Really,
truly is the is the left right psyop.
Because at its base,
what it does is
every single administration
gets to set
a slightly
broader mandate
for the next administration.
And because it's always flipping from left to
right, you get caught up if you're on
the left, you're over here. If you're on
the right, you're over here. And every time
you get in power, yay. You see? This
is it. And finally, things are working out
and great. And then the other person goes
in power and it's like, oh my god.
They have too much power. And it's a
ratchet because it keeps going up and up
and up, but it'll never slip back down.
It just keeps ratcheting up and up and
up and up to the point where, essentially,
suddenly, we have this executive order dictator who
can do,
apparently, anything. I mean, we'll see, I guess.
We'll see if there is any actual judicial
kickback against these types of things that are
going on. Doesn't look like it so far.
And
and the the thing that blows my mind
is exactly like with the Musk thing. If
if you put it in the context of,
hey, he's hipster Gates. He's hipster Soros.
Maybe people can start to see, oh, yes.
If those people were doing this thing, it
would be bad. But Musk is doing it,
so I support it. It might, for the
few people who actually have principles that they
go on, that might get them thinking along
those lines. In the same way,
everything
that Trump is doing right now is going
to be used by the next d to
get into power. And you think that's, you
know if you if you're on the right
side and, oh, I'm a Republican. Yay.
You are going to in four, eight, twelve
years, whenever it is, whenever it eventually
inevitably happens. Oh my god. How can this
Democrat wield so much power? Oh, no.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last twenty four hours.
Saturday,
March eighth twenty twenty five. Thank you for
joining me today.
Definitely feel this is an important show. I
you know, you guys have gotten used to
my the way I formulate my title. Sometimes
a little bit predictive, kind of like what
I'm sensing in the conversation, whether it's, like,
a huge focus or not and, you know,
always somewhat of a focus or a point
that we make.
But I've done in the past, I've done
a lot of these words kinda like the
impending,
you know, something. The impending
regime change in Bolivia, for example.
Like, six months before that actually happened in
the last Trump administration
with Pompeo giving him the dead stare. I
thought that was very obvious and was just
my opinion. Right?
But
the re I'm starting with this because I
think it's important. One, just to right out
of the gate, you know, demonstrate our value
at the Last American Vagabond for those out
there that are new to this or new
to this platform, whether it's myself and my
show, Derek's writings, Whitney's writings, Robert's writings, Matt
Aaron, and and, you know, which has obviously
been pulled back on a little bit lately
because we're dealing with other financial
burdens that are coming from, you know, censorship
and and suppression and lawsuits and whatever else,
all unjustified, in my opinion.
Nonetheless, the point is that's still coming and
will be growing back to where we were
no matter what. That's my that's I'm willing
that into reality.
But my point is that
all of our work, we've done a lot
of this where we have these, you know,
educated guesses. Here are the facts we've seen.
Here's what we've has been building. Here is
what has you know, what they've said before.
Here's what they've done in the last six
months. And here's why we think that lines
up to this being what comes next. Not
that we know for sure, not that we're
not considering other possibilities, but just an outline.
And then my point is for you, you
guys know this. That's why you're here. For
those that are new, take a second and
look back through our work. Take the last
American Bagathon website and go through and look
back to the last decade. And you tell
money how many times we've made statements like
this that don't turn out to be what
happens. And I'm not saying I've always right.
Hardly. I make mistakes. I think things might
happen that don't like anybody else.
But when we do things like this, it's
because I think the writing is on the
wall. Now I could still be wrong,
always. But what I'm saying is you look
what we go through today, and just a
focal point of artificial intelligence being used as
government,
which is really not even that contentious of
a topic. I mean, I'm gonna show you
things from the conversation, like, some pretty mainstreamy
type platforms out there that are talking about
a really obvious on the top of the
conversation concern.
Is that coming?
Right? Like, it it and discussing
whether it should be done this way or
that way, which is a point they'll make
today as opposed to whether it should happen
at all. I'm of the mind that it's
already happening. Now this, again, even that's not
that contentious. There's people who have made valid
arguments. And if you just look at what's
been going on and who's driving the bus
in, you know, the many buses,
it's obvious that that is a very plausible
and logical thing that might be happening. Happening,
and then we'll go through the actual evidence
that I think suggests that it is happening.
And other than their statements literally telling you
that AI is going to be used to
make our government more efficient.
But I really want you to think about
just outside of the conversation today and and
and take a look at how many times
that we put these things together for you
and how little that has effect on our
reach and growth in this field. Now not
because that's what we care about. Hardly. If
I cared about being popular and getting the
money and getting lots of shares, I'd be
screaming about q add on and left right
paradigm stuff, and we would be booming.
It's not what I care about. I'm in
this because of the truth, even to my
detriment, like and that's why I love supporting,
on that note that pops into my head,
groups like Odysee and Bitchute that absolutely
stand for your rights at to to their
detriment. Like, we bring up with BitChute every
time on the comment section. You guys, they
allow that section to be even what bots
will dump in there because it is what
free speech is, including people that manipulate that
free speech, and they do that because that's
how you on the side of your principles.
That's very important to think about. Anyway, the
point is go back and look at that
stuff. Many different times, we've called these things
out a lot during COVID nineteen. My point
of all that to say is today,
I think it's important. It behooves us all
to consider,
apolitically,
aside from left or right, which anybody
who really watches this show understands that's how
everything we're discussing comes from. And that's not
to say that I don't have different opinions.
I'll be like, just to pluck them out
of the ether. I think people like Maxine
Waters or Nancy Pelosi are the worst
thing I could I just or or, like,
even a Biden, for example. Just not only
just because they're senile and ridiculous and but
I don't think they're actually making the shots,
calling the shots, or making decisions.
The same thing. I feel the same way
right now about an Elon Musk. I feel
the same way about somebody like a a
McConnell.
It's my point is there's different,
levels of how much I dislike people depending
on but it's not unique to partisanship is
the point I'm making. And I wanna I
want people to really think about it in
a political sense whether that is what's going
on. And even if you think or even
let's just add to it that they may
think that's for your best interest.
I really don't think that. At best, I
argue they think it's for their best interest,
and that might align with your interests. I
know I'm a pessimist when it comes to
government, but we have every reason to be,
every reason to be.
But my point is that even considering that
with what we go through today, the different
foreign influence, and I'm not even talking about
the obvious, like,
shockingly large red flag of how many people
in this cabinet are completely tied and blindly
supportive of Israel no matter what they do
and are Zionist themselves. I'm talking about the
actual technical side, the technology,
whether China or Israel, who have invasive aspects
of what we're doing right now, rather what
they're doing and what that means for you.
And and let's just even say it all
goes the way we all want it to.
Like, James was just talking about, what does
that mean for the future?
What happens if we set up this dystopian
AI control structure and they run it the
right way and then the next person turns
it against you?
This is why we need to have these
conversations before they just rush into why we
needed to fight China, and we all yell
our partisan things, and then next thing we
wake up and somebody else is in control.
That on that I that's by design, guys.
That is how this is supposed to work.
That's why I love James' work so much
as he's been doing this for so very
long, making the same consistent points based on
his principles and nonpartisan perspectives and objectivity.
But, generally, the point is about AI governance
today. Some side points we'll make, in some
they they connect to this point. Things like
the interesting kind of
I am not gonna get into the what
you might think about the Ian Carroll thing,
specifically the point about the phone that they're
discussing, which I think ties back to important
writings that Whitney Whitney's done for TLAP
that are really important to the bigger conversation
of Israeli cybersecurity,
infiltration.
And now when you have a team screaming
about MAGA phones and Red Pill phones and
when you can literally prove that it's made
in Israel, that it's made by you and
an 8,200 people that are literally involved in
the process that have NSO group connections back
to the origin, who are the very people
who are being accused and now found guilty
of spying on Americans.
That sounds it it's insane how obvious that
is.
And my point is that we need to
see how that all comes together with what's
being rolled out, and the politics tends to
blind it all. But some of those different
points we're gonna get into as it relates,
as I just showed, to the larger conversation.
So we'll leave it there to start. Get
into a bunch of different things today. Shout
out to
well, Sense Receptor shared this, but in the
in the actual clip, this is what, what
what's the truth podcast
right here. I'll include the actual link. I'll
I'll add it for you. And we've been
on their show a couple times, I believe,
or once or twice.
Good conversation. But, you know, j just James
laying it down long term.
Now I wanted to include this to start
because this was just something that I wanted
to make sure you saw. I actually shared
this as well on oh, I think I've
got it right here. I shared this out
on actually, I should have grabbed,
Allison's version of it. I forgot to do
that. I shared this from Allison. Allison had
us on Allison Morrow.
Here we go.
To discuss RFK Jr.
I'll put this in. It'll be at the
bottom since I'm adding it late.
Add this to the bottom here so you
guys can it's important to share the original.
This is where we did this. I I
asked her if I could reshare it on
Substack because I thought it was an important
conversation. So Allison invited myself and Bernadette Pageron.
You might be familiar with her. She's associated
with Children's Health Defense, and now she's done
her own podcast. And I I have great
respect for her. I think she does great
work. Now we have a different opinion, a
difference of opinion about whether or not
RFK Jr is, I guess, I guess, the
crux of the point. And interestingly enough, it's
kinda similar to Derek and and,
Ian back and forth about this where the
basic point revolves around whether you
acknowledge what we see as a this
deviation from what was promised
and just say, I find that right now
dishonest
or that we believe that it's in this
in the pursuit of something larger,
which,
obviously, they could be right. That's old ultimately
argument. Her and I agree on most everything
in the conversation other than a few different
points around,
different nuance points you can check out for
yourself. But we both agree the risks of
the injections. We agree on the COVID nineteen
time frame. But what's interesting is that she's
of the mind that RFK Jr is kind
of playing the game to potentially change things
for the better in the long run, which,
my god, we should all actually want if
that's what's happening. I just don't think that's
what's happening. And I'd like to I I
pray every day that these people are right,
but I think the evidence clearly ends up
showing us that that's not what's happening, and
historically so as well. That's my opinion, though.
I recommend you watch this. It's called RFK
Junior hero or hypocrite.
Where, I mean, I lay out the evidence
of why I think and I make it
clear in the beginning whether or not that's
what he's doing, I still find a hypocrisy.
So it's more so of a conversation than
a debate because the the my starting point
is, basically, it's hypocrisy even if everything you're
saying is correct, which is that he's been
fighting the MMR shot his entire career or
rather, you know, vaxxed a little before forward
and has made it a principal point about
the dangers of autism, about the bad ingredients.
I mean, on and on. I mean, from
saying in front of congress that he would
give it to his kids and previously saying
that he wouldn't. You know, that kind of
a thing. There's a huge deviation here. My
mindset feel or my gut tells me he'd
if I had to pick, that it's more
so somehow manipulation,
which I that doesn't in my opinion, there's
no pass even if he's being threatened. It's
not we don't know that is the point.
You don't ever blindly assume into what just
makes it all make sense. You consider that.
My point is it's still hypocrisy for him
to even and we went through it all.
The the ridiculous nature of the whole the
way people are framing that article about how
we didn't read it, we went through it
line by line, guys. And it's very clear
that most of the people claiming that actually
probably didn't even read it. I'm not gonna
assume that. But if you read the actual
article, it's clear that he is leaning into
the MMR shot more than anything else. And
then we go over the vitamin a point,
which I even had a follow-up point on
and showed the the,
the actual way back machine, which just which
highlighted that the vitamin a point was there
well before they made this supposed shift. And
all that really shifted was that now you
require
doctor supervision.
Now I I maybe there's more to it,
but that to me sounds more restrictive. You
can go back to 2024 and before, and
they very clearly are saying vitamin a for
measles. Now did they push that? Did they
put it in Fox News articles? No. So
that's still a positive. And we go over
all that in the show. But I think
it's important to on the side of principles
and outcome.
But very important. Now on that note, on
top of that, I'm gonna go into something
in the next shows and and will be
going public or personally to one of these
upcoming protests joining Bernadette in regard to something
really crazy. I I was gonna go into
today, but I'm gonna put it off until
the next show.
It's very alarming, and it's in Tennessee. It
has to do with a bill
that is basically doing exactly what they did
they did in the act of 1986 in
Tennessee, which is essentially I shouldn't say exactly,
but very similar to basically making it that
if EPA
is okay or, you know, approves
a pesticide,
that therefore you can no longer hold those
pesticide companies liable in civil court
if that's somehow inaccurate.
And it's it's it's absolutely ridiculous. It's the
same thing they did before. Well, they won't
make them. If we don't do that, well,
good. We don't want any of it then.
Stop them. If they can't make something safe
and and effective, then stop letting them make
them. That sounds pretty simple to me. Oh
my god. We'll all die. No. Pretty sure
we'll be okay. My point though is that
that's an important conversation, and I'm gonna be
joining them in person to try to do
some on the ground work and maybe interview
them while they're doing that. And that's the
kind of important stuff they're working on. Just
wanna highlight that because that's crazy, and I
think that's gonna broaden out across this country,
especially with the kind of pro business, no
regulation mindset of the current administration under some
kind of flimsy guys of freedom, which if
you under you know, my mind is the
same as before is if you're gonna remove
regulations from powerful companies and not, like, remove
all of the government protection and everything, you're
basically just allowing them to do what they
want to us. And, you know, my point
is let's get rid of all government regulation,
not just those that apply to businesses that
make money. But and I mean, like, government,
if you really wanna understand my opinion about
that, but we'll get into other shows if
you don't know what I mean by that.
But the point here, guys, is it's a
great conversation. Thank you, Allison, for having us
on. And I think it's an important one
to have right now. We both agree with
that about the holding their feet to the
fire more than ever even if you believe
in these people.
I and let's also, I'll not forget, by
the way, he came out with another
attack on free speech, which is about fighting
antisemitism, which we'll go into more today, which
I'll I'll remember this when we go back
to it. Because he came out starting a
essentially, a a member rant, like, a four
I forget the term he used, but he
it wasn't just him saying this on Twitter.
He rolled out an an HHS joint task
force to ultimately fight antisemitism from the HHS.
It just doesn't make any sense other than
other than exactly what you know is happening
right now based on all the stuff we've
been showing you. That's what I believe is
very clear. I mean, you don't this is
that's I'll I'll get there in a minute.
It's unconstitutional, guys. The way they're when whatever
you think about this, even if it was
literal Hamas supporters marching to the street, these
are what they're doing is shockingly unconstitutional,
and anybody with integrity is calling this out
right now. But we'll come back to that.
Start people rattled off. Get all the angered
trolls in the track. Get all frustrated to
start. Now but here's something I wanted to
go to off the RFK point. Now this
is just a start. Again, that was starting
opening things I want you to see. To
start the show in earnest, like, I wanna
give you some opening points here that I
think demonstrate that it and and I could
go make a whole show like this, and
I kinda have already, of different points showing
you that we aren't going in the direction
that they promised. Do the same thing for
Biden or Trump before that or Obama or
any of the rest of them because they
all do the same thing. Promise, promise, promise,
but then excuse, excuse, and here's a couple
of breadcrumbs every time. And then as Corbett
points out, they build and they build and
they build, and everybody keeps cheering back in
the hamster wheel. My point is a lot
of the stuff that's happened isn't go promised
isn't happening.
Doctor Simon Godek says, still no COVID accountability.
I mean, we really think that's gonna happen.
I certainly hope so, but I find it
hard to believe why you've got people who
were chiefly involved with that same illusion packed
into the administration,
and Trump still tells you it's a good
thing, and he was responsible for Operation Warp
Speed, and and RFK just said the childhood
schedule and Warp Speed itself were good things
in front of Congress. Come on, guys. I
mean,
of course, all of that could be a
big smokescreen to roll out the big change.
If that happens, I will be right there
with you screaming how great it is until
we have any indication other than how hope
and, you know, whatever excuse makes it all
make sense, then I then that's ridiculous to
pretend is happening.
Other give me some evidence, and I'll talk
about it. But no equivalent accountability.
In fact, we're still using mRNA platforms. We're
still rolling forward an mRNA bird flu shot
through Moderna, which is being funded currently through
the Trump administration. No one in the MAGA
world wants to talk about that. Fauci, Wen,
and Bart Barracks still not arrested.
Yeah. What about that? What about,
Klaus Schwab? What about Bill Gates? What about
all the I'm not you know, whether you
think they should be or not, the point
is what was claimed and all the hype
about all the
military tribunals and everything that would change. Epstein
files still hidden. No surprise there.
Is this what it looks like winning or
to to win, he asks? And this is
what this person says. Did you really expect
that everything would magically change in less than
two months? This is how this is how
it kicks down the road. Right? Give them
some time. So, again, this is basically trust
the plan, man. They told you what would
happen. Just sit back and let it continue
to happen. Well, if it's not even beginning
to happen, then we can't say let it
continue.
So it's hope.
I've decided to believe that they said they
were gonna do something, and they will, even
though they've already walked back on, like, 16
things they said they would do. But, yeah,
well, well, just give it time.
I think that's just insane to me. And
it says I totally think that everything that
is happening is what winning looks like.
Right. So, you know, funding the MRA platform,
funding the Israeli war that was supposed to
be ended on day one, funding the Ukraine
war was supposed to be ended on day
one. Now, yes, everyone's debated despite Dallas Jones
said it was already over. Well, it's not,
and I don't believe it will be, but
we'll have to wait for that moment to
actually come.
I mean, guys, I who knows what's gonna
happen with Ukraine? We're not gonna get into
it today. There's there's reasons I could see
why it would make sense that they would
collectively want that to kind of go away
if Russia's on the same page. I can
also see a shocking amount of reasons why
Israel and The US would absolutely not want
that to go away. So it's up in
the air. Either way makes sense to me.
For them to claim they know this or
that, which they always tend to do in
the partisan mania when it rarely happens is
just embarrassing, and people keep following them for
some reason. My point is that I don't
believe it. If I had to call it,
I would argue that they're gonna find a
reason to make it continue
or shift the narrative and claim it's over
like Trump did in Syria even though we're
still there to this very day. Think about
how dumb that stuff is. Remember how they're
screaming last time that Trump ended the Syrian
war? He he defeated ISIS even though we're
still talking about ISIS and stare serious. I
mean, it's just ridiculous, guys. Narrative is all
they care about.
The point here is that that will continue
most likely because they have agreements about resource
men,
mining and all sorts of infrastructure rebuilding and
as well as Israel having designs on the
location just like they did with Syria. Look
at what they're doing there. It's not secret.
But as anybody honest would do, let's wait
and see what actually happens, not just narrative.
But damn, it's winning.
Right? It's winning to have meetings with Bill
Gates. It's winning to have a packed Palantir
administration,
all lobbyists and war hawks and everybody else.
But all that was what was promised. Right?
Winning. That's what he voted for, he says.
Now I bet you if you had him
write down what he voted for, it wouldn't
look like anything that's happening, but he'd go
wink, wink. That's what it really is behind
the scenes. But it says the deep state
wasn't built in a day.
It's not going I mean, again, what do
you mean by that? What is the deep
state? Is it building down the road? Are
we talking about an infrastructure here? Are we
talking about a ambiguous, unelected power structure that
is not one thing? I think these people
literally think they're fighting the Democrats as some
kind of DNC building.
I have faith and confidence there will be
an account, and there it is. That's the
only point that matter. I believe he told
me the right things. Whatever happens, I'm claiming
it's winning because they're keep telling me this
is what it looks like. That's my opinion,
obviously. Maybe I'm wrong. But here's what Simon
says. Winning requires constant pressure. So even if
you think they're actually doing what they said,
he's still right.
Feet to the fire, especially for those that
you believe in. The deep state won't disappear
on its own.
When what's concerning is that the entire administration
is APAC funded, which this guy likely won't
care about. I doubt anything will change on
that front at all, of course. Oh, he
does say down here, and he responded.
He says, I agree with you, but I
choose to stay optimistic, and I do whatever
I can to help the fight. Okay. Well,
I I agree with that.
Now to me, what that shows is somebody
who understands what he said is logical
and
is just gonna respond, well, I get it.
I'm gonna I'm gonna choose to believe.
Okay. Fine. Good. See, I can respect that.
If you wanna end it, well, I'm just
hoping for it. Okay. Great. I think that's
lofty and un un you know, not fact
based, but that's up for you to decide.
Michael Tracy points out that there's still censorship
on Twitter. Now this isn't even about censorship
on Twitter. The first point is obviously just
showing that there's no accountability for those things.
This point, this is not just censorship. This
is government compliance.
This is Twitter
continuing
to comply with government censorship demands all around
the world, multiple countries, and including The United
States because the GARM lawsuit made that clear.
Over about 90%, I think it was either
80 what's the exact give me the exact
number if you remember the top you had.
Was it 89 or was it 90 something?
Percent of the time,
they've complied with GARM requirements before that whole
thing pretended to go away and it really
actually didn't. Or the government
complaint command oh, no. That it was about
the government demands that was the 89 number,
and then it was GARM that largely complied
with their demands. Point either way is they've
complied with censorship demands in this country and
all around the world. Here, he's showing you
Sputnik
and RT. Why? Because Michael Tracy went to
Europe, tried to look at them on his
phone, and, Twitter said you can't. It says
account withheld.
See, you don't get to see this stuff
when you're in this country screaming about free
speech saviors when they're literally censoring, oh, but
those are bad propaganda platform.
Okay. Then you agree with censorship.
It's the same thing we're gonna get into
in a minute, talking about the protest. Well,
you're you're you're okay with violence? Well, no.
There are crimes against violence. The point is
about government suppression of speech. If there's a
violent crime, then arrest somebody. But the idea
is they're trying to create laws that stop
you from speaking about certain things and calling
that violence.
This is government suppression
through Twitter of their adversaries. The same thing
they scream about all around the world as
bad guys. But don't, you know, look the
other way, ladies and gentlemen, because we're not
supposed to care about this.
Sam Husseini, another point that hasn't changed. Here's
Sam Husseini in the new state department in
front of a new administration.
He says, so Trump admin state department had
their first briefing today. This was on the
third,
this was the third.
And he says, I was not called on
despite having my hand raised for virtually every
question. Now, you have to be calling everybody.
Right? Let's be clear. Sam Husseini is a
is a grizzled,
long term,
well respected person in this room, along with
Matt Lee and Saeed Erekat and people that
have been there for a very long time.
So the point is that if he's there
raising his hand the entire
time, well, maybe once, twice, you know, but
continuously like we saw with Matt Miller, which
I'm probably gonna tell you is gonna happen.
We'll have to wait and see. It shows
you that they're choosing not to call on
certain people.
Yeah. They get you in the room, but
then they just don't let you talk. And
so it's an it's an illusion. While they're
bringing in their funneling through their fake mainstream
alternative media special chair to the right to
make it seem like something's changing. But it
says they set up a series of structures
seemingly attempting to impose control. This included assigned
seats to people.
I'm Flashpoints.
So assigned seating where they kick them back
to the corner and don't call on them.
In other news, Thomas Massie
calls to end the Fed. Right? Isn't that
what MAGA's gonna do? Haven't we all been
told that Trump and Elon are gonna end
the Fed? No. No. No. You misunderstood. They're
going to audit the Fed. See, that's how
they play the game. Even though that's ridiculous
and never gonna amount to anything that's have
actual change, which Ron Paul would tell you,
which Edward Griffin down here will tell you.
And this is something decentered news has played.
Gee, Edward Griffin has talked about this, and
this is the creature from Jekyll Island. They
second look
at the Federal Reserve is the name of
the the book he wrote. He says, has
long argued that an audit is not necessary
and can even be counterproductive. The bottom line
is, guys, you're talking about a broken system.
People that are corrupt, who have created the
broken system, and you're you're asking them to
audit their fraud.
Now the game is, well, it's only the
one side. So we're the good guys auditing
the fraud. Well, the problem is it's not
going to change. It's going to be cemented
so they can use the problem like James
Corbett's talking about. Now, Mike, that's not an
opinion. That's what has continued to happen as
far back as you wanna look. Look. Now
I certainly hope it changes this time. There's
no indication that it will. They have no
incentive to change other than you believing that
they will without checking. To me, that's not
incentive. That's a freak that's a blank check
to do what they want and scream what
they want you to think is happening. My
point is that this is what real change
would look like. Now how much you wanna
bet this gets ignored if ever even voted
on? And if it does, it probably won't
pass. And they'll probably find a way to
blame on one side of the paradigm. Either
way, it's the same point. Your government will
not allow this to change.
I hope it changes, though. Maybe I'm wrong.
Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act, h r one
eight four six.
My point is the same as before with
Ron Paul where they tried to get him.
Like, Ron Paul is gonna help us do
it. And Ron Paul, hey. Let's send the
fed. And then, of course, you get the
dishonest people. I think it was the,
don't know, one of those Republican senators that
just always circle around Elon and Trump and
basically said, get Ron Paul to audit the
fed. Everyone's like, yeah. Audit the fed. Ron
Romano is like, you guys don't even understand
the audience that you're trying to court. It's
embarrassing.
The end of fed group is like, what
are you talking about, man? But they are
trying to manipulate the larger masses. Nope. My
point is illusion of change continues.
Here's another example. US halts aid to South
Africa immediately as Trump offers fast track citizenship.
Two obviously insulting points. So So we're gonna
keep funding an ongoing genocide with the most
documented amount of international war crimes that I
think anyone has ever seen
ever.
I mean, documented. Whether there's been some that
have been more in earnest, which I don't
even find it possible, but documented.
And yet you immediately pull funding from South
Africa, which there's plenty of things to criticize
going on there, but think about the inconsistency
of logic there. And then for a second
point of inconsistency,
offers these people to come settle in The
United States. Now, of course, where is the
question seeing as how
either they're gonna give them government land, which
would be essentially an American choice, but, you
know, or they're gonna find somebody else's land,
which would be pretty in on brand for
these current administrations
or Greenland or whatever else they do. But
the point is about inconsistency as always.
And, also, what's funny is this is being
reported now, like, it's breaking news. Here's Benny
Johnson breaking.
March 7, president Trump invites South African farmers
with families to United States with rapid pathways
to US citizenship.
Wow. That's some breaking news, Benny Johnson. Well,
here's, weirdly enough, the psychic report from the
last American Vagabond
from February 9.
Gee. This is a long time ago. And
I said, look at this. Trump to resettle
Africa Africaners and Afrikaners in US. I wasn't
guessing. It was a US government document, and
it's clearly real and it's clearly happening. So
ask yourself why it was only breaking news
when the MAGA people told you to start
talking about it. Because it was inconsistent. It
was embarrassing because they were too close to
the immigration conversation.
Think about how silly it is. Now I
said, are we as we reported on February
9, by the way, which, of course, gets
very little reach because that's how this platform
works, Even though we've got a lot of
following on here, it says, what was that
about stopping immigration again?
Yeah. Nothing.
Now what's funny about that is this person
made my point for me and says, white
immigrants have never been the issue.
Say the quiet part out loud, I see.
Stop being disingenuous. No. I'm not. You just
misunderstood what I was trying to get accomplished.
See, the the self serving assumption is like
this it's like branded in the brains of
partisanship at this point, and it says these
are our brothers and sisters, I guess, because
they're white?
You mean these these South Africans who came
from Denmark who have no like, literally nothing
in common with you? You're literal talk assembles
just because they're white does not mean it's
gonna be any more the assimilation is gonna
be any more difficult. There are people in
brown skin, black skin locations in the world
that are more close when it comes to
our ideology with our what they would assimilate
better. But you see, that's not what they
would think because it has nothing to do
with the assimilation.
It has nothing to do with anything other
than they're the same color as us for
some people. Now I can't speak for politicians
and everybody in the Trump administration,
but you begin to see that this is
where the point comes from Israel, especially as
the Ethiopian Jews are treated as second class
citizens.
Orthodox Jews who call out Zionism are treated
like terrorists. It's about Zionism. And there it's
a racist ideology. That is not even up
for debate.
I mean, we this is an important thing
to talk about in another conversation, but I'll
quickly play this.
Zionism
is racism.
Israel cannot be both. Israel is either
a racist Jewish state
or it's a democratic state for everybody, and
that's what Shlaim, he's a very prominent Israeli
historian.
And he goes he's sitting there with Human
Rights Watch, and he goes on to explain
why the
the nation state law that states very unequivocally
that it's a state for the Jews alone.
I know. Hard to wrap your mind around
why that's racist. Right? It's racist.
And that Zionism is the worst kind or
apartheid and Zionism as the worst kind of
racism there is.
So my point is this is what's bleeding
over into this country,
and he says white immigrants have never been
the issue.
Now the real point is not about whether
it's white or black or brown. It's about
immigration, and it's about the resources, if you're
gonna be accurate and logical about it, and
assimilation assimilation.
Those things clearly matter. Not racist points to
bring up. Right? But you can there's humanitarian
aspects to consider. There's you know? And that's
not for every American to have to shoulder.
The point is I said, thank you for
so perfectly making my point.
He says, I agree. We need to close
the border, which I didn't say I wanted
that. And, you know, the the amount of
blind assumption in the partisan field kills me.
And it says, but again, the third world
invasion wasn't white people, dude.
Well, dude, the third world invasion is being
driven by foreign governments, and Israel has been
screaming why that needs to happen. And I
can prove to you that they've been involved
in many different ways. Not that every aspect
of it is, but we've gone over this
in the shows. So if if we're gonna
call that out, let's recognize who's actually driving
that bus. But, secondarily,
it's not about
the only mindset that it's about a third
world invasion are the people that make this
about race. There are obvious other aspects to
this, foreign policy,
just the dam
decimation of other people's cultures and then criticizing
them when they flood away from your bombings.
The bottom line, though, is if we're gonna
make it consistent and say that it's not
it's about it's not about the color of
the person coming through. It's about what that
does to the system, which is what you're
gonna hear from people honestly having a conversation
about this, then this is the same thing.
And I don't think they care to even
understand.
And I'll I'll include the show. You can
watch that. I thought just by the way,
I think it's funny that we're gonna report
this a month ago, and it's breaking news
in the MAGA field right now. But how
about Black Rock or Panama Canal or the,
North American Union that Alex Jones is never
gonna call out because he's a part of
the deep state, it seems.
Kinda mean facetious, but how I mean, why
the hell are you not calling this stuff
out when you have to spend your entire
career
calling this stuff out and you stop when
it starts happening? I find that to be
pretty suspicious. As Israel's Globalist ambitions become clear,
TeamSport Republicans endorsed North American Union. Now Panama,
Greenland, net all this is part of that.
Just wanna show you, though, BlackRock apparently is
behind the play for Panama Canal, a direct
line to Donald Trump, which, by the way,
shouldn't be that surprising to you seeing as
how he also allowed the overtaking of the
finances of this country to BlackRock back during
the COVID nineteen dynamic.
The COVID coup, BlackRock take over American interest.
It's funny how many of the problems seem
to be aligned with what Trump is allowing,
and then you point the Democrats and Biden
with their part of it, but how often
the one side that you're pretending isn't doing
it rolls out the change that accomplishes what
we said wasn't supposed to happen
right in front of you. But BlackRock's only
a problem when it's Democrat connected. Right? Or,
I guess, not when they're funding Elon Musk
because that's that's against that's not something we're
supposed to care about. The point is all
of these things continue,
and the criticism's
barely existing in the conversation. Or how about
the war president? The peace president, I mean.
Excuse me.
Just in, president Trump. He says, we're at
final moments. Can't let them have nuclear weapons.
You know, the Iran government who the our
our our own state department back when Trump
was there and last Biden's I'm talking about
both, have stated publicly that they're not seeking
a nuclear weapon. So too have the International
Atomic Energy Agency who they use to investigate.
Now, gee, what do you think changed Trump's
mind and start screaming they have weapon nuclear
weapons again? I don't know. Maybe Netanyahu's
direct influence on what he says, seeing us
how that's the person who has been driving
this conversation for thirty years based on nothing,
who have been he's been roundly proven to
be wrong about everything he pushes.
Here's Trump again telling you that this has
to happen soon, and he says something's going
to happen very soon. You're gonna hear about
it. Oh, good. Is that what we all
wanted, that Trump's gonna
I mean, apparently knows they're gonna do something
to Iran? And his point in here is
if you don't make a deal,
we're coming after you militarily. That's what he
says.
So is that how you make deals with
people? You strong-arm them? Yes. That is exactly
how this government has always operated. Trump's just
more vocal in on the surface about it.
So now you're telling us do what we
want or we're gonna come after you. Now
here's what's stupid about this. They've already had
a deal that they complied with to a
tee until this last administration broke it. It
was called the JCPOA,
the joint comprehensive plan of action. Now, yes,
all the partisans have their talking point that
are already being dumped in the chat, I'm
sure. That's not oh, they're they gave the
money back. Biden hit the oh, they're all
BS.
The bottom line is very clear. They made
the agreement. Trump pulled out of it. Regardless
of whether you agree with his agree his
his reasonings,
that was unilateral.
And because he did that, which they signed
agreements on the deal, Iran was allowed to
increase their enrichment.
And they weren't allowed to continue until they
met the agreements, and they never did. So
Trump did that, and then they turned around
and pointed to what was legally allowed within
the deal and said they're violating
the deal or just making nuclear weapons even
though that's still not what was happening. Increased
enrichment is not the same thing.
This is used for nuclear civil programs. Not
oh, bottom line is, guys, of course, it
could be happening somewhere secretly.
The every piece of evidence other than them
screaming that shows you it's not.
And on and the bigger conversation is why
we would argue they wouldn't be allowed to
do what every other country in the world
is allowed to do, especially somebody maniacal like
Israel who has one of the largest stockpiles
in the world that, shh, we're not supposed
to talk about.
The point is right to Israel's long sought
US government war with Iran, still pushing flimsy
lies to get there, quite the peace president,
or bombing Somalia or any other number of
other examples. These are not consistent with anything
that was promised, and Biden is just the
same.
And on top of that,
responsible straight craft reports billionaire investor and prominent
private equity firm, Serbia's Capital Management, you know,
one of the good guys, ladies and gentlemen,
Steven Feinberg's possible ascension to the Pentagon number
two
is a textbook case of the military industrial
complex revolving door. But, you know,
what's I always forget how to say that
when it comes to my mind.
The new,
meet the new boss, same as the old
boss or whatever. I always forget that in
the moment. The point is that it's no
different, guys. It's a different flavor. And if
we can't see the same damn thing or
recognize this is not consistent with what the
flowery picture of the deep state fighting change
world was gonna be, now, yeah, it's only
been so many weeks. And, yeah, we can
see what happens in a month from now,
but if you can't see these choices already
going against that, then you're not paying attention.
But I hope you're right. As always, I
want it to be the positive things. But
as Jason pointed out back on the third,
which by the way, got a million views.
Good for him. That's just crazy because it's
I think this is what it looks like
for people just to be fed up.
No Epstein files. $16,000,000,000
in Israel in a month to Israel from
the United States government. Three US airstrikes in
Somalia in two weeks. I argue very clearly
in the interest of Israel in part.
New regime oh, RFK Jr pushing MMR vaccines
from measles or the fact that they're continuing
to make MMR shots for for bird flu
or they're they're con approving bird flu shots
for the chickens that we're going to eat,
all the things that we all said weren't
supposed to happen.
New regime, same playbook, different marketing, same grift.
Sadly, I agree.
Now I wanted to share this, but I
wanna make a point about it afterward.
For some reason, people thought I mean, if
you tell me if my wording was opaque,
that I was somehow calling out Sam Tripoli
even though we all you know, we connect
up we had connected many times over the
years.
He posted this because he has been calling
this out. And he says, listen to tinfoil
hat today and hear what will be news
six months to a year from now. And
it's Netanyahu's funding for Hamas.
This is Jerusalem Post,
March 4,
via
Cutter and also just directly, by the way,
enables October seventh invasion. Shin Bet reveals. Oh,
breaking news.
That's the joke he's making. I mean, really?
Like, I mean, it's actually, I thought I
had,
let me see if I can get it
to pop up.
Maybe this one. See if it pops up.
Oh, right. We got it.
Include this. The point is, clearly, as we've
been calling, like like like Sam has, like
a lot of us has,
This is the state department saying, Hamas is
pure evil. And I, like, always, like, oh,
you mean the is the Hamas that Israel
funds? Bad Hamas? You know, that nobody wants
to engage with if they're if they're dishonest.
And the point is, you can clearly prove
they've been funding, in this case, sending Mossad
to Qatar to continue the funding. That's through
it's Israel, but also direct funding in other
ways.
Or Netanyahu stating in his own meeting that
they need to continue funding Hamas to stop
them from seeking two state solution, to trick
them, to manipulate the outer world. That's what
this is really about.
So my point is that they're now just
saying that. Yeah. I found it. Now, yeah,
the question should be why. Why now? So
first, hatchet to Sam for being right about
this as well. And I simply said the
amount and this is this wasn't just about
this. This is one of the many things
I was seeing. The whole Ian thing was
in my mind when this was shared. The
amount of controlled releases, limited hangouts, talking taking
place right now.
Just head spinning.
Of course, it's positive new people see the
long known info. That's always good.
But, as always,
there's a point after which the powers that
shouldn't be are usually okay with you seeing
this kind of stuff to corral you somewhere
new.
Very important, never ending thing to think about.
Just because something's happening that's true, yes, that's
good. Period. They see it. New people recognize
it. But ask why they suddenly want that
to be called out. Now, yes, it could
just be that, you know, Elon Musk or
Trump or Biden or whoever else, Kamala Harris,
decided to show you it because they've just
wanted to know the truth.
What's funny when I say that, the people
that I hear that reflexively don't like when
I say the Biden part of it are
the ones that flexibly don't like the Trump
part of it. It shows you that divide.
The point is it's all your government. It
should matter the same way, both sides. But
the point is, usually, there's an agenda there.
Why would they suddenly want to? If your
response is because they're fighting for me, well,
that's a that's a personal belief.
You could be. Right? How about we stick
to the facts and what we can prove?
But I simply said on top of that,
just in case any of you out there
were in the impression I was calling out
Sam on this post, you're incorrect. I was
simply agreeing with his point and adding to
it. I just I just thought somebody else
was like, why are you calling out Sam?
Like, oh, Twitter.
Now on that note,
one of these things I thought was very
interesting. Now I'm actually not gonna get into
the larger point about all this. Now whatever
your thoughts on on Ian, I and there's
a lot of obvious reason to be suspicious
about all this. But I would want I
do wanna point out that I don't think
anybody's right now proving that we know this
person is deliberately deceiving people or deliberately part
of some gay. That's not to say that
he's unwittingly doing so.
But to be clear, I'm just suspicious about
a lot of this or pretty much all
of it. I mean, everything about this, but
but the weird way that it but him
and others have done the same when they
engage with Whitney's work, but then sort of,
like, like, gaslight and undermine what she's been
doing or or, like, call us out for
being blackpilled while they later cover the exact
same things in a different line. You know,
again, maybe that's just because it's working, because
they're getting algorithmically driven there. Maybe there's funding
that we don't know about that he's not
just hasn't looked through. It doesn't know it's
coming from somebody. I don't know. My point
is we don't know. That's not that doesn't
remove the obvious
red flags in all of this. I just
think it's always, even when it's it's important
to on the side of what we can
prove and be objective about it. So like
I said, this is not a wake up.
It's just as likely that he is sort
of, you know, choose
like, choosing my point is a lot of
people out there
kind of sense there might be a problem.
And if that starts to hit kind of
poke into something that undermines their larger like,
what they've built, their financial security, a lot
of people will just kinda go, I'm I'm
like, mentally block it out.
Not really know for sure if it's a
problem, but never look to find out. And
then that's, like, kind of plausible deniability. Now
to me, that's dishonesty
or either just kind of willful ignorance in
case it might be. I don't know if
that's happening or not. My point is there's
a big range of how this plays today.
And a lot of times, he points out
things that I do think are important and
not even in a way that's like a
bearing the truth or something else. So it's
up for you to decide.
Express
clear skepticism here because there's reason to. But
also consider the points of what anybody's saying.
Now what I thought was interesting in all
this is the timing, obviously. And I I
mean, I'll also weigh one more point down
on this. I tend to think see the
way that a lot of this goes is,
kind of a limited hangout in and of
itself, where
a lot of us and this is something
that I think, what Paulie was saying in
response to what he was doing is that,
you know, a lot of us have been
calling this out for a really long time.
That's not to say that they maybe just
didn't they maybe just discovered it. I don't
know.
My point, though, is to agree with the
general idea
that a lot of times what happens is
people like this, whether knowing or not,
get used to sort of cement a
truth light version of these things, even if
it's like, yes. Israel's behind it in a
way that doesn't give people source material, doesn't
allow them to understand it for themselves, and,
of course, couches it on a very partisan
Joe Rogan kind of thing. We've all we've
talked about how this works. Oh, it's on
Rogan, and it must be fake. And that's
their stupidity for assuming that. Just like it'd
be their stupidity for assuming it's true because
it's on Joe Rogan. It's the partisan game.
My point, though, is that we know that's
how this works. So I find it interesting
that after a lot of this is becoming
impossible to bury that you get something like
this where then he becomes the focal point
of attack from the Zionist mania,
which he seems to be defending himself against
and calling them out for it. Good. My
point is that they then point at him
and tear down his parts that his points
that don't go into the same depth that
we have to then people then say it's
been disproven,
and then they conflate that with our opinion,
Whitney's opinion, Derek's opinion. Even though our opinions
are
in some ways lined up, but we have
a breadth of source material and verification and
objectivity that's not included in that.
That's I think that's important to think about,
how they can create a limited hangout where
they undermine a point to make it seem
as if it's been debunked, but through a
partisan manipulation.
It's very important. Now all that being said,
the point I'm really gonna get into today
is one of the things he mentions on
here that really brings you back to the
larger point of today with through AI governance,
through Israeli infiltration,
and the idea that these things are, I
mean, undeniably
interconnected.
So the point is, as Adam Green points
out, the Infowars Rogan pipeline with Ian Carroll
promoting the made in Israel, Eric Prince, Blackwater
phone, which is just incredible to me that
we're still this is public information, guys. Someone
like Ian Carroll who is going through this
stuff and talking about Israel and the concerns
about infiltration
and our congress and then promotes a phone
that takes three seconds to look up is
made in Israel involving unit a through hundred
directly tied to the NSO group of all
things.
It's it that's that's I mean, I almost
find that impossible.
Or willful ignorance.
You can you tell me what you think.
But the the point out is that he
did he discussed that phone. Now here's what
Whitney said in response
to
basically, this is Ian Carroll saying, and we're
live,
and mentioning her, gives a shout out to
her book,
and then at the same time goes on
to call her kind of unhinged around the
Technocracy conversation. Now to be fair, I didn't
watch the whole thing. I'm going off what
but her and others have framed it as.
You should watch it for yourself. It's just
I didn't have the time to get into
the longer Joe Rogan podcast, which is the
same reason people are mad about my long
shows. I get it. The point, though, is
that it's it's
interesting to be referencing her work, and we
all know it's foundational in this larger conversation
of Israel, Epstein, and techno technocracy.
And then to sort of at the most
important point, in my opinion,
the the clear intersection of the technocratic drive
and
Zionism
or specifically
Silicon Valley and Zionism where you're talking about
Peter Thiel, for example. We're always a good
guy. We get we hear.
That's that's what he said. I don't understand
how you cannot see those as he's called
these out before Or when he gets asked
about this from Derrick Bros on an interview,
it becomes a sort of tap dance around
where we think I mean, it's maybe you
just miss it. Again, it's be objective. We
I don't wanna just start calling people controlled
opposition because that gets wildly overused. Consider that,
though.
But here's what he said in response.
Excuse
me. I really appreciate the shout outs as
Ian's kind words about my book and those,
but there are some things I don't think
were portrayed necessarily accurately about my work, both
regarding Epstein and otherwise. And I
and I think I should take the time
to clarify those things. I'm not looking to
cash shade on anyone with this clarification, just
that I think I'm the most qualified person
to represent my own work. And when other
people do it, not on my behalf, but
their own, I can some sometimes lead to
misconceptions.
My interest is ultimately in my work being
accurately conveyed, particularly to large audiences. Obviously,
the best way to understand my book is
to read it, but many who watch the
Rogan podcast, for example, won't. I would happily
make these clarifications on Rogan's platform or another
platform of similar size if I ever got
invited.
One thing I'd like to clarify is that
my books do not make the claim that
Epstein was Mossad. The book instead argues that
Epstein was an important part of a network,
though arguably middle management for a group composed
of transnational,
tran
I'm I don't know if that's is that
actually a is that how you say that?
I'm gonna look that up. Oh, no. I
misread it. I'm sorry. I thought it was
said transnational. Transgenerational
organized crime interest. That's interesting. That's actually more
important.
I was I was reading as transnational for
some reason. I thought it was a typo.
The point though, first,
is
she's also not saying there's not a connection
there. She's just trying to be very objective
and specific about what and what the work
shows.
We know that people like Acosta and others
and other work that's it's it's very clearly
shown in my opinion based on the different
examples of whether it's Acosta or or the
deeper,
evidentiary points coming back to their intelligence connections
of Epstein himself with the like, he would
rock, for example, and others. The point is
you can show lines directly to Mossad and
CIA, at the very least being used by
them. Whether as an agent or not, that's
a nuance point that can be discussed. I
think it's very clear.
So the point is that that gets represented
as basically she's saying it's Israel.
Right? And that's how this tends to go.
Even though that's not even inaccurate when you
look at the larger picture, I in my
opinion, I'll say speaking for myself, I think
it's important to not make it so blunt,
and that's how these Zionists make it about,
you hate Jewish people. And it's and it
it's it's a very clear cycle.
Whether he knows he's doing that or not
or whether he meant that or whether you
even think he did it, the point is
the same. Now it says most of whom
are the remnant of a Jewish mob component
of the National Crime Syndicate and who promote
ethno fascist policies, including via their ethnically focused
philanthropy among other activities. No. That is not
a racial point. That's a simple fact. The
Jewish mob was very prevalent in the in
the prohibition time and had a very outsized
role in this conversation. She cites it all
in her book, But that again is what
gets taken out of context. And this is
and other factions within both American Israeli intelligence.
They are not synonymous with either intelligence agency,
but arguably dominate the leadership
of those intelligence agencies. This is what she
talks about the, you know, by trinational intelligence
state where these things are kind of superseding
these governments.
Now that's what you call a deep state,
guys, or in one fashion. And so and
right now, I think we see that,
especially when you recognize this black male sexual
network was used by these people for what?
To gain information to control them and look
at what's happening with the current administration.
And it says evidence for Epstein's ties to
Israeli intelligence links him with Israeli military intelligence
as opposed to Mossad, which are different parts
of the Israeli intelligence apparatus. Very fair point.
So, you know, just instead of just saying,
you know it's like saying NSA instead of
CIA or FBI instead of it matters, doesn't
it? You or you just broadly can say
intelligence, but she's saying military intelligence.
Very important point.
For example, it would be like confusing the
DIA with the CIA.
However, as noted above, Epstein was ultimately working
for a network that greatly influences and exerts
significant control over both The US and Israel,
among other places. And that network is more
loyal to itself than any one nation and
also
involves multiple intelligence agencies. Now to me, I
think that represents the infiltration by this entity.
Now you can make it about Israel, which
is just the central point of where it
comes from. To me, it's about Zionism.
That is not about one it's about using
all of these locations. So that's the that
that's why you see Trudeau calling himself a
Zionist. You see Biden calling himself a Zionist.
You see most of his Trump's cabinet calling
himself Zionist. There's it's it's not hard to
see what you're looking at. So, yes, it
involves multiple agencies, but is that because it's
been a always been a national international dynamic,
or is it because that's what it's grown
to be? That's something for you to consider.
While many people do casually use Mossad as
a catchall term for Israeli intelligence,
I don't agree with that, and and not
making the accurate distinction creates an opening for
dishonest actors. That's exactly what I'm saying. To
discredit the work and I and others have
that I and others have done on the
topic when not framed properly, she says.
And it's important because that's what that's what
you're right now, you're gonna see this the
typical
characters
out there trying and specifically honing in on
Ian without ever talking about Whitney or even
tagging
because they don't want you to see the
work. They want you to undermine. They want
you to use him to dismiss the work.
That's how this works, whether he meant to
do that or not.
And it says other an another thing I'd
like to clarify is the implication that my
historical reporting on the Epstein case is commendable.
Is the implication that my historical reporting on
Epstein case is commendable, while my more current
reporting on Technocracy is significantly less so. Her
point being the the comment about how, basically,
this work is good, but she's kind of
unhinged around this technocracy topic. Because my book
on Epstein concludes with an entire chapter discussing
how Epstein became irrelevant
and thus expendable because the union of big
tech with the intelligence apparatus,
particularly those intelligence agencies most corrupted by the
Epstein network, where they may see, again, the
point is it's not we call it the
Epstein network because we know of Epstein.
She pointed out a second ago. The point
is this he's one entity. He's a cog
in the larger wheel of sexual blackmail and
and intelligence you manipulations.
To think he was somehow leading this isn't
is is, I mean, factually incorrect.
That's why it's important to get these listed.
I don't think they're ever really gonna show
you. But it says with a major focus
on national security contractor, Palantir, and its cofounder,
Peter Thiel.
That you you arguably could highlight the fact
that that essentially what this shifted into. Not
necessarily sexual blackmail, maybe, but you can see
clearly that the the the push has always
been in the same direction. And I think
all these all these entities are driving in
that same direction. Now that's
what I think the evidence shows,
but I think you need to consider all
the interconnected points as her books and her
amazing work around this has shown. And you
can see these people now built into the
power structure that is then, weirdly enough, rolling
out exactly what they all thought they would
roll out eventually.
Guess you could all I guess it's just
one big coincidence.
Well, Ian is an admitted fan of my
book. She says the reporting on technocracy that
he describes is more of a turn off
for most than my Epstein book is actually
in the book on Epstein itself and is
arguably the main conclusion
as it related to the present from the
book. So it's an interesting point.
Now is he you know, is it just
was it a misspeak
as if it's a separate book,
or does it mean he didn't even read
them?
That's certainly possible because it's not a separate
book. It's in the part part one and
two of the same book.
Right? That she doesn't have a specific technocracy
book. So interesting. Right? Start might
suggest that it was just a a point
about, you know, referencing that for a reason
to then go off and say, here's why
it's all so bad. It's like, to I
arguably to gaslight about what is most importantly
happening right now in my opinion. The technocratic
overtaking of this country.
Obviously, that's my opinion. You can decide on
what's more important or whether that's even happening.
But it's interesting timing, is it not, to
bury that right now using that it's just
fascinating.
But it says, there I note that Palantir
is the privatization
and recreation
of a nefarious neocon project developed by top
figures from the Iran Contra scandal and how
tools like it and its unit 8,200
developed equivalents
from Israel have amassed so much information on
us. A huge point of today, as which
which is what DOGE is doing, which I
think is a direct pipeline to Israeli intelligence,
and can also plant false and incriminating evidence
on one's devices without their knowledge,
have made the type of sex blackmail ops
once practiced by Epstein and other figures mentioned
in the book no longer needed or relevant.
See the point?
They've technologically progressed to the point to where
they don't need the physical videotapes anymore. How
long have we been saying that?
Now I funny enough, I knew I I'm
not gonna get into it because it's a
whole another topic, but soon, we're gonna talk
about the take it down act.
That's the point about Melania and Trump now
leaning into the idea that, okay, well, it's
deep fake revenge porn.
Sure. No one's gonna disagree with that. Take
it down. Right? Or it's like the online
safety bill. Children being bullied. Yeah. We all
support that. Except when they then use those
bills to then go after
anything else. Now I'll go through it. It
seems at the moment, the definitions are pretty
clear, but as always, these things can alter.
My point would be that this opens the
door
to claiming some things in AI deepfake when
it might not be and removing it, forcing
platforms to do so, which Twitter's already shown
a willingness to comply,
or another variation of that. But the interesting
point is that that's where this leads is
this kind of blackmail using things like that,
whether fake or gotten, you know, taken from
some kind of refrigerator camera or, you know,
whatever else is going on. Now it says,
I am she goes on to say, I
am not sure if Ian has discussed teal
or palantir very much. Really, not that much,
to be honest, I could say. I don't
believe he has, but my I may be
wrong on that. But a lot that's what
she says. But a lot of my concerns
about technocracy and the current administration are intimately
related to both, and those concerns are very
well documented in One Nation Under Blackmail, part
one and two. Remember, it's a two part
book, which was published even before the official
confirmation of the Thiel Epstein meetings.
It's amazing how many connections there are to
this administration. Our religion, our government is the
accurate way to frame that. It's not unique
to partisan.
And continuing, it says, of course, Peter Thiel's
errand boy now being vice president. That's Vance,
JD Vance, of The US and the many
teal or Palantir adjacent figures as as,
let me see if I got that one
to pop right up.
Yeah. Perfect. Here's one of them, and I
think the other one's connected in here. Derek
wrote this.
Meet the Peter Thiel acolytes in Donald Trump's
second administration. Oh, yeah. The link's right down
here to the other one. And he follows
up and specifically gets into Curtis Yarvin and
sort of the philosophy driving what they're doing.
Both are very important. I'll include those for
you. They'll be at the bottom again for
those looking for the show notes since I'm
adding them during show.
Mate, Peter Thiel's acolytes. I mean, it's everyone,
guys. It's it's crazy. I mean, it's they're
most of these people have a connection back
to that entity.
And knowing that that's basically total information awareness
from our government that's been privatized, knowing they're
literally working with Israel to commit genocide, knowing
that I mean, it's just it doesn't end.
It's it's
unreal to me how this is not the
most obvious thing in the world
to some people or that they ignore it.
And it says,
the adjacent figures, the administration,
made this not politically expedient to point out,
particularly if the view basically him not calling
it out for that reason and saying that
they the current administration is a major departure
from the Epstein network claiming that, which which,
she argues in her book as well as
today that it is not likely, likely not.
But it says, in that same vein, I
think it is some important to push back
as nicely as possible on Ian's suggestion that
Eric Prince unplugged phone, which we're gonna talk
about next, seems to be a good investment
for those concerned about illegal surveillance. Well, Ian
has since described that as an offhanded comment
and that he hasn't researched the phone. Insane.
I think both he and everyone should know
the following.
I mean, you gotta support a phone like
that. So that's my point, is that you
I don't find that's I just find that
to be a problem. Certainly could just be
irresponsibility.
But I think about it as something that
might you know, when you stand back and
look at the bigger picture, what's not being
discussed and what continues to happen.
But it says Prince has a close relationship
with the higher unit eight two hundred alumni,
alumnus, and cofounders of the Epstein and Teal
funded network, carbide nine one one, which we
talk about a lot, which seeks to harvest
as much data off your phone as possible
when you call 911 and feed the same
precrime paradigm
that the data with the data that Palantir
is also seeking. Now the point we're gonna
get into today more than anything is the
data that they're scooping from the systems they
have access to.
That's Doge and the same thing, which I
think is a pipeline to the Israeli government.
And I think what we're seeing right now
is a very clear siphoning off the information
for this AI structure that's being built,
not for your interest. Now these are all
my opinions, but I'm gonna lay out the
facts today for why I think this is
happening.
With this woman, her name is well, and,
you know, I think we'll just go over
the actual article,
which is these parts what we're gonna read
again.
But it says, to conclude, I am more
than happy to and very capable of representing
my own work to any audience. And when
other people try to present my work instead
of me, even well intentioned, it can lead
to misconceptions.
So let's go through this point about the
red pill phone, the MAGA phone, the Freedom
phone, all the names for the same thing
Eric Prince is putting forward that just so
happens to be built in Israel by intelligence
that is using a group that is proven
to have hacked and spied on Americans.
That's not a joke. It's one of the
easiest parts to prove in this conversation.
Here
is Casey Hoffinski.
Hoffinski, yeah, simply pointing out well, on on
the back of that point, what you're seeing
right now is this the Zionist effort to
scream about how he never calls out Cutter.
And the the the obvious point, anyone barely
paying attention is that as we already showed
you, Cutter is just basically a funnel for
Israel to manipulate these situations. So for them,
they're just trying to make it sound like
he's pull he's only blaming them, but look.
It's Cutter funding Hamas or whatever.
See, anybody know anyone has already primed with
the what we've been doing over the years
is, like, sees right through that. But a
lot of people don't have the tools because
they look at partisan media or mainstream alternative
media, which is kinda the same, which gives
you talking points and screenshots on a big
desk instead of actual source material for you
to learn and read and understand for yourself.
Most importantly, if you disagree with the way
I frame it. So that way you can
have an honest conversation about these things and
not be shocked and taken off guard by
these kind of conversations. But she says the
Qatar push is so obvious now. The technocrats
are setting themselves up as the heroes against
the evil Muslims. The Vance Teal, Musk, prince
regime isn't going to be fun, y'all.
So here, I I reposted her article today
on Substack just to get us more reach.
It's a good article. Here's the here it
is on TLab. Let's go through some points.
Now some of the ones I'm just the
main point I'm gonna make about the phone,
but I wanna reiterate some of these points
we've gone over in the past. Simply for
this example about Carbine nine one one, now
actually just Carbine.
I I mean, it's so funny. How long
have we been telling you that Israeli startup
intelligence companies
are overtaking 911 call centers?
And people look at you like you're crazy.
It's just because think about how wild that
is that we can prove these are things
that are happening in real time. And the
fact it's it's like saying
I mean, I can't even think of a
good example. Like, just something that's so normal.
And just because we're supposed to it it
the point is that it's easy to prove,
but because you're not supposed to believe that's
happening because there's some kind of weird mental
block about maybe being racist if you call
out Israel, that people just go, that can't
be true. And it's literally happening. And now
we're at a point where it's more not
just happening, it's long since been done.
And this is for instance, he writes, for
instance, Carbine's smartphone app.
So, again, Carbine nine one one, nine one
one call centers run by unit 8,200 Israeli
start up companies that are basically able to
and, actually, you know what? Let me grab
that clip that she said that's,
I think it was on I forgot the
show. Hold on. Let me grab this from
this clip that we recently played where she's
basically just talking about the
oh, come on. Tell me I can have
that in here.
Oh, that's frustrating. I guess I don't have
it. Well, basically, she's talking about the access
that Israel has to the,
nuclear facilities,
to water infrastructure.
It's it's a lot. And the problem
is that people act like it's it's it's
it's, you know, it's our the greatest ally.
Well, if you look at even briefly without
partisan lens about how many times Israel has
abused this relationship, or really if you just
don't ever have two brain cells to rub
together and look through when's the last time
Israel did anything that benefited this country?
The reality is it's been using this country,
and that's why our politicians are bought off,
controlled, blackmailed, and threatened to now be blind's
eye on the supporters screaming America First,
is that you can clearly see that these
things have gone with off without a hitch
and that they undermine American interest, and they
actually
are are put putting your life in danger
in some degree. Like, if they wanted to
pull this don't forget during October 7, post
that you had a lot of Israeli politicians
literally
basically throw veiled threats at Americans and say,
if you don't do this, then you're gonna
be next. And, of course, they wanted to
sound like, oh, what's Hamas coming to you?
Even though that's very unlikely and logical, doesn't
make sense. But, also, remember, Israel funds Hamas.
See how that comes around. But
for instance, Carbon smartphone
app, which was built after in conjunction with
these centers to where you can use the
app to call 911 and see the AI
technocracy direction, and it says, extracts the following
information from the phones in which it's installed.
Now the point in this is there are
there's phones coming out where it's already installed.
Now interestingly enough, I don't know whether it'd
be on the Maga phone. I bet you
that's probably exactly where it would be, but
it's coming out in certain devices without you
deciding that. And it says device location is
what's taken from the phone.
Video live stream from the phone.
Text messages, two way chats, data from user's
phone if they have the Carbine app.
Any information that comes over a data link,
which Carbine opens the case when the caller
link drops out. And it says Carbine stores
all the data it takes on past calls
and events.
You know, sort of like the Autentix point
where they take all your biometric data just
to gently and and totally benignly approve your
who you are for for Twitter even though
they don't need biometric to do so, and
that unit a 300 Israeli company keeps that
data.
That's all happening right now. Everywhere you look,
these things are happening.
I don't know why
honest conservatives
can't see it, which I think most of
them do. But
Twitter's still using Authentic to this very day.
This is an Israeli intelligence connected company that
is stealing your biometrics as we speak.
Here's Carbon nine one one, another one of
these companies started by Israeli intelligence populated all
over this country like chickenpox that are literally
storing everything you say if you use this
app. I'm arguing at this point is probably
beyond our control whether an app or not,
my opinion. But this says, going forward, in
regard to the point that I often make
about why these start up companies are a
problem.
They admit publicly they use these as extensions
of the Israeli government agenda. And it says
the same article also contains the stunning revelation.
The link to the article is right here.
So you can read it for yourself if
you wanna check it out directly from the
article where they're citing the intelligent entities that
are telling you this. And it says
the stunning revelation that many Israeli companies, including
Black Cube used by Weinstein, one of the
famous examples, have been and, by the way,
to harass, threaten
his victims.
These are Mossad agents working for this Israeli
startup company who were here threatening people connected
to the Weinstein, which by the way connects
back to the Epstein larger network. But it
says, have been founded as fronts for intelligence
operations
since 2012.
It states
or they're quote,
since 2012,
cyber related intelligence projects that were previously carried
out in house as in the government, in
the Israeli military,
and Israel's main intelligence arms are transferred
to court companies
that in some cases were built for this
exact purpose.
That's that's an intelligence front, guys. That's an
Israeli government, military,
creating
front companies that really have companies and products.
But through those companies, they are infiltrating
anywhere wherever they're happening.
It just couldn't be more clear,
as we've talked about many times, Israel's
global cybersecurity
infiltration.
Now the main point to this it well,
actually, one more thing I wanna read. It
says in addition, TRT World notes the company
Dark Matter, one of the examples of the
article that they're connected back to Israel, and
a UAE surveillance and intelligence group that employs
former US intelligence operatives,
attracted the attention of Chinese officials
as a as Smart Cities conference in 2015.
Dark Matter, which was launched to modernize Emirati
UAE intelligence and military operations,
signed a global strategic memorandum of understanding
with Huawei,
the Chinese tech giant. So you have Israeli
unit 8,200 start up connected companies making agreements
with Chinese Huawei companies.
See, and and then this is something that
our government's all concerned. I mean, it's the
same it's it's basically part of the same
interconnected spy network. And it says the middle
man in this sale was none other than
Erik Prince himself.
So he's connecting deals with these connected I
mean, it makes sense when you stand back
and look at everything he's connected to. He's
a central part in why this is all
happening in this article. Because the the point
is about, what's her name?
It's,
Leticia.
Yeah. I don't I can't remember. This woman
in the picture right here, it's probably stand
out to me.
Oh, I think I don't wanna I I
forget her name. It's in the article. She's
an Israeli spy. We I've mentioned her many
times. It's probably I can't oh, wait. Is
that it?
I give up on it. You guys can
look at it if you're look look at
it for yourselves. The point is that she
is an Israeli spy publicly
and connected with Prince through Compreim, Carbine. And
and the point being is they're openly
telling you that they basically
what's the word I'm looking for?
They they
they court is the word I'm looking for.
US companies
connected directly to US intelligence
so they I mean, arguably, the point is
can infiltrate those companies.
I mean and and and arguing that Eric
Prince is serving as sort of like a
token US entity so that they don't have
to sign other documents as being an outside
force doing so. This is what's happening in
the current government right now. Acting like there
is no issue. There's no conflicts of interest.
Yeah. We didn't even have to sign anything.
Right? Who who knows?
But it goes on to say,
oh, Leshem is her last name. Leshem and
other prince, Dorian bear
other associates, Dorian Barak,
also have business ties to UAE via their
prominent roles in the UAE Israel Business Council.
As TRT World concludes con con concluded, with
similar technology being used and the same mercenary
middleman,
Erik Prince, between Carbine and China, who brought
together UAE's dark matter surveillance technology with China
indicates
indications point to a likely transfer of surveillance
technology from Epstein's Israeli company
to China.
So you need to really start thinking about
how beyond the partisan
nonsensical points we get today.
It's I mean, no. I I honestly think
that nothing we get from the partisan conversation
is accurate.
It's all cartoonish bubbles of conversation. The reality
is and as James has talked about for
years, the back pipeline to it to China
from Israel to The United States. That there
I mean, just look at the the lockstep
during COVID nineteen and realize that there's something
beyond what we see that is really driving
a lot of this. And so here, at
the very least, you can see through Prince,
through Epstein's connection network. You see Israeli and
China ultimately sharing information. But, really, I think
what it's about is I mean, if you
wanna make it about specifically one problem, it's
Israel playing out all sides.
Or specifically to this
country, it's Israel having infiltration
into our tech that then has connections back
to arguable adversaries.
Historically, that should be a problem. Now here's
how it finishes.
Comframe is a very
suspect company.
It is highly, highly secretive,
targets sensitive American military agencies with foreign technology,
and its known employees are apparent spooks and
intelligence linked mercenaries.
Not only that, but the history of Israeli
espionage in The United States, which you need
to look into if you're not familiar with,
from Jonathan Pollard to Promise, which there's many
Promise software is another previous example. We'll get
into the NSO group and pair Pegasus.
How many times we need the Israeli government
to be caught spying on Americans or our
American government before we recognize that
they're not an ally? I don't know.
But from Jonathan Pollard to promise to comp
to to Converse and beyond shows a concerted
effort
to target the American military and secretary agenda
security agendas often with bugged or backdoor technology.
Now think about the megaphone again here. That's
where she's getting to. In addition to the
above,
Prince has also recently engaged in efforts to
market a very suspect smartphone to MAGA Republicans
as being unhackable,
unsurvailable.
Even the mainstream coverage of this was like,
that's completely inaccurate. But it says that phone
was designed in Israel. That's publicly cited by
Erik Prince, and the company that produces it
is called Unplugged. All the links are in
here too. It's just behind the the yellow.
According to reports, Unplugged's, quote, day to day
technology operations are run by air, Aaron Karpen,
a former employee of Communitech,
the Israeli startup that gave rise to the
new, now infamous hacker for hire firm,
NSO Group.
I mean, really take a second to digest
that. Carpent, like Leshem, is also a veteran
of unit a two hundred.
So we're talking about, like, the the notorious
NSO Group, which we're gonna show you again
in a second, has already been caught more
than once illegally
using this software,
or their software to spy on Americans, to
spy on American students.
And this phone
is is created
run by a former employee of that start
up.
I just find that to be insane. And
these are it's just it's just jumping around
at these different people.
Notably, Dark Matter, the UAE private intelligence company
that was mentioned earlier due to its association
with Prince, once marketed an ultra secure phone
called Khatim,
only to be later outed for hacking dissidents
and journalists.
Surprise, surprise.
No connection there. Right? In addition, Prince debuted
Unplugged's phone on Steve Bannon's War Room program.
Both Prince and Bannon have controversial relationships with
exiled Chinese billionaire,
I think it's Gao Wenju,
also known as Miles Gao. We've talked about
this more than once, I believe. Let me
see if this pops up.
Yep. There you go. I'll include this one.
This Matt Ehret wrote this article.
It's an important one.
It's called
Steve Bannon and China's deep state.
Now going forward, that prince would help market
this phone specifically to MAGA Republicans
is disturbing
given that his associate, Leshem,
another known and publicly acknowledged Israeli intelligence veteran,
and operatives have played a major role in
developing the infrastructure for the US war on
domestic terror, which is mainly targeted at the
political right and has already utilized
mass surveillance through smartphones and other technologies to
justify arrests, including precrime arrests against Republicans.
The same point I make about quickly when
I say they called you antisemites for your
red hats and the trucker convoy. Guys, you
forget that time frame? It's amazing the people
that have been turned around to start screaming
you're an antisemite to people that are
calling for an end of genocide. Either whatever
you think about them, it's the same thing
that was used against you. And these same
people who you're now fighting for were the
ones that did it to you.
It says, given the consent of the con
the content of this investigation,
Prince's ties to foreign governments and intelligence agencies
should be heavily scrutinized,
especially Conframe, whose sec secretive
activities may be drastically undermining American national security.
Now the point is about the phone and
the overlap today, but Conframe is the direct
infiltration into national security intelligence in this country.
That because of Prince and the overlap, they
act like it's just an American company. We're
being played, guys. I mean, in everywhere you
look.
You know how often I hope that I'm
wrong about this, guys? It's it's unnerving to
see how much this continues even though it's
obvious.
This is an infiltration. Maybe it's always maybe
they're just showing you what it's always been.
Who knows? All I hope is that you
can consider this.
Now this oh, that's the article we already
referenced.
Now here's just a core mainstream article, 2022.
Eric Prince wants to sell you a secure
smartphone that's too good to be true. Just
show you two points I wanna make in
this. Read for yourself. It's mainstream, but they're
just basically saying these claims don't appear to
be accurate. And it's not even getting into
what we were talking about. It's just, like,
whether it is actually what they claim it
is. But it says, boasting falsely that Unplugged
has built the first operating system free of
big tech monetization
and analytics,
which, by the way, is patently false. Right
down in our show notes, by the way,
you can get an above phone if you
would like to get one that is literally
using what they actually reference in this. Oh,
they I think it's GrapheneOS. It's a it's
a system that is actually de Googled and
is not tied to Israeli governments.
The point
is
boasting falsely that Unplugged has done that. Prince
bragged that the device is protected by government
grade encryption. Yeah. Which government? Better yet, the
pitch added,
Unplugged is to be hosted
on a global array of server farms
so that it, guess what, can never be
taken offline.
One option
is said to be a server farm on
a vessel located in undisclosed location on international
waters
connected to satellite via Elon Musk's Starlink.
An unplugged spokesperson explained that guess what, guys?
They benefit in having servers that are not
subject to any government law.
Ah, and the point becomes clear.
So what happens when they find out that
they've been spying and collecting all this data
from you? Well, too bad. We're in the
middle. We're maritime law. We're in the middle
of the ocean. Or whatever you wanna consider.
The point is to boast that you're not
bound by law while you're literally hosting people's
I mean, that seems that seems like you
almost deserve to be played. It seems crazy
to me. And then considering the Israeli infiltration,
you can clearly and this isn't even about
infiltration. This is public stated
Israeli intelligence
connected
companies
and and then even more so employee directly
tied back to the NSO group, which is
nefarious,
notorious,
not subject to governmental law, sure sounds like
what Israel tends to do.
And you can just see there, you know,
these are the same screenshots you're gonna see
floating around the show made in Israel. And
it says in this it says in the
article now it says unplugged day to day
technology. Even in this article, it says, are
run by, the,
Karpen,
the Israeli start up company, CommunityTake,com
Community Take
that gave rise to the now infamous hacker
for hire NSO Group.
Right. So he this is important.
Carpent built the Intacct phone, which the company
called a military grade mobile device. He also
is a veteran of unit eighty two hundred,
the agency that conducts cyber espionage and is
the country's equivalent of NSA.
So it wasn't just some phone he's involved.
He built a government
a a Israeli intelligence phone
and then market it through these different groups.
Now here, just as also Eric Prince, making
sure you know that he provided the deal
the information to Israel that allowed them to
flood Gaza, which has caused untold amounts of
disease, killed death.
I mean, in a number of things. This
was a crime. Unequivocally
a crime, but here he is boasting about
it.
Don't forget the infiltration is important, guys, all
across the world. Israeli government infiltration. And really
just my larger opinion, I've included these shows
for the podcast. You can watch them. The
new Trump administration and the technocratic Zionist coup
of the United States. Now this brings us
to the point of these groups
and the conversation of the the college shutdown.
This is something from Derek on November 30.
Meet the spyware companies preparing to unleash their
new tech, their tech during Trump's second term.
Referencing the NSO group, Pegasus is the point,
and these are all it's just fun. They're
allowing this to happen even though it's directly
tied back to the same groups that have
already been caught literally breaking the law. That's
that's that's the blind support for Israel coming
from the Trump administration or the Biden administration,
but we're currently in the Trump administration.
He also
covered this, following up January 7, couple months
ago.
Israeli spyware firm NSO Group found liable for
hacks of WhatsApp users.
So they're in many ways, this is not
the first time. They're being caught. That's that
is literally the per the peep the person
involved with making the phone for the and
the group that the Aneso group, the Pegasus
software, is tied to Erik Prince, is making
the phone for you that is also still
through that group tied back to Israeli intelligence.
It just seems like a no brainer to
me.
Like, if this was Chinese intelligence, would you
be okay with that? It shouldn't be if
it was the CIA. If, literally, if you
told Americans they had a phone built by
the CIA, would you buy it? Why would
you buy one connected to the Israeli intelligence?
Why is that different or better? It's it's
just it's willful ignorance.
So my point in this is to connect
this with what's currently happening. So not only
are you being played into supporting this infiltration,
these with these very groups overlapped,
they're using these same groups, the NSO groups,
to spy on American activists.
So think about the overlap there. As you're
being played as put the phone in your
pocket, they're also using this to spy on
the activists that are calling them out. And
then you're turning around and calling them racist
and trying to shut that down from happening.
You're being used.
Here, this goes back to 2022.
So it's not just Americans, by the way.
The Israeli government is using it to spy
on their own people who don't like what
they're doing. Same old government stuff, guys. It's
not like they're all in unison fighting for
the Jewish people. It's it's a it's a
lie, guys. It's a false construct.
I argue most Jewish people right now are
very uncomfortable with the reality of what they're
learning about what Zionist is. At the very
least, there's a massive growing movement of people
in the world, Jewish orthodox groups that are
calling this out and have been for a
very long time. We'll get to one example
in a minute.
My point, though,
police used invasive tech by second Israeli company
to target activists.
Guess which one?
The NSO group.
Shocking.
So they're even spying on their own people,
Jewish or otherwise, because it doesn't matter, guys.
It's about Zionism.
But as the nation covered, they're using the
same thing against you today. Israel's war on
American student activists using the same kind of
technology, 2023.
Also, what we also we just recently covered,
2025.
This Qatar US group, the far right group
building a list of pro Palestinian activists to
deport. And they're literally using Americans.
They're they're using the people they're highlighting as,
like, wearing a Palestinian flag and then reporting
them to ICE to get them deported, many
of which are just Americans.
And just it's they're this is being abused
publicly
by Zionism, by Israel, and they're proudly displaying
this. And your government doesn't care.
Now here is Greenblatt.
May I've just elite the elite audio telling
you the problem is not about left and
right.
It's about the generational gap, and that's why
they're so aggressively targeting
our generate our our our, you know, people
in colleges and below that, your children in
the schools. That's what all this comes down
to. And when we get to the AI
influence on the schooling and, I mean, everything,
it's it's gets alarming to see how much
they can influence
if not already
using this AI
rollout
if Israel's driving the bus. Or even the
people we're looking at, if it's not I
mean, I think it's obvious the rains that
have been placed on this administration.
But either way,
the rollout is concerning for a lot of
reasons. But here's what Greenblatt wanted you to
know, or rather didn't want you to know,
but but we found out. I also
wanna point out that we have a major,
major,
major
generational problem. All the polling I've seen, ADL's
polling,
ICC's
polling,
independent
polling suggests
this is not a left right gap, folks.
The issue in United States support for Israel
is not left and right.
It is young and old.
And so we really have a TikTok problem,
a Gen Z problem that our community needs
to put. The same brains that gave us
Tagli,
the same brains that gave us all these
other amazing innovations
need to put our energy toward this, like,
fast.
And, again, like we've been chasing this left
right divide.
It's the wrong
game.
The real
game of the next generation.
We saw a dramatic change
in the language of the activists here in
America on October.
The language of groups that we belong tracked
have long been problematic,
like Students for Justice Palestine and Jewish Voice
for Peace.
The language I could show you from their
toolkits
because our analysts are in their groups.
We saw this again on October.
It was that fast.
Right. So as always, don't miss the fact
that you have this Israeli
company.
It's what they are.
Openly oh, I guess. No. Yeah. I always
do that. This I gotta forget I always
forget it's leaked.
Now known that they have spies,
literal spies in Jewish organizations in America.
I remember those it's the one I always
forget, Jewish Voice for Peace and Jewish Voice
of America. They're they're the largest group. They
were putting on most of the protests that
we're calling they were called antisemitic,
Columbia and elsewhere, and they're using that to
then go after the protest today. It's it's
insane. It's obvious.
I'd say to call them racist, it is
it it it is insulting to your intelligence
or rather antisemitic.
That's not to say it's not possible. The
point is you can listen to them, and
we'll go we'll get there in a second.
But what he wants you to know is
that we can't allow that.
We need to set we we've inspired we've
been watching them. I mean, even just the
idea that this company is watching American students
and tracking what they say, why is that
allowed in any context?
Because we're not supposed to criticize Israel is
the point, and you damn well know that,
guys. It's not okay, and it's time to
start calling it out. It has nothing to
do
it has nothing to do with racism.
That's not to say there's no that there's
never an intersection.
In fact, the largest intersection comes from those
trying to make it about racism to make
it seem like what we do is racist,
when in fact, it's not. That is the
game. And many Zionists are calling it out
or many Israelis or Jews are calling it
out today and highlighting that Zionism is a
problem.
So in general, though, this is always ongoing.
Whether it's the state spy devices they found
in the last Trump administration at the White
House that nobody cared about that were literally
proven to be from Israel or the different
times they've attacked US military installations or ships
or, you know, whatever else. All the amazing
things they've done for the point is that
they're constantly, constantly, constantly being caught spying on
this country.
Now Max Blumenthal just makes an excellent point
that it's like they're not even trying to
hide this stuff anymore.
Axios reported,
Israel learned it was just while Trump administration
consulted with Israel about the possibility of engaging
with Hamas, Israel learned about aspects of the
talks through other channels. As Max Shibley points
out, so Israel's spying on the Trump miss
administration and leaking its sensitive diplomatic move to
the press, which is not even remotely new.
They do that constantly to drive the conversation
in a way that makes them look like
they have influence and control over this country,
which they very clearly do in my opinion.
But here is where we get to the
part about the protest.
And I think, again, the premise on this
needs to be very simple.
There it does the the the suppression
of speech around
anything,
racism, antisemitism,
anti Muslim, anti Christian, it is censorship, guys.
Rather specifically, it is a violation of your
first amendment. It's only censorship when it comes
to the government doing it against individuals. I'll
make that point in a second.
Or rather specifically a violation of free speech
from your government,
not a school.
Now there's a conversation to be had there,
of course, on why they are allowed to
suppress them. But the point is about censorship
and free speech.
And the reality being that the government pulling
funding, that's completely within their purview. The argument
that they're doing so because of speech is
a violation of your rights.
That it's so simple as that. And on
top of that, the bigger picture is that
they are then through that driving that action.
Now what kills me is that there are,
as always,
the typical sycophants out there that will ignore
the obvious because they like what's happening.
And what's even more insulting are the people
that were the most vocal about the big
bad Democrats, who I agree at the time
were ridiculous in the point they were making.
And I'm, like, not different to now. I
see them as all ridiculous.
My point is that at the time, the
point they were making, they're fair. Right? They
are ridiculous. Well, look at what they're doing.
That's crazy. But the most vocal ones, the
ones that turn right around and do the
same and act like it's not happening or
ignore it because it doesn't it's not what
they wanna call out. Like, the, you know,
the woke right and the woke left, guys,
is what it really is. And the re
them getting people fired for making bad jokes
online about Trump's being assassination
attempt.
Clearly, these people are the same thing, and
they I think they even somewhere internally know
it, if not, don't care. So Libs of
TikTok
highlights this. And and and to be clear,
just quotes what she says, but this is
the kind of Elon Musk endorsement today where
you just go, you know, interesting, and then
get it a thousand. I mean, that's the
point. This account now has 4,000,000 views. So
when they just point to something, it gets
an x exponential amount of views. That's the
point. So this is support.
Especially since you can go on to prove
that they very clearly have consistently supported this
exact kind of action against people that are
calling out Israel.
I simply tagged it. Well, let's let's let's
do it first. Here is secretary Linda McMahon.
Tell you, the president has said he's absolutely
not going to allow federal funds to be
going to these universities
that continue,
to allow antisemitism
on its campus. And Okay. Right there.
That alone is clear.
You're not going to allow and then he
has said that. He's not trying to hide
it. Not gonna allow funding to go to
schools that allow
what?
Anti Semitism. She didn't say violence. Now that's
the way they're trying to play this. If
violence is committed, it's a crime. You already
have the tools to stop that. You don't
need you can expel somebody. If you choose,
you can pull their funding. That's all there.
Whether or not, it's because of a racist
act. Violence is violence. That's see, they're playing
they're conflating these things, and that's exactly what
they said the left was doing before because
they were. So you're the same thing. You're
becoming exactly what you thought you were fighting.
If you're honest enough to see that, start
calling it out.
The point is you're gonna stop funding to
the school if they allow speech.
That's what antisemitism is. Make it anti Christian.
Make it anti Muslim. It's all speech. Right?
You're allowed to say and feel what you
want. I can say you're a disgusting person
if you feel a certain way that I
think is disgusting. That's all free speech.
These people are literally rolling out that you're
not allowed to say certain things if it's
against Israel,
and everybody who is, like, wearing badges that
they're fighting for free speech are the ones
cheering this on.
It it's a great inversion, I guess. I
mean, I I would begin to wonder if
there is some larger psychological operation happening with
how people can't see how obvious this is.
Or, again, maybe it's that they really do
and it's because of how controlled the media
sphere is and we just don't see all
of their comments. I mean, realize, guys, the
world does not only exist on Twitter. There's
a large world of people out there that
are just fed up with how dumb all
this is. They just check out.
That's part of it too.
I mean, trust me, I feel like you're
in that half the time anyway because I'm
so fed up with how the fever pitch
is just such nonsense all the time. And
I'm not saying my opinion. I'm talking about
people that are screening subjective, unproven, unverified things,
and and the the argument becomes back and
forth between two things that no one can
prove.
It's exhausting.
Some days, I'm just like, I I just
the the the pitch is too high. I'm
gonna let it drown out.
So this
is
unconstitutional.
Anyone,
anywhere saying that's not the case, you should
call out.
This is there's no error in this conversation.
You either can agree that this should be
the way it should be and say that,
well, limited speech is what I believe in
because we're not allowed to call we're not
your antisemitism just should not be allowed. It's
so vile. Okay. I disagree
with the part that it shouldn't be allowed.
I agree. Antisemitism or any kind of racism
is vile.
But if we can have a conversation,
and we can debate whether limited speech versus
free speech absolute is what it should be.
That I'm all okay with. I'm I'm not
gonna be angry or mad that you have
a difference of opinion. That's what partisanship wants
from you. We can have an amicable conversation
about things that we disagree on. Even if
it gets serious and heated, we can have
an amicable conversation. These people
want you to call what they're doing free
speech so you either start believing that if,
you know, free speech except for Israel
or so they cement in your mind that
whatever they tell you is what it is.
Everything means nothing. Nothing means everything.
I hope you can see through it.
It's something we're not going to do, and
I think there are a lot of different
ways to look at that. The that funding
supports research.
It it supports,
other many other programs that the universities offer.
So if,
universities like Columbia and the Department of Education
has launched five investigations now into different universities
to make sure that they are not allowing
antisemitism,
Kids ought to be able to go to
college, and parents ought to feel good about
their kids going to college knowing they're in
a safe environment.
Okay. Well, by the way, there's a I
mean, I won't go into that. I mean,
this is funny. And now we're talking about
safe
areas?
Really?
Are we are you just the Democrats now?
I mean, that's kinda funny. But so the
the point, obviously, guys, is
if we're talking about what again, violence
is already dealt. There's already crimes. You can
be expelled.
Okay. Which we'll get to more about some
example, but what about the other side of
this conversation? Are we are you actually of
the mind that only Jewish people are should
be protected in this conversation or of the
mind that only whatever you wanna claim semites
are should be protected? What about people who
were attacked by people claiming to be their
Israeli really, again, I'm making it more convoluted
because I'm trying to be accurate about it.
Zionists that are out there, whether Jewish or
otherwise, who are making it about themselves,
attacking somebody
who has a Palestinian flag.
Endless amounts of videos of those, just like
there's videos of everything we can talk about.
What about them? Are they not people at
the school? Do they not deserve to have
safety? Why is it and and quite frankly,
I think we can prove at this point,
as we've done many times, that there was
an outsized role played by the Zionist creating
that conflict as even the police were calling
out.
Well, but either way, let's just say it
was both happening. Why is only one being
condemned? Why is only one being dealt with?
Why is only one one obviously, you already
know the answer to this because there's one
entity controlling and dictating and threatening blackmailing and
whatever else driving this administration to achieve what
it is.
That's why they're funding the genocide. That's why
they've given them 16,000,000,000
plus dollars. That's an all against what they
said they would do. That's why they're allowing
me I mean, I could go on forever.
The genocide should be enough, quite frankly. And
to allow this this kind of unrest, it
this is not about freedom of speech. We're
talking about violence on campus. I know. And
there you go. And there and the and
the shoe drops. Right? Well, no. You weren't
talking about violence. You were talking about speech.
Now you're talking about violence. Well, guess what?
You have a you have a hey. There's
a law for that. There's already something in
place. If they're violent, arrest them. So what's
the point here? Them
clumsily, if not in you know, I don't
know whether it's delivered or not.
Either so to play you or because they're
that stupid, conflating violence with antisemitism
in order to make this make sense. And
now the entire talking point partisan argument is
that, are you okay with violence on campus?
Well, who's talking about violence? I thought we
were talking about speech.
If there's violence, you don't need some new
law. It's already there. It's very logically simple,
isn't it? The problem is that people are
dishonest in this conversation.
And and college presidents,
need to call in the police right away.
They have to quell these uprisings and not
allow
faculty to be attacked or other students to
be attacked. So we're Okay. Yeah. I well,
I agree. How about the faculty that was
attacked repeatedly by the Zionist? Oh, but we
don't care about that one. I care about
all of them, whether it's a Palestinian flag
waiver or somebody screaming Zionist chance. Both of
them, if they commit a crime against somebody
else, should be held accountable. Oh my god.
It's crazy. Right? Crazy how objectivity seems like
it's
I mean, it is weird today. It feels
like that is the the minority in the
conversation, but that's not real, I think. I
think that's just in the controlled fear. That's
my opinion.
But here
oh, man. StreamYard's acting pretty funny today, guys.
That is strange. Okay. Sorry. Continuing.
So here at first was just this post.
Yeah. It's this one here. I simply showed
this.
Oh, actually, first, what I said was,
so you don't support the First Amendment?
I mean, you know, just putting a fine
point on it, guys.
Apparently not, because there's no error in that
conversation. You're talking about antisemitism, not violence, and
if it's not violence, then there's a law.
But I also pointed out a response to
her post that's worth noting, and this response
is actually to her post right here. And
it says from toward Jews.
Compromising free speech under the banner of fighting
antisemitism
is only helping Israel while exploiting American Jews,
says the Orthodox Jewish Organization.
Silencing protest does not make Jews safer. It
fuels resentment and division. In my opinion, which
I think is pretty well documented, that's what
Zionism does. It manufactures
that sentiment.
And and even in the minds of Jews,
they make them feel unsafe when in cases
when they're not actually unsafe. It's very clear.
I mean, there's plenty of Jewish people and
Jewish organizations who have been screaming about this.
Jewish students that goes on, and here's one
of them. Jewish students go are are held
accountable for Israel's actions as they are wrongly
perceived as extensions of Israel. See? And many
of those Jewish students are the ones calling
out Israel. It's a it's a very clear
Zionist play. And it's this time to call
out Israel's ceaseless conflation of Zionism
Judaism with Zionism.
Absolutely.
Of course, they'll never respond to that because
their game is to make it seem like
there's only one conversation.
But here's somebody responding.
And this is just my point about it.
So
clearly, we're talking speech. Right? But because she
pulled at the last second and made it
about violence, this guy thinks, oh, here's a
here's a clip of this guy who knows
if he's actually somebody supporting Palestine or a
Zionist who's out there making it look like
he you you never know. May maybe he's
a Palestinian pretending to be a Zionist and
carrying out violence. All of that's certainly possible.
The point is it's a contextless video of
a guy running up and hitting the guy
in the head. Okay. I'm I'm assuming oh,
there you go. He's got this guy's picture
there.
My point is, regardless of who and why
and how,
it's a crime.
The guy hit the guy with the board.
Arrest him. End of point.
Right? See, he thinks he's a mic drop
showing, well, there's the violence
as if I'm suggesting that that's not the
the so you I said when I say,
so you don't support the first amendment, if
you're responding with what about the violence, I
think you're brain dead. Did I say violence?
Are we talking about anything other than speech?
You're the one pulling it into violence to
make it about to make it okay to
censor certain kinds of speech. You're either that
easy to play or you're a very dishonest
person. But they're going, what about violence? You're
okay with violence? I didn't even mention it.
There's many of them. This person says, first
amendment doesn't protect violence.
Yeah. We agree. And had the and had
and I think they mistyped and said, had
you listened carefully, assuming that I didn't as
always, because self serving assumption is partisan number
one, you would have noticed that's what she
said.
See how stupid this is? Well, I already
went through it all. I'm gonna repeat it
again. Violence is a crime. She's talking about
antisemitism. Are you now if you wanna say
an antisemitic violent act, yeah, we talk about
the same thing. I would just go, well,
it would be irrelevant. What caused it? Violence
is a crime. See how simple it is?
The logic is there. These people either aren't
very smart
or very dishonest or are bots. That's also
a very large con part of the conversation.
And I'm being very specific and and and
certain about this because there's no air in
this conversation, guys. There really isn't. This is
a very specific fundamental point. And what I
think is hilarious and alarming is the people
that are screaming the most about fighting for
the constitution seem to be at least the
the the core part of that circle, not
all the conservatives. I think they are uncomfortable
with this. They seem to be the ones
that are going after it the most. Or
rather, let's just put it make it clear
just as much as the Democrats were going
after it because the point is your government
is always doing this.
This person says, good. Real education isn't government
funded anyway. Propaganda is.
Yeah. But as Brian said the other day,
we nope. Government nope. Schools should be federally
funded. We agree on that. It doesn't change
why it's happening. If you're gonna pull the
funding, then pull all the funding. If you're
gonna pull it from some of them and
give more to others because they then fall
in line, then you are dictating speech through
government. It's the same point. And you're doing
so because of anti semitism. They're not pulling
that punch. They're claiming it's because of anti
semitic actions.
That's what they're saying. Or just anti Semitism
to be specific as she just said. Either
way, unless it's a actual crime,
you know the same point.
This person says, you do realize that universities
have speech codes and codes of conduct. Yep.
Were you making a point, or did I
miss it?
See, the problem is that people conflate these
things. The lack of education
in a lot of this stuff is very
alarming to me today, and I think it's
very deliberate. There's a reason that you never
learn about the fed, for example, in schools
despite being a central part of how this
country works. Why is that? Why don't you
learn about the Rockefellers and Rothschilds despite being
central players in literally everything that's happened in
the last several years? I don't want you
to even mention them, or you roll out
lists of the most wealthy people in in
in whatever, GQ, and they're never mentioned despite
being in that list. It's the point is
there's obvious things that don't get highlighted. Israel
and everything, apparently.
The point in this, though, is that
because of that, people have been drifting away
from understanding that you don't get given rights.
You have inherent rights and so on. Things
like that. In this case, it's about truly
understanding what free speech is. To just ask
basic, brave, it says, free speech is the
right of an individual or community to express
information,
which I'll add is enshrined to the constitution
as an inherent god given right to people
everywhere
and says information, ideas, and opinions without interference
or retaliation from the government.
Okay.
That's not the college. Okay? Unless you wanna
acknowledge where it seems to be going. You
know, the different conversation. The point is, clearly,
you can see there's a difference. Now I'm
not saying it's okay for these colleges to
dictate what you can and can't say. That
would be them respecting the the freedom of
ideological thought in a college.
Different conversation, though. Nonetheless, we can have these
conversations and people would push back, and I
too have. And that's why most of these
places allow, at least they used to, allow
what they're trying to stop.
That's what's so insane about this argument, guys,
is right now, the whole point is about
allowing freedom of thought and ideology. And what
they're trying to do is shut it down
to the guys that they are the ones
doing that.
It is just it's it's schizophrenic to me.
Again, all of it's nonsense because the bottom
line is they're shutting down your ability to
say things that they claim are antisemitic. Regardless
of even if it is, it's still a
censorship.
It's a violation of your free speech.
Now here's
on March 7, Ben Shapiro
or actually, let me take I think that's
actually older. Oh, yeah. It's right here. From
April 2024. Decentered News put this out on
the seventh. It's a clip of Ben Shapiro
breaking down the antisemitic
actions
of these protests. And don't forget, it's very
roundly proven. Jewish voices for peace, and I
think it was what Jewish voices of America.
I forget the first one he said. They're
both but the reason those are both the
two groups we've referenced before, and largely, they're
the ones responsible. I think it was Jewish
Voices for Peace in Colombia that put these
on. And that's why what he does here
is important as he counterbalances it with the
fact that it was not what they said.
I mean, and you could there there are
people wandering around with their cameras. The only
times you saw these inflection points were when
you had these Zionist marches that were constantly
trying to create violence.
That's in my that's my own perception. I'm
sure there's examples that you could find of
Palestinians who were out there trying to do
the do the same. I I because I
believe that. I think that's how this always
goes. My point, though, is in a large
high elevation view, you can look and see
all of the big button points they made,
almost all have been shown to be false,
misrepresented,
outright, or just Palestinian protests being called antisemitism.
Over and over. The flag in the eye,
the marching, you they'll kill all the Jews.
In congress, that cop said, Stefanik, you're wrong
about that. That didn't happen. I investigated, and
she still cites it to this day.
That's what we're dealing with. So here is
Ben trying to make this out to be
for obvious reasons what it's not, and here
is the contrast of people who were there,
Jewish people who were there in a peaceful
circle sharing with Muslims and Christians and calling
for peace in Palestine.
Parties are arresting some people across the country,
but certainly not enough. Flag burning, pro Hamas
Which is protected under the constitution, but he
doesn't care about the constitution. Pro Hezbollah,
anti western radicals taking over these campuses.
Go have some matzah. Come have some matzah
ball soup. We're having a great time. We
got plenty plenty to go for everyone,
and we'll be out here having a really
lovely holiday. As Passover week begins, a group
of Jewish and non Jewish protesters have gathered
at the university to celebrate. There is nowhere
else I should be for Passover besides here
on campus. If you are shouting about the
yihud,
that's a pretty good indicator that antisemitism is
being engaged in.
Passover is the story of And just to
be clear, by the way, in this group,
as we covered on the show, as the
one speaking is a Jewish man, there's other
Jewish people there, but it's an intermixing of
Muslims and Christians and people wearing kifas who
are all singing along because showing respect.
Now, yes, you you could find other groups
that weren't the my point is, this is
central location at Columbia University. To pretend that
this was some hotbed of racism and is
a simple lie and has been roundly shown
to be a lie. People like this don't
care. Guess what? Because they're dishonest.
Our,
escape from slavery in the land of Egypt.
And I think we need to recognize that
on Passover,
it's important to stand up for oppressed people
everywhere, whether they're Jewish or not. I'd see
Yeah. That that's what never again actually means.
In so much so many statements online about
how Jews weren't safe, about how Columbia had
turned into a hotbed of antisemitism. Each of
those statements further galvanized me to use my
voice and my privilege as a Jewish person
to come here and have a Seder with
all of, all of these lovely people.
Again, in a in a environment of antisemitism
has clearly been created on campuses like Columbia
University.
And and see, that's why he showed that.
That is why. Because Ben Shapiro,
I I mean, deliberately dishonestly
conflates Zionism with and with with Judaism.
And, you know, any honest Jew out there
will very clearly tell you whether they believe
in what Zionism is or not, they're not
the same thing. That's just a dishonest argument.
You can argue that I think still dishonestly
that Zionism is about the homeland for the
Jewish people. For sure. If you believe that,
I I don't know. I I feel bad
for you because it's very easy to prove
that's not true. My point is that even
if that's true, there's a lot of Jewish
people in the world that do not identify
with Zionism. So for you to then claim
that that's the only one that then you
are the one being anti Semitic. That or
rather what term would actually represent you being
anti Jewish person because Semite is not the
same thing. The point though is that's why
it's important. Ben Shapiro would say anti Zionist
is anti Semitism. He is part of the
problem.
These people are Jewish people. You could see
it right there. These are Jewish people that
are anti Zionist, and he's calling them racist.
He's calling them trash
because that's the kind of person he is.
There are also many non Jewish students who
joined the Seder, and we're trying to we're
a little bit hesitant about whether they should
eat matzah or not. We told him it
was okay. You can try some matzah. It
was really a beautiful thing to see in
the middle of the pro Palestinian camp.
You're talking about tens of thousands of students
all across the country who are engaged in
pro Hamas rallies waving Hezbollah and Hamas flags.
Nope. The vast majority were very clearly waving
Palestinian flags and promoting Palestinian freedom.
Now you could do all the your best
to conflate that into whatever you want it
to mean. Even if you actually does mean
that in some cases, it's not what he
just said. You think he doesn't know that?
You think he didn't research this and very
easily look at the crowd and show no.
Because they're saying Palestinian flags are Hamas flags,
which show you that we've always been right,
that they think they're all the same thing,
which is why a genocide is clearly happening.
One of the many endless amounts of reasons.
I mean, it the I this is my
opinion,
but you have to understand. With what you
know and look at what you say, this
is a villain, guys. This is a deliberate
act to continue
the murder of an entire people based on
what I can prove to you are lies
he knows are lies.
Now you could at at best, the only
leeway you give him is that he somehow
believes these lies are in the interest of
some out come at the end. A positive
good.
That's a big assumption. That's like assuming that's
what Trump and Elon are gonna do for
you. Same conversation. But the point is with
what's happening on the ground, with the proof,
with the evidence we're presenting,
he knows this, guys.
It just makes me sick. These people exist.
I'm part of a really proud legacy of
progressive Jewish activists who have participated in things
like the civil rights movement or the anti
apartheid movement in the eighties,
where it's so important to us to transcend
the barriers of race, class, ethnicity, religion. And
that's what's happening here today, and there's a
lot of joy here, I think, really, for
the first time on campus in months. These
screaming
teenagers
from intimidating Jewish students on campus
and waving Hamas flags. If you were to
believe American politicians and American mainstream media, you
would think that this campus is a really
dangerous environment now rife with anti Semitic violence.
And here we are in the heart of
the Gaza Solidarity encampment. And right behind me
is a teaching going on about antisemitism,
about the history of antisemitism, the nature of
antisemitism,
how we confront it as part of protests
and social justice movements. So I keep telling
people,
you know, as a Jewish person and as
a person of conscience,
I wouldn't be associating with this protest movement
if I thought that anyone here harbored or
espoused prejudice of any kind. People God, it's
just absolutely
unreal
how much how easy it is to just
forcefully lie about something and have enough momentum
and social media control to just roll over
the top of what's actually going on. It's
happening every day right now. To me, that's
I mean, this is at the like, look.
Let's put it this way. You could make
the argument that Decensored News is just taking
the most benign clips in in comparison to
what Ben Ben is saying. That's not inaccurate.
You don't know for sure, right, unless you
went and did your due diligence, but you
should.
The point is regardless of whether there's a
group right across the street that's screaming, he
is in the center
of the main encampment of what they called
a hot spot of antisemitism,
Ben himself.
And we've shown you three or four different
Jewish people, crowds singing, having antisemitism
teach ins in the middle.
There's no question.
He's misrepresenting this. Now is is it part
is it also possible there's partly a bad
part of this that wasn't shown? Of course,
that's possible. Look into it for yourself. I'd
like to believe that if you truly continue
to look into it, you'd end up finding
out that at worst, you'll find people who
are screaming things that they feel are justified
because they're angry about Israel, but you could
also call it racist. But very, very few
and far between two things because one, it's
nationally not as prevalent they make it out
to be, but also because most of them,
even if they feel that way, which is
sort of a counterintuitive point, to be honest,
but it's accurate,
wouldn't say it out loud because they know
that people like Ben would make it look
that's think about it. So you can stand
back and see that they're just choosing probably
because they decide that they somehow wink wink
know that they hate Jews because Ben's been
so brainwashed, but but I don't believe that.
I think he's the one doing the brainwashing.
Either way, it's clear that he's lying about
what happened. So, again, the bigger point here
is that they're using Israeli spy tech to
spy on these people, American or otherwise, just
like they spied on Americans when Trump's last
administration was in because of red hats. And
it's it's it's not about I think here's
a good point to overlap it with. The
same way they use woke politics and DEI
or they had at the part where it's
necessary
to cover their regime change tactics using USAID
that's now being dismantled to pretend they're fighting
that. Right? It's the same thing here that
they use. Israeli government propaganda uses whatever the
the moment is. So back then and and,
again, the point is about all of us.
Spying, controlling, dictating, infiltrating what's going on in
this country. So during the Trump's last administration,
when it was about the red hats and
the trucker convoys and January 6, what'd they
do? They infiltrate it and they highlighted that
so the Democrats allowed it. They took whatever
they could get, whatever tool that was offered
to go after all those bad guys in
red hats and then spun back around like
Corbett said in the beginning.
And now you got the same people who
was who were highlighted
turning back around and going, now use it
against them. Give me that NSO group. Go
after those evil Democrats. And what does Israel
get? The whole picture.
Burn American flags and flag Hamas flags and
shout from the river to the sea Palestine,
it shall be free. And and shout about
the killing of Jews. It's not a Nope.
Nope. See how quickly you know, that's not
true. I you know, you see, here's what's
interesting. In any I've only seen two or
three of them. And in every single one
of the clips where you see somebody saying
something like, even like we are Hamas, which
I which I would clearly argue there are
some people in this that feel that way.
There's even a valid argument to be made
why they might feel that way. I'm of
the mind because of the evidence of Israel
funding them. That's not an easy thing to
say. But they're, nonetheless, still have a protected
active arm resistance. Those both exist.
But the point is,
wait real quick. What do you say?
From the river to the sea Palestine, it
shall be free and and shout about the
killing Oh, yeah. Right. Right. Right. So the
point being that the videos like that where
you could find even saying, like I said,
with Hamas or somebody out there going, yeah.
You know, the it's all because of the
Jews. You're gonna find that it's either, like,
one random guy with a poorly wrapped kifa
standing by himself when no one else is
with him or a group of people that
seem mysteriously not part of everything that are
all in black's mask and everything else. Now
that doesn't mean that it it very well
still could be part of that. I like,
the point to be objective about this, it's
almost impossible that doesn't exist. In every you're
gonna find a racist person. You're gonna find
a bad a a thief. You're gonna find
in any group people you'll find out there.
It's just it's just statistics. You're gonna find
somebody out there that doesn't care. It's abusing
this.
Evidence shows that's not the majority.
And in large points, you can see that
they're using those to make it look like
everybody else is doing that when what you're
seeing here is what you'll find most. The
measured care the the protest for the end
of war, while Ben is calling them racist
and cheering on genocide. End of Jews. It's
not a new
allegation to say that criticism of the state
of Israel or really any speech about Israel
Palestine that Israeli nationalists don't like is somehow
anti Semitic. People like to say that our
campus has some kind of anti Semitism problem,
and I've really seen no evidence of that.
I think what we have is a situation
where
some people have a free speech problem
with Columbia
University, with universities in general. Some people have
a criticism of Israel problem with the youth
movement in this country. Now Now think about
this in the context of the left right
paradigm. You know how easy it was? Again,
just like James was saying, to set this
up,
you know, from one to the other administration
where you create the the
the I I can't even think of a
bad word.
What the the woke dynamic, DEI, what they
were doing, it's it's it's ridiculous.
You created a situation where they were so
ready to go after how bad it all
was to where they ultimately then go along
with censorship because you're fighting that bad group.
I mean, it's really the same argument as
saying that we're gonna basically suspend or do
things that are unconstitutional
to save the constitution.
Like, I sure you damn well better be
certain about that seeing as how that isn't
even if they're right, maybe somebody stops before
it happens, but you should never be okay
with that. That is it's, it's it's an
oxymoron. It is counterintuitive.
Even if you succeed, like Catherine's been pointing
out, you're cementing a problem that never goes
away, that that's allowable, and it never should
be. So all I'm gonna go ahead and
pause there because we're already long for what
I wanted to get into today. I wanna
spend the rest of the time talking about
the larger direct point about AI government government.
But overall, guys, I mean, there's example I
have other clips that we could show
that that I include here from the actually,
I'll just play a really quick opening part
part of that since you guys have seen
this before.
Gosh. God. What's going on with this platform
today?
There we go.
And this is important
because the these are the kind of people
without actually highlighting it that be that Ben
Shapiro is calling trash.
A holocaust survivor.
My message to the brave student protesters
in America is just keep doing it. Don't
give up. We are doing exactly the same,
and in the long term, we are going
to prevail. I'm out from the beginning at
every March.
Now he went there with other holocaust survivors.
Now I this is an older clip that
I played, then I shared the that Jewish
doctor talking about exclusively killing children by the
IDF. And they also share the the Avi
Shalom clip of him telling you Zionism is
not Judaism and it's racism.
But what's funny about this, so this guy
says, another non Jew dictating to us real
Jews what Judaism, Zionism is. And I just
I just he said he made my point
exactly. Right? So this this is a Jewish
person literally telling you what is and he's
calling him not Jewish because he says something
bad about Judaism. I simply highlighted this guy
or the rest of them are Jewish people.
He's a holocaust survivor.
Alright. The well, this was the wrong one.
There's another one. My let's see if we
can go back.
Oh, well. It doesn't matter. The point wasn't
one of these. And this is usually what
what happens. It's it's kind of a mic
drop. It's these people usually refuse to call
out the holocaust survivor, which rightly so. It's
insane. The point is you point out this
person is there, and they it shows you
that it's more of a it's more of
a shtick. Like, they're trying to manipulate people
using this idea. Either way,
the overarching point as usual is that this
is happening.
They're lying about what's really going on to
suppress speech. And right now, your government is
spearheading that, and too many people in the
partisan field are allowing it. Now all of
this is going to intersect with the next
conversation, which is about how this leads to
not just hiding our descent
of what they're building, but also the infiltration
through that, which is it it's all part
of it. Not not just the information sphere,
but the technological aspect, the artificial intelligence aspect,
the military aspect. These things are all being
slowly, if not rapidly, overtaken in my opinion.
Daniel McAdams highlights this in regard to another
government entity.
The Israeli lobby is trying to cancel Pentagon
deputy press secretary king Kingsley Wilson
because she said Israel should fight its own
wars.
Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson is a prolific
purveyor of anti Semitic conspiracy theories, says the
Jewish insider.
And if it you could read it. She
repeatedly opposed sending US military aid Israel during
its war. She wrote, Israel can fight its
own wars. Think about calling that antisemitic.
It's it that that's the point. They've used
antisemitic to go after anything to criticism of
Israel policy, which is its own example.
And Daniel McAdams says if saying Israel can
fund its own wars is how low the
bar is for being excluded from any job
in politics, that America really is bought and
paid for by in a foreign lobby. Remember
when that used to be I mean, what's
what's his name? Called me a white supremacist
for literally talking about this at a time,
like, months ago. And now I'm seeing even
him somewhat highlight some of these points. It
just shows you how, you know, it's it
it is never easy to jump out and
call something out when no one else is
talking about it. We will always be the
one to do it if we know it's
if we believe it's right.
We'll always do that for you guys. When
we step out, when I know I'm gonna
get hit, flack from everybody.
Even the even the independent media from both
sides, it's always what happens.
Because it's true, it's accurate, not because of
racism or so. It's about the facts that
we can lay out for you. So he
goes on to say, I don't really think
this is the wind that the Israel lobby
thinks it is. Every time they pull this
crap, thousands of people wake up. Now I
agree with that. I think it's because they're
losing control of the narrative, which is why
many of the reasons this is one of
the primary reasons, I think, why this is
being rolled out so rapidly.
Once we enter into this technocratic controlled AI,
you know, influenced reality, this stuff won't matter
anymore. And I it's not my opinion. I
mean, there's a thousand things that have been
written about this that actually, I'll get to
it specifically in the in the article from
conversation
about what this kind of the amount of
data that they're scooping up right now and
what that can effectively do goes so far
beyond privacy.
It it it's it's I'm not trying to
be hyperbolic. It really is a it's a
concerning
even that doesn't do it's it's
terrifying, I guess.
It's it's just the the reality of where
this goes is something that we can see
happening, that the evidence is showing and people
don't wanna acknowledge it. I mean, what else
is that?
But in the conversation of shutting down speech
on campuses, what's embarrassing is vice president JD
Vance on the third says shutting down free
speech will destroy our civilization.
You see, this is the game they play.
Elon Musk shares a tweet or a scree
a meme that makes an argument about the
opposite of what he's doing, and then people
ignore that he's doing it. It's like it's
just lazy reverse psychology.
But it's not new. I mean, he's just
coming out and going, the thing that we're
doing is bad. And they go, well, he's
saying it's bad, so that must not be
what they're doing.
Very simple. The bottom line is they're obviously
censoring, and he said or rather shutting down
free speech. And Arnad says Arnad Tran says
the very same day that they announced illegal
protests in college and universities would not be
would be would be met with imprisonment or
deportation. I mean, it it it writes itself.
It's insane.
See, I would get these words stuck in
my head, and it is that fits. But
it's funny how these words just get stuck
in my head, and I can't get past.
But so I'll include this for you, by
the way, before we continue.
The free speech part of this is important.
Consistency
matters. Now I've never made the argument that
any one of these alone, therefore, proves forever
what the point is. But if you can't
see by now the consistency from 02/2016
to the recent one about the flag burning,
to the Israel should control congress, to the
idea that we're gonna go after criticism of
Israel, this is consistently
anti free speech from Donald Trump.
Consistently,
as far back as you wanna look as
far as I can tell. You could disagree
with that, but I don't know how when
you listen to what they're saying other than
you somehow deciding
that shutting down the Internet without your without
allowing that what he says, I'll let him
say for himself, is calling you stupid for
thinking free speech matters. Or that burning a
a flag of any kind, American or otherwise,
is protected as an act of free speech
roundly by the Supreme Court as Ron Paul
and others have have roundly defended because it
is protected under your rights.
And he's telling you, should be your stupid
for thinking that
or what we're talking about today,
roundly.
Now here are some of the clips I
think are important to hear.
Took the American flag down. They were writing
Hamas on the bell outside of Union Station.
What does a Unverified flag Unverified, by the
way. Down. They were writing Hamas
on the bell outside of Union Station. Someone
did for sure. What does a Donald Trump
do
if he takes office to these people on
the street?
Rarely have we seen anything like this, and
I think you should get a one Except
that happens all the time. Jail sentence if
you do anything to desecrate the American flag.
Now people will say, oh, it's unconstitutional.
Those are stupid people. I don't know how
anybody's not shocked by that. Now just to
be clear, it's the same as the free
speech point. Like, I think Ryan Grim made
a really great, you know, just very clear
statement. Like, it's this is unequivocal
that what they're doing on the campuses are
it's just there's no air in the conversation.
This is the same thing. And we can
have a discussion about whether this should be
the case. Look, I'm sure people have very
well articulated points about why we shouldn't allow
it. The point, though, is that it has
been roundly upheld more than once as
I mean, because it is, by the way.
It's something they can't tell you're not allowed
to burn something that you own. The point
is though because that becomes like a statist
authoritarian thing. But either way about respect or
not, which I argue it's disrespectful. I agree
with that. The point though is that it
is and has been roundly shown protected
as under protected under your constitutional rights.
And for him to say that you're stupid
means that he doesn't care about that or
that he doesn't know, so which would mean
he was stupid. Either way you look at
it, he's wrong.
Or so he's either hiding that by attacking
you for calling the right thing out or
he doesn't even know it himself.
Either way, he's wrong.
I mean, Ron Paul and plenty of other
examples, p p proud like, them leaning into
Ron Paul, Baldung saying, I mean, it's it's
embarrassing. They're using these people. That is unconstitutional,
and he wants to put you in jail
for doing something that has been roundly rather,
it's unconstitutional to put you in jail for
it. This is constitutionally protected action,
roundly seen as such, and he's going after
you for it. Here's the one from 02/2016,
making the same argument, consistency.
Because we're losing a lot of people because
of the Internet, and we have to do
something. We have to go see Bill Gates
and a lot of different people
that really understand what's happening. We have to
talk to them maybe in certain areas closing
that Internet up in some way. Somebody will
say, oh, freedom of speech. Freedom of speech.
These are foolish people.
I mean, I I just don't know how
you miss stuff like that.
I mean, look. Even if you wanna argue
that you're incorrect, to call you stupid or
foolish for caring about free speech when what
they're doing is obviously connected,
it's insulting. And it may it shows you
that these people don't really care about what
they're claiming they fight for.
Right? But here's one that you should remember,
and it's in the same ones right here.
Right? Because what we're gonna show you is
that this is obvious, guys. I mean, you
can't miss what's going on. So not only
did Pam Bondi step out and organize a
task force to prosecute October 7 crimes, Why
explain for me exactly why a US entity
would be prosecuting crimes committed by somebody outside
this country.
I mean, as far as I can tell,
there's not Americans involved that were doing this.
Were there? Are there American members on laws?
If so, no one's told me.
I just don't no. There's no way you
could argue this makes sense.
America First,
please.
Okay. Secondarily,
another one comes out. On the fifth, attorney
general Pam Bondi has opened an investigation into
antisemitism
in California because that's what their focus is.
Not all the things they screamed about, not
all the things they feign to do, they're
immediately acting for here's money, Israel. Here's your
ongoing genocide. We're gonna fight for you fighting
for October 7. We're gonna fight against antisemitism.
We're gonna attack Americans' free speech.
What about the Epstein files?
Yeah. I don't think you're gonna get that
anytime soon. Seeing as how Trump very clearly,
many times, has overlapped with this group as
well as wishing to like to say Maxwell,
you know, wish her well, frankly. Before that,
though, here is what he said in case
you missed it for the hundredth time in
a radio show about Israel controlling congress. Now
this needs to matter for you with what's
currently happening as well as how this artificial
intelligence
infiltration overlap
will play out knowing that this is how
he feels. As well as, again, the other
11 different clips of him openly telling you
he's gonna censor American speech for Israel.
You know, the biggest change I've seen in
congress is Israel
literally owned congress. You understand that ten years
ago, fifteen years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And I think you know exactly what
I what I'm saying.
They had such power. Israel had such power
and rightfully
over congress.
That's crazy.
So
all of this happening, you may wonder why
we're not getting the Epstein files, you know,
aside from the very obvious that just need
to be mentioned.
It's possibly just because they're all interconnected to
this, and I I'm very much of the
mind that all of them are. Like, the
the joke made by anybody who's
not at least even if they're partisan, who's
objective and has a brain,
is that the only reason you would claim
national security for what's going on here is
because there's judges and and and politicians and
people that are tied to this, which is
exactly what this was about. And if that's
the case,
there's only one way to look at that.
Either they're covering for all the Democrats you
think that only is a part
is a party to, or
they're well, I guess there's three things. Either
they're covering for all the Democrats,
or guess no. I I guess there's only
two, or they're covering for republicans that are
on that list. And either way, I haven't
seen any democrat. My point is, as you
know, is that this is the government, guys.
This left right paradigm is is an illusion
to keep you thinking you're winning every four
years.
The reality is that your government is influenced
by this. We can see that in Trump's
administration and Biden's administration.
Here's what he had to say about Ghislaine
Maxwell. Question. It's a little bit, different topic,
but it's one that a lot of people
are talking about.
Ghislaine
Maxwell is in prison, and so a lot
of people wanna know if she's going to
turn in powerful people. And I know you've
talked in the past about prince Andrew,
and, you've criticized Bill Clinton's behavior. I'm wondering,
do you feel that she's going to turn
in powerful men? How do you see that
working out? I don't know. I haven't really
been following it too much.
I just wish her well, frankly.
I've met her numerous times over the years,
especially since I lived in Palm Beach, and
I guess they lived in Palm Beach.
Can you not recognize how dishonest that just
was?
Like, just this is what people choose not
to see.
This is deliberate, like, like, clumsy dishonesty.
Now you could you could argue it's just
because he just doesn't want there to be
any scene connection whether or not he actually
did any crimes or on Epstein Island. That's
also possible. Right? That he just he's associated
with them and and never actually did anything
wrong, but doesn't want that to be taken
out of contact. Like, that seems like a
possible point. I I argue that it seems
more likely that they were involved like everybody
else. But the point is either way, he's
trying to hide something. And it could just
be that he doesn't want you to know
that he went there. But listen to this
again. Powerful people. And I know you've talked
in the past about prince Andrew,
and, you've criticized Bill Clinton's behavior. I'm wondering,
do you feel that she's going to turn
in powerful men? How do you see that
working out? I don't know. I haven't really
been following it too much. I just wish
her well for Obviously, like I said before,
I I believe that that's possible. I I
think he knows well because he knows him
and has been pictured with him, like, eight
times that he's following it. I think that's
obvious, but this is the most important part.
Frankly,
I've met her numerous times over the years.
Okay. He's met him new he's met her
numerous times
over the years. And he says, especially since
I live in lived in Palm Beach. Like,
so pointing back,
I met her many times because I live
in Palm Beach. The only way to take
that in faith that this the what it
means is because they live there.
Right? Especially since I live there, where they
also live. For him to then follow that
up by saying as if he didn't know,
oh, I guess they apparently do live there
too. It literally contradicts what he just said.
The only reason he would say especially since
I live there is because you know that
they live there and that's why you bumped
into them while you live there. To act
like right now you find out they live
there is just a I mean, like, I
don't it's it's just to show a bunch
of intelligence. Like, you just you can't recognize
that that contradicts what you just said.
Powerful men. How do you see that working
out? I don't know. I haven't really been
following it too much. I just wish her
well, frankly.
I've met her numerous times over the years,
especially since I lived in Palm Beach, and
I guess they lived in Palm Beach. Oh,
you guess? Are you uncertain? Seeing as how
you lived there, went alongside them and saw
them many times because they lived there, but
now you guess they live there?
It's a small point, but my god, how
people can't see through
the clumsy
the way he talks, the way he sidesteps
things, gives you no nonsensical
point that people assume at? I mean, I
guess, you know, maybe he's smarter than I
think, and he that's it's working for him,
apparently. Seems crazy. But I wish her well.
Whatever it is, I don't know the situation
with prince Andrew. Just don't know. Not aware
of it.
I mean, it's just lie after lie after
lie, guys. You can look back and prove
he's lying, by the way. But, yeah, I'm
sure it'll all come out in time.
But here
is the next part I wanna talk about.
Now we're getting into this for main reason
about calling this stuff out, especially under when
it comes to Doge and what they're doing
is just the the new conspiracy theory. Right?
Oh, you're black pilled.
It's lazy, and it's just a way to
disregard information, especially since we're fundamentally the opposite
of that. But a great conversation
with some really good people in the conversation
by James Corbett,
and it's called James Corbett and Friends Deliver
the White Pill. And, basically, he asked us
all to kinda break down our opinions about
this. And, you know, I'm I'm I have
a slightly different opinion of certain things around
this, but it's important to watch because the
real point is what we're always talking about.
That there's a lot of people out here
who are trying to highlight the fact that
you are the only one that's truly gonna
save you. You are your own solution, that
you need to wreck and or even just
calling out things that we can prove our
problems and get called black pill because we're
not hoping for the best. Like, the reality
is you've been turned into thinking the white
pill is ultimately the black pill.
Right? You and and and invert inverted thinking
that by you going well, it's the best
we're gonna get is somehow not obviously giving
up. But it's a good conversation even though
it's been done to death in the in
the current, like, partisan post Trump discussion. What
we do in here is really break down
some points that I think are very relevant.
And thank you, James, yet again, for continuing
to have your finger on the pulse of
this.
But what he highlights in here, I just
wanna include that because we discussed it,
is something he mentions that really stands out
to me. He makes he he makes a
point about what's called algocracy,
government by algorithm. And as always, James Corbett
ahead of the curve.
I didn't know about this word, and I
looked it up, and it's very interesting because
I believe this is where we are.
Not just where we're going, where we are,
which I don't even think is that hard
to recognize whether and that doesn't have to
mean artificial intelligence unless you just wanna kinda,
I mean, today, that term has become so
broad, you know, whether we're talking about, like,
a sentient general intelligence or, you know, it
it's it's just it's kinda muddled today. My
opinion is that an algorithm is just, you
know, it's just code,
which at least which is accurate. And the
artificial intelligence is something different. But either way,
the point
is, this is a step in that direction.
And my point is that right now, we
are using
computer programs or code to ultimately decide, which
is not that contentious.
Right? Outcomes. You know, use it to decide
what's the most logical path. The question becomes,
are we at a point where that is
deciding what happens?
Whether it's because of somebody who is guiding
us with a program or because that program
has been decided it or maybe it is
because it's artificial intelligence, and that's guiding our
actions.
This is a real thing.
What level I just discussed, that's where we
had to decide. I think we're at a
point where what's happening under Elon Musk and
Doge and Trump is the in earnest, the
real rollout that we weren't supposed to know
about until later when they you know,
introduce you to what's been going on for
ten years.
They're they're testing AI government. Now I when
I I recently had a great interview
with Charlie Robinson about a lot of things,
and one that came up was about and
I I wrote AI governance, and I didn't
change it. I think it technically applies. But
when you look up AI governance,
I guess the actual definition more so applies
to the the governance of the
AI system as opposed to what I meant
was more so artificial intelligence government.
But both are in the same wheelhouse. But
I but no. I think more specifically, I
titled today AI government.
But great conversation. Charlie and I are gonna
be connecting on a regular basis because I
just I love our conversations. It's always we
have different opinions on plenty things and different
kind of like the point is I think
we always have a a like a what's
the right word? I always forget the word.
You know, when we we discuss things, we
kinda come to some new ideas together. I
always enjoy them. So we're gonna we're kinda
oh, and we're gonna be connecting at the,
the the birthday party carnival while we're there.
We're gonna do a little mini podcast together
because it's right about the same time. But
I look forward to that. But the point
was in this, we discussed some interesting things.
Blockchain
being presented as sort of like the solution
to all problems from the inner circle of
Trump, which is not surprising to me. This
but even the we didn't get into it
more. I forgot to make the follow back
up on the point.
But I may I said in the show
that I could make an argument for why
there's a positive side to that. But my
just to be clear on that, right now,
whether or not I see ways that could
be used to benefit us, I'm very, very
worried or
resistant
to it being done because I'm right now,
I think is the way it's going.
It's it's like suggesting that there's positive outcomes
to anything that are still being used against
us, like Neuralink, for example. Right? It worries
me how that's being used. But my point
was simply that, like I've said a long
time ago, that blockchain technically, if it's used
and not like, this it gets into overlap
of, like, the the whether Bitcoin's block the
chain is the accurate one or whether there's
already,
51%
CPU power that can manipulate that. Like, I
think we've been driven in a way where
it can be manipulated, which is why it's
being used as a strict strategic reserve as
opposed to something that undermines the financial system,
which is the way it was designed.
So my point is that overall, we can
see that
blockchain,
if used in an on a system that
is actually accountable,
could be possibly used by the masses to
keep the government accurate
as opposed to the reverse. Today, it's being
built in a way that's being used by
them for, which I it's just we're being
manipulated, in my opinion. I think it's very
obvious under the guise of more transparency, on
efficiency, and so on. Watch this for that
conversation. We get into it. It's very interesting.
Oh, and I wanna point this out. As
I was getting started, Tim Hincliff, King, Tim
Hincliff
posted this. And I I I didn't have
the time to grab it because I was
just about to go start go live. But
remember, we talked about the e the executive
order of Doge, which all it really did
was actually, that might be the way to
find it.
Hold on.
Digital services.
No. It's not popping up.
This is just the article that came up,
but, yeah, it says Trump's second inauguration.
The United States Digital Service is now Doge.
Oh, maybe they have it right here. Oh,
here it is.
Nice. That got us there. Alright. So here's
what I'll include this for the show notes.
It'll be at the bottom.
And this is the executive order. So now
I'll just I'm I'll read it from his
his,
comments, but it's all right here.
Establishing and implementing the president's Department of Government
Efficiency.
Don't forget,
all they really did was re rename
the Obama
unit the US digital services. So more digital
ID or digital control. It's the same. It's
exactly what it looks like. That that in
using this kind of weird way they did
this and pretending he's just an adviser, they
made sure that nobody could be accountable for
anything.
Like, there's just no oversight or anything. It's
it's it is
deliberate, especially with all that we can see,
the Israel
influence, if not control. I mean, how do
we not ask that question about what's not
being seen? Why don't we get that transparency
from the most transparent administration?
It's it is schizophrenic.
But so what he said, don't forget.
The executive order establishes the Department of Government
Efficiency to implement the president's DODGE agenda by
modernizing
federal technology and software to maximize government efficiency.
Efficiency movement being the precursor to the technocracy
movement. Maybe it's the coincidence. I don't think
so. And also, his point is that they're
using
technology, AI. The USDS administrator shall commence with
USDS being digital services or Doge, what they
change it to,
commence a software modernization initiative to improve the
quality and efficiency of government wide software,
network infrastructure,
and IT systems.
And this point, new world order, great reset,
fourth industrial revolution, intelligent age. Like, these are
the steps that we all saw coming. And
just because it's being rolled out by people
that you see you think are on your
side, people are pulling their punches.
Just so you can see it.
Come in, say software modernization. So thank you,
Hank Cliff, Tim, for pointing this out. It's
important to know that this is what they
told you it would be. Now
the Doge administrator is an interesting point in
all this. I just wanna passingly highlight this,
that this is what got me thinking about
this mostly,
is that ultimately, we have a situation where
they were being told that somebody else is
in charge. And the only reason I think
they're doing this little tap dance
deception is because, ultimately,
it was because Elon Musk is the one
making decisions.
That is illegal as an adviser or rather
not illegal, but the the one having authority
and carrying out action. Understanding the route the
an adviser
is advising.
Somebody with authority, whether Trump or whoever's actually
in the position, who they claim is Amy
Gleeson,
who's actually somebody from a previous administration who
worked as sort of an second tier underling
or if not one of the top people
at the previous digital services.
Now they changed Doge,
and, apparently, she's back as the administrator. But,
I mean, I can't even verify that she's
even actually doing this other than the fact
that her LinkedIn says that she did back
in the last administration for digital services. I
haven't even seen that. It's very weird.
And remember that they refused to say her
name. Kaylee,
Leavitt wouldn't say it,
as well as the fact that they're not
want to tell you the names of people
who work there. And then in a court
document, it comes out that
it's not Elon Musk even though Trump says
he's in charge in front of congress, which
might create a legal problem for him.
And so my point was, how does this
make sense? How does all of this line
up? Do they just want us to be
jumping at shadows? Possibly.
Or is it something else?
Is it that this is not even Elon?
Is it that they're actually rolling out some
kind of artificial government government governance,
you know, situation?
And this is the way they keep it
opaque, so we don't really recognize that. It's
just a complete
hypothetical conversation. Now what's not hypothetical
is the coming conversation, if not action, of
using AI for government.
Now just whether they're doing it now through
Doge is a separate conversation of whether it
is coming, and they're doing they're talking about
it. So those things are overlapping because I
can prove to you that through this administration,
they are rolling out AI systems for the
government. So it's one step removed.
I'm just simply wanting you to ask whether
this is already what they're doing with this
literal artificial intelligence
or piloting that like they're doing in Gaza
with Palantir
and Lavender and Habsora
or like they're doing in in Honduras with
the Palantir overlapped,
what's it called now? I'm blanking on it.
Prospera.
It's it's a it's a supposedly freedom city,
the material investment that is a technocratic nightmare,
or just Gaza itself for that matter that's
being run by artificial intelligence control or, you
know, these are not this has been going
on a long time.
So I just wanna highlight that. Here is
her actual
LinkedIn. If you wanna look forward, it still
says digital services, which is strange. I I
mean, wouldn't she have updated that right now
if she's the administrator of one of the
most talked about things in this country?
Sure seems strange to me, doesn't it? But
then you can go down and it simply
downstairs here. It says 25 to present,
United States Digital Service.
Okay. Why does it still say digital service
if it says 25 to present?
Anybody confused about that? And it only says
senior adviser.
Isn't that interesting? So there's only one of
two things happening here. Either Elon Musk is
in charge and that's technically illegal because he's
only an adviser,
or, you know and that's how they're avoiding
him having to be show accountability or divest
for his companies, even though it's quite obvious
that he's in charge and Trump even said
that publicly.
And as she literally lists herself as an
adviser when she's supposed to be the administrator.
It just guys, this is it's nobody would
feel feel good about any of this.
If your only excuse is because they have
to hide things from the Democrats, then you're
lost. You are I mean, you are blindly
accepting whatever they tell you because you hate
whatever they painted for you,
even if it's accurate. I mean, you're it's
just it's incredible that people can be played
like this.
This is concerning to me. Now here is
the article.
Who is Amy Gleason? The person named Doge's
acting administrator by the White House. Here's what
it says.
The White House on Tuesday afternoon identified Amy
Gleason as the acting leader of Doge, which
has been pushing agencies to fire employees, cancel
contracts, and make other cuts.
So if that's the case, why would she
have that name? And why would it be
25 to president? And why would she not
be publicly speaking?
Like, I'm starting to wonder if Amy Gleeson
is even a real thing. And I'm I'm
kind of being facetious in a way, but
it's like, what is this?
This is although Doge's cuts have been championed
by Elon Musk and his associates, the White
House has insisted
that Musk is overseeing the effort as a
senior adviser,
not an employee.
That's how they sidestep the accountability.
The identity
of who is technically running Doge, they claim,
has been a mystery from the most transparent
administration, from the most transparent part of the
government, we're being told repeatedly.
Even though an executive order signed by Trump
last month called for the appointment of an
administrator to report to the White House. A
government lawyer on Monday told a judge that
he didn't know who was that person, and
the White House press secretary, Karian Leavitt, had
declined to identify who it was in the
middle of a press briefing.
Somebody told her not to, whether to cause
ruckus or because there was some undecision.
No. Not clear what they wanted to say
just yet. There are career officials, it says,
and there are political appointees who are helping
run Doge on day to day basis, she
said. Gleason, fifty three, worked from 2018 to
2021, so to be clear, into Biden's administration
under the digital services, an agency that has
been renamed to Doge according to her LinkedIn
profile, even though that's not what her LinkedIn
profile says. So why would Associated Press say
that?
Her LinkedIn profile I just showed you.
See what I'm saying? Like, so there's some
kind of coordinated effort here to make this
seem like something it's not. It's even the
small details.
And it goes on to say, according to
a profile, in that role,
under both Trump and Biden, she worked with
the White House on the federal response to
the coronavirus pandemic.
To in the interim, she had been working
as the chief product officer at two small
Nashville based health care startups, interesting, Russell Street
Ventures and Main Street Health. Both companies were
founded by health care entrepreneur Brad Smith who
worked in the first Trump administration in several
key health care roles.
Russell Street Ventures website has recently been deleted.
But the company has called itself an innovative
health care firm focused on launching and scaling
companies that serve some of the nation's most
vulnerable and underdeserved,
underserved patient populations.
Interesting.
Well, in case you wanna look further, I'm
not gonna focus on it now. Here's a
post from Tennessee entrepreneur Brad Smith launching Russell
Street Ventures. The website is now deleted.
Here is the wave, this is the Crunchbase
showing you worked alongside them.
There's nothing, you know,
bombshell. There's Gleeson right there, chief product officer.
Just thought it was interesting.
Here's some of the one of the things
that stood out. At the White House, Brad
helped or operationalize various elements of the federal
response to COVID nineteen.
Interesting overlap to all of this. Testing across
the country. I'd see my point is I
think what was happening there was a combination
of experiments, and one of them was data
collection. As you can see, Oracle using with
Larry Ellison and Stargate, they're using that data
for the new rollout of the injection, so
they claim, probably for everything else too.
And it says launching project air bridge, which
shipped billions of medical supplies from around the
world to America. You know, things that we
now know hurt us like masks and ventilators.
But it says Brad also served as the
board of a a board member of Operation
Warp Speed, helping develop COVID vaccines in record
time, guys.
So this guy starts a company where she
is leading a product development
and then deletes I mean, there's something strange
in all of this. Now like I said,
this is just supplementary information. Decide for yourself.
At HHS, Brad launched innovative payment models that
lowered the price of prescription drugs and allowed
rural communities to transform how health care is
delivered.
You get the sense there might be some
kind of artificial intelligence part and all that?
Now it says Brad graduated summa cum laude
from Harvard University and received an m, Phil
from Oxford University where he was a Rhodes
Scholar, which, you know, might be relevant to
somebody.
Oh, here's the website. It it was deleted,
but here's the Web App Machine in case
you wanna look into it. So my point
is about Amy Gleason
and this kind of opaque situation of who's
actually calling the shots.
So let's just consider the fact that it
might be a combination
or entirely something like a program.
So this is from g zero saying Elon
Musk's government takeover is powered by artificial intelligence.
Musk isn't just seizing control of the executive
branch. He's using artificial intelligence as his weapon
of choice. Now that's obviously what they're framing.
Think of it. Think for yourself. Don't, you
know,
don't consider only partisan ideas of whether the,
you know, whether he's taken over the presidency
and act like that's some democrat response.
May maybe the reality, maybe not. Consider all
the points. The point is what we do
know is that he's seizing a lot of
power in ways that make a lot of
people uncomfortable,
who in many cases are not it's not
about, like, you know, the peep peep when
I say that to be clear, I'm not
talking about other government officials. I'm talking about
people that care about consolidation of power, who
care about
independence, liberty,
constitutional rights.
But on top of that, there's also a
lot of people that I think are unconcerned
about the shifting of power in the way
it goes in the world.
But it's weird that we can see very
specific entities that don't really have a problem
with it.
But it says at the education department,
Doge representatives
have reportedly fed sensitive data,
including personally identifiable student loan information,
into artificial intelligence software through Microsoft's
Azure cloud service. Of course.
So this is this is clearly happening that
they're using AI data, which we've already talked
about, or data from your information in the
government databases
to train their models.
Now the fact that they're using Microsoft's Azure
cloud service just makes it that much more
ridiculous,
especially since Microsoft has a significant connection to
unit a two hundred, an Israeli military intelligence
unit. LinkedIn data shows that at least
a 66
former,
which we know that's not how this works,
unit age hundred members are currently employed at
Microsoft,
indicating a strong recruitment pipeline from the from
that one unit
into Microsoft.
That's like saying CIA pipeline. I would say,
no. They're all retired CIA agents.
Would you be okay with that? That's outrageous.
So just that alone is enough.
Overall, it's not just goo it's not just
Microsoft, but Google, Facebook, Microsoft, you get in
the bigger picture. Former Israeli spies in every
field are working to the top of these
situate, and it's public information.
Or DARPA selects Microsoft to continue the development
of their unity
scale quantum computery. So all of this comes
together. Then we're gonna come back to DARPA,
but realize how all of this is in
the same technocratic Zionist direction.
But
using your personal information to train these models
through The U the Israeli controlled entity. It
says a group of students from the University
of California have now sued Doge in federal
court on Friday for allegedly violating federal privacy
rules and exceeding their statutory authority. I don't
think it's allegedly at all. I just think
they don't I think they have the power
right now to stop anything from happening. This
is on February 11, by the way, so
it's about a month old.
And it says, additionally, congressional Democrats have demanded
answers about allegations of a private server used
at the office of ban personal management. Federal
workers have sued to stop this while o
eight PM officials deny and violates the law.
Weird way to frame that.
Demand that answers about allegations.
These aren't allegations as even their next sentence
makes clear, and you and I already talked
about this. The Trump and Elon Musk, or
rather the Trump administration,
right away, pushed back on all of that.
And part of that was that transition, was
part of the ethics pledges and all of
that. But one of them was using the
offices for the transition,
for the the servers and everything. Then they
said, no. We're gonna use our own personal
stuff. And it already turned out that they
already had one potential hack. There are all
sorts of things happening in regard to security.
Or, really, the point my point is, I
don't think they I think the same with
the issue. I think they're in a situation
now where it's complete
unfettered access to whoever they want to have
access to because it's in personal servers.
How we ever allowed that is beyond me.
How anybody Okay. This is my point. Don't
you think democrat dem dem democrats.
Democrats,
not just a couple of these individuals, but
the entire deep state we're told would scream
about them doing well, no. Because they don't
care. Because they're okay with it because it's
in the interest of Israel,
which is the real but, you know, the
picture is your government being played here, not
one side fighting the other.
The fact that they were able to move
information, which we'll get to more in a
second in the other article, to a private
location.
I mean, think about all the screening about
Clinton and and Biden and all these documents
and file.
Now this is okay? Trillion
dollar databases move because that's convenient?
It's just it is insane
that works more than ever there that people
can't see the contradiction in that logic.
But it says, and federal judge on Saturday
temporarily halted Doge access to taxpayer information at
the treasury department
because the judge wrote, it risks disclosure of
sensitive and confidential information, and the heightened risk
of the systems in question will be more
vulnerable than before to hacking, which he was
right about because it happened. And on top
of that, we can already see
that the the overlap, the disclosure, they already
said that came out. It was I think
it was Newsweek, the leaked article, the first
couple weeks of this, where they said somebody
said, well, that's gonna violate privacy. And they
said, well, we'll we're gonna start anyway. We'll
we'll have to deal with that one. Like
like a afterthought. Sort of like take the
guns first, do process later. That's the way
they view your rights, guys.
All of your government, by the way.
Now it says, at the General Services Administration,
a former Tesla engineer
is pushing an AI first strategy
that involves building a custom chatbot called a
s GSAI
to help draft memos faster and adopting an
AI coding agent such as the popular assistant
Cursor to assist with software developments.
You've literally got a person who worked for
Elon Musk. Who knows what that really means?
If if maybe only just that he worked
for Elon Musk and is more has allegiance
to him, who is working
apparently for an adviser. We see the point
is it's so obvious to see that this
does not make sense. They're lying to everybody,
and everyone's letting it happen.
But the point is that you're now using
his background systems you know, people he's worked
with, his team
to push AI first strategies using custom built
chatbots
for general services ministry, a massive, massive entity.
I this is it my point is it's
already happening. They're rolling this stuff out or
creating coding specific to the how do we
know what's going into this sense when people
aren't checking?
I think I think it's the privacy act.
The point is there's there's supposed to be
databases where they're logging every single thing they
do. They're not doing that.
Even though that got called out by Handy
in regard to what the FBI might be
doing behind the scenes or on the s
Epstein conversation,
both should matter.
Yes. What the current
Trump FBI is doing behind the scenes of
the Trump administration should be logged, but also
what they're doing everywhere else should be the
important conversation.
But we don't get to know.
Talking about infiltration and backdoor access, my god.
Ladies and gentlemen, there's a huge issue here.
Even if it's not happening, the fact that
we don't know whether it is is incredible
to me.
And on the note of the chatbot, we're
gonna come back to it in a minute,
about one that they're already rolling out using
Grok on Twitter.
But it says, Collie Schroeder, senior counsel at
the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said there's also
the risk that AI gobbles up sensitive data
and helps train its models on that data.
Yeah. That's already happening. We'll get to that
in a minute. Many AI systems use input
data to expand their training datasets in addition
to using it to generate a prompt response.
She says, this not only means security risks
if the raw training data is exposed, which
already happened,
but also puts the the data at risk
for further misuse.
Now that that's even that's with oversight. Now
imagine if there's just literally no oversight. We
don't even know there's a problem.
Now as the Schroeder noted that these revelations
raised fundamental questions about government security protocols if
Doge is indeed using
unsecured systems,
which I actually find hard to believe, but
maybe that's the whole point.
The point is we don't know. And the
fact that we're not allowed to, I don't
know why that doesn't raise red flags. It
says any halfway responsible business or organization
has many security procedures and policies
about what product you can you you can
and cannot connect with company devices.
They said it appears that our government either
does not meet this incredibly basic level of
responsibility
and good practice, or no one is enforcing
existing policies and procedures.
The education department claims that there's nothing to
worry about with regard to Doge staff overhauling
the department's systems. And they said, quote, they
have been sworn in, have the necessary background
checks and clearances, and are focused on making
the department more cost efficient, efficient, and accountable,
and doing what they said they would do.
Okay.
Sure. That means nothing to me. So they
were sworn in by the other criminals. They
were background checked by the other Zionist you
know, the point is all of that is
the government, guys. So you're telling me the
government is who I think is all the
only way this would make a difference is
if you think it's Democrats versus Republicans.
And that's how they play it every time.
The reality to me is that your government
is overhauling a system with people that are
not actually being
for again, they're they are on private servers.
There's no oversight. There's no ethic
ethics spludges or or background. I mean, in
regard to these the administrative people. And on
top of that, the people that he's bringing
underneath him are not giving all those things.
See, this is the problem.
The entities that are working under Elon Musk,
as far as I can tell, have not
gone through any of that. They say that,
but that's not done through some government process.
That's what Elon Musk claiming they've done their
due diligence.
Maybe it has. I don't know why we
blindly believe that unless you are worshiping a
hero.
Sworn in, necessary background checks, and focused on
making it better, so they claim. There is
nothing inappropriate or nefarious going on.
It's a weird thing to say. Obviously, you
know, it's doth protest too much. But my
point, obviously, is whether they even know that.
Why do you because they're sworn in. They
had background checks. It's all good. Right? Well,
maybe some of them are working for somebody
else. Maybe some of them are doing something
they shouldn't be doing. I mean, the idea
that it's just because they're there, they're the
right thing, so nothing wrong is happening is
a is a self fulfilling prophecy.
But it says, but a lack of transparency
has pervaded the entire must take over without
comprehensive congressional oversight.
And with those staffers at times refusing to
even give their names while interrogating civil servants.
They they they feel they're so far above
right now. It's incredible to me.
And in many ways, they are. Like, like,
you know, think about giving someone, like, some
somebody completely wrapped up in the kind of
Elon Musk ecosphere
who's 25 years old, who's following all the
same sycophants on Twitter, who gets access to
stuff like this.
And then is not is, like, refusing to
give his name to somebody who's demanding answers
from who's, like, a 40 and I'm not
saying these people even deserve respect. Most of
them are criminals, if not all of them.
My point is just think about the absurdity
that it all makes sense because we all
don't like the government. What you're doing is
the same thing. You're stepping in with the
same lack of accountability, the same lack of
honesty, and just being cheering it on because
the Democrats suck.
I mean, I just don't know why we
will fall for this.
And it says, we deserve lawful, transparent, and
accountable decisions in government operations.
Now here
is where this goes for me. Now remember,
the Microsoft overlap, which is what they're using.
Right? That's the point at the beginning of
the article. They're using Microsoft Azure for this
entire process.
Now don't forget, by the way, back even
BlackRock funding this, you have
Elon Musk rolling out his xAI, which is
a DARPA program that ended right before he
took over Twitter and then ultimately changed the
name that they had, which was xAI. Explainable
AI, DARPA's program becomes Elon Musk, xAI, totally
not the same thing. They literally don't want
you to think the same thing even though
the months passed. I mean, it was end
of like, months before he took over Twitter,
they ended this program about explainable
AI. He buys it, turns it to x,
starts xAI, and AI, and it's the same
thing. You can even look on Twitter where
it says explain this post. It's the same
thing.
Just like Palantir is the extension of the
government operation. It's the same these are front
men in my opinion. This is the same
problem. So AI is rolling out through the
people you think are fighting all this stuff.
And Trump rolls out his AI powered mRNA
platform, Stargate pro I mean, it's it's all
obvious. Now even if you think these aren't
connected, the problem is if you or rather
the question should be asked, if there is
infiltration, especially since we don't get to prove
that because there's no oversight and there's no
no information,
is it not possible that these things are
exactly part of this larger problem? Or maybe
they don't even know that
as the infiltration seems to be ubiquitous.
Now Trump has made it clear.
President Trump takes action to enhance AI leadership
for The United States. This has been a
focal point of their entire administration.
That that is obvious.
So here are some overlapping points.
Mario Notfall, of course, you obviously know this
is just this guy swinging right around the
whole Elon Musk conversation.
They it's it's this ecosphere that's obvious.
AI schools are here, he says, and they're
changing education.
Did we we're just talking about education?
Unbound Academy AI driven virtual school. Okay. My
point is only to make and then this
is my point. Here's Elon Musk.
That's already possible.
Oh, look. Pomerul, lucky.
Right? Of course it is. Anduril,
Oculus,
Palantir.
Oh, I mean, Whitney's talked about Pomerul, lucky
many times. The point that it's these are
going AI education. Elon Musk goes, it's already
here. And then what do you know? Because
it's totally not an open pipeline. He polls
points out how it's, oh, it's here. AI
education. Okay. Maybe you don't think it's a
problem. Maybe you're okay with it. Maybe with
everything we've discussed so far,
realize that this is not just a cord
a a coincidental
series of actions. This is being rolled out.
You can see it.
My question is on top of that, well,
one, is that okay with you?
Isn't that the great reset? Isn't that exactly
what we all thought we were fighting? And
secondarily,
is there somebody else
pulling the strings here?
And then and and we're rolling out AI
influence when through that AI influence, they're dictating
your mindset.
Or oh, and then, by the way, just
to make sure we're clear on this, here's
Elon Musk and them going, AI schools. Oh,
well, guess what? Here's World Economic Forum
twenty eighteen.
Forty schools in China teaching with AI courses.
Oh, also the WEF is on our side
now? Unity party? Is that what we're doing?
How long until that happens? No. They're they're
every single thing they're rolling out this administration
is something the World Economic Forum has been
proud proudly putting forward.
Here, Ramas one two three four highlights Palantir
talking about AI for hospitals. The link is
right here for you. It's a he says,
gee, nothing like combining a killing machine with
an AI driven care op.
Great point.
Well, here is World Economic Forum twenty twenty
four. Boosting health care capacity with artificial intelligence.
I mean, these aren't even con these are
very public. This has been coming coming for
a long time. My point is it's funny
how people who were fighting this can't see
the same thing as Elon rolls the same
thing out with the same name.
K. Here's Elon Musk suggesting Grock. You know,
he's artificial intelligence having a role in health
care.
Who could have seen that coming?
Same point. Not so not not with the
larger the I mean, this is about specific
health care like AI medicine. We've talked about
that too. That was right in that was
sustainable development goals, World Economic Forum.
Four ways AI is improving health care according
to one of the world's largest medical groups,
World Economic Forum.
Or AI and health care, buckle up for
change, but read this before the takeoff. That's
later, 2024.
Okay. Here is Newsweek. This is from March
7.
Elon Musk, Doge, tried to fire air traffic
controllers report. Now we we've already seen this
conversation.
This I mean, whether it's even the ones
they fired for the bird flu point and
fired them all back. The point is they're
trying to they're changing all this stuff that
I think in many ways to make it
out of control. So the obvious solution to
them is the artificial intelligence solution,
problem, reaction, solution. But here we are, where
they're trying to mix this all up. And
we've they've already I've seen many different people
around that sphere already float the idea of
artificial intelligence for this to the point to
where there's articles being written about why that's
not possible. Like, that's how mainstream it's become.
It's all right in front of you guys.
And so on that note, I'd like to
play a great clip that Craig Reese put
out, who, by the way, I believe is
gonna be joining us at the birthday party
as well as the carnival. Oh, great to
meet him. I respect his work.
Check it out. This is important.
The US has been having a problem lately
with airplane and helicopter crashes. An LAPD helicopter
made an emergency landing. Two officers on board.
Here's what we know. LAPD says one of
its air support unit helicopters was doing a
training exercise at the Los Alamitos training base
when it had a minor training incident around
one this afternoon.
As a result, that pilot had to do
an emergency landing.
Plane crash on a South Texas highway injured
four people. Yeah. That plane hit several cars
when it landed on the access road of
a highway in Victoria, Southeast of San Antonio.
The plane crash happened in an intersection
adjacent to a freeway overpass.
Pieces of the aircraft damaged three vehicles on
the ground. Video initially showed the plane split
at the fuselage.
Both the Federal Aviation Administration
and the National Transportation Safety Board looking into
what caused the crash. Pilot is dead following
a plane crash in Adams County. That's according
to the Ohio State Highway Patrol currently out
there on the scene. The plane was a
private aircraft. It went down in a wooded
area near Savage Road in Bratton Township. This
all happened around 03:30PM. The Federal Aviation Administration
and the National Transportation Safety Board planned to
investigate the crash. We now have an FAA
report that a military helicopter and a regional
jet have collided,
near Reagan National Airport. Yeah. You can see
the moment of impact down there toward the
bottom right hand side of your screen. That's
another plane taking off at the time. But
when the camera zooms back out, you're gonna
see that explosion,
in just a moment. There it is right
there. So again and you can see.
Another plane has crashed in another American city.
And this time, it is Philadelphia. A twin
engine medevac jet took off from a local
airport on route to Missouri.
That plane reached 1,600 feet after takeoff before
plunging,
11,000
feet per minute. Here is another look at
the crash as it happened.
Fighter jet crash in Alaska. We're learning more
about the crash and the pilot who survived.
Here's ABC's Lionel Moyse. Video circulating online shows
the F35
crashing at Eielson Air Force Base in Alaska.
The pilot ejecting safely. Yet another community is
heartbroken.
Residents in Nome saying it's very tight knit.
Everyone is affected by this in some way,
and now investigators are focused on figuring out
why this happened.
This morning, the US Coast Guard releasing this
photo of the mangled wreckage of the plane
that vanished over open water in Alaska.
Three bodies of the 10 on board recovered.
This is out of Wilmington, North Carolina,
and we are told that, Novant Health is
now confirming a medical helicopter crash that happened
last night with three people injured.
Whether or not this is normal, it is
being shown to us on the news more
than usual,
which is creating an emotional reaction.
And the false narrative being pushed is that
it's due to DEI,
diversity, equity, and inclusion hires.
But there is zero evidence of this. It's
simply another narrative to keep the sleepy masses
busy while the solution
of replacing humans
with artificial intelligence
is being implemented.
We're already working with,
an a an AI agent company. So they're
building AI agents for this aviation data. So
what you saw in America recently with the
helicopter
crash could have been easily preventable because, ultimately,
the data was there. We can look back
at that that, crash, and we can see
those aircraft heading towards each other and crashing.
So it wasn't the fact that the data
wasn't there. It was just no one nobody
was looking at it at the time, or,
certainly, the people that were looking at it
weren't able to do anything about it. So,
really, what we need to be able to
do is, you know, why have a human
looking at it all the time?
Obviously, you need a human there to monitor
these systems. But if you can use agents
to actually detect these issues and then to
report them and alert them to the air
traffic controllers,
then everyone can be alerted to this problem
or the situation coming up and do so
actually do something about it.
Greg Rees reporting.
And, of course, the same point.
As Israel Town is now is testing air
traffic control for drones.
World Economic Forum. Interesting intersection.
And here's how to use technology to make
air travel more more efficient or even on
the ground. Here's China using AI to tackle
air traffic jams. All World Economic Forum. Hard
to miss the overlap. Great video as always
from Greg Reese. Now here's the interesting points
to think about there, right, with what he's
highlighting.
First, to point out, let's notice that the
the
he makes a good point. Whether it's new,
which I wouldn't say it's new. It's hard
to tell with what they choose to hype
in the even corporate media versus the mainstream
alternative media, which is new representation of the
same problem.
You know, whether they decide to focus on
it more, all of a sudden. Look at
all the mist and the drones, and it's
like everyone just highlighting things that were already
there in some cases. The point though is
that
are they highlighting that because it's getting worse?
And ultimately, are what they highlight first is
that they're at least what they're showing you
began the the the hype, let's say, existed
through Biden into Trump's administration.
That's the that always important point to show
you that it's a it's a nonpartisan
it's a government agenda. Right? But the other
thing was
the two ways you could look at it.
Is that are are they crashing because they're
testing this? That's a good question. But more
so what he's getting at is the rationalization
of why it needs to happen. Now, you
can even go as far as to argue
that these crashes are being made to happen
so that happens. I'm not saying that's what
I think. Certainly possible.
What he's really highlighting, though, is that they're
just simply like, the easiest way to look
at it is that they're just choosing to
overfocus on these events that have always been
there to justify another example of AI control.
I I just it's the it's the main
point for today, and I don't know why
I I mean, I I don't know how
why this would be hard to see. Right?
I mean, the evidence seems to be pretty
clear. Now this is where it gets even
more interesting.
Well, the the overlapping point with this is
just one more example before we get to
the article is that now on Twitter,
he's rolling out the AI chatbot
on Twitter.
So we're beginning not just that we can
use Grok, but but literally as a chatbot
engaged aspect on the actual discussion.
So, I mean, we are being formed right
now. We are being formed on the platform,
but in very broad ways. Very in, I
guess, you could say in unverifiable
ways. Right? Because I can come on and
say, my name's Ryan, and I'm nine feet
tall, and I've got, you know, purple eyes.
The point is the AI would absorb that
information and wouldn't really necessarily know whether it's
true or false other than comparing it to
other things. So there's a reason I make
that point. Because what we're gonna get into
here is about what this is a good
article from the conversation. Doge threat. How government
data could would give an AI company extraordinary
power.
Is that the data that they're getting from
the government databases,
which have regulation,
which have verification,
is
beyond gold. I mean, like, it and this
is actually why I included this today. Again,
showing you that James Corbett has been so
far ahead of information. It's it to the
point to where people don't even know that
he was on the story. Because it was
that that's there's there is very clearly a
detriment to being that far ahead on a
story.
Data is the new oil, 02/2017.
Here we it's where we are, guys. The
the the your data is the most valuable
thing on the planet.
I don't even think that's I I mean,
that's I would argue that there's some nuance
to that, but I don't even think that's
that contentious.
I mean, you really break down the value
that almost becomes immeasurable in some conversations
compared to some kind of very valuable resource.
Ask people in power what they would rather
have.
Everything on everybody or more money. And most
of them recognize, especially today in the field,
the world that we're in, that information really,
you go back as far as you wanna
look. Information has always been the most invaluable
thing
because it's used to control you,
manipulate
you. But now think about everything we've talked
about today and think about the amount of
power
that either Elon Musk
is gaining
or
Trump through that is gaining, or rather I
would see it that our government is gaining
over you and taking things away from you
in the process, or more alarmingly so,
what other entities might be pulling the strings
on all this. Now the bigger picture of
the of the title to the conversation,
whether it is Israel or China or just
The United States, the real question is whether
or not being whether Musk or whoever's pulling
his strings and Peter Thiel
is when this comes out. This has been
an ongoing conversation. If it does and if
it's ever real,
the point is that
it's influenceable,
especially the early aspects of this, where it's
about the data that gets put into it.
So it matters.
If we're talking about and we I think
we've already demonstrated today that it's already happening.
Government through AI,
who is pulling those strings? Where's the data
source coming from? If we're still screening about
Iran nuclear weapons and and yelling about ISIS
attack I mean, guys, we're being lied to
in ways that are so embarrassingly clear to
show or lies about basically everything Israel says.
If that information's being presented to it like
we've already seen, it comes out in a
broken way or a manipulative way.
And I think they've been working on gaining
controlling a system that is
workable
while presenting information that's not true.
I mean, what else can we talk about?
They don't want something that is absolute that's
why the blockchain aspect is only workable for
them if it's something they can manipulate. They
don't want transparency.
Why in the world would you think people
who are dishonest about everything they do, who
are hiding everything they can, who are removing
all ethics pledges and hiding and remove I
mean, it's just everything you could possibly highlight.
Why would they want you to see everything?
The only reason is because you believe you've
told yourself that they're the hero.
That certainly could be wrong, but everything I
just highlighted shows you that they're not doing
what you would argue what a honest person
would do. So whoever it is,
listen to this information and you tell me
this is not concerning.
This is the depart the department of the
Doge has secured unprecedented access to at least
seven
sensitive federal databases,
including those of the IRS
and the Social Security Administration.
This access has sparked fears about cybersecurity vulnerabilities,
especially since they're using private servers and privacy
violations.
Another concern has received far less attention. The
potential use of that data
to train private companies' artificial intelligence systems,
which I'm of the mind is already happening.
And I think we've already seen plenty of
evidence to show that. Katharine Austin Fitts has
discussed the same point. The White House press
secretary said government data that Doge has collected
isn't being used to train Musk's AI models,
despite Elon Musk's control over Doge. However, evidence
has emerged that Doge personnel
simultaneously
hold positions with at least one of his
companies. We already told you we already showed
you the Tesla guy.
Yeah. I don't this is different. This one's
about SpaceX.
But the point overall
is that you could simply argue that he's
not training his models.
Right? Maybe they're working with OpenAI.
There's a reason these things are overlapped. I
think it's all building in the same direction.
I still ask why you think Trump would
lean in with Sam Altman when Musk is
literally building x AI and calls open AI
the end of humanity.
And you take there's no logic there
other than it's all building in one clear
direction and they're using each as a counterbalance
to the other.
And so that means that he's going, yeah,
I'm not gonna use to train my AI
models even though I wouldn't even he'd probably
do it and wouldn't care anyway.
It's as simple as using it on the
other version.
But
many people he overlaps with, and maybe they
are, is the point. At the FFA,
excuse me, I I didn't see people call
me up. I that's just a a mistake
of the mind. I know it's the Federal
Aviation Administration, FAA.
SpaceX employees
at the FAA, SpaceX employees have government email
addresses.
This dual employment creates a conduit for federal
data
to potentially be siphoned to Musk's owned enterprises.
Musk owned enterprises,
including XAI.
Now this is a hypothetical. Right? But realize,
again,
I think we're all very aware of the
kind of people that circle these and it's
not unique to Wright. The kind of ideological
driven people that circle the Bidens and the
Clintons and the same kind of ideological people
that circle the Trumps and the Elon Musk
circle. We all know that if we're honest
with ourselves.
So these are people who are acting through
the the the unprecedented amount of power they're
being given, or at least in some cases.
My point is, do you not think these
people would decide to give out information to
Musk because he's saving the country?
Right? Or he's gonna fight for free speech.
So we're giving the information about these bad
Democrats. We have got in what world does
that not very likely? I'm not saying we
can prove it's happening. And you know, just
as likely with the Clintons and so on.
The point is the same.
You know that's a problem.
And you know they would rationalize it to
anything they want because they've made the argument
that they're saving the world.
It's I mean, isn't it here's what's funny
about this.
They're using this is just gave me. They're
using the argument that we're saving the world
from Democrats or communism or whatever else. And
what's the solution? You're reimagining technocratic future, but
they're not calling it that. What do the
Democrats do?
Well, we're saving the world from climate change.
And what's our solution? Your technocratic future. And
they did call it that. Just a little
different.
Isn't that funny? How it's just a it's
the same solution for the same kind of
problem with a little different flavor, and everybody
ignores the problem. It's again, actually, I I
gotta stop doing that so broadly. I still
and you guys know I say it often,
but I some people miss it. I don't
think it's the majority. When I speak about
that, I'm talking about the partisanship.
I think a lot of people are very
uncomfortable with this, and I think more than
we've ever seen. I think that's why it's
being rushed.
But think about that. Both sides of the
paradigm driving in the same solution
for a different version of the same problem.
This is and then it goes on to
say,
the company's latest Grok.ai
chatbot model
conspicuously
refuses to give a clear denial about using
such data.
That is interesting. I haven't got to test
that yet, but make sure you do. Let
me know what you see about whether Grok
is being used. And by the way, I've
seen people posting things I can't verify, so
I don't wanna share it. But arguing that
Grok is, you know, what ask it whether
it's being trained on government data.
But it says, as a political scientist and
technologist who is intimately acquainted with public sources
of government data, the author writes, I believe
this potential transmission of government data to private
companies
presents far greater privacy and power implications than
most reporting identifies.
A private entity with the capacity to develop
artificial intelligence technologies
could use government data
to leapfrog
its its competitors and wield massive influence over
society.
Now see, here's the problem. This is why
this is not even debatable. Realize
that Donald Trump rolled out through a government
executive order
that we that this was the few the
the direct we are gonna spearhead the AI
discussion for the world.
Okay. Well, there's two very clear leading examples,
xAI and OpenAI. Now you see why he
went with Sam Altman so it wasn't so
shockingly clear that it's just through Elon Musk.
That's why, guys. It's one of the reasons
that I very clearly saw.
Because it's because I think they're all interconnected,
but the point is if you go with
Elon Musk, there'd be a whole other argument
about why he's rolling out, like, through an
advisor, through his program, and there'd be an
issue. Right?
It's as easy as just sidestepping that by
one person.
But you have to realize,
as political it's basically going back as as
political scientists, technologists who was intimately acquainted with
public I believe or was it? A private
equity's capacity to develop art
yeah. So leapfrog competitors is the point that
I was trying to remember. Is the idea
that ultimately you can see that they're you're
talking about leapfrogging,
but, you know, I guess, an AI OpenAI
or whatever else is on the field or
China, for example. My point is that's what
Trump has said his interests are. We are
we need to beat China. That's even what
they use the state of emergency they claim
was gonna be for the border. They they
lied, and it may eventually be, but they
in first used it to roll this out
in an unprecedented fashion.
It's about
the program they're rolling out for the direction,
and the obvious point is that they will
leapfrog the rest of the world if they're
able to use all of this data to
get there. But who's to say that China's
not already doing that? Right?
But that's the game. We gotta do the
same thing or we're gonna lose. Well, the
same thing is violating your privacy rights, ignoring
your free speech. That's where we are.
Then it says, for AI developers, government databases
represent something akin to finding the holy grail.
While companies such as OpenAI, Google, and XAI
currently rely on information scraped from public Internet,
which is crazy in its own right. Like,
they're telling you they're using Twitter to scrape
your what you're claiming to train its models.
That's why you're the product right now.
Non public government respo repositories,
like they're currently accessing,
offer something much more valuable,
verified records of actual human behavior across entire
populations.
This is like the fine tuning that this
needs
to work. That's what it sounds like to
me.
This isn't merely more data. It's fundamentally different
data. Social media posts and web browsing histories
show curated or intended behaviors, but government databases
capture real decisions,
sort of like what you actually did when
you lied about something online. Right? These are
really important distinctions and and learning aspects for
how this is being trained.
And I'm not saying that in a good
way.
And it says and captures the real decisions
and their consequences.
For example,
Medicare records reveal health care choices and outcomes.
Right? Not just what you decided, but what,
you know, what the outcome. IRS and treasury
data reveal financial decisions and then the long
term impacts.
And federal employee employment and education statistics reveal
education paths
and career trajectories.
What makes this data particularly
valuable for AI training is its longitudinal
longitudinal
nature and reliability.
Unlike the disordered information available online,
government records follow standardized protocols,
undergo regular audits, and must meet legal requirements
for accuracy. That's not to say that they're
always accurate. The point though is that you
can very clearly rely more on the you
know, again, I could say something online. It
would be one thing. This is whether I
meant say something or not, you could prove
the long term outcome and not even just
about one person, but a society,
a community,
a certain ideological
conversation.
This is every
oh, that that goes on to say,
unlike the disorder available information online, government records
follow standardized protocols, regular audits, accuracy,
every Social Security payment, Medicare claim, and federal
grant creates a verified data point about real
world behavior. This data exists
nowhere else
with such breadth and authenticity in The United
States. So this is the holy grail of
information, guys. Like, just realize that. You have
to recognize to them as you claim that
you know they know this represents the best
possible database they could find.
Most critically, government databases track entire populations over
time, not just digitally active users. I'll also
add to a foreign government that's trying to
infiltrate all of this. This is mouthwatering.
Now it it says most critically, government databases
track entire populations over time, not just digital
active users. They include people who never use
social media. That's really important
for what they're trying to accomplish to control
their lives. Don't shop online or actively avoid
digital services in general. For an AI company,
this would mean training systems on not on
on the
actual diversity of human experience rather than just
the digital reflections people cast online, which that's
one of the things Grok was having a
problem with.
Then it goes on to say,
control of critical systems. This is what really
worries me. Like, a company like XAI
could do far more with models trained on
government data than building better chatbots on content
generators.
Such systems could fundamentally
transform and potentially control
how people understand and manage complex societal systems.
While some of these capabilities could be beneficial
under the control of countable public agencies,
a believe
I believe the writer
the author writes, they pose a threat in
the hands of a single private company.
I argue it's a threat for both,
But far more obviously and less accountable for
somebody acting through, you know, a private company
that you can't FOIA, even though that doesn't
always give you the information.
But overall,
you can see that this is
not just transform and potentially control systems,
but your worldview. Right? Like, control the way
that we I mean, this is clearly being
used to not to, like, socially engineer
through these systems, but the AI being sort
of the guiding force. But that's what's all
being fleshed out right now, I believe.
Now it says under infrastructure and urban systems,
government databases contain information about critical infrastructure,
usage patterns, maintenance histories, emergency response times, and
development impacts. Think carbine.
Right? Dams, water infrastructure. What Whitney's telling you,
the Israeli government have infiltrated.
Now,
this is the, like, this is like the
chair this is the final point, I argue.
If that's what's happening, and I believe that
it is. We're talking about government databases with
critical information.
Right? That that rub can be pulled, should
there be a problem, or you wanna execute
some kind of an agenda. And this is
what our government's done all over the world.
So this should not be hard to you
for for you to understand.
USAID and National Dawn for Democracy and Israel
and the US government just blatantly have carried
out exactly these kind of actions.
Cyberattacks on Iran, destabilization action, I mean, to
Syria and Lebanon. I mean, all over the
place.
My point is, I think it's already been
done to us, but it's being built out
right now in ways that we will not
be able to come back from.
And the people that I think you're screaming
about saving us from the deep state are
the ones cementing this in place.
Hope I'm wrong.
Every federal grant infrastructure inspection
and emergency response creates a data point that
could help train AI better to understand how
cities and regions function
and through that, better control them. A private
company with exclusive access would gain unique insight
into the physical and economic arteries of American
society.
This could allow the company to develop smart
city systems
that city governments would become dependent on,
efficiently prioritizing aspects of urban governance. Now there's
two points there.
Smart cities are not supposed to be what
are coming through the Trump administration even though
we know that's part of the same discussion.
They're rolling out the great reset, guys. You
can look at all different points. They're just
calling it different things.
Or call them freedom cities if you want.
It's the same conversation.
But the second part
is using that system that these government cities,
the the state level will gobble up because
they want more power that will ultimately make
them dependent on the system for that power.
But it could give you a lot of
different ways. This is just the author theorizing
about this, but it makes it makes a
lot of sense. Privatizing aspects of urban governance.
It says when combined with real time data
from private sources, the predictive capabilities, this is
what's crazy,
predictive capabilities,
would far exceed what any current system can
achieve. Now that is what really comes to
mind for me. Whether Whitney's talking about precrime
or medical precrime,
this amount of data consolidation with what they've
already been doing. I mean, we're talking about
predictive models that go so far beyond what
we've I mean, right now,
how long have I been saying that? The
amount of kind of digital twin research that
they where they can predict what you'll do.
Get I can't even imagine what this will
go to, if not already there.
Where they'll with your information of what you
posted on your 75 different social media platforms
for the last twenty five years, what they
can predict and to a what certainty.
A company such as XAI with Musk resources
and preferential access through Doge could surmount technical
and political obstacles far more easier than competitors.
Now you could mean that in is companies,
or you could mean that in government.
Recent advances in machine learning have also reduced
the burdens of preparing data for the algorithms
to process,
making government data a veritable gold mine,
one that rightfully belongs to the American people.
It's all your data, guys, and they're just
making
talk about like, this is the modern gold
rush, and it has been for a while,
and you're not seeing anything. They're taking all
your data, training everything for themselves, marketing, selling
it. It's like everything else. It's like they've
been doing with our data for since this
started. It's just far more concerning right now.
The threat of a private company accessing government
data transcends individual privacy concerns. It really does.
While still part of it, there's a whole
new level to this. It says, since information
is power,
concentrating unprecedented data in the hands of a
private entity
with an explicit political agenda,
which is obvious. He's not hiding his political
agenda, represents a profound
challenge
to the republic, to the democracy, whatever you
wanna call it, to the country of The
United States,
which, you know, was supposed to be a
republic, but that's not where we are today.
Data is the new oil. Now this is,
by the way, why we and we talked
about this great article from Strategic Culture Foundation.
The d I called it the deep doge
state. Now what they really argue in this
is that this this is a I mean,
ultimately,
represents the deep state. Now whether or not
that's what they
I guess, we could put it as whether
they are
would they have bad intentions, let's say.
You could argue as the Andreessen, you know,
Karp
Machiavellian mindset, whether they're the good elitist saving
you from the bad elitist.
They say elites, but they're elitist.
The tree the the the truth is, guys,
that this is,
it it it's still a consolidation of power,
which is the anybody who cares about these
things and not just the talking points should
care about.
I thought it was in here somewhere.
It's in this it's in this article. It
was strategic culture foundation. Let me see if
I can get it to pop up here.
There it is. I think that's it. It's
a good article. I mean, I go over
pretty extensively in this show, but always, one,
read the article for yourself, but make sure
you support the platform.
It's called Doge, a k a, the Deep
State Made Official. And the old the argument
is
that consider for yourself whether they're just simply
stepping back out of the shadows. That they're
just, like, writing into law that they are
the Deep State exists. I mean, it's whilst
claiming they're fighting it. That's the point they
make about when they're just firing people and
they're like, yay, get rid of deep state.
It's like, did you did you vet? Do
you know those people? Do you know whether
that's what they were doing? Maybe they're firing
people that were fighting the deep state for
all you know. I mean, I I you
don't know these things. You're trusting narratives.
Include that for you.
But here's the point as mentioned earlier. Here's
the Washington Post. It's not about the platform.
It says no. Artificial intelligence can't decide whom
to fire
or many other Doge goals.
It says, identify miss critical missing mission critical
jobs, spot dead people on Social Security roles.
Government needs AI,
but what Doge appears to be doing doesn't
add up. And there is your classic
false binary.
Right?
So is the question whether we need the
right kind of AI? That's the same thing
Trump and or rather Musk and his Altman
were doing. Or is the question whether we
should allow this at all? The government does
not I don't I mean, they unless your
argument is we have to to fight I
mean, the it's this you're literally putting out
imperialist arguments.
We can't let China over what what are
we talking about? Are you of the mind
that China will use that to overtake our
country? It's certainly possible.
But the idea is if we're going to
have that conversation, it can't be this rush
to the end with no concern for privacy
outcomes. Our government is not made for that
right now. Our government is our enemy.
That's very clear to me. And no. I'm
not calling for violence. The reality is that
we need to ask ourselves how we change
this. Get to a place to where we
can have a valid discussion about how we
would decide as an entity to roll these
things out in ways that would, which I'm
of the mind of the snow. My argument
will always be no. But that's not to
say that I'm unaware of the argument for
why logically we might need to for a
threat.
I don't I just know. I'll I'll always
be of the mind. That's not the way
to go.
My point, though, is that if we're gonna
pretend that that threat justifies actions that go
against everything we believe in, then we don't
believe in anything.
This is Washington Post telling you that we
need what they're rolling out. We just don't
need it their way.
Stand back and ask whether we need it
at all.
Now a federal judge has denied a request
to block Doge from accessing treasury data. It
started out where they essentially did, and then
ultimately, the judge stepped in as denied the
request to block them. So they have access
to this data. That was as of today.
I just think this is insane.
Lastly, to go back to the point that
we're making,
funny how on March 6, The Guardian writes
this article,
revealed
Israeli military creating a chat GPT like tool
using vast collection of Palestinian surveillance data.
It's almost too perfect of a point. Like,
this sums up everything we're talking about in
one discussion.
Not that the Guardian it's not even about
the platform. It's about the reality that the
Israeli government is choosing to emulate what your
government's doing to you in exactly the same
way against the Palestinians, but very publicly. We're
just using your AI chat game to surveil
Palestinians.
Guys, if you don't see how obvious that
is, that this is exactly what they're doing
to you
and Israel the same, there's a reason this
is overlapped,
I don't know what else I can do
for you.
All of it's there for you. All the
information, look into
it. At the very least, ask yourself if
it's possible. If Israel's literally using these tools
for that purpose on Palestinians and these tools
are right now on your phones,
ask yourself whether that could be happening. Maybe
it's even Israel too. That would make more
sense than anything.
At least ask the question,
especially while Palantir, who is embedded like a
tick in this administration,
is literally building AI systems for this country
as well as helping the genocide in Israel.
January Twelfth Twenty Twenty Four.
While the genocide's ongoing, there's carp, there's steel,
literally a part of it,
Or both sides of the whether Kamala, Biden,
or Trump, or whoever, the point was it
was always going to be a Zionist hectic
grad. That's how this has worked out.
And in a general sense,
AI governance,
that's World Economic Forum.
This is called the AI governance alliance, and
you'll find that they're all involved.
I also find that most everybody in this
administration has tapped into somewhere with them and
the young global leaders or whatever else, but
it's all a big coincidence
as long as it's your side.
And just to end in general, we will
be talking more about Palestine and Gaza in
general. But look, Vanessa and I already talked
about this. This was a 12/18/2024.
The Gaza Technocracy
Incubator.
There this there's a reason that they're testing
these things there. There's a reason that they're
just talking about getting rid of them to
build the Technate there. There's something happening.
Israel is a central plane in all this,
and you how can you miss that Trump's
administration is bowing to them?
Just like the other side of the conversation,
but right now in a way I've never
seen.
And they're openly telling you that they're gonna
build something new.
It's important to realize that this is all
coming together, and it all it's it's just
willful disregard
as they build it around you.
And at the same time, which we'll talk
about more, actually, I'm gonna keep this open
so I remember to reference that again.
This is from March 4. Egypt's plan, Gaza
plan, excludes Hamas from future governance. Now, I
already talked about this, and the point is
that that's not enough for Israel.
It should be in the context of what
they claim they want, but really what they
want is the killing of all Palestinians.
So Hamas has said this already. What? Fine.
We we won't be in the government, but
they said, oh, we want them gone, which
technically is not their right. None of this
is that nothing they do is legal.
My point is not about which we'll talk
about more in the next show about the
future of what's gonna happen there.
But this to me show is also tied
to today's conversation.
Who who who apparently Palestinians no longer, if
ever, get to decide their own future of
governance. But realize
this is not even on the table since
they're gonna kick them all out and Trump
said they're not allowed to return. What I'm
trying to highlight is another experiment wherever they
go
of AI management,
which is being discussed.
And the people involved are already doing that.
If you haven't been seeing that they've been
spying
the the overlapping of Gaza is the one
of the most surveilled places in the world.
That's using artificial intelligence, Palantir, and the rest.
We already know this. So we are being
trained.
We are be this is a model that
is gonna be rolled out that I see
happening in real time.
Here's Prospera in Honduras, if you need to
remember that. How obvious this there's been pilots
of this all over the place.
This is coming.
Now I'll end with
the interesting idea of
trusting the plan.
You know, it it it's interesting to see
a lot of people who wanna believe that
we just need to give them a shot.
Right? We just need to let them see
how this plays out.
Well, you know what? That's never the right
answer.
You may be right. Maybe it'll turn out
that they're fighting for us. I I I
hope more than anything in the world that
you're right.
The problem
is you could be wrong.
We don't know. Right? And if you're honest,
you'll admit that. We don't it's your you
hope. Well, you could be wrong. So is
it not the smartest thing to do to
just wait for outcome,
to be critical of things that give you
suspicion and then praise it when it happens
if the good thing comes?
You see, that's just objectivity.
That's honesty.
The problem is far too many people have
been propped up who want you to trust
the plan.
That seems to be everyone in this administration,
quite frankly. But, again, it's the government. It's
the same old tactics.
Here is Dan Bongino. And, really, what I'm
actually highlighting here is what Maga Voice said
about what Dan said. What Dan said is
basically, don't worry, Cash. I'll be there on
the seventeenth. Cash Patel and Bondi got it
covered.
Which you could argue doesn't mean that they
just trust everything they say, but you know
that's what he's putting forward, and you can
listen to the larger conversation. That's essentially what
he's saying. My point is MAGA voice
highlights that and says, Dan Bongino reminds everybody
that Cash Patel and Pam Bondi have got
things covered.
He will be at the FBI March seventeenth.
Let's freaking go.
It's so funny.
Point is,
I said, so essentially trust the plan. Right?
They've got it.
Stop criticizing them. They'll get it done. We'll
get the empty files out. Just let it.
So sit back and trust the plan.
It's what they've always been telling you.
Even though it's been year after year after
year after what they promised one and this
isn't this isn't just queue. It's just the
obvious point in all of this.
It's clearly being shown to be a intelligence
operation that's been ongoing for probably Israel for
all I know or some central people being
led by that who are influencing people that
are being led by the nose. And I
think it's far more
it's far less of the conservative movement than
you think. It's specifically team sport politics.
I just don't know why people can't see
this in that inner circle if they're like,
other than just the dishonest people that don't
care. I know some of them that just
can't seem to wrap their mind around it.
I know they're not dishonest. I don't understand
what the block is. I think that's where
we get into the whole psychological play, whether
it's like a cult ice ice ice ice
ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice
ice ice seeing through
this. That's not to say the same as
saying no I don't support Trump for example,
but clearly
see the problem whether Israel influence on the
government whether the AI direction or MRNA or
vaccine and ever you name it.
It's an endless list right now, so you
know people see it.
All I go as always, what I want
is people that are willing to question these
things. Don't take my word for it. Don't
blindly assume they're all the problem. Look into
it. Just show skepticism.
It's okay to stand back and say, well,
we don't know right now. Let's wait for
the outcome.
It's all I want. Because right now, we
need that more than ever. I'm gonna leave
you with a clip from Carrie Wedler.
Outstanding work as always.
Watch the whole thing. I mean, you you
I mean, most of you probably already know
where this is gonna go, where right when
it starts. But just it's important because she
makes excellent points, especially
if you're of the mind that, you know,
ultimately, we should let them see. Like, my
point is not to not let them see.
Like, the point is we have to let
it play out. We don't have a choice,
essentially. But don't,
I guess, shout down people or argue that
we shouldn't be questioning it. We all should
be questioning it. We should say that this
doesn't feel right. But I I still have
hope they're gonna do the right thing. That's
all I'm that's all I think that would
be an acceptable answer, but you can do
what you want. Now you have to do
what I think is acceptable.
But the overarching point is about about integrity,
honesty,
principles.
And so by choosing to ignore things that
you would call out in other people's situations,
you you know you're doing something wrong. You
know that you're doing it. You're pulling a
punch because you want to believe it. And
I I said in the other interview, I
know. I get it. I want to believe
this is gonna be a positive thing. Don't
we all?
But it's just
the the only thing we can do today
is
question everything.
More importantly, the people that we believe in.
So this clip, I think breaks it down
about why trusting the plan has always been
a manipulation.
And hopefully, it'll drive you to see a
bigger picture beyond partisanship, which is where we
all need to get to. Thank you for
tuning in today.
Really appreciate all your support, guys. Couldn't do
this without you. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
I'll feel like they're watching their fellow humans
fall into a trance and throw themselves off
a cliff as they fall under a new
propaganda spell convincing them the oligarchs have come
to the rescue, the government is now the
good guy, and America's Golden age. Golden age.
Golden age.
Golden age. Golden age. Has arrived? The trans
goes like this. Tulsi is the director of
National Intelligence, RFK Jr. Is going to make
us healthy, and Elon and the Doge are
exposing corruption and waste. Cash is now the
top cop. There's a task force to release
classified documents, and Trump froze foreign aid. America
is back, and the new ruling class is
here to liberate and protect us while taking
out the deep state. Finally, we're saved. It's
tempting, and it sounds miraculous.
Until you look past the shadows on the
wall to the character and behaviors of those
casting them. While it's great and not hard
at all or revelatory to expose government waste
and corruption, how is Elon going to handle
his own surveillance state and military industrial contracts?
Will SpaceX face scrutiny for buying bipartisan influence
in the broken system he and the oligarchy
now rail against? How is Doge any match
for the current House Republican budget proposal, which
is slated to increase the deficit by hundreds
of billions each year? The Senate overwhelmingly voted
against an amendment to make significant spending cuts
to their version of the astronomical budget. Is
a public private partnership with some of the
most powerful tech people who are pushing biometric
digital IDs and envisioning total surveillance taking down
the deep state? Is advancing artificial intelligence in
government, especially in the military and the CIA
to the benefit of Silicon Valley Tycoons what
MAGA voted for? Are mRNA AI cancer shots
and poultry injections Maha? Is the new seed
oil shilling deputy director of the USDA? Fun
fact, RFK Jr. Does not oversee the USDA.
Meanwhile, Patel vows to punish journalists when the
government decides they've done bad things. And about
those classified documents the most transparent administration in
history promised you. Trump, quote, banned CBDCs only
to promote them with an extra step. It's
cool Trump said he wants to cut defense
spending. He also recently said If we wanna
raise defense spending, I think we have to
have it. The new Senate Republican budget proposal
allows for a hundred and 50,000,000,000 more for
the military in the next nine years. Meanwhile,
Trump is funneling literal tons of weapons to
Israel. He claims The US will annex Gaza
and his entire cabinet is packed with Israel
boot looking shills while he orders a multi
billion dollar iron dome built over America. By
the way, Biden launching air strikes against terrorists
is unconstitutional,
but Trump doing it is extraordinary leadership. A
government agency is looking to monitor speech for
criticism of said government agency. Trump is attempting
to silence speech for his handlers and just
shut down a police accountability database. He is
also expanding Guantanamo, a black stain on American
values. His King Neocon endorsed CIA director won't
reject the use of torture. But Trump's Wall
Street secretary of commerce did say his goal
is to abolish the IRS, and paying higher
prices caused by government intervention is now patriotic.
So bend the knee. I get that people
wanna feel optimistic. The ruling class has beaten
them down, made them feel othered, dehumanized, and
disempowered. People of all partisan persuasions have been
conditioned to believe they can't save themselves, that
they need politicians and oligarchs to liberate them.
And because of the Me, the people, are
the government. Indoctrination pushed in civics, they believe
these politicians and oligarchs
and
the authoritarian state they rule over are actually
extensions of themselves. This is a recipe for
the most extreme dystopia yet. The propaganda is
top tier, and the masses are now being
showered with signs of hope and change just
enough that many of them will look the
other way at the rapid progression of the
technocratic police state and the further consolidation of
power in the hands of a few. These
types call anyone who questions their new narratives
blackpilled. But blackpilled means cynical and negative, and
many of us questioning the new regime are
anything but. We simply don't believe real solutions
come from government and the documented liars and
megalomaniacs
in control of it. Or that a few
comes of winning will counteract the grave threats
to liberty imposed by those at the top,
as they always have been. And don't even
think about calling me a Libtard. I'm more
anti government than any Magabot. And my skepticism
doesn't change based on who's in power. If
you're watching this rapid descent into cultism and
feeling disturbed and disheartened, please know you're not
alone. Many of us out here aren't falling
for the new regime's propaganda and will continue
to question and resist government authority regardless of
who's in control of it. Those of us
who understand that government and the people who
seek control of it aren't coming to save
us will keep pushing back against the smoke
and mirrors. MAGA may be celebrating their new
masters in chains, but some of us don't
want masters in chains for ourselves or anyone
else.