Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
I swear to god, I'm irritated as
this new StreamYard setting.
Saturday, February 1, 2025. Thank you for joining
me. Funny way to start. I'm sitting here
in the background trying to figure out how
this new setting on StreamYard is working.
Swear I had it all figured out right
before we got started. Not that you guys
need to hear it but since it started
that way, there's something that shifted in the
way these are working and now I somehow
am unable to remove this
or add this without that happening first. We're
moving, like, for the podcast. It's just a
weird funky change for StreamYard. Wouldn't have brought
it up if I didn't start out funky.
But, see, do it again. There we go.
God, that's so strange. Well, thank you for
joining me today.
I mean, really, probably one of the most
information dense shows I've done in a while
and that's saying something for how information dense
this always seems to be.
So there's a lot we're gonna get to
today. I I real I it we're it
basically broken up into 2 main things. I
kinda moved it around a bit. I wanna
start with largely foreign policy update on what's
going on with the ceasefire,
the exchange, the Bebas family because that's happening
today,
as well as a lot of the fall
kind of continuation of the coverage around
the intersection of the Israeli aspect to what's
going on in this country as well.
And the latter part of it is gonna
be focused on kind of the the the
way I framed the title today.
The under the cover of fighting DEI or
woke politics or whatever you wanna, you know,
that conversation,
I see that again, I framed it as
the deep state agenda because that's how this
seems to be understood by people today.
But that's just an amalgamist term. That's an
everyone seems to have a different opinion to
that. My point is the agenda that we've
all been fighting, whether it's the great reset,
you know, even if you see that as
just woke politics, which is I think, honestly,
we'll get into today, a fraction of the
real picture if even just something that's been
set up in order to be taken down.
So we all look in the wrong direction.
Not to say that there's not obvious real
things going on in that conversation that are
important that we should fight.
But
even Republicans are now calling this out. Go
saying, guys, we can't just call everything d
yeah. It makes it meaningless. Well, yes. Exactly.
See, I can't stop seeing parallels to the
way the Israeli government is acting and projecting.
And if we know how obvious it is,
the influence, the infiltration of this government, it
doesn't always have to be that's why. But
for example,
the allegation of antisemitism
is used in the exact same way.
It's meaningless today, and it shouldn't be because
there is racism because of the way it's
applied by Zionist to any criticism of Israel,
criticism of Israel. Now with this case, we
see things that are
in many in most cases, I would argue,
should be called out but are becoming the
focal point.
While oh, and well, there's 2 ways to
look at it or that we should discuss
as the focal point while you're missing
larger agendas that are rolled out kind of
along with it or around it
as if that's the only thing we should
be fighting, missing the larger kind of WEF
agenda around it. But also the idea that
in doing so, there's 2 examples I think
today,
going at it in a way that is
either illegal
or opens the door to more government abuse
going forward.
Now even I can come along in some
way to go, well, if we're in a
situation where and I agree. Our government is
broken. Congress is spending ridiculous amounts of you
know, again, my opinion is it's all our
government, not one side of it, which just
seems childish to me today. How obvious definitely,
obviously that's not the
truth. But the point being that
clearly I see the problems with your department
of education, for example. I mean, it's it's
transparently
a problem.
But if you're gonna go at it well,
what I was saying is so go to
go at it in a way that maybe
we you have to circumvent the controlled broken
government. Like, I understand why the logic is
there.
But if what we're seeing is them not
just kind of circumventing these broken structures, but
going at it in a way that is
not even necessary,
Say, in the conversation of congressional spending and
the way Trump is handling this through Doge,
it is opening a door to have an
an entity that's not even necessarily a real
part of the government structure at this point,
more of an advisory role that will disappear
soon.
And all the people involved with it, including
Trump himself, have egregiously obvious ties to foreign
entities without even signing ethics pledges for some
of these people. And now they're taking control
of the spending?
I mean, I get why it looks like
a win to see
what you think are the bad guys when
really it's the all of them being pushed
aside. And even my point within that as
a side note is we don't even know
for sure these are the bad guys. They
fired all these FBI agents. Okay. Good.
I mean, are they the ones that are
the problem?
I guess we're taking his word for it.
Right? But see, they're going, of course it
is because that's what he's doing. Well, do
you know that? You don't know what these
people are thinking. Don't fool yourself into thinking
you know what Trump and Elon want and
feel. You know what they tell you they
feel, which could be the truth. My point
is, how do you not know that they're
how do you know that they're not getting
rid of all the deep state fighters
in the FBI
if it's as simple as that? My point
is you don't know. It's an easy thing
to go, well, he's fighting it because he
said he did. Or here's a screenshot on
Twitter so we know.
It's really alarming how obvious this is going.
And my point was, like I mean, it's
the Twitter files dynamic.
Even if these things are real, you're still
taking it at face value without truly learning
it for yourself or understanding it or looking
beyond a screenshot of a screenshot that Trump
shared on true social and then screenshot it
and share it on Twitter and we just
know it falls I mean, I'm seeing
people I otherwise respect,
intelligent people who are simply going, okay. Because
Elon said this happened today, now we know.
And I'm going, woah. Woah. We haven't even
gotten the details yet. It's a tweet he
put out on on so on on Twitter.
And then, I mean, the entire corporate media
is reporting it as if we already know
it's true. And as far as I can
tell at that moment in time, nobody did
other than Elon tweeting it out.
That seems like a terrifying shift for me,
or really just
the reality of the mainstream media, how it's
always been, but it's bleeding into everything. And
now we're pretending the independent media is basically
what this extension of the mainstream media that's
taken over that. But all of this is
important to me because of how I think
we're being played. We're being sidestepped.
That we should be fighting some of these
things, but that should not be the only
thing. And I'm clearly of the mind that
these things are, like we've talked about in
the past, transgendered
conversation being, at least in one part of
this, a,
I guess, a backdoor to the transhumanist conversation.
And that's not even a secret, guys. You
can tie this back to the origins of
that conversation to a lot of these points.
We've gone over all of this. So if
we know that, and I've seen Republicans cover
this in-depth, why do we not then stand
back and go, woah. Okay. Well, just fighting
the the pronoun big game is not the
only thing we should be cheering. And not
to say that's what's going on entirely in
that conservative conversation.
People are calling this out. People are going
good step. Now what's next? But I'm seeing
in the main part of this
almost as if it's a means to an
end and almost recognizing that
if we feel that's the only thing we
have to do, then they can easily get
you to, you know, the whole winning game
that's being played right now. Just things that
are clearly not in their interest. Or as
I said before, taking action that actually makes
you less free or less
that undermines your rights or allows the government
to take more invasive action in your life.
But as long as they're hurting the Democrats,
winning.
It's it's it's frustrating. And let's just even
say Trump is doing it for the best
of intentions. With the best of intentions, what
happens when a Democrat person comes into power
and absorbs all the same things you gave
them?
Somehow, they always have this secret mindset that
they're never that we'll do things that won't
let that happen, or we'll never let them
be in power again. It's it's it's a
game that's always played. So I'll leave it
there since we have a lot lot lot
to talk about today, but
I want everyone to be on guard around
this stuff. I know our general audience always
is because we question everything.
Right? It's basic.
But there's a lot of people that I
think are in that mindset
but have, like, a block when it comes
to things that they want to see
or especially the low like, the lowest common
denominator
rung of the, you know, as long as
we make fun of the Democrats or as
long as we call the Republicans Nazis that
we're winning or that we get you know,
we gain from that or our our momentum
is more than it it's it's what we
call team sport politics. And none of it
has the intention of changing anything in your
life for the better, simply keeping you running
in place so they can carry out their
agenda.
But let's start with
there we go. Let's start with the conversation
of foreign policy today.
And you and if you're truly gonna stick
with me today, and I hope you always
do. I know most of you don't have
the time as much as, you know, it's
just it is what it is. Long form
content, I think, is really the most important
thing today, but I know it's hard for
everyone to just carve the time out with
the way our lives are designed to be
able not to do that. Right? If that
made sense to you.
Then, ultimately, you'll see the connection between this
coming from the foreign policy side all the
way around over because if you know, keep
in mind my thought around
what I believe is the obvious problem we're
dealing with.
And I believe whether it's the DEI aspect
or really just the woke politics, the over
focus on those things, I believe we're being
sabotaged for the interest of a foreign government's
agenda. And I think your government knows that,
which is alarming.
And I think the signs, the red flags,
the proof
is everywhere. And I say it like that
for a reason because it's not questionable that
these people are influenced by a foreign government.
The only question becomes, are they doing so
at the expense of American interests?
But I think that's transparent.
So if you see the overlap, we need
to start asking whether these people who you
believe are fighting against what I think is
the deep state, or rather I said that
wrong. If the people you think are fighting
the deep state, when I think they're working
with the people that are that,
The globalist deep state, everything. Well, that's Israel.
That's the United States government, all of it.
That is the infrastructure we're actually recognized. That's
the Palantir overlap with US intelligence and that's
what that is.
The unelected power structure that is there that
has been given a
beef that are on steroids right now because
of what Trump's administration is doing.
But as long as we keep calling out
the pronouns,
apparently, we're winning.
So first, I wanna show you what Steve
pointed,
posted today.
On April 4th, TLav and I will be
playing music with some of our favorite people.
Really just kind of like a little gathering
before this, like a birthday party because both
of our birthdays are around the same moment.
And on the 5th, the next day,
Tripoli and a bunch of others and, you
know, a lot of stuff's gonna be happening
for what he's a part of which is
the,
what was it called again? It's the
if I remember off the top of my
head, 3rd eye carnival.
And the the link, just for the record,
this link here for some reason didn't work.
That's why I shared this one, which is
the link if you wanted to buy tickets
to join us and have fun. Just wanna
throw that out there. It should be a
good time.
Now, I wanna start with a point, a
quick point about censorship.
The parts of all. I'm not I I'm
following him. I'm not too familiar with a
lot of his work.
He I'll just read what he said here.
And it's interesting because this is a person
who was pretty pro Elon Musk and pretty
happy about the whole thing that's going on
with, you know, saving free speech and all
that. There's a lot of disillusioned people coming
out about this right now, and it's just
not being engaged with, as you might imagine.
Today will be my final day on x,
he says, for a very long time, if
not ever,
if not forever. Like most, I was lured
here with the promise of free speech, which
has turned out to be a total lie.
The truth is I have never liked social
media for my for most most of my
life and I've avoided using it. I never
wanted to be the algorithm guy, let alone
the algorithm guy for social media. But something
we end up sometimes we end up on
a path we've tried to avoid. Normally, I
wouldn't even announce my departure, but I've made
too many good friends here to leave them
hanging without saying something. I wanna be clear
that I'm not leaving because I feel defeated,
but because I want to focus on efforts
in on other things in real life. Now
I'll tell you. Right? Just put
if it wasn't that I that my work
was so intertwined with not just Twitter, but
just online engagement,
I mean, I would've done this a long
time ago. I'm very aware of of the
mental health overlap when it comes to losing
yourself in this. You know? And and I
I just what I do is just I
just constantly check myself. I have to. I
can't let myself
be lured into the idea that what we're
seeing in this fake reality is the representation
of the world. Always remember that. It's almost
never the full picture, if not even the
reality.
But so what he's saying is I'm just
gonna find solutions or actions in real life,
which you all should. He says thank you
all for the incredible journey and support of
the game along the way. The success I've
had here wasn't mine alone. It was ours
to share because without all of you, it
would have never happened. I wish nothing but
the best, and so on.
The Free Thinkers Project says, sad to see
you go. I feel the same exact same
way. Maybe I'll follow your lead. So I
just thought it's inte I just thought it's
interesting. Because if we're being honest with ourselves,
there's not free speech on this platform.
Period. Now you can argue it's better. It's
debatable for a lot of very obvious reasons,
but it's not free speech. If we know
their sensory, which they are, it's not, period.
But this game they play where they pretend
that it's not only it's a free speech
platform, but that they're saving free speech. People,
like like, really bombastically stupid things like Jones
saying that he's literally saved free speech for
the planet or without him, we'd all be
doomed. Like, just it makes me laugh out
loud
that I think anybody that he that I
that almost that I know he doesn't think
that. That either he's playing, making or either
way, he doesn't the point is that it's
childishly stupid to think that what isn't even
happening here is somehow saving, but the reality
is he knows that.
So he you should feel like he's making
fun of you when he pushes these things
that you know as a matter of fact
aren't even the reality. But either way, overall,
I think this is a small aspect of
the larger game that's being played to get
you lured in to following
along. The Pied Piper.
Now I wanted to show something I thought
was interesting on that very small note. I
keep trying to show these different things because
what I really think is happening on Twitter
right now is far more surreptitious and underneath
than we're than we're seeing. And I think
that's very obvious. But I just I was
trying to find a tweet of mine
that was gone.
Oh, no. No. That's not what it was.
It was I was trying to find the
last I was looking up the last American
Vagabond in general on the archive to see
if there there was a archive of my
just general channel. Right? And the reason I
was doing that is because I wanted to
find I I it's I can't tell if
I'm wrong or not, but I I could've
swore that we were just about the past
80,000 subscribers on on the channel.
Let me do this real quick, and I'll
show you what those are.
I just mentioned it. Right? I I could
have been wrong. It's always certainly possible,
but I was I thought we were at
79 point something. It could be that we
were at 69 point something, and I just
kinda misread it. But I was thinking, well,
we're almost at 80,000. And I said that
the other day. And I came on the
other day, and I'm like, what? What do
you mean? 70 1? That's wild. So I
looked up social blade, but it only goes
back to, like, it before it passed 70.
I couldn't see beyond that. I was like,
well, that's weird. So I decided let's look.
Let's let's go back and see if I
can find the archive. Long story short, I
found 1. I was like, oh, cool. Let's
check it out. And so here's what happens.
Oh, shoot. Don't go back. Okay. Good. Damn
it. Okay. Good. It's still there.
So open this.
Watch
this. So this is this is a this
is an archive of my channel, right, for
the last America, the TLA Vagabond. And there's
2 of them. 1 for 2024,
12024, and 12025.
This this loads, but watch what it loads
into. If it doesn't load fast enough, I've
got it loaded already.
Okay? Look at this. Redirecting
to Lebanon trend.
What?
That's consistently, by the way. So why why
is
okay. Well, now it says don't something went
wrong, but here's the page.
Lebanon Trend.
Ain't that strange? So the way that and
I I don't I'm not claiming I know
with this even Twitter, but the point is
this is the way back machine being because
I I think we've seen pretty clearly that
the way back machine has been somehow manipulated
by a lot not just Twitter, but there
there there are archives being pulled. The largely
that seem to be related to Israel. That's
crazy to me. But isn't that wild?
And then if you look at the account,
it's actually suspended on Twitter right now. I
don't know what that means. But if you
look and you the the archive, it goes
to this other channel. I mean, I my
opinion the reason I'm showing that is I
think there's weird things happening, whether it's about
trying to
create false realities, trying to circumvent things, trying
to
redirect. I mean, echo chambers, all this kind
of stuff. And so I just thought that
was odd, and I wanted to share that
with you. You look at it for yourself
and tell me what you find. Check out
yours, see if there's something different. But I
do find that strange. And let me know
if you if you think we lost 10,000
followers which wouldn't surprise me. But not an
important thing. I just wanted to share that.
And there's gonna be a one or two
other points like that that show you which
I've shown before. For example, if I'm trying
to show you Donald Trump saying something and
you look it up and it doesn't show
it there even though the tweet's there. That's
consistently happening. I mean, you guys have seen
it. Very few people seem to wanna point
it out. Or I'll try to look up
a a tweet that I are that I
quoted
in sharing,
except my quotes never show up. But they're
there.
It's just small things like that. Those are
the kind of small suppression tactics that guarantee
channels like ours that are objective and nonpartisan
keep suppressed, or rather just really, really stepped
on. So it takes
30 years longer than anybody else to actually
make it get grow. That's what I'm seeing.
That you can look and your your quotes
are supposed to pop up early. I'll show
you that as we go through it. But
I think that's important for us to remember
that there there's not a balance in all
of this that's deliberately being anchored and driven
into the very people that I think are
screaming about DEI and all the rest of
it. That's that's what I believe is happening.
So first on social on a foreign policy.
This
overlapping with Israel as well for two reasons
or just both of these things. Trump's Greenland
obsession may be about extracting metals for tech
billionaires.
Now, just on the first part, like, Greenland
in general, like, we we shouldn't move away
from how ridiculous all of this is. This
is naked imperialism.
Doesn't matter what narrative you spin up. They
don't want it. The government doesn't want it.
Then we all scream about national borders and
everything being very important, you know, accepting when
we want something or when Trump tells us
it's good for us. You know, it's just
it's late. That's one of the over points
I was saying before. Okay. Fine. Let's say
you thought that was in your interest. Well,
then make it happen the way that we
pretend we actually are.
Right? Freedom and liberty and all that. Not
just words, but actual principles
instead of just moving it aside because might
makes right or strength peace through strength.
It's just war, guys. They're just driving you
in to be the very thing that you
said you're not. I mean, all of us.
It's like, like, a lot of what I'm
seeing today is about driving us to almost
want or call for an authoritarian government without
knowing or claiming that's what it is. It's
like it's like pretending we have a free
free speech platform while we're being censored. It's
about as Orwellian and stupid as that.
So we'll get to that when we get
to the diversity. I like the picture I
used today. Well, I'll get to that when
I get to that. But the absurd part
of it is, like, pretending these things, like,
even the word diversity.
It's not it's it's like sustainability with the
World Economic Forum, guys. They've tricked people into
thinking those things are bad, and they're not.
They shouldn't be overcompensated. They shouldn't be forced.
But the idea of, you know, the idea
always we should be hiring and mookie on
a meritocracy mindset, guys. Always. That's what everybody
should be doing. Who's best for whatever position?
And you should I don't think it should
even matter about diversity when it comes to
the idea of color, you know, skin color.
It's ridiculous. But a lot of cases in
the world
and a lot of normal diversity is a
can can be a positive thing. Of course,
it can obviously, as we've seen, be something
that's abused. My point, though, is that these
words, like on that wall you can see
on the picture, they say compassion.
And freedom of us paint over, though, because
those are democrat things. It's just so sad
to see this. So my point is those
people are being played
to convince them to think that things that
are not or let's just even say just
benign. Like, just things that are there are
becoming bad only because you see it as
the thing that they're doing it as. Like,
sustainability is not sustainability. They're doing they're actually
attacking sustainability
and then you attack it too because you
think that's a it's crazy to me. So
in this case, Greenland is about their control
over these things. In this case, it's just
about the the the rare earth minerals for
the artificial intelligence infrastructure
that is going to be
controlling your life. And Unless I forget, spending
a $100,000,000,000
right out of the gate and 400,000,000,000 more
over the next so many years, I guarantee
that will not wash. You are gonna be
end up spending more money than whatever $1,000,000,000
they shave off with these peanut
DEI programs, which a $1,000,000,000 is a lot
of money. But if you're already on the
hook to spend a 100,000,000,000 the first I
mean, let's be clear.
You're not gonna come out pretending you shaved
off money, but they want you to think
that's the case. They want you to think
we succeeded by look. We saved all this
because we hurt the Democrats. And then we
went on to spend 499,000,000,000
more dollars just with the first program they
rolled out.
So let's wait and see if they can
shave off another $499,000,000,000
worth of DEI, which I don't think is
there. The point is if they get you
thinking you've won already, you won't pay attention
when they roll out the technocrat
prison. But this is clear.
This is not something that we should support
unless this is going through the right channels
or the right you know, that creative people
even want this, which I don't think is
the case.
Or we have this kind of con this
is the same conversation. This is the North
Amer I'll grab that by the way. This
is the North American Union.
The very thing
that, well, all these people that are currently
supporting seem to have been fighting for pretending
to anyway. That's what we're talking about. As
Israel's globalist ambitions become clear, TeamSport Republicans endorse
the North American Union. Right? Globalism and all
this. That is Israel, guys. What they're doing
is objectively globalism, and they have the very
clear plan that they'll tell you about if
you even listen, and not just listen to
a Jones or or anybody else or the
corporate media, because they're pretty much the same
thing right now. Because they will tell you
that they're the ones, you know, or they
won't even mention it while talking about the
tricoms and globalism when literally, they're the ones
rolling this stuff out.
Saved that for you.
So this one, Pete heads Hegseth refuses, and
let's not forget who we're talking about. Every
one of these people are, like, wild eyed
Zionists,
openly telling you about biblical rights and prophecies.
And these are the people that are deciding
military actions or at least pretending to. He
refuses to rule out military strikes on Mexico,
which by the way, to be objective about
this, they always say this, but it's a
very bombastic American type thing. All options are
on the table. All it really means is
we will if we want to. It's it's
kind of a childish thing to do. To
say, like, well, I'm not gonna say I
won't because I if I I don't wanna
say I can't. Like, I wanna be able
to say it. At the end of the
day, what you're basically saying is we'll win,
then we can nuke you if you want.
Well, yeah. That's what that means. Doesn't mean
they're going to.
All options? Well, that means chemical weapons, doesn't
it? Biological weapons.
Let's not pretend like I think that's what
they're gonna do. But at the end of
the day, this is a bombastic
threat
against your neighbor, literally sharing a border. And
all of this is about striking up the
conversation because, I mean, think about it like
this. If you're Mexico,
you know what the US government acts. That's
not something you take in stride.
You go, well, okay. Well, then we're on
a military footing. Even if they just did
that to get a better deal, which is
the kind of nonsense you hear from people,
which doesn't mean it's not it could be.
Doesn't change the fact that there's real world
consequences,
but it's just probably what they want. I
think that's the reality. I think they want
this to spin out of control.
Let's not forget,
the point of what Israel is trying to
accomplish is to destabilize this country, to flood
this with immigration. That's their stated policy.
Don't listen to me. Listen to them. But,
anyway, this is the kind of things we're
seeing, whether it's Panama or Mexico or Greenland
or Canada. And we'll get to the tariff
point in a little bit.
I gotta remember, we have a lot to
get to so I can't link languish in
these conversations. I always wanna get into a
lot. So here is what I wanna get
into on top of all of this. K.
So those are just some starting points. If
you didn't see the peace president just bombed
Somalia. Okay? Now, of course, the same conversation
as always.
And we'll get into this, by the way,
and show you
that Donald Trump deployed military personnel on the
ground in Somalia during his last administration, but
didn't start any wars. Just don't call it
that. Doesn't mean it's obviously what we're talking
about. Or assassinated Soleimani, which could've caused an
entire war, or tried to overthrow Venezuela, which
could've done the same. The point is he's
doing the same things that all the rest
of them are doing is frame it differently
and maintained all the same wars. In this
case, why are we still bombing Somalia? Why
are they still have people in Somalia? Why
are they still because of the same conversation
we've always had, whether it's about geo geostrategic
control, resources,
or simply because Israel wants it. All three
of those things are true. Or if we're
more looking to pretend that Donald Trump bombed
Somalia to take out ISIS people that he
apparently defeated 17 times over last time, then
we then I have a bridge to sell
you. On top of the fact that we
should not forget, ISIS and Al Qaeda are
literally proxy armies of the United States government
in Israel. I'm not gonna stop pushing that
point because it is verifiably true and it's
easy to see if you look at the
evidence, which we'll go through briefly. Today is
not about that in in specific, but ultimately
the point about Somalia and how it ties
into this, and we've covered for a long
time.
But US government orders air strikes against ISIS
targets in Somalia. Again, don't miss the point
of how funny it is to claim he's
defeated ISIS, but now starts bombing them. But
obviously, of course, his game is that while
we defeated him, moo you know,
what's the word he used? Like, there's there's
some remnants, but it's basically defeated. But that's
not even then,
Trump has made comments about that or ISIS
k or all these different games they're playing.
My overarching opinion, this is something that they're
doing. Right? That what we're seeing are elements
not this specific bombing, but ISIS and also
ISIS k and the the Croker City Hall
attack. These are elements of their same proxy
game. Whether it's like their funding and arming
of the Azov Nazi movement or the moderate
rebels or any number of these same exact
things they do all around the world. They
arm and fund and work with the worst
elements you can see. It's very provable. Just
like they worked with Saddam Hussein before they
took him out. Just like they worked with
Osama bin Laden before they took him out.
You see the pattern? It's obvious.
So this really quickly, United States used manned
fighter jets. Now I I was thinking about
why that what the relevance there is. I
think it might become more in a second
versus drones, which is what they almost have
always used in Somalia versus a manned flight.
Now the first just thought jumped in my
mind is they don't want this to be
seen as like Obama, the because he he
drone bombed this place like crazy. But Trump
continued it in the 2016 and 17, but
it was not as much, but it was
still problematic and illegal.
But on top of that, I kinda get
the sense that it's about trying to stay
away as much as you can away from
the drone
conversation
because that's what they're doing. Because that's coming.
Because the technocracy Palantir dynamic is being shoved
down your throat, you know, but they don't
wanna point to it because they're pretending they're
fighting both d I DEI over here. That's
that would be my thought. But let's wait
and see. It's an interesting choice, isn't it?
Why would you use a man fighter jet
that's far more expensive and would have that
has human life that could be lost?
Seems like an odd choice, doesn't it? It
seems like a not strategic choice. So you
want you wonder why. But maybe there's something
I'm missing. And it says, an airstrike against
Islamic State targets in Somalia.
3 US officials told them. President Trump and
defense secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed the airstrike, claiming
no civilians were harmed. They see that every
time. And almost every time, it turns out
to be not true.
It's simple, guys. You look at the history
yourself. In most cases, it ends up being,
you know, grudgingly reported as well. They were
in an area or like Obama,
Well, they were in a location where we
deemed them we deemed it war. Therefore, anyone
in that location is now combatant.
That's not a joke, by the way. If
they were there when we bombed, they're a
combatant. That was what they actually did, and
they do the same thing here.
So and I'll just be clear. Donald Trump's
administration has already shown themselves to be, like,
spectacularly
dishonest in ways that are blatantly obvious to
see. Gaza condoms and the drone conversation,
California and the military with the water. It's
it's just it's sad. But something tells me
they wanted those things to be seen. Who
knows why?
But it says no civilians. No details were
released about the targets aside from the president
labeling them, quote, senior ISIS attack planner.
A senior ISIS attack planner in caves in
Somalia.
It's kinda silly, isn't it? Like, let's be
real about this. Even though caves of Osama
bin Laden, that was also kind of a
manipulation,
especially since we now know if you actually
care to look that this was not what
they made it out to be. These are
elements of their proxy armories, but it seems
like an odd game. So cutting to the
chase, I get the sense this might not
even be real. Just just my gut.
Doesn't mean they didn't kill people, but, like,
whether this was even some kind of an
ice academy. You know, it's also possible that
nothing even happened. That they just like the
military in California or like they just made
it up. So far, that seems to be
something they like to do either way. And
let's not make it about left or right
here. Our government lies to us as a
matter of policy.
God, I think we'll see more of this
as it goes forward, like whether they use
this or not and how it develops. But
notably, the strikes were not drone strikes, but
were carried out by fighter aircraft from then
this is one thing I honestly, this is
what I think was the most relevant.
And also why they're bombing Somalia, which has
to do with what they're doing in this
location
from the USS Harry Truman, which was which
is currently in the Red Sea.
Okay. Perfect. So right between
Africa and Saudi Arabia. In perfect striking position
for what's going on in Israel and what
they're doing in the Middle East.
So maybe it's them just going, that's what
we're we're just growing after ISIS over here
and totally not just facilitating Israel's genocide,
which is what we know what they're doing.
Maybe both. But I'm I'm convinced that is
in fact major parts of this. That Israel
wants them in this location for what they're
trying to accomplish, and that's just a way
to make it make sense.
So here is what Donald Trump said. This
morning, I ordered precision military air strikes on
the senior ISIS attack planner,
on the senior ISIS attack planner. Just so
it's clear. He didn't make it plural. He
didn't make it out to he's the senior
ICE attack planner. Don't you think we would
have a name or a fate or something
other than this? Nobody seems to report it
unless it happened in the last couple hours.
And other terrorists, he recruited and led in
Somalia.
These killers who were found hiding in caves
threatened the United States and our allies.
This is just a wild thing to think
about. You know who else threatens our US
ally? The Israel constantly
or China or Russia or plenty of things
you could but we're gonna go with caves
in Somalia. Like, it feels like a contrived
or story.
On top of the fact that we're talking
about,
you know, recruited in Somalia, which we can
prove as we'll get into in a second
that these are elements that have been used
and influenced and funded and trained in a
lot of ways by the United States.
Our military has targeted this ISIS attack planner
for years, and here's where, of course and
this overlaps to the point that I was
making before.
Whether DEI or just bad democrat is the
only that that seems to take away the
conversation.
He goes, but Biden and his cronies wouldn't
act quickly enough to get the job done.
You mean decide for the fact that Obama
bombed this place into smithereens for his entire
administration, and they just pretend Obama's running Biden.
So how does that make sense? Or the
fact that Biden also continued
it's just a it's just words. It's it's
a way to go, oh, okay. So it's
a good thing because Biden didn't do it.
I'm not making this up, guys. That is
as simple as that gets for some of
these people.
If if if democrat, then bad. If Trump
says democrat did, then we do good.
Like, I was just like, I can't make
it any stupid. That's as stupid as this.
Because at the end of the day, it's
basic, basic, basic reverse psychology.
Clinton wouldn't build the biometric wall, and so
they go, wait. I'll do it.
Not realizing 10 seconds ago they were fighting
it because of the great reset. But now,
Clinton bad.
Now just to be clear as always, I'm
not talking about the majority. I really, really
don't think that. I'm of the mind that
the vast majority of people right now are
very much concerned about a lot of this.
Just don't know where to go, don't wanna
talk to because they get pushed out of
the circle by the who they thought were
their friends. I mean, that's that's where it's
just like with COVID 19, but slanting to
the republican side.
He says,
but I did. Right. Biden didn't do what
I did. The message to ISIS and all
others will who who would attack America is
we will find you and we will kill
you. He loves doing that. Big bombastic statements
when,
I mean, it it they're even seeing this.
They even care. This is for you. This
is for your propaganda.
And let's not forget, Trump is very well
aware that this is something that they've been
working with their entire lives.
Now and I and I'll get to my
post in a second. Of course, this is
the kind of thing you get, and you
remember this clip. By the way, this clip
was denied even by a lot of republic
at the time. This was Obama
saying and us training our ISOL forces, ISOL.
That's the Islamic state in the Levant. That's
what they're talking about. And he said it
because we know this, and it got later
proved when we're talking about the moderate rebels.
They were funding the terrorists, which continued through
Donald Trump's administration, guys, just like the funding
and support of the Syrian group, Al Qaeda,
hi, Karol Shamm, in Syria, which I'll point
out at the end of this segment. Was
it something that they both administrations were okay
with? And now we see why. Because they
were chosen to rule in Syria. You know,
the terrorists they were fighting or pretending to
or, you know, fighting in large quotes.
But here's what I said.
So you attack your proxy army?
Or is this simply another made up or
altered story to play your base for Israel?
Hashtag Gaza condoms, hashtag California water, hashtag drones.
And it's getting some look at the engagement
on this. Underneath drones, but probably that. But,
you know, I think a lot of people,
even supporters, are
this this doesn't make sense.
Right? No warriors where the peace, but all
you know, immediately bombing, immediately artificial intelligence, immediately
mRNA, immediately everything that seems to challenge what
we thought this was. Yeah. Start showing your
principles and integrity and take a stand and
go this is not right. Like, a lot
of them are. Right? Simon Godek was the
one calling out just the other day or,
oh, I think I have it in here
about the free speech dynamic. What he did
with the executive order is
explicitly a violation of your constitutional rights.
But far too many people don't care because,
you know, I think largely because it's bad
democrat protesters. That's as simple as a guess.
Because they showed you the ones with blue
hair, and they ran and then they made
up stories about how they were attacking Jews.
None of it was true.
And I'll include this, false flags, a secret
history of Al Qaeda, watch along q and
a, the 3 different parts of James Corbin's
amazing documentary, which I again, if you haven't
seen and you watch, I don't if unless
if you have any discernment I shouldn't even
say it like that. Like, there's no way
you could watch this and walk away without
going absolutely without question. This is clear. What
what the evidence shows. As always, question everything.
Look at it, question it, find more evidence,
do your due diligence. But in my opinion,
it what it shows you is
transparently obvious.
Now, by the way, the what what I
said a second ago in regard to,
I guarantee you there was some level of
left protester that did something that I would
criticize. That that might have been a crime.
Maybe they attacked a Jewish person. Maybe they
secretly hated Jews.
But when you look at the information and
even what the police reported and even what
people I mean, it's it's obvious. I mean,
there were there were holocaust supporters that were
hand in hand with the people they claimed
were hating Jews. And most of the groups
at, like, Columbia, for example, were Jewish organizations
fighting against the genocide.
That that that all got lost in the
mix when they were screaming that it was,
you know, some pogrom against Jews.
Now,
again, don't notice the Cradles article not popping
out on this non censorship platform because that's
how this tends to work.
Let's see if it pops up there. Nope.
And this was what I'm highlighting is their
article talking about ISIS,
and that's why you don't get to see
it because they're suppressing this. ISIS conducts new
attack on army positions in Central Syria 2023.
Right. So it makes sense. Right? Because ISIS
is fighting against
the West, and the Jews, we're told, but
then fights Iran and Syria
and Iraq, you know, and all the people
that Israel doesn't like.
Like, hey. I should it's like it's it's
just I can't even, with a straight face,
talk about did did anybody confused about that?
Anybody confused about how there's no way that
even lines up? That the moment that they're
going, Iran is the leading state sponsor of
terrorism, and ISIS attacks them or attacks Israel.
Another context, he goes, oh, I'm sorry. We
didn't mean to attack you. That's a real
story.
Actually, I should that's one I should grab
because this is people never believe that.
ISIS fighters regret attacking Israel and have apologized.
That's Newsweek. Former defense minister says,
Either you're just ignoring it because you don't
wanna believe it, or the point is all
this together shows you something you can't deny.
I at the very least, ISIS is not
what we're being told. Or at the very
least, Iran or the ones that are attacking
are not. Because you can't pretend they're the
leading state sponsor of terrorism, and then the
group that you keep telling us is the
leading terrorist group in the world attacks them.
It's just basic basic deductive logic.
So I said, and just like that, ISIS
suddenly starts attacking the enemies of Israel and
the US government again. Completely by coincidence, of
course, as usual,
after being 100% defeated a few times.
And, again, I I I tag James Corbett's
work because it's important to see.
Now, also, this was January 7th. This is
the one that I was referencing really.
ISIS claims responsibility for deadliest attack in Iran
since 79 revolution.
Okay? How many times exactly do we need
to see ISIS attack the enemies of Israel
at the peak of hostile rhetoric, which is
when this was, before we truly understand what
we're seeing.
If anything they say about this group is
true, they would be attacking Israel. They would
be attacking inside the United States. They would
be attacking anywhere, but where they're attacking would
seem to be focused on the enemies of
Israel.
Over and over and over and over. Over
and over and over.
When's when's the last time they they attacked
Israel? Oh, that's right. Never. Maybe there's a
reason for that. You remember this? This is
the,
C SPAN clip talking about that,
which is important. I mean, I don't I
wouldn't say this proves
exact what they're saying, but it's important to
think about the overlap. And then the evidence
we do have, I think, is, you know,
you could I would say, I feel it's
proven. I think I would say and you
know I don't use that lightly. But at
the very least, the evidence is overwhelming.
But this is from C SPAN a while
back. Bolton and
others.
You tell the story about how you try
to find out what the
what they call the Mossad when they deal
with, publicly? I thought it was a reasonable
question, but the trouble is, you can't pick
up the phone book. There's no, Langley in
in Israel as you can look up, you
know, CIA or in our case, the Mossad.
We thought we should ask,
what shall we call it in English? You
can translate the Hebrew words. As I said,
Mossad is institute. But when they write a
letter to their friends in the CIA or
the British intelligence, what do they call themselves?
It took a while. It was a matter
of asking the prime minister's spokesman. The best
you could do because officially,
the Mossad is under the prime minister's office.
And, I think he sort of wondered why
he wanna know and all that, so we
explained. And he came up with, the Israeli
Secret Intelligence Service. I mean, if it were
to have initials, it would be I s
I s.
Just simple words like that. Interestingly enough, a
kind of a British model.
And, of course, at the time, they weren't
like, oh, because it it wasn't, you know,
it didn't it didn't necessarily exist in the
context we see today.
So I
ISIS. ISIS.
Certainly could just be a coincidence, but how
many coincidences do we ignore?
You know, like this for example. Using terrorist
forces, Israel moves to take Syria.
And US Israel openly admit they support Al
Qaeda. Right. Okay. So if we watch them
support the group that at the time when
I when this was being reported, they hadn't
even removed the bounty. Jalani had a $10,000,000
bounty on his head, and they were supporting
him for leadership.
They were kind of trying to water it
down at the moment until they got that
out of the way, and then they now
they've come out in full. Jalani is now
the leader of Syria right now. He was
elected
by the military junta, because that's democracy. Right?
No. There was not an election, guys. He
was put in place by these people. The
ones screaming about democracy when they don't like
the actual leader that's elected by the people
in places they don't want to be free
or the just they want to suppress. And
I shouldn't say it's always that. I'm I
don't think any of these governments have the
interest of peoples in their in their minds.
I really don't. I'm a pessimist for government.
But, nonetheless, it matters that they're lying about
what's going on if people vote or elect
somebody like keeps happening in Venezuela, for example,
which international observers continue to agree with was
the case. Now question it. Of course. But
if all we have is Elon Musk screaming
they're wrong and everybody else going, come on,
guys. It becomes very obvious. And things like
this.
They are working with ISIS and Al Qaeda
on the ground in public fashion. Here is
a real look. Take a screenshot of this
and look it up for yourself. Look it
up on the on TinEye. That image
is from Syria
post the overthrow.
That's an ISIS patch on one of the
people that they're supporting, or this one, which
is a guy that was assassinating Syrians
on the ground wearing an ISIS patch. I
mean, it's public just like the alzav movement
with Nazi and ISIS patches. I mean, it's
crazy what people will ignore.
So the reality is, if we're gonna be
honest about this, these are the people they
support. Al Qaeda, ISIS, the same terrorist they
pretend they're fighting, just like Israel funding Hamas
to keep them divided.
They're using these people to think to make
you think they're in a war against them.
They're in a war against you
and your rights.
So in Somalia's context, why is so let's
let's re to be clear again, we're talking
about ISIS being bombed in Syria or the
claim of the main planner of ISIS. Okay.
Despite all the evidence showing that both Trump
and, well, really, just the US government, but
through both Trump
and Biden and Obama's and but for smart
backers, you can look for the most part
in the context of ISIS existing. They have
been there's been evidence that they've been overlapped.
Working with arming funding, creating for the purposes
of the very thing we've seen, the war
of terror that was used to create the
surveillance state. Now we're seeing phase 2 to
create the, well, like, technocrats surveillance state. The
the what I call it with the, I
keep forgetting that. We'll get to it. The,
you know, the the AI infrastructure. The bio
AI infrastructure they're rolling out.
So in this case, the point is in
2017,
if we're gonna pretend that this is something
that he's not a part of, why did
Trump send troops to Somalia in 2017?
It simply says president Trump is outlined defeating
radical Islamic terrorism as his foremost foreign policy
agenda.
Well, we okay. What happened?
What happened during Obama's
anytime you wanna sense the war on terror
of terror,
well, every every administration, you can, by metrics,
prove that it only got worse.
And then what does that who who benefits
from that? Well, the group telling you that
that's the problem they need to fight, that
they they need to get more power and
more surprise Israel.
If you don't remember by now that we
have been fighting Israel's wars for our your
entire lives,
and and there's a thousand people from Jeffrey
Sachs that all will point that out, then
I don't think you want to see it.
They're Israel, Netanyahu in particular, has been constantly
being shown in congress, the one driving them
to these things. And then every time it
ends up with a destructive outcome that doesn't
help the United States, and we keep doing
it. They keep doing it. The government keeps
doing it.
Why? Because they're compromised.
Because ultimately, in that process, it gives them
more control over your lives, which benefits both
of them.
But it says, but given the US leader's
insistence on putting American interest first,
just like today, but isn't true, the Somali
deployment raises the question of what threat Al
Shabaab poses to the United States.
When you think about it, guys, with all
this going on in the world,
Israel showing a very clear concern, but other
than them, there's obviously people that are far
more concerning, but this happens. Now why? Why
would Donald Trump waste the time and the
effort and the resources to go after groups
in a cave? Because they want you to
think it's a massive network. Right? But a
network we just showed you seems to be
it almost uniquely going after their enemies. Okay?
Well, that's interesting. I think it's obvious because
of what we're gonna show you next. That
this is an important location for what Israel's
trying to accomplish. With the greater reset dynamic
as well. But it says, the question is
for a fair one. From a US perspective,
do we really have a dog in this
hunt?
Says Kenneth men, Minkas, professor of political science,
Davidson College, a Somali expert. That's one thing
that's one of the things that Trump administration
is going to have to explain to its
constituency or or not because they don't care.
But the point is, this in 2017, troops
on the ground for what? Even at the
time, they were going, this doesn't seem to
make much sense.
K? 2017,
June. This is written by Midpress News. America's
shadow war in Somalia gets a fresh start
under Trump.
Not long before Donald Trump took his presidential
oath, the Obama administration was taking care of
unfinished business in a part of the world
that many Americans likely never think much about.
In Somalia,
a nation forced into a state of emergency,
thanks in part to an ongoing famine that
is being fueled by a covert US war
on terrorism.
It's this
consistency
to the belligerence of the way they respond
around the world. Now Americans didn't get much
insight into this because we weren't paying attention
largely because of how I mean, we a
lot has changed since then.
By the way, even just techno technologically,
my point is that we can see the
consistency of their saving people
turns into destruction and famine and civilian death
and some rate resource theft and World Bank
involvement, and, you know, some pretty much always
Israel.
That's what's going on. Like any other place
we could point to, it's transparent.
Obama made some of his final foreign policy
impressions by expanding the so called war on
terrorism there in Somalia
even as he reached the final days of
his last term in office, but it should
be noted that the US's interest in Somalia
has little to do with actual stopping of
terrorism and more to do with strengthening its
grip on the country's oil reserves.
In the early 19 nineties, US Petroleum companies,
Conoco and Amoco and Chevron and Phillips flocked
to Somalia to exploit their natural resources for
profit
just as many companies had done in Africa
before them. That's this is how this is
that's the
confessions of an economic hit band. Didn't that
we played that short clip the other day.
Like, that's how this works. It it used
to be just blatant because there was no
Internet. We weren't paying attention. Well, now it's
the same thing with a different narrative.
With the expansion of the US bases across
the continent, it's no surprise this exploitation has
continued.
Now, I mean, think about it like this.
If you got puppet regimes popping up, they
because they were fighting the democrat woke politics,
and all of a sudden, all they're doing
is placing their people in place around different
countries so they can exploit all the resources
and we miss it all because, yay, they're
not saying pronouns anymore.
That's how that works. Even if there's important
parts within that conversation.
Somalia is only one target of a much
larger, drone campaign that swelled under their Obama.
Now it looks like Trump may take this
campaign even further, and he did for the
most part, especially in light of statements accusing
Obama of not doing enough
to stop extremist factions in the country. Right?
That's Trump. So it's quite obvious. The point
is that, you know, the reality is it's
not about they're all on the same page,
guys. It's about like we're seeing today going,
Obama didn't do this or Biden failed on
that. So get get you
blindly stepping in a direction they want you
to go in.
In this case, he said that, but my
point is that you either he's lying about
it then to do that,
or he believed it would increase. And the
point is he did. He increased it. He
kept bombing.
Trump, who previously attempted to cloak his partisan
opposition to the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton
in loose anti war rhetoric,
has since become an even more hardened pro
war politician. It's likely that the US military
will expand its grip on the war under
his command with greater casualties not far behind,
which is true.
This is 2017,
July.
What are what you aren't being told about
the US' war in Somalia? One quick point.
Couple. It says, to put it simply, these
American troops deployed in Somalia that what didn't
barely got talked about. People many people have
denied it even.
These troops are not just advising and training
local troops. This is always what they try
to pretend.
They are also directly involved in combat missions.
Just like with Israel, by the way, and
every other thing we've told you, every location,
they always pretend, no. No. We're just advising.
It's not the case, like in Yemen, for
example.
As these clashes intensify, expect more American deaths
to come and expect further deployments.
Such deployments will also likely lead increased air
strikes because
the US
argues that such air strikes are needed
to defend their troops from Islamic militants. However,
even the New York Times called this out,
this circular reasoning. This is what we key
this is what they tend to use, and
Trump's using it all the time. In its
public announcements, the Pentagon sometimes characterizes the operations
as self defense strikes. Right? Who says that
all the time? Through though some analysts have
said this rationale has become a self fulfilling
prophecy.
It is only because American forces are there
on the front lines that they face imminent
threats. Right? So you put them there, then
you get to rationalize bombing because, well, now
they're in danger.
Sort of like occupying a location and then
bombing the people trying to take it back.
It says, to recap, the United States essentially
identified a group that poses no threat to
the US or Europe and targeted it with
drone strikes.
Drone strikes actually helped turn small insurgent groups
into a very formidable force due to the
instability these strikes create and the innocent lives
they take. It's blowback.
So continuing to remember where this goes, why
would they be doing this? Well, it doesn't
seem to be any real interest in them
other than the argument they're fighting the bad
guys that we know they're working with. Okay.
So what are they doing this for if
there's no real threat at the time? And
on top of that, which only seems to
grow the very problem that then used to
justify more of what they do.
It says
it says that being said, Somalia is allegedly
a transit point in a suppressed
supposed weapons route from Iran to Yemen
that supplies the Yemeni opposition with weaponry to
combat Saudi led forces in the war torn
out country.
Well, you see how we even back then,
we were trying to tell you that even
the Saudi dynamic with Yemen was Israel.
And it's the same dynamic because Saudi Arabia
is sort of a bulldog for both of
them.
In this case, now we can see because
Yemen has become a central part for Israel
now too. Surprise, surprise.
Funny if you go back and look how
long we've been calling these things out. The
point though is that now we can see
an interest for Israel in this dynamic. Where
okay. Well, we need to stop
that from happening. And how do we do
that? We occupy the territory, and we control
what happens.
Yep. Same old same old, guys. And it
says, in this context, Somalia's proximity to Yemen
means the North African nation is one of
those strategic maritime areas the US can't afford
to lose.
Somalia is also reportedly and which, by the
way, means at the expense of everything they
pretend they care about. Human rights,
civilians in general, everything.
Somalia is also reportedly sitting on a substantial
unexplo unexploited reserves of oil.
Consistencies everywhere. As well as about 25% of
the world's known uranium reserves.
No small thing.
Somalia's recently elected president, who was chosen in
an election paid for by the United States
and the EU,
is support supportive of American military assistance even
though his people are, in most cases, banned
from visiting the United States.
How transparently
stupid. It's obvious what's happening here, just like
they are doing it everywhere else.
Not literally everywhere where they are, but everywhere
else we've discussed that
they're deployed for and this is what their
objectives are, guys. These are what their objectives
are. Now November 2017,
the US has quietly deployed deployed more than
500 more troops to Somalia.
So the point is it just kept continuing.
We're only in the first well, twos 2
years in the Trump's administration. Now it's December
2017,
massacre in Somalia.
US troops to blame?
The point is we know this looking back,
but this is the evolution of it. Now
this is, this is from Ron Paul Institute,
and it simply says in August, 10 villagers
in Somalia were killed in a military raid
conducted by the United States and Somali troops.
According to a recent investigation by the Daily
Beast, they were killed by Americans. Now think
about how crazy it is to to write
about, to be so rightly concerned, but to
be 10 people
died. I mean, literally, Israel is killing 10
people every 15 seconds I'm talking right now,
and it it's all because of narrative.
Well, it doesn't matter. They they could argue
the same narrative right here. They were being
held by the bad guys, but they didn't
even try to make the argument. You know
why? Because they're not they knew that that
wouldn't fly.
But for whatever reason, the entire western establishment
pulled out all the stops to allow Israel
to make arguments they knew the world wouldn't
believe.
How do you make sense of that without
think seeing that they're being manipulated, compromised?
Now this was a show we did in
2019.
Just showing you the quick continuation of it
all, the US killing Somalians still in 2019,
which continued through by it's it's it's it's
not unique to left to right. The point
is to show you that it's not unique
to left and right, that both Biden and
Trump have done and continued the same thing,
or Obama.
And, also, let's not forget, back in 2019,
oh, weird, well before October 7th, UN urges
Israel to stop killing unarmed protesters.
Yep. But I guess they were UNRA all
the way back then, whatever that meant when
we didn't even talk about it. Right? No.
There was no narrative. They just nobody talked
about it because racism.
It's crazy.
Now this is today or rather 2,002
2024,
October.
Israel eyes, Somaliland base bid to counter threats
from Yemen's Houthis. Now Somaliland is just a
it's a specific location within the larger Somalia.
Look it up to get more into the
details. It's some kind of division between, you
know, a location declaring for itself, but it's
ultimately still in Somalia, which is an important
location for all the same reasons we just
discussed. Resources, geostrategic control,
and Israel wants it.
So now as these become more transparently,
you know, now that we can see the
Israel, Yemen on the surface of it, well,
they're coming and we need it, which they've
always been trying to accomplish it for all
the same reasons and others we pointed out
going back a long way. Even including the
Baaba Mandeb Strait, the control over the waterway,
the control over oil flow. All these things
are important with this, Suez Canal being controlled
by,
or is it,
no. No. It's the hold on.
To make sure I just don't
these names always, get mixed. It's not that.
It's the,
straight of, the Strait of Hormuz.
That's where Iran choke controls that choke point.
And they've always threatened if they ultimately
if something happens, that they'll close it down,
which will basically shut down the oil flow
from Saudi Arabia. And so for a very
long time, that's largely why they're in a
war with Yemen to control the other side
of it, which is the Baba Mandev strait.
In this case, I think Israel is making
it clear.
All of this. Is US' actions in foreign
policy are because Israel wants it.
Here's Middle East monitor from October 15th. Israel's
quest for strategic depth in the Horn of
Africa through Somalia.
Lastly, from the daily Shabbat, it says, sowing
chaos, Israel's influence in the Horn of Africa.
Right? It says Israel's fueling instability,
like everywhere else it seems, in the horn
of Africa, undermining peace efforts
between Somalia and Ethiopia. Right. So as they
try to stop them to the peace they're
trying to achieve,
right, then that gets used as the justification
for, oh, we have to be there because
they're not they're they're just a bunch of
animals and savages.
Right? Except you're the one pulling the strings
and forcing people into chaos like you do
in everything else, like you did in Rwanda,
like you do in in Bosnia, like you
do in every genocide we've seen. That's easy
to look up, by the way.
So much people choose to ignore.
I did an entire show on this because
it blew me away that it was that
obvious.
Was Israel involved in the Rwanda genocide? It's
yes. It's not just yes. It's provably yes
according to basically every testimony. It's very clear.
Not only they arm them before, during, and
after.
They were driving this into reality. That's not
some focused Israel point, guys. It's part of
the history you can easily look up. People
just don't talk about it because they're afraid
to be called racist. Same thing here.
Now the last part, it says, under Israel
spreading unrest, it says Israel already entangled its
in conflicts in the Middle East, has now
set its sights on destabilizing the Horn of
Africa.
This is the globalism of the this is
their imperialist
objectives,
the greater Israel and beyond. Everything they pretend
all of their adversaries want, which there seems
to be no indication of. Maybe they do,
but that's there's no evidence I can see
other than them claiming that as they literally
do it. And the US marches around the
world and puts bases everywhere and overthrows countries
and takes resources. But it's all the bad
guys that they want you to look at
that aren't doing that.
And they've now set their sights on destabilizing
the Horn of Africa. Israel is seeking to
establish relations with Somaliland because of its geostrategic
location and recent developments. Somaliland represents a valuable
intelligence hub and potential base for joint operations
for Israel.
So it's just funny how these things come
to pass, and now you can see quite
clearly what's actually going on.
Now quick other side note.
Interesting of the the relation to today. This
is from 2017, Ron Paul Institute. Why Washington
took Al Qaeda
in Syria
off the terrorist list?
That's Trump's administration, guys. That's 2017
and before, but this is when it happened.
So all those right now are trying to
pretend like it's all the bad stuff, and
Al Qaeda and ISIS, all the bad like,
right now, the point is no. That's Obama.
They're the ones that fund ISIS. No. It's
the government, guys, and they're all part of
it. And if you're blinded to these things,
you just that that's that's dishonest.
The truth is that they did this under
his administration. As always, you could pretend he
was played and tricked. But if you're gonna
do that, then you could play and pretend
that for any of them, Obama and the
rest. My opinion is that none of them
are. The reality is Hayat Sheryl Shamm
was the is the group currently in charge,
and here we can see where they got
pulled off so they could do this. Now
it says it might come as a surprise
to many Americans that their government does not
classify Al Qaeda in Syria as a terrorist
organization.
The reason it refuses to make the determination
would shock most people. The Syrian franchise of
the organization involved in 911 attacks on New
York and Washington has all which, by the
way, again, the bigger picture is clear, but
realize that that even that shows the our
proxy element working with Israel in the United
States. But it says, have gone by Jabhat
al Nusra, Nusra Front.
Vanessa Billi and I have talked about this
many times, and was sent to Syria
by the head of Al Qaeda in Iraq.
Okay? Baghdadi.
Then it says while Newsre maintained its status
as Al Qaeda's boot boots on the ground,
its work in Syria. It says in 2020
2015, the group decided to rebrand itself as
Jabhat Fata al Sham.
While as reported, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation continued
its incorporate to incorporate smaller organizations into a
structure. So continue to bring in more terrorist
groups. This is one of the reasons for
the failure of last year's secession of hostilities
in Syria.
The moderate fighters, otherwise known as the terrorists,
we can prove today, and the legitimate terrorists
were so so pointed to terrorist groups, all
of them, were so intermingled that it was
impossible for the US to separate them. But
the state department did not buy into the
PR makeover of Al Qaeda
and designated Al Shamm, the first one, Jabhat
Fattah al Shamm, as a terrorist organization. Right?
Then,
I'm sure you know what's coming, earlier this
year, and this was about 2,017,
Al Shamm's decided
to on a new rebranding.
Vanessa and I had an entire talk about
how loud, stupid, and obvious this was.
To name itself, guess what, Haya Hayat Terreer
Alsham.
HTS.
The leader of the new group is the
same old leader, and it's listed by the
US as a specially designated global terrorist with
a $10,000,000 bounty. That's the guy currently in
charge of Syria right now. But strangely enough,
the US has not designated the new one
as a terrorist group.
Why is that?
It's a good question.
It says, again, from from the Canadian state
agency, the reasons for the reluctance to list
the new the new group may have to
do with one of its new members.
A the it's the the the Zanki Brigade,
a a jihadi group from the Aleppo government.
The Zanki Brigade was an early and prominent
recipient of US aid weapons and training, like
all of them. It says for the US
to designate Hyattre Al Sham now would mean
acknowledging that it supplied weapons and tank and
missiles to terrorists.
Simple. Right? So it's not just that simple
though. That's just the way you can make
sense of it this time. Now that we
can see them being given command over Syria
and Israel building bases in Syria and publicly
telling you they're no longer ever gonna leave
Syria,
we know what's happening. And still people pretend
like we can't see this. And still Republicans
act like we don't know that they're working
with them. It's transparent.
Now with Tulsi Gabbard, like we just pointed
out, making the argument about how, you know,
reading Syria, Al Qaeda, and and and Hillary
Clinton's statements. Okay. Fine. I agree with that.
But you're currently working with administration that made
sure they weren't labeled and is currently working
with them in Syria with Israel.
So it's just all misdirection.
As long as you can point out she
said the bad thing about the Democrat, we'll
ignore the fact that they're all still doing
it.
We can't be this easy to manipulate.
Now on the Bebas family,
right, talking about the manipulations of these things
and realizing how obvious it is to use
transparent, like, lies that we can prove have
been building, that we know they're about to
use. I've been telling you they were gonna
do this for how long?
Over a year.
And here we are. Suppress News pointing out
as well on the 31st January saying Yartis
Bivas is being released tomorrow, that's today,
not knowing the status of the whereabouts of
his wife and his kids. If anything happened
to them, he that we will threats. That's
what people are saying, Israelis. Meanwhile, the reality
is that Israel killed them and refused to
take their bodies in December. You can prove
this, guys. The evidence is very clear now,
especially since he's been released. Okay? Now realize
that at the time, we made the same
argument. At the one of the earliest ceasefires,
pauses they called it. They tried to return
the Bebas family bodies, we told you at
the time,
and Israel refused to take them because they
they had a whole
propaganda campaign built around them being alive
because it was one of the only one
of the I think if not the only
example of children being taken. But they really
wanted to think like it was all these
children. No. Most of them were the girls
and men that were part of the IDF.
And who knows if they even plan to
take this or if it was some random
other Palestinian, they just owned it because they
they they knew they'd be blamed for it
anyway. Who knows? Nonetheless,
every single person that's been released has been
telling you that not only they treated them
well, but they even shielded their bodies with
their bodies to make sure the idea of
bombs did not kill them as best they
could. And this guy is on the record,
just like all the rest that have still
maintained their stories to this day. Now we'll
see if he continues to say it now
that he's out, that they were killed by
IDF bombs.
K. So this has been a plan.
Now this is the we show we just
did yesterday, 30th. Israel opens fire on released
Palestinians during exchange,
more than once, by the way. That's very
clear. No one's calling it out other than
independent media,
as well as violating the cease fire since
day 1 to now just like with Lebanon,
and continues to openly violate the cease fires.
Now just the comparison between the people that
they're releasing
is just sick.
High fiving, cheering, heart symbols,
not raped and pregnant, and all the lies
they were telling you, not tortured to their
own ex their own they're telling you that.
When they came out, they were treated well.
They gave us food and clothing, all of
them.
The guy it's hard to see in this
picture now, but this guy is emaciated,
beaten up, tortured, cuts and bruises, and has
scabies.
He got that while in the supposed care
of the Israelis.
By the way, taken when he was a
child,
not charged with anything, and now released.
After, what, 6 years?
That was what the rest that's what the
story was, guys. It's
disgusting. So we already saw this as well.
Again, this is not this is not the
one I showed you before where that young
girl got
shot at her back or rather shrapnel from
a bomb.
On 30th,
Israel deploys preemptive crackdown on celebrations
as Palestinians await free prisoners. Right. You can't
let them be excited about getting back their
family members because, god forbid, we show them
happiness because then it looks like we're failing.
That's the kind of petty, small mindset
of weak people.
And they did.
A preemptive crackdown on joy. Now
up till I started, which who knows if
any of this changed since, Israel has freed
a 183 Palestinians
after 3 captives released in Gaza.
Realizing that those are all people that they
have been holding in most cases for, v
indefinitely,
meaning just until they now release them with
no endpoint, then there's nothing there was no
charge. Administrative detention. That is the vast majority
we're talking about here. And then on top
of that, we have people that they then
scoop back already back up. That's already been
shown. There's one guy that got released and
then days later they grabbed him. That right
there is another violation of the ceasefire. On
top of that, they've scooped up probably more
from West Bank. And just like the last
deal they pretended, they did the same thing
but in Gaza. The days before, they were
arresting far more. And right after, we scooped
them all back up. That's why they put
it in agreement. They still violated it. So
right now, the point is they're arresting and
taking over the West Bank. Right now. And
it's the extension of the genocide. It's what
it is.
So this is it's it's a game. That's
how they're playing this. Nonetheless, I'm happy to
see these people getting released. I'm happy to
see some level of slowing down of their
genocide.
But here's the main thing of this, for
today anyway, because I we've been know we've
been seeing this build. Jerusalem Post shares this
12 hours ago. Yardis Biba is the father,
whose wife and 2 young children remain in
captivity. They know that's not true, guys. He's
now free, and he's telling you that that
they're not.
Reun reunites with his mother, father, and sister.
Welcome home, he says. So as of this
point, the information we have is still the
same. His family was killed in Gaza by
IDF bombs.
Okay? We shared this. This is just one
of them from October 25th.
And you could see
oh, that's right. This one doesn't have the
the subtitles. Basically, I I I might have
one.
Dang it. I don't wanna try to find
it right now. Oh, you know what? I
know where it is. I I'll be able
to find 1 in the in the thread
over here,
I think.
Point is that well, there's one that's got
subtitles. And he what he's saying is and
please verify for yourself. I've shown many times.
Is that they killed my family. And he
says, me Netanyahu, you're a monster or something
like that. What did you do? You killed
my family. Like, he's calling him out. We
we showed it the very first time we
got it. And what I've been disgusted by
is the fact that they've all continued to
use these children even though that's been reported
widely, and even the corporate media covered that.
They know what they're doing, guys, and it's
despicable. Yes. They never should've been taken in
the first place. But everything we've seen so
far shows that they've been taking care of
these people. Even if it was a crime
they were taking, they should still be held
accountable for that crime. 100%.
It's just hard to they want you to
be so outraged when you can see them
torturing, raping, and murdering, and starving to death,
and, you know, burning the holes in their
legs. The people that they have in custody,
they aren't even charged with a crime, who
are also, in many cases, taken while they're
children.
So here he is being released.
Doesn't seem to be emaciated.
But God forbid, they his head is shaved.
Which who knows why that happened at this
point. But of course, they're saying, we will
never forget or forgive what they did to
this man.
What then she's she's trying to abstractly reference
the fact that his family is hurt, gone,
killed. But she doesn't wanna say that because
I'm not sure where they're playing it just
yet. Are we still gonna pretend like they're
alive? Or are we gonna pretend like they
got killed by the by Hamas even though
none of that is true?
And people every one of these will never
forget all the things that you could post
beneath that that a far lot more than
shaving your head. Now realize that even he
has said in the video that they were
protecting him and them from these bombs. Numerous
people that have come home have told you
that they watch people die by IDF bombs.
Still say that. It is spectacularly
it's just crazy how much evidence there is,
and all we still get lied to by
radical manipulators.
Republicans, Zionists, and in some case, Democrats, mostly
western politicians and media.
But this is Muhammad Shahada telling you before
before on 24th. There's going a concerted effort
where they're going to use a campaign to
to blow up the ceasefire
using the Biba's family, even though they know
that they were killed.
They keep pretending not to know.
The reason the bodies weren't returned until now
is that Netanyahu refused to take them in
2023.
And so now the the point is, we're
getting to to the point today is supposed
to be the rest of the fam the
alive people.
And the women in control were supposed to
be the day the other day. So, already,
the if they were gonna make this argument,
it would have been that day. And the
last day is when the whoever the dead
body is supposed to come.
So if they which they're already seeing, like
Elon Levy and the rest. They're already making
this a case. So that is where I
think they're gonna make this case to say
they didn't return them, so violation.
And let's not
forget,
the Harrettes, Ynet News, people in the Knesset
publicly stated that Trump told them they could
violate the deal basically right now.
Getting into phase 2, they can violate the
deal. The Trump would back them up. I
mean, they're already taking the West Bank. That
was part of the deal.
Elon Levy, where are they?
I've posted this beneath him 100 of times.
And again, guys, it was a public story,
and I will show you this myself.
But this is
Adita
Juan's I don't know how to say this
name. But he says, Netanyahu killed all members
of the Biba's family along with other Palestinian
children, then refused to take them back when
they offered them. The only survivor was his
father, a prisoner who was released today. The
deal was offered in 2023, but Netanyahu refused
to choose and and chose to kill them
and 100 others instead. Imagine and watch this
horror video of your army. Adult male like
you in that building would definitely die too,
especially Beavis.
And and the the point is these are
all places where we're now they were being
held and built. They're just bombing everything, destroying
everything. And now look look at any picture
of Gaza. If you're gonna bomb 98%
of the entire location, then pretty sure you
don't care about the people that are hidden
and kept in that location.
This is the kind of transparently obvious things,
like basic deductive logic.
If they're bombing like they were, they're not
concerned about the hostages, guys. That's pretty effing
simple.
People like Ilham Levy have a job. Their
job is to use this family.
One of the most disgusting people in this
entire conversation.
One of the others
who people pretend I they claim is some
Indian guy that's being paid to do this.
That's certainly possible, but it's irrelevant. He's another
Zionist promoter saying
the Bebas family. Still still hostages,
he's saying. This is today. Or early this
morning, I think. Yeah.
The father came came out come home with
them.
The world silences deafening.
This person says, Hamas continue their cruelty and
torture of the Bivas family. This is their
way of saying, f you, Israel. We're still
in control. It's time to go back in.
Put an end to this and get these
babies home. You see what's happening?
Same thing. Now this is the say this
is the 31st.
Did the UN ever say his name? Yeah.
They did. Did the Red Cross ever say
his name? Yeah. They did. Did any world
leader ever say his name? Yeah. They did.
Did any mainstream media? Yeah. They did. Did
any human rights work? Yes. They did. But
who cares though? Right? You list it off
on Twitter, we can all pretend like it
wasn't they're just trying they're building a propaganda
narrative, guys.
And I posted this.
So if you quickly search for just TLav
and look be and look up the word
bebas, you can see how long we've been
talking about this.
This goes back to December 23, 2023.
Responding to Eli, or Eli David, which I
think I've got right here.
Yep. I think that's the one.
He has me blocked now, so I blocked
him back. But he blocked he blocked me
a long time ago because I was just
truly making a fool of him. I mean,
this guy is really he's not he doesn't
seem to be that bright, to be quite
honest. But here's what he was saying, December
22nd. Right? At a time when we already
knew this. This baby is still held hostage
by Hamas, and they refused to release him
in the hostage deal. Right? That was the
deal. That what we knew.
The the bodies were being presented, and Israel
refused. And so they put mister Moran here
to make this argument to set the camp
the propaganda campaign.
And I said they tried to return their
bodies after being killed by Israeli air strikes.
Israel refused. This is December 22nd I said
this. Hostages have confirmed IDF killed hostages to
keep that using them like you do ever
like you do everyone else.
This person responded saying, who told you that?
Hamas? Hamas are liars. There is a right.
There's a typical. Right? No. I I don't
blindly believing anybody. I'm saying you can look
at the evidence, look at what even the
corporate media reported, look at the people who
have come home and told you, yes. That's
what's
happening. Then what you have to do is
embrace the evidence versus a screaming narrative, some
idiot on Twitter.
Neither are definitive at this at that point,
but you still go, well, obviously the evidence,
but not screaming idiots like this. But I
said, I literally just said, again, the returning
hostages did as well as the Beba's father.
Only one person here is trusting anyone and
it's you. I don't trust either side. Right?
You get the point.
But see, if you go through, you can
see that what I've been doing is simply
posting this underneath anybody
or or captioning them.
Like a leave of Klompas.
Look at it. Why is there any it
says, why is this night different than any
other? It's all my people go. They see
these cartoons.
They've been they've been they knew what was
going on, and they still kept building this
narrative. They kept building this narrative.
It's it's the same similar people, but this
has built. And Dan Cohen
made the clear point that e in reportings
on the death of the Bebas family, even
CBS was forced to acknowledge they were killed
by Israeli air strikes, not Hamas.
Now just searching the word Bebas on Twitter,
you'll find it seems that most of them
are
me. But I just think it's interesting.
Right? I mean, it's just I mean, it's
like to such a sad and disgusting story.
Right? I just want people to recognize that
not only is this something that we have
been trying to show people this entire time,
showing you that we can recognize that they've
been doing this, that it gets no recognition
by anybody on their side despite knowing it's
the reality. Like, I'm talking from the Israeli
side. And so they know there these families
have been killed and they they still want
to use them. It's just like they still
pretend that that woman was raped even though
their evidence now proves that they that you
can not only that it didn't happen, but
they knew it didn't happen.
There is a profoundly sick society here in
regard to the Zionist influence.
That's what it comes from. That they will
convince people to lie about their own family
members.
It really is disgusting.
Now Mohammed says, Hamas will release the Biba's
family tomorrow, this was on the 31st, which
will indicate his family is unfortunately dead.
This is because the ceasefire agreement stipulates dead
civilian and hostages will only be released at
the end of the phase 1, and that
all living women and children will be released
before that. And this person simply shows you,
like, this was public knowledge.
This is November 29th 2023.
Hamas says 10 month old baby was killed
by Israeli bombings. Now, yes, I wouldn't blindly
take Hamas's word as much as I would
take Israel's word, especially since we know that
Israel funds Hamas. But it's still the public
evidence. Then we got the video. Right? Then
we got the coverage of it. Now point
is you at this point, especially now with
him out, you know the reality. The Guardian,
same thing.
There's Eli David.
Now, alternatively,
now quickly on that last point though. So
as this goes forward, guys,
it's gonna be very important what we see
come out from the propaganda side of this.
At this point in time, just like we
were saying, every single one of these people
that have come out have maintained what they
said,
which is the same thing. That not only
I mean, they were taken. So it's not
like it's this we're they're the best people
alive, but it's that they that they fed
me. They they talked to me.
They literally shielded my body when they were
bombings from Israel.
And that we saw my family die by
ADF bombs. Like, this is where we are
right now. And the narrative continues.
It's disgusting.
That means that just to have a clear
case, you're missing it, that means they don't
care about them. They don't care about their
own people, which should be pretty clear by
now. Now here is the alternative.
This is what people this is a Palestinian
prisoner hostage that was being released, Always in
their jumpsuit,
right, which which every other ones they release
are allowed to look in released indignity, right,
with their uniforms and whatever else.
This is a hostage and what they're doing
is they're they're holding their arms up around
over their head and pinching them. Even the
Red Cross came out, not me pinching them,
like, with their fingers, but, like, the pulling
it back so it's uncomfortable. Which, you know,
again, this is not some monumental thing, but
realize it just shows you the kind of
hatred and vitriol they have after torturing and
raping them while they're in prison. And it
says Red Cross workers expressed outrage as Palestinian
prisoners being released as part of the deal
are led with handcuffs above their heads.
So it's again, overall, you just continue to
see that these people are
more than vitriol. Like, it's just, like, mean.
Right? Just they there's that level of hatred
that they just want these people to hurt
when they're not even charged the crime.
On top of that, that everyone that wants
to make a case about a blow is
gonna say, well, there shouldn't have October 7
and dumb stuff like that. Despite knowing that
these people are doctors and random civilians, which
is what we're now finding out,
and we already knew for the most part.
But Jeremy Scahill pointed out, as we showed
you before,
more Palestinian captives are dying in custody.
This has been continually happening.
It's not happening alternatively in Gaza. Why is
that? Oh, except IDF bombs where they're killed,
and they keep telling you that. You realize
there's not one person that's come back that
said these people were killed by Hamas?
How is that possible with all they've been
telling you? They're gonna be raped and pregnant
and tortured. Nope.
None of them. Funny how that worked out.
It says in one case, Israel has reportedly
told lawyers they could not speak to their
client because it was an interrogation.
Turns out he died 6 months before that.
Check it out for yourself. As always, drop
site news doing great work. Source material there
for you. Now lord Bebo has this thread
you could look at that just shows you
a bunch of these different parts of this.
As usual,
out in the public,
in the sun, waving.
Right? I mean, just it's that's not to
say he didn't have his own trials and
tribulations. But the point is, he does not
look emaciated. And everyone of them are telling
you the same, and I'll show you next.
Positive things to say about these people.
The children, they're basically, you know, cheering them
on. Now this is interesting.
These papers were signed by the prisoners released
by the by Khaseem Brigades,
include a pledge not to return to service
in the occupation army,
or participate in the war on Palestinians and
the massacres against women and children.
But I guarantee they're not gonna abide by
it. You could argue it's in duress. Right?
So it probably wouldn't apply. But it's interesting.
Then it says oh, where was that? Right
here, it says, Kassim fried fighter puts his
gun carefully on the table to sign the
documents. So not only are they signing him,
the the the the the prisoner's being released,
but they're
Hamas is signing it.
Isn't that crazy to think about? Do you
see Israel signing pledges not to hurt anybody?
Like, it's just it's like, not not that
we we should even believe it'd be real,
but it's still an interesting symbol that Israel
just continues to show you what they really
are and then demand that you think they're
not. It's wild. And
I've already seen comments about, look, he put
his gun. He pointed at everybody.
There's so many dumb people out there that
just wanna make every small thing. You know
why? Because they all their major claims about
all they said were happening are showing to
be false, so they gotta pick out what
they can. Oh my god. They made him
wear a necklace. Oh, look. He made her
hold the gun. That was an old one.
Right? They're all smiling with thumbs up. Terror.
I think Fetterman made a big deal about
that.
Overall, they show that Bebo's family being released.
Saying Yaris Biba is with his father and
sister. His wife, Shiri, and their children are
not with him. Kasim previously announced that his
family died during this bombing. And as far
as I could tell, that's being maintained right
now.
Now, funny enough, you know, just the ongoing
overlap to this. Just showing you all the
different people and, you know, just look at
the contrast, guys. It's just transparent between what
you're seeing, people released from Israel and people
that are coming out released by Hamas.
Here's what you're seeing.
He writes he points out that their former
Israeli captive, God, Emoses, his son, says his
dad was treated with respect and lived in
the same conditions as his captors.
It says he was provided with books and
reading glasses. Yeah. What monsters?
Again, I'm not trying to diminish the reality
of taking POWs in the middle of a
conflict. But at what war has that not
happened?
The US has done it countless times. So
if we're only gonna pretend like it's a
big evil terrorist thing because it's a group
you don't like when they're objectively treating them,
I mean, with international law.
What am I missing here? You can't just
keep screaming all these dark, dangerous narratives when
it's not adding up in front of you.
Even if they're just
choosing to not do the things because they
wanna make them look like they're not. The
point is they're still not doing them. And
here we are. We're we're watching people come
out beaten, tortured, raped, and mutilated from Israeli
prisons, many of them not even charged, many
of them arrested while they were children, over
and over and over. And then every one
of them has come out and said things
like this on the other side.
You just can't ignore this. The thing that
scared him the most was Israeli bombardment. His
son is saying this. That's from Hebrew Walla
News.
And, the link, I have it right here.
Translate. And as always, there's a little bit
of weird translation with Google and probably intention
intentional.
But it it goes on to say, argue
these captives about, you know, who owns Israel.
I said, interesting. If you read it, it
wasn't like a big or they were having,
like, conversations about it. About why they own
it versus them. But if you read the
basic points,
it says throughout this captivity period, which was
essentially alone, Capricorn sought ways to relieve the
boredom. One of them was conversations with his
captors discussing Islam and political matters.
I mean, just if you lot watch any
engagement with Israeli, Zionists, with anybody, it's hatred,
violence, and anger all the time. They wouldn't
in converse. They'll yell things they want you
to think. And if you speak wrong I
mean, we've seen these videos.
They share them themselves on their own social
media.
They they'll eventually probably be looking at it
from a from a cell. Right? But it
says, after being handed books about Islam and
the environment, he found it difficult to read
them without glasses, so they gave him glasses.
In the absence of electricity, Capricorn used to
go to sleep at the sun level and
get up before rising around 3 AM. He
sometimes heard the bombings of Israel, some of
which he were close. He said it was
very scary for him, his son said in
the first interview.
Says most of the time, he was treated
with respect.
Hear this, guys. When they ate this is
a Hebrew media from Israel. When he ate
when they ate when they ate, they when
he ate, they ate with him.
We hear that with every one of them.
The women especially. It says he felt no
fear except for a few moments. Most of
the time, there was boredom.
God forbid I mean, god. Do you know
how many people in in Israeli prisons would
give anything to feel bored instead of what
they went through?
Capricorn heard about the deal in that that
was in November, and he knew names of
kidnappers who were released. I think that means
the kidnap to the translation issue. He was
ex ex excited for them to to come
home to come out. Wanted to, of course,
but happier for them, he said. He came
back much better than he could have imagined.
Yeah.
Because they've been told they're raped and tortured,
and they come back and they're smiling,
and they're fed.
But it's they they they can't help but
try to frame it like this is the
caveat. It's not. It's consistent.
Now here, Tim Anderson shares this. Is it
says eyes open. Former Israeli POW speaks about
the people from Gaza.
Now it says, listen carefully.
And it's in Hebrew. You can look at
for yourself. These woman praised those who took
her hostage. Now it says, what I saw
there was more shocking.
It
says then than the prison itself.
I no longer care about being a prisoner
because I realized something
that never crossed my mind.
These people will not retreat.
They will not leave
the matter easily, but they will not leave
it ever.
I heard them say that despite
the news of death around them,
despite the loss of their loved ones, they
used to say even if we all died,
even if only one child from us remained,
we would not surrender.
That's because they're resilient, and they're fighting for
their homeland, and they're fighting for their own
self determination.
And it says, and if we finish another
or finished another generation will come with the
same fate, and perhaps with
a stronger faith.
They love to try to make it about
terrorism, guys. It's just not. That's why she's
speaking with respect. It says, when I heard
that and I saw their eyes
and saw their their strange trust,
I realized the scary truth. These people do
not care about death. They do not fear
it, but it seems that it is part
of their beliefs, part of their history.
They used to say in their holy book
that motive that motivates them
there when I understood this truth, I began
to think inside myself. We must end so
we must
end is that what it says? We must
end a find a solution to this
to this war.
Says we may have to surrender.
We may have to look for a way
to peace
because they are simply not we we are
simply not the strongest side.
It says, I say this after I have
seen everything.
This was my conviction now, and this is
why I speak honestly.
They hate this. Israeli government hates this. I
used to think that would that we would
face
people who could defeat
them, who we could face people we we
could defeat them. But I
am now sure that they will never be
defeated.
And despite all this, I used to think
that they would attack me, they would humiliate
me, they would hurt me.
But the shocking surprise
was that they did not touch me badly.
I do not know why. As in, like,
other than grabbing your arm and, you know,
move even that, it seems like they're, like,
very careful, which every one of them had
told you. It's not my opinion.
So the bottom line is, guys,
that
it's I think of it, like, as an
American. Right? If you're in the United States,
American revolution
or defending your homeland, it's the same conversation.
To act like it's terrorism just because you
would die to to to to fight against
the enemy, that's what you would do too
if defending your country.
But apparently, it's only a bad terrorist boogeyman
thing when they've got brown skin and live
in a different place in the world.
The history is transparent.
Here,
Zachary Foster says over the past 2 weeks,
something remarkable has happened.
All the people who cheered on as Israel
killed dozens of its own hostages and prisoners
of war in Gaza over the past 15
months, all the while opposing a hostage ceasefire
deal. All of these people are now celebrating
the release of the Israeli hostages and prisoners
of war. In many cases, actually claiming the
Thai, release
as something Israel achieved even though Israel had
no part in it. Hamas made a deal
with the Thai government, and Israel tried to
claim it as their success. It's just lay
it's disgusting, these people, these Zionist manipulators.
But it says, all these people are now
celebrating the release.
It says, you people did everything in your
power to condemn the lives of Rami, Godin,
and the people that were released.
And now you're celebrating the release?
You're a bunch of 2 faced, shameless cowards
who love death more than life. He said,
I'm speaking to the 95% of Jewish Israelis
who, as of January
2024 poll, supported the continuation of the war,
supported the annihilation of Gaza, knowing full well
that every bomb dropped on Gaza was equally,
if not more likely, to kill the hostages.
How long have you been saying this? This
is objective fact.
It says over the past 15 months, Israeli
Jewish society has become one of the most
cowardice societies in recorded human history. Now be
clear, he is not speaking to Jewish people.
He's talking about specifically the Israeli Jewish society
that is controlled by Zionism in the state
of Israel, which is not representative of Jews
around the world, despite what they love to
push. There's a lot of orthodox Jewish organizations
that will tell you that. That does not
represent us.
Here's another one. Ryan Raspiani points this out.
And it's just a kind of a visual
overlap. There's music playing in the background. Look
at the stark difference between the returned Palestinians
versus the the Israeli prisoners.
This one, before after.
Quite a big smile.
And then there's this guy.
Before,
after.
I don't know how you can pretend this
is not the most obvious thing in the
world. Again, I all I think we're speaking
to the majority of the world anyway. I
think you guys all know this. Only a
bunch of very, very
influential manipulators
controlling governments and in and media that are
making it appear. Are you screaming you down
for being racist when you're literally pointing out
government action?
Look at that, guys.
That's the reality. Everyone we've seen are are
emaciated and tortured, bruised, and terrified. Some of
them that guy couldn't even remember his name.
He was so traumatized.
Not this guy not this not this guy,
but the other one we showed you that
came out, like, clearly, like, psychologically traumatized.
We're we're supposed to be remember, the guys,
not only do we see that the on
video,
Israeli
being raped
Israelis raping
prisoners.
And they debated how they should be able
to do that on their live TV shows.
But it has come out through human rights
groups that they use dogs to rape them
while they're in there. I know that's a
horrifying discussion, and I I don't wanna talk
about it as much as you don't wanna
hear it. But that's been reported
numerous times by human rights groups.
Why do you think they're traumatized?
A few months later,
he died
due to abuse and negligence. Guys, that's the
reality. Even though he was released, he died.
That's what's going on in Israeli prisons.
Remember, this is what's going on with Hamas.
Every one of them so far.
Now the ceasefire agreement, let's not forget,
was, as we said, on 15th before it
even started because they were telling you this
if you had the ears to listen, if
you simply looked anywhere other than controlled media.
The Israeli government was saying this. Israeli media
was saying this, that they were given the
agreement to break the deal on the second
phase. Trump said so and gave them the
right to go after West Bank, which they
already did. Mary Madison gave him a lot
of money for that. That was her stated
reality. Remember that?
That she gave him the $100,000,000, which I
think is now over $200,000,000
so she could annex the West Bank. That's
Harrettes telling you, it wasn't a secret. Just
as always, this weird dynamic where the western
media and the western government go, what? I
have no idea. I I have to look
into that. There's no evidence I've seen. That
sounds racist.
Like, Matt Miller style. You know, just blatantly
ignoring the facts. Well, we'll investigate.
Molossov MD again points out, now that every
single female IDF soldier's out of Gaza, because
they are, has anyone been able to confirm
any pregnancies?
Israel's readies for hostages to return pregnant. Matt
Miller even pushed that lie.
And they're all using the pants with the
blood in the back, and now that's as
we already knew. But it's now been even
further confirmed that, one, she wasn't raped, and,
2, they had video that proved that it
was her ankle and her and her hand
and her wrist that caused the blood on
the back of the pants, and they still
lied about it. And all these screaming manipulators
online or that even some that didn't know
any better were just well, think about it
like this. There's p other people that knew
they were lying or people that were willing
to push the lie when they knew they
couldn't prove
it. Just because they chose to take at
face value what Israel said. That's stupid, guys.
That's ignorant.
There's a lot of that today.
And this the same point as always.
Even if it turned out to be true,
taking it at face value before you knew
that just because they said so is still
ignorance.
Now this one is the this is lip
shit. This is the very first person
I actually forget if she was IDF or
not.
In any case, I don't think she was
active. So let's let's go ahead and call
her hostage. The point is that she was
released first,
and it destroyed their narrative. She said they
were kind. She said they treated her well.
And they and Israelis attacked her for it.
They literally you know why? Because that's not
what you're supposed to do. You're supposed to
lie for the government, like they all seem
to wanna do.
Remember, all the lies, all the people that
randomly came up and were, like, yeah. I
saw that guy raping her. I saw them
kick the head around like a soccer ball.
Nope. Those were all proven to be false,
and they lied about it.
Why? Because somebody told them to do it.
I mean, you could think about it threats
and so on, but, you know, what does
our government do? Do it for your country.
People fall for that.
But in this case, all the Israeli detainees
said at their release.
And apparently, only one has not continued to
say that. That's an interesting way to think
about it. Or to to see it and
understand it.
All of them came out saying that they
were treated kindly. Only one of them has
then suddenly changed tune, like, months down the
line. I forget her name. And Noah, I
think, is the longer haired one. But the
point is how why I mean, think about
how all of them have said the same
thing, including her. And then she changes it
into a kind of a bombastic narrative of
how they abused her,
and everybody else still saying how does I
think it's pretty obvious that she was convinced
a lie. But you decide for yourself.
This person
and again, the point is that they, they
all of them maintained they were fed, medically
cared for, and treated kindly by Hamas. And
yet, the desperate atrocity propaganda continues.
Even parroted by mainstream media and mainstream alternative
media to this day. This
is Lipschitz.
Oh, this is the first the one I
showed you earlier
saying it says she was taken half naked
on October 7th because she was dressed that
way. And it says, what did Hamas do?
Oh, I think you can hear this one.
Hold on.
The point is they covered her just like
the Beba's mother, by the way. They literally
covered her. They covered her head.
And despite despite people wanting to make that
into some weird repressive thing, it's about it's
technically about respect. It's about the idea that
you're I mean, you know, the point is
they wouldn't care about that if it wasn't
supposed to be their wife. They did it
out of respect. And here is that video.
Even if they didn't have that intention,
now they might have and I'm half naked
so
you're worried about rape? Yeah. Yeah. I was
worried to get raped. Yeah. Of course.
And fortunately enough,
they didn't do it. She was given a
hijab that covered most of her body.
I got a very strong feeling.
This is my that
that fabric is my only
protection.
Oh, I don't care then. K. Right. I
mean, it's completely fair. I mean, like, even
if they had no intentions of it, even
if the majority bulk of them felt it
was somehow religiously wrong, like they're telling you
and have clearly done and made that that's
been proven, there kills there could still be
someone who doesn't care about that. There could
be a person that's not part of the
group. I mean, it's not this should never
be diminished.
The risk and the fear, 100%, guys. That'd
be terrifying.
Especially if you're a woman around a bunch
of men. It's it's just reality. But it
didn't happen. That's what matters. And at the
end of the day,
all of them are treated the same way.
Covered, treated that way. Cal and and there's
been cases where videos, we can see that
they even tried to sell you as being
something else where the guy is saying, don't
touch them. You're not allowed to touch them,
like, very clearly.
Oh, and so this one doesn't this one
says,
it's forbidden for them to touch us. I
was just saying that. It says women are
sacred. Women are like queens. That's what she
said.
Literally told her mom they because they treat
women like queens. That's what she said.
There's right here.
Oh, I was missing the bottom. That's what
I was doing. Okay. There it is. It
says,
you and I you and I played and
then I won. It says because Anjum was
exercising.
It says, at the time,
they said,
if if Hin beat her, then we would
play too. Then a young man from them
did arm wrestle with me,
but he brought a towel.
Why a towel? Because it's forbidden for them
to touch us. So they're they're hanging out
with them, playing games with them.
And it says, for them, women are sacred.
They talk to me about how to look
after a jam.
We told them that
sometimes
we have friendships
that my daughter Ajam might have a friend
or that she might have several
friends before she gets married. And I also
encourage her to do that. So I'm not
even sure the relevance is that she can
get to know and learn before she gets
married. And then she says and we would
argue that so she's talking about their own
personal life. But the point is the same.
And it's just she says the same to
this very day.
That they treated her with respect. That they
they see women as sacred.
I just don't know how people could ignore
all of
this. And she wasn't raped. She wasn't abused.
Lifshitz says,
when we arrived there, they first told us
that they believe in the Quran,
and that they wouldn't hurt us, and that
they would provide us
with the same conditions
that they have in the tunnels.
And they took all of our needs, took
care of all of our needs. I'll give
them credit for that. They were very courteous.
They made sure we were
clean and that we ate,
and we ate the same food they did.
Consistency
from the very first person to the today.
Think about how desperate this must be for
the Israeli manipulators.
Now as the squirrel points out, Trump's plan,
which is
which is actually
the plan of his Israel lobby genocidal Zionist
handlers who own him, that's what he says,
is to complete the Gaza genocide after the
first two phases of the ceasefire gets the
Israeli prisoners out by cutting off all the
essential aid and starving out the people as
they sell it as voluntary migration.
We'll get Trump already said he's gonna be
they're gonna be displaced.
So you have to think about this. If
if they once this is what we've been
saying from the beginning. Even if they get
all their people back, the point is they're
still in a controlled location where Israel can
take them all back. Even though they signed
the piece of paper, they clearly aren't following
it. So once this happens, Israel can just
gonna go back to doing what it wants
and they already have the green light from
Trump.
It is just just unnerving, guys. It says
Israel yesterday banned UNRWA, and I'm I'm not
I'm not gonna get to today. I put
it off, but it's same thing we've talked
about, same story. The right of return, and
they're just banning them, and which is the
only way they're gonna get any support. And
it says, which plays a key role in
supplying and administering essential services and goods from
food to health care to education. That's the
first part of the plan already enacted.
Getting rid of it. Steve Witkoff is a
lifelong fanatical Zionist who sees Israel as his
true homeland.
All those reports about him playing hardball with
the Israelis is BSPR, he says, that is
used as part of the genocidal campaign to
fully annex Gaza and the West Bank. Settle
like the 2 party illusion. Like, they use
these false binaries all the time.
Just yesterday after his visit to Gaza, which
consisted of a quick embed tour with the
IDF, Witkoff advanced this agenda by saying Gaza's
now uninhabitable.
Yeah. Gee, who told you that? As every
day we were saying stop them, stop them,
they're destroying all of Gaza. No. No. You're
racist. They're just getting rid of Hamas.
You know, this is my point about it.
Who doesn't see this? Who is not smart
enough to look at that and go, oh,
well, they were lying. Obviously.
Only manipulators, guys. The only people who don't
see that are people that don't look and
only watch what they're supposed to because they
follow partisan media or people that are dishonest.
I'm of the mind that the vast majority
is aware of this right now because it's
everywhere.
It says, and lying that people returning to
the north were going back south. It says
after they go like that was because they
were not allowed to go to the north.
They were shooting at them, guys. It says
after they have have have made which by
the way, don't forget, that was an agreement
for the ceasefire to go back to the
north, but they never intended to allow it.
No one the media, not the US government,
have said a word about shooting children and
breaking about 6 different parts of the ceasefire.
No. I don't even think I mean, I
haven't been following the Hamas statements, but not
in the last so many days. But I
bet you they're saying something, but I haven't
seen it.
I just say it's interesting that we're not
seeing
the obvious points.
You know, as a matter of fact, if
Hamas did anything, the entire conversation would shift
into they broke the
fire. After they made Gaza actually uninhabitable by
cutting off all essential services supplies,
They will goad them all to the border
with Egypt, then create a media spectacle about
how Egypt is being un inhumane and evil
by not opening the border
as they add pressure in the background to
their puppet, Sisi, to open it or they
will cut off all military and financial aid.
I bet you'll be much easier than that.
I bet Sisi is a, where's my favorite
dictator?
Trump literally said that in the oval oval
office. This is a guy who was put
there by them. That,
mostly people don't support in Egypt.
Because he's pro Israel and they're not.
But it says that and there's a lot
more than that. But it says at the
same time, they will do the same thing
with their puppet in Jordan and create some
sort of agreement where the population will be
divided. This is opinion. But it says this
is the plan. Largely, I agree. He says
whether or not it will work is uncertain
at this time. Several very important factors can
lead to its failure. People in Gaza's well,
let's I think it's for time we can
leave the pipe. I think what he's saying
there is where this goes. I believe that's
what's happening.
Now, here's what Trump just said in regard
to that exact point.
Again,
stating what we all told you was gonna
happen. I don't mean, like, some variation of
it. Like, literally what we said. Exactly what
we said the plan was and the entire
thing pushed back. Not true. Not gonna happen.
That's racist. We're only fighting a mosque, human
shields, and here we are.
That it it is absolute think about it
for Palestinian, like, how frustrating this must be.
And then,
obviously, that takes the cake. But realizing just
anybody else that we're over here going, guys,
this is happening. Here it goes. Look at
him go. No. You're wrong. And then 10
seconds later, those same people who said you
were lying about it now going, this is
why it's at both. This is the good
thing. This is why it's gonna it's gonna
help them.
Oh, you mean the thing that you just
got done telling me is not gonna happen?
Where'd that middle ground go? Can you not
at least take a moment to go, oh,
looks like that was correct. But now let
me tell you why it's right. Nope. That's
not how partisanship works, guys. You just follow
along like a blind
something insulting. Here's what he said.
With efforts to reduce the Oh, wait. That's
not it.
See right there. That's crazy. If I pull
back the video, I should be on the
screen.
I don't know. Maybe StreamYard is just messing
with me. That's so stupid.
God, so stupid.
So
I swear I'd grab that.
I guess not.
All he's saying here
is that they will go. It's a short
clip, but it's worth hearing him say it
because there's they're they're you know, it's this
typical kind of crip cryptic answer,
which suggests that there's more to it and
lets you read into whatever you wanna read
into it. But all he's really saying in
my opinion is that they have something. We
have we have some way to force this
into reality, just like he was just saying.
The president
and the king of Jordan have both said
that they, won't take in,
displaced people from Gaza like you suggested.
Is there anything you can do to make
them do that? I mean, tariffs against those
countries, for example?
I they will do it.
They will do it.
What makes you say that? They're gonna do
it.
Okay? We do I just I'm is that
that's not cool, man. Like, that's not that's
not, like, some kind of cool answer. Like,
that's stupid.
That's not what they yeah. Get it, man.
Get to the point. Like, he he likes
to make himself some kind of, like, mystic
background, like, they'll do it.
God. Under control. And the reason he does
that is because all the followers are gonna
read into whatever the new Kupo says about
what he actually meant, the way he scrunched
his eye a certain way. And now we
know.
It's stupid. It's assumptive. It's ob it's not
it's subjective.
Overall, the point is maybe he doesn't have
any plan. Maybe it's Israel told him to.
And the point is, at the end of
the day,
not saying that, not, well, they'll do it,
is more alarming than not
because all you're really doing is showing that
you're you've got some secret manipulative plan. That's
the and what you're discussing
is literal ethnic cleansing,
which is honestly probably why he doesn't go
into detail because legally speaking, this is a
cry a war crime.
But it's not new to him. He's done
it before.
Against those countries, for example?
They will do it.
What makes you say that? They're gonna do
it.
Okay? We do a lot for them, and
they're gonna do it.
Right. So we'll make we're gonna force them,
basically. Because that's what we do. Right?
Freedom, liberty, and we'll make it happen no
matter what because we get what we want.
Freedom.
It's just so stupid. And by the way,
I just think it's funny
that he's he's what is this why does
his hair look white right there? It looks
white, which kinda makes him look like an
Oompa Loompa, like, with his dark it's weird.
Like, it's not like I'm trying to insult
him. It looks there's something strange with that.
Like, the way he looks, it looks odd
to me. Like, he's got, like, a
extra dark tan there with white hair. Like,
is this the camera? They don't feel like
his hair looks like that elsewhere. I just
thought that was strange. Maybe CNN's doing that
to make him look stupid. That wouldn't surprise
me.
So
ethnic cleansing. The organized often violent attempt by
a particular cultural or racial group to completely
remove from a country or area all members
of a different group.
By the word definition.
It's sick to me that we can't we
there anybody,
for any reason, is politically motivated to pretend
that they're not doing what we all know
they're doing.
Suppressed news. This guy, open source intel, says
Trump confirms Egypt and Jordan will take and
Palestinians.
No. He didn't. He said we'll force them
is what he said. But he goes, yet,
instead of Palestinians protesting against leaving, it's Egyptians
protesting against them coming. What does that tell
you? It's the same thing. It's the same,
basically paraphrasing some old Hitler Nazi speech about
Jews. It's saying it's exactly what they're doing.
And the reality is you're trying to make
it out to be that they're all grotesque
monsters and that's why they won't take them,
which, by the way, is what we've always
told you they all think.
They when you when you push them, no.
No. It's only Hamas. We're trying to save
the Palestinians from Hamas, But then everything else
you say makes it clear that you think
all Palestinians are bad. You guys are ridiculous.
In fact, you're bad at this because what
you're doing is showing people who you actually
are. Racist, disgusting bigots that support racial apartheid.
But Suppressed News says this open source, no
intelligence has to be blocked. So both Egypt
and Jordan have rejected Trump's statements, and Palestinians
themselves opposed displacement, which is why they remain
rooted in their land despite everything Israel's done.
Regarding the protest in Egypt, it's not against
Palestinians
coming coming, but rather against Trump's plan to
ethnically cleanse them. And if you actually take
a second to listen, which I know he's
not interested in because he's a Zionist propagandist,
they'll tell you that. And it says no
one has an issue with legally accepting Palestinians
while preserving their right to return to their
land. A right that Israel denies and prevents.
The moment they leave, they're never going back
because it's not Gaza.
Right? They'll there it's not the Palestine is
gone at this point.
They're taking Gaza. It's been flattened. They're already
blowing up the West Bank and arresting people,
guys. So once they kick them off the
land, they're not gonna let them back in.
They've already told you that. And that's the
whole thing, is people like open source here
act like they're supposed to leave because they
don't belong there. Like, think about how gross
this turn is, where now they're acting like,
you know, it's it's it's
the same old false history of of Zionism,
of all of it. They're just conflating everything
and acting like they are owed everything
even though it was given to them by
a government because that's exactly how you it's
think about trying to pretend this was a
God gave them to them when you can
prove that it was the Belfort declaration that
the Israel that the UK government literally gave
them. And they were deciding between multiple locations.
All historically proven,
but yet somehow we just pretend even people
in congress today pretend like it was God.
Doesn't that scare anybody? Like, and and I'm
a religious person. That makes me scared because
either they actually think that, which means they're
willing to act
politically for what they religiously believe, which is
crazy. That's where you get the worst things
in history.
Or they know they're lying about it and
are willing to do that for
Israel. That's the world we're in right now.
And
it says, why what Egyptians, along with the
rest of the world, oppose is a forced
displacement of 1,500,000
Palestinians from Gaza, which is ethnic cleansing
and illegal under international law. No matter what
narrative you put on it, guys.
Arab nations reject Trump's suggestion to relocate Palestinians
from Gaza to Egypt and Jordan,
but they don't care. They're gonna strong they're
gonna strong-arm it and call it democracy.
And guess what? If they don't do it,
they'll probably replace them as leaders.
That's the world we live in right now.
It says Israeli UN envoy warns of Egypt's
military buildup.
Why all the submarines and tanks? Now this
is January 31, 2025.
While Egypt has played a central role in
a mediator between, Israel and Hamas, Danan's words
highlight a growing trust gap between the two
nations.
They're not on the same side. K? They're
forcing this in. The reality is and I
mean, not only that. The point is they're
literally
expecting there to be some kind of conflict.
So overall,
this is about them being imperialists, being authoritarians,
forcing what they want even with their allies
because that's who they are. And we're supposed
to pretend like this isn't transparent, that they
aren't they aren't like the villains of the
world, forcing people against their own interests, their
own will, their own people's interests for what
they want at the expense of everybody, including
you, including half the time parts of their
own government. They don't care.
Right now, it's in fact, I think, exactly
that. That it's against the interest even of
their government, of everything they might want. They've
been building a narrative around rules based order
and all these things, and they just destroyed
it all to fight for Israel's greater reset.
Then you got a bunch of very, very
uninformed people screaming about how it's all about
woke politics and how we need to fight
for Israel. Now Abir points out that she's
honestly speechless about this. And this is the
same Oren Barsi guy who got caught multiple
times lying, but
even fact checked by Twitter for lying about
food being everywhere in Gaza,
and yet it was proven that what he
was pointing to was a bakery that was
destroyed weeks before he was pointing to it.
In fact, I might even have that.
Yeah. I think that's it right there.
See? He says there's no famine in Gaza.
It's funny how that you there's the, denying
well documented events is what YouTube says will
be censored. But of course, even though it's
well documented,
they're on a side here, and they don't
care. Or Twitter for that matter. The point
is, yes, there's a famine. And the leading
groups that dictate whether it is a famine
or not, like the ICPC,
are openly telling you that the vast majority,
and I mean, like, 70 plus percent are
in famine right now.
But he doesn't care because he's lying for
Israel. There's no famine. In fact, there's more
food than ever. And he shows this whole
thing. And, oh, guess what? Nope. They're widely
documented with some people resorting to eating animal
feed. And then it goes on to say
the bakery in the video was bombed and
destroyed in October 3rd October killing 3 people.
He's posting this
in February 2024. Now guess where he took
it from? Cogat.
Cogat, the group that's supposed to be coordinating
things for Judea and Samaria. No. This is
an Israeli propaganda group pretending
to facilitate aid while lying about enough aid
being there.
That's this is Kogod. They're the ones that
made this lie up and they're supposed to
be the ones that are feeding them. But,
no, it's in another Israeli extension of their
propaganda campaign. And they're starving children to death
while telling you they're being fed more than
ever. That's the guy we're talking about right
here.
That's him. And here's what he says. There
are only 2 possible solutions. 1, the denazification.
They're still calling them Nazis.
Not only ideologically
stupid, but while you're committing a genocide against
them. Like, how pathetic this all is? Of
the entire Palestinian society by placing educational cultural
oh, you mean, like, reeducation camps?
Yeah. That's what he's proposing.
To ensure education geared towards my god. But
then number 2, encouraging the return of Palestinians
to their historical places of origin, such as
Egypt and Jordan.
My god. While their grandparents originally arrived as
migrant workers.
I I I get it. I'm speechless. Like,
the fact that you can even like, you
can pretend, like, somehow you think you own
this from 35 100 years ago. But if
you're actually trying to pretend that Palestinians
came
by as migrants while you control the territory,
guys, I mean, this is wholesale from whole
cloth. Just completely false, like everything they do.
But you realize why this is happening now.
They're desperate.
They're losing.
Now maybe not in immediate control with the
US government lying for them, but the world
does not buy it anymore. They've lost control
of the narrative, at least everywhere.
So what do they do? Just like they
started with last time. Just start building the
fake narrative again. And then over the process
of 10 years, if they still control it
with the US, they'll force it in. They'll
force it in with their definitions around Zionism,
their definitions, and they'll censor you, and they'll
take your jobs away. And maybe over 10
years, they'll we'll all be quiet again. Who
knows? I hope not. That's what they did
the first time.
But here we are.
Now, here is an account called awesome Jew,
and it says, 100 of Egyptians protest near
the Rafa border crossing, waving Egyptian flags and
voicing their opposition to Trump's plan to re
relocate Egyptian. Yeah. You know, it's partly true.
They're against it because they don't want them
to be ethnically cleansed and they support them.
It's very clear. But they'll lie about it
because Zionists lie about whatever. And, of course,
making it about Jewish people so that you
inadvertently think you're fighting Jewish people so that
you then fall for the trap of Zionism.
That's how this works. Their concern is understandable.
Now, by the way that's what this continue
to say, by the way. But if you
if you look at their account
or any of these people,
you'll very quickly identify the fact that they'll
go after anybody, Jewish especially, if they're going
after the agenda. If they're going if they're
calling out Israel, or if they decide to
say Palestinians have lives that matter.
They will go after them like Ben Shapiro.
And so that just look for yourself. So
you can very quickly then identify Zionist versus
somebody who believes in Judaism.
So if you're going after anybody, especially Jew
Jewish people that are against this, then you
don't believe in actual Jew you believe in
Zionism,
Which is not the same thing. That's why
they're trying to create fake definitions with Trump's
antisemitism law, to make it against the law
to say that
a 100 100 of year old religion, you
know, or political organization is the same as
a 35 100 year old religion.
They think you're that stupid, guys. I know
you're not that stupid. But it says their
concern is understandable. They don't here's what he
says. They don't want violent terrorists in their
country. But ultimately, they have no choice. Trump
has determined to push the plan forward.
So as always, what he's showing you here
is that they think all Palestinians are terrorists.
Because what they're talking about is moving the
Palestinians,
not Hamas.
So what they're telling you, just as always,
is they think all of them are bad
and terrorists. So does Israel. It's never been
hard to see if you're just not lying
to yourself.
Now Sarah Abdallah points out that right now
in the Hague no. This was actually the
31st, but it's in going to today. It
says the blood has that that has been
spilled in Gaza on the hands of the
international community.
And in particular, those western countries that support
and and feed this genocide.
Special envoy of Belize.
This is an ongoing an ongoing point right
now in the Hague.
Group of Nash of nations calling themselves The
Hague Group
are are set to announce a raft of
legal, economic, and diplomatic measures against Israel. So
even as the feckless US government and the
UK don't do anything about this, There are
people collecting their power around the world, and
they are going to make something happen.
The global south is stepping up, it says,
where western nations have decided to go rogue
on international law norms. Of course, that's well,
I don't know. That's probably this first. I
let's not pretend like they went rogue. They've
always been rogue. We just finally are seeing
through the lies is my opinion.
Propaganda in coast is Israel is now being
sanctioned. Police, Bolivia, and this is as of
the 31st, Colombia, Cuba, Honduras, Malay Malaysia, Namibia,
Senegal,
South Africa explored collective actions at both national
and international levels to further the cause of
Palestinian Liberation. This isn't gonna go away, guys.
It's only a matter of time. I agree.
Sarah also points out And my thing is
the point matter of time until the US
government decides to recognize that it's not in
their interest to support Zionism anymore. Not that
they won't or that they won't have consequences
because they're all bought off and influenced and
blackmailed. But
clearly, at some point, the scales will tip.
These people are shameless opportunists, and they will
find that's what I that's what I'm that's
my point when we try to use that
against them.
Find the people that are lower on the
rungs and get them to go against this
because it's in their interest too. But still
question them. Don't trust any of them. But
it says, when future generations inquire about our
co our contribution
to Palestine's right to self determination,
our response must be, we took concrete measures,
or we will be remembered as leaders who
watched and did nothing. That's Namibia's minister of
justice.
Horetz put an article out on 31st.
New Zealand will now require every Israeli to
provide details of their military service to receive
a visitor's visa.
So you see, the world around, even vassal
states of the US empire are going, you
know what? These people are disgusting. Not all
Jews or Israelis. The murdering Zionists that are
committing war crimes and cheering about it and
posting it on TikTok in the IDF.
And so what they're saying is, if you
have if you're in service,
you we require that you verify that. It
says a genocide hotline has also been set
up by a local pro Palestinian group, and
Kiwis can now report IDF troops visiting their
country.
Now I'm sure you could argue there'll be
an overlap of an IDF troop that didn't
commit crimes. The point is the same, though.
Right now and this is this is historically
how this works. After the German military or
anything, guys, it ends up becoming a we
recognize that military was committing the crimes. So
that then becomes an issue.
It doesn't say they go to jail. Right?
But it does say that they provide details
of their service. So the, I think that
this is inquiring.
The point is the world is turning against
this because they should.
There could Israel's committing a genocide.
Now,
to roll this in to the next one,
there's one more segment here. But don't forget
we just talked about the pager dynamic. Right?
Israel's infiltrating US tech in the light of
the pager attack in Lebanon,
showing you that we're equally on unstable footing
with Israel having start ups and technological influence
across this country. So we very well could
be stacked with pagers and phones right now
that'll explode should they want them to. That's
not a crazy thing to think about. It's
terrifying, in fact.
And many times they allude to that on
interviews.
And that's the point we're gonna get to
here. So thinking about this well, I just
pointed this and it kinda I'm glad this
went kinda viral. Other people are seeing this
and pointing it out. I think APAC, Tracker,
and, Zionism observer made you know, really went
to town on this good because this is
pretty terrifying.
So keeping in mind this conversation about what
they just did
oh, actually, I forgot. This is,
well, I'll just briefly point to this. This
is interesting. It's about a 7 minute video.
Or no. It's, yeah. 7 minutes. It's wild
though if you listen to it. I'm I'm
gonna skip it for time. But it I
was right. He says, what did I just
watch? How has the world gone completely crazy?
Why are western countries allowing themselves to be
occupied and enslaved by these creatures?
And if you listen, this person is literally
sitting down with the Sweden Democrats or in
in with giving instructions to Sweden Democrats on
how to handle issues about Palestine. Now listen.
It'll blow your mind.
This guy, by the way, who sounds like
he doesn't have a second grade education is
literally walking her through how
to basically ignore the facts, to to to
go after Palestinian groups, and to, I mean,
it's wild. And she's writing writing notes down.
That is what we see around the world.
The Israeli influence that is controlling
out of fear of racism, I guess. It
does it's when when what they're doing is
telling her how to be racist against Palestinians.
But it is wild. We will come back
to that.
APAC tracker points this out. We just showed
you this the other day. Well, yesterday, I
think. Batar US.
It says, we hand out beepers.
1 of these students is is on our
list to deport
as
appears to be a student visa. Do you
realize that so Israel was already weaponized. It
Trump's discussion about visas and immigration in general.
Haven't we been telling you that? Then you
could argue it's just an overlap. I'm of
the mind that's what this is. This Israel
is using through the Trump administration to achieve
these goals in this country. He they're literally
showing either way, whatever you think about it,
now you've got these Israeli groups that are
saying, we're gonna deport you. Call ICE. Here,
take a beeper. To American students
and students that are on visas. In some
cases, they could tell they don't even it's
just anybody.
And they just go, well, are you a
visa? They don't even know. They're going after
Americans in most of these cases. Where's the
American government?
Right? Where's the Stephanics and the Cottons of
the world that care? Oh, I thought you
cared about Americans. Oh, but I guess because
they're Israeli Americans, you don't care now.
Shouldn't this matter more than anything? That you
got Israeli entities or any entity from a
foreign government or anybody
threatening them with potential pager bombs or targeting
them for harassment.
Israel used beepers to commit terror attacks. Now
Zionist organizations are taunting American citizens
by offering them beepers, suggesting they'd be blown
up. This is terrorism.
Now realize, we'll come to it in a
second,
as we keep proving, despite people pretending it's
not true, even
illegal immigrants, in most cases, are protected under
the constitution if they're in this country. Supreme
court has wrongly ruled that. And, also, because
the main point is if you understand it,
these weren't American things. They were outlined as
inherent rights that the United States government at
the time were outlining.
Inherent. Inalienable. That's not unique here. The point
is on top of that, especially people here
with visas
who are not their their residents
are protected for sure. And so as he's
going after them on the conversation of saying
things about Israel, and they go, well, they're
here on visa. It doesn't matter. You're this
is what I was saying earlier, guys. Under
the guise of going after what you think
are Democrats supporting Israel, that's the whole woke
agenda,
you're allowing them to circumvent your constitutional rights.
That should matter to an American more than
anything else because that will open that door,
and they will kick it in like they've
done every time. But all these Republicans out
there going after the woke agenda are being
played, or either that or they don't care.
This is what you should care about.
So this is remember, this is what I
showed you.
This is at a rally they called a
jihad rally. It was a vigil for Hangry
Job. A child that was killed by Israel
that has been roundly proven even by corporate
media. They killed her for no reason, then
killed the people coming to help her.
That's what they do.
And they say, join us at the jihad
rally as we assist ICE in deportation efforts.
Because they support Palestine?
Yes.
It's just absolutely sickening how clear this is.
So here is one of these people. So
this is at that rally. Okay. So they
they propagandize. They put it out. A call
for violence. Come here and help us go
after these people.
K? Then they go to the actual the
the vigil for a dead child,
and here's what this person did.
Right? He didn't manage for so much.
Come on. Show your face so we can
get you deported by ice. Today marks 1
year since the Israeli military martyred Indra Jab,
and New Yorkers have set up a vigil
in our memory. Zionist agitators are here at
the vigil,
disturbing the peaceful protesters.
Come on.
Throw
to justify all of this. This is wrong.
This is criminal.
This is a violation of international law. This
is a violation of Judaism.
Y'all got your ceasefire. Now you just wanna
drag it out. Do you wanna play with
your Why are they still here? The ceasefire
is achieving
some achievements, but we need way more than
that. We need a ceasefire in the West
Bank. We need a ceasefire in entire Palestine.
We need an end to this occupation.
Free Palestine.
We are standing here at this vigil for
him,
where this, 5 year old girl
was so ruthlessly
murdered,
while she was looking for help. She was
seeking for help in Gaza a year ago.
This is a sad story. It's unfortunately not
the only single story. This is a this
is just one out of so many other
stories. This is something that should wake up
everyone.
Yep. Exactly.
Right. So
you have Jewish groups there. Orthodox Jewish rabbis
speaking about this, but did Jihad rally. Right?
I mean, do you think that idiot with
the long hair screaming the ice do you
think he's the does he practice Judaism?
Or is he supporting Zionism? What would you
say? Seeing as how there's Jewish rabbis there
supporting this or you're screaming at a young
child's I mean, it's not that hard to
recognize.
And I simply said and so the guy
said, show your face so we can get
you deported by ICE.
I said, sure. Glad we're not seeing the
politicization of government agencies like we saw under
Biden. Right?
Trump has effectively
allowed a foreign government to act through the
US government agencies to censor, threaten, and attack
Americans. Hashtag winning.
Look at the engagement.
You I mean, come on, guys. Like, you
realize that did there's especially since what we're
constantly talking about. And we shared it. This
is straight up suppression by Twitter.
Are you really gonna pretend that this is
engagement you get from an audience that's engaged
in this conversation and an important point to
show you how alarming that is? This is
Twitter making sure these things don't get shared
because it's blatantly
obvious.
It's sick.
Now here here is the video of them
doing this to students.
Most of these are American students who just
support Palestine.
What whether like, here's what's crazy about it.
There's plenty of examples, whether it's Proud Boys
or whatever else, where Republicans, whatever else conservatives
are wearing face coverings because they don't wanna
be because the point is the government goes
after them. Right? So in this case,
because you wanna make it about a democrat
thing, you make it like a mask or
whatever else, but, you know, so they cover
their faces with Akiva or something else.
Terrorists. Terrorists.
It's the same damn thing. The point is,
obviously, these people are these Zionist groups are
going after them. They're trying to harass them.
They're trying to get them fired. They're trying
to get them so that's what they do.
Makes perfect sense to me, but it's all
about a means to an end. Lying for
their agenda. So here are some of those
American students that these Zionist groups are threatening.
I've heard word from any of these so
called America First politicians. Beeper? No.
Have a beeper for you. Somebody wants a
beeper?
Have a beeper for you. You have a
beeper? I have a beeper for you, sir.
Yeah. Is that a beeper?
Have a beep These are American students, guys.
These are not visa students. These are American
students supporting
Palestine. This is a Zionist grown man
offering them pagers. That's not it doesn't whether
they're bombs or not, that is a threat,
and you damn well know it.
Can you imagine if this was a a
Muslim man who was doing this to a
bunch of Jewish students? Oh my god. That
would be the biggest story of the century
to them,
and it should be an important story regardless.
But right now, I haven't heard a word.
You pick it. You pick any one of
these names that keeps screaming about Americans,
whether in Gaza or whatever else. Not a
word.
They don't care about any of you. Beeper
for you. Don't lie running away. Have a
beeper for you. Covering your face. Yeah. Have
a beeper for you. Why are you covering
your face? Security.
Have a beeper for you. Here's a beeper.
Why are you Covering your face because you're
a maniac and what you're doing and you
can see it on their account. That's the
that's the account we're showing you. They're literally
going, get them, attack them, fire them, get
them, you know, get them removed from their
position, get them deported.
Yeah. Gee, why are you covering your face?
I don't know.
No. No. There's a beeper field.
There's a beeper field. Don't touch me when
you actually don't touch me, sir. You don't
private property. Get out. I'm asking you to
leave the bill. Beeper, sir. I'm asking you
to leave the bill. Hands on me. You
know what you do? Don't put your hands
on me. See, what then, of course, then
he runs out and pretends like he was
attacked because he's Jewish. I mean, it's just
the stupidest thing. You're literally trying to hand
things that they that you're pretending are bombs.
That's a
threat. From a point of criminal law, you
can go to jail for that.
Nobody cares.
So h APAC tracker. This is called this
is the account right here. Batarusa.
Says has been calling him, APAC tracker, relentlessly
and left him horrific messages. I don't know
how they got his cell phone. I mean,
we all know how. I mean, that's how
these people operate. This is intelligence, guys. This
this is this is an Israeli operation.
That's my opinion.
But if we can't see by now that
that's what this is through ADL, APAC, it's
all the same stuff. And you think that's
about Jewish people? You have not been paying
attention.
It says they called at least 10 times
consecutively this afternoon. Here's the transcript of the
voice mail. It says you left your Islamic
s h I t hole. You didn't go
to another Islamic s h I t hole.
You came to America where you get where
you they gave you every right and privilege,
and now you wanna turn into another Islamic
s h I t hole. What the f
is wrong with your thinking?
Think for think for one second. Think for
one effing second, it says. These are the
pieces of s h I t you ran
away from, and now you wanna
I mean, how in the world they think
they've this this is a an account that
has been dedicated to highlighting APAC funding of
US politicians.
And all you could do is make it
about racism and race and because that's all
they care about.
They are obsessed
with racial division.
When it says they GoFundMe is helping Zionist
terror organization, but our raise funds for bounties
to encourage bomb threats in New York City.
What it's that's what they're doing. You just
saw it. And that you read it, they're
telling you that they're going after these people.
Help us raise money to go after these
students.
Zionist media tabloid says, Batar US appears to
be a New York based, Batar Zionist organization,
granted at 5 zero one c three status
in July. Its president, Matthew Cronin, CPA, also
handles the books for Ron
Trostian Family Foundation and Blue Star Foundation, both
run out of the same PO box.
Interesting. He's, of course, the chairman of the
Global Guitar Organization with links to Cahan Chai,
which, again, we've talked about in the past,
the Jewish supremacy organization designated as a terrorist
group by the US government,
but seemed to operate with no problem. Right?
Another fact, the spokesman for the Global Guitar
Org, Jake Novak, is the same guy who
tried to export Matt Gaetz a few years
ago extort. Excuse me.
Guitar continues their unhinged targeting harassment, including their
fundraiser for hitmen.
Hopefully, the info for this thread can help
the inevitable legal complaint.
Another interesting find, your government records listed batar
at 250
Park Avenue,
Roan's new building before it was changed. So
they're gonna how much do you wanna bet
they're gonna call this doxing even though it's
public information? But that's what they've drawn that
line for where they argue even though you
post it or you they're probably gonna go
off these groups. I promise that.
They seem to have let Laura Loehr back
on though for no big deal. Right? But
it's all selectively applied. The bottom line is,
guys, these groups
are publicly displaying
that they're going after Americans
because of their ideas.
It's as simple as that. And if you
think the Trump Organization does not support this,
you're not watching.
Or if I if you think they they
support it, in case that was double double
negative.
Here's what Kim Iverson said about the same
video.
It says the person who needs to be
deported in this is this Zionist
threatening to blow up American kids.
I'm so glad somebody has principles and integrity
out there.
I mean, it's it's simple. There's no air
in this conversation, guys. It doesn't matter who
you support politically.
The person doing the wrong thing is the
one threatening to blow up children.
Funny how that's also what's being ignored in
Gaza.
Common thread. But it says the Zionist AKA
Jew is American. Try they're she they're trying
to pretend that she's being racist. It says
these terrorist supporting kids and by the way,
here's how dumb these people are. It's a
Zionist organization.
That's what it is.
So maybe they're Jewish, probably.
But he's a Zionist. So you can wanna
pretend look, you see, this is the game
they play.
The point is that what what she's making
it out to be is that we're talking
about a Zionist organization that is threatening kids.
You wanna make it about Jewish people because
you wanna go wink wink. That's what you
really mean even though she doesn't.
That used to work.
It doesn't anymore.
But it says these terrorist supporting kids
who don't know better or are morons are
covering their faces. Why do you think that
is, Kim? Oh, so you're assuming.
You're willing to allow these kids to be
threatened with bombs because you assume they may
have a reason that you that, you know,
they do it because of thing the thing
I'm thinking right now.
Oh, you know them, do you? Did you
speak to them? Did they sign a document
and say that's
subjective
assumption, and we should all laugh at this
complete moron. Or on top of that, realize
he's hauling them terror supporting kids because they
support Palestine as the Palestinians
are being genocided.
Not hard to recognize what's going on here.
And then she makes a perfect statement by
saying, he has an accent. Are you sure
he's not there on a student visa?
Mic drop.
Right? I mean, oh, wait a minute. What
about I don't know what to say right
now. Oh, no.
Of course, it's only about certain student visas.
Right? Certain kinds of people with certain skin
colors. That's what it's really about. These people
are transparent.
Patricia Dowling highlights APAC tracker saying, predictably,
APAC's New York representatives and senators are silent
on this Zionist organization placing bounties on New
Yorkers and encouraging bomb threats.
Right? They used to care about bomb threats
in New York quite a bit. Funny how
that doesn't matter right now in certain context.
And Patricia says, why is this organization allowed
to place bounties on the lives of American
citizens in the United States?
Crickets.
Where you at, Stefanik?
Cotton?
Kirby? Miller? Anybody? Where you at? I mean,
doesn't this matter? I thought Americans were your
whole point. Until they're not.
And don't forget, as we just showed the
other day, which is still very real and
is not being discussed by all the people
that claim that they care about veterans and
all the different points, as long as it
makes the agenda look bad, they ignore it.
And, of course, it's from the city of
Newark, and we don't like the Democrats, so
we'll ignore it still. Even though it is
a veteran
who was
detained,
and as he writes,
suffered the indignity of having his legitimacy of
his military documentation questioned.
Now they went into this restaurant, and this
has been publicly covered. You can look at
it for yourself as much as it's being
denied with people that don't want to research
it. ICE went in and arrested a bunch
of people with no warrant. Only went after
the brown people even though there was other
people there that were you know, my point
is,
if we're talking about immigration, couldn't there be
an immigrant from Germany that's on a visa?
Of course, there could.
But they're clearly showing you it's about very
clear skin color dynamics, which we know what
that's about. It's just for Israel. It's about
Palestine.
And they arrested a pal a Puerto Rican
who is a military veteran in the United
States.
It's not hard to wrap your mind around
this. So they're already abusing this, and we
just saw that group using ICE. They're already
using this whole thing against their own political
adversaries, and it's and they're and it's working.
I don't think Trump's confused about that. I
think they're all very aware of this. This
is my point about all of this being
an agenda.
They're using these woke policies to get you
to think you're doing things against Democrats, and
all you're doing is watching this government be
completely puppeteered by a Zionist government.
And you're losing everything that you thought you're
fighting for.
But here's what Linda TikTok
said. It says, holy shit.
NYPD
are reportedly
restricting
from cooperate restricted from cooperating with ICE agents
who sent out the memo.
Now it's interesting. Right? Because, yes, I could
argue that doing so might be politically driven.
I think all of these people are politically
driven.
But my only point is that you you
know, funny how it is how easy it
is for these large accounts to just blindly
assume in the direction of their political agenda
and half the time being wrong about it,
but that never deviates. They still get the
people still support still here. The point is
you're simply highlighting this as because you think
you know it's politically motivated, which I would
agree it's likely,
but you don't know that.
It also could be from what I just
showed you, that they're going, well, time out.
I literally see these very terroristic groups using
this process
and falsely claiming people need to be deported
and sometimes getting taken. I just saw in
Newark,
ICE take somebody who was not a who
was a veteran. I just saw them go
in and take them without a warrant in
the first place. Woah. Woah. Woah. Maybe we
should make sure this is being done legally
and not in the interest of a foreign
government.
But see, lives with TikTok does not care
about any of that. My point my point
is we don't neither of us know. So
a real
journalist, researcher, human being would care to find
out the facts before you lurch into the
conversation
and made it about your clear political agenda.
That's all these people are about.
So my point is, obviously, we see this
going in a direction that is not in
line with American rights.
Whether or not you think that they should
be doing this, shouldn't we make sure that
first they respect the constitutional right? Yeah.
That would be America first. Wouldn't it, Libs
TikTok?
Cradle points out, an official from meta's,
wait. Hold on.
Oh, wait a minute. I I think I
closed one on accident. There was one more
I was gonna show
that I had in line there.
I'll leave it there. I think I actually
closed the tab. Either way, point was the
same. I thought I was gonna end with
one more thing, which is simply that this
at this moment is clearly being abused.
And that should matter to people that care
about constitutional rights. Not just those that, you
know, feign to when it's in their interest.
Now, in regard to the same point of
the Israeli influence,
whether it's about pagers and electronic info and
or everything else, guys. It's literally across the
board right now. I wanted to highlight this,
the technological theme.
The Cradle points out an official for Meta's
WhatsApp chat service has told Reuters that the
company detected an attempt by Israeli spyware company,
Paragon
Solutions, to hack 90 users on its platform.
The official added that the WhatsApp
that that WhatsApp had sent Paragon a cease
and desist order,
but they declined to comment. Now you you
might be familiar with this. You know why?
Because Derek covered this on January 7th.
Now, Crainer's doing amazing work. I think they
covered this back then. This is about the
follow-up of
WhatsApp commenting on it, as well as drop
site, revealed that nearly a 100 journalists, the
same conversation. But I wanted to show you
since this is important, this this important story
has been circulating the last few days.
Make sure you check out Derek's coverage from
on for TLAB from January 7th.
I said, if you follow TLAB, you're ahead
of the curve.
But as always,
it's
just this is ridiculous.
If you if if I had 10,000 followers
alone, you would get more engagement with that
on average,
but not when it's certain things against a
certain country or against a certain agenda that's
being run by a certain government. That's, that
was conf I meant the last one was
the US government. The point here is that
this is important, and it's very clear what's
happening. It is an Israeli group
that are now trying to kind of hide
behind a Florida company
that is basically spying on Americans through spyware
that is
popular like chickenpox across this country.
Derek covered it in January 7th.
The Israeli spyware firm NSO Group found liable
for hacks of of WhatsApp users. And the
story is crazy. They caught them. They lied
about it. I mean, it's it's exactly what
we're talking about. This is Israeli government aspect
the the infiltration of everything happening in this
country. You've got Zionist groups attacking Americans threatening
with bombs. You've got tech in from infiltration,
suppressing censoring. You got Trump passing executive orders
to censor Americans for Israel. How do you
not see this?
I don't understand how people anywhere don't understand
can't see how alarming this is right now.
It's everything we've all worried about coming to
fruition in front of you.
Now, this is the article meta's WhatsApp says
Israeli spyware company Paragon targeted scores of users.
And this simply I'll show you this other
one that simply is this plus others that
that gets this article has more information.
By simply saying that they, you know, were
caught.
Now, Meta's WhatsApp says spyware company Paragon targeted
its own users in 2 dozen countries.
This, of course, says they Paragon declined to
comment but it says the official
said WhatsApp has since disputed the hacking effort
and has refute has,
disrupted. Excuse me. And it was referring to
targets to it to Canadian Internet watchdog group,
Citizen Lab. The official declined to discuss how
it determined Paragon is responsible.
He said law enforcement and industry partners had
been informed, but declined to give details.
Now why would that ever make sense? In
what other context in ever with a hack
have you heard something like that?
But it happened, but we can't give you
any more details about who and where it
came from. And the government didn't we told
them, but they don't wanna tell you either.
Well, gee.
Maybe it's because they're working with the person
doing it. The FBI did not immediately return
a message taking comments, so the FBI, when
informed, didn't even wanna know about it.
It's just like, my god. We're in a
bad way right now. Spyware merchants such as
Paragon sell high end surveillance software to government
clients and typically pitch their services
as critical to fighting crime and protecting national
security
as we edge into precrime.
Right? As the FBI and everything else, we're
just talking about this.
Such spy tools have repeatedly been discovered on
the phones of journalists, activists, opposition politicians,
and at least 50 US officials.
And it keeps going.
See, you only a very special kind of
stupid cannot see what that is.
There are 50 US officials find this, and
they just go, well, no no no comment.
It says raising concerns over the unchecked proliferation
of technology.
Paragon, which was reportedly acquired by a Florida
based company called
AE Industrial Partners just last month, that's an
effort to hide this right now, has tried
to position itself publicly as one of the
industry's more responsible players.
It's Israel, guys. That's what it is. Paragon
Solutions is Israel. And it says its website
ad advertises ethically based tools, teams, and insights.
Disrupt and yeah.
It's it's this is my is it Al
Sham it's it's Al Newsro to Haightel Al
Sham. It's the same thing. They gave it
a new name, and they look back and
go, are you good? Does that are you
will you ignore us now? And apparently, it
works. This is not a question of some
bad apples. These types of abuses, it says,
are a feature of the commercial spyware industry.
And yet, it doesn't stop.
Anybody confused?
It's designed to be surreptitious and end up
on your phone without you knowing it, and
the US government's working with Israel on it.
But nothing more.
Well, AE Industrial Partners simply point this shows
that they have been they've invested in Israel
by as evidenced by their involvement with Paragon
Solutions, an Israeli cyber offensive firm
involved in discussions for US fund to potentially
buy this right now. Their overlap with Israel
is the point in a lot of ways.
Let's not forget the Israeli election interference and
psychological operation industrial complex where they were even
Guardian in Mont, La Grande, I think, did
an investigation where they proved this Israeli
working for the Israeli government was influencing elections
and bought farming all over the world. He
he he flouted or
he gloated about 92
presidential elections that he influenced.
Some in the American United States.
Amazing how that could be broken mainstream story
and yet
people don't talk about
it. Almost like they're afraid to talk about
Israel.
Well, remember, Paragon Solutions is currently in a
major deal with Department of Homeland Security.
Not a joke.
So we know they're intertwined. So Paragon Solutions
is a spyware firm spying on you, and
they've already been caught, and yet your government's
working with them.
You confused?
Hey. Guess what else? ICE is working with
Paragon Solutions. See how it all comes together?
$2,000,000
contract. So ICE is using Paragon Solutions, and
ICE is working with Zionist organizations, or at
least they're being used by them, to go
after Palestinian supporters.
And while they do it, they're scooping up
all the information of you and anybody else
around you from your phones and your biometrics.
Everywhere, we're using drones. We're we can't this
is everywhere. Every different little piece of what's
going on is adding up to the same
outcome.
DHS must come clean on contract with spyware
purveyor Paragon Solutions. It says the Center For
Democracy Technology has joined 35 other civil society
organizations and a number of spyware experts in
a letter that calls on the DOH, the
Department of Homeland Security,
to release see, that that's the
not DOH. Department of Homeland Security to release
details about its $2,000,000
contract with Paragon Solutions.
Paragon is a spyware vendor headquartered in Israel
whose flagship product, graphite,
is used to extract communications content.
The contract between DHS and Paragon is reportedly
under review for compliance
with president Biden's groundbreaking executive orders on spyware.
Oh, but guess what? That was back in
November. Now Trump's in power, and now no
one cares. I'm not making that up. They
they just oh, Biden did it, then the
other side the other way is good. That's
what's happening. Trump is doubling down on everything
is real right now.
The order,
before, barred agencies of the US government from
making operational use of commercial spyware. That, among
other things, poses a risk to improper use
by foreign governments.
You know, for to spying on journalists, dissidents,
political figures. Oh, so that's what Trump wants
to do now. They're using that. They're doing
it.
Understand,
this is a huge,
huge national security risk.
For the people that always love to push
that line, this is as big as it
gets. And they're rolling it out
right in front of you.
Now we talked about this. This is what
I think is happening.
The new Trump administration and the technocratic Zionist
coup of the United States.
Same point. Funny how the very people that
call ever their coup suddenly don't recognize it
when it's the most blatant I've ever seen.
Now, Derek also wrote this, meet the spyware
companies preparing to unleash their tech in Trump's
second term. It's already happening. This is Paragon
Solutions. It's also what the I think to
Tokyo is 1.
Other one was,
which one?
Blanking on it.
NSO Group, that's Paragon Solutions. But there's there's
there's been many of them. Most can I
I think it's over
and snag it out of here? It's almost
50% of the entire market is Israeli government.
50% almost
of spyware, which is basically crimes, guys. It's
what it is. It's criminal. It is surreptitious
spyware that end up on your phone without
you knowing it. Now, let's let's check out
the Paragon Solutions website, and let's get some
more information. What do you think?
Oh, I guess there's nothing.
Do you know what kind of sites have
things like, what kind of sites have zero
information?
Intelligence Fronts.
Do you think a company that needs your
business or anybody's business that's trying to market
itself, whether the government's or not, would have
a website that has zero information?
That's the thing. That's the link we're on.
That's the the email link. And then it
says, what about us? Paragon Solutions, US Inc.
Lie.
They're they're barely getting a Florida con con
this is an Israeli company. Provides our customers
with ethnically ethically
based tools and teams. Oh, really? Ethically based?
This inherently in itself is unethical.
That's it though. That's what you get. Empowering
ethical cyber defense. Right? All they want you
to see is that. Ethical.
We're not criminals. You know you know, stress
overstress things like that. Criminals.
Now, here's what Trump
said. Now, this is where it gets interesting
more so. It's about the fact that this
is something Whitney has been saying forever.
The privatization.
Right? Whether it's total information awareness to Palantir,
which is one example,
or any, I mean, any number of things
we've shown you, this this transition.
Right? Or, you know, at DARPA's program into
Elon Musk's artificial intelligence or any number of
them, guys. That's what we're watching. Here's Trump
telling you.
That's the plan. Right? So we're now we're
seeing all these cuts and slashes. Everyone's going,
what about this? What are we gonna do?
We're gonna push it into the private market.
Now what does that sound like? Does it
sound like freedom and democracy? Or does that
begin to sound like a fascistic overlap of
government and private business? Every time in history
that has led to the we're watching this
go the same way it always goes, guys.
That's why
not not the right conversation to have right
now, but why we should start asking whether
we need government at all.
Here's what he had to say.
Force, whether it's offering what we've called the
buyout package or other efforts. Do you have
any concerns that there will be employees broadly
across the federal government who might take that
up? And they're a part of the many
ways that agencies protect the public, from food
inspections to water safety
to,
the air conditioner. Everybody's replaceable,
and, we'll get very good people to replace
them if it turns out to be, more
than we thought.
It could be a lot, it could be
a little, We don't know. But we'd we'd
love to have them leave. We're trying to
remember this. We want them to go into
the private sector.
It's our dream to have everybody almost working
in the private sector, not in the public.
Is that your dream?
Certainly not the dream of what we pretend
we're driving for. I mean, that that is
let's see. They love to make that out
to be that it benefits you, America. No,
it doesn't. They are not you. They are
the 0.01%
billionaire circle oligarchy. They that benefits their companies
That benefits their interests. Like, in every one
of these things, even the tariff conversation,
that's not benefiting you that money. It's like
that money goes back into their inner circle.
You're not the one. These big you're not
running because some means there are people that
run Bottom line is the people that benefit
by and large are the people that that
end up profiting from that dynamic. You pay
more for products.
It's basic.
Sector.
We have many people. Very few people came
to work. Work. They were you know, it
started more or less with COVID, but actually
even before COVID.
But it started with, with the COVID. They
didn't come back.
And, then Biden let them get away with
murder and, they Ah, see. So Biden bad.
So whatever he says next, we need to
do. The point is drive them all into
the private sector.
David Icke says exactly. They're transferring the power
from official government to corporate oligarchy
while deleting regulation to impose a tyranny with
less even less oversight.
Now let's just say you think that that
was because they're all the good guys and
they're gonna save you from everything.
May sound nice. Even if you think that's
the reality,
you're still going in a direction that reduces
your ability to do anything else.
Even if they do that.
So when years go by and then they
just decide to change or somebody else takes
power, guess what? No. You have you have
any mechanism.
Right? The the less oversight they're they're increasing
like, here's what's funny. They came at this
as an idea of reducing government, reducing, like,
rebels, fight the deep state and slashing, getting
rid of everything. They're building more government.
What they're doing here is building out the
surveillance apparatus, building out and removing the things
that they even the illusions of checks and
balances.
Now look, I'm I'm I'm of the mind
that we don't need any government. Right? But
this is not in that direction, guys. As
much as you would wanna think that's in
this direction, this is expanding it into a
less accountable direction with more power
for them.
Mister bright side, of course, says, what a
disappointment you turned out to be. So short
sighted in your whole age.
Right. Because mister bright side knows what's about
to happen, and David Icke doesn't.
No. I would argue none of them know.
None of us know.
What's what's sad is people like mister Bright
side believe what they're told.
Talk about naive.
Even if he's right, the point is like
before. You don't know what Trump thinks. You
don't know what his plan is. You're not
the one that sees the distant plan and
e David Ike is shortsighted.
You believe what they're told.
That's the stupidest position
ever
in political time. Whether or not it turned
out to be right. Historically, if you listen
to a politician tell you and you believe
it without question, you're the fool.
Right? That's whole historically, almost every single time.
But he knows better.
That's this that's this new dumb sleeping giant
who wrote about in 2016 that woke up
all of a sudden and pretend,
politics began in 2016. The point is that's
really silly to think because they're the good
guys and they know. So you're let let
them tear down everything because they're gonna build
it back better. Oh, that sounds like something
I remember.
Amazing what these people can ignore.
Now Elon Musk,
con combining this,
says this is the critical battle to restore
people power to the people.
See, that's what you wanna hear. Right?
What's he pointing to? Is he pointing to
some some great equalizer that's gonna give people
power equal? No. He's pointing to a comment
by Joe Lonsdale from Palantir about privatization.
Because that gives pat power back to the
people.
Does it?
No. In fact, no. It doesn't. It completely
removes you from the equation.
But it says, from the massive unelected bureaucracy.
Right?
An unelected bureaucrat
pointing to another, I guess, extension of another
kind of unelected oh, I mean, what would
you call a Palantir or, like, a Citibank
of Obama? I mean, that is the deep
state. It's not a a bureau I mean,
I guess you could argue in some cases
they become that, but you're they're they're the
purse strings, guys. They're the the technological power
money influencers.
My point is that this is an elected
bureaucrat pointing to the deep state and acting
like that is gonna give you power away
from that.
I just don't know why people can be
this blind.
Anybody out there that doesn't see that what
he's doing right here is is simply going
you know, pointing at the deep state while
telling you you're fired in the deep state.
Like, it's as simple as that.
This is if your elected representatives cannot overcome
the bureaucrats who control government, then you live
in a bureaucracy, not a dual democracy. Well,
no. We live in neither.
There is bureaucracy, but we live in an
oligarchy. In a full authoritarian oligarchy that's becoming
a technocratic oligarchy.
It's also authoritarian.
But Joe Lonsdale says events are not well,
you read it for yourself. He's keeps screen
he quotes and then quotes, and he's highlighting
all these different overlaps. Joe Lonsdale is Palantir.
He's one of the found founders of Palantir.
If you don't know by now that Palantir
represents one of the largest threats we have
that over I mean, Palantir right now is
working with Israel to effectively commit
genocide.
That's public.
January
2024, they partner with Israel for artificial intelligence.
They're using artificial intelligence to kill people. Lavender,
habsura, and then weirdly, Palantir just is is
now overlap with the Trump administration to roll
out the AI infrastructure for this country.
That should be kinda scary knowing what they're
using it for right now. And And the
fact that you're working with groups like Larry
Ellison, all and Oracle, or SoftBank, which is
basically Israel, or
OpenAI,
ChatGPT,
and Sam Altman.
You know, Worldcoin.
The the world currency that stakes your eye
your bi your bi your biometrics.
God. It's just it's like a cartoon right
now of what people choose to ignore. But
this is the point, guys. People like this
are trying to tell you that your own
subjugation is how you become free, and people
are gobbling it up.
Donald Trump rolls out the AI biomedical control
grid backed by Israel and the deep state.
That's what we're watching roll out, and they're
calling it freedom.
Derek wrote about it at Stargate. Trump partners
with technocrats to promote mRNA injections, AI, transhumanism.
And to make that complete,
they just rolled out the HR 1513
Future Networks Act,
which is not you couldn't this is just
Trump. This is the current co congress rolling
this out, but it's bipartisan
support, and I guarantee this flies by. What's
it about?
Six g.
The bill requires the Federal Communications Commission to
establish a the 6 g task force to
report on the 6th generation wireless techno. Yeah.
That's what's happening. And and before you start
pretending like he's got nothing yeah. Well, he's
very supportive. I want 5 g, he says.
I and even 6 g technology in the
United States as soon as possible. Said that
in 2019.
He's all about it.
And I guarantee more Republicans than anybody are
very aware that the whole 5g, 6g, the
the overlap of this is part of the
control structure.
You know that. I know that. But sadly,
right now, because they're doing it, it's apparently
gonna be ignored.
Speak up if you've got the if you
have integrity.
If you believe that's a problem, say something
about it.
Now,
let's move into
the next one.
And this is going to be predominantly
I mean, we're gonna start with a little
bit still on foreign policy, but then ultimately
get into the overlap of where I think
this and I've already been making points about
it, but the DEI
manipulation.
Let's see. Where is that window? There we
go.
So starting here,
I didn't want you to miss this.
Now, really, I I probably should've thrown this
in the beginning beginning. That's where I thought
I had this for the wrong window. But
it's important to see this because it's just
one of these big points. I mean, really,
if we're talking about
lies,
you know, promises made, promises kept. We keep
hearing this really stupid mantra when half the
time, what you're claiming is a promise kept
is the last thing Americans should want. But
here's Ukraine.
Right? If you I don't probably didn't see
this because I'm probably not being pointed to
by all the Republican screening. He's keeping all
his promises. Well, the US government has now
transferred around 90 Patriot air defense interceptors from
storage
in Israel
to Poland
for delivery to Ukraine.
Okay. Then wasn't wasn't it Marjorie Taylor Greene
who was just screening for the rooftops that
Trump kept his promise about not funding Ukraine,
but made sure to keep funding Israel because
that matter in Egypt?
Well, how about that? 7 days all of
a sudden, here we are. I said, what
was that about suspending
aid to Ukraine? What was that again about
promises kept?
All you're doing I mean, it's just being
covered by corporate media.
You you're just having it go through Israel
through Poland to Ukraine. But it's
US storage of these like, this is just
a the ongoing agenda
for greater Israel, for everything you're trying to
accomplish. And he see like, Trump it seems
like Trump, he couldn't he wasn't even capable
of waiting.
And for you if you gave it, like,
another 2 weeks, people would have forgotten about
it, I would imagine. Because of how quick
this stuff goes. My point is, I bet
you anything that Israel didn't want that. So
they made it happen.
That's what this is.
Think about how lazy it is. Think about
how silly it is to make a whole
big case about not doing this. And then
within a matter of days, you end up
finding them anyway.
Where is everybody?
Very little engagement as usual.
Now one point I wanted to highlight that
I thought was interesting, just before we get
into this part about occupation.
East Palestine resident.
Town fractured after years of derailment. This is
from January 27,
2025.
It says nearly 2 years after the train
derailment,
she says she's still feeling the effects.
Flint was her name is Flint. She was
forced to move.
If she goes back
today,
she still gets rashes and other symptoms.
I
mean, again, I told you so,
just doesn't cut it with something like this.
If she's getting the rashes, which is the
chloracne, that means these are high level dioxin
contamination.
And we know that, guys. We know it.
That's what happened.
All the others, Conyers. I mean,
these people are suffering, guys.
Nobody seems to care.
Not even the people screaming maha apparently because
I mean, I don't even know why. This
doesn't even seem to be connected to Trump.
It just it's not there's no partisan draw,
apparently, because all we live in now is
this fake controlled, meaty atmosphere where we scream
about
helicopters because they told you to.
The problem here is that this is a
big deal,
and they're still getting sick to this day.
And now it's so far past it. Norfolk
Southern, as I told you, has made more
money than before. They they benefited from this,
but that's how fascist the corporate overlap works.
And that's what they're rolling you into right
now. If you think they weren't accountable before,
wait till this future they're building.
Now on that note, speaking about land grabs,
because funny to me how they can't stop
talking about that even though we can see
this happening in places that aren't as interesting
for the partisan conversation.
Speaking of land grabs, let's talk about
Israel. Now, I just made this point in
the other show and I was on in
the flow and I wasn't able to I
didn't wanna grab it and search, but here
it is. And this is important to make
a point about. And this clearly overlaps what
we're gonna get into next. Justifying land grab,
Israel says it is, quote, allowed to ignore
international law
anywhere it wants.
Hope Americans are listening right now. I hope
Republicans are listening. This is what the Israeli
government, many who are still there,
truly believe to the point to where they
wrote a a statement to the supreme to
the the Supreme Court
saying, we can break law wherever we want.
International law does not bound does not bind
us.
And then you wanna stand back and wonder
why they don't care about what they're doing
in the United States, what they're doing in
Gaza, what they're taking from Syria, what they're
taking from Lebanon because they believe they could
do what they want. Well, clearly, the world,
in some cases, the governments of the world
have allowed them to think that.
These were this is from 2018.
The Israeli government has recently claimed that it
can legislate anywhere in the world. Direct quote.
And just so we get to get to
it right out of the gate,
this is the document.
Initially public, this was covered by Herets, okay?
This is not a secret. It isn't Hebrew.
You could get a translator. This is exactly
what it is and it's widely covered.
Of course, not by corporate media in the
west because that would be racist even though
it's true.
It says
legislate anywhere in the world
that it is quote entitled to violate the
sovereignty of foreign countries.
That's their quote.
And that is quote allowed to ignore the
directives of international law in any field it
desires.
Clearly, they think that.
This was written as an official response letter
to the Supreme Court I just showed you.
The background of these statements is the new
law from last year, which legalizes
outright theft of Palestinian land. Now I'll read
you directly from Aretz in a second.
Now the settlement
regularization
law, that's what they call it. It's typical.
Was passed in February last year from 2018,
remember, in order to retroactively legalize thousands of
settler homes and structures built on Palestinian private
land to avert the possibility that the supreme
court might one day sanction the removal.
Because there is pushback even in Israel on
these illegal settlements.
Very minimal today, but it it existed within
the political spec sphere until much so right
now, today's reality is the kind of where
you saw the religious extremists in their government
take power because of Netanyahu. And it gets
to that at the bottom of the article.
But at this point, they were still and
they called it like the lefty. Like, it's
the same thing they do here. Right? In
this case, it was the the bad left
rep, you know, left wing Israelis. But in
this case, they were the ones that were
going, let's not murder everybody. But not even
that really. Just let's not, in this case,
allow the supreme court to rule something we
know is a violation of national law. I
take back what I even said, actually. There's
plenty of them. Most of them, in fact,
very much have the same hatred for Palestinians.
The point is they just don't want it
to be that easily perceived by the world.
But there to be clear, there are sections
of this even on the Israeli side that
see a problem here. They've spoken up since
this October 7th. But it says,
before the law was passed, Israeli law still
considered such structures illegal. Even their law did.
Now I still argue they still were doing
it. They just they like the public display
of saying, see, we think it's illegal. But
even though under international law, absolutely, all the
settlements are a flagrant violation of the law.
Be they located on private land or not.
That's always been the reality. It still is
to this day.
It was not only Herets that called out
the lay the law as theft law.
It was also a long time Likud nix
from the Likud party from Netanyahu, such as
lawmaker Benny, BEGIN, was it BEGIN? Or was
it
benign? How do you say that again? B
e g e I n? Former Likoub minister
Dan Meritor called it evil and dangerous even
though prime minister Netanyahu was warning
that passing it may end up getting Israeli
officials to the international court in The Hague.
Think about that today.
So this is my point is that Netanyahu
and the rest of them, these aren't good
people. But even he has been driven further
to the right by the smelters of Ben
Gavirs because they threatened to pull out which
destroys his government, which Netanyahu needs because if
he doesn't hold control of the government, he's
going to prison.
These are your allies, guys. That's crazy. And
this is public information.
And so the crazy part of it is
even he was going, we can't do that.
We'll end up in prison.
Too late now. They did it because he
got forced to, and now they're committing a
genocide. But it says I should act a
critical note here about Meridore's central claim
that it is in fact erroneous
regarding the West Bank.
And that East Jerusalem
is by international law a part of the
West Bank. And Israel has applied its sovereignty
unilaterally upon it, de facto since 1967,
and in quasi constitutional basic law in 1980
in defiance of international law and United s
United Nations Supreme Court,
United Nations Security Council, excuse me, resolutions.
The point is it's not just the the
it's a the the the main point comes
around the West Bank. That they're claiming we
can take it even though we know that's
not the case. It's a it's international law.
It's been illegal the entire time. But in
this discussion about the West Bank, that's where
this claim came out. Where they're going, look.
We can do whatever we want anywhere in
the world. Why would the West Bank be
any different? And that's the argument made by
the Israeli government.
Israel's famous equation of and this is something
that's public.
Maximum Jews, maximum territory,
minimum Palestinians.
Let's keep pretending it's about Hamas, guys. Came
this came this time to mean that Israel
would risk enacting state legislation in an area
where Jews were still
generally not a majority
in the hope that it would help them
become it.
Because that's what this is about.
Retroactively
legalize about 4,000 settler homes that are illegal.
In the recent court case, court case, the
plaintiffs challenged the law pointing to the obvious
illegality.
They said them and fellow petitioners argued that
the Knesset is not permitted to enact and
impose laws on territory occupied by the state
of Israel. The point being illegal occupation.
That's the international law reality. You can't just
take that you're supposed to allow people to
go back to that territory once the conflict
is over. And it says, thus, the Knesset
cannot enact laws that annex the West Bank
or that violate the rights of Palestinian residents
of the West Bank. Then it goes on
to say the state of Israel in the
recent response letter, which we showed you, that's
right here,
to the court
claimed this in defense.
The Knesset has no limitation,
which prevents it from legislating
extraterritorily
anywhere in the world,
including
Judea and Samaria, West Bank and Gaza.
Very simple.
Went on to say, although the Knesset can
legislate
any place in the world,
although it is entitled to violate the sovereignty
of foreign countries,
clearly, they think that, through legislation that would
be applied to events occurring in their territories,
although it is written,
the authority of the government of Israel to
annex any territory,
although the Knesset may ignore directives of international
law in any area it pleases.
Despite all these, the plaintiffs seek to define
a rule by which precisely
West Bank and Gaza
in West Bank and Gaza, the Knesset is
prohibited from legislating anything. And that precisely there
and nowhere else in the world. It is
subject to directives of international law.
Think about how wild that is.
They're outraged or like look guys if we
all know we can do whatever we want
why would it apply to West Bank and
some separate situation. That's what he just said.
Then it says the Israeli government's extremist response,
this is one of the attorneys, has no
parallel anywhere in the world. It stands in
gross violation of international law and the United
Nations Charter, which obligates member states to refrain
from threatening or using force against the territorial
integrity of other states, including
occupied territories. The Israeli government's extremist position
is, in fact, a declaration of its intention
to proceed with its annexation of the West
Bay, obviously.
And the fact that anybody ever even tried
to deny that while they were building legal
settlements is insane. But that's where we are.
Right now, the US government's denying a genocide
while it's being committed. Talk about insane.
It says that this is a lawyer, has
posted about this and provided some quotes from
the above.
It says, you would think that such proclamations
publicly, by the way, by the Israeli government
would really hit the mainstream news cycle.
Yet, it seems to have gone relatively unnoticed.
And I'm hopefully, you all know why today.
It says several of my contacts have responded
to this little reported news with a certain
disbelief.
Could it really be that Israel's openly saying
that it's above international law? Yes. And it
says indeed, as I mentioned above, it is
not exactly a secret that Israel is now
acting in brazen defiance of international law. More
so today, isn't it? Its own highest legal
authorities are completely aware of it.
But what we also need to see is
that it is has been doing this for
a very long time. In fact, since its
inception.
As I as I mentioned at the time
of the passing of the regulation regularization law,
legalizing the theft of Palestinian land has been
Israeli policy since day 1.
That's the truth. And it says this is
the part of the basis by which
Arnon claims that quote, Israel can legislate anywhere
in the world.
The essence of this is if we could
do it before,
why can't we do it now?
Funny how they make the same argument. Well,
you did it in Iraq.
So,
I mean, they're just children. It's crazy to
me. Sullen children that have been given far
too much power.
So here is one of those articles from
2017. It says voting yes for theft.
As always, Harrettes just telling you what the
west doesn't wanna put is pretending isn't real.
Now it says assuming that Knesset vote takes
place, which it did and it passed.
The state legislature is going to stain itself,
they were writing. Dreadfully, when it approves what's
been dubbed as the regularization
law, meant to retroactively
legalize illegally built homes in the West Bank.
The name of the bill is misleading as
always. I mean, there's so many overlaps to
what does what we see the US government
and Israel do. The Patriot Act. I mean,
this is they're the same thing, it seems.
And it says the name of the bill
is misleading and not by coincidence. The bill
doesn't aim to regularize,
but to steal.
If the vote takes place, the majority of
our lawmakers will raise their hands and approve
the bill that will steal land for Palestinians.
The theft will come after the fact to
accommodate settlements and outposts that were built on
private land, and land will be expropriated
from its owners while the thieves living on
it will be granted the presumption of innocence.
Remember the classic? If I didn't take it,
somebody else will.
These are criminals, guys. There's no way around
it. To grant this theft avail of equitableness,
that's what I thought was relevant here, Palestinians
can prove ownership will receive increased financial compensation,
except they never allow that because they always
dismiss what they claim. Here's the keys. Here's
my deed. Nah. We don't we don't believe
that. Or we don't
we don't acknowledge the authority of that document.
They they never allowed. The point
though, a veil
of equitableness.
This is what Harrettes is hauling out in
2017.
Don't miss how this is happening. This is
the DEI point, guys, of the veil. So
right now, what's happening with this is they're
pretending.
Right, in our government,
using these ideas of these ridiculous agendas, which
very clearly had very damaging effect on a
lot of people,
but were ridiculous.
I mean, as I keep pointing out even
with the trans agenda, guys, the the the
leading hospital at the time was telling you
what they were doing things to
being rash with children treatment. That was written
by Associated Press and yet for it somehow
keeps going? That's it's just these these things
are propped up to be demolished, guys. I
think that's very clear.
And so now they've got us all fixated
on this very clear built up to be
collapsed agenda
so that we don't we miss, apparently, the
prison being built around us while we scream
about pronouns.
And I think that's Israel was doing this
then under the veil of being equitable.
In fact, we're enshining their illegal actions. And
it says as far as the members of
this nationalist religious party are concerned, there is
no area in the land of Israel that
belongs to non Jews.
Except that's not true because Jewish,
Ethiopian Jews, for example,
are treated as second class citizens.
Orthodox Jews that don't believe in Zionism are
literally beat up on the street.
So realize it's not about Jews. That is
the case.
Non Jews aren't allowed to be there, but
plenty of Jews aren't as well
because it's about Zionism.
It says heading this band of thieves
is Naftali Bennett.
All the way back then.
And it says, so that so that's how
it is. To authorize land theft in the
occupied territories, the justice ministers prepared to smash
the country's legal norms with their own hands.
That was what's her name.
We've talked about it before.
That's I think I cut it out there.
But it's it's that somewhat attractive woman that
was there, the small features, and she was
used right at the beginning and then kind
of pushed aside. But she she was
one of the extremist guys. She's radical.
And it says,
if the regularization law is invalidated,
this is what she said. I thought her
name was right there. I guess it's I
guess it's right above this.
So she says, if the regularization law is
invalidated. So if we end up being pushed
back because it's blatantly illegal,
it says there's a series of administrative decisions
that the attorney general has already made
and stands behind
that regularizes
most of the settlements anyway. Oh, cool. So
this is just state writing into law the
illegal act we're taking. And even if you
don't let it happen, we're gonna do it
anyway.
That's what that so that's what it looks
like to not have an independent judiciary.
This is a broken system just like ours,
by the way. And it says prime minister
Benjamin Netanyahu knows that this bill is immoral,
unconstitutional,
and will certainly do Israel great damage internationally.
Netanyahu also knows that the law will be
struck down by the high court of justice,
which will then be smeared mercilessly by the
settler right and its Knesset representatives.
But it says Netanyahu's trapped.
He knows the good of the country requires
the bill be buried for good.
But on the other hand,
he hears Smotrich declare,
if it doesn't come up for a vote
Monday, there will be no government.
So Netanyahu knows if I don't have a
government, I'm gonna go to prison. So I
guess I'm stuck.
So the good of the country
or staying out of prison.
Sounds like our government.
It's where we are.
And it says, if there's one thing Netanyahu
longs for, long is Netanyahu's long years at
the helm have proven,
it's that when asked to choose between the
good of the country and its political survival,
the country will always come second.
I've been telling you that forever. It's a
public sentiment.
And yet, we treat the US government treats
him with the utmost respect even now even
though he's now an ICC criminal.
Well, here's a follow-up the next day. Israel
passes the Palestinian land grab bill and a
late night vote. Israeli lawmakers on Monday evening
passed 60 to 52, a contentious bill that
would retroactively legalize
stealing Palestinian land. And, by the way, and
here's why it matters.
And
the move
could kill the chances of a peace deal.
See how every time this happens?
And they go, the they didn't take the
no. The point was the deal was coming.
It got close, and you rolled this out,
which then destroyed the chances of that deal,
and you blame them like you do every
single time.
We can't deny this anymore. The public statements
are there. It's all out there. Even even
Ben Gavir has admitted that he sabotaged multiple
deals. That's the reality, guys. And he did
it in one part for this reason. And
it says there were fears that the vote
would be delayed, but Netanyahu told reporters
earlier Monday that it would go ahead as
planned after he briefed the White House on
the vote. Far right lawmaker Smotrich praised the
bill's passage into law, saying it was a
historic day for the settlement movement. You know,
the illegal movement that the world already sees
illegal.
Today, Israel decreed that developing settlement
in Judea and Samaria or the West Bank
is in Israeli interest. So he just said
that the illegal thing that the world to
claim even the US as illegal,
we just solidified the law as our direction.
Yes, guys. Obviously.
And yet from this point to today, they
still deny it. It says, from here, we
move on to expanding
Israeli sovereignty
and continuing to build and develop settlements across
the land.
Be clear. He does not just mean Palestine.
It says, B'Tselem,
the leading human rights group in Israel, condemned
the bill's passage, saying it proves yet again
that Israel has no intention
of ending its control over the Palestinians or
its theft of their land.
Lending a semblance of legality to this ongoing
act of plunder is a disgrace
or the state and its legislature.
It says passing the bill mere weeks after
UN Security Council Resolution
2334,
that's the potential deal, is a slap in
the face of the international community
While in short wait a minute. Maybe not
actually. I thought that was a deal. Or
but either way, there's 1 or 2 things.
One of them was the potential deal. The
other one was the conversation about whether they
are allowed to continue to annex, which they're
not. That's the point. It's always been illegal.
So either way, it's an insult to people
that they thought Israel pretend to be part
of the whole process.
In practice, it's yet another facet of the
massive land grab carried out openly for decades
by declaring state land.
Israeli media, Israeli human rights groups, and yet
your bought off politicians lie about it.
It says Peace Now called the passage a
stain on the Knesset, and it bears the
signature of a single person,
Benjamin
Netanyahu, who abandons Israel's future for the hands
of an extremist minority.
That's the way it is now. And supports
a law that he and the attorney general
have warned against.
See that? It says Netanyahu is willing to
enable the theft of land to endanger Israeli
army officers and drag Israel into the International
Court of Justice in The Hague,
and all for the sake of his own
political survival. In the face of this madness,
we will be the responsible adult,
and we shall block this dangerous law in
the Israel's court of high justice, which as
far as I could tell didn't happen.
But overall,
think about this writing about this is the
same way. I mean, the only way you
can make sense of people on this side
of the world pretending that's not the case
is because something's wrong.
I don't know how we could pretend otherwise.
Now in the West Bank, since we're talking
about it briefly, I want you to see,
don't forget,
the the
genocide has extended. This is not this this
is not even an abuse of the word.
They are now doing
identical practices to what they just did in
Gaza, in in the West Bank. They cut
off the electricity. They're bombing locations, buildings full
of people. They're scooped they're ethnically cleansing. They're
bulldozing houses. They're ripping up streets. It's the
same thing.
And
on the 25th, they killed this 3 year
old girl, a child
in Janine.
Ravi Adul from human rights,
hu EuroMed Human Rights Group, the Israeli occupation
has just notified the 26th
all the residents of Al Neman, Al Neman
Village,
East of Bethlehem,
of its intention to demolish all of their
homes and forcibly to place them.
Publicly,
everybody's gotta leave.
Who we're not talking about Hamas. We're not
talking about Human Shield. We're going move out
of the way. We're gonna destroy all your
homes because we want the land.
They don't even care anymore.
Because, look, if they've gotten away this long,
they I guarantee you, they think there's nothing
gonna happen.
Let's prove them wrong.
Suppressed news, this is on the 31st.
The Israeli army has just stormed a Palestinian
wedding in Hebron and abducted the groom while
he was next to his bride.
What was supposed to be the happiest moment
for a couple turned out to be their
worst because of Israel?
Because it's just disgusting.
And then this this ends up being a
person who gets arrested for no reason, spends
15 years in jail, and gets released way
down the line when they wanna use him
for a token.
Zion not Zionism's Observer points out that they're
now publicly telling you guys, this is a
quote from Katz, after the operation, the IDF
troop will remain in the camp
to make sure terror doesn't return. There wasn't
terror in the 1st place. This was a
controlled area by by Israel. This is the
West Bank. That they they just took part
of the West Bank, and they're saying we're
never leaving.
All you cowards out there that are pretense
about something other than the obvious
are just part of the problem,
which I don't think is the majority.
Speak up. They also just said we're never
leaving Syria.
It's not hard to see what's going on,
guys. The people in Syria are the terrorists
they support.
Suppress News points out Israel occupation forces carry
on an airstrike targeting a vehicle in the
West Bank.
Ware strikes?
Demolition?
If there was any justice in this world,
everybody everywhere would be calling this out. There's
no way around this. This is objectively illegal
in every possible way.
He also points out, Israeli soldiers filmed themselves
occupying a home in the West Bank just
to watch TV after terrorizing and spilling the
residents. Right.
So exactly like what happened in Gaza, in
the West Bank.
These people are monsters.
They're sick.
Now here is a group of Jewish people.
As Dan Cohen highlights, what kind of Jewish
state sends uniform secular thugs to assault Jews
for practicing their religion?
Israel is the unJewish state.
This constantly happens.
Now, here is as Patrick Henningsen points out,
a pogrom.
Zionist murdered 10 Palestinians in the occupied West
Bank on the 29th. The West is silent
because it is a partner in the slaughter
and genocide.
You watch the video. It's just the it's
the, you know, kind of coverage of the
police covering and dealing. It's this these are
Israeli settlers who are being allowed and men
in most cases, backed up by the IDF
to rape, pillage, and murder.
I'm not being facetious. That's what they're doing.
On top of that, in Lebanon, because it's
not stopping there either, Israel dropped bombs on
a children's amusement park
in southern Lebanon.
What's the argument?
Are pretending that there are Hamas in tunnels
under there or it doesn't even matter?
They they are they are a hateful people.
These Zionist Israelis that are doing this.
I just don't know why, and it doesn't
matter. It's just it it kills me.
Not a military target, children playing. On top
of that, just bombing civilian homes in Lebanon.
But, here's a ritz from the 30th of
this year.
There's no Auschwitz in Gaza, but it's still
genocide.
This is precisely what genocide looks like, says
an Israeli Jew writing for the leading Israeli
platform.
And she says, ask yourself why Israeli historians
and media publicly acknowledge Israel's genocide, but the
US media won't.
You know why. It's really not that difficult.
And this is Jonathan Cook.
30 years of Middle East lies just keep
coming back to haunt us. And he says
the West war on terror was built on
a series of deceptions to persuade us that
our leaders were crushing Islamist extremism.
In truth, they were nourishing it. And that's
the biggest secret that's not really a secret.
They were arming the people they were using
to claim they were fighting, and all they
were doing was destabilizing the people that they
claim they're protecting.
In most case, Christians.
You know why? Because that's what Israel's agenda
was. It's about the easiest thing in this
conversation to prove.
And he just makes a point about the
Oslo Accords and how the prime minister made
sure to to to basically sabotage
the deal. I mean, this is what they've
been doing for as long as you can
remember. In this case, they stormed the Al
Aqsa Mosque in order to make this happen.
Now Mohammad Safa points out, there's never been
a war in history, and hear this,
where 80% of the country has been destroyed,
100%
of the population displaced, and 50% of the
children killed,
or 50% of the death children.
Think about that for a second, guys. There's
no precedent here. No. The gay or most
moral army.
There's just no misunderstanding
that.
Now,
getting into the point about how this overlaps
using the avail of equitableness.
Using the manipulation of this to trap you
in the idea of fighting this while trapping
you inside the prison they're building.
Sassy red sox makes an interesting point.
She says she says this d head has
a lot to answer for.
So this guy says, doom and gloom goes
proof begone. 10 days of darkness. He goes,
Donald Trump took away CBDCs, which not really.
That a lot of these I'm I won't
say it every time, but most of these
are shell game side steps. Right? So for
example, CBDC for the private stable coin, which
is way worse. It's coming, guys. Ever we've
been writing about just about every other part
of this. The point is,
I'd say for all, but he goes on
and say, Trump took away WHO. Trump took
away FEMA. Trump took away DEI. Okay. Trump
took away Paris Climate Agreement.
Then he says,
these were the basic requirements for the new
world order, and there's the issue.
No. They're not. It says, do you now
see how they're moving away from negative timeline?
So the point she's making, and this is
the point I keep seeing. I keep highlighting.
They have made a dynamic here where you
fall into this, where you think all you're
trying to fight is the woke democrat agenda.
If you think for one second that another
understand. CBDCs,
yes.
That's very clear. But see, they didn't stop
that. That's still happening. But the WHO,
well, there's still many overlaps with plenty of
dynamics. Even through Bill Gates and what's happening,
that still exists.
Or
FEMA, different point there, but DEI. But all
this is about the idea. Paris Climate Accord
is about fighting that agenda. These are important
aspects.
But if you think for one second that
what they're building right now is about DEI,
is about pronouns or climate or climate change.
You're missing everything that's happening around you.
Right now, those things seem to be the
sidestep.
I mean, how do we miss the AI
infrastructure, the MRA dynamic, the
the the the wild wireless body area networks,
the nanotechnology.
All these things are rapidly coming out, and
they're using I mean, the the National Reconnaissance
Office spy satellite network they're building. I mean,
everything.
It is what the North America Union.
But
they took away pronouns, so we're winning. So
this is the point I keep making. These
things matter, but they've used this as my
and this is my opinion as she's highlighting
to make you think that this is what
it was built on. And now we're done.
And she simply says, he doesn't understand that
nothing we have now will be in the
New World Order. Absolutely nothing we'll we will
have will survive. That's why Trump is so
publicly allowed to tear it all down.
Sleight of hand. Trump is taking out the
old and putting in the new.
Stargate data center 6 g vaccines.
She's right. And this clip is just about
RFK saying he's pro vaccine.
But think about that.
It's if you and this is I I
don't know if I would say everything, but
the idea of allowing them to tear down
what won't matter once this comes out is
so transparent.
And the fed won't really matter if we're
rolling out a CBDC, but I don't even
see that begin to happen because I don't
think they'll do that just in fear that
they won't finish.
Again very transparent but all the different things
we're seeing
so tommy lauren seems to at least be
recognizing this I see a lot of them
doing it
She says the whole DEI conversation's gotten out
of
hand. She says, no. The word is not
against you nor do you deserve special perks
if you are our marginalized race, gender, sexuality,
etcetera. Or no. The world, she said. I
agree.
Laura, I mean, the point is even if
you think but there are plenty of examples
of the world that's against a lot of
people regardless of their agenda, religion, but that
seems to play a central role today.
The point is regardless of that, it's your
choice to feel like a victim and feel,
you know, in any context. Even if you
truly are. If you lean into that, I
think it's a detriment to you. But either
way, you do not deserve our special perks.
Like, let's just be clear to get into
all the side nuances.
Meritocracy, guys. It's amazing that we have to
pretend or anyone would even disagree with that.
Like, it's crazy that you would stand there
and go, no. It has to be about
some kind of, you know, affirmative action dynamic.
And it's like, well, guys, that is racism
in and of itself. If we're simply saying
the person who's best suited for the job
should get the job, then that makes sense
in every context. Now, yes, what happens in
the past is people then abuse that. Right?
Where they say they're doing that, but then
they only hire their white friends or whatever
you wanna say. Well, that happens in any
context. You could pretend it's about the
diversity hires, and they could, like and we
could see again, only hire certain it's the
same thing. So the reality becomes that people
will do. That's called freedom. So I say
we pull it all the way back and
let people hire whoever the f they want.
But the reality overall
is that in most cases, all things being
equal, people hire people that will benefit their
job, benefit their business, which tends to be
the best person for the job. If you
wanna let somebody only hire a certain race,
that will hurt them in the long run,
guys, for a 1000000 different reasons. Either way,
the government sticking their fingers in to make
whatever happen is not the answer. So that's
my point. So we're all in agreement there.
None and on top of that then or
rather the main point is then this becomes
something that it gets over focused on. And
I argue they built that up so it
could be tear torn down.
But she says, however,
conservatives would do better not to immediately label
anything and everything a product of DEI.
So at least she sees that. It's the
same as antisemitism, guys. It's a gay it's
it's a manipulation
in order to broad stroke
so you think something's happening. It's it's a
game.
It cheapens the argument to throw it around
as such a catchall. Can we just stop?
She says, I agree.
There is very real DEI dynamic that are
that that should be stopped. That are, I
think, counterproductive
or really damaging
for a lot of different things.
But I wrote, but, Tommy, this is partisanship.
That's exactly how it works. It's assumptive,
tribal, and largely based on group think and
broad stroke generalizations of the, quote, other side.
You know this well. You've used it yourself.
Serial engagement. My god. I can't even look
at these things again. That's wild. That was,
what, 3 days ago?
I mean, simply for going after somebody, people
go.
I'm telling you guys, we are wildly suppressed
right now. But either way,
the point is simple.
Part we all know this. This is what
partisanship does. Right? You you lean into the
assumption. What's fun on a funny note, I
don't think I included it.
Musk put out this study or he quoted
it with an emoji of a study that
was claiming that if you have higher testosterone
levels than man, you tend to go lean
more into what you believe even if it
count goes against what the majority believes, whereas
low t
lean into agreeing with the majority. Well, I'm
like, well, it seems like you're a, you
know, the the what do they call it?
The beta cock low t low t male
Pied Piper. It's like because I mean, the
reality is it's both ways. It's not just
like it's not right. It's left and right.
Partisans,
as anybody objective knows, follow the lead. They
follow the group, guys. So that's funny that
he would point to it. But that's the
same as pointing to anything else, pointing to
a a meme about free speech when you're
literally censoring people. It's pretty sunny. But that
proves it. Right? He pointed to the meme,
so he must be the guy. But the
overall point, guys, is this is out of
hand, and it is being used against you.
Yes. Even crazier. If you think you're fighting
these things, I'm willing to argue that by
leaning into it the way you're doing it
now is only gonna actually make it stronger.
Watch.
Israel uses these things against you, and your
government is very clearly rolling that out.
Now, again, as I said,
my thought on this
like, if you look at it a broad
sense, if you stand back and look at
it all, I I think that what they've
done is allowed this to be ridiculous. So
we've seen this before in many different context
where they've allowed it to get, like, ludicrously
out of hand
so that it it it almost justifies a
problem or action solution. So they make a
what? And they how is this even still
here? Like, this is wild and it's hurting
children. Anybody would agree with that that's looking
at the facts.
And then what they do is they allow
that to all be cut like we're seeing.
All the DEI programs and we go, yay.
We're winning. Look at that. We cut all
these things down. They they were they were
rye they were they were brought up to
be brought down. That's my theory.
And then, of course, we'll see monumentally increased
spending around artificial intelligence or whatever else because
China.
And then I this is my my prediction
on this. Mark my words.
The very people that were telling you that
they were gonna be cutting spending and reducing
government will spend the rest of this administration
selling you on why it's necessary because China.
Which, again, maybe that's not an unfair argument,
but this is the thing I do every
time. I wasn't telling you in the beginning
which way or why or how. I simply
said, oh, I don't think that's gonna happen.
I think spending will increase and government will
increase because it always does.
No. He promised. Okay. And now I I
that's where I see it going, where they're
gonna point to the the token 1,000,000,000 well,
well, I'll show you in a second. We
cut a $1,000,000,000. That's that's a lot of
money.
But when you just a lot when you
just put out a 100,000,000,000 for the first
rollout of the AI, another 400,000,000,000 to follow,
and even he said probably over $500,000,000,000,
do you really think you're gonna somehow slash
enough things to undercut just that? Not even
getting into all the other spending that will
come.
That almost guarantees that you're not gonna cut
spending, that at the end of the day,
you'll be spending more.
Even though you could yeah. Yes. We did
slash these things. Overall, you didn't cut. My
point is at the end of the 4
years, if you ultimately spent more than you
cut off, it's it's a wash. We're that's
I think it's gonna be more.
But that's my point. I think it's a
game. And so that's what I think this
is about. It's about building this up so
that it can be brought down. So you
feel like you just won, but ultimately, it'll
be, oh, we'll just we now we have
to because of some new thing.
Now here's Doge,
department of government efficiency, which by the way
is it's it's not. I mean, this is
an advisory role. It is not a new
department. So as always, they're they're kinda tricking
you with that. They just rename the digital
services point. But who knows what'll happen after,
you know, they could change, they could do
something different. But as of now, it's supposed
to go away after 2 years.
But they just simply post this. And this
is what I think is so funny.
Department of government efficiency says through 129,
85 of these related contracts, totally 1,000,000,000 have
been terminated. Okay. I mean, I don't I
actually I'm I I actually think I believe
it happened. Without even looking into it, I
would argue this most likely happened just because
of just deductive
logic. But I I wouldn't I I wouldn't
assume.
My point is I'm willing to bet you
that the vast majority of people,
and I can prove it based on the
timing this came out before there was even
really any more information, were just going, there
you go.
Articles written about it, quoting just this tweet
and saying, there you go. They cut all
this pro
did you check it?
Are you sure?
Just because he texted it out on Twitter
does not prove. But this is where we
are. We're in the land of Twitter files
now. He said it, so therefore we know.
And he says, doge just now save taxpayer
of $1,000,000,000
in DEI contracts. Okay.
I mean, it it it ultimately, this is
a a token where you shave these things
off and then grow the surveillance state exponentially.
Well, that won't really matter, will it?
In a larger sense, especially since what we're
walking into is what we keep telling you.
So the DEI feels like a distraction.
But here's Fox. Doge announces more than 1,000,000,000
in savings after 104.
Okay. Well, it's 2 days later. But if
you read this, what you'll notice,
they don't have any other source material.
All they have is a tweet
from this Department of Government Efficiency
with a bunch of names on it. And
then goes back to this one. Same point.
I'm of the mind that it probably happened.
But what's interesting
is Fox News is reporting on this because
it was tweeted
from a group that has has been lying
consistently,
like every government entity, but they have. And
then it says updated data.
And they show you another screenshot. Wouldn't it
be great to have a link so you
can actually look at these things? But you're
I think a lot of what's going on
right now is meant to be opaque. And
and and they they want that. They know
the people supporting it won't complain about it
because they don't wanna make them look bad.
So now you're essentially allowing the system where
they just tell you what's going on and
we can't verify, but you know, because they're
trust they they're on our side.
But how about this?
Okay. Department of Agriculture,
11.
Contracts,
$112,000,000.
Okay. How do you know those are bad
pro programs?
Because they said, right?
I mean, yeah. I I guarantee all these
things are overwhelmed with woke politics. Okay. But
how do you know that those 11 contracts
have anything to do with that? Maybe they're
boxing out all the people that are fighting
the deep state. Of course, that would never
happen because they promised and they said
I just think it's again, I wanna be
clear. I I'm not saying I think even
think that. I'm just saying it's interesting how
we're at a point where you
left and right
are being
led by
insinuation,
screenshots.
Right? I mean, even if you go in
and look at the contracts for the part
of agriculture, like, are if you is every
I mean, you get the point. It's very
clear to me that this is and we're
gonna get to a point where they're doing
whatever they want, and they just say it
out loud, and they tell you that I
mean, the the news reports what the label
was.
It's pretty wild to me right now. Now
we just talked about this, the
unconstitutional executive order. It's the same conversation.
Because the executive order about antisemitism,
at the core of it, is about what
Republicans feel they're fighting Democrats.
That's why it seems most of these Republicans
are unable, unwilling to call out how unconstitutional
this is.
Because apparently, only ones doing this are terrorists
and Democrats.
But that's not true.
It's quite alarming how this how well this
is working. Now we just showed you this.
This is the additional measures to combat antisemitism.
The main thing to look at because that
we again, over overall, we're talking about students
and visas. Well, they're protected under the constitutional
rights just like you.
It's easily proven.
And so all they're doing is taking one
further step in like, isn't it amazing how
ever you know, Obama would blink hard and
we'd scream about a violation of our rights.
Right? Or Clinton?
Now this guy is literally rolling something out
that directly violates your con but no. No.
It's okay because those guys are bad.
It's just sad how easily this was people
fall for this. But all the rest of
them is about, you know, the overarching point
about going after antisemitism, which is unconstitutional.
Because on top of it, because most of
these people are not and they're fighting for
Palestine. But even if they egregiously hate semites,
which is not Israelis,
then
it's
a thought
or a belief.
If they take action that is illegal,
violence, harassment, those are already crimes. So all
you're doing is enshrining the idea that you're
not allowed to have a thought if it's
against something that Israel doesn't like.
And
visas,
students are protected in international or under constitutional
rights.
Number 2
says very clearly, it shall be the policy
of the United States to combat it. The
samatism vigorously
using all available inappropriate legal terms, tools to
prosecute, remove, or otherwise hold to account the
perpetrators of unlawful
anti Semitic harassment and violence. Which in this
case, because of what they just wrote here,
unlawful and unlawful anti Semitic harassment would be
saying Zionism is not his, Jew Judaism.
So
Americans and this is what even Michael Tracey
made this point. Anybody honest? It's very clear
that applies to anybody, not just foreign students.
Americans,
they're claiming to be prosecuted, removed, or otherwise
hold to account if you simply say something
that they claim is anti semitic.
If you're lying to yourself about this, it's
gonna come back to bite you.
Now, my point again is this is about
using woke politics to a to convince conservatives
and Republicans that you're not watching the destruction
of your everything you believe.
Zachary Foster points out this in Harvard.
At Harvard University, students are allowed to call
the US a racist endeavor.
They they can call Canada, Mexico, the UK,
France, Germany, racist countries.
They can they can call every country in
the world racist
except for 1,
Israel.
Welcome to Higher Education Circa 2025.
So think about this now.
They're going after WOKE, DEI, all all that.
Right? They're going after everybody for allowing them
to do
this. Except this one's okay because it's about
the pro the group they wanna protect.
It is wild hypocrisy.
These are the bro flakes. These are the
woke right. That's what we're staring at. The
people that pretend this is not the same
censorship of hate speech.
It's just embarrassing.
A lot of people see it.
Harvard University will adopt the definition of anti
semitism. It's the same thing. You're not allowed
to criticize Israel. Otherwise, you're a racist.
Only Israel out of every country in the
world.
And Max Blumenthal says, while the US Supreme
Court has ruled burning an American flag as
protected speech,
Americans have been charged with hate crimes across
the country over the past year
for burning a flag of the apartheid state
of Israel.
Does the constitution now contain a Zionist exception?
I hope you're hearing this.
Simon, Goddeck pointed this out. Well, why why
do you tolerate Trump gutting the first amendment
just to shield one small powerful minority from
criticism?
You either stand for the first amendment in
full, or you stand for tyranny.
And he gets into debate about whether the
first amendment protects everyone, even illegal. It's true.
And it's obvious. I went into the actual
details on legal sites yester yesterday.
Just to add it all, add what Glenn
Greenwald pointed out.
So many people falsely believe the US constitution
only applies to US citizens.
The Supreme Court has held for 200 years.
It restrains the US government relating to anyone
legally on US soil.
Yick Wo versus Hopkins upheld due process rights
for a Chinese national in California.
And it this is the article president Donald
Trump is expected to sign an executive order
today threatening action against international students in the
United States. But we as we just showed
you, it's more than that. It applies to
Americans. But on top of that, as Glenn
also would point out in extended I've seen
this conversation. I think he might even be
down here. Is the point that that even
an illegal illegal alien
as as it's been ruled by supreme court
in numerous examples. Look it up at the
legal breakdown. It'll show you this. Are also
protected,
but there are certain carve outs. Right? Like,
so if you're there and you commit a
crime other than the idea of illegal immigration,
for example, then I think there's carve outs
there. But and you would look. That's worthy
of debate. Right? You could argue by simply
breaking the law. I mean but see, this
is where you get into the reality of
what these are. These are not
handed to you. These are not things that
could be given or taken away. They're inherent,
god given rights.
That's why it still applies to an illegal
alien or America that's broken the law. Same
point.
It's just sad that we can't be honest
about this because
foreign government politics.
But here's where it gets even more interesting,
guys. Yeah. I'm sure you saw this too.
John Kennedy says, they, them, are now was,
were. Oh, you're so funny.
Well, pronouns to be removed from federal email
signatures.
What was that again about free speech?
I mean, guys, this is embarrassing. Now I'll
be the first to say that I think
pronouns are stupid. The idea that you have
to put them but why would you not
be allowed to? Isn't that just the same
thing in reverse?
Obviously.
But it's so frustrating that we have to
be the ones to say that.
I'm not saying you have to do it
or you should. The bottom line is if
you wanna write whatever you want after your
name on your signature, the government shouldn't be
allowed to tell you otherwise. Here's Donald Trump
and all these woke right politicians and broadcasters
coming out and saying, yeah, stupid Democrats. You
can't do.
You guys are hypocrites. Every single one of
you.
Here's one of them. Libs of TikTok, breaking.
Trump ordered a sweeping memorandum, which by the
way, I don't even know how you think
that applies to people writing signatures. An executive
order or an executive,
what there's executive orders and executive statements
that effectively eliminate gender ideology from federal government.
Okay? But 5 PM today, the following changes
will be made. And before you even read
them,
gender ideology,
to be clear,
in regard to an individual is your personal
beliefs and what you think.
We're at thoughtcrime level here now, guys. My
point is that if we're gonna talk about
this and what should be changed is the
idea that we should not be allowing governments
to institute these things in schools. They shouldn't
be teaching children. This is about you and
your own personal beliefs.
But here's what it says. Terminate contracts, programs,
and grants that include gender ideology.
So right even there, I'm of the mind
personally that I do think these programs are
problematic.
But this gets into a different point about
whether or not Trump can unilaterally with a
memorandum
change what has congressionally been approved for funding.
Even if I disagree with it. This is
my point from before is we have to
realize that there is a process to this
and it what he's doing
gets to the point to where they're essentially
taking control of the
like, right now, let's be real. Congress hasn't
approved war since world war 2.
They that so they're already it's this is
showing you one other step where you have
other what I think are foreign governments,
reducing
what even the illusion of us having an
influence on this and coming down to one
person they put in power to dictate what
can happen. Now, with Doge and the rest
of them kind of what they wrote, taking
the purse, especially when we can't see ethics
pledges and we can't we know there are
Israeli funding and manipulation,
pledges and we can't we know there are
Israeli funding and manipulation
dictating their choices, it's quite concerning that they
now have that much control over $6,000,000,000,000
of money.
Doesn't it? But not to people that wanna
pretend all they're doing is fighting woke Democrats
because then you're the pro. See how that
works?
It says any no. You get back to
this point, terminate contracts. That's the main point.
Then it says any employee whose job involves
gender ideology must be placed on leave.
So what it depends I mean, that I
agree, generally. I just don't these are broad
stroke comments. Any idea that involves gender ideology,
I'm willing to bet you will begin to
overlap with things that you know, how about
how about you wanna bet this kind of
overlaps with the abortion conversation?
Even though that's a very different conversation and
is very politically driven and both sides have
a very different opinion. But it says remove
all websites and social media accounts that promote
gender ideology. Now here is an interesting point.
Isn't that censorship?
Now, do they mean only government websites? And
if they do, then I'm okay with that.
The idea that the government should not be
involved in promoting
sexual ideology to anybody.
But it's interesting. Right? Because I you can
see where there begins to be an opaque
part of this where maybe they just start
getting rid of other websites, which interesting. But
it says, terminate email systems with the pronoun
prompt. Now that is my that's where I'm
really getting at.
Now if you're talking about a government, you
know,
part of it, which is what the kind
of what they're saying right there, which is
like, so it makes you do it. Okay.
I agree with that.
Same with the it's but see, I would
willing to bet you that we already see
examples of them doing similar things in the
other side of this,
where they have to do something. You know,
it's how this is the left right game.
None of them want your rights or freedom.
They don't care. They wanna use the same
problem against you in the way they like,
and their side cheers for it. But it
says with all withdraw all orders and regulations
that promote gender ideology, cancel all trainings that
promote gender ideology,
Disband resource groups that promote gender ideology. All
forms should only give options for male or
female.
Replace the word gender with sex in all
documents. In the intimate intimate spaces should all
be based on sex, not gender identity. Now
mostly agree with all of this.
What they're saying though with some of these
things
in regard to the forms replacing I mean,
so the main point overall
is the pronoun aspect for that that's what
he was just saying and what they're all
really hyping about. Better employees told to remove
pronouns from email signatures by the end of
the day.
Right? So under the guise
of fighting these things, which I don't think
I think these are not like I said
before,
and just in case it's unclear, I 100%
disagree with this whole dynamic. Like, in the
sense that we should not be pushing this
on people. This should not be a government
dynamic. The entire idea of gender ideology, I
think, is a complete manipulation. Just so that's
clear, even though it should be blatantly obvious
from all my work I've done, but we
know how things get manipulated today. But overall,
under the guys, I think, because a lot
of this is about hiding what's really happening,
they're censoring people.
If they're not allowed to write their own
pronouns in their emails, then you're censoring people.
And I think that's silly. And just it's
the same example we've shown before about
getting people fired for making jokes. Here's loads
of TikTok.
Pete Buttigieg removed his pronouns for his bio.
Okay? So
the idea being that they're being told to
do that.
How is that not the same thing in
reverse?
And I simply said, we're the media now.
Like like that's something to be reported. Like
that's just a petty, small,
embarrassing thing to promote.
But because in my point is, this is
being built as what they're fighting. Like, this
is a win. We just succeeded because they
don't put pronouns, their names.
Like, how easy you guys are to manipulate.
Now, this is the picture I use today.
Large point.
This guy says,
this photograph was taken 2 days ago at
the FBI Academy in Quantico
and submitted to the New York Times
under the condition of anonymity.
It says, if a picture is usually worth
a 1000 words, this one is a 1000000
words worth a 1000000.
Okay.
Now if you see the picture for the
podcast,
it's a wall, like a like a collage
of words. Right? I think there's a word
for that. I forget.
And it says
fairness,
leadership,
compassion,
integrity,
stability,
and, yes, diversity.
One says respect,
and they're painting over it because those are
democrat things.
I mean, do I even need to explain
that? Like, this old this the idea of
this
is is all this is the kind of
thing we're talking about. So now fairness and
leadership and compassion, yes. Screw that.
But because you feel it's woke,
you're just I mean, it's just such a
silly stupid thing. Like, what what do you
think you just changed here? The world has
changed. No. You didn't do anything. The FBI
is still around. They're still setting up Americans.
They're rolling out your technocratic prison. But good
thing we covered up all those words. Like,
this is my point from before. The idea
of diversity.
The quality or condition of being diverse.
The condition of having or including people from
different ethnicities and social backgrounds. A variety of
okay.
Wouldn't you want a diversity of opinion, of
a diversity of of choices? I mean, this
diversity is not a bad word
in the way it's being applied, where you're
then forcing
woke politics on people or hiring people because
of their ethnicity, which, by the way, is
racism.
Then, yeah, that's that's bad.
But what's happened is they've now turned this
in inverted this. This is the great inversion.
And now, you guys are acting like this
is a bad thing. Or
that compassion,
leadership, fairness. Yeah. Those are woke things.
Right? Those what, you know, the the I'm
a man. I don't think like that. I
drink you know, it's this dumb thing. They've
tricked you all into being as stupid as
possible.
Sustainability
is a very positive thing. But just like
we saw, because it was focused on and
they weren't actually doing that, in fact, what
they were doing was destroying sustainability,
but it became bad.
Now, sustainability is a bad thing. But not
for intelligent people, but for a lot of
partisan people. And so my point in this
is if you think this is a win,
if you think you somehow succeeded by having
them paint over a wall of mostly, I
think, entirely positive words
because that's woke, then you're missing the you've
you've lost the plot. In fact, you've taken
the bait, and you're being led down a
path where you miss what's really happening.
Now, again, if you didn't hear me in
the beginning, it's clear that these things in
me the the
for example, the trans ideology that's affecting your
children in general is a horrifying thing that
needs to be stopped.
Or the idea that you're putting people in
positions for jobs that are not the best
person for the job. That's that's obvious.
But these are real world realities, not the
fact that somebody can call themselves what they
want or you can say your own pronouns.
Like, it's sad that this is what people
pretend is the point.
Arnaubetrand,
different perspective on this, which I think some
may agree, disagree with. But this first, Tom
says,
so Doge are are bragging today that they
got DEI Scholarships for Burma canceled.
That's my point from before. All these things
they're pointing to to say, look at all
this stuff we slashed. Well, if you dig
through it, you're gonna find plenty of stuff
that's not even remotely what you would argue
as DEI.
It's just stuff that was passed by Democrats
or Biden or whatever. So what it says
is these are US aids. So from my
perspective, US aid in general should be gone.
I think these are terrible things that are
actually hurting by far more than they're helping.
But it says,
Lincoln Scholarships which help young people struggling for
freedom in Burma's dictatorship,
which by the way, we can get into
the reality of why that is and who's
supporting the you know, same old story. But
it says a cause Americans have supported and
a Republican
and Democrat presidents.
Okay. So it's bipartisan.
Following up on the 45,000,000 in DEI Scholarships
to Burma is being canceled.
Well, here's what our our nod says.
The layer of irony in the US ending
its own foreign interference programs, which he sees
this stuff like USAID because it somehow propagandized
itself into thinking it was a good hearted
DEI foreign aid are literally too rich to
unpack. Now, again, the other
because he frames it as good hearted DEI,
like, obviously, there's far more surreptitious around that
that I think than any than any positive.
But aside from that, it's hilarious to think
about that. Like,
US aid
is a 4 is a Trojan horse for
regime change. And so what's hilarious is effectively
they're removing these things under the guise of
fighting that ultimately
is hurting what their agenda is. But, of
course, you could argue that's what they're secretly
doing, but they're not. It's obvious. They just
bombed Somalia. They're gonna continue the same
foreign policy.
They're funding Ukraine. They're continuing the genocide. Let's
not pretend it's not obvious. So overall,
I think it's I do think it's interesting
that this was ultimately
not what they thought it was. In some
cases, you could argue this was actually genuinely
helping people. But it says, anyhow, the end
result is that you end up in the
hilarious situation where a bunch of die hard
imperialists are achieving through confusion the wet dream
of generations of anti imperialist activists. It says
next step, the national down for democracy, hopefully.
I swear you guys, it's very, very DEI
and woke.
Point being, maybe we could trick them into
thinking it's woke, and maybe they'll actually stop
something that's good. Overall,
if you look into this,
I'd I'd argue that scholarships people in Burma,
it's not DEI at all. It's ultimately helping
people. But I would argue a step before
that, though, that it shouldn't be the responsibility
of anybody, lest unless they want to do
it, to help people
in any location, in any context. So that's
where I would argue that becomes that kind
of direction. But is it woke politics
to help people struggling under a government that's
been for helped by our you know, it's
the same conversation everywhere?
Well, not really.
Caitlin Johnstone simply makes a point. And, again,
you could fill the first party with whatever
story you want or whatever. You know, this
burning down capitalism
sets entire ocean on fire, she says. Democrats.
Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump. Republicans, DEI.
And again, it's it's a nonpartisan point. It's
the reality is that both sides are completely
lost in the game.
You get these morons in congress screaming about
things we can prove aren't true against somebody
who is doing good work in health. Meanwhile,
the same guy supporting a genocide, RFK Junior,
and they're all pretending they're fighting woke politics.
Meanwhile, technocratic prison gets built. I am RNA
cancer shots are coming out. AI infrastructure is
being written. I mean, obviously, that should be
the focus. But here we are.
Now, we'll talk about
the the the crash overlap because it's interesting
how the DEI conversation came into play. Right?
Pauli Saint George says helicopter crash story being
pushed everywhere successfully, covers up the Trump anti
semitism combat Trump executive order to combat anti
semitism. Now, it's always I agree. I do
think there's very clear now, it doesn't always
mean it's manufactured.
I think when there's a moment when they
really don't want to see something or hide
something, that they do it.
They being the the hierarchy enslaving you. It
could be one group here, one group there.
The power structure
decides to take something and make it into
a big story.
It's very easy to see how that happens.
And I simply use the little cat meme
I've used, you know, the dangly cat toy.
That's what we're talking about. What happened in
this crash over here? And, you know, yes.
It's a story that should matter. Obviously, it's
a news story, so that's crazy. But the
fact that it kind of eclipsed the entire
news cycle for days,
that's not normal. And that's my point. It
becomes not just a story, but then it
becomes 75 different building theories that all are
true that Jones covers every other day. That's
usually how this works.
So first,
Whitney, of course, plucking out the point that
really, I think interestingly enough, I almost wonder
whether this was meant to be the point
that gets taken out, that they then just
jumped over the top of and went right
to woke politics because that agenda is working
too well. But interestingly,
continuity of government got pulled out of this.
The he TEGSETH said this publicly,
which is very concerning for those of us
that are, you know, aware that the continuity
of government is the deep state. Right? That
is the shadow government built under the Reagan
or even before. But it is a parallel
government structure.
Groups actually involved there. There's meant to be
sort of this constant of government dynamic. Now
the way they firm it today is that
it's like just the practices they keep up
to make sure they're prepared for if something
bad happened. And it's just that's really not
the full picture.
If you look into it, the history of
the Whitney and I talked about, it is
the shadow government
that never that seemed to have never gone
away.
But she says, here's a primer on what
top national security officials mean when they say
continuity of government. Here's the link for you.
Include this for you.
What Newsweek conveniently failed to mention about continuity
of governments? They wrote this in 2020.
But here is what Higgs has said very
quick.
Or Oh, maybe I didn't. He just says
it very quick. He says, that the Blackhawk
No. I swear I did download that. I
I must have missed something today. It's crazy.
I keep missing these things.
Pretty sure. Oh, maybe that's what it is.
Because they put a big push to
Nope.
I do see where I went wrong, though.
So either way, he just simply says,
it was a continuity of government training mission.
Training mission.
So interesting around this story first is that,
you know, why why would that be
it just seems like an interesting time.
Now you could argue they do missions like
this all the time, but I I don't
know about that. I think what's interesting is
that right now, either they think they wanted
this to be a conversation,
or it's it's it speaks to something other
they're trying to hide. I I I'm guessing.
I mean, that's all we would be doing
right now. So that's what that my point
in saying all that is that that's what
this started as.
Even before this, this was January 30th. It
was this opaque story that just got crazy,
and that's tip that's the partisan game. Elon
fans it like crazy every time.
A 100%. Yes. Exactly. All sorts of fake
stories that don't add up and we can
now prove aren't true Every time. When there
was the drones, they all ramped up and
lied about or supposedly some mass event that
was gonna happen, but on inauguration.
Again, it wasn't like maybe I'll talk about
it. It was like this is happening. Here
they go. Here's the proof. Here's the prophecy.
Here's what this guy saw and then nothing.
Same thing here. But here is quickly what
Decentral News points out, citing Whitney Webb about
this. This is the one of the earliest
examples of the constitute government
conversation in congress, and it got pushed back
on as we can't discuss that. It's super
top secret. Just worth hearing.
North, in your work at the,
NSC,
were you not assigned at one time to
work on plans for the continuity of government
in the event of a major disaster?
Mister chairman.
I believe that question touches upon a highly
sensitive and classified
area.
So may I request that
you not touch upon that, sir?
I was particularly concerned, mister chairman,
because
I read in Miami papers and several others
that there had been a plan,
developed
by that same agency,
a contingency
plan in the event of emergency that would
suspend the American Constitution. And I was deeply
concerned about it. And
Suspend the American Constitution.
Wondering if that was the area in in
which he had worked.
I believe that it was. I wanted to
get it I most respectfully request that that
matter not be touched upon at this stage.
If we wish to get into this, uncertain
arrangements can be made for an executive session.
Right. So in case you missed it, it's
it's the reality of your government having a
plan to suspend what they have no right
to suspend, which is not something that they
can suspend. But this is where it goes.
And so now you run the risk of
you asked the question, is this something that
they can initiate in order to take to
carry out an agenda? And now we see
them carrying out exercises
at the most alarming time in our history,
in my opinion, where we can see foreign
influence
rolling out his agenda literally in front of
us like it's worth considering that we're in
a very dangerous inflection point here.
But here's what Mario Mario Nafal says. Blackhawk
crash linked to secret US government escape plan,
question mark.
The Blackhawk that collided with passenger DC jet
was reportedly on training mission for a continent
of government. Now, again, the point being this
was on the 1st February even though it
was,
you know, what was said earlier. Like, I
my point here is that this is what
comes out later after the hype around what
turns out not to be the case was
fluttering around for a few days.
But Reuters said. Right? Because, you know, it's
typical that the rebels are always quoting corporate
media.
But John Rich on the 31st just said,
why don't we have the name of the
Blackhawk helicopter pilot?
It's 10,000,000 views.
Well, I mean, who knows? Like, even at
the time, like, I didn't get much into
this because I already I sensed immediately this
story was already becoming a partisan hype story.
Not to say it should there's plenty of
things to talk about. But overall,
that it becomes this game that's like, what?
You know,
unknowns are not immediately
suspect.
Or I guess you always suspect. My point
is that you don't know, as I've said
many times, what you go on with the
story, new things could develop that go, oh,
okay. Now it all comes to that's why
that makes sense. But at the time, it's
very easy to hype the unknown and then
insinuate this or that. And so I simply
said, it's truly wild how easy it appears
to hijack this conversation,
hijack the conversation with a new partisan hype
story. And no, I'm not saying the story
should be ignored. The best manipulations
always include truth.
But if you can't see how transparently
this is being used, I think that's a
choice.
And then, funny enough, on 31st,
concerned citizen. One one of the many accounts
that we're kind of hyping and leaning into
the other stories is, oh, wait. Interesting morning.
This is there was a woman
that became the focal point or I guess
a man, a focal point of the DEI
discussion. So, immediately, it was that there was
the diversity hires, and that's what we know
because Trump
fanned that conversation.
I'll show
you. But the point is that it's not
there's and as even this ends, there's no
proof or evidence even that this is it's
simply that a possibility. Yes. Obviously. If you're
hiring somebody that is not the best person
for the job and that is one of
the people that ended up being the pilot,
which doesn't seem to be the case,
then, yes, you could argue that might have
let been a factor. But the fact that
you can just go, I know because common
sense, the diversity hires or why this all
happened, it is the most lazy cobbled together.
It shows me that that's the thing. It's
DEI. Everything's DEI. That's why because there's I
think it's I think they know that everyone
sees what's happening.
And so, they roll out these ridiculous stories.
And and the point is, they made it
about a trans pilot, and that's why it
all happened. And then, oh, guess what? Turns
out that wasn't her.
Joe Ellis goes online to show the world
that it wasn't her flying the hot Blackhawk.
So then,
which by the way, is now it's got
3.7, but the others are getting 20,000,000 views.
It gets less engagement because, oh, the thing
we were all hyping turns out to not
be the case. And I simply said, maybe
it's a good time to stop promoting the
lying partisan grifters who incessantly push the current
thing?
Facts be damned.
Be they snowflakes or broflakes.
Because what's funny is the whole, I support
the current thing is like that's the Republicans
saying Democrats do that. Well, guess what, guys?
You're the same thing. You're the same woke
right for the woke left. You're the same
thing, the snowflakes and broflakes. You are falling
you are showing yourselves to be willing
to use hate speech to censor and get,
you know, and attack people
and or get people fired from their jobs
because they say they're wrong. It's the same
thing.
In this case,
supporting the current thing. You all get hyped
up into the new direction, and you're all
put the same thing, and you make the
same conversation. But and that's not the majority
of my opinion. That is the team sport
politics,
but it's prominent.
Another example. I mean, I think we pointed
to the same person in the last well,
another example recently. Right? Where it was a
story that that was put out
that turned out not to be the case,
but she was already defending it, even though
it wasn't the reality. So same thing. She
says, retraction. I just received a phone call
from attorney Carl advising me that my previous
post, which I deleted, was inaccurate. The pilot
of the Blackhawk was not a transgender pilot.
However, there is a real transgender pilot, but
not the one that collided with the American
oh, yeah. So it's false is the point.
Got it. And this person says, so you
don't feel any particular need to verify something
before you post it?
That's the only point that matters here
because it wasn't true. So all you had
was the narrative floating around, and you went
with it.
And now it's not true. So if but
I will give her credit for publicly retracting
it. That's more than most of them do.
But this person says, you're depend depending on
people who actually know what's going on to
call you on the phone. That's when you
realize you're probably putting out a claim that
you will later have to retract. It says,
Anne, I I like what you do, but
but you do this too often. You need
to kill that the urge to be the
first. Right? That's what drives this.
So it very well could be good intention.
But overall,
the person
calling and claiming, even with him calling and
saying it, that still does not prove the
story would be this source claims that's the
outcome. But the point is,
she says, Brian, thanks for the writing, but
what else recently have I had to retract?
Well, I just showed you one just, like,
3 days ago. But it says, I did
get a call from someone who knows on
the hell was on the helicopter. I made
a mistake and immediately retracted it. It's it's
it's called being honest. Please clarify your statements.
Well, I mean, I yes. This is now.
But the point is the same as that
when you didn't have information, you ran with
the story that was popular,
which is why it had to be retracted.
But this person says, I'm actually wondering who
planted this story as it it was all
over social media. That's the question we should
be asking.
Seemingly instantaneously.
Yes.
Because it's we're being played.
It says now debunked pilot will be on
CNN. These slabs are making me want to
give up social media altogether. But I hope
we really stand back and think about the
fact it's not some democrat, republican. This is
the government using these stories and clearly playing
the right,
and it's not it's not democrats playing the
right. It's clear I would argue. I think
it's possible. It's clearly, in my opinion,
the self fill they're using this direction to
keep you guys, which is the largest threat
to what's happening from recognizing it's happening.
Holly says,
I didn't see this. I feel you. It
looks like it was
of course, it was.
God, that's perfect for what we're about to
talk about.
Now, I shouldn't I this is just what
Paulie posted. I haven't confirmed this, but it
says, I feel you, Jules. It looks like
it was Matt Wallace, who you've heard me
talk about, who first posted it. You see?
And he's got millions of followers, and he's
lying about damn near everything he posts, and
Elon Musk and the rest promote it. This
is a psychological operation dynamic, guys. And I'm
whether this Matt idiot even knows it. He's
be it's well, I'll hold that. This is
a this is an important point.
Another small unknown account is being blamed, but
it looks like it was him first.
Destiny Resendez says, I don't know if this
is real. This is about my post about
the you know, it it is. It turned
out to be that was her posting, like,
that wasn't me. But what this she said
I don't know if it's real, it says
or what, but this is a new kink
of the story if she wasn't piloting the
pot helicopter.
This person says the reverberation of agenda based
rumors
has become painful to watch. AI not gonna
fix stupid.
At least, there's a lot of average people
that are very, at least honest enough to
call this out.
By the way, Destiny does good work, so
you should definitely follow her.
But here is what Trump said.
Charlie Kirk, of course, sharing it.
Porter says, I'm trying to figure out how
you can come to conclusion
right now,
on 30th, by the way, that diversity had
something to do with the crash.
You can't is the point. You can have
an opinion that it did, but you don't
know even if everything they're saying is true,
you still don't know for a fact. And
by the way, the evidence today,
at least, clearly points the direction that it
had nothing to do with this. Especially, since
at this point, they were pretending and of
the mind that it was the transgender pilot.
But he says, because I have common sense.
Okay? And unfortunately, a lot of people don't.
How silly is that?
Today,
blame the diversity elements, but then told us
that you weren't sure that the controllers made
any mistake. You then said perhaps the helicopter
pilots
were the ones who, made the mistake. It's
all under investigation. I I I understand that.
That's why I'm trying to figure out how
you can come to the conclusion right now
that diversity
had something to do with this crap. Because
I have common sense.
Okay? And see all of his partisan followers
cheer.
Yeah. Stick it to the Democrat.
No. You're dumb. You're stupid. What you just
cheered for is stupid. You have no clue
whether or not that's the case. It's his
opinion.
Right? I mean, I I I I could
also argue that he has some information that
he's not sharing it maybe. But we now
know it's not the case, guys. So what
he said was wrong
and ultimately was being pushed because of the
narrative circulating. So maybe he got tricked by
the narrative. That's what seems to happen or
maybe he's the one pushing it.
But see, calm sense because that's not
it's just a smug dismissal. That's not what
we anybody should cheer for. That didn't answer
the question. In fact, it showed you he
doesn't know, and he just wants to be
smug about it. It's stupid. And, unfortunately,
a lot of people don't. You're damn right
about that. We want brilliant people doing this.
This is a major chess game at the
highest level. All the cute people freak out
about that. And you have
60 planes coming in during a short period
of time, and they're all coming in different
directions.
And you're dealing with very high level computer,
computer work and very complex computers.
And one of the other things I will
tell you is Right. He he jumped away
from that because there's no good way to
end that. The bottom line is if you're
a diversity hire, then you got you must
be dumb and not able to do this,
Which I'm gonna be the 1st to tell
you that if you're not hiring the best
person for the job,
well, then it's a guarantee that that person
is gonna be less than the person that
is best. It's it's totally possible that the
best person could also be the diversity, but
then that then you wouldn't need the diversity
conversation. You would just hire the person best
for the job. So my point is it
usually ends up being somebody that is, you
know, qualified,
but less than the person who's actually the
best because but they're they're a different color
or they're gay or whatever. That's just dumb.
It just it is in fact, in in
his own self, bigotry
because you're
making it about race or,
gender. I mean, that that is bigotry. Just
because it only applies to one thing, you
know, it's just it's the same game. But
overall, the point would be that
unless you're talking about well, they make the
point about the extreme
handicap. There's a good point to make, why
you would even hire somebody in those positions
that may have an extreme handicap. That's the
same reason working in restaurants, I argued you
wouldn't wanna hire somebody that would be a
problem for in a kitchen, for example. That's
not racist. It's just functional. Someone in a
wheelchair is not gonna be able to work
in a hot kitchen line. Right? Even though
I I ran to that when I was
hiring for past restaurants where you had to
walk carefully around that because but it's just
the obvious point. You can be mad at
me about that if you want. It's a
liability. People can get hurt. So that's why
this would make sense. But my point is
if him saying that that is, like, the
absolute,
that you're just not gonna be smart to
do it, well, that is insulting. Because there's
plenty of people out there that have limitations
that might actually still be the best for
the job because they work twice as hard.
But that's not just because they have the
livability. You have to prove that you're actually
best for the job.
But you just it's just frustrating because you
get people that otherwise have good intentions that
get pulled into this. And they think they're
they're cheering because we're fighting the woke, PEI,
but all you're really doing is get tricked
by other very, very bad people.
And you somewhere in there, you know, are
you I mean, there's good people that get
played by this. I'll leave it at that.
What did this guy say?
God, people are so ridiculous.
Well, okay. So here's where it somewhat ends.
Whereas Charlie Kirk goes, we don't know exactly
what caused the crash. Oh, I'm glad you're
admitting that, you know, after lying about it
for 2 years. It says, that's what investigators
are for. But
Trump as absolutely correct that for years across
both Biden, Obama, democrats put lies by choosing
versus oh, okay. So now because of a
broad overlapping point,
we're gonna make it okay that he blatantly
said that's involved even though you just said
we don't know for sure. I mean, that's
that's you're a hypocrite.
You're dishonest. What you're doing is trying to
equivocate the you're trying to make it sound
like he didn't just blatantly lie to you
or push up an opinion as a fact.
We don't know. Read the first line and
realize what they're doing. We don't know. That's
the point.
And then he goes on to show you
the hiring of, you know, and again, through
booty gag and all this stuff. Like, my
point is I think stuff like this is
ludicrous
and is there so it could be brought
down so you think you just won.
That's just my opinion.
But, you know, the point is it's showing
where was it? The
increased employment of severe intellectual disability.
But then highlights what these things are
and showing these different lists. But my I
guess my point would be if are you
are we of the mind that you're gonna
have somebody who can be hired for a
position where they can't even functionally do the
job?
Certainly possible. And if we actually see that,
well, that makes my point. Nobody would nobody
logical is gonna say it makes sense, so
it's there in order to be made to
be brought down. But overall, it is my
as far as I could tell, not the
overarching broad stroke thing they're making it out
to be. Especially, again, in case you're missing
the point so far, they were all wrong.
And now we're at a point where that's
not the case. But I wanna highlight this
before we get to that.
Here's Alex Jones. Evidence indicates that backdoor remote
control technology was used to ensure the trash
helicopter oh, no. That's fake.
Sorry, bud. There and it is not just
because they said this. It's because the story
has now come to a point to where
all of them are acknowledging. It says there
is no evidence to support either claim of
remote control or a sleeper agent. But Alex
Jones sure shared that and got 18,000,000 views
on it and probably made the 100 mil
$100,000 from his donations that day.
Not that even that matters. The point for
me, he's wrong
and seems to
and
the point is about the fact that it's
misinformation.
And people are I I I'm convinced these
people are not just
profiteering.
It's about very specific misinformation
at very specific times where you where everyone
seems to be able to see it and
they still don't care. Feels very similar to
the other conversation, doesn't it? Why would you
do that knowing that everyone is seeing through
you? I mean, you're getting fact checks on
Twitter for crying out loud. Ask yourself that
question.
But here's where that's where I I was
gonna hold back on. So this, guys,
is Jack Wallace,
not Matt Wallace.
Jack Wallace, apparently, which I just found today,
is Matt's brother.
Weird how we keep seeing this. You got
the Tate brothers. You got the Weinstein brothers.
But he goes, breaking new footage of DC
plane helicopter. It's not new footage, by the
way. This is taken from another account, saying,
Blackhawk was blacked out.
Okay. Well, there are stories about this, but
then he goes, well, what? The transponder
was blacked out on the helicopter force. This
guy has no idea what he's talking about,
just like Matt Wallace, but grasps on to
whatever is running around and tries to make
it as something different to get the reach.
This guy has 25,000
followers.
K? This video
got 11,000,000 views. Just went up by a
100,000.
Does that sound like it makes sense?
Alright. You have us over here with 80,000
followers, and we get 6 reshares and think
with this. There's a lot of people like
that right now. This guy shared a video
that was already out there with bear with
25,000 followers and got 11,000,000 followers in reach
and doesn't even know what he's talking about
because the story
was about,
basically, the the as he pointed out, the
constitute of government exercise and that they were
flying with night vision
for testing out that, you know, the night
vision exercise.
So he shares this because he's regurgitating
what somebody else wrote and then people asking
questions, he go he tries to clarify. The
transponder was blacked out on the helicopter for
civilian. He's conflating different parts of the story.
The guy doesn't even know what he's talking
about.
According to reports, the Blackhawk helicopter is flying
higher than it was approved to flight path.
That's what Trump has even ultimately ended up
on. They were flying too high,
and that's why it happened.
But it doesn't have to be some diversity
higher. Who knows why that happened? And I
guarantee other people involved, even people at the
let's put it this way. It's a continuity
of government exercise
that you're in night vision blacked out. Are
we gonna pretend like following the rules is
part of that exercise?
Either way.
Flying higher than approved flight path, possibly outside
the designated airspace, which could have contributed to
the con the collision.
The deviation from the approved flight path may
have led to a situation where the helicopter
was, quote, blacked out, meaning it was in
a court condition where its night vision goggles
would not have been an effective due to
okay. That's how this is highlighting it for
other reports. From what I can tell, that
was actually part of the exercise.
This is just another part of the video
where you can see them colliding, which is
just crazy.
And by the way, you can see as
they go to collide that both of them
have lights on.
But it says new footage has been released
showing Wednesday's, mid air collision between both these,
you know, the passenger flight and the helicopter.
67 deaths,
just in case you wanna see the actual
thing on there. And so here here's his
account.
Here's his brother, Matt Wallace, who has been
blocked by the way because I was every
time he was putting stuff out, I was
very easily showing that he was making things
up and lying, and so he blocked me.
Simple.
But Matt Wallace
has 2,300,000 followers.
1 of the easiest people to show is
lying. I mean, I'm talking like kindergarten level
stuff where the guy is speaking like he
has a 1st grade education. He's not proving
anything. He's showing you basically subjective overlapping points
and then goes behind the paywall. Here's all
the facts, then you go behind nope. Same
thing.
Just the same old extension of a non
story with no verifying facts, usually hyperbole
and subjective assumption.
I'm not look for yourself. If you're not
a moron, it's very clear. But it's the
same thing with, like, the people's voice.
And the rest of these platforms, they get
propped up by the Elon ecosphere
because there's a game being played here. But
I just find it really interesting that all
of a sudden,
December 2024, Jack Wallace hits the scene, and
it says, technology investor, crypto enthusiast, politics, Doge,
and Trump coin.
Follow my brother, Matt Wallace.
Gosh. Darn it, man. I'm just telling it's
it's just crazy out there.
And interesting that he comes around as at
least Paulie's claiming his brother starts the whole
fake lie. This guy jumps into it, gets
a 1000000 views,
and probably made a lot of money.
And he's also very wrong, by the way.
But here's what's interesting on that note.
Thacker points out the Pentagon's pro provides office
space for a limited number of media. To
broaden access to reporters who did not have
this luxury, these outlets will be now removed.
New York Times, NBC,
NPR, Politico,
which I think are all propaganda platforms. So
it it had things they've reported that are
still end up being true or in some
cases, things that I think are even good
work. But I very much think all of
them on the overarching long term agenda is
about misinforming you. Then it goes, here are
the ones that will be offered space.
New York Post,
One America News, Breitbart, Huffington Post.
So, are we confused or is this all
just the same thing?
Right? We're at a different moment. We're now
we're being propagandized in a different direction. New
York Post, One America News, these are Republican,
very Zionist lying platforms. Like, look at the
New York Post lies just since October 7th.
I mean, like, egregious, easily provable lies or
blatantly reporting whatever Israel said even though the
rest of the world's already acknowledged that it
was already proven to be a lie.
Not a joke. One America News, Breitbart, it's
all it's nothing to post is a different
political direction, but the same outcome.
If you can see beyond the 2 party
illusion, which I'm beginning to think is most
people, then you already know what we're talking
about.
But
it's just a rotation, guys. That's all it
is. As Garland put it, it's a corporate
restructuring.
They're still lying to you.
Now this is obvious in how clear this
is just push, push, push.
Charlie Kirk says the media doesn't know what
it's getting into picking a fight with Trump
over DEI and air travel.
Right? So let's be clear on this. This
whole thing was built up around the idea
that that person was oh, I think I
have this in the wrong spot. I just
realized that.
Shoot. Let me show you this first. This
was the culmination point of the other one.
So here we are with this,
and this guy who I'm not familiar
with says, cis straight white pilot, cis straight
white helicopter pilot, cis straight white air traffic
controller, cis straight white FFA administrator, fired by
cis straight white president, and cis straight white
billionaire.
That's the reality, by the way. So it
wasn't the transpilot. Okay.
Here's what he said.
Because they put a big push to put,
diversity
into the FAA's program.
Then another
article, the Federal Aviation Administration. This was before
I
got to office
recently, second term.
The FAA is actively recruiting workers who suffer
severe
intellectual disabilities,
psychiatric problems, and other mental and physical conditions
under a diversity and inclusion hiring initiative spelled
out
on the agency's website. Can you Yeah. I
mean, again, same point,
meritocracy. That's it. There's no place in any
context where I argue anybody but the best
for the jobs to be hired, especially in
a technical challenging job. But do we know
that that's for people that are aircraft controllers
or the people that are administrators
at the FFA
or working as a janitor or whatever. I
mean, I'm just saying, let's be real. There's
a lot more than just what he's pointing
to in that, which is what the reality
is when you break it down. But I'm
not gonna say they wouldn't put people in
positions to make any number of reasons even
if it's to bay build this up so
it can be brought down. Or maybe they're
just crazy. I'm not gonna die any of
that. But what I do know is that
this is a broad stroke argument
that's being used only on the on the
heels of a story that they were wrong
about because it's about this agenda. It's about
getting you overcompensated
and over focused on just DEI. That's my
opinion. But damn it if that's not clear
right now.
These are people
that are,
I mean, actually, their lives are shortened because
of the stress
that they have. You know what's really stupid
about this? Look at the list of things
he's listing off. There's not equivalent between all
of them. There's very different challenges for each
one, but he's gonna tell you that they're
just challenged, shortened life. Yeah. Some of them,
like dwarfism, for example. Yeah. They do have
not every single person on that list is
gonna, you know but the idea is that
he's just trying to broad stroke this so
it makes it about that's why this happened
and restoring faith in air travel. You know,
there was the other crash in Philadelphia, I
believe.
It's it's really silly to me to actually
try to make this about DEI.
I I I I just it certainly is
an overlapping factor.
One, there's no way they could absolutely know
that the choice and decision that was made,
even if they were a diversity hire, was
why the crash happened.
Unless we can prove that, which they don't
they're not claiming.
Like, in the sense, like, let's, for example,
say that their disability happened to be the
problem that's caused them not to react in
time, and you could then prove that. Yeah.
Well, I have everyone to point that out,
but that's not what we're seeing here.
Brilliant people
have to be in those positions, and their
lives are actually shortened, very substantially shortened because
of the stress where you have many, many
planes coming into one target.
I just I just kind of, like, blurred
those 2 things. It didn't make sense. But,
of course, the point is you get people
that then rip apart for this because that
is a dumb thing to say in a
large sense. But then you get the people
that are, I guess, their job because they
feel they support him or he they know
him and their best friends, even they don't,
is to defend that.
Even though in other if it was Biden
said it, they would probably find ways to
rip it apart. It's just partisanship is so
tiresome today. And it's so
I mean, a 1,000 different adjectives. It's it's
just it's getting obnoxious more so than ever.
But this person says, just because someone is
straight and white, doesn't mean they're qualified.
That's the part the left doesn't get. Aptitude
has nothing to do with with race.
Funny how you miss the point though. The
point is that you guys are trying to
make this about a diversity hire, and he's
simply highlighting it's a bunch of white males.
Like, dude, not saying he's the best person
for the job, but it wouldn't be a
diversity hire if they're a bunch of straight
white males.
Right?
He's but the point is, now they're broadening
it well. They could still be
okay. Well then, I think we've all lost
the plot here, guys. I think it's about
applying DEI where no matter what, because that's
the thing we're supposed to say. Even in
cases where it does matter. But this person
says, sorry. This is a DEI reply. You're
actually unqualified to reply to me. This is
funny.
So Charlie Kirk,
back to the point from before, says the
media doesn't know what it's getting into picking
a fight with him on DEI air travel.
Here's the facts. Obama administration threw out all
the results of the merit based. Yeah. Okay.
We all get it. I agree. They went
in that direction, overcompensated.
Now you're allowed to now you're rolling it
back. And in the mix of all of
that, we're all losing our rights, our liberty,
or freedom. Oh, did you miss that part,
sir? Kirk?
You stop short before technocracy. Sorry.
Overall,
yes. It's obvious to see that there is
abuse in this.
But it I mean, overall,
anybody, as I've said before, should be leaning
in the right direction of meritocracy. But this
is the point I'm getting at, that you
have now you guys have now turned this
into some DEI focused debate over 2 things
that you can't even prove are exactly what
was related to it. So the point is
you had an agenda and that was to
make DEI the focus, and then you took
this and made it into that story using
a false narrative spread by Matt Wallace to
get it spinning and now you're just going
forward anyway. Because, well, we all know there's
DEI. Well, that's not the same point though.
Yes. We do. But you've turned this in
you get the point. You've taken a false
story to roll this out.
How do you not see that as dishonest
even if the story about DEI overall is
true? They're playing you. And then Musk goes
on a rampage about it. DEI has caused
people to die.
Like, he thinks he's being clever. That's not
even that clever. The point is that you're
trying to make the argument that this is
what was responsible for the crashes. Without saying
that, right, that's what this guy does. He's
very manipulative.
Then this person says, DEI kills people literally.
DEI is a structural racism. Believe in the
end. Yeah. Overall agree, but most of these
people that are against this are supporting the
most obvious apartheid state in the world,
committing open racist genocide everywhere you look.
Selective application.
But it's simply saying believing the ends justify
the means. Yeah. Same point. On the other
hand, diversity is a natural byproduct of meritocracy.
Yeah. We see that I agree with. But
it says the key term is that equity
in DEI means do anything to ensure equal
outcomes. That's not meritocracy. It's racist. I agree
with that. But what they're saying right there
is applying this to this whole conversation that
just happened.
To say DEI kills people literally is quite
a stretch. It can, just like any practice,
could lead to that if it leads to
a situation where somebody is unqualified.
And there's a lot of that today that's
happening on both sides of the paradigm.
But it is a stretch to just make
it it kills people.
A lot of things can,
but it's a stretch to say an ideological
thing ultimately will always do that. But you
get my point. There's there's points we may
know of. Absolutely, he says. He goes on.
Paul Joseph Watson says, Trump is right. DEI
is making us less safe.
Look. These aren't things that anybody should disagree
with, but what they're doing is trying to
make this the only focal point. They're now
broadening this out. That's why Tomi Lahren was
making a point about it. Guys, take a
pump take a break here. This is everything
is now DI everywhere you look. Anything that
is not Trump's agenda has now been DI.
It's the same application of anti semitism. Anything,
though, it's the same game.
And this one, Donald Trump Junior says, that's
real. It's amazing. And Elon Musk shared this
with a little emoji.
It's the office of Kamala
Harris.
And it says 404.
This page is unburdened by what has been,
which is funny. It made me laugh.
But this guy says it's real. It's amazing.
The White House is fire.
I just say it just makes me laugh.
If you guys think that's important
I mean, look. Obviously, you could just share
something because it's funny. But what I'm seeing
is this is taking over the conversation.
And here's my point. I said, who cares
about the Zionist technocrat takeover of our country
being facilitated by the current administration as long
as you troll the Democrats?
Right? As long as we can make Democrats
look stupid, yeah, well, listen. We're winning.
Some people actually can't tell the difference.
And where are we? Over 4?
So what was I gonna do last year?
I think I can get into some of
these next show. I'm pretty sure I'm gonna
be able to do a show tomorrow.
This was gonna be about the the doge
spending
overlap,
which I I think we can get into
tomorrow. Because I there's a bunch I wanna
I don't wanna rush through these last parts,
but we will we'll talk about this. This
interesting point, because this kind of happened today.
This conversation about and this was the point
from earlier I was saying. So, this is
what Robbie Sherr saying, highest ranking treasury official,
excuse me,
David Liebrecht,
who by the way was appointed by Donald
Trump
until
best percent percent comes into position, but nonetheless,
appointed by Donald Trump. He resigned rather than
complying with the with Doge,
which was forcing access to the trillions they
spend under the argument that they just and
it says what he says right here. He
then adds on the, at 12:52 in the
morning at February 1st,
the DOGE team discovered, among other things, that
payment approval officers at treasury were instructed
always
to approve payments
even to known fraudulent or terrorist groups.
They literally never denied a payment to the
entire career.
Not even once, he says.
I I mean, I'm not I wouldn't surprise
me. In fact, I'm I'm Nothing these days
surprised me when it comes to criminality of
our governments.
But do we know that?
I mean, it's just Elon saying that on
Twitter, and he's been lying a lot
or been wrong a lot or shared false
statements from other liars a lot.
My point is from
0 hedge to plenty of mainstream articles to
even people that I respect.
Musk reveals treasury's been autopaying everyone. Why? Because
there's the tweet.
Jeez. Twitter files really get a number on
people, guys. Again, my same point is even
if it turns out to be true, the
fact that people argue it is we know
it is because he said it online,
How you know dangerous and irresponsible it is?
We are in a bad position
where people are able to you know, where
where mainstream articles are written around the idea
that this is the case because Elon tweeted
about it.
Even though he shares VISR grad 24, like,
every day, and they are nothing but a
constant misinformer. They lie about things around Israel
every day.
It is interesting.
Or here's what's this other example, by the
way?
Trump shares a screenshot. It's simply so, look
at how much it's reduced after their immigration
point.
I just my point is, like, people are
sharing this as if they know or making
articles about it. And my point is, I
don't even know what the graph is. It's
something they just
I at this point, when they just got
caught lying about military in California or Gaza
condoms, both of these two people, why do
we pretend a screenshot means anything? Half the
time, I don't even think they know they're
wrong, guys.
That's not even to say it's false. I'm
just gonna make it a point about assumptive
people today.
But those wanting access to the treasury payment
system,
and then she's pointing out that this
was somebody Trump appointed.
We'll go into this again. I'm just going
through it quickly to wrap.
Now, these are different perspectives.
Obviously, common dreams is is a left leaning
platform. But interesting point though, that this comes
to an argument about the legalities of it
all. Right? The idea is it does seem
that they've taken control of this now.
Musk and Doge gain access to treasury payment
systems after the guy resigns that Trump appointed.
But here's the problem.
As I think they write right here.
No. It's not that one. Where was that?
Oh, it's right there. Congress famously has the
power of the purse. It says, but it
looks like Doge is trying to snatch it.
We have to realize, this is my point
from before. I am no I I I
want no government.
But if we're at a point where this
is the process and con congress, whether it's
war or spending,
is approving these things. And we're supposed to
pretend there's a check and balance. Right? Now
you've got a and not even a true
government
it's a it's an advisory role that's gonna
disappear soon. And they're supposedly stepping in and
taking control of $6,000,000,000,000
of spending that's already been allotted by congress.
It's technically illegal. And on top of that,
this man is not somebody we should be
trusting right now with all of the influence
in very, very clear compromise positions, whether it
is him or Trump or anybody else in
their current inner circle that are blindly, blindly
supporting of
a dangerous, Zionist, genocide committing, prophetic organization,
or or
Palantir or Larry Ellison or any of the
rest of these people that are intertwined in
what's happening right now. My point though is
that this spending
is a huge deal.
These people haven't signed ethics contracts. Like, how
and the main point was we don't even
know whether whether foreign governments are funding them
or dictating what they then do with Israel.
Okay. If we're worried for in earnest that
Israel is truly influencing this country, which I
think most people are,
how do we not worry about what this
is?
Every one of these little steps where you're
seeing more and more consolidation of control under
the guise of fighting woke politics,
couldn't you at least consider this is Israel?
Or what if it was China?
Isn't that something we hear a lot? Like,
you can't take a step back and go,
woah. Maybe we should make sure he doesn't
break you know,
ignore our constitutional rights in the interest of
going after woke politics,
just in case it's a foreign government. Of
course not.
Maybe Honest might do that.
But don't worry because Alex Jones is telling
you that the steep states coming after the
economy. It's gonna collapse the economy.
BlackRock's hidden hand in the market meltdown. You
mean BlackRock that currently funds Elon Musk or
BlackRock that is the shareholder of rumble or,
you know but no, no. Those are the
good versions of it though. It's only this
where the matters. Or the idea that I
think what he's doing is trying to justify
what is about to happen because of what
they're doing.
The reality of the financial situation that they're
creating.
In this case,
forcing other countries to not move away from
the dollar even though as David Ick points
out, isn't that freedom? Freedom to choose what
currency we want to but not in the
new world of freedom.
Right? When you're talking about sustainability and diversity
and those the game of the world, well,
guess what? Freedom and liberty from these people's
mouths seems to be in the opposite.
Elon Musk now has full access to treasury's
payment system.
Trump's admin missing ethics pledges.
It's amazing.
Absolutely it's terrifying.
Now we'll go over this.
The tariffs point
and some of these really alarming administrative positions,
Tulsi Gabbard
con contradicting her stance on Trump's Iran policy,
literally calling him a warmonger, saying that it's
illegal
warmongering and now saying it was right.
You're either not anti war or you're I
mean, you're a hypocrite. There's no way around
it. You can't pretend that that's a problem
and now pretend it's good because you're on
his side. Tulsi Gabbard is increasingly shown to
be one of these 2 I mean, it's
you're flip flopping in very hypocritical ways. You're
just as bad as Bernie Sanders and all
the rest.
Or this one with
okay. We'll end with this because it's funny.
And I'll go over this more, but here
Pauley made this point. This is Kash Patel.
They're all screaming about what a great thing
he is, but this is what just happened.
It's not just this, but it's just this
is just embarrassing as well as his support
for Pfizer warrants that we're all supposed to
fight against.
Are you familiar with the Stu Peters? Does
that name ring a bell?
I'm sorry. What Are you familiar with mister
Stu Peters?
As if he couldn't hear the question.
Not off the top of my head. He
made 8 separate appearances on his podcast.
That's funny. So much for being here. We
appreciate it. Thanks, dude. Always love coming on
the show. Kash Patel, thank you so much
for making the time to be here with
us. We appreciate it. Thanks, dude. Appreciate it.
Thank you so much for being here. We
appreciate it. Thanks, Stu. Appreciate it. See you
soon. I gotta go, Cash. Thank you so
much for being here. We really appreciate it.
Thanks, Stu. I'll against the heartbreak here. Thank
you so much for being here. We appreciate
it.
Thanks so much, Stu. Appreciate it. You're got
a great show. Thank you.
Yeah. You got got a great show. You're
the best. Now, obviously, you could argue that
he is, you know,
got somebody
handling him and may you know, you could
argue in a weird way or just, you
know, an assistant who's kicking these, doing it
for him, and he was being put on
all sorts of shows, and he's just being
kind. That's certainly possible.
But I think we all get the sense
that I mean, you stat many times, you
don't know. I mean, come on. I mean,
that you could look further and adjust those.
There's clear overlap here. And as people are
pointing out, just like we saw before, they
these peep they're leaning into the extreme and
and moronic people like Steve Stu Peters because
they're reach in order to get that benefit,
but then dropping them when it's inconvenient. Because
that's how this works.
That's what I said. Well, that's embarrassing, both
for working with that hack and trying to
hide from it.
Oh, and I was gonna show that's just
we'll do that. I was gonna show you
this. So here here's Polly's tweet. Right?
Here's my quote tweeting it. Right?
Well, here's all the quotes from her tweet.
Oops.
See? Here's a tweet. Now what you won't
find,
especially not at the top where you're supposed
to see your quotes at the top like
that. Right? But just take a quick little
glance. Here's all the quotes.
What you won't see in this list of
quotes from Twitter
is TLav.
Oops.
It's the small thing, guys, but this is
it matters.
It's it's small, subtle, constant suppression where you
just don't show up
when it matters, when they want that. Or
you can look for yourself. What you'll notice
if you go fast enough, oh, you see
a little quick circle at the end? That
that is an indication that they're suppressing. Watch.
Watch right at the bottom. You'd see the
blue circle start to load and out then
stops.
That's you it's gonna load more and then
stops it. I'm telling you right now, guys.
There's people
this platform is actively suppressing people's content that
they don't agree with. If you don't know
that by now, I just I I think
you don't care.
And then this one, Kash Patel is okay
with wireless
war what warrantless wiretaps,
70 two Pfizer warrants.
And I'll I'll get into this more.
That's what he says. And I said, this
perfectly sums up the way the 2 party
illusion works. It never it's never truly about
solving the issue, guys. It's always about maintaining
it,
but doing it in a way that nods
to the current paradigm partisan support.
And they always pretend to seek an end,
then they always rationalize its continuity.
What he says is, well, what? Well, I'll
we have to look into it because they
do have a value, but to make sure
that they do it right. Oh, okay. So
something that they've already abused,
you're gonna make sure it still goes forward.
Just make sure they don't abuse it.
So the same thing continues, and they'll probably
continue to abuse it because that's what they
use it.
I thought it was gonna end the FBI.
No. No. He's just gonna turn it into
what they need for their purposes, and then
they'll cheer it as somehow ending it because
they'll alter the name or something. Like, it's
just so it's it's so basic right now.
But, of course, Alex Jones says, Bob Shell,
he told the world that Pelosi and Schumer
refused all the National Guard troop.
Well, as Darren says, well, everybody knew that,
man. We reported it. They reported it. It
was public dollars. Yes. That they've I know
the democrats pretended, but it's not some bombshell
when it was publicly reported news. We knew
they turned down the National Guard. That's public.
But I said, but Darren, Elon said, wow.
We're supposed to pretend this is a bombshell.
Because he did. Wow.
Wow. That's crazy.
And, of course, because Josh Hawley tells you
these people are on your side, well, of
course they are. Right? When the deep state
Josh Hawley tells you that you gotta support
these guys, well, then you gotta because we're
fighting the deep state. It's obvious.
I'll leave it there. We'll get into some
Epstein overlap when we go into the next
one.
And then just lastly, this is interesting to
me.
Conor McGregor is now meeting with 20 members
of the Irish parliament to confirm his candidacy
ahead of Ireland's presidential election.
Well, it seems interesting.
Sort of seems like
Andrew Tate and the bro of party
in the in in in in the UK.
Is that interesting? Or even Tommy Robinson going
all political.
In this case, where he's sharing this about
no place for people like this, the 21st
century,
pretending it's Islam, even though it's actually a
Jewish woman in Israel.
It's the truth.
Jewish woman and her 2 daughters in Israel,
dark black cloak dark black clothing. This is
forward Jewish platform.
I simply said, hey, will you call this
out? And will you still call this out
as having no place in 21st century once
you realize it's actually a picture of a
Jewish woman in Israel?
This person says, Ryan, you see what was
positioned under his pro Tommy rally today? Well,
look at that.
Half British, half Zionist.
Isn't that exactly what keeps seeing in Trump's
administration?
Yeah. Don't miss what's happening right now.
It's not hard to see.
My point is you got people like this
rapist or this rapist who are running for
political parties because they see the game.
Apparently, it's working.
Hopefully, we can see through it.
Thank you all for tuning in today.
Had a pretty good turnout today. Long show,
a lot to get to. Make the clips
for me, tag me, get this stuff out.
There's always these little parts in there that
I that are they're important. You know, those
little sections that I think are powerful. They
get buried in a long show. If you
really if you if you help me clip
these things out, tag me in it. Right?
Which mean do it consistently. Well, I'll tag
you. We'll we'll get that reach out. The
point is that, you know,
even right now, some of the people doing
clips for us, Jason, Brock, I mean, it's
we never tied the belt a little bit
because with, you know,
half tens of 1,000 of dollars in Littman
lawyer fees, they're still racking up for all
the lawsuits that are still building up from
Israel attacks on on TLAP. What it is,
what's happening. My point though is that help
us get the clips out because I need
to grow the reach as the suppression only
continues. But thank you for your support, guys.
All the links down below. Down in the
show notes. Donations.
We take cryptocurrency,
direct donations through Stripe,
donations through things that won't censor us, you
know, all sorts of different ways, or our
mailing address for you to send something, even
just words of encouragement.
It means a lot. Thank you all for
being here.
I love you all. As always,
question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.