When were you in Gaza?
End of April for the 1st couple weeks.
And then there's sniper bullets. I had children
that were shot twice. Wait. You're saying that
children in Gaza are being shot by snipers?
Definitively.
I have 2 children that I have photographs
of that were shot so perfectly in their
chest I couldn't put my stethoscope over their
heart more accurately
and directly on the side of the head
in the same child. No toddler gets shot
twice by mistake by the world's best sniper,
and they're dead center shots.
In fact, more than 20 doctors recently in
Gaza also told Sunday morning about gunshot wounds
to children.
One American doctor told us he even reviewed
CT scans to confirm what he saw because
he, quote, didn't believe that this many children
could be admitted to a single hospital
with gunshot wounds to the head.
Some shootings
have been captured on video.
So of all the disaster zones you've seen,
how does Gaza compare?
All of the dis disasters I've seen combined
Combined. 40 mission trips 30 years,
ground 0,
earthquakes.
All of that combined
doesn't equal
the level of carnage
that I saw against civilians
in just my 1st week in Gaza.
And when you say civilians,
is it mostly children?
Almost exclusively children.
I've never seen that before.
Never seen that. I've seen more
incinerated children than I've ever seen in my
entire life combined. I've seen more shredded children
in just the 1st week. Shredded? Shredded. What
do you mean? Missing body parts. Being crushed
by buildings, the greatest majority.
Or bomb explosions,
the next greatest majority. We've taken shrapnel as
big as my thumb
out of 8 year olds.
The UN reports that to date, more than
80% of Gaza's population has been displaced
and the majority of its buildings
destroyed.
A reality which has taken its own toll
on the well-being of children.
Do you think that you witnessed
war crimes taking place?
Probably.
The ground assumption is that they are Hamas.
And then if you go this way, you're
bound to kill people that are not.
Now in a rare interview,
one soldier tells us about the reality
he says he witnessed.
What kind of stuff would they say? There
are no
uninvolved, only unarmed.
This is something that I'm going to carry
for the rest of my life.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Thursday,
January 30th,
excuse me, 2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Probably gonna
be a longer show. Have a lot I
wanna get in today.
I definitely wanna make sure we start with
some of the follow-up points that I I
was kind of trailing into at the end
of yesterday's show,
but the main part of today's show is
gonna be focused on primarily
the the Gaza ceasefire. I I I even
struggle saying that, like with Lebanon, seeing as
how we can
prove easier than anything else in this conversation
that they violated this every single day so
far. Every single day from the moment this
started, just like with Lebanon,
roundly proven in 45 different ways, and it's
still ignored by the western media and the
western press or and the western politicians.
The point is we're gonna get into this
the ongoing ceasefire dynamic,
the
overlapping points of Trump
telling you he's gonna clean it out, continuing
to support the ongoing genocide and arming them,
giving them the m two MKA 2 2,000
pound bombs,
as well as the antisemitism
executive order, which it looks like it was
signed right while I was live last night,
which is what I expected. And it's it's
actually worse than we thought. I'll go into
it more split more in detail today.
All this comes together with the immigration conversation,
with the Israel driven weaponized migration that's happening
in this country, with the weaponization
of
your own ideology.
Right? Whatever you think making you out to
be somehow anti Semitic or whatever it may
be or that you were a red hat.
That wasn't that long ago. Now those are
the ones pointing at anybody else because the
team sport element of this and the left
and the right are being driven by something
other than what's interest the interest of Americans.
But there's a lot of really wild
egregious lies taking place right now. Just blatant
misinformation, which clearly does exist,
primarily from the partisan field, it would seem,
which in my mind is just an extension
of the mainstream media, guys. That's what this
is. So it's important to see these to
start. I'm gonna do kind of a rapid
fire on this. I'm hoping this won't be
as long as it might be,
but I wanna get through some of these
to start so we can spend the bulk
of the conversation in, what's going on in
foreign policy. And that's Syria, Lebanon,
Gaza,
and, you know, a lot of different extended
parts of this story that are
showing you the same thing we've been talking
about for a long time. The the these
are the villains of our time, guys. That's
what we're staring at. It's I mean, the
the clip we started with, I've showed you
that many times. That's a Jewish doctor who
was in Israel, which or in Gaza. And
point is it shouldn't make any difference
more so one or the other. Just because
he's Jewish, it doesn't make his words any
more impactful. But it might reach people who
wanna pretend that if you you would only
say such a thing because you're somehow racist.
The bottom line is, guys, listen to what
they're all telling you. I mean, never before
in his entire career, all combined, has he
seen what he's seeing there, exclusively
I mean, they know what they're watching. They
know what we're seeing. It's it's it's torture.
It's genocide. It's what this is. And everyone
in the world seems to recognize that, and
it still seems to continue. That is the
point we need to make sure we don't
miss. I bring it up every time. That
shows you who these people really are. Now
it's a whole separate conversation on how we
deal with that because it seems to make
no difference what we wanna say and think
and vote for. But just recognize they don't
care what you think. They are not in
some kind of
representative government dynamic if they're willing to just
continue to support the most obvious genocide in
history
using your money while you know they're doing
it, and it just keeps going.
It's pretty disgusting. But I wanna go through
some of these points to show you both
the overlapping lies that we're seeing in that
regard, but also from the people that are
I mean,
I I I don't even know exactly why
I would say I think this is happening
so transparently.
Other than the obvious point that I make,
which is it seems it's in Israel's interest
to basically
burn down this country at this point, and
that's what seems to be happening. Divide and
conquer as as even Vivek
Ramaswami said was the mindset of Elon Musk
and them, but, of course, in a different
context. Right? You as long as you see
it in the lens of bad guy democrats
or woke ideology, all of which matter in
certain conversations. But as long as you only
see through that lens, you're missing 99% of
the story. Those are the things that like
Antifa and Patriot Fraud and these different groups.
These are things that they're being used to
keep us in certain places.
I'm hoping more and more people day by
day are beginning to recognize that. I think
they are.
Now I'd like to start before we get
into some of these different
quick, hopefully, quick points about just basic misinformation
coming from currently the leading admit
the current administration that's in power. You can
pretend that's left to right. For me, it's
just our government, but that's the point of
you know, that's where this is coming from
right now. I'll go through a lot of
these, but I wanted to make sure we
shouted out the ongoing event. Today was when
I was supposed to fly out to Mexico.
For those who don't know, I had a
death in the family. I went into it
yesterday, and it's it's it's been a really
it's been a struggle. It's been very difficult
for my family, and it's my grandmother was
the moral foundation of this family and truly
helped raise me. And so it's, you know,
it's it's something that is gonna be
that will impact me for the rest of
my life. But I went into that yesterday
and talked about why it was important to
me, and and you you know, guys
let me share something on there. But the
point is that that was a very difficult
choice for me because, one, I wanted to
make sure I wanted to go to this
event for me. I was really looking forward
to being a part of this and the
amazing people that are there, but also just
because it's something that I committed to. And
I made the difficult choice to be here
for my family at a time when clearly
and now I mean, especially now, just I'm
it's very clear this was the right choice
for me. I I don't even know how
this would be going forward without me here
at this moment. But, nonetheless, make sure you're
supporting his event. Make sure you're supporting what's
going on. Make sure you're taking part in
it. Some of the most amazing people in
this field are here at this event. And
just really true, genuine, honest, nonpartisan,
caring people that are interested in you know?
You know, it's such a fresh breath of
fresh air to be in a circum in
a in a grouping of people that aren't
driven by partisan
division politics. It's it's incredible how suffocating that
is in the world today. So please make
sure you check it out. I was just
watching Derek speak about you know, it's it's
a very powerful event. I'll leave this here
all the
I believe I currently still have a link
down below.
Show the support. They they deserve it because
it's a a really great event.
And I will be shouting this out over
the next few days as it continues. I
believe there's still about 5 days left. Please
take part.
Now I wanna start with something Carrie said.
Just kinda as a as a overarching kind
of tone
for, like, everything we ever always do forever,
but really today, in in a in a
especially, but my point, you know, kinda joking
is this is just always how we're
seeing this. And it shouldn't be taken as
something that is like a like, a derisive
thing, like, where it's like you're lesser than
or you don't see it. The point is
to just at least consider
from a different perspective. Like, I often stand
back and go, am I wrong? Like, is
it that Trump is the best you know,
gonna save us, or is it that Republicans
are somehow better than Democrats, or somehow the
Democrats are better than Republicans and one side's
gonna bring us home? And, you know, I
mean, obviously, you know I don't think that.
But I actively think stand back and consider
that or any number of other things that
I could be wrong on, like during COVID
19.
You know how many times I had the
because there's you know, you come across information
and you go, well, okay. That's somewhat compelling.
Right? But you later find out it was
because they completely lied about statistics, you know,
whatever. But the point is
that you
I knew there was a problem with
there it goes. Something's going really fishy with
the StreamYard today. My window's acting funny. I
wanted to bring myself back up. But during
COVID 19,
I I went as you're going through it,
you know, you're seeing these things and you're
going, man, this is just like right now,
by the way, way more obvious now, which
is crazy. But we saw the building of
the COVID 19 agenda and the the things
we kept calling out, like the DNA stuff
and all. Remember beginning, we were going, like,
down the list of all the different conspiracy
theories that this was basically completing?
Here we are again, by the way. But
I constantly check myself going, like, okay.
You know, is this am I wrong about
this? Right? Or even in the mass conversation.
But before when I first started, I wasn't
really immersed in that conversation. And in fact,
I only knew pretty surface level information about
it. And I decided to go, okay. I'm
gonna look into this.
It does seem very politicized.
I just barely scratched the surface, and I'm
like, well, this is what they're telling us.
And then the more you dive into it,
now what do you know? Even Fauci's admitted
it. Yeah. Little old Ryan Christian was telling
you that in 2020 along with all the
rest of the people that had a brain
because it was blatantly obvious, and we weren't
just going, but the CDC says. It's amazing.
Right? And that's and I wasn't knowledgeable about
it until we decided to look into it.
The point is though I kept checking myself.
As you go through it, you're like, well,
it maybe I'm hurt. Is it possible that
I'm missing something and the mask needs is
helping some people? You know, that's what we
have to do all the time. Constantly challenge
your ideas, constantly check yourself because, otherwise, you
fall into these traps. They then abuse that.
They know it's human nature to fall in
and and make your groups
and then
tend to be a little bit more difficult
to pull out of those groups. And this
is how they abuse that, leading the resistance
from the top. You know, from the, you
know, kind of paraphrasing the Lennon idea, not,
Beatles Lennon, but, you know, historical concept around
the idea of leading the opposition from from
within. This is a classic tactic. So that
being said, this is something that she said
that I think is just important to think
about.
Let's consider our perspective is my point as
we often would do for anybody else's. Everyone
cheering for a new masters to save them
from the old masters
while a handful of us are waiting for
the masters to realize that the root of
the problem is the indoctrinated belief
that we need masters at all. And she
goes to everyone who likes this post, I
appreciate you. It's been a wild ride in
just over a week with the new regime.
And as hopeful as I am for humanity
and few and and freedom in the long
term, it's gonna be a rough ride for
the foreseeable future. I'm glad you're
here. Just the idea that why do we
think we have to have this dynamic? Now
this doesn't even have to get into, like,
government versus no government, which is, you know,
really the core point.
But why we think we need to have
some dictated ruler that decides whether a king
or a president or a prime minister?
At least just take a second to think
about. Is it possible
to be in a place where we don't
need that? Don't demand that. Don't fight over
which one we have to have.
It's just interesting, isn't it? You'd like I'd
like to believe we're at a point in
the world, in our society, in this country
where that might be the conversation we should
be having right now.
Crazy, I know. But to start off with
a couple of things I really wanted you
not to miss.
Now this one's a little bit out of
place with what we're gonna get into next,
but I just had to make sure you
didn't miss this because it was buried in
a 5 hour show, like, way at the
end.
I I just this is so
wildly dishonest, and it actually that's why it
connects. The next 4 or 5 things we're
gonna go through are just ridiculous.
The gaseous condoms story, which I can still
tell you right now, people are swearing that
it's absolutely still it's false, guys. It is
not true. I will prove it to you
in a second. I wish I would've done
it yesterday because it was more impactful seeing
as how now it's still being pushed. E.
Trump just publicly stated Gaza condoms and bombs
and whatnot. He's just lazy.
I'm I'm of the mind he either very
much knows that's not true or just doesn't
even care because he knows the supporters will
support it whether or not it's true. That's
how this game works. But or the drone
point or the California military point or the
I mean, just one after another. It's pretty
crazy. But this one is from Israel's side
of it. I just want you to think
about why we're seeing such consistently
lazy
dishonesty.
When I mean lazy, it's not like it's
it's easy to see.
They bank on your willingness to go, what
a you know, I'm on their side, so
I don't care. Or I'm not gonna say
anything because they'll call me a racist, or
whatever it is.
Instead of just giving it, like, a half
inch more effort to maybe not make it
so obvious, but that's not their style, apparently.
So this was what we saw, and we'll
get into this in in the latter half.
You know, hopefully not latter half, but after
the first part here.
In regard to the releasing of the Israeli
detainees. Because they're all IDF members. That's pretty
clear. So they're not hostages as much as
they all wanna screech about that. The bottom
line is they were very happy. Oh, thumbs
up. Heart symbol.
Right? That's why I used that image today,
on stage with their hands up. Yay. Cheering.
You know? And I'm not saying that. Doesn't
maybe they were scared the entire time. Maybe
it was terrifying.
But it's pretty clear they were not tortured.
They were not raped. They were not abused.
And they were having that it was like
a sporting event. Like they were winning something.
Whereas the other half of the picture, as
you can see, is one of the people
that was recently released from prison in Israel
without charge for decade plus.
That's what's going on there, and that's the
difference. An emaciated, traumatized,
can barely remember his name, Palestinian,
versus 3 women that they couldn't stop telling
you were raped and tortured and mutilated and
come out cheering and high fiving, giving you
heart symbols. It's almost impossible at the laugh
that I've done this is if it wasn't
such a serious conversation.
So Avi O'Klompas, doing what they do every
single time, comes out and says, a representative
from Israel's health ministry says the 4 newly
released hostages.
It's just they're not hostages. I don't care
how many times you wanna say that. They're
IDF members who were taken from posts. These
are the women that were in we went
over this. But it says,
are in an emotionally and medically complex situation.
Now just the simple statement in itself when
you can literally see them laughing and how
many different ways we'll get into in a
bit in the show, they're trying like they
did last time. They drugged them. No. No.
They didn't. There's no evidence of that. Or
they
they they dressed them up and they make
them, you know, whatever. The the craziest things.
Here's how they make them look like they
weren't starved even though they were. It's like,
guys, that girl is literally overweight. Okay? It's
not possible to tell. Anyway,
the point is they're going out of their
way because they're desperate. They just they went
on a year rant telling you these women
were gonna be beaten up, tortured, pregnant, and
all all and they walk out high fiving
each other. So what do they do? They
make up all sorts of stories. They force
them to wear a necklace. It's crazy. But
here's the point that I thought was bigger
than just some broad, emotionally complex
narrative that makes it sound like we know
some secret thing we're not showing you is
that this was an old quote.
So there's only 1 of 2 things that
happened here. See, this is the article from
January 2025.
Emotionally medic emotional and medically complex situations, says
the health ministry. Okay.
There so either actually, I'll read you directly
from the quote.
It says
and, right here, this is the full quote.
Okay?
It says, this is an emotionally and medically
complex event for the hostages, for their families,
for the families of all the hostages, and
for the entire people of Israel, Mizrahi says.
K? And right here, it said that's who
they're talking to. It says today we met
with the the women you're seeing up there
after 477 days. Okay. So that is clearly
about these women. Now this quote is either
a verbatim,
exactly word for word quote that he gave
the last time, which wouldn't make much sense.
They're gonna try to make that make sense
because they're all tortured the same way, but
they're not tortured, and they're not snorkeling. And
they all seem to be saying the same
thing, save for a few caveats, well after
they've been propagandized and forced into saying something
different by the Israeli government. My opinion, but
I think we all know what's going on.
Or
they just basically took an old quote and
pretended that's what just happened. So let me
show you. This is a Jerusalem Post article
from November 2023.
K? So we had the last example where
some of these people were released. And it
says health of hostages released is good.
Okay? So that that's the headline from the
Jerusalem Post. But then they have to push
this later down in the article. A complex
event, both medically and emotionally.
Here's the quote from November 2023.
Quote, this is a complex event, both medically
and emotionally, for the hostages who have returned
for to Israel, for their families, and for
the entire people of Israel.
Oh, interesting.
Apparently an entirely different person.
Guys, this is how Israel operates.
Either these people are given a script by
the government and just verbatim said the exact
same thing, 2 different people from the health
ministry, or Israel's just blatantly lying to you
about what's going on. What do you think
is going on? I mean, even if they
are actually being told to say that, that's
still a lie.
I think that's profoundly important.
So we're being told these people are suffering.
Iriva Klompas is just vomiting out whatever she's
told because Crimes of Israel said that because
they're being fed information from the government, and
they're literally quoting the exact same thing that
was said back in 2023
about the women that people that later went
on to be have no problems, have no
issues other than it was scary that we
were taken, which I would never argue otherwise.
They were taken. That's horrifying, guys. That was
a probably a scary situation.
But they all seem to continue to argue
they were treated well, like the literal headline
says right there. I find that to be
important. We'll come back to all of that.
So keeping in mind the fact that Israel
is willing to so desperately lie about the
very people that they claim they wanna support.
Right? Think about all these other lies we're
gonna go through.
I just find that to be hilarious and
disgusting that they're willing to make up lies
about women. They want you to pretend that
they were raped somehow. That's what they're doing,
even though they know it didn't happen. Even
with the chief example, the woman in the
ground the the gray pants with the blood.
K? That has now been proven without a
shadow of a doubt to not have been
raped. She is now one of the ones
that was released. She wasn't raped. They've now
proven that they even had the video of
that from the very beginning, that they knew
she wasn't, and they all still lied about
it.
This is a profoundly,
profoundly sick grouping of people. Okay? And it
is not every Israeli and not every Jewish
person, but it is without question the Zionist
entities that are driving this. They're praising this
stuff. They know what they're doing.
And then on top of that, we'll come
to this in a second. Don't forget, by
the way, that you got the Tommy Robinsons
of the world
pushing the idea that the Muslim extremism idea.
This one is the idea, woman in Islam
with no choice. Oh my god. Look at
the horrifying burqa she's wearing. Right? Oops.
Hit the wrong button.
So he says, this has no place in
the 21st century. Well, you probably saw this
in the last show, but I wanted to
start with it for those that missed it.
In case you didn't see it, guess what,
guys? That's, believe it or not, I guarantee
people are still gonna pretend like this somehow
isn't true. Forward is a Jewish independent platform.
It says, guess what? Nope. That's not what
you think it is. Nope. It's not even
a woman in Imbirkah. That is a hot
80 degree day in Israel.
And it's sight of Beth
Shemesh, a Jewish woman and her 2 daughters
in a dark black yeah, guys. Because the
game they play is it's only these evil
Muslims except in Israel right now, orthodox Jewish
women in many cases are required to wear
head coverings. That is just a more extreme
version of it. That's in Israel, and that's
a Jewish woman.
Isn't that just the stupidest thing in the
world? But guess what? Tommy Robinson's gonna keep
using it to lie about even though many
of us are commenting down below. That's not
what that looks like. And, again, the point,
how little engagement this keeps getting. I don't
care who you are and what side you're
on. That kind of that kind of point
that somebody is wrong about always gets reached,
but it's not. It's getting
wildly suppressed on a platform that is totally
about free speech. Right, guys?
It's hilarious to me. But this, of course,
the post he shares, has 500,000 views. So
you have all these people going, oh, Muslims
are gross, and that's how we don't have
a place for that. Right? Well, we're gonna
come back to that in a second. You
know, the whole conversation about antisemitism?
Well, okay. Well, Tommy Robinson here is claiming
that this Jewish woman has no place in
the 21st century. Isn't that antisemitic?
Uh-oh. How much you wanna bet they don't
care about that version of it because, oh,
he was trying to call out Muslims and
made a mistake, so it's all okay.
That's the that's the kind of racism we
like.
God, this place is wild today, man. But
we'll come back to that too. Now
let's talk about this absurd story, the condom
story in Gaza, which we'll try to rapidly
go through. But here is the new
KGB.
Same I mean, guys, the whole thing is
people love to pretend like we were like,
we don't like her because she's a black
lesbian. It's like, well, that was your disgusting
racism in your mind. I didn't like her
because she was stupid, because she was an
uninformed
and terrible person for the job. So so
far, I'm kinda getting the same vibe. Somebody
who is just a girl well, they all
tow the line. Let's be clear. But I'll
hold back my judgment if you go further,
but I'm getting a very AJP vibe in
a very different way, but same kind of
dynamic. My point is
she is stepping up and giving you lies
already. Even though she made her big statement
about how that wasn't gonna be the case
this time, they always do.
Well, this guy just simply says he looked
into it, which I did too. And that's
why I said at the end of the
story or the show yesterday that I looked
into it. I did my own due diligence,
and I felt it was pretty explicitly clear
that that wasn't true.
Now there's more to the story where it
turns out why we can find out they
were lying about it, and I think they
knew what they were doing.
Or this is just how stupid they are,
right, or how incompetent they are. You can
choose. But let's listen to what she said
first.
Doge,
so they're already trying to pretend Doge is,
you know, cutting off money everywhere. Doge found
out all of it? Nope.
Not in the not in the sense of
Gaza anyway. So let's play the clip first.
Doge and OMB also found that there was
about to be 50,000,000
taxpayer dollars that went out the door to
fund condoms in Gaza. That Right. By the
way, just so we're clear, this is while
he's sending, and Biden and Trump and anyone
else that would be in that puppet position
are sending 1,000,000,000 of dollars to Israel to
commit a genocide. What we're gonna quibble about
something, by the way, is not actually going
to Gaza, but even if it was,
$50,000,000 for a group of people that are
being literally genocided. But that's what we're gonna
quibble about, right? It's it's all politics. And
on top of that, it's not even true.
That is a preposterous
waste of taxpayer money. So that's what this
pause is focused on, being good stewards of
tax dollars. And so this doesn't affect
on wheels for head start or disaster aid.
Again, it does not affect individual That that
he's getting that no. By the way, the
whole thing about the money that that the
main thing about the that's been rescinded. We'll
see how we continue on that, but I
I pulled that off today. So the bottom
line is
that's what we're, you know, that's what we're
gonna do. We're gonna look out for these
problematic things. We're gonna slice funds here and
there. Okay?
Now she no. She I guarantee she doesn't
know what she she's repeating what she's told.
That's what that job does. Still, though, accountability.
It's like any of the rest of them.
This person says he looked into it, and
US has spent exactly 0 for condoms. Now
to be clear, what she says is almost.
So even that alone, when I first looked
into him, like, okay. Well, maybe he's right,
and none was sent, but that's because they
stopped it. That was my first
evolving in this story.
This person, by the way, frustratingly enough, had
a whole thing on this, and they deleted
it. So I think this is how this
tends to work. Or to be clear, it
very well could be Twitter forcing them to
delete it. That's how this works too. But
I get the sense that people were pushing
back on this story, and so somebody who
was early on it going, that's false, then
got the Trump saying, we know what happened.
It probably deleted it, but he was right
in the 1st place. So oops. Shouldn't have
deleted it, but that's that's how this works.
People get pressured by partisanship.
Mohammed Shehadeh comes out, and this is a
different element to it, and says, no. The
US was never about to send $50,000,000 worth
of condoms to Gaza. Now here's why he
says that. Because Israel bans the entry of
condoms to Gaza, which they do, by the
way, in the first place, along with crutches,
seeded fruit, oxygen cylinders, water filtration systems, sleeping
bags, cancer all that's true. Maternity kits.
Because apparently, Hamas could use them to benefit
their children, so you're a bad guy. Whatever.
It's because they're punishing Palestinians. That's what's happening.
But here's the actual post so you can
see it.
And this is from
the IPPF statement on the escalating violence in
Gaza. Now the the point is this is
about before
the
yeah. Let's just say clearly before the transition
from Biden, Trump. Right? And it says basic
sexual and reproductive health care commodities like condoms
are banned in Gaza. Okay?
You could you could have made the argument
that this changed because, you know, Biden's out.
Trump came in, and we're gonna do it
anyway or whatever. Or maybe because of the
ceasefire, now there's different shape. But realize that
the thing they're pointing to,
and I can prove it because I'll show
you what they're actually either mistakenly or choosing
to mislead you on pointing to, was before
that took place. So this is still an
accurate point. They would have either been able
to know that it wouldn't been they wouldn't
have allowed me to do they wouldn't have
been able to do it in the 1st
place,
or that they would have been lying about
it, like, but just by simply looking at
the information. So the timing on this is
correct.
But if there was actually $50,000,000 in condoms
going to Gaza, it would have been a
time when this would have been banned anyway.
So me Mohammed is correct.
And there's he has a source for the
right there.
K. Now here's Times of Israel. This is
on the this is from
that it is from
today. And it says I don't know. You
know what's funny? I hate that. Pretty sure
this was yesterday. They just updated it, so
it says today. You know my thoughts on
that. That's pretty dishonest. But it says, Andrew
Miller, who served as deputy assistant secretary for
Israeli policy and affairs under former president Biden,
calls the claim outlandish. Now, of course, the
first thing you're gonna get from people who
are defending whatever Trump just said is that
Biden said it, so it's not true. The
Democrats are lying because they don't want Trump
to look. But, yeah, that's always possible. But
you blindly assuming that is pretty stupid, even
if it turns out to be correct. Because
that means you're just blindly assuming in the
interest of your side regardless of the facts,
even if it turns out to be right.
But it goes on to say it's possible
that 50,000,000
is put aside for sexual health or something
of that nature, which would include gynecology and
many other services, but definitely not condoms alone.
So this is the third point that undermines
the reality of this. And anybody with what
is worth their salt in any kind of
research would have found each one of these.
That's why I was already pretty clear before
the last point we're gonna show you. Drop
site news just blew this out of the
water.
But so the point he's making is that
look. The the amount is absurd if you
break it down with what we've already done.
Doesn't mean absolutely not possible, but it says
USAID
spending on injectable contraceptives,
contraceptive
implants, I EUDs, male condoms, oral contraceptives,
standard days method in female condoms amounted to
$60,000,000 over the entire year of 2023.
Think about that. And that was across the
entire globe.
See, an entire globe spending all through an
entire year was only 60,000,000, and they're claiming
50,000,000 was just for condoms for one shipment
to Gaza.
Certainly possible, but east the more you dive
in, the more this looks preposterous. And it
says moreover, no condoms went to the Middle
East, and the only country to receive a
small amount, which is only $45,000
worth, was Jordan.
Condoms generally cost less than $1 each in
the United States and much less in bulk.
Just over 2,000,000 people live in gossip, nearly
all of which have been have been heavily
damaged in the 15 month war with Israel.
The point is $1, 2,000,000,
Obviously, something's missing here. Okay? So all these
things together, if you're objective and nonpartisan, you
would have been like, yeah. This is one
of these stories. Either they've been misled or
they're trying to lie to you for their
own partisan reasons, both of which are absolutely
possible.
Libs of TikTok, like they usually do, just
dove into the story because who cares about
facts? We're the new media. Right? And it
says, you may be wondering why Gaza would
need $50,000,000
of condoms. You know, the thing that didn't
actually happen that I that is absolute fact
now because it's written on Twitter and she
said so.
You see the point? These people act like
they're trying to challenge and be the new
media. And I I think the little TikTok
is an absurdly, comically stupid ass.
There's people out there that are much more
journalistic in all this, but they do the
same things in this partisan circle. Where at
the end of the day, you're not checking
anything. You're going along with what the team
said and then defending what the team said
even when it turns out to be false.
Biden was going to fight. It's just because
they used them to make weapons.
It's just this is now there's a story,
by the way, in times of Israel. So
for that very matter, this whole thing could
be some ridiculous story. Usually is when it
comes from Israeli propaganda, but who knows? The
fact that they would use anything they need
to in order to fight back against their
occupation
seems to be,
what's the word?
Not in g
damn. I can't think of it now. But,
you know, in they're they are showing the
ability to think outside the box. Right? Like,
using any of that. But the point is
we don't even know.
But that's what they leap into, which, by
the way, Trump just said. So you can
see this cycle, and I'll play that clip
from you, where the full story comes out
through Trump's prop White House press staff,
then media like this, fake alternative media, jumps
in and gives you these false connections, and
then
Trump goes out and says it because then
it becomes this massive cycle and they all
start feeding off each other. But it goes
Biden was gonna fund terrorism.
Yeah. They all do, dummy. They all do,
including your sacred gospel speed. They all currently
do. Syria, they're all supporting it. All of
them. Trump, Biden, they all support the Israeli,
US, CIA, Mossad supported
Al Qaeda terrorism that is running Syria right
now. We'll get to it. But and Trump
stopped it.
Well, that's a little neat, though, isn't it?
They were sending condoms,
lots of money. They use them for terrorism,
and we're stopping terrorism. We just won
even though none of it's real.
Here's another example. Elon Musk just explains why
all the condoms were magnums.
Okay. There, you give them the out. They
can go, we all just trolled you, and
it wasn't even real even though you all
very much did play this as a very
real story.
And in in Trump, I'll play for you
right now, just announced this in front of
a lot of very serious people. But, autism
capital, of course, I wonder what the condoms
would be used for.
That they're, again, citing an Israeli article about
this. But, yes, anything could be used for
that, especially when you're under an occupation and
are being committed genocide against and need to
find ways to fight back. But how dare
they fight back against an ongoing evil regime
that is killing their children day after day?
But drop site news makes this very obvious.
So it goes turns out, United States did
send $50,000,000
for STT prevention to Gaza. $83,000,000
to be exact.
Just so happens it was sent to the
province of Gaza in Mozambique,
the country located in the southeastern coast of
Africa. Hamas in Gaza, you know, in Palestine,
did not receive $50,000,000
worth of the US condoms from that grant
like president Trump suggested earlier today.
In that process, we identified and stopped
$50,000,000
being sent to Gaza
to buy
condoms
for Hamas.
So he sent Hamas, just so we're clear
on that. So he either knows he's misleading
you for his own obvious reasons, which he's
done in countless amount of times,
or he just blindly was said what he
what he's told. Somebody fed it to him,
and he said it without even checking. Both
of which are very possible. 50,000,000.
And you know what's happened to them? They've
used them
as a method of making bombs. I guarantee
somebody sent him one of these tweets, and
now that's fact.
That's how that works, guys. You've realized this
is not some small side thing. We're talking
about the president of the United States and
how very flimsily you can see this this
trail of misinformation.
It's pathetic.
And you could even see he he highlights
this. Oh my god. They even took away
the fact check now. Damn it. I knew
I oh, there it is. Okay. Good.
But isn't that funny how it doesn't show?
See, there it is. I'm telling you, these
aren't by accident, guys. Twitter is playing these
games with the information. That's my opinion anyway.
But this person says, it took me some
manual analysis because there's a misspelling in the
grant in Gaza, But there does indeed and
pen appear to be STD prevention in Gaza.
But, no, it turns out when you actually
do your real due diligence that this is
for Mozambique. Now, by the way, this is
not because of the Twitter fact check. That
came out because drop site news made it
very clear even though they don't cite them
right there. That's typical how this works. But
the point is, it's not, guys.
So money is going out for by the
way, it doesn't even appear to be for
condoms. It says for,
where was it?
HIV prevention services, which includes in some part
of that. But you see, this is you
know, it seems I'm of the mind when
you really come to the full point of
this, that this means that they saw some
article from Israel about comms being used for
bombs, located some connected point, and decided to
make the story.
It's I think it's as easy as that.
And all the libs of TikTok morons out
there are gonna shout whatever they're told even
though it's false and then shout you down
with their 1,000,000 followers
even as it gets proven to be false.
Over and over and over and over and
over all day long. And they have every
right to do it. That's called free speech.
But we have every right to stand back
and say you're all a bunch of lying
idiots that are misleading people for your own
personal agendas.
I hope I hope people are continuing to
share this. Drop site news is definitely somebody
you should be checking out. But think about
that. He stood there in front of everybody
and just openly sold you
a false story.
Now the drones, I found this to this
I found this to be pretty interesting, in
fact. It's just these small manipulations around these
stories. Now, obviously, if you don't already know,
the my opinion and I think the honest
truth is that there is a government here.
Yes. They've got different opinions and different sides
and different circles and groups and different agendas
and different funding from different foreign entities, whatever
you wanna talk about. The point is that
at the end of the day, it's one
entity that knows it needs to come together
to keep you in check because they're most
afraid of you over anybody else. Historically, any
power structure is most afraid of the people
that can take that away from them. You
are that immediate threat in any context.
So my point is if you stand back
and look, it appears to be them always
in collusion with their well, even saying like
that suggests there's two sides. It's all just
them working against you. And so what we
can see here is a small example of
that where the story was already shown. It
was already discussed. Even Kirby, for crying out
loud, said basically exactly what they just broke,
the FFA loud, and they frame it as
Biden was carrying out an offer. Okay. If
you think Biden was carrying out an operation
against us, which I wouldn't disagree with, that's
not unique to Biden or Trump. It's your
government.
And what Trump just told you did not
break that story or whatever her name is.
I'm forgetting your name. The new press secretary.
I'll show you right now. So all this
became was it turns out they all knew
this was just a bunch of drones or
maybe it wasn't and they're now lying about
it. But the point is they all did
it, including Trump. All of them were aware
that this was not what they were claiming
it was. And simultaneously, let's not forget the
Alex Jones of the world. I told you
this would come to pass where they were
screaming every day about some new story looking
for nuclear weapons.
NORTHCOM said there was it's China. Oh my
god. Now it's Iran. The next day, it's
every day he came out with some new
bombshell story that was totally proven until now
we at least they're claiming it's not. Does
anybody wanna follow-up with that and go, hey,
man. What about all these fake stories you
put out day after day after day? Or
all the bombs about inauguration and the deep
state democrats gonna overthrow? Yeah. Well, I guess
that didn't happen.
I'm glad.
Maybe it's because he stopped it. Sure an
easy way to play that. Sort of like,
if you hadn't taken the shot, you would've
gotten more sick. Well, I guess we'll never
know. Seeing as how they both support those
shots, apparently. But Trump says New Jersey drones
authorized after suggesting Biden kept public in suspense.
Remember, Trump already alluded that he knew what
this was before,
sort of like the Nord Stream pipeline point
where he goes like, well, I know it
wasn't trial Russia, but I can't tell you
because we'd get us in trouble. Oh, so
you don't wanna put Biden in prison. Got
it. Thanks for clarifying that. The point is
it wouldn't be the country. It would be
the people that committed the crime. And if
Donald Trump is the president of this country,
decided to put Biden in prison for that
crime, that would be powerful. That would show
the world that we are not gonna stand
by and let these things happen. And in
fact, that would probably change the opinion of
the world about the US standing in international
law. But how much you wanna bet that
never comes to pass? He just made that
point in the interview. I'm not gonna say
who, but we know it wasn't Russia. Yeah.
We all do. And that's why he's allowed
to say that because we all know that.
We all know that JFK was killed by
the CIA and Assad. We all know that
Martin Luther King was killed by our own
government, at least involved with because it's a
civil case. They've proved that.
But let's let them break the story about
leaked information that they wanna dribble out for
you so you don't look at the technocratic
prison that's being built around you. Back to
the story.
Drones.
Okay. So the idea is that this was
something that was being used. As Rand Paul
pointed out, as we all told you, they're
just keeping this in your mind, whether it's
for some blue bean dynamic or just to
keep you on your toes wondering,
you know, how we're gonna stop the bad
guys, or maybe it's because they want you
know, all the different narratives that were used
around this.
They need you to react so they can
provide the solution. It says, quote, after research
and study,
the drones were that were flying over New
Jersey in large numbers were authorized to be
flown by the FFA for research and various
other reasons. That's a huge caveat right there
that we don't even know what that means.
But so that is, by the way, in
part, what they already told you during Biden's
administration. It's in this article. Many of those
drones were also hobbyists. Okay. So right now,
the ones screaming about one part of this
and saying, see, it was the FFA. They
knew. It's a it was an operation. Well,
that's not what she actually said. She said
some FFA.
She said other reasons. Some were hobbyists, recreational.
Others were private individuals that were enjoying drones.
Okay, so basically what she said is any
other normal day in this country with drones.
The same thing that they told you before.
I don't believe any of them.
You know, not that I shouldn't say I
don't believe them. I just don't take them
at face value. Any of
them. But it goes, in time, it got
worse due to curiosity. This was not the
enemy.
They're trying to do this. And I think
it's very obvious to anybody with even the
smallest amount of discernment.
People that want to choose a side, who
enjoy the game of 2 2 team sport
politics
love this stuff.
And they don't even care if it's true,
in my opinion. It's just about jumping in
and going, yeah. Those dumb Democrats.
That's how they say it. And same thing
on the other side, guys. Yeah. Those white
supremacists, Republicans. Like, these are just these are
children, in my opinion.
In December, it says, Trump suggested the Biden
administration
knew more than it was revealing to the
public. So right there, that means he then
would know, and he didn't tell you. So
he played a part in not also in
also not informing you. And it says, which
were spotted throughout the east coast, though Levitt
did not say whether the drones spotted outside
New Jersey were all awful.
So basically continuing to keep you in the
dark.
So nothing new. The same continuation of the
same game. And it says they know where
it came from and where it went, Trump
said. And for some reason, they don't wanna
comment and neither do you apparently.
Neither did you guys. So what's the difference
here? And it says, and I think they'd
be better off saying what it is. Okay?
Then say
it. Our military knows and our president knows.
And for some reason, they don't wanna keep
people safe. So just be clear, saying FFA
and other things and other reasons we can't
talk about is no different than what they
told you before.
So they're acting like they told you new
information. When they didn't, they basically repeated what
the Biden administration said, and all of his
followers jumped up and said, look. They proved
it, and it was Biden's fault. Based on
what?
It's just lazy, and people are going along
with it.
And it says, having close close oh, the
the point is, this is Biden and December
16th.
Don't take in any way as one side
versus the other. It's all your government lying
to you. But in 16th December, this is
what the Biden administration said. Having closely examined
the technical data and tips from concerned citizens,
we assess that the sightings that it to
date include
a combination of lawful commercial drones, hobbyist drones,
and law enforcement drones, as well as manned
fixed wing aircraft helicopters and stars mistaken as
drones.
So,
literally the same thing because understand commercial, that's
the FFA point. Then you got hobbyist, you
got law okay.
So, the only thing that changed is she
presented this as if we got a new
information and allowed all of the mindless followers
to jump.
It's pretty sad, isn't it?
So TrueStream Media covers this accurately.
So she simply says, well, here's the clip
for you.
Before I turn to questions, I do have
news directly from the president of the United
States that was just shared with me in
the Oval Office,
from president Trump directly,
an update on the New Jersey drones.
Or not. Right? So they may Trump made
sure. Tell them this. Not an update, repeating
exactly what the Biden administration said. A little
re with little different juxtaposition of the words,
but the same information. After research and study,
the drones that were flying over New Jersey
in large numbers were authorized to be flown
by the FAA.
Mhmm. Which is exactly what Biden told you
on 16th, or rather, I think it was
Kirby, but through the Biden administration. Right? For
research
and various other reasons.
The only other the and the various other
reasons could mean anything. Research and surveillance and
biometrics, which is exactly what Rand Paul told
you was happening. And that's probably why they
don't wanna mention that because the only group
driving that more than anybody right now is
Trump's administration, Palantir,
biometric wall, surveillance, technocrat. That's where that is.
So they wanna step right around that, but
make you think Biden, Biden, Biden.
Many of these drones were also hobbyists,
recreational,
and private individuals that enjoy flying drones. Okay.
And things like that are what the Posobics
of the world just casually left off the
conversation.
In meantime in the in time, it got
worse due to curiosity.
This was not the enemy. Right. Okay. So
it got worse because they wanted that to
be the case. They allowed you guys to
pull your hair out screaming about it. Now
let's be clear. It still could be something
bigger
because I I would never pretend we know.
The point is you didn't know then. We
don't know now. It very well could be
a part of what they just said, and
that's covering up some larger agenda, whether any
number of things that you could fit into
this possible story, whether Iran, aliens, I mean,
any number of things are possible. The point
is that they allowed you guys to go
crazy about it, and all these partisan grifters,
mostly on the right at this point, the
Twittersphere, were screaming about everything, and Jones was
leading the charge. If you can't see that
by now, you don't care.
I wanna be clear about that. It is
objectively clear what just went down. And, again,
whether we even know what the reality is,
they were pushing things all over the place
that did not line up. And to this
very point,
they're now falling back into this position.
That's just simple partisan games because that's propaganda.
A a statement from the president of the
United States to start this briefing with some
news. And with that, I will turn it
over to quest Gosh. She just seems like
she's pretending.
I'm I'm really gonna try to hold back
my judgment just because we'll wait and see.
Just because somebody's young doesn't mean that they're
not, you know, or I just I get
a very, very immature sense from her. That's
my opinion. We'll come back to it, and
we'll we'll judge as we go forward. But
Truisty Media says so they so they knew
what the drones were the whole time. And
they just wanted everyone, including members of local
and state government, wasting time in meetings with
no answers. Think of how wild that is.
Just spend weeks freaking out about nothing. And
let's be clear, they didn't add anything new.
So they also continue the game.
Just a thought, sharing the same thing, says
various other reasons, right, including normalizing drone tracking,
surveilling, and other wherefore
excuse me. Even warfare. I was gonna say
other warfare, and I said it wrong.
The point though was Rand Paul came out
and said, look. This is what they tried
to roll out while we weren't paying it
while we're all distracted by the drones, which
was allowing the drones into combat the bad
drones
to steal information from your phone, to scan
your biometrics.
Oh, I see. So it had nothing to
do with the drones. It was a means
to an end to get you to accept
more technocratic surveillance.
Exactly what we're all telling you is coming.
Literally, Rand Paul walked out and nobody barely
even got in conversation about that. You know
why? Because right now, it's you're not supposed
to talk about that in the TeamSport Republican
side because that's their bread and butter.
Not supposed to be public, but that's what's
happening. It says, make no mistake, Gaza, Ukraine,
other parts of the world that the US
has funded war
in have been experiments in total digital control
that will come home, like Israel, Palantir,
Lavender, Habsora. They're testing these things, guys, right
now on people that the world's trying to
ignore.
Jack Posobiec, of course, comes out and says,
breaking Trump White House confirms. New Jersey drones
were authorized by Biden. That's not what she
said.
You see how
willfully dishonest these people are. Okay? Now realize,
he could argue, he could be claiming that
that I know is the case because of
my research. That's not what he's saying. He's
saying White House confirms. You just heard what
she said. That's not what she said. She
said it was FFA, what, compliant or, you
know, allowed, and then hobbyists,
police,
which, by the way, was the same thing
they said on December 16th. So Posobiec is
a liar. He's choosing to misrepresent this for
his own partisan reasons. What else are we
talking about?
I mean, this and look. Here here's a
crazier example, in fact. Bret Weinstein
sharing Nick Sorter, who's in the same group,
breaking. Levitt reveals drones were flown over Jersey
by authorized FFA for research purposes. This is
not the enemy. Why did Biden lie? So
up until that point, I would have been
good. He he just shared what she said.
Why did Biden lie?
I just showed you what they said.
They're just either this bad at their job
or are trying to misrepresent it. In fact,
I think it's both.
But Weinstein shares that, which by the way,
he's been bumping up against
clumsily trying to call out Whitney Webb and
then being torn apart because he doesn't know
what he's talking about. I'm not saying he's
a stupid person. What I'm saying is he
keeps trying to call out Whitney Webb for
things that she never said or things that
she's covered a 1000 times over that they
pretend she's never pointed. It's embarrassing. But that's
because I think people like this are are
leaning into people like that. And if you're
gonna believe Nick's order, you're gonna get misled.
Are you gonna believe people out there that
are partisan manipulators? You're gonna fall into those
traps. But it says, the Biden apparently ran
a psychological experiment on the citizens of New
Jersey and the nation without informed consent. Oh,
my god. When's the last time we saw
that? Oh, operation war speed, Donald Trump, and
then through Biden. Right? The point
is that, yes, I think your government is
always doing this. But to try to slice
it out as one part, even though they
just continued the operation,
is really stupid.
That's partisanship for you though. And I think
these people are choosing to be dishonest. That's
my opinion. But let's not forget,
during all of that, you had Palantir putting
out advertisements
in December at the navy Army Navy game
for drones.
Pretty silly not to point that out during
the psychological operation point because realize, they know
I the in my opinion, why they don't?
Because
because you can't make that only about Biden.
Right now, this is Palantir. That's Trump's administration.
That's what this is, and they don't wanna
point it out.
And don't forget, Palantir is working with Israel
to commit a genocide. This is when they
partnered with them in January 2024,
over a year of ongoing genocide, and they're
happy. Alex Karp and Teal partnering with the
most obvious genocide in history.
Next manipulation.
This one was pretty ridiculous. And, again, this
is about the Gavin Newsom. Like, if you
read the comments, it's all people going, yeah.
Go after Gavin Newsom. Gavin Newsom is a
criminal, but so is Donald Trump. The point
here is he says and here's his Truth
Social just directly from it. This is somebody
this is his,
I guess, a Truth Social Relay for Twitter.
But here's true social. It says, the United
States military just entered the great state of
California. As far as I can tell, and
even as she just reported, that's not true.
Under emergency powers, turned on the water, flowing
abundantly. So now you're rational. Even though it
didn't happen, at least as we can prove,
you're rationalizing the idea that you sent in
military
into a state under emergency powers. Isn't that
what we've been warning about? So I think
this was
actually
intentional
to see how we would react.
But it says, turn down the water flowing
abundantly from the that's not true either. The
days of putting the fake environmental argument over
the people, they're really trying to bait you
into the woke
the the the things that are real, by
the way. The the green manipulation,
climate change, woke politics, because those things are
means to an end.
If we don't see that by now, then
I don't think you even understand the great
reset in technocracy that's happening. But these are
still important because they have real world real
world effects. But they're at a point, guys,
where they've already stepped over this. They're already
using these ploys to keep you divided, keep
you looking anywhere other than what they're currently
building. And that's what I believe very strongly.
So when we have people like Melee at
the Davos going, you know, the 2 gen
2 genders and woke politics. And you got
all of the right manipulators going, we did
it. He she bucked the whole system. Meanwhile,
the rest of the 99.9%
of the Davos conversation about where it's all
going that Trump and Malay were a part
of is all the things they're rolling out
while you're distracted by woke politics.
Works like a charm.
Played like a fiddle.
The point here,
the fake environmental argument. Alright? So instead of
focusing on the fact they just lied about
this, it's all about the woke politics.
But either way,
military, emergency powers, there's a reason this is
being framed this way. Now first was just
Reuters saying California denies it. But California is
could very much deny something that would happen.
That wouldn't surprise me. All politicians are quite
dishonest.
But what was interesting oh, I think I
had,
the important part is just it's just simply
saying that they denied it. That's not what
happened, and I'll just read it directly from
this article. Now this is by the way,
just as this is followed up, and I'll
play directly from her speech at the press
conference, it's it's not what happened. But here's
what it says. The military did not enter
California,
according to the agency, on its verified account.
And this is the,
which one was it? The California Department of
Water Resources publicly disputed this and says the
federal government restarted
federal water pumps after they were offline
for maintenance for 3 days.
So not only does it not have to
do with what was just going on in
the context of, you know, like some long
term thing, but it also is something that
was federal government, not military, and was scheduled
to go back on anyway.
State water supplies in Southern California remain plentiful.
Now I
just to be clear, California is rife with
corrupt with corruption, especially on the water infrastructure.
I've shared this millions of times About all
the different times they've been sent 1,000,000,000 and
1,000,000,000, both through Trump and Biden's administration, by
the way. From 2020 all the way through
Biden's last administration, they kept sending 1,000,000,000 and
1,000,000,000,000,000
to California
for water infrastructure. So funny that they wanna
make the point now even though Trump was
signing off on it the whole time during
his last administration. And I was calling it
out back then going, what's going on in
California? Where's all this money going? You think
he couldn't connect the dots then? It's all
about a means to an end. The point
here is that this appears to be the
reality of this, and this is even what
she just said in this conference.
On California, could you please clarify what the
military did with the water last night as
referenced in the president's truth social post? The
water has been turned back on in California,
and this comes just days after president Trump
visited Pacific Palisades.
And as you all, saw,
applied tremendous
pressure
on state and local officials in Pacific Palisades,
including Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass,
to turn on the water and to direct
that water,
to places in the south and in the
middle of the state, that have been incredibly
dry, which has led to the expansion, the
rapid expansion of these fires. Alright. Okay. So
so not the military then. Okay. So it
was a lie, just so we're all clear.
A complete and absolute lie. It was it
was them requesting something that was planned to
happen in 3 days anyway.
It's all a narrative, guys. This is about
getting people on board with a certain narrative,
knowing that they were gonna turn it back
on. Hey. Let's just lie about that. We'll
get a whole bunch of momentum. Well, Bad
Guy California and all the all the people
on our side will pretend Gavin's lying about
it. Easy.
They know who you are, and they know
how to play you.
If you just keep you keep playing the
team sport game, you the what's what's funny
about it is you people in this team
sport politics, which I believe is the minority,
really love to pretend like they're on his
side. Like, you guys are fighting the democrats.
The truth is that they're using you. They're
playing you with things that you think you
want.
Very transparently, in fact, because they're not on
a different side. Now what I think is
important to recognize is that, one, it's just
another continuous series of lies in order to
get you in a very very particular partisan
position. Now on top of that, we're talking
about how in almost an experimental sense, like,
through Twitter and others, we're watching this play
out where they're seeding false narratives. They're just
blatantly from whole cloth,
and then watching as they dick. They literally
full in some cases, roll out to borderline
main 3 media.
So this is where I found this to
be important. Charlie Kirk says, breaking White House
press secretary Caroline Levitt Levitt Levitt, Levitt, Levitt,
make some new huge news about changes to
which outlets will be allowed into the Brady
Briefing Room, podcasters, bloggers, social media influencers. Now
I think it's if if you're actually going
to expand this into a nonpartisan objective grouping
of people, then then I would say good.
Something tells me we know that's not gonna
happen. Realize that we just went through all
these people that they would point to, all
the people that are gonna blindly parrot what
they're being told, and they're gonna be framed
as the podcaster, blogger, and social media influencers.
Like, I thought that was funny.
Is this I mean, so you're gonna I
I I actually should have thought of I
should have found a good example. I was
thinking about this last time. Like, some really
ridiculous, like, you know,
some person that's, like, a TikTok influencer that
has no idea what they're talking about, but
they love Trump, and they're they're gonna be
asking Trump. You know where this goes. It'll
be the this is the reorganization.
This is the new mainstream media being presented
in some new way to podcasts and bloggers
even though it's gonna be hand selected by
the people that are very much in one
position. Now they'll be your token differences. I
guarantee it.
Do you think they're gonna invite people that
are actually gonna ask real questions like they
don't want Sam Husseini in there in other
context for the state department? It'll be the
same dynamic. I hope I'm wrong, but everything
in our history, everything we've seen up until
this point argues that's the case. So, again,
you can hope over here, but we can
lean into the facts over here. I'm gonna
lean into the facts. Well, still having hope
that it might happen. But hope should not
be the only thing that drives you to
make a choice.
But here is where this is gonna go.
Fox News say, hey, Trump White House is
rolling out a new social media account that
aims to hold fake news accountable.
Oh, okay. So the same thing. Right? So
it's the same it's just about as stupid
as pretending, like, we don't want fact checks,
but now it's okay because we have our
fact checks on Twitter. Well, it's the same
game.
You just are okay with it because you
feel like it's going in the direction that
you like. That's a childish thing to think,
guys. This is the same deal. You're gonna
have them telling you what you're supposed to
say and the reality of the story that
they wanna put forward, and you're gonna pretend
like you're fighting the evil guys, rebels fighting
the deep state. This is the power structure.
This is the White House. This is the
top of the pyramid in the context of,
you know, I don't think that in the
context of the real power, but in the
context of how we're supposed to view the
current political structure.
And they're gonna be telling you, this is
what the story is. Here's how they're lying
about it. And many of them are gonna
go, that's the truth because they said.
So what you're doing is effectively taking the
top of the pyramid. You're taking the president's
word when journalists are supposed to be questioning
more than anything that position.
Is that funny? Because the only way this
makes sense is they still see themselves as
rebels fighting the deep state when they are
literally the opposite of that.
Trump White House rolls out social media account
to hold fake news accountable.
You mean, like, the fake news we just
read coming directly from his mouth and his
team and the people that he's gonna point
to in this group? Yep. Those people. They're
gonna make sure they challenge the fake news
by spreading fake news.
And, of course, as an over a side
point, Meta,
Facebook,
whistleblowers are now showing that they changed their
codes to manipulate millions of algorithms in favor
of Israel.
Right? So we're no more fact checks. We're
on the good guy libertarian side as we
start censoring information on Israel like everybody.
Oh, all we're seeing is a shift, guys.
And it's it's again,
they they were so import it was so
important to get you to think they was
all about censoring pronouns and woke
ideology, and you took the bait. Now those
things, again, they're important conversations to have. The
point is that what they really wanted was
for you to follow along. The pied piper
you right into this controlled structure.
And look at the co the coordination. All
the people that we were all telling you
were enemies, that you all agree with were
enemies, are now on your side.
I'm speaking to the TeamSport Republicans, but the
the reality is, guys, this is all across
the board. They're setting up the new structure.
It's right in front of you. Now on
RFK Jr,
I think it's important to make a couple
comments on this. This was from health. Ethics
disclosure reveal RFK Jr owns stake in gene
editing firm as Maha revolts over new back
Trump backed mRNA project.
This is the 24th
January, and it says RFK Junior has invested
in biotech companies that use gene editing
technology that he previously cautioned against in his
his state senate confirmation ethics paperwork revealed. Now
interesting
that he has ethics paperwork.
Right? And shows something that seems to be
uncomfortable for people. Funny how we don't get
that from Trump. We don't get that from
Pam Bondi. We don't get that from a
lot of the Zionist influenced people. I wonder
why.
It's amazing how the Democrats aren't screaming about
how they're not signing ethics pledges. I wonder
why. Maybe because they're all on the same
side, guys.
But it goes on to say, Kennedy holds
divided,
holds
Dividend rights. I was wondering what I for
some reason, I was reading that. It was
something different.
But so so dividend rights to multiple biotech
firms, including a stake in CRISPR Therapeutics, which
is very important to this conversation, guys. CRISPR,
the bio the COVID 19 injections, all this
stuff overlaps. This is
gene editing.
Ethics paperwork he filed in his bid to
be confirmed is HHS.
It says research on CRISPR gene editing for
gene therapy applications shows it can lead to
massive damage of chromosomes
known as, what is it, chromothoprisis?
The prisis? Can lead to cancer
and an inherited disease in any child affected
patient. Kennedy wrote that in 2021,
But now invest in a company. But I
think it's only, like, $45,000
or
oh, only $15,000.
Not not that much.
The point, though,
is hypocrisy, I think. And on top of
that, recognizing that what he just said was
the gene therapy, you know, otherwise known as
cancer or, mRNA shots,
cause cancer. Well yeah. And here's your mRNA
shot for cancer.
He knows all of this, guys. You know
he does. Now it says he also sounded
the alarm on Microsoft, the Bill Gates founder's
use of CRISPR, warning the Gates and the
World Economic Forum, both frequently targets of Kennedy's
harsh rhetoric, our prime purveyors of the technology.
Now there seem to be overlapping just like
we told you they would. Now an important
point, I think. Even if it's a small
amount, I do think that's important.
Now Whitney Webb points out
about the overlap of RFK Junior. Jamie Dore
says, all the worst people in the world
are organized against RFK Junior. I'm adding my
list to support him.
Whitney simply adds, please also consider opposing opposing
the nomination of the man proposed to be
his number 2 in HHS
under Kennedy,
Jim O'Neil.
Who wants to deregulate the biotech market and
flood the US with mRNA gene therapy products
by eliminating efficacy tests that can't pass?
Think about it, guys. This is the same
dynamic of the
the platform.
They just pump in new information like a
computer system, and they pump out the new
thing. That's what they already told you they're
trying to do. It just spectacularly failed. We
can prove that, and so they're trying to
reorganize, I think. The point, though, as she
points out in the next tweet, I think,
is that, ultimately, it's not even up to
him. This person's been chosen by the Trump
side of this.
So if we're gonna pretend like it's a
good thing, let's be real about what we're
looking at. Now, look. I argue
even if our I mean, I I'm very
concerned about RFK because of his stance on
Israel. Simple. That seems to that seems to
challenge almost everything else. But I still argue
that his work around this is a positive
change.
I just have concerns that it it's not
really what he wants to accomplish. But my
point is if we're gonna be stand back
and look at all of it, his
possible positives are very much more than the
other people in the circle. Now in no
way would I argue that before a selection
process to make that the reason we vote
for a lesser of evils, same stance I
would take. I'm I don't want any of
them. If we're we're being if we're only
given selective choices and they're all bad, then
why would I choose a lesser choice? But
now that we're in a position where it's
not our choice anymore, and I never argue
it never was, my point is if you're
gonna be choosing between the people they're pointing
to, he seems to have more positives. But
I'm just I'm still up in the air.
I'm gonna wait for outcomes, which we all
should be doing.
But the reality is it's pretty clear
all of this does not seem to be
going the direction that we thought it was,
like with the seed oil point I'll make
here in a second.
But 7 seas from the iconic points out,
Whitney perfectly explains why nominating RFK Junior
matters very little in the terms of an
of the upcoming agenda. Odds are, even if
they do confirm him, that it'll be the
same sort of shallow gesture as the CBDC
ban from last week. Right? Because remember, that
ban, not only did it leave its own
little caveat,
except required by law, but it also we
as Whitney and Mark have been talking about,
it seems to be already going in the
direction of the stablecoin
private dynamic,
which as Kathryn Austin Phipps has repeatedly pointed
out, is way, way worse than a regular
CBDC.
But, of course, all the Republicans pretending to
fight that know that, hear us talking about
it, but prefer to call you black pill.
Prefer to call and make pretend that you're
all about doomsday.
Yeah. The same thing they were yelling at
us before the selection, and now everything we
said was happening is coming to pass.
Funny how that works. But it says, also
a friendly reminder that RFK referred to the
genocide in Gaza as a moral war for
Israel and the company he keeps with rabbi
Shmueli, which seems to have been a while
since then, but does seem to be the
case. This is a new article from
unlimited hangout. Long time Thiel associate, Jim O'Neil,
so another connection back to Peter Thiel and
Palantir,
is set to manage HHS operations whether RFK
Junior is confirmed or not. So we're gonna
pretend that RFK Junior is in charge of
anything if he's not even picking his second
in command?
His views and business ties strongly suggest he
will push for mRNA and other experimental medtech
to flood the market.
Now, Liz Churchill comes out and says, this
is what winning looks like.
Right? You know why?
Because this Democrat got removed from the building.
But how is that winning?
What's the positive outcome for health policy or
for the for the USDA? Oh, I get
nothing yet. You just like the Democrat got
put in their place. Right? If that's all
we care about, kindergarten is that way. Okay?
It says security physically removed her, which by
the way, as far as I could tell,
didn't actually happen. She was escorted out of
the building.
Now, the point is, apparently, this person was
fired by Trump. Now, I honestly didn't even
wanna waste the time to get into, like,
the dynamic.
Like, I don't think it says, like, you're
fired, instantly leave the building. I think there's
some process to it.
Either way,
not important in the conversation today, I think,
in a larger sense of things. Either way,
as I understand it from what I've read,
she didn't leave, and so they escorted her
out. But all these accounts, like next order,
for example, are framing this as capital letters
physically removed from the building. They want you
to think she was dragged from the building,
which doesn't seem to be the case. But,
again, I could be wrong. It simply says,
she Phyllis Fong as she refused to accept
that she was fired. Again, I do you
is that what she said? I mean, who
even knows what actually happened? Based on what
we keep seeing from partisan manipulation, it could
be very well that she was trying to
accomplish one last thing, and they just decided
to make this part. Who knows? It's all
very petty right now. But here's Nick. The
USDA the USDA inspector general was physically removed.
You read the articles for yourself.
This says escorted out of the building.
So maybe they didn't even touch her. So
did they physically touch her arm, or did
they just walk her out? I would argue
if they walked her out. Again, a pretty
small, silly point. My point is how dishonest
these people are with even import even things
that are you could take this and just
go, she was forced to leave. Wouldn't that
be more in you just have to lie
about everything apparently.
But it says,
she was forced to physically remove from her
office by security after refusing to comply with
Trump's firing. Trump's given her his orders. They're
not negotiable. You're fired. Get out. Guys, we're
dealing with children.
Like petty small, lowest common denominator type people.
You're fired. Get out.
We should miss this worthy of ridicule. Even
at this in which I'm of the mind,
they're all problematic. Her, him, Trump, all of
them. They're all politicians that don't actually care
about you. The point because my reason I
say that all the time is because they
wanna make it out to be that you're
fighting for one side, but that's what they're
doing. That's what's funny.
But it just feels small.
Gleefully, you know, shouting. I mean, come on,
guys. For I the for all we know,
this woman, you know
yeah. It doesn't matter. The point is you
they will demonize these people just because of
the d by their name. For me, it's
about the government in any context. But I
can also recognize that there's people on left
and right of the paradigm that aren't everything
they make them out to be.
Carey points out though as they wanna tell,
this is what winning looks like. Right? Look
at us. We made that Democrat look stupid.
We're all winning. Right? Oh, what I guess,
what about this though? What about Maja appointing
a seed oil lobbyist
to be chief of staff for the USDA?
You know, the group you were just pointing
at. So you're more consumed with getting rid
of somebody that you don't like as opposed
to putting a seed oil lobbyist as the
chief of staff for that very group.
Winning.
This is either the the the the
the deliberate misdirection
of these people supporting this by pretending to
support the good things or that they're just
as easy to mislead by the people they
think they're fighting for.
Putting a seed oil lobbyist to this position
is the opposite of winning.
At least what they pretend what they wanted,
Maha,
as Kerry pointed out.
Now Stargate, we talked about. Trump partners with
technocrats to promote mRNA injections, AI, and transhumanism.
The whole mRNA direction part of this, I
think, is important as well. Couple of clips
I wanted to share on this.
First, David Dickinson made a good point here.
How many executive orders has Trump signed already?
100, in fact.
Do any of them stop the mRNA COVID
shots?
Shouldn't that have been number 1 that he
signed?
Crickets.
Even amongst the inner circle. Isn't that interesting?
Well,
New York Post writes movement grows to put
Trump's face on Mount Rushmore
alongside Lincoln, Washington.
What are we waiting for? Right? We're winning.
That's what matters. Right? Who cares about the
shots we all fought against that are killing
children to this very day that he still
supports? Let's get his face on there. Dumb
Democrats. We're winning.
I know you guys are not this stupid.
I know you're not this easy to manipulate.
This is so meaningless. Like, the Gulf of
America, guys, they're just point that like, they're
it's about it's bread and circuses, guys. That's
what this is. You're being manipulated.
And the point is this doesn't appear to
be a joke. And at the very least,
a joke or not, it's real and it's
happening. Here is representative Ana Paulina Luna saying
I've officially introduced legislation to put president Trump's
face on Mount Rushmore. Now it could be
that this was floated as a joke by
partisans online and somebody like this saw an
opportunity
and decided to do it anyway. Because knowing
they'll even jokingly support it and then it's
supported all the way through after it's suddenly
not a joke anymore. Well, the whole time
pretending like you fell for the troll until
it becomes real. His remarkable accomplishments for our
country, really, and the success he will continue
to deliver deserve the highest recognition.
I mean, just think about how dumb it
is to pretend that Trump, of all the
people we could point to, all of which,
by the way, have their own reasons why
none of them should be praised, in my
opinion, for the most part.
But you're gonna pretend that he, in his
career, despite Operation Warp Speed, despite killing and
assassination, overthrowing but he deserves to be alongside
those people with these iconic careers.
It's it's ignorant, guys, and it's laughable.
They're doing it probably just to make people
upset, but Steve says
winning because that's what matters.
Corey, did Corey Lynn of Corey's digs just
quickly to break this down, makes it a
good point about the WHO.
Saying Trump said he's pulling out of the
funding of the WHO,
but the WHO is still deeply embedded throughout
the United States
as is the United Nations.
Now what they base what she basically breaks
down is there's other groups of this, the
Pan American Health Organization,
right, OAS,
that are still very much immersed through all
of this. And the point being, if you,
you know, just simply cut to the chase,
it's important to note that these privileges and
immunities
given to it in the 76 international organizations
by the president can only be removed
by a president, in this case, for the
US by Trump or whoever be in power.
So the point is interesting that, yes, the
WHO move is a positive one.
The question is if they're they're already working
with Gates, as it clearly seems to be
the case, it's probably the same shell game
as before,
which got a weird lot of pushback by
people that are the ones we're just calling
out before. I think we know why. But
on top of it, then it may just
be like another
GARM thing. Where, yes, they go, look, we
stopped it. But when you really look, they
really didn't. It's still all there. The structure
still exists. So in this case,
if Trump wanted to fully stop this dynamic,
he could. And what she's pointing out is
he hasn't yet. Doesn't mean he won't. But
if you were gonna do this, you wouldn't
stop at the WHO. You would make sure
this is you know, so what the point
is is much of a much bigger dynamic,
and I think we're being played with a
shell game just like before.
And this person says,
well, this is interesting on the side note.
They're saying something has me concerned that their
job, their this is a Trump supporter with
the Trump, you know, fight fight thing on
there, saying we recently had to fill out
a survey at work where they basically state
we will lose some of our benefits in
order to implement a wellness program. It will
require regular doctor's visits and biometric scanning.
Lines up with 2030.
Funny how this starts in the post technocratic
Trump administration.
Interesting.
On top of that, Ian Carroll says a
story of the next 4 years.
And everyone's been using this meme of, I
forget her name, standing there with all of
them looking. And the joke is meant to
be they're all looking at her,
and it simply says a global digital surveillance
state. Right? The joke being all of them
are desperate to achieve a global digital yes.
Yes. That's the reality.
Just a thought says, it would have been
awesome if you had raised more awareness of
this before the election and used your influence
to spread awareness of the incoming technocracy and
how why these tech billionaires are sitting alongside
Trump instead of telling your followers to vote
for him.
Ian Carroll says, first, defeat Kamala, then deal
with Trump.
You know? That's that's embarrassing in my opinion.
And it says, I look forward to seeing
how you use your influence to, quote, deal
with Trump and expose his connections to Israel
and technocratic billionaires like Musk and Teal, which
in some cases, he's done. In other cases,
it seems like he's pulled some pretty large
punches, but you guys can decide. I'm I'm
I'm kinda in the middle right now whether
he's, you know, as he says, new to
this and he's being manipulated by larger accounts
or if he's you know, because there's cases
on this that I think is it's hard
to deny. Overall,
defeat Kamal then deal with Trump is you
being played.
If you believe that, you're being played. Because
right now, all it is and if if
you deal with Trump, that means you're acknowledging
that they're all bad.
And all you did was usher in the
technocratic state because you were tricked by the
2 party paradigm. That's what I think.
This person says, you see this? He's implying
Q is isn't a psyop, Ian Carroll, saying
something about this. You know, basically implying that
Q is something real, and it goes, wow.
It's pretty bad. You know, I think q
is a larger influence on this administration than
we realize.
Now where we at on this? About an
hour?
Let's see. Yeah. I was gonna play through
these. And we're gonna after this, we're gonna
spend the rest of the, you know, remaining
however much time on the entire conversation of
the ceasefire.
But I thought it was important to talk
about a couple of things on RFK overlapping
with the COVID 19 direction.
Alex Zach said this.
During his confirmation hearing, RFK Jr reiterated
that he is not anti vaccine, that he
is pro vaccine,
which, by the way, I've made I've made
clear for a long time. He's always made
that point. That's not new. He very clearly
has said, I'm pro vaccine. He just wants
the science to be clear and doesn't like
the COVID vaccines. No. That that's clear. But
it is important to point out that a
lot of people that support him don't believe
that,
and a lot of people that don't support
him
claim the opposite of what he said. It's
very interesting. It's just that's partisanship for you.
Everyone's lying all the time, it seems. But
the point is that he has maintained that,
but I think that's a contradictory stance for
a lot of people on the Republican side
that think that they're fighting all vaccines, which
is why a lot of the left frames
him as being against all vaccines. And he's
he's really never made that point. Not not
as he's made
more open statements about how there's a lot
more to be worried about in certain podcasts.
But as my far as I can tell,
he's never came out and said all that.
He's always left open the caveat that some
you know, it's a really, as he says
in the in the hearing, the the most
the the most important thing we've ever done
kind of a thing, which I don't agree
with that. But it says
that he is pro vaccine, that vaccines play
a critical role in health care, and that
operation warp speed, and this is the one
I think is most concerning, was an extraordinary
accomplishment.
That's what he said. I'll play it. It's
important to note that he's made several of
these statements on multiple occasions before this hearing.
His question for people listening,
is he, quote, playing the game, which a
lot of people wanna pretend, like with Israel
too. He's just doing it to get into
power, and then it will all change. Well,
certainly possible, but I think that's a very
dangerous game to play and almost always turns
out to be not what you think, historically
speaking.
But just to get his foot in the
door, or is he revealing his true thoughts
and feelings related to vaccines?
It's a good question.
Now here
is the conversation. I'll just play the the
I think just the oh, it's only 1
minute, but just the the part where he
says this.
As science is unobstructed
by vast or economic interest.
That's good. I got that culture, and I'll
just say about operational warp speed.
It was an extraordinary accomplishment.
Should demonstration of leadership by president Trump.
When he
when he promoted operation warp speed, he was
looking at all of the different remedies, including
vaccines. Therapeutics, everything. Therapeutic, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine,
famtitabine,
even chlorine dioxide.
All and he was not looking at shutting
down our country for the year, forcing people
to wear masks for a year.
All, forcing all social distancing that did not
have any scientific basis, which doctor Fauci has
now acknowledged. He said we took it out
of thin air. Isn't that funny?
Now who knows? It's up for you to
decide. I wouldn't necessarily push back. I'm more
of the mind that I think that Trump
was played in a lot of ways during
all of this, which is, by the way,
what his own support base now tells us.
Right? He listened to the wrong advisers. Okay.
Well, there you go. So the point is
that, nonetheless, he's still responsible for all that.
But you could argue they're all making this
up too. That how do we know for
sure it's just him telling you what he
thought? But think about how funny that is.
Alright. Again, little Ryan over here telling you
2020, literally in the first so many months
of this, that the masks are not held,
not statistically
significant reducing transmission. Remember that hill we died
on and got pushed back for everybody until
years in the conversation when it became public
knowledge, and we all knew the whole time.
And still still people like us who are
making these statements, who are very clearly getting
censored for it, never barely outside of you
got the recognition for being correct on the
story. Not that that's what it's about.
But understand that in a in a dynamic
that we're in today, if you're in this
field, well, yes, there is a level of
importance to being seen to be correct so
you can continue to grow your following, so
you can continue to get more influence in
the conversation.
My point is that you guys continue to
see it. My track record, TLab's track record
through all of us is exemplary.
Now, yes, you can call them that. You
could say I'm promoting myself, but the point
is that's objectively clear. Look for yourself. And
I'm not saying about, like, narratives we disagree
on. I'm saying about things that were contradictory
or rather, contentious
until later it comes to the point to
where everyone's forced to essentially acknowledge at least
part of it. And that part of it
was the main point we were making.
Many, many, many, many, many times consecutively over
the years, we've been right well ahead of
these stories.
It's not because I'm psychic. It's because we
just are balanced. We're objective, and and we've
made mistakes too. But think about that. Fauci
admits it. You know? And all these people
are these Johnny come lately step in and
act like they always knew. The Weinstein, the
Tuckers of the world are out there acting
like we all knew the they were the
ones pushing the lies in the beginning.
Oh,
but my,
but all of those changed during the Biden
administration.
And I became very narrowly focused. We ended
up with the worst,
the highest death count of it. Well, the
reality is clear that it was a hand
off, guys. I'm of the mind that no
matter who is in the second administration after
they started this, it would have gone the
same direction, whether it's Biden first then Trump
or Trump first then Biden.
Of course, we can never know, but we
can't deny the facts that he still to
this day supports those things. Donald Trump still
argues that saved lives. We all know that's
not true. I don't know how anybody gets
past that.
But Whitney says, sorry, but Operation Warp Speed
was not an extraordinary accomplishment, Kennedy. It was
a military operation to normalize mass use of
gene therapies that previously couldn't make it through
chronic clinical trials and get them into market
via an emergency deregulatory
paradigm, give CIA front Palantir access to American
health data and mass welfare for corrupt big
pharma firms at the public's expense. Now we
saw that come to fruition.
Larry Ellison and Oracle talking about using these
databases for the training of the. Guys, it's
as transparent as I've ever seen this roll
out.
And I don't know how RFK wouldn't know
that, but that's for you to decide.
Now here's another side of it. Now this
is why this is so funny. Now who
knows whether these mindless people in congress are
just put there by others that want people
to you know, who knows how the dynamic
is?
I'm of the mind these people are so
far out of the know, it's embarrassing. But
they think they're in the know because they're
being puppeteered by some lobbyist or whether APAC
or some other dynamic.
But what's funny is you got RFK Jr
sitting there, who, by the way, is correct
on basically every health conversation he's having despite
supporting a genocide, which contradicts damn near everything
he's doing. Nonetheless,
whether it's autism or vaccine, he's right about
these things. The scientific research is effing ridiculously
obvious, but this woman has no idea about
that. And here's what she has to say
about trusting the science even though it's sometimes
wrong. Right? Think about how stupid these people
sound. My point is this is how they
make it look like,
you know, the false paradigm dynamic.
Right? To pretend like the democrats don't want
him. I'm on the mind that I mean,
I still argue that I think what's most
logical is that they don't let him in.
So they can act like they wanted that.
It's always the one stop. But who knows
how this goes forward? I think he's too
much of a liability for a lot of
different things that Trump's team supports.
But he still very well could make it
because I think it would be a big
benefit to claim they did that for Trump's
direction. But either way, this is what what
she's trying to say. And these are the
people that are supposed to be pushing back
on Kennedy. Like, there's plenty of things you
could call out if you really did wanna
go after Kennedy, but they don't bring it
up, which shows me this is a false
paradigm. Or the idea that none of them
are gonna bring up obvious issues around foreign
policy, but that's not what they're really gonna
talk about because it's all about the health
dynamic. But here's what she said. Because sometimes
science is wrong. We make progress.
We build
on the work,
and we become more successful.
And when you continue to sow doubt about
settled science,
it makes it impossible for us to move
forward.
I mean, think about how embarrassing that is.
Because
There.
I don't know what's going on with this.
That is strange.
I can't get this That's so frustrating.
Oh, well.
Something's going on with StreamYard, guys. I don't
know what's going on with this. I don't
know if you can see me right now
on the screen. Let me know if you
can see me on the screen.
I don't think you can.
That's so frustrating.
Always give me trouble.
Anyway,
let me know if you guys still hear
me, by the way, just in case.
What I was gonna say, when you see
me down there,
is that we're really gonna sit there and
pretend that science can be wrong, but that
when you doubt it, you're hurting us.
I mean, does she does she even hear
how stupid she sounds? I mean, that's what's
so crazy about it. Because she's been trained
like a dog to blindly trust the sign,
but then you better keep me wrong, though.
So then why would we trust it? Because
you're what you're basically saying is listen to
your betters. Even when they're wrong, they know
more than you, so shut up and follow
the lead. That's not what intelligence is. These
people are pretending to be they're they're they're
false everything in my opinion. I don't even
know if they know that, to be quite
honest.
This is driving me crazy.
Thanks, Streamyard. Okay. Sorry. I just yelled the
microphone. So let's keep going.
Here is a clip from
Rand Paul.
I'll probably play the whole thing. It's it's
about 6 minutes. The point is it's interesting.
I'll make I'll stop and make some comments
about this. I don't know how I feel
about Rand Paul on this.
Quite frankly, I'm really concerned about this kind
of, like, this
false binary or whatever you wanna call it.
Like, we're in a situation right now with
where he what he's laying out.
In my opinion, sets up the Trump administration
to roll out their mRNA platform because it's
done right now. Right? Because this is the
wrong way they did it. Now we're doing
it the right way. That's what I get
the sense of. And even Rand Paul gushes
about the vaccines being the most important thing.
I mean, you I don't know what your
opinions are out there. I think we're at
a point where it's so transparently clear that
we can't trust any of these people
in any aspect of this field. Doesn't that
maybe at one point it was. Maybe at
one point it can be. My point is
I don't know how we pretend we can
go forward
with the same institutions and the same people
who just did to did to us. I
mean, Trump is still promoting it and is
rolling out an mRNA cancer shot. How can
we pretend like we can just keep going
forward? That's what the CIA is saying, the
lab leak thing. They're trying to package this
so they can keep pushing. Here's what Rand
Paul had to say,
And this is in regard to RFK junior.
Discussion over
vaccines
is so oversimplified
and dumbed down that we never really get
to real truths. And it's why people up
here are so separated from real people at
home. By the way, exactly the same thing
comes to mind when we're talking about Israel
and Zionism. Right? It's the same thing. We
can't have an honest conversation for the same
reasons in a different conversation. So think about
that.
So we talk about hepatitis b. It's a
terrible disease. It could lead to liver failure,
as the chairman said.
But the reason you have distrust from people
at home, why they don't believe anything you
say, they don't believe government at all, is
you're telling your my kid to take a
hepatitis b vaccine when he's one day old.
You get it through drug use and sexually
transmitted. That's how you get hepatitis b.
But you're telling me my kid has to
take it at one day old. You're not.
That's not science.
And so every person with a bit of
common sense, even people who don't resist vaccines
I vaccinated all my kids. I believe vaccines
are one of the modern miracles beyond all
pale. The Speckled Monster is a great book
about the introduction of the smallpox vaccine in
17/20
into our country. All miracle. I recommend you
look into that for yourself and understand a
lot of the lies that have been told
around all of this leading to this very
day.
But I'm not a one size fits all.
It's not all or nothing. I chose to
wait on my hepatitis b vaccine, and we
did it when they went to school. Does
that make me an awful person? Does that
make me an anti vaxxer because I questioned
the government dictate of whether I do it?
And I'm not speaking for anybody else. I'm
only speaking for myself. But for goodness sakes,
let's have an honest debate about these things.
We can't, though, because this is the way
it's set up. Now this look. I don't
know where he's coming from. It may well
be this is him trying to call it
out honestly. But I get the I get
the uncomfortable sense this is him trying to
give you the illusion of that process.
I know I'm super jaded, guys. Please don't
just I I'm just my opinion. But just
realize that what he's doing
doesn't feel real to me. Like, in the
context that it as he continues to lay
this out. Right? The idea is
that we we the reason we can't have
an honest conversation about this is because nobody
in this room cares about the facts, including
him, apparently, as he goes on to pretend
these shots can help people. They cannot. These
shots are deadly dynamic. They're I mean, guys,
the science,
the very science they tell you to look
at is currently
overwhelmingly
showing that these shots are killing people,
overwhelmed with side effects that, by the way,
you can still go back and find every
one of them listed in the original Pfizer
documentation.
They knew it.
We all know this now. The DNA contamination,
the the extra substances, the myocarditis,
the blood clots, the thrombosis, the thrombocytopenia.
I mean, my god. Every single one of
them. The the
Alzheimer's overlaps, the the Prion's disease, every single
peer reviewed science across the board or the
UK owned statistics that were showing you that
more people were getting sick that took the
shot because your immune system collapsed. I could
go on forever.
You think he doesn't know all of that?
Let's not play the game where you think
he's kind of, you know, like an RFK
point where he's half walking into it so
you think he's on your side. Guys, he
has wrongly continued to tell you that he
still supports these.
There's some people in some circumstance. Nope. That's
a half measure. That's not true. Let's not
pretend like it's a positive thing because it
gives you halfway there. That's how they play
you. We know these things are killing people.
We know Trump and the rest of them
are still supporting it. End of story.
The COVID vaccine.
If you ask me my opinion, the reporters
run up and down the side, and they
say, you still anti vaccine?
No. I'm pro vaccine. But on the COVID
vaccine
and on the COVID illness, there was a
1,000 fold or more difference between the elderly
and children. If you don't acknowledge that, you're
committing malpractice. You're showing your ignorance.
Or you, by not acknowledging the fact that
the the ionitis group and many other overlapping
studies since, have proven that COVID 19, if
it was even there to begin with, was
less than the flu from the very beginning
for over 90% of the population.
That's according to their statistics. So then you
can combine that with the reality that the
shots themselves were actually dramatically,
like, 0.08%
in regard to whatever you claim is effective.
And on top of that caused, I mean,
straight up, the benefits were not worth the
risk. The risks were shockingly over the top
if there was any benefits at all. This
is the current reality of the science. I
I'm not just claiming this is my this
is what we've gone through on the show.
I've gone 1 by 1 from Nature to
be British Medical Journal showing you this.
Day after day after day, you think he
doesn't know this information?
So when you walk this halfway through, I
think we're setting ourselves up to fail. I
think it's about where this is going. They're
not stopping the agenda the the agenda. They
need you to pretend it was a partial
mistake. Right? That it's only bad here or
there, but this can still work. Look. I'm
not gonna say we should deny that. I
don't my point is that we are in
a position where they're and to be clear,
in the case of mRNA, I am saying
that. But I'm talking about the broad vaccination
conversation.
I just think what they're doing was the
point they made to begin with.
We're at a place where these are the
same people and the same groups and the
same objectives that have they're still there.
Every one of them. So if we're gonna
pretend we can just say the right thing
and move forward, these are dishonest criminals. How
does that make sense?
If you say a 6 month old must
be mandated to get it, the science is
not there. So I'll just blather about the
science says this and the science says that.
No. It doesn't.
The science actually shows that no healthy child
in America died from COVID.
Look it up. No healthy child died from
COVID.
And so the thing is is that it's
a 1,000 fold greater. So if you ask
me my advice as a physician, if you
were 65 or older or overweight and some
other conditions, I would have said, hell, yes.
I'd take the COVID vaccine. The risks of
the disease were real and much greater than
the vaccine, but nope.
That is objectively proven by peer prereviewed science
to not be the case.
He we'll still we'll get pushed back till
the end of days. Right? Just like with
the conversation of, you know, Zionism and Israel,
although because that is that is their chosen
gospel. In this conversation, he's wrong.
You all know he's wrong, and yet we
still walk through this like they're gonna guide
us. And it's it is because of the
people that are tapped into the same mainstream
political structure.
They just somehow convinced many of you that
you're fighting as some kind of rebel force
to get to the deep state. You are
inside the system, and this is the system,
and they're telling you we're gonna go forward.
I hope you can stop that. I hope
you can recognize that's where it's going and
choose to stand up and stand for what
you believe in, that you said you believed
in. If you ask me, should my healthy
6 month old get it?
See, these are the nuances you're unwilling to
talk about because there's such a belief in
submission. Submit to the government. Do what you're
told. Yeah. There is no discussion. There ought
to be a debate. You're not gonna let
him have the debate because you're just gonna
criticize and say, it is this and admit
to it or we're not going to appoint
you. But it's more complicated than that. And
this is why people distrust government because you're
unwilling to have these conversations.
And I go home. Ask your Democrat young
mothers, your Republican young mothers if they're vaccinating
their kid for hepatitis b, and they're like,
well, do I have to do it on
day 1 as this precious
little baby? Is there science to say you
shouldn't do it? Probably not, but it's my
kid.
You know? It's like, I there isn't clear
cut science saying not to. But on autism,
there's no good science of anything to show
what causes autism. We don't know. I disagree
with both those statements, by the way, and
I think there's a very, very clear science
that shows there without question, there is an
a connection. Now whether you can prove that
like like, there like, there's obvious overlaps of
things. Right? Like, we talk about, like, correlations.
My point is you can show and they've
been forced to admit it, that there is
a link between them. I think there's also
been very clear studies that have shown that
it causes it, but that's, oh, that's where
we get into the debate in, you know,
contentious point, the same way we try to
argue about the religious aspects. You know, you
get it. It's the same point everywhere. You
can literally prove these things are killing people,
but people will defend it till the day
they die because they force their child to
take it because Trump said. The reality is
though that everyone in this room is already
aware of the information that even RFK has
put forward. There is a connection. Look at
look at the facts documentary. Look at look
at,
I just forgot his name again.
Doctor Brian Hook and his ongoing research around
that, both with the injections causing all sorts
of things, but specifically, that's where this origin
point comes from in that conversation, that documentary.
They know it, guys.
It's a profound disease. I know many moms
here and dads who have kids with autism.
I know them personally. I've met their kids.
But the thing is is they saw their
kids developing
completely normal. Maybe speaking a 100 words go
to no words at about 15 months of
age. Now there isn't proof. There isn't proof
that the vaccines cause it. That that's true.
There isn't proof that it cause it, but
we don't know what causes it yet. So
shouldn't we be at least open minded? We
take 72 vaccines.
Think about crazy that is. And, yes, we
should. That's obvious logic just like it was
during the COVID 19 point when they go,
well, we don't know. It could be more
dangerous. So take the no. No. No. You
don't know. That means we don't know. Like,
they keep they play this game all the
time where it's, well, we know this is
safe, so just in case. Well, we don't
know that, and the evidence shows that it's
not. That's the claim they made about all
these shots.
Take this because there's no problem. You know?
But you have a point 0 0 0
1% risk of maybe getting the thing that
then won't even kill you. But take the
thing because we know it's safe, but it
wasn't, and we knew it.
Same thing here in every other conversation, guys,
because politics
and lobbyists
run this country.
Could it be? I don't know. But we
shouldn't just close the door and say we're
no longer because we believe so much in
submission. We're not gonna have an open mind
to study these things. And so it it's
sort of this crazy notion. Schizophrenia, I would
put in the same notion. You have a
kid who's completely normal to 18 or 19,
and their brain goes haywire. How does that
happen? It's the most bizarre disease.
Because of because of social media, because of
glyphosate, because of dioxins and PFAS, and god
knows what else is being pumped into you
day in, day out, all the time that
are absolutely having effects on your your your
chemical makeup.
Right? I mean, your whether like, even like,
realize that specifically social media has such a
profound effect on your dopamine, on your oxytocin.
Like, the idea is that you are being
tricked. Your body's being tricked into thinking you're
having emotional connection, and that's why you get
connected to these things, addicted to these things.
It ruins you. Same with pornography. These things
are ruining you. It's worse than
spending time to find out where these things
tie back to. Shouldn't we be open? Could
it be our food? It might be vaccines.
It might be our food, but autism's more
common. I don't know about the schizophrenia statistics,
but autism's more common. Shouldn't we wanna be
open minded? Instead, we're so close minded and
we're so consensus driven that the science says
this. Well, science doesn't say anything. Science is
a dispute, and 10 years from now, we
could all be wrong.
That's why but even the term settled science
is simply ignorance. Any actual scientist would have
laughed at that. That's why it's so alarming
to see how many went along with it
during COVID 19, which shows you how much
of it is bought off, paid for, controlled
science.
Which even people like Asim Malhotra made that
clear in the beginning of this when he
really started stepping into the scene and was
talking about even the statins. He's like, look,
guys. Our own body of evidence proves these
things are deadly, and we still use them
because politics.
Same thing to this day, by the way,
or any number of other things or the
COVID shot, for example. We were told in
the beginning, 20 years ago, they did this
enormous study, and they said, everybody over 50
should take an aspirin. I thought, well, that's
a pretty good idea. It makes sense. But
you know what? 20 years later, they measured
it, and they found if you had no
heart disease and you were taking aspirin, your
chance of dying from a brain bleed or
from a stomach bleed were greater than the
risk of heart disease. Jeff So they put
you at risk is the point. Proud because
they wanted to sell aspirin. Heart disease, they
still say take an aspirin. If you don't,
they've changed your mind 20 years later. But
would you have all said I was crazy
and I should no longer be in public
discourse if I had said 20 years ago?
I don't feel like taking an aspirin. I'm
I ride my bike all the time. I'm
afraid it might hit my head. But that's
what country's about. It's what dissent is about.
So just ask you to look at the
larger picture and give the guy a break
who says, I just wanna follow the science
where it leads without presupposition.
I think really what we have up here
is presupposition. You've already concluded. It's absolute that
autism isn't caused by it. We don't know
what causes autism, so we should be more
humble in what we say.
Sorry. I didn't get to a question.
And just to wrap it up quickly, the
guy comes on and tries to make an
excuse for why hepatitis b should be given,
and he makes the argument that it's just
in case. Like, literally because we don't know.
The mother could have it, and then they
might have a bigger risk. So give them
the shot because we don't know. That's actually
his argument. Rand Paul pushes back a little
bit. But that's the game. Right?
The argument is inherently embedded in the idea
that these shots are harmless, therefore,
and that's not
true. None of them,
even remotely harmless.
Some of them are far less dangerous than
the others, but the reality is clear that
all is is well, just in case,
he has a 1.01%
chance, and we don't know that you know?
So give him the shot to be safe
when he's 1 year old even though it
only gets translated through transmitted through drugs and
sex.
That is disgusting profiteering for the government that
are gaining risk. Like, then we wonder why
they get autism and and and all sorts
of mental issues and whatever else when you're
giving him 70 different shot. I mean, it
it makes me sick, and they never test
these alongside each other.
That is real, and we nobody think about
how crazy it is to put these things
in your body simultaneously, and they've never tested
them alongside each other.
Everything about this is broken.
But here is Raubler Rauser saying, she
Pierce Morgan says, he admits he was wrong
about the shots. Oh my god. Bombshell.
Raubler Rauser says just in time. Right? He's
Johnny come latelies. And by the way, I
consider Tucker in that group too.
Where I was completely wrong
was you mentioned COVID,
and it was interesting.
I've re it really changed my thinking about
these things. In COVID, I got very,
I think, overly emotionally engaged,
because I knew people who were dying of
COVID. And I Isn't that what we told
you? Now, frankly, who knows whether they were
just lying because they were told to or
not. But think about how crazy it is
to be shouted down so aggressively for peep
people like myself. We lost $6,000. PayPal shot
just pushed us off the platform. Patreon censored
us. We lost 10 like, 1,000 of dollars
in in regular funding.
I've lost so much money in this conversation.
They've they've boxed me out of every platform.
We're still to this very day having to
take 4 step 4 you know, 2 steps
forward, 1 step back, everything we do. And
he thought, well, we we were rushed a
little bit, and we we were emotional. And
turns out we got the gun because I
trusted the CDC, they were wrong. Yeah. That's
exactly what we were saying. And think about
in the moment simply going, well, we shouldn't
just blindly trust them, and they were going,
you're a crazy conspiracy theorist. Guys, there's no
these are the people that are trying to
buff up their personal position
now
when all they were doing was towing the
line. That's what they did.
Piers Morgan is one of the most disgustingly
low bottom of the barrel opportunist fair weather
journalists out there, in my opinion. He's been
shamelessly trying to line up with the Trump
administration now. The guy is a manipulator. And
and and even the Gaza conversation, he was
just a plainly
he was trying to act like he was
in the middle of it where he was
very clearly shilling for one thing.
And right now, he's just trying to get
you to gain your interest. But see, that's
all Unity team now. We're all on the
same side. Right? Isn't that what they want
you to think? Might as well have Pierce
Morgan on there, right next to Jeff Bezos
and Zuckerberg and Peter Thiel, and now all
the rest of them. Right? Because we're all
in Team Unity now. It's awful. And in
Britain, we handled it very badly.
Yeah. But I got led down a line
which I wish I hadn't been led down.
I'll give an example.
When the scientists said you you if you
have the vaccine, you can't transmit the virus.
I believe them. Yeah. Yeah. We know that
because you're a mindless follower. And I became
wrongly censorious.
Really Oh, yeah. Because you were you wanted
people to be censored because we didn't agree
with what you screamed the fact was, even
though we were proving you were wrong. Just
so you understand how this really went, for
those that maybe new to the conversation. And
we got sir censored. We got affected. We
got money taken. We've got never got any
of that back. This guy only grew and
still gets grown. How does that make sense?
Because this is a controlled media ecosphere. And
they want certain people to gain, including Tucker,
including the people that you see push in
front of you. Badly sensories. I was saying
to people, if you don't have it now,
knowing that if you have it, you can't
transmit the virus, you're gonna go and kill
old people. You're gonna kill people. It's not
about you. It's about the people you may
infect and kill.
And it turned out to be completely wrong.
Oh, yeah. Well, shocker. It turned out to
be wrong. So people like us that were
proving that with science and and their own
documentation,
did you even look at it? Did you
even care?
You get the point. Later said, months months
later, actually, there's no difference whether you have
the vaccine not in terms of transmitting the
virus. Oh, yeah. Months months later. You mean,
like, a year later. In fact, still to
this day, people push back on that same
point because morons like you shouted them down
when we were proving that.
And at that point, I realized I've been
misled completely. The
only reason you could be misled is because
you didn't do your due diligence. You got
misled because you trusted who you were told
to trust. Journalists
don't trust.
Journalists
research,
come to their own conclusions based on facts.
So you're not a journalist.
Gotten the vaccine? Yeah. Did you know that
it made you impotent when you got it?
I'd heard that. Is that not That's not
true. True. I can't confirm that's not true.
Funny.
Kinda joking. No. Not at all. In fact,
very much has a direct correlation with reproductivity,
fertility. But let's laugh it off because we're
kinda joking. These people are not on your
side.
I mean, it just it makes me sick
that people are pushing this down your throat
when all they can do is normalize
the reality.
You don't laugh at what you what you
just that's real. There's multiple peer reviewed studies
that have very clearly shown by the book
guys, the Pfizer documentation from the very first
trial showed you an almost 10% reduction in
the pregnancy index. Those that watch this show
already know that.
But let's laugh it off because we're making
fun of Piers Morgan because he get he
made himself impotent.
The way you just watch that would make
people think that's not real.
It is real. Here's my point. Here's my
point. Such a dick. I can't control myself.
No. I but that's why I like you.
They probably get on so well. The,
Yeah. Yeah. Good friends, these 2. Good guys.
Right?
Clearly not colluding to keep you under, you
know, uninformed
in just the right ways.
Here is Tedros
coming out and saying government of Uganda has
announced an outbreak in the Sudan.
You know, the same Sudan the US and
Israel have been dancing around in for a
long time now.
Shouldn't be ignored. Could just be an overlap.
Point is, in the Sudan,
Ebola virus has now had a breakout. Tragically,
a 32 year old nurse has died. He
says a full scale response is being initiated
by governments and partners. The WHO
is supporting the government through our country office
and our emergency program. We have made an
initial allocation of $1,000,000.
So as you as I keep saying, don't
do their job for them.
For for all I mean, I wouldn't even
trust the reporting. Who knows?
But just because they're saying something happens, let's
wait and see. Don't jump the gun and
start making a story. Like, who knows? I
think they want you to take the bait
and jump into these stories personally.
Either way, I get the sense if I'm
just gonna try to look into the future,
give you my opinion. I think what we're
talking about here is this is an effort
to point to the WHO that Trump
pulled out of, you know, how whatever the
reality of this we'll see as we go
into the next so many months, into the
next year.
The point, though, is that if this becomes
a story
where suddenly this is necessary because this growing
problem and as Trump floated already 2 days
later, well, we might go back to WHO
if they change the price. That's what he
said.
It'll get brushed off and people that wanna
pretend he'd never do that until he does,
then you rationalize why it needs to happen
as always. The point though is that I
think that's I I get the sense that's
what this will be. Just a prediction. The
idea that potentially this will be used to
rationalize why he has to, and he'll just
he's fine changing from the inside, you know,
whatever the jet rational becomes. But just keep
an eye out because I think the timing
of that's interesting.
Michael Tracy says in regard to the couple
points on the confirmation points, Tulsi Gabbard now
says she agrees with Trump drone assassinating Soleimani.
Yeah. That's real, guys.
So she is retrospectively agreeing with an act
that she previously denounced as illegal and unconstitutional.
That's called integrity in principles. Right? No. It's
called the opposite. That's called being a hypocrite.
What he did was illegal. There's no way
around it. You lulled this person into a
under a guise of diplomacy and then murdered
him in an international airport.
That's what happened.
I saw and and Soleimani, even if you
pretend that's okay, was not the terrorist they
pretend he is, Not even remotely. And it's
one of the most easy things to prove
in this conversation. He was the one actually
fighting ISIS in a lot of respects. And
remember they the narrative they give you about
how he fought Americans was when they were
illegally dating Syria and he's fighting back the
illegal invasion. What a terrorist.
I mean, guys, it's insulting. But the worst
part is Gabbard pretending she cares about these
things. Or at the very least, maybe she
does, and she's still changing sides.
That's disgusting.
So now you're okay with it. So I
guess not not anti war anymore. Here's another
example. Tulsi Gabbard, Kevork Elmason points out, reminds
everyone during the senate confirmation hearing of Jake
Sullivan's 2012 email to Hillary Clinton. And this
is how they use the truth, even, you
know, usually something that they know we've all
talked about for decades,
but never really broke through the corporate conversation,
and they use it. Right? Like him talking
about the Nord Stream pipeline. They know we
all know these things already. And it is
the email that Hillary Clinton wrote that says
Al Qaeda is on our side in Syria.
Yeah. Yeah. We know that. Maybe new people
didn't know that though, but here's why that's
frustrating.
13 years later, Hayat al Sham
runs Damascus.
Now why if you're not connecting the dots
still,
the administration that she's currently a part of
openly supports them.
Israel and Trump's administration are currently supporting the
Syrian regime in Israel
or in in occupied Syria, which is now
part of Israel.
So how does that make sense? If you're
gonna make a big statement about how the
Democrat bad side was working with Al Qaeda,
and the reality is that all of you
are because our government is active actively working
with Israel's government to run these entities or
influence them,
and now you're supporting Syria, then all you're
doing is feigning resistance when in reality, you're
working with
them. Now now the the the psychological operation
background for her is really starting to show
through in my opinion.
Now, on the ask last part of this,
I wanna point out the financial ethics overlap
again. Now, as we talked about on 15th,
the Trump admin's missing ethics pledges.
This still matters. It still blows me away
how so few have talked about this. Now
this is the follow-up on I I looked
this up on, yesterday.
Donald Trump has indeed taken steps regarding ethics
rules, but it appears he has revoked
existing ones rather than signing new agreements. Right.
So the evolution of the conversation has been
what? I've continued to show you. They haven't
signed them. Many of the people there are
already confirming, by the way, which only way
that makes sense is that there's not really
a fight. These people have been tapped by
something that goes above congress, and they're being
put in position. Otherwise, why would Republicans or
Democrats not call out the fact that they
have not gone through the legally binding steps.
Sure. I wish people would ask that question.
My point
is that Trump hadn't on top of that.
And right on as of January 23rd, I
think last time was it was that the
date on this?
Well, 23rd was last time I checked it,
and I I was it's as of January
23rd, because, actually, we I think we did
a show after this one where we talked
about it,
where it said he had not signed these.
Okay. Now it's evolved again, and I think
all this is about a a shell game.
It's about trying to present it in something
that makes it look as if something has
happened. So now what he's done is actually
revoked existing ones
as if that makes it all okay instead
of signing new ones.
And this is what we're talking about. This
was covered as of 22nd.
Trump has canceled Biden's ethic rules.
Ethics rules. Critics call it opposite of burying
the swamp.
Now, again, the same way this game plays
is if it's Biden's thing, that must be
bad. Well, that's a stupid way to look
at the world because you have no idea
what it is.
Just because Biden's thing doesn't make it it
these are just things that are the point
is that if you look at it, it
turns out to be something that gives him
leeway and not accountability. Well, then maybe you
should realize that's him just giving himself the
ability to not be held accountable.
But he'll know you'll jump on it and
go Biden bad, so this good. Because that's
as simple as it gets these days.
This
is from CNN. The gloves are off. Trump
appears poised to cash in from his presidency
in new ways.
Now, again, of course, same thing, CNN. So
it's not it it's not about the platform.
This is being covered by a lot of
different corporate things. And, yes, you should aggressively
question all of them, including independent media, especially
mainstream alternative media. But it says during his
first four years in office, Trump team play
paid lip service to ethics guy guardrails.
And, this was,
this week sued the Trump administration over a
separate issue. This group,
the liberal group, public citizen, claiming that Trump's
so called department of government efficiency is operating
in violation of a federal transparency law that
governs advisory panels.
And it says on his 1st day in
office, Trump actually rescinded Biden's executive order requiring
high level employees to make several ethics pledges.
So look. How do you why would that
be something that you think is a bad
thing? Making somebody sign even though I don't
believe they care about them, at the very
least, it's feigning towards caring about ethics, but
now you just remove that, which to me
only signals one thing, even if Biden's or
not. And it's not Biden's. It's just it's
just from that administration, which is about your
government. But it says the Biden policy included
a ban, get this,
on accepting lobbyist gifts while working for the
government.
Well, what do you know? And a 2
year prohibition
on lobbying executive branch employees after leaving a
government job or until the end of administration.
So now they don't have to do that.
Now they they are profiteering
everywhere right now. It says, as of Wednesday
afternoon, Trump has not yet issued his own
voluntary ethics policy for the executive branch.
I don't think this ever even came close
to happening.
So here we are where they're literally showing
you that they're removing things that they did,
and they they know this team is gonna
yell it's good because Biden, when in reality,
what they just did is allowed them to
accept gifts from foreign governments.
Because that's not a big deal. Right?
Here, MSNBC highlights another way this is happening.
This is Trump's new meme coins have MAGA,
crypto bros, up in arms.
Just the main quick one quick part here.
We talked about this already. Cryptocurrency enthusiasts are
not happy about Donald and Melania's
new meme coins. You know what that means?
It means it has no background. It's it's
just an idea. It's Trump on a piece
of on a a digital coin. Alright? There's
no it's not a some
kind of technology. It's only valuable just like
fiat currency, by the way, because you decide
to buy it, and the price goes up.
And then they can drop it out underneath
you and sell out. And, you know, that's
why all these things tend to work. But
it says,
essentially, glorified trading cards.
So digital things, guys. That's what we're dealing
with. The same digital direction that you all
thought you were fighting. But it says the
digital tokens seem like a perfect vessel for
anyone,
including foreign governments, to funnel money to the
Trump family.
Now whether or not you think, oh, MSNBC,
it's again, if that is as easy as
to play you, then you're probably not even
worth watching the show. The point is whoever's
reporting this, you know as well as I
that any crypto dynamic like this is I
mean, guys, that's a perfect medium for them
to take funding that they can just pretend
isn't even it's just people buying crypto. Right?
We're watching a money laundering operation just like
we saw with with with Biden. That's what
I believe.
Because you're there's no different, guys. This is
your government. This is how they operate. Why
do you think Biden or Hunter never got
in trouble?
I know it's all because they wrote there's
always an excuse. As I always talk about,
it's the outcome.
There's narrative and narrative and narrative. Well, when
when's the last time Trump got in trouble?
Right? There's a lot of narrative. There's a
lot of name calling. There's a lot of
things. Well, we rule this and rule. What
happened? Did he go to jail? He's committed
a lot of crimes. So has Biden. So
has under. So has Bush. So has Obama.
What happened? Where's Clinton? She's in prison? Nope.
Didn't lock her up
because they're not fighting each other.
And now we have a very clear way
for them to literally funnel funds through a
foreign government that we can quite literally prove
is controlling this this administration. It says that's
one reason why some experts have said the
ventures launched within days of his inauguration
are ripe for blatant corruption.
Can you if Biden was doing it, they
would be screaming about this. It says and
even some of Trump's biggest fans are bemoaning
the move because
the people that he played at, like, the
Bitcoin conference, for example,
most of which don't believe in what he's
doing here. They believe in us as a
different kind of libertarian side. That's not what
this is. This is profiteering.
The Wall Street juror, especially when you're about
to be elected president,
inaugurated.
Like, that's supposed to be a conflict of
interest. Oh, but that's right, he never even
signed the ethics pledge, so I guess it
doesn't matter.
It says,
the Wall Street Journal published an article that
quotes Trump supporting crypto bros who are, I
hate that they use those terms, who are
worried that this move will delegitimize
the industry. On Monday,
the reverend, Lorenzo
Sewell,
the pastor who gave the benediction to Trump's
swearing in,
also announced that he had launched a meme
coin. My god. They're everyone's grifting, guys. Probably
not helping with that whole legitimacy thing. So
only point I wanna highlight here is that
foreign governments or anybody,
anything behind you, whether BlackRock or anybody, it
could be funneling funds right into his hands
that we can't see.
And then last point on this, if you
didn't see this, by the way, Elon Musk
remember the whole thing where they were giving
away $1,000,000
to people that signed up for this whole
voting dynamic?
Which we were all, well, that's pretty much
just buying votes just like you were calling
out for the Democrats, but it's good because
you do it. Right? So partisan
hypocrisy as always.
Well, turns out something was a lie.
Says
wasn't illegal, Elon Musk says, because they weren't
random.
Well, that's dishonest.
So the bottom line is he's being sued
because they're going, look, what you did was
basically giving the money away. You're bribing people.
Because, well, it wasn't illegal because we didn't
actually make it random. We were giving it
to specific people. Well, then you misled everybody
in the naga movement, which is what a
lot of people are now saying.
It says he was asked by a judge
to just he asked the judge to dismiss
it, arguing that his $1,000,000 daily giveaway to
voters in battleground states wasn't an illegal lottery
because the winners weren't actually chosen at random.
See, that's how this works when you get
like a Tucker or a Jones where they
argue in a court of law that they
can't be sued because they're not actually real,
that what they do is all entertainment,
and then we don't really take that seriously,
and we pretend like they were just trying
to sidestep. No, guys, that's what we're same
thing here. What they're what he's showing you
to get out of being legally accountable is
that he played you all. He lied to
you.
He says this is sharply different from what
people were led to believe
who had signed his petition pledging support.
Now what it says specifically, the suit pointed
to Musk's social media posts that literally said
that each would be chosen randomly. We remember
that was directly in his he lied about
it. Or that's what they did do, and
now he's lying about it now to get
out of being held legally accountable. So there's
only 1 2 ways to look at it.
He bribed people
to vote, and now he's lying about it
to not be held accountable for that, which
should matter, or he didn't. He lied to
it to begin with and was choosing individuals,
and he lied to all the MAGA people.
So he lied either way.
This person basically says,
he says, a second random drawing the next
day. What what did they say? It's right
here. Basically saying that they here. It says
they wanted them to represent the pack.
Yeah. It says that
Yes, it must lawyer say the participants weren't
actually entering a random drawing. They were submitting
their information to potentially become America PAC spokespeople.
Well that's what nobody thought that. In fact
there's people that are saying well that's not
fair what this is I I feel misled.
I it says, I never would have given
where is it? I'm trying to hurry.
Yeah. So it said this one says that
she never would have handed over her private
information, which we know what they're asking for.
It's like all the rest of this. World
coin, Twitter, Authentix. They're scooping up your personal
data. But she never would have given it
and signed the petition had she known that
there was not a real chance that she
would win this, that it wasn't a random
drawing, that they were selectively
using all of this to give it to
certain people. That's Guys, this is money. This
is money,
I mean, even I wouldn't call it money
laundering, but this is a dishonest act. What
they're doing is money changing hands in very
deceptive ways. There's probably a lot more going
on around this than we even realize.
So keeping this in mind
Damn it.
Man, that's so wild. There we go.
It's so weird. Anyway, so I found a
way around it. But, anyway,
coming into the next part of this. So
let's let's get into the kind of latter
half and ultimately talk about know, keeping what
we just went through in mind. Right? Even
the financial aspect, the ethics pledges, like, this
very much overlaps with where I think a
lot of this influence is coming from.
So this is the second part of this
we're gonna get into. Oh, wait. Is that
the same one? Oh, that's the wrong one.
Here we are.
Got too many windows open.
Okay. So here is we're gonna get into
we're going to get into the kind of
latter half of this.
And this is
starting with some points about Netanyahu that I
think and we played, I think, 2 of
these before.
Now the re well, basically, in case you're
just tuning in now, we're gonna I wanna
start with a couple of examples of what
I think is truly influencing what we're seeing.
It's not just Netanyahu, but that's the that's
the the the leader of the current dynamic
for the most part. But we're gonna get
into this. We're gonna get into a conversation
about the ceasefire and what's happened thus far,
and the so and and the firing on
Palestinian people that are being released, the scooping
back up people that are being released, just
like every time before it. The comparison between
the people that are being leased on the
other side, the idea that Israel tried to
pause the whole thing under a guise that
they were at risk. I think there's a
lot of things that are flying around this.
At the moment, unless it's changed, let me
know in the chat, it seems to it
that it has gone back on and they're
still moving forward. But what's so insulting about
the whole thing is that everybody knows, including
Palestinians, that Israel's been been killing innocent people
throughout Palestine the entire time.
The entire time from day 1 till right
now, they've been violating the ceasefire in every
possible way. Including, by the way, the weird
pause they just did, was also a ceasefire
violation.
Had any of this happened or even Hamas
had responded in a way, they would have
used it to already break it, I promise
you. Which by the way, I argue they're
still going to. Because they already have the
agreement that I think was publicly acknowledged between
Trump that they've got they were allowed to
break the deal in the second phase, which
we're not there yet.
Before we get into all that.
And other information that is important around
the anti Semitism executive order,
Netanyahu has been maliciously influencing the US government
for decades, all while pushing for Americans to
die for Zionist agendas.
None of these wars have been in the
interest of Americans.
If you take away the Soviet Union and
its chief proxy, the PLO,
international terrorism would collapse. If you take out
Saddam,
Saddam's regime, I guarantee
you that it will have enormous positive reverberations
on the region. Obviously, we'd like to see
a regime change, at least I would, in
Iran, just as I would like to see
in Iraq. The question now is a practical
question.
What is the best place to proceed? It's
not a question of whether Iraq's regime should
be taken out, but when should it be
taken out? It's not a question of whether
you'd like to see a regime change in
Iran, but how do it Are there any
other nations that you would recommend that the
United States launch preemptive attacks upon at this
point?
The answer is categorically yes. The,
the 2 nations that are vying, competing with
each other, who will be the first to
achieve nuclear weapons,
is Iraq and Iran. But, a third nation,
by the way, is Libya as well. Libya
is,
trying very rapidly to build
an atomic bomb capability. So you have here
now 3 all stand together to stop Iran's
march of conquest,
subjugation,
and terror. Wow.
All right.
And and more so because we can look
back and see this now. Right? The only
groups you've seen continue are them. No matter
on which side of the aisle you sit,
you stand with Israel.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
No different today.
In fact, I think it's far worse.
Khaleesi shared this. This is Netanyahu's own definition
of terrorism. We just played this one recently.
Compare this to what's going on right now.
What terrorists do
is target the innocent deliberately.
Therefore, my definition of terrorism is the systematic
and deliberate attack in murder, naming, and menacing
of innocent civilians.
Her name is Hin Brejab, and she was
just 5 years old when she was killed
with her family trapped
terrorists, but what happens when they come to
power. They end up as being masked in
the terrorist space.
Here is a clip.
Interesting short clip,
which I've made this point for a while
now about peace through strength, which is not
an old it's not a new thing. It's
it's something that US entities have put forward
before.
But it also happens to be a very
classic mantra from one specific person who you
might not be surprised to hear. And how,
weirdly, we've seen this very clear alignment between
the current Trump administration and Netanyahu's direction.
I think it's worth pointing out this overlap.
Not just peace through strength, which means war,
by the way, which there's no historical you
look back through history and you tell me
where war has led to less war. Like,
in the context, you could argue that the
end of some kind of warfare dynamic would
lead to the nobody being able to fight
back.
But it's not the same thing as peace.
And the concept in general showing you that
that's usually not how this works. That eventually
people will then fight back because they're fighting
back for what's theirs and what's been taken.
Now, maybe that's the only way the world
works. You guys can decide for yourselves. I'm
of the mind that we can strike a
different path in the future.
Violence begets violence, and people like this know
that.
It's about total victory,
which is exactly what they said what Gaza
is right now.
That's what their goal was.
Peace, true, strength.
Right?
We don't have to fight the wars if
we can do it
without fighting.
As long as we have total victory, with
total victory.
Total victory over Hamas can bring us additional
gifts of peace.
Our doctrine of peace through strength,
Hamas is the obstacle blocking a better and
more peaceful Middle East and it's strengthening Israel's
security.
The pressure of the world should be on
destroying Hamas as quickly as possible
and not on preventing Israel from doing so.
All those who yearn for peace should support
our quest for total victory. Total victory for
our security,
total victory for peace in the region,
total victory to secure
our common future.
How's that working out? Gaza's flat. It's gone.
They destroyed it all.
So are they pretending it's all done? Like,
are we gonna pretend that they destroyed all
of Hamas, that it'll be over? What about
the Palestinian Islamic Jihad? There's there's 3 times
as many of them in Gaza.
See, they don't talk about this stuff, or
about Lebanon or Syria. I mean, they they
would net this their lives are transparent.
What they want what total victory would have
achieved is one more step in their total
domination, which is exactly what they pretend everybody
else is doing while they literally show you
they're doing it.
In Lebanon, in Syria, in Egypt, in Gaza,
or the US government, all around the world.
They're the groups that are are conquering and
taking and conquering and taking, but the Iran's
gonna do it. They're secretly, wink wink, you
can't see them. They're all back there. Maybe.
Sure. Why not? Still don't see it, still
don't have the evidence. What we can prove
is that what you're doing is obviously more
than anybody else you're even pretending.
Here is Benjamin
Netanyahu today, or rather 26, recently saying, thank
you, Donald Trump, for keeping your promise to
give Israel the tools it needs to defend
itself. This is after he gave them the
very bombs that his very followers said would
not happen because he's not gonna support Israel.
But guess what? He stepped in and said,
remove all the restrictions from Biden. Give them
all the bombs they need to keep murdering
children,
which is what's happening.
I said, the most known war criminal on
the planet thanking Donald Trump for continuing to
support the genocide.
Just another day in the US empire.
Antiewar.com,
Netanyahu gonna meet with Trump at the White
House
next week.
Right? So the first foreign leader, just like
with
Rubio,
first person he couldn't wait to call was
Netanyahu.
I just don't know why we can't see
some people can't see how clear this is.
Now, you could you could pretend they're the
chief ally of the United States, and all
they want is the best for America. It
still shows you an overwhelmingly
obvious influence
on what these people think and do and
why. It's obvious.
And and nobody honest can stand back.
Like, you could argue that people want the
same things, but you're gonna pretend that just
in per forever,
for the rest of existence, they're always gonna
be on the same page. That never happens.
Eventually, something will want they'll have a different
opinion, and they'll be able to push and
make it happen on our side because of
the influence.
The reason they don't care about that is
because that's what they want.
That's what they're fighting for.
And over a very long period of time,
lobbying groups and other very weird, malicious, sexual
blackmail and all sorts of things that we
can prove, their Mossad, Epstein networks, and CIA,
and all the different things that even Acosta
or was it Acosta? Yeah. I think wait.
No. It wasn't Acosta, was it?
Guys, so all the names blend together.
Basically, you know, the US entities admitted that
they Epstein was working for both.
Intelligence.
This is how it works. The infiltration we
can see, the startups, the threatening, the blackmail
of antisemitism. It's all working to keep these
people in a very clear position where they're
acting definitively
against American interest while screaming America first.
And all people that don't see that, I
mean, the people that are screaming that this
is what we're fighting for are the ones
that I think know it's not happening.
You're smart enough. You know what you're seeing.
This person points out, Munther Isaac, that the
man who's has an arrest warrant for him
from the ICC
is invited to the White House in his
guest of honor. This is Donald Trump's document.
His excellency Benjamin Netanyahu.
I would like to formally invite you to
the White House. I look forward to discussing
how we could bring peace to Israel and
its neighbors, an effort to counter our shared
adversaries.
Yeah. Genocide support.
This guy is the no the most known
war criminal on the planet.
Every institution of any standing, it's all told
you this guy's committing genocide. You know why?
Because he's openly committed, openly praising the genocide.
Every one of them have said 15 different
statements that are on the record without question,
genocidal.
There is nobody innocent, the Amalek, all of
it. They know that. They're all supporting it.
And this is what your president just invited
for the very first person to come to
his office. Mike Pompeo, of course, because, you
know, he's a good superhero,
not totally in the deep state, says it's
great to once again have a White House
that treats our allies like friends and our
adversaries like enemies.
Well, maybe you should reflect on who your
enemies are and who your friends are. If
you're literally friends with the worst people on
the planet and you're fighting all the people
that are trying to stop them.
Pretty sure that makes you part of the
problem.
William,
Daryl points out the this is Max Hastings
overhearing the young Benjamin Netanyahu
dreaming of a war when, quote, if we
get it right, we'll have a chance to
get all the Arabs out. We can clear
the West Bank and sort out Jerusalem.
It says this is the plan of the
Israeli right for the new Nakba that Trump
has now endorsed.
History is rife with examples of them on
the record openly telling you exactly what they
pretend isn't real.
Now here's where you get the kind of
half measure. This is what kills me about
these things. Right? So
this I'm I'm not familiar with the guy
on this Tucker Carlson clip
talking about what's gonna come.
Right? So 2 things stand out to me
in this. As he outlines that Netanyahu is
going to break the deal, or he's gonna
go back into Gaza, one of the things
that we're all telling you because these people
are maniacs, that he is a criminal, that
his own people don't support him. Right? But
here's so 2 things stand out to me.
1 is crazy that this is about, you
know, release valving out some of the information
through a platform that is barely touching on
the genocide.
But at the same time, think of what
it shows you. If Tucker Carlson,
a right leaning platform
that's supported by the Trump circle, is openly
pointing to the things we're saying that that
group is then calling us racist for,
what does that show you? It shows you
that everybody knows what's going on. Everyone knows
Netanyahu's a war criminal. Everyone knows what's going
that they are
trying to make it appear to the right
that there's something deeper going on. See? Tucker
pointed to it. Save Israel for last, q
said, so ignore all this going on. That's
all my reading of it. But I think
it's crazy that Tucker could point this out
as if it's some passing point where the
guy discusses what they'll do to West Bank,
and Tucker acts like he has no idea
what he's talking about.
To me, this is all about playing you
to keep these things in this they want
you to let this continue while pretending there's
some secret long term plan. No. They're committing
genocide, guys. Trump and Biden and all the
rest of them who are continuing to allow
this, but this is the truth.
But I guess because he'll point to it
and then ignore it, apparently, we'll pretend like
we don't need to do anything else. No.
We need to stand up and call this
out.
Yahoo's situation is unstable. A super majority of
of Israelis want him out. He does not
wanna resign because if he resigns, he may
go to prison. And also, he's been a
power achiever for 30 years. And Yes. I've
noticed that people who do that often don't
like to quit. Pretty recognizable syndrome, I would
say. Yes. He's not confined to BB. It's
international. Yes. It is international. Okay. How does
he not quit? Spectacular
circumstances
justify
his presence. There are basically two options. 1,
once all the hostages are exchanged, then they
go back into Gaza. Or I guess 1
b is to do the West Bank, which
is already going on right now. What do
you mean do the West Bank?
Now, of course, you could argue that he's
just which I which I do all the
time, asking a question I know the answer
to to get a certain response. But let's
be clear. That's not something they get into
very often. Right? The illegal annexation of the
West Bank, which is a very, very, very,
very public and easily knowledgeable point. It's been
illegal. It always is illegal. The only small
deviation we ever saw was during Trump's last
administration with with Pompeo saying that it wasn't
inconsistent
with law. Yeah, it is though. It's illegal,
blatantly illegal. And then they roll that back.
So here we are at the point where
the world still acknowledges that taking the West
Bank in any way, shape, or form is
against the law, and right now Israel's openly
doing that. I mean, openly. They cut off
the electricity. We'll get to it. They are
straight up going in to take the West
Bank.
Do do the West Bank?
I don't believe, I think that he's playing
dumb because they don't want you to know
what's going on there. I don't think, if
he wanted to, he would talk about this.
It's been going on for 70 years, or,
you know,
occupation of Palestine has been going on for
over 76 years. And fade it and exit.
What about the people who live there? Not
Israel's problem. The problem is the US is
the military underwriter of this. The Israelis probably
can't do this without us selling them weapons.
And so Probably. No. That's absolutely easily proven.
While Americans are tuned out and not thinking
about this kind of thing, I'll rep And
why is that? Because people like Tucker are
pulling punches and not pointing to it. The
largest genocide we've ever seen, the most documented,
the most publicly, the most social media shared.
And and what did you say?
While Americans are tuned out and not thinking
about this How is that possible?
You know why. Kind of thing. Our reputation
overseas is one of arms dealer. Option 2
is Iran. I'll quote the the hard line
perspective. It's the head of the snake in
the conception Right. Of the Israeli hard line
and also the neoconservative right in the United
States. Yep.
Right.
So they'll put this clip out, of course,
because look, Tucker's back okay. Did you follow-up
on that? Are they gonna go after Iran?
Like, the point is that these people are
all actively in the same direction. They're supporting
the new Trump administration. They're supporting the technocratic
rollout, which all of that includes the globalist
Israeli elitist society
that is absolutely causing a genocide. They're well,
let's be clear. They're all collaborating in a
genocide.
I think things like that is it's almost
insulting.
They, you know, they they rattle the point.
We people have been saying what he said
for decades because it's easily proven and have
been called racist for it for decades up
until this very moment.
I'm glad it's being pointed to, but is
it gonna be followed up with more information,
or is it gonna be some way designed
to kind of saddle you in this one
half measure, which is called a limited hangout?
Well, funnel interestingly enough, I just thought this
was hilariously stupid. Bill Maher, of all people,
Bill Maher. You know, the guy, as he
as
antiwar.com
says right here,
guy who makes career off mocking religion
uses bible to justify ethnic cleansing.
I mean,
talk about being a hypocrite.
Bill Morris is the most one of the
most smug,
you know, know it all, which and usually
doesn't even know it all kind of person.
He did this whole thing about mocking religion
and God. Right? So he then makes this
case, and this is Vivid, a Zionist manipulator
saying, Bill Maher, Israel is the Jews' homeland,
And Jews have always lived there, he says.
You can look it up.
It's in this book called the Bible.
You mean the very Bible that you've laughed
off smugly that doesn't exist because religion is
for children?
So now you're making the argument that because
the Bible, you just you write it as
a false thing, proves that they've always lived
there, therefore, they're allowed to be there, so
ethic cleansing's okay.
This is the kind of moment that shows
you what these people are. That either means
that he believes everything he's ever said, but
somebody's paid him, influenced him, threatened him to
go against that right now, or he's always
been feigning things he didn't believe because he's
an opportunist profiteer.
Bottom line is you can't pretend that the
bible, which, by the way, regardless of your
religious beliefs, is still an old written document
or or, you know, book through humans.
Right? So there's all sorts of which I
can prove to you going back to all
sorts of discussions about which gospels were chosen
by man to be included and which were
not based on political reasons even all the
way back then. The bottom line is this
person pretends all of it stupid, but then
literally is willing to point to it to
justify why Israel,
the Zionist organization, is allowed to murder people
for their interests. Bill Maher, you're a disgusting
person, and you just made that more clear
than I've ever seen in my life.
Here is Tom Cotton showing you the same
damn thing.
This is more than just him showing you
that he's a feeble, childish kind of person
that will follow with whoever wake and feel
powerful.
What he's telling you here is I think
the pulling the mask off moment for what
these people are doing.
How long have they been telling you it's
about democracy?
It's about democracy and the freedom and and
rights and all that. Right? We only wanna
work with democracies. But we'll work with Israel,
which isn't a democracy. We'll work with Saudi
Arabia, which isn't openly authoritarian. But it's because
we won't even acknowledge that. We'll just pretend
like it makes sense and then pretend like
anybody that's even far more democratic than they
are is a problem because they don't like
us. The truth is they only go after
people that are not in their interests,
and they support people that support their interests.
They don't care how extreme they are. They
don't care how racist they are. They don't
care any of it.
That's the reality of this that's easily proven.
Tom Cotton is trying to tell you that.
In a fallen world, we have to take
our friends where we find them. First point.
Did you hear what he said?
In a fallen world
guys, I can't I mean, I I am
I've expressed a lot how how concerned I
am with all of this.
But if you can't I mean, you should
be unnerved
that a sitting member of congress
who is undeniably
being influenced by these prophetic extremist Zionist maniacs
who he proudly supports. He called himself a
Zionist when interviewing Hegseth.
He just said a fallen world.
Do you realize where that mindset is coming
from? They're of the mind that this is
a fallen world and that the Zionist mindset
is gonna take over be at the end
times, and that's about to happen. These people
are lunatics.
I don't care if you believe them or
not. We're talking about a religious perspective that's
guiding politic political policy.
Look at this person, guys. I mean, I
am terrified that people like this have any
level of power, even if I don't believe
they're truly the ones in power. There is
still power in this position.
In a fallen world,
we have to choose our allies carefully. Now
I'll let it play.
In a fallen world, we have to take
our friends
where we find them. Or whatever you said.
There you go. No question. Stable democracies make
the most stable friends. But what matters
in the end is less whether a country
is democratic
or nondemocratic,
and more whether the country is pro American
or anti American.
Got it. Got it. So because we're drifting
rapidly, if not long since been even close
to it, away from what we pretend we
are. Right?
Not a democratic representative government, a completely authoritarian
oligarchy that's being led by a Zionist manipulating
technocratic regime. But totally, we're democracy.
Right? The point is that we're so far
away from that now.
And what he's saying is, like, well, yeah,
democracy is you know, it's more about whether
they just do what we like and are
asking that they are in our interest.
Okay. Well, that's a pretty big statement because
what it shows you is that it only
matters if they if they are striving to
achieve what we are. And you like to
pretend that means because we're good, altruistic people,
but nobody believes that. Nobody. You don't believe
that. Your own history shows you that. Your
own tenure in this position proves that's not
the case.
So all they're showing you is the mask
off, guys. We only fight for the people
that make us powerful, who are aligned with
our interests, which means we'll do whatever we
want against anybody we want to get what
we want.
Everyone be damned including America.
That's who these people are.
And it's less whether a country is democratic
or nondemocratic,
and more whether the country is pro American
or anti American.
Government. Not you, but the government.
I'll confess that those views may be somewhat
unconventional,
but look at where conventional thinking has got
us.
Right. So because it's a fallen world. Right?
Of course.
These you can see the Zionist strings on
this guy. He's, like, puppeteering straight through the
idea that we need to rack
excuse me, radically, dramatically change
everything we are. Who does that benefit?
Are you of the mind that we have
a completely fallen society? I mean, the reality
is these people are ushering in the decline
for a very clear political interest, and he
wants you to believe that it's not about,
we're gonna work with whoever we can to
make us powerful.
Let let's be clear as well. Democracies are
not, I think, what we pretend they are
anyway.
But just to be very clear, guys, this
is a very dangerous thing, and they're beginning
to pull the mask off, and that's what
Trump does.
And this and this is just her, citing
this and then Glenn Greenwald saying the same
thing. Tom Cotton presiding over Tulsi's hearing, offering
a very candid description of US foreign policy
that's virtually never heard in Washington, but has
always been the reality, which I would agree
with.
Now, in the context of the ceasefire, this
is also the show where we covered this,
the new ceasefire agreement,
Israel already plans to break, which we covered
before the ceasefire even technically began.
Just showing you yet again,
which what I mean, this was my opinion
based on the facts at hand, but here
we are, and that was correct.
Day 1, already breaking the deal.
We also covered this and the follow-up on
the 21st January.
Israel has then repeatedly already violated the ceasefire,
which nobody in the corporate media, in the
West, politicians, nobody cared about that. Who cares
if they violate it because that they're on
our side. That's what he's telling you. We
don't care about the rules or human life.
They're our ally because we're in a fallen
world. Right?
Zionist, we're gonna Zionist. Right? That's how this
works.
They went full Zionist. Heretz covers an interesting
point on this. Now this is on the
30. This is this morning.
After 482
days, 3 Israelis,
5 Thai hostages or rather it says 3
Israeli, 5 Thai hostages released from Gaza captivity.
So it's just early in the morning. So
what's funny if you look into this more,
you'll find that the Israeli government was really
trying to pretend that these Thai hostages were
because of them.
Rent crap. This is what they do. They'll
they'll it's just like Trump and the rest
of them, lying about the the Gaza condoms,
lying about the drone thing, lying because they
just they're gonna take whatever lie they can
get, knowing that people will go along with
it because they're being paid to. In this
case, Israel pretending that we did this for
them, and we've succeeded because we're powerful, which
just shows you how weak they are. Right?
That's the that's how this works.
Turns out,
they weren't responsible for it. As Zachary Foster
highlights from the BBC, the release is part
of a separate agreement between Hamas and the
Thai government.
Oh, Oh, so you mean Hamas went out
of its way to get these people released
and it wasn't in the interest of fighting
Jews? I wonder why that make because they're
lying to you guys. Because Hamas has been
trying to get these people released from the
beginning. As it even turns out now, if
you've been following this show, that one of
the people they tried to release, the earliest
one,
I just said her interesting name. I forget
it now. What the very first person that
was released.
The only reason they were released because they
dropped her off. They tried to release her.
Israel declined,
and then they just dropped her off. They
pretended they rescue her, but they remember they
found her. That'd be that the story come
out came out. She just recently publicly admitted
that they'd refused her, that they didn't wanna
take her. They've been trying to kill these
hostages from the very beginning. If you can't
come to terms with that, you're just denying
the facts at this point.
His point is for years, the Israeli government
has invited tens of thousands of Thai nationals
to work in Israel.
That's how this works. Right? They use the
they the it's the this is like the
agricultural underclass of, like, the US government dynamic
where you've got the Hispanics working in the
field. The same thing for Israel. Right? They
use the Palestinians. They they they see it
as beneath them.
And it says, yet the Thai hostages released
today were not released as part of the
Israeli Hamas deal. That's because Israel did not
negotiate for their release because Israel did not
care. It says that's for 1 oh, I
added that to my opinion, but I think
it's clear. And that's for one reason and
one reason only, that Thai workers weren't Jewish.
Welcome to Israel where non Jews are considered
less human than Jews. If you support Israel's
so called right to be a Jewish state,
you are affirming an ideology that regards certain
humans as less human than other humans.
That's supremacy.
It's as simple as that. There's no way
around it, which again
is what even the Israeli leading human rights
group
claimed in 2021.
That is an apartheid state. A regime of
Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the
Mediterranean Sea. This is apartheid. That's the Israeli
human rights group.
Express News highlights
let further in on this on the 30th
still.
Then ultimately, what you began to see was
a big parade or just people coming out
in droves for the Palestinian side.
By the Al Qasim Brigades, Al Quds Brigades,
the largest since the start of the ceasefire
agreement. This took place as they prepared to
hand over prisoners in con Eunice.
It's a huge, huge gathering. Right? Now what
I noticed in this is every time this
has happened in the past, Israel hates this.
They try to bomb or shoot them, but
both of which have happened so far in
recently. But the point is that I think
this is one of the reasons why this
kinda spun out because they don't like seeing
them celebrate. They don't like that being shown
to the world as them undermining Israel's interests.
It's very petty and small. It shows you
how weak they are mentally.
I'm just talking about the Zionist government. Same
thing I would say about our government, by
the way. They're always bombastic and bomb. We
gotta bong harder because you're just you're weak.
You're a weak person that used to demonstrate
strength to make it look like you're strong.
What you saw here is this they they
marched these people out.
The the ones they were gonna exchange ended
up going through this crowd.
Now, I'll show you why that's relevant. Now,
first
or and then because of that,
you saw them marching through the crowd. They
were delivering one of these these detainees.
Israel made a huge statement about this, claiming
they were all they all you really got
was a lot of these Zionist manipulators
making this out to be a lynching. They
literally called it a lynching.
Well, that person was safe the entire time.
They walked through the crowd. The the Hamas
leaders brought their person through and then delivered
them. Nobody touched them other than people delivering
them. There were a lot of people standing
there making photos with their phones, which I
guarantee what they didn't like. But so they
had to lie about it because that's what
Zionists do. They made it out to be
some aggressive thing. They all wanted to they
were raping her with their eyes. That's what
we keep hearing. It's just it's crazy. You
have people that continue to come out and
they keep saying we were treated well, we
were fed. Well, everybody else was starving, by
the way. In fact, they gained weight in
some obvious examples.
But
they have to make it look bad because
they're secretly suffering.
If you have to lie about this after
screaming they were raped and tortured the whole
time, then we can see what's happening.
The point is that they used that excuse,
like we told you they would try, and
they suspended the release of prisoners at that
point. This was the middle of the day.
Citing footage from Gaza, we just showed you,
of them handing over these prisoners with a
large crowd. They claimed it was unsafe for
them.
Israel has halted release of Palestinian security prisoners
to protect protest Gaza, re release chaos.
Well, there there do there is a lot
of people, but it was not what they're
claiming it was.
Israel has halted the release, which as far
as I'm concerned is a violation of the
ceasefire.
Under like, I mean, that's gonna give they're
gonna give a pass, even Hamas most likely,
because they're gonna say, well, we thought there
was danger, so we wanted to pause for
everyone's safety. They don't care about anybody, especially
not their own people. But my point would
be that that's gonna be accepted because a
logical person is gonna say, okay, I guess
that makes sense. And then because what we're
gonna get to is it basically went right
back to it.
They were on buses ready to be released,
and they said, nope, because it's not safe.
Of course, then this propagandist comes out and
says Netanyahu's officially decided not to release the
prisoners today until Israel's promise is Until Israel
is promised a safe release of hostages next
time without being surrounded by 100 of savages.
They can't they cannot hold back their unbridled
racism in everything they do.
These are just Palestinians
who are filming on their phones. The only
reason you wanna make it a problem is
because you need an excuse to not go
through with this. Now, of course, this guy
is incorrect because they went right back to
it. So again, Zionist Online pretending they have
all the insight when they don't,
because it went right back. Now this is
the same day, this is today, and it
says Israel releases Palestinian prisoners after delay over
chaotic hostage handover. So basically,
the mediators assured them that it would be
done differently, there wouldn't be the same thing,
it wouldn't be safe, and then they said,
okay, we'll go back to it. That's good.
I I kinda half expected that was gonna
be the end of it. But I do
think that's what's gonna happen, sadly enough. But
so here's where we are unless something has
changed since we've gone on.
Overall, the point is
they've released a 110 Palestinian so far.
And the Israeli military confirmed that it killed
approximately 10 Palestinians
in a strike
on a gathering of armed terrorists, that's what
they called it,
in West Bank.
Not true.
I mean, we're gonna go over. These are
Palestinian there is no Hamas presence in the
way they're framing it in this location.
This is but let's understand. This is not
Gaza. West Bank is controlled by Israel.
They're just bombing they're bombing people literally under
their control. That's crazy.
That's like the US government bombing Florida. Like,
this it's it's wild what they're doing, and
they're just blatantly pretending it's about terrorism because
they're shift shifted into the West Bank like
we promised.
Trump told them they could. Miriam Adelson paid
him to be able to do it.
It's not confusing. It's very simple.
Then it says Israel's ban on the UN
agency, UNRA. We're going to the next show
potentially tomorrow In regard to UNRA, I pulled
I pulled that off today.
It's the same thing we've been talking about.
But as of right now, today, they're officially,
I guess, banned in Gaza,
which is going to guarantee these people are
going to suffer. That's the whole point. Nobody
but UNRA at this point is helping these
people.
And it says to evacuate their headquarters. Now
Norway, at the same time, it just announced
$24,000,000
to UNRA. Now how much do you wanna
bet if that got sent that they're not
gonna send it back? They won't bet you
anything. No, no, we'll do it for you
or not. Not give them anything and starve
the death, but take the money for sure.
So that's where we are. Let Let me
just update this and see if there's anything
new that popped up.
Looks about the same.
Now Patrick Kennington points out, now there's many
reports of this, and this goes back to
every single time we've seen.
From the flower massacre dynamic to previous hostage
releases,
Israel is releasing Palestinians
and then shooting at them.
That's why I played that opening clip. Like,
the the snipers are waiting to pick these
people off. This happened every time so far.
As Patrick Henningsen reports, this is the level
of degeneracy of Israel's apartheid culture. The cradle
reports Israeli forces are opening fire on Palestinians
around the very buses they've rolled out to
release the prisoners in and this this is,
in, Bethune.
It's crazy to me how many times this
continues to happen. Now realize that they've continued
to open fire on Palestinians, whether in the
hostage dynamic or just in Gaza or the
West Bank or Syria or in Lebanon. We'll
go through all of it. On top of
that, this is what the difference is, guys.
These are the hostages being released.
They're actual hostages. This guy
was taken when he was a child
at the age of 14.
Captive was released in the deal.
Skin and bone infected with scabies,
traumatized.
That's the guy you're looking at right here.
That's what it looks like to be stuck
since you're 14.
Right? He's 20 years old. He's been in
prison for 6 years
with no charge,
and that's what he looks like.
Right? Just in case you forgot,
this
is what they look like.
And everyone before them, by the way, literally
high fiving, cheering, hands in the air. Now
look, I'm not saying this was not a
traumatizing event. My point is it's pretty obvious
and they've maintained this to this point that
they weren't tortured. They weren't raped. They weren't
starved. Clearly, clearly not starved.
That is what it looks like. That's why
Israel's projecting what they're doing because these are
the villains, guys.
Not every Israeli or every Jew or every
Christian, but the people doing that, whatever color
they are, whatever religion they pretend to practice.
That is a crime. That is a villain.
Whoever's doing that.
The people that kept people like this
certainly could be secret villains, but pretty clearly
that's not what it's projecting. It's projecting people
that took care of them, that made sure
they were dressed properly when they were released,
made sure that they were fed, made sure
that they weren't tortured and raped, and,
obviously, you get the point.
That's what's going on.
Now, the Bebas overlap was already used. I
already played this for you. Now, whether they
tried to deviate from this or that's only
gonna come back up in the next phase
2, which is what I'm I'm arguing is
gonna be the case, I just wanna reiterate
that this has already been pushed forward. He
followed up on the 29th.
Avi Mayer, who is the former editor in
chief of Jerusalem Post.
Israel demanded that Hamas provide information on the
fates of the Biba's family. But you guys
know this. We've already pointed this out. They
all know this already. It has already been
publicly reported and even covered by corporate media
that the father said publicly they were killed
by IDF bombs.
Now every person before him that's given one
of these videos while under Hamas custody
has maintained sense what they said then. It's
pretty simple. Right? And we already know that
Yasmin Porat from on October 7th and plenty
of other people that have come back from
Gaza have all confirmed that IDF bombs are
killing hostages.
And so here we are where they're still
trying to play up this family even though
they know he told you they were killed
by you,
and you still use them. You still try
to act aghast that you think even though
you already know, like with everything else. Like
pretending that girl was raped even though you
know she wasn't because your own video evidence
proved that it wasn't that we now know.
That's just additional information we already verified this
with other data before.
Like or that the rape hoax entirely was
manufactured but many still push it including in
Trump's executive order.
Makes me sick.
And this is Mohammed Shehada making this point.
This is back on January 25th. Oh, take
note how the how Twitter is suppressing my
tweets right here.
Just take note. This is very clear. That's
not how that's supposed to look. Right? It's
supposed to look like that. So you can
see, which you go back, and then well,
so now you still can't. That's so funny.
I'm telling you guys, that's not by accident.
That is Twitter suppressing that that metadata pop
out. It's supposed to show the link, as
it usually does. Right? It shows you the
video, it shows them in bed, but not
now. Maybe on somebody else's channel or they're
in bed, who knows? But that's that's Twitter
for you. They're censoring for Israel, partnered with
the ADL, working with the World Economic Forum.
It's all very obvious. Muhammad Shahada points out
that there's a concerted effort to to blow
up the ceasefire
using the Peebus family even though they already
know what happened.
We're gonna be covering this. I guarantee it's
gonna come to pass one way or the
other.
Now overlapping that point, Giannis,
Varouf Varoufaka
Faqis says, Israel holds 3,376
hostages.
Palestinians held without charge. I'm of the minds
more than that, but that's what you can
prove. Of those, more than 300
are children.
In total, Israel olds holds 10,400
people
who have no civil liberties courtesy of living
in an apartheid state under military occupation, lest
we forget.
Very easy to prove.
But all they wanna do is screwing up
military people who were taken while committing an
occupation,
and now a genocide.
Again, overlapping that point I made, I'll just
include this for you. Just so I wanted
you to see that is this is the
woman that they claimed who has now been
released. And again, as he points out, they
knew this.
Right? They knew that it wasn't true. Not
only was it exposed as a lie, well
before this, it was shown that the Israelis
and her family all knew that her pants
had been bloodied by her they they her
hands and her wrists and her ankle that
were cut, you can see in the picture,
by sitting on them in the car.
That they actually had full video of her
inside the building all along and intentionally didn't
release it to manufacture this fake symbol for
a mass rape hoax.
It's unbelievable and disgusting how sinister all this
is. Using their daughter, in fact. And then
back to the point they made at the
beginning.
Now that we know they're not raped, we
know they weren't tortured because they told you
that. All they can do is go, well,
they're in an emotionally and medically complex situation.
Even though we now know that they've taken
that wholesale from a quote that was actually
from 2023
about other hostages who had good health according
to everybody,
but they were like, well,
it's complex.
Well, guess what? They've now those same women
are now good.
Still maintained. They were treated well. They got
food. They took them shopping. Yeah. They lied,
guys.
And they're lying yet again with the same
identical quote.
Patrick simply points out, the Zionist cope is
off the charts. Look at what they're trying
to say. It says Hamas is using special
techniques as part of a psychological warfare called
looking after the captains with health.
Here's the Jerusalem post links. Hamas altered hostage
appearance before release report.
Gee, I wondered where that report out. Or
desperate despite nearly starving the hostages,
Hamas uses special techniques to make them look
healthier and more energetic.
No. No. They just fed them as it's
very easy to show because that one girl
was basically heavier than when she went in.
But, you know, narratives,
words that they reports.
They're literally telling you that they were treated
well. But, you know, who cares about the
facts, right?
Here's that video for you, by the way.
Say hello.
They were good treatment. They treated us fine.
All of them. They gave us food and
drinks and clothes.
It's it's embarrassing. Like, I've almost if these
were, like, maniacal sociopaths, I would almost feel
bad for them.
As Greg Stoker points out, in case you
already missed it, Trump is now telling you
the plan is to clean out all of
Gaza, which that's not Trump. That's just the
plan. It's always been there from the very
beginning to Biden or Trump or anybody else
that's in this controlled government has always been
a part of. That's been the plan as
we've been telling you, as Greg has been
telling you from the very beginning.
Greg Stoker was one of the ones that
pointed out the island and the and the
game. They they've been floating old plans from
the beginning. All it was about was removing
all of the Palestinians.
I'll show you why.
But he says as BlackRock is buying up
property in Pacific Palisades and Altoona from desperate
people for cents on the dollar,
Trump is trying to permanently displace Palestinians and
redevelop Gaza.
Americans should realize
whatever the US state is doing to do
is willing to do to Palestinians,
it is willing to actively do to you.
Not as blatant or violently yet.
But think about that, how we're all up
in arms about land grabs and manipulations, but,
of course, it only matters when it's something
that can be used for a bipartisan agenda.
How about it should just matter if it's
human life or if you have principles and
something you disagree with?
Greg also points out when Trump talks about
relocating
1,500,000
Palestinians
from the Gaza Strip,
It's not because he intends to leave 0.5
there.
So think about what he's saying.
There's more than 1,500,000 people there.
So why would he only reference 1,500,000 when
he's talking about moving them somewhere else? He
says he has access to the entire US
intelligence apparatus. And I fear he referenced our
own reporting on Air Force 1 that those
are the numbers who's left.
Right? So basically, either alluding to the fact
that half a 1000000 people have been killed,
which I would agree with,
or that maybe there's a grouping that is
not gonna be involved, or maybe they know
they're gonna kill more before they do that.
Either way, it's a good point.
Why only 1,500,000?
When they're trying to pretend that they haven't
killed all these people. It's very, very clear.
Greg Reese puts this out. Another another couple
clip about the specifically, the the clearing out
of Gaza
overlap with his net his son-in-law talking about
Gaza beachfront property, which, by the way, is
exactly what Trump said recently.
Then are you, mister president, that you can
keep the ceasefire in Gaza
and conclude the 3 phases of this deal?
I'm not confident. That's not our war. It's
their war, but Apologize. I'm not confident, but
I think they're very weakened on the other
side.
Do you support the 2 states Gaza, boy,
I looked at a picture of Gaza. Gaza
is
is like a massive demolition site. That place
is
it's really,
gotta be rebuilt in a different way. The
mental health rebuilding process? My mind.
You know, Gaza's interesting. It's a phenomenal location.
On the sea,
best weather. You know, everything's good. It's
like some beautiful things could be done with
it, but
it's very interesting.
But some
fantastic things could be done with Gaza.
How do you see the future in governance
for Gaza? Well, it depends. I can't imagine.
You could have well, you certainly can't have
the people that were there. Most of them
are dead.
While much of the world decries
genocide,
Trump recently brought up the great real estate
possibilities
in Palestine.
This is reminiscent of his son-in-law,
Jared Kushner's recent comments whose family is also
in the real estate business.
There are real fears on the part of
Arabs, and I'm sure you talk to a
lot of them, who think once Gazans
leave Gaza, Netanyahu is never gonna let them
back in.
Maybe, but I'm not sure there's much left
of Gaza at this point. So, you know,
if you think about even the construct, like,
you know, Gaza, Gaza was not really a
historical precedent. Right? It was the result of
of a war. Right? You had tribes that
were in different places, then Gaza became a
thing.
Egypt, you know, used to run it, and
then, you know, over time you had different
Yeah. Brush right over the illegal occupation of
Palestine, of course. Notice the same blithe disregard
to all of what's going on by both
of them.
Right? Yeah. It looks like a demolition site.
Yeah. Yeah. Exactly, man. Why is that happening?
Oh, here's some more 2,000 pound bombs. He
knows exactly what's going on. He wants it
to be he wants it to seem like
he's so not involved and it's like not
even on his mind because it's not our
thing,
but here's more bombs to keep it going.
It's just it's just another flavor of the
same ongoing US government support for the genocide,
guys. It has another name, another direction, all
the same outcome.
And he's telling you what they're gonna do.
Like, all the people screaming and crying foul
about North Carolina,
Where's where's your principle, guys? This matters. If
it matters anywhere, it matters here,
or it matters equally. Like, you're talking about
the government trying to seize property from other
people.
I see the point is it only matters
when it's politically,
you know, profitable or politically
advantageous for the side that you're on for
people in teams more politics. The rest of
us just have morals, integrity. Governments that came
in different ways. Both sides are spending a
fortune on military. I think neither side,
really wants to have, you know, a terrorist
organization enclave right between them, and Gaza's waterfront
property, it could be, very valuable. It's a
little bit of an unfortunate situation there, but
I think from Israel's perspective, I would do
my best to move the people out and
then clean it up, but I I don't
think that Israel,
has stated that they don't want the people
to move back there afterwards.
Trump recently suggested Oh, yeah. They have. Over
and over and over, and I can prove
to you that Jared knows that. So you
can see inherent dishonesty, which then I think
clearly proves that they know what they're doing,
and they're lying about it because they know
what they're doing.
That the Palestinian people be moved into other
nations. I'm talking to,
general el Sisi tomorrow, sometime I believe.
And, I'd like Egypt to take people, and
I'd like Georgia to take people. I could
you're talking about
probably a year and a half people,
and
we just clean out that whole thing. It's
you know, it's over the centuries, it's had
many, many conflicts that's like
and I don't know. It's something has to
happen,
but,
it's it's literally a demolition site right now.
Almost everything's demolished. Exactly. I mean, are we
pretending we don't know what that is?
Are are you are you pretending Hamas has
these weapons?
You literally just admitted through your clumsy narratives,
your actions, your word, that we know that
Israel has demolished every single thing in the
plot. You and it's not tunnels and human
shields. We can prove that's not the case.
But they're they're way past that now. They're
now trying to rationalize why we just take
it from you and act like this is
an afterthought,
not the obvious plan from day 1 that
we all know they're involved in, including Trump.
And people are dying there, so I'd rather
get involved with some of the Arab nations
and build housing in a different location where
they can maybe
live in peace
Right. Right. Because all Arabs are the same.
Right?
I mean, I don't actually think they're of
that mind, but I think they're happy to
play into that, to use their the perceived
ignorance so we they won't be seen as
blatantly racist.
But it is, guys. These are not these
these are just interchangeable with any other location.
It's it's it's not the same for any
country anywhere despite that being usually applied to
these people because that's racism.
Like, what's his name with all of the
savages? Why? Because they're there with phones or
because they're brown. Right? That that's what we're
talking about.
What he's telling you is we're gonna just
move them over there. No. No. This is
Palestine. That's their territory. The UN and every
human rights group in the world has maintained
that for 76 years. You guys just don't
care as you've been murdering them the entire
time, promising that would never happen. Now we're
just gonna scoot them over? Well, that's what
you guys said the very beginning, the 1st
week. And you said, no. No. No. That's
never gonna happen. And now Trump acts like
it's an afterthought, like you just thought of
it?
Like, they are acting like you're this stupid.
You're not this stupid.
You know, just like I do, these things
have been talked about over and over from
the very beginning, and Trump's not off in
some some distant island. He's involved in the
political conversation. Now he's got advisers telling him
what Biden went through and what they said.
He knows all this. So he his playing
lofty dumb about this is just a game,
guys. They know what they're doing just like
he knows he's supporting shots that are take
killing your children. Jeff Burley, could be either.
Could be Jeff Burley. Could be long term.
The claim to Israel
by the Zionists
is that the land was promised to them
by God 1000 of years ago, but a
2012
Johns Hopkins study shows that Ashkenazi Jews are
not Semitic people. Geneticist
Eran Eleik found that European Jews were primarily
the children
of a Turkish people known as the Khazars.
And this is where the Zionism comes in.
Right? So that's a point that usually gets
made to make an argument about why the
Jewish people are the problem in this. If
you can't see right there the obvious play
of Zionism using Judaism,
and that's why they're pretending to be they're
playing on you, guys. The point is these
people, like, that point about Netanyahu being from
Poland, and they're from like, that's what he's
highlighting.
Many of these people are not the re
they they
they're pretending to be from this location because
of the Zionist agenda,
which in and of itself is a bastardization
of Judaism.
Like, that's the core point you have to
realize. The whole reason they pretend it's Judaism
is because they claim this is the, you
know, overlap of the second coming and that
God gave them the land, but that's not
supposed to happen until God returned. That's why
orthodox Jews called this out as a fraud.
So you can't have it both ways. It
either is the Jewish issue
or it's Zionism who has bastardized Judaism for
that very reason.
And I think it's obvious.
That's why there's all these Christian Zionists. But
all of it, it doesn't
remove it. There are still a lot of
Jewish people that are tied up with this
that are part of that problem.
Same with Christian people.
I think that's very important to point out,
but it usually gets pushed back from people
that have just decided it's about one religion,
which I think you're taking the bait. Who
converted to Judaism
between the 7th 9th centuries.
Next week, president Trump will be meeting with
Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Trump has received over $200,000,000
from the Israeli lobby who want more than
just Palestine,
and Trump knows that Netanyahu is not open
to a 2 state solution.
Greg Reese reporting.
Greg Reese is doing good work, and I
think what what's important is that Trump also
knows
that the Abraham Accords are all about that.
So he's still pretending
even though every one of them are not
in the past, it was more like, you
know, we're
kind of feigning that we wanted, but, like,
you know, pushing back on it. No. Netanyahu
and across their board. They basically, the entire
Knesset has come out and said we'll never
ever ever ever do that, which if you're
have half a brain and discernment, you already
know that's always been the case because it's
the Harratz has covered it. Even, what's his
name?
Prime minister Barack, I think,
says that this is the point, that it's
all about making sure that we never allowed
the 2 state solution. It's all on the
record. And so the point is that Trump
continues to pretend that he's gonna post the
Abraham Accords, which is all about that. They
don't want it. So there it's just they're
keeping the cycle going so they can keep
the agenda going. Trump is aware of that,
in my opinion.
So you're saying Benjamin Netanyahu
deliberately boosted Hamas to try to prevent a
Palestinian state? Yeah. Sure. He deliberately and systematically
even even told this on record,
whoever wants to avoid
the threat
of a 2 state solution
has to support my policy of paying protection
money to the Hamas.
Right.
Obvious.
Asaf points out, anyone find it odd that
this is what that this is one main
piece,
excuse me, is one of the main pieces
of armaments in Israel's arsenal? These d nine
bulldozers?
It's almost as if the demolition of homes
and civilian infrastructure is Gaza and the West
Bank as a core tactic.
Here's Hanani Naftali. You know, the guy who
got caught lying first in his post October
7th dynamic when he lied about which one
was it? I think it was that very
first hospital they pretended was not their bomb
and, like, they were supposed to be Hamas,
but then they pretended it was theirs. But
and then from there forward, it was we
just did it because tunnels and stuff. The
point is he's like breaking. First shipment of
d nine bulldozers has landed in Israel after
Trump lifted the restrictions.
Thanks, Trump. Why do you need a 130
bulldozers for?
Right? Is is that how you find bombs
and and Hamas tunnels? Well, no. That's how
you demolish infrastructure. And the only way that
would be legal is oh, that's right. It's
not. In any context. Because if you're able
to do that, that means you know that
there's no Hamas there, which means it's against
the law. They know that. They don't care,
guys. So does Trump. So does the rest
of your government. They are supporting an ethnic
cleansing.
The extreme Zionist like Tom Cotton and the
rest of them taking money from APAC, they
are being bought off.
Ask yourself why nobody talks about this. None
of them.
Here is an important point. This is voice
of rabbis that's one of these, you know,
Jewish organizations calling out Zionism,
and it's simply pointing out,
oh, this is when they got censored on
this platform, that they got it back, and
it's simply saying that all that's just this
is the point. This clip is interesting.
It's saying they don't have the power that
Zionist entity does. They oppress them, and
and being anti Zionist gets you shunned from
Jewish places. Seeing them calling,
basically, the point of the clip is ultimately
this guy is a rabbi highlighting the fact
of the majority, ethnic majority. And I think
that's we've already talked about this. This is
the nation state law. This is what they
were really concerned about the idea that they
could lose the ethnic majority.
Now why would that matter if it's a
democracy? Because they're of the mind, and this
is what we're now seeing bleed into US
politics, that these people are a problem. Like,
that's the only way you could frame that.
Is that there's too many Muslims here. There's
too many Arabs there, which by the way,
not all of them overlap. There's all sorts
of different things. There's Israelis that are air.
The point is
they want you to believe
that that's not racist, even though their racist
law in and of itself is the definition
of apartheid state and racism. But here's what
he says, and I believe this clarifies
what they're actually afraid of and what they're
trying to accomplish. Then ask yourself
why they wouldn't want us to state solution
with when you understand this. It's clear.
Because they don't want them there. They want
them out of the way. They're worried that
if they bring them in
with, like, a one state solution, well, suddenly
then they'd lose the majority. But if they
create a 2 state solution, well, then they
were in run the risk of, you know,
allowing them to have any agency which will
expose what they are. Overall, what they're trying
to do is get rid of them entirely.
So they don't have that problem. Ethnically cleanse
them. There's no longer Palestine. Then we can
take the territory and and then fill it
with what we want, and we don't lose
our super majority.
Zionism
presupposes
2 things.
1, the Jews are a nationality,
not just a religion.
Incorrect.
And 2, Israel is the country of that
nationality, that means
if you live in Israel,
even if you're an Israeli citizen and you're
not Jewish,
Israel's not your country
in the sense that
based on the 2018,
nation state law,
only Jews have rights to self determination in
Israel. If you
That's racism,
period. Live in Israel and you're not Jewish.
Israel is not your country. Right? What does
it mean self determination? Self determination rights means
the rights to govern yourself, meaning
only Jews have the right to govern themselves
in Israel, meaning
Israel has to be under the control of
Jews. Now to add to that, to make
sure you understand why what I was saying
before still makes sense,
ask the Ethiopian Jews
whether they have agency. Right? Ask the Palestinian
Jews whether or not they have a they
do not. They're treated as second class citizens
if allowed to be part of society at
all.
So you care to explain that if it's
about Jewish people? Or how about the Orthodox
Jews that don't believe in Zionism? They get
beat up in the streets by the IDF.
How do you make sense of that? Well,
because it's not actually about Judaism. It's about
Zionists. Rather, like what's the there's a term
they use. It's it's just it's about the
Zionist mentality
through Judaism,
which means it's about Zionism, which is why
people like Ben Shapiro went after attacking any
Jewish person that was standing up for a
ceasefire and called them not Jewish.
Think about how insulting that is. Think about
how that would be called racist if anybody
who wasn't a Jewish person made that allegation,
which is what they call racism. Well, you
know, your your Zionism is not Judaism. Oh,
you're racist. But it's okay for him to
denounce Jews who don't agree with the genocide.
Guys, it's so clear to me that all
of this is about specific types of whatever
religion is all in line with Zionism.
In this case,
obviously, it's about Jewish people in Israel, but
Zionism control of it like it is in
the United States, Christian Zionism, like Hegseth and
Cotton,
it's all the same problem.
So in this case, the clear is Judaism
within Israel, but it's Zionism which is pulling
the strings. Right now,
so sure, you can be a member of
the supreme court. You could do whatever you
want. You have these civil rights. As long
as you're a minority,
then you could do whatever That's not entirely
accurate, by the way, but we'll we'll come
back to this stuff. Like, the point is
that there's a lot of evidence showing these
people whether or not, you know, Israel proper
citizenship in Israel, that they're still very much
not treated as equal citizens. Want, but you
cannot control the country.
That right belongs to the Jews.
And so long as the Jews are a
majority,
no big deal.
It's a slam dunk.
But should there be what Israel calls a
demographic threat?
Should there be millions of Palestinians
in the West Bank and Gaza
such that if Israel annexes it, now the
Jews will be a will be in danger
of being a minority.
Israel cannot allow that.
Right?
That's where we are.
Now here
oops.
This one first. Here is the article I've
shown. I've just there's many of these guys.
You take the time to look into this.
This is from DW. Are you Ethiopian Jews,
Israel's 2nd class citizens? Well, you listen to
them, they'll tell you that. They're treated as
not part of the community
simply because they're Ethiopian, whether or not they're
Jewish,
which proves what I'm talking about. And this
is from Zionist Israelis, guys. Or in this
case,
this is oh, this is a different one.
This was Voice of Rabbis, but same point.
And then, guys, if you've seen this clip,
it makes me sick. This is a a
Zionist woman,
a Jewish Zionist woman who is walking by
Orthodox Jews holding Palestinian flags, and you've seen
this before. She very simply walks by, and
you this
I'll I'll include this.
It's not some taken out of context thing.
It's very clear. She says, Hitler made one
big mistake. You should have all been in
gas chambers. Too bad. Walks down, says it
again. Hitler made a mistake. You should have
been in the gas chambers. Too bad,
but we're here. You're going to hell. That's
what she says, and she walks along with
a friend
to orthodox Jews
as an Israeli
Jewish Zionist.
How do you make sense of that other
than what we're talking about?
Or I was gonna grab one more, and
this is the one I was trying to
grab.
How does that keep happening? Oh, did they
change hold on.
Is that just what they've changed their name
to now?
Oh, wow. How did I miss this?
No. It's still there. Hold on. What is
going on here? Wait. That's a different one
now. Something very strange is happening here. I
don't know if you can see that, but
look. If you look at my if my
tool if you can see
what I'm searching for, I don't know if
that shows up or not. See how these
say Torah Judaism
on x?
I click on these.
That says it's not there anymore.
Now, Torah Judaism is not the account that
we just saw, but if I go to
that and search for it,
that's not the account. That's not the right
one.
What in the hell is going on? That's
wild. And so maybe that's what this became.
Maybe they're that that's what it says. They
just got brought back. Guys, how do I
miss that? How did nobody tell me that?
If this account got censored on Twitter, that's
a big deal.
Man, I gotta follow-up on that. Because this
is not the same account. Because Torah Judaism
that we've been covering, that's the name of
the account,
had, what, 200,000 followers?
Wow. Anyway, I I don't wanna I don't
know. Maybe I'm missing something. I'll come back
to this.
I'll include these for you. But regardless, we
know what Twitter is censoring on this platform.
Let me just do that. I'll come back
to it. Now here's Mint Press News.
Ben Gavir
saying for years, I've been talking about encouraging
voluntary migration from Gaza. That's the solution. There
is no other solution.
Well, okay. So let's say, well, as we
can prove that none of them want to
leave.
So then we're done. Right? You said voluntary.
Well, no. Of course not. That's this maniac's
euphemism for ethnic cleansing.
Voluntary, and if they don't, we'll murder them
or push them somewhere else. But it's their
choice, just like the shot, right?
These are the maniacs we're talking about. Here's
the other maniac. This is Smotrich. And as
we as Kim got Kim dot com points
out, Israel on the record, both Netanyahu, Gavir,
Smotrich, all of them have publicly made this
clear, they want to expand into 6 sovereign
countries because God said, or not because that's
just their agenda, but they want you to
think it's God even though it came from
the UK government,
and plenty of other Orthodox Jewish organizations called
them out for that lie. But it says,
I want a Jewish state that includes Jordan,
Lebanon, parts of Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia.
He's publicly telling this to an interview because
it's that obvious to see. Then you got
the, the wises of the world who are
out there building settlements in Syria, in Lebanon,
in Gaza while your government and your media
pretends like it's just about freedom and fighting
bad guys.
This is the colonial project. They're openly taking
territory,
and your government, both sides of it, are
actively taking their part or
being manipulated to lie about it. Now you
you can decide who you think is driving
this bus. I think it's kinda clear with
stuff like this especially.
Trump's unconstitutional
antisemitism executive order.
Now we talked about this yesterday. Make sure
you watch this. I think it's important to
go over a lot of stuff in there.
But here is forward from the Jewish independent
platform.
Trump antisemitism
executive order invokes anti KKK law. Here's what
it says.
Donald Trump's executive order on antisemitism encourages the
attorney general
to use a federal law created to target
the Ku Klux Klan
and will direct federal agencies to tell colleges
and universities to, quote, monitor
and report activities by foreign students. But it's
not just that. See, this is the only
way they're framing it.
You can read it right from the order
that makes it clear that anybody, including Americans,
could potentially be removed from this country if
they claim they broke the lie antisemitism
law, which applies in all sorts of ways.
By the way, any anti Semitism law is
unconstitutional,
therefore, null and void. So they're all unconstitutional.
But they if they just decide what they're
doing here, they pretend executive orders are laws
anyway. Right? So suddenly, they call you antisemitic
for saying Zionism is not Judaism, and suddenly
they make the argument that you can be
arrested for that. That's happening in the UK,
but the Elons are screaming about it because
it's only about what they claim is one
side of the conversation.
Even though it's the same thing. It's called
hate speech. It's called censorship. It's called suppression
based on the idea that you're say that's
the same thing,
but they're okay with one of them because
they're hypocrites.
So also the Ku Klux Klan, you're literally
arguing with the it's it's you have to
see how transparent this is through Trump
because they want you to think Hamas, KKK.
Really? So there's your vanilla ISIS dynamic. Guys,
it's ridiculously
lazy. Or how about ISIS if they want
to? Even though both of those are so
contradictory, it's insulting.
And you can prove that ISIS and Al
Qaeda, and and they're all working with Israel
and the United States in the same way.
But it goes on to say, the anti
defamation league said it had provided recommendations to
the Trump administration and praised the order.
Are you okay with that?
Aren't these the same people we recall? Isn't
it the ADL, the group that was calling
you racist for wearing a red hat? Why
are you supporting this?
The order expands on a 2019 executive order
from Trump.
That's right, guys. Because the first one was
Donald Trump's in his last administration.
It's amazing if you can stop listening to
narrative. All the facts are pretty clear.
That directed federal agencies to interpret
a crucial provision of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964 as covering antisemitism.
So here's how this game keeps getting played.
We don't need new extensions to apply to
one specific group. The laws are already in
place.
It's against the law to, harass or attack
somebody.
Right? It's against the law to
be violent against anybody. Everything else is a
game where they're extending this out to say
you can't think or say these things, but
only in the context of our foreign adverse,
excuse me, ally.
Who needs adversaries when you got friends like
Israel?
And endorse the widespread but controversial
International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition
as the IHRA,
which includes
the anti Zionism.
So that's like saying anti republicanism is hating
Christians.
That's how stupid this is. And you can
see Jewish organizations all around the world, they're
telling you that's not what we believe.
That's not the same thing. So if you
know there's major Jewish organizations that are telling
you that's not what all Jews believe, then
you can't simply broad stroke and say that's
what Judaism is. That is what Zionism wants.
Pretty simple.
And Trump is the one executive ordering this
into reality
twice.
Now it says the new order reaffirms the
previous order, which was never fully implemented
and states that federal policy will be to
use all available and appropriate legal tools to
prosecute, remove, or otherwise hold to account
the perpetrators
of unlawful anti Semitic harassment and violence. So
when you get into harassment,
that we already know what they're calling
that. If I say you're a Zionist committing
genocide, they call that harassment. So under Donald
Trump's America and free speech, they wanna tell
you that an American could be arrested
for harassing,
which would be what? Holding a Palestinian flag?
Telling you you're committing a genocide because they
are?
It's not about Jewish people, but that's the
way they play this game.
Now it says specifically, the new order calls
on every federal agency to identify any powers
that they can use to quote,
curb or combat antisemitism. They say that many
times, end of sentence.
So that's my point as always. Now even
if you wanna pretend that there's not gonna
be any legal, like, arresting of people, which
I think it's very naive to think that.
When he says any action to curb or
combat
antisemitism,
that is unconstitutional.
Not least of which because what they mean
when they say that 90% of the time
seems to be anything but. And especially when
you realize that Israelis are not Semites, but
that's a whole another conversation. The point is
that that is a thought, a feeling, an
opinion.
So what they're telling you is right now
in this country, we are making it against
the law through executive order to have an
opinion about Semites.
That's what they're saying. But then realize that
waving an American Palestinian flag is being called
antisemitism.
So now it's illegal to wave the Palestinian
flag? Well, yes, they're telling you that's curbing
or combating antisemitism. So whether they put you
in prison or simply just give you a
fine, the point is that they are telling
you that that is not allowed anymore. That
is unconstitutional.
That is a violation of your rights.
You think Trump doesn't know that?
You think Israel doesn't know that?
We're gonna get into this.
It says, in addition, it says that the
attorney general was encouraged to use the federal
conspiracy against rights law
to combat antisemitism.
Broadening this out left and right so a
foreign government could come after Americans if you
dare criticize what they're doing.
Otherwise known as free speech in Trump, Elon
land.
Now it says Trump's 2019 order was less
broad in its scope.
It was tailored to clarify education department investigations
into antisemitism.
Its ultimate impact was limited.
And here's what's important to remember for the
next part.
It says it its impact was limited in
part
because the Trump administration
never fully implemented it. You'll see why that's
relevant in a second. Then it goes on
to say president Joe Biden
left the order in place during his administration,
but similarly never converted it from presidential decree.
Right? So same guy right now. It's executive
order. It hasn't actually been fully this is
the same thing. But what's important to recognize
is that it went from Trump to Biden
back to Trump, and they all did the
same thing.
Now the reason it's relevant, I'll show you
next, they're already trying to pretend like Biden
tried to stop this. It's just not true.
It's just they're trying to get a short
little win to make you think it us
doing this is good because Biden didn't want
it. That is how dumb they think you
are. Clinton didn't want the biometric wall, so
we need to do it because bad guy
no. They're just very simply, like, basic reverse
psychology tricking you into wanting your own subjugation.
Before we come back to that,
the conspiracy against rights law.
Now that, as it says here, is a
law the law of conspiracy
against rights is a federal offense
in the United States under 18 USC
241. It prohibits
2 or more individuals
from conspiring
to injure,
oppress,
threaten, or intimidate any person in any state,
territory, commonwealth, possession, or district
in the free exercise or enjoyment of any
right or privilege secured to them by the
constitution or laws of the United States.
You know what's interesting about that?
They they're
they're gonna make this about who they want
it to be about. What's funny to me
is that literally outlines, like, basic Israeli tactics
through ADL, through APAC, through all sorts of
manipulative groups that are going after people for
simply calling out their genocide, getting people fired
from their jobs, you know, otherwise known as
the woke right at the moment.
Do you think it's gonna apply?
So if you find out there are 2
Zionists who are colluding to oppress, threaten, or
intimidate you, which happens literally every 10 seconds
on this platform, you think they're gonna do
anything about it? No. I'm gonna that's my
opinion. They're gonna go after people who are
simply saying, Palestinians should be free. Oh, god.
They're racist. Get them because they're threatening me
with their comments for peace. We've actually already
seen those arguments.
So that's where I think this goes. So
it's broadening this out to become a federal
offense if they simply argue that you did
it together
to suppress their rights. But what they're literally
doing here is the suppression of your rights.
Talk about the great inversion. Right? We're literally
in 1984 here, guys. This is ridiculous.
And then it goes on. So remember, Donald
Trump is the one who did not fully
implement it during his administration. Biden
left it there, which shows you how they're
allowing, you know, same same agenda,
but also similarly didn't implement at all. Now
it says the ADL
has called for more aggressive action against students
protesting
Israel,
including
asking school presidents to investigate students for justice
in Palestine,
a Jewish organization,
chapters for providing material support to terrorist organizations.
Well, actually, I I think is that correct?
Students and Justice for Palestine.
I may take it back just in case
I'm wrong on that. I know that Jewish
Voices for Peace is one of them, but
there was one that didn't have any explicit
Jewish x, y, and z in the name,
but was what was led by a Jewish
organization. But just in case I'm wrong, I'll
pull it back. The point though, is that
what they're literally telling you,
we want you to go after Americans who
are speaking what they believe.
Not because they're threatening or because they're they're
colluding to suppress. No, they're just basically saying
don't let them protest Israel. That's how blatant
this is.
More aggressive and then Trump followed suit. ADL
asks,
Elon Musk and Trump follow suit.
It says Republicans have focused almost all of
their attention on what they believe is antisemitism
coming from the left wing activists and critics
of Israel.
Right. Because there's not a single Republican out
there that's openly going, yes, we can see
the genocide. Like, it's just so selectively applied.
Clearly, this is even Greenblatt made it clear.
This is not a left right thing. But
that's the only way through Trump's administration they
can make this look like it makes sense.
Right? Because you'll get far too many Republicans
that are gonna go, well, pretty sure that's
the whole free speech thing. But, you know,
but that Israel's button, they're being accused that,
you know, it's anti semitic. And we know
the lefts are crazy. So democrat bad.
You know it's as simple as that, guys,
and it's working for some people. I don't
think it's the majority.
The White House fact sheet, which lists education
adviser Eric Bledsoe as the author, also stated
that in immediately
following October 7th, Hamas terrorist attack against Israel,
pro Hamas, aliens, and left wing radicals began
a campaign of no. They didn't.
Intimidation, vandalism, violence. Do you know how many
times?
It's the same with all the Israeli propaganda.
Even the corporate media in this country was
basically forced to acknowledge that this was a
massive campaign of psychological lies.
Fake stabbings in the eye, fake we just
went over yesterday,
a whole series of fake claims of antisemitism
that were then proven by the police to
be faked by the Jewish person in the
home.
It it's just ludicrous how obvious all this
continues to be. But so what they're telling
you is the lie, just like all the
atrocity propaganda.
Pro Hamas well, first of all, most of
these groups are very forward about being pro
Palestine,
but they can't stop showing you why they
think that's the same thing because they're the
disgusting people. But it goes on to say,
left wing radicals began a campaign of intimidation,
vandalism. No, guys. I don't I see very
little example of this. But it doesn't matter,
though. That's just the narrative written out to
justify why they'll censor your rights. Now it
says celebrating Hamas' mass rape, kidnap see? This
is written in his executive order.
Mass rape, the one of the very clear
atrocity propaganda campaigns that were provably false to
this very day, even now using the central
player in that lie.
Do you think he doesn't know that?
Does he does he not care? It doesn't
matter. At this point, it's a lie. We
know it's a lie, and they're basing that,
why they need to censor you for having
an opinion about what we can prove is
the case.
And it says they physically block Jewish Americans
for intent. No, they did not.
Every time we saw that, it was some
lazy way of acting like you got in
my way. And that when you pan back
and they are pushing into the crowd when
they could just walk around.
Or cases where they did not block anything
as we proved to you, and that was
what Stefanik was screaming. And it got very
clearly proven to not even be remotely what
they said, but it it spreads like wildfire.
Every corporate platform just picks it up without
research and shares it just like mainstream alternative
media. Gee. I wonder where that comes from.
It says, well, the Biden administration turned a
blind eye to this coordinated assault. No. They
didn't, guys. They went after it just like
the rest of them did. It's just so
blind. Now it's the supporters, including establishment groups
like the ADL, hail the order, saying it
was designed to give the federal government more
tools to protect Jews from antisemitism.
Why does that need to be the case?
It's already a crime to commit all the
things that you would argue that would be
included. The Republicans making it about not just
words, There's laws for all of it already.
So the only thing it applies
to is claiming we're not people aren't allowed
to express an opinion.
Even if that is exactly what you think
antisemitism is, you know as well as I
that's protected under your first amendment rise.
So if you're not courageous enough to admit
that you're compromising your principles because it goes
against your party, well, then you're a coward.
Just gonna call it out. Skeptics worried that
it was too focused on staunching
staunching criticism of Israel while others focused on
the order's apparent classification of Jews as an
ethnic group, collapsing the complexity of Jewish identity.
They just love to play this game. It's
just not the reality.
Simple.
It's a religion, period.
Civil rights investigators at the Department of Education
were trained on the order and told to
consider the IHRA
definition when investigating cases. There you go. That's
been a central point in this. And even
other Jewish organizations speak out about how that's
wrong, guys.
This is not about Jewish people. This is
about Zionist control over our government.
And I'll point to this article yet again
in the show we did, Zionism versus Nazism,
Israel's connection to extremist ideology, and the ADL's
history of faking Nazi marches. We just went
over this in the last show in a
in a couple extensive ways.
Here
is that one point I wanted to make
sure you didn't miss. So this is voice
of rabbis making sure you understand that Israel
was founded under the sponsorship of Adolf Hitler.
For those that go, oh my god. How
dare you say such a grievous lie? No.
No. It's very easily proven, and even Heretz
covered it. The point is since this will
get major pushback from Zionists running from their
own history or those too ignorant to know,
be sure to watch our show talking about
this and the over connection between the 2.
Here
is the Heretz article. As it as Heretz
reported in 2023,
Zionism continued to seek an ally with Nazi
Germany even after the final solution had begun.
If you do not know this, ask yourself
how that's possible. Here's Heretz, Zionist military org's
efforts to recruit Nazis. Here's the passage that's
important.
Transcripts of the interrogation of this leader of
the Zionist movement were released
through their archives, and it includes information on
the dark chapter of their history. Lehi being
a central part of the foundation of Zionism,
its ties with Nazi Germany.
It says, quote, we will communicate with any
military power ready to help the establishment of
the kingdom of Israel even if it's Germany.
As Dan Cohen has covered many times as
a Jewish reporter himself, the obvious point is
if they were working with Nazi Germany during
the final solution, how does it make sense
to pretend that Zionism itself is protection against
never again from the thing that they were
a part of?
Yeah. It's really contentious. I get it, but
it's also the truth.
Now here are a few different statements, and
there's an endless amount of these from former
IDF, from former from Holocaust survivors. I mean,
there's people all around the world that are
making this case, which is
they use antisemitism
to hide their crimes. In no way should
that ever be taken as racism or antisemitism
doesn't exist.
It simply means that people who are pretending
to fight against it, embellish it, grow it,
fake it in order to justify
suppressing your thoughts and your speech, now using
your own government to do it against you.
This is,
Sholem Alemany,
a leading Israeli politician who served as government
minister
admitting that exact point.
Then when there is
dissent expressed in the United States against policies
of the Israeli government,
people here are called anti Semitic.
What is your response to that as an
Israeli Jew? Well, it's a trick. We always
use it. When from Europe somebody is criticizing
Israel, then we bring up the holocaust.
When in this country people are criticizing Israel,
then they are anti Semitic.
And the organization
is strong and has a lot of money.
And the
ties between
Israel and the American Jewish establishment
are very strong, and they are strong in
this country.
As you know,
they have power, which
it's okay. They are talented people, and they
have power, money,
and media, and other things.
And their attitude is Israel, my country, right
or wrong. The identification.
And they are not ready to hear criticism.
And it's very easy
to blame people who criticize
certain acts of the Israeli government
as anti semitic
and to bring up the holocaust
and the suffering of the Jewish people.
And that's that justify everything we do to
the Palestinians.
Yep.
Now, again, that doesn't mean that there's not
valid things to be concerned about or that
there's not clear hatred against Jewish people for
no reason, which, by the way, is the
whole point. Zionism is breeding that. That is
how they justify their own existence. But even
without that, it still wouldn't exist. This is
simply a provable reality of how Israel, not
Judaism, but Israel uses them as some sort
of
human shield.
Here's another example. This one is John,
how do you say it? Meerschmeyer,
exposing the same point.
Chapter or the section of the book where
we talk about this
charge of antisemitism
is called the great silencer.
That's what we call the charge of antisemitism,
the great silencer.
Who wants to be called an antisemite,
especially in the wake of the Holocaust?
Do I want to be called an antisemite?
Oh my God. No.
And,
so it's very effective,
But, you know, it is important to talk
about these issues,
in my humble opinion. They wanted to silence
us.
And
this is not good.
Right? It's not good for Israel. It's not
good for the United States, and I would
argue in the end, if anything, it's gonna
foster anti semitism. Exactly. I think you don't
wanna run around
telling people that they can't talk about Israel
without being called an anti Semite. It's just
not it's not healthy.
Well, it's designed to do that. And I'll
I'll include I'll grab Dan Cohen's interview about
this, which I think is exactly that point.
Now and it's interesting because, you know, Dan
is out there
very right and I think we're on the
very exactly the same page with this. And
you please come to your own conclusions about
it. We're never claiming that I'm always right.
I very well could be wrong. But I
think it's very clear in my opinion. And
Dan has been out there trying to push
back on the people that are, you know,
these major accounts that are seemingly misleading people
into the idea that it's just about Jewish
people. Now there I can understand how people
can be led into that. That's the game.
But I'd like to believe if they were
had discernment
with people like me out there waving our
hands and putting this out there, and we're
not some small platform. Like, my point is
they see this stuff. And so I think
people then choose to stay on that path.
But my point is Dan's out there pushing
back on that, going, guys, this is where
we're being misled. And this is a Jewish
person himself who is actively taking the very
contentious stance of calling out Zionism
as a Jew himself, and then still having
to push back on the people who are
like, as he even does that, acting like
he's somehow the one deceiving. It's very frustrating.
My opinion is he's coming from a very
honest place, and he just sees the real
problem and has the courage to call it
out. Here is another example of that. You
know Finkelstein as somebody who is, you know,
family from the holocaust. The point is that
he is a Jewish person himself and has
always, always had the stance, even though it's
just like RFK, so aggressively misrepresented,
that you should have every right, because it
is free speech, to say whatever you want
about the holocaust. But he is very clear
about his stance that the Holocaust is very
real. And, yes, they were Jews. They're persecuted.
Nonetheless, because it is still free speech, we
should be allowed to say what we want.
I know. Crazy. Right? Like, it just shows
you even with that point, how crazy it
is that there's this one point of just
carved out conversation that you're just not allowed
to why?
I get it. It's in you could say
it's insulting. You could say it's challenging the
memory of your family. Sure. That you could
be insulted about it. But the way that
people go after them and box people out
of society, lose their jobs, that's because of
Zionism.
If you believed in free speech, you'd allow
people to say what they want. And then
you'd also have the right to say, you're
absolutely disgusting and stupid,
Right? That's how that works, but this is
a different part of it. Here is Finkelstein
telling you this. The industry built around it.
Now the reason I gave you that preface
is because it's important not to misrepresent what
he's saying.
Just because he argues you have the right
to challenge this, he's been clear over his
career about the the re what he believes
about the history.
I was wondering if you could tell us
what the holocaust industry is.
Basically, it's the exploitation
of
the colossal suffering of Jews during World War
2
for political, and then for a certain period,
financial gain.
The political gain was basically using the Nazi
Holocaust as a club
to silence criticism of Israel.
And at some point, this Holocaust compensation
racket,
the extraction of monies
from European governments
in the name of what were called leading
holocaust victims,
began.
And
several I think that figure comes now to
about $20,000,000,000
were,
coerced
from European governments, mostly on fraudulent grounds.
And then there was all of this
schlock
nonsense,
which basically is used
to defend
Israel and deflect criticism of Israeli policy.
It didn't.
You can usually tell this literature because it's,
it
asserts or insists on the absolute uniqueness of
the Nazi holocaust,
the claim that no people in the history
of
in history of humanity
have ever suffered the way Jews suffered.
And that's clearly an ideological claim. You can't
intellectually prove things like that. It's almost
absurd to want to prove them.
The purpose is fairly straightforward.
That is,
if people have uniquely
suffered,
then they can't be held to conventional
moral and legal standards.
So for example, if
you say that Israel tortures Palestinian
detainees,
then you're told remember the Holocaust.
Or if you're told that Israel illegally demolishes
the homes of Palestinians,
You're told, remember the holocaust.
The point being
that because Jews suffered uniquely,
it somehow excuses these
by any other standard
crimes.
Here is,
it was, professor Ilan Poppe talking about the
same point.
Yes. We are in a very strange age
where,
Israel is is weaponizing,
anti semitism in order to stifle
debate about Palestine and silence criticism
against its its policies.
What is surprising is not so much that
Israel wants to do it, but that so
many British politicians
and public figures are willing to go along
with it. Of course, there is a difference
between Zionism and Judaism. And therefore, there is
a difference between anti Zionism
and antisemitism.
And anybody who confuses it is either an
ignorant
person or someone who
manipulates the truth in order not to allow,
the, reality on the ground in Palestine to
be discussed
genuinely and candidly between everyone who's interested
in peace and reconciliation
in that land.
Exactly.
Here's my interview with Dan Cohen, the manufactured
of the Noli's plight
and the Zionism linchpin.
Here's one of these many Jewish orthodox groups
holding signs saying Judaism rejects Zionism
and the state of
Israel in quotes.
Now, here is the order itself.
Additional measures
to combat antisemitism. That's what it's titled. January
29th. Additional measures.
Right? So why do we need more measures
to fight
a thought,
an opinion?
Because they all they're all the only way
they get even I which I argue are
simply dishonest people that very clearly have an
agenda to pretend they're fighting for free speech
or fight against
violent acts of foreign influencers
even though the most obvious representation of that
is the very people you think you're protecting.
The point is that this is not it
as the same point from before, there are
already laws on the books that meet all
of these things.
Any of the things that the Republicans who
are pretending that wanna say, say, like, violence
or harassment. Well, there are already laws for
all of that. So all you're really saying
is you wanna carve out a very specific
aspect of it for one group of people,
which then obviously becomes unconstitutional
because it's about ideas.
It's as simple as it gets. It's just
so transparent, and we went over this recently.
It says my administration has fought and will
continue to fight antisemitism in the United States
and around the world and around the world.
They always say that.
So are you fighting anti Islam? Are you
fighting anti are you fighting Russophobia?
Are you fighting anti Christian? I why? Why
not? If you're fighting to
all around the world in the United States,
simply ideas, why wouldn't you start with Christianity?
Good point.
I've heard that brought up. I mean, I
just there's so many of these examples because
we're supposed to pretend like he was just
saying. There's a very unique dynamic here.
People have suffered in very clear ways all
around the world as far back as you
wanna look.
Look. It's not unique. 1 with people, it
does not then justify more criminal action to
other people. That just makes you the problem.
The bottom line here
is that
which is being framed as simply pro Palestine
is your right to think and say what
you want.
So here,
on December 11, 2019, Donald Trump says he
issued his first one back in his his
last administration. Right? And it says on combating
antisemitism. And we all cried foul then too.
And a lot of Republicans who are now
pretending they don't see it were also calling
that up. It says, in particular,
faced antisemitic harassment in schools and on university
college campuses. Okay. Fair. Fine. So if you
wanna make it about harassment, well, guess what?
There are already laws against harassment. So you
don't need
this. So then this is if they're feigning
that to get you to be to basically
suppress your speech. Then it says executive order
13 899, f 2019, from Trump's administration
provided
interpretive assistance on the enforcement of the nation's
civil rights laws to ensure that they would
protect American Jews to the same extent to
which all of the Americans were protected. Okay.
Why do you need that?
It's only about the words. If there's anything
that has to do with actions, violence, threats,
there's already laws for all of it. There's
just no way to misunderstand this. So all
they're trying to do is carve out a
very clear picture of why you think they're
more threat and then say, well, it's just
words though, or rather it's just violence though.
But it's not though because all the lies
already apply.
I just don't get why anybody with a
brain can't see right through this.
And it says,
the prior administration
effectively nullified this order
by failing to give the terms of the
order full force and effect through the government.
Now, we talked about that. That's not the
truth.
Trump didn't initiate Trump didn't implement it fully,
then he passed it off to Biden and
Biden didn't implement it fully. So if you're
gonna blame Trump for Biden for not doing
it, well, then you'd blame yourself too. But
you see, life truth doesn't matter today. We're
in the post truth world. Thank you, Bilderberg.
They're all a part of it.
This is them pry trying to give you
a lazy point about why Biden didn't finish
it. So we need to because that's if
Biden didn't, then the right thing to do
is to go forward. Who cares if it's
you fighting against your own free speech,
undermining your own constitutional rights if as long
as Biden didn't, so we'll do it.
It's lazy.
I don't know why. I mean, it's just
as lazy and reactive as a lot of
Israeli propaganda. That's probably why it looks that
way. It says these attacks unleashed on unprecedented
wave of vile antisemitic discrimination vandal. No, it
didn't.
Provably did not. The ADL was caught for
this lie about it was Palestinian flags, and
they claimed every single one of them was
antisemitism and all these liars went along with
it.
Jewish students have faced unrelenting barrage of discrimination,
denial of accent. No, same old lie. Lie
after lie after lie. Oh, and by the
way, the ones after words and thoughts. Intimidation,
harassment, threat. Well, there's there's laws for that.
So you don't need this.
Then it says identifying all
civil and criminal authorities or actions within jurisdiction
of that agency, and all agencies by the
way, beyond those already implemented under the first
order that might be used to simply curb
or combat antisemitism.
As I said before,
that's not about violence or threats. That's curbing
or stopping your thoughts on this
if it happens to be anti what they're
talking about, or they frame it that way.
Anybody who's trying to pretend this is not
a blatant violation of your constitutional rights is
a liar.
And he says, it shall be the policy
of the United States to combat
antisemitism
vigorously
using all available and appropriate legal tools to
prosecute,
remove,
or otherwise hold to account
the perpetrators of unlawful antisemitic harassment and violence.
Okay. Paul, that's one full section.
You wanna point out where that says foreign
visa student? It doesn't.
That should scare you if you thought this
was about something else. This very clearly says
that their policy is to go after you
for having a thought that they don't think
you're allowed to have, whether it's racist or
not, that's what it says, and then use
all their appropriate legal tools.
So I because there's appropriate legal tools, does
not change the fact that that's using illegal
tools to unconstitutionally
attack you for your speech,
to prosecute, remove, or otherwise hold to account
for a thought.
Four words.
Remove?
Prosecute?
Where are all the honest,
guys? Where are they? I know they're out
there.
I don't see them in the conversation probably
because Twitter's suppressing them all.
This is terrifying. This is exactly what it
looks like, and y'all know it.
Now here, by the way, was a next
day
fact sheet follow-up.
Basically, reiterating all the same information, but adds
a few more additional points. Immediate action will
be taken by the Department of Justice to
protect law and order.
Okay. Well, that already exists. I didn't need
the right to say that. Quell pro Hamas,
vandalism, intimidation. Here we go again.
Somebody wanna show me these pro Hamas, vandals?
Right? If you're talking about Palestinian protests, it's
not the same thing. And I don't I
don't see really any examples of them doing
anything other than standing there while Zionists throw
things at them. But either way, investigate and
punish anti Jewish racism and leftist anti American
colleges.
Oh, so only those though. So if it
happens on a right wing college, that's not
a big deal?
And why would you even write that? It's
just so transparent
because they know the only way they're gonna
get Republicans to fight for something that is
anti free speech is to pretend it's only
about the left. That's how easy they think
you are to play. Please, God, prove them
wrong.
Because it's very clear what they're saying there.
Colleges
to punish anti racism
is protected under your constitutional rights.
Even if it's actually not racism at the
time because they're making it about Palestinian flags.
Doesn't
matter. You have a right to feel and
think and say what you want in any
context, guys. That's supposed to be what we
believe,
but they're telling you it's not true if
it applies to Israel.
The order demands the removal of resident aliens
who violate our laws. I thought that was
interesting, by the way. Because technically, what we're
talking about are people who are here legally,
right, resident, permanent residents, who are just don't
just don't yet have the full citizenship,
who they say violate our laws. Okay, well,
I get that is one of the only
points in this that even seems like it
might like the idea is, well, you broke
the law, so, yeah, then you then
accountability, right? But deportation?
Because you violated our laws? Okay. Well, if
it's like murder, that might not be hard
to wrap your mind around. But let's just
say you run a stop sign. Okay. Well,
that seems a little far in the other
way. That seems silly. Right? Okay. Let's find
something in the middle. Let's say you punch
somebody.
Now you're gonna get deported because you violated
our laws. Well, how much you wanna bet
it has to do with very specific types
of laws. In fact, laws that are protected
under the constitution.
Well, either way you look at it, it's
a very weird thing to lay out. Because
you know as well as I, they're not
gonna start deporting people for violating laws unless
that's the context for what you would do
with anybody.
Like, because you realize these are people who
have the right to be here under you
know, legally, whether they're citizens or not.
That means, as we're gonna get to in
a second, that you are protected under the
constitution despite all these
screaming, uninformed people that think they know what
they're talking about that very much do not.
Yes. The constitution applies even in most cases
to people here illegally.
I'll show it to you yet again. I've
gone over this a 1000 times in the
past.
The reason that's important is because what they're
trying to make this out to be is
that we can just kick people out of
the country just because they're not full citizens
if they say bad things about Israel. And
that's what they're laying out for you. But
be clear,
they've carved out multiple points that apply to
you too.
Celebrating Hamas' mass rape. You know, I have
to reiterate the propaganda because that's what they're
being paid for. Then it says, he moved
the American embassy to Israel to Jerusalem. These
are his promises kept.
He literally outlines things that are illegal. Now
if you don't remember this point, the reality
is simple, guys, that under the fake two
state solution that they pretend they still want,
well, Jerusalem is supposed to be the divided
capital of that agreement.
They all agreed to it. They just keep
pretending like Hamas never let it happen even
though we've now proven 50,000 times over that
Israel was on the hook for making sure
it never happened. That's what we just showed
you. Funding Hamas, the group they pretended they
were fighting to stop it. What they do?
They fund the worst people that they pretend
they're fighting and then blame it on it's
it's it's incredible how much evidence we have.
Their former prime minister said it on the
record, but we go, woah. Maybe it's maybe
it's racist.
The point is that he's literally telling you
the fact that the US government just decided
unilaterally to ignore that agreement. A international agreement
is his promise.
Well, no. It's a promise to a foreign
government at the expense of everybody else. Also,
you don't have the authority to do that.
But, you know, promise is kept, though. Well,
yeah. So he's writing executive order aimed at
going, look, Israel. Look what I'm doing for
you.
Isn't that weird? Why would he write this
aimed at them if this is about you?
I think that's saying something very clear, don't
you?
He established the Abraham Accords. No. He didn't,
though. It's all a big game. As Trump
as did Robert calls it the steal of
the century or this fake two state solution
plan, which overlaps the Abraham Accords. The point
is this is about forcing
countries in the Middle East to to normalize
with Israel. Well, they're they're which usually amounts
to putting a fake puppet in place, which
will do that.
Their peoples do not support this. Ask Egypt.
So it's just an illusion, guys. It's about
forcing people into political positions that benefit them
at the expense of everybody else,
as usual. And it says, now president Trump
has promised the federal government will protect the
rights of our Jewish citizens.
Why does that need to be stated? Don't
you already technically have to protect the rights
of everybody?
I guess you protect them more. I mean,
how else do you read that? If they
right now protect the rights of Americans, that's
what their job is, why would they go,
we'll promise to do it for this group
especially?
Well, you damn well know why. And it's
not about Jewish people if you've been following
along. My promise to Jewish Americans with this
is with your vote. I will be your
defender, your protector, and the best friend that
you've ever had.
Aggressively enforce the law, he says.
No. I prefer just enforcing it, you know,
aggressively. It says law protect public order
and prosecute antisemitic crimes. Oh, let's just shove
that one in there. What's an antisemitic crime?
I will issue clear orders to my attorney
general who says to aggressively prosecute terroristic threats,
arson, vandalism, violence against American Jews. Okay. Well,
let's just talk about arson, vandalism. You know
how many examples we've already seen of Zionist
being caught doing that? Are you gonna go
after them too? How much you wanna bet
not? Or the idea that what's a terroristic
threat?
Well, if you're if you're getting into the
level of of threatening violence, well, there's already
crimes for that. There's laws for that. Terroristic
threats, well, you know what they're talking about.
Are you gonna if you say from the
river to the sea, well, you're a terrorist.
If Israel says from the river to the
sea, you're fighting for your freedom.
Follow along.
Now doctor Simon Godek, thank you that there
are some people out there that are in
the republican side of this that are willing
to be honest about it. And he says,
why do you tolerate Trump gutting the first
amendment
just to shield 1 small powerful minority from
criticism?
You either stand for the first amendment in
full or you stand for tyranny,
which plenty of supporters, even of him, didn't
like because it bristles them because they make
that makes them feel like a hypocrite. You
know why? Because they're being hypocrites.
This person says, are they citizens?
Simon says, well, and he's right by the
way. The first amendment protects everyone in the
United States.
Citizens,
green card holders,
even visitors.
Free speech isn't a privilege. It's a fundamental
right.
No. It doesn't.
People are so willfully ignorant. It's disgusting. Now,
guys, it you would take this moron half
a second. I I shouldn't do that. It
would take this guy half a second to
just look into it. Now, the reality is
that doesn't work for the narrative,
and they don't want that to be the
case. But it is the case, so too
bad. But realize that, like, for the
100 mile
non cons what do they call it? The
100 mile no constitution zone around the United
States, which is easy to look up. I
mean, if they can make an entire state
of Maine exist in a non constitutional zone
because the border, then they are already showing
you that they don't they that they don't
have the right to do that. These are
inherent god given rights. They're inalienable.
The point is, whether they wrote them down
or not, they existed was the way they
framed that. Now they love to pretend like
they can dole these things out and change
them because they decide. They're slowly taking things
away from you like with this action for
Israel.
Let me prove what he's saying here. Now,
hear it again.
The main point being, free speech is not
a privilege. It is a fundamental
universal right.
That's what Americans believe anyway, at least that's
the foundation of this that now many people
in the current political two party illusion dynamic
have been lost in that.
But let's look at it. Well, first, I'm
sorry, Craig Mokayber saying the same thing, then
I'll show you the actual data on it.
The the first amendment of the US constitution
applies to noncitizens
who are lawfully within the country, including students.
That would be like Visa card, res permanent
residence, which is what they're pointing out right
now. And the US is also
bound by its obligations to protect their rights
to free speech and assembly under the international
convention on civil and political rights. So it
goes well beyond even just the first amendment
in this country.
Any assault on these rights is an act
of oppression and a breach of US
and international law.
Pro
protesting
apartheid
and genocide
by an oppressive foreign regime is not a
crime. That's what they're criminalizing right now for
Israel at your expense.
It is a moral imperative and a legal
right. Israel, its proxies, and its captured and
corrupted agents in the US government are driving
the US step by step towards fascism.
They must be stopped now before it's too
late. Now, obviously, that going that direction benefits
Israel, but it also benefits the long term
agenda, which is the complete collapse of this
country for their agenda.
Which by the way, if you really don't
know that by now, they're, like, proudly having
conversations about that. And why you don't think
Tom Cotton had seg Seth, Pam Bond, they
don't know that? They're Zionists. They know that.
So they're actively working towards a point which
means the destruction of this country if you
just listen to Zionists.
And you're being plugged. America first.
No. You cannot be if you believe in
what they believe.
Here is just a simple question, and we've
gone over this in-depth. You can look if
you just type this in, like, even just
right here, you'll find
numerous different, like, New York School of Law,
you know, points that'll talk about this. The
simple reality is the First Amendment of the
Constitution
protects the freedoms of speech for everyone within
the United States, regardless of citizenship status.
However, there's obviously limitations and nuances. Now the
first point is undocumented immigrants and visitors,
non citizens,
including undocumented immigrants and visitors are protected under
the first amendment while they're in the United
States. Now the one of the overlapping points
is whether somebody's illegally
here. That's for the point I made before.
Now that's a that's a that's an important
caveat because there's it it's debatable. But the
supreme court has ruled more than once that
these things still apply to people who are
it's it's the way this works. If we're
under the mind, which we're supposed to be,
these are inherent.
It doesn't matter whether you're American or not.
It's an inherent right for everybody. Now that
doesn't alleviate the you're breaking the law, and
you can still be deported, but you have
the right to these same things. That's how
this works.
The fact that Americans act like it's some
only American thing and you're not allowed to
have it, that's the supremacist mindset that's been
bleeding into us for a long time, whether
through Zionism or just because our country's been
falling to this kind of mindset for a
long time because it benefits power structures.
That's what the whole idea is first of
all we should begin always remember we want
a state I want a state without a
state I want a non state of society
but if we're forced to live in this
dynamic. I do think the Constitution
is beneficial
to keeping that at bay as best I've
seen the state of society.
That's why they're chipping away at it, both
sides.
And on this point,
don't forget,
I just I think it's the wrong one.
Yeah. No. Sorry. One, Don't forget that Trump
in these different clips, like these 2 are
the important ones for this conversation,
says very clearly
I'll just play them real quick.
Let's see. That ultimately that you know, and
this goes back to 2016, it's not new,
But that you they should close the Internet
and work with Bill Gates because ISIS.
That's not the point. Things have changed since
then. There's a narrative and whatever else. The
point is still then and still to this
day. I'll show you the next one. He
says that that's people will say free speech
because it matters because you're shutting down people's
ability to express themselves.
He says these are stupid people.
You don't just change an opinion like that,
guys. He was claiming to care about free
speech then.
Because we're losing a lot of people because
of the Internet, and we have to do
something. We have to go see Bill Gates
and a lot of different people
that really understand what's happening. We have to
talk to them maybe in certain areas closing
that Internet up in some way. Somebody will
say, oh, freedom of speech. Freedom of speech.
These are foolish people. We have a lot
of foolish peep Think about saying that.
No. It's not foolish. It's literally free speech.
You're literally violating our rights, but it doesn't
matter because that's what he wants.
Same
thing. And then there was this one.
Right? This one is about the flag. The
idea being that we know, as Ron Paul
has argued in front of Congress, as plenty
of others have made the case, the Supreme
Court has roundly ruled whether or not you
agree with it, that's irrelevant,
that it is constitutionally
protected to burn the American flag.
And it makes sense. Right? Because what we're
talking about is your ability to take an
action that has not it's not a crime
in any other context other than they make
it illegal. And that's the authoritarian dynamic we're
talking about. Right?
So if you think you if you don't
recognize that he was said in 2016, he
just said it very recently around the American
flag dynamic, and what that ultimately shows you,
that he doesn't believe in these things, then
I'm worried. I'm worried about what you perceive,
and I'm worried that you can't that either
you don't wanna see it or you won't
allow yourself to see it. Took the American
flag down. They were writing Hamas on the
bell outside of Union State. I remember that
was never verified to be anybody. We that
was somebody wrote that, and we've already caught
Zionist doing that. But it's certainly possible that
somebody wrote that that's pro Palestine.
The point is that they're making it out
to be because that's the only way it
would make sense because Zionists wouldn't no, they
would. They've been caught doing it, but we
don't know. So typical journalism from corporate media.
What does a Donald Trump do
if he takes office to these people on
the street?
Rarely have we seen anything like this, and
I think you should get a 1 year
jail sentence if you do anything to desecrate
the American flag. Now people will say, oh,
it's unconstitutional.
Those are stupid people.
No. It's it's literally unconstitutional.
You're stupid, Trump, for saying that or you're
dishonest. The point is a lot of Republicans
also made that clear. Ron Paul has called
that out more than once.
So anybody out there pretending like you don't
see this,
you've been shown, guys, just like with COVID
19, the same way you'd make fun of
the Democrats for ignoring how obvious the shots
were dangerous, or Trump to this very day,
by the way. You're doing the same thing.
Now here's Michael Tracey simply pointing out that
the the executive already signed. Right? It it
builds upon the 2019 order mandating the so
called IHRA definition. That's that's saying you can't
criticize Zionism.
And, of course, it is applying double standards
to Israel. And now it says violations could
result in criminal prosecution of Americans.
And he highlights the point we just showed
you. That very clearly, session 2 applies to
you and about simply saying things or having
thoughts that they argue are anti Semitic.
Very, very clear what we're seeing. Now Max
Blumenthal
hope overlaps this with the horrifying reality of
the Guantanamo Bay Point.
Today, I'm signing an executive order to instruct
the Department of Defense and Homeland Security to
begin preparing 30,000
a 30,000 person migrant facility at the Guantanamo
Bay.
Right. Overlapping with the idea of deporting people
because they support Hamas, which really they mean
Palestine, but also the deportation conversation with the
border.
And how do you think they're gonna figure
all this out?
Well, you know why. Thrones and biometric scans
and technocracy, it's all literally being done right
now.
Blackmax points points out the precedent for Trump's
order was set by George Bush,
h w,
and Bill Clinton, who detained thousands of Haitians
at Guantanamo during the nineties following the US
backed coup that removed Haitian Haiti's elected leader,
Aristot.
This was Guantanamo in 1991.
So that so now you're just doing exactly
what Bush and Clinton
did. Think about that. That make you that
make you okay with that team sport republicans?
Probably not. You'll probably pretend it's not true.
Now back to the point about Tommy Robinson.
Right? So here you have these people that
are desperately trying to see this fear about
why Muslims are dangerous, and here's Says, there's
no place for this in the 21st century
and shows this Muslim woman in a burqa,
which I showed you earlier,
is actually a Jewish woman in Israel. That's
according to
forward,
the Jewish platform. Literally telling you, no. No.
No. It's not a Muslim. This is a
80 degree day in in in a bit
Sherman
Shurmesh location in Israel. A Jewish woman and
her 2 daughters.
So it doesn't matter. He still has it
up. It still has
almost half a 1000000 views.
So my point is not like we said
earlier, just showing you he's being dishonest. I
said, will you still call this out as
having no place in the 21st century once
you realize it's actually a picture of a
Jewish woman in Israel,
Or will you delete it like we expect?
Well, the point is not the point is
right now on the back of the antisemitism
point. Okay. Wouldn't this be considered antisemitism?
Just because he's confused about which side he's
looking at, doesn't that still well, he just
said that Israeli woman has no place 21st
century.
Oops.
Well, now that you can clearly see that
no one cares, no one's doing it about
it,
it's because it's okay. You're allowed to attack
these groups.
Doesn't matter if it's literally the same thing
over here.
They wouldn't call it out. If they knew
it was in Israel, he wouldn't point to
it. So it shows you that it's not
really about the weird, oppressive thing you're pointing
to. It's about racism.
Simple as that.
Sean says, Trump is about to sign an
executive order saying, you get deported if you
criticize this country, which is not exactly what
it says. But by the way, here is
a study. I just pointed to this earlier.
This is a very real article, and it's
actually this is 2011. It gets worse if
you go further down the line.
Study, harratz, 61% of men don't see forced
sex with acquaintances as rape. Well, yeah, that
lines up with raping people in Israel that
we keep seeing or why they keep rejecting
everyone else raping everybody that's not happening.
Benjamin Netanyahu says, on behalf of the Israel
and Jewish people, I thank Donald Trump for
his executive order to fight antisemitism and support
for terrorism on American campuses.
For his executive order to fight antisemitism
and support for terrorism on American campuses.
That's a funny way to write that. Right?
Because what he's really saying is fight this
and fight
anti semitism. But, yeah, that's that's interesting because
you that's normal. You fight anti semitism and
fight
for and support.
Fight anti semitism
and fight support for terrorism on American campuses.
The way he, like, wants that to read
I'm I'm mean, I'm I'm just kinda being
interested. I'm I'm I don't who knows if
he meant this way? But it's interesting because
what he's actually doing is supporting their support
for what I see as actual terrorism on
these campuses, which is the Zionist racist mentality.
But he goes, thank you, POTUS, for standing
up for truth and justice. Again,
who needs enemies when you got friends like
Netanyahu? Guys, this is a war criminal by
everyone else's account in the world committing a
genocide. And not only is Trump meeting with
him, he's praising him for both his executive
order and, I mean, everything, guys.
That should be that should be embarrassing. And
I simply said, can't keep up with all
this winning.
Make make Israel great again.
Now here's an interesting overlap. This Bet Our
US group,
Zionist activist movement. Let's see what they've got.
10,000 followers. Says join us at the jihad
rally as we assist ICE.
ICE for deportations.
In deportation efforts.
Well, that's interesting. So you've got a Zionist
organization who is assisting
ICE deportations.
So is it actually just about some Mexican
migrants, or are they handpicking
deportation aspects in regard to antisemitism?
I'll let you decide, but that's pretty alarming,
isn't it? And it says, we will document
all attendees at the event who wearing kifas
and masks will be identified.
Thanks to
terror watch.
Monitoring, tracking, and exposing terrorist supporters, hateful acts,
and antisemitism
worldwide.
Gee, Nezher
AI. Yeah. They're using artificial intelligence to track
and monitor Americans
for a Zionist group to get you deported
from the country.
How are you I mean, again, I just
can't every give me these moments where I'm
just, like, blown away.
How in the world any honest conservative cannot
be I mean, you should be running screaming
from this right now. It's it's basically intersecting
with the artificial intelligence technocracy.
I mean, everything. Suppression of your rights,
foreign government influence, all these things we've talked
about, borders.
Everything's coming together, and they're proving that they're
not what they're claiming. But that's not even
where this point goes. First of all, they're
simply saying, we're gonna work with the deportation
dynamic
because they're wearing kifas.
You know,
the Palestinian,
scarf.
Is that a crime? Well, this is our
point, guys. This is what they're they're making
that out to be a terrorist symbol. Trump
and his administration are outlining things like that
as Elon Musk already said. He said this
publicly that if it's a Palestinian flag, it
should be thrown out of the country. They're
saying these things. Now what gets even worse
for the podcast,
the event they're pointing to when they say
this,
it's a vigil
for Hendry Jabb,
the young girl who was murdered by Israel
that everybody is exposed.
They're calling it a jihad rally,
a vigil for this young girl who was
murdered.
So you see what they're calling terrorism? Like,
they're not even hiding this. This is so
aggressively
pro Zionist
that they're just coming right over the top.
You're not allowed to be sad about a
young child being killed because you're a jihad.
It's just clumsy. And they go, that's a
recent rally where we offered beepers.
We're offering reward to anyone who gives
Nardin Kiswani
a beeper today.
This is publicly being stated. Now look, I'm
not gonna pretend that I think they're use
they're giving them beepers that have bombs in
them. But seeing as how Israel did this
and waited 5 years to detonate them, who
knows?
The idea that they're giving beepers to people
because in a rally where they offered beepers
to people to support Palestine,
That's a threat, guys. I don't care how
you frame it. That's not a joke. You
and this if you don't remember the story,
Israel literally
killed mostly civilians, children, women, with a bar
with a campaign where they let beepers,
whatever. They claim they had explosives implanted in
these beepers that went out to Hezbollah and
5 years later
blew them up.
Like, we couldn't pretend that it's possible that,
I don't know, that they ended up going
to the United States on a plane.
Think about how crazy that is. 5 years.
They could have been everywhere in the world.
In fact, they could have been. We wouldn't
even know because some guy in the other
side of the world that his beeper blows
up would never connect it with that story.
Think about how alarming this is. This is
the show we did. Israel's infiltration of US
tech in the light of the Lebanon pager
attack. This is a group who is working
with ICE to deport people from America,
working for Zionist Israel, who is literally spying
on you with artificial intelligence and handing out
beepers to people that support something other than
Zionism.
This is what your government's supporting right now,
Biden and Trump.
It really, really does unnerve me. This is
wild.
And
Zion Tiberias says, Zionists,
shoot 355
bullets at a 5 year old girl, killing
her and her family.
That's been roundly reported by just about everybody
at this point, other than Israel and Matt
Miller, by the way.
Humans, we will hold a vigil for the
child.
Zionists, let's deport the people attending.
He says, I swear, if you can't see
how much these efforts are worse than Nazis,
you're not even paying attention.
I mean, it really is horrifying. Now,
oh, wait. I thought there's more behind that.
Oh, that was the same thing. So they
are just again, the main point is that
we're talking about you working with deportations with
ICE, calling it a jihad rally when it's
for Henry Job,
and spying on Americans and handing out pagers.
No big deal. Right? You'd think your government
would care. Can you imagine if that was
perceived as Palestinians
handing out what they would argue as the
end the suggestion of a bomb
to Zionists or Jews?
Guys, they would lose their minds. This would
be a 247 conversation about how they're terrorists.
But here, in case you forgot,
this was the the anniversary was this was
recently. This was on,
2 days ago.
Last year, on 28th, the Israeli army killed
Heinrichab, a 5 year old girl from Gaza,
along with her family by firing 300 plus
bullets at them. An Israeli army tank killed
the PCRS
teams that came to rescue her,
Killing the paramedics.
This is forensic architecture that did a breakdown
of this.
It's worth it. This is a very important
thread that is I mean, just so it's
clear, by the way, for those who aren't
familiar with this, this story is not up
for debate.
It just it's they just pretend like they're
still investigating. Last time Matt Miller was asked
by Prem Thacker, he's like, well, we're still
looking to do it. Like, 8 months later,
clearly, they don't care.
BBC, I mean, every mainstream article basically called
this out because they had
evidence coming out showing you that they knew
what the where the bolts were fired from,
what bolts they were. They can't deny it,
so they just hide from
it. And your
your placating government ignores it because they're monsters.
Now overlapping this with the point that I
made the other day.
Let's not forget that they've already seen examples
of Americans being caught up in this deportation
dynamic.
That's why this is important. Now just for
a quick side note, it's funny how people
always assume into what they believe their partisan
views are. So in this case, we talked
about this. This is from city of Newark.
Now we went into this more in-depth in
the last show. This is not some part
partisan
game. This very clearly didn't happen. And this
guy is a Puerto Rican veteran.
And, clearly, because he had brown skin, they
just assumed he was a a another migrant,
and they scooped him up. And he was
saying, I I'm a veteran. I'm a military
veteran. And as they say here, suffered the
indignity of having his legitimacy of his military
documentation questioned. Also say they produced no warrant
and basically went after all the brown people
in this restaurant.
As I pointed out the other day, I
was like, well, couldn't you be a German
Swedish immigrant?
You're what you're pretending is this is about
illegal immigration. Right? So why is it not
it's certainly possible. Right? Well, obviously, you know
that it's more likely based on what's going
on, but they're that's they're violating the rules.
There's no warrant, there's good and so the
point was nowhere in there that I say
that I even know this person was that
I then assume because he's a veteran is
a good person. But weirdly enough I got
comments about that going why would you assume
that just because he's a veteran, well I
did assume that didn't even mention that.
The only point I was making is that
it would matter to republicans
that it's a veteran. On top of that,
that it ultimately was an American who got
caught up in it. Those are the only
points that matter. Because everyone seems to only
be able to see through the partisan lens
is they somehow assume that I'm seeking through
some altruistic virtue dynamic. Nope. Nope. I say
what I mean, and I mean what I
say. The point though is that overlapping
that
there Americans who are already getting swept up
in this because I don't think it has
anything to do with going after immigrants or
keeping you safe.
Francesca Albanese points out that Israel has a
track record of violating ceasefire agreements as well
as anything else con concerning international law. So
one of the few honest people in this
conversation. You know why I know that? Because
this is provable. As far back as you
wanna look if you're not a complete moron
or a Zionist influencer. And it says, and
this time is no different, yet its allies
are always ready to blame Palestinians.
Jeremy Scahill pointing out on 29th, this is
yesterday,
more than 80 Palestinians have been killed since
in Gaza since the supposed ceasefire
took hold, which is so embarrassing. It's insulting
that we even keep calling it a ceasefire,
guys. They've been murdering people
continuously.
49 of them were in Rafa alone.
Israel repeatedly violated the agreement, killing dozens of
civilians,
returning to their devastated neighborhoods.
Franchesca Albanese also points out,
as Israel continues to kill Palestinian children from
the river to the sea, and is any
western politician there to be heard or seen?
Al Sarad points out another Haratz article, which
by the way is from the 27th of
this year,
January 27th.
Palestinian family was eating dinner when the IDF
sprayed bullets into their house, killing a 2
year old. And we're gonna come back to
that as the West Bank part of it,
but that's the child we showed you the
other day.
Nobody even cared about this in the west.
Why?
Apparently, because we they've desensitized people to some
Palestinians
are Hamas. That's what they've tricked people into
thinking around the world, or rather the the
leaders of the conversation, whatever that's supposed to
be, the mill the
the the media and the government, they all
I mean, I think it's actually quite the
opposite. I think everybody sees what this really
is, but the power structures don't care. So
they shove the narrative in your face.
But I think most people see this and
are outraged.
I thought the West Bank was not part
of this. Then you get done telling us
that it was only the bad guy Hamas
and it wasn't even all Palestinians. Well, now
you're just jumping into the other Palestinian location.
Not even a false narrative about Hamas.
Anybody confused?
They're just murdering people sitting around the dinner
table. You know what that sounds a lot
like? The fake story they gave you about
what happened on October 7th.
Sitting around the dinner table and they shot
and they killed them. Well, no. That's what
they do every day in Palestine.
Here's another example.
Kate Johnstone, pretty sure the Israeli contractor was
shot exactly because
he was
unarmed civilian.
Israeli contractor working in Gaza
accidentally shot dead by the IDF.
I mean, the willful ignorance around this when
we know they've already shot their own hostages
as I've shown you before, 3 of them,
one of them 15 minutes after the others,
after he spent the whole time going, don't
shoot me, I'm Israeli. And then they coax
him out and they shoot him in the
chest.
2 of them.
This is another example.
Was an unarmed
and dressed in civilian clothing.
And it goes, making it unclear why he
was shot. No. No. That's the point they're
making. That's why he was shot. Because as
we keep getting told from the mouths of
politicians and IDF members that they just kill
whoever's there.
Over and over and over, we've gotten articles
and videos and whistleblowers, and yet we all
act like, well, we're not really sure because
we're sweet. And some people are still so
afraid to be called racist.
The the amount of evidence is be damned,
apparently.
Unbelievable.
Asal Rad from Times of Israel was mistakenly
identified as a threat.
And he goes she says threat equals they
mistakenly identified him as a Palestinian.
Right? This shows how clearly they target Palestinian
civilians.
They thought he was Palestinian. He was in
civilian clothing, was not a threat, so they
killed him. Oops. We thought you were Palestinian.
Military contractor.
Well, Jeremy Scahill points out, more Palestinian captives
have died in Israeli custody.
Hope you know, and remember, these are the
ones being raped and tortured.
In one case, Israelis reportedly told lawyers they
could not speak to their client because he
was in interrogation.
In reality, he had died 6 months prior.
Just the depravity.
It's scary, guys. It really is. It's unnerving
to think that this is not a joke.
It's not some caveat one's side. This is
a whole thing, and that your government is
working with this.
Age 2535
have been killed in Israeli custody amid ongoing
reports of torture. Neither had preexisting health conditions.
I'm gonna come back to this one.
Okay. Abir points out, this is what Palestinians
are returning to, and you've already seen all
these guys. This is what Israel did thinking
they won't return.
I mean, just take a look around this
video. It is the entire area.
It is gone, guys. Palestine, Israel, Gaza is
gone.
Mama Jihadah points out that Netanyahu violated the
ceasefire back on 25th, but every day, actually,
as we can easily prove, but
declares Israel won't allow displaced Gaza to return.
Nobody said a word about that. Even though
it's a violation, even though Hamas just kept
going forward anyway because no one's gonna point
out anything that Israel does wrong. So the
moment they don't fall through, they're gonna go,
see Hamas broke it. Even though the reality
is they've already said, we're not gonna let
it back to the north. That was a
huge part of the deal.
Right now, there's a there's a whole crossing
right now. They're not letting them back.
You don't think they know that? Matt Miller,
Patel, Kirby, or whoever the hell is in
position now? Yeah. They do. Biden, Trump, they
know. Netanyahu knows. They don't care.
Says the agreement clearly says they should allow
this unrestricted
return of 1,000,000 Gazans on day 7th. They
did not. In fact, it got worse because
they shot them as they were trying.
Owen Jones simply points
out, probably the Klompa saying Israel won't allow
them return to the northern part of the
strip until
civilian hostage,
Arbel Yehud is released. Now, by the way,
that's one of the names they mentioned in
conjunction with the Bivas family. So they're playing
on these, which I bet you they know
they're both killed.
But his point is valid, even though I
don't really trust this person at this point.
He says,
so Israel just openly well, I believe Klompas
did, but she's clearly representative of the government,
admits to collective punishment and using 100 of
1000 of civilians as bargaining chips. Right, okay.
So the game where we pretend Hamas is
not Palestine, that's well since gone, right? They're
simply going, no, we won't let them go
back to their territory even though what we're
pretending is we're fighting Hamas and they're not
part of it because
Hamas has not returned a hostage.
Well, what does it have to do with
the Gaza that you're supposed to let back
to the north? That's Hamas, but it's collective
punishment. No matter how you spin it, that's
what it looks like, just like they've been
doing the entire time.
Howard Beckett, look at this, guys. Look at
that big march. Tens of thousands of Palestinians
at the Netzerim corridor in Central Gaza prevented
by Israel forces from returning to the north.
Look at all those people.
As his proof, it was never needed that
occupation is imprisonment.
They just decided not to let them.
Another picture.
Zionist this is Youssef Munier saying, Zionist, look
at this confused
and think we left them nothing to return
to.
Palestinians
know
there
is everything to return to.
That's the difference.
And this is not about the home or
that this is about something far more profound
than that. As I've said before, the resilience
of these people is inspiring.
They're gonna keep going back because that is
their
their destiny, it seems, to continue to fight
for what is theirs.
I mean, at this point, why would they
stop? Like, I just you have to realize
these people know their own history. They know
the rape and torture and pillaging,
the the constant displacement and ethnic cleansing. They
know their houses are gone. What else do
they have to fight for? To give up
and allow yourself to be moved somewhere else?
That to me and clearly to what they're
saying, it would feel like a defeat.
At this point, just their existence and refusal
to be moved is a victory.
Now, I don't mean that in the sense
that that's the way it should have gone.
Like, obviously, this is a complete
ethnic cleansing genocide
where they have been wiped out. But at
this point, if you were in their position,
I mean, just again, the resilience is inspiring,
and they are not gonna stop
in regard to what? Fighting for what is
theirs. Right?
Jeremy Scales showing the same discussion says Trump
is dreaming if he thinks any of us
will go to Egypt or Jordan, which Gaza
is saying this to him. Tens of 1,000
of Palestinians march across the axis asserting their
right of return to northern Gaza.
And they're being shot at, by the way.
There's many examples of this already.
Here's footage of the moment the Israelis fired
on Palestinian people waiting to return to the
north. Right? They don't want that. They don't
want this big example of all these people
together cheering, waving flags. They can't allow that,
so they fire at civilians.
No. Not even a narrative doesn't make sense
of it.
Zionism Observer points out the idea of shot
20 different people in Gaza. This is on
the 26th.
It's been happening pretty much every day. Over
a 100 people in Lebanon on 26th.
That's true too.
Both massacres were to prevent civilians from going
home because at the time on 26th, they
were supposed to be allowed to go back
to Lebanon
in the south. They stopped that too. Israel
was supposed to pull away. They did not.
They never intended to as they already told
you and we already reported
in violation of the terms they agreed to.
But that's how this works. That's what they
always do. Now Saeed Mohammed Rani points out
on Lebanon, 20 is on 26th. 22 unarmed
Lebanese civilians have been murdered by Zionist occupation
forces
who opened fire on unarmed civilians inside Lebanese
territory.
My god. How can this keep happening so
publicly
with 0?
Because the screamers out there on your TeamSport
politics side don't care about any of the
stuff they pretend to care about. Or overseas,
the people that pretend to care about human
rights, which would be the US government projecting
all of this or funding the Israeli genocide.
They don't care about these things.
They care about their control.
They're willing to work with the worst people
on the planet to get their control over
you.
You just can't pretend like this is anything
other than direct violations of everything. The law,
the ceasefire agreement, a 124
who've been injured including 9 children.
Israel commits 11 new violations on Lebanese ceasefire,
January 30th.
Rania Kelleck points out, why is Israel firing
at Lebanese civilians returning to their towns?
It's not about Hezbollah. It's about emptying the
land of its rightful inhabitants like it is
in Syria, like it is in Gaza, like
it is in everywhere else we're trying to
accomplish this. Listen to what Smotrich just told
you.
Israel's goal was to create a buffer zone
inside Lebanon just like they did in Gaza,
which is why it decimated those border villages
in the first place. The return of displaced
civilians undermines that objective. Now realize, they already
had the buffer zone. Israel just moved right
to the front of it and then created
another buffer zone. So it's a buffer zone
to the other buffer zone they already have.
So it's a game.
They take more territory, they move forward, take
more territory. This is occupation. It's colonialism. That's
what they're doing.
The return of the displaced civilians undermines that
objective.
The people of South Lebanon have always resisted
Israel's aggression just as any people would resist
a foreign power seeking to subjugate them. Their
mere presence at the border challenges Israel's dominance
because they refuse to submit. That's why Israel
wants this land emptied and why some even
aspire to settle it with Israeli Jews.
Craig Murray, who's been there, by the way,
documented this from day 1 showing violations of
ceasefire.
Not a Lebanese journalist, a very well respected
UK journalist, but no one cares. It says
expansion,
huge 40 a slip. I pointed this the
other day while White House spokesperson on Israel's
refusal to leave Lebanon. Okay. So the point
is they've already refused to leave.
It says, quote, we are pleased the Israeli
military has begun to withdraw from the central
regions, and we continue to work closely with
our regional partners to finalize
the expansion.
That was the quote. The link's right there.
Now I agree with them. That's not what
they're supposed to say, but that is what
they're doing.
So you can't pretend these 2 are the
same thing. Either they're supposed to pull back
and that was the agreement they pretended they
were all on board with, or they were
planning to expand in Lebanon.
You know what's happening because you can see
it. So stop listening to false narrative, some
some career politicians
left or right, and focus on what you
can prove.
They are the very thing they pretend they're
fighting.
Craig Murray, over a 100 people shot on
the 26th by the Israelis today in Lebanon
with 11 dead. A 12 year old boy
was wounded by Israeli fire standing right next
to one of his team
just before he took this video.
Think how brave this person is for doing
that.
Sai Maha Mirandi points out, this is what
Western media conceals from you. Footage shows his
Zionist forces opening fire on Lebanese civilians as
they try to return to their villages. The
collective west and Zionist colony remain the greatest
burden on humanity.
Just riding around on bikes, opening fire on
people.
I mean, it just it just doesn't stop,
guys. I'm just trying to go through this
to get done here. We're over 4 hours.
The word you're looking for is lied as
all rod says.
Israel lies over and over yet most Western
media outlets still use Israel says to frame
their stories.
IDF said
bomb departments were Hezbollah base, but most of
dead were civilians.
Yeah. That's called lying, guys. Think about the
way you still frame that. How pathetic. And
here is the follow-up.
This is from the BBC report.
Only the people in red were confirmed to
have even a connection to Hezbollah, not even
being a part of Hezbollah.
Every other one in this photo are civilians.
That's mostly children.
Think about that that should be the end
of the conversation.
In any other context, if this was even
tangential to Palestine, people would lose their minds.
But here you have Israel
openly murdering
the vast majority of women and children claiming
that it's all Hezbollah. BBC proves it's not
the case, and we just move forward.
It says the IDF says the overwhelming majority
of these killed in the strike were confirmed
confirmed
to be terror operatives. I think you gotta
love terror operatives.
Terror rape dungeon. Like, they're just such children.
You could just say terrorist. And it said
but the point is when you wanna make
it into something grosser and weird, like, it's
like a bunch of kids at plays. People
are such ridiculous juvenile people. But a BBCI
investigation verified
the identity of 68
of the 73
and uncovered evidence suggesting that 66
were linked
to Hezbollah's military wing. None of those we
identified appear to hold senior rank. The BBC's
World Service also found the other 62 were
civilians.
29 children. Israel murdered 29 Lebanese children,
and nobody cared,
which where we are.
Israel orders thousands of Lebanese not to return
to the border area.
So that so the game was supposed to
be they were gonna move back. Then they
said, no. Now, you have to move back.
So where's this is when the UN steps
up and says, well, that's a violation. They
go, you're racist.
And the US government follows suit.
She says a foreign military has no right
to order people not to return to their
own land and homes.
But they think they can because they've been
doing it in Gaza for 76 years.
Sarah Abdallah,
this is on 24th.
Israel's wiping out entire homes
in South Lebanon. Not military targets, civilian homes.
No ceasefire,
no restraint, just terrorism in broad daylight.
Every day you can prove this.
Here she is on the 25th.
Israel's detonating massive bombs and setting civilian homes
on fire in southern Lebanon in the middle
of the night.
Here she is on the 28th.
Israel's dropping bombs on civilian areas in southern
Lebanon, and she's naming the specifics. Each town
was different, but I'm just trying to go
quick, in the middle of the night. No
military targets, just civilians.
It's all on the
record.
Says, let's be clear. Israel's refusal to withdraw
from Lebanon after the 60 day deadline is
an occupation.
Let's be clear. It was before that. They
were already occupying with Sheba farms in different
aspects of the southern area, but that just
became kind of the norm because of the
buffer zone. But this is just the same
thing. Now she's right. Now they're continuing to
occupy even more land. And let's be clear
on top of that. They told you that
was the plan before this ever started. Remember
we showed you Daniela Weiss and their map
of where the different settlements would go?
It's not that hard to see if you
just have the courage to be honest about
it.
The Lebanese have every right to defend themselves
on their land against invading and occupying forests.
And now here we are back to the
idea of illegal occupation.
It doesn't matter what other justification or context
or narrative you spin around this. Lebanese people
of any kind, shape, or form, whether military
or not, have the legal right to arm
resistance, whether or not they're attacked. So right
this moment, if Lebanese civilians decide to invade
where they're occupying and kill everybody,
that will be legal armed resistance.
Now, if within that act, some of those
people turn out to be civilians, well, they
could be held accountable for that.
Right?
That's how this works. So, overall, I guarantee
you no matter what they do, it's gonna
be called terrorism as they occupy Lebanese territory.
It's not that difficult, guys. It's very simple,
but people just pretend it's complicated.
This says, how many people have has Israel
killed in Lebanon since the ceasefire?
Israeli forces have killed at least 83.
83.
It says, on average, more than one person
every day in Lebanon since the supposed ceasefire.
Hey, just like in Gaza right now. Again,
Israel can kill people every day and it's
called a ceasefire as long as nobody fights
back.
That is so crazy to me.
Even though I know it, it's still crazy.
Now, in the West Bank,
Israel's launched what they call Operation Iron Wall.
Weird how that's not being reported by the
corporate media or the mainstream alternative media. Even
though it's a monumentally
it's a this is a very large conversation
because of how long this has gone on
and because it is a extension
of not just the Gaza genocide. But you
realize this has this has broadened out into
the greater Israel project. You've got ongoing invasions
in Lebanon. You've got an ongoing occupation and
full invasion of Syria. You've got the ongoing
occupation and genocide in Gaza, and you've got
the Egypt element that is still there. A
point that they just told they want all
of this,
and they're actively rolling it out.
And they call it operation iron wall.
It says day 2 of Trump's presidency.
It says it's named for Jabotinsky's
29 essay, the iron wall. Here's an extract.
Zionist colonialize colonialization
can proceed
and develop only
behind an iron wall.
Think about that.
That's what they're quoting,
the very thing they pretend that they're not
doing.
This is my point about why Zionist, they
they they it's about trying to show off
how they can do this to the US
government, even though we we basically admit it
publicly and watch the Millers and the Bidens
and Trumps of the world act like they
don't see it. It's it's a power move.
And they they feel I mean, honestly, I
think it's just about making themselves feel powerful
because truly at the end of the day,
they seem to be pretty weak.
But overall,
Zionist colonization
must either stop or else proceed regardless of
the native population because this is where they've
always been. So, what this is showing you
is their awareness that we can't do this
public anymore because
everybody disagrees with it. So we have to
pretend and begin the long term operation to
call everyone racist for pointing out the obvious
fact.
It needs to happen on behind an iron
wall, which the native population cannot breach.
It's
just disgusting how clear all this is.
And Francesca Albanese says, as long as the
long awaited ceasefire in Gaza took place, Israel's
death machinery escalated its firing in the West
Bank, killing 10 people in Jenin today on
21st.
It if it is not forced to stop,
Israel's genocide of Palestinians will not be confined
to Gaza. And she's right.
This post is from the 29th.
The IDF will shoot children in the West
Bank
so long as there's a sham investigation. That
is the leading newspaper in Israel, Haaretz. Today's
edition of headlines you don't see in western
media. Imagine being able to see such clear
evidence and then having your western media act
like if you say it, you're a racist.
It's just so jarring, isn't it?
Drop site news,
Israel's mass military operation, Janine, continues for the
3rd day in a row. I'll just see
your reports. Israeli forces have shut off the
electricity in the West Bank. Here we go
again.
Now how long until they pretend like it's
all their fault? Like, they like, how when
they pull back and could keep it that
way and go, well, the West Bank is
in control of their own. Well, this is
not Gaza. This is not even an op
open air prison dynamic, but I guarantee they
start clumsily trying to apply the same narratives
because they know the West will lie will
lie for them.
They shut off electricity in the West Bank.
How is that not collective punishment?
Now, this was on the 23rd, by the
way.
Speaking to the WAFA news agency, Al Rub
said the outage extends to the Gene Hospital
and the scene of specialized hospital jeopardizing their
emergency operations, but nobody cares.
Can you I mean, all the narratives, it's
all the same. I just get tired of
saying the same thing. You damn well know
if this was in any other context, they
would be crying foul.
Currently, the hospitals are trying to use the
fuel reserves and bring into more fuel to
keep it on.
Same thing. They're being besieged, guys. That's what
this is.
Ryan Raspiani pointing out Israel's repeating what they
did in Gaza in the West Bank. They
just destroyed a residential building in Jenin refugee
camp right on video.
And you can prove all of this. Again,
this is not Gaza.
This is a very different dynamic like we
said in Lebanon.
More evidence coming out where people seeing this,
and you it's very clear what they're doing.
They just believe they can get away with
it. I mean, why wouldn't they? It's been
over a year.
They've said a lot of things. No one's
gotten in trouble.
Now this is all cuts news network. Israeli
occupation forces continue their wide scale devastation of
homes and infrastructure in Jenin refugee camp for
the 5th day in a row. Now realize
what you're seeing here is not the game
they've not that they play, they're going after
bad guys. They're tearing up roads. They're tearing
down buildings. They just showed you the d
nine bulldozers. They're gonna this is ethnic cleansing.
They're just take they've just decided to go
all the way.
They always have.
This is where you get those videos or
those the evidence and articles we've shown you
in the past where they say we can
legislate anywhere in the world.
Because the point they're making is that we
can take the West Bank, we can go
anywhere. They've made that case in their own
government, Knesset, more than once.
Then you wonder why they're not afraid to
act like they can do this in the
United States.
Here's a heartbreaking video.
This is a family
who is driving in the West Bank.
You know, despite the language, the the the
scary part is it's very reminiscent to just
any other family anywhere else in the world
driving down the road with their kids, listen
to music, and then what what appears to
be them getting bombed and dying
in the West Bank.
Hold on. I gotta make sure I didn't
lose that.
Okay.
Again,
here we go.
Yeah. Same thing.
What in the world?
So frustrating. There it is. Don't need to
explain.
Stupid people.
So that's what we get.
I just there's just it's so there's too
many examples like this.
Trying to find this article for you.
I mean, this has been covered a lot
by Israeli media,
And it's easy to look up, but I'm
just trying to find one that won't be
immediately dismissed by people that
like, this one is the,
let's see. Well, here's just here's just an
example included so we can keep, you know
oh, yeah. I I know what I'll do.
Here here's the article itself
from Middle East monitor.
I'm pretty sure in this, it's pointed to
it somewhere.
Well, come I'll I'll include this for you.
Like, I don't wanna take the time to
search it out because we're wrapping up here.
But this this the point is, it just
because Middle East monitor, of course, people will
pretend it's not true, but very easy to
prove. This is literally them speaking to the
Knesset and the often point they make, and
this is quoting them directly.
That said let that says Israel claims that
it can legislate anywhere in the world, that
it's entitled to violate the sovereignty of foreign
countries, and that is allowed to ignore the
decrees,
directives of international law in any field that
desires.
Netanyahu, other ministers, they've publicly expressed this. Now
they frame it in the idea about the
West Bank, but they state it pretty clearly,
don't they? Then you wonder why they're not
influencing or why they are influencing
groups like the United States through Trump's administration
because they don't feel this stuff applies to
them at all.
Just don't know how much evidence people could
ignore.
UN UN reports that Israeli soldiers have forcibly
expelled 2,000,
2,000 families from Jenin
in the West Bank.
A camp with a population of 22,000.
2,000 families in the West Bank. Where's the
up where's the cry crying foul for that?
Who who's speaking up about this?
Where's Jordan? They were making huge claims about
red lines for the West Bank. No one
seems to care. As he says, Janine had
nothing to do with October 7th. It's about
Palestinians, guys. Linda Mahon points out a soldier
shot on the 25th, a 2 year old
girl in the West Bank.
This is her.
Lila,
killed in the West Bank, shot her in
the head,
3 years old.
These aren't by accident, guys. We showed you
the clip in the beginning. Almost exclusively children
according to that Jewish doctor. Israeli occupation has
noted notified the residents
of Al Naham Village in Bethlehem
of its intentions to demolish all of their
homes and forcibly to place them
displace them.
That's how that's how casually this is happening.
By the way, guys, all of you have
to move. We don't care where. Get out
of the way. We're tearing your homes down.
It's amazing how people will pretend like this
is this can't be true. It happens every
day,
every single day in the West Bank. They're
taking home by home, by territory. All of
it's illegal.
Now they're just doing it in a mass
movement.
As of yesterday,
following the airstrike according to Miriam Barghouti in
Tubas an hour ago until 29th, in which
10 Palestinians were killed in one bombing. The
Israeli army is carrying out a large scale
offensive in Kalquila.
As of now, all districts in north of
the West Bank are under full attack by
the Israeli army.
Operation Iron Wall was started 9 days ago
and expanding and intensifying. Airstrikes and bombs have
become the norm in the West Bank. How
is it possible that that could be going
on with no coverage in the West?
Zionist observer points out, Israel's announced today that
the
IDF will not leave Janine.
See how this works? So now they're permanently
occupying Janine. Guess what? They're also now announcing
they're never leaving Syria.
Yeah. That's what's really happening. This is both
these are statements from the Israeli government, Israel
Katz, the defense minister.
IDF will remain in the summit of
in in in Syria indefinitely. That's what they
just said. They're also reporting publicly that they
will not leave West Bank.
Your governments are cowards if they pretend this
is okay.
Trump, Biden, anybody, left, right, UK, doesn't matter.
Anybody supporting this is not a friend is
is a dishonest person, is a monster, is
part of the villains of today. That's what
we're seeing.
In Syria, same point.
During a visit to the Syrian side about
Hermon today, the war minister said they will
remain there indefinitely.
I told you so just doesn't cut it.
And as this person says, they prove us
right every time. And what's crazy is even
though every time they do what we say,
what we're told are racist for suggesting it'll
never happen, the same people that said that
jump to the next claim and call you
racist for the next one.
IDF sustained Syria indefinitely.
But wait, I thought that was the Al
Qaeda guys there. Oh, I guess they're working
together. Surprise, surprise, because they're the same effing
thing.
US backed Syrian authorities conduct dozens of sectarian
executions.
Khabar Khamesian, Harteilsham,
Al Qaeda killed
204 Syrians in Homs since January,
including 5 women and a child
in, quote, revenge operations and field executions.
That's supposed to be the democracy they were
fighting for. Right? No. I mean, they didn't
even try to phrase force that narrative in.
They just said, hey. Our people are there.
Just shut up, call it democracy. Look the
other way. These are the people that we've
always been telling you are terrorists, but we've
been working with them, and we know it
show it's everything we're talking about. You can't
pretend like the Al Qaeda are their enemy
when we're telling you they're a proxy element.
And then the moment they take control of
Syria, they work with Israel and the United
States.
And he literally congratulates Donald Trump on his
presidency. That's Gulani.
It's just ridiculous what people can pretend is
not happening.
Syrian girl points out an old man standing
up from his home is killed by the
new Syrian government, which you can watch if
you really want to. They shoot him down
in the front steps of his home. Max
Blumenthal says, welcome to Homs under the tyranny
of the majority established by Gilani and his
gulf and NATO backers. The city is now
the site of waves of sectarian murders, calamity
largely ignored by western press, and the human
rights industrial complex.
Homs is for Sunnis, Alawites out. The Syrian
species of the red star flag terrorism are
celebrating the self installation of the Al Qaeda
leader.
It is exactly what everybody claims Israel and
United States are fighting. They are rolling out
and working with everywhere they go the thing
they claim they're fighting. How do we not
see that by now?
Mark El Masian says,
al Muhammad al Joolani,
otherwise known as Al Sharad. So the terrorist.
The literal the guy that was a bounty
on his head right before this has been
declared the president of Syria.
That's not a joke.
The US has rarely backed Al Qaeda army
has now been declared president because democracy.
It's just pathetic.
Now all I want for anybody out there
watching is to have the courage
to simply be able to say this,
to acknowledge it, to have you have the
tools. Don't just repeat what I'm saying. Don't
take the headline. Look in the source material.
Find the actual information. Vet it for yourself
so you know I'm not mistaken, and prove
it to people.
Take me
the partisan game is is it's over. I
mean, I don't know how it's not. I
shouldn't say that because clearly they're still using
it, and the power structure is gonna use
what it wants to. I see I think
more people are seeing through this than ever.
And it's because they're forcing in the very
game and exposing it just like with Israel
and the genocide and everything else because this
is an end game,
Clearly, whether that's because of Zionist prophetic visions
or because it's the technocratic rollout or the
both at the same time. They see this
as an endpoint,
and they are done pretending.
Have the courage to call it out.
Whether it's terrorists they're supporting in Syria or
literally committing genocide all around the world or
pretending to fight for free speech while censoring
your free speech. Stand up.
Find the courage to do what you know
is right.
It's never been a more important time to
do so. Thank you for tuning in today.
I appreciate you all. Continue to support this
platform. We wouldn't exist without you.
I love you guys. Thank you for being
here. As always,
question
everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Let me
let me preface these remarks with I never
never ever believe
Israeli figures.
I've been in the government too long to
know that the Israelis are patent liars.
In their intelligence community, in their propaganda community,
certainly,
and in their leadership,
they are inveterate
liars.