Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last twenty four hours.
Sunday, March twenty sixth excuse me. 03/16/2025.
But sorry
to start with something so harsh.
Obviously,
not something we tend to really
I mean, half the time, I feel like
I don't even wanna show the most graphic
of what we see going on in the
world today. But I think it's important for
us to really
meet head on what just happened and and
what is really no big deviation from what
our government has been doing left and right
as far back as I can look and
as I've been doing this work.
But today in particular with what's going on
in the rapid
I was gonna say ignorance of our rights,
but this doesn't sound right. The ignoring of
our rights, the lack of acknowledgment of our
inherent god given rights, and actions that are
actively undermining,
dissolving,
diminishing
what we understand of those rights.
It's an important thing to see the imperialist
the the actions that our governments are carrying
out around the world. And
it's not a secret what this is really
about.
At the very least, as we'll go through
again,
there is no US interest in this conversation,
especially even if it was going after the
people they claimed they were going after. And
then even more so, even if they were
actually terrorists like they pretend that they are,
still, there would be no interest for the
United States government, let alone for the people
of this country.
But you just saw what's going on in
Yemen right now. Those are children. And this
is the same thing that you see from
Israel's wars or, you know, just when we're
the US government is fighting Israel's wars around
the world. But it's no different than the
other imperialist governments that we've talked about. This
is not a secret.
It's important that we engage with this honestly.
Otherwise, there will never be a true solution
to what we're dealing with. And the partisan
mania is exactly what you might expect. Now
today, I'm gonna try to do this in
this in a reasonably
shorter period for many reasons today, but in
in case you sense
some, you know,
the speed in which I'm going over this
stuff today. But I wanna start with an
important point about the update,
and there's been a delay and as he
points out because of things in his life,
but Scott Smith has followed up in regard
to his preliminary results around Colliners, Georgia.
Sadly, because of what's going on, I doubt
it's gonna get any attention, but I hope
at least it gives people and Conyers some
some
direction towards justice.
I also wanna make a quick point about
AI that we're gonna follow-up in a in
a upcoming show. The main point is to
discuss what's going on with Yemen right now
and the reality of the long term history
around it that very few seem to be
pointing to. And then, of course, a couple
of points around what Israel is also doing,
which is very similar to what we're seeing,
points around some of the partisan aspects of
the Israel connection, and then the focal point
around the free speech discussion from not just
Mahmoud Khalil, but the continuation of what the
US government is doing that just without question
unconstitutional.
It's it's a textbook example of exactly why
this is important. And now expanding it out
and and lying even more to push this
forward,
praising actions that are that would insult anybody
that is being honest about what this about
your rights,
regardless of the partisan side, regardless of the
personalities that are screaming about why you're supposed
to think a certain thing and why it's
all in the interest of our allies. The
reality of what you're watching is the degradation
of everything that we are fighting for, what
the people in the Republican conservative circles think
they're fighting for. It's very transparent,
and I'm hoping we can have some solidarity
around this and just fight it together because
that's what we really should be doing, fighting
off authoritarian control over our life regardless of
the flavor, the narrative, the flag. We should
care about the things we care
that we profess to care about. I mean,
this is such a frustrating thing to even
confront. The idea that we're talking about free
speech, and we all go, yeah. We all
believe in free speech, and then the most
obvious actions undermining, ignoring, destroying that conversation get
praised as the actions saving free speech. I
mean, this this is why we're always so
confounded with this today, talking about some kind
of cult mentality, left or right, or some
kind
of social engineering where we're not we're not
even talking about the same things. And it
it it you make it makes you wonder
whether or not what we're doing is even
the most appropriate way to try to reach
those people. I ask that question all the
time. It's never gonna stop me highlighting the
important truth, the important information, and the facts
for you to find that so everybody who
can see through it all can seek it
out for themselves and prove it, discuss it
for themselves. But we need to continue to
fight this because it seems there's something much
larger happening. But I'll leave it there. I
wanna make sure we talk about a lot
of these things today. And, oh, and one
quick note. Oh, it looks like it just
came through. Something was going on with Odysee.
I it I'm not sure exactly why that
wasn't ready. Now it looks like it's finally
loading, but, I'm gonna leap I'm gonna try
to get that done in the background. So
it might not be up right now is
what I'm saying on Odysee. But I wanna
start with this
in regard to
Scott c Smith.
Now he just put this up. This looks
like yesterday. He says, I have all the
testing results now coming in from my preliminary
testing in Conyers, Georgia from the BioLab fire.
I remember the BioLab being the name, not
necessarily a biological laboratory, but certainly some level
of overlap. And it says and I am
surmise summarizing now. The soot and ash that
fell from the sky, just like we saw
with
East Palestine,
contains significant toxic chemicals like dioxins and PHS,
exactly what they're not discussing, and they've never
even used the word dioxin in the conversation
of Conyers. At least we forced them to
discuss that in East Palestine. It says, I
will be reaching out to everyone where I
did testing over the next week to discuss
more details, and we'll be following up in
the next few weeks to discuss on the
podcast in a in a public forum. Yeah.
I I I I've
continued to support his work, and I'm I'm
hoping I can get him back on. He
never seems to reach out to me after
these things happen despite our conversations about how
he'll get back to me when he has
results. But I I'm not complaining. I'm just
saying that it's I I wish that was
the case because it'd be easier for me,
but I'd like to get him back on.
If he wants to get that information of
KeyLab's audience, I'll follow it wherever he posts
it. I guess the reason I'm saying that
is because he tends to lean into
the Cuomo,
tangent, mainstream media sort of, but I get
it. It's it it I think he perceives
it as being more reach. I ultimately feel
like it's more of a detriment to this
information getting out. Nonetheless, it's important to highlight
the fact, which is that there's a very
problem, a very big problem with the dioxin
issue around this that nobody wants to talk
about. At very least, at least those channels
will give him the time to talk about
it. But, also, I believe, somebody else you
know, the other reasons I have downside
doesn't matter.
Status quo, for example, has continued to discuss
this as well despite things I might say
about other things they've discussed. They've done a
good job on it, so make sure you
look for anywhere discussing this and highlight this
for Conyers, Georgia because they are still dealing
with these problems. And just like anywhere else,
it gets no discussion because there's no partisan
draw. And since I've been delaying in the
process testing results from Conyers, Georgia,
given the accident he had on January 7,
that's why there's been a delay. Fortunately, I'm
now to the point to where he's reentering
this and and will continue to follow-up.
So I simply said,
even though this will likely get very little
attention in the partisan meat mania we see
today, I hope this helps those suffering in
Georgia to get some justice. Doxone contamination is
significant according to that, and I'll include some
of the,
reports that we followed up with before October
10. Georgia dioxin risk, quote, six times greater
than East Palestine according to the results early.
This is John
Conyers, Georgia resident suffering prolonged illness on November
10. It was continuing. Following up on October
no. November 17, excuse me, a larger conversation
about what I called murder by malfeasance, just
dioxin contamination, and the ongoing cover up for
this country. So it's a very real and
obvious and peer reviewed science proven conversation that
the EPA knows about, that our government knows
about, the CDC knows about, that nobody talks
about.
I always say this, and it's always infuriating,
and it never seems to get any reach.
I hope we can make something I mean,
it's no different than glyphosate and all the
other things that we're drowning in right now.
On that note of
health, I wanna make a point about this
because I made this exact point, and now
we're seeing this this follow through, which is
RK came out and said we are beginning
the process to request that the FDA commissioner
begin to fall and okay. Wait. Nothing's happened.
I said the same. This is another step
in that right direction. He first came out
and said, we're going to call out and
try to stop the,
labeling of food and hiding bad things in
in ingredients. Right? And I'm not saying he's
not going to. I he seems like he's
going to, and I'm glad. But remember, he's
the HHS head. Ultimately, the FDA is under
his purview, but there's always push back and
forth and there's you know, they could doesn't
mean it's gonna change, especially if he's not
really going to do it, which is also
one of the possibilities. My point was saying
that was a good thing. Nothing happened. Then
he came out with this video and said,
I'm now asking the FDA commissioner to begin
this process. Okay. Good. Still, nothing's happened yet.
The ingredient stuff are still being hidden. There's
still bad things everywhere. Maybe in a week,
maybe in a day, it'll all change. Right
now, hasn't happened yet. So my point was
we shouldn't be cheering, yay, breaking news, everything's
happened, when it hasn't happened yet. And then
here we go the next day, even though
it wasn't breaking since we reported this two
days ago. Massive breaking news, Alex says. Funny
how it's always breaking news when they point
to it despite everyone else have already talked
about it. FDA to remove exemption that allows
harmful chemicals in food. Well, it hasn't happened
yet. It's not to happen. That's what's being
asked. When it begins to happen, when they
actually start the process, then we can report
it like that. But as usual, like he's
recently said, the Ukraine War is over even
though it's not. It seems like it's gonna
continue.
Make sure you're questioning these things, not just
following partisan narratives and people that get an
interest in selling you on what they want
what they know you want to hear. It
still may happen. I hope it does. I'm
not saying it won't. I'm saying we neither
neither of us know for sure, which is
how I reported that. Accurate, objective, nonpartisan. That's
how it should be. Now AI and from
and we're gonna follow-up on in a upcoming
show, possibly the next one. I wanted to
reiterate this conversation, reiterate from March 8 as
I simply highlighted the impending future of AI
government in a general sense,
but asking, you know, but who controls the
AI? That matters, the input of information. And
it I highlight really where it comes from
in this discussion, and it's not who you
think. Now I wanna follow-up and highlight a
couple important articles that we put out yesterday.
Part two, now you won't find this anywhere,
but TLAB Substack right now, I'm gonna post
it on TLAB both these part one and
two on TLAB coming up in the next
week. Medical surveillance part two, tracking the unvaccinated.
Now I'm gonna go into this in a
pre new coming show, so I'm not really
gonna go deep now because there's a lot
to talk about, and I wanna do it
justice. But it is it's crazy. Zoe, as
well as always, does an amazing job on
this. Remember, she's the the the coder. She
had the internal
purse like, remember, she called it, like, a
SimCity view of all of the different codings
of the country while she held the position
she did. And she was pushed out because
of the whole vaccination
segregation, essentially, or injection. And so this one
is discussing how this is continuing. We're at
a point now where this is the medical
surveillance was used to map out unvaccinated when
it wasn't necessarily the way it was supposed
to be applied, and now we see why.
And it's being applied in a social credit
digital ID way dynamic that ultimately is about
and points out that it's overlapped with Palantir
and their tech and drone surveillance dynamics. And
using this, the same 10 margin of error
applies on both these things. The discussion of
seeing where this goes, whether deliveries or even
enforcement using the AI infrastructure and drone technology,
It's terrifying, and it's all very easy to
back up. It's important that you understand this.
And she doesn't explicitly make it about Trump's
administration, which I'm glad because it will scare
partisans away. But the reality is obvious if
you just connect the dots. What she's highlighting
has been continuing from Biden to Trump or
rather from Obama to Trump to Biden and
now back to Trump, and it continues.
Make sure we're paying attention to that. Now,
also, Derek put out an absolutely outstanding article,
Doge. Is efficiency a gateway to technocracy?
Now I'm proud of this picture I put
together for it, which essentially is a picture
of of Taylor, who is the person behind
Taylorism, which is a precursor to efficiency in
the technocracy movement. And remember, Elon's grandfather is
one of the core people of Technocracy Inc.
I just so I just put Elon's face
over Taylor
of an image of where he was basically
rolling out this sort of, like, social credit
version in of Technocracy back then. And, ultimately,
where they decide for you how you live
your life, how you work. I mean, it's
it's how they designed this. And guess what?
It comes from some kind of liberal progressive
mindset from er
decades ago. Everything recycles, and now you've got
the Republicans driving in the same thing from
a little different flavor. It's how all of
this goes. It's important to read this.
And I'm gonna follow-up on all this in
this upcoming show, but I wanted to tell
just like we said with the AI governance
and the GSAI bot that's already running through
the government,
services administration,
This is another example. This is now coming
from March 12, and ranking member Conley demands
answers after reports that Doge is feeding Americans'
private data into unapproved AI systems.
Funny how we were saying that three weeks
ago. Same with Catherine Austin Fitts because we
were looking at the information,
and here we are, always ahead of the
stories, it seems. This is important. That's a
privacy risk. So much more than that when
you realize that it's not just Elon Musk
and his companies, guys. We are watching something
very serious happen, and all the screaming partisans
are high fiving about the smallest things in
the world. Going after people that scratch Elon's
Tesla cars that aren't even related to Elon
or anybody important. But it's a terrorist move
because they scratch something. Yeah. That's a crime.
Charge them. Give them a misdemeanor. But that's
what we should all be talking about. It's
crazy what's happening. This stuff is overtaking everything
and they're not even pointing to it. Or,
as which we'll relate to today,
state department to use artificial intelligence to revoke
visas of foreign students who, you know, appear
to be pro Hamas, which is exactly what
they're discussing.
That this is the this is exactly what
people like Brian Hyampak Flitz was just saying.
Just like with the gun conversation, it is
take action, due process later. He said that
more than once.
How can you support this if you even
pretend to believe in these things?
Now getting into the point to say to
start with Yemen, it's important to understand what's
really happening here and that this has been
ongoing for a very long time. Actually, the
very first interview I had with Whitney, and
I believe it was the very first interview
she had publicly,
well back before she this was back when
she worked with Mint Press News and was
really just writing from behind the scenes. And
I reached out to her, and I said,
your your Yemen work is outstanding. I'd love
to have you on to discuss what you've
discussed on Yemen. And it was such a
long I I I wish I had time
to find it real quickly. I forget exactly
what year it was or date
but it was an amazing discussion because she
was breaking down some stuff that I wasn't
seeing anywhere else. And it was showing exactly
all the things we're gonna talk about, the
reality of the illegal war, the regime change
effort, the the illegal US puppet, Hadi, who
was basically in Riyadh and Saudi Arabia that
they were trying to force back into Yemen,
and that Israel was immersed in this whole
conversation, same with The UAE, and this with
their torture prisons and all this stuff. And,
obviously, from there, her and our relationship built,
and she became part of T Lab, and
you guys know the rest. The point is
that this story goes back a long way,
and it's not just new for Trump's or
the last administration,
which is much we're kind of the mainstream
alternative media is trying to capture all this.
But Pete Hegseth comes out and says, godspeed
to our warriors,
which, first of all, let's let's reflect on
how obviously that's not what's going on. These
are not people marching in with their brave
warrior. They're pressing buttons and bombing innocent civilians.
That's what's happening. Hardly warriors, in my opinion,
whether or not they convince themselves they're fighting
for freedom, which obviously is not even what's
happening. As always, there is still a level
of respect for me, you can decide for
yourself, for people who are in this field
when they believe they're doing the right thing.
That's not to say that they are. I
think it's obvious that most people that leave
the military come back and go, man, I
was
snowed. I thought I was doing good things.
Turns out I was stealing from civilians
or ordered to rape people. These things are
all in our history. There's been court hearings
about all this stuff going back to Iraq.
The point is that there are people that
still think they're doing good for this country.
So my point is that's you can there's
a level of respect for people that believe
they're putting themselves at risk for the good
of the country. The point is that it's
still
worth pointing out that most of them aren't
actually doing good and most of them aren't
warriors by any sense when what they're doing
is drone strikes. And and cyberattacks is not
the reality anymore. So those two things both
count. Right? There's a level of respect for
what people put their lives at risk for
what they believe in, but realize the reality
of the warfare today. And he says Houthi
attacks on American ships and aircraft and our
troops will not be tolerated. Well, that's not
what's going on. K? We're gonna go over
the absurd game they're playing for their agenda.
Now think about the similarities to Israeli propaganda
today and what Israel's interests are in Yemen
as well and then what the Zionists in
Trump's administration are doing, lying to you as
they murder civilians on the ground for basically
no reason.
And and, overall, it's based on the idea
that they're somehow terrorists when they're the only
entity,
the popular support, which would be the government
if they weren't occupying Yemen,
fighting back against what Israel is doing. Like,
the only government and they're one of the
most impoverished countries in the world. Think about
what respect that deserves. And then we get
into the reality that, no, they're not.
You wonder why they're not talking about the
casualties? Because as far as I can tell,
there's none. They have actively gone after these
ships
and and tried to,
basically, hinder their efforts to deliver weapons to
Israel.
And, no, they were not going after every
ship, only those bound for Israel. And, And,
ultimately, the American ships were not the only
ones targeted, if really any. There was only
the majority of them have been something else.
And on top of that, I don't think
they killed anybody.
Now unless there's reports that I've missed, they've
and this this is what was broadly discussed
at the time when the peak of this
was happening,
that they were actively going out of their
way to make sure that didn't happen. Very
different than what The US and Israel do
by a matter of policy. But it says
freedom of navigation will be restored. Well, freedom
of navigation was never restricted unless they were
breaking the law. Now there's the conversation. Right?
Because the world can see a genocide being
committed, and the law is clear about who
supports a genocide. What's funny is they claim
that's not what's happening, so we're not breaking
the law even though everything they do in
an international sense these days seems to be
patently illegal. So funny how that game works.
Right? So they're gonna try to make them
out to be the ones breaking law when
the vast majority of the world sees that
what The US and Israel are doing pretty
much in a general sense these days seems
to be illegal.
America under president Trump will never back down.
Well, that's so clear because you're belligerent.
Might makes right is not the way we
should be living this
acting in a the twenty first century. This
is insane. They are belligerent, authoritarian,
and might makes right actors working for a
foreign government.
Most some of that is my opinion, but
the reality is clear that what they've done
historically has been violence.
Violence begets violence, and that's what they've been
doing ever since. Now he says, today, I
ordered the US military to launch decisive and
powerful attacks against Houthis terrorists in Yemen.
Now the game with the word terrorist in
general, guys, is it is a it is
a word used to manipulate.
There's plenty of descriptors other than the broad
terrorist they apply to whoever they don't like
that could be fit could
ever we have to understand how far back
this goes and how how this term has
been used to weaponize enemies of people. I
mean, it's not always the bad guys and
the enemies of bad guys, but just people
who want you to think their enemies
are the bad guys. Right? And so the
bottom line is they dehumanize.
Now that doesn't mean there's not people you
would picture as terrorists that are out there
committing violence for political reasons. And you want
the biggest examples of that in the world?
The US government in Israel. Not my opinion.
It's a factual,
very by metrics, you can prove that. That
they have and because you understand,
terrorism does not mean brown people in turbans.
That's how stupid this has become. It is
violence committed to for political ends. That's what
the actual definition is. So when they're calling
them terrorists, you show me where they're they're
carrying out violence specifically for political ends.
They're carrying out violence in the in in
pursuit of defending the Palestinian people. Now, if
you wanna
make that into just a political end,
the idea is about trying to fight for
a narrative, fight for the control of the
outcome of a situation as opposed to fighting
just to protect people. Like, if you wanna
pretend that violence to stop an invasion would
be terrorism, for example,
right, then then you have to make that
case equally, don't you? Right? So when every
when every single time in the past where
The US has claimed to fight something off,
well, then you'd call them terrorists, wouldn't you?
You see, there's a very clear logical line
here.
But what they're gonna do is try to
turn this into they are terrorists because they
are standing against our freedom, our acts of
liberty for the world when that's not remotely
what they're doing. Frankly, I think most people
are aware of that other than partisan screamers
that don't care about the outcome. This is
they have waged an unrelenting campaign of piracy.
Oh, have have they been just robbing everybody?
No. Pretty sure that's what the IDF's been
doing in every single field of war they're
in. In Lebanon, in Syria, in Gaza, robbing
and then posting it on TikTok. Right? They
are not. They are not robbing. They are
shutting down people trying to get to Israel
and then letting them go, but not to
Israel.
That's what's been happening. Violence and terrorism against
Americans?
Show me where that's happening.
I mean, I can show you a hundred
thousand reasons where we can see that happening
in reverse. Joe Biden's response was pathetically weak,
he says, so the unrestrained Houthis just kept
going.
It has you know, again, whether it's weak,
they took action too. So all they're really
doing is creating a false binary of Joe
Biden did the same thing but less, so
therefore, what I'm doing is good. That's the
basic reverse psychology of the partisan Republican side
right now. It has been over a year
since US flag commercial ships safe safely
sailed through the Suez Canal,
the Red Sea, or the Gulf Of Aden,
a US flag commercial ship. Now if those
US flag commercial ships are on the way
to Israel, well, then yes.
As it's funded by Iran now this is
this is the way they're this is Israel's
war. This is what they've been doing the
entire time. This is one of the main
reasons they wanted this area as I've shown
you a hundred times in the past is
because they know that the Strait Of Hormuz
is potentially a choke point that Israel or
that Iran can shut down
when they decide to officially go after them
in earnest. So that's why they make it
about Iran, and that's why they've been trying
to take control of it. And that's why
they've been in this engaged battle. And the
funny thing is, it's all for the interest
of Israel
and, really, for Saudi Arabia and the flow
of oil, but it's all in the interest
of what they're doing based on I mean,
look. Saudi Arabia is an open, despotic
authoritarian regime. Why don't we include that in
the conversation about the freedom, liberty you're trying
to deliver to the Middle East? Clearly, because
it's about selective outrage, and they don't care
about any of it. Houthi says have fired
missiles at The US aircraft, targeted troops and
allies.
Right? Even if that's the full picture, which
is not,
doesn't it matter whether or not the ones
they're firing at are breaking the law or
indiscriminately
bombing civilians?
No. I guess not. So US, internally the
good guy, just like Israel, eternally the good
guy. We're always the victim. Everything we do,
they're all the bad guys attacking us no
matter what's going on.
All these relentless assaults have cost The US
and world economy billions. No. No. They've cost
Israel Billions.
That's it. At the same time, putting innocent
lives at risk. Nope. Not one. I'd love
to see them show me the ones that
they put at risk, or rather the way
they play that is at risk. They almost
got killed. Did they took who died?
While you're pretending people died here, Israel killed
10 children. Let's keep let's keep a balance
here of what's going on.
Now realize the way they're trying to frame
this
is creating warfare.
Right? From the from the peace president, we're
told. Right?
Who's now waging fields of war all over
the place. All the ones he claimed would
stop.
The attack on American vessels will not be
tolerated.
Overwhelming force, he says, exactly like I always
point out. Not a measured response to get
what they want, but an overwhelming response because
they're in this is what insecurity looks like.
They pound their chest and will say, we're
the strongest in the world,
indicating that they're not.
The Houthis have choked off shipping in one
of the most important waterways of the world,
grinding vast swaths of global commerce. Yeah. Which
ones? The ones pertaining to Israel's war.
That's it.
Houthi terrorist. This is what he does.
He he's speaking to them. Your time is
up, and your attacks must stop. Starting today,
if they don't, hell will rain down.
Now he says the same. This these days,
that's becoming pretty embarrassing.
He said the same thing to to to
to Hamas. What's going on? I thought that
I thought if they didn't have the the
hostage back by weeks ago, you'd hell would
would start beginning. Well, yeah, it's because Israel's
been been destroying and starving and and
not putting cutting off electricity. That's been about
fourteen days now.
So their hell is hell for everybody, including
the hostage on the ground. My point is
this is belligerent
based on the idea that they don't get
what they want from a per group that
has every right, sovereign wise, to do what
they believe, which is support the groups that
are fighting against genocide.
I mean, really try to take a moment
and prepare and compare what they've been doing.
Not I mean, you obviously, someone with a
brain cell can see that what genocide is
being committed in Gaza does pale. What they're
talking about pales in comparison. But just take
the US government and look at what they've
done just in the last year and compare
that to what they claim the Houthis are
doing. Even if you take it at face
value, even though they're lying about it, it
still pales in comparison
to what they've been doing. Look at their
bombings in The Sudan. Are we really gonna
pretend like this is even remotely close to
what they keep doing?
It's insane that we can't have an honest
conversation about this, but this is why I
think most people are shaking free right now.
Now gen x girl also points out, guess
what? Trump lied, by the way, which is
not that hard to verify.
The US commercial ships have not sailed past
Yemen's maritime border since January 2024. No harm
to US cargo ships. But that's the only
way they can make these screaming partisans outraged
because they take the narrative. They at face
value, and now they're screaming terrorism because they
said
Houthi attacked ships to and from Israel's port
causing 85% drop in port activity for Israel
in the port of Eilat. That's Israel. That's
what's going on. That's the billions of dollars
they're outraged about is that one's going to
fund genocide.
US carrier group, 7,000,000,
million
dollar cost a day protects Israel cargo ships
for four hundred and four to four hundred
and fifty five days. US has bombed Houthis
on behalf of Israel
Three dozen times since November '20 '20 '3.
Now I will take note of the continuity
between Biden and Trump. Funny how he says
you're not doing enough. Well, guess what? You're
doing the same thing.
So the bet the only way they can
convince you that somehow they're not doing the
exact same policy is for Trump to go,
he was weak.
So you're basically saying, he did the right
thing, just not enough. You see, you can't
say it like that because that makes it
uncomfortable for people to recognize that you're both
doing the same thing. You gotta make it
sound like evil Democrats just didn't do the
right thing. You guys are the same thing.
That's the government carrying out Israel's agenda.
An estimated cost of $1,000,000,000
per campaign that they spent to bomb the
most impoverished country in the world, at least
before Gaza.
Our government's newest attack on was has nothing
to do with US cargo ships
taking cargo to and from The US. It
has everything to do with protecting cargo ships
headed from and to Israel
at American tax taxpayer cost. That's on top,
by the way, of the billions and billions
and billions they give and then the billions
they've given on top of that. In addition
to spending 40,000,000,000, that was my point, our
government also has issued more contracts for the
military industrial complex to replenish the munitions used
in the bombing campaigns.
If the concern is the is the added
shipping distance for US cargo ships headed to
and from Asian US, then our government could
stop arming, supporting, and fighting for Israel, which
would decrease DOD cost and commercial shipping cost.
But that's not what they're allowed to do,
apparently.
I mean, you ask yourself, even if they
believed in the idea, if they simply are
caring about the cost, well, they could simply
go look, Israel. It's not in our interest
to do this anymore.
And then go and it's also a genocide,
so, you know, we're in the right in
doing that. But nope. They will cut they
will spend more than they can to support
something that they shouldn't be supporting for no
interest to United States.
Somebody please bend over backwards and try to
make that America's First for me. I'd love
to see how.
See, Donald Trump says, your time is up
to Houthi terrorists.
The Ansaralla movement is what they're actually called.
Now this is why Trump hates Thomas Massie.
He came out on the tenth and said
the military industrial complex demands about 50,000,000,000
a year in war.
So as soon as we quit spending $50,000,000,000
a year in Afghanistan, we started spending $5,050,000,000,000
in Ukraine. Now this is a nonpartisan
agenda, guys. This shows you the real picture,
which is why it seems they hate this
person, which where which is where he says
watch where the next $50,000,000,000 a year goes
when we stop sending it to Ukraine, which
I don't actually think is gonna stop.
He says the military industrial complex is always
hungry. And then boom, just like that, he
goes, regarding US activity in Yemen, I recently
said to watch for the new military engagement
to compensate for the pullback in Ukraine, not
drop entirely, but the pullback. Right? The The
military industrial complex demands that $50,000,000,000 a year.
As I've said so many times over the
years, the US government runs on the blood
of other nations.
It's exactly what he's saying, just a little
bit less dramatic.
Well, as Daniel McAdams points out, what was
that about? No new wars? Was that about
the peace president? I mean, guys, let's pretend.
Let's it's it's actually embarrassing to watch these
partisans keep pretending, like, promises made, promises kept
because of some flimsy half measure that it
it's the smallest thing in the conversation as
he's literally beginning. And let's also make it
clear. This is not a new war, but
in the context of what the average person
sees, this is new.
Trump observed the air strikes from the White
House, he says. Now he is in his
golf shirt, golf pants, because this is how
this tends to go. He's being informed about
things that he didn't decide. That's not what
we were supposed to do. This is what
this is what he told you already. He's
given them the ability to make these decisions
without his authority, just like with Afghanistan and
the first administration where they use the largest
nonnuclear bomb for basically no just no real
benefit.
They they I showed you what happened. They've
murdered children on the ground.
These locations are civilian locations. Now ask yourself
why they would do that. Do they not
look into it? Do they care? I don't
I find it impossible to believe they didn't
know what they were aiming for.
No new wars.
But, of course, Laura Loomer wants you to
know that she voted for the guy who
plays a round of golf and then immediately
kills a terrorist when the round is over.
It's just it's sad that these children have
any influence in the conversation. The idea that
we're talking about a man who doesn't even
know what's going on, who gets informed about
murdering people for another country, and all she
can do is cheer about how he halfheartedly
jumped in and said, yo. Good. Do the
thing that you're doing already. Yay. I voted
for the guy who halfheartedly takes part in
the ongoing murder of children.
I I these are infants in the conversation,
guys. It's insane what we're talking about.
And I think it's obviously because that's kind
of an embarrassing moment, so they're incentivized to
make it seem like it's not.
Well, again, I called the peace president, both
no new wars, the other things that they
were screaming about before. Whereas RT says Trump
confirms powerful US attack on Yemen, and we
use overwhelming lethal force. Yeah. We saw that
already. Wait. You know, was this necessary?
Was it necessary to kill all these civilians
in order to basically accomplish nothing? I mean,
this didn't stop Yemen for what they're doing.
It only empowers them. They've made it clear.
Now Sarah Abdallah points
out today or excuse me. Late yesterday, The
US dropping bombs in civilian areas.
This is video footage on the ground, reports.
You can see. These are civilian areas just
like you see Israel doing every day.
This is the capital city of Sana'a. This
is like bombing Washington DC, guys. It's not
a secret. It's obvious what's happening. Unlike the
rest of the world, Yemen refuses to sit
back and watch American backed, American funded holocaust
unfold in Palestine, and this is what they
get for it.
Now as Suppress News points out that this
narrative they're spinning is embarrassing. Well, actually, I
think this I'll just move this up since
this is him what he's referring to.
The Houthis have attacked. This is Sean Parnell,
official account to the assistant of secretary of
defense and public affairs and chief Pentagon spokesman,
says the Houthis have attacked US warships a
74
times, and commercial vessels a 45 times. I
mean, these are complete fat like, what is
if you wanna show me a 74 attacks
on warships, you show me a 74
examples of anything that happened.
Did these ships sink? Did people get killed?
Or was it simply a hindering of you
trying to deliver weapons and genocidal action to
Israel?
You I mean, look, there's no evidence of
any Do you you realize what they've if
are you of the mind that they've attacked
a 74
US ships and nobody knows about that? I
mean, we've had some reports of this, but
you follow the reports, and there's no real
actual
fallout.
It was just simply some kind of attack
that only only hindered their their continuing, and
they basically were allowed to leave. Nobody was
killed. Nobody was arrested. Nobody was held.
There's been a few examples of things that
were seized, but nobody has been killed as
far as I can tell. The problem here
is that he's trying to make you believe
that a 74
times, they've bombed US warships.
If we're gonna pretend that they bombed a
single warship and that Trump wouldn't respond
or that anybody wouldn't respond,
you would have heard about that. It would
have been breaking news for a week that
Yemen bombed a US warship because that's not
what actually happened. It says they put American
lives at risk. No. No. Not at all.
Not not as far as I can tell.
Not a single time. The previous administration let
this go for years, and that's how they
play the game. Right? Biden didn't, so no
matter what, the opposite is the best. Right?
That's how childish this is.
But suppressed news says how the Houthis put
American lives at risk at more than 8,000
miles away from The US?
You wanna explain to us how that's in
some way putting Americans at risk or how
it's a national security risk? Because anything that's
stopping Israel's war is in the interest of
what they claim is their national security risk,
not Americans. He's not talking about this nation.
You understand?
Now Dan Cohen highlights
Osama Abu Rabe on the ground showing the
American and Israeli aggression on Yemen reveals their
true face of war as war criminals, showing
no regard for innocent life.
Now what's the argument here? Were these human
shields, guys? Are we pretending that they were
in tunnels? Like, are we just ignoring all
that? Like, at what point did we stop
caring that they're literally murdering innocent children on
the ground?
Did that just become war now? Or are
we I mean, realize, yes. That's always been
the true face of war, but they've never
made that it's always been crimes. They're supposed
to be held accountable,
but that's
now just normalized.
So if that's confusing, realize my point is
that our government has always been doing this.
You just maybe didn't know that, and the
government and the media have always been hiding
that. But since Israel's ongoing genocide, or at
least this current arm of it, they started
showing you that. Well, they couldn't hide it
rather. And so they said, human shields, and
we had the this is the most precise
war,
and then just stopped even saying that. Now
they're murdering children in Lebanon,
raping and torturing people in Syria, and now
they're bombing people in Yemen.
Children, civilian locations,
residential buildings.
Where's the narrative, guys? What all they said
was terrorists
hurting our our shipping. So murdering civilians is
the response?
Like, I don't even see an honest conversation
about this in any context. Not even where's
I mean, where's the supposed
adversarial party? Where are the Democrats? Where's the
CNN? Where why would I mean, some of
them are pointing out some of these casualties,
but not in the real context.
Not that this is a deliberate attack on
civilian locations that should be charged at The
Hague. This should be a massive war crime.
Even though we have a genocide going on,
this still needs to be acknowledged as a
war crime. Dan says there is no US
national security justification for bombing Yemen. This is
purely about punishing resistance to the Zionist genocide
in Gaza.
Donald Trump betrays the constitution, which he has
sworn to uphold. He demonstrates loyalty to international
Zionism,
not the American people.
As the US central command
I want you to take note of the
the similarities to Israeli propaganda.
And what I mean by that is is
the way that they and and, again, it's
not that new for US government, but this
very similar idea where they
murder civilians on the ground, and then they
come out like this. CENTCOM operations against Iran
backed Houthis. That's the game the game is
always.
Iran backed.
Well, Iran supports the ongoing resistance to Israel's
genocide. Yes. And there has been exchange and
and purchasing of weapons just like US sells
weapons to just about every despot in the
world.
But to pretend that they're just Iran is
the is Israel's lazy agenda that has been
disproven 17,000
times since they've continued to lie about it.
But they just keep going with it because
they're lackeys and and even the corporate media
continue to say it too. It's as simple
as that. I I it's infuriating how many
times we've had to disprove this this flimsy
overlap. I mean, to be clear, what I'm
saying is the way they try to make
it out to be like Iran.
Now Iran back is not necessarily inaccurate in
the sense that they support them, but what
they're the way they're using that is to
make it sound as if it is Iran.
Just to make that clear. Because you you
listen to their conversations, they they don't mince
words. That's Iran. Iran's doing this. So when
they say Iran if you're gonna make that
case, then you have to say, if you're
gonna talk about any other government in the
world that's buying weapons from you, then so
you'd say The US backed UK is bombing.
That's my point. That's stupid. Even though there's
obviously they do support them. You see my
point? It's about trying to link Iran to
something that's not actually what's happening.
Because that they're gonna make this about the
continuation of the war against Israel.
But as Fiora says Fiorella, excuse me, US
UK Terrorists brag as they continue murdering civilians
in Yemen and attempt to kill resistance factions
fighting against the Western Zionist genocide. And then
they post a bunch of these pictures about
the the glory of US weapons firing.
And as Sam Tripoli points out, we are
the terrorists of the world. Now, again, I
would argue the US government. We are not
the US government, but his point is they
are the terrorists of the world. And I'll
play this again. It's a bit graphic, so
prepare yourself. I played at the start.
Here's the White House post. President Trump is
taking action against the Houthis to defend US
shipping assets.
Okay. Well, let's just say that's the case.
Was that was that acceptable fallout for you
to defend US shipping assets?
Right? Were were those children responsible for what
they claimed the answer all movement were doing?
It's it's it's almost impossible
to argue with people that make everything okay
no matter what as long as their person's
doing it.
For too long, American economy and national threats
have been under assault. Yeah. Demonstrate that for
me. Show me exactly how their stopping of
of of US support for Israel was in
any way a national security threat or hurting
an American economy that other than your bottom
line or the technocrats and Zionists who are
benefiting from murder, like Palantir.
You wanna you wanna demonstrate that for me?
I mean, guys, this is a White House
that is actively fighting for terrorism.
Nothing new, but it's just blatant. That's one
of the things we point out about him
pulling the mask off.
Well, the other example
is not a new conversation, guys. It's not
this is it's so easy to do this.
And people always try to make it out
to be, oh, you just hate Israel. Guys,
it's not about let's just even say that's
what let's say the squirrel just hates Israel
and that's why. Okay. Well, then demonstrate for
me why this is a wrong point even
if that is the case. Guys, the reality
is the US government well, Israel and the
US government in many cases, but in this
case, Israel has been hijacking ships
for decades.
Have you heard of the fleet the Freedom
Flotilla? Have you heard of people like Joe
Meaders who's from, a USS Liberty veteran
who gets kidnapped by Israel on a ship
because they were daring to deliver things to
Gaza people we claim aren't an open air
prison?
This happens over and over and over. He
says for decades, Israel's been hijacking boats in
international waters, but specifically between Cyprus and Lebanon.
Not that they and there's no right for
them to do that. And killing or kidnapping
passengers.
Literally, they have murdered people on these ships
and not a peep from your national community.
Sometimes holding them hostage in prisons. One of
them was Joe Meters.
For months, it's I think it was months.
At the very least, it was weeks. I
can't remember exactly how long it went on.
It was a while. It was long enough
for I did multiple shows, and I said,
they've not said a word. Where's the US
government? An American citizen, a veteran no less,
is held in Israel's prisons with no charge
because
he dares
to
try to help put people in Gaza.
And he says, where's the call to bomb
Israel from the western media? Right? Isn't that
the same point?
No. See, it's only about their economic difference.
Right? So it's not about the law being
broken. It's that they're that there's an they're
they're suffering because of it. Law be damned.
We don't get what we want, then we
kill children. Right? That's isn't that the mantra
of The US these days? Well, here's Joe
Meaders who spoke up about this, and this
was the video they put out. But, see,
here's the thing. They recorded these videos
before they left on this trip. This was,
I think, 2,000
let me see real quick. This was
put out six years ago.
They they record these videos before they leave
because they knew there was a good chance
Israel would kidnap them. And guess what? They
were kidnapped. Here's what he put out. Joe
Madders. I'm an American on the twenty eighteen
Freedom Flotilla and its effort to break the
blockade of Gaza.
If you're watching this,
we've been
intercepted by the Israeli occupation forces and are
being forced against our will to go to
Israel.
Please contact your
representatives
in congress and the state department and ask
to have them demand
for Israel to have our media release.
Oh, and guess what didn't happen? Any of
that.
Only their groups were speaking up for them.
The US government didn't care. I don't even
think they mentioned his name. And you know
why? Because it's very uncomfortable for people to
recognize the history of The US's liberty. Once
you listen to him speak about it, it's
exactly what you know. Now this is what's
interesting. Yes. We see Candace Owens do a
did a good job on it despite other
things that worry about her other work. Or
recently, Tucker Carlson. Yeah. And and, redacted. Yeah.
They're talking about good. I'm glad it's getting
some reach. It's a very old and very
known story that the
Israel was behind all that, but I'm glad
it's getting reached to average people. My point
is,
are we now talking about the larger connection
here? Not just The US' Liberty point, but
the ongoing issue. Right? The idea of people
today who are actually still US' Liberty Veterans
who are being taken by Israel or any
number of overlaps. Right? It's important to know
that history, but realize it's not just history.
It's still happening.
That's the important thing about this conversation. Now
if we're gonna be consistent by the logic,
well, the squirrel's right. Shouldn't that matter the
same? But we know it doesn't.
And he goes on to make a bunch
of other points. Some of we've shown you
before. This is,
see, I'm blanking his name. I think he
says it in here. You guys know. I'm
you know, I'm familiar with him.
For some reason, I'm just having a blank
on his name.
Shoot. That's crazy. This is when anti genocide
flotilla,
last tried to break the siege, Israeli death
squads invaded the ship and killed civilians.
They were on a Turkish ship. We talked
about this in the past, and Turkish and
US citizens were among those killed. US citizens.
Some in the chat will say it. You
see him right there. God, it's crazy. I
hate when I do that. Things that you
know we've talked about in the past.
Chomsky, thank you. But, yeah, just very, very
important to see this stuff, guys.
I'll include the the link to Joe Meters'
video so we understand what's really going on
there.
Now I'll also include my just link to
Freedom Foothill that goes back a long way.
Within this I mean, look, these were happening
during Trump's last administration, but it's not unique
to Trump. It's it's a nonpartisan
reality of our government. But just to recognize,
this is not new. Gov Trump didn't say
a word about Joe Meaders or any of
the rest of the US Liberty veterans or
any other Americans or others that were kidnapped
or murdered by Israel on open waters. What
about that piracy, Trump? You don't care about
that? Guess not. Neither did Biden for that
matter. Well, Barak Ravid, the Israeli propagandist, says
US official told me Saturday strikes were not
the one off, but they'll start a series
of relentless US strikes against the Houthis that
are expected to last for days or even
weeks.
It's just it's insane to know what they're
bombing. People the peep civilians who have been,
in some cases, eating leaf paste because they've
been starved to death by Israel, by the
Saudi Arabia, by The United States. That's not
hyperbole. We've been see, this is my point.
A lot of people that don't even ones
now trying to make this about not just
the current situation are not including the decade
of ongoing starvation.
This was the most impoverished point in the
world for a very long time, and it
might still be. Gaza clearly, I think, is
is up there.
But Brian Grimm makes the other obvious point
here, guys.
Are we now pretending that there's no need
for congressional approval?
What where's congress crying foul right now? There
is no congressional authorization
for this war, for the bombing, but I
guarantee you they'll make it about some nine
eleven
Patriot Act terrorism connection to ISIS or whatever
they try to claim despite the fact that
I've proven to you 75 times that the
ISIS and Al Qaeda pockets in Yemen who
are perfectly encapsulated between Saudi, Israeli, US areas
have never stopped being there and have, in
fact, grown since this happened. There's not even
a border. There there the entire area is
is surrounded by US, Israeli, Saudi locations, and
they don't even have access to to the
border to the water. But yet, they come
and go as they please, apparently, and they
take care but we've defeated ISIS. Let's keep
screaming these lies. Right? Even though we know
it's an Israeli US proxy, it's what it
is. Now Clint Clinton Russell says the lie,
we're bombing Yemen to defend US shipping lanes.
Yeah. That's a lie. It is. The truth,
he says, The US backed the Saudis in
bombing Yemen for a decade, that is true,
and then backed Israel in the war on
Gaza, correct, which is why which is an
ally to Yemen. The Houthis attacks are a
a response to what The US and Israel
did.
It's pretty hard to argue that this is
defensive. Agreed. If anything, this is it is
is all in defense of Israel. Absolutely. It
says support it if you want, but just
be sure you know the circumstances
that got us here. Narratives at the outset
of war are always overly simplistic because they
only serve to galvanize support for the attacks.
So the reality the point in there to
not to dive further into is to understand
that this has been going on for decades.
But in earnest I mean, the ongoing
deliberate
blockade of the Hodeida Port, just like we're
seeing with Gaza and everywhere. It's not new,
guys. They block it. They that 90 something
percent of their food comes through the Hodeida
Port, which is the other side of the
landmass from the Strait Of Hormuz. That's what
the point is. They're controlling these two choke
points. They where they wanted to, and Iran
currently still controls the state of Hormuz. The
point is they starved these people to death
for a very long time. They bombed their
water infrastructure. They bombed their food locations. So
you got a lot of less coverage than
Gaza, but it's the same story.
So there's a lot there to unpack and
to understand that this has never stopped. It's
gone through multiple left and right administrations, and
they've all kept the agenda going. Now Trump
is just bombing
that location because they're still still standing up
against imperialism.
That's what's actually going on. That's not to
say we support everything they do or that
there's not ideological problem. I mean, the guys
every country in the world will have things
that people won't agree with or that policies
that we think are wrong. The point is
what they're doing, you can prove
what they're saying, what they're doing, what they're
accomplishing.
Your government just doesn't want people pushing back.
Now think about whether that comes back to
you at some point.
Now I'll include a link to just Yemen
going back on TLAB a long, long way.
Now here's one's here's just going back to
Trump's last administration.
US coalition kills 14 Yemeni civilians.
All and all but US recommit to nuclear
deal,
in regard to Iran and US tax here,
you know, just to give you the other
parts of what was going on at the
time. July twenty ninth of twenty nineteen.
This one, important, December 9.
Iran, false flag, you know, because they've they've
been doing that a long time. Bolivia's coup,
we talked about that many times, called it
before it happened.
And then it says, oh oh, this was
Bolivia's Coup Government, of course, was seeking Israel's
help because no surprise there. And Israel's been
in Yemen since, quote, day one according to
US information.
Nope. No surprise there, guys. This has always
been the same agenda.
Now 12/11/2019,
Trump signs executive order saying Judaism is now
a nationality.
See how long this has been going on?
It's not a new thing, guys. And it's
not, by the way. Judaism is not a
nationality. It's a religion. Zionism is what they
the the Zionism is what they're actually highlighting
right there.
You're an Israeli. If you live in this
location, technically, you should be Palestinian if we're
gonna talk about the legalities of it. But
two state solution is what everybody wants to
see accomplished, and I agree. But Judaism is
a religion. It's not a nationality, guys. You
don't suddenly become a a part of Israel
because you were born a Jewish person in
another part of the world. It's absurd. But
this is how Zionism is taking control. But
it says new toothless NDAA allows Yemen and
Iran Wars.
They've been building this narrative. It's not new,
and it's not for your interest at all.
Now, of course, in Joe Biden carrying this
on the same agenda with his meek policies.
Joe Biden is not ending the war on
Yemen,
Robert highlighted. You know why he wrote it
that way? Because he promised he would and
then didn't. Just like we heard from Trump.
No new wars, and he go right back
to the same thing.
It's amazing that we can't see through it.
Well, I get it. Maybe we all do,
and these partisan clowns out there are the
ones keeping it all going.
But Fiorella points out in regard to Syria,
Kumar El Masian really highlights JD Vance playing
their stupid games. JD Vance says the Christians
of Syria should be protected from the radicals,
and he blames The US for supporting the
theories.
Of course, Biden is what he's talking about
despite it being not a Biden dynamic. It's
been going on long before that. But see,
they that's how that you should be insulted.
That's how dumb they think you are, that
you can't just look, that you will just
blindly take what
this eye shadow wearing guy wants you to
believe. Just kinda kidding. His eyes do always
look like they're wearing eye shadow. The point
is clearly, he wants you to think that
this is just about what he's telling you
right now, and a lot of people mindlessly
follow.
The the sad reality, as you know,
this is US and Israeli supported.
As Israel further occupies Syria, Western backed ISIS
patch wearing terrorists begin executions. That was December
11 to the tenth in 2024.
That they're going it's exploding today. We just
went over that. And now they're all going
Muslims are bad. You mean the ones that
Israel and The United States have been funding
just like with Hamas?
Funny how that part of the conversation does
get included.
Right? So is it really Muslims are bad,
or are the ones that they're making to
achieve their goals?
So what Saudi Arabia admitted a long time
ago. The problem is that he's doing this
knowing what he's pointing to, or worse, he
doesn't even know that.
But he's the fear Ellis says JD Vance
doesn't give a damn about Syrians and is
using the death of Christians to build the
Zionist case against Muslims.
The Trump administration is the most Zionist administration
we give, and why give credence? This is
more fodder to shift anger against Iran and
Muslims
against Shia. And this is especially Shia. She
writes, this is using the ones that they
drove.
I mean, this is the whole thing about
acting like we need to stop the thing
or using it to justify your presence even
though we can prove that thirty seconds ago
you paraded them in.
And he says the CIA is responsible for
the chaos and Syria to begin with anyway.
Operation Timber Sycamore. This is not new.
I know most conservatives know this stuff because
they were the ones screaming it. So why
can't we apply it now?
And, of course, representative Anna Paulina Luna, you
know, all of which you're trying to deflect
away from the absence of Epstein files and
whatever else they promised were right there coming
around the corner. America should be defending Christians,
she writes, not giving aid to those who
persecute them.
Here's my point. Either she's that uninformed
or she's trying to deflect,
knowing that the people they funded are killing
Christians
or that Israel actively does the same everywhere
it goes. Yes. So in fact, we agree,
but she's actually not pointing to the reality.
She's trying to act like Muslims in Syria
are bad guys. We shouldn't be doing that.
Biden did, though. That's their lazy narrative. Well,
Genex girl points out, so you're saying to
support we should cut off support of Israel?
Yeah. We know that's not what she actually
means. Here's one of an endless amount of
examples of Zionists openly telling you that Christians
should be killed, and that will be a
mercy. Let me guess before you continue talking,
you're gonna go to jail because the police
here, 900% commission rate. Shut up. We don't
do anything illegal. You cannot take any shit
out. Just so it's clear, these are Christians
in Israel. This guy's telling you that you
can't exist.
If you are not involved, please go.
Shalom, my friend. We bless you. You're in
my country.
Why it's not me? You come to United
States, you can say whatever you want to
say.
Okay. That is the free world. Yes? You're
not in The United States. You're in Israel.
I understand. Say whatever you want to say
here. Yes. You can. It's illegal
it is legal
to preach about Yeshua.
We preach at Damascus Gate. The police said
it's okay.
Oh, see that's so you know, point is
funny how they always wanna speak about their
enemies, but here in Israel is where they're
getting pushed back about speaking out. I I
We preach at Jaffa Gate. The police say
it's okay.
Please stop.
The godly thing is to kill me. That's
right. That's what the Torah says. The Torah
says to kill us. The Torah says that
idol people who worship idols such as yourself,
when there is a Sanhedrin
To kill us?
Yes. Okay. That's what the Torah So we
know how the Jewish people feel about Christians.
Yes? That you discriminate against Christians. Christians are
idol worshipers. Discriminate against says that Christianity
is idol worshipers. Let me
Now the important thing to highlight, right, is
you can find a lot of very extreme
things in the bible too. The reality is
that the
I argue a majority of Judaism in the
world does not believe that killing Christians is
in line with their religion.
Just because, you know, this is the kind
of things that Laura Loomer will highlight and
make it about Muslims believe x, y, and
z. Well, the reality is that you could
find a lot of extreme religious dynamics in
pretty much every gospel every biblical or rather
religious,
book, I guess. But it's not hard to
see. And you wanna look just look it
up about some of there's some of those
great clips where they go around asking people
about these, you know, look at these crazy
things that we found in the Quran. They
go, oh my god. That's wild. It's like
that's actually in the bible. And they go,
oh. You know, it's it's just ignorance, guys.
That's how this is played. They always play
against the ignorance of people.
But the reality is simply to show you
that he believes that.
And they want you to believe that that's
you know, I mean, it's it's obvious what's
going on here, guys.
And well, so if the point is if
she wants you to stop funding people like
that, then why don't we include the reality?
Well, last point on this point, last
clip on this point, Michael Tracey's, just in
case you didn't see this. And it's this
is what's so embarrassing. Like, this is exactly
what I actually thought
because I'm it's I thought it would be
absurdly unlikely that he would end these things
on day one. Right? But all the people
were like, you're wrong. You're crazy. He told
you. And then now it doesn't happen. They
go, well, he wasn't really gonna do that.
Except that's exactly what you, like, aggressively push
down our throats when it was it's the
same game every single time. Well, here he
is, a betting that it was actually more
more, you know, sarcastic.
And now it's not gonna end at all,
really, is what it seems like.
Understating
the complexity of all this. But as a
candidate, you said you would have this war
settled in twenty four hours.
Well, I was being a little bit sarcastic
when I said that. I would,
what I really mean is I'd like to
get it settled.
And,
Well, then, I mean yeah. But then say
that, man. Like, that's not sarcastic. That's a
lie. That's dishonesty.
Like or or, you know, like, if you
just were saying I wanna eventually get it
settled I mean, I I mean, look. This
it's a small thing. Like, in fact, I
let's just even say in general, like, I
get that when when he first said that,
what did I say? It's probably just being
hyperbolic because that's what he always does. Right?
So it's not like I'm trying to say
that he leaked. Now he's caught lying. I'm
just trying to highlight the absurdity of how
this always plays
out. And if it had ended right away,
they'd say,
The point is people like this, you know,
just politicians, guys. This is what they do.
Now he's not a politician is kinda the
game as people try to defend their ideologue.
They're all the same. That's my point. Politicians
left and right will lie and tell you
what you wanna hear. Israel, Ukraine, end on
day one. Well, guess what? Neither of them
seem to be ending at all.
I'll,
think I'll I think I'll be successful.
What's the plan if Putin doesn't agree to
a ceasefire?
Which is what happened so far. Bad news
for this world
because so many people are dying, but I
think I think he's going to agree. I
really do. I think Yeah. Bad news because
we did it all. Right? Bad news for
the thing we all started and continue to
fund since 1948.
It's just I mean, really, what was it?
Nineteen like, you know, interestingly, times is pretty
much right around the foundation of Israel, but
I don't think they're necessarily immediately connected. But
you can prove that Israel has been funding
the Azov movement
for a very long time. But Operation Aerodynamic
was The US operation to build the fascist
entities that they see in Ukraine. They used
it against the Soviet Union. They're still using
it today. It's all very easy to prove,
guys. Exactly why Laura Loomer pretended to break
the story and left out the most important
part, which is that Israel is a foundational
element of what this is, and she did
that right before October 7. It's not hard
to see how this works. These people are
very, very dishonest.
Now
Israel, to show you some quick points, this
is what our this is what's going on.
So imagine going after Houthi rebels for trying
to stop this,
for not killing people, by the way, for
hindering their economic terrorism.
But meanwhile, here's what their chief ally is
doing. Cradle points out horrific scenes of Israel's
massacre of workers in Alkir Foundation, including journalists,
by the way, while they were carrying out
humanitarian work in Beth Lehiyah.
It never stops.
Bombed vehicles, journalists, humanitarian aid workers. Do you
know how many times this happened?
YCK Kitchen or WC Kitchen or whatever it's
called or any, you know,
World Food Programme, United Nations Unifil. I mean,
it's just a thousand different times where these
people have been targeted, and they don't even
try to explain it anymore. They just know
that no one cares, at least the people
with power to stop it.
Ryan Grim points out an unarmed Israeli Arab
was shot by a Jewish Israeli in the
street in Jerusalem. So not even a military
relation. Just an an Israeli Jew who just
murdered an unarmed Israel Israeli Arab. That's important.
With citizenship.
For no reason, with a crowd around chanting
death to Arabs and an Israeli judge just
let the man go.
Police picked up the Palestinian man instead and
asked him why he was out so late.
The judge
excused the shooting by saying people are on
edge.
You have to understand what's going on in
this society.
Now also understand there's people who live in
this society who fight against this. It's not
the majority. Understand that.
It's actually a pretty small minority, but it's
it's a good portion of people. So just
realize that it is not everybody. Not as
not every Israeli or every Jew, but very
clearly, the majority of Israelis and Jews in
this country are okay with this. And that's
because they've been propagandized for a century or,
you know, eighty years.
Although it says this was an incident in
which a weapon was used, I do not
believe the defendant can be deemed a criminal.
Now just for sake of exercising your, you
know, mental experiment,
let's pretend it was reversed.
An unarmed
an unarmed
how so the reverse would be an unarmed
Israeli Jew was shot by an Israeli Arab
in the street
for no
reason. And there was a crowd of Arabs
around them chanting death to Jews.
Look. Let's go ahead and pretend the judge
would be like, yeah. They're on edge. It's
okay. Right? He's he didn't he's just it
didn't mean he's not a criminal.
Or the reality would be that man would
be maybe killed or end up in prison
for twenty years with no charge.
Freedom. Only democracy in The Middle East. And
by the way, this is Times of Israel.
This is the this is the world, guys.
This is not hard to see. If you
have any shred of honesty in you, this
is what you can easily demonstrate.
Abby Martin points out today, when the rather
yesterday, Israel assassinated another three journalists in Gaza
for using a drone to film
the aid mission.
Nine people murdered total. That was the car
we showed you. Ceasefire means Israel still kills
with impunity daily. Because you realize, technically, they're
still under some guise of a ceasefire.
They don't care.
Brian Tashman points out Israeli media reports that
Netanyahu has sabotaged
a hostage deal
again
because he knew it would expose the fact
that Israel isn't interested in in rescuing the
hostages, but instead wants more war. Netanyahu also
demanded total control over the flow of information
to the White House.
That's from Times of Israel. Netanyahu,
Dermer worked to stop US Hamas deal to
free only American captives. This is the one
where the guy got released because he dared
to say that The US is not Israel
and that maybe Hamas is willing to take
the 67 borders deal. You know why? Because
they always have, and we've been talking about
it for years.
And then we also know that he funded
Hamas Netanyahu in order to make sure they
didn't have a deal.
But all these Zionist screaming liars are gonna
continue to pretend that they jade Jews and
they don't want any deal because they wanna
murder your children.
Meanwhile, screaming blood libel against anything that we
can prove.
This is insane.
And realize that Netanyahu is sabotaging a deal
for an American to go back to The
United States if that is any more important
to you than other people's lives.
Here's what it says.
The official also said Israel wanted to maintain
control over the flow of information
from Hamas to the White House.
And guess what, guys? They're gonna get it.
If you don't know by now, that's how
this works. You're not paying attention. Quote, it
became clear to us that Netanyahu and Dermer
are simply afraid it will suddenly become clear
to The US this is times of Israel.
Who wants a deal and who doesn't? Who
is reluctant and who is pushing for the
continuation of the war? Now that's the US
Official that they pushed out of the whole
conversation because he dared to be honest about
it. But that's the Times of Israel reporting
this. You're not gonna hear this in the
West.
Sarah Abdallah points out two days ago, so
now it's at fifteen days. For thirteen days,
when she posted this, Israel has blocked all
food from entering Gaza. That's true. Even the
people that they claim they wanna rescue.
It has cut off electricity, shutting down the
water. 2,000,000 people, half of them children, left
to die.
This is genocide in real time.
Rami Abdul points out that once again, the
Israeli army continues to spread lies and justify
its crimes to the world. So as they
continue to do this, this is the best
you're gonna get.
They not not any kind of, yeah, human
shield claim. They just blatantly lie about who
they are.
The army's statements attempting to justify the Bethlehem
massacre confirms its ongoing pattern of committing crimes
than fabricating lies to mislead global public opinion
with false accusations and exaggerating its so called
achievements under the guise of security operations.
Key inaccuracies,
which, by the way, you can prove. I
mean, this is this is Rami Abdul, the
chairman of the human EuroMed human rights group.
And every single time we've broken these out,
you can go to the website. You can
look at the breakdown of the information. You
have the people's names. You can prove who's
killed, who's not based on by the way,
also, that they've released the names of people
in general.
The point is the photo of Boleil Abu
Matar is incorrect. So as always, we've proven
this. They use images of people that end
up not even being the one they claim
they killed. The name of, Malmwood Slim refers
to someone who's actually still alive, so they
put the wrong name on the person they
claim they killed. And all this is in
interest of trying to convince you they're terrorists.
The one person, Al Najir, was not among
the victims they killed. The name for Mohammed
Al, Ghafir is actually wrong. And Mustafa Hama,
Hamad, labeled as an activist, had no ties
to the team at all.
So they killed him without even having any
connection. They don't they're just murdering people, guys,
and then just patching together narratives. That's what
Israel does. And they put out these flimsy
reports from the IDF with no information.
Terrorists eliminated.
Well, don't forget from the beginning, they got
caught having a list of everyone that had
been killed in Gaza, and the list was
terrorists killed in Gaza. And it was very
quickly confirmed to be just literally every person
that was killed, including ones they knew were
civilians. And that's also been proven by whistleblowers
that told you they've been just straight up
killing civilians. What? Four or five of them
now? Well, let's keep pretending like it's obviously
not happening.
Now here, we were just talking about this
guy. Here's Charlie Kirk. Here's what he says
to a Palestinian Christian, or rather just to
anybody listening. And I'll show you why he's
directly and I I I mean, especially if
you're a Christian like myself, this should be
wildly insulting that he deliberately tries to misrepresent
what the Bible says to convince you that
you're supposed to praise Jews.
That's actually what he's talking about here. Now
realize, I'm actually of the mind whether he
knows he's doing it or not is being
driven to do this to create the Zionist
hatred for exactly what they claim they're trying
to protect.
Either way,
he's lying
or he's wrong. And on top of that,
he's trying to say this for the interest
of what? America First?
Fighting for Christians? I mean, how how do
you frame this? And Sam Tripoli says this
guy is
r e t r e a retard, he
says. I just I hate that word. So
here's what he says.
How does Israel benefit us as a partner?
Well Oh, and just to be clear, I'm
I'm this question is so important, and this
is you'll never get an answer because there
is no benefit. So he what his argument
is is, well, you just have to praise
them because you're supposed to because bible says.
But yeah. Well, how about we answer the
question? How in any way does this partnership
benefit the government even?
And you could make arguments for that seeing
as how their imperialist agenda might overlap, but
specifically Americans.
As a partner.
Well, first and foremost, you're a Christian. Yes.
How do we know the Bible is true?
From the land of Israel. Palestine.
Okay. Before we get into the Palestine point,
what does that even mean? How do we
know the Bible is true?
Because the word Israel is in the Bible?
You mean it looks so dumb it is
to not recognize that
Britain gave the location
to is to Zionists?
And they and they and they were choosing
from multiple locations. So right there, you can
very clearly prove this was not god that
gave them the this was the government
who was giving them largely because Zionists were
bombing things in in in bombing British people,
bombing as well as bombing Jews to drive
them there. This is all very easy to
prove. The reality is they chose to name
it Israel because of the biblical connection, because
the game was to trick these people. At
the very least, it's not just because they
chose the name. It's not therefore prove that
it is the bib like, the Israel word
from the bible. On top of that, what
he just said right there is absolutely ridiculous
to me.
True. Palestine is true.
That was true.
How do we know the bible is true?
Even if you wanna pretend that the word
is there because somehow we know it's the
Israel from the bible, I mean, are we
really of the mind that the Bible is
just straight truth?
I mean, are we really that childish today,
guys? We have to realize that a lot
of what's in this book is metaphorical, and
on top of that has been handed down
through men who have been manipulative.
I mean, realize even going back to the
original I'm blanking on the name of it.
You know, it's a that's a it's a
very important historical event. You know, I forget
the name of it, where they all basically
gathered around and decided what gospels were going
to be added and what would be left
out. But realize even then, the point was
very clearly driven in the agenda of interest
of the church because
they're the gospels were just as they were
other people that were existing alongside them that
wrote their version of what happened. And many
of them that were ignored were the ones
that leaned into the idea that you don't
need to go to church every day, that
god is everywhere. It's I I think that
one of the famous lines is lift a
stone and you will find him, split a
piece of wood, and he is there. And
that's well, we don't want that included. Well,
because that indicates that you don't need to
go you could just exist and believe in
god. Well, that's not in the interest of
the church. So all I'm saying, as a
Christian who's looked into these things, is that
to pretend that it's just absolute truth seems
wildly naive to me and seems to be
in the interest of something else. But on
top of that, the idea to pretend that
because the word Israel is there, therefore, that
is the truth. Guys, this is just insane
to me. Now you conservatives and Republicans out
there who are screaming America First, rightly so,
and are talking about the idea of,
you know, like, even this interesting battle right
now, Christ is king and what they're like,
Jewish people coming out and arguing the bible
should be labeled anti Semitic.
That's real, by the way. I it's just
this is absolutely I don't know how people
aren't seeing this division tactic and how clearly
this is being driven by Zionism at the
very least. It's not America First.
Well, first and foremost, you're a Christian. Yes.
How do we know the bible is true?
From the land of Israel. Palestine.
The Again, let's see. That's the point, though.
Palestine is what this location originally is was.
It's not Palestine.
You want me to put British Palestine? Does
that help? State. Well, as
Christian so are you Armenian Christian? No. I'm
I'm actually Palestinian.
Is it funny how you you try to
draw lines already? Like, oh, you're one of
those kind? Like, you guys are just gross.
It's just this supremacist mindset of everything they
do. I'm not talking about just Jewish people
or or even just Zionist. I'm talking about
people like this person who I argue is
a Zionist Christian, if that even makes sense,
but that's the point. It drives a level
of you're not you're not that's why you
people like Bloomer and Ben Shapiro calling other
Jews who speak out against what's happening bad,
disgusting trash
or any number of words I've shown you
use against them or shown them use, which
shows you it's about Zionism and not Judaism.
Same point here. Okay. In the case of
Christian Zionism and the threat of Christianity. So
what what and you're Christian? Yes. I'm a
Christian. Well, praise God. You already said that,
by the way.
I'm thrilled to hear that. So
but I think you can acknowledge
that we as Christians have to honor the
Jews. Do you believe that?
What an what does that even mean?
Why would we argue that as Christians, we
have to honor the Jews? I'll show you
what he's referring to, and it's a classically
missed
misappropriate or rather just taken out of context.
It's everybody is the point as it should
be obvious for Christians, and and I'll read
it to you myself. Thank you from the
chat. It's the council of Nicaea. That's the
council I was referring to.
I think we should honor everyone. People are
back at the end of the day. But
in our scriptures,
it does say that we should bless the
Jews
that, you know, Genesis twelve three, bless those
I will bless those descendants that bless me.
Oh, yeah. There you go, bud. So did
that say Jews or did it say everybody?
And we have a covenant with Israel.
Do do What are you what are we
talking about?
Do you mean the current Zionist Israeli government
on the top of Palestine? That's not the
word Israel from the bible. This is such
a disgustingly obvious game. Do you share that
as a Christian, I believe? So the point,
guys, in case we can have a little
bit of honesty here,
just to simply look this up,
The Bible does not command Christians to bless
Jews specifically, but it does provide guidance on
how to treat all people. Genesis twelve three
states, quote, I will bless those who bless
you, and the one who curses you I
will curse.
Funny how he can be so dishonest about
this in the interest of a foreign government,
which is often interpreted in the context of
supporting the Jewish people on the nation of
Israel. Why?
However, this does not mean that Christians are
obligated to bless Jews in a religious theological
sense. In the new testament,
Christians are called to do good to all
people and to take the gospel to to
both Jews and Gentiles.
There it's about spreading the gospel to anybody
who will receive it. That's the point.
And not to get into a religious point
here. It's not what I'm trying to do.
The point is about the misrepresentation
of what the Bible says from a person
pretending to represent Christianity.
Four, you could argue Judaism, I'm of the
mind that it's for Zionist Israel, but either
one is what he's doing.
I I think that's just disgusting, guys.
Oh, look. Nancy's back in Israel, by the
way. And if you get the reference from
mall rats, that kid is back on the
escalator again.
As the mountain surround Jerusalem, so the lord
surrounds his people from this time for forth
and forevermore, she writes.
What is going on here? What is that
the third time now? Why in the world
in the first two months, why would these
people be repeatedly visiting Israel? That doesn't even
make sense unless you understand what's going on.
I just think that's insane. Here's another example
of Nancy Mace saying, I won't be silenced.
I'm pretty sure I'm pretty sure nobody's silencing
Nancy Mace. Pretty sure she won't shut up.
But I think it's hilarious that they put
this that this is about trying to create
an illusion. I simply said funny to say
funny thing to say while you're the ones
doing the silencing.
And free free prints points out, same thing
I pointed out earlier to what Kat Turd
said. I have a % full faith in
Kash Patel and Don and Dan Bogino,
which isn't that funny?
God, this platform is so gross. So I
most definitely responded underneath this, which was and
how this platform is supposed to work is
that your responses are supposed to show up
close.
God, that's so and right when I looked
earlier, it was right there, right at the
top.
Watch. I just think this platform is so
gross in so many obvious ways.
I'll just do mine actually, that'll be easier.
Let's do
what did I say?
I misspoke.
I think that's what I said. Naivety.
Alright. Let's see if it pops up.
Latest? Hey. Look at that.
Ain't that strange?
Ain't that
strange how my comments don't show up beneath
the post even though they're there? Now look,
I'm willing to bet you you could scroll
all the way to the bottom and it
won't be there because we are being actively
suppressed on this platform.
Have you seen it? Do you see it?
In fact, it's got more engagement than almost
all of them too, which is also supposed
to be how this works.
I just wanna it's always important to point
that out.
Right? I mean, look. You can see all
the most engagement at the top. There's one
with the same amount, hundred and eight. Not
there, though.
I mean, do we need any more evidence,
guys? People are being suppressed and ignored and
and channeled away. People don't see your work
other than ones that get, you know, directly
linked to it. All I said was how
embarrassing for you. This is childlike naivety. Woke
right.
This is what it is. Blind ideological sport.
This is the cult of personality. It's the
same point.
I just I just I actually thought it
would be there since it was earlier, but
it's not. So that point aside. Free Prince
says, there's no more dangerous sentence in the
modern world than I have 100% full faith
in, insert name here. Not faith in in
idea, not trust in principles, but faith blind,
uncritical, unwavering in another human being. Faith is
a word used in religion, and that's what
we're living in today. The cult of religion
of the team sport politics.
These people are have faith in somebody you're
supposed to be constantly questioning because even they
could be wrong. Right?
No. Not for these people. That's why they
eat their own alive the moment they push
back on anybody they support.
He says, a stranger, a politician, a government
official, an agent of the machine, the people
that are fighting the deep state are blindly
having faith in government representatives.
You're being misled, guys. May why do they
know that or not? It's it's clear.
He says, this is a problem. The fundamental
sickness. People do not want to think. They
do not want to wrestle with complexity, with
uncertainty, with contradiction. They want a figurehead, a
banner to march behind, a team to pledge
loyalty to. They want to delegate their own
minds. At least, a lot a lot of
people have been driven there. He says, and
this is how civilizations corrode from within, not
through conquest, not through economic collapse, but through
the slow erosion of skepticism.
Right? The whole sort of lead the opposition
from within dynamic. You know, kind of the
idea coming from a com like, a socialist
communist perspective even though they pretend they're all
fighting that as they roll out the technocrat
technocratic
Taylorism idea that's the same. I mean, it's
just funny how these things repeat and recycle.
They just add a little different flavor and
you guys all bite at it and think
you're fighting the same thing that you're actually
building.
I don't think it's the majority, though. It
says though the quiet through the quiet surrender
of critical thought to authority, through the comfort
of certainty, replace the discipline of doubt. Right?
As always,
the biggest problem with the world as b
b b Bernard,
re shoot.
Bertrand? Bernard Bernard I'm blanking on his name
all of a sudden.
Russell Bertrand, there it is, says
the biggest problem with the world is that
fools and fanatics are always so certain of
themselves. Why why why is your people so
full of doubt?
Right? The ones absolutely certain of everything all
the time about the breaking story that turns
out to be false are the ones that
are the fools and fanatics.
Why people who actually recognize that there is
rightful doubt in most situations don't jump to
report what they heard that day.
But it says, how many atrocities in history
have been committed by men who had a
% full faith in their leaders? How many
disasters have been accelerated by blind trust in
institutions? How many generations have suffered because people
could not bring themselves to question those in
power? It's the same thing that Kat Durden
the rest would scream out the Democrats, isn't
it? They just pretend that their gospel truth
is the one you're supposed to listen to.
Our ideologue is the right ideologue.
It's lazy, and it's the and it's the
abdication of responsibility. Well put. Thinking is difficult.
Doubt is uncomfortable. Holding multiple possibilities
in your mind, weighing them, interrogating them, that
takes effort, and effort is inconvenient. It is
much easier to declare allegiance, to kneel at
the altar of personality, and to let someone
else carry the burden of truth.
But truth does not come from authority. Power
does not sanctify.
No man, no matter this, his title, no
matter his rhetoric, no matter how much you
want him to be on your side, deserves
your absolute
faith.
If you cannot hold even even the people
you admire to scrutiny, if you cannot entertain
the idea that they may be wrong,
that they may be compromised,
that they may not be who you need
them to be, then you are not thinking.
You are worshiping. That's why the word faith
is used. And worship is how you get
shackled.
Worship is how you become livestock. Worship is
how you the how the game is played.
And why is it never played in your
favor?
And why it's never played in your favor?
Do not pledge your mind to anyone, not
to politicians, not to bureaucrats, not to media
figures, not your saviors, especially not screamers on
part on platforms.
Think always for yourself.
Excellent post that should have a million views,
but, of course, not on this platform.
Not critical not critical thinking, not here. Not
for most, anyway.
Well, the squirrel says, what happened over the
past few days is just astonishing and shows
the power and control of Zionists over The
US over The US. Someone in Trump's orbit,
with his permission, got Adam Bowler, we showed
you this yesterday, the day before, to initiate
direct talks with Hamas bypassing Israel. The first
time The US has done this.
Bowler, who apparently did not get the standard
Zionist Israel lobby talking points drummed into his
head beforehand,
did what no one is allowed to do
and actually listened to what Hamas told him.
He worked on trying to get Israel American
Prisoners out of this out for the obvious
reason that they have all also have American
citizenship, and he realized something shocking. Hamas is
willing to lay down their arms in exchange
for the long term truce on the 67
borders.
This, of course, has been the position of
Hamas for decades, and it's easily verifiable. Consistently
refused by Israel because they want to genocide
and annex all Palestine, which should be obvious
right now. And the entire Zionist western media
and political class launders it for them and
presents Hamas as evil monster subhumans, whereas the
Nazis, antisemites who can't be respond guys, how
do we not see that? You can't recognize
the the it's like seeing the lockstep of
the world in COVID nineteen and then pretending
we don't recognize some interconnectivity.
Your media political apparatus is blindly in line
for Israel's agenda. It has to be clear
by now.
So so what happened next? Israel's military intelligence
unit eighty two hundred found out about the
direct contact between him,
Hamas and Bowler, and Netanyahu and his point
person for the for running their US colony,
Ron Dermer, became outraged and utterly horrified.
They decided Bowler must go as he acknowledged
the truth and was making noises that would
fundamentally undermine their genocide agenda, and that is
not allowed. They leaked to their US Zionist
media proxies like Barak Ravid and Jake Tapper
and that Bowler
was having direct talks with Hamas bypassing Israel.
And the entire western media and political class
Israel lobby assets were mobilized to begin a
hysterical smear campaign against him, which was completed
by Tapper on Sunday, March 9,
who had him on CNN for the sole
purpose of ensuring his removal. Mueller was doing
the media rounds to try to defend himself
and salvage his position, and he did so
by saying Hamas offered to lay down their
arms in exchange for the long term truce
and, quote, Israel is not an agent of
The US.
He also said the Hamas negotiators he was
in talks with were nice guys.
The next day, Trump came out, defended Bowler,
but his fate was already sealed. Just days
after Tapper interview, he was removed. Now explain
for me how you can't see that.
How exactly does Trump come out, defend him,
and he gets removed anyway?
So the president defends him and he still
gets removed?
Gee, I wonder who's actually calling the shots,
guys.
I don't know how this can get any
more obvious.
Now secretary of Rubio comes out and says,
Beijing is pressuring other governments to send Uighurs
and other groups back to China where they
will be subject to torture and enforce disappearances.
In response, the state department will immediately take
steps to impose visa restrictions on government officials
involved in these forced returns,
including the recent instance of 40 Uighurs from
Thailand.
I'm sure you can recognize how absurd this
would be. Not to say that there shouldn't
be a conversation about what China may be
doing in some cases to Uighurs that are
not in overlap of manipulation.
My point is that you could prove there
is a game being played here, but it
still does not justify the mass removal of
rights, at least in the mindset of what
I would apply from our American you know,
what we we pretend our American values at
this point. My point is it's important to
recognize just like we talk about here that
to broadly remove the rights of people because
of an act like, I still disagree with
them entirely. But you can prove that there
is an outside force manipulating from within, and
you I'll show you in a second. But
my point, though,
that that's a nuance that conversation we're not
gonna get into. The point is to how
absurd it is. For him to act like
he cares, which he doesn't about any of
this, while already beginning the process to forcefully
remove all Palestinians from Palestine.
That's why this is actually being pointed to.
This is what they do, reactive propaganda.
And as Brian points out, the Uighurs secretary
Rubio is defending are part of a network
of terrorists who are passing through Thailand to
join ISIS Al Qaeda in Syria and who
are now participating in genocide against Alawites in
Syria. Now that is a true point, but
I'm not gonna pretend that every person China's
rounding up in this mass arrest
are provably part of that. You may agree
that that is the only thing you can
do. Maybe you're right. I just disagree. I
always will side on the idea of your
individual rights.
It's the same point here. It's like them
scooping up everybody in a certain area because
some of them may be terrorists. That should
not be okay with you. Nonetheless,
there is a proven point here about how
that's being applied. And that was an interesting
divide, and it shows you what side your
government stood
on, usually on Israel's side or Al Qaeda
and ISIS of which their support
proxy
they run these as proxies.
Now the point was they're just saying they're
these are terrorists who make up part of
Hayat al Sham, a group they support, now
are also pointing out to make arguments about
why Muslims are bad even though they're funding
them.
The point, though, is that this is all
about trying to hide what they're going to
do. Or APAC tracker points out, Masad Marco
pulling a look over there with its appearances
as they do the same things. Over a
million dollars Marco Rubio has taken from Israel.
I think that should matter.
Ryan Grim points to this report, the UN
report, and the punishment promoted by Israel in
The US, the planned sanctions against the Human
Rights Council.
So in case you forgot,
the UN came out with a major report
showing you that Israel's raping people as weapons
of war. You know, the actual story, not
the big lies built by Israel that we
can prove are now not true. Here's the
same report from March 13. More than a
human can bear, Israel's systemic use of sexual
reproductive and other forms of gender based violence
just since October 2023. It is scathing and
documented. I mean, guys, we're really gonna pretend
like you prove this? They had debates on
live TV about why they should be raping
prisoners
in major like, think of it like on
Fox and CNN, having debates in US about
why they should rape prisoners from foreign wars.
That's what they did in Israel, and they
mostly agreed. It's insane.
So guess what The US does? Stands up
and goes, we can't support these guys. These
are terrible people. No. They side with them
and then attack the UN, try to call
it out. Typical.
Ryan Grim says this isn't funny, but sanctioning
the UN Human Rights Council for finding Israel
guilty of systemic sexual violence against Palestinians is
straight out of the onion. And guess what,
guys? It's actually not even it's not even
unprecedented.
They have done this before, and in fact,
they've even arrested people
because or rather
the person showing this resigned from the state
department, and they shut down the group that
was trying to call it out because they
were proving that Israel, at least in this
case, the representatives of Israel were raping children.
This is from a person from our state
department. We have to condemn the atrocities that
happen every day to Palestinians in the West
Bank. You mentioned sexual violence.
I was part of the human rights vetting
process for arms going to Israel,
And a charity called Defense of Children International
Palestine,
drew our attention at the state department to
the sexual assault, actually the rape of a
13 year old boy that occurred in an
Israeli prison in Muscovyya in Jerusalem.
We examined these allegations.
We believe they were credible. We put them
to Israel to, the government of Israel.
And you know what happened the next day?
The IDF went into the DCIP offices and
removed all their computers and declared them a
terrorist entity.
I think it is vital that atrocities not
happen to anyone, not sexual atrocities, not sexual
violations, not any kind of gross violation of
human rights. We are looking at a situation
where there is so much dehumidification,
where people are not seen.
That's, this person resigned in protest, and what
the US government did was continue to support
them. Now I wanna include some of this.
We're gonna go deeper in the next show,
but this is, again, to point back to
the original point of the AI overlap as
we get into the attack on free speech.
State department to use artificial intelligence to revoke
visas of foreign students who appear
pro Hamas.
Secretary of state Marco Rubio is launching an
AI fueled catch, catch, and revoke effort.
Think stop and frisk with artificial intelligence, guys.
Trump already said he endorses that. Let's not
pretend like this isn't obvious. To cancel the
visas of foreign nationals who appear
to support Thomas or other designated terrorist groups,
so whatever they decide to call a terrorist
organization.
Let's realize they've called Americans terrorists because they
are supporting or highlighting what the government is
doing overseas. I mean, they they discuss people
like
what's there's examples of independent media being labeled
terrorist by our government, left and right.
So this gets very disconcerting when you realize
where it's already going.
Who's
appears
to support Hamas?
First of all, we're talking about people that
by and large support Palestine who they call
Hamas supporters. And so right there, that already
shows you how flimsy this is, and they're
they're revoking people for that.
Let alone you that you are allowed to
support or think or say what you want
regardless of what they try to yell national
security about.
But it says, quote, we see people marching
at our universities and in our streets, in
our country, calling for it to fada. Right.
Resistance. God forbid we should resist.
As much as all these screaming partisans want
you to bring terrorism, Muslim. Nope. It's easy
to look up. And in fact, it's largely
about a resistance of of moral grounds. And
the point is celebrating what Hamas has done.
Is that what they're doing?
No. These people Marco's been caught lying like
all of them every single time they talk
about this. There are people you could point
to out there. The people they're going after
are provably supporting Palestinian
self determination.
And he says these people need to go.
They're breaking the rules, guys, if you care
about them. If you believe you have inherent
god given rights, they don't care about it.
And if you think that's gonna stop short
about people that are on visas or green
cards, you've lost the plot.
And a %, I've shown you 75 times
over that, yes,
the constitution,
your rights,
due process
is applied to anybody in this country, even
illegal aliens.
There are nuance points around people breaking the
law. Yes. But due process
is universal, and that's been roundly seen by
the Supreme Court and is in the constitution.
It is by the words itself.
Any person, it says
repeatedly. But today, you people screaming, they're fighting
for the constitution while actively destroying
it. Now I'm gonna go over this in
a future show.
This is crazy to me. The only reason
I'm gonna look into it later is because
I can't verify what this guy is saying,
and that's what honest people would do. But,
of course, Wall Street Ape shares it because
it's something they like. The crazy thing is
this guy is literally saying that in Arkansas,
they're stopping people and having them say, can
you read what's on that paper? Can you
speak and write English? If you can't, you're
gonna get arrested.
Well, welcome to the 2025
the world, the '20 whatever you wanna call
it, guys. We are living in secret police
Stasi dynamics where they're arresting people out of
their cars because they don't speak and write
English. Is that now required by this country
that you have to speak and write English?
If it is, then why don't we at
least make that clear to everybody?
See, the obvious reality here, guys, is this
is authoritarian
to a to a t.
And all of it and the idea of
trying to stop illegal immigrants. Okay. Fine. Look.
At what point do we decide that even
if it if the if what they're actually
aiming at is something we agree on, that
they can just ignore the way they get
there? Oh, I remember when Trump said that
the the ends justify the means.
Funny how that worked out, the very Machiavellian
under it's it's it goes against everything we
actually believe this country represents.
Now I'm gonna follow-up. The point is not
about that that is provably what's happening. This
guy may be in somewhat, like, missing parts.
Like, I I would like to believe that
it's more about that, which I would still
disagree with, being used as a marker to
then investigate and find out if they are.
But the way he describes it sounds like
they're being pulled out of their cars because
they can't read the writing and they're getting
handcuffed. That's what he said. I'll look into
it more. But what I think is the
craziest part and why I'm actually showing you,
Wall Street apes is all about it. We
need this in every state.
Oh, yeah. We need more authoritarian
control. We need more lack of of of
acknowledgment of rights. We need people being yanked
out of their cars who may even be
American who just can't speak and write English.
That does exist, by the way.
Or even if they're not, in what world
do we pretend like this is aligned with
what we pretend this country is?
These people are destroying this country.
Not the left or right country, but just
what we pretend this country has always represented.
It is absolutely insane.
And, also, just to include this, same kind
of point, Trump suggests media outlets will be
deemed illegal. And it's really not I mean,
it's a bit hyperbolic for the headline, but
you read it. That's basically what he's saying,
and I'm gonna go into it another show.
And this has to stop. It has to
be illegal. It's influencing judges. And what he's
really saying is that these media personality or
the but, like, MSNBC, he which he calls
MSDNC because they're they're children.
I'm which I'll tell you first, they're some
of the worst. Absolutely. They propagandize.
They lie. But guess what? That's protected under
the constitution. Well, I guess we forgot about
that. Right? So whether it happens or not,
I'm not saying he's doing it. But he's
suggesting that we should be making it illegal
for them to say and write things that
influence judge you mean media, journalism, or rather
just propaganda, but nonetheless,
protected. Now if you believe that's gonna stop
for left leaning platforms or how it only
may apply to left even though all of
them do it, you're losing sense of what's
happening here, guys. He is building this just
like with Khalil and the free speech,
using things that you momentarily think you support
to roll this away, to never we are
positioning this or he's driving us to a
point where they are going to be using.
Like, this is what I sense coming. I
mean, I'm watching things on TV, different shows
coming out. We're being primed right now to
accept a sweeping revoking of our rights for
some large event. I sense it coming. We've
seen small examples like this.
But if we're willing to accept things that
are blatantly unconstitutional because, well, the left media
platforms are criminals,
Oh, maybe they are. I I I flatly
probably agree with that. Doesn't mean that they
should be revoked from saying what they think.
If they're breaking the law, then charge them
with a crime that you think they're breaking.
To shut them down is exactly what I
think the goal is, and It won't be
applied to left and right. It'll be applied
to you.
I don't know why people can't see this.
I'd like to believe most can, but I'll
talk about this more coming up.
Now to end in general, I wanna go
over these points to show you what's happening
and following up on Khalil.
We just talked about this on the thirteenth.
US government's flagrant attack on free speech, Mohammed
Khalil, was just the beginning.
We followed up on the fourteenth. The demolition
of free speech is underway as partisan grifters
and sycophants cheer on their own demise.
Now some, some important points to make around
this.
Just like we've been telling you, which is
easy to verify if you stand back outside
the partisan lens, Alia Boonema from Electronic Intifada
points out that,
don't
forget, who actually laid the groundwork
for what Trump is currently doing?
Kamala Harris.
Those who perpetrated the genocide and dehumanized students
and citizens protesting against it. Kamala
Harris. Rhetoric her rhetoric here is indistinguishable
from Donald Trump's.
Now they'll never acknowledge that, at least the
dishonest ones in the team sport politic republican
side.
But if you're honest, you'll notice this, and
you'll recognize that it's a continuity
between left and right, which which shows you
it's not about left and right. It's about
control for something else. It says, this is
Kamala twenty twenty four. Read my full statement.
As much as they love to pretend that
they were all anti Israel, they were promoting
it just the same way. They just had
a little bit more of a narrative.
Yesterday at Union Station Washington DC, we saw
despicable acts of unpatriotic protesters and dangerous hate
fueled rhetoric. Gee, that sounds exactly like the
Republicans are saying on Fox News right now.
I condemn any individual associated with brutal terrorist
organization Hamas. Do I need to read more,
guys?
That flag is a symbol of the highest
ideals burning the American flag.
Should never be desecrated. Yeah. Well, it's your
it's you're right. It's been roundly ruled by
the Supreme Court and simply is your constitutional
right as Ron Paul has pointed out. But
funny how the left and the right are
on the same page about this. You'll never
hear that from the screamers on either side.
But as Ali, an honest person, is pointing
out, this is how it works. They're building
this agenda,
and they're using the hatred of the other
side to make you miss the major points
their major points.
Now here's a really unnerving clip that you
might not have seen.
How Maumen Khalil was detained.
As she writes, a guy wearing an avenger
shirt from an unnamed agency. Right? People that
did not present a warrant and did not
really identify themselves
say, we have you. They refused to give
their names, and it seems they have that
that that he has no rights.
Not to be read to him or was
arrested, nothing. His pregnant wife watches as he
gets taken away. By the way, an American,
despite all these disgusting vile people out there
trying to make it out to be some
secret problem. And I'm gonna show you something,
guys, that is gonna make you sick.
Also by Loomer, you wouldn't be surprised.
But this
is not what this country is supposed to
look like.
Now it's trust me, they've been violating these
things a long time. But we need to
acknowledge that this cannot be acceptable. Not for
a green card, not for a Visa, not
for anybody in this country that still has
rights.
This person does not announce themselves. They don't
show a warrant. They drag him away, and
you can see, you can hear in the
way that this guy is discussing this that
he has almost a stain for this person.
And he has he doesn't feel that he
deserves this. Those are my opinions, but you
listen to the way he engaged with this.
And we know he did identify himself but
did not show a warrant. So, obviously, they
don't think they have to.
You're gonna be under arrest. So turn around.
Turn around. Turn around. Turn around. Turn around.
Okay.
You guys really don't need to be doing
all of that.
She says my love for the podcast.
My love, how will I call you?
Of course, the point is he's being arrested
for speech as even the US government made
clear. Whether it's national security risk or whatever
you wanna call it, they made it clear
he did not break the law, that he
it was because of what he was saying.
I don't know how in the world you
can support something like that.
Hi, Amy. Yeah.
I believe Amy is the lawyer, I think.
Yeah. They they just, like, handcuffed him and
took him. I don't know what to do.
My wife speaking is the one they're all
trying to make out to be some terrorist
right now.
Okay.
And what should I do? I don't know.
Ignore.
I mean, imagine imagine this was your husband
and you were at a protest
against genocide.
Right? And you were trying to help people.
I mean, everything about this I'm gonna go
into a post in a second that makes
it even more clear. The reality of all
the lies they've spun about everything, and it's
exactly what I've been telling you. Imagine this
was your husband or your sister, your brother,
your wife, and they just drag him out
with no charge, no warrant, nothing, no rights.
Drag him out,
and then you don't even get to remember,
she she they moved to Louisiana. For all
I know, he might even be out of
the country right now. Never told her what
was going on. She had no idea.
This is the exact thing that we always
pretend we're fighting in other countries.
Wake up.
Let me ask.
Can can we get a name, please, of
of can we get your name? Back. I
understand. The lawyer is asking for your name.
Back, please. Over there. We don't give our
name. The lawyers We don't give our names?
That that that's actually ridiculous, guys. Unless we're
living in some military
circumstance, which is what I think we're what
this what this is.
They're required to identify themselves unless
their national security military operation, whatever, which even
then is just a BS sidestep
because these things are not supposed to be
circumvented by some claim the government creates that
is in their benefit. These things are supposed
to be universal.
These people are breaking the law. Your government
is breaking the law. Well, your government is
lawless in the first place. Recognize what this
shows you in this country. Asking for your
name. He she's saying they he's saying they
don't give their names. Okay. Oh, yeah. That's
right. I'll be taking immigration custody at 26
Federal Plaza. I'm sorry. Can you repeat that?
I'll be taking to immigration custody at 26
Federal Plaza. She said she said they're taking
him to 26 Federal Plaza.
Can you can you please specify what agency
is taking him, please?
Excuse me. There nobody they're they're not talking
to me. I don't know. They're not.
I I looked
over. Excuse me. The lawyer would like to
speak to somebody. Oh my god. There's literally
been running away from me. Believe it, guys.
This is this is The United States Twenty
Twenty Five.
I real I mean, guys, this needs to
be
chilling. Like, this can't just disappear into the
background.
Hey. Look at that.
Crypto Chiro 3,000 in the chat.
Can you please connect with Orwell and give
her the information to that account? I lost
connection with that one, and I'd like to
add that back to the pirate streams. For
those in the podcast, I he just jumped
into the chat, and I haven't been able
to access that one. So can you can
you connect with Orwell and give her the
login info for that so I can start
adding it back to our pirate stream?
This is just an it's just insane. I
mean, this this kind of stuff, guys, I
mean, this is why this conversation has been
more it's it's affected me more than most.
This is real. It's home. It's it's right
in front of you.
It's an indication of something changing more than
we've ever seen over at the very least,
showing you what's been changed a long time
ago. Now here's the realize this guy, Elal
Yacobi, is the guy that Bloomer was interviewing.
You know, they were just made they're all
building this ridiculous they're they're and that we
just showed you the the spaces where Interaction
Barbie and the rest were attacking. They're going
out, like, basically trying to find out where
the wife was. They don't they don't they
don't even know her name when they're first
getting into this. And they're already calling a
terrorist and why? Because and now
it is I can't it infuriates me how
they've been trying to go after this individual
just because they need to build this case
to make themselves not look like absolute monsters.
And she's an American citizen, by the way,
and she is being created into this. And
it's all built on absolute nothing. And now
Laura's claiming because she was at the protest
for Palestine that that's enough. Breaking story. We
proved it. She's a Jihad terrorist. That's what
she's now saying and claiming that she's unfit
to have a child.
Laura Loomer is the most vile person on
the planet as far as I'm concerned right
now. These guys, it kills me.
And and in that podcast I mean, the
SAS, they're literally talking about trying to find
them, trying to identify
where they are and find find her parents
because they have to be arranged marriage. Right?
Because no one in India,
these people are vile.
Here's what Caitlin Johnstone said when this person
says, this woman is not his wife. She's
just some random western looking woman. This is
what this absolute moron put out. That they
chose to read his statement.
No. No. It's his lawyer.
See, these aren't journalists, guys. These are Zionist
propagandists, and people like Loomer take them at
face value because they're also stupid.
Caitlin says, it's his effing lawyer, you evil
freak. She says who she is and that
she's reading a statement at the very beginning.
He knows that, guys. He chose to misrepresent
it. And, again, people like Loomer take that
at face value.
You're knowingly lying, she writes, and framing this
as a as a deceitful op to trick
white people into supporting Khalil using a western
looking woman because you're a racist.
Absolutely despicable.
And we already we already went over this
where she reads this off. This was the
original statement from the wife. Now here's what
Loomer says.
This is
yesterday.
Okay?
First of all, this person says, hi, Cash.
This and by the way, her her this
is her name. I mean, this is not
this has been information that was in the
article we showed you days ago.
It says, not a student at Columbia. Okay?
Marching at the pro Hamas no. Pro Palestine
rally that was organized by her husband. Yeah.
That's not that hard to wrap your mind
around, guys. She's there supporting her husband who
is protesting against the genocide in Gaza.
I was told anyone involved will be persecuted.
Is that what's happening? Anybody at this protest
now is being persecuted?
I mean, what what is happening right now?
How is this what we're dealing with? How
are people in any
any right leaning conversation not doing somersaults down
the street screaming about how crazy this is?
You guys are supposed to be the ones
screaming about the constitution more so than the
left. Right? And trust me, I see that
I and I think the majority of you
are calling this out. But I also see
a not not enough, in my opinion, of
that circle calling it out, going after the
larger Republicans who are driving this home.
Now I could be missing it, of course.
Trust me. I I think we're being played
on what's really being done here, who supports
it, but we need to make this paramount.
So this random account
highlights her at a protest.
Okay.
Laura Loomer,
breaking. Oh, breaking. Is it seeing as how
three people I mean, this is how dumb
this we are the meeting now circle is.
It's not breaking news. You just captured somebody
else saying it, and I bet you she
didn't even look into it.
This Khalil's wife confirmed
to be a pro Hamas jihadi
who participated
in jihadi rallies.
That's what she just wrote.
Now as always, I will defend her right
to be this stupid. I will defend her
right to be this disgusting person because that's
what free speech is. I also, as always,
point out, have the right to call out
how vile this person is in what she's
saying. To point at somebody who is at
a protest for Palestinian rights, which is verifiably
what it was, and to just make it
into pro Hamas jihadi. Then goes on to
say, now we know why why Khalil's wife
wanted to be kept secret,
but she wasn't being kept secret, you absolute
moron.
She is on video participating in her husband's
pro Hamas activities, as in supporting Palestinian rights.
This is what she says next. Maybe her
child should be taken away from her when
she gives birth.
I don't even know how to respond to
something like that.
How does any honest person with any shred
of integrity, morals, values
pretend this person deserves your respect, let alone
your engagement?
It is the worst thing I've seen in
a long time. Now I'm not talking about,
like, people murdering. I'm talking about in on
Twitter and the ongoing conversation
for these people to have I mean, and
then get
1,000,000 views. Now you trust me. A lot
of that, I argue, are people that are
just just like me. I'm looking at it.
That's one of the views. Or just completely
blown away by how what a cartoon this
person is. And I don't think she knows
that. Because you can look at the traumas
for yourself. I mean, it's insane.
Most of them are like, you're just you're
desperate. You're disgusting.
Mayor Blakely is always right at the top.
The way you people are are on a
whole ass witch hunt of an American citizen,
which she is, because you don't like her
protesting the genocide of Israel regime just continues
to reveal you have more loyalty to that
that foreign terror state than our own
constitution. That's I agree with that. But all
of that aside, the idea that because she
stood I mean, even if you wanna pretend
it's pro Hamas, that she's protesting for something,
which is our right in this country, and
she says take her child away.
Welcome to the woke right, guys.
The same thing. We're so now now we're
not gonna compare the idea of the left
saying take their child away because of whatever
woke dynamic you're we're pointing at. As always,
they're the same thing. Laura Loomer is like
the chief woke right moron in this conversation
who is literally showing you how easy it
is to connect those dots.
Mohammed and his wife are clearly unfit for
parent parenting as they are engaged in pro
Hamas activities on US soil.
She's literally rallying the main the the
I can't even think of a word bad
enough. The idiot mob out there who will
probably seek these people out, who will now
be reporting them to Kapte Kap Kash Patel
and all the rest of these people that
seem to be acting in Israel's interest will
probably go after her.
Here's a screenshot, they say, of one of
the pro terror rallies. Pro terror. I mean,
it's like saying terror, protest, rape dungeon, or
whatever they're saying in Israel even though it
turns out that they were safe and being
protected and being fed. And then, oh, yeah.
Over in Israel, though, they were literally raping
people and torturing them, but we don't call
that. It's hyperbolic
pro terror rally for something that is protesting
an end to genocide. You know, actual terror
going on. Her employer should be made aware.
Welcome to the woke right, guys.
Try to get her fired, take her kid
away for ideas.
Even if those ideas are what you say
they are, but they're not.
She works at a dentist office in New
York. Here she is beginning to dox somebody
yet again. How can she be trusted to
be to use sharp tools on the mouths
of Jewish patients?
God. No. God.
Like, I am absolutely
blown away by this person.
This is the worst person I've ever seen
in my life. I mean, my god.
Am I crazy? Am I, like if you
guys think I'm blowing this out of the
ocean? Oops.
Stupid subs, StreamYard. I mean, legitimately tell me.
Like, this I mean, because look. There there's
few times when I make it personal. Okay?
I don't know how anybody can look at
that and pretend like we should go yes.
Like, I agree. The logic is there.
I mean, everything about her statement is subjective,
assumptive, a lie,
blatantly racist.
It's the worst of human nature, guys. She
is she is the living embodiment of the
lowest common denominator.
It's absolutely disgusting.
Now the person she interviewed again to lie
about this whole situation says, breaking. New footage
from Colombia shows the violent demonstration
led by Khalil.
Look at the pure chaos the Syrian national
caused.
Oh, okay. Well, what he's trying to do
is just because people, I guess, are holding
flares, make it into some major thing. Well,
guess what?
There's a couple of people holding some flares,
I guess, or lights, whatever they are, and
then they all march by. No violence. Nothing.
A peaceful march with some flares in front
of them.
That's the best they can do. You realize
if that's all they can do, then they're
then that they're lying, guys. And we've shown
you all the other times they've been caught
lying, how this guy has been caught lying.
And as a sob MD says, where is
he? Where's Khalil? He's not even in the
picture. And where's the violence you're talking about?
And Gia Koby says, he's on his way
back to Syria. Also, if Gaza has no
electricity, how are you accessing Twitter? Oh, okay.
So deflection and lies. Right? Oh, so how
can he be in the video? Well, of
course, this is an older video, but that's
not what he's asking. Where is he in
the video?
He's not in the video, and they're not
violent. And, really, all you're really doing is
promoting a Zionist who's trying to get Americans'
rights taken away.
This is who they support, guys. This is
who they point to when they make their
lies. People like that. Now Joseph Cline points
out, as we've been showing you, contrary to
the mass psychosis, there is no evidence that
Khalil had any leadership role in Columbia University
Apartheid Divest. That the comp the accounts they're
pointing to. There is only evidence of three
things just like we already showed you, by
the way. He participated in peaceful protests.
He spoke publicly about his experiences as a
Palestinian
as a Palestinian
at the CUAD events. Not that he was
part of that group, he served as a
mediator
between that group and the university.
You can prove these things. You can also
prove that he was not part he was
not joining the group. He was existing at
a protest where they were a part of
as well as a lot of people and
acted as the mediator to try to find
some resolution for a thing he for the
ongoing protest against Israel.
Everything else is a complete grasping assumption. On
top of that, I still have yet to
see anybody prove that that image was actually
on Instagram. It's a it's an there's a
dead link and there's a screenshot.
Now look, you can't point back to Monda
Weiss that was referencing it before. So I
do believe there's some point where that group
was making those claims. My point is always
is that ultimately,
even if he said that, he has a
right to say that. On top of that,
he didn't. They said it. So, I mean,
even if it actually was said by them
on a post, why would it be his
responsibility?
It's the most lazy thing in the world,
and they had people that actually committed violence.
So this is an effort to try to
try to make it about speech while claiming
its violence.
We are watching the degradation of everything we're
fighting for.
Khalil's name appears to have been provided to
the Trump administration, by the way, like we
told you, by the connoisseinist
organization, Batar US, a group that has threatened
violence against pro Palestinian protesters and vocally advocates
for the ethnic cleansing of all Palestinians from
Gaza.
Batur has tweeted out, Our war is with
Gaza, not Hamas. They're public about this. This
is the group we already pointed to,
founded by Javitsinski,
a violent maniac. The people of Gaza
it says, Not Hamas, Gaza. The people of
Gaza, they reiterate. They were able to identify
Khalil precisely because he was not one of
the mass agitators.
See, the whole way this works, there's he
wasn't even one of the people that they
were at. It's they're making it about the
person who was the most effective communicator
for the reality of what Israel's doing.
It couldn't be more clear. And, again, it
was because a Zionist group was telling Trump
and Rubio and Pan Bondi to go after
this guy, and they dutifully followed suit.
Because Khalil was willing to show his face
and serve as a mediator, targeting him and
blaming him for everything any protesters ever done
as a tool that can be used to
instill fear that will suppress pro Palestine speech.
This isn't dissimilar to blaming someone who went
to the very peaceful or as they write
the peaceful January 6 rally
on National Mall that day for the most
violent rioters at the Capitol.
The point is, as we've already shown you,
there was groupings that were acting violent. I
wouldn't argue necessarily, in a lot of cases,
breaking the law
a lot of times because they were allowed,
but there were some that did violate new
property and so on. Nobody was killed despite
all the lies. There were no weapons other
than flag poles and whatever they wanna turn
into whatever they claim.
The point though is there are people that
were absolutely just milling around that were charged
with crimes. It's that's why we've always been
making the case.
You are doing the same thing to them.
Stop falling for it. The deputy secretary of
Homeland Security and by the way, that's why
they need you to be so rapidly anti
Democrat so you just ignore the facts.
We're all Americans being suppressed by our government.
That's the one line we need to draw
here. The deputy secretary of Homeland Security said
in an interview with NPR that they have
no evidence Khalil was involved in any way
with any violence.
Easy to prove.
Not because they said it because it's you
can prove it, but then they said it
too.
Nor even that he supports Hamas because he
doesn't, not at least vocally,
but that he should be deported because he,
quote, put himself in the middle of pro
Palestine activity.
That's a direct quote.
By the way, one of the most obvious
things that are protected under your constitution's right,
pro Palestine, pro anything for that matter.
This is the best they can do?
The only reason it's allowed to happen is
because Israel's making it happen, and too many
people are blindly screaming that it should be
okay. Not even close to the majority, but
enough.
Merely having a favorable opinion of Hamas should
not be and legally is not grounds for
deportation any more than having a favorable opinion
of the Khanism should be. Or the KKK,
for example,
which is we obviously should call out, but
have a right to opinions, guys.
As there's a thousand examples of this stuff.
And it says, according to AP reporting, those
who know Khalil deny he had any role
in distributing Hamas's Hamas flyers that were found
at the events. Now my point is the
same, though. That that's just a new point
for me. Apparently, they're claiming he didn't even
have any connection to those, which wouldn't surprise
me. It doesn't even matter. It's there this
is collective punishment. They're demonizing anything him for
anything that even happened a lot around the
area.
But on top of that, the flyers we're
talking about were simply discussing things that we
can all prove.
I've made this case a thousand times, and
even then, if you don't agree with it,
he still has the right to say those.
It's just it's
infuriating that we have to keep this ridiculous
game going whenever even what the worst claims
they're making are, he still is protected.
You're allowed to support what you want. Did
he break the law? Did he give some
actual did he send weapons to them? No.
And even then, he doesn't even support what
you claim he does. It's so broken.
Khalil has also spoken out against antisemitism
saying, quote, there is, of course, no place
for antisemitism.
But that that somehow wink wink means he
hates Jews according to Zionism.
As a Palestinian student, he says, I believe
that the liberation of the Palestinian people and
the Jewish people are intertwined and go hand
in hand, and you cannot achieve one without
the other. See, he knows Zionism is the
problem. That's why he's talking about rescuing them
from that problem the same way you'd rescue
Palestinians.
See, this is impossible for them to control.
That's why they have to shut this down.
If you have evidence that Khalil led or
organized the CUAD
protest,
had advocated violence, participated
in violence, or has said anything antisemitic, I
would like to see it. If you have
merely heard that he's done those things and
have never seen any evidence, then you should
be aware that people are trying to manipulate
you and turn your anger towards those who
are brazenly lying to you.
It it doesn't end.
Oh, see. Okay. Here's it's funny. This guy
is saying, here, evidence he participated in one
of the legal takeovers. Guys, are you really
this stupid? This is one of the protests
we're talking about. These people walked peacefully and
legally into a building and sat down.
And that's what they turned into, a violent
occupation
of the building. Fine. Then
charge them with trespassing and have them removed.
That's the best you're gonna get out of
that. That's your example of a legal I
mean, these people are grasping at straws.
Joseph nailed it. Oh, he looks like he
might have responded too.
The picture certainly looks peaceful, and your assertion
is that it shows Khalil engaging in anything
illegal is totally unevident. Yeah. Obvious. These people
are desperate.
Now, Stefanik, of course, comes out and says
promises made, promises kept. You know, the old
lazy mantra because that that that's supposed to
imply somehow that's all that's happened, even though
it's provably the fault the the if if
any of them are kept, the minority of
the conversation, which is pretty obvious. But they've
arrested another individual.
Now this gets almost even worse if you
can believe that. But Stefanik is all about
it because Zionism. Right? They're very clear about
that. But I said, yes. But promises to
whom?
Right? Obviously, is this a pro did Trump
promise to arrest people for speech? Pretty much
he promised the exact opposite, by the way.
And I think there is even a right
here.
He says, we must have missed the memo
when he stopped making the first amendment a
priority. Remember this executive order? January 20? Restoring
freedom of speech and ending federal censorship? Oh,
yeah. I guess we just moved on from
that one when Zionism said so.
But promises to Israel are the obvious point
here. And you can see going back to
Mark Levin openly just declaring that he will
stand shoulder to shoulder with Israel and deport
foreign Jihad sympathizers and Hamas supporters, both of
which are legally your right to do.
Not committing crimes, but supporting whatever you want.
The game where they play national security means
they can just demonize whatever they claim is
that problem, even though most of the things
they call terrorists are not actually terrorists.
But ICE arrest another individual who participated in
anti Israel Colombia protests.
Here's what it says.
Immigration so ICE officers arrested a second student
who participated in what they call anti Israel
protest. Now that's actually more
closer to the truth because very much so
there are there there are anti Israel Protesters.
My point though is that the protest is
a pro Palestinian protest. Many of them there
are adamantly in support of
like he just said, what they're talking about
is Zionism, not even Israel. They're not they're
trying to help the people in Israel. But
there are some that are very much anti
Israel. So I'd even at least say that's
somewhat more truthful, but even that is meant
to make it sound bad, evil.
But
participate in anti Israel protest, which even if
it is only anti Israel, is their right,
at Columbia
after a third student opted to deport themselves.
Now that's all the way at the very
last sentence, what that actually is, and I'll
show you why they did that
as they praise this, like some terrorist deporting
themselves because they're scared. No. No. I'll show
you what it is. It's not connected to
any of this. It's an Indian student who
just is outraged about what's happening and just
decided to go home. But it says,
Cordia, who is from the West Bank, had
a student visa canceled
in 2020,
quote, for lack of attendance, who was detained
by the agency for the outdated visa. Okay.
DHS and Cordea
was previously arrested said she was previously arrested
in April for alleged role in the protest.
Right. So a person with an expired visa
was arrested for something that's legally protected by
the constitutional rights, which would apply to anybody
in this country. Don't forget that. Whether they're
here illegally or not, due process and your
constitutional rights has roundly been shown. And I've
gone over this in, like, the last five
shows despite people probably still screaming the opposite
of the chat.
And it says,
but the New York Police Department told Vox
Digital that it does not have an arrest
record under their name.
Interesting.
Says, quote, when you advocate for violence and
terrorism,
which they were not doing, by the way,
that privilege should be revoked.
Okay? Well, it depends on what you call
violence and terrorism. When they're saying free Palestine,
no. It should not. And if you do,
then you're breaking the law. But it says,
and you should not be in this country.
I am glad to see one of the
Columbia University terrorist sympathizers
using the app to self deport. So now
they've labeled this other guy a terrorist sympathizer
because he supported a pro Palestinian protest.
Now what I wanna try to show you
is that they're trying to use this because
they need to build this narrative that they
see collapsing.
Now it says, to be clear,
the first amendment does not allow the government
to retaliate against anyone for their speech, ripping
someone from their home, stripping them of their
immigration status, and detaining them solely based on
political viewpoints as a clear attempt by the
Trump administration to silence dissent. That's the ACLU.
And that's patently unconstitutional.
Political speech, however controversial may some may find
it, may never be the basis for punishment
including deportation.
Now, of course, the ACLU and its own
rights have been politically driven
for political reasons for a long time. Doesn't
mean everything they say is false. Right? It's
just like anything else. People will say, oh,
the ACLU, you're a democrat, and just ignore
what they say. And that makes you just
as stupid as somebody who would blindly accept
it without looking forward. That forward. This is
partisan manipulation.
What they say is accurate regardless of whether
they have other agendas that may sway them
at certain points.
The problem is people have been convinced that
they ignore anything coming from what they perceive
as the other side, and it traps you
in an ideological bubble.
Here's what it says at the end.
Indian citizen,
Ranjani
Srinivasan,
used the new app
to return to the country to to his
home country, March 11, after the federal government
took away your student visa March 5 according
to the release. Oh, wait.
I think I misread that the first time.
I thought that was well, the point, first
of all so this this is this is
important to understand. So a person who chooses
to deport themselves based on something which is
legally protected is not something to praise.
What this says is Indian citizen, all the
way at the bottom, by the way. Because
see, they really want you to conflate this
in your mind as some other Muslim terrorist
is what all they're trying to pretend.
Use the CBP home app to return to
the country March 11
after the federal government took away our student
visa according to a new release.
And that's important. You wanna see why? Because
right now, what they're trying to paint the
picture for is how these people are all
breaking the law. They're all evil and so
without saying it, implying they're being put here
for malicious reasons
or that they're just misrepresenting the law,
which is when a US visa expires, it
means the visa is no longer valid for
travel to The United States. However, if you're
already in The United States, which is the
example we're discussing, you can still stay beyond
the visa expiration date as long as your
immigration status and I nine four record of
arrival remain valid. The visa expiration does not
determine how long you're able to authorize stay
in The United States. That is determined by
the custom border protection
officer at the point of entry time you
travel. In summary, The US visa expiration date
affects your ability to reenter The US, but
does not your authorized stay within the country
if you are already present.
Don't these things matter? Like, is is this
broad stroke, just everyone involved in this as
a terrorist is the most alarmingly dangerous thing
to what we pretend what the Republican side
pretends they're fighting for.
Jewish voices for peace, the group who put
on the Columbia protest despite them not telling
you that, a swarm of cops dragging away
a rabbi,
protesting the abduction of Khalil says everything you
need to know about the Trump agenda or
rather just the US government agenda because Biden
did the same thing. Trump doesn't care about
Jewish safety. It says he's focused on taking
away our rights to protest.
It's a rabbi.
So is it about Jewish protection, or is
it about Zionist protection?
This is Jewish voice for peace protecting
fighting for Palestinian rights.
Kurt Metzer Metzger
says, hey. That's why or, hey. That's weird.
Nothing's happened with the Epstein thing or the
JFK thing. Funny.
But at least they deported a guy who's
here here's here legally
solely because he protested against the most important
country in the world. Can you guess which
one?
Epstein
pedophile arrest counter.
Zero.
Simon Goodeck says the Trump administration has punished
more people for antisemitism
than it has for being Epstein clients. Let
that sink in.
And this is just funny. It's exactly what's
going on. This person showing, like, what's it
called? That,
advertising show, mad Mad Men.
And he's basically pitching it, and he goes,
look, woke ism, but for Israel.
It's like the woke riot, guys. That's the
woke riot. It's literally the most obvious thing
in the world. And I'll I'll include the
many, many, many, many examples of Donald Trump
openly telling you that he would do exactly
what he's doing today for Israel. It's not
a secret. AfGuardian says you have to protect
all speech,
not because everything is worth saying, but because
you need to keep the power to silence
people out of the hands of those who
would abuse it. Very well put. It's exactly
the point. And if you don't believe that,
then you don't believe in free speech. Simple.
Scott Horton says, I cannot believe the number
of people in my mentions bending over backwards
to justify the regime deporting a guy for
opposing Israel,
killing people.
Snap the f out of it. You were
free speech absolutist against the Democrats three months
ago.
You're next again.
Michael Tracy
says the deep state, trademark,
must be absolutely petrified by the Trump administration
using terrorism, trademark, laws to go after college
students who have the audacity to protest Israel.
Yeah. You know, again, I I plenty of
things I can argue where he is very
partisan. Doesn't change the fact that what he's
saying is liter is a perfect
critique of how dumb all this is. It
just I just think it's in his interest
because clearly it's about Trump. But, you know,
it doesn't matter. Still the truth.
And he says, you would think if anything
embodied the deep state, it would be expansion
of the national security state under the auspices
of combating terrorism. You know, just like we
all have been calling out for decades. Right?
But oddly, the definition of the deep state
now seems more likely to be finance industry
regulators and national park park service. It's like
it just it's whatever they aim at. You
know? We're shutting down the credit cards of
state workers to fill their gas tanks. The
deep state Democrats. Like, you guys are going
after individual stuff. They're they're not even touching
the actual
the real dynamic that we pretend that I
mean,
it's so I I I think most conservatives
see this. I really do. I I just
want to stop. I I could repeat this
the same thing. It's just the same point
about how obvious it is that we can
see it's not what they claimed. It's going
after you. As Sam Tripoli says, this is
pure effing madness. The United
States in The United States, they wanna outlaw
criticizing another country.
We've lost our minds. Here's what drop site
news reports. The US Department of Justice is
examining whether student protests at Columbia University are
over the genocide in Gaza violated federal terrorism
laws. See? Now they're just going after so
you understand what this means. Right?
If you're an American citizen
or born in The United States and you're
protesting there and they say you violated federal
terrorism laws, well, then you're that's they're gonna
charge you the crime
for protesting.
Why? Because, you know, national security.
Well, guess what? That doesn't matter. As much
as all these sycophants for the state, the
the very people pretending they're fighting the deep
state, are gonna scream at you for saying
national security,
it's
nothing nothing supersedes your constitutional rights if we
understand what this country was founded upon.
What they wanna tell you that, no. No.
We're gonna make it a crime because we've
decided that. We've expanded the law, mission creep.
We've continued to make the argument for Israel
that you're a criminal if you call out
their genocide.
Promise
that under his watch, we will no longer
stand by while universities
tolerate
and facilitate antisemitism
and support of terrorism
on their campuses.
Again, whatever they wanna call terrorism doesn't matter
despite the naming people terrorists.
Many, many, many, many times over the years
that we're not.
But even
then, the idea that you're having a right
to say and think what you want is
what's being attacked right there. And if you're
not honest enough to make that point, then
you don't believe in free speech. It's just
it's as simple as that. The worst of
the speech is what needs to be protected.
Otherwise, you don't believe in free speech. But
if you don't, make the argument. Let's have
the debate. Stop pretending that you believe this
is free speech as they go after free
speech.
The department's
recent actions, which hopefully you've seen at Columbia
University in coordination
with our law enforcement agency partners are part
of the You know, Israel. Administration's mission to
end
antisemitism
in this country. What does that even mean,
guys? How is that not what you all
jump on?
So the he he didn't say violent anything.
He just said end your opinion about this
in this country. Now even if that is
legitimately that you think Jews run the world
and you hate all Jews, you have the
right to think that. Say it out loud.
That's free speech. I have the right to
say you're disgusting for doing so. The point
is they're calling that people who support Palestine.
So it doesn't matter how you spin this
out. He's literally telling you that you're not
allowed to say these things about Israel
even if it's actually about Jewish people or
whatever else. Or it's anti anything.
So explain for me why you can be
anti Christian, anti white, anti the US government
in The United States country, and nothing happens
because free speech, but you can't be anti
Israel or anti Jewish person or anti whatever
that conversation is about or anti Zionism.
It's just as simple as it gets. This
is why I'm convinced that most everybody with
an effing brain can see this.
And this is why it's becoming so dangerous.
They're now trying to scare us away, which
won't scare this I'm until they come kicking
my door in, I'm gonna be telling you
the truth.
That's the reality. That's where we are. And
it's not about my opinion. It's about the
provable facts. It's about holding the line to
what we actually believe. Not the screaming narrative
from somebody on Twitter, but the truth of
what we can all prove together, what we
understand we believe in. To align,
not because they gave you an example that
makes you uncomfortable, but because you stand for
the worst while fighting for the best. That's
the only way this works with speech, guys.
Just last night, we worked with the Department
of Homeland Security
to execute search warrants from an investigation
into Columbia University
for harboring
and concealing illegal aliens
on its campus. Now you see how this
all connects back to the border conversation, the
state of emergency,
and Israel's desires, and the weaponized migration, and
how long this has been going on. They
have literally worked this right into the conversation
to where now they're in they're raiding American
students'
rooms.
Not not Visa students, American students. And by
the way, not arresting anybody, not taking anything,
was raiding their their their
living quarters
for that investigation
in 2025 in The United States. Aliens
on its campus.
That investigation is ongoing, and we are also
looking
at whether Columbia's handling
of earlier incidents violated civil rights laws and
included terrorism
crimes.
Oh, so it's not a violation of civil
rights to shut down your right to free
speech, but it is to allow people to
protest within their rights.
Right? Or or only I mean, how and
we've gone over this 45 times. If you
are unaware at this point about the body
of evidence from literally everybody but these liars
that show that not only they lie repeatedly
about what actually happened at Columbia, that it
was mostly peaceful, mostly Jewish people put on
by Jewish groups who were protesting alongside Muslims
and Christians and Holocaust survivors, and that you
had Zionist maniacs come in and throw things
at them, hit them with boards. And, yes,
some people responded, and in some cases, others
took action. Yes. We can see that. But
by and large, that's not what actually happened.
And here they are turning this in to
something that will shut down your Terrorism
crimes. For your con for for another country
under the guise that you're committing terrorism or
the investigation around it.
This is long overdue.
Right. Not Epstein files, not deep state stuff,
not evil democrats,
not Bill Gates or Fauci. No. No. No.
We're gonna go after Americans for saying things
bad about Israel.
Golden age. Golden age.
Let me be clear.
Hamas
is
a terrorist
organization.
Oh, that was necessary. Right? I'm sure we
were all confused about your lie about that
and made sure you said it really slowly
and made. Obviously, we know what they're trying
to cement by saying it's very important to
make us think it's all about Hamas even
though none of them are talking about Hamas.
They're talking about Palestine.
These people are desperate, and they are acting
for something other than American interests.
It has the blood
of American citizens on its hands. Okay. Well,
then let's talk about why Israel funded them
until October 7. Does that matter to you
truth seekers?
Innocent
victims. Yeah. A lot of them were Israelis
that were killed by Israel. Right? And also
people that were in Gaza that were bombed
by Israeli bombs that were protected by Hamas.
The well, there's overlapping. Right? It was what
was the Mahujahideem brigade? Was that the other
one that took some people? But groups that
were there, largely Hamas, that were using their
bodies to protect the people that were there.
That's not saying there weren't crimes committed, but
these are the facts.
Many of whom are citizens of this country
have died
because of Hamas's actions.
Yeah. You mean the ones that were killed
by idiot bombs? I don't know of anyone
that was killed in Gaza that was done
by Hamas.
I'm certainly wouldn't deny that was possible, but
every single example, including the ones that got
released, they shot dead in front of them,
or the people they bombed to death, or
the people they starved to death have been
killed by Israel. Your government knows that and
literally doesn't care.
Brian Graham says in regard in response to
this person responding to this comment this, same,
drop site news video,
Mirzata
Murtaza, excuse me, says, it seems like the
political compromise about DEI is ditching in the
general
in ditching it in general, but keeping an
extremely authoritarian and far reaching version of specifically
for antisemitism.
Like, you guys are being so I mean,
it's almost like you're like, I feel embarrassed
for you. For those that don't realize how
I'm talking about team sport, politic, republicans.
I don't think you actually care either. You
guys get caught lying for things thirty seconds
later that you all high five about. Like,
it just it's all about agenda control. The
point is you're fighting DEI, woke, and democrats
as you literally support the same thing in
a small, just focused for Israel by anti
semitism, which is probably what it's all really
about.
It is the same thing. It's hate speech.
It's censorship around ideas. It's the same I
get people fired for cons I mean, you
guys are the woke right. It's right in
front of you. As Ryan Groom says, can
any of the proponents
articulate
why combating racism or sexism, you know, what
the Democrats are pushing, is bad, but combating
antisemitism requires the righteous force of the Department
of Justice and State Department
because of, you know, because narrative.
If is it that difficult to recognize that
antisemitism is just one part of the same
con is this is that not racism?
So
one side is trying to use the claim
of fighting racism to shut down speech, and
you guys cried rightly so that it's a
problem. Now the other side is trying to
use racism to shut down speech, and you
guys are like, yay. Raw America. Freedom.
That certainly doesn't make sense.
Well, here's what's important, though. Let's make sure
we don't miss that right now, a random
white girl is scratching to some random person's
car that Elon made, and that's what we
all have to investigate. Right? Who cares about
all the other things going on that we're
murdering children in four different countries, but let's
make sure we hunt down this girl for
scratching on this guy's car.
I mean, that's, like, that's, like, on the
lower scale of what even the local police
would care about. Right? But let's make sure
the world conversation, this gets 26,000,000
views that we care that this random girl
is crash scratching a key into a desk
into a a,
what is Cybertruck.
My god. Please help identify this deranged anti
Musk mask hole who keyed a swastika into
a cyber truck.
My god. We are in the media now.
Hooray.
I just feel bad for these people. Like,
I don't even think they realize how dumb
they look right now. Jerusalem Post, Trump's new
AG nominee. He calls Palestine supporters
ignorant children. Right? So meanwhile, we're literally calling
not Hamas, but Palestine supporters ignorant children. This
was November 2024. But realize, these are people
in power
who are now going after you for speaking
against Israel, and they're calling you a terrorist
while they called you an ignorant child for
standing up for Palestinian rights.
Ryan Grim responding to what Glenn Greenwald said.
I I think I posted this earlier.
This,
yeah, you know, and just in general, I
realized I've gone way past my time today
that I was gonna try to go quick.
But just ultimately, his point is this does
raise the interesting question in regard to well,
I I think I'll quickly do this. The
point is about a foreigner
from Israel
has spent two years protesting so rambunctiously at
the US University to the point where he
was suspended for harassing and being threatening to
colleagues.
But nobody's calling for his visa being revoked.
You know why? Because he's an Israeli
with the right, not wrong views on Israel.
Right? Eva Frey, of course, says, can you
provide an example of any of the alleged
behavior? Funny how they're not doing that on
the other side, though. And then he does.
And then he does respond.
Perfect. And he says, you can read the
New York Times report on his behavior here.
Anyone saying but the New York Times can
find the identical accounts in countless other outlets.
See, he knows what's going on. His behavior
was unstable, deranged, and typically on video. Right?
Because this guy is is a lunatic, a
Zionist.
Anybody that brings their ethnic strife with them
to America needs to be sent back. This
is so insane.
These people are probably mostly bots, in my
opinion, are really bad people. He says, but
there is zero chance that Trump's homeland security
will deport a pro Israel Israeli no matter
how much the strife they bring to The
United States. Now realize, bringing their strife is
not the same thing as violent acts. If
you're committing a crime, charge them with a
crime. To deport somebody based on a crime
because you don't like it's the same problem.
Even if it's about a Zionist or an
Israeli. If they commit a crime, charge them
with a crime. What is this game we're
deporting people for speech? Why on either side
does that make sense?
There's already crimes for this, guys, but that's
what he says here. They're basically
zero chance they will deport an Israeli, which
I agree with. So as Ryan says, this
does raise the interesting question. For everyone who
says that anyone here on a Visa or
green card should be a polite guest and
not participate in protests, why do you make
an exception for this guy?
Shai,
Davidia. How do you say that?
Davidi?
Who protest nonstop
and even for himself suspended from campus.
Is it that that his position for pro
Israel is acceptable one? What constitutional principle is
that?
You don't I mean, there there no one's
gonna respond to this because it's obvious, guys.
It's a contradiction in logic. You're okay with
the Israeli protesting violently and getting suspended for
doing so, but you're you're
not okay with Khalil not doing any of
that because he's Palestinian supporter. But then you'll
lie about it all because you wanna get
rid of him anyway.
Lastly,
the US Baator group
is very clearly responsible for this.
As Alan McLeod says, more people should know
this is happening. Pro Israel group says it
is deportation deportation list that it's been giving
to Trump officials. This was March 14. We
know this is the case. It's already been
publicly acknowledged. He just right rightly so pointing
out. And don't forget, by the way, that
the dean of the school in Columbia
is the is a former you Israeli spy
who literally married the UN Israeli
head. Like, it's these people are it's obvious
what's happening here. Now at Candace Owens, this
is what I was gonna reference in general,
but it's in response to this, says the
ADL dedicates a page on their website to
their partnership with the NCRI
to produce reports on online extremism.
They orchestrate the Christ as king lent attack.
I just think it's interesting. This is all
coming very clearly from this the Israeli Zionist
side that's that's almost blindly supported by the
the core Republican team sport side of Trump's
administration that are rabidly Zionist, who are attacking
Christianity,
like, in plain daylight.
And yet all these people on the right
are acting like they're supposed to support Israel
because they're I mean, it's it's insane what's
happening.
But I think that's why this is starting
to implode because you can't hide this stuff.
These people are maniacs, not Israelis or Jews
in particular, but Zionists.
Now but the point here oh, and she
asked Jordan Peterson why you supported this.
But p PBT points out that asking thoughts
on why Trump is working with the organization
that's demanding the blood of Palestinian children.
It's fair. I I just talked about this.
They literally responded.
Somebody posted this saying there are names of
Palestinian babies that Israel killed before they reached
their first birthday. The list I've shown you
the list too. That list of children that
are zero years old that have been killed
by Israel goes on for, like, five minutes.
It's disgusting.
But our US responds and says, not enough.
We demand blood in Gaza. Again, the group
that's made it clear that their their fight
is with Gaza, with Palestinians at large. They've
said this publicly. They're the ones handing out
pagers to innocent Americans.
Pro Israel group says it has deportate deportation
list
that sent to Trump and Rubio and Pam
Bondi, and then they they go after Khalil,
the one that they were piloting.
You know, are they gonna speak about that?
Like, is you know, they still support Trump,
by the way, guys. Doesn't that matter that
Trump is working with a with a, like,
borderline actual terrorist organization that ties back to
actual terrorist groups in regard to
or earlier Zionist like Jabotinsky and earlier Zionism,
like the Lehi, the the Ergun party. Like,
these were actual terrorist organization. You could argue
that about Zionism right now if they commit
a genocide.
These people are literally harassing Americans because of
things they support
and are demanding children be killed in Gaza.
And this is what Trump is working with?
This is what he's listening to?
Here they are. Bashar join Bashar USA washing
join Bashar Washington DC as we bring pagers
to normal thing in time. That's what it
says right there.
Again, because they've already done that. Capos get
beepers too.
These are threats, guys. That's a threat of
a bomb. They're giving them a pager as
if it's a even whether it is or
not, it's a threat.
Because they gave they because of the pager
discussion of the what they did in Lebanon.
They keep joking about this, guys. These people
are literally threatening Americans.
And says we confirm that we also are
preparing list for of Jews to ban from
Israel.
It doesn't need to be any more clear.
It's about Zionism. Any Jewish person that doesn't
support the Zionist agenda is no longer their
ally. So how is that not how is
that about Judaism?
And as always, don't forget Fox News literally
just said,
hateful speech is not protected.
How is that not the woke right? It's
exactly the same conversation.
It says, Fox Harris Faulkner's,
calls a group of Jewish protesters anti semitic
and says they hate Jewish Americans.
He says many conservatives now scream anti Semite
the way that they complain the left screams
racist.
To demonize people who disagree with them and
avoid having to actually defend their views, they
are actually what they claim to hate. That's
Nancy Mace again. The anti Semitic leftist are
showing themselves as they do, like, the I
mean, guys, it is the exact same thing.
How you can't see this or why you
would choose to ignore it, I don't know.
Lastly, Donald Trump evokes. Now I've been waiting
for it to happen. I'm all you know,
my I hate how this game is played
where Trump is a is going to do
this.
Well, when he does, it will report it.
Okay? I hate that game, and it's been
reported three days now. Trump to invoke. We'll
wait and see. Now NBC reports yesterday, Trump
invokes the Alien Enemies Act,
a 1798
wartime law, because we're clearly at war. Right?
To deport suspected
suspected
Venezuelan gang members.
It's the same game as always. So whether
it goes after Venezuelan gang members or not,
as if that's the one of that's what
we should be declaring wartime acts for, because
we clearly, that's our biggest concern right now.
Right?
But the point is if you actually think
it's gonna stop with Venezuelan gang members when
they say
suspected, hey. They're gonna go after anybody that
they wanna use that excuse for, both the
left and the right, seeing as how it
won't just be used by a Republican administration.
The bottom line is this is being done
for the same agenda.
I mean, that's what I believe. Who knows
what he thinks? But how do you not
see the connection from weaponized migration to the
border to I mean, it's all the same
thing. You're deporting people. It's all the same
conversation.
And then, of course,
a judge an hour later blocked Trump from
deporting these migrants under the Alien's Enemies Act
and orders plans to the air
planes to the air to turn around.
So, again, we'll see what happens, but you
have to realize this is not. You can't
bomb foreign countries without congressional approval even though
we've been doing it since World War two.
You can't carry these things out without some
semblance of legal process. Executive orders do not
apply to the world.
Like, how how long have we made this
case apply to the executive branch alone? And,
yes, that's a lot of people. But the
way this is being done is unilateral. It's
dictatorial. This is not what we are or
at least what we pretended we are.
I'm just hoping people could have the courage
to actually call this stuff out.
Thank you for tuning in today, guys. Longer
than I wanted, but shorter than usual. I
have somebody waiting for me that's probably mad
that I took so long, but I thank
you for for tuning in today, guys. It's
important that we stay up on this and
that we're honest about this.
I mean, this of all things is is
a it is whether
precedent based or not,
are fundamentally changing at the very least the
opinions of Americans that don't know enough to
know that they're being played. And plenty of
others that go along with it for other
political reasons. And the sad reality is it
is changing this country
in very, very damaging ways. In fact, the
exact ways that they told you Democrats were
trying to, they're rolling it through with republican
agendas.
Whether it's the great reset, technocracy,
Zion. I mean, everything we've talked about. Everything.
Every aspect of the great reset, every aspect
of censorship, your second amendment. I mean, all
of it has been slowly degrading under a
different narrative, and all you can do is
point to, you know, dunking on Democrats and
laughing about what they're doing. It's it's distractionary.
Now when I say that, you, I'm talking
about the team sports side. As always, I
see all of you out there, which I
get is frustrating that people frame it as
the Republicans aren't doing something. That's why I
try to say that. I see you guys
out there. I see you in the comments.
I see you with the smaller Twitter accounts
out there that don't have enough, you know,
following to be even part of the conversation,
who are screaming, I don't agree with this.
I'm a Republican. I believe in MAGA. I
voted for Trump, and this is wrong.
So good on you for having the courage
to do that in the face of all
this nonsense.
Keep doing so. Stay the course. Stand up
for what you believe in. Don't just be
don't be swayed by partisan logic.
Fight for what you believe. Your integrity is
your principle. There's never been a more important
time to do it. Thank you for tuning
in, guys. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.