and gender minority adolescents, transgender
girls, and diverse
gender diverse teens.
Okay.
Important to not just focus on the HIV
testing, but make sure we're studying the text
messaging and how that can improve
the chan the transgender
HIV and gay you know, it's just it's,
I mean, to
me, it may not sound as ridiculously
cartoonish
as transgender
diversity for agriculture, whatever she was saying, but
you have to realize this is it's like
I always talk about. It is the same
point. Now, really, just objectively, this should be
just as crazy for anybody who actually cares
about what the spending was going to, especially
since it's the same category. My point is,
though, as I said before with USAID and
others, it's a means to an end. Yes.
There is some movement through this, but if
you understand historically or just the broader picture
of what these are, they're not trying to
influence you to make
to use proper pronouns or d e I.
This is about a means to an end
for what they militarily
or or, you know, geopolitically wanna accomplish in
foreign countries.
It's very simple.
Books been written about this forever. Today, we're
just overtaken by a bunch of people who
woke up in 2020 and think they know
everything about everything because they start listening to
people in the mainstream alternative media. The problem
is that this is just the new direction.
And I think what we're seeing here and
not this in particular, but we're seeing them
develop that. What I think this is is
sort of holdovers from that. This is whatever
this is aimed at, this is that excuse
is still working on the ground in this
location. That's what I think it is. But
that's completely my opinion. The only point that
I'm making based on the facts is this
is still happening.
And that should matter.
Obviously.
$600,000.
This one, also USAID,
weirdly after it's been shuttered, new LGBTQI
USPSC
program advisor supporting the Bureau for Development, Democracy,
and Innovation,
inclusive development hub programs protecting the human rights
of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex
individuals. See, I saved the good ones for
the latter part. In case you thought it
wasn't gonna be something more you know, even
those before were obviously the same thing. But
you could try to make an argument for
why it's just including them in the category.
No. No. This is explicitly clear. This is
for oh, this one's important, by the way,
because I want this is what I wanna
point out.
As we showed
before, not only did they fund this in
2025, the point though is that they continued
the direction. And I thought this one was
the most standing out because we're talking about
LGBTQ
programs
for inclusive development of of lesbian, gay, bisexual,
trans I mean, it sounds like the if
you walk up to the street and said
Trump funded this, nobody would believe you or
his administration
or some holdover democrat, which is always the
excuse. But what I want you to see
is not only did they continue the program,
I'd rather just they they took action. They
could've ignored this entirely, and that still would've
continued it. The point is they on,
the
three days after they took power, they touched
base with this, and they took other administrative
action and continued the program. That's what that
shows you. And that's what's under disclosed awardees,
undisclosed, or other domestic, which I find interesting.
So just recognize that this stuff is not
stopping. Now the point right now, there's no
more funding, but they've continued the program. It
didn't go away. It's not zeroed out, and
there's more that's likely gonna come when nobody's
paying attention.
This one
is also HHS.
Strategies to prevent HIV acquisition among transgender
transgender men who have sex with men, for
French, she just said the same thing, are
at risk of HIV acquisition in The US
and require gender affirming, culturally responsive,
biobehavioral
HIV prevention
strategies.
Is that what you wanna fund, conservatives? You
currently are through Trump's administration. That's about $881,000
that went. But interestingly, they put that back
they took money back, it looks like, but
still about a hundred thousand dollars for the
program.
That's where it lent. That's where it ended
after February 21, and it is still ongoing.
This one,
HHS,
AIDS United.
Up here, it just says national capacity building
assistance for strengthening HIV
sin, syndemic systems and services. That's the broad
point. But it says providing TA on harm
reduction,
transgender, nonconforming
community services, social detriments of health.
That is for
$1,200,000
as of March 12.
This one is from HHS,
and it looks like the highlighting went away.
What was this one for?
So this one,
they spent 1 point almost $1,200,000,
March thirteenth.
And it says,
Fundacopar
oh, that's in Spanish. It says, the emergence
of the AIDS epidemic coincided with public health,
reformation reformulations,
definitions and guidelines,
saying that they're originating from the UnitedHealth System,
which provided universal, equitable, and comprehensive
health
services. That is is while the detection rate
of the virus in general population is point
four, talking about I think HIV still saying
the transsexual woman, transvestites,
the the rates all they're mentioning there. Given
the gaps in the Brazilian cascade, I I
just think that was basically the point to
make sure I didn't miss anything.
Improved engagement of transgender populations with health services.
But, again, generally around the HIV testing, which
why we'll be funding that. Why are we
funding for HIV
prevention testing in Brazil?
Because I don't think that's what it's really
about, guys, unless they're preparing for something else.
2 mill $1,100,000.
This one's HHS
for
1.2
it's it's close amount, $1,270,000
on March 12, and this one is for
u c
UCSF
Center of Excellence for Transgender Health.
Last one, and there's plenty more, by the
way. There was probably 20 different tabs just
under grants. This is for a hundred thousand
dollars,
And it reads, National Research Center on Poverty
and Economic Mobility.
It says a multifaceted
fellowship program that places researchers on-site at HHS.
Find that interesting. It says these efforts will
greatly expand and diversify the core of the
cores of poverty researchers
working on questions related to equity, inclusion,
diversity,
and access in economic mobility and human services
policy and will put actionable findings and data
into the hands of federal agencies to inform
policymaking.
Well, again, it's again, like I said before,
it's not about good, bad, left, right. You
can decide for yourself. But I think it's
pretty clear that most conservatives wouldn't agree on
spending around equality, inclusivity,
diversity, and so on. That's what they that's
the buzzwords they love to use as you
just heard in the clip we were showing
you before. So same point, guys. You know
as well as I, if this was on
any other if if an instruction Barbie shared
this, well, I who knows? Maybe, actually, they
would push back and ostracize
her from the community because how dare you
share the facts around bad Trump. But the
point is you know as well as I
that this went through a certain channel that
this would be huge, and it should be.
Somebody else put it out there. Don't even
do don't even give me credit for it.
Take the video. Make the point information out
there. Get it out there. It's important that
this gets seen to show you how completely
hypocritical this all is. I just thought that
was important to see because the reality
is it's not left or right, guys. If
you can see clearly that they're funding the
same things, ask yourself what that means.
Is that because they both want transgender health
studies?
How do we how could we possibly believe
that? It's about the narrative. It's about the
what they need to do, and this is
my opinion, to achieve the end.
That's the same thing they're doing to you
right now. And Trump made sure to tell
you that the ends will justify the means.
So by as long as we get where
we tell you you wanna go, then it
doesn't matter how we get there. Well, yes.
More than anything in the world, it matters
how you get there. Now
some positive things around health that I think
are important.
This is Robin Monotti shared this. This was
on the twenty sixth. That's today.
Jay doctor Jay Bhattacharya is the new a
NIH director.
He said, I will establish a culture of
respect for free speech in science and scientific
dis descent in a NIH. Great to hear.
Dissent is very essence of science. I will
foster a culture where NIH leadership will actively
encourage different perspectives and allow expression of disagreement.
Great. That sounds fantastic.
Well, if that does come to pass and
he continues to do that going forward, then
this is fantastic. But I do wanna point
out
then just to be clear, I think this
is a major positive step in the I
mean, I mean, especially since we've seen who's
been there before, whether a Collins or a
Fauci character,
this is a major positive direction. But I
will point out there's a lot of people
in the whatever whatever you wanna call it,
the people that were calling out COVID nineteen,
largely the doctor side of it, that have
some concerns. They'd rather just
there's a lot about what he might do
that seems a little bit too close to
mainstream for me as well. That doesn't mean
maybe maybe I'm wrong. Maybe he's right. Maybe
we we just disagree. The bottom line is
I do think this is a good step.
So we'll see what goes forward. But just
like we've seen with RFK, if all of
a sudden they start rolling out mRNA shots
or they start studying the same things with
a different narrative and we're doing it the
right way, then I'm gonna call it out
like we all should. I mean, if you
if you agree. My point is, like with
the mRNA cancer shot direction, I don't care
if it's the right person doing it for
the right reason at this point. I don't
believe that what they're doing with that is
where we should be going right now. And
that's why I express my opinion about it
as my right to do so. You can
be feel free to disagree, and if I'm
in the minority, then that then that's how
that works. But I argue that most people
in this country, for obvious reasons,
are dramatic I mean, more than most topics,
are adamant that we do not wanna go
in that direction, especially right now. At the
very least, that we wanna look we want
this to flush out way more before we
start rolling out platforms for children. Right?
So on the note of him again, I
think this is a major positive step. But
we'll have to wait and see if there's,
you know, more of a bait and switch
around it, just like we should with anybody.
That's not to say that that's what we
expect. Right?
Whether like, that's why I would say, like,
if somebody who I wanted to begin to
power
suddenly or rather, I've
as if that's what I want in the
largest sense and I'm forced to live in
this society, if there was somebody that took
power that I thought was a better direction,
as I keep telling people in the partisanship,
I would make a point to be more
critical of them than anybody
because I expect more from them. That's just
the way this should work, guys. You should
be holding their feet to the fire because
you expect the best.
Now on a point of overlap in regard
to health, and that this will roll us
into the alarming direction of where this health
direct the, you know, the
AI mRNA
great reset health direction that seems to be
rolling out despite different narratives.
We talked about this on Aim Wake Up.
This is what everyone's been calling this out
and rightly so as we're I mean, there
has been basically zero challenge on the mRNA
direction Or even just the COVID shot, guys,
despite that being a central point of his
entire direction,
before he took power in the Trump administration.
That is, like, the one thing that people
expected that hasn't happened. Not a single pushback.
In fact, they've rolled out mRNA shots or
working on them with Moderna for a bird
flu. They've also conditionally approved, I think we've
even more than that now, bird flu shots
for animals. Like, this is a this is
we all know that's not the direction. But
he wrote on the twenty fourth, instead of
inspiring universal condemnation,
October 7, of course, for the podcast, you
all probably expected that, you know, the health
and human services director focused on health and
Maja would lurch into October 7 for the
forty fifth time at that position. Right?
It's just it's
anybody logical is going, why are we why
is he from that go on. If you
wanna talk about these things or make these
cases, that's fine. We have a right to
do that. But he is standing there as
the
as somebody in this administration from a position
of health and making statements through that about
October 7, like he did about the antisemitism
task force, calling it a plague and try
trying his best to kind of conflate it
with this position, but it no way made
sense.
The universal condemnation instead of that, even though
it did though, by the way I mean,
look. The vast majority of people, including those
that recognize that anybody occupied has the legal
right to arm resistance, still condemned the crimes
that were committed. The fact that they still
lie about that shows you how desperate this
all is. Or the fact that we had
evidence before and well after that there was
foreknowledge here, allowance of some kind,
ignorance, choosing to ignore what they saw coming,
none of them wanna talk about this. Or,
you know, the major elephant in the room
that Israel has been provingly funding Hamas in
some way or another right up until October
7. How can something that central and that
wildly verified not be included to this point?
Because these are dishonest people or compromised.
That's what I think.
And that does have to be in every
single category, but definitely right here. But it
says the October seventh holocaust, he says, triggered
a global wave of antisemitism.
The holocaust so literally has not con it
continues to support the ongoing genocide in Gaza
or Syria or Lebanon,
but has the nerve to call what happened
on October 7 the holocaust.
Right? I mean, think about how insulting that
is, especially for the real people in history
that have gone through an actual holocaust or
realizing that most of the people that died
that day were killed by Israel. These are
facts, ladies and gentlemen. Their own media have
covered this, but they don't
care. Ivy League campuses became a greenhouse for
poison. See, I'm using the word that kind
of make this feel like it's somehow in
the health vein.
And and, you know, the global wave of
antisemitism?
No. That's been approvable. I mean, even Israeli,
even Orthodox Jewish communities have called this out.
They called every Palestinian flag an antisemitism event.
The ADL was literally caught for that. The
400%
increased number that they all view, that's what
they're pointing to. That was
the vast majority were Palestine support,
and they lie about it to this very
day just like they lie about atrocity propaganda.
I mean, we just heard Schumer again or
even Trump. They keep yelling about beheaded babies
or rape allegations. These things have been proven
to not have even happened
by Israeli media
and everybody else, by the way, all the
way back to the beginning.
But says Trump
has ordered his cabinet to use every constitutional
tool
to uproot his diverse yeah. Every I mean,
seriously? You know why he made that point
to say constitutional? Because it's quite literally the
most unconstitutional thing I've ever seen a well,
I shouldn't say that. But it is one
of the most unconstitutional things I've seen a
president do so publicly and so brazenly,
which is we'll go into that today. And
he says, I'm glad Columbia has agreed to
this first step. You know? But don't forget
the Columbia University where the dean is literally
a former Israeli spy, and that she is
married to the head or at one point
was the head of the UN mission to
Israel. Right? That's where I said it's confusing,
though. Israel's
presence at UN, he was the head of
it.
She married that person. And there's another overlaps,
by the way, with Israel to her. It's
it's it's that that doesn't have to prove
that she's compromised.
Certainly matters when this is all about Israel.
And take the first step and we'll begin
to restore itself as a garden of tolerance,
reason,
compassion, respect.
I mean, this is why in a lot
of ways, this government and and the this
country has rapidly become a laughing stock of
the world. And that's not something I say
with pleasure, guys. That makes me sad because
the reality is most people recognize that a
lot of Americans, if not most, like I
do in reverse for other countries that this
government lies about, they recognize we don't agree
with this, with a lot of it.
Nonetheless, what they see every day, because that's
what they want people to see, is the
ridiculous, cartoonish,
idiocracy that is the partisanship.
That's what we see in the world, and
they laugh at us. They laugh at how
easy it is to manipulate Americans that Netanyahu
proudly says more than once on video, how
easy it is to just play them against
each other, and yet it still happens. Because
frankly, the people that do it and are
involved in it, most of them know it
and don't care because they're benefiting from it.
But here is what Glenn said. What does
any of this have to do with make
America healthy again? Combating chronic disease and childhood
obesity, eliminating big pharma and big ag capture
of US regulatory processes, ridding US food supply
of toxic additives, and everything else we were
told Maha would do. Now there's been some
movement in some of those directions, that just
being objective about it. That is true.
None of which I would argue has officially
changed something indefinitely
other than I mean, even the sunscreen direction.
I we're we haven't seen any real change.
We've heard Stink stated.
That's not to say that I mean, even
I'm I was very happy about what he
said about that and the the motion's beginning,
but we haven't seen the trickle down happen.
We haven't seen the actual agencies, the FDA,
for example, really do anything.
So is he just a figurehead and he
be he's been neutered by something else?
You tell me. Wait. When we see something
really begin to transition, then you tell me,
and we'll point it out.
Problem is, this is what we seem focused
on right now. I mean, in the chat,
you tell me. Genuinely, not is there something
that has that has been rolled out that
is we've seen actual change. Now I'm not
saying whether we think it will happen or
that, you know, the goods thing has been
said or even a a
legislation has begun. Have we seen something begin
to change in our lives where we actually
if that's what we're doing? I haven't seen
it.
Now on top of that, we have things
like this continue, whether it's a, you know,
forget the person's name that at at you
know, in regard to our health, the person
put in position that is all about seed
oils. Right? Which is totally the opposite we're
promised. Or the, I'm kinda blanking it. There's
so many that you just blank on these
things every day. Gosh. It's incredible how many
contradictions and and lies there are. But now
we see the example of the CDC director
nominee Susan Monares.
As Champagne Joshi points out, oh, look. Here's
Trump's new CDC director,
appoint a nominee on DARPA TV.
That's what it is. Literally, discussing how AI
will accelerate better health outcomes.
Gee. It's almost like they're coordinating in one
very clear direction, guys. This is we're we're
take we're gonna go into that in a
second. They this is where it's all being
funneled.
I almost wanna make that title today, but
I didn't have that much of a focus
on it. Just this is the AI direction
for everything, guys. This is what's coming. They're
not even hiding
it. And here's what David Icke says. Well,
here's the thing. They're not hiding it because
they know that they've
effectively got the partisan screamers looking everywhere else,
which then they draw most of the people
looking too.
He says they he said David Icke says
they are taking the piss. This is Trump's
vaccine, in quotes, obsessed nominee
for head of the CDC. Because that is
the case. Look at her comments around masks
and lockdowns and vaccines.
This should scare everybody that cares about any
of this stuff, guys.
I'm going to bet you anything, you're gonna
get excuses and justifications
from the insurrection Barbie catcher inner circle around
Elon Musk. And I say that not in
the sense of the real I mean, the
the people that are most out there with
millions of followers yelling just whatever it seems
they want. They just not fact based information.
Not we are the media now. Just basic
text on Twitter, Twitter files nonsense,
half the time which turns out to immediately
be false, and it all just continues forward.
Get your COVID booster, she's talking about, pushing
AI health care exactly in line with the
AI control agenda. She's been the deputy director
of ARPA h, which don't forget we talked
about that a long time ago. ARPA was
how it originally rolled out, and then and
that was Biden or rather just Democrat side
of it. And then Trump rolls out with
his daughter, the ARPA h, because it's totally
different, not the same thing. But that's the
simple way they made you think that it
wasn't the same. It that's it was the
continuity of the same pro program through left
and right. Same thing came out. They just
gave you a little bit. They put the
h on the end because we're that easy
to confuse.
And then it says and it's based on
DARPA. That's obviously same point, but, like, the
on health side of it. The technological development
arm of the Pentagon manipulating for total AI
control, DARPA. And this is the health side
of it. So if you don't see how
this is developing, guys, it is it is
that that same agenda. That's what COVID nineteen
represented in one part.
Now that's why Derek wrote about this in
regard to the Stargate program and how why
this is kind of the central rollout starting
point of a lot of this, which is
why it was such a shock to most
conservatives because it's the exact opposite of what
was promised.
Trump partners with technocrats to promote mRNA injections,
AI, and transhumanism.
SoftBank, which, again, watch this show if you
don't remember. Like, I mean, it is a
cutout for Israel in a large way. It
it they they they basically back the the
vast majority of their start up 8,200 connected
start companies around the world. That's a start
SoftBank. They're also the chief financier of the
entire Stargate project. And I I think he's
actually the the director
or one of the leading positions. But then
you've got Larry Ellison, Oracle,
of the group that has been scooping up
all of your data ever since the beginning
of COVID nineteen. That was the pharmacovigilance,
which we've never gotten to see. They promised
they wouldn't use it like this, and now
here we are. Then you've got Sam Altman
with OpenAI,
which, by the way, was
part that were Elon was a part of
that. They claimed to have separated even though
they're part of the same administration. It it
seems obvious.
Most of what we get today seems like
noise and distraction.
But as I called it,
the AI biomedical control grid, because that's really
what I think it comes down to. That's
what this is the same conversation from my
show that I talked about Stargate.
Now an interesting overlap to this before we
get into
specifically the
digital ID save act kind of,
shell game, if you will.
Teachers of Choice put out a really interesting
article or just conversation about whether or not
your biometrics, which op we've been talking about
this for so long in so many different
ways.
What does it
mean? You know, what what does it mean
for them to have all of your biometrics
on file? I like I say every time,
I don't think we even I don't know.
I don't think any of us know what
that means truly
in twenty years, in five years, when we're
in
some dystopian technocratic society, or let's just say
a rapidly advanced technological direction?
What does it mean for some kind of
company to own
what makes you you in a biometric sense?
And also have access most likely to all
of your medical data, all of your face
scans, all of your which I guess same
thing. But basically, what it would take to
recreate you in some sense, whether in the
real life or digital twin.
Now who knows? Maybe that maybe that's crazy.
Maybe it'll never happen.
But why do you think they're so desperately
trying to scoop this up? One side of
it is for control in regard
to social credit, in regard to digital IDs,
in regard to accessing the Internet, or any
kind like, look at what's going on in
China. We have to see how clear this
is. It's not secret. Right? It's not
some conspiracy theory. It's literally happening in some
places in the world that they point to
as their model.
So will Maha, he asks,
protect your biometric data.
Seeing as how this is where it's rushing
into,
I don't think that's even in on the
table right now.
So he says from biological markers to smart
bassinets.
What does it mean, guys? This is getting
crazy from, like, the smart fridge. Like, it's
getting to the point to where everything everywhere
has some kind of sensor relaying information back
to something.
So biological markers to smart bassinets for your
baby. Our health privacy is being invaded.
Frankly, I think that happened a long time
ago. But what does Maha think about this?
He asked. And he says, who controls and
owns our data is a critical question in
2025
and beyond. When it comes to health, we
need to think about data and tracking,
not just in terms of our personal medical
records, but also wearable technology,
our biometric privacy invasion, which is drastically on
the rise. This type of tracking is now
emerging from the cradle to the grave quite
literally.
Will this invasive tracking make America healthy again?
Kaldi Means, a new and prominent leader in
the Maha movement,
is the founder of a company called TrueMed
that is designed, excuse me, to create new
incentives for alternative health care options.
The company assists people who to secure
insurance funds to subsidize healthy living options.
Through this system, the cost of your gym
membership or vitamins can be reimbursed through your
insurance and as can many other genuinely healthy
options. You know, sounds great. Right? Now
maybe it is all great. Maybe this is
just not, you know, the next part. Maybe
it's not what you know, who knows? Think
for yourself about it. The point is,
typically, when there is a problem, if you
think that's one of these here, these kind
of things are used to get you you
know, it's it's the it's the window dressing.
Right? And in some cases, they are there
and it is good. But right behind it,
there's something much darker they don't want you
to see and they hope that will distract
you. I'm not saying that for sure this.
You can decide for yourself. But that's what
you always have to ask.
Right? Are they really destroying USAID or are
they just pretending to to roll out something
far worse? Are they really taking down the
Fed, or are they just rolling out a
privatized central currency? You know, these are the
things we have to ask. And I think
both those were yeses, but you can decide
for yourself.
But he goes, sounds great. Right? But one
of these, quote, healthy items is what they
call the smart baby SNOO, which is a
AI powered bassinet for your newborn.
I mean, think about the kind of stuff
that that's gonna be giving them.
Literally cradle to grave. Right? But we're talking
about the the way you're you're you're grow
you know, the way you're evolving as a
child,
scanning your biometrics as you have grown because
they don't get that stuff right now. Let's
realize that these are what a like, for
example, what Elon will get to in a
second is doing with the AI using your
privacy data, your government data to train their
AI models. The point was, you know, that
data is gold. They don't you don't get
that kind of data anywhere else because online,
people can lie. You know, what they get
back there is, like, double confirmed. Like, it's
important. I went through this another show, but
it's important for actually getting data that is
more confirmed and more accurate for them to
fully train this out. In this case,
it's they don't get biometric data from newborns
and as they develop. That's something they don't
have for the most part. So this is
a way to get that. Now maybe you
don't agree with that. Either way, you know
that this is what is going on. The
spying, the relaying of information, they're not even
hiding that anymore.
I mean, do they even pretend it's for
your better service to improve the quality of
your service anymore? I don't think they claim
that. I think they don't even care. Most
people check these boxes or don't even read
terms of service. I mean, who there's, like,
11 pages on these things with tiny writing.
Nobody ever takes the time because in most
cases, you already want the thing when you're
going to that process, and you don't wanna
go, well, never mind. You you you want
it for some reason, so you just check
the box. They know this.
We need to start doing better. But
it says, TruMed promotes this product as does
Kaylee Means, who shares it in the stories
of his personal,
Cali personal Instagram account. The baby SNU uses
an AI algorithm to constantly monitor your baby
to determine if they are sleeping comfortably. See
my point? That means full scans, constant, which
by the way means whatever else comes out
of that, whether radiation or or any kind
of other EMF, it's
not something we should ever be having constantly
around your child. A lot of or a
Wi Fi or anything like that, guys. We
need you need to think about these things.
These have very clear effects.
It says if your baby cries,
the baby snoo will determine what rocking pattern
and which particular sound of white noise is
best suited to get your child back to
sleep.
Right? So no no less human interaction.
Baby SNEW uses microphones,
motion sensors, algorithmic processing, and feedback loops to
implement a plan to bring a crying or
fussy baby back to sleep. Now see, that
sounds great for people who just don't wanna
deal with that.
In some cases, it probably is a lifesaver
for parents that are so tired. They just,
you know, that that's what they're hoping for.
Microphones, motion sensors, you think for one second
that's only gonna be aimed at that baby?
Guys, we've already gone over this a hundred
other ways. Now by the way, on a
side note to the Tesla point, in case
that was missed, and I don't actually think
I said it on the show, but we've
talked about this forever. I mean, Vault seven
and before.
And what but my point was not only
Teslas are spying on you, for crying out
loud. I think damn near every vehicle is
spying on you right now if it's past
a certain year. The point was about in
the context of the Tesla conversation. But that's
a good point, Kate, because I don't think
I said it that that's the case, and
it's everything.
So in this case, it's this like we
know,
it's not just aimed with wonder it's spying
on everything.
Your reactions, your your heart rate, that's the
biometric side of it. You know, how you
respond to things, what makes you scared, what
makes them what makes them angry, makes them
sad. This is
alarming in ways I can't even articulate.
Now it says, this data can be synced
to an app on the parent's smartphone to
keep track of the baby's sleeping patterns.
Here's the link if you wanna read more
from this. And it says,
he says, I I do know parents who
have twins, three kids or more, some with
disabilities who have used the baby SNHU, and
it helped them. And I I of course
it will, guys. You know it will. It's
gonna alleviate some of the issues. They're gonna
give them more time. Like, you know, it'll
it'll give it'll take some of the of
the pressure off. But he goes, however, I
believe TrueMed's real product is a data collection.
I mean, guys, that's what they are. If
you ask any of these companies what their
true actual profit is, it's the data. That's
that as Corbett wrote so long ago, data
is the new oil
because that's it's the most profitable thing on
the planet, it seems.
And since I believe TruMed's real product is
data collection, and baby SNHU feels like a
future data grab. And he says, of course,
TruMed does not own that deal only in
baby products. One of their premier products, Lines,
is called the Levels or just Levels, which
is a glucose monitoring system with an app
that tracks internal biological markers monitoring blood sugar.
Now, again,
maybe that's a huge development for people with
diabetes, and maybe it helps you tremendously.
But recognize that I think they don't care
about ultimately that. They care about the amount
of from a high level aspect, the amount
of internal biological
data, the metrics they get from this.
And that's not that's just that doesn't even
have to be conspiratorial.
That's just what it is today. That is
the model that these businesses recognize.
Since today, this company is valued at over
$350,000,000
and has been wildly successful. The level system
involves a wearable sensor called a continuous glucose
monitor that you wear on your arm, which
looks almost like a nicotine patch. The CGM
is paired with a mobile app that helps
users interpret the continuous data it produces. That
data can be shared by Levels members all
around the world.
Majority of the initial funding for Levels came
from a powerful firm, guess what, Anderson Horowitz.
Excuse me. Andreessen, I guess. That is the
Andreessen that we know that's tied in with
Palantir and all the rest of this stuff.
And Trump's administration and the whole thing, guys.
The same entity
who is I mean,
what they just I mean, the same overlap
with Karp and the conversation he had on
on Joe Rogan,
basically arguing that elitists need to rule the
world because they they're the only ones that
can there's no such thing as real democracy.
It has to be an oligarchy. That's how
history shows us and that we need to
be the people in control because it's best
for you.
And ultimately, the elite the good elites need
to fight the bad elite. That's what they
were laying out for you. And literally kind
of sliding back to this Machiavellian worldview, right,
that this is that the ends justify the
means. It's the same point they all seem
to lean into.
So do you think that for them, it's
about helping people with diabetes?
It says who initially gave $12,000,000 of funding
to the startup back in 2020 and more
in subsequent years. To understand and 2020 seems
like an interesting time for that. To understand
what the future of levels will be, we
would be wise to know what the future
looks like through the eyes of of Andreessen
Howards Horowitz. Essentially,
the firm sees the future as what I
call a biometric AI data dystopia.
AI wearables, digital ID, biometric
biomedical laboratories in outer space, and a resurgence
of nuclear power. The document all also discusses
AI super staffing in health care.
You can read through it yourself.
The point is this is their general direction.
And so even if you don't think it's
nefarious, the point is that that is just
recognize that's what it's really about. Is that
the future you want? And if not, then
stop leaning into these companies that are utilizing
your data to get there.
Now here's a clip. Oh, you know what?
I forgot to grab this. I wanna play.
This is her this is just a clip.
I think we played this before of of
Ellison speaking.
He says an even bigger co a corporation
we need to watch when it comes to
biometric invasion is Oracle.
Excuse me.
Larry Ellison is the founder of Oracle, which
is one of the two largest health care
data management companies in America,
the other being Epic. Ellison is also a
principal stakeholder in Stargate.
OpenAI is a partner in this venture, and
Elon Musk has offered to purchase OpenAI for
$97,000,000,000.
I don't think that happened. It's led to
controversial battle now unfolding in the courts.
Recently, Larry Ellison start stated star, stated
to a provable count public health, quote, you
have to take all of your health care
data, your diagnostic data, your electric health records,
and move it into a single unified data
platform for AI to be able to analyze
all of it. Right? The idea being that
if we can do that, we can help
you more.
I mean, if we really think that what
they're doing is to save I mean,
I'd love to believe that's the case. I
just think it's wildly naive to think that
that's why they would do this. There's no
profit in that. There's no control in that.
And if you look at their actions, if
you look at what they're doing, it's obvious
why in my opinion.
He said, I would argue Ellison is lying
here. I don't believe the goal is a
single unified data platform for all health information.
I believe the goal, he's speaking, I believe
a goal is to monitor and surveil the
population to control us. I happen to agree.
So here here is this clip.
And then what it's somebody else talking about
from not familiar with who it is, but
I believe they're connected to him.
But the point is about
Ellison speaking
and just kind of blithely discussing this as,
like, the what the future should be. And
I frankly, I don't know even I I
would argue that the vast majority of either
side doesn't really think this is where we
should be going.
Let's listen to Larry Ellison
at the Oracle Health Summit in late twenty
twenty four. This was the October
in 2024.
The interface, and I'll stop with this one,
the interface to the system is not typing
and typing away and pull and and having
menus.
If you want to pull up someone's X
rays,
you say the following. Show me Larry Ellison's
most recent X rays.
Actually, you say Oracle.
Show me Larry Ellison's most recent X rays.
So, obviously, the point he's getting into is,
like, a future situation, right, where this, you
know, where and this to understand this, they're
all very adamant about this, yet where privacy
is really no longer a thing. Right? Where
this is important because we all need access
to it so we all can be better.
Doesn't that sound a lot like the great
reset, you'll owe nothing and be happy kind
of idea? Right? Where so they're they're the
idea of ownership is gone because it's better
for it's the same damn direction, guys. They're
all in the same that's why Trump and
Malay and the rest of them went and
spoke at Davos. Sure. Everyone got focused on
how he said bad no. Pronouns are bad,
even though he supported them and everything else
and is rolling out the same program and
Elon Musk is rolling out all the rest
of it. It's and and this is my
point from the beginning.
That's why people laugh right now about the
partisanship, about how and what they see as
Americans, which I don't believe is the majority,
but the world looks at last for how
easy it is to manipulate these people.
Show them that's not the truth. Right? Show
them that's not what most of us think.
It but you speak to the system.
You speak to it.
When you show up at the system,
the system looks at you. You don't log
in.
The system looks at you and says, hello,
doctor Bell. What can I do for you
today? It it recognizes you.
The authentication is biometric. There there are no
we're getting rid of all passwords by the
end by sometime next year.
You will not be able to use a
password to log in to any Oracle system
because they're they're too easily stolen.
They're not secure.
Instead, we'll have biometric authentication that just recognizes
you
and logs you in based on that. Oh,
much much easier to do and much safer.
Yeah.
Right. Well, is that is that not exactly
like we've like, the World Economic Forum videos
we show you about the biometric, you know,
mental,
brainwave
monitoring? And, you know, it's the same idea,
guys. There this is you sit down and
the system just it's
so here, understand this.
The world that they're talking about would not
be that that's just your computer, guys. That
means wherever you're going, these systems will be
recognizing who you are by scanning you. This
is what China's dealing with.
Is that what you want?
That's currently the power the people that are
packed behind Donald Trump is what they're doing
whether you want it or not.
Now the important overlap to this is just,
you know, reasonably quickly only because I don't
I'm gonna wait for more development on this,
but I think it's important to show you
that how this has continued because we've talked
about this a lot. This is in regard
to the Save Act conversation, the Real ID,
ID twenty twenty, all these different parts of
the digital ID rollout.
Healthy Family Projects wrote this article entitled illegal
at many levels,
Trump's new move restricts voting rights without proper
approval. Now that's this is not what I'm
ultimately focused on. I think it's an interesting
deviation as always, sort of like the other
conversations we were just pointing to, where the
false paradigm,
left and right media,
go at it from this weird false binary
within a binary, like, where they're ultimately arguing
about what but the point to me, I
think most people that are beyond the partisan
game,
is not about whether we should be debating
whether illegal pea people here illegally should be
able to vote. Isn't it? And it's like
it doesn't make any sense. Like, it it's
it's the same as them it's the same
as Trump and them trying to argue they
can deport somebody without due process. The point
is you're just disregarding the reality.
Not that you're dis disagree. You're just ignoring.
In that case, if they're here illegally, they're
not a citizen. That's technically again, they shouldn't
be able to vote. It's very simple.
Now that's the that's a different conversation of
of whether people should be,
you know, voter,
identification for certain processes, which I also agree
with, but point point the to the point
that's different than that. What we're talking about
is whether or not illegal aliens are allowed
to vote. Because there are I I agree.
It's insane that we have people in congress
or people in power that are arguing that
that that's the way it is. And it's
like, well, okay. If you agree with that
or you think that, then you should be
arguing. Your process should be to change the
legal reality. But they don't.
They just disagree even though they're fundamentally wrong.
So in this case, very clearly siding with
whoever is arguing that, obviously, it should not
be okay for people who are not citizens
to vote. That seems like a no brainer.
That should but they that's what they're basically
discussing here. So So I think it's a
like a red herring. It's a distraction.
As as Donald Trump has signed a new
executive order that sidesteps congressional approval process, which
that does matter, by the way, that the
over the weather whatever it's about, that's the
same general point about executive orders or the
idea they can just write this on a
piece of paper and act like that changes
things that are not necessarily
exclude only part of the executive branch. It's
just it's an abuse of that power. But
that's everyone. That's every partisan side going back
as far as you can look since executive
orders have been really become a thing.
But it says, in order to attempt to
restrict voting rights, which yeah. You know, see
my point from beginning. I think this is
not the reality. But it says the order
borrows heavily, this is what I think is
important, from the Republican based Safeguard American Voter
Eligibility Act or SAVE Act,
which appears likely to pass the house but
faces uncertainty future in the senate. So the
SAVE Act, which is necessary to roll out
the Real ID compliant, all going back all
the way to 02/2005 after the Patriot Act
or rather, you know,
after 09/11 discussion. Right? That's where it comes
from, and they've been trying to do it
ever since.
Arguably, it seems like it's not really gonna
come to pass, and that's why I think
Trump has now wrote the wrote the executive
order to make this happen.
It says nor the order directs the bipartisan
election assistance commission to change the federal voter
registration
form to require voters to show proof of
citizenship.
So right again, right there, I don't understand
why that's an issue for people. Doesn't that
seem like something that everybody should you know?
That makes sense. I mean, the reality of
whether or not you're a citizen should matter
whether you can vote in a country. I
think that's pretty obvious. But it says such
as a passport
to a local state official,
to a local or state official, but Morales
Doyle said he cannot tell commissioners to do
to do what cannot tell commissioners to do.
It's weird. But it says, the order provides
a limited number of ways to prove US
citizenship such as US passports, an ID that
complies with the Real ID Act. So I
just wanna make sure you saw it. The
point is that it's it's continuing to lean
into that side of it, which I think
there's a coming step, which is going to
invalidate anything other than what's digital for obvious
reasons we'll get into in a second.
Different arguments about why that is unsafe or,
you know, whatever it is. But now all
they're doing is continuing to cement in my
opinion that real ID compliant identification
is one major part of what's needed to
be used
as they then continue to try to invalidate
other aspects.
Now Catherine's take on this, and this is
just him discussing somewhat of this, and this
is, Gunther saying, Trump just doubled down on
calling for more secure elections, which, by the
way, neither Catherine nor I or I don't
think anybody is disagreeing with in a in,
you know, in an honest sense. Proof of
citizenship,
voter ID. Now that's the different part of
this. Proof of citizenship is quite different in
the ways that they're going with this than
voter ID. One day voting, paper ballots.
Now what's interesting about this is he does
discuss paper ballots in this larger point.
But if that's the case, then why are
we even talking about the digital ID overlap?
In a sense, if that's what they're pointing
to, that's what real ID is.
But here's what Katharine says.
Nope. You fell for the trap. If you
read this, it is an unconstitutional
push to sabotage states' rights,
which, by the way, that is a clear
point though in regard to states' rights and
their decisions in regard to how certain processes
should go. That's the real point of how
this country was set up. The federal government
has to continue to scoop up more and
more power. We're seeing that today in this
administration more than ever in this history of
this country.
But that's, again, not what I'm really focusing
on today. And it says and create a
federal digital ID system, which is what they're
doing. You can see it in everything else
they're doing right now, which will be used
with digital money, I'll point that out in
a second, to turn you and your families
into slaves. We do not need federal digital
IDs to have free and fair elections.
Fine to hold states accountable to do so.
Now this is my point as always. I
hope I'm wrong. Consider that I'm wrong.
But as always, I think the census to
he really leans into in a lot of
conversation points about paper ballots when they they've
really never had as much before.
Hey. Maybe that's what it will be. I'll
support that. The problem though is that I
think that's being floated on the surface of
this because the background is really about something
else. Now she picks up on it too.
And it says the notion that we need
a federal digital ID is a demonic lie.
Only embrace it if you want a the
mark of the bee system that will make
the people who use it
to privatize US assets very rich at your
expense.
Now, here's the actual executive order.
Oh, I think I well, I think I
had to highlight it, but I'm I'm not
gonna try to the the it's basically what
we already discussed. Preserving and protecting the integrity
of American elections. I did have a lot
of highlight on this, but I don't wanna
try to read through it. It's long. The
point was, oh, really, just to highlight the
fact that it is discussing the
I Real ID compliant identification, citing all the
way back to the Real ID Act 02/2005.
What they're doing today is just really trying
to reiterate it again through a new act.
But, oh, that was one yeah. That was
one thing I wanna show you. So the
one thing I thought was interesting
is they talk about
federal laws prohibiting
foreign nationals from voting, which is obvious. That
just that means anybody here who's not on
you know, somebody who is here not illegally,
but then not a citizen. Same point. There's
no I don't see why would anybody argue
that should be somebody who's voting.
But it does says prohibits foreign nationals from
participating in federal, state, or local elections making
any contributions or expenditures. I thought that was
really interesting for many reasons.
So just to rightly point out,
here,
and it's not just APAC, by the way.
Because, I mean and let let's be clear.
APAC is not an American organization. You can
literally look that up in its origins. It's
not hard to see. People just lie about
it like they lie about everything around Israel
today. But just from APAC side of it,
APAC tracker points out and by the way,
it's more than 14. It's now over 16,000,000,000
if it account for the other aspects like
the 1,000,000,000 that was sent right right in
the beginning, for example.
But Trump has approved, he they say, over
14,000,000,000 in military aid to weapons Israel. But
if you roll down, you're
gonna find that Trump himself,
$230,000,000.
JD Vance, hundred and 60 7 million dollars.
Marco Rubio, over a million dollars. This is
APAC tracker. I mean, it goes on and
on. All of them. Pretty much every single
one of them are either, like, outrageously pro
Zionist to the point to where it's
America Second without question, or
they're getting straight funding from from an Israeli
apparatus. But here's the oh, and then by
the way, let's also not forget Miriam Adelson,
one of an open Israeli oligarch, who is
also a US citizen, by the way, who
gave him a hundred and $6,000,000
now, at least on the record, in regard
to allowing them to illegally annex the West
Bank, which they've already been doing.
But the the main point to make about
any of these
is APAC or any of the rest, and
you can look this up, in a lot
of different ways. It's important to recognize that
these groups
basically funnel money from Israeli entities, and this
is very public. Right? So whether it's APAC
or any one of these different PACs that
exist inside this country, just look up all
the different PACs that are founding Donald Trump
or any of them for that matter, and
and then look into them and recognize they're
just a cutout
for and that's why those things exist. So
you can have people all over the world
with other oligarch and and elitist interest who
could funnel money through what appears to be
an American thing to US Politicians.
So if if let let's just say they
decide to stop all that, I will cheer
him in that one point very heavily. That's
a great thing, but I don't think that's
gonna happen. I think it's about pretending that
that's the other side doing that. He wrote
it down in executive order, but he's still
currently taking money from those exact things. So
seems to be hollow to me.
But back to this point, I'll include the
show for you to read to watch if
you wanna understand the ins and outs of
the act and how it relates to specifically
real ID, but ID 2020 as well.
This over so that that was my point
on that. So they're they're rolling this out
under the guise of or rather, let's just
say, to be objective,
they're talking about voter ID, voter registration, proving
identity, and so on, which is obviously interconnected
with this larger point. And you can obviously
see from a large government perspective, left and
right for multiple administrations, that they're leaning into
digital IDs. It's been happening through Trump, through
Biden, all of them. So now that they're
talking about that, it's hard to believe that
it won't go in that direction, especially since
they include the real ID overlap, which, let's
be clear again, is about digital ID. I
mean, that's why they used the digital services
to switch into Doge because that was about
using Internet, IT, you know, technological solutions for
the for bettering the country or whatever how
they frame it. So they just took over
that. It's the same thing. It's all about
AI and digital. It's that's what this has
all been so far and clearly what their
direction is. So then Catherine adds another point
to this, which is Trump's moving at high
speed to try and end financial freedom by
promoting an all digital monetary system.
Now, again, that's her opinion. I agree with
that. The order is a little bit more
nuanced, but the point is this is one
more step in that direction. If you've been
paying attention,
it's one step after another. It's the boiling
frog, guys. The totalitarian tiptoe to point to
David Icke. It continues.
March
25.
This one
says, the continued use of paper based payments
by the federal government, including checks and money
orders flowing into and out of the United
States general fund,
imposes
unnecessary costs, delays, and risks of fraud. Interestingly
enough, in the video, he's talking about paper
ballots. One of the things he argues is
that by using paper ballots, we can save
a lot of money. So I think it's
funny that in this context, you get the
exact opposite argument.
By not using the paper, now we can
save a lot of money. So how much
you wanna bet that at some point, very
soon in the future, they go from paper
ballots and say, well, we gotta save more
money. So let's switch that into digital versions.
Let's wait and see.
But it says,
mail theft complaints have increased substantially ever since
COVID nineteen pandemic. Historically, department of treasury checks
are 16 more times to, you know, to
be stolen and lost. Now it says that
the that or that or altered than than
electronic funds transfers.
Maintaining the physical infrastructure and a specialized technology
for digital paper records cost the American taxpayer
over $657,000,000
in 2024 alone.
This order promotes operational efficiency by mandating the
transition to electric payments for all federal dis
dis disbursements
and receipts
by digitizing payments to the extent permissible under
applicable law. I have this very interesting.
He makes a point in parentheses to say,
but not
for avoidance of doubt
to establish a central bank digital currency. I
just think that's great. It's funny that it
that it's like in the past, that'd be
like them saying, but totally not for, false
flag of banter. You know, something that's like
they would argue as conspiratorial.
It just shows you how much they're definitely
paying attention to what people are talking about
and especially his own base. And that's exactly
why I think they were always going for
a privatized version and not a central bank
digital currency. Because as Catherine's pointed out, at
Whitney or plenty of others, it's way worse.
It's the same problem on steroids.
It's you know, think of total information awareness
turning into Palantir. It's the privatization
of the government rollout, guys. It's what it
is. And so he makes a point to
say that so all of his followers go,
see? He said, no. Well, that's we agree.
That's not what's happening. It's something worse.
But he goes, the secretary of treasury shall
support agencies transition to digital payment methods, and
it just points out digital wallets, other electronic
payments.
And it says, agency shall coordinate with the
Department of Treasury to facilitate a smooth transition
to digital payments. Now this is one part,
guys. Now you could argue it's just one
part. That's where it'll stop. I hope you're
right. All we're pointing out is the incremental
steps in that direction like we've always been
telling you is coming.
Now in the I I overlap, which all
this connects,
this is, you know, every previous of these
three things we just showed you. From the
digital ID to the digital money to the
they're all incremental steps in the direction of
this outcome. And And this is the show
we did called the impending future of AI
government, but who controls the AI? That was
March 8.
That we go over this exact discussion, and
this goes back to the thing like, we
we knew at the time. They rolled out
what's called the GSAI
bot, which is an artificial intelligence bot for
the General Services Administration, which is insane.
We don't know who's we we don't the
point is we don't know who's behind all
of this.
These are privatized aspects. Somebody by the way,
let's recognize that Elon Musk,
he's not sworn an oath to the constitution.
He's not been voted in by people of
this country. I mean, but not Trump, by
the way, also didn't swear on or rather
on the bible, I meant.
He didn't take a he didn't swear an
oath, you know, on Musk, but neither did
Trump, by the way. He didn't put his
hand on the bible, I think is important.
I always did for the moment it happened.
Even though despite him standing right next to
it with his wife holding it, I found
that weird, especially with all that's going on
today. But also the fact that Elon Musk
is a person changing more than I've ever
seen in ways that in many cases have
turned out to be worse
objectively,
is not actually there by anybody. I mean,
he doesn't have to you know all this.
There's no conflicts of it. There's no admission
of conflicts of interest. There is no ethics
pledges.
There's no information about who's behind him driving
what. It's insane, and he has more access
and influence than anybody right now.
So who controls the AI as they're rolling
out programs that have access to your personal
data that could potentially change what you may
be getting, taking, everything in your life when
it comes to government interaction.
Especially as we're watching people that all of
them seem to continue to support a genocide,
in that in that alone should give you
insight into who they are and what they
think and what they may do,
let alone whether they're giving access to things
from other to other entities.
I think these are obviously valid questions.
It's the same thing. You know? You know
what's funny? It's to say and these are
not to say we prove that we could
prove via x, y, and z or China
or Russia or Israel.
But you know as well as I that
when this was Biden in power, these kind
of things were floated without any evidence or
even anything to go on more than once
every day in order to say that he's
working for China or he's working for x,
y, and z. And the same people that
would jump at every shadow are refusing to
see some of the most obvious things I've
ever seen in this field.
That's alarming.
Now this is from February. We've already pointed
to my point of this, but I wanted
to reiterate it. Elon Musk ally tells staff,
AI first is the future key government agency.
Sources say the former he's a former Tesla
engineer, by the way, is now in charge
of the technology transformation services.
It's weird how many people seem to be
tied back to Elon or people tied back
to Peter Thiel. And it's it'd be really
need to ask yourself what the real infrastructure
is.
In a Monday morning meeting, Thomas Shed, the
recently appointed, in February, technology transformation services director
and Elon Musk, Ally, told General Services Administration
workers that the agency's new administrator
is pursuing an AI first strategy,
which we all know is showing you how
alarmingly rapid this is happening in times when
we don't even know what's going on. Automating
different internal tasks and centralizing data from across
the federal government. So more centralization of information
flow about you in many ways that absolutely
have already been shown to violate your privacy.
They don't care. I'll make they'll say that
again in this article, which we already talked
about. That's directly from Shipp himself that says
they're prioritizing the direction even if it violates
privacy.
Many of Musk's associates have migrated to jobs
at higher levels of the GSA.
So that's weird to me. So remember, this
person has not been elected. He's not sworn
oath of office. He did not do any
of these things. And he is putting people
in positions
that are that are that come from his
background.
Mister Shed was a software engineer at Tesla.
His particular focus, sources say, was an increased
role for AI, not just at GSA, but
at agencies government wide.
So if you believe that they this is
AI just doing, you know, computing what's best
for everything,
even that
needs data input from people that can influence
it. But what if it's what if it's
more than that? You still have to understand
that or or even less. What if it's
just
a a a front for them just inputting
what they want you to hear? The point
is we don't know.
And it's amazing that this is happening in
such a rapid way without any influence from
people. Like, even if you wanna believe that
you actually influence, that you vote in people
to act out your collective will. I mean,
guys, this is not even no no one
even talked about this before this happened. Were
they telling you they're gonna use AI to
revolutionize the government? No.
So it's happening for somebody who hasn't been
elected in a rapid way without anybody's influence.
I don't know why that's so alarming to
everybody.
Maybe it is.
The development of AI coding agents that would
be made available for all agencies.
So, basically, AI bots that are carrying out
instruction,
and they're doing this for all these agencies.
And the problem is we've already seen what
these people have done.
The Trump administration, Elon Musk, Doge, almost every
single direction has been met has been, you
know, coupled with, you know, firing people but
then rehiring them or
deleting the wrong contracts or finding out people
were sent to El Salvador who weren't actually
criminals or or even here illegally.
Right? Or there's always been whether it's just
meant to be over clumsy for an agenda
or that they're just being irrational,
clumsy in the interest of just
fulfilling what they think is a promise met.
So my point would be if you're gonna
start deploying these things and we already see
that they keep, you know, whether they even
do the right thing in some way, they
end up chopping off things that don't need
to go or you know, it's that has
happened almost every time.
And that does affect people's lives,
particularly around finance tasks that could be automated,
it says.
Quote, this does raise red flags, said a
cybersecurity expert. He said people, especially people who
aren't experts in the subject domain,
like these people that are, you know, coming
into this field, who might be engineers in
other context but haven't worked with the government
finance side of things, says coming into projects
often these kind of projects often think this
is dumb and then find out how hard
the thing really is.
Right? So this kind of you get that
kind of hubris, and you've already seen this
from these kind of people where they act
like they know better and they lop off
all these things, and all of a sudden
it turns out, well, I guess we did
need some of that.
Now it says he suggested that the federal
government needs a centralized data repository. Now that
seems like everything else we're hearing, isn't it?
For your benefit,
to reduce government, we need a bigger centralized
government. Does that make sense? Although it wasn't
clear where the repository would be based or
if these projects would comply with privacy laws,
Shedd, and we already told you this before,
referred to these concerns as a roadblock
and said that the agency should still push
forward and see what was possible. He said
at the time, we're gonna go forward anyway,
and we'll we'll deal with that when it
comes along. So the privacy was an afterthought.
That can that is consistent with everything Trump
has said when put to, you know, second
amendment conversations,
whether, you know, done first due process later,
or what we're literally seeing him do in
regard to people's first amendment rights or just
do constitutional rights. I guess, in this case,
fourth and fifteenth amendment.
So that this is clear what they're doing.
The direction is obvious. Now James Corbett put
on an excellent show on March 24
around something we already referenced. He said this
in an interview I caught, and I just
it's been it stuck with me. Remember, it's
called the al algocracy,
which is basically government through algorithm or more
so, as he says, means rule by algorithm.
He says, in this important episode,
James Corbett, he says, it's a word that
we would do well to become acquainted with.
And as you will discover in this presentation,
algocracy is being seeded into the public consciousness
right now by very very same big tech
brologarchs
who are now in a position to implement
their plan for locking down society in an
AI run dystopian surveillance nightmare,
otherwise known as the golden age.
So the point is that these very people
who are packed behind Donald Trump
are rolling out or, I mean, rather, what
he's pointing out is seeding the idea of
why this is what we need. Sort of
like Andreessen talking about the elitist and how
we need some kind of an oligarch control
structure because that's what they're
all drifting you in this direction.
Now this is a story, Ross' story put
this out that I thought was interesting. Now
this is you just decide for
take this with a grain of salt.
Because I think it's obvious that there are
political,
agendas everywhere.
I mean, realistically, we're all we all have
our biases. That's clear. But within the partisanship,
it's just cartoonish today. But the why I
think this is interesting is because I really
consider that this is happening.
Like, I've already seen things like this. Not
to say that I know their intentions, but
I've very clearly seen what you could all
you would call mistakes that work in their
benefit, for example. But this is arguing that
they're creating problems to then point to to
justify what they want, which in this case
is the privatization
of this group.
Now
that, guys, is like one zero one government
operation.
Problem reaction solution. I mean, that's what they
do everywhere you look. Right? They destabilize an
economy, then turn around and say, look. They
can't even keep their people fed. We need
to swing in and help them. They do
it with Iran every other day. So you
have to at least consider that's what they're
doing here.
Quote, creating a fire.
Insiders suspect Musk of deliberate sabotage to fuel
a long term plan. Now the obvious point
is these insiders are people that from the
group from the Social Security Agency that he's,
you know, upsetting.
So you could argue they clearly have they
could have a bet a motivation to lie
about him or maybe just a motivation to
tell you the unpopular truth because they're upset.
You can decide for yourself or maybe many
other options.
So it says, insiders at the Social Security
Administration are accusing Elon Musk of deliberately sabotaging
the agency as the changes he's demanded to
protocols have resulted,
and this this is true, in repeated web
page crashes
and inter
inter meanable phone waits, like endless phone waits
for beneficiaries.
Now, this is one example of what we
were just talking about because this is happening.
And arguably, what they're doing
is causing more problems. Now maybe because they
didn't they thought they could fix it a
different way, it didn't work out, or maybe
this is in the interest of long term
solving it. Who knows? My point, though, is
that it's we're as they roll these things
out,
I don't think they're truly taking into consideration
the potential issues. Because every time it happens,
they can blame a Democrat. They can act
like it's part of the prod. People just
seem to go along with whatever the narrative
is today in an alarming way.
But these people are claiming that what he
might be doing is deliberately sabotaging it, just
what they say is gonna come next. It
says the interviews with Washington Post, current and
former SSA employees
said they believed Musk and his minions at
the Department of Government Efficiency were trying to
break
Social Security to private to justify privatizing it.
That is an interesting thought. Now putting aside
the partisan discussion,
you know, for a lot of the partisan,
they probably stopped listening after watching the post
because that's how blind these people can be.
The point is, you should not disregard anything
just like you shouldn't blindly accept anything. We
should be considering all of it. That's what
intelligence is. The point though is that privatizing
it is interesting from an objective nonpartisan perspective
because that's what always seems to be happening.
And it's usually under the guise of some
partisan back and forth. Now it says, they're
creating a fire to require them to come
in and put it out.
And the post also documents how the changes
demanded
by Musk have severely
degraded the service quality.
Now e even if it's not in the
interest of privatizing
it, they could be just to simply make
it look as if it's problematic, which is
why they need to be there in the
first place, to rationalize their existence.
Alarmed lawmakers are straining to answer questions from
angry constituents in their districts, it says. Calls
have flooded into
congressional offices. The AARP announced on Monday that
more than 2,000 retirees per week have called
the organization since early February, double the usual
number, with concerns about whether benefits they're they
paid for during their working careers will continue.
Says senator Angus King echoed SSA insider's charges
that Musk and his minions have been running
a campaign of deliberate sabotage against Cornerstone Social
Insurance safety net. Their argument being, which I
is clearly true in some cases, that there's
abuse happening. People that are dead still getting
payments. But you see, if they what we've
already seen, for example, they go in and
start chopping things away, well, it's already shown
that they are could be overzealous
if even being accurate at all. And people
then get chopped away that didn't deserve to
be, and they just kinda brush it away
as they're all Democrats. And anybody speaking up
gets called a shill or a Democrat.
It's crazy.
That's not to say that we shouldn't be
going after abuse. We see that's how this
works is that they use the excuse of
going after that to to hide something bigger.
Not to say that's what this is for
sure, but that is what government does.
This is what's going on in the destruction
of the agency from the inside out. It
is accelerating. What they're doing now is unconscionable.
So decide for yourself if you think that's
what's happening. What we do know is that
there has been issues for people that don't
rely on this,
and I don't think that's in their concern
right now.
Now he points out on the twenty fourth,
XAI is the only major AI company with
an absolute focus on truth, which is just
so funny to me. Truth, especially in the
partisan field, which he seems to be a
leader of today, is wildly subjective. They all
think their truth is the truth, which is
just sad.
So whether that's the case or not is
completely so object you know, questionable.
But the I mean and by the way,
I think it's pretty much we'll show you
in a second actually based on Grock is
simply not true. We've already proven how clearly
what they're doing. They lie to you every
day about things, and they're the ones inputting
the out the the information.
But it goes rigorous adherence to truth is
the only way to build safe AI and
the only way to understand the
true nature of the universe. You know, while
they lie about what they're doing overseas, while
they lie about what they're doing with Doge,
while they lie about any number of things.
Like, get away from the American political field.
Lying about what's going on in Venezuela. Getting
caught lying about what happened during the election.
Right? Over and over. These are not debatable.
It was on the record. Even even the
community notes called them out. So if we
know they're doing that and not and refusing
to address it and continuing to lie to
you, these people are not honest. That's simple.
But Chebo says,
then why does Grok routinely harvest assessments from
the utterly diluted and grossly inaccurate Wikipedia? Which
it does.
Fake news, news media, and baseless anonymous posts
online. Well, guess what? Grok chimes in to
answer that question and says, Grok, built by
XAI,
likely uses Wikipedia as a data source per
user reports and research
despite Elon Musk's criticism of its accuracy. Now
it says Wikipedia's reliability is debated. 80% accuracy
but prone to bias. I flatly disagree with
that. Raising concerns about Grok's truthfulness. That's what
it says. XAI aims for factual AI, yet
Grok's reliance on such sources speaks sparks controversy.
Just even his own system is going, well,
I don't know about that. The point is
it's simple that this is about training you
to think what they tell you through these
things are the truth versus the other one
telling you the other thing. It's it's basically
your technological,
you know, false binary, your
illusion your two party illusion with AI.
Meanwhile,
as we debate about these things, they're using
your privacy your private information,
violating the law to train their AI models.
This is from this is, from congress.
They're asking for, you know, answers for why
they're using Doge or rather feeding your private
data to Doge
in order to train their AI program, to
unapproved AI systems. That's what we were just
telling you before. They're rolling these things out
through their
twenty somethings team,
many of which have weird you know, thing
things that don't seem to show in any
way that they care about caring about your
privacy as they've already been caught sharing things
behind the scenes about things they see through
Tesla cameras.
I mean, the and that's many of the
people are working with him right now, laughing
about what you can see on their picture.
I mean, guys, these people are the kind
of people that would laugh about Democrats and
take advantage or vice versa.
And these people are having access to $6,000,000,000,000
databases and using this to train their AI
systems, which are gonna be rolled out to
control you, it seems.
It's terrifying to me, and it's very real.
It's very obvious, and very few people seem
to care.
Now,
to roll this into Sephora policy,
and by the way, another element of the,
like, you know, one of the pillars behind
this rollout
that they're literally training these models in real
time on the military side of it in
the ongoing genocide with Palantir.
Benjamin
Netanyahu pushed this out today or rather twelve
hours ago. So
yeah. Today still. It says Israeli democracy is
not in danger.
It the Israeli deep state
is in
danger. Well, gee. That sure sounds familiar.
Isn't that interesting? Now let's be real, by
the way.
It's obvious what's happening. I mean, it's it's
unreal.
Most of his own people, most of their
government, most the entirety of it they're they're
all they've been calling him out as a
criminal for decades.
And every time it gets close to where
something might happen, oh, god's a war and
things pop off. And then because of the
way he set up the illegal the broken
system,
he's they they everything has to be put
on pause.
There is no independent judiciary. That's obvious. That's
been pointed out by everybody. And despite your
US Politicians claiming that's the only reason that
we don't have the right to go after
them with the ICC and ICJ because of
the independent it's not true. They do not.
They have broken the system to a point
to where they are I mean, what they're
trying to do is roll out this, I
mean, Zionist guided, obsessive situation where most people
in the country, even though they support it,
think what they're doing is alarming.
That's read Israeli media, guys. It's shockingly obvious.
The point though is that I think right
now they're trying to he's trying to argue,
though. This is not we're not through to
be clear,
e even US media and Israeli media have
been talking about the destruction of what they
call Israeli's democracy. That that's why that comes
up.
But it's not in danger, he says. It's
just the bad deep state that's in danger.
I simply said, now you see where The
US gets its talking points,
or maybe you see it the other way
around. The important point is these are wildly
corrupt governments,
both trying to reconsolidate power by convincing you
they are finally stopping the very corruption they're
trying to save.
That's what this is.
I mean, it's it's almost embarrassing to have
them roll this out now while that's been
what they're pushing here. Like, that's been Trump's
thing. Like,
the unification
of these things is alarming while Trump has
gone
I mean, it's I I hate it's it's
the same as Biden. It's just the the
the over the top verbal support is different,
but they're both blindly supporting. This is a
US genocide.
You cannot decouple these things anymore. I said
it the other day. As Americans, we have
to realize our government is not just supporting
it. It is committing genocide.
And now he wants you to believe that
by pointing out any of that, you're part
of the deep state.
Simple, isn't it?
Well, in regard to other distractions, what happened
to the Epstein files? I guess we just
moved on from that. Right? Well, as Kim
Iverson points out, to which she's been called
a anti Semitic racist Jew hater 75 times
in the comments, even though she doesn't even
mention that. She's only talking about an Israeli
passport.
She says, isn't this the Trump admin who
the Trump admin gave the Epstein files to?
And here she is flying on March 25
to Israel. See you soon with an Israeli
passport.
There. That's that's that's all the point is.
You can decide for yourself what that might
mean. It's not saying Israeli passports are bad
or that everybody Israeli is gross. There's no
one saying that. In fact, I often say
does not mean every Jewish person ever Israeli.
The reality is it is obvious there could
be a problem there when you recognize what
they're trying to cover up in those Epstein
files and recognize that they seem to handpick
a lot of Zionists to roll out what
didn't even happen.
Yeah. Fair point.
Or how about the JFK files?
Funny. I mean,
we were just talking about this more than
once.
As Corey Hughes told you, which seems to
be the case, it was you didn't need
anything new to know what already happened. That
was the main point. The evidence was there
from before, which is, in his opinion, airtight.
Israel was responsible. CIA was involved. Now
the new information
didn't change any of that.
Everything he says everything that we now see
in that was already public, if not things
that were irrelevant to who actually killed JFK.
So what it was, it seems, was pacification,
a distraction, bearing people and information while they're
doing everything else, which is what has been
done, how it's been used every time before
this.
But even this time, I didn't even get
a lot of the we usually get the,
oh my god. This did everything. Trump saved
the world. We didn't even really get that.
So I'm getting the sense that even a
lot of these, you know, maybe in between
the team's sport politics and conservative side are
just kinda, like, losing their their illusion is
being shattered, baby. I hope so. Because it
seems obvious that this was not what they
promised.
This is a great clip from Decentive News.
Finally, Samuelsayeni
gets called on even in the new administration.
He asked a very important question, and the
way she responds is so telling.
I I I always forget how it goes.
New boss. Meet the new boss. Same as
the old boss.
That's where we're gonna go. And in the
back that I hear JFK because interestingly, I've
no one, we haven't brought that up yet.
So let's let's give that a try here.
Yeah. Thank you. Who who is who is
who is Yeah. Yeah. JFK. So who is
keep saying JFK? Excellent. Thank you. And the
alright. Let's do it. The JFK assassination's obviously
back in the news, and Jefferson Morley of
JFK facts was on Bill O'Reilly's show analyzing
some of the documents that Trump administration has
released.
One of the revelations that he discussed was
the fact that James Angleton, the CIA counterintelligence
chief, had relied on on Israelis as part
of his intelligence,
gathering operations, which included monitoring Oswald prior to
the assassination.
Very quickly, just recognize that he fair he
pointed to something that was released in the
JFK files.
So completely pertaining to JFK file release, just
to make that clear, because it's funny how
she responds.
It's indisputable that he kept him under surveillance
for four years from 1959
to 1963.
These new documents point to an Israeli connection
using Israeli agent to monitor Oswald. As you
may be aware, JFK in the summer of
nineteen sixty three was deeply concerned with Israel
acquiring nuclear
weapons.
He had sent a series of letters to
Ben Gurion, Israel's founding prime minister, demanding that
Israel allow inspectors.
Ben Gurion resigned just when he was pressed
on the issue. I got something I can
say to this. Yeah, I do. You want
me to say something? I have a question
for you. Israel continued stalling any inspections in
GK, was, of course, assassinated in November.
Every president since has adopted Israel's policy of
refusing to acknowledge the existence of Israel's nuclear
arsenal.
My question to you is, will this administration
finally do so? He's asked that so many
times, and they've never responded.
Boy, that was we went from JFK from
and then to now Israel. Yeah.
And it was
blatantly obvious why it connected. And the fact
that she had to do that shows you
that she's trying to dis she's trying to
pull to make it look like that was
erroneous.
Even though he's literally cited, this is the
JFK file, this is what it's released, and
that that it's very obvious. You know why
she's not that you know why they're responding
this way. It's obvious to me. That was
we went from JFK from and then to
now, Israel, you are so know Israel has
to be fair enough. I I I understand.
I understand.
What I here's what I will tell you
about the JFK files.
Wow.
Is I'm not asking about the Excuse me,
sir? Yeah. Please. Thank you. About 80,000 pages
of unredacted records related to the Kennedy assassination
are currently being released, and I think that
they've finished at this point,
by order of president Trump.
We know that also as I'd been asked
before, if there was any other material anywhere,
this is it. This is all the material.
It's out. And, again, unredacted,
and so that's good news. For my generation,
this is also good news, sir. That's not
true, by the way. I don't know why
they keep saying that. There's there's been there
was a lot that was redacted.
Ain't that insane? They just lie like that?
There was not. We we talked about it
on the show. Certainly, as you grow up,
with that kind of a dynamic that happened
in this country, and now, of course, we're
happily we happily can say that,
Robert f Kennedy junior is is, contributing to
the nature of our nation and making a
difference as well.
As far as the speculation
and conspiracy theories about what was happening regarding
that, assassination and in the decades that followed,
I have no comment for you, and nor
am I going to speculate or comment on
that. But I appreciate being here and, asking
that at the end. Yes, sir. Go ahead.
Thank you very much. Go ahead.
America First. Yeah. Please. Please. Let's let's keep
going. You're you're Thank thank you, Tammy. On
Bangladesh, I have two questions. God.
See, that's where always I point out if
you if why if you cared,
the rest of the journalists in the room
should be like, answer the question. Like, all
that's all it takes, guys, is for everyone
in that room to stop being an absolute
passive follower and say, but, see, they're access
journalists. They know they know they want the
access over the facts.
The point should simply be,
answer his question. I'll wait. Go ahead. What
is the answer? You know what I mean?
Like, if everybody did that, then she'd probably
walk off and it would make a bigger
point.
The obvious reality,
guys, is this is clear. What they're doing
is sidestepping the obvious point because they do
not want to address what everybody in the
world knows, what even Israel has been forced
to admit more than once. So ask yourself
why they wouldn't just admit it.
It's there's something with
you could argue it's because they're not allowed
to
or able to.
I it's it's actually pretty crazy to me.
So she tries to and then she tries
to downplay it like conspiracy theory about and
she wasn't just pointing to the the nuclear
aspect. She was talking about the JFK conspiracy
theory. Like and what they put out even
also as I mean, they're what they're trying
to do is gaslight their own supporters
into pretending, like, only what we want you
to talk about is what actually happened and
everything else is a lie. Their own supporters
aren't following that line.
I just it's this is desperation, and I
think what it has to show people who
are being honest with themselves is something else
is in this and they're they're not interested
in what you want, what their voters want,
or what their supporters want, or what America
First is.
They just want you to pretend that. That's
why they keep giving you the talking points
and showing you the direction. Walk right there.
Be
find the courage to call it out. It's
been I just can't see. I've never seen
something this obvious.
Now
overlapping this with Yemen
and really the signal discussion, which I think
is just
ridiculous today. I wanted to point this out
as we roll into what's actually going on
in Israel or Gaza as well, but Dave
DeCamp points this out. Imagine a foreign country
flattening an apartment building in The United States
because an American general entered it, because that's
what they're claiming at least happened in the
chat, which, by the way, we shouldn't balk
at. They do this every day around the
world. Israel probably did it seven times since
we started talking today, where they they claim
a Hamas member was in there, which is
what they've been doing in Gaza. They just
said that, by the way. In the tenth,
I'll show you in a minute. There was
a Hamas person.
As we said from day one, it doesn't
matter whether there was a high it's still
a crime. You're still bombing a location
in a nonmilitary context because you claim somebody's
there, or at the very least, even if
they are, you're killing all the innocent people
around them. This is not it's collective punishment.
It is not how this works.
And so at this point, all you have
to do is stand back and think about
it in reverse. If you think that makes
sense, then if you then you can argue
that any other group that date that decides
to declare US military terrorist organization, which, by
the way, if you wanna start floating hairs,
it's a hell of a lot more logical
to call that group a military or a
terrorist organization than
arbitrarily naming people who support Palestine Terrorists. The
point is both of them are broad stroke
and ridiculous, but, clearly, one is responsible for
a lot more murder and death. But my
point is that you could pretend that by
that logic, they can go US terrorist group.
Okay. And then now that that person has
entered that building, we could bomb the whole
building. And they bomb a building in
Texas and kill a bunch of people. Is
is that okay with you? If you don't
if that's not okay with you, then there's
logical inconsistency there,
obviously.
But it says never in a million years
would Americans think that was the acceptable and
not and not regarded as terrorism. The problem
is the people on partisan sides that want
to push back are gonna say, but he
was a terrorist and we know that.
Yeah.
Okay. So then you're okay with Israel funding
those terrorists to be there, and then they're
gonna go bomb Israel? No. No. No. That
that one doesn't count. Or the fact that
you're taking their word for what is a
terrorist and be it's a choice.
At the end of the day, we know
that's how this works, and we can prove
there's a lot of people that they call
terrorists who aren't terrorists. So at the same
point, it's a choice to take that line.
But he highlights the signal chat, which was
released after the fact, the bigger chat.
Just in case you don't I've already talked
about other shows.
Whatever that was, in some level to me,
has to be coordinated. That's my opinion. I
mean, it seems silly. I mean, as I
said on, I I think I was on,
Holmes left recently. I don't know if you
put it out yet. The point is we
were talking about this, in my opinion, is
that I don't see how this couldn't be
coordinated in some way. And then, ultimately,
what it usually does is get you debating
or arguing about how
instead of whether it should be done at
all. Right? So instead of debating whether or
even why, why are we bombing Yemen right
now? Why are we innocent murdering innocent people
in civilian locations? Instead of that conversation, we
have the debate about how it's done or
whether we should be leaking information about wartime
situations.
Very deliberate in my opinion. But that doesn't
mean that everybody involved was aware of that
or even all of it. I don't I
don't know. But what I do think is
interesting is the points people make is that
based on the way they discussed it, it
did make them look really stupid. They didn't
look really you know, some it's hard to
think it's not in some way real. But
the bigger point is as you get the
bigger picture of this oh, and then don't
forget that the Atlantic guy, as I'll point
out in the briefly in the moon of
Alabama article
I'll just show you right here, actually.
Where was that?
Oh, what? How'd that happen?
There it is.
Sorry to go back one. So Jeffrey Goldberg
dropped out of an Ivy League university
in order to volunteer to be an I
IDF prison guard during the first intifada,
during an ongoing
arm of this genocide,
murdering innocent people,
decided to leave his school to go be
an IDF prison guard. That matters, guys.
But
the point is that's the guy who gave
who supposedly got accidentally included in all of
this and then carefully coordinated this release. And
what you're gonna get from the partisan sides
or the corporate media, all of it, is
never highlighting that these people seem to be
on the same side of things.
Right? Only arguing that, you know, he's an
evil Democrat and he shouldn't be included or
the Republicans and that that's always what they
bank. They hope you'll fall into the partisanship.
But here, all you're seeing is that they
are openly discussing
killing people in an apartment building because this
guy walked into the building.
That's it.
Now this guy says, if you hang with
terrorists,
bad things could happen to you. Same if
you hang with criminals. And right it says,
if you hang with terrorist,
I think it's a translation thing, bad thing
you can happen bad thing can happen to
you.
This guy is in some kind of Assad
headquarters somewhere. Same if you hang with criminals.
So I said, well, what, well, well, you
see, most Americans still understand and fight for
our inherent rights outlined in The US constitution.
But thank you for at least being honest
enough to admit you don't feel the same.
Shall not be infringed.
Two party illusion.
To which he responded, you're welcome.
And I corrected him. I said, you misspelled
your, and I he just responded. Oh, never
mind. Every time. My point is I'm just
being a jerk because the guy is being
ridiculous. But the point simply that it's amazing.
Now I don't think this is I think
this was probably let's look. You know, not
a probably a bot out there on this
platform. That's not even a hard thing. This
these days, it's like the flip flip of
a coin. It shouldn't be something we act
as like a broad like a to consider
whether what you're engaging with as a bot
right now is a very plausible thing. Not
that we should assume that. My point though
is that there are Americans out there
who take this weird line where
everything in the constitution is the most important
thing in the world until it becomes our
political narrative to basically disregard that.
Both sides do this. Whereas right now, it's
like, well, he's a terrorist. Well, that doesn't
change the constitutional reality, guys.
That that you're just falling into your status
mindset and going, but they said so. They
know better.
Well, then apply it logically. All that means
is you don't believe in constitutional rights or
you don't acknowledge your inherent rights that have
always been there.
Well, I'll include this Moon of Alabama article,
which basically he makes the argument that it,
you know, like I I basically outlined already.
That's where I was kinda taken from. The
article entitled this was this quote leak accidental
or is it a pro war psyop? Now,
I think it's kinda both is what he's
highlighting. Is it ultimately is being used, but
it's hard to think that some of this
wasn't in some way real.
But I think it's more distraction than anything
else. I'll also include,
from the Ron Paul report where they go
over that article and the larger conversation about
this, including Yemen, but also what they call
signal gate.
Silly.
Good video, though. Now Menchel sent just simply
post this saying, during the night, the Yemenis
launched, this was yesterday, missile and drones toward
the USS Truman.
Now what you note, which I point out
every time, how many times have you heard
that?
Have you seen any reports about one of
these ships sinking? Have you heard any reports
about any American casualties, which by the way
include injuries too?
No. You haven't.
Ask yourself how that's even possible.
And since they launched a number of drones
toward Tel Aviv, Well, and and I'm specifically
talking about the ship in the USS conversation
in the shipping lanes.
Mahdi says, how come they never have a
direct hit on the aircraft carrier? And then
Joe says lots of defense layers, which is
true, but this is my point. And
also because they've deliberately trying to avoid casualties,
at least as they've stated.
That's what they've said, and clearly, there's not
been any. I said, we hear a lot
about deterrence from the West as they bomb
civilian locations and kill people. Well, this is
what it actually looks like.
It's all about stopping the genocide. Right? So
they've been telling you, we're not trying to
go after anybody than other people that are
supporting the genocide. That's why other ships aren't
affected.
That's been clear. They don't wanna point that
out because it makes them look like they're
liars because they are. But on top of
that, that they have been continually doing this
to stop, to deter, to avoid, to turn
them back, not to attack them, which is
what The US and Israel do without blatting
an eye. They'll bomb an entire hospital, take
down an entire building or a car full
of people because, you know, like we just
saw, because one of these guys walked in.
You need to recognize the difference here as
they're literally calling these people pirates and terrorists
for standing up for what's right in the
world, in this context anyway. Not to say
good guy, bad guy. In this context, they've
consistently shown you they're doing this. And even
when it comes to the the agreements, when
they certainly have a ceasefire where they might
see an end to it, they stop doing
it.
You just can't there's no air in it.
You can see what's happening.
And antiwar.com,
full signal chat reveals US Officials celebrated bombing
a residential building in Yemen because they did.
So that's one of the reasons why I
find it hard to believe that they would
put that out there because it makes them
look like the monsters they are. But who
knows?
Now here's why I put this out today
because I thought it was funny, but it's
also because it's true.
Secretary Rubio on twenty fourth said The United
States will not tolerate
any third countries,
which I don't know what I think they
made third I mean, it's funny they would
I I didn't think I should think about
that.
Third countries or their oil companies producing, extracting,
or exporting oil and oil related products with
Maduro.
I think maybe they mean, like, through a
third part. I don't know. Like, third world
country maybe, what you're not supposed to say
anymore. You know, whatever. Like, not in a
sense that's, like, a woke thing, but because
it doesn't even apply. Like, the logic around
that was some kind of manipulated thing from
a long time ago. And, arguably, I made
that point before that if you look at
what the metrics were for what they call
a third world country, the US government, the
US, like, the America
has met those metrics for a very long
time. It it's not necessarily about how it
looks on the presentation. Right? Different conversation, but
it's worth looking into. The
wealth gap, the, you know, the prison system.
I mean, everything they use, it's pretty much
what's happening in this country. But, anyway, the
point is,
I already made this point about how they're
gonna go after Venezuela and why. Why all
of a sudden, right after this gang conversation,
that they all of a sudden started lobbying
these things at Venezuela? There's a bigger conversation
here.
Ask yourself why any other country has the
legal right, they don't, by the way, to
stand up and say, nobody in the world
can deal with Venezuela. Otherwise, we're coming after
you.
He says, this is a regime that has
consistently stolen elections, which, by the way, everybody
else in the world seems to disagree with
that. Maybe they have. I wouldn't surprise me.
But every time they make the claim, the
vast majority pretty much every election you know,
excuse me, election observer,
hundreds of them, both from left and right
governments, even from government to support The United
States, continued even US entities. One case, it
was Carter a while back, said they had
a completely on the up and up election.
And they don't like the outcome, so The
US cries foul like they do everywhere. Like
in Bolivia, where they said it loud, they
they've stole it. And then put in a
military control structure, and then nobody caught no.
That was okay. Democracy. Right?
It's just insanely obvious, guys. They don't want
this. That's why they don't care about elections
in Haiti, because they have control of what
they want there. They don't care. These are
liars. They're it's it's more provable than anything
we could talk about.
So for him to make that point is
embarrassing, especially since they point at the other
side. So let's even take this nonpartisan.
Aren't they telling you the Democrats steal elections?
So what are we talking about? Don't the
Democrats tell you Republicans do the same? It's
just just so ridiculous. But he goes pillaged
from its people. My god. If you wanna
see a a country that pillages from its
people, look at every system in this country.
But realize that that happens in every government,
including in Venezuela. And it says, and colluded
with our enemies.
So, basically, all that means is they work
with people we don't want them to work
with, which is not your right to tell
them who they can work with. So you're
a dictator. You're authoritarian. You are a pirate.
Any country that allows its companies to produce,
extract, or export from Venezuela will be subject
to new tariffs. There's your economic warfare, guys.
And any companies will be subject to sanctions.
So you're gonna sanction into private companies and
put tariffs on goods because they dare to
work with a country that you don't like?
Yes, guys. These are authoritarian monsters. Now here's
the point,
as a joke really, but it's exactly the
case. I said, Rubio is showing you how
pirates actually look every day he serves an
office.
How they want you to think pirates look,
a pirate or a hootie rebel.
How they actually look. And there you go.
Left and right and middle. You got Trump
and Biden and Rubio. And I could've put
Netanyahu. I could've put any number of people
there. That's the reality. These are the pirates
of the world, guys. They're literally
dictating what you're allowed to do with other
countries. They're stealing from the leader they don't
like. They're bombing and killing innocent people because
you're not I mean, it's just the imperfect
embodiment of what we understand to be a,
you know, the villain in the conversation.
Now and then just to add this somewhere,
because I wanna point it out. We recently
mentioned this.
I found this incredible.
So we we keep telling you that they're
hyping up the Iran nuclear weapons like they
always do. Despite every single time even US
intelligence, like we're gonna show you again, or
the state of state department or U A
the International Atomic Energy Agency,
they are not seeking a nuclear weapon. That's
not to say that they aren't secretly somewhere
we can't see. The point is the evidence
does not show that. And that that's not
that he is real. Snow is the evidence
we don't see. No. They keep trying to
pretend there's evidence, then they show you that
fake evidence, and that gets shown to be
false over and over and over. So if
there was real evidence that they had access
to, then why would they keep getting caught
lying about it?
Just to be objective, though, you know, who
knows what's going on? And, arguably, I could
say that there's a reason they would do
so today, but they've continued to say that
they have not done so because they their
religion
restricts that.
But US intelligence,
Tulsi Gabbard, says Iran is, quote, not building
a nuclear weapon.
US intelligence agencies have reaffirmed for the umpteenth
time that there's no evidence,
no evidence that Iran is developing nuclear weapons
or that Iranian supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, has
reversed his 2,003 fatwa, meaning they it's not
allowed, that banned the production of weapons of
mass destruction.
That's not just nuclear, by the way. And
it says the IC continues to assess that
Iran is not building
a nuclear weapon. And supreme leader Kimini has,
like we just said, not off not changed
that direction. Gabbard's comments were based on the
annual threat assessment,
which we we talked about recently, which is
released by the ODNI
with input from all US intelligence agencies. The
report did not did note that there have
been more calls inside Iran to reverse that,
which, you could look it up. That's like
Lindsey Graham saying something. It doesn't mean that
anything's actually changing,
which have grown in response to Israeli aggression.
That's my point. There's logical reasons why people
around are going, we need to change that.
This is what they I mean, look what
happened with North Korea. They started doing nuclear
weapons and they stopped bothering them. You know?
It's like you can see the logic there.
Nonetheless,
even Colsey Gabbard is telling you that's not
what's going on. And Trump is out there
with Vance and the rest of them telling
you that we need to go after their
nuclear weapons.
It's just it's kinda crazy what's happening today.
Now let's talk about Israel. Now this
video is harsh. I'm only gonna show it
with, no video, no audio. I just
don't think it's important these days to show
you all the graphic content. I think we
all know well what's going on over there.
But I wanted to make sure you saw
what's going on. That this is app this
is today, guys. Nonstop.
Every single day this is happening. Every single
moment in Gaza, people are being blown apart,
being starved, being tortured. It's constant.
That's why this is such a difficult thing
to keep covering and the reality being that
they don't seem to care.
Well, rather, we know they don't care. And
then frustratingly,
how it's possible,
everyone can see this, and most want it
to stop, and they don't do anything.
Francisca Albanese
says, I force myself to repeat it again
and again. The destruction of a group as
such of a people of a people as
such, a genocide,
can unfold in many horrific forms
through crematoria,
machetes, bombs, and more.
As in a reference
to multiple genocides.
Right? Holocaust,
Rwanda.
Rwanda being something Israel was involved in. Easy
to look up. Before, during, and after, armed
them with the machetes and with everything else.
It is not the method of destruction, she
says. It is the intent to destroy, annihilate
a targeted group. That that's the point about
whether the numbers don't even necessarily have to
be the case. It's just about the intent
truly.
Israel has so far chosen bombs, starvation,
torture,
allied rape,
and many other methods. Question is, when are
we going to stop it? Now, this is
graphic.
So just be aware of that if you
want to look away.
If you noticed, these are all people that
were praying.
There's seats, there's rugs out. I mean, these
are people these are people that were not
partaking. They bombed a bunch of innocent people.
It never stops.
This is this is deliberate deliberate torture and
suffering. This is meant to hurt and and
punish these people for existing.
I mean, I don't know how else you
can frame it. I mean, that's obviously how
I interpret this. But how do you explain
why this government can continually
murder people who are objectively doing who are
just
standing, praying,
collect collecting where they're told to go. Like,
it just never stops. Collecting around a truck
to get food that was supposed to be
delivered.
Here is Sarah Wilkinson.
Israelis are using extremely destructive high powered weapons
after footage of them striking a sibling and
family home in Jiblia in Gaza reveals. We
saw we saw one, I'll show you in
a second, of the tenth. That was a
couple days ago.
You
can see these right here, guys. I mean,
you could see what the these first of
all, what's happening in Gaza, right, it is
gone.
There's remnants of destroyed buildings. People are trying
to help, you know, find places to exist.
But these are they're bombing
people who are already destroyed.
So ask yourself why they need this kind
of munition and realize there's no narrative. They're
not going, we went after her mom. If
unless it gets international
discussion, they don't even care to give an
excuse.
You could see the kind of bombs where
you could see it right there. By the
way, that's the kind of stuff they're getting
from The United States.
Bombing this building
with very high explosive, and this it's killing
everybody in the building or everybody around the
building, and that's the point.
And these are areas where people are told
to go.
For example,
the tents in the area they're told to
go to to get away from the bombing,
which they're doing again, by the way. Leaflets
and dirt. Go here. Go there. And they
bomb all the places at the same time.
Not new. You already know this. It's very
easy to prove.
Here's the tents that they bombed.
Why would they need to use something that
big to go after a tent? Because that's
what they claimed.
They killed everybody in that area
every time.
The moment Israeli occupation warplanes bombed a refugee
tent camp in Gaza with American made missiles.
Had there ever been such savagery in history,
he says. This is the chairman of the
Europad human rights group.
Sadly,
this one's hard. I mean, you can
listen to it if you'd like to.
19 year old young man from Beth Hanun
documented his last moments of his family before
they were all killed by Israeli bombs.
So as I can't, my back is broken.
Children crying in the background,
you know, and they and they died.
These all these tire areas are getting bombed.
These people were buried in their homes, and
then they bombed again. That's how this works.
Now, here
are some doctors
that I want you to not I don't
want you to miss this because it is
I mean, realistically, if I've been only focusing
on this, this is probably thousands of doctors.
But every time I see a doctor that
speaks out about this, I try to add
it to it. And, you know, you this
is the ongoing thread that I've built put
together of what, like it's, like, 50 doctors
now, 40 something doctors, each one of them
telling you the same thing in some way.
Israel's killing children. Israel's assassinating doctors. Israel's torturing
and raping. Oh, and, like, firsthand
witnessing.
What more do we need, guys? Here's an
example. This is Mark Perlmutter, MD. Here's his
actual tweet. Last night in Gaza, we operated
on a 15 year old girl who was
riding her bike when she was shredded by
an Apache helicopter.
She I mean, who knows? Maybe US? Maybe
Israel? She will be lucky if she keeps
two of her limbs after twelve hours of
collective surgery.
And then look, this person with a Israeli,
whatever those are called, for October 7 says
lies.
This is disgusting. With 358
likes, people are disgusting.
And I said the ongoing US Israeli genocide
in Gaza. So here, let's let's look at
what she wants you to think are lies,
shall we? Here are some doctors we pointed
to before.
Now I think this was,
I know, I forgot. I was gonna look
up his name. I forgot. It's,
I'll I'll find it as we're going through
it. These two right here in fact. Two
of the very first doctors that I highlighted
on this on this thread. Here they are
speaking because
for two reasons, to show you that it's
continued, but also that they were they tried
to kill them. They literally that's this clip
here.
CNN interviewed them hours after Israel tried to
kill them by bombing the hospital they were
in.
First, here's is the clip they put out,
and then well, this was put out by,
it's right here.
Abir.
She said, I don't and this she just
quoting what they say. Oh, here doctor Mark
Perlmutter is one of them. Here's the clip.
Orthopedic surgeon colleague here who was,
taken out of the Operating Room. His fingers
were crushed.
They showed him a picture of his wife
from a spy, not not from a magazine
or an old photo, and, and they had
a metadata
and said it was taken the day before,
up close and said we're gonna bring her
here in front of you, and and we're
gonna gang rape her in front of you
if you don't admit that you're Hamas,
or we'll keep breaking your fingers. So in
case you don't hear that, they're coercing doctors
to admit they're Hamas or they're gonna rape
their wife or break their fingers or already
have.
And and this is and this is the
ground break the p the Hamas members that
were killing.
He still didn't admit he was Hamas, and
they said, well, then we're gonna send a
drone to your bedroom window and incinerate your
children, and he still wouldn't admit he was
Hamas. They beat him every time he, asked
to speak to a lawyer, beat him twice
as hard when they after he spoke to
his lawyer. My god. And he spent eleven
months in prison,
having probes inserted up as rectum by by
female,
IDS med members
who said that were the probe was soaked
in pork blood.
Doesn't that sound familiar? Remember how we showed
the Azov movement dipping their bullets in pork
fat because they were hit fighting Muslims? Like,
the this is there's there's a there's a
reason there's consistency here, guys. It's not hard
to recognize.
This is obviously coming through. I mean, you
could make it about Israel. You can make
it about Ukraine. You can make it about
The United States. You decide for yourself. I
think it's obvious what's driving the bus. My
point is the consistency,
the rate the racial hatred, the bigotry,
the unbridled hatred for people that are simply
different than them. It's just not hard to
see. And now you can as I was
telling you, raping these people
with rectal devices dipped in pork blood. I
I mean, where have you ever heard something
like that?
I just it's quite clear that there's something
wrong here and that your government, whatever it
is, is supporting it.
Now here's another clip. This one put out
by APAC tracker, same two people.
Well, first of all, there's never been a
ceasefire, and there's never been a ceasefire since
1948.
That's just part of the propaganda line that
the
Western media has been feeding us because you're
being fed that.
So again, this is the doctor speaking to
CNN saying, there what do you mean ceasefire?
There's no ceasefire. They're but they bombed every
single day because they have. It's obvious, and
people on the ground know that.
And these ridiculous so called media platforms
just repeat the I was just at least
they have them on, but my god, they
just pull they just narrative narrative, and then
everyone calls them Hamas supporters. It it's just
it's painful.
Imagine being them and watching this happen, trying
to help people, and then getting called a
racist terrorist for even trying to help children
that are being starved to death.
The
the carnage induced by our last five presidents
are
largely Republican legislature,
and previous legislatures.
And the whitewashing
performed by
the American
and Western European
legacy media
is
directly responsible for 100%
of the 100,000
kids,
that are acknowledged to be dead or which
have yet to be found because they're buried
under the rubble.
And if the media
cannot acknowledge, for example, that 1948,
even happened Mhmm. And educate their viewership about
the sequela of that, then you're not gonna
either investigate or report on the babies that
were buried alive in the mass grave that's
not even a hundred yards from me.
Just try to put yourself in their position.
Think about that.
Having it having to verify, like, you know,
that you're you're watching it. You could literally
send them video. You you you have doctors
around you full I mean, the the amount
of evidence that, you know, even other Israelis,
even IDF members who have admitted these things.
And you still have to debate this. So
do do you condemn Hamas?
Like, stuff like that.
It's it's obscene.
Now, I'll actually play that first
since I mentioned it, and then I wanna
play that other clip again because I think
it's a good point good moment to play
that.
But this this is the one just about
the the,
I thought I saw that on here.
Yeah. Right here.
Do you think that you witnessed
war crimes taking place?
Probably.
The ground assumption is that they are Hamas.
And then if you go this way, you're
bound to kill people that are not.
Now in a rare interview, one soldier tells
us about the reality he says he witnessed.
What kind of stuff would they say? There
are no uninvolved,
only unarmed. This is something that I'm going
to carry for the rest of my life.
Now let's play a couple of these other
doctors just in case those haven't seen him
because they're powerful and important to hear. Now
I wanna reiterate, guys,
that this
is it's the list is incredibly long.
I mean, these are just the ones I
mean, they're I'll show up. I forgot to
play this one too, and then I'll play
the other ones.
Actually, I've I take it back. I've got
a few of them I wanna play.
It's important for you guys to hear these,
though. Just it's not some one off situation.
I mean, I don't I I don't every
doctor that I've heard of that comes back
from Gaza has the same story.
And all we wanna listen to is a
bunch of,
like, radically extreme politicians
who have an obvious agenda one way or
the other.
Doctor Morgan McMonagle
in Nassar Hospital,
Khan Eunice, Palestine.
Sorry. It seems kinda low for some reason.
I won't jump in if you wanna turn
up your volume.
Send us this message on Tuesday,
03/25/2025.
We were up all night last night operating
on those
injured by the latest bombings.
During the night
two children
approximately age five were pronounced dead on arrival.
We had one 10 year old boy who
was hit by a severe blast.
He suffered a head injury abdominal injury
and severe orthopedic and vascular injuries to his
lower limbs.
Another injury was a 12 year old girl
with multiple gunshot wounds
inflicted
by shots fired at her from an Israeli
Apache helicopter.
We worked on her until 3AM.
She will most likely lose both legs
and an arm.
Her parents' status
is unknown.
They were trying to run
from the helicopter.
The Israeli government has killed
200 children in less than a day. It
has killed 18,000
children up to now.
What kind of a world do we live
in where they can get away with this?
When I was in Gaza twice last
year, I saw mostly children.
They would come in either dead or critically
injured. They bomb hospitals
and kill journalists with complete impunity.
These are war crimes.
When these crimes are brought to their attention,
the Israeli government engages in toxic deflection.
The United States government
is directly responsible for these war crimes as
well. Both the United States government and the
Israeli government
engage in blame shifting, denying the truth, and
gaslighting the whole world.
I will not be silent, and I will
not be scared into being silent.
If you have been silent up to now,
please check your moral compass.
War crimes are being committed with our tax
dollars.
How long will you allow this to happen?
How long will you be silent?
Wake up.
Of the few Australians in Gaza at the
moment, what would you like
Australian audiences to know? I would like them
to know that
there are Israeli hostages here, but there are
also
2,000,000
hostages
from Gaza here who have been cut off
from food, water, and electricity, and right now
are being carbon bombed. We need a humanitarian
intervention from our government. We need Anthony Albanese
and Penny Wong to listen to the millions
of people demonstrating in Australia and all around
the world.
We need to get medical equipment in here.
We
can you hear that?
I didn't hear that. That's the bonds going
off right now. It's pretty close by. But
this has been going on relentlessly
all night, and we have had triples in
of patients coming in, and we're expecting a
surge of patients to come in because the
bonds over the last thirty minutes have just
increased.
I I need
Every single part of the hospital has been
destroyed. The whole infrastructure
of the hospital has been destroyed. When When
I spoke to Marwan yesterday, he told me
there were a hundred and seven patients
sitting in the hospital, 60 medical staff.
God only knows what has happened to them.
I think we've seen some of the pictures.
Surgeons I know have been executed,
in the last forty eight hours there.
Bodies have been discovered,
in the last twelve to twenty four hours
with who have been handcuffed
with their arms behind their back,
and so there is no doubt at all
that that multiple health care workers have been
executed there in the last few days. Ex
you believe executed by whom, doctor?
By the Israeli Defense Force.
Why would they seek to execute surgeons and
medical professionals?
Well, they've been doing it since October.
Over four hundred and fifty health care workers
have been killed. Friends of mine that I've
worked with over the years,
many have been abducted as well, and nothing
has been heard of them since. So there
is no doubt in my mind, and I've
I I I I can bear witness from
this from my time at Al Aqsa Hospital
and from talking to people that there's been
direct targeting of the health care
system in
Gaza, direct targeting of hospitals,
and multiple killings of health care workers. Any
death is tragic, but this is not and
I say again, anyone dying in any sense.
So this is not, and please don't be
upset by this expression, collateral
damage. This is
specifically targeted, you're saying, medical professionals
by the IDF to be taken off and
executed is your belief?
Most certainly. That is my belief.
Have you at any time seen anything that
leads you would lead you to believe that
there had been terrorists who were hiding in
the hospital. Without exception, every single one has
responded to say they have never witnessed any
Hamas militants in the hospitals they have worked
in. When were you in Gaza?
End Of April for the first couple weeks,
and then there's sniper bullets. I have children
that were shot twice. What you're saying that
children in Gaza are being shot by snipers?
Definitively.
I have two children that I have photographs
of that were shot so perfectly in their
chest. I couldn't put my stethoscope over their
heart more accurately
and directly on the side of the head
in the same child. No toddler gets shot
twice by mistake by the world's best sniper,
and they're dead center shots.
In fact, more than 20 doctors recently in
Gaza
also told Sunday morning about gunshot wounds to
children.
One American doctor told us he even reviewed
CT scans to confirm what he saw because
he, quote, didn't believe that this many children
could be admitted to a single hospital
with gunshot wounds to the head.
Some shootings
have been captured on video.
So of all the disaster zones you've seen,
how does Gaza compare?
All of the dis disasters I've seen combined
combined, 40 mission trips, thirty years,
ground zero,
earthquakes,
all of that combined
doesn't equal
the level of carnage
that I saw against civilians
in just my first week in Gaza.
And when you say civilians,
is it mostly children?
Almost exclusively children.
I've never seen that before.
Never seen that. I've seen more
incinerated
children than I've ever seen in my entire
life combined. I've seen more shredded children
in just the first week. Shredded? Shredded. What
do you mean? Missing body parts, being crushed
by buildings, the greatest majority,
or bomb explosions,
the next greatest majority. We've taken shrapnel as
big as my thumb out of eight year
olds.
The UN reports that to date, more than
80% of Gaza's population has been displaced
and the majority of its buildings destroyed.
A reality which has taken its own toll
on the well-being of children.
So here is the a thread,
as I showed you, with a lot.
All of them saying something in a similar
vein, and some of them are really hard
to watch. Like, this one in particular, this
guy, this very stoic man just breaks down.
Like, somebody who could never you you start
watching this, you do not expect this person
to start trembling because he's
seen dead children. You know what I mean?
And it just I don't know how we
can ignore this,
but some people are.
Get it out there.
Now on one note that relates to this,
you might have seen a lot of this
is how this tends to work.
More than ever, this is breaking through. So
So all of a sudden, you got these
reports about how Gazans are protesting against Hamas,
which is certainly possible. Like, let's be clear.
Like, anywhere else, not everybody everywhere supports what
they argue is the power structure, especially since
a lot of Gazans are very aware of
Israel's influence. Nonetheless, there's only a few groups
that are there if they wanna push back.
My point is that all of a sudden,
you've got this sort of, like, false presentation.
And as Alan MacLeod show shows,
after years of ignoring major, like, almost entirety
of Palestinian protests, the BBC has finally found
one it wants to report on. Hundreds joined
Gaza's largest anti Hamas protest since the war
began. It's just so grossly dishonest.
And Alan then went further, dug into the
background of BBC's Middle East editor, and guess
what? Surprise surprise,
He's an ex CIA employee and a Mossad
collaborator who keeps a signed letter of praise
from Benjamin Netanyahu on his office wall. But
I'm sure that plays no factor on his
reporting about Israel and Netanyahu's what he's doing.
It's just disgusting. And on that and, again,
on that same note, Dan Cohen was just
highlighting one of these same kind of these
characters out there that is reporting as if
he's like, I'm a Gaza Palestinian, and this
is what I think don't ignore his opinion,
but consider what Dan is saying.
His name is Khalil
Saeed, or Saeed, or Saeed, how do you
pronounce the last name? Says who implies that
Hamas is not a resistance movement. Now here's
the point on that first. Regardless of whether
80% of it is is influenced by Israel
or all of it for that matter, It
yeah. That that's the point about what that
means.
Anything
inside the occupied territory that decided to fight
back against the occupier
with with, you know, against, you know, mil
like we talked about. Occupied force fighting against
the occupier.
Simple. Not random civilians.
Anybody doing that though, fighting against the occupier,
is a legally protected act as armed resistance
under the Fort Geneva Convention. It's international law,
guys.
Simple. So
you can't pretend it's not a resistance movement
even if you think it's entirely controlled by
Israel. That's that's it's simple. It's very clear.
And it says, is an Arab that you
imply Hamas is not a resistance movement, is
an Arab Zionist, that's who this person is,
who appears at events in collaboration with APAC.
Stand with us, funded by Netanyahu's office and
the ADL.
Obvious what side they stand on. And it
says his colleague at the Filos project is
former Bush administration official Dan Seiner. Seiner recently
gave a softball interview to Yoav Gallant,
and the architect of the Gaza genocide declared
Palestinians to be human animals before mass murdering
them. Two of these human animals, they put
it, were his father and younger sister, in
fact, who died as a result of the
siege of Gaza order Gallant orders. Excuse me.
Hamas is not flawless, and the people of
Gaza should be able to criticize and protest
against it as they see fit. But this
person,
this support Palestine supporting Zionist apparently, is a
collaborator of the very forces that are carrying
out the genocide of his people that Hamas
is resisting.
Interesting how this works, guys. This is multilayers.
The point is that we're constantly
because everybody sees it. Whatever the inner working
context, they're committing genocide. The world sees it.
So this is the kind of stuff that's
meant to throw in stick in the spokes
to deep to get you distracted from the
ongoing decimation of children to focus on some
nuance they want you to think about.
They consider it. Don't ignore it. But recognize
regardless of that, the genocide is carrying on.
Now as the overlap to this,
one of the most disconcerting parts of this
as it comes back to The United States
is how even as that's happening and as
everyone seems to see it,
that very group that is primarily committing genocide
is simultaneously
convincing our government to get rid or to
completely disregard our constitutional rights. How in the
world that's even possible is beyond me when
we when we all see what's happening.
And let's not forget again for the hundredth
time,
even illegal aliens
have constitutional rights.
So if it's I mean, I've gone over
this is more more times than I can
count. It's easy to look up, and I'll
just do this again in reference specifically Reno
versus Flores, where
justice
Scalia, Republican,
very clearly ruled the fifth amendment entitles aliens
to due process in deportation. And it makes
the case in the art in the article
in per in particular,
in deportation proceedings.
We're talking about illegal aliens, guys. Let not
even especially green card holders, a Visa holders.
But you know where this conversation goes. This
is for people that haven't seen this already.
The reality is that's being disregarded for obvious
political reasons. I think without but, I mean,
transparently
in Israel's interest
at the expense of American interests.
And then using something that many of you
have been kind of propagandized
to hate, whether you'd agree with it or
not, but propagandized to hate irrationally
anyone here as an immigrant, let alone illegally.
So this is how this works. And now
they're getting you to undermine your own inherent
rights, but this is where it starts.
Right? So that's why I wrote they put
this show out called US government's flagrant attack
on free speech. Maui and Khalil was just
the beginning.
So you can read this if you if
you wanna if you wanna look further into
the reality of your inherent rights and how
that applies specifically to greenhorn holders, legal aliens,
anybody. That's the point that you've go look
further.
The fifth and four fifth fourteenth amendment, it
says any person
Applies to anybody, guys. That's the fact that
it even gets pushed back on by people
claiming to support the constitution is what's so
alarming.
But then, of course, we followed up with
a few shows after that. The March 14
show, the demolition of free speech is underway
as partisan grifters and sycophants
cheer on their own demise.
On the sixteenth, US government continues Israel's illegal
war in Yemen,
and Trump doubles down on free speech attack.
This is the evolution of it. We're going
from Khalil. We start talking about the Venezuelan
gang conversation. This one is JFK distraction, US
War On Yemen, Gaza Genocide continues, and US
government war on American rights.
And this is one of the last ones
we discussed, and this is where it got
especially dark.
Because this is where we start to hear
the possibility of American citizens being sent to
El Salvador because they I mean, even if
you wanna claim they're committing terrorist acts, that
is still a it's still terrifying and unconstitutional.
Crimes do not then remove your rights, guys.
Whether they're terrorist acts, they deemed terror or
not. That's the point is they just call
whatever they want as you're seeing right now,
terrorist acts.
People scratching Tesla cars, vandalism, terrorist acts, even
though, yes, there has been very extreme versions
of but which
with that undeniably
federal crimes.
Bombing a building, bombing a car. Yeah. That
they should go to prison for those things,
but it's not terrorism.
Not and and I mean, even on a
coordinated event, you know, the bottom line is
guys, you're they're turning this into because we
deem it terrorism that we can put an
American wherever we want.
Well, let's realize that that would include due
process. That would include the presentation of evidence.
You know, all of which they've denied all
of these other people who have those rights
as well. This was called Trump could send
Americans to El Salvador,
and Israel commits the largest child massacre in
its history.
Now, I'm not gonna play this here. I'll
play it in a second, but I wanna
include this so it sets the tone in
your mind. In case you haven't heard it,
we'll play it again in a second where
Trump see, for those that try to deny,
which is still happening out there on the
Twitterverse, that this was even what he said
or that he didn't really mean it, you
can listen for yourself. Trump floats sending American
citizens to El Salvadorian prisons.
This is an attack on all
damn it. I don't know how I do
I mean, I as always, I kinda feel
like these things happen after I post them,
but I'm crazy.
This is an attack on all you believe
oh, no. I did I was right. I
was making chills. I thought I wrote that
wrong. This is an attack the reason I
say that, by the way, not that I'm
I I never wanna assume. I could always,
always make a mistake. Is that I read
these like four times over. I read them
over constantly. And then I read it again
after I post it. So when I look
back later and it's like a typo, I'm
like, how in the world? I'm an editor.
I read these things over. Anyway,
I'm not saying I know for sure. I
just we know there's weird stuff happening today.
Anyway, it says, this is an attack on
all you believe you're fighting for under a
thin veneer of, quote, fighting Democrats.
It really is, guys. I mean, it's there
even if everything they're saying is accurate, which
is not,
it is still obviously the wrong thing. You
are going after people who have constitutional rights.
You're not giving them due process, and you're
using that to then very I mean, within
days,
suggest that Americans are next.
I said there are already laws in place
to hold these people accountable.
So to create using some I mean, you
you know where we're going. We'll come back
to this. This is terrifying.
So I wanna use this video just because
I thought it was just insane to me.
This is what we get today.
Now I look. In one way, I'm glad
there's a lot of new people, you know,
new and old, just, you know, putting content
out there. I like that. I think it's
good. The more information well, I mean, you
could argue that I think intentionally so the
field gets kind of watered down on purpose.
But, you know what? I think it the
choice is better than none. Right?
My point, though, is that you get this
kind of response to this stuff, which gets
most of the reach. If it lean if
it taps in to your partisan biases, whether
or not it's even factual.
This is, I mean, this is pretty sad.
And this person shares this saying, are there
any alternative explanations beyond simply assuming they hate
America
in regard to the judge who dared to
well, you'll see while I go. The the
this is the guy we're talking about.
And, obviously, I think he's like, all of
them, everyone in that clip has political motivations.
But what he's doing in regard to the
Venezuelan
deportations are is is accurate, is correct. I'll
show you what I mean.
But it says, what other person that possibility
is gonna consider to make the sense of
the situation? My mind is blank. And she's
based on it off of what this guy
says, which is, I mean,
cartoonishly false
based on what they're claiming, not what the
facts are. That's not even my opinion. You'll
see what I mean.
Straight. A federal judge is blocking Trump's decision
of sending back
gang members to the country
of of their origin. Okay. First sentence, right
out of the gate.
Well, it seems that most of them well,
let's be clear. First point, none of them
have been have had due process. None of
them have evidence produced to prove the claim
they're a gang member. None of them.
Secondarily, it's already been shown that some of
them, if not most of them, are not.
That's according to Venezuela, which, of course, they
could be lying. That's according to their family
members, which, of course, could be lying. That's
according to basically everybody other than Trump administration.
Some of them have been proven to not
be. Secondarily,
to the country of their origin. Now think
about how embarrassing this is or if this
person even cares to be so bombastically wrong.
Let's realize that first of all, these were
mostly Venezuelans
who and none of them went to Venezuela.
Okay? I don't believe any of them are
actually El Salvadorian.
I don't think so. I because the point
is it's so opaque, we don't even know
the full picture. A vast majority
were Venezuelan. I think there was Hondurans.
But to say that they went to the
country of origin just shows you that he
doesn't know what he's talking about. And on
top of that, taking it at face value
that they're all gang members. So so far
with one sentence in, we've completely taken at
face value the government narrative for the government
action. That they got rid of gang members
and sent them back where they belong.
Well, no. All of that seems to be
fake. At the very least, we don't know
the first part of it. The second part
is entirely false.
So so there are gang members who are
here illegally.
Nope. Some of them. Some of them, yes.
Most of them the gang member thing is
up in the air. I can now prove
to you at least one of them. I
think one of I think there was oh,
I'll get into some of the other cases
after this. But the one that's important
was a person who was legally in this
country. He'd already been given asylum. There were
multiple people, which is why I balked for
a second there, who were in the process
of doing that.
So, yeah, just by no. They're all illegal.
Just sweeps it all away. No. That's not
the truth. And on top of that, even
if they were, they still have the right
to due process, which none of them were
given. They're not even supposed to be here.
Yeah. So Trump says, let's get rid of
those guys. Let's send them back to where
they once came. Nope. Again, incorrect. And then
a judge
basically looks to stop that from happening. Yeah.
And see, that sounds so ridiculous when you
frame it that
way. Now the reality is the judge simply
said, don't
turn the plane around because these people deserve
rights. They deserve due process. There deserves to
be evidence presented to prove that they're actually
gang members seeing as how it's seen it's
clear that some of them are not, and
almost all of them did not have any
criminal record. That's been admitted by Trump's administration.
So so, yes, at least being here illegally
is a crime.
But is it a crime enough to send
them to a concentration camp in a despotic
authoritarian country right now run by a Zionist
who literally is putting them to hard labor,
especially since many of them were literally fleeing
from bad bad situations in countries that The
US was destroying? Like, all of this matters,
but none of it actually matters when it
comes down to the core point, which is
that they have rights regardless,
and it was not respected. But you see,
if you leave all of that out and
just go gang members weren't sent back and
the judge wants to stop it, that's crazy.
Yeah. And that's what people watch and then
act like it's the full picture, and that's
how the partisan field works.
An American judge whose job it is is
to
uphold the American
law. Okay. No. No. The constitution, constitution, in
fact, not the law, because there's plenty of
laws that are repugnant to the constitution, which
make them null and void. A judge's job
is to uphold the constitution, which is what
he's doing. Not even to say that's what
he's always done or that he's always doing
his job. But in this case, it is
the reality, guys. I mean, I can even
guarantee there's some political motivation for why he
happens to be doing what I can prove
to you is the right thing.
That doesn't change the fact that it is
in fact the right thing. That's just it's
so incredibly frustrating.
Maybe somebody out there can can help me
with this one just to I'm trying, bud.
Make it make sense. I'm trying. I'm gonna
run through this one more time. Federal judge
in America, American Judge, supposed to be upholding
American laws, is blocking Trump's decision to,
send back the criminals
who have already committed the crime of being
here illegally, but are also committing other heinous
crimes. Nope. See how easy that is to
just conflate all of the statements that Trump
makes without any factual factual background or pretend
to be a journalist that doesn't actually vet
any of the things you're saying out loud,
but doing so with disdain and and outrage
because that makes it sound like you know
what you're talking about?
I mean, realize, guys, there are people that
are criminals
that should have been charged with crimes. But
realize, we already had laws to deal with
all of that.
And on top of that, that the people
that you are claiming are heinous crimes, well,
we could actually know the reality if they
had even cared to present the evidence for
the crimes they supposedly committed.
Imagine being see, in response to imagine being
an American in America who doesn't care about
the upholding of constitutional rights when it suits
your political interests.
Exhibit a.
Yeah. Those guys.
So so Trump is looking to send them
back. The judge is looking to block them.
I mean, this is just so
obnoxious.
You're just repeating the same sentence you said
in the beginning three or four times in
a row with more accentuation
because you're just so, I can't figure it
out. Well, clearly, you can't figure it out.
Clearly, you don't know what you're talking about.
And it's not about being outraged about a
judge politically stopping something that should be happening.
I can give you a hundred examples of
that. This is not that. And that's what's
so disgusting is that the partisanship has been
trained like barking seals to jump at whatever
they're supposed to jump at. It doesn't matter
what you can prove. I am suddenly a
lefty supporting extreme judge because that's the narrative.
Doesn't matter whether he's a lefty extreme judge.
Doesn't matter whether he's actually doing the right
thing. It doesn't matter
Because that's what the case is, because you're
supposed to, because that's what the orders were,
push back on this because that's what we
were told.
And it's funny, I was thinking about this
before we got started.
How often do we point this out?
Just a second ago, I felt like we
were being called out by the left. Right?
Now all of a sudden, it's oscillated around,
and I I'm still in the same position.
And now all of a sudden, it feels
like the right's going, you're now a lefty.
And it's just it's just never stops. It's
like moment to moment, it seems to change
around us.
He's working it out.
I I must be missing something. Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah. You're you're missing something. That's for
sure. Now I don't know who this person
is or where this came from because this
other person is the one that posted it.
But get in front of him. Show show
him. Because I'm like, I don't think it
matters quite frankly. But you guys, this is
what has
saturated
the field.
Just subjective,
assumptive,
not fact based Twitter file stuff.
It's
insane.
Now I recommend you go over the rest
of the stuff to understand the reality. I
mean, I already gave you enough tools to
understand the basic reality. Whatever the narrative is,
these people were not given their rights, their
due process. That alone should outrage any American
that cares about anything the Trump side pretends
to fight for.
On top of that, all the other things
we told you were accurate. There's already a
person who is over there who got a
tattoo when he was a kid. His mom
says he's not part of anything, and, of
course, they could be lying. Well, sure. We
get to find out if they ever gave
him due process,
but he was here legally.
Now if you just kick that aside and
go, well, most of them are criminals, then
you're clearly part of the problem.
You still don't know that. You see? But
you're choosing to assume into the side that
makes it feel a little bit less. If
one of them was not here illegally, maybe
more of them were. We didn't get to
find out because they never gave them due
process.
The fact is we can prove that one
of them had asylum and they took them
anyway because he happened to have a tattoo
that looks somewhat like what they were looking
for. Now I'm gonna show you some more
examples right now that show you beyond a
shadow of a doubt this is happening. That
people are being grabbed with no due process,
no warrants presented, and and this is look.
I don't wanna make this about Trump's America
because that's not the reality, guys.
This is not about left and right. But
the point is that in this current administration,
because this seems to be the time to
escalate, this is what's happening. But it's simply
your US government is putting you in a
position they need you to be in for
some kind of an agenda.
USA Today. Venezuelan woman deported under aliens enemies
act were returned.
I found this interesting for a couple reasons
because it seems like there's just no real
guidance here. No. Like, so basically, women weren't
even supposed to be sent. Did they know
that? Did they care? Did they hope they
take them anyway? But there's not the point
that I found interesting is that Bukele put
said specifically that women weren't allowed, but secondarily,
that we wouldn't take anybody from South American
countries because that would cause an issue for
us. So clearly, they're aware that they're doing
something wrong. They're just gonna do it wrong
in the ways they can get away with.
Sounds like a typical Zionist to me. Now
it says lawyers for Venezuelans fighting their removal.
Oh, yeah. Let me go here.
Lawyers for lawyers for Venezuelans fighting their removal
said Monday
that women were returned to The United States
after El Salvador refused to accept them. That
would seem to this is what's funny, by
the way.
Like, I keep showing the false binaries within
the larger false binary.
This to me is the what they're debating.
They're the the left and the right are
all debating whether or not the where Trump
not listening to the judge, well, for sending
the plane back was all we should care
about.
That's what they're that's the main point they're
making as well. Since they sent the women
back, it seems that maybe Trump was lying
about whether they could send them back. Probably.
It's such an inconsequential point to the bigger
point the bigger bigger discussion, but that's how
they get you distracted. So now you're debating
whether Trump lied instead of the fact that
they're destroying this country and removing people's rights
or ignoring them.
But it says that would seem to contradict
the justice department's claims in court that they
couldn't turn the plane around. I mean, are
we debating that? Are we that silly? Of
course, they could have effing turned the plane
around. They didn't want to, guys. And they
just go, well, it's too late.
Like, they can't go, hey, guys. Turn around.
Like, that it's of course, they can. Why
are we even debating that? And that's the
thing we're gonna get into more in a
second. That's what they keep doing. Acting like,
oh, sorry. It's too late. It already happened.
Because they know they're gonna get away with
it right now.
But so that's what they've seen focused on
instead of the reality
that
people were being turned back that were sent
or people were sent that weren't supposed to
be. Like or how about none of them
were given due process? Why isn't that what
all of them are focusing on?
Some of them are, but it says the
governance position
expressed today in DC circuit should send chills
down every American spine. Said one of these
act one of these, human rights or the
I think it was the oh, yeah. Democracy
forward. Somebody speaking up for constitutional rights saying,
when asked directly, the government again maintained
that people the president chooses
to remove from the country
should be afforded no due process. Now Now
this is what I keep pointing out. Trump,
when put directly to the question, said that's
what the law says. But yet Tom Homan
over here, on the same day, made the
argument, no. No. They were given due process
within the laws we currently have.
Same answer,
dishonesty on both sides. One, or rather you
could argue ignorance on one side that Trump
seems to believe he can do that even
though that's
fundamentally false.
On Homan's side, it seems that he's trying
to be a little more sneaky and argue
with whatever we put in place. That is
what we call due process or whatever.
The bottom line is Trump has reiterated once
again that that's what he's allowed to do.
I can just get rid of who I
want with no due that's not true. I
don't care what narrative you scream into the
air. National security does not change the fact
that you have rights that shall not be
infringed.
These are all escalations in the direction of
being able to remove or ignore what they
want when they give you the excuse that
you're supposed to take.
You know, it says this is a threat
to all Americans
and a king like expansion of power.
The problem is that people that wanna believe
he's doing it for the right reasons and
somehow magically will give it all back when
the right things happen
don't care or pretend it's not happening. And
that's scary.
Lawyers for Venezuelans submitted two sworn statements Monday
from a Nicaraguan
woman
and a Venezuelan woman, who
said El Salvador refused to accept them. The
woman said that they had and seven other
Venezuelan women were flown back Saturday night. See,
these
the guy claiming the video that they were
all sent to their court, country of origin,
it's just it's flatly not true. Now it
says the 26 year old Nicaraguan woman whose
name was blacked out in court records said
the Salvadorians
refused
to accept any woman or anyone from another
Central American country.
Now it says, quote, I overheard a Salvadorian
official tell an ICE officer that the Salvadorian
government would not detain someone from another Central
American country because of the conflict it would
cause. I also heard him say that there
would not they would not receive any females
because the prison was not for females, and
females were not mentioned in the agreement.
So just think about that. So they didn't
even bring it up, but you said they
just throw them on they throw them on
at the last second?
I mean, what it what it speaks to
to me is just flying by the seat
of the pants. We already have countless examples
of no warrants being presented, no real process.
They're just scooping up people that are in
the right place, the wrong place, the wrong
time with the right tattoo,
with the right skin color.
At least in some cases, that is the
truth, guys. We've seen it.
So what what seems like here is they
just kinda tacked on so women didn't realize
it was wrong or didn't care, hope they
would go anyway. I mean, they're none of
them are given their rights,
or they're not acknowledging their god given inherent
rights.
But the interesting point is Bukele saying that,
well, we don't wanna take them from this
area because that's gonna cause conflict for us.
So you just can clearly see that this
is wrong. What's happening is wrong in every
way you look at it.
Now independent rights, the chilling effect on free
speech. Trump wants green card applicants
who are already legally in The United States
to hand over social media profiles. It's the
same conversation, guys. And you know the same
people who would scream about the how important
the constitution is are the ones now going,
well, they could be terrorists.
You're falling for the trap. I don't I
I have to believe that's not the majority
of people who understand the constitution
because that just means that
dishonesty rules the day. The problem is, as
we just showed you, yes, green cards holders,
visa holders, and even illegal aliens have the
right to the same constitutional protections,
which means that you don't have to just
hand over your information, whatever it is, because
the government demands it. Now the difference would
be in the process for filing for a
green card, yes, they ask for this information.
And now I would argue at least as
even as much as I don't think that's
what should be happening, that that's the process
that you have to go through to be
given the green card, and you can choose
to or not. So it's still your choice,
right, to not come into the country.
Whether or not you think that's okay, that's
what it is, and it's logical. So but
the point is now that there are people
here, they've already gone through that process. They're
saying, now, even though we already gone through
a vetting process, we're demanding you hand over
whatever we ask for when you ask for
it. That's what this is.
The Trump administration's proposal to vet social media
profiles of green card applicants, again, who already
went through this process years ago, last week,
whenever it happened,
already legally in The United States has been
condemned in initial public feedback as an attack
on free speech. It is.
Whether a green card holder or not, whether
it's porting Palestine or Israel or whatever, they're
here legally,
and they have a right to their personal
privacy, guys. That's and and any number of
overlapping amendments.
Search and seizure. I mean, we talk about
the fourth and the fifteenth. That's the obvious
overlap to this main port of deportation in
in immigrants, but nonetheless,
all of it applies.
USCIS said the vetting of social media accounts
is necessary for the enhancement, identity verification,
vetting, and national security screening. You see, they're
trying to conflate
the process of applying for it with randomly
this this is like the equivalent of stop
and frisk.
The agency also said it's necessary to comply
with Trump's executive order titled
protecting The United States from foreign terrorists and
other national security and public safety threats.
And see, there's some of the guys that
anyone they think could be might be a
terrorist all the time. Don't forget, Trump also
floated this top and frisk,
like, recently before he came into office about
the immigration problem.
That is one of the most unconstitutional things
we've ever seen rolled out in a daily
process.
But they just go, you, right there. Stop.
I'm gonna pat you down. It's insanely unconstitutional,
and it happened anyway, though. And he promoted
it again, which just shows you where this
is going. It's not hard to see.
It says, so The US is heading for
authoritarian now? He said, this is a violation
of the first amendment. Just somebody speaking about
this. Showing effect on free speech. It says
the fear of government scrutiny of online expression
will undoubtedly stifle free speech.
Even just like as we pointed out, even
just the fear. So somebody's gonna go, well,
now that they're gonna demand my social media
profile, I'm not gonna speak out about why
Palestinians deserve free speech or why they shouldn't
be murdered.
Because we know that's what they're going after
right now. It says, this is particularly concerning
for individuals with from countries with different political
climates who may fear the misrepresentation
of online activity because that's what's happening or
misinterpretation.
Right now, they're calling people to save free
Palestine Terrorists. It's not hard to see how
ridiculous it is.
That's at the highest levels of power, guys.
It says civil rights groups have raised concerns
that the policy proposal would disproportionately
impact critics of Israel. Everybody sees what's happening.
And the US government handling of the conflict.
In other words in other words, saying committing
genocide and calling that out.
It says the new proposal comes as the
IRS is close to an agreement with ICE
to allow officials to use confidential
tax data
to confirm names and addresses of people they
suspect
are in the country illegally.
See, just because you say in the country
illegally, a huge portion of conservatives
suddenly forget the constitution.
Even though as I keep pointing out repeatedly,
they still have the constitutional rights that the
rest of us have. But the point is
suspect.
How long have we talked about this? Precrime,
medical precrime. They're building the idea that we
can float the and and let's just even
say that they mean it. Like, we genuinely
suspect that. It's still a violation of your
rights. But how about we understand,
as always,
that they'll abuse that to get what they
want in the moment.
Whether it's a welfare check or, you know,
stop resisting. You know, these things they use
when they know it's not be it's about
creating the context. So they can claim they
suspect anything whenever they want to. And how
are you gonna prove that they didn't suspect
that? You know, you can talk about reasonable
reasonable doubt and, you know, and and the
whatever. There's a lot of different a lot
of different things that could be pushed, but
it's all subjective in the moment.
And all they're opening the door for is
the fact that they can literally now access.
And and also one of the points of
the background aspect, AI and everything of the
consolidation
of the data sources, but they can simply
claim you might be something and use that
to dive through everything you ever said, everything
you ever know. That is where this all
goes. You can see all these things intersecting
right now. Now Now it says ICE could
submit names of suspected
illegal immigrants to the IRS
or, by the way, suspected whatever they wanna
claim. Right? It's not just about illegal immigrants.
That's what they're using to get you ignoring
it.
To and, again, I I can't
the redundancy needs to be there. I know
people get frustrated that we the point is
about continuing to understand the overlap, which is
that
ultimately, the illegal alien in this context, there's
already laws that could be used to go
after them. What they're doing is building and
adding new law. Again, at the same time,
when they're claiming to be reducing government, it's
funny how everything they do seems to be
building out the government.
But to cross reference on confidential taxpayer databases
according to insiders,
The agree and look. I'm sure they add
some AI bot to help with that process
using your personal information. No no concern for
privacy. The agreement has alarmed career IRS officials
who fear it risks abusing a privacy law
intended to build criminal cases,
quote, not enforce criminal penalties.
Fabian Schmidt, a 34 year old German electrical
engineer,
was just deported. We'll talk about that next.
There's a bunch of examples we'll go over.
Actually, first, I forgot to open this one.
Sal Yagra shared this. Orange County couple deported
to Columbia
after thirty five years in The United States.
Now a couple of these examples are not
necessarily about right or wrong. It's it's just
wanted to show you
really kinda pose the question.
What is this really about?
What like, in regard to the issue, is
it about the fact that you're worried that
there's terrorists seeking the country? Is it about
the fact that you think that the immigration
is draining the system? You know, it seems
that everybody's got a different opinion and the
response to it dramatically changes based on what
you think the issue is. Even though it
seems the government's coming at it in one
very clear blunt direction that's interested in benefits
their agenda.
My point, though, is that if we have
people like this and, you know, people that
are at highly educated, doctors in some cases
like these people who have children, adult children,
have been here for thirty five years,
but there's some kind of a troop up
in the system that that is, you know,
claiming they like, I'll go through the information.
You'll see what I mean. That they end
up getting deported
because of some, you know, little because they're
that whatever it is, the new system is
saying they shouldn't be here anymore. Okay.
There are people right now
I mean, I guess the overact I guess
the point I'm trying to get at is
if these are the kind of people that
we're pushing out of the country, people that
are adding to the like, the idea of
what we pretend this country is doesn't exist
anymore. Is it about the American dream? Both
sides pretend that even though it's that hasn't
been the case for a long time.
Is it about bringing in the people that
can better the country like Elon and Trump
keep pointing to? Well, then these doctors would
be the case.
So So I think there's I think what
we're dealing with here is something obviously more
nefarious. And I think it comes back to
personal political opinions,
other countries' agendas.
But I just want you guys to stand
back and ask. It's like, is we everyone
envisioning this in the right seem to be
thinking of Palestine supporters and evil foreign students
and domestic terrorists when that doesn't seem to
be remotely what's actually happening.
This person says, this shouldn't happen. Why didn't
they do the paperwork?
He says, they did. Did you read the
article? This is difficult. Here's the article.
It says the American dream ended abruptly last
month for Gladys and Nelson Gonzales,
a Laguna,
Nag how do you say that? Nagil?
I will I'll just say Laguna for the
location. Couple deported to Columbia after thirty five
years of building their life in Southern California.
The pair who raised three US born daughters
were detained during what should have been a
routine check-in with immigration officials on February 21
according to Fox. Their oldest daughter, 33 years
old, by the way, Jessica, described the confusion
that day. And they're all they're all born
in this country. The mother
called at her mother called after initially receiving
an extension
to you know, so they're allowed to be
here. They were given an extension to stay
in the country,
only to be arrested moments later when a
different agent intervened.
So is this the Democrat, Republican's perspective? Right?
I mean, like, it it doesn't make any
sense right now. It says this official was
cruel, they said. One of their three daughters
said this. They arrested my dad first and
then called my mom in to arrest her
too.
It says they were put in handcuffs by
their wrists and ankles, which seems a little
bit extreme, and treated as criminals before getting
to these detention centers. Now is that because
they're now framing this as everyone's an MS
thirteen gang member terrorist? I mean, you know,
however, if that seems to be the presentation,
why would you take people that have been
here for thirty three years who have who
have, you know, education, jobs, family, and chain
them by arms and wrist and legs like
there's some kind of you know, I think
it's about the impression they're trying to give
or that they've been trained to see it
this way.
But it says all they said is they
extended their stay even though every year
they've had permission to be here. The point
is their their excuse for taking them was
they extended their stay, but they were allowed
to.
And says and they're law abiding citizens who
show up
and are doing their duty to check-in with
immigration and say, hey. I'm here. I'm not
hiding or doing anything wrong. So every time
they were called, they go into their meeting.
They check-in. They say and which I hate
the idea of any free human being having
to go in and check base with the
government. But the point is they do so.
They come in. They say, we're here. We're
not doing anything wrong. We've got jobs. We've
got families. So what is it that we're
trying to get rid of in this country?
Why would this kind of group be the
ones that get kicked away when you have
examples of a hell of a lot more
that's problematic?
It says, for decades, the Gonzales had dif
diligently
followed immigration protocols. Nelson worked as a phlebotomist,
which I I forgot. I was gonna look
that up actually what exactly that was. Surgery
he does he does the surgical opening or
puncture in a vein in order to withdraw
blood and introduce a fluid. So I guess
maybe people that draw blood. I thought it
was a different name for that. Maybe the
person that puts in I don't know. Point
is a doctor.
Right? Or rather somebody with a specialized field.
Gladys maintained their household.
Their daughters insist their parents were never missed
they never missed appointments and continually pursued legal
pathways to remain in the country.
They call that they call home since 1989
when they fled Colombia, again, seeking asylum from
violence and drugs. By the way, Colombia, a
group that US government has always supported despite
the leading narco trafficker in the world of
cocaine.
Well, they'll happily call out Maduro for narco
trafficking while working with Columbia because totally not
hypocrites, though. But it says the US Immigration
and Customs Enforcement spokesman and ICE spokesman provided
a different perspective,
simply telling the Orange County Registrar that the
couple had, quote, exhausted all legal options to
remain in The US between March 2000 and
02/2021
despite numerous appeals through various immigration channels. Okay.
So what is it that's pushing them out
of the country? This is what I'm not
understanding.
Are they a drain on resources even though
they're put that he he's in a specialized
field and their children have jobs and you
know, I don't understand what the logic would
be. Now look. If you just wanna say
that they that they weren't given the right
to be here after they've been here this
long, why wouldn't they just go here? You're
allowed to be here. Here's extension of your
your your process. Are we is it is
it that you wanna force them into getting
citizenship, which I would, in some way, would
understand,
but that's not being addressed.
I guess the larger point I'm simply making
is that as we go into some other
cases, this seems like
people being swept up in some political agenda
even though
they they seem to meet every metric of
what even Trump and then Elon Musk say
are the kind of people that we want
in this country.
Now since the Gonzales family story reflects the
broader shift in immigration enforcement priorities
now that that that now target anyone living
in the country without authorization
rather than focusing primarily on those with criminal
records. But here, even they had authorization.
But that's a good that's a good point
to think about. Right? As we can see
all these people going to El Salvador without
criminal records.
Shouldn't it be the people that are at
I mean, I think that's the game is
that's trying to give you the impression that
that's all there is.
But these apparently, they're now back in Colombia.
They they have family there. It's not this
is it's just not one of the worst
stories, but it is interesting to me that
this is what we're focusing on. And that
does seem to be a lot of what
I'm seeing.
Here's another example, a German national, which kind
of an interesting overlap as well is it's
like all these Republicans seem think they're focusing
on a bunch of Palestinian brown supporters, but
it doesn't seem to be a lot of
what's happening. German national arrested at Boston Airport
and his family have no clue why he's
being held by ICE. This is from March
17.
The family of a German national who has
been in The US on a green card
for seventeen years and was arrested at Boston
Logan International Airport has no idea why he's
being detained by ICE.
Fabian Schmidt joins a growing number of Visa
and green card holders in The US who
have found themselves swept up in the Trump
administration's aggressive immigration crackdowns.
The 34 year old electrical engineer, so, again,
somebody who has a specialized field or at
least something that's not just average, you know,
work at McDonald's, has held a green card
since 02/2008 and renewed it last year.
That should matter, guys. According to his mother,
so he's who, who lives also in this
country on a green card.
He was arrested at Boston Logan International Airport
on March 7 after returning from a short
vacation visiting family in Germany, which as we
get into one in a second of one
that a a girl has family in Lebanon
and and why they detained her,
I think this is somewhat related. My personal
opinion.
So he goes to Germany and comes back,
and that's when this happens. It says senior,
oh, he's, is it senior
Yeah. I think the last person's name is
senior claimed he was interrogated
before being taken to Rhode Island's Watt Detention
Center in Central Falls.
She has not been her she, the the
mother has not heard from her son since
March 11.
Now even that is
just wrong.
Like, the idea that you just disappear these
people with no due process, with no ability
to recontact anybody. Like, even if you agree
with all that, that's not what we've always
pretended this country is.
Some of us have been aware it kinda
hasn't ever been. But realizing that we at
least pretend, we tell ourselves that we are
the better. Right? We're the one showing the
world the way. Well, in that case, then
this person's clearly not a criminal
in the case of what you're claiming in
the larger sense. Like, you could say but
but even then, he's not even here illegally.
He has a green card.
So what is the point of treating him
like a terrorist and not allowing him and
shipping him off to some dark zone where
he's not allowed to contact his family?
I think there's I think there's something else
driving this, but at the very least, from
a US perspective, it's about showing you what
will happen if you challenge the power,
even though he's not.
Now Schmidt faced a misdemeanor charge a decade
ago,
but has no active legal issues.
US Customs and Border Protection assist assistant commissioner,
Hilton Beckham,
sent a statement.
If statutes or visa terms are violated,
travelers may be subject to attention and removal.
Well, yes. But
with due process,
where you say, here's how they violated the
terms. Here's the evidence that shows they did
that,
and that's why we're doing it.
That is what the point is, and that's
not happening. They're claiming we can just say,
you you're here because we allow you. Now
you can go. Well, that's the same way
they're playing with their constitutional rights, acting like
they can give and take away when they
want to. Same point.
Just recognize if you can think about that
for yourself and know the government can't just
be like, right now, then you don't have
free speech because I say so. Well, the
same thing applies to him or anybody else
in this country.
If you think they broke these rules, then
you could prove it then. Right? It's easy.
Show the evidence. Kick them out. But that's
not what they're doing, and you think you
know why.
The family claims that Schmidt was forced to
strip naked
before being placed in a cold shower and
shoved back into a chair, according to reports.
His family said agents pressured him to give
up his green card. Doesn't this all sound
very familiar? We just talked about the forcing
to be claimed to Moss. Right?
He was also held without food or water
and taken to the hospital after collapsing from
the flu, his mother claimed. Of course, custom
border patrol says that's not true. Now who
knows?
Maybe they're lying. Maybe he's lying. Maybe they're
making an update. Who knows? But it is
a little bit eerie, especially since we know
that they are breaking the law, that they
are ignoring your constitutional rights and everybody else
it seems, and how weirdly aligned it is
with what we keep seeing happen everywhere else.
Anywhere else they're involved, whether Syria, Lebanon, Gaza,
Libya. And it's weirdly seems to kinda be
the same thing we see from their groups.
This woman we'll talk about next. She's another
one that's been deported.
But it says the case comes as Ivy
League doctor Rasha,
Alawi
was deported to Lebanon. That's what we'll talk
about next. Despite a court order that she
stay in The United States
until a court could determine the more details
of her case.
She's a Brown medicine doctor from Brown University
specializing in kidneys.
Must and she the thing that she must
stay in, must stay in Lebanon. Oh, now
now she's forced to stay in Lebanon
while a federal judge
goes back and forth with the Trump administration
as they ignore what's happening,
as they intentionally defied a court order to
halt for deportation. This is not this stuff
this is a different story, guys. So many
of these are happening right now that people
aren't even reporting on it.
The the interesting thing here
is this Lebanon.
You know, where Israel was literally murdering people.
So for you, they think the the age
old claim of, you know, you can't send
them back to a war zone, for example.
An interesting point. But it says, Allah, Allahweh,
Allahweh,
was also detained at Boston Logan International Airport.
So could just be coincidence, the same place,
but maybe there's more of a focal point
on certain locations.
And this is after returning from a family
trip,
a trip
visiting family in Lebanon. Now you I'm sure
you know where this is going. This is
her story.
Independent independent as well. Deported Ivy League doctor
will remain in Lebanon as judge hears arguments
over Trump ignoring court order. Now, again, they
seem to only seem to be hyper focused
on the whether they can't ignore the order
or not, which is important, but my god,
the ignore the the ignoring of in
of human and constitutional rights seems a bit
more important to me. But what I do
think it's interesting, it's the same excuse.
And you'll see how very clear it is.
They just pretended like they didn't know, rushed
her out of the country, and they go,
oh, too late. We already did it. There
was an accident. They know what they're doing,
guys. They you'll you'll see it in this
case right here. And I'm willing to bet
you they delete the evidence because otherwise, you'll
be able to prove they knew and did
it anyway.
Here's the story. District Judge Leo Sorokin no.
Oh, by the way, take note of all
these different judge names. Interestingly, you're only hearing
a few of them focused on. Do you
know why? Because not all of them are
left leaning Democrat judges.
Isn't that interesting? And don't you wonder why
they won't point that out? You all know
the truth.
What's interesting though is they only wanna keep
focusing on the ones they can make a
case about. So then you then the broad
audience of the partisan field just continues to
assume. That's how that works. They keep saying
that so you watch and you go, yeah.
They're all Democrat radicals.
Not even true. Not all of them are
even Democrat. And definitely not all of them
are radical.
You'd look at their back their rulings. They
seem to be going different directions. But I
argue all of them have political leanings, and
it's obvious. But this case, well, I didn't
even look into this one. District Judge Leo
Sorokin
ordered officials with with,
custom and border protection
to court in Boston Monday
to explain why the Ivy League doctor was
deported,
Apparently, in defiance of the court order that
said, don't send her away. We need to
find out what the what the case is
here because it's quite obvious what's going on.
And you I I don't wanna jump the
gun. You'll see it. They they're I think
this is for
the whatever whether it's for Israel or because
of the agenda that both The US and
Israel involved in,
the people like this are being targeted.
Meanwhile, allowing actual criminals to stay in this
country while getting rid of Ivy League doctors
because they support Palestine.
Now it says the government lawyers argue that,
border agents had not received notice
of last Friday's order
until she had already left.
It's ridiculous, guys. Not only that, it goes
further where the person literally went in the
office, was ringing the emergency bell, and saying,
guys, there's an order. They they ignored her.
Nobody came to the front of the office.
The government will have until March 24, apparently,
to address allegations, and attorneys for the deported
Alloway, I just remember I mispronounced her name,
have until March 31 to respond to the
government's motion to dismiss the case. Meanwhile, she's
in Lebanon.
Now it says c p says
border patrol officers searched her phone,
which by the way, I think is always
a violation of your rights, and would not
immediately admit her to The US according to
court documents.
It says in court documents defending her removal,
government lawyers claimed she attended the funeral
of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah
while she was in Lebanon and supported him,
quote, from a religious perspective. So you see
where this is now, guys?
So the bottom line is and but just
to make that clear, this is when she
was trying to come back into The United
States. Right? So as she's coming back after
of coming from Lebanon,
and, oh, honestly, I I can't suss out
whether she actually went or not. It wouldn't
surprise me. She probably did. But she went
to see your family in Lebanon.
She cared to come back. They would search
her phone, and for a moment, didn't really
let her back in. But then then let
her back in The United States, and then
swo swooped her up
because of from a religious perspective, they claimed
she supported
the Nasralla. I mean, that's that's as as
insane as saying that you are gonna arrest
somebody in The UK because they believe in
Donald Trump.
I mean, guys, it's it's insane what they're
doing today. That's why whoever they don't like
is suddenly a terrorist. But most essentially, suddenly,
that's how this government's operated for decades.
But she simply goes to a funeral with
that's even what happened.
Comes back to this country, didn't break any
laws, not a single one. And she has
now been targeted for removal because Israel has
a problem with that. How do we not
notice that?
Or at the very least, through Israel's direction,
The United States has labeled anybody supporting anybody
in against their agenda as terrorists, therefore, she
has to go. Who cares if she's a
specialized doctor who helps this country? Who cares
if she hasn't broken any laws? Who cares
if she's here legally?
It says they also claim to have discovered
sympathetic photos and videos. Well, guess what? We
don't get to see anything because there's no
due process.
You have to realize, guys, this is somebody
here in the country legally who has a
specialized field as a doctor. And they just
swooped her up and sent her to Lebanon
with no process.
No crimes. No evidence presented.
Now, he I mean, we're past the point
of illegal aliens now. We're talking about a
a person in the country legally that they
just decide to remove.
And it's not hard to see how quickly
this becomes you.
This is officers, quote, determined that her true
intentions,
go ahead and try to suss out how
they did that, in The United States
could not be determined.
Well, yeah. Let's be real. You can't determine
anybody's true intentions. That'd be your assumption unless
they literally wrote out, here are my intentions.
They're simply trying to say because they can't
decide what her intentions are that she has
to be removed.
Again, if you're an honest person, this is
insane. This is so far out above. If
you understand and truly believe in inherent constitutional
rights, this should be you should be falling
out of your chair. This is such a
incredible overreach.
It's everything again, if it was Obama or
Clinton, these people would be marching through the
streets with torches.
It says at 07:18PM,
Sorokin ordered the judge ordered
that Alloway, quote, shall shall not be moved
outside the district Of Massachusetts
without providing the court forty eight hours advance
notice of the move and the reason therefore.
07:18PM.
Now it says she that basically in the
court filing made went public Monday, LOA's attorney,
Claire Sanders, said she was not able to
reach the border patrol agents. Here's why.
She in the building, by the way, well
before she was left because
jumping ahead, she actually left the at four
seven forty three. So 07:18,
the ruling. This woman makes it to the
building well before they left and says, quote,
I yelled loudly and repeatedly through the office,
trying to get an officer's attention
in case the officer or one of his
colleagues were simply at the back
in a position not visible from the front
portion of the office. Nobody was there.
She goes she said, I received no response.
During the twenty minutes that I was waiting
at the office, she said she called the
number listed on the handwritten sign approximately
eight more times.
So you we're gonna pretend like they just
perfectly were no no no one answered the
phone. Nobody was in the front of the
office. In the perfect gap between that ruling
and when she was there with the ruling
and when they let let her fly away
in a rapid time frame,
this was a deliberate choice clearly because that
person was identified.
That's my opinion. Same with we have Batar
US identifying Khalil. There and one more example
coming up where Israeli groups are going, that
person, and this this US government says, how
high. Right? They jump they fell to jump.
They say, how high? Which way? What to
do? You respond.
This is them deliberately
making themselves scarce so they don't have to
address the issue. But here's the point. They
were text. They were called to went through.
They had the information.
That's where this goes.
It says, Allaway, who specialized in kidney medicine,
was reportedly on a valid h one b
visa. Isn't that interesting? You know, the same
one that Elon used to stack up his
own team, but not but this doesn't apply
because she
went to Lebanon,
did something that wasn't illegal.
You claim she has support for something that,
by the way, also wouldn't be illegal because
that would be ideological freedom and free speech,
none of those things are terrorists?
I mean, we're not even talking we're talking
I mean, it's just insane. I mean, there's
so many ways to look at this. Whether
you can argue Lebanon in general or Hezbollah
specifically, they are not terrorist organizations. It's just
it's one of the most obviously proven things
in the conversation. They're just deciding to make
it that way because they're their adversary. As
you're watching the people they're fighting commit genocide
in in in Gaza, in Syria, in Lebanon,
but they're not the bad guys.
But it says that that she acquired from
the American consulate in Lebanon.
So the US government gave her a visa
because she was an expert.
According to Thomas s Brown, a lawyer who
works on immigration and visa applications and cases
for doctors attached to Brown Medicine.
Brown University is Ivy League. The doctor has
studied and worked in The US for six
years. She has been working at Rhode Island
Hospital for the last year, caring for kidney
transplant patients. The transplant division's medical director, doctor
George Bayless, toward the told the Boston Globe.
Now it says, quote, in addition, the government
shall preserve this is what the the judge
is saying. So basically saying the allo the
allegations are supported by a detailed
just going quickly. They're saying, look. We you
know you we know you got the information.
Right? This is a problem. So in addition
to what else we're saying, the government shall
preserve all of the documents bearing doctor Alloway's
arrival and removal
since the issuance of the visa described in
the petition, including emails and text messages.
How much you wanna bet that magically disappears
or whoopsie, we didn't know we had to
keep it. That's how this seems to be
going because you'll be able to prove that
they got the information and chose to ignore
it to get her out of the country.
Why is this who we're even focusing on
back to that first point?
An Ivy League doctor, a specialist who had
no criminal record?
I think it's important we ask that. It
seems to be weirdly tailored around things that
are inconvenient for Israel.
And as always, they have rights,
none of which were afforded.
Milwaukee mother deported to Laos, shaken, as she
faces decades without family in The United States.
Now, Yang, here's her picture right here, was
and this is an interesting one. This one,
there appears to be a crime that was
committed around cannabis, which you know my thoughts
on. But I find it interesting to give
you the kind of full breadth of what's
happening. None of this seems to be really
focused on what they keep screaming at you,
which is telling. Yang was born in a
refugee camp in Thailand, but gained legal status
as a permanent US resident until she pleaded
guilty to cannabis related charges,
which by the way is just insane to
me that we're still even playing that game.
But it says, and served thirty months in
a federal prison. Thirty months for cannabis. Well,
genocide. No big deal or whatever. It doesn't
always have to be that point. There's plenty
of things that our government are doing right
now that no one cares about while putting
people in jail for thirty months for a
plant.
That's one of the most harmless things on
the planet. But it says, having taken a
plea deal mistakenly believing that her green card
would be not be at risk, she is
now one of the millions and millions of
people Donald Trump pledged to kick out of
the country, I mean, during his campaign. But
is this what we thought? Is this is
this the reality? People who are, you know,
part of society but made a you know,
chose to smoke cannabis the wrong time and
get removed?
I mean, isn't that what he keeps telling
you? A bunch of rapists and terrorists and
because he's tapping into your extreme nature.
I just think it's interesting. Now but the
point of this one is that she did
commit a crime,
but went through the process,
kind of be giving the impression that it
wouldn't include her green card, and then they
just took that too.
Now here is one of the last ones,
or I think I have a couple more.
This is Tufts international student,
Rameza
Ozturk,
detained by the feds. This one, I believe,
was today.
Now here, I'll play this first, actually. Now
this is a clip
that was caught of of this person being
rounded up.
Now, again, this is a as it says,
a Turkish doc doctor she's she's in a
a doctoral student. She's going she's seeking her
doctorate.
A candidate at Tufts University in custody tonight.
Or excuse me, yesterday, last night. Friends and
supporters suspect
that Osterk is the first Boston area college
student detained by federal agents over simply,
then this is even what they're talking about.
Pro
Palestinian activism.
Now take note of how when they recognize
people are filming that all of a sudden
these federal agents all pull up their masks.
So it's funny how they love to make
that case about COVID nineteen, but these are
all Republican on the Republican administration. No one's
gonna call them out for that. The point
though is they're clearly hiding their identity. Now
what you're gonna notice in a lot of
these, especially the one we come to next,
is that they are not, in most cases,
giving warrants that I can see, not really
identifying themselves
because they they feel like they're acting on
some, like, extrajudicial, you know, above the law
situation.
Okay. Oh, they'll pull up the masks.
Okay.
You guys covering your faces?
You wanna take those masks off?
Yep.
Is this a kidnapping?
I got if if you listen closely, which
is probably hard to hear for the podcast,
but it it makes me sick how she's
going. What's happened? What's going on? And they're
like, don't you're fine. You're fine. You're you're
calm down.
Yeah. Calm down. We're just we're just violently
arresting or rather just, you know, ignoring your
constitutional rights. Just relax. Stop resisting.
You know, it's it's it's like when people
ask questions like, what's happening? They're like, no.
Don't stop. You know, don't speak out. Stop
resisting. Just calm down.
I mean, there's no reason that you should
have to be calm or you know, you're
not acting violently, but, like, this is insane.
What are you what you're doing is a
violation. What you're doing is, you know, you're
the gestapo at this point. I just think
it's funny how they're always like, just relax.
Everything's fine.
Yeah. You don't look like it. Why are
you hiding your faces?
Why are you hiding your faces?
Gosh. So many see some faces here. How
do I know this is the police?
And why is she handcuffed even? Seems like
bullshit to me.
Certainly looks like it.
And you have to realize, like, there may
the other person was handcuffed legs and feet.
Like, what's the point of that? Are they
charged with a violent crime?
I mean, realistically, this person's being arrested for
you know, to to find information. Right? That's
not what they that's how they play, but
it's obvious that this is being done.
Right? And as Kimmy pointed out in the
chat, five agents
for a a a small,
doctorate student.
Talk about cutting the waist.
Bit of a kidnapping going on here.
Look at that look at that jerk agent
just doesn't wanna get out of the road.
The people the people are it's just you
know, I recommend high impact flicks. If you
wanna watch some just outrageous things the cops
do on everyday basis or how little they
seem to understand about your constitutional rights while
screaming about your rights,
I mean, you get you get the gist
of it.
So
as Ryan Grim points out,
or first, Aaron Mate simply says, for all
the legitimate complaints that MAGA had about Dems
cracking down on free speech
it's this one.
For all the legitimate complaints that MAGA had
about Dems cracking down on free speech, nothing
compares to what the Trump administration is doing
to put Israel First. I agree.
That's the point about this. It's disgusting. It's
like it's like it's like the same thing
with COVID and Trump from before.
It's they're rolling out what is in earnest
what what the Dems were doing too, rather
just your government was doing all sides, but
they do it in earnest to the person
you think is supposed to be fighting it
so you don't see it.
And here's what Ryan Grim said. For more
than two hundred years, generations of Americans fought
to make this a free country.
Never perfect, but always aspiring to it. MAGA,
and I I argue more so the TeamSport
Republicans. There's a lot of people that believe
in that, that are not bad people, that
think they just are being manipulated or are
currently calling it out.
But he says MAGA ripping up that legacy
to defend Israel against criticism or protest while
it is starving a civilian population.
Now continuing, it says, her attorney, who is
his name is
Khan Babi. I'll
point out why I said that later. Ozturk,
who is observing Ramadan, was on her way
to meet up with friends to break her
fast.
Typical.
The detention comes days after a pro Israel
group
called the Canary Mission
reportedly doxxed
Ozturk
for anti Israel activism.
So this is what gets insane to me.
Another person who is here legally,
somebody who is a doctor,
or rather going to going to be a
doctor, going to school,
who
spoke out in something she believes in. So
if I told you she was arrested and
deported because she spoke out about what Russia
was doing, would that be outrageous to you?
If I told you she was deported to
another country because she spoke out about what
The US was doing, anywhere in the world,
would that be out yes. No. People would
be like, no way.
But for some reason, when you point out
that she had spoke out about even if
it was like, I hate Israel more than
anything, why is that suddenly something we think
is acceptable?
At least some people. I really feel it's
a rapidly diminishing number because it's impossible to
hold that stance if you're in any way
intellectually integra if consistent or have integrity.
The bottom line is this is what you
have.
This is what's protected.
You can be anti whatever you want. You
can say, I believe or I don't believe
in anything you want. That's free speech. It's
ideological freedom.
Even the point about the other one saying
religious belief that's still religious freedom. Right? But
not when it applies to things Israel don't
like.
I've never seen a more rapid succession of
examples of how this government, all of it,
is fighting for anything Israel doesn't want or
lie. Either way you look at it, wants
to stop or wants to support.
To extreme levels that are destroying
in front of our eyes everything we believe
this country stands for.
And you got all these screaming red Republican
talking heads at the TeamSport politics side, Jones
and all the rest who are blindly going
along with this.
So
an Israeli group says that person spoke out
against Israel, and they
sweep her up, deport her,
or at least in the process of. Now
since reports have pointed to an op ed
in the Tufts Daily in which Ozturk and
other students call on the university to get
this, guys. Here's her terrorist activity. Quote, acknowledge
the Palestinian genocide
and divest from companies tied to Israel. Here,
interestingly, exactly what they historically told you to
do instead of terrorism. Go to the political
avenue. Right? And then you do, and they
call that terrorism too.
How dare you call for them to divest?
You know, like the successful mo movement during
apartheid South Africa did that we all support
and praise today. Right? But when you do
it against Israel, bad guy.
Terrorist. Because Trump and Israel Netanyahu said.
That's what that's all they have, guys.
But they say that's terrorism because you're supporting
a terrorist group. That's as simple as that.
Now her lawyer says she doesn't know her
whereabouts
or even how to reach her.
Welcome to 2025 America, guys.
You just get scooped up on the street
by a bunch of nameless, faceless people with
no warrant,
dragged away somewhere. God knows where. Probably in
El Salvador for all we know. Why? Because
she spoke out against Israel. Really supported Palestine.
She doesn't know of any criminal charges being
filed, and they don't they don't need to.
They didn't do it with Khalil. They don't
care. And recognize
both of them are here legally,
and they're
point blank telling you it's an ideological thing.
There's no room in that conversation, guys. That's
not supposed to be the way this country
works.
She filed a petition in federal court Tuesday
night to ensure that Auster won't be removed
from Massachusetts,
which a federal judge approved.
But we don't know where she is, so
maybe she already left. And what are you
gonna get? Well, too late. It was already
done. We didn't see the order like they're
doing every other time.
The Trump administration is increasingly targeting student protesters
for their political views on Gaza.
The most high profile examples, of course, have
been Khalil and Chung, we'll talk about next.
A federal judge Tuesday granted a temporary restraining
order barring federal immigration officials from detaining Chung,
who we'll show you next, a legal permanent
resident. Like, she you know how quickly this
train change from illegal immigrants to people who
are here legally and just have the wrong
ideas?
Chung has been here since he was seven
years old.
Judge blocks attention of Columbia student targeted by
ICE.
A federal judge issued an order Tuesday barring
federal immigration officials from detaining
a Columbia student whom the Trump administration has
targeted
simply for protesting palace for Palestine.
You that's Yoon Seo Chung's case is the
latest example of the Trump administration's
efforts to detain and deport people who are
legally in The United States,
including some who have been targeted for their
political views and activities.
Seems like the majority of almost all. I
I don't even see an examples of, I
mean, in this in the context of here
legally. I haven't seen any of them that
they claim have actually committed crimes. Any of
them.
Yanceo no longer has has to fear that
ICE will spirit her away to a distant
prison simply because she spoke of her Palestinian
rights, says her lawyer. Well, assuming that's what
happened though, I guess we'll have to find
out whether they, whoopsie, missed the order and
sent them somewhere else.
Chung is a legal permanent resident in The
United States who has lived here since she
was seven years old. A Department of Homeland
Security spokesperson told Axios in a statement that
Chung had, quote, this is what they claimed,
engaged in concerning conduct,
including when she was arrested by NYPD during
a pro Hamas protest
at Burrard College.
She was be she is being sought for
removal proceedings under the immigration laws. Oh, did
she get charged with the crime? No. No.
They just arrested her alongside of a lot
of other people protesting for Palestine.
And that's enough for them Because all they
do is call it pro Hamas, and, well,
Hamas is a terrorist organization, and we pretend
Israel didn't fund them, and so it's all
done.
No. No. It's still even if all that
was true, they still get due process. You
see what they don't care, guys, because these
people are not working for American interests. In
fact, they're quite literally working against them.
And this is actually terrifying.
This, by the way, is what I believe
is probably happening more often than not.
Every case we've shown you is basically exactly
like this. My point is I'm willing to
bet you it's happening more than we could
possibly imagine right now in cases where we
just not get just don't see it. This
clip is coming from my media off of
Blue Sky,
and it's a clip showing you what's happening.
People not not not identifying themselves, not presenting
warrants, breaking in a car window to drag
people out of the car without every, even
truly identifying themselves.
Who even know? I'll I'll let the videos
be, break it down for you.
Oh my god. Oh my god. Pregnancy
is not doing it. And she's pregnant, by
the way.
ICE agents swarmed a vehicle on Monday in
Spokane Valley, breaking its windows and forcibly arresting
two people.
Kayla, who was seven months pregnant, repeatedly asked
agents to show a warrant, but they refused.
Her husband was in the process of obtaining
a green card.
ICE said there were active charges for their
arrests, though their attorney says there is no
warrant in the system.
ICE said the men were linked to a
Venezuelan gang but provided no evidence, and Kayla
has denied this.
The executive And you know how we could
find out? Yeah. Same old story. Right? Due
process. Director of Latinos in Spokane said escalating
ICE raids reflect Trump's broader push for mass
deportations, which leaves Spokane's immigrant community vulnerable due
to its proximity to the Canadian and Idaho
borders.
On the door. No. No. You can't.
You can't.
Why?
It's illegal. It's illegal.
See, the problem is that
same old story. Right? Is that people act
like
what he's you know, that you
you they're using our right no. You the
point is they all have the same rights
you do.
Doesn't matter. Even if he was breaking the
law, the rights still apply, guys. You still
have the process for a reason
because it gets abused.
And all you're doing if you pretend that's
not a problem is allowing them to open
that door even wider. And tomorrow, it'll be
your family.
So as the Hill reports, the Trump administration
invokes, as you might have expected was coming,
state secrets privilege in deportation flight cases. So
going back to all of those cases where
they're going, give us the evidence. Did you
know? What happened? Where are they? Well, they're
going, guess what, guys? National security.
And another reason why they declared the enemy
the Alien Enemies Act because they needed to
just hide behind
national security.
The Trump administration invoked the state's secret privilege
late Monday in its court battle over its
use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport
Venezuelan migrants, again refusing to provide more detail
about the flights to a judge. The point
is it's not about who I don't care
about whether he could've turned it around. Obviously,
he could've. The point is about what actually
happened. What's the charge? What's the evidence? How
can you prove which is what the judge
was actually asking. How can you prove
what is the evidence to prove that they
are actually gang members? Because they do have
due process.
And now, they're going national security.
See, that's what an that's what an
unaccountable authoritarian government looks like.
There's no balance there. There's no check. It's
just we do what we want. You can't
push it.
And then when the judges try to highlight
that, they try to get them impeached. And
here's Elon Musk paying people a hundred dollars
to sign petitions to get them impeached.
It's disgustingly dishonest.
Whether or not they're politically motivated, which I
know they are, the the invocation
deems details about the flights as a state
secret,
seeking to limit information to district judge James
Spoosberg, specifically,
who has vowed to, quote, get to the
bottom of whether the Trump administration violated his
order to turn him around.
It's just it's it's it's what you would
expect. Even if you're on their side, even
if you agree with them, what this is
is an abuse of power.
If you're right, then prove it. Just show
the evidence.
This is not what you do when you're
right or have the evidence on your side.
The point is people just support it because
they choose to.
Now here is as Max Blumenthal says, Elon
made little Marco say this.
You we showed you it recently.
Kill the boar is a chant that incites
violence, he says. South Africa's Leaders and politicians
must take action to protect Afrikaner and other
disfavored minorities.
The United States is proud to offer those
individuals
who qualify for admission to our nation amid
their continued horrible threat of violence. Oh, great.
So you don't care about people getting sent
back to violent areas who are doctors because
they just, you know, have the wrong color.
But these people can be brought in even
though the assimilate
the whole point, these are very different people
in the context of where they come from.
They're Dutch migrants in South Africa. It's not
whether they're white or not, it is the
exact problem they claim they care about. But
it doesn't matter because clearly what they matter
what they care about is not what they
claim. Okay?
At the same time, they are literally pushing
people out of the country who are either
becoming doctors at Brown University or literal doctors
at the moment or specialized fields because there's
a little bit of a compliance issue. I
don't even mean legally. Like, they just decided
to renew it or whatever. Meanwhile, they're going,
come on. All these people come in, who
are part, in some cases, of pretty radical
extreme groups.
You I think you already know why, guys.
This is not about what they claim.
This is for somebody else's interest. And Max
simply points out, meanwhile, in Israel, the country
that controls Rubio's career, there's an annual event
dedicated to chanting death to Arabs, which is
also the policy it's currently implementing in Gaza.
It's very easy to prove. And I simply
I what was it? The,
oh, wait. Did I I thought I grabbed
oh, that was I grabbed this article. So
in this, you can see them chanting that.
It's a very common
thing. So if you care about one, you
care about all of it. Right? But that's
not how this works. There's logical inconsistency.
Just in case you forgot, as as Robert
wrote, Israeli settlers consistently use arson attacks to
burn Palestinians alive. The image you're looking at
is a child.
His name is Ali. Here's Times of Israel.
Jewish Extremists taunt Ali's on the grill,
at the slain at the toddler's family.
Right? So, basically, they burn the family's house
down, burn the child alive, and then when
people as the family walks by them, they
chant, Ollie's on the grill, and they're dancing
around. And then here's a video of them
doing that, along with Ben Gavir, by the
way,
chanting,
always on the grill with a little effigy
of the little child and stabbing him and
burning him. These are this is literal. Look
at the child. It's right there.
They're smiling and dancing. It doesn't matter what
you believe, what political side you have. These
are monsters.
Anybody that's gonna celebrate the death of an
infant baby because he's the wrong color, the
wrong
this is who peep this is who's leading
the country right now. I don't mean Trump
in particular. I just mean the ideology, the
pollock, the power structure that is driving action
is this right here.
That doesn't even have to be just Israel,
guys. I'm just simply saying that if we
can't recognize the kind of unbridled hatred and
racism that's stemming through these people's actions,
then you don't wanna see it. It's everywhere
you look right now. It's on the surface.
They're murdering people in Palestine,
openly telling you why people don't wanna ignore
it.
Now to end in general,
the biggest problem for me
is how clearly this has already evolved into,
well, maybe Americans are next,
as we talked about.
Trump admins,
oh, this was the oh, wait. This is
the wrong one, actually.
It was this one right here. Even though
they're all in here already. The point was
that this is about
Trump suggesting that they could be sending Americans
to El Salvador.
So here's that clip I told you earlier.
You probably all seen it already, but this
is Donald Trump openly saying that. This was
not a joke. He doesn't smile or bark
or tweet. It immediately says they're terrorists.
So if you can't see already how how
a
I mean, I don't even it's it's a
it's a hair.
Like, a nonexistent
divider right now between deciding to make an
Americans who go next.
There if if if they don't care about
the legal challenges right now, then why would
they care about the other? It's the same
point.
I I mean, obviously, to those that care,
they're it's all wrong. An American would be
a huge escalation, but it's already basically happening
if you understand this is the rights, the
law. It's the same difference.
And here he is telling
you, at the very least threatening that it
could be the case if you choose to
push back. And I just wanna thank him.
He's going through a lot,
what they're doing to him.
And these people are gonna be caught, and
they they're gonna be caught, and they're gonna
be prosecuted.
And from what they tell me, I see
this just by watching your programs
and reading the news. But from what they
tell me, they could get twenty years in
jail, and they'll get it. I'll tell you.
There's gonna be no leniency, and there'll be
no pardons. I can tell you that. Right?
And you said this morning twenty years in
jail and then maybe they you said this
morning twenty years in jail and then maybe
they'll go to one of these prisons in
El Salvador. Do you think with the way
that the judges have been issuing injunctions,
it would be easier or harder to send
these Tesla domestic terrorists
to a jail in El Salvador than these
MS thirteen or Trende Arago guys? Well, I
view these people as terrorists just like,
others.
When I looked at those showrooms burning
and those cars, not one or two, like,
seven, eight, 10 burning, exploding all over the
place.
These are terrorists.
Sure. Okay. Fine. Let's just pretend that's the
case.
So it's pretty easy to argue that if
you go beyond seven, eight, 10 Tesla cars,
you know, I don't know, maybe kill 80,000
children or, you know, 50,000 be would that
then be terrorist too? Like, how obviously. Right?
So you've set the bar, Trump. If terrorism
is Tesla's burning in a showroom and no
one dies, then it's clearly when somebody dies,
then that would be terrorism. Right? Funny how
the logical the inconsistencies
come all over the place on top of
the obvious.
What he's talking about is one example. And
there's been a few of them that have
gone to the level of federal crime. Nobody
should deny that. Nobody should say it's okay.
Nobody should support people burning people's property down.
It's insanely stupid to pretend anybody honest would
support that.
That is the political partisan game they want
you to fall into,
justifying the thing that you shouldn't because of
your side. That's what they want from
you. The problem is obvious, guys. And what's
happening here is that that's an example of
an extreme part. 90% of the rest of
a bunch of random Karens keying Nazi signs
into a Tesla car. That's it. That's and
that's what he's calling terrorism.
Yes. He points to the bigger example, but
you can see the Joneses of the world,
the Sorters, and all the rest of them,
and the instruction bar, we all regularly calling
it domestic terrorism when they highlight somebody getting
caught on a camera scratching a car.
This is terrifying
because it's real, and it's happening in front
of you. And people have already been removed
for reasons that are insignificant in the context
of what's going on in the world, if
not completely insignificant because they simply were in
the wrong place at the wrong time and
have the wrong idea.
Here's Dan Bongino.
Today is March 25, and if you're considering
an act of domestic terrorism, then we will
hunt you down and find you. Because that
was necessary. Right? Because because all the domestic
terrorists are checking in with Dan Bongino. Go,
oh, don't do it today. He's looking.
It's just so stupid. It's all theater. It's
all to go, we're coming after the big
bad guys as they ignore all the real
big bad guys and go after people that
happen to have the wrong skin color or,
you know, said the wrong thing about Israel.
Who they Dan, they've all told you. Number
one in your heart, Israel. Israel's support of
Israel. That's what he said on the record.
Well, the FBI
says the FBI has been investigating the increase
in violent activity towards Tesla.
That's what they're talking about.
Not everything else.
Not child trafficking, not Epstein files, not murdering
of innocent people in multiple countries by all
of your allies. No. No. No. Whether Tesla's
might be targeted,
you know, in whatever level of violence it
is. It all tear it's all terrorism because
Elon Musk.
Insane. But that's what he talks about. We'll
find you.
Well, just to include in case you missed
it, you know, and just like that, Republicans
are now supporting electric vehicles, but just the
right ones,
they are laughing at you.
Now interestingly, you have this overlap where Fox
News is saying, Dems who railed against domestic
terrorism,
silent as Trump floats twenty year sentences for
Tesla vandals.
Like, I'm not sure if they think they
know like, they're trying to make the idea
that Democrats are somehow soft on domestic terrorism
when it matters even though it's like they
undermine their own point. Right? Like, it's insane.
Because you read the article for yourself. That's
what they're doing.
The idea is this isn't domestic terrorism. And
I that whether all of you absolute,
you know,
pretenders in congress and all of our two
party illusion decide to care more the bottom
line is you're trying to use the two
party illusion to make people who wouldn't have
supported it pretend like this is terrorism and
that they're
shying from calling it that.
As always, not whether it should be done,
but how.
Always how this works.
But here's Alex Jones bombshell.
President Trump believes he knows which global scum
globalist scum.
You mean the Israeli government?
Do you mean the great reset dynamic that
Elon Musk and Trump are rolling out? No.
No. Not those global scum. Okay. Sorry. The
global scum who are behind funding radical left
Democrat terrorists torching, shooting, and bombing Teslas across
the nation. Yeah. You mean that one example?
Or you mean the all the rest of
them that are teethed keying the paint off
a car?
It's just insane. It's childish. It's naive.
The point though,
Trump thinks he knows what might have happened.
Breaking.
Great factual reporting. But the overarching point, guys,
is this is about directing your outrage
towards this small story instead of everything else
going on. Or how about everything else that
they promised that isn't happening?
Nobody should deny that the the people are
breaking the law, then hold them accountable.
It's not really news breaking story, guys. If
they key a car, put them in give
it vandalism charge. If they bomb a car,
put them in jail.
Done. Simple. For you guys to build this
out into something ridiculous, give me evidence. Otherwise,
stop talking about it. If you have evidence
of some democrat plot, democrat plot of you're
manufacturing it, that that will be relevant because
it's coordinated.
Still not terrorism,
but present your evidence or shut up about
it. Because all I keep hearing is a
bunch of floated narratives and hyperbolic statements about
our democrats and well, guess what? Just like
Soros' dynamic, you have Elon doing the same
damn thing or whoever else in a million
other examples of oligarchs funding everything.
Every group from every moment they want, they
support them, they give them signs. It's everywhere
you look. It is your government. It is
the two party illusion of which Alex and
the rest are a part.
But as we already showed you what matters
in the conversation about how they're brought overshadowing
everything else, here's what I think is what
it's really about, at least in some case.
Here's Alex Jones, you know, the not his
account, but the one that's, like, profiteering for
underneath everything he does. Says, are you shopping
at the real Alex Jones store?
You're not gonna wanna miss the Cybertruck giveaway.
Oh, weird. It's almost like there's something more
to the whole story.
Order a Doge t shirt and chainsaw t
shirt and Orlan Trogga. Yeah. Seems like they're
profiting wildly off the whole thing.
Well, here's another one. Same post, by the
way. There's, like, seven of these down here.
Tip of the spear bundle. Order the tip
of the spear bundle from Alice Jones and
enter to win a new Jeep Rubicon.
My god. You know, you get the sense
why this is why I hate this stuff.
Not just because grifters like this do it
all the time, but this is why you
rarely even on my show itself, half the
time I don't promote even donating. It just
it grosses me out, and this is the
most ridiculous case of it. Now this is
a different post showing you the same thing.
Same post under the same post multiple times.
Tip of the spear bundle. This was a
tip of the steer tactical blade from Jones
store
or your pills and stuff.
Get your air get your yeah. I need
get your what does it say? Keep Alice
Jones on the air while getting awesome products.
Well, somebody speaks up and says, what the
hell is wrong with you? No January 6
arrests?
No Epstein?
No COVID arrests?
Right? Or how about the supposed FBI agent
that stopped the release of the Epstein files
or shorted you on the JFK files? You
keep telling us all these claims. Why wouldn't
they be arrested if that's what happened? Because
they probably didn't happen, guys.
COVID is still on the schedule. It is.
They're still giving COVID shots, guys, under the
current administration.
And now the crap CDC nominee?
Yep. We just talked about
that. I says, fine. Arrest the vandals. Frank?
Arrest the people doing the car vandalizing cars
or bombing them. Put them in jail.
But something done. Get something done. It says,
Bondi is worse than Sessions and Barr combined.
These are conservatives, guys. Look for yourself.
I'm not just making these things up. You
can look. If you're reading this along, it's
just it's my interpretation. I could be there
could be more than one. I I could
be wrong about the bigger picture, but it's
obvious that a huge portion of conservatives are
just not buying it. People that follow him
and like half of what he does, they're
going, but that's dumb. You're wrong. It's obvious
that most people
aren't stupid,
aren't
that easy to play,
but enough are. And that's where they make
it all.
To finish, in general, this is,
Benny Johnson, of course, sharing. Pam Bondi scorches
Jasmine Crockett for the threats towards Elon Musk.
God. It's like by the way, you right
now, you're gonna see this ridiculous story.
It's it wasn't worth the time to play,
but where this same person walks by some
Loomer reporter in congress and puts her hand
on the camera.
Like, like, the most it's like that woman
that pretends she was stabbed in the eye
with the flag when all the there's a
flag brushed by her face, also a Zionist.
It's typical, right? Well, guess what? Laura Loomer's
claiming that my guy was attacked and we're
suing you for for,
assault.
Look it up for yourself, guys. The video
itself makes it very obvious she put her
hand on the camera, walked by.
This is what they are. Not only do
they constantly try to make themselves the story
because they're I think they're just needing attention.
It is dishonest.
It is about trying to gain you're you're
distracting.
You're it's not news. It's propaganda.
Now in this case and let's be clear.
Like I said last time, I think they
put people like this Crockett out there to
make this look ridiculous.
Instead of actually like, when it was in
the case about whether the,
it's it's like talking about this and violating
constitutional rights. And instead of that, you focus
on the airplane back and forth. You take
the partisan point and you make that the
story.
I think they're all doing that. So you
put somebody like this crocodile who seems ridiculous
to me and seems to be making it
all partisan points.
So that's the case you look at. Either
way,
notice what they're doing here.
Threats towards Musk? Well, you can listen for
yourself. The point is she's saying that it's
it's like saying that Donald Trump speaking before
January 6, which is the point they make
in this,
and then people went out and did things
makes it Donald Trump's fault. Well, if you're
gonna have logical consistency here, didn't we all
argue that, well, he could he said things
that's their responsibility for action?
Same kind of way. He didn't say go
do violence neither did she.
It says words have consequences, Bondi says. And
what happened after she said that about Elon
Musk in her own home state? Three explosive
devices were found.
Well, even that I mean, I'm very suspicious
about how all this keeps happening right now.
The whole swatting and Elon targeting and a
lot of it seems to be very hollow
in fact.
But either way,
are you to pretend now that because she
said something about Elon Musk doing things he
shouldn't be, that suddenly bombs planted are her
fault? I don't care if she went up
and said,
Elon Musk is a terrorist. Well, isn't that
what they're doing, by the way, against everybody
they don't like? The point would be that
people are responsible for their actions.
This is using people, like I said, somebody
who's a cartoon,
on the left and the right, by the
way,
because you hate her. They know they've trained
you to hate these people. So when they
make the case that is, you know, not
really following your constitutional law,
you ignore it. Or in this case, the
point would be that
making words violence.
You're the you're the left now. You are
the left. You're the Democrats.
The idea is that people can say things
and that's their right. Whether it's bombastic or
not, I will always stand by that. Even
fire in a theater, I will hold that
line. I believe that. I think it's always
people's responsibility for their own actions. How that's
even something they have to argue is crazy.
But what they're doing is now saying words
have consequences. Well, guess what, guys? Words literally
don't have consequences. Or if we believe the
if the constitution, they shouldn't.
But they're telling you they do now. And
because you said the wrong thing, people did
bad things. Therefore, you are responsible. How do
you not see how that comes back to
you?
It's just so lazy to me how obvious
this stuff is today.
And finally, house speaker Johnson says, we do
have authority over federal courts.
Yeah. It's we've lost the plot today, guys.
This has been we've it's it's clear that
they're they're building this case in order to
rationalize the complete destruction. I mean, look. Republicans
primarily have been saying for a really long
time, they're coming for our guns. They wanna
remove our free speech rights. And a lot
of us have been like, yes. I've been
watching the incremental change, and it's not just
Republicans or rather just Democrats.
And now we're at a point where it's
the most obvious example I've ever seen of
these things coming to fruition,
and the people who should be calling them
out are pulling their punches
in some context.
And that's terrifying. I mean, we have to
see how rapidly this is happening. Now is
the moment, guys. All this time, we're waiting
for these action. Now it's rolling out in
front of you.
I mean, we shouldn't be waiting for an
American to be thrown in El Salvador for
this to actually mean something. It's already there.
If you believe in these things, if you
bill if you're fighting for inherent constitutional rights,
the moment was weeks ago, months ago, years
ago if you're paying attention.
Stand up and find the courage to fight
for what you believe in. Not what they
tell you you believe in but what you
know you believe in.
Thank you for tuning in tonight, guys. I
appreciate your support.
I just it's it's kind of a pinnacle
moment right now.
There's something happening now, and it's not the
it's not just about Israel. It's not even
just about you know, it's not about one
thing or the other.
You can feel I think if you're just
truly standing back and looking from a nonpartisan
lens, that there's something different happening right now.
It's it's not just the rhetoric.
It's the it's kind of the l the
elevation of the pitch. It's it's gotten to
a point to where it feels more real
than ever.
I mean, it's kind of abstract, but I
I know we all sense something like that
right now. And
if we just kinda let it flow, which
is kinda what I think they expect,
I believe we're gonna wake up at a
point where we can't come back from. And
I'm not trying to be hyperbolic.
I certainly hope I'm wrong,
but I think we all recognize that there's
a bunch I mean, they're kinda telling you
that. Whether it's the, you know, efficiency changes
for x, y, and z or AI to
meet this goal. We're watching some pretty rapid
changes happening right now. And I think that
it's almost like they expect people to just
let them see it out. I mean, let's
end on that point. What do we keep
hearing from the partisan side?
Let's just give them a shot. Let's see
how it pans out. Let's just see let's
give them some let's give them a couple
years to see what they get done.
Well, maybe that's exactly the point.
Hopefully, they'll just pacify us until too late.
At the very least, I hope you can
ask that question.
Thank you for tuning in, guys. I appreciate
you all. I love you all. As always,
question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.