Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last twenty four hours.
Sunday, February ninth twenty twenty five. Thank you
for joining me today. Important follow-up.
I think one of the most important or
more one of the more important shows that
we've done on this platform was the last
one we did. Not just because of the
information, because I think what we've been doing
is
building the understanding,
myself included, around what we're dealing with. But
continue the kind of evolution of that conversation
really did culminate in a lot of important
things in the last show we just did,
which I simply just titled the technocratic coup
is underway.
Very nonpartisan perspective, and it's, of course, to
being rolled out as I see it under
Trump's administration. But if you're listening, it's not
unique to one side or the other. Now
today,
kinda following up on that same sentiment,
but really trying to nail something home today
that we're gonna focus on,
which is,
I mean, I guess, really what we have
been highlighting, but in in specific ways around
The USA
USAID, USAID conversation as well as Israel.
But the the how clear it seems to
me
that this is happening
right in front of us very in, like,
a bombastic fashion, like, very clear,
but they're using very well crafted kind of
partisan and not even unique to partisanship, just
these really very well crafted sort of division,
distractionary tactics, the way they've been clearly doing
well for a long time.
But I wanted to start with something important
before we just get right into it because
we're first starting with the point about the
funding of Israel, Seven Point Four More Billion
Dollars,
already a promise broken, or the idea of
what's going on in South Africa, which connects
with the larger point today for both reasons,
which is just interesting, which we've talked about
before. But the main point being actually about
USAID
and and just
how interesting it is
that the whether it's USA spending or many
other they're they're out there. It's public information.
Now that alone right there, we should wonder
whether I mean, how easy it would be
to just not have that be complete. That's
not even my point today. The fact is
there's gonna be I'm gonna show you things
from that site that prove what they're saying
is false. My point though is in a
larger sense, who knows if that's even the
full picture? It's amazing that we just take
these things at face value. I'm gonna read
something to start from Truthstream Media about that.
But
funding from the current administration through USAID,
right now, still happening.
Many different examples or examples of how things
are being thrown out via screenshot
that are important,
but yet omitting the dates, omitting the fact
that it's not something you know, something that
was continuing through his last administration, in some
cases continuing
now in the second administration. I mean, just
the reality of how you can show one
part of something and tell somebody it's the
entire picture. You know, living in a Plato's
cave dynamic. Like, you just don't realize that
there's more to it, and you go, wow.
That blows my mind. Re and not understanding
that all they're doing is selectively crafting a
part of that story to get you in
a very clear direction and lying to you
about even what's actually happening.
Again,
I kind of think everybody sees this. Now
I don't mean everybody in the obvious literal
sense. I just mean that most people seem
to recognize this. That's my opinion, but I
really do think that.
Just in they're just trapped in one way
or another and who we're gonna who they're
gonna vote for and who what the crowd
their partisan grouping says and or, you know,
like with COVID nineteen on the Democrat side
largely, but it went both ways, where we
now can look back and see. And even
with the continuation where they just were pressured,
bullied, lied to, it's important to understand that.
But I wanna start with a point today
that I do think is important in a
large sense. That I used to say all
the time in early part of the show,
I say every time before we leave,
but really just to think about what we're
doing here. You know? I'm gonna go through
and give you information that I think is
important. Everything is so,
and, I mean, more than I have ever
seen doing this. I speak to people that
have been doing this longer than me, and
it's it's objectively crazier right now in in
the sense of the way this game is
being played, which worries me about what's happening.
Same with COVID, the kind of law, the
rush through it felt it felt like they
were being clumsy for something that we didn't
see. Same thing right now. And I people
that have been doing this a long time,
they recognize, like, the the partisan thing.
It it's, like, for example, with USAID. Even
though it is an important conversation, it's fascinating
and terrifying at the same time to see
how these things
very clearly partisan driven. Not to say that
the story isn't in itself partisan, which it's
not, in fact, but that they the the
partisan dynamic chooses to latch onto something
left or right. Right now, clearly, the right
seems to be this machine that's being used,
and it just takes the air out of
the room. Yeah. I mean, and we not
in every single comp platform or corner, but
very clearly in most of the the what
people perceive as kind of the main conversation,
whether that's Twitter or wherever else. It's not
just one platform, but it's kind of a
certain mindset. And it really does just take
the air out of the room.
Everybody.
People that don't even care that much are
going, jeez, everyone's talking about this one thing.
Think how much is going on in the
world right now and why and how they
can fix it down to just one major
it's it's
it is terrifying to think about that kind
of control and the people that we can
see who are doing this, who, if you're
honest with yourself, are very, very dishonest and
in many cases, wildly childish about the things
that they want and what they'll accomplish. That's
you you probably think I'm talking to one
person. I'm really not. I'm talking about the
entire establishment, guys. It's wild.
But what we start with and end with
on every show
is to come to your conclusions about this.
Ask yourself what you think this means. My
point in saying all I just did is
that I'm laying out things that I think
are are evidence,
facts in most cases, things that I know
we can see.
And then I'll tell you, as always, what
I think it means.
But that's not what this should be about.
It should not be about you waiting to
see how I it should be what you
think. Now, yes, I can give you my
opinion, and sometimes I'll tell you I'm very,
very certain, but the point is that I
could be wrong as always. I could be
missing something. I could be deceived. Somebody could
be, you know, manipulating me. It's always possible.
It's not happening. I think you guys know
that, but nonetheless question everything. But the bottom
line is I'm gonna relay all the facts
out that I can see whether USAID
or the the African ears, I think it's
how they say that, or or with Israel.
And I want I'm hoping that you can
take the information
and and wait after the show. Read the
articles. Look through it for yourself. I know
and I know we're all
everybody,
is overworked and under with not enough time.
I think that's by design. But if you
really care, you will take the time to
dig through this stuff and come to your
conclusions about it, what you think this means.
And I'd love to hear what you have
to think, especially if you disagree.
Right? But in in an amicable way where
we're both trying to honestly seek the truth.
Right? That's that's a big difference than
attacking somebody. My point though is that I'm
hoping you can look at all the information
and remove the partisan side of this. Remove
the the feeling that we all have. All
of us, it seems, we're being driven to
to make, choose a side, just, you know,
pick one thing or the other, like with
the selection process.
That will mislead that will just lead you
in the wrong direction, and I think we
all know that.
So that being said, as always, with the
end, question everything, including myself, and come to
your own conclusions about what we look at.
Monumentally important. Now I wanna start with something
that true Truthstream Media,
just posted.
And this there's a few different things today
and some more that I could have added
that I'm gonna wait until the next show
that are it would made this much longer.
But just that everyone seems to be pointing
similarly thing similar things like this out.
If you have you don't know Truxty Media,
or Aaron and and and Melissa, they're doing
great work, and you should check them out.
There there are tech the, part of the,
independent media alliance, I guess, kind of to
dent tangentially.
They're they're involved in being a part of
it. They didn't want to necessarily be, like,
exclusively on the front of it. You know,
the point was they're they're engaged with this
process for this the entire time. And I'm
saying not only because you might not have
seen them on the panels and so on,
but they are people that are doing amazing
work. They're doing objective work. They're sourcing what
they do, and they care about the truth.
And it says the problem,
some people accept uncritically the reality with which
they've been presented
despite overwhelmingly
ev over overwhelming evidence that reality has been
scripted and programmed.
Now that's one of these general points that
we're seeing everywhere is that you're confronted with
just,
I mean,
unprecedented levels of evidence about things that we've
talked about forever,
and it doesn't seem to change,
hard to say, individually, but overall,
the direction of the conversation.
Some people accept uncritically the reality with which
they've been presented, through the media, through the
news, through your shows an ideologue from your
neighbor, despite overwhelming evidence that reality is scripted
and programmed. That doesn't always have to mean
in nefarious ways, but I think it's hard
not to see it that way. And I
personally do feel that is the case when
it's being dishonest.
But that they're choosing to script how they
present, what they're gonna say to you about
certain politics or what they're gonna wear that
day or how you know, studying long term
things that'll just be able to influence the
way you feel about it without you even
knowing it. You know? Or Trump and the
rest of them using, what is it, Cambridge
Analytica for their there's a reason we're in
this the the data scooping dynamic. As they're
telling you, they're doing that with things like
XAI and Twitter and the rest of them
for their artificial
machine learning direction they're spending billions of dollars
on. That's what this is about. You're being
used.
But it says, and the be and the
programmed
people running that code
have done unconscionable things to others in recent
years because of it.
She said, I get I get that some
people don't want to have to take personal
responsibility for their perceptual reality,
and so they prefer having it spooned
spoon fed to them.
But they should stop pretending
they know what's actually going on and stop
trying to force others to pretend they believe
it too.
Because the truth is, they don't really know
what's going on. They haven't been tried they
they haven't even tried to know. Why? Because
they don't actually want to. Now, aside from
her personal thought on the last part of
it, which I do agree with, it's it's
hard. I get it. It's it's it's overwhelming.
If you haven't really even
began to try to understand how and I'm
not even talking about partisan stuff. I'm just
being, like, just things that we all actually
agree on, but most people just don't wanna
really get into because it's uncomfortable.
But the point is that
you don't know what Trump thinks or what
Biden wants or what Kamala
you know, you don't know what these people
actually want and feel. You know what they
say
they want and feel. And if you can't
actually understand that that's a different thing, that's
that's incredible. And I do think there are
people that are kind of lost in this
world where what they say is what we're
supposed like like, almost as if you feel
angry at me for not having
the ability to trust somebody. It's like, well,
obviously, I trust a lot of people. I
just don't trust politicians, and I think that's
by design. I think that's how we should
be. A good politician will even tell you
that. Just like I'm starting the show by
telling you, don't trust me. Do your own
research. That is how this should be working.
But the truth is, you don't really know,
but we decide we do, and then you
force that down to people's throats. That's partisanship.
And it says, unfortunately, such an illusory reality
is incredibly fragile, and that's why anyone who
questions it makes those people who choose to
live in it so incredibly uncomfortable.
They don't care if they live in a
horror film so long as no one else
around them decides to go find out what
that creepy noise is coming from the basement.
Right? Willful ignorance. I mean, there's a true
level of
it's a it's a it's a philosophical debate.
Ask yourself whether somebody is truly happy or
if they're just don't understand or know. Ignorance
is bliss kinda dynamic. Personally, you know where
I side with that. But it says, well,
I prefer ugly truths over pretty lies. That's
what I agree to. And I do want
to know. There are many others out there
like me who see through the code, and
we don't want to be held captive in
a dystopian society by a bunch of programmed
people who obviously prefer the shadow puppets projected
on the walls of Plato's cave to the
sun.
Well said.
Just think about that.
Don't take that you know, think about we
we're in a whole multifaceted lane. It's not
just left and right. There's a lot of
different people in a lot of different positions.
Though it's always a healthy thing to ask
yourself, are we being misled?
Right? And if if you're capable of asking
that, well, then you're also capable of saying,
well, is it possible Trump's lying? Is it
possible he's wrong? Is it possible Palantir in
Israel are manipulating if he doesn't even know
it? Right? Is it possible that Biden is
still in control and they're all you know,
any number of fun things they could the
point is question everything.
And they're I think when you do that,
you tend to realize that they're all ultimately
in similar positions. Oh, you know what? I
forgot that I was gonna play this in
the beginning of and I I did, I
didn't play it.
Just because I'm gonna I'm gonna make a
point about Israel, which overlaps the funding, That's
why I was gonna include this. But, I
mean, I just I do think that this
is just absolutely unnerving to watch this man
sit there with Donald Trump. I'm sure you've
seen this. It it would have been relevant
if I played at the start, but now
I'm just kind of inserting it before we
get to Israel. But I've Netanyahu sitting here
smirking like a very, very I mean, Jackson
Hinkle calls him a demon.
You think what you want. I'm not the
the point is it's not for us to
say we know what is or isn't. The
bottom line is what he's doing is smiling
like the cat that caught the canary
while Trump is discussing explicitly about how Gaza
and Palestinians have suffered.
I mean, how do you even misunderstand that?
There's it's not like there's something else going
on. You watch him get more happy as
Trump continues to say the thing that we
all know he's responsible for and that we
all know is leading to them using that
for their benefit, and that's why he's happy
about it.
Wanna return.
The place has been hell.
It's been one of the meanest one of
the meanest, toughest places
on earth. Look at that smile. Right now,
it's it's I've seen every picture from every
angle
better than if I were there,
and nobody can live there. You can't live
there. So if we could build It's this
first one. It's right here. Just this this
evil,
you know, look at this guy. And this
he's literally talking about how these people are
suffering. Hell on Earth.
What what he must be thinking right there.
Yeah. You're damn right.
And I mean, god, it just kills me.
But
make sure you watch this. I'm almost I'm
almost jokingly gonna say, like, if you haven't
seen this, stop right now and go watch
this first. But this it's an important show,
and I really do hope that you watch
it. It's longer. I'd rather say the first
half of the show is most important. We
get into more other other stuff about USAID
and so on in the second half. It's
called the technocratic coup is underway. And, really,
it references a great article from Catherine Austin
Fitts in the Salahi Report.
Trump administration, digital control grid coming together at
high speed. And she does not mince words
in this, guys. She goes over the basic
reality of digital IDs. You know, of course,
you get the pushback from people going, well,
they said they weren't gonna do that.
Well, sure. Again, if we're gonna play the
game about the words versus what we can
see coming and what they've done and the
the outline, you know, ever from real ID
to I mean, the border, digital concept, every
single thing just because they you know, this
is how it usually goes. They'll do something
and they'll just give it a different name
with a different rationale, and those people who
are smart enough to know that's the same
thing will just shove it down your throat
because of what Truthstream Media just said. They
don't wanna see what the noise is. They
don't they're terrified to be wrong or they
don't want you know, whatever it is. It's
coming, guys. There's no way around it. Trump
and the rest of them have been explicit
about the need for these things in context
where most don't connect it with the idea
of a vaccine passport digital ID. But it's
there from a thousand different directions. How do
you think they're going to be able to
do the dynamic with the immigration deportation? How
do you think they're gonna do any number
of things they're laying out? How do you
think they're gonna rationalize this new AI infrastructure
when that becomes,
in their minds,
necessary for your life?
Are we really gonna pretend like they're just
not gonna be a guys, it's on the
surface. Or Stargate with mRNA injections for cancer
or whatever else they're rolling out or all
the things that are supposed to be if
Biden even flinched in that direction, you guys
would have lost your minds. And you rightly
so. You should be too now now as
well.
The, one of the main points she makes
about this with the Doge takeover of the
treasury, which is important to think about, and
it's just the overarching point we keep getting
into is that frustration about the idea that,
you know, if you if you care about
the things you pretend to care about, right,
the things that Elon Musk pretends to care
about, free speech, the constitution, liberty, and rights,
then you would be freaking out about this
even if you do think it's a at
the if he means well. Because what he's
doing challenges all of those things.
You you don't what he's doing is unconstitutional.
It's illegal, and I'm not saying I I
want all the government to go away. My
point is nonetheless that it's about a principled
point
that what he's doing there is not constitutional
or what he's doing with with the judge
right now that just basically came out. I'm
I'm I'm not I think older people are
corrupt in their own ways. But the judge
coming out and putting a pause on what
he's doing with the with US with with
everything, basically, with specifically USAID.
And or either I think well, either way,
the point was that I think there's multiple
things in play. The point is
that he after I think it was,
what, Insurrection Barbie made some point about how
this they should be impeached, and he goes
on his whole tear about impeaching the judge.
Maybe they're corrupt. But does that change the
fact that what he's doing is is objectively
illegal? Like, there's there they he is not
even an official person in that place.
He doesn't have an actual job in the
government. He is in a special appointee. Well,
I've gone over this in the last show.
That's not to say that there you get
to it's the point is the same. If
you are just happy about your side taking
control, then you don't actually care about the
things you're talking about. And what and the
main point she makes as you're cheering rah
rah for Musk to take over the evil
Democrats, well, guess what it does? It is
designed
which what she what he says is combined
with the purge of the civil service is
designed to end congressional control of fiscal flows.
And right there, you might go, yay. Okay.
But who is taking control? Where is it
consolidating to? Oh, a single military contractor Zionist
technocrat? That sounds good. And he goes and
and she says, and policies. This leaves, guess
what, the New York Fed and global central
bankers in complete control of the fiscal line.
Oops. I guess we just left that part
of the story when you were screaming on
Twitter about beating the Democrats. Right?
It's it's amazing how obvious it all is.
Social credit system has been going on well
before this administration, and it's gonna continue. Whether
we're talking about credit card dynamics or whatever
it becomes, this has been building
over multiple administrations.
Right? If we just have the wherewithal to
stand back and look beyond one moment of
a conversation, it's pretty clear they've all been
continuing the game. Cryptocurrency,
land grabs, of course, Gaza is the main
point in here. We talked about that's one
of the main parts from last show. It
appears Gaza is going to be some central
location for the new Technet, or at least
that's one of the possibilities, and Israel seems
to be leading that charge. And appears that
United States and Israel and Saudi Arabia might
even be spending and building that for what?
For you? I thought we were fighting technocracy.
I thought we were and they're literally calling
it the tech name. Guys, realize this is
the opposite of what we're and, also, everything
they said would never happen. Everything. From Gaza
people being displaced, from the ethnic cleansing, from
the taking the territory,
Never, never, never all about Hamas tunnels, and
now we're just doing everything we said we
wouldn't. And on top of that, doing it
with
every intersecting point that we've all been warned
about.
Gaza genocide continues and goes on about marketing.
She mentions weather warfare. And the bottom line,
this is a coup.
Important to understand. K? So thinking about that,
just one of the I mean, you could
go so many different directions about this.
One of the main promises was ending the
wars,
the ones he's mentioning is Ukraine and Gaza
on day one. He said that over and
over and over. Right? What'd he say? By
the time if they don't have it done,
by the time I get there, there will
be
oh, so what do you mean? Well, just
like we all were smart enough to point
out. I mean, anybody left and right that
were absolutely blinded by what you were hoping
he meant. You knew what he meant because
look at him look at everything else he's
done and look at what he's all what
he says, by the way, not in front
of a bunch of Republican people. He says
this in front of the bottom line, we
knew this would happen.
The continuation of the war because he is
I mean, look. My opinion, completely bought off
and controlled by an Israeli Zionist
entity.
Like, my point, I was gonna say it
like that, is because I you know, I'm
not gonna say that literally everybody in there
is controlling him, but I do think very
clearly there's a Zionist controlling faction that is
doing
far more than we can even see, which
is terrifying in this current administration, but also
Biden's, guys.
That's the game they keep playing. Biden was
not supporting
wasn't fighting the genocide. I can't even believe
we can still pretend that, but that's now
this kind of Republican game where he was
the one Zabora, you know, fighting against Netanyahu's,
what, genocide?
Well, I'd like to say yes somewhat, but
that's not what's even happening. But the state
department informs Congress of $7,400,000,000
arms sale to Israel. So clearly, that's not
ending the war. Clearly, that's continuing the funding
of of I mean, we could again, like
I said, there's so many directions. How much
is aid? What about aid? Didn't we all
just get told we were stopping all the
aid? Oh, I guess except for Egypt and
Israel, which is all about Israel, but also
Ukraine, which is also about Israel.
What about all the other things we're gonna
get to today? All the other USAID programs,
like funding the schools in California. Oh oh,
which is still happening, by the way. I'm
sure you're all gonna go, that's not true
because you just don't wanna believe it. You're
gonna stop watching now so you never have
to engage with it. But it's true, though.
Now, of course, you could argue that it's
some holdover Democrat, but I thought the agency
was disbanded. Didn't we all cheer because USAID
was gone, but Marco Rubio says he's taking
control? We'll get there. I just can't I
you know, what I just did right there
is just expressing my
immediate frustration with how stupid this conversation can
get with how much we can prove, but
$7,400,000,000.
What about North Carolina? What about Lahaina? What
about any number of things that we go,
oh, I guess they're second again because that's
America First. Right? No. I'm not saying there's
nothing happening there.
Right? I mean, I saw Vance show up
in East Palestine. I'm sure we're gonna pretend
like everything's changing, but it's not, though. NewsNation
just did a new report. They're they're suffering.
No one's nothing seems to be happening at
all. We get a lot of words.
Please show me. If you see something positive
happening, I'd love to see it. But here
is Reuters as well. This is from February
ago. Plans to send 7,400,000,000.0
to Israel.
Military sales, $7,400,000,000.
Now the bottom line overall of it is
that they're they're committing a genocide. Now I
know plenty wanna pretend that's not the case
because it's uncomfortable
politically, but it's true. And the world knows
that, guys. There's no way around it. That's
like pretending I mean, just pick the most
obvious thing you could possibly think of, and
it's like pretending that's not happening. We can
see it. And so they're not only continuing
to fund the genocide, he's continuing to fund
the occupation of Syria. He's continued to fund
the occupation and ongoing genocide in Lebanon. He's
continued to fund everything else that they're involved
in, which will shift into Iran. I can
promise you that, guys, unless we do something
about it.
And that is a lot
of weaponry. Now why does Israel need $7,400,000,000?
You know, that's on top of the third
3,800,000,000.0
they get every year from this country that
both bipartisan
both left and right continue to allow. And,
of course, even when they stop the aid,
they still allow Israel's aid to continue.
They don't need any of this, guys. We
are subsidizing this country to commit a genocide.
Your tax dollars.
You'd think Republicans more than anybody would care
about that.
Now this is from yesterday, and US state
department approves the arms deal for Israel.
Oh, this is going on. K? This is
and it shouldn't surprise you seeing as how
he just he just rammed through a billion
dollars for them out of nowhere.
Right at the same time, they claimed to
shave a billion dollars off of DEI programs.
What a coincidence. Pretty sure we're well past
any kind of moment where we thought we
were making or saving money in all this.
Yeah. You wanna go ahead and add a
like, they gave you this $2,000,000,000
claim, which, by the way, I still haven't
even been able to verify.
And then what?
We still we still pretending we're shaving things
off everywhere? Well, I know that's happening in
some
degree. I'll show you when I look at
the spending. But as far as I can
tell, we're spending a hell of a lot
more than they're pretending they're shaving off. I
hope I'm wrong. Doesn't seem to be the
case. Now as I said about this on
today,
not only is this not America First, obviously,
but it's also a very clear one eighty
on what Trump promised.
But watch
as those who were moments ago deriding, making
fun of you for suggesting this would happen
as they instantly now shift into deriding you
for not supporting what is necessary for our
security.
You know I'm right. And that's what's so
infuriating about this and the various and some
of the most influential people on the planet
will be the ones leading that charge.
Let's not forget, I just pointed this out.
This is Pam Bondi, you know, in the
same America First act
line. Right?
Immediately jumping to go after a task force
to prosecute October 7 crimes.
Because that's what America First looks like apparently
to the current administration.
Think that's pretty crazy, don't you?
Time packed flicks asked what I said earlier.
He says, taking over them, rebuilding God's is
a great idea, Maga says. And then he
he points out, but does Flint, Michigan have
clean water yet? On these old claims that
I guess we just forget about because it
never actually changed. Have all the folks in
North Carolina and LA been taken care of?
That's right. What about LA? What about Lahaina?
I mean, it's crazy how you can make
this whole movement about how they don't help
those people and then just make just we
won now. Those who cares? So it clearly,
for some, and I don't think it's the
majority. I think it's a team sport Republicans.
But for for them,
this is about using their plight for their
benefit.
Wouldn't they be flipping out right now? Why
wouldn't you immediately help Americans who we've been
made an entire movement around helping first?
Because they don't care about them. They were
using them to make you good people listening
believe they cared.
I think that's very clear. But he then
he his point is, what about Matt? What
about Flint? What about North Carolina? Maga goes,
shut up. Trump derangement syndrome, commie.
Exactly. The level of the intelligence, the conversation.
This is what's funny to me. This person
post a screenshot of of I get looks
like a, you know, AI ask on one
of these platforms
and says, yes. Flint, Michigan's water system has
met state and federal standards for lead and
copper for several years now.
Blah blah blah blah blah blah. Gosh. Darn
it, man. And I just did this.
It's like,
okay. You know who you know what else?
You know you know what was saying that?
What's the best way to frame that? You
would've gotten that same response
right before and right after. The bottom line
is, guys, the the standards our government has
are BS.
Do you so right now, Flint, Michigan needs
all the standards for water? What about all
the PFAS and dioxins and and glyphosate? And
what and what about the actual lead and
and all the different things that right now
you can still prove are rampant in half
of this country?
But that's why they lower the standards and
go, hey. Hey. Look at that. We met
the standards. Alright. How about the fluoride? Right?
I mean, how incredibly stupid. This screenshot of
all things. But even then, I mean, look.
Maybe he's right. Look at in look into
it for yourself. And guess what? If you're
take half a second, you'll very quickly find
out, no. It's not better. And Flint is
still suffering because guess what? It still has
the same broken water source that they shifted
to and has never really been corrected,
just like most of this country.
But I guess we're just not gonna care.
Right? Because
we're winning.
Well, in the conversation of Israel, because we're
talking about $7,400,000,000,
and this is the only part I'm gonna
get into about Israel because we're gonna we
we will follow-up. But sadly, what I keep
looking at just seems to be the continuation.
You know what? I hate I hate to
say it like this because it but it's
the truth. Part of the reasons why I
feel okay right now not focusing on how
horrible that is for the day, except for
this part, is because everything you're gonna hear
today is basically me going, I told you
so. See? That's what I said would hap
there it is. Oh, then we knew it.
It's every I mean, I'm not saying that
because I'm patting myself on the back. Look
for yourself.
From breaking the ceasefire conversation, which I'll show
you in a second, like, what's right here,
to I mean, everything. Literally, everything we keep
telling you continues to get worse and worse.
Now they're baking all these crate I think
I've got actually, I think I've got a
couple of them right here, but, yeah, leave
it at that. It's infuriating, but nonetheless, we
were already informed about almost all of it.
But we won't we will not relent on
this story, guys. This is one of the
most important stories, if not the most important
story on the planet.
Period.
Not based on national boundaries. It is incredibly
important because it is a genocide that is
not stopping, and the most powerful people and
governments in the world seem to be not
just okay with it, but funding it. And
yet that's still good. And we all see
it, and it still keeps happening. How is
that not, like, earth shatteringly important? You know
it is. But this, Sarah Wilkinson points out,
the Israelis
immediately raid the house of one of the
released Palestinian hostages
in an attempt to stop his family from
celebrating.
See how it works? So not only are
they
angry people or happy that they get their
family members back, who, by the way, were
never charged with a crime, many of which
were kept in detention for years
without charge in the only democracy in The
Middle East. Right? But also that they're rearresting
the people that they release. That happens every
single time.
I mean, it's just it's incredible, guys. It
happens
it's in the like, or even this time,
even worse, they were scooping up people in
the West Bank before they did this. They
did they this is every single time.
That's why we're not psychic when we call
these things out. We just know how they
operate.
More blatant ceasefire violations from Israel and getting
ignored, by the way, by all those currently
calling out South Africa
for a fraction of what Israel is still
doing in multiple countries simultaneously.
And I and make sure you hear this.
That's in no way to suggest that what's
happening in South Africa is unimportant.
It's not. It's just objectively
a fraction
of the ongoing ethnic cleansing, land grabs. I
mean, you name it. Everything they're gonna point
out in South Africa, Israel's been doing for
seventy years,
far worse right now, and just in Gaza,
but also Syria, also Lebanon. And so when
you get the Elon Musk of the world,
just like with the whole right after the
h one b point, he has lurched into
this conversation.
And he's been I mean, go look at
his count when you get a second. He's
been talking about South Africa and almost sharing
and resharing and recaptioning the same things all
day long.
Nonstop.
Why? Because there's an agenda being played out
here. Now USAID's gonna fade away. We're gonna
skip into this. It's gonna consume the conversation
because he's giving the marching orders.
Before we get to that,
Israel draft plan suggests airport, seaport as possible
departure points for Gazans.
This says Gaza government media office has said
over 1,200 12,000 bodies remain trapped under the
rubble, but Israel is preventing the the necessary
equipment to retrieve them.
See how that works?
Israel is preventing the aid and tools necessary
for Palestinians to rebuild and live their lives
while drafting plans to expel them. Right. So
we're being told over here that we're ceasefire,
right, in the agreement. So under the under
the not even the guys. Just as they
have basically tricked some people in the world
who are being blind and willfully ignorant, naive,
to think this is some kind of means
to an end, what they're doing is positioning
themselves to finally get rid of them just
like every other town we've ever talked about
this, whether in Yemen, with Saudi Arabia.
It's the same story, guys. This is what
they do. They're dishonest people. You wanna hear
they'll play the Wilkerson clip again? They lie.
They lie. It's what they do. The US
government is exactly the same way. So right
now, they're drafting plans to get them out
of the way because whether Trump and the
United States government take over the area, which
is certainly possible, but I get it. It
could be a floated game to make Netanyahu
expelling them feel better. But either way, they're
going to do this because the world seems
to be able to let them, which makes
me sick. Rather, the most powerful people while
the rest of the world is outraged that
it's even happening.
But not only that, but stopping them from
giving the tools to do anything to help
themselves in the meantime because they don't care
about these people, and they have no intention,
they never did, of letting them go back
to their lives. Don't forget, guys. Trump has
already made a deal. According to the Israeli
government, if you had any honest people in
your government or the media have already made
a deal to allow them to break this
deal when they see fit. I mean, they've
already broken it 45 times over, but they're
gonna officially make some case about Hamas
and then break it right basically right now
in the second phase dynamic.
And it was also agreed to they could
take the West Bank, which they already are.
No one's talking about it. That'll be the
main thing I get into in the next
focus.
West Bank is the new genocide, guys. They
are openly doing everything. I showed you earlier,
electricity, water. They're shutting it down. They're rounding
people up. They're dis they're destroying streets and
breaking down homes. It's been going on for
years, but now it's happening in Gaza fashion.
You have you even heard that outside of
independent media?
It's out it's outrageous.
How many more ways can they show you
it's a deliberate plan to destroy Palestinian life?
Here's Dan Cohen. I mean, this just makes
me sick. Right? So as as we've seen
I mean, even though let me grab this
so you can see this too. The IPC
has made it very clear that they're in
famine. One point this this was a while
ago. This was
I forget what the date is on here.
So by the end, this is jeez. Look
at this.
May 2024.
I believe that's the date on this.
March 2024. Okay.
Famine is imminent in 1,100,000
people half of Gaza.
Well, not half of Gaza anymore, actually, seeing
as how Trump and Netanyahu let that out
of the bag as they keep siding 1,700,000,
which means they know that they've killed hundreds
of thousands of people. That's not I mean,
that's not hard to recognize, guys. They know
what they're talking about.
But the point here
oh, is this the oh, this oh, it's
this one. Or where was it?
I think it's this page.
Anyway, this this maybe this is the wrong
one. This is the I mean, what the
right point, but there was another one that
had a detailed point about how many.
And it simply let me see if I
can grab this. There's another one pop up.
Maybe this
one. Oh, it's the same one. Alright. Well,
the bottom line point is whichever one I
had last time had the breakdown of which
ones were in oh, you know what it
was? It was this one.
Let
me get this one here.
Yeah.
Haven't looked at this in a minute either.
This is the OCHA from the United Nations
reported impact shot for Gaza as of February
4.
Right here. Ninety one percent of the analyzed
food population
or the analyzed population, 1.95, is projected to
face high levels of acute food insecurity.
Eight hundred and seventy six thousand people
facing emergency levels phase four of insecurity. That's
that's because that's famine. You're you are starving
to death. That's and and people are dying
day by day by day. We're just not
hearing reports.
Oh, and by the way, they're still not
letting aid in just like they have been.
The point with the famine
is they have been doing this. Remember, Ben
Gavir has and and Netanyahu have been
proudly saying that now. Not only admitting the
blocking aid, but openly saying how many times
they've sabotaged these deals.
Okay? So we know this right now. We
also know that they've been bombing and killing
their own people. Hannibal directive has been publicly
admitted now even by Gantz. Not to mention,
people had already said that for military. But
Gantz in an interview, which we'll get to
in the next show, has clearly stated that.
Yes. That was ordered. We already knew this.
Okay?
So Israel says, these are the people being
starved in Gaza and shows three of the
Israeli detainees that were released.
And, yes, they are
thinner than the other ones. But think of
how crazy it is as we've already heard
from every single other one, every single other
one that they were fed and taken care
of, while others are literally starving to death,
children included,
and that Hamas would cover their bodies when
they were IDF bombs trying to kill them.
That's not our opinion. That's from those these
detainees.
And Dan Cohen says, Israel, we must block
aid to starve Gaza.
That's Gantz. That's plenty of them. No food,
no water. Over and over and over. Also,
Israel, why did Hamas starve our people? So,
I mean, where else do you think the
food comes from? So if they were even
gonna have the opportunity to feed them, then
it would be the food that you were
restricting from going in. That's a no brainer.
But see, this is willful stupidity. If you
don't already recognize that, then you have chosen
a side and don't care about the facts.
That's incredible.
Include this for you so you can research
the the famine that's ongoing.
Not and they're denying that, acting like there
is no famine, which is disgusting.
Well, here is one of the actual
detainees or rather this in this case, hostage
seeing as how this is the person who
was put They call him an administrative detention.
That's why I said that. Not a charge.
Arrested
before being detained
when he was just released. And realize these
people are the ones that are being raided
and arrested again.
That is what it looks like, okay, when
they don't have an issue, when they're in
Israel. They got plenty of food. So what's
their excuse there?
I mean, it's far worse, but, of course,
the point is the same. You just don't
care if you're pretending this is okay and
the other one's not.
And it says and this person says, this
was my teacher
from my hometown,
one of my high school teachers. He was
arrested by Zionist occupation during the genocide and
was released today. So he's been there for
a year.
Israel wasn't subjected to a deliberate starvation blockade
like Gaza was, yet its hostages come back
looking far more emaciated than the the hostages,
which are detainees, guys. I don't know why
she would she she knows. They're these are
already have members they're releasing.
Palestinian hostages were starved deliberately out of cruelty,
but it's Israeli hostage we're told to focus
on.
Look at this, a neighbor Klompas,
sharing a picture from people in in, in
Nazi Germany,
nineteen forty five,
showing these three people
well clothed, you know, clothed in 2025,
who are being starved, by the way, because
they're not letting food in.
Now, look, there are statements being put out
and discussed about Hamas going like, look, the
way you've been treating us this whole time,
our patients can only go so far. Sure.
I'm willing to bet you anything, they're peep
they're now becoming more frustrated and more angry.
Now I'm not gonna say I rationalize that.
That that's then they then, like I always
say, that means they're just as bad as
the other. But you have to realize what
Israel's been doing this entire time that we
all can see, that everyone honest can see
happening. It's people have breaking points. Still not
okay, though. Right? If you're gonna make sure
you show the world that you're not like
the other side. Right? But in most cases,
that is what's happening.
I'm only even referencing, like, a conversation right
now. I think this is clearly indicative of
the fact that they were feeding these people
while everybody else was starving. And now we're
at a point where they're having far and
far
it's harder to get food. But she wants
you to compare this to the holocaust. Right?
While we can see people dying in the
streets, children starving to death,
and then actually committing a holocaust.
History repeats, yet the world fails to learn
and fails to live up to its promise
never again.
I mean, I just I really can't truly
express
how much I dis the
disgusted by these people. Because you have to
understand, guys, Aviva Klompas,
without question, knows what she's doing.
You don't think she sees that people are
start that she's not in some box. They
know what they're doing. You can watch them
try to take pictures and selectively edit, and
and they're trying to make you think that
this is the same and no one else
is calling it out, it it really does
unnerve me. It makes me sick. These are
the kind of people that deserve to be
held accountable.
Suppressed news, again, just highlighting the fact that
here they are smiling, getting let out, reporter
asking them how they treat you, and they
laugh and they say, we're good. Thank you.
How'd they treat you? Excellent. They were good.
Now, yeah, of course, they could be lying.
Maybe they're scared because they're right there. But
how about we recognize that every other time
to this moment, they continue to say that?
It's amazing how that part just gets dropped
off the story. They're probably being forced. Okay.
What about all the rest of them that
continue to say it? You're racist.
Yeah. You're smart.
Well, here she is again,
saying, here look. This is before he was
taken, four ninety one days. Look at what
they did to
him. Right.
Look look at how well not look at
how he's not dead because they were feeding
him, unlike you were doing to people, unlike
everybody and the, like, the fact that you
were making sure food didn't come through, that
you being the the Israeli government. No. Look.
Is it possible they deliberately didn't feed him?
Sure. But he's alive after a year. So
it's pretty obvious he was being fed. Right?
And and now you can compare them to
the ones that are being emaciated, and clearly,
you could argue they're being fed too. They're
not dead, but they are being deliberately tortured
and starved their entire time. And that's admitted
by people like Ben Gavir.
It's funny how you can try to call
me racist for making points that their own
people proudly point out. But I said, they,
being the Israeli government, who has now publicly
admitted to not just blocking aid, but also
repeatedly blocking ceasefire deals, causing everyone in Gaza
to starve, and yet all the detainees and
hostages say they are regularly fed? Then finally,
we agree. Zionism is racism. But, of course,
that's not what she meant.
Here's Craig Murray on the point of Lebanon,
which this is a super important point. And
I just wanna get some of these in
there for today, but recognize this is not
a small one point thing, guys. Israel is
expanding its borders. Israel is globalism,
is all of this. One part of it,
anyway.
If you are watching this multifaceted agenda with
The United States, with Britain, with they're they're
rolling out the new thing. That's what we're
all been talking about. And I just can't
right now, with the focus on Gaza, getting
rid of them, taking the gas and the
resources, and building their new Technetan location,
that terrifies me because of what we all
see building.
And the fact that people that have been
built careers around calling these things out are
suddenly pulling punches everywhere and can only stop
talk, the only thing they seem to talk
about is the deep state's running for fear,
Elon saving the world, Trump's great era on
the way.
Pretty sure we can go ahead and say
I told you so there too, seeing as
I've been talking about that for years. But
Craig Murray says, hi. It's Yerald Sham. You
know, the terrorist group that the people that
those guys are supporting also support, Trump and
the rest of them, Trump and Biden both
support the terrorist group that is currently running
Syria and Israel because they're there high fiving
them, building bases, and making sure that they're
in control.
You know, unlike what we were told by
all the lying partisan media and the government,
both sides of it. Hayat al Sham, at
this moment, as of the eighth,
is attacking Lebanon.
That that wasn't a that's not a typo
or mistake, guys. Hayat al Sham, the terrorist
group that The US and Israel allowed to
take control of Syria, is now attacking Lebanon,
pouring rockets and heavy machine gun fire into
the exact villages
that Craig Murray visited last weekend, glad he's
not there, because Israel is bombing them.
You still confused?
Those still in denial that Haikir al Sham
and The US Israel front are dishonest are
extremely stupid.
This is a coordinated front, and now you're
simply seeing the veneer that pulled away. The
mask is gone. They're funding terrorists to achieve
their goals and then using them in some
cases to justify
occupying territory.
They're funding them, just like Hamas, just like
anything else we talked about, guys. It's obvious.
Now you're watching the group that was a
terrorist group that you were told was terrorist
group by US and Israel.
They had a bounty on the person's head,
Jollani, who's now the president,
and you were told they wanna attack Jews.
They're trying to kill everybody. They hate your
freedom. Oh, but now we're friends. Now we're
working together.
You're literally built Israel's building bases in Syria,
has troops deployed in Syria, is now rolling
out new settlements, guys. But you're not gonna
hear that from the western media.
We're winning.
I'll include the show as Israel's global stamp
visions become clear, team sport republicans endorsed the
North American Union.
It's all happening rapidly, guys, and I know
how easy it is to pretend like we're
just making it up because we hate Trump.
But if you have half a second to
stand back and look at the bigger picture,
you'll very quickly find out that we don't
like any of them.
Probably the easiest way to recognize that we're
really just trying to call out the government.
But talking about South Africa, which, again, there's
why that's why this segment segue is so
important.
I mean, think about for a second having
the Trumps and the Elons and the Alex
Jones, all the rest of the world call
out
South Africa
clearly because they were just
primed to. All of a sudden, they all
start saying the same. Come on, guys. This
is not a new story. South Africa and
this over this goes back to Israel. It
goes back to the apartheid state that they
created working on ethnic weapons. I mean, this
is the same thing when they work with
Rwanda or in Bosnia. These people are typically
involved with the worst things in the world,
not about Jews or Israelis even in particular.
It's about Zionism.
The bottom line
is that you're talking about calling out South
Africa for racial ask for for murder, for
racial crimes, for ethnic cleansing, for land grabs.
Yeah. Now if you can't already recognize how
incredibly stupid that is while they're not calling
out a five, fifteen times, you know, whatever
you wanna call it, a larger example of
all of those things.
Everywhere you look, in multiple continent or multiple
countries.
You have to understand what's happening here, guys.
You that mean they don't care about South
Africa. They're either trying to redirect your anger
into an somewhere we can all pretend we're
all allowed to go after, but let's not
all let's not forget why.
South Africa was the one that brought the
Israel to the ICJ. South Africa is the
one I mean, they're they're causing problems for
this agenda. Now, yes, there's also very important
issues we're not gonna get into explicitly today,
but we've already talked about. Nobody should be
okay with racial action. Nobody should be okay
with people persecuting people because of their race,
because of their religion, obviously.
But my point is if you're gonna be
objective about that, then how are you gonna
ignore what's happening in Israel or any number
of other locations that the US government supports?
Because they don't care about any of it.
It says South Africa is confiscating land. That's
actually how he starts. Now this is it
is the post we showed you before, but
this is just his
whatever this account is.
1,500,000
followers. So it's it they just this is
that resharing from whatever he posts on true
social. South Africa is confiscating land.
I mean, right there, it just makes me
fall out of my chair. It's like, are
you kidding me?
Who else I mean, who else might be
self self confiscating land? I mean, who else
could possibly be doing that?
And treating certain classes of people very badly.
Yeah. Certain class of people. I don't know.
Like, Palestinians,
Arabs, or anybody else including
Ethiopian Jews who have the wrong color
or Orthodox Jews that don't like Zionism.
You know, that's Israel for you. And every
moment you could and it's I mean, it's
on the surface. Like, they're like
I mean, it's always been like that to
a degree, but my god, right now, it
is just, like, marching to the streets.
It says, it is a bad situation that
the radical left media doesn't want so much
as mentioned Don't so much as
mentioned. Well, maybe that's true. But you see,
this is the easy way to manipulate very,
very, very small minded people that can only
look through a partisan lens. Right? Because they
go, they're not talking about it. Oh, then
it must be the full picture.
Basic I mean, this is almost like one
step before reverse psychology. It's like this is
as simple as it gets. And and it
but it doesn't mean it's false, mind you,
but that's not evidence of anything.
It's a game to get you to lurch
into, oh, the Democrat versus Republican dynamic, and
that means we're gonna take this side because
the other side's worse. Even if that's not
really true, I know they're worse. So bless
their evils.
The United States won't stand for it.
A massive human rights violation is happening. Yeah.
You're right.
But if you cared about one, you care
about the other.
We will also we we will act, he
says. Oh, we act, That's interesting. Also, because
of this, we will be cutting off all
aid to South Africa.
Oh, well, wait a minute. Didn't you just
do that already?
Didn't you already just say you cut off
all the aid? Oh, I guess, but yeah.
But but you were lying, and we know
that now. But now you now we're cutting
off again. Okay. Got it.
This is funny to me how everyone's all,
USAID is gone. We did it. And it's
like, well, it's not, though. Rubio just said
they're still doing it, and they're still funding
things. And my point is now he's coming
out and going, we're cutting this off. And
a lot of them are, like, probably just
assuming he meant the the USAID ploy they
put out. But that's what's funny to me.
How much you the point is they're still
funding things. If he has to come out
and say
at on on the ninth that we are
now stopping that aid, how do think about
it for a second. Realize that means that
other USAID
aid is still happening. I'll get there. We'll
talk about it today. It is very clear.
I'll give you the receipts.
Greg Stoker says that's exactly what Israel's doing,
only worse.
When did when they did your administration,
Oh, so why then? Excuse me. Why then
did your administration just green light another $7,400,000,000?
America first. Am I right?
Honest people see through this, guys. Just don't
feel like you're cowed into thinking that everybody
sees this. That's a simple that's
hypocritical.
No way around it.
Here's Rubio.
Same game. I will not attend the g
twenty summit in Johannesburg.
Okay. So now because of a situation that's
happening that doesn't that's not necessarily the entire
country. Think about how crazy this is.
If let's just do let's just say this
was everything they want you to believe it
is, which is not necessarily that far out,
but they they are embellishing this in plenty
of ways like they always do.
You're gonna tell me you're not gonna go
to the g twenty summit because of this
because it's hosted where they are, but you'll
invite Netanyahu into your office. You'll invite people
I mean, of course, because they don't care
about any of it.
They're doing this to make a big statement
because what they wanna highlight is they want
you to then think that, see, Israel's not
the guy doing that. They're not committing genocide.
That's a big that's a Democrat lie or
whatever. Right? Okay. And then here's the real
example.
I'll get you all marshaled in. You get
all of your partisan sycophants. They're gonna lurch
into this without question because that's what they
do, and they make lots of money doing
it. And so they jump into it, and
they make big long threads on TikTok about
how everything
and they get they they track they trap
people. Then all of a sudden, you can't
get anything in any conversation without coming through
this. It takes the air out of the
room, and then people then start to think
this is the real story, and they miss
what's going on. I mean, even if it's
just distractionary,
it's
basic.
But to argue that you're going to make
this statement about South Africa
when they when in I mean, really, guys,
to be honest, there's bigger examples in many
places around the world. They just don't care
about those things.
I argue they don't care about this. South
Africa's doing very bad things, he says.
Expropriating private property. I just can't believe they
have the nerve to put that out. Using
g twenty to promote solidarity, equality, and sustainability.
In other words, DEI, climate change. Oh, is
that what it means now? You see how
lazy these people are? Yes. I agree. Those
things are very commonly used to shield and
hide other things.
There's gonna be a point about climate change,
by the way, coming up in a second
from the USAID dynamic that might surprise you.
But
solidarity, quality, and sustainability are good words, guys.
Those things mean positive things. They don't have
to mean positive things if they're being used
to manipulate you into some woke monstrosity.
But the game where it's now all bad,
they're they're almost driving you to ask for
bad things in the world. It's just it's
lunacy to me. And you think
Rubio is a monster. These guys are terrible
sociopaths, and they're getting you to be the
same.
My job is to advance Americans' national interest,
not waste taxpayer money to coddle anti Americanism.
Right. So how is it American national interest
to fund South Africa
or to resettle them in The United States?
Isn't that the opposite of what we were
just talking about? Didn't you guys just tell
us that immigration was a problem? Oh, I
guess it's only certain color immigration problems. I
get it.
Maj, Tajore, pointing out and this these are
the kind of things you're gonna see. I
mean, it is it's incessant, and it's always
stands out to me because, especially, these things
are being jammed into your feed even if
you don't follow these people because that's his
platform, and he makes that happen because free
speech. But it says openly calling for genocide
against white people.
This is he is Ian Miles Strong, you
know, the guy that seems to be constantly
wrong about a lot of things, and nobody
seems to care because they all high five
each other and keep sharing them. That's what
just keeps happening. Julius
Malema's anti white rhetoric is downplayed by the
likes of the New York Times and other
legacy publications in his own words. He says,
we will kill white women, kill Joe yeah.
I mean, listen to his statements.
He's clearly radicalized.
Right? Now it's important to understand. We'll get
into this more because, clearly, this is going
to become a forced conversation by the partisan
right. My point though is that clearly there's
more to talk about this. Right? Nobody should
be okay with
racial or or violence
like the comp like we're seeing played out
through racial violence from Zionism. But my point,
though, is that what we're seeing, you have
to understand that the history here. There's not
no not no way to just rationalize any
of this, but you have to understand what
people have been subjected to. It's it's the
same, like, point to make about why Palestinians
might act out in violence against Israelis. Nobody
should be okay with that. It's two wrongs
don't make a right. The same old statement.
Right? But you could understand
why it might drive someone there seeing as
how they've been raped and tortured and
and displaced
over and over and over and over, and
they have a lot of hatred. My point
is Israel
and and it's so funny to me that
somebody from South Africa, you know he knows
this, and I think this is where you
start to understand where some of his other
more extremist worldviews come from, would understand why
apartheid is bad unless he's not against it.
Seeing as how he supports Israel, I start
to feel like that's the case. But you
can decide for yourself. The point is he
came from South Africa. He understands the history
there. Israel
is
the way they had puppeteer strings on that
apartheid South Africa, and they were working on
horrible things,
guys. Things the kind of things you you
saw during the Nazi era. No surprise there
seeing as how we know the overlap today.
The point, though, is that that's where the
clear
drive came from. As you can see, if
you study Zionism the same way it does
pretty much anywhere else. Now that got pushed
away, rightly so. But now you saw an
overreaction to this day where you see people
that are being acting out against white people,
and nobody should be okay with that. Now
there's a much bigger point to the story.
But overall, for the point today,
for them to make this the biggest story
of the day,
Not only is that not America First, it's
clear he's just trying to get you
invested in what he wants you to what
they're turning into some left right paradigm conversation.
Right? Or it's what they're really trying to
make this about is some kind of larger
woke dynamic that's driving anti white racism all
around the world, which there's a level of
truth to a conversation there. But as I
keep talking about, remember,
if you understand these things, this is not
about
driving woke politics. Like, it actually makes me
almost laugh when people, how do you possibly
think that is what they're look at the
people behind these things. Take half a second
and don't just blindly follow a screenshot on
Elon Musk's Twitter,
but look into the people behind these things.
Look into the funding. Look at where it
comes from. Understand
these are means to an end. Whether it's
pronouns or trans or transgenderism,
they're driving you into a place to where
they can achieve the next step. And, literally,
as they're making you
scream about woke politics, they're building a technocratic
prison around you
In real time. With artificial intelligence, mRNA, and
everything else that you guys are the ones
that were screaming. You told the world that
was a problem, and now you're
looking at woke politics in Africa?
I mean, just take a second and realize
how transparent that is. And that's in no
way to say that's an unimportant story. But
especially, again, the point would be, if that
one matters to you, how in the world
is a genocide of hundreds of thousands of
people not worthy of your time?
Taj says, this has nothing to do with
America First.
Maj, excuse me. Maj de Jour. He says,
South Africa gotta handle their own business. This
has zero to do with an everyday American.
I mean, that's fair. Right?
I mean, personally, just from a human perspective,
I it matters. People are suffering. That's I
mean, to me anyway. But if you're gonna
like, this what's funny is the best way
to frame this is this is the opposite
of what they constantly push. Right? That these
things shouldn't matter if it's in a vein
of conversation they can't abuse for their own
benefit.
But now because it's in the interest of
Israel to distract you and clearly because of
their own political agenda, we're gonna make you
focus on something that has no interest for
Americans. And guess what? It gets more crazy
as I alluded to as Donald Trump now
wants them to be resettled in The United
States.
He says, I genuinely, from the bottom of
my heart, don't care to address that until
we've handled our own issues. But you see,
this is they're not America First, guys. They
don't care about these things. They care about
them in so far as they get you
to think they care, then they do what
they want, Just like every other politician left
to right. But here's Jack Posobiec, one of
the guys who would make I mean, I
don't see I'm not even sure how to
place the whether this guy's just an automaton.
He just basically seems to follow
hard line team sport Republican.
I mean, it it's just crazy. This would
be everything you would call out if you
had any principles.
So he goes and don't don't hear that
as I mean, I'm I'm I'm gonna lead
the way I what I might think. It
doesn't even matter what I think is correct
or not. What's important about this is that
this is something that they have just spent
years making a huge issue about, immigration. Right?
President Trump places sanctions on South Africa, not
Israel, though. That can keep happening, for their
treatment of Afra I think it's African ears,
if correct me if I'm wrong. I think
that's how that's pronounced, And promote their refugee
resettlement to The United States.
I'm like, that can't be true. And I
saw that I'm like, well, this is a
this has to be a joke. Right? I'm
like, that's incredible. Now what you'll quickly find
out is that these are Dutch white Africans,
South Africans.
So it's like
so, basically,
let me put it this way before I
read this.
If your issue is
the difference of culture, well, that very much
exists. Just because these people are white,
being the same skin color in no way
makes it the same ideology, the same culture.
You're talking about Dutch immigrants who came from,
in, like, the seventeen hundreds or '16 I
think it's late sixteen hundreds into Africa,
occupying, doing everything we know from their point.
The the bottom line is that they are
very different culturally,
not just because they come a long time
ago from the Dutch Denmark area, I believe,
but because they have lived in South Africa
for hundreds of years. They're not just assimilating
with The United States, guys. It's crazy. It's
and so the just the fact that that
now suddenly makes sense
when you guys would flip out about anything
that comes from a brown gun, that's racism,
guys. I don't know how you you need
to come to terms with that.
If this one is okay with you and
the others aren't, well, then you're a hypocrite.
All you're doing is put you're bringing in
a large group of people into The United
States to so you're now talking about the
same resources and the same assimilation, the same
point.
Why is this one suddenly okay? Why are
why are they not screaming at anybody honest,
by the way? And I am seeing them
are going, hold on.
Isn't that just immigration? Is that the same
point? Why and we're not talking about a
small group of people here, guys.
I just think that's insane. And it just
shows you the willingness of people to blindly
follow the party line even if it directly
contradicts what they thought they were doing thirty
seconds ago.
Addressing egregious actions of The Republic Of South
Africa. And by the way, this just lays
it out. I mean, he's very explicit about
this, both with what they're gonna do, but
also with why.
It says, in shocking disregard of citizens' rights,
Israel's been committing a gen oh, no. Excuse
me. That's not for today. I guess he
didn't see that one. The Republic of South
Africa recently enacted expropriation act 13 of 2024
to enable the government of South Africa to
seize ethnic minority Africaners
agricultural property without compensation.
Now it's worth digging into this, which I
plan to, to understand the dynamic here.
Is there something else going on? Are these
African ears doing something that is violating certain
you know, it matters, doesn't it? And I'm
willing to bet you anything that there's a
nuance to the story where you're gonna find
a part of the story where these people
are
violating their own laws, violating something, you know,
something that is driving this. And, of course,
then you'll find an overreaction of people that
just wanna go after white people the same
way that was done to them growing. Doesn't
make any of it okay.
But what's interesting to me though is that
you'll never get the full picture from a
partisan story. You just never do.
It
says this act follows countless government policies designed
to dismantle
equal opportunity employment,
education and business,
and hateful rhetoric and government actions fueling disproportionate
violence against racially disfavored lawmaker law landowners.
I mean, I don't I just don't wanna
keep making the same point, guys, but for
crying out loud.
I mean, if I didn't tell you this
was I actually, I should've done that. I
should've made that's a missed opportunity. One of
those classic points of, like, look at what
he just signed, an executive order about Israel.
Right? And then show them, like, a screenshot.
You wouldn't know any better. If I did
this right, you would be like, oh my
god. I can't believe he's calling on Israel.
And then be like, oh, wait. It's half
you know? That's
it's just incredible to me.
Countless policies designed to dismantle equal opportunity employment,
which is my opinion, that's always a that's
racism.
It should be merit based always, which is
what they are pretending they are, but they're
not. The Trump administration is doing the same
things in different ways. We've always shown you
that. It's left and right, guys. They're not
the different points. But
hateful rhetoric and government actions fueling disproportionate violence
against racially disfavored landers. That's Palestinians
to a t.
Like, if you can't even acknowledge that, then
that you you you don't then the point
is this none of this matters.
It's that we're winning and my side well,
my side thing is the thing today. I
support the current thing.
You're all the same.
In addition, South Africa has taken aggressive positions
toward The United States and its allies.
Oh, has it? Including
accusing Israel,
not Hamas,
of genocide in the ICJ. Oh, and there
you go. Not even buried. It's like the
first paragraph. Or and
reinvigorating
its relations with Iran.
Okay. So you're not allowed to have agreements
with Iran, which is a country that exists.
Right? I mean, who are the the fact
is they're arguing that you can't have your
own currency over there, and you can't make
deals with Iran. I'm not talking in a
way that violates something US has claimed, which
even then it wouldn't matter.
The simple idea that he's saying they can't
have a relation with Iran,
these are dictators,
authoritarians.
These are wild maniac people that are choosing
to insert their military
control over a foreign country because they don't
like what they're gonna do.
It's as simple as that.
Now, and the the main point clearly is
that there are well, they came after us
for the genocide that they're committing, that we
all know they're committing. The fact that they
still write these things down or that Trump
has the nerve to sit there with a
smiling moron Netanyahu and act like we don't
know that he's literally describing what Netanyahu did.
How do you not see that that shows
how they're they're either
a % on board with the agenda or
they are compromised?
I mean, you tell me what else it
could possibly be. That's incredible to
me. Anyone still pretending like we all don't
see what this is is a disgusting person.
So he's mad they did not accuse Hamas
of a genocide even though Israel's been committing
genocide for an entire year, and the ICJ
agreed, and the and the ICC agreed, and
everybody else agreed. But how dare you?
Sanctions against you for I mean
and what's it's actually a well crafted point
because, clearly, they are doing things. Some in
some cases, you can see that are worthy
of sanctions and and why I I'm I
take the sanctions point away. I don't think
anybody should be doing that from a foreign
country. My point is action.
South Africa or somebody the point is they're
doing things that are wrong.
So it's easy to bury these things. And
what are they doing? Hiding the bigger picture.
That's the that's the point of every story
today. It says it is the policy of
The United States that as long as South
Africa continues these unjust and immoral practices that
harm our nation. Oh, it does, does it?
How exactly does it harm our nation? That's
just clumsy.
That's Israel making this happen, in my opinion,
and they're just making it about your national
interest.
And the team sport politic blinds, like, fans
are gonna go, yep,
and force that down the throats of everybody
else beneath them.
Hey. The United States shall not provide aid
or assistance, South Africa. But, yeah, again, I
thought you didn't didn't you already do that?
But, no, that was a lie. The United
States shall promote and the resettlement
of African refugees
escaping government sponsored race based discrimination,
including racially discriminatory property confiscation.
Exactly what's happening in Israel, but it doesn't
matter there. All executive departments and agencies,
including the United States USAID,
shall, to the maximum extent allowed by law,
halt foreign aid or assistance delivered
or provided to South Africa.
So not completely though. You know, so the
USAID agency has been dismantled like he defeated
ISIS is totally still there and will be
giving some aid, but to the most extent
by law, we'll bring that back.
That a bit different than what we're being
told. Right?
Because most people don't even read these things.
And shall promptly exercise all available authorities and
discretion to halt such aid or assistance. And
then adds this, The head of each agency
may
permit the provision of of any such foreign
aid or assistance that in the direction
discretion of the relevant agency head is necessary
or appropriate.
Oh, okay. So if you want it, you
can do it.
That seems like a ridiculous thing to say.
So we're gonna stop it all because we
just agree. And then if they want to,
they can keep doing it. No metrics. Just
if they, you know, they re if they
feel it's okay or if they within their
discretion, if they think it's relevant, then they
can go ahead and do it.
So all that means to me is USAID
is not going to be at all, which
we already know. They're gonna use it to
fund the people they like.
If you can't see that by now, again,
you just don't want to. Refugee resettlement and
other humanitarian considerations.
The secretary
of state
and the secretary of homeland security shall take
appropriate steps, consistent with law,
to prioritize humanitarian relief,
including admission and resettlement through The United States
refugee admission program. So humanitarian relief
yeah. So, again, that's a third mention of
something that we're being pretending is stopping, but
it's not. I don't even think at all,
quite frankly, they're just reshuffling this stuff around.
I'm gonna show you.
But it says,
for African years in South Africa
who are victims of unjust racial discrimination,
such plans shall be submitted to the president
through the assistant to the president of Homeland
Security adviser.
That seems pretty clear to me. So I
guess we're okay with
mass immigration of an entire civilization or whatever
the you would call it
a group of people. It's not a small
group.
You're gonna move these people into The United
States, resettle them in this country, where I
guess we'll put them in Greenland and we'll
take that from them. Right? I guess this
is how this is all going.
If you pretend like this is not the
opposite of what you thought you were stopping.
I mean, guys, this is just immigration a
different way.
So I guess it is about what Israel
wants and what they don't.
Now
this is to the point we made in
the beginning.
Noctis says this,
everything feels so damn off, like everything. News,
events, history, time, media, politics, geopolitics, weather, day
to day life. Time seems to be passing
faster. Days melt into weeks and melt into
months, even years.
You don't know who is real, who to
trust, what is real, what to trust. It
all feels like a dream, a haze. It
all feels so off and strange. So much
history, good and bad, mostly bad, news, etcetera,
all happening so fast. Prices go up, quality
down, none of it feels organic.
It all feels so orchestrated and manufactured so
off. I don't know how to explain it,
but it doesn't even feel like we're alive
anymore. It feels like we are looking and
existing with a life filter, but it feels
so damn often strange.
You guys also feel
it. It's you know, maybe we don't describe
it the same way, but I think we
all know that there's there this is simply
different.
There's something weird in the way that the
ecosystem and you could argue just the technological
development of them doing the same thing they've
always done, manipulate and lie to you, but
now with a massive technological AI focused bio,
you know, all this stuff we're talking about.
But I think it's more than that too.
I think we are seeing a rapid push
for something that is happening. I I hope
now again, like I said in the beginning,
that's my opinion. Please come to your conclusions
about what I'm laying out for you. But
I I think what he's saying there, we're
all kinda feeling.
Now here's what Daniel McAdams said.
There are prominent, quote, anti deep state people
out there at the highest levels who are
sucking up massive amounts of media telling us
about state and USAID
and lots of other stuff.
You know who they are.
They are
on the biggest of all broadcast imaginable,
Perfectly packaged with shocking talking points, well dressed.
No one else is getting any oxygen in
the media
dominated by these Johnny come lately psy ops
or types. Excuse me.
Even those
who have been doing this for thirty years.
Look a bit more deeply into them. And
before you do before you do that, do
a bit of research on how intelligence organizations
operate.
The pushback against the war on the deep
state is not going to come with aesthetically
designed labels and branded t shirts.
They are masters of deception.
They want you to let down your guard
thinking the bad guys have been defeated, like
Alice Jones keeps screaming every day, when the
actual targets remain insulated from public scrutiny.
And the approved critics are massively amplified in
the same outlets that were not long ago,
cheering the very deep state they pretend to
now have exposed.
Trust no one.
Sort of like saying question everything. And I
simply said, Daniel sees it. I got the
pleasure of meeting him at the Bitcoin conference,
you know, and I just I I feel
like he sees it, guys. I think Daniel,
you know, like yeah. Even, like, I was
watching a break go a back and forth
of with Rand Paul talking about The USA
point. I think there's a very dishonest game
being played
as usual. Like, when they floated, they were
gonna bring Ron Ron Paul and Massey into
the administration, then just dropped it. They never
really meant to do it. It was all
hype through the the men through the team
sport
conversation.
Right now, you're seeing him kind of pretend,
I think, again, to bring Ron Paul in
to work to bring all this stuff down.
Because, look, Ron Paul is an I think
an optimist, and I think ultimately,
you know, he wants to believe. Like, I
think it's someone who's been doing what he's
been doing the whole as long as he
has, you know, you see these things start
to come down a little bit. I get
why you wanna be positive in that. But
if you listen to his long form conversation,
he's still skeptical in some ways, and I
think Daniel is very clearly. But the point
is they had the conversation about it, and
I think it's being used because of how
they're discussing this in a way that's just,
you know, their business is coming down. Like,
basically, you have people that are kind of
co opting what they're talking about and making
it about, look, he's agreeing. It's only the
left. That's not what they actually think.
What's and he but if you look at
his post, he's talking about all the media
worldwide. That is the truth.
But my interesting point though is that they're
pretending, like, they're gonna we're gonna work together,
and all it's gonna do is get people
more invested in what Elon is claiming is
happening with this because of the floated idea
that that I don't think it'll happen.
Honestly, because I think if they did bring
him in, Ron Paul would not buy their
BS. He would see through what they're doing
like that. That's what I believe.
But we'll see what happens. But this guy
says, it's not drain the swamp. It's consolidate
and rebrand the swamp. That's exactly what it
feels like. Like Garland Nixon said, it's like
a corporate reorganization.
Well, here is Daniel's quote statement again. And
Pollard says, Ben's Tucker interview that's,
what's his name?
Shoot. I just forgot.
Mike Benz.
The interview with Tucker was mostly Ben saying
a little bit of the deep state should
be preserved for soft power, AKA psy ops
or leverage on other nations,
effing pencils.
The point is, guys, if you're pretending like,
this is how the game goes. We're gonna
get rid of USAID. Yay. But then we're
not really.
But if they get pushed, we're like, we're
we're gutting it. We're going to keep what
we need. But if you listen to them,
they're not, though.
It's just a it's a game of it's
a shell game and how they reorganize this.
And and I'm gonna show you they're still
doing things, and that's going to continue. Even
if they do stop a lot of the
funding on things that I argue were only
a means to an end, right now, they're
still using it. If we actually want change,
it should not be keep the problem going
in our interest. That should be pretty obvious.
He goes crazy s h I t. I
like Trump's way better. Just talk to people
and make a deal. Screw all this subversion
stuff. So he still thinks that Trump's on
your side apparently, but, Daniel says limited hangout.
He gets it.
He says, Ben's is definitely a limited hangout.
Unless I've missed it, I've never heard the
guy mention Mossad once.
Spiro sees it as well, and he says,
the new world order has been rebranded itself,
and people have taken the bait.
An AI picture of Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones,
Elon Musk, and
Donald Trump eating watermelon,
laughing. It's one of those things like, and
then we told them that they we fought
the deep state together.
It's one of those kind of memes. Make
that one. Greg Reese says, I'm very curious
to see how they sell the carbon tax.
Well, I think we already know. Elon Musk
is all about it. He's said that many
times.
Alex Jones,
one point I wanted to highlight that I
thought's important in showing you the kind of
overlap of what we were just describing. We
just talked about this, that guy that got,
resigned
from the Doge team. Turns out he was
this 25 year old that, you know, shared
racist posts. Basically, it wasn't just the racist
post. He said that he wants the world
to be eugenics. He wants he he believes
in eugenics, he's paraphrasing,
which I think concerns me,
but not the same thing as what he
was doing. But the bottom line is the
guy resigned,
and it was because they were getting attention.
And all and then it came out that
they actually had all sort of actual writing
access and were changing code in this massive
database when they were told we were lied
to, and they said they did not.
So I think what's happening here is a
lot more alarming than what we're being led
to believe, and they like they're giving you
a surface level thing to argue about. That's
how all this seems to be working to
me. Right? So
I guess his handle was big bulls as
whatever the the pseudonym account he was using.
And the point is that that's what they're
talking about. They we wanna and they had
a a poll about bringing him back. The
guy resigned. What are we talking about? Why
why he chose to leave. Bring him back.
It's not like somebody fired this guy. At
least, that's the missing part of the story.
It says Trump sides with Musk and JD
Vance to bring big balls back into the
doge fold after he was doxed by USAID
funding journalist, Joe.
Guys, if you have not come along by
now to realize
like, I guess, I I get that people
feel that sometimes he says things that you
feel irrelevant,
but and that but will admit that, yeah,
he's, you know, fast and loose with things
here. He makes these things up over there.
How do you overlook something like that? Somebody
who was willfully deceiving you. Doc nobody was
doxxed. Are we still pretending that's what happened?
Wired published a story that made their names
public. The guy he the it's it's right
here. Let's see if it's still gone.
It was Ray in and out. Right? Yeah.
Right there. Ray inside out. Still gone.
They got this account posted.
Those names
or actually before this, so Wired posted a
story with their names. Then somebody on Twitter
posted those names and said it made a
comment, and and Elon literally said Ace is
a Doge.
Then this guy posted the same names,
and Elon said, you've committed a crime.
And they deleted him. Where's all the screening
about
free speech?
It wasn't doxxing, guys. He just you just
take whatever he gives you. Are you that
childish?
They're lying to you. And Alex happily told
that line, reiterating this. Talks by oh, and
now USA USAID
funded journalist,
which by the way was a completely abstract
tangent report. I'll show you what they're doing.
Now they're claiming, oh, what? USAID funded Hezbollah.
Why? Because a guy with Hezbollah in a
in a bio
said he didn't like what happened. But that's
we are the media now level of research,
by the way.
Here,
Elon Musk says, can't believe they doxed another
Doge team member. There's your there's your source
material, Elon said on Twitter. But they didn't,
though. And you know what? Alex knows that.
And he knows he's lying to you. Hon,
I'm convinced by that. Please make up your
own mind.
They're still gone. But free speech, save you're
saving free speech, we're told.
Here's what Alex says about USAID. Now this
is what's really frustrating for a lot of
us that have been calling this out for
a long time, which he knows and he's
mentioned before.
But now he comes at this, like and
this this is what he would what Daniel
McAdams was just pointing to. The Johnny come
lately. Well, he's not the best example for
a Johnny come lately, seeing as how he's
made points like this before. But the people
that step into this now and act like
this is being brought when this is public
knowledge for most people that are paying attention.
And now that that's becoming out, and a
lot of us are going, come on, god.
This is not new. Why are we breaking
this down like we're all like this? This
just got discovered by what Elon just did.
Well, you'd think he might come in and
go, well, guess what? We've been talking about
this for twenty years. But why isn't that
isn't that the usual Alex point? I did
I said it first. I was right. Weird
how now instead of doing that, it comes
into why USAID
gave $68,000,000
to the World Economic Forum.
I will tell you why, he says.
Get ready for you're gonna get schooled here.
USAID is a CIA front group funding the
manipulation of governments and populations around the world,
including regime change.
Bombshell. The dub the World Economic Forum specializes
in recruiting and grooming promising young leaders,
otherwise known as young global leaders,
who they then install inside government systems across
the planet.
You gotta love this flimsy effort to make
okay. Are we forgetting that Elon Musk is
one of those? That Donald Trump was one
of those? That Gabbard is one of those?
I guess we're just pretending. Because they all
love to make excuses for why, no, they
made they you're being you're being played.
It's embarrassing.
And so what's funny about this is, yes.
Yes. This was the case. But what if
you if you take a look at the
contracts, you'll notice that they took place through
Donald Trump's administration,
which, by the way, did continue. And that's
one of the points we're gonna make here.
But that's not what gets focused on. Right?
So it's somehow, it wasn't his he wasn't
aware it was happening while he was there,
but anything that happens anywhere under anybody else
is automatically their fault no matter what. I'm
of the
mind
that
anything that happens under a president should be
their responsibility.
If we're gonna apply it equally, that's the
way we should do this. But, obviously, USAID
is exactly what we've always been so how
many times you heard me say this? They've
even been quoted as saying,
we do today what the CIA did in
clandestine fashion twenty years ago.
How many times you brought that up? Now
they're breaking the story at all. Many people
like this, but the major point is that
they're only bringing this down because they are
changing. This is a reorganization, and he's playing
his part.
But also the
selective application of where these things are applied
to. Right now, the narrative is USAID is
a Democrat thing, so anything we point out
is because Democrats.
That's as simple as it's become, but it's
not the full picture. Before we get to
that,
let's not forget how these people who are
currently in this administration, the ones that Alex
Jones was just alluding to,
are people like Tulsi Gabbard.
Here's and, of course, this one gets people
all riled up. Here is Derrick Rose. Has
Tulsi Gabbard adequately addressed the World Economic Forum
Young Global Leaders question?
And you can look at it for yourself.
It's worth watching. The bottom line is she
says right here, I'm honored to be selected
as a 2,015
Young Global Voices representing Hawaii. And then goes
on to pretend like she they didn't I
didn't know. Okay. Well, then you were still
honored to accept it.
Bottom line is, yes. You were part of
this. And it says, congratulations, Dolce Gabbard, on
being selected. And she goes, thank you.
Oops.
Funny how these things get ignored when we
talk about this. But you re you can
go into it deeper for yourself and listen
to her response. It's important.
Or
Elon Musk,
who's listed, by the way, on Wikipedia,
the center of the World Economic Forum. And
it says the boss of this platform is
a WEF twenty thousand eight young global leader.
He's a conservative he is a conservative version,
and I frankly don't think he's conservative at
all, of Soros and part of the military
industrial complex.
Here it is on Wikipedia. And there's a
few of them in here. Oh, oh, okay.
It's still there.
Macron, as you guys know well, and I'll
play the clip where he says that.
Mark Rutte.
Right?
From
what is it? Denmark or,
Netherlands?
Mark Zuckerberg, who's now a good guy libertarian,
apparently, since he just decided to say that.
Peter Thiel.
What a what a surprise. Oh, where was
the, there it is. Elon Musk.
So these these are young global leaders. Are
you confused? Shouldn't be. It's amazing what people
can ignore when they don't wanna admit it
means something. Peter Thiel. So my point would
be the same. I'm not claiming this had
mean to everything in the world.
I understand the nuance to what this the
people can you know, it's not a guarantee
that that this means that. But it is
important, and the same play point applies. If
it's gonna matter for one of them, why
would it not matter for all of them?
Peter Thiel, cofounder of numerous companies including PayPal
or Sam Altman.
Literally two people with chi are involved into
the hilt in the current administration.
So if you think if Alex Jones is
gonna make this bombastic point, rightly so, by
the way, I argue it's a correct point,
of how these people are applied, and yet
then ignore how that
perfectly aligns with the current administration,
that's not an accident, guys.
So overall, we're watching these people work their
way in. Now I'm gonna end with this
point as well. Let's realize that World Economic
Forum is just one part of what I
see as this growing
technocratic, globalist, Zionist
takeover.
Now here's this clip you've seen before.
They want a return. A return. That's not
the one. I think it's this one.
Yeah. Right here.
And I have to say,
when I mention our names like missus Merkel,
even
Vladimir Putin, and so on, they all have
been young global leaders of the World Economic
Forum. Mhmm.
But,
what we are very proud of now
is young generation,
like, prime minister Trudeau,
President of,
Argentina, and so on,
said we penetrate the cabinets.
So yesterday, I was at a rec at
a reception for Prime Minister Trudeau,
and
I
would know that
half of this cabinet or even more half
of, half of this cabinet
are for our,
actually, young global leaders of the world economy.
And that's true in Argentina too. Wow. Yeah.
Yeah. That's Malay, by the way, in case
we're confused.
Alright. That's true in Argentina as well. It's
true in Argentina,
and, it's true in France now. I mean,
with the president, with the young global leader,
but
what is important for
I'll end with
the latter half of this that's basically listing
off all which shows shows their faces on
the page of Gabbard and Trump, and, you
know, it's it's important to understand that. I
believe Ivanka was one of those as well.
And by the way, somebody's mentioned the yay
point. I'll I'll probably get into that next
show. I think it's interesting to see how
he comes out and post this about how
he was bribed or tried to be bribed
to make some big statement. And then
a couple days later, he goes on some
rant about the same. I think that might
have been exactly what happened. Maybe maybe that
was part of it even, but we'll come
to that tomorrow on the World Economic Forum
post that that Donald Trump put out. I
think it's important to hear this before we
get into the rest of the show, which
probably isn't that much longer on just the
USAID funding.
Davos twenty twenty five. No. It's this is
the same point I did before. Today,
we all my myself included half the time
because it actually saves you a lot of
time.
A lot of times, we don't watch the
full versions of these shows or these clips
or, you know, we get we get the
kind of we go across platforms.
DAB and Twitter and whatever else. I mean,
look for the the clips that people brought
out that they think are important. Right? But
I I mean, I think we can all
acknowledge that if we only do that, we
are getting played. I think that's part of
the way or rather you can get played.
Social engineering, very real.
Using organic flow, but basically using it to
very selectively apply where you get outraged about
what you see. So I'm willing to bet
you most people don't even actually know the
full I'm not gonna read it entirely, but
what he said in this address.
What's funny too is that most of them
didn't even, course, ITE very carefully did not
use any symbolism in there that showed world
World Economic Forum. So when you're only watching
his video, you don't even know that's where
it's from. But this is when he was
speaking publicly at the World Economic Forum at
2025.
I think I mean, that that alone is
incredible.
I mean, look, I'm not just let me
be clear about this. I shouldn't even use
that example. I'm trying to think of something,
you know, something that everybody thinks is terrible.
Right? Like, I the point was it jumped
into my head, but the point is here
that I'm not calling these things the same
thing. But But you take something like, let's
say it was, you know, the Nazi party
and Donald Trump went and gave a speech,
but was only there to go,
you know,
kind of subtly against certain things that are
not in line with what they think, but
then saying certain things that were.
And then people at the border were like,
oh, he was calling out the Nazis. Okay.
Wouldn't it still be crazy to be like,
why did he speak there in the first
place? Why did he the game was in
the same point.
That he was there to call them out.
That was really Jones pushing that. And the
Malay said the pronouns are stupid. Yeah, guys,
but they both really were there to support
the dynamic. And it was about artificial intelligence,
it was about the I'll show you.
Which is what they all really care about.
So it's just funny to me that shouldn't
you be going, why is he even speaking
there? Why would Trump, after everything we've talked
about, go and speak at the
well, that work well, through through remote, but
same point.
And you know why nobody asked that question
or really the team sport doesn't? Because it's
uncomfortable.
Because it makes you feel like, man, if
this was anybody you wanna criticize, man, you'd
have an entire show about how proves that
they're part of whatever you wanna claim.
It's just crazy to me. So let's read
what he said.
Just a couple parts.
Of course, what he might what I wanna
highlight or I there's only, I think, two
main parts in this that I wanna highlight.
The point is, this is what gets fixated
on by the people that wanna like, as
the the shows I keep doing. Right? Under
a thin veneer of fighting left politics, they're
rolling out the deep state agenda. So he
steps up and he goes, these radical left
policies or says, I terminated the ridiculous wasteful
Green New Deal, one-sided Paris Climate Accord, added
the insane costly electric vehicle mandate, even though
Elon Musk is very clearly still working on
that, not through mandate, but same point. And
he goes, I declared national enter Oh, hold
on before I get to that.
The point is that these things right there
are what get focused on by the Jones
of the world. And you go, Oh, he's
sticking it to the World Economic Forum. And
then you don't hear the rest of it,
right? Because it makes you sound like he's
only there to troll the left.
But then he went on to say this.
I declared a national emergency, a national energy
emergency.
Oh, is that what we were told? I
thought it was because of the border.
I guess we
were played. And that's not and and that's
so important, he says. A national energy emergency
to unlock the liquid gold under our feet
and pave the way for rapid approvals of
new energy infrastructure.
Yeah. We'll go ahead and pretend he just
means oil.
Even though he he may,
but new energy infrastructure is not the way
you would describe that. You know what that
sounds like? Rebuilding, reimagining, great reset.
Just because he says the things you wanna
hear, bad green deal, energy, v electric vehicles.
How many times did you see where they
then end up coming out with a Trump
style version of the same things with a
different name, and everybody swear it's different, and
he'll do it the right way? Like artificial
intelligence, for crying out loud. If it was
Biden rolling out what Elon is, you guys
would be screaming about it. And we should
be screaming out either way is the point.
It's not it's not too silent. We all
should be screaming about it still.
But new energy infrastructure is exactly what I
and really, we'll show you now. He's talking
about not just energy, but the AI infrastructure,
which if you truly believe that people sitting
in that room are more interested in pronouns
and woke politics
than what he's doing, then I I mean,
whatever. I I I wanna think of something
stupid and then I have a bridge to
sell you. Like, you should like, that is
insane to me.
But he says down here, under the Trump
administration, there will be no better place on
Earth to create jobs, build factories, and grow
a company that's right here in the good
old USA. Yeah. Which I think most Americans
would cheer. Right? Rightly so, because we wanted
more jobs and more in industry. But is
that the old way we're thinking about it?
Or are we talking about this new technocratic
technological drive, which probably won't even amount to
jobs for you?
Then he mentioned SoftBank, which let's not forget,
is is real. I mean, that's very clear.
Look. Check out, Derek's
star, I have it here somewhere.
Stargate.
The article he wrote about all this. I
cover and on my show on it, by
the way, which maybe I didn't include,
which is ultimately
here is it. Here it is.
Where was I? I just lost my place.
Right here. Oh, yeah. So that ultimately Star
Bank or or SoftBank, excuse me. I just
should have grabbed the other one actually. I'll
include both.
Is and his role I mean, oh, that's
what it was. So in this show is
where I talk about that. Here's the person
standing there next to him. I mean, guys,
this this this is the bank that basically
funds the majority of their start up. You
and 80 unit eighty two hundred.
I mean, it's it's infiltration. It think of
it like the USAID of the technology. I
mean, that's maybe that may be very well
what's happening that just popped into my head.
Because realize
SoftBank is basically the funding arm, which is
also the funding arm of the Stargate project
of Israel for their
infiltration tactics using technology.
It's very clear. So what if we're simply
now in a new age where we're not
using the USAID net dynamic, we're using something
like that? You know, that's the way we
gotta think about it. It's technological.
And a lot of new directions is the
point.
But SoftBank has announced
between a hundred billion and 200,000,000,000 investment in
The US economy because of the election result.
And so Israel, clear. And just two days
ago, Oracle, SoftBank, and OpenAI announced a 500,000,000,000
investment in AI infrastructure.
Other companies, likewise, have announced no. Ask yourself,
why would these people be doing this? Is
that because they want The US to succeed?
I'd love to believe we lived in a
world where that was the case, guys, but
our history shows us that's almost never what's
going on. So it'd be pretty naive of
you to just want to believe that. I
do too. The truth is they're getting something
for it. So when we start to recognize
that you've got SoftBank, Israel dumping billions in
this country and you've got
Oracle, OpenAI, and all these different
technocratic, Zionist.
All these different groups we're talking about are
all in the same category.
What are they getting from this? What did
Miriam Adelson get for it? On top of
that, Saudi Arabia is playing a factor. So
we're being subsidized here. This is being bought
off, and it's not
what you think it is, guys. That's what
I believe. I hope you're willing to ask
those questions. Other companies, likewise, have announced billions
and billions and billions
adding up to trillions of investment in America
in The United States.
It is also reported today. And by the
way, that's his the way he speaks. It's
not fully fleshed out just yet. That's what
he says. Also reported today in the papers
that Saudi Arabia will be investing 600,000,000,000.
Still, to this point, it hasn't materialized just
yet. It has been spoken about and they
have confirmed it, but we haven't seen it
happen
yet.
I'll
show
you.
Saudi Arabia announces 600,000,000,000
in new US investment in trade. That was
February 9. But as of right now, it
seems that it is up in the air.
Like, so we said it. Right? But there's
nothing signed. Hasn't actually happened. So I'm willing
to bet you this is contingent on certain
things. Very a lot of different things going
on with Saudi Arabia. One of which they've
even said, they'll never work with Israel unless
they allow Palestinian state. I don't know if
they mean or not.
Kinda doubt it, but we'll see. Overall, I
think it's clear that Saudi Arabia is is
a construct of The US and Israel, largely
Israel, I think. I think it's clear through
its history. You can look for yourself.
But overall,
it's concerning to me.
Trill over a trillion dollars flying around,
and we don't even really know what's happening.
I I think I think other than the
bigger picture, it's hard to know. But we
can see that there are things that are
acting against American interest in rapid succession
with that much money flying around. I'm just
hoping people on the the side that want
to believe these people can stand back and
realize how alarming this seems. Even and just
just the possibility that we're right. Then this
part, I think, is interesting. So this overlaps.
And then this gets to the point about
whether we're talking about something different in Gaza
and whether Gaza will be a central location
for the new Technate,
which is what Catherine and a couple others
pointed out,
is that ultimately, we have Saudi Arabia
claiming about to
committing to eventually funding $600,000,000,000
in The United States. Okay. And then simultaneously,
apparently,
working with Trump and Netanyahu
to rebuild Gaza.
Okay. So maybe that's what we're talking about
here. You see what I'm saying? Like, they're
investing in this money on this one thing
over here, but then they're working where where
is all this going to go?
Do you know how you know how much
this money could help Americans? But guess that's
not where it's going. Rebuilding Gaza over here,
rebuilding like, there's something different happening, and I
think we're watching a massive fund that's gonna
be used to build the future of what
they're doing to you.
And here is what the Mohammed bin Salman
apparently is torn between Trump and and and
Saudi
and the Saudi people on on Israeli deal.
Now it says at the White House on
February 4, US, general Trump, told reporters the
US should take over Gaza,
then says, and redevelop the strip with the
help of Saudi Arabia. And Netanyahu said he
believed the peace deal could be the oil
rich kingdom in Israel is going to happen
soon.
You see what I'm saying? So I'm of
the mind that all the money flying around
in Israel, in The US, Saudi Arabia,
this is now we'll have to wait and
see. Obviously, where money gets applied, what actually
ends up happening. But with what we see
building with that overlap, I'm very concerned that
this is all coming together in it's just
like Catherine said, in
in in high speed.
It truly is.
Now Clayus more Clay, Clayton Morton Morris, excuse
me, who buys what I think just had,
or maybe is about to be, Derek on
talking about some of the work he did
for TLav. He simply goes, hey, Elon. Will
Doge investigate APAC to see if any US
taxpayer monies are funneled there?
Or is that one off limits?
Just curious.
Right? You're never gonna see that, guys, and
you know why. I hope I'm wrong. The
one thing I would love to be wrong
about.
But here's WikiLeaks.
Says USAID is nothing more than a slush
fund for the state department. Whistleblower
email circulated to Hillary Clinton, Jake Sullivan, Cheryl
Mills twenty ten. And there you go. The
point is we already made this is the
law this is why the Jones of the
world trying to repackage this in a way
as, like, a new thing with a different
angle. This has always been the case. So
when Rubio steps in and moves it to
the State Department,
it's all a game, guys. This is always
what it's generally been. It's been a regime
change engine for the Department of Defense. That's
what it is.
So when they give you this new mirror,
it's I don't think anything actually changed. I
think they're moving money around.
I hope I'm wrong, but clearly, I think
the evidence continues to pile up. And that's
what I said.
And it still is. Hashtag show game. Like,
that's the truth. Right? They just told you
the State Department's gonna be taking over. So
all they really did was change the way
it looks.
WikiLeaks continues to show you the information.
Thomas Massie adds an alarming point to this,
which he seems to see through this a
lot.
He says I'm concerned that the house and
the Senate, largely Republican controlled,
will fully fund USAID in March,
just like we did in December.
He voted no.
Now realize December,
and you can look back and see that
all the people railing into it now were
voting for it.
The argument from Republican leadership will be that
they need Democrat votes to pass the omnibus
bill or the for the government shutdown. And
therein lies the point as always, and how
many times I pointed that out. They make
sure that is always a thing because that's
always a way they can bundle this together
and make it look we have to. Well,
let it shut down.
You'll hear no problem from me.
The point though is that this ends up
being a way that they can rationalize why
they just had to do the thing that
we chore wouldn't do every single time.
And this person says, if they still manage
to fund it, which by the way, this
is what kills me. They are right now.
Right? It didn't go away. It's still happening.
If they still manage to fund it after
the exposure Doe has given us, which they
really didn't, then congress is in indeed beyond
repair. All they did was give you a
quick insight into one small aspect of what
we all have been talking about for a
long time. Only so you think Democrats or
Republicans and only since Biden's administration or only
Democrats. Excuse me. So it's just like the
Twitter files, guys. That's how they played you.
And I can see that on Overdrive today.
People taking screenshots at face value like no
big deal. Same thing. They didn't expose anything
other than USAID was giving money to groups
for illegitimate reasons. We always have been calling
that out.
It's both sides.
All of your government.
Thomas says, the current congress is beyond repair.
We need people that's mostly that's Republican controls,
guys. He says, we need people to start
paying more attention, to get more accurate information,
and to vote accordingly at the ballot box.
The question becomes,
can congress be repaired by voters in the
ballot box? Well, that was getting to the
right questions. I answered
no. Kelly McCarthy says the American people can't
be bothered to actually look up their congress
their congress representative's voting record.
Right? Action versus narrative. She says instead, they
believe what their representative
says.
Americans like being lied to. This is a
psychological game. You've been convinced through social media
and whatever else that what they just said
if or because it sounds nice or because
we should hope for the best, that that's
what matters most.
No, guys. Their actions matter. And historically, like
with Rubio, people go, let's just see. He
changed his mind. Let's see if he does
a better job. No. How about not? How
about we hold the state to the fire
because he's lied every time before this. And
then if he doesn't lie next, we'll be
it'll be a nice surprise.
It's amazing how people are being played right
now. Thomas seems to see it.
And then it's just like this.
So Mike Ben says, Hezbollah is livid at
USA shutdown,
which you could argue he's trying to be
funny, but that's how they keep playing this
game.
We were just trolling, but then you watch
how much this cascades out into the conversation,
and people like the Posobics and the Benny's,
they all do the same thing, and they
run with it. Me, Miles, Chong, and all
these people. They're it's just it's it's disgusting
how obvious it is. They don't even care,
it seems. I mean, you wouldn't if you're
making that much money, I guess, but I
would. Morals and integrity and principles matter more
to me than anything.
To me more.
But he go, this is Nicholas Noe. And
he says, this is the key interview with
Mike Benz. So he's calling out Mike Benz.
Right? That's why he made this point. Who
played a role at the chaotic, harmful, sudden
destruction of USAID by Trump. Now, of course,
you could argue disagree with that, but he
goes, it's hard to follow his arguments. They
rarely able to crystallize. I mean, I agree
to some level. I think Mike Benz is
shoving a narrative. And he has information that
sometimes is important, but it's usually partisan selective.
I think I see that with most of
them.
Anyhow, it's this, and it says, enter a
voice of Hezbollah.
So if you actually look into it, like
somebody would if they care about the facts,
it's basically a a a a a,
collection of, like, Nasrallah,
conversations and speeches and all sorts of stuff.
Okay?
Doesn't mean he works for Hezbollah or that
that's Hezbollah. I think that would be obvious
to somebody with a brain. Could mean that.
Could mean anything. He worked for CIA for
all we know. Could mean anything. Right? Doesn't
mean you know that because that's what you
want it to mean.
And it says here, he's the editor of
this what I just showed you, a book
that brings together Nostril speeches, interviews.
Okay. It's all right there for you. Right?
He says, the meme that America tax dollars
are funded by both sides of conflict was
real, Elon Musk. Now, again, if you actually
read it all, you could be like, they're
just kind of playing making fun of it.
The problem is when you read the chat
or or watch people that have written articles
about it, it cascade through the conversation. And
it becomes that now we know it's funding
Hezbollah, and that's why Hezbollah no. It's not.
Now that I can see, wouldn't and that
would matter to me. I would love to
report on that because that would be a
big deal.
The problem is that this is the kind
of we are the media now dynamic you're
getting. Where are they kidding? Is it kind
of a joke? Does it matter if it's
getting clicks and shares or suddenly becomes something
we wanna talk about? Or oh, no. No.
Like, right now, if for some reason this
conversation got all of it was starting to,
like, make change. Like, For some reason, people
started turning their opinions about Hezbollah, and all
of a sudden, they were suddenly Israel was
taking more territory. How much you wanna bet?
They just go with it anyway
because we've already seen that.
Or just they lie I mean, stories that
we know for a fact they did claim
were true, like the gossip condom story or
any number of fake stories, and they just
keep going.
That's why you should be questioning all of
this stuff. Now here's one. This is a
screenshot that came I I don't know if
it came from this article, but clearly the
one they're all using. It's just a screenshot.
So this is circulating. This is Lindsey, and
it says new name for legacy media just
dropped.
February 6. This post is from the sixth
as well. This one is from four days
ago.
And it says large scale social deception.
$9,100,000
to Reuters from the DOD for this.
Well, see, this is the problem.
Technically, it's not to Reuters. It's to the
Reuters Thomas. It's the LLC that is part
of the larger conglomerate that Reuters is underneath,
so it still matters. I'll go through all
the facts.
But if it's just a screenshot,
you don't get all the information. Right? You
don't know that this went all through Donald
Trump's last administration or that this is not
a new thing at all. In fact, this
has been ongoing for a long time and
apparently it ended in 2022. But see, all
that doesn't matter if it's just about getting
on the board of the you know, this
is the conversation right now. And you know
it's going to get a lot of traction.
This is hundred forty three thousand. Here's the
link. And by the way, I'm not necessarily
criticizing Lindsey.
I I do I do take issue with
the fact that this is a very flaw
like, it's just it doesn't it's not true.
Maybe she didn't know that, but I would
take issue with the fact that this was,
what's the best word for it? Didn't do
this was
I guess flimsy does work,
but loose. Right? It's not accurate, and it's
not it's not well fleshed out. And so
here is the actual well, first, let's read
this. US government caught funding large scale social
deception through Thomas Reuters Special Services.
That's what it's called. It's Thomas Reuters Special
Services LLC.
Now this is interesting to me. So Prada
is covering this, but
it caught why? Because of a screenshot?
Like, isn't that a strange thing? It's no
one's this is a public listed dynamic that
started in 02/2018 and apparently, which I'm not
gonna say we who knows? It could it's
probably I could almost guarantee it's going in
some other form, but end in 2022.
So how who's caught?
He this is the current media sphere.
One thing, a screenshot goes cascading through the
conversation
and everybody, which even seems to go back
to the Ian Miles Chong from the fifth,
surprise
surprise, color y surprise, it's this guy that
pushes this kind of thing out.
But it says leaked contract reveals
leaked
DHS backed program to manipulate public perception.
Pretty sure it's a public posted thing.
Why why do they have to make stuff
up? Well, I don't even know what this
platform necessarily is, provided, but think how interesting
this is. A newly uncovered federal contract
shows that Thomas Reuter Special Services was awarded
$9,000,000
for a secretive program.
I I mean, look, I get that it's
not how can you call it secret if
it's publicly posted?
Now you could argue that it wasn't seen,
wasn't advertised, but it's quite a bit different.
Right? But you'll see. Don't jump to conclusions
of what I'm gonna go with this because
there's a lot of interesting stuff. But it
says, labeled active social engineering defense,
large scale social
deception, LSD.
The contract issued by the Department of Homeland
Security suggests the US government is funding large
scale influence operations designed to shape public narratives.
Yeah. Oh my god.
Like every other moment in your entire life,
guys. That's exactly what they do every single
it's it's just kinda kinda funny that they
the sky is blue. This revelation follows previous
concerns about Thomas Reuter's deep ties to intelligence
and law enforcement agencies, like all of them.
TRSS is a subsidiary of the global news
and data company, specializes in high level analytics
and surveillance tools often used by government agencies
for counterterrorism and national security.
Another one would be Palantir.
That'll be there too.
I
found this is on, our,
Reddit.
Just people talking about it. And I saw
the
oh, here's well, this is the actual link
that they include,
which I have up in the next one
anyway.
Right there.
But they say this is Ian's Ian Ian
Miles Strong. So on the fifth oh, fifth,
can someone explain to me why the Department
of Defense provided $9,000,000
to Reuters
for active social engineering defense? And okay. So
he shares this because that was going around.
Or maybe he'd started it, but go this
is the kind of thing you see. Then,
okay. So he post this. It gets, 8,000,000
views. And from there, look at the look
at the quote tweets. Everyone's going, we knew
it. They're funding Reuters. But here's the two
the two things that matter. It was happening
during Trump's administration that no one wants to
talk about. So guess it doesn't matter anymore.
But second, it wasn't Reuters.
It it was a it was a part
of the larger company, but it wasn't their
news organization, which it still could trickle down,
of course. But that's why he follows up
and goes, it isn't Reuters, by the way.
Oh, because you were wrong? And that that's
not that's that's look at the time. 11:06,
eleven o one. Five minutes go by. Somebody
comments and goes, hey. That's wrong. Oh, so
I so he adds to it. That's my
opinion. But if you thought if you knew
it was, you wouldn't have put that up
at the top. The bottom line is these
kind of people will jump at anything that
gets that game going. And it goes on
to say, it's their special services, which was
which, by the way, it's not their special
service. This guy is a complete ass. I'm
telling you guys. It's just so crazy to
me.
I'll go into what it is. It's very
simple. It's, in fact, the larger entity. It's
not some special part of Reuters. It is
a larger part Reuters underneath that. But all
the game is to keep it going,
which was also awarded for Doppler, Mass Effect,
and a bunch of other weird stuff.
Okay. Well, if you wanted to look into
that stuff, you could. I'm not certain. I
understand what these words would mean, but neither
does he. And that's why he kept it
ambiguous because he's got the screenshots of the
pages. If you wanted to, we can include
the links for you, and you could do
your own research. But that's not how the
new media operates. You're supposed to trust them.
So
as this cascades through this with the screenshot,
this is from the Department of Defense, so
not even USAID, by the way. So that
that seems to be the the assumption right
now. If you're finding any of these, it's
all USAID because that's how this new media
game works.
But started in 02/2018.
Active social engineering defense, large scale social deception.
Okay. So when the very first thing you
do and by the way, so you can
see it, that's the same amount.
As well as the minus 62.
You could just see them both right there.
Hundred and 62,000, and there's the 9.147.
There it is. Okay. Same contract.
Well, look at
that. So in 02/2018,
right, smack dab in the middle of Donald
Trump's administration, he paid a million dollars
for active social engineering defense, large scale social
deception.
Are is he and Miles Chong and the
rest gonna call that out? Or are we
gonna pretend like it only matters now because
we're assuming that it applies one way?
How many how many people you think were
ever even gonna see this part of the
show? Maybe I should've done it for the
first five seconds.
Get it out there. I mean, it's incredible
to me that it's this simple to show
how dishonest all this is.
Or 2,019,
another million dollars. 2 thousand 19, another hundred
20,000.
2 thousand 20,
1 point 3 million. Again in 02/2020, '3
hundred '20 '2 thousand. Again in 2020, '4
hundred '80 '8 thousand. So are we gonna
ignore the COVID nineteen overlap in all this?
That maybe they were building up for some
social large scale deception program?
But no. Because Donald Trump's not the bad
guy. Even though he still promotes the shot,
even though he rolled out the program, even
though he started Operation Warp Speed, even though
he declared the emergency. Nah.
Now look, I'm not even saying that that's
exactly the I I believe they're all part
of it.
But if you can, you just can't consider
that.
That means you're being dishonest with yourself because
obviously that's a relevant thing to ask. Is
this the deception that we all went through?
Is this one part of it?
You'd think that would be a central part
of them sharing the screenshot.
Now, active social engineering defense,
this is one of the things they listed,
is it says, A S E D's program
is aimed at developing technology
to automatically identify, disrupt, and investigate
social engineering attacks.
Okay? So we got one side of it
is them defending themselves against that, and the
other is large scale social deception. Right? So
both. So it's both ways. We're gonna we're
gonna build so usually when somebody is a
a violent person, then they're on guard for
violent attacks. Right? If you're somebody that punches
people in the face, you're gonna be on
guard for somebody punching you in the face.
So you know you're doing this because you're
so you guard you wanna be on guard
against it. We gotta defend ourselves. Look. But
let's be clear. I'm convinced that all of
these governments are doing this in their own
way. The point is simply to recognize this
is done under Donald Trump's administration,
and it seems to have ended
in 2022.
At least it doesn't say revoke, but it
does the funding stopped after that. At least
on the record was my point from before.
So why would we brought up right now
as the new name for corporate media?
Well, I I don't need to connect every
dot for you. I'm pretty sure you can
realize what that means. Thomas Reuter special services.
Here's what the main page says. We are
building a safer, more secure world.
Oh, you know what? Did I just close
that? Hold on.
Maybe I could close the page.
Well, I thought I had the definition of
this. Anyway, it just simply it is
let me just do this.
Oh, here. It's right here actually
on this next page.
Oh, that's the markets.
I mean, I it doesn't I guess I
will just to be just because I made
a point about it. I wanna I wanna
read what it says exactly.
If it even pops up, let's see.
So it is a company that provides specialized
services for the US federal government, which is
what it sounds like, in areas such as
defense, national security, law enforcement. It offers creative
data driven solutions to help mitigate supply chain
risk, combat. You know, it's what you might
think. And all of these things in are
weaponized against you.
This is not
the Reuters news agency. That is one part
of this larger conglomerate. This is the larger
entity.
So just recognize how dishonest it would be
for Myles Strong to recognize it wasn't Reuters
and then still kinda pretend it was as
if this was under it. I mean, it
just gets wild to me.
So here's some other examples.
Now this this won't take very long. We're,
I'm not supposed to be under only about
two hours today. That's short for us.
02/2014
started.
Department of Treasury. Now, no. I'm gonna make
clear which ones are USAID, which ones are
not. That's important. This is just simply funding
to the point that they were making and
showing you how far back this goes. So
the point here is not necessarily USAID. It's
about the funding to the thing they're pointing
at as the new deception from today.
This one just listed as hedge fund, whatever
that means.
And
and and all to be clear for the
podcast, by the way, I should have said
last time, there's also funding from the from
any other, from before and after. Okay? So
you'll find funding in the year 02/2014.
But my point is, for the point we're
making now, and it's don't take it as
against Trump, it's just trying to highlight that
it's all of it. That's my point. It's
all sides of your government, and that's being
omitted today. 02/2018.
Smaller amounts,
$5,040,000
or maybe 30 some thousand plus.
But during his administration, funding the same entity
for hedge fund, whatever that means.
Now this one is for Thomas Reuters markets
as well from The US Agency Of Global
Media.
Also, same point. And this one for a
lot.
Looks like $2,020,000,000
dollars.
Most of it during Trump's administration.
And what's it for?
Whatever that stands for.
Down here, it says International Broadcasting
Operation. So why I find that important? Because
the main point that people are making about
a lot of this is they were funding
left media.
Okay? Well, this either means that Donald Trump
was funding left media, which is certainly possible
because they're all on the same side and
they're using it for one end, or he
was funding right wing media, which I also
think is possible because it's all the same
point.
But I bet this doesn't get talked about.
International
broadcasting operation.
Look at that. 02/2017,
over almost a million dollars. 18, same. Look
at that. One, two, three, four. Four different
times, almost a million dollars, just in thousand
eighteen. That's almost $4,000,000
in 02/2018 for look at what what these
ones say, the modification
is hereby executed to add funds. Yeah. It
doesn't even say what it is. But it
is a global broadcasting operation. That's propaganda, guys.
That's what this is. And you can see
this one wasn't there was zero. This one's
zero. But you can see 02/2019,
and I believe it continues.
Yep. And in 2020. Look at that. 02/2019,
over a million. 2 thousand 19, almost 500,000.
Another 500,000. Another million. 20 20. Another million.
20 20. 3 million. 3 point 3 million
more dollars right before he leaves office.
Adding funds to continue
news wire services.
Now, you could argue that means kind of
the same point they're making about
Politico.
Right? That we were just fine. We were
just paying for subscriptions or wire services for
our government.
But if we're gonna criticize one, we criticize
all. Right? We don't just broadly assume in
the interest of our agenda. Right?
US US Agency for Global Media. Now you
could argue too it's the funding for their
but it it's my point is broad. It's
propaganda.
It is funding through the same channels that
if we're gonna criticize, we criticize entirely.
Here, this one is from the Department of
Treasury. Same Thomas Reuters Markets. And this is
Reuters datasets.
That's interesting. Again, you could decide what you
think it means. It's not a lot of
information.
Financial datasets. I think it's about using these
to benefit whatever they're trying to accomplish. Could
be AI for all we know. But same
thing. 02/2019, '2 thousand '20,
lots of money.
$2,002,000,000.
This one's interesting.
This is due through Trump's administration,
and it's for Reuters subscriptions.
Now this one, I would argue, is Reuters
as the news agency, unless there's some other
subscription. So it's just possible, but that's just
my opinion.
Pension Bennett Benefit Guarantee Corporation.
And 02/2019,
almost a hundred thousand, 80 three thousand, two
hundred 20, 80 thousand.
So you're paying for Reuters subscriptions.
So if we're gonna be an open arms
about which I am, about the government funding
for government for for news subscriptions, which basically
is just in funding them,
then we should
care. All directions.
Now, Lizzie also points out Gavi, I thought
was really relevant to this. Bill Gates vaccine
organization, Gavi, was awarded
$4,884,000,000,000
from USAID.
Nearly $5,000,000,000
in taxpayer money to a single organization.
Two grants are still active.
The 4,000,000,000
grant ends in 2030.
No wonder Gates is speaking out against Doge
dismantling USAID.
But that's not what they're doing, though. See,
this is where it gets really interesting.
So explain this for me.
At this moment, it appears as if he's
not he is still getting everything he's getting.
USAID did not go away. As best I
can tell, it didn't even change other than
reorganizing certain things. But, like, my point would
be if you look at some of these
contracts, you'll find where once they took over,
they put it to zero or terminated. It
says terminated. Right? So there are things changing
in the context of programs they're funding, but
the infrastructure
is not changing at all, it seems.
They're just funding different things they wanna fund
and acting like they're demolishing it. That's what
people seem to think. So if they're not
disbanding it, then that means these contracts, which
appear to be still going, which I'll show
you, are
at least still there right now.
Of course, maybe he doesn't know about them.
But I think you already know where I'm
going with this, which is, well, big point
we got pushed back on, which seems to
be that it might be the way they're
still funding them. But if it doesn't change,
right, and Donald Trump just ignores this or
nobody makes a point about it and that
doesn't ever get deleted, that'll answer your question.
Because you know damn well that they know
this was there and you know that their
followers, especially with Lindsey pointing it out, are
going to call it out.
Let's take a look.
And this just simply points out the
more of the conversation.
Well, here is I have the the two
contracts she was referencing. Actually, no. I've got,
these ones were
the 4,000,000,000.
I think they're right here.
So here's the first one. This is, again,
in progress.
Seven months remain.
Make sure I didn't miss one. Did I
close that on accident?
There's $20.22.
Yeah. I think I actually closed one.
Shoot. I could find it real time actually
if we need to. Let me go through
this first ones. But that was the one
that was for
the $4,000,000,000 1.
Shoot. Okay. Hold on. Let me come back
to this.
So this one first,
GaBi Alliance
starts 2022,
ends 2025,
the thirtieth.
Right. So this is $3,000,000
or 300,000,000, excuse me. And that is as
of 2024.
So the point here is that if this
doesn't
if it continues into his administration and nobody
because you'll be able to see it right
here. I'll show you in a second. What'll
happen is I'll put this at the bottom.
What happens
is why is that not changing? Oh, there
you go. Is you'll have the last funding,
if you have organized like that at the
bottom. And what you'll what you'll see in
some of the other ones is you'll see
that this part will say terminated or zero.
Because they've now made the decision to keep,
you know, to basically say nothing. Now terminated
is different. I'm seeing zero, which makes you
think that that just means right now we're
not giving any money, but it didn't stop
the engagement. I'll show you that. But keep
this page.
If they do not change anything, then Gavi
is still getting the money, which is the
point that I was referencing before, which last
time, despite all the kind of flailing about
we got about this point, even though it's
very clearly provable,
vaccine bait and switch. As millions pull from
WHO, Trump gives billions to Gavi found to
Gates founded Gavi. That was his Trump that
his administration. And it's very clear. You can
read it for yourself. It's shocking that people
try to deny this. So today, we saw
something similar where we pull out of the
WHO.
Okay.
Well, how and if Gavi is the the
number one funder of WHO, and if they're
still funding Gavi, well, there's the same point.
So we'll have to wait and see, I
guess.
Let me do this real quick.
So put these in real quick, and we'll
see if we can't get that to pop
up.
I didn't put the date in, so it
might be an older one. Here, let me
just look for the price.
Grants.
Right
there. Yeah. There it is. I don't know
how I closed that. Okay. So we'll do
this one next since I just pulled it
up. So this is the one that ends
in 2030.
Same point. Kavy Alliance,
four billion dollars. That's insane.
K. So same point.
Zero and zero. So they stopped they they
gave them all that money, by the way,
in 2021.
So right now, though, the or but they're
still my point is they did zero in
2024,
but there's still the connection there.
So the but the grant connection so they
can cancel this. We'll have to see if
that happens. The other one has money that's
still coming, which there's more I'll show you
right now. By the way, though, that's in
case you can pause that and walk through
it. It's not that difficult to the site.
It just if there's a lot of nuance
to the the, you know, different date ranges
and keywords and numbers, and you can look
take time. Look through it. It's interesting. And
we've done this before
in
the
past.
K. So here's one more. Oh, wait. Did
I just shoot? I was mixing myself up
because I opened the new one.
It's all the same point.
I think these are the same. So
300,000,000
there. We'll see if that continues. So, overall,
I think the point's important that Gavi is
still making lots of money from the US
government that continues through Trump's administration. Now I'm
gonna show you some more in a sec
going through this as well.
So here
is USAID.
GaBi Alliance.
Ones we've shown you before. K? This is
what happened last time. This is the same
game they played. So USAID
and this is the this is the way
see, this is actually a perfect moment to
make this point.
This
article
is what the both Derek and Whitney
were were highlighting, and the point was they
got this ridiculous pushback from people that are
being very dishonest about it. And the bottom
line is they tried to say USAID already
had a contract before yes, guys. That's exactly
the point we're always making. Look. You can
see it. It had been continuing. The point
was the same thing we said, that not
only did he not stop it, which means
he knew that money was still going to
Gavi, which then went to WHO anyway, but
it went up. You can look for yourself
and see how much it drew look. That
increased by almost a million dollars.
That's crazy. Right? So that that's why when
you pull away only so many million and
then you add more, that's that's a shell
game.
Frustrating. Right? And you can also oh, this
is the wrong one. I think this one
goes
even into 2020.
Let me go check it. I guess I
didn't do that. I could just keep hitting
next, but let's see.
Twenty nineteen.
Number two.
Yep.
Another $290,000,000
in 2020.
Okay? So that mean look at how much
that is. In justice administration, add that up
to the one before.
So that means the Republican administration
in dramatically increased the amount they were given
to Gavi through Trump's administration through USAID. That's
what happened. That's exactly what Derek reported. There's
no air in that conversation. They're all just
trying to make lay shade over the so
now let's consider whether the same thing is
happening in a lot of different ways because
they're just screaming the Democrat bad narrative and
woke politics, getting you to think you're winning.
This one
ended in 2022.
K. Here's one also from USAID.
Project Hope, the people
the People to People Health Foundation.
It says new cooperative agreement for USAID community,
HIV and AIDS care and treatment activity.
Initial obligate, $4,000,000.
What you'll notice, guys, this was rampantly used
all through Trump's last administration.
You're gonna see multiple a few different points.
One showing you that like I did last
time, this is the last of if you're
gonna pretend they it's a corrupt organization, then
why was Donald Trump using it? And the
last show we did was about the regime
changes. He used it in Venezuela. He used
it in Syria. He used it in Bolivia.
He used it all over Nicaragua. He used
it all over the place. And we show
this to the dishonest Republicans on Twitter, and
they don't care. In this case, those are
already there. This is about funding for the
things that are you would argue, in some
cases, are woke politics or disease prevention, all
the things that we're highlighting.
So Donald Trump's administration from 02/1920,
all the way through,
you can look right there, $4,000,000,
2 almost 3,000,000, another 2,000,000, another million and
a half right there, another 2,000,000, another million
5. All that just in his administration to
fight HIV and AIDS. Now I'm not even
you could I'm not even overlapping this with
good or bad. I'm just simply trying to
point out that these are the things that
they would be screaming about right now as
Biden using this for his agenda.
Jumping to conclusions. How do you know what
it was used for? How do you know
if that was a type they wrote that
out, but it was something else? Maybe they're
actually helping these people. I'm not saying we
know any of it for sure. What I
do know is that they are dishonest, and
they do use these things for regime change.
In many cases, people could help along the
way, but it's no reason to allow it
to continue.
Shouldn't that matter that Donald Trump was yeah.
It really should if you're being honest about
it. So this one is from
USAID
twenty twenty. Domestic awardees, undisclosed. You're seeing one
of those float around today. But one of
them that I think even Miles Chong or
the rest are making it, look, look at
this undisclosed for burn.
K. Here's another one. There's a lot of
those, by the way. And it they go
through all administrations. So we don't know. Undisclosed,
domestic awardee,
$20,000,000.
Support public interest journalism
originating from local and national media houses and
independent journalists. We talked about this then too.
And these are the ones we went over
in the last show really quickly, or some
of the ones about funding. So that is
the funding of independent media. So that was
propaganda.
We talked they've had a whole push on
this and both administrations, by the way. And
as you can see, $2,025,000,000
dollars.
Same thing. Independent media national yeah. You're funding
propaganda. Now at the very least, guys, you're
funding
media.
So were all people cry what about that?
Is it only the certain left leaning things
you don't like, or were you willing to
call out $5,000,000,000
to fund journalism by the government?
Now here, you can see
2025.
Now that's before he took over. Right? So
that's the eight on the twentieth when he
took over. They brought it back down to
zero. That'd be Biden's administration.
I'm not saying that means one thing or
the other. Just interesting.
Recognize where they go from here. Keep keep
all the tabs on these things, guys. It's
important to watch and not just take the
narrative that Elon screens that day.
This one, early childhood development mass media activities
in Bangladesh.
Propaganda.
Twenty eighteen,
'2 hundred thousand. Two hundred '18, '4 hundred
thousand. Twenty '19, '6 hundred thousand. Twenty '19,
'1 hundred thousand.
Same point.
So propaganda in Bangladesh. All through Trump's administration
and, yes, through Biden's administration too. That's the
constant point here, guys.
This one,
placeholder
for OTI training, the digital media services procurement,
no funds obligated at this time, but 19,000,000
said. Digital media services training.
This is from all these are USAID,
all through Trump's last administration.
Nine 2019, '20 '19, '20 '20,
'2 point '5 million dollars,
and then through Biden's administration.
This one is strengthening media system activity. It's
all the same stuff, guys. They're propagandizing the
world.
All through Trump's administration. Strengthening media. This one
says modification of incremental funds to contract. That's
just more money.
5 mill 5 million dollars in 2019, '20
'20, another 1.5 in 2017,
and continues through Biden's administration.
This one,
the goal is to support AGYW
in health behavior change
by creating mutually reinforcing media products. So using
media to manipulate the way you view the
health dynamic. When was this happening?
Twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen, right before the COVID
nineteen overlap.
2,000,000 plus dollars.
Okay. Here's some different ones. Still USAID.
These, I find interesting for a different reason.
This one's this says University Research
LLC.
The purpose of this activity is to streamline
integrated health services to more efficiently increase the
survival and well-being of vulnerable populations and to
improve health system performance in select districts.
So health propaganda?
You can decide for yourself. I'm just just
trying to be funny there, but the bottom
line is I think most of it is.
But so this one's interesting. This ends right
before Trump gets into power.
01/16/2025.
Another 6,800,000.
But then after they're in power, which is
01/20/2025,
it's down to zero. They revised it to
zero, but it's not deleted.
That that maybe they're it'll be zero forever.
Not not every one of them say terminated,
but it's still interesting to consider. They now
you'll this gets these are just the starting
ones.
This one, same thing. This one is
USAID.
Technical assistance services necessary for the successful implementation
of the USAID
Tanzi Tanzania client centered health program, HIV and
tuberculosis.
Well, you saw him finding similar things in
his last administration.
This one,
right before 01/18/2025
for 09/2003, but hasn't been zeroed out.
Interesting.
Bill, it's building an important, you're gonna see.
So that one, maybe. Maybe that's just maybe
Biden ran it through right before, but he's
building new USAID
locations for this. And the funding seems to
be continuing.
Here?
Green Recovery Installment Platform Investment Platform. Green Recovery
Investment Platform, USAID. Dramatically and rapidly scaling up
actions to address climate change.
$1.17,
$36,000,000
still seems to be happening.
But that could change tomorrow.
We'll see.
My point though, it's pretty inconsistent, especially if
these continue. Now this this is where it
gets the most interesting to me. Those points
are just keep in mind for where this
goes. These ones
are showing you the reality that they're still
using this, which, again, this audience probably doesn't
need to be convinced of that because you're
not ridiculous. But nonetheless, I think it's important
to put out there. USAID.
USAID Enterprise Information Assurance and Associated
Services.
Literally,
USAID Services for AccuCenter Federal Services LLC in
Arlington, Virginia.
1 20 4
20 5.
1 Point 6 Million Dollars.
So that means after Rubio took over, after
The U the Trump administration took over,
one and remember remember how they they yanked
back on everything the moment they got there.
Right? Everything. So let's not pretend this is
some Democrat hangover or some this is the
Donald Trump administration
doubling more than doubling the amount they sent
last time
for the USAID program,
specifically,
enterprise interfin information assurance and associated services.
That's not even some the point is simply
USAID funding
continuing
through his administration, which you know by now
because you were already paying attention.
Right? This
this is what Rubio has already said about
this.
USAID doesn't like the first aid. Well, look,
I mean, my frustration with USAID goes back
to my time in congress. It's a completely
unresponsive agency. It's supposed to respond
policy directives of the state department, and it
refuses to do so. So
the functions of the USAID, there are a
lot of functions of USAID that are going
to continue. They're gonna be part of American
foreign policy, but it has to be aligned
with American foreign policy. I You get
it. So it's not going away. It's going
to continue.
Simple. We're just gonna do it the way
we like.
Sounds like we've all been talking about.
Here's another one.
This purpose the purpose of the contract is
to provide technical services under the woman and
men in agriculture activity,
the WAMA activity, for USAID Afghanistan missions as
described in the section of the contract. Now
if I put that to you as something
that Biden was doing, you'd all go, woah,
woah politics, and rightly so. Right? Because why
in the world are the American people footing
the bill for technical services for the women
and men in agriculture activity
for USAID in Afghanistan
mission?
You that we would all collectively go, yeah.
That sounds like something the Democrat right? Okay.
Then explain to me why on the twentieth
when they took over, they put $3,800,000
into that.
Anybody?
I guess we'll all just be quiet about
it because that's pretty embarrassing. Right?
No. It's just because this there it's probably
not even what it's about. It's probably some
cover narrative for that's how this works.
Maybe that is the narrative that works to
trick Afghanis the most into trusting this. Maybe
over here in this country, it's about using
some republican. Maybe it's a when we're here,
it's some pronouns. The point is it's a
vehicle
for the agenda, not the actual agenda.
That needs to be very clear. So in
this case, all we're seeing is more funding
for the USAID programs
under a guise of helping the women men
agriculture program in Afghanistan.
Well, we don't have pencils in schools or
people are struggling in North Carolina, but, yeah,
America First.
Okay. USAID,
another on a undisclosed domestic awardee
for $700,000.
Third country national personal service contractor,
malaria adviser,
USAID resident adviser. Okay. So the disease employment
like, so right now, no group in the
world more, or rather in the country more
than the Republicans, are willing to call out
anything related to disease and,
what do they call it?
Preparedness or, you know, whatever. That's what that
is.
And
they just put in $174,000
into that exact program.
That's huge money, but it's still going.
Still funding from the group that's supposed to
be gone.
USAID,
tuberculosis
diagnostic network strengthening activity. Same point.
Same point.
$3,000,000
on the twentieth.
This one I found interesting.
This is
the University of Southern California.
So it's a a school in California. And
it says project title, Statewide California Earthquake Center.
Complex network, you know, whatever whatever they fill
in the blank with. The point is funding
to a California school.
And, oh, and to be clear, Department of
Interior.
Look at that. Whale passed January 31.
Last week. $1,500,000.
A revision.
Great. So Donald Trump's administration is funding a
school in California? Uh-huh. No. You don't have
to make it about woke politics, but I
still find that interesting and and kinda funny,
especially since the old funding game is really
becoming cloudy.
This one's from HHS, Cal University of California
Irvine. Now these aren't necessarily meant to be
some big shots. I think it's I just
think it's interesting because it just shows kind
of a what I'm always trying to highlight
people highlight for people is that this is
not really partisan, guys. It's all a means
to an end.
Testing a memory based hypothesis for
an anhedonia.
Project summary anhedonia I think it's anhedonia.
Get this. The diminished capacity to experience pleasure
from normally pleasurable stimuli
is a transdiagnostic
symptom of multiple psychiatric disorders, including depression, schizophrenia,
post traumatic stress disorder.
Oh, good. So that sound like something Donald
Trump's HHS would fund?
Only only know if you pretend you're fighting
woke politics instead of whatever else they're actually
doing. So here we go. University of California
Irvine, some weird, what sounds like some kind
of woke program to me.
$1.23 $2,582,000
dollars.
This one,
same university this is the University of Southern
California, Department of Defense.
This one is about the mission basic research
proposal. USC Institute for Creative Technologies performs cutting
edge basic and applied research in artificial intelligence.
Well, that does make sense of where things
are going. Right?
$1.28,
$2,600,000.
And one more for that.
Design build demolition of
the Aronia
Diplomat Hotel site in Jerusalem, Israel.
That's interesting. So right now, people are struggling
in all sorts of ways, but they but
Donald Trump's administration just earmarked about $70,000
for some some new building in Israel.
I think that should matter. Right? I agree
with the people that are saying there should
be none. If we're if we have problems
that we're dealing with, why are we sending
aid to anybody?
Now
to finish,
what I think is really going on, I'm
sure you're well aware, I wanted to highlight
that funding also. But by the way,
also from USAID
right now.
That to me, guys, to end on this
point is I I think what's
you know, let me put it this way.
This is what you already know I think
is happening. So let me be clear on
that, that it could very well be that
I see that because I can't this is
where I'm seeing confirmation bias, if you will.
I do believe that's what the facts line
up to. But all I want you to
see
is that over here, you have a lie
being spread about how that's being allotted and
still going and so on, like everything else
they seem to be doing.
And over here, you have that very group
that they just said is no longer really
there to people that aren't paying attention that
is now ramping up funding for what you
already were told is actually gonna go on,
which is Palantir, artificial intelligence,
and everything else.
So in a way, all this is distracting
from what is actually happening.
So consider how you see that fitting together.
AT and T USAID.
USAID enterprise and network service domestic and non
domestic task order under enterprise infrastructure solutions, EIS.
So what I'm what I'm getting at is
that this is
USAID is not going away, obviously,
but they're just repurposing what it's meant for.
So right. But all this during Biden's administration,
the game was to get you so angry
about all that dumb stuff to tear it
down to rebuild it. So and and now
we're watching them rebuild it with the same
group.
So if they're if they're just repurposing this,
that makes sense because the direction is no
longer about pronouns. The direction is about using
what they built while pushing that in
and building it further. And this,
01/6000.
And then in February 3, just last week,
$1,700,000.
Here is one for Palantir Technologies.
And this is s a s s a
s a a s solutions.
That is $1.30 for
80 8, $853,000.
There's a lot of Palantir overlap here. I'll
show you.
So what's s a what SAAS?
It is software as a service.
I argue that funding is going to rapidly
increase the more that they grow this out.
A cloud computing service model where a provider
hosts and manages application software and makes it
available to clients over Internet on a pay
as you go basis. I don't know why
we're not terrified when they just took over
Treasury and took all that data or had
access to it. And you got a group
of Palantir literally telling us they're gonna use
your data to train their machines.
And guess what? There's even a contract for
that in here to use your data, your
health data, to train what they're doing.
There's so many overlaps of this that people
just don't even bring up in their it
doesn't even come in their mind.
So now you've got that group building a
cloud computing service where, you know, I think
we're being
you know, not just the shell game, but,
like, the like, the distraction dynamic. That we're
being shown something over here while the group
that's literally there acting like you're fighting something
is building this out in front of you
using your money.
Here's the Department of Energy, Palantir.
Safer
project execution task order, and it stands for
safety analytics,
forecasting, and evaluation reporting.
In a way, it kinda sounds like the
extension of what that other thing was. But
net but today. Right? The,
just mass scale deception kind of or whatever
it is. Analytics forecasting evaluation is a nicer
way of saying looking at all the data
and predicting what you're gonna do next,
which is what they do.
And that is $1.29 for $3,300,000.
Now don't forget oh, wait. Was this the
right this is in the right spot.
That was
at the end. We'll come back to that.
So SAFER, as it says,
is a strategic initiative by the National Nuclear
Security Administration
aimed at enhancing safety across the nuclear security
enterprise.
It uses innovative software tools to connect with
any database
and extract information in a simple and secure
web browser, helping to bridge gaps that arise
when using various system to address complex
tasks. Now it may not sound that alarming.
Maybe it's not. But keep that in mind
as we go into the next contracts.
This one, also Palantir, but from HHS, and
this is what gets most concerning to me.
Secure platforms support for the National Clinical Cohort
Collaborative
n three c data enclave
and NIDAP.
That is for $6,000,000
on the January 31.
So that's using your health data to train
out what they're doing. Now if we're talking
about the other data source dynamic, I mean,
I I feel like we're watching so if
you if you wanna stand back, and this
is completely hypothetical.
In mind, this is what I see possible.
Knowing of the seeing the Israeli Zionist
aggressive agenda that's and and with Alice Karp
and Thiel being right along with it,
with them using this to to infiltrating,
spying,
And then knowing that they're coming in along
with SoftBank and everybody else and basically building
this out and having other these other software
grants that are used to absorb data.
I mean, guys, I would just with Elon
Musk and Trump and how obviously Zionist influence
they are having their fingers in control, like
taking control, taking the treasury to the point
where they're pushing back from other parts of
the government.
I think we all kinda know what's happening
right now, and it's really terrifying to see
how clear this stuff is. Now, I mean,
simply in the idea of what Israel's doing,
but the Palantir overlap, knowing that they're working
with Israel to commit a genocide,
I think they're testing this stuff out.
And the data they're gaining from this is
going to be used against us for the
rest of our lives. N three c data
enclave support, the National Clinical Core Collaborative. A
data enclave is a secure platform that supports
the collection and analysis of real world data
from electronic health records to study COVID nineteen
and related conditions. That's what they're doing.
That's what Palantir got $6,000,000 to do.
The n three c data enclave.
So Palantir is now mapping out every part
of our health that they got from Oracle.
Right? That was Mount Seffslaue during COVID nineteen
Operation Warp Speed. No surprise that Oracle was
part of this whole dynamic with Stargate
and then bring it all together.
It just I feel like it's shockingly obvious.
I'll include that show we did about Trump
rolls out the AI biomedical control grid backed
by Israel and the deep state because that's
why I think what we're highlighting here.
Department of state
thunder it's it's it's Thundercat Technology LLC, which
is just an extension. And that's what you
have to recognize, guys.
There's a major shell game being played here
even for things like Palantir. So even even
though it says it here, there's times we
don't even get the actual name listed somewhere,
but it still goes to some of these
groups. Palantir platform term license and service for
a sixteen month period.
Now another overlapping point, now this is not
political or even news, but we have to
understand how aggressive what Palantir is really becoming.
It's terrifying.
But now you're paying for those services through
the government. And the and Palantir is using
its efforts to manipulate people's it's
this is not just about the media you
consume.
At you ask Catherine Austin Fitz, and she'll
tell you that people are at the level
of neuroscience at this point. And that's what
I think they're involved in. But either way,
the fifth, just a few days ago, $528,000.
And here's what's interesting, by the way. So
not only and this is I've been pointing
this out. What you'll notice on a lot
of these is the Biden administration. Funding
right up until the moment they stop,
and then the Trump administration
care grabbing the baton,
continuing the funding.
Now, yes, there are gonna be cases where
that might make sense even though they hate
each other, but my point is they don't.
And that's what it really shows. So think
about it. Palantir platform services
for the Department of State. Great. So hypothetically
speaking, if Palantir was some kind of backdoor
for something else, well, there you go. Too
late now.
Hey. Why Palantir stock surged to an all
time high on Thursday?
Gee, I can't tell why. Clearly, they basically
you know, you can see a very few
things you see a few things very clearly
that are in control here. Israel,
Palantir,
Technocracy, Zionism.
Right? You can see these things on the
surface of what they're all doing.
Funny how America First doesn't even seem to
be on the same page.
Now this is another one to include that
I thought was interesting.
Department of Interior,
Turknik government services,
information technology,
artificial intelligence,
machine learning, programmatic support services for the Department
of Defense.
Joint artificial this is the DOD
joint artificial intelligence. So let me we span
that in a second.
One twenty eight, twenty twenty five, four million
dollars. Now how many more of these that
I mean, I just I was just broadly
searching. How many more of these are out
there?
Now how this and by the way, this
is your tax dollars. So whether or not
the 600,000,000,000
that might come from Saudi Arabia is even
grace, that even ends up affecting your financial
situation, which I guarantee it won't or just
gets dumped into some larger global agenda.
This money comes out of your pocket.
Just think about that.
Let me see what this says entirely.
Yeah. So just they're
the Department of Defense chief information officer, the
DOD CIO joint artificial intelligence center. That's their
building.
Right? So it's not just improving your lives
and making your limbs work again. They're literally
building out a military artificial intelligence infrastructure.
Thanks, Trump.
I'm gonna go because that's the whole life
joking. It's like the operation warp speed.
You don't think they're all involved? It's just
ridiculous this point. With Biden and everything else,
I mean, guys, they're just handing this stuff
off to each other.
And Whitney has to say this about what
Twelve Ball wrote saying cofounder of Palantir around
here. By the way, a guy that just
something about this guy just he seems he
gives me the feeling of something like a
a car sale like a, oh, used car
salesman. But it says cofounder of Palantir and
major investor of Anduril, Joe Lonsdale from Palantir
explicitly admits
Doge, quote, cuts are being implemented by fellow
peep supporters of Teal and Palantir
to reduce competition for global autonomous murder drone
contracts.
And what he says in there is, I'm
a huge fan of Doge. You can listen
to it for yourself. I have lots of
friends involved in Doge, and I've been doing
my very best to help them. There's so
much waste in government. Yeah. We know that.
But all you're doing is using that waste
and not even really stopping it, just shifting
it and making it seem like we're changing
everything. There's so much to cut. Companies like
Palantir and Andre will actually do better when
you cut the waste. If you're forced to
use your money more efficiently and and to
say, we're going to have to do it
twice as efficiently, 10 times as efficiently, that's
when Palantir and Andre will win.
Yeah. It also helps when you control the
government. Maybe just a little bit. Whitney says,
when the people making the cuts don't have
to divest from the companies they run
or have a stake in or declare conflicts
of interest, a la Elon Musk, it is
more likely than not that they will use
that power to king make and benefit their
own companies, several of which in this case
of Doge are already government contractors.
That's our point that that's just it's just
me. The people that are cheering that on
either just can't see why that's alarming from
a nonpartisan perspective or just don't care because
they pretend that means they're winning.
But all it really means, if you just
pay attention, is that's gonna swing back around
and hurt Americans.
Probably the point though, if you really understand
the agenda.
Well, just lastly, Elon Musk now controls two
thirds of all
active satellites. That's September 6.
All active satellites. And we've talked about this
already. I just think that's so incredibly alarming.
Nobody should have this much power.
What I I mean, even if you think
he's the best guy in the world, what
if somebody then buys or takes over or
he dies? And There's a thousand reasons why
you just don't consolidate this power.
History is very aware of that. We, I
guess, have forgotten.
I showed you this one. New leak reveals
Musk cronies plot to revamp the federal government
using AI.
Remember this one?
The main point we made here.
And so it was, let's see.
It says just like a fun one that
you've been thinking about, what do you say?
Where was it? Log in, can't access. The
employees flag privacy act, which keeps agencies from
sharing workers' personal information without their consent. So
they're basically saying you can't do what you're
talking about using AI to map this out
and centralize what we need to find, which
is what he was saying.
And he responded by brushing the concerns aside,
saying, well, we'll try to get consent, but
that shouldn't stop us from moving forward with
the project.
You know, sort of rings true of, like,
due process first and we'll deal with or
take the guns first, due process later. You
know, we'll give them their fake constitutional engagement
once it comes around.
How do you ever pretend these people care
about your rights?
Just stop lying to yourself as Elon Musk
builds the largest satellite network of spy satellites
around the world that we ever seen. National
Reconnaissance Office wants you to know that now
you just can't hide because there are satellites
everywhere being looking at you. And this is
that video we showed you. This is just
from sat just this is February
for the podcast. Just rapidly from 02/2019
from almost nothing
to that. That's that's your Starlink, satellite control.
We're being taken over.
And don't forget, by the way, that this
is about regime change. Elon Musk, this is
Mint Press News, aiding the US empire regime
change operation in Iran. This is back from
2023.
He's secretly smuggling in Starlink satellite communications devices
into Iran. Why? Because he just wants them
to be able to have it. No. They're
trying to reach them with the propaganda. They're
trying to manipulate the situation for overthrowing Iran
for Israel.
And as Paulie St. George says, but Starlink
is for a fast Internet laughing at because
here he is saying space can offer the
ultimate weapons where you just have tungsten cannonballs
from orbit. That's what I mean by rods
from God or space based lasers.
Starlink system technically does have lasers, but they're
low powered for now.
Or why do we even believe that? The
bottom line is this is not what you
think it is, guys. Just like giving you
making this guy's arms work again
or a thousand other much more dystopian realities
that are already happening.
Pretending to give you Internet is an easy
way to trap my naive people into whatever's
coming. I swear I hope I'm wrong in
every possible way with every fiber of my
being, but I just can't get past how
obvious this is. And you can see how
this is a me like, we talked about
Starlink with Honduras. We talked about Starlink with
Ukraine. It's it's putting them in places that
you can see are budding parts of where
they're about to have an agenda take place.
How do we not see that?
All I ask is that you'd ask these
questions. Right? Stand back and go, could
could that be the case?
Because I think if you're really objective about
this, at the very least, it'll keep you
on guard. I hope I'm wrong. And if
we're wrong, we can celebrate together. But wait
to see. Wait to hold their feet to
the fire as you should more than anybody,
the people that you actually believe
in. Because you want them to be what
they should be. Right? Not just take half
of what they are because they lie you.
Make sure we are holding them to account.
Because what we're fighting for is clearly just
I don't know how you could pretend what
we're trying to highlight here is not as
partisan.
Just because it's one side of the moment,
both sides are doing it. And the reality
is we're fighting for American rights,
for your freedom,
for your choice to make your decision about
how you want your life to be. Oh
my god. We must be one side or
the other. I you know, I don't even
think most people buy that anymore. I think
we're at a very important inflection point right
now where we have an opportunity
to truly make something to to at the
very least,
get enough people to see it,
which is always the first step. I I
believe we're we might already be there, but
that needs to be something we strive for
because we're not gonna have anything change until
we can at least acknowledge that we see
it. And we're not gonna be dragged along
by the emails, songs of the world who
are absolutely profiting from the way they laugh
at how stupid you are for falling for
their lies.
And I'm not saying that to the broad
amount of the audience. I when I say
those things, I I should say more often,
I'm talking about the teams for Republicans. But
those people then
push the narratives which influence a lot of
the conversation.
And that right there is a problem because
ultimately, they're abusing the trust you have for
them because of the partisan connection. And that's
what we're always fighting to break away from.
Question everything.
So I'll leave you with that clip that
we we partially started with because let's not
forget. And again, the World Economic Forum is
just one part of this all.
But if we were on guard against it
during that, we need to see that it's
interconnected with the same thing happening right now.
It is globalism. It is Zionism. It is
technocracy. It's all rolling out in front of
you. If you ever saw anything as the
deep state or whatever we might think it
is, I've never seen a better representation of
what we've always thought it was. They're just
rebranding.
So thank you for tuning in today, guys.
I love you all. Thank you for your
support. Thank you for continuing to stand up
for this platform. We wouldn't exist without you.
As always,
question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Well, no, that
half of this cabinet or even more half
of, half of this cabinet
are for our actually young global leaders of
the world economy. That's
true in Argentina as well. It's true in
Argentina
and it's true in France. I may be
with the President
with
a young global leader but
And so who do we have as we
work, Klaus, in in, in the different meetings?
What type of, stakeholders do we have? Are
we The constituencies?
Stakeholders,
we have, if if I look at our
stakeholders,
we have business, of course,
as a very important audience, and we have
politics.
We have
continuous
partnerships with many governments around the world.
And, of course, we have NGOs.
We have trade unions.
We have all those different parts. Media, of
course. Media, of course.
Right? And very important,
experts and scientists and academia.
Because if we are looking at the future,
I think we should look at new solutions,
and the new solutions will be very much
driven by technological,
developments. And we even have, you even have
religious leaders. Right? Religious leaders. We have social
entrepreneurs, very important social entrepreneurs.
And
see
see difficulty which we have is to create
a consensus
in a very empowered world. And that's what
we stand for, for the process to integrate
people and to create such a consensus. Thank
you very much, Klaus. Congratulations.
Thank you.