And the kit managed to create the world's
first truly global empire, and it's basically a
secret empire. We do it many ways, but
but but principally,
we identify a country that has resources our
corporations covet like oil, range a huge loan
to that country from the World Bank or
one of its sisters. The money never actually
goes to the country. It goes to our
own corporations to build big infrastructure projects in
that country that help a few very wealthy
people,
but don't benefit the majority of people who
are too poor to buy electricity or have
cars to drive on the highways. And yet
they're left holding a huge debt that they
can't repay.
So we go back at some point and
say, you know, you can't pay your debts.
Give us a pound of flesh. Sell your
oil real cheap to our oil companies.
Vote with us on the next critical UN
vote. Allow us to build a military base
in your backyard.
Something along these lines. And when we fail,
the jackals go in and either overthrow or
assassinate
these leaders.
And if the jackals fail as they did
in in in Iraq, then we send them
the military.
I don't think the failure is capitalism. I
think it's a specific kind of capitalism
that we've developed.
We've created what I consider a mutant
viral form of capitalism.
And this mutant form of capitalism, which I
think is really a predatory form of capitalism,
has created an extremely
unstable, unsustainable,
unjust, and and very, very dangerous world.
I've met a lot of terrorists. I've interviewed
them for books. I've never met one who
wanted to be a terrorist. They're desperate people.
If we wanna get rid of terrorism,
we must get rid of the root causes,
that cancer
that is destroying,
our whole system.
Because I think it's really important that we
understand today, we cannot have homeland security
unless we understand that the whole planet
is our home
As vice president
is a salute to the CIA
and to the intelligence community and to the
military industrial complex.
Their gravy train is gonna continue.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Wednesday, January 29, 2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
Gonna start today on a bit of a
somber note.
For those that have already heard, we had
a death in the family.
Now, this is something we've been we've been
expecting. It's been a long time coming.
Unfortunately, we had an event that I was
gonna be speaking out of Mexico, and I
made the very difficult decision
to decide to stay and be here for
my family. And I it's very difficult because
I'm definitely letting people down by not being,
you know, being where I said I would
be. But, ultimately,
I think as we all
at least, you know, it's something we talk
about a lot in this show and and
the the community and and the kind of
feeling that we put out that, you know,
family is a very core and very important
part of our lives. And I think most
people, you know, agree with that. And so
it was difficult for me to make that
choice, but it was very important to me
to be here for my family in this
time. And
my grandmother was a very central
pillar
of our family.
She was the moral
foundation
for everything that we are.
She was the background, the backbone for who
I am and what I do on this
show, for why my mother is the person
she was, which is why we are the
way we are in this family. And I
think it's it's difficult to watch something like
that. To be to to
the bottom line is it's important to be
here for something like this and to be
present and to feel everything and experience everything
and be here for my family. But overall,
the bottom line is that I won't be
there at the Mexico event, unfortunately, but I'm
gonna do my best to work as much
as I can while I'm here.
But I wanted to start with something that
I thought was important
that
cherishes her memory to start. And I know
that's maybe not something that everybody watching is
cares about, you know, but it's important to
me. And I wanted to start with something
that
is emotional, but, ultimately, she
wrote some things in a binder that we
didn't find until after the fact. And
it was pretty profound. A lot of different
things that she wrote out about about
my mother, myself, and about what I do.
And I thought it was important to share
that with you because this is, again, somebody
who is
a
foundational part of of everything that I believe.
Like, really, the the the found the backbone
of why I am the way I am
today. And I think you'll see that in
in something that she wrote here. So
and and, you know, for those that
the relationship in our family has always been
very close, and, ultimately, she's somebody who is
was, you know,
the kind of family we talk about on
the show in general, but the the raised
helped raised our both me and my brother
and, you know, really instilled
that kind of mindset in in our family
in general. But this is something she wrote
about the last American vagabond that I thought
you guys would appreciate.
And says,
lift your glasses. A toast is in order.
To the last American vagabond, Ryan.
He broadcast the latest independent news to bring
the latest truth out. He's trying.
Ryan works extremely long hours researching the latest
news.
It adds up to most of the night
and day. He wants to get the truth
in the news out. It's most it's more
important to him than pay.
He hears from people all over the world
who listen to his every broadcast.
They always enjoy the truth about the news.
If not live, then maybe by podcast.
Ryan always searches for the truth. He researches
everything he reports on his show.
He keeps up with the timely topics, the
truth he wants people to know. He urges
viewers to do their own research,
not just take to his word.
If they take all the mainstream view media's
views, they will all be the same. It's
absurd.
Question everything is one of his favorite sayings.
Don't take his word. He really means it.
People need to think for themselves.
They need to learn to do their own
bit.
Brian, you are a caring, decent man.
To take your place, there could be no
other.
You have come a long way on your
road to success,
and I'm proud to be your grandmother.
Now she also, had some other things that
I wanted to share that I thought you
guys would think were were interesting.
This was something that she wrote that
it's funny that this is something that she
you'll you'll get a very inter a very
in-depth sense of who she was and and
how insightful she was and different things that
she thought. And some of the I bet
you something says in here that somebody might
even disagree with.
And it says, where has where has our
wonderful country gone?
I hate to think of
hate to think of it that way. But
when our freedom, liberty, and free speech aren't
there, a fair a far different country comes
into mind, I'd say.
Our founding fathers tried so hard
to get all the rules just right so
the following generations of Americans would have freedom
and liberty and not have to fight.
When I grew up in the forties fifties,
people had to work hard, but we were
happier then. We were good neighbors and all
helped each other. We did not wait for
a check the government would send.
We had good school teachers then and learned
what was right and wrong. They taught us
the basic subjects we needed to make a
good American knowledgeable and strong.
Today, the politicians are changing the rules. We
no longer have the freedoms we had. Seems
the government wants their new rules taught. Things
are going from good to bad.
Some people don't want to work anymore. They
have become really dependent and lazy.
They figure, why should I work when the
government pays them not to? It's crazy.
The teachers don't teach the basics anymore.
They want to impose the government rules.
Teaching CRT and telling the students they need
to change. They really are not teachers. They're
government fools.
We need to get back to the old
kind of world when life was good and
people earned their own living.
When people had respect for others and tried
to keep by helped tried to help by
giving.
Our freedom
our freedom fathers authored the declaration of independence.
They had
they had the right ideas for a democracy
for all. If only we would get back
to that original declaration, the country could refocus
and stand tall.
It's
obviously, if you guys have heard me speak
in the past, you know, she's somebody who's
very very,
very much aware of the 2 party illusion
as much as she definitely had her standing
in different things, and we had good conversations
about it.
But it's it's amazing to think of that,
to watch somebody who could see the change,
the the decline.
Right? The ebb and the the the
the ebb and flow of the kind of
political back and forth of all the nonsense,
and she just has to sit there and
watch it watch it pass.
Now I'll I'll leave well, I will I
won't go through this all. I just I
wanna I will get into everything, but I
think one thing I wanted to share
was this I've I've think I've played this
I've showed this on the show before. This
was something that she made for me. This
was her version and her binder that I
didn't know she had. And this is the
picture of myself and my grandfather who passed
a while ago and and her my graduation.
And it's the speech that I gave while
speaking,
while,
at the at graduation.
And, maybe I'll just I mean, I'll I'll
read this. Why not? Since I have it
out. And then I'll add a bunch of
other quotes that she'd written out that I
just thought were interesting just to give you
more insight of kind of the person she
was. The kind of things that you might
expect, some of them you heard, like, when
the people fear the government, there's tyranny. When
the government fears the people, there's liberty. Things
like that, it's kind of the person she
was. A government big enough to give you
everything you want is strong enough to take
everything you have.
You wonder where I get the mindset that
I do.
Now this I'll I'll finish on this, and
then we can get into some of the
important stuff today.
And this is this is what this is,
you know, again, this is a speech I
gave graduating high school. And I've I've talked
about briefly in the past as I went
through my own trials in high school, almost
dropping out entirely with my own issues with
abuse and different things, and ultimately came back
to graduate, giving the speech and, you know,
at at grad at closing graduation and just
very, very proud of that. And she's and
this is something that she was proud of
me for, for for accomplishing and and framed
this and and so and wanted to be
something that I remember.
And as I wrote this,
2001,
I've had quite the experience here at Casa.
Learned many lessons. Made mistakes. The funny thing
is the mistake I regret the most is
not appreciating the time I had here until
it was almost gone. And now I wish
I had all that back
To just be new, little and coming freshman
again with all the dreams in the world,
excited about all the adventures to come, with
such hope in their eyes, with enthusiasm,
I tell myself there are so many things
I would do different if I just had
the chance, but I don't, and I can't.
What I can do is make sure not
to make that mistake again. If I could
pick one thought that would stick with all
of you throughout the experience to come, it'd
be to it would be to point and
simply live in the moment. Live each and
every day as if it was your last,
you see, because the moment you begin to
take everything for granted is the moment when
it will pass you by. You don't want
your entire life to pass you by simply
because you're always looking ahead for the next
opportunity,
missing the wonders and memories to be had
right in front of you. Although we are
all sad to be leaving our beloved high
school memories in the past, this was merely
a stepping stone in our lives and where
we realize it whether we realize it or
not, our lives begin today, not end. We
have everything ahead of us. Everyone everyone will
be going their separate ways, beginning their separate
goals. With every class that graduates from this
school, people always ask themselves one question. How
can I make a difference?
I ask you now, go out and make
a difference. Do something so that when people
look back on this class, they say there's
a class that truly changed the world.
Obviously, very, you know, lofty and idealistic,
naive even. But what's interesting about it is
that it's something that I live with to
this very day.
Doesn't feel so naive when we're really
making differences, when we're changing people's lives, when
we're discussing things that I think truly have
an impact.
But, really, it's funny how something like that
can you know, even myself looking at it.
You know? Some kids speaking in front of
much high school kids about how we're gonna
go out there and change the world. You
know? It's I would call that naive.
But at what point does it suddenly no
longer become naive? At what point if you
just keep doing that and keep trying and
keep instilling these things in other people and
guiding that, you know, the kind of,
what's the the pay it forward kind of
mindset?
And then things start to happen and people
do start changing and things are having a
positive effect. Well, at one point, you know,
maybe it would never was is a way
to think about it. But, anyway,
let's get started with some important stuff today,
guys. Thank you for bearing with me. I
think I just I wanted to do that
for myself more than anybody. I hope somebody
got something out of that. And I think
it's important to to realize where
who we are really comes from. And it's
not just your family, but it's everybody around
you, everybody that influences you, including all of
you here.
But I wanna talk about one thing, basically,
one general thing today that I think is
important that goes through a lot. And I'll
tell you, I I I've been, as you
guys know, I've been, you know,
even before a lot of this, there's a
lot pulling my attention away. And over the
last so many days, I'm sure there's plenty
of things right now that I'm a prob
probably even missing.
But I even then still pulled off a
lot of stuff that I wanna get to,
and I'm gonna do my best. I can't
promise when the next you know, I'm I'm
do my best to get a show out
tomorrow. I just don't know exactly what's gonna
happen day to day. My point though is
a lot of the stuff tomorrow, like the
foreign policy stuff around the ceasefire, for example,
I had to pull a lot of that
off today just because I think it's important
to get focused on, you know, something that
really stood out to me. But on the
show the last show I did, 5 hours
of it. In in fact, there's a lot
of important things in that that really still
holds true to this very moment on what
are going on there. Sadly, a lot of
the things that we could go over re
just to reiterate from the last show, you
know, the lies around the ceasefire, the the
Beebas family, all these things are very still
you know, very in the focal point of
the illusion of it all, and we'll go
through more of that. But today, ultimately, this
kind of overarching point of the
how these things kind of both the foreign
policy aspect, the technocracy aspect of it, the,
you know, the smaller points within it, the
the DARPA financial aspect, the Visa partnering with
Twitter, all these different things are continuing to
build into something much more alarming that, I
mean, already is alarming, but it is becoming
more and more transparent the more these things
develop.
Overlapping that
with the Stargate program, the mRNA dynamic, I
mean, all these things are exactly what we're
we've been warning about. I mean, it's I
hate to say and I told you so
kinda thing, but that's exactly what we're getting
at, guys. This is the concern we've always
been laying out. You now bring that together
with this antisemitism
executive order that has yet it's hasn't officially
happened.
But I think it's obvious. I've just already
been floated. It's been discussed. It's being covered
by everybody. It's being funded very clearly by
the people that we've been telling you where
the funds are coming from. This is an
obvious objective that's been Trump's been pushing this
since his last administration.
So we wanna go over where this is
gonna go and what this means and how
these things kinda come together. How exactly do
you think they're going to be finding
out? Who exactly is I mean, it's the
same conversation as the immigration border conversation
with digital technology.
That's how this is gonna work. And so
this very clearly is a means to an
end to rationalize, to justify where this is
going, but using something that they know you'll
care about. And in many cases, we should
care about.
But it's very
dystopian,
and I think it's very obvious how this
is building together. Now there are a few
other points that if we have time, we'll
get to I mean, just to quickly you
know, stuff we can get to tomorrow or
the next day, but just blatant lies, blatant
misrepresentation.
Like, for example, this absurd condom Gaza story,
which is just flatly false. I mean, it's
it's it's incredible the kind of misinformation
that's not just getting pushed through their own,
White House spokesperson,
but the fact and and Doge being allegedly
responsible. But the idea being that it's being
parroted through all the new media, who right
now with another story is gonna be allegedly
the ones that are ending up in the
White House press pre press house excuse me.
White House press briefings,
which, in a interesting way, is something that
we would like to see other than corporate
media. But if it's just the new fake,
intimate media that's the new corporate media, then
it's just another illusion. And that's what a
lot of this stuff is. But we'll have
to wait and see how it plays out.
Right? If somebody, all of a sudden, we
get a very multifaceted
all over the, you know, nonpartisan
grouping of people, then we would say something
might be changing in a positive direction. But
when they just say podcast and so on
and we get the sense it's gonna be
the people that are parroting exactly what they're
told to say, which is what we're all
seeing, then it's gonna be the same difference
with a little bit different flavor.
Yeah. I'm pessimistic when it comes to how
these things work, but we have a right
to be. The precedents are there. But I
hold out hope for the positive change.
But the problem here is that we can
see that or, for example, the the, what's
the other one? There's a whole bunch of
things I have at the end that are
all just, like, blatant or, like, like, I
think I might have this in the beginning
part.
Well, like, Elon Musk and the $1,000,000 giveaway
point. I think that would become either today
one of the next shows. I moved a
lot around today,
Where it turns out that he lied about
that and is now being he's getting illegal
trouble for it. Remember when they said, we're
gonna give away $1,000,000 to people if you
come basically bribing people to come vote, which
is what we told you they were after
they just got done accusing the side of
doing? It turns out it wasn't so random,
even though he literally said randomly chosen in
the tweets he shared. Now they're telling a
court of law that it wasn't random, and
it wasn't actually a giveaway. We chose them
to represent our pack, but that's not what
everybody was told who were thought they were
entering into a random raffle. So we're being
lied to everywhere. And it seems that most
honest people are beginning to have the courage
to call that out. But there's a lot
more dishonest people than we realize that are
immersed in all of this, who are benefiting
wildly from this fake dynamic, that Twitter seems
to be this
general engine of it all.
It's pretty interesting.
But as I we'll get to it today,
if if not the end of the day,
tomorrow, but today mainly over this main point
from how this works with the social engineering
dynamic, how they're using the the immigration overlap,
the antisemitism
bill, and then how that is overlapping already
with what I see coming. And this the
latter part will be my opinion for whether
it happens coming in the future or not,
but not whether or not it has happened.
Which is ADL and other groups specifically faking
extremist marches, faking extremist events, faking antisemitism
events, in order to rationalize
exactly what we're seeing. And how that then
all comes together. And we're gonna I'm gonna
paint a very clear picture, I think, today
of how these things have been used in
the past from the ADL to your government
to the base to the Odwaffen division to
the Azov movement. These are fake entities that
are being used. Patriot front. Guys, we're being
played in a very, very clear way. Or
Terragram.
Maybe you didn't hear about that one. It's
a cutoff of the same entities and this
all ties back to Israel, US, CIA funding.
It's not hard to see. And then what
did we just recently talk about? The CIA
telling you, oh, no. Al Qaeda's pumping into
the country. Possibly biological. They're starting the fires
in LA. And who's fanning that? No pun
intended. Donald Trump saying we need the CIA.
Suddenly, the CIA is telling you the bio
lab attack and they're giving interviews and apparently,
we're gonna be saved by the sea. I
mean, how is anybody falling for this?
Especially
Republicans.
I just it's it's it's kind of it's
flabbergasting.
It really is. I just don't get it.
But let's start off with the just highlighting
this show.
Because I really want you guys to look
into this more because I I'm telling you
guys, and I've been calling this for a
year, they're going to use this family and
it's gonna make me sick. And I'm gonna
have to, just like with the rape conversation,
one of the few who has the courage
to stand there and call it out while
it's happening. And there's a lot. I only
say a few because there's obviously been a
majority of people that were terrified to talk
about it, not lying about it. But there
was a huge portion of people that were
honest enough to call that out. And it
was hard, guys.
What a terrible thing to have to talk
about, to tell you that you're lying to
us about women being raped. And they were,
guys. They were lying. And we know they're
lying. And they're lying to this very day.
And this, they're talking about the Beebas family
and how these children are you know, they're
basically the father admitted claimed, rather, to be
as accurate as possible on a video that
they were killed by the IDF. And every
single other video like this we've gotten from
hostages have continued to back up what they
said while they were there. That point is,
that means you wouldn't argue that by default
that they must be being forced to say
it if every other one of them has
come back and still made the said the
same thing. And they have.
So the reality would be the evidence leans
in the direction of this is clearly what
happened. On top of the fact that we
have other hostages who have already said this
is what happened, other news reports who have
had to cover this is what happened, and
it turns out that the IDF is even
aware that this has happened and they've already
been trying to hide it. Now
this is all developed recently.
Right? There's a lot of this. Or, for
example, the woman that was supposedly the the
central pillar of the rape story with her
with her gray pants with the blood. As
we've been telling you, they were lying about
that. But it turns out, they had the
video that could prove they knew she wasn't
raped from the very beginning.
Now it's hard to say whether the family
was aware of that lie or whether or
whether it just went along with it when
Israel pushed it, but they knew, guys. They
knew that she cut her ankle and her
wrist, and she was sitting in the truck
and it made her plant pants bloody. She's
now one of the people that got released.
So she's out.
She she was not raped, guys, and we've
been lied to from day 1. And all
of this continues to build and nobody still
stops it. Now, I mean, that that story
I just can't not get frustrated about. But
we'll get more into the the the it's
important though to understand this because the Israel
part of this is a central reality of
what's happening in our country right now.
I still frankly think that most everybody knows
that right now, which is crazy to me.
I've never really been in a position where
we're already, like, we're on the side of
it in my mind where everybody already sees
it.
But it's just nothing's changing and so we're
all confused. It's like all it really shows
you is that we don't live in the
world we think we do. When it really
comes down to it, they don't care at
all what we think.
And now if they're recognizing no one's doing
anything, they're just gonna keep going. Because they
know we see it, they know we see
them, they know we see what they really
are, but we're not stopping them, and we
don't have a power to make them remove
so they just keep going. Now I'm not
calling for violence, guys, but the reality is
that we need to think about another way
to change this. If we can see that
so clearly. If we can watch the Millers
and the Patels and the Kirbys
knowingly
continue to ignore re job and all the
rest of the evidence they know they're hiding
from. The starvation tactics, the bombings, everything. And
then go on to allow Israel to influence
and infiltrate and populate all sorts of manipulations
in this country.
All of them, left and right. That's the
reality of where we're at right now and
it's a terrifying thing. But we cannot just
keep letting this drift forward.
Now the ceasefire part of it was a
huge part. Right? We know that they've been
violating this from the very moment it started,
just like with Lebanon. And the same thing.
And they just don't care. Every day, they
keep killing children. They keep bombing. Starvation. Lebanon,
same thing. And they haven't even pulled out
of Lebanon. That was supposed to happen. Nobody
says a word.
Where are all the supposed rules based order?
Because it doesn't exist right now.
That's terrifying, isn't it?
But the Stargate operation is just Warp Speed
2.0. So for those still trying to pretend
that Donald Trump is somehow it's not what
you it's you're being lied to, it's rolling
out in front of you, it's time to
be an adult about this and start acknowledging
what's happening in front of us. And so
watch this 5 hour show if you wanna
get through all the information within it. I
think it's all very important. It's not some
5 hour long conversation about one point. It's
a 5 hour conversation with about 5 days
worth of content in it. So check it
out. I really hope you'll get something out
of
it. But so on oh, but here's the
clip I shared to start. The reason I
wanted to play that, it's just the classic,
you know, confessions of an economic hit band,
guys. This is the reality that goes well
before the technocratic age.
Simply pointing out that this is how they've
abused these situations. And I played that clip
before of the,
you know, it's basically about the US government
maintaining its preeminence at all costs over everybody,
including you. Your your interest, it's about their
success over the circumstance.
You don't matter. They don't nothing matters other
than that control. We've seen this roundly proven
over the years, and we still debate whether
this is what they are or not. So
in this case, we have people who have
admitted this to us. And we go back
to people like Smedley Butler, for crying out
loud, who tell us, it's a racket, guys.
We're being played. War is a racket is
a famous book written by Smedley Butler from
the US military. Goes back to the forties.
How many times can we be told? In
this case, it's about them abusing the situation
to the point to where it's a very
predatory
capitalism. Now we're seeing that basically become fascistic
tech technocracy.
It's all blending together.
But it's a good thing to understand. And
then I also can play the clip from
Decentered News just kinda flashing back to RFK
Jr openly telling you that Vance, JD Vance,
is basically the CIA.
That this is don't want to be a
boon for the CIA.
But, you know,
well, I guess in case somebody just happened
to tune in, I'll play it real. It's
only 40 seconds. Pick as vice president
is a salute to the CIA
and to the intelligence community and to the
military industrial complex,
their gravy train is gonna continue.
Well yeah. And now what they're all telling
you, the CIA is needs to be pulled
in. Like, imagine that. Imagine
starting an mRNA platform program and then leaning
in with the OpenAI, Sam Altman AI, and
saying he's the leading guy in AI while
Elon Musk is somewhere over in the corner.
How does that make sense? Or this,
and literally rolling into or RFK for that
matter with an mRNA platform and RFK Jordan
Junior in the corner. Right? Or this guy
telling you the CIA killed my father, and
then Trump comes out and goes, we need
to work with the CIA. And he's the
CIA's guy.
And none of it lines up, guys. So
if you somehow wanna pretend like you have
the the secret qanon inside word when it's
just a bunch of guesses,
you don't know any more than anybody else
what's actually going on around these people unless
you're in that inner circle.
All you do know is that nothing makes
any sense. And that should make you pretty
damn uncomfortable.
Max Blumenthal. Now one opening point I wanna
make sure you saw was that Ali, Ali
Budhamoff from Electronic Intifada has been released.
Now he wrote Max put this out on
the 28th. It was yesterday. It seems Israeli
assets in Switzerland not only cooperated or excuse
me, co opted the security minister who ordered
Abunemaz arrest, they convinced him to jail him,
Ali,
on the the basis of his factual reporting
exposing Israel's crimes
on October 7th.
So the same thing. This is the kind
of the level of infiltration
of the Zionist extremist government.
Not only Jews or only Israelis, but the
Zionist Israeli government who has co opted both
Judaism and regard Israel as well as the
Israeli state, but also Christianity and also the
US government and, you know, a lot of
other things. So you could pretend it's about
one thing if you want, but that'd be
your that'd be your
willful ignorance, if you will.
The point though is that this is the
kind of infiltration the extremist Zionist government is
do is carrying out all around the world.
And now you have somebody like Ollie who's
been covering this provably,
factually for a very long time, getting arrested
simply because he's exposing their crimes.
And he but now he's released. Here's what
he said.
On Monday evening, he was brought to Zurich
Airport in handcuffs, in a small metal cage
inside a windowless prison van, and led all
the way to the plane by police. This
is after 3 days 3 days 2 nights
in a Swiss prison cut off from communication
with the outside world,
with with no charge, apparently, in a 20
in a cell 24 hours a day with
1 cellmate, not even permitted to contact my
family.
How exactly is that legal?
I mean, what what think about wild this
is. This is this was meant to be
a threat, if you want my honest opinion,
which you always do, which I always give.
I mean,
what was the charge? Nothing? Okay. What what
what why wouldn't he be allowed to call
somebody? I mean, the there are rights that
exist,
whether you're you know, wherever you are, guys.
If you I mean, I'm pretty sure I
can't speak to my immediate knowledge of what
the dynamics are of, like, your phone call
in in in Switzerland,
but pretty sure there is some level of
process,
not 3 days in the cell with no
contact. That's what happens when the Zionist government
asks.
This is on Saturday in a police interview
in the presence of my lawyer. They accused
him of offending
against Swiss law without ever telling him what
crime he committed
or listing any charges. As far as he
knows, he's not been charged with any crime
whatsoever. He was held in administrative attention. You
know what other place does that? Israel with
children
in Gaza. On Sunday morning, they took me
from my cell for questioning my Swiss defense
intelligence agents without the presence of his lawyer.
That seems to be a crime. And they
again refused to allow him to contact him
or or his his family.
Refused to talk to he refused to talk
to them without his lawyer and told them
to take him back to his cell. During
his imprisonment, he said, I refused every meal
and every cup of tea, they offered me
except the last meal after I knew I
would be going home. I accepted only water,
which is the right of every human being.
All of this was after I was abduct
abducted off the street around 1:30 on Saturday
while on my way to the palace to
Palestine
teach in by undercover agents. Handcuffed, forced into
an unmarked car, and sped straight to the
prison. This crime?
Being a journalist who speaks up for Palestine
and against Israel's genocide and settler colonial savagery,
and those who aid it and abet it.
Came to Switzerland with the invitation of the
Swiss citizens to talk about justice for Palestine,
to talk about accountability for a genocide in
which Switzerland too is complicit. This is why
they're playing the game. But while he was
held into prison like a dangerous criminal before
he even had a chance to say a
word,
Israeli president Isaac Herzog, who declared at the
start of the genocide that there are no
civilians in Gaza, no innocents, received a red
carpet welcome in Davos. You know, the same
Davos that Trump spoke at, the same Davos
that Malay spoke at, the same Davos that
Elon Musk has been trying desperately to be
a part of for years, rolled out the
red carpet.
Desperately to be a part of for years,
rolled out the red carpet. By the way,
Trump's also meeting with
Netanyahu, the first person he's gonna meet with,
or the first person Rubio calls, Netanyahu.
Totally just a coincidence though. Right? Doesn't give
you exactly the indication that anybody with a
brain would be picking up on by now.
Totally not.
Says, and on this very day, Netanyahu freely
travels to Poland to make a mockery of
the Oshawa's com
commemoration despite an outstanding ICC warrant.
I mean, the bottom line is, guys, this
is exactly what we experience
as
a as, you know, humanity. Guys, if you're
dealing with something that has the kind of
like, what we're talking about is a Zionist
entity
that is without question,
influencing, exerting its very devious,
sinister control over powerful people that are compromised.
Like, I don't really understand how we could
make sense of this as just people that
wanna go along with this. Everything they do
undermines their own interests. The only way you
make sense of that is somebody's being challenged.
They're being compromised, threatened, blackmailed,
whatever.
Same thing I say about the US government.
There's no logical reason you could give me
that would make sense of why Biden would
destroy literally everything he pretended. Like, I don't
believe they cared about any of the stuff
they're putting forward.
But at the very least, they wanted you
to think they did.
And what he did was destroy all of
that, even Trump. Trump right now is throwing
away a huge amount of support from his
own base because he's supporting a genocide that
half of them recognize.
You don't think they could do it a
little bit more tactfully? A little bit more,
like, sneaky and underhanded? No. They're coming out
right over the top and slapping you in
the face with it. Why would they do
that?
Because somebody's making that happen. Seems to me
a desperate Zionist entity that is drowning in
its own crimes and is trying to throw
everything at the end of the kitchen sink
at you right now.
But I'm glad he's free. He deserves to
be free because he's doing amazing work, and
he's being charged for being a journalist.
Which your government seems to be completely okay
with, pretty much wherever you are, maybe except
for Yemen.
In this case, I wanna start with this
clip I thought was interesting. And this makes
a broader point about the 2 party illusion.
And also a general point that I keep
making about what I think they're doing to
you right now.
Now,
it's important to think about how, in any
case
like, let's just say this was a all
that what you're gonna see is a half
measure that I think exposes the 2 party
illusion,
but also is a
when I say it's a half measure, it's
because he's basically not giving you the answer
by trying to make you think he would,
but can't because he's bound by something. And
so that to me is a half step.
It's an illusion.
But they that's why people wanna go, oh,
he's telling us the truth. They knew it.
But is he, though? Is he actually telling
you anything other than going wink wink, you
know what I'm about to say, and then
letting you fill in the blank,
and in a sense, protecting Joe Biden by
doing so? Whatever you think his logic is,
this is a way to manipulate
you. I'm I feel quite certain about that.
Pull up the Nord Stream pipeline.
I don't wanna get our country in trouble,
so I won't answer it. But,
I can tell you who it wasn't was
Russia. Yeah. How about when they blamed Russia?
You know, they said Russia blew up their
own pipeline. It wasn't Russia.
So I won't answer the question at all
because I don't wanna get our country Yeah.
Any deeper
than they already are. But very dangerous to
do it,
but I think most people know who did
it.
What? See, that's a classic BS Trump answer.
Do you you know who knows that it
wasn't Russia? Literally everybody on the planet. Just
like everybody knows. Like, this is the kind
of thing we keep talking about. They keep
they're giving you the things that nobody's confused
about. Is anybody confused about JFK, MLK? Everybody
knows these things. Now I don't mean literally
everybody, but, I mean, a vast majority of
the world is already very much aware that
the US government's involved with Martin Luther King
Junior's death because they found that in a
civil suit in the court of law, and
it was publicly reported. But, yes, but we
don't teach it, and we water it down.
The government lies about it. But my point
is most people kind of generally know these
things already. In this case, does I mean,
is anybody stupid enough to still actually believe
that other than people that blindly watch only
corporate media, which I don't think is a
majority?
Everyone knows this. So by doing this, it's
an easy fake win. But he didn't even
win. He didn't tell you anything. So what
he effectively does is defend Joe Biden. Right?
So we know the US government did this.
That I think that's
objectively clear.
But what what you know, in in
when he sits there and doesn't tell you
that but says, I think we actually know,
that gives all of them to go, oh,
he's he knew it. He's telling you it's
bi. But you don't know what he's thinking.
Maybe he's thinking something different than you are.
Maybe he the bottom line
is if you're gonna believe that he is
going after, like, we're told he's gonna arrest
Hillary Clinton. Right? He's gonna lock up Joe
Biden. Right? Is that a plan?
Except that he works with him, makes deals
with Ukraine, and drives along with him, sets
a company with him at different events.
But it's all secret. He's doing this to
glow him into, you know, whatever the cue
narrative is. My point is, if you can't
recognize that him not doing this like, if
this was a crime, which it was, and
Joe Biden's responsible, why would that be a
hurt? This would be what an honest person
would do. That was Joe Biden. We can
prove it. Put him in jail. But he
doesn't because he's on the same side. Because
they knows what will hap they're both on
the same game here.
Even if you don't think they're on the
same side, Donald Trump would then feel that
he would be potentially at risk because of
that.
Maybe you care more about his well, I
I care about the truth.
You cannot pretend like he's fighting these guys
if he constantly pulls punches that would avoid
that avoids putting them in jail, whether Clinton
or Biden or Hunter or anybody.
I just find it to be crazy.
You know, and I can't say. That's not
somebody who's fighting the deep state. That's somebody
protecting the deep state. How do you not
see that?
So that point for me, I think, is
important. Because I think the obvious reality is
that they're working from the same side of
this. And whether it's Clinton or anything about
or Epstein or whatever this stuff is, I
sure. I hope. Like all the rest of
these narratives, the list will come out, and
they'll get rid of the FBI and all
these things they're saying. I sure as hell
hope that's the case. Why wouldn't I?
But when they inevitably do not happen,
I don't wanna have to constantly make the
the game is we always come back around
and see it, so we're saying, no. That's
not what actually happened. He changed his mind,
or they turned out it was this, or
they Democrats wouldn't let him.
Did I ever tell you what I thought
the ad had simply thought wasn't gonna come
to pass? And how many times can that
keep happening with so many different narratives until
we just stand back and go, well, guess
what? It kinda never does. They just like
to feed you BS and keep you in
the dark.
In the context of how this works, well,
here's another example of another
fake another a a a f
what do you call it?
An illusion. But, you know, a a fake
hero. In this case, we're talking about Twitter.
But this is what I think is really
important is that right now, with everything we're
dealing with, it's like it's like the fake
Nord Stream comment. In this case, the Twitter's
saving free speech or the Twitter's fighting for
this and that. Okay. Meanwhile, they're literally working
with Israel. Okay. Literally working with Authentix to
take your biometric data. Okay. That doesn't really
line up. Well, actually working with the ADL
to make sure you're still being censored for
Israel. Okay. These things aren't sounding so good
so far. On top of that, I keep
seeing this, by the way, and I'm not
I I don't
I don't know anybody else who could let
me know if you've seen this ever on
Twitter. I'm starting to wonder if these things
are specific to certain people,
but I get this constantly. Some privacy related
extensions may cause issues.
Okay. Well, that I mean, that's their prerogative
as a platform. Right? But don't profess to
be some privacy forward free speech platform if
you're stopping people from using VPNs in other
ways that would affect your platform.
But let's constantly get this.
My point then is that that is an
indication, which I already know, I think anybody
with a brain can see coming forward. They
are not going the direction of privacy. They're
going in the direction of whatever they're told
to do for the ADL discussion.
And that's about censorship. That's about exposing anonymity.
How many times have they both already told
you this, Yaccarino and Musk? They they don't
anonymity is the is the enemy. They keep
telling you that. Well, then we act like
it's some 40 chess move when he's making
something up. He told you what he's gonna
do. Like with WeChat, like with x everything
app, it's all what he already told you,
but we make up a fun narrative about
how he meant something else. In this case,
this guy, he loves to share this rabbit
hole's tweets even though he's literally I don't
know whether I don't think I think rabbit
hole is saying things that
I I don't know. I actually I haven't
looked at the account in a while. Anyway,
the point is, whether Rabbit Hole is making
these statements about Elon Musk or just about
other people, Elon loves to go exactly the
thing he said that I'm not at all,
even though every time he seems to share
this guy's content, it's exactly what he's doing.
Like, the guys censoring free speech are the
ones that are the enemy. And he's like,
Yeah! Like, well yeah, that's you, man. That's
what you're doing. In this case, he says,
Oh, you're posting at an alt? Like on
an alt account? Why don't you use your
real photo and name so I can call
your employer and get you fired for disagreeing
with my stupid world views?
And he goes, anonymity lets more people have
a voice. And he goes, exactly.
I mean, what a absolute
clown. You're literally trying to stop anonymity. You've
been public about that.
But exactly the thing you like to say,
and I'll pretend I'm on your side because
people will blindly follow me if I say
exactly.
It's embarrassing.
And
here is an example of one of many
we've talked about in the past
of what Libs of TikTok getting this person
fired from Home Depot because they made a
a tasteless joke about Donald Trump's assassination,
and that was over the top. Right? So
the worst kind of hypocrite. Right? The one
that was just righteous indignation about all the
mean lefties and bad woke snowflakes,
and then in comes the bro flakes. Right?
In comes the woke right to do the
exact same thing that they just did. But
it's okay because it's our thing, and and
you're not allowed to make Trump look bad
because, you know, you're a complete clown hypocrite.
You're doing exactly the same thing that they
do.
And we all see it. The woke right
is no longer hidden.
Here's what Polly Polly said about that.
A group of accounts forcibly removed her family's
anonymity on this platform.
They're still on Twitter.
Nick Fuentes was doxxed on Twitter, refused to
remove the post, and a killer showed up
at his home.
Elon is a tyrant who does selective enforcement
of the rules. He's also a hypocrite.
Completely agree with that. I mean, the post
alone is ridiculous because he's actively not doing
what he says he's doing. But or with
how about Laura Loomer, for example? Didn't they
boot her off because she was doxxing the
guy and made the racist jokes? But she
she was given a chance to come back
on. How come the other people weren't? Because
it's selective it's selective. And it's about what
will interest your you know, she's as disgustingly
racist as a lot of things you're pretending
to put forward, so I guess it works
for you.
But it's just it's gross, guys. It's on
the face dishonest.
But in case you forgot,
I just did this today, again.
Here's x, Twitter, background, authenticity. So basically, the
re the way I go through this to
find out if it's still there is you
go through and report something. Some of them,
you know, report spam and just go, thanks
for reporting. But if you go through to
report somebody impersonating, it takes you through this
process, which I'll never click the next button
on. Oh, my god. It keeps checking that
automatically for me. I don't wanna accidentally bump
it. But so you go through the process
and it says, okay. Well, we need to
find out who you are to be able
to verify that somebody's impersonating you. Right? And
look what it says. I consent to Twitter
and Authentics
still to this very day. That I don't
know why these points are so small. Or,
like, rather, I get I because we're being
suppressed into content. I'm sure if Tucker Carlson
made this point, will be the biggest bombshell
of the day. Realize that this is an
Israeli intelligence connected company that is literally taking
your biometrics
right there even though Twitter doesn't need those
right now.
Yep. And that's a that's an Israeli intelligence
entity, Unit 8200 connected, which deals with a
huge portion of Israeli intelligence
on their end of things. It's not why
would Israel be doing this for Twitter?
Oh, probably because they have an interest in
gathering your biometrics. Or as Censored Man points
out, not just Authentix, but CHEQ,
which is another Israeli intelligence connected startup
that's supposed to be fighting the bots. Well,
how's that working out? Now that we're overwhelmed
with Israeli bots and they control the conversation,
that's how this works. We're being played. It's
very simple. Just wanna make sure we point
that out. Because don't forget, he still pretends
that Authentix has stopped, but they no longer
use it. Some people still get shown Stripe
when they do this. That in and of
itself should be alarming to us, guys.
Too many people are are, you know, pretending
they've won already. They're winning. It's we're winning.
And so they just pretend it's not happening
in front of them. Those people are the
most like, the problem with that is that
they are they represent the largest problem in
this conversation. People that are too caught up
in their own illusion to even acknowledge what's
happening in front of them, while acting like
yours and all fighting the plan.
On another note, as Just the Thought points
out, this is rampant.
She says a genuine thank you to anyone
who reported this tweet or who commented about
this account, this one's a Illuminati bot, who
continuously is stealing other people's words. And I
mean, like, literally. This is not just, like,
an idea. This is people that are seeing
a con a a post, and they're just
literally copying and sharing. What by the way,
that's that's
I mean, I don't know if that's a
violation of their terms of service or not.
It's pretty disgusting. It's shady, and you should
be called out for it. But I it's,
you know,
it's
digital content theft, I guess, and I'm sure
they don't care about that. My point is
I just don't think it any technically violates
any law. But it's just the point is
it's being not just that they're doing it,
but that they do it, and then very
select accounts who grab up all the other
things get propped up by the Elon circle
and the rest of it. It's very disingenuous.
And this one, as you can see, it's
saying, I've seen this community note reaffirm this
before.
These accounts are monetized.
Right? This one has 2,000,000 followers and are
making money off smaller accounts. We should unfollow
and report these as often as possible because
even though the account is named bot, someone
somewhere is profiting from it. It says, rp
Twitter when we're when we were here to
share ideas and stories and not make money
off each other.
The point here is this and this person
said it did to her this person a
while back.
And it says, this is the case with
nearly every post from that account and other
associated accounts. They posted the post many times,
and look. You can see it. Like, identical.
And you and, look, in the time frame,
you can see it's earlier.
So that may not matter to you. Right?
But I think what's important is there's only
selected versions of his accounts that share and
then maybe 10 half the time omit certain
partisan elements or add things that they get
propped up by the Elon inner circle.
That I think is very, very telling for
where we go right now. And then you
overlap that with the financial aspect. So what
I'm gonna get to in a second, guys,
is the very concerning element of all this
that is
make sure I didn't move that.
Oh, maybe I did.
Hold on one second.
If I did, I feel like I wanna
add that back real quick.
Basically,
there's an additional part that I wanna get
into about the ethics part of it because
it becomes suddenly very relevant. Oh, yeah. I
think I added it. Shoot.
We'll see. We'll just go through it naturally
and see if I may I'm already jumping
ahead of myself maybe and did it a
second ago.
But so the bottom line is that there's
a part if I don't get through today
about the ethics
pledges, which are still very relevant. I mean,
I was I've been telling you that's going
to become a relevant story because no one
seems to care about it.
But, yeah, we'll just leave it there for
now. The point was ultimately that in in
this context,
there's an overlap with the crypto side of
this as well as a lot of other
points. I'm starting to see a picture develop
where I believe
that we're seeing a lot of financial crimes
happening here. But let's be clear about this.
I I think every one of them do
this. From Nancy Pelosi's stock manipulation
to just about everybody in this position trying
to profiteer
as best they can because they know that's
what everyone else is doing. And in fact,
I look at this like some kind of
a dirty cop dynamic. You know, the old
classic idea that cops kill cops they don't
trust, like, from every old movie we've seen.
Right? I think that's how this operates. I
think that if you do not take manipulations,
money, and bribery in in politicians, like, they
they get rid of you. Maybe legitimately or
maybe just box you out of the whole
situation.
Because I think they don't they if they're
all criminal, they don't want someone who doesn't
wanna I think that's what we're dealing with.
Either way, my point is that whether it's
Twitter and Visa overlapping
or the crypto dynamic, would it allow basically
money to funnel in to Donald Trump's crypto
or Melania's crypto without any real transparency? And
they didn't sign ethics pledges, so we don't
even know what these connect to. Yeah. I
think we're watching some I you know, honestly,
I think you you recognize I think Israel's
a playing part of that. Like, directly funneling
cash right through this administration
for a lot of things. But it could
be any number of other things. So I
want you to think about this ethics overlap
or this this way that we see money
flying around that's done in ways in a
technological
point that we didn't really see in the
last so many administrations.
But this is from ABC. Elon Musk's Twitter
partners with Visa,
which in and of itself should be a
large point. All these people, we're fighting the
deep state. We're fighting the war of the
rebels, and we're working with every single large
mainstream thing that exists.
Because that all lines up. Right? We're working
with all the billionaires. We're working with the
government. We're working with the military. We're working
with the CIA. We're working with the high
level transaction. We're working with crypto but we're
all rebels
fighting the deep state.
You literally just described the deep state.
I mean, I just still, I'm one of
the I'm more baffled now about why
anybody still pretends this isn't the most transparent
thing in the history of politics.
Maybe they do. Maybe we're in such a
controlled dynamic because of where this goes that
we're not we don't maybe we all see
it. Maybe it's like COVID. Maybe literally everybody
sees this right now except for moron screaming
Republican types. Right? The Joneses nix orders the
world. They're yelling forever. It's great. And Twitter's
saving the world. Republicans are winning.
Or maybe I'm wrong, and I'm the only
one.
I I don't know. To me, it seems
like a cartoon right now.
But partners with Visa on payment service in
an effort to become an everything app. That's
a quote.
It's exactly didn't they used to pretend we
were crazy for even saying that? Because it
was uncomfortable at the beginning point, because it
felt too much like China and close to
technocracy and COVID? And, you know, digital ID?
Oh, that's not true. He's not gonna do
that. And then step by step, it became
the logic for why we need it. Because
we're fighting immigration, you know, whatever it is.
It's crazy, guys. This is everything we were
all worried about when it was something other
than Elon Musk. We're being funneled into a
a very clear control structure.
And Visa
does not represent anything other than corporate mainstream
internal. Visa is tagged to everything, guys. The
intelligence entity, the military,
foreign dynamics, Visa is not on the side
of anything other than the deep state establishment.
Or let's the deep remove the deep state.
The the establishment.
It's such a broad, muddy term today. Whatever
you think that means, and everyone's got a
different picture. I just simply mean the unelected
power structure. I think that's what it really
means.
Says Twitter's teaming
up with Visa to offer systems for real
time payments on the app. Weird.
Like we all told you. How do you
think that's gonna work?
How exactly do you think that's gonna function?
You're gonna need a digital ID. There's no
way around it.
You're gonna probably end up getting forced into
some kind of crypto digital dynamic on the
crypt on the,
currency side of it all, which will probably
be some kind of, as we've talked about,
some kind of stablecoin,
privatized aspect of it,
Twitter coin or whatever else, or maybe they'll
use one of their meme who knows?
It's not.
It is what you push back on if
it was anybody other than this and doing
it in this moment.
Visa is the first partner for the platform
Xmoney account. See? Which is set to launch
this year.
Linda Yaccarito from the World Economic Forum, because
you can trust her. Right? Said in a
post, the offering will support an in platform
digital wallet
and peer to peer payments connected to users'
debit cards with an option to transfer funds
to a bank account. You know who else
was involved with the social credit right now
back in COVID? Mastercard.
Right? These are interconnected.
You're literally being told you're going to have
a digital wallet and a peer to peer
exchange on their app, not some peer to
peer crypto dynamic that doesn't require a middleman.
No. No. No. They're the middleman.
Right? My point is not like crypto's supposed
to be, but how they want you to
think it is.
Right? Isn't crypto supposed to bolster the state?
Isn't that how it works these days? Apparently,
freedom, libertarian stuff. It's all about building the
state up. Right?
Wild.
It's exactly what we warned about.
Now Dominic says, x partners Visa to launch
x money. If they can take away your
blue your check mark and suspend your account,
they can take away your money.
How is this not obvious? Now I wouldn't
even call it a precursor to social credit.
This is social credit, guys. You're being walked
in. You're being pied piper by the pied
piper technocracy
right into the structure you thought you just
got done fighting.
Right in front of you.
Whitney points out the part of the government
well, first, the the rage shares this. DARPA
to launch precrime
AML program.
You think maybe they'd give it, like, a
moment in between. Right? No. No. Just one
after another. Right? So you've got DARPA's XAI
Twitter program that they're literally working on, but
you're not supposed to know that. Right? And
then DARPA rolls out its financial pre crime
dynamic, totally not connected even though they're running
both programs.
How do you not see this? The Department
of Defense is planning to launch a new
anti money laundering program aiming at stopping money
laundering before it happens.
Totally. But not when they do it though.
Right? Because they launder money as a matter
of policy, but that's the good guy stuff.
We'll only do we'll only go after the
bad guy stuff. You know, maybe if you're
a foreign you're an American living overseas and
we'll use our extra external tax service to
make sure we scoop up what you have,
make sure you're not laundering money somewhere else,
go after Iran and all the ones we
don't like. And then as we literally launder
money with the CIA because they're gonna be
helping, Trump just told you. That's what they
do.
This will not be aimed at anything other
than people they want to suppress, people they
want to they want to sideline.
It's precrime on top of all of it,
guys. That's what they're literally telling you. Before
it happens, how do you think that makes
sense? How do you wanna line that up
with the Constitution? Oh, we're already moving past
that?
That's what they want. That's what they keep
telling you. Burn the flag. Go to jail.
Who cares about the Constitution? Yeah. Screw those
Muslims.
Guys, you're being played in such a spectacularly
obvious way. This will be used to suppress
you.
How do you think they're gonna be able
to if it hasn't happened yet, then it's
not this is a violation of your rights.
But every which way, they're they're kind of
wiggling their way in to get you to
undermine your own rights.
Whitney says the part of the government that's
never passed an audit and is part of
the massive black budget blob is launching a
program to stop money laundering before it happens.
Think about that. Think about how comically stupid
that is if it wasn't so terrifying.
They're the 1
1,000,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000,000 in debt that they just
keep pushing up, but but it's
they're gonna make sure.
If history is an education, this will be
just another cool tool to clamp down
on the informal economy and surveil the public,
while enabling business as usual at the national
security agencies that commit this crime at a
scale that would boggle the minds of most.
And then Catherine Austin Fitts just says you
got that right.
That is pretty crazy, the timing of all
of this. Matt Kim made a little quick
video on this about DARPA and precrime. Here's
what he had to say.
For precrime?
The Department of Defense just announced their new
DARPA program, the anticipatory
and adaptive anti money laundering initiative,
a three m l. This program claims it
will revolutionize how we detect and prevent money
laundering using cutting edge technologies.
So what does it actually mean? A three
m l aims to identify suspicious financial activity
before it becomes harmful. It will use predictive
analytics, real time monitoring,
advanced machine learning, and AI systems to achieve
this. DARPA plans to collaborate with government agencies,
financial institutions,
and technology companies to gather data and information.
If you're thinking, but I don't commit financial
crimes, think again.
This isn't just about criminals. This is a
government surveillance program that will comb through all
financial transactions
targeting individuals
before
a crime is even committed. Sound familiar?
This is literally the beginning of a minority
report style pre crime system.
There are huge concerns here. 1, ethical concerns.
How do you prevent false positives? Imagine being
flagged for a crime that hasn't happened. Or
2, surveillance issues. This is a direct infringement
on your right to financial privacy.
3, reliance on AI.
What data is being used to train these
systems? What biases might be built in? Are
we really comfortable with trading our privacy for
untested AI predictions?
Shouldn't miss Chien decide who might commit a
crime?
Because today, it's about money laundering tomorrow.
I love the mind that it's not something
you can trade away. I think these are
inherent rights. That's what our founding fathers outlined.
Now, again, they didn't make that reality. They
just argued these are inherent things that exist
whether or not we write these things down,
which is the I think it's important to
think of it like that. Because for me,
that's why it's always aligned much more with
like I've always said, I I I do
not believe in a state of society. I
I do not believe that we should live
in a world where government dictates what your
life should be like in any context.
But I do argue that if we're forced
to live in a society where we're forced
to have a government, that we have the
a the constitutional
outline, I think, is the best dynamic.
And I think what it shows you is
a is a world in which these things
are inherent, that you don't need them to
but that's the game they play. But they've
slowly rolled you in a world where they
tell you they can dictate these things and
they can legislate them away even though that
is exactly the opposite of how they were
outlined.
That's why we've talked about it in the
past, like, the actual
bill the actual constitution, the actual bill of
rights. Right? The idea being that the bill
of rights is simply the first 10 amendments
to the constitution. And the point being, none
of those ten are contradictory to anything else
in the constitution. The point is, as Mabry
versus Madison ruled, and I think it was
18/92,
anything repugnant to the constitution is null and
void. A supreme court ruling has been upheld.
Problem is today, we already have many things
that are directly contradictory to the constitution. That's
because our government is being infiltrated for something
else. You could argue other than Israel, that's
for you to decide. It's quite obvious though
that they're being driven to not care about
what is foundational
to this country.
And 1 by 1, they so if they
all unanimously
passed a law that said you couldn't own
a gun, it wouldn't matter. It's repugnant to
the constitution, which is based on an inherent
right that is not because they said it's
because it's a god given right.
Inalienable.
See the point? So we come to a
reality today where they're now telling you that
they can change these things. They cannot. But
you're gonna have a lot of screaming, you
know, girls at Elvis show kind of like
absurdities.
Right? Literally, like, the equivalent of throwing your
underwear on a stage the way they're acting
with these Elons and Trumps. They just will
not recognize that they're being played. I think
most people, though, are beginning to see that.
In this context
of the Matt Kim video you just heard,
just a thought shared, it's most definitely not
just about money laundering already.
Whitney shared this. This was on the 3rd
in response to a Wired article that says
AI can now predict crime before it happens.
This guy says, no. It can't.
She's under the last Trump administration, and this
is the important point she always makes about
this.
This was rolled out in earnest under Trump's
administration with Bill Barr. And just precrime.
Very real.
So there if you're looking for precedent, if
you're looking for something to connect the dot,
it's coming from Trump to Trump at this
point. Now Biden played his role as well.
I'm of the mind. They're all in this
together. But if you need to make it
about one thing, this is obvious right now.
But just hear me on that. I don't
think this is unique to left and right,
Trump or Biden. I think it's about your
government
passing this back and forth. You know, the
the with so many ways to frame it.
But it's the way they use them both
to bring you down to a very specific
you know, they condense you down into one
specific thing. They want you in the middle,
so they give you both extremes and drive
you into it, make you think you made
that choice.
Under the last Trump administration, then AG Bill
Barr legalized precrime
prosecutions at the Department of Justice in 2019.
Trump called on social media
to surveil users to identify would be mass
shooters
before they commit any crime. How do we
forget stuff like this? How do we forget
his bump stock bill? How do we forget
all the different things that clearly are so
if I mean
it's like it's such an obvious
jump in the direction that you're on guard
for on the other side that are still
making moves, but so much like, far less.
As I mean, high High Impact Flix makes
this point. That his the bump stock ban,
all these different things they did that made
legal owners suddenly criminals.
If that happened on the left, it'd be
this huge story. The point is they're both
doing it. It's not unique to one side,
but they're blinded to one side, sort of
like the same thing in reverse. Why a
lot of Democrats seem to be brainwashed
walking right into the medical problems, it's the
same thing on either side.
The problem is now what we're seeing is
this kind
of blend that really, I I think what
we're seeing is they're pulling out the stops.
I think we're like,
the thing that a lot of people have
been predicting for a long time I mean,
it's what's so hard to say because it's
something that had been predicted. Maybe maybe it'll
be another 10 years from now. I'm of
the mind that what we're about to see
is coming soon.
Not because it's just the logical conclusion, but
because you're seeing all of the signs. The
the rushing of it, the exposing of what
they do, the the tearing down of of
their central narratives to bring you to this
next step.
That's why I see it kind of really
clearly pulling out all the stops. But going
forward, it says, I now worry that the
main artificial
intelligence
predictive policing, Palantir,
with which, again, if you don't remember, is
the multi is the main kind of influencing
arm from in, right, the Trump administration right
now, that in Israel, I would argue,
with multiple ties to the incoming administration within
the CIA or an equivalent going to be
rolled out with law enforcement nationwide
under the guise of addressing staff shortages?
That's 1. And increasing efficiency.
Now what's interesting is think about it is
so now they're they're telling you, right, we
need to get rid of all these people
and save some money, and then all of
a sudden that becomes a rationale for why
we need some sort of digital fill in.
Right? Or, as we keep telling you, what
do you think efficiency means in this age,
guys? Every one of them that brought up
efficiency, all they were pointing at some sort
of artificial intelligence or digital program.
Is that what you thought when he told
you he was gonna make the government more
no. You were like, get rid of this
company, get rid
of that group. Nope. In most cases,
I think maybe on the next show, but
in most cases, they're adding things right now.
Now who knows? Maybe in the next so
many months they'll slash everything in half. Right
now they're pretending like they've saved all of
these 1,000,000,000 of dollars. Here's a screenshot.
I think they've from what I can tell,
they've done very little so far in the
act in the amounts to, like, actual money
being cut down. They've been hiring different groups.
They've added on more. Just spent or at
least put forward a $500,000,000,000
bill for AI infrastructure. So let's not pretend
like we're slashing funny
funds right now.
But these things are a means to an
end. Problem reaction solution.
Artificial intelligence is already being used to write
police reports.
Law enforcement management software, like the very spooky
Mark 43 is already widely used by police
departments.
Several of which have tried trialed Palantir's predictive
policing functionally
in real life.
These AIs are not 90% accurate, absolutely less.
But even if you believe those metrics,
how do the erroneously targeted 10%
explain their innocence for a crime that hasn't
even happened?
Think about how terrifying that is.
So how I mean, if they're telling you
you're guilty because AI says, sorta sounds like
Israel murdering innocent people, doesn't it? Well, Lavender
said, that's what they were saying.
I'm telling you. These are and are we
forgetting that Palantir is involved with that program?
They're literally working with Israel on the ground
to test its artificial intelligence program. It's coming
to you.
Says don't fall for the convenience and the
efficiency. Sales pitches. AI precrime is the end
of liberty.
I agree.
Now we all include the show, we talk
about this because it's important to see the
connection here. X AI
I'll just bring this up too since we're
talking about it.
This is the this is DARPA's page
2021.
DARPA's explainable AI program.
X AI.
Where it says they basically ended a 4
year research program right at the end of
2021.
So many months later into 2022,
Elon Musk buys Twitter, turns it into x.com,
which by the way was the old x.com
was the everything thing with the financial part
they tried to build back then, and it
is now x.com again, and turns it starts
an AI program called XAI.
And they literally pretend that there's no connection.
It is literally explainable AI. That's what this
is. And if you look at this, what's
under every post?
X I, explain this post.
Bee. What a weird coincidence.
It's like pal it's like total information awareness
and Palantir.
This is the DARPA extension into the private
sector, so there's no accountability
through Elon Musk that's being used to roll
out everything, literally, everything app.
It's right in front of you. The quiet
transition from DARPA's x AI to Elon's x
AI.
As Palantir,
an AI powered operations for every decision. I
mean, everything they're doing is coming together right
now,
right in front of you.
Here is just a thought making a statement
about DARPA, which is this overlaps with the
social media side of it. One of the
main reasons that DARPA and US intelligence created
social media platforms
and you gotta think about that big arc
as well. Right? Literally, from the Internet itself,
the social media platforms, to the intelligence explainable
artificial intelligence
that I mean, it's this is all through
your government military technology apparatus that's we're being
played.
The reason they created them was to create
a, in her opinion, a global population of
people who are too focused on followers and
likes and manufacture dopamine hits through a screen
to recognize what's happening around them. These screens
are conditioning us to exist solely in our
own echo chamber, which is what Twitter is
on overdrive about right now. A virtual reality
created for each and every one of us.
That's kinda what I keep talking about in
regard to what I think Twitter is.
At some point later down the line, we're
gonna look back and go, that's what Ryan
was talking about. Now it all I just
don't know how to to
verbalize it. But the point is, like, it's
not just different ads. Right? We are being
confronted with, like, literal different Twitters.
Like, it's it we're being experimented on, in
my opinion. And I think it's be we're
they're testing out to see how we could
be corralled and how one thing here, one
thought, you know, if this doesn't happen or
you know, all sorts of anomalies that overlap
with the whole digital meta, you know, digital
twin dynamic.
There's so much happening right now. If you
think that sounds crazy, then, god, you are
way behind. These are public conversations. My point
is about whether this is being done to
you through Twitter in this moment, not whether
it's happening. It's happening. This is public.
Filled with information and images demanding our constant
attention,
a reality where we can look and act
and be perceived differently than in our everyday
lives, an escape from all of the mundane,
depressing, and overwhelming aspects of society despite the
fact that it has provably shown to make
you far more depressed, a society that has
been built to seek an exit sign at
all costs. But while our eyes are glued
to our screens, a surveillance and AI system
is being built around us, one that will
track and control individuals like never before.
That's I think it's a reactionary thing, guys.
I think they're terrified of us right now.
This is not hidden nor is it a
hyperbole. It is happening at alarmingly fast rates.
We will look away from our phones and
computers in time to realize will we look
away in time to realize what's happening?
I don't know what she says. I'm here
typing this through a screen after all.
But
I agree.
And I think
it's being built around us as we see
as, you know, as we type, speak, and
engage. I think it's important to still use
this, but it's important to pull yourself out
of this as often as possible.
But I really do think that's correct. I
think what's happening is because people are pulling
away from it.
It's not having the effect that it has
been over the years. So they need to
find a new like, as Garland Nixon said,
it's a corporate reorganization. They're literally deciding they
need to roll out the new system.
Isn't that exactly what Klaus Schwab told us?
Right. But he said it in the Bond
villain voice, so now we're looking for the
Elon voice before we start accepting it.
Well, as we've talked about, here's the exact
example. This is from we already showed you
this before.
From 2014.
Air Force Research. How to use social media
to control people like drones.
Can you guess who ran this program?
DARPA.
Facebook isn't the only organization conducting research into
how attitudes are affected by social media. The
Department of Defense,
the Department of Defense has invested 1,000,000 of
dollars over the past few years investigating social
media, social networks, and how information spreads across
them. Do you this is the big they
were researching it, and Elon and Twitter and
XAI is the rolling out of this experiment.
That's what I think.
While Facebook and Cornell University researchers manipulated the
what individual saw in their social media streams,
military funded research, including projects from DARPA,
social it's called social media in strategic communications
program, has looked primarily into how messages from
influential members of social networks propagate.
Guys, how are we missing this?
Now, that doesn't have to mean that they
know they're doing it. Right? Like an Ian
Carroll, for example. Does he is that deliberate?
Is he even aware? Do they is this
a a an effort to use them without
knowing? The point is that doesn't they've researched
how to use influential entities to control the
flow of information,
to control the message.
How is that not more transparently right now
where we are than anything we've ever talked
about?
It says a paper entitled containment
control
for a social network with state dependent connectivity.
State dependent connectivity.
The research demonstrates that the mathematical principles used
to control groups of autonomous robots
can be applied to social networks in order
to control human behavior.
Yeah. I mean, there's so much more I
I I've gone I I plan to go
more into this. I've said it I've said
that in the past, but I wanted to
bring that up for this just on a
quick point. Very important to
see. Ritchie Allen points out, and this is
this is what I think he might nailed
it right here.
Lockdowns in a different way.
Internet lockdowns are coming, he says, and sooner
than we think.
And he's talking from the UK perspective. The
Labor Party will introduce a bill before next
election to give the home office the power
to temporarily limit the public's access to social
media sites during a significant news event.
They'll say it's necessary to maintain public order
and prevent the spread of harmful misinformation.
Internet lockdowns are coming, and neither Musk nor
Zuckerberg will do anything about it.
Now, of course, you you'll tell yourself that
Musk wouldn't do that or that's not they're
not stopping the they're they don't care about
woke. Well, see, if you only look at
it from one angle and miss how they're
doing the same thing in regard to antisemitism,
hate speech through ADL, it's the same thing,
guys. So the bottom line,
all of a sudden, there's a major event.
Let's just call it a very serious anti
Semitic event.
And all of a sudden, they go, well,
we have to kinda pull back on this
because they're we're being overrun with anti Semitic
misinformation. And and that will be in combination
with the anti Semitism
executive
order that I believe is coming. There's already
bills all over the country that are unconstitutional
like in Texas,
anti BDS, and all and so on. I
mean, it's it's right on the surface. These
are literally unconstitutional. They're telling you can't say
things that they don't want you to say
because Israel doesn't want you to say them.
Even if you think they're exactly what you
even if they're the most racist thing in
the world, you have a right to say
what you want. That's free speech. The the
actual free speech we discussed, not the fake
limited dynamic Twitter pretends is free speech.
So I think he's right. I think we're
gonna get to a point to where something,
whether this by itself, or kind of merges
with a couple of other events, which is
kinda where I see this going.
This you might find especially interesting. Bebek
decided to break his silence
on Musk and Doge exit.
There's only a few things that really stand
out to me, but I do think that
they're clear. Now, again, the point I always
think is funny
is the the the queue type people that
will make whatever they want out of the
most obscure nonsense
to make it into something will get a
message from somebody who pretty clearly seems to
be trying to send a message and never
connect those dots. Here's what it says.
We had different they they asked him, like,
what happened? Right? In regard to, you know,
why there you know, he denied a falling
out with Elon Musk. They wanted because remember,
he he was supposed to be the co
chair or co lead of Doge.
And then he just dropped away and saying,
I'm gonna run for Congress.
But
Musk alluded to, like, firing him. It was
weird. So here, he says, we had different
and complementary approaches.
Whereas Musk
examined
the issue through a technological
mindset,
I focused more on a constitutional
law,
legislative based approach.
Oh, good. So he's rolling out technocracy, and
you at least pretend you were fighting for
constitutional law.
That's a pretty big statement if you really
wanna listen to it.
Technological
mindset. Isn't that exactly what we all were
pretending we were fighting? So many of us
actually were during COVID 19, during the great
reset, still to this day?
If you had to choose between a constitutional
law mindset and a technological mindset, what do
you think most conservatives would tell you they
would fight for if it wasn't involving Elon
Musk?
You damn well
know. To me, that's straight up him throwing
Elon Musk under the bus because I think
he got pushed out.
And he's telling you, these these guys are
not fighting for your rights.
That's what I think. You could decide for
yourself.
Well, I'm sure we'll get more as this
boils over and we see him, you know,
potentially go into congress.
But it says, asked point blank about reports
that Musk had fired him. Ramaswami claimed his
abrupt departure stemmed from a mutual discussion. Well,
that's not what Elon basically said. So he
goes on to say, we're on the same
page.
Divide and conquer.
That's what he said.
In saving the country, it's not a one
man show from the top down to the
bottom up. It's all of the above, and
that's what I'm in for. No. It's not
even remotely true. It's 100% top down in
this country. But what's funny, and he damn
well knows that, by the way, we're on
the same page,
divide and conquer?
I mean, guys, it's just so obvious. These
people are manipulators.
Like, the the whole peace through strength dynamic
they're pushing, which is I'll show you tomorrow,
which literally
that's Netanyahu.
Total victory, peace through strength, that from us
to Trump is just regurgitating.
It's that's where that comes from. It's not
unique to to Netanyahu, but it's what he's
been screaming since the the for a long
time.
But I think that's pretty telling if you
ask me.
Now,
Stargate,
if you didn't already know, is important because
this is this is the project. I mean,
Katherine Austin Fitts called this,
Warp Speed 2.0
from the mRNA side of this. But I
do agree with the bigger picture as 2.0.
It's not just about another shot. It's about
the shot and the overlap with the technocratic
direction. Whether we're talking nanotechnology,
whether we're talking about the artificial intelligence tracking
of it all, which, by the way, as
Whitney covered, was already going on with Oracle,
with Mansef Salawi, Larry Ellison. This was already
happening after COVID 19.
That's what Oracle was doing. They were tracking
the pharmacovigilance.
They know damn well about all of the
horrifying things that happened to you, and they're
rolling out another shot to deal with. Here's
we'll do one for the cancers we caused.
Right?
My point though is this is what they're
rolling out. The AI control as I as
I called it over here,
the AI biomedical control grid.
But as Derek wrote, Stargate, Trump partners with
technocrats to promote mRNA injections, AI, and transhumanism.
Right? So you've got SoftBank's representative.
That's Israel. I mean, I I went over
this pretty clearly. SoftBank is is ex
extensively overlapped with Israel in a lot of
different ways, including financially
backing
their start up entity, which in my my,
aspect, which in my opinion is the way
unit a 200 and Mossad essentially infiltrate other
countries.
Literally rolling out these startups and openly telling
you they're doing so with the interest of
Israeli government. And if if you say that,
though, you're racist, even though they publicly say
it in interviews.
So that's star that's SoftBank. So the the
CEO is the is the chair of the
whole thing, and SoftBank is the financial side
of it.
To me, that's Israel. Then you got Larry
Ellison for Oracle, which is the deep state,
which is surveillance, which is the same entity
we just talked about overlapping, by the way,
with also with Israel. But clearly,
the COVID 19 surveillance dynamic and all these
things were
imagine if Biden rolled all these out.
I'd say it's almost it's almost tired even
saying that. You damn well know they would
be losing their minds over it. Or, of
course, Sam Altman with Worldcoin, OpenAI, Jack GPT.
You know what? Elon Musk tells he was
gonna end the world, but that all lines
up, though. Right? We're winning, guys. We're winning.
Can't you tell?
Well, David Icke says,
in regard to Disclosed TV, telling you that
OpenAI launches
Chat GPT for the government.
Yeah. You just can't I told you so.
It's just kind of losing its meaning here.
For US government agencies. Great. So NSA,
CIA,
National Reconnaissance Office, now they get to use
their artificial intelligence to
run their government agencies,
allowing the agencies to feed non public sensitive
information
into AI models in secure environments.
Oh, great.
This is your technocracy.
If you're still pretending this is not exactly
what it looks like, you're lying to yourself.
You know what you're looking at. You know
what this is. If it was Biden or
anybody else you would already be calling out,
call it out.
You really I mean, is it really about
winning to the point to where you allow
the technocratic control structure to ruin your life
so Trump doesn't fail? Is that really what
you're doing?
David Icke says, as I keep warning, AI
is taking over government, which is exactly what
the Trump regime and his tech oligarchs are
there to do
while they divert you with the we're winning
propaganda.
Trump rolls out the AI Biomedical Control Grid
backed by Israel and the deep state.
It's what this is.
Truthstream Media highlights June Slater saying, and I
showed you this before. This is from the
23rd January.
She says, what if
they're deliberately letting street crime, knife attacks,
repeated shoplifting get worse
so that we welcome more surveillance.
Instead of policing wrongdoing doers, they get the
opportunity to police all of us. Now, sadly,
I think they're looking at this from, like,
the democrats. That's what I kinda get the
sense of, but it's not.
It's your government
using you like this.
And they simply said, well, that's how the
biometric entry exit wall will get a public
seal approval.
After years of unimpeded illegal immigration
and border agents, both sides of your government,
pretending they're suddenly forgot their jobs cutting fences
and fist bumping people on the way in.
Remember the Texas point, right, with all those,
buoys with razors on them, and everyone's all
up in arms. And and this guy drove
down the road and was like, there's, like,
3 fences swinging in the wind.
Nobody's standing here. Not immigrants,
not government, not border patrol.
So why are all the immigrants huddled around
the one place where all the port border
patrol are? Why? We're being lied to. Like,
it he was a Republican. He was like,
guys, we're being manipulated. He's like, yep. That's
that's where we are. Problem, reaction, solution. That's
in no way to say that that's not
an important discussion or that immigration it's they're
they know that and still they're lying to
you about it, guys. They're using it to
trick you.
Well, on this point, let's ask ourselves, how
do you think this connects? Right?
Well, if they need to
identify,
punish, and deport antisemites,
how do you think they do that?
Well, if you didn't already see, Trump is
ordering
a review to identify, punish, and deport antisemites.
Now, this is exactly what we already told
you was coming.
Because he told you he would do this.
At every rally where he was speaking to
Israeli lobbyists,
or with Israeli flags behind him, with Miriam
Adelson sitting 3 feet behind him, at every
rally with fans behind him. Because that makes
sense.
He kept telling you he's gonna get rid
of the Jew haters. He's gonna deport all
these people. Every one of the things he's
saying wildly unconstitutional.
And that's not even remotely to say the
same as supporting what gross people would say
that have racist mindsets.
Still is a right to be able to
think and say what you want.
The same things you guys would say in
certain contexts if you're only on a partisan
side.
The problem here is that this is
a
oh, and by the way, don't forget, this
person here is the one that has filled
the role with Massie out of the way.
And she is a rabid Zionist, pro Israel
defender.
So Trump orders review to identify, punish, and
deport in the Semites. How many times did
we hear that that was never going to
happen? The Israelis, he's tricking Israel, or that's
not true, he never even said it, or
whatever the narrative was.
Just like it was a troll to rename
the goal. Too late. That happened. Oh, we
were just trolling you about running for a
3rd term. No. No. That's being introduced.
Right? Or what about putting Trump's face on
Mount Mount Rushmore? Yeah. The whether you guys
think these are trolling all the way until
you make it a reality or not, they're
real. It's happening. They're actually putting in introducing
legislation to add Trump's face to Mount Rushmore.
And I honestly think it literally probably is
them just trying to get a rise. But
it's real. Even if it is still a
troll, they're actually doing it. It's it's just
crazy to me. So I don't see the
point is, I think with stuff like that,
they absolutely want that. They absolutely think that's
cool and absolutely think it should happen, but
also feel really dumb and childish because it's
dumb and childish. And it's a stupid thing
to put forward because it's not about you
liking them and adding them to the wall,
guys. It's about the historical meaning of it.
I'm not even saying I support them. I
mean, it's just it's lunacy to watch these
children in the room act like they're the
leading people in the conversation.
The point though is I think that's all
distracting.
You're being played by thinking that's a fun
thing to talk about. Bottom line is it's
about what's being built around you while you
yell about things like that.
This is the most pretty much the most
important thing in this conversation right now. I
don't think I'm highlighting anything here.
We talked about this all the way back
on the immigration the the border conversation with
the SAVE Act. Right? Which is one part
of it. Using the immigration dynamic that I
think is being completely facilitated through Israel with
obvious examples I've shown you more than once
to flood in there as they talk about
it. That's what I think is so ridiculous.
I every time I bring it up, I
guarantee somebody thinks I just hate Jewish people
even though it's so spectacularly
not the case.
Clearly, fighting alongside Jews and Muslims and Christians
to call out what we're all calling out,
the Zionist genocide.
But the point is that it's obvious to
see Israeli government entities literally talking about this.
Having their having the chief rabbi of Ben
Gavir and Smotris literally say how they're causing
immigration in this country openly.
The point, though, is all of it aside,
the reality is I think it's obviously been
weaponized, but you decide that for yourself about
why. The point is on this side of
it, we can see our government already trying
to utilize that to roll out the things
we tell you are coming.
Digital ID, for example. That was the say
back, real ID, ID 2020. All these things
are big major red flags. They're all coming
together. This was about the I idea of
trying to do it because, you know, the
the election, hurry, get it done. Until Thomas
Massie put the air out of that and
said, well, this won't even be done before
the election. Too late. Well, they're still gonna
roll it out. They're still gonna try.
So the point is this all comes together
with this obvious conversation
about rolling out
a
arguably something, one more element that will then
force them to argue they need to identify
x, y, and z. Right? Well, Artesh, I
will show you a second what I already
pointed to, which is even being denied because
it's uncomfortable, about a veteran already being arrested
or detained for the most part
because he was brown.
Because they weren't using warrants.
Exactly like we were telling you. That this
is a broad militaristic
police state sweeping of just anybody they wanna
go after.
Stop you know, let's do stop and frisk,
he kept telling you, even though that's wildly
unconstitutional.
Sorta like the rest of the stuff. You
know, get the guns, do a process later.
Burn the flag, go to jail. All unconstitutional.
But you guys cheer it on because Trump
said it.
Here, we have the example of all these
building to the idea where they can use
this to force you to acquiesce to whatever
the new digital structure is.
Facial scans, social credit, you know this is
there. They're all talking about it. David Icke
says, what first amendment?
The free speech hero. Right? Israel owned Trump
ordering review to identify, punish, and deport antisemites,
including students on visas. Who decides
what's antisemitic?
He does. No. Or Israel does. The fake
free speech advocates cheer their God king without
a smear of embarrassment.
It's pretty sad.
Remember,
the many times
I guess I'll come back to it.
I'm trying to think if I should just
play that first so you could hear it.
Yeah. Might as well. So I think I've
got it right here.
Yeah.
So the point though,
in case you don't know I mean, okay,
just to make it very clear. Like, so
the discussing the idea of removing
now there's a big focus on, you know,
foreign students and visas,
but I'll read it's very clear. There's an
obvious opening for people who they just argue
be need to be removed because they are
you know, they they really blend the idea
of what they want you to think as
some kind Hamas supporting terrorist.
Now even with students, by the way, whether
foreign students on visas or not,
I've and I'm at this point the other
day. Even illegal immigrants, in some cases,
as the Supreme Court has wrote more than
once stood by,
are protected in some cases under the constitution.
And that's an extreme that that's you know,
it's somebody who's even here illegally. And there
are has been cases, but they've been more
than once argued that they apply in certain
cases. My point is that people here here
on student visas,
they absolutely still are protected under the constitutional
rights. And the bottom line is that you
can't just argue, we don't like what you
think, therefore, you have to leave. But then,
of course, there's their people will argue that
they're not they're here on visas. Fine. Even
though you're wrong. The point is what we're
talking about in my my mindset is the
argument he's already made, which I'll play for
you now, that they're talking about people who
simply
they frame as Jew haters.
Even though what they're actually framing is people
that support Palestine, which I'm sure there's an
overlap somewhere.
But my point is that almost broad, almost
entirely misrepresenting people that simply wanna fight for
Palestinian self determination,
most of which I can see don't feel
the way they claim they do. In fact,
are actively fighting for a peaceful resolution for
all. They just don't like that because that's
not what they want. The point though is
that this is unconstitutional.
This is a violation of your rights and
is being rolled out for a foreign country
at the expense of your rights.
We will remove
the jihadist sympathizers
and Jew haters. We're gonna remove the Jew
haters
who do nothing to help our country. They
only wanna destroy our country,
and we will never let the horrors of
October 7th be repeated here on Americans. We
will not let that happen, and we will
solve the problem that we have.
Now let me be very clear.
Let's just even say somebody
has negative you know, what? You hate this
country.
I mean, realize that what we're talking about
are feelings and thoughts.
At the same time, we're talking about precrime.
Like, does that not make you uncomfortable?
I I get the idea that we love
to be all maximalist about this and pretend,
you know, well, we can't let people in
our country that don't like our country.
I mean, that's lunacy, guys. There's people all
over the world that travel in many different
contexts that don't love and or hate. There's
a lot of reason people have to hate
this government.
You have a right to feel which I
mean, there's there's Americans that live in this
country that clearly hate this government.
That's what maybe they think it's only one
half of it. Maybe those that are aware
enough to see that it's all the government.
Nonetheless,
you're telling us that people who don't want
the hate don't have to share the same
ideology or don't like the same thing. That's
what they're ultimately talking about. I think Kirk
just recently said the same thing. There we
go. We don't want you here if you
don't share the say. Like, you guys are
the extremists in this conversation. What you're doing
is framing this as you have to think
and feel just like we do or you're
not welcome here. Doesn't that start to feel
a little bit eerie like the past examples
we've seen in history? I mean, they're the
ones projecting this on everybody else while they
act in the most extremist, most
what's the right word for that? Like, it's
just extremism, guys. It's what they're doing. And
you're telling us that people aren't allowed to
dislike this country. Right? Or have a certain
feeling about certain people or hate certain groups
or
wanna support Palestine,
which is what you pretend
that is all those things. It's it's just
it's infuriating, guys. So and, again, the point
that I'm making clear is that if you
let's just say you're a person out there
that hates Jewish people. I think you're disgusting
for randomly hating people just because of their
religion. It's not ethnicity, by the way. This
is a religion.
My point, though, is that you would still
have a right to feel that way. And
I would defend that right even though I
would think you're disgusting.
It's as simple as that. Anyone who thinks
anything anyone who argues something else, which you
have a right to,
you don't believe in free speech, though. Simple
as that. And I we can have a
conversation about that, but preparing you do
is just dishonest. You believe in limited speech,
even if it's only the one thing you're
talking about. Simple as that. And that's how
they abuse this conversation.
And the and then, guys, this clip, there's
so many different clips in here of him
saying basically the same thing in different ways.
Here's the one where he says he believes
Israel rightly supposed to control Congress. It's not
a joke. You know, the biggest change I've
seen in Congress is Israel
literally owned congress. You understand that 10 years
ago, 15 years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And I think you know exactly what
I what I'm saying.
They had such power. Israel had such power
and rightfully
over congress.
And then it goes to the second clip
where he says basically the same thing in
a different way, rightfully over congress. It's not
taken out of context. I mean, I put
them through the whole thing. It's just funny
how people who just don't wanna admit it,
don't like what it shows, will always just
assume that it must be something else. There
must be a reason why it's not what
I think I'm seeing right there, and then
never follow-up.
Because they prefer to leave it ambiguous because
otherwise they have to address what just happened.
That's partisanship for you.
Adris Ali points out, Guantanamo Bay.
You know, the the the beak shining beacon
of freedom in this country. Right? Trump announces
that he's ordering the Department of Defense
and the Department of Homeland Security to begin
preparing Guantanamo Bay to hold 30,000 migrants.
I mean, that's just
I mean, from a,
logistical standpoint,
it's usable spot.
But just think about using Guantanamo Bay
to move a bunch of immigrants into after
our history there, guys. It's just grotesque what
these people are doing. On top of that,
which I'll show you right now, I guarantee
you, there are gonna be people that end
up there that do not belong there, whether
because they're not an illegal immigrant or whatever
else, or that there are people that languish
there, that languish there for longer than they're
supposed to because they don't know what to
do.
It's just unreal where we are right now
in this country. And it says, Guantanamo Bay
already has migrant housing facility that is separate
from where 911 detainees are held. Good story
on the facilities that are there. Go ride.
It's already set up for you. Good job.
Almost like they've been preparing.
Well, as I showed you the showed you
the other day, here's one example already.
23rd January.
City of Newark.
An ICE raid
ended up detaining a US military veteran who
suffered the indignity of having his legitimacy of
his military documentation questioned.
Now
you may argue this is a small example,
guys. Now the but the main point is
they came in
and actually, I'll read it from here since
this gets into more detail. That's just the
post from the city of Newark. It is
real, it's what they're reporting. Now of course,
we maybe they're lying, right? Maybe they made
a mistake, as always. That's anybody honest is
gonna consider those things. Right? But not ignore
it in in lieu of those things. Consider
both sides of it. Lean in for the
facts.
January 24th,
mayor accuses ICE of detaining vet.
Now it says ICE agents entering the Ocean
Food Depot restaurant where owner Louis Gianota
said around a dozen immigration authorities detained
3 people after receiving a complaint.
Great. So now we're gonna, like, basically, swat
people by so I see people that are
brown that I I mean, how would you
even know? Certainly, there may be an insight.
Maybe somebody who works there did. Right? But
you know this is gonna get out of
control if this is the kind of thing
that will happen. And this it is based
on what you see here. It says, I
asked the agents what documentation they were looking
for, and they said it was a license
or passport.
And he goes, I thought, who walks around
with a passport?
And it says, geno genota
said among the workers questioned was the manager
of the restaurant's warehouse, a Puerto Rican man
and a military veteran. Exactly what I thought.
Turns out he was brown.
Puerto Ricans are US citizens. It says, it
looks to me like they were specifically going
after certain kinds of people. Not every kind.
Because they did not ask me for my
documentation or my American workers, Portuguese workers, or
white workers. Now from a very objective point,
you're gonna say, well, yes. Because you're probably
not an immigrant. But how do they know
that? Right? If you're gonna be honest about
this, is it not possible that you were
an immigrant from Germany, or are we only
worried about certain kinds of immigrants?
I mean, let's be real about this, guys.
It's very easy to try to sidestep this
because, you know, racism is supposed to be
only for the woke Democrats. But, no, it's
just human beings that care about people. Right?
And it does exist. And a lot of
it right now is being ignored on very
clearly one side of this paradigm. The problem
is and by the way, it's on all
sides of this in a lot of different
ways. But right now, they're the power structure
that's leading the charge, and it's important to
call out. Here,
it's important to recognize that what they're doing
is apparently without warrants, by the way, according
to the mayor of Newark.
They just took people without warrants and went
after people that were brown. One of them
was a US veteran.
So if that can happen so easily, right
out of the gate, how do we not
see where this is already going?
And it says,
US immigration and cost ICE may encounter US
citizens while conducting fieldwork and may request identification
to establish an individual identity as was the
case during the targeted enforcement.
So basically, they're saying you can do we
we can ask you there just so it's
clear, you are not required
to produce identification,
constitutionally speaking. Now, yes, there's all sorts of
laws, but that's my point from before.
If it is repugnant to the constitution, it's
null and void. That doesn't mean they won't
arrest you
and put you in jail because all of
your congressional situa they all don't seem to
care, which shows you how far away we
are from any reality of constitutional
law.
I wonder why. What co what other government
out there is driving us into the ground?
Or putting people in peep in positions of
power that don't care about the constitution but
pretend they do. You know exactly.
My point is, what they're telling you is
we may ask you for your identification,
and you're now required to produce it. And
if you don't, we'll probably assume you're an
immigrant.
Get ready. It's gonna get crazy.
It says this is an active investigation,
and per ICE policy, we cannot discuss ongoing
investigation. Oh, you gotta love that, right? Except
when we want to, and we'll let a
woman walk through the crime scene before we're
even done investigating, you know, for propaganda.
Or we pretend we don't want you. It's
just it's just so inconsistent all the time,
everywhere.
But it says, by the numbers, I said
on Twitter it arrested
538 people Thursday, detained 373,
but it did not say where those raids
were conducted.
It says, Baca accused ICE of an egregious
act and of violating the 4th amendment.
Now oh, I closed it already, but from
this,
and and and it's in it's in the
article as well the point is she says
right here
without producing a warrant.
You already know where this goes.
We're watching the police state powers grow out
of control right in front of you, or
really just become what we know they are,
but we're watching them roll it out under
guise of doing what you want. Now, of
course, when democrats speak up and say they're
violating the right, they go, you're a woke
immigrant loving blah blah blah.
It's the same dumb stuff you get back
and forth. Right? So if something happens the
other way, the Democrats go, you're just a
white supremacist nazi. You're both stupid. You're both
ignorant. You're both lying to yourselves on what's
really going on so you can ignore what's
right in front of you, that your government,
all of it is tricking both of you.
That's what's actually happening.
And we can't see it as they remove
your rights in front of you.
Greg Stoker points out, ICE can now raid
churches, schools, and hospitals.
When we talk about the imperial boomerang theory,
this is what we mean. You thought normalizing
the boo the bombing of every institution
in Gaza wouldn't come back to the imperial
core?
Trump administration to allow ICE to raid previously
protected spaces.
But we're already seeing that.
Are you okay with this?
I mean, just turn around in some other
dynamic. Imagine if it was some kind of
woke dynamic that was in you know, enforcing
some element that you didn't agree with. Was
forcing us into locations and you're republican? I
mean, it doesn't have to always be so
cut and dry
or so different. Like, the reality
is you can see this is a power
structure that is abusing its power even if
you agree with the outcome.
It's what we keep talking about. They're just
doing so in ways they know you'll agree
with by and large, so then you basically
agree with them abusing their power one step
at a time, pulling pulling further and further
away from what they're we we pretend they're
bound by.
And as long as it, you know, makes
them feel stupid or we're winning or the
democrats look bad, people cheer it on.
Now I really hope people that may be
new to the show have been looking back
at our work and realize that it's not
just all republic. It's what the current when
it was Biden and and COVID-nineteen or whatever
else we were making a point about that
leading element, same thing as you far as
you go back. It's just important to see
that it's just simply about the guiding aspect
of it that I think is truly.
With one ultimate agenda.
Now, of course, JD Vance has blustering response
for Catholic bishops
who criticized ice raids in churches. Think about
this guys. You've got bishops who are criticizing
rightly so that they've allowed raids into churches.
Right? I mean, historically, even well before even
our current dynamic, there was
a,
ow, what's it called?
Do I'm blank on the word? But, you
know, when you, you know, when you can
you could go into a church
and basically call safe haven.
Right? Like, you know, you could basically from
any kind of other you know, basically, that
you would have some kind of protected element,
and people respected that.
Not today, apparently. So where are all the
Christians out there with all these lines being
crossed, but they it's okay because bad immigrants?
Sanctuary is the word I was looking for.
It's a classic concept,
but apparently no more. Now bottom line though
is that you have Catholic church
bishops
who are saying, well, this is this is
a travesty.
Even if you're going after immigrants that are
illegal, what you're doing is a big deal.
And Vance makes it about their money. Now
I'm not I'm the 1st person to point
out that there's a whole lot of corruption
and profiteering in the Catholic church.
But think think about coming from somebody right
now pretending to lead the Christian right,
Pretending to be a I don't think any
of these people are what they pretend they
are. How can you be a Christian and
then Catholic bishops speak up about you
violating the sanctity of these churches, and you
you say, ah, you're right about your money.
That sounds like what you think. That sounds
like what you are. And what we're watching
is a bunch of technocrat, elitist, oligarchs who
are literally pretending to be Christians, pretending to
be free speech advocates, pretending to not be
the government fighting against you.
Asylum would work too, Katie. That's actually I
I was thinking sanctuary, not as the sanctuary
city part, but, like, historically, just look it
up. Like, the the sanctuary is an idea
that churches would essentially protect you from persecution,
things like that.
But I guess that doesn't matter anymore. But
as the the squirrel points out, it goes,
wow. Trump will sign an executive order to
deport anyone with a student visa who spreads
transphobia,
homophobia, anti black racism, and Islamophobia.
Oh, wait. It's only to deport anyone criticizing
Israel and spreading antisemitism
because, of course, and conservatives cheer.
The point he's making is simply that if
you're gonna argue, like, why would it be
select? Right? Why would it only be about
one level, one angle of it? I think
we all know why. And that in and
of itself is hypocrisy.
It says it really is curious that antisemitism
by which is,
by which is meant, of course, criticism of
Zionism and the genocidal Israeli death cult is
the only hate speech Trump recognizes.
Constantly hysterically whines about and wants to criminalize.
Think about that at work. So this is
the woke right
on display.
Again, he says I have to stress, all
of this is just random. It's totally random
that the first foreign leader Trump invited to
the White House is Netanyahu. It's totally random
that the only right wing politicians and parties
that are allowed to win are Zionists.
Don't look any further. It's just a strange
weird coincidence. Totally arbitrary, completely random that the
only time Elon Musk has profusely apologized and
he says cucked himself over a tweet was
in relation to one specific group of people.
Totally random.
You can decide for yourself.
Unusual Wales says, Justin, Trump administration will cancel
student visas of all Hamas sympathizers
on college campuses. Another thing he said,
Hamas sympathizers. So now you're not allowed to
sympathize?
And how do you define
sympathy?
Is that support?
Or just,
you know, feeling bad for what they're going
through?
I mean, it's just ridiculous.
Bottom line is, obviously, you have the right
to support whatever group you want. I don't
care if you're talking about ISIS. If I
if you wanna say I I sympathize with
what they're going through, suddenly now you're not
allowed in this country,
lines being crossed all over the place. It's
alarming how few people speak up about some
of this stuff. In the you know, I
really put it like this. It's alarming how
many people profess to scare about the constitution
and then are too cowardly to stand up
when a challenge is like this. It's easy
to stand up for the easy moments.
Right? It's when it's when it's moments like
this that matter.
Glenn says any serious critic of Israel is
automatically deemed a Hamas sympathizer, and that's the
point.
Not critical of Jews,
critical of Israel's government actions.
Now look, if you're pretending like there's just
no part in the world that's possible, like,
that there's not somebody out there who who
is is capable of saying, look. Israel's government
committed a crime, because, of course, that's totally
not possible. Right? At the same time, doesn't
hate Jews.
Like, are are we willing to admit that's
possible out there? All you Zionist manipulators. And
is it is there someone in the world
who doesn't hate Jews, who can go, yes,
but Israel's government committed a crime?
Apparently not. Because apparently, no matter where you
look in the world, anybody says Israel just
did this and that's illegal, then, oh, you're
racist.
That's the best they can do. And it
worked for a really long time.
The reality is, as far as I could
tell, the vast, vast, vast, vast majority are
people who just wanna see them stop killing
children.
But they're racist, apparently, for saying that.
This is, by design, he says, intended to
condition work and study in the US
on either vocally expressing love for Israel or
staying silent.
Courtesy of the people claiming to restore free
speech in the United States.
K? Some people have the courage to call
it out.
Where where where you guys at?
I think the majority sees this, but what
I'm talking to when I say that are
the people who are staying quiet when you
know better. And you know who I'm talk
you know you hear me right now. I'm
not even saying it's somebody specific. I'm just
hoping that you're out there listening, and you
believe I'm talking about you.
Daniel McAdams. Change the definition of antisemitism
to include anyone critical of the actions of
a of the secular Israeli government, and then
deny free speech to those newly government minted
antisemites.
Because I thought we were entering a new
era of free speech. Isn't this the golden
age for America we're keeping told? No. No.
We're we're taking leaps and bounds in the
wrong direction.
Just screaming freedom. How often have we talked
about that?
And then the point they're talking about is
given that the US government has effectively adopted
the IHRRA
definition of antisemitism, which basically means
you can't say Zionism is Judaism, which is
like literal that's like saying black is white.
It's ridiculous. It's fundamentally,
objectively wrong.
Zionism is a political organization,
so many 100 of years old. Judaism is
35 100 years old. Okay. Are we confused?
They're not the same thing. So the fact
that they're so aggressively forcing people to pretend
they are when you know they're not is
in and of itself proof of what we're
talking about. When you have morons like Brian
Mast, there's gonna be people screaming that that's
the same thing, when you it's simply not.
You're wrong.
Plenty of orthodox Jews in the world are
calling that out. But they just keep pushing.
At to their own detriment, by the way.
Maybe not in the immediacy of them getting
showered with with Israeli praise and funding,
but at some point, they're gonna come around
and recognize that they have zero support in
this country. Other than extremists, maybe that's all
they care about.
Tiberias
says worst possible timeline.
So this guy's saying, Trump, to sign executive
order, identify, punish, and deport any semites.
Here's Elon Musk with his 100%
rabbit hole, same thing. Says universities manufacture woke
activists, and it shows kids walking in and
college pumping them out.
Like, do you realize do you know do
you think he just doesn't see how stupid
that is? Like, do you know do you
think he doesn't recognize?
Nah. I I don't think so. I think
he's very aware of what he's doing. Right?
The game is to go, the left and
the Democrats and, oh, look, Muslim pedophile, look
over there.
Right? The point though is that you're literally
doing that.
You're you're in real time doing that.
Creating a situation where people get pumped out,
but just in a different way. But if
you if you get people on guard to
only look for one thing, it's what I
was saying before. All these people screaming, oh,
look at Milay screaming about 2 genders. He
won. He beat them all. They're laughing at
you all. They're making fun of you. In
fact, Malay probably is too because he think
they're going, how stupid can you be? That
all we have to do is get up
and pretend we speak against the woke agenda
when what they're doing is literally building a
technocratic prison around you? And we're going, yay,
fight against that. Look, there are real things
to talk about there, obviously. Because there are
real actions that are at me. If you
don't know, look at my work on it.
It's monumentally important to highlight what was going
on, like, through the trans agenda. But realize
that the people that were using those things
are not fighting for 2 for multiple names
in your genders, guys. They're fighting to get
you in division tactics, to get you fighting
yourselves, to get you normalized with the idea
of transhumanism,
all sorts of different things that go so
far beyond Malay telling you there's 2 genders.
Hooray. We're winning.
Same point here. If you only focus on
the one element of it as you literally
ignore the Zionist control of the structure as
they roll this out, it's technocracy at the
end of the day, globalism,
then you're missing the bigger picture. And the
and it's not to say that this doesn't
matter. It's to say that's only a fraction
of the bigger picture.
But just how funny it is that they
would that this timeline's perfect.
Adam simply says, breaking. President Trump to sign
executive order to identify, punish, and deport antisemites.
After 249 years of existence, Israel has now
officially destroyed the First Amendment. Now, I I
get what he's saying. I don't agree. The
point is that's not something that can be
destroyed. It's an inherent god given right that's
always there. It's about whether or not your
government is respecting your rights, and they're not.
And they're not for a foreign government. Clearly
matters.
Here is an Israeli Zionist supporter who is
doing you know, they're using this because this
is the game.
Promises made, promises kept. And everybody says, The
Trump administration is actively working to identify, punish,
and deport pro terrorist students.
Right? So was it a promise kept, or
was that something they were pretending was never
gonna happen? Right? Where I would go, look
at what Trump's gonna do. And they're like,
no. You're wrong. He'll never do that. He's
a free speech warrior. He's fighting for the
constitution. He cares about us. And then rolls
out the same thing. Now, yes, you're gonna
get the extremists in his circle that are
fighting for Zionism and they're gonna go, Yeah.
Like this guy.
But is that is that a promise you
thought he was making and now you're glad
he kept? By and large, I would argue
no. I I think most conservatives are going,
damn it. This does not feel right.
Whether or not you agree with what they
pretend these people are supporting or not, you
know damn well in your heart that at
that you only believe in free speech if
you're willing to defend the worst of speech.
Period. And so this guy is trying to
get you on this train. And, really, it's
about Zionists going, we're winning, and then you
you pee and then people are following along.
Well, let's talk about this from Horetz. K?
This is Horetz covering this point. Trump's executive
order on antisemitism to largely focus on pro
Palestinian
protesters.
Funny how Haaretz is one that has shown
itself through all this, surprisingly enough, to be
like the only voice willing to highlight somewhat
the truth of Israel itself.
Meanwhile, your western politicians and media
are,
cowardly hiding on the other side of this
conversation.
Well, Israel's new Haaretz newspaper, one of the
leading papers in Israel, was calling it out
more than anybody. And they're they'll talk about
a story as if it's not happening, and
they'll blatantly tell in the headline.
Killed him. You know? I mean, how many
different stories from the flower massacre
openly telling you what's happening, and and you
got morons like Matt Miller pretending like we
don't know for sure as it's being publicly
stated by an IDF member?
As always, they know what they're doing. Matt
Miller knows what he's doing.
Now either they sleep like a baby because
they're an absolute sociopath, or I hope they
struggle every night to sleep because they're such
a horrible person. I hope they struggle, but
something tells me they don't.
Trump's executive order. A White House document obtained
by Herets shows that Trump executive order aims
to take unprecedented
steps to combat,
quote, the explosion of antisemitism,
which we've already proven.
And the term, the name, the everything comes
from that one claim of 400%.
The cloud of em oh, yeah. That turned
out to be all Palestinian flags, Palestinian protests.
Anybody saying anything, even Palestinian adjacent, was deemed
an anti Semitic event, anti Semitic event, and
then was included in that number. Just like
when they spoke to everybody that was in
January 6th, and every one of those interviews
was a domestic terrorism interview. They got a
spike of domestic terrorism.
Same thing.
It's so easy. But, of course, people that
want to believe it will pretend it's the
case, like the Democrats did at that time,
and now we got Republicans leaning into this
because it works.
You all fall for it because partisan manipulation
seems to be the game.
Bottom line,
explosion of antisemitism was nothing of the kind.
It was a bunch of lies and manufactured
illusions, which we're gonna get into next because
that's what they do.
The ADL, Zionism, and the Israeli government. It
says including the ability to revoke student visas.
It says according to the White House fact
sheet obtained by Herets,
Trump's order,
quote, takes forceful and unprecedented steps to marshal
all federal resources
to combat the explosion
of antisemitism
on our campuses, in our streets since October
7th. So even right there. Because, you know,
you get the talking points.
And that becomes only students, only foreign. That's
not what it says. If you look at
this, if you read it,
it's clear that he says all federal resources
to combat the explode okay. So right there,
in and of itself, is not constitutional.
To combat
racism
is not constitutional. People have a right to
think and feel what they want, especially since
we know that what they're aiming at is
not even actually racism. It's simply support for
Palestine.
My point either way, as always, is you
have a right to feel and think what
you want. They're simply telling you you do
not
if it has to do with Israel.
Gotta be the most obvious thing we've ever
seen. Your government tells you you can't do
what you want is is if if you
bump up against Israel. You have your rights,
but not if you're gonna say things bad
about Israel. Right? You can protest, but not
if it's about Israel.
Right? You can have support from this hurricane,
but only if you sign pledging not to
go against Israel. That was Texas.
Governor Abbott, governor Abbott during Harvey.
We talked about this then. People were signing
things saying you had to pledge not to
boycott Israel, otherwise, you wouldn't get government aid
from your tax dollars.
My god. This has to be so obvious.
But going forward,
it says the order notably seized through Trump's
campaign bow to deport
pro Palestinian
protesters
in America
on student visas, the administration's latest
dramatic step with significant implications on first amendment
issues and immigration policy.
Great great how the Israeli platform is the
one seemingly the only one willing to call
this out. But it says, I will I,
quote, I will issue clear orders to my
attorney general, another pro Zionist manipulator, to aggressively
prosecute
terroristic threats,
arson,
vandalism,
violence against American Jews.
So right there, the point is this is
what he's saying, not exactly what's written. The
bottom line is what this ends up being
is the broad people will take it as
only if they break the law, but that's
not what it says. It just does not
only it says simply it's a lot of
vague language to combat antisemitism.
But it says to all the resident aliens
who joined in the pro jihadist protests, which
is not what they were,
it's dishonest at its core, and frankly, I
think he knows that, we put you on
notice. It says, come 2025, we will find
you and we will deport you. I will
also quickly cancel the student visas of all
Hamas sympathizers on Cali so right there, it's
very clear. Which have been infested with radicalism.
So what's funny is the top part,
they'll lean into and say, see, he means
only crimes.
But then if I point to the bottom
and say, but see, he said right there,
well, that's not what the bill says.
Both ways. But, ultimately, the reality is clear.
Student visa are not
sympathizers
or if you join a protest
that's not pro jihadists, it's it's Palestinian self
determination.
But just to be clear, I'm sure there's
a protest you could find out there that
I mean, what does it even look like
pro jihadists? I've never seen one. I'm sure
they exist somewhere, just being objective, but pretty
sure that's I've never seen one where they're
like, yay. Let's go commit terrorism.
It just seems so stupid. These people are
jokes. My point is, sure, something like that
exists somewhere, probably the Fed or probably the
Mossad. But the point is overall,
we know for a fact there were people
that were going, we want peace. And it
was being led by, let's say, Jews for
Peace, for example. Right? Or the other Jewish
organizations that were fighting for these protests that
were being framed as racist.
They called them pro jihadist.
So right there is an example of one
that's not provably, that was pro Palestinian freedom
that they called pro jihadist, and all they're
saying is if you simply were there, you
get deported.
So just to be clear, if you simply
show up at a protest where you're fighting
for them to be free, you're gonna get
deported by Trump.
In this case,
which is which is true when you know
that. It's very clear what they're doing.
Every which way you look at this, it
is a violation of your whether a visa
or not.
And it says, and the United States must
ensure that admitted aliens and aliens otherwise already
present in the United States do not bear
hostile attitudes
towards its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding
principles, and do not advocate for aid or
support designated foreign terrorists and other threats to
our national security. There's so many ways to
take that.
Hostile attitudes. So, you know, that's that's not
how this works. You don't get to decide
what people can feel. It's not how it
works. You could argue that there's a law
being broken,
but to simply say that we're gonna get
you we're gonna you deport you because you
don't like us? Guys, that's ideological
you are an ideological tyrant. You're telling people
they can't think and feel what they want.
Isn't that what we're all trying to get
at? We're watching our government build a situation
where they're trying to dictate how you could
think and feel?
Just because they're pointing at people you pretend
aren't on you're on a visa. Like, it's
so easy to other these people and make
it about how they're just the bad guy
until it becomes your problem. Until suddenly you're
saying the thing they don't want you to
say.
So obvious. But, say, I feel like I'm
like, do I really have to go through
this again? We've gone for years. We know
this is coming.
It says US National Security Advisor Mike Waltz
detailed the administration's medium term broader effort at
combating antisemitism during the transition
forecasting
a cross governmental effort to combat radicalization,
where the US government will quote,
look at mosques,
individuals,
universities,
professors,
you name it, he says,
that post a threat to the United States
and are radicalizing individuals to harm the United
States.
Who post a threat?
I wonder if I wonder if he said
pose a threat.
So I'm not I don't know how often
you see mosques and universities
posting. You know what I mean? Like,
to me, this is them simply saying we're
profiling. And I think you damn well know
that's what's happening, whether Biden or Trump,
for a foreign government.
Individual professors, mosques, you name it. He says
Trump's new order further calls upon every federal
executive department and agency lee leader to review
and report
every single department, guys,
within 60 days,
quote, on all criminal and civil authorities and
actions available for fighting antisemitism.
Does it sound like we're gonna go after
the sim the individual? This is a entire
implementation
for every single group
to to basically put a report forward in
60 days on what they can do with
every resource they have to fight antisemitism, to
fight an idea that you're allowed to feel
and think.
This should be very alarming to anybody who
actually sees what's hap or really anybody that's
not being dishonest with themselves. This is exactly
what it seems like.
Make it antisemitism, make it about something else.
You're they're picking something that is that an
idea, a thought, and saying, not this one.
Not allowed.
That's a problem,
and you damn will know it.
It further stipulates immediate action from the Department
of Justice, quote, to protect law and order,
quell projemos vandalism and intimidation,
and investigate and punish anti Jewish racism and
leftist anti American colleges. Oh, totally not bi
or, you know, partisan driven.
Those leftist anti American groups.
Are you serious? Like, think about how gross
this is. Like, if you wanna recognize like,
they're they're trying to pretend like it's only
these leftist colleges.
The vast majority of the people that were
protesting were there to promote Palestinian freedom.
What's hilarious to me is you got this
major thread through their group that has a
very obvious racist tendency, who Israel called out
moments ago. Red hats, you antisemites.
And here you are turning around and pointing
at who they tell you to. Are you
really that easy to manipulate?
Trump's new executive order describes the action as
Trump going on the offend offensive to enforce
law and order to protect civil rights. Is
that that's what they point to.
He just said the words. That's what he's
doing. No. It's not. It's because he says
things out loud. Don't make them the truth.
What he's doing is the opposite of that.
He's going in the offensive to enforce what
Israel wants against law and order, against your
rights. And it says immediately after the jihadist
terrorist attacks against people of Israel on October
7th. Oh, so now you're instituting legal action
in this country for a foreign government's
for what happened on October for, you know,
an attack on a foreign government?
Well, think about that. That's like is that's
like any other country instituting some kind of
a law because of
September 11th.
It seems it seems interesting. And it says
pro Hamas, aliens, and left wing radicals begin
a campaign of intimidation, vandalism.
They're making this completely about the left.
Does that seem alarming to anybody? It says
celebrating Hamas,
and here's where it gets interesting.
Celebrating Hamas' mass rape, which never happened,
kidnapping, and murder.
It continues. They physically block Jewish Americans from
attending college classes. You know how many times
they've lied about that? Where they've
intentionally tried to go through their group when
they when the faster route was around them.
It's it's just it's lazy.
But people like this are going along with
it because they're either bought off, paid for,
influenced, or lying for their own agenda.
It says, obstructed synagogues and assaulted worshipers. I
mean, you don't know how many like, in
my experience, of course, you could argue that
I'm lying or missing something. I've looked into
this from the beginning, and it's objectively clear
that the vast majority of all those things
were happening from Zionist manipulators
against anybody, including other Jews who are protesting
there, Many of which spoke up, including holocaust
survivors that were there and said these people
are the problem.
But, yeah, but he he must be a
racist. Right? That makes sense.
It says the White House further linked its
plans to combat domestic antisemitism with Trump's vow
vows
to move the US embassy
in Israel to Jerusalem and brokering Abraham Accords.
Great. So he's literally telling you, I am
fighting to suppress your speech for Israel's objectives,
which most of which are illegal, including the
Israel Embassy in Jerusalem.
All they do not have the power to
do this, guys. The bottom line is all
of this is suppressing your rights for a
foreign government.
It could not be more clear. This, on
its face, we told you was coming, and
you many of you pretend that it was
never going to happen.
Now here, we we have to wait for
him to actually sign this.
And when he does,
unfortunately, it'll be one more step in this
direction, which has been building for a very
long time.
Tim Lord on simply points out that Donald
Trump,
he claims as an antisemite. Why? And that
he should be deported. Why? Because he funds
the killing of Semites in Palestine.
Now he's making the the point about how
what they pretend a Semite is is not
even remotely what they what it is. A
Semite is a member of any of the
peoples who speak
or spoke a Semitic language, including in particular,
the Jews and Arabs.
Now what's funny about that is that the
Jews ultimately again, we're talking about a religion
here, guys. We're not talking about an ethnicity.
The bottom line, though, is that Palestinians
are Semites.
But what's ridiculous today is now they pretend
that all of these people, most of which
aren't from the actual location in Israel,
like, you know, the Polish leader Netanyahu,
are not actually Semites. In this case, we're
actually dealing with Semites,
and they're the ones being killed. And so
what he's saying is, okay, if we're gonna
talk about antisemitism,
well, Donald Trump is literally killing
Semites,
or paying for that to happen just like
Biden did. Here's this clip of all these
different all these are doctors, by the way,
and I I have more I need to
add. I just haven't gotten to it. All
these clips are doctors all telling you the
same thing. Israel's killing children. Israel's killing doctors.
Israel has committed genocide. Every single one of
them.
He says they were never never they will
never be able to bury Israel's corruption. Listen
to these 40 doctors.
Now on top of that, guys,
these are just other clips that are important
to include in all this, which are the
biometric wall he's talking about, him containment to
support the shot right up until today, telling
you it's saving lives even though it's not.
We all know that as he rolls out
the mRNA cancer shots. Here he is saying
we have to shut the Internet down in
2016, work with Bill Gates because, you know,
ISIS is what's the point at the time.
And what he what he said, you're gonna
people will scream free speech to those stupid
people is what he says. Or
firearms due process later, he says in that
clip. And this clip was the recent one,
2024, saying the same thing he did up
there, that stupid people will say it's unconstitutional
when you burn the flag and get put
in jail. No. It's been roundly argued, proven,
rather just roundly ruled by the Supreme Court
that it is not against the it is
a constitutional right.
Now you could disagree. I also think it's
it's, you know,
insulting, I guess? Distasteful?
For any flag, the point is that people
have, you know, very clearly people in any
country fight for these things and distaste, you
know, do so is an insult. But it
is a right.
And he says it doesn't matter because that's
not what he wants.
That is authoritarianism, guys. That is imperialism. That's
what he's doing. And here we are.
Free and screaming for it because that's what
you've been told.
Well, here is Noam, who we've played before,
telling you the same thing. She came out
early. This is Noam's state of, of South
Dakota.
And he says it has a Jewish population
of 0.08%.
And now she's Trump's head of Homeland Security,
intent on making her South Dakota censorship national.
As she rolls out the same dynamic.
Well, and this is before. I don't know
you guys could see me the whole time.
Forgot that was up.
Where here we go. So this is Noam
saying
the same kind of dynamic of the antisemitism
laws. And so this is
a place where there's point o 8%.
I mean, this has to matter for the
bigger conversation.
Good morning, everyone. My name is governor Kristi
Noem, and I'm so thrilled to see all
of you here this morning.
Thank you for being here to honor such
a special occasion where we sign a bill
that will define antisemitism
and how we can continue to make sure
that we're standing against acts of hatred and
standing in solidarity with our Israeli community and
the Jewish people.
We are going to have a few speakers
to share with us. Now Now she goes
on to introduce the the rabbi and so
on. The point is simply about the fact
that she's rolling this out. And we this
is before it even got you know, it's
obvious why these people are being chosen.
All we're all we're talking about the idea
is passing a legislation that argues that you're
not allowed to say certain things or think
certain things. It's very simple.
Like, so if you're gonna pretend like we
should have a law that says you're not
allowed to say certain antisemitic things, why wouldn't
there be a law that says you're not
allowed to say Islamophobic things?
Or any other racist statements. Why why is
one unique versus the other?
Like, if no matter how you try to
make that argument, no matter how much you
think it makes sense, it's racist. You're literally
arguing that one thing is more important than
the other. It's simple. And you probably very
much think that. And you almost probably think
that it's bad or insulting for me to
say that's not the case. It simply continues
to show the supremacy around this conversation, and
I do not believe that's unique to Jewish
people. I think it's unique to Zionism who
are manipulating both Jewish and Christian people. But
it is obvious that it is part of
the conversation.
And I'll I'll even show you this before
I show you this article here.
For those that are already very aware that
Israel is an apartheid state as ruled by
Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and B'Tselem, the
leading human rights group in the world. This
is the leading human rights group in Israel,
B'Tselem, the Israeli Information Center on Human Rights.
And it says, from 2021,
a regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan
River to the Mediterranean Sea. This is apartheid.
It's important to recognize. That's not a racist
statement, guys. These are this is found by
every human rights group in the world, essentially.
So this is from 2024
about it's, January last year.
Anti Defamation League staff decried
dishonest campaign against Israel critics. That's people within
the ADL.
The point is they were actively going after
people just because they didn't like their views.
You already know this, though. Right? Because we've
played many different clips from ADL, like the
leaked clip from Greenblatt,
but also the ones from, the inter the,
documentary from James Lee. Here's just the one
of Greenblatt.
I also
wanna point out that we have a major,
major,
major
generational problem. All the polling I've seen, ADL's
polling,
ICC's
polling,
independent polling
suggests
this is not a left right gap, folks.
The issue in United States and support for
Israel is not left and right.
It is young and old,
And so we really have a TikTok problem,
a Gen Z problem that our community needs
to put. The same brains that gave us
Tagli,
the same brains that gave us all these
other amazing innovations
need to put our energy towards this, like,
fast, and, again, like we've been chasing this
left, right divide.
It's the wrong
game.
The real game of the next generation.
We saw a dramatic change in the language
of the activists here in America on October
8th.
The language of groups that we've long tracked
have long been problematic,
like Students for Justice in Palestine and Jewish
Voice For Peace.
The language I could show you from their
toolkits
because our analysts are in their groups.
We saw this again on October 8th. It
was that fast.
Like the language in their toolkits
was all about the Zionist entities.
Right. I mean, if there's a lot of
important things in there. Right? We played that
before.
He's literally telling you
that it's not they they want you to
think it's a partisan thing. It's not. They're
very clear, and that's why TikTok was manipulated.
And I clearly, I I think we all
see where it's going.
Musk or some other element is gonna
war is gonna wrap it into the US
intelligence apparatus, Oracle, something like that. It's just
gonna be one more part of this very
same thing we're telling you is coming, which
seems to have been the plan. It's very
hard to miss.
But he's telling you that it's not just
the, you know, one side or the other.
It's it's it's a growing awareness from the
younger groups. But he also makes it very
clear in case you missed the most important
part that I'll I'll play the clip from
James Lee right now that the ADL is
a spy organization. It's very clear. They have
spies in American Jewish groups.
Think about how wild that is. An Israeli
nth group is has spies
inside Jewish organizations because
because because that is fighting for Jewish people?
No. It's Zionism that's afraid of Jewish people
that see what they are.
Is an Israeli spy organization masking around as
a supposed civil rights group and doing real
harm to the Jewish community writ large in
order to run cover for the state of
Israel.
So have the power to monitor social media
activity across all major platforms and change social
media algorithms the way they see fit. Don't
believe me? Well, here's Jonathan Greenblatt, the CEO
of the ADL. We work with YouTube to
have we to get them to change their
algorithms.
We work with Facebook on trying to use
a redirect method. So when you search for
holocaust, you get directed to, like, a Yad
Vashem
page.
We opened
a center in Silicon Valley back in 2017,
and the woman who runs it, she's the
next Facebook executive.
I have software engineers and data scientists working
at ADL.
We're monitoring
all this stuff, and we're working with all
the platforms, by the way. Google and YouTube
and Meta and Twitter and Reddit and Steam
and Amazon. All these
Right to this day, by the way, Yackarino
and Musk are still working with the ADL
on the record.
Why isn't that alarming to the very people
screaming up free speech? I don't know. Now
going back to the point from before.
As again, to reiterate, as Truthstream Media points
out, you know, June Slater saying, what if
they're deliberately letting all this happen in order
to to justify more surveillance? Not just one
side, guys.
All of it. Your government. Through Biden to
Trump, and now more so than ever.
Allowing the very thing. And, again, to if
you to really whether you agree with it
or not, just take a step back and
at least consider the possibility
that Biden
was meant to allow the immigration situation to
to fester, to become a problem so it
could then have to be dealt with.
Think about it. And now here we are
as they're rolling out the exact same thing
they pretended they were fighting.
As True Street Media says, that's how the
biometric entry exit wall will get a public
seal of approval.
After years of unpunished illegal immigration and border
agents pretending,
they suddenly forgot their jobs, cutting fences and
fist bumping people on the way in.
So
bringing this into the part that I think
is most important, the
engineering of it all.
Now we talked about weaponized migration and experimentation.
This is titled tools for subversion, division, and
manufacturing consent. We also talked about one of
the provable examples I think is very important
in all this, that back on June June
January of last year,
there was a
assist, a what was claimed to be a
Palestinian man from Hamas who was coming through
the southern border, and he was say cryptically
saying, you will know my name.
And the the right went all crazy about
it. Until it very quickly was shown that
he actually worked for Assad, was recruiting for
Assad, and I think it was in Jordan.
I forget the I've I've it's been a
while since we talked about this. I did
the same thing last time. The bottom line
is all these source materials in here, it's
very clear. It was very quickly shown that
it was an old the image they were
showing
wasn't the person was older. It's clear he
wasn't him. We found out it was actually
a person who was provably on the record
recruiting for Assad and caught for it and
held accountable for it. And then suddenly the
the story went away.
So what was that?
Well, it seems pretty clear to me. It
was a person that seems to have been
working on behalf of Israel to tell you
Palestinians and Hamas were coming to the southern
border. Why? Because that's what they wanted you
to think, and they were all even Trump
said that. And now they're telling you Al
Qaeda's hotbeds are inside this country. Well, who
do they who do they work for?
Israel and United States. It is in its
proxy element for both of them. We've proven
this. So my point is, keeping this in
mind, I I think it's quite obvious what's
going on.
So PBT points out something very interesting.
Accounts are getting direct messages in which they're
being asked to post staged fake Muslim terror
attacks for money.
Now what's frustrating is this account
had this posted. I went over this the
other day and I was looking at all
these different screenshots, had all this different information.
Now the post is gone. So what's frustrating
is that I keep and we just talked
about this. Right? Who was it we,
I forget who it is now. They basically
were telling you, look, I keep posting these
things, and then my account goes down. Oh,
it was, I think it was
Moran. For one of the guys pro Palestinian
accounts. No. Larger one. I forget what the
name. I think it was Saeed something. I
forget which one it was. But simply saying,
look, every time I post these things,
my my account gets taken away. They say
I have to delete the post, and I
I can't get my account back till the
next day.
So I that's happening right now. We're and
and nobody sees it. And how do you
prove it? The point is that they're making
you delete it, and then so who knows
if that's what happened here? But either way,
I think it's interesting to think about. And
I know for a fact this is happening
in a general sense, that people are being
paid or influenced to carry out false information
like, you know, Vistrograd and Elon Musk, Provably,
whether Venezuela, whether in Europe, all over this
conversation.
Constantly being and Elon Musk has been called
out for. Even Twitter has fact checked him
and he's still constantly, seemingly by design, shares
from that account whenever seems to be told
to.
But this case, as I want you to
think about whether this is an agenda based
on the obvious. Not that it's not possible
that there is extremists in every dynamic,
but that simply there's an agenda, that somebody
benefits from convincing people in this country that
there's a Muslim extremist problem.
When we stand back,
we can see where all of this really
does stem from. Right? Whether we're talking about
Al Qaeda or ISIS or anything else, that
we can see that ultimately,
most of this does come from one clear
location.
I think the Zionists have used it and
brought it, in fact, to the area. Terrorism
as we know it today, the planting of
bombs and marketplaces and so on and so
forth, was in fact introduced into the Middle
East by the Zionists in the twenties.
But the net result of of Zionist,
terrorism and and violence in the in the
1st 3rd of 20th century has brought forth,
to my mind, the the anomaly,
the horrific and
unacceptable status in the Middle East today of
the state of Israel, which is in fact
an armed garrison state, which now exports more
arms and distributes violence all around the world,
vastly disproportionate to its size. I mean, in
that respect, I think it's a it's it's
a horrible cycle
of of violence. But in it all, I
think the Palestinian is the victim. That's our
question about that. Here's Avi Shlaim talking about
the manipulation of Iraqi Jews.
Iraqi Jews
were convinced
that Israel had a hand in uprooting them.
After the 1948
war, there was
mounting popular hostility
towards the Jews in Iraq. Five bombs exploded
in Jewish sites. The series of bombs
created a panic which led more and more
Jews to register
to leave the country. I met an elderly
friend of my mother's.
An Iraqi Jew called Yaakov
Khalkukli
who had been in the Zionist underground.
One member of his group, Yosef Basri,
a very very intelligent,
Jewish lawyer and his assistant Shalom Salah Shalom
were responsible
for 3 out of the 5 bombs.
Basri's controller
was an Israeli
intelligence
officer named Max Binet,
who was based in Tehran.
Now it looks Elon Levy apparently is sharing
something today. I'll probably do it when the
next shows about that very that very story.
Like, try to pretend like my relative well,
you're lying, man. It it's everything the zi
of the Zionist history seems to be a
fabrication.
But this is where it gets into super
contentious stuff that I think is important to
cover
because of how real and obvious and provable
this is. And this goes into the fake
extremist elements,
but also the undeniable overlap,
collaboration between
Zionism
and Nazism.
It's important to not shy away from how
very easy this is to see. Now this
Vivid account is one of these apparently,
I'm not you can look at it for
yourself. Like, apparently, people did this whole breakdown
where this is some guy in India who's
just being paid to life for Israel and
Zionism, which is pretty much what we're accustomed
to. But he who knows? The point is
he's a Zionist account that's constantly lying about
what's going on. And he says, the Nazis
were completely annihilated in World War 2 because
the world fully realized they were an enemy
of civilization and a threat to the entire
world. Why can't the world realize the same
about Hamas?
It's like, well, that's not true, first of
all. They did not get annihilated. They literally
became the foundation for for for NASA, operation
paperclip.
And, obviously, like, it's just these people are
just inherent liars. One thing we'll go over
in the next show is how I think
it's actually the same account. Is is is
literally sharing
a like, a cutout from a Hitler speech,
but framing it with Palestinians. Like, there's a
quote that's basically a paraphrasing of something Hitler
was saying about how, you know, it's the
same idea. You know, they keep saying how
nobody wants to take the Palestinians. None of
the Arab countries wanna take them, which shows
you what they really are. That's basically exactly
the kind of narrative Hitler was putting out
about the Jews at the time, which just
shows you how
it's like they want you to see the
kind of mentality they had. They they you're
emulating exactly what you pretend that you're fighting.
It's it's crazy to me.
Either way, the point is that's not true
in general on top well, in any context,
really. And he said, why can't the world
realize this about Hamas? Well, first of all,
Israel funds Hamas. And has funded Hamas all
the way up until October 7th. Right? That's
important. You know, I haven't played that in
a while. Might as well play just a
part of it real quickly.
Because the truth is it's important for people
to remember that if you don't
and and that's in no way meant to
invalidate the legal act of armed resistance. That's
also important because that's the case. There was
it no matter what the reality on the
grid point is, Palestinians
or anybody they're fighting alongside had the right
to legal armed resistance according to the Fortuna
Convention International Law.
That does not change.
Whether Israel funded some of them or not.
I I think that since 2006, a lot
has changed. I think Israel is still in
showing how inept it is today, was still
trying to influence certain outcomes, maybe to this
point, maybe some of them involved October 7th.
Who knows? Clearly, there's a lot of anomalies.
But nonetheless, it's important to recognize that they
funded Hamas to make sure they kept them
divided. So if you're gonna talk about any
of this, including October 7th, Israel is responsible.
So are you saying Benjamin Netanyahu deliberately
boosted Hamas to try to prevent a Palestinian
state? Yeah. Sure. He deliberately
and systematically
even even told this on record
whoever wants to avoid
the threat
of a 2 state solution
has to support my policy of paying protection
money to the Hamas. So what we did,
with the permission
of our prime minister is
to let
Qatar
to transfer
a huge amount of money in cash,
probably more than $1,400,000,000.
By doing it, we increase the power of
Hamas.
We
did everything in order to make sure that
Hamas will go on controlling Gaza,
and Palestinian authority
will control the West Bank so they will
fight each other.
And that is on the record.
Here's the tweet from Herets
from October 9, 2023.
Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of
Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas. This
is our strategy. Part of our strategy.
Guys all know this, but it's funny how,
you know, we talk about this and we
get new viewers. You know? It's these these
some of these things are big deal. They've
never seen that before. And, well, how is
that possible? It's crazy.
So the point
is that, first of all, obviously, you know,
they funded it. So how is not realized
about Hamas? Well, the the game is that
you're actually fighting the Palestinian as a people.
But I simply argue or or posted. I'll
just leave this here, which is the show
I did entitled Nazi Zionism versus Nazism,
Israel's connection to extremist ideology and ADL's history
of faking Nazi marches. We're gonna focus on
the first and the last today.
There's the actual show.
You know, very contentious.
Obviously, because of all the propaganda. The reality
is, it's one of the easiest things to
prove in this conversation.
So first, just a clip here that I've
I'll show you just a part of it.
I think this is a sure one. I'll
play this one. This is this is this
is a reality that I'll I'll prove to
you with the actual news articles. The fact
is the ADL was caught faking Nazi marches.
It's actually very it's a pretty public conversation.
And I'll just go go through the actual
documentation
from even the Jewish Telegraph Agency.
This one is the, what was this one?
I'll I'll show you in a second. And
here here's even
a her, a a,
Heretz article
talking about how they tried to recruit
or how they did ultimately recruit
anybody,
whether it was the Soviet Union or, in
this case, the Nazi Germany, as long as
they got what they wanted. It's important. You
can't you can't decouple that from where we
are today. So here's this clip first.
You may remember in February 1979,
there was a big uproar
because someone by the name of James Gutman
applied for a permit
to lead a march of Nazis through downtown
Philadelphia.
Now eventually, some enterprising reporters did an investigation.
You know what they turned up? James Gutman
was none other than Mordecai Levy,
who worked
with the anti defamation league and later split
off that to form the terrorist Jewish defense
league.
This was an operation that was run by
the ADL.
They wanted to have a Nazi march in
Philadelphia.
Why?
Because how can they raise money to justify
their existence
if American Jews don't think there's a lot
of anti Semitism?
So what better thing to do than to
slap
swastikas on a couple of people, leave them
on a march through town, and then the
next day, the ADL comes marching in and
says, look, there are Nazis on the street.
You need to give us money so we
can protect you.
And then
on top of that,
have a tax exempt status. This was not
a one time operation.
And here here is one of the
many of this,
ADL provocateurs
at work inciting Nazi rallies.
Where there's right there. Mordecai Levy, a paid
operative of ADL fact finding division. Now it
goes in to talk about there's multiple examples
of this. Philadelphia. There's one Chicago.
There's one or what? There's another one too.
Hold on.
Well, basically, and it talks about Guttmann. Right?
It's the name he mentioned as well. Here's
this is from the Jewish Telegraph Agency. Nazi
march turns out to be a hoax. James
Guttmann. You know? We've gone over this in-depth.
Watch the show I just highlighted. Nazism versus
Zionism. It's very clear.
Here is Israel
funding the Azov Movement, which overlaps with the
conversation as well. This is from 2018,
literally saying rights groups demand Israel stop arming
Neo Nazis.
That's the Azov Movement right there.
And the reason that's important, guys, is because
it shows you the extension of this that
goes well beyond
even just ADL kinda faking Nazi elements to
get support, but literally funding Nazi groups, like,
literal, actual groups that are carrying out Nazi
actions against individuals. Or let's just say,
you know, fascist or neo Nazi because they're
not literal parts of the neo of the
Nazi party. Right? Because that's words have meaning.
But, nonetheless,
this is very clearly what they all support,
and this is the same thing. Whether they're
supporting the most radical elements of the Islamic
culture, they pretend like, they're stoking the things
they want to use to rationalize what they
are, whether that's in Christianity, Judaism, or Islam.
That's what this that's what Zionism is doing.
As Dave and Ike and I talked about
in regard to Saboteanism.
So if I get that to come up.
How do you spell that again?
This is the research. Hold on. Why wouldn't
that pop up?
Let's see if it comes up here.
That's frustrating. Oh, well. Let me try to
grab let me try to search that as
we're going through
this.
Let's see.
The reason I think,
might be important.
What David I talked about in this conversation
here we go. Let me try it just
like that.
Is that ultimately saboteism as a as a,
you know, kind of a foundational element of
people argue
there we go.
Oh, I guess I didn't put the title.
That's why. I thought I did. That's weird.
Here, I'll include Adam's interview on this as
well. Had a good interview with that. So
this was David Eich interview, Zionism, infiltration of
Judaism, weaponization, weaponized migration, and mainstream alt media.
And this is where we get into this
very point. It's it's a very interesting conversation
because it's
he argues the cornerstone, like, a foundational part
of Zionism, Nazism, and communism.
And then this one is an interview with
Adam Green, which I thought was also very
interesting.
Religious prophecies in Israel, Zionism versus Judaism, and
Abrahamic religions.
I'll share that one too.
Include those for you.
Now going forward, the point is remember finding
the Azov movement or any number of radical
elements.
This has been going on for a long
time. As they are wrote here 2022, not
just Azov. Documents prove the CIA has been
cultivating fascism in Ukraine since at least 1948.
Now that dovetails very clearly with the Zionist
entity as it they grow into more influential
entity.
This one is a this this just shows
you the overlapping of this
Israel,
US, CIA type agenda that becomes
real for you.
Buffalo shooter linked to the Azov movement.
And I this was I wrote as the
clumsy banal ISIS agenda stumbles forward. They really
were trying to make this the case. But
realize, guys, the the overlap to what we're
seeing in the Azov Movement, to the group,
to their funding elsewhere, the Syrian extremists. And
this is the same thing, guys. How do
you explain this other than recognizing that Israel
is trickling out these little these little
events in this country to justify these actions?
And US is using them.
I mean, you could look at the US
doing them do the same way, but I
think it's very clear who benefits the most
from this at the expense of everybody else.
This one was 2023.
CIA is creating, fostering, and seeding neo Nazi
extremists into the US.
This was the blood tribe. It's like some
Patriot Front spin off. When this this even
had that guy, Hanson Troot, there that pretended
his whole entire career not not to be
racist, and he's in there with Zig Heiling
with his Nazi symbols. It's like, these people
are FBI agents as far as I'm concerned,
or some other intelligence apparatus. If you've watched
as long as we have and watched these
groups, they are the ones who used to
jump in your chats and tell you to
name the Jew. Like, these guys were literally
trying to pretend like they weren't this.
They were trying to trap you into this.
It's the same ones today trying to drive
you into thinking it's all about Jewish people.
Through the truth that we can see, it
stops short of recognizing it's Zionism abusing that
because they want you to fall for that
trap. That's how they we're gonna get into
it right now.
Here's now this by the way, this also
overlaps. I'll include this show. Who is behind
the the Moscow Crocus City Hall attack? That
talks about ISIS k. Just another example of
what I think is another prop up, cut
out, fake entity that they're building and they're
using these things, which I think is gonna
come into play. Where they're all Al Qaeda
in the US game they're playing with the
CIA right now. But this is where I
think it'll play. This is from January 13th.
US blacklists, white supremacists, Terragram
as a terrorist group.
Terragram.
Flat joke, by the way. United States on
money designated as a terrorist group, Terragram,
a white supremacist network accused of orchestrating attacks
around the world. The move by I mean,
to me I mean, who knows? It could
be organic. But to me, it sounds exactly
like the the the dumb
kind of half
shortsighted,
assumptive, reactive propaganda we've gotten accustomed to from
Israel. Terragram.
Like, that's what they think that's how they
that's how they think you think.
They are the dumb, juvenile, childish, unexperienced.
Like, that's they're the ones projecting their their
you know, that's that's how I read anyway.
Like, the it's it's like a bunch of
white men in an advertising room,
80 year you know, old white men in
suits deciding they know what's hip for a
bunch of young kids. That's what I think
the that's the equivalent of Israel sending out
their dumb propaganda in the world where we're
going, telegram?
Really?
It's just I think it's stupid, but I
could be definitely wrong. Same as watching these
Patriot Front idiots walk around with their ridiculous
things like we can't clearly tell that it's
some organized effort. But that's, again, my opinion.
But the move by the outgoing administration of
Joe Biden,
who has vowed to fight racism, puts the
transnational group in the same group as blacklisted
terrorist groups that are predominantly, but not exclusively,
Islamist.
So from one of the first examples of
these groups being added alongside the Islamist entities,
the state department has also designated the terrorists
3, terror the as terrorists, 3 alleged leaders
of Telegram of Terragram.
Cyril Daniel, whatever. I'm sure the names will
become eventually important.
United States remains deeply concerned about the racially,
ethnically motivated violence extremists.
You know, except Israel though. Got it. Okay.
Other than the ongoing genocide where they're doing
everything for racially ethnically motivated actions, starving entire
population. That one's okay though. We're only worried
about the fake version. Understood.
So here's what it says on Wikipedia.
Teragram,
I just came to laughing. This is a
stupid name. Is a key communications forum
for individuals and networks attached to, guess what,
the Ottawafen division, the base, and other explicit
militant accelerationist
groups. Or you mean others that we have
in our little catalog of fake entities that
we've grown through our FBI Mossad organization.
That's how I think about it anyway. Well,
guys, if you haven't known this already, I
I I I will probably go deeper into
this at some point when we go further
on this group. But we've gone so far
on this
in regard to the base, in regard to
the other Waffen division, in regard to the,
what was the other one?
All the Azov movement elements.
These things are directly
tied back to what we've talked about. I've
made this network undeniably clear. The same thing
that people like Laura Loomer tried to co
opt and pretend it didn't involve Israel because
they're desperately co opted by Israel. The point
is very clear that these groups are all
interconnected to the very same thing that the
you remember like the point about like the
rise above movement.
Oh, you see this pops up.
There you go look at that. This is
an easy one stop shop. It's not the
full picture, but this is from when I
was still censored on the other account. It's
from our after hours live. Verifiable facts. US
congress made sure the Aza battalion would get
arms in 2016. They still do. They just
pretend that they don't, but they're it's it's
still illegal to this day. CIA's trained them
since 2015, and now we know well back
to the forties.
FBI verified that the Azov movement is Neo
Nazi and is immersed with the Ukraine's government.
They lied about that to this day. And
that those in Charlottesville,
that's the important part, are their US faction.
So this is in a week Newsweek article,
but we've talked about this in many different
ways. The rise above movement
is the American arm
of the Azov movement.
So if you're following along in the evidence,
which I would I proved 15 times over,
is the Azad movement is funded by Israel,
is funded by the US government,
then that means that the Rise Above movement
that marched through Charlottesville, that way they will
not replace us, all that, which started the
whole thing,
was a US operation, was a Mossad operation.
That's what this is. They're and the same
with Germany. They've got the neo Nazi third
path. Italy's got Casa Pound. These are all
extensions of the same game.
In the Rise Above movement with the marching
through the streets and the hitting protesters with
the cars, that's where it all really kicked
off. And that was from the same group.
It's all very clear. We're being manipulated.
Now we're seeing more. The point is the
odd Waffen division, the base. These are all
different manipulations. The base, guys, if you remember
how embarrassing this is.
The base is literally the English translation of
Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda transfer it translates to
the base. So he this guy who was
a former state department guy is literally for
the government. I knew I was I I
was just bringing it up real quick. I
I wasn't gonna go into it.
It's right here. It'll pop up. The base.
Now they did change this by the way.
That's why I didn't wanna get into it
because I have to go back and get
the archive. Because I guarantee they're changing it
for obvious reasons. But even still, if you
just look it up and look at this,
it very clearly goes into
what's his name?
Hold on.
I'll find it real quick. It goes into
his background.
His name is
something with an n.
Yeah. Right here. The base.
Oh, right there. His name is Nazaro.
Made a little search for that, and I'll
show you what I'm talking about. Where he
used to work for the US government,
which is just ridiculous to me. Right right
there, I see the Ottomoffin division.
So it says that he
and where is it?
They changed all this too. I just looked
at it a second ago. It's in here.
Just gotta find it real quick.
So it's saying, come on. Damn it. I
said, I do this, then I have to
and now I have to find it because
I've waited this long.
Saying, where is it?
So frustrating.
Is it really a ball to the top
after I just looked at this?
That's I'm that's really frustrating.
I'm gonna find it now since I've made
you guys wait this whole time. So the
bottom line is he used to work for
the state department. He went oh, that that's
what that's what we'll find it. Hold on.
There it is. Afghanistan.
So it's saying he previously they said so
this would've changed it too. You could prove
all this stuff. It's very clear. He claimed
claimed to be a veteran of the wars
in Afghanistan. He is. He was there. The
government has actually spoken up about it. He's
since, denied putting on a uniform, which but
you could prove it's you prove it is.
That's what that's what's so funny. Nazaro later
claimed you've been an intelligence security military contractor
after posting, letters online from the Department of
Homeland Security and DHS and the Pentagon thanking
him for his service. In February 2021, DHS
confirmed his employment but would not authenticate the
letter. The point is, guys, this guy used
to work for the state department. He worked
for the Homeland Security. He worked overseas for
terrorism and counter operations, and then one day,
just went like, I'm gonna move to Russia
and start a terrorist group.
Certainly possible,
but it's embarrassing. Like, the point is you
can clearly see how this is meant to
work. And this was before the agenda, which
was meant to drive you into thinking that
Russia was seeding Nazism into Ukraine, which was
then overflowing into the United States, and they
were this is how it was all gonna
work. And it blew up in their face.
That's my opinion, but I think I've laid
this out very clearly. And then since then
and now I think what we saw continuing
was just the justification to get what they
wanted from Syria. But either way, they've been
trying to see these into other countries. You
can prove it. The rise above movement is
connected to this, is connected to the Azov
movement. They're the ones populating this stuff. That
should be easy to see by now. And
so now pointing back to Terragram, they're going,
here's a new one building up, and it's
connected and it's extended from the very same
group that they're still manipulating.
Here's an article from 2022. US government and
corporate media did desperately attempt to rewrite history
and hide the truth about Ukraine.
Look at this guy. Yeah. And that's that's
just that's he's just telling you right from
my heart. That's what he's saying.
Right from my heart, guys. Straight to the
neo nazis. Right from my heart.
And here's one, Al Qaeda, Ukraine, and the
new Al Qaeda. Whitney wrote this for KeyLab
in 2022,
highlighting oh, I mean, this and she gets
she talks about the Adam Waffen division. The
point is where we are from this the
new Al Qaeda. Right? We're they're extending these
agendas. And it's now it's it's shifted a
lot since then.
But in regard to the fake actions before
we get into the actual Zionism Nazi overlap,
Mentos men Mench Ocint shared this. And these
are it's it's just amazing how con continuously
this happens. Do not take this for the
the fact that there are no events. There's
people acting against Jewish people all over the
world. There are people acting as black people,
acting as white people. There's racism, guys. People
act out in disgusting ways all over the
world, a lot of which is usually funded
and driven through people like we're talking about
today. The the point is there are also
a lot, and more than anything I've ever
seen, of people, in this case, Zionists,
faking these things to get you to think
they're happening. Now, in what other context does
that happen? How often, if there's that much
of this, why would they need to fake
it all the time?
That's the point. It's pretty clear this is
a false agenda that's being driven. Not that
it doesn't exist, but that they're manufacturing this
like pretending there's a 400% spike in antisemitism
that you can prove is largely Palestinian support.
That's a lie. Right? Here he is. He
goes, well, well, well, victim of the antisemitic
tags in his building in Paris would have
invented everything. That's a translation. It's actually a
woman. The point is you can see the
video right here. This went viral
acting so serious on TV. Look at all
these painted swastikas
and crosses.
Look at all my God, it's all over
the She lied about this. She's been caught.
Now why would somebody do that? Because of
attention? Maybe you're lonely. Maybe you're being paid.
Well, don't work it. Don't forget. We just
talked about this in the context of the
Muslim attacks,
which is all all this ties together. You
realize this is this is one conversation.
But why and you can watch this. It's
a public story right now. It's it's pretty
the the craziness of how public it gets
and yet nobody really talks about it. Like
like the like the soccer game. Right? Like
the flag stabbing of the eye. Like, these
are, like,
in spectacular
fashion,
blowing up in their face. And yet, the
media that would I mean, remember the Jesse
Smollett coverage? Like the ama the ability they
have to go after a story well after
they know it's fake. Or, alternatively, a story
that they ignore even they know it's real.
Like, it's just incredible.
It's just dishonesty. Where do you think that
comes from? It's a combination of influence from
their government and foreign manipulation.
Here, Wyatt Reed says and this is the
same story. RT covered it. Her name is
Nancy.
Now she faces 30,000 in fines for and
possible prison time for making it all up.
But why it reads as crazy how this
keeps happening. It's almost like there's some kind
of powerful geopolitical force incentivizing
this behavior.
UK pro law pro Israel lawyer fake graffiti,
attacked a frame pro Palestinian group. What do
you know?
An alleged hate crime at a Jewish cafe
was the most brazen a community's ever seen.
It was all fake, police now say.
Jewish man arrested after spray painting swastikas on
his own home. It really is unprecedented. Look
into this for yourself. It's unreal how many
times it's happened and then been publicly covered
and still you're not allowed to even consider
it. He told police he was stabbed for
being Jewish, then his Apple Watch caught him
in a lie.
I mean, think about that, how disgusting that
is. Not only that you're lying about a
hate crime, but you're trying to get people
punished for a crime they never committed because
you're a racist.
That's wild.
And of course, even people knowing they're lying
would start to rationalize it about, they're just
so gross, I have to lie. No. That's
that's your that is you. You're a bad
person.
Max Blumenthal points out, Australian police are investigating
whether overseas actors this is what Matt Wyatt
Reed was in was pointing to.
Or individuals are paying local criminals to carry
out anti Semitic crimes in the country.
No.
Sorta like people being paid on Twitter to
do that same thing.
Total like, total you can't it's not like,
I mean, look at the old Elon Musk
infrastructure through all this after getting caught for
censoring h b h one b lurches into
the whole racist Muslim, you know,
terror gang and in Europe and whatever else.
All of which there's some level of importance
to. Not and and you didn't even say
it like us. All of those stories which
are important in their own right. And and
the point is he is clearly
using them
and lying about them in most cases, which
is even more disgusting since there is truth
to these stories and he's the one making
it less visible
by lying about stuff. That's the point they
make all the time about this. But it
goes on to say, prime minister Albany says
anti Semitic attacks are, quote, being perpetrated by
people who don't have a particular issue, aren't
motivated by an ideology, but are paid actors.
He add which, by the way, makes it
that much harder to actually
figure out. Because there's no motive. They're just
they're being paid and they're doing it. And
it says he added, it's unclear who or
where the payments are coming from. I think
we all know. Australia's shadow no. To be
clear, do not blindly assume. My point is
from an opinion standpoint, I think it's quite
obvious what's driving this. But we would never
say we know for sure until we can
prove that. We all are allowed to have
opinions.
It says, Australia's shadow home office minister wonders
if a foreign government is engaging in state
sponsored terror. Isn't that interesting?
Well, yes. That's exactly what it'd be, but
only called out if it was somebody
from a certain part of the world.
Would it be anti semitic to investigate a
certain settler colonial country, he asks, whose existence
is justified by global proliferation of anti Semitism?
Exactly.
He says, remember when thousands of bomb threats
to the US Jewish community centers in 2017
were blamed on Trump's rise and the perp
turned out to be a Jewish Israeli teenager
living in Israel?
Remember that? You probably don't wanna talk about
it today, but it's real.
He goes, this that Israeli teen, Michael Kadar,
also used robocalls to issue 590
plus bomb threats to schools in Australia.
Despite being a dual US citizen, Israel refused
the FBI's request to extradite him. I wonder
why.
You know why.
Here's an interesting point.
Smile to, Johanna is the one that I
saw this first term. He says, Tommy Robinson
posts a gotcha photo of fully veiled Muslim
woman. But first, before we get into it,
let's look. Look at this.
How horrifying. Right?
All the the scary images of the evil
Muslims of of Middle East. Right? He says
admin post. I'm not sure what that means.
I've seen him do that. Does that mean
he's not doing it? I don't care, frankly.
He says this has no place in the
21st century.
Women in Islam with choice is what this
person says.
Right? Clearly, they're just good people trying to
expose the dangerous Islam, right?
Well, guess what?
That's not what it
is.
He
says.
But
it backfires.
Turns out it's actually a Jewish woman in
Israel.
Who saw that coming? The man funded by
Zionists can't even tell the difference. Suddenly, the
crusader of freedom has nothing to say. Hypocrisy
level legend.
I responded to him down here, and I
said, will you still call this out? Here
it is, by the way. This is forward.
Jewish independent nonprofit. Here's what it says. Introducing
the Fromquah,
Jewish woman under the burqa.
It says
and this is in Israel, 2015.
This isn't it says, no. This isn't a
dementor or
modern art installation.
This isn't even, as you're more likely to
expect, a Muslim woman wearing a burka.
It was a sweltering hot day of 80
degree weather that photographer, Yavak Lederman,
saw this site in Beth Shemeshah
or, Shemsha. Shemsha. How do you say that?
Or she messaged. Excuse me.
A Jewish woman and her 2 daughters, a
dark black clothing covering them head to toe
in Israel.
Isn't that interesting?
So what's funny to me and almost just
disgusting about it is that I made this
point before about Jewish head coverings. You know
that there are women, orthodox women in in
Jew the Jewish religion that are required to
wear head coverings. Right? Probably not because that's
totally crazy and completely hypocritical in the way
they call it out. But it's only when
you're a different color skin. That's what matters.
Right? So totally racist. Exactly what Zionists actually
are in every effing context. It's crazy to
me how obvious this is. So what's funny
again is that you've got people like Tommy
Robinson that are scream that just like Elon
Musk, that are fanning the flames of this
radical hatred towards Muslims when, oh, you just
called out Judaism.
And I said, will you still call this
out as having no place in the 21st
century once you realize it's actually a picture
of a Jewish woman in Israel?
As forward covered below, which I promise you,
even though I'm showing it from a Jewish
platform that's claiming this is the fact that
you can easily look it up, just look
up the image. You'll find it all over
the place.
They'll still deny it. I bet you there
was still people will argue you're still wrong
or you're still miss there's no way because
that's you just won't let it be because
that's not what fits into the way you
view things.
So the question is the same.
Is this okay with you now that it's
Jewish versus Muslim?
If it is, you are the problem.
If that's okay with you, you are the
the point is it's not your choice.
People can live within to the religion that's
there. The bottom line is, it is a
weird thing to suddenly be okay with it
if it's not Muslim. That means you are
being radicalized
by
Zionism, I would argue, which is exactly what
Tommy Robinson is funded by.
Isn't that crazy?
This is an important thing to share, I
think, guys. And look, look what's funny to
me. You know this would this is a
gotcha moment.
That's not I've shared this 3 different times.
Look at the engagement on this. You think
Twitter's not suppressing that? I've got 80,000 followers
now. You think nobody sees that? Guys, it's
just not being shown up. I promise you.
Please, caption to share it. It's hilarious to
me how much this gets suppressed. You know
why, in my opinion? Because Elon Musk is
a part of this agenda.
Here's an example. Mehdi Hasan, who I'm not
a fan of, says check the date on
the store this shocking story.
And then ask yourself why Nigel Farage and
Elon Musk haven't been tweeting about these people.
You know why?
They know why. We all know why. That's
what he says. Well, these 6 white people,
Scottish child abuse gang members jailed for between
8 20 years.
Look at that.
January
2025
27.
That's 2 days ago.
You have an you have an entire Scottish
gang
arrested,
covered
by why they're covering it?
It's a fair point. Right? Well, I mean,
it's obvious, guys. If you can't recognize by
now that they're completely
they're they're choosing to focus in on what
they want you to think is the bigger
problem.
They want you to believe. And when when
the reality is, if you actually stand back
and look at it, it's not just the
individual entities. It is the governments involved in
all of this and not just part of
it. But, yes, the UK government, the US
government, yes, there's obvious line, not one side
or the other.
In fact, if you really wanna start drawing
lines to the Epstein list back to the
Musks and Trump's and Biden's and hunters of
the world, they're all involved. But let's they
don't wanna get into that game. But they
love to float the idea that they're somehow
gonna release that list even though I doubt
that will happen.
The obvious point here, guys, is yes. There's
an issue. There's a conversation to be had
about any gang of whatever religion or skin
color that are raping people, obviously. But to
try to make it about one type of
person or religion
makes you the problem.
Makes you the disgusting individual that is trying
to make it about one thing because of
your agenda for a foreign country, I might
add. That's my opinion.
We always used to be clear that broad
stroking was ignorance
until it got framed as intelligence.
And mice goes, mega, mega, mega.
Right.
Because make Europe great again is America first.
Remind me how that works.
But, of course, Peter Sweden says, reject socialism,
restore free speech, protect the poor.
But we don't care about this, the most
obvious example of all the things you're pointing
to. Right? You literally go down the checkbox
of everything he's talking about, and that is
Zionism.
At least in sim some cases, they're what
they're fainting. Right? Like the woke mindset, which
is all about the manipulation of all of
us.
But, guys, we need to see what's really
going on. How clearly they're trying to use
these conversations
to distract you while they literally build you
a prison around you.
Now as Matt Kennard pointed out, unfortunately well,
actually, in response to Elon Musk, which is,
by the way, the game he's playing.
Right? So he does a literal Nazi salute,
whether he meant it that way or not,
which is the same way we've argued the
entire time. I don't know his mind. He
could be stupid enough to think that made
sense and think he meant my my very
aggressive biting my lip and hitting my chest,
giving your heart, does that make sense?
Twice. I mean, I really don't even know.
I don't care at this point. It's ridiculous.
I don't think he's a Nazi. I think
that's a silly thing to argue, but he's
clearly a little bit extreme in a lot
of ways. But I still don't know whether
that meant this I think it'd be stupid
even if he was an actual Nazi to
think he would do that publicly. It seems
silly.
The point is, if you're not brain dead,
it's identical to an actual salute. I mean,
even Kate, many people put out that clip
where it's literally
along with their blood drive. It's identical.
So to to pretend a jumping jack is
not a jumping jack because you didn't mean
to do a jumping jack is dumb. It's
the same thing, right? So that's the point.
So he did a Nazi salute, whether he
meant it that way or not, and then
he said people called him out for being
a Nazi.
As alternately, they called him out for being
a Zionist. Right? Yeah. And he goes, apparently
I'm a Zionist and a Nazi.
Exactly, dummy. It's exactly the case. But what's
funny, and again, I don't think he's a
Nazi. What's funny is he's definitely a very,
very clearly, at least bought off in influencing
for his agenda.
But the point is obviously, yes. That's absolutely
more connected than he realizes, if not identical.
And he says, unfortunately, I don't mean in
the sense that they're exactly the same thing.
I wrong choice of words. They are synonymous,
I guess, in the same way that one
is working along with the other, that the
outcome of the extremist ideology seems to be
very similar. And he says, unfortunately, there is
no contradiction between Nazism and Zionism. Their goals
of emptying Europe of its Jewish population aligned.
It's the truth. They are also both racist,
supremacist, and colonial ideologies. True. The reality is
if you go back to the origin point
of Herzl, who was a dying or he
was an atheist,
wrote down his extremist opinions of Jewish people
all the way back then. Arguably,
some opinions are that they were the Christian
Zionist that were using the Jewish population. That's
his point. However you look at it, though,
the argument was to remove them.
Same thing. Same deal. And it says the
Havar agreement between the Nazis and Zionist organizations
signed in 1933 was concerned with transferring German
Jews to Mandatory Palestine.
So they worked with them, guys. It's on
the record. You can look it up on
Wikipedia for crying out loud. With 60,000
moving in for 6 years in 1939.
Let me grab
make sure I got that.
It was this one. It's that tweet I've
showed you before from Dan Cohen. I'll come
back to it.
So he goes on to say, rich, Reinhard
Hendrik, one of Hitler's most notorious lieutenants,
wrote in the SS paper in 1935,
quote, the Nazi government finds itself in complete
agreement with the great spiritual movement within Jewry
itself,
so called Zionism.
Think about that. Now if you it depends
on what you believe here. If you think
that Hitler was only going after Jews,
then why does that make sense? It would
make sense because it's not actually Judaism. It
is an ideology meant to destroy it for
its own purposes, then you could find the
easy to line up. But it says
1937, Adolf Eichmann, one of the key architects
of the destruction of European Jewry, met with
the Jewish Zionist
and Haganah agent we've talked about,
Fievel Poulkes in Berlin
to discuss the possibility that the zion the
Nazis
might even supply weapons for the Zionist fight
against the British mandate in Palestine,
and that Eichmann could arrange for Germany's Jews
to be deported there.
Later in the same year, Eichmann was smuggled
into Palestine by the Zionist disguised as a
journalist. He was eventually expelled by the British.
Ken Livingstone had had his reputation destroyed for
mentioning these facts.
Right? Here's Zachary Foster, has a PhD in
Palestinian history from Princeton.
He says, just wrote a piece on this
topic. Why antisemites love Israel? A brief history.
The point is guys these are facts
very easily verified.
And you still get attacked or point them
out what does that show you.
As Dan Cohen highlighted and this was the
point that came up when this guy early
on in the post October 7th was the
oldest living
IDF reservist who was part of the Lehigh
party.
And he said, these animals can no longer
live. Kill every one of them. WAN, women,
and child. That's what he was saying. Because
he's a an extreme like, the extremist, guys.
Like, they were the ones that were they
those videos you can see of them laughing
about how they raped young children and just
look, it's not a joke. These are the
Zionist Lehi maniacs that were the ones committing
the Nakba, and they laugh about it.
They still give a Lehigh pin today to
people that do whatever they gain I guess
whatever you think deserves that. But he goes
this person was a member of the Lehigh
Zionist terrorist group that twice attempted to ally
with Nazi Germany and sought to find a
found a copycat fascist state.
On January 11, 1941,
vice admiral Rolf and Der Warmitz, the the
German naval attache in Turkey, filed a report
conveying an offer by Lehigh to actively take
part in the war on Germany's side. In
return for Germany support to establishment of a
historic Jewish state on the national and totalitarian
basis bound by the treaty with German Reich.
So much evidence. It's incredible.
And down here, and this is the article
I'll show you next. This is from Perez
showing you they continued
to try to align with Nazi Germany even
after the final solution had begun.
Now that has to be an important point
because we're supposed to believe the entire foundational
point of why they exist was to fight
the fight things like the final solution.
They'll never again, except they were part of
it, guys. Not every Israeli or every Jew.
It's about the Zionist Israeli government. Well, these
every Israeli point doesn't make sense in that
context because we're talking about pre Israel. The
point is nonetheless. It's not about every element.
It's about what they were doing that bastardized
these ideas
for their benefit, just like they did today,
including the Hannibal Directive. Same dynamic. But here's
the article from Moretz. Oh, before that, actually.
This is me just putting you know, highlighting
this. Here is a voice of rabbis.
It's another it's another account, 294,000
followers, Jews united against Zionism.
These groups are rapidly growing. I keep talking
about this and I keep getting pushback, even
people that
I feel like I've got a pretty I
mean, I don't blindly I I question it.
I wonder what but let just like with
COVID, I feel like you start to pick
up on these signals about when you can
see these things. And right now, I think
it's long since past the point of which
most people,
Jews included,
are seeing
this. Israel was founded under the sponsorship of
Adolf Hitler, they wrote. The Zionist organization was
Hitler's ally.
Zionists are people who trample on Jewish honor,
Jewish conscience, and Jewish morality.
Super contentious.
They're rabbis.
They're orthodox Jews against Zionism. It's why they
were hated by Zionism.
It says since this will get major pushback
from Zionists running from their own history, be
sure to watch our show discussing the 2
and their overt connection. That's this article from
Zionism versus Nazism.
And then I highlight this, which I'll show
you in the article.
As Horace reported in 2023,
Zionism continued to seek an ally with Nazi
Germany even after the final solution began.
If you do not know this,
ask yourself how that's possible.
Transcripts. We'll go there in a second.
This is the headline. Zionist military orgs efforts
to recruit Nazis in fight against the British
are revealed. The Haganah interrogated members of the
Lehi in 1942
and the recently released transcript shed light on
the dark chapter in the right wing malicious
history. Now as always, you can argue there
are parts just like in the main point
when you actually go past the Nakba.
The history shows that a Jewish the Jewish
people that lived in the area were not
okay with what Zionism were Zionist were doing
to the Palestinians.
That's I I I can't speak for everything.
I'm sure there are people that did support
it. The point is the way you get
reported, both through the UN and other local
things that you can still find, they were
outraged. That's this doesn't represent what we believe.
That's the point, guys. And just they just
forced it through and had political support. And
to this very day, those Jewish people did
not ring their their voices didn't carry. The
Zionists pretending to be the Jewish people, they
did. And that has influenced even Jewish people
today.
The reality, though, is to say that this
was a huge part of Zionism.
Not every single element necessarily, even on that
side of it. Right? But, nonetheless, this is
what is rung with this is what won
out.
As it says,
transcripts of Zettler's interrogation.
This is one of the leaders of the
Lehi party, which were released to the public
last month. And this is what's interesting is
their state archives, most of which they rarely
let out because they know what it looks
like, include information on the dark chapter, its
ties with Nazi Germany. This is harratz, guys.
We will communicate with any military power ready
to help
with the establishment of the kingdom of Israel,
even if it's Germany.
Zettler told these astonished interrogators,
the only condition is that we get weapons
so we can rebel against the English.
Right? The English that later ended up giving
them to the Balfour Declaration, the very area
probably to fight. So the point is, guys,
it's always about
something other than what they pretend they care
about. These governments or power structures rarely care
about you.
And they allowed
one of the most U. S. Cream extremist
racist elements in the world
to grow in power for their benefit.
At the expense of the people they claim
they were fighting for that's everywhere you look
right now.
All of its there if you just care
look.
Max Blumenthal points this out. Same thing, Elon
going, apparently, I'm a Zionist adenazi.
He says this coin was minted by Joseph
Goebbels in honor of the friendly visit of
the top SS Jewish affairs officer, Leopold von
mild,
Moldenstein,
to Zionist kibbutzim in Palestine
1933.
The Zionist movement in Nazi Germany soon collaborate
on the notorious transfer agreement.
You can look this up for yourself.
It's kinda hard to miss.
So it's important to highlight how I think
this is already playing a factor in today.
Right now, not just the faking of elements
we're gonna see or the Nazi marches or
the extremist elements or the false flags that
I believe are in the works.
We also have the reality of this, which
I think is, you know, look, you can
read this however you want. This is my
opinion.
So I don't know for sure exactly the
ins and outs of every part of what
this was or ultimately whether this was the
reason it happened. But I think this makes
a lot of sense. And this now that
I'm seeing this really start to come to
fruition, these things start to stand out more.
Now as Greg Stoker points out, for this
is a
government a con a correctional,
it's going through Congress
about illegalizing
Antifa.
It says they will never tell you fascism
has arrived.
Instead, they will make antifascism
illegal.
White supremacist
goon squads like Patriot Front will never be
targeted.
Instead, they'll be used to do the dirty
work the state doesn't want to be done
be seen doing.
So here's what's interesting.
Antifa, I think we all know by now,
was not I mean, it seems pretty clear
it was not even an organic entity. This
was this was, like, another Patriot Front element.
And that more so than any of them,
I think, has been pretty clearly proven. Sort
of like different other militia groups that seem
to be led by some FBI informant. There's
that's the kind of thing we're seeing. And
this came out very clearly. So my point
is
through using a group that makes like, let's
be oh, yeah. I'll just read what I
said first because it's funny. Not funny, but
just it's you know? I said, now the
long term Antifa Fed manipulation comes into focus.
A group literally acting fascistic
while feigning resistance to fascism.
That's the important part. Seemingly designed to draw
obvious pushback that's then used to justify government
classification
of resistance to fascism as illegal, but without
saying that. You see what I'm saying? So
Antifa,
antifascist,
is not they're not antifascist.
What they do is fascism.
So what's funny, or at the very least,
authoritarian
or calling for the point is they then
act out in ridiculous ways, so we then
go bad group, and then they go, okay,
group bad. And then through that, make it
illegal to essentially, like so then you stand
up and go, what you're doing is actual
fascism. Oh, boy. That's Antifa. You can't do
that.
You can decide for yourself. I think it's
kind of an easy one, Stu. This is
a problem and action solution dynamic.
We're at a point where they have, through
a series of well crafted manipulations,
driven us right where they want us. It
seems to make sense to me.
And people commenting on this say it's really
so easy.
We don't need new ridiculous laws. I say
this all the time. I agree. We need
to enforce the ones we already have that
make sense. If a guy wearing a bandana
throws a brick at a window, that's already
a crime, Marjorie Taylor Greene, the one introducing
this.
We don't need a new law. So think
about that. You got a republican introducing a
law to ban
a certain way of thinking,
to ban
antifascism.
Right? Deeming certain conduct of members of Antifa
as domestic terrorism. So, again, now, yes, you're
gonna argue, well, they broke the law, but
that's his point. There are there are already
laws. So it's redundant or it's not. It's
not about the law. It's about using the
guise of stopping when they do law, right,
when they do illegal things, but in this
fashion.
And then that broadens out to just anybody
do you see where this goes? And, look,
at the very least, whatever you think about
it, this is a Republican
deeming a certain style of thought action views
as terrorism.
As if you read through it, guys, this
is as always, it's broad. It will end
up applying to other things than just throwing
bricks through windows or wearing masks. And, you
know, you this is how it always works.
But, of course, because they've they've framed it
as we all anybody with a brain, I
would argue, thinks Antifa is ridiculous.
I think it's obvious what they do is
not as counterproductive,
but just like a lot of the similar
types of things on the right. Like, a
lot of these different groups. Like, within I
wouldn't compare them to, like, a Patriot front.
I think they're a little bit they're not
really equivalent. It's a different kind of game.
But whatever you wanna point at, there's all
sorts of little faux groups in the right
doing similar things in the same way.
And that is easy to go everyone should
go, well, those are ridiculous. But that's just
how it works.
This person says,
has no one else seen those 2 hour
long Antifa Zoom meetings? And I said, thank
you, pointed out revolution for sharing that. And
we've talked about this once, I think, in
the past. Here it is from National File.
Leaked Zoom call. DC and Tifa have planned
violence for election night
2020.
Well, we've talked about this too.
Right? Here is some of those people.
Here are some of those people. This was
the title show January 6th was always a
very clear government operation. An important Tennessee bill
or the oh, that's that's second part. Always
clear government operation.
Now obviously, we're
still this is 2023. We're pointing back at
it. The point is you can clearly prove
this where this guy was a member of
the Azov movement who was there spoof screening
things in Russian.
That's quite obvious. This guy was a member
of some kind of left leaning group that
was there going, we did it. We tricked
him. We got him on video. Epps going
I mean, guys, everything about this is so
transparent, but you don't really see any real
outcome. I how much you wanna bet, we
don't see much more even coming through Trump's
administration.
Whether Pelosi or otherwise.
Despite how very obvious it is because it's
not about them. It's about you.
All of them against you.
Now Elon Musk
points to rabbit hole again, which again, let's
see what they've got now. Almost a 1000000
followers now.
The national debt and how much each person
in America would have to contribute to pay
it off. Look at that.
My god.
$36,000,000,000,000.
106,000
for every American.
Elon Musk goes, it's critical to take action
on this now.
Yeah. You said the thing. Yes. That's the
right thing to say.
Well, what's gonna happen? Well, here's $500,000,000,000
for AI infrastructure. Right? Here's new hiring. Look,
as I just simply looked up really quickly
on this,
department of government efficiency established.
Okay.
What has it done since its establishment?
Well, this is an overview. Right? But it
is pretty well encompassing. It says establishment of
Doge teams. Okay? Each federal agency was instructed
to establish a team with 4 different people.
Okay. So more hiring. Okay.
Software modernization,
The US Digital Service, which is otherwise now
called Doge, by the way. That's important not
to forget. They simply renamed the digital services,
which are working towards digital IDs and other
that's just Doge now. So you've been played.
Has commenced a software modernization initiative aimed at
improving the quality of efficiency with government software,
IT system. Oh, okay. So digital upgrades.
So more work.
Efficiency, maybe. We'll see how it plays out.
Promotion of AI and other tools. Doge is
expecting to promote the use of artificial intelligence.
Okay. So, again, maybe that will reduce some
jobs, I guess, but that's not you know,
it's either way. It's about adding and growing
artificial intelligence infrastructure that's spending. Focus on defense
spending spending. Doge is anticipated to scrutinize the
Department of Defense, a key target. Okay.
Expected to. Okay. We'll see what happens. We've
seen a lot. Now look. I'm arguing simply
that a lot of this is about we're
going to, it's happening, we're signing this document.
We haven't actually seen a lot of outcome.
Doesn't mean it won't happen.
I I almost guarantee that it will happen
because, otherwise, how do they keep tricking you
into your technocratic prison? But it's interesting because
it's still kind of like, we did it
already. It's over. Like, we did like last
time before it even happened.
Contractor workforce
review. There's been a recognition that the Department
of Government Efficiency might be overlooking other sources
of savings.
Conflict of interest concerns. There's concerns about you
know, this is just other thoughts on it.
No. Either way,
I'm of the mind that right now, we
haven't seen this. But don't worry, though. Doge
News shared a screenshot
that shows a thing that says 33,000,000,000,
so therefore, we did it.
Doge just saved us $34,000,000,000.
Cool. There's no source material. There's no I
guess we'll just take your word for it.
I mean, I don't think that's the case.
And I'm sure there's some level of maneuvering
here, but if you're gonna I mean, guys,
if you're going to sign off on even
the 100,000,000,000 that's going to be going out
right away for the infrastructure,
then that's already a wash. So just don't
pretend like we're just because you're cutting off
something and spending more, you're still not saving.
You're still spending over the amount that you
cut. So it's they love to pretend
they're doing one thing while they're not doing
something. It's obvious the way this is being
played.
Overall,
it's about trying to get you small wins
to make you think you're changing everything. Well,
what they do is roll out exactly what
they're using to keep you in place.
The AI control structure, digital IDs, social credit,
all the technocracy that we know is coming.
Now I think I'm gonna pause right there,
guys,
and go and try to come back at
this tomorrow. I'm hoping I'll have enough time
tomorrow.
What I'm gonna get into, I'll just show
you really quickly.
That is it's about the spending overlap. This
one is
the money of the freezing of the federal
money, which is interesting only because it went
it went out and everyone defended it and
the cow said you're wrong and it's right.
And then he pulled it right back.
So now he's rescinded the memo. So all
the people that were screaming that it was
right, you know it's right. Well, now he
just basically rescinded it. So argue I I
think it's pretty clear that the free it
went awry.
It became clear that Republicans were also gonna
be hurt by this, and that was already
becoming a clear thing that was being ignored
by the team for Republicans. And so that's
what I think was happening.
Overall, it's about
this broad sweeping thing that I and, oh,
the other thing was too that it was,
I think, against law.
Like, the game where you can just sweepingly
pull back on everything even though the even,
like, I'll I'll be the first to argue
that through congress or not, there's a lot
of abuse and just profiteering and criminal criminal
activity.
But, nonetheless,
my point is the same as if you're
gonna come in and just do the same
thing back to the way you like it,
well, all you're gonna do is perpetuate the
problem. If we actually want things to change,
then you gotta go through doing them the
right way.
Right? Arguably, it's against it's unconstitutional for him
to just change funding that was been approved
by Congress.
But when's the last time they even cared
about Congress or war or anything else? It's
all an illusion in my opinion. But either
way, it it got pushed back. We'll see.
I'm gonna go into every one of them.
I'm gonna try to wrap this up right
now. Or the condom discussion,
which just so you know, guys, it's embarrassingly
stupid. They're wrong. I don't think this new
KJP even knows that.
And she's KJP for a completely different reason.
Because I don't think these people are not
even remotely the right person for these positions.
They're the right person because they're a completely
a a automaton
that will do what they're told. But my
point is
the condom discussion
appears to be completely false. From and I
I look through this in-depth and for the
whether it's because they won't even allow those
to be sent. And when this was supposed
to be agreed upon, it was well before
the ceasefire. They're lying, guys. But that's what
they do.
Or the idea about the podcasters, bloggers, and
social media influencers
being in the press room now. Social media
influencers.
How is that even remotely the same thing
as a journalist, by the way? And why
would they be involved? So you're gonna get
these, you know,
I can't even wait to see how super
this ends up being if that's the reality.
And you're gonna have a bunch of ridiculous
TikTok influencers standing in there asking what they
think is most likely going to be whatever
this platform tells them to say, which is
the rapid response 47.
Oh, so a White House fact checker.
I thought we were done with fact checkers.
Oh, but oh, the right kind of fact
checkers. The our fact check oh, okay. Got
it. So, hypocrites. Understood.
We're gonna talk about
there it is. The myth them ethics pledges.
And I am gonna get into this more
because it's important, I think, to see how
this overlaps
with him canceling ethics for Biden's side of
things,
which,
again, it's Biden, so it's bad.
Well, that's not automatically the case. If he's
removing things that ultimately
concern even Republicans,
maybe we should ask what these are. And
then ask if he hasn't signed any ethics
pledges and wonder what that means in regard
to foreign funding and how that works with
his cryptocurrency
overlap.
Right? The me really, as it even says
right here, even his own supporters are starting
to ask whether people can simply, including foreign
governments, funnel money to the government or to
the Trump family.
How is that not exactly what this can
be used for? Whether Trump or Melania coin,
it's unaccountable.
No ethics pledges, so we don't even know.
We'll talk about this tomorrow. RFK Junior,
his stake in a gene editing platform,
small amount, by the way, but still worthy
of consideration, and I find it to be
hypocritical.
The drone conversation.
No. I mean, honestly, some of these are
small. Like,
it's just crazy to me. All these are
so dishonest.
Everyone like Jack Posobiec out there trying to
just flatly misinform
you, saying that, oh my god. They just
said this is where he's right here.
Trump just told us it's to confirm that
Biden did this to no. That's not what
they just said. You guys are so blatantly
dishonest.
Bottom line is they all knew, guys. And
the real point should be, look at all
the people like Alex Jones that were screaming
some other narrative every 30 seconds. Now it
turns out even Trump knew that it was
just the their drones. Or what she actually
said was FFA,
ran
random drone flyers that are random citizens
and other things, which, by the way, was
what Biden's White House already told us.
So we already got told that. And now
they're reiterating that. And people like this guy
go, oh my god. They're
I mean, they just know what they're doing.
They're trying to get you worked up about
one side because they know you'll fall for
it if you're a partisan player. Don't be
that gullible.
The drone dynamic was obvious as people like
this were talking about. It was about the
end game,
rationalizing this. Whether it's because of the Palantir
advertisement they played at the same exact time,
December 2024, about drones at the navy army
game or the idea of Palantir working with
Israel, overlapping on these things is about driving
in the technocratic outcome.
As True Street Media says, so they knew
the drones were what they were the whole
time. And they just wanted everybody, including members
of the local state governments, wasting time meeting
with no answers. To spend weeks freaking out
about nothing? Yes.
So if Trump knew about that, why didn't
they say anything? Why now are they still
giving you cryptic answers? Because it's all the
same thing. It's your government manipulating you for
the one outcome
or the lie about the military entering California
to turn the water on.
But if you don't realize that they know
you'll end up knowing they're lying, so there's
obviously a game being played here. Now there
was maintenance. It was down for 3 days,
turn it back on. No military involved. They're
lying to you. And Trump knew you would
find that out, so why did he lie
about it?
We'll go we'll go over more of this
coming up soon.
We'll leave it there for today.
But thank you for tuning in, guys.
Appreciate your patience.
There's, you know, obviously a lot going on
in general. But right now, it's important that
I'm with my family and that will take
precedent for me for as long as it
takes. But just know that I'm still gonna
be here. I'm still gonna be working. And
it you know, knowing my I mean, even
today, like, I I honestly wasn't sure I'd
be able to take the time. I just
it's I go I'm I will lose my
mind
if I don't take time to get this
stuff out. And and the the other thing
I actually thought about this
was I know that's what she wants. I
know I know that she cares about this.
You know? I mean, I even today, I
mean, I I
on a personal note, you know, I was
going every time I go to do the
show before I get started, I send I
send a link out to certain people that
didn't want it. You know? That direct text
messages because it's easier to see. And she
was one of those people.
And I have a little moment in the
starting of this where I was going through
sending it out and I I saw it.
It's gonna re re send it to her
like I always do, you know?
And I just simply sent it to her
anyway. And I said, this one's for you.
So she's out there watching, you know? And
that's
why we do this.
We're doing this because of what we believe
in, because we care about people out there
that, you know, that want good things in
the world. That genuinely want to see the
outcomes that we all know we're fighting for
not for some guys not for some half
measure.
But just truly fighting for we believe in.
You know, I mean, it's it's talk about
cost, guys. There's so many people today doing
this work. As I've said before, that are
that are gonna suffer the consequences of this
forever.
But it's still worth it because what we're
doing is important.
What you're doing right now is important.
We're making a difference with every single moment
we do this work. Every single moment we're
making a difference and we're impacting someone's life.
I just can't you cannot put a measure
on that.
So I'm gonna continue to do this as
every opportunity.
We need your support.
We can't do it without you. You are
the last American vagabond.
Thank you for being here. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.