Feeding the news, but from what they tell
me, they could get twenty years in jail,
and they'll get it. I'll tell you, there's
gonna be no leniency. There'll be no pardons.
I can tell you that right. And you
said this morning twenty years in jail, and
then maybe they get you said this morning
twenty years in jail, and then maybe they'll
go to to one of these prisons in
El Salvador. Do you think with the way
that the judges have been issuing injunctions, it
would be easier or harder to send these
Tesla domestic terrorists to a jail in El
Salvador than these MS 13 or trendy arrival
guys. Well, I view these people as terrorists
just like,
others. These are when I looked at those,
showrooms burning
and those cars, not one or two, like,
seven, eight, 10 burning, exploding all over the
place.
These are terrorists. You didn't have that on
January 6, I can tell you. You didn't
have anything like that on January 6, which
is sort of amazing because on January 6,
the the,
Democrats were talking.
Nobody was killed other than a
very beautiful young woman, Ashley.
It would be easier or harder to send
these Tesla domestic terrorists
to a jail in El Salvador than these
MS thirteen or Trende Arago guys. Well, I
view these people as terrorists just like, others.
He's a when I looked at those, showrooms
burning
and those cars, not one or two, like,
seven, eight, 10 burning, exploding all over the
place.
Sana,
capital of Yemen.
This is what CENTCOM
does best.
Only civilian
buildings in a residential
neighborhood.
Yes, Anna. Yeah.
Much, much worse. This is our residential neighborhood.
It's about
two and a half kilometers from
the center of the exit in Saudi.
Welcome to the the daily wrap up, a
concise show dedicated to bringing you the most
relevant independent news as we see it from
the last twenty four hours.
Monday, March twenty fourth twenty twenty five. Thank
you for joining me today. A a lot
to get to today.
Basically, one general thing I want you thinking
about as we go over it. I kinda
gave you a little insight there,
not just about the the kind of
the partisan conversation around this Tesla, the the,
you know, ongoing Tesla topic,
but more so about what I think is
underlying that from a nonpartisan perspective as usual.
But to consider how that may tie into
larger conversations
in kind of comparison to what real terrorism
looks like ongoing around the world, we'll touch
on that toward the end. But one of
the main central things to keep in mind
today,
just from a non part like like, the
point that I referenced from James Corbett's recent
interview with, the I'm blanking on the podcast.
I'd love to give him a shout out
right now. It's what is,
something podcast. Damn it. I'll put him in
the showroom if I can. But, anyway, in
that recent interview of him saying that these
are building blocks. Right? From administration to administration,
left and right, they basically hand off the
baton. They build, and they continue to build
on what they're handed from it. And even
though there's a lot of wedge issues and
narratives and, you know, apparent you know, at
least what they
want you to think is division
amongst them or, you know, difference of opinion.
And the real the reality is you can
see these ongoing agendas from from administration to
administration. So today,
look through that thinking of that kind of
connection from how these things have continued to
build, And you're gonna see a lot of
narrative, a lot of flashy you know, when
you but when you dig into it, you'll
immediately recognize that this is not even remotely
what they're claiming. All I want you to
ask is what that might mean. Don't take
my word for it. Just think about it.
What would be the logic of why they
would lie about what they're doing and and
doing something else? And then when you see
that that something else seems to be perfectly
in line with multiple agendas across multiple administrations,
then, you know, at least consider whether that
is a continuous narrative or rather agenda
that never really stops, and and the narrative
continues to fluctuate based on what they think
you'll buy. Always something to consider. I'll leave
it there. Make sure you, you know
I mean, I just to start out in
general, I wanna make sure if if you
guys find something you think is important in
this conversation, I I always say this at
the end of the show, but if you're
watching now,
take time to break off what you like.
I know these are long shows. I know
that minimizes our reach. It I think it
just is what it is today. And I
try to do small things here and there,
interviews, and but but I find it impossible
not to include things that I think are
important. So if you like a part of
the conversation, make a note of it, clip
it out, talk talk with your groups about
it, make sure you tag me. I'll share
it myself, give you some give your group
a boost. The point is just to to
help get the information out there, just critical
thinking, nonpartisan objective conversation.
Now I wanna start with but what we're
gonna do today is basically talk about some
developments of things that are, you know, not
necessarily failed promises, but just the ongoing
partisan, you know, all government manipulation
and all then both narratives
and the real direction.
And one of the things we're seeing now
is this kind of spending conversation. And I
told you I'd I'd continue to follow-up on
this. It's I find it incredibly fast, and
I can I can sit on that USA
spending website for the a very long time
and looking at these different, you know, projects
and different things they're funding? I'm gonna go
over main top four main topics to start
in regard to spending that you might find
surprising.
Specifically searching for circumcision, you might find interesting
seeing as how they can't stop referencing this
Mozambique Circumcision point, which is crazy that that's
even being spent.
Anything is from this government or your money
is being spent on that, but you might
be surprised or might not be surprised to
find out that they're still doing that. Different
funding, different contract for the same outcome. We'll
also talk about COVID nineteen spending that's continuing,
mRNA spending that's continuing. Weirdly enough, as I
keep showing you, more contracts for climate change
spending from this administration. And you may think
that doesn't make any sense until you stand
back and look at it from a nonpartisan
continuation of the same agenda. And I'll explain
why they might even still be using those
terminology
or the those terms that terminology
in regard to, you know, what knowing that
we're gonna look there. It's the same point
they make about USAID and why the woke
ideology was being used as a vehicle for
regime change. It's the thing at the time.
Now it's shifting away from something else. But,
historically, it's whatever they can do to get
the foot in the door. And, yes, there
are people that believe in those things, but
we're gonna go through why this spending is
continuing, why that's important, and and and and
make sure we touch on how that rolls
into the larger kind of globalist agenda that
is still continuing, and then how this Tesla
conversation seems to fit into it all. And
the main point on that one focal point
is that the Tesla cars are absolutely
clearly spying on you like a lot of
them are. And this weird shift to all
of a sudden, Republicans are super all about
EV electric vehicles, but only the right ones.
Pun intended. Of course, we'll go into the
digital ID overlap to that and some overlapping
foreign policy that I think is very important.
But we'll start today
with one point that I didn't I, you
know, I can include this in a lot
of different places today. This one, I just
wanted to point this out because in this
I think we've mentioned this already, in fact.
That's weird. I did not do straighten this.
Hold on. Just for for those in the
podcast, if there's any space on the side
of the window for me, it drives me
crazy because that's how crazy I am. There
we go. Had to fix that. Alright. So
this is important because and I believe we've
touched on it, but if we haven't, it's
not really about I mean, there are interesting
points in here for this executive order from
Donald Trump, which is on the screen from
March 14 about the different executive orders that
Biden had put out that he just made
null and void. There it there's it's there's
interesting points to look into, especially since, you
know, this says ensuring a data driven response
to COVID nineteen. Well, you may think, see,
he stopped it because he's against it. Well,
when I go through the many different contracts
basically funding the same things, you might ask
why that makes sense.
But more than all of the different things,
you know, some good, some bad. The point
is,
I rescinded 78 presidential orders and memoranda issued
by president Biden.
So just recognize this is the larger point
that Catherine Austin Fitts, I think, was one
of the earliest people to make the point.
That if you do this the wrong way,
even in the of things you actually want,
it will guarantee that there will that at
some point, it'll be changed. So if you
can recognize right now that he can simply,
on the one stroke of a pen, say,
78 different executive orders from Biden that changed
all sorts of things are no longer valid,
What do you think is gonna happen the
next time somebody else who disagrees what he's
doing takes power?
So for all those out there acting like
we're gonna change the world with all these
this is only a momentary measure. And in
most cases, executive orders don't technically legally apply
to anything
other well, in all cases, other than the
executive branch,
which is actually a pretty big web. But
at the end of the day, you already
have examples of things that are not actually
in the wheelhouse of what these would apply
to, and yet it's they're doing it anyway.
It's just a a lot of what's happening
right now is lawless, and it's not just
the right of this conversation. It is your
US government. How long have we been talking
about rampant lawlessness well before even Trump's first
administration? Because that's the reality.
So just think about how silly it is
to act like this is changing when we
know it's as simple as that. I think
it's designed that way. I think it's meant
to give you the illusion of change when
really the goal is to cement the same
thing even harder.
Now to get into some spending points, I
just wanna make this very clear. I wanna
do this early in the show because this
is just a really quick rapid succession of
just straight up blatant hypocrisy.
I've there's always some narrative about how some
secret holdover and you know, if you're gonna
if you're gonna certainly possible, right, that there's
a holdover from the Democrats or some secret
guy fighting Trump or a deep state you
know, that's always possible, whatever those things mean
to you. But if as we go through,
what, five different categories of multiple different examples
of spending,
it kinda becomes hard to make it about
one's holdover unless there's one in every category,
in every position, in every group, which then
becomes just his administration.
So you can decide how you wanna foresee
this. Recognize these things are still happening. So
this one I could go through each one
of these. There's like four that they just
kinda keep saying over and over. One of
which is circumcision and Mozambique, and we keep
hearing it because it sounds crazy, because it
is crazy.
Now when you understand, and this is not
in any way well, I should say first
of all that all of these categories,
I'm not highlighting this as good or bad.
Even though I definite at some points, I
will jump in and tell you my opinion.
But overall, it's not about whether these are
good or bad for this point today. It's
about the fact that we have been told
these things have been stopped, that this is
this is why we have to fight the
USAID plan, which I agree USAID is a
problem. Even though they're not doing that, they're
continuing it on the state department.
But they're saying this is why. Look at
all the dumb things they were spending. Okay.
Then if you think that, then ask then
stand back and explain to me why they're
continuing to fund those things and why that
makes sense. I just wanna trigger this critical
thought for people.
So one of the main things you hear
are things like that. Mozambique, Circumcision. Now what's
interesting before we go over just this one
category, and don't take this as me saying
this should be done, I wanna make a
very clear line here that I think, like
a lot of people in this country right
now think, even some that
want foreign spending for help for whatever they
believe whatever they believe they're gonna help people
around the world, that right now, most people
in this country are saying, how about we
just stop all of it until we figure
out what's going on? No spending of any
country of any kind, whether Israel or China
or anybody.
Nothing should leave this country
until we know that Americans' needs are met
and that this is something that we all
agree. That's what a lot of people feel
mostly Republicans, it seems.
That's why they thought they would end the
wars and Israel kept being funded and so
did the so did Ukraine, which, which by
the way still seems to be continuing despite
all the claims that it was already over.
But
Mozambique Circumcision is interesting because the main point,
you can just look at one of these
many different PolitiFact checks or whatever. This is
not to say that I agree this should
be done, but the point they make in
this, just the one I want to highlight,
is that circumcision
is is whether you fund it or not,
is done in this context because it apparently
is one of the best examples of, you
know, efforts that we could take in to
prevent the spread of HIV.
Now that's not to say good or bad
or I agree with it or don't. The
point is that that's the logic behind why
that was done, even if that's not what
they were doing, even if it was some
CIA cover for some regime change, which it
usually is. The point is to understand why
that's being done. Okay. So when they go,
most of them being circumcision, again, none of
us should be okay with that being spent
on for from our tax dollars. I wanna
I want you to recognize that just searching
for circumcision
under the dates from when they've been in
power since the moment they took over in
this administration,
you can see a lot. All of these
11 different things are funding something that mentions
circumcision. I'm only gonna show you four, two
of which specifically
relate to Mozambique.
So here
is one that says the Department of Health
and Human Services. This is most of them.
The trustees of Columbia and University in the
city of New York, The simple
point. There's a there's a long thing you
could read here. It goes over a lot
of health stuff. The main point, increased coverage
of HIV prevention, a services, including voluntary medical
male circumcision.
Okay. So if we're gonna be logically consistent
here, we might wanna ask why Donald Trump's
administration, specifically,
this month, has spent $14,000,000
to fund, in in part,
circumcision in in in this is specifically in
where was this, the location? I mean, honestly,
location should be irrelevant, but I believe it
was somewhere,
yeah, in Tanzania.
So it's kind of irrelevant. Mozambique, Tanzania.
And so the if you read it, the
whole thing, well, it's about HIV prevention. Now
my stance in most in this country is
that why are we funding that? Especially right
now, whether we want to do in the
future or not, why are we doing that
now when we have a lot of things
to worry about and we're all this
conversation, rightly so, about frivolous spending and democrat
secret stuff. Okay. So if we're recognizing that
they are still funding the exact same thing
to the tune of $14,000,000
in this one contract, when, by the way,
there's a hundred million dollars in total funding
that they're gonna continue to potentially dole out
because this contract is active as of right
here, you can see continually. Right? I mean,
this this is the March 6 is when
they funded this. $14,000,000
sustain and accelerate the comprehensive response in The
Republic Of Tanzania.
This alone should cause outrage to Republicans who
believed that they were stopping things like Mozambique
Circumcision.
No. They used that that ridiculous thing, so
is this, to get you to think that's
all it was, and we're winning because we
stopped all those things even though they're still
funding it.
That seems wild to me. Here's another one.
This one is right to care, also HHS.
It is for $15,000,000.652000.
Say and this is one day before that
one. This is on March fifth of this
year. Provision of voluntary medical male circumcision for
HIV prevention in The Republic Of South Africa.
So is it only Mozambique that we're upset
with, or is it the fact that we're
funding circumcision for whatever reason in other countries?
And if you are upset about that, then
you should be upset that Donald Trump's administration
is still literally doing that right now. Hasn't
stopped, and they funded some since they've taken
over. That's $30,000,000
so far just in these last two contracts.
Don't forget again that there's a whole bunch
of them. Plenty more. This is just under
grants. You can look under oh, actually, this
one only has grants.
But, I mean, this first one is for
a hundred and $6,000,000.
How about the next one? This one is
from also HHS.
They've spent 7,000,001
$7,100,000.
This was on March 17.
This is for HIV prevention, voluntary medical male
circumcision,
gender based violence prevention. Now, again, don't take
the funny thing is I'm not in some
of these, I'll, like, point out, like, diversity
stuff. It's not that I'm even saying good
or bad. I, again, don't think any of
it should be funded, but I'm just simply
pointing out that this is what Republicans would
likely be unhappy about and, of course, would
likely frame as a Democrat thing if it
wasn't being done explicitly under Trump's administration right
now in multiple ways. And let's also not
forget that health and human services is RFK
Jr right now.
All these are continuing.
K? Here you know? Now you're like, I'm
willing to bet you that you're gonna get
somebody on the right if this becomes a
story, which it likely won't because that's not
how the world works today, would make an
argument for why this is important because we
have to keep them from getting HIV because
that's only gonna spread and be a problem.
Look. You could make an argument. There's a
logical argument for why circumcision isn't important. Why
are we funding it? Isn't that the argument
they all just got done making? Why should
we have to fund those things? Let's have
some logical consistency today.
So these are important clips to put out.
I make they might make these myself tomorrow.
Okay. Let's talk about one that is simply
AIDS.
Just look up look for AIDS, and I
could've done HIV as well, which is probably
more results. But you can see there's 235
contracts. So let's recognize this is only from
January 20 until today.
235 contracts, 60 different contracts IDV. There's 85
grants. Now I look at grants because that's
what you're gonna get typically the USAID stuff,
the the kind of things that we're most
on guard about, but make sure you look
at all of these. All of these will
be included for you. Okay. So this one
is from HHS as well,
and it is for $2,500,000
funded just the March,
strengthening epidemiology and strategic information in The Republic
Of Zimbabwe under the president's emergency plan for
AIDS relief. Okay. Why are we funding that?
Why is it happening? It's still happening, guys.
It's continuing through Trump's administration. They're funding brand
new projects. Some of these started in 2025.
This one?
It looks like it closed on me here.
This one was oh, I think this was
just about the so this is USAID.
I wanna show you that this is
continuing through Rubio's state department run, which is
really how it always was, honestly,
a USAID.
And I wanna show you that and see,
the most of these are I didn't include
because people it's it's less impactful, I argue.
But I just wanna point out that on
the thirtieth
of so ten days after they took over,
they continued the contract. Community based violence prevention
and linkages to response in South Africa. So
I just wanna point out why is it
our responsibility to fund community based violence prevention
in South Africa.
Maybe there's more going on there. Aren't we
talking about South Africa a lot right now?
Maybe we should consider that they're still running
USAID
CIA regime change tactics in a place that
they're very politically interested in. Just a thought.
Okay. Here is one from
HHS, AIDS control program. Another one that is
just simply continuing.
This one
is been continued.
So it it remember when I was talking
when we we talked about this last time,
the action type means that they've revised it
and continue the program. So the program is
currently ongoing. They the month the last funding
was wait was, I think, back in 2024.
But still, the point is they've not just
ignored it, they have continued the program. And
you can see this one is for Uganda
Ministry of Health and to execute its core
mandate for a harmonized and sustainable health sector
response to HIV and AIDS. I could've put
that in the other category. Right? But the
point is USAID.
Oh, this is what HHS. The other one
was. The point is just continuing these same
programs. Now those are minor because they haven't
funded it more. Maybe tomorrow, they'll cancel it.
That's also possible. This one continued to be
funded. This is from HHS.
It is for access to community HIV testing
services and treatment.
K? This they gave them $790,000
on March 5 for HIV treatment
in
where was it?
Malawi, Malawi.
Okay. That's just under the HIV. Now, again,
recognize you can search all of these. There
are I mean, look. There's endless the contracts
ultimately is a hundred. Hundred pay 85 results.
All of those reference funding overseas for some
kind of grant for HIV.
Okay. This one
is for just for COVID. I thought that
was interesting to search for. So I've been
doing this kinda periodically, but looks like there's
a lot that's recently happened. So COVID nineteen.
Right? I mean, now this shouldn't be that
much of a stretch for people because of
Donald Trump's mRNA program he's rolling out. Clearly,
he still supports the COVID shot despite this
weird kind of cognitive dissonance in the entire
movement behind him, acting like he's somehow not
really meaning that, I guess. It's it's strange.
But here, there's all these contracts. Again, you
can include for yourself.
Here, just wanted to include this again because
I wanted to follow-up on this still, which
is the Moderna contract from the original contract,
which has still not ended. I found this
interesting. Because realistically, that was supposed to end
or I guess it's going to end in
April
2025.
But if the whole point was this is
something we're fighting, just recognize that as of
February 13,
they have continued supplemental agreement for work within
scope. They've continued the group to work with
Moderna. Now this is a smaller one because
we all I think we all know that.
They don't wanna be honest with themselves. Wanna
include that. This is one you should keep
track of. If they keep funding it beyond
April 15, I think that's relevant.
Here's one from
Department of Treasury.
Managed infrastructure data services COVID nineteen.
This is for
$5,100,000,
February eighteenth,
and it's simply about I personally, if you
could read more into it for yourself, is
the data structure around this. Remember, all they're
using all the data from what they gathered
for their program with Larry Ellison and Oracle
and SoftBank and that's star I'll just point
out the Stargate program again. I think this
is important because it's the information
data side of COVID nineteen, which does not
seem to be ending. They gave them 5
more million dollars. Right? Goes till 2030. Interesting
timing.
K. Here's one for Moderna also.
Or rather, MODEX therapy therapeutic. Excuse me. And
this is HHS.
Advance the development of potent cross reactive,
multispecific
antibodies for the prep countermeasures
of COVID nineteen and seasonal and highly pathogenic
avian influenza. Well, we know they're working on
that, guys, because they've already made one for
animals. They've already they've already continued to fund
a Moderna shot that Biden put forward
for avian flu and mRNA version. They're all
that's all happening still. Amazing what people can
ignore.
Potential amount up to $205,000,000,000.
Make sure or excuse me. That's I thought
I read that wrong. It's $205,000,000.
But the point is, more coming.
And
as of right now, they've just, as of
March, they've simply continued the program. Right? So
that means that is continuing. That's what that
means. Now here's one that's more important, I
find.
This one is for the Department of Transportation.
And it's specifically
the continuation
of this.
Section five three zero seven, American Rescue Plan,
total funding for this grant is amended with
the addition of the MTC phase two fund
allocation and now totals, if you can read
that properly, there's no commas, $536,000,000.
Now what I find fascinating about this is
that you can scroll down here, and you'll
find overlap. This is it says zero amount,
but it says continuation. And if you read
into it, it actually argues that they're giving
them more money, but in a different faith.
It's I think there's a lot of manipulation
going on to make it appear as if
things might not be happening when they are
and so on. Read into it for how
you will. This is just something for you
to look into. The amendment adds a project
to this grant for the MTC phase two,
the ARP funding, and adds the second allocation
of the $248,000,000.
This application utilizes act funding to prevent, prepare,
and to respond to the COVID nineteen coronavirus
pandemic. So why would we still need that?
The funds will only be used to prevent,
prepare, and to respond to coronavirus related activities.
Ah, now we see why. Because the broad
scope of just whatever falls under that category.
So I want you to recognize some of
those were funding. And oh, here. You you
can look into I was just looking on
grants. Oh, I didn't reload for you. The
link's in there.
There's a lot more in there. Some funded
still, some continued, but the m r the
COVID nineteen
specific is continuing. Let's just look up oh,
actually, I did mRNA last. We'll come back
to mRNA because that relates to some other
medical things. But I searched for climate change.
Now this one, you might find especially interesting
because
maybe even the HIV thing, you could make
some kind of broken argument even though it
contradicts what they just said for why he
might do that. Explain for me why the
Trump administration will be funding things in the
context of climate change.
The only way you could make sense of
this is if you wanna pretend somebody else
did all of these without his knowledge,
all recently,
or that they're supporting these for some other
reason that contradicts what they were telling you.
I wanna say before you even look at
these,
my point is not that I think that
they're all secretly believing in climate change. I
think that's a ploy. I think and whether
some
uninformed congressional people, which is what I see
most of them as, actually believe they know
everything when they're being their strings are being
pulled by all sorts of things, the reality
is they're just means to an end.
Some people buy into this stuff, but realize
just like the woke ideology for USAID
that was used like a lot of other
narratives going back decades to execute whatever they
wanna accomplish,
same as this. Now you have to realize
that right now looking overseas, I think even
some of these might be USAID.
No. I guess not. That was the earlier
ones. The point, nonetheless, is that when you're
fun when you're doing stuff like this, there's
usually an agenda involved. Now
maybe there are places around the world where
that net that excuse is still what's necessary.
I mean, you just got it. The point
is we don't know.
What we do know is that this is
still happening. Now this one's even more interesting
because they actually started funding this on 02/03/2025.
So this was not some carryover from the
Biden administration.
And this is from the EPA.
It reads, environmental
indicators and pollution modeling to support climate change
impact assessment.
Now, again, I'm not trying to say good
or bad. I mean, I I would even
argue in some context, not in the idea
of the politicized climate change concept, but just
the idea of monitoring the changes in our
environment might be necessary. And so don't take
this as good or bad. It's about hypocrisy.
This is not supposed to be what we're
told is happening if you believe the narratives.
So there you go. This is ten eleven
days after they took over, 397,000
for climate change research.
I find that interesting,
just specifically for hypocrisy.
This one's from NASA.
Landslide climate change experiment.
This one is for $200,000
on the twenty sixth, '6 days after they
took over.
This one is from
Department of Commerce.
They funded this a lot. Now this is
mostly in this month. So there was a
$1,500,000
spent in February 18.
Then from the March 6 to the March
12,
it looks like, you know, over almost $3,000,000.
No. Maybe, like, $2.02 2,000,005 2.5.
So altogether, a lot of money, millions of
dollars
just since they've taken over. The cooperate the
Cooperative Institute will employ third class researcher world
class, excuse me, world class researchers to conduct
science in service to society and in partnership
with NOAA,
which is a very, what is the what
does it stand for again? It's in here
somewhere.
The
I'll just look it up real quick if
I can't remember what it's in. It's it's
something that's very much related to climate change
conversation.
I was just reading about them
right there.
The
Atlantic Oceanic ocean oceanographic and meteorological
laboratory, but I think it stands for something
else.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Very much very much in line with the
climate change agenda. Now it says,
the Cooperative Institute will be supported by a
robust infrastructure committed to equity, education, and outreach,
climate science, and prediction.
Not good or bad, just simply something you
wouldn't believe Donald Trump's administration would spend $3,000,000
on
unless you understand that we're being lied to
about the the wedge issue back and forth.
And it's about something else entirely. This is
from the NSF, and this is interesting. It
says NEON operations
and maintenance. So I wanted to find out
what that was in particular. And the National
Ecological Observe Observatory Network or NEON is a
facility program
that that gathers and provides long term standardized
data on ecological responses to changes in land
and use in climate across The United States.
It is immersed in the climate change conversation.
NEON's data and observations focus on how land
use, climate change, and invasive species affect biodiversity,
disease ecology. Okay.
Whether you support it or not, the point
is that's something that seems to be against
what Trump seems to claim he supports. National
Ecological Observatory Network or NEON, it provides
key data to enable scientists to understand and
predict the changes and enable policymakers to potentially
lessen detrimental effects, pursuing advanced ecological and climate
research.
That one's for $18,000,000.
Now let's just even say you agree with
some of these things. Don't you think that
money could be better used to help what
a lot of people understand Americans need right
now? What about all the places you guys
reach? What about North Carolina? What about what
about Conyers, Georgia? What about all these different
places we've talked about that we are the
democrats were ignoring, and then we just skip
over that when it comes time for Trump
to have power?
This one is from EPA.
Can communities will have enhanced resilience to climate
change and sea level rise. Address climate resiliency
is one of the many parts of what
they're focusing on in this contract, and that's
for $5,700,000.
That was on the February 4.
This one is from the National Science Foundation,
and it says, address
a broad range of important scientific questions, including
significant insights into the impacts of global ocean
climate change in the next decade.
Right. So understand, I, myself included, very much
and I think it's absolutely factually proven that
the climate change narrative is a massive psychological
manipulation.
Not to say that we're not very obviously
destroying this planet in a hundred different ways.
Mostly the people that wanna point to that,
like, they wanna change something by stopping you
from driving your car. The reality is that
it is a manipulation
from the core point of the carbon discussion.
Not gonna dive into it all today. I've
gone through many different points. I highly recommend
James Corbett and plenty of others. The point
is this is them funding things in the
direction of stopping. What we all argue is
at least what a lot of I think
largely Republicans argue is a complete scam. How
do you explain
that? K. This one is for
the the two funding this weirdly both on
the same day, the March 10 this year,
$20.22
$2,700,000
and among the $2,300,000
to fight climate change Trump Trump's
administration. Seems weird, doesn't it? Well, here's one
overlap I find that maybe might be relevant.
This is from Wired, March 22. A mysterious
startup is developing a new form of solar
geoengineering,
you know, to fight climate change. Guess what?
It's it's called Stardust, an Israeli US startup.
What a surprise. Intends to patent its unique
aerosol technology for temporarily cooling the planet. Well,
gee, there's a lot of other things we've
talked about in the context of aerosol technology
or the idea of Israeli US startups and
what they might wanna accomplish in that ecosphere.
Or
as we get to something more interesting over
the idea of a golden dome that Trump
brought up, we'll get to that later in
the show,
You'll find it very interesting what he's referencing
as the iron dome, but once a US
version of it, which if you know deeper,
I'm not that's another whole rabbit hole. But
how the funding goes and how Israel's always
abused that, this this is just more
more funding manipulation for Israel. I promise that's
how it'll work out. But
what they
need to argue that it needs to be
done for the whole country, which is what
Trump's really stressing despite the billions and billions
of dollars that they can't even factor in,
surveillance.
Satellites,
sensors, surveillance in literally every place in this
country.
Yeah. But maybe just to keep you safe,
you know, from all the different rockets that
are always flying in this country, but
also something else.
So think about that when you have an
Israeli startup that's very much interconnected with the
Israeli intelligence that's not and that's not even
debatable, guys.
I'll include these articles.
Couple of the ones that reference that very
topic.
Just so you guys, if you want to
look further into this, there's a lot of
very obvious discussion about how Israel is I
mean, openly, by the way, like, legitimately
infiltrating
different dynamics and and publicly discussing it. The
prince the prince and the spy,
what Whitney wrote in 2023 for TLav, original
content for TLav. She has also posted on
an element hangout because, I mean, it's fine
by me. The point is that this is
a very important article. And the and it's
about and one of the main points is
not just how Erik Prince is literally working
for the Israeli spy apparatus while trying to
hawk a really fake
megaphone at you that is basically compromised by
Israel. That's even Wired pointed that out. The
point in this is about how it's obvious
that the Israeli intelligence, according to their own
discussions,
these startups are basically an extension of their
apparatus.
I was trying to quickly find in here,
but the point is simply that the the
yeah. It says right here, the stunning revelation
that is many Israeli companies, including Black Cube,
have been founded by for Esperance for Israeli
intelligence, and they openly
state that
as well
as the larger conversation about the infiltration of
Israel of the, you know, the the whole
country discussion. But in light of the pager
attacks,
very important to think about seeing as how
it's not just spying. It's it's military action
against whoever seems to be around, trim well,
mostly women and children when that happened, or
just the general Israeli global cybersecurity infiltration.
So think about how that's how crazy that
is. With what they're discussing, they need and
it's you know, this is a US Israeli
start up in regard to, like, your
atmospheric control. And they're also doing simultaneously
some kind of I mean, I actually include
this one too, by the way.
I keep forgetting about how much this connects.
It's so incredible.
This is another article from Derek Bros
about the satellite. This will be relevant. I'll
include all these for and remember this when
we get to the next one. This title
was you can't hide. Elon Musk and SpaceX
are helping US Intelligence build the world's largest
spy satellite network.
So, obviously, these things are completely overlapped with
Israeli intelligence. They this is not a secret.
Read it for yourself. National Wisconsin's office is
the deep state if you wanna make anything,
any case for what that might be. And
the point is, he says, now you can't
hide.
You're constantly being looked at. And he makes
a clear case how Elon Musk, because he's
helping with SpaceX, but also helping us build
out the AI because that's how this is
gonna work. So overlap that with a Israeli
startup for a aerosol technology to, I guess,
fight climate change, what that's even really about,
and how that is involved with the spying
and everything else. Keep all that in mind.
Now
remember where we just came from, though. The
re the point being,
why in the world is Donald Trump's administration
spending anything on climate change?
Daniel Price basically or Princeton pointed this out,
and Efrat Fungerson posted some other connected points
that you it's worth reading about the Israeli
startup in regard to climate change.
Now
just mRNA, I also think is relevant.
Because this is very clearly that's not even
a secret. Something that they're,
I mean, driving forward more than ever.
And this is these are two there's 250
grants just since they've taken over for mRNA.
It's also seven contracts.
Now this one is for HHS.
Very quickly go through these. The point, where
was it?
Oh, it looks like the highlighting wasn't on
there.
That's weird. But it's right here. So it
is for 620
30 $635,000
since they've taken over. That's February 20. And
And it's about mechanisms of mRNA, localization, and
transnational
translational control,
specifically in a certain but I what this
is all about, in my opinion, is research
around how this is affecting your body, which
by the way was exactly what happened during
the rollout. Now they're testing all these different
things and how mRNA
because clearly it didn't either didn't work or
that was just one stepping stone in their
experimentation.
HHS, here's another one. This is for
$725,000
since March, February 14.
Biochemistry
of pre mRNA splicing. The central goal of
this project is to understand fundamental mechanisms of
human pre mRNA splicing.
Yeah. That sure sounds fun. Pharmacological
techniques, in addition to obtaining new insights.
The point is they're using pharmac in one
case, far so vaccines.
In addition to obtaining new insights into basic
mechanisms of gene expression, these studies will improve
the understanding of numerous mutations associated with various
genetic diseases or, you know, whatever their shots
cause that they blame on gene genetic diseases,
as well as facilitate correct genetic diagnoses
and therapeutic development for such diseases.
So mRNA research for mRNA products.
This is being done by HHS. That's RFK
Jr. Let's be clear. This this by the
way, this is going all the way till
2027. Apparently, this started in 1998.
So this is a long term funding direction,
and let's act like this was some big
thing they discovered. And just all of a
sudden, this is the direction. Though, like we
said to start, it's about long term building
blocks. The rest is noise, guys. Pay attention
to what they have what the outcomes have
been consistently.
Right now, seems pretty obvious they're continuing this
program.
Now this is also HHS, also RFK Jr.
Now this is really interesting to me. This
one goes into point 26, working with the
University of California, and it says natural killer
cell engineering to target the HIV reservoir.
HIV continues to be a global health concern.
You do you agree with that? That has
claimed the lives of millions.
It says the goal of this research project
is to develop new methods to enhance the
intrinsic killing activity of these, what they what
they're called, natural killer cells or NK cells,
and to develop natural killer cell based kick
and kill strategies
to reduce the need for lifelong
art by decreasing,
decreasing, or eliminating latent viral reservoirs. Now the
framing is as going after these cells into
your body that are these latent reservoirs of
of HIV.
But as we know, as we should,
these things are very much applicable to so
enhancing the natural killer cells, I argue, could
be a dubious product. It says engineer natural
killer cells to enhance their elimination of HIV
infected cells using an innovative nonviral mRNA transfection
technology. Great. So mRNA based natural killer cells
to go after what they aim them at.
Hey. I mean, I'm not an expert on
some you tell me what you think about
this. I think my point is is simply
mRNA direction.
And this one is for about $750,000,
both funded on 02/13/2025.
This one is for HHS as well.
Specifically, it says, we will study the fundamentals
of SARS CoV two. There's plenty of people
in his I think a lot on his
on his side of the conversation. He doesn't
even believe that's real.
Specifically, the development in the lungs of the
ACE two trans in in in transgenic mice.
So, apparently, we're still doing gain of function
research, which I let's be clear. I think
we all know that never stopped. We will
examine if lung
TRM cells contribute to the protection afforded by
mRNA vaccines to better understand the role, if
any, of memory t cells in mediating protection
to SARS CoV-two and notable variants of concern.
We're going well, this is right back into
the beat the meat of that lie of
that entire COVID nineteen deception.
We extend and com complement our studies in
mice to doctor
Farber's human donor repository
to assess human memory formation
following SARS CoV-two infection and vaccination.
Yeah. Nothing can go wrong there. I'm sure.
This is
for $863,000
as of
February twenty fourth of this year.
Now you tell me if you think those
things matter. I quite frankly think all of
that shows you shocking levels of just of
hypocrisy. But as usual, guys, this stuff won't
get pointed to, won't get highlighted other than
our circles, and it's this is the way
this works, but get it in front of
people that need to see it. Or this
is not about trying to have some kind
of viral sensation. This is about trying to
save people's lives and show people who are
fighting against or wrongly believing the power structures
on their side to show them what's really
going on so we can make accurate, informed
decisions.
Right? I mean, whether you believe the which
I don't, that your vote translates, an informed
electorate or rather just an informed population is
the most important thing that we can have,
like, in the context of real change, in
my opinion. But as Kamas highlights and just
to highlight back to the mRNA direction and
really just to show you this again that
Trump is quite literally as you don't if,
hopefully,
you know, if you don't, you'll probably be
shocked. He's rolling out an mRNA cancer platform
that will evolve into just a platform for
mRNA shots for literally everything.
Now that's not what they've stated, but they
they have stated it will evolve into other
shots. But remember, the core point of the
mRNA platform, which is what this is, is
to evolve into literally everything. They they they've
made this case so many times over the
years. This is Trump partners with Net Technocrats
to promote mRNA injections, artificial intelligence, and transhumanism.
Stargate.
Now
in mind that they're making mRNA shots, here's
Camus pointing out something that, well, Camus included,
myself included, a lot of us were screaming
about right in the middle of the COVID
nineteen lie, which Trump still supports the shot,
by the way. According to the Ohio based
Academic Medical Center, large numbers of the COVID
vaccinated, quote, may need heart transplants to avoid
a sudden cardiac arrest. Man, where have you
heard that before?
You know, all those times we're being screened
down from pointing out the sudden collapsing athlete's
point. You know, the guy that got hijacked
by bombastic morons out there that made fake
documentaries about all riddled with falsehoods
around a true story in order to hide
the bigger topic. The reality is this was
obvious and provable in 2021.
I mean, I bet you I can just
search for one of them and it'll pop
up.
Oh, here. That's actually perfect. It's the search
for collapsing athletes on the website. Look it
up for yourself and recognize that most of
this coverage for us was 2021.
Collapsing athletes and the claims of Pfizer being
that's that's November 2021.
Collapsing athletes, twenty twenty one. Children athletes are
collapsing and dying from sudden cardiac arrest at
unprecedented levels, November 2021.
Proven, guys. Literally. I'm not talking, like, that
we knew every one of them was that,
but literally, by every measure, every peer reviewed
study, one was from FIFA, one was just
childhood sports, showing you the amount of people
collapsing that we can even prove, and we
knew it was more than that, was shockingly
higher than any year before it in any
context.
Now in not in an honest ecosystem of
information, that would have been wildly viral because
it's a huge story, and it got shut
down. But there was plenty of us talking
about this.
So on that point,
recognize that that's what this this is just
more science backing this up now. It says,
however, the pro vaccine nonprofit has yet to
issue the red alert to the public about
the looming catastrophic
death wave. You know what that reminds me
of? Like, Red Cross refusing to acknowledge that
they
still that they base that there is provable
that the spike protein or whatever we're discussing
does translate into the blood and stay in
the blood for six months or a lot
longer than that, and they have refused to
acknowledge that to this very day even though
they continue to give that blood out. You
know, that's not an accident, guy. That's willful
dishonesty. That is I mean, you could call
that's a crime. I mean, I didn't that's
not even you've called. That is a crime.
They should go to jail for what they're
doing. But there's more coordination than we realize.
So continuing, it says, instead, Cleveland Clinic quietly
dropped the bombshell in a recent update on
its website. You know, it's buried it somewhere
so they can argue that they weren't liable
for not pointing it out. According to the
Cleveland Clinic, mass mortality is expected to surge
due to a ticking time bomb of myocarditis
among the COVID vaccinated.
Bombshell.
And don't you guys wait. I'm sure you
can expect some sort of the we are
the media now ecosystem of Elon Musk putting
out a limited version of this in very
democrat siloed discussions
when it's necessary. That's how this new limited
hangout drip system works.
But recognize you already know this, and it's
not just one side, and the current president
absolutely supports it, so does Biden.
Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle or
myocardium. The my the inflammation weakens your heart
muscle, and you would know all this. The
point is that this is very real, and
it does include the link to the the
the, the article, which does include the link
to the study.
Now Jikki Leaks, as you guys will know
know well from this show, the review paper
is groundbreaking because it summarizes all the ways
the spike protein interferes with DNA damage and
repair, I e is why do they say
that? On on cogenic?
I would argue that I think that's cancer
causing, or let's look it
up. Causing develop yeah. Causing development of a
tumor or or cancers.
But we weren't allowed to know that when
the genetic vaccines,
which make your own cells produce spike proteins
for months, I think it's much longer than
that. The the most studies I've seen say
six months or longer because the study ends
in six months and it continues to make
them. But it says we rolled out because
that would induce unnecessary fear and anxiety. Basically,
saying that would have scared you. That shows
you that all they wanted was you to
take it regardless of the risks. It says,
so instead, NIH recruited Eric Fried to have
the first and most important paper retracted. Okay.
So you know all that's even watching this
show or if you follow Jake Hughley's because
it's important.
What you should recognize is that even to
this very moment, they're not telling you that.
And they're still promoting a shot even more
so one for cancer. That's the Stargate program.
That should be insulting,
disgusting, and chilling all at the same time,
especially since you argue that this person's saving
you from all these big bad things.
Well, this is interesting, by the way. I
saw this right before I went live. Oh,
it's weird. Didn't test didn't tweet that or
GAB that, whatever you call it. On GAB,
this is Peter Bobach sharing June June doctor
Jane Ruby's tweet, and And I did look
it up, and I this is right before
I went live, so I'm not gonna go
any deeper on it, but this is interesting.
Trump will nominate acting acting CDC director Susan
Manares. Okay. So a Biden holdover. Maybe that's
so they can blame everything on her in
six months when they continue to go in
the same direction. That's probably how this works.
But the point is she is being
put in that position. And as Jane Ruby
points out, Trump appoints baby killer as new
CDC director. The point is about the COVID
shots. And here's a tweet saying the updated
COVID shot is here. CDC recommends everyone six
months or older get the shot. Yeah. We
know how that worked out, guys. They're killing
children,
but they all still support it. And now
Trump has literally put another person in place
who is part of the problem, like the
guy that's talking seed oils at you. You
know, it's all
pretending this is still?
I'll
include this for you. One last thing on
the health side of this that I think
is important is just there's so many things
falling at the side here.
We've talked about PFAS for quite a long
time. Actually, I should grab this one too
since this is crazy that this is still
there.
We we how long have we talked about?
I mean, really, I think we've talked about
it well before
East Palestine.
But during that, it became another big topic
because they recognized what there was a huge
release of PFAS and all that that was
part of the problem, but largely dioxins.
But before that, we've talked about this. The
forever chemicals conversation that basically people knew about,
but the main conversation, mainstream and the government
left and right, wanted to pretend like it
wasn't there.
Well, this is after we were all talking
about this. This is from March 2023. It
says exposure to PFAS or forever chemicals,
quote, can reduce women's fertility by forty percent.
Four zero.
That's insane.
And then we just went back to going
went back to our lives. Who cares? Right?
I mean, and and in fact, don't forget,
Biden's administration pushed the idea that they couldn't
stop these because, you know, national security, the
military. That's what they argued. So if you
want another alignment
to show you that both these sides are
the exact same damn thing when it comes
to what matters,
Trump halting the e of EPA limits on
PFAS in drinking water.
A tragic setback,
Long Island environmental says. Now you'll find some
broken argument from the the team sport side
to make this some kind of awoke, you
know, climate change. It it's very real and
obvious and has nothing to do with either
of those things. It has to do with
your government, all sides of it continuing to
poison you or not caring what they do.
So when you remove this,
you're creating an opening for them to make
it even worse without concern. That's what the
that's the conversation about removing regulation. That's how
they frame it. It's not for you. It's
not making your life better. It's not stopping
government control of your life. It's removing regulation
from big companies that make money at your
expense. Freedom. We're winning. Right? President Trump has
withdrawn a Biden administration plan. It wasn't happening.
To be clear, I do not believe for
a second that Biden was in fact even
gonna do anything about it, set new limits
on chemical discharge and drinking water. Why would
you stop something like that? He says state
regulators in around The US have been waiting
for the the EPA to take the lead,
which they never will. These people, I don't
believe, for a second actually care about you
because they've lied about every one of these
last conversation we've had, whether it's Conyers, whether
it's East Palestine. Scott C Smith calls them
out. They're lying to you guys. They know
they're at some level, somebody at this position
knows they're lying.
They've known about dioxins for decades. They don't
wanna tell you about it.
I was just gonna I had this highlight.
I guess I didn't make the screenshot of
it, but the point was simple that this
is that, you know, Lee Zeldin. Remember, you
know, the whole gold bars from the Titanic
that Alex Jones wanted you to believe were
actually gold bars somehow from the Titanic even
though it makes no sense. The point is
that they're very clearly telling you
during his hearing that it was a priority.
No. Maybe he believes that, but Trump doesn't
care. Either or however you look at it,
the point is it's not gonna happen, at
least so far. Maybe they'll go back tomorrow.
But this is insane to me because of
how obviously dangerous this is, and this is
nothing but the interest of reg of military
and and corporations.
Now discussing the larger conversation of how a
lot of this leads into one, you know,
from a global perspective to whatever you wanna
call it. Whether we're talking about globalism,
imperialism,
technocracy,
Zionism, they're all intertwined with this same agenda.
And this is the show we did on
January 8. As Israel's Globalist ambitions become clear,
TeamSport Republicans endorsed North American Union.
That was the whole point about the very
clear long term new world order plan or
the sustainable development goals, whatever map you wanna
look at that may that shows you one
continent
for all of Mexico, Greenland, United States, all
of it.
And that's right now what they're still working
towards. It hasn't gone away, which I find
incredible. We'll come back to that as well,
Or that right here. No. That's coming up
here somewhere along the line. Forget where I
put that today. But the point is simply
that we're talking about the idea of Panama,
of all these different examples.
You know, we were all told you're all
being trolled. I can't believe you fell for
that. And as they continue to happen.
Here, first, is the interesting overlap of this
whole common wealth point that we talked about
already. Right? The reason I find this so
interesting is because it's it's a continuation of
the same expansionist globalist idea, showing you they're
all really interconnected and they're all just I
mean, I that's what I see anyway. But,
obviously, this is no
I mean, even at the point to where
Alex Jones felt the need just pretend to
call it out. That's how I see it
anyway. Like, he does often, where he steps
in and goes, if hell, he's never not
do this. Trump. I don't know. Trump could
be lying to us all and goes right
back to buying everything he does and selling
you everything he wants.
Tesla's included these days, it seems.
So we'll see. Maybe that was his breaking
point. Maybe he's gonna freak out if he
does this, or maybe it was all a
lie to make it appear as if he
pushed back. Like, the point is
it's interesting that this is the only way
it gets called out. But Donald Trump shared
this. I love King Charles. Sounds good to
me. And that's, of course, about and but
the basically being invited back into the Commonwealth
of the UK.
I just wanna include that for you so
you can see the actual tweet.
This is the original article we talked about.
Donald Trump suggests The US could join British
Commonwealth,
which again, they make the point that that's
for every one of them are are former
colonies of The UK, which will there so
too would be United States if they enter
back into it. And that's something that we
fought away from. That was the founding of
The United States understand.
So for him to just pretend like that's
no big deal, regardless of whether it's,
you know,
symbolic or not, It's this is just the
exactly what Republicans thought they were fighting against.
The the continual overlap of this whole apparatus.
But now you're gonna find people to try
to make an argument for why that all
makes sense.
Now Alex came out
on March 22 and said, I got a
message for Donald Trump. If you really try
to make America join the British Commonwealth, seventeen
seventy six will commence again.
So in other words, we'll we'll revolt against
the government, which is just, you know, I
I it's the game that they're playing right
now, I think, is obviously about destabilization.
But, again, maybe he really believes that. Maybe
that's aligned for him. But ask yourself why
none of the rest of everything else is
aligned for him. Whether it's the shots or
the new world order or the globalism or
Zionism. Oh, that's all okay. But if he
joins back with this, which is even I
mean, obviously, largely symbolic for a lot of
reasons, but I argue there's much more around
that than what we can see improve.
Nonetheless, it finds I find this to be
hollow. I find this to be, you know,
she doth
protest too much kind of a thing. Americans
everywhere are shocked by Trump's announcement that he
may attempt to put King Charles at the
head of The United States Of America, which,
I mean, I don't think you would frame
it that way. That's not exactly correct, but
it definitely would be the argument of there's
some kind of a hierarchy even if symbolic
of The UK or the king.
Literally reversing the world changing achievement of the
revolution '19 '70 '6. Or excuse me excuse
me, 1776.
Then, of course, and this is what I
find relevant, he puts us out the next
day.
Powerful intel.
Don't really need those things. It says the
remnants of the British empire formed the heart
of the globalist economic and cultural control system
that has operated for decades.
Now King Charles' secret proposal
to president Trump is a desperate attempt for
the NWO
to survive using America's wealth and power. You
know, the same NWO
that he doesn't call out in the things
he's supporting that Trump's doing.
Inconsistency. But here's what I find most interesting.
Okay. Let's just take this at face value
and say that King Charles is in his
proposal is the NWO trying to take advantage
of Trump. Okay. So if that's the case,
why wouldn't you be calling out Trump right
now? Not in the sense of if you
do this, then. How about right now seeing
as how Donald Trump is clearly still leaning
into that or even the fact that he
proposed it or rather said sounds good to
me?
I'm just trying to highlight a small point
of if this guy is okay, that sounds
good, to what you're claiming is the NWO
trying to manipulate The US, doesn't that cause
a problem for you right then? Why would
you still support this person? If he's seemingly
either too blind to see that as much
despite all of you screaming at him, which
you know he sees,
or he doesn't care.
I find that very, very telling. There's just
so much obvious hypocrisy and inconsistency and logic
in the partisan field. According to Daily Mail,
the king is expected to offer to make
The US the fifty seventh member of the
Commonwealth at a time when America's relationship with
the EU has been strained over Ukraine, this
ongoing war with Russia, which frankly I mean,
I know there's division
from individuals, but from the large agenda, Frank,
I find a lot of this to just
be noise, but I could be wrong. The
offer is being seen as a way to
bolster The US and United Kingdom's so called
special relationship
despite America having famously split from the British
rule in seventeen hundreds. The two countries have
frequently worked together on foreign policy in the
twentieth and twenty first century. So,
clearly, this is continuing. It hasn't happened yet,
but Trump has so since said, that sounds
good to me, and that's where it stopped.
My point will be that wouldn't be a
well, if you do the thing that you
like, that's a problem. You should be going,
how are you not calling that out, Trump?
Why does it sound good to join with
something you've been famously pushing back against?
You see, it's I my opinion, and when
this comes to pass, we'll talk about it,
is that I don't think anything's gonna change.
I think that eat one or two things.
Either this is going to happen, which I
just think will be very, very on it's,
like, too clumsy, too on the nose. It's
obvious. Right? But we've seen other things like
that. Israel's doing it every day. My point
would be if it does happen, then you're
gonna see a rationale
for why it's in the interest of America
even if it's not, and you'll see Jones
tow that line.
Mark my words. Or secondarily or, you know,
the one of the two options would be
that it never was going to happen, that
it was all floated in order to present
the idea that we're, you know, I'm gonna
challenge him if he does the wrong thing
even though you're blindly accepting everything else that's
happening.
That seems like more likely to me, but
you guys can decide, and we'll see when
it happens.
Now in the context of other things that
Jones and the rest aren't calling out, which
I find more clear, is that Epstein files.
What happened to that, guys?
Forbes reports FBI reportedly asked agents to prioritize
Epstein documents and limit redactions.
Okay. This is March 22. So we're gonna
pretend that they've been doing this for, what,
months now? And we're gonna act like only
just now. March 22? No. We've we've suddenly
asked to reprioritize.
Yeah. Maybe they can pull away from all
those antisemitism
investigations that we've provenly shown you that that
we've proven that they are investigating.
Like, remember that it came out very clearly
that they even and this is reported by
the FBI or rather specifically,
I think it was from the the state
department. Either way, it was reporting
pretty widely reported that they had pulled from
human trafficking investigations in order to focus on
anti Semitic
investigations around the campus protest.
That alone should have been a tipping point
for the people largely and rightly so, the
largest group calling out a very clear problem
of that very discussion, whether it's human trafficking
excuse me. Human trafficking, pedophilia,
sexual abuse in children. These are very real
topics that exist at the highest levels of
power. That's not a quest or it's a
provable fact.
Dennis Hassart was third in line the president
as the speaker. Right? President Vice as the
speaker, third in line, and ultimately
was
proven to be a serial child molester according
to the judge. There's many of those examples.
The point is that why would you pull
away from something that serious to investigate antisemitism?
Well, you know why, guys, if you're honest
with yourselves. In this case,
this is interesting because I don't think we're
gonna get anything out of this. And right
now, suddenly, I think they're just trying to
keep you on the key you know, kind
of they're they're leading you by the nose
right now. That's what I think.
Here's what Forbes says.
The FBI is directing some agents to set
aside other work and prioritize redacting files. Okay.
Why is that only happening on twenty second?
I mean, this is clearly a very important
thing to his the largest support base he
has. Why would it why would it be
dragging this long? Well, there are other things
pulling at Donald Trump. Other things that have
nothing to do with what Americans want. You
have to see that by now.
And it says and prioritize redacting files, which
is a whole other conversation, related to disgraced
financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein for release.
Multiple outlets reported Sunday as pressure mounts after
the last month's file release was largely considered
a dud,
which I wanna point out something important here.
Their whole game has been that this is
some kind of extra. Well, I'll wait to
get to the the the paragraph here. Says
the FBI told The Wall Street Journal and
has prioritized transparency
with the Epstein files,
and all appropriate administrative and legal requirements
are being adhered to.
Continuing down, it says, it's unclear.
Attorney general Pam Bondi has that's weird. It's
unclear.
It's unclear, period. Attorney general Pam Bondi has
promised for weeks more Epstein files will be
released.
But neither she nor the FBI have provided
a specific timeline,
which by the way,
can you I mean, as always. If it
was the right now, you Democrats are rightly
pointing this out because they hate they it's
a divide and conquer dynamic. If it was
Biden doing this, you know the republicans pulling
their hair out screaming about how this is
a cover up. But, you know, most of
the team sport political side just seem well,
that's what they do, seem to be focusing
on whatever they're being pointed to right now.
Tesla terrorists, apparently, is the only thing they
want they wanna talk about. That's only the
minority of the teams who are Republicans,
in my opinion.
But it says,
but neither she they they provide a timeline.
Bondi said last week she had received a
truckload
of new documents
relating to Epstein,
which she had previously accused the FBI of
withholding from the Department of Justice. Okay.
As of I've said this six times now.
Why isn't anybody asking for that person? Who
is it? What group?
March them out in front of us. Why
aren't they being arrested? Wouldn't that be the
deep state? If they're the ones that are
still at the FBI who are withholding information
and you guys made a big old stink
about that, why haven't we seen somebody held
accountable for that?
I think y'all know why. Because I think
it didn't actually happen. I think this is
about dripping this out in hope, waiting to
see if we buy it. And we didn't,
so they step into the next argument. And
it's always easy to say some older person,
some holdover that we can't verify was a
Biden democrat.
Why wouldn't that person be caught in charge
of the crime?
Oh, it says and said FBI director, Kash
Patel, would give her a deadline on when
he can go through the documents to protect,
of course, the victims of sex traffic.
No. There is oh, that's what it was.
I'm sorry. I missed the for asking the
question. The question was, when will more Epstein
files be released? And it says, it's unclear.
That's what that was. And then down here,
it says, is there a so called Epstein
list
and what will be on it?
Now look. People talking about this, I'm pretty
sure, unless it become just kind of like
a you know?
I don't think people are referencing this as
some kind of one page list.
The idea is where is the compilation
of the information showing who was actually using
his services? You damn well know that is
what they have.
So the point is,
will there be an Epstein list and what's
on it? They say, no. There is no
evidence pointing to the existence of an Epstein
list. So you guys know where this is
going, which conspiracy theorists believe contains the names
of Epstein's clients and associates who may have
participated in or known about his crimes.
They even referenced the writer from Miami Herald
who did a really good job on this
in the past, which kinda seems how this
stuff tends to go where she's arguing, that's
fake. It's not real. That's only slandering people.
Well, guys, we're not talking about some notepad
with a list of names on it. We're
talking about wherever it's held in multiple files.
The lists
the list
the names of people who were using his
services.
So we're gonna pretend that they can't compile
that into one list and show us who
they are? I think that's what we all
know is happening here, guys, because that includes
both left and right. It includes judges and
congressmen. It's I think we know that.
I also think it's very obvious that it
ties back to Israeli influence on this government.
And all of that, the Zionist
task force that's conducting this investigation around all
of the things, including that Israel killed JFK,
are totally not gonna show you that outcome.
And lastly, it says,
the justice department gave several popular right wing
influencers binders, which read the Epstein files phase
one.
And you know why that I mentioned this
at the time. You know why I find
that especially relevant?
Oh, listen. I I have I haven't mentioned
this in a long time, but every single
show for as far back as you can
look, Instagram censors this show. It happens every
day. It just got shut down every day.
I don't know why they don't just kick
me off the platform.
But
if it was phase one right? So phase
one, obviously, that implies that there are more
phases to come. Obviously.
So if we're to believe that they put
that out
with the intention of releasing more files, then
why did Pam Bondy act like she was
aghast at how we didn't even know I
dumped all these files on us, and we're
gonna hold them accountable for not
so you see the in the inconsistency
there? This is them responding to your reaction.
Right? So phase one is to let you
maybe if they don't buy it, maybe they'll
just be quiet because they think more is
coming. And then when we go, wait. It's
all redacted, and there's no information in here.
She goes, oh, wait a minute. A truckload
just landed in my lap, and we didn't
even know. Well, more will be coming. Then
why it was why was it phase one
then?
See, there's obvious ways to see through this
if you're just paying attention. The reality is,
guys, they're dripping this out in ways that
will never change the conversation. That's my opinion.
I hope I'm wrong. I hope we get
all the information, and it all changes everything.
But how do we not see by now
that this is dishonest?
There's a lot happening that shows us simple
and obvious dishonesty.
Now here is a,
I'm not familiar, but it's a kind of
more partisan article written about this. So just
give you more of the perception of the
right on this. FBI spent the weekend redacting
Jeffrey Epstein files.
And you'll notice very clear criticism here.
Attorney general Pam Bondi and FBI director Kash
Patel still haven't lived up to their promise
to release the DOJ records and notorious on
notorious deceased sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, but agents
are reportedly working around the clock,
including over the weekend. That may we keep
hearing this. I don't know why.
Oh, they're working extra hard and diligent, are
they? You know, it's just so funny that
we just get these narratives and people just
report it. It's like,
there's they're they should be doing this already.
It should already be done. There's no reason
they should be going this long and why
they're all of a sudden ramping up their
efforts because they want you to think that
they're doing their best.
It's all narrative to me.
So CNN reported Saturday that, quote, FBI agents
are working around the clock, summoned twelve hour
shifts. So funny enough. So now you got
Republicans are taking a face value as CNN
tells you? That's interesting. Even though I'm just
that's a joke I'm making really because the
point is check it for yourself. It's not
about the report. It matters, but it's ultimately
about the source. Not CNN is saying that,
but where do they get that information from,
where you can verify it. It says, quote,
for much of the week, agents could be
seen filing into a room at FBI headquarters
with all with some also doing the work
on field offices in New York and the
FBI offices. Wait. So you're telling me you
have multiple offices simultaneously
redacting and working on files at the same
time?
How does that make sense?
Especially with something this serious.
But it says for for hours, agents sit
at banks of computers
using editing software to identify redactions required under
federal laws, including privacy act. The material also
includes video. Oh, that's interesting. You think you're
gonna get video files? Probably not. What I
think is interesting though is that why would
they why is it on March 22 are
they making this weird painted picture? They're working
for hours around the clock all the weekends
now.
Wouldn't this be what they should have presented
right in the beginning? It just seems like
kind of a
a you know, you know I'm skeptical, guys.
I'm inherently skeptical, but it just kinda gives
you the feeling of trying to get you
to think we're working extra diligent just because
it's not happening. Or maybe just decided, you
know, something's taking this long. I mean, the
obvious point to make is that they're redacting
things. So how could we take it at
face value? How could we ever know? I
mean, look, I'm you can make valid arguments
for why that should happen in some cases.
But I don't don't ever tell me national
security. That is not something I'm ever gonna
go along with. But, you know, people's personal
information. Yes.
And victims that don't wanna be named. Absolutely.
But it's only a u
they will use that to remove things they
don't want you to see, and you damn
well know it.
A justice official says that even if the
latest tranche of documents doesn't satisfy questions from
critics,
the department is satisfied
that the public will end up having access
to more documents
and evidence than they would have if Bondi
hadn't ordered the review. Oh, good. So we
have more meaningless information about things that don't
relate to the case, but it's more evidence,
though. It's the same with the JFK files,
guys. They came out and they released a
bunch of stuff that didn't change anything, most
of which was already there as I as
I talked about with with,
Corey Hughes, who's an expert on the topic.
He made very clear points about how a
lot of it was red herrings meant to
get you down raw rabbit holes that would
lead you in the wrong direction.
That's why there's not much about it, guys.
It's it was a it it was a
deception. Just like it was the first time,
but Trump acts like oh, shit. I'll hold
off on that. We're gonna get to that
next one of these next tabs. But up
here, it says justice and FBI officials don't
believe the new documents set to be released
in the coming days will contain any bombshells.
It's exactly what they said about JFK.
They're already priming you.
They're telling you it's not gonna so we
know that we're not gonna get the picture.
And she's telling you right here.
You're gonna get something, so be be happy
with that.
CNN's report comes about a month after the
White House staged a public publicity stunt. This
is a Republican platform in which a gaggle
of pro Israel Conservative Political Commentators
were providing binders providing binders that read the
Epstein files.
It turns out all the documents in the
binders have already been released. You think they
didn't know that, guys? Come on. And that
the binders contained more redaction than the already
public documents. Think about how dumb that is.
Things that were already out, and they redacted
more than was needed. It was already public.
That is what you're dealing with. And these
are the people we're talking about. A bunch
of very clear pro Israel partisan grifters that
are not actually trying to inform you, in
my opinion.
And it says
where would we leave off?
Bondi later blamed the FBI duplicity
for her phony disclosure.
Phony disclosure, they call it. I agree. Alleging
that the bureau's new off the new work
New York office has been suppressing hundreds of
documents. Okay then. Where's the crime?
Where's the holdover Democrat that's been doing all
of this? March them out in chains. Right?
If that doesn't happen, you damn well know
that's not real.
Or at the very least, there's a reason
they can't do it because they don't expose
something that puts them at risk. It's not
about accountability, guys. They're not fighting the deep
state. They're cementing the deep state.
Quote, I learned from a source that the
FBI field office in New York was in
possession of thousands of pages of documents, Pam
Bondi says, related to the investigation indictment of
Epstein.
By 8AM tomorrow, February 28, the FBI
will deliver the full and complete Epstein files.
Why didn't we get that to begin with?
Are you gonna are we really gonna pretend
that they okay. Here's two one of two
things. If they didn't know that was the
full picture, even though random
independent, meaty people knew because it was already
public, that's terrifying that they don't even know
that. Well, it shows you how incompetent, inept
they are for this position. Secondarily or alternatively,
they knew it was limited and hoped you'd
buy it.
Obviously. I mean, either either they're incompetent or
they lied to you. And so now they're
saying,
now we're gonna get the full thing, including
all records, documents, audio, and video. I guess
they didn't know that was missing the first
time. And materials related to Epstein and his
clients. Ah, so there is a list.
There is a list regardless of how such
information was obtained.
Okay.
So why would you alter why would you
tell us otherwise that there's not really a
list? That's kind a conspiracy theory, but then
make sure you tell us we have a
client's well, that is what we want, the
list of the clients, whether it's independent different
documents you put together or not. Do you
really think we're gonna get that?
And even if we do, how can we
take it at face value that it's the
full picture?
I think it's very interesting.
Simon Godek says,
Epstein was most likely a Mossad agent running
a honey trap to ensnare powerful figures so
Israel could blackmail them. Think about how that
is related to today.
The most disturbing part, he says, the first
version of the Epstein files has now been
handed to influencers who openly support the very
agency Epstein had was working for.
Selective disclosure, narrative control, damage management, what a
disgrace.
I simply said, how are those files coming
along, DCDryno?
You just got a Twitter file. So that's
what it is, guys. This is just an
extension of the Twitter files game. You base
it on the clout of the people who
are showing it to you, and you and
you pretend like that's everything. That's what's happening.
Now this one I find interesting. Just it's
related in a certain way, but I wanted
to fit it in somewhere because I find
this to be pretty crazy. Trump brags about
publishing innocent people's Social Security numbers. Now you
could fit this in a lot of ways.
It could just be clumsy incompetence.
But I get the sense that this is
about, like, the the
the anonymous kind of, you know, the personal
information,
doxing,
you know, transparency, like, the idea of not
being anonymous anymore in general. But you that's
just an
overarching potential point. What happened
here is he's claiming that he
included their Social Security numbers of dead people
just because we wanted to make sure you
got everything on the JFK files even though
we now know for sure that that was
very clearly not what we got. We got
a select and edited, known nothing new, many
many deceptions,
but because you got dead people's Social Security
numbers, which by the way turned out to
be people who are not dead,
he wants you to believe that you got
everything. That that's how this game is being
played. Now it could just be incompetence. They
thought that maybe they thought they were dead.
Maybe they didn't check. They thought that would
make it look like you were more real.
That that these people seem to be
flying by the seat of their pants.
It says Donald Trump bragged about releasing the
Social Security numbers of hundreds of people during
the anticlimactic release of JFK files.
Quote, he says 80,000 pages of the documents
is a lot to sift through. A reporter
said to Trump I don't even think we
got 8,000 pages. It says, can you can
you just tell us who killed Kennedy? That's
what the reporter asked.
Quote, well, you know, I was given the
task of releasing that, he says. Many presidents
have gone through it, and they haven't released.
Well, they have. Just like you the last
time, it wasn't anything new. And I said,
quote, release.
He did it. And he says, we even
released Social Security numbers.
And by the way, even for a dead
person seems like a really weird and strange
thing to do since it doesn't help anybody,
but it does create the possibility for fraud.
Now it says, I didn't want anything deleted
even though they deleted and hit a lot.
It says,
they said, so what about Social Security? People
long gone.
We gave Social Security. We gave everything, and
the rest is to for you to look
at.
These Social Security numbers, the article reports, are
from potentially hundred of people who are alive,
not long gone. Now had they just been
arguing that with no evidence, I wouldn't be
reporting it to you. Turns out, one of
them, a Reagan era justice department attorney and
Trump's own former campaign lawyer,
Joseph,
was it DiGenova?
Apparently was furious about the release of his
personal data.
It says, quote, I intend to sue the
National Archives. He told USA Today. It says,
quote, they violated the privacy act. Excuse me.
That hiccup.
You can read it for yourself. Include it.
He's literally speaking on on the record
and says, a former church committee staffer also
slammed Trump. Your administration doxxed former public servants
who staffed nineteen nine seven nineteen seventy
nine
congressional investigation by revealing their Social Security numbers.
Many are still alive.
Completely unnecessary because even if they were dead,
it wouldn't be necessary
and contributed nothing to the JFK assassination's
understanding.
Government accountability
lawyer Mark Zaid wrote on x, a a
I trust you will provide them free credit
monitoring. Right? The federal government and its agencies
are barred from sharing personal records. Of course,
there's not gonna be any accountability for that.
They do whatever they want right now. By
the way, so do most administrations, but this
has been especially obvious lately.
The bottom line is, I don't this I
mean, if this was a clumsy accident, that's
really embarrassing, and it does kinda line up
with what I think of these people, all
of them, Biden included, left and right. My
point though is that it feels like there's
something more to this.
Maybe we'll see it see it flush out.
Maybe it's distract us from the Social Security
conversation that's happening. I don't know. But that's
wild. Now ask yourself while they're all screaming
about doxxing in many cases where it doesn't
even actually apply like the Doge employees, they're
literally doxing people, maybe by accident. I just
find them to be insanely stupid.
Now
found this really interesting video, by the way.
Check out these weird little animals.
The podcast you're gonna have to look for
yourself.
Some new species, I guess.
Or it's an AI video. You know?
One of these games that are being played
today, which is what it is. Now it
this is an artificial
intelligence
created video of something creepy and weird looking.
Now there, I just wanna include it because
I thought it was wild, and I think
it's very interesting to see how almost impossible
to tell these things are becoming.
K? That is I think this is where
we're going in the world. Now,
what what I think is really important
is how long we've been talking about
deep fakes
and where this kind of goes.
I mean, obviously, the point is we're well
beyond that. We're in that age, and we
that's why I keep saying,
how has the other shoe not dropped? How
have we not seen some major example? I
think we just got one of the earliest
very big potential examples. Even though it's not
very consequential in the in the political sense
other than embarrassing,
It's interesting that it's came out about JD
Vance and Elon Musk right at this interesting
time. This is just weird. It's a very
weird video about these creepy, all good things.
My point is this could be done by
somebody with influence, and nobody would question it.
If especially if it wasn't this wild, if
it was something pretty much in line with
what's happening, but they faked it. I mean,
I that's probably already happened that we don't
even know.
Like, we're in that time frame right now.
Okay? Even weirdly enough, just on a side
note, Elon Musk just put out a thing
kind of referencing the the grok image editor
and and kinda made a joke about Stalin
and the editing of the picture out. Even
though, you know, the point is, like, look
at what Grok can do, and he posted
the Stalin picture where they took the guy
out even though that's an old image from
Stalin who did that well before the other
technology.
I just thought that was, you know, joke
or not, it's kind of an interesting, you
know, precursor, kind of a what do they
call it in in writing?
You know, like it's symbolic of what's to
come, you know, foreshadowing.
That that's I I think we're coming to
a point where we're gonna start to see
a waterfall of stuff like this. Now here's
why I brought this up for in for
the for the for the real reason.
I don't know whether this is real or
not.
Now my point is not that we know
it's real, but rather that this is where
we get these interesting debates where
if this is real, you're getting pushback from
people on his side that claiming it's fake.
Right? But if it's fake, you're also getting
people claiming that they can prove that it's
real. And so it come it becomes this
partisan forever divide.
I think it's really interesting.
So Christopher Webb says leaked audio of JD
Vance in a jealous rant.
Well, and so but that doesn't matter what
because we don't know for sure. We'll let
you listen to it. And you could tell
me what you think, and then we'll show
you the back and forth of the debate.
And oh, I'm sorry. It get this very
weird and loud feedback.
So I won't I won't cut I won't
stop. You can turn it up, turn it
down, whatever you want. I'll wait for it
to stop, and then I'll jump in. But
what he basically does go on to say
is that, you know, Elon wasn't elected. I
was elected, and Elon's making us all look
bad, that kind of thing. So here it
goes.
That he's doing
is getting criticized in media,
and he says that he's helping, and he's
not he's making us look bad. He's making
me
look bad.
If he wants to tank the economy and
his cars, maybe that's what he deserves. Right?
He's from South Africa cosplaying as an American.
It's a very interesting conversation.
And the way that it's done, it very
well could be real. Like, it's not too
bombastic. It relates to very clear things that
are happening, but it also could be manufactured
to make them look stupid, which they're I
think they're doing well enough on their own,
personally. All sides are, but interesting, though. Okay?
So here, back to the conversation,
this person simply says, it's AI manipulated, and
Vance's communication director confirmed this. Now I haven't
seen that. I looked. I didn't see that.
But they reference this.
This guy is the one she's pointing to,
and he says, this audio is a hundred
percent fake and most certainly not the vice
president and links to a thing that's now
been deleted. So that kinda makes you feel
the other direction. Maybe he got tricked. Who
knows? The the other part is interesting is
this person oh, and this was the guy
that posted it and then deleted it. You
can check for yourself. Maybe there's an update.
Just make sure I miss anything.
So here
is the other one. Now I looked into
this myself. This person simply post his results
that says it's real from one of these
AI detect audio. Right? Now I tried to
do it on free ones, and I got
mixed results. It's good. It's real. It's fake.
It's real. It's fake. Sort of like you
get with those images. So I didn't even
think it's worthy of bringing up.
My my point on this is it's not
this point is not about whether this is
real. Because frankly, I I find it pretty
inconsequential whether he's a petty person arguing about
Elon. You don't need them and their their
petty and disagreements to influence your opinion on
these people. Their actions should be enough. That's
all that really matters. The point though is
we know this is coming.
If this is real, there'll be people that
will defend their death that it was fake
in order for political reasons. If it's fake,
there will be people that will argue forever
that it was real because they want to
believe that about them. This is what they've
created with this partisan divide. And this this
is the problem in this country, largely.
I think that's fascinating and terrifying at the
same time because we're already seeing this and
probably have already seen it, and we didn't
even know.
It's very interesting.
Now on that note, in general, about the
technological direction. Okay? A lot of this is
going I mean, I think in a way,
this could lead to this conversation where they
say, we need to verify who's posting what
and who you are. Otherwise, these this is
gonna get out of control. Like, wait until
somebody posts some, like, very, very damaging video
of the president or something like that.
How long until they roll that into? Well,
we can't allow that anymore. I mean, Trump
right now is making an issue, which I
didn't even I'm not gonna get into, about
some painting that actually doesn't even look that
bad. It's like a painting about him that
very that almost looks I I'd argue it's
one of the it makes him look better
than he looks. And he's, like, screaming about
taking the painting down, and I'm gonna it's
just so petty. My point is
you can see that very clearly going on
where somebody puts a deep fake out about
Trump, and all of a sudden it becomes,
well, we need to verify everybody everywhere online
because we can't allow this. Or maybe it's
some kind of major false flag event that
rolls in the same thing. So you can
see where this might be building. So let's
talk about digital IDs for a second. We
talked about the idea
when they were pushing the re the the
save act,
which was a flimsy overlap for trying to
roll in digital IDs.
July 9, the save act, real ID, and
ID 2020
using the two party illusion and the election
to usher in digital IDs.
Now it didn't necessarily work, but they're still
building. Every one of these moments has been
a building block, and they're still going forward
with it. Still going with the biometric direction.
They're still talking about all of these things.
So my point at the time was you
had the Save Act, which was only part
of it. It very clearly outlined
real ID compliant identification, which, by the way,
that's digital ID. I've made this point in
this show, and I'll briefly go over it
again.
And but there were other options. Right? As
I mentioned, even this part coming up, a
passport, for example.
Okay.
My point was when this combines with the
other side of the conversation or whatever they
decide to roll out next, where they create
a situation where we now in a different
conversation, we make it where you're only able
now to use
digital die digital aspects for this and for
that.
So then in those context, well, you you
can't use that password in digital versions. Okay.
Then you well, you still have this version,
real ID aspect.
And, eventually, they go, well, this is needed
for this in security, and so we'll just
x out the rest of it. So even
though the Save Act still says you can
use these two things, a larger bill says
we can't use those in any context, so
suddenly, all you're able to use is Real
ID compliant.
It's actually very simple. And that's how they
point to the other side and say, you're
responsible. You're responsible. And it doesn't matter because
they both rolled it out.
Watch this show. I think it's really crazy
how obvious this is. So here's one post
from November 2020 to show you two things,
where this is going and how this is
a rollover from both administrations.
Right? Because this was being done during Trump's
administration. It was picked up and carried through
Biden's administration, and now it is continuing in
Trump's administration.
Author of US digital ID bill discusses central
role of biometrics in ID twenty twenty webinar.
So the ID twenty twenty aspect is the
larger conversation. This goes back to something we
talked about over COVID nineteen even before.
ID twenty twenty defector speaks on, quote, what
they call techno solutionism
with immunity passports and the vaccine deception. She
literally resigned from ID twenty twenty because they
she said they were literally using this to
roll out digital ID and some kind of
techno solutionism and and all sorts of other
things. The point about that is to recognize
that is digital ID in a lot of
others, and the real ID aspect is another
aspect of that same web. And we've made
that very clear in previous shows. Now it
says when they are finally established,
US digital IDs will likely be based on
smartphones and biometrics
according to Bill Foster,
US Congressman, the author of the Improving Digital
Identity Act,
which was 2020, I think, then in 2023,
and, by the way, still active,
which is currently before congress bipartisan
support still to this day. Said this is
he's this is ninety twenty twenty webinar. Now
he says central bank digital assets and digital
currencies will significantly drive digital identity efforts in
the coming years, which are all happening.
Fortunately, Foster says and to be clear, by
the way, central bank doesn't we know the
private side of it is largely what Trump's
leaning into. It's that's the same problem and
way worse.
It says, fortunately, Foster says there are a
number of things congress can do to make
portable, reliable, and secure digital IDs a reality.
Nothing that the treasury department is focused on
the issue,
noting that the treasury department is focusing on
the issue and will likely continue to do
to be so in the next administration.
So that's Trump's side handing out to Biden,
and, yes, they did continue that. Now it
says Foster notes that the he worked with
congress congressman Mike Kelly to remove the ban
on federal funding for a unique federal identifier
through an amendment to the Labor HHS bill.
If the amendment which passed the house unanimously
is passed by senate, it will allow HHS
to move forward on patient ID for Americans,
which Foster says could save tens of thousands
of lives. So what you saw there was
the first element of this in medical field.
So the it's it's this is how it's
always incremental. But it says the ban which
prevented Americans from being identified as the same
patient in medical facilities across the street from
each other for the past twenty five years,
Foster's e Foster says,
at the feet of, oh, so Foster lays
the feet of former congressman Ron Paul.
The point was about your personal
privacy.
Right? The idea being, you know, you and
and what it goes on to say, what
has changed in the politics around that ban,
Foster says, is that the need to end
doctor shopping to address the opioid crisis. You
see how this is always it's one thing
to the next. Whether that was the plan,
they're using something they created, the opioid crisis,
and they've never truly dealt with to argue
that, no. They're only looking for different doctors
because they're shopping around for who can get
drugs for them. You know? Or what 99%
of us do is get a second opinion.
Remember when that used to be the only
logic we understood?
Go ask another doctor
to make sure that this one's not ridiculous.
Today, they call you a conspiracy theorist because
you're supposed to take what the apparatus tells
you because they're all a bunch of mon
monotone followers.
So the you is the argument that you're
just looking for drugs to roll out your
digital aspect and what they say, which removed
the privacy that was created there. Now you're
identified. Now it goes on to say
to, and make clear the weakness in the
system of siloed patient identities. So now what
they're saying is you check-in at the hospital
over here, the hospital across the street gets
all that data.
Now it says biometrics are going to play
a huge role in all of this.
Part of that involves the duplication
of the state driver's licenses through the real
ID system, but more needs to be done.
So just referencing to what we're now being
pushed into to argue that's one step in
this direction.
Very clear. That's 2020 for you. K? Here
is the continuation to 2023.
Oh, no. I'm sorry. This was,
oh, the 2020 bill. Bipartisan house bill targets
improving digital identity verification.
That was 2020,
Trump's administration.
Now the improving digital identity act in general
says the concept of,
oh, oh, wait. No. This was just the
general search for it, and I thought this
was relevant. I was just I was looking
for the act and this came up. The
concept of improving digital identity has evolved significantly
since 2020
with a this is interesting. A notable push
in 2025
towards the adoption of digital identity technologies to
enhance, guess what, guys? Aviation security and operational
efficiency.
God, I just I don't know why this
can't be this obvious to everybody.
Now that's not to say that there's not
obvious issues with aviation.
It's certainly not just woke politics. That's certainly
not the case. There that that plays a
factor in a lot of things. But to
argue that's the it's it's insane how obvious
this all is. We're watching them use something.
In many cases, that was wildly manipulated,
like the fog or the drones or all
these different conversations to argue that it's all
because of the now they roll out the
adoption of digital ID technologies to enhance the
aviation security and efficiency.
One more arm of it, one more leg,
one more faction. It continues to grow until
you turn around and realize you're already in
it and didn't even know.
The International Air Transport Association has called for
the faster adoption of digital identity solutions, including
verifiable credentials and decentralized
identifiers to strengthen document integrity and reduce fraud.
No. No. I thought it was acting. You
see where it goes.
Narrative narrative narrative excuse excuse. All it is
is digital ID in every aspect of your
life.
Now we push back on the main one.
Right? But it's not happening in right in
front of you at this point. Now it's
just in case you wanna do that, in
case you wanna go over here.
The next one is important. It's about traveling
domestically. That's happening today. That's the point about
2025.
Now it says the IATA's
one ID initiative allows passengers to verify their
travel documents before departure and use biometric recognition
to move through the airports,
streamlining the process of ensuring compliance with global
regulations and privacy standards.
Okay. Why exactly is the Trump administration leaning
into global regulations and right now, I thought
it was America First and nationalism and all
the you know? No. It's guys, we're it's
all narrative.
They are continuing the same great reset technocratic
agenda that we saw rolled out during COVID
nineteen, which by the way was also Donald
Trump's administration.
But don't take that from me telling you
it's one side. It's not. It's all of
it.
Digital identity technologies are becoming essential components of
cybersecurity.
Think by the way, think Israel, which is,
the the vast majority of that process right
now, especially since since NGO Group and Parag,
Pegasus.
Donald Trump just leaned into those groups, and
that is one of the most nefarious,
notorious
for spying on you, stealing your data, and
way worse than that. But it says, and
advanced threat tech detection with AI, zero trust
security models, and biometric authentication becoming increasingly important.
Check this out. This is from 2020. It's
back to the techno solutionism. It's very interesting
to see how much of this relates to
what's happening today.
Now this was the overlap to the Real
ID point, though. Right? So
it's all it's scattered. Right? It's the boiling
frog. It's incremental.
Little step here, little step there.
My point with the Real ID point aspect
of it was Biden really pushing his side
of it, which was the mobile driver's licenses.
I mean, brought this up many times. So
here, I just wanna reiterate,
this is still now under Trump's administration coming
out in a different arm.
Mobile driver's licenses or MDLs are digitized versions
of the information on physical driver's licenses and
identification cards and are stored on mobile electric
devices like smartphones. So they they market it
as convenience
until they later go, well, now that's all
we'll take. It's how this goes. The Real
ID Act and regulations prohibit federal agencies, including
TSA, from accepting for Real ID, quote, official
purposes,
MDLs that are not
Real ID compliant.
When Real ID enforcement begins on May 7,
oh, it's coming up. We'll talk about that
next.
Next month or rather, excuse me, the month
after so May 7.
We're about to roll into April. May seventh.
That's when Real ID compliance is enforced in
this country.
Now the mobile driver's license part of this
is interesting because they're now saying, well, you
you can have that, but you also have
to make sure that's real. Now why would
that be? Well, because they're one and the
same. They're two parts of the same conversation.
They have to be intertwined because otherwise it
wouldn't line up. It's about a control structure,
guys.
Now
this is from January first of this year.
New travel requirements for Americans in 2025.
What you need to know.
So think about this from the context of
the great reset and all the different things
Republicans thought they're pushing back on,
now rolling out during Trump's administration.
Taking a spontaneous trip, whether in The United
States or abroad, might be harder for travelers
in 2025,
thanks to new requirements. Now this overlaps with
two things. I only focusing on The US
part of it, but there's also part about
The UK. Apparently, they're making it much, much
more difficult to travel to The UK, which
I think is just about continuing to make
sure that you don't get outside that you're
in a controlled bubble of information.
My opinion.
Starting May 7, every American aged 18 or
older traveling domestically must use
Real ID instead of other driver's licenses or
identification cards at airports.
The Real ID is an updated driver's license
or ID card that meets federal security standards.
So what this is, guys, whether they do
it out of the gate or not, is
when you do that, you get a digital
ID that that's that there in on their
system, which is essentially in a way what's
working today, but that you can read into
this. Go in-depth on this. We've done multiple
shows on this. That's very clearly part of
it. Digital ID and the Real ID are
the same agenda. So what they're doing is
not only rolling out their Real ID new
new
license, which is very trackable,
some some of which they are RFID overlap,
but this is more so about the idea
of
getting you stepping in the direction of the
Real ID compliant digital ID direction. And once
you step into this, which they're forcing us
all, that's not a choice anymore, by May
7, it'll be a easy step next.
Now it says, a spokesperson for the Transportation
Security Administration, you know, the the it's a
security theater that is TSA,
says TSA is working to avoid checkpoint delays
by encouraging all travelers to obtain Real ID
compliant or ID or compliant ID or
another form of acceptable ID before May 7.
It says, while the proposed rule would allow
TSA to consider a phased approach to enforcement,
so they could decide to go, well, we'll
do it slowly. It says TSA fully intends
to begin real ID enforcement on May 7.
Interesting.
So it's the the just basically oh, and
this was important to make sure you understand
the real the limits. I don't wanna scare
anybody here. I believe that's where it's going,
which will be entirely,
which why why wouldn't it be with everything
else they've ever done? But here's what it
says. As of May 7, you will need
a Real ID,
and I'll get into what that exactly is
in a second, or another acceptable form of
identification to board domestic flights
and access certain federal facilities.
However, Real ID is not, at the moment,
required for other means of transportation like driving
or taking trains between states.
But I have to understand that this is
a meet this will
mark my words, my opinion.
Once this goes into effect, it'll be a
short period of time before you then required
to have it to cross state lines.
Why wouldn't it? I mean, it's it's just
the it's the logic of how these things
apply. This is incremental steps. That's what I
believe.
But but just so you know, at the
moment, all this will stop you from flying
any anywhere, essentially, anywhere, domestically,
internationally,
unless you have their real ID. That's a
huge restriction for people that have to travel
for anything. I mean, think about the COVID
nineteen time frame. Right? Where they a lot
most people, I argue, didn't really want the
thing, didn't really believe it, or they knew
it was a fault, but they got pressured
into it. They have to do this for
their job. They have children. They have to
go to school.
That's the majority of people, guys. That's why
it's always been a manipulation.
So this is from March 24, today. Real
ID sparks massive wait times in New Jersey.
Now I actually think it's just like with
COVID where they're kind of falsely putting out
this pressure.
Hurry. Get in line. You might miss it
to get people to rush into something that
nobody wants because that's actually the data. Nobody
wants this right now. The majority of people
aren't doing this. So I think it's funny
that they frame it as like, we're you
better hurry. There's a wait two hours long.
I I it's always how this works. But
it says, residents of the gold the garden
state, New Jersey, in addition to all other
states and five US territories are scurrying to
renew or modify
their identification to be real ID compliant by
May 7.
US travelers are being warned that the Department
of Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Administration,
the two agencies enforcing the new provisions
to get their new IDs if they plan
to board domestic flights,
access certain federal facilities, or, I guess, enter
nuclear facilities, which, sure, we don't often do
that.
But the point is the Department of Homeland
Security,
also TSA and the DHS. This is going
to become a national point.
Travelers who do not present a Real ID
compliant license or acceptable alternative
beginning May 7 will not be permitted through
airport security.
So you can't even get through the basic
level of security if you don't have a
Real ID compliant ID.
Passports remain, for the time being, required for
international travel.
So at the moment, you do still need
the passport to leave the country,
but I think as it also references let
me see.
Make sure I'm not yeah. I gotta get
it referenced down here. Yeah. We'll come back
to it. Oh, wait. No. That's the wrong
one.
No. I guess it's not this one. I've
I'm oh, I'll wait on that. I think
the reference is about whether the passport it's
it's a point already made. That at the
moment, I believe in some cases, there will
be something like a birth certificate, passport, whatever
they'll allow you to use in certain context.
But at some point, as they already told
you, by the way, they're transitioning into digital
everything. So at some point, those will be
no longer valid for whatever reason they justify,
and then you'll be forced into this exact
frame. That's what this is about, guys. It's
not even secret. You can look it up
on their their plans. Their their dot read
through the actual website. They make they tell
you this is where it's all going.
Now it says real ID compliance will be
shown directly on the top portion of Citizens
cards.
That's where you get, like, these little little
circle with the star, things like that. Identified
either by a yellow star, black star, or
a star within a yellow circle, a star
with a black circle, or a yellow bear.
It's ridiculous.
Why would you not just make it the
same? I that's I think there's a reason
for that. I think this is about tracking
purposes and location. You could decide for yourself.
Now it says the February in 02/2005, congress
passed the Real ID Act
at the recommendation
of the nine eleven commission. That's what it
goes back to. This is same old thing.
Patriot Patriot Act forward using their psy ops
to get you in this position to set
standards for the issuance of sources of identification,
such as driver's licenses and identification cards.
The TSA said that as of January 2024,
only approximately 56%
of the driver's licenses in circulation were Real
ID compliant. That's despite them screaming about this
for twenty like, ten, fifteen years now.
In 34 states, less than 60%
of them were compliant, and in 22 states,
less than 40% were compliant. But hurry. There's
no space in line.
But my point is that clearly, guys, this
has been a long thing coming.
Right? From the 09:11 discussion, I mean, it's
all about driving you into this position.
Driver's lies I mean, think about the idea
that why should you even be required to
have to identify yourself? Why are you required
to have to have, in some cases, in
some states, required to carry ID?
I mean, there's gonna be plenty of status
out there. They're gonna scream about why you
have to, why it's necessary, and, you know,
you're gonna cause trouble.
I don't care about any of that. I
care about my personal freedom, and I care
about personal sovereignty. I care about the idea
of liberty.
So the fact that they have ever argued
that you have to have identification in and
of itself is the problem. That was the
early step. We're we're well we're now on
different kinds and how you verify those. But
it says my main the article continues. My
main complaint,
this was
what was her name?
Anna Marie speaking somebody speaking about this in
her experience. My main complaint is that I
paid good money, she says, for a TSA
precheck.
Not all and it says they not only
required my birth certificate,
they fingerprinted me.
When I called Trenton to see if they
would accept that as ID, they didn't even
know what it was.
I think how great that is. There's these
are just grifters, man. The fact I mean,
fingerprints. Like, this is clearly not just about
what's more secure. It's about funneling you into
what they need.
Now so she also wondered why her pre
check won't wouldn't won't work as an ID
for domestic flight travel. Right?
Saying this new process is making more people
like her jump through hoops when previous protocols
worked fine, arguably might even be better.
But see, it's not about your security and
privacy. It's about their ability to find to
influence, control, you know, have a full picture
all the time of where everybody is and
what's happening.
Not for your benefit.
And realize, guys, that already,
like, she's talking about, like, you know, like,
why would you need to go through these
hoops to verify the real ID when you
could you have your ID, your pictures on
it. That's me. Here's my birth
certificate. No. We need more than that. I
mean, it shows you what it's really about.
Those things very clearly prove that's you. They
just want more on file. It's the same
we're dealing with with these platforms. Give us
more biometric data. You don't need that to
verify who you are. They're making it out
to be terrorism
or threat to children, you know, things that
are gonna get you to jump at shadows
so you fall in line. Not even to
say those things aren't real and important. It's
about them using what you care about.
But it say it says I must renew
in person, not online.
Hey. I'm not you could I thought that
was relevant. You know, you go on these
things. You're being I I think there's more
going on about
facial you know, the all these places have
their biometric scans and the facial recognition, and
you stand in their line. They do this
camera scan. So online,
maybe you could try to they manipulate that.
I don't know.
Lastly, it says, enhanced driver's licenses. I found
this interesting. I haven't heard about this. EDL,
only currently issued in Michigan, Minnesota, New York,
Vermont, and Washington, will also be accepted as
official real ID purposes, but will contain no
star markings. ELDs can be identified by having
an image of The US flag or the
word enhanced at the top of the card.
Well, let's let's look at that.
It says enhanced driver's licenses are state issued
documents that confirm your identity and US citizenship,
allowing you to cross the border.
So why would that be the exception?
Well, it says EDLs contain radio frequency identification
chips that assist with rapid identification checks at
federal borders. So those two down to know
that they're being used, right, they well, it'll
be more convenient for you. It'll, like, jam
a chip in your arm, you know, obviously,
in your card. My my joke being that,
why would you ever want that to get
a little bit of an inconvenience?
People that don't know what's going on, I
argue, but it says the card use ident
a unique identification
DHS database. Well, now you see why. You
see, that's what they're after. So that one's
okay as one of the only alternatives because
that already has it all in line. We
want you to, you know, jump through one
of these hoops. Right? That's where this is
going.
We all know this.
Oh, by the way, on this conversation point
about identification, I wanted to point this out
because somebody else told me this. And I
I should have done the beginning of the
show quite honestly.
I've had many, many people
reach out to me and say, I tried
to watch this on Rumble,
and I no matter what I did, it
was trying to get me to verify. I
have an they have an account. They're on
Rumble. And as they they go to comment,
it goes, verify what's your phone number.
Take a picture of your face. Like, weird
things on Rumble
to be able to engage with our videos.
I don't think it may maybe it's not
just about me. Maybe. Who knows?
But why?
You already have an account. You're already on
the platform. I think you all know why,
guys. If you especially recognize that Rumble, despite
the effort and the claims and the framing
and the marketing,
is exactly like YouTube. I don't mean in
the sense of content or what they're doing
or what they promote. I'm talking about the
background. It is the same mainstream infrastructure, the
same Amazon cloud services, the same everything.
Why would it be any different? I I'm
waiting for that rug to get pulled. I
hope I'm wrong, obviously, but I'm not gonna
lean into that.
That's why we should lean into things like
BitChute, for example, or Odysee. Ones that are
out there that are I mean, I even
hear I'll leave that off for now. But
the point is both of them actively fighting,
in many cases, to their detriment to allow
absolute free speech.
Anyway, I found that interesting, and this is
what it says when I looked it up.
Rumble requires users to verify their identity before
accessing certain features, which is most platforms.
But down here, it says, additionally,
some users have reported difficulties, that's what I'm
hearing as well, from a lot of people,
with commenting
on live streams even after verifying their accounts.
In such cases, adding a phone number to
account may resolve the issue.
So just recognize where this is going.
That should not be okay with people. There's
no need for any of that.
Now on that point I mentioned earlier, just
as a really quick point,
Trump wants a golden dome
capable of defending the entire United States. Now
the main point or the first point that
I mentioned is, you know,
strategically, logistically, financially, that's it's crazy.
Tens
hundreds of billions of dollars. I mean, there's
there's different reports about what they think. The
point is nobody seems to know.
Basically, I have to have some major part
investigate investigatory,
effort to find out what we'll need. Right
now, they don't seem to know. They're just
going earmark billions for this is what Trump
is really pushing.
And they're saying strategically, it doesn't make any
sense.
US Military Officials are scrambling to develop what
they call a Golden Dome defense system. Basically,
just, as he says, just developing,
akin to Iron Dome for Israel, which, by
the way, the US government funds entirely or
rather you do, as then dumps billions on
top of it for continuing genocide. But that's
you. You fund that and then you they
sell things back to you that you paid
for. Often how that works. But since at
a time the Pentagon is looking to cut
budgets, the Trump administration has ordered military officials
to ensure future funding for the Golden Dome.
So one more billion multi billion dollar project
as we pretend we're cutting costs It's reflected
as a new budget estimates all the way
to 2030.
Always with this time frame, guys. Something's going
on, and we all know it. But the
system itself remains undef undefined beyond a name.
Now it says likely cost billions of dollars
to construct, but much more than that when
you listen to some of the more educated
estimates.
Trump has repeatedly insisted The US needs a
missile defense program
similar to Israel's Iron Dome.
That comes from Israel. It says the the
the the whole conversation, but the systems are
orders of magnitude apart.
I Israel's Iron Dome missile defense system selectively
protects, if you even believe that. I mean,
quite frankly, I think it's all an illusion.
Not that they don't have things, but there's
it's it's
either it doesn't work properly, which we've even
seen, or they ended up accidentally or maybe
on purpose, blowing a bunch of children playing
soccer, and they blamed it on the other
group. That was very clearly a Iron Dome
missile. We have a video of it. The
point here,
or rather in the general sense is, you
know, rocket lands in a field and, you
know, they they there's a narrative that spun
up every time. Things fly in the air.
There's no evidence another shot. It's it's about
creating the illusion that things are happening. Not
every single time, but I've proven this over
the years.
And and then we've even shown when they
get real attacks, those things don't seem to
be able to stop anything.
So I think there's worth asking whether there's
a larger kind of money laundering illusion around
all this anyway, especially when he's gonna build
one a hundred times the size of what
they have.
But it says he wants to build a
space based missile defense system capable defending the
entire United States from advanced missiles.
For it says, for one thing, Israel was
tiny. The the source familiar with the ongoing
internal discussions about the Golden Dome said, it's
a % feasible to blanket Israel in things
like radars,
combination of mobile and fixed interceptors.
Right? Quote, how are you going to do
that in The United States? It's a good
question.
He says, you can't do it at just
the borders and the shoreline
because in inter intercontinental ballistic missiles, they can
reenter the atmosphere over Kansas.
He says still Trump issued an executive order
during his first week in office ordering HEGSETH
to submit a plan for developing and implementing
the next generation missile defense shield by March
28.
That's four days away.
Down here, it says such a system would
require
thousands of interceptors in low Earth orbit. So
think back to Elon Musk and his
system they're building.
To intercept even a single single North Korean
missile or any missile, it argues, according to
the reports which had studied the feasibility of
the ballistic missile defense for years. A single
interceptor in orbit is almost never at the
right place and time to rapidly intercept the
ballistic missile launch, so you need exponentially more
to ensure adequate coverage.
So my question becomes, is that even what
this is about?
Is this another this is a rationale to
roll out one of the most invasive security
systems and surveillance apparatus that we've ever seen?
It says, we estimate that a cons consolation
of about 16,000 interceptors would be needed to
attempt a counter
to attempt to counter
a rapid salvo of 10 solid propellant I
b I c ICBMs.
10. 16 thousand just the interceptors just to
stop 10. He says in the Red Sea,
The US has fired scores of multimillion dollar
interceptor missiles at Houthi drones and missiles that
cost a fraction of the price. The fiscal
imbalance gets far worse when his system is
in space according to John Tierney. Okay. Remember
what
Massey just said? Well, we need to supply
find another location for the $50,000,000,000
in war spending. Right? Well, Yemen seems to
be starting that. And what he's saying is
we're spending billions to knock down things worth
a hundred dollars.
And it says a former Democratic congressman who
held year, years of,
in hearings on these missiles spoke up about
this and says it's a joke. It's basically
a scam.
He says now the executive director at the
Center for Arms Control and Nonproliferation,
that's him, says
he ripped Trump for being, quote, willing to
throw billions and billions and billions of dollars
at something that won't work. Now whether it
does or not, there's two things, obviously.
You're gonna be spending an an
obscene amount of money
for something that might or might not work
like a lot of the jet programs we
work on.
But overall,
you're gonna need to build out a massive
system of of surveillance
and and interceptors and and like, and by
the way, things that are going to have
radiation,
energy
all over this country.
Five g and everything else. I mean, guys,
this is not what we want. Not what
most people, not in either side. Maha is
all about stopping a lot of this stuff.
To me, it's about all those things together.
And on top of that, recognizing that Israel
is immersed in all of this conversation, whether
it's all the things we've already talked about
or not or Trump himself.
And it's an iron dome overlap, which probably
means that Israel will be involved with this,
And this is gonna be something built around
everything.
There's so many examples of where this all
goes. And even or how about even just
the last one about whether we wanna spend
all the money on this when it's something
that is on on, you know,
arguably questionable
in Israel?
And is that in the interest of Americans
want right now spending more money?
Now on the Tesla point about this, which
is very important because I think this is
not not the Tesla conversation itself, but how
this ties into the
great reset direction
Like, just the electric vehicle point or rather
more importantly, the self driving car discussion.
Well, as we discussed recently,
weirdly timed around all this, Tesla recalls most
cyber trucks due to the trim detaching from
the vehicle, which was causing accidents, blah blah
blah. And this is March 20, understand. But
there's already been a very clear collapse in
the Tesla stock price. There this company seems
to be struggling, whether it's politically motivated or
not, well before this big push to go
after domestic terrorists, which I think is obviously
about something else.
But so you understand it. This is wild
to me. Tesla is recalling nearly all the
Cybertrucks in the country.
And if you didn't know this, this is
currently the eighth eight.
Ten minus two. Eight. Eight recalls
just since 2024.
What car company could exist with that? That's
being subsidized. This is not about selling cars.
It can't be.
The recalled vehicles represent a vast majority of
all the Cybertrucks
on the road.
Demand for the,
the unconventional electric vehicle, the pickup, the Cybertruck
is what it is, had already weakened toward
the end of the last year,
following several delays. The car sales are a
fraction of Tesla's overall shipments, which in 2024
came to $1,790,000.
That's it.
In 2024,
Tesla topped the list for the for US
recalls.
All of Tesla, not just the Cybertruck, all
of it, with its vehicles accounting for 5,100,000
callbacks.
I mean, we talked about this for years.
Well, before Elon Musk in the White House,
the idea of these cars just crashing all
over the place.
Every other day, I was seeing one of
these, and nobody said a word about that.
They never got I mean, they recalled like
small things, but not pulling them off the
market entirely even though that's wildly because there's
Elon Musk is a contractor for the government,
guys. This is about, I think, personally, about
mapping these things out. Right? Getting to the
point where these cars will driverless cars will
become the norm. That's the great reset. That's
what they wanted.
Now, we forget that because Elon Musk makes
it into a cyber. I mean, it's wild
how obvious this is. Jumping edge slightly,
I thought this was hilarious.
I just saw this this I thought this
morning. And I said, and just like that,
Republicans now support electric vehicles.
But just the right ones, though,
they're laughing at you.
This ridiculous gift was so perfect. This guy
rolls up, dresses Washington, George Washington with American
flag, and it says, America with a Cybertruck.
Maybe it broke down. The point is clearly
how you
Republicans were largely pushing back on that, which
I'll make show you more in a second.
And that's why most of the Democrats are
the ones that own these cars, both of
them.
And then
they started pushing back on Elon because he
was politically motivated.
And then they motivated all the Republican side
to jump up and go, Tesla is America.
And all of just like that, you're supporting
the great reset direction like everything else is
happening.
We'll come back to this.
Now
Rodney, to the point about spying on you,
pointed this out. Thank you. He says hashtag
Palestine will be free. Of course, for that,
they probably called it racist.
This is fascinating
and I think very important.
Now this is what he wrote, and I'll
show you where he gets it from and
then directly to the actual Tesla
Cybertruck
forum where they're discussing these things. That's where
it comes from. He says a a Tesla
Cybertruck owner says he's blowing past
his 1.28
terabyte data
data cap
after buying a truck. Think think think of,
like, your phone or whatever else. Like, why
you have they they have to pay for
that. You have to pay for data for
a car.
Why would you want that? It's like because
it's a it's a new toy. Right? That's
like average people, one pro can't afford something
like that, especially if they can't afford a
car. Let alone the idea that why would
you need why wouldn't I mean, the obvious
point is if there's data, that means there's
an exchange of information.
Now it says,
the Internet spikes coincided with Cybertruck updates.
And he goes, I'm trying to understand how
my Cybertruck
uses so much data. I've never come close
to using the 1.28
terabyte data, which is a lot,
cap on my plan.
But since getting my truck in November,
I've gone over two of the three billing
cycles.
As as to his surprise, Ben reports that
he checked his data usage, and lo and
behold, the Cybertruck transmitted
940
gigabytes. That's almost the entire that's so a
thousand, I believe, is is one terabyte
of data in just one month.
He continued to write. I looked at my
Internet traffic and which client was using what
over the last thirty days, and I was
shocked to see 940
gigabytes of data usage from my Cybertruck.
So what do you think that is? It's
not hard to recognize, guys. That's all the
information. That's where you're going, what you're doing,
how you drive. It's all the data. They're
dumping back everything. That's not even a secret.
I'll show you
next. Why would you want that?
And how do you not how is that
alarming for the very people that were screaming
about that, rightly so, thirty seconds ago?
It's because a lot of the conversation, largely
the ones with the voices to say something
to make it known, are being used, are
being played, they're being gaslit,
or they're caught up in the Elon saving
the world golden age nonsense, and they've lost
touch with reality.
Thank you, Rodney, for posting this out pointing
this out. So Torque News is the one
that reported this. It comes directly from the
Cybertruck
back and forth, as you can see. I'm
trying to understand how my Cybertruck used so
much data. And you can see it says
and and this is what's important. It actually
goes through you post the the images,
engages, you know, the verification process and everything
in this. You know, it's going on to
it goes back and forth. You can read
it for yourself. It's all right here. It's
exactly what we just read to you. The
article go does the same thing. Tesla truck
owner says he's blowing past his data. That's
really the only point. This one I go
next to showing you very clear evidence of
this. This is showing you what he said
right there. I'm trying to understand how my
cyber truck uses so much data.
And then is this a some I I
did wanna show show you this too. So
if these are relevant to you, you can
look and see the actual spikes in data,
the time of it. This is in comparison
to the data usage for my wife's model,
same time frame.
Lot less. Interesting.
So this guy says,
oh,
he's he's arguing to turn it off. I
I find that hard to believe because I'm
curious why there's so much HTTP traffic.
Each one, eight to nine gigabytes and these
updates. I mean, they go you go read
those for yourself. It's it's fascinating. Now, here's
what's important. Knowing that this is exchanging almost
a terabyte of data from this guy.
First,
let's not forget. That's why I use this
picture today.
This all weirdly started
with the psychological operation.
I don't know how we forgot that. Right?
So we've got a cyber truck that blew
up out front of Trump Tower.
What did the right do? Muslims, terrorists. Oh,
except they were both from Fort Bragg. That's
right.
That's what that was the that was the
story, in case you forgot.
You mean Fort Bragg, which is rife with
previous psychological operations?
Insane.
And this got kind of kicked aside. We
there's a few reports about certain things, and
everyone just rushed into the next topic.
Wild.
And then all of a sudden, we start
seeing this weird Cybertruck push?
I mean, come on.
And I the title was fifth generation warfare,
drones, fog, false flags, and political destabilization.
Look at how prescient that was. Look at
where we are.
Now this is just a random search, and
I'll show you directly from security week. And
this is all very easy to see.
Tesla privacy concerns. Tesla's vehicles are equipped with
an array of sensors because they arguably have
to to be able to do the self
driving thing. Right? But those are sensors outward
and inward looking at you.
And cameras that collect a wide range of
data, including vehicle location information, video recordings.
Why?
Now it says despite Tesla's claims that camera
recordings remain anonymous and are not linked to
you or your vehicle, then why do they
need them?
Here's the important part. Former employees have alleged
that these videos were shared among Tesla employees,
potentially compromising your privacy.
Now think about this. These are the kind
of people he's working around him
in Doge.
These 20 something people, you know, this is
the same kind of Greek grouping of people.
People that would laugh about you behind the
scenes because they think they can. Same people
that have read and write access and $6,000,000,000,000
databases,
who we've already been proven are using your
personal data to train their AI models. That
came from congress.
Just think about how crazy that is,
that they're laughing about your private videos. But
it says Tesla's privacy policy states that most
data processing occurs
locally within the vehicle, and personally identifiable camera
recordings are not continuously collected.
However, the company can still collect substantial data
about you and your car usage. And the
point going back to the show the
Cybertruck blowing up front Trump Tower, do you
remember how that played out? I'll reference in
the next article.
Elon Musk was able to unlock the car.
He was able to get all the data.
He were able to use the videos.
Now sure, you could argue that was an
extreme circumstance. The only thing it showed you
is that they can if they want to.
That's all that matters.
Privacy advocates have raised concerns about the potential
for unauthorized surveillance through extensive video data collection,
noting incidents where Tesla employees shared sensitive customer
data between themselves.
These are all linked to I always include
these. The link you they're
look at the look, all these articles are
talking about it.
Here's Wired.
Your Tesla is watching.
I mean, this is not a joke. This
is very easily proven. They're just arguing it's
all that it's all for personal safety.
How often has that been the case in
historical in your in your experience?
But you know Elon's the good guy. Right?
So that's why it's okay.
Do you know that, or is that your
opinion?
Tesla's data collection practices have also been scrutinized
in the context of the Las Vegas Cybertruck
explosion,
where
the company shared
detailed data with law enforcement.
Okay. Right there. It's like the Amazon Echo.
Why would you want that? If you know
that should they decide to, you know, because
national security or because law enforcement, they could
just take your personal data they swear would
never be used and give it to the
law enforcement. That happens so many times with
Amazon.
Personal disputes amongst spouses, hus I mean, it's
incredible. He showed you right there that should
they want to, they can access it. Simple.
Highlighting the ethical question of whether car companies
are violating customers' privacy rights.
In summary, while Tesla claims to protect user
data, there are valid concerns about the extent
of data collected and the potential for misuse
as evidenced by allegations from former employees and
scrutiny over data sharing practices or, you know,
shot in the dark maybe because he's being
influenced by a very genocide committing foreign government
that has interest in attacking Americans that are
calling them out, and he's absolutely facilitating that
right through his own platform. But let's not
pretend like he will use other source of
data for the same thing.
A lot this one is
security week. This is from January sixth of
this year. Is your kite car spying on
you?
It says, what it means that Tesla shared
data in the Las Vegas explosion? Now, really,
we already went over this. The point is
simply that your car is spying on you,
and that they very clearly admitted that when
they ended up the the only point I
wanna add to this that I'm glad I
did this because it reminded me of this.
Matthew Livers Liversburg or Liversburger, right, was the
person.
Do you remember that this person was what
they claimed sent an email to Sean Ryan?
Now and we went on to point out
that podcast where they were pointing to the
emails and turned out they faked the email.
I mean, there's so much this overlaps. We
are this is an ongoing operation. How we
don't see that by now.
The Sean Ryan podcast at this point should
be very clearly seen as the CIA facilitation,
as him being former and bringing on different
people that sold you all these narratives right
before this, the drone, the fog about sniffing
for nuclear weapons.
Yeah. Where'd that go?
Jones pulled the same card.
Why do people keep listening to them? I
don't know.
It's spying on you. Okay? And then again,
and just like that, Republicans now support electric
vehicles.
Why? Because America,
freedom, and liberty as they literally say sell
all those things away from you.
It's right in front of us. Now SeeCentered
News points out
right when Trump stepped in
and said it's a I'm gonna buy a
Tesla. It's a great product, which was so
incredibly weird and cringey that the president of
The United States has stepped out and basically
hawk a Tesla at you. Why? Because at
that exact moment, the price had completely tanked.
Not hard to see the overlap here, guys.
That's what they're doing.
This person
points out something else that's very relevant. Here's
Ted Cruz,
January twenty fourth.
More than a hundred Republicans sign on to
oppose Biden de facto EV mandate.
Electric vehicles are are, quote, not a practical
option for most Americans.
Colin,
Allard voted to support the Biden Harris EPA
mandate that would force two thirds of all
vehicles to be electric by 2032. This position
is radically out of touch with Texans and,
you know, same thing. Now, yes, that doesn't
say nobody should use them. The point though
is that you can see, go back and
look, historically,
a lot of pushback because that was usually
what Republicans were doing. Here he is. Since
the whole Tesla scam,
this may be the coolest thing I've ever
seen,
Tesla.
Why are we having politicians
Go get the thing. Alex
Jones saying, this is America.
I mean, shouldn't as the any
remotely honest conservative with brain cells to go,
that feels weird.
That doesn't feel right.
I mean, Tesla isn't America, clearly, as this
South African running a company that wasn't created
by him from other people that weren't. I
mean, clearly not America. But let's just pretend
it's all American folk. The point is this
is strange.
This is
conflicts of interest,
especially if there's other things going on, if
this is some kind of, you know, Department
of Homeland, Department of Defense
contractor project or something different.
Its main point is hypocrisy.
Poncho says, and the ones on the left
who were all about electric vehicles are now
attacking them. It's the other side of the
point, which is hilariously stupid. Right? How dumb
is that? So now they've effectively so that's
why we always point out how dumb the
part in the Russian I mean, I don't
wanna always insult them. How how the partisan
sides are
played, which is
the one that we're now going EVs, everything,
or are now going after EVs, specifically Teslas,
which were the primary one that was used.
And now you got the ones fighting that,
now going buy them, buy them.
It's just hilariously stupid, isn't it? It goes,
the far right is just as gullible as
the brainwashed far left. Exactly. Because they're the
same thing. Woke right, woke left. Well,
night watch Nate says,
first Trump turned the White House into a
Tesla commercial. Now Alex Jones turned into a
Tesla car salesman raffling off his own very
Alex Jones edition Cybertruck.
It's weird. I mean, let's be real, guys.
He's done does not need your money. Elon
Musk is not in danger of going bank
robbery. The guy is if if we are
to believe he's the richest man in the
world,
even when he lost a hundred and $50,000,000,000,
he was still one of the richest people
in the world. The guy is not stressed
for money. Okay? So it's insane to think
that you need to somehow support Elon Musk.
This is not about supporting Elon Musk. How
do you not see that? It says all
of these attacks on Tesla dealerships are a
marketing campaign for Elon's failing company. Now it
could just be that. It could just be
him not wanting to have his company fail.
It's it's Occam's razor. Right? But overall, I
think there's more to it.
Yeah. Here he is. We already that one
I put that actually
let me grab that real quick.
I think this is it. Yeah. This is
the video right there where he just stands
in front of his Tesla or his Cybertruck
and just goes off about there's little clips
in it too, but the whole thing is
him basically standing in front of the truck,
just talking about how this is important. And
here's what it says. Standing up for Musk
and Tesla is standing up for America. He's
done that more than once now.
I just said, I don't understand why honest
people fall for this. No. It's not standing
up for America.
Now that's one point. Clearly, that does not
make sense. Now I argue more than that.
It says it is standing up for an
Israeli purchased oligarch, in my opinion. I think
it's obvious, but my opinion, who is rolling
out the exact same great reset Alex was
just pretending to fight. Even if you don't
believe the Israel side of this, realize that
that's exactly what they're doing. I'll play the
clip again in a second.
So if you are fighting those things, why
are you sup why why is supporting the
guy doing that supporting America? Well, that only
makes sense if you're all on the same
side.
I'll include this for
you.
Now here was the post of just wanna
show you. Here's the out Donald Trump, like,
literally selling a Tesla on front of the
White House. And Alex Jones says, breaking exclusive,
which totally wasn't. Learn why Trump's domestic terrorist
designation of Democrat gangs,
even though nobody's proven that everyone involves a
Democrat or that it's necessarily even a left
right paradigm thing. Personally, I think it's obvious
that these dark funding aspects are usually bigger
than just left and right, but it says
attacking Tesla dealerships and owners is massive game
changer.
Silly.
Well, here is the other one. This is
from the nineteenth.
If Tesla dies, America dies.
Like, it's just it's just it's just simply
not true. That's stupid. Now you can argue,
Tesla, we should support because Elon Musk is
who I believe in, but that's just in
that's they they're they think you're that stupid.
They're they're trying to emotionally manipulate you because
of your your love of this country to
believe that Tesla is America. And if they
fail, then America fails.
You that that is worthy of ridicule. That's
insanely stupid.
Alex Jones also post this. Trump pledges to
end now this is from 11/13/2024.
Trump pledges to end electric car subsidies and
promote The US auto industry back to the
world. Oh,
Oh, I guess we went I guess we
pivoted. Now we're going back to EVs. I
just wanna show you the interesting hypocrisy of
or rather just the, you know, go along,
you know, the, what do you call it?
The fair weather reporter as it is Al
Jones. Whatever they're saying thing. The new, I
support the current thing on the right.
Here he is on April 17 saying Germany
announces plan to ban private car ownership. Well,
gee, Alex, where do you think the self
try this the driverless car goes? Weren't you
the weren't you the one pointing that out?
That driverless cars were gonna lead to the
great reset where they you owe nothing and
you and and you're happy? You were pointing
that out. Funny how you're no longer saying
that today as you're supporting electric vehicles, specifically
driverless electric vehicles.
Well, this one is from 01/28/2024.
It's already federal law. It says that all
new cars have kill switches that track you
every or every move. You mean like a
Cybertruck, Alex?
California is just throwing it in our face.
Oh, because it's only the Democrats. Right? We
need to stop the technocratic prison planet takeover.
Yeah. Unless Elon says otherwise, and then you're
all for it, and you call something else,
though. My point is just this is either
he never meant this or he doesn't realize
he's being played right now, which I find
really hard to believe.
He also says this. Elon Musk posted on
the December 24. Tesla,
the self driving aspect has gotten so good.
I basically stopped driving, this guy says. I
just don't know what to do with my
hands now.
That's where it's going.
Elon Musk goes, yay, emoji.
Al Jones says, I like driving.
I don't want a respirator to breathe either.
I'm not against technological innovation, but I'm very
concerned about what the globalist technocracy, you know,
what he's currently supporting, will do once these
technologies are widespread and accepted. Yeah. It's exactly
my point, bud. We need to develop and
deploy technology that empowers and enhances our inherent
human traits.
Well, funny how law how funny what changes
a year makes. Right? Now we're all pro
everything else because Elon said so.
Well, I'll include
Derek's outstanding article, Doge. Is efficiency a gateway
to technocracy?
Answer is yes. It's very clearly where this
is going, and he is rolling out the
same old plan that even goes back to
his grandfather. It's very clear. Technocracy
Inc.
I'll play this again since it's relevant. I
just simply said Elon checks all the boxes.
Nobody
will be safe
if not everybody is vaccinated.
Are you vaccinated, if I can? Yes. Yeah.
Yeah. I mean, I'm very pro vaccination. I
mean, we've, it's the science is unequivocal. Can
you imagine, sir, that in ten years when
we are sitting here, we have an implant
in our brains,
and,
I can immediately feel because you all will
have implants. Just think of sensors
planted into our brains. Basically implanted in your
skull. So,
but it would be
flush with your skull. So you basically,
take out a chunk of skull, replace put
put the neurolink device in there.
You you put the the electrode you'd insert
the electrode threads very carefully into the the
brain. It doesn't change what you are doing.
It changes you if you take a genetic
editing. It's a fusion of
the physical, the digital,
and the biological
world.
That's
really
the essence
of the fourth industrial revolution. A merger with
biological intelligence
and machine intelligence. An effort for man to
merge with machine in a healthy way. Yes.
To beat machines, you basically have to merge
with machines. Most likely, yes. As work is
changing, is a universal basic income,
really a a a solution to the to
this problem? I I think, ultimately, we will
have to have some kind of universal basic
income. And I think some kind of a
universal basic basic income is gonna be necessary.
Decarbonization
of the economy. Where are they travelling? How
are they travelling? What are they eating? What
are they consuming on the platform?
So individual carbon footprint tracker.
Stay tuned. We don't have it operational yet,
but this is something that we're working on.
I mean, my top recommendation, honestly, would be
just to have a carbon tax. Cisco release
it
is necessary. Yeah. They clearly think that.
Well, to reiterate, I had to include this
because my god, this is insane. And and
and as far as I can tell, this
is not a parody. I'm not even gonna
play it all. I can't stomach it again.
But I included it with this. And, yes,
I've showed it probably four times there. I
really just think this is such a profoundly
on the nose
outline. I'm not gonna read it all again,
but this was the what Free Prince posted
about having blind faith in regard to Cat
Turd saying, I have a % full faith
in Cash Patel and Dan Bongino.
I'll just read the first part. He's saying
there's no more dangerous sentence in the modern
world than I have a % full faith
in insert name here.
Not faith in an idea,
not trust in principles, not but faith. Blind,
uncritical, unwavering in another human being, a stranger,
a politician, a government official, an agent of
the machine.
This is the problem. The fundamental sickness. People
do not want to think. They do not
want to want to wrestle with complexity, with
uncertainty, with contradiction. They want a figurehead, a
banner to march behind, a team to pledge
loyalty to. They want to delegate their own
minds. Please read the rest of it. I've
read it many times. It's very spot on.
The point the reason I'm pointing out today
is this video.
We thank you Elon Musk is what it's
called.
And I said this kind of political hero
worship is one of the most dangerous and
naive parts of this country's most radically partisan
groups. They are quite literally together
destroying this country while pointing at each other
as the sole cause.
And my point in saying all of this
is because this kind of clip is what
it looks like to have blind hero worship
faith in somebody you don't know, who's somebody
who is in a position of political power,
and somebody who even if they have the
best of intentions, because of that position should
be held to more account than anybody.
Should be more critically you should be more
critical of them than anybody because you believe
in them, but the opposite of what happens
today.
And it's because of hero worship like this.
He gave us cars that drive so fast,
made rockets
built to blast.
Oh, thank you Elon
Musk.
He took over
Twitter's
reign.
He saved free speech for all,
eliminating
woke
pain.
SpaceX's life. Tesla
I think that's a good enough place to
pause.
He's got a master plan for our lives,
guys.
Just go back to sleep. Trust the plan.
It's all gonna work out. Right?
My god.
Of course, for the back of a Tesla
Cybertruck. Right? You see, you just gotta you
gotta tap into that that social contagion going
around. Right?
I mean, if you wanna throw up a
little bit in your mouth, go ahead and
watch the rest of it. It's insane. It
it it goes on to be the same
thing. And it's all just Elon's great, and
he's the best, and he saves us from
everything, and he knows everything.
It's just insane. I mean, how in the
world can you think I mean, you know
what? Let's just even say it's one of
two things.
Blind hero worship or somebody who is
business savvy enough to know that she'll trick
a lot of mindless people into going, yeah,
and make a lot of money off it,
which either way, I think is disgusting, but
I think that's crazy.
And, again,
this is hero worship, and it is the
worst problem in this country.
And this person simply posts out the same
thing and says it's a cult. A master
plan for our lives.
Why Why does that what anybody would even
promote? Why do you want that? I mean,
my god. Because we have been turned into
children. The partisan field and far too many
that fall in line with it are are
are followers.
They they look for a hero like Free
Prince said, and they and they and they
their mind is
hooked to that, you know, what's that what's
that phrase? The
hook your rag into that star or whatever
it is. You know? But you you are
locked in,
and people lose their logic, man. It's it's
it's a terrifying thing. Now
you've seen this going around. I mean, I've
I've saw Tim Poole tweeting about his cyber
truck and how cool and everyone looking at
me funny. It's like, these people are just
so desperate to tap into the thing, whatever.
And just like the old NPC, the current
thing, it's left and right, guys. Every time,
all these things.
But my point is you're seeing all this
all this crazy coverage of breaking news, and
don't forget what we started with. That's what
we're coming to next. Donald Trump is quite
literally telling you these are domestic terrorists. Now
if they committed a crime, well, as always,
we have laws for that
already. Charge them with whatever crime you think
they committed. To turn into domestic terrorism is
a political motivation.
In fact, you could call that itself terrorism
because the action would be violence committed for
political ends. Right? So you could call that
in the sense of one person just vandalizing
a car. My point would be that you
don't know their intentions.
And then, ultimately, one person doing so would
not raise the level of of terrorism because
of one person's actions. But if a government
is ultimately suppressing an entire group of people,
or rather I should say,
inappropriately you're like, basically turning them into terrorists
when when what they have what they're doing
is a crime. Let's be clear first of
all. I've already said it six times over.
I am not in any way supporting all
this dumb stuff that's happening. The takedown Tesla,
that's that's laughably stupid.
What is the point of that? Because you
you're petty and wanna hate Elon well, you
have Elon derangement syndrome. It's the same thing.
Everybody should go, that's really dumb. You should
not be just going after one person's
company, which by the way, employs a lot
of people and has a lot of people
that work there that have nothing to do
with Elon's ridiculous sense.
But that's my point is that they create
this. So they come out with this ridiculous
democrat thing if that's what it really is
at at the core,
and then they come out with the other
side of it. And what that does, it
traps your mind in this ridiculous back and
forth when the truth, the reality, everything else
is right there in the middle somewhere.
So right here, we have another video of
somebody,
you know, vandalizing a car. That's that's like
90% of this. Yes. There's been extreme examples
like we showed out
earlier. Circumcision in Mozambique. Right? That's sounds bombastic
and stupid.
90% of it aren't as crazy, but also
should be stopped even though most of their
they're still continuing it. So So that's my
point. They use
the seven cars burned down in this factory.
Yeah. That's crazy, and somebody should be charged
with a federal crime for that. But the
vast majority are a bunch of Karens scratching
snot wasp swastikas on a car because they're
also trapped by the contagion of the partisan
field on the other side.
But it says cops are looking for an
unhinged Karen
after she was caught on a Tesla
scratching this. And you you see all of
them from Jones to the rest to John
Bennie Johnson and Kim Nick Sorter every day.
Breaking news investigation. Laura Loomer. We caught this
person, and we found this out. And here's
a judge that supports it. It's just it's
just nonsense.
There's relevance in plenty of ways.
But the bigger picture with everything that's going
on just in this country and this is
what you're focusing on, And then, of course,
the real point,
using this to call the domestic terrorist is
the bridge between
the Venezuelan gang conversation, the Khalil conversation, and
your government beginning to come after you, which
is exactly what he says.
And it should not be ignored. This is
not a joke. And, of course, you can
go down the thread about all these different
people. Like, guys, why would you care about
this?
Finder, charge her with a vandalism charge. That's
all it is. You're scratching a car. You're
keying a car. That's a misdemeanor for crying
out loud. And this is what you all
care about? How do you not see that
you are the one being played?
Just a thought, and points out what he
says, and I we showed it in the
last show. This is his tweet or whatever.
Truth on so through social. I look forward
to watching the sick terrorist thugs, he says,
get twenty year sentences
for what they're doing to Elon Musk and
Tesla.
Okay. Well, the one that
burned seven cars or threw cocked muff tough
cocktails into a Tesla factory, assuming that wasn't
them to counteract their failing sales.
Yeah. Definitely charge them with a crime if
you can prove someone did that and that
wasn't something else.
But everybody else, because of that, because of
the way they've got the momentum going, scratching
a car, get you twenty years.
That's what he's
saying. And then he goes on to say,
perhaps they could serve in El Salvador prisons.
See,
just like Greenland and Panama, oh, they're trolling
you. Oh, he's just trying to he's just
trolling you until you're literally being sent to
an El Salvadoran prison.
Guys, this is not a joke. This is
one of the most serious things that we've
ever covered in regard to what Donald Trump
has been saying. He is quite literally floating
the idea of why sending Americans to a
foreign prison for a charge there's already a
crime for is what we might expect.
Here it is
again. And if we don't have Elon,
they could be up there a long time.
Who else is going to get him?
I think that's the astronaut's conversation. That's aft
this is where he starts. And I just
wanna thank him. He's going through a lot,
what they're doing to him.
And these people are gonna be caught, and
they they're gonna be caught in the Oh,
my god forbid. I feel so bad what
Elon's going through.
The richest man in the world
with one of the most powerful positions in
the world.
He's really struggling because people don't like him,
and they're burning his cars when he's a
billionaire.
I mean, why does it's just I can't
help but laugh. Now it shouldn't anything like
that matters. I mean, that's a crime. They
should be held accountable. Maybe he's suffering because
of whatever, but it's it's just it's inconsequential
in the larger sense of things. And especially
since this guy is a literal oligarch elitist.
You know, it just sounds funny that they
create this emotional draw. It's like you're watching
a TV show and you suddenly care about
your character. Oh my god. He's struggling.
I can't wait for the next episode. That's
that's what we're dealing with. Gotta be prosecuted.
And from what they tell me, I see
this just by watching your programs
and reading the news. But from what they
tell me, they could get twenty years in
jail, and they'll get it. I'll tell you.
There's gonna be no leniency and there'll be
no pardons.
You know what? One note, by the way.
He always does this the same way he
tries to act like he wasn't the one
that signed that act and tries to cook
it off to Rubio. It's because he senses
that there's a building problem.
What do you mean you only know it
from their re like, so yeah. Either you
just admitted that you're being informed by corporate
media
of what your administration is doing, which is
fucking terrifying. Oh, I just cussed. I'm so
sorry.
I that's I rarely do that. I slipped
on the show. For those new to the
show, it is family friendly, so I apologize
about that. I just kind of this should
make me laugh because it's like, it's just
crazy. But But, like, pretending that you don't
know what your administration's doing and you're reading
on the Washington Post about it is ridiculous.
But then, otherwise
or or I guess what the point is
is you trying to act like you're not
in the know. You're not you're not the
one making the decision. I don't know. I
was reading it like you are.
Shows you that he's trying to distance himself
from all of this. That's what I read
it as. Sorry for the curse. Let's keep
going.
By watching your programs
and reading the news, but from what they
tell me, they could get twenty years in
jail, and they'll get it. I'll tell you,
there's gonna be no leniency and there'll be
no pardons. I can tell you that right.
And you said this morning twenty years in
jail, and then maybe they get you said
this morning twenty years in jail, and then
maybe they'll go to one of these prisons
in El Salvador. Do you think with the
way that the
judges have been issuing injunctions,
it would be easier or harder to send
these Tesla domestic terrorists Wow. To a jail
in El Salvador that Now just note that
he's not balking at all. He's not smiling.
He's not acting like that was an offhanded
comment, a joke.
Straight deadpan.
Point blank.
Do you think that makes it easier or
harder to send these domestic terrorists to El
Salvador?
He's just just so it's clear,
these are American citizens, not Palestinian Americans, not
Muslims. They're American citizens.
And just because he wants to claim they're
terrorists and to argue he can move them
I mean, that should be the most chilling
thing we've ever discussed in this country. Literally
watching what we've always been worried is coming.
It's a very at least floating the idea
that, yeah, maybe that seems likely they are
terrorists.
My god. Wake up, America. You think with
the way that the judges have been issuing
injunctions,
it would be easier or harder to send
these Tesla domestic terrorists
to a jail in El Salvador than these
MS thirteen or Trendeiroguys?
Well, I view these people as terrorists just
like,
others. You say, when I looked at those,
showrooms burning
and those cars, not one or two, like,
seven, eight, 10 burning,
exploding all over the place.
These are terrorists. You didn't have that on
January 6, I can tell you. You didn't
have anything. And see, that's obviously the point
to go to. Right?
Democrats are worse. Don't you see? Like that
on January 6, which is sort of amazing
because on January 6, the the,
Democrats were talking.
Nobody was killed other than a
very beautiful young woman, Ashley
Ashley Babbitt.
I mean, it was Democrats are talking. I
mean, he just rambles. Like, I don't know.
He doesn't half the time, he's not coherent
because I think he's just trying to kind
of word his way around any kind of
accountability.
Don't take this as partisan support. They're all
monsters and and criminals.
Nobody was killed.
And you look at what's going on now
with these terrorists. He's a terrorist, so that's
an organized event. You know, take a look
at their signs. Take a look. See, these
are subjective points. I already addressed the sign
point. Yes. They're always funded. Every single group
that has any momentum is gonna get something
from some group. Doesn't make it good or
bad. And point is it's always there. Same
with the left. Same with the right. That
does not then make every single person you
broadly point out as some kind of terrorist
because you decide to make that the case.
It makes the term terrorist meaningless, which is
the point. Everything means nothing. Nothing means everything.
You look to the power structure to guide
you on what means what when they need
it to be me to mean something. Right?
So you're a terrorist because I said so.
Doesn't matter if you keyed a car, those
other people that have no connection to you
who did this even though we can't prove
that part of it, they did a bad
thing, so we made your thing a terrorist.
Is anybody proven the Molotov cocktails, those eight
Teslas? Who did it? Who's been arrested? Who's
in jail?
They keep throwing out all these bombastic claims
on some Democrat operation, which wouldn't surprise me.
Have we proven these things? We're jumping past
that to put people in jail who are
Americans and floating the idea of sending them
to a literal concentration camp. That's what this
is. Look it up. They've got no outside
areas. They have a small square of sunlight.
They barely get any time anywhere outside of
their cell, and they're be they're put to
hard labor. And if they're lucky enough to
get some kind of a a a hearing,
it's hundreds of people with one TV screen.
And as I understand it, they basically are
never leave.
Their lawyers can't even get in touch with
them right now. And let's not forget,
we're talking about people we've already proven, I'll
show you again in a second, are legally
or one specific example who already had been
given asylum, who was legally in The United
States, and they sent him to El Salvador.
And it turns out he's not even part
of the gang. He got a tattoo when
when he was a kid in in in
Dallas according to his mom. Now, yes, she
could be making it up, but guess what?
You know how you find out? In due
process, which he denied all of them, which
even if they were illegal aliens, all of
them would still have the right to due
process even according to Scalia, Reno versus Florida,
many different Supreme Court rulings.
All facts, all easily understood constitutional law, they
don't care. And guess what? They don't care
enough to go after American citizens.
They're all made by the same sign company,
and I see Yeah. Did you prove that?
See, what he's doing is pointing at what
some what instruction Barbie said that day.
Did how do you know they're all you
you mean all these people used all the
same sign company? Did you prove that? Seems
like a big bill. No. He's what he's
saying is they all had had similar well
crafted signs. That was the argument. Not a
single person, and I
prove me wrong, has gone out and said,
look. Here's the bill. They all went to
the sign company. We have that's not what
happened.
They're making a broad, subjective, personal appointment that
was, say, look. They all have the same
signs, and that becomes this man sitting at
the Oval Office claiming he knows they all
use the same sign company.
It's laughable, guys. That's how this works. Whether
that's Biden mumbling about 40 beheaded babies or
Trump claiming this, these people are tools.
I don't know why we can't see that
by now. Expensive job. Now these are, the
people that finance it
are, in my opinion, in just as big
a trouble as the people that are setting
the match and setting the fires.
So we'll see.
It's under very serious investigation by the FBI
and by the justice department. These people are
terrorists. Yeah. It's like the seventh time you
said that. You know, without any legal classification.
No. Just we call it that, therefore it
is. Well, that's classic US policy.
US government policy.
So this gets much more alarming as we
overlap this field of conversation.
Here, we already talked about this by the
way.
March 22, Trump could send Americans to El
Salvador.
Now, here is the tax this is not
a joke. This is the task force. So,
again, Panban D and everybody else saw America
First.
Right? We're gonna go after what? Antisemitism. We're
gonna investigate October 7. Now we have a
task force to go after people that
that key swastikas into Tesla cars.
Regardless of all of the people all, like,
emotionally wrapped up in the left right paradigm,
I'd like to believe that the majority of
this country looks at this whether they're right
leaning or not and go, come on.
This is the last thing we need to
go for. I mean, for sure, it's a
crime. Go after it. But to make this
the focal point,
This is about creating justification to go after
Americans for whatever they want to. How do
you see that as America First.
Pretty sure that's another country.
FBI launches Tesla task force quote this is
domestic terrorism.
How long have we been telling you that
you were becoming the focus? You were always
the focus, but they were turning this inward.
They were gonna make it their own documents
over the last fifteen years in in intelligence.
CIA, for example, or FBI, they've been writing
that you what is it called? Like, Battlefield
America or something like that, where they were
writing about not that that's the game. I
think there's there's whatever the title was, about
how domestic terrorism
was gonna be the focus or rather than
they don't people in this country. Well, Biden
couldn't stop screaming about domestic terrorism. Now Trump
is continuing
the agenda,
taking the baton in another flavor and continuing
to focus on Americans
for cars.
Now
in regard to the Venezuelan aspect,
let's let's not forget, Khalil, these the the
deportations, all of this is interconnected because realize
they sent these people to the El Salvador
prison, and now they're just kind of folding
it over into maybe Americans too.
Well, I'll include this again from Aaron here.
This is the sworn affidavit, which you can
link it's linked to as well, that is
about basically, this is the kid the one
kid that we know for sure. But the
other ones are up in up in the
air too. Their parents, their lawyers are screaming
all sorts of things, and there's no due
process, so we're never gonna find out apparently.
But this is because this kid was
legally in this country.
He had gone through the process, was given
asylum. So it doesn't matter whether you think
that's justifiable or not. That had happened, and
he was here legally by every law we
know, and they just didn't care.
Like, they don't care about your rights in
this country very clearly.
I Include that so you can look for
yourself.
But what's important about this, and we went
over that in the last show in-depth,
here's what he was asked or what he
said when talking about this in regard to
this process.
It says Donald Trump claimed Friday that the
law
gave him the authority to deport undocumented migrants
without having to explain himself to a judge.
That's quite literally the opposite of the law
in every context.
But says on Friday morning, Trump continued his
attack on the judiciary,
posting through social writing, quote, no district court
judge or any judge can assume the duties
of the president of The United States. Only
crime okay. No one is doing that, Trump.
That's that is his playing on the uneducated,
manipulating emotionally.
Okay. Let's be clear. You wanna argue that
a judge is abusing their power to manipulate
what you're trying to accomplish? That's a fair
claim. To argue they're trying to assume the
duties of the presidency is just a bombastic
way to trick dumb people into thinking that
they're breaking the law. The reality is the
judges, whether radically motivated or not, which I,
as always, argue probably all of them, what
they did is completely within the law. They
challenged
through their ruling whether what they did was
legal. Now let's just say they're wrong. There's
already a very clear process, by the way,
which they're already going through. So this is
clearly not about that, to push back on
that and to say, no, they're wrong. Here's
the law. The next go to the Supreme
Court if you want to. That's how the
check and balance system is supposed to work.
To argue that them doing so, even if
they don't are doing so through their own
political views,
is somehow a challenge to the law is
a complete misrepresentation
of how the system works.
It's as simple as that.
So he goes on to say or goes
on to say, at a late morning Oval
Office press conference with Hegseth,
a reporter asked, mister president, do you think
you have the authority, the power to round
up people and deport them?
And then you're under no obligation to court
to a court to show the evidence against
them. It's a question.
He says, quote, well, that's what the law
says, and that's what our country needs.
That's not true in any context. No matter
what you think, what you're doing like, look.
If they're illegally illegal aliens, you don't need
some abstract way to remove them. They're already
you could already arrest them and deport them
right now.
That's why you have to recognize they're using
what you want to manipulate us. They're turning
this against you.
The point is he does not have that.
These people
have the right to due process.
As I've shown many times, and I think
this pop up right here again.
I think it's this one.
This is Brino versus Flores. That's Scalia, in
fact. And he says the fifth amendment entitles
aliens to due process of law, in particular
in deportation proceedings.
There's plenty of other reports showing you the
constitution protects all people. We just read an
article where one of these other experts were
telling you the same. To anybody, all person,
every with the fifth amendment, the fourteenth amendment,
it says, any person who
it's the obvious reality. And I I don't
need to make this point for the fifth
five hundredth time. People who don't want this
to be the case will always push back.
It is the case. Khalil, especially, has a
green card, but everybody, even illegal aliens.
But even more, like, an asylum someone who's
been granted asylum, somebody with a green card,
without question, guys, they have the right to
due process in the first amendment and everything
else.
So him saying that the law allows him
to do that,
I'm showing this for two reasons. One, to
show you how shockingly wrong that is, but
two, because of what we're gonna show you
next.
So just don't forget that Trump here is
telling you that he did do that. We
removed them without due process because that's what
the law says. Okay. Remember that.
This is how they're always playing both sides
of this argument. So first, which, you know,
whether this means something to you or not,
I mean, it's Venezuela. So people that have
a political side will choose to ignore it
or not. That's how the partisan game works.
People that are open minded with their objective
and nonpartisan, read it because it might be
relevant to you. Venezuelan minister says no Trende
Aragua members among The US deportees.
I mean, frankly, I find it hard to
believe. Venezuela might have an interest in trying
to lie about it, but you can decide
for yourself. The point is simply showing you
that Venezuela is claiming they're not in that
gang,
which if that's the truth, and the point
is we could prove that if they were
given due process. You see how this works?
Then that would be a big deal.
I mean, maybe about something else entirely.
But this is where it gets interesting. So
Trump just said he did do that with
no per due process because he that's what
the law says.
Jump forward a couple of days,
Trump borders our so Holman says he won't
defy the order on Venezuelan migrants amid the
battle with the courts.
So they're bowing to what the courts are
doing
even though they were acting like that. They're
not allowed to do it, and they're okay.
But that was going well. I won't challenge
that. He says the Trump administration will not
defy a judge's order. A judge's order blocking
the use of war powers, that's the alien
the, wartime aliens act,
to deport alleged Venezuelan gang members according to
boarders our Tom Holland.
He told ABC News this week programmed that
the Venezuelans
recently deported to El Salvador
had been given their due process.
But then he adds weirdly, cryptically, according to
laws currently on the books.
What?
Okay. Just to be clear,
laws on the books is not the same
as constitutional rights.
Right? These are amendments to the constitution. The
laws in the books, if
undermine the constitution according to Mayberry versus Madison,
eighteen o '3,
no one void.
So whether they secretly wrote some law that
claims they can just ignore rice, it doesn't
change the reality that that is the the
unalienable
god given rights to anybody in this country,
anybody in the world, quite frankly, which is
how that reads. But the idea here, according
to current laws in the books
well, Trump just said he did deport them
without due process because that's what the law
said. So you guys seem to make them
the same point, but you're gonna need to
get your talking points in line. The idea
being that the laws that we understand, the
way that we interpret it, allow us to
remove them the way we did without due
process. He's simply trying to make it a
little more opaque by saying we did give
them that, but the way that the current
law reads. So you didn't give them due
process. You
based it on some terrorism law that claims
you'd you you have to put them in
I mean, it's all opaque.
The reality, as we know, according to lawyers,
according to Trump himself, is that they simply
deported them without due process because they're terrorists.
That's what we keep being told. Weirdly enough,
Holman gives you a different answer. I think
all these people are uncomfortable about how one
of them may be the one thrown under
the bus because all of what they're doing,
let's be clear,
is illegal.
It's not hard to see. You may agree
with it, but it doesn't change the fact
that it is illegal.
So
why are they reading it like that or
saying it like that? Now so the Trump
administration says
those deported were members of the gang,
but relatives of the immigrants, advocates, and some
of the men have said that they're not.
Well, yeah. Well, we'd be able to find
out how they've been given due process. Right?
That's the whole point right there. If he's
right that they were given due process, then
we would have access to the information. We
would know what they were
charged with. We would know what they presented
as their evidence. The lawyers would know. So,
guys, we know that didn't happen because the
lawyers of these people are like, we can't
even contact them. So Homan is lying or
really very cryptically trying to make it sound
like they did, but when you read with
the current laws, you know that's not what
happened.
Holman said he would not defy the current
the judges with Bozberg's order, but reiterated the
Trump administration would continue to crack down on
what it deems to be threats. Well, what
do you know?
So, apparently, you can go after immigrants without
this law. It's like we all told you
in the first place. Right? Because so if
they can continue doing this through normal deportation
routes,
then you already know they didn't need to
create some wartime act in emergency
to so why did they do it then?
And why did they rush it out secretly
and do because this is a stepping stone.
They didn't need something new to port illegal
aliens. They needed you to go along with
something new that allowed them to go after
you.
It says, quote, we're going to continue to
arrest public safety threats. See how broad it
is now? And national security threats.
We will keep targeting the worst of the
worst.
Well, they've already pivoted into that being Democrats.
They pivoted entirely into that being domestic terrorists
who are Democrats.
That should be very alarming, guys.
Especially since, I mean, anybody. They they call
me a Democrat half the time, even though
I think they're all ridiculous.
So that's where we are.
Funny how they're all saying, radically motivated, impeach
the judges. And he's like, no, that one's
okay. We're not gonna challenge that one. Like,
there's such a disconnect between what's real, what
they're even within the administration.
I think they know that there's problems happening
right now.
Now this is from the independent, Trump White
House, and this is what we wrote. This
is the other part of the title.
This is what it's it's like I don't
this is one of those I told you
so moments.
How long just since the this has been
beginning. We've been telling you this is incremental.
White Trump White House. Now it does say
could
let federal agents search homes
without warrants
under the Alien Enemies Act. Okay.
So, Bowman says, okay, we're gonna hold off
on,
you know, mass deportations under the guise of
the Aliens Act while this is processing.
Again, showing you that they didn't need that
to begin with.
But since it's already there,
maybe we can use it this way.
Knock down another rule, law, right, in another
direction. So now they've already established the mass
deportation if they want to. Now they may
go after your homes
under the guise of the the claim that
maybe you're housing an illegal immigrant.
Now, it says lawyers for Donald Trump's administration
are currently considering whether his in a in
a invocation of the eighteenth century wartime law
allows federal law enforcement
to enter homes without a warrant.
Guys,
I mean, especially Republicans and conservatives,
you know damn well that these things are
sacred. These things are the you know, things
that we have been speaking about and talking
things that you have been defending.
Don't allow them to use what you care
about to shoehorn in exactly what we should
be fighting. It doesn't matter the logic.
For them to go into a home without
a warrant should be that that's shall not
be infringed, guys. That's what it means. Not
except we made this point during COVID nineteen.
Right? It wasn't that this is the case
until a pandemic comes along. No, guys. That's
not how it works. The logic is the
same no matter what the explanation excuse is.
You know that.
Have the courage to call it out. Now
it says and, again, it says without due
process. The president deployed the enemies the alien's
enemy acts to deport them without due process.
That weird Tom home the Tom Homan part
of it, I think, is indicative of them
trying to muddy the waters.
It's his officials, however, have admitted that they
that many of the immigrants flown to these
prisons
have no criminal record.
Now, of course, you could point out that
some of them were illegal aliens. But regardless,
they have rights. They weren't given. But then
on top of that, it's like, okay. So
somebody comes to this country illegally in many
cases because they are running from stuff that
the US government is doing. But at the
very least, maybe just because they then aren't
you the ones that always told us they
want a better life?
Okay. Fine. So the point is you then
deport them to a concentration Guantanamo style camp
because they're have no criminal record, but we're
illegally here? Like, the hatred people have been
grown to have for anybody, like, in that
very category
is is disgusting.
Now, yes, there are some potential criminals.
Like, there are all over the American citizens
too. But the idea that you can just
deport them away when they're not even from
El Salvador, guys, it just opens up so
many doors, and they're abusing every one of
them.
It says terrorists don't get to hide behind
closed doors. Oh, now we know they're all
terrorists. Right? Even though they've already proven that
many of them are not, if not all
of
them. And they're calling them he's calling Americans
who key cars terror terrorists right now. So
his argument is, well, if you're behind a
closed door and we think you're there, you
can't hide anymore.
The administration is mulling whether federal agents can
search a suspected
gang members
is for to search for suspected gang members
inside people's homes
without securing a warrant. Well, guys, they already
have 17 different ways around that. Whether it's
the swatting discussion, which by the way is
weirdly coming around right now even though a
lot of it seems to be hype. There's
clear examples of it, but some of them
are people that just get a top that
cop that comes to the door, and they
call that swatting. But, again, that should not
be diminished. Swaddying is a ridiculous thing that
I think they allow.
My point though
is right now, they could argue welfare check.
Right? Or any number of overlaps you've already
seen where they just burst in your door
without anything.
No knock warrants, for example, even if they
that that's a warrant, but in examples where
you're not told. There's so many variations of
this. So this is just the extension of
what has already been happening. Now coming from
the very person who you argue is fighting
for these things.
That's usually how it goes.
It's unclear whether the administration is providing law
enforcement agencies with that guidance, which could amount
to drastic breach of the Fourth Amendment.
Could, and constitutional
constitutional
protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. Okay.
Plenty of overlaps here. One, they don't know
for sure, so they can suspect
somebody's there and violate your rights. So right
there, obviously, that's not how that works. Or
let's say they know someone is there. It's
still your
it you know, that that's if you read
it specifically,
unreasonable search and seizure is only one part,
but the idea being that this is something
that, as always, all of them shall not
be infringed. They don't get to say, but
we think that someone's in there.
They can come knock on your door and
say, we know someone's in there. They don't
need to come bursting in with a warrant.
The bottom line is or rather without a
warrant is the idea here.
If they're creating an opaque rationale that they
can use whenever they want to.
And in no way is it in line
with constitutional rights.
The fourth amendment applies to everyone
in The United States, it says. Not just
individuals with legal status,
says Christopher Welborn, president of the National Association
of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
Quote, taking away that right would be an
abuse of power that destroys our privacy, making
Americans feel unsafe and vulnerable in the places
where our children play and our loved ones
sleep.
Quote, thus far, it's been used to deport
Venezuelan immigrants, but the administration believes it can
be used to search Venezuelan immigrants' homes and
arrest them even without a warrant. Now the
way they frame it seems to suggest that
anyone they might suspect would house one, but
you know how broad that can become.
It is impossible to overstate how important it
is for our judicial institutions,
our congress, he says, and for every American
to stand against this. I agree.
Down here, it says Bolzberg, and this is
what I find interesting. Now look, That's this
judge you keep seeing everywhere. Elon Musk is
paying people to to try to impeach, which
is insanely criminal in my opinion, or at
least I mean, I I think I just
don't understand how anybody can't anybody honest wouldn't
call that out. You're paying people to vote
even if it's against impeachment. It's just clearly
a compromise situation.
My point is I think all of these
people are politically active. Clearly, Elon Musk and
Trump are. There's no question there. But all
sides of it, people they wanna appoint would
do so because they're on their side. It's
how this game works. That's why our system
is completely
decrepit and broken
for because all of them.
My point though is that even though that's
the case,
you can read what's actually happening and recognize
that what they're doing is most more often
than not, like, whether you wanna look back
at old cases or things he said about
previous discussions where he's clearly politically motivated, what's
happening here, which I find very interesting, is
rooted in what I think I mean, arguably,
the bigger picture being what they're doing is
wrong.
So even if you argue some political point,
he's right to push back on this. That's
not siding with anybody. It's just the the
reality of what they're doing is a violation
of your rights. But here's what it says.
Bolzberg repeatedly questioned how officials are determining
whether someone is a member of that gang.
Seems pretty logical to me without due process
because they're not being given due process. How
in the world do you decide whether they
are or not? Well, I had a tattoo.
Yeah. Well, so do a lot of people.
And you could prove that in some of
these kids that didn't are that are not
part of these gangs that simply got these
tattoos. And again, in that kid, the case
of the kid is not even the exact
tattoo. It's just a rose like tattoo, and
they use that to deport him.
Somebody again who was legally in this country.
And it said and that that's why they
declared them a terrorist organization to try to
give themselves some more
legal groundwork.
But it says,
he's asking repeatedly how they're able to determine
this without giving them due process. And what
legal recourse exists
if the administration deported someone to El Salvador
or elsewhere under this act, Alien Enemies Act,
if they're not a member of the gang.
Well, that's kinda the whole point. Right? The
way they did this has created a a
situation where it's almost impossible to ever find
out.
That's the whole thing about if you read
about this prison structure before this, a guy
who's also a tried and true, like, open
Zionist,
It's not my opinion. This that what's his
name? Bukele.
Very much so aligned with Israel and very
much so in line with the same kind
of action or even what they've done with
the prison system. They got they they
removed all the judges. They basically it's just
what they're this is an authoritarian location.
Everywhere their allies right now are leaning desperately
into authoritarianism
and calling it freedom.
Just look at Prospera, which I'm going to
cut. I know I keep saying it, but
it will be having a show coming up
about freedom cities and the whole overlap. Technocracy.
But over a year,
before all this, there's been very a lot
of talk about these locations.
And these are horrible places rife with torture
and rape and and and all sorts of
things. There's been reports long before this. That's
where they're sending people just because they were
here illegally with no criminal record.
Think about ending up in a place like
that, like Guantanamo Bay, that you never leave
from because you were in especially in some
cases where you were fleeing some kind of
atrocity that was being conducted by this government,
especially in Venezuela.
Now it says the administration has admitted in
the court filings that many, quote, many of
the nearly 300 Venezuelans on those flights don't
have a criminal record. And that's why you
hear them speak in their broad generalities about
how they're all very terrible gang members and
terrorists and
that's absolutely not correct.
In a sworn statement of the court, immigration
ICE,
Robert Serna,
claimed that a lack of a criminal record,
quote, this is what he said,
actually highlights
the risk they pose
and, quote, demonstrates that they are terrorists with
regard to whom we lack a complete profile.
So the their allegation
is the proof. Sort of like when Obama
said, well, if we bomb somewhere,
people that get killed are combatants because they're
there.
Children are not. And that's that's a real
thing. So they just called them, we killed
10 combatants. And do we just because they
were there where we bombed. If they're there,
we bombed, and they're combatants. Very Israeli of
them. In this case,
the idea that you can argue that the
lack of criminal record
shows they're a terrorist that we just don't
know enough about
is is the idea that you accuse someone
of a terrorist means they are. And if
they don't have a record, it simply shows
that we just need to investigate more. That's
so wildly Orwellian.
It's again,
so much of this really is terrifying. It
it is more than we've ever seen,
and they're telling you point blank.
Attorneys and family members have warned,
excuse me, the court that their clients and
relatives, some of whom have their asylum hearings
in the coming weeks and months, one of
which already got it and was granted asylum.
The point is there's many of them that
were in the process and they took them
too. That's also illegal,
Have disappeared from The United States and cannot
even be reached in the prison there in
this El Salvador prison if that's where they
even are.
Get ready, guys. Warrantless searches based on the
guys that they think something.
We used to know we used to be
pretty strong, especially Republican, that this was shall
not be infringed.
I mean, how long until he makes the
argument about guns or something else? You know,
it's just it clearly is in the all
the same direction.
Now just an overlapping point,
weirdly timed, Trump says any country buying Venezuelan
oil
slap with 25% tariff.
I mean, these are so over the top.
So no country in the world is able
to buy oil from Venezuela? How do you
pretend you can even do that? That's economic
terrorism, guys, because Venezuela is poking you in
the eye. That's what's happening. Because Venezuela is
speaking up and saying those aren't terrorists. And,
you know, they they push back and said
you can't just deport them back to Venezuela.
So Trump's angry about that. And now because
they went to Salvador instead, he's made it
look like what they're doing, which
is authoritarian.
So you
were gonna slap tariffs on you for no
reason.
It's just insane, guys. This is going to
this is I mean, how does this not
blow up in the face of America?
This to me is being done for something
else, not for American interests.
Of course,
Rubio
says there is zero tolerance for state for
terrorism or terrorist sympathizers in The United States.
Of course, they're trying to make these statements
in regard to what they're claiming are terrorists
while they literally support terrorism everywhere in the
world, including in this country. Because you can
show very clear examples of all the overlaps,
whether that is Israel, whether they whatever their
allies are. We can see examples of that
overlap as they're carrying out all sorts of
terrorist acts.
And he says, those who support designated terrorist
groups including Hamas. You mean, like, Israel who
funds Hamas?
Oh, whoops. That's not what he meant.
Threaten our national security like they do every
single day. The United States has zero tolerance
for foreign visitors who support terrorists.
Okay. Well, there's
a endless procession of Israelis who openly support
what's going on in there. But see, it's
not only about Israel, guys. The point is
hypocrisy. You could show plenty of examples of
people that support carrying out terrorism in Saudi
Arabia, people that support carrying out terrorism in
Syria, people that support carrying out terrorism in
Sudan. Everywhere, guys. These people are the most
shocking hypocrites that we can look at today.
And literally what they're doing is saying people
keying cars right now in this country, but
they're not allowed here anymore,
While supporting the most accurate example of terrorism
we've ever seen
everywhere in the world.
It really is an insult to our intelligence
and it's sick because these people are gross.
They're bad people.
And here is the same example.
Phil Labonte
says Teddy Roosevelt was right. Well, he was
also right when he said that it was
servile and
morally treasonable to the American public to blindly
support the president. That was his quote.
But he says, Roosevelt has ideas on immigrants.
Nineteen o seven, it says, in the first
place,
we should insist that if the immigrant who
comes here is good faith in good faith
becomes an American and assimilates himself to us.
He shall be treated on an exact equality
with everyone else, for it is an outrage
to discriminate against any such man because of
creed, birthplace, or origin.
But
this is predicated upon the person's becoming
an American in every facet an American, or
becoming in every facet an American.
And nothing but American.
You see where this is going.
There can be no divided allegiance here, he
says.
Any man who says he is an American,
but something else also isn't an American at
all.
We have room for but one flag, the
American flag. We have room for but one
language here, and that is the English language.
And we have room for but one soul
loyalty, and that is the loyalty of the
American people. Now there's many points to make
here. First is the it gets kind of
intermittent in between, but the the one of
the points he's making throughout it
is that they have to assimilate. Right? One
language, one flag. Okay. Well, that's obviously changed
in this country over a long period of
time. And even then, you could argue that,
you know, like, for example, in The UK,
like, Winston Churchill, for example, despite being pointed
back as some kind of a piece, this
guy was a rabid, rabid racist with some
of the most disgusting views. It's all public.
People still have to talk about it. And
you can make the same arguments about a
lot of the people in this country, the
leadership back then and after.
That realistically, there was a lot of, you
know, feigned things that weren't really what they
felt. Bottom line is
the argument that you can't, you know, just
basically on the constitution,
have a different language, or just come to
this country and not want to assimilate at
all. Completely you're right.
Anything else is not liberty. But that's not
the same conversation because people have different opinions
about that. That's why we fall back on
the constitution. See how that works? The other
point he makes though, as Elon Musk goes,
yes,
is obvious.
Right? So he's saying basically, you can't really
you can't go after somebody and discriminate because
of their creed, birthplace, or well, you're already
failing in that case, Elon Musk, along with
all of you. Everyone's support. You're all failing
in that regard. But
he says, but they have to make themselves
American every facet. Okay.
What does he mean by that?
American and nothing but an American. Okay. Then
what about the people out there professing to
be Israeli as well? How about Brian Mass,
who's also in the IDF? Doesn't that exactly
meet this for yes. It does.
Now you could maybe argue Elon Musk is
pointing to that, but you know damn well
he's not. He's trying to make this about
Hamas supporters, about domestic terrorists, keying pesos. That's
what he's talking about. Look at the rest
of his timeline.
It says there can be no divided allegiance
here. Okay. Same point. What about those that
are publicly telling you that they have dual
loyalty to Israel?
It's not a it's not a racist point.
It's not about only Jewish people. There's plenty
of overlap to all sorts of places. This
is about a government and its operations.
So that's clearly also the point. But it
goes, any man who says he's American but
also something else
is not American. Okay.
Now I I flatly disagree with the point
that you can't be American if you believe
you're something else.
The only point to be made is if
you're any kind of in any kind of
a power position of any political influence, then
you should not be allowed to have dual,
nationality.
Whether it's The UK, China, Russia, Israel, because
that obviously presents a potential conflict. It's just
basic logic.
The only one in the world that applies
is is or doesn't apply to is Israel.
And weird. What do you know? We've got
a Zionist pact administration who's basically doing everything
for one country right now. What a surprise.
So my point is this is this is
being done to try to deviate the conversation
to look at these people while that they
are the most obvious example of what he's
pointing to.
And Randall Rose says better get all his
Israeli flags out of congress then. Right? Exactly.
And what's funny is this person goes, yep,
and points to the one person with a
Palestinian flag, which, yeah, same point, by the
way. Just to be obviously, logically, accurate, consistent,
which is what we do,
that that also applies.
If we're the the obvious point to be
made. Now, whether she's doing that because they're
all putting up out Israeli flags is irrelevant.
They are putting up a flag that represents
another country. Now we can all argue that
maybe it shouldn't matter at all and let
everybody do it. Same argument. I argue it
shouldn't be allowed because all that does is
create a potential conflict of interest.
I think that's very obvious.
So if we're gonna apply it equally, we
should, but you know damn well that's not
what they're pointing to. So it's just silly.
America will be able to go and nobody
could be here and support these. You know,
it's it's obvious what they are.
Now
this is building in the North American
Union
world new world order direction very rapidly.
Trump has now ordered military plans to be
drawn up to literally seize the Panama Canal.
Now the history around this aside and US'
obvious involvement,
that's not where we currently stand. Okay? The
real whether China gets more involved or not,
the idea that he thinks they can just
step in and take what they want shows
you everything you know about these people. They
think the same thing about you and your
home and your rights if they just decide
to claim national security.
It's no different than the Biden administration, guys.
This is your government that we need to
fight and stop. I don't mean violently. I
mean, literally take action through our political process
if you think that's what matters. But whatever
action you think needs to be taken to
stop them from continuing to destroy this country.
And, again, hear me. I am not talking
about violence.
I do not believe that's the route forward.
I think violence begets violence, but I do
believe we need to stand and push back
against what's happening.
And same thing in Greenland.
Here's what Vance just said.
Arc which controls Greenland, it's not doing its
job, and it's not being a good ally.
So you have to ask yourself, how are
we going to solve that problem, solve our
own national security? If that means that we
need to take more territorial interest in Greenland,
that is what president Trump is going to
do because he doesn't care about what the
Europeans scream at us. He cares about putting
the interest of America's citizens first. Oh, right.
Because it's in our interest to take to
literally take someone else's territory.
But hold on. Let me play this again.
I wanna hear Which controls Greenland. It's not
doing its job and it's not being a
good ally. Okay. Doing its job?
I mean, its job with its territory is
whatever it wants it to be.
That no. That's for Greenland and their people
to decide. The idea that The US can
say they're not doing their job, again, it
shows you the way they view the world.
And so too as all of our our
just all of our US government as long
far back as you wanna look.
Remember when Trump came out last administration the
first time and said, we won't be the
policeman of the world? He knew you wanted
to hear that, guys, then he went on
to do the same things he's doing now.
They see themselves as the people in control
of everything.
And so they're telling you, they're not doing
what they're supposed to. You have no in
no ability to tell them what they're supposed
to be doing with their territory.
So you have to ask your job, and
it's not being a good ally. So you
have to Good ally being whatever The US
wants. Ask yourself, how are we going to
solve that problem, solve our own national security
if it's national security now that we need
to control this area. You know where this
goes about whether it's the resources, whether it's
I mean, there's a lot of overlaps.
So whenever they claim national security, it means
we take whatever we want from anybody with
no justification because we need it. It's our
you know, it's national security.
Just ask the rest of the world. They're
they're very well aware of how this works.
That means that we need to take more
territorial interest in Greenland. By the way, he
means by take more territory interest, he means
take more territory.
Nothing new. Seizing Syria, seizing Lebanon, seizing that's
Israel, but The US is right there with
them.
The US is involved with this all over
the world, marching around and taking territory everywhere
you look.
Here's what
Arnab Patran had to say.
He said, this is actually pathetically sad. In
order to justify the annexation of Greenland
hold on. Is that that same video?
Yeah. Just wanna make sure that was the
video. He says, in order to justify the
annexation of Greenland, by the way, which half
the pop the tea the party said we
were all falling for.
JD Vance now says Denmark is not a
good ally even though you couldn't possibly find
a more committed ally,
a more committed US vassal state in the
entire European Union. Here's why.
They're a founding member of NATO. They participated
in nearly every major US led military operation.
Whenever The US asked, even the most controversial
ones like Iraq, Denmark was revealed to be
the base for the NSA spying on Europe,
the European leaders. There's a link to Reuters
right there. Denmark always buys American military equipment
over European alternatives, usually, which are worse and
cost more.
They're they've agreed to host a major US
military base in Greenland.
What more could The US possibly want to
consider them a good ally? He says, apparently,
the answer is let us annex 98% of
your territory.
That's all it is, guys. So you're bad
now because you don't give us what we
want. And as he writes, and this is
the most important point,
fantastic demonstration
that nations that willingly become vassals aren't rewarded
with gratitude or security.
They're merely signal
weakness that invites further aggression. That's the world
of might makes right.
That's who they
are.
In another point, response responsible statecraft reports that
Trump has now ordered slashes to red tape
our foreign weapon sales.
Right. Because Liberty
winning, you know, some money for weapon sales
to despots around the world. That's what this
is. Trump was working on delivering what could
be a big win for US Arms Contractors.
Is that what we all want? Like, you
know what one of the biggest scams of
this whole thing is, by the way? That
is because president Trump Oops. Sorry.
As we kinda wrap here, a couple more
points.
When they were able to effectively convince a
large portion of the base
that when they made money that you were
winning was one of the best examples was
one of the most successful manipulations they've had.
To argue that they that the 1% or
whatever, the point o 1%, the the military
contractors.
We made lots of money on this or
these big businesses made money because of our
terror. When they convince you that that meant
you were making money, that you were succeeding,
even if The US economy was better than
that meant you were succeed, when they convince
you of that, that was one of the
best manipulations they've done. Because they've got enough
people to scream about, We're winning because Tesla,
or because when that affects nothing but their
bottom line.
Look through history.
The idea of trickle down economics is a
complete it's a scam.
It never works. They never end up trickling
down to the average person because they enrich
themselves like we've seen over and over and
over. So, the point is here do because
he
God.
It's killing me.
Is that they are telling you that all
of this, what they're doing is a representation
of America getting better. No. That's a representation
of the
the top of the pyramid
continuing to consolidate power wealth.
Arms contractors of which they're a part is
is clearly.
Political pro reported that Thursday, the White House
is currently, quote, drafting an executive order, of
course, they are, aimed at streamlining the federal
government's process of selling weapons overseas. Okay. Here's
a great example.
To argue that you can write an executive
order that that removes regulations of you selling
weapons to foreign countries and act like that
applies somehow is insane.
They these are dictatorial decrees. They're just saying
this is the real why even write it
down? Seeing this how it's meaningless if you
could just return it back. It's a it's
a statement. It's a decree.
It's illegal.
There's plenty of the international law that they're
already assigned to that would argue you can't
just sell weapons however you want, but they
already do anyway.
If you look at the reports year after
year, the US government continues to sell weapons
to the most dangerous locations in the world.
The ones that represent the most likely position
to be sold to other despots, to be
used to kill children, to be used I
mean, it's report comes out every year, And
The US is at the top of that
list.
No one tries to explain that.
Look at what they're doing in Israel, guys.
This is who we talk about. This is
who they are, and it's not unique to
Wright. It's the comp the US government. And
speaking of that, as we mentioned, we we
briefly pointed out earlier,
here's Turkey continuing this this direction. I haven't
seen anybody really calling this out. They're a
NATO ally. Turkey has now gone after they've
arrested politicians.
Now they've arrested 1,100
journalists.
Or rather, excuse me, journalists among the 1,100
people they've arrested in this crackdown.
Now who knows? Maybe they're all part of
some
deep who knows? My point is that nobody
seems to be batting an eye. Can you
imagine if this was done in one of
their adversarial countries where they arrest politicians and
journalists? I mean, Israel's killing them and no
one bats an eye. I guess they're taking
their lead. Right? So the point is all
these different governments are pulling the mask off.
They're going full authoritarian.
Now you got Conor McGregor, another rapist running
for politician for president near Ireland. Got Andrew
Tate running for somewhere else. I mean, god
help us if these people fully take power
around the world.
Israel, to end a few points here,
in regard to journalist overlaps as we just
saw Turkey going after journalists. Well, in Israel,
in Gaza, they're still killing them. Israel has
deliberately killed another journalist,
somebody who's been continuing to report on this
from the very beginning.
Mohammed, Mohammed,
Mohammed Malzor
had an airstrike on his family's home in
Khan Yunus.
That's now 210
journalists or more that have been killed since
October 7.
Can you even imagine? I mean,
I don't even I mean, it's just it's
the same thing every time.
It's hard to even be outraged anymore, you
know, like, even though absolutely am. See, it
just be the it's it's it's
I don't even know what the right word
is. For how long we've been pointing at
this, how obvious it is, how the rest
of the world clearly sees it. We need
to see who the real bad guys are
in all of this. That doesn't even mean
that there has to be good guys. Understand.
The point is that who we need to
recognize are the very clear actor who is
ignoring this, who is supporting this, who is
funding this, any one of them, whether it's
UK, The United States, Israel, they're all
villains.
I don't know how else you frame that.
Now, of course, The US is now continuing
to strike Yemen.
Now, of course, it says targeting Yemen's Houthi
Rebels, killing at least one person. It's a
hell of a lot more than that. And
then AP, like all the rest, pulling punches.
The reality is, like, we have Pete Hegseth
said, we bombed the the Houthi capital.
Oh, you mean Sana'a? You mean the the
densely populated civilian location? Yes. Now they they
call it the Houthi capital because they wanna
dehumanize what they're doing. We already showed you
the horrifying video of children
with arms blown off and faces covered in
ash, bloodied up. That was in Yemen, and
they proudly pointed out terrorists.
Well, they're calling you terrorists too, guys.
Here's to what's actually going on. This is
Pepe Escobar on the ground as we showed
you in the beginning.
This is what they want you to think
is their Houthi stronghold.
A
a civilian
residential location,
like everywhere else they're bombing.
Surna, capital of Yale. Oh, and this is
low, and it gets even lower when the
camera turns away. I won't jump back in,
so you can turn the volume up. And
I'll wait when I'm done.
Sana,
capital of Yemen.
This is what CENTCOM
does best,
forming civilian
buildings
This is our residential neighborhood. It's about
two and a half kilometers from
the center of the exit in Saudi.
And
once again,
the president of The United States who says
that the Houthis and Yemenis are barbarians and
here, they are going to annihilate them. This
is what they do at night because they're
cowards. They bomb civilians.
It's the truth. As he said, what he
meant what he said was they they're going
to annihilate them as what Trump promised. Right?
And then they go to bomb a very
obvious residential location. Now may now there's many
number of reasons that might be the case.
Maybe because they chose to bomb civilians because
that's what they do. Maybe it's because they
were given bad,
data from from Israel that is involved in
this. Because Israel clearly wants to go up
to civilians. We shouldn't be even botting an
eye at that.
I just find it hard to believe they
would be so bladed with it, but who
knows? Maybe that's where they're going with this
now. The bottom line is whatever it is,
they killed a bunch of civilians, and they're
trying to hide that. Or rather just trying
to act like they killed only terrorists like
they do every
time. Now in regard to Iran, other points
to include here, NSA Waltz demands Iran
give up entire nuclear program, including civilian enrichment.
Now Trump is literally saying, we're gonna go
to war if you don't actually, you know
what? I'm gonna talk about this more in
the next show because I wanna give this
more time. There's a point here we're gonna
get into.
Oh, you know what? I didn't even include
it, so that's actually good. I'm gonna come
back to this because I wanna get into
what Scott Ritter was saying. There's actually some
really interesting overlaps here from Scott. I'm glad
you're finished and forget included. Yeah. Okay.
And and he's it's interesting because he he
knows what he's talking about here, and he
makes some interesting arguments about why it seems
that Trump is leading us to, like, nuclear
war.
And people misunderstand, like, him, like, arguing that
we should be doing that. That's not what
he's saying. He's just showing you how likely
it seems that with this direction that Trump
is gonna use what they call the tactical
nuclear weapons. He points back to the Bush
administration,
to to Trump and today where they've been
basically building what they call tactical nukes and
act like that's not the same thing. And
as even Putin pointed out, when those things
are used from their perspective, they can't tell
the difference. Now maybe that's changed today.
But what what he said then was, well,
then we will respond as if they fired
a nuke. Because it really makes no difference.
And at the same time, it is still
a huge increase.
All they did was normalize the potential for
nuclear warfare. It's insane. And Trump rapidly increased
that. So my point
here is that they're threatening give up what
every other country in the world is about
to have, including nuclear weapons, by the way,
which Iran is not seeking according to everything
we know from the state department itself. Even
the IAEA said they are not.
That's not to say that they might not
be doing it now. I don't know, but
the evidence does not show that.
And the point is that there's been different
people floating that they may need to now
because of what's happening. I mean, the point
is you obviously see where this is going
with, like, a North Korea example where they
did reach that and all of a sudden,
no one even talks about them anymore. It
shows you there is the currents there. But
that's Iran has been clear that is a
is a violation of their beliefs.
So maybe somebody comes into power that doesn't
think that way, which by the way seems
to be what they try to accomplish by
putting other people in power they could then
use to rationalize that. But
by them threatening to get rid of what
they claim is a nuclear program would get
rid of everything, it's it's just a it's
a random violation. Every country in the world
is legally allowed to have civilian programs, and
everything they do proves they're not having a
weapons program. And always making the claim is
that's the case anyway, so we'll move it.
That's what Israel's doing. Trump is literally opening
his mouth and Israel's coming out.
But all this is gonna lead to is
the potential conflict when they just don't go
along with what Trump says.
That seems to be a plan. We're gonna
go back to this more in the next
show, more about Iran and where that's going.
But just to end in general, with Syria
and and and Israel,
Syria has not has not ended. I mean,
it's just continuing to get worse and worse
and worse. If you don't remember, they funded
Al Qaeda.
Hayat al Sham, on those row, they funded
terrorists the entire time.
We've been telling you that for years. And
the moment that they got us out of
the way, those very terrorists became the people
they backed
because we told you they were backing them
the whole time. It's not hard to see.
They took them off the terrorist list. Jelani
is in charge. He's the president now. Right?
Well, Israel, shocking, spends more troops to Syria.
You know why? Because it was always Israel's
agenda.
Two thirds of Syria is what they have
been designed for for greater Israel. It's right
on their map.
The point is that as always,
The US is fighting Israel's wars. So they
fought in Syria this whole time.
US personnel lost their lives.
And the moment they take control,
Israel steps in, takes everything.
Builds bases, deploys troops,
has Golan Heights.
No one says a word. Even Golan, even
the Haltai Hetir el Sham is like, we
won't go against Israel.
So how do you not see that The
US has been fighting Israel's war for Syria
this whole time at your expense, and they
just took it?
Well, now they put more troops in. They
build bases already, and they're launching air strikes
on multiple sides, which I believe, as as
Vanessa has talked about, that there are factions
starting to try to push back. So they're
bombing them anyway.
Now here is the Gilani regime
posting on TikTok like everybody else seems to
do, like the IDF post when they murder
children,
openly threatening to behead Christians and minorities.
It's very it's very easy to see this
going on. Guys, there's videos everywhere. Massacre of
all the whites, Christians,
the very people that they said would usher
in the age of freedom and democracy.
They know that wasn't the case, guys. They
fund the most radical elements in the world
very provably
because the people who are a little bit
less crazy tend to not wanna bow to
their interests. So they fund the more crazy,
and then they let them take over and
they just take what they pick up from
the ashes. Or rather, let them be destabilized
so they can benefit however they want. These
are very bad people we're talking about. They
put these people in control because they're also
bad people.
Since the fall of Assad,
as Syria girl writes,
girls are being kidnapped all over Syria,
which happens every time, guys.
Another Alawite woman has gone missing, part of
a series of likely kidnappings a few hours
after on a few hours on the serious
coast.
Now lastly,
you have a scene. Israel has now bombed
yet another hospital. So all of them, but
now again,
this is the
Nasir Medical Complex in Con Eunice.
This was,
as of the twenty third, has continued into
today. The reason it's important, Rami Abdul points
out the Israeli occupation has assassinated
Hamas political bureau member. So a member of
Hamas.
By bombing the surgery room at Nasir Hospital.
Now, this is a really interesting point about
just like we're dealing with in the constitutional
rights aspect of Khalil and the Venezuelan gang,
the reason it's a similar point
is because even though this was a Hamas
member,
this is still a provable
crime. This this is a war crime.
Because as we understand it, regardless of whether
you care about that or want it to
be the case, it is the case that
even if one of the people you're fighting
is in is it like, he's getting medical
treatment,
then that is off limits. It's very simple.
Now whether or not you agree with it,
that's the point. It is the reality.
So they bombed an entire hospital, killing a
lot of innocent people because they claimed he
was there. But guess what? That's been their
excuse the whole time. And the whole time,
it's been a crime.
Very easily proven. You just got a lot
of radical maniacs out there acting like they're
fighting radical maniacs.
And it says where he was receiving treatment
for critical injuries sustained in a previous strike.
Jeremy,
Skahill
reporting this saying this is them bombing this
is just showing you more evidence of what's
happening in the hospital. Really just showing you
that there's a whole bunch of innocent people
wrapped up in all of it, which is
always how this goes. And Jeremy just says
this is horrifying.
Nobody cares.
On top of that, the same time, this
was as of the twenty fourth, they have
now blown up three more mosques. You know,
for no reason, just because they hate Palestinians.
Israeli air strikes completely destroyed three mosques.
None of which were like, as always, they
should prove that this was it. They're just
destroying infrastructure. They have been the entire time.
Now in case
you weren't killed when they bombed the hospital,
here's what happens to doctors that get taken
because they do. They take them as well
because they wanna get rid of people that
have this profession. That's been pretty clear. They've
even stated that in some cases.
The lawyer of doctor Hussam Abu Safia describes
the harsh conditions
and the torture, the beatings that he and
other detainees face in Israeli prisons, including breaking
his bones.
They and this is the guy from before,
so they broke his hands on purpose so
he could not continue to help people.
Lastly, here's Haaretz, leading Israeli newspaper. Netanyahu has
turned violently against the majority of the public.
Sounds something like sounds like we're dealing with.
Even his own voters,
making him a greater threat than Hamas, Hezbollah,
and the Houthis combined. That is an Israeli
writing for Harats about what Netanyahu is doing
to their country.
But let's keep pretending like this is the
best ally fighting terrorism for freedom. Right?
The truth has always been there, guys. The
evidence has always been there. The question is
whether you're willing to look,
willing to be objective, willing to put aside
partisan mania,
and just engage with what's factually like, just
engage with what's objectively clear.
The reality here is that everything we're going
over is so very important.
Chilling information about rapid changes or rather again,
it's always about lack of acknowledgment.
Your inherent god given rights are there whether
or not they care to acknowledge them. That's
the point. They don't dole out your rights.
They never have. They were simply outlining what
was inherent.
That's why it applies to even illegal aliens.
It's very simple.
The problem is they have convinced enough people
to think that this is something they control,
and in doing so, are able to remove.
And it's chilling or watching this destroy this
country.
I mean, again, even from my perspective, like,
if I'm of the mind that this the
idea of statism and the government itself is
the problem.
But to just simply destroy it all with
no employment, that's chaos. Right? It's not what
I'm asking for. The reality of what they're
doing is driving you into a position of
absolute chaos for their benefit at your expense
or rather for somebody else's expense. But even
if you don't agree with that, you know
you believe in the constitution.
Like, the people especially the people who are
supporting Donald Trump. That's what this is built
on. And so you have to stand up
and defend that more than anything because, again,
my point to what I was making there
is that if we're forced to live in
a state of society, this is the most
obvious and, in my opinion, historically,
efficient at in some way giving you power
to influence government.
Even if it's just through mob rule. Like,
the bottom line is they are trying to
change the system,
even the broken system that gives them all
the power to a point to where you
have literally no influence over the outcome, that
you have literally no say, no voice, no
rights, no ability to do anything outside of
what you're allowed to do within the context
of what they tell you is your liberty.
It's it's wild, and I know we see
it. Have the courage to call it out.
Thank you for tuning in today. I mean,
even if you completely disagree with everything I'm
saying, thank you for at least considering the
information. Thank you for at least going through
the source material and looking for yourself. That's
all I ever ask. Just take the time
to look into these things and consider for
yourself what it looks like.
In general, guys, as always,
this platform is under immense attack every day
in a thousand different ways. As you guys
might have noticed, we've had less written articles.
Derek is still writing some. Robert here occasionally,
but I've had to pull back on a
lot
because of all the lawyer's fees and all
the different stuff that we're dealing with. I
will be giving you guys some updates pretty
soon. There was actually I can't remember if
I already told you or not, but I'm
gonna go through a lot more coming up
soon. There was actually quite a positive development.
Either way, even the outcome of that, we're
looking at I mean, like, remember we talked
about the full thing
was estimated to be something like $50, like,
go to trial? Well, we've surpassed that just
in the efforts of pushing back. But in
one way, we had a very positive outcome,
but I'll get into it in an upcoming
show. The point though is that it's just
that's I think that's what it's all about.
Trying to drain your resources, trying to get
you distracted other things
because
you're having an effect.
What we're doing is changing minds, and that
scares them more than anything. So thank you
for continuing to support that. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Pop culture has touted Elon Musk as some
sort of eccentric heavyweight genius
with humble beginnings,
but this is demonstrably false.
Elon Musk was born in South Africa where
he claims he grew up extremely poor,
but his family owned an emerald mine.
As a teenager,
Elon would trade emeralds for cash in New
York City, and his father bragged how they
had so much money we couldn't even close
our safe.
Musk claims to have had about a hundred
thousand dollars of student loan debt,
but he received a full scholarship to the
University of Pennsylvania,
where he bought a 10 bedroom frat house
with his friend Adeo Ressi and ran an
illegal nightclub.
The pop culture claim is that Elon has
an IQ of a 55,
but this has never been tested. And after
being accepted into Stanford for PhD studies, he
dropped out after two days.
After dropping out, Elon began his first business
venture with his brother Kimbal, Zip2,
which was essentially a digital version of the
yellow pages.
The brothers received tens of thousands of dollars
from their parents, and yet Elon denies this.
An associate of Elon's father, Greg Curry, got
involved to bring in investors,
but Elon's code was no good, so they
had to hire on professional coders to rewrite
everything.
Zip2 was then sold for $307,000,000
to Compaq, who later shut it down without
ever earning a profit.
Elon made $22,000,000
bought a $1,000,000 McLaren f one supercar, which
made mainstream news before he totaled the uninsured
vehicle.
Musk then went on to create an online
bank, X.com.
He partnered with banking expert, Harris Fricker, Edward
Ho, and Christopher Payne.
All three ended up leaving the company after
accusing Elon of lying to the media about
the quality of their product.
Elon claims he founded PayPal.
Before the company was named PayPal, it was
known as Confinity.
It was founded in 1998 by Peter Thiel
and Max Levchin.
After losing millions of dollars,
Elon's x dot com was bought by Confinity
in a merger in February.
All Musk contributed at Confinity
was his own power struggle. He made himself
CEO
and pushed to change the name to x.com.
The executive team successfully petitioned to fire Musk
while he was away on vacation.
Part of Musk's resignation agreement stipulated
that all references to founders of the company
will be removed from their website, allowing Elon
to claim credit, which so far is all
he has ever achieved.
Peter Thiel then rebranded the company as PayPal,
went public, and sold to eBay for $1,500,000,000
Elon made 180,000,000
from the deal, which he then invested into
Tesla,
SpaceX, and failed company SolarCity.
Elon falsely claims to be the founder of
Tesla.
Tesla was founded in 02/2003
by Marc Tarpenning and Martin Eberhard, who developed
the Tesla Roadster.
When Tesla Motors began looking for venture capital,
they approached Elon Musk, who had the fake
credibility as PayPal's cofounder.
Musk joined with the condition that he be
named chairman of the board.
In emails, Musk was upset that the media
was not giving him credit for Tesla Motors
and went after Martin Eberhard,
replacing him as CEO.
He then forced Eberhard out of the company
and rewrote the company's history to have himself
listed as an original cofounder.
Martin Eberhard, the man behind the Tesla Roadster,
was promised the first Roadster off the assembly
line, but Musk screwed him over on that
as well and sent
that assembly line, but Musk screwed him over
on that as well and sent that car
into space.
You can tell it's real because it looks
so fake, honestly.
So who is Elon Musk?
Elon describes his father as being an evil,
abusive man.
His father, Errol Musk, has been accused of
being a pedophile
and fathered a child with his stepdaughter, who
is 42 years younger than him.
This spoiled narcissistic
failure,
son of accused pedophile,
wants to put computer chips in everyone's brain
so that we can merge with artificial intelligence.
His girlfriend is now bragging how how this
could all lead to a communist utopia.
And strangely enough, former Nazi and head of
NASA, Wernher von Braun,
predicted a man named Elon would conquer Mars
in a 1952
novel that he wrote,
which is odd because NASA has partnered with
Elon's SpaceX to work towards colonizing Mars.
Elon Musk, like everything else in today's modern
society,
is a fraud, a fake genius,
just like fake philanthropist Bill Gates and his
fake vaccines,
brought to you by the fake news.
Here's a pro tip for dealing with the
mainstream media and all of pop culture.
Assume it's a lie and research everything.
You can tell it's real because it looks
so fake, honestly.