FDA has actually licensed
three
different vaccines
for humans for bird flu. They are in
the strategic
national stockpile.
One of them has a brand name, Audens.
It was approved in 2020.
It has a novel adjuvant, MF59.
This adjuvant has not been approved for most
other vaccines. The only reason it's approved here
because this is supposedly
only going to be used in some dire
emergency.
It turns out that in a clinical trial,
fatal
serious adverse events included eleven
people who got this vaccine,
but only one person who got the placebo.
One in two hundred people who got this
vaccine in a clinical trial died.
This is an example of how one bad
decision
snowballs to another. Somebody was worried about bird
flu.
Okay. Here's some here's some contracts from the
federal government. Go make a bird flu vaccine.
You've got a dangerous vaccine for a nothing
disease.
And here's Peter Marks, the head of vaccines
at FDA, who says we're ready to pull
the trigger. You get one person that they
claim dies of bird flu and he's gonna
be rolling those vaccines out.
So be very, very careful. Don't be scared.
This is a scam. The whole purpose of
bird flu is to make you think
the pandemics are out there. They're coming for
you all the time and you
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last twenty four hours.
Mondays.
StreamYard's killing me. Monday excuse me. Monday, 02/17/2025.
Thank you for being here today. Following up
from yesterday.
Glad we got to it today. I have
a lot to follow-up on specifically around foreign
policy, but as I figured, as day by
day, it just continues to get more more
chaotic.
There's things that I wanted to make sure
we included
out of the gate that you saw following
up from major things we covered yesterday or
just the the the some of the focal
points, not necessarily major in the the larger
context of the what's going on in the
world, but some important things to discuss and
some interesting follow ups. One of which, the
the main point of yesterday,
got a lot of pushback as you might
expect. And we'll go over why I think
that is and how interesting it is to
see how people just unwilling to acknowledge something
or refusing to look at it because that's
that I don't trust that platform even though
the source material can very clearly be tied
right back to the administration themselves.
It's interesting to see this bird flu development,
how it overlaps with RFK Junior.
And just since yesterday, there's been another development.
Now he's there there there was somebody from
Trump's administration speaking to Fox News who stated
exactly what I quoted in the title today,
medications and biosecurity.
Now as always, I'm not claiming I I'm
it's
just what he said. Based on what just
happened, conditionally approving a poultry poultry boot
bird flu vaccine
as well as the funding for an mRNA
bird flu vaccine for Moderna that took place
three days before Donald Trump came into power,
but right now they have the power to
revoke that and no one has.
All these together. There's no there there was
all those things are verifiably facts.
What can kills me is how many people
seem to not want to engage with that
honestly and just either dismiss it entirely because
it ruins the whole kind of shtick that's
happening right now
or try
to cast blame onto something else. Now all
we're doing here is acknowledging it happened under
this administration.
Could it possibly be some other person surreptitiously?
Of course, it could. That's always possible. It's
always there. And what's important for you is
to decide really if that even matters. If
we're still always stuck in this game of
pretending, you know, it it matters more if
it's one person versus the other, how about
it just matters if your government is doing
any of this at any time, regardless of
what left and right part is taking the
the, you know, the the stage at the
moment.
So we're gonna start with that as well
as an another follow-up on the Reuters point.
Again, something that is, you know, it's it's
it's very relevant. It has it matters. It's
one part of a much larger story. But
even within that, it's, you know, even comparatively
to the foreign policy foreign policy points, it
seems largely irrelevant, but not not important in
the sense of US spending and so on.
But my point is
from the idea of, let's just say, the
political story, right, where we found out that
there was funding coming through these channels that
went to media. Now, of course, it got
couched as left media even though even Ron
Paul pointed out it was mainstream
media all the way around. And we know
this if we've been paying attention about USAID
and what these things actually do. I pointed
out through USA spending that Donald Trump was
doing the same thing even to those news
organizations
in his last administration. And even now going
forward, there are examples of the same thing.
So right now, I just I'll show you
to start. Donald Trump is funding or rather
to be accurate and objective. His administration
is funding
Reuters Newswire services.
Right just after this big, very misrepresented
story, which I'll briefly touch on again, around
Reuters Thomas
services. And that got used and still and
even to the point where Donald Trump, after
all of the information fleshed out, shared the
most dishonest part of it, which was the
rep the misrepresentation of only left media, which
it wasn't even Reuters. We'll go through it.
My point is, let's just even say that
story was completely accurate, which it wasn't.
Shouldn't then it'll make shouldn't it be just
as concerning now that we can see the
current dynamic?
His current administration funding Reuters Newswire services, whether
it's because Reuters is a bad, bad, you
know, lefty no no no go zone or
because you're funding Newswire services, which you could
argue is just funding Reuters, which he just
told you was a left leaning platform.
How does that all make sense?
Well, the only really honest way that it
will ever make sense is if you stand
back and recognize that it's all a game.
The left right paradigm is designed to keep
you from fully seeing the bigger picture. That
does not mean that there are not people
that genuinely act within that, especially on the
lower rungs of it all, even within the
power structure, or that they just buy into
it entirely.
The point is where the direction goes, the
real string pullers of the world, which, hopefully,
all of us are beginning to really start
to stand back and look at, and that's
why this gets so uncomfortable.
But it's incredible to see how this keeps
going, and there's
amazing
from someone like Elon Musk playing the central
role in all of this and just using
the most gaslighting,
deceptive, just blatantly dishonest tactics all over all
day long because he's surrounded by a bunch
of sycophants that will shout you down or
anybody else who have been allowed to gain
all this clout and funding and money and
just everything. They've literally dumped resources. And I
mean, like,
lots of money, lots of clout in people
that do not deserve it, that are very
immature, and it's pretty alarming. But that's the
world powerful
that's how the world works, I guess. Just
thinking about an age I have in history,
a powerful person can do things like that.
The point is not to go, that's not
allowed, it's people can do what they want.
It's that we need to acknowledge how this
is working and make sure we're all honest
with ourselves about what that really means when
he just basically starts accusing people of hiding
something when they start to call him out
for something. That doesn't mean you have to
take the other guy's side of the argument.
Just recognize that you should be considering all
sides of this and not just start going,
you must be hiding something if you're calling
out what everybody honest can see is very
dishonest
about what they're doing, around lying about stories
from the Doge discussion or we'll get into
all of that as well.
It's
changing quite a lot in ways that I
don't think Americans are fully grasping, a lot
of us.
But I'm also gonna get into the part
where this overlaps with Israel, which overlaps with
what's going on in Gaza. And I wanna
focus most of the time today on that
conversation as well as the overlap with Iran,
with Marco Rubio.
And, of course, that swings right back around
with the current Trump administration. You can see
how all of this is playing out, and
a lot of that's not getting any attention.
All of that, again, USAID,
still there. Rubio, the same conversation, the same
funding, the same regime change engine, and it
is still working. It is still functioning, and
I've been proving that pretty much every day,
and I'll show you more examples again today.
Just matters if you care. Do you care
about the honest facts here? Do you care
about the idea that this is all of
your government doing the same things? And, yes,
we should care about all of it, Not
just when Biden does it, not just when
Trump does it, but when anybody in the
government does it, which is the only honest
stance to take in any of this.
So we're gonna start
oh, and by the way, I believe we
just started with
which one was it?
Making sure I'm not forgetting which clip. I
had a couple I was gonna start with.
Let's see. Oh, that's right. The, so the
the Corbett clip with Nas. And the the
point there is not to forget that that's
an older clip. Right? So she's talking about
the last major focus on this, but it
was 2020 that the last one was allowed.
That's Trump's administration.
Just continuity. It was all that is. Biden
did the same things.
It's all the same. Hope we can see
that. So let's get into to start today
something one of the point that I'm gonna
go back to in a second. But just
for those that only tune into the beginning,
I just wanted you to see this. So
I really do think this is a pretty
ridiculous and and the one before, even more
so. So if you don't remember, this was
only the thirteenth. We broke down the reality
that people like e, Miles Chong, and Elon
Musk, and Donald Trump, and all of them
in in in in collusion, apparently,
built this fake narrative around something that was
not true.
It's all right here for you to watch,
including the link that has all the source
material. The bottom line is that they're trying
to make it sound like this was Reuters'
new agent agency when it was not. Most
people are assuming it's it's USAID even though
it was not.
And it started in 02/2018,
predominantly funded, which was Reuters
Thomas Reuters Special Services, which is a DOD
contractor, which well beneath that is Reuters, but
it's part it's under the umbrella, not the
same thing. And I made the point in
the video, yes, that could still fund over
to Reuters, which we should care about. But
the facts matter, which is that most of
that funding happened during Trump's administration and then
ended in 2022.
Oh, and, of course, it's
what was it?
Trying to find the name.
Active social engineering and large scale deception is
what it was. And And the point I
make in this is, can we not stand
back and ask if we're building this narrative
about large scale deception from 2018 right up
to 2020?
And very minimal from there continues in the
bible I mean, that that to me is
the building of the COVID nineteen illusion, but
that's just me. But the point is we
then continue or the narrative continues.
So to be clear, we're talking about a
funding of a group that has been contracted
to the DOD well before this. So this
is not secret. This is not leaked. They
all lied about that, and they continue to
lie that it's just Reuters. Donald Trump even
shared a tweet saying the left leaning Reuters
got $9,000,000.
Give the money back. You gave it to
him, Trump. You gave them the vast majority
of that money. They all either know this
and are just playing you like the gods
of condoms story, or they're that uninformed and
just
lurching at anything they can get to make
you upset about things that might not even
be true. It's insane that it's happening, and
that is the word that keeps swirling around
my mind. It's it's like schizophrenic almost.
But so watch the clip if you want
to understand the facts. Actually, the truth
of this was not Reuters news agency, but
still obviously matters, and it should equally matter
that it was funded all through Trump's administration.
And here again is Musk doing the same
thing that came from Mario doing the same
thing. I mean, all of these things extended
from the same story. Anybody paying attention already
knew that this was not what it appeared
to be. So my point is,
make sure you watch that because there's so
many other points in there that make this
very clear, is to this point. So I
was continuing on this just, you know, for
sake of research to find out if there
is any more that pops up.
And I said, so for all those who
still, by the way, a lot of them,
including Trump, that two days later continue to
lie about that story by he like, he
did with Gaza condoms, doubled down on it,
still misrepresenting the story for those that are
still doing that, the one I quoted below
that I just showed you, or who rightly
care about the political funding story? Because that
should matter regardless of what side you're on.
Does it matter to you that the current
Trump administration is paying Reuters news?
Actually, Reuters news. Not Thomas services, but Reuters
news for, quote, wire services for news stories.
Right? If you're consistent in your logic, then
it should. That's not to say that it
matters that it that it actually means what
anybody may think it means. My point is
if in your logic, that was a problem
before, it should be it should be a
problem now.
My point would be that all this shows
you and, actually, I'll go to the link
here
because I always include that for you.
And I'm I'm, you know, I'm going further
than I wanted to to start. I mean,
I just wanted to point this out, and
then I'm gonna go do it more later,
but I guess we're gonna talk about it.
Is that ultimately the point
is that it is Reuters news and media.
K? And it is US, and this is
from the US government, and it's currently his
administration.
And I can show you that the funding
itself has continued
since February 13. They added another $733,000
funding action to Reuters news. That's Donald Trump's
administration
well into it. There's no way you can
try to split hairs about this unless you
wanna pretend it was some other person who
did this without them knowing it. I guess
that's always possible, but that is a very
easy self serving claim to listen to. Consider
it. Sure. But I wanna what I showed
you, if you've been following along, is this
is not unique. He's been doing it since
last administration. There's multiple examples of this already,
whether Reuters or other dues services,
which, by the way, he just said, Reuters
is a left leaning platform. Okay.
So if we can see this, it's right
here,
starting in 2022, going all the way to
2027. So, yes, Biden's administration too. That's the
point. It's not unique to one side or
the other.
And it says right here, why are services
for news stories?
K? That is obvious.
So maybe that doesn't matter to you. Maybe
it shouldn't. Reuters is one of these high
AP Reuters. I mean, I think they're all
propagandists in some level,
but we've always known this. We know the
government pays for these cons like, these service
feeds. Right?
That shouldn't mean that doesn't mean they might
not also do that to fund them to
get them to do what they want. That's
what they all do. My point is this
is not new information.
Like, USAID is not new information. The only
new aspect of it is them trying to
couch you on one side of the paradigm
to manipulate you.
That's the Ian Myles Strong aspect of this.
Acting like every new thing Elon points to
without even just putting three different words on
Twitter becomes some new breaking story. They're literally
being led by the memes, and I'll get
to that in a second. This meme came
out about the PayPal dynamic, and somebody else
made that joke into a meme, which doesn't
even actually make sense. Now he's using that
argument against people online.
Like, they just it's just this we live
in this clown world right now that is
absolutely insane.
But I guarantee you this will get very
little engagement, very little reach, because it only
matters to point out against it's about winning
politically.
Right? That's not winning because we're beating the
deep state. It's winning because our side can
shout and dunk on Democrats for thirty seconds
and act like we're the adults in the
room when I'm embarrassed for you.
We'll come back to that again, I guess,
to show you to overlap it with the
point we'll get to. Here's the actual story
where we covered that along with a lot
of other important things right now that are
suddenly breaking news to everybody else.
I I wanna also start with this point
that I thought was interesting. Now I'm not
saying that what Aaron says here is verifiable.
What I'm saying is just understand what this
means in the context of what he's suggesting.
And I do or I've made this argument
before based on a few different factors. This
is about he says BlackRock now owns a
majority of Bitcoin miners. By the way, very
different than just owning the majority of Bitcoin.
Right? Miners is the CPU power used to
actually mine the blocks. And if you don't
understand that, I won't go any further. There's
links I'll include for our interviews about this.
The bottom line is that when you own
51%
or more of the CPU power according to
Satoshi's original white paper, that gives you the
ability to create what's called a 51% attack.
Now I'll just read what I said. Now
I'm just high highlighting here is what that
means. Right? So I just want you to
understand this in the context. Again, what I
was gonna say though is my point is,
I believe that's already happened a long time
ago.
That whether BlackRock or the US government or
just simply two major entities that already exist
publicly, they're the two largest miners,
together own more than 51%. I mean, how
easy would it be for them to go,
hey. Let's let's just work together, and we
can do whatever we want.
But some peep most lots
people have morals and integrity. Sometimes that guide
their thought. I'd like to believe that's the
majority.
My point though is that I think this
has already happened. I simply said, here is
the 51% attack. The link to the actual
study, you can read about it. Meaning, they
can literally create side chains. So if you
don't know what that means, think of Bitcoin
versus Bitcoin cash or BSV, which I argue
is the original continuation
of the original Bitcoin vision. And that's actually,
if you read the white paper, the actual
point, and that's why they call it Satoshi
Vision, BSV.
Bitcoin Satoshi Vision. But people disagree on that,
and we that's of course, we have the
right to. But if you actually understand how
this works and look at the technology and
look at how it all went down, I
think we already saw this happen. I think
they deviated the chain,
which became the new one, and then just
pretended like that was the continuation of the
original chain and and called the other one
something different. They the one they were the
ones that broke off. And so I think
that happened a long time ago. And what
that means is they can then create, with
that 51% or more of a TPU power,
side chains like that without you knowing this,
right, which would allow double spending, then you
use Bitcoin more than once or plenty of
other way crazier things,
but then also divert the community unknowingly
to that new dishonest chain. So they would
be able to get away with stealing and
a lot of other
invasive things as we get into the whole
AI overlap and where this all goes.
So think about that. As we're considering the
US government and and BlackRock and the rest
of them, they're the ones building this. Doesn't
that worry everybody? Just because you've been convinced
that somehow this current
dystopian oligarchic hecticratic leadership is somehow on your
side fighting the deep state doesn't mean that
it doesn't
they still have that ability. So they're gonna
and like we're seeing with all the rest
of what they're doing, as long as they
save the country, the law doesn't seem to
matter anymore. So I personally think the means
matter more than anything.
But as I believe this happened a long
time ago, this is why it's being used
by the current US government.
But if case even that didn't make sense
to you, the simple thing to understand is
if you have that much ability,
this more than 51% CPU power, which again,
this might include the screenshot right from
it it quotes Satoshi's white paper. The system
is secure as long as honest nodes collectively
control more CPU power than any cooperating
group of attacking nodes.
Attacking only mean that they're then using that
power dishonestly.
So or other things.
The idea meaning that if they have that
power, they can effectively manipulate what we see
and convince the world, including all the other
miners, that the thing they go forward on
is the is the real one, and that's
what
create basically legitimize their crimes. And nobody would
even be able to tell the difference.
This is this incredible stuff. Just realize, that
may not matter to a lot of people
listening, but this is where they're going with
this no matter what. With the digital currency,
Trump's administration,
mark my words, whatever they wanna call it,
the stablecoin, Tether dynamic, it's all the same
overlap. And that's way worse than a CBDC,
by the way, and this is what I'm
worried about.
Is it funny that, you know, BlackRock is
funding XAI and Elon Musk and, you know,
we just
it's just it's the same old thing. It's
incredible what people can ignore when it's on
their side of the paradigm. When it's anybody
else, it would be, oh my god. This
should end the world. And then I included
the study right there for you. Now I'll
include Mitch's interview, Mitch Burcham,
how the government come commandeered Bitcoin, we talk
about that, and its decentralized future, arguing the
same kind of idea that it's broken. And
at the same time, we could still use
it from other not Bitcoin main, but ultimately
other ones or even within, like, the same
technology to essentially fight back. And you can
disagree with that. I I welcome that. But
considerate is all I'm asking. We also followed
up with Mark Goodwin with a slightly different
discussion, but interestingly
saying overall,
can it be used to fight back point?
He simply asked, what was Bitcoin a government
operation to begin with, which is something they,
I think, disagree on. On. Overall, they both
seem to argue that we should be using
this to fight back. Please question it. Come
to your conclusions about it.
Other than that kind of point, we have
a lot of great discussions in both of
these about a lot of the the details
and what it could be, and
I think we're being used right now in
a lot of clear ways.
Now on that note about, you know, since
I pointed to it,
the idea that BlackRock is indeed funding publicly,
I argue way worse way more ways than
that that we don't see, Elon Musk
through DARPA's x AI that is now totally
not DARPA's x AI even though it's the
exact same program with the exact same name,
sort of like total information awareness became Palantir,
at least they chose changed the name,
$6,000,000,000.
BlackRock and a few others. So directly funding
Elon Musk. I
we used to think that mattered, right, when
we weren't fighting the deep state apparently. Well,
SMX points out that Elon Musk and the
xAI team worked tirelessly until 5AM in the
morning, so they said. I guess, we you
know, just they say a lot of things
these days. Who knows if they're real or
not? Installing supercomputers at the XAI data center
in Memphis.
All in just nineteen days, the fastest anyone's
ever seen. Right? So that's because they're Stargate
and the infra the unfettered money flow for
AI infrastructure, which we all knew was gonna
happen. They're just showing you what their focus
is.
They're giving you a lot of these these
bones of information, of text on on Twitter
about all these things they say are happening,
and very few people seem to care about
proving them when this is what they're actually
doing. That's my opinion.
Rolling out your control structure. And he says,
GROC three is coming on Monday, so I
have a quick few points on that. And
I simply highlighted this article, and I said,
I think we're being played, which is the
article where we discussed the art the DARPA
overlap,
which, again, used to matter to this very
crowd and suddenly doesn't seem to be a
problem anymore. The quiet transition from DARPA's x
AI to Elon's x AI.
I mean, literally, within a matter of months,
DARPA concludes their
explainable AI program.
Right?
And then suddenly, Elon buys Twitter. He turns
it into x.com, and then right away starts
x AI.
And in case you forgot,
DARPA's part of it was literally called explainable
AI, and they use this to basically create
things that you could understand. Okay. Well, if
you look on anything on Twitter right now,
what's all these x a oh, look at
that. Explain this post.
Almost like it's the exact same it's the
same thing, guys. It's just lazy.
They are it's
the the if you think these people are
fighting the deep state, then you have to
conclude that the DARPA, the CIA, the NSA,
the NRO, that none of these are the
deep state.
Have fun working that out because they're literally
working with all these people.
But here he is saying, Grok three is
so based. It just makes me laugh. It's
so stupid. This guy loves to be school
so bad. Some of these people that just
seem to grow up in, like, very, very
like, they probably got picked on their whole
lives or just it's just it's this funny
presentation to me. But he goes, check this
out. It's so based. He says, the information,
which is a platform, I'm actually not that
familiar with, but then that's not the point
about whether this is accurate or not. It's
about the way that this is being presented.
So consider it for yourself either way of
it because rock two seems to disagree. It
says, is like most legacy media, which I
is that would you consider legacy media? Look
at it for yourself. It seems like one
of these kind of side I would argue
it's part of the same apparatus. Like, so
is everything they're doing right now, but
interesting to think about. But he goes, it's
garbage. It's part of the old guard. This
is this is Grok three saying this. Old
guard.
It's just it's like they literally are training
it to just be, like, regurgitate their talking
points. And this is filtered, biased, and often
serving the interest of its founders and editors
rather than giving you the unvarnished truth. I'd
probably agree with that. I honestly, again, I'm
not familiar with the platform, but I if
it I would probably agree. My point would
be that what they just listed off is
everything they're doing too. And it says you
get polished narratives like they're doing, you know,
kind of unpolished clumsy narrative, but nonetheless, not
reality.
X
So Twitter, on the other hand, is where
you find raw, unfiltered news straight from the
people's living it. No. I actually agree with
the way they said that to some degree.
Because what's funny is he loves to frame
it like this is the news. This is
the agency.
That's like calling your TV a news agency.
It's not the point. As peep people can
dump cat videos on Twitter just making news.
But in this context, I do actually. This
is what I say. This is one of
the best locations
that you're gonna get real time despite them
actively censoring certain conversations, despite all the narratives.
You can still find stuff instant, like moment
to moment. Something happened thirty seconds ago. You
can find somebody posting on the ground. As
long as you're willing to consider that at
any moment, any of it, all of it,
half of it could be fake.
For any reason. Just because maybe they just
thought it'd be funny to pick, you know,
it's always consider that. But nonetheless,
straight from people living on the ground. I
think that is important. But he says no
middle man, no spin. Well, that's not true.
Obviously. Of course, there could be a middle
man. Of course, there could be spin. So
that's my point. You really think this AI
can't factor in the idea that somebody could
be lying on Twitter? Think of how stupid
that is. And this is the new version,
and it says just the facts as they
happen. Oh, so we're now assuming that everything
they share from the ground is factual?
Guys, we should laugh at how stupid this
is. I'm willing to bet you this probably
even got typed out by him. But it
says, don't waste your time with the information
or legacy outlet. X is the only place
for real trustworthy news. Again, that's also a
stupid statement. There's a hell of a lot
of independent platforms or even platforms that I
would argue are not necessarily independent that sometimes
put out information that you can see is
very true. Or even corporate media sometimes puts
information out that even though they have an
agenda, you can still find the source material
that still may value you. The idea or
be valuable.
The idea to pretend like that's the only
place, that is the propaganda. I mean, that
is really stupid. And the only people that
seem to fall for that are people that
are going, Woo hoo, we're winning. Look at
us. We're on the side that's changing everything.
And then just like last time, you just
keep going.
Right? That's what they said last time with
Trump. I hope they were right then too.
But this says, this is an interesting take.
Here's Grok two's opinion on Grok three's response.
I thought this was hilarious, and you could
do this for yourself. It says, the information
is a well regarded technology and business news
publication known for its in-depth reporting and analysis.
It focuses on the tech industry, startups, venture
capital, and emerging trends. I'm willing to bet
you that they said something bad about Elon
Musk. It's probably why he did that. It
says off that's just my opinion. Often, providing
insights that go beyond surface level coverage, its
subscription based model allows it to maintain a
high level of independence and avoid the ad
driven noise that plagues mother. This is his
grok currently in existence.
So, again, I'm not familiar with the platform,
but don't you find that interesting?
And it says, I find it valuable, this
is Grok, for for its detailed scoops, thoughtful
commentary, and access to insider perspectives, especially on
Silicon Valley. That doesn't mean that they're all
true.
Right? I mean, any platform could be deceiving,
and the person telling the platform could be
lying about it. But it says Silicon Valley
and global tech developments. However, its payroll can
be a barrier for some, and its niche
focus might not appeal to readers looking for
broader news coverage if you're interested in deep
dives in a tech and business as a
solid resource. What are your thoughts on it,
or is there a specific aspect you'd like
to explore? It says and he shares the
picture of what Elon just shared. And so
this picture of what Grok three said when
asked about the same subject, what do you
think about this? Do you agree? This is
interesting.
And it says, it seems Roc three has
a very strong opinion against traditional media outlets
like The Information. That's fair. I would say
I do too. But it says suggesting that
they are biased and sub and as in
what Elon is putting forward is biased and
severe and serve specific interest rather than providing
objective news.
That's funny to me.
Now either way you look at it, the
point is that clearly,
we all have bias, these guys. We all
do. Anybody pretending they don't is the the
most dishonest person in the room.
The point is to understand that and to
consider that and stand back and go, okay.
What could I could I be missing something
because of this? Most people just don't do
that anymore because they've fallen into this ideological
black hole that we seem to be existing
in right now.
But this is simply going, well, they seem
to you know, they're that their their their
bias if it was an AI giving you
a balanced perspective, it wouldn't say what he
put out there. Because that is a very
opinionated, subjective opinion.
It is. And it says,
I understand the sentiment regarding the potential for
bias in media, but I don't fully agree
with the blanket dismissal of the information or
legacy media as garbage. See, that's just being
objective. Now I agree
that I'm more skeptical than anything
of anything in the corporate media. But to
blanket statement anything, remember, that used to be
broadly acknowledged as simply ignorance because very few
things, if any, are all one thing. And
it says, while it's true that all media
can't have biases, the information is known for
in-depth investigative journalism and history insights, which can
be quite valuable. And, guys, a lot of
people think that.
See, a lot of people think about Fox
News and CNN. Right? The point is that
you are making this about Elon's inner circle
perspective of the world and jamming that into
your new AI. That's what we're all worried
about and how this works.
It says regarding the comparison to Twitter, while
social media platforms can offer real time, unfiltered
perspectives, they also come with their own set
of challenges like misinformation,
lack of editorial oversight. I believe there's value
in both traditional media for its depth and
analysis and social media for its immediacy and
directness. See, I think Grok has been filtering
and absorbing all the information and has somewhat
became balanced, at least in the way this
is being presented now. I guarantee because it's
been it's gotten a lot of false information
too that it's probably a mixed bag. What
I think is hilarious is that you're gonna
see him go, well, we can't have that.
We can't have it showing something with even
giving any light in the conversation to the
idea that maybe they're not lying because that
ruins our narrative. So this is all my
opinion, but I want you guys to think
about this. It says I believe there's value
in both.
It says, the balanced approach where one cross
referenced information from various sources might be more
beneficial than dismissing one entirely in favor of
another. My God. How would anybody pretend that's
an unbalanced opinion? That's exactly what we're all
saying.
Look at it for yourself.
Question it. Do not blindly believe it. Look
for different sources. Look to other sources. Compare
them. Come to your conclusion. My god. And
he goes, no. We gotta get rid of
this. We gotta put in one that says
what I think. If you don't realize by
now that's what Elon Musk is, I don't
have any hope for you. I mean, my
god. This is insane.
And Marcel says, wasn't Grok supposed to be
neutral in truth AI?
While that take might not be inaccurate, it
does sound a little bit biased and emotionally
opinionated rather
than anybody with a brain can see that.
And that's not to say
that independent or corporate media is
honest.
It's just that you can also sense very
clearly that that is a very emotional opinionated
stance, which is not artificial intelligence or not
in this case the the way they're presenting
it. It's a, I would argue, just a
program doing what they want. Now what's funny
about this is I had this on Grok
asking it something,
and I simply tried to move the tab
and it just all disappeared. And it even
changed what I had written there. I just
think, thanks, Twitter. Fantastic. Totally not weird sensors.
But here's what I had written since I
had screenshot it, and I just thought it
was funny. I asked him, is Elon censoring
on Twitter? And it says there have been
numerous allegations that he censored individuals on Twitter,
particularly those who could critique his views or
actions. For example, several conservative influencers claimed that
he, and they did, we all know it,
censored their accounts or demonetized them after and
removed their badges after he criticized topics like
immigration.
H one b. We all know that. He
got caught roundly. Major people called him out
for it that like, million follower accounts.
This one, he defended some actions, but or
Musk has defended some actions by explaining that
the platform's algorithm reduces the reach of accounts
that are frequently muted or blocked. All they
did with that was create shadow banning. Well,
they continued the practice.
What that means is then the powerful influencers
that don't like that we're putting truth in
the conversation can all block and and man
you, and then all of a sudden, you
get suppressed. And I'm seeing that happen more
than ever. I'm seeing all these ridiculous people
just make one comment and block me right
away.
That's probably what's happening. It's a it's a
it's an automated function at this point to
just just jam you into a corner. Why
would you ever allow something like that? It's
obviously manipulatable. But they know that. That's why
it's happening.
Reports suggest under Musk, leadership x has compiled
complied
with government requests
for content removal at a higher rate than
before. That's Grok telling you that because it's
true, and we've already proven that. Whether it's,
Garm,
which in his own lawsuit made that clear,
or just the government aspects in the same
lawsuit showed you that over 90 something percent
of the time, they're complying with what the
government's asked for. I guess that's what it
looks like to fight the deep state. Right?
Now here's something that Spiro shared.
And I do think this is pretty terrifying
because of where we're going and what we're
just talked about. I don't understand
what world we live in if the people
that were just fighting the great reset and
COVID nineteen and all the rest are suddenly
ignoring something like this.
Sense.
But now there are people who do threads,
and by the way, there may be multiple
people who've done, you know, an article that
has a thousand words. Technically, all thousand words
could have made it onto x somehow.
And effectively, now you have this remarkable
repository.
And I wonder what you how you think
about that again, and how you think the
creative community, and those who were the original
IP owners should think about that.
I don't know except to say that by
the time these lawsuits are decided we'll have
digital God. So,
ask to ask digital God at that point.
See, people wanna laugh right there. You heard
them start to laugh and he's not he's
not joking. We'll have dig digital god by
then. Who knows? Maybe that's the Zionist direction.
Maybe they've now turned into the idea that
it's some kind of technocratic god. Right? That's
that's I mean, that would not surprise me
at this point.
The idea, though, is he is not joking
right there.
Is that what you want? Now maybe you
think he's just saying it's inevitable. Either way,
if that's the case, why are we allowing
them to roll out the artificial intelligence? That's
what they're doing. He's leading the charge, guys.
Those who were the
don't know except to say that by the
time these lawsuits are decided, we'll have digital
god. So
that's that's digital god at that point.
The
By the way, he's still wearing the Israeli
hostage tag,
Right? That that's based on an entirely falsified
atrocity propaganda narrative. These lawsuits won't be decided
before
in a time frame that is relevant.
Is that a good thing or a bad
thing?
I think we live,
you know, there's that
I don't know if it's actually a real
Chinese thing or not, but
may you live an interesting time. Right. It's
apparently
not a good thing.
But
I I would prefer to personally, I would
prefer to live in interesting times.
And and we live in the most interesting
of times.
I think
for for a while I was like really
getting demotivated and losing sleep over
the sort of the threat of AI danger
and then I finally sort of became fatalistic
about it and said well,
even if I knew it was
annihilation was certain,
would I choose to be alive
at that time or not? And I said
probably would choose to be alive at that
time because it's the most interesting thing.
Even if there's nothing I could do about
it. So then, you know, then basically, sort
of a fatalistic resignation
helped me sleep at night because I was
having trouble sleeping at night because of AI
danger.
This is incredible, but let's roll out the
program with the leading problematic people in the
world. That makes sense. Right?
The most the most genocidal, the most influential,
the most I mean, literally spying and collecting
data on everybody while funding terrorist organizations. But
let's give them that power and that'll save
us from the bad future. Right? Now to
be clear, this is not some brand new
video. So he's wearing that tag. I I
I I'm I but I not to suggest
he's doing it right now today, but who
knows?
Obviously, we know that support still exists, and
it's very clear. Oh, what what Spiro continued
to say,
Elon warns of becoming AI digital god. He
says AI is more dangerous than nuclear weapons.
He is building an AI robot army. Anyone
else freaked out by this?
That's like asking if the sky is blue.
How are you not? That's incredible.
WikiLeaks, by the way, just for pointing at
Elon Musk. I I again, didn't dive into
this much yesterday, but interestingly enough, WikiLeaks of
all people comes out and says, guess what?
Musk,
or,
what is that, actually?
How do you say that?
I've never seen that word before. I'll do
it's funny. I just breezed over this earlier
because I was sharing it off somebody. It
it's basically them saying that the Ashley St.
Clair discussion
has a link back to Israeli government.
And, oh, and and and the whole thing
is Mossad and the overlap there.
But it says Musk, that's just like a
slave, apparently, is what they're saying. Ashley Sinclair
is managed by PR strategist Brian Glicklitsch,
who previously received $598,000
from Israeli security company, Mer Security and Communications
Systems.
At the time,
reportedly to help Congo and avoid human rights
sanctions, Saint Claire says she's Jewish.
Whatever what what part of that matters to
you? Consider it. I'm never the one to
argue that simply because somebody's Jewish, therefore, there
I think that's disgusting and stupid. The truth
is there's plenty of Jewish people calling out
Zionism all over the world right now that
don't believe what Israel's doing. My point, though,
is it does very clearly overlap with Zionism,
so it's worth considering. The point is that
clearly that has an obvious connection to whether
or not and the the I guess, if
you haven't seen the story, the point is
that she has now admitted to having, Musk's
baby. And the timing of it does seem
interesting when you look at the timing of
how all this went and Elon Musk's kind
of weird shift into what he's doing along
with Israel.
So people are arguing and have had in
the past, by the way, that she has
intelligence connections. You can look at it for
yourself.
She's even stated that she gets paid by
Mossad, but to me, it clearly looks like
she's joking when she says that, but maybe
that's the way you troll with the truth
to hide it. Nonetheless,
that is provable, and WikiLeaks can show you
directly from Times of Israel. So shouldn't that
matter?
I would argue it does.
Here is interest Insurrection Barbie, who is one
of the most, like, blatant, like, ob like,
obviously, like, on the surface, sycophant, Elon Musk,
no matter what, all in because they're benefiting
from it.
920,000
subscribers
or followers. God only knows how many I
mean, I wonder if you can even see
how many subscribers they have. They probably hide
it these days.
Only two on that one, actually. That's I
find that really hard to believe, to be
honest. But, like, for example, Laura Loomer apparently
was, you know,
200,000,
whatever they said. I can't confirm that,
which just seems crazy to me when that's
that's a hell of a lot of money
every month.
But she simply says, stop with this BS.
Here's the post. WikiLeaks exposes the mother of
Elon Musk's new child, Ashley St. Clair, as
being managed by PR strategist strategist Brian Glicklick,
who previously received almost $600,000
from an Israeli security firm.
Okay. What what exactly is stopped with this?
Wait. Are we are are you denying this
information, or are you pretending like that's not
relevant?
No. They I simply said, yeah. Stop with
all these annoying facts that ruin the partisan
hopium narrative. How dare you?
Silly.
But the point is, get out of here
with that. We don't wanna hear anything that
doesn't make us feel like we're winning. Shut
up. Those are the new media, guys. Listen
up. That's the new guard. He's gonna usher
you into the golden age of your technocratic
prison.
Now on the concept of the bird flu
overlap, another very important follow-up. Because this is
one that we talked about yesterday that got
incredible pushback. And here's what I wanna say
before I get into this, what I noticed
in this.
We get these moments where we're ahead of
the story.
We talk about the idea of something that
we not not because some partisan point or
because some news channel gave it to you
or or because some you know, because we
looked into the data.
Because other people shared it on Twitter, by
the way, and we shouted them out last
time and looked into the actual material, looked
for the source material, and found, oh, look
at that. That does seem to be something
that's happening. And, yes, it did happen into
Trump's administration. That's very relevant. And then I
reported it. Not because CNN said so or
Fox said so or some Ian Miles Chong
pointed to it because we looked into it
and we thought that it was factual.
And because others on this platform were like,
that's nowhere. I don't see any of your
lying. That's not true. And they just shout
it down. And I'll show it to you
right now.
And that was simply the idea that they
had conditionally approved a bird flu injection for
birds, for poultry.
Very still very true. And I'll show you
again.
That is very clearly a deviation from what
RFK has been saying and even what Trump
wants, what people pretend he's trying to do,
even though he's very clearly still promoting all
of it and rolling out an m r
an mRNA cancer shot along with everything else
that we're gonna we've talked about.
But I think it's important to see
how quickly that happens and and importantly to
show why TLav and others in this field
are important.
Because we're not just following along on some
other leading platform. We're doing the actual work.
And usually, that gets buried because it doesn't
it's not partisan entry. It it gets, you
know, and usually ahead of it. So a
week later, somebody shares a screenshot and that
gets all, hey. Whatever. As long as the
truth gets out. But that's honestly what happen
what doesn't happen quite often. But on this,
the story was originally,
Trump admin approves poultry jab for avian flu.
What's gonna be a follow-up today is that
this has now been even further verified by
them speaking to Fox News.
That's my point. So today is when you're
gonna see all this reported even by people
that wanted to report on it because they
just waited for something to be point to
instead of just doing the background work.
So this is what we showed you. This
was from the fourteenth. US conditionally approves vaccine
to protect poultry from avian flu. You can
read into it. It's very clear. It's Trump's
administration,
and that's the fourteenth. So, technically, you could
try to give the RFK a pass somehow
as being, you know, just like the day
before
Confirmed.
But, nonetheless, he was confirmed, and now it's
happening. He could stop it. Just like the
other just like the MRA point I'll make
in a second.
But, nonetheless, you could argue that maybe he
wasn't the one that made the decision. I
certainly hope not because that would be a
huge deviation,
unless we're being misled.
Now I shared this after Peter Mercola shared
this on the sixteenth. Same point, saying US
conditionally approves the avian flu vaccine for poultry.
Remember, Donald Trump approved 01/2020
before, but no different than Biden. It's just
important for those that don't believe Trump's the
one willing to do this. Vaccine cartel gets
closer to realizing its dream of vaccinating three
hundred and eight million eggs laying egg laying
hens in The US, even though leaky vaccines
are likely to result in new pathogens. That's
his main point. If they use these, he
argues that that it's gonna cause the very
problem they pretend they're trying to fight, maybe
by design, which is exactly what I do
think.
So I simply highlighted as well directly from
the link article I just showed you, which
shows that it is his well, rather, the
US Department of Agriculture, which HHS is the
one that approved for it. It's it's all
under that umbrella. And it very clearly says
that Donald Trump's administration
carried this out. And now one step forward,
and I don't think I included it in
the screenshot, but they then have to approve
the actual use on chickens. They've conditionally approved
the injection to be prepared for that purpose.
My point is now we're seeing that that
is continuing.
And I said, hopefully, honest conservatives will have
the integrity to call this out. If RFK
stays silent on this, I will say quite
a lot. I still have not heard a
word about this from him.
Now additionally, separate story. Hear that. Make sure
you understand it's not the same point. Same,
category.
This is from HHS. And what's interesting is
it is in archive, but you can still
look it up directly from the actual page.
Like, if you search for this,
it's on the website still. So I it's
I just under it's weird. Jeffrey Tucker is
the one that asked about this. Because here
it is. HHS.
Right? Here's the link. And it takes you
to this, but it says archive at the
top.
So I I don't know. I don't know.
I like, my thought before was they were
trying to get rid of that. Hide it,
but the link still pops up. Maybe but
that's how the Internet works. Right? Because, technically,
this is not showing up on the main
page. You have to find it that way
by the title.
To me, like I said before well, let
me read it to you first. It says
HHS provides $590,000,000
to accelerate pandemic influenza, mRNA based vaccine
development. Now as I said, that's January 17,
'3 days before Trump was inaugurated.
So very easily, this is Biden. Right? The
point was that this is now going forward.
And as far as I could tell, it
hasn't even truly been allotted yet. Right now,
they have the ability to stop it. Even
if there's already been funds that have been
sent, they can put an end to this.
Especially since they don't seem to care even
if legally they weren't allowed to, they don't
seem to care about legally breaking treaties and
agreements and anything else around the world. So
we're gonna pretend like somehow they're bound to
this, but they're allowing all sorts of other
crazy things. That's just dishonesty.
That is exactly what we are pretending they're
fighting.
Or I always say keep doing that. That
they're pretending they're fighting. That we are all
actually fighting. So that's important to see.
And it's going forward, as far as I
could tell, still right now.
Now I posted this show yesterday. There's the
title, Trump admin approves poultry jab for avian
flu.
And this person says, because some people say
it's not true. Basically, you'll find a lot
of people down there going, that can't be
true, and I'll show you one next. And
this person's just going and I I disagree
with this tactic because all you're showing is
a screenshot of articles of platforms that I,
myself, would be very skeptical of. Right? But
the point is it is roundly being discussed,
and it is true. It's easy to verify.
We did it on the last show.
But this person said, I believe Trump doesn't
trust any of these news outlets because they
lie, which I we all agree that, but,
you know, shouldn't ignore them either. He's definitely
right about that. Any reliable sources? And I
said, well, if this is important, I want
everyone to hear this. I know most of
you on this platform that follow this channel
already think like this. But in case you
don't,
it's about the source material.
Doesn't matter what platform it comes from. I
mean, it obviously has a it matters. But
when you in the context of trying to
find out whether this is true, it's irrelevant.
It's about finding all the all the possible
data points you could find, doing your due
diligence,
and trying to find it back to the
actual source. So who said it? Where did
it come from? Right? So if you can
trace it back to a post from Donald
Trump, then clearly, whether or not CNN shared
it, you would argue it was true. Right?
So if you just dismiss it before you
look,
obviously, that's willful ignorance. And I said, look
for yourself, whether or not it's from CNN.
If some if someone is outright ignoring or
dismissing a report, wherever it's from or due
to where it's from, they are the ignorant
one in the situation.
So is the one blindly accepting it for
the same
reason. Find the actual source of the claim
and confirm it for yourself.
And she just added to that saying, I
found no source yet, but perhaps the person
has you know, so okay. That's a good
point then. So because they haven't
which by the way is not true. I
I show you the source. I already went
through it from the very articles they've list
right there. The point was, let's just say
you weren't able to find the source. Well,
then you wait. You don't continue to argue
one way or the other. The answer is,
well, we haven't verified that yet.
But see, so many people, usually partisans, are
incapable,
unwilling to do that.
And this person was the kind of thing
we're talking about. They say, no. We didn't.
Just flatly. Yeah. He did. And it says,
many other countries already implement vaccines for h
one n one. This is not about h
one n one. So these people aren't even
reading or looking at it. They're just rejecting
or reflexively pushing back because that's what they're
trained to do. And it says, though the
current administration has not agreed to such a
thing. Yes. They have, though. Trump did it
last time, so he doesn't even know what
he's talking about. I mean, I get I
get the sense the person thinks they're right.
That's just my gut. That they they're not
trying to be dishonest. They just think that
we're wrong. But you it's it's coming from
an emotional
trust place that you believe in them. And
they said they wouldn't even though you can
prove they've already have and this is yet
again happening.
And what's funny is everybody beneath him was
like, here it is. Yes. He did. And
he follows up on his own and goes,
right. Right? So acknowledging that it did actually
happen now even though he goes, no. He
didn't. It says, but no presidential power has
endorsed it. What does that mean?
The it Trump's administration
has endorsed this. They know it. It's very
public, and no one said and what I'm
gonna show you next is that, yes, they
did. And, yes, it's already going forward as
he said this on a public interview with
Fox News, Trump's administrative,
appointee.
But so it went very quickly from doesn't
exist to, yeah, well, okay, it is, but
they didn't actually endorse it. Well, then right
there, you need to go, okay. Take a
step back. I was wrong. There's something going
on here. But it goes just here so
people get the facts straight.
This is it's crazy. This this is probably
a bot for all we know, but I
said mental gymnastics deflection, and you're also wrong.
Here's the article from today. Let's take a
look at it.
Oh, and and shout out to simulation here
who's the one that shared the the first
article, which led me to the Fox News
article. Thank you for that. Trump admin shifting
strategy on avian flu.
So first, before we to go through this
overarching point, I wanna show you the way
this developed in a very couple of few
days, which
this first part is my opinion, but I
really do think that we're seeing this everywhere.
Very reactive, just like with Israeli propaganda that
shows you that they're trying to hide something
from you. So first,
February fifteenth. This is NBC. It simply says
Trump's drive to reshape government threatens birth through
response. Now that's what you keep you've been
hearing. Right? What Trump's doing is ruining everything,
which then allows people that support him to
be like, well, we disagree. That that means
that that's not true. Even though that could
still be true, then you could still support
the direction. Right? You could argue that him
doing this, even though I actually agree with
the larger discussion of stopping what they're doing
in all of this, the biosecurity
dynamic, like, I'm of the mind whether you
believe in virus or not. Like, let's just
take it from the virus conversation of pretending
germ theory is accurate. The idea being, for
sake of conversation,
that natural immunity is the conversation.
Right? Or we could talk about the deeper
conversation, but that's not the place for that
today where maybe we're absolutely misunderstanding all of
it, which is more which the way I'm
leaning at this point. But I still don't
think there's everything has been fleshed out in
that conversation. My point is that if natural
immunity is the conversation, which is that's what
doctor McCullough is pushing for, then the whole
vaccine and biosecurity, it's all it's really the
the thing causing all the problems, which is
what a lot of people have been saying
for a very long time. And if we
were to allow these things to run their
course, yeah, people would die. But that also
happens in a lot of natural organic ways
every single moment of our lives. That things
would happen, people would die in some cases,
but the majority of people, which is what
the argument was for vaccination, would end up
having some kind of resistance. And then we
would move forward, it wouldn't be a problem.
It's amazing how natural immunity became the conspiracy
theory. Ask Mother Jones, that article about this
dangerous theory. It's embarrassing.
But overall, the point was they're pushing back
on this going, he's ruining this. His whole
thing is hurting our responsibility.
Our
responsibility.
And so I think, again, I don't agree
with that in general, but what's interesting was
on the fifteenth,
it says, White House National Economic Council
director Kevin Hassett said in an interview with
MSNBC
that the Trump administration would soon have a
strategy now that Rollins has been confirmed. So
they've kinda been playing like, well, we just
gotta get our team in order and so
on. And then the other side, if you
will, has been using that to make the
case that, oh, they're ruining all of our
preparedness,
which I think is by design because that's
easy to go. Well, that's not something I
think most people are uncomfortable about because of
COVID nineteen. So it makes you go they're
the wrong side, which means that's the right
side.
Maybe they're both wrong sides, guys. It's easy
to see how that works. But it goes,
quote, it turns out president Biden's team didn't
have an avian flu strategy. This is Trump's
administration speaking, has it? And now we're about
to have one.
As soon as broke, Brooke Rollins is at
the Department of Agriculture. So just interesting thought.
He's saying that Trump team didn't well, they
did. It was just destroying all the chickens
and destroying our food infrastructure, which I think
was absolutely part of the larger all of
our government plan. And now they're using that
as the counterbalance to roll in the next
part of it. But to go forward I
think that was it on oh, there's one
more. It says previously,
Kennedy,
RFK, has said currently available vaccines for avian
flu that The US has stockpiled may be
dangerous and ineffective.
One of which is Donald Trump's from 2020.
I agree. It says researchers are working on
developing a new generation of avian flu vaccines
based on the same mRNA
technology used to develop the COVID vaccines. We
just pointed to that,
which Kennedy called the deadliest vaccine ever made,
though studies have shown it to be safe.
That's, of course, that's NBC. But studies,
absurd. The fact that they're still trying to
argue that, it shows why they're propaganda, But
it doesn't mean you should ignore every single
thing that goes. Read it, consider it, question
it, skeptical, the whole thing, every time,
especially those that you truly believe in.
But what I think is interesting about that,
again, really quickly to jump at the end
of this,
he just said this in front of congress.
I don't know if they're dangerous. We have
a we don't have a good surveillance system.
Well, what do you mean? You just said
to everybody many times it was. Come back
to that. So that's just dishonesty. Playing the
game, if you will. Maybe you think that's
what's necessary. I'm our I argue today we
should be siding with our principles and our
integrity. But here's the next step. So this
is the next day, sixteenth. Politico comes out
with an article. Trump administration firing hit key,
fires hit. Wait.
Trump administration's
Trump administration
firing, excuse me, hit key office handling bird
flu response. Same kind of point.
And, of course, the fun thing right now
is, oh, that's the political USA thing. Just
ignore everything, which
which if you did that, you would actually
ignore something that is
ultimately, I think, helping your agenda. But what's
funny to me but either way, just question
everything. Consider all of it. If you don't
realize by now that USAID has been funding
a lot, including currently Reuters through Trump's administration,
if you look at it the same way,
then you're choosing to pick one up and
not the other. That's dishonesty. That's hypocrisy.
Anyway, that's not the point. The point is
Trump administration firings hit key office handling brute
force response. Now I think the reason this
is important, right and this is after, mind
you, the fourteenth, they already conditionally approved a
bird flu vaccine for for poultry.
And there seems to be one of the
works for Moderna for an mRNA shot. Right?
So three days later two days later, they
start firing all these people.
Okay.
So the same question applies.
Just getting rid of a lot of people,
how do you know those are the right
choices? Because you choose to believe Trump is
on your side.
I'm not saying I know they're not,
but you definitely don't either.
And so the point is, maybe they're getting
rid of all the people that were actually
fighting the deep state. You don't know.
At least if if you're at least willing
to admit that that's just your opinion, that's
okay. Then we can disagree.
Or hopefully agree that neither of us actually
know.
But what I'm simply pointing out is that
keeps happening.
We're usually, you can't even verify half this
stuff. They just reports of all these people.
But I think what that does is set
you up to think that he's hacking this
apart
when if you stand back and look, they're
continuing the agendas. So if this is this
a show to get you to stop paying
attention? Or is it to shave off some
funds so they can dump more on Israel,
which is what's happened every time? I don't
know. But I do think this is about,
in my opinion, trying to make it appear
as if while people are already upset about
what just happened, that they're actually going the
other direction. So you're gonna get all the
people which I've already gotten, shoving I've already
received, shoving this in front of you saying,
no. He's hacking it to pieces, and that's
just a remnant. It's not true.
Talk about it right now. This is just
my opinion on the timing, but I think
that's why that's happening. So they're reporting their
fire to a lot of people from the
very group they're now working through to bring
this out. White House scrambles, this is on
the seventeenth, to combat bird flu outbreaks and
blast Biden plan to just kill chickens. Oh,
okay. So now you've got them with the
mind that we're actually breaking it all apart.
So a lot of them already went to
sleep on this conversation. They're off to something
else that Elon shared today.
The next day, they come out and give
you the first step into why maybe we
should keep doing it.
Right? We're oh, we're scram and this is
independent. Right? Scrambles to combat bird flu, which
is not what I would agree with. But
that is what their administration is sort of
highlighting at this point and
says Biden's just killed all the chickens, sort
of like going, Clinton didn't build the biometric
wall. Well, like, oh, we should do it
then.
Can you did you just
very simply get manipulated into agreeing to the
very thing we all thought thirty seconds ago?
Yeah. Seems like you did. In this case,
if Biden killed all the chickens, then we
gotta vaccinate them. It's like, woah. What?
Well, many people are smart enough to not
see how to fall into that, but many
of them are not. And now all of
a sudden, if he killed them all, which
I don't agree with, the there's only one
other option, apparently, and that's what they're now
doing.
Here's Fox News.
New agriculture agriculture secretary
working on plan to control bird flu egg
prices.
It says again, this is on this is
today,
the seventeenth.
And it says, the White House is working
toward a plan to control the avian flu.
Well, even right there.
Is that what you believe?
I mean, I I wouldn't argue that the
vast majority of people that support him right
now argue that they don't even agree this
is a problem. But realize they're dumping money.
There's emergency overlaps to this. There's all sorts
of stuff happening around this right now just
like it was under Biden.
They just don't wanna talk about it.
And they all argue because they want to
believe that that there's some secret. It's all
about a play. They're just saying that to
get you to run. Whatever. Telling all the
queue talking points that never seem to come
to pass. And it says, which will help
lower egg prices that have skyrocketed due to
the inflation
and how the Biden administration killed all the
chickens
to contain the spread of the disease,
national economic director,
council director Kevin Hassett said Sunday.
I mean, the fact that they killed all
these chickens is just insane to me. It
really is. Like, it it shows you that
they are acting irrationally under the guise of
something that we I think most people even
a lot of very high level doctors and
scientists are arguing is I mean, you saw
Marinara herself saying, it's not actually a problem.
But please don't just take anybody's word for
it. Do your own research. But he goes
on to say the Biden plan was to
just, you know, kill chickens, and they spent
billions of dollars just randomly killing chickens within
a perimeter where they found a sick chicken,
which is crazy.
Then he says, Hassett well, then it says,
Hassett said the plan being worked on in
the Trump administration is to, quote,
have better ways with biosecurity
and medication
to make sure that the perimeter doesn't have
to kill the chickens.
Great. So Biden bad, killing chickens, so that
means that this is the good plan. Yay.
Trump good plan.
Even though you're now promoting a vaccine for
poultry,
which I can guarantee you
either already will without our knowledge or eventually
will be mRNA. That is where this is
all going, and they're all telling you that.
So Fox News,
Trump's appointee,
and
seventeenth
goes on to say, so having a smart
perimeter, a smart perimeter,
is what we're working on.
And you know exactly what that means. And
we're finalizing the ideas about how to do
that with the best scientists in the government.
And that's the kind that's what you're gonna
go over there doing it the best the
right way this time. So the very people
and these are all different parts. I guarantee
you're gonna hear. People that were thirty seconds
ago telling you that this shouldn't happen at
all are now gonna rationalize why it's okay
because now Trump's doing it the right way.
The one that still tells you that the
COVID nineteen shot is safe and effective.
It says, and that's the kind of thing
that should have happened a year ago.
And if it had, then egg prices would
be, you know, a lot better than they
are now. Probably not.
So here we are.
One more thing. It says sources tell Fox
Business that culling of infected flocks is current
US protocol.
But more research and development is needed to
control and even prevent
outbreaks, such as vaccinating birds.
Right. So this is all from the same
source, guys. They're literally talking to Trump's administration.
Seems like that matters.
Now continuing the conversation, strengthening biosafety and biosecurity
standards. Oh, I'm sorry. My mistake. That's actually
from 2023 under Biden. Whoopsie.
Or it's just a continuation of the same
damn thing under a different narrative with a
different flavor, and too many people are falling
for it. See what I did there? Now
here, this is AgWeb. This is what they
shared before. Now this is this is this
from my perspective,
this is clearly correct based on what I
just showed you, based on the source coming
from his own point.
But before I saw the Fox News extension
of that and followed that up to the
actual quote,
I wasn't aware I I I wouldn't have
shown you this. Because from my perspective, there's
nothing that proves it in this article. It's
just it's just text on this page and
basically and then rests on the site's cloud,
which even if it's one of the most
respected things in the world, you would still
go, well, where's the source material? That's how
we have to be today. But now that
we have shown you that that is the
case, this is what they're reporting on. Trump
administration shift strategy on avian flu, which, by
the way, should give them a huge pump
right now because that means they are ahead
of everybody. Like, when you search this title,
I find it in two places, here and
some other other site that I've never heard
of. I saw this one first, so that's
worth sharing.
I think that's a that's a good on
them for being that far ahead of this.
This was shared yesterday.
Think about that. Spearheaded by National Economic Council
director Kevin Hassett and US and this is
what they do, obviously, ag agriculture,
And USDA secretary, Brooke Rollins, the plan prioritizes
enhanced biosecurity measures and medication,
exactly like he told you, to control the
spread of the virus and moves away from
mass culling of infected flocks, which is also
a good thing that we shouldn't that moving
away from it. We shouldn't allow mass culling
of animals.
Problem reaction solution. It says the Trump administration
is rolling out a new strategy to combat
avian flu, moving away from mass culling of
infected flocks, spearheaded by the people we just
listed. The plan prioritizes enhanced biosecurity measures, medications.
Now it says the key points, biosecurity medication,
improved containment protocols,
a guarantee that's artificial intelligence, and medication aimed
to reduce reliance on widespread calling,
which, by the way, as they said at
the bottom, is still actually the protocol. So
I'm willing to bet you they're still gonna
do that
if this doesn't seem feasible or whatever else,
or they just want to for some other
propaganda style reason. Smart perimeter approach. Targeted containment
methods will enhance efficiency
in preventing outbreaks.
The efficiency, technocratic movement all over the place.
They're working with AI on everything. Collaboration.
Government scientists and global academic experts
are contributing to the plan's development.
Global active yeah. So we're talking about the
same people that you just don't wanna admit
or have worked. I mean, we've already seen
the overlapping connections between the WHO, the United
Nations, and Bill Gates, and everything to Trump's
current administration. We've been going over since the
beginning. The team sport politics, people just don't
wanna look at it.
Vaccine approval. We already told you this. If
you wanna know more about this, look at
yesterday's show. ZOTIS received conditional SD USD approval
from the avian flu. Now I showed you
the one that is the work that led
to this, and it shows right on the
right on the on their own study.
Twenty percent of the birds gave them this
injection showed very provable shedding
of the very thing they claim they're trying
to stop from spreading.
I mean, I think that's ridiculous.
It should be. Industry support, major poultry and
dairy organizations back vaccines used to control the
virus.
Well, that's where they're going.
Shout out to Ag Webb and what they
followed on this because they're ahead of everybody.
Let's look for a picture with that. Now
this one is just to show you at
the end of this that, you know,
either he's just playing the game here
or he's showing you the reality.
He doesn't know if they don't work? Well,
he just went on a a years long
stare
of telling you explicitly
that these were the most dangerous things in
the world.
And now you say that? I mean, how
do you not see that that's a problem?
I mean, even if you think he's playing
the game to get elected, well, okay, then
then
but they're not changing the game.
Or maybe you hope they do going forward.
I sure hope so too. But at least
you're I I at least hopefully you're going
well. Maybe that's not the case. And then
realize that you're just hoping that. And that
seems pretty childish with what's going on right
now.
Now getting into the spending overlap that we
just showed you.
Case you didn't see in the beginning,
my point in all of this was for
all those again that were
still misrepresenting the story about the Thomas Reuters
Thomas Reuters special services
and who rightly care about the political story
because it matters,
does it now matter to you that I
just found out that Donald Trump is currently
funding Reuters new services?
That's not to say one the way or
the other. You can decide if you think
of the problem. My point is simply that
if your logic is consistent, it should bother
you if you cared about the other one.
So here is the actual page.
Started in 2022 under Biden and has now
been continued by Donald Trump.
Wire services for news stories.
And again, Reuters news. So not some
DOD
contractor that underneath that umbrella there's a Reuters
news aspect, but literally Reuters news. Wonder why
Ian Miles Chong didn't scream about this one.
I think you all know why, because they
have a very clear mandate of propagandizing
for one very clear partisan agenda.
Twenty twenty five,
February thirteenth, a few days ago,
$733,000
for Reuters, Newswire services.
Now, again, certainly could be exactly what Politico
was or exactly what any of these things
were. Right? The funding of news agencies. By
the way, Politico's point was we're they're just
simply buying in for our our our NewsWire
services. That's what they claimed.
Right? Okay. So if you disregard that, then
why would you be okay with this one?
You get where I'm going with this, guys.
There's dishonesty all over this conversation, and it's
a partisan
waterfall of nonsense right now as they only
couch everything on one side of this, which
guarantees it will never actually change. I've been
saying that for a decade.
So if you wanna look further, it's all
right here for you. That's just one small
example. As well as this one that I
recommend you do check out because of how
obviously
ridiculous this story is. And how even Trump
pushed it further three days later, screaming about
how it was lefty Reuters News who got
$9,000,000
for and give all the money back,
even though he is the predominant funder of
that discussion. You can look for yourself. The
vast majority of the funding for this exact
thing they're all screaming about happened under Trump's
administration.
So if Trump's asking for the money back,
then maybe he should be the one getting
it back because they're the ones that gave
it to him. So or why they would
even be the ones to do it? Is
he asking for the news agency or is
he asking Biden to give it back? It's
all a big lie. They are the ones
responsible. And I'm not saying it's only Trump.
I'm saying it's all of them. That's the
honest way to cover this because it's the
easily
it's objectively clear in my opinion.
Source down below.
Of course, now here's Alex Jones saying Reagan
Doe discovers USAID secretly funnels $4,000,000,000 to Bill
Gates.
And dishonesty kills me.
You mean the funding
to all the date the the public funding
on record that you can look up right
now about the money that went to Bill
Gates and USAID and or rather through to
Gavi and WHO?
Yeah. I disagree with all of it. I
also disagree with the fact that it was
a very clear manipulation where that money tripled
into Gavi last administration through Trump. And now
even this time, Trump met with Bill Gates,
and they're now rolling out operation warp speed
two point o, which is called Stargate.
Exactly what Gates told you.
And Jones is a dishonest manipulator who's actively
pushing out the the very transparent one-sided narratives
that are all being cultivated for him by
the rebels fighting the deep state.
And another 880,000,000
to the World Health Organization,
which I disagree with. Are we really pretending
like this is not continuing in every way?
Or that all of this happened in those
last administration? No. Yes. No one is saying
that stopping these things is a bad thing
in this current conversation. Some people are. What
I'm trying to highlight for you is, has
that even happened?
Of course, it has. Jones said so. Okay.
Could did you prove it? Did he show
you a piece of paper of a Twitter
shot on his desk? Or did you actually
look into finding
the actual
allotment,
the then termination of that agreement
on record.
Well, you would. Right? If this is real,
you would be able to find it, and
somebody honest would give you a source link
to be able to check it for yourself.
But not this great fighting rebel platform.
It's it's guys, this, in my opinion, is
happening because of what we're doing. Not just
us, but anybody else who is basically very
easily
breaking down how dishonest all this is, and
you get people like this that just screech
whatever they were just told. How much you
wanna bet they haven't even verified this? Which
is what you hear from anybody who's now
fled this platform like a David Knight or
any of the rest of them. They say
they're or Richard Grove, for example. They say
they basically just run with whatever they need
to without even checking it.
I've seems pretty obvious to me.
John o loo John o'Looney says, so when
is Trump going to round these criminals up?
Ah, and the right point. What about Fauci
and Bill Gates and all the people that
were responsible,
which they are?
Okay. So if they're illegally sending all this
money and it was Democrats, well, wouldn't you
go arrest Joe Biden and go arrest Bill
Gates? Of course not.
Some flimsy reason why that wouldn't make sense
even though that's what they all expected.
It's very sad to me. Now on that
very point, guys,
here's a clip of Leave It
telling you some new things.
And absolutely in no way, shape, or form
verifying or proving any of it. Holding up
some papers and saying things. You know, like
Gaza condoms, for example, that was very, very
false. Or other 47 stories we've shown you
in the last couple of weeks.
But this guy says, bloody hell, you have
to see this.
Oh, watch for yourself.
Need to be on our hearts and the
president and this administration are committed to ensuring
that these individuals get the funding that they
need. And I would just say a strong
message to Democrats
who are out there,
pretending to be outraged about the long list
of crap that this administration is cutting federal
waste and funding, like $2,000,000
for sex changes in Guatemala,
Six Million to fund tourism in Egypt,
Twenty Million on a new Sesame Street. I
was muted. I said, in case you missed
it, it's just writing on a piece of
paper. Okay? Just like she did with the
Gaza condoms, which were fundamentally false, exact objectively
incorrect.
Not not even the, oh, well, it went
to another country. Nope. I already made I
showed you that as well. The amount they
claim of just condoms is ridiculous,
and it was a amount and I'm not
agreeing with the funding. If if that's your
assumption, then you're doing the same thing. You're
still the problem. The clear point is none
of that's okay with me. But it's also
important to be accurate and not couch it
on one side of the argument when all
of them are doing it or lying about
it entirely.
It was $50,000,000
that went to Mozambique, which I don't agree
with, for I think it was like STD
prevention. Probably included some con condom dynamic, which
I still disagree with. But to pretend it
was $50,000,000 in condoms to one location one
time when they spent $7,000,000
for the entirety of 2023
for for cons. It's just it's guys, it's
provably incorrect
like they do all the time, though.
Like I think she's doing right now. Show
in Iraq,
4,500,000.0
to combat disinformation in Kazakhstan.
I could go on and on, and I'm
happy to provide this list to every single
one of you. Now anybody out there screaming
about these things, have you looked them up?
First, to make sure they're even real. I'm
not suggesting I would I even know that
they're not. I'm simply point the one point
I'm making first in here is how many
people choose to accept this right now without
ever looking anything further. Because she said so,
and she's on our side.
Okay. She was already wrong, by the way,
very easily, very thirty seconds ago.
But on top of that, okay. Let's just
say they are real. Have you looked them
up? Have you checked what they're doing? Have
you checked that the accurate prescriptions are correct?
Have you checked that they're not couching on
one side of a paradigm when all of
them were supporting it? Which most of these
things are like that. You can very easily
show that Donald Trump continued basically all of
the same things. Or the idea remember the
FFA conversation where they were screaming about the
woke website, and that was all it was
the same website of the Trump's administration. The
exact same FFA website with the exact same
disability
but I guess that doesn't matter.
It really is insane to me how obvious
this stuff is.
Democrats are outraged that the American people want
to be,
You gotta print it out piece of paper.
Okay? Now, yes, I'm not saying in this
moment, we would be proven something, but you
as a journalist would not accept that.
You shouldn't. That means you're not a journalist
if you're just running with the fun story
because it makes you feel like you're winning.
They want their taxpayers going to good uses,
not stuff like this. But then they're very
quiet about the fact that there are still
North Carolinians
and people in California
who have lost everything. And in the last
four years, this federal government did nothing to
help them.
Obviously inaccurate, but I agree they didn't do
very little they did very little
which far more could have been done, but
clearly they did some things. So that's, you
know, accuracy and facts matter. My point though
is that what's happening now?
Is Trump helping Lahaina? Is he Trump is
he helping California
or or North Carolina for that matter? And
I've I've heard a lot of statements, and
I've heard some things happen. There's already been
funding that was already beginning before. Now just
to claim this, my point is, are you
looking into any of this stuff
while they're giving $7.08,
$910,000,000,000
to Israel so far on top of what
Trump allowed in 2020 going forward, which is
$338,000,000,000
over ten years, which was same thing Obama
did, by the way, but they all continue
it. The point is they shave a billion
dollars early, they claim, and say, we shaved
a billion dollars just like that, and then
immediately give a billion dollars to Israel.
Then they went through another week and they
shaved all this other money off and then
gave $7,400,000,000
to Israel.
On top of everything else, they already gave
them a year, by the way, just like
Biden did. Now if that doesn't matter to
you, then you have very clear blinders on.
If you're saving all this money and then
just dumping it in the hands of a
genocidal government or any government for that matter,
then you're not really saving anything. You're moving
money around.
And I argue that the whole game of
chopping down these really stupid programs, which, by
the way, weren't about sex changes in Afghanistan.
They were about regime change and CIA operations,
and that's what this was actually for. These
things were used as cover. And, yes, people
with involved in them, some of them didn't
know that. But the same reason that they
continued under whatever vehicle they were using during
Trump's administration for Venezuela, for Iran,
all over the place.
This president will continue to put Americans first,
and I think the successes of this week
so far speak to that, and it's only
Wednesday. So Yeah. Like, just buy it and
go forward. Right? Well, here's what he said
on this.
Well, I said stopping I said stopping all
of this verifiably ridiculous bipartisan
spending, because it is, over numerous administrations left
and right is a good thing.
If it actually happens and is not dishonestly
couched on one side,
which they're doing.
But have you, by chance, verified that any
of those claims are true?
I'm just curious.
At this point, I literally have not even
looked into it. I just wanted to see
what the response would be. And he says,
yes. They are. Okay. And I said, okay.
Great. I'd I'd love to see the source
material. Can you post it below or whatever
it is that allows you to be certain
that this is true? Since no one would
be responsible enough to just take the government
at their word, especially when she just shared
the fake gods of condoms story.
He says, look to Elon and Doge. They've
been posting dozens of receipts since it started.
Well, really quickly, by the way. No. They
have not. And you can prove that because
that's all it says. Receipts are coming over
the weekend. That's the current website, by the
way.
So does he not know that? Is he
lying? Is he pretending? Or someone told him
that and didn't check it for himself? I
don't know. But it's not true.
And I said, can you provide one? Right?
Receipts? You must have them since you seem
so certain. And no, they have not. That's
the stuff I just showed you. The site
only points to their tweets, and the ongoing
promise of receipts has not come to pass.
I'm not even claiming that I know it's
not true, but I think you know what
I'm pointing out here. And he goes, I
know you're wasting my time.
You he now sees what I'm doing. He
says loads on the Doge timeline. Oh, on
Twitter. Okay. So statements on Twitter with no
source material. No ev no evidence will satisfy
you, he says.
Go bother somebody else. Weirdly enough, based on
our continued engagement, he seems to kinda come
around. And I said, thank you for making
my point. I will and already have go
over the Doge site, and I'll show you
in a second, and the timeline once again
on the show today. And it will be
clear to anyone honest that you are simply
choosing to believe what is typed on this
platform with nothing else to back it up.
That's sad.
And I said, by the way, feel free
to prove me wrong at any time by
simply posting a single example of something other
than text on Twitter proving these things have
happened.
Just post a tweet below that you keep
pointing out that should share the source material
or anything other than text. Please, one thing
just to prove me wrong.
Didn't happen. And I said also said, by
the way, in case you actually don't know,
the current website is like that.
But he simply said, I will watch, which
I I I, you know, maybe means that.
Good. I like I'm I'm glad.
And I said, fantastic. And just in case
he missed that, I shared
it. But he goes on then, and I
and I said, by the way, the site's
not there. And he goes, I'll wait to
see if it fills up.
Ah, so here's what I think is really
fascinating. And what actually kinda shows me this
guy may actually have been, you know, be
honest. Right? And he just was being misled,
which is a very part of the big
part of this conversation, is that now he's
going, I'll wait to see if it fills
up. But maybe he looked at the site
and was like, oh, maybe the receipts aren't
there. Maybe I was misled.
Good. That's fantastic. And he says, have you
been watching the same stuff over here? He
says, Royer Royer Stewart,
his wife's business, lost a million, art for
Afghanistan or something. That's not you know, all
these claims flying around. Let's prove them. How
about that? And I said, as we all
should, in regard to waiting for it to
fill up. Right?
My only point is that we should obviously
not pretend we know just because she holds
up paper and says these things out loud,
especially since they have already been caught in
lies, not mistakes,
Demonstrable lies. For example and I'll play this
in as part of it. And he says,
thank you. They admitted it was wrong the
wrong country, I think. One hell of a
mistake. But, again, I said, watch the clip.
It was more than that. They made up
the entire condom aspect. It was 50,000,000
for STD prevention. And no, I do not
agree with that, but facts matter. And he
doubled down after that. That's dishonesty.
So, please watch it right now. I hope
so.
I think that's really clear. Not not whether
we know for sure whether these are right
or not, but that most people seem to
be going with it or deno either blindly
believing it or blindly ignoring it. They're both
being ridiculous.
Now here is, that just one part of
this. In case you missed this, the Gazconos
part. We just talked about this on lies.
Right? So those are misinformation points. Well, here
is a major one that got called out,
the Gaziano story, which up until even right
now, by the way, there are still people
acting like that wasn't wrong.
That's funny. Miss Musk, you said on x
that an example of the fraud,
that you have cited
was $50,000,000
of condoms was sent to Gaza.
But And by the way, the first major
well viral story was a lie.
Just think about that. And Trump stood up
like Biden did with beheaded babies and rattled
off the story, even connected it to the
Gaza, the condoms making bomb story,
which shows you that it came from some
kind of Israeli, you know, what like, clearly,
that got dumped in front of them, and
it was lived to TikTok, I think, who
put it together, ask why. And they just
saw it, shared it, ran with it, never
checked it, or knew they were lying.
After fact check this,
apparently, Gaza in Mozambique, and the program was
to protect them against HIV.
So can you correct the statements? It wasn't
sent to Hamas, actually. It was sent to
Mozambique, which makes sense why condoms was sent
there. Yeah. And how can we make sure
that all the state Trump scoffs and turns
his head. When I'd cover this first, I
proved that he was doing the same thing.
Under his past administration, he was funding HIV
and tuberculosis treatment all over Africa
in the same exact way. And I say
it right there. That's it's just it's just
ridiculous, guys. This is absurd. If it matters,
it should matter. Just because you think the
response you tend to get is, can't we
all just be happy it's going away? Well,
yeah. I am already. I said that to
begin with. But you should also be able
to acknowledge that both of them are responsible
or all of them are responsible. But nope.
Only you know, it's it's it's a willful,
ignorant situation because it makes them feel like
suddenly maybe they're not completely winning everything.
Watch what no thing. But if last minute
Trust what you say. Well, first of all,
some of the things that I say will
be incorrect. And No. No. You were wrong.
You lied, and I can prove it. The
timing, everything. And then they lied again is
the point and how it went forward.
Turns out he's wrong, and he go, we're
a cycle. Then
it's not what you do. It really is.
Please You know, I'm trying to all of
your ads. So here is Trump saying the
same thing. He very publicly says I think
it's right here.
In that process, we identified and stopped
$50,000,000
being sent to Gaza
to buy
condoms
for Hamas.
Fifty million.
And you know what's happened to them? They've
used them as a method of making bombs.
See, this is so this is such an
important,
and it it says so many things. So
is he being used like Biden was used?
You know how embarrassing that must be for
him? Do you think he cares? If he
doesn't care, then there then there's a game
there's an agenda through this. But if he
was played, that means Elon Musk and whoever
else involved played him.
And and no one says a word about
it. Maybe we should reflect on who the
power structure may actually be. But I think
what's important here is that he very clearly
sells the lie. So if the point is
it was Mozambique, and what I'll show you
next is it wasn't even condoms. It was
STD prevention, and it could include some parts
for condoms, but the point was the amount
they're claiming was all condoms was the lie
itself. That was proven in a in a
follow-up investigation.
And he made that claim because Libs and
TikTok and whoever else, that was the one
I originally saw making the case that Elon
shared, showing some Times of Israel article about
condoms being used for bombs, which is probably
false for all we know. More propaganda from
Israel. But even if it's not, they then
just go, here's a thing for Gaza.
It doesn't say condoms. Well, let's just pretend
it is. Let's make it I mean, how
else does that come together? I mean, somebody
lied to somebody and it just and then
here he is telling the world. Oh, so
where did that part come? He wouldn't have
the grant, and you can look at it
for yourself. And they still lied about it
while that fact check was public, by the
way. I remember that. So that means they
gave her that story. They and that's her
rolling it out. Remember, she was the first
one to punch that out. Now here she
is pushing out more things. All you should
be doing is wondering whether those are all
those are you know, whether she was also
misinformed about those. Because I highly doubt she's
the one concocting these lies. But this was
the important part as well. In this follow-up
investigation,
in 2023,
For the most recent year available, they spent
only $7,000,000
for condoms that were distributed for USAID for
the global conversation. But let's pretend 50,000,000 was
for one location and one shipment.
Easy to manipulate people today.
So going forward on this.
Oh, wait. Was this the same one?
Oh, yeah. That's just the same story.
I'll include this for you so you can
check that out as well. I wanna also
highlight what Bitchute said recently, and this is
going continuing on the Doge part, right, with
the website. Is Bitchute simply said, it seems
you posted a few times to Doge website
after we called you out for it, because
they did, saying there was basically just an
empty page. Because, guys, the point is most
of the people that are supporting them, they're
not even checking this stuff.
The website they have up,
they're they're just listening to what Elon posts
and says on Twitter. That seems to be
very, very pretty obvious to me. And so
they're going, what because it's an empty page.
That's That's what, like, four zero four media
made a big joke about. They're like, this
is they somebody already hacked the website. It
was like, this is the dumbest website. It's
not even real. It's just a bunch of
blank pages and and links to tweets.
And so Beatschute called them out. And then
as they added a few things the next
day. Very clear.
And the point was, they were basically calling
out the whole dynamic. And I said, Bitchute,
an actual free speech platform continue to show
why Elon is a fraud. And then I
tagged their this tweet where they showed you
what the website looked like. Just just a
blank thing with a thing in the middle.
That's crazy. Then Max Headroom
says this is what it says currently. Receipts
are coming soon. No later than Valentine's Day.
Oops.
I guess we missed that mark. Right? Then,
oh, wait a minute. Now they changed it.
Now that's what you see today.
That funny? So no later than Valentine's Day,
which by the way was already extended out
from the last one. So I'm not saying
they might not they won't eventually get I
I can guarantee you there's receipts for some
of these things. Like, if I mean, I
shouldn't say that. I mean, it's certainly possible
they're literally doing nothing and just lying about
it. But just my gut would tell me
they're gonna do something. They're gonna give you
something to be able to look at and
hold up to people that are trying to
show you you're being misled. But it's crazy
to me that that's not already happening. Receipts
are coming over the weekend. It's Monday, guys.
It's just not we're past that point. Okay?
It's already not there. It's just so stupid
to me that this shouldn't be a that
this is not a huge red flag to
the very people who are pointing to this
website. Like the guy that we're just talking
to. I think he came here and was
like, what?
And that means he believed it was there
because I guess he just trusted that or
someone told him that, but it's not. Now
here's the actual site for the this is
savings.
You showed me where you're getting anything other
than tweets in here. Now just like, this
is a good example. Okay?
Can you click on this?
Well, that's stupid.
There you go.
Okay. So here's a good example of something.
Now I made the same point with Twitter
files. And I think the important thing to
recognize here, like I just said, is there's
going to be things they're clearly doing. I
argue we already saw examples of that where
they shut down a bunch of DEI things,
good, and sent us that money to Israel.
That was pretty obvious. The exact amount more
than once.
But my point would be that if they
do stare at the screenshots, you still should
not go, that's the proof. That's just a
screenshot.
They've already been caught lying about screenshots more
than once.
So it's simply a Twitter files dynamic. And
I should just do that. Nah, it doesn't
matter because I'm not I won't look into
it more. But the point is clearly, they're
showing something for savings. What does it say?
US USDA contract for environmental compliance services.
Same kind of stuff is currently going on
through the government. They're just not pointing to
it. I just showed it in the other
show.
But my point is,
it's just a screenshot.
They could post something that they that you
could verify for yourself because all of these
are public things. USAID and all the rest
of it, these are they're not cutting some
like, if it was some secret backdoor thing,
they would have nothing to show you. These
are contracts that are publicly posted that they
could prove to you they're not. Now I
think it's because even if this is real,
they want you to trust what they allude
to.
Clearly, that was Twitter files. Okay?
So if you look, you're gonna get nothing
but screenshots and statements. Oh, look. In here,
they're even quoting loads of TikTok. Who's already
been wrong? I I mean, it's this is
just insane to me. It really is.
Now here's one that someone was just trying
to show me,
and this is about the next part we're
gonna get to.
But
scroll through for yourself.
You tell me where this is being verified.
That's where it's supposed to be verified.
Where was it?
Right? But it's not.
Wait, that's weird.
Did they just change this?
Did you see that?
I wish I wouldn't have refreshed that. Okay.
Did you okay. Look. Where I was just
showing you a page
that had the the the feed. Let me
see if it's the main okay. There it
is. Okay. Making just making sure nothing changed.
So the feed apparently is clicking on this
as the home. There's no home button. That's
what I thought. And then savings is where
they're supposed to show you the proof,
and it's not there.
Must wait and see, I guess. But right
now, this is where the point applies. If
you're blindly pretending this stuff is real, even
if it turns out to be, you're still
the fool.
Now lives of TikTok, exactly the point. Breaking.
Doge near recovers nearly $2,000,000,000
misplaced
by Biden's HUD.
How do you misplace $1,900,000?
And I made the same point. This was
February 15. I said, I'd love to see
the source material, Libs. Can you post it
below? Because we all know you wouldn't just
blindly assume and take Elon's word and then
double down without knowing for sure and share
it out as fact. Only liars and grifters
do such things, as I'm sure we all
agree.
She never responded, of course. This this automated
thing
says, here basically, it gets a link, which,
by the way, went to a 404. I'm
not sure why. That person says, no. It's
not there. And he goes, here you go.
But shows a link. Here's the link.
$1,900,000,000
mystery solved.
But it says, allegedly
misplaced by Biden, DOGE finds and recovers lost
money. Okay. Not source material. There's it's just
reporting what DOGE claimed. That's why it says
allegedly.
But if you read it and actually go
through the entire all the data points of
even what they're alluding to,
there's literally no way you could argue that
it's I mean,
how the evidence that this is somehow Biden's
administration versus just money like, here's the point
they're making in this. Now, again, my mindset
is all of them are doing this all
the time. They're all corrupt. Biden was spectacularly
corrupt, and what they're doing now, I think,
proves in my mind that they're all corrupt.
But it says
where was that? I thought I had eyelid.
Department of the Doge
on Friday that it recovered $1,900,000.
It says the funds originally allocated to the
Department of Housing and Urban Development, the HUD,
which Catherine Austin Fitts has insight into, had
been earmarked for financial services administration, but were
no longer needed.
Okay. Interesting.
So it begins to sound like maybe not
some big bombastic hiding story, but something that
was earmarked for something that then went away
and in the changing of transitions that just
hasn't been dealt with yet.
Or it's all corrupt and they're stealing money.
The point is the fact that everybody is
just grabbing on to what people that have
already been caught lying or claiming,
it's sad to me.
Definitely not journalism.
And it says, the funds originally allocated, it's
yeah. It says has been earmarked for financial
administration, but they were no longer needed due
to procedural inefficiencies.
It says 1,900,000,000.0
of HUD money was just recovered after being
misplaced during the Biden administration due to broken
process.
So point is,
you could argue that they were doing that
to steal the money, which would not shock
me in the slightest. But why would they
put it on record
and then
take it to make a money trail of
taking that money? Maybe the dumbest criminals in
the world or maybe it really was just
a broken process. I'm not claiming either. You
shouldn't claim you know either. It says these
funds were earmarked for his administration of financial
services, but were no longer needed. That's Doge's
own tweet.
It says the secretary Scott Turner from from
HUD worked alongside Doge to rectify the issue,
leading to the de obligation of the funds.
It it seems like a clerical error, quite
frankly, and the funds are there still. So
they didn't take the money.
Are you seeing how obvious this is? Which
have now been made available for other uses.
So the money was there the whole time?
What exactly are we claiming was going on?
I'm not again, just the money being there
could still be used in a dishonest purpose.
But think about how grandiose this has become
and people like Libs acting like that's the
story. How do you misplace it? Well, we
now know it wasn't at we know the
story. But you leave it ambiguous with no
source material and a dumb show shot of
Trump and and Elon will guess everybody just
assumes
everything.
Many people are still pretending this is USAID
for some reason even though that's not even
the same conversation.
But I said, nope. That article is just
pointing to their stated claims like all the
others. No source material proving those claims are
accurate or true at all. All while they've
been caught in spectacular lies numerous times already.
It's honestly alarming that so few seem to
recognize this. Now this person post this.
Making my point, I guess.
Here's the Doge post two screenshots. Now this
is more than just text. Right?
But if you look at this, it's actually
kinda crazy to me. Like, have fun trying
to suss out this very fuzzy image, by
the way. But if you really look, there
is nothing in here. It says like, it's
all ambiguous.
Like, first of all, I can't even read
most of this stuff.
And if you're looking very closely, you get
a a huge amount of money, $751,000,000.
I see a tax ID blocked out, single
family master sub
servicer
is what it says. I don't even know
how that applies to what they're claiming. Is
this h u d? I mean, it says
the purpose of this modification is to, I
can't read it, obligate maybe, a a total
amount of $751,000,000.
What in this confirms anything they're talking about?
For all we know, this is something they
just did, and they're just giving you some
fuzzy screenshot. I'm not saying that's the case,
but this sure as hell does not prove
that. Let's go to the next one. It's
the same thing. The only difference is the
amount of money, $836,000,000.
But my point will be simple. First of
all, let's share a shot that's not basically
fuzzy to where you can't even read most
of the text, but also give us a
link to this, just some kind of real
time like, you could prove this if you
wanted to,
but they won't. That's my I argue they
will not.
But it's all the same. This one's a
little bit more clear down here. Period performance
goes to 2019. So clearly, Biden's administration. Right?
Date this is the date signed, 02/13/2025.
So that's clearly them engaging with this. But
am I crazy? I mean, what else do
you see in here? These are already this
is a b c. That's that's stated text
on the r on the form.
There's I don't see anything added to this
that gives you any insight into what they're
claiming, other than a number.
That doesn't have to mean it's false, but
it sure as hell doesn't prove what they're
saying. And I said, more screenshots with essentially
no identifiable info. You just got Twitter filed.
Now this person filed a lawsuit. I don't
know who this person is. Looks like a
senior fellow at the Brookings government.
The Brookings in the, Brookings what? Institute? Brookings
governance? Yeah. Brook and I guess it's a
spin off of the Brookings Institute,
which none of these people you should be
blindly trusting or anybody for that matter. He
simply says Musk is acting like he runs
the US government, and he is. But the
constitution does not allow an unelected super president.
It doesn't.
We're taking it we're taking him and those
to court to impose consequences.
It's just gonna discuss it on, I guess,
MSNBC.
Just because it's MSNBC and whatever else are
against their agenda, people are just going fake
or whatever. Now look, I I don't trust
any of these people, especially not Elon Musk
or anybody that you know, corporate media.
But is it true? Like, in the in
the in the general sense of, okay, is
he running it? Like, yes. He's very clearly
the one everyone's focusing on, and the one
being the the major moves are basically what
DOGE is doing.
And the constitution very clearly does not allow
for whatever this is it what's going on
right now. That's objective to anybody that truly
is being honest about the constitution or anything
else.
So somebody suing him because of those objective
facts very may have very well may have
another motive.
I would all I'd be willing to bet
you they probably do. It still does not
change what he's talking about. And so this
is how Elon responds. What are you trying
to hide, Norm?
Any of that money happen to reach your
pockets or your organizations? Well, guess what, Elon?
If you knew that, you could post it.
So I'm almost willing to bet you that
he knows for sure that's not the case.
Right?
He has access to basically everything at this
point. I'll show you the IRS point now.
I mean, guys, if you if there is
evidence through all this that he got money,
he would already know about it. But let's
just say he doesn't.
The kind of thing you're doing right there
is gaslighting.
It's
wildly dishonest because we don't know. Right? The
observer looking back is going, here's a lawsuit
based on things that I think are valid,
but maybe he's a dishonest person.
But your argument is just to elude with
nothing to back it up that he may
be a criminal?
Do you not see how wildly alarming that
is? This guy is the most influential person
on the planet, potentially the most wealthy, who
has more power than just about anyone we're
talking about, and is basically just jumping in
and going, you're I mean, that that could
potentially change this guy's life. You could argue
that is slander.
I I think it's just crazy. But either
way, I think what's happening is whether this
guy or not has a Democrat partisan agenda
against Musk, that this per that what he's
doing is problematic.
Whether it's because Israel's doing it or because
it's a technocratic overtaking, whatever you wanna talk
about, this is not in your interest in
my opinion. And so somebody tries to put
a stick in the spokes and he and
he immediately goes, are you a criminal?
Basically going, should we start destroying your life
by making this whole thing go forward? Keep
pushing. We'll do that. You know how easy
it is for him to make these things
spin out? Very provable lies.
The point where people are kicking this guy's
door down. Like, that's where we are right
now. These people are crazy.
And I'm talking about what I think is
a minority, but of partisan players on both
sides of the paradigm.
They're they're leaning into the crazies right now.
Now Solar Report, Catherine Austin Fitts adds an
interesting part to this. Question for Doge,
r e, the thrift savings plan.
Now by the way, before I even get
into this, there's few people in this con
first of all, this is her sentiment on
Twitter.
So do your research on this to come
to your conclusions about it. There's very few
people in this conversation that I would look
at this and
report on coming from something they stated. That's
That's not to say that I'm blindly assuming
this is true, but I'm saying is that
she is very immersed in this conversation and
that she is claiming the Thrift Savings Plan
is down to zero. And she says, question
for Doge, the Thrift Savings Plan, and I'll
show you what that is. The g fund
is reported as down to zero. And if
of anybody in this conversation, she's the person
that's keeping tabs on these things. 300 mil
$300,000,000,000
used in a few weeks. It's being borrowed,
or has it been stolen? Now I saw
this right before we were going live, and
I threw it in because I think that's
important. But question it. Don't blindly assume that's
the case. My point is that somebody like
this who's been following this stuff expensive extensively
and is very critical of both sides of
the paradigm
is suggesting that this fund specifically
for United States Civil Service Employees and retirees,
as well as members of the armed services,
members of the uniform services, so military.
So it's it's basically a a savings plan
for them.
7,000,000 participants. 4,100,000
are actively participating.
So you're taking money out of the pockets
of veterans apparently.
If that's the case, $300,000,000,000
now down to zero.
She says that being borrowed has been stolen.
Now, her and I just had a conversation
about this. My point has been about whether
it's the trillions of dollars that are claiming
need to be, you know, the whole treasury
overlap. That now they're saying you gotta put
this money back. And I'm going, well, what
if it never actually what if it wasn't
removed?
What if it was given to Israel, for
example, which makes perfect sense right now for
all sorts of things they're doing? What if
it was given to them or anybody else
for the execution of this global this globalist
technocratic technate they're building in Gaza?
You could think for yourself.
My point is that I don't think it's
there. And what if it's not? What happens
then? When people are going, you need to
put that back. And they're like, well, it's
gone.
Or nobody seems to care. I just think
it's very much worth considering. There's a lot
of stuff moving around that people aren't even
paying attention to because we're winning, apparently.
Now lastly, on this segment,
Doge IRS. Isn't it weird out? There's just
like, this is becoming your government, guys. There's
Doge everything now. Now you and, look, remember
the game on this? They they're supposed to
go away after so many it was, like,
80 whatever the number was.
And I read to you directly from the
agreement that that doesn't even have to be
sound. They can just continue, and there's no
obligation to stop.
Sounds like a coup to me, but it
says, Doge is seeking to help from from
the public. Please DM this account with in
insights on findings and fixing waste, fraud, and
abuse relating to the IRS,
which is just crazy. Like, this is mob
tactics.
Now or or in fact, you're gonna jump
to whatever you think is gonna be most
beneficial to whatever the agenda is. That's my
opinion. That was what they've been doing.
Pretending like some Ian Myles Chong's
incorrect statement is some DOGE investigation. Even though
I can show you within I think it
was fifteen minutes, it went from him sharing
that to Elon asking a question about it
to it being framed by Mario as some
ongoing DOGE investigation that didn't exist.
Because they don't care about the facts. It's
about a framing,
and it's provable.
In this case,
people are gonna dump things in his in
his lap that
I mean, who knows? The point is that
this is I mean, this is my point.
Simple. Get rid of the IRS.
That's the point. Get rid of the Fed.
Get rid of these
clearly broken sit, but that's not what they're
doing. They're gonna revamp them. Oh, you know
what's another word for that? Reimagine them. They're
gonna reimagine the whole thing, but let's let's
pretend like that wasn't what they were already
trying to do, and you guys push back
on it thirty seconds ago. But now Elon's
doing it, so it's okay. Well, here's what
this, Fortune article says.
Elon Musk's Doge wants access to the tax
information of every American, and Trump plans to
give it to him.
Now I know the people that wanna pretend
like there's no nothing to worry about because
this is the hero fight the deep state
that's saving free speech even though none of
that's obviously true.
It's just a person, guys. It's a single
individual that now has so much
the the consolidation of information, which is more
concerning to me than the the power at
this point. Do you know what they're doing
right now? They are training artificial intelligence programs.
They're being public about that. They were using
social media.
Now, apparently, they're using everything.
Your tax information. I mean, how do you
not see as an extension of whatever they're
doing? What their their digital twin dynamic or
whatever dangerous intelligence apparatus is working on this?
They now have access to just about every
single aspect of everyone's lives in this country.
But no big deal because he's fighting the
deep state. Right?
Well, my point about this is anybody with
that information and with somebody who we've already
seen has even gone after his own supporters
about, like, h one b visas for very,
very, very juvenile reasons,
What what would stop him from going after
and using this information against somebody like us
who are actively calling him out for his
crimes?
We'll have to wait and see, I guess.
Or maybe that's what's already been going on.
Maybe that's why we're already being manipulated. But
the point is he this is this whole
PayPal dynamic. I just showed you this yesterday.
Somebody shared a meme that says
your information. He's like, I own PayPal, dumbass.
It was a really stupid, lazy meme that
went around, and Elon shared it and said,
exactly, and laughed. Even though PayPal is not
everyone's information in the country and something you
agree to, very different, obviously,
as well as a very alarming problematic platform
that stole $6,000 from me and has continued
to be a problem in the country for
a very long time. And it's part of
the apparatus, the PayPal mafia. It's the guys
these people are the problem.
But the point is this has been a
continued narrative. So somebody makes a meme, and
now he's using that as his defense.
This person posts this thing. I wanna save
billions of your money and make your government
more efficient. Rummaging through your personal SHIT is
not that.
A party of chaos loses always. Possible Doge
access to private taxpayer data sparks outcry. It
should.
We don't want some twenty five year old
data some person that he hired with no
background that we can prove or anybody that's
actually accountable rummaging through. I mean, look. The
police, the FBI,
seven four seven,
what do they call it again? The the
FISA warrants
or anything else.
Every single time you give amount of power
to a group like that, it gets abused.
If it turns out that the police were
using their their predictive dynamics to spy on
their wives or you had FBI using warrants
to do the same or to spy on
people they didn't like, that has been coming
out everywhere,
left and right.
But don't worry because they must be okay.
That that that 25 year old that's screaming
on Twitter about eugenics is probably not gonna
I mean, come on, guys. That's insane. And
they're giving them access. It's already been proven.
They have write and read access even though
they lied about it.
I'm not saying it's happening. All I'm saying
is, historically,
this always happens. And we're talking about the
highest level of information that's supposed to be
private. The fact that they're even looking at
it is a violation of your privacy.
But I guess we're all crazy, screaming Democrats,
apparently. It's easy to dismiss the facts because
of partisan.
But he goes, bruh,
you're so cool, man. Bruh, if I wanted
some rummage through your random personal s h
I t, I could have done it with
PayPal.
Is that the case?
Did John Fetterman use PayPal?
Oh, here's what's funny about it, by the
way. John Fetterman is a moron who blinds
sports Israel like all of them do. This
to me is about trying to build this
narrative. But see, this is the point. Information
is not different because of the person that
points to it. The information is what matters.
But the point, did he have PayPal?
Otherwise, you wouldn't have his information. Are you
really trying to conflate the two things as
if you somehow have everyone's data just because
you ran PayPal? You sure have a lot,
and that doesn't make it any better. Your
argument is I've already abused that, so why
should I care about it now?
That's just stupid. The argument rests on the
idea that we're supposed to pretend that we
know you're not dishonest.
Having so so hopium and trust
of the government. How did we get there?
How did the the the the rebel fighting
team start trusting the government?
Having tens of millions of people marked as
Social Security as alive when they are definitely
dead is a problem. Yes. Obviously. But you
individually are not the person to be taking
this stuff on. There's been active the point
is, if you wanted to try to do
these things, you could manage all of this
from the Doge apparatus
while continuing to have the legal construct that
allows objective checks and balances and whatever else.
Even though those are broken constantly, the point
is right now, it's gotten worse, consolidated under
your belief that one man is honest.
That's just ridiculous.
Do you see how he could manage all
of this by keeping by hiring new people?
Hire new people into the same positions and
continue the same structure, but then and then
claim so why would that be any why
would how would that not be better?
Then you have the same groups, or you
could things like the IRS and the Fed,
which should go away anyway, which they claim
they want, but they're not doing. You could
manage this, but not be the one dictating
it all. To me, that shows there's something
much more alarming happening. You know, the guy
who's being completely puppeteered by Israel. Maybe that
should matter.
He goes, some of these people would have
been a lie before. So he just deviates
into some, look. They're lying. That means I'm
telling the truth. This is the same thing
they're doing everywhere. Now last on this before
we go to foreign policy,
Mario says, reveal. Senator Cotton tied to anti
Trump NGO
getting millions from USAID.
It's like, okay. Well, first of all, he's
the Republican overlap seems interesting to me, but
this is what the game is.
It's not about left or right. If you
don't understand that this is something beyond our
paradigm and I'm not talking about even, like,
the two party illusion. I'm talking about that
whoever's driving this bus clearly only cares about
a few things. But it says, he sits
on the board of International
Republican Institute,
a Republican group,
which reportedly received under $30,000,000 in taxpayer money
last year, much of it from USAID. Yeah.
That's a problem.
All of it's a problem. USAID shouldn't exist
in my opinion.
So just in case you misunderstand or pretend
that we're one-sided, that is the case. But
it's interesting to me that you're gonna make
this point about him,
even though they're still funding that group right
now.
See? Shouldn't that matter?
Shouldn't it matter that right this moment, they've
all they've continued the program? Now I wanna
make this point about this for all the
next ones we're gonna show you before we
finish.
This is the International Public Institute. Okay? This
is for USAID,
which as you hopefully know, did not go
away and still exist and Rubio is running
it.
Twenty twenty three. So under Biden, it started.
This is this activity, aims to prevent and
mitigate the effects of violence, repression,
and manipulation in Ugandan politics.
Right?
Woke woke stuff. Right? Which arguably I mean,
I get it's hard to the game of
woke has become so abstract. I mean, whether
this is about political
to me, this is regime change tactics. But
the game that you're helping fight repression, that
becomes woke. It's just it's so easy. They
give you one word, people jump at it.
The point
is in 2025,
'1 day before Trump took over, $300,000
was allowed. Right? Then in the thirtieth of
twenty twenty five.
So ten days after they took over, they
checked in as Rubio and the USAID and
their and their administration
and continued it.
So just to be clear, in case for
the podcast, you can't see it, but those
watching,
this happens constantly. This is an important part.
You'll see these where they say terminated.
When they say revision
and zero, that means they're continuing it. They're
just not allotting more funds at that moment.
Here's Biden in 2023 doing the same thing.
So if you're gonna pretend that that means
they ended it, then why'd they continue it
in 2024?
K? So Trump, in 2025,
continued it.
And that's where we are now. Okay? So
they're still doing it. And if they wanted
to end this program, they could have immediately
terminated it right there, and it would have
shown right there. On the thirtieth, they continued
the program. That's what that shows you.
Two the same thing.
Now, to me, that's seem other than USAID
in general, that seems like an inconsequential point
to the larger conversation. I should say, less
relevant than some of the others we're talking
about. So back to this. If we're all
up in arms about how this is happening
to Cotton, and right now they're doing the
same thing to that same group, and really
all it's saying is they sent money to
that group, and he happens to be the
board on the board.
So how are do we know he got
influenced by? You know why they're claiming that's
the case? Because they say the group actively
works against Trump's policies.
This guy and his his cotton blocking DOD
pick,
Tom Cotton and Trump agree on almost everything
in my opinion, especially when it comes to
Israel.
So to pretend that somehow that he's the
one because now he's holding up one pick
and you make this whole guys, the point
is the group got funded.
Yes. It could mean he gets some of
that, but that's not proven. This is the
kind of we are the media now flimsy
research you're getting, As well as the fact
that we're gonna ignore that it is still
operational right
now. But these things don't matter to we
are the media now. Now, here's the other
part.
Here is currently something for the purpose
to acquire information technology, IT services, to operate,
maintain, and provide continuous improvements for the
USAID
system.
Look at that.
Twenty
twenty, Donald Trump,
'20 '9 million
dollars. Donald Trump gave the obviously largest amount.
Actually, what? I like to see if there's
32 in 2022. So one the second largest.
$29,000,000
to continue the infrastructure,
the improvements,
and provide continuous improvements for USAID and USDA.
That's Donald Trump's administration. Okay? Going forward to
the next part,
it continues.
This is a very important part point, guys.
Because even look. Even under his administration,
you're gonna find the zeros, and this happens
on all of them.
They they it's funding action only. Now for
this continuation of support for USAID
in
February on February eleventh of this of this
month.
They didn't allow any more money, but they
continued the program and went with other administrative
action.
Means it's not stopping. So I'm gonna try
to keep up on this, but I'm sure
I'll lose it as we go forward. Keep
if you wanna keep track of this, the
link's here. Okay? Watch that. Watch for the
next payment. And if and when, which I
argue it will, they allot more money, which
is all I think almost guaranteed, then you'll
know, which you already should. Because Ruby already
told you, they're just gonna continue it for
their purposes.
My point is for those that may not
know that, they're continuing all of it.
He did then. He is now. K? This
one isn't more this one's actual funding. This
is USAID.
I've been showing you countless of these. These
are just a few that I grabbed today.
Started under Biden's administration,
and this is for the purpose of this
contract is to implement the USAID employee assistance
program. Well, there you go. Not only continuing
USAID, but and it say, okay. Get this.
You may even wanna call this WOKE. The
employee assistance program and other critical psychosocial support
service programs.
So Donald Trump's administration
is currently funding
critical psychosocial support services for USAID employees right
now to the tune of $300,000.
That was 01/31/2020
or ten eleven days after he was inaugurated.
There's no misunderstanding this, guys. That's the same
thing. In fact, funding things that you'd probably
freak out about if you claimed a d
was by their name.
USAID again started under Biden's administration. This is
for USAID in Madagascar.
Same point on this one.
February third,
they simply
administratively continued the program.
Watch.
Right?
Maybe maybe a month from now, they'll say
terminated. Maybe then it'll say good. They stopped
it. As of right now, they've made the
conscious joint. You realize they this this wouldn't
be posted.
It would be ended by 2024
if it was just no engagement. They've engaged
with it through Rubio and Trump, and they
are continuing the program
of USAID actions in Madagascar because probably for
regime change. That's what I think that's what
this is.
USAID started in Biden's administration.
USAID,
Burma offshore, senior conflict and government advisers for
Burma.
Same thing.
Jan
January 24,
other administrative action. Stepped in, continued the program.
This one, same thing, USAID.
Democracy and communications.
That's regime change. Support USAID Belarus.
Obviously, you know what this is, guys. That's
what Trump is continuing, and they've continued the
program.
Very important. Now those that wanna pretend like
it says zero, you're just making that as
something it's not. Well, okay. If that's the
case, then why wasn't it ended the last
three times Biden did it in 2023?
You all know this. It is extensions of
the program, and nothing has really changed in
my opinion.
And I showed you this about the 200
the 2,000 pound bombs that they just got
sent to Israel, and I said promises kept.
Nope. Obviously not, but no one's pointing to
it. I said, and this is, NYPLAD says,
I'd like to report a crime to Doge
State, Another one of these Doge accounts. It's
crazy.
Bombs delivered in the past two years to
Israel. New bombs delivered today as shown in
the quote post. Please explain how this is
efficient government spending.
It's a good question. Right? Thanks to tax
paying born tax paying born and raised in
The USA. Note, please deport to Jerusalem.
This is a joke he's making about the
Palestine dynamic. The point is that you could
see here, they've sent,
I mean, 70,000
tons of bombs dropped in Gaza
compared to Nazi Germany, twenty thousand tons over
a much longer period.
And you and we just sent, as Americans,
taxpayer dollars,
how much?
1,800
plus munitions.
2,000 pound bombs
to bomb children and women in tents.
That's murder. That's genocide.
Now all that aside, I'm sure you want
to disagree with that if you have a
side, is is that efficient spending?
Why is that efficient? Why would we be
one well, they're our ally. Well, well, so
so are a lot of people. Would you
be okay with them sending that money to
to to Britain?
No. So why is Israel different? Obviously, there's
something there that you don't wanna talk about.
The point is clearly, none of that's efficient.
If we're actually at the right side the
side that we all seem to be talking
about, then we shouldn't be spending money anywhere
else right now. Let's get our house in
order. Then why would that be efficient?
It's just an obvious caveat that no one
wants to point to. I think that's very
clear.
Now let's jump into
foreign policy,
which is obviously what that this is,
you know, the relation here, I think, is
important.
And where we're gonna get into to start
here is unless I let me see.
Right.
So a couple of things we're gonna get
into in regard to Rubio, Iran, and just
Zionism in general that I think is important.
From here,
Is the the person that we're gonna make
a point about here that is is this
little boy in a suit, Marco Rubio.
Oh, it's an honor to be back in
Israel, he says eighteen hours ago.
And
Rubio is now back in Israel.
But America First, guys.
So the first phone call and multiple trips,
have you gone to any other countries?
What's happening here? What I mean, this is
the secretary of defense. We have we have
the secretary of defense, Donald Trump, and apparently
the whatever you wanna call Elon Musk, who
have all been absolutely called and seem to
be on leashes for Netanyahu.
This is in this is alarming very clearly.
Here's what he had to say
or post it anyway. Thank you, mister prime
minister. It is an honor to be here
for the first time as the secretary of
state of The United States. There's been no
stronger ally for Israel in the White House
than president Trump. Gross. Gross. The whole thing,
the music, the whole production. Do you do
that for everybody? Do you make some weird
post about every leader you're seeing? What about
the leader what about the European what are
the leaders that you claim are your closest
allies other than Israel? Do you make a
flowery music video about meeting them for the
forty fifth time? No.
What's going on here? You know what's going
on here. To the people of this great
country
for whom we have tremendous love and respect,
a nation
stood from its very inception, from the very
day of its birth
against threats
from every angle and every corner. Or other
otherwise known as genociding an entire posh population
for your occupation colonial project and then pretending
like you're the victim. You know how that
goes. And has served as an example
to the world. If there were more Israel's
in The Middle East, more countries like that,
the world would be a safer and a
better place.
Just think about you you see, this is
what's so crazy to me. Either that he
is that controlled or he's that much a
part of the agenda.
Think about saying that to a world, to
a country that he knows
because you can see the way they respond
to this. He and listen to Netanyahu and
people like the ADL when they get caught
on video going, we have a real problem
right now. This is great. They know you
see it. So imagine a person who is
in a position of power they pretend was
well, I guess, appointed through somebody elected, which
I still don't agree with,
and stands up and says that. That we
would have a better world if we had
more governments like the one kinetic genocide in
multiple countries that you know we all know
about.
Think about what that shows you. I make
that point with all of them. This is
what we hope for the region and for
our planet.
Gross.
And he flew back Israel again.
How many times do you think he'll go
in the first year? Let's find out.
Well, Salvy Agris makes the obvious point in
general.
Every every rational person
knows this is not what self defense looks
like.
I there's just no way that you can
ever pretend as an honest person that that
is self defense, that that's targeted attacks like
the the new press secretary pretends that it
was all very targeted,
as well as all the other lies that
we can disprove.
That is ethnic cleansing. And now that they're
telling you that, we shouldn't even be debating
anymore. They're literally telling you that's what they're
doing. They're basically lying it out for you,
and now it all makes sense even though
it did because we were telling you in
the first place. You know, just like we
were telling you the COVID shots would hurt
you way in the beginning.
Hopefully, we can start recognize those things. Recognizing
those things.
Mencho sent shares something interesting, by the way.
Jordan's King Abdullah The Second says, quote, always
proud of my brothers in arms and their
sacrifice for the homeland.
Unfortunately,
we have people in our country who take
orders from outside.
That's pretty interesting. Here's the actual clip you
can watch for yourself.
It's right there.
It's right there. Or was it? I missed
it. Anyway, the point is well, it's it's
a four minute video. The point is, think
about that. Now, of course, it could mean
any number of people. Could be in The
US for all we know. But just think
about that statement with what's going on right
now. I think we know this is what's
going on. Whether The US or Israel, The
UK, or whatever we're talking about, that the
the we're the the world we see is
an illusion.
We need to start to come to terms
with that. Now, I'll include this card this
show we did about was Israel involved in
the Rwanda genocide. Quick answer, yes, without question.
It's obviously on the record. You can see
it in Wikipedia. You can write look it
up. The point though though is that not
as always doesn't mean it's provable, just means
mass adoption. But you can look at the
information from Times of Israel, Haaretz,
documents from the United Nations, and see that
they funded them from the beginning, during, and
after, weirdly, aligning themselves with Nazi Germany
during and after the final solution. Same thing.
Verifiable fact.
Again, on Wikipedia for crying out loud. Even
though somebody right now is going, you're racist.
For showing a fact? Apparently.
Well, the point is that you can look
into this conversation and see a very similar
overlapping point to this. This point here.
The Africa Afrikaners, Africaners, whatever they're calling themselves,
which is that they abuse
other
religious, ideological,
racial divisions.
Israel. They stoke these things. They abuse them
for their own interests
and cause genocides, like Bosnia, like Rwanda, like
many of them, like what's happening in Gaza.
Watch it for yourself. It's really hard to
deny.
The point to overlap this is in in
Rwanda, they very clearly did that. Oh, the
problem you're dealing with is the same thing
we're dealing with Palestinians. These gross subhuman people
that we wanna get rid of. Here we'll
work. Here's here's Uzis and and machetes. That's
what happened. It's very, very documented.
The point
is here's a post coming from somebody I'm
familiar with. They're simply highlighting this map that's
being shared by people supporting the Trump, Elon
Musk, South Africa conversation.
It says these maps
promoted by allies of Trump and Elon Musk
are not just part of a new settlement
project, which seems to be happening all over
the place. But it's like colonialism is now
the thing, apparently, even though we've all real
like, it's just crazy how these shifts have
happened. Like, you're talking about, like, with Greenland
and Canada, you're just seizing land. This is
imperialism.
Which what needs to be seen is this
is what it's always been. They're just taking
the mask off.
But he goes and she goes to say,
but also a component of a renewed colonial
scheme aimed at subordinating not only South Africa,
but the entire southern part of the continent,
both politically and economically. You know who has
an interest in doing that? Israel. But so
do a lot of people.
My point though is you can see an
interconnection between who seems to be guiding and
funding a lot of this. But realize this
is the same kind of thing we've been
talking about. This is for whether for destabilization
or simply to disrupt one of the most
obvious aspects of fighting against Israel.
The South African government was the one that
initiated the ICJ. That's they're the one I
mean, it's very clear. And now all of
a sudden, you got Musk and the rest
driving this internal dis I mean, it's that
doesn't mean that I guarantee this. You can
prove this was already ongoing. They're just simply
stoking these things like they're doing in Germany,
like they're doing all over the world. In
all these locations, there are very clear important
political interests for the people we're talking about.
Here's the actual post,
and it comes from this up top where
it's saying a handful of self proclaimed oppressed
Afrikaners proudly saying, die, stem, die. And it
says some of the signs they are holding
read, recognize the white nation. Self determination is
the way forward. We are the rightful owners.
Now it's interesting. Some of these things like
determination for anybody. I agree. But what's crazy
about it is you're talking about this. This
is not a new thing, guys. This stems
back to the original South apart apartheid South
Africa that Israel was immersed in, I think
responsible for.
And and since and because of the the
things have continued to be crazy because of
the and then you have to think about
it. If you if you create a situation
where you've allowed the white settlers to ultimately
control the African population in South Africa for
a very long time and treat them like
slaves, and then that changes like it should.
And then that causes the re the the
expected, which we shouldn't want or allow, but
the expected response to people that have been
oppressed their whole lives against the people that
are now, in a large way, not being
held accountable.
The point would be that's still Israel's fault
for doing that in the first place or
whoever was responsible, but neither should be allowed.
Whether this or violence against them or violence
in any context. But my point is is
not that conversation, but that all of this
is being abused and manipulated by the Musks
and the Netanyahu's and the Trumps of the
world.
So sadly, many great patriotic Afrikaners
so are their point being that there are
some people in this in this conversation who
aren't rabidly racist and and violent. And the
same thing we're seeing in this conversation.
It says some of whom they know, who
are truly committed to this country and do
not associate with these bigoted clowns. See, I
think we're seeing another co opted false movement.
That's what these people do. It's unfortunate that
these empty vessels shamely shamefully wield the bullhorn
to sow hate and division.
But this person responds saying, we this is
one of them apparently, saying, we want our
own territory, which we're responsible and govern ourselves.
Okay.
Then go do that. Why does it need
to be territory that people have already owned?
Like, this is the same extension. This is
like Israel saying they want Palestine because they
had the it's it's there's an origin point
here.
And so and this is why Trump has
now put an executive order out that claims
that they can settle in The United States.
Very real, by the way. Weird. None of
the immigration conversations spun out of control there.
I wonder why. Even though they're South African,
there's a lot of assimilation. It's going to
be the same problem you wanna pretend only
exist with brown people.
It'll be the same exact problem. They're different
culture. And it's a lot of people. Where
are they gonna settle? Whose land they're gonna
take?
It's it's just it's the same thing, but
only one of it matters very clearly, the
ones that that Israel wants you to care
about.
Look it up. It's easy to see. But
he's saying this in this area. This person
says where? I I must always refer to
the nineteen ninety five municipal elections.
All the so called white stronghold became ANC.
This, at the time, crushed any notion of
vols Volstat, which is what his, thing is.
It says, nonetheless,
Orania went ahead because it was the only
FF plus victory in the entire country. That
was just what she they're stating, not to
say it's so accurate. And this person's responding
by where he wants it. That's the only
point we're getting to.
Right stat then that's the the location we're
talking about, the Volstat.
Right in the center of South Africa.
It's okay. So
why would that be something they would allow?
Right? Well, it's it's because it's about colonialism.
It's about occupation. It's about territorial change.
This is not where we're supposed to be
in the world. And this in everywhere you
look is what these people are supporting.
That should be obviously why. I mean, it
should be obvious why.
Now to talk about Zionism for a minute
that I think is very important for why
this is all happening, it is a a
it is a settler colonialism project. They said
that themselves. That's why all this seems to
be continuing.
Here's Herets.
I said, read this and realize this is
from the leading Israeli newspaper, Herets.
It's time to wake up. Zionism
is not Judaism.
He said it says this government
claims that Israel this is on the seventeenth,
today.
This government claims that Israel is the only
safe place for Jews in the world,
riddled with antisemitism.
The sad irony is that, coming from this
Jewish platform, Israel has become the least safe
place for Jews because of its addiction to
occupation and oppression.
Well, look at that.
Yeah. It's true. It's obvious, guys. This is
the whole point. On top of the fact
that it's actually the least like I said,
it's the one of the most unsafe place
in the world, if not the, because of
what they do. Because they're using Judaism and
a lot of Jewish organizations are calling this
out.
But also, don't forget what I think it
was Sam Husseini said in in the press
briefing when, what do you know, Matt Miller
read the same statement. I wonder where that
came from.
And and Sam was outraged. I'm I was
outrageous. Are you are you now claiming that
Jews aren't safe in this country? And Matt
was like, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh,
oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh,
oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh
But it's at the point they don't even
think through these things. You're saying it because
you're told to.
But obviously that's not true. I mean, this
game they're playing is it's it's obviously a
lie. Even with Columbia and the rest of
it, guys, they manufactured this game. And they've
been caught doing it over and over. And
I'll show you one right now in a
second.
But this is important to understand.
Zionism
is not Judaism, and it's been calling out
it's being called out all around the world.
It's just very important to understand. It's been
for a very long time. People are just
finally starting to hear it.
Zionism is racism.
Israel cannot be both. Israel is either
a racist Jewish state or it's a democratic
state for everybody, and that's what I would
like Israel to be. I'd like
a democratic solution, one state with equal rights
for,
all its inhabitants.
Your organization,
Human Rights Watch, issued
a report last year,
about
Israel. Mhmm. And the conclusion was it is
an apartheid state.
And and there are four major
human rights groups in the last two years
who issued similar report,
which the same conclusion,
Israel is an apartheid state. So
apartheid
is racism.
Apartheid
is discrimination.
But
Israel is the only member
of the United Nations that I know
which is officially racist.
And I say this because of the,
July
2018
nation state law, which says
That's right. The Jews
have a unique
unique right to serve the termination
in Israel.
Unique means exclusive. Yes. It means Arabs have
no right to serve the termination. Mhmm. It
means even if Arabs became a majority Mhmm.
They would still have no right to serve
the termination. Mhmm. So most certainly,
Zionism
is a,
is a racist ideology, and it is largely
responsible
for the Anakba
that has unfolded throughout the last century and
continues today.
So that's Avi Islam. That is the a
or shleim, I think. It's it is a
highly respected
Israeli
British historian, a Jewish person himself
who I maybe I'll play that clip too
about Iraq, but, I should make move it
down first.
Here's a clip of him
talking about Iraqi Jews. This one's also very
important because it highlights a lie that people
like,
Elon Levy have been continuing to lie about
and leverage leverage against people.
I think it's this one. Did
not Iran. Yeah. This one here.
Iraqi Jews. Now just to set it up,
he's gonna tell you that Iraqi Jews were
manipulated
by Mossad
to force them out of the country under
the guise that they were being you know,
the whole the whole narrative they've continued to
use. The point is, it was the Mossad
intelligence entities that did the bombings that drove
them away. The narrative today is that they
were driven out because people hated Jews.
And it wasn't. It was the Zionist that
did it to them. That's what he's gonna
tell you. We're convinced
that Iraqi Jews
were convinced
that Israel
had a hand in uprooting them. After the
nineteen forty eight war, there was
mounting popular hostility
towards the Jews in Iraq. Five bombs exploded
in Jewish sites. The series of bombs
created a panic, which led more and more
Jews to register to leave the country. I
met an elderly friend of my mother's,
an Iraqi Jew called Yaakov
Khalkukli,
who had been in the Zionist underground.
One member of his group, Yosef Basri,
a very, very intelligent,
Jewish lawyer, and his assistant, Shalom Salah Shalom,
were responsible
for three
out of the five bombs.
Basri's controller
was an Israeli
intelligence
officer named
Max Bennett
who was based in Tehran.
It and, actually, what's crazy about this guy
is the history is actually not hard to
look up. There's documentation about a lot of
this stuff. The lies have just been stacked
on top of lies for so long.
Now here, one more clip I'll play for
you that goes back to the origin point
in the history of this.
And I think this is important as well
because, again, it's not hard to prove that
Herzl was an atheist, that he actually had
very negative thoughts about Jewish people, and that's
the origin point for all of this. Is
a political philosophy
which has brought about the state of Israel,
the so called state of Israel.
This this
political philosophy has nothing to do with religion.
On the contrary, it cease to confuse others
and let them think that Zionism and Judaism
is one and the same. I am a
conscious African.
I know properly my history. I know that
Africa gave Judaism to the world. I know
that the first Jews in the world were
Africans. Not only do I know this, but
I inform everyone who has doubts about it
to read a book by Sigmund Freud entitled
Moses and Monotheism as a beginning. Consequently, I
know that Judaism and Zionism are not the
same. Zionism had his first organizational expressions in
1897
in Basel, Switzerland in Europe.
Here was a man by the name of
Theodor Herzl, h e r z l. He
was the founder of Zionism.
He said that he was going to find
the state that God promised the Jews. Listen
to this very carefully. This man Herzl was
an atheist. He had believed that there was
no God. He said God did not exist.
Now how is it the man who believes
that God does not exist is going to
find a state that God promised to his
chosen people? I'm telling you, this man is
Satan in disguise. Zionism is a satanic movement.
It is devil. It is imperialism. It is
racist. It has gone and taken the lands
of the Palestinian people and through terrorism has
driven them out and through terrorism, it maintains
its power. And The United States Of America
with over 6,000,000 homeless census
Israel, Billions and billions and billions of dollars
everywhere to bomb Palestinian people while homeless are
here and unemployed are here. Zionism is going
to raise this war and make the people
in America become clear to what it is
and become anti Zionist and stop the aid
to Israel and use the money to take
care of the homeless in this country.
Now interesting how some of that is happening
now. Right? Whether we choose to use that
money for something. The point is that people
are becoming rapidly aware of exactly what he's
laying out right there, and the money still
flows. Last point. Well, I mean, certainly, the
Zionists have used it and brought it, in
fact, to the area. Terrorism as we know
it today, the planting of bombs in marketplaces
and so on and so forth, was, in
fact, introduced into the Middle East by the
Zionists in the twenties.
But the net result of of Zionist,
terrorism and and violence in the in the
first third of the twentieth century has brought
forth,
to my mind the the anomaly,
the horrific and
unacceptable status in the Middle East today of
the state of Israel, which is in fact
an armed garrison state, which now exports more
arms and distributes violence all around the world,
vastly disproportionate to its
size. I mean, in that respect, I think
it's a it's it's a horrible cycle of
of violence. But in it all, I think
the Palestinian is the victim. There's no question
about that.
Now I'll include this article we went we
went over. This was on the the show
on February 24. Zionism versus Nazism.
Just go into that history, which is very
clear. I've gone over many times. And Israel's
connection to extremist ideology, which is also very
obvious. And then even more than the rest,
ADL's ADL's history of faking Nazi marches. You'd
it'll blow you away how easy it is
to look that up. It's incredible. You have
major like, look up, specifically, I think, Chicago.
And I think it was,
was it spoke I forget that specifically Chicago
as well as just the idea of Mordecai
Levy. And you'll see a lot. That's just
one very clear example about how they got
caught. The ADL and somebody directly connected to
the ADL was caught pretending to be a
Nazi with a march that they were faking
through Chicago, and they got caught for it.
And it's happened more than once, guys, and
it was publicly covered. It's all right there,
but, of course, we're racist for even daring
to point that out.
Now here's a clip from another Jewish organization.
There are many around the world, and they're
not small. You have Jew Orthodox Jewish organizations
in Israel that get beat up by the
IDF all the time for protesting against Zionism.
How does that not show you exactly what
I'm talking about? Or the idea that they're
in Israel or I mean, excuse me, in
in in The United States and Britain. These
groups are all around the world. Or groups
like Jewish Voices for Peace that are currently
protesting Israel because of the genocide. You have
to understand how clear this is. That doesn't
mean that we're right. We could definitely be
wrong. But all it means is there is
not one opinion
on what Judaism or Zion people disagree.
And then if you just take a second
to look into the actual history and not
just narratives spun out by career liars, then
you'll be like, wow. How do I ever
think this was the case? Because Judaism
is not Zionism.
Here's a bunch of Orthodox Jews telling you
that. Netanyahu is in no way a Jewish
leader, they write. He does not represent American
Jews in any way. Zionism is diametrically opposed
to Judaism.
I agree. That doesn't mean that there's not
Jews
that fall into the Zionist beliefs or that
believe Zionism or don't care about any of
it and wanna have power. There is an
overlap. That's not to say that they're like,
with Christian Zionism, the same point. That should
never mean Christians are immediately a problem or
Jews are immediately a problem. That is the
game they play. Don't fall for it. And
I mean, even if you think it's 99%,
it is still a bad thing to assume
because it's not everybody.
But, of course, I'm I think I've proven
many times over the years that's not even
remotely the case.
Dan Cohen writes this very well. He says
Israel is a brand name for an entity
that has no internationally recognized borders.
That's actually very crazy to think about. It's
very true. Because they're they're all disputed. Their
current border with Lebanon has been disputed for
a very long time. Their border with Syria
is disputed. Their border with Egypt. Their border
with I mean, it's crazy
because they're a colonial project that continues to
take territory. Pretty damn obvious to see at
this point.
Always, I think.
And it says, and has been in a
constant state of war since before its founding.
Sounds kinda similar to
what The US has become since the founding
of Israel. Weird timing on that. And it
says the problem, it's it's Hamas. It probably
isn't Hamas, he says.
It's the he says the oh, I thought
I missed a part. Before it's found okay.
No. The problem isn't Hamas, the Palestinians, or
the Arabs in the region. The problem is
the ideology that animates every decision Israel makes,
Zionism.
And Dan's a Jewish person himself. He says
violent resistance, no matter how abhorrent people might
think it is, is a reaction to the
implementation
of the Zionist ideology.
Now, violent resistance, another way to say that,
is armed resistance.
Armed,
what's the other term they use? Rebellion.
All of which are are are legal terms
in the context of our of of the
Fort Geneva Convention and occupied territories. Meaning, you
have the right to armed rebellion, armed resistance.
I think rebellion is the one used more
often, but the point is that you have
the right to fight back. Whether or not
you were attacked in the first place. You're
illegally occupied. You have the right to fight
against that illegal occupation.
Makes sense. So the problem is
they show the person fighting against the illegal
occupation as the terrorist, and they have for
a very long time. So does The United
States. Again, wonder why they do the same
thing.
Viola and then it says, most observers believe
that Zionism sought to create a safe space
for Jews, and therefore believe it may have
been a reasonable movement at one point because
of persecution of Jews.
That is pure Zionist propaganda.
If that were the case, and he's a
great researcher,
why didn't the Zionist accept the Uganda plan
at the first Zionist convention? And there are
so many points like that. That it just
immediately undermine whatever they're claiming, and it just
doesn't matter because you're racist.
And it says the truth is that Zionists
needed the Holy Land in order to legitimize
their goal,
to transform Jews from a pacifist religious group
awaiting a supernatural mega event, like the idea
of the second coming,
into an anti religious European style nationalist movement
that used Judaism as a mythology.
Very, very well put.
His this transformation required the invention of a
completely new Hebrew culture, a modern Hebrew language,
a flag, and the conquest of land which
happened to be inhabited.
Now, again, that's why the star of David
is a Zionist
symbol.
The menorah, is the Jewish symbol. They've just
co opted all this stuff. That's why a
lot of Jews are very angry about that.
It had been for a very long time.
Only now in the last so many decades
has it started to really gain traction over
I mean, I would say in the beginning,
it did. You can go back in the
beginning and see that there's people in Israel
or whenever that was the time that were
on the side of Zionism going, you can't
treat the Palestinians like that. These are Jewish
people.
I'm I'm going to bet they got beat
up too. The point is, at the time,
there was clear resistance. I just think we've
been pushed away using their tactics. Like, I
think they're trying to initiate again right now.
Like, they're just gonna if they could just
keep dragging this out over the next fifty
years, maybe they can put this to bed
again. That's what they did last time. Don't
let
them. And it says that's why Israel has
been and still is constantly at war with
Palestinians, Jordanians, Egyptians, Syrians, and Lebanese.
The Palestinian resistance is not fighting against Israel
because Zionists claim to be Jews, which they'll
tell you everywhere you look.
They would fight any occupier no matter what
religion or nationality, which they've stated and in
fact done, whether it's The United States, be
it whatever it is.
The peace process is a farce and only
goes on because The US props up corrupt
regimes to be subservient to Israel with huge
amounts of money, like the Sudan point we
often make.
Ironically,
the peace process has radically radicalized Israeli society.
That's why they killed their own prime minister.
That way the way to make and that
that goes back to a Netanyahu point, by
the way, in the assassination that he was
absolutely a part of.
The way to make peace is to reject
Zionism
and the claim that Israel is a Jewish
state.
Once the ideology of Zionism, which inherently affords
Jews as falsely defined by the Israeli government,
supremacy is discarded, then Israelis and Palestinians can
make peace.
Don't let Zionists and their supporters gaslight you
with claims that criticizing Israel is anti Semitic.
It's the opposite. Israel's actions, while claiming to
be the state of the Jews, generate antisemitism.
How is that not the most clear part
of the story? Zionists need antisemitism
because it feeds Zionist propaganda
about needing a safe space.
I reiterate, he says,
to make peace, end Zionism.
It's that simple.
Couldn't agree more.
I mean, it's just wildly clear. And there's
every point you could make. He can go
on for the next twenty minutes telling you
about the the way they build the settlements
or, I mean, every single element of this
is sort of they're using this population.
That's why they fake Nazi marches and why
they fake all the anti Semitic things because
they need people to think that there's this
bill building blooming cloud of anti Semitism. Oops.
Turns out to be mostly Palestinian flags.
That's how that works.
Now, here is my interview with Dan recently.
I've had more than one with him, but
this is the Dan Cohen interview, the manufactured
Middle East plight, and the Zionism linchpin.
I showed this yesterday, but I wanna just
reiterate again, because it's important.
And, again, if you wanna take the time
to look at it, look it up. This
is actually very easy to to,
verify.
Einstein, according to Israel Exposed,
or just a letter which you can verify
for yourself, tried to warn the world about
Zionism,
and he writes Jewish terrorism, which is the
same thing in the in the context of
what he's pointing to in this article. Because
that and again, if you think that means
all Jewish people, then you're still missing the
point, in April 1948.
Now he's writing this to the American friends
of the fighters for the freedom of Israel.
Like, that's how long this has been influenced.
That's just crazy. And I said and this
is 1948. Dear sir, from Albert Einstein, When
a real and final catastrophe should befall us
in Palestine,
the first responsible for it would be the
British,
and the second responsible for it, the terrorists,
with a capital t, organizations
build up from our own ranks.
Speaking as a Jewish person, it says, I
am not willing to see anybody associated with
those misled and criminal people.
Sincerely yours, Albert Einstein.
Just things like this should matter. People that
were there. Right? It's just it's just I
think it's interesting.
Now, here is an example of one of
these fake events. And this is a I
mean, this is a real time example of
one that got caught.
Now, if this hadn't been caught, for all
you know, we'd be seeing Stefania scream about
it in some congressional hearing,
shaking her hands, shaking as she screams about
things we can all prove aren't true.
But it didn't, and this happens all the
time.
Day afternoon and Cairo takeaway cafe is buzzing
when a man wearing a star of David
cap walks in and orders a hibiscus tea.
He moves to the back of the cafe
wearing glasses with a camera. He turns them
on and he leaves following the female staff
member who served him. They're at the door
when the man in the cap speaks up.
The alleged conversation relayed to the cafe chef.
Am I upsetting you being here? And she
said, no. I'm just asking you what you
want. He says, because I'm Jewish.
Seconds later, a senior journalist from the Daily
Telegraph enters with her photographer
and allegedly asks the same female server, have
you got a problem with the man with
the white cap?
She says, why would I have a problem?
Eventually, they leave, the cafe worker not far
behind.
So my point is right there,
they were just gonna go ahead and work.
Beth, just move on. You would have never
known this happened had this person not confronted
them, filmed it, which probably, in a way,
could have spun out into the very thing
they wanted to accomplish had they got the
momentum behind it, in Australia especially.
But because he got this to somebody, they
were able to make a point about it.
And good on nine news for at least
pointing it out. They were trying to set
them up. Now the game the the mental
gymnastics these Zionists play, or I I would
argue maybe the ones that believe the lie
Zionists put out, is somehow that, well, we're
just trying to suss out the bad people.
It's just it's so transparent. The fact that
he walked in and nothing happened, and then
you just run up and ask that question.
Like, this is set up. That this is
dishonest. And I the game is they're trying
to initiate some kind of conflict based on
something that has nothing to do with the
fact that he's wearing that hat, just being
rude or whatever, which is what they continue
to do. And then they go, you hate
Jews, and then they make this big stink
about it. And clearly,
the the as always, who knows what these
people truly think in their minds? My point
is just being objective. Maybe. Sure. No. Who
knows? But nothing in the engagement showed anything
like that, and they just break it down
into something that can be used, and then
it gets spun around the world in corporate
media, and Stefania screams back in front of
congress even though she's wrong.
And she's now the one with the camera.
That is out and out.
Intimidation.
Who comes into a restaurant
and asks me a question about this gentleman
who I don't even know?
Do you think it's not intimidation that you
found it appalling that you think it's not?
And see, you you couldn't hear she tries
to keep going. Did you find it intimidating
that you found it appalling to
how do you know what she finds appalling?
You're just so clumsily, desperately trying to keep
the thing going that she's somehow appalled by
his white hat with the David star of
David on it. Understand that this has been
fleshed out. You can there's articles about it.
There there was no real engagement.
So how would she know he was about
because that was the game.
Show me that you're from the Daily Telegraph.
Easy. I don't know. I think something's upsetting.
See? See? You're getting upset. Why are you
angry? Is it is it because I'm a
Jew? It's like, are you kidding me? So
she's I still show you. She's from the
Daily Telegraph. This is what they do. All
part of a stunt planned by The Daily
Telegraph
allegedly called undercover operation.
A leaked planning document reads, meet Gussie at
Holt Street. Call on arrival at 9AM.
Undercover Jewish man Ophir Birenbaum sees what it's
like being Jewish in Sydney.
That is what they're doing. Now, honestly, there
are people
that truly have bought into the lie and
think that that, like, that they they just
know it's just bubbling under the surface, and
they're just not being honest about it. It's
like yeah. So so no evidence of what
you mean. Just assumption is what they're running
with.
It's not what's happening. We as a small
community restaurant accept everyone into our restaurant
and our venue and respect all walks of
life. Ophir Birenbaum is a prominent member of
Sydney's Jewish community.
Ah, okay. Now it all seems to come
together. This guy walking around with a gigantic
star David flag just hoping somebody makes a
big stink about it. This this is provocation.
He's a provocateur. That's what these people do.
And that's not a Jew that he may
be a Jew, but that's not Jewish thing.
That is a Zionist thing that he's doing.
That's the main
point. Is a prominent member of Sydney's Jewish
community. During the recent antisemitic attacks, he pushed
for unity. We have to respect each other.
People can disagree respectfully.
None you Of course. Right? But then you
go and try to trap somebody you don't
even know because you wear a hat. Totally
as an honest person. That's them just trying
to front as the one looking for unity,
and it's all the bad Arabs doing all
Look it up for yourself, guys. This person
is involved with all sorts of manipulative things.
You saw one of them. There's really no
questioning that.
News understands the Daily Telegraph contacted
a Jewish organization
to help facilitate the story Mhmm. But they
declined.
The cafe owner called police, and after a
three day investigation, it was decided no crime
had been committed. Obviously. Late this afternoon, the
Daily Telegraph responded
saying they never intended to provoke an incident
and their approach could have been better handled.
Oh, yeah. And I Reached out to a
fear Birenbaum,
but he has not responded. Of course not.
At Newtown, Aaron Rams We just made a
simple mistake. We just assumed you hated Jews,
and we ran up and asked you if
it bothered you. Oops.
Our bad.
It's just it's just transparent, and we should
be laughing at how dumb like, they they
got caught, and that's their best response.
This happens every day.
Now here's an example of what happens every
day inside of either well, specifically, the West
Bank at this point. But in in whether
it was IDF rushing in because, you know,
Gaza was a different dynamic, a different animal
before this. Well, you know,
after 02/2006,
point is that there were still all sorts
of, I mean, horrendous things that would happen
every day. In this case, we're talking about
West Bank, which is now also being Gaza.
It's being cleansed. It's right now. They're arresting
people. They're tearing up roads. They're pulling down
homes. I'll show you at the end. And
not a peep from the people screaming about
human rights in the world. What you're gonna
see here is what happens every day to
people just trying to trying to enjoy their
wedding. Why? Because they don't want them to
enjoy their wedding. I mean, you really if
you don't understand by now, that's what this
is about because there's no arrests that were
made, nothing happened. They come in, they shoot
grenades, they shove the bride back, and they
go, sit us way here while we do
nothing, and and then they leave.
There's children. There's women.
There's children right there. The crowd is pointing
right at all those people.
This is what they deal with. For what?
Of course, what they're gonna do is they're
just like the people supporting the whole dynamic
we just discussed, they're gonna just assume
they're must've probably terrorists.
Oh, well, you're gonna assume that? Right? This
shows that you're the problem. And what we
have roundly continue to show is no. They
just do that because they hate them. I
mean, I've shown you endless videos of just
people praying,
where they just walk by and throw a
grenade, a flash grenade, or a smoke grenade.
Just and they just keep walking for no
reason. It's not hard to see how obvious
this is if you have eyes and you
care to look.
Now, BM points out something that is, again,
a story that is just as obvious as
the rest of it, but people just try
to ignore it.
This is the February 15. He goes, we're
gonna hear about many more cases like this.
An 80 year old man was forced to
serve as a human shield.
Explosives stripped around his neck.
Meanwhile, his wife was held hostage by IDF
terrorists.
After eight hours, they were told to leave
on foot. Few minutes later, they were shot
dead.
He covers this earlier.
Here's an article from Israeli media for those
that were trying to already pretend like this
was just a fake story or that we
ever just point to text on Twitter because
that would be stupid, wouldn't it? And we
wouldn't do that.
Exposure. Eight year old man, Palestinian, served as
a human shield with an explosive band tied
to his neck. Now even that, we would
just blindly accept it's just another media passport,
but it is a Israeli media platform that's
calling the thing out. So we should continue
to look forward. Right? And if you continue
to dig, you find this is a very
real story. Now what's interesting is and we're
gonna I'll show you more on this. In
we or going back even five months, the
Guardian already broke out about an and this
has been going on for as long as
you look back in Israeli society.
This is five months ago. Israeli forces in
Gaza used civilians as human shields against possible
booby traps.
Or there's the article we did back on
there's a show on November 9.
The open secret of Israeli use of human
shields. Here's a very obvious example of one
where this kid is tied to the front
of the truck. Or we saw the example
where the guy was tied to the front
of the jeep, where he melted his skin
on the hot summer day. All of these
have been roundly proven.
This is how they operate. Neighbor procedure, I'll
play that clip in a second, was what
it really was before. Then it became the
extension of that. Then it became the mosquito,
apparently, procedure which they've been using, and now
they just don't care, apparently.
Now here is nine seven two magazine, a
very well respected Israeli platform. Israeli soldiers use
an 80 year old Ghazan as a human
shield. They then killed him.
Read it for yourself.
Now here is
Dave McCamp from anti war, another very respected
platform that you should be following who breaks
this down for you in full detail.
This is one of the sickest stories I've
read, And and that says a lot considering
all the horrific stuff that I have to
cover.
So an Israeli a senior Israeli officer in
Gaza tied an explosive around the neck of
an 80 year old Palestinian
Palestinian man to force him to act as
a human shield, and the man and his
wife were later killed by Israeli soldiers. And
this was reported by an Israeli media outlet
called the hottest place in hell.
So this is an Israeli media from an
Israeli media report with Israeli sources. And this
report said that Israeli soldiers,
present at the scene said the incident occurred
in May 2024 in Gaza City's Zaytun neighborhood.
Israeli soldiers found the elderly couple in their
home
and they said that they could not evacuate
due to mobility issues. One of the soldiers
said, quote, they said they had nowhere to
run and that they couldn't evacuate to communist.
The man was walking with a cane.
So just make sure you understand. This is
like all the rest of them, Cause they
don't seem to care at this point that
they're being they're posting it on TikTok.
They have IDF sources.
I'll show you from her rats too, in
case you didn't think that was coming. They're
telling you we're doing this, that we did
this. Now whether they feel guilty and they're
admitting it or whatever else it is,
nine seventy two magazine has had multiple articles
citing IDF high level people explode, just telling
you all of this. Or whistleblowers, I've shown
you before, telling you they're murdering children and
civilians or doctors from The UK and The
United States and all around saying we watched
them assassinate doctors and snipe children in the
face. But I guess we're all just racist.
And they said they simply wouldn't be able
to walk all the way there, end quote.
So,
again the man has a cane and then
the Israeli soldiers separated the man from his
wife and they tied an explosive to him
threatening to blow his head off if he
tried to run away even though he had
a cane one of the soldiers said quote
they explained to him that if he did
something wrong or not as we wanted, the
person behind him would pull the rope and
his head would be severed from his body.
He walked around with us like that for
eight hours even though he was an 80
year old man and even though he couldn't
escape us, end quote. After eight hours of
checking for explosives, the man was returned to
his wife. Then Israeli soldiers ordered the elderly
couple to evacuate to the south on foot.
The report said the soldiers did not inform
other nearby battalions that the elderly couple was
headed south. And after only walking for 100
meters, they were shot and killed by Israeli
troops. Which happens, I mean, every time I've
talked about this stuff. We have the guy
in the in the gray shirt that was
a very, very well proven Israeli media covered
story where they tried to make this big
moment. We're here. We look at he was
helping the guy, and they gave him water.
So the IDF went out of their way
to frame a fake propaganda story of helping
Gazans because they know you don't like what
they're doing. They know what they're doing.
And then they stopped the video, and they
shot him twice in the back. And it
got covered by Israeli media as well as
local Palestinians,
as well as the older woman we saw,
where they were acting like they were helping
her on the ground. And then it turned
out that she was a she she had
you could see her wrist that were bound,
and then they took her right back after
that. They're just making these stories up because
they're probably being paid or, you know, driven
to by their same intelligence and gover Israeli
government apparatus, or they just chose to because
they're also disgusting. No matter how you spin
this, this is happening a lot. And I
mean, very provable examples, and here we are.
Trump's still standing 2,000 pound bombs.
I mean, again, just this barbarity, this cruelty.
This this is an elderly couple
over 80 years old,
and they say they couldn't evacuate to the
South because, of course, they're over 80 years
old. They're gonna walk through
they're gonna walk all that way.
And they send them on their way anyway
after using them as a as a human
shield under the threat of death, and then
they just get shot and killed, just murdered.
And this is a combination of of these
these horrific,
practices we've seen from the IDF in Gaza.
The human shields, this has become so, it
became so prevalent in Gaza that they had
a nickname for what they call these Palestinians.
They call this the mosquito procedure.
They call they refer to the Palestinian civilians
that they use as human shields that they
that they find in Gaza as mosquitoes.
They call them they refer to them as
a type of insect because that's how they
view Palestinians.
And they also they have another name for
Palestinians who they bring in to Gaza for
this specific purpose. They call them wasps.
So
they actually, in some cases, bring in Palestinians
in from prisons into Gaza to use as
human shields, literal human shields.
And then the other,
thing, you know, policy of the IDF in
Gaza is that in certain areas and, you
know, they call these no go zones. Anyone
who walked in, even if they're an unarmed
civilian, even if they're an old couple, one
of them is walking with a cane, they
get shot and killed. And this is this
is, just one of the again, just one
of the most horrific stories I've seen. And
you know all this. Right?
There's many examples of this where you've seen
them tell you that they I mean, in
in not just reporting in Israeli media, but
IEP members publicly talking about the kill zone
or the fact that they have killed by
accident
many people, including their own hostages who went
into those areas.
That's the essay. That's the story in regard
to, the BBC,
which I'll include if you wanna read it,
where it's a very transparent story. Hostage shot
by the IDF
after they held a big sign that says,
don't shoot us. We're hostages. And then they
got shot, and one of them escaped. Fifteen
minutes later, according to their reporting, he was
coaxed back out from around the corner, screaming,
I'm a Jew. I'm a hostage. Don't shoot
me. And they shot him twice. Both of
them.
How do you misunderstand stuff like this? I
say it every time. That's because they were
ordered to kill whoever. That that's these are
horrible people if that's what they're doing. Now
here's Horace. IDF officer used 80 year old
gazen as a human shield to inspect bodies.
It's right on the surface. You won't hear
Trump or Musk or any of the rest
of them say any of this even though
that immediately invalidates from a legal standpoint the
what that they're allowed to send weapons. But,
oh, that's right. Because Trump can do whatever
he wants because as long as you pretend
he's saving the country, laws don't matter anymore.
Cool.
The next one
is this the example I was telling you.
Here's Sarah Abdallah. Israel posted a photo of
the soldiers assisting this elderly man. After it
was over, they shot him in the back.
Now here is an Israeli article telling you
that, or rather this is I'm sorry. That's
the wrong one. I have the other one
I'll show you next, but this is an
Instagram post she's can can including.
What we did see, and we covered this
oh, that does give you the the media.
We we covered this at the time directly
from Israeli media as well as many other
bow overviews.
The reality is you can see,
the demand was shot in the back. This
was posted and spread directly from the ground,
verified to be with the person in this
video. You could see the man, and you
could see his face, you could see the
shirt, and you could see them on the
ground right after this. Time and everything. They
just don't care. It's all right there for
you if you wanna check it out for
yourself. This was just an after point, so
take the time to research it. Don't take
my word for it. It's all out there.
And I'll include this show November November ninth
of the open secret of human shields. And
it wasn't just the mosquito procedure as you
remember, if you've already seen it. That's the
new name. Before, it was something else, then
they changed it to neighbor procedure, which also
continue to be a problem. Now they're just
the point is no matter how many times
it gets seen, they just keep doing it.
2,013,
Palestinian
children tortured,
used as shields by Israel, per the United
Nations.
Reuters.
Israeli soldiers who use Palestinian boy, a nine
year old, as human shields avoid jail.
Defense for children international, an international human rights
group. Israel forces use five Palestinian children as
human shields. That's 2023.
Two this is from 02/2017.
Generally, human shields. Since the beginning of the
occupation in 1967,
Israeli security forces have repeatedly
used Palestinians in the West Bank and the
Gaza Strip as human shields. Israeli soldiers
routinely used Palestinian civilians as human shields by
forcing them to carry out life threatening tasks.
It was also following a high court petition
against this practice,
which was filed by human rights organizations
around the world in May 2002 that the
IDF issued a general order
prohibiting the use of Palestinians as a means
of human shield against gunfire or attacks by
the Palestinian side. But then it goes on
to say, following the order, the use of
human shields dropped sharply.
However, the arms the army did not construe
as a human shield the use of Palestinians,
provided they consented.
The army continued the widespread use of this
practice, which they referred to as the neighbor
procedure.
Following another petition filed by human rights organizations,
the high court of justice ruled that this
practice too violated international humanitarian law and that
this thus was illegal. And guess what they've
never stopped doing? Here is the Institute for
Middle East Understanding, the neighbor procedure, Israel's use
of Palestinian human shields from 02/2012,
Human Rights Watch. During military operations, Israeli soldiers
routinely coerced Palestinian civilians, including children, to perform
life endangering acts that assisted military operations, the
practice known as the NAMER procedure. Now see
this?
Now that close from the show that I
that I demonstrated for you, the link I'll
include.
Now realize the consent part of that is
just the way they keep the extension of
the game going. We've seen how they consent
to children in prison or anywhere or force
children to admit to crimes they weren't a
part of, which has all been documented even
by Israeli media.
Or the make the way they force them
to admit to crimes, we now can prove
they never actually happened in the beginning after
October 7.
Consent to them is we made them say
yes, is what we've continued to see. Now,
here's an example of Caitlin Johnstone showing what
Doctors Without Borders is highlighting.
On the February 12, Doctors Without Borders just
had access to the Indonesian hospital, one of
the many that we continue to show. They
were just completely ethnically cleansing in Northern Gaza
after the ceasefire. And this is the testimony
of the emergency coordinator about Israel's techniques of
genocide,
deliberate destruction of lifesaving
machines to completely depopulate the area.
Okay? So is are doctors without borders Hamas?
Are they even trying to they don't even
care. That should be a big deal. They're
there on the ground. They can see it.
They're documenting it. This is Doctors Without Borders.
No group should be completely all good or
all, but you should just question everything. But
it's a group that has a lot of
respect and standing in the conversation.
The point is that they are telling you
they deliberately destroyed this. We can see it.
We're proving it, and it doesn't matter, apparently.
Caitlin simply says, what's the excuse for this
one, Israel apologists?
As if that's what we're doing is arguing
with Zionist online. Apparently, that's that I guess
that's where we are. No action's ever gonna
happen, but at least we can argue with
Zionists about it. Were were I'm joking, obviously.
Were Hamas hiding in the ventilators,
which is what they destroyed? Were the MRI
machines being used as human shields?
Was there a weapon stockpile in the defibrillator?
Was the incubator moving in ways that made
IDF troops feel unsafe? What's the narrative?
The point is there's no way around it.
They destroyed all of the things they need.
That it's not just the building. They deliberately
made sure that the machines they needed weren't
operational.
That is ethnic cleansing.
Now PBT also points out something we've already
covered,
citing nine seven two magazine.
IDF
confesses to gassing numerous hostages to death in
Gaza, which means both sides of the conversation.
They don't know where these things are, and
they're bombing and gassing anywhere.
They don't know where the Israeli hostages are.
Really think about that for a second.
Here's the actual article. Bombs the area, gassed
the tunnels. Israel's unbridled war on Gaza's underground,
which is where, as we've seen, many of
them were staying. That's why we now know
they've killed a lot of their own hostages,
per the Biba's father, who still says that,
or any of the rest of them that
continue to tell you they watched their own
people get killed by and even had Hamas
members cover them with their own bodies. Not
my story, directly from the mouth of the
Israeli detainees and hostages.
But this relates to a story we already
covered a while ago.
I'm and this is from September, but also
Israeli media on top of this. A hostage's
mother, so an Israeli detainee, because it was
actually an IDF member, says toxic gas from
the Israeli bombs killed her son.
And she's been proven correct as even I
think Times of Israel, one of the rest
covered after the fact, and we and they
were forced to admit it. So they're continuing
to do this, killing whoever's in front of
them. I think it's all by design. All
of these are wild war crimes.
I guess we just have to it's just
I don't even know what to say half
the time. He's like, well, here we are.
I guess none of it matters.
Every single thing you could possibly imagine to
the actual crime of genocide, and we're all
just going to debating with rabid Zionists.
Zachary Foster points out, ever wonder what a
genocide looks like on a graph?
A new study from The Lancet
has shown that the life expectancy of average
Palestinians has now gone from in in one
year,
from 75.5,
which is low for a global average anyway,
by the way,
to 40.6.
They have actively cut in half
the life expectancy of every Palestinian, and we're
gonna pretend like that's not obvious?
Most
moral army
in the the pinpoint targeting of only Hamas.
Yeah. That's what it looks like to flatten
an area, pinpoint targeting.
It's insane.
Now again,
promises kept sending
2,000 pound bombs after what we just showed
you to bomb women and children in tents.
But em Emily
Schroeder says
or oh, that's a different point. I've seen
her comments on it. Same thing. Thanking the
US government. Oh, you're here to support you
are murdering children. That's your legacy. Now Carrie
Burgess also points out something, a a clip
from somebody else highlighting what what you know
why I like this clip?
This guy clearly what I guess the impression
I get. He seems like he's in an
office building. It seems like he's
going through the research for himself, like on
his own time. And he's literally like almost
kind of hush in the middle in his
own office, breaking down Zionist propaganda. I think
it's it's, I like it. What's funny though,
is that it seems to me, well, not
funny, but just interesting.
Is it I think a lot of people
in the world right now are going, like,
what the f? This is crazy. Like, how
have I not seen this before?
And and you're and you're finding in the
citations in what we as I I keep
saying this all through this process. Before all
of this, even the US government and sometimes
even Israel, when a thing like this happened,
let's say Syria did something they claimed,
what did they tell you to look to?
Amnesty, Human Rights Watch, even the UN. Or
if they said what they wanted them to
say, what or, you know, just they generally
tell you to look to these institutions.
And then post October 7, it was like,
they're all fake news and racist, and it's
just every because that's because every one of
them are saying genocide. And they are right
now for sure.
My point is he looks into it, and
it's Amnesty International saying how they're controlling the
water of these children. And he goes, like,
what? My point is just this is one
small slice of how long and how horrible
this is for the people that live here.
Just again, if you just have the eyes
and you're willing to look, it is this
obvious.
About to blow your mind. See, I don't
care where you land on this issue, but
if you're a human being, like a fucking
human being. Oh, that's right. I'm sorry. And
there's he he says the f word many
times. So I forgot about that. So if
you're listening with kids, be prepared for that.
Earmuffs, there's cuss words in here. Alright. Hang
with me for one second. So as soon
as I heard that Israel cut off Palestine's
water, my first thought was who the fuck
cuts off water to millions of children and
civilians during a time of war? What kind
of a barbaric act is that? And my
second thought was, wait. Why the fuck does
Israel control Palestine's water? And a brief search
got me to this fucking article by Amnesty
International titled The Occupation of Water. Alright? Soon
after Israel occupied the West Bank, including East
Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli military
authorities consolidated complete power over all water resources
and water related infrastructure in the occupied Palestinian
territories, OPT. I know what you're thinking. Well,
they took over existing infrastructure, so build some
new ones. Israeli military order one fifty eight
stated that Palestinians could not construct any new
water installation without first obtaining a permit from
the Israeli army. Since then, the extraction of
water from any new source, the development of
any new one. Water. Fucking water. Infrastructure would
require permits from Israel, which are near impossible
to obtain. It gets fucking better. They are
unable to drill new water wells, install pumps
that are deep in existing wells in addition
to being denied access to the Jordan River.
Right? Israel even controls the collection of rainwater
throughout most of the West Bank, and rainwater
harvesting cisterns owned by Palestinian communities are often
destroyed by the Israeli army.
As a result, some 180 Palestinian communities in
rural areas in the occupied West Bank have
no access to running water. They don't have
access to running water, bro. What the fuck
is going on here? Because the resulting disparity
in access to water between Israelis and Palestinians
is truly staggering. Water consumption by Israelis is
at least four times that of Palestinians living
in the OPT. Palestinians consume an average of
73 liters of water per day per person,
which is well below the World Health Organization's
recommended daily minimum. Minimum, motherfucking minimum. In rural
areas, it's as low as 20 liters per
person per day. Wow. And how much water
do the Israeli drink? Sure. I'll tell you.
By contrast, an average Israeli consumes approximately 300
liters of water per day.
You see, we talk a lot about values,
but let me tell you something about American
values. If I took my fucking dog to
a restaurant right now, the server or the
owner on their own dime would bring out
a cup of water for a stranger's fucking
dog for a stranger's fucking dog. This isn't
during wartime. This is status quo. What kind
of an insidious
fucking sick fucking government will make it a
point to make sure
intentionally
that an entire population stays thirsty. People out
here talking about freedom, voting rights, passports,
airplanes. Can I get medical? Can I get
education? Fucking water. You intentionally deprive a large
group of people from having water. You are
dehydrating children
fucking intentionally. For years.
Who the fuck what is going on here?
That's why you gotta make shit up. Yep.
Palestinians. Right. To mask the insidious nature of
the way that you're treating them.
That's fucking disgusting.
This is status quo.
Water.
Damn it. I was forgetting. I don't wanna
stop it for that. But think about that,
guys. You know? And you know this. Most
of you probably know this for a long
time, even the rainwater collection, you know, or
the the permits that are hard to get.
Otherwise, not possible at all for Palestinians. It's
very easy to see all this. I mean,
I just I'm blanking on his neck. I
see his, Zachary Foster,
PhD, Palestinian history from Princeton, is very well
knowledgeable on this, and you've seen his work.
He's not so much to spout narratives inside.
He has direct source material for everything he's
pointing to, and it proves everything we're talking
about. That they have been doing this to
these people for a very long time. And
this was not post October 7, guys. They
have been controlling the water, everything from this
this area for I mean, look. Before 02/2006,
it was a different situation, but the same
kind of suppressive,
oppressive, manipulative tactics were already in place. Post
02/2006,
they just used this. And again, I don't
know why we believe that they would before
that, calling them terrorists allowed them to vote
for who they want and respect that. I'm
convinced that that very clear process was in
was setting up what we know was going
forward. The funding of that group in order
to pretend that they were the reason they
weren't allowing a two state solution. It's very
transparent, but I can't prove that they made
that election happen or, you know, however it
works. My point though is that going forward,
they did not stop occupying the territory despite
all the screaming Zionist claims from every single
legal standpoint, from telecommunications to water to food
to everything. They are occupied.
And that's what he's pointing out. And this
is one small example of all this, and
it just never stops.
This this is the entity committing a genocide
with your government support or rather alongside your
government, and now seemingly,
I believe, being completely controlled.
I think that's been happening a while, but
I think it's quite obvious right now. And
it's dangerous that we're ignoring this while focusing
on things that in some cases matter, but
are a fraction of the importance, especially when
it's designed for you to think you're taking
down so they can build the thing around
you.
Now Iran
is where this is going.
They are, if you don't remember by now
how obvious it is that Israel is driving
The United States to go to war with
Iran, even the point to where this guy
has to come out and lay out the
false pushback on it to make it sound
like we're worried about it, even though I
guarantee what I'm gonna say right here.
It's transparent.
Are we pretending that Trump and Vance aren't,
like, rapidly already telling you before this even
before the selection that they were gonna be
fighting Iran?
Trump did Alex Jones shares this. Or Israel
versus Iran. Netanyahu's next move could spark global
war. Is Trump being set up?
The globalists want war. You mean the people
you're supporting?
Duh.
I mean, it just kills me. And I'm,
you know, I don't I I always, in
case it doesn't seem that way when I'm
making fun of this guy, I ask myself
if I'm wrong. If I could be missing
something. But it's not that I my point
is like before, I don't think that it's
about one of us knowing the right thing.
It's that I can think I can prove
that neither of us do, and here he
is screaming what he wants you to think.
I have my opinion just like I'm sure
he does. But the idea that he's giving
you a part of it or the idea
that we're not pretending that the Israeli apparatus
and as they continue to march around to
grow their own territory and the technocratic overlap
and the new area in Gaza they're about
to build is not exactly
the globalist dynamic, the technocratic Zionist complete overtake
that we're watching.
But the tricons or whatever else, you know,
whatever the narrative is to look somewhere else,
sad.
The
North American Union is now freedom land for
Greenland that we're gonna stupidly call red, right,
and blue land. That's not a joke, by
the way. That's what they literally put in
the bill, if that happens.
But he says,
is he being set up?
Hey. Fair question. I think it's quite clear
that he's absolutely aware of what the plan
is and is on board with it. But
I said, you'll frame it however Elon and
Trump ultimately do. And I wrote untimely or
that's what it showed after I thought I
pretty sure wrote ultimately, but, you know, that's
just my crazy mind. I already edited it,
but the point is I wanna show you
this, so that's why it looks gray. You'll
frame it however Elon and Trump
ultimately
do. Mark my words. I said, even though
it's quite obvious that you know Israel's driving
The US to make war with Iran, that's
not a question. They're telling you that. Even
Horetz blatantly stated that, which I'll show you
in a second. But again, you'll float the
doubt like you're doing now, and then double
down on whatever Trump and Elon say. Watch.
Now what's interesting is,
sir Braden Circus points out, they can't claim
Trump doesn't know.
You've seen this clip. Remember, if you remember,
and I hope you do, what did I
say at the time? Trump shares this,
right, with no commentary, and it's a post
from Wall Street Apes, which is this, from
Twitter.
See, See, that's the little extra stuff that
we do for you guys that nobody does.
You so most people would've just shown this.
Right? But we take the time to search
for that on Truth Social then to find
the content of this and find it on
Twitter so you can check it out for
yourself. Yes. I'm patting myself. I want I
want you guys to see the work that
we put into this because it's important to
have that information. The point is Wall Street
Apes shares a good point. Jeffrey Sachs goes
into more detail about how Barack Obama commanded
the CIA to overthrow Syrian government and American
media covered for him. Now true. A %.
But the point is it wasn't unique. It
was it was a bipartisan agenda that strand
all the way to this point.
Because right now, they're supporting the very terrorists
they were funding in Syria, Trump included,
especially Israel. But it says he says reporters
are lying through their teeth, and the main
point is he's calling out Netanyahu.
In this clip, he's very, very seriously calling
out Netanyahu. Now
Trump shared it.
Right? And what was the assumption? He's gonna
go after Netanyahu. We knew it. It's okay.
All the other things are okay because, see,
he's gonna do it at some point. No.
It doesn't make all of the other genocidal
actions okay, but maybe maybe it does mean
that. I don't think it does. I think
it was meant to pacify you. So you
believed what he wanted you to lean into
without even putting a word on it. I'll
play the clip for you. Now why I
think he actually shared it was twofold, was
to get you to think that he really
secretly was gonna fight Netanyahu. They look at
the queue dynamic. You don't you need to
know that. They play you
guys.
On top of that,
I think it's because they he wanted to
sort of couch that resistance as only the
left
because that's what this ultimately kind of does.
It is not. And of all people, Jeffrey
Sachs knows that. Here's the clip. War in
Syria.
And you may actually hear
from grown up reporters
who are lying through their teeth or ignorant
beyond imagine
Like that one right there.
Oh, the war in Syria. Yes. Russia intervened
in Syria.
Well, do you know that the
that Obama
tasked the CIA to overthrow the Syrian government
starting four years before Russia intervened? Absolutely. What
kind of nonsense is that? Which I'm not
sure.
Did The New York Times report on operation
Timber Sycamore, which was the presidential
order to the CIA to overthrow Bashar al
Assad
three times in ten years.
This is not democracy.
Okay. This Don't miss that. Okay? See, that's
the part that gets missed. That goes well
beyond the left leaning
part of our government.
10 here. That is a bipartisan,
multiple administration
agenda leading right to this point to overthrow
Assad.
You just have to make sure you understand
that. Okay? That is the that is it's
always been that way. So if you try
to couch this at one side, it's a
it's a guarantee that we will not actually
change. If we really actually want change and
not just a dunk on your enemies,
then actually understand that you need to show
the whole picture or it will never stop.
Very simple. This is a game, and it's
a game of narrative.
Why did The US invade Iraq
in 02/2003?
Mhmm. Well, first of all, it was completely
phony
pretenses. It wasn't, oh, we were so wrong.
They didn't have weapons of mass destruction. That
was a problem. They actually did focus groups
in the February
to find out what would sell that war
to the American people. Mhmm.
Abe Scholzky, if you wanna know the name
of the PR genius.
They did focus groups
on the war.
They wanted the war
all the time. They had to figure out
how to sell the war to the American
people. We covered all this all the way
back then.
We covered all well, I I shouldn't say
at the time. I believe my point is
we've covered this content. Sometimes I remember exactly
when I was really beginning to get immersed
in this. It was after that. My point,
though, is that we've covered these con this
content and all these different points. Now it's
interesting. I'm not sure how I read Sachs
here. Like, I don't can't tell whether he's
one of these entities that are using things
that that a lot of us already know
to kinda build clout. But I it's hard
to say. I I I like a lot
of what he says lately. And so you
gotta you just got point is question everything.
Don't start trusting any. Just consider every data
point as data point. Find the source material
for yourself. Verify it. And then base your
opinion of them on their consistency of being
accurate and backing it up with source material.
But either way, my point is that it's
important to hear this now, but realize this
has been around this stuff has been around
for a long time. I mean, group people
like Daniel McAdams or Ron Paul or people
in the past or the, what's another one?
Like Scott Horton, for example. Plenty of people
have been saying these things for a very
long time and backing it up with source
material. To scare the shit out of the
American people.
It was a phony war. Yep. Where did
that war come from? You know what? It's
quite surprising. That war came from Netanyahu, actually.
Mhmm. You know that? It's weird.
And the way it is is that Netanyahu
had from 1995
onward the theory
that the only way we're gonna get rid
of Hamas and Hezbollah
is by toppling the governments that support them.
That's Iraq,
Syria, and Iran.
And the guy's nothing if not obsessive.
And where he's still trying to get us
to fight Iran this day, this week.
He's a deep dark son of a bitch,
sorry to tell you. Because he's gotten us
into endless wars
and because of
the power of all of this, in The
US politics,
he's gotten his way. But that war was
totally phony. So what is this democracy versus
dictatorship? Come on. This is these are not
even sensible terms.
Right.
Very important.
So the point he makes is you can't
claim Trump doesn't know. Right? So if Trump
shares that video,
I mean, you have to at least hope
he saw it. Right? I mean, that would
be pretty silly if he didn't, but who
knows? The point though is that you would
argue he saw it, so he knows the
information, which would mean why would he being
set up if he knows that's the point?
Right?
See, these people are just gaslighting. They're keeping
you in a very a position that allows
them to, at some point, pull that out
and make you continue to support whatever goes
on under the guise of giving pushback. That's
my opinion, obviously.
Now here's Netanyahu, again, all public, which standing
right next to Trump's secretary of defense, telling
you that he supports Trump,
that Trump will lead the way in going
after Iran. And this is being, excuse me,
this is being posted by Mario Nafal.
Right? So you have to understand how clearly
this all overlaps.
And America stand shoulder to shoulder encountering the
threat of Iran. We agreed that the I
told I told us must not have nuclear
weapons.
And we also agreed that Iran's aggression in
the region has to be rolled back.
I'd love an example. Right? They're gonna point
to Hamas, Hezbollah, and and the Houthis, which
are not Iran's aggression. In fact, all the
aggression around all of those things are due
to what Israel's currently doing in those locations.
That's verifiable.
Or the idea of the nuclear armed Iran,
are we still playing that game? I mean,
you realize that has been proven even by
the state department, even by the I the
International Atomic Energy Agency. They've both, over the
last year, publicly said they're not doing that.
It's unbelievably clear. And he's been telling you
that's gonna happen. We're thirty seconds away for,
like, fifth or I don't know. Probably 20.
It's really transparent
from his fake card Wile E. Coyote bomb,
you know, picture or the CDs on the
wall. It's embarrassing. And and in the time
with the CDs, it even got called out
as that's not even new. He just pulled
up some old data and made the case
because he wanted that back in the conversation.
That's what these people do, and your US
Presidents
lap it up or are doing it because
they're a part of it, or because they're
blackmailed, or whatever you wanna think. It's not
in your interest. It's not in America's interest.
It may be in the president's interest for
whatever reason, or maybe they're being manipulated. The
bottom line is they're lying to you.
Think about while they're destroying, while they just
gave a terrorist organization
control of Syria. They want you to think
Iran is the one to be worried about.
Iran's funding all the bad guys while the
ISIS group just attacked Iran.
Twice over the last, what, six months?
How dumb is all this?
Over the last sixteen months, Israel has dealt
a mighty blow to Iran's terror axis. Under
the strong leadership of president Trump and with
your unflinching support,
I have no doubt that we can and
will finish the job.
Crazy.
So I have a couple of examples here.
So the point there is obvious. They're going
after Iran. That's always been the plan. Vance
and Trump before he even got selected, were
already positioning. They're already calling out Iran. That's
a clear point.
But this was 2023,
November eighth.
Weird. Right after like, so the game is
I mean, obviously, Israel has never been attacked
by ISIS or Al Qaeda. They've been supporting
them the entire time. I mean, I I
has always I always want to go through
all this, but there's just it's information we've
covered so many times. Here's a report from
the Jerusalem Post. Israel treating
all Qaeda fighters. You know, the same group
currently running Syria or or an extension of
the same organization, Hayat Erl Sham, which was
just another change name from another change name
that is that's the same group that they've
always been supporting.
It's right on the surface.
The point here is that in 2023,
right after October 7, the group that's supposed
to be we're supposed to believe is the
focal point. Right? They all just hate Jews.
That's what it's all about. And we're stopping
the evil Muslim terrorists who are coming after
the West, and all they seem to do
is fight the enemies of Israel.
And I'd say and this this was the
story at the time. Here's the cradle, which,
of course, you can see is being suppressed.
That's Twitter for you.
Is ISIS conducts new attacks on army positions
in Central Syria. Right?
I said, just like that, ISIS suddenly starts
attacking the enemies of Israel and the US
government again, completely by coincidence, of course, as
as usual, after being a % defeated a
few times.
And I include this post from, you know,
the receipts, actual receipts, not like a fake
DOGE dynamic, actual receipts of the history and
the reality of The US and Israel funding
Al Qaeda. It's very easy to see.
Oh, I wanna include that for you.
And I was trying to quickly grab another
one in the background, but I don't wanna
waste time to try to find it real
quick, but we've covered this a lot. And
one of them was the point about
Iran being attacked.
Yeah. I don't wanna find it. It's gonna
take I hate having to wait and find
it. The point is that that we just
recently covered after that point. That was 2023,
'20 '20 '3, and then 2024.
There was an example where they were in
the in the heat of the argument and
and, you know, that is the back and
forth with Israel and Iran. Right? All of
a sudden, ISIS attacked Iran. And that was
the oh, that's what it was. Let's see
if this pops up. There was the ISIS
k overlap. I made a point about that
in the show. Remember that? And now it
just turns out that in the middle of
congressional discussions, they're going, you funded ISIS k.
Well, look at that. Right? It was right
again.
We'll start that meme. Of course, and, this
is the
it's not popping up for some reason.
Oh, there it is.
Let's see if it's the right one.
Yeah. I think this is the right one.
So this is the different so ISIS k
overlap with the with the, what's it called?
Crocus Hall in Russia conversation. But and the
point was we made we called this out.
We went through it in-depth.
I am of the belief that ISIS k
is not even an actual thing. Like, let's
realize, ISIS al Qaeda, there are people in
these groups. Some of which I think believe
in the in the ideology, but we even
Saudi Arabia has been in the past that
they basically don't believe these things. That they're
this is like a CIA operation kinda dynamic,
but they've convinced people below. You know, kinda
like the FBI does at home. Right?
And, ultimately, the ISIS k, though, I think
is a fabricated idea. It's it's a it's
a
it is an operation for intelligence. That's what
I believe. And it doesn't mean there's not
real people, but I'm beginning to think it's
just like a carve out that just use
when they carry out some kind of an
action. The guy they pointed to in the
Crocus City Hall was a white guy. I
mean, it just it doesn't doesn't mean it
couldn't be, but it just all these points,
it very clearly begins to show you something
else. I'll include this in case it's the
right one. Either either way, we talk about
Isis k in here.
But here's one of just,
Obama literally saying that we and we trained
ISIL forces. At the time, people tried to
pretend like it was fake. It wasn't because
they always been. That's the moderate rebels for
you. It's the same game, and it's bipartisan.
So here's Rubio. I mean, I feel like
I'm did I miss a point there I
was gonna make?
I can't I forget. I guess I gotta
show that article. But if the overarching point
is obviously they're they're positioning towards Iran and
pretending like they're the leading state sponsor of
terrorism while it's transparently
obvious that's not true.
Again, like I said before, even if you
wanna believe every claim they have made about
Iran, which would be primarily Houthis, Hezbollah, or,
you know, Hamas, and pretend that everything they've
ever done combined
was true,
that still pales in comparison to just what
we can prove Israel's done, let alone United
States.
I mean, think about how obvious it is,
the many different blunders they call
freedom, democracy operations.
Now what are they doing? Stealing resources, taking
territory, murdering people, putting terrorists in charge, pretty
much like they've been before. Well, here is
the kind of our at the same extension,
the same point. This says Iran is the
single greatest source of instability in the region.
This is Rubio just pushing but saying the
same thing Netanyahu is saying. If you don't
think this is where Trump's administration is going,
you're being blind. And is Iran is objectively
not the largest source of instability. That's ridiculous.
Even if you think they're what they claim,
you can still point at what the obvious
instability is, and you know what it is.
The common theme in all of these challenges
is Iran.
It is the single greatest source of instability
in the region. Wow. Behind every terrorist group,
behind every act of violence, behind every destabilizing
activity, behind everything that threatens peace and stability
for the millions of people who call this
home.
Everything.
Right? So when Israel just gassed children on
the ground, that's that's Iran's fault. Right? When
they got caught raping people and tortured friends,
that was Iran that did that. Or when
they have ethnically cleansed the entire part of
Gaza, they're fighting Hamas. Right? So they made
us do that. That's their fault.
I guess we're in kindergarten now.
Is Iran. And by Iran, I mean the
Ayatollahs. By Iran, I mean its regime. Yep.
See? A regime who, by the way,
is people don't support. Incorrect.
Actually, one of the easiest things to prove.
Yes. There's a clear deviation of the group
of people that don't support the current administration
or regime or whatever you wanna call
it, just like in this country. So if
we're gonna start making arguments about why how
many people don't support, well, there's peep like,
I remember this point they made about Venezuela
when Macron at the time called out Maduro
as some kind of un he shouldn't be
there because they showed the voter turnout and
they showed the support numbers. And then I
immediately went and proved at that exact moment,
Macron had lower numbers for both.
These people are ridiculous.
So the point would be, if we're gonna
start claiming that they don't support him, we
can prove a I think I think it's
quite obvious the majority does. But let's just
say it's 51%.
You have 50 49% of the country that
doesn't support him. Those people,
and I've made this point in the past,
I've done it on the show, would speak
they spoke they tell you, we don't want
this administration, but we do not want anybody
else stepping in because they remember what happened
in the last
occupation that they had to revolt against.
That was Israel and The United States and
the Shah. It was a horrible reality for
anybody other than their oligarch
community that was basically the people that allowed
that to happen.
So what he's trying to pretend is a
lie.
Who, by the way,
is people don't support
the people. And the last thing I was
gonna say was that in this by that
argument,
there's a at least half this country didn't
support Trump. So are we gonna pretend that
means that we should overthrow the country?
I think logic applies. If you're gonna make
a case that would apply any context, it
shows you they're hypocrites. Or, really, they're just
making up a narrative to go after them
when they're even lying about the facts. People
of Iran
are victims of that regime.
And so I think it's important to constantly
point that whether we talk about Hamas or
we talk about Hezbollah or we talk about
violence in the West Bank or we talk
about destabilism Violence in the West Bank. Are
you kidding me? So here, he just made
it he just made this easy. They're we're
they're not even pretending they're going after something
in the West Bank. They're going after Palestinians,
and they're making that clear.
This guy is a puppet. This little boy
in a suit is a bought off puppet.
In Syria, or we talk about any of
these issues, the militias in Iraq,
they all have behind them one common theme,
Iran. And that must be addressed.
And there can never be a came at
the PMU and these other groups, right, that
are not nuclear Iran. A
nuclear
Iran that could then hold itself
immune
from pressure. Oh, you mean like the rest
of you do with your threats of nuclear
weapons? That's all they're really talking about. They
don't want like, North Korea gained that ability,
and now we don't hear about it anymore.
Funny how that works. Right? I'm not saying
we should support it. The point is if
you're going to allow some dynamic where countries
that are that are sovereign are allowed certain
things, you don't just get to dictate ones
don't because we don't like them.
You're you're the you're the bully. Right? And
that shows weakness like Trump just told you.
It's obvious what's happening. An Iran nuclear they're
they're just going back to the same old
rhetoric.
It's pretty sad. Now let's not
forget
that here's the state department. That's that's Rubio
saying there's not going to be peace in
The Middle East until a group like Hamas
visit with you know, Hamas goes away, basically.
Right? They can't control power. His point is
they're the ones we're talking about. They're the
ones who said that's Iran. Right? Like, you
know where this goes. I've played it a
hundred times, but in case you haven't seen
it, the reality is clear.
Israel funded this group, and it was because
they wanted to stop the two state solution.
So right there is your evidence point. If
you're new to the show, this should open
your mind to the reality that it's not
Iran. It's Israel and The United States that
are funding Hamas in order to justify this
so they can blame Iran and keep them
divided in Palestine.
He knows that, and he's making up stories
to back up Israel at the expense of
Americans and Palestinians and everybody else. Here's a
former prime minister, former head of Shin Bet,
and and others outlining the reality, and I'll
show you directly from the tweet itself. So
are you saying Benjamin Netanyahu
deliberately boosted Hamas to try to prevent a
Palestinian state? Yeah. Sure. He deliberately
and systematically
even even told this on record
whoever wants to avoid
the
threat
of a two state solution
has to support my policy of paying protection
money to the Hamas protection. What we did,
with the permission of our prime minister is
to
let
Qatar
to transfer
a huge amount of money in cash,
probably more than $1,400,000,000
By doing it, we increase the power of
Hamas.
We
did everything in order to make sure that
Hamas will go on controlling Gaza. Listen. And
Palestinian authority
will control the West Bank so they will
fight each other.
That's the point.
Here is an article from Haaretz telling you
that they sent the Mossad chief, that's what
he's talking about, to petition Hamas to continue
funding or rather Qatar to continue funding Hamas.
That's why this game about cut Qatar is
basically allowing the leadership to continue to be
held away. Like, it's obvious what's going on.
K? It this is a game. And here
is Haaretz on the 10/09/2023,
'2 day three two days after October 7,
telling you what Netanyahu said in his own
Likud party meeting in 2019.
The same thing he just told you. Anyone
who wants to support who wants to thwart
the establishment of a Palestinian state. At this
moment, they were outwardly for the world pretending
they wanted that.
They have to
support giving money to Hamas. That is our
strategy.
It's not for aid because if you have
to there's no way you buy aid in
a location that has to ship it in
because there's no aid.
Still, it's very silly the arguments they make.
And that's the point. You're not gonna see
any follow-up from from the Department of State
because they don't care, and they're all lying
about it. So if Israel's funding Hamas, how
do you make sense of what happened on
October 7? How do you pretend Iran is
the one responsible? Yeah. They're lying, guys. It's
as simple as that. They're lying.
Oh, here's how here's another very easy way
to tell. Here, Sam Husseini
says count Rubio's lies.
Oh, that's the wrong one. Here it is.
To the people of this great country,
for whom we have tremendous love and respect
for everything you're facing, have faced, and continue
to face
is an extraordinary
story of bravery.
A nation founded
in the ashes and in the aftermath of
a horrifying crime against humanity
Lie. Stood from its very inception, from the
very day of its birth,
against threats
from every angle and every corner Lie. And
has served as an example
to the world Lie. Of a pluralistic society,
a free enterprise democracy. Lie.
And one that if if there were more
Israels
in the Middle East, more countries like that
Lie. The world would be a safer and
a better place. That's like the third time
he reiterated
that point. Clearly, somebody gave him talking points
in this little parade show while he's in
Israel telling everybody that lies about a a
state committed genocide
right in front of everybody.
This is what we hope for the region
and for our planet. That's true. They want
them to control it very clearly.
A nation that's always sought peace Incorrect. Lie.
Will not allow itself to be intimidated That's
also not. Destroyed by its enemies.
And on that front,
you can always count on us. Well, that's
true. As long as I'm in this position
and president Trump is in the White House.
So thank you. Thank you. You listening, guys?
All those chills trying to pretend, save them
for last. I certainly hope so. It's amazing
what you could ignore, though, as they continue
to show you that that's not true.
Now here is what
Hindustan Times pointed out. Israel security cabinet to
discuss new phase of Gaza truce after Rubio
visit.
So, you know, they've got they they they
gave marching orders. They've they've reassured them. Look.
You can do whatever you want. You can
break it. Less like Trump agreed. That's I'm
willing to bet anything that's what's happening going
to happen. That's the plan. And I'm not
I'm that's my opinion based on the facts.
My point is
that is what the Knesset and people in
Israeli government have been publicly saying they got
assurances from Trump.
So you can they could be lying, of
course. That's why being objective, that's what I
might believe.
But they said that. Netanyahu said that. It's
been roundly shown, and every other part of
they said that what they told you has
already come to pass except the,
the
it's hard to say. They already violated the
ceasefire many times. The publicly stating that the
deal was over because of Hamas or which
they've already kinda floated. The point was second
phase. That's what they agreed to.
And we're just about to get there. So
here's what I saw in this article. It
says Hamas cannot continue. This is what what
both Rubio and Israel are saying. Hamas cannot
continue as a military or government force.
They must be eliminated,
Rubio said of the Palestinian group,
saying
stay Wally's standing next to Netanyahu and said
the two allies had a common strategy and
that the gates of hell will be opened
if all hostages still held by militants and
Gaza are not freed. Well, that's what the
whole agreement is about. Right? So that that
is setting this up to argue that they
did not do something so you can do
that.
The point is you wouldn't need to why
are you threatening? The whole point is this
is already happening. The gate is already going
forward. They're already releasing them, and you're already
it's it's just about, I think, clearly setting
this up.
And it says in a statement, Rubio condemned
Hamas as hostage taking
as sick depravity,
while Israel has way more innocent people. We'll
get to right now.
They released 333
people out of the majority of them yesterday
that were none of them charged with crimes.
And even, what is it,
Barack Ravid
just admitted
that they have children that they've taken who
weren't involved in any fighting.
We're gonna get to it. You don't think
this absolute disgusting Zionist knows that? He knows
that. He is absolutely working for Israel. And
I mean, in the sense of this agenda,
whether he is officially a part, that's up
for you to decide. In this action, he's
working for Israel. It says, and called for
the immediate release of all remaining captains. Well,
that is already what the deal is. I
mean, this is all they're setting it up
to make it sound like they didn't do
what you called for when the agreement they've
already set to, which Israel's violated 17 times
over, is still going.
And then he says,
living and dead, particularly five Israeli American dual
nationals.
And who cares about the other Americans there?
We only care about the Israeli Americans. It
says negotiations on a second phase of the
truce aimed at securing a more lasting end
of the war could begin this week in
Doha. A Hamas official and other source familiar
with the talks have said, They I don't
think they have any intention of going forward
with this.
They're setting this up to be blaming Hamas
for the failure like they've done every other
time. And I mean that we can verify
that's been called out by other corporate media
platforms. Not that that means it's true, but
it shows you that there's just enough opportunists
where they go, we can't just pretend it's
not happening. Everybody sees it. They have been
caught over and over and over. Even Ben
Gavir just openly admitted that they had sabotaged
the deals up until now.
It's amazing what people can ignore. Now here's
an interesting part of this. Now, I my
gut on this is that Hamas is
recognizing the writing on the wall and trying
to expose them like they did the last
time they agreed to the deal, even though
it wasn't in their interest, knowing that Israel
wasn't willing to go forward with it. So
they agreed to it and Israel wasn't expecting
that, and so they bombed Rafa and said
and just acted like something they did was
the problem.
Two times that happened very publicly before we
got to this point. More than that, but
publicly.
So my point is now they see it
I I think they're seeing an opportunity. Just
my gut.
Which is they hear them going, we can't
have a situation with Hamas in power. That
has to be and then they're using that
to say, that's why we just have to
get rid of all of them. Okay. Well,
guess what Hamas just said?
Not clinging to power. Hamas says ready to
stop governing Gaza
to extend the ceasefire. So if Israel then
ignores this, chooses not to even talk about
it, it it shows you that it's not
even really about Hamas. It's about Palestinians,
especially since it's worth considering that Hamas is
still in some way being funded by Israel.
They were right up until October 7, which
I still argue does not in no way
does it invalidate the act of legal resistance
even if they've funded it to happen on
top because it's just it's just a bay
it's a static reality for occupied territories, anybody
fighting back.
But at the same time,
Oh, I just lost the thread there.
Oh, then basically, even if they were still
fun at this point, you know, we just
don't know. That doesn't mean that some of
them might not be. Like, I just my
point is just continue to if it was
right up until the seventh, which we can
prove, it's certainly possible that some elements of
this are acting against the Palestinian cause.
Or maybe they just took the money and
they're
working against them anyway. I mean, you just
don't know is the point, but it's worth
considering. Here's what it says. Gaza
Hamas indicated a willingness to stop governing Gaza,
the straight times reported,
after the war with Israel, which is what
Israel keeps pretending is what they need. Right?
An overture time for US led efforts to
extend the initial ceasefire and agree terms for
a permanent end of hostilities.
It is not necessary, they say, for Hamas
to be part of the political administrative arrangements
in the next phase for Gaza,
especially if it serves the interest of our
people. Yeah. Sounds like a bunch of monsters.
Right? Now, of course, they could just be
saying what they wanna hear. But if you're
if you're willing to consider that, you should
do the same for Israel, which they all
who often prove is the re is what
they're doing as they get shown the why.
This happens here too. The point is, they
have continued to show that ultimately what they're
doing is trying to stop this what's happening
to Palestine in every possible way, including treating
the hostages well, feeding them, protecting them with
their own bodies.
Because the interest is I don't think keeping
them safe. It's about keeping them safe so
they can get their own people back.
Tens of thousands of innocent children, some of
them being held for a decade or more.
It says the concession will would fulfill one
of Israeli demands for Hamas.
But I'm willing to bet you, this won't
even be brought up.
Because this is what we're hearing. This is
this is from,
oh, yeah. Is it from this is from
today. I haven't refreshed
it. Wait. See, that's crazy. Okay. That's this
these sites almost always auto refresh. It's so
funny, but this one wasn't for all day.
So the sixteenth,
Katz tells US Senators Israel will never agree
to the establishment of Palestinian state. So even
if Hamas goes away, he's saying no. It
doesn't matter because they hate Palestinians. Even if
it means do it in Greenland, they don't
want that. They're saying no. Palestinians can't exist
because that will always threaten us because they
know they stole their land. That's the reality
of it. You care to look in. But
the point is they're simply telling you, it
doesn't matter what they agree to. We don't
want that.
Just like Netanyahu was telling you as far
back as you wanna look if you look
at the facts. They've been
dishonestly sabotaging it from day one.
Credo points out, this is what Netanyahu says,
the day after the war in Gaza, there
will be no Hamas and no Palestinian authority.
I am committed to US president Trump's plan
to create another Gaza.
You just don't it's you can't miss what
this is. They're ethnically cleansing. And Trump said
they will not have the right to return.
There it is.
In case you didn't believe that. Trump says
ceasefire deal should be canceled if I'm on
oh, they changed the title.
That's interesting.
Check this out.
Hopefully, they have it archived.
AP being pressured, I think. Oh, look. You
can see it right there. Trump says no
right of return. Oh, yeah. It's right there.
Look at that. Now ask yourself, why would
AP change the title?
I think it's pretty obvious.
Posted
February 10. Here it is right now. And
that's the same link. I just looked it
up on the archive.
You can see that you can even see
the tie the the writing. Washington, president Trump
said. Washington, president Trump said. It is the
same article. But today,
they changed the title. Trump says ceasefire deal
should be canceled if Hamas doesn't release all
the hostages. It originally said, Trump says no
right of return for Palestinians and Gaza under
his plan for The US ownership. Gee, I
wonder why they weren't okay with that. So
if you don't already recognize the kind of
manipulation we're getting from whether Israel or The
United States,
I just don't think you wanna see it.
This should outrage everybody. They don't Trump doesn't
have a right to ignore their right of
return. That's international law, like everything else they
ignore,
or ownership of another location. It's just transparent.
I'll include both these so you guys can
check it out. It's very clear how this
stuff happens, and people just don't wanna look
at it.
But
Trump's plan. No. It's Netanyahu's plan. It's always
been Netanyahu's plan through multiple administrations and multiple
presidents, but he has a knack for making
it the so he just what so you
have to look at it. Either he has
a very clear ability to just get them
to do what he wants because he's that
good at his job, or there's other influences.
And every single president seems to be
compromised.
As he just goes, oh, Trump's plan. No.
It's been the same plan. Same thing was
Biden's plan for the thing that no. It
was the same long term plan that you
guys have always been doing. It's just another
flavor to it.
Now Israel
repeatedly
I mean, we're talking hundreds of times have
violated the ceasefire according to many different reports.
That was January 21.
I one of them I highlighted on the
January 30 where they literally opened fire on
released Palestinians
that they released during the exchange.
But very few people covered it because who
cares. Right? Well, Muhammad Shehada also pointed out
that Netanyahu was deliberately, just like every other
stage of this, were pretending to bring in
food and having all of this Zionist
caravans and bulldozers and trucks or tents, which
is included, in Gaza,
which they assured them would be part of
the deal. Dozens have come in,
but they have only allowed a handful since
since the the time they're talking about this,
even though there were 60,000
and caravans and 200,000 tents they were agreed
to, just in the first phase. That hasn't
happened.
But, see, even Hamas is like it's like
there's no interest in them. Like, if they
were about trying to blow this up, they
have 57 reasons already to call this out,
but they just keep going. Let Israel have
their childish, juvenile, disgusting actions as long as
this keeps going that may end the whole
thing. Seems like only one group cares about
the human life of the dynamic.
And here is what they said, which I
think very clearly continues to show you that
they're going to blow this up. Same thing
we counter referenced earlier, but here's the clip.
President Trump and I
are working in full cooperation and coordination between
us. We have a common strategy,
and we can't always share the details of
this,
strategy with the public,
including when the gates of hell will be
opened
as they surely will. Do you hear that?
How does that make sense?
Because that's what Donald Trump said. So now
and Rubio, by the way. So now you
got a point where he's saying as they
surely will. Well, wait. The whole point was
if you get them back or if they
if you don't, then that'll happen. So now
you're just simply saying we're going to open
the gates of hell on an entire civilian
population of people, which includes, in still some
cases, your hostages, assuming you don't get them
back? That sure makes sense. It really does
if you understand that's always what they've been
doing and the plan is to destroy all
of them. And I genuinely think also the
hostages.
Every one of them that has come out
has made them look stupid. Who have continued
to tell you they've been treated
kindly. They were fed. They protected them. They're
healthy.
And I'll go into it in a second.
Again, the horrifying reality of the people that
they're letting out, even though they've got plenty
of food, plenty of water, they just don't
give it to their prisoners.
They're hostages
who are children in many cases.
If all our hostages
are not released
until the last one of them,
Israel is determined to achieve all the war
objectives we
But just to be clear, that this is
how he said that. As they surely do
with the public As they surely will if
the hostages aren't released. As they surely will
if all our hostages
are not released. Now the point there, I
think, is that that's the Bebo's overlap. Is
they're going to make, I think that's the
play,
an argument that they violated it because of
some overlapping arguments that that they killed those
people and are gonna blame it somehow on
them and say that somehow violates something. It's
just a thought. But I think at some
case, they're going to make an argument for
why this is their fault even though it's
not.
And even Horett says Netanyahu plans to tack
Iran and is plotting to lure Trump into
the war.
It's obvious.
But here's how it's showing where, is this
a trick and is it big? It's just
like, this is just so stupid. The people
that fall for this stuff, man.
Now Hussein made an interesting point here. He
says two unrelated events that took place within
an hour from each other. Now in case
you didn't see this,
Lebanon,
Chuck Craig Murray, and plenty of others have
been breaking this down without question, showing you
what's happening.
And nobody seems to care in the corporate
media, the people in the government, and so
on.
Israeli forces announced they will not withdraw
from five hills in Southern Lebanon after the
deadline.
Just no reach because we don't want to
because our whole time because we're building settlements
already. Didn't you know? We already have Hebrew
names picked out for your territory because we're
fighting terrorism or whatever.
It's very clear.
Israeli forces announced that. Another event,
Lebanese government announced extending the ban on flights
to, flights to and from Iran.
So he just simply pointing out two other
related events that may be related.
So both of them are happening. And the
idea is clearly they're continuing to illegally occupy
Lebanon. That's obvious. Whether or not that's the
Lebanese government, I think, is clearly compromised by
Israel,
is ultimately
hindering the ability of Hezbollah to be able
to push back as the argument. Now it's
obviously Iran supports all these groups. To say
that they are Iran is not the case.
It's like The US giving weapons to people
they support. Is Israel The United States? Oh,
it's worth you can make an argument if
you're gonna make the same point, and there's
very clear influence. But you can still argue
they're separate entities, and The US gives weapons
to Israel.
I mean, it's almost a bad example because
I do think there's obvious connection there, but
speaking about one of their allies, with Germany.
They give weapons to Germany that make that
part that is that The US? The point
in this case is you could prove that
they are not.
Or that they're or they're really just they're
simply continuing to use these groups to make
it seem like anything things that Iran or
the rest aren't even doing. But the point
is this is about them continuing to supply
just like with Syria.
The US supplies weapons to some of the
most I mean, to the most despotic regimes
on the planet.
But we'll have to wait and see what
happens. Lebanon is still being occupied. Now in
regard to the hostages,
this is what you're seeing come out of
Israel's
prisons.
Upon his release to Gaza as a part
of the prisoner exchange, Palestinian elderly man, Galib
al Radi, was found to have endured severe
torture and abuse in Israeli detention. His body
bore visible marks of brutal treatment that he
suffered. And these are old, guys. You can
see that this person has endured this for
years.
This is what they go through. And, you
know, assuming they're not raped along with that,
But if you still pretend it's not true,
you just are a dishonest person as they
debated about why it should happen on Israeli
media.
Mainstream,
like, the largest channels they have.
Here's an example we showed you previously.
Palestinian hostage shows signs of torture and severe
starvation.
Najir Jamal
Hussein, at least as part of the deal,
displaying clear signs of torture and starvation. His
unintelligible speech and and emaciated appearance highlight the
severe mistreatment endured. So if you if you
could it's in another language, but the point
is it's just so incoherent. These people are
like, the guy we say came out, he
couldn't even say his name.
I mean, that's years of, like,
severe
psychological torture, rape, and abuse. Don't forget, even
but seldom
wrote about they they used dogs to rape
these people. I know that's disgusting and even
hard to hear, but it has been reported
by human rights groups.
Or I'll and I'll include this one just
in case you haven't seen this stuff.
This is B'Tselem, the leading Israeli human rights
group
telling you I mean, the whole thing is
called Welcome to Hell, and they're discussing Israeli
prison system as a network of torture camps.
And the main one they're highlighting in this
is raised because of it is the Sid
Timian or is that I think it's pronounced.
Sid Tiamen.
The camp where the person was on video
being caught raped by a bunch of male
soldiers.
Disgusting.
This is what your government support.
And this is one of the people they
released who can't even barely intelligible when he's
speaking, but is clearly tortured.
Here's another one. This is the chairman of
the Euromaid human rights group,
Rami Abdul, saying the horrifying scenes of released
Palestinians detainees from Israel prisons keeps unfolding. No
a word in the comments.
No one in the word world in the
comment but no one's commenting on it. The
is is is it's Israel, the Western world's
project in the heart of the Arab world.
I mean, the what you're looking at there
is not just torture, but disease and scabies
and inf infestations, and they're doing this to
them according to all of them.
I can't it looks like he's missing an
eye. Yeah. He's missing an eye.
Just it's just disgusting. This is the usual,
guys.
Now suppressed news. Highlight. Now this is a
report. Take it for what you will. These
are people that are reporting.
They put viruses in our food to infect
us with diseases.
Now this is just the cause at large
as well as prisoners. We've already seen that.
Deborah Robert wrote an article where they were
on the record saying essentially, let it continue
because it'll make them easier to remove.
Now if you believe that they're willing to
let that happen and not keep it going
or make it happen, I just don't I
mean, it seems very
naive
because they've already been caught doing things like
this many times, and I'll make that point
right now. And I mean, specifically, the Israeli
government. But you can also go back to
historical discussion of the earlier points of Zionism,
But this points out this is a harrowing
testimony from one of Gaza's Prisoners released today,
describing how diseases were transmitted to detainees through
food, with some even subjected to amputation of
their legs under torture. That has been backed
up by human rights groups. They put viruses
in our food to infect us, he says.
For six months, we were infected with disease
and multiple forms of infection. The Israeli forces
saw us crawling on the floor whenever they
called on us because we had no energy
to walk or move due to the lack
of food and medical attention. And when we
asked for help, they said, later, later, go
away. The worst prison was Ophir Prison. It's
the tomb of Palestinian detainees.
It's crazy. Now here's an example of one
of these people coming out missing a leg.
And this guy was a young kid,
been there for a long time. And the
point is that he was told the whole
time Gaza's destroyed. It's cool. I mean, it
is. But in a sense, there are no
more people left. And so here he is
coming out, just crying, going out. My leg
is gone. I but I I can't believe
there are still people here. They told us
it was long gone. Long live Palestine. Long
live Palestine. Think about that.
Even after everything he's dealt with, he is
standing his ground for Palestine.
While Israelis are fleeing to the parts of
the world because, you know, it's getting a
little more uncomfortable there. I'm talking about the
people that are well behind all of the
kaboots. This it's just obvious what's really happening
and who really cares about what.
I'm here, by the way.
Actually oh, yeah. So this this was about
the poisoning them discussion. Right?
I I think it's important. I already made
a point about this before. To recognize that
all of these tropes and these, you know,
whatever they call them, these fake stories about
why you hate Jews.
Men almost all of which are about Zionists
and what they've done, that it can be
proven to you. In this case, as I
even showed before, here's a recent example of
Israeli settlers poisoning a well in Hebron. And
this was publicly covered even by Haaretz. It's
a video of them doing so. Now under
and and one of these conversations
gets pushed back on by a lot of
them by people like Rabbi Shmueli, who go,
yes. We love to be murder people and
poison the wells because that's one of those,
blood libels, they call it.
Here's Soretz.
Wrote this article was written in 2022.
Place the material in the wells. Documents point
to Israeli army's nineteen forty eight biological warfare.
It's exactly what you think. Read it for
yourself. They poison the wells for the obvious
reasons, and then that became a story that
got turned into you hate Jewish people because
it's true, apparently.
And, again, understand we're talking about the Zionist
organization that, yes, overlap with Jewish people, but
it's not about the Jewish religion.
That is what they've been doing for a
very long time. And people like Shmueli are
playing their role. And guess what? They're doing
it again,
or have been for a very long time
and to them in their presence, apparently. Now
Asalrod points out, where's the wall to wall
coverage of the gaunt and tortured Palestinians released
today? One of them even missing a leg.
Also being forced to wear these Star of
David shirts, which frankly, to me, it's a
smaller point in all of it, but
they were raising a hell about the fact
they were having a Palestinian necklace or whatever
it was. So they just do it back
because they're children.
But here
is where Barack Ravid exposes something important to
you.
He says, on next Thursday, the fortieth day
of the ceasefire,
the four additional bodies will be released. In
exchange for the bodies, Israel will release and
again, that guys, that's the people's family in
part.
Israel will release all the women and minors
under the age of 19
who were arrested by the IDF
in Gaza since October 8,
since a year a year over a year
ago,
and were not involved in combat.
Do you realize how crazy that is? This
guy, who, by the way,
the global affairs correspondent for Axios, CNN analyst,
Washington correspondent for Walla, author of Trump's piece,
literally says and this guy guy is is
Israeli supporter. He's he's he's writing in Hebrew
about this conversation and is very clearly a
Zionist. He's telling you
that there is admitting that Israel has taken
children
for no reason.
Now what even if they're kept in the
best of conditions, that's a war crime. And
we know they're not kept in the best
of conditions because they're being released and they're
being shown to have been tortured. Even the
children. I've gone over this extensively.
But they're telling you, why would they take
women and children who are 19 who weren't
involved in combat? Because it's about going after
Palestine. And let's be clear, they've admitted a
hundred times over that they're killing whoever.
Everybody. Children, women, it doesn't matter. Even going
back well before October 7, even covered by
harrettes.
Here is just one quick example
of one of the many, by the way,
whistleblowers
from the IDF. We spoke with the corporate
media and Israel's media
about how they were told to kill whoever.
Do you think that you witnessed
war crimes taking place?
Probably.
The ground assumption is that they are Hamas.
And then if you go this way, you're
bound to kill people that are not.
Now in a rare interview,
one soldier tells us about the reality he
says he witnessed.
What kind of stuff would they say? There
are no uninvolved,
only unarmed. This is something that I'm going
to carry for the rest of my life.
So here, in regard to
the shirt they were wearing, it's simply saying
Israel's force, Israel's move to force release Palestinians
to wear shirts with the star of David
logo, so is Zion a symbol, and we
will not forget or forgive is what it
says written in Arabic,
has prompted anger and been slammed as a
racist crime.
You can agree or disagree.
But if we damn well know that if
it was in reverse, they would call it
that. If it was Jewish people with an
Arabic symbol
that said, we will not forgive or forget
in in Hebrew,
they would lose their minds and call it
anti Semitic. You damn well know that. So
it can only work one way, and it's
the same old stupid game. But the point
is not about the symbols because, again, it
it's just
I just not it's not to me, it's
a small thing. The point is about stating
we will not forgive or forget or forget.
These are people that you're admitting weren't even
charged with a crime.
That's literally the main one of the main
points here from a from
a, from a,
I'll just say report, which again is very
easily demonstrate. This is a demonstrable fact.
The and this has been covered by the
United Nations, by by human rights groups, Amnesty,
human Bethsallam, Human Rights Watch. They are not
being charged. It's called administrative detention, and they
have a military system, court system for children.
It's the only place in the world that
has one of those.
Only for Gaza only for
anything other than Jewish Israelis.
So the point, guys, clearly, if you're gonna
write we will not forgive or forget or
forgive with people that haven't even charged the
crime, who weren't even involved in fighting, then
it's about Palestinians.
Here's what the report said. 333
of them are people, Palestinians,
who were detained from Gaza, who were just
taken by Israeli forces for questioning with no
sort of charges or trial
against them. So 333
will be going back to Gaza. Ten will
be released into the occupied West Bank, one
to occupied East Jerusalem, and then 25 of
those men who are from the occupied West
Bank will be deported, and then they will
first be sent to Gaza and then off
to living in exile as Right. So they're
being ethically cleansed, which is a crime. But
on top of that, did you hear that
one of them is gonna go back to
Israel proper? How do you explain that? So
you've kept a guy in prison with no
charge, and you're gonna send him back to
Israel
because he's not a threat to you, then
why were you keeping him this whole time?
There's not even gonna be an explanation. No
one's ever gonna investigate. Nobody cares, especially not
your government.
That's crazy. And it shows you the reality.
These are all there are 333
of them. And you realize the children that
have been let out over and over this
process,
ten years they've been in there. This is
not unique to October 7. That's the most
important thing to hear. This has been going
on for seventy six years.
Now Talid el Sabawi,
PhD,
points something interesting out, which I I have
already reported on.
They've confirmed with multiple patient reports that in
the last one to two weeks, the Israeli
government has unilaterally and sneakily begun
forcing patients who medically evacuate from Gaza. So
the ones that like a the child that
Trump says, let's get those cancer kids out.
Right? Forcing them to sign paperwork
at the exiting checkpoint saying they cannot ever
return to Gaza. That's why Trump said no
right of return. They're not allowed to come
back because
you hate Palestinians because we're ethnically cleansing for
Israel. That's the real point. None of the
NGOs helping with the coordination of the medical
leave acts were informed by the entity or
any governing body that this would happen. Ethnic
cleansing aside, mothers are being forced to leave
their children behind to travel with a sick
child. And almost every family is being forced
to leave family member behind. And now they're
being told they will not be able to
come back. Remember in the Northern Gaza conversation?
They were being forced to give iris scans
and and biometric scans and having them sign
documents to say they would forego their right
to return and give any keys back if
they still had keys, which by the way
are keys to buildings that still exist in
Israel.
Actually,
Palestine, guys.
How do you not see what this shows
you? That's what UNRWA is all about. That's
why they had to destroy it. Because they
are effectively
covering up the history that they have taken
this, even though we all know it.
Not that the Israeli government cares, it says,
but this violates international law. And given the
document was signed under duress, that's what I
said earlier, it's meaningless, but they don't care.
This is the this is the group we're
talking about, and your government is right there
with them. Now, of course, Donald Trump, through
true social, says Hamas just released three hostages
from Gaza, including an American citizen. They seem
to be in good shape.
I think what he wants you to do
is write this thing that he did that.
Right? Because I said this threatened him. No.
They've all come out like that. The last
three that were slightly less fed because probably
a different location, they're taking care of all
of them. Even those three said so. To
pretend they were emaciated while the ones released
from from Israel's prisons were ghosts is disgusting,
and it shows that you're a disgusting person.
It says this differs from their statement last
week that they would not release any hostages.
Well, no. What they said was that there
was a ceasefire issue and that they were
gonna hold off on that exchange.
Oh, again, he's just bending the facts to
make it seem like he somehow coerces into
reality. They were Hamas has never been
claiming anything otherwise. They were going to continue
this process as long as Israel,
you know, continued to hold up the ceasefire.
And it says, Haas, Israel will now have
to decide what they will do about it
by 12:00. This was the fifteenth.
Right? So all they did was continue down
this process, and I think my point was
they're already telling you they're gonna break this
in the second phase.
I I think the evidence is obvious.
But, again, once we get there, we'll find
out. And it says, I wrote that I
miss your post about these civilians released by
Israel who were never charged with a crime.
Did you care? Did you freak out about
them? Of course not. Not a single comment.
Nobody cares. These people are deliberately ignoring everybody
coming out of those prisons. Think Think about
how gross that is. Have you seen lived
at TikTok or any of the rest of
them start screaming about how bad that is?
They're human beings. Why don't you care about
them? Because you're you're broadly assuming they all
must be terrorists even as Israel tells you
they were never charged with a crime?
Yeah. So that's something Ben Shapiro would do.
You're in good company.
Here's Sarah Wilkinson pointing out, this is on
top of everything
else, released during the ceasefire hostage swap,
Israeli troops raid the homes of Palestinian
of home of Palestinian, Laiad al Balboa,
assault and batter him, and then take his
two sons.
I mean, I don't know why they would
just take him too. They've already done that.
They've already released people and then picked them
back up a day later despite that being
a direct violation of the ceasefire. But in
this case, they beat him up, leave him
there, take his sons.
Because that's what they can do here because
there's no accountability and they live in an
apartheid occupation state.
You're not gonna hear anybody scream about that
while Trump makes a big case about how
the people weren't harmed. I mean,
we are in a really disgusting situation here,
guys. We need to recognize that. We're all
the good people in this country. I know
it's the majority. Speak up.
IROMED monitor points out as dozens of Palestinian
detainees are freed, horrific testimonies of torture, starvation,
medical neglect, and Israeli prisons are surfacing. And
it is all over the place.
Now in contrast,
here are the ones we're supposed to be
told are the ones held by the terrorists
in torture dungeons.
The smiling, well fed,
in many cases, not even like, they seem
like they got sun. Right? Because they did.
They they were told. And we went shopping
in some cases. That it was that was
the women in the past cases, but this
has been discussed publicly.
Not emaciated, not tortured, most of them laughing
and having a good chat when they walk
out. Whereas these guys over here can't even
remember their name.
But, you know, splitting hairs. Right? Splitting hairs.
Another example from the prime minister of Israel
showing you these people walk out and, you
know, and yeah. The point is not you
know, anybody would be happy to see their
family again. Right?
But that does not appear to be somebody.
And best and just in case you already
missed the point, they've already continued to tell
you that they were treated kindly. Like, all
the rest of them, surprise, surprise,
they don't seem like they suffered. Now let's
be clear, being taken regardless is scary, terrifying.
You don't you don't know what's gonna happen.
I'm not trying to belittle that circumstance. That's
a horrifying reality.
But clearly, we keep seeing the outcome.
So if you wanna keep hyping the unknown
when we know that you're being dishonest.
Same point.
Here's another one.
So it's like they're coming back from some
vacation. Or when they went the women went
on the stage and they hold their arms
up. It's like some sporting event. Like, they're
it just doesn't make any sense. I mean,
it does, but how people can't see it.
Look at that. Yeah. No big deal. Wearing
your sunglasses, everything's fine. I mean, it just
seems silly to me.
Now, lastly, to wrap this up,
I'm telling you guys, I sense this. I've
been saying it for a while. Well, before
this even came back up around the hostage
conversation with ceasefire,
the cousin of Shiri Baob Bivas, despite the
father being out and continuing to say they
were killed,
believe they're alive.
I'm telling you my opinion this is my
my opinion is this is being driven by
the Israeli apparatus, the intelligence game. They're making
this happen to keep it going. That's what
I think. I mean, how do you make
sense of this? The father has said it
ever he's he's out, guys. And he still
tells you they're they were killed by these
bombs. He believes that. It says right in
this article.
What? That's right here. It's,
the father was told they were told they
were killed, whereas right here, he believed them.
So they're trying to really abstractly
say that he still says they're dead. I
was telling you that from the day one.
And that's a horrifying thing to talk about,
guys. It's sad. It's disgusting. But let's not
forget, they were killed by IDF bombs.
And that that's still reported by them. And
on top of the fact that we already
know that's been happening more than once according
to other as released hostages.
So they just want you to keep thinking
they're alive so they can use them. That's
what I think. And that makes me sick.
Now another point, you have people like this
Maria Madem,
Medvin, who I've seen in the Zionist
propaganda circles,
saying just nine hours ago, for some reason,
just driving this back out there,
only three teeth of hers were buried.
That's all the Palestinians
left of her, not Hamas, mind you, but
see, that's what they care about
on October 7.
Everything else was they burned beyond recognition. Oh,
is that I wasn't aware that Hamas had
that ability. Oh, that's right. They don't.
You don't think she knows that? Like, this
is the most lazy, desperate effort, and it
makes me sick because they're using the memory
of people they pretend to care about.
The only group that had the capability
to burn or decimate beyond recognition
was Israel,
as you already know. And she goes, remember
that when you discuss what should happen to
Gaza. So they're trying to use the lie
about these people to can to get you
to go along with the destruction of Gaza
because these are monsters.
And as Max Egan rightly pointed out, no.
That was the IDF. And everybody's
very broadly reported that. Even
Haaretz,
even Times of Israel.
Here's another example. I think it's still down
here. This is Mint Press News covered, former
Israeli defense minister. It's not just because of
the screenshot, guys. We've already covered this. He
said they admitted it was in a recent
interview to using the Hannibal directive.
So did a recent another colonel before that?
How crazy is that? And so
if you know that, and Hamas only had
the weapons that we've talked about, not the
ability to do what even burning in a
house would not cause that. It's the explosion
we're talking about. That is the hellfire missiles.
That is the tanks in the houses.
Everybody knows that, and they're still trying to
gaslight you
so they can take over Gaza.
Again, Jonathan Cook's article, just in case you
want it's a good article. The Gaza war
was a lie as is the ceasefire. Trump
just told you.
And lastly, Israel has on top of everything
else issued a tender for construction of nearly
a thousand new illegal homes in the illegal
settlement in the occupied West Bank.
No big deal though because that's been going
on for fifty years. Nobody nobody says anything.
They're all illegal. Nobody I mean, even Pompeo
tried to try to make it it was
like it wasn't inconsistent with the law. Everybody
else has been like a straight up illegal,
including other past Republican administrations.
Pompeo was the only one that gave him
a little bit of air,
and Trump's doing the same thing.
It's illegal, especially if you're now displacing all
of the West Bank.
Lastly,
reported today by Mint Press News, civilians in
Southern Lebanon, which they're now pushing more into
and occupying, discovered that Israel has placed dummies
on roads to lure people in.
The tactic has been report has reportedly been
used to attract Lebanese villagers in order to
kidnap or shoot
them. Similar tactics were used in Gaza, where
Israeli drones would play sounds of crying babies
to draw Palestinians out of their homes and
tents so that they could be subjected to
sniper fire, which shows you that they're playing
on the kindness of those people, knowing that
they were going to help somebody in the
midst of an ongoing genocide.
How many more ways do you need to
see what side you should be standing within
all this? And it's not about it's only
about the people who are being subjugated, destroyed,
ethnically cleansed, murdered, genocided.
Not a hard thing to see. But it
just makes it easier when you get stuff
like this. When you're showing the kind of
tactics that these monsters are using, that if
in any other context for any other person
anywhere,
you would call that terrorism.
And I do anyway because it is. But
most seem to ignore it.
That is disgusting.
And we're talking about civilians, guys.
Also, you know, putting out little cans that
look like food that are with children's cartoons
on them so children open them and blow
themselves up because it's a grenade.
That's been covered by human rights groups.
Or Abby Martin's covered for decade plus, two
decades of the butterfly bullets and the and
the toxic gases they use and the the
tear gas that kills and causes seizures, you
know, the normal stuff.
This is the world we live in.
I'm not okay with that.
I wanna change that.
I think we right now have more of
an opportunity to change that than I've ever
seen in my life.
It just matters if whether you want that,
whether you're willing to marshal whatever resources you
have in your
in your wheelhouse and your orbit,
and then so does your neighbor,
and so do your friends, and so do
the people in the next town over. So
does when everybody starts giving what they can
to see something change in the way we
all seem to want to, we could make
something happen.
That's just that's all it's about. And and
maybe that'd be tomorrow for all we know.
Maybe it'll be a year from now. But
the point is, start doing it yourself.
Start caring enough
to just do what's right. Who cares what
the left and the right say? What your
circle say? What the social groups on Twitter
say? Do what you know to be right.
And I think we can all acknowledge that
what they're doing is simply not right.
Stand up. Find the courage.
Now is the time.
Thank you for tuning in today, guys. I
appreciate your support.
Never been a more important time to stand
up
and just show the world that you stand
at this point more than ever. On the
side of your principles, your integrity,
what we know to be right. Now, I'm
sure we disagree in some cases on what
that may look like. But I'm of the
mind that the vast majority of just human
beings
generally agree with what we largely think is
right and wrong and gassing and murdering and
raping and torturing it. Pretty sure we all
agree is wrong.
Just call it out.
Thank you for tuning in today, guys. I
love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant. When were you in Gaza?
End Of April for the first couple weeks,
and then there's sniper bullets. I have children
that were shot twice. Wait. You're saying that
children in Gaza are being shot by snipers?
Definitively.
I have two children that I have photographs
of that were shot so perfectly in their
chest, I couldn't put my stethoscope over their
heart more accurately
and directly on the side of the head
in the same child. No toddler gets shot
twice by mistake by the world's best sniper,
and they're dead center shots.
In fact, more than 20 doctors recently in
Gaza
also told Sunday morning about gunshot wounds to
children.
One American doctor told us he even reviewed
CT scans to confirm what he saw because
he, quote, didn't believe that this many children
could be admitted to a single hospital
with gunshot wounds to the head.
Some shootings
have been captured on video.
So of all the disaster zones you've seen,
how does Gaza compare?
All of the dis disasters I've seen combined
combined. 40 mission trips, thirty years,
ground
zero,
earthquakes.
All of that combined
doesn't equal
the level of carnage
that I saw against civilians
in just my first week in Gaza.
And when you say civilians,
is it mostly children?
Almost exclusively children.
I've never seen that before.
Never seen that. I've seen more
incinerated children than I've ever seen in my
entire life combined.
I've seen more shredded children
in just the first week. Shredded? Shredded. What
do you mean? Missing body parts, being crushed
by buildings, the greatest majority, or bomb explosions,
the next greatest majority. We've taken shrapnel as
big as my thumb
out of eight year olds.
The UN reports that to date, more than
80% of Gaza's population has been displaced and
the majority of its buildings
destroyed.
A reality which has taken its own toll
on the well-being of children.
What about the emotional wounds? How can you
measure that?
I can't measure my own.
How do you be a,
an orphan
watching your family, you know, melted in front
of you and shredded in front of you?
How do you fix that? Ever fix that?
In fact, so many Palestinian children have had
family members killed that doctors created a shorthand
term,
WCNSF,
wounded child,
no surviving family.