At least in my opinion, I think where
the powers that be, however you wanna define
that,
are taking people is essentially leading us to
some sort of two tier society where there
is really no need for a middle class,
and it's really more accurate accurately described as,
like, a neo feudal,
style society
where you have a large underclass managed by
sort of this more elite group, that would
do the managing. And I think it really
falls under,
what some people have referred to as technocracy,
sort of this idea of more of, like,
a scientific,
dictatorship.
And there's actually this prominent,
figure from the Club of Rome named Dennis
Meadows, and the Club of Rome is, an
entity
that has a very intertwined with groups that
have become infamous
over the past several years, like the World
Economic Forum, for example.
But Dennis Meadows essentially said something to the
effect that, you you know, for the good
of people and the planet and the economy,
in in his words,
that it was gonna be necessary to either
reduce the world's population so that people could
have freedom and use resources the way they
want
or that, there would have to be a
scientific tater dictatorship,
imposed on 8,000,000,000 or 7,000,000,000 people in order
to to ensure,
accurate allocation of resources and all of this
stuff by
educated technocratic
scientifically.
These settlers have set their sights on a
new prize,
one that seemed utterly impossible before October 7.
Returning to Gaza, they cheer.
That is the goal of Zionist settler organization,
Nachalah,
one of more than a dozen groups now
advocating for the reestablishment
of Israeli settlements in Gaza.
A recent promotional video even boasts that Gaza
will become the next Riviera.
A recent promotional video even boasts that Gaza
will become the next Riviera.
The Riviera of The Middle East, This could
be something that could be so bad. This
could be so magnificent.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent
news as we see it from the last
twenty four hours.
Friday, February seventh twenty twenty five. Thank you
for joining me today.
Very important show.
Something we've been talking about for a while.
The general kind of abstract concept of whether
it's just technocracy
as Whitney well described there in the opening,
or
some kind
of shifting of power.
Now, obviously, it's very easy and very tempting
to want to see this through the lens
of the partisan two party illusion,
And you very very well may be right.
I personally think the facts are pointing in
every other direction.
I think right now what we're seeing, as
I've been trying to highlight, is the using
of kind of the destruction of that, kinda
like Whitney also was outlining,
to usher in the new control structure.
I have a very important article we're gonna
get to today that I really built a
lot of this around today.
That is Catherine Austin Fitts, Solari Report,
in regard to this being a technological coup.
Now I hold her opinion in very high
regard.
We don't I mean, there's plenty of things
that I have different opinion on like anybody
else out there, but I think that her
opinion is spot on. Like, what she's highlighting
goes point by point down exactly what's being
rolled out. And if you're not looking at
it through a partisan lens, I think it's
very obvious that this is everything we all
thought we were fighting,
and it's concerning as hell.
But what we're gonna show today in general
is the idea that this is happening, in
my opinion,
and I think the evidence backs that up,
and go over not just how it's happening
and what they're rolling out, but almost more
so around because we've been doing a lot
of work on just what that is. But
more so around how this is being you
know, how the pieces are being moved and
arranged in a way that hopefully,
at from their minds, stop you from seeing
it in order to get you jumping into
partisan conversations or feeling you're attacking certain parts
of the conversation,
making you think that maybe that's all it's
really about.
And I think it's important for this to
be laid out more we've been doing that.
But today, I think there's a lot of
you know, the way it's all put together,
I think, is very important. Now the reason
I started with the Gaza part too,
if we have time, we're gonna get into
a lot more about also what's going on,
some parts like the ceasefire, for example. But
the largest point I wanna make sure we
get to, and that will be done today
no matter what, if we if I don't
take too long, I'll try to get into
some more Gaza stuff as well,
is the point about the and that Catherine
makes very clear in her work
that what Gaza seems to be is is
there's a lot of moving parts, to be
clear.
What some of the prophetic Zionist per perception
is and what they're trying to accomplish or
you know, there's always different moving parts. But
I think at the top of it, as
she's highlighting, I agree, like we saw with
the gas,
aspect of the Gaza conversation,
the kind of technocratic building of the new
city as they're talking about, of course, only
for the Jewish elite that are being allowed
there by and that's not my statement, by
the way. That's coming from the settler
movement. But on top of that, the idea
that it's the technocratic bill, the island conversation,
ultimately, the point being that it turns out
in her work and her research that this
is central
to what is going to become the Technate.
And if you don't know what that means,
we've talked about this being the like,
the original actually, well, I'll bring it up
in a second, and I'll jump into it
as I'm talking in the opening. But the
the
North American Union discussion we had,
that picture that we've shared from the from
the seventies conversation going back to Elon's,
family tree,
the idea of that area was supposed to
be the Technet or at least the idea
in the back then in the
origin, at least as it was presented, in
regard to Technocracy.
So, really, what it means is sort of
like the the central location of the building
out of the Technocracy.
The as Catherine's calling it, the world control
grid.
And I don't know how we don't see
that.
Derek's work around the
the Elon Musk, Starlink
satellite network that the National Reconnaissance Office, you
know, the government, during Biden's administration, was working
on him with him to build a network
that could see everything. His His quote is
you can't hide.
And now in the Trump administration, it's still
going.
It's almost like they're not fighting at
all. And clearly, it's showing you this world
control structure.
Now if you maybe wanna convince yourself that
it's in the interest of fighting whatever thin
the veiled, you know, one point Democrat woke
politics direction, I don't see how you don't
think about the bigger picture of what all
that allows. Even if you think that is
what's happening and that's all that matters,
What happens when somebody else takes control?
It's just everything about this is falling apart.
And I'm of the mind as well that
most of people out there, not just watching
the show, but just left, right, all over
the map, are pretty damn uncomfortable with what's
happening. Whether it's the genocide that they can't
stop paying attention to or the idea that
literally every single point of what you, because
you're an honest person,
have believed you were fighting because they were
lying to you is taking place
or being done in some small variation. It's
still happening. It's all right there in front
of you. Now I hope to god that
I'm wrong about all of it. And I
ask myself every single day, am I missing
something?
Is it am I is it possible that
he is doing the thing they all want
him to be doing? And I look for
it. I try to see that because why
wouldn't we want that? Why wouldn't we all
want him to save us from all these
bad things that we all seem to, on
all sides, generally see as a bad thing?
Because what they're I what I argue the
reason that that
lens gets put over it that is because
that's how the partisanship sees it. It's not
about the outcome. It's not about the facts.
It's about us winning, and we project that
onto you. And that's what I think ultimately
it's stems from. I think most people
would like to believe whether Trump or Biden
or whoever else that if it was a
positive thing or would believe that that would
be good no matter who carries it out.
But you know as well as I, the
most people in the team sport politic arena
don't care
about the they they just want the other
side to lose, and that's what we're seeing
used more than anything. As long as it
makes the Democrats look stupid, we're gonna pretend
like we're winning
even though it's everything
we always thought we were fighting. So we're
gonna get into a lot today, but I
think the main point is about
the building of the techno technocratic world control
grid, and it's happening right in front of
us. Not just that we're saying it's here,
it's coming, and here here are the but
that it's happening.
That's the important thing to take away from
it. This not just that we're talking about
the where it could go, that they're building
this and have
been. Partly in Biden's administration, now the real
execution is happening through Trump. And it's not
that it's left or right or Trump and
Biden. It's just the fact that it's the
government and the different varying political paradigm dynamics
keeping you from looking at what's being built
around you. We've been calling this out for
a long time, and, again, I hope that
we're wrong.
So let's start with, of course, the highlighting
of that
breakdown that, Decenters News made. Great overlap because
people are forgetting these words. I mean, it's
not just a coincidence that Trump happens to
just go, well, it's like the new Riviera.
And if you don't remember what he's talking
about, it's that he just said, and we'll
get to it if we have time, again,
they're gonna just occupy Gaza.
Again, by the way, or rather on top
of the current occupation,
which we'll get to. I mean, if we
don't get today, it will be in the
next show. The the the absurdity around that.
What that really means. And there's no way
you stretch that into what we all thought
was that's that's the opposite. Remember when we
were always gonna end it all? Or even
some of them going, what's actually gonna be
Israel he takes down? I don't see any
of that even barely coming to pass.
Hope so.
But hope is one thing. Facts and evidence
are quite another. I will always hope for
the positive outcome, but I won't ignore the
facts in lieu of my hope that he's
telling the truth. Usually, they aren't. So at
the end of the day, we're talking about
him turning Gaza into something else.
Now could that be just what Israel wants
because he's clearly this bought off stooge for
Israel? Certainly my opinion, but damn it if
the evidence isn't there.
Or is it for something bigger?
Is it a bigger story about something that
they're all working on for, I don't know,
some technocratic
Zionist globalist movement that all the people that
have always said we're fighting that are suddenly
looking in every other direction and can't stop
screaming how we're fighting and beating the deep
state? Can't you see it? Can't you see
how the deep state is running scared as
they literally have this dream played out of
everything they've always wanted? They're scared, we're being
told.
My god. I don't know how people listen
to these things. Anyway,
we'll get to it all.
Great clip from Decentral News as usual. Now
one thing I wanted to throw out there
early because I just saw it for it
live that I thought was wild. I'm sure
I could've fitted in better in the show
today, but just saw it for it live.
Breaking news from every corporate platform. President Trump
says he's revoking former boat president Joe Biden's
security clearance. Now it's things like this that
really kinda throw me sometimes where I'm going,
woah. Like, that's okay. I I hope you
take a second to reflect on if it
actually happens, which is a big that's a
there's that makes a big difference, obviously.
That's a big deal
because of shifts in normalcy.
On top of the fact that I've always
pointed out the idea that usually they play
the game with themselves. Right? Like, well, may
maybe this is all in the interest of
making sure you don't think they're on the
same side because this won't matter anymore once
they build this last part. I hope I'm
wrong. But what's interesting is usually, it's like
we don't go after each other because, you
know, even if they're not friends or even
on the same side, there's a general, you
know,
honor among thieves, if you will. And so
you don't do that because then the next
time he come now when he leaves, the
Democrats are gonna do it to him. And
it's and what's important to recognize is, you
know, there there's a level of you have
to understand. These people are some of the
most known people in the world,
and they and we'll even if we're just
trying to be fair, like, not honest about
it, that they're just known and people hate
them because they're politics.
Or if we're gonna be honest about it,
they're all effing war criminals that commit genocide
and murder, occupation, and theft all over the
world. So whether we should care that he's
safe or not, it's not the point. It's
that there's a rationale for why these people
very much need security. That's a pretty crazy
move.
I mean, give me your thoughts about it.
I just thought that was pretty wild. And
I'm curious to what that actually plays out
as, what it means. Like, Fauci? I don't
care. That frankly, because I don't think he
it's it's an odd position to require it
on top of the fact that he is
a terrible person.
But this is just interesting. I'll leave it
there. But let me know what you think
about that.
Now I had a great interview I played
today with Charlie Robinson of my macroaggressions.
Trump says US will take over Gaza. We
discussed that kind of developing conversation and the
future of independent media. We talked about his
purchase of activist post, Natural Blade, which I'm
very happy about,
and the Independent Media Alliance, which he's a
part, and just a bunch of other conversations
about, you know, or other talking points around
that.
This is the future of where this is
going.
It's a great conversation. Really, had just a
couple of things in line that we were
gonna get to. And then one thing I
like about him is we can just have
a conversation. We just talked for about, I
don't know, hour and forty five minutes about
a lot of stuff. My plan was to
get right into actor's post and and stuff
just you know, that's what I love about
the show, though, is that we can just
kinda let it go where it goes. Then
we got an interesting conversation about a lot
of stuff. Check it out, though. We get
into a few different points that we'll overlap
with today.
I also wanna show throw this out there.
Now but this is a a little book.
Oh, I actually forgot the
It's this right here.
Stupid thing.
You can't see it. Just in case, it's
a little book. Just think.
And it says doctor Robert Anthony. This was
a give there's a few of these that
my grandmother,
gave to me.
And it and it's interesting. It's like a
book
of little like, it shows right here. It's
a book of
rant like, little half page,
blurbs or little, you know, quotes or and
half of them don't even have a name
or anything. It's like somebody just wrote these
thoughts down. And not that I have to
get into what it is and all, I
just thought it was interesting. It's always worth
giving some of the credit, more credit's due
for the book that's made. But I just
said, don't dwell on the past mistakes. Now
this obviously is for individual.
This in no way should be like, forget
about the COVID problem or forget about our
government lying to us. That's not that's a
general concept. I'm talking about individually in your
life. Things that we've done. Things that, you
know, individually that I would have made mistakes
about or, you know, anything that you wanna
reflect on or dwell on. I simply said,
don't dwell on past mistakes. Learn from them,
and strive to do better in the future.
And it says, once you realize you have
given your power away,
you can make the direct the decision to
take it back. I just thought that was
a nice thought. There's a whole bunch of
little things like that in that book. But
today,
I think your power is being taken away.
I think it's being completely stripped. One by
one, step by step, just like you've always
been paying attention to, except now you're not
looking because or just like with COVID nineteen.
The Democrats seem to ignore the fact that
that was happening to a large degree because
it was their side doing it.
Same thing's happening to you right now. When
I speak like that because I none I
see myself as nonpartisan. I see it all
as a problem.
I know the ones I'm speaking to anyway
are you care.
I just think you're being strict. I think
they're misleading you. I think you part and
so I'm all I'm asking is you stand
back and think about it.
Is it still a win if you feel
the change is going in a bad direction
just because your side may be doing it?
If you have your power taken away, you
can simply make the decision to take it
back. And all it needs to be is
a decision to go, wait a minute. I'm
not gonna let this happen. At least I'm
gonna start questioning this because I don't feel
good about this. Don't let the partisan media
and your your neighbors or whatever else it
is convince you that you're just supposed to
go along because the other side's worse.
That will be written on your tombstone.
Oh, last point on the opening part here.
True Street Media made this point. And, again,
just about the larger misin you know, rather,
propaganda.
Actually, hold on a second. Did I get
rid of that? Okay. I thought I I
moved it once ahead. It was a little
post that we'll get into about Twitter and
Elon.
But this is about that overlap with with
Twitter and just social media. Internet in general,
as we talked about the information today, let's
realize that half the Internet is bots. That's
not my opinion. There's there's provable evidence about
that. But and probably more than that for
all I'm concerned. But overall, it's not all
like we would see on here. Some of
them have purpose.
But this person says, I'm convinced that most
users on this platform, Twitter, are aren't human.
And we know this, by the way. We
know that a huge portion aren't.
That's not up for debate.
So your question should be why and how
many of them are being used to convince
us of things that are supposed to be,
you know, free speech and genuine engagement.
This is the post, the comments, everything feels
manufactured and generated. I think we're all kind
of sensing that. Even people that are being
fed what they want to see, it starts
to feel strange or you get it. I
think a lot of people I see more
conservatives these days calling this out than ever.
And the conversation, she says,
I feel like there are only 500 real
humans. That's just her opinion.
At TrueStream Media, simply said, I wonder how
many, quote, people I interact with on here
or all the time aren't actually human. It's
kind of a chilling thought.
Think about it for a second and just
and and just at least be keep that
in your mind when you're dealing with this
platform. Two reasons. One, because
we're being gamed
every single day.
That doesn't have to be an Elon and
Trump. It's just that people could just be
on there trying to sell you something. The
point is that's happening every day on this
platform. But take a step back and ask
yourself, consider whether there is a larger play
happening. Even if they may think it's for
the larger rate greater good or whatever, that
there are people who are paying billions of
dollars, lots of influence, rooms full of people
just to get you to think a certain
thing. And if you still don't think that's
happening today, my god.
Maybe this isn't the show for you. It's
definitely there.
But I wanna point out a couple things
on this, and this opens the conversation here
for what we're gonna get into to start
today, which is the main point,
technocracy.
And I really wanted to highlight two two
a couple different things
in the lead up to it. Now we
talked about the ethics pledges. There's a reason
why I'm gonna re reference that again today
because it's important to think about as we
go into this next part, but also the
admission, the leaked evidence showing that they are
planning to do exactly what we all thought
or anybody with a brain probably saw coming,
which is the whole efficiency angle was about
using artificial intelligence. Boom. My god. Bombshell. I
think we all thought of that.
But that's not something we wanted to acknowledge,
especially those who pretended this was the not
fight the the fighting great reset sort of
feeling, and it's not. It's the opposite.
Before we get to that and the overlap
with Catherine's article, which shows you this is
just transparently what I think is happening,
he says, thanks, Elon, for demonstrating how political
censorship works. Now this has to do with
the overlap of the point we we started
with, the Gaza
We started with the Gaza Riviera rebuilding point,
which people like Patrick Henningsen has been pointing
out from the moment this started because he's
always been paying attention. And the moment this
started, he, hey, pointed back to the old
plan. Look at this old plan they've had
about making this into a a little
prison for for people in Gaza. And then
they floated it to you again as some
kind of new island for Palestinians.
Woo. Fancy new music.
And we're going like, are you effing kidding
me? Like, that is crazy the way they
try to repackage
things that were very, very I mean, things
that were about subjugation.
And so my point in this is he's
showing you, look. Here's Jared Kushner literally telling
you we're gonna rebuild this area way back
in Trump's last administration. Or rather, no. This
this was before this administration.
And he's just simply telling you, like, this
there's beautiful property there. And now the Riviera
quote, which comes from the settlement movement and
this. I mean, how do you not see
what's happening? At the very least, that Trump
is being manipulated into thinking it's about something
else, which I always give you that point
because I don't know for sure.
But I really don't think that's the case
based on so many other factors. Point being,
I think Trump's well aware of what's happening.
And we'll get to that as well about
the fact that
these people think he's a prophet in some
cases, and it really terrifies me that we've
got his administration is packed with people who
are not just pro Zionists, that are literally
of the mind that we're about to be
in end times.
You realize how terrifying that is for somebody
who has that much power, who literally control
a nuclear arsenal, who genuinely the secretary of
defense, the I mean, Hegseth, Rubio. These guys
will Rubio as well, but let's just say
Hegseth and specifically the new aspects of this
are outwardly
outwardly
of the mind that Zionism and all that
this is a biblical right to these areas,
that they are the chosen all these things
that are hardly about America First. And secondarily,
they're showing you right now with every action
they take that that's the first thing they
care about. Every person they're meeting, the phone
calls they're making.
Pam Bondi talking about taking action against October
7. That's happening right now.
Okay. What about America First? I mean, we
barely started, and everything we hear is about
Israel.
We told you so.
Right? Totally.
Clearly, that's where they're going. I mean, like
somebody who's what about North Carolina? What about
what about Lahaina? What are all these people
that you guys spent year? We well, there's
still something. There's still, you know, motions in
that direction, but the immediate funding and immediate
words and action have all gone towards Israel.
Same thing.
But he points out, here's proof
that, free speech absolutist, Elon Musk, is deleting
embarrassing videos of Donald Trump's son.
And it
says, oh, son-in-law, Jared Kushner, admitting plan to
build beach resort. Now he post this, and
I I'm actually the one that showed him
this. That's that I sent him that picture.
I just simply said, hey. You know, what
is this? I said, do you happen to
know what these videos were? I was curious
that they were deleted.
And I and I when I posted that
in the chat to to Patrick, I noticed,
wait a minute.
The the videos are there. But when I
look at it, it shows this. It shows
them gone, which it still does, by the
way. Where, did I have it up? Well,
I guess I don't have the actual link.
Oh, that's right there. See? Video has been
deleted.
Which, to his from his side, apparently, they
don't show as deleted. But I posted in
the chat and it shows the video. So
I'm like, woah. You know, what's going on
here? Because I just wanted to know what
the videos were. So he responded going like,
woah. It's crazy. And he made this whole
post about it. And he simply said that
it's there's proof that he's deleting them because
what he's showing you is the fact that
they had planned for what's happening.
He says, to be clear, after you've massacred
and maimed two hundred thousand residents, targeted and
destroyed all their infrastructure, hospitals, clinics, universities, mosques,
churches, homes, and businesses, then helping them by
ethnically cleansing the survivors and
frog mach frog marching them into desert encampments,
new concentration camps.
That's what I call coming to the rescue.
Delete. Delete.
I mean, these guys, you just can't miss
this. Who is being who is
I mean, who are the dishonest people out
here that are unwilling to acknowledge this is
happening?
And they go and then on top of
that, what you can see right there, see
how it's grayed out? That's not Patrick. And
he says, x is also placing some kind
of restriction commenting under most of my tweets.
You can reply.
Or it says, you know, you can't reply.
You've never seen this before. You can down
here. But underneath this, original tweet, you can't.
Isn't that strange? I mean, I don't know
how many things we have to point out
like this. These aren't just glitches or some
hangover Democrat, guys. They are suppressing content no
longer just about Israel, which is but this
is also connected, but about their administration
and things that embarrass them. I mean, Elon's
been caught, which we'll show in a second,
many times already bombastically.
H one b visas, and we're gonna the
censorship point we just got into. And still
people just kinda push everybody away and say,
you're wrong. You're you're misled. No. That's that's
okay because terminal service.
Who would make up an entire story if
it even hinted that it was a democrat.
It is infuriating, and I'm seeing more conservatives
start to call it out than ever.
And he says, no replies allowed. Twitter is
enforcing this on certain
critical political posts.
Wild.
Now
we talked about
on the fifteenth and a few other shows,
the missing ethics pledges.
Trump himself essentially just reworked the the the
dynamic, watch the show for yourself and you
see what I mean, to the point to
where he didn't even do anything new. In
fact, he actually boxed out some of the
confront ones from the Biden side of it.
People have written about this. I mean, I
I covered this about three weeks before inauguration
and then again in a couple weeks. And
people like bond plenty of others in his
administration,
as you can just look up for yourself
or watch this show, have never signed these,
Musk included. And I'll show you why. He
has a special circumstance, apparently.
But my worry about is specifically Musk. But
just to forget don't forget. What did I
say when I was talking about this? Everyone
said, ah, right. No big deal.
Ah, it's a small thing. I was like,
well, let's wait and see what happens. Maybe
they'll sign them. And now we're at a
point where it seems not even the Democrats
cared. How do you explain that?
And what did the person say who was
managing the process? He said, look. There could
be a foreign government funding Trump and his
team, and we wouldn't even know. That was
the exact statement.
Damn right. That's my point.
And here we are. Maybe it's because the
other side of the paradigm or just, you
know, all of your government doesn't care about
that problem, if it's a certain person.
That's my opinion. But my god. How is
this not talked about? I still think that's
wild.
Sorta like East Palestine or other topics that
were like, how is no. Conyers, Georgia. Where
is everybody? Well, nope. Nope. Nope. There's either
no partisan draw or a very clear reason
they don't want to talk about it.
But to that point, this is an article
from Fortune. It says, White House confirms Elon
Musk is a special government employee
who could avoid publicly disclosing finances and conflicts
of interest and will only work for a
hundred and thirty days a year, which actually
is not correct if you will get through
it.
So this is just wild to me. That
and this is kinda what we expected. Right?
But just think about that and what's going
on. Like, before,
this was going like, well, yeah. That that
seems like it makes sense. But now with
these oh, I mean, like,
over
over reaching moves is a little that doesn't
even do it justice.
The treasury, the dynamic with I mean, The
U even The USA dynamic. Like, there's points.
You know my opinions on this. We, as
TLAB, myself
personally, have been calling out USAID as a
CIA regime change front for a decade.
It's not breaking news, ladies and gentlemen. If
you just found out, we've been try but
it's also not partisan, and that's how they're
trapping people that only just found out about
this in some corner part of the conversation
with people like Cat Turd acting like it's
a Democrats, and we all know. I mean,
it's the most transparent part of this story.
And we are we unaware that Donald Trump
used USAID for multiple regime change efforts? I'll
go through it. I'll go through the obvious
data that is on the same page they're
all using that proves
it's not partisan
or the fact that it's clearly not just
left leaning media, but, you know, that's the
way this game is played.
We'll get into that.
This point is about the fact that Elon
Musk has now started taking these huge moves,
and he's technically not even like, he he
has there's no
oversight.
There's no I mean, look. And I'm not
gonna say that I the the other parts
of our government are, like, the people are
supposed to keep them in line. They're all
effing criminals. But the point is nonetheless the
same. Is that let's just say there are
other people who, like, the whole the the
way we frame this is in the past.
Whereas that you have people they're all breaking
the law in very certain ways. But usually,
when they do things like this that rock
the boat, they self correct. And that's when
you see, you know, sort of like the
mafia, which I think is what it's really
about.
Now we're watching these major moves that are
making the rest of the control structure seemingly
uncomfortable, and I think we're or at least
that's that could be fake. But I think
that's showing us that kind of changing of
the guard where you've got these older elements
of the government structure who, at the end
of the day, will still end up using
whatever happens to control your life, but would
rather do it their way. Now we're seeing
the technocratic drive take over.
But so at the end of the day,
we're watching this hundred and thirty days.
Turns out to be not true.
Or the fact that he doesn't have to
disclose his finances, conflicts of interest. I mean,
the guy is literally being tapped by by
Netanyahu
or has all kinds of dark funding. We
don't know what's going on, and this guy
has complete so here's the point. He has
this much control
over the treasury, six trillion dollar he has
so much control over this, and he doesn't
we don't even know who might be influencing
him. We don't he doesn't have to sign
any disclosures. We don't know. The how is
that not the most terrifying thing? Remove the
person from your mind. Just because you think
you know Elon, you don't. You don't know
what these people are. You want to believe,
and I hope you're right. But just take
him out of the conversation. How can we
ever feel better about this much of a
consolidation of power when you don't even get
to know who this person might be puppeted
by?
That's just basic understanding. Just because a Democrat
in congress makes that same point, it doesn't
mean it's not true. And on top of
that, that's why I think that's largely happening
if you believe my understand my worldview that
these people are ultimately on the same side.
But it says the White House confirmed Monday
that Musk is a special government employee, whatever
that means.
A position that permits him to perform limited
activities in the government, well, clearly not. What
he's doing is the opposite of limited. But
he goes, like service
on committees and boards. Clearly not just controlling
an entire agency. But he goes, though, he
won't be on the government's payroll, which is
the way they're playing this according to the
White House. And that's where they go. So
he's doing it at the goodness of his
heart. The guy first of all,
the claim is, which I think there's reason
to doubt, is that he's the richest person
in the world. Either way, he's very wealthy.
None of these people care about the paycheck
they gain. You all know that. It's peanuts
compared to what they can make just by
having that power,
as Pelosi is clearly showing you, but so
are all of them. So what's hilarious to
me is that this guy that's the way
you frame. It's such an easy way to
play it. If you always pretend they're altruistic,
well, it all looks right.
But the really the the point is you
don't see you're not looking at anything. You're
looking at your your eyes are closed. You're
listening to you're listening to Elon explain to
you what it looks like. And you go,
oh, okay. Perfect.
Even though you're not looking at it. You
open your eyes, and it's a technocratic person
being built around you. But, of course, he
says so.
Ah, just do it out of the good
is my heart
while I'm taking massive control and power and
and we're you know, it's it's
basically naive even if you're right to think
that without knowing for sure. But it says
Musk is under a tight deadline. He's permitted
to work no more than a hundred and
thirty days a year. It's what what it
says anyway. We'll get there.
Elon Musk is selflessly serving president Trump's administration
as a special government employee, and he has
abided by all applicable federal laws, says the
White House secretary. Caroline, leave it because they
wrote it down in his paper for her
and she repeated it. Clearly, she's already been
stating and being wrong about
half of what she's put out, which by
the way is not unique to their administration.
KJP was just as ridiculous.
I think that's why they picked them because
they're just repeaters.
At the end of the day, he has
not abided by all applicable laws. You could
argue that things weren't necessarily
elite. There's really very clear things that he's
already completely jumped over, and that's why this
whole conversation is there. So that's just them
lying. Somebody I I read I read a
great point about something Whitney's talked about a
lot. If you don't know Donald Trump's very,
very close relationship with the late Roy Cohn,
who is just a mobster mafioso, basically
argument being, basically, Donald Trump just emulates that
style, which is deny everything until your death
and just double down, double down, you're winning
no matter what. It very much does make
sense.
In this case, same thing. Just keep lying
to your through your teeth even when you
know you're caught because you just do that's
that's government for you. But it says Musk,
who is affiliated with Tesla, SpaceX, Twitter, The
Boring Company, Neuralink, and xAI,
you know, DARPA's program that he's now taken
over even though I don't wanna tell you
that, would be required to file a disclosure
report if his decision making quote could have
an economic effect on a nonfederal entity. So
then, obviously.
But they're not doing that. So that's the
point. That that's what they're claiming.
That's the Department of Justice ethics rules.
So seeing as how we just literally had
an economic effect on damn near everything going
on
right there proves that they're already breaking those
rules. But it says, however, only special government
employees getting paid,
excuse me, at a certain level
and working more than sixty days are required
to publicly disclose finances.
Okay.
So because he doesn't take a paycheck he
doesn't need, it's an easy way to skirt
these. But I guarantee he's gonna work more
than sixty days as well as more than
a hundred and thirty. So there's already a
mixed bag in there. But the bottom line
is that if you have somebody taking this
much control, especially
when they're clearly not within the the line
of whatever special appointment he has, and you
don't have info information on what he might
be doing or who he what is what
master he might be serving,
everyone should be uncomfortable with that. And you
would be if it was a Democrat, and
you damn well know it. You take everybody
there's not any Democrat in existence
that would be in that position to do
the same thing even within the law without
every single person who's now supporting this freaking
out. And all that shows you is that
that becomes it's hypocrisy.
Just because you think you can trust Elon
does not mean you know Elon Musk.
So the fact that it's okay if he
does it, but it wouldn't be okay if
a Democrat was doing it shows that you're
a hypocrite because it's the action that matters,
not the puppet stand in person or whatever
you think about them. It's just a body.
The action should be what we're concerned about,
not because they might be dishonest about it.
They all might be dishonest about it. You're
choosing not to think that.
That's very clearly how this is going. Because
you are we are we gonna pretend like
this would all be okay if it was
any Democrat?
Think about it for a second.
Now on the fact that he's running all
these companies and then also can benefit himself,
which is usually the way this works. They
usually push themselves out of these or or
pretend to like Trump does or all of
them, really, but not even that. So he's
immediately taking action. How about the fact that
he's oh, here. This is one of the
things I was gonna point out.
The the reason I think they went with
at least pointing to OpenAI in Sam Altman
is so it wouldn't be that transparent that
him would rolling out an AI infrastructure,
$500,000,000,000
worth,
when he's involved with the AI, clearly,
everybody would be like, come on. That's just
so far in your face. But now we're
pretending that's not what's happening.
And it says only special government, then this
is typically publicly traded company CEOs
resign, which he's not doing.
Because they have because the main point as
usual is they have a food a food
a fiduciary
excuse me. A,
why am I saying that wrong? Fuduciary.
Fudiciary duty to their shareholders that could potentially
conflict or create an appearance of a conflict
with their government role. It simply means that
they're obligated, legally speaking, to make a profit
for their shareholders.
It's it's for a reason, so they can't,
you know, to have ulterior motives. The point
is we can at least bank if we
put you in that position that you are
acting in good faith to make a a
profit. Right? And so in this point,
he has a legal responsibility to make money
for this company. But so if he's seen
in taking action for the government that would
undermine that that responsibility, then that would be
he would be in breach of his well,
so that that's the point. There's going to
be this a situation like that. And I'm
gonna go ahead and argue he will air
on the side of his
profit, and that will be a conflict with
the cool yeah. I didn't take money. That
this is how it's gonna go. It'll end
up in congress. And
right now, they're already rolling out an impeachment
for Trump, which is basically what we all
told you. This is what the government is
now. It's four years of fighting against the
other side, so nothing ever gets looked at.
We're all distracted just like last time. Whatever
happened? This is what I keep saying. Where's
the outcome? Whether Trump or Biden or Democrat
or Republican, there's all a bunch of screening
narratives.
Yes. There's things that have happened. Money has
changed hands, but nobody's ever had any actual
legal responsibility when it comes
to anything other than than money.
Any of them. Hunter, Trump, Clinton, anybody.
Despite all that we've seen, even the lawsuits
and actions against Trump. I mean, seriously, we
all have to stand back and recognize that
it's that appears to be all theater. And
now I bet you it'll go the same
way. With four years of impeachment trials and
all the it'll be a good show,
but I bet you nothing happens unless they're
truly shifting this for the last time. Trump
has effectively handed Musk the keys to the
candy store, says the law professor at Washington
University.
Doge and Musk, by extension,
now has access to the Treasury Department's payment
system responsible for $6,000,000,000,000
in disbursements, including
federal salary, Social Security.
Now just as a thought experiment, guys, if
we're wondering, since we don't actually know, whether
this might be in the benefit of somebody
else, whether somebody might be using him,
The obvious possibility. But maybe just China, if
it makes you feel better.
Ask yourself how that doesn't make you uncomfortable.
That much potential money, that much potential fraud,
crime, when you know that there's no way
to know what he might actually be doing
just because you want to believe in him
is not a fact.
Anybody would be you would all be screaming
if it was a Democrat. Or how about
just not a Republican? Or even a Republican
that you thought was a rhino? Everybody's
that seems very clear to me.
Says though Democrats have argued a presidential administration
does not have the constitutional authority, they don't,
to eliminate entire agencies. It says some 100
USAID staffers are placed on administrative leave. Now
that appears to have been paused because of
a judge ruling. We'll come back to that
in a minute. The point, though,
is that the it's the same thing as
general as I'm against the government at large,
and I think they're all corrupt. But nonetheless,
as we'll get to with Catherine pointing it
out,
is that this there is a process, like
I was saying. And if you if you
go through this process
in an illegal way because you're saying that
you're claiming they did it first, which shows
you as I keep as I say in
war or anywhere else, that makes you just
the same.
All it does is open the door up
for one, courts to pull back on that
later, which will only make so it's an
illusion. Right? They'll be able to go, look.
You broke the law, so that's no longer
valid. That's possible. But also the fact that
all you're doing is changing one corrupt regime
for another, and they just are corrupt in
the direction of what you like that time.
That's a guaranteed cycle that will never change
until they're ready for it to change.
Anybody
not part being objective can see this.
Right? So if we're doing these things, which
are objectively the case, which is like, first
of all, not even the presidential administration. You're
talking about a special appointee
only supposed to be here for a hundred
thirty days who's now suddenly disbanding
entire groups,
taking hold of $6,000,000,000,000
of funding as a special representative with no
conflicts of interest outlined, no ethics pledges. No.
I mean, it it seems ludicrous.
And then, of course, all you need is
to say, look. The Democrats are angry. That's
how we know it's the deep state. That's
the kind of fact checking or the kind
of journalism you're getting from people on the
we are the media now.
Can't you see how scared the deep state
is from Ben Johnson and the rest of
them? I'm going, okay. Wait a minute. So
I'm all I'm all for the understanding that
there is an unelected power structure. Right? We
all seem to agree on that.
But so when you say the deep state
is x, y, and z, do you have
any evidence to back that up? Right? And
that you you understand what I'm saying. Like,
I'm not even in disagreement that there's a
clear dynamic happening here. But if you're claiming
to say the deep state's running scared or
not even like that, like, if you read
some of the things that Johnson was posting,
saying that, you know, that's just how the
deep like, making a point of it.
My point I'm getting at is that all
they're really doing is just arbitrarily
deeming the deep state as if it's one
thing or entity, like, works at some location.
It's not. It's an unelected power structure that's
very, very broad and un and we all
have different opinions about it. And they're just
saying, then this is happening because it's easy.
Because you'll think it's what he point to,
which means the Democrats.
That's how dumb this is. So half the
Democrats of the clearly appointed positions, which I'm
not saying elected,
are the deep state,
even though they're not unelected and clearly don't
have all the power we I mean, really,
guys? We can't be that stupid, that easy
to manipulate.
A team from Doja continues, including four staffers
under the age of 30, reportedly clashed with
a US Aid Security Official
who refused to give the staffers access to
a room with sensitive materials. We this is
the story we already covered.
After making a call to Musk, who told
the US Aid Official he would would involve
the US Marshals Service
to threaten him,
should his team not have access to the
secure information,
the staffers were reportedly able to have at
least partial access to the secure room. Now
realize this was written,
well, I guess there's still just it's one
day ago, but the point is this is
a minute ago. Right? This was a back
and forth.
But just think about what we already highlighted.
If you were this position now, yes, of
course, I guarantee you left right paradigm plays
a factor in these people because they're all
trapped in it. But if you stand back
and think about it, you're sitting in this
position. Right? A special appointee who you know
well has no actual legal authority to make
these moves goes, get out of the way.
And who knows if he if if Trump's
even spoken up at this point yet. Right?
Because that wasn't clear. Then he goes, well,
hold on a minute. Like, this is wild.
Like, what and and they just make a
big story about it. And all oh, he
got dragged out of no. He didn't. They
literally asked the the woman we're talking about
actually just, like, walked out with somebody, but
they all they in big capitals, Nick Sorens
of the world dragged dragged the building.
Why? Because it's gets more clicks and shares.
But what actually happened? Who's in control?
I mean, it maybe make you feel better
because you assume that that guy was some
secret Democrat, or maybe he was. But Elon
is the one that's better.
All you're doing is consult you're consolidating
power into a smaller group of people. You're
literally helping them build this thing out.
At least ask that before you just start
cheering for whatever the team told you to.
And I'm it's not easy to say that
this guy or the other
the other grouping of people was even good
was the good guys. No. That's not even
remotely the point.
Right now, I think the major idea is
using clear things that we all disagree on
to trap you into the next choice, which
doesn't mean we should stay that first thing
is still good to go away. Yes. Period.
But then be on guard for the next
thing.
It says, despite Musk's seemingly around the clock
work schedule, the enforcement of the special government
employees' a hundred and thirty day rule appears
lax.
Oh, interesting.
With no explicit penalties for
going beyond it.
Interesting how you have a position where somebody
can
you'd be penalized for working more than you're
supposed to. But what's crazy about it is
all this shows it to be is an
illusion.
It says if the s, the special government,
e is a what? Appoint ex you know,
the special appointee, what what they're claiming he
is, is unexpectedly
serves more than a hundred and thirty days,
they remain
a special appointee for the remainder of that
period.
Oh, okay. So basically, should they just decide?
He can just serve entire four years.
Great.
I mean, that's not to say that's gonna
happen, but
so this just is a basic illusion. They're
using this whole thing to make it seem
like he's not part of the government, but
this starts to feel like he is a
central part for something else.
He's literally like the second in command it
feels with a lot of people pointing that
out, and he's not even technically part of
the government other than appointee.
And we don't get to know the conflict.
All the same points. It is pretty damn
crazy.
And, of course, all they're gonna say is,
oh, you're just Trump Derangement Syndrome. You're Democrat.
None of those things. I would say this
about any politician that was doing this, and
you guys know that if you're watching this
show.
And it says it the the then it
goes on to say, according to a March
2024 ethics briefing from the US Department of
com commerce, and it says, but during the
next three hundred sixty five day period,
the appointing official should reevaluate
whether or not he should be designated. Oh,
so Trump. So, basically, should Trump decide,
regardless of the the illusion of the status,
he could just be there until the administration's
done with basic with no. Not basically. With
zero oversight, accountability,
insight at all, other than Trump. But I
think the point is that they're doing this
together.
I find that to be very concerning.
Now the overlap of the story
that you've seen kind of probably spin out
is this conversation, and this overlaps with the
censorship point of the people
who are working for Doge.
Whatever that is and whatever this looks like.
Remember, that's US digital services simply renamed as
Doge. That's all it is. And they're building
out your digital infrastructure, guys. It's very transparent.
Doge employees identified
prosecution possible, US Attorney. Now the reason I
wanted to point that out is because remember,
the whole game was we're gonna go after
the people that exposed their names. Well, guess
what? The names were already public, put in
an article. And then also on Twitter before
the people got censored, and Elon Musk said,
yeah. Great people. Aces at Doge.
So it's a lie, guys. And the US
attorney seems to be aware of that as
best I can tell and still makes this
big bombastic claim. We're gonna go after these
people. No. What they're gonna do is go
after people that he pointed to. I think
it's right here.
Unless I didn't include it. No. I didn't
include it. Of the people that were on
Reddit
saying, go after the people of this position.
That has nothing to do with people that
you censored on Twitter because you claimed they
broke the law. They did not. They didn't
even violate terms of service. It was a
public it was names in government positions, which
we have a right to know anyway. On
top of that, it was already publicly posted
more than once.
So think about a while. My my point
was I called it out at the time.
I said, the US attorney,
he Elon sent him a letter, and he
stood up and said, we're gonna look after
the all because I was meant to, I
think, distract you from what just happened, making
it sound like there was a real crime
we're investigating.
No. It let's be very clear about this.
They did not. The person who he deleted,
which is right here,
And by the way, maybe we'll see if
it's even back.
There it is.
Nope. Still gone.
Ray inside out
is gone
because right here, he simply posted a list
of these people, which we can prove and
I already did in the last show, was
already public. And he said, you've committed a
crime. Well, it's interesting how Pauley posts the
same screenshot, nothing happens because the guy didn't
commit a crime. This was either Elon making
trying to use this for some other reason
to distract people, or he made another irrational
action because he thinks he can do whatever
he want. He seems to be able to,
and
then just made a big story about it.
That's wild, isn't it? So here, we're gonna
get into these people's names and who we're
talking about here.
But this first,
Forbes, on the fourth, writes Doge employees identified
on Twitter.
Doxing or case of free speech? The fact
that we have to pretend like this is
a hard question is embarrassing.
It says the names of six employees of
the newly formed department of government efficiency,
just again, the renaming of US digital services.
It's easy to look up. That was right
in the executive order. More commonly known as
Doge on Sunday were posted on Twitter, the
social media platform owned by Musk. The reason
they have to write that out is because
people are still confused by calling it x.
It says the billionaire tech entrepreneur
who also head up Doge quickly responded to
the posting of names writing on Twitter saying
you have committed a crime.
For the record, Wired also revealed the names
before that post, by the way. That was
the first example of the six engineers who
are described as being in their teens and
early twenties. That's true. There has since been
a wave of criticism of it that individuals
with no high level experience in the public
sector were given access
to the Department of Treasury. That's the $6,000,000,000,000
we're talking about. So add that to the
uncertainty
that he's worried we're gonna get their names.
Why?
Like, what's the what's going on here? And
why are these people these young entities? Like,
I think we know what's happening, what we
already started with.
Now it says,
even the claims of doxxing may seem a
bit of an overreach as this is typically
seen to involve releasing of someone's personal information.
Like, it's like it's almost like they're going
out of their way to make it seem
like a fair point. It's just it's simply
not doxxing. It does not meet the definition
of doxxing. No matter what you try to
argue. Their names were already public, and their
names are of people working for the government.
Are we are we are we are we
pretending like we're in a I'd rather
we're always pretending we live in a place
where we have these rules to follow, but
are we now admitting that we don't live
in that place? That we can just they're
gonna we don't want you to know who
we are because we're in control of your
lives?
But it says, as that is typically seen,
or it says, in this case, all that
was released was the names of government workers
taking the lead on the newly formed agency.
One that was also created without any oversight
from lawmakers, by the way. And it says,
typically, government employees have less privacy protections than
do private citizens. Also worth worth considering. Listing
individuals who are working on behalf of the
government would not fall into definition of doxxing.
Elon Musk's free speech absolutism position, which is
not his real position, should apply to all
situations if he truly holds those beliefs.
However, the leaked case of Doge employees or
the h one b I add in the
last example
has shown there are exceptions to the rule
for Musk,
obviously. But, of course, it's on Forbes, so
it's Democrats fighting him. No. It's the obvious
truth, and they're just pointing it out because
it works for them. They're all opportunists.
She added that merely sharing names of people
working for Doge is not doxxing. Woah. My
god. Bombshell.
Okay. And here's this again so you can
see it.
Now here is Elon Musk or excuse me,
Donald Trump in responding
on the fourth
to the question about these people's names. Do
you know who they are? So let's be
clear again, and we'll get into it more
in a second. These are people working with
Elon Musk, and that's the ones we're apparently
told are there. I'm sure there's more than
that, who are working on the system. And
what are they doing? They're changing it despite
lying about that. We'll get into it in
the Wired and the Daily Beast article before
Katherine's. And this is about them making changes
in a $6,000,000,000,000
system for the government.
To what end?
I mean, how do we not know they're
simply changing things so we don't even notice
money flying out for something else? Maybe they're
allotting money in places we don't know where
it's going. Like, we have no idea.
That's what happens when you have even the
illusion of oversight, they're supposed to pretend like
they're showing nothing. We get nothing. And that's
being cheered on as this as the win
because it's not the other side.
Do you not see how obviously you're being
played? I mean, that's terrifying to me. Now
here is what Trump said when asked about
who these people are.
Don't you think if he was in he
would know who these people are, if they're
the ones making these kind of moves?
Those engineers that Elon Musk has helping him
are as young as 19 years old. That's
good. They're very smart, though, Peter. They're like
you. They're very smart people. Thank you.
Has he have you met any of these
guys? No. I haven't seen them. They work
actually out of the White House. They're smart
people.
Unlike what they do in the control towers
where we need smart people, we should use
some of them in the control.
Oh, okay. So just lurch right into the
FFA, woke politics, DEI point because that's what
the talking points are. Right? If as long
as you get them upset about how down
the Democrats are, we'll ignore everything else. Well,
at least the team sport Republicans will.
It's not the majority in my opinion, but
it very clearly works for them.
Is where we were putting people that were,
actually intellectually
deficient.
That was one of the qualifications
is you could be intellectually
deficient. And as we showed you, which is
very easy to look at,
last show,
same exact stuff was up during Trump's administration.
Do you know how you know how I
mean,
we'll get into a segment in a minute
about the Gaza Conners point. Again, overlapping of
many different examples, especially with the USAID point.
There has been
a waterfall
from groups like Wall Street Apes and I
Mean Therefore I Am. Like, major million follower
accounts that are in Elon Musk's orbit,
Bob bastically sharing very easy to prove false
claims about USAID.
That doesn't mean that everything they're saying is
false. My point either they don't care,
which shows you the we are the media
now dynamic, or
they're knowingly sharing anything that's in that direction
because it's really just about overwhelming the conversation.
Either way, guys, it's crazy to me. Right?
So don't forget.
The Donald Trump administration
had the same FFA page up during his
administration last time. Had the same thing for
the so if you're gonna make it the
point is they'll probably make an argument about
how
it was, you know, the Democrat person in
the position that that he let be there,
that he appointed, or, you know, either way
you spin it. It's the same game. If
you're gonna make that Biden's responsibility even though
he's not the one at in charge the
other day, I would agree. It's still his
responsibility. It's his administration. That's what happened. Same
thing applies to Donald Trump. So if he
had the exact same page up during his
administration,
which I know he knows,
then he is simply using this and still
lying about it to distract from what they're
being asked about,
which seems to be a very untouchable conversation.
Don't let's not really get into what Elon
Musk is doing and what they might be
doing.
Ask yourself why.
No. We need smart people. Some are young,
and some are not young. Some are not
young at all,
but they found great things. What a dumb
thing to say. I'm so tired of his
languishing, like, kind of we see there's some
are young, some not so young at all.
Oh, so it mean just they exist in
the age spectrum? Fantastic.
Way to break it down for us, Donald
Trump. He's just rambling, and it's all about
trying to get away from what the question
really was. I'm telling you guys, that's what
happens every single time. Oh, I'm sorry. The,
the FFA.
I've just just said a I'm glad you
typed that in the chat actually. I wanna
see if I can get that to come
up.
Here we go. Perfect.
Let's see if this one's there.
If this is the right one.
Yep. Look at that. Well, what do you
know? Got that to be saved. Hopefully for
the people that were just trying to pretend
in the chat that it's not real. It's
always one. This is 2019.
Donald Trump's
diversity and inclusion
for the FAA.
It's right there, guys. It's identical to the
page they're all criticizing. And you know what's
worse? I promise you, the libs of TikTok
cat tur people of the world, they know
about this because people like me are dumping
it underneath them. They don't care. It doesn't
matter because if it's there, then it must
have been somebody else. Whatever the net whatever
you can makes yell out to make sure
you don't acknowledge that it's hypocritical
to only point out one side of the
conversation.
Now this is from NPR. It says member
of Elon Musk's Doge team resigns after racist
post resurfaced. Now to me, you know, obviously,
the fact that he's posting racist things matter
insofar that you care if he's racist. But
whether that matters about the larger conversation is
not really why I'm pointing it out. Something
about this seems interesting to me. The way
it was all going,
the fact that we don't have any real
oversight or accountability or insight about any of
what they're doing or who they are and
how weird he was about their names being
put out. And all of a sudden, this
guy, people start digging back, and they find
these pretty important racist points, one of which
talks about eugenics.
I find that important, guys.
But what's interesting is that he resigns
without any real pressure, which is interesting.
And then what happens is oh, sorry.
On the Trump screen still. Here we go.
Thank you, Angela.
Member of Elon Musk, Doge team resigns after
racist post resurface. And interestingly,
that what we'll come to in a second
is that he's now asking whether we should
let him back.
But it says, Marco Elas, which his name
will come up in another point,
A 25 year old software engineer was working
inside the treasury department to cut costs
and root out fraud
with no oversight.
Right? So this 25 year old software engineer
with Elon Musk
deciding to cut costs and root out fraud.
Now are we certain they're not doing this
at a partisan angle and assuming things are
fraud if it's a Democrat program? Well, guys,
we're already seeing some of that. That's not
to say that I mean, my opinion, I
think it all should government should go away,
but that's not the same conversation.
Right? Just because I agree that government at
large is bad and we should get that's
but they're selectively applying this in ways that
benefit something other than what we're looking at.
If they come up and just they literally
just disbanded everything and said it's all gone,
I would cheer. But that's not even remotely
what they're doing. They're consolidating power and changing
things for their immediate interest, which I'm gonna
get to, is for the out the rolling
out of this control structure.
And it says, you could not pay me
to marry outside of my ethnicity, was one
of the posts he shared. Now maybe that
matters to you more than anything else. I
mean, it should matter. Right? I mean, this
guy is literally saying something.
It will it shows you this is the
kind of per people that Musk seems to
be working around. But also that, ultimately,
it is a pretty disgusting statement.
And then whether that means it's because there's
overlaps with, I don't know, the most obvious
f racist organization in the world right now?
It's worth considering, seeing as how they all
seem to be very influenced by that, or
maybe there's a reason that overlap is there.
Maybe they're compromised. I mean, all the the
point is we don't know because there is
no way to find out because they've kept
this very shadowy. That's not the way freedom
and liberty and democracy is supposed to work.
So we should want democracy at all. But
it says
that's from September. And it goes, normalize Indian
hate, he says, in a separate post.
Interestingly, sounds like Laura Loomer. But it says,
in July of last year, the account posted,
just for the record, I was racist before
it was cool.
So for just owning that,
sounds like a very certain kind of the
conversation today, the kind of people that are
proudly pushing that out, which says something. Then
it says, this is the one that stood
out to me more than anything.
I just want a eugenic immigration policy.
Is that too much to ask?
Guys, this literally
pushing eugenics,
like, Nazi stuff, guys, and Israeli stuff. That's
what we're talking about. That's what they are
pushing forward. And if you already if you
don't remember the overlap of Zionism
and Nazism, then you you can look it
up on Wikipedia. It's that easy to find.
Except you're racist if you look at it.
It's basic facts. They worked with them through
the final solution. It's a very public story
that even Horetz covered, but we're not supposed
to talk about it. But it just shows
you the lie of the entire organization that
is Zionism.
So this guy is saying a eugenic immigration
policy.
So do you want these kind of people
making changes in $6,000,000,000,000
of funding?
I think these things ultimately matter in a
larger sense. This is why and I wouldn't
say that that invalidates somebody to the point.
This is why people are supposed to be
actually chosen by the people for positions.
That's That's what that's what we're talking about
in an unelected structure or, hopefully, get to
a point where we don't need government at
all. But the same point applies. You would
still have people that are appointed by their
community. This is unaccountable, oligarch, technocratic, Zionist
authoritarianism,
really, or rather dictatorship
from one ultimately, that's the executive order. It's
it's just unilateral.
Musk on Friday asked for his followers if
he should be reinstated
after making, quote, inappropriate statements through a now
deleted pseudonym,
And nearly 80% said yes.
I think I've got that right here.
78%.
Nineteen million views.
Bring back Doge staffer who made inappropriate statements.
Now, of course, the point would be, I'm
willing to bet you the vast majority down
there, I'd like to believe, don't know what
those statements were. They're probably going, oh, he
probably said something against woke culture.
That's the way they play this. No. He
straight up called for racism and eugenics.
I don't I think if they knew that,
they might think differently, but that's how this
game is played.
Now
the wire or wired points out the US
Treasury claimed
and this is where it gets interesting. I
think, as usual, what you're gonna see, guys,
is there's a puppet show going on.
Actions sometimes that are that make them look
sorta bad. But the I think, my opinion,
is that these things are being displayed in
the front window while this is what's going
on backside. This is what there's something bigger
happening around all of this stuff. The US
Treasury claimed Doge technologist
didn't have right access when he actually did.
So why would they lie about that? One,
I think it's because clearly what they're doing
is unilateral. I mean, there there's no precedent
for this. What they're doing is crazy.
Now interestingly, with Charlie Robinson, we talked about
this.
Hypothetically speaking, not to get into this now,
but it let's just say they went through
it this way and then legitimately
changed everything for just some freedom utopia.
Right, where they disbanded everything after that.
I mean, even I would ultimately go good,
positive.
I would still go, well, the way they
went at that was probably, you know but
it it happened, so we're good. Right? I
understand the logic of being in a situation
where the power structure is so unjust and
so dictatorial that they would ultimately stop you
from I get that.
So it's worth considering maybe this is the
only way to make it happen. Well, it's
worth considering. Sure. And I do. So if
we have a positive outcome other than just
the naming of things and statements and hype
you know, idea, then I then I would
at least consider that. But right now, we're
already seeing the indication of that not happening.
You know, obviously as well because they're supporting
a genocide. Kinda makes it easy to see.
But that aside,
my point is just that it's interesting that
that narrative is being used because it's something
that you might expect somebody who's against government
in general to be like, good. Tear it
all down.
But I don't think that's what's happening, guys.
And I think the problem is they're not
tearing it down at all. That they're really
just removing the window dressing and building this
consolidated power structure right in the center.
But it says US Treasury Department and White
House officials have repeatedly denied that technologists associated
with Elon Musk's so called Department of Government
Efficiency had the ability to rewrite the code
of the payment system through though,
through which the vast majority of federal spending
flows.
Wired reporting shows, however,
that at the time these statements were made,
a Doge operative
did, in fact,
have right access. And it gets worse the
next article.
So why are you lying about this stuff?
What are you changing? Well, guess what? We'll
probably never know.
How does that make anybody feel good? Just
because you want to believe that he makes
the right choice, if you'll never really ultimately
know
how to and that that is the it
answers your own question. I mean, if you're
standing back and
rightly critical of any power structure, this should
make you terrified.
Marco Iles.
Interestingly, the same guy that just resigned, and
now they're asking to come back. Maybe he's
already back for all we know.
This it didn't seem odd that this one
is the focal point in so many different
ways. It says, Ehlers was granted privileges, including
the ability to not just read, but write
code
on two of the most sensitive systems in
the United States government, the payment automated manager
and the secure payment system
at the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, an
agency that according to treasury records, paid out
$5,450,000,000,000
in fiscal year twenty twenty four.
So, again, you know where my mind's at
and concerns because of the obvious influence from
foreign governments. So why what what couldn't it
be possible if they could just change a
little bit of code and shave off money
to go to somebody else?
Absolutely.
I mean, realize because of the inner structure
and centralized control of Musk and Trump, they
could do whatever they want. I'm not saying
that's what's happening.
So here, David Icke points out, based on
this article we're gonna get into before we
get into Kathlyn's, Kathlyn's article, the new leak
is on the fifth or published on the
fourth, reveals Musk's Musk's cronies plot to revamp
the federal government using AI.
Yeah. Just tell me I told you so
as I can't even keep count. Now Daily
Beast, this is not some Democrat platform,
which my point is none of that matters,
guys. I mean, it matters in some ways.
But at the end of the day,
how it the whole point we're making is
that this is all a construct. It's about
keeping you trapped in this time. You know,
what's funny is that republicans would love to
make fun of, you know, and many cases
should, people that are talking about the woke
politics and, you know, gender as a construct.
Well, guess what? You're trapped in exactly the
same thing with two party illusion. It is
an illusion in your mind. You've convinced yourself
that it's everything, and, really, it's the way
they're keeping you confused.
Certainly my opinion, but my god. You cannot
see it today. The the evidence of this
is everywhere.
So my point is that when you're having
this
back and forth, it it stops you from
recognizing that this kind of thing is rolling
out. David says exactly what I've been warning
about. Trump administration plans to deploy AI throughout
the government. They want they want to get
rid of employees because AI's plan to run
the show. So that's you could that's why
he's arguing anyway that Trump is getting rid
of the employees.
Right? See how that works? Now he could
be wrong, of course. But if you at
least can't if you can't consider that, I
think you're gonna blind yourself to very clear
problems that might come, which is that ultimately,
it feels nice for him to be shaving
off these employees and getting rid of different
groups. And in in the moment, good. I'm
saying good. The getting rid of the government's
you know, saving money, good stuff. Right? Depending
on ultimately how it's done and where it's
happening, but generally speaking.
But what if it's all the means to
an end to reduce the pop the potential
workforce in order to roll this out?
Just a thought. Right? But you have to
be able to stand back and consider these
things and not get blinded by your chosen
god ideologue.
Even if you believe in them, you should
be questioning them more than anybody. Maybe they're
being misled.
And it says and it shows that's why
Musk and the tech oligarchs are on board.
MAGA and the, quote, alternative media, mainstream alternative
media, he calls it, promoting these frauds.
You are turkeys voting for Christmas and Thanksgiving.
That's a good way to put that. And
here's the article he points to.
It says a leaked recording
on Tuesday revealed that Trump's administration's plans to
use AI
to help rewrite
a large chunk of the federal government's computer
systems.
Okay. Well, seeing as how we just found
out that one of these people that resigned
because of racist posts talking about eugenics
was actually doing this, and we were lied
to about it.
Doesn't that seem interesting?
One of Elon Musk's associates,
who now holds a high level government post
in the Trump administration,
also urged federal employees to push forward
despite being told that his orders amounted to
an illegal task
according to audio, which has been leaked, of
a meeting obtained by technology publication four zero
four media.
Thomas Shed, a former Tesla engineer who is
now responsible for heading a team of government
coders at the General Service Administration's technology trans
transformation
services,
explained to employees at a recent meeting how
the Trump administration plans to deploy
artificial intelligence
throughout the government.
Now
right there alone,
I guarantee there are conservatives that don't want
that, who are very uncomfortable because of both
the AI overlap to the mRNA cancer shot
dynamic that's part of Stargate or the historical
conversation of the great reset and where that
all goes.
I mean, even Musk himself was warning this
would destroy humanity, but don't worry. I'll have
my good guy version. That's what he's doing.
The idea here is that this is not
what you were promised.
Using artificial intelligence to out throughout the government
was what we were telling you was what
the efficiency was really about, and we were
called blackpilled.
Here we are.
Now SHED also floated a plan to aggregate
employees' personal data
in a more centralized and accessible manner,
Something one employee later clarified was illegal
without the consent of the employees.
Rather, the people whose data it is. Right?
It says, quote, I think we are on
the topic of login aggregation data.
It's an illegal
task.
This is written in a submission by the
employee. Quote, the privacy act forbids agencies
sharing personal information without consent. You all know
this. This is basic.
Shed responded, and this is important, by brushing
the concern aside, stating and remember, this is
a leaked audio, so he wasn't aware that
you would hear this,
stating that the government will, quote, try to
get consent,
but that shouldn't stop them from moving ahead
of the project.
That's that's the kind this this is not
unique to left and right, guys. That's your
government. Always.
It says if we hit a roadblock, then
we'll hit a roadblock, but we should still
push forward to see what we can do.
Things are gonna get intense.
Yeah. They don't care, guys. That's the point.
Well, they'll get it to a point to
where they've invested something so they can rationalize
why we can't stop now, always, how this
goes. And lie to you through their teeth
the entire way like they always do.
Pardon me.
Continuing the article, it says,
among the plans shared
were a series of artificial intelligence coding agents
trained on current government code
that could write software to streamline
government processes.
The applications
envisioned for such artificial intelligence agents included a
centralized database of government contracts
that could then
be analyzed.
So, basically, getting artificial intelligence to map out
artificial intelligence.
Sure sounds like the the plot of every
dystopian movie ever made. The task to revamp
the federal government's computer system, however, is well
underway according to new reporting Tuesday from Talking
Point Memos. According to the publication,
Musk operatives
have already pushed
extensive code changes
to the Treasury Department's payment system,
which is responsible for making 95% of the
federal government's payments. 95%.
So we're talking
the entire budget.
I mean, 5% of how much they spent
is a ton of money, but the reality
being, that is everything.
The entire federal government payments, that includes Israel,
by the way. That includes everybody.
That's why the USA point is so important.
And I'm arguing, I think what we're seeing
is not only the covering up of now
what they'll be doing, but you you remove
the public face of the USAID
lie of about it being for humanitarian aid
and just go, well, they're a break. And
then and then shoving it under the state
department, which is where it already really was,
and Marco Rubio, and then going, now we're
gonna do it for US interest. Well, guess
what? They just removed your visibility of what
they're doing.
That you think that's gonna stop? Rubio is
explicitly telling you it's not gonna stop. Well,
a lot of the conservatives that have been
lied to by TeamSport Republicans are screaming US
aid is gone. We did it. Winning.
As they're literally telling you, that's the opposite.
We'll get to it in a second.
So 95%
of the federal funding, guys, they are
this is a coup that we're watching this
happen in real time.
One of Musk's staffers at his so called
department of government efficiency,
which, again, 25 year old Marco Elez, has
secured administrative privileges on the crucial system.
He says the changes
that have been made all seem to relate
to creating new paths
to block payments
and possibly leave less visibility
into what has been blocked.
Guys, that's exactly what I'm worried about.
TMP reported
while noting that it does not appear that
any payments have so far been blocked. So
So what they're really seem to be doing
is building out the system to where they
can do what they want and you can't
see it. That's exactly what I think is
happening.
And stop payments, which could be to democrat
NGOs
or anything else.
Sorta like the way they censor after what
you don't like and then turn around and
censor everybody else. And you go, woah. Woah.
Wait a minute. I only met them. Oh,
too late. You thought it was only gonna
apply to what you didn't like? That's always
how it works.
It's just so stupidly transparent. How do we
fall for this every single time?
Now this is where it gets
truly alarming.
This is one that you guys need to
read. Even after we talk about it, you
need to read this all the way through.
Trump administration.
Digital control grid coming together at high speed.
She writes, now that the Trump administration has
been in charge of the US executive branch
for two weeks, here is what appears to
be underway. Just two weeks, guys. Now think
about anybody else rolling out what you're gonna
see here. From digital IDs to land I
mean, everything.
Two weeks.
If it was a d by their name,
we would be marching through the streets. Sort
of like what happened during COVID nineteen when
Trump was in power. I made the same
point. If Obama had rolled out even a
fraction of what Trump was doing, Defense Production
Act, Marshall or, that's that's
production martial law or states of emergency.
I mean, any number of things, people would
have been flipping out.
I think it's there's a reason that they
these people are in place to keep you
pacified.
I don't think it's working like it was
last time, but the the propaganda
is far more effective right now. I mean,
it's hard to see. Where else do you
look? They're giving you this fake picture of
what they want you to think is happening
and where else you're gonna look. You You
just gotta remember that it is a fake
information ecosphere right now.
Here's what's already underway. Two weeks. Despite the
chaotic appearance,
the plan being implemented is highly strategic and
has been in the planning stages for quite
a while.
Looking through the fog of omniwar,
because that's where we are, this never ending
war, and that's how they use that, here
is what the high speed building of the
control grid looks like so far.
Digital IDs.
The Real ID is being supported with a
strong push through the states. The immigration effort
also appears to be supporting the combination of
digital IDs plus biometrics,
which we'll include, of course
this is the show I did on this
main point, the Save Act, Real ID, and
ID 2020
using two two party illusion and the election
to usher in digital IDs. There's multiple ways
this is happening.
Biden did his side of it with the
mobile driver's license dynamic. This is going to
fill the other side. That's the way I
see it. But either way, it's coming, and
they're rolling it out, and they they're telling
you.
And, you know, biometrics with Trump with the
biometric wall. It's all the same conversation.
Stargate data centers. The Stargate initiative involves the
building out of data centers sufficient to support
a complete control grid and all digital monetary
systems.
Also talked about Derek's article, Stargate, Trump partners
with technocrats to promote mRNA injections, AI, transhumanism.
Then Stargate mRNA injections. The proposal for personalized
mRNA vaccines in quotes for cancer and everything
else, indicates a plan to roll out the
injection program sufficient to implement the Internet of
bodies
and continue to lower life expectancy.
Then it should go. Stargate funding also helps
support the ongoing global out rollout of mega
vaccine factories, which Musk is a part of
with his with his Tesla overlap with the
factories themselves.
And that's what we talk about in the
show we did here. Donald Trump rolls out
the AI biomedical control grid backed by Israel
and the deep state. And she also highlights
this, which we will talk about in the
coming upcoming panel, I argue.
Purdue Engineering Launches World's First Center for Internet
of Bodies.
This is brand new. This was published
on the February 20.
Oh, no. This was oh, that's crazy.
Where's the date?
Right there. Oh, wait a minute.
Oh, I'm sorry. You know what? I think
this is not the new this is not
the new this is an older post.
Anyway, the one I I just had the
wrong post. This is about the Internet of
bodies. The point is and one of the
things she shared, I just I'm not gonna
try to find off top of my head
right now. The point was about this and
a new angle of this coming out. But
we've already covered this extensively
when I just covered this thing. Internet of
bio, nano things is upon us. This one
was from Purdue. Internet of bodies is formed
when the Internet of things meets the human
body to transform
it by empowering humans.
And our bodies represents a network of tiny
devices on around or in the human body
comprised of functions like sensing, analytics, communication,
actuation,
powering, and harvesting.
That's where this is going. And her the
point that she's referencing in this is that's
being built out now.
Switching fiscal control to central bankers.
The Doge takeover of treasury payment systems
combined with the purge of the civil service
is designed to end congressional control of fiscal
flows and policies. Now right there, you may
go, good. Congress is corrupt. Well, I agree
congress is corrupt. But that centralizes power in
other people that most argue are also corrupt
or simply part of the same establishment.
Even if you disagree, you're still talking about
a centralized power. That's not what you would
be asking if you believe in any of
the principles they're laying out. Any of them.
And it goes on to say, this leaves
what they're doing right now,
the New York Fed
and global central bankers in complete control of
the fiscal line.
So if you're listening, conservatives, republicans,
is that what you want?
The idea is that we're supposed to be
going away from that control structure. Yes. They
know they were floating and the fed like
they did last time, by the way,
but that's not happening right now. So at
this moment,
what they just did with the takeover of
treasury, with few people controlling that now, leaves
the New York Fed and global central bankers
in complete control of the fiscal line. She
knows what she's talking about more than anybody
in this in this financial field.
As
a particular as a practical matter, she writes,
Musk and his team,
and whatever private companies and foreign governments are
now sharing those data,
have replaced the executive branch
and congress in terms of control and operation
of the fiscal side of government.
Very well articulated. That terrifies me with even
the possibility
that he is being puppeteered by somebody else,
which I've seen more consideration
of that idea than ever today.
Apply it to everybody equally, especially when they're
being tapped and basically controlled in a thousand
different ways by the people we're concerned about.
They have replaced the executive branch in congress
in terms of control and operation of the
fiscal side of the government.
That's just so incredible to me. Social credit
system.
It looks like the Doge takeover of the
systems
is setting up the infrastructure
to start a social credit system
using federal payments.
Hate crime accusations and entrapments are designed to
assist here, and I have a point about
that in a second.
We all see this
happening, right, with the conversation of antisemitism.
It's it's the same objective from a different
flavor.
Crypto push.
The testing of an all digital transaction system
continues using private cryptocurrencies
while a regulatory framework for crypto is being
put in place, and stable coins are being
used to significantly
improve the dollar's ability to dollarize
the emerging markets.
Land grab, one I find incredibly frustrating seeing
as how more than anybody, the very people
not talking about this right now are the
ones calling it out.
Oh, and this is important for the long
picture.
One of the big goals
is to use Bitcoin
as a Ponzi scheme
to swap for real assets
500,000,000,000,000
of land and minerals
as Howard Litnick puts it.
If mandated,
government purchases can run up the price of
Bitcoin,
and then the 2% who own 70%, when
I argue it's actually more consolidation than that,
of Bitcoin can swap their Bitcoin for land
on a secret tax free basis.
They can
achieve m MBT,
the real core of MAGA,
make billionaires
trillionaires.
Think about it.
I mean, what you're saying is very clear.
Just because, you know, the ultimate idea being
the the larger land grab dynamic. We're not
even to the Gaza part yet. It's about
simply using this as a way to sort
of swap what she argues are
not real things for tangible assets.
In one of the largest
land grabs or you know?
What was a better word for it? But
land grab is exactly what it is, but
they're one of the largest transfers of wealth
in human history.
More so than even COVID nineteen. Understand.
Gaza genocide.
To build part of that control grid,
they need to move the Palestinians out to
Jordan and Egypt to continue or continue to
genocide them.
Either way works for their plan.
Either way, it appears they believe they need
Gaza,
and the land, the water, and the oil
that's in the area and the gas to
complete the control grid.
So the Palestinians
need to go.
So think about that in the larger picture.
So if you're all if you are of
the mind that Israel is not our concern,
okay. Fine. I think you're wrong. But realize
that what they're doing there now that Trump
has made that point is absolutely part of
your concern.
And it seems to be the central location
for the new Technate.
Marketing.
A wide variety of ridiculous cultural, and this
is I love this part because this is
what few people have the courage to call
out. A wide variety of ridiculous cultural and
unethical medical schemes have built up hatred to
a fever pitch.
And logically so. Right? She's saying these these
are
understandable reasons to be angry, but this is
the point. They've been done. And I'm of
the mind and I think she's saying the
same, that these have been almost allowed to
be that ridiculous. Whether the woke politics so
that we're so over it, so angry
that we see what we're dealing with now.
70 plus genders, transgender kids, late term abortions,
money laundering, NGOs, destruction of women's sports, to
name a few.
And she goes, doing lots of different actions
to cancel all of those things is so
delighting Trump supporters
that they have failed to notice the shredding
of the constitution
and an illegal coup.
That's what she calls it. This is combined
with cryptocurrency, speculative profits, and massive entertainment pumping
through TV and the Internet.
To further support the coup and inspire the
crowd to despise and or ignore all any
liberal or a person who tries to warn
them that DOJ's access to and the use
of Treasury's payment systems
and other actions underway are massive violations of
the constitution and laws in general.
Right? Well, so for people like us that
are nonpartisan are going, woah. Woah. Woah. Like,
I don't trust any of them, but that's
a problem. And they go, oh, you're just
to support the Democrats.
We all see it.
That's what that this is how this has
been set up.
All you have to do is shadow ban
and deride anyone who suggests that the proper
response is to enforce the law.
The marketing pitch is that past lawlessness justifies
current lawlessness. Isn't that what we're always talking
about? Well, that makes you just the same.
You're just as bad. Canceling all sorts of
heinous, ridiculous, and wasteful expenditures helps promote this,
which, by the way, yes. Nobody would argue
logically that any of these things are should
be allowed. It's like the point is they're
ridiculous and heinous. We all agree they should
go away. But if you can't now see
how these things are being used, I argue
set up in order to be removed to
justify the next step.
I could be wrong, of course, but he
just recognize that e they're using things you
want to go away, in my opinion, to
roll out the problem.
There is little understanding, she says, that where
that cancellation is done illegally,
like we're seeing right now,
the courts will often reverse it.
And it will often cost it will cost
will often be more than the saving. I
think that's by design. She said she continues,
the freedom fighting community is betting big on
RFK Jr and Tulsi Gabbard going into the
administration,
not understanding that they are full on supportive
of the land grab in general in The
United States she's pointing to and the Gaza
genocide, which are the big plays,
which is why this seems to make sense
for them now and why they've all shifted
weirdly into the support. Now saying Iran's Trump's
Iran actions are suddenly good even though she
made a whole point about why they were
illegal. Well, gee, who seems to influence that
exact change?
You know exactly who it is.
The administration has done a great job of
furthering those two picks while muzzling the freedom
fighting community that is hoping to make progress
on health, food, and other selected issues.
The control grid and the land grab will
override any progress made on those fronts, she
says,
unless it is stopped, which it still can
be.
Weather warfare.
This is one of the plunderers,
aces in the hole. The one of the
plunderers, ace in the hole.
Weather warfare will continue to to support the
land grab on an ongoing basis and comes
with the ability to manipulate the media,
old and new, to suppress the death counts.
The takeover of TikTok was necessary for this
purpose.
Now whether or not you agree, I I
find it such a breath of fresh air
that there are people who are willing to
stand back and see this from a nonpartisan
view and just criticize
government taking actions that seem to lessen your
freedom and consolidate power.
Amazing. We have to it's like, why is
that even hard for people to do? Because
people are
choosing teams who are this is an ideologue.
They've they believe in this person,
so they don't want to acknowledge the problems.
That's part of the way this works.
The bottom line, she says,
this is a coup.
Last June, she says
she wrote she said on money and markets
that the leaders of the push for a
totalitarian
control model
and the central bankers had decided to back
Trump
because he could deliver the conservatives into the
model. Couldn't agree more.
Just like I think he was tapped for
the last time.
What is happening now has been in the
planning at least since then.
Trump and Musk are simply Kabuki theater.
She continues, what I underestimated
was the speed at which they would proceed
with a full on coup.
However,
given that the Department of Defense and intelligence
agencies' clouds
have all been digitized
and put into the hands of Silicon Valley,
a complete reengineering
of the US government through the digital systems
is now possible
at high speed.
So as we've been talking about for a
long time, we finally met, you know, the
rubber meets the road dynamic. We are at
the point where now they have technological ability
to do what they've always been talking about
potentially doing. And that's the point she's making
is that's why this is now rapidly rolling
out.
She says, this is a coup.
The goal is to destroy the constitution
once and for all.
Now you may not wanna hear that because
you believe that Trump and Elon have not
done nothing but give you lip service about
how they love the constitution
while taking very deliberate action that goes the
exactly opposite. But they sure as hell keep
screaming that. And so all you wanna hear
is the narrative. Yeah. It's hard to hear
that.
Maybe they don't even know they're doing it.
Sure. I'll give you that bone, but stand
back and look.
Consider
everything she's laying out is very easily provable.
It's verifiable. It's demonstrably happening in front of
you.
You have to see how this is the
opposite of what we would say in any
apolitical sense. Just talking about having an apolitical
conversation about the constitution, you would never say,
yeah. Let one person control all of that.
You know you wouldn't.
It says if they succeed, the central bankers
will will have complete control
as Bank for International Settlements
manager,
general manager, Austin Carstens, has openly described. We
played it many times. He's simply saying that
with this money's pro pro pro, programmable, traceable,
trackable,
and that they can stop people from using
it should they want to, paraphrasing. That's where
we are. That's what they're doing.
She says, my recommendation to all of us
is to bring as much transparency to this
as quickly as possible
and implement whatever is possible in your state
to protect the constitution
and individual sovereignty.
Just absolutely nailed it.
Very important article. Make sure you read this
for yourself.
Now seven seas
as another part to this. Coming off a
just a thought post, which by the way,
where she's working on an article for TLAB
right now.
The Abraham shield plan
is a, quote, strategy proposed by Israel's Coalition
For Regional Security that effectively establishes
a technocratic
transnational
transitional government
in Gaza.
Well, look at that.
Where all cash is abolished.
Sound familiar?
Look at that. The Abraham Shield Plan, a
coalition for regional security, is a new Israeli
political security initiative that paved the way for
the state of Israel to emerge
from wars of attrition
to a reality of security, stability, and prosperity
based on the current regional opportunity.
Says now the historic mission of the state
of Israel is to translate its tremendous military
achievements, of course, if we're pretending that's what's
happening, into a political turning point, one that
will break the Iranian stranglehold so they can't
ever let go of their their agenda, leverage
the current regional opportunity and create a new
regional order,
a new regional order in The Middle East.
Number one, closing the front in Gaza, returning
all hostages, establishing a technocratic
transitional government in Gaza,
and regionally led de Hamasification.
And we'll get to that. Or maybe not
even today. We'll see if we I think
we'll have time. But the point that, you
know, Israel funded Hamas right up until October
7. Let's I can't believe we still can't
honestly have a conversation about that,
which shows you how dishonest it all is.
Cash in the Gaza Strip will be abolished.
Zero cash and an ad an advanced mechanism
of monetary supervision will be implemented.
Maybe a world coin, perhaps.
Maybe some new Tether stable coin. Who knows
which direction they're gonna go?
With crisis comes opportunity.
Right? Never let a good crisis go to
waste. And so don't forget, this isn't the
first time that Israel has been on the
forefront of the technocratic state as AI created
mRNA technology is completely intertwined with this vision.
Pfizer used Israel at its world's first laboratory
to study its COVID vaccines.
See, it's all coming together.
Now we can read about this plan. Very
public, not new. Now seven seas adds they
will be installing the Technate in The Middle
East and putting a digital boot on the
devastation peep devastated people of Gaza. For those
unaware, this is essentially an idea that replaces
all major institutions in the public and private
sector under the control of a Soviet of
tech tech test excuse me. A Soviet
of technicians
as referred to by Thorstein
Veblen over a hundred years ago. That's why
it was Soviet.
Now I'm gonna include this
because it's really important that this show has
a lot on this very point.
But this was on the January 8 year
as Israel's Globalist ambitions become clear,
whether it's that that's greater Israel, but it's
much more than that too. Team sport Republicans
endorsed North American Union.
You know, somebody like a Jones who have
been publicly stating to fight this their entire
career suddenly can't seem to see it.
And look. I mean, these these are exactly
what we this is the sustainable development goals
from the UN. This is a new world
order map. These these and, again, the one
that I don't happen to have actually, let
me see if I can get that tweet
to come up.
There we go. I think that's it.
Nice. That is it. Decentered news again. Make
the American Technate great again. So this is
the Technate of America. Just so happens to
be exactly what Trump has accomplished. Greenland, Canada,
Mexico, Panama. Wow. What an utter coincidence.
You know how hard it would be mathematically
to make that coincidence? I mean, guys, that'd
be that's wildly naive to think that all
just became a coincidence. You could argue Trump
doesn't know what he's doing. That's not hard
for me to wrap my mind around.
But it's clear what's happening.
This is what's happening.
And they're hiding that, I would argue.
Add these for you.
Important to remember where this comes from.
Now here, what we're seeing is the input
the in in they're
implementing what Catherine was talking about
in Gaza as she highlights.
And now we're seeing the rollout of this
basically, a plan. This just like the island
point that Israel had already rolled out under
different name at a different point, and now
we're just watching it play out.
So keep an eye on this because I
think this is what's gonna start to happen.
Now here's YNAB news. Abraham's shield plan is
road map for meeting the regional dynamic after
the war.
02/22/2025.
Look at that. A comprehensive strategy proposed by
Israel's Coalition For Regional Security aims to stabilize
the Middle East through Saudi normalization, Palestinian separation,
and united front against Iran.
So the Abraham Shield plan, guys, is just
the same thing that they have been rolling
out
over and over from different they just they
wanna get rid of the Palestinians. Now, of
course, you could argue from their perspective this
is about just the endgame of their Zionist
racist
colonial project.
But overall, I think there is the element
I mean, they're they're very this is they're
not, like, absent from all the bigger conversation
of what's going on with technocracy or whatever
the other government agenda is. So I think
it's intertwined. I think it's one and the
same. I mean, how do you not see
what's going on in Trump's administration?
So I think this is the roll out.
This is global. This is technocracy. It's happening
in front of us. And now we're watching
I could be wrong about those points. But
we are watching this transition happen in this
government right now. And I don't know how
we could ignore how clear those two points
are.
So what we're seeing is this rolling out,
and they are all on it.
Now let's not forget
Palantir, who's also a central technocratic
artificial intelligence surveillance aspect of Trump's administration,
embedded like a tick in that administration.
This is the Citibank to Obama's administration. This
is that's Trump's right here.
They already are working with Israel for on
the genocide since January twelfth of twenty twenty
four. Alex Karp is adamant about it, openly
threatening people.
This guy is a lunatic.
Peter Thiel, a little more soft spoken, but
just as concerning.
So I want you I don't want you
to miss the obvious genocide that the world
is aware of. They're a central part. They
are training their artificial intelligence. So here's what
I want you to think about in that
concept. Essentially, since the overlap with Pfizer and
the shots and all of that,
is to consider
if they're doing this and they're training, and
we now see them rolling out their $500,000,000,000
AI artificial their AI infrastructure program with Stargate.
We know that Elon Musk, as I said,
was working with the National Reconnaissance Office,
which is, like, the most shadowy element for
the most part that does surveillance even for
the NSA. And he says, you cannot hide
because you're being constantly looked at. He says,
we'll work with Elon Musk to work out
the artificial intelligence. That's what we're seeing.
Your control structure.
And that was under Biden's administration, by the
way. If that doesn't make sense to you,
then you're not paying attention because it's not
about the two parties. Point though is that
they're using
the the genocide to train their artificial intelligence
programs, which by the way is going to
come back to you. That's how this is
gonna work. So I want you to hear
what he just said. Alex Karp.
And also the point being, oh, I thought
I had the oh, I must have accidentally
closed that. Here, I'll grab
oh, I think it might be in the
other part of the show, but just I'll
just grab the lavender since the other one's
there.
Or even just both so you can see
them.
Point being, the first one from nine seven
two magazine was entitled a mass assassination factory.
Inside Israel's calculated bombing of Gaza, that was
the habsura program, an artificial intelligence program.
This one, Lavender, the AI machine directing Israel's
bombing spree in Gaza. Now that was 04/03/2024.
Right? Knowing that they joined 01/12/2024,
I think what happened was they were working
with Abzora,
November Thirtieth Twenty Twenty Three. Now maybe they
were secretly working with them. We didn't know
that. My point I think they were working
with this program. Palantir saw an opportunity to
train their program with the genocide,
jumped over, made a deal with them, and
now here's Lavender. Now we're focusing in on
individual that's what it was.
Now that's my opinion on the process, but
we know they're working on this. And we
know it's a genocide, and the world can
see it. And these people are working with
the current administration.
Now here is what he just said, and
this is absolutely crazy to me. This guy
is sitting at a meeting,
and and there are public investors on the
line, and this is what he says.
Alex, as always, we have a lot of
individual investors on the line. Is there anything
you'd like to say before we end the
call?
We do. We're doing it.
We're doing it, and I'm sure you're enjoying
this as much as I am.
Let's
not talk to analysts about the burden of
being right.
Our burdens of investing in ontology, our burdens
of actually looking at the math, the burden
of of reading, what the rule of 40
is,
the burden of, being honest about what an
enterprise software company is, or the burden of
explaining to your friends that you're really happy.
Maybe we should just start talk stop talking
about it. I'm very happy to have you
along for the journey, and you are partners
for us. Every Palantirian,
we are crushing it.
Everyone else who's listening,
we are dedicating our company. We have dedicated
our company to the service of the West
and The United States Of America, and we're
super proud of the role we play, especially
in places we can't talk about. And we
love our success in The US and globally.
Also, you know, we are doing what in
United Kingdom and many other places Israel. Palantir
is here
to disrupt and make our the institutions we
partner with the very best in the world
and when it's necessary to scare enemies
and, on occasion, kill them. And we hope
you're in favor of that. We hope you're
enjoying being a partner, and we're really happy
and very, very focused on what we're doing.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you. I mean, who says that?
I mean, regardless of whether you're doing you
don't that that that's not see, what my
opinion is that's something that is important for
them to make clear for the like, there
there's a reason that's being stated. In any
normal it's the same point they make about
politicians. Right? Where you know historically, it's that
they'll basically say whatever they need to say.
Principles be damned. Facts be damned. We'll convince
you to vote for me. That's it. That's
how we always have seen that. They're shameless
that way. And it it varies on how
do how you know, some are more just
honest than others. Then all of a sudden
post October 7, we started seeing politicians go
to their own constituents in the halls of
Congress going, we don't care what you think.
You're not you go you go to Hamas.
Go to Gaza. I'm going, woah. Those are
people that might vote for you. So you
either don't care
that you might lose their votes or you're
aware that you don't even need them. Right?
There's a there's a couple ways to see
it. In this case, you're talking about investors
who probably in in any historical context of
business, you don't want them to know they
might have a moral issue. And they might
be like, well, I don't wanna invest in
this because they might, I don't wanna kill
people. Even if you think that that that
business people don't care, the point is you
just don't go in that direction because it's
bad for business. But he comes out and
states that. We sometimes kill people.
I think there's a reason for that, guys.
I think we're not only watching this very
rapid shift in moral
ambiguity,
poor in in more and more ambiguous.
Also, just that it's in the interest of
a foreign government to kinda collapse the impression
of this fake already impression of world based
order. The idea that I think Americans are
largely good people.
That's my opinion. I'm sure people my point
is because, it's it's the only reason I
say that, and I do generally think that
anyway, is that they have always tried to
convince you that they're doing good.
Why would they do that if they thought
we all didn't care? It's because they need
you to think that because I think that's
what we all collectively generally want. So they
pretend to be fighting for freedom and democracy.
I mean, you could disagree. I think the
point though is that this
is trying to shift that for the benefit
of somebody else.
Now here, just by the way, doing well,
actually, let's do this first.
Polly points out, a lot of people don't
understand that Peter Thiel's company, Palantir, also carps,
actually kills people. Like, he was just saying.
I think that's why she's posting this. This
is the point of their technology.
Also, Joe Lonsdale, Alice Karp, are part of
Palantir. Remember those names because they are part
of the TechPro takeover of The United States.
And she points out they're killing people in
Ukraine, they're killing people in Israel, and for
the US army, wherever they want.
It uses Palantir's software to transform how it
uses data
and AI to perform missions and make decisions
make decisions.
So if, hypothetically, Palantir is an extension of
the Israeli overtake of our technology, and now
we're rolling out AI throughout, I mean, can
we at least ask these questions? I mean,
how clearly we can see the Israeli UN
eight two hundred startup dynamic that they proudly
pointed out, and how many of our politicians
are just ignoring any of the risk because
Israel is our ally?
There's clearly been an a a co option
here. They have been taken control of. And
now we're watching these things roll out. I
mean, it's being we this is the the
point of no return here, guys.
And here's what Alex or Peter Thiel, as
you've seen before, said
about Israel when asked because
I think there's an obvious issue here
or places we can't mention. He says, out
of all the things he lists off, we
all know what's going on. It's a public
contract, but he says places we can't mention.
He's means Israel.
And here's how Peter Thiel responds.
So what do you think about the use
of artificial intelligence
or lavender
by the IDF in
identifying
Hamas targets?
And secondly, do you agree with Elon Musk
about that the population decline is a risk
for humanity?
Look, I again, I'm not I'm not,
you know, I
you know, with without without,
going into all of the deep you know,
I'm not on top of all the details
of what's going on in Israel because my
my bias is to defer to Israel. It's
it's it's not for Yeah. That's clear. Us
to to second guess every, everything.
And, I I believe that,
broadly, the IDF
gets to decide, what it wants to do
and that they're broadly in the right. And
that's that's from the perspective
I come back to. And if I if
I fall into the trap of,
arguing you on every detailed point, I'm I'm
actually gonna I would actually be conceding
the the the You would lose and people
would see that you're lying and that's why
the the people like you don't like to
get in point to point because it can
become as transparently clear that you're just simply
repeating Israeli Hasbro talking point. Broader issue that,
the Middle East should be micromanaged from Cambridge.
And I think that's
just simply absurd.
Of course, he would have all lots to
say if it was a group that he
didn't like committing genocide anywhere else. Thomas, I'm
not I'm not gonna concede that point.
And what was your the other?
Obviously. Now the bad quality video here, but
you guys have seen it before. That that
is definitely real.
Now
to overlap this, right, with other the the
obvious issue is clear, I think. I I
mean, you I'm I'm sure people watching might
disagree with what's going on, but all I
ask is that you consider and keep an
eye open for that problem that I hope
I'm wrong about
flushing out in front of you.
But on top of that, what I'm seeing
is like we talked about before, the way
that they're keeping people from looking at it.
The show we just did, under a thin
veneer of fighting left politics, Trump and Musk
play the American people.
I think that's very clear right now.
Now here's Jones saying, Alex Jones predicts a
globalist cyber attack on government payment systems to
be blamed on Musk. That's quite the prediction.
Sorta sounds like you setting up the narrative
for what's about to happen. I mean, how
would you possibly know what they think about
it.
If you go and watch yourself, there is
no evidence as usual. It is predicts
a globalist cyber attack,
okay, on government payment systems. Weird how right
now they're centrally controlling all of that, Almost
as if they're setting something up to be
blamed on somebody or rather to cite them
and make it look as if Musk is
being blamed. I don't know. I'm not gonna
pretend I would know like he's pretending right
now. My point is we should wait to
look for facts. But what's funny to me
is we just talked about this the last
show. I was making the same concern before
I even read more into it today, which
is that okay. Wait a minute. You've got
them a few people with no oversight that
have now taken control of $6,000,000,000,000,
90 5 percent of federal spending. Right?
And even and over the last so many
days, he's been doing the same thing. Democrats
seem to be going after the, you know,
make like, basically, continuing to insinuate that there's
going to be an economic collapse
all of a sudden. And I I pointed
to all like, I think there was three
or four other points that weren't even related
to the treasury part. I'm thinking, well, time
out. All these money
financial moves being done by Musk and Trump,
and you're gonna point outwardly?
I mean, it's certainly possible.
But just like he framed an upcoming false
flag inauguration or the drone 75 different stories
or any number of other false claims that
he put out that we never check him
on.
The point
is, ultimately, if you're already framing this out
as going to be blamed on Musk and
something well, you are setting up that that's
like coming out and saying that if there's
an attack in Syria, we know it's Assad
and chemical weapons. This guy has become the
mainstream media. The right, in many ways, has
become the left today. Fake news, false fire.
You know, what what was the other term?
It's just funny to me. They've they've become
the very thing that they always point out.
You're just simply taking, not this exact hypothetical
guess, but
corporate media. You're literally reporting what the government
says is happening, but because you're framing the
current power structure as the rebel,
the not totally at the current highest level
of power, you just pretend like you could
just slice them. That's you citing the government,
and you are the corporate media.
This is setting this up in my opinion.
My opinion. But watch. We'll see what happens.
If all of a sudden we have some
major financial false flag or rather just financial
thing that happens, and they're like, we told
you.
Well, we we don't know anything yet. All
we had was your narratives. Then now they're
gonna go, it's not Musk because he said
they were planning to blame them based on
literally nothing
but out of thin air.
Greg Reese, who used to work with him,
simply says and I I the word I
don't like the retards really believing this BS
about the deep state being defeated,
it's wild to see.
And this guy says, Alex Jones says we're
winning. Alex is with them. Greg says, clearly.
I just thought that was interesting.
Thirty seconds ago,
they were working. I mean, it was Alex
Jones was trying to make it seem as
if they were on the same side. Clearly,
they do not see this here. He see
what I find telling is how many people
keep falling off of that group
and then go, like, a problem.
Criminal.
Liar.
Right? True stream people.
David Knight. I mean, I've I've got the
clip I played before. There's so many of
them have left and gone, like, that's, you
know, Rickard Richard Grove. The same not honest.
Could just lurching into any story based on
a partisan narrative without any facts to back
it up. Exactly.
Gregory's also says the deep state is not
being defeated.
That's an obvious lie. It is revamping itself.
Out with the old, in with the new.
Now it's his opinion. Right? Just text on
Twitter. Just think about it. Because what we
just showed you, I think, is evidence that
supports that very point.
I don't pretty sure it's not defeating the
deep state when you could literally see some
of the most obvious examples of what at
least I would see as the deep state
being empowered by all of this.
Shannon Joy, same point, says, I don't think
people realize how dangerous Doge is, especially conservative
ink, meaning, like, you know, teams of Republicans.
She goes, they seem to think Trump is
dismantling the government, but he's not. He's consolidating
it and handing extreme power to unelected and,
unaccountable global oligarchs.
Now just because you might think those global
oligarchs or, you know, what she's referencing is
the Musks and the billionaires
are trustworthy or on your side or do
what you like,
same point as before. If you truly believe
in the principles you're laying out, the constitution,
for example, or just like libertarian ideals
or the idea of just
democratic ideals, whatever you think of my point
is none of that aligns with giving consolidated
power to unelected
oligarchs.
It's just amazing how you can convince people
that this is freedom and democracy or whatever
you think when they're doing the exact opposite
in plain daylight.
Now Bob gets it.
Bob Moran says and this is a clip
of Donald Trump.
So and and it's it's a it's a
nice clip just because there's kids. It's it's
friendly.
You know? If you're not, like, desperate to
hate Donald Trump, it's a nice clip. It's
nice to watch. And I and I completely
agree with what he's doing right here. And
and I do say that in tweet. But
this is Alex Phillips saying, giving girls back
their safety, their integrity, their sports.
No. I'm not crying, honestly.
And it is nice. It's just it's only
until I have two minutes. But they gather
around, and he's being really nice and cute
to them, like, you know, tie in there.
It's just it's a cute clip. My point
is that if you don't if you can
put aside your absolute hatred for the person,
which I think is important not to all
you know? I don't I mean, I don't
hate them as personal people. I I hate
I I I even hate using the word
hate honestly.
That just I think they're criminals.
I think all of them are very problematic.
But it's unhealthy to have that kind of
the point is that's the Trump derangement syndrome
that both sides of the paradigm are obsessed
with. They either hate him and they ignore
everything or they love him and ignore everything.
But as Bob says, here's your guy keeping
girls safe.
You know, the same guy who plans on
injecting them all with AI assisted mRNA poisons
ASAP.
So now, when your hearts explode halfway through
a race, at least they won't be overtaken
by a massive hairy man.
And that's what really matters.
Now he's being facetious,
but he's but he's his point is the
same. I guess, I I would argue if
you actually put him to to serious back
and forth, that we both would argue that
this is still a good thing. The I
this is where I think Bob gets it,
that this is being, I argue, allowed
something that's already clearly collapsed for the most
part to be propped up, to be brought
down for this very transition.
Either way, regardless of whether I'm right about
that,
what he did was good.
But the point is, if you're trying to
pretend like he's keeping your kids safe, you
have to look at the full picture here.
I think that's important. So he I agree
with the and my reason I say he
gets it is because I'm seeing a large
transition
of a lot of these things
taking down or going after or attacking woke
politics or just making Democrats look bad in
lieu of the bigger picture.
I think it's everywhere you look right now.
And I said, Bob sees it. We're being
played, and that's no way and that is
in no way suggesting the move was bad.
It's fantastic.
A long overdue, in fact. Both things can
exist simultaneously.
They're using the fight against already collapsing woke
politics to usher in technocracy.
And I linked
to the the show from must and Trump
playing the American people.
This guy this I just thought this was
hilarious. This is I I'll I'll just read
exactly what I said because I'm not sure
if this is a bot or not. He
says, doing other things wrong doesn't mean he
didn't do the right thing in this instance.
I said, okay.
I literally highlighted exactly I said, agreed, especially
since that is exactly what I wrote. I'm
guessing this is either a bot or you
partisans are not even reading before jumping
to write the expected pre prepared partisan response
to what you assume somebody's trying to say.
It's exhausting, quite frankly, literally the point.
I didn't he didn't respond. But, I mean,
think about that. I literally said there's no
way this is not to suggest that it
was bad. It was fantastic. Long overdue. Both
can be simultaneous. And then he literally just
goes it's just funny to me. I what
do you think? I honestly, when leaning towards
the fact that he just looks at this
and says, Bob sees that we're being played,
and it just lurches into the thing because
he assumes that what I'm gonna get at
is what he's other partisans are saying. Nope.
We exist outside the partisan game, and that's
why it's easy to see that you're all
being played, at least in my perspective.
Honestly, guys, that's not some, like, word or
hype or, you know, I think that's most
people today. Like, we're not some elite club
that sees through. I think most people do,
and that's what's important to recognize. And I,
you know, there's I I, of course, could
be wrong.
But I'll always point to the the few
times in the past that I've made those
claims, and I'm pretty sure I've turned out
to be correct. COVID nineteen, Israel, I think
we're obviously there in both cases.
But another example,
this is Chuck Schumer saying, our elected shadow
government is conducting a hostile takeover of the
federal government.
Okay. Well, I don't agree with exactly the
way he's framed that.
But
objectively speaking, we're highlighting the same thing. Right?
That an unelected entity is basically conducting a
coup of the government. Now I'm arguing that
this person, Chuck Schumer, is either very aware
of that and putting this out for exactly
the point I'm making right now, or that
he is just trying to
to stay kind of throw a wrench in
the works because he's of the old guard
and this is the new. But once it
all happens, they're both beyond the same side
anyway.
You could decide. I could be wrong, of
course, but I think the funny point of
this is that that's what's happening.
Like, what you're seeing is a major and
obviously illegitimate
move
even if you think it's for a long
term positive outcome. So what's funny is that
because Chuck Schumer said it, therefore, you can't
even think for half a second that maybe
that's accurate. And then, of course, look.
Alex Soros reposted it. And that's the funny
point of Zero Hedge goes, you gotta be
kidding.
Because that just confirms all of my biases.
Right? Which is so stupid because Alex Soros
retweeted it. It's the same point. It doesn't
mean it's not true. You guys are so
transparently
bi binary.
The Solari Report says that's the problem.
The last government was lawless, so now it's
cool for this government to be lawless. America's
social media promoting the idea that lawlessness is
cool, fashionable.
Abrogating contracts is cool. Genocide is cool. AI
bots teaching that killing people and taking their
land is the latest style, and real men
don't bother with law. She totally gets it.
The killers are drunk the the killers drunk
is on don't drunk is on. Excuse me.
The bottom line is that using
the idea that if Democrats say it, that
the opposite is true and it seems to
work for some people,
doesn't mean it doesn't like, the point could
be that Democrats say it and it could
be the opposite true. But to assume that
is my point.
You can't just blindly go along with the
partisan assumptions. You are going to be misled.
That's how it's applied.
Jason Baster puts a meme out and says,
hey. Look. They're doing the meme again.
An old meme he's put out in the
past. It's called controlled opposition, Jimmy.
Basically, they make one side of the government
so terrible that people flock to the other
side of the government to protect them from
the bad side of the government without realizing
that they're all on the same side. And
then the bigger part is that that flip
flops depending on when they wanna use it.
Jason sees it. It's been around for a
long time.
Now,
obviously
there's a, I mean, an endless amount of
reasons, especially when you stand back and make
it just about the government, as far back
as you wanna look, but just taking this
administration. We're two weeks in, guys, and they've
already put out blatantly,
embarrassingly false information. And I gotta be honest,
the way that this is done, I kinda
think they wanted it. Like, they knew it
would be a lie. I don't I don't
know what the the real objective is in
doing something they know will be called out
for a lie. I could be wrong.
But it's just incredible that anybody is taking
anything at face value or that we're being
told, no. Just slashing this and this program
or USAID fighting here when they keep getting
caught blatantly making things up. And that's obviously
not unique to the left and right now.
That's all of our government. But as you
can in case you forgot, because it's still
being pointed to by Elon Musk, which tells
me that there is an agenda to keeping
it going.
But the the Gaza condom story,
in case you missed it, is spectacularly
false. And not only did Trump reiterate it
in I mean, what is that room again?
I mean, this is an a major
event. People around him,
guards there,
and he speaks the same lie.
And drop site news says, turns out The
United States did send $50,000,000
for STD prevention, which turns out that it
wasn't even condoms in this case.
Just so happens that it was sent to
Gaza in Mozambique,
the country located on the Southeastern Coast Of
Africa.
Hamas in Gaza, Palestine Palestine did not receive
$50,000,000 worth of US condoms from that grant,
like president Trump suggested in this very clip.
Or that Kellyanne, Lee or what is it?
I I'm I'm forgetting her name lately. I
gotta get used to her.
Oh, well. This woman. But it's Kellyanne Leavitt.
Right? Levitt?
The point is obviously that's wrong. And so
she stated it because she was handed a
piece of paper that she dutifully repeated. That's
what her job is. Donald Trump repeated it
because I think that's the agenda, or maybe
he did the same thing. Just like Biden
when the with the babies beheaded point.
Just like Trump just also again did with
Netanyahu standing next to him. Are you starting
to get the synergy here that our US
Presidents just do what they're told by the
Israeli government?
How do you miss this? And the bottom
line is this is about Gaza. It's the
same point, And this was a lie. Now
you can even look down here to one
of the other posts
trying to oh, here it is. Here's the
contract. Nope. Even Twitter says, nope. That's fake.
It's or rather it's the you you're misinterpreting
what it says. And it was for Africa.
And then if you read even further on
this, which we did, it's clear that that's
not even the full picture of what went
even to Africa.
And they just lied about this, guys. Now
look, I'm in no way saying that there
is no misappropriation
of funds or rather that they're using USAID
to do woke politics around the world. But
the bigger picture is that that's all it
means to an end in and of itself
because that is for regime change. So as
we get to the USAID point, don't forget
that it's not about left and right. Just
and, like, even highlighting the idea that USAID
funds predominantly
left leaning pot.
If that's all that you're focused on, I
get why you're being played. You have to
realize that do you think they care about
the politic? They're using that as a as
a Trojan horse for regime change. Now what's
hilarious is that that's now being acknowledged by
the people that are tall calling this out.
But then yet, you can't stand back and
go, oh, but we're gonna pretend that they
were doing it for so they're gonna change
that government to make sure they push
pronouns.
You don't realize how silly you sound? Like,
that that is obviously an agenda. And, yes,
it's been it's overtaken things, and it's important
to highlight.
But just take a look at what they
accomplish. What has been the outcome of these
regime changes? Right? They use the political spectrum
to insert themselves. And and here's the bigger
point.
Many people that are built deployed for those
things do believe they're doing that. So that's
the cover story, and the CIA works through
that to execute regime change for the government
agenda.
When you're back here fixating on the fact
they spent millions of dollars to send wolf
pronouns book studies to some group, Yes. That
is crazy, and, yes, the money shouldn't be
spent, but that's not what they're doing it
for.
I I I would I would say that's
my opinion because that's fair to say, but
I think that's provable.
You can look at what's been going on.
But so back to this point, they lied
to you about Gaza condoms.
Why do you think that is? It's about
framing it as woke politics, DEI, fighting the
Democrats, and lying about it
in order to distract you.
They followed up even and said the Guardian's
report on this. And, of course, the Guardian,
therefore Democrat, therefore we know it's real. That's
the lazy kind of logic we're seeing. I
don't even know if you can call that
logic. It's already very provable that this wasn't
the true story. So The Guardian simply highlights
that. It doesn't make it invalidated. It says
he dunks, debunks Trump's press secretary day one
lie, day one, about US planning to send
$50,000,000
to Gaza for condoms. Not a penny of
the 60,800,000.0
in contraceptive
and condom shipments funded by The US, which
is crazy, by the way. That's even a
thing. But I we all agree with that,
I think.
None of it went to Gaza. In fact,
the accounting shows there were no condoms sent
anywhere in The Middle East. That's my point.
So they took this you know, I I
can my I I'm very convinced about this,
but let me be clear. This is my
opinion.
I think the reason they pointed this out,
they saw a Gaza overlap. They knew it
wasn't for Gaza Hamas. In in in in
actual what they knew was Africa, and I
think some they, for whatever reason, were pressured
to do it or they decided to do
it, and they did it for this reason.
Because this is a really it's a part
of government propaganda from Israel.
Using condoms for kites and and attacking. Let's
not forget. Hamas is funded by Israel right
up until October 7. Okay? So whether or
not that's real or not is for you
to decide. But there has been a propaganda
push to claim they're using these things. Right?
So people like little TikTok were like, oh
my god. We knew it. See, this is
why. And they put it all together. Even
though it wasn't real in the first place.
But we are the media now. Right? Did
you even check? Did you even care to
look? Or did you just blindly take what
the government press secretary said out loud? You
know the answer, guys, but they're the media
now.
K. So the point is that clearly,
there was none sent anywhere. So not only
was it not to Gaza, but it wasn't
even condoms. So they took a story that
just connected to Gaza, Mozambique,
Africa,
and just goes, well, it's contraceptive. Let's just
pretend it's condoms, and then we could claim
it's Gaza, and then it'll overtake the new
cycle. And some people will pretend that's why
because bombs. And then it becomes this whole,
we have to dismantle
the aid structure, and all you're really doing
is consolidating it for Marco Rubio, continuing regime
changes, and hiding what they're doing from now
on.
Seems a little bit simple, doesn't it, when
you really think about it?
But here she
is, smugly pushing the lie that this is
happening because she doesn't know or she does
and doesn't care.
Little TikTok
happily sharing the lie. And by the way,
still right there. No no addendum. No, hey.
I was wrong. Nothing. Because these people are
not interested in informing
you. Shouldn't have to make that clear.
And then here's Musk yesterday.
Now
two points to make here. One, he's still
pushing that lie. But, of course, you could
argue he's just trying to be funny.
And that's the second point is that seems
to be a tactic that's very commonly used
today. Oh, we're just trolling.
Like, we were just trolling about the Greenland
Canada thing, but now it's totally real and
it's all about freedom. But you're are but
maybe tomorrow. No. Yep. We're we're just still
trolling. We tricked you.
Oh oh, is that how that works? It's
a troll until it's literally at your front
door? Or it's it's and they swear
that you got tricked until it happens, then
they'll convince you the very next day that
it was always the plan and you got
tricked by us telling you were tricked.
So you get the point. It's about playing
it in a way that nothing needs everything
and after everything needs nothing, you can lie
up until the point it happens. So people
don't know. They're not sure. So my point
is he comes out with this and says,
this meme goes deep.
And that shows the Iron Dome, my tax
dollars, which by the way, it's funny how
that doesn't be a problem for you. They
were funding an illegitimate thing that doesn't even
work ultimately at the time in order to
pretend that you're always being attacked. No. No.
We're not worried about that one, though. This
one says, somehow also my tax dollars, and
that's Hamas firing rockets.
And this one says,
two gay Hamas terrorists having safe sex. Yet
still somehow my tax dollars.
Yeah. You know exactly what he's clumsily referencing
right there. He wants you through the continuation
of the story even though we're still we're
just joking about it now
that it's part of the story.
42,000,000
views.
You think these people down here are all
aware that that's no. Half of them down
there believe that that's a real story.
That's how it works. Here's another lie. Two
weeks in, guys, and these are only a
few of them, by the way, Doge didn't
fund $600,000,000
in Pentagon spending on sushi. Now the problem
with this is that now people will see
things coming out of Doge and and then
maybe discount them when in other cases they
are real and should be praised.
Now my I don't think any of them
care about any of this.
Now this is a fact check. Yes. But,
of course, as you should know by now,
that's not what I base my work on.
This is simply as a reference point, and
then we can do our own due diligence
to find out the whole truth.
But if your response is to go, oh,
it's a fact check. It's your claim and
disregard. Well, then you're a stupid person. That
that is about you. Like, the point is
always, if you disregard it before looking into
it because it's a fact check, then you're
ridiculous.
Right? Or if you blindly accept it without
looking further, then you're also ridiculous. It's the
way that they keep you.
That's how both the parents a paradigm works.
If you dive into this, it's very clear
it's not. And the point is, if you
thought it was fake right now because USAID
did a fact check, well, guess what? Twitter
also said it was fake,
which, by the way, I think that is
absolutely fantastic. Hold on a second.
That's why I took a screenshot because this
is how Twitter operates today. Okay? Check this
out. I'll see if it's still there. It
doesn't show it right now. Look at that.
Oh, now it's back.
I'm telling you guys, this stuff, just like
Patrick Henneth was showing you, this is applied
selectively, and now it's there. I'm willing to
bet you if you look at this tweet,
probably doesn't show up on my side. That's
why I took a shot of it. Okay.
Here's what it says. Major accounts in Elon's
orbit are sharing demonstrably false claims about Doge.
This is and this is just one of
the many, by the way. It's everywhere. Just
like we've seen over and over on every
partisan story the last year. It says this
one went viral from an Elon parody account.
It's not a joke. So these people are
sharing this based off this guy's video who
apparently either didn't know it was a parody
account or didn't care. And I said, either
same thing. Either those guys are are that
bad at doing due diligence, which, by the
way, should reflect on we are the media
now, or they don't care,
or they are trying to deceive you. Never
a better time to question everything, guys. That's
why I took the screenshot. But here it
is now since it popped back up, and
this is Wall Street Apes, an account that
is let's see.
Almost it's almost 800,000 followers who's clearly engaged
in with Elon and in their in that
inner orbit.
And it says, there are no words to
describe this. Doge has found analyzing US Treasury
payments. 600,000,000
a year on sushi. The IRS spending $230,000,000
on Starbucks cinnamon roast cups. Now I'm only
addressing the the sushi point. I bet you
all of this or at the very least,
just it's questionable at this point. But I'm
willing to bet you they're probably also false.
I mean, I let me see the,
no mention of it in there.
Either way, the point is from a parody
post.
Joke. The claim about Pentagon spending this much
on sushi originated from a parody account. There
is no credible claims in this report. And
do search for yourself as I did.
And it says neither Musk nor any official
Doge communication has made such a claim.
Okay.
Here's what the fake post looks like.
And it's literally and this is how this
works.
It says not Elon Musk. Right? But if
you just get the shit if you're just
looking at it on your feed,
you might not notice that. You might see
the fit the image or, you know, whatever
else. And that or the guy just didn't
care because it got reached. My point is
the,
Wall Street apes of the conversation. Right? That's
what I'm talking about. I thought there was
one more.
The point is you have big accounts like
this that lives at TikTok, the rest of
them that are engaging with this kind of
false information and getting
4,000,000
views.
4,000,000
people
shared this, talked about it. I mean, look
look at the quotes. That's always a good
way to look at it.
What do you think they're gonna say?
Even with the fact check underneath it now.
What does sushi stand for? I'm not sure
what that even means.
Do do the do your own research crowd
really will just read a quote. Oh, good.
See, some people are calling it out. This
is no. That's I know I recognize this
person calling it out.
Did I read that right?
Go through them. You'll see. You know? At
this stage, we really should be filing tax
returns anymore or paying the federal government property
that we should f the IRS.
Taking reaction, taking you know, changing their lives
in direct based on something that's false.
Very important to recognize. Now, again, the point
being this guy shared it. Wall Street apes
pointed to it going, oh my god. Because
no due diligence
or because it's just weren't because you know
it's going to go crazy. And even if
it turned out to be false, they don't
seem to care. It's a profit machine at
this point.
Telling, isn't it?
And it it said this is the post.
Good morning. My experience with Doge has been
totally wild so far. 600,000,000 on sushi. That's
that's all it is, guys. So not only
was it not this is what's hilarious to
me. Not only was it not Elon, but
this was taken from a a post with
nothing.
There's no source material. It's just words, and
it's not even Elon's account. But you got
people getting 4,000,000 views by simply pointing it
to so we knew it. See?
I'm telling you guys, I know there are
honest people out there that just don't see
this stuff. If you're concerned or you happen
to see this or if you have a
friend, share it with them. This is ridiculous
that people are willing to the we are
the media now with millions of followers who
just glean something off the front page of
what they thought was Elon and then make
an entire grandiose post about it, breaking down
every bit of metric.
That's crazy.
Here's another one.
Muhammad Shehada points out in saying how fast
propaganda travels. Now you can't miss how these
things seem to be intertwined with Israel.
You obviously know why right now. And ask
yourself why the America First government seems to
be propagandizing
for one very clear agenda. He says this
cement factory that they're all claiming was a
gift from USAID to Hamas
is in the West Bank.
It's not in Gaza. Never has been. Israel's
been imposing a draconian system called GRM where
every single bag of cement going into Gaza
came in a truck fitted with GPS and
cameras to monitor it.
And he says right here, five second Google
search would have shown you the cement factory
is not in Gaza but the West Bank.
But that doesn't stop these people from posting
about how they've been giving money to Hamas.
Typical.
But as I'll get to in a minute,
you know, who does give money to Hamas?
The the Israeli government, but they're not gonna
call that out. All Republicans are pointing out
every little detail, but not when it comes
to the provable evidence that they are working
with the government that openly funded funded Hamas
right up until October 7.
Here's another one, though.
I meme, therefore I am.
722,000
followers.
It says, did you know that USAID spent
your tax dollars to fund celebrity trips to
Ukraine? I'm willing to bet you they probably
did
in a broad sense based on all the
other nonsense, and it wasn't about woke politics.
It was about
using the whole
caravan to hide some kind of regime change
tactic. Right?
And this is all to boost Zelensky's popularity.
You know, you mean Zelensky that Trump is
still funding weapons and everything, which by the
way, they're all pretending still isn't happening because
they claimed he paused the aid. It's like
it's like defeating
ISIS or leaving Syria. Remember the last administration?
They still swear some people swear that still
happened. Literally, Trump just again said defeated ISIS
next to Netanyahu even though three days before
he bombed ISIS in Somalia.
I mean, now we gotta laugh out loud
about dumb this stuff is. My point though
is that he's still funding them even though
they pretend it's not the case. He sent
and it was a public story. He rerouted
funds through and and and weaponry
through Israel, Poland to Ukraine. And Israel still
funding them right now anyway, which
if you're funding Israel, which they are, then
you're still funding Ukraine. But that's the but
the point here. The point is,
this is a completely made up video.
I mean, therefore, I am. Either knows that
doesn't care or never check-in the first place.
And apparently, e news
is not even it says video has been
fabricated to appear as though it came from
e news, but there's no evidence that e
knows e news ever reported that, which you
can check for yourself.
And then Ben Stiller is one of the
people posting this. He's posted publicly that that's
a lie. Now, of course, I'm not gonna
take Ben Stiller's word or anybody for that
matter, neither should you. But that doesn't mean
you should assume
because he's not a republican that he must
be lying because that's also just as stupid.
Now you can watch this. It's it's a
fake video. It just says, hey. USAID sponsored
American celebrity visits. And it shows Angel
Angelina Jolie, Sean Penn. You know, easy dunks
for people that are already gonna assume that
this is true. Right? And I'm gonna how
about even if it is true? You're still
using a fit you're still making up a
video to make for a clear agenda,
which is what happened here. And none of
them checked any of it or they don't
care. I'm willing to bet you though that
this is all all
hiding something bigger. They both Biden and Trump's
administrations are still allowing to happen through whatever
they're still doing, and this is about trying
to hide that by kind of overtaking that
with this false story. That's what I'm seeing
everywhere right now.
Well, as you can see, even Twitter fact
check said, nope. Not true. And you can
check it for yourself, but it's still getting
4,100,000
views. We are the media now.
Now here's Ben Stiller.
And it was just somebody else. Sydney Powell,
Almost a million views.
Of course, Sydney Powell from Trump's orbit. Right?
This is the attorney from Trump's side. And
she says, here's another one. Digital soldiers, keep
them coming.
Did she check it? Did she even look?
Well, no.
She saw the video, and that's one of
the people in their orbit, so she shared
it without due diligence. Great lawyer, by the
way.
That's wild. And it says it's a lot
of fraud and corruption to pick apart. And
people see her share, and then it's absolute
fact.
You see how this works? There's an ecosystem
here, guys. Also, what's the name of the
people who got the money? USAID's apparently been
one big slush fund. Yeah. Or anything the
left wanted. That's the way they play this.
Even though it's been a slush fund and
regime change engine for all of our government
as far back as you could look. And
it's easy to prove.
Ben Stiller says totally false, untrue. These are
lies coming from Russian media. You see how
that works? Which I think is also stupid.
So these people are so trapped in their
ideological bubbles
that they one guy's project what pointing over
here about whatever he's claiming from Elon Musk.
He's pointing back going, you're Russian media because
you're saying the thing we know is Putin.
They're all stupid. They're all wrong. The bottom
line is they're all trapped in the paradigm.
Either way, the point is you argue that
Ben Stiller's denying it. Of course, he could
still be true and he could be lying
about that. The point, nonetheless, is the video
was made up.
It says, I completely self funded my him
my trip. There was no funding from USAID
and no personal payments. Okay. So here's the
main point. If you're actually honest about this
and you're truly seeking the facts and not
just looking to high five about some partisan
point,
wouldn't you demand that they have evidence to
back that up?
Okay. So the video is fake. Right? Okay.
Well, then let's where's the evidence?
Let's find where the evidence is. Is there
a USAID post that shows he found I
couldn't find it.
So shouldn't we care that I and the
media now are putting out stories that we
and we go, well, I don't see any
evidence that you got called a Democrat shill
because you trust Ben Stiller. I'm not trusting
anybody.
What I'm looking at is, okay. I don't
trust you. I don't trust Ben Stiller. Okay.
Where are the facts? Oh, turns out there
are no facts. All I'm taking is narrative
on one side, narrative on the other. So
what an honest person would do is put
them both down and go, we don't know.
What you're doing is going, no. We do
know because I believe that one side. And
you're calling us the people that are wrong.
Us the black pillars. Us that you see
what I point?
I believe most honest people can see that.
So I'm not trusting Ben Stiller, but what
we recognize is there's nothing. And all we
can do is go Russian media because he's
lost in the same game.
Now in in regard to that post or
the idea of promoting these ideas, which are
fake, Polly simply says he's doing it on
purpose. And this is an important point to
think about because he knows
that the narrative is everything
and that it's easier to plant a narrative
at the right moment
than to correct one.
Thus, he promotes anything which will further his
narrative, even knowingly false information like Visrograd twenty
four in Venezuela or everything else they post
because it works.
Instead of having to correct or deal with
a problem like h one b censorship or
he just, oh, rape,
murder Europe. Make Europe great again. Anything to
get you to look Democrats are bad.
And everybody go and, well, enough people stop
paying attention to how we
childishly
floundered about on Twitter, censoring people that told
him he was wrong, and then tried to
pretend like it was all a cry. Like
like what's happening right now.
Still wasn't a crime. Those are people who
work for the government, but you're still pretending
like there's some investigation
because you have to hide the fact that
you censored people for posting the names of
people that were already public because it's sporting
a spotlight on something you don't want us
looking at. Possibly the technocratic takeover of this
country.
Now here's the important part, though. Insurex and
Barbie
says the richest man in the world,
debatable, obviously. There's arguments about how that's not
true, but of course she takes it at
face value because Elon said,
is working for free in order to stop
your government from robbing you blind.
Instead of complaining,
why don't you just sit down and shut
up and say thank you?
Wow. We are the media now coming out
with some hot hitting news. Trust the plan.
Yeah. That's it. Just be quiet and do
what you're told. Freedom, liberty, democracy, rebels, fight
the deep state, or completely the opposite. But
Insurrection Barbie, with 4,000,000 views and 881,000
followers, her sage advice is to just shut
up and do what the government tells you
because that's fighting the deep state?
I mean, how embarrassing. Right? I mean, guys,
please, these people need to be called out.
But at the end of the day, you're
not gonna see it because this system is
controlling the way it's obvious to me how
this is working.
Now
USAID.
And I might wrap it after the USAID
part because I feel like we I I
wanna go I want this to get seen.
And there's a lot to get to, which
we will get to. I mean, it's just
crazy. I'll try maybe I'll jump to the
end real quick and show you a couple
points about the in the obvious problem of
everybody in the current republican government just meeting
with Netanyahu, handshaking like they're at some kind
of like, they're like they're meeting a superstar.
Like, all smiles and shaking with a with
the largest war criminal on the planet, the
most known, most infamous person alive right now
who should be arrested on-site anywhere, and nobody
seems to care. Not the EU, not yep.
They just let it happen.
But on USAID,
in regard to the fake dismantling of this
as Fiorella Isabelle points out, She says, I
stated from the start. The USAID's, quote, dismantling
is merely a distraction when in reality, it's
being repurposed
and absorbed
to be headed by one of the most
hawkish politicians we've had in congress who is
now our secretary of state. Now don't forget,
that's the very guy that the majority of
the Republicans were telling us would never be
in that position.
Most of them going, that's never gonna happen
because he's the wrong guy. That he that
would be a a,
you know, what they said what that one
person say would be a a violation of
our you know, and here he is. And
then those same people turn to say, here's
why he's the best guy.
That's not the majority of my opinion. Again,
always hear that. I think it's clear that
I most people are just being quiet or
concerned about this. It's my opinion.
The people who are pointing out of the
large accounts we're talking about, the ones that
acted like this was never gonna happen. Oh,
they're just trolling you as we kept her.
Remember? Over and over and over.
And now he's here. Now they tell you
why it's make makes sense. She goes, not
to mention he's surrounded by Zionists and the
aid of one the world's richest tech oligarchs,
backed by the DOD, Pentagon, and Palantir Mafia,
whose main goal is to consolidate power via
the platform he's, quote, bought.
The right is only, quote, waking up to
The USA being a CIA front for covert
empire operations engaged in the destabilization of governments,
The US targets,
because they can just blame Democrats.
Simple.
Realize people like us have been screaming about
the CIA, USAID, any and the national down
for democracy front by part in all administrations
left and right for decades.
Now it's okay and cool and hip because
it's only about one side.
They're okay giving you limited information or the
same old thing. They're right. They're okay if
you're asking questions as long as they know
as long as they keep you asking the
wrong questions. Or rather they they don't care
what answers you find as long as they
know you're asking wrong questions.
And it says same as the spineless dems
only focus on immigration when it's Trump's office.
Right? See, because she's nonpartisan. Right? That's how
that works. Yet few said anything about this
imperialist arm before.
Clearly, the duopoly is a uni party illusion
behind the military intelligence apparatus regardless of the
new face of the empire.
Destiny Resendiz, for example, has been doing threads
on the The USA dynamic for a long
time. You You know, my somebody who's
they put a lot of these people in
that sphere, respect. And rightly so, because I
think she does amazing work. The point, though,
is it's right there. It's always been there,
but it just doesn't get pointed to. How
does that make sense? It's the same thing
we're always talking about.
And it says, these cheering for the reshuffling
of Trump's USA into Rubio's hawkish foreign policy
are cheering for the new phase of the
hegemon.
It's not over. Just look at their actions
via Israel's expansion.
LATAM and threats in the form of tariffs
or interventions
against those defying them, it's a new direction,
but the outcome will be the same.
Covert operations will become overt via the incoming
billionaire tech oligarchy,
All all,
present for Trump's inauguration.
Meanwhile,
as the imploding controlled demolition
of industries coalesce under billionaire hands,
partly what Catherine Osterpitz is highlighting, and the
wash as Washington continues targeting West Asia, Latin
America, and China,
propagandized Americans on hopium and the opportunistic mainstream
media and the new alternative mainstream media will
cheer
that The US is finished. Nothing's more marketable
than the allure of false hope sold to
the thirsty and desperate masses. And while we're
likely
to get an end to the Ukraine war,
which I I actually don't think so based
right now, but it's it could go either
way.
More marketable than the oh, shit. We as
long as we're like we and we'll likely
get into the Ukraine war, it too will
reshuffle into another theater.
All efforts are to isolate and renegotiate
the non aligned, excuse me, axis, and China
will be the key target, especially via isolation.
Has it worked?
It didn't work. But, again, after serious fall,
all bets are off. True progress arises when
we confront reality with honesty
rather than may masking it with temporary solutions
or setting for trivial distractions,
settling in the form of scrap scraps. Only
then can we finally visualize what's to be
done. Buckle up. We're only just beginning.
USAID may be reorganized, absorbed, but the state
department root by the state department, Rubio says.
Now it's evolved more than that since then.
Great analysis by Fiorella.
Here's what he just said.
One of the many I told you so
moments right here that is important to understand
because it's not about being right. It's about
understanding
that it's not the one that many of
us have been telling you we're gonna get
here. And now when it happens, we go,
no. Here's the guy. And they go, no.
That's not true. And then it happens anyway.
Right? So there are people right now arguing
this is gone.
Even, like, Ron Paul was making a statement
about this about how good get rid of
it now onto the next ones. And I'm
like, but wait a minute, man. That's not
even what's happening.
Here's what Rubio just said.
Well, look. I mean, my frustration with USAID
goes back to my time in congress. It's
a completely unresponsive agency.
It's supposed to respond
to
policy directives of the state department, and it
refuses to do so. So the functions of
USAID, there are a lot of functions of
USAID that are going to continue, they're gonna
be part of American foreign policy, but it
has to be aligned with American foreign policy.
I said very clearly
when we when I during my confirmation hearing
that every dollar we spend and every program
we fund,
that pro will be aligned with the national
interest of The United States. And,
USAID has a history of sort of ignoring
that and deciding that there's somehow a global
charity separate from the national interest. These are
taxpayer dollars.
And so
I'm very troubled by these reports that they've
been unwilling to cooperate with people who are
asking simple questions about what does this program
do, who gets the money, who are our
contractors, who's funded. And that sort of level
of insubordination makes it impossible to conduct a
sort of matured serious review that I think
for an a writ large,
should should have. We're spending taxpayer money here.
These are not donor dollars. These are taxpayer
dollars and we owe the American people
the sure the the the assurances that every
dollar we are spending
abroad is being spent on something that furthers
our national interest and so far a lot
of the people that work at USAID have
just simply refused to cooperate. Are you currently
in charge of USAID or do you I'm
the acting director of USAID. I've I've delegated
that authority to someone, but I stay in
touch with him. And again, our goal was
to go in and align our foreign,
aid to the national interest. But if you
go to mission after mission and embassy after
embassy around the world, you will often find
that in many cases, USAID
is involved in programs that run counter
to what we're trying to do in our
national strategy with that country or with that
region. That cannot continue. USAID is not an
independent non governmental entity. It is an entity
that spends taxpayer dollars and it needs to
spend it as the statute says in alignment
with the policy directives that they get from
the secretary of state, the national security council,
and the president.
So you get the point? Not only is
it not going away, it's gonna continue exactly
the way it has. You just don't get
to see it. And, of course, what they're
saying is, no. No. We just wanna make
sure the dollars are spent in a way
that align with what we're trying to accomplish.
What's hilarious about this to me
is they're literally framing what they're all doing
as the justification for the next step. Exactly
what I keep seeing. The reality is he's
saying, these countries are saying they're not even
spending it the way they're supposed to. Well,
guys, that's the way this operation works. You
think when he does this in Iran, they're
gonna spend the money the way Iranians want?
No. It's about regime change. It's about using
the current political spectrum to infiltrate so you
can carry out regime change. They've basically been
public about that.
So what what's crazy is he's pointing to
the countries that he knows they're manipulating
and saying they're upset about this, and then
saying that's why we're gonna use this to
further the goals of American interest, which is
regime change.
So it's it's a very, very thin veneer
of shell game. Like, it's obvious what's happening
here if you understand what this has always
been.
So not only is it not going away,
he's now should we delegate it to someone
we don't get to know, by the way,
which that's we should we should be able
to. That's how this unaccountable we we are
rapidly going in a very dangerous direction. I
think just showing you what it's always been.
But also the fact that you're talking about
the woke politics dynamic. Right? Well, I'm I'm
not disagreeing with the ridiculousness of a lot
of this stuff, but it was a time
when that was being used. It was the
focal point of a lot of the conversation
of the world, wrong I think wrongly so,
what was being done, and then they used
that as a way into these countries.
I still don't argue at the at the
core point. It was about any of that.
It was about, like, he's going to going
forward, use it to get his job done.
And now we use their version of politics
to get in the foot in the door
and force us other people.
Under the probably the guys of walking back
all the woke politics, and it still amounts
to the same outcome.
Infiltrating these countries,
destabilizing if necessary, spying on them if needed,
and regime change when called for. That's what
this thing does. And so it's infuriating
for us that I'm calling this out for
somebody like him, a regime change monster, to
step in here and act like they're gonna
revitalize this or rather, excuse me, you know,
change it in any meaningful way if if
even, you know, and the guys are removing
it entirely, which is not even on the
table right now.
Here's another clip. Speaking with Fox News,
here's what he says.
Head of USAID.
The head of Doge, Elon Musk, called USAID
a criminal organization and added that it is
time for it to die.
Despite being funded by it in many different
ways. That's the truth. Up and and that's
up until last year, by the way. Do
you agree with that? They have basically evolved
into an agency that believes that they're not
even a US government agency,
unelected power structure CIA done. Well, I think
what they're doing is trying to make you
hear that and think, oh, deep state, we
see it.
So he's he's giving you an insight into
what they all know it is in order
to get you to jump on the name
so they can roll away the USAID
boilerplate front
and then just continue doing what they're doing
through the state department, which is basically the
point is what it's always been.
So when they even doing that is making
you think something's changing when all they're doing
is showing you the way it's truly operated,
which has been a regime change engine. They
are global charity that they take the taxpayer
money, and they spend it as a global
charity
irrespective of whether it is in the national
interest or not in the national interest. One
of the most common complaints you will get
if you go to embassies around the world
from state department officials and ambassadors and the
like is USAID
is not only not cooperative,
they undermine the work that we're doing. And
Right. So what I get that to be,
sort of like you said the other clip,
is that we that that is the USAID
employees, like the ones that called out Samantha
Power. Going like, I don't know if we
can't keep doing this. We're helping the no.
We're not helping people like we should. And
I I kinda laugh. Not it was sad
because that shows you that there are good
people that work at these places. They believe
they're doing right. Now I'm not talking about
woke politics or just you know, you gotta
pull yourself out of that always assumptive partisan
lens. The point being that there are people
in these groups that just go over. They
think they're, you know, helping people in impoverished
areas or whatever.
And in some cases, they are bringing food
or whatever else, but it's only a means
to an end. As we it's an objective
reality.
They're using these things to initiate all sorts
of intelligence operations. And I argue, I think
you can easily prove it, that Israel has
used it in the same way, which I
think is part of what he's highlighting. But
what he's doing there is pointing to those
individuals
and saying
they're they're upset because it wasn't even going
the way it was supposed to. Because they're
the on the guys that it's about helping
people, and they go, wait a minute. We're
not even doing this properly.
And now just gonna use that to make
you think they're gonna shift it and ultimately
do the same damn thing without even those
people involved. Just straight up regime change tactics.
Which, hey. Like we talked about Trump in
the past, maybe that's a positive at the
end of the day. At least we get
to see it right on the surface that
they're doing what they say they're not doing.
Either way, if you think for one second
that this I mean, how is it the
conversation in the converse and on Twitter that
it's USAID is gone? How is that even
possible?
Right here on Fox News. That country. They
are supporting programs that upset the host government
for whom we're trying to work with on
a broader scale and so forth. So they're
completely unresponsive. They just don't consider that they
work for The US. They just think they're
a global entity and that their master is
the globe and not The United States. And
that's not what the statute says, and that's
not sustainable. Can it be reformed, or does
it need So that gives you the impression
that we're fighting some global
deep state. You know, like, that that's why
people are going weed and realize
the only thing you're getting is a narrative
from a guy who is
a part of everything we're talking about.
Like, the most I mean, the the the
Republicans push back on when they thought he
wasn't gonna be there. It's only a troll.
So do we know that? Like, I'm I'm
I'm I'm the mind that this is definitely
how it operates, and that's how they all
use it.
But just simply pointing and gesturing towards that
idea
is enough to get people to think that
we're dismantling everything and find the deep state.
It's pretty simple.
All I want is people to just wait
for facts, wait for real outcome,
not just words for politicians. Somebody already made
that point about Gaza. I think I'll get
to you in the next show
where they're going like like, I made the
point about what they're doing with Gaza, you
know, with the occupation. And she and she
goes, they've already
completely taken away on right out from under
them.
And I'm going, lady, they they nothing's even
happened yet. He made words out loud. Maybe
that's what'll happen, but how can you argue
that we know the outcome already? Because you've
chosen to believe it. And and tomorrow, that's
like saying, ISIS defeated. We're out of Syria.
Just because he briefly
alluded to those two things. And not even
before he started saying it publicly. I'm talking
about last administration. That's what keeps happening. And
I get it. I get it. We want
to believe in people, but you can't let
it circumvent your logic. Need to die. Well,
that was always the goal was to reform
it. But now we have rank insubordination.
Now we have basically an active effort to
where their basic attitude is, we don't work
for anyone. We work for ourselves. No agency
of government can tell us what to do.
So the president made me the acting administrator.
I've delegated that power to someone who's there
full time. And Why don't we get this
name? Why that's twice now. I find that
interesting. We're gonna go through the same process
at USAID as we're going through now at
the state department. I think there are some
this is not about getting rid of foreign
aid. There are things that we do through
US
USAID that we should continue to do. That
makes Right.
So it's not ending. In case you missed
that already.
This regime change engine continues.
All they're doing is getting rid of the
woke nonsense that nobody cares about. Right? See
how that works? We're shaving off all the
BS that was only there to keep you
angry, and we're continuing the real agenda, which
is what it's always been for, which allows
a lot of them to pretend like we
won and it's over. Sort of like when
Trump got elected last time when they were
like, we did it. The world's changed forever.
We're gonna win. And then it just oh,
wait. Democrats won again.
It's just I don't know how we keep
playing this game.
Sad thing is, guys, this will not stop.
And how much you wanna bet the person
that we're not hearing
probably has some overwhelming connection to a foreign
government?
Sense. And we'll have to decide, is that
better through the state department, or is that
better through something, you know, a reformed USAID?
That's the process we're working through. There are
things that are happening at USAID that we
should not be involved in funding. That and
or that Like all of it. Like every
single part of it. Right?
Like, I mean, it's it's crazy to me.
So we just got done hearing from Republicans
how this whole thing should go away. Right?
They just keep to and I agree with
you, actually.
And I kept telling you, it's not going
away. And you kept telling me I was
a liar. Well, here we are. We're still
here. Now are you gonna jump back over
and go, okay. Well, then then you're wrong,
Trump and moo Rubio. The whole thing should
go away. Why don't we hear that since
you were just making that point? I think
we all know why. The reality is, and
to be honest, it's going, well, it's still
the same point. It's not partisan. All of
it should go away. Why are we sending
foreign aid to anybody when we're $30,000,000,000,000
in debt?
Anybody. Especially a government that doesn't need it
that's also committing a genocide, which is really
the only point of this.
You know what this is. You it's transparent
if you're being honest with yourself. We have
a lot of questions about, but they're completely
uncooperative. So we had no choice but to
take dramatic steps to bring this thing under
control. Do you think that we're And then
when they restructure it like he's saying, I
I wonder if that becomes some sort of,
you know, APAC ADL monster dynamic.
Of course, these are my worries. Right? But
is anybody confused about who these people are?
Their entire history of blindly supporting Israel at
all cost to America?
Now don't forget this. I thought this was
relevant since we just recently pointed to it,
and you also won't be able to find
it if you try to search for it
under Trump's account,
which is totally a coincidence even though it
happens every time with Musk and Trump or
the CIA post. They're just not there when
you search for it. I'm I'm sure that's
just a complete coincidence. Right? But this is
from 02/2015,
August third October 13. Sheldon Adelson is looking
to give big dollars to Rubio because he
feels he can mold him into his perfect
little puppet. I agree.
Now remember, Sheldon is the late husband to
Miriam Adelson, still the same Sheld Adelson
oligarch Israeli oligarch influencing nature,
which we now remember. If you forgot, Miriam
Adelson
gave Trump over $200,000,000
at this point for specifically West Bank annexation.
Exactly what her ex was telling you. Her
condition, the illegal thing. The illegal thing he
agreed to. Just like he agreed to the
fake deal that's now ending. It's obvious, guys.
They're all telling you these things out loud
if you listen.
So the point,
I said, shouldn't this matter right now?
Seeing as how Trump is also now an
Adelson puppet?
And now that Rubio is secretary of state,
And especially since Netanyahu was the first call
for one of them, the first meeting for
another?
And since the West Bank is on fire
right now? Gee. You'd think these things might
be relevant.
Pretty interesting.
Is Rubio puppet? Was Adelson bribing him? Or
none of those things matter now that you're
all on the same side?
Partisan politics.
Well, Elon Musk does his typical wow just
to get it 26,000,000
views because it's something he likes, even though
Ted Cruz is a complete moron and like
all the rest of them, completely bought off
and influenced for obviously un American ideas. He
says USAID secretly poured unaccountable
hundreds of millions of dollars toward Hamas,
including tens of millions of cash they never
account for.
Throughout the Biden administration, of course, that's what
it's all about. Even though this goes back
well before, as always,
they know the money they were pouring into
Gaza would benefit Hamas. They did it anyway.
Well,
do you know who else did that?
I'm sure you know where I'm going. So
you're saying Benjamin Netanyahu deliberately boosted Hamas to
try to prevent a Palestinian state? Yeah. Sure.
He deliberately
and systematically
even even told this on record.
Whoever wants to avoid
the threat
of a two state solution
has to support my policy of paying protection
money to the Hamas. So what we did,
with the permission of our prime minister is
to
let
Qatar
to transfer
a huge amount of money in cash,
probably more than
$1,400,000,000.
By doing it, we increase the power of
Hamas. We
did everything in order to make sure that
Hamas will go on controlling Gaza,
and Palestinian authority
will control the West Bank so they will
fight each other.
Netanyahu maintains the Qatar money was to avoid
a humanitarian
catastrophe.
Having helped to build up Hamas, Netanyahu has
now vowed to destroy it.
He fed the beast, and it exploded in
our face. If you base your national security
strategy
solely on force,
then you need to win twenty four seven
forever.
Sorry. I'm just posting this
since
I had it thought I had a second,
but here, just all all I was doing.
For those that haven't seen that. Right? Of
course, the game at the at the last
point was important as well.
Is that clearly you're not fund you're you
cannot send money
for aid in a place that doesn't have
it. There's a reason that aid gets trucked
in
by the ton
because it's not there. Right? So if you're
gonna pretend that he gives suitcases full of
billions of dollars, even though his for the
former prime minister and former head of Shin
Bet in that video admit to you that
they did it because
to they wanna separate. They wanna keep them
divided so they don't accept the two state
solution.
Right? The point is you don't give them
billions in cash for some for aid. You
gave it to bribe them. And what do
they use it for? Weapons. And that's the
point.
Here's Elon Musk. Wow.
Wow. They did the Kufan Hamas. Right? Oh,
it's okay. What about this one? Wow. So
did Israel. Did you care about that? That's
been public for a long time. Or so
did both administrations as far back as you
wanna look, or both part partisan sides.
It's just so infuriating. Well, don't forget, Harrat's
covered this October 9. Anyone who wants to
thwart the establishment of Palestinian state, what they
always pretended they wanted,
has to support funding and transferring money to
Hamas. That's part of our strategy.
That was out on October 9 from a
leading Israeli platform, and the entire Western apparatus
still goes, la la la la la. We
don't what are you talking about? That's fake
news. You're racist.
Or that they continue to fund them because
Mossad went to Qatar and said, please continue
funding them in 2020. And the evidence goes
right up until October 7, guys. It's transparent.
Now that doesn't ignore the point about funding
anything, including Hamas. Right? That's that's the overarching
thing. But realize, if you're gonna understand why
they were doing that
and realize that's in Israel's interest, you'll realize
quickly that it's not a partisan thing.
It's simple. That's how all this stuff works.
Now, Blakely here highlights something else that's been
going around, which is one of the points
that all of these Republican focused, only one
side of the conversation, we are the media
now are completely choosing to ignore,
which is that it's not just about well,
really, there's two points. That it's not just
left and right, but also that they're ignoring
all of the USAID funding that goes to
Israel, which Rubio just told you is totally
not gonna stop.
But see, we're gonna selectively ignore that because,
objectively, that would meet the same criteria that
you're outraged about over here. But you know
you're not supposed to be mad at Israel,
so you just pretend it's not there.
We are the media now. Now it says
reminder that you can't have your student debt
canceled or you yeah. You can't have your
student debt canceled or college paid for because
we need to pay for Israel's health care
and college.
This is cultural husbandry. Tel Aviv University received
$581,000,000
in taxpayer dollars and spent 441,000,000
on salaries and employee benefits.
That's how that works.
And this is a pretty public story. Israeli
Tel Aviv University receives millions in funding. This
is from this is a new report from,
this is February 7. This is from today.
It's going around. Crashing rates over US tax
dollars funding. Not all this stuff is very
public. The point is people are just choosing
to not point it and highlight it out
or point it out and highlight it on
Twitter because of exactly what you're already thinking.
Here's at a bigger store, a bigger overlook,
you know,
larger
what am I looking for? High higher elevation
view. He says, USAID funded funneled hundreds of
millions to universities in Tel Aviv while American
students drowned in debt just to get an
education. Now it doesn't have to be about
while this.
It matters. Right? Because you can show that
Americans are dealing you know, that that should
go to Americans. But the point is simply
that if we're gonna be mad about funneling
money outside this country through USAID,
are are we only mad that they were
doing it because of woke politics? Is that
really the only thing you care about? Or
are you worried about money being spent? That's
the guise of it all. And then you
just get happy about it.
Same point.
Not to overwhelm on it, that you're being
trapped in this logic.
And this is I'm a go through the
actual page. You can look at this stuff
for yourself. But this is this is just
him sharing this this point. As well as
the larger point,
USAID funneled $14,900,000,000
into Israel related projects.
Meanwhile, Americans are juggling multiple jobs. You know,
same point. But 14,900,000,000.0.
This is something that is easily identifiable. The
money that went into a list of all
off. You can look this all up for
yourself, and I'm gonna go into these actual
pages about some of these points in a
minute. The overarching point though is that a
lot of this money went for
I mean, realistically, you could even argue the
same kind of woke politics that are happening
inside of Israel.
But that doesn't matter though, because we're not
gonna call that part of it out.
Cat Turd here says, after seeing
the ex now exposed USAID scam, which by
the way, what he means is one, like,
torn corner of a page that only focuses
on the woke side of one part of
one administration.
Really exposed, which is very easy to see.
He says, I'm thoroughly convinced the Democrat party
is pure evil.
I just said, do you really think your
audience is this stupid?
The last Trump administration
used USAID for numerous failed regime change efforts,
and USAID funds media on all sides of
the false paradigm.
But don't let the facts get in the
way, or don't ruin your partisan grift.
It's effing insane that this is working on
anybody.
Just to give you those points, again, I
mean, I've gone over this stuff extensively over
the years. But just to give you the
points, you could look for it for yourself.
Syria.
Leaked documents now show the propaganda Syrian Emergency
Task Force, the SETF,
organization was financed by the CIA. Proxy, USAID.
And who else was involved in the Syrian
regime change? Right. Left and right. Trump's administration.
But it's not just about Trump, guys. That's
the point is that's what's being ignored right
now. So don't hear it as it's all
about it's about highlighting the fact that it's
a bipartisan, just your government,
funding whatever they need. And part of that
agenda was to get woke agendas flooded throughout
the conversation for whatever reason. I'm arguing it's
because bringing them down drives them this next
point.
Hundred and $53,000
from USAID. You can read about it for
yourself. Dave David Miller pointing out the same
thing.
Here is Bolivia. We've talked about a lot.
This is this is back in 02/2013. He's
saying this, but remember, he got regime changed
under Trump. Former president Bolivia, Ivan Morales, he
says, we have decided to expel USAID from
Bolivia. Remember they used to say that that
was proof they were terrorists. Right? And what
did I say? No. It's because they recognized
those regime change tactics.
Never again USAID who manipulate and use our
leaders without handouts.
Well, okay. This goes well back throughout multiple
left, right, right, same point.
This was silence reigns on The US backed
coup against Eva Morales. Look. Twenty twenty.
And we talked about this at the time.
Leaked audio and this is interesting because it
overlaps even with Rubio. Leaked audio recordings, 2019.
Implicate Cruz Mendez, who's now arrested and charged
with crimes for taking money from a foreign
government. Surprise, surprise. Egypt, by the way, which
is we're talking about Israel, guys. That's what
the point is. And Rubio in Bolivia Coup.
No leaked audio recordings implicate both of them
in the coup in Bolivia.
And now Rubio is in charge of USAID.
Fantastic. Right?
Also, I thought this was important to include.
I think this was pretty prescient, and I'm
still
I like that I saw this. This was
2018.
What is it? We look at the title.
Bolivia's impending US, quote, liberation.
Called it. Nailed it. And this is because
I saw Mike Pompeo
giving that that's how transparently evil this guy
is. So even Morales sits down and reads
out
everything the US government is doing.
I mean, like, anybody with a brain is,
like, that's exactly what's happening. I mean, it's
fun to it's fundamental. These things are obvious.
These things half these things are their policy.
Let me just name it something different. He
reads it out.
Scathing review of what the US government's doing
in the world. Mike Pompeo is going, oh,
you're done. You're gonna be regime changed. I
mean, that I that's my opinion, but look
at what happened. And then immediately, we saw
this ramp up, and all of a sudden,
a military junta gets put in power, and
they go, democracy.
The OAS goes, no. That was fake. And
then allows a military control, and they stop
screaming about democracy.
And and now look. These people are gone.
The peep I mean, it's it's just funny
how rapidly and it was all about, I
think, immediate reasons.
Either way, the point is the same. That
was Donald Trump's administration, and USAID was used
to do it.
He knows that, guys. They all know it.
It's not a secret.
Guaido. How about Guaido? Now again, here are
the point that this is about all of
them, not just Trump. My point is that's
the side that's being ignored right now.
USAID paid Guaido almost a million hundred million
dollars to attempt to climb a fence. Now
that's just one highlighting it. The point is
this is a bigger story. USAID gave millions
to Guaido
and preferred NGOs
in a global scandal.
This was all through Trump's administration,
and that was a spectacular
failure. That's one of those things that had
they succeeded or caused more of a con
that that would have been an ongoing war.
Just because it didn't happen doesn't mean he's
not responsible for all those things. Same with
Iran.
She points out the Venezuela point, and this
is from the voice of America. Trump Administration
to triple democracy aid to Venezuela.
Twenty Nineteen.
That's USAID.
USAID.
Much of the aid was done during Trump's
own administration.
That's the point. So that's that's what she's
highlighting is this guy. This is how this
keeps working, guys.
$98,000,000
from USAID to the trash can.
So the point in highlighting this right now
is to go is to insinuate without saying
and just that's Democrats.
Right? Because that's the that's the schtick right
now. If we see USA, that's Democrats funding
world politics. Well, it wasn't though.
Trump was the one funding this, and that's
what she says. Because it was the truth.
The majority of that aid, much of the
aid was done during Trump's own administration. At
the very least, the point is he'd used
it, so you can't make it about one
thing. And he says,
in fact, VOA, CIA media, put out Trump
tripled the aid as she pointed out to
$52,000,000.
They're not those not asking themselves why Trump
and company woke up and decided to oppose
the very agency they've also been using aren't
bright.
It's true. And she said, I don't play
their partisan games, and this isn't a partisan
issue. It's a problem embedded in the core
of our intel apparatus, cosplaying as a government.
While it's hilarious to watch the mainstream media
cry about it, it's entirely distracting from the
fact that this will continue under other facets.
Well said.
And the point
is not just that they've used it, but
right I mean, the people in their current
inner structure,
like Elon Musk.
Before we get there, this is about Nicaragua.
Like, you probably forgot about most of these
guys, but this was also during Trump's administration.
We wrote about this. We covered it. This
forensic look at USAID's activities in Nicaragua by
Benjamin Norton makes it plain. The country's right
wing opposition was created and managed by the
US government. That's Trump. That's USAID.
So what this is?
Here it
is. This 02/2015. This one's 02/2016.
K? You see, this is the overlap from
left to right. It doesn't stop. The Nicaraguan
opposition leader double dipped USAID money using it
not only to fund her
foundation, but also to pay her family and
herself.
And here's their article about it, which is
2021. But as it says, the US government
has spent years cultivating
a right wing media outlets in Nicaragua that
played a central role in the two thousand
eighteen
coup attempt.
This network is now being investigated by the
Nicaraguan government on allegations of money laundering. That
that's Trump, guys. So 02/2016,
funds through USAID,
and in 02/2018, '2 years later, attempted to
overthrow the government.
There's no way you could pretend that they
just wasn't aware of that, guys. It was
a public conversation. Yes. USAID was publicly part
of it.
Now here's this is interesting to me. Now
we'll get into this point, which is very
easy to show
as usual for. Here's what a congressperson has
to say about it,
and I don't agree with most of what
he says. In his mind, USAID
is this great agency saving lives around the
world. And even if you think that's part
of what they do, it's, in my opinion,
a transparent cover that's not even a maj
not even close to the majority of what
they actually do. That's my opinion. Look into
it for yourself.
But what he says here is that Elon
Musk got money
for his company, which he did, guys. It's
not hard. It's very easy to show. But
what's funny is that because this guy says
this and he's a Democrat and he's talking
about well, I mean, I don't even
who knows? I'm not even familiar with this
guy is. I'm that's see, shouldn't assume anything.
The point is that he's saying this and
he's critical of Musk, which the only reason
I would say this is because I I'm
seeing very tribal action right now. But either
way, a a government person, whether left or
right, he'd be a rhino in their minds
if he was, saying that he is the
bad guy. And this is a great thing.
So because he starts naming it as the
right thing and that we shouldn't have gotten
rid of all the woke politics, then they
would go with then he's lying about Musk.
But the truth is he's not.
So the only reason I'm showing this is
because you have to realize that whether it's
corporate media
or a person you don't like or democrat
or republican, depending on what side you're on,
it doesn't automatically mean it's false. And you
must realize that they know that that's the
way a lot of people think, and they
use that against you. And mister Musk accusations
appalling.
I know they're factually baseless
and frankly, I find them despicable.
It's also curious
because in 2022,
his company, Starlink received millions of dollars
from USAID
for Starlink's operation in Ukraine.
Not to mention the incredible amount of taxpayer
subsidies that helped Tesla become the major company
that it is.
And mister mister Musk, he's a billionaire as
we know. He has no reluctance to take
taxpayer funds from USAID.
None. He took money from USAID.
It was a good organization
when the money was coming from it to
him to help us in Ukraine,
But now he's calling it the criminal organization.
And I doubt that he knows
what 99%
of USAID employees do or the positive impact
they have on the lives of people around
the world and on US national
security, the obligation all of us have as
members of the United States Senate.
I wonder if he's ever met or has
ever spoken to anyone who works at any
of the 60 overseas missions
or seen with his own eyes what USAID
does in countries like Indonesia,
Ethiopia,
Haiti, Mozambique,
Ghana, or Guatemala, just to name a few.
If you just take a quick glance at
in at most of the countries listed, you'll
find very easy information that shows what a
absolute chaotic outcome we've seen. Not because of
the thing they point to and the books
they gave or the food they provide, but
the reality being that when you actually realize
that through that active effort,
the CIA effectively destabilized their country and flooded
their schools with it. That's the reality.
And so look at Haiti, for example. Sure.
Here's some food they gave, but what what's
the reality? When's the last time they had
an election? Aren't you guys the ones that
screaming about anything? That's not even the right
kind of election? But over here in Haiti,
we don't even care?
How does that make sense? It's because they
got what they want from it. Haiti is
where they like it right now. We don't
want we like the fact that we get
what we want, so we're not gonna call
out elections.
That's the reality of the outcome there, and
that's not hard to see. Maybe he doesn't
even know that. Doesn't matter to me. Where
the lives of count countless people really do
benefit
from USAID.
I would I would agree with that. Doesn't
mean that's the majority of what happens or
that's the most important point.
And being billionaires,
president Trump and Elon Musk may not be
aware
that fully
1,000,000,000
people in the world
live
on less than a dollar a day.
Why is that Americans' responsibility when we are
in a position where we're I mean, like,
objectively financially
insolvent? Like, $30,000,000,000,000
in debt is ridiculous.
The idea that we just keep putting that
off and keep funding Israel's wars, like, it
should stop entirely. Even for people that that
are in need around the world. As sad
as that may sound, the reality of my
opinion is that just because that's become necessary,
the idea is that it's ultimately a destabilizing
factor on these foreign on these countries that
keep people in a state of need. They
need that.
Overall,
it's not Americans' tactile
responsibility to do what our government claims needs
to be done, especially when you realize that
that's not even what they're really doing it
for. I think these are transparent today. Now
that's not shouldn't be that contentious of a
point. It's basically fiscal responsibility at this point,
which show they show they don't care about.
They may not be aware that the lives
of hundreds of millions of people, especially children,
are threatened by diseases that can be prevented
or cured with drugs and that cost only
a few pennies.
Or maybe mister Musk is not aware that
the life of every American is threatened by
the spread of infectious diseases. We saw that
with COVID, and there's other diseases
out there where
what we do
elsewhere
protects the health and safety of people right
here at home.
Well, obviously, you know, he's pushing the general
idea,
and maybe he believes it.
But the truth of it all is that
this is something that is you know, there's
there's levels of of of truth to it,
but the main picture right? This is how
you this is the objective reality. There's nuance
to everything. It's not all democrat deep state
game, which has become like the Jones, Benny
all these people are just like this cartoonish
version of the even themselves today,
Or that it's all positive. That's also stupid,
guys. It's it's the point is that there
are people that think they're doing good that
do good because they don't understand what they
work for, I would argue. But the clear
picture is that you can map this back
as many people have. This is a sit
an entity that should be
disbanded,
removed entirely,
which I'll get to in a second.
But the on the second point is that
Elon Musk is a hypocrite as he takes
money from these two. Here is an article
from 2022.
Well before this conversation, the US government reportedly
paid to send Starlink terminals to Ukraine.
Right? So not only that, but the funding
through that to benefit his company, but goes
right up until last year. USAID spent $1,000,000
on Elon's Musk's Starlink terminals in the last
year. That's 02/03/2025.
And, look, there's plenty more you could find
that overlap with companies he's attached to. It's
just crazy how dishonest all this is, and
most of the Republican media doesn't wanna even
touch on it.
David Eich char responded to Charlie Kirk where
he says, unbelievable.
USAID appears to have fuddled US taxpayer dollars
to Soros aligned causes,
per senator Eric
Schmidt. Yet another reason USAID must go, except
that's not what's happening, though. You see how
they frame the narrative that that is what's
happening? But they know it's not, guys. The
Kirks of the world are not stupid, not
in the ways you might think. They they're
pushing the narrative as they watch Rubio on
Fox News telling you it's not going away
because that's what the game is.
I think I don't know how that's easy
and hard to miss. But David Icke nails
it and says your hero Trump has appointed
a long time Soros operative, Scott Bissent. We
already talked about this. As treasury secretary and
you cheered.
It's okay when we do it. Right? It's
the same as the BlackRock point. Is it
a if it's a problem, it's a problem.
It shouldn't be a problem only when it
applies to the side you don't like. Are
Soros aligned?
How about a guy who literally is in
existence because of Soros? Got the founding the
background for his his company from Soros. And
just because you wanna pretend like that was
a long time ago. No. No. You can
clearly prove that goes right up until pretty
recently. Whitney Whitney made a whole thing about
it.
Hypocrisy
everywhere you look.
Al Jones puts this out, and I think
it's all about distraction. Same point. As we're
just laid out a countless amount of misinformation
that he's never addressed or the idea that
we're being misled on a fraction of a
story that I guarantee he knows the picture
of. But he goes, Doge investigation
confirms.
And why why is that? Why they confer
oh, because he said so.
Look it up for yourself.
Didn't confirm anything.
Me Elon Musk shouts out loud through Doge
that they they confirm a CIA ran multiple
coup attempts against president Trump's first administration using
US aid. Oh, okay. So knowing that we're
all you're being buried in what you're lying
about and that people are seeing through it,
you lob out another Democrat bad narrative
with nothing to back it up through the
Alex Jones propaganda show, which is that we
know the CIA through USAID, which is still
a nonpartisan
game,
okay, use that money to attempt to overthrow
Trump. Okay. I'd love to see the breakdown
of that. Now if there's anything, I'm willing
to bet you it boils out I looked.
Boils out to some,
you know, this money went to a group
that doesn't like Trump, and we know they're
trying to overthrow or something abstract like that
that's not definitive. Like, claiming the deep state's
on the run. When what are you pointing
at? Where's your evidence? Is it because you
think the Democrats are upset or what corporate
media is yelling about Trump? That's how we
know the Democrats that's crazy.
It's not journalism, guys. That's straight up propaganda.
The point though is that the CIA, they're
claiming, ran multiple coup attempts, which didn't happen
or you can't prove.
Okay. Well, isn't Trump the one that literally
just said
the CIA must get involved now before it's
too late?
So are we playing the same game that
the only the part of the CIA that
you claim are the ones that you like?
So nothing's actually going away. We're just molding
it into the new thing. Yeah. Just like
we said.
Not some reduction of anything, not fighting any
deep state, just the molding of the same
problems in a way that make you feel
like the Republicans get what they want.
But then we stand back and go, wait.
Where's that reduction of of government agencies we
talked about? Where's that slashing of funds we
talked about? Here's a billion dollars we saved.
No. No. You gave a billion in Netanyahu
right afterward, and then you spent $500,000,000,000
on it. So we didn't save any money,
really. Maybe that'll come,
but it's all narrative right now.
But see, if he's gonna scream about the
CIA red because they claimed,
well, people will jump on it. It's easy.
Five, six million views.
Baseless whole cloth claims. That's how this works.
Well,
Tim Pool jumped in the conversation, which I
think is hilarious and says, wow, isn't the
fifth. Why how White House just nuked Paul
Politico.
We're talking about political right now. Weird ass
taxpayer funded subscriptions.
He says the Department of Energy has $400,000
subscriptions for a 72 people for one year.
Now I I think this is crazy. Well,
what's funny to me
is I said, of all people commenting on
this, this is priceless.
You realize he just got exposed for basically
something similar. For for being funded through some
government shell company dynamic, they wanna blame on
Russia. At this point, I feel like we're
dealing with all the same thing. The funny
thing is that for him to do this
seems very contrived to be like, oh, that's
crazy. They did that thing that I see
just got caught for. He's right over there.
I mean, it's point is here's the right
side, there's the left side. We're all being
played. But I think the interesting story about
this is that it's crazy to me. Right?
That in any context we had what what's
for those of us that are nonpartisan first,
how long have we been telling you that
the government is straight up funding media?
Forever.
And then what do we get told even
by half the Republicans that, well, you know,
the mainstream part of it.
The
pushback.
The reality is it's not just left, but
the the point is that the the the
USAID
or other elements because let's not pretend, like,
that's the only thing. So maybe USAID is
focused on mostly left because there's other elements,
which there are, but there's also right leaning
elements in USAD. I'll go USAID. I'll go
over some in a second.
But the point is clearly they're influencing. So
that's that's not just state media. That's government
controlled outcomes,
which is what they're using this for around
the world. We've shown you this. Flooding,
funding to and we've even done entire shows
in this in the past, and one of
them was during Trump's administration, and I'll show
you that. Remember when they talked about funding
independent media in other countries? That was during
Trump's administration as well as Biden's. The point
was the funding continued on both. And what
are they doing? The same thing. Setting up
fake media organizations to manipulate countries. Right now,
all you're hearing is about is the left
doing this around the world. It's the same
thing.
Venezuela, we just showed you guys, multiple regime
change, and they involve the same tactics everywhere
you look. And have been going on for
decades usually to key to build the narrative.
Iran, by the way, is one of the
main ones. Whether USAID or other groups,
they need to keep doing that. And and
they're largely beginning to push back like we
saw with the Morales.
Get rid of these groups because they know
what they are, so they find new ones.
But I think it's funny that, of all
people, Tim Pool would comment on this. But
before we get into the bigger part of
it oh, well, yes. The the first part
was that
influencing media with government money, which we know,
despite lying and going Russia does that and
Iran does that. No. You do it too.
Both sides of it.
But then from, you know, a partisan angle.
Like, so Politico being funded as a left
leaning platform.
And, oh, let's well, I'm gonna get into
what they're claiming the story is because we're
nonpartisan
and objective reporters, and we'll give you all
sides of the story, not just what we
believe or what we're supposed to show you.
So I just wanna point out before we
get into what they're claiming is the reality
from CNN and Politico is that the no
matter how this played out, subscriptions is what
they're claiming from just government agencies, which by
the way is logical, and I'll show you
why. I still don't think it matters.
I think it's quite obvious that you have
hundreds of thousands. I mean, I announced to
a lot more than that. Millions.
Coming from the government.
Whether it's for government agencies' access to your
I mean, guys, that's the same damn thing.
The fact is they could choose to do
that or not, and that becomes a coercive
tool. So are we really gonna pretend like
any group, political especially, has not been influenced,
tapped on the shoulder when it was necessary,
or just absolutely made to do? I think
we all know that's true, or at least
very likely.
So just that out of the way. Like,
the point is I am not for one
second pretending like this is some right wing
lie. I mean, I think think there's a
level of how they're using this, but the
truth is, it's all of them in my
opinion. But Politico is very clearly one of
them that got plucked out of this,
which makes you wonder why, but nonetheless is
still very clear. But what I'm gonna point
out is how it's interesting it becomes, we
absolutely know that Politico was being funded by
this thing even though that's not actually the
truth of it. I like like I said
first, I still argue that however it really
is playing out, it amounts to the same
thing.
But it should matter to you that they're
kind of jumping to conclusions for their own
partisan agenda. And my bigger point is because
I think we all know that it's not
partisan
at the end of the day. But
let's get into what CNN and Politico want
you to believe, and then we'll go over
some of the actual, you know, both sides
of this.
So this is February 5. White House says
it will cancel $8,000,000 in Politico subscriptions,
8,000,000 in total, after a false right wing
conspiracy theory spreads. Now that's also a very,
very dishonest big surprise for CNN. Way to
frame that, seeing as how it's there's only
one part of it that's like a a
fault a conspiracy theory or false story.
And that's the idea that
that this that basically because of the White
House stopping this, that it had an immediate
effect on on them being, like, funded through
USAID, which even that, it's like that's I'll
I'll I'll read it for you. You can
see it for yourself.
They're they're they're oh, of course. I lost
the here it is. You'll see for yourself
that really what it's about is this this
dis dis disputing the part of whether it's
a subscription
for their service versus them just, like, funding
the media in the most blatant way because
that's, you know, influencing the outcome.
So even if, like, Politico, for example, doesn't
think that, you could still argue that that's
what the government thought it was doing. Right?
I mean, there's all sorts of ways to
look at it. But it says, leave it.
And let me know in the chat. Is
it is it leave it or live it?
I don't know how you would tell me
another chat. Give give it your best shot.
So the White House spokesperson says, she elevated
a bogus claim, and this is what CNN
is saying,
spreading and by the way, for those listening,
this is on the way back machine rather
than the archive for I didn't support CNN.
On social media, their claim they're spreading on
social media is that Politico and Associated Press,
which that I find more interesting, and I'll
show you why in a second, for years
received millions of dollars
from the USAID
department
or USAID, which president Trump and Elon Musk
had targeted by placing staff on leave.
In reality,
this is their claim, the payments
leave it. The payments
represented the whole of the federal government's subscriptions
to the news outlet services.
All federal agencies combined spent 8,200,000.0
last year on political pro according to USspending.com.
USA spending Com. Okay. That's pretty interesting. Now
I would I would argue that even the
political pro, like, that came about because we
started to watch these mainstream
platforms kind of implode
because people were not buying their narratives anymore.
Right? And so I think a lot of
it went to this kind of subscription model
and show it. And then I think this
is how they got subsidized by the government.
I very much do think that.
What's interesting first, though, are the Associated Press
overlap and it'll address the subscriptions part of
it. Now let's remember, political is its own
thing. That's a separate point. But Associated Press,
it really is like the central like, remember
we talked about I might even be able
to pull that up. The propaganda multiplier?
Let's see. Not right there.
Didn't pop up. I think I have I
can search for it on the website. But
so basically,
it's a it's an interesting video that we
shared about what they call the propaganda multiply.
Oh, wait. Maybe this is it. Yeah. That's
right. It was from the Swiss policy research.
There you go. Perfect. I'll just conclude this.
So here, I did I did a post
on this. But it's called the propaganda multiplier.
And what it shows you, this picture right
here, this is all you need to see.
Read it for yourself, though. It gets you
details. But the point is you at the
top and this has shifted slightly since then.
You've got the White House,
CIA,
and the Pentagon.
Now they put out information. Now some of
this also you could argue comes from whatever
reports they may have on the ground, but
it's still the same influence level.
And then AP,
Associated Press, the French
the French press agency or AFP. That's it's
weird that it's it's the French press agency
or Reuters
are are the global news agencies right there.
And there's others as well, but those become
the main people that pump out, like, large
generalized reports.
And a lot of these groups,
Fox News, Times, WatchMo, all these end up,
in many cases, just regurgitating exactly what they
say, half the time not even citing AP,
and they don't even care, which is interesting.
And so it's like this they can prop
again to multiplier. My point though is that
AP, you would absolutely argue that they can
these major platforms
or rather the, you know, the government ultimately
might have a subscription
to this. Not these entities, but maybe like
a a group out there that is their
job is to keep, you know, whatever. Because
it is exact whether it's because it's news
or because it's they're getting their marching orders
from the other parts of the government. Either
way, I'm just simply pointing out it kind
of logically makes sense that you might have
some kind of a subscription. I still argue
that you should not and we shouldn't allow
that. Why we're ever allowing the government through
any abstract way to just dump money in
groups, which very clearly can influence what they
do, that shouldn't be allowed. That's not what
I'm saying. But nonetheless, you can get why
there might be a subscription model, was all
I'm pointing out.
But the reason I'm even saying that is
because I don't see how Politico in any
way fits into that point. Politico is another
platform versus these. The Politico is in this
part of the of the section.
For those in the podcast, it's the third
section down where it goes from Pentagon, then
it goes from the AP part, then it
goes down to, like, the Washington Post, the
epoxy, CNN. That's where Politico is. So it
seems like an odd point. Right? But I
just wanted to point that out.
Back to this.
So the idea being that they're simply saying
subscriptions
for Politico and AP. Now it says, but
as reporters quickly pointed out in response to
false statements on social media, the payments are
not exclusively USAID funds.
But that does matter, doesn't it? So these
are the kind of things I'm getting at.
And a larger point, this becomes this broad
funny. Somebody just put gave me a point
about this. Broad brush
versus broad stroke.
I think broad brush is the typical statement,
but broad stroke is something that I say
that I think obviously makes sense. A broad
stroke of a brush is the same general
point. I just what I prefer. But anyway,
the point is the same. Broad stroke, broad
brush, like up being subjectively
broad about something
we usually means, you know, you're being obtuse.
Is it but the point is that reporting
out there is just kinda going
all this or all that. And the reality
is it's not even all USAID. So that's
see, it's those things get lost in the
conversation. Facts matter. But it says, I look
at these contracts and I have my own
fact. Fun fact.
Byron Tao, an investigator reporter at AP said,
he says, this is occurring because agencies,
not just USAID,
are buying subscriptions to Politico's pro editorial product,
not because Politico is getting grants for other
federal funding. Now that actually seems to be
somewhat true. Doesn't change what I said in
the beginning. I still find it to be
wildly dishonest about the way this works out,
but it turns out to just be one
aspect that's USAID.
The rest of the $8,000,000
is all other groups and their agencies that
are applying for subscriptions.
But I would still argue from a centralized
top down level that can be just the
White House using those subscription elements for their
agencies to influence what they say. But isn't
it interesting that it becomes USAID did all
of this, and that's what we and I'll
show you where it comes from. The, you
know, same grouping, the John Betty Johnson's and
the Kyle Becker that are sharing
what appears to be their assumptive
effort on this.
And it turns out to be only one
part of it, which then shows that they
assume, which is interesting. Well, it says the
Trump administration's focus on the false narrative that
political received USAID funds, which is new. That's
not very false, follows an erroneous claim by
Kyle Becker, a conservative political commentator on Wednesday,
which I look into, not because they said
so. In an x thread, Becker tied a
Tuesday report
from this from Semaphore that showed political staffers
hadn't been paid. That was the very first
thing we saw over a, quote, technical error,
they said, that was subsequently fixed
to a USAspending.com
page
that shows Politico received $8,200,000
across 237
transactions.
Okay. But so what's interesting is they appear
to be back to funding them.
So it's certainly possible they lied about a
technical glitch and then found them the fourth
source of funding, even through the government.
Or and this is the point.
They basically jump to conclusions, which wouldn't change
the idea that the government is using an
abstract form of funding these platforms. I'm not
denying that. But I find it very important,
and you should too, that you have people
like this
who simply have an ongoing USA building narrative
that they're all lying about in many different
ways.
Becomes nest it comes it you get your
clicks and shares,
and all of a sudden, you get another
a separate report that comes out and goes,
Politico hasn't gotten paid.
And they go, oh, it's because and they
and they look up the spending, and they
find one thing for USAID
to Politico, which is not all of the
$8,000,000.
And they go, this is what happened.
They USAID got shut down, and all of
a sudden, they can't pay their people. We
knew it.
But in some way, there is a point
to make there. I agree with that. But
isn't it interesting that it becomes this I
argue they never proved that.
You could just show that the government had
a subscription to this platform, and you know
my point. I already said it. But just
think about how loose that is for people
that are we are the media now.
And it says Becker attempted to tie the
tact technical error reported to USAID funds, claiming
the funds had been fueling political's premium subscriptions.
In thread, Becker also claimed that the Associated
Press have received millions of taxpayer dollars for
years. Becker's post quickly caught the attention of
far right media personalities, including Bennie Johnson, Charlie
Kirk, Dana Loesch, and a ladder a a
ladder of others,
a ladder of whom called for protests outside
political offices. In a Twitter post, William Sommer,
a media reporter at the Washington Post, pointed
out that Johnson, who helped buoy the false
theory,
ironically, received secret illegal payments from the Russian
government. Now
that's not how I would frame that story,
but what they're referencing
is the same point I made about Tim
Pool.
The what was it called? The, what's the
name of the group?
Was that is that group that what's her
name? Chen and then you know, it turned
out to be the same dynamic. So that's
the bigger point about this. You have to
realize that where it's I don't believe that's
a Russian dynamic. I I I think that
is the same thing we're seeing is entities
and power structures that are controlling the outcome
of media in many ways where they not
a may not have them be aware of
it.
So all we're doing here is pull plucking
out one part of an ecosystem
and and pretending to bring it down, but
not really bring it down. Just simply consolidating
power to the people that you want to
use it for going forward.
And meanwhile, that's 1% of a larger ecosystem.
It's so easy to trick people that really
don't care if they're being tricked.
And it says Musk, who oversees the Department
of Government Efficiency, also chimed in on Becker's
post, calling the alleged payments a huge waste
of taxpayer money.
Right. So you see, he doesn't say, I
know this is true. He simply saw a
post, didn't check it, knew it worked for
what they're trying to say, and said, huge
waste, which then becomes in people's minds that
he knows it's true, we know it's true,
and then cemented forever,
even though you never actually checked anything. Politico's
leaders,
in a memo to staff Wednesday, denied the
media company has received the funds from the
government. Politico has never been a but beneficiary
of government programs or subsidies, it claims. Not
1¢ ever in eighteen years.
The media company acknowledged government agencies subscribe to
its services just like corporations do. And we're
gonna get to it next. I'll show you
one of the pet spending pages.
But so the interesting part is if you're
a Kyle Becker or a Bennet Johnson, the
rest of the ones that that made this
kind of jumping conclusion,
and they're saying that's not true, it's subscriptions,
here we can prove it, and it's only
one part of it, the rest aren't even
USAID,
Would you expect them to come back around
and go, woah. Woah. Woah. Here's why I'm
still correct, or here's why that's not true.
Even though it is true, though,
you can look for yourself.
So it becomes, well, so okay. Only a
part of that money went to them. Okay.
Well, then you're wrong in the general claim
you made to begin with.
That matters even if the larger point is
somewhat true. These people don't care about this
is my point.
And so I would argue that you're if
you're an objective nonpartisan
journalist that you would want to be correct.
And if the claims come out, then you
would go back and say, well, here's what
I here's why they're making this up.
But you don't get that. You get largely
partisan pot dog piles about why we know
when you're anyone says otherwise, you're wrong. And
it says in a statement, the AP said
that the the federal government has long been
an AP customer through both Democratic and Republican
administrations. And that's the other point.
You can show that. You can show that
these subscriptions have gone back through Trump's administration
and through any others before that.
So why doesn't that matter right now?
Why is it only about Biden's administration like
the world started at 2021?
It didn't, obviously. It licenses AP's nonpartisan journalism,
which is not nonpartisan at all, just like
thousands of news outlets and customers around the
world. It's quite common for governments to have
contracts with news organizations for their content.
I don't like that at all. I don't
think that's the I don't think that should
be the case.
But that's what they're claiming.
Now here is Will Sommer, who they're referencing,
making the argument here about why this is
not real. And then we'll go into somebody
who is pointing out that or at least
claiming that this was the other side of
it. But the point is right wing media,
he says, belting down today, over the erroneous
idea
that Politico is secretly funded by USAID.
Here's the backstory
as he frames it.
Politico misspell miss missed payroll. This was
on the fourth because of a tech issue.
That's what they claim.
I would know I don't know why you
would take that at face value. In any
case,
MAGA supporters took that as proof that Politico
was secretly bankrolled by USAID whose programs have
been suspended by Trump.
They seized on USspending.gov
pages showing the entire US gov paid Politico
eight point two million last year. Now that's
one screenshot that they I think I have
it right here or somewhere right here. Right?
Where you get that and you get I
mean, there's no there's no link. It's just
a this is going around. That's how this
works. You this is Twitter files for you.
That's what they've done. Handicap these people in
their in their critical thinking.
The point is as you look into the
full picture, it's much more nuanced than saying
they got an $8.2.8 $200,000
grant, which is how everyone's framing this, including
the ones
that were the that began the push of
the story.
If you look at it, you'll find that
only as they said, I can you could
see for yourself. There's only there's it's nuance.
There's multiple entities.
One only one of which is USAID.
And it says that money appears to be
for Politico Pro subscriptions,
which is that's not that's technically what is
stated, but I'm not gonna argue that means
anything other than the government get it finding
ways to get money in the hands of
journalists.
But it says, which cost thousand dollars a
year. Nonetheless, lots of MAGA personalities still mad.
And so my point, that that's this guy,
I argue, is just choosing to take that
narrative as opposed to the other. I find
that to be just as problematic.
But see, it says Bennie Bennie Johnson points
this out. That's one of the earlier points
in this.
Now we learn a news company which spent
the last ten years I mean, he's making
all kind of assumptive points just because he
knows it'll get mass reach.
Rob
Smith.
Dana Lewis. The same point.
Okay.
Now this guy signing Brian Krasenstein doing the
same kind of thing. No. It got ProLogo
Pro. Got paid. You're a liar. You know,
just this guy just these these people are
career taking the narrative against the other side.
That's just what they do.
We should make they're all worthy of ridicule.
This person, Krasian, says USAID funded Politico.
New York Times and AP might sound reasonable
because they provide special services. Now it's it's
all I said is logical,
because it
is. Still doesn't change the fact that you
could use that logic to fund journalists. But
it says, but all of them are left
leaning. Now that's a very good point. Right?
So if you're gonna stand back and try
you know, it still wouldn't then jump to
conclusions like they did, but you're gonna go,
well, it's pretty conspicuous
that this funding for subscriptions
just so happens to go in one direction.
Now I would argue that's because from my
nonpartisan view that I think your government's all
one thing because that was the the teeter
tottering effect. That's where they were in that
moment. If you go back before that, you
can see that it was doing something different.
As we've seen, if you look at the
gray zone, they've hired looked this for a
long time around the funding of right wing
entities around the world.
But the point here is that was the
game in this point.
And he says no funding found for media
on the right
in this context. I I guarantee this is
about 02/2021
forward. It says the concern is government is
being or even 02/2016
is being informed by biased media.
That is true. And media is incentivized to
stay biased. Absolutely.
That is important to hear. That's why I
think outside of the politics of all of
it, this is still an important part of
the story.
It's just I just think it's nonpartisan.
And here's again, let's point it out. Betty
Johnson.
Just gotta break it all down. You know?
And, again, I think this is pretty assumptive.
You can read it for yourself. Did you
know that USAID funded six? Now that this
is well, I'll I'll show you WikiLeaks making
this point.
600 to over 6,000 journalists, seven hundred seven
news outlets, 30 different countries. The thing they
don't wanna break down for you is that
spans multiple administrations left and right and goes
back a long way and has been done
all the way through Trump's administration, but you
won't hear that in Bennie Johnson's breakdown.
Here's Elon Musk sharing a screenshot of Trump
posting on Trump's social with typos and all.
It says, looks like billions of dollars have
been stolen
at USAID
and other agencies.
Much of it going to the fake news
media
as a payoff for creating good story. You
see my point that you can't that's not
provable things to say.
And, also, it's not, you know, going for
this for that. Like, I would argue I
agree with that you're influencing media. But for
Trump to state this as a fact, it's
not
accurate.
Going to make sure this happened. And then
it says and it only and for good
stories about the Democrats.
It's only about framing this as a left
wing attack, which makes everybody believe it because
that's fun. And it says the left wing
rag known as Politico seems to have received
$8,000,000
See the point? But that's not all from
USAID. Right? That's only a part of it.
The rest are from other entities. And it
says, did the New York Times receive money?
Who else did? This could be the biggest
scandal of them all. I mean, look. Even
if it's a % what they say, that
they got $8,000,000
directly from the government for propaganda, that would
be peanuts in regard to even what's currently
going on in the world. Secondarily, it would
be pretty small in comparison to what we
know this government has done even just in
Biden's administration.
So my point the point is they're making
this into some it is it's an important
story.
But for people like us that have been
screaming that they were influencing media for a
long time, it's like, okay. Glad you're catching
up. And it's not partisan. But my point
is for them to make it, well, the
biggest story of all. That's what they they've
all been doing that because they want you
only focused on this.
It says the biggest
of them all, perhaps the biggest in history.
Really?
You mean, like, aside from what I mean,
how do you I mean, literally, anything else
you could name seems to be a lot
larger than what we're talking about. It says
the Democrats can't hide from this one, and
that's the point of it all.
Oh, here's Liz Wheeler.
Same this, you know, adding to the story.
It's not just this. They were paid this
much from all kinds of yeah. Exactly.
It's not 8,000,000. The the point is it's
not 8,000,000 from USAID at all. It's only
part of that.
But this might be relevant as well, guys,
just in just in case you wanted to
ask yourself why the current Zionist administration of
Trump decided to make a bigger point about
this one focal point out of all that
we could point at. Maybe this is why.
Just a thought to add to the conversation.
Asal Rod says, wasn't expecting this from Politico.
When's this?
Oh, look at that. 01/10/2025.
Just like last month
before all this went crazy. Here's what it
says. Wasn't expecting this from Politico, but this
is the best this is the best headline
I've seen for the new Lancet study. If
you're going to report on the massive death
toll in Gaza, you should mention who is
killing Palestinians. Well, look at this.
Israel has killed more than peep more peep
many more people in Gaza than reported, top
stats health study says.
So realize, guys, that's a month ago.
Well before the conversation about this, and if
we're gonna pretend that this is political taking
money from the government, well, at that point
in time, that would be Trump's government. Secondarily,
if we're gonna pretend it's holdover from Biden,
are we still pretending Biden wasn't aggressively supporting
the genocide? They called the genocide jail for
crying out loud. Both sides did. Now you're
gonna pretend like he was supporting them because
it works for your narrative? Look. The the
bottom line is political came out and made
a really big statement about Israel, and a
month later,
they're the focus of a big scandal.
I think that's worth pointing out.
Now Merck says to those who just can't
comprehend why USAID is currently being exposed,
here is USAID funding left wing communist media.
Lazy.
Lazy, lazy, lazy. And gives you the screenshot.
Okay?
Well, here
is part of it. Specifically,
Department of Interior.
Where is this one down here? Okay. So
my highlighting went away. Making sure I didn't
miss anything.
Right here. So this is the new contract
e and e subscription. So that was one
of the main things just to show you.
At least that's what it's stating, and it's
not some hidden point. They're simply making it
out to be a subscription
for a government agency.
Right? And so realize that's not USAID.
That was the point that I need. The
only just to highlight the fact that there's
a million dollars, which I still think is
outrageous,
going from a government agency,
operation of the National Park System, you know,
in order to fund this specifically for Politico.
That's all I wanna point out. K? And
that was after Trump's administration.
So it's not just USAID, USAID,
and it was for they're claiming for subscriptions
just to make sure you saw that cemented.
Now here's another one.
Oh, and and oh, that's right. I will
include this just so you can look through
for that overarching point that you'll that you
can go through here and look for yourself
and realize how many of these exist, which
is crazy,
but then only a fraction are gonna be
for what they're claiming it is even though
the the story is all of it USAID
because that's tied up like a neat little
bow. And half the people showing this story
don't even care to check,
and the other half follow them. So it
seems like it's happening right now. So Arnab
Batrand highlights this important story, and this is
the re this is the big picture, guys.
As we said before, here's the WikiLeaks.
USAID,
and this is from February 6,
was funding over 6,200
journalists across 707
media outlets and 279
media NGOs,
including nine out of 10 media outlets in
Ukraine. Now if you're really gonna stand back
and not read this for yourself and pretend
that this is only left leaning anything, while
you're funding extremist, like, extremist right wing elements
in the world,
You're just being willfully stupid. It's willful ignorance
because it works for the narrative. And this
is what's funny is here's WikiLeaks making that
point. And if you look at the rest
of them, they're just giving you the the
the headline
while framing it in a way that makes
you assume it's all left leaning media because
we're fighting the communist left leaning media deep
state.
Because that's how simple this is for some
people.
No. That's not what's happening. And let's not
forget, this goes back through multiple like, even
if you think it's only left wing media,
then explain for me why this existed in
full during Trump's last administration.
So either you wanna believe he supported left
wing propaganda or you'll pretend it was some
Democrat holdout that he wasn't able to see,
which is just lazy assumption,
or you recognize that it's none of those
things and it's always been used for all
of them.
Arnabah Tran says, bit by bit, we're discovering
that much of The US's aid money was
spent on paying thousands of journalists to gaslight
the world into thinking US was actually helping
and to manufacture consent against US adversaries.
On brand,
but pathetically sad.
And this is the thing, guys. People like
us have been screaming about this
through Bush's administration, through Obama's administration, through all
of them, because that's what's been going on.
So So that's why it's really infuriating for
this to come out in such a partisan
hard corner way. Like, they're just completely ignoring
the facts.
That's very easy to see.
Matt Kennard points out Ukraine again and realize,
again, the point is that Donald Trump is
going is continuing it, at least right now.
He just made a point even after saying
he was pausing this to send more weapons
to Ukraine, and so is Israel.
So he goes, this is wild. 90% of
Ukraine's media and this is just wild as
a nonpartisan point that is crazy.
If you're really pretending Ukraine is a partisan
thing, guys, I mean, you're just not the
facts are very obvious.
It's largely an Israel thing, but it says
90%
of Ukraine media is funded by the CIA
cutout USAID.
And then he says, I assume the other
10% is probably covered by the CIA cutout,
national down for democracy.
Washington has saturated propaganda control of an entire
country of 40,000,000 people. And I will bet
you anything is far more than just one
place.
I think we know that. But the saturation,
90% that you can prove is USAID.
I mean, that's why this country this country
has been complete like, guys, that's the future
of where everything else is going.
This is the kind of vassal, the occupied,
like, ghost state that exists because of his
US foreign policy.
It's wild, and it's very clearly not partisan.
Now as this is what Thomas Massie put
out,
I just corresponded with representative Greg,
Stubey's
bill to abolish
USAID.
Not pretend to and give it to Rubio,
but actually abolish it. Massey continued to be
show show himself, at least, to be saying
the things that I agree with in most
cases. He says, USAID sends billions of American
tax dollars overseas when it spends at home.
It subsidizes subscriptions to left leaning outlets like
Politico and USAID.
Now I'd argue it's not as simple as
that part of it, but clearly,
end USAID. Hundred percent agree.
Absolutely.
But I said,
however, anyone paying attention already knows this is
not what the Trump administration
is doing or actually wants.
What Massey is proposing is what real change
would look like.
Hopefully, you can notice the difference right now.
Everyone's saying, oh, you're black pills. You won't
just give him benefit, give the praise when
he deserved it. No. If he came out
and actually abolished USAID
and actually did it, not just said it,
I would be going absolutely. Like I've said,
like his bill around the women's sports or,
excuse me, his executive order because that's how
our government runs now.
Great thing. Period. Long overdue. End of story.
Now the point we're making is that while
he's doing that, he's also allowing kids like
that to take mRNA shots. That should matter,
but they're separate conversations. The point is that's
still a good thing.
End of story.
This would be good if they were actually
ending it, which they're not. That's why they've
convinced the population to say they're ending it
because that's what they want you to think.
Real change
is obvious,
but I think that's ins it's infuriating.
And here's Rubio again saying that now I've
taken over and we're gonna use it for
US agendas around the world. Exactly the same
thing, but minus the woke politics. So we
won. Right? We're winning?
Well, here are a few examples, and it's
endless. If you wanna look through this, you
can lose yourself in this website.
So this is just simply about showing
couple different points. The main one is that
USAID was funding exactly these kind of things
during Trump's administration. And if that doesn't matter
to you, then I don't know what we're
talking about. So this,
see, 02/1819.
K? That's $24,000,
4 thousand, 4 hundred thousand. John, just averaging
$4,401,000,
3 hundred 90 7 thousand. Alright? So that's
every year
of his administration. He sent about $400,000
for economic support
fund
appropriations, and it's oh, it's up here.
Support program to provide technical and administrative support
for two international collaborative research programs, the Middle
East Regional
Program and The US Israel Cooperative Development Research.
Gee. I wonder why you sent that.
Right? About $2,000,000,000
over his entire administration on top of everything
else, including the 38,000,000,000 billion that was going
over ten years from Obama that they still
continue to do.
Alright. Okay. Any you're confused? Like, so if
we're gonna have an issue with USAID, it
would matter that it was being done anywhere,
especially for another government like Israel that was
proudly professing to be about woke politics
even then. And well through Biden's administration.
Funny how that works. We just don't talk
about it when it's about the we shall
not name.
Very, very telling. I know I'm not I
know most conservatives are not being dishonest about
call it out, guys.
This one,
same point, twenty nineteen, twenty twenty. About $300,000
each. What's this one for?
Procure monitoring and elevation services for Venezuela
participation project. So, guys, the overarching game is
whether it's woke politics or not. It's about
the guys of doing what the claim is
the good thing and all it really amounts
to, as we know, through this very effort
to carry out regime change. That's what he
was doing during this effort. That's what they
tried to do. They tried to regime change
Venezuela
using the guise of USA. That's what this
was.
That's Donald Trump.
K? This one?
Monitoring, same thing. Venezuela participation.
Twenty seventeen, '20 '18. Right? So the point
is a whole another funding round through two
different years for the same agenda. Also, Venezuela.
Also, for regime change.
This one is for support public interest journalism.
That's what I was referencing before.
An independent media journalist from around international, around
the world.
And it says,
oh, actually, no. This was the hold on.
I said the wrong one.
Yeah. So to support public interest journalism
operate originating
from local and national media houses and independent
journalists. Okay. So in 2020,
Donald Trump allotted $5,000,000
through USAID
to do what?
To fund journalists
in The United States.
Isn't that what we're talking about?
Should be. That's what it says right there.
Support interest journalism public interest journalism, so propaganda,
originating from local and national media. We talked
about this both independent or both international and
local.
If if honesty matters in this conversation, the
very people that are screeching about them funding
journalists and political for $8,000,000
when it turns out there was only
a small part of it.
Because you realize, guys, this is actually USAID
for this exact thing,
and it's $5,000,000
under 2020. That's Trump. But then it goes
on and continues under Biden.
Well, that's interesting.
Look at that. So wait. This would have
been
so what what what what day was Trump
inaugurated?
Even though they would still probably argue.
Oops. I just misspelled it.
January 20. Okay. So it's before.
Either way, I just thought it was interesting.
Oh, by the way, it says zero anyway,
so I wasted time. But the major point
here, obviously, is if you're funding journalism,
national,
independent journalists, local and national, for $5,000,000,
that's objectively a lot more than USAID alone
gave to Politico.
All said and done, we're talking about subscriptions,
but this isn't subscription. This is straight up
funding journalism
that they claim were, you know, whatever, Fighting
whatever agenda they were fighting at that time.
It's about pretending to fault me. That's a
big deal.
But you're not gonna hear that from the
fake, fake partisan media out there that wants
to hype one side of the story.
Here's another one.
What's this one for? Early childhood development, mass
media activity in Bangladesh.
Twenty Eighteen, Twenty Eighteen, Twenty Nineteen, Twenty Nineteen.
Three funds
amounting to well over a million dollars in
2019 alone.
600,000
in 2020,
about 500, 6 hundred thousand in 2018,
all for Bangladesh
for early development mass media. So also media
may influence from Donald Trump aggressively
throughout his administration.
Doesn't that matter?
USAID.
K. Here's this one. This one is what?
Placeholder for
OTI training. Oh, oh, this overlap with the
I think so. I'm just trying to remember
which ones these are. I thought this was
the COVID overlap.
Training resources group. Whatever. It says placeholder for
OTI training. If you know what that is,
let me know. And digital media services procurement.
And it says right here,
incremental funding to GSA training, facilitation of digital
services,
purpose of modification, update language.
Interesting. Either way, the bottom line is multiple
times to Trump's administration over millions of dollars
through USAID
going out the door.
If this is a corrupt entity, then why
isn't this being called out through all I
mean, aggressively
through his administration?
Because you know why, guys? Because it's dishonest,
the whole thing.
International Research and Exchanges Board,
USAID.
Strengthen media system activity.
Twenty seventeen,
'1 point '5 million. Twenty '19, '2 point
'4 million. Twenty '20, '2 point '5, '2
point '6 million.
The purpose is to modify, incrementally fund, award,
and increase the obligation.
Simply strengthening media system activity. I mean, this
is what they do. It's broad and abstract,
and they are influencing the outcome on the
ground. Trump knows that. They're just playing you
right now. I think they're all doing it.
I think this is a coordinated effort.
Last one. There's and there are so many
more you could get into. The goal here
is to support
a g y w in health behavior change
by creating mutually reinforcing media products. You know,
propaganda.
Twenty eighteen, one point one million. 20 19,
one million.
Health behavior.
Right before COVID, by the way. Wonder what
that's about.
I'm sure we'll never know because they'll never
cover it. Well, to end that segment, guys,
the point is it's been reported right before
I went live, by the way, so I
didn't have any more information. But the and
it's and it's through I inside her paper,
so double check for yourself. Judge temporarily blocks
Trump administration from placing 2,200 USAID workers on
paid leave.
And maybe it's the way it's supposed to
work, guys. Maybe they never wanted to actually
bring any of it down. They just wanted
to make it look like they tried and
the Democrats stopped them. I mean, who know?
We'll have to wait that's why we wait
for outcomes. The point, though, is overall, the
narrative they're screening about is just straight up
lies
as usual. Daily Clout points out, are we
so focused on USAID scandals that we're missing
the bigger threat?
Doctor Naomi Wolf exposes shocking conflicts of interest,
data security risks, and the hidden power plays
that could put your information at risk. Right?
So she sees this, and she's calling out
basically what Catherine is, but more so on
the treasury side and the data. They're arguing
they're using that major database, which is what
we just talked about, to basically train AI
or steal your information. I mean, this is
with the influence of foreign entities that I
think is undeniable, this is terrifying. When you
know they're going after people, Americans included, as
they've stressed
if they don't agree with Israel policy, if
they want if they think they're committing a
genocide, if they support Palestine.
It's very clear. And now they've got basically
backdoor access, not just through their start up
companies that they all support, but directly.
I mean, they have front door access, it
seems.
Elon Musk then goes,
does not seem odd if you does this
thing. It directs to this thing, which gets
it 5,000,000 views.
A muse,
which got 6,000,000 on its own. That's funny.
Let's see if this went up.
8,000,000 now. But it says,
Doge. I guess, Doge says is the new
thing. It's like, the government says,
Democrats in congress didn't seem to mind that
China had remote access to every workstation
in the treasury
as recently as December.
You gotta love this, guys. I mean, this
is red I I just crazy. Now I
would never that's certainly possible. I mean, I
think all these governments are trying.
Have you seen the evidence of that?
And what's crazy to me is at a
time when you're starting to see that they
have taken
wild control of this, it's easy to go,
guess what? We found out they let China
control everything. That now that's why me doing
this is the thing and we're winning.
Well, okay. Alright. Well, if you got evidence,
I'd love to see that. Not just you
saying that or some screenshot, but actual evidence
of China somehow controlling every workstation for the
treasury. And how that even possibly makes sense
with what we've been seeing go on? That
has not been in the interest of China.
I mean, that's pretty silly. Certainly possible. But
my point would be,
literally while I think we're watching,
let's say,
Israel
do that.
And he goes, they're China. Control. Just like
we keep talking about.
Think about what he's saying. Consider that that
could be true. Ask for evidence.
And then consider what I'm saying, and look
at the mountain of evidence that shows that's
happening right now. And you wonder why he
might be,
you know,
knee jerk reactioning flow look over there
while two things are happening that make him
look concerning.
It says not a month later, they're freaking
out. Trump's appointees are accessing the very same
computers demanding violence in the streets.
Oh, is that why?
I mean, guys, this is just this is
the kind of thing. And this account, like
the rest, will just take it exactly what
they don't he like we showed you the
last time, Doge comes out and says something
online, and major platforms, even Democrat ones, are
supposed to think are attacking each other,
basically take them at face value and report
that that what was it? That they approved
every single contract with no questions, no matter
even to criminals, which wouldn't surprise me. But
nobody ever verified that. In fact, most people
are telling you that there's no evidence to
back it up to this very point. But
it doesn't matter because it got the job
done.
I'm still not saying I'm saying I don't
know. It could be.
But I'm not the kind of person that's
gonna go, we know because Elon said because
I'm pretty sure that's really stupid.
But doesn't that seem odd, he says.
I just think it's wild. While he's taking
control of it and while I think of
this government is clearly influencing it, he simply
reflexively points to the one group that you
know
his following will happily dive into and assume
is the case.
But Israel's global cybersecurity infiltration
is shockingly obvious as we've covered many times.
Or the fact that they have influenced US
influenced US tech, infiltrated it to a point
is this that they brag about it.
And they just handed Donald Trump a golden
pager as they just gave pagers out to
people that killed them over a process of
ten years. I wonder how that works out.
Our interview David Ike, Zionist infiltration of Judaism,
very important.
Or the general point, the new Trump administration
and the technocratist Zionist coup
technocratic Zionist coup of the United States, November
thirtieth.
I think that's exactly what's happening. I hope
you'll at least consider the possibility.
And just bringing it back to Catherine's point,
the Trump administration
digital control grid coming together at high speed.
Now I think it's hard to miss
with every just what we talked about today.
But she also adds, and here's Naomi Wolf
saying, guess I'm really not the only one
worried about cybersecurity
for our most precious data.
She's not happy with what's going on with
Elon because she's not I mean, it seems
that she's, I mean, the point would be
that you're willing to call it out even
if you support the general direction of the
of the partisan agenda.
It's that that's a problem. My god. That
would show the level to be able to
go, woah, even though I like what you're
doing. That's crazy because it is.
Treasury agrees to block additional Doge staff from
accessing sensitive payment systems. That was on the
sixth.
I think everyone's aware something weird is happening.
As Catherine says, the guy who was the
largest owner Trump campaign is building the world's
largest and most invasive satellite and surveillance system.
That's what Derek was writing about. And wants
to install a mesh network in the back
of your head to hook you up to
his satellites, has hijacked the world's most valuable
trove of financial data that is subject to
privacy and national security laws and done it
with workers without sufficient training or required top
secret searing security clearance. What could possibly go
wrong?
It's like, to think anybody would not be
like, that's crap. That's it's it's so it's
alarming as hell to me that we have
seemingly been overtaken by a group of screaming
children that simply do not care about anything
other than high fiving about the next thing
Elon Musk said. It's terrifying.
Now overall, Big Brother Watch just points out
a point that I think is related to
UK. The UK Government has now ordered Apple
to let them spy on users encrypted messages.
Think about that crazy shift right now when
they're trying to pretend we're not spying on
you. How does that make sense? Other than
they're pulling out all the stops. And I
think that's Israel in their manipulation and what
they're trying to accomplish. That's my opinion.
It says we are extremely troubled by reports
that the UK government has ordered Apple to
create a backdoor that would effectively break encrypt.
Why would that make sense in any context
right now?
That
I mean, I unless there's a major move
taking place. All I'm seeing is a lot
of these things being rapidly done,
and I think it speaks for itself.
Now at the end of this, and maybe
where we at. Yeah. It's already already four
hours. I'm I'm gonna wrap it up here.
Maybe I think these were the main points
of the next one.
It's just simply to show you guys that
right now, with
the unbelievable
transparent support I mean, Israel has influenced and,
I think, controlling this administration
from everybody, from Marco Rubio. I mean, get
this is the point, guys. Regardless of what
you think, understand that the world and every
single mechanism that the US government has always
told us to look to has said this
guy is a criminal, because he is. And
that's just objective fact at this point. He
has done so many things regard even if
everything he says is true,
you could prove that he's broken the law
in a hundred different ways just since October
7, and that his own people think he's
a criminal in 45 different ways, that he'd
already be in jail if he did wasn't
in charge of the government. That's not a
secret in Israel.
And that's the guy who your government pulls
out all the stops for head chairs and
ultimately
acts treats him like the president.
And everyone is supposed to arrest this man.
Everybody.
Anybody that believes international law, but they don't.
Marco Rubio's first call,
Donald Trump's very first meeting, and now Hegseth's
first official visit,
Netanyahu.
All while Netanyahu is the most infamous war
criminal on Earth
and should be arrested on-site
per international law
and is openly committing genocide with US weaponry.
Anyone confused?
We tried to warn you guys to make
them make Israel great again. Hegsetz is honored
to welcome
Israeli prime minister Pentagon as my to the
Pentagon as my first official visit. Secretary of
Defense.
Wow.
Secretary of state, secretary of defense, president. I
mean, across the board, guys, they're bowing down
for this criminal. Now you could argue if
it wasn't a war criminal, you could just
say, well, it's Israel's important to them. But
think about doing this while everything's going on
in the world. How yeah. There's no it's
not confusing to me at all.
All. And I said, adding to that, Rubio
is now showing where his America First priorities
lie
by immediately flying to Israel. That's after his
first phone call was Netanyahu, of course, because
America First guys all the way.
Rubio set to visit Israel.
I mean, think about all the different things
that we've been told Biden's ignoring, and every
one of them are just right to Israel.
It shows you that those people didn't even
care about it. It was all about going
against Biden.
But I said and this is the point
the other one. I think I've got this
next.
Or one of them. Let's go to that
next.
This man,
but, Netanyahu, is the, as I said, most
wanted war criminal on earth, and is supposed
to be arrested anywhere in the rules based
international order.
End quotes. The only problem is the US
government seems to be completely under his control.
If you think that's about Jewish people, you're
not paying attention.
Leader John Thune.
It was a pleasure to meet to host
prime minister Netanyahu at the capital today. Our
friendship between United States and Israel strengthens both
our countries.
This person knows what I was saying earlier,
and Trump just took cause out from underneath
him.
And I said, you guys are insufferable.
No words were spoken.
Nothing has happened yet. You're a grown up.
Stop being a cheerleader. Also, that's not even
remotely what he proposed. If you've been paying
any attention, this is exactly what Israel has
been proposing for years.
This is frustrating. Obviously, you could tell I
was frustrated at that moment.
And here's speaker Johnson.
I was honored to host my good friend
Netanyahu at the Capitol today. Like, they're just
folding all over themselves to make it clear
that they are on the side of this
war criminal. Here's senator Cruz.
Great meeting with my friend and leader Netanyahu
with a unified republican government. We will bolster
the US Israel alliance.
I just don't know how this is not
obvious as hell. Oh, here's Fetterman, by the
way. Cause this guy is just a, you
know, the mindless stumbling fool that they can
just make and do whatever they want, apparently.
I met on Capitol Hill in Washington with
my good friend and great supporter. I'm sure
that oh, that that's Netanyahu, by the way.
Netanyahu saying that about this guy.
Who has no brains and two thumbs.
This guy the point is, obviously, I'm not
making fun of whatever he dealt with. The
guy is not a bright guy well before
you could talk about this. And Netanyahu is
a war criminal, so I don't care. The
bottom line, guys, every one of these people
are showing themselves to be the opposite of
what we promised.
Attorney general Pam Bonney establishes task force to
prosecute October 7 crimes. Okay. What is what
are we talking about here? An American entity
is going after what?
A foreign group that's funded by Israel, by
the way, for committing crimes on or are
we talking about the Israeli government that committed
the bulk of those crimes? Either way, I
guarantee that's not it. How is that America
First?
Why is she even doing this?
I hope there's honest conservatives that have the
guts to call this out because that's obscene.
And here is
Abby Martin
breaking down, you know, why this is actually
happening.
Just so in case you forgot. Right? This
is the government being co opted. I think
we're watching right now the true culmination of
the Zionist technocratic globalist dynamic,
and it's all coming together. And this what
she's explaining to you is what's been building
till this point.
When you look at Israeli society, you know,
it started off as kind of a socialist
project with the kibbutzes, and now it's just
turned into a fascist,
supremacist state where Netanyahu reflects the true face
of Israel just like Trump reflects the true
face of of this country.
And when it's getting too toxic for even
Natalie Portman to be a, you know, this
ambassador
to Israel. You know that the tide is
turning. But, unfortunately, there's so much shit going
on. Congress hasn't said anything. They just totally
support this, man. And there's weird, like, BDS
legislation
trying to criminalize basically dissent where you have
contractors in Texas
having to sign clauses promised that they won't
support boycott of Israel to in order to
rebuild hurricane homes. What is BDS? Boycott divestment
sanctions. It's the movement that Palestinians have asked
us to help them to, you know, boycott.
And and that's what Stephen Hawking was all
about. He he he boycotted,
scientific conferences in Tel Aviv.
So this is what we gotta do, and
we have to fight our government to stop
endorsing these massacres and atrocities.
Absolutely.
Of course, that's back when Joe Rogan was
having people on that were at least pushing
back on some narratives, right, not just one
side of the paradigm,
or any side of the paradigm. Right? The
point is Abby Martin is clearly and she'll
tell you this day, left leaning, whatever. But
the point, nonetheless, is that she has been
absolutely
just constant, consistent on calling out what Israel's
doing. Whether they pretend to be left or
pretend to be right, the point is the
same. But here is what secretary Rubio
is telling you. Right? So as everything we
just saw,
all the pandering to Israel while they're committing
genocide. Right? And maybe you just think you
just can't see it. Okay. You just didn't
okay. But what how do you miss
the
Trump,
Elon Musk,
Rubio,
every one of them suddenly goes South Africa.
Okay.
He goes, I will not attend the g
twenty summit in Johannesburg.
South Africa is doing very bad things.
Ex pro ex expropriating
private property.
Oh, stealing property. Oh, that's crazy. Using g
twenty to promote solidarity, equality, and sustainability.
Oh, god forbid. We want those terrible things.
Right? Obviously, the point is always is that's
not what they're actually doing, but you see
how easy it is to make solidarity,
equality,
bad. Those are none those words are all
good things. What they're trying to do is
make it out to be woke and but
all they're now doing is making you want
bad things.
It says, in other words, DEI climate change.
Yeah. Probably. But those words don't automatically mean
those things. The bottom line is my job
is to advance America's national interest. I think
he meant Israel right there. Now waste payer
tax taxpayer dollars are coddle anti Americanism.
Okay.
South Africa. Right? It's not like Israel is
is committing major crimes around the world, stealing
property, doing very bad things. Also, isn't it
South Africa was apartheid because of Israel? Yeah.
That's right. Well, forget about that. But, see,
they didn't care back then. They actually loved
that. They only care now that it's flipped
the other way, which is just as problematic
for anyone that cares about human life and
racism. The bottom line, though,
you can't stand there with a straight face
and act like you care about calling out
South Africa while ignoring what Israel's doing.
Stealing I mean, the the land theft. Yeah.
The fact that he even says that is
unreal
to me.
But they know what they're doing, guys. They
know absolutely that they're as I said, they're
shifting into DEI climate change democrat to ignore
to get you to care more about this
story than the genocide happening that everyone in
the world can see because they are completely
overtaken by it.
And Ryan Paul,
briefly showing us things from the other show
that we'll get into next, like, next show.
Here's Rubio. Gaza must be free from Hamas.
As Poe has shared today, The United States
stands ready to lead Make Gaza Beautiful Again.
Yeah. Is that America First? Before we even
do anything in America, we jump over and
make Gaza great again?
Could you please just say it with me?
We were played.
We were lied to. That's not what we
were promised. Please have the courage to call
it out. Our pursuit is one of lasting
peace. That's what he says.
Rand Paul,
the pursuit for peace should not be that
of is the Israelis and the Palestinians.
I thought we voted for America First.
We have no business contemplating yet another occupation
to doom our treasure
treasure to do our treasury, I think, and
spill our soldiers' blood.
Right. So here is Marco Rubio proving the
point.
USAID
alive and well. It's going to be a
regime change machine just in the way they
clearly want it to be. And that's what
he's telling you.
Sad. Oh, and don't forget, Trump says, oh,
no rush, by the way, on that plan
for Gaza. Whenever whenever Israel's ready for us
to do what we need to do, we're
there for them.
No rush. Right? So they could starve. We
can bomb them and murder them. That's all
good. Whenever Israel wants us to kick them
out of the way, you let us know.
Nobody should be confused about what's going on
today. It has never ever been this clear
in my life.
Now we're gonna go over more of this.
And I'll just I'll
actually in case you forgot to end this,
not end the show, but and make sure
you see the point.
This, remember,
is how this all comes together. The Gaza
location,
according to Catherine and and if and, you
know, many other points
is apparently going to be a central location
for the new technocratic, you know, the technate.
And you know what? Maybe I will just
end with that. And Donald Trump is telling
you, it's gonna do be the new Riviera.
Right?
That's exactly what they
the Israeli government have been saying for a
long time.
Or that we want to
turn into beautiful beachfront property. And as we'll
get into the next show, Trump keeps telling
you that, you know, we're gonna move out
of the way and make it all great.
Great for who?
Great for the Jewish supremacist element that the
settlers are openly telling you is going to
take control,
which is what's happening in Lebanon and Syria
and everywhere else. That's what they're doing. Now
if you hear that as only Jewish, you're
not listening to the full picture. That's Zionism
that has turned them into radicals. Plenty of
Orthodox Jews in the world are screaming about
how that doesn't represent them.
Or Christians to Zionist Christians saying that's not
Christianity. You're being it's it's fair around the
world, people are waking up to it, guys.
Question is, are you willing to allow yourself
to see it? I've never seen something that's
obvious in my life.
Tomorrow, we're gonna get into or possibly tomorrow.
Just more about what's going on in Gaza.
Donald Trump to clean it out, Donald Trump
to occupy the area, all under a guise
that it's best for
whoever we put there next. Maybe a couple
of Palestinians, but that's I guarantee not gonna
be the case. His quotes and statements are
literally telling you it is everything we were
told it would never be. Across the board,
this has been very, very clear. So, hopefully,
this reaches some people, guys. Please cut some
of this stuff out. Make sure you highlight
this stuff and tag me in it. So
much of this needs to be shared.
But I'm doing my best ultimately to get
as much as I can out in the
times that I have available to me right
now. So
just help me get this out.
And as always, guys, we knew we we
continue to need your support.
So please, if you're out there and you
believe in what we're doing, if you recognize
how far ahead we can be on some
of these stories, because we're just being objective
and nonpartisan and being honest about what we
see and giving you the things that we
can see and letting you connect the dots,
then please
show us. Write me a letter.
The address down below. Just let me know
how you think we're doing. And if you're
if you are able, sign up for a
dollar a month. That's what we ultimately need,
is that continued support because we're gonna continue
doing this. I'd love to see it grow.
Help me do that.
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
All these settlers have set their sights on
a new prize,
one that seemed utterly impossible before October 7.
Returning to Gaza, they cheer.
That is the goal of Zionist settler organization,
Nakhala,
one of more than a dozen groups now
advocating for the reestablishment
of Israeli settlements in Gaza.
A recent promotional video even boasts that Gaza
will become the next Riviera.
A recent promotional video even boasts that Gaza
will become the next Riviera.
The Riviera of The Middle East, this could
be something that could be so bad this
could be so magnificent.