Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent
news as we see it from the last
twenty four hours.
Wednesday, February twelfth twenty twenty five. Thank you
for joining me today. Definitely a lot to
get to. Never seems to be a day
where there's not just an endless amount of
information to cover. Definitely gonna pull a few
things aside today to make sure we focus
on what I think is the most relevant
to what we just discussed
and
and kind of what, you know really, I
just kinda say out loud what I've been
doing lately. Just kinda trying to balance what
I've seen developing
from what we've talked about with kind of,
like, whatever we think is most pressing in
the moment,
which is not always what we're focused on.
Right? We're not always just what's the current
thing everyone's yelling about. Sometimes I just deviate
and focus on something else entirely, but I
try to balance those and and
see what I think is most relevant out
of all of it. So today,
following up on the show we talked we
we, recently had entitled Trump spending $7,400,000,000
sending, excuse me, 7,400,000,000.0
in weapons to Israel, the USAID shell game,
which we're gonna touch on again today, Trump
to resettle
Africa Conners, African ears for both in The
United States.
Those are the Dutch immigrants that are in
South South Africa. And, of course, this is
an interestingly
contradictory
conversation. That'll be relevant to what we're gonna,
some points, we'll make today.
Also, we're gonna get into some interesting and
alarming
I mean, we've been following this for a
while now, but the continual incremental steps on
Twitter x and
just laying the path to what we keep
seeing. And now we see the x money
beginning. We've we knew that was coming. We
saw the partnering with Visa. We covered that
on the show, which any one of these,
if they were Democrats, the entire Republican
party would be screaming about why this is
a problem. It should be a problem either
way. But But now we're gonna talk about
an interesting overlap to a new company, which
seems to be primed,
focused on digital IDs. And this is gonna
be for securing, you know, your identity in
order to be able to use this platform
and the money and, you know, the the
everything chat dynamic that there or the everything
app dynamic that they're
he's focused on.
I mean, it's almost hard not to see
where this goes. At some point, you're going
to need to require something that verifies who
you are, and, eventually, that will become something
you use to initiate during with these many
different processes. And remember, these are the people
that are behind,
you know, like, this core group with Elon's
kind of the the PayPal mafia as they've
been coined, are behind, like, all of the
major entities within Silicon Valley.
And so stand back and think about how
all these moves are
continuing to consolidate control in very clear directions.
And it's
but you can argue maybe don't think he
knows that, but I think that's hard to
miss. But we're gonna talk about how that's
developing in Twitter,
where that's continuing to go, and how people
are blinding themselves to it, and the censorship,
by the way, what we continue to touch
on. We mentioned on Aim Wake Up recently
or Steve discussed,
going underground, being censored on Twitter, again, for
inauthentic behavior. It's just propaganda, guys, or rather
censorship of what they call propaganda. This is
we've talked about,
Astrin,
Ratsani. I always have a problem with his
name, but I love his work. We've we've
talked in the past, and we follow each
other. I think he's doing amazing work, and
they censored his show on Twitter.
And it's obvious why, and we'll go over
that.
And we're also gonna talk about the AI
direction and where that continues to go. And
what I can't stop seeing as the obvious
plan for what I mean, what they're telling
you, by the way, is what I think
is happening. I just seem to think that's
more alarming than some that were calling that
same problem out thirty seconds ago, but outlining
how that continues
and the not ending of the deep state,
apparently, despite all the screaming of certain narratives.
And, of course, we're gonna get into the
Gaza deal,
which I mean, this kind of the overlap
of the ceasefire implosion, which we told you
was gonna happen, not because we guessed, but
because they told you it was gonna happen.
And we reported that they told you it
was gonna happen, and then everyone in the
West and the media and the government acts
like we're so confused. And Hamas broke the
deal even though we told you that they
said they were going to break the deal
right now. It's it's it's it's almost juvenile
how stupid this whole thing is lately, where
we can show you what I just said,
that they said Trump made the deal for
this to happen, and we reported that then,
and we told you, and then we documented
as they broke it each time. And and
yet here we are, and the argument is
Hamas is breaking the rules, and we're gonna
go back to this, and we're gonna take
Gaza, and we're gonna cover all that. And
it is ethnic cleansing.
I honestly don't even think I have to
convince anybody of that. It's gotta be the
most obvious,
disconcerting,
kind of might makes right forceful effort, where
they're just standing up and acting like everybody
believes them when really they got I've seem
to have a core group of people that
follow no matter what.
And everybody else seems to feel, for one
reason or another, pretty uncomfortable,
uncomfortable, whether it's because he still believes in
the shots, because he's rolled out an mRNA
cancer shot, because he's rolling out the artificial
intelligence infrastructure for what we all see as
a problem under the great reset. I mean,
it's it's there's a thousand different angles for
why each person has their own reason they're
concerned.
Every one of them are enough to be
to at least
stop blindly following. And I think that's a
big issue today, but we're gonna go over
the USAID part again today as well and
highlight the spending
as it continues through certain parts of it.
It. But I feel it's an interesting thing
to continue on. You tell me what you
think about it.
Like, during the COVID nineteen time frame as
we were continuing to kinda follow-up on the
the different releases of of,
the statistics and the metrics around the shots,
and we were showing you how their own
data proved that they were hurting people. And
we were on that relentlessly for months until
finally they stopped doing it. And it's funny
how that bubbled back up, like, a couple
months ago as this was a bombshell.
But now my point is maybe we'll keep
following up on the spending as throughout this
administration, and we probably should in a general
sense anyway, but it's a large job to
keep looking for different things and so on.
But as we showed you last time, Palantir
has all sorts of different engagement and funding
and grants. We also saw USAID not stopping
and continuing like we told you. But we'll
go over all that, so make sure you're
staying tuned today. Plenty to get to.
I'm gonna highlight this show as we mentioned
to start. Trump sending 7,400,000,000.0
in weapons Israel.
Promises made, promises capped. We keep hearing that
about very benign things usually, but the large
ones seem to have not been capped. Now
I was recently, it was Decentered News put
out a post about
the not ending of the Ukraine war.
Now what's funny about it it's kind of
actually, one more point before I go into
the what we're showing.
What's kinda funny about is that
we all see this. It's such an interesting
dynamic where so when Trump came out and
said, I'll end the war in twenty four
hours,
most people were like, well, that's probably highly
unlikely. That seems like a very hard thing
to accomplish.
Maybe he'll do it. The question wasn't whether
look. The question was he said it, so
it matters. And is that what's going to
happen? So we came out and said most
likely not. And then they're, well, let's wait
and see. Let's he but he's gonna follow
through. Or it's that he's same conversation, by
the way, that he's gonna be he's saying
it to make a deal. And we'll play
both and see which one works out for
us, which is kinda like the TeamSport politics
dynamic. That's the you're being trolled until it
actually happens with Greenland as we can see
today.
But my point is that then it comes
to pass where,
you know, one day goes by, two days
okay. Two days in. Promise broken. Right? Well,
that's kind of a silly thing to say
because was anybody really on and then there's
that same kind of current from that same
group that goes, well, Trump says a lot
of things, and we're not supposed to take
them at face value. What are we talking
about right now? So nothing means everything. Everything
means nothing. We'll believe him if we want.
We'll ignore it if we want. And we'll
play it as if we always thought whatever
happened at the end of the day. It's
partisanship and it's infuriating.
My point is that now we have a
right to say, well, the Ukraine war is
not over. So that's a failed promise. But
what you're gonna get in the conversation is,
well, oh, he's gonna end it. Just watch.
Well, okay. Fair enough. Maybe.
But twenty four hours has passed. Aren't we
the one? You get the point. It's just
it's it's almost feels like it's wasting your
time pointing at it. But if we're not
gonna hold people to their word, especially the
president of a country, then what does it
mean?
It's that's an important thing to think about.
And I so I I think we all
kind of knew that wasn't really what's gonna
happen, but you got a lot of aggressive
pushback when you said that what at the
time. Now here we are. I just think
it's interesting.
So
we discussed that somewhat on this show as
well as the USAID game.
Now and and the point was the resettling
the Africa African ears, which is the way
that looks like it makes sense to me,
but people keep saying it different ways.
And I also kinda thought it was, like,
kind of an interesting I guess, maybe they'd
be two e's if it was African ears,
but, ultimately, that would be the name would
kind of make sense with kind of the
pioneering and, you know, whatever else, but
interesting on that point. So if you forget
the idea, it is these are I think
it was, like, 1792.
Off the top of my head, I think
that was accurate, though, was when they immigrated
to
South Africa. And let's not forget that then
from, you know, long period of South part
of apartheid South Africa well after that with
Israel's involvement, %, not debatable.
And, of course, they that that whole community
was there throughout all this and clearly benefited
during that time. Now we see this switching
around of it all. And I don't mean
these specific people, obviously. I just mean, like,
the the immigration of white South Africans.
And now we have a time where that
has shifted. And at the and when it
shifted away from apartheid, absolutely the best possible
thing. Now we have a shifting in directions
towards I mean, the point is racial violence
towards anybody, white or otherwise, is a problem.
That's how we all have to stand with
this. Not it's only bad when Palestinian attack
Israelis. No. It's it's any side of it.
If a Palestinian if there's violence racially motivated,
it's wrong as if we have to make
that clear, but we all see that that's
not how it's equally applied. Even people that
wanna say, rightly
obvious racism allowed towards white people.
Yes. It should be a single line. Right?
But seems like nobody's capable of that in
most of the partisan field. My point in
highlighting this is because Trump, after all the
conversation about immigration and how the the
assimilation and how the and and it's all
fair points, how it weighs down resources and,
you know, we we Americans are dealing with
a lot. Why would you know, all the
main points we've heard.
And then doing this, a group that whether
white or not is not going to assimilate
easily. They're very different culture. And, of course,
on top of that,
it's still immigration, and you're still taking resources.
And so I I haven't heard much about
this at all. That was an executive order,
which by the way, I don't think I
need to reiterate the point, but I will
the obvious difference
that they're white.
And you know me, I'm not really one
to focus that other than when it's necessary
on the point of racism.
I very clearly see how it's abused.
But how do you miss that? So the
point on that, I just wanted to highlight
this and one more point will come over
in a second around FEMA is that Common
Dreams put this out. Quote, he's building a
concentration camp. Fears grow as images emerge of
offshore prison at Gitmo. And we all know
this though. Right?
What's funny about it to me, just to
reiterate it, is okay. And this is a
separate kind of separate conversation. This is supposed
to be, I'm making two points here, about
the immigration point.
Oh, but that's what we're talking about. Right?
No. No. Right? Those are different things. We're
talking about the brown immigrant. Okay. So the
the illegal immigrants, which by the way, that's
not even all of this. Right? There's plenty
of people that are getting we already went
over the Puerto Rican veteran that got swept
up in all this because they weren't using
warrants. The point is that there's this is
supposed to be for people that are illegally
in the country that they're rounding up and
really just immigrants. Okay? But my point first
is that isn't this the exact circumstance that
this very grouping of people and my myself
included, by the way, have been concerned about
when talking about FEMA camps? Maybe it's not
FEMA. Maybe that's the whole way this works.
They make you focus on one thing, and
then they roll it out in another avenue
and you go, but it's not FEMA, so
we're okay.
No. It's the same concept. Just because they're
using it for something else now, they're talking
about building camps for people. How is that
not exactly what we've always been worried about
just because it's the kind of person that
you choose to be okay with right now?
And that's also how these things always go.
They allow you to they they do it
in a way that makes you call for
it. Then it becomes the thing you never
wanted.
My point though is that I find it
fascinating and terrifying at the same time that
this can start to happen. And Guantanamo, of
all places,
at the same exact time as they're bringing
in more immigrants from different locations that are,
like, I guess, supportive of their personal worldview.
But on top of that, then we're also
talking about a couple of different overlaps. Right?
We're talking about the immigrants from the illegal
immigration. We're talking about removing people that might
be pro Palestine and moving them somewhere. Where?
I mean, this is there's so much going
on, and I can't believe
that there's honest people out there that even
if you believe even if they mean what
they say, that you can't see the perp
the potential problem here.
How easily this could spin out of control.
How about if just another power comes into
play?
Another left right dynamic, if you believe that
makes a difference. My point is the same
that we have to see the problem here
as this could be used against us. And
it says there's no reason to build this
in Guantanamo
unless you want to do things you don't
think that you get away with in The
US Mainland.
Of course, the argument's gonna be space.
Fair point in in many ways, but realistically,
that is true either way. Now you are
outside jurisdiction. You can do what we know
they do in places like this, and that's
scary. It should be.
Now on censorship,
the oh, before we get into more about
Twitter in particular, I just want you guys
to see this in case you missed it.
Afshin Ratzani.
Twitter has suspended the account of going underground
with over a 60,000
subscribers
or followers after a decade of posting, breaking
news, and our interviews with world leaders, dissidents.
It's a very, very powerful show. You could
disagree with the what they're discussing, but they
get they've got people from all walks of
life, different countries, different left right paradigm.
But, of course, he was calling out Israel's
genocide.
And and very powerfully to call make in
in having interviews with people from Israel and
their government and so on and making them
look really bad because it's not hard to
do if you ask real questions.
Now it says Elon Musk, Linda Iaccarino, please
rectify this. Twitter was supposed to be the
platform against censorship.
Guess not.
Indicative by the fact that I know I
already retweeted this, but we'll go ahead and
do it again, seeing as how that's how
this platform seems to work.
Patrick Henningsen was just showing you this stuff.
Literally, in real time, showing here I'd make
this comment about Twitter or Elon and look
at how the comments suddenly get removed.
Now he's he wrote he wrote this, and
this was the oh, you know what? I
I did I forgot this video was here.
Let me grab this too. I'll play it
for you. It's not it's only two minutes.
So it says he was suspended without warning
for literally inauthentic behavior.
Now I challenge you to go back and
look at what he's doing. Look at the
account they're sharing. Well, I mean, right now,
you can unless you have an archive, but
look at the work on his platform or
just look at going underground anywhere else. And
you tell me how in any way it's
inauthentic. And then laugh out loud together with
me when we look at how shockingly inauthentic
the Elon inner circle is right now and
how we all seem to know that, how
they've already been caught on the left and
the right having these weird, like, bot farm
or even the the fake funding, whether what
USAID
or some other platform.
It's left and right, and we all know
that if we're actually not being ridiculous about
it. And they are absolutely funding and influencing
whatever's in the interest, sometimes left, sometimes right.
The point is these inner circle people have
been proven already. Some of the Ian Miles
Chong overlap are these people are literally following
along to get along
and being funded for it and sharing certain
things and getting it's very ridiculous. So my
point is you got somebody like this who
you can see very clearly is just doing
his job and gets removed for the very
thing that they know they're doing. It's embarrassing.
So what I'm gonna show you is his
quick little breakdown
of what he's dealing with so you can
see it from from him.
So here's that. I'm just gonna grab it
real quick.
And there it is.
Going Underground's
Twitter account, x account, has been banned for
no reason, no warning
as far as we can tell at the
Going Underground team. Going Underground produced by GAF
TV productions here in The UAE. Why does
Elon Musk and x want to ban going
underground?
Could it be because John Bolton, Donald Trump's
first national security adviser, was recently on the
TV program?
We gave him quite a hard time because
he's no friend of Trump or wants to
destroy his presidency. Could it be because Donald
Trump's
adviser or at least he's a deputy assistant?
He was on the show just recently.
Why would Sebastian Gorka's appearance
on an interview ongoing underground platform on an
x be bad? Surely, it's not that. Is
there a fight between Elon Musk and the
private office of Donald Trump?
Why is he banning things?
Why is there be no response from Elon
Musk's ex organization?
Perhaps it's just a mistake,
or perhaps it's our coverage of Ukraine,
our coverage of Gaza and The Middle East.
Certainly, GAF TV productions, which
produces going underground, it goes out on outlets
all over the world,
hasn't had this, kind of problem before.
So what is the problem with Elon Musk's
x platform?
Or are there people in
Twitter, in x, run by Elon Musk, who
don't like Elon Musk, who don't like Sebastian
Gorka, and don't like any of the pro
Trump voices that we also platform.
That's an interesting point, by the way. Right?
Because just like an old dynamics, we always
pretend that's, like, some random angry Twitter user
Twitter background person.
And, of course, we'd love to pretend like
that's a left thing, except it obviously very
laughably obviously is not. The woke left and
woke right are very real and at large.
And so what's funny is it could be
just the same thing. You dare to challenge
the, you know, the Trump, you know, golden
era or whatever we keep hearing.
Along with those against Donald Trump because that's
what media is and that's what journalism is.
You try and see things from all the
different sides.
So hope Real journalism. Yes. Fully, Elon Musk
will replatform
us. He's an absolutist in free speech, so
he says. Mhmm. And,
perhaps,
he was just taking his
mind off the idea of free speech because
the Tesla share price dropped a little. Who
knows? We'll wait and see. But,
you'll be able to watch our head of
social media fire and armored talking,
about the banning of going underground's Twitter account,
x account,
in a clip.
Also on my timeline
Afshin Ratanci,
which, so far, Elon Musk hasn't banned. But,
hopefully, friend of the show, Sebastian Gork, will
do something about it or
even the Ron Paul Institute because Elon Musk
was tweeting about how he wanted Ron Paul
perhaps to audit the Federal Reserve.
Ron Paul's,
person that he has a show with,
McAdams,
he's also tweeted in support of restoring our
account.
Right. And we'll touch on the
we're on Paul point in a minute.
But he goes on to say,
over more than a decade, Going Underground has
interviewed guests on all sides of every geopolitical
debate. And he really has. Like, if you
look at one he's one of these shows
out there that very well, very clearly
goes beyond the partisan dynamic.
And he said and that's what that's why
I obviously think is a major reason a
a group like this or what he's doing
in particular is problematic. Whether or not you
agree with everything they do, it gives you
what it does, it it it inspires you.
It it it charges you
to think for yourself,
to ask questions. Here's what he's reporting. Here's
what I think. But what do you think?
Very con very, very uncommon today, isn't it?
As you square
share screenshots and suggestions and you and you
demand follow because you're on my team.
That's what's happening today. People like this are
a dying breed, and it's dangerous for the
power structure. Recently, we had Donald Trump's national
security adviser, Sebastian Gorka, as he pointed out.
They you know, pointing out that it's anti
Trump figures
that, like Bolton, it could be a problem
or the proxy war with Ukraine.
He says, on Gaza, we've had Israeli officials
on the program as well as the pro
Palestinian voices. Going underground has always platform both
sides of every issue and has done so
for over a decade. We hope this isn't
censorship as Elon Musk promised this will be
a free speech platform, and we hope this
is an issue which can quickly resolve. I'm
willing to bet you nothing happens, sadly enough.
Nothing. Unless enough pressure from somebody that bothers
Elon enough will make a difference. Then my
point is that all they have to do
is ignore it because the people that usually
scream the loudest about free speech are the
ones that don't care if Elon says there's
their enemies right now.
So the problem is that if nobody says
anything, this goes away, and everyone will just
pretend like it's something that matter. We must
have broken the rules. Oh, he must have
been a bot for Russia. No. No. No.
That's true.
Or you can care about free speech. Right?
I prefer the the latter.
Now let me play this clip for you
real quick. You played it before. It's really
it's a clip from Whitney interviewing on redacted,
and it's really just her highlighting what we've
talked about before, which is the idea of
the
Israeli start up
infiltration of our world. And I'll actually grab
this before we get past we get past
this
before I forget.
Just to as I tend to do, I'm
just gonna grab this show to include for
you about the infiltration of Israeli tech. Oh,
it's the wrong one. I'll do both since
I it's the wrong one.
And the the it's really the main point
is understanding
how much Israel has a government.
Not one religion, not one anything other than
the Israeli government and whoever finds their way
into that power structure, including maybe another country.
How they're influencing
and infiltrating cybersecurity,
technology at general. I mean, it just
digital ID
verification
processes, like, autentics.
That's what that's what this is an important
thing to understand. Okay? And so getting into
this,
Whitney's outlining the the larger point about how
well this has been a long time coming,
and it's been happening for a while. Now
they have Israeli start up companies that are
run by current
intelligent entities from Israel that have the the
ability
excuse me, the ability to shut off,
sabotage,
nuclear reactors,
water infrastructure.
Now, of course, that would never do that.
Right? Unlike, like, they've never attacked The US's
liberty or never on and on and on.
That clear examples of sabotaging, attacking, or spying
on Americans or the government. I mean, right
up until Trump's last administration,
they found spyware in the White House that
was Israeli. But we'll pretend like we don't
know all of this. Now, frankly, I'm of
the mind that there's far more infiltration,
occupation, influencing from, like, blackmail level or whatever
it is that's driving them to make choices
they don't even agree with, then we realize.
That's not to say we know for sure
who might be just in line with the
agenda.
That could be all of them for all
I know.
Worth considering.
Let me play this for you and I'll
add those to the show notes for you
to check out.
So an Israeli intelligence guy forms this company
and says, we're gonna take care of American
hospitals,
dams, water infrastructure. Dams come later, but it
was First Health
and they partnered with CISA that's supposed to
protect critical structure including election infrastructure, but also
things like water systems, the power grid, all
sorts of things like that as well as
hospitals. And beyond that, it's not just hospitals
anymore. As you mentioned, it's expanded to dams,
it's expanded to water systems, and also nuclear
reactors in The United States. So you have
a foreign intelligence
founded nonprofit
being offered
access to all of these critical systems in
The United States. How is this being allowed?
I mean, we know the deep connections between
Israel and The United States. So this is
this goes deeper than that.
And so I'll I'll we conclude we discussed
many times about the the public discussions. Right?
I mean, public discussions
public discussions of
men of Israeli entities in intelligence, unit eight
two hundred and otherwise, openly discussing how they
still carry out the Israeli government agenda.
There you go. I'm still working this out.
The gov the Israeli government agenda
after they either, like, retire,
which some cases, you know, they
whether it's intelligence or not, like, they can
retire on record but still act in the
interest of their government. But in other cases,
active that they do so in the interest
of the current Israeli agenda.
That and this is real time. This is
I mean, we covered it in this in
the this the prince and the spy that
Whitney wrote for TLV.
She referenced an article where they say it
openly. I mean, it's it's unreal how clear
this stuff is, and this has to matter
with everything we've shown, but also this kind
of stuff.
Right? So what what she's highlighting is a
very big problem. Okay? So let's overlap this
with the idea of Twitter.
Because we've gone over that very point a
hundred different times. There'll be a couple more
points today that overlap with that as well
with the AI direction, which is obvious.
But just the point about Twitter, we've talked
about Authentics, we'll show you again, which is
still being utilized, which is an Israeli intelligence
entity, guys. It works with their current intelligence
apparatus. And that is supposed to be, at
least in part,
verifying your identity on Twitter. Well, guess what?
There's a new addition to that.
Now this is before we get to that,
this is from biometric update. So thinking what
Whitney just said,
this is Secure, which is the group we're
talking about. I think it's Secure. That's how
it's pronounced. Nation state fraud ramping up in
2025.
This is from January twenty fourteenth of this
year.
Now it says Secure.
So that's probably right because it's like a
play on Secure, So Cure.
It's spelled s o c u r e
for the podcast. It says a leading digital
identity verification
platform believes 2025
will be the breakout year for digital identity
verification
in The United States.
Gee. They must know something we don't.
You'll see it. It'll be we'll look at
it next.
Expecting to see serious attacks attempted on critical
infrastructure,
like power plants, communication networks, emergency service systems.
Right. So, obviously, that's just that much because
we know that that's cape that the Israeli
apparatus intelligence and otherwise are capable of influencing
these things. It doesn't have to mean that's
the reality. Right? But how many times have
we have to go through this with nine
nine eleven overlaps or the many different examples
or even the potential real time conversation about
the assassination attempts on Donald Trump and whether
there's more going on there from somebody
else.
Donald
Trump
and whether there's more going on there from
somebody else. These are all things that you
should very much consider. The evidence is actually
more clear than you and all the rest
of the things they've been throwing out. But,
overall,
there is an undeniable
mountain of evidence that shows that the Israeli
government has been infiltrating, sabotaging.
I mean, you could go on forever.
The US government and plenty of others.
And if we're still at a point where
we can't acknowledge and be honest about that
with this kind of overlap, I'm gonna show
you next, as well as we already know,
then you I mean, I don't know how
you the reality is then you seem to
be okay with the
detriment, the collapse of this country.
Because what we're continuing to see and ignore
is step by step reality evidence of a
group that's continuing to sabotage this country for
a larger agenda that seems to include the
demise of the West, primarily The United States.
Before we get to all of that, the
point being,
the plans, the communication networks, the emergency services
is what this secure group is saying we
see coming, so we need to confirm who
everybody is, which I don't even really see
how it all comes together other than that
means they're gonna be dictating what you could
access and do, which we all know is
where this is going.
I just want you to think they're justifying
the potential thing, like Whitney and I talked
about before, all of, whether it's COVID nineteen,
whether it's the bioterrorism, all these different things
they project
what, like,
vent two zero one.
What do we see coming? And then it's,
like, literally what rolls out. So just think
about that and think about who has the
influence to control these things and whether that
would benefit
The United States. Of course not.
It would benefit somebody who might
be standing over the collapse of that. But
it says the incoming administration's focus on efficiency
and cost reduction will open the door for
stronger digital identity verification.
So in case it's unclear, this was just
written in January, they're talking about Donald Trump's
administration. I know he loves to say that's
not something even though how many times has
he said that won't happen, and then it
happens and the people that said you were
wrong
will tell you why that's needed right after
the fact. Either way, we all know we
could just change his mind or maybe he's
lying. I know you don't like to believe
that kind of thing. But realize that what
or maybe he calls it something else. Maybe
it's not called the doodle ID. Very simple
to play these games. The point is this
group that we'll show you is about to
is working with Twitter is is literally laying
out the reality that this administration is
opening the door for this thing to roll
out. That's what they're saying.
So this is January 14. K?
Now and this is January 28,
just before this is, you know, of last
month, 01/28/2025.
Michael Beckle says digital identification company, Secure, which
has more than 2,800
customers, including top financial institutions, which is pretty
small when you think about what they're about
to get involved in, and government agencies gave
well, I guess you could read that as
customers maybe being like like a government would
be a customer. Maybe that includes a lot
more of it does make sense to me
when I see what they're involved in. So
think of it like that.
Two twenty eight hundred different customers,
including government agencies, and gave a hundred thousand
dollars to Donald Trump's inauguration.
This is last month, so that would have
been in December.
Interesting. Right? You'll see why this comes together.
So Whitney's point,
is rarely infiltration in tech and what that
might mean and whether they're willing to do
something to carry out some larger attack. We
then have the overlap of that company in
July January 14
saying Donald Trump's administration is the one rolling
all this out, and they see this as
the breakout year. We see that
group
secure donating Donald Trump's administration. Okay. So let's
move oh, here's the actual lobbying,
contribution report so you can see it. Of
course, that's how we roll on this platform.
And that was because of the guy you
shared. That's why I showed you him. He
shared the link, so thank you to that.
I just wouldn't share it if we didn't
we couldn't prove it. Right? Okay. Trump Vance
inaugural committee.
Okay. So let's get to where this all
comes together. So now you got them donating
to Trump's campaign. Right? You got the the
building of the digital ID ecosystem, and they're
all working towards it. They're all excited. Preview.
Some new details on x money. Each user
will have a QR code, which in and
in its own right to me is, like,
of course. I mean, I'm telling you guys,
QR codes are the fast track to, like,
identity theft and so many other problems. It
just kills me that we still use these
things. I'm not even saying that that they're,
like, technologically enough. I just know how easy
it is to manipulate these things. But it
then says, so you get a QR special
QR code, which should be another example of
the wrong direction they're taking you in. And
then at Twitter, we'll be partnering with digital
identity verification SoCure
for ID checks.
Fantastic.
So you can see all of it coming
together, and it says, seems to be launching
with support for Mastercard, American Express, in addition
to Visa. So now you've got all these
three, Visa, which, by the way, Mastercard, all
of them were involved with event two zero
one. They're involved with all these different agendas
and
social credit. They are the the foundation for
social credit. That's how these companies work right
now.
So then you overlap that with digital ID
and verification. Boom. You've got your social credit
score. You've got your digital ID in one
swift one fail swoop.
And how many how you mean, Garland Nixon
was just talking about this. How many people
will come diving into this because they offer
you some kind of carrot?
Here's a little bit of extra digital currency.
I mean, I I don't think it's hard
to see where this goes. We've talked about
the overlaps. I think I have it in
here about potential oh, yeah. There's one we'll
get to in a second, which brings us
even more together.
Here is the actual
this is from 2021.
Secure.
Identity verification startup, Secure, raises $450,000,000
at $4,500,000,000
valuation.
Tiger Global, which I believe I've looked into
in the past. I'm not gonna get into
it all today. There's a few different overlaps
that invest in this company that I see
as, you know, it it to me, it's
it I guess I would label it as
two opinions, so I didn't really include it.
But then I have very clear connections to
numerous people I might point out. But it's
it's it's tangential. It's more of, like, broad.
Nonetheless, look into it for yourself.
That's that's where you get into oh, I
think I I closed it. But there's a
lot of different groups that are, like, venture
capital groups that are involved with this that
I think are kind of shell games for
other governments and other things we're talking about.
But here it says Secure, a company that
uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to verify
identities, Announced today that it raised 450,000,000,
this is 2021,
for a series e round.
Secured identity resolution engine uses predictive analytics to
parse over 8,000,000,000 records,
providing a multidimensional
picture of a cuss consumer's identity.
Now this gets even more alarming when you
overlap this.
Where was that?
With, oh, shoot. Maybe I did bring it
over here
or not. Maybe that I I'll I'll I'll
I always did this myself. I thought I
was jumping at it. The point is there's
a part in here where I think we'll
get to unless I removed it without working
forgetting about it. Talking about how these things
can
be the artificial
intelligence sort of, like, crawlers, they call them
across the Internet that Orville shared with me.
Like, this concerning
building
the building kind of, overtaking of the Internet
of by, like, cro like, bots and so
on, and the overlap with this, and how
they're using your current information that's just accessible
online to train all these AI models, whether
you wanted that or not. Think about that
in the context of where these things go
twenty years from now. So the bi the
biometrics and things you're giving up now, you
don't even realize what they mean. You'll find
out decades from now. My point, the same
as before. All the thing you're posting your
screenshots of what you did that day ten
years ago, that's being used to train AI
models right now. And so that's the point
overlapping with this, is they're using these things
to basically parse over 8,000,000,000 records,
providing a multidimensional picture of your identity and
using that to confirm you. This is this
is this is much bigger than just confirming
that you're you for using Twitter, guys. That's
the way they get this in the door.
And it says he added that the company
is also expanding its partnership with state and
federal government actors
to help them invest in digital identity technology
after hiring a new head of its public
sector business last month. One such use case
for SoCure is verifying identities to prevent unemployment
fraud, cases of which The US of course.
That's that lets the get your arms working
again with Neuralink, not even remotely what it's
really about.
Okay. Another overlap I found interesting. This person
just randomly highlights this.
Doc Labs. We're excited to share that Doc
is partnering with SoCURE to revolutionize
digital identity verification.
That's 10/02/2024.
Now this isn't what I thought it was
at first. This is why you investigate and
research and don't just jump at names like
we see a lot of the partisan media
do. So right out of the gate, I
said, oh, CHEQ.
That's that's like that group we've talked about
that's working with Twitter. Right? Turns out this
is something slightly different, but I'm wondering if
there's more of a connection we realized. I
figured I would show you nonetheless.
So what he says is doc and therefore
CHEQ, which is not the one I I
don't believe it's the same one. I'll show
you what it is in a second.
Partner has over this, you know, many 2,600
customers like we were talking about. So here's
what I thought was interesting.
First, I thought, okay. Well, that's the CHEQ
that SensorBam was talking about.
Worth pointing at either way. CHEQ,
as he says, Benjamin Netanyahu himself asked Elon
Musk to have a meeting with the CEO
of a company called CHEQ.
The guy's former Israeli intelligence,
And one of them is current, by the
way. And in the meeting, they discussed Palestine,
antisemitism,
misinformation,
bots on Twitter. Right? And he goes, we're
being told to give your government identity to
a biometric group, Autentix. I'll show you that
next with deep ties to Israeli intelligence.
There's a growing number of Israeli bots on
Twitter. The Israeli government issued themselves. He said,
I found a bot farm himself, and he
broke it down very clearly. The company meant
to be battling bots on Twitter is also
an Israeli company. The CEO of the Israeli
company is former Israeli intelligence who got a
meeting with Elon Musk after Netanyahu requested it.
The Israeli choke hold on Twitter is absolutely
unbelievable.
I've shared that too, by the way. Funny
how that's no longer there. Wonder if anything
I share even actually goes on my platform
these days. So the point is you can
see that this is a group that's basically
hired to fight the bots, which
fills the platform with bots in the interest
of Israel.
So what I found out oh, and by
the way, this is that group,
Tel Aviv.
Very clearly what it sounds like. I mean,
it's it's a intelligence apparatus. Now here
is the CHEQ,
but it's a cryptocurrency
thing. So I thought, oh, okay. So it's
not actually connected. Maybe it's just, you know,
not even worthy of of commune of discussing.
Right? Here's what I found out though, which
I thought it was interesting, and you can
decide whether this might be relevant to the
future.
It's a it's a digital currency.
I said, oh, that's interesting. So it kinda
came back around, but if there's no connection,
not worth including.
Then I found out.
It's listed under what's called the Israeli new
shekel,
c h e q, and then d. So
it's c h e q as the moniker
for, like, when you use it on, like,
a with a dollar sign, like, for as
a cryptocurrency, but it's actually c h e
q d. It's like Cheqed. Okay?
Cheqed is a platform that operates in Israel
and offers a token called Cheqed.
Interesting. This token allows you issuers verified. Let
me be clear. Just because something's in Israel
does not therefore mean it's it's it's a
problem. Okay? That's not what I'm saying at
all. What I think is interesting let's remember,
there's a lot of people in Israel and
it's a lot. Not even remotely the the
majority, but a lot that are pushing back
on what's going on today. That's important to
understand.
But it says this token allows issuers, verifiers,
and holders to pay each other for digital
credentials
without compromising the privacy and security of users.
It almost sounds exactly like what we're talking
about, doesn't it? Obviously, the verification part of
it, but also the fact that this group
is working with the same overlapping agenda. It's
also called CHEQ. It's also an Israeli intelligence
connected entity that's working with
now I wasn't able to find an explicit
connection, but I just thought that was interesting.
Either way, you now have Secure
that's working with this group for a digital
currency at the same time as they're rolling
out digital identity for a platform that's about
to use digital currency. How much you wanna
bet this or something they work together on
probably rolls out?
I could be wrong, but definitely feels like
a good direction to lean into, to consider
at the very least. It enables users to
participate in governance voting.
Oh, look at that. Contribute to the Czech
network's future. So now you can everything app.
Right? You could buy things on Twitter. You
can fund different government things. You can vote.
We all know this is where it's going,
guys. I I really hope I'm wrong about
this.
And Kate says, just making sure I didn't
miss anything.
So that that was the thought. So just
to be clear, unless unless I can find
something else, they may not even be connected,
but I find the overlap hard to miss.
But to be clear, checked or checked this
shekel dynamic, that is connected to Secure, which
is now being used with Twitter.
Now lastly, before we in case we forgot,
it's already happening. So we now you have
another entity, which I do find there are
connections to Israel, but there's a lot of
connections to major global entities. But, you know,
it doesn't always have to be compromised, but
I would argue Israel's intentions in most ways
of you of finding these connections are in
some way to use it for their agenda.
Same with The United States, by the way.
It's not hard to see. You can make
similar arguments with Russia and China. That's how
these entities act. My point is you have
Secure now with similar connections
being set up to roll out digital identity
and verification,
but I argue more in the direction of
digital ID and the currency dynamic.
Whereas this,
showing you I just did this today, guys.
It's still there. I I mean, do it
for yourself and let me know. Go through
the impersonation part of it. Go to report
a tweet. I mean, I can just do
it really quickly, actually.
I'll come back to this tweet, by the
way, and I'll show you. This is from
iconic
seven seas. But if you go here and
try to report a tweet, any tweet you
wanna find, and just go to or is
it up here?
Report report post. K? Go down to I'm
I'm sure you'll find it with others. This
is the one that I accidentally went through
for a different reason. Impersonation,
hit next, and then hit somebody else or
pretending to be me. That's what I did
last time. Next. Okay. Then it says you
need to go to this form. Okay. Hit
the form, then it says I need I
I'd like to report, and I put per
so personation on x.
Next one says, is it you know, the
choices hit me or someone I I am
authorized to represent or or the I think
it's both or my company. That's the one
I did last time.
Or maybe that's the only one.
Yeah. So then hit my my company, brand,
organization.
Scroll down, auto check, which make sure you
unclick before you accidentally hit verify, and it
says Authentix right there. I'm very look at
that. Look. You see how I just clicked
on? Stupid thing is trying to get me
to click this.
I wanna know if you got Stripe. I
showed you somebody else that did the same
thing, and they got presented with Stripe. How
does that make sense? Maybe geographically,
regional?
Something tells me it's more than that, though.
But remember, guys, this is not supposed to
be the case anymore.
They
Elon publicly said, I hear you. We're gonna
go to Stripe instead. That, by the way,
groups like Odysee now are getting rid of
Stripe and aren't scooping up your data and
using it to train models. Like, that's that's
the direction we should be going in. The
point here, guys, is that's a problem.
That is obviously an issue. That is an
Israeli intelligence entity that, as it says, is
scooping up your data, your images, and your
extracted
biometric
data.
How is anybody okay with that? And especially
since he lied about it and it's still
being used.
Where is the other one?
So just include this to check out. This
is censored man who broke this a long
time ago. Myself at a similar time, I
was calling it out, but he got a
lot of attention for it. But seems to
not wanna talk about it anymore, which I
find interesting,
even though it never stopped.
And seven seas from the iconic group, almost
ten years ago, the World Economic Forum revealed
the method, a blueprint for digital identity.
Now you've got the rebel fight in the
deep state rolling out the digital ID plan
for the deep state.
It's a good thread. It shows you the
very basic walk along here, and you can
walk and see how they're doing it all
right now.
So, obviously, this dovetails with the larger direction.
Right? So if we're being forced into this
technocratic
bio AI biocontrol structure,
obviously, they need artificial intelligence. Right? And this
is the point we keep highlighting. I just
showed you this. Daily v, Steven, bright leading
platform, says new leak reveals Musk's crony's plot
to revamp the federal government using AI, which,
by the way, is what the whole efficiency
movement was really
that will overlap that with the origin of
technocracy, by the way, that Derek points out.
I'll read it in a second. But the
old efficiency push with
by the way, which all they really did
was rechange the name of The US digital
services because that's where it's going. They can't
even hide this
because and that get that's a way they
kind of got away from any legal challenges
because they know what they're doing. They're very
carefully crafting their their direction here,
and it's obvious to me.
But AI is a central part of where
this all goes. And I was gonna highlight
again what he what the what they actually
said in this.
And this is a leaked tape, remember. They
don't think they were gonna hear this. And
this is just like the or this was,
yeah, just saying
yeah. The basically, to sum up what that
paragraph says, the login part of it and
and to kind of centralize a lot of
the information to make that more efficient. Right?
But, of course, the issue was, well, that
there's a privacy issue there. What you're doing
circumvents a lot of privacy issues for average
people. Right? And they say they said it
flagged the privacy act, which keeps agencies from
sharing your personal information.
Here's what he said.
I think we are on the topic of
login aggregation data.
It's an illegal task. That's the employee still.
The privacy act forbids agency sharing personal information
without consent. Yes. Here's what they said.
She had responded by simply brushing the concerns
aside, stating the government will try to get
consent,
but that shouldn't stop them from moving ahead
anyway.
This is what they actually think. This is
the current administration.
Frankly, no different than Biden's.
But right now, that's what we're at. So
for you pretending like this is not happening,
they keep showing you due process later. Take
the guns now. Burn the flag. Go to
jail. Their your rights don't matter. Oh, you
say a bad thing about Israel, you'd be
deported.
And, yes, if you for don't if you
forgot our show, that did include American citizens.
There's a very clear carve out for that.
And it says things are going to get
insane. If we hit a roadblock, then we
hit a roadblock. But still, we should push
forward to see what we can do. They
are looking at your rights as a hindrance.
And if you simply don't say anything about
it, they'll run right over the top. That's
AI
in lieu of your rights.
And dare cover the Stargate project. Trump partners
with tele technocrats to promote mRNA injections.
Very real. It's amazing how that still gets
ignored by a lot of the where are
all the Republicans screaming about that?
AI and transhumanism.
Stargate project. That's where this is going.
And this we're gonna show you in a
many different ways. We already did the AI
infrastructure road map. Here quickly is Oracle CEO,
Safra Katz,
vowing and don't that's why I want you
to see that. Don't forget.
Larry Ellison.
So you have SoftBank, which, again, it's not
even a a a hyperbolic statement. That is
real, guys. That is they are completely in
they are funding the venture the startup nation
of Israel start Israeli intelligence entities. And he
that's the
it's basically the financial part of the Stargate
and also the c e the kind of
chairman running the whole thing. That is real.
That's not hard to see. Then you got
Larry Ellison from Oracle right there. And then
you got Sam Altman from OpenAI and Chad
GPT. We'll get to in a second, which
Elon now is trying to buy. What did
we tell you?
Funny how constantly we keep saying
amazing how many things we can basically,
you know,
surmise and put out there way before they
ever happen, and yet still we get relegated,
you know, which is just crazy how many
things we can be right about well before
the conversation and get very little attention for
it. But the point being, Larry Ellison Oracle.
Now this is Oracle. K? And that he
is the one of the chief elements of
what's going on with that. Here is the
current CEO telling you what she thinks of
Israel. Really, remember the group that's currently committing
a genocide, the world is obviously seeing.
How important
Israel is
and what the difference is between good and
evil,
and we pick good.
Really Good and evil.
They're evil.
Yes. And what the difference is between good
and evil,
and we pick good.
I shouldn't make fun. I just you know,
I I frankly think that people like this
are put there
because they're not really in charge. Now that's
that's a completely
just gut feeling.
I I'm probably not completely wrong. My point
though is that you get a lot of
these circumstances where you look at them, like,
is that is that person even very smart?
Like, if you're talking about feelings and and
good and evil when I mean, you're talking
about a group that the world can see
committing horrifying crimes, and I've been very clear
for a long time.
And good and evil is the way you
frame that? Well, yeah, I agree, except you're
you're framing the genocide committing, laughing about children
dying, lying about atrocity propaganda, killing your own
people government,
and acting like they're on the good side
of this.
And I just frankly think the way she
presents that makes it sound like she's very
not very informed. But either way,
this is the person that's at least stay
listed as the CEO in charge of this
company that is rolling out a massive AI
infrastructure that's going to be built around you,
that Israel is financially
basically running, it seems.
Period.
And
good.
Period.
And
put on our website.
We stand with Israel,
not only on our Israeli website or even
on our American website,
but are on our websites around the world
in local language.
And as you know, we operate in a
lot of countries.
There is
no one,
no tech community in the world more adaptable,
more incredible
than this one. And I'm telling you now
that those of you who are worried
that capital
will not invest in Israel
because of this or because of that,
don't worry.
And, you know case you're just in case
you're wondering what she's skipping over with this
and that, you know, rape and torture and
genocide, you know, because of this or that.
You don't think she knows exactly why she
brushed over this and that?
All these little criticisms.
No. It is having an effect, but the
point is most of them are either influenced,
blackmailed, bought off, or threatened by the people
who have an interest in carrying out rape,
torture, murder, and genocide.
Clearly,
because people like this don't care, which I
find hard to believe. But my point is
it is actually drifting
very rapidly away from their support. They've been
losing a lot because of it,
but this is the person in charge of
this company.
The capital
will not invest in Israel
because of this or because of that,
don't worry.
And you know what?
We're
gonna
win.
Oh, good. Good. Who do you think she
means when she says we?
Oracle? Well, why would she frame it as
a win?
Clearly, she's framing it as Israel. That is
a person in charge of a massive
data collection effort, and far more than that,
that's rolling out an AI prison around your
life right now.
And they're gonna win.
Well, don't forget,
Whitney wrote this, 2020, Google and Oracle to
wander Americans who get Warp Speed's COVID vaccine.
And now we see how it all comes
together, you see, because this now, even though
we never got to see that data, that's
the pharmacovigilance
with and Oracle, and then we they've they
never showed you this. Now that's what they're
using to train the models on. He already
told you this. We're using this big
database of health information.
That's the one step. That's the whole that's
we this is all of it. It's all
this is all about the controlling and framing
and machine learning of this entire thing. And
if you can't see now, this comes from
then to now. This is during Trump's last
administration
where they rolled this out, then Biden carried
through another
second rolling out the second part
using that data that we don't get to
see that proves they know they killed everybody
to train these models as well as whatever
else you put out there.
How are we missing this?
Now we covered this on the seventh, February.
The technocratic coup is underway and highlighted a
an important report from Catherine Austin Fitts where
she didn't mince words. She said, this is
a coup.
A technocratic coup is happening
and went through all the information of Donald
Trump's administration.
It's possible to miss.
And even including what they're doing financially with
the treasury, which she laid out very clearly.
If you understand the way this works, they're
basically consolidating control in the very people you
think that you're you're stopping,
the the central bankers and the fed. That's
what's happening right now. Now that's why they
float the Ron Paul fed point, which I'll
highlight in a second, which
I'll I'll give you both thoughts. I frankly
don't think will happen the way he lays
it out anyway.
The reason they floated them before they got
selected because they ultimately wanted you to think
that was going to happen. But this is,
I think, what we have to consider at
the very least that we're watching this take
play out.
You know what I think is really truly
behind this?
But either way,
how do we not at least of all
the things we've concerned ourselves with, rightly so,
over the last eight years even,
have we not at least stand back and
go, well, okay. Wait. You know, every part
of what we were fighting is now happening
in a different way.
And we're okay with it though because they
tell you
narrative. And you know what? Maybe they're right.
But the amount the lack of of
highlighting this, the lack of coverage on it
from the specifically, that side of the conversation
is really unnerving.
But it's the same thing we saw during
COVID in the left, guys. It's the same
thing. We see this is how this plays,
and it's done for a very specific reason.
Now here is now I I wanna complain
about this as well, this this account. But
the point is,
Elon Musk in the White House, which by
the way, there's a lot of things flying
around about all this, which I think is
hilarious. We're not gonna get into today. Elon,
it says, who Trump allowed to speak as
if he were president, says him auditing the
DOD isn't a conflict of interest because he's
not personally filing for the government contract. It's
his companies.
And I I agree. It says they really
believe we're this stupid. I mean, guys, this
is ridiculous. Now point before I play this,
and the don't lose the thread. The point
is obviously that this is a military contractor.
By the way, through Biden's administration,
so many different points expose how how
childishly obvious it is that they're not really
fighting each other.
That's the point is to make sure you
see that he is currently still involved with
the contract that are building out the satellite
structure, that are building out the AI. They're
building all this stuff,
and there's not a conflict of interest. It's
insane. But what I wanted to highlight though
is, you know, I'm not I'm not really
familiar with this account, but I can very
clearly look at the account and see that
mostly, like, the very partisan account. So it's
I wanna make sure I reiterate this even
though I shouldn't have to.
That just because you share something from somebody's
account does not mean you support that account,
does not mean that you believe in everything
they say. Like, that seems like a really
crazy thing to assume.
I don't frankly really half the time, like,
I like, I even made the point with
CNN. Somebody said, why are you sharing CNN's
article? I said, because it's where I saw
it first. I find this to be an
honesty thing. And that's why I even he
even said, well, share an archive. I said,
well, good point. I'll do that next time.
But in this case, my point is simply
to highlight that it's about the information, guys.
If what's stated is accurate
or I agree with, then I'm gonna highlight
it. Doesn't mean this the guy's the best.
I mean, if I want if I mean
that, I'll say that. I just think it's
important because that seems to be happening a
lot today because of where these things are
going that we you know? I look. If
somebody has the worst things they've ever said
the worst person in the world that I'm
not familiar with and they say something that
I think, oh, look. Don't share that thought.
Then people argue that maybe somehow you're influencing
or working with that. It's not that's great.
Those are all assumptions.
It's all about the data. It's all about
the outcome.
So on that point,
the overlap here,
he is a contractor for the for the
military and has been for a long time.
Well, before Donald Trump's administration has top secret
clearance for a lot of different overlaps.
Here's what he said.
Have received billions of dollars in contracts
from the Pentagon,
and the president's directing you to look into
the Department of Defense if that's what the
Department of Defense are going to do at
at the president's request. Oh, and real quickly,
by the way, let's not forget Catherine Austin
Face has pointed this out. I that's not
gonna happen. I I flatly argue that will
not happen.
The trillions of missing money, are you I
mean, I mean, look. Let's this is why
many of us are kind of just out,
like, getting exhausted by having to play this
silly partisan game is the idea that guys,
you can very easily see if you've been
looking at this long enough and don't look
at it from a very narrow partisan lens
that it like, I've shown like, I'm gonna
go with USAID again. Donald Trump's administration just
the last time went through all of this
stuff, whether it's funding with USAID, including things
like HIV and tuberculosis, which they make a
big point about today even though he did
it too.
The point is it's both. It's your government.
It's all of it. So the the department
of defense and the trillions of missing the
black ops and the different things they use
it for that they claim is that's including
all of them. Goes back as far as
you wanna look. So if they actually started
digging into that,
if they truly did it, you would find
out that it is all of them, which
they don't wanna do. So you're either gonna
see a limited hangout like they're trying to
do with USAID where they carve a part
of it out and go, look. That's everything,
and then don't even actually stop it while
pretending they did, or they just don't do
it, or they transition into some new digital
infrastructure. That's what I really think this is
gonna be. And then as they do that,
they act. They just kinda throw out fake
information at you, like, with those from Twitter.
We found this. We found that. Well, half
the time, we find out that's not true.
Like, we'll show you again today.
So why are we pretending we can just
take screenshots at face value? Because it's about
partisan
games.
That present a conflict of interest for you
from the Pentagon.
And the president's directing you to look into
the Department of Defense. Is that part of
the business? Are going to do at at
the president's request. Does that present a conflict
of interest for you? Yes. No. Because you'd
have to look at the individual contract and
say, first of all, I'm I'm not the
one, you know,
filing the contract. It's Oh, okay. So he's
he's not the the administrative assistant just filing
the contract. So then we're all good.
Yeah. But he is the CEO of the
company that's taking the contract.
This is why that person they they think
you're this stupid. He gen what he's gonna
get is his army of morons out there.
They're gonna run out and defend this statement
as, well, he's not even he's he hasn't
divested from the company. He's still a part
of the company. He still absolutely has a
conflict of interest if he's doing things that
have to do with the very group he's
working with. Right? So if he's investigating the
Department of Defense for spending
and he's being paid by them for a
contract I mean, it's it's basic.
I promise you, you're gonna have to debate
this with very uneducated people or people that
know they're lying because they support him no
matter what.
Not the majority, in my opinion. People at
SpaceX or some would will be putting for
the contract. And I'd like to say, if
if you see any contract where
the the where it was awarded to SpaceX
and it wasn't by far the best value
of money for the taxpayer,
let me know. Oh, okay then. We'll just
follow-up and go, hey, Elon. That that's you
lie I I mean, that's really your response?
So and skipping over the part where you
are still working with contracts with the very
group you're investigating,
literally the definition of a conflict of interest?
Let me know, though. We'll figure it
out. Guys, I swear to god. Is there
are we really this stupid? I if we
find out that most people fall through all
of this, I I may just not do
this for the rest of my life. I
don't believe it. I do not believe that
we are this stupid. I just can't because
my god, it kills me to believe. I
have these moments of weakness where I go,
I can't believe this. Like, I go where
I fall if I do I if I
really believe that most people are falling for
this shtick, that are really believing that this
is what people I I I just I
maybe there's no point in doing this.
Now I'm not saying in any way suggesting
that's what's gonna happen. I believe in my
heart that most people are not this stupid,
that are not this gullible, not willing to
fall for basic I mean, not even a
shell game. I mean, it's basically just pointing
at the wrong thing and going that thing.
And we just go, okay.
I don't believe we're falling for it. I
really don't.
Here is the
very quick search. SpaceX has secured several
significant
contracts, and these are just for the DOD.
Remember, he has contracts with many different
aspects of the government.
DOD,
including $1,800,000,000
of classified contract with 2021
and $733,000,000
for nine satellite launches just in 2024.
One point '8 billion dollars.
That's incredible. By the way, that's related to
StarShield, a program aimed at enhancing US military
space capabilities.
What else are they working on right now?
Oh, that's right. The National Reconnaissance Office and
the spade the spy satellite network.
Guys, this guy literally is the bureaucratic deep
state over I mean, this I'm not saying
I'm that's as, like, a key as the
deep state. I'm saying if you're gonna overlap
what we think we know about these things,
bureaucracy, the deep state, the unelected power structure,
how does he not stand out as the
most obvious example of that? You can decide
for yourself,
but it's this kind of willful ignorance that
they're just rolling out the problem and just
calling it something else, and we seem to
be able to fall for that. Some people
anyway.
Star Shield could support various DOD applications, intelligence
surveillance, reconnaissance missions.
It's a lot. Oh, and then by the
way, who is the current CEO? Oh, that's
right. Elon Musk. So you just can't pretend
like there's not an obvious conflict of interest.
But but let Elon know, though, if you
see a problem, just go ahead and send
him a send him a tweet. He'll follow-up.
This is the Derek just wrote it,
December 5.
This is, again, during Biden's administration.
So they were already rolling out the infrastructure
for what Trump is currently doing during Biden's
administration.
Are we missing how obvious this is? You
can't hide Elon Musk and SpaceX are helping
US intelligence build the world's largest spy satellite
network. That's not his framing.
That's what they're talking about. This is the
not the, the director of the National Reconnaissance
Office saying, you can't hide now
because you're constantly being looked at. So is
the National Reconnaissance Office the rebel fighting the
deep state,
or are they part of the apparatus?
Okay. So if Elon's giving the apparatus the
power to see you wherever you are no
matter what, you can't hide anymore,
how is that fighting the deep state? How
is that pushing back? How is that a
rebel? How is that cutting the government in
half?
Have fun with that.
Now as Whitney points out the obvious part
here, if you think the deep state was
defeated
and all you had to do was pull
a lever for the right team and you
can watch as everything is made magically better
and do nothing but trust the plan and
enjoy the show,
you probably confuse what deep state actually means
with the wing of the unit party that
lost last year's election.
Mass complacency as a time at a time
of drastic disruptive change is not a recipe
for success.
Success seems crazy that we even have to
say these things out loud. I I want
to believe that most people agree with this.
Vigilance and scrutiny matter
as does taking responsibility for your own life
and community
instead of placing all your hope for a
better life in a world and a government.
Many of the people who used to to
distrust the system
the most and who also have most of
the citizen held weapons
have been led to believe that they can
fully trust everything happening and can let their
guard down against tyranny.
They may not physically come for your guns,
but they can still attempt to cognitively disarm
the American people.
So I also find the narrative that deviating
from the trust the plan stance is deemed
blackpilling.
And as peddling,
paralytic hopelessness,
very telling
as it frames, quote, trusting the plan as
the only solution for facing the problems of
today.
Isn't that interesting?
Even though I do offer solutions that I
think are helpful, I am still often told
I offer none because trust the plan is
not one of them. If trusting the plan
is the only way to be considered an
optimist or solution minded person to you,
the scope of solutions you are willing to
consider is both extremely myopic and q flavored.
But I again, I did like I think
most people would agree with that. Tell me
if I'm wrong.
Now Derek put out an excellent article
on the February 10 entitled meet the Peter
Thiel acolytes in Donald Trump's second administration.
Now this this is important because this is
what we've been Teel is only one aspect
of this, but it it's very clear how
all this has come together. And this spans
more than one administration, guys.
This is February 10. It says, Peter Teel
is an the infamous cofounder of Palantir, the
private surveillance firm with a long history of
involvement and collaboration with the CIA.
You know, the same CIA that
Alex and others have just went on a
terror talking about how this is the people
trying to kill Trump. The same CIA, though,
that Trump just called for. They said we
need to get them involved now.
The same CIA that
RFK Junior said killed his uncle, and we're
supposed to pretend like there's not a problem
there. Clearly, there's a bit of confusion here.
But the game is
say whatever they need to say to keep
people in line with the plan. You know,
maybe if Alex Jones make a very screaming
video tearing his shirt off, we can get
people distracted enough to stop focusing on the
technocratic new world order that they're rolling out
with the Zionist
I mean,
everything they pretend that they've been covering, it's
just it's embarrassing.
But he says Thiel is also a steering
committee member of the Bilderberg group, the infamously
secretive group which represents the interest of the
hidden ruling class. Now in the second Trump
administration,
Thiel's influence is more visible than ever
as numerous associates and acolytes of of his
are set to play various
influential roles. Now whether or not you think
Thiel's a problem, this kind of individual
influence, like we saw with Obama or Biden,
is the same thing,
It's a problem. Right? Well, you could agree
with that, but it's I guess we can
only agree when it's a group we don't
like or a side that we wanna disagree
with. If you stand back and look at
this without a political lens or a partisan
lens,
it's the same point. You have one group
that seems to be able to financially
influence positions
for their benefit.
That's what matters. Right? So here we are,
and this is exactly what we can see.
Here is just Peter Thiel saying how he's
gonna support Trump in every possible way in
regard and what he says is he didn't
end up funding his campaign this time, but
helped him in every other possible way, which
I think is much more important, frankly. And
it says despite his years long embrace of
Donald Trump, it is also worth noting
that Thiel collaborated with the Biden administration in
2021.
He reported on how the Biden administration was
receiving criticism
for continuing Trump's plans for a border wall
in the form of virtual or biometric wall.
As always, the coordination that gets framed as
difference,
you know, as the Biden's not he's anti
Israel. No. No. Not at all, in fact.
Aggressively, he called himself a Zionist. I've heard
Trump say that. And, also, very clearly funded
them extremely, but the game is he didn't
do enough.
This we'll get to that more in a
second. But here, the point is that biometric
wall,
well, they both called for that. We said
it with Kamala as well, but we wanna
pretend like that's them disagreeing. But it says
one of the contractors for the virtual wall
was Anduril
Industries founded by Trump donor, Palmer Luckey, with
funding from Peter Thiel. And Andruil being the
overlap of both Palantir and the the
basically, what they're building out with Lonsdale and
Pete and Karp and they're all they're those
two get referenced more than anything.
The message was clear. Whether with Trump, Biden,
nor Harris, the US is getting a biometric
surveillance state with digital IDs.
This is one of those points that we
bring this up with Trump supporters. They simply
respond, like, he said he's not gonna do
that. End of story.
Okay.
Remember that, guys. Remember that when this comes
to pass. I hope I'm wrong. Because when
it does,
then those people are gonna try to tell
you why it's not the same thing and
or eventually why it was always needed because
we're fighting the deep state. And that's the
only way to expose them. Watch.
Fast forward to 2025. And now that Trump
and Vance are occupying the White House, numerous
Thiel affiliated companies are expected to see a
big boost in financial revenue.
For example, recently, Thiel's Palantir and Anduril, as
well as SpaceX and OpenAI,
we already talked about this, announced a partnership
on US military contracts.
The move marks the latest efforts by the
technocrats to replace the old guard of the
military industrial complex, companies like Lockheed Martin, Raytheon,
and Boeing, which I argue won't really ever
officially go away.
Just be in in kind of just fold
it into the new dynamic. But here,
same point.
OpenAI, where there are, you know, you know,
basically, Elon and and they're supposed to be
at odds when as we can see in
a second again that he's just trying to
buy it out. I think there's always been
more coordination here. And it's about it's shit
it's making you feel there's different things happening
when it's all just different fronts for the
same agenda.
The point, though, is that they've all worked
together now to take feet to field the
DOD contracts.
So that that even in and of itself
makes that point. Acting like, we're just a
multifaceted group of well, I think they call
them small tech.
Literally, things like Palantir, which is ridiculous.
But really, they're all one thing. If they're
all at one thing, kind of fielding this,
then that may be an illusion in and
of itself. Right?
Now the different people. There's more than this,
by the way, but just JD Vance first.
David Sacks.
I forgot how to say his name. Chamath.
I forgot to say the last name. And
others all told Trump he should choose Vance.
We talked about this. Right?
Thiel crushed it.
They all said you should do this. Elon
Musk also reportedly encouraged him. There's two points
to make around this in the next part
is that this is the way that real
stuff the you know, remember with the whole
cigar filled rooms and the Democrat DNC? It's
the same thing for both of them, guys.
The real decisions don't get made on a
stage where you pretend you're voting. Okay?
Thiel and Vance have an extensive relationship. Vance
claims that after hearing Peter Thiel deliver a
speech at Yale Law School in 02/2011,
he was inspired to pursue a career in
big tech firms.
He started as a junior investor with the
Thiel backed Maythrill company. They seem to have
a real thing for the Lord of the
Rings overlap. Most of it for things that
seem to be kind of, like, alarming and
evil, like Palantir and the rest of them.
But the point,
overlap here, is that he has a very
long track record of being brought up,
cultivated by Peter Thiel. Now it says when
Vance announced his run for Ohio senator, Peter
Thiel was there and gave him $15,000,000
for the campaign. So he's been cultivating him
the entire time. Now was was another point
coming up in a second. My point, though,
is that in this discussion,
you'll find that when they make these decisions
at their own little inner parties
or who will run or who will be
you know? And these are not things that
you decide. Now his running mate is something
they typically decide themselves anyway, but I'm talking
about all these decisions. That's how these things
really operate.
Elon Musk. He says Elon Musk and Peter
Thiel have been friends for more than two
decades, and both men received massive financial wealth
from their cofounding of PayPal.
Thiel was has also been a prominent investor
in Musk's various ventures, including Neuralink.
Now here is something that seven seas put
out from the iconic network.
People keep saying that Twitter is free speech.
Everyone should know that Elon and Twitter are
completely inundated with the Peter Thiel capital web.
Elon Musk first involved Peter Thiel when his
online banking site x.com,
not this one currently, that's always very clear,
was purchased by PayPal.
Thiel
was also also through his founders fund established
itself as a 10 owner of SpaceX.
Elon Musk's toy rocket company, it says he's
also been a major investor in Elon's other
ventures like Neuralink.
Peter Thiel also owns a company called Mithra
Capital, which looking into their client companies, owns
swaths of assets across many industries.
One that expressly sticks out is Palantir Technologies,
Peter Thiel's Peter Thiel's data intelligence company. On
top of being extremely intimate with the deep
state through CIA contracts and global spying,
more on Palantir Carbine. Carbine is the one
about the nine one call centers that's part
of the Israeli startup infiltration of this country,
has ties to Israel and Jeffrey Epstein. Multiple
examples from Times of Israel articles, Herets,
founded by Thiel and Alex Karp, current CEO
and co and and Palantir was filled by
Thiel
in the capacity that the CIA was a
front for them. They were essentially in implementing
the massive NSA spy network that was legalized
by the Patriot Act. Remember that they denied
up until then. The article highlights more on
pea on Thiel, Palantir, and Alice Karp. Alex
Karp very specifically stated that anti Semitic narratives
are stupid, overconflated, and dangerous, speaking very heavily
in favor of Israel's favor.
What you also need to understand is that
Peter Thiel is also heavily involved with JD
Vance, the current VP elect. And he goes
on with more. The point, though, is to
see how wildly intertwined these things are, which
that should concern you.
As promised, Trump nominated Musk to lead the
d the Department of Government Efficiency, which, remember,
was just renaming the Department of the US
Digital Services.
And by the way, that ends up being
the same acronym even. The United States Department
of Government, it becomes
the basically
USDS.
Right? The the the those services, the USDS.
That's what they're that's so this has been
planned out. While the idea of reducing government
waste and increasing efficiency
is an appealing proposition if truly what they're
doing, it should also be noted that Musk's
talk of efficiency
is reminiscent of the little known efficiency movement,
which predated the more well known technocracy movement.
It's right on the surface everywhere you look,
guys.
The efficiency movement sought to identify and eliminate
waste in all areas of the economy and
society,
and to develop and implement best practices.
Supporters of the movement included Andrew Carnegie
and JD Rockefeller.
Rockefeller was a prominent proponent of efficiency stating,
quote,
to help an an to help an inefficient,
ill located, unnecessary school is a waste. It
is highly probable
that enough money has been squandered on unwise
educational pop projects to have built up a
national system of higher education adequate to meet
to our needs if the money had been
properly directed to that end. So
realizing the Rockefeller efficiency technocracy element is what
they're rolling out.
David Sachs. David Sachs is most well known
for his involvement in the early days of
PayPal. Same old thing. Serving as the COO
with Peter Thiel as the COO or CEO.
Excuse
me. He is considered a member of the
so called PayPal mafia, a name given to
founders of PayPal who later founded the numerous
tech companies including Tesla, LinkedIn,
Palantir Technologies, SpaceX, YouTube, Yelp.
In June 2024, Sachs and, Chamath, again, hosted
a fundraiser for Trump at Sachs' home in
the Pacific Heights neighborhood.
The meeting netted the Trump campaign $12,000,000
after Trump reportedly said he would be the
crypto president.
It was this dinner where the billionaires told
Trump they should choose Vance as his running
mate. That's my point.
This is where the real decisions get made
about the directions, not what you want, not
the party. This is this is the kind
of reality that happens, whether it's Citibank and
Obama or the bigger picture behind that as
well or this. Now this is shortly after
his victory in the twenty twenty four election,
Trump rewarded Sachs for his loyalty by appointing
him as the AI and his crypto czar.
Just showing you where this was going.
In this position, Sachs is expected to greatly
influence the US government's policies on cryptocurrency and
the advancement of AI, which should be a
problem for everybody, Howard Lutnick. Howard Lutnick is
the CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald investment firm and
has become a vocal proponent of for Bitcoin
in in the last couple of years, and
you know our thoughts on that.
Lutnick is also an investor in the anti
ESG Strive asset management, which was founded by
Vivek Ramaswamy.
Peter Thiel
and founder fund and JD Vance's Narya
Capital also contributed to Stripe's thirty million dollar
founding round. Now what's point important to see
is this game they play where the and
this has been building for a long time.
If Thiel and then we wrote a book
in, like, the early or late nineties, early
'2 thousands about, you know, fighting this whole
thing, the woke direction.
Well, before it was even really on this
earth, this has been this is a long
term agenda in my opinion.
Very clearly did
many people are completely aligned with it, believed
it, fought for it. The point is, I
think the game is to come at this
like we're we're the anti, the thing that
we propped up to bring down. The woke
pronoun this is what we I this
is what was used to get you invested,
because it's easy to fight these things,
and then tear them down to bring in
place the new thing. And meanwhile, distracting you
all to think you're fighting the deep state
when all they're doing is shouting down the
things that they had planned to destroy. That's
just my opinion. So I think it's interesting
these people who don't seem to care at
all about this stuff are really and really
are overlapped with people doing these things and
other government examples.
But because he frames it as anti ESG,
you guys die. You I mean, you you
believe it.
At least, I'm not saying maybe I'm wrong,
but question it. Is it possible he's simply
framing it like that so you believe he's
on your side?
Lutnick is also part owner of a video
platform, Rumble, founded by Chris Pavlovsky,
to help build out Rumble's independent infrastructure was
what they did, the the, basically, the public
acquisition
or rather an acquisition, but the,
what's it called?
Went public. You know? When they when when
public's Rumble. And they they they framed it
as to help build out their independent infrastructure.
Following Rumble becoming publicly traded, the top institutional
shareholders include Cantor Fitzgerald, Vanguard Group, BlackRock, State
Street, and Rockefeller Capital Management.
Again, to build out their independent infrastructure.
Keep saying that. Lutnick was also formally a
neighbor to Jeffrey Epstein in New York City
and raised millions for Hillary Clinton's two thousand
sixteen presidential campaign.
We're all being played. Lutnick has spoken at
the World Economic Forum's various meetings as far
back as 02/2016
and as recently as January 2023. Well, guess
what? So did Trump, so did so did,
Malay and plenty of others, but we just
pretend like that doesn't matter now. At the
twenty twenty three WEF meeting in Davos, Lutnick
participated in a panel entitled
real estate at the turning point.
Sure seems like that's what they're doing now,
doesn't it? Jim O'Neil.
O'Neil
worked at two of Peter Thiel's funds, Clarium
Capital and Mithra Capital Management from 02/2019 to
2021.
O'Neil was the CEO
of Sense Research Foundation,
an organization focused on, quote, rejuvenation.
Probably know what that means. I'll show you
in a second. The Sense received,
s e n s, received its initial funding
from Peter Thiel in 02/2006 and 02/2008.
A fact that should come as no surprise
given Thiel's own interest in fighting aging using
blood of the young. Now realize
this is not a secret.
Every time they could spar up, there's always
somebody who just can't wrap their mind around
how very, very real this is. Peter Thiel
is very, very interested in young people's blood.
Now this they made a joke about this
on Silicon Valley, the show. It's very real.
They're literally taking transfusions of young people and
claiming it'll make you live longer. Probably with
who knows? The point though is that this
obviously sets up a black market for this
very thing of young people's blood. That's crazy
to me. On top of that, it's a
pretty eugenics and and there's so many ways
to take this. That's insane.
These are the people that are running your
government.
And my point is Jim O'Neil
was involved with that.
Whitney Webb recently wrote a detailed investigation
further outlining O'Neil's connections to Teal and how
his appointment
might be used the link is in there,
by the way. His appointment might be used
to stifle RFK Jr
if his nomination is confirmed. Meaning, so this
guy gets appointed to the HHS.
Right? Ultimately,
manipulates RFK Jr's outcome if that's the way
that plays out. I still I still get
the sense it might not happen.
For today, by the way, I think Gabbard
was confirmed, which is I didn't expect any
anything else. She's very clearly playing the game.
Ken Howery.
The connection between Howery, Peter Thiel, and the
World Economic Forum run deep. Apparently, Trump sees
those connections as a net positive,
which has been commented on. Hower Howery was
another PayPal cofounder with Thiel. All these people
are in his administration. He's The US Ambassador
for The Kingdom Of Denmark.
The pair also cofounded the venture capital fund,
Founders Fund, which we mentioned earlier. In March
2012, the WEF named Howery a member of
the Young Global Leaders Program.
Like most of the others, like Trump, like
plenty of others, like Gabbard, he is also
a member of the selection committee for the
World Economic Forum Technology Pioneers Program.
Jacob Helzberg
is an ardent supporter of Israel and a
former supporter of Democrats who said he shifted
Trump as was a was a result of
Democrats becoming anti Israel.
That's my point. Now this is the game,
guys. This is how I'm convinced people like
this know their that's not true. Or at
the very least, as Derek says, if it
is true, I guess it's because he believes
that they're not sufficiently obedient, seeing as how
they did vote to give the nation unlimited
funding in weapon stockpiles.
But I guess they weren't overtly obedient enough,
and Trump plays that real well.
That's crazy. Right? Or you can realize that
they know they're all on the same side,
and this is just about playing the bad
bad guy Democrat narrative to get you in
support of Trump. Either way, this guy just
is terrifying looking to me. He looks like
some kind of fake person. It's these people
are are concerning to me and just everything
about them. Bottom line,
all about supporting Israel as a US representative.
Helberg also is a senior adviser to Palantir
Technologies. What do you know? He's also an
adviser to Alex Karp. What do you know?
Funny how you can't stop seeing the overlaps.
Michael Krastios
worked for Peter Thiel's funds, the Thiel Capital
and Clarion Capital. He's also currently working as
the,
the House of Science Technology.
Then there's a couple of others to point
out, but Alice Karp as well, who's just
another cofounder of of Palantir, who's a very,
very clear part of this. Now I wanna
also highlight
that Karp was on the side of Kamala
Harris.
So as Derek highlighted very clearly, no matter
which way you spent
turned this,
Zionist technocrats versus Zionist technocrats. What it was,
guys. They won either that's the game that's
played,
assuming your vote even translates. But it says
Karp is also an open advocate for supporting
the Zionist movement. He's been aggressive about this.
Corbett
highlighted recently noted that in November of last
year, Palantir issued a letter to shareholders that
stretched the company's support for Israel's quest to
ethnically cleanse Palestinians.
And it says, we are one of the
few companies in the world to stand up
and announce our support for Israel while they're
committing genocide, mind you, which remains steadfast.
Karp wrote Palantir stands with Israel. Yeah. They
sure do.
They're they're literally using their artificial intelligence,
mapping out the program, using murder and genocide
before they use it in The United States
and the rest of the world.
Teal's Palantir
strategic partnership with Israel, January Twelfth Twenty Twenty
Four, well into the genocide.
That's what you're dealing with here.
Now lastly, and here's that clip we shared,
by the way, of
Teal being asked about Israel and stuttering his
way through a ridiculous statement, which shows you
that he's gonna always agree with Israel, which
is what he said.
It's it's insane.
But ending
and then by the way, this is literally
what he said. Look look again. I'm not
I'm not, you know, you know, with without
without going into all you know, I'm not
on top of all the details of what's
going on in this real big that's how
he starts. It's crazy.
But he goes on to say, in my
next article, I will dive deeper into this
into the role that Curtis Yarvin
plays,
influencing Peter Thiel and the MAGA movement in
general. So look forward to that.
Very important to see how this all plays
out.
Now
overlapping that with the media part as they
just highlighted with the rumble and CEO of
of rumble,
Tim Tim Hencliffe points out another great return
on investment for Peter Thiel. Check this out.
Chris Pilevsky,
CEO of Rumble, just walked into the White
House Press Briefing Room and sat down in
the new media chair,
which by the look. Regardless of my very
clear concerns about why how Rumble is any
different than all the rest of central platforms,
it's not, guys. I mean, how do we
miss that? Every same choke point, all the
same concerns. They just haven't pulled those rugs
out yet. Why wouldn't they? It's a crazy
obvious question. My point is either way that
I can't say I know for sure what
will happen, so I think it's still a
positive move. I'd like to see more than
just very clear certain leaning and, you know,
platforms that support one side of a narrative.
But either way, I'm not talking about censorship
wise, even though there are some examples of
that. The point is that I think it's
good that rumble's there instead of, you know,
or in in addition to whatever else because
it should be all of it.
But my point on this is the overlap
with what we just read as well as
this.
Elon shares this today or yeah. It was
today and says it's a meme. This is
really not possible to point this out loudly
enough.
When the media is behind your movement,
you aren't the resistance.
God. They're just so lazy with everything they
do. Now first of all, there's nothing
that's not true. Now it's a general sentiment
that I would agree with, and you if
if you have the media
that is it's it says basically when if
if the media is behind you, then you're
not the resistance. Right?
That's not that could be the opposite. We've
seen the media support groups that I do
think are being
in in order to basically create the narrative
that they're not.
My point is that's an assumption. You're you're
making a broad stroke. K? But it's a
general point that typically speaking when the media
is cheering something on, like Antifa, for example,
that's typically a good sign to doubt it.
But what he's trying to do with these,
like everything else he does, is make you
it you're he's turning you into a binary
thinker.
So now when the media supports it, therefore,
that's not the thing. When they don't, therefore,
it is the thing. This is what I
keep calling out.
This is engineered stupidity. You're being pulled this
is the Pied Piper of dumb, guys. He
is walking you into a path where you're
not checking sources, where you're assuming based on
binary thinking.
But overall, there's a general thing to consider
like we've talked about before. If they cover
it, it's the opposite today. Well, how about
we just consider whether both can be done
or question those things while considering all. But
the pointing back to this with CEO of
Rumble in the media room,
okay, I guess he only means that, obviously,
when it's one side of the media. Right?
Okay. So what happens when Fox and One
America News cover something? Does that mean you're
not the resistance?
Oops. No. No. See, because he only means
the media
democrat
because that's how stupid we are. All in
quotes.
I mean, come on, guys. This is just
childish level thinking.
Obviously, right now, with Rumble in that room,
then he'd be part of media. But if
Rumble or any through anybody else that's on
the right is covering them correctly as they
would see it,
same point.
Just stop falling for these games they're playing.
This guy is not on your side. I
it's just so transparent to me. That's my
opinion. But in everything he does, he somebody
who is tricking you or using lazy thinking
to get you to blindly support them, how
does anybody think that's in your interest?
Even if you agree with the outcome.
He's making you stupid by playing these games.
Stop falling for it or call it out.
Be like, obviously, that's not
could be the case. They don't want you
to think like that.
But here he is confirmed to speak at
the World Government Summit in Dubai
about AI and Doge.
Cool. Right? The World Government Summit. Isn't that
what we're all about? World government?
No. Hashtag winning.
But I guess we'll make up an excuse
for why this makes sense. As Derek covered
this before in 2022, while you were distracted
by Will Smith, the international elitist met at
the World Government Summit.
Guests included Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum,
which he does again, by the way. These
are all the same. This is the World
Government Summit.
But I guess it's no big deal. If
Kamala Harris was speaking there, my god. We
talk about it for a week.
Willful ignorance. Don't be a player in the
will for willful ignorance game. Stand up and
call it out.
And then as Derek pointed out in 2024,
hey. Look who else was speaking. Tucker Carlson.
Sam Tripoli points out an overlap that we're
talking about from before into the same conversation
of the bought off and influenced people in
his administration.
Ana Polina Luna says time for transparency has
come. Tune in to the press conference at
3PM.
Task force to declassify JFK.
And Sam Tripoli rightly highlights, why do we
need this thought, he writes, in charge of
releasing the JFK files?
She's a full blown Zionist, which is very
obvious,
and that's not a secret.
And the truth is that Israel and the
Jewish mob were involved in the assassination of
JFK.
Now, just to be clear, by the way,
what he means is specifically the Jewish mob
that Whitney's written about. The the mobsters that
existed in the,
prohibition type era that were specifically Jewish, and
that that's not like some some
current day slight or something. The point is
interestingly that that is very, very clear, and
we've covered this before. Oh, actually, I thought
I oh oh, you know what? I did
forget to grab it. That's right.
My interview with Corey Hughes about this. I
do think he does amazing research on this
that's really hard to deny.
Title of this interview,
was Israel behind the assassination of JFK?
And he says, so you so do you
think we will get the truth?
Seeing as that was Zionist is now walking
out the truth about JFK, and it seems
pretty clear that they were at least involved.
Probably not.
Okay. Let me see. I'll make sure I
save that.
I did. Okay. So next one.
Here's a video I'll play for you. So
this is for sure. My it's my solemn
duty to begin to to form a new
relationship with the government and the governed. We'll
uncover the truth about JFK, RFK, MLK. Like,
really? Annie Epstein files? Look at look at
what she laid out.
RFK, RFK, MLK,
Epstein, UFOs,
nine eleven, and the origins of COVID nineteen.
My god. It's a conspiracy
trifecta or more than that with more than
I mean, guys, this is the same game
as and here by the way, two points.
Same game as before with Trump.
But ask yourself, why is the game still
being played
after the election?
Somebody made that point earlier with so they're
still advertising on TV about support our agenda
well after the election took place. That seems
pretty strange to me. I get the sense
that's because they don't have as much support
as they're projecting.
But this is them pushing this, like, end
of ed, lock her up, and all the
different things they tried to tap into. They
said all this last time. Nine eleven, he
brought Trump brought all these things up. None
of it happened.
So now JFK, which I think we all
can acknowledge was Israel and the CIA. We
have MLK, which, by the way, a court
in The United States has already found the
government was was involved. It was a civil
court. Co Corpus talked about it. So we
don't need your fake information.
Epstein files? Are we kidding? Seriously? Which will
involve Donald Trump, which will involve a lot
of the people we're talking about. So it's
either gonna be a limited hangout or they
won't show it to you. UFOs. Come on,
guys. 911. All these things are very, very,
very clear. They're traps.
Or COVID nineteen. They're gonna pretend that the
CIA helped us or it's gonna be something
they stopped. It was a Democrat it was
a Democrat plot to release a fake thing
with China. They've already laid this out, and
it's not true. So here's what she had
to say, though, to start off with a
good here's some some honesty coming from the
new
whistle. What would you call it? The new,
the committee to release the facts.
What sort of,
witnesses will you expect to have at at
your hearings? I know you said the first
ones in March. That'd be department heads, former
employees of various agents. Would you like to
jump in? Yeah. I was gonna say, based
on what we're actually looking to do with
the JFK investigation, I'm looking at to actually
bring in some of the attending physicians
at the initial assassination, then also people that
had been on the various commissions looking into
like, a Warren Commission looking into the initial
assassinations. There's been conflicting evidence, and I think
that even the FBI at the time reported
some anomalies in the initial autopsy at Bethesda,
Maryland.
All of those, though, seem to have been,
rinsed rinsed and repeated in the media to
push a certain narrative that we don't agree
with. And so I think Wow.
I mean, honestly, before we even get into
the her this is pretty well grafted. I
mean, think about it. Now they're going to
bury you in a fake investigation
for four years about all these topics. MLK,
and they're gonna
revisit the evidence and
I don't I mean, really? You know how
much time you know how much is going
on in the world right now? What they're
doing and what I mean, even just if
you wanna pretend it's only half the government,
there's so much to go over. Or the
genocide they're both supporting or the many different
foreign policy blunders they're walking into, but we're
gonna bury you in this thing. Well, I'm
sure they'll bring back Las Vegas. They do
every single time. Now it's not even to
say there's clearly we covered it. There's a
clear story there, but not what they're using
it for. Where they trickle out some add
some new data points that don't change the
story, but the partisan screamers will bury you
with theories about it for the next two
months.
It's crazy.
Now, by the way, she sounds she sounds
like Laura Loomer to me. It's just funny.
All these people that seem to be trotted
out along these whether even people in his
inner circle,
I get they just they seem to me
like people that are complete lost.
Like,
well, just by the way, like KJP did,
the same dynamic before you jump to conclusions
about how we're partisan. The point is that
this is the one I keep seeing. It's
like we're rolling out people that represent the
the illusion
of the party.
Each time it gets worse and worse. Who
does that benefit?
Each time it makes the our country look
stupid.
Both sides of it. Both seem to benefit
somebody who has an interest in bringing down
this country. Now, what she is talking about,
bringing up all the old people. Right?
Oh, wait a minute. She's gonna be unable
to bring them to because they're all dead.
What do you know?
This person says,
stop sniffing glue, you clown. It's destroying what's
left of your tiny little brain.
I I mean, guys, that's just you know,
so this is my point. So that's what
she either didn't know that, which is pretty
embarrassing, or the point was that she didn't
expect Twitter to fact check it or anybody
else. And you're just gonna roll forward with
this kind of fake investigation.
I don't think we need this. I think
what we need is
accountability of what they're currently doing.
But Byron Gaines, to the point, I wanna
get this straight. A Zionist who changed her
name to hide her Jewish heritage is overseeing
the the declassification of JFK documents that Israel
has been trying to keep classified for sixty
years.
Got it. We will never officially get the
entire JFK file declassified. I think that's completely
the case. And you can see that she
she's a very strong supporter. I mean, and
that she's outwardly open about that. One after
another, we're seeing things that influence or interest
Israel be the
the the central role of what Trump's administration
is rolling out. The new Trump administration and
the technocratic Zionist coup of the United States.
The show is November 30. I think that's
where we are.
Now with the Ron Paul thing, scope this
is a point about
the manipulation of it, in my opinion, and
then show you some lies that I think
are just ridiculous and before we overlap a
previous lie and get into more USAID spending.
But here is Elon Musk saying, that would
be amazing to Mike Lee saying, raise your
hand if you'd like to see Ron Paul
as Federal Reserve chairman in response to Musk
saying, good idea,
to Liam Colt McCollum saying, Doge and Elon
Musk should let Ron Paul lead a Federal
Reserve audit. This is how this stuff is
done. This is so frustrating how this stuff
works.
Nothing's actually happened. It's far as the account.
Ron whether Ron Paul even wants this or
I'll show I'll get my point blast.
This person,
Liam McCollum,
who I where I forgot I forgot to
remember where he's from. Mises Institute and so
on. He says and then I thought look.
Ron Paul being involved at all, I think
is a good thing. I just don't think
it makes any sense in the context that
Ron Paul does not want what they want
in a car of what Elon Musk and
the rest of them. Elon Musk is pretending
to want what they want. So if it
truly came to pass, Ron Paul would say,
okay. Tear it down. And he will say,
well, that's not what we want, or at
least what we want is to rebuild the
same thing in a digital prison. And Ron
Paul will say no. That's what I believe
anyway because I believe he genuinely believes what
he's saying.
So he says they should let Ron Paul
lead a federal audit.
Okay. Yes. Right there? Absolutely. Because what Ron
Paul will do is expose that they're all
criminals, both sides of the paradigm, which is
what he's been saying for a very long
time and show you that it needs to
go away entirely.
Okay?
Elon says good idea, which mean I don't
think he cares. I think that's the same
just trying to show you what so people
look and go, see. He said the thing,
and we meet this means my 45 different
ways I extrapolate this out into everything we'll
do for twenty years. Or he just wrote
it so you think those things.
Crazy thought. I know. Mike Lee, of course,
who's clearly on the side of what they're
doing says, raise your hand if you'd like
Ron Paul as federal chair reserve chairman.
And here, the grift begins.
Oh, okay. So you want him to audit
it and then be the chairman of the
group that he has been cheering the end
of his entire career
or, you know, for the most part.
And the Fed, that's a Ron Paul okay.
So he's ending and the he's quoting a
response to something about auditing the Fed, and
this guy comes in and says be the
chairman.
Now look. I'm not saying Ron Paul very
well may want that job, and I think
he would because it might if he believes
it was real,
because then he could end it.
Like, let's be clear about that. That's there's
no mincing words what Ron Paul has been
saying he wants for a long time. So
if you give him the job, that means
the the the Fed goes away.
But not that that's not how this is
being framed. Right? And so Elon says that
would be amazing.
I just simply said, this is so ridiculous
for so many reasons, and it shows that
they don't know the audience they're trying to
court, in my opinion, or they're just trying
to confuse you. Because if you know the
audience that really believes in what Massey and
Ron Paul and others have said before all
of this, then you wouldn't be saying let
him run the thing that he wants to
destroy.
See what I'm saying? Like, it's it's just
kinda crazy to me. Now whether Ron Paul
takes advantage of this and tries to marshal
some kind of movement here,
good. I'd like to see him use that
because I think what he wants is clear.
I don't think Elon or any of them
will allow that, whoever the real person in
charge is.
Now two other manipulations.
I showed you this before. This is the
we are the media now process to claiming
things. Of course, we're kind of just joking
unless it becomes something we wanna roll with,
or Israel picks it up and turns it
into a real story, which is what we
keep showing you. So this comes out
from Mike Benz saying, Hezbollah is livid at
The USA shutdown. Now I I get the
sense he's trying to be funny only because
what he's highlighting is a guy named Nicholas
Ngo who's criticizing Mike Benz and saying that
the heart the USAID was destructive, shutting it
down, destructive and harmful.
And then he highlights that he edits the
voice of Hezbollah, which is basically a compilation
of Nasrallah quotes and videos.
In no way does he part of Hezbollah
or I mean, at the very least, there's
no evidence to suggest that.
So
and then you can see down here, it
just shows the editor of what it is,
and it lists those things off.
So I think he's trying to be like,
he saw this guy, called him out, and
so we just tried to make a snide
joke by saying he's part he's he has
blood and that's
which is not really a joke, though. You
don't make it out to be a joke,
and then it cascades. That's how this works.
I think I'm very suspicious of this person
like I am of all of them.
Then Elon Musk, as they tend to do
with 13,000,000 views, says the meme that America
tax dollars were funding both sides of the
conflict was real. Well, it actually is, and
you've all been using it for a very
long time. And this is a way to
bury that truth on a partisan one-sided narrative
and make it only about the Democrats funding
Hezbollah.
It's impossible.
But, of course, he was just kidding. Right?
Okay. Maybe. I pointed this out at the
time, and I said, well, that's absurd. And
this is Norman
Fenton saying, actually, US tax dollars only funded
the anti Israel side. All of the 3,800,000,000.0
is so called aid. Israel was entirely under
the 2.16 memorandum of understanding. This stipulates that
this must be spent on American made weapons
and defense equipment.
Champagne Joshi highlights. I've I haven't read these
by the way. I'm just looking at what
people are saying. USAID has contract with undisclosed
domestic awardee. Oh, we were just talking about
this one.
I'm trying to look real quick and see
if it's different.
You know, see, this is what frustrates me
about a lot of this.
What? You gotta show the current dates of
this stuff, right?
I'm willing to bet you that if you
look at the dates, like, I'm gonna show
you in a minute. Oh, here we go.
He's got it right here. Thank you for
sharing the link, Josh. That's why I like
your work.
We've interviewed in the past, by the way.
He wrote an article for TLF. I'll let
that load. This seems really slow today, probably
because people are using it, but maybe because
they don't like what's being seen.
My point though is you gotta show the
dates on when it's been done and when
it is currently going till because that shows
you who's still utilizing it. Right?
Right. So there you go. So we're gonna
get to this in a minute. Actually, I
think I have this one up for Ukraine.
The point is that it's still active, and
they're just simply harvesting what they paid for,
and that's been continued since the thirtieth of
this of of January.
So ten a week plus after their inauguration,
this is their move. So that's important. So
if you're talking about USAID continuing to work
with Ukraine, that's still happening. I've shown you
that many times. And I'll show you what
it means when just because it says zero
does not mean they'll say terminated if it's
actually ended. I'll show you what I mean
in a second. Come back to that. But
so the point was
the game with of Hezbollah. Right? So he
point this Mike Benz pointing to this guy
because he made fun of him or called
him out and then making it about Hezbollah,
and then Elon Musk making it about that.
Okay. This was on the February 8.
Breaking news, February 10. USAID packages found among
Hezbollah weapons cache in Lebanon,
says Israeli soldier.
Seriously?
USAID humanitarian packages were found amidst the cache
of weapons owned by terror group.
Guys,
an IDF soldier claimed. Now look. Look, guys.
With how much lie how many lies blatant
that have come from the Israeli apparatus or
individuals? It's obscene.
Everything.
Why anybody well, I know why New York
Post would run with a story based on
one Israeli source, which is not even journalism,
supposed to be more than one. But either
way, it's because they've they clearly have a
side in this. They've made that clear. New
York Post.
But one soldier
but let's just even say he believes that
or if it was they did find realize
that you're talking about USAID packages,
not even if you read the story, not
about weapons, just aid.
See how easy that aid could be moved
around from groups that still support right now,
the current government of Lebanon is very clearly
in line with Israel,
not Hezbollah,
which seems to be clearly controlling dynamic for
the most part in regard to, like, military
strength and so on, but that's not the
same thing with their government.
So either way, having a box that says
USAID does not mean anything.
The idea they're trying to extrapolate this out
and look. See? What they're saying is that
means Democrats
funded this,
Hezbollah, and Trump's fighting it. That's the way
they're trying to frame this. Even though I
can prove to you that the funding that
they're pointing to that goes in any of
these locations was wildly taking place all through
Trump's last administration
and will continue to now.
My point in showing you this is how
easy a we're just kinda trolling thing turns
into a real story when they just decide
to run with it, like Greenland, for example.
But it goes on both ways, by the
way.
Fact check, lead story says. Now here's funny
about it is if this was a fact
check about something that Donald Trump was wrong
about, they'd all go, you're taking a fact
check at face value, which, no, I'm not.
I check all these things anyway. But now
because it supports him, you'll probably be like,
we knew it.
Hypocrisy. It says Trump did not sign executive
order to purchase 2,000,000,000 doses of COVID shots.
Right? Now somebody shared this with me, and
I looked into it, and it turned out
to be it appears to be false as
best I can tell.
Now it's important to see this, guys, because
you have people on their side very, very
clearly trying to get you wrapped up in
whatever they're doing with all sorts of lies.
And the we are the media now people
are just over inundated with nonsense right now.
But the other side of it and I'm
talking about individuals here. I argue this is
just some random people that are obsessed with
hating Trump that decided to roll out some
fake shot and make a claim that he
rolled out this to to buy shots because
they know people like us will jump at
it.
Or, by the way, it very well could
be people support Trump that are hoping to
trick people like me into jumping to a
story we're wrong about. Either way, if you're
objective and nonpartisan, you'll find these things and
be like, whoop, didn't happen
Because you cared and you looked. Hashtag due
diligence.
But that's not true. But you know what
is true? Rolling out an mRNA cancer shot
with hundreds of billions of dollars of infrastructure.
That is true.
But I guess this might be a way
to bury that too, by the way, and
make his supporters go, no. That's a fake
story. Because they're so desperate to hide from
what's going
on. Now we just talked about this on
lies. Right? So those are misinformation points. Well,
here is a major one that got called
out, the god's economy story, which up until
even right now, by the way, there are
still people acting like that wasn't wrong. People
like the lives of TikTok got 10,000,000 followers
shares on that thing alone
by claiming that was happening. That's not true.
And I've said it because it's easy to
prove, and that he is forced to admit
that here.
Oh, make sure. Is this the one?
I think that's the one. I'll play it
right here. But so the point is mediator,
plenty of others highlighted. And this is today
or the over the I think this was
today. In the White House, in the overall
Oval Office, you had them fielding all these
questions with Elon and his son.
And Elon Musk admits he was wrong about
the Gaza conno story. And his response is
infuriating. I'll play it for you. It's
funny. Missus Musk, you said on x Yeah.
That an example of the fraud,
that you have cited
was $50,000,000
of condoms was sent to Gaza.
But after fact check this,
apparently, Gaza in Mozambique, and the program was
to protect them against HIV. So can you
correct the statements? It wasn't sent to Hamas,
actually. It was sent to Mozambique, which makes
sense why condoms was sent there. Yeah. And
how can we make sure that all the
states Okay. Watch note that Trump scoffs and
shakes his head
under the idea that that's why it makes
sense to send them there. Right?
And now just to be clear again, it
wasn't as far as I could tell, it
wasn't even condoms. It was,
STD prevention, which could include condoms, but it's
not just one thing. But if you look
at the actual contract, it doesn't seem to
be specific.
So let's just say it could be. There's
two reason that's important. But either way, Trump
scoffs at it. So I'm gonna continue next
to show you the many times there was
last administration that he funded the exact same
thing.
Hypocrites.
My condoms was sent there. Yeah. And how
can we make sure that all the statements
that you said were,
correct so we can trust what you say?
Well, first of all, some of the things
that I say will be incorrect and and
should be corrected. What a cop out. Nobody's
gonna bat a thousand. See, of course not.
Here's where you're gonna get all the sycophant
to go, everybody can be wrong. Well, guess
what? He wasn't wrong. He was dishonest.
The evidence was clear, so there's only two
ways it went. He either lied to you
or he didn't even look.
He took it at face value and shared
it. So that's something that you should remember.
But see, the sycophants who wanna scream that
people make a mistake aren't going to consider
that next time. They're gonna take them at
face value again next time and then shout
you down for saying he's wrong until it
turns out he's wrong and they go, well,
people make mistakes.
The reality is, guys, this is how they're
playing you. They knew it was wrong because
the data showed you that. I can prove
the overlap and the time. We already went
over this. You can see the share cycle.
That's why we just showed you the Hezbill
point. This started as something that didn't appear
to be real, then it kind
of ballooned, if you will, pun intended, because
they found some Gaza condom story. Libs of
TikTok and the rest of them were like,
look. That's how it connect. They're using the
condoms to make bombs.
And then it it ballooned again, no pun
intended or pun intended, into a larger story
that grew as they then made the claim
about why it happened. Right? Then Elon Musk
states that on Twitter and it goes out
of control. Then then this is more than
twenty four hours. Then Donald Trump stands up
and repeats it again. Remember that remember when
Biden stood up and and lied about the
bad babies at a time we all knew
it was a lie, and then they continue
to push it until later they had to
force they had to admit they were wrong.
You know why that happens? Because Biden's being
used. So now think to yourself,
when Trump says these things,
he's being used.
Doesn't that suggest that he's not necessarily the
one in control?
I mean, any you know, we're we will
make mistakes, but we'll act quickly to correct
any of it. They didn't, though. Not until
this very moment has he even publicly stated
that was wrong.
This is why if you're not insulted by
this, you're you're
I I'm trying to be kind.
If you're not insulted by the fact that
he just said we'll be quick to correct
even though you know for a fact he
didn't and he's been actually pushing back on
it,
then your team's more politics. Then you're in
this because you want to play a side,
not because an honest person will go, well,
that's not fair. You then that's not what
you did. So you're being dishonest.
And that is a small point. But when
you see a hundred thousand of those over
the last week over and over and over
and over, then you start to go, this
guy's a dishonest person, or you ignore it
all. Pretend like you're winning. States.
So,
you know, if if the I'm not sure
we should be sending 50,000,000 bells worth of
condoms to anywhere, frankly. I'm not sure And
here's how the game continues. That's something Americans
would be really excited about.
And that And and no one supports this
guy. That's the point. That's why they use
these things. That's absurd. That's literally ridiculous for
people to send that much money away for
any of these things when we have things
we need to deal with here.
And it also cripples these other entities. And
at the point we we talked about in
the last show was that most of them
are saying, look, we don't need your aid.
Stop pretending like you're doing this for us.
So this is all a game, a means
to an end. So that's how they're using
that. But realize, again, the condoms point was
just him extending it so they're gonna go,
well, they went somewhere, but I don't think
they did either. That is really an enormous
number of condoms when you think about it.
And I'll remember, guys, the point well, actually,
I'll wait to read them. If you read
the breakdown on this, it's absurd to pretend
that's the case. The actual data shows you
that the amount they spent it was I
think it was 60,000,000
they spent on just condoms for the entire
program for an entire year,
world around. And now they want you to
believe that 50,000,000 went just for condoms to
one location. It's just absurd. I we are
being played, guys, and the data shows you
that.
But, you know, if if it if it
went to Mozambique instead of Gaza, I'm like,
okay. That's not as bad, but still, you
know, why are we doing that? Why why
is it not as bad?
Because you've just decided to make oh, because
Israel. I got it. I'm I forgot.
Gosh. Crazy to me. Now he he now
he
does this
and tweets the video and says 50 millions
of dollars of condoms is a lot.
And now the game continues. Was he joking?
Well, no. He's just extending the lie. That's
how this tends to work. And so that's
his keeping his promise of not doing that.
Well, here's the drop site news that put
this out on the twenty ninth, and it
says, turns out The United States did send
$50,000,000
for STD prevention
to Gaza.
Eighty Three Million to be exact. Just so
happens, it was sent to province of Gaza
and Mozambique.
They know this, guys. And it says the
country located in the Southeastern Coast Of Africa,
Hamas and Gaza and Palestine, did not receive
$50,000,000 worth of condoms from that from the
grant like president Trump suggested today.
In that process, we identified and stopped
$50,000,000
being sent to Gaza
to buy condoms
for Hamas.
Fifty million.
And you know what's happened to them? They've
used them as a method of making bombs.
Oh, so where did that part come from?
So if this was an honest mistake, then
how did you then combine the Libs of
TikTok narrative with the idea of condoms making
bombs from a Adams of Israel article that
clearly got pushed through the Israeli apparatus. Are
we are we just gonna ignore how obvious
that is? If it was a mistake, you
wouldn't have jumped into why Hamas uses them.
Obviously, we're being used here, guys. I mean,
this is ridiculously clear.
How about that?
Okay. Well, here was the actual tweet, by
the way, that this person put out saying,
you know, he found the grant, and you
can look at it for yourself. It's right
here. And if you read it, it does
not explicitly state. I mean, I'll just get
into the actual breakdown from the next tweet
so it don't waste we already went through
all this is my point. This is the
fact check on Twitter, and they still lied
about it while that fact check was public,
by the way, which we shouldn't blindly trust
a fact check. Nobody should if they're not
being ridiculous, but we should consider it and
question it for themselves. A drop site followed
up highlighting again, this is the,
Carrie Ann Leavitt saying,
during this pause, Doge and OV found that
there was $50,000,000 of taxpayers that went out
the door to condoms. So she broke that
story. Remember that. So that means they gave
her that story. They flooded. They went out
through them, then Elon Musk and Trump carried
it out. Their inner circle continued to lie.
They denied, denied, denied, and pushed back until
he was forced to say that.
How do you not feel what you're being
lied to?
Dropsite says the Guardian's Robert Mackey, again, because
Guardian knows you fake. No. It's clear that
it's true whether or not Guardian covers it,
Debunks Trump's claim planning to send these condoms.
It says not, quote, not a penny
of the 60,800,000.0
in contraceptive and condom shipments funded by The
US last year went to Gaza. In fact,
the accounting shows there were no condoms sent
to the part of The Middle East at
all.
And it says, in fact, it says it
puts one small one small shipment of $45,000
in oral and injectable contraceptives.
For the fiscal year of 2023,
the most recent for which data is available,
only about 7,000,000 worth of condoms were distributed
globally.
So I was even wrong on the number.
7,000,000
globally,
which I disagree with also.
The vast majority of which were planning funds,
89%, sent to Africa.
So 7,000,000 globally in 2023, but we wanna
be pretend that 50,000,000 went to one location
for one shipment. We're being lied to. And
Elon just keeps the lie going because
he's a child, it seems, and is incapable
of admitting he's wrong. Like we saw with
h one b, like we saw with censoring
people and lurching into some conversation about doxing.
Who is following these people?
I I mean, I just I need to
believe that most people out there are good
people. And if you're a good person, how
are you falling for this?
They're lying to you. And stop I know
it's hard to see it and to recognize
that. Just think about what's best for your
country and for you. The truth. Right?
So here's another example.
This is from February 10. He says the
Doge team just discovered that FEMA sent $59,000,000
last week
to luxury hotels in New York City to
house immigrant legal immigrants.
Sending this money violate the law as in
great like many, many, many things they all
do on all sides of the government, but
it only matters when they want to make
a point about it. Is it a gross
insubordination to president's executive order? Now on top
of this,
if it's against the law, then put someone
in jail.
Oh, oh, we never do that though. I
forgot. It's all about the narrative of fighting
the other side, when in reality, it's all
a bunch of bluster bunch of bluster. If
you were gonna go after the Fauci's and
the Gates and the Bidens, they'd already be
in jail because you're in power. Right? But
you're not. Just like not with Clinton, it's
all a big long term narrative. The point
though, it's a violation of executive order. Okay.
Right. So you confused about when this took
place? It says that money is meant for
America's disaster relief, and instead it's being sent
on high end hotels for legals.
Well, again, so he says, which I don't
deny. I I I believe I've seen evidence
of that in the past. What I'm saying
is
the only thing people are citing is this
tweet. Just like the last time when he
cited that they they fulfilled every single contract
no matter what to even when they knew
they were terrorists, nobody's ever proven that.
Nobody. That was a statement on Twitter that
still wouldn't surprise me. But don't we all
need facts? What when do we stop caring
about verifying
what people say in government? And he is
in the government.
It says a clawback demand will be made
today. Okay.
February 10. So if this was last week,
then that puts it square in Donald Trump's
administration.
So what when do we start? This is
the same with Twitter. How long until we
get past the point where we keep pretending,
like, bad things that happened are suddenly still
Obama's fault or Biden's fault?
I mean, at this point, we're well past
January 20.
K? Now we're at February 10. We're almost
a month into his administration.
FEMA sends this. Now look. I'm of course,
it's possible that FEMA did this because they
wanted to do their own thing, but that
is currently Trump's administration. They came in and
they grabbed the reins of everything. Right? They
put their people in place. They froze funding.
So if you're gonna be objective, you would
go, that's their responsibility. Now, yes, you could
say we didn't come out and say we
don't agree with this. They did it without
our response they did it without our allowance,
and we're gonna hold someone accountable. Okay. Then
trot the person out. Who's getting fired? Who
did it? What's their name? And how do
you know that it wasn't ordered by somebody
in your administration? How much you wanna bet
that doesn't happen?
How much you wanna bet one of two
things? It's either never happened or it did
and they were well aware of it. Either
way, it's being used.
Completely my thoughts.
February 10.
So here
is Western Lensman
that says same thing, February 10. On the
left, you got KJP
in a little zoot suit saying, as the
election neared, KJP assured Americans that no FEMA
funds were gonna be direct diverted to illegals.
K. Right. And so from then until now,
I haven't seen evidence of that. Not in
the bigger sense we're talking about.
Then he goes right. Today, Elon exposes
or Elon tweets
a bunch of text that we can't verify,
but let's go ahead and pretend he's always
telling the truth even though he just admitted
that he'd be wrong.
See how that works?
You're a complete infant if you think just
because he said it online, that makes it
true. You are the equivalent of our grandparents
reading the newspaper.
Well, it was printed. It's gotta be true.
That's you today. You are the left. You've
become the left. The point is Elon exposes
that FEMA is still sending taxpayer dollars to
illegals
just last week.
You mean under Trump's administration?
With with human control? I mean, how do
you even pretend that this is proving anything?
And he goes, yes. That was a huge
lie by the Biden administration that we carried
out. It says funds were diverted from almost
every part of the federal government to maximize
the number of illegals in America, which I
largely agree with, but it's not a partisan
game. And it says there also appear to
be significant funds siphoned from Social Security to
pay for illegals.
Okay. So if it's still going on, it's
your responsibility.
I just think this is how so a
month later?
A year later? I mean, how long are
we gonna pretend like things that keep happening
are under somebody else? I get it. It's
a it's a short time frame. It's very
possible that could be some Biden holdover.
But if that's the way you think, you're
gonna be played forever.
So let's show you some examples of funding
that very clearly makes the point that it's
not partisan. Now these were highlighted, but it
looks like they already went away. So we'll
just I'll try to remember what I highlighted
here. So first oops. Oh, man. Damn. Okay.
Good. That was gonna load. These are taking
forever to load for some reason.
USAID.
So first,
twenty eight million dollars in funding.
Just showing you the $20.17.
Oh, that's right.
Four.
So remember, Trump scoffs. Right?
Ugh, HIV
in Africa. What are the new cons for?
Okay. Which I'm not again, I do not
think that should be happening.
In two in USAID,
new cooperation agreement for USAID community
HIV and AIDS care and treatment,
four million dollars.
Twenty eight total. Okay.
Donald Trump, two thousand seventeen, four million dollars.
Same thing.
Donald Trump, two thousand eighteen, two point eight
million dollars Donald Trump, two thousand eighteen, two
point one.
Donald Trump, two thousand nineteen, six hundred and
twenty thousand. Donald Trump, two thousand nineteen, eight
hundred and thirty 800,000.
Donald Trump, 2 thousand 19, again, 200 2,000,000.
Donald Trump, 1 20, 1 point 5 million.
All for AIDS. Okay. So if we're gonna
have some big issue about these things
now I I I'm sure the the argument,
oh, it's just about specifically STD. No. It's
not. They are making a point about any
aid, which I am too.
This which by the way is what you're
actually saying. You're just gonna deviate away from
it because you wanna make it about one
thing. The point here is clearly USAID
funding
anything, really, foreign aid. Because one, it's just
simply a
a regime change
hidden hands. It's what they're doing it for.
But on top of that, you are still
using the aid for American tax dollars to
fund
HIV and AIDS care.
Same thing.
Isn't that hypocritical?
It is.
And then
this is from
same one, same contract, just showing you the
later date.
Here's my point from before. So what you're
gonna see, and these are the important ones
to follow-up on. So first, recognize Donald Trump
funded those things just like everybody else. We
just didn't talk about it then. Because now
they're in interest of keeping you in the
moment. The the the feeling that you're changing
for positive when really they're just using what
they've been doing to roll you into the
next control structure, in my opinion.
01/30/2025.
So same point from before.
This is
ten days into the administration. K? So these
actions are now being taken through
Rubio and their team.
And it says revision.
So the last funding was $600,000
in in October 2024. Now if this was
going away,
they would have wrote terminated.
But, no, they just write zero, which by
the way, as you can see, happens a
lot. That was under Biden's administration where it
says zero on on May. And then in
then in two three months later, they get
700,000. Right? Then in October, we're down 600,000,
and they do that. So it's sometimes they
just keep the contract going, but don't send
any more money until the funds run out.
Okay. So Donald Trump has and let's put
Donald Trump's administration and the USAID
state department
apparatus have now continued this HIV funding game
for
where is it?
It always doesn't say the location.
Anyway, to the point,
still happening through his administration, they've just continued
it.
Next one,
Department of Health and Human Services.
HIV focused population surveys in countries supported under
the president's emergency plan for AIDS relief.
So now it's even one step further or
removed even. You're taking surveys about these countries
to find out whether or not they're, you
know,
supporting the AIDS relief plan that would also
spend your money.
This one is a hundred and $94,000,000.
20 19, 10 million dollars from Donald Trump's
administration. $20.19,
another $10,000,000.
20 19, 20 million dollars. 20 19 again,
more 5,000,000 more dollars. 20 19 again, $81,000,000.
That's incredible.
That's why it's a hundred 94. That's for
HIV focused population surveys that happened all through
Trump's administration.
Same point, this goes into today, which is
revision, not deletion, just simply kept it zero
like Biden was as well up until now,
which is the 01/29/2025.
It's the don't forget, as I think I
I've showed earlier, we'll come back to these.
Where was it?
Right here.
USAID will simply be merged with the state
department, which is what they reported, which is
what Rubio said publicly, which if you remember
is pretty much how it's always been run
anyway. This is just admitting what's always been
happening. It's a it's a part of the
DOD that's carrying out regime change, what it
is. So they're just admitting it now and
pretending like something's changing.
Now, funding is definitely changing and moving around,
but the game isn't stopping.
Same point. Department of Health and Human Services.
This one is for the implement and sustain
high quality comprehensive
HIV cascade services for children, adolescents, adults
in Cameroon.
Same conversation. $92,000,000
in funding.
$20.19,
5,400,000.0
from Trump's administration. $20.19,
6,900,000.0
in funding. Twenty twenty, three million more. And
see how each time it says revision, revision,
and sometimes zero? That's Trump's administration.
$2,025,500,000.0,
all for the HIV programs.
Oh, I think I skipped this one. Oh,
you know what? These weren't loading. Well, if
you go forward
see if they'll freeze on me. Let's try
this.
There you go.
01/2925,
revision. So since they've taken control,
they've extended this out. It's continuing.
Department of Health and Human Services, Chicago Department
of Public Health, so this is local. HIV
Emergency Relief Project Grant, so that's internally. Right?
That's locally. One one we just showed you
with Cameroon. So it's it's but nonetheless, the
point is the same. And this shows you
that it goes back, oh, well, through his
administration, $27,000,000
and continues to today.
01/24/2025.
This one is USAID.
Rwanda medical supply.
Procurement
and supply chain services for USAID funded health
commodities.
01/22/2025.
Other administrative action. Right? So it still says
zero because they're still going through $12,000,000
in funds they got for the Biden administration
in 2023,
but they're still continuing it. They're taking other
administrative action.
So maybe they don't put any more money
to it, but this is not ending
the regime change infrastructure, guys. They're not doing
that.
USAID again, the gay agency that's gone, apparently,
$4,249,000,000
for Ukraine harvest activity.
And this is I think this is one
of the ones he was highlighting with domestic
awardees. There's a lot of these, by the
way. There's a lot, so it's not really
that sort of stand out. And it says
enable grain and oilseed farmers, including those from
marginalized and undeserved groups. Does that sound like
some kind of woke US? Yeah, guys. This
is exactly what they would all call and
rightly so a problem. Why are Americans funding
Ukraine Harvest Grain Seed Farmers like we're funding
Israeli? I mean, there's no reason other than
because you're subsidizing this group. Just like, by
the way, right now is happening here
with Israel and China and and or rather
Israel and Saudi Arabia and their hundred billion
trillions of dollars of funding that's basically subsidizing
the change of this country. We're being bought
out, and people can't even pay attention to
it.
And
01/30/2025,
harvest. So they're just continuing to cooperate with
the harvest of the things they help grow
while stifling your food infrastructure here.
Now here's a little bit of TikTok saying
breaking
USAID,
fully funded, Al Qaeda terrorists, Anwar, Alawaki's college
education in Colorado, according to the New York
Post,
which wouldn't surprise me, especially since if we
understand the reality.
As I said here, I'll just leave this
here, the verifiable evidence that the that Al
Qaeda is a construct of the US government,
all of it, and Israel. And and and
are you still pretending that Trump did not
use USAID for numerous regime change attempts and
still use it today?
Probably.
The point is, that's how this game works.
We are the media now is a very
clearly one-sided,
I would argue, basically intelligence even if they
don't realize that.
The point is these people, yes, probably being
funded through any number of these same things.
A national down for democracy, straight up CIA,
Israel front, you know, or that or all
of them. The point is that these things
are bipartisan
and have been for a very long time.
Donald Trump has been showing you that for
a very long time. And people like this
are not interested in the truth.
Now Bloomberg Equality points out an interesting overlap.
Donald Trump's advisers have discussed shifting.
So the game that USAID just went away
and was lapped up or just didn't care,
the people we just pointed to, has already
fallen apart. Because Rubio says they're repurposing it,
but now they're simply going, well, guess what?
We don't even just shave off that. We're
gonna actually shift the funding. Like I said
they would. Guys, the funding doesn't stop. They're
just moving it where they want it.
So discuss shifting billions in funding from USAID
to a government run agency due to be
headed up by the deal maker sign of
Apollo Global cofounder Leon Black, who you've heard
before. We'll point point out some overlaps in
a second.
The point here though is that we're talking
about a new thing set up by Donald
Trump.
Same thing we're seeing those before. This thing
that has to be reauthorized
by Congress coming up soon. So I I
I argue this is just a a shifting
of the same damn thing
from one name to another doing the same
thing
with the same money, mind you. Now Leon
Black agreed to pay $62,500,000,
he's no longer around, to settle Epstein related
claims.
Showing you a lot of interesting overlap, Israel
and Epstein, and there's something to be said
about that seeing as how
I think it's,
is it Ben? Ben Black? It's right here.
His son,
yeah, Ben Black, is now the one that's
supposed to take up the this billions in
funding shifting from USAID.
Trump advisers look to shift US foreign aid
to Wall Street ally. Right. As Whitney keeps
telling you, Wall Street is control. Is it
I mean, this is
this is business as usual, guys. These are
the players, the very people that they pretend
they're kinda pushing back on, the ones that
have created the world that we live in
are now
rushing to flock to Trump's side because they're
giving them everything.
President Donald Trump's advisers have discussed shifting billions
in funding from USAID to a government run
agency due to be headed up by deal
maker Sun, Apollo Global Management cofounder Leon Black,
part of an overhaul of how The US
wields economic power internationally.
Right. Because it's in the interest of Americans
to wield economic power internet. You know what?
I argue simply if we're talking about America
First, that's overlapping with their sanctions dynamic and
how they manipulate people using that power, which
is not what we should want. A new
approach would see reduced humanitarian assistance
and a greater role for private equity groups.
Ah, there's the there's the there's the, what
do they call it? The rub.
Hedge funds and other investors in projecting economic
might as The US competes for influence in
strategic projects overseas with China, which is all
really what it's about.
Or at least in the context of how
they're trying to, you know, frame the game
in in justifying with fighting the border. It's
it's all about their AI push.
But humanitarian assistance, by the way, is not
inherently bad.
I still agree that we shouldn't be sending
taxpayer dollars out anywhere. First, if Americans don't
agreed on that, which I don't believe we're
in a place where our opinions even play
a factor anymore. But secondly, when we have
things we needed for in this country.
But I there's plenty of people out there
individually that we're willing to be charitable if
they didn't pretend your government was doing it
when they're actually not. But on top of
that, the point is that when they say
humanitarian assistance, they're we're we're now thinking woke
manipulation or from other sides of it, regime
change tactics.
Just like sustainability and everything else become they're
they're bad words. It's just incredible how we've
inverted everything. We we when everything that people
think they know is true is false, then
our job will be complete, said William Casey,
CIA director. It's where we
are. But the point,
we will see the reduced humanitarian assistance
and a greater role for the equity groups.
So all it really becomes is a new
front.
So if we're able to acknowledge, not be
not in a childishly part one-sided view of
just the Democrats doing all this even though
we can prove Trump did it too and
so did every other Republican and Democrat president,
then we know it's a regime change front.
Right? That's what it is. So if all
we're saying is, well, we're gonna get away
from that fake front of humanitarian assistance, and
we're gonna shift it to private equity groups
that you don't aren't aren't allowed to look
into.
Public private partnership. So now they've effectively turned
their regime change engine to something that you
can't even criticize. You can't even investigate unless
you dig through their private information, and then
you could be sued. I mean, you see
how this works.
And it says it comes as billionaire Elon
Musk has been pushing with Trump's blessing to
shut down the 43,000,000,000
USAID, long the centerpiece of aid efforts.
Under the proposals, a chunk of money that
went to USAID, meaning the other parts continue
to go through USAID that's not going away,
would go
to the US International Development Finance Corps or
the DFC,
which was created
by Trump during his first administration
and given the authority to use taxpayer dollars
to invest in private sector projects
overseas
alongside institutional investors. So now you've got this
opaque
Trump created dynamic where they're shifting billions into
for private investing overseas. Can people say Israel?
Can we say
dynamics that are not in your interest?
How does anybody feel just because you you
tell yourself these people are good and on
your side,
and they're they're removing checks and balances. They're
putting things behind walls. They're showing you. They
don't want you to see what they're doing.
It's just sad how this isn't getting called
out. It serves as a source of financing
and as a deal finder, coinvestor, and an
insurer of risk for American institutional investors looking
to invest in private sector projects overseas.
They'll use the private public partnership dynamic to
hide whatever they don't want you to see.
Just how soon and, by the way, also
use the government side of it to get
you forced into it even if you don't
know the full picture. Now it says just
how soon the plans might turn into reality
is unclear. Trump, on January 31, nominated Ben
Black to be the next chief executive at
the DFC, Trump's creation.
And he still needs to be confirmed by
the US senate, which probably will happen, which
will continue to show me and everybody else,
hopefully, that there's not two sides to this.
Black and the White House didn't respond to
request for comment.
January 10, he coauthored a blog post, Black,
with conservative tech investor, Joe Lonsdale, because they
just can't seem to pull themselves out of
this. Everything you're looking at seems to tie
back the Palantir in some way, titled how
to dodge US foreign aid. Right. How to
make it more efficient. See, not stop it
all, but just make it work for us.
That called for shifting much of USAID's budget
to the development finance core. See,
It's all on surface.
They're just restructuring.
Much of our current foreign aid budget is
waste and should be cut, but they're not
doing that. That's what Lonsdale wrote. If we
are going to spend money abroad, let's do
so in investment driven model. Okay. So not
cut then. Even though you just said that,
let's just simply focus it into things we
like to benefit our company, of course.
For strategic project financing to initiatives, Lonsdale, who
has long been close to Musk and helped
establish his pro Trump America PAC, declined to
comment. Lonsdale was directly connected to Palantir. People
familiar with discussions inside the Trump administration said
the idea
laid out by Black and Lonsdale
fits with the plans now being considered.
What a coincidence.
It's almost like they rolled it out and
Trump followed through.
It also aligns with goals laid out by
the Heritage Foundation's project twenty twenty five, but
we're not supposed to talk about that. Now
it goes on to say Trump's advisers want
to use the DFC,
which already has a portfolio worth more than
$50,000,000,000
and pairs with US and overseas private sector
investors on projects
as a much more aggressive instrument of US
and economic power. Okay. So we don't get
to see who's involved in that even though
this is government funds. Now that we have
this overlap
when you when you're working with
public private partnerships. And we know that Elon
Musk and Trump and the rest of them
are completely,
aggressively,
either blind or influenced or compromised by Israel.
That's a main point that we can't ignore.
That's not some biased point. That's the reality
that you could see it. They're proud of
it, guys. So my concern is handing over
this kind of massive ongoing
slush fund
to some unaccountable
dark the deep state.
It's exactly the globalist, technocratic, Zionist deep state.
It's what it is.
It says they have discussed using this more
like a sovereign wealth fund and focusing investments
in critical minerals and other resource projects that
are vital to US strategic interests. Oh, minerals.
You mean like artificial intelligence, rare earth minerals?
You can't even hide how obvious that is
right now.
To pursue any of these ambitions, Trump will
also need to secure the congressional reauthorization.
My point again. So if all of it
hinges on this thing being reauthorized,
pretty sure that's gonna happen. And they probably
won't even make a big bunch of fanfare
about it even though that will be an
obvious point of how they're not really fighting.
It ends at the end of this year,
the the mandate. There has been bipartisan support,
of course, for reauthorization with bills to do
so, calling for this investment cap to be
raised. Of course. No pushback on Trump's pet
project. We'll want we wanna increase it by
a hundred 20,000,000,000, and then we'll slide over
all The US aid funding too, and it
becomes the largest invest I mean, think about
that.
They don't even need a black budget fund.
Now they just they just sits right there,
and they use it when they want. We
can't see for what?
Doubling the funds, essentially.
Given the authority to work in a wider
range of countries than the low income ones
is now limited to. Oh, okay. So instead
of USAID's front of only focusing on low
income countries, now you've got this massive
unaccountable entity with the authority to work in
any country, probably because Israel's interest is now
far more in the countries that are powerful
enough to put them to an end.
Now it says Trump advisers believe that they
can move funds from USAID
to SDFC without congressional approval, of course, because
the agency's funding comes from some from same
operational section of the federal budget known as
the 150 account.
See how they played this? It funds not
just the majority of US foreign aid, but
also the operations of US Embassies and consulates.
This opens the door to just unfettered funding.
And the reality is that they're he's claiming
because of the way they set this up,
they don't even need approval for anything. Like,
they wouldn't ask for it anyway.
They ought to keep leaning in and make
as much change and go as fast as
possible, they said. Right. Because that's usually synonymous
with what's best for Americans. Right?
Or more so with best for the power
structure.
Well, Jewish insider highlighting this guy says Trump
announced
he has been nominated Ben nominated Ben Black
to lead the US International Development Finance Corp.
It says, if confirmed by the senate, Black,
which I'm pretty sure he will be, Black
will serve as chief executive officer of the
DFC, which acts as the federal government's primary
lender and investor in development projects abroad. Sort
of sounds like their unit eight go to
start up dynamic.
Now it says Black is a managing director
of
Fortinbras Enterprises, a credit investment fund, and CEO
and director of Osiris Acquisition Company, which is
worth looking into, another investment firm. He was
a team member on the Council on Foreign
Relations, has other aspects overlapping with the Milken
Institute and plenty of other totally not deep
state groups.
Interesting. Now here's the article. That's why I
shared that. Down at the bottom, it says
this is the title. Same thing. It says
the DFC
was created during Trump's first administration,
the result
of the merging of the overseas private investment
corporation
and the development credit authority of the United
States Agency for
USAID.
Funny how in this Jewish insider article, they're
willing to highlight explicitly what we keep telling
you is happening, which is that they're simply
just blending these two things together. It's what
they said right there. The result of merging
this thing
with the endless funding of the unaccountable USAID
and making it even more unaccountable.
But don't don't let's pretend like it's not
obviously happening because Elon tweeted something different.
Well, Trump has been directed to release all
the funds
after defying last order. This is as of
the tenth. So we're seeing this back and
forth right now, which does show you something
interesting. It's hard to know exactly what it
means other than the obvious, like who is
pushing and what you know, whether it's all
a show. But the there was a judge
that ruled, and that's what Elon Musk made
this big tear about how he has to
be removed and impeached. Just showing you how
completely
dictatorial
these people are. I mean, you are acting
as an authoritarian entity. Nothing matters. Get him
out of the way.
Take over everything. There's no there's no
path there.
Even if you believe even if he truly
wants the positive change that you think he
does, you're doing it in a way that
guarantees it won't last.
But that's the point though, if you truly
understand what's happening. And I don't even think
he actually wants those things to be clear.
But either way, you're just simply running right
it's it's like Donald Trump writing five executive
orders to change everything, and the next president
comes in and writes five to change it
back. It's how dumb this is.
And even neither of them should be able
to send through executive orders, but, you know,
here we are. Trump directed to release all
funds. So that happened. He pushed back. Now
it followed up.
He he told him to freeze, and now
because things have moved, he said he's supposed
to release them. It says the Trump administration
must immediately unfreeze $3,000,000,000,000
in federal funds,
finding it, finding it violated his temporary restraining
order by keeping some of the dollars paused.
That was the one he rolled out first.
The point is they don't care about these
right now. The judge ruled. They didn't care.
So now he's saying, well, now you're violating
that. He says, boo state attorneys general showed
evidence that the administration is still refusing to
let funds flow
despite the federal judge's January thirty thirty first
order to pause the administration's plan. The Trump
administration must ask McConnell for permission to pause
funds in specific cases, the judge said.
That's that's technically the legal reality of how
Congress works.
So what's crazy to me is they're pushing
Americans to literally want authoritarian rule.
Surprise, surprise.
And maybe even ways that you agree with,
but it's the same point as always. It's
like you cheering on censorship because you see
a Democrat get removed.
It's very brainless to see how quickly that
will spin right around when you become the
one saying the wrong thing because the partisan
side of it is the way they keep
you in check. They don't care what side
you're on.
And so in this case,
you have a lot of people that are
cheering about this. Well, we know they're corrupt,
so who cares? Just don't listen to them
because we know you're doing what's right. That's
what a lot of people, even good people,
they're doing that.
So all you're really doing is saying, we're
okay doing the wrong thing if we like
why he's doing it. Means you're a hypocrite,
guys. Simple.
The pen is now pleading that they are
trying to root out fraud, the chief the
judge says.
But the freezes in effect now were a
result of the broad categorical order,
not
specific finding of fraud. That's a very true
statement.
Right? So they go, they're they're fraud, and
they just go freeze everything because
all of them are corrupt?
Again, that's the game. This is what we're
trying to show you. No. The the Republican
party was using it just as much like
Trump was during his last administration. So all
they really did was use the narrative they
knew you would buy, the Democrat bad, and
just froze. And they didn't phrase it though,
as I keep showing you. They've continued to
use funding like I showed you last time,
and I just showed you again. Well, no.
Today's were more about the one they've continued,
but they're still funding
fund that has continued
past the January 20
and has continued through all sorts of weird
things in this country and foreign aid.
So under the guise of stopping it, they've
allowed you to think that you're somehow stopping
the bad guys when in reality, you're continuing
the same illegitimacy.
And if they were actually finding fraud, then
they should expose that fraud and hold somebody
accountable.
But they're not because like I always say,
nothing actions. There's no outcome. Nobody goes to
jail. But if they do, it's usually some
lackey one person that's low wrong and not
the people that actually made the decisions.
But still nothing.
So yes. Just because the judge says this,
they're gonna call him some Democrat stooge. Maybe
he's Democrat. It doesn't change the fact that
what he said is true.
Now it says the administration must immediately clear
all hurdles to restoring the funds until the
court decides on the state's motion for preliminary
injunction, the judge said, which I don't think
they care about. They're showing you what's going
on right now, guys. We're in a very
bad way.
Now last thought I had on this was
interesting. So when I first talked about this,
my thought was, like, what are they doing
with all this money? We saw money fly
to Israel all of a sudden, $7,000,000,000,
1 billion dollars there, or 8.4 already in
a blink of an eye, on top of
the 38,000,000,000 over ten years they already give.
But what if there was more going on?
Because we don't know. Like, there's no accountability
right now. There's no checks. There's just Elon
saying things on Twitter. Right? I simply said
after the judge directed to unfreeze the funds,
I said, well, this is interesting. Right? What
if it turns out those funds were not
actually frozen, but simply reappropriated for a certain
ally or a different agenda?
What happens then?
Maybe what you're seeing now, where they just
pretend to ignore they just ignore the judge
and act like nothing happened because they can't
give it back because it's not there anymore.
That's it's just a thought. Of course, a
very, very, very, very suppressed thought that gets
very little reach. Usually tells me something, but
you guys can decide for yourselves.
So the point though again was USAID did
not go away, which I think is obvious.
As they were told you to be merged
with the state department, Rubio publicly told you
he's now in charge.
Play that for you.
Just in case you didn't see it.
Well, look, I mean, my frustration with USAID
goes back to my time in congress. It's
a completely unresponsive agency.
It's supposed to respond
to policy directives of the state department,
and it refuses to do so. So
the functions of USAID there are a lot
of functions of USAID that are going to
continue. They're gonna be part of American foreign
policy, but it has to be aligned with
American foreign policy. Right. So we just wanna
use it the way we wanna use it.
Pretty simple.
You're only hearing something different if you just
pretend he said something different. He's telling you
it didn't go away. We're gonna use the
way we like. And now we're just gonna
take the money that we pretend isn't being
used. We're gonna slush it over into something
speed some new public private partnership Trump created
last time that's being had by somebody that's
tapped into all the same problems.
Surprise, surprise. I'm pretty sure if you're part
of the council and formed relations to the
Milken Institute, you're not fighting deep state. Just
gonna put that out. That's that's Ben Black.
Played once again. Now just showing you that
what's always been a regime change engine.
And if you think that they've ever been
transparent with that budget,
I get why you're buying this. Right? Let's
not pretend like we actually really know. USA
spending does not truly show us the full
picture. I believe that. But here's what we're
seeing in the foreign policy overlap.
Springer Observer says the the name Gulf Of
America appears on Google Maps. Surprise, surprise. Because
Google Maps is part of the same technocratic
agenda. Like, think about how childishly small this
is. Who cares?
The idea of Gulf Of America, Gulf Of
Mexico, the point is some people in some
place of the world will probably make their
maps different, but because they control the technocratic
control structure, they can just do what they
want. That's probably what they knew.
They knew that they could make the Silicon
Valley dynamic, which influences most of the world's
techno technology
and websites and so on, could make that
happen rather than the context of, like, the
data they use for these things.
But it says officially updates its name and
instead of the Gulf Of Mexico, Gulf Of
America.
Why? It's a petty thing. It's a small
thing. It shows you the kind of people
we're dealing with. And really, what it does,
it shows you that what they think of
you, that they think you think that's something
that's important. I mean, it's I don't wanna
believe that most people are like that.
But I can clearly see that it's their
inner circle, and it's pretty sad.
Now here in Greenland,
you know, the whole thing that was a
joke? It was all a big ploy. We're
just trolling you, and you fell for it.
Well, how long until it actually becomes, you
know, like we saw with the other bill
they passed? Well, here it is in congress,
guys. And not making this up for the
podcast. It's called the red, white, and blue
land act of 2025.
They're either making fun of all of us
or these are some of the most immature,
childish people I've ever seen, which makes sense,
but we see from Israel.
To authorize the president to enter into negotiations
to acquire
Greenland
and to rename Greenland,
quote,
red, white, and blue land.
I mean,
that's just stupid.
This is
I mean, it doesn't matter. I'm just that's
dumb, guys. That's really childish. Red, white, and
blue land. You know what it is? It's
it's like calling it the Patriot Act. That's
how stupid they think we are. I'd like
to believe we're all bigger than that to
recognize how
silly that is. That's a stupid name anyway.
It's like they're speaking to you like you're
in a you're in some first grade classroom.
The reality though is that this is happening
and that neither Greenland government nor people want
this.
The president is authorized
to enter into negotiations with a government that
doesn't want this and a people that don't
agree with the government of Denmark to purchase
or otherwise acquire Greenland. Oh, great. So now
we're just writing a legislation?
Colonialism?
Naked imperialism?
So when they say no, what happens then?
We'll otherwise acquire. We'll figure it out. We'll
strong-arm them. We'll we'll do the old, you
know, what's it called? The economic terror the
confessions of an economic hitman. Right? Over these
years, we've manipulated them into many different positions
to now we can pull the rug out.
Now they'll be collapsing until they take our
deal, and they'll pretend like it all goes
away. You know, a thousand different ways. Or
maybe they'll have some kind of pop of
ice attack all of a sudden. No. No.
ISIS is in Greenland. We have to invade.
Got to. You know? That's how it works.
Freedom's coming.
I just
I'm increasingly frustrated with how I think most
people see all this stuff, and then we
just have to dance around. So here's where
it comes back to the a a AI
point.
Minor hopes, new Greenland government could revive rare
earths project,
or maybe that's what Trump is after,
obviously.
February
2025.
Rare earth minerals. Huge aspect of this whole
thing. Both pretend like that's not obviously what's
going on. Or how about Ukraine?
US Treasury's percent, Zionist himself presents economic partnership
to Zelensky.
And what's that about? Well, he visits Kyiv.
This was on the February 12.
That's today, written anyway.
US treasury secretary, Besent, presents a draft economic
partnership deal
and discusses Ukraine's natural resources.
The country, Zelensky, or the Zelensky said. Now,
the hegseth recently said at least stated that
they were not going to let them into
NATO.
Still highly doubt that's ever ever certain.
This says this is a concrete step in
regard to the
deal for their resources.
Adding that economic ties should be a part
of the security guarantee.
Ukraine seeks, Zelensky said. I am sure we'll
make the deal.
Okay. But, Sand is also set to discuss
efforts from Trump to bring an end to
Russia's full scale invasion.
So seems like separate things. So they're over
here making a deal about
mining resources. I'm willing to bet you that's
going to be a part of the agreement
with Zelensky to stop what's going on in
Ukraine to make it seem like Trump had
an end to this when really Zelensky is
simply a puppet force for US and Israel.
So they're gonna back down when they want
them to.
If you don't know this by now, you're
not paying attention. The reality is clearly,
I think it's about trying to manufacture this
control. I think it was about overtaking Syria,
which now Israel has control of, surprise, surprise,
with the terrorist group. They want you to
pretend it's no longer a terrorist group.
And now they're gonna use this to take
control of Ukraine and make sure the resources
in the areas that they want, like in
Donbas, end up in the control of The
United States. Sort of like the resources they
wanna control in Gaza.
It's all part of the same infrastructure game
that's being played right now. It says, percent
again, the bring an end to the the
invasion of Russia, they say, secure US and
secure
US access to Ukraine's rare earth minerals, in
which Trump has expressed interest. That's what this
is about. So they're gonna try to make
a deal to get Ukraine to back down,
but make sure that they have control of
certain areas. And ultimately, Ukraine will be backing
on what they said, which is they'll never
stop until Russia's gone. Okay. So they're lying
then. Zelensky's been saying that until he's and
then every time Trump floats
opposite. It's all bluster, guys. These games are
being played by proxy elements, like Al Qaeda
and ISIS, for example, that are all proxies
of The US and Israel.
That may sound so crazy to you if
you're just not paying attention. The evidence is
shocking.
I'm not gonna bring I'm gonna say bring
up the same articles every time that you
guys still don't
some of you out there choose not to
look at them. The evidence is very clear.
Try to think of the other example.
I mean, in in every dynamic we look
at. Like we saw with Guaido and Venezuela,
guys, they fund the opposition or Hamas in
Israel. That's what they do.
Sprinter Observer says Ukraine has agreed to give
$500,000,000,000
in rare earth minerals as payment for military
aid. Oh, good. So now because you kept
the war going, now you can harvest out
their minerals and keep giving them weapons. And
it keeps the merchants of death going because
that's the blood this country runs on, and
you can get the rare earth minerals to
just enough until you can then roll out
the infrastructure that this then becomes moot.
And, you know, they may make a deal.
They may not make a deal. They may
be Russian someday, or they may not be
Russian someday, but we're gonna have all this
money in there. And I say, I want
it back.
And I told them that I want
the equivalent, like, $500,000,000,000
worth of rare earth.
Isn't that a funny number?
I mean, it takes a special kind of
blindness to not see how all this connects.
$500,000,000,000
Stargate project, $600,000,000,000
offering from Saudi Arabia, which on all of
this, by the way, overlaps with the Gaza
rebuilding at the same time. I'm convinced they're
part of the same conversation.
And And then over here, you're going $500,000,000,000
rare earth minerals, which is for the AI
direction, but also the amount we need. I
mean, come on. Obviously, we're watching some massive
move take place and people are screaming about
woke and pronouns.
And they've essentially agreed to He says they've
essentially agreed, but I'm gonna wait to see
that really start to happen.
Now, Wyatt Reed simply highlighting Lindsey Graham
saying that exactly what we already know. Right?
And the point is, how long has he
been saying that they need these resources and
not Russia?
So why it reads, it's funny that libs
right now are spinning this as some uniquely
Trumpian move instead of just the standard neocon
impulse, which Lindsey Graham has spent the last
year demanding
Ukraine's Ten To Twenty 10 to $12,000,000,000,000
of critical minerals be delivered to the West
and not given to China or Putin.
This is what it's about.
It's not the only thing. There's clear other
agendas here, but if we start to stand
back and look at Israel funding these groups
in order to keep Russia engaged and and
and really push back
from areas they were trying to take, which
is the areas that have the most resources,
primarily like the Donbas, Crimea overlap. And then,
of course,
we have Israel funding them. We have then
Israel carrying out, and it's all of them.
US, Israel, UK. My point is you can
see all these moves taking place as they're
then rolling out the AI control structure. They're
rolling out their their start up entities all
over the area,
And now they're harvesting all the rare earth
minerals because China was in that dynamic as
well. But you can see how that played
out, at least on the surface. I think
there's more underneath that. But whether it's Ukraine,
whether it's Afghanistan, where they defrayed the cost
of the war for their minerals there as
well.
Thought that would pop up.
Haven't looked it up in a while.
But this has been going on a long
time. So now all my point is you
have Lindsey Graham basically they've tried to frame
this as some specific Trump thing. This has
been a long term dynamic, and Lindsey Graham
has always made it clear this is what
it was really about. So now they're able
to start to siphon those out because now
the agenda can begin.
Human life is a is a tool in
in all this for them.
So, again, Stargate project is why all this
is coming together. But it's really just the
beginning of the infrastructure for the technocracy they're
rolling out.
Here it is. Twenty seventeen.
The
US is to to extract minerals from Afghanistan,
of course, to defray the cost of US
assistance. Yeah. How'd that work out for them?
Your assistance destroyed their country, but you'll still
rape their country of all the resources because
that's what you're there for. This is how
it goes, guys. It's the long term agenda.
So as I said before, I think there's
overlap here. And as he's going and why
I think why it's crazy that open,
that Sam Altman and OpenAI can be standing
there for Trump's Stargate program while he's working
with DARPA's x AI Elon Musk.
It's just there's how do they even make
sense to anybody? And and he called him
the leading person. Okay. Well, I think they're
the face of the same agenda.
I simply and this is Washington Post. Elon
Musk led group launches one said 97, some
had a 20,
but a hundred billion dollar bid for ChatGPT,
which apparently Sam Altman said, no. Thank you.
But we'll just wait and see what happens
because they do that a lot. They give
you the first bluster of it all and
then really we see how it goes down.
But I simply said, well, isn't that interesting
with with what we've just been discussing? Right?
That there's there might be a plan here
where all this gets absorbed into the same
thing even though it's kind of already what's
happening. Now, overlapping this is what I said
earlier. This This is what I was trying
to grab earlier in the show. From 2025,
February eleventh, AI crawler wars threaten to make
the web more closed
for everyone.
And it says, we often take the internet
for granted.
It's an ocean of information at our at
our fingertips, and it simply works. But this
system relies on swarms of crawlers, bots that
roam the web, visit millions of websites every
day, and report what they see.
This is how Google powers search engines and
how Amazon sets competitive prices and how they
spy on you really and how Kayak or
Greg Greaves the Travel. Beyond the world of
commerce, crawlers are essential for monitoring web security,
enabling accessibility tools and preserving historical archives. Academics,
journalists, and civil societies rely on them to
conduct critical
research. Crawlers are endemic,
now representing half of all Internet traffic.
They will soon outpace human traffic. This unseen
subway of web ferries information from site to
site day and night. And as of late,
they serve one more purpose. I think the
main purpose.
Companies such as OpenAI
use web crawled data to train their artificial
intelligence systems.
That's wild.
So whatever you have out there is being
used to train them. That means it has
your personal data points. I I mean, we're
talking the digital twin overlap. We're talking about
the world, the very clear kind of, like,
cybernetics kind of dynamic that scares me, and
I think it's already happening.
It says, understandably, websites are now fighting back
for fear that this invasive species, AI crawlers,
will help displace them. But there's a problem.
This pushback is also threatening the transparency in
the open borders of the web that allow
non AI applications to flourish.
Unless we are thoughtful about how we fix
this or seeing as how they don't care,
this web will increasingly be fortified with logins,
paywalls, and access trolls that inhibit not just
AI, but the biodiversity
of real users and useful crawlers.
Wild.
Now
let's roll into the overlap into Gaza. So
everything we just laid out, I believe Gaza
is a central part to this.
Let's not forget about the unrealized potential of
Palestinian oil and gas reserves, as well as
minerals, as well as a few other dynamics
that are super important that Trump has just
laid out. This is just the one that
I have from 02/2019, showing you that they
know that there's a gold mine underneath this.
So let's talk about that.
Trump recently sat with the king of Jordan,
who I don't really take at face value
anymore because he made a huge statement at
the beginning of this about how West Bank
was a red line and hasn't even said
a word about that. Seems super buddy buddy
with Trump right now.
Trump vows
on the eleventh
to press King Jordan on Gaza cleansing. Now
that's how Consortium News trained it,
but ultimately, Trump did say clean it out.
So he's even they're not even mincing words
about this.
This is ethnic cleansing. There's no way around
it. Just because you don't like that term
does not mean removing an entire ethnicity from
the area and bringing in a new one
is textbook ethnic cleansing.
Just because he pretends they want this, they
don't. It's roundly shown and and for decade,
I mean, they've been screaming about this. They're
making signs to show the world on the
rebels that are their homes that we are
not going to leave.
But he wants you to believe because he
gives them fancy things and money that they're
gonna go they don't want that, guys. They
want their lives back. They want justice and
accountability for the group that killed their families,
not the money that gives them that they're
the people involved with killing those families gives
you.
How how could you be happy with living
in a home bought by blood money from
the people that killed your family?
But the point is, he vows to press
him. Okay? Now on the,
the eleventh of the same day, he speaks
with him.
And here's a couple of things they said,
and I'll play a little bit of this.
Now, and we're gonna have some longer discussions
after this.
And,
the relationship with Jordan has been very strong,
has been with me, and I really has
been with the country.
But I think I've been closer than other
presidents to Jordan and what Jordan represents,
and it's an honor to have you and
your son.
I just think it's so funny how insecure
he is. Trump's always the best at everything,
and he's always the one that did better
than anybody else. And he did more than
anybody else and whatever we're talking about all
the time times 45 because I'm the best.
With us today, and and if you'd like
to say a few words, and thank you
very much. Mister president, thank you very much
for having us and so short after your
acknowledgment, I think just as a testament to
what you said is a special relationship between,
our two countries and the personal relationship of
the friendship and trust between the two of
us.
There was blank discussions ahead. Very good. Very
good. Thank you very much. Mister president,
many people in the region, especially in Jordan,
are worried about the annexation of the West
Bank. Will you give the his majesty the
king guarantee
that you won't allow Israel to annex the
West Bank? And how are you gonna I
think that's gonna work out very well.
Damn it. I was muted. Oh, well. I'm
not gonna say all that again. His point
was, it frustrates me that he can roll
out these answers that are just deliberately dishonest.
And I think what you're gonna hear is
the idea that
if you can't hear what he says in
response to the West Bank here, it pains
me because of how obvious it is.
Right? In front of the guy who said
a red line is
anything West Bank is being taken over right
now. We'll end with that today. It's being
destroyed. It's being ethnically cleansed. It's another aspect
of the genocide, like Lebanon and Syria.
But for him to sit there and act
like it's not a problem or it's gonna
turn out just fine, as he literally tells
you there is no right of return, they're
not gonna be allowed to come back, he
is carrying out Israel's agenda. Exactly. I mean,
exactly what we said would happen the moment
this started. Exactly what anybody said would happen
that's been paying attention to what Israel has
been telling you they want.
But here we are.
That's not really what we're talking about today.
I think that's something that's gonna work out
automatically,
and it's in good shape. Oh, okay. Yeah.
Automatically. Meaning, we're getting rid of them, and
it's already in good shape. We're already halfway
done. So it's gonna work out. Oh, what
he means, he's gonna work out for our
investors. It's gonna work out for Israel. It's
gonna work out work out for those we
care about, which is money and big business
and not you. At the very least, not
Palestinians.
But see, if he just pretends if he
just lets these
blind following so called journalists ask broad questions
where he can kind of halfway clumsy step
around them. You he'll let you decide whatever
you want. You make up whatever narrative you
want to make sense of his opaque words
because wink wink the thing said online today.
It's obvious what's happening.
And, we discussed it. Other people have discussed
it with us and with me.
That's gonna work out. West Bank is gonna
work out very well. Oh, so so means
nothing. We've discussed things. It's gonna work out.
What does that mean? You mean the torture
and rape and destruction of homes that's happening
right now, that's gonna stop? Or
not at all and it'll continue and then
it'll work out for you guys? Are we
pretending like Trump is not overtly on Israel's
side? And if that's the case, then what
are we talking about? It's obvious that he
has an interest in doing what Israel wants
here. He was paid to do it by
by Mary Madelsohn.
Mister Biden, why shouldn't the king take in
the Palestinian people? Hold on. Let me go
back real quick.
Other presidents to Jordan and what this have
been his representation. I should, I think, just
as a testament to what you said as
a, a, mister president, I I what we
have in The Middle East and to all
of us in the region continue Especially if
you're going on. Yeah. I thought there's a
part where I guess this is the a
video is different I watched earlier. The part
where you mentioned some cancer kids, I think
it might come up. I don't have a
play at all. But the point is he
mentions a bunch of cancer kids that he
wants to take out of out of Palestine.
And Trump goes, oh, it's so beautiful. It's
so beautiful. I didn't even know about that.
How do you not know about something like
that?
Not first of all, not know that there
are two hundred kids with cancer and other
problems in Gaza because they were not allowed
to leave because there's no hospitals.
Or the fact that that's a fraction
of people that have this limbs blown off
and edge all sorts of other elements and
issues that can't be dealt with or the
fact that they're still starving. And what they
despite the aid that's rushed in over the
last couple of days. It's incredible.
He either did know that or he's not
even trying to pay attention because he knows
who signs his checks.
Oh, sorry. 2,000 kids. I I I had
it wrong. So it's it's even more. We'll
play it a little bit here. I think
the Egyptians to present their plan on Oh,
I think that's it right there. So let
me go back a little bit. I have
just something to say because we and Can
you give the as much as can guarantee
that you want to be here unless you
said, sir, we've got some very good West
Bank. And how are you gonna I think
that's gonna work out very well. That's not
really well. That's gonna work out. West Bank
is gonna work out. Next one, he asked
about how whether they'll have space for them.
Now I can't believe we're even in a
part where we're pretending like it's okay for
them to be moved to a new location.
You know, the exact thing that they all
said we were racist for even suggesting they
would consider,
and now they're forcing down your throat. And
the same people that said you were racist
are not telling you that it was why
it makes sense. I that's what I keep
talking about, guys. How does anybody not see
how jarring that is? Very well. Mister president,
why should the king take in the Palestinian
people? He's made clear he doesn't want to.
Well, I don't know, but he may have
just something to say because we discussed,
just briefly,
I think maybe you wanna say it now
or Ah, okay. Right. So now do you
wanna go ahead and say the thing that
I'm you know? So clearly, they the Jordan
King has been saying things a lot, like
with West Bank, and then not really falling
through. So either it's all bluster or they
had sit down and some kind of, you
know, Israel focus. It's something. They sanction threats
or whatever else. That's how they roll. And
so Trump has him in his position. You
wanna go ahead and say what I want
you to say now? Go ahead.
Well,
mister president, I I think,
we have to keep in mind that there
is
a a plan from Egypt and the Arab
countries. We're being invited by Mohammed bin Salman
to discussions in in Riyadh. I think the
point is is how do we make this
work in a way? Let's be clear that
whether it's fake or not, Saudi Arabia has
been very clear. No Palestinian state, no agreement
with Israel. K? Egypt has already come out
more than once and said this is not
happening. There's already claims of Egyptian tanks rolling
towards the borders. I wasn't able to care
to clarify.
Either way, the point is that they're saying
no.
So what happens if they just simply put
their foot down? Which would surprise me. But,
you know, if you're a puppet like Cece,
oftentimes, if you're not feel like you're getting
something out of it, a lot of times
they change sides. And we've seen that over
the years. And that's how the Saddam Hussein
ally becomes the Saddam Hussein enemy, or the
Osama bin Laden warrior of peace the Washington
Post wrote about becomes the bad guy villain
of 09/11 even though most of those have
the same villain that we're not talking about.
The point is clearly, it's a shifting game.
And so Cece could suddenly just be like,
this is not my interest because my people
don't want it. And even though I was
put here by you and I've been carrying
out your agendas for years, now suddenly I
want something different. I don't know. All possible.
The point is
if it doesn't get allowed, what happens then?
Well, I think we already see the ethnic
cleansing where they're not moved somewhere else continues,
and that's the point. They're already basically saying
that and going, we gotta move them because
look. It's terrible there. Yeah. And what are
you holding out there?
Why is it terrible? So if we're only
missing that Israel's murdering them all, so let's
just stop Israel from murdering them first, then
we can take our time and figure, no.
We have to rush through and move out
of the way because that's what Israel wants.
This is a very clumsily put together plan,
and I think most people see right through
it. That is,
good for everybody. Obviously,
we we have to look at, the best
interest of of The United States, of the
people in the region, especially to my people
of Jordan.
And we're going to have some interesting discussions
today. I think one of the things that
That's not what Trump wanted to say, by
the way. You could tell. We can do
right away,
is, take, 2,000,
children that are either cancer children There it
is. In a very,
ill state, to Jordan as quickly as possible.
And then we Why are they not going
why are they being held back?
There's no way to misunderstand that, guys. Israel
won't let them leave.
Like, okay. If you're pretending it's Hamas holding
them, then why would they suddenly let them
go now?
That doesn't make sense. So if suddenly they
can allow them out, that means Israel is
allowing them out. They have been holding them
back because they're terrible. These are very these
are monstrous people. Not every Israeli or every
Jew. I'll say it every time because it's
the not it's the truth. It is simply
these people who care anybody, whether you're Jewish
or Christian or whatever else, who is doing
this is a monster. Simple.
You have to recognize how clear that is.
It's not just cancer patients, guys. It's everything
else you could imagine. This was a population
of 2,000,000 people.
Women have had pregnancies that they've children that
have died. Children have come out stillborn. People
have died while they're pregnant. They have arms
blown off, legs blown off. Everything you could
imagine. People that are dealing with other kinds
of illnesses. Peep dealing with basic things that
become serious and life threatening because they don't
have hospitals or treatment or any of it.
Now Trump pretends, oh, I didn't know about
that.
Think about pretending that right now. For, I
think, the Egyptians to present their plan on
how we can work with the president
to, work on the Gaza challenges.
So you're I wanna tell you said you'd
Excuse me, Webb. Just please.
I didn't know that what you just said.
Two thousand children with cancer or other problems.
And,
wow, that's really a beautiful gesture. That's really
good. And I Well, now let's even see
if that happens, by the way. And even
if it does, it's a small gesture into
a millions group of a million what? Almost
what would it be now? I mean, they
keep saying 1.7, seeing as how they clearly
know that hundreds of thousands have been killed.
Millions of people. So it's a small gesture,
but it would still be a very positive
thing to happen, and it it would be
a token if they continue murdering them all.
But let's even see if that happens. How
much you wanna bet that doesn't even actually
happen? And I'm only saying that because of
how often this stuff continues to happen. You
just watch them. Be a student of history,
guys. They lie constantly.
But I hope it does because they deserve
all of them deserve this to stop. We
appreciate it, and we'll be working on the
rest, with,
with Egypt. I think, you're gonna see some
Oregon on the rest. So he just jumps
right back, getting them out of there, moving
them out of the way. Now let's be
clear about something.
We're talking about Palestinians.
There's no mixing this up because right now,
they're pretending like, oh, we're helping the kids.
We're getting the power we're gonna move them
into new places. So are we pretending he's
building homes for Hamas? No.
Obviously. So
note how we go through this conversation and
how they go through the conversation. And moment
to moment, it seems to conflate
Palestinian and Hamas over and over and over
because we've always been telling you that.
Israel's at war with Palestinians
or Lebanese, anybody pushing back on what they
want. Civilians, children, women, all of it. They
just call it one thing. Hezbollah, the reality
is clear. They keep talking about all of
this like we're getting rid. Rid. What about
the here here's the point. Just to bring
it home and you'll hear it as they
talk. If they don't bring those hostage back,
we'll be it'll be a living hell.
So who are you threatening?
So you're you just told us we don't
know where the hostages are. We don't know
where everybody is. But if you don't bring
them back, we're gonna destroy everything.
Is that how does that possibly line up
for honest people?
You just said you're gonna kill so you're
gonna kill everybody
if they don't give you what you want.
That means you're a monster.
Right? So just listen as we go through
it as they pretend we're helping Palestinians, but
then go on to make an argument that
if they don't do this, we're gonna hurt
them all, showing you that they're collective punishment
and they're focusing on all of them. So
either is everybody move the hell out of
our area or we're gonna kill you all.
That's the real argument being had here.
Great progress. I think with Jordan, you're gonna
see some great progress.
Three of us, and we'll have some others
helping, and we're gonna have some others at
a very high level helping, and the whole
thing will come. It's not a complex thing
to do. And with The United States being
in control of that,
piece of land, a fairly large piece of
land, you Control.
That works?
We're gonna US is gonna I thought that
was a I thought that was a a
ploy. Right? Maybe it is. Maybe it's still
a bargaining ploy, but just like Greenland or
just like Hezbollah, and, you know, it's a
game until it's not anymore.
And we just don't even miss a beat.
Right? You were getting laughed out for falling
you were getting laughed at for falling for
his troll.
And at the end of that sentence is
suddenly like, how are you not supporting this?
It's gonna save the country.
Like, what?
Again, it's jarring. It's whiplash. You're like, how
the hell? What the point is they don't
care.
Those people, minority, don't care about the facts.
It's about supporting the current thing. They are
the left of the right.
Have stability in The Middle East for the
first time.
And,
the Palestinians or the people that live now
in Gaza will be living beautifully in another
location. They're gonna be living safely. They're not
gonna be,
killed, murdered, and having to leave every ten
years. Oh, why is it happening again, Trump?
They love to scream Hamas, but it's not
true.
The only time this happens is when Israel
bombs them all. So if you wanna say
it's Hamas, wouldn't they be dying every moment
of every year you look back? They're not.
So Israel continues to murder them, make them
life hell on earth, and we're gonna pretend
like that's not obvious every moment you're talking.
We're gonna move them into places that they
don't wanna go to, that the UN and
everybody else in any position of standing has
been clear that's not even legally allowed.
But we're gonna do it anyway because Israel
paid me. Because I've been watching this for
so many years. It's it's nothing but trouble.
Everyone's being killed. They're being,
robbed. It's it's it's By Israel.
Yeah. Very easily proven over and over and
over. Every single claim they've made from the
moment this started post October 7 has been
proudly shown to be false. I mean, damn
near everything. They were even just again caught
using human shields on their side calling it
the mosquito procedure.
Harrettes covered that. I think it was Washington
Post as well openly.
We're not I guess we're just past even
caring about these things anymore because, well, they
have power now. So who cares? Shut up.
Technocracy. Go to bed. It's like living in
hell, and they're gonna end up having a
a great home, great
families that don't have to get, mugged and
killed and beaten up and harassed by Hamas
and everybody else. Right. That's it. So we're
just gonna make sure that the people I
mean,
it's the same point. It's just frustrating.
Do you think he doesn't know any of
this? And if he doesn't, how do you
want this person in power?
And, I know we'll be I That's our
choice anyway, by the way. Able to work
something. And,
you and you what you just said about
the 2,000 is fantastic.
It's so beautiful. It's music to my ears.
Yeah. But we're gonna be able to work
something, and I know we'll be able to
work something also. Work Work some we're gonna
be able to work something. I know we're
gonna work something also.
That's gibberish.
Nothing. No substance.
It is it is rambling narrative about how
we're gonna accomplish whatever. And then whatever happens
will be what he promised even though none
of it was actually expressed.
With,
with, I believe,
not not a %, but 99%
we're gonna work out something with Egypt. Is
this really that during your election campaign? Mister
Brennan, you how how is The US how
is My US going to own Gaza? Your
White House has been clear taxpayer dollars won't
be used for this. So what money are
you gonna use to buy Gaza?
We're not gonna buy anything. We're gonna have
it. Oh, okay. We're not gonna buy it.
We're gonna have it.
Don't these statements worry anybody?
Acquiring Greenland, we're just gonna have it. Well,
that's because Israel's taking it.
That's what that's there's no there's no confusion
there. So the and and as we'll get
to,
Israel's gonna be in charge of controlling it.
So, basically, it's all a bunch of narrative,
and you're letting Israel take control of Gaza.
Yeah.
Surprise, surprise. Gonna keep it, and we're gonna
make sure that there's gonna be peace,
and there's not gonna be any problem and
no Of course. So because if we destroy
everybody we don't like and let Israel take
it over and make a bunch of Jewish
settlements, they'll they'll be peace.
Hooray. But there won't be actually because this
will not go away because Palestinians, unless they
completely destroy them demand, will continue to have
a problem with this, and other countries will
too.
Because we're not talking about the the Jordans
and, you know, CC and King Jordan governments
here. We're talking about the peoples of these
countries and the groups within them that rise
up when they recognize that they're being taken
advantage of.
It's like anything else. Right? The idea simply
is that if you believe like, in this
country right now, how about if we came
to a point where we could forbid, like,
rather
whatever the right you could prove it. Whatever
you think that means, prove it that Israel
put Trump in this position.
Or let's just say China put Biden in
that position to make it easier for you
to wrap your mind around. Okay? And we
can prove it.
What do you think Republican militias would do?
Do you think they would sit back and
just go, well, I don't wanna be a
criminal?
No. You would go, our country has been
stolen from us. So we have a legal
right to take it back.
Now just because we don't look at it
like that when other countries do it or
because they're different color than us, it's not
it's not the same thing. Now, obviously, we
don't know that could be different dynamics. They
the point is that's something you always have
to consider.
Same with Hamas, same with any other location
that's illegally occupied,
whether it's Syria by The United States and
now Israel
or Iraq by The United States and now
Israel or anywhere else we're talking about or
Israel and Lebanon or Israel and Gaza. These
are occupied illegally according to literally everybody with
legal standing.
So same point applies. These groups will still
see this as their territory, will never go
away. The only way it will go away
if Israel stops being the illegal occupier.
That's it.
And agrees to something that actually resolves it
instead of pretending to and then funding Hamas
so it doesn't ever happen, which we'll show
again today in a minute. The reality of
them claiming that Hamas is so evil,
the Hamas that Israel funds right up until
October 7. It's amazing
that they can't have an honest conversation about
it, which shows you what they they know
it's there.
Not the corporate media, not even the human
rights group. Nobody can talk about it. It's
one of the most publicly stated things that
every we have Ben Barak,
IluBharak,
former prime minister. You've got the former head
of Shin Bet. You've got Koretz may multiple
Israeli articles quoting what he said in a
meeting in the Likud party. We funded Hamas.
That's our strategy. It's public, and yet we
can't have an honest conversation about it. So
when he's talking about Hamas, remember, that's Israel
funded, is US funded. But he's gonna question
it,
and we're going to How is my west
going to own Gaza? Your White House has
made clear taxpayer dollars won't be used for
this. So when when are you gonna use
to buy, Gossett? We'll, we're not gonna buy
anything. We're gonna have it, and we're gonna
keep it, and we're gonna make sure that
there's gonna be peace.
And there's not gonna be any problem, and
nobody's gonna question it.
And we're going to,
run it very properly, and eventually, we'll have
economic development at a very large scale, maybe
the largest scale on that site,
and we'll have And that's gonna get all
the people out there that see money signs.
Right? People that don't care at all about
the the plight of the Palestinians or the
Israelis. They just wanna profit from change like
we see in anything like Lahaina or anywhere
else. And they will rush in like vultures,
and they're his people
every single time.
But, I mean, just think about what we're
talking about. You know? Taking this location, removing
them from the place, take building what you
want and saying we will control it. You
know why I think he's saying that? Because
he knows these people have played the cue
game like a like a fiddle.
So now and they're using it.
It's not and probably know it's even them.
The point is that ultimately, that narrative is
they're saving Israel for last. They're still pretending
that. It's embarrassing.
So if he pretends that somehow he's gonna
neuter them by taking control of this and
that, and we're gonna blah blah blah.
Maybe though that doesn't even line up if
you really think about it. It's working for
some of them. When in reality, as we'll
play, he's gonna let Israel control it, and
they won't even be in I I guarantee
this is something they're jointly working at. So
they're still like, we have US troops on
the ground right now in Gaza. Like, we've
already shown well before this new US g
solutions part of it.
They will continue to work there, but Israel
is getting what it wants. And if you
don't think these Zionist maniacs are gonna take
what they want regardless of what Trump says
or that you could see how much they're
influencing what he does anyway, you're just not
paying attention. Well, lots of good things built
there, including hotels and office buildings and housing
and other things.
Or we could've just not destroyed all of
theirs.
But too late now, so now we gotta
fix it. Right? Gotta reimagine Gaza, if you
will. And we'll make that site into what
it should be. And the people from Gaza
who wouldn't be able to be be there
for years because you're talking about Because Netanyahu
and their bombing. Like, are we still now
he can't even pretend it's something else that's
like that even if you blame Hamas because
of Netanyahu's
carpet bombing of an area that held hostages
of Israel.
Just to get it and prepare it and,
to take care of all of the problems
that currently it has as you know, tunnels
and I mean, just so he's just so
opaque and broadened and, like, he's he's very
carefully trying not to step on anything that
sounds like Israel might be responsible.
How do you not see that?
Like, he and and and to the point
where it makes him sound really stupid,
more so than usual, like, very clumsy and
very abstract. He's not really saying we're making
this and we're making that. It doesn't and
he's always kind of like that, rambling and
kind of let you think what you want.
I think it's clear he's afraid to say
something that makes them look bad. Put her
in those tunnels,
and you have some good people and some
bad people, and you may have hostages right
now. You know, you have the hostages
possibly there. They don't Yeah. Yeah. Oh, oops.
Now that's bad because we know Israel's been
bombing the entire area. But no one no
one's confused about that. Even Israelis know know
that. They've been killing their own people. Hannibal
directive has been admitted by even the Israeli
media, but
he doesn't know about that, though. Oh, look
into that. I don't know where they are.
And, you know, I have a Saturday deadline,
and I don't think they're gonna make the
deadline personally. I think they,
they wanna play tough guy. We'll see how
tough they are.
But it's, it's gonna be a wonderful thing.
It's gonna be wonderful for The Middle East,
I think. So we start with Hamas. Right?
It's how tough they are. Okay.
So what are we talking about? We have
a Saturday deadline for the hostages to be
returned. We'll get to that next. These are
two different conversations, really, even though they're kind
of just overlapping.
That's the whether they return the hostages, and
the point was we'll get to next. Israel
has violated the ceasefire, which is what they
stated.
And now they're using that to claim they
violated it, which is, by the way, like,
verbatim what I said would happen. Did I
not? And right at the second phase, I'm
not psychic. It's what we knew because we're
paying attention. It's amazing how far ahead you
could be the story if you just watch
a show that's not partisan
and willing to lie to you for different
reasons.
But the over up the the point the
point here is he just is he saying
but it's, it's gonna be a wonderful thing.
It's gonna be wonderful for the Middle East.
I think it'll turn the Middle East. I
think you're gonna have peace in the Middle
East. You're gonna eventually have peace in The
Middle East. Couldn't this
couldn't this deadline,
risk undermining the talks that you're having with
the the king today? I mean, risk the
kind of wider peace that you're trying to
be. The deadline is what I'm wanting to
hear. So the deadline point is you're giving
them by Saturday. We have to have all
those people back. Otherwise, what? We're gonna rain
down hell on all the people that you
pretend you're trying to save.
So you can't just pretend those two things
line up, that you either want to save
these people or think it's your objective to
not hurt civilians or you
kill them all if they don't get out
of the way. So it shows clearly what
the game is. Israel wants them all out
of the way or we're gonna kill them
all. There's no way around that. That's what
they've been doing the entire time. It takes
a child to not see that.
And here, he's just laying it out. We're
gonna do that. Even, like, just went on
about how what about the 2,000 cancer kids?
Because realize if that doesn't if we don't
make the deal, that doesn't happen.
So we'll kill them all, I guess, because
Israel said. Because it's not we're not talking
about a big situation. We're talking about something
that can go very quickly.
We're talking if it's gonna go quickly. It's
not gonna take a long time. Yeah. It's
only taking seventy six years to figure it
out. It's just like that. We'll take it
real quick. And if not, we'll do what
we want anyway. K. That's not gonna be
Where where when you You know bullies? You
know what a bully is. Right?
You know the the bully? I've always and
I found it throughout my life. A bully
is the weakest person. Ah, sounds like he's
watching our show. Sounds like what we say
about them. You know why? Because that's literally
what they're doing. This is what Elon and
Trump do so well.
I mean, honestly, kinda clumsy, but they do
this in because, I guess, people fall for
it in their in their groups. But they
like, Elon posted a meme about how, you
know,
the resistance is you know, like, well, not
the one today. That was similar. But, like,
how the you know, you supported the resistance
on the d on the, you know, Star
Wars and but now you're on this it's
like, that's you. You're literally pointing to the
thing that you're doing. Or Elon talking about
unelected bureaucrats. And I'm like,
hello?
You're you're literally an elect bureaucrat. It's just
so stupid. But my point is that when
they do that, they're just trying to make
it seem like they're not the thing. So
what they are, and this is what I
very clearly think, and you've heard me say
this so many times, I've never heard them
say this,
Are the people that need to pound their
chest. We're big and tough, which usually indicates,
not always, but that they're not big and
tough. Then they have some power, but they're
insecure. And I see that with everything this
guy does. He needs to constantly bolster himself.
He needs to puff his chest out and
say, I've did better than anybody.
That's not what strong people do. I've always
said that. That's what Elon Musk and the
rest of them. They they strike me as
very insecure people. That doesn't mean that they're
not strong and powerful and educated. The point
you could decide for yourself on those things.
But it does show that they have a
weakness when it comes to needing to be
the per like, they need to project the
strength and, you know, strong people tend to
not do that. Like, genuinely strong and secure
and mentally sound people, You know, the whole,
like, walk softly carry a big stick kinda
thing or how's how's however that saying goes.
I just think it's backward. Anyway, the point
is simply that if you're out there pounding
your chest and screaming, I'm the strongest, I'll
beat up anybody, usually, you're the one that's
most weak at least in some way. And
I've said that recently a lot. I just
think it's funny that he suddenly says this.
Believe it that.
And they're bullies.
Oh, and, again, the last point is, obviously,
what do you see them doing?
What do you see them doing? Do you
see them
simply standing back and responding?
No. You see them screaming
every single time they end Israel and dropping
them and rejecting into the world about what
we're doing and what you're doing wrong and
what we're gonna what is the other side
doing? Very little of that. And that's again,
that's not always recipe. It's just an overarching
point, but that's what they do. So when
he sits here and acts like they're the
bully, it's the same point. He's just projecting
as they then act in exactly that way
against everyone they're talking about. Hamas is bullies.
Hamas by the way, Hamas is bullies, by
the way. Make sure you write that down.
The weakest people are bullies. You know that.
Right?
Alright. Go ahead. Mister president, you were saying
That was out of nowhere. I'm telling you.
I swear to god, this guy. I find
it funny. I often wonder if there are
things we do that somehow make it into
these circles. I don't know. Maybe maybe we're
too small for that, but I know it's
funny. Saying that, Palestinians will live somewhere else
safe.
Where exactly do you want them to live?
Well, it's not where I want them to
live. If it's gonna be where we, ultimately
choose as a group. Oh, okay. So it's
no longer their choice?
Are we is anybody missing that right now?
So they no longer decide their own future.
Why is that?
Are we are we just pretending, like, oh,
because they voted in Hamas last time. Well,
that doesn't that's not your responsibility.
You don't get to revoke their ability for
their own self determination.
Whether it's this location or not, if they're
gonna move, let them vote for it. They're
not gonna do that because they don't care
about these people. These people are in the
way of their agenda, and they just need
to make you think they care.
If you actually have the brain to put
this together, you can already see they don't
care in every possible way. These people have
the rights of human beings like anybody else,
and now they're collectively deciding where they're gonna
be displaced to even though that in and
of itself is a crime
right on the surface.
And I believe we'll have a parcel of
land in
Jordan. I believe we'll have a parcel of
land in Egypt. So he's just doubling down
on saying these things. Even the guy next
to him already put I again, I'm of
the mind that Jordan's gonna fall. Like, it's
gonna lean into whatever Trump does. But he
was still he didn't wanna say that. And
Egypt has at least said no publicly,
and he just says that's what's happening. So
if that does happen,
it's just again, it makes my point for
me. That means they either lied to make
it seem like there was pushback or they
were pushing back and they got coerced by
whatever they're doing.
It's all about them, them, them. We may
have,
someplace else, but I think when we finish
our talks, we'll have a place where,
they're gonna live very happily and very safely.
Regardless if they want, though, by the way,
we'll decide a beach amongst Egypt, Jordan, and
Israel what the people that Israel's been killing
want. And, you know, don't forget, they
only wanna be on the Gaza Strip because
they don't know anything else. They never Oh,
is that why they're too dumb to know
what else goes on in the world? No.
It's their territory. This is
This
is the most insulting,
ignorant
thing that he said today. They
don't know anything else. They don't know what
else to do. Guys, you know why that
is if that's even the truth? Because they've
never been allowed to leave.
How long have I said that, and how
long have I been called racist for pretending?
Yeah. It's not real. It's not an open
air prison. Oops.
Well, he just admitted that it was because
they've they've never been able to go anywhere
else. You see, you can't walk through this.
Like, how long have I said that to?
If you lie about everything, eventually, you're gonna
step on a previous lie. You're gonna have
a new agenda that's gonna end up covering
something else. There you go. Either they were
allowed to leave and Israel's allowed to leave
and then they're just terrorists, or they were
never allowed to leave. You can't make it
both ways.
Add an alternative.
And they don't wanna be on the Gaza
Strip. Not true. One of the easiest things
in this conversation to see is that they
definitely want to stay there. I mean, let
let's let's be clear about this. Most of
these people have been publicly saying this the
entire time. They've been standing up and making
statements and making public declares and writing things
on walls. And if they really did want
to leave, there'd be much more of a
movement to make that happen. If you listen
to people there or the journalists that are
covering it,
I don't see anybody,
especially if they've lasted this long. I mean,
they are determined.
It's again, one of the most inspiring things
about these people is how resilient they are
in the face of such horrific atrocities. But
they have no choice. They have to be.
And they're being killed there at levels that
nobody's ever seen. No no place in the
world is, like, as as dangerous as the
Gaza Strip. Oh, yeah. Because it's just date
there must be tigers and lions in there.
Right? No. No. It's because Israel's bombing them
all and murdering and raping and torturing.
No place in the world is like
but they have no choice. They have to
be. And they're being killed there at levels
that nobody's ever They don't have to. I
I wonder so what he's trying to say
is that Hamas is keeping them there, and
they're actually revitalizing that lie.
They're literally I mean, this is the thing.
If if they're being stuck there, then why
are they gonna be allowed to leave?
Wouldn't that still be Hamas stopping them? I
mean, their lies are transparent.
No. Because once they're allowed to leave or
rather they're forced out because you're pushing them
out, they will go because you're being pushed
out. There's no Hamas in there stopping them
from going. That's never been the case. They've
been telling you that, but that's a new
Netanyahu push again. And that's them holding that's
this is how they make it seem as
if they didn't wanna kill them, but they
did because Hamas was holding them all. Right.
A million people, they're all bound to their
legs apparently.
See, no no place in the world is,
like, as as dangerous as the Gaza Strip.
They don't wanna be there. They have no
alternative. When they have an alternative Well, right
now in in some parts of Lebanon and
Syria and parts that you occupy around the
world, Iraq and different yeah. There are, like,
Yemen, for example, are some very bad and
dangerous places. Largely for the exact same reasons,
by the way, because of your occupation, because
of Israel's bombing. But let's make it unique
for their conversation. Not one person will wanna
stay where they are. Nobody wants to They
do, though. He's lying, and we know that.
Say that they're living in hell Because of
Netanyahu. It's a death trap. Because of Netanyahu.
President, how do you know And you, by
the way, Trump still to this day, $7,400,000,000
in bombs and weapons. You're part of that.
That the Palestinians don't want to leave their
land.
Some people say this is ethnic cleansing. It
is. You won't be able to force them
to leave their land. This We're moving them
to a beautiful
location
where they have new home. Oh, see. So
he just gets right past it because you
can't address that.
Yes. Some of them want to leave. Now
let's even pretend that some of them want
to leave.
I think I just said some some of
them most of them, as far as I
can tell, want to stay. They've made that
clear. But let's pretend that some of them
wanna leave. What about the ones that don't
want to?
All he's just done did did made clear,
it's not their choice.
We're gonna give them not everybody wants your
money and your nice house, Trump, especially assuming
that even happens.
You're bribing them to leave their hometown.
They're like, imagine this again. Same conversation.
You live in Florida.
Biden gets taken over by China and they
occupy the country, and suddenly they start going,
get out of Florida. We're making this Chinese
you know, we own this territory from thirty
five hundred years ago. God said, get out
of the way.
And say, well, look. We're gonna build you
beautiful homes over there in Africa. Get out
of the way.
What are you doing? Don't you want a
better house? Don't you want free things?
Well, you must be a racist. You must
hate Jewish people.
Oh, excuse me, Chinese people.
I mean, come on, guys. It's just lazy
that we even pretend that's not as obvious
as it gets.
They don't that you can't just pretend like
they should want what I want, so therefore,
get out of the way. It's disgusting.
It's wrong. It is the most immoral,
lacking of principle thing I've seen in this
entire conversation. They're showing you who they are.
But all these sycophants are gonna scream that
it's better for them, and you're a bad
person for supporting Hamas even though none of
that's what's happening. You mean Hamas that Israel
finds? Oh, let's keep the conversation going. Homes
where they can live safely, where they'll have
doctors and medical. They don't have doctors and
medical because you killed them all because you
blew them all up.
And all of those things, and I think
it's gonna be great. Yeah. Any questions? King
King Abdullah, what Don't you love that? It's
just it's gonna be great. Anything else over
here? Anyone not asking right questions about ethic
cleansing? Yeah. Let's just get get back to
the fun stuff that makes me look good.
When you think about The US taking over
the concept, do you wanna see The US
on the Gaza Strip? Well, I think as
I said earlier,
the the president is looking at, Egypt coming
to present that plan.
So he doesn't wanna address it. Coward.
I I felt that way from early part
of this when he didn't follow-up on the
West Bank. That's a coward.
He asked you point blank, what do you
think about The US occupying Gaza? Which is
not for certain what's gonna happen, but they're
gonna let Israel take it. That's for sure.
I'll play you that next.
But he just lets it
go. Broad, opaque. He's taking lessons from Trump.
As I said, we will be in Saudi
Arabia to discuss how we can, work with
the president and with The United States.
So I think let's wait until the Egyptians
can come present to to the president and
not get ahead of ourselves. Yeah. So let's
not let's not answer. Even though Trump has
been, like, tripling down in front of you
45 times out, it's just what we're doing,
and they're gonna be involved. They're gonna make
it happen. Is there a partial land in
Jordan that you're willing to have, Palestine? Well,
I think what we said, I have to
look at the best interest of of my
country. I think the the president, is very
happy that we do this thing with 2,000,
children as quickly as possible.
And again Hey. Take the token, shut up,
and stop questions. Okay? I I believe that
the president is looking forward to to getting
a group of us Arabs, here,
to discuss,
the overall plan. And and last question, the
the the 2,000 children, are those from the
Gaza Strip? Absolutely. From the Gaza Strip. You
would need to change your mind, mister That's
from the Gaza Strip, the 2,000.
This is so funny to me.
Guys, if you've ever been around somebody like
this, he's so insecure. It kills me.
I'm sure people will make it out, Trump
derangement syndrome. It's just it doesn't matter who
it is, left or right or Trump or
Biden.
You don't do that unless you are you
need to be in control of the room.
This isn't about news. I just think this
is quite frankly very obvious. Watch the way
he does that. So the guy answers the
question,
and somebody else has already started to ask
another question, and Trump has to go, it's
the thing. He I I'm the one. I
said that.
Watch.
I have to look at the best interest
of of my country. I think the the
president, is very happy that we do this
thing with 2,000, children as quickly as possible.
And, again, I I believe that the president
is looking forward to to getting a group
of us Arabs, here,
to discuss,
the overall plan. And and last question, the
the the 2,000 children, are those from the
Gaza Strip? Absolutely. From the Gaza Strip. Okay.
He
answered. Absolutely from Gaza
Strip. Now Trump just waits half a second,
lets him begin a second question, and then
just for some reason You would like to
change your mind this That's from the Gaza
Strip, the 2,000.
Oh, okay. Now it's clear. I was confused
until Trump reiterated what he just said. Okay.
Now we're good. Guys, that's just straight up
insecurity.
That is one of the most obvious times
I've seen that. Wanted to point it out.
Willing to change your mind if you hear
the Egyptian and the Arab land end of
the month? If they present you something different,
are you are you over in terms of
that? We sort of have gone down the
line. We know pretty much what is going
to be presented.
Okay. So she asked point blank, if they
don't go along with your plan, they want
something different, will you be open to that?
His answer was no. He doesn't say it
like that, but that's what his answer is.
We already know what they're gonna present, and
it's gonna be what Israel wants.
And I think it's gonna be something that's
gonna be magnificent for the Palestinians. They're gonna
they're gonna be in love with it. Okay.
Okay. So what he means is the same
thing I just said. We're gonna give them
we're gonna pretend we're building them new places,
which I'd wait to see that even happen.
I doubt it will, quite frankly. It's gonna
be some half measure of, like, everything else
they do because they don't care about you
or anybody else. But
the the claim is we'll move them over
there with money and stuff.
That's not what they want. They're not gonna
be happy about it because they already tell
you that. He's just claiming the lie yet
again.
I did very well with real estate. I
can tell you about real estate. They're gonna
be in love with it. Oh, money money,
things and stuff. I know things, so they're
gonna be great. Because everybody's like me and
selfish and but, you know, it's like, come
on, guys. That is he's everything they talk
about is is about the one one point
o 1%. The people that make the money
off the stock market and benefit from the
business deals and the the infrastructure and real
estate. That's like nobody in this conversation.
You think the Palestinian child that doesn't have
any toys anymore, that's been wandering on the
dirt with bare feet is gonna care whether
you give them?
It's just exhausting.
But, mister president, it doesn't concern you that
that moving, 2,000,000 people from from, dead very
small number of people relative to other things
that have taken place over the,
decades and centuries.
Okay. You're right.
There's a small number of have a couple
of hundred years of things that have happened,
you know, brush it off. It's a very
small number of people. No. It's not. It's
not. It's a huge, gigantic effort to move
a million people anywhere.
So, yeah, he doesn't know that, or he's
just trying to downplay because it's a huge
feat that probably won't even happen. And they're
living a talk a terrible life. Look at
look at the way that Yeah. Look at
what Netanyahu's done to them. Can't we just
get that out of the way like Netanyahu
wants? Come on, guys. They're living now. Nobody's
nobody's living like that in the entire world.
Alright. We'll leave it there.
It goes on and on and on and
on the same way with no answers and
a lot of lies. Here's one quick point
that I didn't get to.
President Hayshope, you said before that The US
would buy Gaza, and today you just said
And Rubio was in the room, by the
way. This monster as well. Not going to
buy Gaza. Not gonna have to buy. We're
gonna we're gonna have Gaza. We don't have
to buy the Same question. Same answer.
We're gonna have it.
Democracy.
There's nothing to buy.
We will have Gaza. What is that? No
reason to buy.
There is nothing to buy. It's Gaza. It's
it's
a war torn area. Right. So
it's just open for taking, apparently.
Right? It's just nobody owns anything. We're just
gonna take it.
That's what he's telling you. The Palestinians that
have claimed to all of Palestine legally speaking,
but especially Gaza and the West Bank. No.
No. It's just because we're just kicking them
out of the way. There's nobody that owns
anything anymore, but we're gonna give it to
Israel.
Yeah. We're gonna take it. We're gonna hold
it. We're gonna cherish it.
We're going to This is so dumb. Get
it going eventually where a lot of jobs
are gonna be created for the people in
the Middle East. It's it's gonna Not Palestinians
though. We'll show you that next because he
already said they're not gonna be allowed to
return. Be for the people in the Middle
East, but I think it could be a
diamond. It could be an absolute,
tremendous
asset for the Middle East. And you're gonna
And what he means by that is the
power peep the powerful people that we support
in the Middle East, the powerful entities that
wanna Americanize and westernize and do whatever we
think is beneficial of our ecosystem,
not the Middle East people that currently reside
there. No. No. No. You're mistaken if you
think that.
At peace, it's gonna bring peace in the
Middle East. Gaza the way it is right
now. Every ten years, you're gonna have the
same thing happening. I've watched it so long.
And why is that? Because of Israel.
It's not like Hamas has decided every ten
years to kill people. That was clearly because
Israel decided to go after Hamas or whatever
they use as an excuse to just ex
cleanse Palestinians.
If anyone's still pretending that's not the case
with what we've seen, again, I don't think
you care to see the truth because, obviously,
Israel has been
I mean, guys, they've been proud. They've been
doing dances and videos about how they're killing
Palestinians. They've been making chants about how no
one should be left alive. It's always been
the most obvious part of this conversation.
All the death and destruction of Gaza.
The civilization's
been wiped out in Gaza.
Now it's gonna be Are so does Hamas
have the weapons to do that?
No. So there's only one thing. So either
you're okay with Israel wiping out an entire
civilization to claim to go after Hamas, even
if they meant to. Like he just said,
this is how clumsy he gets. You wiped
out an entire civilization. Hamas doesn't even have
the weapons that are capable of that.
So he just told you Israel wiped out
an entire civilization, includes their own hostages, includes
women and children and everybody else, including Americans,
by the way, including everybody.
That's okay though, because nobody cares about that.
No, get them out of the way. And
now that it's gone, we're gonna give everything
Israel wants.
But that's that's what a rules based order
looks like, in case you were confused. Yeah.
A tremendous thing is,
it's sprinting on the sea.
It's gonna be a great economic development job.
It's gonna put people to work, a lot
of people to work. And those people are
all gonna be from The Middle East. Nah.
Yeah. It's gonna be outsourced for artificial intelligence
technocratic future. Most of you probably won't, but
you'll get UBI. Don't worry. But we're not
caring about that anymore because Trump's version is
gonna be the good one. Yay.
It's it's it's slave by the technocratic world,
but Trump style with a red hat. Whoo.
Rag of frag of freedom phone.
I shouldn't make fun. I honestly, that doesn't
help with people that are might be wanting
to listen, but I'm just frustrated about it.
I'm sure you can tell. Trump says no
right of return for Palestinians in Gaza under
his plan for US ownership.
No. You don't have the right to say
that. That's not your decision to make, but
it's already clear what Trump is acting in
the interest of. Not Americans, not Palestinians. It's
pretty damn clear what's happening.
No. They would not, but you already know
that. This is the video of just simply
saying, will they have the right return? No.
They wouldn't. There's just really no this it's
you can't misunderstand that. These people
are being ethnically cleansed.
We'll build beautiful communities for the 1,900,000
people. We'll build beautiful communities, safe This is
my point about this, guys. God, it's so
funny to me.
Now it's not just watching social media. Let's
be real. They are surveilling us using all
sorts of things well beyond just tapping into
what people say on Twitter. But do you
notice how rapidly reactive I keep saying it
was Israeli propaganda.
They came out and said 1.7
many, many times in a succession of interviews,
which shows you that they have that number
from their intelligence, which then accidentally revealed they've
killed
300,000
plus people. That's disgustingly crazy. Right? And since
people started making that point, you've seen him
slowly go 1.8. Now he says 1.9 in
the series of, like, a day and a
half interviews.
Somebody got his ear and said, oop. Don't
say that anymore. That's my opinion.
I mean, it could be five, six, could
be two,
but we'll build safe, beautiful communities for the
1,900,000
people. We'll build beautiful communities, safe communities. Could
be five, six, could be two,
but we'll build safe communities. Five, six, or
two. You pick. Five communities, six communities, two
we'll we'll we'll figure it out. A little
bit away from where they are, where all
of this danger is. In the meantime, I
would
own this. Think of it as a real
estate development for the future.
It would be a beautiful piece of land.
Would the Palestinians have a right to be
returned?
No. They wouldn't because they're gonna have much
better housing, much See you see how gross
that is?
If they're if you're if you're giving a
better location, some of them would want to
they would prefer to stay in their home
territory. You're simply going, no. No. No. They
don't have that right because we're giving them
that's not how you frame that. The point
would be we're giving them beautiful places, so
they're not gonna wanna come back. But you
just said they don't have the right to
come back. And even the Fox News guy
has the nerve can ask that because it's
a it's a legal reality that no one
can deny. They have been denied the right
to return
that has been on the table since Israel
agreed to this secession of violence and they
never stopped doing that. Or the 67 borders,
the different accords they've made. Every time you
can prove they deliberately sabotage it like we're
gonna finish with today in the recent version.
And they're proudly telling you that now. They
know they violate it and they don't care
because I think they think they're well beyond
accountability at this point. I'd like to believe
they're wrong, but it's I'm concerned with where
it seems to be going. But he asked,
do they have the right term? No. No.
They don't because we'll build something nice.
Like, that makes my skin crawl. Like, not
just like I've said every time we talk
about this, not just the bad thing, but
doing the bad thing while acting like you
deserve praise for it. Like, what you're doing
is some humanitarian effort while you're committing genocide.
That is, like, the thing that keeps me
up at night because those people are everywhere.
Better in other words, I'm talking about building
a permanent,
place for them because if they have to
return that That's called Palestine, Trump. Now it'll
be years before you could ever. It's not
habitable. That's their choice. And it's only that
way because of you and Israel. I mean,
you being the United States government.
It'll be years before it could happen. I'm
talking about And by the way, you know
why that's happening? Because Israel has continued to
sabotage efforts to allow things in that could
help them rebuild and have deliberately been destroying
it, like rolling through the streets and tearing
up the the streets with those machines
just to make it that much more impossible
for them to rebuild
because they knew this point would come where
they would rationalize, well, they're not gonna be
able to because of what we did. So
let them go out of the. It's disgusting
how clearly they've mapped this out. This is
the most mapped out planned genocide I've ever
seen in my life. Starting to build, and
I think I could make a deal with
Jordan. I think I could make a deal
with Egypt. You know, we give them billions
and billions of dollars a year. You see,
because we're gonna force them using our economic
manipulation.
Not the same thing. But Egypt has at
least stated that he's rejected the plan, and
we'll see what happens.
Oh, actually, you know what? I'm believing oh,
that's the foreign minister.
Anyway, Egypt has said that's not gonna happen,
which has been pretty clear. Now David Icke
highlighting him speak and the king of Jordan
basically ending by saying, I believe that, you
know, this is gonna be bring prosperity to
all of us with what what Trump's doing.
And he says, Jordan and Egypt are caving
to the Israel owned bully. You know, it's
funny how he calls them bully. There's a
reason he did that.
And what do Palestinians think?
None of these psychopaths could give an s
h I t regard to Egypt, Jordan, Trump.
I tell you what, MAGA, he says, let's
all cheer at ethnic cleansing made possible by
Israel dropping state of the art weapons supplied
by America
on defense of civilians and kids. This turns
Gaza into a demolition site which is now
used as excuse me, hiccups all of a
sudden,
as the excuse
for the ethnic cleansing that has been the
plan all along. Excuse me. I'm so sorry
to talk through hiccup right there. It sounded
funny.
Gosh, I did. It happens all the time
for me. I think it's the
talking for this long
happened during the show towards the end.
But
defenseless kids
turning Gaza into demolition site, being the plan
all along, quote, we're winning. Right?
They keep trying to say that. You are
shameless and caught in mass psychosis.
You know, like the one you accuse others
of being in during COVID. Now it's you,
but you can't see it or you don't
care. I added that last part. You have
allowed professional liars and con men, Trump and
Musk, to seize control of your minds.
Wake the hell up.
Or you won't hold my breath. Now I'm
still of the mind. He's speaking to the
minority of the conversation that's being represented as
the majority.
I really do believe that. It's something that
I just say. But I really do think
that we're seeing that in a lot of
ways. But overall, his point is accurate.
The same thing with the Woke Right and
all these different things, guys, it's the same
thing reversed. They've just designed this to be
this is your version of it. And you're
lockstep in this agenda with people that are
rolling you into exactly what we've been calling
out. That's what I believe.
Drop site news highlights what Hamas said in
regard to all this. This was on the
eleventh. It says, aren't this is in regard
to The US President's statements regarding the displacement.
It says, we we reiterate our rejection of
the statements of US title president Trump regarding
the displacement of our people from Gaza Strip
under the pretext of reconstruction, because it is
a pretext. And they're they're only gonna reconstruct
for the Israeli settlement they're gonna build. Trump's
statements are racist and a call for ethnic
cleansing with the aim of liquidating the Palestinian
cause, that's the right of return, and denying
the established national rights of our people.
The plan and, really, truthfully, the Palestinian cause,
I mean, what would Palestinian identity be after
that?
Because I guarantee you what they're gonna do
is put them in places that already exist
as a nation.
So you're gonna carve out territory from somebody
else's nation? No. You're gonna give them places
inside Jordan, Egypt where they can live in
settlements. So they're gonna be refugees for the
rest of their lives, which is, by the
way, what Israel's already done to them.
The plan to deport our people from Gaza
will not succeed, they say, and we will
confront and will be confronted with a unified
Palestinian, Arab, and Islamic position that rejects all
displacement plans. I hope so. Our great people
in Gaza have stood firm in the face
of the bombing and aggression and will remain
steadfast in their land and will thwart all
plans to displaced and forced deportation.
What the occupation failed to achieve through aggression
and massacres
if it will not succeed
in achieving through liquidation and displacement plans. Hamas
is committed to the ceasefire agreement.
If the occupation is committed to the agreement,
which they're not, that's very clear, they've broken
it every single day since it started. We
can prove it. Which was sponsored and guaranteed
by the mediators, Egypt, Qatar, and The United
States, which really don't care about holding Israel
accountable, and witnessed by the international community, which
many have spoken up about but doesn't seem
to make a difference. We confirm that the
occupation is the party that did not abide
by the commitments, and it bears responsibility for
any complications or delays,
which is what we promised
was gonna happen because they told you it
would happen.
Now here's Orwell highlighting what what Trump let
out of the bag, and she simply shows
you the meme where it says, they told
me I could be anything I wanted, so
I became Israel's B I T C H.
She says, sums it up.
Here is what he said, again, the Fox
interview. I just want you to hear this
part of it. All the big talk and
bluster about The US involved, it's and it
seems like it turns out, at least so
far, to be what people expected.
The the narrative about taking over Gaza when
all you really do is just allow it
so it may that's just the construct when
all you're doing is letting Israel take control.
Here's what he says right out of his
own mouth. Pushback from The Middle East. What
do you think? I don't understand. Much pushback.
A lot of people thought it was a
great idea. Really. He's talking about the the
displacement plan. No. They didn't, guys. Only people
who are Zionist maniacs and people invested in
this agenda. Seems like everyone in the world
was, like, aghast about how horrible that was.
A lot of people. And I'm not talking
about big money for the I just think
it it would be stabilized if The United
States owns the Gaza Strip. If people aren't
living in the Gaza Strip and Hamas isn't
there because nobody's there, people aren't there, nobody's
gonna be there, and later on it can
be developed,
you'll give some to Saudi Arabia. So you're
not saying US troops? No. You don't need
new no. Israel will watch it Mhmm. Because
it's right next to Israel. Oh, it's a
time frame. You have a time frame? I
would say let it start almost immediately.
Right. Israel can take it all. Almost exactly
like they've been trying to do for seventy
six years, but it's just a coincidence though.
We'll own it.
Well, you owning at this point seems like
Israel. That's what I would argue. But either
way, I doubt that's even what happens. You're
just gonna let Israel roll in like with
Syria. Like, didn't US occupy Syria? What happens
now?
Is The US in control of Syria or
did Israel sweep in, build bases, deploy military,
and allow that terrorist force they've both been
funding to take control? Israel's in control of
Syria.
Whether or not The US has a has
basis, and it's obvious what's going on. So
in this case, he just told you, Israel
will control it.
Maybe they'll pretend to own it or they'll
both jointly be in the same agenda because
I think we're dealing with the same thing
here, guys.
So here's another clip
in regard and we're gonna finish with the
ceasefire overlap, which shouldn't be that long. Just
showing you the updates and how we knew
this was gonna come to pass because they
told you it would.
Here's Trump playing the game.
This was on the February 9, okay, where
he comes out and goes, oh my god.
And you see the people that were released?
They're emaciated. He says, emaciated.
Well, you know why he's saying that? Because
that's what Israel's propaganda narrative became.
You can't miss this, guys. So either he's
only uniquely looking at specifically Israeli propaganda, which
I can wrap my mind around, which, again,
you don't think he's got access to intelligence
where they know all of this stuff, all
of the procession
of dead and emaciated,
tortured, and raped, and beaten people coming out
of their 10,000 strong
administrative detention prison for children and women alike,
whether or not they were ever charged with
a crime. Some people coming out after twenty
years with not a single charge.
A kid arrested while a child comes out,
a grown man.
That that's not enough for Trump. Emaciated,
burn holes in his legs that go in
two inches. No. No. No. That's okay. But
these people come out and don't look emaciated.
That's a lie. The three we showed you,
they look
less fed.
Even though every other one before that have
not been more of it, they were completely
fed, that one actually gained weight. And they
told you it's because they were fed and
treated nice, so did these three people, by
the way. They said they were treated kindly.
And we also know that Israel deliberately starved
everybody in the West Bank or well, that
too now, but in Gaza. And all he
has the nerve to say is what Israel
clearly told him to say. Those three people
look like the holocaust.
We can't allow that.
So I guess it only matters when specifically
Israelis look like that or you pretend they
look like that. Not American hostages in Gaza,
not Palestinians in Gaza, not Palestinians
in Israel where they have lots of food.
No. No. No. Those don't matter.
It's so obvious.
Hamas has been a disaster. And by the
way, I have to tell you that Hamas,
the Israel funds and supports up until October
7. I wish to pretend that's not true.
I watched
the hostages come back today,
and they look like holocaust
survivors.
They were
in horrible condition. It almost seemed to me,
it almost kinda sound like you know how
Trump speaks and the way he act? It
sounds to me like he's repeating something he
was told to say. Just my opinion.
They were emaciated.
It looked like many years ago, the Holocaust
survivors.
And
I don't know how much longer we can
take that when I watch that. I know
we have a deal where we're supposed to
get they dribble in and keep dribbling in,
but they are in really bad shape. They
have been treated brutally.
No. They haven't, in fact, as they told
you. And he knows. I guarantee
it. They were not. They were treated kindly.
They were they they were able to play
games. They were given food unlike the people
in Gaza, by the way, in many cases
where children have starved to death, where million
plus people are currently at famine level according
to the IPC.
That's because they wouldn't allow food in even
though they're doing it now. The point is
that Israel has lots of food, and still
they're starving people deliberately and raping and torturing
them according to everybody with a brain and
eyes. But Trump apparently was, no. No. No.
No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No.
No. No. No. No. No. No. No gonna
make a point about what Israel told me
to make a point about. Horribly.
Even the ones that came out earlier, they
were in a little bit better shape. But
No. No. They weren't in a little bit
better shape. They were completely fed and taken
care of. And even some of them were
given, taken shopping. Some of them were literally,
they told you themselves that the idea or
the the Hamas were covering them with their
bodies while the IDF bombed them.
How do you make sense of that with
what they're saying? You know they're lying, and
you could back it up with what the
hostages
still to this moment say.
This is again why it's so frustrating to
have this conversation. How do you actually hear
all that and then look at it and
see it for yourself and still pretend like
they're not just liars?
Because they are. The people saying those things.
Not all Jews or Israelis, but the liars
are saying them. It's incredible.
Or that they pretend they're not doing x,
y, and z, and then you watch a
video of the IDF members dancing and making
a video about how they do x, y,
and z. And we just go, you're racist.
I'm telling you guys, the effing world across
the board sees this, and we are being
led by maniacs and psychopaths that have clearly
taken control of our government.
Mentally, they were treated so badly. Who could
who could take that? Nope. That's also not
true. So I'll play that for the last
part. Badly. Who could who the ones that
came out earlier, they were in a little
bit better shape, but Nope. Mentally, they were
treated so badly. Nope. No. They weren't. They
weren't mentally treated badly. They told you they
were treated kindly. They told you they were
fed. The first one, Lifshifts, that came out
even followed up again and told you that
they were treated kindly, took care of them,
and that they know that they even refused
the bodies of the Bebas family. They're still
pretending aren't there. All of this is public.
He is a liar,
or
I guess you could argue he's being threatened.
But he's not I think you know he
knows that's not true.
Who could take that?
You know, at some point,
we're gonna lose our patience.
Oh. When I see that scene Sounds like
a bully. That I saw today with people
coming out
of helicopters and airplanes that are emaciated.
Nope. That looked like they haven't had a
meal in a month.
And if that was the case, why would
that be Donald Trump? I'm sure you could
piece it together.
No reason for that, and I don't know
how much longer we can take it. Do
you mean you wanna be cast I don't
know how long we can take it. When
I watch I love it's so funny.
That happens often where somebody goes to ask
a different question and he just goes, I
don't know how long we're gonna take it,
and just rolls back over at the same
point. It's like, okay. Just keep talking.
Either because he senses it's not something he
wants to answer or whatever. It's just funny
to me. I know you guys all see
these things. It's just funny how people are
so willing to, you know, pretend because
and so people walk on eggshells around the
partisan field. It's so funny to me.
People that were healthy people,
a reasonably short number of years ago, and
you look at them today,
they were taken. Years ago.
How much before October 7 before before they
were taken? I mean, you can't piece that
together in your in your brain? Twenty five
years.
They they
they literally look like the old pictures of
holocaust. Yeah. Yeah. We got it, Trump. We
got it. You were told to repeat the
holocaust. We get it. Now here's what one
actually looks like. That
that is actually an emaciated person. That is
somebody who was released. And look at his
picture. Look at that picture next to him.
That's what he looked like when he was
taken by Israel for no reason. He wasn't
charged with a crime. He's not a terrorist.
In fact, he's a teacher.
And that's what he looks like now.
And if, you know, if you listen, he
was tortured. He was burned. He was that's
what happens.
And you're gonna pretend that the people they
released, which by the way are healthy,
maybe slightly lost some weight. If you actually
look at the overlap, and they still tell
you they were treated kindly, and Trump can
do nothing but lie to you because that's
the game.
But here's a Sol Rod making the point
as always. Israel says publicly we're blocking food
to Gaza.
Starving everyone is moral and just, and they
have their settler movements having dance you know,
destroying them, burning trucks, and tearing it down.
Right. No food, no water, no fuel. All
public. Right? Also, Israel, we can't believe our
people didn't get enough food. It's a crime
against humanity.
This is why, again, it's frustrating to pretend
like that this is even a real conversation.
Does is anybody confused about that? How did
they were supposed to get food if you
made sure food didn't go in? And I've
showed you that every single day that trucks
going in were deliberately pulled back to basically
nothing.
Now just because they're rushing it in, and
I'll I'll actually, I'll point that out in
a second because they're doing that based on
the ceasefire back and forth, which we'll end
with right here. Here's another example, by the
way. And these aren't even some of the
most graphic or hard to look at. And
you've seen them on this show. But this
is another person who came out from the
Israeli prisons as a hostage who was not
charged with a crime, lost my hearing because
I was electrocuted behind my ear.
And let's not forget the obvious conversation of
rape and torture, which anybody can look up
for themselves. I'll include just the most obvious.
The Israeli human rights group, B'Tselem,
who wrote an article called Welcome to Hell.
And, yes, it talks about rape and torture
inside the Sid Tiamen Prison where they were
raped and tortured.
The Israeli prison system has a network of
torture camps.
That's not an old one. This is recent,
guys. This was put out.
Where was it?
It's not dates near somewhere. This was pretty
much at right after the the rape discussion.
That's an Israeli human rights group.
But I guess we're still just gonna pretend
it's not there. That's why it is infuriating
to have this conversation.
But he was tortured.
Really, he reveals the details after his release
after fourteen months in captivity.
No crime. No charge. Just picked you up
because you're there and Palestinian, and we torture
you just because.
Now
this was two days ago.
Hamas spoke up and said, we're postponing, not
stopping, but just postponing the the next hostage
release
because Israel keeps breaking the deal. And they
had been since the moment this started.
Anybody at the brain can see that? And
now, again, what's funny is, had I not
jumped ahead, you'd people in the chat maybe
there'd be people in the chat right now
or in the conversation going, that's not true.
You're a racist. It's Hamas that did everything,
and they've probably still been doing that now.
Despite despite the fact that Israel's people have
already admitted that this was accurate.
We'll get there.
But let's make sure we remember that on
May 7, this is just one of the
early we've this goes back to the first
week of this, that even times of Israel
admitted on the ninth and the tenth after
October 7, they refused two. Israel refused
two full exchanges
because they were not focused on they they
made it clear. Actually, I'm not even be
able to bring that up.
One of them anyway.
There it is.
It's one of the videos anyway. This is
CBC news.
What's the date? Four about one year ago.
Right? So pretty much October. This was right
after like, this was the first month.
Defeating Hamas is priority.
Everything else is secondary, says Israel.
I'll include it. Watch it for yourself.
And they got really
their own people rightly got mad at them,
and so they walked that back and pretended
like the hostages are the focus even though
they never were, and you can easily prove
that. They did not care. They refused the
full exchange because they didn't want it. They
needed this dynamic to use it for what's
currently happening.
This really does need to speak more and
more to the whether this was all planned
from the start, which we've always considered because
of how obviously there was I mean, guys,
just the it was nine eleven style holes
in the story.
But on May 11 was one of the
many after that. Hamas agreed to the ceasefire.
Right? They did after but Blinken went on
a tour claiming that all they had to
do was accept and it'd be over. They
accept and Israel attacks Rafa
because they never wanted it to end.
Then, June 2, Israel once again refuses their
own ceasefire deal after Hamas accepts. All very
easy to prove because the same things happened.
Then
June January 15, before this last ceasefire went
into place. And what did we title it?
The new ceasefire agreement Israel already plans to
break. Now remember, why? We weren't guessing because
Netanyahu even suggested
didn't say it explicitly that we have the
right to break the deal, but he said
that they said they could if Hamas does
x, y, and z. But then you listen
to people in the Knesset, which is usually
how clumsy they are because they like projecting
that they can control and do whatever they
want, or we can sovereign. We can legislate
anywhere in the world. I just did the
show about that. They believe that.
Sao international law does not apply to them.
They've said it more than once.
My point is that in the Knesset, in
the in the Congress of Israel, they were
saying, Trump told us we could break the
deal in the second phase, which is where
we are now.
I told you that then. I proved it
to you then. Multiple Israeli articles covered that.
This is why this conversation is so stupid.
So they're telling you, we're gonna do this.
And then we go, okay. Well, here's what
they said. Let's wait and see. And here
we are. Boom. They break it. And what
they do? The same thing they said they
could say. Hamas did it. Even though we
can prove they didn't do that. Even though
Israel's not presented any evidence to show that
they broke anything. They're in fact using Hamas
pausing based on their violations to claim that's
the violation.
How stupid is all this? But we went
through it, and it was clear that they
made a deal. They can annex the West
Bank as long as Trump got this momentary
victory to pretend he's the peace president by
ushering in a ceasefire which was designed to
fail.
It's as simple as
that. Then we followed up, of course, on
January 16,
and this was the Robert's article about this.
The Gaza ceasefire, a US Israel defeat or
another trick? Well, we know now. And then
I followed up on the twenty first after
it had started, and I simply highlighted Israel
had already repeatedly violated the ceasefire. And, of
course, the AI technocracy
bait and switch, Doge deception,
all these are in the show notes.
Now here is February 11, Jerry Skahill in
drop site news. Hamas has shared a report,
which you can verify for yourself. You're never
gonna get something like this from Israel because
it doesn't exist
on the key Israeli violations of the ceasefire.
Many of which you have on video, guys.
They list 22 different violations, and these are
things you can document and prove. There's a
lot more than that.
Jeremy Scales simply says, as it has been
for fifteen months,
the narrative about who is obstructing a god's
ceasefire is upside down. Don't forget,
Bank of Veer came out and publicly made
a huge thing about how he is determined
and he made sure that these things were
sabotaged.
And Netanyahu has also been clear about that,
that they got caught doing it. It's again,
I say that right now 45 times a
second because it's that stupid. If they're telling
you that they made sure, then why are
we debating that with idiots in The United
States?
Because we're either lying for them or you're
lost in some propaganda narrative. Because, you know,
the same thing to talk about all day
today.
But he says, since the ceasefire officially went
into effect January 19, Israel has repeatedly violated
it by shooting and killing Palestinians.
By the way, just like it in Lebanon
that Craig Murray documented from day one, and
nobody called out because the Lebanese government's lockstep
with Israel and the US government is too.
Same with the media, apparently.
And no. I don't even I don't think
they would even reported that.
And now they never pulled back like they're
supposed to, and just nobody cares. Now they're
overtaking the West Bank. Syria's gone.
Freedom, apparently.
And says Israel and what about elections and
all that? Aren't we supposed to scream democracy?
I guess Haiti doesn't get one because we
like that situation. Syria can't have them because
we got our power there. We'll always scream
for democracy when it's in places we don't
like, the people that don't do what we
tell them to do.
It says Israel repeatedly violated it by shooting
and killing them
and withholding aid. They have been. Now here's
the important part.
Up until the last so many days or
the very first day, they they did. They
were pulling back aid like they've been doing
the entire time, and they were calling it
out.
But they started by dumping a bunch in
there by, see, see, which all that showed
you was that they were the only reason
it was never going in because if Hamas
was gonna stop it, they would have stopped
it then too. Right? No. Because Israel had
been holding it back, and we all know
that. And now they did lastly, last couple
of last few days, they were dealt with
a lot of aid in there to cover
the story, but I'll we'll get there. But
he goes through a lot of it. They
Christine Brigades announced it would postpone the next
release of three Israeli captives in the protest
of these violations. Hamas said it gave advanced
warning so the mediators could compel Israel to
abide by the terms. Israel doesn't care. They
act like they don't know, so they can
go, woah, we're outraged.
And this was all planned out.
Hamas said that it has documented Israeli violations,
which he gave you a link to,
In issuing his threats to cancel the ceasefire
and unleash hell on Gaza, Donald Trump did
not acknowledge any of Israel's repeated violations of
the ceasefire.
Instead, he continued the blinking Biden practice of
unilaterally blaming Hamas.
See? Because they're the same thing.
And here's the article from DropSiteNews, which you
should check out for yourself.
Doctor Ishmael
Al Tawabada or or Pobat Pobada,
yeah, spokesperson for Gaza's government media office said
that the Israeli occupation committed more than 265
violations. Of course, people that wanna ignore it
will pretend that means Hamas and they're lying,
which you could argue whenever you want. The
facts are always pretty clear, and that would
be you just choosing to ignore it without
looking into it, which shows you that you've
made your mind up, which shows you you're
not honest. He explained the violations include ground
incursions, shootings, and killings. Again, guys,
IDF members posted videos of some of this
stuff. And just they they really are laughing.
They think they're unaccountable.
Maybe they're right. I certainly hope we're gonna
prove them wrong.
Aliyah Budamah points out that at least a
18
Palestinians have been killed in Gaza during the
so called ceasefire
by direct Israeli fire, unexplored ordinance, and from
other injuries.
Palestinian lives have zero value to the sponsors
of the genocide regime. Here's an article. You
check it out for yourself.
Patrick Henningkson then gets into the part that
I thought was most important, and so does
Ali Abunam, Ali Abunamal, by the way, by
the way, excuse me, Which is that the
New York Times quoted Israeli
entities
telling you that we know this is accurate.
Confirm, Patrick says. Israel has intentionally sabotaged the
deal. Now I wouldn't say it's confirmed based
on New York Times citing anonymous Israeli sources.
Like, I wouldn't say that for any other
dynamic
because that's equal application of logic.
But I would say that it has been
roundly confirmed 45 times over. So I agree
with that. They have been sabotaging the ceasefire
deal. Netanyahu has admitted it publicly
and says this is why Netanyahu went to
Washington to arrange a reboot of the genocide
in Gaza. Trump himself said he will now
unleash hell on the Palestinian population. That's what
I was saying earlier, by the way.
That's not Hamas, guys. He's talking about the
Palestinians. So how do you pretend that's not
the same thing?
And here's Mohammed Shehada. That's what his name
was. I remember that off the cuff the
other day.
And the point is what it says right
here in the article, and I'll show you
next. Ali Buenamal pointing out the same thing.
Israeli officials briefing New York Times that Hamas'
charge Hamas' charges that Israel violated the ceasefire
are accurate.
In other words, Israel continues
to commit crimes.
Here's the article.
Trump to meet Jordan's King. That's what happened.
We just reported on it today. Here's the
actual point.
It says the current standoff stems in part
from Hamas' accusation that Israel has not upheld
its promises. So you get the idea that
New York Times is not capable of looking
at all the same data we are, all
the same videos, the IDF members posting how
they did these things.
You know, it's just sad. It shows you
that they also are dishonest even if they
show things like this.
But it goes, has not upheld his promises
for the first phase of the ceasefire. Israel
was required
to send hundreds of thousands of tents into
Gaza, a promise Hamas says Israel has not
kept. Guys, you could prove they did not.
Speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss
a sensitive matter,
three Israeli officials
and two mediators
said that Hamas' claims were accurate. Think about
that.
Now this is New York Times.
I'd never would blindly take anything at face
value you couldn't verify,
but they have, you know, ultimately, New York
Times would be somebody that could put this
story out.
Like, let me put it this way.
Typically supportive of the mainstream discussion. Right? And
so if they're putting this out and claiming
that, it challenges them. It's interesting to consider
at the very least. I think what we
can see is regardless of this claim that
it is very easily true, provable.
And what we're seeing now is I think
an indication of people that are
feel that what they're doing is destroying
everything they are. Even if they want the
genocide, they just think doing it like this
is gonna hurt their long term agenda. And
that's been public in their conversation. And so
they're coming out and going, we gotta stop
this.
But here's the part we that we've talked
about a lot. Cogat,
the Israeli intelligence unit, but pretends to be
about humanitarian aid, which has been caught lying
50 times over. And the main one I
always show you is about them lying about
bread coming from a factory or a bakery
that was destroyed a month before they made
the post.
And we make this we've shown this many
times. Of course. So these people say that.
Cogat comes out because their job is propaganda
and says that's a lie. Hundreds of thousands
of tents have entered Gaza since the beginning
of the agreement as well as fuel and
generators. Well, some of that's true, but they
stopped doing what they were required to do.
So they gave some and then stopped because
it was an illusion.
But it goes regardless, officials and commentators say
the dispute can be resolved
relatively easily.
How?
If Israel allows more aid.
But guess what? Israel goes, no. That's their
fault. We're gonna go back to the war
because Trump already told us we could.
That's what's happening.
So even New York Times is like, well,
they could just give aid. It'll be good.
Right? No. Because they don't want to.
Sole and child.
Now following Al Qasim's announcement of halting the
release of the hostages, guess what?
Israelis in Tel Aviv marched through the streets
blaming the Israeli government.
Now you can this is not a hard
thing. People don't wanna admit this. It's been
going on most of this entire time. Months
into this, they were protesting that they were
killing their own hostages, but we know that's
true
because they knew they were there and they
were bombing. And they also now know that
there were deals. They refused.
So these people are going I think they
know very clearly that their Israeli government is
making this happen. Now here's Netanyahu on the
eleventh after Trump gave them the opening, which
I think was all included in design.
Netanyahu said, I have just finished an in-depth
four hour security cabinet meeting. We have all
we all expressed outrage
over the shocking state of the three hostage
who were released. You see the point? That's
why Trump said that because you're building a
narrative that they were starved. Well, if they
were starved at all, it's because you didn't
let the food in. But we're gonna pretend
like that's not obvious.
Or the fact that they weren't as starved
as anybody else you've seen coming out of
any other part of the situation
from their prisons in Israel, from the people
they starve in Gaza. And look, if you
look I should've grabbed the pictures honestly. I
don't wanna find it right now. We showed
you the last show. They weren't emaciated.
They were thinner than they were before. Emaciated
is what I showed you a second ago.
Or the people that they
the dead children that are dying in the
streets of Gaza. Right?
But this is what they wanted to build.
That's why the the the clompuses of the
world, the hemazigs, they all round they ran
to the story, and they were lying in
unison.
Eli David and
all of them. All of them. Guys, if
you go day by day, they're all sharing
the same things. It's not hard to see.
He says, we all welcome president Trump's demand
to release the hostages. This is in unison.
Saturday noon as well, and we'll all be
welcome so the point is, if they don't
do it by noon by Saturday,
then we're gonna go back to the war.
Now how much you wanna bet even if
they do, they'll still do it?
They're gonna find a justification. They're gonna say,
that's the wrong person or the Bebas family's
dead even though they know that already and
they're the ones that killed them.
My prediction on top of the what we're
already correct about here is that they're gonna
justify it because that was the deal that
was already made. It says in light of
Hamas' announcement regarding his decision to violate the
agreement, that's not what's happening, and to re
and not release the hostages, that is true,
but they're pausing.
Again, you could all make this semantics. Don't
get they stopped. Right? Which in and of
itself alone would be considered a violation. But
if Israel's been violating this murdering people, killing
people, shopping aid every day since, why did
it take them this long to call it
out? Maybe they're all working together. Who knows?
And it says, last night, I instructed the
IDF to amass forces inside and surrounding the
Gaza Strip. Oh my god. How unpredictable. Who
didn't see this coming? This action is being
carried out this hour and will be completed
very soon. Says the unanimous decision that I
passed,
if Hamas does not return our hostage by
Saturday noon, the ceasefire will end. And the
IDF will resume intense fighting and a final
defeat of Hamas. Oh, because you're holding off
on that? You failed to do it for
a month, a month, a year and a
half, but now you're just gonna do it
like that? Because no. They're gonna they what
they're gonna do
is what they've been doing, which is just
bomb everything, which will kill the hostages that
are still there, shows you they don't care
about that. It's obvious, guys. This is about
the continued agenda. And to make that even
more clear, here's Smotrich.
He threatens to, get this, apply sovereignty, in
quotes, in Gaza if the captives are harmed.
I guarantee you he's gonna reference the Bibas
family. I should even look if they mention
that. No. Not in this article. If they're
harmed
So they're already setting you up to make
some kind of an out what if they're
harmed? So what if they have an injury
that they sustained because of bombings that you
carried out? All they're doing is setting this
up to pretend now we have to apply
sovereignty, which is that's these are the people
that tell you that they can apply sovereignty
anywhere in the world. That's their quote. That
the international law does not apply to them,
also their quote.
So all they're doing is running with the
narrative. They already knew they could break it.
Trump already gave them the allowance. Now they're
gonna tell you this this thing and whatever,
they'll make it into whatever they want, we'll
have to apply sovereign to Gaza, which was
always the plan.
Always.
It is so clumsy and obvious. And, of
course, same day. Right? Now they've set the
narrative out. Now that Netanyahu and they've given
the marching orders, Department of State, so Rubio
comes out and says, there's not there's not
going to be peace in the Middle East
as long as a group like Hamas
physically controls territory and is the most dominant
power in Gaza or anywhere in the Middle
East.
Hamas is pure evil, Senator Rubio.
Right. And I said,
the Hamas
that Israel funds?
That Hamas?
Same thing every time.
You'll never you know, it's it's funny how
little this gets how is this not obvious?
If you're gonna pretend it's evil, then shouldn't
it matter that Israel on the record has
funded this group?
You'd think so, wouldn't you? And I'll play
it again, even though you guys have seen
it millions of times. It's important to hear
it for those that have not.
This is a fact.
So are you saying Benjamin Netanyahu deliberately boosted
Hamas to try to prevent a Palestinian state?
Yeah. Sure. He deliberately
and systematically
even even told this on record whoever
wants to avoid
the threat
of a two state solution
has to support my policy of paying protection
money to the Hamas. So what we did,
with the permission of our prime minister is
Umrik Sheben.
To let
Qatar
to transfer
a huge amount of money in cash,
probably more than $1,400,000,000.
By doing it, we increase the power of
Hamas.
We
did everything in order to make sure that
Hamas will go on controlling Gaza,
and Palestinian authority
will control the West Bank so they will
fight each other.
How is it possible that could be so
public or that they even say that on,
you know, I mean, mainstream interviews?
You know why, guys? Because we're dishonest circumstance
here, and our government is not on the
side of the truth or the people. Any
of them, it seems. Here's Rubio carrying out
through his position as secretary of state an
Israeli agenda. America First, though, will pretend. Right?
He's trying to create this narrative because what
they're doing is acting like this has to
end. We're back to day one here. We
can't this won't be over until Hamas is
annihilated. That was that that's what they said.
Remember? Secondary. Hostage, secondary. It's all about Hamas
because it's only about keeping the genocide going,
destroying everything that's ever been Palestinian. Now West
Bank as well. That's what's happening.
How are you gonna pretend? And let's not
forget, here again, this is from Haaretz,
the Israeli newspaper from October 9,
'2 days after October 7. Anyone who wants
to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state
has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money
to Hamas. That's not aid, guys. How do
we misunderstand that? This is part of our
strategy. You just heard him say it. We
have to keep them divided. So we don't
allow a two state solution despite telling the
world that we want it so bad, but
they hate Jews and they won't let it
happen.
If you care at all about the facts,
it's objectively
clear.
Or
up in this was 2020.
Sent that's what he just referenced. The Mossad
chief sent to continue funding Hamas because that's
how they funneled it through. It's obvious. And,
yes, the data shows that it went right
up until October 7, which by the way,
even if they funded every part of Hamas,
does not still invalidate the act of armed
resistance. It doesn't. It's a legally protected act
by any group from Palestine
against an an illegal occupier, which is Israel.
No matter what you just wanna scream, it
is an objective truth.
But here's our government telling you they're fighting
for a foreign government at the expense of
everything they've ever pretended they care about. That
should be alarming to people.
Now Mossad commentary
simply shows you what Trump said here about
make makes dramatic announcement. If all hostage are
not released by Saturday noon,
the ceasefire will be canceled, and we'll release
hell on all civilians and their own hostage,
by the way.
If Egypt and Jordan refused to accept it,
he may stop aid to them, he says.
And, again, now we come full circle back
to the main point of when he already
told you before we even got here. That
was the first thing I showed you. Remember,
he said we're gonna end both wars on
day one. Obviously, neither happened.
But what then the first thing I saw
was he then told Netanyahu he would stop
the aid. And we said, well, there you
go. And he goes, well, it's too early
to jump to yeah. I didn't say I
knew for sure, but I said there's a
earliest indication that this is where we are.
And now they're using this the set up
circumstance that they're gonna use as an excuse
to stop. Why would you stop aid?
How does that make sense unless you're clearly
showing that you're fighting all Palestinians?
So Hamas changes the deal, and then you
stop aid to innocent people, including hostages, and
then you wonder why they're starving? I mean,
guys, it's so stupid.
Are there any honest people that actually believe
what they're saying?
I find that hard to believe. Of law
office, president Trump said if all Gaza Hostages
are not returned
to Israel by Saturday at noon, he would
cancel the ceasefire
and adding it is up to Israel.
Now how exactly does he cancel the ceasefire?
Why does Donald Trump have the unilateral power
to cancel the ceasefire? It shows you that
we're being lied to. It's an illusion.
Michael Tracy simply adds, Trump now says that
unless Hamas releases all of them by Saturday
noon, something like high noon to that dynamic,
Israel may resume the war and let all
hell break out. He goes, looks like he's
intentionally blowing up the ceasefire framework shortly after
transferring 2,000 pound bombs to Netanyahu.
Of course. Now just overlapping to wrap up
here with West Bank and everything else, it's
not going away. And this is what your
government,
the US government, and wherever you are in
the world, if your government supports this, is
what they're allowing.
They know what they're involved in, guys, and
we have to be really clear about how
alarming that is. This is a big deal,
and it's not just one government.
Israeli occupation forces are now forcing families out
of their homes
in a in a refugee camp in the
West Bank as Israeli military continues to assault
on the camp for the seventh day in
a row.
Since the February 2, they've been look at
these people. That does that look familiar to
you? It should. It's what they did in
Gaza.
Now in the West Bank, where there's not
Hamas,
they are rolling these people out. Look at
the crib just sitting in the middle of
the dirt. They are occupying ethnically cleansing, destroying
every sense of everything Palestine,
which is what they tell you if you
actually care to listen to them.
And Francesca Albanese, UN's best rapporteur, says self
righteousness
and impunity combined are the propeller of an
illegal occupier's sense of entitlement, destroy peoples in
their own land.
Eye of Palestine points out the Israeli occupation
army
executed a Palestinian girl, Rafael Aksha Ashkar,
in the Nur Shams refugee camp in the
West Bank.
This was on the twelfth. This was posted
today. This was not the first crime, but
rather part about the cleansing, which have intensified
following the expansion of the open fire orders
in the West Bank. They're firing openly on
civilians, guys. It's very clear. I've been reporting
this for weeks. As reported by the Israeli
newspaper, Haaretz.
Right? So right right up until then, I
guarantee the Zionists were pretending that, oh, you're
listening to Palestine. They knew no. It's Israeli
media. And still then, you'll probably call them
racist or something because you guys are ridiculous.
Has Haaretz also documented the Israeli occupation army's
use of Palestinian civilians as human shields to
search buildings during a large scale military assault.
They called it the mosquito procedure.
Right? They're just continuing to do the same
things right in plain daylight.
Israeli occupation forces have also did that detonated
buildings full of people in Southern Lebanon.
Every day, we keep seeing this.
And I mean, this is Craig Murray's on
the ground highlighting this stuff. Buildings full of
people being executed. Nobody says a word.
That's what scares me the most about this,
that that's
real and possible anywhere if it's happening
there. Now a resident, and this is on
the twelfth as well, a resident of Gene
Camp is refusing to leave his home
despite threats.
And this is where we are. So they're
going, you gotta get out of your house
because we're taking your territory. And he goes,
I'm not leaving,
and you'll probably never see him again.
That's where we are.
Same thing's happening in Gaza, and Trump's telling
you, well, we're gonna get them out of
the way.
Just because you yell freedom doesn't make it
any less of a crime.
Palestinian journalist, Raya Ork, reports on the extensive
destruction and flattening of buildings caused by Israeli
occupation forces in Janine, the West Bank, where
the Israeli invasion has continued for twenty three
days. Can you imagine not even hearing about
this?
This is the West Bank, guys. They're just
ex
they're executing people in the streets, destroying homes.
Probably not even shocking anymore, is it?
Makes me
sick. Now let's not forget why this is
happening.
You just can't under misunderstand this. So they've
made a deal, which they're now following through
with, that Trump allowed them to violate this
because they said that publicly. And part of
it was allowing what they've already agreed to,
which is the annexation of the West Bank,
which Miriam Adelson paid him handsomely for.
This is her ex.
Trump is desperate for Miriam Adelson's cash.
Her condition,
West Bank annexation,
which is a crime.
No way around it. But so too was
the embassy move, so too was the Golan
Heights.
These people are not what you think they
are. I'm speaking to Americans right now. If
you believe these people are somehow ushering in
some new golden era of freedom and democracy
or whatever you think is good, none of
that's happening.
I hope I'm wrong.
But if all you're banking on is a
bunch of words they say, well, you could
literally see them acting in authoritarian,
colonial,
imperialistic
action.
Giving people weapons to continue murdering children. Like,
how do we not see what's going on?
Please, please have the courage to call it
out.
Thank you for tuning in today, guys.
Tell you I can tell you right now
based on tomorrow, I've I'm I'm gonna try
to get to a show tomorrow, but I
it's tomorrow is my grandmother's funeral. So that
that'll be taken up most of the day.
But I kinda had the the feeling as
reason I say that is I kind of
I felt like
she'd want that in a way.
You know? But if if we have time,
which I I'm not sure. And the the
point is I'm gonna be there for my
mom the the, you know, the whole time.
For as long as the day takes, maybe
it'll be the whole day because it'll be
emotional. Right? But I have more to get
to.
I'm really trying to get back into some
routine.
It's I don't get I it's just crazy
how much has changed over the last year
for me.
Wild, actually.
And it just seems to be every little
thing that adds to me just takes time
away from everything.
But I'm really trying to struggle to get
back to some semblance of, like, a you
know, even, like, even before the times would
shift, but I felt like I was much
more consistent. And I'm trying to get back
there for you guys, but for my own
sanity as well.
But in general, guys,
there's just so much, there's so many different
ways of just in you know, I see
it's just every angle of coming to bring
down what we're doing, to stop what we're
growing.
And you know why? I think it's obvious.
So if you believe in what we're doing,
help us. Help us continue this project.
Right? You are part of this. You are
why this exists.
I believe in you.
I love you guys. Thank you for being
here. As always, question everything.
Come to your own
conclusions. Stay vigilant.