Nobody will be safe
if not everybody is vaccinated.
Are you vaccinated, if I may ask? Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I'm very, like, pro
vaccination. I mean, we've, the science is unequivocal.
Can you imagine, sir, that in 10 years
when we are sitting here, we have an
implant in our,
brains,
and,
I can immediately feel because you all will
have implants. Just think of sensors
planted into our brains. Basically,
implanted in your skull. So
but it would be
flush with your skull. So you basically,
take out a chunk of skull, replace put
put the neurolink device in there. You you
put the the electrode you insert the electrode
threads very carefully into the the brain. It
doesn't change what you are doing. It changes
you if you take a genetic editing. It's
a fusion of
the physical, the digital,
and the biological world.
That's
really
the essence of the 4th industrial revolution. A
merger
with biological intelligence
and machine intelligence. An effort for man to
merge with machine in a healthy way. Yes.
To beat machines, you basically have to merge
with machines. Most likely. Yes. As work is
changing, is a universal basic income,
really a a a solution to the to
this problem? I I think, ultimately, we will
have to have some kind of universal basic
income, and I think some kind of a
universal basic basic income is gonna be necessary.
Decarbonization
of sea economy. Where are they traveling? How
are they traveling? What are they eating? What
are they consuming on the platform?
So individual
carbon footprint tracker.
Stay tuned. We don't have it operational yet,
but this is something that we're working on.
I mean, my top recommendation, honestly, would be
just to have a carbon tax.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent
news as we see it from the last
24 hours.
Thursday, January 23rd, 2025.
Thank you for joining me today. I have
a big show planned today.
So really gonna leave it very short to
start today for for I know a lot
of you really do love the long, especially
long shows for a show that's already quite
long. But as today, especially, I'm gonna keep
it brief because I don't want this to
be I'm really to be honest, I wanna
make sure I get to everything I have
today. And I, like anybody else, get tired
after quite a certain point. So in general,
as you can tell,
we're gonna be covering what's been happening over
the last couple of days. And I'm actually
really frustrated I wasn't able to get to
a show yesterday because that was something that
I kinda decided to put off the last
show. I I saw it toward the tail
end of when I was prepping because it
was just too much of a big topic
to add last minute, and I just wasn't
able, for a lot of reasons, to get
to a show yesterday, which was frustrating.
Because, I mean, of all things, this topic
is something, you know, we've been talking about
for a very long time.
Not just artificial intelligence, not just our, mRNA,
mod RNA,
but the obvious intersection between the two. And,
I mean, as Catherine, Austin Fitz is talking
about, the control grid. I mean, that's what
this is, guys. And let me put it
as simple as this. Even if that's not
what they think they're doing, that's how this
can be still applied.
And that terrifies me because of how obviously
this is something that the power structures
are rolling out. So we're gonna go over
what this was. The people involved, each one
of them, in their own special,
uniquely terrifying way are people that
even the conservatives and republicans were calling out
right before we could just like everything else
we're gonna talk about today. I'm gonna start
with a bunch of things that I have
to just have to talk about today.
Hopefully, quick points, go through them as quick
as I can that are not as important
as the larger topic we're gonna get to
today, which is gonna be most of the
entire show. The next show we do is
gonna be including
a lot of how this overlaps. Some points
like that today, but foreign policy and what's
going on with the ceasefire and generally
in in that larger conversation as well. But
this has a lot of moving parts to
it. The World Economic Forum overlaps that Trump
just spoke at Davos. How that you know,
it's and on top of all of it,
like, this very muddied,
incoherent, deliberately dishonest mainstream alternative media narrative that's
just constantly trying to chip away at how
flagrantly obvious all of this is.
And even conservatives are more and more and
more calling this out, which I'm happy to
see because it deserves being called out. So
before just, really, in general, I recommend you
if you I mean, not this moment while
you're watching right now, but if you have
the time before or you're about to watch
this and somebody told you, blah blah. You
know, I guess that doesn't make much sense
since you wouldn't know I was saying this.
The point is get caught up on some
of this information.
What we've talked about in the past around
Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum and
the overlap of all these, Whitney's long term
work, both for TLab and Unlimited Hangout,
about how this has been building, about how
clearly each one of these people are involved
in their own interesting way that intersects with
warp speed, COVID 19, technocracy,
transhumanism,
and it just could not be any more
obvious. Now I'll leave it there to start
because we have a lot to get to.
But my god. This is some important stuff
to talk about today, and I don't know
how anybody can deny what we're gonna go
through. From their own mouths, from their own
agendas,
from
the obvious point that seems
again, the point I keep highlighting here, which
will, of course, have some to end today
because it's important to see the continuation of
this. But how many people are continuing to
not call out what has been the central
focal point of seemingly
the entire work body of work
as it rolls out right in front of
them? And I don't know how else to
see that other than this has been an
ongoing long term prep for where we are
now. But I'd like to start with some
with something very positive, obviously. Now, I I
included this in the show notes at the
end of the show, at the top of
the notes after the show. I didn't see
this until we were done. And sure enough,
this did happen
right after
or during my livestream.
And that is the fact that Ross Ross,
from the Silk Road, Ross Albright was basically
pardoned
or commuted. Essentially, the what's what's interesting about
this is that this is something that is
still being disputed around
the partisan conversation. Like, some people even that
would you would argue even more right leaning
libertarian types seem to be of the mind
this person deserved to be in prison or
they sold drugs. And it's amazing to me
how uninformed people can be about such a
basic topic because of all the propaganda around
it. But I'm not gonna get into all
that now. We've talked about this in the
past. The bottom line is this person is
not a criminal. This is a person that
especially when we get into the talk conversation
about crypto a bit today, in regard to
how it's the the the field, the the
whole
ideology
around what this is it's supposed to be
something that circumvents the power structures. And so
in this concept, by creating something that is
sort of a step away outside, like, the
dark web or anything we're talking about in
that field, it's something that is not necessarily
legal just because they can't see it. But
within this is where people then did things
that you would call illegal. But then we
get into the question about whether drugs themselves
or what does the government have the right
to tell you what you can do with
your body. It's a big conversation. That's not
the point of this today. I I still
think I just wanna include that because it
frustrates me that we're still having to chip
away at that conversation too.
This person deserves to be free, and I'm
very happy to see Donald Trump do that,
period. There's no
caveat to it other than the ongoing general
point about my worry that even positive things
are being used by dishonest people in order
to convince people that are also honest that
they are honest when they're not.
Now that's just a worry. You can decide
whether, yourself, whether that's the case, and that
doesn't apply to just Donald Trump. It applies
to any powerful person that does that on
a regular basis. And I'm of the mind
that's what they're doing. But this is a
really good thing, and I'm glad that it
happened. Didn't happen on exactly day 1 like
was promised, but that's typical politics for you.
Nobody actually believes that, but they love to
make that the case.
But this person made a good comment that
I thought was relevant to bring up. He
said, nice to see you, and I think
he's being snide about it, but nice to
see you actually not criticizing something or skeptical.
I can't tell if he follows me. I'm
like, well, maybe that's, you know, because look,
are we really of a mind that there's
not, like, an overwhelming amount of things to
be skeptical and critical about today? Like like
the old saying, if you're not paranoid, you're
not paying attention. If you're not critical or
skeptical, you're not paying attention. So I can't
tell whether he's criticizing you or not. But
I wanted to make a point. Because I
really under the the thing is, yes. Because
almost everything I seem to come up against
these days is worthy of criticism or worthy
of ridicule because it is not what it
appears to be. That's not everything.
But, again, I am very, very adamant, and
you can prove it with the work we've
done, that that's not some hypothetical statement. Every
single day, we see things that were pushed
and screamed about, bipartisan sides left and right,
that later turn out to be not the
full picture.
So there you go. And we were so
that's the point. I simply said, this is
what it looks like when real things happen,
and not just misdirection,
misrepresentation,
and hype. Glad you pointed it out since
it happens so rarely. You party illusion. So
I wanna include that to start. 1 other
person had a point. Said you're the last
person I expect to drive traffic to CNN
since that was the article I shared. And
this isn't really relevant to what he's saying,
but I or I guess it is because
I wanna make a point around that. I
don't think offense to that. I mean, it's
I guess it's I he follows me as
well. And like he said, it's almost more
surprising than Trump keeping his word.
I don't know why that would be the
case. I think he's kinda trying to be
funny. I said, I share it from the
first place I see it reported, as always.
As if or as I always have stated,
simply call that honesty. That's my opinion. And
he said, you can do that, and, you
know, without basically giving the traffic and use
the archive.
I said, I I look at I look
at it as a thing of integrity.
I report the place I see it from
first, whether that's Infowars
or CNN or Fox, which I hold in
equally low regard. But I completely agree with
your point. I can definitely do that going
forward. So that's why I I'm including the
archive. But he and me, that's a fair
point. Right? I thought about it and said,
yeah. That's actually probably should've that should've been
what I did right there.
Nonetheless,
isn't that a point that I think is
important to make to kind of think about?
Yes. I agree. CNN and all the rest,
they're ridiculous, and they're constantly lying. But it's
for me,
it almost feels dishonest to look at it
and then jump to find something else to
use that report. So even the because the
I don't know. I get the I get
both sides of it. But I think today
more than ever, like, I'm talking about with
2 party illusion stuff and elections,
integrity
is worth erring on the side of. Even
if it ends up, you know, you you
see what I'm saying? And I just think
that's important. And it really isn't about CNN.
I just think that's important to make that
point.
Now before we get into everything else too,
I I will add from the title today.
We're gonna talk about a quick few other
updates.
Just ultimately that I think it's important, and
I should have said this to start. I
just forgot all these things to to I
write down that I forget.
That ultimately, the point about Israel and the
deep state
I'm I mean, it's up I want you
to
be critical, obviously, always. Question what I'm saying.
Poke holes in it everywhere you can. That's
what we should always be doing with everybody,
especially those you listen to and believe in.
The point though is that Israel, through SoftBank,
I think is a very obvious overlapping connection,
as well as literally everything else we're talking
about. I could point out 17 different overlaps
with everyone, but this one's important for obvious
reason I'll get to. But then also,
the deep state aspect of it, I just
think it's wild to me that we're watching
this roll out, and we're talking about
open AI or artificial intelligence in general as
it gets an infrastructure, which is you moments
ago, for these same people where it was
a huge red flag if it was being
done under the banner of a left leaning
person.
But then you have people like Ellison and
Oracle itself. My god. From COVID 19 and
a 1,000 other inner surveillance
deep state dynamics or, you know, CIA and
so on or,
even Elon Musk and the overlap within that.
But my point being that these things, these
elements that are a part of all of
this and the actual rollout of it, the
mRNA direction, the in the internal biosurveillance,
and the people that they're working with to
do it. I mean, this is what to
be very clear, nobody knows for certain what
the deep state is or example. Like, we
have ideas of this broad kind of thought,
you know, and it's unelected power structures. That's
really what it ultimately means. But we don't
know
I wouldn't argue anybody could prove to you
which one unless somebody has some signed affidavit
or, you know, retirement package, but that doesn't
happen with that. Right? But the point is
that what we generally know of that is
all of this. The intelligence entities, the surveillance
networks, it's all government interconnected stuff.
And so it really is interesting, and we'll
make a big point of that today. How
many people would normally have called this out
who are ignoring all of that just because
we're winning even though that's not really the
case, which is kind of a joke a
lot of people are making. Getting tired of
all the winning when you're showing all the
things that are going the other direction. But
it's weird how obvious it is. And on
that note, I continue to see more and
more people standing up. People that I you
know, when I that's what I was talking
about. That's the this is the red line
for a lot of people where they say,
okay.
I was trying I was trying to find
a reason, but this is just too far.
Good. It shows integrity. That's what needs to
happen.
Before we get into all of that, I
have a few other quick points I wanna
show. I just wanted to follow-up on this.
Sam Husseini, who, is I think we're gonna
have an interview coming up soon.
This is Decensored News sharing an an additional
point to what happened there. If you don't
remember,
he was dragged from the room, literally carried,
legs and arms, out of the room because
he dared to ask questions what they claim
is an inappropriate time. And I told you
at the time, if you've been following it,
it's because they already told him.
This video I'm gonna show you, but on
top of that too, Sam said this in
the last interview we had, that they won't
call on him. In this video, you're gonna
hear Matt Miller basically admit that the policy
is not to call on Sam. So then
he's forced to try to get questions in
where he can. And they're not abrupt they're
it's not they're trying they're trying to make
it out to be something where he's interrupting
and he's constant chaos and he's attacking people.
No. He's being a journalist. That's what a
journalist looks like. Not the meek followers in
the room that did nothing when he got
dragged out or the ones that only ask
questions when they're politely called upon or the
ones that only ask the questions that are
allowed to be asked because otherwise they wouldn't
be in the room, which we're seeing today.
So thank you, DCented News, for breaking this
down. I just wanted you to hear it
for yourself.
Believe,
go home, and do it from there. Or
if it's Just write it based on the
derma one, and we'll put much difference. I
think I read out and write you can
write it based on that. Have you guys
ever provided,
like, actual information on the El FIFA allegations
and so on? We've spoken to it on
the record. Yeah. I mean, date and time,
we found Hamas. We I
don't really have much more to say to
you again Yeah. The way you interrupted the
my briefing. So so there's a policy of
not calling on me. I have I have
a policy of not calling people who interrupt
other people's questions to make accusations against me.
Yep. Okay. Oh, yeah. How dare you? How
dare you interrupt? What is this? A first
grade classroom?
I mean, how ridiculous is that? Myself. So
so you have a policy of not calling
on me? I it it would apply to
anyone who comes in, and when somebody else
is asking a question, starts
starts starts starts No. So that there there
are other people that I wasn't lobbying accusations.
I was making an obvious observation, and you
know it's an obvious observation.
And it's scandalous that you would blackball a
journalist that way. It is. It's completely scandalous
that you would blackball a journalist that way.
So The day before election day So, Sam,
when you came in here and asked questions,
I used to call on you. When you
come in here You're very rare. Guy who's
acting as a criminal. Quite rarely, and now
you're completely black volleying. And what's important to
point out as well, he's lying. I mean,
you watch it for yourself if you can
stomach how ridiculous this exercise in futility actually
is. Matt Lee and plenty of others interject
every day in numerous different points and overtalk
Matt all the time. Matt Miller, who's the,
you know, smirking Dracula we call him in
the front there. The point is that that's
not true.
They just don't like Sam's questions.
Pretty simple.
These are the same people, by the way,
and left or right, by the way, as
I hope your new people recognize my my
opinion anyway, which I think is verifiable fact
that this is one government and all of
them are abusing the left right paradigm to
keep things like this going. Because right now
the the reason I say it now is
the people who right now were all cheered
up ignoring all the problems they see from
the, you know, Trump administration would look at
that and say, that's what Biden was all
about. We're saving free speech now. Well, no.
You're not. It's not happening despite that executive
order that just bluntly states, we're gonna do
that. Meet I'd love to see how that
plays out. I mean, look. As all the
rest of it, if he does something that
is like like Ross, that's actual, that has
an outcome that you can say, okay, and
there's not some deviation from it, there's not
some on top of it, there's not some
secret thing behind it, then you say, good.
Great. Good job. That's a good thing. But
when you have a 100 different bad things
and one good thing squeeze by, that's the
same thing. It's kind of like everybody expects
you to stand up and start doing jumping
jacks and go, look at how amazing Trump
just was. It's like, well, okay, it's a
good thing and I get that. But at
the same time, it's buried under 55 other
bad things, so I'm not really feeling great
about everything else. And then that gets framed
as somehow you being inconsistent. It's just it's
hilarious the way partisanship works.
But what's important
is clearly,
we have to see how this plays out.
Right? In a general sense, that ultimately, if
it gets better, if free speech improves, which
really means that they choose to more so
respect your inalienable rights that they don't really
fully respect, then I'll say that's a good
thing, but it should be. That's think of
it like that. It's like Elon Musk pretending
he's giving you a little bit more leeway
and they go, yay. Free speech. It's like,
no. He just lee loosened the leash. That's
not free speech. Free speech is free,
not restricted.
Now that's the limited speech you guys are
cheering for. My point though is that the
executive order stuff, there's a bunch of big
words and things he's saying, but it's still
just statements. Act an executive order is a
is a half step in the direction of
some action. It's something,
but it's not you know, anyway, I'll I'll
go I'll go off on that more in
a second. We're gonna get to a brief
part about the executive orders. But in this
case, I'm just making that point now because,
you know, the idea that
what Miller just did right there is only
unique to one side or the other is
the way they use this against you.
Just be smarter than that. Now, one of
the point I want another couple points I
wanna show you,
this is actually really interesting to me because
there's so much going on. And there's so
many things happening that it's so much gonna
get lost.
And this really frustrated me because we were
just making a point about this from that
hustle, b I t c h guy that
continually continues to lie about this in California
and the fires being a lithium plant. And
that that was a land grab. Maui 2
point o. Here it is. That's what he
said. And in the video he shared, it
was explicit that it was a battery storage
facility that were lithium batteries.
So so my store the point was going,
look. He's lying about this, which buried another
part of the story. But guess what it
also seems to have done, at least from
my perspective, is bury the actual story that
was around those batteries. Because apparently
then my point is this is how this
how much is going on. I probably would
have otherwise seen this. This is Jordan from
status quo saying that there's California lithium battery
plant that the apparently, a fire has been
continuing.
And it's lithium, and I guarantee this is
causing all sorts of problems. And if you
look at his report, people are having illnesses
and sickness and issues, and it's like, god,
every single day. Now on top of the
whether whatever you think about the fire, That
would change your opinion obviously on whether this
was done. But even if it was done
in some kind of deliberate way, which nobody
should dismiss, who's to say whether this was
meant to be burned or not? You know?
So it's hard to know what if this
was some deliberate thing. Regardless,
it's causing all sorts of health issues, and
I think it's important to highlight something like
that and the lack of coverage of it
from the corporate media while people are getting
sick.
So what's funny to me, or I guess
sad, is that because this guy uses this
for some other click shared nonsense, stories like
this get buried. Because otherwise, you look at
it and go, oh, that's that lithium thing.
Well, this is the real part of the
story.
I just you know? I I'm sure you
can sense my continual
increasingly
impatience
with the partisan game, especially right now.
Also, some other things you might have seen,
Trump signs ordered. I could have put this
in the executive order part in a second,
but I wanted to back it up with
something next.
Trump signs order to declassify files on JFK,
MLK assassinations. Well, we already saw that. That
kind of was floated the the day ago.
But
is this new?
I mean, we heard this last time, and
he released some files last time. What changed,
guys? Did we did we suddenly expand our
understanding? Well, we already knew most of this.
And since then, even RFK Junior said that
they killed the CIA killed his father. Guys,
it's one of those stories like the reality
of 911 or ISIS Al Qaeda being proxy
armies of the US and Israel. Most people
seem to have come to terms with these
things, just don't really like to say them
out loud because some of the more
more blindly idiotic people in the world that
pretend they're in the know like to call
you a conspiracy theorist. Nonetheless,
the JFK files and all this has already
happened. So, yes, again, if something actually comes
out that I feel demonstrates a fuller picture,
then I'll say good. I'm glad we see
that. But it's that they string you along
with these things. Like, I point out with
Las Vegas and other stories, they do this
to go So you go, what's a win?
Before you even see anything because you'd like
to believe the outcome or on and on
and on.
MLK, same point, guys. Look to James Corbett.
Type in,
the what's his name? Pepper and and, MLK
Junior. He's done multiple reports on this and
interviews with people that were involved. The u
the a court system in the United States
ruled from a civil side of it that
the US government was involved in his death.
Of course, because it was a civil side,
they weren't legally held accountable, but it's on
the record.
So we know all of this already, but
let's all cheer because he's gonna change the
world by half steps and, you know, that's
how I read this, but we'll wait and
see what actually comes of it. As well
as to point out, we don't even know
what's behind this veil. So how do we
know what the full picture is? It's very
easy to lie by omission, especially with stuff
like this. So it's hard to trust this.
But my point in showing that is because
it's one of those things, they love to
float, lock her up JFK and the Fed,
all these things they say.
What happened last
time? Clinton and them, best friends apparently, but,
you know, we'll still pretend it's gonna happen
at some point. And they're saying that about
a lot of these things right now. Wasn't
weren't Fauci and Bill Gates supposed to be
in prison right now when he got reelected?
Wasn't that the whole thing? They'll keep telling
you, get there, save them for last, like
Israel. Well, that's what you said last time.
So sure. I hope so.
But I base my opinions on fact and
precedent and what's in front of us. And
so far, everything shows you that this won't
happen the way he says it will.
But I have hope. Hope I'm wrong. On
top of that, this is just interesting. I
and this is why I think you see
things like this. So you have this may
mega thread, not a huge, I think,
11,000 followers saying, unseen 911 images have been
declassified.
These visuals will leave you speechless. The point
obviously meant to feel that this is Trump
releasing new information about 911. And even Twitter
was like, nope. Those are old. You can
find them on 10 I. They've been there
for a while.
But
why that this happens. This is how this
game is played. Be aware of that. Understand
that's part of free speech to show discernment.
That's important.
Now a couple other points overlapping with Israel
that I thought were important, for just things
for you to see that I'll get more
into tomorrow.
I've I've been talking about this a lot
only because it's so frustrating to me to
see how disgustingly abusive these people are. The
Zionists that are still using the memory, the
name of this family despite, and this is
important the way I've always said this, the
father claiming they were killed by IDF bombs.
Now, of course, I've always said he he
could be forced to say that. But the
reality of the picture, the the bigger point
is that every single one of these people
that have said these things that were in
Gaza have come home, and they've maintained those
statements to this point. So, again, precedent, logic,
what we see so far, it seems like
that would hold for this. But we don't
know for sure until we actually see them
come or turn up to be dead. Sadly,
these are children. And so the fact that
they were taken was a crime. And anybody
involved, Hamas, whoever else, they should be held
accountable for it. Right? That doesn't change anything.
And also, it doesn't change the legal act
of armed resistance protected by the Fort Geneva
Convention and international law that anybody in Palestine
could've acted under. Anybody.
An individual, an entire group, a terror a
literal terrorist organization could've acted to in the
name of Palestine
if their people in pal in Gaza, and
it would've been a legally protected act with
the Fortuna Convention because it is an occupied
territory under international law.
Simple fact. The point is they did take
these children and somebody should be held accountable
for that. But you know what somebody should
also be held accountable for? The fact that
their bombs have been so indiscriminate,
if not deliberately indiscriminate,
that they've killed a lot of their own
people. A lot of people think that's the
Hannibal directive continuing after October 7th.
And he is on the record on this
video telling you that they were killed by
IDF bombs, and they know that. So at
this point, with everything we know, the logic
is that that's the case if everything else
is held true. So we'll have to wait
and see. My point on this
is I've been posting this kind of thing
underneath
everybody that I see posting this. Think Aviva
Clampas being, like,
constant.
Every other day. Or, Elon Levy did it
for, like, a week straight. Every day. What
about these children? And they made they made
articles about it because they're redheads and they
think they're unique. It's about trying to manipulate
westerners. That's what it's about. And I simply
said, all these Zionists continue to use the
Bebas children for their genocidal propaganda,
even though their father publicly admitted they were
killed by IDF bombs months ago, which they
verifiably know. They know he said this, this
has been public.
And point is, even Dan Cohen, right there
at the link,
showed you that even corporate media was forced
to acknowledge that and they still lie about
it. My point is, today, a new article.
Now because now it has to come to
a head because they're, apparently about to release
everybody.
Hamas says that Shiri b Bebas and her
children are dead. Many Israelis don't believe it.
Well, see my point what do you mean?
Well, at this point, the way you read
this, if you read the article, they're making
it sound like some new claim. It has
been about exposed, so it frustrates me.
How long have we been pointing this out
under all and post posting it under all
the prominent Zionist liars,
who all use these children to this very
day despite knowing this. It's disgusting. It's truly,
truly disgusting, and it shows you the depravity
of these people.
On top of that, what also shows that,
which overlaps with the current government in this
country.
How long I mean, this from the moment
the ceasefire was even mentioned before it even
went into, quote, effect, whatever you think that
means, as Israel's continued to violate it from
day 1 forward, easily proven on video,
that
the US government with Trump's administration made a
deal with Netanyahu. That was reported through us
because we read it through Horets, Ynet News,
and through the mouths of people in the
Knesset.
Even members of the Likud party that's Netanyahu's
openly cheering and saying, Trump said we could
violate the deal in the second phase.
Well, turns out they're filing it way before
that, but here is what even Horetz wrote.
Netanyahu's government and Trump administration green light Jewish
West Bank terror.
That's a the leading Israeli platform. And as
this person says, Heretz publishes what we're not
allowed to say.
So the point is, guys, that clearly, even
Heretz is telling you the Trump administration
made an agreement with them to be able
to occupy and annex the West Bank, which
is what's happening right now. And on that
note, I should grab this too as I
talked about in the last show.
Robert wrote an actual article about that. The
West Bank now is one of these focuses.
But realize that it also includes
it also includes
other parts of this agree, like the not
so Syria is involved.
There you go. Right? Lebanon's involved.
The illusion of a ceasefire, which is going
to be broken. I I'm I'm just my
opinion, but it's based on what they're telling
you, And it already is being broken. My
point is it's gonna be officially, like, publicly
broken
on aft in the second phase after they
get some of their people back, and that
goes right back to Gaza then, which is
already just the flattened and gone. But they're
right now rounding up people in West Bank.
They're bombing the West Bank. They just shut
off electricity at the
Guys, it's all it's Gaza 2 point starting
all over again.
So we'll get to that more tomorrow, but
it sickens me that we're at a point
now where this isn't the most obvious thing
in the world. For most people, it is.
But the Trump administration, making agreements with them
to keep it going. And I said exactly
what we reported before the ceasefire even began.
It was all there to see if you're
willing to look and not be blinded by
partisan parties
or, by blinded bipartisanship.
Now on another note around this,
Pete Hegseth, you know, the, like, rabidly
prophetic Zionist supporter,
pro Israel, make Israel great again candidate,
has been
advanced through the nomination
even despite people from the GOP
pushing back. What does that show you?
Are you gonna pretend like this is some
damn verse Republican dynamic when the some of
the Republicans are the ones pushing back and
ever at most everybody else, including remember Marco
Rubio just got confirmed 99 to 0.
Where are all those Democrats that are supposed
to be hating all the Republic? The reality
is, guys, they're all on one side, and
it's not America right now. We need to
be under we need to start understanding what's
happening in front of us.
Glenn Greenwald points
out criticism of Israel is what's being censored.
Now this is fire pointing out criticizing Israeli
government policy can now get you punished at
Harvard.
Now there's another school I just saw, by
the way, where they were also saying you're
not even allowed to speak out, carry a
flag. Like, this is wild where this has
gone.
And it look. You could argue you think
Palestinian this or that. The point is it
still doesn't change the reality of what's happening.
At what point did we ever pretend tell
being told you're not allowed to say a
word or hold a certain flag is a
I mean, even a Nazi flag. As much
as we could all say, yes, that represents
hate, and it's disgusting. In the in the
past, it's been upheld
as you're right, even burning the American flag.
And now we're at a point where they're
basically rolling all that back for Israel, and
we're still screaming free speech and liberty.
Some people are.
But today, Harvard adopted the expansive
version of the viewpoint discriminatory
a IHRA
definition of antisemitism, which basically means conflation with
Zionism or claiming Zionism isn't
Judaism, which it is not, apparently, is racist
to them, denying the Holocaust, what you know,
all these different things they put out there.
Which the point is, whatever you think about
that, it's a free you have a right
to free speech and express whatever you think.
Or if you just wanna be hurtful, you
have a right to do that. That's free
speech.
The point is that they don't like that.
Now who is they? Who do you think
is making that happen? Israel.
Glenn says the greatest amount of political censorship
over the last 15 months in the US,
legal, institutional, cultural, and online, has been aimed
at punishing
or oppressing criticism of Israel. Now understand, he's
not saying hatred for Jewish people. He's saying
people that are going, Israel's bombing kids in
Gaza. Oh, you're a racist.
That's what's
happening. Nothing is close, he says, and it's
been cheered by lucratively branded free speech advocates.
He sees it.
Now TikTok overlap.
TikTok is now currently being censored at the
behest of the US government. The app is
still functionally banned.
They're removing free Palestinian content. Free Palestine.
Free Luigi. Well, you know, that's the, the
CEO of the health conversation.
Nazi lives do not matter, it says. Deleted.
Do you hear the people say? The point
is free Palestine is one that I think
stands out to me, and there's even that's
really circulating around it. But the point is
things that were once allowed are now being
removed. Free Palestine or free anything should not
be something censored.
You have free speech right.
But it's also their platform and their terms
of service. The point is that in this
case, it's something that was the point. This
is why it has to go away. We
just talked about it. They're all on the
record. Even Blinken said this publicly. Congressman have
been admitting this on I think Rolling Stones
did an article about it. We gotta stop
the anti Israel content. Okay. Now they take
it and they pretend they Trump brings it
back, and then guess what? Now you're not
allowed to say these things?
I mean, it really does take a special
kind of willful ignorance to not see what's
happening right now.
Here is naivety pointing out, naivety,
saying TikTok is dead. Free Palestine is now
considered a symbol of hate. And it just
shows you a live action shot of it,
free Palestine, and it shows the comment. Then
all of a sudden, he he refreshes, it
goes away, and then you get the notification
that says,
right here.
The comment you posted.
There. Free Palestine. Comment removed. So you literally
removed the comment.
That's wild to me.
Now, other censorship, I'm gonna show you in
a second. But I want you to think
about that. Right? What what actually what do
you think is going on right there? And
let's also remember that, where was it? Right
here.
I don't I don't wanna jump ahead too
far. Yeah. Right there.
That the guy, the CEO of TikTok, was
literally at Trump's inauguration.
How does that even make sense with everything
that they were talking about? It's not like
anything changed, at least as we're told. Right?
They were gonna ban it because CCP and
info and surveillance, and then Trump just said
pause for 75 days, brought it back around.
Here he is the inauguration. All good. Right?
So all that matters is you guys control
the yeah. That's what we've been saying the
whole time. And, honestly, I think there's much
more going on behind this than we realize.
I said that before. Whether even amongst China
and the United States governments. Something's going on.
That what we're being told about this is
not the reality, especially if we end up
seeing Elon Musk somehow take more control of
it. Either way, it is not what it
appears to be. We're being manipulated, and it's
very transparent to most anyway. Now on another
censorship point, I just thought this was interesting,
and this is a very disgustingly sad image.
If you haven't seen this, we'll talk about
more. We we'd already pointed it out, but
in the next show,
this little child was celebrating the ceasefire. Robert
covered this in the article.
They they what they basically did was pretend
that they well, they there there was a
list they were supposed to get for
exchanging for the ceasefire.
Hamas said that there was some kind of
an issue. They had delayed on making the
list, and they ended up giving it to
him, you know, so many hours later.
The point was that Israel claimed that because
they didn't get the list, therefore, they're gonna
keep bombing up until the last minute, and
they were murdering people, children, civilians.
And the point is that after the ceasefire
moment, the time that it was supposed to
go into effect began,
they didn't start bombing immediately. They waited 15
minutes. They waited until just enough time until
all these people ran out the streets and
said, hooray. Cease fire, and then they bombed
them all.
That's it's so easy to prove. It makes
me feel sick. And we're watching this happen,
and you're not even hearing that from almost
everybody.
This little girl was out there celebrating, and
that's the that's what happened. Now I was
trying to embed this in the article that
we did for that Robert put out. And
I'll show you right now. This is the
kind of censorship we're seeing on this platform.
Embed the post.
Here it is. Oh, look. Nothing found. You
try it as many times as you want
and they won't let you embed this post.
Half the time I try to load it,
the image doesn't even come up. This is
the kind of censorship what you don't really
see. It's suppression, guys. And this is what
they're doing. For all I know, it isn't
even there for half people looking at it.
That makes me sad.
Also,
this is actually a funny one, and we'll
make a quick point about this next. Caitlin
Johnstone shared this little clip. You've probably seen
it,
which I think is funny because we'll just
quickly follow-up on this since it's hilarious to
me the kind of in nonsense we're getting
from partisans right now. But, you know, this
for I'll make my point again. The idea
that it's absurd. The only honest way to
cover this, which is what Caitlin is doing,
is that, yes, if you what you see
right there is undeniably,
literally,
a a
whatever you wanna call it, Roman salute, Nazi
salute, whatever it is. It's the identical same
thing. Okay? So whether he meant it that
way or not, who knows?
Maybe he's just, you know, Asperger's and autism
and he didn't know whatever you wanna think
because the point is you don't know either.
He maybe he literally didn't mean to do
it as an who knows? Because I actually
think it's really dumb to pretend this guy
is a Nazi. I don't think he's a
Nazi. Nazis are something very specific or you
can call him a racist if you want
and that's up for you to decide. But
my point is, nobody knows what he meant
with it. So you so you go, okay.
Well, it could just be his symbol. Okay.
But to pretend it's not what it exactly
is just because you think he didn't mean
it, well, that's dumb. As as we'll get
to in a second, off guard and calls
it a subjectivity test. They're just being objective
about this, guys. It's obvious that this is
exactly what that looks like. But you can
then say, but he didn't mean it that
way. But everyone's going, that's not what it
is and you're making that up. No, it's
not. It's exactly the same thing. And on
top of that, there men I'll show you
next showing all these really dumb pictures of
people that just have their arms in the
air. As if that somehow was even remotely
the same thing. Neither of which I think
meant it this way unless you think it
was done to make all this happen which
I think those are the only two real
possibilities.
This was some ridiculous mistake, which I kinda
don't think so. I'm leaning towards the whole
ADL Zionism overlap that's very clearly promoting. But,
again, I have no idea what he actually
thought because I'm not stupid.
Rather,
the part it's just it's it's ignorant to
me to pretend like anybody knows what anybody
else thinks, feels. You know? Trump loves this
or he knows this or Elon's wants to
do that. You guys don't know. You're repeating
narratives.
My point in this, though, is she ship
she shared this because people are going,
those were not textbook. I've watched the History
Channel. And then sure. Okay. And this is
that blood tribe group. It's just ridiculous how
exactly the same thing it is. You know?
Okay. We'll make some points in a second.
But I wanna show you this.
So this is Caitlin Johnstone. Right? Here she
is. That's her her account. She shared the
media.
That's it's right there, very clearly.
If you look on her media page, and
I'll refresh it, guess what's not there?
How interesting is that? And if you look
at the dates on this, this these last
2 were the this last only the last
2 were the same day that's posted. The
rest are before.
That's a small thing, but I don't you
think that's relevant?
How what a petty stupid thing for this
platform to sort of just go well, we
just don't even show that one.
Or whatever you think it is, but it's
not there. You guys can decide for yourselves.
And if you guys know under the media
tab, any media, images, or videos you post,
well, they should be there. And you can
scroll. You can look. It's not there.
That's just crazy, and it's quite sad, actually.
What a petty, insecure person.
So
on that note, and we're gonna come back
to this one second. Alex Jones says gaslighting
the world. We're gonna there's a lot about
the WEF overlap. They're trying to make it
look like they're all calling it out as
both Malay and Trump and a lot of
people they pretend are on their side or
all their speaking. And it's just funny. Because
any it doesn't matter what they were saying.
If it was Kamala and Biden, it would
be like, they're there. They're part of it.
It's, you know, you know how this goes.
But he goes, chancellor Olaf School says that
Germany supports free speech by banning free speech.
Bombshell. And I said, sounds like somebody you
know, bud. Just
doesn't that sound like somebody you know? Yeah.
Except you pretend he's not doing it. You
know exactly what I'm talking about. But on
that note, I just think it's funny.
So
this was the one I really share when
I first saw it. I just said, that's
wild. It's just ridiculous.
That it's obviously pretty damn aggressive for your
heart. Right? He slams his heart. He hits
his arm. He bites his lip, and you
hear him grunt when he does it. He
turns around and does it twice. Again, though,
who knows what he actually meant? Or if
it was done for this very reason, knowing
the ADL would come and go give him
the benefit of the doubt even though literally
wearing a checkered
scarf or
a a Palestinian flag makes you a Nazi
in the eyes of that ridiculous platform.
But this person goes, I think this is
sending a love symbol. It's not a Nazi.
You know, it shows all these right here.
All the Obama and Clinton and all the
rest and you know? And really, not even
you know? Whether you know, funny enough, you
can even pretend they're a Nazi more than
Elon Musk, but still argue that what they're
doing there is not the same thing if
you finally
look at I I I grabbed the top
2, and you can see that they're just
simply talking and having their arm in the
air. Yeah. But who knows? Maybe he made
it that way. Just the same point. So
it's equally stupid to pretend we know, but,
obviously, to pretend that's even really the same
thing as what he just did is also
really stupid. And I said, everyone was showing
that, including me, and your damn will know
the difference. And claiming he's a Nazi is
just as stupid as pretending this wasn't a
Nazi salute whether or not he meant it
that way. Of course, it's possible. That's the
only honest way to cover this.
And then Caitlin doing the same thing responded
to this, and he goes, so has Kamal
and so has Kamal and hill Hillary. It
seems like a popular thing saying they've done
the same thing. But
she goes, yes. All things are exactly the
same as all other things. That's how we
all live our lives. And again, you could
just point it out, you know, you're watching
them. So you you've seen Elon Musk at
the bottom.
Here's here's she's at the top. Pardon by
what has been inspired to do the work
of You don't you don't have to hear
her talk. But so that's right there. That's
the that's the thing. Arm in the air
making a point, and that's supposed to be
you know, it's it's intentionally
dishonest, if not just lazy trolling.
And then here's him doing his thing.
Yeah. Real, real close. Right?
And then lives at TikTok. Hey, o AOC.
Care to explain?
Look. I look. I'm not of the mind
they think that's a Nazi salute. What I'm
saying is it's really silly of them to
pretend that that is the same thing as
what he did. It's a it's a small
point, but this is the level of dishonesty
around all of this. And, of course, even
then it's funny because she shares the actual
video,
which literally shows that that's not what she's
doing.
Of course, cuts it to 4 seconds so
it looks like that's a constant thing happening.
Again, can't stop screaming about how you're cutting,
which most people aren't even doing, Elon's, to
cut out the part where he says from
your heart, which he actually says at the
end afterward, after 2 times of doing it,
which is funny to me. That's just the
it's so embarrassing.
These people are in a grift forever because
they're making so much money and influence off
what's going on here. You know? I I
remember this account during COVID doing things that
I thought were somewhat important.
At the at the very least, like, in
a comical way, still calling out things that
were accurate. And look. Even though it's not
just because I agreed with certain perspectives during
that time frame. I don't care if we
were all talking about how the cut shots
were killing people. If she was doing something
or he or whoever it is doing something
dishonest and it wasn't accurate, I wouldn't have
promoted it. But something shifted around this. And
I think that's interesting to see. Not this
topic, but, you know, post Elon Musk.
Now this one says, mister Jones doing the
same thing. Bombshell video. Leaders of the Democrat
party pledge allegiance to Hitler. So, obviously, he's
joking. He's in I don't think he means
that or thinks that, but they're playing into
it. And, of course,
ADL says that it's not. Oh, thanks. I'm
sure glad that he's taking ADL at their
word. Isn't that what independent journal is supposed
to do? Reflect the ADL? But, of course,
they show the same thing
wherever it is in here. Yeah. Right there.
That's lazy. And I said, you're all so
childishly dishonest. It's hard to watch. Calling Elon
a Nazi is just as stupid as pretending
that you are showing above is even remotely
the same thing as Elon did, whether or
not he meant it.
This this person but this this is the
last part I thought I wanna show. It's
interesting. The only one that even comes remotely
close, which is interesting because it's walls,
is he comes out on the stage
and does this. Watch.
Pats his heart
and waves.
Now again, that's the closest I've ever seen
to what he just did. But that's still
not even remotely the same thing. He taps
his heart and he waves with his hand
at, like, a, like, a 90 degree angle.
It's just lazy to pretend like that's the
same thing. But see people are so desperate
to hide from what they don't want to
like, I think a lot of people are
doing this because they're blindly supporting Elon. But
I think there's a huge crowd of this
that is so desperate to not acknowledge
what this might show you. And that might
what all that may be is that they're
that we're all being psychologically manipulated through some
kind of larger agenda. I think that's largely
pro most likely would happen. That I don't
think somebody could do that twice on accident.
But I don't also don't think he's a
Nazi. I think that's silly.
My point is I think it's very clearly
well, you could argue through Zionism that you
might as well be the same thing. That's
a fair point to make, which will begin
into tomorrow or the next show. But, nonetheless,
clearly, it's just a game. And I just
simply said you dunked on yourself here, man.
It's not even close to the same thing,
but so what?
Now on top of that, showing the woke
right of it all, guess what?
Evan loves Wharf says, sorry. The conservatives
told me they rescued free speech and cancel
culture was over. Well, guess what?
Sam Couple
from CBS
has just been fired for criticizing Elon Musk's
Nazi salute or whatever you wanna call it.
Isn't that interesting?
But you're not gonna hear them freak out
about cancel culture or anything like that because
they're okay with it, What shows you the
hypocrisy of the whole thing? Look for yourself.
Now it's interesting to me though because here's
even New York Times reporting it. Or excuse
me, New York Post.
Milwaukee CBS weather reporter Sam Kerpel, couple
fired after criticizing Musk. So if you read
the comments, everyone's like, that's not what it
was, and it's probably something else, and they
just don't wanna look because it's very clearly
what it was. And it says that she
worked on CBS, and she criticized him as
a Nazi. And it says it basically cut
to the chase. She says, here, dude, Nazi
saluted twice twice during the inauguration, which objectively
is the case. Did he mean it that
way?
Same point. But to pretend it wasn't is
just dumb. It really is.
And then it also says screw it's a
clip from,
Always Sunny. And he says, screw that old
b I t c h. He's a Nazi,
and she's kinda making a joke out of
it. Right? And she got fired for it.
And that that's what they report in this
article.
I just think that's interesting. Isn't that I
mean, that is exactly what we keep seeing
on the other side that they just can't
stop screaming about, and nobody seems to come
wanna comment about this. They're all in many
cases, mon republicans are cheering it on. Just
like this example we talked about back then
when this woman,
how just how distasteful or not it might
have been, made it made it a tweet
about how the person who shot at Trump's
ear, if that's what you think actually went
down, should have been a better shot. And,
yes, that's a that's a insensitive joke. He's
a human being.
But they went after this woman, got her
fired, and laughed and cheered it on. That's
what happened. They literally this person went there
and filmed what and calling her out, lives
with TikTok, made a big video about it,
followed up, even called the whole the location,
and they fired her. That is exactly the
woke right we're always talking about.
Breaking. Person no longer an employee, and they
were a part of it the whole way,
and I proved it on the show
while trying to kinda water it down afterward.
That is the woke right.
Now on top of it all, after he
does all that and the ADL comes in
and goes, no. No. No. No. Let's take
a breath. We don't know. Elon could've been
wrong. Take give him the benefit of the
doubt. Now when have you ever heard them
do that before?
Elon Benjamin Netanyahu says, Elon is being falsely
smeared.
Elon's a great friend of Israel. He sure
is. He visited Israel after October 7th massacre,
you know, the Hannibal Directive, of course, in
which Hannah Hamas committed its worst atrocity against
the Jewish people since the holocaust. No. It
committed against Zionism and Israel as they stated,
but you can lie about it all you'd
like. He was since repeatedly and forcefully supported
Israel's right to defend itself, otherwise known as
genocide, and he he sure has. Also, genocidal
terrorists and regimes should you know, that this
is where you're getting from.
Oh, here here he goes. The radical leftist
and I was I you know, it's funny.
I was gonna point this out the last
show.
The only way they can get you to
look another direction right now is to fall
back into the buzzword talking points. Right? That's
why he lurched into the pedophile,
you know, gangs and Muslims and you and
European Union
because and there's very real stuff around that
because he and democrat this and that trying
to get you to look anywhere other than
he just censored a lot of people around
the h b one conversation
or as one b. I forget.
But the point is
radical leftists are really upset that they had
to take time out of their busy day
praising Hamas to call me a Nazi. It's
just lazy because most people I can see
in congress are not praising Hamas whether or
not they're supporting Palestine. That's pretty clear because
it's politically inconvenient for them even if they
believe that. So he's making that up on
top of most of it. There are a
couple I've heard make some overarching statement that,
I support Hamas. Maybe they have. It's certainly
possible. But it's also a group that's funded
by Israel, so that should matter. But that
he's trying to make it out to be
Nazis versus Hamas as if they're the ones
they're not.
That's a lazy argument. Zionism and and Nazism
are damn near the same thing backed by
the actual or you can even go back
to Saboteanism and one of the foundational elements.
Or the fact that they literally aligned themselves
with Nazi Germany, it's literally in Wikipedia. Harass
wrote an entire article about it. I'll cover
that more tomorrow. I have many times already.
But what's funny, the radical leftist are mad
because
that's all you can do. That's the best
you got. And clearly, Benjamin Netanyahu is playing
his role.
And he goes, thank you.
And then Kevork Almayrzion, who you should be
following. He says endorsement by by Benjamin Netanyahu
is not the flex you think it is.
How embarrassing.
But, of course, this is important
because
there's more lies on top of this going
around, which all that serves to do. And
I guarantee
my opinion, but I very strongly feel there's
a deliberate action happening here. Because if you
pack it on all sides with things that
you can actually prove are false, many people
then bury it all like it's false.
So this person shares, like a lot of
people are, a fake tweet
that says, what can I say? I got
caught up in the moment, but I wasn't
SIG Heil. Why would I pledge allegiance to
a nation 80 years dead? Why why would
I lionize a subdued and failed state?
MAGA is the future and will, in fact,
succeed in all ways Nazi Germany failed to.
Now it's actually well done as a lie
because it's not as clumsy as you usually
see. You could argue that that might even
make sense because you could even argue you
would say that not even mean
do the Nazi things, but just say we'll
succeed because they're a terrible group. You know?
My point is it's not real. But it
worked because a lot of people fell for
it, and then they go, oh, it's fake.
And then they start to pretend like the
whole thing was a ruse.
I think that's important. Musk did not post
this. And I I I that recently popped
up. I simply went through the effort, frustratingly
enough, after I saw that, before I saw
this, just searching for it on this platform,
which is hard because I've already proven to
you half the time you can search for
something, and if they don't want you to
see it, it doesn't even show up. But
then they did the fact check. But even
then, maybe they're just lying about it. My
my point is based on my due diligence,
I don't think that's a real tweet.
But that's how it works. Now off guard,
you know, I'll leave with their point on
this segment. The Musk Nazi salute is one
of those subjectivity tests, like the blue dress
that some people thought was white a few
years ago, except this is curated and engineered.
US politics has become 2 camps that will
never agree on what they see because they
literally no longer see the same thing. Really
interesting to think about. Like, psychologically speaking, we
are being manipulated to that point. He says
they she's the off guardian says they live
in partitioned realities.
Very well said. That's important. Much bigger, especially
then once we get into
I don't know. What I mean, there's so
many ways to frame it.
An alternate reality, whether metaverse or digital ID,
all these different in where this is going.
The artificial intelligence concept that we're gonna get
into opens this up in a way that
it becomes hard to even grasp what you
have to wrap your mind around.
Now, another point I wanna get into before
we get further into that, 2 more things
really. I wanna talk about this
January 6th follow-up,
WHO,
and some of the some of the, executive
orders. Where we at? Okay. That's not bad
for the then and then the rest of
the show is gonna be the focus on
the main topic. So January 6th, as you
already know, the failed false flag meant to
blame Russia and you using the CIA grown
Azzopard battalion. Or the one the one I
followed up with, it's probably down below, was
always a government operation. This should be undeniable
at this point. Now what I wanna follow-up
on is not that. Just include this so
you can understand that as well as the
Nazi symbols and the Azov movement, which should
be very interesting right now. And I'm not
gonna get into the shooting today. That'll be
probably tomorrow as well in Nashville or rather
outside of Nashville. But interesting how this guy
is in images with Nazi flags and doing
a Zig Heil, and look at the timing.
It's very interesting.
Radicalization
through 4 chan or whatever we're talking about.
It's like we're being played. I'm very convinced
about that. That's not even to say this
guy, no, is part of something.
Everything can be used, but these things are
being manufactured. I think we can prove that
today. But coming back to this.
Oh, yeah. And the other article I think
is important. Zionism versus Nazism. Israel's connection to
extremist ideology and the ADL's history of faking
Nazi marches. That's one of the main reasons
I included that. Again, more of this tomorrow.
But the the idea of actually faking these
things is something the ADL has been caught
for more than once in Chicago once. I
mean, I've covered this already. More tomorrow or
the next show, in case it's not tomorrow.
The reason I bring it up
is well, in in first, in the context
of January 6th. So he this is Alex
Jones talking about this on the 21st.
Infamous DC Gulag dungeon keepers defy Trump's pardon
of January 6th hostage. And this caused a
lot of of of
chaos.
People were really upset. People were call talking
about action and legal action and physical action.
Now my point at the time was, well,
hold on. Like, this just happened.
Clearly, it does not just there's a process
to it. People have to be released. And
I even argued still that I bet you
they drag their feet just to stick it
to them because these are individuals that probably
have a part part of us in perspective
because we're the most people are played that
way.
And so I said, if they don't get
released more tomorrow,
right, this was on the on the 22nd,
well, then well, then we'll should talk about
it. Right? Now, what did you notice?
No. It just went away.
Right? So it's not there there wasn't this
big, oh, they're still arrested. It's still gone.
Okay. But there also wasn't, oh, looks like
they're all released. Everybody can relax.
Which is what you damn well better do
if you push nonsense like this, like we've
seen before. Like the drones. Like the every
other day about the inauguration, false flag attacks,
and everyone's coming in the deep it didn't
happen. Well, then you better stand up and
go, well, looks like I was incorrect, which
is what you know can count on from
this platform. I've done it many
times. We're all wrong at some point. But
my track record shows how often that's how
unique that is in the long run of
everything we've done. Yeah, I've had plenty of
things that I had to follow-up on. So
it looks like that was wrong. I misread
this or that was wrong.
Important though because here's what actually happened. Now,
to the best of my knowledge and what
I've I'm looking
as everything I could find
based on and and the the reason I'm
even saying that is because today, it just
seems like some things are seeming almost intentionally
very, very difficult to find, but here's what
I found.
Oh, and this is only 21st too. And
then I wanna show this because this is
what you were getting. He's going, shocking January
6th development. DC prison guard suspend the release.
All they really said was that they were
processing. It's time to it's the end of
the day. We'll do the rest tomorrow.
And that's how that got framed.
This guy,
everyone down below, we know who he is.
Where does he live? That's the kind of
thing that was happening.
Crazy, guys. And so if you wanna even
talk about how January 6th could be or,
you know, engineered to drive people to carry
out violence, which is what I believe it
was, even though they didn't take the bait,
thank god, not, you know, other than some
specific examples,
that's what we're talking about. And Jake Jones
played his role just like everybody else. And
so here we are doing the same thing,
trying to get people in trouble yet again,
it feels like. But oh, wait. One more
point, actually. And this is on the 21st
as well. This is the kind of nonsense
I'm talking about. Now this is shouldn't be
something you dismiss. Of course, it's possible. But
this person goes, folks, it gets worse.
Right. Based on what? A report going around.
A report from where? Don't worry about it.
Here's text on Twitter. Reports
that Muriel Muriel Bowser is refusing to release
the January 6th defendants because their body show
signs of torture while in custody. Oh, maybe
you're confusing that with what's going on in
Israel.
Is it a show she wants the jir
injuries, broken bones, and black and blue faces
to heal before releasing them. Based
on what?
Think about that crazy claim. Okay? And then
guess what? Nope. Every they got released as
far as I can tell. January 6th, pardon
freeze 100 of capital rioters. This is on
the 22nd.
And following up into oh, there there was
one caveat, actually, that this was the one
right here. Vinyl wave of January 6 prisoners
released continue.
Okay.
So at the very least,
to the I'm gonna show you the the
one caveat that I was able to find,
which I'll point out that I guess it's
possible there's other individuals that have some other
hitch. Right? Also, remember that Donald Trump didn't
even say he would release everybody despite statements
publicly.
If you read the information,
they still have a carve out for specific,
like, very like,
violent aspects of it. They made that clear.
So if he just doesn't speak up again
about it, these people will carry on thinking
they're refusing to let him go, and he
gay pardoned everybody, which I don't think is
the full picture.
Either way,
at this point, it seems like everybody is
being processed unless I'm missing something else. On
top of that, then here's the caveat.
This one's from today.
It says prosecutors not dropping charges of failure
to appear,
and I guarantee you this gets used. Now
that you could argue this is political games.
Certainly could be.
But if Trump didn't explicitly pardon them for
what this is, which he could do tomorrow
too, by the way,
then I'll I'll read it to you first.
So it says the 2 accused US Capitol
rioters, Polk County remained in jail Thursday, and
that is today, despite receiving pardons. And it
says federal prosecutors indicated Thursday that while they
are dropping all the charges
related to January 6th, because that's what Trump
signed,
they are not dismissing charges of failure to
appear in court, which is an interesting point.
Right? Because if the charge is gone, what
does that even matter?
That's what I would argue. But this is
them being their typical bureaucratic
manipulators.
The point being that they shouldn't they didn't
show up at court, so they still violated
this, you know, our authority
based on something that we now say is
invalid anyway. So my point is it shouldn't
matter. They should be released. That's what I
think. I honestly have very little respect for
these con things anyway, but the point
is that they're going to keep them because
of this charge, which technically
is correct.
And so I think what's interesting is Trump
is either gonna do nothing and they'll make
a big stink about it or they'll pardon
them tomorrow on top of that. But the
overall point is all that big screaming hype
about whether holding all the January sixers and
they're gonna keep them because democrats
turns out to be another nonsensical
hype push to get people all freaking out
while so they ignore
what we're gonna talk about today amongst other
things.
I think that is damn well easy to
prove.
Now, on the WHO point, which is another
one, by the way, that I all these
I'm highlighting are things that are getting kinda
blown out of proportion in ways that I
think are meant to distract from what this
really is, The rollout of this AI control
structure that we've been talking about.
But Whitney pointed this out. This was in
regard to and this is this people it's
so funny how people desperately go after Whitney
for being accurate.
Weinstein seems to be obsessed with trying to
dunk on her as she calls it even
though he's consistently incorrect about what she says.
Seems that he doesn't even hasn't even read
the work that he criticizes,
which seems embarrassing.
But that that seems to be more than
he because he knows he's he's seems to
be a smart guy. He would know that
somebody will be able to read it and
look and say he's wrong. So that speaks
to an agenda to me, quite frankly. But
you can decide for yourself. He says, America
has left the WHO. Well done. And we
already talked about this. Well, all point all
the point that Whitney made, that Derek made,
all the and same point that we've talked
about. He's okay. Well, that's I argue that's
a good thing,
but last time, all that happened was he
pulled out of the WHO and there was
millions going to them, and then money got
redirected.
And and the the the point is this
is where people get all people
making make claim that there's inaccuracies here.
Now to be more specific,
Trump's administration
under Trump's administration, they well, Trump pulled out
of the WHO, which is funny because then
Trump did that even though that's his administration
too, but he did do the action. Then
under his administration,
more money went to Gavi, as I'll prove
to you in a second, than was ever
going to WHO.
Gavi being the lead funder of the WHO,
and that's Bill Gates. And that was through
USAID.
Okay. So the only point we're making, and
you could argue that Trump didn't know that.
That's certainly possible. But that seems to be
kind of a wishful thinking tactic because if
it's Biden,
well, apparently, it doesn't matter. And even though
we can argue he's senile, of course, anything
that happens in any stretch as far as
you wanna look in the administration is his
responsibility. Well, I would agree with that. But
see how that doesn't get applied both ways.
Whether he knew about it or not, that's
Trump's administration. But I argue it was very
clear that he was involved, and I'll read
it to you directly from Derek's article, which
is the the source material is there. So
I really think this is more of, like,
a misunderstanding
for some people in the in the chats.
Because somebody in the chat actually, and I
think I've included it, had a really well
thought out, like, thoughtful response about
and you could read it. I hope you
read it for yourself. It's long, so I'm
not gonna go through it now. That's why
I even didn't get into it in, like,
responding because it's like I'll I'll raise you.
I don't think Twitter is the space the
place to have these long form conversations.
But, nonetheless, the point is we're it's like
we're missing the larger point, which is that
however it happened, the only point we're making
is that more money ended up in the
hands of the WHO through Trump's administration
than was originally going to the WHO
directly.
That's the only point. And yet it gets
taken I people I think people just have
an interest in going after her to try
to make it seem and I it's, like,
not the person I'm gonna highlight next because
I I well, you can read it for
yourself. But largely the conversation is about just
going after her to kind of make themselves
look better. Typical.
Oh, is this the oh, that kid's right
here. So Robert Malone shared it, supporting her,
saying Whitney Webb provides a sober reality check,
which I'm gonna be honest. I mean, I've
said it already. I'm very there's a lot
of weirdness around Malone and a lot of
the overlapping with the injections and a lot
of stuff that I just you know, I'm
I'm just you know me. I question everybody.
But more I've seen a lot of stuff
that makes me worried that there's a lot
of this that is there are more going
on behind the scenes. Regardless,
he says
reality check. No. As incorrect.
Now this is the guy guy I was
talking about. I'm not familiar with the account.
Some for a smaller account, just simply says,
but she's actually wrong about it, but cite
somebody who is
I'll show you right now. Go clearly, in
using dishonest tactics to go after her in
plenty of other ways, a very clearly, blindly
supporting Elon Musk sycophant as far as I
can tell.
But he simply says, there was no change
in Gauvey funding in 2020. They announced he's
wrong, by the way. It's very clear. But
I simply said, nope. Feel free to check
the source material. Show show the article that
I'll go over in a second. Now this
is the response I was talking about. I
recommend you read it because he did it's
a great it's a thoughtful response, and what
he's trying to say
is essentially that she's false in this point.
But what he what he's claiming the overarching
point is, I think is not actually the
point the 3 of us are making. I'll
leave it there.
And and this person says, you're wrong. Here's
and this is in response to both of
them really, but I'm thinking more so, Alec,
this guy, Alexandros Munoz,
saying that you're wrong. Gavi did get increased
funding. And here's another article, by the way.
You can read it for yourself. It literally
says the US approved support for more funding,
and then they go unrelated to the claim.
Right? And this is where it gets interesting
is the point because, well, the claim is
not that they got more money, but that
they they
deliberately went through well, that's not exactly what
any of us are saying, at least in
my opinion. And this person says, did the
US increase funding to Gavi after the WHO
withdrawal?
Said yes or no. And he says, you
know as well as the an you know
as well the answer is yes, whichever packaging
it was disguised in. See, I'm I'm just
happy to see that there are people out
there that are objective and honest about this.
But this guy, here's the point. He says,
do you think they would've you think they
wouldn't have it if
do you think they wouldn't have if Trump
didn't withdraw?
Well, okay. Well, now we're we're stepping into
what's called subjectivity,
assumptive
areas.
And that's your response?
Well, we know they would've if you don't
know that at all. Do you think they
would? Well, I don't know, buddy. I can't
predict the future. I can't jump into parallel
realities and tell you what would've happened. What
we do know is that that's exactly how
it went down. They pulled money from WHO,
and Trump's administration gave way more to Gavi
than went to WHO.
Simple. But, see, you see, the reality comes
dripping through when he has to respond in
a way that goes you know, that shows
that it's subjective. He's making a choice to
argue this.
I think that's important, and this guy continues
to kinda berate him about it, which in
a good way. But he goes, she said
Trump redirected front. This is false. Well, I
don't think it's false. I'm of the mind,
I think, and I'll show you the evidence
that that was a choice. With Gavi and
Donald Trump and and Bill Gates and the
overlap, we all know there's a connection here.
Operation Warp Speed, Donald Trump, Bill Gates,
and Gavi thanked Donald Trump for the money.
But see, the point is you could argue
they just thanked him because it's his administration.
You see my point? But see, they don't
know it any more than you do, and
they're desperately trying to make the argument that
it didn't happen that way. Well, fine. You
could argue with the the point is the
money still went. That's what I find to
be important.
And here's another subjective response and same thing.
He goes, but she's right.
The the other response is is is wrong.
It's confirmed by Gavi themselves. And he says,
this is a completely different story.
Funding for COVAX.
Okay? Trump was against it. Nothing to do
with anything.
I mean, really?
Like, the idea that you could try to
pretend that you know he didn't want that
to happen, it's the same point I was
making before. That's childish, subjective, partisan
manipulation.
All we know is through his administration, more
money went. That's the story, guys. And you'll
see it from the facts.
I think that was it. The,
oh, and this this guy just includes more.
And so he's going
the the whole thing is back and forth
about this kind of the nuance of the
conversation. And they're arguing she was wrong because
she said this, and this is actually how
it happened. And he's reiterating. He says your
analysis is false. It's obvious. The US the
United States government funding increased to Gavi in
2020. You bet. It's on their website. There's
the screenshot right there. And we'll go over
it. And he says, did Trump redirect from
w two to Gavi? Not enough info. A
redirect doesn't have to happen the same day.
Exactly.
That's the point.
David Icke simply adds this saying, oh, so
Trump was going oh, and then my point
on this was so the argument is
that Trump said this or he didn't say
that, and the point is, guys, they lie.
I they lie to us on as a
matter of policy,
whether left or right or the illusion between
it all. And that's my point about showing
you this, is Trump said a lot of
things. In this case, he says Trump was
going to arrest Gates and Fauci for the
fake COVID vaccine, or at least that's what
his supporters were telling us. Right?
Didn't happen. So we just have to realize
how much BS flies around in this com
in every conversation that's important to where this
agenda goes.
But he goes and and he says he
claims to be the father of the vaccine
while pushing the same technology from the White
House on his second day. Worth searching Twitter
for all those who push this Gates Fauci
arrest nonsense. Or like every other q n
on overlap BS that ends up not actually
happening, He said they pushed they said Guantanamo
Bay for Gates, some said. To see who
was misleading you week after week, month after
month. Look him up. Alex Jones is one
of them, as he points out. Any comment
on hero hero Alex Jones?
Now look. It could happen tomorrow. It could
happen the day after that. It could happen
in 2 years.
That's always been the case. The point is
that we were still we told this would
happen right away like everything else, just like
it was supposed to happen 4 years ago
or any other time we've talked about or
any other a number of narratives.
At this point, I think it's quite obvious
after we had a great meeting with Gates
at Mar a Lago and everything else, the
evidence continues to show that's not happening. But,
yeah, you could always make up some story
and say, he only did that to make
him comfortable so he'd get him later.
That's you're playing fantasy at that point. Certainly
could be.
But here's the article that Derek wrote. 2020,
July 7th,
entitled vaccine bait and switch. As millions pulled
from WHO, Trump gives billions to Gates founded
Gavi. Now what you'll remember is that this
actually was picked up by Children's Health Defense
at the time.
And then it got pulled back.
You know why? Because people gave them pressure.
And this has held true even Gates even
or, RK even followed up later and and
reiterated that this was accurate. The point is
that they did that because I think there
was partisan pressure, which we're clearly seeing plays
a factor in his life.
Just think about that. Even back then, and
I think it's obvious why this why this
is all very important and even more so
right now.
But it says the latest numbers from fiscal
year 2018, numbers are not available for 2019
to 20 at this point when he wrote
this, show an estimated
$281,600,000
to the WHO from the United States. The
records indicate that after the US government, the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Gavi, the
vaccine alliance, that's what they're the gov what
Gavi is, are the 2nd and third top
financiers of the WHO.
Here, just takes you two points here. It's
not just about the funding itself. It's about
who ends up being in more a powerful
position.
The US defunded defunding the WHO
actually tightens the technocrats'
already firm grip on another global institution.
This means when Donald Trump stated the US
will no longer fund the WHO,
the Gates Foundation and Gavi
simply stepped into the top finance financial role.
So think about it. So at that point,
you could argue that as the top funder,
you would have more influence on what would
happen. Instead, he backed away and allowed Gates
Foundation and Gavi to be the leading influencers
on that platform.
Is that is that what we want? Like
I said, like, an interesting point to make.
Clearly, that seems to be by design, in
my opinion. And it says, this means when
Donald Trump stated that I just read that.
It says, Bill Gates is the top donor
and will continue to expand his influence and
dominance of the global health policy.
Scared so somebody like that is who we
want to be at the leading position.
Right? Even by even by default or by
you know, it's interesting.
But also remember that Donald Trump
took his advice in the last time over
RFK Junior. And now he met with him
again, and he claimed, which he has never
spoken out against, but who knows,
That Bill Gates claimed that Donald Trump was
very excited about essentially what what people were
claiming or framing as operation warp three two
point o. Gates basically said a another rollout
of, you know, the the the tech going
forward. And now here we are, cancer drugs,
mRNA,
exactly like we all warned about.
Now it says in early June, the Trump
administration declared support for Gavi to the tune
of $1,160,000,000.
Trump's support for Gavi came via the first
ever virtual global vaccine summit where Trump was
a part of.
Gavi stated that the funding will go to,
quote, routine immunization programs and will also help
the public private partnership,
quote, play a major role in the rollout
of a future COVID vaccine, which Trump still
supports to this day.
Now it says, during his short speech, which
you can watch right here,
Donald Trump stated, it's great to be partnering
with you.
We will work hard.
We will work strong.
Trump also called COVID 19 mean and nasty
and said it has shown there are no
borders. It doesn't discriminate. Well, that sure sounds
relevant to the globalist
world, you know, biomedical surveillance industry.
Technic
control structure we're seeing. I figured I'll grab
this really quickly anyway since it's important to
see Trump say this. And it's funny to
me. Right? So as people are trying to
tell us this is no. It's just the
USA. Well, then why is Trump literally going?
We're happy to partner with you.
It's only 37 seconds.
Gavi operates with great transparency,
and Boris Johnson is somebody with tremendous
respect for you and everything you do.
He called. He said, do you think you
could do something maybe around the Oval Office
or right by the Oval Office? I said,
why not? It happens to be right behind
me. As the coronavirus
has shown,
there are no borders.
It doesn't discriminate.
It's mean. It's
nasty, but we're gonna all take care of
it together.
It's great to be partnering with you. We
will work hard. We will work strong.
Send my regards to Boris, and good luck.
Let's get the answer.
Okay. So is anybody confused? Trump just literally
said, we're happy to be partnering with you.
So if you're gonna try to pretend that
he wasn't aware of the donation that they
were happy about, which is why they were
saying, come on, guys. Now look. I'm not
trying to say everybody in this conversation was
being willfully dishonest. I think the Alexand the
whatever that one the Elon supporter guy is.
My point is that I think people that
were trying to make the nuanced argument were
misunderstanding the larger point of what we were
arguing. But even on top of that, it's
very clear that he was also, I think,
aware of what was going on. And it
says Trump's support for Gavi was echoed on
the Twitter account for the United States aid
for USAID.
And that's just what it reads right there.
It's proud to be partnering with Gavi.
Now it says it was actually USAID who
first announced the pledge of the US $1,160,000,000
in February. The Trump administration included that $1,160,000,000
commitment
as part of the budget for fiscal years
2020, 2023.
The budget for fiscal year 2021
included
$290,000,000
for Gavi.
Remember that the records from fiscal year 2018
show an estimated $281,600,000
from to the WHO from the United States.
The Trump administration's announcement of an initial 290,000,000
investment easily
surpassed the US investment in the WHO.
Over the next 3 years, the US will
give more than 800,000,000
to Gavi for their vaccination programs. Once again,
this puts Bill Gates and his organizations at
the top of the global health pyramid. So
what did mister Gates have to say about
the success of the Global Vaccine Summit? He
simply says since its inception, Gavi has helped
vaccine vaccinate more than 3 quarters of a
1000000000 children. That's what they're funding, guys. And
now it's stepping up and saying it's willing
to deliver a COVID 19 vaccine as soon
as one is available to end the pandemic
as soon as possible. Is that what happened?
He says we must also renew our commitment
to delivering every life saving vaccine there is
to every child on earth. Yep. Now it
says the Trump administration's support for the development
of the vaccines to fight COVID 19 is
also visible in a more recent virtual event
organized by Global Citizen and the European Commission,
October on June 27th.
Now it says during that event, Kraft Kelly,
the United States ambassador to the UN, announced
the US commitment of $545,000,000
for Gavi towards the COVID 19 relief efforts.
At May 2020 virtual summit, also organized by
the European Commission, the Trump administration committed to
giving another $775,000,000
to taken together the May payment of 775,000,000,
the early June announcement of just the 1.16.
But, by the way, alone already surpasses by
a lot just the money that was taken
from WHO. So that alone makes the point.
But it goes that on and then the
late June gift of 4 545,000,000.
These taxpayer funded investments will provide abundant resources
for Gavi
and, subsequently, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
These funds easily outweigh the paltry 281,600,000
the US was giving to the WHO.
That's the only point we're making. You can
take whatever you want else from it. How
do you not see that that's how this
works? Now my point the only point we're
making is last time this claim was done,
it it went another direction. And they ended
up getting more money through the United States
Trump administration than they had been taken away
from or have been taken away. It's amazing
the kind of craziness you get from these
partisan misrepresentations.
Now Derek said, apparently, some people are triggered
about the facts of Trump withdrawing from the
WHO in 2020 and giving billions to the
gate founded Gavi. He said he reported on
at the time. There's the article, and he's
quoting and this is just another example of
this going.
It says I know I know, I know
you love and this is again, this is,
this Alexandros guy.
Look, your favorite black pill dealer.
God, guys, get some new material. It's it's
you don't realize how often I mean, whether
anyone of us you look at. Look at
the track record of what we've been saying
in the last 6 months for crying out
loud. Look at what's effing happening right now
and you're gonna try to pretend still like
we're just black pill? How I just god.
It makes me sad for some people. He
says, I know you love to try and
dunk on me, she says, previously over critical
comments of Musk, but you love to sim
for. But the US did increase funding after
Gavi in the same point, you know, and
then includes the t lab link right there.
Now on top of that, apparently, I haven't
got to watch it yet. Derek pointed out
to me in,
New World next week,
James Corbett and James Evan Pilato, both of
which you should be following, they they brought
up his article. They talked about it because
they're objective and nonpartisan and they like facts.
Now, interestingly, an overlap to this.
This is where we are now. Okay?
Kamis sharing this, just with quoting what they're
saying. And this is, Sania Nishtar, the CEO
of Bill Gates Gavi, the vaccine alliance.
Here's what they have to say.
Going forward,
we are entering our 6th 5 year strategy
starting 2026.
We're accelerating our work.
We will reach more children with more vaccines,
faster than ever before.
And not just more children, more individuals
because we have vaccines for we have the
HPV vaccine for adolescents as well. And who
knows? The TB vaccine is on the advent.
And we are significantly
accelerating our work.
And we are really thankful to, to our
donors. Prime minister, thank you so much.
At the launch of our investment opportunity,
the government of Spain
announced that it will at least,
commit to a
to a 25% increase. We're extremely thankful to
you for that.
Extremely thankful to the European Union and the
Berlin and Berlin Melinda Gates Foundation
for hosting our replenishment event.
And I think all of you are Gavi
ambassadors.
Really thankful to you for the support that
they lend to our work. Great. Great. So
just everybody there, world World Economic Forum, they're
all they're all Gavi ambassadors too. Like, there's
a clear overlap here. And we'll get to
it. Trump and every they Trump just gave
his speech
for the current said this is current, by
the way. This
is, the what what the, hashtag going around
WEF 25 or whatever it is. It's this
is current.
So I thought that was relevant. Right? So
all they're simply pointing out is this is
gonna keep growing. It's more and it's gonna
keep growing. And if you think for one
second with the group literally rolling out mRNA
injections,
proudly,
aren't gonna overlap with the group that wanna
promote those injections I mean, so what's the
disconnect here? That they just don't like Gates?
I mean, think about what you're saying. Like,
they're rolling out Trump is rolling out an
mRNA shot and promoting the same shot that
he always has. Gavi wants to sell those
for him, and they're gonna go no because
Gates is not on our side. Yeah. Sure.
That really lines up. Like, if they were
clearly not on the same side, they wouldn't
be meeting together. They wouldn't be working on
the same projects, but sure hope I'm wrong.
But here's what it says under Gavi US
government funding. And this goes over to general.
Right? Now this is you know, the United
States is a significant donor to Gavi. We
know the 2020, 2023. Right? It says this
is the the one we talked about. That's
the 1,160,000,000
that they gave specifically from USAID.
2024 to 2028.
K. So now we're talking about ending of
of Biden's administration.
Right?
So what's interesting is Biden has funded
through
Trump's administration,
right, for the most part. So you can
again, if you understand the way I view
this, I think it's back to part of
the facts that these whether they have their
differences in partisan wedge issue, these people are
in one agenda, and they're using partisanship to
keep you divided.
My point is that they they it's important
that they don't they if they need to
fund it, they can't have Trump do it
because then we'll call it out.
Don't don't Biden funds it at the very
last minute all the way through his administration
for another $1,580,000,000.
Now my point is if Trump didn't want
that, he could revoke that. Because it's not
all in one lump sum. It comes across
the so we'll see if he does that.
And if he doesn't revoke it, I think
that says something. I think you know what
will happen. But it says,
hey, it's a the first ever 5 year
commitment.
1st ever. That's my point. Why do you
think that is? I think it's obvious what
we're seeing right now. Then it goes on
to point
out, on this 2020 supplemental funding, you know,
overlaps we already talked about,
Derek's article. But then it goes 2021 to
2025 work plan.
The US government continues to support Gavi's ambitious
New York plan for 2021
to 2025,
which includes immunizing an additional 300,000,000 children and
saving over 8,000,000 lives. Right? So the overarching
point here, guys, is this is going through
Trump's administration in multiple ways. If he wanted
to stop the funding for this, he could.
And I think that's a relevant point to
keep in mind
for where this goes.
So it's funny to me how that stuff
gets so moneyed. And the reality is, it's
all, I think, at some level, not every
person knows they're part of it, but at
some larger level trying to suppress information that
that highlights the problems
of the person they want to be
their hero,
their savior.
Now this
is where we get into the the overlapping
executive orders before we get into an article
that starts this main point. And I this
is one thing we're gonna get into a
second, but it's because what somebody shared. And
this is Naomi Wolf saying, AI and cancer
mRNA vaccines right out of the gate. Really?
This is like, you know, I don't have
to try to make a point, but it's
like a lot of this stuff. It's like,
guys, damn it. You know? I said, well,
many of us tried to warn everybody
a lot.
You know, waving our hands, doing jumping jacks
well before the election time frame and got
called names for it. And here we are.
Now I it's I don't need I just
I I simply said, how about we just
work together and stop it now? Right? Let's
let's make this hap and I just think
it's so many people just don't wanna see
it. I'm not even talking about her. Just
people out there that just choose to ignore
because it's uncomfortable.
But Pauli said, the trouble is they'll be
on the next thing in a couple of
hours. Elon will do something in public and
actually
the and the actual danger to our society
and economy, lives will be old news. And
she's right. But what's interesting to me, this
person comments saying, but CNN says Trump is
okay now. I said, what? That's, okay. That's
what you know, I'm interested in the in
the continual
realization
that they're all doing the same thing.
That's my opinion, but I think it's pretty
interesting when you see this. There's CNN, guys.
Now this this article is about a lot
of things. It says, Trump why Trump's 2
white 2 days in the White House feel
like a full term. But here's what they
say about this. More organized this time. Now
there are criticisms in here, for sure. But
it says the shock and awe of countless
executive actions, which, by the way, is just
the way the government works these days. We
don't live in even a representative government anymore
when they can just hand out dictates
100 of 100 of 100 of go, and
then all of a sudden, the next person
comes in, does the same thing. The rest
of it's all show. That's this is this
is the way the government works these days.
But it says,
the shock and awe of countless executive actions
hints at a far more professional White House
operation
than his chaotic first term. My god. They
just said he was more professional.
New White House chief of staff, Susie Wiles,
was credited with adding structure to his can.
Most many people argue she's literally in control.
But, also, like the rest of them, a
blind Zionist Israeli supporter. But the bottom line
is this is
CNN saying Trump's doing well.
At least more professional if we don't agree
with everything he does. When's the last time
you heard that kind of, you know, we
disagree, but he's doing well. Like,
guys, there's a reason that he's supposed to
be supported right now, in my opinion. I
think you already know what that is. It's
what we're gonna talk
about
next. Doge News comes out and says, buy
order of the president. Doge is official. Now,
in case you didn't see this report we
already put out,
which was entitled, Israel repeat Israel repeatedly violates
ceasefire. The AI technocracy bait and switch, which
by the way is prescient in the point
that this came out after I was talking
about this, and the Doge deception.
So the point in this,
it says, what's the first agency you wanna
see audited? So here's Doge News who even
has access to the actual executive order and
still chooses to misrepresent what this is. I
simply said, they simply renamed the US digital
service Doge. Yep. Digital services. It's right there
in the dock. But they know most won't
truly read it. You're being played.
Nobody even cares.
It's crazy. Probably suppressed by Twitter. The bottom
line is that that's not what it says,
guys. It literally no. Who knows what could
happen going forward? But right now, it's just
the US Digital Services that has now been
renamed those. That's it. And on top of
that, that they are openly involved in digital
IDs and digital infrastructure. That's what their part
that's what they do.
And on top of that, you can read
it and it pretty much indicates that they're
not going to completely get rid they're going
to hire
they're gonna get rid of things they don't
like, but they're going to hire on. It
literally makes the point that it seems like
they're not gonna do well, again, it's when
action starts to happen, we can talk about
it more. I guess based on what they
say in there, I'll predict that all to
all we do is see growth of government
under the guys that that will help reduce,
you know, create efficiency.
We all know this, guys. It's really basic
stuff.
Now here's another one. And this response says,
can we do the IRS and then abolish
it because we have a new agency? External
revenue service? Oh, see, it's funny. I the
point was I just simply said the same
thing, that they're using an external revenue service.
Right? So now,
don't just have an internal revenue service. Now
you've got an external revenue service just in
case you're on vacation somewhere else.
Or no. Excuse me. It's about tariffs. But
how much you wanna bet? That's how it
works out.
Now Trump signed an executive order. You might
have seen this. Suspending all foreign aid for
90 days. Right? Everyone said, see, he's trying
to change all. He's gonna stop all the
wars. But guess what most people didn't notice?
Way down in fine print,
except for Israel
and Egypt and Jordan who are equally involved.
What's going on? Think about that, guys. So
you're gonna pull back and say, he's the
peace candidate, and he's stopping the wars, and
he's not gonna keep the Israel war going
and all these lies and promises.
And he he's first thing he does,
no more foreign aid. Never goes, see, except
for Israel.
That's actually what just happened.
It's it's just incredible to me. Barret in
the fine print was that Israel and the
United States Arab shield puppets regime of Egypt
and Jordan are exempt from the order.
So Trump made sure they would keep funding
the genocide.
Probably part of the secret deal they had.
Craig Molkheimer points out US Donald Trump on
his first day in office has already perpetuated
an act of genocidal complicity,
signing an executive order to protect from sanctioning
Israeli
settlers.
Some of which have done some of the
most horrific disgusting crimes since October 7th that
you can even that's the rape that burning
alive,
the torture.
But that's an act of genocidal complicity.
Now, this last one, this is in regard
to the,
most this one was called the protecting United
States from foreign terrorists and other
I kinda made a joke about this, but
it's really it's it's interesting.
So if you read this,
it simply says protecting United States from foreign
terrorists and other national security and public safety
threats. Now it doesn't really name anybody. It
doesn't name it doesn't name anything specifically. At
least I don't remember so. Yeah. I didn't
think so. It just simply broadly points out,
you know, foreign entities or people here that
support or in at this what the guy
even says right here,
who intend to support as they go, aka
thought crimes.
Think about that. That is what it says.
The idea that if you intend to support
x, y, and z or that, you know,
the point is that they can argue you
were about to do something. That's we need
to be talking about this for so long.
Espoused hateful ideology
or otherwise known as free Palestine as we're
already seeing.
My point though is the article or the
actual executive order doesn't really name anything. It
just says terrorists and they when people that
influence our government to outcome terrorist acts or
to, you know well, you know where this
is going. I simply said, Trump just signed
an executive order saying that anyone working with
or as a part of the Zionist genocidal
terrorist organization, the most obvious example of terrorism
on the planet, they will be removed from
the country.
Or am I misunderstanding it?
I simply said, I hope you can all
sense the sarcasm here. I do not for
one second think this is what Trump wants
us to read in this, but we all
know that's exactly what it should mean. Unfortunately,
I'd bet just about anything that is this
will be used to go after anyone criticizing
Israel. And one thing it does open the
door for is removing people in this country
who just have a different opinion.
Americans
or
foreign
students.
The point the way these things operate, they're
so ambiguous. The bottom line is we already
showed that where Trump said he'll remove these
people from the country because Israel wants that.
We're sure we're sure sounds like America first
to me. We're moving Americans from the country
because another government wants it. Or moving anybody
from this country because they're, you know, people
that are here on a foreign visa for
war for school.
What and then so then Israel doesn't like
what they say, so Trump removes them. How
is that America first?
Well, you know, this is all part of
the same conversation.
Now I wanna start with, this just because
I've already gone a little longer than I
wanted to start with all that.
I I I'll include I'm gonna quickly go
through this, but I think it's important to
see
this long thread of all the people that
were at the inauguration.
Now you might not you might think you
already know, but if you actually go through
this, I I agree. Orwell showed me this,
and it's like, this is actually wild. Like,
so we're gonna get to the, you know,
Malay and all the rest of these fake
libertarian discussions.
But, you know, you got people like, you
know, by the way, this is the president
of People's Tropical
China. That seems interesting.
The typical, you know, Dana White.
This one is the former This is, Murdoch,
Rupert Murdoch, Zuckerberg.
You've seen most of these, Bezos.
This was,
not representative of Dusty Johnson with Elon Musk.
Sam Altman.
Important, I think.
And other, you know, unimportant
Internet stars. TikTok CEO, which I found very
interesting.
Joe Rogan.
Apple CEO, Tim Cook.
Look at that. Biden. I mean, I mean,
Biden. Of course. But Obama,
Clinton.
Both Clintons.
Doesn't that seem weird? Like, how would that
make sense? They don't have to go to
those things. Right? Well,
always keep pretending like they all hate each
other. Right?
There's George Bush, Laura Bush, Barack Obama, Bill
Clinton,
McCarthy,
Margarithell Green.
This was the,
oh, just, just from,
India, representative of India, Nigel Farage. Oh, and
then, of course, we have the, rapist, Conor
McGregor,
Boris Johnson.
The ar oh, this is what's her name?
Kat. Yeah. This is just another picture with,
with Malay.
This is Victor Obron from Hungary.
Minister from Japan.
I mean, this seems really interesting to me.
Like, the what this is there's a lot
that that hangs around this right now, in
my opinion.
Douglas Murray.
All these men you know, this is the
aggressively pro Zionist.
Lit like, as dishonest as you can get
in this conversation, but has a certain kind
of a near to him that makes it
appear as if he's a this guy is
lying for Zionism like everybody else. Carrie Underwood,
Hulk Hogan.
Anyway, the point, you know, you can go
through it's interesting. Then it goes through some
of the positionings. It's a very interesting thing
if you look at this. And this is
more about the fact that you have, you
know, where people are seated.
Having these tech CEOs above the you know,
it's what this overall things begins to show
you guys is that we are in a
position right now where, as we're talking
about, these things are shifting.
We're watching as Garland Nixon called it, and
it ain't wake up, like a corporate reorganization.
I just think we need to be really
honest about what we're seeing and stop playing
partisan games.
And then on the same point about the
not about the people in his cabinet,
here's Marco Rubio.
Guess what his very first call was as
secretary of state
to Netanyahu.
A war criminal who's supposed to be arrested
if he ever shows up in this country,
and he calls him first.
And I simply said, MAGA, meet Mega.
The true agenda of the government you support.
Make Israel great again.
Now let's go through this.
This is entitled, welcome to America's techno military
future. Now I thought this was a pretty
good article. This this is from January 21st.
And it really just kind of highlights this
trend, the the organization we're discussing before we
get into
the entire point of the artificial intelligence mRNA
infrastructure they're building.
Now it says as he begins his 2nd
term, Trump links to the tech industry are
vividly clear.
Musk, to give one example, pledged substantial funds
to Trump's campaign. He was duly named colead
of the new government of department of government
deficiency, a role that enables him to directly
influence federal budget decisions.
Not to be down outdone, all the major
tech firms have donated 1,000,000 to Trump's inauguration
fund with everyone from Jeff Bezos to Tim
Cook enjoying front row seats on Monday. This
signals a major political realignment among Silicon Valley
elites. Traditionally, a hotbed of liberal progressivism,
which I think all this really shows you
is it's about power, guys.
That this game has been played for so
long. And when we get to, like, the
Davos point in a second, the idea being
that it's like they they like, what they're
trying to frame it as, the Joneses and
the rest, is look at them, went to
Davos to stick it in their face because
that's the best they can do. And they
get up there and they say the climates
the Paris Climate Accord are bad and there's
only 2 genders and they they all they're
doing is giving you very, very do you
think they care? Do you really think they
this is an agenda that leads to the
it's about the technocratic control structure that they're
rolling out.
The whole woke agenda was one or another
of a play to get you in that
position, and it's working.
Like, the idea that you think Trump standing
up or him standing up and saying, there's
only 2 genders and then making an entire
show, but, oh, they stuck at Tadavos.
Guys, it's just lazy.
Clearly, they're there and are also being supported
by it and definitely support the agenda. They're
doing it. They're rolling it out right in
front of you.
It's crazy.
But he goes on to say,
all of them there, the signal is a
major political realignment.
The ones that were once liberal are now,
but that's the point. They're not. They're just
shifting what needs to be shifted.
And it says, for instance, Zuckerberg says no
more fact checkers. Just like that.
Hey. It's just just silly, guys. It's me
right now, this is about trying to throw
you bones to keep you in line. This
is however, this is about more than p
mere political opportunism.
Taking a winner and adapting to the new
political landscape.
Welcome then to America's techno military future. With
private sector giants behind it, the US security
state will become more deadly than ever even
as their reliance on federal contracts exposes both
the hypocrisy of the tech bros and the
con continuity of Trump's policy program.
And, boy, it's kinda what we're highlighting. Right?
It's the idea that if this continues to
go forward, you're only gonna continue to see
more contradictions to what they want you to
think is happening and what they're actually doing.
The question is how long people will continue
to pretend it's going that's going the direction
they want.
As as long as they yell the right
words. It says American military and intelligence capabilities
have out been outsourced to big tech. Whitney's
been talking about this. Consider Amazon, a major
provider of cloud computing services to both the
Department of Defense and the CIA.
No less thinking no less striking,
Amazon has actively developed AI tools for logistics,
optimization, and battlefield analysis,
further embedded itself in defense operations.
Google's foray into military technology includes project Maven.
Right? We've talked about that, which uses AI
to analyze drone footage for surveillance and targeting.
Despite internal protests, people were resigning or leaving
the company because of it, Forcing Google to
withdraw from the project, the company continues to
provide critical cloud services to the government agencies
doing it.
Or info, we know they didn't even stop.
I mean, this is how this game is
played right now. And this is blurring the
lines between private innovation and foreign policy. That's
the Palantir overlap that I have to get
into here, guys. It it's it's all one
and the same at this point. Now, it
says no nor are the big tech firms
alone here with a new wave of what
they're pretending are smaller companies emerging in their
wake. They call themselves little tech. I mean,
and this is one grandiose manipulation in my
mind. It says, though they're actually worth 1,000,000,000
of dollars with their wealth often secured through
lucrative defense contracts. Guess what one example is
of what they're calling Little Tech?
SpaceX and Starlink satellite system. Yeah. Totally small
up and coming group. Right?
Guys, for crying out loud, it's literally overlap
with DARPA. And, like, they they are the,
like, military contractor that I can see right
now. And it says,
and they become indispensable for the US military
operations, providing secure, reliable Internet in conflict zones,
including Ukraine and a lot of other things
we've talked about. Yeah. They're a little tech
guy rising up in the field. That's about
as dumb as Trump calling small businesses McDonald's
during the during the
illusion of the pandemic.
Same kinda game, really. And it says Musk's
outfit is also developing a constellation of bespoke,
interesting way to frame that, spy satellite. It
means unique.
You like, one of a kind, really.
Spy satellites for intelligence agencies. Further strengthening its
role as a Nash in national security. And
we've talked about this guys. Or where is
it?
Oh, it's probably way down here. No. We'll
come back to it.
You know, the the article you, Matt, the
the one Derek wrote, and we'll come to
it in a minute, when when it becomes
more relevant that I lined it up myself.
The spat the satellite network that Elon Musk
is building. Literally, the National Reconnaissance Office says
we're building you can't hide because we have
eyes everywhere.
And that doesn't raise alarms for people talking
about the great reset and surveillance. Oh, my
god.
They probably just don't even know about it
because our content doesn't show up in their
feed.
Now, it says
on Onderil,
this is one of the groups that is
partnering with Palantir, working with OpenAI and SpaceX.
And there's many overlaps we'll get to between
Elon Musk and what's happening today, despite him
feigning disagreement with it, which we'll get to
my opinion.
It says, of course, Andrew Ellis, Whitney's covered
a lot is the founded by Palmer Lucky.
Another very nefarious aspect of all this does
similar work. Initially, gaining detention in its migrant
detecting surveillance towers.
It has expanded to build autonomous drones alongside
missiles,
robots,
and other defense technologies.
Yet no company epitomizes techno militarism better than
Palantir,
like the central tick embedded in the Trump
administration right now, established by Peter Thiel, who
received early funding from the CIA's venture capital
arm. He's developed his company in close partnership
with several US intelligence agencies.
Now it says, what unites these self styled
techno warriors like, the the point they go
over above this is how they're trying to
argue that, like, somehow it's, like, patriotic. Like,
remember Alex Karp in the conversation about, as
it says right here, the enemy should wake
up scared, go to bed scared.
That's the kind of thing they want you
to think of as, like, a pro, like,
a patriot mindset. Guys, that's that's authoritarianism.
That is literally an imperialist mindset being paraded
around as somehow pro America.
I mean, that's it's gross. And and he
just wrote a book about the whole techno,
like, they're rolling out the new future and
pretending, like, they're just trying to give you
free speech. And it's working for some people,
which is scary.
But they says these self styled techno warriors,
it's their belief that the US must use
technology,
especially artificial intelligence, to assert their country's global
dominance.
That's not a smencing word. That's what they're
talking about. And it says a development they
incidentally stand to profit massively from. Just a
coincidence, though.
Last year, Palantir even published a manifesto attacking
the Pentagon's established contracting practices.
Among other things, it said the Department of
Defense must encourage competition and speed up development
naturally by further opening up little tech. Of
course.
Right? You gotta get SpaceX involved. Otherwise, you're
not doing it right.
And it says, this represents nothing less than
a declaration
of war against legacy contractors,
especially once you recall that Palantir and Anduril
are reportedly in talks with about a dozen
competitors, including SpaceX, Chat GPT,
OpenAI,
to jointly bid for contracts from the US
colossal $850,000,000,000
defense budget, which actually goes well over a
trillion when you understand the full picture.
But what's interesting
and again, remember this was written on the
21st, I believe.
Is what we're talking about here.
Oh, and first when he says going to
war with, you know, I am not defending
legacy contractors at all. These are merchants of
death. But what's interesting is I do think
what we're seeing is a shift. Like, as
as we've talked about a lot, as Whitney's
written about, as we've talked about, and she's
written for both It's in her books, so
let me hang out for TLav.
Right? This interesting overlap between the differences where
you have you know, there's one agenda that
seems most are involved with. But even within
that, there's different factions that seem to bump
up against each other all the time. These
kind of older entities and some of the
new technocratic drive. It's it's interesting.
And I don't think anybody fully understands who's
in what side. It's it's all opinions based
on what we can think we can prove.
What's interesting though is that you can argue,
this is an example of that, where you've
got Palantir, like this new rising technocratic control
structure that's basically trying to push back all
these other, you know, that are not good
people. They're still selling bombs to authoritarian governments,
but
it's just they want that control for obvious
reasons,
especially since they blindly support Israel's agenda.
Interesting, though. Right? Either way you look at
it, the bottom line point is they're all
working together that I can see, especially the
overlap in what's happening today. But overall, that
they're telling you that they're trying to create
this kind of, like, cornering the market of
what's happening.
Under a guise that were, like, we're making
a consortium to bid together. It's a it
can becomes one of conglomerate, basically. And that's
between all the ones we're talking about. Ones
we can speak of is SpaceX, OpenAI, JOTGPT.
It says, at any rate, this activity underscores
the hollowness of the libertarian
anti status ideology espoused by tech bros like
Theo. Like, we know this. Anybody still pretending
that any of these things are libertarian are
just liars or don't understand libertarianism.
Just like the fake libertarian city we talk
about in Honduras. It's not even remotely that.
But they are doing this like the fake
freedom city game because they want you to
think their technocratic
globalist overtaking is somehow freedom.
Libertarianism.
Or whatever what whatever word you wanna hear,
it's that. That's the kind of game they're
playing.
But it says,
as much as they may claim to oppose
big government, the truth is the techno military
complex is wholly dependent on the state.
That alone shows you the illusion.
To cannibalize foreign markets, channel funding from security
agencies, and, of course, to wage wars.
And what better than an ongoing never ending
war? Right? It's clear that the techno military
complex will shape not only the new administration
but also American society,
exacerbating the growing interdependence
between state power and corporate interests. That's fascism.
The new president has presented itself as an
antiinterventionalist
as and as a candidate of peace, yet
his administration is closely aligned with companies reliant
on perpetuating
US militarism.
That alone should be a huge red flag,
but also since he's basically openly said, yes,
we're gonna keep supporting Israel. Yes, we're gonna
keep funding Ukraine. Both.
So let's keep let's let's just stop pretending,
guys. It says as long as corporations that
thrive on war continue to exercise influence over
American foreign policy, it's unlikely the country will
ever be able to kick its war hungry
tendencies. See, now that is what we try
to talk about in the illusion of the
2 party paradigm or the fake selection process.
That's the reason because it never stops. Because
they only give you 2 selects choices that
lead to the same point.
And that that's what we were trying to
call attention to. We got yelled back by
all the people still ignoring what's happening.
The growing power of the techno military complex
has domestic implications too.
That's where this really goes right now. The
surveillance technologies developed by firms like Palantir who
are currently working with Israel to commit genocide
are can obviously be deployed at home as
well as abroad. I think that's what that
they're talking about, guys. That's what they're rolling
out right now.
As indeed, they already have been. In 2009,
after all, JPMorgan
and Palantir or rather used a Palantir program
called Metropolis
to monitor employee data,
including emails and GPS locations
to spot signs of discontent.
Guys, that is the scary
future that we're gonna get to with Ellison.
And, you know, citizens will behave if they
know they're being watched. This is what they
think.
And so you can't you can't decouple these
things. This is eugenics. This is social engineering.
There's all these different overlaps. What we're seeing
here and a more so eugenics, I'll get
to in a minute with more better better
examples.
To show signs of discontent,
secretly tracking your GPS location as your boss
just to make sure you yeah. Well, isn't
that what the World Economic Forum is rolling
out? We'll get there.
Shock scarves and internal biometrics
being watched on your screens.
They're telling you this is your future. And
that the the World Economic Forum is currently
tied right into what's happening, and people just
don't wanna see it.
It says once again, figures like Peter Thiel
parrot libertarianism while profiting from authoritarian
surveillance technologies,
A contradiction
pose poised to haunt the new administration.
Hopefully, right out of the bat, right out
the gate.
Now, starting with cryptocurrency on this, I do
think it's relevant cause all this over very
much overlaps, especially since we talked about this
with
the IMA.
Kath, Miles and Fitz joined us in this
one as well. Co opting, which she's a
part of the IMA, but she's point is
that she's a central I think her voice
and this is important. Co opting freedom, the
Bitcoin sleight of hand, and the new AI
control structure. Guys, they're these are 1 they're
2 this is one of the same conversation,
really.
And now it's all rolling out. So I
think it's important to see this. And this
is what was just said.
This was on the 21st.
Do you intend to continue selling crypto products
that benefit yourself while you're president?
Crypto coin the other day. Do you intend
to continue selling, products that benefit yourself personally
while you're president?
Well, I don't know if it benefited. I
don't know how where it is. I don't
know. Oh, okay. So it might have lost
money like I was talking about, but that's
because it didn't work out. So no big
deal. Right?
What a dumb thing to say.
Much about it other than I launched it.
I heard it was very successful. I haven't
checked it. Where is it today?
Hey. You you made you made a lot
of money, sir. Yeah. He sure did. How
much?
I mean, several $1,000,000,000 it seems like in
the last several days.
Several billion? That's peanuts for these guys.
Okay. Yeah. Next question.
See, that's what happens when you don't have
people like Sam Husseini in the room. See
the point? See the difference? Chuckle it off.
It's about a funny joke. Oh, that's peanuts?
Yeah. How funny. How about that amount of
money could probably feed this whole country for,
you know, not even a joke, by the
way. I think the world, according to WHO,
for the longest time, could be fed, I
think, by $30,000,000,000.
Now that's not to say that anybody has
to cough that up or be obligated to,
but just think about what that means for
how much money these people throw around and
laugh it off.
And, yes, guys. That's a gigantic conflict of
interest. Wonder why he never signed his ethics
pledges.
Still nobody talks about that. I told you
this would happen. Now we're we're gonna get
into a very terrifying part of this where
you can see that Israel has his his
fingers locked in.
They didn't even have to divulge that, and
he's about to roll this out. Who do
you think is involved with all this? I
just think that's absolutely terrifying. And I'll I'll
grab I don't know if I grab it
later.
I think I did. But here's just the
article in case I don't have it later.
And the point is, guys, I still I
mean, you how long have I been pointing
this out? This was month like, a month
before that we got here.
Trump's admin's missing ethics pledges. It's both him
and,
I think, Pat one of the last I
checked was Pam Bondi and they all and,
like, headset, egg set. Why do you think
that is? They're not divulging whether or not
they have conflicts of interest. Chief among them
would be foreign influence.
That's what they've been talking about.
But where are all the democrats crying foul
and saying this is grounds to remove him
from off? Yeah. If that's what would happen
if the narrative we get told is true.
Now 0 Edge writes crypto rip says Trump
signs executive order creating presidential working group on
digital asset markets. Now it's funny as I
haven't checked since I was going live, but
what's funny is it went up it went
up a lot, then it went right back
down as far as I could tell. So
it's funny how they everybody rushed in and
be like, he did it. It's going up
like crazy and you know, but it's volatile.
These things go up and down. But it's
just funny to me that often that happens
where they write these articles, and by the
time they put them out, it's already gone
below the where it was to start. You
know, it's just funny.
The point in this is this executive order.
Now I you can read this if you
want. I don't think I highlighted anything. The
point is simply that we're put they're putting
this out,
and it confirms what we've been worried about.
Strengthening Americans' leadership in digital financial technology. Leadership
in digital financial technology. Now right out of
the gate, this is the only thing you're
gonna see per certain people focus on. It
explicitly states that CBDCs,
well, there's a caveat,
aren't allowed.
But remember what we've been talking about. Catherine,
Whitney, plenty of people that have really immersed
in this conversation.
It's more off more likely and even more
alarmingly so going to be a private version
of this.
JPMorgan coin, for example. Right? They they and
that there's an overlap there. We'll have to
wait and see how this plays out. I
hope that's wrong. But they've already made it
clear that this digital overlap is not going
away with a 1,000 different ways. Even if
it's some back end concept where you have
to have it access the app you need
for what, y, and z. We know that's
where this goes, or the save act point
with the border.
It's all there.
This is interesting. And don't forget, the Doge
is actually the US digital services, and they're
involved in the whole thing.
This is about
leadership in digital financial technology. So even if
you wanna say that we're not using a
CBDC, we're still talking about leading the field
in financial digital technology.
Here's what it says.
It says, there is hereby there established within
the National Economic Council and the President's Working
Group on Digital Assets Markets Asset Markets.
The working group shall be chaired by the
special advisor for the AI crypto chair. Oh,
it's David Sachs. Great. Alright. So a person
that we should be very concerned about. And
also overlap with artificial intelligence. So you see,
there's a very clear reason these things are
conjoined when they really don't have to be.
But it says within 30 days of the
date of this order, the Department of the
Treasury, the Department of Justice, Security, the SEC,
and other relevant agencies,
The heads of which are included in the
working group shall identify all regulations,
guidance documents, orders, or other items that affect
the digital asset sector.
Within 60 days of the date of the
order, each agency shall submit to the chair
recommendations with respect to whether each identified regulation,
guidance document, order, or other items should be
rescinded or modified
or for items other than regulations adopted in
in a regulation.
Only thing I wanna highlight from that is
regulation.
It's and and as you read further down,
the clear the point is and this is
which this says within a 180 days, they'll
argue which shall they'll recommend regulatory and legislative
proposals that advance the policies established. So they
want regulation.
You damn well know it's gonna work. This
is not gonna be an unregulated concept. So
my only point is simple. Is that talking
about Bitcoin or any of these things, the
reality of this field as it was truly
be as at least as I believe it
began, is about circumventing power structures.
Peer to peer exchange without needing. That's how
this was designed.
A a middleman. Now they're forcing themselves in
the middle because they're using it. It's not
about freedom they wanna frame it as. They're
co opting this like we talked about
and forcing in regulations.
Now maybe that's what people think is inevitable.
I don't. I don't want that. I don't
want the inevitable status society you all pretend
is the reality.
Anyway, it goes on to say, the working
group shall propose a federal regulatory framework governing
the issuance and adoption of digital assets,
including stablecoins
in the United States.
Guys, right there is the point. And this
is what Mark Goodwin's talking about. There's clearly
an issue here that's just kind of
jumps over the CBDC game.
I'll just show you what Mark said right
here. He said, so Trump just, quote, banned
CBDCs
with an executive order. But the same executive
order pushes
private issued stable coins to, quote, promote and
protect the sovereignty of the United States dollar,
which is supposed to be the opposite of
how this works.
See? And this is what we've been warning
about. Now, you're not gonna hear this talks
about discussed from people that wanna pretend that
he's stopping the great reset while speaking at
Davos. Right?
It's willful ignorance.
Now, it goes on to say the working
group shall evaluate, and we'll get into the
CBDC part right here. That but that's the
point he's talking about in regard to
the stable coins. The working group shall evaluate
the potential creation and maintenance of a national
digital asset stockpile. Well, there you go. That's
the Bitcoin stockpile and propose criteria for establishing
such a stockpile. Now, just the idea, first
of all, saying this is what we were
asking for
to evaluate how that would go. So it's
not like we're doing this tomorrow, but it's
still a step in the direction of what
we're worried about.
And it says, potentially derived from cryptocurrencies,
lawfully seized by the federal government through its
law. Oh, okay. So lawfully seized because before
you took control of it, it was pretend
you pretended it was illegal.
Very lawful. No. You're criminals and you stole
this from Ross Ulbrite you just let free.
The bottom line is they're just taking money
from other people that they stole for no
reason other than they deemed it illegal even
though they're now using it, and now they're
gonna use that. Now we can get into
a whole lot more here. I'll I'll I'll
include oh, let me read that first. But
I'll include the the interviews I recently did
because there's a lot to talk about in
this that goes away from the conversation today,
which is ultimately about where this really goes
and what they're doing here
is not it's not in your interest, guys.
Now it says prohibition of the cbdc.
Now here's what I think is hilarious
and inter and, you know, concerning.
It says the first thing it says underlined.
There's not even a link there. It just
underlines it. Except to the extent required by
law,
comma. That's how it starts.
Agencies are hereby prohibited from undertaking any action
to establish, issue, or promote CBDCs within the
jurisdiction of the United States or abroad.
Okay?
Except to the extent required by law. What
does that mean? I mean, guys, you know,
it's obvious what that means. That's a wide
open door should they want to. That may
not mean it's gonna happen. But what do
you mean? So let's just say they pass
a an oh, they write another executive order,
which I wouldn't even argue would apply. That's
not law in my opinion, but let's just
pretend. Let's use it the way they do
it. That's just that's the law today.
Well, then okay. So they they they write
an executive order. Now suddenly CBDCs are needed
for law. Now all of a sudden, despite
this, it doesn't matter anymore because, well, except
to the extent required by law. And now
law requires it, so it's moot.
Didn't that seem ridiculous?
I just it's it's not even what it
appears to be. And, I mean, he didn't
even need to do that. He could just
remove this executive order. I don't know. I
find that to be pretty ridiculous. And then
it goes except
except to the extent required by law, again,
any ongoing plans or initiatives
at any agency related to the creation of
a CBDC within the jurisdiction of the US
shall be immediately terminated, and no further action
may be taken to develop or implement such
plans or initiatives. Now as far as I
can tell, I'm not aware of any current
central bank digital currencies that are underway.
All I know of are actual very clear
private coins that are just as problematic, if
not far, far worse.
So you can take this as a win.
I mean, it's I like the idea that
you're at least stating, except to the extent
required by law, that CBDCs are a bad
guy, but it seems to have no teeth,
guys. So this is like going back to
the earlier point. You're gonna get people going,
see, he says it and you can't give
him credit for it. It's like, well, guys,
there's a looks it's it's toothless as far
as I can tell. So you just want
me to praise the thing you want to
believe is the case. If he came out
and literally, like, did this in a way
that was cemented as law or basically did
something else I thought was more definitive than
a flimsy executive order that only applies to
the executive branch, doesn't even actually affect the
world, I would stand up and say, good.
It's here. Just like I did with Ross.
And I would still say this, if it
goes forward, that will be good, but this
is a completely toothless point.
That's how that works. That's how it's how
rarely these things go that way. Again, Mark
pointing out that the
whole point is the sleight of hand with
it all. It's actually about the private issued
stable coins that are going to be the
problem.
I'll include my interview with Mark, by the
way. Here's the Mark Goodwin interview. Was Bitcoin
a government operation and can't still be used
to fight back? As well as my interview
with Mitch Bertram, how the government commandeered Bitcoin
and its decentralized future. They have a different
belief about how it started but ultimately have
a similar opinion about how we should be
using it to fight back.
Watch them for yourself.
Now, also the one the I May. Again,
Bitcoin's sleight of hand and the new AI
control structure.
Now, you're gonna see how these come together.
Now, just quickly to see so you hear
it from Trump's mouth. I'm sure you already
all have, just in case. Donald Trump makes
announcement on the AI infrastructure.
Back.
And we had a great first term, but
we're gonna have
an even better second term. And I think
we're gonna do things that people will be
shocked at. We're,
starting off with tremendous investment coming into our
country
at levels that nobody's really ever seen before,
and they're very,
happy with the fact that
I won the race and that they feel
confident in their investments,
and it's big money and high quality people.
Yeah. And you know who that evolves, guys.
That overlaps with everybody you think you know,
but also people that you don't really wanna
talk about.
It certainly matters who is doing the funding,
doesn't it? Including people like Mary Madison.
And that gets into what we'll talk about
more tomorrow in allowing
the illegal annexation
and the current ongoing breaking of the rules
and and or the ceasefire in Gaza, or
the continued creating of illegal bases in Syria,
or the rolling out of Israeli troops through
Syria, or the key violation of, like that's
what they've allowed according to Israeli media. And
that's because of funding of what he's talking
about. That's that's relevant. Don't you think?
So my first day back from from,
having a nice life,
it's my honor to welcome 3 of the
world's leading technology
CEOs. And in the case of Larry, Larry
Ellison,
it's
well beyond technology, sort of,
CEO of everything.
He's an amazing man and amazing,
businessperson.
But to announce the largest AI infrastructure
project by far in history,
and it's all taking place right here
in America.
Did he say businessperson?
Isn't that funny?
Certainly, it doesn't bother me, but I think
it's funny that people would love to make
a point about that for somebody else. Also,
just like that, he hasn't been speaking for
20 seconds. He's just coming back and he's
like Larry Ellison, Oracle, artificial intelligence, MRD. It's
that's why this took so many people by
surprise
because it's right to it.
As you know, there's great competition for AI
and other
things, and,
they're coming in at the highest level. We're
joined by Oracle executive chairman Larry Ellison,
SoftBank CEO,
my friend Masa Masa,
Yoshi's Son,
and CEO of OpenAI,
and I would say the,
by far the leading expert based on everything
I read,
Sam Altman. So, that's great that you're coming.
Isn't that interesting? Like, just the earliest point.
Like, it's just interesting to me that that
like, if there to me, it's obvious in
my opinion that there's this is a coordinated
sort of play
with Elon and Sam Altman. Like, are we
really gonna I mean, it's certainly possible that
Trump just like I would expect from Trump
in other circumstances to not, like, run this
by Elon. Right? That one that's actually pretty
it kinda fits what you think about Trump.
But at the same time, with all that's
going on,
when such a this is such an important
thing with Elon Musk being a central player
in the AI conversation, and we're gonna pretend
that, like, Elon wasn't aware of this, or
they didn't discuss this. I mean, come on,
guys. That seems really far fetched. Certainly possible.
So then he comes out and says that
Sam Altman's the leading character for artificial intelligence
based on what I read. Like, it just
seems like a really weird thing to come
across
based on what we know and the they're,
like, spending every day together. They live next
to each other. Like, I don't know. This
does not feel like it makes sense.
Because, of course, we're gonna get to is
Elon Musk making this big deal about how
Sam Altman is not real or it's not
gonna be happening or you know, and maybe
that's the plan. Maybe it's gonna roll back
into x AI because it doesn't work out.
Either way,
I think what we're seeing here is sort
of scripted,
which pretty much everything in politics is these
days. That's not even hard to wrap your
mind around. What we're gonna get into is
not just that it's happening like this, but
who these people are.
What what is SoftBank?
Right? What is Oracle? Who is Larry Ellison?
Who is Sam Altman?
World coin, OpenAI, Chat GPT. Like, what are
what are these things and why are these
important? Like, first of all, just on the
surface of it, things like Oracle
and and OpenAI,
these are big like, if this again, if
the any of this was happening with a
Democrat standing there, the very same people who
are telling you this is about freedom and
it's great and Trump saved more, they would
be screaming about the great reset.
And, frankly, a lot of conservatives already are,
which is making that point for us. But
it's the team sport manipulators out there that
just can't put this down.
And together, that's a massive group of talent
and and money.
Together, these world leading technology giants are
announcing
the formation of Stargate.
So put that name down in your books
cause I think you're gonna hear a lot
about it. Interesting choice.
Most of you probably remember, you know, metastatic,
goats dynamic, right? Like the we'll get to
it.
Interesting choice though, for this time, especially when
we're talking about the overlap of neuroscience.
I mean, sometimes you just can't
like, a lot of times in the past,
there's things like this where you you go,
wow. That's clear. It doesn't actually, at least
surface level, turn out to be what you
thought. But more often than not, when you
look back, it's like, yeah. That's kind that's
why they use that term. That's why that
comes together. Look at what ended up happening.
That's pretty that's kind of alarming to me
when you think about what the neuroscience things
we've covered about influencing people's thoughts and feelings
and actions.
Kathryn Austen Fitts is convinced that's currently part
of the discussion. James Giordano from the state
department and overropping US government are clearly telling
you, not only is that real that they
were rolling it out during COVID. He's made
this public. And so now we're talking about
Stargate,
which overlaps with which I'll just show you
real quick since I'm getting into it.
As,
Brad and Serkis points out as well as
Corey Diggs,
it is the secret military project that studied
remote viewing or psychic
phenomena for military and domestic intelligence applications.
It's just interesting.
That's kinda and it's kind of alarming.
In the future, a new American company that
will invest $500,000,000,000
at least
in AI infrastructure in the United States and
and very, very quickly moving very rapidly, creating
over 100,000
American jobs almost immediately?
Well, we'll see. They love to make those
broad claims,
but that's up to the companies. And, ultimately,
what they choose to hire very rarely end
up being what we think. Ask Elon Musk.
This monumental undertaking
is a resounding declaration of confidence in America's
potential
under a
new president. Let me be
a new pre He's reading and he loved
to do that when he loses his place
or loses his that's what I think. And
he kind of ad libs for a second.
He's he's he's like monotone when he reads.
But what's important to hear here, my opinion,
is that clearly I mean, this this is
a huge red
flag. The rolling out of AI infrastructure, $500,000,000,000.
What about the Americans that just suffered through
all the things that Republicans couldn't stop screaming
about because Democrats weren't helping them? Well, your
what how much could that make? It's the
same point.
What about the people in North Carolina? What
about the people you know, but no. It's
about a because it's all the same thing.
It's all the same direction, guys. The AI
infrastructure, $500,000,000,000.
This should be a huge deal, and most
people are uncomfortable with it because I don't
think this is what republicans expected to be
especially the overlap with mRNA.
President, I didn't say it. They did.
So I appreciate that, fellas, but it'll ensure
the future
of technology. What we wanna do is we
wanna keep it in this country. China is
a competitor, and others are competitors. We want
we want it to be in this country.
Competitors. We want
we want it to be in this country,
and we're making it,
available.
I'm gonna help. It's all about making it
about American interest. Right? So as long as
you can get people all cheered up about
how we're doing this for America's success.
So we'll succeed. We'll grow. It's they don't
care about you guys. This is about global
dominance. That's very clear.
A lot through
emergency declarations
because we have an emergency. We have to
get this stuff built. Ah, and even greater.
Oh, you need to clear it. So are
we really gonna pretend like you need to
declare an emergency? No. Because it's an emergency
that they get this done in a rapid
time frame because we're being built into a
Panopticon.
That's my opinion. But are you really gonna
pretend like it's not wildly alarming he's gonna
declare an emergency to do this? Or how
about we just told you this?
Remember the last show we just did? Oh,
well, it's about the border.
Oh, sure. They they said that out loud,
but then they made it very clear. This
is about the the fight with China. That
was what one of his advisers said. So
they're just playing you guys. They're playing you
every which way if you just take the
time to look.
So they have to produce a lot of
electricity,
and we'll make it I'll leave it there.
You guys, I'm gonna there's all the clips
you can get to. Like, there's a whole
lot. This is not that long, but he
brings up Larry Ellison. He brings them all
up to talk about this.
Thank you. Okay. Thank you, mister mister president.
Mister president,
we certainly couldn't do this without you.
We Yeah. I did that, by the way.
So make sure you hear that. Couldn't do
this without you, Jerome. Because right now, a
lot of these people, like Jones and the
rest, are trying to act like this is
somehow him being played. Typical.
Simply be impossible.
AI holds incredible promise for all of us,
for every every American.
We've actually been been working with OpenAI for
a while and with MASA MASA for a
while. Mhmm. Okay. So don't forget that. They've
been working together for a long time. So
this represents, in my opinion, the deep state
and Israel, and I'll show you why. The
data centers are actually under construction. So the
first of them are under construction in Texas.
Each building's a half a 1000000 square feet.
There are 10 buildings currently on you know,
currently being built, but that will expand to
20 and other locations be beyond,
the Abilene location, which is which is our
first location.
The kind of applications that we're building,
to give you an idea, maybe the most
charismatic and the one that I think touches
us all,
is,
electronic health records,
not just maintaining electronic health records, but by
looking at electronic health records, understanding
the condition of the doctors, better understanding the
condition of their patients. Medical precrime.
That's what we've been talking about for a
very long time. Now, yes, that comes along
with potentially positive outcomes too, right? Like like
Neuralink makes his arms work again. And a
lot of other very terrifying things.
Maybe he doesn't know that. Who cares? The
point is, it's clearly being rolled out, and
that's a problem. Now, I'm gonna show you
clips that everyone's talking about and we've talked
about before of him with Oracle. And I'm
also gonna show you Whitney's article about Oracle
overlapping with COVID 19 where this has been
his focal point for a while, getting his
hands on your data to use this to
train these models and to be able to
basically surveil everybody all the time, which is
exactly where this has been going. And Elon
Musk is building out the satellite network with
artificial intelligence as the US government just told
you during Biden's administration
because it's all one thing.
Now we can play more of that. I'll
include the link to the video for you.
There are some clips we'll get to in
a minute. But, again, here's Trump war room.
This is actually what it says for the
podcast. Breaking. Donald Trump announces the formation of
Stargate, the largest AI infrastructure project in American
history.
This project will invest $500,000,000,000
into the US economy and create over a
100,000 jobs.
Promise made.
Promises kept.
Like, first of all, this hasn't even happened
yet, dummy. Like, you can't say promises kept
if it doesn't actually come to fruition, but
that's the point. All we deal with are
words and statements. That's
again, I've there's studies about this these days.
The US political field is overwhelmed with what
they just last said. That's all that becomes.
Because tomorrow, it could be, well, the democrats
stopped us, and they still have police d
would've done it. You know, it's whatever.
Either way, how is that a promise kept
about even the old jobs? That's all you're
talking about? You're just gonna skip right over
the $500,000,000,000
AI infrastructure program? It's I mean, come on.
This is crazy to me. What people will
but you know why?
These, these accounts are not here to give
you truth. They're here to chill for an
account for an agenda or a person.
And here's OpenAI statement. This was posted on
21st, announcing the Stargate project.
The Stargate project is a new company which
intends to invest 500,000,000,000
over the next 4 years, building new AI
infrastructure for OpenAI in the United States. This
will begin deploying we will begin deploying a
$100,000,000,000
immediately. This infrastructure will secure American leadership in
AI,
which which means whatever strings are being pulled
through the US government is what that's talking
about, in my opinion, create 100 of 1000
of American jobs. We'll wait and see how
that plays out. Because, again,
historically, this is not how this I don't
mean with any industry we've seen. Because they
know how this works. They outsource.
Right? Or ask Elon Musk using some visas.
They get people that they argue like, that's
how this game always gets played. Ask these
locations where we'll get to a point in
a minute actually about, North Carolina.
They love to make these claims and they
they build these big things and then guess
what? They outsource
groups.
But it says create 100,000 of jobs and
generate massive
economic benefit for the entire world. Again, we'll
we'll wait and see.
This project will not only support the reindustrialization
of the United States, but also provide a
strategic capability to protect the national security of
America and its allies. Yeah. How's that working
out so far? How did the war on
terror work out? Oh, that's right. They aimed
it at you.
It's how this tends to go. You're their
concern right now. It says the initial equity
funders in Stargate are SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, and
MGX. SoftBank and OpenAI are the lead partners.
That's important.
With SoftBank having financial responsibility
and OpenAI
having operational responsibility.
So Sam Altman,
operational responsibility.
SoftBank,
which is the Israel connection, having financial responsibility.
Arm, Microsoft,
Nvidia, which we talked about, Oracle, and OpenAI
are the key initial technology partners. And so
Oracle being Larry Ellison and the surveillance
deep state dynamic,
The built the build out is currently underway
starting in Texas, and we're evaluating potential sites
across the country for more campuses as we
finalize definitive agreements.
As part of Stargate, the group you mentioned
will closely collaborate to build and operate this
computing system.
This builds on a deep collaboration between OpenAI
and Avida going back to 2016
and a newer partnership between OpenAI and Oracle.
Now, there's another point you made as well.
Just about the general concept. Do we even
want it? What is the outcome of this
project?
Sentient AI? Is that what we want? Is
that what they're I mean, that may not
be the case. Maybe they're not driving towards
some, you know, singularity.
But the point is that's where all this
seems to be aimed at. And it is
this this
beyond transhumanism
concept. And they all talk about this in
their inner circles. And they've written books. They've
talked about it. I mean, they're they wanna
put their mind in the cloud. We've Elon
Musk has talked about it.
So is that what we want?
Just because they go, here, we'll give you
some jobs on the way. Is that what
we want to be outcome? I just don't
know why this is what we think we
want.
That says all of us look forward to
continuing to build and develop AI and in
particular, a that's artificial general intelligence. That's kind
of what we're talking about. For the benefit
of all humanity.
I guess we'll just assume that.
Let's let's hope. Let's all stand up and
hope real hard that it works out not
in a bad way. Sounds good. We believe
that this new step is crucial for the
on the path will enable creative people to
figure out how to use AI. Yeah. That's
a it'll be fun for you.
It worries me, guys.
Greg Brockman from OpenAI, he's the founder and
co a cofounder and president. Thank you to
president Trump for announcing this project today. Just
wanna show you. It's clear. There's no way
you're gonna get this away from being Trump's
responsibility.
Now, Corey Lynn of Corey's digs points this
out. Everyone is gravitating around the mRNA story
line, which we haven't even gotten to yet.
We're just gonna start with the point about
the artificial intelligence, then we're gonna cover it
in 2 separate parts.
But she she's right though because what Larry
Ellison highlighted, I should've just played that with
the YouTube part.
I mean, I gotta do that real quick.
And being able to I'm not gonna take
a lot of time. I'm gonna I'm gonna
pass it to Masa, but care plans that
are much better than they otherwise would be.
A doctor in Indian,
River
Reservation
would be able to see how a doctor
at Memorial Sloan Kettering would would treat treat
the patient, or a a doctor at at
Stanford,
would treat the patient.
We actually provide all of that information, all
of that guidance to the doc the doctors
I think it's right here. Capture
it's right there.
One of the most exciting things we're working
on, you again, using the tools that's that
that Sam and Massa are providing.
So our Our is a cancer vaccine. Mhmm.
It's very interesting.
Early die turns out I'll be quick. All
of our cancers,
cancer tumors,
little fragments of those tumors
float around in your blood.
So you can do early cancer detection. If
you can do it using a you can
do early cancer detection
with a blood test.
And using AI
to look at the blood test,
you can find the, a can the cancers
that are actually seriously threatening the person. So
we can, again,
cancer cancer diagnosis
using AI as the promise of just being
a simple blood test.
Then beyond that,
once we gene sequence once we gene sequence
that cancer tumor,
you can then vaccinate the person,
design a vaccine for every individual person to
vaccinate them against that cancer,
and you can make that vaccine, the that
mRNA vaccine,
you can make that
robotically, again, using AI in about 48 hours.
So imagine early cancer detection,
the development of a cancer vaccine for the
for your particular cancer aimed at you, and
have have that vaccine available in 48 hours.
This is the promise of AI and the
promise of the future.
Can you believe that? Like, actually, can you
truly believe
on day, what, day 2, Trump rolls out
mRNA? Like,
nobody would have predicted that. I wouldn't have
said that would happen. I would have said
he would have at least soft pedaled something
more than that. It had there has to
be a reason for that, guys. And people
that are suddenly I mean, people that would
you people that were screaming about these things
are suddenly saying it's a good thing. It's
wild.
Or that or more importantly, which is what
we expect from the kind of cue overlap
is that, no. No. No. He's secretly putting
it in the spotlight so so we can
expose it. Right. By killing more children. So
then you can go, see. It's bad. Oh,
does that make sense? Right. Same thing we're
so so he's he's supporting the shot to
this very day to trick the Democrats. Right?
Is that the game? So he's allowing children
to die this whole time? So win like,
it just doesn't make sense, and you know
that. My point though is that think about
that. MRNA, like, maybe he said that it
wasn't supposed to. It did kind of feel
adlib there at the end.
Very weird. But let's go back to this.
So Corey's point is everyone is gravitating towards
that because it's obviously like, her point is
it's obviously not the or she thinks it's
not the main focus. And I do agree.
I think that the larger point with this
is the stargate point because it's it's well,
they're interconnected.
But on top of that,
arguing that almost maybe the mRNA statement was
made to take the attention.
That's a very good point actually because nobody's
confused about mRNA right now. It's a it's
been very much talked about. Now the only
point is that Trump doing it seems weird.
That's why you're getting this kind of mid,
you know, partisan narrative around it.
But she says everyone's gravitating toward that storyline.
I get it. But it's the massive surveillance
data centers that should be at the farm
the primary focus.
Once those go up,
they can do whatever they want.
The custom jabs are a distraction. Now, I
don't think she means in the sense that
it's not important or that it's not real.
Simply that they're using something they know would
catch your attention in order to hide the
to bury the lead, essentially. Sorry, I'm hiccups
all of a sudden.
But here's what she said.
Honestly thought it would take longer than 24
hours
to prove my point.
But here it is. Trump announces Stargate AI
infrastructure project with colossal data centers.
The irony,
calling it Stargate, the name of a former
CIA remote viewing project.
They're building massive AI data centers for full
surveillance in the digital control grid,
partially under the guise of saving people from
cancer.
It's just it's crazy. But the overall point
she's getting back to is saying that this
is, you know, the the AI infrastructure
is important to this part as well. So
it's like, this is the real fight right
here, guys. And this is what we've been
talking about.
So I agree with her.
And then this is just Brent and Kirkus
is pointing out. You can do this little
video if you wanna watch it about the
Stargate. And here's the Wikipedia screenshot
saying it's a secret US army unit and
this is where they get the point from,
you've seen the movie, they they manage their
goats. That's kinda what this is meant to
be a play on. And it's really about
them trying to tap into some kind of
psychic phenomenon and stuff like that.
It's an in it's a terrifying overlap actually
for what we just talked about with neuroscience.
But here is the actual report. This is
just one again, like I've talked about, oh,
highlight is gone. So we'll go here.
What I talked about before, this is I'm
not even familiar with the platform really. I
think I've seen it before. It's called, tech
dogs.
But it was just the place that it's
one of the articles I saw first and
I read through it. It seems to be
encompassing.
Now, this is what it says about the
overarching
the the bigger picture. It says the on
his first day back in office, president Trump
announced and outlined numerous plans and executive orders
that would immediately benefit the tech industry,
not America per se. But it says this
wasn't much of a surprise considering how vocal
Trump supporters,
Trump's support for the sector was even before
the election
day. Furthermore, his inauguration was attended by tech
and world stalwarts like Musk and Bezos and
Zuckerberg and Bernard Alt, Arnott, and, Sundar
Pichai,
from,
Google and Tim Cook from Apple, Sam Altman,
TikTok, everybody else. Crazy, guys. It's a real
I I think frankly unprecedented.
And it says adding to his 1st day
day's revoke of ex president Joe Biden's 2023
AI executive order
that looked at monitoring rapid growth of artificial
intelligence technology. So I find that interesting. That's
you could argue that's Biden concerned about it.
I don't believe that. I think the guys
again, I think they're all it's a tit
for tat
game. Good guy, bad guy. Right? Good cop,
bad cop. I think that's how this is
played. But either way, it's interesting that the
very people that are talking about the secret
democrat, you know, woke UN WAF WAF agenda,
which is all the more or doctrine I'm
talking about here, even though it's not one
side or the other.
Biden has an executive order that sort of
says, well, let's monitor this. Let's make sure
we're doing this right, even though I don't
believe that was their intention. And then Trump
removes that and rolls out the $500,000,000,000
plan to roll out as fast as possible.
This is just I use just so many
points right now. They're crazy. It says Trump
revealed a rather big AI project that re
ropes in some of the biggest names in
the industry.
Now under the Stargate project.
It says, at the Roosevelt Room at the
White House, president Trump announced that OpenAI, SoftBank,
and Oracle would come together to boost AI
infrastructure in the country. The move will be
carried out with the formation of the new
joint venture known as Stargate, which consists of
an investment of 500,000,000,000
that will be used to build data centers
and other necessary
infrastructure for chat GPT maker OpenAI in the
United States. I guess we're just putting aside
the totally not DARPA XAI that Elon Musk
is running. Even though I bet you that
comes back into play, I think they're overlapped,
interconnected, if not one and the same. I
don't mean literally, but I mean, like, the
point is, like, these agendas are interlinked.
But well, and there's each one of these
points, I wanna jump to them now. But,
well, all of the stuff I have lined
up are a bunch of different points. One
of which is the interesting point I made
about North Carolina.
Remember, we just talked about it. It's very
interesting how this all comes together that now
it suddenly makes more sense why Google
and face or Google and Microsoft and Apple
all randomly built these massive data centers in
North Carolina,
spruce pines.
The place from the sent epicenter of the
storm. And I'm not even saying you have
to believe they're interconnected. But it's fascinating to
me that that story with the courts we've
been talking before, and now I think we
see why this is all been happening. Remember,
that's about the I'll just show you real
quick.
Tiny Backwater Town, North Carolina will help the
fuel the world's AI revolution.
My nobody wanted to talk about that, and
they were all focusing on the lithium conversation.
It doesn't seem to even be that it
wasn't the way they presented it. Aubrey Miles,
Aubrey Merrill
having to contact before this ever started.
So we'll come back to this. I think
it's fascinating to me how this all comes
together.
But going forward, it says, the $500,000,000,000 investment
will begin with an immediate deployment of 100,000,000,000.
The remaining amount spread over the next 4
years. In this regard, ground has already been
broken in Texas. And again, Elon Musk seems
to be claiming that's not true, apparently. I'll
show you in a second.
For the 1st data center, while other potential
sites around the country for campuses are being
evaluated,
Stargate plans to construct 20,
20 data centers through through the project.
These are, I mean, $500,000,000,000,
20 different massive AI data centers.
I mean, you really think this is not
gonna impact your your day to day life?
It says, as per the release,
the project will not only support the re
industrialization
of the United States, which you may think
that sounds good. Not in this way.
But also provide a strategic capability to protect
the national security of Americans and its allies,
such, you know, such as controlling narratives and
influence and conversations and for you know, like
Israel. That's one of their allies. Like, it's
funny. You you plenty of other ways you
could look at it. Saudi Arabia, for example.
But the point is that's interesting that what
they're really talking about is controlling
for their allies.
But the reindustrialization,
like, the idea that this is in any
way gonna benefit Americans is yet to be
seen.
They love to float these ideas as somehow
bringing us back to what we think we're
productive.
Most of this takes from you.
They talk about the universal basic income. Where
do you think that comes around, guys? Because
of what they're rolling out right now.
Doesn't have to be the case, but that's
where that comes together. And it says SoftBank
CEO
Masayoshi
Son,
which is, you know, Masayoshi.
Oracle cofounder Larry Ellison, OpenAI Sam Altman, who
were alongside Trump, revealed the project was, wouldn't
have gone forward without him.
So that's interesting. Right? They all said it.
Every one of them. They wouldn't have happened
without your win.
So what's funny to me is that I
think a lot of conservatives don't want this.
And so what's funny is they're literally going,
Kamala wouldn't have done that, which I don't
agree with. I think either way this went,
which I think was only gonna go the
way they wanted, it would have happened because
that's what they want, the government.
Funny though, right? Because it seems that most
conservatives are kinda like, this is pretty uncomfortable.
But it says SoftBank CEO will be the
chairman of Stargate. Okay? So not only is
SoftBank running the financial side of it, they're
the chairman, the chairman of Stargate. And you'll
see why this is important. The CEO anyway.
Stargate's inter in, initial
technology partners include Arm, Microsoft, Nvidia. We've talked
about all this over there. Building OpenAI's existing
partnership with a primary backer, Microsoft.
The release mentioned that OpenAI will continue to
increase its comp its consumption of Azure. So
we've talked about all of these. Microsoft, Bill
Gates overlap, Azure, the comp the quantum computing
dynamic that's overlapped with all of it. These
are all problematic things that we've been highlighting
forever. And it's like you just jam together,
like, the most red flags in one conversation.
And yet we're pretending like this is not
what it is. Right? Trump War Room says,
jobs, we did it. That's it.
Wild.
Now it says under the agreement, building an
open a building on Open AI's recent new
large Azure commitment, that's Microsoft, That's the quantum
computing dynamic,
which will continue to support all OpenAI products
as well as training. You know, the same
the very group that Elon Musk just told
you was gonna end the world. That's crazy.
The new arrangement comes with changes to cloud
computing capacity,
Where Microsoft was the executive exclusive provider of
data center infrastructure for OpenAI to train and
run its AI models, the new model will
offer Microsoft a right of first refusal
for new cloud computing capacity requirements of OpenAI.
I just think in, you know, it's not
it's Microsoft is not just Bill Gates. The
point is or even explicitly.
The point though is that there is a
connection there.
And if this wasn't Trump overlap, they'd make
that point.
Now it says despite the new developments, the
key elements of the partnership between the two
remain in place for the duration of the
contract through through 2030.
I guess it's just a coincidence that this
very much part of the great reset, World
Economic Forum, sustainable development goals, all that,
that Trump's totally not involved in even though
he just spoke at Davos for WEF.
I guess it just is a coincidence that
the plan goes right to 2030. Right?
How many things can you crew truly ignore?
Despite the new developments, the key elements of
this partnership between all of them, including Trump's
administration,
remain in place for the duration of the
contract through 2030.
This includes Microsoft accessing OpenAI's IP, enjoying exclusivity
of OpenAI's APIs being deployed on Azure. And
Microsoft remains a major investor in OpenAI in
terms of funding and computing capacity along with
revenue sharing arrangements.
Sounds great for them.
Now, SoftBank.
Didn't know what I'd find. I mean, I've
I've I've talked I think I've talked about
them in the past, but this I just
found really stand out.
SoftBank
has significant connections with Israel through various investments
and partnerships.
The company has invested in several Israeli tech
firms.
Additionally, SoftBank has taken a stake in Ourcrowd,
Israel's most active venture capital firm. So remember,
they're the financial side
of this whole venture.
They're running the finances.
You could literally argue this is Israel through
one of 1 of a 1000000 different start
up in tech overlaps or financial fields that
are influencing through this.
Now that's you could you could decide for
yourself. But if you can't by now recognize
how that's not something that needs can be
dismissed, I'll show you yet again, how clearly
they state this is what they do and
they do it for the state of Israel.
They being just people in these start up
companies. Many of them overlap almost all with
unit a200 and their intelligence aspects.
But it says the start strategic partnership aims
to help promising Israeli start ups grow
into international tech champions.
We already talked about Israel's global cybersecurity infiltration.
Right? Or the infiltration in tech around the
world or their stated purpose around all of
this.
So the point is their SoftBank is has
taken a major stake in one of their
lar the most active venture capital firm, and
their stated goal is to grow that startup
group that is influencing
for Unit 8200 Intelligence,
their control over the market.
That's their statement.
Furthermore, SoftBank has appointed Yasser Cohen. You've heard
of him before. The former head of Israel's
intelligence service, Mossad.
How many of these can we ignore?
SoftBank's Vision Fund 2 has also invested in
Cyber Reason,
a US Israeli cybersecurity firm that Whitney's talked
about that we've covered on the show.
I guess it's all just coincidence. Right? So,
again, SoftBank running the financial side, SoftBank chairman,
the CEO of the entire project.
You started to get concerned? I hope so.
Now I'll include an interview with Whitney from
2023
entitled
CIA Mossad linked surveillance systems quietly installed throughout
the United States
in 2023 and well before.
So now you're adding the artificial intelligence overlay
to all of this with everything else we've
talked about, and it's far more than just
surveillance.
And here is an article that Whitney wrote
in 2020.
Cyber Reason announces new plans to accelerate
access to US government networks ahead of 2020
election. And it says a cybersecurity firm tied
to Israeli intelligence doing an 8200,
coincidence. Right? That sim that simulated a Siri
a series of terrorist attacks occurring on the
US 2020 election has announced a new hire
with deep ties to the US intelligence and
defense communities with the goal of gaining greater
access to US government networks. And here we
are. And now even more is happening.
You just can't ignore all this stuff, guys.
Now going further,
SoftBank adds a $100,000,000 to the US Israeli
cyber firm, Cyber Reason.
So this is an Israeli firm that has
literally
infiltrated
US surveillance tech and their and
point is the SoftBank, again, CEO
is the chairman of Sergei and their and
their finances they're running the financial side of
it.
If you the over the intertwined element of
all of this.
So if you if you're if you're not
picking it up by now, the idea is
that if you have an Israeli intelligent entity
that is working its way through all these
things into this country, then you give them
control over some massive artificial intelligence program over
all of it. I mean, this is the
point. This is what we're calling the the
technocratic panopticon.
There's no coming back from this, it feels
like. And I'm worried about that. And here,
Yossi Cohen,
SoftBank enlist ex Masaad chief as investment adviser.
Surprise, surprise. And you may recognize him because
of this.
I've shown you this before. Masaad chief visited
Doha, urging Cutter to continue Hamas financial aid.
So the literally, the guy that went to
Cutter to petition them to keep funding Hamas
for Israel, because that's always the reality. They
funded him right up until October 7th. It's
been admitted by Haaretz.
It's the same guy that's working for SoftBank,
who's literally in control, SoftBank is, of the
finances of the entire project.
And he's advising them.
Seems concerning to me.
Now David Icke hears this.
This is the guy behind the $500,000,000,000
Trump AI Stargate project who wants mRNA fake
vaccines for cancer.
Larry Ellison.
So we're gonna talk about Oracle. But this
part overlaps with Israel because of what he
says right here.
Now remember, Israel is committing a genocide.
Their government
has been doing this for 76 years.
Hopefully, you've come to terms with that. So
when anybody starts to say that they blindly
support whatever Israel does or the IDF or
that's what they support.
Either they somehow don't know that, which I
find really hard to believe, which is certainly
possible though, or or they do and they
don't care. But either way, they support that.
And these people are committing a genocide.
The Zionist Israeli government. Not every Jew, not
every Israeli, but clearly the Zionist government.
And so we have to be concerned about
people that are currently having this much power
who might have this kind of opinion.
Well,
the renewal of the Jewish states,
is is something that I I think touches
all of us.
For 2000 years, we were a stateless people.
And now we have a country No. That's
known as Judaism.
It's not a nationality. It's a religion, and
that's why. When Zionism co opted this and
turned it into something they could manipulate, that's
why orthodox Jews today argue that this was
a bastardization of Judaism because God, the second
coming has not happened yet.
That's what they mean. But see, this is
the game they play. And so my point
is people like this, I they know they're
lying. That's what I believe.
Of our own,
defended by all the brave men and women
of the idea.
So anything we can do to support them
who, you know, devote their lives
for for preserving,
the state of Israel,
keeping the people safe,
and allowing our state to continue
in in in in very sometimes in very,
very difficult situations. Did you visit Israel? I've
I have been to Israel.
I have been to the border.
I have spent time to the people who
govern the state of Israel.
And, you know, I feel a deep a
deep emotional connection, to the state of Israel
and the Israeli people. You are an high-tech
person. What do you think about these really
startups and high-tech
phenomena? Oh, well,
In case you didn't hear the question, he
literally asked him about what we just talked
about. What do you think about these really
startups?
And that's what he's asking. He's asking about
the conversation around this concern about all these
Israeli startups and the reporting about how they
are basically cutouts for Israeli intelligence. He didn't
say that. But I get the sense, it's
my opinion, that that's what he was asking
for based on numerous reasons, but here's the
answer.
You know, after Silicon Valley,
there's an area it hurts Herzalia
is Herzalia. So based on Theodore Herzl, the
founder of Zionism, who was a public atheist
who was very hateful towards Jews. It's in
his it's in his own writings.
They'd love to pretend that's not true. Probably
got more startups than any other place other
than Silicon Valley in Northern California. Oh, wow.
So there's, we've actually acquired a number of
Israeli companies.
We have 2 CEOs at Oracle. One's name
is Safra Katz, and she was born in
Israel.
So,
again,
we love the country love the country of
Israel, and we'll do everything we can to
support the
Right. So just because this person's Israeli does
not mean
they're compromised,
does not prove
that they're a Zionist. Let's be clear about
that.
But it should matter today with what's going
on, especially with the real picture about the
infiltration of tech. And I'll read the quote
for you yet again directly from the Israelis
in unit a to 200 making this statement
that that Whitney wrote the article for.
But the point is that it's important to
see. If if it was China and you
had just as much evidence, it wouldn't be
that we hate Chinese people. It would be
that look at what their government is doing.
Look at how they stated that they're influencing
you because of this. Right? And you could
argue that making some xenophobic argument would hide
that, and it probably would. Doesn't change the
fact that it's not about their ethnicity. It's
about the fact that they're doing this. And
that's the whole game that's been exposed through
all
this. That doesn't mean there's no racism, guys.
Of course, there is.
Now here is what written I've read this
before. This is Whitney's article for TLAB from
2023, The Prince and the Spy. Now it's
about Erik Prince and an Israeli spy and
this very old and Comframe Solutions, one of
these companies. But in this case, we're just
talking specifically about a larger point, and this
this reference is Black Cube. Remember, that's the
group that was hired by Weinstein, its former,
in quotes, Mossad agents, that literally harassed his
victims,
surveilled his victims and harassed them and tried
to get them not to speak publicly. Nobody
got held accountable for that, except Weinstein. I'm
talking about the people that did this though,
through Black Cube. So that's one of many
elements that are directly tied to Israeli intelligence.
Now it says Black Cube was specifically outed
as an Israeli intelligence front organization in 2019
article published by Calsilis
Tech. It says that some article
also could that same article, excuse me, also
contains the stunning revelation.
And there's the link. I'll show you real
quick, by the way. This is what happens
when you open it.
Hey. It blurs the line between defense apparatus
and cyber security. Oh, look. It's not gonna
happen now. Oh, there it is.
I don't have any ad blockers open right
now. That just happens to me anyway.
Sorry. Web ad blockers. Well, too late. Too
bad. I have it
on this article anyway. But it says,
stunning revelation that many Israeli companies, including Block
Cube,
have been founded
founded as fronts for Israeli operations, intelligence operations
since 2012
in the United States. It states that, quote,
since 2012,
cyber related and intelligence projects that were previously
carried out in house
from the by the by their intelligence group
in the Israeli military in house in Israel
and Israel's main intelligence arms are now transferred
to companies that in some cases were built
for this exact purpose. But other cases are
real companies, but they're still used that way.
The article also adds that in quote, in
some cases,
managers of development projects in the Israeli military
and intelligence arms were encouraged to form their
own companies
when they took over the military and or
intelligence projects. So they literally get tapped to
take over an actual intelligence project, and they're
then convinced to make a company to work
it through.
I mean, this is reported blatantly by sources
that are that this is people in the
unit 82100.
It's very clear. Now they've written articles on
your start up nation and all these different
things, like the idea that this is there's
building out the tech industry. Well, they you
just heard from him. Like, literally, that maybe,
if not even larger at this point, is
the one that they're doing in Israel. Like,
you have to consider these things. Now it's
not just bad because it's Israel. It's a
reality of what is driving this bus at
the moment and how we can see what
they're doing in the world. On top of
that, what they've been doing for 76 years.
And it's it's
it should matter to you if you have
if you're not blinded by partisanship.
Because it's not about left or right, guys.
It's about murder. It's a genocide.
Now Julian Assange
adds that we we've played this before already.
This is shared by Afshin Ratzani from Going
Underground. And this is just simply showing you,
Israel is currently using artificial intelligence to murder
people, to assassinate people.
As just understand, as they roll out
an Israeli influenced, if not controlled, artificial intelligence
infrastructure in the United States.
Here's what he had to say.
From prison. I see that artificial intelligence,
is being used
to create
mass assassinations.
Where before there was
a difference between assassination and warfare,
now the 2 are conjoined,
where many, perhaps the majority of targets, in
Gaza,
are bombed as a result,
of artificial intelligence targeting.
The connection between
artificial intelligence and surveillance,
is
important.
Artificial intelligence needs information
to
come up with targets or Right. Ideas or
propaganda.
When we Right. And so, of course, they
could frame it as we're just doing this
to help you with x, y, and z.
And maybe they are. Maybe that it leads
to maybe that part of it. But then
they can also use that data for damn
near whatever else we're talking about. And maybe
the person that designs it doesn't even mean
it that way, but then somebody else does.
Right? Like, you could the point is it's
irresponsible,
naive to pretend like this is not going
to become a problem. Like, literally everything else
they'd ever rolled out for the interest of
America, guys. Like, I shouldn't say it like
that. But just, you know, the point is
that we see all of these projects
in living memory, like anything about wartime or
anything about you know, it's it always ends
up being used in some way against us,
even if there was a positive outcome in
some cases.
That's what we have seen. We need to
learn from our own history or as they
say, we'll be doomed to repeat it. Talking
about,
the use
of artificial intelligence con to conduct mass assassinations,
surveillance data from telephones,
Internet,
is key to training those algorithm.
Yep. Exactly.
And that's why you're gonna roll out this
mass infrastructure.
Now, on back of that, don't forget,
Palantir that we just highlighted is working with
Israel as we speak to commit genocide in
Gaza. Peter Thiel's Palantir, Israel agrees strategic partnership
for BattleTech. Alex Karp right there with him.
Clear, guys. That's Peter Thiel and Alex Karp
Palantir right there telling you that they're working
with Israel on January 12, 2024.
An objectively
obvious
genocide.
They still don't care about that right now.
And last time Peter Thiel got asked about
it, he he could barely he could even.
It was pretty uncomfortable. Clearly, he does not
wanna talk about it. So let's not forget,
Lavender is the one that gets more attention.
The AI machine this is 972 magazine from
Israel. Lavender, the AI machine directing Israel's bombing
spree in Gaza. That's both of these I'm
gonna show you are what,
Assange is talking about. But there's this one
which came which came out first,
November 30th. A mass assassination factory. That's a
direct quote from an IDF member doing it.
Inside Israel's calculated bombing of Gaza. 1 of
them, habsura, and one of them is lavender.
Right? One is for buildings, one is for
people, and they are mass assassinating
this society.
Now
Azure.
DARPA selects Microsoft to continue the development of
a utility scale quantum computer. Reported.
Quantum computer,
reported
February 8, 2024.
K. So I'm what I'm highlighting here, first
of all, you we've talked about Azure more
than once. The point is that DARPA
is an interconnected aspect of this. And another
point I'm gonna make is why I think
that it's actually more interconnected than we realized
through XAI and Elon Musk and how this
all comes together, if not both training the
same thing.
The point is this is showing DARPA working
with Microsoft and Azure, which is part of
this group that's currently working with OpenAI. Now,
it says United States government renews funding to
Microsoft Azure Quantum based on recent results and
detailed plans for building a quantum computer, a
program run by the Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency. So DARPA is literally running the program
that is through Azure.
I think that's relevant.
Now here is Whitney's article
about Oracle
and how this all comes together, which also
overlaps with DARPA. Like, I think DARPA clearly
as historically pretty obvious is a central thread
through a lot of these defense defense advanced
research projects clearly.
But this is called Google and Oracle to
monitor Americans who get warp speeds COVID 19
vaccine for up to 2 years.
Now, guys, this is quite literally what I
think, like, an early part of what we're
seeing right now.
And and you know what? Frankly, like we
talk about in the past, it very well
could be that this is already done. And
this is just about normalizing us with this
reality,
which I don't think is the case. I
think there's a lot more to be done.
But, nonetheless,
look at what they were talking about in
2020.
Whitney wrote this for the last American vagabond
on October 15, 2020. Here's what it says.
During an interview with The Wall Street Journal
published last Friday, and this again was 2020,
the, quote, captain of operation Warp Speed, career
big pharma executive Mansef Salawi,
confirmed that the millions of Americans who are
set to receive the project's COVID 19 vaccine
will be monitored via incredibly precise, direct quote,
tracking systems
that will, quote,
ensure that patients
each get 2 doses of the same vaccine
and to monitor them for adverse health effects.
Now that's not VAERS.
That's not anything we've heard about. This is
what Whitney and I have been talking about
from the beginning because they were really explicit
about it.
This is their own program that we have,
as far as I could tell, yet to
see data from. Because I think it proves
what we all know. But it says, Salawi
also noted that tech giants Google and Oracle,
that's Larry Ellison,
have been contracted as part of the tracking
system, but did not specify their exact roles
beyond helping to, quote, collect and track vaccine
data.
This is simply an early aspect of, I
think, exactly what we're dealing with here. Because
they were use they're using their SIM programs,
and they're collecting all the data, training their
models.
Now why haven't we heard about the information
from this? 2 years of pharmacovigilance is what
they told us.
It says the day before The Wall Street
Journal interviewed was published,
The New York Times published a separate interview
with so with Mansa Salawi, where he referred
to the tracking program as a, quote, very
active pharmacovigilance
surveillance system. Which by the way, could simply
mean surveilling anything. In this case, we're pharma
we're doing it for injections.
The point is it could be applied in
any way you want it to be. This
was simply just rolling it out.
2 official
Operation Warp Speed documents released in mid September
state that vaccine recipients
expected to include a majority of the US
population, which is ultimately what happened,
would be monitored
for 24 months
after the first dose of the COVID injection
is administered. And that this would be done
by a pharmacovigilance
system.
Why does anybody talk about this?
In the Operation Warp Speed document entitled
from the factory to the front lines, of
course, because the front lines being you, that's
how they see this,
the Department of Health and Human Services and
the Department of Defense, of course, because it
was a military program that we like to
forget about,
stated that because warpspeed vaccine candidates use new
unlicensed
vaccine production
methods
that, quote, have limited previous data on safety
in humans,
the long term safety of these vaccines
will be carefully assessed using pharmacovigilance
surveillance and phase 4 critical trials.
Yeah. How'd that work out?
See, that's a either that was a lie
or something shifted. Because the point is, we
now know for a fact these things were
designed to be deadly.
Either whether you agree with that or not,
deadly. I think we can all agree on
hopefully at this point. And so what they're
telling you is, look, we're we're doing this
to make sure we can find that out.
And then we here we are. Not a
word.
How do you make sense of that other
than this was either designed or that they're
hiding that from you? That's Trump I'm talking
about. Because this is his program with Mansef
Salawi. Mansef Salawi was not part of the
democrat side of this. And it says, it
continues, the key objective of pharmacovigilance
is to determine each vaccine's performance in real
life scenarios. Another way to remember to look
at this is you were being tested on,
which is what we were telling you. Because
that's what that says. We're finding out if
this is there you go. And they did
and then never told you anyway.
Now, this is just saying FDA officials stated
in September that they were barred from attending
the the Operation Warp Speed meetings relevant for
the next part. The point is that even
the FDA was boxed out of this for
the most part. It was this was a
military program. That's why
it explains a lot of what we talk
about here. And we we had a great
interview with Destiny Resend Revent,
I did this last time.
Reventez, I believe.
Well, you should I recommend you follow her.
She does excellent work.
Resendiz. I was gonna say Resendiz for some
reason. Maybe I'm dyslexic, but it says destiny
Resendiz interview the military intelligence hidden hand driving
the COVID 19 injections.
Include that for you.
So the point is that the FDA were
barred.
I know, by the way, the quote up
here about
pharmacovigilance and literally telling you that we're gonna
put it in you and then test it
to see how they've hurt anybody. That's directly
quoted from their own material.
And and the links are always in there
in the article right here.
But it goes on to say the extreme
secrecy of operation warp speed has affected not
only the FDA, but also the CDC. As
a CDC expert panel normally involved in developing
the government's vaccine distribution strategies was stonewalled
by Matt Hepburn,
Operation Warp Speed's vaccine coordinator,
who bluntly refused to answer several of the
panel's pointed questions about the highly secretive operation.
Yeah. That went on to kill a lot
of people. So, how else do you read
that?
Remember, again, the point is we're gonna get
more into it, but it's AI infrastructure
and an mRNA
program
as as one presentation.
So, here we are
overlapping both in COVID 19. It goes on
to say, while Michael, Mansef Salawi and Warpspeed
documents provide few details regarding what this tracking
system would entail, Salawi did note in his
recent interview with the Wall Street Journal that
tech giants Google and Oracle
had been contracted to collect and track vaccine
data as part of the system.
So is it really that is it a
coincidence to you that we're back there again?
It shouldn't be. This is the plan.
Now it says Oracle is a long time
NSA contractor
and has ties to the CIA dating back
to its earliest days as a company, not
unlike Google. Like, think about how wild it
is. We're supposed to pretend this guy's fighting
the deep state when he literally collects more
obvious or let's just put it this way.
More very clearly
the examples that we would argue would best
represent what we would consider the deep state.
People that work with the NSA, the CIA,
government contractors, technocrats, Zionists
across the board. People like Google
CEO,
Apple CEO. I mean, really? Like, you how
many there are only so many you could
pretend that we're all just switching sides now.
And even if that is the case, weren't
they just peep you were just spending 4
years telling us they're villains. Now because they
side with you, it's okay?
No. That doesn't make any sense. For it
means you have no integrity, and I think
that's what we're always talking about. But it
says,
in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks,
the US military attempted to institute a surveillance
program
so invasive that congress defunded it just months
after its creation due to such public outrage.
We've talked about this many times.
Total information awareness.
The program sought to develop an all seeing
surveillance apparatus
managed by the Pentagon's DARPA.
Seeing a connection here? And officially argued that
invasive surveillance of the entire US population was
necessary
to prevent terrorist attacks,
bioterrorism events, and even naturally occurring disease outbreaks
before they could take place.
Well, gee, that's exactly what Larry Ellison just
said.
So the point is, here he is again,
and here they are again, rolling out the
same agenda. Because I guess it didn't work
as well last time. Or now that they
have more ability to just force in the
AI infrastructure.
But remember,
total information awareness was the government side of
it.
And I think the whole game is to
get you to go, not that. And they
go, okay. And then they roll out Palantir,
which was the private version. So get ready
for your private CBDC version of that or
however whatever the agenda ends up being, as
long as it rolls out through one of
these tech giants that claim they're doing it
for freedom and libertarianism,
some of these people will ignore it.
But that's what happened. And what you've covered
that a lot. They that is the same
program, guys. Just through private entity, which are
they even private? Seeing as how they got
funding through In Q Tel, which is CIA?
I mean, it's just it's it's the same
it's x a I from DARPA
going away and then becoming x a I
for Elon Musk. Even the same name for
crying out loud, which I don't think is
by accident.
We'll talk about that again in a second.
Going forward, it says
where were we?
Yeah. It says before it was disbanded,
Total Information Awareness sought to collect Americans medical
records. That's what he was just talking about.
Fingerprints,
gait, like the way you walk. Financial or
facial and iris biometrics data. You realize every
single one of these different parts have been
accessed, like Sam Altman doing the Worldcoin thing
for your iris scan. Like, each aspect of
it
meets one of these requirements.
It says you're even your drug prescriptions and
even DNA in addition to citizens' financial travel
and media consumption habits.
T I total information awareness, not unlike operation
warp speed, was a public private partnership
managed by the Department of Defense and partnered
with the NSA, the CIA, and other intelligence
agencies, as well as the private sector and
academia.
So exactly like Warp Speed and exactly like
what's happening now.
Coincidence?
Also like Warp Speed, total information awareness officially
justified its invasive surveillance goals by claiming that
the its initiatives
would rescue Americans from the invisible enemy
of faceless terrorists abroad and ensure citizen safety,
security, and health. Or how about now today,
the invisible enemy of the pathogen?
Today, Warp Speed officially takes aim at a
new type of invisible enemy. A microbe invisible
to the naked human eye. Or maybe smart
dust. Or other naked to the visible eye
dynamics. You know, whatever you want. Or nothing
at all. It's the same point.
Despite congress officially defunding the program, it later
emerged that TIA was never actually shut down.
Its various programs having been covertly divided among
the web of military and intelligence agencies that
comprise the US national security state.
One of which being the privatized version, which
is Palantir. The point here, guys,
is what I was just saying. You just
divvy it up. Each one achieves their aspect
of it. Maybe even with compartmental decentralization where
they don't even know what they're doing it
for. It, nonetheless, amounts to, which I don't
even know if I agree with it, but
it, nonetheless, amounts to the same outcome.
It says, unlike in past years, TIA's apparent
successor, Operation Warp Speed, has received no pushback
from mainstream media outlets or advocacy groups, organizations
with many of these same entities now placing
blind faith in the secretive initiative and lionizing
it as the only way
to resolve the COVID 19 pandemic crisis.
Same thing happened now. Gotta beat China or
whatever else it is. It's all there's always
a rationale.
The national security state has carefully learned from
and studied its past failures.
While many Americans, in contrast, continue to place
their trust in the very agencies and government
entities that have lied to the country into
multiple wars, torture and maimed countless civilians abroad,
well before what we're dealing with today, by
the way, or even COVID 19,
forward, produced a series of failed states in
order to plunder their resources
and are currently facilitating the pillaging of the
American economy by Wall Street and the Federal
Reserve under the guise of relief.
And which, by the way, this is 2020.
You know, it got way worse after this.
Allowing these same entities to surveil and track.
See thinking now and then, guys,
To track and surveil a majority of Americans,
if not all of them, by the way.
And to use the country's population as guinea
pigs for unlicensed, unstudied, and experimental vaccine technologies
like today,
cancer ones included, is a clear recipe for
disaster. And guess what? Now they already know
that.
At the same time, it would also enable
a surveillance panopticon
so dystopian and far reaching that Americans stand
to lose not only their few remaining civil
liberties, but even sovereignty over their own bodies.
The total surveillance agenda that began with TIA
and that has been resurrected through Warp Speed
pre predated COVID 19 by decades.
As and and making the same point that
you can see it continuing beyond it.
Its architects and proponents have worked to justify
these extreme and invasive surveillance programs by marketing
this agenda as the solution
to whatever Americans are most afraid of at
any given time.
It has very little to do with public
health and everything to do with total control.
Exactly.
Now, as we're talking about the rolling out
of these in the infrastructure programs
or rather the the, you know, data centers
and which is what they just told you
was happening.
From everyone breaking this down. Right? I wanna
highlight re again,
this interesting point.
So if you don't remember this story, this
is about the North Carolina aspect. Now this
was the literal epicenter of the storm, whatever
you think about that.
So my point then was simply that, you
know, you have people that are claiming this
was engineered, but I wouldn't dismiss. I I
don't think I've proven that, but I think
I certainly possible.
And then it was aimed at the lithium
plant because the great reset. Okay. Funny how
they're able to subjectively,
assumptively make those connections.
But then when other conservatives, which they were,
were like, what about this? Look at look
at spring you know, thinking, hey, my god.
I just found a huge story. All the
conservatives are gonna nope.
Funny how that works when it's not something
that supports the agenda.
But my point is all the big influencers
ignored this. In Spruce Pines,
or is it with plural? No. Spruce Pine
without a s.
That was even more in the center of
the storm.
This is a location as this article covered
on March 25th.
Tiny backwater town in North Carolina will help
fuel the world's AI revolution. Seems quite relevant,
doesn't it? With enough quartz powder,
well, it quartz to powder, but it's called
a quartz powder. Quartz to powder entire
entire $530,000,000,000
interesting amount,
$500,000,000,000
semiconductor
global industry.
So think about
that. Arguably over the next 4 years spending
more than the entire global industry. Anyway, the
point is
this quartz powder, if you read the article,
is coming from this town in the world
at this level. There's only one place apparently
in the world,
according to this article, that this comes from,
and that is spruce pine in North Carolina.
Think about ignoring that while pointing at something
more lofty. It's just wild. Doesn't even mean
that's necessarily connected, but it's interesting. Now, what
I found interesting as you read further into
the story, as I covered here,
the reality of this is that this town's
been taken over a long time ago.
I think there's only one thing up here
I highlighted.
Oh, just the name just the place. So
the title is the ultra pure super secret
sand that makes your phone possible.
Spruce, it says,
Spruce Pines, California,
North Carolina.
Now, do your Read into this. It's wild.
And it even You can get the similar
aspects other places, but the only place in
the world that has this level that's needed
for this industry.
Now, here's what becomes interesting.
Oh, and this, this was written,
where is it? On the 2018.
Okay? So, the point is that this has
been going on.
And it says,
for all the wealth that comes out of
the ground in Spruce Pines
Spruce Pine area, not much of it stays
there. Today, my the mines are all owned
by foreign corporations.
That matters. They're highly automated, so they don't
need many workers.
Now this is about mining for,
so this isn't necessarily greater the jobs point
for for the centers.
But same kind of dynamic
though since it gets brought up. But this
is different. It says they're highly automated. Don't
need workers. Now there's maybe 25 or 30
people on a shift. And with this does
actually make it relevant because in the article,
they make the point that when they sold
them on these things, they promised jobs, which
they never delivered. That's usually how it works.
And it says, now there's maybe 25 or
30 in a shift instead of 300. The
air the area's other jobs are vanishing.
We've had 7 furniture factories here when I
was a kid. Today, we we had knitting
mills, making blue jeans, nylons. They're all gone.
And so you basically have this AI industry
tech center dynamic taking over their town and
not benefiting them at all. And it says
median household income in Mitchell County where Spruce
Pine sits is just $37,000
a year, well below the national average of
51,000.
20% of the country's 15,000 people the county,
excuse me, county's 15,000 people, almost all of
whom are white, live below the poverty line.
Fewer than 1 in 7 adults even have
a college degree.
Find people way find
people find ways to get by. Glover
has a side business, the person they're referencing,
simply growing Christmas trees on his property.
He's this other person makes up running a
website nearby a community college. One of the
few new sources of jobs are several huge
data processing centers that have opened up in
the area. Attracted by the cheap land, Google,
Apple, Microsoft,
and other tech companies have all opened up
server farms within an 8 hour's drive of
this town. Now I think it's really interesting
how much you wanna bet there's other people
in this list that we could talk about.
It says, in a sense, Spruce Pine's quartz
has come full circle. It says, when you
talk to Siri, you're talking to a building
here at Apple Center in Spruce Pine.
That's wild.
So I genuinely think
I genuinely think that ultimately this is about
the building out of this that's been happening
for a long time, And there's more going
on than realize that we're just being, you
know, psychologically manipulated all over the place.
Now, here's a couple of clips that relate
to this before we get into more of
the specifics of the actual,
Ellison part, but then at the or m
mRNA part as well. Polly shares this. Larry
Ellison who did who just did the huge
AI data center deal with Trump, one of
them anyway,
explains what he wants to use the data
for.
Now, this is a the this report is
from 20 24 October. So it's not it's
not full that old. It says it sounds
like they wanna track people's biology from cradle
to grave, which guys, that's what they've been
saying for a long time. Now, take technically,
that was at least part of what the
total information awareness was. Now we're at the
biomedical side of this, which is internal. We're
remember we talked about the the
Internet of the bionano things? The bio the
the this is what we're talking about. They
are actively discussing internal biosurveillance
and have been for decades.
I'm not gonna get too far into that
now, but my god. I mean, I really
should. There's just so much to get to
today. We've talked about this so many times.
Charles Lieber,
Bob Langer. The work about the optogenetics and
magnetogenetics and where the injection side of this
is going with mRNA and ferret nanoparticle. This
is the same overlap neuroscience conversation.
But we've we're talking about this from the
internal biosurveillance side, not just the influencing your
thoughts and feelings and actions, but just being
able to monitor everything in your body all
the time. Your biometrics,
your heart rate, you know, all the different
stuff we've talked about.
And I, again, I don't even think we
fully grasp what this will mean, as I've
said many times, in a much more
technocratic future.
But here's what they said.
The the
we've been building large datasets of one sort
or another, but hooking them up around individual
patient issues and understanding in more detail
why this person got colorectal cancer and that
person got prostate cancer and
and and understanding
the elements that have come together to do
that. You'll only achieve that if you can
get substantial data in the right databases,
use AI to interrogate that. So I think
it's interesting because the answers may already be
there. We just haven't winkled them out. Well,
I I think I think the the answers
are there Yeah. Especially now with the new
gene sequencers. Yeah. Because we we think
we've, you know, we've been seeking sequencing,
genomes for a long time, but what do
we mean exactly by sequencing genomes? We mean
getting that the base pair of sequences. Yeah.
And but there's a lot more in the
genome than a bunch of base pairs in
a row. The methylation of of the For
the listening, that's right there. Like, this is
about
using, the guys and maybe even the genuine
feeling. I don't fully agree with that. But
the guys or feeling of helping you,
but in the process, helping them.
Right? Breaking through this technological or this, I
guess, biological overlap technological feat of
the mapping of the genome. Like, all these
different exam like, the point is this is
where they go
using artificial intelligence technology to essentially, you know,
break how would you frame this? Like, this
overlaps with both the artificial intelligence part as
well as the kind of biological aspect of
kind of, like,
what's the right word I'm looking for?
Demystifying. No. There's the
he's unraveling the mysteries of the human body.
Right? The point of the the as as,
Harari,
ah, what's his name? The World Economic Forum
guy talking about technocracy. I'll play a clip
at the end. But that that's what he
talks about. Like, once you can do that,
then you can control it. Right? You can
you can reproduce it. Like, that's where these
people are trying to drive towards. Now I'm
not explaining it well enough because I'm losing
the words. But the point is as he's
talking about this, they're using this data
to figure these things out,
which is not something I think is something
we should be cheering on from a tech
company that's overlapped with Israel and everything else
that's going on. And it's not even just
about Israel or Zionism. It's about any powerful
entity being able to use these things for
their benefit at your expense.
DNA molecule.
Thank you. Thank you. It's
Yuval Harari. You guys know the the name.
Out of the, control sequences of of the
DNA molecule fuel and and the epigenetic changes.
The changes over a lifetime of that methylation
is really the story of our lives and
how it changes,
and we've really never measured that. We've never
gathered that data. Yeah. And now we have
the tools with,
you know, the modern third generation gene sequences.
We can gather that data. We we have
our own the omics data is much more
comprehensive. So we can gather the data, and
then we have this incredible tool over here
called AI,
which looks for patterns, and it and that's
what it does. It looks for patterns in
the data,
and anomalies and anomalies in the data,
and can help us interpret that story of
life.
And,
it will allow us to deal with an
awful lot of diseases
of aging with the epigenetic exchanges as we
under as we understand it better. Or aging
in general. And an awful lot of diseases,
if you will, are diseases of aging, which
which cancer is so much more prevalent
as as we get older.
There you go. So, again, the point is
an eventual it's it's a transhumanist point. They're
not even really hiding this when you dig
into their discussions, their books, and their writings.
They want to serve they want to surpass
humanity.
And this gets into a really alarming conversation
with with Courtney and I've talked about. Like,
this this I this internal, like, Silicon Valley
tech elitist mindset that they're sort of, like,
becoming god. It's terrifying.
And so here we are with the idea
that they're breaking this stuff down. Yeah. We'll
help you cure some sickness and stuff, but
we're gonna end up creating a world where
we can feel like we are omnipotent.
Most well, many of them already do.
Or,
immortal is the ultimate idea in a technological
sense.
Now, this is another example.
Now, I think watch I think this was
the
similar no. Just another clip of the same
point. She's just who needs actual human doctors,
Polly, again, when we've got Oracle's care information
system. Listen as Trump's new data center partner
explains how AI will help
doctors make clinical decisions by sending them articles
written by pharma research teams.
Right. We all saw how that worked out
during COVID 19. Right? The manipulation of the
controlled, you know, you're supposed to listen to
CDC type information that wasn't manipulating everybody.
The system itself is more it's more like
a care information system.
So if you're looking for
it will look for patients with similar symptoms
and a similar back and similar backgrounds,
whether it's genomics similar genomic signature,
similar similar phenotype,
all of this stuff, And it will search
all the literature,
and all the electronic health records, and and
and inform that doctor
that other doctors
have had success treating similar patients in the
following way. Now, obviously, you could argue there's
a benefit in that of being able to
consider other actions, but we see how the
medical field works today. So to me, today,
that drives to conformity of of the controlled
narrative of all we're supposed to do. Look
at what happened during COVID 19. With what
he's talking about, all that would do was
help consolidate that control to where you're not
you don't look what the AI said. Right?
Do the PCR test. Put the ventilator on.
Like, that's what that leads to. But, I
mean, like, you could objectively still argue that
that's a tool that could be utilized in
an honest way if you but that's not
the world we live in right now. So
I'm not saying to ignore it because it's
bad. I'm just I mean, ultimately, I am.
But I'm saying in the current feet context
of where we are.
Like, because you like, where we are currently,
we have these things being used under guise
of helpful,
you know, that it's becoming helpful, but ultimately
still gets weaponized against you. So, you know,
it's it's sad that we live in a
world where we can't go, yeah, like, anything
like that. You know? What are it's the
same point I think about, like, vaccinology in
general. If what we believe
if what we've been taught, which is a
huge if is accurate, there's still probably ways
that you could make something that might benefit
somebody if it's not being forced and it's
their choice. My point is in the world
today, that doesn't even seem to be possible
right now. So you see what I'm saying?
Like, so it's interesting.
So it's very close to giving care advice,
which we don't do. But it will but
it will provide information to doctors.
They can see that there was a supporting
article in the New England Journal,
a Pfizer article that came out, or a
nerve wringer disorder article about. Pfizer. Great. He
even mentioned Pfizer. Let's give him a vaccine
company's opinion
that might benefit them in a monetary way.
It was epic about, you know, what you're
what you're prescribing.
It's wild. So here's another one.
1984.
Says, I don't think people understand the amount
of data that Larry Ellison controls.
This should concern you considering he advocates for
regime change to circumvent law and thinks that
the NSA spying on you is essential. Right?
Didn't Donald Trump just tell you, get the
CIA involved now? That one another intelligence aspect
of all this that we used to all
acknowledge at least somewhat was the deep state.
You know, like, even though, again, it's this
broad idea that we all generally have different
opinions on. But, generally, whether it's the truth
or not, that used to be something we
today. It's okay. It's unity. Now they're on
our side. It all works out. Well, here's
one of them.
Oh,
I knew I did that. Hold on.
There it does. While I grab it, I'll
tell you. I just I accidentally When I
download these, I download them with a number
if I keep an order. And sometimes, I
just do the same number twice and I
lose one, so I did right here.
So give me a second. Let me grab
this. This this is a good clip too.
Bro.
There we go.
Alright. Here it is.
Those of CBS this morning wanted to know
what tech tycoon Larry Ellison thought of privacy
in the age of the Internet.
Ellison is CEO of Oracle Corporation, which makes
a lot of the hardware that makes the
Internet work. His personal net worth is $43,000,000,000
which Forbes Magazine says makes Ellison the 3rd
richest American.
Charlie spoke with him in his home in
California.
Where do you come down on what NSA
is doing?
Well,
great thing is we live in a democracy.
If we don't like what NSA is doing,
we always we can just get rid of
the government and put in a different government.
Don't you love it? Like, so this is
what's so crazy about that statement.
Technically, he's right. If you believe the constitution
isn't it was respected by the people in
power or that they would ever abide by
it anyway. But what's funny to me about
it is that's the kind of thing you're
getting from these fake libertarian, fake freedom lover
tech elitists.
They're just trying to they it's it's like
they're just they're they're laughing at you.
Whether it's real or not, the point that
my or, like, in this case, I argue
accurate. The point is he's saying it because
he knows you'll like it. He doesn't think
that. You think he actually like, these people
are the actual ruling structure in the sense
of the technocracy as I I see it
today.
But he's just saying that because he's wanting
people to think that he oh, good. Yeah.
What's, the point is if we today all
stood up and every single American said, we
wanna remove all of you from power and
put somebody new in place,
they're just gonna go, okay.
We respect your sovereignty.
Yeah. Right. Like, we actually anybody actually believes
that makes sense. Even though technically it is
in the constitution
that we have the right to alter or
abolish it, should we argue that they're they're
not fulfilling what they claim their job is.
But here we are.
Not gonna happen because they're now building out
a structure that makes that null and void.
But that's why he says things like that
or why Thiel or Elon Musk or Zuckerberg
pretend to be libertarians.
I think,
actually,
we've been collecting this information for so long,
and and long before NSA was collecting it.
Let me tell you who was collecting it.
Think about that. American Express.
We already know this.
Bank of Visa.
Likely for those same groups, by the way,
but nonetheless All of your all of your
credit card data.
We have all of your all of your
financial records.
This whole issue of privacy is utterly fascinating
to me.
Who's ever heard of
this information being misused
by the government?
In what way? Well, I just hear you
clearly. You're saying
whatever the NSA is doing is okay with
me. It's great. I wish Yeah. It's great.
It's essential.
By the way, president Obama thinks it's essential.
Wow.
Alright. The illegal action that they lied about
and denied until it was proven, and they
still lied about it is essential.
Right? That's what he's telling you guys. This
is the guy that's about to roll out
with others with an Israeli bank aspect and
other complete deep state elements, a control structure
for artificial intelligence with $500,000,000,000
of your money.
This is what he thinks. Realize the the
data control that comes along with what they're
doing.
This is terrifying, and it gets worse. It's
essential. Look at the next clip. If we
want, if we wanna minimize the kind of
strikes that we just had in Boston,
it's absolutely essential.
But but what point would it be alarming
for you in terms of government surveillance?
At what point would your red line be
crossed?
If the government
used it
to do political targeting if the demark Too
late. It had already happened before he said
that. On top of that, what he said
a second ago is when did everybody ever
heard of the government abusing? Are you serious?
If you don't see by now this guy
is either that I mean, you can't be
he can't be in his position and not
be aware of what we're talking about. That's
what I believe. So I'm a I am
convinced this guy is absolutely trying to walk
down. That's why he started the way he
did, guys.
And now here he is.
Why the government would never abuse his power?
That's basically what he said.
And then that it's essential that they do
do this being that you that's that's scary.
Pratt's used it to go after review in
terms of government surveillance.
At what point would your red line be
crossed,
if the government used it
to do political targeting, if the Democrats
used it to go after Republicans,
if the Republicans used it to go after
Democrats. In other words, if it became a
we stopped looking for terrorists
It's already happening. And we started looking for
people with,
on the other side of the aisle. I
mean, even how about the FISA warrant discussion?
I mean, there's a lot of examples of
this kind of stuff. Right? Abusing those positions
to go after or, you know, any number
of things or assassinations around the world. These
have happened.
This guy is a is a is alarming,
guys. He's laying out a very clumsy I
mean, well, this is not immediate. This is
older.
But look at what's happening today with what
he's saying and this and I was gonna
get to this in a second, but I
might as well play it now because it
seems more relevant.
The converse another clip you probably already seen.
Right? So here he was telling you it's
essential to basically take your data without you
knowing about it, to keep you safe, of
course.
But also maybe because you'll
behave better
as long as you think you're being watched.
Welcome to the technocratic panopticon.
Schools, we think we can absolutely lock down
schools.
So that
dramatically reduce the case of anyone being on
campus that doesn't belong on campus.
And immediately alert the second someone pulls out
a gun, immediately alert. Recognize use AI cameras.
He's talking about Oracle and the surveillance. Immediately
recognize that. But a, we keep everyone off
campus that doesn't belong on campus.
The police, another another thing.
And remember what Whitney said earlier. Right? That
they always use what you're most afraid of
in the moment. So when he said this,
it's because, oh, the school shootings, that's big.
And the well, we can stop that. Right?
It's and maybe they can, but that's not
the point. It's about how they're using what
you want to hear to get this control
structure in place, and now it's literally rolling
out. Body cameras. We've re completely redesigned body
cameras.
Our our body cameras cost $70.
Normal body camera costs,
I don't know, $7,000.
Our body cameras are simply
lenses.
22 lenses attached to your vest, attached to
the smartphone that you're wearing.
And we actually
take the video that the police officer
is
by the way and and the camera is
always on. You don't turn it on and
off.
And by the way, the way you turn
it on and on, you can't turn it
off. You go into the bathroom. Oracle,
I I need I need I need 2
minutes to take a bathroom break, and we'll
turn it off. Oh my god.
The truth is we don't really turn it
off.
What we do is we record it
so no one can see it,
but no one can get into that recording
without a court order. We record it so
no one can see it?
I mean, that that's a special kinda stupid
right there, guys. That's crazy.
Why record it then?
But we'll see. That's the whole point right
there. Is because should they have a court
order, well, we'll comply.
Alright. So there you go. It's it's all
interconnected. But realize what he's talking about is
just just doesn't just relate to body cams.
We'll gonna get into in a second the
very things you've already seen, the things we
pointed out many times. The World Economic Forum,
the idea of the internal biosurveillance, the aspect
of, you know, the idea of what he's
overlapping here, but in an internal way. Using
artificial intelligence, and this is always what it's
about. And guys, what at the time he's
giving the speech, that's they've already been doing
this.
That's why I think it's really disingenuous when
you get these kind of conversations or, you
know, holding up a big clunky microchip and
saying, this is the future when they damn
well know what they're actually working on.
So you get the privacy you requested,
but
Requested. Court order. If you get a court
order, we will, you know, judge, you know,
can order. I I wanna look at that.
This is a bathroom break.
If there's something something comes up,
and plus, I'm I'm going to lunch with
my friends. Oracle, I need an hour for
privacy with lunch with my friends. God bless.
Oh my god. Listen in unless there's a
court order. But it's interesting. And but we
transmit the video
back to headquarters.
So headquarters and and AI is constantly monitoring
the video. Remember this terrible case in Memphis
where the 5 police officers
basically beat to death another another citizen in
Memphis?
Well, that can't happen because
it would be on TV at at it'd
be t on TV at at headquarters.
Everyone would see it. Your your your body
cams will be trans As well as literally
everything else all the time. But, yeah, but
we'll stop the bad cops, So ignore all
that. Admitting that.
The police And then probably not even stop
them because they don't care. Be on their
best behavior
because we record we're we're constantly recording, watching,
and recording everything that's going on. Citizens will
be on their best behavior
because we're constantly recording and reporting everything that's
going on. That is a panopticon, guys. That's
literally the idea behind a panopticon.
Well, really just but really the idea being
that you may or may not be being
watched. But if you're under the impression that
you're always being watched, whether or not it's
actually happening in that moment, you act accordingly
because you believe you are. I mean, that's
essentially the total information awareness point. That's essentially
why I think the NSA example the information
was eventually admitted to. They want you to
know you're being watched, but in a way
that they can kinda walk it back if
they have to.
That's what this is. This is rolling out
in front of you. I just we we've
been warning and warning and warning about what
this is gonna be. And we still have
time to push back.
But, damn it, if we don't have people
that are wildly influential trying to tell us
we're blackpilled, or we're lying, or misrepresenting something
because freedom.
And it's
it's unimpeachable.
The the cars
the cars have camera, you know, cam cameras
on them. Alright. We we have I think
we have a squad car here someplace.
But those kind of applications using
AI if we can use AI and we're
using AI to monitor the video. So if
that altercation had occurred that occurred in Memphis,
the chief of police would be immediately notified.
It's not people that are looking at those
cameras. It's AI that's looking at the camera.
No. No. No. You can't do this. It'd
be like a shooting. That's gonna be immediately
that's gonna be an an event that's immediately
rip an alarm is gonna go off. It's
gonna be and, we're gonna we're gonna
have supervision. I know every police officer is
gonna be supervised
at all times.
And the and the supervision will, and and
if there's a problem, AI will report the
problem and report it to the appropriate for,
person, whether it's the sheriff or the chief
or whom whomever. Now it's easy to use
examples like a shooting that everyone seems to
be on the same side about. But what
happens when it becomes more nuanced?
What happens if and you know they exist.
It suddenly becomes a conversation that's right down
the middle. So who decides?
They
do.
We need to,
take control of the situation. It's a lot
of power. Same thing with We have drones.
We just If there's something going on in
a shopping site, and I'll stop. Yeah. A
drone goes out there, I get there way
faster than a police car.
There's no reason for, by the way, high
speed chases. You shouldn't have high speed chases
between cars.
You just have a drone follow the car.
I mean, it's very very simple. And the
new generation generation of autonomous drones. Mhmm.
Spotting forest fires.
A heap of a drone. Drone spots a
forest fire. And the Yeah. It's just only
a few, like, 30 seconds left. That's the
general point. Right? That you know you're I
I wanted to give you the full clip
because mostly you're good. There's, like, a one
minute clip of this going around. Because Because
it's just very important to hear what he's
talking about and how that really comes together.
So talking about the overlap here, I think
it's important to see this too.
Where this is Elon Musk.
Hold on.
And his xai program.
Said to correct that real quick. So if
you don't see this already, it's important to
recognize that the quiet transition from DARPA's XAI
to Elon's XAI is is right in front
of you. I just don't know. It's so
trend. It's it's important to see how this
all is, you know, DARPA
and then, you know, like, well, TIA into
Palantir, like, the same kind of dynamic, guys.
And I think what we're seeing is a
a playing out of that in a in
a compartmentalized
way.
So I'll include this for you to check
out so you realize how important that is.
But here's just the quick overlap of a
few of many different ways between what Elon
Musk is telling you is the end of
the world open AI deceiver,
even though he's working with them in many
ways.
And and
Elon Musk and his companies in general. So
this is just an article about the DARPA
challenge for this critical software AI.
And it says, AI XCC brings together, that's
the name for the group, the
what DARPA is doing. So DARPA brings together
leading AI companies. And this is sorry. This
is,
where was it? 2023 August.
It brings together leading AI companies that will
work with DARPA to make their cutting edge
technology and expertise available to challenge competitors.
Anthropic,
Google, Microsoft,
and OpenAI will collaborate with DARPA
for the where was it?
Hold on. Damn it. Did I
there's multiple examples, but I think I didn't
grab the
anyway, just look either way. First point anyway,
because we're gonna get to a bunch of
these examples that overlap both of them.
DARPA and OpenAI is the point here. There's
there's another paragraph that I was thought I
highlighted, but I don't wanna try to find
it right now. So the only point I'm
making with this article is that OpenAI
is overlap with DARPA.
And more than one way, by the way,
and there's a lot of evidence around this,
especially on Twitter, you can look this stuff
up. There's a lot of conversation. My point
is it's interesting how hard it is to
find these things online
because I think we're in a controlled system
today very clearly.
But DARPA, as we were just showing you,
that's the point, is overlap with Elon Musk
in a lot of ways. This one I
just think is most important
and OpenAI.
Then if the business have to be everything,
but I think it's important to recognize these
two things are connected to what I think
is a central role in all this. Then
you can see
Palantir
and Andro, which we just talked about, joined
forces with tech groups to bid for Pentagon
contract. We just referenced that earlier. That's this
consortium that put together, which as far as
I could tell, is still going forward. That
consortium just so happens to include the same
2 groups. Palantir and Andrille, 2 of the
largest US defense technology companies, so war, merchants
of death, are in talks with about a
dozen competitors to form a consortium that will
jointly bid for US government work or in
otherwise,
an idea that they're all just becoming one
blob for artificial intelligence contracts.
And it's saying the consortium is plan is
planning to announce as early as this month,
hasn't happened yet. And they have they they've
reached agreements with a number of tech groups,
including
Elon Musk, SpaceX,
and Chat GPT maker OpenAI. So as always,
my point is that if Elon at this
and this is at the time. He's been
saying this so far, well before this came
out.
If they're tell if he's saying OpenAI is
the problem, well, why would you then work
with a group that's working with OpenAI? Or
have overlaps with them in other ways as
well, which I'll show you in a second.
It my point I'm making is that I
think this is more of a facade.
Now Palantir
oh, which one was this? The
oh, right. So it says, as of January
23, 2025, today, the talks between Palantir and
Andruil with SpaceX and OpenAI,
the consortium,
are still currently underway.
So right now with him talking about all
this, like, just if your belief is OpenAI
is gonna end the world or could, like,
why would you work alongside them? Doesn't have
to maybe there's a reason. You can consider
for yourself. I think these stand out.
Now on Grok, I asked this question.
Show me all the ways Elon Musk opens
with o works with OpenAI. Just to see
what they have to say. Guess what? There's
a lot of inter lot of interesting things
here. Elon Musk was 1 and you guys
know most of this. Elon Musk was one
of the cofounders of OpenAI, which that's he's
clear about, but I still argue a lot
of people don't even know that, alongside Sam
Altman.
He was instrumental in the initial setup providing
significant seed funding. So, basically, it says Elon
Musk put put up a $1,000,000,000
for OpenAI.
And, yeah, this is all public information. My
point is simply that it's interesting to think
about where it's all going
and knowing that Elon Musk so usual as
usual, if you pull aside the narrative, which
doesn't maybe that's more important or maybe it's
a lie.
Right? So we don't know. So you pull
aside the narrative and look at the facts.
I find it interesting that Elon Musk put
a $1,000,000,000 toward this company, was a part
of this company. And now this company is
rolling out through Trump's administration, which does seem
interesting and odd seeing as how Elon Musk
is in the administration and he's working with
XAI.
So why they go this way? Well, maybe
because there's more connection than we want they
want people to see. So they're playing out
this Elon Musk doesn't agree.
I just don't feel like that makes sense.
But you can decide for yourself.
And it says,
Musk has been credited for coming up with
the name OpenAI and recruiting
key talent.
But as usual in the past, we've already
got examples of him making claims like making
the name, and that turns out to be
a lie. So who knows? Maybe that's a
lie too. Board of directors, Musk served on
OpenAI board of directors until he resigned in
2018. His departure was reportedly due to a
potential conflict of interest with Tesla AI Development
and because he wanted more control over OpenAI.
Now the argument is he wanted to do
it in a way that helped the people
and wasn't about the ending of the war.
I don't think any other examples in his
life other than narrative make that make sense.
They love to give him this fake persona,
but I think I'll play this clip again
in a second. It doesn't add up with
who I think he really is, but that's
for you to decide. So my point is
what you have in the facts is that
he wanted control, he funded the money, he
was part of the company, and then he
got
they backed away from it.
That's what we know. The rest is narrative.
Now it says,
more recently, Musk has engaged with OpenAI through
legal means. He filed a lawsuit against them
and Sam Altman in March of this of
last year, accusing them of abandoning the company's
founding mission of developing AI for the benefit
of humanity.
I mean, how do you even say how
do you like, how would you legally prove
that you're doing this with the interest of
not benefiting humanity? Like, what's prove what's a
provable metric of whether you benefit humanity? It's
subjective is my point. Courts of law don't
usually engage with subjective rule. So to me,
it seems like a 2 an knowing it
won't it's about putting forward the statement.
You're not helping humanity.
This is my opinion, but look at what's
been going on.
Doesn't that feel a bit contrived?
Like, a lot of stuff happening now? And
is this particularly after OpenAI's partnership with Microsoft?
Microsoft, who's also currently a part of the
new rollout with Trump, who Elon Musk is
a part of. It doesn't make sense. That
lawsuit was later withdrawn
in June
only to be refiled in August.
How did well, maybe there was a discrepancy
or maybe he just was wanting to keep
it going and then, you know, it doesn't
seem to make add up to me. Musk's
legal actions also involve allegations of antitrust violations
due to overlapping board memberships between OpenAI, Microsoft,
and other entities. Then it says public criticism.
After leaving, Musk has criticized the direction of
the company, especially its transition from nonprofit to
profit model.
A capped for profit model.
That's interesting. I'll show you why. He's also
found he also founded his own AI company,
which I argue is just DARPA's x AI
program. It's very obvious. It ended months after
they or started months after they ended theirs
in DARPA. It's silly. And it stands for
explainable AI. And Grok is literally there saying,
explain this post right there. It's it's silly.
Now it says, which can be seen as
a direct competitor
to OpenAI?
That's the narrative.
Musk's public statements and actions suggest a competitive
stance,
particularly after he left the company.
Then it says, OpenAI has responded to Musk's
legal out actions by releasing emails and documents,
which you can look up for yourself, showing
Musk's earlier support
for, in fact, turning OpenAI into a for
profit company and his attempts to merge OpenAI
with Tesla or gain more control over the
organization.
Look at that.
So it starts to look like he if
there's any honesty to this deviation between the
two, that he got kinda pushed away because
he wanted the model late. You can decide
for yourself. But it's interesting how often the
story doesn't add up with what Musk's you
know, the ideologue
swear is the case.
It says this indicates a complex history where
Musk was once deeply involved in speech you
know, you get it. Interesting.
Now under the post from OpenAI
announcing the Stargate project, Elon Musk says they
don't actually have the money.
Okay?
So didn't Donald Trump just literally say that
they that so how do you make sense
of that?
And then here
is I I honestly think this is a
theater.
That's just my opinion. Here is what this
clip says where he's talking about OpenAI with,
Tucker.
Turn to Sam Altman about annihilation, do you
think? I think, in reality, he's not concerned
about it. About annihilation
is what he's talking about. So that's again,
that's so you're talking about a group that
you're okay with the world being annihilated,
but we'll work with them here and there
because, you know,
that doesn't make sense to me. I don't
trust OpenAI. I saw that company as a
non profit open source. The Open and OpenAI,
I named the company. Yeah. OpenAI as an
open source, and it is now extremely closed
source and maximizing profit. I don't Yeah. Okay.
Just you just you just heard from Grok,
which is his program.
There's emails and information already proving that he
wanted to go that direction, and they that
didn't so so there you go. He's presenting
the idea that he was the one fighting
for the altruistic direction even though that's simply
not true, at least at the beginning point.
Kinda hard to keep missing these guys.
Greg Reese put on a great clip breaking
a lot of this stuff down. He's lying.
So too do a lot of these fake
personas in the public eye. Understand how you
actually go from being an open source nonprofit
to
a closed source for maximum profit organization. Well,
but Sam often got rich, didn't he? At
various points, he's claimed not to to to
be getting rich, but he's claimed many things
that were false. Yeah. So have you. And
now, apparently, he's gonna get $10,000,000,000 of stock
or something like that. I don't trust Sam
Altman. I I don't think we wanna have
the most powerful AI in the world controlled
by someone who is not trustworthy. That seems
like a Ah, so we want you to
do it.
How much you wanna bet that happens? Fair
concern. Yeah. But you don't think as someone
who knows him and has dealt with him
that he is worried about the possibility this
could Oh, gross. He's not wearing socks. I
hate when people do that.
How in the world do you wear shoes
without socks? Anyway, this it's that that was
Tucker, by the way. But so this
is important, I think. It's just simply dishonest,
I think.
Now, here's Greg Reese in the clip that
I showed you. And then we played this
before. Now, you know what? We're going long
today. I'm gonna play it. This we don't
have that much more to get to. I
just think it's important to see this on
the back of what he's saying, guys. There's
a lot of dishonesty here. And then Gregory
is formally of Infowars
that broke off because like a lot of
other people did because that platform is not
honest. That's I mean, this is an objective
reality as far as I can tell, how
often we're seeing deliberately misinforming,
like, statements from the drone conversation or from
the inauguration or from January 6th or whatever
else we're talking about. Right now, completely showing
for Elon Musk and Trump despite trying to
pretend otherwise.
This is why it's important, guys. This is
why people are leaving that.
Pop culture has touted Elon Musk as some
sort of eccentric heavyweight genius
with humble beginnings,
but this is demonstrably false.
Elon Musk was born in South Africa, where
he claims he grew up extremely poor,
but his family owned an emerald mine. As
a teenager,
Elon would trade emeralds for cash in New
York City, and his father bragged how they
had so much money we couldn't even close
our safe.
Musk claims to have had about a $100,000
of student loan debt,
but he received a full scholarship to the
University of Pennsylvania,
where he bought a 10 bedroom frat house
with his friend Adeo Ressi and ran an
illegal nightclub.
The pop culture claim is that Elon has
an IQ of a 155,
but this has never been tested. And after
being accepted into Stanford for PhD studies, he
dropped out after 2 days.
After dropping out, Elon began his first business
venture with his brother Kimbal,
Zip 2, which was essentially a digital version
of the yellow pages.
The brothers received tens of 1,000 of dollars
from their parents, and yet Elon denies this.
An associate of Elon's father, Greg Curry, got
involved to bring in investors.
But Elon's code was no good, so they
had to hire on professional coders to rewrite
everything.
Zip 2 was then sold for $307,000,000
to Compaq, who later shut it down without
ever earning a profit.
Elon made $22,000,000,
bought a $1,000,000 McLaren f one supercar, which
made mainstream news before he totaled the uninsured
vehicle.
Musk then went on to create an online
bank, x.com.
He partnered with banking expert, Harris Fricker, Edward
Ho, and Christopher Paine.
All three ended up leaving the company after
accusing Elon of lying to the media about
the quality of their product.
Elon claims he founded PayPal.
Before the company was named PayPal, it was
known as Confinity.
It was founded in 1998 by Peter Thiel
and Max Levchin.
After losing 1,000,000 of dollars,
Elon's x.com
was bought by Confinity in a merger in
2,000.
All Musk contributed at Confinity
was his own power struggle. He made himself
CEO and pushed to change the name to
x dotcom.
The executive team successfully petitioned to fire Musk
while he was away on vacation.
Part of Musk's resignation agreement stipulated
that all references to founders of the company
will be removed from their website, allowing Elon
to claim credit, which so far is all
he has ever achieved.
Peter Thiel then rebranded the company as PayPal,
went public, and sold to eBay for $1,500,000,000
Elon made 180,000,000
from the deal, which he then invested into
Tesla,
SpaceX, and failed company SolarCity.
Elon falsely claims to be the founder of
Tesla.
Tesla was founded in 2003 by Marc Tarpenning
and Martin Eberhard, who developed the Tesla Roadster.
When Tesla Motors began looking for venture capital,
they approached Elon Musk, who had the fake
credibility as PayPal's cofounder.
Musk joined with the condition that he be
named chairman of the board. In emails, Musk
was upset that the media was not giving
him credit for Tesla Motors and went after
Martin Eberhard
replacing him as CEO.
He then forced Eberhard out of the company
and rewrote the company's history to have himself
listed as an original cofounder.
Martin Eberhard, the man behind the Tesla Roadster,
was promised the 1st Roadster off the assembly
line, but Musk screwed him over on that
as well and sent that car into space.
You can tell it's real because it looks
so fake, honestly.
So who is Elon Musk?
Elon describes his father as being an evil,
abusive man.
His father, Errol Musk, has been accused of
being a pedophile
and fathered a child with his stepdaughter,
who is 42 years younger than him.
This spoiled, narcissistic failure,
son of accused pedophile,
wants to put computer chips in everyone's brain
so that we can merge with artificial intelligence.
His girlfriend is now bragging how this could
all lead to a communist utopia.
And strangely enough, former Nazi and head of
NASA, Wernher von Braun,
predicted a man named Elon would conquer Mars
in a 1952
novel that he wrote, which is odd because
NASA has partnered with Elon's SpaceX to work
towards colonizing Mars.
Elon Musk, like everything else in today's modern
society,
is a fraud, a fake genius,
just like fake philanthropist Bill Gates and his
fake vaccines,
brought to you by the fake news.
Here's a pro tip for dealing with the
mainstream media in all of pop culture.
Assume it's a lie and research everything.
You can tell it's real because it looks
so fake, honestly.
I'm glad he said that. Of course, the
point is assume it's fake, but do your
research. Right? So basically question everything while considering
all possibilities.
Exactly the same point.
It's important, guys. I mean, as he says
right there, Elon Musk has always been a
fraud and has all the appearances of an
MK Ultra puppet. You can decide for yourself.
In fact, the point is I'm the the
dishonesty.
Now, this I'm gonna generally I think just
for time in general, go over skip this
for the most part, but you can read
this back and forth. It's not that long.
The bottom line is I think this is
more theater. Microsoft and OpenAI feud with Elon
Musk over $500,000,000,000
star Stargate project.
They're saying they'll star SoftBank as well under
10,000,000,000 secured. I have that on good authority.
Gee, I wonder how. I wonder who's I
wonder who he's talking to about stuff.
What connections does he have to? I don't
know. Israel. It says, wrong. As you sure
know surely know, Sam Alton responds. Want to
come visit the first site already underway?
Like, you he must be able to know
this one way or the other if the
car it's Donald Trump's plan, guys.
So it just seems wild to me that
they're even pretending like this is back and
forth or the same kind of thing. On
24 hours of Musk and Sam Altman's public
exchanges.
I just think we're being played just like
he's laying out right there.
Now, another thing I'll include, Sam James Lee
did a a kind of a breakdown. It's
interesting on top of the the so well,
first, in general, Derek wrote an article about
this. You probably already heard. The mud the
the the guy from OpenAI
who died.
The mother of OpenAI whistleblower, he was whist
he was basically speaking out about the company,
accuses the law law enforcement, OpenAI, of delaying
justice for her son. And very clearly seem
to think that there's foul play here. That
what he was gonna expose about OpenAI and
this is Sam Altman, OpenAI
was more than just
copyright or prop this was about something deeper.
Now that's you can read for yourself. It's
not definitive.
But it's interesting with what's happening right now.
Right? And this guy, died in a mysterious
circumstances.
Derek went over this really well, very objectively.
Signs of a struggle debunked the suicide claim.
Right? This is the family speaking out. It
says also the angle of the bullet was
not it's not suicidal at all. That's according
to their investigator. It was a downward angle
at the middle of the forehead.
Here we go. This this is scary web
2.0
or whatever. 10 point however many there's been
between them.
That's crazy. And yet, still ruled a suicide?
You realize how difficult that would be to
downward angle at the middle of your forehead,
guys? That's not that doesn't happen. Ask police
officers. Ask detectives, rather.
A
lot I mean, the point is, guys, read
it for yourself. It's something is off about
all of this, more than just what we're
talking about there, you know, the Technocracy panopticon.
But also, James Lee includes, apparently, Annie Altman,
his sister,
as accusing him of sexually abusing her in
very serious ways for an ongoing period.
At the apparently, all the family denies it.
So that's you could read more if you
want. I think that's interesting to include in
what's going on.
Now, and on the way, by the way,
or by the way, on top of that,
like, think about the conversation of, like, I
don't know Biden's
daughter and her diary.
Right? Everyone, you know, who knows? She could
be lying, of course, or maybe she's calling
out something important. I it's obviously something that
connects or, you know,
resonates with what we seem to know of
Biden. Right? But nonetheless,
it's one of those things that gets it
is the case because that's what we wanna
think. And in this case, she must be
lying because it's not what we wanna think.
See how that works? Same point.
It's just a simple choice of partisanship is
all it comes down to. Now, in the
art the point of the mRNA vaccine, I
I just really can't even believe there's any
conservative or team sport Republican that has the
gall to pretend like this is not a
crazy,
crazy deviation. Well, really, the truth is it's
not because he's always promoted it, which is
the whole point. But they've always pretended that
wasn't really happening, and that's why it's important
now. So here's what he had to say.
CEO, Oracle,
Oracle CEO, Larry Ellison, the White House. Now
you just heard it, but in case just
it's only 40 seconds.
Or is it the,
yeah, 40 seconds.
We
gene sequence. Once we gene sequence that cancer
tumor,
you can then vaccinate the person,
design a vaccine for every individual person to
vaccinate them against that cancer.
And you can make that vaccine, the that
mRNA vaccine,
you can make that robotically, again, using AI
in about 48 hours. So imagine early cancer
detection,
the development of a cancer vaccine for the
for your particular cancer aimed at you, and
have have that vaccine available in 48 hours.
This is the promise of AI and the
promise of the future.
There we are.
Dang it. I was trying to find I
think I might have opened them already. But
so here here is an interesting point.
And this really does feel make sure it
wasn't this one.
No, we'll come back to these. That was
the articles I went earlier. I swear there
was another one here called
Let's see. Let me just look look it
up real quick and I'll come back to
it.
So here is what Patrick Hennings had to
say. Well, actually, Michael Preege here first saying
and this is interesting because it does feel
this way, which should be a huge jarring
red flag for peep for people on the
right. It says this AI designed individualized mRNA
vaccine scheme is fascinating.
It's as if there was a script,
and everyone was supposed to have been enamored
with mRNA
after COVID and thus excited and enthusiastic to
embrace this next step.
But, of course, that's not what happened.
And they just kept going with the same
script anyway. You know what it all reminds
me of? Azov movement, Ukraine. Right? They just
I mean, they did they did shift away
from acknowledging it, but the point is they
just kept jamming through the narrative despite how
clumsy it was. And I agree with him.
This does feel interesting.
And and Patrick says act exactly. The supposed
mRNA technology is a fraud. It was never
operationalized. It's the equivalent of vapor war in
technology terms. And no. It was never shown
to actually do what they claimed it would
with fake COVID vaccine. Despite all of the
hype from controlled opposition profiteers like Malone, last
latest attempt.
So it's interesting. I mean, obviously,
this should be a very this just they
roll it out like we know it works,
guys. And that's what we've been screaming about.
Now, I wrote about this or covered this
many times.
This one was simply saying this a study
found, a peer reviewed study in a very
highly regarded journal that the actual platform itself,
on top of everything else, the spike protein
and the MRI, all of it has their
own issues.
Quite frankly, this thing is a weapon. I
mean, it is whether you think it was
designed that way or not, it's I think
you know how
unlikely it would be for you to design
this and accidentally make every single thing as
deadly as possible? That seems crazy ridiculous.
Study finds mRNA platform itself was driving myocarditis.
And don't forget, I mean, I'll include those
too since I'm bringing it up. I was
just talking about this somebody else.
Oops, I didn't mean to go to that
page, that was the Hold on.
This one and the other one, I'll include
both.
Can't type. There we go.
So the first one,
and you we've talked about this or actually
technically this one's the first one. Ralph Barrick.
Right?
The US funded in right down here in
his own academic curriculum, you can see
openly funding
research on rabbits to make self
basically, coronavirus induced myocarditis. That's what it was.
Crazy that we can't connect those dots. And
it says, US funded research on, quote, coronavirus
induced myocarditis.
Now, again,
the conversation of whether you think viruses exist
or not are it's an important one. But
realize that that doesn't have to define this
conversation.
We could be talking about bacteria or if
you think that isn't included, we could talk
about virus sized transistors that Robert that that
Charles Lieber was working on at Harvard in
2011. I mean, literally, these things are out
there. Or that all of it was a
big ruse too. That's certainly possible. My point,
though, was that it was being publicly stated.
Coronavirus
induced myocarditis.
And then
I went on to cover even more. They
turned out there's more documents about them trying
to turn that into an aerosolized aspect of
it. And then this
oh, and I guess I'll grab all these
since I'm bringing it all up again.
But so it says, did US government work
on a myocarditis inducing virus? Then work to
aerosolize it. The facts argue at least what
they presented as the facts is yes.
And we can't have that honest conversation about
that. Or
dual use. New aerosolized mRNA delivering nanoparticles can
vaccinate or they can eliminate. That was a
and what was this? British Medical Journal or
Nature? I forget. A main article. We covered
it then. And they weren't saying they could
use it to kill you, but they stated
that it could be used to raise your
insulin levels or drop it to 0, which
by the way could kill you. And then
my point is they could do this to
affect whatever they wanted to effectively vaccinate you
or to effectively eliminate you. And that is
what dual use technology is. This was 2023.
What they're talking about with Ralph Baer goes
back to the nineties. So realize that all
this is the connection of the research or
at least the stated research that goes right
through COVID 19.
And then there was another one. This one
right here.
MRNA platform is dangerous dual use tech dual
use technology.
And then we talked about cell spreading mRNA
and altering evolution with nanotechnology, which they promised
to do
right through the COVID 19 time frame. About
20 years before, 2002, they said we will
alter evolution with nanotechnology,
a US government document. And here we are.
Let me include those really quickly so you
guys have those for the show notes.
So all of this obviously matters. Right? The
idea of this research and where it goes.
And so here we are where they're developing
or driving forward
more mRNA
platform designed
drugs.
And on top of that, what that really
means is not only is the platform and
everything else involved with it going is a
dangerous thing,
but that ultimately, they're now making
treatments for something that the thing they gave
you caused, which is what we all should
be talking about in this concept, which many
most people are. As Toby Rogers says, AI
is irrelevant to this process.
Now whether you think that or not, it's
interesting to consider the different opinions. He says,
if you want to genetically sequence a tumor,
do that.
If you want to develop an injectable mRNA
product based on that sequence, do that. You
don't need AI for either of these processes.
So what the hell is he talking about?
Well, if you agree with that, which I
think is a fair point, it's because AI
is the direction, it's the plan. So they're
just using this to justify the other, which
is like Neuralink, and they're unable to walk
again even though it's about something much darker.
Kate,
Katheros and Fitz simply says he's pitching a
line, Ellison, to justify trillion taxpayer money to
private companies to make more billions.
It would be hard to just say we're
going to rob more money since there's already
21,000,000,000,000
missing, or even harder to say you want
we want you to pay us trillions to
chip you.
Hashtag mRNA grifters.
It's a lot of clear step evidence out
there. They're that what I'm showing you, but
also people that, you know, have been studying
this, have been highlighting this, have been warning
about it. They see it. Now I said,
it's great to see everyone discussing mRNA shots
causing cancer
in light of the new Trump administration pushing
for mRNA cancer shots.
TLav, on that note, has been on this
topic since 2022, ended before, quite frankly. But
here is the ones that I brought up.
2022, peer reviewed study finds mRNA jabs suppress
immune system and increase risks to cancer, other
diseases. So I just wanna highlight as usual,
demonstrate our value of how far ahead we
are on some of these topics as it
was not unique to us. Plenty of other
independent media, honest, nonpartisan,
independent media were highlighting this early.
Or this one from 2023.
New modified RNA, mod RNA cancer jab will
also destroy your immune system.
This is the one they're rolling out, guys,
or one variation thereof. It's the same discussion.
We've been following this progression. This one 2024.
PRP science finds mod r a injections, Pfizer
and Moderna, cause cancer.
Much worse. More than one study has found
that. So here we are where they're rolling
it out, and here's the Swiss policy research
breaking this down in very, very clear. It's
undeniable.
And now they're gonna be giving you something
to solve the problem they created? That's how
this tends to work. Ask big pharma.
Now Mary Talley Bowden MD points out, and
notice how all the MAGA media influencers are
staying quiet
on AI driven mRNA vaccines.
Call them out. Now I I talk when
I say that, I'm talking about the
the ones you might expect. Right? The people
that are the central team sport players that
are out there screaming about the narrative but
constantly being dishonest. I think there's a lot
of conservatives that are calling this out.
Jakey Leakes points out, please understand
why you can't vaccinate against cancer.
Cancer produces antigens in buckets. The immune system
doesn't respond because it thinks the cells are
yours.
Producing more cancer antigens just tires your immune
system, which, what do you know, seems to
be a focal point of everything they do.
It's more complicated than an Oracle database.
Mary tally tally also points out, you can't
vaccinate cancer. You vaccinate to avoid liability.
That's where we are, guys. We were being
manipulated in dangerous ways that are hurting people.
But overall, the point is that clearly,
everything they do seems to lead to the
the
what makes you more sick for the outcome.
Truthstream Media says, does anyone know how they
plan to safely test personalized mRNA vaccines? It's
a very good question. I gave my shot
at guessing at the you know, in a
slightly
you know, trying to be facetious, but I
I really do think this is where it
goes. They'll likely feign some testing process that'll,
of course, necessitate DNA, biometrics, your firstborn child,
and, of course, a digital ID to access
the special app designed with it. I'd also
like to I'd also think if they care
to test it at all, big if, they
likely already did it in 2020 without our
knowledge.
So same point. But, you know, the point
being that these things tend to end up
that way. Where, know, now it's not visual
ID. You just need to have this for
to get the app done to to be
able to access the information that'll help your
life. You know, that's how this works.
Edward Dowd,
of all people, says sounds and this is
interesting because you're seeing a lot of these
people that are pretty strong Trump supporters Or
at the very least, you know, whatever you
think it's interesting to see people I I
shouldn't even say it like that. It shows
integrity to me. Somebody who is willing it
it's a line. Now whether I think the
line should have been drawn earlier. That's my
opinion. This is somebody standing up and saying,
sounds this is Mario Noffel, by the way,
mister, you know, Elon Musk. Basically,
the mainstream alter the mainstream alternative media, mainstream
media version.
Just dumping out the narrative, and it's just
very it's and pretending to be all independent
media. He says, from cancer detection to custom
vaccine in 48 hours. You know, really just
praising this whole thing like it's a positive
thing.
Edward Doud says, sounds super rad, bro, but
count me out. Individualized mRNA vaccines to cure
cancer? What an absolute load of s h
I t.
Good for him.
Doctor Jane Ruby
wants you to wants to make sure you
don't forget that Donald Trump
was on it the whole time.
Ain't on it, she says. The point is,
he has never stopped shilling for this.
So if you ever pretended like he doesn't
mean it, you're just you're making yourself feel
better about the obvious truth in front of
you instead of being honest with yourself.
To get the shot, the vaccinations are so
important.
This is really going around now. They have
to get their shot. Today, we're on the
verge of another shots. American medical miracle. This
is one of the greatest miracles in the
history of modern day
medicine. I Oh, I had to look down
and remember what that word was. I have
modern day, checks notes, medicine.
That's fantastic.
But think about that, guys. He's never stopped
really saying the same thing.
How do you misunderstand this? Is that Moderna
have announced their vaccine is approximately
95%
effective.
These vaccines are all Relative risk reduction, which
ultimately ended up being about 0.08%
difference between 95%.
We went over this so many times.
The lie, whether he knew it or not.
Also very safe. A medical miracle. Lie. Lie.
We have delivered a safe and effective vaccine
in just 9 months. Incorrect. What we've done
is historic.
Don't let them take away. Don't take it
away from ourselves. You're playing that you're playing
right into their hands when you sort of
like, oh, the And that's how easy it
is. Like, when he talks about the biometric
system, well, Clinton couldn't do it. And they
go, well, we'll do it then. Damn the
Democrats. That's how easy it is. And many
fall for it.
Don't let them take it away from you.
Take one away from you that you've been
killing their children with dangerous shots or whether
you know that or not. Like, I know
I do strongly believe he knows it. I
don't know how you could at this point,
especially with his own audience telling him that's
the case, but you can decide.
Actually, if you don't wanna take it, you
shouldn't be forced to take it. No mandates.
But Except the fact that the state of
emergency that he rolled out was what allowed
them to do it. It's all a game
of shell it's a shell game, guys. It
always has been. Take credit because we saved
tens of millions of lives. So is it
funny how they all well, we wanna cheat
here because he said force it, but then
I go, damn it. He just said to
lie again. You know, it's like, just own
it, guys. He's being dishonest. The president and
I are vaxxed, and, did you get the
booster?
Yes. I got it too. Gross. Okay. So,
don't don't don't don't don't don't don't don't
don't. They wanted to say. I said, don't
come tonight. Let's go another time. It's pouring.
Woody Johnson, a great gentleman. Do you ever
hear Johnson and Johnson? He owns the place.
I tell you what. This guy's got cash
like nobody's got cash.
Johnson and John Boo.
You get the point, guys. It goes on
and on and on. I'm just trying to
get through the randomness before
it gets too late. Doctor,
I believe you have doctor. It's that's what
it stands for, right? Alex Zach.
There's somebody who, by the way, I I've,
you know, more and more has just gone
forward.
Like, I really probably we have different opinions
on plenty of things, but I've come to
see that he really does have an intent,
a stance that that I believe is driven
by integrity.
I I and even pushing back on in
in circles around his the conversation that I
think he's discussing because other people take like,
that's what I mean, that's what you have
to do. If you're in a stance, and
especially a contentious one, and you got people
that are pretending to be on your side,
they're saying things that are not, you know,
that deviate from what you then call it
out.
That's what people are afraid to do in
partisanship. So I just wanted to point that
out because recently I reached out to and
said that. I'm like, you know, just don't
respect the stance you're taking on this. It's
important. Right? Because there's a lot of nonsense
and pushback. So he says, in this case,
different conversation though about what we're talking about
today. He says, is anyone surprised that dot
president Trump, the initiator of Operation Warp Speed
and the self proclaimed father of the doc
the COVID shot, who's recently partnered with the
likes of Peter Deal, Elon Musk, and several
other biotech investors and executives is announcing a
$500,000,000,000
in AI infrastructure and the development of an
AI driven mRNA vaccine for cancer.
Like, how is that surprising anybody with what
is just the way that goes forward?
And it says, in my opinion, it's not
surprising at all. I don't think anyone in
government will create lasting positive change for health
and freedom, irrespective of whether or not they're
actually trying to. It's an interesting point, And
I agree with that. I don't think they're
trying to, but I argue the same thing
that that systems designed in a way to
whether or not they want to, it's not
gonna be allowed to happen, which shows you
that we don't live in the system we
think we do. That's what he's talking about.
He says, we are the ones we've been
waiting for. That's why I literally I like
that message. His message is you are the
one that's gonna save you. You have to
empower
yourself. This guy says,
is there a possibility that you don't know
the entire story?
God, I'm getting tired of this. Now, like,
of course, cons we the point is that's
he's saying
a he's considering something. He's not saying, I
know what's going on. The point is this
guy's unwilling to consider the other side of
the fact that maybe you're being played. But
instead, he just goes, are you sure you
don't know that maybe there's a reason it
all makes sense?
Got it. So you're giving him the benefit
of the doubt. He says the first obstacle
to learning is thinking you know everything.
God, what that it's what he's doing is
it's embarrassing that this he's basically talking about
what he's doing and not even realizing it.
He says ignorance is not knowing, but willing
to learn. Stupidity is refusing to learn. Alex
says, this is why I stressed my opinion.
I don't claim to know everything. And he
goes, there are so many possibilities. AI and
mRNA are simply tools no different than a
computer or a gun. Yes.
Technically, you're right.
But didn't they just kill a whole lot
of people? And don't they keep lying about
it still? Are you really not aware of
that? Like, this is what I'm talking about,
guys. This is either
brainwashed delusion or a deliberate misinformer.
That's crazy. And it goes on from there.
It's not worth he's just point this. He's
like
oh, great.
Just moved again.
He said, mRNA could very well fix broken
diseases and caused you. Oh, great. So now
that it might be able to do something
good, we should ignore the dangerous direction it's
going in Or the obvious red flags of
what he just laid out because you're you're
saying maybe there's a thing you don't see?
Wow.
And then but he does say it could
also be a catastrophe. Well, good. Then we
agree that we shouldn't allow you see the
point? But he goes on to say, in
my opinion, anyone who's truly knowledgeable on health
know that knows there's a fundamental emotional component
to cancer that can't be injected away. Anyway,
he's goes on his opinions. The point is
there's one last response I thought. Yeah. It's
oh, you know, I guess the main point
is simply that we're talking about something that
is instead of acknowledging
the obvious.
Not that we know for sure, but is
it surprising to you with all of these
things there that this happened?
Not even to say good or bad. Like,
it's interesting. The willingness, the desire to defend
this to the death
as it was what you were fighting 10
seconds ago is
I just it's it's incredible
and alarming.
But as Pauli points out, Elon Musk loves
mRNA. He even uses Tesla to build RNA
factories, micro factories, which we've talked about.
Tesla chief Elon Musk teams up with COVID
player, CureVac, to build RNA micro factories. Here's
a clip down here where of of him
talking about the transhumanist agenda.
And here's us covering it in 2022. Tesla
vaccine, RNA fact, microfactories.
As usual, demonstrating our value. We're ahead of
these stories by quite a bit because we're
simply continuing to cover it honestly and objectively
without partisanship.
And Andrea Lynn points out daily reminder, Elon
supports mRNA tech, which he said many times
over. Here he is in 2023. Synthetic mRNA,
otherwise known as modRNA, in this case, n
one methylpseudouridine
modified RNA, at least for the COVID shot,
have great potential to cure cancer.
Well, look at that. Here we are.
Funny how he's seeming like he's not included
in all this, and he's point pushing back
on all the yeah. I don't buy it.
Noor Bin Laden says, how about we stop
and this is the same thing Mario is
saying. Look at this. How about we stop
ingesting the poisons causing the cancers in the
first place? How about that? That might do
it instead of giving us more cancers with
the dangerous things you want us to take
to stop the cancers. Well, here's a clip
that overlaps this from the World Economic Forum.
It goes back a while, but she's talking
about how this MRA tech can be used.
And it's just one of the many things
they discuss. I just want you to consider
where this goes. When he's overlapping it with
an artificial intelligence pro
infrastructure
and everything we already know about nanotechnology
and everything we're dealing with here. And all
of this is interconnected with this exact rollout
through the same people we've talked about. Charles
Lieber, Bob Langer, DARPA, all of it. Listen
to what she says.
This protein RNA complex
and introduce it into cells or tissues
to correct mutations
at sites where we know there's a deleterious
change in the genetic code. Okay. So
problems. Right?
But if let's just say you wanted to
use it if there wasn't a problem. Maybe
just because you wanted to change something in
your own. That's we're talking eugenics here. Now,
yes, you can frame it as remove this
bad thing that's there. But if you listen
to what she goes on to say, which
I'll play right now,
this is eugenics
in another form,
which basically means the, like, the you know,
whether it's in it's well before Nazis. Right?
This actually comes from the United States government
agenda. But the point being and this is
that's not my opinion. This is the point
is that this became something that was adopted
from the Nazi agenda, which is why that
got real quiet all of a sudden, but
that's where eugenics truly began. And that is
about this this is about, like, purity,
which is not hard to see the overlap
of, like, the Zionist or the same overlapping
point in the United States. And it's about
saying that these certain bloodlines or these certain
people should be, you know, kind of washed
away from our genetic line to avoid, you
know, better the human species.
You don't realize the over connecting point to
both Israel and Germany in that case and
what they're doing. So just knowing that,
think about what you're saying here, and think
about how this can be applied, and think
about what they've already done and what they
seem to be rolling out. So I wanted
to show you an example of how this
can be utilized.
This, protein complex can actually be injected directly
into fertilized eggs of a mouse. And in
the experiment, you'll see we're targeting a gene
that is responsible for the black coat color
in mice. And so normally, these mice have
beautiful glossy black coats.
And once we make this targeted change, we
then implant these edited eggs back into a
a female mouse. And when she gives birth
to pups,
you'll see that the pups are now mostly
white.
Now this is not about racial at all.
Like, this is just simply the point is
they can decide which and what and how.
And the point is you can do this
and dictate
the outcome.
Right? So we're talking whether we're talking about
children or anything else, guys. I can I
we saw so many examples
of what was going on during all this
process? People were being experimented on
in a lot of ways.
But this is what this is at least
capable of whether or not you think that
was happening, and I want you to consider
where this seems to be going with the
kind of people we're talking about.
And the remarkable thing about this experiment
is that that when these mouse mice grow
up, you can test them and show that
every cell in the body has this single
genetic change that gives rise to the white
coat color. And then, of course, you could
patent that change. And then doesn't that make
you a patented being? A patented organism?
It literally does. Now there's a whole conversation
there that I've talked about a lot. Technically
speaking, there legally, you could patent life. But
today, there's this weird carve out for like,
I think we're getting to the point where
that will come out and and discuss the
idea that you have some kind of genetic
alteration from the mRNA shot, like Monsanto owning
owning your field because of the seed.
You may think that sounds crazy, and it
does sound crazy, but it's real. Now whether
it happens, who knows? May maybe, society will
prevail and they'll say there's no way we'll
ever let that. But realize, historically,
it goes in the directions of the industry,
of the elitist, of the people driving the
agenda.
So how long until we get there? Maybe
we're already there.
Now this is funny and scary at the
same time. 5 Times August says, think long
and hard about AI generated hands,
and then tell me you want an AI
generated shot injected into your body.
God. I mean, I hate even looking at
those things, man. Even, like, the the fake
AI people and hands, this stuff creeps me
out. Something very weird, like dark energy from
these things that I go well beyond some
image. That's my opinion. But the point is,
I said this is hilarious and terrifying all
at the same time. How
many have been wishing
warning about this nonpartisan agenda for years?
Nonpartisan, bipartisan, whatever. It's not unique to one
side. Many tried to warn of this before
the election
and were called black pill by the same
grifters now suddenly promoting AI created mRNA shots.
But isn't that, like, hilarious?
I can't think about that. Yeah. That's gonna
work out well for you. Right? But don't
worry. They'll test it on you first.
Well, chief nerd says Trump presented,
president Trump to halt funding on gain a
function. Signs the executive order.
Well, yes, arguably a good thing, but realize
that's already happened more than once, and it's
already gone back and forth more than once.
And they've already changed the name to EPPP
Research, so maybe that doesn't even apply. The
point is, guys, this seems crazy to me.
As I said, it never ceases to amaze
me how easy it is to manipulate partisan
support.
Do you realize what the entire mRNA project
is?
Right?
You do realize that. Right? That it's that's
that's exactly so if you're gonna pretend that
he's
halting gain of function, but then literally rolling
out an mRNA cancer shot, then you don't
understand what's going on here, guys. And what's
crazy to me is you can simply just
say, you know, oh oh, it seems like
today everyone's mad about the shot. Quick. Let's
sign this. Boom.
It's easy because they fall for it every
time or at least the ones that want
to.
To me, and I include that article again,
the idea that it's the platform itself, guys.
Or the reality around how this developed and
where it came from. This is what we're
dealing with. And, like I said at the
start actually, the idea that, remember, even they
claimed they all that, like, when Fauci got
confronted with it, he goes, no, we didn't.
We did EPP research. It's like, we you
just changed the definition, like, 4 seconds ago.
So maybe that's what that works here because
it says gain a function.
That's the quote, gain a function.
And on top of that guys, remember, before
this 2020 dynamic,
there was this back and forth in 2014,
I think. I forget the exact date where
they made it illegal, and then did it
anyway. And then they kinda walked it back
and then it went it it's it's all
narrative.
The main point is that if you don't
recognize what they're literally pointing to as they
roll it out is what he claims he's
stopping, then you're then you don't wanna see
it. Or you maybe don't know that and,
hopefully, you should do your research on it
and come to reality
about what's actually happening.
Now just rapid point here
about Maha and the overlap. Like, really think
about that. Like, what happened to this, guys?
Make America healthy again? I guess that's out
the window. Right? Or at least the anybody
honest is already gonna recognize that mRNA cancer
shots are so far such a far cry
away from what we pretended this was or
anybody wanted to think it was.
It just it it just shows you that
this is an illusion already.
Now,
Ian Carroll came out and said, all of
all of MAGA and MAHA, which what he's
I think when he says that he means
the people, not the government around it, but
the peoples that believe these movements
should oppose this project to their last breath,
he says.
We are the media now. Get loud. It's
one thing to fund AI innovation. It's a
different thing to give a golden ticket to
the CIA students and sociopathic murderer, I agree,
and give them oversight
over what could possibly be the in invention
of 8 artificial general intelligence paired with a
digital mass surveillance state. Hell, no. Right.
But here's what's frustrating. It's like so this
is Trump's plan.
So what's interesting, and you'll see this, the
same point here, he says, sorry, Larry Ellison,
but you're Fauci but until Fauci is in
prison, y'all can shove your mRNA technology up
your ASS.
But I said, and Trump.
Right? Who is right there with him?
And and it's not just Fauci either. It's
the it's the tech itself. So let's not
set them up to scapegoat Fauci and act
like all is well, guys. Like, that's what
that feels like. So wait until Fauci's gone.
Come on. Now, I'm not saying I know
one way or the other. You guys can
decide. Everyone loves to have an opinion about
Ian these days. I think sometimes he puts
out things that are solid. Sometimes I may
maybe he's just naive. Maybe he's lying. You
guys can decide for yourself. But nonetheless,
I've I'm this is what this is what,
this guy says.
I really do like to and appreciate a
lot of Ian's work, but this is the
kind of post that makes me question his
discernment.
To think Trump doesn't know the kind of
people he's dealing with shows you are either
dishonest or are missing the bigger picture. Now
I think he's reading that as when he
says MAGA, that means Trump's movement. But you
could argue he meant the people. But either
way, I agree that the idea is that
somehow it's like, well, guys, Trump
and, I mean, everybody, even Elon, despite his
pushing back, he is involved in all of
this. So to pretend Alex Jones' all day
over the last 2 days, pretending like this
is not his fault or he's being played.
I mean, god, if if you keep making
the argument that
in the midst of his administration, he doesn't
know what's going on, like, why do you
guys think he should be in power? You
can't play it both ways. You can't constantly
be fooled by all your advisors, but then
act like every move is some deep four
g chess move. So it just kills me.
But either way, yes, you should be getting
loud about it. But make sure it's about
who is actually responsible as Trump keeps praising
this entire thing.
And this and for the Free Thinkers Project,
responding to the same thing about this eun
you know, until Fauci's in prison, he says
this is completely systematic.
Seeing Trump laugh and grin with Ellison and
Altman announcing this, should be enough to make
everyone realize
no one in the system will be helping
us. We must help ourselves.
Sad thing is I think people just don't
care. I think they're invested.
Now Carrie adds another point to this, which
you probably have already seen. He said she
says, is it is it make America healthy
again to appoint the president and CEO of
a seed oil lobbying group to be chief
of staff of the USDA.
Well, that's what happened.
Like, that is one of the core things
that e that that RFP fights against. K.
There's just no under the only way you
make sense of this is to realize by
now that they used him,
or he's a part of it. I mean,
who look. Maybe tomorrow and for every day
for after, he changes everything, and I'll praise
it when it happens. But if you can't
stand up and go, fail.
Lie. Not what they promised. Then you're not
honest about this because that's crazy.
This person, Kaylee
how do you say that? TakaX
Bowler is coming to the agency from the
National Oil Seed Processing Association.
That is, like, the, like, the core. It's
just so crazy. Like, mRNA shots and oil
seeds. It's just seed oils.
It is just wild. It's like you're trying
to get people upset.
But it seems like it's working anyway. Some
of them are ignoring it.
Bottom line is that what it says it
says, daddy Trump is not coming to save
your health. So it's probably a great time
to take on the responsibility for yourself. You
start to see a similar message here,
and she includes the link like she does
so you can research it. And here's Gumby
pointing out the same thing. And she he
says, Trump has has so little respect for
the Maha fans that he just handed over
the high level USDA USDA position to the
top lobbyists for seed oil industry.
And I simply said, you're starting to see
it hopefully.
Many try to warn you.
Do you see why RFK has been silent?
This will be called out by everyone honest.
And as Derek says, anyone else notice RFK
Jr has been silent since Christmas?
Like, for the most part. And he says,
I mean, really, where has he been on
the campaign stuff?
Isn't this supposed to be a central part
of this? I mean, you realize that a
huge part of his support came from the
fact that that is why they thought Trump
was different. To blade.
And it says, is there and since there's
no date for his confirmation hearing, which whether
Trump wants him, it's still arguably not gonna
happen because the other parts of the government
don't want him.
Did those who voted for Trump because of
Mahoget played?
It's important to think about. And he adds
more information down here. You can read more
on it. It does seem like there is
a a confirmation hearing coming.
Now, James Lee adds this interesting clip, 2
minutes. Says, believe it or not, what people
need to understand is the mRNA cancer vaccine
is the sweetener.
Same kind of point about the what Corey
Diggs was saying. The real plan, AI powered
mass surveillance and control.
Now, realize this is important to see and
I'm glad that this that it's important to
recognize how long somebody like Whitney Webb has
been ringing this bell and how long people
and I'm not point James Lee, but people
out there who have been
either ignoring it or shouting her down for
telling you this is where it would end
up. So I'm glad to see him breaking
this out. Ellison already controls government data, owns
Legacy Media, Paramount, and now Trump's just handed
in Stargate.
As well as an Israeli controlled company, I
would argue, but I'm sure he'll call that
out too because he is. Here's what it
says.
Propose.
That's not it.
How do I do that? I did that
twice. That's frustrating.
Here is his clip.
Now remember, he's the one that did the,
the ADL documentary that we covered.
I'd interviewed him about it.
So that's why that's the kind of my
point. He's not he didn't shy away from
calling these things out.
Okay. Here we go.
We
gene sequence. Once we gene sequence that cancer
tumor,
you can make that vaccine, the that mRNA
vaccine.
So imagine early cancer detection,
the development of a cancer vaccine for the
for your particular cancer aimed at you and
have have that vaccine available in 48 hours.
This is the promise of AI and the
promise of the future. Yes. A cancer vaccine
can apparently be made in just 48 hours
according to Larry Ellison. This is gonna be
one of the biggest hoodwinks of all time,
and major alarm bells should be going off
in your head. Because first off, a, why
would they focus on selling you a miracle
cure for cancer
instead of just trying to prevent cancer in
the first place? B, it's interesting how they're
marketing this as a vaccine,
which conveniently they would not be liable for
if something were to go wrong.
Even if I give him the benefit of
the doubt here because I believe that some
people will be drawn to this kind of
miracle cancer cure,
Do you really trust a CIA agent to
have our best interest in mind? Yes. In
the 19 seventies, Larry Ellison's first project was
a database
code named Oracle for the CIA.
That was the start of his multibillion
dollar empire.
See how often that's the case?
We need to really ask whether that is
entirely
the case, which is what a lot of
people are beginning to argue.
The idea simply that whether it's XAI to
dark to to, you know, DARPA to Elon
or TIA to Palantir
or Oracle CIA, you know, Oracle to Oracle
today for Larry Ellison. Like, pretending these things
aren't exactly just an extension of the intelligence
apparatus. And then stand back and ask yourself
whether that is too far similar to what
we're seeing Israel do everywhere else, and maybe
that's just an extension of that same issue.
And if it wasn't for what we're seeing
today in this country and the administration and
the maybe that would be too far of
a stretch. Think about what we're seeing, how
the Zionist have packed themselves into this literally
arguing like what Stefanik just said, a biblical
right to take the West Bank. Think about
making these statements today while the world sees
a genocide and ask yourself whether it's that
far fetched to think about this simply being
the infiltration of the apparatus that we see
everywhere else. Now, it's extra thought. Obviously, just
the CIA doing it itself is just as
alarming in my opinion because ultimately, they're both
in conjunction with what's happening. But it's worth
considering with what we're seeing. How much willful
ignorance there are from people that know they're
being hurt by not pointing something out. Or
alternatively, by calling, you know, support for something
that they know the world doesn't agree with.
How often in history do politicians do that?
I made that point many times.
Wrote in the New York Times, quote, the
single greatest step we Americans could take to
make life tougher for terrorists would be to
ensure that all the information in myriad government
databases was copied into a single comprehensive national
security database. The miracle cancer cure thing, that
is a marketing ploy. This is all about
data, information, and control.
Citizens will be on their best behavior
because we're constantly recording and reporting everything that's
going on. But those kind of applications using
AI if we can use AI and we're
using AI to monitor the video. That is
the master plan. You And don't forget this.
Right? What did you just say?
We're monitoring everything.
Derek just wrote this. You can't hide.
That's literally the National Reconnaissance Office director saying
that you can't hide. We have eyes everywhere.
Elon Musk, artificial intelligence, building out the largest
spy satellite network around the world.
If you can't connect these dots, guys,
I can't help you.
The guys of
keeping us safe from terrorism
in order to usher in an AI backed
mass surveillance state. What if you don't like
that idea? Well, he's probably gonna try to
convince you because
probably not a coincidence. September of last year,
Larry Ellison now controls Paramount Global.
He is the majority shareholder of all of
these distribution channel. So if the podcast I
mean, it's crazy. MTV, Paramount,
what was it? I can't Showtime.
You know, a lot. CBS, a lot of
different moves so he can effectively control
the message.
And these are entertainment channels, also news channels.
And as of today, he is now going
after TikTok.
But one man, Larry Ellison, a billionaire, is
now in control of all of the government's
data, the future of medicine, policing,
the media.
We should all be very concerned. Now I
wouldn't say it's as simple as saying one
man
or even the one entity company controls all
of that. Like, obviously, we can see that
there's an intermixing of SoftBank, Oracle, Microsoft, but
clearly, they are in control of it, which
is terrifying in the same right. It's exactly
what he just said. Like, that kind of
centralization of power
should always be terrifying. This is what we've
always talked about. Even if they end up
doing right by you, who's to say the
next group will?
We just can't allow this, guys. And this
is where we're we gotta put our foot
down. I'm hoping enough conservatives could stand up
and make this clear. And usually, all that
means if we do is they just roll
it out later so we have to always
stay vigilant. That's the whole point. So on
top of that, we've talked about this many
times as well. Miss Q universe makes this
point. Microsoft's patent
would pair nicely with Trump's Stargate project. He
wants to take our blood and inject us
with mRNA vaccines because cancer. Well, Microsoft wants
to turn our bodies into human batteries to
mine cryptocurrency.
Remember that? It's
been relevant for a long time now. This
this we've talked about many times. It's simple,
guys. And here I'll just bring up the
actual patent.
Oh, this this is that's the other one
I'm used to, the oh, the regular patent
location.
This will show it too
as that loads.
There it goes.
Cryptocurrency system using body activity data. So, this
is from, weirdly enough, 2020.
And the whole point and now with the
overlap of crypto and AI and and the
COVID 19 injection dynamic, I mean, this is
crazy. And it very clearly talks about human
body activity associated with the task provided to
a user may be used in mining a
process of cryptocurrency system. So think this is
tokenization of your body, to where the idea
is that you can do things and that
you're rewarded with cryptocurrency for taking certain actions.
That this is overlaps with everything
from a social credit dynamic to the tokenization
of life in general to the I I
mean, this is where this all has been
going. Microsoft now involved with the AI infrastructure
rollout of $500,000,000,000.
And all I mean,
I just I don't think I need to
connect it, guys. It's obvious how all of
this could tie together with the technocratic direction
that we have been screening about.
It's worth considering.
Gary Dike, overlapping with the UK, says, well,
Trump is promoting
a combination of AI and mRNA shots simultaneously.
Right? Starmer, the current premier the leader of
the UK,
just said that AI will be, quote,
mainlined
into the veins of the United Kingdom.
Terminology and accident? You can decide for yourself.
Certainly could be. Or maybe because I just
want you to visually, you know, you know,
connect the dots, or maybe because they want
you to jump in it because it's of
conspiracy. He knows. But think about the timing
of that.
And of course, consider that it's literal.
It shouldn't be that hard for you to
put your mind to. The idea of maybe
there's a bigger inner I mean, here I'll
just grab this.
Internet of bio nano things is upon us.
I've talked about this many times.
And And even this picture right here, guys,
I mean, this is not even that this
is pretty old. It's talking about we've talked
the Internet of Things was has long come
and passed. That's like your refrigerator being connected
to the Internet. Okay? This is an even
Internet of nano things. We're past that. This
is about the idea of nanotechnology,
smart dust, being able to exist within your
body. I'm gonna talk about this more in
a company. I've been putting it off with
the nanotech part. I'm gonna get to more.
I've got some things I wanna show you.
But we've been talking about this.
And the idea being that your nano smart
dust technology, that's in fact, that we people
who deny that today, or at the very
least that they're claiming it's real, is right
in front of you. And the idea being
this is connected to the Internet. Now what
does that mean? Well, any number of things,
when we get into the idea of neuroscience
and what they're talking about right now, even
from the idea of being able to use
those sensors to relay data to them,
all of these things are concerning.
That is the Internet of bio nano things.
That's where we are, if not beyond.
That should be concerning with what they're doing.
So many people are just so afraid to
engage with this. It's all conspiracy theory as
it literally wraps around them.
Now,
the the just to I might just wrap
in general. A lot of the stuff that's
just at the end, it just kinda points
about, different perspectives in the partisan field and
others that call it out. What I thought
was funny is for after everything we just
showed you. Okay? Here's Trump speaking at Davos,
the World Economic Forum. Okay?
He did it virtually, that's why the background's
not there, probably for a reason. And it
says, president this is Alex Jones. President Donald
Trump just told Davos Globalists he'll make the
United States the world capital of artificial intelligence
in crypto.
No comment, surprisingly enough.
I just said, I don't know how you
can handle all this winning, Alex.
A 2 party illusion. I mean, my god.
Like, you're really not gonna go, that's a
problem, artificial world, capital AI.
Can you imagine if that was Biden or
Obama?
I mean, my god. How do people still
not see through this stuff?
Here's Malay or Malay or whatever you say
that at the World Economic Forum. But here's
how Simon Godic frames it. He showed up
at the WEF just to expose their entire
evil woke agenda.
Right. Because the only thing they care about
is genders and and woke ideology. Right? Or
is that the way they play us all
in order to rush us into the transhumanist
technocratic agenda when we're focusing on the genders
and and the Paris Climate Accord. Come on,
guys.
Obviously, there's people that care about this in
very real political sense. But if you can't
see by now that the World Economic Forum
is, I mean, do do you really think
they care at at at the core agenda
of whether or not we're talk that the
this is division tactics.
And Malay standing up there and going, there's
2 genders and I woke politics.
They don't care. They're going good. He's here.
He's we're supporting the technocratic agenda, pretending to
be a libertarian like all the rest of
them.
Next level trolling, he says. You see my
point, guys? This is the game today, apparently.
It's all a troll, and it's all we're
you know, my god. Meanwhile, the technocratic panopticon
has rolled out around you, but we like
he said, he called out the woke agenda.
Yeah. I think it's ridiculous too. But quite
frankly, seems like an obvious, obvious, obvious distraction
from what we're actually talking about today.
And same thing.
The same speech, by the way, where Trump
just said a world we're gonna you know,
he rolled up the whole thing. World act
the artificial intelligence and or in cryptocurrency.
But
he came out and said, the Paris climate
accord is bad and woke agenda stuff. And
so he goes, Trump declares war on the
NWO. Oh, you mean despite the new the
North American Union they're gonna do that's the,
like, literally part of that that you've never
called out?
I mean, this guy just can't stop saying
globalist NWO while never pointing at what's actually
happening or Israel or any of the parts
that actually matter to us rolling out.
But he loves to jump into the wedge
issues and talking points, but he goes, tells
the Davos elite that their anti human agenda
is over.
You mean, aside from being the world leader
in artificial intelligence, which is a leading element
of the anti human agenda?
Guys, I just can't even take this seriously
anymore. Like, we're look. You know, everyone keeps
trying to give me a hard time for
call if you can't see why this person
doing this is very relevant right now and
why I've suddenly been calling it out so
frequently, I mean, guys, it's right on the
surface, and it's important because this guy has
been one of these central players in this
that I've been consistent on calling out for
a long time, but now it's become transparent.
If you this is, like, from day to
day being exposed as completely dishonest.
People need to start seeing this. And now
as they're literally rolling it out, he's going,
he's attacking globalists and attacking their woke agenda,
ending the human anti human agenda while rolling
out the exact same thing.
Scary
that people believe this.
But here's off guardian, you know, somebody with
integrity and objectivity and says, there you go.
But please and this is the world I
can look for, by the way. But please,
let's keep talking about the woke bishop or
Elon's Hitler salute, which is what these the
Jones of the world are obsessed with right
now.
But here's what they're actually talking about and
realize this is where Millet was at and
where
Trump was speaking for.
An
end to anonymity
on social media.
In our countries, no one can walk the
streets with a mask on their face
or drive a car without a license plate.
No one can send packages without showing an
ID
or buy a hunting weapon without giving their
name,
and yet
we are allowing people to roam freely on
social networks without linking their profiles
to a real identity.
This paving the way for misinformation,
hate speech,
and cyber harassment.
But chief among them is anti semitism in
their minds.
And that is what everybody,
especially the current Trump administration,
is rabid about stopping
despite just like the shot, many of the
circle pretending like it's not really what it
looks like even as it rolls out around
them. Because it is facilitating the use of
bots,
and it is allowing people to act without
being held accountable for their actions.
Such
an anomaly cannot continue.
In a democracy, citizens have the right to
privacy,
not the not to anonymity or impunity
because
with those 2, social coexistence
would
be impossible.
Now you get the gist of it about
halfway there, but I wanna I wanna gonna
rush through these.
Tim Heathcliff, Hinkliff also points out, another one
of the is the Eurasia Group founder at
the World Economic Forum saying AI is going
to make most worrying for me human beings
more like computers,
as they roll it out.
So stipulating that we all are enthusiastic about
AI, but we're talking about risks. Yep.
Look, it's clearly going to make,
criminals more dangerous.
It's gonna make tinkerers make more consequential mistakes,
and it's gonna make, most worrying for me,
human beings more like computers. Mhmm. And what
I mean by that I mean, everyone's talking
about artificial general intelligence and when we're gonna
get there. Right. I think we're gonna get
to artificial human intelligence faster than we get
to artificial general intelligence,
AHI.
Right? Yeah. Is that what you want, guys?
I mean, it's inadvertently
driving you into this.
This is public. I mean and literally, everyone's
talking about AGI.
Well, that's not what the circles are pretending.
It's clear that this is something that is
a the driving agenda
that the WEF is talking about, and they
just rolled it out.
It takes a special kind of willful ignorance
to not see that. Right. I mean, Larry
Summers talks about how, you know, IQ will
become less important. EQ will become more important
with AI. I agree.
But AI is increasingly programming EQ out of
the people that use it. Right? And the
more powerful EQ the more powerful AI gets
and the more it's downloaded to give us
exactly what we want and engage with us
as, you know, even better than people, even
smarter than people, even more capable and facile
at treating us exactly the way we want
to, we are losing humanity. That undermines civil
society. It undermines democracy. That's, to me, the
most existential danger because the thing I care
about the most is persisting as we are
Right. As people. Right. Right. But let's roll
it out anyway though because that's he started
by going, we're all enthusiastic. We're doing it.
Right? But let me explain to you why
this is terrifying in my hers all.
Is that great? That's wild to me. Here's
another one.
This is showing
Borla and the rest of them. And this
is news. This is web 25. They're expecting
the backlash, and we'll try to convince the
public to accept AI systems and all this
digitalization by selling the benefits of AI like
they've been doing the entire time,
and Trump is rolling it out.
How much better does that AI have to
be than a human being?
It's 10 times better enough. It's 20 times
better. You know, you look at Waymo for
example based on their safety statistics of statistics.
Ruth, how much how much safer is Waymo
than human beings probably at this point? Meaningfully
safer, but your point is well taken. There's
not there there is more forgiveness when it's
a a human drive. So the question is
when a machine makes a mistake, when an
algo makes a mistake,
how does society look at that mistake and
the cost of that mistake versus the benefits
of AI coming into the fore? Well,
society reacts very badly. Right? As we've seen
with self driving cars, which are evidently safer.
And the question is,
will society change
as more technology comes? Right? Will there be
a backlash? Actually, Albert, let me ask you
this question.
So what Dara is talking about is building
much safer technology and facing a backlash. You
built
a product that was, like, the best product
the world ever had and probably saved the
lives of a bunch of people in this
room, and there was a massive backlash.
Is He's talking he's talking about the COVID
19 shots, obviously. Anything you learned from that
that will be helpful to people who are
bringing in new technologies
in the next years that They're still pretending
like it was success a success. It's just
absolutely crazy despite everything we know and and
the data and evidence. Even Fauci publicly admitting
in the article for cell.com that it was
a failure. Will be useful.
I'm sure you're referring to the the vaccine,
but it was not massive backlash. It was
significant.
It was maybe 10, 20% of the people.
I can tell you at the same time,
we received a lot of love from 80%
of the people that felt that their mother
or father is alive because of us. So
I don't believe that. So I don't believe
that. The fact that some of the voices
are magnified through social media doesn't mean that
they are the prevalent voice. But the example
that you use is a good one because
AI also will face the same problems and
probably AI machines will create the problems to
AI. They are the ones that they will
spread the disinformation
about it and why? Because it's a very
powerful tool And with every powerful tool in
the heads of good people, we'll do great
things. In the hands of bad people, we
can do bad things. And Of course. Alright.
So you can't have it. Right? We'll use
it to control you, but you can't have
it because then you could do bad things.
Simple. Right? Sort of like everything else. That's
how they see this world.
Now, I'm gonna do very quickly just because
I'm gonna wrap this right now. I gotta
get going. Include on all these which I'll
include, but just I'm gonna come end with
a couple of tweets up here. But I
want to rapidly show you, you know, so
we the example being that a lot of
people are standing up, just a thought, saying
most people, even MAGA, can agree that investing
billions in this direction is a red flag.
But Stargate isn't simply mRNA technology. It's quite
literally the technocracy that we have been warning
about for years.
That's what we're trying to highlight. And she
goes, I know this makes me black pill
and it's scary, but they're not hiding it,
guys. We gotta stop playing these games and
letting these manipulating grifting partisans
just deviate the conversation. Thank Matt Kim's calling
it out.
Basically saying that that the same thing. Just
to wrap it up. The point is these
people trust the plan. Keep exposing them. He's
close. Keep exposing them. There's always a narrative
to justify why it's not what it looks
like. But he sees it. He's calling it
out. And then what's funny, he says right
here, the left said dress the science, and
we laughed at them, and now it's flipped.
Now it's the same thing on the other
side.
Truth speaker says it's hilarious watching MAG and
Colt defend Trump's mRNA.
Doc Malek saying, danger. There's a pandemic rage
ravaging the west. It's called Trump delusion syndrome.
Highlighting people lying about this. Doctor Shiva, not
mincing words as usual. MAGA morons rejoice at
Trump for rescinding COVID mandates for illegal immigrants
while 5 hours ago, fathered the vaccine Trump
presented his plans for
mRNA
AI powered vaccines
via ultra Zionist Mossad CIA agent Larry Ellison,
which also matters. Right? But it's also SoftBank,
which seems to be completely influenced and run
by Israeli intelligence.
But
the point though is that I would Port
and I would argue to argue that plenty
of people in MAGA are freaking up about
this right now. So it's not everybody. I
argue it's more about the manipulating team sport
politics at all. Kerry says, imagine how a
lot of MAGAs would react if Democrats cooked
up this exact deal. As always, that's very
important to think about. David Knight is the
one that pointed this out, what I said
earlier. $500,000,000,000
to an AI project where people in the
Western North Carolina freeze. Like, isn't that the
big thing? It only matters when you can
make a democrat look bad, apparently.
Hopefully, North Carolina people can suddenly recognize that.
David Icke, simply saying, this is what we've
been warning about.
Right? We've been warning.
He says there's so much more to come,
and he says he's simply people saying, we
love you, Elon, and ignoring it. All these
alternative grifters and sycophants are simply lying to
you and trying to convince you, like, you
know, the typical ones you expect.
And here he is calling him out saying,
Musk billing in our mate, Larry Ellison, and
shareholder an ex pushing mRNA fake vaccines and
AI for cancer on the 2nd day of
office.
I did warn you that Trump and Musk
was a monumental scam, but so few wanted
to know.
And then he calls them all out down
here saying they're all saying, we're winning USA,
Rogan, Carlson Brand, Peterson, all of them, same
thing.
And then same thing here, Elon Musk, Alex
Jones saying, see the the full Trump led
Stargate press conference where big tech tycoons featured
all it, but time from AI driver. Basically,
if you get into these and I unfortunately
looked through most of the point is that
it's all about presenting the line on Twitter
about how we look skeptical and then spending
4 hours shilling for Elon Musk and Trump.
And David Ike says you promoted Trump and
now you're getting very quickly what I said
you would get. You don't have a sheer
smear of humility in the face of this,
but present yourself as the resistance
when you made yourself a facilitator
of what I warned you about. Get Trump,
and you get the AI tech mafia.
It wasn't obvious, was it?
And here, we can't be this naive
in interviewing Robert Malone.
We're literally shilling about this whole thing and
saying Trump shouldn't be responsible, but then having
Malone come on and say that we're being
I mean, it's playing both sides of this.
And this person says, just be quiet. I
used to listen to you religiously and remember
you hearing, clear as day, say that you
would never support Trump if he didn't walk
back on the mRNA.
Look it up. And here we are. So
how many times can we be played?
This person pointing out the same thing.
Saying and this oh, this is Jeff Burwick,
by the way. Saying you did your job,
Alex. You helped Trump get in and keep
people from
realizing it's all the Jones plantation.
Now you can go back to saying how
bad it is, and they roll out their
$500,000,000,000
Orwellian police state mRNA force injections, a term
be like, you know, now go on to
go bad bad bad even though you literally
facilitated the process.
Same thing with this one. 1 AI to
rule them all.
Really? I mean, my god. Like, this is
exactly the point. And he goes, we're all
ready. You can't blame Trump, and it's only
day 3. So if you watch it, as
opposed to the idea of making it sound
like you're against it all. Well, if the
idea is, well, these guys are bad, but
we Trump is not for fault.
You're still playing the same game.
So I wanna play some of these before
we wrap.
This is important because this is exactly what
it's already been coming, what the World Economic
Forum has already been rolling out, the same
place they're working with right now, and this
is the future that they're working this this
is all overlapped, guys. It brings everything together,
and this is what they've been planning for
quite a long time. And everyone there in
that room from SoftBank to Allison to Oracle,
everything, this all interconnects with the World Economic
Forum, the US government,
Israeli government, intelligence apparatus, the deep state, Zionism,
technocracy. All these different things are merging right
now in a blob that
should concern us all.
Hello, everybody. I'm Nicholas Thompson. I'm the CEO
of The Atlantic, and I will be your
moderator today. We are going to have an
incredible
session. Star of the show is Nida Farahani.
Now, I'm just gonna go get show you
a couple parts of this. Now, this is
the first thing that you probably already seen.
Now, this is supposed to be a an
example of where the world goes. And this
is supposed to be, she says, the not
alarming
example.
You're in the zone. Even you can't believe
how productive you've been. Your memo is finished.
Your inbox is under control,
and you're feeling sharper than you have in
a decade.
Sensing your joy, your playlist shifts to your
favorite song,
sending chills up your spine as the music
begins to play.
You glance at the program running in the
background on your computer screen
and notice a now familiar sight that appears
whenever you're overloaded with pleasure,
your theta brainwave activity
decreasing
in the temporal regions of your brain.
You mentally move the cursor to the left
and scroll through your brain data over the
past few hours.
You can see your stress levels rising
as the deadline to finish your memo approached,
causing a peak in your beta brainwave activity
right before an alert popped up telling you
to take a brain break.
But what's that unusual change in your brain
activity when you're asleep?
It started earlier in the month.
You send a text message to your doctor
with a mental swipe of your cursor.
Could you take a quick look at my
brain data?
Anything to worry about?
Your mind starts to wander to the new
colleague on your team whom you know you
shouldn't be daydreaming about given the policy against
intra office romance.
But you can't help fantasizing
just a little.
But then you start to worry that your
boss will notice your amorous feelings
when she checks your brain activity
and shift your attention back to the present.
God. Like, total Orwell 1984,
Brave New World, like, monstrous overlap. Like, that's
terrifying.
And this is supposed to be the non
concerning like, the non alarming example.
You breathe a sigh of relief when an
email she sends you later that day
congratulates you on your brain metrics from the
past quarter, which have earned you another performance
bonus.
You head home jamming to the music
with your work issued brain sensing earbuds still
in. Ick.
When you arrive at work And realize that
that patent for those earbuds that do that
are already there. I've showed you this many
times. Apple has a patent for those, Probably
already in use for all we know. Day.
A somber cloud has fallen over the office.
Along with emails,
text messages, and GPS location data,
the government has subpoenaed employees' brainwave data from
the past year.
Now why would you even make this example?
Like, what's the interest of making this
the why why would you even include? Because
you want people to know.
Be be on your best. This
is we're gonna be watching. I mean, think
about being given this presentation and then including
this. You didn't need to include this. The
the example was but well, we clear about
what was happening, but you need to let
us know that the government will come this
is it just blows my mind. This is
like when the US government does an exercise
about, like, the Crimson Contagion 1. But we've
talked about many of them. And in the
exercise, it actually plays out that the US
government got caught lying to the people about
what was going on. Like, why would they
write that in there? They've done it more
than once.
I think we know why, guys. It's all
about social engineering. Like this and the point
is that so many people are afraid to
acknowledge
that because they're trained to think it makes
them a conspiracy theorist. It's all psychological, man.
And this is part of it. They have
compelling evidence that one of your coworkers
has committed massive wire fraud.
Now they're looking for his coconspirators.
You discover they are looking for synchronized
brain activity
between your coworker and the people he has
been working with.
While you know you're innocent of any crime,
you've been secretly working with him on a
new start up venture.
Shaking, you remove your earbuds.
Yeah. End of the story. Good times. Right?
Welcome to the future. Well, how about the
reality that, I guess, we just trust those
2 men in that room, just know how
to tell the difference. Right? Or maybe the
developing process will go over as many people
go to prison. You know? You see how
see how dumb this becomes when they don't
care about that. It's about something completely different.
It's about you being in control
or under control.
The idea being is that, well, maybe that
project that was not related has a very
similar brainwave and they don't have the or
maybe the AI makes a mistake or maybe
it's trained to for very clear reasons. Maybe
you spoke of said the wrong thing about
the Musk master on Twitter.
I mean, think about it, guys. I mean,
the point is, obviously, it could become something
that is dark and dystopian, and I don't
know why we don't all see that already.
Now this goes further
as we've talked about many examples of this.
The next one I wanna show you,
where is it? It's right here.
Hold on.
I just had the full video this time,
so it's easier to do you wanna dip
there we go.
This is about the
you know, so we talked about the earbuds.
This is the same thing, but just for
the different this Apple has a patent for
them, but this is something else.
There may be good reasons why we want
to be able to find better ways to
monitor whether somebody is paying attention
or they're doing something different.
The newest way to monitor attention
is through a device like this one.
These are EarPods
that are launching later this year.
These EarPods, much like the video you watched
earlier Is there this is a years old
video too. Are EarPods that can pick up
brainwave activity and tell whether or not a
person is paying attention
or their mind is wandering. Pre b. Okay.
Well, you might think,
fine. But even if we can tell whether
a person is paying attention or their mind
is wandering, you can't tell what they're paying
attention to.
You would be wrong. Mhmm. Turns out that
you can not only tell whether whether a
person is paying attention
or their mind is wandering, but you can
discriminate between the kinds of things that they're
paying attention
to. Whether they're Yeah. We're talking about we're
talking about mind reading, guys. It's not that
hard to see. And this is we're well
beyond this with what we can see with
the different presentations of this. Or James Giordano
showing you how far this really goes. Because
this is well beyond what's happening right now
in front of us. Now on top of
that, this is where it gets even more
terrifying. Like, this this is again, they, like,
jovial
example
of something that should scare us all.
Lagging cognitive decline over time
and using it as a way to discriminate
against them.
We might soon, even, use the technology
to help people wake back up.
This is a haptic scarf that MIT Media
Lab has developed, which uses brainwave technology in
a responsive way to give a person a
little buzz,
literally,
when their mind starts to wander to help
them refocus and hone their attention. Great. Obedient
workers that get shocked when you stop paying
attention.
That's what she just said.
Welcome to the future. And now they're rolling
out their AI system that's gonna make all
of this possible.
Now as Richard Willett points out,
Larry Ellison, who Trump just partnered with for
the Stargate dynamic, has already wanted to introduce
digital IDs
well back after 911.
Here's the article from the New York Post.
Ellison's
Ellison of Oracle seeks US ID cards. And
that's and if you read it, this is
what it's about.
This is all all a part of a
larger agenda. This is the guy who now
is in charge of the huge database structures
backing by backed by a $500,000,000,000
in Donald Trump.
Now, again,
you can't hide.
It's a direct quote
from the op the National Reconnaissance Office. Now
you can't hide because you're constantly being looked
at.
This was scary before this all happened.
Now think about that. With everything we just
showed you, look at the image.
And he says in here that Elon Musk
is gonna help us with artificial intelligence. That's
how it's all gonna come together.
And realize it's SpaceX that is built, that's
putting the satellites out there. Like, this is
the technocratic panopticon that we've been warning about.
And it's not just in space, guys.
Now in general, again,
I just said it's almost like many of
us tried to warn you about exactly what
you're now talking about. And instead of caring,
you called us black pill and made 10
posts about how Elon Musk was saving free
speech while he was censoring for Zionism.
And Conroe Misty says, don't be so blackpilled,
Brian. The point is we're watching this roll
out, and we are still being told we're
wrong or blackpilled as it literally happens.
That needs to show you something. And as
Bob Moran points out, Moran says, it's almost
as though
this is pretty complicated, but stick with me
now,
if you voted for the most successful and
unapologetic
salesman of mRNA products who's ever lived, you
ought to have known that he would immediately
start trying to sell you more mRNA products.
Right.
Logic.
Hard for partisan.
But he also simply puts out a new
cartoon,
says,
I he says, I told you so, and
it says, it's not big enough.
And here's doc doctor Ben Tapper. Another one
that I think is, you know, somewhat supportive
of Trump, and I think I've I've not
I haven't followed up until recently, but he
comes out and says get me off this
planet. 2nd day in office, and he's pushing
a cancer vaccine. Are you kidding me? Make
no mistakes. This will cause more harm than
good. Health doesn't come from a needle.
Speak up, guys.
Now is the time to speak up. Gonna
wrap it there. It's been a long show
today, guys, but I appreciate you staying with
us. This this is a lot to talk
about. I'm gonna be hope I'll try to
do a show tomorrow, I can't guarantee it.
It's a lot I'm gonna be, going
just a lot going on. I'll fill you
guys in as soon. The point is that
this important information needs to be discussed.
Break this down, clip it out, tag me
as I've talked about in the past. You
know, I'll I'll I'll happily continue to boost
that up if you guys wanna make these
clips because it makes it easier. And as
the more we have to deal with all
these dumb lawsuits and the financial stuff of
it, I'm having to pull the belt back
and so there'll be less clips coming out
in general.
But while we will get back there, I'm
determined.
But as of right now, you find a
part in the show that you appreciate, that
you think is important, or you wanna break
it down into a condensed version. Put it
out there and do it every single time,
and I'll share you every single time. Like,
I it's important to to get the smaller
parts out there, to get the reach out
there, but the information is important.
All of this is out there, guys. All
of it's in front of you.
Find the time. Find the courage
to stand up and point it out. That's
all we need right now. We just need
that momentum, enough people to stand up and
make that clear to where it cannot be
ignored by any of the manipulations any further
because this is going forward no matter what
we do, I think. Unless we're somehow able
to get enough momentum to make them see
that it's not in their interest to roll
it out now. As always, the opportunist aspect,
it's all but it will come back.
So we have to remain vigilant as always.
We have to keep fighting what we know
what everybody seems to recognize is the wrong
direction other than those that see an interest
in it or are being influenced to lie
about it.
That's my opinion anyway.
But thank you for tuning in, guys. Thank
you for your support.
As always,
I love you all.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.