This starts and it's it's really fascinating to
go back. It starts, in
1996
with Netanyahu,
who wrote a book called Fighting,
Terrorism.
And the thesis of the book is, quite
straightforward and
and and,
very dangerous.
He says, you know, there are there's Hamas,
there's Hezbollah. They oppose Israel. It's not good
for us to fight them directly.
That that won't work.
What we need to do is topple the
governments
that that back them. So what we need
is regime change throughout the Middle East.
And he actually gave a long list of
7 countries,
that included,
Syria,
Libya,
Iraq,
Iran,
Somalia,
Sudan, and Lebanon.
And systematically,
the United States has done Netanyahu's bidding for
almost 30 years now, going to war with
every one of them except for the big
one, that Netanyahu
so much longs for, which is the war
directly
between the United States and Iran.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Sunday, January 26, 2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
So much to get to today.
Not because I mean, every day there's this
many things we could possibly talk about, but
I just
some reason decided I'm gonna get it all
on the show today that I wanted to.
And so for that very reason, really no
preamble to start. We're gonna talk about the
ceasefire. We're gonna talk about the updates therein,
how much has been going on. And the
first major part today we're gonna talk about
is gonna be about a lot of different
overlapping points
that that are kind of in the in
the vein of what we've been talking about
in a lot of different context with the
IMA, you know, tech the the kind of
Zionist technocratic drive, the overtaking of this, the
the misinformation,
the false narratives, the the partisan games. So
I'm gonna leave it there. There's a lot
to get to today. And I bet you
we're gonna touch on just about everything people
wanna talk about, say for
a few different peripheral issues. But we'll leave
it there to start. Hopefully, you'll stay tuned
today because telling you, it's gonna be a
fantastic show. There's really just a lot to
get to. And not least of which is
the overlapping point about the Warp Speed 2
point o reality that is not just about
vaccines, guys, or injections. It's about the combination
of all this and how it all comes
together. Have a great clip from you from
Catherine Austin Fitts we're gonna get to. To
start, though, to just get right into it,
guys. Lot to talk about. I wanted to
highlight a couple things that we're gonna be
getting at in the after the first part,
but I did not want you to miss,
that I wanted to make sure that you
saw because we're gonna be talking about a
couple important things. One of them is
hold on. Make sure I didn't just, oh,
that's interesting. Hi. It took all this time
to make sure I have this ready, and
then I have the wrong screen share. That's
that's part 2. Let me get let me
get the right one, and we'll get started
here.
Funny.
Okay. There we go. So as well, that
way, you're gonna see in a minute. Later,
we're gonna get into the foreign policy part
of it for the most part starting right
there. But I wanted to start with 2
things that connect with that part of the
show that I really just did not want
you to miss. So first off, if you
haven't seen this already, this is gonna be
one of the primary things we're discussing. And
it's, you know, sadly and it's not that
I take any pleasure from any of these
moments because every single one of these, I'm
every night I pray that I'm wrong about
where I see this going. I'm just the
point was,
just far too many I told you so
moments happening right now. And the other reason
that's relevant to point out is not because
we were right, but because it's important to
see that there are a lot of people
out there, ourselves included, that have been trying
to warn about where these things are going.
Not because we have any interest in the
outcome or because we're gonna benefit from one
side or the other, or one agenda or
the other, because we're trying to stop people
from suffering.
It's quite simple. And there's a lot of
good people out there doing this. And I
think it's important to highlight that this was
one of those big moments.
As the Associated Press is saying, Trump is
now openly telling the world,
Egypt, Jordan,
moving all the Palestinians.
Saying he's pressing Jordan, Egypt to take in
Palestinians from Gaza. Floats the plan to, quote,
just clean it out. I mean, it's just
it's it's it begins to more and more
seem like he maybe just has no idea
what he's talking about in this conversation. Because
if he's framing it like this, with what's
been going on, I mean, it's just very
tone deaf to the obvious reality of the
ethnic cleansing that's been going on the entire
time. Now we're gonna get into all that.
As I said, just as been expected.
The literal definition of ethnic cleansing. Isn't this
what Israel swore? And this is the important
part. Even if you wanna pretend now, which
most of them are, that this is the
right thing, or the the right way out
of this, or the correct move, Fine. You're
wrong, flatly. But
even if that's what you think, you need
to reconcile these two things. Israel was telling
us, screaming, that that was not gonna happen.
Now to to the west, openly laughing and
having
conferences about in Israel that your media and
your government lied about. But the point is,
they swore in the beginning this was never
the plan. Except at the beginning, we could
prove that it was because they were talking
about it and they had outlines. That's how
silly this has always been. But, also, that
the US government said you were racist for
even suggesting such a thing,
even though all the evidence showed this.
So if you still wanna argue that this
is somehow not ethnic cleansing and genocide, even
though it meets the exact definition and the
world is aware that it is, How do
you reconcile those two things? Right? This is
the problem with all this going on right
now. There's too many dishonest players in all
this that don't care about the contradictions because
they're not in it to be right or
wrong. They're in it to achieve in a
certain outcome for their benefit, usually at the
expense of everybody.
That's what we're staring at right now. So
I just wanna make sure we come back
to this. K? Because this is a very
important story, and I don't want you to
I don't want you to miss it if
you end up miss you know, only seeing
the first half of the show today.
On top of that, the one of the
main things we're gonna discuss in the foreign
policy aspect is is this how long have
we been talk ringing this bell?
Muhammad Shahana says there's a court there's a
concerted campaign,
and my point is there has been since
the very beginning, he says to blow up
the ceasefire by weaponizing the Biba's family plight.
Now realize, this is not something I was
guessing at. I was already making this claim
whether it was they were gonna use them
to disrupt the ceasefire or argue somehow that
Hamas never fulfilled their end of whatever ended
up being the case. I've said this many
times. So I just want 1, it's important
to demonstrate the value of the kind of
work we're doing to be this far ahead
of something like this, but also to see
how dishonest and disgusting the story is. So
if you don't know so far, this is
the main point and we'll come back to
it. The beaver's father, as we show right
here,
was released, yes, while he's in captivity.
A video saying that he saw his family
killed by the IDF.
Now, of course, he could be forced to
say that. I've never said otherwise. The point
is that with all the evidence we have,
the only thing that we can conclude with
everyone that's already come home and still maintained
what they were quote unquote forced to say
on camera. So how does that make sense?
The point is they were telling the truth.
They weren't being forced. Every other one of
them so far has maintained what they said
on these videos. So
and also, as co Dan Cohen has covered,
even the corporate media was forced to acknowledge
that these air strikes by the IDF are
what killed them. When Yasmin Porat said that
they did this in Israel, for crying out
loud, on October 7th. That's the Hannibal directive.
We know I mean, I'll go into it
more. The point is, guys, that they are
the father reported that they were killed. Now
the story is that every one of them
know that. All these Zionists, all the Israeli
government, it's been I have been personally putting
it in front of all of them, but
the point is it was a public story.
They know it. They even tried to deny
in the beginning. They said they're just making
this up. Well, that's not the reality that
we can see so far. So at the
moment, the all the evidence other than
resisting a
a narrative that only engages with what they
want to be the case, ignoring all the
facts at hand. That's the right way to
frame this.
Everything else suggests that this person
watched his family die. And now to this
point, and all this time, there's been this
weird concerted effort about using their faces, talking
about them constantly, and I kept saying, well,
look. You guys have been told they were
killed.
Here we are. And now, it's being claimed
that they aren't being returned, and that's violating
the deal. Even though, thus far, Hamas has
already publicly said, well after this, recently, over
the last week, that they were killed by
IDF Bonds.
So it's certainly possible, like anything is possible,
that they could somehow materialize later, which I
pray to God is the case.
So far, the evidence suggests otherwise, and everything
seems to be lining up with the reality
that they're using them and have always planned
to use them despite killing them themselves, I
argue deliberately,
to blow all this up and blame it
on them, which has been say what they've
been doing to Palestinians for 76 years.
So we'll come back to this. I just
think it's important to highlight that out of
the gate so you don't miss it. Now
on another note
that overlaps with all of this censorship, but
also with the Israel topic, Israeli topic, if
you haven't seen this already, this is super
important,
Ali Abunemah from the cofounder of the Electronic
Intifada, one of the most important websites around
I mean, for decades documenting
this very topic, has now been arrested.
And this is what's so infuriating about this.
It's somebody who's being arrested under the guise
of what terrorism
because of this information he's providing about the
Israeli
genocide. Meanwhile,
Netanyahu and other war criminals are being paraded
around by the very government screaming that they
care about human rights international law.
We, again, do not live in the world
we think we do. It's as simple as
that. Doesn't mean we can't. Doesn't mean that
there aren't aspects of it or people that
are good. But we have to understand the
system we're in, from the United States to
Europe to different western nations, is compromised.
Now you could argue, well, let's just put
it this way. It is not
the
society that we pretend it is if this
is the kind of thing that continues to
happen, if all it takes is one foreign
entity that pushes this into reality and this
is the kind of thing that ends up.
Palestinian American journalist and executive director of the
Elektronik Intifada was arrested by Swiss I thought
he was the cofounder. Correct me if I'm
wrong, but
it's listing him here as the executive director,
possibly both, was arrested by Swiss police
ahead of a scheduled speaking event in Zurich.
This incident follows an earlier interrogation upon his
arrival at Zurich airport, where he was questioned
for an hour. Abu Nama's arrest has drawn
attention to the increasing crackdown by Western governments
on journalists and activists who advocate for the
Palestinian cause.
Not anything against Jewish people, not anything for
terrorism, but for the you
the self determination of a people. Exactly the
same people that the Israeli government and the
US government pretend they're actually fighting to save
from Hamas. So how does that make sense?
Because they secretly pretend he's not doing that,
but the reality is he's helping the Palestinians
which they're all actually fighting. That's as simple
as that. It's a very simple topic actually.
It's not as complicated as they always love
to pretend it is. It's complicated when you
listen to Zionist narratives that are built on
lies and are easy to see through. And
it becomes complicated when you get uncomfortable for
how obvious it is, oh, but I'm gonna
be racist till I point it out, so
I'm just gonna shut up. That's 76 years
of suppression right there.
Abu Anamal has been granted access to legal
counsel, though the details surrounding the charges, if
any, remain unclear as posted on
26th. Maybe more may have developed in the
last so many hours. The point though
think about this.
So he's traveling overseas, he gets arrested,
right, for
what?
Arguably hate speech. Right? Isn't this exactly what
Elon Musk has been screaming about?
Funny how this person doesn't get the same
attention, even though it's the exact same topic.
People that are saying things online or saying
things in public that ultimately get suppressed because
of their hate speech laws or because of
their censorship re well, yeah. Elon, where are
you? I thought you were all about this
topic.
I guess it's only in regard to people
who are not.
People who are
whatever the agenda is that helps the Israeli
narrative. Because at this point, guys, if you
can't recognize the the same exact story here
right? So whether you have somebody over here
who's being censored for saying something against the
woke agenda,
which is ridiculous, they have a right to
say what they want, versus somebody saying things
against the Israeli agenda. Right? It's still information,
it's still free speech. Obviously, you get the
point. Certain people out there love to put
themselves out as the heroes of a topic
when in reality they're fighting for something very
different. People like this have a long, long
term track record of fighting for people
that are being oppressed. And that's why I
mean, you could understand why there's a certain
entity out there that does not want this
to be talked about.
Now this is the entire article from Electronikatifada.
You can read it for yourself from yesterday.
Craig Mokey McHyber points out, in the same
week that it facilitated the travel of a
perpetrator of genocide,
Erzog, who is the president of Israel,
and gave him a VIP platform to spout
his racist propaganda at Davos in Switzerland,
has now arrested and silenced a prominent human
rights defender and journalist for speaking out against
the same genocide. That's a boomerang.
Think about how ridiculous that is. And, look,
you could argue that they see him as
a criminal, but if you're going to argue
that based on everything in the world, be
it the ICC, the ICJ, every human rights
group in the world, the United Nations
roundly telling you this guy's a criminal, HRSAG,
Net Yahoo, all of them, that need to
be arrested per the international law they'd love
to point at, and instead, you give him
his platform and then arrest somebody who is
doing journalism.
Even if you disagree with the content. My
point would be, if you're gonna arrest a
journalist and claim he's a terrorist,
based on the idea that you disagree with
the content fro that's being framed by the
very group that's committing genocide, there's only one
way to look at this.
They are ignoring the international reality around these
criminals and going after the people that are
calling them out for it. We do not
live in the society we think we do.
The Swiss government is leaving little doubt as
to where it stands on this historic moment
of genocide. May history never forget.
As well,
John mac McEvoy points out, it turns out
that Mario Fair, or Fore, however you say
his last name, the secretary security chief in
Zurich, where journalist Abun Amah has been arrested,
has spoken at pro Israel rallies and called
for pro Palestinian demos to be banned.
Seems like there's a correlation here, wouldn't you
say? And he goes on to highlight the
obvious around this. This person,
the Zurich or the,
security chief in Zurich,
is this guy right here.
As Loki points out, this picture has emerged
as of Mario himself, justice director behind the
arrest of Agunemah and Zurich speaking at a
solidarity
event with Israel.
Which doesn't have to be inherently evil, right?
But you have to understand where we are
in the world right now. So, if only
one of these things happened, you could argue
maybe he just doesn't see what's going on.
Or maybe we're wrong about it somehow. All
those are possible, but then if you take
both stories at the same time, there's only
one way to look at this. This person
is actively speaking on behalf of a government
that's committing genocide according to the world, and
goes after the people who are exposing that.
It's quite simple.
As Sal Rod points out, like I said
earlier, war criminal Netanyahu can travel to Europe
and the US without consequence, despite the ICC
warrants for his arrest, which they all pretend
to care about in every other context, while
journalists like Abu Boonamag get arrested for speaking
out against the genocide they're committing.
What's more emblematic of western rot and hypocrisy
than that?
It's well put.
So starting on some of the things I
wanna highlight, some some potential positives.
So this is being reported that Donald Trump
is announcing a task force to fast track
at aid
overriding FEMA. There's a whole big conversation there
about what happens with FEMA and whether it's
gonna all these things are up in the
air, it seems, right now.
But and and basically helping people in North
Carolina, which, again, seems a little reactive based
on the points we were hearing before, but
good nonetheless. Right? The idea that it's happening
and people get support, but is it happening?
Same thing I wanna point out from before.
There's an important way to handle all this
stuff right now is to wait for outcomes.
Words are meaningless in political circles, guys, or
politics in general. They could be lying, they
could be wrong, something could change tomorrow.
We all know this except only when partisans
wanna cheer for the point is, if we
don't see it happening yet, go good, good,
good direction, we're waiting for it to happen.
So until people in North Carolina get aid,
this isn't
anything yet. Whether he wants it to happen
or not. It's not a see, what's what
I'm noticing about a lot of this, people
are really trying to make this about people
going against Trump.
So but those of us that are nonpartisan,
it's the power structure. We did this with
Biden and Obama and Bush and all the
rest of them because we just challenged the
power structure as we're supposed to. So my
point is when we make these comments, it
goes, oh, you're just going after well, no.
It's about the outcome for whoever's doing it.
The US government
is saying things. I'm waiting for them to
be accomplished, whoever the person is there. But
I'm getting a sense a lot of this
this conversation becomes about,
I guess, framing it as only because you
hate Trump, which, in a way, is the
very Trump delusion, derangement syndrome that we're always
pointing at. Both ways, that works.
Right? So the point point thing here is
we're gonna see a lot of this is
these signing things for task forces. Now, that
very well may be a positive thing. In
the very point of other than I, I
think, continuing to build more government, even if
it's limited, like, temporary, rather, task force or
not, Still more government, though. Nonetheless, the point
is maybe it develops into something that could
be a long term positive thing. Maybe the
task force continues to supersede FEMA and get
help right where it's needed. I will praise
that forever and when it happens. My point
is that we're seeing a lot of these
task force dynamics that are putting it out
to a discussion.
As always, even if he wants it, that
may be screwed over by the Democrats. Right?
So no matter what side you're on, wait
for outcomes to make something go yes, positive.
Winnings, people are posting, before we even really
know what's happening just yet. Now an interesting
overlap,
There's been a lot of information like this
flying around too from people sharing
fake information. But this is how this tends
to work. And then it works both ways,
where people then dismiss what he may do
that might be good because they think it's
fake. And, off the side of that, people
then share false information that gets at people
thinking that more has happened that hasn't even
happened yet. In this case, it was that
he spent,
sent $2,000,000,000
through FEMA, which is weird because simultaneously talking
about removing FEMA.
Point is there's a lot of manipulators out
there. And this very well could be democrats
trying to make Trump look bad or not.
The point is just about being objective and
making sure we're checking the facts. And if
we can't prove it, then we don't pretend
we know one way or the other.
This one is about the Epstein list.
Everybody should think that's a good thing, guys.
Nobody should say we don't want to see
but I just have a really hard time
believing that that's gonna happen the way it
is. And if we get a list,
how do we ever really know if it's
the full information just like with JFK?
But we should still hope for something to
come out so we can then vet something
and continue to ask questions. But, again, the
idea of after Patel and the FBI, that
ultimately this will be I I just I'm
very suspicious about this. And, obviously, you should
know why. Of course, planning will frame it
as being against Trump even though it's not
Trump or Biden or anyone. It's just the
government. And I think your government is compromised
in this exact way. All well, I mean,
as a general reality, not maybe every single
person.
But so if that's the case and I'm
pretty sure anybody
objective
can recognize that it's not democrat or republican
unique. Maybe it slants more towards the democrats.
I mean, I would just say it does.
I think it's pretty obvious.
But there's a lot of republicans that are
involved in this, and I think that really
the big picture is that it's not a
partisan dynamic.
But this person says, Trump, we know you
took yourself off the list. And that's a
fair point seeing as how there's a lot
of information that very clearly suggest that he
is on that list.
But it's you know, the point is there's
a lot of other, you know, he says
this or he said he was a great
guy, but he didn't really you know, Dershowitz
only was in his underwear with a massage.
There's always weird narratives. Or was that the
other guy? I think it was Dershowitz. Giuliani
had his own thing. The point is I'm
pretty sure we objectively
can see that they're all
interconnected on this.
But as this is being stated, the point
is,
oh, this person this was the point saying,
well, have they released the JFK or MLK
files?
Right? So we're act we're already kind of
jumping the gun a little bit when this
hasn't even technically happened yet. And as Michael
Tracey said, to come back to the first
point, the executive order does not even actually
bring about the disclosure. It only calls for
a creation of a plan
to to
to seek out the possibility
of doing that. Sorta like a task force
to see it out. Doesn't mean it won't
happen. But you're starting to feel these things
with everything else that's been going on so
far. All of the very, very, very major
deviations with Stargate, mRNA, artificial intelligence, World Economic
Forum, all these different things,
there's very real reason to go, this may
not even be what you know, there's reason
to have doubt.
But question everything, consider all possibilities. Don't all
of a sudden assume he's wrong, just, you
know, question it. It's simple, guys. But this
right now gives me doubt. And I should
give anybody objective doubt.
Legal man says this in his opinion, the
sheer number of accounts cheering Trump's declassifying
the MLK files, JFK, RFK files is mind
bending. How can people be this naive? Whatever
documents they're releasing are documents they want to
come out. I I happen to agree with
that mindset.
I don't know why anybody in these powerful
positions would ever end up releasing something that
would undermine their own power structure. The only
reason it would make sense is if you
somehow see them as 2 different things. It's
not.
Simple.
But that's how they play the 2 party
paradigm against people. But he goes on to
say, it's been 55 years plus. Whatever they
want protected is long gone and will never
be released or seen. Whatever is being released
has been con concocted specifically to be released.
Just endless lies and counter lies to create
rabbit trails. It's my and that's the kind
of 5th generation warfare stuff we're talking about,
like, very surface level of it, but part
of it. Like, creating these false these false
realities.
I said, it's mind boggling how naive people
are. We really don't have any chance when
people are this easy to fool. They're laughing
at you. Now, sadly, I agree, but it's
his opinion, and it it is opinion. Hopefully,
you're at least considering
that that's where we are. And maybe even
if it makes it easier for you to
think about, maybe Trump doesn't even know that.
Now, lastly, another
positive thing?
Well, I guess depends on where you're coming
from. Constitutional amendment to allow Trump 3rd term
introduced to the house. Now, this is hilarious
to me, guys, because I'm even still to
this moment.
I'm seeing people go, you're being trolled. It's
like, okay. Well, how at what point do
you stop seeing it as a troll? After
it becomes a law? Or, you know, when
it becomes introduced as a as a possible
amendment to congress, is that suddenly are you
just now are they playing congress? Like, it's
just funny how long they can play this
game where it's all a big grift or
rather that's the wrong word. It is. But
it's troll. We're just playing you to get
the democrats to freak out until suddenly we
do it anyway. Gulf of America, you're all
being played and now it's a great thing.
You know, it's like, okay. Well, did you
always I mean, were you trolling us with
the troll comments? So, like, you know, it's
just really funny. The point is it's a
game. It's easy to pretend like it's all
a big game because you're not sure because
they don't really know. They don't know what
Trump's thinking. They like to pretend they do
because q said. But the overall point is
that they want it to be fake if
that makes them feel less stupid about how
bad it looks, but then suddenly it happens
and now we're forced, let's rationalize why it's
the best thing in the world. That's not
the majority in my opinion. Not even close,
I don't think.
My point is this came out a while
ago,
and they said, you're that's ridiculous. You're being
played. It's all a big joke. They just
wanna see you guys freak out. Snowflakes crying
on the ground. Okay. Well, here we are.
Now even then, still, it could be some
kind of a move, not like a a
game of, like, it's all a big play,
but, like, this could be done in an
effort to get some kind of other political
move maneuverability.
That's politics for you. But this is very
real. K? This is and now there's other
articles being written about how they regardless, this
doesn't it one, it it probably won't even
come to pass. But even if it does,
it probably still won't mean that Trump will
get a 3rd turn. But it's all certainly
possible.
And I met this is dictatorship stuff, guys.
I mean, this is what we've called out
about Netanyahu, what they've called out about Putin.
It's the the same thing where you just
alter the the sir circumstances to allow what
you want to be the case.
I find it to be pretty alarming. But
wait and see what actually happens because very
well that it might not even actually get
passed by by the house or the senate.
But I was I I'd be surprised if
it did. But if it's being introduced in
the house, it's not a joke.
Interesting.
Now, here's here's an interesting story I felt
the need to comment on in in a
very broad way. Because, look, right out of
the gate, I wanted to I hope it's
very clear
that in
in no way
am I ever trying to suggest any part
of the government is,
you know like, if you don't the well,
left or right, the government, as my opinion,
is always trying to cheat you. That's just
what they do. I know maybe I'm a
pessimist, but, guys, our history
is obvious. Like, yeah, it's like the old
saying, you're not if you're not a pessimist
at this point pessimist, or, you know, if
you're not paranoid, the old saying, you're not
paying attention, guys. They have been cheating and
robbing and lying to us our entire lives.
There's also things you could point out that
some people at some points did good. Right?
I mean, I that's how I see it.
I really genuinely think we don't have a
lot of example of how the US government
has treated us. But the point is
that overall,
I think that there's obvious and I I'll
show you the clip that I I broke
down before
of of malfeasance or straight up criminality in
California
and all over the government, every left and
right part of it. But my point in
saying all that is to say that don't
read this first part as in any way
arguing that the California government is you know,
state government is not corrupt. I think it's
obvious.
But it's interesting how information gets kind of
manipulated in all of this. So this is
about a story from Folsom Dam. I literally
grew up right down the, like, right down
the road from this. This is California. Right?
I grew up in Sacramento. I even lived
in Folsom, like, right around the corner from
this. I mean, I fish in this area,
so I'm very familiar
with essentially what the general information is about
this area. Doesn't mean I know exactly what
each person's doing in the government, right? But
let me show you my thought on this.
So this person puts this out. It's already
been, like, you know, whatever community noted by
Twitter.
Gavin Evans or Derek Evans, excuse me, who
is
a former member of the white of the
WV House, former January 6th political prisoner,
basically saying, Gavin Newsom says there's not a
spigot that can be turned on to solve
the cry water crisis.
Now, again, I'll show this at the end,
but the absurd reality of how many I
mean, this this is what? I wrote over
$5,000,000,000
from Trump and Biden's last administration that have
gone to California alone
over from, like this is generally 2016 to
today.
I have, like, 4 times a year with
1,000,000,000, half a $1,000,000,000
in some cases for water infrastructure.
That that doesn't have to guarantee they won't
have a problem, but
my point is, like, where in the hell
is all this going? Which I that right
there, that to me is criminality. Like, there's
something going on, but it's not unique to
California. But the point is,
in this case, when he says there's not
a spigot that we could turn on to
solve the problem,
you can decide if you think that's specifically
true. I don't think I don't think there's
just a the point he's trying to make
is there's not a knob he can turn
to just make more water.
But whatever you think about that, he goes
on to say, here's a video of 20,000
cubic feet per second of water that's purposefully
being redirected into the ocean in California.
Now, the point is not whether or not
this couldn't be utilized in different ways. Because
what you're looking at is the fulsome dam
and runoff. Like, basically, I'll go over the
information
about how this works. And sure, there's criticisms
for how this could be utilized differently, but
to be clear, it does not run into
the ocean. Outside of running into the river,
and in some cases, later running from that
into the ocean. And I'll show you the
information. So the facts matter here. Because all
this to me seems to be is an
effort to make it into a partisan point
about a larger agenda that has nothing to
do with whether people care about California or
the water for people or, you know, it's
really about these larger building narratives about Democrats
versus Republicans, about the CIA telling you some
evil thing that happened in California about the
fires, and I'll get into it. I think
we're being played a lot of serious ways,
in some cases, using things that need to
be fixed. But, ultimately, when they do it
in this grandiose way, we miss the actual
problem. How often do I talk about this?
Now Jimmy highlighted this in saying, when I
saw this during the record breaking historic rains
in California 12 months ago, I looked into
why they do this, which is the runoff,
and I'll show you why. It turns out
they never built enough reservoirs. That's a I
agree with that. Now I don't say I
don't argue that's why they necessarily have the
runoff of the water, but flatly agree that
they do not. I think we're being abused
in a lot of ways, specifically in California,
with the abuse of the funds
and not taking actions needed. Because, guys, it's
a self fulfilling prophecy. If you have issues,
you get more funding. And that's not the
way it should work, but that's how these
governments operate. Left and right across our country.
So if they don't do it or solve
it or don't have enough water, well, look.
We just showed you. I'll show it at
the end. They keep getting more money. So
it's their it's and I think there's a
game that where they play back and forth
with each other. But then he goes on
to say, even though 10 years ago California
passed prop 1, specifically mandates building reservoirs, 10
years later, not one has been built nor
has construction even started on 1. Like, the
we need to demand to know where this
money goes. But if you're gonna do that,
make sure you apply it to more than
just California because it's not unique to California.
I would argue that Gavin Newsom is uniquely
criminal in a lot of ways, but this
problem is not unique to California. But so
just to be clear, I agree. Jimmy makes
a good point in the idea of the
of the money and the funding and the
reservoirs. But what's interesting is about the the
point this guy's making in regard to the
runoff. So this says the the this is
the Folsom Dam auxiliary spillway. It doesn't dump
water into the ocean. It says it prevents
the flooding of Sacramento. That's true. Easily provable.
From there, it goes via the American River
into the Delta and the State Water Project.
Let me show you some stuff on this
that I think is very
important. Oh, did I open that secondarily? I
think I did. So here's just the first,
the page from the Folsom Dam, just to
basically show what it says. The spillway will
include a a 1100 foot long approach channel
that will funnel the water from the lake
into the spillway, a control structure
with 6 submerged gates that will be controlled
in coordination with the gates on the main
dam to control water releases. So that's this
larger area here, and the one you're looking
at is more of a small side one.
The point is, this is about
releasing water to avoid other issues in regard
to flooding. That's only one aspect of it.
And so a lot of the time you're
gonna see this and it doesn't indicate any
waste of water, not necessarily.
Can. But here's the interesting part. This is
what grok, which I you know, just so
it's clear, I pretty much avoid using these
things other than certain circumstances
because I don't like to help train their
program. But in this case, I think it's
interesting because it's Grok. Right? So this is
what is get their Grok is being
fed information through Elon Musk's infrastructure.
So it's at least a little bit more
interest. Like, for example, if we asked some
kind of whatever you would see, some Google
thing, they go, it's democrats or whatever, probably.
But this case,
arguably,
it would be influenced
more so by what the Elon sphere is
pointing out. Right? So does Folsom Dam water
go in the ocean? Here's what it says.
The water from Folsom Dam primarily serves several
purposes before potentially reaching the ocean. Water supply.
The water is used for municipal and industrial
water supply for the Sacramento region and parts
of the Central Valley. Make sure that didn't
change as if I look like it was
smaller for some reason. Oh, that's right. That's
right. The bottom's right there.
So right out of the gate, it it
is used
for water supply, agriculture, a significant
portion. And, obviously, you could argue that this
is not the actual fact, but my point
is this is what is stated as the
reality. To best of my knowledge, this is
what it is.
And what saying it flows right into the
ocean is simply inaccurate. It's, I think, meant
to deceive people. A significant portion of the
water you just saw is used for irrigation
in California's Central Valley, one of the most
agriculture productive areas in the world, Hydroelectric power.
Right? So even right there, you're still this
is still being used for other like the
Hoover Dam dynamic.
Folsom Dam generates hydroelectric power, which means some
water is used in the process of generating
electricity. So even if you were saying it
was being wasted, it's not in a sense
being wasted, it's being used to generate electricity
and then being dumped somewhere. But the point
is the water that's going through there is
still also being used for something else. Flood
control is one of the main ones on
top of the water supply point. One of
the main purposes of Folsom Dam is flood
control, Managing the flow of the American River
to prevent flooding in Sacramento.
Now this is where you get into the
dynamic of how that can be abused. Right?
Like, maybe you they're releasing when it's not
necessary. But even then, the water is still
not being just dumped out into nowhere. It
is still being utilized.
So what I experienced while I was there
was the idea of how this can be,
you know, the the ebb and flow of
that water in regard to stopping it from
flooding in other locations. And I think that's
pretty easy to prove. The question is if
you think that's abused in certain circumstances, wouldn't
it just have to be?
Hard to say. But it says I mean,
I argue you know my opinion. I think
governments would abuse everything anytime they can and
get away with it. But it's not to
say that it goes right in the ocean.
But it says environmental flows. There's also there
are also mandated environmental flows to support habitats
in the Sacramento River and its tribu tributaries
which can lead water towards the Delta and
eventually, the Pacific Ocean. Right? So the majority
of this ends up being utilized,
and at the very least from there goes
into the river to the Delta, which then
goes to the ocean, and that's not the
same thing as he was saying. But it's
simple. Right? So I don't know. I just
personally I I grew up here. And so
I think it's interesting. I come from a
personal example on this, and I just think
it's interesting how many people seem to continue
I I just don't understand how why it's
so much more prevalent right now.
I guess it's the Twitter dynamic. It's what
Elon and their inner circle like, I think
somebody's pointing out earlier around, like, the fire
dynamic, which I wasn't gonna get into. But
the point about arguing that there's this weird
ecosystem around Elon Musk where people are just
kind of grabbing all sorts of content from
under, like, smaller accounts
and usually changing it, altering it, misrepresenting it,
and then that gets boosted because it's really
just about controlling the flow and where it
comes from.
I agree with that. And sometimes it is
true information, other times it's completely altered, otherwise
it's flatly sometimes it's flat like, just
simply dishonest.
So I just wanted to point that out.
It's an interesting story, but it's it's it's
frustrating how, like, these are the kind of
things that blow up out of proportion, and
all of a sudden you get people taking
action where there's really nothing happening,
and then they blame that on something else
and it becomes some George Soros point. I
mean, there's truth to a lot of these
points.
And then when they use them in false
context, it
makes the reality of that
almost near impossible to change or solve.
So on that note though, again, as I
pointed out, I'd recommend you watch this. It's,
like, 6 minutes long. It blows my mind.
How much money I made this point I
did this like a decade ago, or maybe
5 years ago,
about this exact point back then, going, what
is going on here? EPA gives a 182,000,000
for drinking water in California, and wastewater,
infrastructure.
You know? 95,000,000.
And this is year by year, multiple times
a year, almost 200,000,000.
100 another 200,000,000, 85,000,000,
500,000,000
for all for water infrastructure. That just seems
obscene. Like, how how we can't acknowledge that?
But that's the point. We can.
But if we're making this about something larger,
that will never change. And you know who
loves that? Your government.
Both sides of it.
Oh, and then by the way, thank you
to is He's the one that put this
He clipped this out for me. The I
should've said this I was gonna say it
to begin and I forgot.
I really do want you guys to continue
tr- doing this if
you want to. So he clipped this out
from our show, tag me in it,
and I'm and I'll and it's I'm and
I'll share it. Like, I just the point
is, it's really hard for me. I don't
have the the bandwidth to constantly
clip the you know, make these clips and
parse everything out. So if you guys like
a part in the show, even if you
just tag, like, just quote what I said
and put the link, I'll I'll share it.
That way somebody you know, put a timestamp,
for example. And then that way somebody goes,
oh, what's this? What are they talking about?
Oh, it's in Ryan's show. You can go
watch it right there. Or make the clip
yourself. Just help us get the content out.
There's so much that gets buried. And be
get and that's one of the downsides of
having a long show. That at the moment,
the best I can do with all that's
going on around me, but I I just
have to get all this content out. On
top of that, on another side of it,
Biden's $6,000,000,000 promise to make your drinking water
safe literally while they're continuing to force fluoride
into your, you know, body. Just wanna make
that point. So clearly, they don't really care
about keeping your water safe. On another side
note. But another quick note around this I
thought it was important to highlight,
there's this it's just this really interesting chaos
that's boiled up around this conversation. Same thing
I was saying before, and this is about
the WHO.
It's really fascinating to me.
I I I really do think this is
about people who wanna make it that we're
going after Trump, which I'm going after anybody
in government that I think is being dishonest,
left or right, and, really, I see it
as all the same.
So in a in a sense, you're not
wrong, but it's about all of it. Right?
I'm just it's it's unique unique to one
side or the other. My point is that
in this conversation about the WHO and Gavi
from last administration,
this this conversation has gotten crazy.
And the only point that I'm trying to
make, that I've made the whole time, is
that under the administration, let's just say under
the US government,
in the year this took place,
money was removed from WHO and then money
went back to Gavi,
billions over the top of 1,000,000.
So fine. If you wanna make it about
somebody else, make it about somebody else. The
only point we're trying to make is today,
when they pull out of the WHO, maybe
we shouldn't start jumping for joy because last
time, money went to Gavi that went to
the WHO through Bill Gates, and that was
Trump's administration.
Now there's conversation
about the the the con the dynamic of
funding that's from USAID that was signed beforehand,
but, guys, the point is the same. It's
the same conversation every time. They fund through
USAID to these same things, including Gavi,
long before Trump's administration. So those are not
unique. The difference is that Donald Trump was
in power, in this case, for the people
that are making it about Donald Trump, and
he could have changed that if he wanted
to and did not. And the timing of
it is in quiet so the only point
is that money went away from WHO and
then many, many, many more or billions on
top over 1,000,000 went through Gavi to WHO.
It's it's very simple. And that's become some
grandiose really, it seems to be that they're
going after Whitney Webb. That's really what it
seems like to me. That they're just, for
some reason, trying to go after her to
make this crazy point about how you're being
dishonest and because she's not. It's just wild
to me. But, anyway, all that is to
say, I wanted to reiterate this because Jason
put a clip out about it, where I
simply go directly through j Robert, excuse me,
Derek's article about it from the time, or
this was the one I did the show
in, but Robert's article is linked in the
show notes in that show. And it's just
the sources are all there. It's right down
the list and he goes right through the
sources, he walks right through the funding, and
he doesn't try to make it about it's
very very objective.
People just have a hard time with that
today, apparently. But I and this is interesting
to me because
on top of making that point, this is
why I brought it up again. Well, guess
what? Turns out Trump says he's considering rejoining
the WHO
anyway.
I just I just laughed out loud when
I saw that. And so here, and I
this is the same, I just put these
out. For those who missed all the verifiable
source material or chose to ignore for personal
or partial reasons, now I'm specifically talking about
the people pushing back on Whitney in the
conversation. You know, there there's plenty of conversation.
Courtney and I had a great conversation about
a lot of things in our last pirate
stream. So the only thing this was directed
at is the people out there trying to
misrepresent people like Whitney Webb. But I simply
said, well, isn't that interesting? Oh, you know
what? I think I forgot to grab this,
of course, because it was further down the
link. Let me play it for you real
quick. It's now to be
clear, it's not 100% we're gonna rejoin. That's
not what I'm saying. Not that nobody honest
is actually saying that. It is simply that
he has already floated what he tends to
do, the idea that it might happen. He
might go back if they give him a
better deal.
That doesn't mean it's gonna happen for sure.
But it's dishonest to pretend like he didn't
mean exactly what he just said. Because just
like the idea we just made about or
the point we made about the Gulf of
America
or the 3rd potential term, Those were all
pushed back on as complete fake stories that
you all fell for and then they happened
anyway. Right? So it's the same thing every
single time.
Here
is Donald Trump already bringing this up. And,
oh, and by the way, what he says
in this is interesting,
is ultimately that
the the only reason he didn't really go
back the first time is because it was
so popular that he left, that he doesn't
want to. It's really continuing to show you
that it's all about placating you, I think.
But, on top of that, as we're gonna
get into next, there's already more association with
Bill Gates happening, have operation 2.0 or Warfstein
2.0 that's building, at least as we can
see so far. And that's Gates who already
made that point. And I think there's already
more overlap with Trump and Davos and connections
here. I think the same thing is happening.
I just don't think they're as clumsy, which
is, you know,
I don't know. Some usually, they seem to
be. But maybe in this case, they don't
seem to be as clumsy to go right
down the same path knowing that you're paying
attention. That's just me.
China's paying 39,000,000
to have 1,400,000,000
people. We pay 500,000,000
we have. Nobody knows what the hell we
have. Does anyone know? We have so many
people pouring in. We have no idea.
We go up, but we're going down a
little bit now. You don't mind that, do
you? It's gonna take That was a nice
save. He didn't know the number, but he
saved that part well.
Gonna take some bad ones out. I would
do 4 years ago, but Biden immediately went
back for
even more money. I mean, he went back
and, you know, I they offered me a
39,000,000. They said, we'll let you back in
at 39. So we're gonna reduce it from
500 to 39. I turned them down
because it became so popular. I didn't know
if it would be well received even at
39.
Right. Okay. So not whether it's best for
the American people or whether it's good for
the government or good for the country. No.
No. It's just you you guys wouldn't have
liked it, so I didn't wanna do it.
Well, technically, that's kinda the idea we're supposed
to pretend this country is is we based
on what you want or not. But he's
not talking about the country, he's talking about
specifically as base, not the same thing. So
I find it interesting that the that we're
supposed to pretend that these people are the
adults in the room, right? And they're making
the hard decisions for the benefit of the
country. I just think that's funny. But, you
know, many many ways to look at it.
But maybe we would consider doing it again.
I don't know. Maybe we would. They have
to clean it up a little bit. But
Okay.
Well, that's how Trump operates.
He just made it clear, despite what you
would like to pretend, that that may very
well happen.
Even the simple possibility, should they clean it
up a little bit? Of course, the narrative
will probably become, well, that means his that
was his secret cue message that we're gonna
change it all completely. Maybe he will. But
let's not be stupid enough to assume broadly,
blindly into the direction of what you want
to be the case so then you end
up passing government,
allowing them to get away with whatever they
want. But interestingly enough, already saying that might
be the case.
I just think that's almost laugh out loud
ridiculous on the heels of what we just
talked about.
China pays 39,000,000
for 1,400,000,000
and we're paying 500 He just went right
back into the comparison because that's how p
you know, he just show the point is,
they're gonna go, well, we want a better
deal in China. So if we get a
better deal in China, we gotta take it.
Like, someone like Clinton didn't do it, so
we have to.
Lurch right into it because he told me,
you know, it's it's just so lazy how
these things work in my mind. Of course,
that's my opinion.
But I wanted to point that out. So
now we've got the speaking of Davos, World
Economic Forum dynamic. We got the, at least,
the floated idea that he may be going
back to the WHO if they clean it
up a little bit and give him a
low price.
But if this is supposed to be the
enemy of the world, what does it matter
how much it costs or what he give
the price gives? I think we all know
where this goes if we're not lying to
ourselves in partisan ways. Now really, a quick
a quick point that I think is important
on this is this
the it's it's
I mean, there's a couple points I'm gonna
give you right here to start on the
segment that are kinda funny and a little
way deriding, but I think it's important to
see. Because I sense more and more the
conservatives are the ones calling this out A
lot.
And this is so,
slow news day, Steve making this point
about bro flakes, which I just thought was
really funny. This is about, like, snowflakes. Because
we've been talking about the the woke right,
which is very, very obvious. I mean, quite
frankly, there's more large right accounts right now
that have been calling out the woke right
because they can see the censorship. They can
see the same tactics in censoring hate speech.
It's the same damn thing.
This is a, will come at a certain
point about the CIA and the Wuhan discussion.
The CIA is being rebranded as the hero
all of a sudden. Big surprise. This person
says, these MAGA flakes annoy me. Snow Steve
says, I'm gonna start calling them bro flakes.
It's nice. It's funny. And then he's let
let it be known Steve owns the right
to broflakes. I bet you somebody takes that
and claims it for their own. But he
says, noun definition 1, members of the MAGA
cult who correctly called out the leftover
and called out the left for over the
last 8 years for their blind devotion to
a destructive transhumanist
ideology,
now engaging in the exact same zealotry on
behalf of Trump, Musk, Ellison, Altman, and Zuck.
Right? So now they're not calling it out
is the point. Brophyx. I think that's funny.
Jason Bessler put out this meme, this cartoon,
if you will. But this we've seen this.
You know, the dog sitting in the room
with the house burning down. This is fine.
That's that's where we that's what a lot
of us see right now. And if you
read through them, escalating the drug war, seed
oil lobbyist, chief of the USDA,
AI biometric surveillance, $500,000,000,000
for mRNA, artificial intelligence tracking, Palantir,
virtual border walls, Zionist Warhawk cabinet, Tech Bro
Collusion, World Coins, Stargate Data Centers, Technocratic Control
Grid. Every single one of these things are
not just hypothetical. They're literally happening in front
of us in such rapid succession, it blows
my mind. And it goes, at least it's
not Kamala.
I don't even think that's the majority. You
tell me what you think. In the in
the sense of saying, I think more people
see this right now than I've ever noticed.
Jason also puts this out, picture of Elon
Musk pointing at the screen with the burning
house, and says, what if the dismantling of
the old dying globalist paradigm
is just to perform a deploy for Trump
and the tech bro conglomerate
to reconfigure the military and surveillance complex into
a technocratic public private partnership or alliance, wet
dream.
Who would be stupid enough to fall for
it?
I mean, Garland Nixon made a similar point
on saying, hey, wake up about the idea
that this is sort of like a corporate
reorganization.
It really does feel that way.
Now we talked about star Stargate, Derek wrote
the article. Stargate, Trump partners with technocrats to
promote mRNA injections, AI and transhumanism.
It's a great article by the way, really
well done, really breaks a lot of it
down in different parts. Ellison and Oracle,
Altman and and Worldcoin
and, and OpenAI and Checkatypt.
And, was it Mayo Masa?
Was that was that was his name?
Oh, Masayoshi.
And this this is from SoftBank. Right? Remember,
the CEO of SoftBank is now is in
charge of Stargate as well as the star
SoftBank element being in charge of the finances.
I think that's very relevant, and I wanted
to make this point again. So go through
this article to understand all these things coming
together. We're gonna go through a couple points
here to make this clear.
Now the first part is about the mRNA.
Now this is a great clip. I'm gonna
play it. It's if, I think I've played
most of it.
Sense Receptor put this out. Now she's they're
basically just quoting what Catherine Ross and Fitz
is saying on her on her show.
And
argue it's she's claiming it's operation speed or
or excuse me, warp speed 2.0,
which is a lot of a lot what
a lot of us were considering.
And we and interesting that she makes the
claim on the back of what Bill Gates
was just talking about.
And I think realize, this is not just
about another vaccination injection program.
This is 2.0, guys. This is an update.
We're talking about the
what I what I simply called,
wherever it was
where was that?
I I always do that today. Should've done
it. There it is. Right there.
The AI biomedical control grid. Because it's not
just about one side of this, guys. We're
now talking about the Internet of bio nano
things, the nanotechnology
internally.
You know, the this is not my opinion.
I guess we could argue they're making it
all up, but they are outright forcing this
out there, and people are pretending like it's
not happening.
And then they roll out an AIM or
an h I mean, it's like, my god.
Exactly what we're worried about. So let me
play this for you. Investor banker investment banker.
Excuse me. Former h u h u d,
HUD official. And we've spoken with her a
lot about her experiences there. And founder of
the and remember the last one we talked
about? The last interview we had where she
was talking about not just the interesting and
this is before the election. The interesting dynamic
of the financial side of it but also
that she believes that the I
the
neuroscience, neuro weapons are real
inaction, like, in use dynamic,
which is terrifying. And which means they're controlling
the way people think and feel and act.
And you may not believe that guys, but
the science has been discussed. It's open. They're
pushing it. People like doctor James
Giordano from the US government has been saying
this forever and it's they he claimed it
was rolled out during COVID.
Founder of the solar report, Kathryn Austin Fitz,
describes on a recent episode of children's health
defense series Financial Rebellion how the newly proposed
Stargate AI pro project proposed by the Trump
administration
is simply Operation Warp Speed 2 point o
and will ultimately be funded by American taxpayers
despite claims that'll be privately funded. Furthermore, Fitz
notes the mRNA injection mega factories
are being built around the world according to
the feedback that she's received from the investment
community. And realize, all these data center dynamics,
like, these are overlapped in my opinion. My
Musk is already involved with the mRNA micro
fact, the the mic,
that's what they call micro factories. Right? Or
I think that's what he framed them as.
I think that what they're building out
is not just about the AI infrastructure.
And I think I think these are intertwined.
And it says, signaling no drawback to the
wildly damaging and dangerous bioweapons technology.
Bioweapons technology g is his term. He's saying
not that what they're saying. But I'll play
this for you.
It's important to listen.
Here we go with vaccines
again. You know, this is operation warp speed
2.0.
So remember, Trump Trump funded operation warp speed
1 point o. He authorized it. He put
18,000,000,000 behind it. Now we're talking about 500,000,000,000.
It was presented as private investment.
I'm calling WHOI on that. It's not private
investment because a lot of the people involved
are government contractors.
You know? And and now that we're running
the government,
finances on a secret basis,
you know, you're not gonna come up with
this 500,000,000
privately. It's it's base one way or another,
it's coming through the government. Really quick point.
I'm not gonna try to stop it a
lot on this, but is this simply we
talk about the CIA cutout dynamic, DARPA and
XAI.
Right? It's the same dynamic. Total information awareness,
Palantir.
So today, we're living in this fascistic dynamic
where we have, I think, provable examples of
government CIA cutouts that are being presented as
independent companies, sort of like the Israeli startup
dynamic. IG, I wonder where this all comes
from.
So this is a Manhattan kind of project
to win at AI.
Now if the cover story is vaccines and
they're really serious,
what you need to know is that mRNA
vaccines,
first of all, is not a vaccine. I'm
assuming they're calling it a vaccine because they
want indemnification.
MRNA
mRNA technology is poison.
It's toxic.
There is an excellent book that Sutrat Bakhti
and doctor Michael Palmer wrote from Doctors for
COVID Ethics. It's up at Solari. It's up
at the doctors for COVID Ethics. It's called
mRNA vaccine text
toxicity. Mary Holland wrote the foreword. I wrote
the afterward,
and it explains
in great detail how
how what a killing technology this is. So
we're talking about technology
that, you know, we know of as of
today based on Denny Rancour's work, Mark Skidmore's
work. This has killed and disabled millions of
people.
And so,
the the notion that we're going and and
you need indemnify. If you're a pharmaceutical company
and you're injecting mRNA technology
into people,
you know, you need indemnification
because
financially, you can't afford to kill that many
people without being indemnified. Right?
So this is very dangerous stuff, and there
are 2 things that are dangerous to the
average person.
1 is they're going to take all your
data, including private health care data, consolidate it
into
an operation where it can be consolidated
with all other data in a way that
builds
a digital control grid. This is
the infrastructure for the digital concentration camp. But
second, if they really do give people
mRNA technologies
or or or inject us with mRNA,
a lot of people are gonna die. And
what's frightening is we've seen that the adverse
event coming off of mRNA injections is cancer.
So now so now
Let me take you back. I just want
to take you back to before the COVID
injections rolled out.
I receive a business newsletter, which I find
to be very accurate and very good.
And and
in I think it was the summer of
of 2020
before the injections rolled out, they started in
December,
I got a copy, and they had just
a a little paragraph or so that said,
investors are very excited about what they're gonna
get with mRNA technology because
they're after COVID injections are made. They're gonna
make injections, and then they proceeded to describe
a whole series of
diseases that were in fact the adverse events
from vaccines.
So if you look at the business model,
it's fantastic
because
you give people poison,
they get symptoms of toxicity,
then you declare those disease, and then you
make another poison to give them. Do you
know Sort of like
the
Sackler family
and opioids,
and then on the record discussing how they
could profit from the destruction, and so they've
cert they sold Narcan.
And this is there's the emails have been
released. This is provable. Of course, they never
really got held accountable. They got some financial
fines for one of the most destructive things
that ever happened to this country. But that's
the model, guys. That's how our governments operate
with the private sector.
And I mean and around and around you
go, it's an incredibly,
profitable
financial treadmill.
And we have seen investors all around the
world being proposed
to build these huge mega factories of just
in time vaccines. So this is happening not
just in the US, but if my feedback
from the investment community is correct, you know,
these mega factories are being built all around
the world, and they're planning. Now
finally, here's the question.
You know, the people who've been making this
stuff,
you know, when when the injections come out
and get injected, what we're finding in
in
the materials is all sorts of materials that
nobody knows what they are. So we have
secret ingredients again.
So the so the question
is, for the for the health care component
of this, what's the real goal?
And your guess is good as mine. But
if you look at how
extraordinarily
dangerous mRNA technology is,
you know, what you need to know is,
1,
you've got a real
real privacy issue here
because you have
many of the top contractors,
government contractors, private corporations in the world who's
gonna have unbelievable
access to all your data. They're gonna have
more data on you than you have on
you because it's gonna be 247
coming in on the, you know, sort of
the digital technology. So you've got a real
privacy issue, number 1. And and number 2,
if there's any effort to force you to
take this stuff,
you're really talking about a mass atrocity. So
this is Warp Speed 2.0,
combined with an incredible
competition between us and
China over AI, and
it's extraordinary.
And
one of the things that was interesting
is if you
if you look at the record
of Ellison and Altman,
you know, who we could go into, it
was remarkable that the president would stand up
and and propose putting a half a $1,000,000,000,000
into their pocket
Right. To do these things. So
It just doesn't make any sense whatsoever with
everything that the the his support base argues.
I I would say if you if you
were the people who've been supporting Trump on
the theory that he's gonna help Americans
and the great poisoning,
it's it's sure to say you were sadly
disappointed. And the one only thing I could
do to make you feel better is I
think the real goal here is to build
the data data center infrastructure for a control
grid and a digital ID and an all
digital financial system. Health care is just the
excuse.
I hope you guys are listening.
Her predictions have been right more than I
mean, I don't I can't even think of
a time where she's made a prediction that
I don't think has actually come to pass.
I mean, this guy's this is obvious.
And I think most people that are, I
think most people even in the paradigm are
aware of this right now. Like, I don't
see how you could look at this unless
you are just generally dishonest. Like, pretending to
fight things only for the game of it
all. Like, if you genuinely are fighting the
things that we're talking about, I don't know
how you can't see what this is all
is right now. It's alarming for anybody. Now
on that note, it's interesting to think about
RFK's role in all of this. Right? I
mean, even if he still comes to pass,
and that's assuming he is what he seems
to be in some health cases,
along aside from continuing to support the genocide
in Israel,
is the idea that this is so counter
to anything even remotely
maha or whatever you thought that was.
MRNA is like the core central part pillar
of what they thought they were fighting.
And he rolls out an mRNA program right
on the second day. Where's RFK Junior?
So I just think that's a lot I
mean, this is these are the things that
are like, that whole side of the conversation,
those people are terrified, rightly so, because they're
they were in this believing that Trump was
changing because of RFK.
And now that this doesn't seem to be
happening more than anybody, those aren't the people
that are gonna keep going Trump anyway. They're
they're like, woah. Damn it. Like, those are
the comments we're getting where they're going, damn
it. I should've listened to you. Right? This
this is it's obvious right now. So here
is an article, this is from the 22nd.
RFK Jr confirmation.
Mike Pence's group urges senders to reject his
pick. So right now, I've seen some floated
things about confirmation dates being picked. I I
haven't seen it. Like, I it's hard to
tell right now. But I think there's gonna
come a time. I mean, who for all
I know like, it's just interesting what's been
happening. He's been very quiet. There hasn't been
a lot of conversation.
He hasn't been speaking up. He hasn't been
talked to. He hasn't been in conferences with
Trump. Where is he? It just it doesn't
make much sense. Now, I something may happen.
I predicted in our last conversation with the
IMA that I've I'm I've I've I need
to put that up. I got I was
lot going on yesterday. I wanna make sure
I pub put that out on TLAB as
well. Derek Osha is the last one
on conscious resistance. The whole point is for
the IMA to sort of not be one
I've been wanting to make sure we got
it away from just TLAB so it's a
a group dynamic. My point is I'm I'll
put that on TLAB if you happen to
miss that. We had a great panel with
the IMA around exactly, like, predictions for the
next year and the next administration.
And one of the things I I said
and it's really just it's based on just
my gut. That's all it is. And that's
what it was kinda just having fun with
it, thinking about what might happen. And I
I argued I don't think RFK is gonna
get confirmed.
Now it's it's a flip of the coin.
It certainly could happen. And I think that
I don't see honestly why they wouldn't, like,
look at it both ways.
I I could see why they would want
it to happen because that gives like, from
Trump's side of it because he gets a
huge win right there. And he'll gain a
lot of goodwill from people that would otherwise
not really wanna support him.
But if you think of it in the
bigger context of the non party game, the
reality of the government that's not partisan,
I don't think they want him there. I
think whatever happened like, this is just my
personal opinion. I think that he got compromised,
threatened, blackmailed, whatever it was with Israel. Because
I just don't see how you can have
an entire lifetime of information and career that
challenges this one moment, and then you just
throw it all out because Israel. It just
didn't make any sense.
But I could be wrong. My point is
that everything else he's done has been important
around COVID 19 and the health dynamic.
I don't think they want that. Even if
it's feigned, it still creates a huge problem
for the system that's built around everything the
opposite of what he says. So I kinda
get the sense that it won't happen. I
hope it does. Even with what his comments
even with his stance on Israel, I still
think it's at least a step in a
better direction. But I don't think I'll have
to wait and see. I'll include this for
you as well.
Now here, coming off of what you heard
from Trump and, you know, everything else,
and and Catherine Ross and Fizz, is the
clip we just saw from before. In case
you didn't see it. Because this is, like
every other time, this was, Bill Gates went
to meet Trump at Mar a Lago, which
by itself should've been a I mean, of
course, any other Democrat, that would've been all
you needed to see. But all the excuses,
we went there. He's trying to trap him.
He's gonna frame him. He's gonna use him
and then point him out later or expose
him. Maybe, maybe, maybe.
But all that amounts to assuming into,
you know, just making up a story that
makes you feel better about what you see
in front of you. It's certainly possible that
he's just worked with Bill Gates because he's
working with Bill Gates.
Simple. Just like last time, by the way.
The point is that he said
he's excited about this. And many of us
frame this as Operation Warp Speed 2 point
o. And now,
after this interview,
we've now seen him literally roll it out.
So in case you missed it. With Donald
Trump since the election?
Yeah. I had a chance to go have
a a long and actually quite
intriguing dinner with him. What did you discuss?
What was intriguing?
Well, we touched on a lot of things.
It was over
3 hours. To my surprise, it was, you
know, just he and I, his chief of
staff, Susie Wiles, and the person who helps
manage things for me, Larry Cohen. So the
4 of us sat there and,
was quite wide ranging.
You know, global health's the area that I
work in, and
such amazing things have happened and can happen
there.
I spoke a lot about HIV
and that the foundation's literally working on a
a cure for that. We're at an early
That is mRNA.
That's not an opinion. Guys, that is what
he's been talking about, what they're working on.
So now that he's rolled out after this
conversation
an mRNA cancer shot that's based on the
same platform that's been killing everybody,
This is the same thing. I think it's
a really hard thing to not see how
this is obviously happening. I hope I'm wrong.
Stage. And so, you know, he,
in the COVID days,
accelerated the vaccine innovation. So I Mhmm. You
know, was asking him
if maybe the same kind of thing could
be done here. And we both got, I
think, pretty excited about that. Yeah. We talked
about polio,
where,
you know, we're very close to getting that
done. But
if you if you stop,
it'll spread back
and You know, aside from the vaccine derived
polio strain that's actually what's infecting everybody, which
even the associated press covered.
It comes from the very things he forced
down their throats. This is not an accident.
Certainly, you could argue whatever you want. My
opinion is the information connects with everything else
we know. This is one level of the
same dynamic, whether it was deliberate, experiment.
It's it's obvious what's going on. And all
these connect back to Trump at this point.
So I explained
why it's been tough in Pakistan, Afghanistan.
Mhmm. We've had cases show up in Gaza.
We have case Yeah. That was the poll
that was the vaccine drive strain. That was
a public headline.
Imagine not making that point. When you're pushing
the idea of using the vaccines, the injections,
to stop the injection caused strain.
And framing that as we need to push
back. But I mean, you've basically created your
own dynamic. Think of it like the geoengineering
point. They're literally talking about doing something in
in g in stratospheric
aerosol injection that once they take the step
you can't stop and if you do it
makes the problem worse. But we're gonna do
it because the world's gonna be ending in
a week. That's what they want you to
believe. Well here you go. We're gonna literally
create a polio problem that we created with
the vaccine derived strain. And then if we
don't now if we don't keep getting these
injections, well, it's gonna roll back up. Isn't
that just like we talked about with the
COVID 19 dynamic? Well, now these people are
basically addicted to another booster?
That's at least the model they're trying to
create. I think they want people to be
so immunologic like their immune systems to be
so collapsed that you ultimately have to keep
your fix going on this. And look at
what had been happening to the people.
The people that have been taking these injections
are roundly proven to be absolutely and if
you don't think this guy is the evidence,
the science you were all screaming about is
showing you that they're sickly, that they're hurt,
that they're getting cancers. Oh, but don't worry.
You got an mRNA cancer shot coming right
around for you. This is in Africa, and
he was fascinated to hear
what he could do to
maximize the chance that during the next 4
years that incredible milestone will be achieved.
I felt like he was,
you know, energized
and,
you know, looking forward to helping to drive
innovation.
You know, I I was I was frankly
impressed with how well he
showed a lot of interest in the the
issues I I brought up.
Now on the overlapping note of this with
Stargate, I think it's super important to consider
this, and I brought this up every time
because think about the timing of this. Derek
wrote this on the 5th December 2024.
Elon Musk was working with the National Reconnaissance
Office. By the way, through Biden's administration.
If you don't understand why it's important, guys,
you're just continuing to lie to yourself. It
doesn't make sense that he's supposed to be
fighting the Democrats while he's a contractor for
the Biden administration. It's ridiculous.
And he is and was and continues to
be for the government. And he is here
contracting to build the largest spy satellite network
in the world that circles the planet for
the National Reconnaissance Office, a group that was
basically pretend that it didn't exist by the
government until the 1994,
I think.
And then revealed that they were some shadowy
entity that all these 1,000,000,000 of dollars like,
you can read the article. It's crazy.
Ultimately, they
1,000,000,000 were missing until they fund oh, here
it is. And they gave it right it's
cray this is one of the different levels
of shadowy,
deep state background
that he's working with.
This group itself
provides the reconnaissance for the Nash for the
for the,
NSA, for crying out loud. What this is
about
is creating the network that he said in
this recent interview, the the National Reconnaissance,
office director.
You can't hide because you're constantly being looked
at. And he says that Elon Musk
is going to help build the artificial intelligence
program because,
where was it right here? I've showed it
last time.
Or extend Elon Musk's role as a defense
contractor.
I shouldn't have tried to look for it
real quick. It's it's right there. It's right
in here somewhere about the artificial intel the
the whole point
is about using he claimed people the NRL
will get help from artificial intelligence. He says
no doubt Musk will be ready to offer
some assistance. The point is he's discussing Elon
Musk's overlap with this and creating the artificial
intelligence network to to basically monitor the entire
world. And then they roll out an artificial
intelligence infrastructure for $500,000,000,000
overlapping with your internal biostructure. I mean, this
needs to be concerning for anybody that's been
talking about this. But suddenly, people wanna just
ignore it because it's highlighting a person you
don't wanna call out. Now we also talked
about this in so one side of it
is about just the artificial intelligence direction. Right?
But it's and as but with as Catherine's
pointing out, this is not just it's it's
the intertwining of both of these, which is
what we've been warning about for a very
long time. The internal
biosurveillance.
This is what I entitled the show on
the 23rd. Donald Trump rolls out the AI
biomedical control grid backed by Israel and the
deep state. So I thought it was important
to highlight some more of these points as
well.
The idea of the what this is and
the inter inter the how they intersect,
but also not forgetting the soft bank overlap
and the deep state connection to all of
this, aside from the obvious that we're pointing
out.
But don't forget, as
Trump already said, and this is an older
video, but they've made this statement right up
until recent days, that they're building the biometric
control structure. So, no. That might've been I
mean, this should've been concerning when it first
got updated. It should've been concerning when he
backed it up after being elected.
Now, it needs to be even more concerning
that they rolled out the AI infrastructure
for what this will end up doing.
And I'll play it again, so you don't
forget what he was telling you.
Hey.
We will finally complete
the biometric
entry exit visa tracking system, which we need
desperately.
This system is in place,
and I will tell you, it will be
on land.
It will be on sea. It will be
in air. We will have a proper tracking
system. Yeah. If you really wanna pretend that's
about immigrants that are flying into your country
illegally because that all winds up, then you're
lying to
yourself. This is about using whatever they need
to to rationalize
the control structure we've all been telling you
is coming. As Whitney points out, hope Trump
supporters will soon catch on to how the
virtual border wall being built by companies backed
by Peter Thiel, a Bilderberg steering committee member,
is meant to serve as a Trojan horse
for digital ID
by requiring not just foreigners entering the US,
but any American traveling abroad to submit a
digital biometric entry entry exit system. As she
includes one of her articles from her limited
hangout.
Now as Derek writes,
all I kept hearing prior to the election
was that, yes, Trump and Kamala were both
funded by Zionists, technocrats, and Bilderberg group steering
committee members. Some that was part of the
conversation anyway. Some of them were ignoring all
of it, but that was one we got
a lot. Right? We asked, they're both bad,
but right? That's what we kept talking about.
But the technocracy would come slower
under Trump.
We know we heard that a lot. Right?
Only it'll buy us time, we kept hearing.
Well, unless you argued Kamala was gonna roll
it out on day 1, kinda seems like
that wasn't the case. Now, don't take this
as saying Kamala better than Trump. It's simply
an objective point about saying if you were
trying to tell us that somehow this was
gonna be slower, it's hard to see it
any faster than 2nd day. Right?
But here, the point from both of us,
which is that we're not it's not one
side or the other. Kamala and Trump, the
government left and right, it's all your government.
And using that dichotomy to force you into
this position. We both feel similar. Or the
same, I should say. And Melvin simply goes,
and here is how that's a good thing.
Half of MAGA.
And that's all we keep seeing. It doesn't
matter how many times, they could have been
the ones telling you this was never gonna
happen. The next day it happens. That's half
the crowd. Well, here's why that's a good
thing. Here's why it'll work out. Here's what
it's doing to trap the Democrats. It's always
a narrative.
It's a partisan thing. It's not unique to
left and right, and it's constant. We saw
it during COVID 19 with the Democrats. Every
single thing was a way to ignore the
obvious reality of the danger.
If you can't see the same thing happening,
again, it's a choice, guys, because they're constantly
playing this to make you not look at
it.
Now, in this point, I keep I wanna
keep highlighting how there's a lot of in
the mainstream alternative media out there that wants
to keep you focused elsewhere. So in the
midst of all of this, I just wanna
point out, this is John saying the Trump
administration's recruited the king of pedophile hunters. Now
I could be wrong, of course. But I
do find it very interesting the specific type
of content that happens at certain moments when
things like this are happening. They literally roll
out the technocratic control grid and it's pedophile
democrat. That's what you get. I said, this
is, in my opinion, all hopes that you
will stop calling out Trump's great reset.
Apparently, all they have to do is yell
pedophile and Democrat, and some will forget everything
else that was just happening, whether or not
there is a pedophile and it is a
Democrat. Guys, realize how crazy that is. And
that's not to say that what they're pointing
at is always false.
But it's a really obvious tactic that I
keep seeing.
That's funny.
It's
for the podcast, you'll look on the show,
you'll see it. It's a little image.
But
same point,
Chief chief nerd says president Trump to halt
funding for gated function research. I made this
point briefly on a couple different shows.
The point is for me, 1,
pretty sure they changed the definition, the name
to EPPP research.
Now I don't obviously, we all knew that
was a manipulation. Fauci and the rest was
so transparent.
But, technically,
that's what it's on like, from a legal
sense, that's what it's listed as. Right? So
if you write us a a an executive
order that says this is gain of function,
Does that apply?
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe they both apply. I
just think that's an interesting point. But either
way, the thing is I think stating that
we're halting gain of function, of course it's
a good thing.
But last time it happened,
I both under Trump's administration and before, Remember
this. We talked about it a lot before
COVID 19, the illusion therein,
that they pretended they stopped in 2014. They
were actually still doing it. Then they pry
it back, and they stopped it again. And
all the times you can prove it was
never stopping. Even when Trump feigned stopping the
work in Wuhan,
there were multiple other labs in China working
with US government people that they knew they
were there and he knew they were there.
They didn't stop those. So it's all a
game.
As we can now see, and that's the
main point for me. As I said, it
never ceases to amaze how easy it is
to manipulate partisan support.
You don't realize what the entire mRNA
project is, right?
So that's the point, really. The rest of
it are interesting points on the side of
it. But, guys, are we confused about what
exactly this is? So if you're gonna pretend
you're stopping gain of function but literally
using the fruit of that entire project as
the centerpiece for what you're doing, I'm pretty
sure he's not stopping it.
But that's just me.
So let's go through a couple quick points.
Gain of function research.
Under Wikipedia
it's medical research that genetically alters an organism
in a way that may enhance the biological
functions of gene products.
Okay. Well, right there connects, obviously, to the
the manipulation of the spike protein. Well, there's
a lot of different ways you could talk
about it. But it simply says, this research
is intended to reveal targets to better predict
emerging infectious diseases
and to develop vaccines and therapeutics.
But even then, you could say, well, but
they didn't apply here. Okay. Great. Well, let's
see. Here's Ralph there's what Ralph Barrick had
to say.
Abraham?
Actually, I'll grab this since we are showing
him.
Oh, was it under,
oh, it was it was this guy. That's
right.
Both these are disc
you guys see that? Like, it does I
hate even to have to point these things
out. I there's something strange on these platforms,
I'm telling you.
Go. There we go.
So, here he is. US funded research on
coronavirus induced myocarditis.
They literally tested how to make myocarditis
in rabbits through a coronavirus.
I mean, think about how obviously on the
nose that is. It's ridiculous. On top of
that oh, this is the other one.
See if that one finally goes.
This one was just about how they then
took that research and tried to make it
aerosolized and self spreading in the caves in
China. Now you could argue they made it
all up. My point is this is what
they claimed they were doing from the nineties
all the way till today. It's pretty crazy.
So my point is, here he is, an
MIT
Technology Review article, we never created a super
virus. It says, the work has helped and
specifically gain a function. The work has helped
in the development of mRNA coronavirus vaccines and
the first approved COVID drug.
Okay.
I'm of the mind that this is literally
dual use technology, guys. Literally.
Right here. MRA platform is dangerous dual use
technology. I covered it here. I covered this
article. Dual use. New aerosolized mRNA delivering nanoparticles
can or they can eliminate. That's a that's
an that's a step further on this path.
My point is I'm of the mind that
what we're staring at with the MRA platform
in general, whether cancer or anything else, is
literally this conversation. It's gain of function. It
is a bioepidemic.
But even if you wanna say that's not
technically accurate, I disagree.
I would still point out the reality that
what we're looking at are the fruits of
this research. So it's just the same point.
So and the game of saying we ban
it because you wrote out an executive order,
which only applies to executive branch so it
doesn't even technically make sense,
is a game, in my opinion.
At the very least, guys, you could, we
can cheer on that he wrote down stop
and gain a function that we know is
still happening all over the world through US
funding,
and then recognize the shot he's giving people
that is killing them, and recognize that maybe
that's just a way to get you to
ignore what just happened.
This is crazy to me how much is
obvious in all of this.
Make sure I got these in here.
All these shows have all the source material,
all every single source, everything we mentioned, and
it's all provable.
This one was just about the platform itself.
Right? So as they're using the mRNA technology,
well, that's the platform that is literally driving
myocarditis according to this peer reviewed study. It's
all sourced in there for you.
Again, or dual use technology.
In this case, also overlapping with DARPA. Like,
that's the bigger point we wanna make it
I'll continue into making, is that DARPA is
a central part in all this. It just
shows you that there's a government connection
that's not just some,
you know, new direction for saving people from
cancer. Like, this is an ongoing, as Whitney's
covered a lot, this this the public private
dynamic that has been driving everything.
From, like, what she points out with total
information awareness into Palantir. It's the same thing
we're seeing today, I think.
And that's the point about the x AI
overlap with Elon Musk.
Right? Or the overlapping through Palantir and Anduril
with OpenAI. Like, these people are on the
same path.
They they they give you these it's the
same I point out with pretending republicans are
all fighting with democrats.
They say these things, and then you can
prove
how they're meeting at the same places or
they're having conversations about Ukraine deals or, you
know, whatever it is.
It's true. Maybe you could pretend like they're
just being mature to get the job done.
Well, at the very least, your point is
that they're fighting constantly and they're secretly trying
to kill each other and then it's just
the proof is every single day, they're showing
you that it's all about keeping you in
check as long as you keep pointing at
your neighbor. So this is about DARPA and
rolling these things out through what gives you
the illusion of somebody that's on your side,
the pied piper of technology or techn technocracy.
And as Richard Growe points out, overlapping DARPA
back to the COVID shot that we're talking
about the same thing, never forget, DARPA Awards
Moderna Therapeutics a grant for $25,000,000 to develop
messenger RNA therapeutics,
October 2, 2013.
He says it's the 404 on their site
now, but don't worry. We've got it saved
on the archive. Thank you, Richard, for keeping
that.
It's obvious, this stuff, guys. They've been working
on this a very long time. Don't forget
Bob Langer is the cofounder of Moderna. Bob
Langer,
as Whitney called it, the coronavirus common denominator,
has direct ties to Charles Lieber. And these
both they both overlap with the technology we're
talking about today, the internal biosurveillance. And I
think this is all what it's about.
Read these and check the source material, guys,
and you'll blow your mind if you're honest
enough to actually look into it.
And as, Courtney pointed out,
just as I've been saying, precision medicine goes
back to Obama, but it's now going to
be launched in full force under MAHA.
Now, I honestly think this goes back a
while before Obama. But either way, the point
is that right now, it is clearly being
rolled out under the guise of make America
healthy again. And I think what it should
show you is it's not unique to a
partisan side, guys. It's your government doing this
to you. Here's a document from Obama's White
House archives discussing the biodiesel convergence under the
guise of precision medicine.
Now what was,
trying to think of who was
let's see.
Let's see what the let's see. Yeah. So
right so it's interesting.
This document,
as you can see
right here or it's in here, actually. Let
me grab this real quick.
2002,
which is George Bush.
Here it is. Right there.
And this is the same you can see
just the black and white version of it
you're sharing right there.
And so, in 2002 that was George Bush.
So is it's a this whole thing is
a non partisan reality. And all it's about
and her and I were she, Courtney and
I are just talking about this at length.
And she does some she has some crate
and crazy research on, like, the there there's
some really alarming elements to this. Check out
the pirate stream about the this dark level
of this behind the scenes of people that
are tapped into the Trump administration that had
this weird,
you know, like like, they are gonna become
the godly like, they are, like, superseding humanity.
And we all that that's technocracy. That's transhumanism.
Converging technologies for improving human performance.
This is where we're going. This is what
they're doing. And don't for you know you
know who else had a very similar
mindset that that they're trying to push forward
right now, but we're not connecting the dots
because we wanna make it about something else
even though Trump just spoke at Davos for
World Economic Forum? Technically, virtually, but nonetheless,
Klaus Schwab. What's the first industrial revolution
will lead to is a fusion
of our physical,
our digital,
and
our biological
identities.
The difference of this forced,
industrial revolution is it doesn't change what you
are doing. It changes you if you take
a genetic editing. Right. Just as an example,
it's you who are changed. Yeah. And, of
course, this has a big impact on your
identity.
Who does that remind you of?
This is basically what Elon Musk has been
saying about merging with machines.
Funny how it's just different when he says
the same thing because he doesn't have a
Bond villain accent. I'm I wonder whether that's
the whole point of that. Like, this is
how these things work. Rolling out Klaus Schwab
villain, so you go, no. And then Elon
comes out and gives you the libertarian version,
even though it's not even remotely that, and
people take the bait.
Now here's an interesting point. Evan loves Worf,
I'm not familiar with, but it seems clear
he's a,
you know, I guess I'm probably I I
don't wanna assume, but based on the engagement,
it seems to be, again, negative Trump, negative
Elon, probably one side or the other, partisanship.
Either way, the point is he says, I
defy any single Trump supporter, that's kinda what
I get from that, to explain why this
vile decision is good in any single way.
Now I get the sense he's saying it
because he believes the NIH and the direction
is the good thing and they're fighting the
you know, that's I don't agree with that.
But this is interesting in this in the
larger context.
It says, Trump has ordered the National Institute
of Health to cancel their review panels on
cancer research.
Now this is fascinating because think about this.
In a broad sense, I don't think the
NIH does. It doesn't mean that a body
in that in that realm couldn't potentially be
used for good. The way these things are
working today, whether the CDC, the FDA, guys,
we have to acknowledge these things are broken.
Well, maybe even potentially beyond being fixed and
that's why you know, but but that gives
them the opportunity to reimagine them. Right? We
don't want that. My point, though, is that
I think we all see what the NIH
just did.
So is this a good thing?
Or is it the self fulfill is this
a problem reaction solution?
Right? Just like with Klaus Schwab, going, we're
gonna stop this, but wait a minute. Now
he's rolling out a cancer mRNA drug? Okay.
So if the whole point is these are
people that are reviewing cancer research,
does that mean there's now who's gonna review
it? The people that they paid who? Like,
that's crazy to me that we're in a
world now where, yes, I agree with the
bad side of it, but at the same
time, you're also still rolling out mRNA technology.
So it's
it's bad and badder or worse and worse
and worse. It's it's the same dynamic. It's
lesser of evils
in a world scenario. This is everything, guys.
They're constantly doing this to you. How about
we want none of it? How about we
just don't want any of their garbage? Not
theirs Trump's version's a little bit less bad.
That seems to be the best we get
in this broken dynamic. And this person says,
you lost. We don't need to explain anything.
See, that's what they get. People that are
so warped by their belief that this right
right first left that this guy's pointing something
out. But, yes, from a point that makes
him feel like he's on the other side,
and that's how it works,
and you go, we won. Just, oh, just
cope.
It's like, you can't even take a breath
to think about whether or not that might
not be in your best interest, but we
win, so shut up.
We we are being dominated by children right
now, guys.
Juvenile games are leading our political dynamic, and
it's scary.
Speaking of that,
censorship is very, very constant right now, and
I wanted to point that out in the
context of people that are trying to expose
these things but are being manipulated on the
free speech platform. But I thought this was
funny. And this is the kind of thing
that go like I said earlier about the
I I didn't even show we'll show it
in a second. You know, the meme that
says,
you know,
I I think these people are playing a
bomb like, a cartoonishly obvious role in what's
happening.
But because they post a meme that says
they don't like it, then we go, we
knew it. They're on our side because the
meme,
that seems to be as easy as it
is this it's a lot too for a
lot of people. For example, this one says,
rabbit hole just posted this, which I agree
with.
How do you tell who's lie telling the
truth? I mean, it's not universal, but it
it a good logic point. The ones trying
to silence other people are the ones lying,
or the ones that usually seem to be
lying.
Right? That's a fair point to make. Elon
Musk goes, exactly.
And I say, exactly.
Which some people seem to think I'm agreeing
with him. It's like, come on, guys. Show
some discernment. The point is, I agree with
the point, and I'm making fun of what
he's doing. Obviously, this guy is exactly who
that meme is talking about. Now I don't
know what I don't think rabbit hole thinks
that, but that's crazy to me. So all
you have to do is go, yeah. The
thing that you said. And we go, yeah.
He's saving free speech. Even though he's literally
censoring people right now.
And, 7 c's,
who by the way is, from iconic,
says, I'll just leave this here. And it's
the it's the article about account suspensions on
x have tripled since Musk took over. Guys,
this is easily proven metric.
But we don't wanna talk about that because
it you know? What I wanted to show
you is not just this. Notice how, first
of all, there's no see no visible comments
down below,
but it says to.
Okay.
Yeah. Maybe that may. Who knows? Okay. Well,
let's look at mine. Oh, there's 4 comments.
Oh, but there's none.
Weird. Now, what I'm noticing is this happens
we all we've all seen this. But right
now, what I'm noticing more than ever is
when people try to engage with him in
ways that make him look stupid.
I find that really interesting. So there's no
4 comments. Right? What about this one?
Same same tweet. Here's Ryan Grim. He's got
a pretty large account. It's,
391,000.
And he says, didn't you go after a
bunch of right wing accounts that fought you
on h one b stuff? Yeah. And he
censored a lot of in a very, very,
very, again, cartoonishly obvious way, and then was
like, pedophiles in Europe and Muslims, and everybody
was some of them ignored it all. Most
of them did not, though, and it got
really embarrassing for him. But notice this.
Oh, wait. I only see 3. It says
52 comments. 52.
Let's refresh.
I see now I see 2, 1 under
the show button.
Oh, now there's only 1. Look.
52 comments. 53 now. I mean, guys, how
do you explain that?
That is suppression.
I'm willing to bet you if you had
the direct link to the comment, you could
probably see it, but this is how it
works. This is like I was showing you
the other day where,
Caitlin Johnstone's me
video wasn't in her media. Even though because
it was showing Elon Musk. That's my opinion.
But how many of these consistently can happen
before we start recognizing that there's these aren't
just glitches.
This is suppression of content.
That's crazy to me. It's very obvious. And
you could do this a la a 1,000
different ways around our content. Of course, you
look at his meme.
Oh, well, there you go. All you got
all the of course, you get the comments
now.
And you may it's not about, like, complaining,
guys. This is about suppressing the flow of
information.
Now this is another example.
Derek shared his article for TLEV,
the Stargate 1.
No. On a side interesting point. And I
just wanna show you what the conversation went
into. This guy says, I'm I'm I'm with
Elon and Mike Adams on this one. Decentralized
AI is the only safe path. And I
just was like, well, my god. If you
think what they're doing is decentralized, then I
have a bridge to sell you. It is
as centralized as it gets. I mean, guys,
it is I it's like pretending that any
of these things are libertarian. It it's just,
ridiculous to me. Just because they say these
words, it does not mean you're decentralized. This
is as centralized as I've ever seen something.
But my point is, and if you disagree,
please tell me why, he says, you, you
need to hear what Mike Adams had to
say about it. Now I have a lot
of criticism around all that circle because it's
the same thing. The same info wars overlap.
I've seen them all push things that I
can prove to you are wrong, that I
later went on to see like, I think
I can prove that they knew they were
wrong. But it's my opinion. Check it all
for yourself. The point
is, he said you need to check out
what he's saying. And I said, okay. Well,
give me something to look at, and I'll
and I'll I will. Which I will.
So my point, whether it's him or not,
I will always talk because that's I care
about the truth. Whoever it comes from. But
what's interesting is he goes, please check your
DMs.
X is actively blocking my responses.
Look at that guy. This stuff is constant
for me. And he goes, I'm having to
create get creative to get this info to
you. He literally had to type this out
with a me a screenshot
because it wouldn't let him do it. It's,
like, cannot seem to get past the censors
on Twitter. All I can say is look
up help ranger, and I and I know.
I'll I'll I'll look at my DMs. It's
probably there. But, guys, that's crazy. He's not
even able to respond, which I was just
showing you. That's why the comments aren't showing
up. Content is being suppressed.
Here's doctor Anastasia Maria Lupus, which I think
is a very clear example.
She has 1,400,000
followers.
A lot.
Twitter is destroying accounts and refuses to give
us an explanation or transparency about the censorship.
People have asked for my 3 month stats.
Here it is. On December 30th, he got
upset with her on the h one b
conversation.
Look at this.
That's crazy.
And look, guys, the point is whether or
not like, the reality is you have 1,400,000
followers. Whether or not, like, you have your
blue check or not, the point is these
people are subscribing to you so that they
see your content. And in I I make
this point every time. You should get a
general statistic, like, a percentage. That's how these
things work. If you've got x many followers,
you generally get about this many engagement. Now
it fluctuates, but it's a general percentage. They
could tell you what it is. I'm guaranteed
they know, except when they manipulate it. So
the point is that she goes from this
to nothing, basically, and are not getting the
engage she's not getting the engagement that she'd
expect.
And I think that's direct and obvious censorship.
And it says, I just realized Elon Musk
is even removing retweets and likes. Right before
I went to bed, 1,000, now it's a
780.
Now you guys can decide for yourself. I
think it's pretty obvious this is happening. Everyone,
including Republicans, have been calling this out.
And this person says, I'm getting constant errors
in attempting to like or retweet this post.
See? Other people are backing it up. This
has been happening a lot lately. Either this
bug, which I don't think it is, or
this looks like spam added or it says
or,
this looks like spam or add to your
phone. Oh, it says right here, sorry. This
post should've been deleted.
They just act like it's not there, even
though it is.
Are we really gonna pretend that all these
different glitches happen right in a row just
around her post? It's obvious these are being
applied to make it look like an accident.
Or a glow. Oh, it's deleted. Oh, spam.
Oh, problem. No. You're just trying to suppress
content. That's my opinion, but I think it's
quite obvious. It says, it's interesting. Did you
update the post? I got the same I
got that that post had been deleted message
when I tried to like it. But went
into your timeline, and there it was. And
she goes, nope. Didn't do anything after I
posted it.
But this is I think this is important
with where we are right now.
Now PDT points out in a different a
different angle of this, Wikipedia is being attacked,
you might have seen, by Elon Musk, and
they were calling this out. Why? Because they
were claiming that they
altered Wikipedia to pretend Israel killed everybody in
October 7th. Yeah. Because of the facts, you
mean? You mean the Hannibal directive that was
ordered that the Israeli government admitted? That the
media in Israel openly broke down with facts
source material? I mean, guys, these people are
so compromised.
Think about how crazy this is. To like,
and and we're the ones being pushed back
on like we're somehow manipulating or that we're
lying or we're racist as they're openly ignoring
the facts and fighting for agenda and then
pretending that somehow racists are manipulating Wikipedia. Yeah.
You're actually right. You know how long Israel's
been doing that on Wikipedia? But the point
is
saying that Israel's media confessed to dozens of
times, they did, guys. Israel killed settlers on
October 7th to prevent hostage taking. That's what
the reality is. That's what PBT is saying.
But if you look at when they're using
the Harratz articles to prove this,
I and it says there are interviews and
survivors. I mean, you guys know all this.
You watch this show. But I think it's
interesting to see how many people are trying
to make it out. And here's Elon. Wow.
It's not by accident. And in fact, he's
already followed up and made a point about
this on his own account.
So on that note, it's simply to highlight
that they're aggressively trying to dictate and and
and manipulate even Wikipedia for the interest of
a foreign government that's committing a genocide. Saeed
Mohammed Marandi points out that Twitter has been
repeatedly locking him out of his account,
forcing him to delete tweets criticizing the collective
west for the gods of holocaust. So this
is the kind of stuff you don't see.
They just go, well, you have to delete
that tweet or you can't come back on.
And he can't come back on. It's like,
does it, so he has no the point
is, he's simply going to the West just
doing x, y, and z. Israel's committing a
genocide, and they're forcing him to delete them.
This is constant.
This is publicly discussed as they work with
the ADL that Yacarino and Elon Musk have
been transparent about. But yet we're pretending he's
saving free speech.
It's embarrassing
and dishonest.
Brad Cohen points out, and I think this
one should really reg resonate, especially right now,
Because of this is not just about Israel.
I've been saying this how long, well before
October 7th. Since Musk took over, they have
still been censoring around medical freedom.
Now, this is not this is that's this
is the next point. This one's important for
this study.
Brad Cohen says this is a bombshell study.
They looked at the electronic medical records of
every 9 year old in the Florida's in
Florida's Medicaid program,
over 40,000 kids, and found, can you possibly
guess,
the correlation of vaccines with neurodevelopment disorders. This
is not the first time, peer reviewed and
otherwise, that it found the exact same outcome,
which is why you'll never see the CDC
or any of them do a vax versus
some vax study. Simple.
Vaxxed kids had a 6.81%
higher rate of learning disorders, 5.19
times higher rate of brain damage, 5 3.52
times higher rate of ep epilepsy,
2.7 times rate higher of autism.
Brian Hook,
formerly the CDC, has it I I got
to see him personally break this stuff down
in Nashville. It was just,
unreal.
Slide after slide after slide of his own
research showing that kids who got injections were
roundly,
more sickly in every way. And and and
from earaches and just everything you could imagine.
You generally around well visits. Children that get
these injections have far, far, far more inter
cage basically going to the doctor for different
things in their first so many years of
their life. But many of them serious.
But it goes, anyone who still claims there's
no link between autism and vaccines is ignorant
or dishonest. I agree. I've been making that
claim for a long time because the facts
are obvious. Goes back to the doc the
Vax documentary before.
It's still got it's still weird. Even in
certain circles that they're talking about this, that's
to pretend like it was a conspiracy documentary
because that was the air about it back
then.
Have you not opened your mind to those
things with where we are today? Look at
the data. That was Brian Hook. That was
all of them. That was Del Big Tree.
We've talked about it.
And this is citing the study. All the
source material's here. But here's what's interesting.
Oh, look. A a a Twitter fact check.
Guess what it says? Now I'm not saying
just because the community note says this, this
is Twitter doing that. But I wanna be
clear about the this is what has been
continuing to happen,
that this kind of content has been suppressed,
sidelined,
and in many cases, doctors have still been
censored. And I've already talked about this. But
it says, unrepresentative
observational study in a publication not listed in
major academic databases or Google Scholar. It uses
a number of health care visits that included
vaccinations as a proxy for vaccination status. Actual
reputable publications have found no link.
BS.
So here's my crazy thing. I guarantee you
there are
100 of doctors that are on this platform
that are co that are right now in
this community note circle that are challenging this.
I'm willing to bet you anything that this
does not change. 3,100,000
views. That is a factually incorrect statement. Maybe
those links you're showing don't find a link,
but there are countless
high level studies that have found obvious. I
mean, even the CDC and the mainstream media
were forced to acknowledge one that showed a
connection. That was the closest they made a
point about. The link is obvious in my
opinion. But here's the point that I wanna
just not only is this being suppressed in
this platform, but the information has been roundly
shown for a long time. Brian Hook was
one of them. Here is IPAC. James Lineswyler.
1 this is his this is on his
own peer reviewed platform that is very clear.
That's a vaxx versus on vaxx study. It's
the same thing.
Look at it for yourself. I don't think
I need to convince many people. What's crazy
to me is most people left and right
right now seem to be somewhat aware of
this, but yet this information is still being
suppressed in this platform. And here's a here's
a better example.
Guess what Grok said. And where do you
think Grok's getting the information from? Even be
the phrase says the mRNA propaganda is so
deeply entrenched, even GROC 2 is spreading it.
Oh, you think that's just by accident? No.
It's because that's what they're trying to convince
people of. But see, people like this are
so immersed, in my opinion, in the
MAGA Trump, Elon Musk sphere that they can't
see past it, I think. Maybe I'm wrong.
The point here is that Grok is clearly
feeding from the narratives that they're giving information
for. This is his artificial intelligence program.
So if we're gonna believe that Trump and
them are fighting, well, they're not though. They're
both publicly supportive of it. And that's why.
But he asked, has there ever been a
successful mRNA vaccine? And he goes, yes. There's
been many.
He lists off Pfizer and Moderna. Oh, those
are successful?
I mean, it's just embarrassingly obvious. These things
are kill they're murdering people. And Trump and
Elon and his own AI continue to tell
you that they're saving lives.
Same point. And she says AI is just
as biased as those delivering it, hence why
it's so dangerous. When someone like Larry Ellison
says he'll be use he'll use it to
keep citizens on their best behavior, he means
we must submit to their version of reality
or else because AI will be on the
will be the final say. I agree.
Now on a couple quick notes on censorship
in case you wanna see it, just before
I got started, even even Facebook is censoring
on look at this. Dangerous organizations and individuals.
They just look. They just knocked off a
whole bunch of these cut things. They they
wanted this claim I was, I guess, sharing
dangerous organizations.
It these are just cutouts.
Look at what the story is.
It was the show literally titled Israel falsely
claims Gaza famine is a hoax.
It's
the most verif look. First of all, they're
claiming it's a hoax. Funny how these platforms
tell you you're not allowed to challenge large
historic events, and then they literally challenge a
famine that's ongoing. But on top of that,
that they're openly starving people, and they've admitted
this now. But Facebook doesn't care because I
thought, wasn't Meta supposed to stop the fact
check? I guess not.
We're all guys, we're being played. It's so
obvious what's happening right now. I just hope
we're willing
to stand back and see the bigger picture
outside of a partisan field. Now, speaking of
the people that are in his administration, I
think it's important that we engage
with the obvious.
The obvious influence is coming from Israel that
I think is guiding the whole damn thing.
Now APAC tracker wanted to highlight a bigger
picture for somebody very specific, Donald Trump.
Their latest analysis uncovered over $230,000,000
in spending by pro Israel interest groups be
benefiting Donald Trump.
Marion Adelson's
specific pack,
pouring $215,000,000
out of the 230 total he's showing right
there
from Israel. If you don't think that influences
the outcome, and the links are all here
for you to check out for yourself,
then I don't know what to tell you.
That's how this works. That's what lobbying is.
And they are directly influencing the outcome of
the presidency.
This APAC tracker is just showing another one,
Don Bacon. Now what's funny about this,
this person simply going, at the start of
each session, we swear our DC staff in,
knowing our ultimate you know, just some of
them posts, whatever.
And APAC tracker just goes, Don Bacon is
bribed by APAC to put Israel
first. Okay. Here's here's what's funny to me.
APAC is a lobbying group. Their job is
to give money to politicians to influence what
they do. Now you can mince word you
can quibble about bribe. Right?
But so what did he he
let's just even say bribe is what he
disagrees with.
So you're saying APAC bribed politicians to put
Israel first.
So so far, we're talking about a government,
a lobbying group, and a politician taking money.
Seems pretty straightforward, right?
And he goes, antisemitism is the new punk
rock. Or this Lindsey Graham fangirl says that.
Antisemitism?
Okay. Where did Jews even come into the
conversation? Oh, I get it. Because you wanna
go wink wink, he hates Jews because he's
calling out your funding from a foreign government?
Like, at one point in time, this was
hard to talk about. But right now, it's
almost embarrassing how lazy these arguments have become.
And then he follows up by going, Well,
here's Lindsey Graham. $1,000,000 from APAC.
And he goes, You guys are indeed antisemitic.
So it's anti semitic to point out that
he took money from a lobbying group. Why?
Like, it's almost like they're proving their own
point, that the only way you could make
this argument is to pretend that anything is
real is attack on Jewish people, but that's
not what's happening.
I just think it's hilarious that these people
have imploded. And now what's happening is they're
demonstrating their willingness
to absolutely lie for a foreign government committing
genocide. And day by day, every single one
of them from representative Don Bacon to Graham
to Trump himself are exposing themselves as blindly
bought off by a foreign government. And all
you can do is pretend that we're secretly
racist for saying that, then you've lost.
I guarantee there are racists in the crowd
in saying that. The reality is it's fundamental.
You're watching bribery
through foreign lobbying groups. In fact, the very
lobbying group that was supposed to be shut
down from JFK that ultimately got renamed after
he was killed.
It's not hard to recognize what's going on
here, guys, but it's crazy how lazy this
is.
It's just you're paid to say that. This
is crazy. But here is another example. This
one is just worth watching. If you haven't
seen Stefanik I mean, I've been calling her
out since she was, like, trembling as she
lied about antisemitism in the congress. Right? Where
she literally was lying about the woman being
stabbed in the eye with the flag. This
woman is is
I I think we can prove knowingly lying
for Israel.
Knowingly, you can dispute, but lying for Israel.
That's transparent to me. I guess you could
argue she's being deceived. The point is that
people like this cannot be seen as America
first. I don't know how in the world
we can make sense of anything of like,
what she's doing right here
is,
I think, transparent.
And even the person asking the questions is
basically going, yes, yes, yes, we all agree
Israel, good, and whatever. But and still pushing.
And she I I think
I think she exposed herself. Max says, Israeli
warlord Mary Madison groomed a Catholic lady, and
you could dispute whether she's Catholic. I mean,
quite frankly, I think as even plenty of
priests are saying today that you can't be
a zi Zionism is its own thing. Zionism
is not Judaism, Zionism is not Christianity. So
if you're pretending to be a Jews, a
Zionist Jew, or a Zionist Christian, you're just
a Zionist. That's what I would argue. But
you guys can all decide. My point is
there are Jewish Orthodox groups making that point.
There are Christian groups making that point. I
think they're right. I think that's the crux
of the whole point.
But she he says a Catholic lady to
be spokeswoman for for con for Conus settlers
within the US government and this is the
result.
Stefanik, just a it was a very simple
question.
I just asking you if you agree with
the statement that in order to achieve long
term peace and stability
in the Middle East,
that we have to secure the human rights
and rights of self determination
for both Israelis and Palestinians.
Very simple. And even the way very well
framed, in fact.
To make her tell you that we or
a sidestep that we that human rights for
the people you pretend you're saving from Hamas
don't matter.
And if you can't see the way she's
afraid to say that and what that shows
you, the funding that's making her desperately not
wanting to say that,
then I don't know what else to show
you. Is that that's a yes or no.
I support human rights for all, and I
think it's a disgrace that Hamas and Hezbollah
have stripped human rights of the Palestinian people.
They have not. And we need to ensure
that we are standing up for human rights,
and Israel is standing up for human rights.
They are not. It is a beacon of
human rights They are not. In the region.
Nope. We agree with that. I I asked
you in my office also
about whether Palestinians have the right of self
determination.
My understanding was you said yes. You have
a different answer today. That was not the
direct question that we discussed.
Now she's oh, yeah. So in private, you're
willing to say that, but now you're on
now now your Israeli funders are watching and
no. No. No. It's that's not what we
said. I didn't say that. Well, wait a
minute. You just made the point that that's
if you're openly pushing back on whether they
have self determination,
that answers the question.
I mean, I just it's just it's embarrassing
how obvious this is. Right now, you've got
America Firsters out there who are screaming that
these people are fighting for America First while
they're actively fighting for a foreign country on
the record.
I don't know. What what kind of cultish
mentality we're watching right now? I said the
pallet You said yes. You have a different
answer today?
That was not the direct question that we
discussed. I said the Palestinian people the Palestinians
have the right of self determination. I believe
the Palestinian people deserve so much better than
the failures
that they've had. Do you agree on that?
Is a pretty simple question. And I believe
I I take it. Peace in the region.
Of course, they deserve human rights. So Wow.
I wanna ensure that number 1, we bring
the hostages home. I wanna all of us.
Representative Stefanik, let me just ask you. Yeah.
That that that's shut up. Shut up. Stop.
Stop. We know what you're doing. Stop.
It's and he's even going, we agree. Like,
it's just it's the impatience for people like
this. That shows me that there are people
like that, you know, I guess, it's hard
to tell. I argue most of these people
are probably compromising in one way or another,
whether Israel or not. That's my opinion about
politics. But the point is that I get
the sense that people like this are, you
know, broadly supporting of Israel, but maybe not
as, like, directly compromised or blackmailed to someone
like Stefanik. Now this is hypothetical.
The way the engagement goes. He's like, yes.
Yes. We all agree Israel. Good. Stop. Like,
but, nonetheless, she just it's just relentless. I
I think this is very, very clear. We
bring the hostages home. I want all of
us. Representative Stefanik, let me just ask you.
I have 30 seconds left.
I'm rarely surprised by answers in my office,
but I did ask you whether you subscribe
to the views of,
finance minister Smotrich.
Of who? I'm sorry. Finance. This is Israeli
finance minister Smotrich.
I mean,
of all the things that happened in this
conversation, that right there showed me more than
anything that she is desperately trying to lie.
Are you really gonna pretend that she doesn't
know what Smotrich is? Now let's be clear.
She wasn't misunderstand misunderstanding.
She pretended she didn't know what Smotrich who
he was. Why? Because he is a radical
maniac that even Israelis call out.
But she works for these people. That's my
opinion. And and the former national security,
minister Ben Gavir, who believe that,
Israel has a biblical right
Here it comes. To the entire West Bank.
And in that conversation, you told me that,
yes, you shared that view. Is that your
view today? Yes.
Wow.
Unequivocally. Yes. Right? Absolutely. A biblical right. Now
whether you believe that or not, or anything
biblical, that's not what we're dealing with in
politics and facts on the ground.
The idea that you could argue that there's
a biblical right to anything in the context
of kinetic warfare is
alarming, to say it lightly.
But that's head that's Pete Hegseth. That's the
vast majority of Trump's administration, guys. These people
truly believe
in this prophetic Zionist outcome that is anti
human, that is anti Christian.
It's it's anti Jewish. I mean, it's terrifying
to me.
I think when it comes to this very
difficult issue, if the president is going to
succeed
at bringing peace and stability
to the Middle East, we're gonna have to
look at the UN Security Council resolutions.
Not just the ones on Lebanon which we
should enforce, but other UN Security Council resolutions.
And it's gonna be very difficult to achieve
that
if you continue to hold
the view that you just expressed,
which is a view that was not held
by the,
founders of the state of Israel.
I I secular Zionists. I disagree with that.
Religious Zionists. Thank you, mister chairman. Well, I
mean, it's an interesting point, actually. My mindset
is that these people have always been playing
the idea. Like, I think they're bastardizing Judaism.
And But yet, there has been people through
this movement that have kinda bought in their
own BS.
So it's a fair point to argue, and
I think it's factually correct, that Herzl was
a was a atheist.
He wrote in his own journals about very
anti Semitic things, if you wanna call it
that today. Point being that some anti semitic
is a manipulation. Who semites really are is
an important conversation. Nonetheless,
what he's saying though is that, arguably, that's
not even what they thought. But I argue
that that was what they were trying to
pretend they thought all the way back then,
if that makes sense. Nonetheless,
the point is in this case,
she's saying they have a biblical right to
this location
that is fundamentally
like, that is counterintuitive
to everything they pretend they're trying to do,
which is some kind of outcome, some 2
state solution. What she wants is for them
to be no Palestine, for them to, basically,
take over more than just Palestine.
But
Syria and Egypt and Jordan, this is the
Greater Israel Project, and this is what this
all sends back to. It's transparently obvious.
People like Stefanik know this, but pretend they
don't.
So Mark Levin writes, cut Cutter buys politicians.
Levin being a fantac an obvious supporter of
the Zionist Israeli direction and trying to gaslight
her on the genocide.
But Cutter buys politicians. Right? Well, it's an
unfair it's an unfair point. But somebody goes,
Cutter buys politicians and highlights all the different
politicians that APAC is literally buying off for
Israel. But that's not the point I wanna
make. Now what I think is funny is
he's trying to go, you know, this, look
over there. Like, this is why these things
are coming out right now. And it goes
back to Bob Mendez who was caught for
basically being bribed through Egypt.
But what about Qatar?
What is Qatar? Right? So if Cutter's bribing
like, let's just pretend that Mark Levinson said
it, so it has to be true. Right?
Is that how we pretend?
So, Qatar buys politicians. Right? Well, what is
Qatar? Well, here's here. The audacity
and, chutzpah of what Netanyahu said about Qatar
is astounding. For 6 years, he encouraged Qatar
to fund the Gaza government, Hamas. Not one
payment since 2007 was made without Israeli consent
and coordination.
It says when Qatar was reconsidering its policy
in 2018,
Netanyahu implored,
even dispatching the then head of Masad, as
we've shown you many times, to convince them
to carry on with funding Hamas. Well, you
know this. That's the point where Mas'ad went
to the chief went to Qatar to convince
them to continue funding them. Well, this is
the first point. Harrat's openly telling you that
basically they've become a financial middleman for Israel.
Here
is, oh, wait. This was oh, wait. Hold
on.
I must have gotten this mixed up.
Shoot.
How did I miss that?
I'm probably gonna find in a second. God,
I'm just gonna keep going forward. I'll come
back to it. I don't wanna mix it
all up. There is an another tab I
was gonna show you that overlaps with this.
And yeah. Damn it. I can't I'll I'll
it'll pop up as we go through it.
But basically, I'm gonna continue to highlight for
you that Qatar essentially plays the middle man
role for Israel. And and there's a there's
a lot of conversation around this about obvious
this role is as a central vassal state.
Right? And so the point would be, if
you wanna argue Qatar's buying politicians, well,
you could argue that's Israel using Qatar to
buy politicians, which is how this works.
Same with Egypt, guys, as we're gonna highlight
with the funding that was stopped for international
except for Egypt and Israel. And Egypt is
part of what Israel that's that's for Israel.
We'll come back to that. I guess I
just forgot to organize it properly. But on
the same point, same general conversation,
Hegseth being one of these radical prophetic Zionists,
who just got confirmed, by the way, which
is what I told you. Like, are we
so what about all the people that like,
yes, they owe 5050. It was super close.
Yeah. Maybe. I just I think we're being
played. I think it's obvious that they all
blindly support Israel, and so clearly, that is
what they wanted to happen.
But I think it's important that they make
it seem like there's some kind of division,
or I'm wrong. I mean, you guys can
say it for yourselves. But the point is,
Jones says, heck Seth, narrow and over time
confirmation victory. And he highlights this going, look
at McConnell. He's a what do you call
him? A a Chinese communist
plant, and he goes over and high fives
the democrats because that shows he's compromised. Right?
Even though they're all working together. As long
as they keep you focusing on the other
side like the boogeyman, you're never gonna solve
any problems. But he sure as hell knows
that these days, and he's fighting for the
other side.
Not left or right, in my opinion. My
point though is that this is important. The
highlight is to go look at Hegseth. He
just got in. That's why we have to
keep fighting for all of them. This is
a Zionist.
This is a globalist
technocrat dynamic when he pretends he's fighting and
you guys are going, we need to keep
fighting for all the rest of them to
get caught. That's the problem.
It's transparent right now. These are the people
rolling out the AI structure. These are the
people talking about mRNA cancer shots. These are
the people promoting genocide in Gaza. These are
the people supporting genocide in Lebanon. These are
the people supporting genocide in Syria. You catching
on? But, yeah, good. Let's keep fighting to
make sure Trump's people get in because Trump,
Republican, Team sport politics, that's all that matters
right now to these people. And I simply
said, you still think there's 2 parties fighting?
No. There's one party in the United States,
and it's a Zionist party. And no. That
doesn't singularly mean Jewish people. As there are
more Christian Zionists today than Jewish Zionists. Stop
being so racist.
Ian Carroll points out something around Hegseth.
He simply point he shows Mike Nellis saying,
Lloyd Austin confirmed 93 to 2. Mark Esper,
90 to 8. All different people in the
same position. The point is, Hegseth, 5050.
The most unqualified nominee. I mean, it is
a stupid point. Like, we pretend because these
people in congress say yes or no, that
means qualified or not. These are all morons
as far as I can tell. Uneducated,
uninformed people that are simply being led by
lobbyists. I know I'm super jaded when it
comes to government. But I think,
hopefully, we're starting to recognize that it does
seem to be that ridiculous. But he says,
this is why America has woken up to
the trust of the experts.
But see, this is I have a this
is where this time this maybe it's again,
he himself tends to point out he's new
in this. Maybe that you know, you guys
decide for yourself. People are very critical. There's
rightly so a lot of ways to criticize
people in this position. And I've I've I've
my suspicions too. But I'm just simply pointing
out that maybe it's just that
he hasn't seen beyond this. My point is,
this is kind of like the first step.
Like, you know, he's talking about the minefield.
People wake up from this kinda stuff and
they get caught up in queuing on. Right?
The first mine, they step in. They're like,
we we figured it all out. And it
was all a big trap. Well, in this
case, my point is, well, okay. COVID 19
taught us that we can't just trust the
expert. That's absurd. We should've never
questioned everything while considering all possibilities. That's just
logic.
So, yes, we should consider that maybe the
CDC is wrong and just don't even know
it, or maybe they're lying to us. Nonetheless,
it's questioner. Don't blindly trust because that eventually
and always will be taken advantage of by
power structures. But so when we realize that,
that doesn't become ignore all the experts or
if they do so, then the opposite is
true, which is kinda what keeps happening here.
And not just right here in this post,
but in a lot of the partisan side
of things. I think it's kind of the
secondary manipulation.
But so the point is correct. We did
wake up to this. But he goes, because
in a system that is bought and paid
for by the experts are just the gatekeepers
of that corrupt status quo.
Mike here thinks receiving more votes from the
deep state indicates qualification for the job. In
fact, the opposite is what the American people
voted for.
Now right in the last sentence, I'm like,
we're in agreement, but the idea is somehow
it's the opposite. Like, I just it's not
what he's saying is not wrong, but I
worry that this opens people's minds to the
idea that if they say one thing, we
need to believe the opposite. Or if they
tell you he's not con you see what
I'm saying? I'm of the mind that this
number means nothing,
but I still agree that Mike Hegseth is
a dangerous maniac that is not in the
interest of America.
That's simply why I said, yes. They're all
part of the problem. Agreed. But as usual,
using a false binary, driving support to the
new structure by design and the prophetic religious
Zionist deep state technocrat, Hegseth, and all the
rest of this administration. I know he sees
this because he just got a huge point
where
he ratioed Elon Musk about exactly this kind
of topic.
Here is HEGSAT for you. As Vanessa Billie
points out and I've already played this for
you, by the way. This is, absurd, she
says. Americanism and Zionism
are two hands of global terrorism.
I get that. I mean, I think that
is the easiest thing to prove in the
conversation right now. Either way, here's what he
has to say about this. Now for those
that blindly believe Zionism is, you know, whatever
they tell you it is, this probably won't
have any much much water wait for you.
But I think a lot of conservatives
are intelligent enough to recognize the lies around
all of this, at the very least to
see what it's doing in Gaza.
It's just impossible not to see. And here
he is telling you that that is synonymous
with Americanism.
One that wants to take the stage
and talk about dual loyalty
is dead wrong.
What this organ is And by the way,
in a funny way, goes on to basically
make the case for dual loyalism.
Represents. What Western civilization
represents today
is under in understanding
that Zionism
and Americanism
are the front lines of western civilization and
freedom in our world today.
Okay. So then, what are you saying? That
they're they're hand in hand? Well, I mean,
it's just another way of saying it similar.
Like, the point is always whether it's Israel,
China, Russia, the idea, and every one of
the other ones seem to matter, is that
if anybody is is in a position where
they might have more loyalty to a different
lo nation
because of dual citizenship,
well, that has to matter, doesn't it? Of
course it does. If somebody's a China like,
the idea that we have people like brat
Brian Mast, who are literally,
I mean, provably, a part of the idea
if he wore his uniform into the office,
doesn't that concern anybody? Would we allow a
member of the Chinese military or even the
British military to be part of our government?
No. Because it's just basically accepted. Except Israel
is okay though.
I mean, it's just lunacy how obvious this
all is. And what he's telling you is
that they're the same thing. They're way hand
in hand. No. They're not, guys. Zionism is
a political organization that is terroristic. It's a
colonial
project that has been publicly highlighted for what
it is. It has taken territory. It has
executed people. It has carried out genocide, and
we're supposed to pretend it's the same thing?
In a lot of ways, you could make
a lot of connection to the American government.
Yes. But I do not believe our societies
are even remotely synonymous. Look at what this
society is promoting.
And that's not also the majority. Or I
shouldn't say all of them. Yeah. I do
think it's the majority.
Israel has a lot of people in that
country that aren't that calling us out. But
it's also pretty easy to prove that the
majority people are in line with the way
they've driven them to think.
That Palestinians are monsters.
Or that people like, oh, I mean, horrifying
things. Oh, I'll I'll point out a clip
in a second, of the information around the
culture of rape that exists in this society.
Haratz has written about it for years.
But we're not supposed to talk about it
because apparently racist, and he pointed out what
the Israeli media is saying about its own
culture.
It's crazy. So if he wants you to
think these two things are the same, why
do you think that is?
And and what better time for that relationship?
From the scrapping of the terrible Iran deal
to the embassy move, the recognition of Jerusalem.
Illegal.
Actions that are illegal. As the capital of
the Jewish state, the recognition of the Golan
Heights.
Illegal.
Right. But it's okay. We're just gonna take
Greenland and do all the it's okay. Because
that was the same they're the same thing.
Right? He's telling you. We're all imperial projects.
We'll take what we want. We'll do what
we want. Power through right now, he's proudly
talking about the peace through strength dynamic. That
means war, guys.
It's just very basic.
Here is another example.
As Phil Guraldi points out, an over the
top Christian Zionist, HEGSETH, whose body is covered
with Christian crosses tattoos,
denies the Palestine or even the Palestinians actually
exist. He calls the West Bank Samaria and
Judea. He is only a so called he
wait. He is also, excuse me, a so
called third temple activist
who believes that the Al Aqsa mosque and
other Muslim holy sites, which is what it
is, it's a mosque right now, on the
temple mount in Jerusalem should be torn down
to rebuild the Judean temple allegedly destroyed by
the Romans in the 2nd century. And it's
supposed to be the 3rd temple.
Right? The idea that this is supposed to
be when the second come what what's funny
about this is these are all prophetic moments
that are supposed to lead to, like, the
end times and, like, the second coming. But
isn't that contradicting with the idea that God
came back and allowed you to take this
territory which is only supposed to happen in
the second coming? Which by the way is
exactly what orthodox Jews that are calling this
out are saying. These are Zionist political entities
that have hijacked this religion.
It's just so easy to prove it if
you just basically think about the facts. The
bottom line, he believes in prophetic Zionism which
is a fundamentally dangerous thing. Is it that
is a terrorist organization
based on what they've been doing, based on
a lot of different experts and academics who
have made this case over and over. I
mean, how long we've been covering this? And
I guess the only argument becomes that you
must be racist for pointing it out. Well,
again, here's an Israeli Jew telling you what
Zionism is.
Zionism is racism.
Israel cannot be both.
Israel is either
a racist Jewish state
or it's a democratic state for everybody, and
that's what I would like Israel to be.
I'd like a democratic solution, one state with
equal rights for,
all its inhabitants.
Your organization,
Human Rights Watch,
issued a report last year,
about
Israel,
and the conclusion was it is an apartheid
state.
And the 4 major
human rights groups in the last 2 years
who issued similar report
reached the same conclusion.
Israel
is an apartheid state. So
apartheid is racism.
Apartheid
is discrimination.
But
Israel is the only member
of the United Nations that I know
which is officially racist.
And I say this because of the,
July
2018
nation state law, which says
the Jews
have
a unique
unique right to serve the termination
in Israel.
Unique means exclusive. Yes. It means Arabs have
no right to serve the termination.
Mhmm. It means even if Arabs became
a majority,
they would still have no right to serve
the termination. Mhmm. So most certainly,
Zionism
is a,
is a racist ideology and it is largely
responsible
for the Anakba
that has unfolded throughout the last century and
continues today.
And that's really one of the main reasons
that law was passed. They recognized
the shifting dynamics, and they're worried about more
Palestinians being forced into the state of Palestine
that they call Israel.
And so, they passed a law that would,
at least for their own momentary feeling, allow
them to feel that they would never lose
that. That's racism, guys. That's an apartheid. Apartheid
is I mean, arguably with today, people are
arguing what this is today is something worse
than apartheid. Historically, apartheid's always been considered, like,
the most the worst form of racism.
This is what they believe in, guys.
Now here's Joe Wilson.
He says, congratulations,
Pete Hegseth, on becoming
being confirmed in the POTUS choice for secretary
of defense. As a senior member of the
HAS, what is it? The Armed Services GOP
Republicans. I look forward to working closely with
Mike Rogers
and the new secretary to ensure peace through
strength. That's what they all keep talking about.
How long are we making this point? They
love to make this claim. Historically, all that
means is they go to war. And they
continue to react to more they cause warfare
because that benefits the merchants of death, it
benefits the agenda of their colonial project, of
their occupations.
But they always blame it on somebody else.
That's I mean, look around the world, guys.
These are the most
belligerently violent people, and they pretend they're helping
and saving and curing. It's disgusting.
But here is Joe Wilson. I believe I
will see a free Iran before the end
of Trump's presidency. You know why he's saying
that? Because these people are all funded through
AIPAC, and the argument is they want Iran
taken out. If we haven't paid attention by
now, how long they've been pushing this agenda
and how long they've been called out for
it, even by people in this government. And
here we go. Now we're gonna see a
free Iran is free right now, guys. Iran
is what most people in Iran like, if
you listen to the conversation and what Robert
has highlighted,
like in this country, there's a huge faction
of people in that country that do not
agree with the current government, just like in
the United States right now. Right? If you're
gonna make that argument, it has to apply
equally. The point is that they, by and
large, even if they don't like the current
government, do not want US coming in mixing
up. They this is a of course, polls
and the rest of it. Hopefully, you'll do
due diligence and decide for yourself. Based on
my investigation and people like Robert and their
work and their it's obvious that the majority
of people do not want more US intervention.
Because they ra they their own history shows
what that caused.
During the shah, it was good for the
oligarchy supported by the United States and bad
for everybody else. They loved to frame it
differently.
So here he is pushing free Iran because
what? They're gonna jam back in the MEK?
Isn't that what they all support?
That's not better. Ask Syria how it's working
out.
Free. Here's Al Qaeda to rule you.
I just don't know why anybody other than
liars aren't seeing through this right now.
And here he is again.
Saying, free Iraq from Iran.
Oh, good. So now we're gonna free Iraq
wait a minute. Iraq?
Do you mean the country you're currently occupying,
and you need to free it from Iran?
What?
Guys, these people are belligerent, and it's all
from obvious. Like, this is,
what was the article again from the place
from? Oh, it's right there. The Paul Palmetto
politics.
Joe Wilson coasting to reelection. Pro Israel donors
still giving him 1,000. Gee. Even though he
was winning, they were still giving him more
money.
Sounds like a bonus.
I said, right. Oh, so he says, remember,
save free Iraq from Iran. That's all he
tweeted. Over 2 almost 2,000,000 views.
This guy
has
not even a 100000 followers. Right? So over
here, you got people with millions of followers
that get barely any engagement. Here, you got
a guy with a 100000 that gets 2,000,000
engaged. Why? Because it's being raised up, obviously.
Why do you think that is? Because Israel,
I think, is aggressively influencing this platform.
But I simply said, right,
because Iran is illegally occupying Iraqi territory?
It's Iran that the Iraqi government has asked
to leave numerous times? Oh no, that would
be the US government. And who is it
again driving US policy towards war with Iran
for only its interest? Oh, that's right, it's
Israel.
Lazy.
Think about being an American politician right now,
and so transparently doing the bidding of Israel
with what's going on in the world.
I make this point every time. I don't
know how you make sense of that. Either
they are just that compromised or that profiteering,
or they're something else. But this is wild
to me.
Save them from a wrong guys, you are
currently occupying this territory.
That's just incredible. But peace through strength. Right?
That's what they want you to believe.
Interestingly enough, you saw some of these kind
of positives they wanna frame it as, which
I think is interesting. So the the removing
security details, it is such a fake win.
You realize, guys, that in many cases these
people this generally tends to happen. Like, the
idea you none of these people are required.
Like, outside of, like, former presidents and and,
like, executive staff, I or, like, Brent, like,
v VP and so on, I don't think
they tend to get long term support for
not longer being in a position.
But you tell me if I'm wrong. My
point is that Bolton and Fauci got their
details removed.
Now realize, the game is that Fauci bad
guy. He is a bad guy. He's a
horrible, incri- criminal of Jersey in prison, in
my opinion. But Trump just rolled out an
mRNA cancer shot. So what are we talking
about? Right? Is it all just about tokens
and pretending you took down the bad guy
when Trump's doing the same thing that we
all call him a criminal for?
That seems pretty stupid. My point is to
pretend that removing his detail,
it's about it shows you secretly this is
who's going after Fauci. Maybe.
How about you put him in prison though
instead of just removing his detail? Or with
Bolton making it sound like you guys aren't
actually exactly on the same page. That's what
I think it's about. It's about giving you
a fake win to make you think, see,
that means he's not the same even though
he's doing the same thing. Or in this
case, John Bolton urges Israel to strike Iran
immediately.
Yeah. This this guy is such a maniac.
My point is, that's what Trump's administration's doing
too.
So remove his detail because Bolton's not with
the yeah. But they're all doing the same
thing for the same entity, guys.
Now,
here's another example of another person involved with
Trump's administration.
You've already seen this one. It's gotten a
lot of attention, especially from conservatives that are
rightly calling this out. Now, I would argue
that just being connected to Soros is not
I mean, like anything, just being connected to
anybody. It doesn't prove that you are something,
one thing or another. It's a good indication
though, usually. But typically, what do we see?
Right? You can have some third person connection
to a Soros group, and all of a
sudden the entire Democrat group they're with is
all compromised.
That's the kind of lazy research we get,
even though it matters. Because Soros is one
major element of what we've been seeing, you
know, now the Soros group in general.
My point though is that this,
was it,
Bessett?
Besent or I'm sorry, it's Besent. Right? Besent?
Scott Besent? Gets called out for this and
weirdly gets kind of get a pass.
Because, well, you know, it's a group you
work with and it's not that big of
a deal. Which is just funny how people
will make a mole a big deal out
of one thing and ignore it for something
else, all because of their partisanship.
But to me, it's not just about the
Soros connection. But that's always a good point
to make. The hypocrisy of it all. But
this is from January 16th. Trump's billionaire, another
billionaire course, because it's totally not an oligarchy,
just like it wasn't under Biden. Yes. It
was for all of them.
Treasury picks stresses, and it so it's for
the treasury. Stresses importance of tax cuts for
billionaires.
Rolling Stone. No. That's true, but of course,
it's you could frame it as,
you know, a partisan angle.
Ascent.
Trump has and this is from forward.
Trump has vilified George Soros,
but he just picked the Jewish billionaire's protege
for treasury secretary.
So
vilifying Soros
is words.
This is an action. Okay. Maybe it's not
the same thing. My point is always is
saying you wanna go again or journalists and
the Democrats and their woke agenda is one
thing. But then when you do it differently,
or in this case, let's say, fighting Fauci
and the bad guy, then rolling out your
mRNA. Like, the point is words are one
thing. Actions are what matter. In this case,
I find it interesting that so few wanna
call this out.
Here he is on Times of Israel. Trump
names hedge fund manager Scott Bessent as his
nominee and simply says here, Bessent, who is
from South Carolina, attended Yale University, and served
as chief investment officer for Soros Fund Management,
the macroeconomic
investment firm of billionaire George Soros. In 2015,
he even raised capital including $2,000,000,000
from Soros to start his own hedge fund.
I don't know how you don't see that
all the way to this day. If he
was the main backing for your hedge fund,
that's not some background thing to me. But
you guys can decide for yourself.
Shadow of Ezra clearly thought it's important. He
says Scott Dissent, who will lead the treasury
department, previously worked at George Soros' fund management
from 91 to 2000. And then again, as
chief investment officer from 2011 to 2015 and
after which he took
$2,000,000,000 for his his own company. It says
during this period, he made a significant bet
against the British pound contributing to Soros' famous
breaking of the Bank of England and earning
1,000,000,000 up for the firm. The London office
was led by Peter Soros, George Soros' nephew,
who has been named by Epstein's former butler,
Alfred Rodriguez, as having been involved in Epstein's
truck trafficking activities.
Bassett is also on the board of trustees
at the Rockefeller University alongside prominent figures in
the globalist establishment.
Funny how little engagement that gets for such,
you know, if this was about Biden, oh
my god. It'd be everywhere. The point is,
this is important. I mean, there's like 6
different examples here that are supposed to be
red flags for this very group we're talking
about. And I would argue, partisan nonsense aside,
these are worthy of consideration.
Whether it's the Epstein overlap with the supposed
list that's about to come out, is that
gonna matter for his picks? Or are those
people gonna be striked off struck off the
list before we see it?
I just think it's interesting, the blindness in
some cases.
But my point is the same. It's left
or it's not left or right. As tar
Derek wrote on to the 28th October. Election
2024.
Zionist technocrats
versus Zionist technocrats.
That's the game, guys. They stack it either
way, so they don't really care what you
think you pick.
As well as the administration after the election,
the new Trump administration, and the technocratic Zionist
coup of the United States.
I this I'm convinced this is what's happening.
As Courtney points out,
nothing more to see. Move along.
Michael's sharing this. Peter Thiel's Palantir Tech. Guess
what, guys? Had a massive presence at the
World Economic Forum this year.
No big deal. Right?
Wow. Trump spoke virtually. He was actually sticking
it to no. They really weren't, guys. They
love to make it sound like, you know,
Malay and him were sticking it to their
woke agenda. You think they care about that?
You think truly that's what their objective is
as they roll out their technocratic structure? Guys,
these are the games they're playing. Now, yes,
there are people that are invested in this
stuff.
But if if you think all it's about
is pushing back on the genders,
I mean, you've taken the bait.
God, this is I mean, what's crazy to
me is Palantir.
Which is, like, a central part of this
growing it is what's happening. It's like like
I said, the tick in bed in the
Trump administration.
And is a central player at the World
Economic Forum at that both Hamaulae and Trump
speak at.
But he says, but, I mean, it isn't
anything to worry about. Right?
Obviously, it should be. And obviously, it would
be if it was anybody else.
And, as we know, Trump spoke
at Davos, at the World Economic Forum. And,
yes, he had things to say that you
would argue pushed back on the left agenda,
but the question is if you think the
World Economic Forum, what the the global agenda
you do you if that's what you think
it really is. Maybe you do. I would
argue it's a bit shortsighted with everything we
see rolling out.
Now David Icke points out, somebody that I've
been calling out for a very long time
that now is he blocked because of that
very point, that I think is important to
highlight because these are spectacularly
stupid people that are constantly sharing
deliberately false information.
David Icke saying this is this TPD Shawn,
the people's voice, who by the way, remember
it was like blacklist news or whatever that
got exposed as fake so they brought it
down, brought this and it's the same sign
that's brought up with a new name.
David Icke says, this is the guy who
told you Trump was going to arrest Bill
Gates and send him to Guantanamo and endless
other complete crap year after year. This was
before Trump's 3 hour dinner with Gates at
Mar a Lago and Trump's $500,000,000,000
AI announcement that includes mRNA fake vaccines that
have been promoted by Gates. People taking this
bloke seriously is one of the great confirmations
that humans will believe anything.
Trump, Kate, Schwab, Musk are all part of
the club. The rest is theater and gullibility.
I mean, it's it's sad. Like, I I'll
show you. So this just says, WEF declares
US election null and void. No. They didn't.
Predicts black swan event will reset human no.
That didn't none of this happened.
Like, it's I mean, this is what he
does, it's like this amalgamation of random things
that you can see online that they just
dump on the they claim they said all
these things. And then he does some monologue
around it that answers no questions and gives
you no information.
It's just like the, Matt Wallace. The same
thing they do. Oh, behind the sheet, pay
me here and you can see the secret
information that gives you no more information.
He says the World Economic Forum has officially
kicked off in Davos and the world global
elite, Klaus Schwab, are wasting no time making
their agenda crystal clear. According to Schwab, the
recent US election results are proof America can
no longer govern itself.
His solution? Force the United States to bow
to authority. Guys, he's just literally making things
up.
And what's crazy about it is what he
tends to do is lie in the direction
of something we all kinda see building. That
way when you go, he's lying, they go,
you're fighting for the Democrats. It's like, it's
not I'm not saying that it's not it's
it's frustrating, and it's obvious.
So here is what he he does every
time.
Fakes these things.
You wanna go find this tweet? You won't
find it because it doesn't exist. Now he
pretends he's just using it for for gravitas
trying to make a point. No. You're lying.
Just like when you quote fake things like
that, blacks wanna vet. That's that's not real,
guys. And guess what? You'll also find no
source material because these people are ridiculous.
But you guys mostly know that. I just
I just thought it was interesting. David Icke
decided to call him out. And this is
important because right now, it's overlapping with the
World Economic Forum. That Trump and Malay and
and Palantir are all a part of.
Don't you think that should be the story?
Here's another example. And this is an old
video, by the way. But it's important to
highlight because this was real, and it got
pushed back on as fake even at the
time back then.
Says, do you believe Trump? It says, Klaus
Schwab is a gentleman and doing a great
job.
Well, you could argue he just now he
knows different, but he doesn't because he still
supports everything he's doing and continues to support
the new shots and the mRNA direction.
Right?
But what's interesting to me is this is
somebody engaging with this as if they think
it's new
and defending it.
Continue to show you that they will defend
anything.
Oh, he he, you know, and he just
bought the World Economic Forum because he's gonna
make it better. It's like, okay. I'm just
making that up. I'm saying, in no matter
what seems to happen, as even told you,
he could shoot someone in Times Square and
then also support him, They just go, this
is why it makes sense.
So she's simply highlighting, and this is an
older video. This is from the last, this
is from this video is posted a year
old, which just simply shows you that this
is older than right now. This is not
from a year ago. It's from the last
world world economic forum, I think. I mean,
maybe it was about a year ago. I
think it was I think it was more
than that. Any case, it's not from the
current WEF 25 is my point. There's the
video to check out, how they walk out.
I'll show it to you right now.
But says he's doing a good job. He's
a gentleman.
And this person says, this is I Anne
Vandersteel says,
I think he's highlighting him as he already
pulled out of the WHO.
Paris Accord, and standing by the exit of
the UN and NATO. Like, again, all these
things that have been floated.
I still move the mind that we haven't
even seen the real flush of what the
WHO overlap is going to look like and
whether or not there seems like there might
still be more funding going through Gates in
other ways,
which I think is real.
But
this is saying, you know, he did this
already. And he's just trying to highlight him.
And that's that's a typical kinda game. Well,
he's he's pretending to get along with him
so he can highlight him, so we can
expose him.
Interesting. Even though this is not new. So
you're defending something as because even though it's
not new. But it says his position on
CBDCs neutered the central bankers. I don't think
that's the case. I think they're playing you
with the idea that you thought it was
gonna be central bank digital currency, and we're
clearly gonna see a private s stablecoin dynamic
that's the it's far worse. Katherine Austin Fitts
and plenty of us in the IMA have
been talking about it for a very long
time. Mark Goodwin and Whitney have been highlighting
the Tether central stablecoin aspect of it. I
think their work is very important on that.
But they neutered them because that's way excite
except to the extent required by law, comma,
everything else. I already pointed this out. If
your executive order starts by except for the
extent required by law, we ban all these
things, well, that doesn't really mean you ban
them. That's my opinion.
But it says
it's either the greatest show on Earth or
the scariest sci fi movie ever I I
you get the point I'm making.
This is not new. But they see it
and go, well, here's why he did it.
Well, you're defending something that didn't even happen.
So what that shows you is they're willing
to defend anything, And this didn't even turn
out to be new.
Fairy telling. But here's the actual clip. So
remember, this is from before. Oh, we've loved
it. And we think it's a great country,
a beautiful country. And we have had a,
tremendous success.
Yeah. Great success. And this gentleman, as you
know, he's, he's done a great job. Thank
you very much. Thank you. One more question.
Done a very great job.
I think it matters, even back then. And
people will do try to push back on
it. Now, here's the point I was just
making. True seeker made a good point here.
Donald Trump's announcement investment, those was on the
7th of this year, of January rather.
An investment to build large new data centers
with a group called DAMAC.
The chairman of that group has ties to
World Economic Forum and Bill Gates. So it's
interesting to me. I think this goes beyond
that. Now, this was announced before the annou
the big announcement of the AI structures. Right?
I think it's more than just the AI
overlap. I think we're dealing with some kind
of the the overlap of all of this,
the mRNA shots, the artificial intelligence.
But here's the tweets he shared.
The the information. So this is just the
breaking down from inside a paper. I just
found the article itself.
Trump announces $20,000,000,000
on the 7th January of this year.
Foreign investment to build new US data centers.
It's interesting. Right? So right after this, they
announced 500,000,000,000
to build I AI infrastructure in the country.
This is 20,000,000,000 for foreign investment to a
new US data centers. And they're u it's
with you emirate billionaire from the UAE, Hussein
Sadhwani.
The d m a DAMAC Properties.
So interesting timing on that. Right? But just
right no. Right there though, you're what you're
just large amount of funding to out to
to a and by the way, which I
do find interesting. So this is this from
I think this is Trump's personal investment.
Because, I mean, this my whole thing with
the ethics things that nobody seems to care
about, we're well past that now. I told
you. The point is that there's so many
weird discrepancies
right now. How was Trump making all these
deals before he was even inaugurated? Is this
something he made in regard to the the
net the infrastructure deal well before he was
even in position? How does that make sense?
Or is it his personal investment? And if
that's the case, is it not a conflict
of interest?
It just seems strange. I'm I I went
through this, and now I'm remembering it. It
just didn't seem like there's any it just
seems to say that he invested. But is
that it says elect. It says president-elect,
which would suggest from a position of authority.
That's not the point I'm making. I've just
been thinking of that now. I find that
interesting. I'm sure this will come out more.
I'll also remember what this is and where
this comes from.
Here's the point that's interesting. Here's the guy
he's investing with. Here is a this is
Hussein Sejwani. It says, here's to making every
connection matter.
While at the World Economic Forum, memories of
an exceptional journey, an insightful encounter, Bill Gates,
Microsoft founder. Yeah. I mean, it doesn't prove
anything. He just met him, took a picture
of him. Right? But I think it's interesting.
Especially when you deep dig further into this
person and you begin to see more. So
ro the worry is all I'm
highlighting. Why they're pulling out of the WHO,
whatever else we're talking about, that all we're
seeing is more money that gets funneled in
different directions that go back to the same
infrastructure.
That's what I worry about. And if are
are we still trying to pretend that Gates
isn't working with Trump right now? I think
it's pretty clear.
Here is Visitor Grad 24.
And if we haven't recognized by now, guys,
this is an Israeli propaganda platform
that Musk seems to blindly support no matter
whether they get caught lying or not. It
says, Hussein Shetani from the UAE, the CEO
of DMA c DAMAC
Properties and DMAAC Group, announced his $20,000,000,000 investment
with the United States. This moment has been
4 years in the making.
I just think it's important. So this is
it this shows you Israel has an interest
in highlighting this. I think that's very clear.
David Miller says, Hussein's uncle, the one we're
just pointing to, Hussein Sejuani,
pictured here, that's the guy we're discussing, is
an Emirati oligarch and founder of DAMAC Properties.
The family has been at the center of
the UAE's Zionization drive. Don't take it from
me. Here's their own spiel.
At the as the UAE and Israel take
great strides together towards a strengthened, unified approach
to trade exchange and promising business partnerships, the
UAE looks forward to welcoming Israeli homeowners and
investors into the real estate circle. So what
you could argue, that's just an extension of
their colonial project. But it says, well, uncle
Hussein crashes the genocide genocide checks cashes them,
excuse me. Young Hussein who's Hussein spends his
days tweeting desperately in favor of the Zionism
of the UAE, Mohammed bin Zayed and Elon
Musk.
See where this goes? The Emirati logic is
clear. This century belongs to Jewish supremacists.
So being a vassal of the state of
Israel provides protection and a chance to make
money in return for one's dignity and principles,
neither of which Mohammed bin Zayed has ever
been troubled by. Now, of course, this is
now deleted.
The point is that you can find very
clear connections that this entity is basically another
overlapping interest for Israel's outcome. And so and
that is tied to Bill Gates and the
larger agenda.
I think those things matter. Now I would
never argue this is absolute verification of what
might happen. But I don't I think anybody
objective would say these things matter. And now
as we see this moving around with the
funding,
this very well may be just a new
way to get the funding in the same
place.
I think that's important.
Now on this conversation,
the
new world order overlapped all of it. Right?
We've already talked about this for the show
on the, 8th January. As Israel's globalist ambitions
become clear, Team Sports Republicans endorse North American
Union.
That's what keeps happening. The the the pretending
that we're talking about globalists over here while
ignoring that globalism is being rolled out right
in front of you, and that you're supporting
it and lying about it. It's everywhere. This
is the North American Union. It's a classic
part of all this that's being ignored.
And this is that meme I was talking
about. Right? So he puts out a meme
that says it basically for the podcast. It
shows a a small tree
And it show and you've seen it. It
shows a noose tied to the small tree
and round a guy's neck and the guy's
watering the tree. And it shows globalism of
the tree and western nations with the guy.
So the point is, we're basically
creating our own circumstances. Right? We're watering globalism,
which will eventually hang western nations. That's what
he's trying to say. My point is oh,
he says, globalism is civilizational
suicide.
I said, clearly, since Elon shared this meme,
he's totally not part of the obvious globalist
technocratic agenda that he's currently a central part
of. Case closed.
I mean, it some people, it's as simple
as that. As he's walking out the exact
things that we call that we're we don't
ignore it because, well, he clearly is fighting
it. Then what we we get the Elon
version of globalism. The Elon version of AI.
That's my opinion anyway. I think it's pretty
clear it's happening.
This one's the same kinda thing.
Alex Jones shares, learn how the globalist deep
state's massive targeting of Elon Musk is designed
to derail Trump's American golden age agenda.
Okay.
I said, right. So don't fight back, guys.
Even if it looks like exactly what you're
supposed to fight. Because that'll derail Trump's super
secret master plan. Can't have that happen. That's
the plan.
Mister Sausage had a point about the Canada
overlap and he simply said, Trump this is
a prediction. Trump is going to use tariffs
to crash Canada's economy, after which they will
relinquish their sovereignty as they will purportedly have
no other choice.
Canadian leaders will pretend to oppose, it's just
an act. They are all in on it.
The great reset, very poorly disguised. Interesting thought.
Worth considering.
My point would be this, generally, the same
kind of idea, that what we're seeing is
more organized than we're being shown. And that
they need you to think there's more pushing
back and dynamic, when in reality, we're watching
the globalist technocratic agenda rolled out.
I've never in my life first of all,
I never ever thought it would be this
obvious. I think that's what's crazy to me.
But I never thought we would even see
it like this. Whether obvious or not. Like,
didn't I just think it's wild what's happening
and how many people are ignoring it.
So here is the Greenland overlap, which is
clearly still happening. Another example of what was
claimed to be a troll that's now literally
rolling out.
Now this is a clip from I'll just
play it first. This is, Trump
speaking about how Danish officials are freaked out.
I I wonder I wonder why. Like, we
told you this would lead to some potential
real conflict.
Greenland
Greenland is a wonderful place. We need it
for international security,
and I'm sure that Denmark will
come along.
Wow. International security,
Okay. So what if they don't want that?
Too bad. They'll come along. Like, you know,
it's costing them a lot of money to
maintain it, to keep it. Yeah. They cost
money to run any country.
That's a dumb thing to say.
The people of Greenland are not happy with
Denmark.
As As far as I could tell, that's
not true. I get debates with people, but
look into it for yourself. I can't see
any provable example that there's some mass movement
from Denmark to move away, to to basically
allow the US government to conquer their territory.
I mean, it just of so many reasons
doesn't make any sense. Whether it's the overlapping
of societies, the difference of whether it's their
health care or there I mean, there's there's
structural differences that are very clear that I
think most people in these countries
like, whether we're talking about Canada or Denmark
or Pan or any of them.
It just doesn't make sense. Like, the overlap
doesn't align. Now it's not to say there's
people that might not think this is a
good move.
But from my research, I don't get any
indication that these countries want this or the
peoples want this.
Mostly, I get the opposite, that it's like
this is spectacularly this is crazy. This is
imperialism.
No. I think they're happy with us. We
had representatives my son had representatives
went up there 2 weeks ago,
and they like us.
So
but Greenland is necessary, not for us. It's
necessary for international
security.
Oh, okay.
Right. But we'll take it though for us
and mine it for its resources, for international
security. You have Russian boats all over the
place. You have China boats.
Okay. So the illusion of international security, but
your fight against
you need you know, fight for US preeminence.
Right? We can't let them come over and
take it. We have to take it. Classic
US imperialism lie. It's all over the place,
warships,
and they can't maintain it.
Yeah. Okay. Right. Because China the China Russia
can't do it, so we're gonna do it.
God. This is the dumbest, laziest argument that
we but it it works
because people have been trained to look at
it like they if they're gonna do it,
we gotta do it first. Right? Clinton couldn't
do it, so we're gonna do it.
Yeah.
This is
I just can't I'm so tired of how
dumb all this is half the time, but
we just I wonder when it will draw
dawn on the MAGA that they have put
a narcissistic
megalomaniac
dictator in the office who is serving his
globalist cult masters like a good little boy,
David Icke. And he says the fact that
grouping Greenland with the US is a cult
club
of Rome objective,
and grouping the US with Canada and Mexico
is the long planned North American Union that
he was exposing in the nineties is pure
coincidence, of course.
May the hijacked fake alternative media who put
Trump in the White House have mercy on
their own souls when reality dawns on what
they have done and how they have misled
the people. Frankly, I think the people that
are doing that know they're doing it and
don't care. But I think the people that
are being manipulated are the ones that do
care, which I think is the majority.
They just don't see what's happening, and they
they want the best for this country, and
they're being tricked. That's what we're trying to
do. Trying to highlight that for people.
Arnaud Petron writes this in regard to Royers
Rory
Rory Stewart saying, Trump is quite different from
almost all previous leaders since the early middle
ages. He does not have pretend
or he does not even pretend with Greenland
or Gaza or international aid to be acting
for just reasons.
The impact of this naked abuse of power
will be staggering.
Now people will love to make it about
a Democrat hating Trump. Well, it's not, guys.
Somebody like me who's nonpar like, this is
called this is the rampant lawlessness
that I've been calling out from a from
as far back as I've ever been doing
this. From from Obama to Bush to Biden
to Trump. It's the same deal. They are
ra acting like every move is making it
worse. You are then instilling in the minds
of Americans that it's okay to be belligerently
violent as long as you're powerful enough to
get away with it. That's what they're teaching
people without saying it.
Rampant lawlessness, the tone the term that I
that was coined by George Galloway as far
as I know. And I I I think
it's well, I'm sure someone said it before,
but that's where I remember it from. And
it's important to think about. Rampant lawlessness
while pretending to be fighting for the opposite.
Arnott says, at heart, the main reason so
many western elites hate Trump so much is
because he refuses to maintain the polite fiction
of moral authority that they've cultivated.
Can we please go back to pretending we
were acting for just reasons? He says he
holds up a mirror and they recoiled their
own inflection. I mean, it's a it's a
great point, actually. Because what and he's highlighting
this person from
was it,
Yeah. Doesn't matter. So it's somebody, you know,
in the UK with an influential opinion. The
point
is I think it's important to think about.
Like, this is where we talk about the
divide. Like, as Whitney's talked about the the
different divisions between even the same kind of
power structure
that there are, you know, the archaic NeoCon
elements, the new technocracy, but they're still driving
for your control.
And we'll work together when they need to.
At the end of the day,
what he does, we're there to take the
oil, is what I think is the interest
of Zionism.
Which is what his clear financial backing is
because they have an interest in destroying the
society. They have an interest in flooding it
with immigration. They have an interest with creating
the reality that we are falling apart and
they are better. That's what I mean, is
I'm I'm gonna end with a clip today
about Netanyahu saying that. I've played it for
you before. Openly saying how easy it is
to play the left versus the right to
control America.
So what I'm saying is that it's interesting
that he is doing a thing
that does cult some of the other background
that are I think still know where their
money they they still allow Israel to do
what they want, but they're not so bought
off by Zionism.
Where they go, Trump, stop being blatantly obvious
about it. And that's where you see some
of the divide.
But they're still all in line with making
sure this still goes forward. You get what
I'm saying? And so he I agree with
him. I think Trump is so masked off
about this stuff that it makes them recoil.
Not because they care, but because it that
we see who they
are. Scott Ritter says at this point in
time, either Denmark dispatches its military to seize
control of the, what is it, put off
the space space space base and forcibly evict
the US military from Greenland, citing either article
4 51 right to preemptive self defense, which
I hate that term, request an emergency security
council meeting to respond to the imminent threat
posed by the United States to its territory,
and request immediate article 4 cons consultations
with its NATO allies or its surrenders.
Let's guess which it will be.
I think he's suggesting that it will be
surrender.
That's interesting. Either way, the point we the
point he's really making here is that this
is belligerent violence. What they're doing is imperialistic.
It's authoritarian. Th this is globalism. They're conquering
territory
in real time today.
But because it's better for everybody,
that's a pretty flimsy excuse for this die
day and age, guys. It's crazy. While supporting
a genocide, I might add.
Doctor Simon Godek points this out and said,
like, he's supportive of the of the momentum,
the MAGA, the the rebel can side. But
he goes, hey, MAGA, you're you're all for,
quote, let the native Greenlanders decide whether or
not they wanna belong to the US or
Denmark. So, he says, would you apply the
same principle to native Hawaiians
and let them decide whether to seek independence
or remain part of the United States? It's
a point I've made in the past. Right?
I lived there for years.
I'll tell you right now, they do not
see themselves as part of the United States,
guys. Because frankly, they're not. It's a conquered
territory that they still maintain as a conquered
territory, and they just claim it's part of
the United States. They are not part of
the United States, and they feel that they
are not part of the United States. And
if you ask them, they wouldn't wanna be.
So on top of that, what about the
Donbas?
Or Crimea? Or even Taiwan in this context?
Because it's it's 2 different sides of the
same kinda game. My point is that they're
all being played or dis
not acknowledged by the US government.
Taiwan is this play this piece that the
US is moving around even though there's never
even been a declaration of this is not
the actual movement there. It's all about playing
against China. On the other side of it,
you got Donbas from Crimea that have roundly,
publicly, universally been shown to actually wanna join
because the evidence is so shockingly obvious. They're
primarily Russian speaking. I mean, it is I
we all gone through it.
Anybody that's still stupid enough to pretend that
these groups didn't wanna join Russia is all
for an agenda. My point is, they voted.
They had a referendum. Crimea was resoundingly clear.
They just don't wanna let it happen.
So his point is, would you allow it
here? I would argue their answer is no.
But we'll take what we want though. That's
rampant lawlessness. Streets peace through strength or strength
through strength. And it says this guy says,
I agree with that.
I believe in auto determination
and would be well, it says, I agree
with that. I believe in auto determination and
would be for Greenland declaring independence from everyone.
Well, see, that would be the point. That's
what I was saying earlier. There's not independence
if you're joining another state another
government control structure. Independence would be independence from
all of it. That's not what's actually happening
here. So they're playing it. That's my point.
The Greenlanders don't want to be conquered by
somebody else. I think that's pretty clear.
He says, definitely. Greenland has plenty of natural
resources to sell. But why would Greenlanders want
to join the US?
Do they realize they'd be stuck paying property
taxes
up to 37%
in federal income taxes no matter where they
live and funding billions for Ukraine and Israel?
Maybe this is why Trump created the external
revenue service. See how it all starts to
come together? The point is, guys, nobody wants
that. And you you think Americans don't even
realize the differences because they wanna pretend they're
all so much worse. They're not. This game
we play where we're number 1 in everything
hasn't been true for a very, very, very,
very long time.
Interesting point, though.
Arnabatran, I'm gonna go past this since we're
already well past what I wanted for this.
I wanna make sure we get to the
next page. But he's simply highlighting this interesting
overlap. That basically,
Denmark has been one of the most committed
US Basel States to enter the u the
EU and is still trying to placate everything
the US wants. The point he's making is
this is what it looks like to placate.
Eventually, they just take your shirt. And that's
what he's saying. It's like, eventually, even still,
it seems like they're just offering more. Please,
here's more. Stop. Don't do that. They don't
want this. But they're willing to give the
US more to allow it not to happen,
which is maybe the whole point.
On top of that, I'm gonna skip past
some of these in a rush, but the
point is attorney general Andrew Bailey, I think
it was Massachusetts or Missouri,
simply says we're demanding 25,000,000,000 in penalties from
harm China caused during COVID 19. Really, we're
still playing that game despite this is because
it's bubbling back up to the CIA. The
reality is the US government was a central
player in all this. All they're doing is
using this to divide and conquer. Divide in
in in this country too.
But the overarching point is about seizing ch
the land from farmland. Well, let's let's talk
about that. Like, all this imperialistic stuff, guys.
The, the point I made was, first of
all,
it it just said that demand money or
I just read. Despite the fact that the
US government is intimate in in intimately involved,
they think you just demand money or you'll
seize land
or war.
Only shows the alarmingly imperialist path the US
government is currently on. But I said, assuming
he means US farmland owned by China assets,
which he doesn't make clear, but I'm pretty
sure that's what he meant. As opposed to
Chinese territory,
are these owned by the government?
Can we prove this is the US char
the Chinese government owning this? In some cases,
I do think that's the case. The question
is, why then is that the case? And
you realize this is not unique to Biden's
administration, which is the game they like to
play, guys. So ask yourself these full questions
if you wanna dive into this.
If you think there were why were they
allowed in the 1st place? And if you
only see it as one is, the bottom
line is, guys,
this is about trying to create this dynamic
where it is about demanding something. And if
you don't appease what we're asking, if you
don't do what we need, we will go
after you.
We'll seize your assets even if we can't
even prove it's a government overlap. This is
just a Chinese, you know, businessman that owns
something. Like, we saw this during COVID 19.
I'm not saying that's the full picture. Because
realize, there's a weird overlap to this Chinese
government discussion inside this country. We've covered it.
It's not unique to just Biden's administration.
So what I think this is about is
trying to create a it's a it's a
problem reaction solution dynamic, and it's happening everywhere.
With this dynamic, it's at Mexico, Canada, Panama.
I mean, it's everywhere and all over the
Middle East.
Here's,
Sachs talking about a a China point that
I do think is relevant to play. And
I think this important point here, guys, I
think there's more coordination between a lot of
these governments than we realize. But it's important
to think about this. And this is an
objectively
it's it's it's a easily proven fact. It
doesn't mean it has it doesn't have to
mean one good or bad or the point
is, if you look at the United States
government history
of war, just war, and compare it to
any of the states they claim are their
big boogeyman of the world,
and you still think that makes sense, I
you
you could still think China's I mean, I'm
I'm terrified of what China is. And the
reality of the social credit system and the
technocracy, it's all clear.
But if we can't see that the US
government is the central player in all of
the world's woes for such a long time,
again, we're just lying to ourselves.
And my my point's always been the same,
that I think China or Russia, if let
to have the same amount of power the
US would, would probably be in the same
position. Because I think government is the real
problem. So don't take it as one versus
the other. But we need to hear what
he's saying here and realize that we're being
played even now with that very point.
How many wars has China been in in
the last 40 years?
Let me count them. That would be 0.
Not one war in 40 years. When was
the most recent war that China was in?
January 16
to February 16,
1979.
1 month
in a conflict with Vietnam,
which had to do actually with
the Vietnam having, overthrown a government in Cambodia.
Okay.
1 month.
We are not at dire risk from China.
We are China is not mass murdering its
population,
but we are gearing up in the United
States for war with China.
Why?
Well, once again, people actually wrote why. There's
a
former colleague of mine, Robert Blackwell and Ashley
Telles, in 2015,
they say that China has become so powerful
that it threatens
American primacy,
and China's rise is no longer in America's
interest. And so
you No longer
is an interesting thing to pluck out of
that. That's kinda what I'm getting at. He
doesn't he speaks very deliberately.
So that means and I think you can
prove this. People have written books about, like,
the overlap. The reality that there's an point
at which that was an interest of the
US government. Right? Or maybe even before this,
talking about the British government. Like, the reality
is clear.
Watch this mentality in the US
that it threatens
American primacy,
and China's rise is no longer in America's
interest.
And so you watch this mentality in the
US go into effect. Suddenly, because China's economically
successful,
they're not just economically successful. They're the enemy.
Right. So everything becomes
rhetoric.
So think about that. Now you can argue
that that's what every government would be like,
and I wouldn't actually get you wouldn't get
much pushback from me. But it's certainly possible
that the only reason that we see the
world we see today is because of that
mindset that's being driven through the Israeli US
dynamic.
It's worth considering. You know, the idea being
that we have to go after them because
they're gonna be more powerful. Well, in history,
things ebb and flow that way. Like and
that's the idea that and I'm sure people
I I myself can see the weaponized idea
within it all, but the idea of the
multi polar dynamic where you don't have one
central power. You have it's a constantly ebbing
and flowing dynamic of powerful entities, of governments
and and nation states.
Like, I you know, again, my mindset is
very clearly that all of that is the
problem. I'm just trying to say that with
if we're forced to live in this dynamic,
you should be able to at least consider
how obvious it is that the reason we're
still going through it like this is because
they treat every other entity that becomes like,
this is about all of it. About China,
Russia, going back as far as you wanna
look. That if they start to become too
influential,
they start to gain too much well, we
have to put them back in their place.
Using surreptitious
violent methods. And then you get mad when
they respond?
I I mean, it's just it's it's all
criminal.
And it's a perfect example of this, actually.
Michael Tracey says Cuba's designation as a state
sponsor of terrorism
being rescinded and then reinstated within a matter
of literally 6 days is a parody of
US foreign policy.
So all this shows you is it means
nothing.
But the same with the Sudan, the point
they make every time. You're either a terrorist
if you don't wanna work with Israel, or
you're not if you do.
Whether you are or not is irrelevant in
that conversation. It's just about a tool that
we and this is clear by the fact
that they work with Hayat al Sham al
Qaeda in Syria, or in general, a proxy
element of both these countries.
They're it just uses these things. It's in
it's embarrassing. And the world is starting to
see this stuff, or as for a very
long time. Rubio,
see he says, just hearing the Taliban is
holding more American hostages than has been reported.
Oh, funny how I've never heard Rubio make
a say a word about the Americans
and Palestinian Americans and British Americans that are
still trapped in Gaza. You know, that flattened
area where they're living in tents and nobody
can get out? Yeah. They don't they don't
care about them. Some of them are simply
Americans, which shouldn't matter any more or less.
They are, people of lives and families and
dreams. The point is that if you're pretending
as America first, what about the Americans that
right in the beginning NPR covered? 600 of
them were in Gaza. Some of which were
there because they married people. The point was
they never mentioned that, but they couldn't stop
talking about the Israeli Americans that were taken.
And now he seems to care about the
tal why? You mean the Taliban that you
guys have worked with, that Trump's last administration
made deals with? It's all been this, not
left or right. It's always been a game.
It's always been used. They used these groups
when they were buy it was a game
with the s Mochadin against the Saudi, the
Soviet Union.
That later becomes Al Qaeda, later becomes ISIS.
It's the same game. They are manipulating it.
So he goes, I just heard the Taliban's
holding more Americans. He said, if this true,
we will have to immediately place very big
bounties on their leaders.
Well, I mean, these guys don't even care
what they look like. These are criminals. Bounties
on their heads. Is that how this works
these days?
And guess what, guys? How much you wanna
bet this gets you back involved in Afghanistan?
Which, guess what? We never actually left. How
long have I been telling you that?
Maybe even bigger than the one we had
on Bin Laden. Oh, you mean the guy
you worked with until you didn't?
Does anybody believe these people anymore other than
blind partisans? I just don't get it. It's
lazy.
Marco Rubio Act and all that's why Gerald
Sulent says, tough guy. Go get him.
Like, it's just th these are kinda people
that got picked on in school, I think.
They're just happy to be acting like they're
super tough.
The game is,
I think they work with this entity, like
they have for a long time, and overlap
that with the whole ISIS K game, which
is a complete fake CIA Israel cut out
in my mind. Like all of it really,
but this is a specific game they play.
And so they're trying to make this big
game about them being Taliban's whole I I
I think we're being played like always.
A big bounty on their heads. Like, if
you thought they were holding Americans is is
what you do put you hire assassins to
kill them?
Is that what good guy leaders do?
It's just crazy. They just don't care. I
mean, I again, I think that's because the
interest of Israel is to make this the
reality today. On top of that, Trump says
he could send US special operators after Mexican
drug cartels.
Again, is this how this works? Aren't there
supposed to be international relations with especially your
board your people that share a border with
you? No. We're just gonna send in our
people and they can deal with it because
we're in control. Well, yeah. That's always been
the point, guys. That's how they see the
world. But then love to pretend they care
about sovereignty and rights and human. Nope. They
don't care. Not about any of it. Especially
not yours.
And this this this is just business insiders
saying it could make things worse. Yeah. Obviously.
Mexico is pretty upset about this. They don't
want any part of what they're talking about.
I think that's an excuse.
And Matt Gaetz
playing the same Rubio Trump game. Like, these
guys are clearly tapping into the same kind
of feeling, the same vibe.
So the Gustavo Perpetro,
who is the president of Colombia,
or at least to, yeah, from 2022 to
2026.
He says,
the US cannot treat Colombian migrants as criminals.
I deny the entry of American planes carrying
Colombian migrants into our territory. Now, by the
way, I think I I saw something I
was able to check before I went live,
that this might have already updated or changed.
So it's possible. If you see that, let
me know. Like, it might have already they've
already already caved, essentially. But But it says
the United States must establish a protocol for
the dignified treatment of migrants before we receive
them.
So this is what he says. Matt Gaetz,
a representative of the United States, embarrassingly enough,
what, 3,200,000
followers, says,
don't f with us on this, dude.
He says, you will you will be taking
your criminals back the easy way or the
hard way. These are supposed to be leaders
of the free world.
Not only speaking like children,
but acting like they're tough guys. That's not
what tough real people that are strong don't
talk like that. Weak men talk like that.
And he goes, this is not a fight
with America you want. We want friendly relations
with our neighbors, but friends don't leave their
own s h I t in others' homes.
God. These guys are ridiculous.
Like, are you not embarrassed, conserva I would
be embarrassed if this guy was pretending to
represent
me. Even if you agree with the stance
he's taking.
I mean, this is silly. And that's why
I think this is more about presenting a
certain feeling than anything else.
And all this is doing is creating this
dynamic that somehow we're being abused even though
you're the ones abusing everybody.
Now the border dynamic this is all creating,
whether Mexico, all of it. The immigration conversation,
let's not forget where this leads. If you
can't see all of this now with the
infrastructure and AI and biometric wall, the digital
ID, it's all coming your way.
Personalized medicine, how do you think that's gonna
work?
The say the SAVE Act, real ID and
ID 2020,
Using the 2 party illusion in the election
to usher in digital IDs.
Now this is already going forward. So the
point is whether the the whether we're able
to see that this is being thrust upon
us or not.
I'll include this again.
Truth seeker, see he says voter ID will
be the digital ID. Wake up. Now you
could disagree. It's his opinion. I think the
point is that voter ID is I mean,
what's the difference?
You can call it one thing or the
other. We're still talking. I mean, that it
will be digital, guys. Let's not forget that
digital services is just they've renamed Doge.
So now when we go Doge, it was
rolling out your voter ID. They're gonna go,
yay.
Even though it's basically your digital service is
giving you digital ID, and we're gonna go
Doge.
That's what I think, anyway.
And then on the point of immigration,
I found this interesting.
This AF post says, days in Trump's second
term, ICE has arrested fewer
illegal immigrants than early days of Trump's first
term, in 2017.
Now what I find interesting is this is
being framed as somehow like a win for
Trump.
Like, see? It's already working. And it's like,
guys, I don't think you thought this through.
Like, so this only means 1 or 2
things to me. That they're beefing up for
what this big move will be, which actually
makes sense to me. Like, I I don't
see how he doesn't follow through with something
in regard to the dip deportation.
But if you needed to get organized for
it, there there was gonna be a lull.
That's what I think is actually happening. And
what's funny is
or
he's just not going after them like he
promised. I I think it's the former. I
do. But it's funny that this is being
framed as the win as if he's already
done it. Which is kinda how this game
works because who cares? Just own it. We
won already. It's over. Didn't even happen yet.
But he says, in 2016 and 20 like,
2024, Trump promised mass deportations but was unable
to carry them out due to logistical difficulties.
I don't think we're there yet. That's that's
a little bit of a jump. I think
we're seeing things. He's declared well, the state
of emergency was supposed to be at the
border. They've already admitted it was because of
China and everything else. It's allowing them to
roll out these mass data centers. That's what
they already said. So we're being played yet
again. Conservatives are ignoring it in some cases.
But this is interesting. So all I wanna
do is point this out because right now,
it seems to be not going in the
direction as promised. But as I said, I
do think that's probably what we'll roll out.
We'll have to see how this goes forward.
But my point is how all this comes
together. That using this conversation, you are going
to see these digital dynamics thrust upon you.
This is just very weird to me. Breaking
911 says, violent gang member in ICE custody
screaming, I'm not going back to Haiti. F
Trump. It's all Biden.
I'm like,
I guess.
I just said, that feels a bit staged.
Anybody else? I find it quite interesting which
people are suddenly blindly taking this man's word.
Hypothetically
speaking, had this man yelled, Trump and Israel
did this, do you think these people would
also blindly take him at his word? I
think that's a very good point.
Right? I mean, the idea is it's the
guy you don't know yelling something,
and he because it aligns with what you
think, you go, yeah. We knew it. If
he had said Trump and Israel are the
reason I'm here,
this probably wouldn't even get talked about. Even
though I actually think it's far more re
accurate. But even if either were dishonest, my
point is the same. That you know they
probably would ignore it, which shows you it's
subjective.
I just find that to be pretty silly.
I I really did.
Here's what I think is more telling. Even
if that guy's real, because obviously, there are
violent criminals and are violent immigrant that are
illegally here. Nobody's denying that or shouldn't be.
My point is how this is being used
and presented in very clear ways. And the
fact that he goes, bitch all Biden. I
just that's so stupid. How does he know
that? I mean, come on. But the point
is, city of Newark.
And I simply said, this is sadly what
I expected. I linked to the weaponized migration
link.
Mayor Ras, Baraka's statement on ICE raids in
Newark, business establishments.
It says 2025
20 January 23. Today,
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ICE, agents raided
a local establishment in the city of Newark,
detaining
undocumented
residents
as well as citizens
without producing a warrant. Gee. Who could've seen
this coming? One of the detainees
was a US military veteran
who suffered the indignity of having the legitimacy
of his military documentation
questioned.
Probably because he was brown. They agreed that's
my opinion. But I mean, like, how that
seems like a strange thing to assume, a
white man sitting in the room just suddenly
right? It says, this egregious act is a
plain violation of the 4th Amendment of the
United States Constitution, which guarantees the right of
the people be secure in their persons, houses,
papers, and effects against unreasonable se searches and
seizures. Which, by the way, if you don't
remember by now, even applies
to illegal immigrants in some cases. Like, I've
made this place so many times. There's been
roundly precedents by the Supreme Court that have
shown that the constitution
can apply in many cases even to illegal
immigrants.
Make sure you understand that because that's been
very clear over the years. But even if
you don't agree with that, the point is
that in this case, they don't know.
They're just rounding up people
undocumented that may and including a veteran. So
they didn't know. That is, by definition, an
unreasonable search and seizure, but that's what we
knew would happen. Because that's what happens in
every time we deal with something like this.
And Trump already said stop and frisk, which
is about as unconstitutional as it gets.
It says Newark will not stand by idly
while people are being unlawfully terrorized. I'll be
holding a press conference in alliance with partners
sadly and will ready. Excuse me. I'm willing
to defend and protect civil and human rights
details to come.
Interesting.
I mean, just so you can see, this
is posted by the city of Newark.
Doesn't that I mean, I I it scares
me how little people seem to care about
this. That's wild. And that is a a
veteran. Of all people, republican should care more
than anybody. Right? And that we're told?
Look at the engagement on this, guys. It's
nothing. Like, even on this one, especially.
Oh, I'm sorry. It well, that went up
a lot since last time I looked at
it. That's crazy. Okay. Well, I'm glad it
got a lot of reach. 1,300,000
views on that.
I'm just trying to I was gonna see
if there's any change. Lot when I looked
last time, there's very little. Maybe that's why
I caught it on 23rd. The point is
that this is a problem, and it shows
that they're acting broadly with very little oversight,
guys. This is what we were worried about.
And how do you not see that that
brings in more security, more surveillance, more authoritarianism?
Like, the idea that this is a violation
of your rights everywhere and it will only
lead to the same things we're talking about.
At the article, weaponized migration and experimentation.
Tools for subversion,
division, and manufacturing consent.
I'm telling you guys, it's transparent where this
is coming from, in my opinion. Now here
is the article or the executive order from
20th,
clarifying the military's role in protecting the territorial
integrity of the United States.
So I wanna point this out again. Deploying
US military inside the United States
has I mean, there are opening the aspects
to this.
I'll just I'll just read what I highlighted
here. But, ultimately,
what's happening, at least is proposed, I believe,
is already a violation.
This is deploying, you know, the US military
inside the United States, including on the border,
is subject to legal constraints and limitations. We
talked about the policy comethatus act. Prohibits the
use of federal military personnel for domestic law
enforcement purposes. So in any case,
if you're using the military to enforce domestic
law, which is what this is like, technically,
I guess that you could argue that because
it's immigration that we're talking about something that's
not domestic. I mean, it is. It's a
game. Especially if you're dealing with something not
on the border. That's domestic law. So I
in my opinion, this is already a violation.
Now I'd say now, again, with the military
overlap. Not to say that the ICE doing
that. I'm saying the point is he's already
pointed out that will the military will be
involved, and I don't see how it couldn't
be with the size of this. It says
such as arrests, surges, and seizures, which we
just saw. However, there are exceptions
for authorities to allow military support for certain
scenarios. And what I found the most interesting,
the Insurrection Act provides the president with the
authority to deploy the military domestically for law
enforcement purposes under certain conditions, such as when
there is an insurrection or rebellion.
Okay.
Two thoughts. Certainly could be something that is
accused of the Democrats, which would be perfectly
how this tends to go. But
how much you wanna bet? Because we already
saw the Insurrection Act applied to Trump in
the January 6th dynamic, that there's some background
thing that never went away. Just a thought.
And if background
thing that never went away. Just a thought.
And if you're paying attention and not partisan,
you tend to see that this is how
it goes. But it says in the context
of a border security, the military can provide
support to civilian law enforcement, including border patrol
through activities such as surveillance, intelligence gathering, reconnaissance.
That's what I think this is really about.
And so they're gonna roll out this massive
AI power surveillance structure under the guise of
fighting the look at the timing. Look at
the timing of rolling out their AI infrastructure.
At the same time, they're claiming they're gonna
sweep out all the bad guys.
How else do you think this works?
On top of that, this is where I
think it obviously leads. And guess what? Here's
Sam Altman himself from OpenAI, who is a
central part of the Stargate dynamic, who is
telling you
about how
you need to have we need to change
the social construct, is what he said.
Champagne Josh, he simply says he is talking
about universal basic income via crypto. And guess
what? He just so happens to have something
called Worldcoin that aims to create a digital
global currency
that uses your iris scans to make sure
that they know who you are.
We've already talked about this. Derek wrote an
article about it back in May 2023 because
he was that far ahead of the story.
But here is the clip that's important to
see.
Or as I grab it.
World the the point that Derek makes about
world coin obviously is not just that it
is about a global currency. I mean, actually,
for really think about how crazy it is
to discuss global currencies in the context of
what we just saw.
It's amazing the amount of things that teams
for republicans will ignore that are everything
that are being that they were once calling
out.
It really is striking. So here here is
the clip of him talking about updating the
social contract.
You gotta be kidding me. Oh, okay. Hold
on. I had to remove one. I thought
it wasn't letting me do it.
And here it is.
I still expect, although I don't know what
and this is over a long period of
time. This is not a, like, next year
or, you know, the year after that kind
of thing. But over a long period of
time, I still expect that there will be
some change required to the social contract
given how powerful we expect this technology to
be.
I'm not a believer that there won't be
any jobs. I think we always find new
things to do. But I do think, like,
the whole structure of society itself will,
you know, be up for some degree of
debate and reconfiguration.
I mean, just think about that statement in
the light of what we're dealing with. Like,
here, I mean, just, you know, just bring
this up again.
I mean, this is quite literally what this
is I mean, these people,
Sam Altman, Larry Ellison,
and,
SoftBank.
I mean, guys, that that these are, like,
the the this is the deep state. Israel,
Oracle,
surveillance,
artificial intelligence. I mean, it's just it's striking.
And he's literally telling you, as they roll
out an AI mRNA injection
infrastructure, that we're gonna have to change the
social contract. What do you think he's talking
about?
He's talking about digital ID and social credit,
in my opinion.
And it says and it jumps 25% after
project Stargate was announced. What do you know?
And, of course, he goes, Elon Musk, you
should shine a light on this. Right? Unless,
of course, you agree with his vision of
the future.
And this is
the article he wrote in 2023.
Sam Altman. Artificial intelligence, the Bilderberg Group, and
Worldcoin.
Literally, telling you to scan your irises in
this orb.
Weirdly like the orb in the whole Saudi
Arabian overlap. Right? The point is you can
scan your irises
and they can prove that you're the only
you in the world and we'll give you
a 25 Worldcoin.
And then delete it, we swear.
That's what they say.
It's it's just about this. This is exactly
what it looks like.
And Richard Willett points out, Oracle and Ellison
already tried to force in a digital ID
after 911. That was the same thing that
happened well back, and this is 2001.
And here he is again, forcing another version
from a different angle. It's not an accident.
And this is, I'm actually gonna rush this
this is what I was gonna point out.
Clint Russell simply saying he's worried.
This whole
very he's getting very post 911
vibes from MAGA when it comes to the
Mexican drug cartels. Well, yeah. That's exactly what
we're just pointing out. Like, this is about
trying to justify in this new direction, in
my opinion. And it just goes, I hope
I'm wrong. You know, my point was I
this is exactly how the US government, all
of it, operates. If we can't see that
by now, we're choosing not to. And this
person says, simply, this is how it's gonna
work. Dumb Americans, fax passports,
Voter immigration, digital ID. Right? Getting them to
look at that as opposed to the vax
passport. Of course, we're all no vax passports,
right? But this is different. It's just it's
a sleight of hand, guys. We're being played.
Now, the last point on this segment.
Don't forget this, guys. Now this is about
the great rebranding I've talked about or the
inversion. We can frame it in a lot
of different ways.
How embarrassingly obvious it is we're talking about
this new we're like, the CIA is now
what we need.
I mean, if we've ever if we all
collectively ever, kind of gestured towards something that
we all would go, yeah, probably deep state,
it was always the CIA. And now the
very group telling us we're fighting the deep
state is far like, openly calling for the
CIA to be involved, as Trump recently did.
But Patrick Kennison says, okay. So these spooks
are now pushing the story line that it
was Al Qaeda who started the LA wildfires.
That's another CIA interview on the Sean Ryan
podcast. But I thought he was taking a
break. I guess they just I guess the
CIA decided otherwise.
They're literally trying to tell you that Al
Qaeda's implanted in this country and are starting
the LA wildfires.
Anything's possible, but the only evidence you have
are CIA elements telling you what they want
you to hear. Which get just so happens
to rationalize
every angle of everything they're trying to accomplish.
Not only the foreign policy overlap, not even
like the vanilla ISIS biological overlap, because they're
also telling you biological problems. It also rational
they this will end up being some kind
of control structure problem.
Necessitates artificial intelligence, digital ID. That's what they're
all talking about. The crip the tel technological
solution.
And by the way, yet again, I showed
you this last time, I'm just simply trying
to search for the the tweet from Trump,
from his account, that mentioned the CIA. And
what do you know? It's just not there.
Twitter wants you to believe that it's just
not there. Look.
You know it's there. I'm gonna show it
to you. I even searched for more specifically.
It starts with our country's a disaster. But
look. No
results. But what do you know? There it
is.
Our country is a disaster. I wonder why
that wouldn't pop up, guys. I wonder why
there must just be a glitch. I guess
Twitter's just having problems. Right? But just so
we can skip past the facetiousness of it
all, the CIA must get involved now before
it's too late, Trump says,
on January 2, 2025 with 69,000,000
views.
The CIA must get involved before it's too
late.
I mean, if you would've predicted this before,
nobody would've believed you. Republicans would've laughed in
your face. And now they're the ones telling
you this is what's gonna work.
It's wild.
Well, here he is talking about the fire.
As I said, playing you like a Phil.
What do you think he's trying to plant
in your mind coming from the Al Qaeda
plot file wildfire game they're playing? No. If
we've ever seen anything like it, frankly. They
say the biggest in the history of California,
I think, has anything bigger than that happened
in the whole country ever?
It looks like, I don't wanna say what
it looks like, but you know what I'm
gonna say. It looks like something hit it,
and we won't talk about what hit it,
but it is a bad, bad situation.
God.
Just like it's it almost makes me feel
bad for people.
Like, you you were, oh, he did he
he meant the thing. He's secretly telling us
you read the comments. Now, going on about
how the only ones that know what's going
on are the ones that know how to
read between the lines when Trump speaks. I
I mean, look, I would never argue I
know you're wrong because that'd be just as
stupid as you pretending you know what he's
saying right there. But the idea that you
think you can just guess at what you
think he's saying and that you're all gonna
somehow be like, that's the Qanon nonsense that
has clearly been wrong more times than I've
ever seen something be wrong and people still
continue to look at it.
But we don't know what to talk, what
we're gonna look we don't wanna mention what
we think it looks like when something
hit it. But so you will say it
though. Like, you just
I feel bad for you if you think
that this is anything other than him trying
to make you think in a very clumsy
way that he's secretly pointing at what the
CIA wants you to think is going on
for a very clear national security agenda that
will be at the expense of your privacy.
But, you know, freedom.
And the Free Thought Project makes a very
good point. How about instead of the government
deficiency, we just abolish the CIA?
And here's a little game. The 911 hijackers
were CIA. The OKC bombing was CIA. The
crack epidemic was CIA. The underwear bomber was
CIA. The Boston bombing, the JFK assassination, the
Ford shoots CIA. CIA. Emmett Kjellter, CIA. Norris
Street pipeline, c yeah. You get the point?
Operation Mockingbird, CIA. Guantanamo Bay? Oh, that's right.
Yeah. I gee, I well, I think we're
starting to see a common thread here, but
don't worry. Trump says get them involved now
to save us from the CIA.
Well, here's another example that I'm sure you've
already seen. Guess what, guys?
White House en talks to have Oracle
take over TikTok.
I mean,
does I told you so even cut it
with these things anymore?
12 Ball says pump fake, suddenly the CIA
owns TikTok.
I mean, my god. That's just crazy. And
I think this is obviously what I think
was the plan. I mean, we told you.
I didn't necessarily know it would be Oracle.
That's surprising to me how f in your
face this is. But as I I think
I've tweeted right here.
I didn't include it. But, you know, either
you Oracle or Musk, it's the same point
for me. It's one of those moments where
you have to recognize this is coming together
just like a lot of people predicted.
And that's why tea was at Trump's inauguration.
That's why there's only a 7 day 75
day pause, but they act like everything was
changed, but they've already been censored for Palestine.
Clearly, there's been an organization behind all of
this.
If this happens, how is that different than
before? The game was we don't wanna sell
to a US entity. That's why we were
gonna bring it down. But Trump gave you
75 days, and so you bring it back
up. But now he's saying sell to Oracle.
And they go, okay.
Well, what happened? There's no difference other than
you made it look like Trump did something
and all of that when it seems this
was always the plan. That's what it seems
like to me.
Here's what, James Lee had to say about
it.
Okay. How do I how do I keep
doing this?
That's crazy, man. I swear. I'm gonna get
it right now.
I think what I did is, I'm I
forgot it obviously for those listening. So I'm
downloading it as we speak. The point is
I'm pretty sure I had a what I
do is I if I get the number
wrong, I go down the line downloading them
and I end up deleting the one before
it every time. So I have, like, missing
shots here. There we go.
And here's the clip. Now you've been doing
good work on some of the these, like,
little he does a little breakdown clips, you
know, Admittedly, in the TikTok fashion that I
really do hate, but he does good work.
Here's the the clip on this.
News, the White House is in talks to
have Oracle take over TikTok.
Guys, this was the plan from the very
beginning.
So according to exclusive reporting from NPR, the
Trump administration is working on a plan to
save TikTok that involves tapping software company Oracle
and an outside group of investors to effectively
take control of the app's global operations according
to 2 people with direct knowledge of the
talks. Quote, the goal is for Oracle to
effectively monitor and provide oversight with what's going
on with TikTok. Once again, this was always
the plan. Because if you guys remember, Trump
tried to ban TikTok back in 2020
because of data security issues. And TikTok said,
okay, we'll do something called project Texas. And
project Texas would restructure much of the corporate
arm of TikTok so that the US database
is stored by a US company,
Oracle. Oracle, as a reminder, once again, is
a CIA front. Whole point of Project Texas
was so that the operations would be monitored
by an in house committee approved by the
US government called TikTok US Data Security.
Project Texas would essentially act as a firewall
ensuring that the Chinese government couldn't access user
data and that Oracle would oversee it all.
But then October 7th happened and the Israel
lobby got involved and said, no, screw your
data security. We need the whole app gone.
And so that's what happened. Of course, the
people rebelled and said, screw you guys. We're
just gonna go to an actual Chinese app.
And then congress goes, oops, our bad. And
then they try to backtrack out of that
ban. This is where Trump comes in to
quote unquote save TikTok. But in reality, what's
going on right now is just a reinstitution
of what they meant to do in the
first place, which is to have Oracle
take over TikTok with the goal, of course,
to monitor and oversee everything that's going on
inside the app. So at this point Spying
on you. People have kind of a choice
to make. Do you want the US government
to control your app, or do you want
the CCP?
Neither is ideal, I have to say.
I I would still argue that I don't
think it's as definitively clear that we just
the the Chinese government controls the app. But
I've never pushed back on it because I
think it's just as clear that it's as
likely as the US government through Twitter. But
does the US government control Twitter? I would
argue that's a fair point to make, but
I don't think it's as I don't think
you could just state you know, you get
the point. Like, it's the same difference either
way you look at it. My point, nonetheless,
though, is that overall of it,
I don't see if if other than choosing
a side, it's kind of equivalent. We I
don't want anybody
influencing the outcome. But the game they play
is, well, at least it's for the interest
of America. Is it though? I mean, it's
the interest of your government agenda. That's not
the same as the interest of America because
you guys seem to be attacking Americans more
than anybody today, whether through Zionism or not.
It's a good yeah. And as well, to
be point out, this is James' kind of
reading of all of it. I do agree.
I mean, I think it's pretty clear.
Overall,
you're being played. It was all it's all
theater
for basically, for Israel's interest. And then the
government tap danced around whatever they wanted, and
then, you know, it's it's wild. And now
it comes down to the reality that you
have an a a deep state surveillance entity
that's gonna be able to use that data.
And this is like I mean, as James
Corbett wrote a long time ago, data is
the new oil. It is the most profitable
thing on the planet for these people.
Now you could I'm I'm sure you could
make arguments about new technological things that might
but I argue data is
wildly more profitable than just for especially since
it's
you know, to mine it, I guess. Right?
Or in a in a certain sense. But
I think it's clear.
I just hope people can pay attention to
what's happening. Now meanwhile
alright. Okay. Again, the point is the CIA.
Right? That's what all this seems to be
about. That clearly, if you're talking about Oracle,
which basically is the CIA, guys, Oracle was
the name of the CIA program that Ellison
started with and then they basically pretend it's
like it's like DARPA, XAI, and and Elon
XAI. Now layer Ellison owns his own company.
It's called Oracle and it's totally not the
same thing. These are simply entities that I
think we've already highlighted that are extensions of
the government propaganda or rather, you know, control
structure.
And so the point is that if we're
seeing the CIA constantly being used and reframed
as the good guy in everything and Trump's
going, we need to get them involved now,
isn't there something strange happening here? This radical
turn, this inversion that Steve was talking about?
Well, in this case, it's a very weird
thing that just happened. It's been happening, but
this is a very odd example.
Aren't we all, like, shockingly aware of Operation
Northwood? Like, this common thing that's been brought
up over and over, even in circles in
the corporate media sometimes.
Well, here, Mario North Norful breaks the story.
Shocking.
Doc reveals US government plot to kill Americans
that, yeah, was declassified, like, decades ago. But
here it is. Because narfall breaks it. Or
rather, the Daily Mail breaks it. Because we
know how often the Daily Mail breaks top
secret documents from the US government. Right?
That this is controlled. It's
sad.
Now David Ikes is declassified in 97,
and widely exposed in the wake of 911.
Now the new media is breaking the news.
This repackaging of old information in new ways,
this is how they play this game.
And Truth 3 Media called it out too.
Now always watch their work, guys. 25 minutes.
They always do a great job. They cite
they source everything.
Love their work. Op she writes, the Operation
Northwood's doc is being shared on here today
as if it's new. It's very weird. For
those unaware, this wasn't a government this was
a government plan concocted in 90 62, excuse
me, to stage a false flag terror attack
inside the United States and blame Cuba. It
was declassified in 97. Here's the breakdown they
did a night in October 2017.
And this is the link for this m
m Daily Mail.
And it goes, first time?
I just don't understand how people it's it's
I I do. I shouldn't say that. It's
about controlling, like, it's what I was just
saying earlier. People out there do this work,
whether it's old stories or not, and you
have people in a certain select chosen circle
that get raised up when they point the
things that other people are doing. In many
ways, half stories. You know, a good example
is when Laura Loomer pretended to break the
story about the Azov movement right before October
7th, but very carefully boxed out anything that
had to do with Israel. I'm sure we
can all see why that happened that way.
But she lied, and she pretended it was
all her word. No. It wasn't. I mean,
Alex Burt,
Rubinstein was well before even I I feel
I feel like I was covering it before
most people. He was on it way before
me. And others as well. I mean, it
just the point is, it was out there.
But they get raised up, and they get
pointed to. And it get and it's about
controlling and usually boxing out parts of the
story.
So in this case, they're basically making it
about a one-sided dynamic or or rather that
the CIA was bad back then, but here's
how we're gonna save it basically today because
they're revealing the information. You know, whatever. But
this is the same thing.
Concerned citizen,
citing guess what?
Another CIA interview with corporate media. Why all
of a sudden are all these CIA agents
coming out of the woodwork?
How obvious is this?
And it says, you were attacked. You were
attacked by a direct energy weapon.
And it goes, high powered microwave system weapon
that may have the ability to in intimidate,
weaken, or kill an enemy over time. It
says and this is concerned citizen here. Holy
crap. Listen to the CIA whistleblower confirm direct
energy weapons are real.
Are you serious?
Do you know how long direct energy weapons
have been openly admitted? Do you know how
long like, Fox News did a breakdown story
of this, like, decades ago.
Or how about the reality that we talked
about this
in regard to,
Lahaina?
Oh, of course, it won't pop up now.
There we go.
And I mean, I I did break this
part of the story in regard to and
I still argue that I didn't prove it
was I wasn't saying they were necessarily connected.
I did find it relevant that there was
a directed energy weapons directorate in Maui.
I just thought that was crazy.
But I just said, let's look at the
evidence what we can prove. I still argue
that I don't think it was, and I
stood by that. But the point, not not
that it wasn't possible, but that it did
not appear to be the evidence backed up
that part of the story. But there was
a directed energy we a directorate in Maui
that was a huge part of the story.
My point is, guys, this is not a
this is such a public story. It's like
pretending that we just broke the story about
geoengineering because corporate media has a CIA guy
talk about it. Do you not see that
we're being very carefully crafted into this and
people like this? Like, are you are you
telling me concerned citizen doesn't know this is
already proven? He's been talking about this for
years.
Something out there is going, we're supposed to
be shocked and we're supposed to pretend that
we now know for sure. CIA is the
good guy. They're breaking all the stories to
us.
It feels clumsy to me. What do you
think?
Here's another one. And you saw this one,
New York Times. CIA now favors lab leak
theory. And this is Ratcliffe who's now head
of the CIA, because that's not concerning at
all.
Favors Lab Leak theory. I mean, guys, this
is about dragging you in step by step.
Now they're gonna break the story that we
all were very clearly talking about right at
the beginning that was cast aside as an
absolute fake story and everyone was censored and
deleted. And and now it's like, okay, with
that part. But, well, of course, it's not
that it was a weapon, though. It was
an accident.
Be and the Democrats probably, or whatever it
is. You know, it's some kind of side
stepping story that hides the reality, mostly most
likely that this probably wasn't even part of
the story. That we're talking about some next
level technological thing that we've highlighted a lot
on this channel. Or even with Denny Rancourt's
work around whether it was anything there at
all.
But the CIA said, so now we know
is what we're getting from the Republicans.
Well, I already covered this general release. The
great re the re the great partisan rebranding.
They're all on the same side, guys, and
all they're trying to do is create this
new dynamic or really a new dichotomy because
it's all failing. That's like the rebranding of
the the or the corporate reorganization that they
we were talking about before.
Andrea Lynn says here's how the Hegelian Dialectic
works in politics. Hegelian Dialectics operates as a
controlled cycle in which the establishment utilizes both
Democrats and Republicans to achieve a shared agenda.
First, they create or amplify a problem to
provoke a reaction. Fear or outrage such as
terrorism, pandemics, economic crises. Next, they encourage predictable
reactions from the public, with each party offering
seemingly opposing narratives.
Finally, the preplanned solution is introduced
often as a compromise, but it always aligns
with the puppet master's goals, such as an
increased surveillance, centralized power, erosion of freedoms.
By controlling both sides, they create the illusion
of opposite while steering society toward their agenda.
Once you understand their game, the false divisions
dissolve and everything becomes clear.
Just hoping people can see how obvious that
is right now.
But, of course,
VISRAGAD 24, the Israeli propaganda platform, says, woke
ideology is the cancer that must be removed,
Malay.
Elon Musk says, and it is being removed.
But then we're all good. Right? Because that's
all that matters.
Well, that's all they keep doing. Who cares
about the AI infrastructure, the mRNA cancer shots,
the we the WEF and general overlap. I
mean, any number of things that are shockingly
alarming.
Or that both of them went to speak
at the at the World Economic Forum, Trump
and Malay. Or at least virtually, I'm one
of them.
But as long as they stood up there
and said there's 2 genders, we acted like,
oh, they're fighting everybody.
I've never seen such a flimsy engagement, guys.
I I'm surprised, in fact.
But their banking on the only thing you
care about is the division tactics they've already
shoved in your face. Most of which has
already been largely fought back because it's ridiculous.
But here we are.
Don't don't, you know, don't man the mind
behind the curtain.
Lastly on this, Tommy Robinson says admin post
is this racist? And it says we can
we cannot coexist with people who think raping
children is acceptable.
I see nobody disagrees with that. And I
simply said, well, any comment on this part
of the issue?
Or is this issue not really what you're
fighting against?
And here's the Israeli article that is literally
entitled, by legitimizing rape, Israeli society takes one
step further towards moral decay.
August 2024.
Haaretz.
You just go ahead and type rape or,
you know, any number of these things. It
is overwhelming.
Something like I think it was something like
60% of the women in the IDF have
been sexually abused by men in the IDF.
And then they focused on this, and then
years later followed up, and it was, like,
70, 80%.
I'm not making this up. The numbers could
be slightly different. I already covered this in
the show. My point is it is overwhelming
that there's the I mean, we just saw
them defend raping prisoners.
And this is what he wants you to
think about?
Or
a clip we played of the State Department
official telling you that Israel they were reported
that a child was raped, and instead of
doing anything about it, they accused the group
of terrorism and shut it all down and
hid the evidence?
So what was that again about Tommy caring
about people raping children? He realized how many
people in Israel,
Gaza, Palestine, Syria, Lebanon are exposing they're being
raped by Israeli in prisons or anywhere else.
The UN has been covering it for decades.
But I'm sure he wants to call that
out too. Right, Robbie
or Tommy Robinson?
No.
I think we all know why.
Now,
unfortunately, went a lot too longer than I
wanted there, but let's jump into the next
next part of this. And I may skip
some of it, but I'm gonna make sure
we get to the the central part of
the ceasefire deal, which sadly enough, if you've
already watched our our discussions, you already know
what's going on. These are just the details
that are continue to back up the unfortunate
reality of what we already told you was
happening. And that's the that's it's e
unfortunately,
exactly the case.
So she well, starting with
more points about foreign policy from Rubio.
And you might have seen this. Right? State
Department freezes new funding for nearly all
USAID programs.
Can you guess which ones weren't frozen?
Except
for Israel and Egypt.
And Egypt is for Israel. So it's Israeli
funding that didn't stop.
That's the reality.
Everywhere else in the world oh, but not
for Israel though. While they're committing genocide, we
can't stop their funding for the genocide.
Promises kept? Yeah? Is that what we're pretending?
Well, here's an interesting point. Rangrim says, just
to be clear, separate from what you think
the of the merits of what Trump is
doing to USAID and other foreign programs, he
says it's flagrantly illegal for the president not
to faithfully execute the laws passed by Congress.
Now I'm of the mind that we have
long since been in a position, if ever,
that this even mattered to any of them.
But it's interesting to me that he makes
a very valid point. This is the whole
point of rule by executive order. The idea
that what you're doing like, so congress
decide they're supposed to be funding a lot
of it and then they just write a
piece of paper and say, nope. No. Executive
order, which doesn't even legally actually apply, but
we just pretend it does. The point
is that that's supposed to be the check
and balance we pretend exists.
Right? But that doesn't exist anymore, which is
transparently obvious from the last many different administrations.
But all he's doing is highlighting that. Congress
passes laws, the president signs them, and then
executes those laws. He cannot decide on his
own to simply say, pause x, y, and
z, or stop pay you know, that that's
the he's right.
But I don't think we've been in that
position for a very long time. It's not
Democrat or Republican. It's just it's broken, guys.
And it's probably from foreign entities. But it's
interesting to think about.
And the one that does not stop,
so many examples that just tell you what's
going on, guys. Now on top of that,
on the overlapping with the with the Stargate
project,
this is from the OpenAI platform announcing Stargate.
I just wanna point this out. So if
we wanna pretend this is only about the
United States, look at what the Stargate project
on OpenAI says explicitly.
This infrastructure will secure American leadership in AI,
create 100 of thousands of jobs. I still
argue that actually won't be the outcome. Almost
like every one of these data centers that
that doesn't end up being the outcome, whether
because they outsource or use visa programs. It's
the same conversation. I'll point it out in
a second. But it says, well, better for
the world. Then it says, this project will
not only support the reindustrialization
of the United States,
but also provide a strategic capability
to protect the national security of America and
its allies.
Anybody wanna guess at what that might mean?
I'll let you have fun with that.
Now here's what may Marjorie Taylor Greene had
to say. President Trump and our new secretary
of state, Marco Rubio, just stopped all foreign
aid to Ukraine and other countries except Israel
and Egypt.
So you might think she's gonna go, that's
a no. She goes, the state department is
shocked. The American people are not. We're celebrating.
Think about
that. Now, really, objectively, the majority of this
country does not support Israel. That's despite all
the names and narrative, the fact is that
the world is so aware of this left
and right of a genocide. It's clear.
What's crazy to me is that she thinks
not only she could pretend that everyone in
this country supports that, but even that ever
that anybody. Why is it American interest to
support Israel? Whether or not they're committing a
genocide?
Think about that. Like, this is America first,
except we gotta keep fighting Israel. These people
are openly contradictory. That's why I don't I
wonder why so many conservatives are not calling
this out.
I think most of them are, but there's
a lot of them that are still kind
of pulling punches with this stuff.
Is that America first?
They that's what they're trying to pretend. Right?
Americanism is Zion. No. It's not.
But hear them, when they say America First,
they're not talking about just America, guys, or
at all, as far as I can tell.
But she goes, we're celebrating.
No. We're not.
And I said, make Israel great again. Right,
guys? Or is she misrepresenting what the American
people actually want? And why would she possibly
do such a thing? Hashtag APAC.
Well, she's getting a lot of money from
them.
And on top of that, in case you
didn't know this as well, because that and
that's my point about giving money.
Like, she basically remember, she says, she they
stopped money to Ukraine and all other countries.
Is that the case?
Well, I said, and let's not forget,
Israel
funds Ukraine and the Azov movement. So if
Trump is still funding Israel, which it it
commits a multi as it commits a multi
nation genocide,
which he explicitly made sure to do, then
he is still funding Ukraine.
Simple. Sorta like the double GaBi overlay. I
got the same game. If you're funding Israel
more than ever and they're funding Ukraine, well,
then they're then you're funding Ukraine. It's pretty
simple. So at the end of the day,
as he said he was gonna keep funding
Ukraine, well, that appears to be the case.
Now but this isn't the only point. But
just alone, you have to understand. I I
linked this to the Peretz article that tells
you that, well, in 2018, they were funding
the Azov movement, and Jews in the country
were like, why are you funding Neo Nazis?
Well, because they always have, guys. That's the
point.
But it gets better.
Back on 2024,
December, remember Trump said he was gonna keep
funding Ukraine. Right? After the inauguration.
But we've had a little shift here and
there, as they're now saying, well, no. We
just paused it all. Right?
But I don't think that's the case. Not
only because they're funding Israel, which funds Ukraine,
which is guaranteed to be the way that
continues,
but Zelensky came up and said, guess what?
He hasn't stopped.
How funny is that? This is recent. This
is a new article on 25th.
US has not stopped military aid to Ukraine,
Zelensky says. Oops.
Well, guess what? Because I don't think they
ever were going to. Because, clearly, this is
about more than what the US government pretends
to want. This is about what Zionism wants.
That's the reality of what this Ukraine war
is all about for a large long term
reason. On top of the fact that it's
both of them working against well, there's a
lot of different moving parts, of course, with
Russia and the overlap of this of what
just allowed Syria to be taken. Right? Now
let's not forget Russia and the overlap with
Israel are also very important to remember. But
what happened there, I think, was clearly about
allowing the Syrian dynamic to be the way
it is today,
along with a lot of other things. But
how interesting is it?
So all you get is a narrative over
here, and then you have a lot of
other evidence that continues to show that they
are still getting the funding. They're still using
all the thing so tough for you to
decide. Evidence versus narrative.
Now I simply said, I cannot tell you
how completely unsurprised I am about Zelensky saying
they're still being funded. And I shouldn't have
to always include that Zelensky obviously could be
lying. That falls squarely into question everything mentality.
But this lines up with perfectly all the
evidence and past actions.
So it's, again, you can choose to look
at the evidence or a narrative. I think
it's obvious what a smart person would do.
The point here is that this is what
he already said he would do. It's what
the past actions are. I think it's obvious
what's happening. Now on top of that, back
to the Israel point, this is not just
some old point about past art funding, guys.
Now this goes to 2023.
It says in first, which is not true.
It's it's what's so funny about it. They've
been funding them a long time as I
just showed you. But in a first, Israel
said to authorize sale of defensive military equipment
to Ukraine. Well, so they just wanted you
to know about it is the point. So
20 23, Israel arming Ukraine. Okay? Here is
up to 2024.
Israel has been providing unprecedented aid to Ukraine.
This is the embassy of Israel in Kyiv.
So they're just simply saying, oh, they get
they've been unprecedentedly
funding
Gaza or excuse me, Ukraine.
Well, here's the newest example. This is brand
new. It's from today.
Israel, quote, sends weapons captured in Lebanon to
Ukraine. So now you got Israel literally illegally
invading and occupying Lebanon, stealing their resources and
dumping them over to Ukraine in an unprecedented
fashion.
More than we've seen. Guys, it's obvious what's
happening.
This is a facilitation of the same dynamic,
so you pretend that Trump's not I think
that's obvious. Either way, Israel is still being
funded to the United States, and Israel is
still funding Ukraine. That has to matter.
And in more ways than we've ever seen
before. On top of that, this is also
new.
Oh, excuse me. This is 2022, but it
says Israel debt debt donating weapons to Ukraine
via third countries.
So the point is that the newest one
new is what I just showed you. This
one is simply showing you that they're historically
been funneling things around to Ukraine through other
countries.
So it's the that backs up what Israel
does, but also how you the US keeps
funding Ukraine.
Glenn Greenwald points out that Ukraine's chief army
psychologist was arrested Tuesday, this is on the
22nd,
on charges of stealing $1,000,000 in foreign aid.
Now, of course, people would love to make
this about Biden. It's not. It's it's a
nonpartisan thing, and they're still funding in Ukraine.
But it says he bought apartment buildings, BMWs,
$150,000
home. No wonder Dembs and McConnell called Rand
Paul a Kremlin agent for wanting an audit.
Now I agree. I mean, it's it's obvious
that people were trying to cover up what
this was and very much overlaps with the
Biden family. There's no way around that.
I very clearly think it's about Israel's interest,
and that's why all of them are compromised.
But the point is that this has been
ongoing.
And, again, if you wanna make it only
about Trump, that's your failing. The point is
it's not left or right. It goes back
before many, many, many different administrations. They've been
doing the same thing. I've been writing about
this or covering this for years.
This goes back to the forties, funding a
fascist element in this area in order to
manipulate the Soviet Union. And they've just continued
them all the way to the Oz Up
Movement, guys. The CIA, yet again. But guess
what? Trump wants them involved because they're gonna
save us.
Fiorella points out, as expected,
Trump is now sending the 1800 MK 84,
2,000 pound bombs
to Israel
that they were that were put on hold
by Biden, which I at the time, I
even proved to you that was I don't
think they ever actually stopped anything.
Nonetheless,
publicly, at least as an as a,
statement,
Trump has allowed them to go back.
Remember all the claim of, oh, save Israel
for last and all these different narratives without
all that did was allow people to ignore
the fact that he was gonna keep allowing
the genocide to continue, which is what we
all knew if you were paying attention.
Understand how this works, she says. They take
turns screwing you and the rest of the
world. That's what happens when the intel military
apparatus runs the country. Here we go again.
MK84. You know, the same bombs, by the
way, that they used all the way back
then to bomb a school bus. Remember Jim
court Jim Carrey made a cartoon about it?
It was all there it's all big. They
talked about it for a moment, even though
there's multiple buses of school children that got
killed after that that nobody talked about.
Nonetheless, the point is this has been ongoing
for a long time. Now that was Yemen,
by the way, the school bus. Same point,
though. The US government use allowing their weapons
to be used for terrorism.
How is this still happening with what we
know? Even his own base pretended this wasn't
gonna happen, and here we are.
David Ike says, of course, Israel owns him
in regard to giving him these weapons.
Patrick Henningkson points out Mario novel saying the
same thing. How he Mario novel can't contain
his excitement about 2,000 pound bombs being used
in genocide against Palestinian
people. Can't contain his excitement about £2,000 bonds
being used in genocide against Palestinian
people.
Never forget
who have doomed to power. He says those
who have doomed to power and promote
genocide and platform. Basically, I think he's trying
to say don't don't never forget who have
continued to support the war criminals.
But, of course, here's why it all makes
sense though. Right? Just like the other game
with, you know, the the WHO gave you
a better deal, so it'll all work out.
He goes, Trump says in his troops social
post, a lot of things that were ordered
and paid for by Israel but have not
been sent by Biden are on their way.
God, you're easy to play.
Right? Because bad guy, Democrat Biden wouldn't do
it. We have to because we're the better
one. Clinton wouldn't do it, so we have
to.
Are we really that easy to play? My
god.
As Tiberius says, correction, paid for by the
American people so Israel can murder more children.
All he's doing is giving you this lazy
argument so you pretend like Biden wouldn't do
it, so it's the right thing to do.
If that's as basic as your mind works.
The truth is they are continuing to fund
genocide,
and that's the best answer he can give
you.
Hopefully, that makes you angry.
APAC tracker says Israelis get universal health care
while Americans fund their country's existence.
Now, quote, conservative, Verne Brook Buchanan, wants to
invest more money into Israeli health care and
tech.
There he says, the US must strengthen ties
with Israel, our greatest ally in the Middle
East, hardly.
I'd love someone to point out a single
benefit of other than, you know, bombing the
US liberty and 911 and, you know, all
the things they've used to control. Oh, the
Omskirk. That's for the benefit of the US
government.
Israel has not been an ally of the
United States. Period. And it says, and a
health care tech leader. That's what they that's
what rep Verne Buchanan wants to create. Support
health care advancements.
Please to introduce a bipartisan bill to promote
innovation in health care. Oh, okay. So give
more money to Israel.
Why is this what American politicians aren't even
discussing right now? Why they were not they're
committing a genocide? As this person said, what
happened to America first?
There are some honest people out there.
Now, on the conversation again of the stargate
overlap,
there's some important points to make here. Oh,
the again, with the Israeli connection to all
of this.
The SoftBank point that I was mentioning earlier.
I wanna reiterate this in case you missed
it. Because realize, guys, so for we were
talking about first, you know, just the problems
of the AI infrastructure dynamic, the mRNA direction.
So again, though, I wanna now we're in
the foreign policy side of this. I wanna
reiterate how alarming this is to me.
This is just like a basic search from
Brave about the connections to Israel from SoftBank.
But I wanna overlap this with something is,
written about Israel that what you have put
out for a limited hangout.
Here's what this says first, though.
SoftBank has a significant
connection with Israel through various investments and partnerships.
The company has invested in several Israeli tech
firms. Those are the startups that are basically
covers for their intelligence apparatus. Additionally, SoftBank has
taken a stake in OurCrowd,
Israel's most active venture capital firm. It says
this strategic partnership aims to help promising Israeli
startups grow into international tech champions. So, basically,
SoftBank is the financial arm of the venture
or or basically
a stake in the financial vent, venture capital
firm that is seeding the money to these
start startups that are basically intelligence.
I'll read you again from their own statements
on this. This is furthermore, SoftBank has appointed
Yassir Cohen, the former head of the Israeli
intelligence facade.
SoftBank's Vision Fund 2 has invested in Cyber
Reason and US Israeli cybersecurity firm. And that's
what I'm gonna highlight more on.
That is the CEO who is running this
and the backing group that is finance running
the finances of Stargate,
The AI infrastructure of the United States.
It's Israel, guys. That's what this is. Or
Oracle, which is working on the CIA cutout.
Or, Sam or Sam Altman, who is I
mean, every one of these things are
on its face,
not what we were promised.
But here
is an additional point that is that Whitney
wrote about that I wanna highlight.
How an Israeli spy linked tech firm
gained access to the US government's most classified
networks.
It says through its main investor,
SoftBank
and Lockheed Martin,
not only Cyber Reason not only has ties
to Trump administration, but its software running on
some of US government's most classified networks.
So all this intertwines.
Cyber Reason being the one predicting the 2020
election issues. Right? And Israel was hyping this.
It was it's an Israeli company saying, look.
You're gonna be chaos.
SoftBank is one of its main investors. Now
SoftBank is running the Stargate program. Here's what
is here's what Whitney had to point out.
And she's talking about an Israeli smiling tech
firm. And it says it says and that's
Cyber Reason, right, by the way. But the
SoftBank being a the investor, it says Cyber
Reason,
thus far, has disclosed the following groups that
is lead investors in the company.
One is Charles River Ventures,
Spark Capital, Lockheed Martin, and SoftBank.
So Cyber Reason being in is a very
concerning Israeli startup that's intelligence, what this is.
Lots you should read in here. But under
SoftBank Cyber Reason Vision Fund, it says SoftBank
first invested in Cyber Reason 2015.
The same year Lockheed Martin initially invested and
partnered with the firm. It was also the
year that SoftBank announced its intention to invest
in Israeli startup companies.
SoftBank first injected $50,000,000
in a cyber reason, followed by an additional
100,000,000 in 2017.
200,000,000 more last August. This is Britain,
where was it?
2020.
Hold on. Here we go.
And it says SoftBank's investments account for most
of the money raised by the company.
So the I I I'm I feel like
SoftBank is a financial cut up for Israeli
intelligence. That's my opinion. And it says, mow
many of SoftBank's investments and acquisitions in the
US since then have fum focused mainly on
artificial intelligence
and technology. Well, what do you know? With
military applications such as killer robots from Boston
Dynamics, suggesting SUNS, which is the,
myomat or what is it? I'm not forgetting
his name again.
The one the guy the the may the
the lead the entity that is leading the
SoftBank as aspect of the Stargate.
Saying where was it? Sun. Remember they called
him Ma Miyoshi Sun, but that's, like, for
the anyway, saying his suggesting Sun's interest lie
lies more in dominating futuristic military industrial technologies
than creating jobs for average Americans.
It says, though through the creation of this
fund alongside the Saudis, SoftBank has since become
interestingly intertwined with Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin
Salman. You know, the authoritarian dictator of that
totally not problematic entity that's completely partnered with
all the good guys. Right?
In big, big quotes.
And it says, the key ally of Trump
in the Middle East known for his authoritarian
crackdowns on Saudi elites and dissidents alike. The
ties between Saudi Arabia and SoftBank became even
tighter when bin Salman took the reins of
the oil kingdom and after SoftBank announced the
launch of its Vision Fund in 2016.
SoftBank's Vision Fund is a vehicle for investing
in high-tech companies and startups, and its largest
shareholder is the Public Investment Fund, Saudi Arabia.
Notably,
Sun did from SoftBank decided to launch the
Vision Fund in Riyadh during president Trump's first
official visit to the Gulf Kingdom.
Now I'm out of the mind that Saudi
Arabia in its own right in general is
sort of like the attack dog of both
Israel and the United States. But I think
you could arguably say this started from the
very same people behind the same structure we're
talking about. And it says, as a consequence,
SoftBank's Vision Fund is majority funded by 2
Middle East authoritarian governments with close ties to
the US government, specifically the Trump administration.
In addition, both countries have enjoyed the rapid
growth and normalization of ties with the state
of Israel in recent years, particularly
following the rise of currents
at the time, Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin
Salman and Jared Kushner's rise to prominence in
his father in law's administration.
Today as well. Our investments in the Vision
Fund, other investments have come from Apple, Qualcomm,
and Oracle's Larry Ellison, all tech companies with
strong ties to Israel's government. You really think
this is all just coincidence?
The Saudi government and Emirati governments linked to
the Vision Fund are so obvious that even
mainstream outlets like the New York Times have
described them as a front for Saudi Arabia
and perhaps other countries in the Middle East.
Gee, I wonder what they're including in that
big caveat. And it says, what SoftBank also
got is a financial tie to the family
of president Trump's senior adviser and son-in-law, Jared
Kushner,
who is a Zionist, who is exactly I
mean, we already saw this with the arguments
about the beachfront.
This guy is working for Israel, in my
opinion. According to The Real Deal, Kushner Companies
obtained
the financing from Fortress only after its attempts
to obtain funding through the EB 5 Visa
program.
For a specific real estate venture were were
abandoned after the US attorney and the security
of the SEC
began to investigate how Kushner Companies had been
using the EB 5 investor visa program.
A key factor in the opening of that
investigation was Kushner's company's representatives
touting Jared Kushner's position at the White House
when talking to prospective investors and and lenders.
Well, an interesting side note,
why is it the EB 5 Visa program
that he was abusing?
Well, it's an investment based Visa program that
allows foreign nationals to obtain a green card
by investing in a new commercial enterprise in
the United States.
Well, gee, I guess that goes back long
before Elon Musk. And we're talking about different
visas here, but the same conversation.
Can you say hypocrisy, ladies and gentlemen? Let's
say it together. Hypocrites.
Okay. Going
forward,
it says, furthermore, with cyber reasons close and
enduring ties to Israeli military intelligence now well
documented,
it is worth asking if Israeli military intelligence
would consider intervening in 2020 if
the still to be decided Democratic contender was
strongly opposed to Israeli government policy,
particularly Israel's military occupation of Palestine. This is
especially worth considering given revelations that sexual blackmailer
and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who targeted prominent US
politicians, mostly Democrats, was in the employ of
Israeli military intelligence.
Notably, Cyber Reason's doomsday election scenarios involve the
weaponization of deep fakes,
self driving cars, and the hacking of Internet
of Things devices.
Maybe it wasn't about that one.
But with all of these technologies being pioneered
and perfected not by Russia, China, or Iran,
but by companies directly tied to Israeli intelligence,
much like Cybereason itself.
These companies, their technology, and Cybereason's
own work creating the narrative that US rival
states seek to undermine the US election in
this way will all be discussed in the
conclusion of Mintra's series on cyber reasons, which
no links are included. The point, though, is
that, obviously,
you could argue that it didn't happen, maybe
it wasn't real, but these were real discussion.
They really like, these are just simply games
like we've seen with the exercise of the
past.
The point to take away from this is
the cyber reasons, SoftBank, Overlap, Ellison, OpenAI, Tra
all of this. This is just bubbling back
up right now in a different form. And
the Israeli
tendrils around all of it just can't be
ignored.
And I'll include Whitney's
interview with me about CIA Mossad link surveillance
systems being quietly installed throughout the United States.
Our conversation around the or my show around
the greater Israel point in Israel's global cybersecurity
infiltration, which is exactly what this is. Cyber
reason, this is the conversation of that discussion
of the 2020 election. We'll get more deep
into it. Or the Prince and the Spy
article from Whitney Webb, which I've referenced because
I wanna show you this one last part,
which the point is, in this article, they're
openly stating this.
Contains a stunning revelation that many Israeli companies,
including Black Cube, have been founded as simply
fronts for Israeli intelligence operations as far back
as 2012. It states that since 2012,
cyber related intelligence projects that were previously carried
out in house in Israeli military
and their intelligence arms are transferred to the
companies that, in some cases, were built for
that exact purpose.
Meaning, to cover their intelligence operations.
These were being this is being stated by
people in the know in the conversation. And
that's what the article is about. Read it
for
yourself. So we need to think about this
when it comes to things like this. SoftBank
adds a $100,000,000,000
to US Israeli cyber firm, Cyber Reason.
Or this guy being a Mossad agent working
for SoftBank.
Same one we talked about continuing to call
for funding for Hamas.
Now in the Syria point of this, I
do think it's important to highlight quickly the
ongoing reality of Syria and what is get
before we get into the point about the
ceasefire, to realize that this is what they're
doing everywhere.
It's it's not unique to one location right
now and it's becoming very, very hard to
ignore, and I think everyone is seeing it.
But I wanna start with a clip of
of what, Dave Smith here had to say,
which I think is spot on.
Beef with Israel has nothing to do with
how I feel about Jewish people or how
I feel about myself. I just think it's
really wrong. You can't occupy a group of
people since 1967 and then indiscriminately
slaughter them. That's not cool. And why why
on earth should I be forced to to
fund that, especially when it's it's so clearly
at the expense of my country
and my country's interest? And and, you know,
again, nobody's done better work on this than
than you, Aaron, but look at Syria is,
like, just the perfect example of this. Where
you have it, like, it's so black and
white. You have on one side, you have
Al Qaeda, the enemy of the American people.
And on the other side, you had Bashar
al Assad, the enemy of the Israeli government.
And who are we picking?
We're picking the enemy of our of my
country's people. It's such an outrage, you know?
That's just basically my view on it. Occupations
are wrong.
Killing women and children is wrong. It's all
indefensible to me. It's crazy the way he
says that. Like, it's like who in the
world is disagreeing with him? You know? And
what's crazy though is that I don't really
think that's the Well, it depends on we
American people. I would agree with that. But
Al Qaeda is not the enemy of the
US government. It's just not. And the facts
are shockingly obvious, especially with now supporting them
in Syria. Surprise, surprise. But I just love
the way he broke that down because, you
know, he's just so he's very relatable person.
Right? It's the way he's saying it. But
it's like it's just it's so common sense.
Like, it's just so frustrating that we have
to pretend like there's some kind of nuance
dynamic here. He's like, no. You're these are
these what they're doing is disgusting. It's wrong.
And to pretend like he somehow only hates
Jewish people but and that's why he's saying
this is the only thing they can say
right now. And it's not true. It's simply
not. And this is what we're seeing in
Syria. As I already showed you before,
photos of the new Israeli military base that
is right now being built in Syria. But
are we still pretending they're not just occupying
Syria like we told you they were, using
their proxy element of Al Qaeda?
Well, this is the reality of the base
that's already being built, so it's hard to
deny. And I said, totally all about freedom.
Right? Not about the Greater Israel Project at
all. Even though you can literally see
that they have designs on almost all of
Syria. Surprise, surprise.
That's the Great Israel project. This is not
a secret. That's a real map from their
own statements and their own presentations.
This one is about
people. So we already know they're there because
they're building a base. Right? But this is
a video showing the deployment of more Israeli
forces
on the ground in Syria
led in parallel with Hayatir al Sham.
It's just it's that crazy, guys. They're the
they are done pretending,
Which is what we've always been talking about.
That this is their role. This is they're
coming out of the shadows. Whatever the structure
always has been, the real technocratic Zionist,
globalist, whatever it is. They're so they're going,
we're done. We're done pretending like these puppets
are in charge.
We're showing you. We're we're walking alongside Al
Qaeda and we're taking control of territory and
murdering everyone our way and we're just gonna
pretend like it's freedom and everyone's gonna shut
up.
I said, quite a few told you so
moments coming to pass right now. And we're
only a few days in. This was on
the 23rd.
Deploying Israeli forces into Israel. We're gonna or
into Syria.
That's how damn obvious all of this is.
Hi, Charles Schomb literally congratulates Donald Trump on
his inauguration.
Clown world, indeed.
Or the fact that Derek points out, Freemasons
are announcing a return to Syria after being
banned for 50 years. Sure there's nothing no
importance there.
Freemasons eyeing a comeback in Syria.
They've been banned for over 50 years, and
now suddenly the US takes control with Israel
and, hey, Freemasons are welcome back in the
country. Now I'm sure people have varying opinions
on that, but the interesting timing is hard
to miss.
Here is an example of the body of
a university professor, doctor Rasha Nasir,
al Ali,
who was found with her fingers severed and
other signs of torture. She was known to
be pro Assad.
This comes a day after she and other
university professors were arrested by militants linked to
the new US backed regime, Al Jahan Al
Jalani regime. So terrorists, Hayat al Sham.
And the evidence, watch for yourself. It's kinda
it's hard to watch. They've kidnapped these people
right out of the area from the university.
It's on video. They're mostly missing now. And
one of them has now been found with
their fingers severed, another sign of torture.
Weirdly, just like everywhere else, Israel's in control.
Kim.com
points out the reality that we all should
know
this is not unique to one location or
the other. This is what they've always been
telling you. They've always wanted. And the only
thing that's hiding this is people who are
influenced enough to pretend it's not as clear
as it is.
Solomon Ahmed points out, Israeli minister of finance,
Bez Smotrich,
openly this is October 9, 2024.
I want a Jewish state that includes Jordan,
Lebanon, parts of Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia.
According to our great sages, Jerusalem is destined
to extend all the way to Damascus.
But we're pretending this isn't what he thinks?
Guys, he's had entire conferences about this. All
of them agree with this. This is what
their plan is. Can you not see it?
Kim dotcom says Israel wants to expand into
6 sovereign countries in the Middle East to
form a greater Israel. Isn't it ironic how
the US government falsely accused Russia of wanting
to invade numerous NATO countries while its genocidal
partner plans to illegally conquer parts of Middle
East? Yeah.
It's cartoonishly clear, but people wanna lie about
it.
Well, here's what's actually going on. Whether it's
Syria, Lebanon, or, Gaza, or everywhere else they're
bombing for no reason,
They are destroying territory for their own interests
and your governments are not just aware of
that, they're facilitating it. And monsters like Matt
Miller
are well okay with that. Or at the
very least, are
paid enough to be quiet about it.
Remember when he told you this was a
limited operation in Rafa? We'll have a close
look at what this looks like.
Continues to be something we're watching incredibly closely,
but we still have not yet seen them,
launch what looks like a full scale major
military operation, certainly not in the size, scope,
or scale of the operations in Khan Yunus,
in Gaza City, elsewhere in Gaza.
It's been a a more limited operation, which
is not to say it hasn't had a
dramatic impact,
on the population there. Look at that.
It's
gone. Flat.
It's destroyed.
He knows this, guys. He's a monster. This
guy's an absolute monster who's very well aware
of what's going on.
That's destruction. That's gone. There's no there's not
there's no such thing as limited anything when
the when everything's gone. Everything we're seeing,
and we can't see everything, but everything that
we can see tells us that they are
not moving in in a major ground operation
in population centers in the center,
Rafa. Now remember what they said is, well,
when when when I really pushed to it,
like, lines of people marching in,
and then that's literally what happened. We showed
you lines of them marching, and they still
pretended it wasn't
happening. We still don't wanna see the Israelis,
as we say, smash into Rafa with large
units over over
large pieces of of territory.
We still believe that, and we haven't seen
that at this point. Yep.
It's gone, guys. And they did. And they
lied about it. Kirby, Miller,
Patel,
all of them deserve to be in jail
cells for knowingly doing this.
This is the largest, most obvious, well documented
genocide in history. There's no way around that
anymore.
And they know it.
And that's why whether or not they ever
wanna be honest about it, it's too late
now.
They're locked in.
And that's probably part of the whole blackmail
dynamic of Israel's Zionism on them in the
first place. Here,
Lara Friedman points out, yes, folks. This is
real. And and by the way, this is.
I mean, not only are there a a
bunch of other people using their own Google
map dynamic, I'll show you the actual video,
but it's crazy how often this happens. This
that shouldn't be even shocking to you. She
goes, yes. It's real. I just took the
screenshot myself. Pull up Bet Hanon on Google
Maps and see for yourself.
See, it's though it seems like Google will
blur the image at some point, which is
what they always do, it's showing you that
through the farmland, not only they're ra are
they deliberately destroying the farmland, which there's no
one's try no one anywhere has rationalized that.
They just try to tell you, like, in
the one some cases that they ever talk
about, it's because, you know, we're trying to
stop a moss.
But this is po there's a crime. International
this is a war crime. You are destroying
infrastructure, destroying food, buildings,
and they run over everything and then draw
Star of David with the destruction.
That's what we've come to expect from these
monsters.
And they're all finding the same thing.
And it's not that unique, remember? Because we
talked about this. I couldn't find the article.
We we I covered this a while back.
I I I I I've had trouble finding
it on TLIVE last time as well. It's
not the title. It's the picture, though. And
so they blank it out because they don't
want you to see the guy apparently. But
remember, this guy had a star of David
burned into his face.
And they literally tried to convince you that
it was his boots.
Like like your boots being pressed. Like, that
that is a burn, guys. And we know
it. It's obvious. And it was even later
admitted because they were got caught and horets
covered it. Israeli police brands Palestinian prisoner with
the Star of David. And here we are
with the same thing. That's the kind of
supremacy we're dealing with. Now that, in this
case, are people that are doing so with
the idea of Judaism in their mind. Understand.
This is not about this is that would
be a Judy a Jewish person that is
being manipulated through Zionism, in my opinion.
I could be wrong. It's for you to
decide. But I think it's quite obvious.
If there are Christian Zionists, which there are
more today than there are Jewish Zionists, there's
no way you could pretend it's only about
Jewish people. The same way you would have
a extremist like Hegseth force in his mindset
in the same way. It's the same thing.
It's extremism, guys.
Whatever it is. Whether you feel the Star
of David is what you burn on the
face, which by the way is not even
a symbol of Judaism, and it's a symbol
of Israel. And we've talked about this. It's
a long term manipulation, but I'm sure people
will push back.
Sarah Wilkinson. The Israelis have deliberately contributed to
Gaza's long term food insecurity by bulldozing, polluting,
and destroying fertile agricultural lands.
Now this is a slow video. Will you
walk look at this guys. It goes on
this is all farmland and overlapping area that
needs to be used that is now gone
and destroyed. And on top of just destroying
it,
in many cases, they have used white phosphorus
to deliberately
make the land inusable for as long as
possible.
That was covered by human rights groups.
Then Mohammed and Safa just this is I'll
just let you watch for yourself. It's the
longer video that goes along a lot of
the territory. It starts all the way back
on Gaza, like the whole see the whole
map right there.
And it zooms in, and it goes over
to this just
destructive, gone territories.
Just completely annihilated.
On top of that,
I've seen the number theory, tens of thousands.
He's reporting an estimated 50,000
orphans in Gaza.
This is just a video of a bunch
of children eating,
trying to survive.
You know, now that they've allowed aid in.
Right? Because that's they were making sure it
didn't happen. I'll get to that in a
second.
But this one's wild, man. Look at this
one.
What you're seeing here
is all the clothes that were dropped when
they just randomly came across a group of
people and made them just d get naked
and shuffle them across the and, oh, they're
all Hamas bad guys.
Look at that.
These were just Palestinians and mobs that they
just literally accosted, made them strip down, wrapped
them up, tortured them, starved them, and these
are the people that they're letting out.
Ryan Raspiani points out, in 470 days, they
did all this damage. I mean, again, just
look at the bombing. Are we gonna pretend
like they were try they were pinpoint targeting
anything?
Or alternatively,
not deliberately trying to kill everybody in the
area, including their own people?
It's
crazy.
As Sal Rad points out in Harat's article,
it says, in Gaza, they're amputating limbs without
painkillers. This is January 25th, 2025.
Imagine your child doing going through that. Subtitle
says, executive director for physicians for human rights
Israel.
Describes the country's deliberate destruction of Gaza's health
system. I mean, it's right on the surface
even from the Israeli human rights groups or
Herets.
As she says,
Israeli media acknowledges their deliberate destruction. Why doesn't
the US media do the same? I think
we know why.
Here is what they're how they're trying to
frame this. And even CB
or CNBC,
I mean, is talking to this guy like
he's a child.
Like,
come on, man. We all know what's happening.
Like, that's how he's being regarded here. Watch
this video. How in the world we can
get here and still pretend like we don't
know what this is and still allow us
to continue?
Much much less civil casualties in Lebanon
than we had in Gaza. And the reason
is that we don't wanna hurt innocent people.
However Minister. When they hide behind the civilians
Minister. We're telling the what bear with me
one second. Okay. Minister, you know you know
No one believes us anymore. He can't even
stomach this because it's like, just stop. Just
stop, man. We know. We know. We know.
Just give me something, like, you can't keep
pretending with this many civilian deaths that it's
just all of them hiding behind Hamas. And
the Hezbollah overlap is such a flimsy argument.
So the reality is they are killing. I'll
get to it. A lot. Wait until we
get the full picture of even Lebanon. It's
horrific what they're doing. They're bombing full apartment
buildings full of civilians in the middle of
the night. It keeps happening. I'll show you
in a second.
But this guy's like, man, just come on,
really?
How is the how is it possible Donald
Trump can reinitiate
2,000 pound bombs when all they're doing is
bombing dirt and destroyed areas and civilians in
tents?
Give me a second. You know, minister
I mean, you have to explain that comment
a little bit further. That is
outrageous to say.
Tens of thousands of innocent people have died
as a result of Israel's war in Gaza.
You know that? We've told them to move
to shy away from the from the terrorists.
No. You haven't. I mean, you've said that,
but then you bomb where they are, where
they're going, and on the way. Over and
over and over from every angle, including human
rights groups and UN and local people, even
Israelis.
I've pointed this out.
Foreign
activists
are pointing this out. They're deliberately remember, the
first few days Egypt broke the story that
they were bombing the crossing and bombing where
they went in the safe zone.
Day 1, this started because it's always been
a genocide.
And with all due respect, how can every
proportion of the ratio in the world How
do you history. We what are the best
ratios of war? How do you think history
will remember this war given the amount of
civilian
casualties. What are you talking about? You know
how many civilians were killed in the 2nd
World War all over the Don't they love
to do that? Right? So if your genocide
is okay, my genocide is okay. It's like,
what are you talking about? And on top
of that, realize that anybody with a brain
is not pretending like we didn't watch them
murder a bunch of people for their own
agenda.
Just because there was no accountability back then
does not change the reality of what you're
doing. They're just so desperate to hide their
own genocide.
Remember, guys, the US government dropped those nuclear
bombs after
Japan was already in retreat.
It is one of the easiest things to
prove about this conversation. They did it the
the conversation of why is debatable, whether it
was about threat to Russia or just to
see what happened. But you can prove it.
They did it even though they were about
to win anyway.
That's the truth that the government we're dealing
with, guys, and it's not new. With all
due respect, that's unfair. And that's a this
is not fair. Look at the real numbers.
The real numbers to demonstrate
that relative to any other war that any
western world had
in civil
ecosystems like we had, it's it's the the
the the smallest ratio. No. He's lying. That's
a flat out lie, first of all. Secondly,
what they're doing, even if comparable to other
wars, does not make it okay. Casualties relative
to to terrorists. And nobody had such experience
like this one does.
Children. It's very unfortunate and we we don't
want anybody
innocent to die. Schools,
hospitals.
All of them. The infrastructures
of terror. God. That's just lazy. That's the
best they can do. Infrastructure of terror? You
mean, like, Shefa that was embarrassingly proven? I
mean, I don't even need to make these
arguments, guys. The only people that are pretending
this isn't clear are the liars and the
deceivers and the and the cop the compromised.
Ross Greer says, Israel well, first of all,
this guy says Sharia Ben Ephraim says, with
the war over, which it's not, it's time
to take a talk about, talk, I think,
amen, about why Israel's lost the information war,
which by the way I said in the
1st week, and I still stand by it.
Our hasbar- our Hasbara, that's their propaganda. In
other cases, they pretend as a fake anti
Semitic word, even though that's the real word
for what their propaganda is.
Our enemies accused us of hating Palestinians, they
did. Committing war crimes, they were. And disregarding
international law, which they were. Our biggest accounts
and spokespeople spent vast amounts of money and
thousands of hours proving them right
by demonizing Palestinian international law. Why did we
put so much effort into showcasing our worst
sides? That's who they are. Not every Israeli
or every Jew, but the Zionist constructure is
absolutely that. It says, it's like we were
working for the other side.
Well, as Ross says, Israel lost the information
war because you committed genocide, and your soldiers,
politicians,
journalists, and influencers
posted all of it online in the media.
Want a better information, international representation?
Stop shooting toddlers in the head and raping
hostages to death.
Yeah.
Exactly.
Well, to the come to the point of
Gaza in general, realize that as I said
in the beginning,
Trump has already just argued that we need
to just displace all the Palestinians.
So it is the biggest I told you
so of the entire conversation.
This is what all of us said would
happen and everybody said would never come to
pass because you're a racist person. You just
hated well, here we are.
Just as expected.
The literal definition of ethnic cleansing. And realized
they floated the idea of the island, they
floated the idea of all these different things.
And every time we said, see? They just
wanna displace them all. Oh, we just wanna
have them. No. And then they went on
to destruct ever deconstruct everything.
Rip the roads out, tear burn everything down,
tear but we're still not pretending. We're still
looking around it, going, well, they're looking for
Hamas. Right. Were they underneath the pavement? Is
that what we're talking about? Like, it's just
so transparent.
And isn't it what Israel swore
would never be what happens or the US
government said we were racist for even suggesting?
Well, Donald Trump says he's pressing Jordan and
Egypt to take Palestinians in and full of
plans to just clean out the territory. Even
says it just clean out.
Sentiment cleansing is what it is. Also, by
the way, totally unconnected,
Jared Kushner's firm
is currently the largest owner of an Israeli
construction finance insurance company, building settlements in the
West Bank.
Meaning, that he's now directly aiding and abetting
war crimes under the Rome Statute and could
be liable for prosecution by the court, but
probably won't happen at all. But stands to
wildly profit and benefit from the rebuilding of
what they're gonna do when they bump them
all the way.
Weird how he was talking about beachfront property
in that clip. Yeah. They know what they're
doing.
Ryan Raspiani has the clip of when Trump
said this, so you can listen to it
for yourself. The whole Gaza Strip right now,
and it's a mess. It's a real mess.
You know? It's a mess because Israel bombed.
Jordan's a house. People my brother's to take
people.
I'd like, Egypt to take people. I'm meeting
with,
I'm talking to,
general LCC tomorrow, sometime I'm there.
And, I'd like Egypt to take people, and
I'd like Georgia to take people. I could
you're talking about
probably a minute and a half people,
and
we just clean out that whole thing.
Just clean out the whole thing. It's on
Air Force 1. That's why it's a bad
audio. But, I mean, how is it even
how is I mean, nobody's even engaging with
this like you should. Like, in the corporate
conversation. Like, my god. This is exactly what
you all pretend it was never on the
table.
And now Trump comes along and just floats
like it's a new idea,
exactly what we all said was coming?
Just like mRNA? Just like art I mean,
how my god?
They're not even trying apparently.
Well, just relocate them. Well, that's a crime,
but that's against the law. None of them
want to leave. But you're gonna frame it
as for their best interest because or like
voluntary
relocate. Well, that's what Smotrich calls it. Even
though he wants to kill them all, like
he just said.
Now Michael Tracey points out that cleaning out
the Palestinians from Gaza, I. E. Mass expulsions,
just like the original Nakba,
is the wet dream of hardcore Masonic elements
in Israel, like or also people like Hegseth.
Same thing. Who were supposed to have been
the most outraged
at the ceasefire? That's a well that's a
great point. Right? Because
that shows you I think they pretended.
Because they always knew, as I showed you,
as we'll get to, Trump made the agreement
that they knew this would happen. But so
they show they will damn you, the deal.
You're ruining everything. So then he, Trump, looks
like he's fighting the bad guy, Israel, but
really, that was always in the agreement.
So it's clear. Right? So the point is
the very same people who are screaming about
this are getting what they wanted while pretending
Trump is fighting their plans.
We're being played, guys. I think that's obvious.
This and then Shelley Talcott points out what
Trump said and kind of just has the
quote for you.
Justin Amash, in the same thing, says, Palestinians
in Gaza, like Palestinians in the West Bank
and Israel, overwhelmingly
trace their ancestry to the cities and villages
in the region that today
comprises Israel and Palestine.
The idea that they are some kind of
spillover from other countries in the so called
Arab world, that they are just interchangeable with
other Arabs, is a false but routinely employed
rhetorical
device to erase their history on land. And
also, right, disgustingly racist.
He says they are the descendants of the
Canaanites, Israelia, Israelites.
How do you say that one? The Fino
Phoenicians
and other ancient Levityne peoples.
Levitine?
Their ancestry overlaps with that of their Jewish
neighbors, but they are converts to Christianity,
Islam, and other religions.
Any effort to force them out or to
pressure them to leave under threat is forced
as simply ethnic cleansing.
Now, alternatively, if you wanna take a quick
dance around how many Israeli officials were trace
their ancestry to anywhere, but anywhere even near
the Middle East,
have fun with that. They'll call you racist
for it despite the fair the very same
argument reversed being claimed falsely about them.
So it's racist. If if it's racist, it
works both ways. But apparently, that's how it
works today. The reality is, like the Polish
leader of the country, that they're not actually
from where they claimed, that they took the
territory anyway.
And that's why the Orthodox Jewish communities around
the world are calling them out, saying this
is a bastardization of Judaism. They're lying about
this. The second coming is not here. Jesus
did or rather in the context of the
go there. The God God did not give
them that land. That that was the British
government.
So how could it be God? It's it's
obvious, guys.
Andrew Fox, of course,
Zionist, Israel supporter, supports the genocide. It's astonishing
that relocation of Gazans is now being incredibly
discussed. What a failure of Palestinianism.
Palestinianism.
How in the world is it a failure
of Palestinians
for the people who care not for what
they want to push that on them?
Why? Because this is a guy who has
an interest in making everything about Palestine bad
and everything is real good. He says, decline
every reasonable peace deal, decline every Tuesday none
of that happened.
None of it. Every single time. I see
this guy has an interest in selling you
the false narrative.
Like, the 35 100 year history. They're lying
to you. The reality is, just like we
can show next, they've always taken these deals,
like they did on October 9th 10th, like
they did well before that. David Smith made
a great point about this in the past.
I mean, the evidence is clear.
Every time you can prove that they and,
again, this is the point about the information
that he pretends isn't there. The clips of
Netanyahu laughing about how he made sure the
Oz that the the, Oslo course, for example,
where it's so many poison pills, they would
never accept it and blame them for not.
Or so far this October 7th forward.
Making sure Ben Gavir just glowingly told you
that he made sure it wouldn't happen. Netanyahu
was caught for that multiple times. So it's
still their fault that they made sure the
deal wouldn't happen? Or that Netanyahu's on the
record by saying we'll fund Hamas to make
sure that they never are allowed a 2
state solution?
Andrew Fox knows all of this. He's a
liar. And he goes on to say, faking
these things, decline every deal, decline every 2
state solution,
launch intifadas and rape murder pogroms.
See? Atrocity propaganda to this day. And vow
to destroy your neighbors.
The result is you push people into thinking
these extremes are the only solution left on
the table. No. That's Israel you're talking about.
That's what they do. Their atrocities, their actions
on October 7th could end up hurting Gazans
even more. My god.
The fake reality these people live in, which,
by the way, I'm of the mind that
they know they're lying, which is even more
detestable.
You're just making stuff up because apparently you
enjoy raping and murdering and torturing innocent people
while pretending they're the bad guy, which as
I've always said, is the worst of the
worst.
Right? Not just being the bad guy, but
pretending you're the good guy while raping, mortuary,
and torturing, or at least enjoying people that
are doing that, cheering them on while they
are.
Suppressed news points out, Jordan's foreign minister responds
to Trump's statements, saying, we reject the displacement
of Palestinian. This is our firm stance. You
know what? I'm not really feeling positive about
Jordan's claim to firm stances.
Seeing as how they already claimed that anything
in the West Bank was a red line,
where are they?
So I think it's hollow words, quite frankly.
I think that's been clear from the beginning.
But nonetheless, they're saying, don't do that, Trump.
How much you wanna bet it happened anyway?
And how much you wanna bet, they do
nothing about it. I hope I'm wrong.
Solon Solomon Ahmed
points out what how what Hamas said in
response
to what Trump said. He said, the Palestinian
people have stood steadfast in the face of
the most heinous acts of genocide in modern
times, carried out by the fascist Zionist occupation
army, have refused to surrender to the crimes
of forced displacement particularly
in the northern Gaza Strip.
Our people categorically
reject any plans for their expulsion and displacement
of their land, which, by the way, backed
up by pretty much every video you could
find of Palestinians on the ground.
We call on the US administration to cease
these proposals which align with Israeli plans and
directly contradict the rights and free will of
our people.
It says instead, the US should work towards
empowering the Palestinian people to achieve their freedom,
establish
their independent state, which Jerusalem has its capital,
which, by the way, was the original agreement
that Israel made sure would never happen, and
exert pressure on the criminal occupation to ex
expedite
the reconstruction of what was destroyed during its
brutal war on Gaza Strip, restoring normal life
to the area.
We also call on Arab and Islamic countries,
especially our brothers in Egypt and Jordan, to
reaffirm
their steadfast positions
in rejecting
displacement and expulsion, which they stated, but don't
think it'll happen.
We urge them to provide all forms of
support for our people, strengthening their resilience and
steadfastness.
And then it ends with saying, to remove
the effects of these fascist aggression inflicted upon
the Gaza Strip.
Now Maria za Zavzin from,
Crisis
Group, journalist, points out, it's worth remembering that
Blinken went to Sisi,
Egypt,
at the beginning of the at the, you
know, post October 7th ver arm of the
Israeli genocide of Gaza, goes back 76 years,
to float the same idea.
Offering Egypt money to take Palestinians. We talked
about it then. Remember?
Here we are again. President of the United
States explicitly calls for ethnic cleansing.
It shouldn't be so is are we supposed
to pretend that left and right are different
here? Right? Blinkin' of Biden, forcing the same
idea, Trump comes into power in a totally
different way forces the exact same outcome?
The only common factor is Israeli influence.
And here is what's happening on the ground.
Now the I'm not sure this has been
the reality of what's going on to people
in the West Bank and everywhere you're looking
in this conversation.
In places all around the world, by the
way. Even in Lebanon, in locations that they've
manipulated right now are already bulldozing. They're already
tearing things. This is happening all over because
this is the Great Rosier Project. She says
Palestinian woman defends her home against an Israeli
bulldozer.
Knowing how one of these ran over American
activist, Rachel Cory, this was harrying to watch.
American government didn't care about her either, by
the way. What you can see is this
woman is the courage it takes. Look at
her.
Because they're trying to tear down her home.
Happens every day.
And she's trying to stop them. But sadly,
well, she says we don't know what happens
because it clips off. I'm willing to bet
you she probably didn't make it.
But here, on that same note,
Israeli soldier, and this is news from the
22nd, and rabbi,
boasted about destroying buildings while serving in Gaza.
Remember, the whole game is there's only more
they only tore them down or blew them
up because there were bad guys there. Because
the reality is, if they did go in
and plant explosives, then they then blowing it
up becomes a crime because there was no
reason to blow it up. That's infrastructure.
Right?
It's that transparently obvious. All the videos of
them laughing and smoking cigarettes or they explode
bombs, they're they're destroying infrastructure. They know it,
they're laughing about it, And they'll tell you
in their interviews. But your government and your
media lies to you about it.
Here he is on his show telling you
about how he destroyed homes because they're just
they hate Palestinians.
And he call they call him the hero
of Israel.
The level the leveler of Jabaliyah, as they
called him. And he goes, and they say
the Palestinian society is evil.
They're literally cheering this guy on, a rabbi,
by the way. Pretty sure you're not a
man of God when you're enjoying the suffering
of other people. Just just gonna put that
out.
Here is another article
coverage of this. And this is Rami Abdul
from the human rights their EuromED human rights
group. Horrifying and appalling, an Israeli officer and
bulldozer operator brags before cheering an audience
about demolishing 50 to 60 residential buildings every
week.
Proudly claims to completely destroy Rafa and Jabaliya.
I said textbook
ethnic cleansing.
Openly admitted to and cheered on
by Israeli TV.
Here is Smotrich
saying
Israeli forces would soon erase the smiles of
the Palestinians in Gaza again,
calling them an anti Semitic society.
This is the reality of who we're dealing
with.
Very soon, we will raise the smiles,
raise their smiles again.
Are we really gonna try to pretend he's
only talking about Hamas? You damn well know
that's not true.
These are monsters
who want to see everybody dead.
That's who we're dealing with.
And here is what they do.
1 of the children that was allowed to
begin to cheer when they pretended the ceasefire
was starting, gave them 30 minutes to feel
like it had happened, and then when they
started shearing, they bombed them. And even Israel
admitted to this because they claimed they didn't
give them a certain list in time.
She celebrated the ceasefire.
That's what's going on.
Now, decentered news, you know, in in time
for time, I kinda figured we'd get this
is later in the show.
I'll include this. Make sure you check it
out. He did a great job on this.
They sent it news.
Trump molding long term mass displacement of Palestinians
from Gaza after approving 2,000 pound bombs for
Israel. And he does a great job breaking
it down. There's a lot of good information
here going over, you know, the waterfront property
claims, which is what Kushner was floating. They're
clearly going to like, for all the Republicans
that can't stop rightfully calling out the issues
with land grabs around Lahaina,
amazing how few of them care about this
going on in Gaza.
Make sure you point that out.
Ethnic cleansing, a lot of source material. It's
a well done article.
Now,
I guess, ultimately
what do we appoint? The point is ultimately
to highlight here the ceasefire breakdown.
Now we talked about this going back a
long way. May 7, 2024. Hamas agrees to
cease fire Israel attacks Rafa in response.
We knew this was blanket pretending and they
bombed they pretended like we they broke something
and they bombed Rafa anyway. That's all that
happened and and it's proven at this point,
even by Israeli media, even by Israelis on
the ground, that they broke the deal because
they didn't want it to happen. Smotrich Ben
Gavir, they've all they've owned this. Even Netanyahu
has they basically publicly said that.
This was another one after it. Israel once
again refuses its own ceasefire deal after Hamas
accepts.
And this is as the are the ones
from today. Now January 15th was before it
even started.
My point was, and again, the myth missing
ethics pledge is that no one seems to
care about, and I think it's because Israel
is influencing who we're talking about, and your
whole government knows that, but says the new
ceasefire agreement that Israel already plans to break.
And here we are. Funny how I knew
that, but, guys, anybody could've seen this coming
if they were paying attention. On top of
that, on 21st,
Israel had repeatedly violated the ceasefire. So let's
go into what actually happened here. Now I
wanna show you that Ryan Raspbiani was breaking
this down with video evidence
from the second day forward.
That everybody he he's one of a countless
amount of people that are proving to you
that they're blatantly violating the ceasefire, just like
they've been doing in Lebanon since day 1.
And now they've violated because they were supposed
to pull out by, I think, today or
yesterday, and they still haven't because they don't
have any intentions to.
He says, yes. They broke the ceasefire on
day 2. They killed 19 Palestinians after the
ceasefire deal took effect on 19th.
18 year old killed by a sniper.
Day 3. Palestinian man was shot and killed
by Israeli occupation forces in Shabura camp located
in Rafa.
Every day, guys. And it's they don't care.
It's public.
And you don't see people if you saw
any example in reverse, they would the world
would scream, my ass broke a foot. But
they're saying that anyway, by the way. We'll
get to that, about the Bebas family.
Day 4, a sniper shot a 18 month
old baby right in front of his mother.
We pointed to this. No one's talking about
it. Because you're not supposed they're they're we're
supposed to pretend like the ceasefire work because
that's good for Trump, so we're all gonna
ignore it. Right?
Day 7. Now he's gone through every day.
Open heavy gunfire on tens of thousands of
Palestinians while they were waiting to return to
their homes.
Day 8. Open fire on people waiting to
return to know the Gaza. Oh, actually, I
think the other one was different.
This one was
waiting at Nosarat Hill to go back to
north. The same same kinda point. And this
was the next day when they were waiting
to return to northern Gaza, and a child
was shot.
Very public. Now here's where I think the
most important point is here, in the context
of the ceasefire.
We've been talking about this for a very
long time.
Here's what he said. This is what's his
name? I don't know. Mister there is a
list. Daniel Hagori or something like that. Israel
accuses Hamas of violating the hostage deal.
Now it's interesting how little attention this got.
Hamas
failed to meet its obligations
to first release Israeli female civilian hostages as
part of the agreement.
We are determined to return
to the return of our Bel Yahud, an
Israeli citizen
kidnapped from near us,
and also
Shireh Bivas and her 2 children, Kfir and
Ariel,
whose welfare
we are extremely concerned about.
Okay. So there you have it. Just as
we expected, this was gonna become a a
point of contention that they used to argue
Hamas is violating something. Even though, as we'll
get into,
the father publicly stated they were killed by
IDF bombs.
Now, again, the first point here, Hamas did
not abide by the obligation to deal to
in the deal to free civilian women first.
It says, the deal released female soldiers before
civilian women.
And somebody rightly points out, oh, so now
they're soldiers. Right? Before, there were innocent girls.
Right?
Just as always, Israeli propaganda just will throw
it all at the wall and whatever works.
Right? We'll lie we'll just the point is
they were screaming these were innocent hostages. Well,
if they were soldiers, then they weren't hostages.
But you already know this if you're not
a moron because it's obvious.
And here's where we get into the family.
So they this is what we keep seeing.
Where are they?
I mean, which is this is a sad
story, guys, because they shouldn't have been taken
in the first place. And I I'm of
the mind here that based on what we've
already seen, it seems logical
that however this happened, it was not the
objective of Hamas. Because in every other case
we're gonna show you, and every other case
so far,
every single one of these people, say for
one that later changed their story, has been
clear. They treated us kindly. Same with the
ones they just released.
They were they they gave us what we
needed. They're clearly well fed.
So my point is, I think what happened
was these people got taken by some element
of this and that they just owned it.
I said, well, they're here now. They're gonna
blame us either way. So and I think
what happened was they got killed by IDF
bombs. So exactly like Shani Luke, by the
way. Who I I'm
I I I set I still say that
they were deliberate.
Based on everything we know, the people shot
in Gaza that BBC covered where they knew
they were hostages and they shot them point
blank. And one of them 15 minutes later
after he was pleading with them not to
shoot him.
That's the this is the story we bring
up every time about this. And just because
I know that some people met may not
heard that, might find that hard to believe,
it's,
right here for you to read.
Hostages shot by the IDF after holding an
SOS sign in the article, one of them
15 minutes after the other one.
After he literally was saying, don't shoot me.
I'm not and they killed him anyway. It's
the Hannibal Directive, guys. I'm convinced of this.
My point is that Shani Luke, for example,
as we now found out because her parents
even relayed this, that the people that had
her in the truck took her to the
hospital.
Yes. People were spitting and all. Yes. I
I can't we can't account for every individual
action in any context.
The point is that what happened, and in
all the videos that we've later seen, Hamas
was making sure people weren't being messed with,
in including the the video of her. As
they cover I mean, it was very clear.
So what happened is they took Shauna Luke
to the hospital
and then that hospital got bombed by Israel.
Like, we proved it on the show. Now
whether she was there,
that's for debate. The timing seems to be
pretty exact. And I think that that like,
whether it was delivered or not, these people
later got killed. And then that becomes the
interest of them to claim Hamas killed them,
like they've done over and over. Even though
many hostages have already proven, like Yasmin Porat
on October 7th all the way to today,
that they've watched the IDF bombs kill hostages
in Gaza and on October 7th.
It's documented by herets, by Israelis, by hostages
themselves.
So here we are with the point that
they're knowingly being told
because the father
admitted this, right there,
that they were killed by IDF bombs. Now,
yes, obviously, he could've been forced to say
that. But point stands that every one of
them that's made these videos while in cu
while in in under the control of Hamas
and Gaza
have come back and maintained what they said.
So why would we assume otherwise now? Now,
obviously, it could be, but that's the same
as before. You could lean into what you
want it to be verse and ignore all
the evidence.
I tend to side with the evidence. And
so my point is everyone's been pointing this
out. My I've been I've been posting it
under all of them, the Aviva Klompas and
all the people that are constantly using them.
Elon Levy.
So they know, and they know because it's
a public story. And now it's come to
pass where they're now claiming that them not
being returned
is a violation of the ceasefire.
And here we have them going, where are
they? Because it became a huge propaganda push.
Max Egan says Israeli forces bombed them long
ago. It's already been confirmed.
Now this is where Mohammed Shehadeh points something
out that really that he sees the same
thing. He says there's a concerted Israeli campaign
to blow up the ceasefire by weaponizing the
Biba's family.
Israelis know that their kids and their mom
were killed in IDF air strikes in November
20 23. Senior Israeli officials admit it behind
closed doors.
They keep pretending to not know the fate
of the family in order to later pretend
to be shocked and traumatized when the bodies
are returned. The reason the Beavers bodies haven't
been returned till now is that Netanyahu refused
to take them in December 2023.
I made this point then, if you remember.
How I I it's just so crazy how
far ahead we could be on some of
these things. And this was my opinion based
on the evidence.
And even then still, you could argue that
he shares the opinion and we're both wrong.
But remember, when that last time came, it
was one of the earliest deals,
the first time they had the pause, and
what did they claim? That they tried to
return these bodies and there was a whole
dick issue and that was what caused the
thing to break. Remember? It It was the
Biba's family. That was the claim. And they
didn't want it returned because they were continuing
to use them for this propaganda campaign.
You remember, guys, if you watch this show,
you remember I was really harping on it
at the time, and nobody really talked about
it.
It says in the ceasefire deal, Israel demanded
that is living hostages be released before dead
bodies. So the Bebas remains won't be returned
until the very end of the phase, per
Israel's demand. Remember this when the time comes
and Israeli propagandists pretend to be shocked and
enraged in order to blow up the deal.
The point he's making is not only do
they know this, but on top of it,
they've made sure that they demanded the dead
bodies be returned at the end of the
process.
So once we get to the end of
that process, if we even get there, which
I doubt we will, they're gonna they would
be knowing we're at the point where that
would be where the bodies come, as opposed
to living people.
And his argument is they're still gonna go,
what? They're dead. Like, pretending. And that that's
I because I think all of this is
very clear.
And here is Sheryl Lee saying, all the
world leaders including president Trump and her own
PM Netanyahu, if anything's happened to the Beavis
family and we find out they've been killed
by Hamas, all hell will break loose.
It's just so contrived.
They're gonna blame it on Hamas no matter
what. That's been the plan.
Israel officials here admit that Hamas offered to
return Jordan Bivas, Kieffer's, Kaffir's father, and the
bodies of his family on humanitarian grounds in
December 2023.
Right? When's the last time Israel offered to
do anything on the humanitarian grounds?
Jordan Bivas could have been returned on home
her home on humanitarian grounds.
I think I have that right here too.
Or I thought I did.
Anyway, the points point same point. So I
find that to be very oh, wait. Let
me play this,
I I don't have to play the I'll
I'll play the clip and and show you
just the
it's it's sad. Right? So this is it's
it's heartbreaking. Right? This is a man who
lost his family
and he's telling the world that it was
IDF bombs that killed them.
Now for more of the point for those
that, you know, rightly so, what I mean,
this is the,
where is it? Right here.
This one. This has the subtitles.
And I mean, just as always, confirm this
for yourself guys. It's not my just it's
it's very clear.
But it says
Netanyahu, you bombed and killed my wife and
my 2 children, who were the most important
things in my life. Bring them back home
so they can be buried in Israel. Now
that's when they refused to take them, guys.
Very clear how disgusting all this is. And
how and, you know, as I said with
the rape conversation, damn you for making me
have to make this point. Damn you for
denying the reality of what you did, these
people, so I have to be the one
that steps in and goes, you're lying about
killing children. You know, it's disgusting. Like, this
has been how do we not see by
now that this is who this Zionist government
is? Everything they've done has been continually in
the same dark, disgusting vein of, like, subhuman
direction. And it's not about Jews or Israelis.
It's about specifically Zionism on what ever side
of this comes into play. It is the
worst of human everything, in my opinion.
Here.
Dan Cohen also highlights in reporting on the
deaths of the Bibas family, CBS is forced
to acknowledge they were killed by Israeli air
strikes.
So mark my words, guys. This is going
to be used to explode this deal.
I feel like there's been too much build
up for it not.
Now, here's Elon Levy
before till 24th. A 1000000 views, by the
way. Saying, this is Naamah Levi.
She's a peace activist. No, she's not. She's
a she's she's a soldier. So he was
just trying to get one more desperate lie
in right before it happened, even though he
knew that we would find out.
That's I think about how ridiculous that is.
He says the Hamas rapist regime. That's his
own stupid little tagline despite how clearly it's
been proven that they are raping people and
blame it's just it's the whole thing's imploded
in their face. Or exploded in their face.
And it says expected to free her tomorrow.
When it is when it abducted her, she
begged them freedom, basically, the video, saying I
have friends in Palestine and, you know, whatever.
So here's what happened.
Oh, hold on one more. So first of
all, back to the soldiers point. Arson Ostrovsky
says, f you, New York Times. Why? Because
it says Hamas handed over 4 female Israeli
soldiers, and Israel was expected to free about
200 Palestinians.
By by the way, that's factually correct. Even
Hagari
made the point that the reason they violated
the deal is because they released
soldiers, which is the case. And not civilians.
Because he was trying to make it about
the Bebas family.
But here's arson, which I guess they haven't
shared notes apparently, and says, f you, New
York Times. Four Israeli girls, hostages, were taken
from their sleep in their pajamas. He's lying.
He knows he's
lying. First of all, 4 female soldiers.
Now curse Kurt certainly could've been taken out
of their beds, but they're soldiers. They're not
hostages. That would by default, they're soldiers, which
makes them detainees or POWs in a context
of war. But it says to be freed
Saturday.
And here
oh, wait. Let me just jump to it.
This one.
Here's one of them. That's one of the
girls we're talking about.
It says, Luri alb Albag
was taken captive by Hamas
from the IDF surveillance unit,
Nalaz army base.
Oops. Now let's remember when this was taking
place. Now there was these people were the
ones that were reportedly in those things that
were reporting this and being ignored.
So just realize, these people are desperately trying
to lie to you as the world sees
right through this. Now here's another crazy way
this is being presented. Of course, by one
of the most
just
idiotic, lying, constantly flailing about about this story,
Henma Zig, one of the many.
But then, Mariana Mendiv, one of the others,
shares the same thing, and it just shows
them getting out.
Now what's funny is they're showing look at
this. Here they are going, hi. Thumbs up.
Heart shape.
They must be traumatized. Right? I mean, it's
just crazy. For the podcast, they're literally happy.
Look at them.
Yay. Whoo. Heart shape.
Because I mean, that's not something that happens
when you leave a Israeli torture prison, when
you're emaciated and holes burned in your leg
and broken arm Yeah. Obviously.
You're you're suffering. You're traumatized. These are people
that have been treated well. Like every other
one of them that's come out so far.
As their as the I'll show you saying
themselves.
But here's the best you get from this.
She goes, the Israeli girls were returned from
Gaza in green uniforms. Yeah. Their uniforms. And
it says, they were taken in pajamas.
Well, I can't verify that. I I I
don't know. The bottom line is,
these are Israeli uniforms that were given to
soldiers so that when they get released,
they're not as I'll I'll show I'll show
you next what the guy says. Like, they're
not being embarrassed.
Or, like, they're being
like,
who in what world were you gonna see
Israel treat their hostages like this? Or their
detainees? Or their prisoners?
And it's the point is, everything is a
lie and a spectacle, they say. Now here's
what it says. Notice their smiles.
They are drugged.
They've tried to put this flimsy claim out
last time that was very quickly proven to
be false. And it says, Hamas injects all
of returning hostages with a cocktail of narcotics.
Guys, this is about the dumbest thing.
They have all continued
to maintain their stories.
So are you gonna address that? Or so
they were drugged and they said the truth
and then they maintained the truth? So what
then it's irrelevant.
They're trying to make you think that they're
lying or that they're not happy. That they're
all raped and horrified, and they're just smiling
because they gave some that narcotics.
I just can't believe that anybody thinks this.
I mean, this is not only, like,
absurd,
but it's disgusting.
These are their people that they're making that
they're lying about.
Evidence of drugging was collected from prior hostages.
No. That was the Times of Israel making
the claim of 1 person that lied about
that, and it was roundly shown to not
be backed up by the reality.
Here, Muhammad
Shehada points out, reminder, all 4 Israelis who
were released tomorrow will be will be soldiers,
not civilians.
Most Palestinians who'll be released are civilian hostages,
kidnapped illegally without charges as I've already shown
you.
Now this person says, and this is where
it gets especially ridiculous
oh, wait. Actually
oh, hold on. I'll come back to that
since I wanna it's gonna I'll show it
over here. This guy says, I have a
horrible theory.
What if they were impregnated,
gave birth,
and now released without their babies?
And now Hamas is blackmailing with the babies
for telling the world what happened.
I think you and q q one on
Republicans are gonna have a good time together.
Like, that's guys, anything's possible. But if you
have to start manufacturing grandiose possibilities just to
kinda make sense of why nothing happened to
them and they seem okay now I'm not
talking about being taken and how terrifying that
would be. But the reality that they were
taken and kept fed and healthy and safe
in a place where no Palestinians had that
reality.
Think about that.
And this is what you make up? You
are the sick, disgusting person that's forcing this
terrible narrative on the people that had that
not happen to them because that's what you
would do. That's what I think.
And ham and Elon Levy,
this is the best response he can he
says, Hamas are psychopaths.
Our hostages are heroines.
Okay.
That's the best you can do? Look at
these guys. Look at them.
Guys, okay. Before you even watch it, this
this is like a sporting event. Literally, these
girls are acting like they just won something.
Look at them.
Hands in the air,
cheering, waving.
What world are we watching right now? What
the hell is going on?
They're all smiling. They're cheering. Like, this is
why they're so desperate to pretend they're drugged
because this doesn't make sense with what they've
all been told.
And now they come home and tell you,
as I'll show you next, they were kind.
This person says thankful for a ceasefire and
these girls going home. Interesting how none of
them are pregnant.
Elon lied and tweeted thoughts from his own
perverted mind to keep the war going. Airstrikes
he knew were killing Israeli captives.
A true psychopath. Here he is going, I'm
going to be blunt because I'm at my
wits end with hostages still trapped in Hamas
terror dungeons.
No. No. None of them at all. Apparently,
were tortured at all. But Israel has been
proven to be doing that. As always. He
goes, we know Hamas is raping hostages. No.
You don't. It's not happening. Zero evidence from
October 7th or to this very point.
According to even a recent follow-up from Israeli
media,
they reported they said there were 0 accounts
from October 7th of rape according to their
own forensic. Not testimony they they never collected
forensics, which was huge and obviously showed what
they were trying to cover up. But now
it came out, there was no reports.
But it says they've been there for some
64 days. If they're pregnant, it's week 23.
And don't forget, even Matt Miller floated this
idea and got called out for it. But
here we are. Like they're like they're the
winners of some sport some some sporting event.
I mean, really, it's absolutely mind blowing to
me that this is what is being presented.
Now Kevin Bong just goes, who do you
stand with? Of course, gives you this picture
that shows does does not let them look
like soldiers and then makes Hamas look scary.
That's that's the best you can do right
now. Because anything else exposes that you're all
lying.
And this person says, what movies is this
from? He says, they graduated from Alkassim University
with goodie bags and certificates. I can't.
Guys, it is absolutely stupid.
They're I mean, yes, I get it that
they're making they're clearly Hamas is almost making
fun because they know they're not doing what
they're claiming they are. But they look. They've
got little baggies and goodies and the point
is, yes. You could make all that up
and they could be tortured. But they're not.
They're laughing and smiling and everyone before,
and now that they're out, have maintained that
they weren't.
Now, here's what BBC does because this is
the kind of game they have to play.
Otherwise, people find out the truth.
Hostages versus prisoners.
Well, there have been rallies throughout the evening
here in Tel Aviv celebrating the release of
these
4 more hostages and celebrations too on the
Palestinian
side
with the release of those prisoners. But fresh
accusations and fresh delays just highlight how It's
it's disgustingly stupid. Right?
So they're the prisoners while being children without
charge, but over here they're hostages while they're
pre while they're soldiers.
And that's the reality because they just admitted.
It's crazy.
You think they don't know what they're doing?
Now here's here's the this is the, again,
the best they can do.
So it says, they took them to the
sea and taught them the Abu obedient hand
gesture.
That's this guy. Look, Elon Levy. Israeli hostages
forced to perform the Hamas,
kill all the Jews, finger of terror gesture.
Are you
I mean, it's almost like he's actually making
fun of himself at this point. Like, is
I can't take that seriously.
They have a finger in the air. And
realize this comes from the video
right here,
where they're not they're
look look at this. Oh, wait. Did I
pass it?
Hold on. There it is.
Look. This is what they're trying to pretend.
They're they're not they're not doing anything.
I mean, I mean, even if you think
that's maybe it isn't Palestine anything. Like, look
at the way he's framing this.
Forced to perform the Hamas, kill all the
Jews, finger of terror gesture before they release.
I mean, I just don't even understand. This
is the kind of thing like, this is
what we would make fun of in any
context. If this was a Saturday Night Live
skit, we would laugh.
The the the kill all the Jews finger
of terror gesture? I mean, they've lost the
plot, guys. They've lost.
Period.
Words cannot describe the horror they have endured.
Yeah. They can. It's called being treated kindly,
being fed,
not raped, not tortured.
Words can definitely describe it. What words are
hard to describe is what you're doing to
people and children in your prisons, and that's
exactly what you're actually doing. You're highlighting that
by
projecting onto somebody else.
And then as Tiberius points out, compare and
contrast. This is from July 2023.
Stripped, beaten, and blindfolded.
New research reveals ongoing violence and abuse of
Palestinian children detained by Israeli military.
July
2023.
But, yeah, but the terror finger gesture. My
god. Let's all be terrified.
They're ins it's insulting. Like, they're making fun
of us, guys, at this point. It makes
me sick. And here's what Dayeb Abu, Jahaj
points out or Jah Jah. No humiliation,
dignified and in their military uniform.
Right? That's how prisoners of war must be
treated under international law. He's right.
So Hamas seems to rec to respect international
law. At least they're pretending to publicly.
Israel doesn't even care to pretend.
It says, on the other hand, civilians, doctors,
journalists, women, and children are kidnapped and tortured
and raped in Israeli dungeons.
Is is anybody gonna even pretend that's not
true?
We've it's this been publicly defended by Israel.
And here they go, 477
days in hell, standing strong and proud and
tall despite everything.
They're laughing.
Waving.
And Max says these Israeli soldiers were taken
captive while enforcing the siege of Gaza. They
are standing strong, in quotes, because Hamas tended
to their needs despite Israeli bombardment, which killed
many other Israeli captives in Gaza. Meanwhile,
Israel has proudly tortured and starved civilians and
kidnaps from Gaza and just ends its probe
into its own soldiers raping male prisoners on
video.
An episode that generated pro rape riots across
Israel.
It's crazy.
And PBT has a thread here that I
thought was interesting. You can look through it
where it says how Hamas trolled Zionists today.
And it's actually hilarious. So right now, on
the little banner, it says Zionism will not
win. They had all these little images down
below where it showed the it says failure
failure failure of all the different Israeli leaders.
Like, I guarantee this really upset them. And
I think that's good because it's like they're
they're such petty individuals.
But the best they can do is make
it out to be something it's not. And,
just just so you're clear, do not miss
the point of how clear it is that
I that I'm that Israel has been funding
Hamas in some way or another
right up until October 7th. So we should
not take this as support for anything. I'm
still very much suspicious that any part of
this might still be influenced by Israel.
That doesn't mean that like, my point is
I think what's happening here is clearly in
the interest of Palestinian self determination.
But
I think there are still elements that might
be manipulated, like we've seen in the past.
Just worthy of consideration.
But here is the actual video.
It says Israeli female soldiers,
one of which was the central billboard of
the rape conversation, which turns out to not
be true. Surprise, surprise. But you already knew
this. That's why I didn't make that the
main story today. It's already been we we've
already heard all the they lied the entire
time about all of it.
But it says,
released today.
And they speak in Arabic
and say that they were treated well, given
food and water and clothes. They also thanked
Al Qasim for keeping them safe from Israel's
bombardment.
I
mean, guys, this is every time and every
one of them.
And then they go, they forced them to
speak in Arabic and they made them wear
these necklaces and they tortured them by making
them hold their fingers in the air.
I can't even I just like, I laugh
out loud.
It says, peace be upon you in Arabic.
And she says, thank you to Al Qasim
Brigades for the good treatment.
And this one back here says, thank you
for the food and water and clothes.
Thank you for the men who used it
to take care and look after us
and keep us safe from Israel bombardment is
what it says right there.
And this is the one that's the one
right there that was the the poster child
for the rape conversation. I'll show you next.
It says, good willing to
it, god, good, god willing, today will be
a happy day.
The best day.
And everyone is okay.
Today is the 25th of of January 2025.
But that that's it. That's what they want
you to believe are horrifying torture cases that
are traumatized, but they're drugged, so they don't
know. Right?
Well, again,
on the record, you could listen to these.
These are different videos and then somebody talked
about it.
Longer version. Israeli colonizer and and killer captives
left Gaza saying, the men refused to be
alone with us. They taught us to offer
food to others before they eat, which probably
we've heard that already. That.
They
used their bodies to protect us. They fed
us more than they ate.
These are backed up by many other examples
where they literally I think it was
I forget her name now, but they they
said she they literally covered us with their
bodies to protect us from Israeli bombs.
Unreal, isn't it?
Aviva Clampas
says,
the 4 female hostages were held captive together
and separated from Adam Berger.
They were kept both in tunnels and buildings
dressed like Palestinians and taught to speak Arabic.
Right. Remember the story they told you? Rape
and torture and but and this is supposed
to be the then you can hear the
dark music behind what it say. While in
captivity, they saw some media, mainly Al Jazeera.
Oh my gosh.
But it says the girl shared. Now, here's
what's interesting.
We just heard what they said.
We've heard what everyone of them said. And
weirdly, we get a different framing of it
when the media reports what they've said. For
example, the terrorists treated us humiliatingly and harshly.
She said. The same one we just heard
say they were very kind.
She was the one who spoke to the
terrorists who guarded them. Now the only place
I can find that is an Israeli media
article.
You just heard them speak and everyone heard
them speak publicly in multiple examples, and they
said the same thing every time. But Israeli
media and Nabi Blampas wants you to believe
that they were treated harshly. But let's just
even say that's the truth.
Did they say raped and tortured? No.
Partially and humiliatingly.
Well, I'd like to say that's a huge
deviation from what you shoved down our throats
for a year.
But even that turns out to be a
lie, it appears.
PBT
points out a previous example. This is Lipschitz.
One of the one of this is the
first one released. Apparently, she's followed up and
admitted
they offered to return her for nothing.
Israel said no.
Just like the Biba's family.
So Hamas said, we'll drop them off the
border. Which they did. And remember, that's how
it turned out. Where they just they pretended
they rescued her and then she admitted they
just dropped her off.
So Israel is so desperate for a win,
they had to lie about it.
And it says, this is how much Israel
cares about the hostages.
This is her saying it herself, guys. And
it says, this is the hostage who Hamas
released and Israel refused to accept, giving an
interview. And she's very clear that they treated
her kindly, and this upset everybody. Because there
this blew up the narrative in the very
first release.
That's why they didn't want her, guys. That's
why they've continued to try to kill everyone
they could. That's my belief, and I think
the evidence very clearly backs that up.
Now here, alternatively,
are one this is one of the hostages
released from the Israeli prisons.
It was immediately arrested again
in an immediate violation of the ceasefire. This
is exactly they pro explicitly promised not to
do just that. I read it directly from
their own agreement.
Israel was rearrested
Ashab Zig, Zigir
Zigir after raiding his home in Jerusalem. He'd
been released hours ago after spending over 2
decades in prison,
and you could see him celebrating with his
mom. His rearrest is a clear violation of
the agreement.
2 decades, guys. 2 decades.
Right? So think about the like most of
these people, they were arrested for some argument
and never charged with a crime.
Here's one that was released,
And here's the difference.
He got released. It was taken in 2015.
Released recently.
And that's what he has on his face
now. These things are very hard to disregard.
He was mutilated while in prison.
And that's what seems to be a common
reality if you listen to the UN, Human
Rights Watch, Amnesty, B'Tselem. You know, anybody that's
not dishonest.
Now on the point of the rape, which
I think is very important,
this is the one we've talked about. Right?
This whole story.
This one.
Remember that? All the women that dressed in
the pant the the gray pants with the
red butt. Remember that?
Hey. She apparently wasn't raped.
Surprise. Surprise.
And it turns out, just like we all
deduce based on the facts, that her ankle
was cut and she was sitting on her
ankle in the car and that's why she
had blood on her pants. But they didn't
care. Because it was all about selling you
on atrocity propaganda while they continue to rape
prisoners in Israel.
But as Max says, another nail in the
coffin of the Hamas mass rape hoax was
delivered today. It brings to a close one
of the first and main pillars of the
genocidal atrocity propaganda mass rape hoax,
Levi.
And that's the one they want there's a
peace act of it. No. She's a she's
a soldier. Right? Just like the others.
An Israeli Zionist occupation soldier who patrolled the
Gaza concentration camp is set to be released.
She became the main symbol of the mass
rape pokes, the bloody pants.
Not only was the lie exposed as a
lie,
it was shown that her that Israelis and
her family knew all along. The pants had
been bloodied soiled by her hands that were
tied behind her back. I argue also at
the ankle, but both at the same point.
On which she had been sitting before she
widely circulated video of the car of her
moving in the car.
They and they had the full video showing
her inside the building all along and intentionally
didn't release it to manufacture a fake symbol
for their mass rape hoax. This is the
kind of despicable,
sinister
actions we've been seeing from Israel from the
very beginning.
They all started wearing bloody pants, performing great
pokes. We all you saw all these guys.
It's crazy.
I don't even it's it's I don't I
don't even think it most people are even
shocked by this right now.
Remember all the accusations of how dare you
bring the well, the facts matter, didn't it?
And sure as hell matter now.
Now, all of it back around, sure glad
we were on the story right from the
beginning. Right?
Turns out the prisoners weren't raped and impregnated
by Hamas, as Israelis told us. They've been
lying to us to justify a genocide.
They point to the soil pants of the
soldier to claim rape. Her entire arrest was
captured on GoPros from military base to car.
The blood was from her wrist and ankle.
It's obvious.
And here's Bri Brianna Wu still trying to
force in the narrative because that's all they
have. She goes, this moment radicalized
me. Terrorists kidnapped a woman and raping her.
And utter silence and justification from the alleged
fem No. You're lying. Or you don't know
you're lying. And we've proven that's a lie
and you just don't care.
Thank god she goes free tomorrow.
And this person says, oh, Brianna. Here here
they are laughing, smiling.
But you already know the reality.
I believe it's on purpose. A representative from
Israel's health ministry says the 4 newly released
hostages are in an emotionally and medically complex
situation.
Oh, groundbreaking information. Thank you, Eva Klompas, for
your sourceless claim on Twitter.
Again,
because you can't steer this away.
They're laughing and smiling and thumbs up. I
show showed you right then. Look. Hey. Hooray.
Kinda hard to say that's emotionally traumatized. Right?
Well, let's just may maybe they are drugged.
Right? Certainly possible. Well, let's find out where
the claim comes from. Because seeing as how
Eva Klompas so kindly refused to give you
source material, we had to do our due
diligence. Because clearly she does not want you
to look into where these flimsy claims come
from. Oh, here's another one. Noah Berg, update.
The 4 newly released female hostages are in
an emotionally and medically complex situation per the
Israeli Health Ministry. Oh, gee. I wonder if
they have an interest in lying about their
ongoing fake story.
But oh, again. Well, great. No source material.
Thanks. I guess this image proves that. Right?
These people are deliberate liars, guys.
Let's find the article. Okay. Here's the new
one. This is from January 25th, 2025. Newly
freed hostages and emotionally and medically complex situation.
Okay? The same people that have always been
lying to you from the very beginning, who
have already been caught misrepresenting
every part of this story. The literal health
ministry has been caught over and over
are the ones telling you this now.
An emotionally and medically complex situation.
Well, there was no indication of that for
hours as they stood on stage and walked
to okay. Let's pretend though.
Speaking at this center, where 4 young women
arrived, he says it's privileged to to provide
them with treatment. The women will receive a
wide range of therapies designed to address both
physical and emotional needs. That doesn't prove that
they have any needs at all. That you
just do that to make the claim. But
it says, Today, we met them after this
many days of captivity. Here's what it says.
This is an emotionally and medically complex event
for hostages.
Okay.
Now comes the main point. Up until then,
they've been referring to what they were saying
with a quote,
sorta like people's voice, misrepresenting the reality. But
this is actually a quote, so even this
is not as bad as him. But the
point is, here's what the real quote is.
All the way at the bottom.
This is an emotionally and medically complex event
for hostages. For the hostages.
For their families. For the families of all
the hostages. Oh, I see. Yes. So in
a general sense, these situations can be medically
complex and and emotional.
You realize how grossly dishonest this all is?
It I can't stand how ridiculous this is.
That's the best they can do. As they
smile and tell you they were treated kindly,
they have to basically take out of context
what the guy said to make the argument.
But guess what's even more ridiculous, guys?
They made the same stupid claim
in the last time. This is November 2023.
I mean, the exact situation.
Oh, dang it. Hold on. I just hit
that button.
Oh, no. It didn't go. Okay. Here we
go.
Right there. Look at that. It's even the
title. A complex event, both medically and emotionally.
Oh, weird. The exact same phrase? Here it
says, this is in a complex event, both
medically and and emotionally
for the hostages who have returned to Israel
for their families and entire people of Israel.
Wait a minute.
Is that the exact same quote?
Verbatim?
Oh my god. And the entire people of
Israel. Hold on a second. So are they
really taking a quote
from 2023
and pretending he made the quote
for the girls today? Yes. They are.
You can't make up how stupid this is
and how gross it is to make a
an entirely fake narrative when they know we're
seeing through it just to try to barely
convince a few more people that maybe they
were abused
while they weren't.
Guys,
that's crazy obvious.
Just in case you're not seeing it, this
is an article from 2023
where they're quoting the same doctor saying the
exact same thing. So that means either he
said the exact word for word quote
a year and a half later,
or they just reposted the same quote and
took it out of context to argue that
they're manipulated, that they're emotionally complex.
Has I have I have I said desperate
in a while? Because my god if that's
not desperate.
Now, just to wrap up in general, guys
they're telling you, oh, I you know what?
I might come back because I think that's
a good place to wrap in general because
we're obviously long today. I never I 5
hours is even long for me, but I'll
go over more of the the UNRA aspect
of it because the point is they're basically
trying to create this dynamic where UNRA's the
bad guy, like always, except the reality is
2 over 2,400
aid trucks enter Gaza
in under this ceasefire.
And now they're already tapering it back down,
by the way. But the point is weird
how there was no looting. Isn't UNRA Hamas?
Are you telling us UNRA's been stealing it,
but now Israel's out of the picture for
the moment and UNRWAH's the one delivering food?
They've got more food than ever? Yeah. Every
nair every single lie they put forward is
being exposed.
Or the idea that Israel violates a ceasefire
and declares Israel won't displace cousins or won't
allow them back to the North.
Over and over, we've been showing you this.
They're taking the territory, and they're not allowing
them back to the North, which was also
part of the ceasefire.
I I Ivankalampus basically owning collective punishment, saying
now we won't let them back because of
this one person that's collective punishment.
All these people being pushed held back and
opened fire on as they try to go
back to the north,
which is what's happening,
in both Gaza, right here, and in Lebanon.
22 unarmed Lebanese civilians have been murdered by
Zionist occupation forces who opened fire on unarmed
civilians inside Lebanese territory. Now I'm gonna go
more into this since we're gonna kinda wrap
right here, but realize,
they're firing on Lebanese people also going back
to their homes.
At the same time, that is not unique
that is not
an accident.
It is what Israel's government does. And they're
murdering civilians wherever they are because they want
the territory and your governments are gaslighting for
them because they're also monsters. And Craig Murray
points out that they've even made a slip.
The the White House accidentally
said that they're gonna finalize the expansion.
They didn't mean expansion. They're not supposed to
say that out loud. Or maybe Trump wants
it to be claimed. The point is they're
telling you they're gonna finalize the expansion in
Lebanon.
Well, that's what we've been telling you because
that's the plan. That's against the law. Nobody
seems to care.
Zionist attacking in in people in Lebanon.
Zion's attacking people in the West Bank. It
BBC even did its own investigation proving that
only
6 people
out of 73
were even connected to Hezbollah.
The vast majority were children.
Even though Israel says they killed a bunch
of Hezbollah.
They murdered 23 children,
and even the BBC's admitted that now.
The West Bank,
also exploding right now.
They've launched Operation Iron
Wall in the West Bank.
They've cut the electricity
out the out from the West Bank.
It's just it's all going on right now,
guys. This heartbreaking video we'll we'll get into
is disgusting.
These are children
in a car in the West Bank being,
I think, killed.
Sanctions are being removed from terrorists.
A soldier shot a 2 year old girl
in the West Bank yesterday.
No one cares. That's her right there.
Israeli occupation has notified the residents
in Bethlehem
of its intention to demolish all their homes
and forcibly to place them. Displaced. And that's
today. Bethlehem.
Where are the Christians at, guys?
They're literally saying, just get out of the
way. We're gonna destroy everything you own.
There's no legal justification for this. It's illegal
no matter how you spin it. Trump made
this agreement.
He agreed as they told you. They're openly
telling you. He allowed them to do all
this, annexate the West Bank as long as
he got this momentary win, which it seems
they didn't even agree to that part. They
were supposed to wait till the second phase.
They just immediately break it all. I think
Trump's just pretending it's not happening so we
could pretend that they bet they're part of
the deal. But like always, they're abusing even
the US government.
They're telling him, we're gonna take everything.
We'll end with this, as Derek says,
you are powerful, you are beautiful, you are
free.
You are capable of self governance.
And that says the real poison is the
idea that you even need to be governed.
Hope that can resonate with some people.
I'll end with the clip I told you
about in regard to Net in Yahoo,
showing you really how obvious this has all
been, guys, from day 1. I mean, this
this is what this entity has been doing,
and it's been obvious. I'm hoping people are
just starting to finally truly see that. Now
as I said guys, please, long show today.
Break these clips out. Hopefully you've been taking
doing it the whole time. Sharing them on
Twitter. I'll go through and try to find
your tags and share them as best I
can. Just get the information out there. There's
so many different little parts about today that
are important that'll you know, that in in
if made in this perfectly packaged partisan way,
would be wildly viral that I don't see
anybody else talking about.
Break them out, get it out there, tag
me. Let's get the content out there. It's
just about making sure people see this when
it needs to be seen.
Thank you for your support, guys.
I I just I can't express enough how
much it means to me that you're here
to support this platform because we would not
exist without you.
Well,
I'm gonna be trying for a show tomorrow.
I believe I can make that happen.
I'm sure there will be some updates coming
soon about just other things going on that
are taking a lot of time away from
me. But I think at the end of
the day, guys,
I think we're making a difference.
I mean, I I believe that.
Truly.
I'm watching this thing change in front of
us. The scary thing is that the power
structure doesn't seem to care at all that
we see what they're doing. That's a whole
another animal to deal with. But right now,
again, it's important to recognize that, you know,
as we said with COVID, you're not alone.
Right? We see this. It's important that we
as a collective, as just the, you know,
the the American people or the world,
start acknowledging what these power structures really are.
As always, you can't really solve a problem
until you first acknowledge that it exists. And
right now, we're still battling that, at least
to some
degree. So thank you all for being here
and believing in us. I believe in you.
As always,
I love you all.
Question
everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
What terrorists do
is target the innocent deliberately.
Therefore, my definition of terrorism is the systematic
and deliberate attack. The murder, naming, and menacing
of innocent civilians.
Her name is Hinn Brijab, and she was
just 5 years old when she was killed
with her family trapped in a vehicle.
You can tell a lot about terrorists but
what happens when they come to power. They
end up as being masters of terrorist states.