For the last few years, I've had this
sense that everything I learned as a kid
about how America's government works is completely wrong.
But I had no idea how bad things
actually were until I saw this one graph.
Researchers at Princeton University looked at more than
20 years worth of data to answer a
pretty simple question. Does the government represent the
people? Now, this is what they found.
This axis here represents public support for any
given idea. On the left at 0% are
ideas that not a single American wants. On
the right at 100%
are ideas that everyone supports.
This axis represents the likelihood of congress passing
a law that reflects any of these ideas,
from a 0 to a 100% chance.
On this graph, an ideal republic would look
like this. If 50% of the public supports
an idea, there's a 50% chance of it
becoming law. If 80% of us support something,
there's an 80% chance.
You get the idea. Now, most Americans would
probably agree that, with a few exceptions, we
should be as close to this ideal as
possible. Unfortunately, the way America actually works
doesn't even come close.
Take an idea that nobody supports,
literally nobody, and it has about a 30%
chance of becoming federal law. Now, take an
incredibly popular idea. The most popular idea this
country has ever seen, and there's
also about a 30% chance of it becoming
law.
This means that the number of American voters
for or against any idea has no impact
on the likelihood that congress will make it
law.
Put another way, and I'm just gonna quote
the Princeton study directly here. The preferences of
the average American appear to have only a
minuscule,
near zero, statistically
non significant impact upon public policy. So if
you've ever felt like your opinion doesn't matter,
and that the government doesn't really care what
you think, well,
you're right,
but there's a catch.
This flat line only accounts for the bottom
90% of income earners in America.
Economic elites, business interests, people who can afford
lobbyists,
they get their own line.
Look at how much closer their line is
to the ideal. When they want something, the
government is much more likely do it. And
when they don't, they have the power to
completely block it from happening, no matter how
much the rest of the country supports it.
They get what they want, and guess who
ends up paying for it.
We pay for it with the most expensive
health care in the world. We pay for
it with a tax code that's a complete
mess. We pay for it with internet that's
slower and more expensive, with wasteful spending, a
floundering education system, a catastrophic
drug war, and 1 in 5 American children
born into poverty. Almost every major issue we
face as a nation can be traced back
to this graph.
Welcome to the daily wrap up. A concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent
news as we see it from the last
24 hours.
Tuesday, January 21, 2025.
Thank you for joining me today. You've seen
that clip many times. I still think it's
very relevant, and, no, you should not blindly
take what they find in that study at
face value. But thinking about what they did
find in a Princeton study, which is held
in many circles in high regard, is that
we don't live in a democracy.
Not only not in democracy, we don't live
in a representative government. We live in an
oligarchy. Now what's hilarious about that is Biden
just said that's what's going on even though
we already all knew that if we weren't
lost in a partisan circle somewhere.
We already have lived in this situation for
a very long time, and it's not unique
to left or right. And as usual,
if Biden says that this is an oligarchy,
that means that we are not and they
are is how the partisan mindset works. But
I'm seeing increasingly more people not fall for
these lazy traps.
It's about trying to keep you looking at
one side versus the other. And as I've
said so many times more so in the
last few months than ever, if we're only
looking at half the problem, we will never
actually solve that problem. And that's exactly what
the oligarchy
banks on. So as we're gonna go through
today with a lot of a lot of
random things to talk about
from the executive orders to Donald Trump's discussions
to the seemingly
the reality of what the Doge Organization is
really going to be.
And, of course, the most important story, it
seems, the ongoing genocide that no one wants
to talk about because we're obsessed with Elon
Musk's Nazi salute or whatever the hell you
think is going on.
It's very clearly by design in my mind.
Whatever you thought that was, real or not,
meant to make you look anywhere but all
the other things actually going on. Well, we're
debating about a day's difference about January 6th
is being released, which matters, of course,
or is gesture.
And these things are ultimately either a benign
concept or something that shows you ease of
way you know, things that are not the
real story today.
And yet it is over is it has
eclipsed everything.
I mean, they what's going on in the
West Bank, for example, which even people that
are talking about Gaza seem to be in
some circles missing, is the continuation of the
genocide because they flattened all of Gaza. That's
the picture of today. It's gone, guys. We'll
go over that. I said that that was
one of my concerns in the first place.
Let's just say this goes exactly the way
we want it to. Where are they gonna
go? And I already see this being brought
up in certain conversations from Trump's administration about
trying to find a new place for them
to go because we're trying to help them,
aren't we? Or not.
Literally, the exact extension of the plan that
we all predicted that when we came to
this point, they would try to justify moving
them somewhere else. You can you wonder why?
Because Israel wants the territory. Just like Israel's
building a new base inside of Syria
because they wanted the territory. It's pretty obvious.
I mean, it's just it's this transparent game
that's been played from the very beginning. And
all we get is shouted down by people
and power structures and media that don't care.
But you see it.
We all see it. That's the frustrating part
we keep bumping up against is how does
that not change everything? Well, we need to
sit back and recognize from the first point.
It's because we do not live in a
representative government. They don't care what we think,
but they love to pretend if they get
just a few screaming people with lots of
followers to say that's the case, that maybe
we can convince everybody else that despite all
of the evidence,
how terrible their lives have become, all the
murder going on, all of the justification of
all the crimes, that just because they say
so, we'll put it to bed and pretend
like we're living in the fantasy we always
do. I mean, the the frustrating part is
that we can have something better,
that
we're not even done better. We can have
what we originally the idea
like, taking a step back, I you guys
know that I believe in things like the
constitution.
But in only in the context that
if we're forced to live within a state
of society. And I make that important that
I think that's important difference.
But so in that mindset because I wanna
make sure people understand that. That if I
had my choice, it would not government wouldn't
exist. But the idea being that I do
believe that there's a foundation there that makes
sense within this society. And the point is
that we could have something.
We could have what we pretend we have
if we actually stopped ignoring
all the problems,
all the very clear things because of some
partisan agenda. So what a lot we're gonna
go through today is, sadly, the extension of
what we've already been seeing, the ongoing development
around these stories that are just so shockingly
obvious
that it blows my mind that we can't
have an honest conversation about this. I mean,
even amongst a lot of people that see
it. Because, I mean, I get it. It's
confusing. There's a lot of people that we're
told to listen to and trust. And the
point is, as always, you trust yourself.
Question everything. Question me. Question Trump. Question everything
while considering all possibilities.
It's the only way to go about any
honest engagement. Whether or not we live in
a propagandized world or not, people can just
make mistakes. They can be wrong. And we're
seeing a hell of a lot of that
today on top of what I think is
deliberate.
Deliberate miss misrepresentation,
deception.
I mean, right now, with with the Doge
point, for example, we'll get to, it seems
very clear that this was laid out as
something almost the exact opposite of what it
becomes. Now, again, we're at a point where
we haven't seen more action. But we are
starting to see action. Executive orders, for example,
I would count as action in the direction
of something specific. But even within that, you
could then say, well, let's see how that
action is carried out. And that's a fair
point. But as we continue to step in
the wrong direction, as I would see it,
we need to make sure we call them
out. But there's also plenty of things I
could point out that I think are somewhat
well, let's just even say good things.
But being done as an executive order already
makes me want you know, it's it's a
concern with how this is being played out.
The rule by executive order that Steve and
I spoke about this morning, and and Garland
Nixon, by the way, who I'm happy to
see this morning. I haven't seen him in
a long time. He's currently being censored by
Twitter.
It's it's just this
further and further we take steps away from
even what we pretend we are. And the
idea of rule by executive order is always
saying, well, it's because they would stop it.
Right. The other side. Okay. So fine. So
let's just pretend that's the case.
Then then they come into power and they
nix all of what you rolled out like
we saw the last time, and they roll
out their executive orders, which, weirdly enough, only
apply to the executive branch, but we pretend
like it rules everything. And so now we
live in a world where we do not
have even the illusion of that, but we
still call it a democracy. I mean, it's
just it's it's frustrating. But I do understand
the logic of saying that, well, let's say
they you see them as the bad guys,
you wanna roll out what you want. But
if you know it's only potentially can only
last for 4 years, then what's the real
point there? Well, it seems to start to
develop a picture where each side pretends
they're going to eventually find a way to
stop that from happening. Which isn't it's like
just beneath the surface right now in this
administration. Like they said last time. Like, well,
like what Elon said even before. Right? If
we don't win, we'll never have another election.
Which is, again, always possible, but what was
that based on? But isn't it interesting how
they both kinda see so now we won,
so now we're gonna make the world. Well,
now we're gonna win forever. Well, what does
that mean?
Democrats could win in 4 years if we
pretend that's how it goes. You get where
I'm going with this. So right now, all
of this is starting to kinda blow up
in everyone's faces.
All these different moves from the North American
Union, from Davos speaking World Economic Forum, Donald
Trump, and Elon Musk being exposed for the,
you know, pleading with them to let him
inside until now he kinda pretends to buck
it. I think they're all in the same
circle. I mean, one after another, these things
are showing you that these people do not
believe in even a fraction of what they
promised.
This Israel part to me is important. We're
gonna finish with the latter half of the
show today.
Because we need to understand
how transparent these changes are and what Donald
Trump has already done. E I mean, how
how are we even pretending like this was
other than a well, let's put it this
way. Even the momentary pause does not seem
to have actually even taken effect. Because they're
still killing children. And I can prove it
to you, every day we've gone past this.
But we do see food going in, which
interestingly proves exactly the point we've been making,
that Hamas has not been hijacking food.
But, overall,
they're going to continue the genocide. They're it's
right on the surface. And, you know, and
and Netanyahu shifting into the West Bank and
and rounding up people, about as many as
they released, which is exactly what happened last
time. So they're not really changing anything while
Donald Trump pats himself on the back and
calls himself the peacemaker for the rest of
the 4 years, despite Netanyahu not even stopping.
Not I mean, he in Syria, in Lebanon,
they've they've violated the Lebanon cease fire every
single day since this started.
Ask ask plenty of people breaking this down.
Some in some western journalists in Lebanon and
so on. But yeah. So I I I
digress. I'm
so much to get into.
And so many things that are so frustrating
that I wanna make sure we kinda start
the conversation with in our mind. But we're
gonna start today with a with a a
few points around the inauguration. That's gonna be
kind of a opening feel about this and
and different shifts that we're seeing. A lot
of hype.
Oh,
I almost forgot.
That's actually pretty funny.
Let me show you something. This is where
I'm gonna start. Well, I'll finish my kind
of my general idea. We're we're gonna get
into the inauguration points
and
some weird things that happened there. But I'll
let you guys decide if you think they're
meaningless or not. The scene just opened the
door to, like, maybe we're all being played
in a much larger way than we realize.
Like, it's all a theater kind of a
show, which aligns up with a lot of
what we've talked about. TikTok, we're gonna talk
about that, how it plays into it, but
then an important overlap with the, executive orders
and the
artificial intelligence overlap, which seems to be the
real direction. Even the declaration of emergency seems
to be being used aimed at the border,
but being used for something else. And I
exactly what what I was worried about.
And we're gonna go through all of that.
We're gonna talk about an interesting pointer on
cryptocurrency. Another pump and dump with Trump's coin
as well as the bruv coin from
Andrew Day. Both of which were like, we're
making money and then 0.
Just which, by the way, is a pump
and dump. You do not have we'll go
over it. I mean, people in America are
being played already by this, and you can
call it an accident.
And we're gonna get into a lot more
around it. We're gonna finish with the point
around the foreign policy. But what do I
wanna start with today? Which I'm so so
very glad that I did not forget this
because it is striking.
It it it really is something that blows
my mind. So here, this is
the example I wanna start with in regard
to misinformation coming from the main mainstream alternative
media. Now the reason I wanted to start
with this is because it's interesting to see
the deviation from or rather the I guess
the deviation from the from what was being
stated.
From what will happen after the inauguration, what
will happen before the inauguration, what Trump is
going to do with this, what is he
gonna do with that, or or the drone
conversation, as I was telling you before. Every
day, we saw a different narrative about what
the drones were, what it was gonna do,
what we're bringing, and then it just drifted
into the background. Now my point was, we
have to be sure that we see that,
whoever is doing that, because it shows you
a consistent
dishonesty.
And I'll show you what I mean.
So this
I should never ready, so oops. Hold on.
I gotta do that again.
This is I have it on a separate
screen. That's why I almost forgot it. Here
is what we're gonna start with.
This Oh, look at that. I even got
it sized up just right on the fly.
Okay. So here is what I've been talking
about.
K. So the whole time we've been hearing
about this, right, the hype of what's going
to happen, the Democrats aren't gonna let it
happen, they're going to overthrow the government, they're
going to cause false flags, they're gonna carry
out a a pandemic.
All to stop Donald Trump because we know
they just can't let that happen.
Now, if I had seen something that was
maybe thwarted,
maybe they did something, you know, you could
of course, the argument will always be that
because of whatever they did that you didn't
see, they were able to stop it all.
Whatever you can do to make up a
story to make it make sense. Sort of
like when Trump does something nobody likes, well,
there must be a reason. No. There mustn't
be a reason. Maybe he just lied to
you. But here's what I wanna point out.
Just just so it's clear, you can go
back much further. And in between this date
and right now, you could find probably 500
well, it's not gonna be hyperbolic.
Let's see probably 20 more examples that I
just didn't pluck out because I only searched
for the word inauguration. So here it is
on January July 24, 2024.
And by the way, I do think it
is pretty strange. This guy went through a
rapid transition.
I just noticed as I was going through
the times. With with Alex Jones in this
picture,
pretty heavyset. And I'm I mean, over the
process of, like, a month, he seemed to
have lost his. That's not healthy. Even losing
weight that fast can be dangerous, but good
for him for losing weight if that's actually
what happened. Seems his own audience questions whether
he's even him anymore, but which is not
what I think. I just think it's funny.
So here he says on July July 24,
2024,
agent who ran Biden's inauguration war game says
Trump assassination,
a false flag event.
Sure.
Is if anybody anybody that would argue that's
not possible is ridiculous. Of course, it's possible.
False flags happen all the time. Assassination attempts
do happen. It would not surprise me,
but I didn't see any evidence at the
time. If you remember I talked about it,
I said, okay. Interesting. Where's the evidence? He's
got a guy that said, okay.
Now Iffia just covered it a couple of
times because that was inside information, and we
referenced it in other things. That's that's one
thing. That's a journalist can talk about hypotheticals.
Right? What I'm gonna show you is the
relentless,
relentless
multiple times a day, nonstop. There's gonna be
a false flag. There's gonna be violence in
the inauguration. The democrats are gonna coup the
government over and over and over until it
doesn't happen.
And I'll show you how it ends, which
is actually ridiculously hilarious.
Tell me what you think. July 24th,
October 18th, breaking. Elon Musk doubles down on
second amendment as Democrats prepare for civil war
conditions between election day and inauguration day. That's
October 18th.
This one is November 8th.
Alex Jones raised the alarm over the deep
state's next move to sabotage Trump ahead of
his inauguration.
I'm I'm actually curious in the chat. Do
you have you seen any literally any indication
other than words and and government people saying
bad things about Trump? As far as I
can see, I've seen nothing but coordination.
Working with Biden in the White House to
make a deal with Ukraine,
growing the more motorcade together, sitting at the
same
you show me where I'm missing something.
This one's from
November 10, 2024.
Democrat deep state's plan to install Harris in
presidency before his inauguration.
Right? Didn't seem to happen.
November 10th.
This one, again, November 10th, 4:0:9.
This one's November 10th, 8 o'clock.
Same thing. Cool alert. Democrat deep state planning
to install Harris in president. So by the
way, you'll get those almost every day where
it's just the reiteration of the same thing
4 more times in a different way, and
then you screen capture and do it again.
That's pretty much just spam. Okay? The point
is, nonetheless,
it's the repetition of the same claim with
0 evidence other than in some cases, somebody
backing it up because I had a prophecy
or because I think the same thing or
because I come from the government, which aren't
we supposed to question the government?
I guess just not the ones that they
like, like today.
November 11th.
Are there democrats are plotting to install Harris
as president. So same story.
No more evidence the next day, pushing the
same thing. This one's November 12th.
Raise alarm on the deep state's next moves
ahead of Trump's inauguration.
Speaking to Marjorie Tully Green about it. Because
she has some insight. Right? Well, she is
the government, by the way.
To me, just the same government as either
one of your pretend sides you wanna pretend
there. It is the government telling you what
they want you to get. And Alex Jones,
face value.
Real good journalism.
Here,
December 4th,
Alex Jones breaks latest on new globalist orchestrated
pandemics ahead of the Trump inauguration.
Sure. I'm not gonna dismiss the idea that
they could fake pandemics or they would lie
about it for x, y, and z. But
what's the point about the inauguration? Where's the
evidence for that? What was their what was
the plan? Well, it didn't happen.
That's clear.
Here it is from 18th
December.
It's a psyop. DIA whistleblower says deep state
using UAVs. We talked about this one to
distract from their own criminal activity. Goal is
to trigger it before the inauguration.
Okay? Well, it turned out pretty clearly that
that thing was that was being promoted by
both sides. And as Evan Rand Paul pointed
out, that the whole thing led to the
idea where they were trying to use legislation
to roll out more technocratic surveillance.
They all promoted, not the surveillance
legislation, but the drive to push the narrative.
And this is my point. At the time,
UAVs and all these conversations, every day, he
had a different narrative about what the drones
were, what and he referenced the same radioactive
sniffing dynamic, which is happening right now again,
or before the inauguration, rather. And I'll show
you that in a second, even though they
do it literally every time. We make that
point every time. I think he hypes it
every time. They do it before Super Bowls.
It could mean something, but it it if
it happens every time, the simple act itself
is not this I they're searching for nuclear
war. You know, it's about trying to hype
the idea that there's something coming based on
nothing other than your desire to get people
worked up. Now realize that we're not even
halfway through these. This isn't even all of
them. The point is that there are people
that would've could have taken violent action because
they thought they were doing something to protect
something.
See what I'm saying? Like, this kind of
this this is exactly what they do when
they point to people like us and say
we're causing violence and radicalization. Now to be
clear, he has the right to say whatever
he want. That is free speech, but we
also have a right to go, he's a
manipulator. He is clearly hyping nonsense to get
you hyped up, and that is what they
use to divide you.
Here it is from December 26th.
Says deep state cooler. Democrats launch plan to
block jump. And then when I I showed
you this one, I said, what's the plan?
Where where's the evidence?
Led by corrupt Democrat party ringleader, Jamie Raskin,
who's trying to fraudulently apply section 34. Okay.
What happened?
There was none there this was conversation.
What's the outcome? What's the action? All we
get is words and narrative. My point is,
here we are.
December 29th. So, again, same point, December 29th
or 26th. Excuse me. 29th,
748.
Warns of bird flu pandemic ahead of the
inauguration. So, again, we the same thing is
for so of last month, same idea.
This guy is a different COVID, though. This
is Burks saying this. So now we're trusting
Burks even though she was part of the
Warp Speed rollout administration.
Funny what you choose to ignore and what
you choose to trust based on what sells.
January 3, 2025.
K. So now we're getting real close.
And, clearly, my point was you can see
this transition between here
and here. He looks different for sure.
Now we're on January 3rd. Deep state to
launch a false flag during his inauguration.
K? I don't these don't seem to be
let's just consider the possibility it could happen.
They seem to be hype, hype, hype, hype.
And people if you read the comments, people
are terrified. People are talking about taking action
because they don't know what's gonna happen. That's
scary to me.
Learn how globalists create justification needed. Aim Homeland
Security. Guys, what he's talking about is the
government, both sides of it. Are we trying
to pretend that they haven't carried out false
flags on left and right administrations? By the
way, just your government.
They have.
January 6th,
we're not out of the woods yet.
Alex Jones raises alarm over false flags ahead
of Trump inauguration.
This is him quoting himself. The point is,
raised alarm based on what? How have you
continued this for months based on hype?
We're not out of the woods yet based
on what exactly?
January 7th,
communist Antifa forces plotting to launch a potential
violent uprising on or before the inauguration. After
now, it's getting more vague as we get
closer. Right? President Trump, according to informants inside
these groups. Yes. What happened? Was there even
an event that was thwarted, or did we
really absolutely see nothing?
January 13th.
The deep state is getting us warmed up
for January 20th inauguration.
So you see, these aren't like, let's be
careful and watch out. These are they're doing
this because it's coming.
Am I missing something?
FBI warns of ISIS style attacks. Oh, so
now the point is they realize here's what's
crazy. This is the FBI of Biden's administration.
Right? They are telling you
Al Qaeda, so otherwise US Israeli proxy army,
are going to carry out false flags inside
the country, and that was reported through Sean
Ryan's podcast, and he's going, it's coming.
Are we missing something, or is he just
blindly reporting government narratives? Isn't that the mainstream
media?
It is.
But it works because it sells. Right?
January 16th,
emergency Thursday eve evening edition. Funny how if
it's every time that it's emergency, then it's
really not an emergency.
Will the desperate globalist deep state launch a
false flag terror attack on inauguration? Wait a
minute. You've been telling us they're going to
for the last 5 months. Now it's a
question?
Now let's be clear. In this conversation, if
you watch these shows, it's not just work.
It's coming. It's coming. He I'll show you
as we get through it to be objective
about it that he does walk over it
like he does all the time.
Talking about Trump and saying, no. He may
be the the the antichrist, but and it
goes on to praise him for the entire
show. Well, that makes it look as if
he somewhat questions it. His actions don't matter,
and that does not seem to be the
case.
January 16th, Alex Jones responds to reports that
Trump's inauguration
may be hit by deep state terrorists. What
do you mean response to reports? The reports
are coming from you, and then you're bolstering
it with people that tell you what they
wanna hear.
January 17th.
He says, get ready. This is when pastor
Biggs comes in. Remember, this was the craziest
part. The guy they say predict or, you
know, predicted the shot to the ear and,
you know, yeah. There was it was interesting.
Right?
Also, could just be a coincidence. Certainly possible.
I don't know. The point is that you
come up and tell us that the prophecy,
god told you, the inauguration was gonna be
attacked and there's gonna be all these fatalities.
It was crazy.
And, of course, this is where they say,
nuclear nuclear terrorism alert. I think that's yeah.
See, this is the one.
Federal helicopters are searching for radio, material. Well,
as I as I've showed you, this is
not the first time we've talked about this.
The reality is they do it every time.
So when they're searching now,
just like in the Super Bowl or any
other time, there's no reason to jump up
and make it about what you want it
to be. But to the point is he
tags that and says, who predicted him getting
shot? Alex Jones warns of state sponsored attacks
on Trump properties involving massive dump trucks.
Okay. What happened?
Funny how many times you could predict these
bombastic claims when it doesn't really happen.
Same thing. This is the main one. In
warns of impending mass terrorism targeting at least
10 cities, Trump inauguration.
Yeah. I mean, we shouldn't ignore anything like
that. I would never ignore something like that.
You consider it. But the hype that you
put around this, it scared
people, especially
god, people that believe in god.
On the edge of an which myself included,
my point is the people that then listen
to you believing you somehow know what they
might be doing. This one is what's interesting.
On the 19th, so the day before, on
the edge of the inauguration
prophecy
and the fact that we're even talking about
prophecies, how weird that is coming off the
Zionist prophetic push, let's not miss these overlaps
and wonder why he never calls out the
globalist
action,
the real real the the actual globalism we
can see and the Zionist Israeli. I mean,
it's incredible.
Calling out these things and ignoring the North
American Union. Calling these things out and ignoring
Israel and their central role in the technocratic
globalist rollout that he screams about. The globalist.
The globalist. Except we're not talking about the
obvious clear plan.
In this case,
the prophecy. In an unprecedented security meltdown, police
departments across the DC are staging what amounts
to be mass exodus from inauguration securities leaving
the capital exposed, and nothing happened.
So go I I I challenge you to
read into each of these, and you'll find
out that they are not what they appear
to be. That's all hype.
Oh, and don't forget James Woods stepped in
and said, is anybody else besides me gravely
concerned for Trump's safety? Based on what, bud?
A bunch of hype? Now look. Any one
of these times, there's something people wanna kill
presidents. That happens in past. We've seen it.
People go crazy. Usually, because of political nonsense
like you guys. But it's certainly possible. So
I would never go it's they're I mean,
they're always at risk because they're a public
figure.
But this kind of hype was just about
building the tension before
Alex Jones says on 16th,
the public's fear that Trump's inauguration will be
hit by deep state terrorists, he responds to
their fear.
You mean the fear that you've been pumping?
And now as we get closer to 20th,
you wanna start stepping back and going, don't
get too worried about it. It's all just
reports that you've been screaming down their throats
for 4 months straight because it's gonna happen
for sure, but now let's let's address your
fears. I wonder where they came from.
And then, of course, he goes on the
back of that,
I do not believe the deep state's going
to attack Trump's inauguration, Monday.
Think about saying that after
4 months of nonstop constant screaming about and
more than that, actually, from July.
I just think that's absurd.
And then, of course,
breaking news on 20th. Biden says welcome home
to president Trump and Melania as they enter
the White House. Whoo. Talk about an underwhelming
result.
Welcome
home, team 8.
I mean, how do you even pretend that
that lines up with anything we're talking about?
Now it's not just this one moment. Of
course, you could just say that. Look at
the reality.
They've worked together with the deal on Ukraine.
They drive together. They were at the same
events. These people are not adversaries,
but they'll keep pushing that line because damn
it if it doesn't work for them.
I just think that's absurd.
Like, laugh out loud. Nobody should ever listen
to these people again. Absurd.
Of course, we also have the January 6th
overlap to this where he's saying, shocking. January
6th development. Like, let's go let's shift attention.
Let's not let anybody focus on the fact
that I've been telling you the world's gonna
end for but now we didn't. Okay. So
January 6th. And this isn't something we should
be ignoring. Right? I genuinely think this is
a a an act of a petty
political driven action
unless there's more we haven't seen in regard
to how late well, here's the point. It
says DC prison guards suspend the release of
the pardons. Make no guarantees of morning release.
Exactly not true. Because if you watch even
this video or actually look at what they
were saying in longer videos, these people are
simply saying, but in this video,
he says,
we're done for the night.
We'll really we'll cut check back tomorrow.
Right? And this one, he says anything, you
know, anything happened tomorrow, I think. But if
you listen to the rest of them or
all the reports, the reality seems to be
that they're going to release them tomorrow. That
they're it's the end of the day,
and there are processing that have to happen,
and they wait till tomorrow. My point my
my my feeling, of course, they could've probably
got this done today if they wanted to.
They're just trying to make a point because
they're petty, immature people, like, pretty much everybody
in political partisan games for the most part.
So
they're gonna drag their feet and do it
tomorrow. Now if tomorrow they don't get released,
well, there's where you'd make a much bigger
point to say, okay. Now they're just holding
them for no reason. This idea that I
see them talking about
suspending the release, that's the way they're framing
it from so far that I can tell
that's about trying to get you to think
they're not going to let him go. Trump
did it, and now they won't let it.
It falls perfectly
into the divide and conquer left right paradigm.
So
it could be, and we'll have to wait
and see. And I would never not report
that if we see that actually come to
pass. But as of right now, they're claiming
tomorrow the rest will be released. And if
you actually look into this I actually thought
I had that video right there.
It's it's in it's very quick, and he
simply says, tomorrow.
Hey, I'm not supposed to grab it since
I'm talking about it.
So the point though
is on top of that,
here we go. I'll just play it for
you first. I got it real quick.
Here it is.
I'm giving you literally all I got. Okay.
I just
but
no more are gonna be released tonight. Okay?
And
tomorrow Tonight. Brand new day. We'll see what
tomorrow brings. K? I'll probably be here with
you.
Okay? So right there, there they you can
hear that however you want and argue that
means it might not happen tomorrow. That's fair.
But that's the the context of what he's
saying is that it'll continue tomorrow. I mean,
I don't I don't see any reason why
we would think opposite other than political hype.
So yet again, I certainly could be wrong.
And if tomorrow comes and the rest of
them get released,
all the people screaming that they suspended the
releases, are you gonna call them out? I
hope so.
Now, Michael? It's a violation.
You don't release them on the receipt. The
law. Right? Come here. No. I was told
no more tonight. Gone by midnight. No more
tonight. Tonight. No more tonight. Illegal. K? We
trust you. And and tomorrow, I don't know.
Okay. K?
That that's the best I got for you.
Alright. I I I understand your concerns. That's
fair. But he's just a guy, a police
officer being given limited information. Has anybody actually
this is my point. If you read into
this, and, yes, Jess reports. That's why I'm
saying let's wait and see what happens tomorrow.
The reality is that they're claiming this will
continue tomorrow, and there's no reason to think
otherwise.
It may and look. I'll I'll show you
the tweet in a second. The point is,
guys, we have to realize there is a
process to this. I get it. Apart the
claim is that Trump did it, and therefore,
you're supposed to stand up and get me
guys. They have to go through the legal
processes
of checking them out of the facility, giving
them back what they had when they went
in. It's same we all know this, and
there's a lot of them.
I'm not saying I still argue it probably
could have been done and should have been
done tonight. I probably could have done it
quickly. They probably could have brought in more
people because it is a big deal.
My point is they probably didn't want that
to happen. But this is how this works,
guys. And now you've got people driving this
massive story around something that probably will resolve
itself tomorrow. At the very best though, they
still don't know for sure that what they're
saying is accurate. Many of them are deliberately
misinforming you about this story so far. Do
you want me to take a message on
purpose? Nope.
I'm sure they're fine. We just want me
that you read them after
after we left.
No. No. No. No. No? The managers assure
you're no more being released tonight. Oh, good.
Okay? Don't be worried about the cold. We
think I I understand.
I I comfortable. I very much understand. Okay.
Tell your boss. You're soon to be married.
K. Is that Okay. Thank you. Alright. I
get it. And tell him not to pet
or spray him and bring him up to
me.
Okay. I'll be back.
Breaking news.
So
lot of hype. So this one says, this
metro Metropolitan police officer laughed when I told
the US marshals we're called.
She said I don't care. Now, of course,
I I do sense there's a level of
this that's sort of like they are enjoying
from a political side. I'm talking about the
individuals because this is what partisan politics does
to in normal people.
That this is something they would allow happen
because they're just mad because Trump's in power
or whatever. That does exist.
The point is that under the legal reality,
I don't believe that they're under any any
immediate rush to make this they have to
go through their processes just like we see
left and right do all the time. And,
yeah, the bureaucracy intentionally drags out on purpose
because they're petty.
Still, that is not the point is you're
gonna call the marshals for what? It seems
like a silly thing to do. They're just
trying to the the a lot of these
partisans feel like this
is a new world. Like, suddenly now we're
in power, so your guys are just stopping
our power. It's people that aren't really educated
about the dynamics. That's what I would argue.
Or people manipulating those people.
But this person says, rightly so, just because
a pardon or a commuting sentence was issued
doesn't mean they just walk out of the
cell. They have to be processed and discharged.
That is a reality, guys. Now somebody below
is like, that's not true. It's as if
the charge never happened. Okay. Fine. They still
have to go through the process of leaving
the location.
It's a basic it's because the point is
they're accountable
until they're not.
This is so basic. And I just don't
understand why this has become such a large
thing until we know for sure.
So what's on top of that, what we're
noticing is people doing this,
which is what I come to expect in
this partisan game. Shouldn't be too hard to
find her.
Oh, great. So now we're tracking down police
officers because you feel some grievance?
Okay. Here's her name and her badge number.
Okay. So what happens if something bad happens?
What happens if somebody finds out who she
is and goes and does something? You see
how and I I doubt it this will
happen in this context, but who knows?
This is what the kind of partisan stuff
does. This one says multiple wardens refusing to
release January 6 prisoners that were pardoned by
Trump hours ago.
Hitler for prison says. That's the account.
I was just hung up on by a
guard who told me, okay. First of all,
these are just tweets. In fact, they're screenshots
of tweets. So as always, we don't even
know if this person is accurate or if
the tweet's even real, but it is. The
point is maybe they were wrong. Maybe they're
bombast the point is we don't really have
all the information. We're basing this off a
narrative that's being floated through people that are
constantly miss
misleading you. And it says, we have contacted
the US marshals and told them that 14
DC prison guards are illegally holding you see
where this is going?
This is all about trying to get this
hype going. Now my point is right now,
based on the legal understanding that I can
see, you can easily understand a scenario where
they argue, look. Because this is processing will
take into tomorrow, so we'll release the rest
of them tomorrow. I
anybody who's not gonna be driven by a
partisan man game is gonna understand that that
would make sense, even if they're playing the
dynamic to manipulate you. So when we see
this go through tomorrow and we don't see
them immediately start coming out in the morning,
I'll be the first one to talk about
that. But I think it's very important to
see how much of this is being driven
by the kind of bombastic nonsense we get
from people like this.
That's super concerning to me, especially since I
just showed you a long string of nonstop
hype that turned out to be nothing that
very well could've led to something.
Truthfully, guys,
this, what he just did there, that could've
led to the exact thing that they told
you was gonna happen. Literally, he could've made
his own prophecy come true by doing that,
And then what would then what would have
happened? I just thought that was super important.
As always, people seem to be going out
like that I'm still picking on him. I
said this this morning.
It's objectively clear that he's been deceiving people.
I don't think that's picking on anybody. I
think it's important to recognize
who these people are and what they're continually
doing.
And the track record matters. In the same
way, as we get into the ceasefire today,
I think it's important to recognize when somebody
in the media, independent or otherwise, is consistently
accurate on certain, you know, not every single
time, but consistently ahead of a story. Consistently
goes, hey. I'm pretty sure they're gonna violate
the scene. And it's not just he left.
There's a lot of people doing it. But
most people in that vein, not part of
the left right paradigm, seem to not really
gain from that kind of work. And what
happens is people seem to be gaining from
the ones that clearly end up being false.
Now, what that shows you is a controlled
media sphere. And that very well may be,
like a world dynamic, guys. We have to
start thinking about that as we're rushed into
this technocratic future.
So on that note, let's get into where
I was about to start, but I do
think that was important.
Oh, I make sure I close the wrong
window here.
There we go. So we're gonna start with
here. I wanna play for you a clip
from Carrie Wedler. I always appreciate her work.
And this is about basically,
as she just wrote, it's a new day
in America, same as the old day.
An inaugural PS, they remind you that the
system, deep state cabal, whatever you wanna call
it, will never let anyone who truly poses
a threat to the machine attain real power
in said machine. Anyone who rises to the
top of this system is not a challenge
to it, especially not someone who repeatedly empowers
lobbyists for corporatists, bootlickers for foreign governments, neo
cons, and Wall Street moguls. Someone now cozying
up to big tech oligarchs even more than
he already had with his deep state Palantir
Peter Thiel connections, who wants the CIA more
involved, wants to add more government that will
further impoverish you, has called for an expansion
of the biometric police state and wants immunity
for state enforcers, proudly shield for one of
the most corrupt and most powerful companies on
Earth, and wants to keep the military industrial
swamp alive by endlessly arming one of their
most warmongering customers. The true power of Donald
Trump's inauguration is that many of the people
who've been raging against tyranny and this abuse
of system for years are now being lulled
back to sleep. They'll now excuse rampant authoritarianism
they'd otherwise condemn from a democrat because they
think they have their team in power now,
even though that team is steeped in the
swamp and everything they've claimed to oppose. PS,
waiting on daddy Trump and his regime to
save you is entirely contrary to the anti
government, pro freedom ideology you think you espouse.
It's also a major reason why things have
gotten so bad as you outsource your power
to authoritarians.
It's beta simping boot licking identifying as alpha
anti government.
Fantastic.
Of course, you know, the problem is that
people who need to hear that usually get
pushed away because it makes them feel stupid.
That's not her fault. The reality is that's
100% accurate. Now here's her video she includes
down here for for the what's their solution
commentors.
The point is her,
Derek, myself, plenty of us are routinely discussing
that path. The point is every time you
highlight a problem, the answer shouldn't be, what
do you think?
Acknowledge the problem first. This prob this becomes
an issue with partisans because it says if
you don't present the easy solution for them
to divert into, which we usually don't even
want to, then suddenly the problem doesn't exist
anymore. No. The problem is still there. You
just ignored it because we didn't highlight for
you. That's the in the what I'm trying
to get at is that she does often
prevent the solu or present the solutions
for these problems.
Now as Brad Miller says on 20th, we're
in the midst of a master class
on societal deception,
propaganda,
and psychological manipulation.
You know I agree with that. I just
think it's worth setting that tone for how
all encompassing this really is, and he definitely
sees it. We've talked about the 2 party
illusion. I mean, it's it's important to see
there's a lot of people that are seeing
through this and I wanna set I do
and I I know I've said a lot,
but I'm very I am convinced just like
with COVID or even the Israel topic that
this is not a partisan game anymore. A
lot I mean, there's always slants. But I'll
I think more people than I've ever noticed
in my entire career are absolutely seeing a
lot of the things that they've never even
been willing to question before.
That that's nothing if not inspiring.
I mean, it's that that's again, it's the
whole situation where every time we get more
awareness, then our lives are made more and
more and more complicated, more and more uncomfortable.
That that's so we fall back into place,
guys. So it's the whole darkness before the
dawn dynamic. I believe that we're getting closer
and that's why it's becoming more uncomfortable.
That's my opinion anyway. So I'll include these
shows which we discussed this this is January
2nd, 5th generation warfare, drones, fog, false flags,
and political destabilization. I always wanna reference like
the words of the vase when I do
those. Drones, warfare, and fog. Oh, my. Oh,
my. What how does it go? Oh, it's,
you know, how'd that go?
Why is it tigers and bears? Oh, my.
I always make me think of that for
some reason, but no one no one gets
that anymore. It's like dating ourselves. But here's
the other one, and this is even before
it. We talked about this on August 4th.
US Israeli 5th generation warfare. Israeli bots, destabilizing
propaganda, and digital regime change.
Clearly, this has been building.
Now here we are. Right? It's, 21st.
So Ross is free. Right?
Isn't that what happened? That Ross Olbright got
got released? Well, unless it happened over the
process of the last so many hours, that
doesn't seem to have happened. Now my point
in the beginning, and same with Derek,
was that ultimately, okay,
it's hard to see that that would happen
in the 1st day or that even if
it did, like, with the January 6th thing,
that you would say that, well, it's gotta
take more than 24 hours to, like, get
this, you know okay. That's fair, but that's
not what was promised.
Repeatedly. Day 1. Day 1. His family he
that they got his family involved. His family
was supporting Donald Trump. Now they're probably pretty
worried, rightly so. Because it's not about politics.
They just want their son free. Frankly, I
would argue it's probably the opposite of the
politics. Either way,
Point is, it doesn't seem to have happened.
So if my let's just say he signed
an executive order that day and said, get
him out when you can. Well, I would
still go good. 1st day, he did it.
But guess what, guys? I don't think that
was ever the plan. And I think, like,
the co opting of Bitcoin or the using
of certain people like Ron Paul and Massie,
who now get kicked to the side. It's
all about trying to co opt you.
And there's plenty of you out there that
libertarians
who are chilling for the Trump administration right
now. And I don't know how you're doing
that. I'd be embarrassed. It's counterintuitive
to everything you believe you stand for.
But here we are. I hope it happens.
I just it's one of those moments where
we have to recognize it's a lot that
was promised that has not come to pass.
Now this one, same kind of thing. Alex
Jones' breaking news. Elon Musk promises to stabilize
American civilization so that we can stabilize the
future of humanity and the planet. My god.
What the hell does that even mean?
What a grandiose thing. We're gonna stabilize the
universe so we can all succeed forever into
the ground. Like, okay.
I mean, let's just try not to be
so bomb I mean, the point is, breaking
news. Politicians
say words.
Yeah. Well, they could be wrong. They could
be lying. They could wanna do it and
change their mind.
But here we are. We're that I mean,
there's been studies written about this over the
last so many years. Appear apparently, American politics
has devolved into whatever they say last.
Like, that that that that's what people in
the partisan field, I don't think that's the
majority, but people that pie into the partisan
game that if they say it, they go,
wow. We knew it.
No. I just think it's crazy. To stabilize
American civilization, what does that look like? What
if I disagree with what that means? You
know, it's it's just meaningless. These are just
big screaming words because that's all we care
about apparently in the partisan field.
I want action.
Also, last night, Trump pledged to release JFK,
RFK, MLK assassination files. Okay.
I'm tired of this game. Well, let's see
it then. Stop saying these things and do
it. You said JFK last time. You said
lock her up. You said end the Fed.
All these things didn't happen. Yeah. Some files
were released. But what did we all remember?
That it didn't change anything. I'm willing to
bet you it's the same damn thing this
time. I hope not.
But are we really confused? Do we still
I mean, are are we even can are
we pretending for a second that we don't
know the government and Israel were involved with
JFK? Do we not already know as a
matter of fact that the Martin Luther King
Junior was killed by the government? Guys, they
you know, court of law in the United
States, they ruled that that US government was
involved.
Most of you don't know that most likely
even though we reported it 50 times and
James Corbis sent a documentary about it because
it's just something we're not supposed to know.
But it's provable.
So this idea that we need him to
release the files, it's a game. And mostly
you and, usually, it doesn't even amount to
the reality. Are you are we really gonna
pretend that he's gonna release the information that
proves that Mossad and CIA were involved with
JFK's murder despite our JFK or,
RK Jr. Saying that
and now being seemingly pushed to the side
of this entire experience?
Yeah. Maha.
He's a he's being used as a token
so far. I hope I'm wrong.
It just kills me. This is how this
goes so far. Screening narratives,
hype for people that have hyped nothing but
nonsense, but here we are. We're all gonna
win. Unity.
Oh, unity. But you mean unity with the
bad guys? Well, how does that make sense?
Right? Aren't we just I mean, what's hilarious
to me, and this I was saying this
this morning, is we're saying, okay.
It's good because we're all coming together. Right?
It's okay. Well, you guys just spent the
last 4 years along with a lot of
us going Bill Gates,
Zuckerberg,
Bezos.
You know, these guys are the enemy. Right?
Like, they're the villains. Look at what they've
done. Their censorship has led to all sorts
of horrific things that right. We all agree
on that. But that's all okay because now
they're on our side.
Okay.
That sure lines up. Right? The bad guys
are with us now, so that means we're
winning. I just don't even get how people
are wildly uncomfortable by that. I know a
lot of you are. The truth is even
if they just change their minds,
which we all know really doesn't happen that
often if at all, they still are
accountable, aren't they?
Well, that would go for Trump too, by
the way, with the shot. No. Now we
know why we're doing it because none of
them are gonna be held accountable, and that
was the plan. That's what I think anyway.
Well, here's what Caitlin Johnson had to say,
and I think this is important. This is
kind of her it's it's a little bit
of a long read. It's not that long,
but it's, you know, she does she kinda
post these, which here's the link to the
actual episode or the,
audio version, which I find cool. I just
don't have time or the resources of the
person to do it for me, but I
love that because people like you could listen
to it like a podcast.
But here's what she had to say. The
title of it is
Donald Trump is the empire unmasked. Now she's
made this point before about the idea that
he really does kind of say the quiet
part out loud. We're there for the oil.
You know, that kind of thing. This is
different though. What he just said in his
opening discussion,
I mean, guys, it just lays it out
exactly. And it's it's all and what's this
is what's so funny about the way this
always works, whatever partisan side we're dealing with,
is that we they something happens, and we
go, oh, here it goes. That's what this
is gonna be. And it's gonna it's gonna
be like that. And they go, no. That's
not he's not like that. We're he's fighting
for this. And then all of a sudden,
he comes out and goes, I'm doing the
thing they just said.
And then they go, yeah. We told it's
good because he's gonna do it like this
and he's the right guy for the job.
The very people that just got done telling
you that he would never do it now
rationalize why it's the best thing for the
country. We all know that happens.
It's not and and that because it shows
you that that's not about information, truth, or
outcome. They just like being on the winning
side or are lying for fun. I mean,
who knows? You can put all sorts of
things in there. So now
hear this.
Hear all that we just talked about.
The colonial dynamic, the the expansionism,
the globalist dynamic. And that's not just ideology.
That's one part of it. It's also just
territory, one world government stuff. So the more
they expand and, guys, the North American Union
is one part of that larger plan and
now they're literally pointing to it just like
we said. And what they say about that,
that's a perfect example.
How many of them told us, oh, you're
just being trolled. Greenland and Panama, you guys
are so easy to manipulate. And now here
we are. And now those same people are
going, this is freedom, and we're gonna make
freedom cities.
It's worthy of ridicule, isn't it? Here's what
she says. During his inaugural address, the new
president of the United States was refreshingly open
about the fact that Washington is the hub
of a continuously expanding empire,
which is ruled by billionaire plutocrats.
And realize that's what Israel is doing too.
They're literally building out into Syria, Lebanon. They're
they're just built they're building a base in
Syria right now.
Despite the narrative about how the opposite would
be the shape, here we are. So it's
I I I I it behooves us to
see this as one entity for this conversation.
She continues as Joe Loria highlighted for
consortium news, which is right here, by the
way. The imperial presidency marches on as he
was sworn in for a second term, Donald
Trump openly declared America to be a territorial
empire that would expand even to Mars.
Terrifying.
Oh, that will be in the show notes.
Here's the actual show we talk about as
Israel's globalist ambitions become clear. Team sport Republicans
endorsed North American Union, many of which for
the ones spending half their careers telling you
this was coming and then ignore it when
it gets here, which needs to be seen
for what it is.
She continues
as he referenced president Trump's speech included references
to the manifest destiny of America, saying that
under his presidency, the US will consider itself
a nation that expands our territory.
We're supposed to pretend that this is we're
past that point. Right? Where colonialism,
the idea of conquering territory for expansion was
seen as the problem that it is.
What about the rights to people? What about
the government? What about they voted for? What
about this whole thing about you guys talking
about
national borders meaning something? Nationalism being important or
the idea that we're supposed to respect what
the peoples of countries want and free speech
and all these big words and then none
of it matters because we want that.
If you're still falling for this, you don't
care, or you don't want to see it,
or you are only in this to win.
It says he waxed fondly about the settler
colonialist past, which established the country at the
expense of the people who were already living
there, just like Israel,
and vowed to take control of the Panama
Canal.
1 of the executive orders, by the way,
he's already named it apparently the the Gulf
of America, which is you know, it's funny
to me because clearly,
because the US government can strong-arm everybody,
that'll probably be the case for maps going
around the world forward. But it really is
just a choice. I wonder if Mexico just
keeps calling it the Gulf of Mexico and
they make their own maps. You know, it's
like, it's just a game,
but it's meant to mean something when you
got the biggest military power who's going to
take what they want from you and step
on your neck while doing it. Saying that,
it shows you something.
But it says, Israeli,
or then it goes on to say hold
on. I went too far.
He goes the Trump gave this speech to
an audience where the wealthiest people on earth
sat alongside his own cabinet in the best
seats in the house. In fact, in front
of them, by the way, Elon Musk, Jeff
Bezos, mock zark Zuckerberg,
Google CEO Sundar Pichai,
what's it, Pichai,
were seen together in the crowd among the
more official members of the incoming administration.
They had better seats, guys. Mary Madelson,
who according to Donald Trump helped dictate US
policy toward Israel in his first term. And
now, as we're gonna make very clear,
was seen sitting among Joe Biden, Kamala Harris,
and the Clintons.
That's not by accident, guys. These are power
structures. They're showing you who's more influential.
It says there will be there will reportedly
be no fewer
than 13 billionaires.
So, yeah, so the reality is that we
live in an oligarchy. We have for a
long time. Now all you're seeing is the
most clear example of them at the forefront.
As I talked about this morning that Matt
Harris discussed, we are living in this transitional
period where the billionaire plutocratic class is coming
back out to rule, and I think they
always have been.
Whether, you know, the overlap I mean, you
can go back a long way with this.
From the kings and and amid the times
of, you know, bloodlines to where I think
we all that's as you listen to the
Ike's, for example, that never really went away.
It's a fair thing to think about. The
idea that we're talking about is this is
the same with the Klaus Schwab's and the
world like everybody else about setting you back
into this path. Now they're literally sitting front
and center.
Now it's fair to call this an oligarchy,
but to pretend that Biden's was not just
because they weren't standing next to him is
absurd. But that's how they play the game.
So now now you got republicans literally pretending
like they're fighting for independent freedom and fighting
for,
what, a a rebel fighting the deep state
while sitting with 13 of the richest people
in the world?
And then because Biden said it, therefore, that's
why it's not true. So you got republicans
ignoring the most obvious example we've ever seen
because Biden said. So the opposite is true.
Played like a fiddle. It says, if you
were to twist my arm and force me
to say something positive about Donald Trump, this
is the sort of thing I would point
to. He makes the US empire much more
transparent and unhidden.
He removes its masks, his mask and and
reveals the twist the twisted face beneath it.
The US isn't suddenly ruled by billionaires now
that Trump is president. It was always ruled
by billionaires. The US isn't suddenly an empire
bent on global domination now that Trump is
in power. That was already the case. But
you're not supposed to just come right out
and say that. Now what's important is people
love to pretend, you know, because she's a
Democrat, that she is you know, only hates
Trump, and you just deranged by Trump. Look
at what she's saying if you're not so
blinded by your own opinion.
They're all the same thing. She's not outraged
because Trump's in power. It's all and if
you look at her work, she's been saying
the same about Biden. Realize
where we are.
She goes, Trump comes right out and says
it. He says the quiet parts out loud.
He's the only president who'll stay who'll openly
boast that US troops are in Syria to
keep the oil or lament that they failed
to take the oil from Venezuela or just
come right out and tell everyone he's bought
known by Zionist oligarchs.
He put much he puts much less effort
into disguising the true nature of the US
empire than other presidents.
I think there's many reasons for that, but
I won't there's plenty of directions to go
in to be hypothetical anyway, but obvious overlaps
I think we've discussed in the past. And
he says that's the only reason various factions
of America's unofficial permanent government have had objections
to Trump's presidency over the years. That's her
opinion, but it's a fair point to make.
But the only reason they even push back
is because he's making it too uncomfortable for
all of them by just being too bombastic
about it, which, by the way, is a
very entertaining and interesting point
to overlap with the mafia, the the, you
know, what Whitney talks about and has written
about in her books. The blending,
the infiltration, or however you wanna look at
it. The the the fusing of the
the the,
you know, the US government with the mob
with the the mob, essentially.
And so what maybe the worst looking at
here is that what we've always discussed. I
remember Whitney and I have interviews about this
well before the books ever came out, like,
talking about this and it kind of was
blowing my mind. Like, going like, okay. This
makes sense. So now what we see is
the government
self enforcing, right, just like the mob did,
where you get a little bit too loud
and you get checked back into place. And
if you go too far, well, you get
taken out
because they're the same thing. The mob just
realized, hey. They got they they know what
they're doing. Right? They're better they're way far
ahead than we are. Let's just put on
suits,
and then we could do whatever we want.
Because you realize they're doing the same things,
guys. It's just about the way it's presented.
So what's interesting,
She could be right. And it says it's
not because he presents a threat to the
establishment or because he's trying to bring down
the deep state. It's because he's viewed as
a poor custodian of the empire.
He either doesn't understand or doesn't care about
the importance of keeping a polite face on
the imperial machine. Now the the way that
would make sense to me is that we're
talking about the potential Zionist influence, which we
can see how belligerent it is, and it's
clearly likes to make the US look stupid.
But that might be bumping up against some
of the other factions inside the United States
that are less interested with Israel's objectives, but
still blindly supportive, but ultimately don't like that
Trump's making their immediate objectives look crazy. And
so they poke them back into place. That
may be what we're seeing. You know, that
makes sense. It still could may not be
the case.
But it says, if I were forced to
say something about positive about Trump, she says,
that would be it. The thing some US
Empire managers dislike about him is the only
thing I like about him. And he makes
the US Empire a less effective evil because
of how much less hidden he keeps the
inner workings of the machine.
The hood stays pop propped up the entire
time, showing the whole world how the imperial
sausage gets made. You know, like, now saying
we're gonna conquer territory.
I think that's because it's what Israel wants.
He goes on to say that not that
there haven't been plenty of mask off moments
during the dementia muddled chaos of the Biden
administration as well. A new article in Time
titled why Biden's Ukraine win why Biden's Ukraine
win was a Zelensky loss. It's exactly what
you'd imagine. That's why I haven't really touched
on it. It's the idea that it's just
using Ukraine and, like, as a the meat
grinder as we've talked about. But it goes,
is a good example of this. The report
cites a former member of Biden's National Security
Council saying that victory for Ukraine was never
part of their plan. That's not unique to
one side or the other, guys.
It's I if we haven't seen by now
that they're gonna continue the same agendas, I'm
not sure what you're looking at.
The opening paragraph reads as follows from the
article from about, Ukraine. When Russia invaded Ukraine
nearly 3 years ago,
Biden set 3 objectives for US response.
Ukraine victory was never even among them.
Funny how clearly we say look. Same point
at the beginning. Isn't that exactly what we
told you?
Well, before we and this was just my
opinion based on what we could see. It
was all about miring Russia in the conflict,
which is probably all leading to what happened
in Syria.
None of that had to do with anything
other than their agenda at the expense of
both the Syrian people and the Ukraine people
while screaming about saving both.
That's the kind of evil we're dealing with
here.
Ukraine victory wasn't among them. The phrase the
White House used to describe its mission at
the time, supporting Ukraine for as long as
it takes, that was the quote, was intentionally
vague. It also raised the question, as long
as it takes to do what?
Ukraine's victory was never among them. Talk about
a mask off moment. It has long been
clear that the US pushed Ukraine into an
unwinnable war with the goal of bleeding and
preoccupying Moscow,
and that it actively sabotaged peace negotiations in
the early days of the war in order
to pursue these goals. Now I said that
a long time ago. I agree with her.
The point is because it's exactly what they
did using the mujahideen in Afghanistan with the
Soviet Union. It's the same dynamic, guys. They're
doing the same thing, and we can prove
that they've been using the alzab movement back
in in
the late forties until today. We've talked about
this many times. Funding from both sides, Israel
and the United States. It says now that
the job has been done and the demented
meat puppet is out of office, we are
finally hearing it from Biden's own handlers in
his admin in in his administration.
And, of course,
there was Gaza,
where the world spent 15 months watching history's
first livestream genocide right in front of their
faces while western officials made nonstop excuses of
less and less believability.
If there's to be any good that comes
out of the incomprehensibly
horrific nightmare, it's that it has shown everyone
the true face of the empire.
That is transparent. I mean, guys, that's the
world around. It was already there for most
of the world before this. But I think
right now, I mean, that that's just that's
done. So that's what's so interesting about how
this goes forward, which is probably why, you
know, Trump and the Zionist outcome and the
technocratic driver, you know, the it's funny how
they've been screaming about this maybe the last
one if they win.
I hope wrong, but it very well could
be the exact opposite. But it says the
more glimpses people get out of the true
face of the empire, the less effective the
imperial propaganda becomes because propaganda only works if
you believe it. Now, again, back to what
I just said. Do not hear that as
left versus right.
It's just because this is the easiest way
to play. Really, it's about the point that
she's making. It's the Zionist influence entity versus
the ones that may be more interested in
immediate American interest. None of which are for
you or anybody else. It's for their
oligarch direction or, you know, whatever technocratic agenda,
whatever you wanna think they're fighting for. That's
how I read it anyway.
The primary obstacle to revolutionary change under the
Western empire is the fact that its citizenry
have been successfully propagandized
into accepting the status quo. The more open
their eyes
to the fact that we are ruled by
psychopaths who are driving us to their our
own doom on multiple fronts, the closer we
get to a collective movement toward a healthy
world.
It's well said.
Now, the North American Union aspect of this
can't be ignored. It's very obvious what's happening.
And so as he's screaming about taking these
over,
even in the face of all the weird
discussion around it or his own people telling
you he was all jokes,
it just shows you there's somebody else driving
this bus, in my opinion.
Sam Parker points out, every 4 years on
inauguration day, we Americans get to celebrate the
peaceful transfer of power from Israel to Israel.
I find it interesting that we would even
have an Israeli flag hung at the inauguration.
Anybody have explained for me why that makes
sense?
Quite interesting.
There's other things down here. But, anyway, the
point is, guys, that you can clearly see
everybody there, everybody enjoying themselves. They're on the
same side. At but the main point for
me
is some of the interesting things that happened
there. The doctor, mister sausage, apparently,
whoever that account is, says,
why was Trump not sworn in with his
hands on a bible? Now this has become
a big story.
Right? Everyone's talking about it.
So this person says, Robert stated Robert started
the ceremony before Melania could get there.
Hand gesture on he basically says, you know,
why was a rabbi speaking? There seems to
be a rabbi and a priest to pretty
much all of these. Was why was Eric
Trump making blatant masonic hand gestures? That can
be your own interpretation. Shouldn't be ignored, but
it's up for you to decide.
Mark Zuckerberg is guilty of mass treason and
crimes against humanity. Why was he in the
front row? Well, that's what we already know
because they're on our side now. Those aren't
black pills. Those are legitimate questions. Is it
funny you have to say that? How is
it a black pill to point out something
that's objectively
that's how this game has gone. It's a
black pill to point out what you don't
wanna hear about Trump. No. That's you that
are what? I mean, what would you even
call that? What's that a white pill? No.
It's not. What's it actually called? So so
to be ignoring all the problems, make one
up for that. Anyway,
the point is the bible.
Well, I was like, okay. Wait a minute.
Like, that's wild. Like, if that didn't happen,
there is no excuse for that. I don't
care if you're on a timeline.
That's a huge deal, especially for a per
a somebody who professes to be a Christian,
secondarily, because that's the process. That's the that's
the ritual
that we're supposed to do in order to
guarantee that he's, you know, as we see
it, not lying.
Right?
I find that to be pretty crazy. Now,
a blue pill would be well, I shouldn't
go off. Sorry. Respond in the chat. It's
somebody like, my point was somebody who
sees these things and then chooses to pretend
like it's not happening. Let's make up a
a pill for that. But
she says, well, it's because they just wait.
Ceremony. She wasn't there. Trump said he was
bringing unity and has anti Zionist rabbi speak.
No. That's a weird thing to say. There's
a sign there's a rabbi at pretty much
I mean, as far as I can tell,
it's not it's not uncommon
to have other faiths there.
So it's that's
weird to respond that way. But now my
thing and this is he signed as EO
to restore free speech, which explains Zuckerberg and
Bezos, alliance,
cope.
You guys are so desperate. Oh, is that
what explains it? He's he signed. He said,
I I'd fight for free speech on a
piece of paper. That why that's why he's
working with the ones that have never respected
that. Yeah. Somebody needs to cope, clearly. How
sad that is. We'll go into the executive
order about free speech. It's this lazy argument
that
we're gonna now fight for free speech. It's
like saying we're gonna make the gut, the
universe, whatever he was saying in that tweet.
We'll come back to it. The bible.
New York Post. Trump did not place hand
on bible for oath of office during his
inauguration,
but his supporters defend president over rushed ceremony.
I mean, it to me, guys, that feels
a little bit important.
Apparently, they're reporting too that the guy who
did it misspoke one of the words. So
now they're going, does that mean maybe he's
not even president? Well, here's what's funny to
me.
I wouldn't go that far. I find it
to be a small d v I mean,
to me, it's it's it's kind of a
meaningless point. It's not an actual ritual. I
mean, even though if it kind of is,
it's not like if you say the word
wrong, it's not a magic spell as much
as people might even argue that. What's interesting
though, you know as well as I, if
you look at everything q has done for
so long,
they would lose their minds
over that. If this was Biden or Kamala,
they would claim for 4 years that this
is how they know they're not president. That's
why Trump is still actually in power. That's
the kind of dumb things he would see
from that. So now that it's happening on
the other side, it's hilarious to me that
it's like, no big deal. You guys are
all conspiracy theorists. The people that you it's
funny. But what's interesting to me is the
bible.
So you can see very clearly. Now what
I find interesting is I right here, you
can see these I think that's those books
right there. I don't know if you can
zoom I don't know if you see I
zoom in or not.
That looks like the bibles.
So the argument was, Melania wasn't there.
I just don't even understand this. So the
bottom line is what you can see, this
guy, he's on the other side. He raised
his hand. This guy's over here reading it.
Why wouldn't they all go, hold on. Wait.
Wait. Wait. Where's the bible? Get me a
bible. That I mean, you really think that
Trump would not he could just tell them
do it. I have, for some reason, find
this to be weirdly important.
You guys can decide. Maybe it's maybe it
is just a mistake.
But it seems pretty damn weird to me.
Trump did not place his hands on a
stack of 2 bibles
held by Melania as he was sworn in.
So that appears to be those right there.
I I mean, I think maybe she's just,
like, blocked by him. Oh, yeah. That is
I think that's the hat right there.
So look at that, guys. They're literally right
next to him.
Why would he not do that?
Of course, they would jump to defend that
because they would freak out if it was
anybody else. If it was Biden, they would
call him a satanist or whatever. But think
about the weirdness of this with what's going
on in the world today.
I find that to be pretty alarming. I
don't know why. It just stands out to
me. I mean, I do know why, but
it just it seems like a smaller point
that I wouldn't usually fixate on.
But I'll I'll show you what I what
I mean.
Yeah. So arguing, he was rushed. Well, okay.
So it's not just Trump there. What about
everybody else? What about the people that are
supposed to be managing the process? What about
the I mean, it just seems like a
choice.
Instead of the bible, he stood with his
left arm and his and his hand raised
like you can see.
People were quick to question it. There might
be a sign that Trump's departure from presidential
norms, but others noted the entire ceremony appeared
to be appeared to be rushed. Okay.
Yeah. That's that that's that's that's weird. That's
that's Melania right there. Look at how close
look at that, guys.
How are you gonna pretend
that he was rushed? His hand's right there.
That is not an act. That's a choice
to not do that.
Prove me wrong.
You tell me how in the world
it's not it's rushed when he all he
had to do was lift his hand up.
Very, very, very, very, very weird to me.
Now, again
well, I shouldn't say again, but the what
I've been saying generally
and what what I guess now I'm kinda
getting ahead of my mind about the whole
gesture from Elon Musk. I'm starting to get
the sense that we're much, much deeper in
this 5th generation warfare thing than we think.
Like, right now, this very well could be
done in order to do this. This could
be part of the same thing distracting us
for everything else going on. Lucky for you,
I've got plenty of time to get into
the Israel genocide we're gonna talk about later
after the show. But my point would be,
that this would ultimately be what to get
you to talk about meaningless things.
But maybe not though. I would not dismiss
this as something that might me have more
meaning.
So we just talked about this, and this
is just one of the things my mind
went to because
it's still there. Now what did I say?
They just got inaugurated,
and there are people in Trump's administration
that have not signed their ethics pledges. So
if we're gonna go going back to the
Alex Jones point, are you gonna tell me
the democrats are trying to coup the whole
thing and get wait. They don't point out
one of the most easy things to go
after. These people have not even actually signed
their ethics pledges. Now realize it's just the
inauguration. We're not past the point of all
the confirmations.
But Trump hasn't
either. We just went over this, guys. We
went over this in-depth in multiple shows. He
has not signed this. There's very clear problems
with that. There's very clear issues
with what he might be compromised for, including
the obvious that even the guy pointed out
in the beginning, he may be funded directly
from a foreign government. You're damn right.
Maybe.
Guys, we don't need to debate this.
This is Howrettes. Trump is desperate for Mary
Madison's cash. Her condition, West Bank annexation, which
is now beginning.
Already has been going, but now it's getting
it's we're gonna get to it. So what
I'm trying to highlight here is with him
not putting his hand on the bible. Right?
With him not signing these pledges, I'm starting
to wonder if there's a common thread here.
And I'm pretty worried about where this actually
goes
because there's a lot around this that could
be very concerning.
But again, we'll have to wait and see
what goes forward. But I think the Bible
thing should not be dismissed. Here's the article
we went over, breach of protocol. Senator still
don't have their filings, and this includes Trump.
We went over this in the last show
very clearly.
At the same time, Mary Madison
sitting in a higher position than some other
people that are far more
US centric,
right behind Hillary Clinton and the Clintons.
That's important.
She is literally giving him 1,000,000 or 100
of 1,000,000
so she the Israeli government can do something
illegal.
That's as simple as it gets. There is
no other way to read this. West Bank
annexation
is illegal.
There's no no nuance to this game they
try to play because it's very, very, very
clear, and they pretended like it was not
God. Now they're just going after it anyway.
Remember what Jordan said that this would be
a red line? Where you at, Jordan? Yeah.
A lot of them are falling flat. A
lot of them are showing that they never
really cared about a lot of this, sadly
enough.
I'll include this, by the way, just so
you can see all the many times. Like,
just like we were showing at the inauguration,
let's not forget that the entire time, as
far as I could see, that Trump was
on the campaign trail, he was standing with
Israeli flags.
Or at least, I mean, as far as
I could tell, maybe there's I mean, let's
put it this way. I'm sure there might
be examples you could find with not. But
in my experience I mean, look, guys. Every
one of these, you can find Israeli flags,
and these are all different events.
Maybe save for this one, which was a
specific event.
Oh, but he's speaking in regard to the
Jewish Coalition. So the point is, guys,
any of these. Why he would be on
a campaign trail, Trump fans right on the
podium, and be surrounded with equal amounts of
Israeli flags and American flags. And then having
Miriam Adelson introduce him at these events, more
than one, and say that he gave us
this and he gave us that. It says
a lot. Or the idea that he literally
this is about as crazy as pretending he
does not still support the shot even though
we know he does.
Openly on a show says Israel used to
control congress,
rightly so.
Watch it all for yourself. Every one of
the examples or deporting Americans because they say
they hate Jews, or that you say they
do because they have a Palestinian flag. Either
way,
wildly
unconstitutional. He doesn't care.
Now TikTok has an interesting overlap to this
story. Right? Because
TikTok,
well, it's not mince words here,
was
censored to a degree because Israel wanted that.
They've all admitted this.
Now I think what we're seeing with the
Trump in part of this is part of
this game.
I mean, as I said, I should've just
started with that. I it feels very contrived
if you want my honest opinion.
I guess old I guess we'll end with
that.
The point is I pre this feels like
there's much more going on here possibly coordinating
between governments.
Like, if we're really gonna start talking about
the globalist agenda,
like, what do we see during COVID 19?
They all seem to basically work together with
these agendas despite some of the narratives in
Trump screaming about China, but they all seem
to go in the exact same direction, and
they all follow the same even during Trump's
administration.
So what I'm worried about here is that
this is all a play towards this larger
control. And we know that I mean, look.
The game was TikTok was
they wanna control it. That's all it is.
They don't care about anything other than them
having these tools
and using them against you. The game it's
like the idea that it's a CCP. Well,
okay. If that's the reality,
as we go through this, you ask yourself
how this makes sense. But on top of
that,
are we not aware of how our government
does this to us on a daily basis?
To know how this ends up, it appears,
well, to see how it fully finishes in
regard to whether Musk buys it or something
else, which I'm worried about, is it does
appear to be the consolidation of more and
more of exactly what we're talking about.
And you got all the classic speaking up
like Tom Cotton,
saying any company that posts, distributes services, or
otherwise facilitates
communist controlled TikTok, which that is his statement.
You could argue that and I wouldn't dismiss
it just as much as the US government
completely influences, if not controls Twitter, for example,
or any other platforms with a literal military
contractor who's currently part of the government running
that platform with a World Economic Forum leader
and the ADL, because that's not totally weird
and ridiculous. But that's all good because they're
fighting for your freedom and free speech. Right,
guys?
So dumb that I ain't gonna say that
out loud. The point though is that that's
his opinion
and it's just it's debatable. It's a little
bite dance versus the Singapore. There's there's arguments
to be made. I get it.
I just don't think it's as simple as
just going China, this and that. It's the
same day thing they do it both ways.
But it says could face 100 of 1,000,000,000
of dollars of ruinous liability under the law,
Not just from DOJ, but under security laws,
shareholder lawsuits and AGs. Think about it. So
what he's just trying to say is that
this can't be allowed to continue.
Now, Trump steps in
it says, in August on 19th,
in agreement with our service providers, TikTok is
in the process of restoring service.
We thank president Trump for providing the necessary
clarity and assurance to our service providers that
we will not face penalties providing TikTok over
under 7,000,000 users, American users, and 7,000,000 small
businesses. It's and now this isn't the full
picture, by the way. So that's why I'm
very weirded out by the way that they
posted this
because it's not done.
It's a it's a pause. And I'll show
you what I mean. It's a strong stand
for the first amendment. Well, not yet. It
is a extension.
If this ultimately happens, then sure. Yes. I
would agree with that. But this is my
problem with how these things work. It feels
very contrived right now. Let me show you
what I mean.
Well, oh, first, I forgot. I did a
little out of order. Hold on. Where was
I on this?
Right there. Let's do that first.
So here,
of course, Jones has Trump says, as of
today, TikTok is back.
Well,
that's not the full picture. Typical.
Half truth, maybe, kind of lie. The point
is, no, he signs an executive order, which,
again, I don't even understand how these things
we pretend
translate into global or national anything.
Because, well, all they're doing is normalizing you
with dictatorship,
which is pretty much what we already live
under under the guise of whatever else. Oligarchy
overlap, technocracy. But Trump says or Trump signs
executive order to suspend TikTok ban for 75
days
to find US buyer.
Isn't the entire point that TikTok just said
we will not sell the United States? That
they would they were willing to turn off
service because they weren't gonna do that? Like,
you can and, of course, the narrative is
they're so dependent on the CCP that they
can't you know, they'll shut down their entire
market. Maybe.
I wouldn't dismiss that or they're just not
willing to be bullied and strong armed by
an authoritarian government that wants to force the
sale of something they desire from somebody who
doesn't wanna sell it. That's not freedom. That
that's not even set that's not even free
speech. You're simply taking it into your stockpile
of tools to use against us.
But how are we framing this as anything
other than he just paused it to see
the same outcome that they just turned
off to avoid?
Now, yes, I've like I just said, it
could end up being after those 75 days
that something else happens.
But isn't this a little bit dishonest even
from TikTok?
President Donald Trump signed saying, where was it?
TikTok's China based parent bite dance. That's the
that's the connection. The argument that their Chinese
CCP is not hard to understand, but it's
not something I think is as demonstrated as
they pretend it is, was supposed to find
US buyer or be banned by 19th. Right?
Trump's order could give them more time.
Well, that's not what they said though. They
said that they weren't going to do that.
I think that's interesting. So what I'm feeling
from this guys is that this is a
game.
This is about giving this is about turning
it off for half second so people a
170,000,000
Americans, who by the way are very much
exposed to the ongoing genocide,
suddenly go thank you, Trump, for turning this
back on. Trump see, Trump knows. Trump's fighting
is real secretly. Trump actually fights for free
speech because he turned back on the app
that was only a see what I'm saying?
Now, yes, it's back on.
That's something you could praise Trump for. The
heat but if it's a 70, 75 day
pause before he goes back to the same
problem, then he really didn't do anything other
than gain for himself or the same agenda,
but gave you 75 more days to continue.
So, yeah, sure. You could thank him for
that.
See, this is my problem when you get
into this meeting was, oh, you just never
wanna give him credit.
If he if he did this and he
came out and said, you're back. You can
exist. We're done. I would say, credit. Trump
did it. Thank you, Trump. But it's not
what's happening. The fact that I have to
constantly point out that it's not the full
picture, that's what they don't like.
So I find that telling. Now the bigger
picture again becomes that I see coordination here.
The TikTok,
whatever that really represents,
an algorithm that's spying on people and manipulating
things. That's just it's Twitter. It's another version
of these things.
I think the point was more about this
merging into 1, you know, Goliath of of
surveillance or whatever we're talking about.
And you in using this momentary turn off,
they gained from turning it back on. And
now they'll sell it to something like, I
don't know, an Elon Musk character,
and that and force that somehow. Or maybe
the point is that Twit TikTok was always
planning to do that, and they only played
this game to give Trump a small win.
Like, you have to realize it's easy to
do this stuff. And then what happens when
they buy it right back in? It stays
on, so they'll be thinking, yay. But, of
course, then he'll
do the same things he's doing there. The
same ADL, where in the economic forum, censoring
Israeli con negative Israeli content.
We'll wait and see. I'm not gonna get
ahead. We don't know. But what I'm saying
is what with with Jones and the rest
are reporting,
that's not what just happened.
Typical. Right? It's just it's I mean, it's
transparent. Now this is also funny to me.
Somebody sent me this meme.
2020, Trump saying ban TikTok.
Like, most of them. Right? 2025, I saved
TikTok. Well, what happened every time? Well, the
people said, yeah. I've been in it. Now
they said, yeah. He saved it. You know,
it's not everybody, obviously, but my point is
there's a constant grouping that just goes along
to get along.
Now, of course, we see the typicals out
there, which is funny to me, that are
just against it.
And I think it's quite obvious why. And
I don't think we need to mince words
here because it's pretty clear that they've already
admitted even from ADL that this is why
this needs to go away.
Charlie Kirk saying, Trump is saving TikTok.
But, again, this is my point. These grifters
can they just don't know anything other than
the grift.
I'm asking companies not to let TikTok stay
dark. I will issue an executive order on
Monday. Okay.
Didn't happen. So now you got Charlie Kirk
hyping words before it happens. Right? And the
narrative being he's bringing it back. Well, no.
He's 75 days, and he's gonna force him
to sell still. So all he did was
give him a 75 day extension for the
same exact outcome. Now if it's a different
outcome,
then all we can conclude is that they
were always going to, mostly it's possible anyway,
that they were always gonna sell. Because why
would they go dark to avoid selling to
a US entity if then they were just
gonna fold in 75 days when Trump did
it? At the very least, you have to
acknowledge that doesn't really add up.
But Tim says, I oppose this.
Okay.
Very, very brave, Tim. And Tim, of course,
Patrick Henningsen says, why are these clowns so
adamant about shutting down TikTok?
This is
this totally fake impromptu video
of of, little Ben Shapiro with little Tim
Pool going, oh, we we want this to
stop because bad CP you know, China influence.
They just these again, seem like Alex Jones.
Because if you're simply parroting the mainstream narrative
with a not even a very not even
a difference at all, then you're the mainstream
media.
They're really overdoing it. It's almost like he's
showing for some for US or some other
government.
Gotcha, Patrick. He he sees it. Right?
So oh, by the way, I couldn't check.
I'm I'm gonna throw this out there just
because I wanna see what you guys think
if you have more insight. Because sometimes these
things do trickle out and it it's like
almost intentionally impossible to find until it needs
to you know, they want it to be
seen the way that these
platforms are controlled information.
But I wasn't able to find this anywhere.
Paulie Paulie is saying, Mark Andrstein buying TikTok?
Now I wasn't able to find it anywhere,
but that does seem to be something circulating
in the conversation. So it's worth noting on,
but I don't think there's any evidence to
back it up unless I missed some of
the stories out there or whatever it's coming
from. Maybe it's like some insider Trump guy
saying that. It hasn't really populated the news
yet. Not sure. But remember, Mark Anderson, guys,
these are the people that are in or
they're immersed in this technocratic drive right now,
and they're literally
consolidating all these things we're talking about.
You can't see the globalist technocratic overlap to
all that's happening
even if this isn't happening with in regard
to Anderson and TikTok.
Again, I just feel like you it's it's
objectively clear what they're doing. Now you could
argue they're doing it for good reason
to roll out the same thing, but to
help you, that I would I would disagree,
but at least I we're on the same
page in regard to what's happening. But I
see so many people that are choosing just
to ignore
all the very same things that they were
calling out in any other context.
James Lee says, can any of the democrat
well, first of all, Harry Sissons says, on
August 6, 2020, Donald Trump signed an executive
order to ban TikTok.
He started this. We would not be here
if Trump hadn't tried to ban it first.
Okay. So doesn't that seem to kinda be
a full circle agenda
to where he's benefited from his own psychological
operation or however you wanna look at that?
Seems pretty interestingly possible.
James Lee says, can any of the Democratic
operatives honestly say that if Kamala Harris had
won, that she wouldn't be upholding the ban?
Well, I disagree flatly. I like Lee's work.
But I think my point is, obviously,
Biden and Kamala were aggressively pro Israel.
Other than a few examples of words, they
did every single thing they could to support
the genocide.
So if we can see clearly, which I
think we can, this is what Israel wants,
I think they would have followed suit the
same.
So that's his opinion though. But he goes,
the only reason why America public is getting
it is because of Donald Trump. Well, that's,
I guess, accurate in the context of the
next 75 days.
But he goes just stating facts, but here's
what he says in response. This person says,
who will be controlling the algorithms? He says,
the CIA and ADL. Just a guess. So
as much as he seems to be thinking
that Trump did this in a bit, he
still sees that it will only still be
led by these groups. So I find it
hard to see that or feel that he
thinks Trump would be on the right side.
Either way,
just another perspective. Per perspective. Drop site news
says in Israel's parliament earlier this month, ADL's
chief, Greenblatt, we've talked about,
talked about TikTok. Right? We just played this.
This is a short clip.
We must,
you must
take this deadly
seriously.
Pushing extremists off Wikipedia
might not seem equal to the challenge of
pushing Hezbollah
north of the Latanya River.
Capturing TikTok
might seem less meaningful than holding on to
Mount Hermon.
Libelous tweets
certainly
might seem less deadly than missiles from Yemen,
but this is urgent because the next war
will be decided based on how Israel and
its allies
perform online
as much as offline.
Well, there's no way we can pretend that's
not connected as he's literally pointing at TikTok.
So so to be clear about this, guys,
there's you could argue that that wasn't the
main point. But to pretend that that's not
a part of the conversation, which is a
huge part of the Republican team sport game
right now, you're lying. Just flat out lying
because it's very, very public.
Interesting, isn't it? I think that reveals exactly
what we're getting at here.
And then, of course, you've got Blinken as
we already showed you before. I don't think
I grabbed that one. Yeah. I just that's
just that's Blinken doing the same thing.
Glenn Greenwald saying here's secretary Blinken and Matt
and Mitt Romney telling you explicitly why they
thought it was so important to ban TikTok.
Why? Well, because of the ADL demanded
it. Yeah, guys.
James Lee, I shall grab that since I
bring it up,
is, we had an interview with him about
this exact point. And it is the fact
that the ADL is obviously a simply a
spy organization for the United for Israel and
the and the United States.
Well, simply for Israel, but you get where
I'm going with it. The point is
it's interesting and obvious how they've worked their
way through these social media platforms
to essentially the point of dictating the outcome.
And I think we're watching that right now.
This is called the true nature of the
ADO and how it spies on Americans for
Israel. It's a 20.24 minute documentary. This is
our hour or something interview about it.
But man, if it wasn't, it's not the
most obvious thing in the world. And we
just went through a lot of this recently.
They're telling you guys, it's about look, lawmakers
admit they want to ban TikTok over pro
Palestinian content. I think I've got that right
here too. Yeah. This even the Rolling Stone
covered it. It to be clear, it's not
just some anti semitic conspiracy theory. The US
lawmakers voted to ban TikTok in order to
shut down criticism of Israel among young people.
They openly admitted that was the fact that
they were doing.
I mean, you know, I might as well
make this point since
I wasn't gonna play it again, so we
just played it. But what she's saying and
how it connects, I do think is very
relevant that this is what it's about.
Was it, this one?
I
also wanna point out that we have a
major,
major
generational problem. All the polling I've seen, ADL's
polling,
ICC's
polling,
independent polling suggests
this is not a left right gap, folks.
The Asian United States' support for Israel
is not left and right.
It is young and old.
And so we really have a TikTok problem,
a Gen Z problem that our community needs
to put. The same brains that gave us
Tagli,
the same brains that gave us all these
other amazing innovations
need to put our energy toward this,
like, fast, and, again, like we've been chasing
this left, right divide.
It's the wrong
game.
The real game of the next generation.
We saw a dramatic change in the language
of the activists here in America on October
8th.
The language of groups that we belong tracked
who've long been problematic,
like Students for Justice in Palestine and Jewish
Voice for Peace.
The language I could show you from their
toolkits
because our analysts are in their groups.
We saw this again on October
8th. It was that fast.
Like the language in their toolkits
was all about the Zionist entity.
YEL is an Israeli spy organization
masking around as a supposed civil rights group
and doing real harm to the Jewish community
writ large in order to run cover for
the state of Israel.
So have the power to monitor social media
activity across all major platforms
and change social media algorithms the way they
see fit. Don't believe me? Well, here's Jonathan
Greenblatt, the CEO of the ADL. We work
with YouTube to have we to get them
to change their algorithms.
We work with Facebook on trying to use
a redirect method. So when you search for
holocaust,
you get directed to, like, a Yad Vashem
page.
We opened
a center in Silicon Valley back in 2017,
and the woman who runs it, she's the
next Facebook executive.
I have software engineers and data scientists working
at ADL.
We're monitoring
all this stuff, and we're working with all
the platforms, by the way. Google and YouTube
and Meta and Twitter and Reddit and Steam
and Amazon, all these companies. From, like, Apple
to Zoom, we work with all of them.
Some might call that a conspiracy fact.
Just saying. And if their ability to influence
big tech and media isn't disturbing enough,
the ADL also partners with payment platforms like
PayPal to monitor online transactions
and cancel payment processing for those whose speech
they disapprove of.
Super important.
Very, very clear. Now I think what I'm
seeing
is my concern that this is more coordinated.
So as as Arnaud Petron writes, and I
think that was
no, it's different. So he simply goes, wow,
this is huge.
I just tried my with I tried it
myself with a foreign phone number.
You can apparently choose any country. Now this
is in regard to the whole, like, red
note,
or TikTok overlap. Like, this is kind of
the bigger conversation where people are finding out
in their own experience right now that despite
the narrative from the US government and the
blocking of certain things they can't access, if
they found a way around it,
China doesn't seem to be restricting their access
to things that they are told they're not
allowed to see. Now, obviously, it's not outside
their own possibility that there's some manipulation going
on there. That it's like a North Korea
storefront fake thing or whatever they're talking about.
But maybe not. And what I keep seeing
is people like this that are going through
their own process and going, woah, hold on
a minute. Like, as he says, I just
tried it for myself with a foreign phone
number. You can apparently choose any country, see
a screenshot. And it's true. You can now
join this Douyin thing, the Chinese version of
TikTok, as an international user. So that means
that China opened up their side of it,
which they're which it wasn't open before.
Now on this side of it,
that's not the case. So it's saying, which
means the great firewall is coming down and
in the most unexpected way with the world
joining the China side of the wall. Really
feels like a Berlin Wall moment except in
the opposite direction. Now whatever your feelings on
that, whether you think it's good or bad
or whatever, what's interesting to me is that
this is showing,
a deviation or, like, a discrepancy
between what we're told,
typically,
which is pretty much everything you look at
these days and what the reality is outside
of this controlled information field.
Like, the lies about Iran and lies about
these countries. That doesn't mean that they're all
good and it's all the point is that
they lie about all of them
aggressively
so you it's dehumanization
or whatever else it is. It doesn't mean
that they're good guys. That they wouldn't just
you know, some of it's not that doesn't
mean some of it's or that it's all
false.
But what's interesting to me is I think
what we're beginning to see is the real
central
villain of the conversation is the very peep
people presenting themselves as the hero.
I said, I get the sense there's a
larger move at play here that goes beyond
even that.
Possibly even one involving more coordination between the
US and China
than we allow ourselves to believe. Just a
feeling. Either way, this all feels very deliberate.
Right? Like, the bringing it down, the opening
of it, and all of a sudden, now
this kind of, like, opening the door. You
know, I I think there were I think
something like, if we're talking about globalism
and technocracy,
those things necessitate this kind of an open
scenario. Now what's interesting to me is as
we're talking about this, the Republicans are the
ones, rightly so, pointing out the congress like
the George Soros overlap and the Open Society's
Foundation. Okay. Well, it's weird how when these
things start happening under a republican lens or
flavor, that they just don't call them out.
That I can't stop seeing.
Now an arbitrand also writes, I have been
the I have to say, he says, the
way TikTok played this whole episode has been
pretty masterful.
They've managed to become a central piece of
Trump's inauguration narrative,
transforming themselves from a bipartisan national security threat
into a victim of government bureaucracy that only
he can save or that was played like
a fiddle, so you felt
that. And they were always working together.
The bureaucrats are seeing I'll show you the
picture. But mostly because they know they've been
outplayed
being now cast as the villains of the
story. That's his perception on it. Frankly, a
case study in crisis management and narrative reframing.
In case you didn't see it,
the guy that we're all being told is
a CCC puppet was literally sat front row
next to Gabbard at Trump's inauguration.
That is the owner, CEO of TikTok.
You know, it's one of these things that
so either the
the partisan game is to play whatever in
front of you as what you need it
to be.
If what we've been told by even like
the Tom Cottons of the world or plenty
of other Republicans that are constantly pushing the
idea that this is a thing that needs
to be shut down because of the CCP,
all of a sudden, that's the case,
to me, I think we're dealing with something
different than all of that. I think that
if we can't stop seeing the obvious Israel,
Zionist, globalist, technocrat, kind of influence control over
this outcome, and then we're seeing things like
this that even seem to deviate from some
of the other Republican circles, I think we
need to start asking what's really happening here.
Now, on the
executive orders, just quickly to go through them
so you can see them for yourselves.
This person, Anna Mastin,
not familiar, just saw this circulating and she
just kinda breaks down. It had 19,000,000 views
because it is she throws them all together,
right? It's easy to reference.
Here we go. This is a list of
the of all
the executive orders, which I find interestingly different
than this post.
President Trump executive orders, mega thread. And then
only list what? 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. Not
all of them is my point, unless they
added more of them that I missed.
Maybe they did. It's a it's small point
anyway. But the point here is that I'm
I'm always looking for the, you know, package
presentation
of how you should see things versus how
they really are. This one is just kinda
going through the each ones, and it says
withdrawing from the Paris agreement.
So my point from before.
So now we've had Trump withdraw. We've had
Biden go back in. Now we've had Trump
pull it back out. Doesn't that feel stupid?
It should because all it's really doing is
keeping you pla pacified, placated.
I mean, guys, if if this is how
it's gonna keep the what's the what's the
real point? If every single time it's executive
order back to the way we like it
and executive order back the way we like
it, then it doesn't mean anything. All they're
doing is keeping you
pacified
for
4 years. And then, you know, and then
you play the rebel, and we're kicking back
against the evil power structure every single time,
but they play see, what they've done is
effectively outsourced or rather without outsourced,
but redirected
our desire to push back against the power.
Right? It's a play. We play out this
game every time where we get to pretend
we're fighting the evil government for 4 years.
Even though you're not, you're simply fighting half
of the government and allowing to continue. Then
it switches around, then we go, now we're
out of control, and then we're fighting the
evil government.
Now that's not even the majority. Right? But
that play goes back and forth. The rest
of us are over here going, what? You
know, it's
the point is that that's what they need.
And they used to be, I think, more
than not. I think now they see that
we're not playing that game anymore. But I
just want you to see that back and
forth.
Paris agreement. Now we're out of it again.
The delivery emergency price relief. Now some of
these I'm just gonna breeze by. The point
let me I'll I'll point out. A lot
of these I would agree with. K? My
thing is, first of all, that the executive
order dynamic is frustrating, like I just said,
because it's just that means it's not we're
not in a world where these things are
set. Now we have, you know, whatever we're
talking about. The law is passed, and that's
what we go forward. We don't even live
in that world anymore. Every now, they can
just move it back and forth every time
they want because we don't have any structure.
It just seems to be
will by decree just like everything else, the
government, emergencies,
everything, guys.
And on top of that, when you're in
a position where you have the most control
you can essentially gain for the most part,
and you don't even try to go through
the government to process, all they're showing you
is that doesn't even exist.
Neither does your vote, quite frankly, to put
people in position, but that's you know, my
thoughts on that. But overall,
my point is that I I would still
go, yeah. Some of these might be good,
but if it's it's if
I'll I'll I'll let's just say with the
caveat that as an executive order, it's open
to interpretation. It could be changed. It doesn't
even technically apply to the entire country. So
that being said, deliver this one was price
relief as I order the heads of all
executive departments and agencies to deliver emergency price
relief consistent with applicable law to American people
to increase you know, this is my problem
with executive wars in general, though.
It's very vague
and is open to interpretation. And on top
of that, it's within the law, and so
we can you know, all the if you
had something that was actually mandating something that
was long lasting, I would argue that's much
better. But maybe this turns out to be
good, and so that's why we so action,
I would say right direction for a lot
of these things. But now it's important to
see how these get implemented.
So that's another step. And this is how
the world works. The game where partisans like
to go, we did it. We won. Now
start cheering for Trump. It's not the way
the world works. Not to get angry when
you don't just blindly cheer on the person
they like. We have to keep like, as
we say every time, if you're not willing
to hold their feet to the fire more
than anybody, then you don't even believe in
them. Because a real supporter would make sure
that they hold to their promises.
You guys are just all in for the
game. Okay? The point is going forward,
a lot of these are gonna be something
that get, I think, quickly put aside. But
this one says hiring freeze. Which so these
ones don't really mean that much, but it's
kinda like pause. But it's saying, well, pause,
temporary freeze of hiring until the administration's in
place. So all that was meant to do
is demonstrate or feign to the people that
support Trump that we're gonna make sure we
put the right people in place, but that
has never historically been the reality. Not the
last administration, very clearly not this administration. But
let's just keep pretending like it's flowers and
rainbows because Zionist technocrats. Zionist technocrats.
Now it goes it says, additionally, within 90
days of the date of this memorandum
that's just what I say. This one goes
regulatory for you. Same thing.
Do not it says, do not propose or
issue any rule or manner including by sending
a rule until they effectively kind of take
over everything.
Same point.
Return to work in person. I agree with
this one. I think it's silly that we're
in a position where we try to shove
everybody into the Zoom world, but let's realize
it was all it's all steps and incremented
moves, guys. That's not gone. All they did
was very much normalize and work that in.
All he's doing now is executive ordering something
that can be taken back later, by the
way, but also that probably won't even be
really enforced.
But overall, the point is that heads of
all departments and agencies in the government,
not just not you, but the government,
essentially have to show up for work.
So, you know, it's I I agree with
that. Right? But why would you just do
this the right way?
Now,
and the weaponization of government. This is the
kind of stuff that I get irritated with.
The attorney general
thanks, Twitter.
See what this did? So stupid.
This problem I'm I'm sweating because this platform
is not
it it glitches just right for the right
kind of people, always. Consistently glitches, which you
guys notice if you watch. But a attorney
general in consultation with the heads of all
departments and agencies in the United States shall
take appropriate action to review the activities of
all departments
and agencies
exercising civil or criminal enforcement authority in the
United States. Now there's more if you read
these. Some of them not much more. Just
a couple paragraphs.
But and the weaponization of government. I mean,
these are broad, flimsy,
basically toothless claims.
Sure. If you believe that Trump's the guy
that's gonna save the world, then maybe you're
shouting me down for even second guessing it
for a second. Well, that's just your belief.
And as much as I can respect that
you believe him, I'm not meaning that to
be sarcastic.
I do not bank my actions, my thoughts
on whether or not I want to believe
in somebody.
An honest adult in the room, as we
were being screamed at before the election, would
bank it would base this on the actions
that come forward. Now, yes, saying that or
let's just even say making an executive order,
which I would argue is still an action,
that's a step in the right direction.
But what does it mean? What does the
end of weaponization of government mean? Does that
mean the Trump administration's not gonna apply its
government power to weaponize it in ways that
work for them? I hope so.
Do you think that's the case? Are we
really gonna be that naive?
Historically, this is not the reality. And I
think, guys,
weaponization of government might as well just be
called government.
It's what it is.
But I hope. I certainly hope. My point
was if they were gonna say end this,
I'd like to see a lot more than
just
in consultation with all departments to take action
to review activities. Basically what it says. Cool.
So you guys will go after the ones
you think are democrat things. It's probably what's
gonna happen because that's what your people in
the team sport circles like to cheer about.
Restoring free speech, same point.
It's a pretty hollow thing to say while
you're literally involved with censoring people. Elon Musk
is in the government, and he's still censoring
people on Twitter right at this moment.
Or the fact that the US government is
actively working to suppress
antisemitism.
And most of that are things that aren't
even actually antisemitism.
But even if it was, whether it's antisemitism
or hatred against Christians or whatever else, it's
your right to feel and say what you
want.
That's called free speech. That's called the bill
the your ideological freedom that we pretend in
this space. The reality is that that's not
really what happens. But
if he does the point is you don't
need to write this down. You don't need
to make an executive order. All that does
is prove to you that they either, 1,
don't understand what free speech means, or they're
just doing it to get you to scream
about the thing that you don't have to
write down. It's inherent. It's a god given
reality for any human being.
In this case, outlined for the American people.
But remember, this was just a god given
thing that they just simply documented. Whether they
ever wrote the constitution or not, or they
they ultimately
or the or the, the or the bill
of rights. The point is ultimately
I was gonna say the declaration of independence
and the constitution or the bill of rights.
The point is ultimately the argument was these
things are inherent god given things, whether they
ever wrote them down. Remember the bill of
rights is simply being the first 10 amendments
to the same point.
So when he says
restoring free speech and writes, it is the
policy of the United States to secure
the right of the American people to engage
in constitutional practice speech. It's a fair statement
because what he's making it about is securing
your right to do so. It doesn't say
that they gave you that right. But if
you understand the way that this goes, it
says restoring freedom of speech.
Well, there's no restoring something that's inherent that
you always have. There's acknowledging that there's,
respecting that right. And like I just said,
it seems pretty clear that they don't. Trump
is currently working with Israel to suppress these
things. So as we go forward,
that will matter. But to me, this is
just a butt buzzword thing to get people
to go, yeah. You see? So we're over
here going, look at what they're doing.
And this gets shoved in your face. See?
He wrote free speech on Twitter and said
that, you know, he wrote this down on
a piece of paper and signed executive order,
so you're wrong.
Okay. But here he is doing this. Okay.
But that's the paper.
What means more? I mean, whether it's Elon
or anything else. Like, you get the
point. We're sending 78 Biden executive orders, and
there there's the game. Right?
Signing one thing. Boom. Oh, those are gone.
All those things are done, and realize that
these things every time have effects.
Right? We've we've seen the dynamic with the
app being turned off at the border thing,
and it's like, look. I there's plenty of
things that I could point out are good
and bad. The point is simply just that
these kind of broad sweeping actions, it's almost
it's jarring.
Right? It's schizophrenic. It's like this constant and
that's what they want,
quite frankly. I think they want us to
get away from even carrying. They want we
just do what we're told. That's what this
feels like.
Grant a full, complete, and unconditional pardon to
all other individuals convicted of offenses. What's funny
about this is a statement says that, but
then the actual page is granting pardon to
come come come, commuting the sentence of certain
offenses,
which is actually what's happening. They've already made
it clear that people that they claim are
violent offenders, which I don't even know what
that means in this context,
are not gonna be pardoned. But, again, as
this plays out, we'll know for sure. But
to me, it's funny how we're talking about
everyone's criticizing pardons on one side versus the
other.
Now you know my opinion about January 6th.
These people were set up. And quite frankly,
I think a lot of these people, almost
every single one of them that are persecuted
for it, do not deserve any of it.
I only say it like that because I
wonder if there's some that are playing a
role in all of it. But my point
on the lessons, if it's it's manufactured and
they're being lied about what happened, then clearly,
this is a game and they don't deserve
to be persecuted for it.
But overall,
once we get into the pardons of Biden,
which are ridiculous, it's interesting to see how
that gets played at the same time. Right?
One says, we're doing this. Plenty of democrats
don't want this to happen, and it becomes
an offset. Right? That's how it works.
Extending TikTok deadline. So that's all this is,
extending the deadline.
75 days
for for the same outcome.
We'll come back. What's your offer to the
WHO? Hooray.
Good. I think the WHO is terrible. But
let's not forget, this already
happened.
As Whitney was saying today, to be fair,
Trump also left the WHO mid 2020, then
just redirected the money to Gates Gavi Foundation,
which as I said, yep. Here's Derek's article
for TLAB written in 2020,
called the vaccine bait and switch. As millions
pull from WHO, Trump gives 1,000,000,000 to Gates
founded Gavi.
The simple point as we discussed in the
show
was that you feigned removing money from WHO.
Right? And then gave it to Bill Gates
back, Gavi, which then was funding
was it 4 I forgot the exact amount.
Oh, more. A lot more
than was going from them through WHO. So,
effectively, all that happened was that money got
he gave more money to WHO
while winning in the minds of his people
because he stopped funding the WHO even though
he didn't. He gave them more through Gavi.
It's very simple, and it's documented. You can
look at it and prove it for yourself
if you think it's not true. So here
we are again. Now I'm not saying I'm
not saying that I know for sure that
this is going the same way. But did
we not already see Bill Gates?
I haven't seen Trump speak up even though
Alex demanded an answer.
Bill Gates had a meeting with him in
Mar a Lago. Bill Gates said we had
a great talk and he's excited about worst
v 2.0. He's I didn't call it back,
but that's what he's talking about. We're talking
about polio vaccines and HIV vaccines and mRNA
COVID shots 2 that's what they're talking about,
and he said Trump was excited. Now, yes,
he could be misrepresenting it. I haven't seen
anything else. Maybe Trump lied to him. I
would never pretend I know like a lot
of people pretend on the other side of
the not the left right, but of the,
you know, honesty scale.
But what's interesting is with Gates being closer
yet again,
I'm not I would not be surprised if
we saw the same damn thing. And how
would you how much you wanna bet if
it goes the same way and they get
denied yet again?
But again, my point is outside of the
executive order caveat, I think this is still
a good step. It's follow through that matters
and not funding them from something else.
And and let's realize that also means, like,
other people
through them in the same way that we
might not even be able to see. That's
also worth considering. Restoring accountability.
Reinstates a previous executive order, same kind of
silly game that we play back and forth.
And this is about employees or applicants restoring
accountability to policy influencing positions with the federal
order. Blah blah blah. So this one's holding
former officials accountable for election interference.
Takes away the security clearance from 51 CIA
agents. Right?
See, he's fighting the deep state. Well,
part of it,
as if you think that every CIA agent
represents the deep state, which is probably one
of the easiest ways to look at it.
It's not inaccurate.
They're mostly almost entirely unelected entities. Right? Aside
from the
well, technically, all of them if you it's
appointed through somebody elected. Nonetheless,
it's not the entire CIA.
And what happened to Kash Patel in destroying
the FBI and all this stuff? Yeah. We're
not we're it's going time. Maybe it'll happen.
But I kinda think we all see that's
not what's going on. So what we're seeing
here is Trump and Noam openly say we
need to work with the CIA. So if
all you're gonna do is pretend that the
good side is working with Trump, how the
hell do you think you know that? Because
Trump said,
are we in kindergarten? Like, I just we
need to start
deserving of ridicule.
If you are playing a game where you're
acting like a fanboy at an Elvis concert,
then you get called out for it. Because
the reality is you don't know what they
think and feel. You don't know what Trump
wants. I mean, you know what he said,
and you could argue that's something that might
happen and here are the facts to back
it up. But if I'm simply pointing out
that they're working with the CIA and and
then I could point at your tweets from
2 years ago saying here's why the CIA
should never, And all of a sudden, you
get where I'm going. Right now, they're telling
you to work with the CIA to fight
against some Al Qaeda secret plot. By the
way, the vanilla Isis biological overlap that we've
been telling you is coming.
But don't worry. He got rid of 51
of them, so we're all good. Right? Must
have been all the bad guys.
I'm just pointing out that it seems a
little naive to assume we know anything about
this. But
getting rid of 51 CI agents, I guess
that's a good thing.
I don't know what maybe they're all the
ones that were trying to stop them. I
I who knows? I would argue if it
was a good thing, you would have gotten
rid of the CIA, which I think would
be an effectively good thing for the world.
National emergency at the border? Okay. So here
we are. National emergency.
I don't care what your logic is around
it. I can't believe we're a place where
we think a national emergency coming off the
COVID dynamic is in any way a good
thing.
We already have plenty of other national emergency.
National emergencies already declared that never seem to
end, including the COVID one that extends through
the FDA emergency authorizations. We've got the emergency
in place for the bird flu, which extends
to just the flu, which nobody seems to
care about. I made that very clear on
my show. Or we have the opioid epidemic.
I mean, these things just never go away.
How long until we just are net well,
here we are. Executive order by executive order,
state of emergency. Now we we don't have
what we believe we do even in what
we pretend we do forever.
On top of that, I'm gonna show you
that it doesn't even seem to be about
the border.
Resolve security clearances,
memorize and resolve the the backlog of clearances.
Great. So hand out all your clearances to
all your people that you haven't got ethics
checks from. Good times.
Trade policy addressing unfair and unbalanced trade, which
I think is gonna amount to
say,
tariffs, which only amount to more spending for
you.
Clarifying
the military's role in protecting the territorial integrity
of the United States, which is alarming to
me, I think. It's a policy of the
US to ensure the armed forces of the
United States prioritize the protection of the sovereignty
and territorial integrity of the United States. Yes.
Broad, bland statement we all should agree with.
But does that mean now we're gonna talk
about something more on your borders, potentially internally,
under some justification that we have to do
x, y, and z because bad democrats are
in, you know, immigration problems that are all
being manufactured by your own allies.
I mean, it's not hard to think about.
Why would that why would you need to
clarify a role that's very publicly documented?
Well, you guys are the ones that are
fighting wars overseas.
And if you think that means you're not
gonna keep doing that, well, you're lying to
yourself. So to me, this is opening the
door
to just a militarized state, which is what
they want for the rollout of what's coming.
I'm I'm just these are my opinions. Hopefully,
you know that. Unleashing American Energy
says in its policy, the United States is
to encourage energy exploration, production of federal lands
and waters, including our outer continental shelf in
order to meet the needs of our citizens
and solidify the United States as a global
energy leader.
Well, this overlaps with a lot of the
stuff we've talked about.
The imperialism, the the authoritarian like, the globalism
even. Because you realize
Greenland
has a lot of resources. I guarantee that
will play a factor on what this means.
It's necessary for American
dominance or may I mean, under Trump, maybe
that's the word they'll use. But maybe they'll
go the more measured route and say, you
know, security, freedom,
even though we are taking it from somebody
else who does not want it at the
people nor the government as best I can
tell. But then it goes, ensure an abundant
supply of reliable energy is readily accessible in
every state and nation. Eliminate the electric vehicle's
mandate.
Here's what's interesting to me.
This is a complete,
a guess. Predict prediction, if you will.
Eliminating the mandate for EV electric vehicles is
only gonna make it look like he won
in the sense of saying that, look. We
didn't we're not forcing it.
And then watch as that very same thing
gets rolled out either way
through Elon Musk and all the rest of
them that are very adamant about that being
the future. Elon Musk has tweeted it 55
times about how that is coming. That's the
future.
He runs Tesla for crying out loud or
at least he pretends to. So what I
think is interesting
is you're literally talking about abundant, reliable energy
and making people believe you mean oil, which
is not the reality. And then removing the
mandate, but then
the technocratic future is coming. They are rolling
out those futures. They are talking about green
energy. It's the same
thing. So hope I'm
wrong. Realigning the US refugee admissions,
basically,
real the says,
United States will admit only those refugees who
can fully and appropriately assimilate in the United
States to ensure that United States preserves taxpayer
resources. Now, that's interesting to me. I don't
know. I mean, see, it's these things are
so broad. What does that even mean? Who
how do what's the metric on how you
can prove whether or not they can fully
and appropriately
assimilate?
Do do you not see the very obvious
opening there for racial interpretation? For, oh, well,
you're a Palestinian, so you can't appropriately assimilate?
You can assimilate, but not appropriately.
I think you all know where this goes.
That is, in my opinion, a Israeli Zionist
pro extremist
action. Not just the statement. It could argue
just you wanna protect us from potential problems,
which should happen.
I'm arguing like a lot of these, these
are broadly stated executive orders with very little
interpret very little they're very open to interpretation
that are gonna be abused by the people
that are actually running this country.
Like, a lot of this stuff, which is
pretty concerning to me. In this case,
dictating who is and who is not allowed
to come in the country.
American citizenship.
It says, it is the policy of the
United States that no department or agency of
the United States government shall issue documents recognizing
United States citizenship or accept documents issued by
state, local, or other governments in regard to
persons that are, you know, basically a mom
giving giving birth while in the United States
and then that person gets citizenship. Right?
Well, it's interesting. It's a fair point to
make that
that would be in somewhat a violation of
other things in the past. But it's interesting.
I'm gonna hold that off for later. We'll
see how this develops. Only because it's interesting
to consider that we're talking about something a
bit down the line and whether or not
this does actually violate a previous constitution's right.
We can get into that. But my point
is always is this is an executive I
don't know why an executive order about the
border has in it that's not the executive
branch, guys. That has no in bearing on
what we're talking about. But it will still
be regarded as that.
Secure the border. It's the policy of the
United States to take all appropriate action to
secure the border in our nation. So include
building a wall and deporting illegals.
Except what he means is a biometric wall,
which we'll get to in a second as
he's already very clearly stated a long time
ago, and both of them have backed up
recently.
Both Trump and Kamala, that that was what
was coming.
Putting people over fish is simply stopping radical
environmentalism to provide water to Southern California.
Great. So when we're in a position where
we need like, it's just so funny how
these things work. So now you get a
bunch of people screaming that these radical environmentalists
well, you know what? I don't even know
which ones he's referring to. And I guarantee
there are plenty of radical environmentalists.
But at this point in time where we
are destroying this world, not because of
carbon and not because of climate change, but
because of the obvious things our government and
I mean, are doing to us, let alone
to the
world, that maybe we need a little bit
more environmentalism
conversation to understand what we're doing.
But, of course, that will be taken as
Democrats for it because that's how the game
works. Even though dioxins and PFAS and glyphosate
and god knows what else is being jammed
down your child's throat matters to me.
But don't worry, we're gonna put people over
fish. So basically, keep dumping things. Over time,
about removing regulations and all this. Guys, this
is business before people is what this will
ultimately amount to in every circumstance just like
it did last time. I certainly hope I'm
wrong.
Now these aren't just based on executive orders,
by the way. It's based on his past
precedents. But the the death penalty, great.
I mean, isn't it just wild that we're
in a place in the world where this
is being praised?
First of all, aren't we talking about Christians
here? Isn't the whole game that you're pretending
to be a oh, excuse me. That you
are a practicing Christian?
Any ideas that you're gonna restore the death
penalty?
In what right do you feel you have
the ability to dictate who is and who
is not put to death in the context
of being an actual Christian?
But you know what?
I guess I just don't understand. Because Trump
is sent by God so he must have
some insight, is what we're told. That's not
a joke, by the way. There's an entire
alarming movement in this country and especially in
Israel that believe he is a prophet.
It's not a joke, guys. It's very prominent.
So what worries me is that we can't
reconcile. We can't see
how contradictory that is.
What? Because you I mean, look, there's clear
capital crimes that we could argue. He murdered
somebody. That, you know, I would still argue
the idea of death penalty is something that
we're beyond in this world for the most
part. That's my personal opinion. You guys can
discuss what you want. But we know there
are people that get put to death that
don't deserve it. People that get killed when
they're not actually they're innocent.
Happens all the time.
True. Look it up.
But the point is
that overall,
we're getting there are a lot of different
ways that people can end up in that
position that wouldn't be that we would be
debating it. Right? That way like, how about
somebody ends up in a car accident or
something? I mean, that that's there's times like
that too. Maybe they were drunk and so
they, you know, take it anyway,
the idea that we're arguing that this is,
you know, the step in the right direction.
I mean, the guy, what's his name, Duterte
from the Philippines. That was what he's all
about. Putting the putting drug dealers to the
death. Trump liked that idea.
I just think we're we're taking we're taking
steps in the very wrong direction right now.
Promote beautiful civic architectural.
Submit to me 60 days recommendations to improve
these visual buildings. Oh, fantastic. Okay. So overall,
I believe there was more than that either.
I think I misstep when I
Hold on.
Maybe not.
Any case, there I think there's more, but
anyway, the point is overall, you get my
point where this goes.
Now what I wanna talk about, and there's
the article for Derek's thing by the way,
is the
see, I think I did see there was
some in there that I missed somehow. I'm
I I had them all lined up and
then I think I clicked over 1 and
it was like another thread. But either way,
one that I wanna talk about here is
Doge.
And this is Steve talked about this this
morning.
And I have the art I have the
thing right here we can talk about. This
one's important to me, because this, I think,
is kind of the the buried lead of
it all.
The executive order establishing those is bizarre,
which now here's example where I think that
would apply. Right? Executive branch. Right? So you're
you're establishing an extension of that government body.
That's how that would work. Not saying the,
you know, GLO national dictates. That that's that's
a dictatorship. Anyway,
it's simply a rebrand of an already existing
US digital service.
I'll show you. It's stated right there on
the page
And has nothing to do with cutting federal
workforce. It's entirely about IT modernization
and obvious per purpose of handing out contracts
to big tech. Now, that's what he what
they're talking about, Gumby here, is what the
US Digital Services. What the actual EO says,
at least, feigns like there's gonna be some
kind of an action in the right direction
as they kind of follow-up on and say,
first caveat,
that it's interesting that it's saying, it Doge
is involved in, though, is not in charge
of
developing
federal hiring plans,
which seem to be focused on hiring employees
as opposed to covering them. But there's all
the the statements in it that make it
sound as if they're gonna reduce the size.
But so think about it. If you're gonna
be bringing people on,
you can either and so you'd only either
be cutting enough to make that a reduction,
even though you're hiring people, which would make
sense.
Or you're hiring as many as you're firing,
which would be a wash.
Or the obvious, which would mean that you're
not getting rid of people. You're just hiring
some more than you're letting go. Which is
kinda what I expect with the same as
all these things. But let's go into this.
Thank you, Gumby, for pointing this out.
So, here is the actual page, first of
all. And it says,
establishing and implementing the president's department of government
efficiency.
This executive order establishes the department of government
efficiency
to implement the president's
Doge agenda, DOJ agenda,
by modernizing federal technology
and software to maximize government efficiency, which by
the way, right out of the gate is
exactly so right they were like, they're gonna
cut this and get rid of agencies, and
maybe they will.
But what that says
is exactly what we were like, this is
probably what it means. Artificial intelligence, improving technology.
Guess what? That's why Elon Musk is involved
because you're just watching the repackaging
of your technocratic rollout.
We're gonna make it all more efficient. Sort
of like the Neuralink makes it all more
think about it.
By modernizing federal technology, how in the world
how else do you think that reads?
Then it goes on to say, reorganizing
the structure, reorganizing and renaming
the United States Digital Service.
So you're not creating something new.
As it says up here, establishing. It doesn't
say create well, I guess you could read
it that way.
But all you're doing is renaming the digital
US Digital Service. I'll show you what they're
about. I'm sure you can guess. The United
States Digital Service is hereby publicly renamed as
the United States Doge service, the USDS,
which is funny.
United States dollar. You know, it's weird. But
the point is,
interestingly,
I think there's an issue there with regard
to Trump and,
like, actually creating a new arm of government.
That I'm I think they that, you know,
or it was never the plan, but worth
thinking about.
And says, and shall be established in the
executive office of the president, which is exactly
how the orders are supposed to work, as
I was saying.
But
the US Doge service
temporary
organization, as we told you before, shall be
headed by the USDS administrator and shall be
dedicated to advancing the president's 18 month Doge
agenda.
So it's only it's an 18 month limited
dynamic. The US Doge set temporary service temporary
organization shall terminate
on July 4, 2016 2026.
Okay. So what does that mean for the
US digital service? They're gonna rename back to
the old thing?
It's interesting, isn't it? Or, you know and,
hey, maybe you could try to see a
positive in it and argue that they're somehow
gonna
reimagine this into a no longer having a
digital service.
And because we're fighting the deep state, hey,
maybe. I hope you're right.
It says number 4, modernizing federal technology and
software to maximize efficiency and productivity.
So, again,
modernizing federal technology is kinda hard to see
that going any other direction.
We know where the modern technology is going.
It's pretty simple.
And it says, USDS and again, maximizing efficiency
and productivity. I mean, you could always pretend
that means getting rid of things. But the,
the typical government response is to bring on
new things like this. Like creating an entirely
new agency to reduce agencies.
That's the kinda stupid thing you expect from
governments. So maybe it goes down or maybe
they make new poss new positions. Think of
this guy who's gonna fight for this and
reduce that. And then it never all you
do is expand the government, which is what
we're used to.
It says the administrator shall commence a software
modernization initiative
to improve the quality of efficiency of government
wide software.
Ah, okay. So more software.
But it'll improve it, but it's not reducing
anything.
Network and so it to reduce to,
modernize or reimagine
software, network infrastructure,
and information technology systems. Among other things, the
USDS administrator shall work with agency heads to
promote interoperability
between agency 8 networks and systems, ensure data
integrity, and facilitate responsible data collection
and synchronization.
Because right. Because we want them to keep
collecting all of our data. Right?
And then under b, it says agency heads
shall take all necessary steps
in coordination with the USDS administrator and to
maximize extent consistent with law to ensure
USDS
has full and prompt access to all unclassified
agency records,
software systems, and IT systems. USDCDS shall adhere
to rigorous data protection standards.
Okay.
Well, all of that is very clear about
technological advancement. Kind of different than what we
were all pretending or those that wanted to.
But what does something stand out to you?
When we're talking about, you know, not signing
all of these ethics pledges and the obvious
Zionist control
influence over all people we're talking about, and
now all of a sudden you've got
Elon Musk, who arguably is the administrator,
who is literally working on behalf of foreign
government as far as I can tell, who's
ultimately going to be accessing
every part of our Internet our technology systems.
Right? They're gonna be
working with the government wide software, network infrastructure,
and information technology systems.
Aren't we at least a little bit concerned
about that? Like, even you Republicans out there
for ignoring everything because you wanna sign with
Trump. Don't you find it a little bit
concerning
since we know
this has happened all over the world?
This one is about the Israel's global cybersecurity
infiltration, but seems to be relevant.
We also have
what was it?
Well, I'll just include this one since I
can't remember the other name.
There was one that we just I thought
the name of that art of the show
we did, where the guy was caught basically
manipulating elections. Oh, I think that's what it
was.
There it is.
So include all these.
Have you ever seen these guys? And it's
undeniable. These groups are they're Israel's government is
completely influenced and infiltrated cybersecurity all over the
world.
This one talks about, in specifically the United
States, in light of the pager attack. Worrying
about what kind now think about this with
what's happening. So if you can't see the
backdoor of Israel, which is already there by
the way, but it's so much more prominent
right now to where we would worry about
what that might mean for pager attacks in
the United States. Should we run a foul
of what they want, which is what they've
already threatened live on TV, by the way.
Or this, the Israeli election interference and psychological
operation industrial complex. This guy was openly caught
for admitting,
influencing 92 different presidential elections around the world.
And he mentions the United States.
The we have been manipulated for far longer
than we think.
So the point is as you are having
this administrator, making sure they have access and
and we're chain you know, all these things,
I worry about what that really means.
And,
you
know,
documents,
IT systems,
infrastructure.
That worries me. Okay. So here's what I
think is more interesting.
We talk about fusion centers in the past.
Right? So there's 10 well, they're saying we
need to have this work so we're
the information sharing across the governments are are
fast.
Well, what's interesting about that is that's an
extension in the same thing we've talked about.
That's more you know, I don't wanna talk
globalism, but it's the idea of expanding that
sphere into one central thing.
That's just centralization of power in this country.
So fusion centers before this are simply fusion
centers, state owned and operated centers that serve
as kind of focal points of states and
major urban areas for the receipt analysis and
gathering of shared threat related information between
state, local, tribal, and, you know, agencies and
governments and and authorities.
So that that was the kind of the
solution of, like, you know, making sure they
communicate. Because at one point, they were, like,
just different bodies entirely or, like, governments almost,
which is kinda the way it is today,
I think. But now they're expanding that out
to where there's more collaboration.
So you could worry about that if we
see one entity taking more and more control.
Now here's the US digital service. But remember,
this is the renaming of this group to
Doge, apparently.
It says our mission to better to deliver
better government services to American people through technology
and design.
So you could argue it's gonna be more
efficient, but is it gonna be in a
way that is more technologically controlled? And the
very thing that we told you was coming
here
is Google's AI saying United States Digital Service,
the USDS,
which is gonna be Doge,
is a technology unit that works to improve
digital services for the federal government. The USDS
can help with digital identity, which is a
way to verify a person's identity using technology.
Now it's just an overlap, obviously, but the
point is to make it sure we see
it clearly that this is where it's going.
We already know this is where it's driving.
Now if there's an easy way to make
this case, combining this with the immigration dynamic
and simply saying, we have to make this
better. We don't you wanna get rid of
some of these government agencies? Well, then we
have to do it digitally. So we need
a digital ID. We need these kind of
infrastructure. We need it all in one place.
Because these are what people like us have
been screaming about.
And if you if we were looking at
it through corona, you would all be on
board.
Now this is just what it says under
their playbook.
Digital services playbook. The American people expect to
interact with government through digital channels,
such as websites, email, and mobile applications.
Is that what we want? Like, that's that's
the whole twik TikTok or the Twitter
application, like, dealing get driver's license. That's what
they want. Mobile's driver's license, that's just what
they're this whole thing is about driving you
to that point.
Now, by building digital services that meet their
needs, we can make the delivery of our
policy and programs more effective.
Today, too many of our digital digital service
projects do not work well, are delivered late
or over budget. To increase the success rate
of these projects, the US government needs a
new approach. We created a playbook of 13
key plays drawn from successful practices from the
private sector and government that if followed together
will help government build effective digital services.
And you could read through it. So my
point,
obviously, is that this maybe tomorrow will change.
Maybe maybe they'll come out and say, this
is new, but
why would they not have just made a
new thing
if this whole point was to get rid
of these things? You're you're you're standing on
the back of the digital services. That is
super concerning for what we're being told. Just
renaming it and it's still going are they
gonna fire everybody? I mean, we don't know.
My point is right now, typically, you're gonna
get the partisans that wanna believe it's what
it is, they want it to be, are
gonna say this has already changed everything. Because
that's how it works. James Wood will come
out and tell you it's already changed the
world like last time before nothing's even happened.
But if it ultimately comes down to something
that benefits us, then we'll call that out
and we'll praise it. But you know, you
see the red flags too.
Now interestingly,
there's a lawsuit around Doge itself.
Here's what it says. A lawsuit alleging that
Elon Musk's department of government efficiency
violates federal transparency laws is set to be
filed just minutes after Trump's inauguration on Monday.
The legal challenge could spark a significant battle
over a key element of the incoming administration's
policy agenda.
The public interest law firm, National Security Counselors,
plans to file a 30 page complaint,
which was obtained by the Washington Post prior
to its submission. The lawsuit claims that Doge,
a non governmental advisory panel, violates the Federal
Advisory Committee Act of 1972. Now that may
very well change dramatically seeing as how they
essentially just made it into an already existing
government agency or body or whatever you wanna
call it. Maybe that's why that happened to
avoid whatever this was. But it says this
law requires advisory committees to the executive branch
to adhere
to specific rules regarding
transparency,
hiring,
and operational practices.
Well, guys, that's interesting to me seeing as
how my worry is that there is no
transparency. Who are they working with? And what
operational practices are happening behind the scenes with
other things that we don't see?
That have asks access to our entire
technological infrastructure, which is what Whitney and plenty
of others have been telling you is happening
behind the scenes.
It says following his election, Trump appointed Musk
and biotech,
entrepreneur,
Vivek, to lead Doge. Now if you don't
know, apparently, there's a back and forth and
Vivec was saying, oh, I'm gonna run for
congress. And then it came out that Musk
essentially didn't want him part of the team.
I haven't been able to really suss that
out just yet. What's interesting is it already
hasn't gone to plan. Now it's just Musk
apparently.
It's just this whole thing is, you know,
typical. Right? But it says, tasking them with
identifying government regulations and spending programs for potential
cuts. However,
according to Politico, Ramaswamy has since stepped away
to to be the governor of Ohio. But
it came out later for ported anyway
that there was Mike Musk in one in
part of the team after a bad review
or something like that. But what's interesting is
they there's also reports that Trump that Musk
was gonna buy TikTok. And now, he he
said it wasn't true. So obviously, government reports
from media,
especially in the instrumental target media, don't mean
that it's absolutely true.
But it's interesting to me because here's the
actual law they're talking about. Federal advisory committee
act 1972.
It says, a United States federal law that
governs the behavior of federal advisory committees. So
exactly what he's a part of but maybe
now it's different because they're just simply the
US digital services. Right? It was enacted on
October 6, 1972 and aims to ensure that
advice
provided to the executive branch, say, from this
committee
by advisory committees is both objective and accessible
to the public.
The law emphasizes open meanings,
chartering public involvement in reporting.
So interesting that they're kinda going, well, that's
you're break you're vile you're not showing us
what's going on. You're not telling us what
you're saying. There's no transparency. Maybe because they're
working with somebody they're not supposed to be.
All simply up in the air. But I
find that to be pretty damn interesting.
Now, let's talk about the
emergency.
So I saw this on 20th and I
shared it out. I said, Trump to declare
a national emergency at the US border, which
is always how it works. It's, you know,
coming.
And I think it's because they're sitting down
to sign these things, and they all wanna
get ahead of the story.
I just simply said, and it begins.
I don't I don't care what the logic
is. The idea of them declaring more emergencies,
it just it's it's obscene.
We're being used.
Or rather, the ones falling for it are.
Now, I wanna talk about this.
And just think about the we went through
the COVID 19 dynamic. Right? I mean, it's
it's so crazy to me that we saw
how that played out. We saw the abuse,
whether or not you even agreed with the
state of emergency. Right?
The national emergency during COVID 19 is what
gave the Democrats
the ability to declare that to force the
shot, to lock down. Right? That you have
to understand that. So you could argue that
maybe Trump did do it on purpose. Maybe
he made a mistake. They love to take
that argument today. But tomatoes matter. Right? Because
Trump created the, you know, the Stafford, the
the Defense Production Act, the statement the the
declaration of emergency.
All these different the the creation of the
very operation warp speed that created the shot
that killed all these people. But he they
that was their thing before it even became
the Biden's. That's their
you have to blame him for that. There's
no way around it. My point though is
that if the if the
emergency that he rolled out is what allowed
that, how are we not thinking about that
right now?
Whether it's 4 years from now or right
through this with
democrat governors.
Okay? So he declares the state of emergency
in regard to the border. So what if
they start taking action underneath that? Which under
when we're doing call it, well, the governor's
gonna make their own choices.
Why don't we worry about that? Isn't that
exactly the same setup? I just a different
emergency.
The prob but the point is it it's
what they want. So who cares about the
nuance? Who cares about the outcome? It's about
saying we win. Because he did the thing
and he said it. We win. It's just
it's it seems very childish to me. But
I think at the end of the day,
it's obvious where this can go. Even if
he means the best from it, which is
why we shouldn't be asking for states of
emergency. That seems pretty obvious to me.
But here is the
overlap.
Trump declares national a national energy emergency,
orders US to withdraw from Paris Climate Agreement.
Now there is a stated emergency under the
guise of the border or you could say
for the border.
But it says Donald Trump declared emergency declared
a national emergency
as he aims to boost fossil production. Now,
this should just the point is the overlapping
of all this. When you declare the state
of emergency,
there's a lot that can start to happen.
So it says Donald Trump on Monday declared
a national emergency
and ordered the US to withdraw from the
Paris agreement, as we know. And he seeks
to implement a sweeping agenda aimed at boosting
fossil production. Now, that's that's obviously a political
p p. Some people want that, some people
don't. I mean, look, it's objectively clear that
doing this does have effects on the planet,
whether you're fracking or oil. That's but if
you think that's in the best interest, then
you can decide that. My point is
going in this direction,
I think is ultimately about the
it's one, it's control. But I think it's
also about giving the idea giving you the
implicate or the, the impression
that we're not rushing in the other direction.
That's what I would argue. But this is
just my opinion. What What I'm worried about
is on top of this, the idea of
the emergency itself. And it says Trump's declaration
directed the heads of federal agencies
to, quote,
identify and exercise
any lawful emergency authorities available to them to
facilitate the leasing, sitting, production, and generation of
domestic energy sources including
on federal lands.
So I'm telling you guys, right now, most
of that's already happening in this country.
There are places clearly we could tap into
more in this country, but there's usually places
that people need to be moved from, which
might be part of that. But I'm telling
you, this is gonna be about expanding this
country. That's why they're making a statement about
the expansionism,
Greenland, and whatever else. And the Greenland aspect
is all about resources, if not a lot
of other world globalism agendas.
So this seems to be much more about
something else right now, which if you think
about the border,
well, damn, if that doesn't have to do
with exactly this point too, doesn't it? Maybe
not the idea of you thought about immigration,
but it sure as hell matters when you're
talking about maybe changing that border. Right?
But it says the national emergency is crucial.
It's a quote. Because and this is a
direct quote from a White House of, official
saying it's
national emergency
that the national energy emergency
is crucial because we are in an AI
race with China.
And our ability to produce domestic energy,
American energy is so crucial
such that we can generate the electricity and
power that's needed to stay at the global
for forefront of technology.
Is that I mean, that doesn't seem to
be all what we're talking about, does it?
That's stated from that's stated from Trump's White
House. So here
is what we just talked about a minute
ago. I think I'm getting to pop up.
At the time of the hurricane,
right,
in North Carolina,
everybody was talking about the other town
that had to do with lithium. This is
And and, again, lying about that with that
hustle guy lying about it today, about the
other, about the fires, even though it was
a battery
battery storage facility. Lying about land grabs because
that seems to be fun for them to
lie about.
Even though it's very real and serious, and
you're lying about it only makes it harder
for others to believe, which is probably how
that works.
But this is about a tiny town in
North Carolina that didn't get a lot of
attention. Some conservatives did call it out, but
didn't get the fun attention by the big
ones because I don't think they cared about
the truth.
Here is a tiny backwater town in North
Carolina
that produces apparently
sand quartz
you can find nowhere else in the world.
The level of the the quality of sand
quartz sand
that they get from North Carolina
and a town called Spruce Pine
can't be found anywhere else in the world.
I mean, I had to go into this
more to be like, is that it how's
that possible? It seems to be the case.
And this was the epicenter.
In fact, the other town I was talking
about was further outside of this is the
dead center of the storm. Now whether you
think the storm was great or not, is
that the point? But I find it interesting
to ignore this, and it says the tiny
backwater town in North Carolina will help fuel
the world's AI revolution
with enough quartz to powder and tire
$530,000,000,000
semiconductor
global industry.
One space. And it's not just that they
have enough here, but it's the apparently one
location of the world that has the level,
the quality that they can find here.
What I found fascinating is one that's got
ignored by the partisan team sports side.
Why? I think it's because the AI direction
is important to where this goes. The is
a central role.
But also because,
ultimately, this is
a developing thing.
Spruce Pine, if you read into it, has
been dealing with this. Their town's getting slowly
eroded. They're losing stores. It's because they're trying
to push these people out. They want I
I think this is the new Silicon Valley
dynamic,
where eventually you can play a place that
people the point is it's about their development.
And right now, there are people that have
lived there their whole lives. They're like, we
don't even have clothing stores anymore. Like, everything's
gone because no one can survive because these
people taken over. Guess who else is there
now? Google, Apple, Microsoft. They've got massive data
centers they just randomly put up in this
area. Not for the benefit of people at
all.
Isn't it fascinating how this stuff gets ignored
despite that being a wild story? I think
that definitely relates to where this goes.
So as we're talking about
national emergency in order to justify
the in in the energy dominance needed for
the artificial race, artificial intelligence race, I think
we're seeing the real picture. But the partisans
are talking about something else entirely.
Include this too.
Now, political rights,
Trump
and the Davos men
are back.
January 20th. Here's what it says.
Interesting. It says everyone's talking about AI's potential.
But potential doesn't drive business value. Results do.
Even a technology as profound as artificial intelligence
is only as good as the value it
creates. Join IBM
at the World Economic Forum and learn how
leading companies are turning AI investments into measurable
returns.
Of course, if if you don't remember, I
I should grab that actually so you don't
miss that. And it does say it in
here, but just in case you didn't see
it.
World Economic Forum says Trump does take part
in the virtual virtually, of course, in the
Davos meeting,
which is the that that that's what they're
using. Oh, well, he's not gonna be there.
It's like, would you would you make that
caveat for Kamala Harris? No. You would not.
It's all about who you choose to believe,
not based on actions. That's what's important for
partisans. But here,
US president Trump will deliver a virtual address
to supposed to be the enemy. Right? And
it says they're never share they never shared
the begging emails
from Elon Musk when he was a bit
younger, trying to get his foot in the
door to go to Davos. But they do
exist, I can tell you. And they're pretty
craven, miserable, and pathetic.
Well, it's embarrassing.
As far as I can tell, this does
seem to be backed up. The point is
right now, Musk, I think is playing a
role. And that role is to give you
the impression that you that he is the
outsider,
even though he's never been anything but an
insider in this entire situation.
Oh, wait. Shoot. Tell me I didn't disclose
that. Oh, that's right. I opened that. Here's
the next one.
They'll never it says they've never shared the
oh, I just got that one. It says
Trump will be sworn in as the 47th
president of the United States today, this is
Politico, just as the official opening ceremony of
the World Economic Forum gets underway at the
Congress Center.
And it feels like too much of a
coincidence to me. Trump twice attended Davos during
his first term in office.
That's right.
Unusual for US presidents who usually stay away.
But Trump went twice.
But we pretend like that's not a problem
because Trump's good guy. Right? Doesn't matter what
he does. He's on the right side, according
to them. But it says this year, he'll
address the forum on Thursday. Just days after
his inauguration, World Economic Forum officials say they
expect a broad footprint from the new administration
to jet in later in the week. Though
names have been yet confirmed.
How much you wanna bet the rest of
them go to?
That's the game, guys. And you're gonna get
weirdly enough Republicans screaming that this is okay
because now we're unity. We're unity team.
Some Trump friendly leaders like Argentina president Javier
Millet
We'll fly to Davos to attend the meeting
at the capitol.
Well, what it says, well,
after attending meeting at the capitol. Sorry. I
was thinking it's a congress center.
So and yet another example of a fake
libertarian literally going to be at Davos with
the World Economic Forum. But that's okay though
because he held a chainsaw and yelled the
right words. Right, guys? Here it says, with
Trump taking office under billionaires club, the Davos
set arrives on the Magic Mountain this year
with newfound swagger.
Even as the rest of the world frets
about Trump's threats of a trade war, Wall
Street
has never had it as so good as
your global playbook author reports in this story.
I mean, these these are those people telling
you that they're happy about Trump and yet
you gotta listen to all the, you know,
people random people on Twitter that tell you
everything's going in the right direction.
I mean, Garland Nixon this morning was talking
about the overlap of the CIA,
Wall
Street, which is, you know, more complicated. Clearly,
the CIA was Wall Street was a major
role in where the these people what we're
dealing with today is the conglomeration of all
these same party seem
what would you call
it? Manipulating forces? You know, that at one
point were at their own little power. I
think it's all blobbing together at this point.
Either way, they're literally telling you. We're happy
that he's there.
Trump is packing his cabinet, it says, and
coveted administration advisory slots with deep pocketed figures
from the finance, tech, and crypto worlds.
Among them, Cantor Fitzgerald,
boss and Davos regular, Howard Lendyck, who we've
talked about, Trump pick for commerce secretary, billionaire
venture capitalist, Mark Anderson, who's been advising Trump
during the interim, the
interganum
at the Mar a Lago, and crypto backer,
Paul Adkins.
Right? Or
Zuckerberg
or Bezos or Musk himself
or Teal or all the rest of them.
The Davos men are back. Trump is back.
It's amazing what people can ignore.
Now, 7 c's pointed this out.
The FDA is officially now realize this is
posted on
20th.
K? So these are all actions being taken
on 20th.
So,
I mean, just like any other context in
the past, will that be so right now,
it's Trump. Even though they were giving him
credit before this for things that happened to
Biden or they blame Biden for the you
know, it's just the same game that's always
played. But the point is, arguably okay. So
the FDA, under Trump's administration, is officially drafting
certifications
biological products.
Right. Hooray.
Isn't that exactly what we're all fighting during
the great reset? Like, the way this all
was being played out? Didn't Whitney have entire
conversations about how this was coming? Whether we're
talking about I mean, there's a 1,000 red
flags in this. The FDA?
Isn't that one of the groups they were
swearing they were gonna remove? I mean, guys,
this is a problem.
Considerations for the use of artificial intelligence to
support decisions to force more dangerous drugs down
your throat. I mean, look, I hope that's
not the way it goes. But the FDA
has lost all credibility from every single thing
they did during COVID 19. I'm not talking
mistakes.
Deliberate, willful disregard for the facts.
So is this the direct oh, I'll just
read what I said.
This is the exact type of government efficiency
that was promised. Right?
Increasing AI control over your lives? Or was
this the exact type of efficiency that many
of us warned it would actually be?
I don't know how much you could ignore.
He adds, by the way, and adjacently, the
decades long end the Fed movement
has recently largely been co opted by techno
and crypto billionaires. This is how this game
works.
So like I said, I was worried about
this. Remember, I predicted this
because it made sense. I mean, a lot
of us did. My point is I said
this as just a thought that I thought
made sense and watch as it plays out.
That he'll pretend to end the fed or
maybe he ain't even end it. But all
that he's doing is right behind it in
the in, you know, in the wings
is the digital
ID CBDC private version, whatever.
That would I mean, you think these people
are getting involved with the end of fed
movement because they just wanna see us be
they wanna help us. These are techno crypto
billionaires who want the influence.
We're being played. As, again, as Garland called
this morning, because I'm kinda sort of a
corporate reorganization we're going through right now. He
said the largest tech companies all seeking nuclear
power, many purchases since September when Gates bought
3 Mile Island. Amazon, Google, and Meta following
suit.
Terrifying.
Now
the IMA panel, which I think we're I
think we're gonna have 1 on 24th.
Co opting freedom, this was called the Bitcoin
sleight of hand and the new AI control
structure, September 29th.
This is where it goes. Like, we're watching
this get played out, get rolled out,
and they're just straight up calling it production
of government, apparently.
That's not even seem to be on its
face what's happening.
Doom, give us a chat and update the
chat on what's going on with Twitter. I
was talking about that with Garland this morning.
I mentioned you, letting him know that you
were dealing with the same thing.
So here's where it goes. As Whitney just
covered on 17th, hope Trump supporters will soon
catch on to how the virtual border wall
being built by companies backed by Peter Thiel
on Bilderberg steering committee is meant to serve
as a Trojan horse for digital ID by
not requiring,
not just foreigners entering the US, but any
American traveling abroad to submit it to a
digital ID or digital biometric entry exit system.
I said, it will be by air, by
land, by sea according to Trump, as you've
heard this video a 1000000 times. Now this
is an older one. Yeah. But he backed
it up until recently. So that's not just
immigrants, guys. Right? How often do you I
mean, we're talk you're fly how many immigrants,
illegal immigrants fly into the country, guys? This
is about anybody, which is what Wendy just
said. Welcome to your Freedom MAGA biometric tracking
system.
I'm sure you'll get some fun name like
that when they really wanna shove it down
your throat.
What's funny by the way is that just
somebody else had shared this and I didn't
tag her tweet in it. And it was
like, it's all about digital IDs. I was
like, that's not what he says. Like, oopsie
for I just I I say you forgot
her tweet.
It's just funny how people love to repackage
tweets today instead of just retweeting and sharing
people's what they say. You know, everyone's out
there to get their own chairs. I get
it. But it's funny. For me, it's more
about trying to keep the momentum going. Right?
Retweet that, put a comment on it, keep
the conversation going. But everyone wants to repackage
the thing and put it out on their
own. That's that's a part of his influence
on the whole thing.
Here's Alex Jones. Alright? So as we just
talked about, all these people,
Google,
Amazon,
Facebook,
Meta.
All the good guys. Right? Howard Lutnick right
there.
He says, update tech mogul seen together. Like,
you know, see, what's funny is he knows
that this looks bad. This is my opinion.
So you can't not comment on it. You
gotta be like, yeah, we see it. Right?
Oh, they're they're all together. And he goes,
many of whom have capitulated to MAGA movement
to recent weeks. Oh, go okay. Then we're
good then. Right?
They're they're monstrous, murdering,
genocidal.
You know? They they censored people. They caused
people to die. Oh, I whatever we're talking
about. Pro is real content, but it's okay,
though, because now they're on our side. They
sat next to Trump's side. So
let's move forward.
Is it weren't you guys the ones talking
about never forget with with COVID 19? Oops.
I guess we forgot all of a sudden.
How do people still listen to the I
just don't understand.
Where are the honest people out there? Here,
in case you forgot, Elon Musk, who's there
with them as well,
building a satellite network around the planet that
we can't hide from. That sure sounds like
freedom to me. That's literally the National Wisconsin's
office in an interview recently saying, now you
can't hide because you're constantly being looked at.
And he says, we're working with art Elon
Musk cause we need artificial intelligence to make
all this work. That's his role.
Elon Musk and SpaceX are helping the intelligence
build the world's largest spy satellite network. Of
course, they're involving with Israel.
Now, also include this that Derek wrote on
19th, mother of open AI whistleblower accuses law
enforcement open AI of delaying justice for her
son. Now, read this for yourself. It's important
for two reasons in my mind. 1, because
obviously, the issue here is that she believes
there's foul play. And that argument being, he
was trying to blow the whistle on where
this was going.
Now let's not forget, despite the weird the
effort to make it look like different things,
Elon Musk has overlapped with our with chat
GPT and OpenAI in, like, 3 different ways,
whether it's through Peter Thiel and Palantir or
something else. So you wouldn't be working for
on the same project
if you thought they were the boogeyman that
was gonna end the world with AI. You're
just trying to hype the narrative to divide.
That's my opinion.
So my point is on top of that,
we've got a guy who seemingly was trying
to blow the whistle on some of this
stuff that got taken out. That's the argument.
And now we have people like,
Sam Altman
in this picture that play a very alarming
role. Remember, he's the guy that is, where
was that?
It's right here.
Sam is one Derek
Derek wrote as well.
It's called, Sam Sam Altman, artificial intelligence, the
Bilderberg Group, and Worldcoin. Now it gets into
that in here, and it's creepy. I put
that image down here as well.
It it's this is what they're telling you.
We just we'll scan your irises, and we'll
give you back world world coin.
Literally designed to be some kind of global
currency. That's what we're talking about.
This guy is overlapped with Elon and all
the rest, guys. This is not that hard
to see.
I'll include this one too.
My point though is that I think we're
watching this kind of, you know, tied up
as we go forward.
Now, in the context of cryptocurrency or in
not in the in the category of cryptocurrency,
this just blows my mind because of how
blatant this was.
And that we're watching this. I I think
the cryptocurrency aspect plays a very serious role
in where this is going. And we as
we've had 2 important interviews, I'll grab those
real quick,
from 2 people that have slightly different opinions,
but ultimately, both feel that right now, the
important thing is to not throw the baby
out with the bathwater.
The first one was Mitch Burcham, a very
I don't know if you guys see that.
It happens every time I do it. It
doesn't matter.
So
Mitch's was entitled
how the government commandeered Bitcoin and its decentralized
future. He's of the mind that this was,
you know, potentially started by somebody that was
genuine and that it's such just been commandeered
into a con controlled version that it wasn't
designed to be. Now that makes a lot
of sense to me because of the the
way it was designed, at least put forward
as a peer to peer system that circumvented
government or financial transact financial institutions.
So unless that was the plan to make
you think that was the case,
it still did that. It still was capable
of that. So that's why I find it's
hard to know whether it was started this
way or not. Maybe they designed it that
way to circumvent something different. Right? And who
knows? And then Satoshi took it or he's
the real he's the government. Who knows? The
point is it's interesting to think about where
it goes now.
And we also I also, interviewed
Mark Goodwin,
former,
wait. That should pop up.
Of course.
Former editor of Bitcoin Magazine. It should be
down here. Maybe not.
Man, nothing works for me anymore.
Hold on.
The point for Mark,
the different opinion, is that ultimately believes this
seems to be logically started by
the government.
But nonetheless, is still in a position right
now where we could use it to fight
back like we do with the Internet.
I just wanna include it for you. And
of course, I feel like I'm always being
screwed over by technocracy.
Whatever you're I just determined to make things
happen sometimes be even if it slows the
showdown just because damn it if I'm not
gonna if I'm gonna be stopped. So here
here is both of these, I'll include them
for you.
My point though is getting into the cryptocurrency
side of this and where I see this
going.
So Trump rolled out a meme coin,
otherwise known as SHIT coins. There's a lot
of different names, altcoin. The point is in
most cases, they're known as sort of well,
I guess there's a deviation or kind of
a difference between some of them that are
altcoins that may still have a, like, a
technological purpose but aren't currencies
versus ones that they they call meme coins,
which are basically nothing. It's just it's it
is manageable to be a fiat dollar. It's
only valuable because you believe it has value.
It's not based on anything. In this case,
he rolls out the Trump coin.
Hat like, dollar sign Trump.
And the the the shorthand is MAGA.
Right? And this was rolled out
and
pumped,
talked about. Right? As it says right here,
Trump launches meme coin ahead of inauguration,
has launched his meme coin, which soars to
$7,000,000,000
in capital. Okay. Because clearly everybody's typing in
Trump's coin. Right? But my point is, all
it is is because it has Trump's face
on it. It's all it's just it's not
even
only is a currency because, you know, think
of it like a stock. That's it. But
it's there's no value. It's just this is
my thing. It just has my name on
it. That's it. So what I wanna show
you guys
is that this is exactly it's always possible
that it could've just happened this way, but
I find it really hard to believe. And
more of the, I guess,
trader cryptocurrency
at
somewhere I'm looking for. Experts, I guess. But,
you know, people that know a lot about
that field, chime in if you think this
is let me know if you think this
is even possible without being a pump and
dump. Here's what
happened
right away.
Right? I mean, like, the next day, Donald
Trump's meme coin crashed over 40%. It's way
more than that now. I'll show you.
And it says the coin just erased over
$5,000,000,000
in market cap in a matter of seconds.
Then, Melania Trump rolls out her own coin,
which I haven't even checked, probably that one
collapsed too, has been viewed as a comp
a competitor against Trump coin. This has resulted
in a sharp drop in demand for Trump.
Let's look at this one real
quick. Let's see what this says.
Okay.
$4.13.
Well, you know, pretty cons I mean, for
the most part, stayed reasonably consistent.
We'll see how it goes. Oh, let's go
do,
no. There you go.
Never mind. So, no, it did not. So
here it's the same old game, guys. Okay.
So there's Melania's coin, same thing. So if
you what do you that's not everything like
this succeeds. Most of them fail. So you
could simply argue, I would argue that looks
like a failed coin. Right? It goes up,
it goes down, it but then drifts down
into nothing. Okay.
And that may not even be the right
one for all we know. I just searched
really quickly. That's not the point. This is
the point.
That or this, by the way.
That is what you know. If you're in
if you're involved in this and use there
there's only in my opinion, that is a
pump and dump. That's this is the the
hawk twee coin all the way what happens
is you see it go it start so
we started here. It goes up real slow.
Right? Then you see a little dip,
and then that's right there is before inauguration.
And they go, buy my Trump coin. And
it goes crazy. And you know what that's
from? That's not from big time investors that
are stupid enough to get involved in a
coin they know me as nothing. That's from
supporters. That's from grandmothers and house moms and
and shocker dads and whatever else people that
are going, I believe in Trump, and he's
gonna succeed, and he wants me to make
money, and you buy in for 5 and
10 and a 100, maybe all of your
savings.
And then
instantly drops to effing nothing.
I mean, guys, it is at a dollar.
It was over 4 it was, like, over
$500.
Nothing.
I well, I mean, I make sure make
sure that's not well, anyway, the the amount
was
no. Maybe I take that back. I'm trying
to remember what the amount was.
Honestly, it's irrelevant with this context, but let
me let me look real quick.
Good timing anyway, because I was gonna look
to see if they were talking about it.
Meme coin. See, what's here's what's fascinating to
me.
This says Bitcoin, its new all time record,
ahead of Trump's inauguration.
Trump's new meme coin soars on its 1st
day. Guys, that's one day ago.
So you wanna explain this to me? Well,
we're supposed to pretend the media hates Trump,
and here they are, every one of them
going, this meme coin explodes.
Look.
Some of them. So here here's one that's
going the other way. My point is, you're
telling me all of these platforms here look.
Trump meme coin has turned Donald Trump into
the one of the most that's one day
ago. Gateway Pundit, are you really gonna pretend
that you don't know that it's collapsed
2 days ago? Like, these people are literally
pushing the idea that this has exploded when
it's already collapsed.
So that to me is just trying to
cover up the fact that they just pump
and dump America. But I think what's fascinating
is that shows you the media game is
kind of an illusion. That's what I believe.
But either way oh, yeah. Hold on. I
was about the price.
I didn't type price. That's why.
No. That this is the wrong one. This
is official Trump. I gotta find the right
MAGA one. See, I don't wanna waste all
this time. Let me do
Trump coin price. Let's do that.
It's got it's the one that says MAGA.
I don't think those are the ones. Son
of a gun. And maybe it's it's fallen
off. You guys, I don't wanna waste too
much time on it. See, this is from
19th. Trump meme coin doubles again. Stake worth
58,000,000,000 more. So I just wanna be clear
about this. If you look at it right
now, that's what it looks like.
It went down to basically a dollar, and
it is just leveled out.
And that's why you're getting stories about this
right here.
Where was it? Right here.
I just showed it. There. From, this platform
because they can see it too. But so
apparently, very few people are even talking about
it. But I did see one just now
when I looked. My point is,
why is nobody highlighting, oh, it was the
last one, that this has collapsed?
I just think that's interesting.
Meme coin soars the first out day.
So oh, right there. There you go. It
went to $74
and then down to 1. That's where it
is right now. Same thing, by the way,
that
to Andrew Tate did. He really he's running
for UK prime minister. He clearly is trying
to emulate Trump where he wants to play
the political game because he knows it'll, you
know, let him get out of his rape
and sexual trafficking charges that are very real.
But same game, guys. Now a little bit
different.
Right? It's it's it's but the high the
high the the spike and then immediate fall
is usually a good indication. My point is,
though, is I've never seen a better view
of a pump and dump than that. That's
my opinion.
Paulie says, Kate pump and dump daddy coin.
Literally called bruv coin. What is it? Or
rather the bruv party is what it was.
It's stupid.
But guess what though? After he just gained
$5,000,000,000
or whatever just happened from that pump and
dump, well, guess what? Now we're Donald Trump
junior. To commemorate the inauguration of Trump as
the 47 president of United States, his World
Liberty Financial coin is proud or the group
or whatever it's called is going to announce
the following strategic purchases today.
Great.
Ethereum,
w bitcoin, AAVE, LINK,
TRX.
Okay.
Okay. So what I this this is interesting
to me because what are we talking about?
This is Donald Trump junior. Well, the but
this is Trump's thing. Trump started this with
his face on it in so now he's
the president. So now you're telling me that
he's literally on its face using the presidency
to benefit from his investments? Because that's a
crime. I mean, but they all do it.
But this is just brazen. This is what
we were just saying before. Or Caitlin, just
take the mask off.
That's such a conflict of interest, it blows
my mind. But they all do it. I
just think that's crazy.
Excited for the future.
But what does that mean when they allot
when they start scooping up all this cryptocurrency?
And we're you know, we need to see
where this is going.
Now there's very clear opportunity to make a
lot of money here, for sure.
But it's not what this is all about.
Some people it is. Right? But if for
those of you that really realize where this
goes,
it's a question of whether you wanna make
some money on the way to destruction
or you wanna stave it off. That's how
I would look at it.
But don't worry. Forbes reports in 20th, it's
just begun. Trump and crypto execs tease huge
White House plans.
Alright. So he, from the White House, is
basically running a crypto business at this point.
That's absolutely crazy.
I wish people could call these things
out. Now on the on the idea of
the pardons,
of course, Biden pardoned his family, which is
just cause it's all it's well, first of
all, we need to remember this always happens.
It happens every time. Trump pardoned a bunch
of crazy bit terrible people as well. It
happens every single time.
Biden's family, they're criminals. So is Biden. So
is Trump, by the way. So we have
to understand that this is if you're only
looking at half the picture and you're only
willing to criticize one side of it, then
you're you're being challenged about it. You have
to see,
this is always how it goes. Criticize both.
If you're gonna criticize Biden right do for
now for doing this, then you have to
criticize Trump for doing it last time. It's
just the difference is you only won't like
one side or the other. Nonetheless,
doing this seems crazy to me. Whether it's
his family or somebody like Fauci.
Which, again, I'm so Mark Milley, January 6th,
there's a bunch that happened. But I want
you to see I want you I've talked
about this morning. This says no joke.
That basically the the I've granted onto Anthony
Fauci a full and unconditional pardon.
Okay?
So first of all, why? What did Fauci
do? Now we all know what he did,
but isn't the argument supposed to be that
that's not the case? So the argument becomes
that they know Trump's gonna persecute him. So
we have to pardon him because he's not
he didn't do anything wrong. Well, that seems
a little bit of a weird step to
take before he's even accused of a crime,
Like from the Trump administration.
Okay. So I think it's clear that this
was all look, Trump was involved in this.
You think Trump is gonna go after Fauci
who knows that he's the one come on,
guys. To me, they're both letting Fauci get
out of the way because that's part of
the plan. That's how I see this.
Either way,
the fact that any side, whether Trump last
time or Biden now, can do this, pardon
him for any offenses
against the United States,
which he may have committed or taken part
in during this period of time.
Through the date of this pardon arising from
any so you don't you don't even know
what you're talking about. You're you're just doing
anything.
If tomorrow it turns out he killed 40,000,000
people, then god's a pardon. That's what that's
the that's what it's for. Or what about
tomorrow? It turns out that he stole from
the liquor store. Doesn't matter. He's pardoned.
How is that even possible? Well, guess what?
There's actually an important clip
of Biden making sure you know how he
feels about it. Trump is, reportedly considering a
wave of of preemptive
pardons.
Obviously, from Trump's last administration. Does this concern
you?
All these preemptive pardons?
Well, it's,
it concerns me in terms of,
what kind
of precedent sets and how the rest of
the world looks at us as a nation
of laws and
injustice.
You're not gonna see,
in our administration
that kind of approach to pardons,
nor are you gonna see in our administration,
the approach to making policy by tweets.
You know, it's just gonna be a totally
different way in which we approach the justice
system.
Or not.
Literally at all.
Exactly the same thing, but that's that's how
the game is played. You gotta say the
thing. So they go, see?
He said it. We're gonna be different. And
then they go on claiming that regardless of
what he does. That's how partisanship works. Team
sport politics.
But think about pardoning this guy for just
whatever you may decide to charge him with.
That's every day this shows us that we
don't live in the world we think we
do if we're just honest about it.
I mean, look. If you think this guy,
which he is, is a person who should
be going, you know, in the Hague for
crying out loud,
Would that stop you if you're Donald Trump?
I don't care if you wrote some pardon.
If your whole point is Biden's a war
criminal or Biden is of enemy of the
state, which is how you're supposed to frame
this from from Jones of the world,
then would why would that even stop him?
The the you got people will make whatever
excuses they need to ignore that what we're
seeing is one government protecting itself.
That's what I think.
Ron Rand Paul simply says, if there's any
ever doubt to who bears responsibility for the
COVID pandemic,
Biden's pardon of Fauci forever seals the deal.
I agree.
I as chairman of the senate of Homeland
Security and Government Affairs Committee, I will not
rest until the entire truth of the uncover
on the cover up is exposed. Now,
I don't know where I stand with Rand
Paul in the context. You know, I there's
some of the things he's done over the
past in this very field that makes me
a little bit, you know, he's not his
father. Let's be real about that. But he
has he's you know, I I put him
on a scale, maybe a little bit less
than Massey, even though I don't trust any
of them, but still better than most of
the rest. I'm Jane when it comes to
government. But, nonetheless,
the cover up exposed. I mean, you know,
I just get I feel like we're gonna
get mud get buried in this ongoing narrative
that I think we're we've gone beyond. Not
that we care, but I'll show you what
I mean next. He says, Fauci's pardon will
only serve as an accelerant to pierce the
veil of the deception. Ig
how do you say that? Ignominous?
Anthony Fauci will go down in history as
the first government scientist to be preemptively pardoned
for a crime. It's pretty weird.
Here is
what I think.
Right? I mean, we talked about this with
Denny Rancourt.
Denny Rancourt, excuse me.
That approves COVID 19 is an illusion. Doesn't
mean you don't have to think that there
was no pad death pathogen. The point is
the evidence proves that the data was enough,
whether or not there was a pathogen for
them to have made it look the way
they did with PCR PCR false positives, with
combining flu and pneumonia, using vaccine side effects.
I mean, it's mathematically clear. He made this
very clear. We followed up with him on
this about his continued opinion on it. The
he believes it's a delusion. He says he
called it biological stress induced bacterial pneumonia. Worth
worth your time. It's interesting. But alternatively,
we also talked with doctor David Martin a
long time ago
on 2023, September. Now he's of the mind
very clearly, not only is this something that
is real that was made in the lab,
but he has documents to prove it, but
we could argue those documents could be altered.
Right? The point is, you know, you you'd
come to your conclusion about it. What I
think is important despite the kind of couched
half conversation he had with Jones, the point
is
doctor Martin
is very clear. This was rolled out during
Trump's administration. That was just kind of not
they buried that in the conversation they had.
Or not doc doctor Martin, of course. It
was the way it was edited. My point
is, Martin is very clear.
This was rolled out all through Trump's administration,
like, the work on creating what he thinks
it was. Now you may disagree with that.
But it's important to see that he had
involvement with all of the things we're talking
about, the gain of function. I mean, I
talked about the same point. When Trump declared
the the fat Wuhan and all that with
China, when he shut down the work, guys,
I proved to you this at the time.
It became a bigger story months later when
Republican big talking heads started calling it out
when it was no longer as important.
But that when he did that,
there was, like, 6 other labs doing the
exact same research in China with the US
government.
Now he either didn't know that and he
was played, which is certainly possible, or he
played you, which is also certainly possible.
Very important, I think.
So we'll see where that ends up in
regard to the pardons, but some points you
made nonetheless.
Now, of course, we have to talk about
this stupid conversation because it is interesting, and
I do have things I wanna point out,
but I wanna be very clear. Elon Musk's
gesture has to be the least important thing
happening in the world right now.
And nonetheless, it is taking up all the
air out of the room, which I think
is I you know, I look. Let me
start out this right out of the gate
with exactly what I honestly think
my opinion completely
that this was something there's only one of
2 ways to look at his his Nazi
salute or his sending his heart, which I
just think is so stupid.
He bites his lip and he's like,
I'll show it to you. It's like, my
heart.
It just seems stupid. Like, that seems like
a very weird yeah. But maybe he's autistic,
and he's got gurbs, Asperger's, or whatever you
wanna say about it.
My genuine opinion,
and I don't think anybody knows other than
Elon Musk, is that there's only one of
few things that happened there.
Either that was a Nazi salute
because he's a Nazi, which I think is
free, outlandish
to believe, certainly possible, especially with the Zionist
influence.
Or it was done for a clear reason.
Knowing that it would get passed off by
the ADL is just a misunderstanding.
Knowing that it would be patched over by
the very people that would normally call it
a problem. So you could just go on.
But guess what it does though? It causes
a whole massive conversation,
a breakdown of every minute motion of his
arm and how it works out. Seems very
familiar, doesn't it?
That's how I would guess. I mean, because,
honestly, look. The action of doing so that
gets to get simultaneously
cast as look at the problem of Nazis
and antisemites in this country by a lot
of even the same people that support him.
At the same time, though, gets to, you
know, you get to so, basically, you get
to bolster the Zionist ADL manipulation of what
they're fighting, but then also walk it back
so you can keep supporting e Elon Musk
and you can have that relationship and still
influence them. That's I mean, that's my opinion,
and that's it. You guys can come to
your conclusions about it. But let's let's briefly
try to go through this. So first of
all, I just thought it was funny to
start with something like this. This person says,
I'd rather not entrust space travel to a
guy who does a Nazi salute.
And this guy says,
boy, do I have news for you.
It's so crazy how little people know about
their own history. Right? Project paperclip, anyone? Operation
paperclip?
I said it just struck me at the
right moment when I first read that. I
thought you had news for you. And, of
course, half the people reading this don't even
know what he's talking about. That's guys, if
you don't know the history, our government
absorbed all the Nazi scientists in a large
part of which became the actual basis
for NASA.
Von Braun and the whole thing, the boy
that was Nazi science, guys. Now it doesn't
mean that all of it and every one
of them are all inherently evil, good.
But, yeah, the point is you have to
understand that these in any circumstance, there's gonna
be people that just exist underneath that structure.
Weird, sort of like we could talk about
a Hamas dynamic in Gaza. Except in this
case, Israel funds Hamas. But anyway well, actually,
that's more accurate than you realize.
The point, getting way away from it, is
that we know that's the case. And as
well as doctor Ishii and the Japanese scientist
doing horrible biological experiments that became the basis
for the biological program. So the the history
lesson is always
is how often does the good guy
aim to stop the things they say are
evil and then instead of snuffing those things
out, make them a part of themselves. To
me, that's 2 evil things fighting over what
they want to control you with.
1 of them 1.
You can decide for yourself. But either way,
obviously, this guy doesn't know his own history.
Because what he's trying to make it out
to be is Elon Musk is a Nazi
because he made the salute, which is not
that crazy when you see it. Now what?
You'll see it right now.
So this is funny. Ian Carroll shared this.
And he he did the here's what I
think is hilarious about this.
The clip is obvious.
He does it once. Now I think this
repeats the first one twice so you can
see it. He turns around, does it to
the to the crowd,
then he turns back around and kinda halfway
does it and says, sending you my heart.
And I'll let you watch it. What I
think is hilarious
is a whole bunch of these people trying
to argue you're misunderstanding
it, weirdly seem to be sent using just
a very specifically edited clip that does something
different. So first,
he just he he says coincidence and shows
this whole back and forth, Elon. I I
don't that seems like a stretch to me
just because you called him out on that.
Obviously, Elon is without question, in my opinion,
compromised or influenced by Israel or a part
of Zionism himself.
But that's not the same as saying because
you said this, therefore. I don't know why
that connect. The point is
this is what he did.
My heart goes out to you.
Yeah. Okay. So first of all, let me
watch this again. I think that might be
just cut maybe you did it more than
once. I didn't watch the whole I didn't
watch the actual live broadcast. Thank you.
Thank you. No. Okay. It's the same one.
It just slows it down. So the first
one is repeated once a little bit slower.
But okay. I mean, this is just for
fun. I mean, because it's it's interesting, nonetheless.
In what world
do you
slap your chest, bite your lip, and go,
like,
you could literally hear him.
You could hear him. He goes, like,
and, like, and then he goes and like,
you know, it's clearly like, I'm not trying
to overthink it. I just think it's funny
that you you're aggressively
twice saying I send you my heart.
Seems silly to me. Watch it again.
And look. And I'll I'll add one more
thing.
I mean, okay, and just so you can
see it. I mean, what what what world
do you send my heart to you
and then go,
which is watch it. Look at it. His
hand is straight out. Now, see, this is
my point. I don't believe he's doing a
Nazi salute. I just don't think that makes
sense. I mean, in the sense that he's
a Nazi.
I don't know how you look at that
and not think he did that to get
a reaction for some reason, whether because of
a agenda or just because he wants to
troll the left. That's what they all like
to talk about. Right? That's what it seems
like to me. To I mean, I really
do think it's pretty silly to argue based
on that, you just think he's a Nazi.
Guys, we're talking about a Nazi party. Like,
that's not the same thing as calling him
a racist. It seems to be another partisan
that's why I think what we're seeing is
some kind of weird manipulation.
You can decide for yourself, but I just
think it's kind of crazy to see him
so aggressively do that and then, like, point
his hand and then do the same. I
mean, watch again and we'll we'll leave it
there.
Look at his hand. Are you really gonna
tell me that's sending out your heart? That's
just as stupid as saying he did a
Nazi salute because he's a Nazi, in my
opinion. Just giving you my thoughts.
Here.
Good work at Brian.
Thank you. My heart goes out to you.
Now in in in fairness, he turns around
and does it softer. Maybe he realized that
he did. He's like, oh, that felt wrong.
I I don't know. I it just seems
like such a stupid thing, but I'll tell
you, it sure as hell gotten a lot
of attention.
Now I just said, that's just wild. He
does it very aggressively for his heart, but
I find it really hard to believe that
it's something he would do even if he
was a Nazi. Right? A genuine Nazi, which
I don't think. But damn if that's pretty
hard to ignore. What do you think? And
it got a lot of engagement.
Eighty 2 people who want you know, a
lot of people just it's all over the
place, really. People something he's a Nazi.
Seems crazy.
So here's what he said. And, well, here
first of all, here's what he tweeted in
the rabbit hole shared. The salute the salute
hoax, it says, is just another part of
the dirty tricks campaign. Now what exactly is
a trick here?
He did it.
So them calling it a Nazi salute, which,
by the way, literally is that. You could
argue you didn't mean it that way. So
what exactly is a trick? You see where
this this begins to start to look like
something very, very meant to cause this conversation.
And he goes, in the past, I voted
Democrat because they were mostly the Kindness Party,
but they have become the party of division
and hate. So I can no longer support
them, and I vote Republican, which means it's
stupid. That means you have no principles.
They're not just the same thing with a
different hat, guys. They have stated very different
principles. So for you to just jump sides
shows you that you're a follower, that you
don't have anything that means anything. But
just another dirty tricks campaign. He goes, now
watch their dirty tricks campaign against me. That's
where that comes from.
And he goes, frankly, they never they need
better dirty tricks. He just good. That works
for me. I'll share that.
The everyone is Hitler attack is so tired.
I agree.
Pretty sure nobody said I mean, well, I
shouldn't say that. I'm sure a lot of
idiots called him Hitler. But that's not what
it's about.
Is it strange? Right? I mean, he did
the thing. He saluted. He put his hands
straight out. So anybody's gonna look at that
and say, well, that looks exactly like an
aussie salute. But an honest person's gonna say,
it's certainly possible he didn't mean it that
way. And, yes, I'll get to the examples
of other people doing it because that seems
to be all the rage right now.
Autism Capital, who's just like this Elon lackey
who just loves to be everything he does.
It's, you know, because he gets shared up
by Elon.
Says, oh, man. The Internet's gonna love this
one. Get ready for the news cycle.
Now it's interesting that you're literally I mean,
it's the image itself.
It's become important. Now here's what's funny.
This person says, it's the Roman salute. You're
right. Legacy medial pretend he didn't cover his
heart first, and that's an important factor.
Okay?
Do you realize where the Nazis got it
from? Right? Like, they that's the Roman salute
is what the not that's what the Nazis
call it. That's what it is. It's the
same damn thing. And, yes, if you watch
a Nazi do it, they do the same
thing.
And different variations amongst them the same way
in some cases you find people a little
bit out of service, salute a little differently,
despite that being a pretty intense topic. The
point
is this is funny to me seeing as
how it's like, well, you just said the
same thing. You just pretend that, no, it's
the Roman version.
Okay. Does it look exactly the same? So
what are you talking about?
So
Doge Designer,
you're always jumping to sis save him even
though you don't know what he means. You
don't know what he thought. You are believing
he did it because he said so. Right?
So an honest person would say, I believe
him because he said that. Not that, you're
wrong. You know it's this and you're wrong.
That's the kind of blind partisan fantasy that
we have in the partisanship.
It's you're at an Elvis concert, guys. You
are screaming because you want his you want
him you're throwing his underwear at him while
he's on stage. That's the equivalent of what
I'm seeing right now. People going, you're wrong,
and I know him because he's my best
friend. Well, it says the media was the
media's misleading you. Elon Musk never did a
Nazi salute. Yeah, guys. He literally did. Again,
it's it's debatable in the con or the
perception.
Maybe he didn't mean that. Maybe he did
it because he was throwing his heart to
the crowd.
If it looks identical to a Nazi salute,
well, then he did a Nazi salute. He
just didn't mean to do what you see
what I'm saying? It's like a I'm trying
to think about equivalent.
I don't know. It doesn't even matter. The
point is if it's the same exact dynamic,
then it's an open to interpretation. Right?
So he's lying about that. But they're this
is about them trying to make it about
how he's being it's the game because the
Democrats are fighting their well, that didn't play
out though. If the Democrats are all hell
bent on stopping them, then why didn't they
do anything to stop them? But it says,
watch the full video. He simply gestured and
said thank you. Oh, the full video, is
it?
Funny how it doesn't look like the full
video to me. And I just wanna say
thank you
for making it happen.
Thank you.
My heart goes out to
you. It is That's a bit different, isn't
it? Seeing as how you missed the other
time he does it before saying that. I
mean, guys, I don't that's not by accident.
Unless I'm wrong, I don't find that clip
anywhere. I think somebody made that clip.
Certainly could be a clip from some show
somewhere that cut away right at the moment,
which is interesting.
But it that's silly to me.
He did it right out in front, did
it in the back, came back out and
said sending in my heart. I still am
arguing. I don't think he did this because
he's a Nazi.
I just think it's pretty silly that these
people go so far out of their way
to basically lie to you.
Don't trust your lying eyes.
Silly.
Another example.
But, you know, it's like the whole game.
Like, if you when you got friends like
Ben Shapiro who
who who who needs enemies. Right? But it
says Ben Shapiro
tagging PBS who says billionaire Elon Musk gave
what appeared to be a fascist salute, didn't
go to Nazis, it was fascist salute, while
making a speech. How is that even re
that did appear to be a salute? You
could argue he didn't mean it, but I'm
not trying to side with corporate media. That's
just objectively what we're looking at.
And they and he doesn't like that. So
he goes, yours
you stupid effing idiots. And then shows a
picture of them standing together.
Right. Because you being there proves he's not
a Nazi. Right? Moron. Because you're totally not
with a Zionist genocidal entity that literally worked
with Nazism during the Final Solution, which is
on Wikipedia.
These guys are such clowns and I think
they're very I I think people like Ben
Shapiro are desperate, and same with Alex by
the way, because they're being seen through by
their own audiences right now because of logical
inconsistencies
that a child could see. But don't worry
because they they're together and they're both best
friends with Net and Yahoo, so you're wrong.
Yeah. Somebody's an effing idiot for sure.
Well, guess what? Piers Morgan steps in because
now we know for sure because Piers Morgan
knows. Right? He's a trustworthy character.
Isn't it funny how there all these Democrats
side you know,
a lot of them are stepping it's just
there's a lot of them that go, I'm
pretty critical of him, but there's no way.
Here's what Piers Morgan said. Without having any
idea what he actually thinks or what is
in Elon's head, He says, Elon Musk was
very ill advised to do this kind of
salute, to denote he he he's clearly stated
my heart goes out to you sentiment.
Well, it was clearly stated after 2 times
of doing it first,
so that's a bit different. But he goes,
he obviously didn't mean it as a Nazi
salute. Anyone says he did being a disingenuous
idiot.
Okay. Part of that I'm saying, I don't
think it makes sense to say it's a
Nazi salute, but
but he obviously didn't mean that. See, that's
the kind of stupidity you get from partisan
media and from corporate media. Oh, you know
what he thinks? You know what he feels?
He obviously didn't mean that. That's stupid.
That's deserving of ridicule. I have no idea
what he thinks and feels, but I'm just
telling you my opinion, which is that I
don't think that makes sense.
That's objectivity.
But Piers Morgan is on his side. Right?
Does that make sense? Right? The lefty media
empire is totally supporting Elon Musk? Or how
about the ADL?
You know, the ADL that's partnered with Twitter,
with the Yacarino World Economic Forum, fighting against
the rebel deep state. Right, guys?
Well, ADL steps in to defend him because
that makes sense. Right? Now how often do
you see a guy give an identical Nazi
salute, whether he meant it or not, on
a world stage with a presidency that's getting
called not racist, basically?
A group a presidency, by the way, that
the ADL itself has called racist in the
past.
Nothing but open opportunity if what they are
is what we know they are. They'll take
every opportunity,
except
it says, this is a delicate moment. Oh,
is it a delicate moment? I just love
the words. This is delicate. What's what the
f is delicate about it? The fact that
he I mean, think about how a weird
way to start that is. It says, it's
a new day, And yet so many are
on edge. Oh, thank you, ADL. You as
you've created division and sewn chaos and censored
Americans, you care that we're on edge? He
says our po our politics are inflamed. Our
politics? Yeah. And social media only adds to
the anxiety.
It seems that Elon Musk made an awkward
gesture in a moment of enthusiasm.
Not a Nazi salute. But, again, we appreciate
that people are on edge. Oh, so you
like that we're on edge? Well, I guess
I misread the the
somber tone that it's a problem, except we
love that you're doing that because that works
for us. Like, they can't even hide who
they are when they're trying to pretend that
they've I mean, these people are gross across
the board, guys. And we already showed you
what they are. We just talked about it.
He says, we appreciate people on edge. In
this moment, all sides should give one another
a bit of grace, perhaps even the benefit
of the doubt and take a breath. This
is a new beginning. Let's hope for healing
and work toward unity in the months years.
And you know what? Yes. It's nice words.
And I love to believe they mean them,
except for the fact that they what they
just did there is never been afforded to
a single person holding a Palestinian flag since
the moment they started doing this.
Not once. They are actively telling you that
all of them are racist. That's the racist
cloud they're telling you about. But, of course,
Elon Musk actually does a salute, not wearing
a flag or a kifa that's not Nazi
related, even ideologically
speaking,
but actually doing that, even if he meant
that or not, and that's the way he
respond. Come on.
These people are embarrassing. And that's what I
think I wanna highlight in all of this.
Elon Musk goes, thanks, guys.
Don't forget that they're partnered with
Twitter, and we just heard him tell you.
He can alter algorithms.
We just saw that happen.
They also go on to say, in an
interesting timing,
we unequivocally condemn
president Trump,
which is interesting, isn't it?
Says we unequivocally
condemn
Donald Trump's issuance of 1500 pardons and commuted
sentences for January 6th insurrectionists
insurrectionists.
Isn't that funny? So I tell you guys,
the whole point from the beginning was that
they have always been calling you racist. The
very group that you think you're supporting
That's not just January 6ers. They have made
their entire time that anyone wearing a red
hat, that's labeled on their website.
So here we are where they're telling you
that all of those people that were framed
by a Zionist Israeli government CIA
that's what this was. Alright. Grab it.
Just the one.
Because it's the crew. It's the truth. And
I think it's transparent.
January 6th was always a very clear government
operation. The evidence I think is undeniable overlaps
with this Azov movement, with Israel, with the
n t it's very clear.
You can decide. Don't just take my word
for it. My point though is that these
people were taken advantage of.
And the ADL who wants to tell you
that that wasn't a Nazi salute, who's gonna
support them out or what? Even though they're
casting anybody out who even looks funny at
you know, who sides with Palestine.
That these people are extremists.
I just hope that shows you something when
it comes to the Republicans and where you
and, I mean, let's put it this way,
the honest conservatives and what side you think
you're on because they're not on your side.
They also then say later in the day,
congratulations,
Donald Trump and Vance on your inauguration today.
Just wanna point out because they're real happy
about it.
Now, cue Anthony, alay alay says, honestly, I
this is Adl's tweet. Honestly, I'm not even
upset. I'm just glad we never have to
talk about the fine contours of anti semitism
ever again. Right?
Is this going forward? You can just post
this screenshot and tell every Zionist for the
foreseeable future to kiss your ASS. The point
being is if you're gonna be like, let's
just again, let's just give them grace and
give them benefit of the doubt. Oh, is
that what you did for everybody else?
Take a breath?
No. You guys literally framed innocent people for
things that got them fired from their jobs.
But, of course, when it works for you
see, they're not honest.
So his point is what you're seeing is
bull rank hypocrisy.
Greg Soaker, you guys know? Anti Defamation League
on Elon Musk, not a Nazi salute. He
says, makes sense. Since Zionism and Nazism have
historically worked quite well together, both projects have
served each other well. Now I'm gonna do
a focus on that in a minute. You
guys have known after I'll I'll actually include
the article we did by the show.
We've talked about it a lot. It's it's
it's objectively the case.
And I mean that in the sense that
this is at least what's been reported. And
I'll also show you
the one of the tweets I referenced just
because it includes source material, which you can
read about.
This is Haraz. Actually, I forgot that I
didn't oh, dang it.
I'll come back to it. I'm gonna focus
on this in a minute. I did I
have a old tweet that I just shared
about this. In this article itself, it tells
you they worked with the Nazis.
They literally aligned themselves with this, and this
is what Dan Cohen writes, that Lehi continued
Lehi party being Zionism.
They they were seeking to allo with Nazi
Germany even after the final solution. There's quote
in the Harvard article that says, even if
it's Germany, as long as we get what
we want. Paraphrasing.
That's the reality. I did the show right
here. Zionism versus Nazism. Israel's connection to extremist
ideology, ADL's history of faking Nazi marches.
It's contentious because of the lies around this
story.
Include that for you.
So
both projects have served each other right well.
That's what I was talking about. The idea
of of putting that out to justify
its own existence.
I interview with Dan Cohen about this.
Journalist, Jewish person himself,
calls out Zionism,
the manufactured Israeli plight or Middle East plight,
and the Zionism linchpin.
Very manufactured.
This one too.
So this person says, let me get this
straight. And this is a person responding to
me. As a person with a track record
of being critical of Elon Musk, I feel
extremely confident asserting this was not a salute.
I just I'm so tired of this. Good.
So you think that. And, I mean, that's
fine. But put out your opinion. But I
just don't know why it matters. Are you
critical or not? Like, that's all an opinion,
which seems pretty irrelevant to me because we
don't know what's in his mind. But he
says, let me get this straight.
Zionists told us, saying Palestinian made us Nazis.
Wearing a kifa made us Nazis. Marching for
peace made us Nazis, calling for ceasefire made
us Nazis, talking about murdering children
Israel murdering children made us Nazis, but are
now saying a Nazi salute is just exuberantly
throwing his heart to the crowd. You know?
It's dumb. That's not even whether he meant
it like that or not. It's the way
that these people would jump at anything that
would be called the because Palestinian bad and
don't take this. The there's no way that
would make sense unless this was organized. That's
my opinion.
Max Blumenthal says, Elon and the ADL in
a a play in 4 acts.
This is from September 2023.
Musk threatens to sue ADL for 1,000,000,000 blaming
US Jewish Group for x revenue drop.
Okay.
Oh, and then they invite them to go
to Israel and they fake a whole thing,
which remember that got proven in real time
to be fake. There were bullets that were
not shot. There were literally bolts in the
casings down there. They turned out to be
all sorts of fakes. They staged a lot
of these things they showed people.
In case that irritates you or makes you
offended. That's a provable fact. Even her rats
broke these things down, but Elon Musk, of
course, with his baby version of a, of
a bulletproof vest
gets brought out.
Does the tour
comes back, ever changed?
At least that's what we're being told.
Then he gives a Nazi salute or whatever
you wanna call that.
ADL comes out and says, give him give
him a break.
Interesting.
Now don't forget, on top of it all,
Christopher Wray and Jonathan Greenblatt are very, very
clear. And same with,
Comey from the past.
Very, very clear
that the ADL trains every FBI agent. That's
what they say with their own mouth.
Doesn't that seem a bit concerning with all
that we're talking about?
Should.
Almost weekly basis,
our team at the ADL Center on Extremism
is in touch with the Federal Bureau of
Investigation,
sharing information
and helping the brave,
patriotic men and women of the FBI
disrupt violence before it happens. Ladies and gentlemen,
it is my honor to introduce to you
today
our friend,
our ally,
and our partner, the director of the FBI,
Christopher Wray. We wanna thank the ADL today
for your support in conducting
the training that all of our new special
agents and intelligence analysts participate in. We've been
such great partners in fighting to stamp out
the recent uptick in hate crimes. In fighting
to stamp out the recent uptick in hate
crimes in the US. Your work
reminds
our young people what's at stake. Why we
all,
particularly those of us in law enforcement,
must aggressively
counter anti Semitic violence everywhere
it appears.
ADL works
more closely with law enforcement than any other
private organization,
and the law enforcement agency
with which we have worked the longest
and the most extensively is the FBI.
Since 2000,
the FBI has required every new agent to
participate
in law enforcement and society,
LEAS.
That's a training program on core values created
by ADL
and the US Holocaust Memorial Museum. Mister Comey
reaffirm the bureau's commitment to this unique program.
I'll leave it there. It's, like, another 2,
3 minutes. But the point is that that's
proudly being stated.
I mean, you know, one of these things
here and there, you might be able to
find a reason, but overlapping with everything we
constantly talk about, the infiltration, the Zionist cabinet.
I mean, it's it's alarming to me that
there are people who can't at least acknowledge
how crazy that is.
But, of course, if there was any brown
person, there was a China discussion, any indication
would be stopping
records record screech. Right? The whole thing stops.
The evidence around this is so wildly clear.
So going forward,
I wanted to at least play 1. This
is just on top of all of it
as we oh, I think that was Sarah
put at the end. I'll come back to
it. This is just this weird, weird clip
that I just wanna share since we're talking
about things that I find to be largely
unimportant to the larger conversation. Before we get
to it, I think it's relevant that we
see people in the community.
This is Haratz.
Whether it's Israeli, Jewish communities, you know, the
overlap of both,
which is funny because realize there are more
than Jewish people that live in Israel, by
the way, which is just funny how that
never gets discussed.
Here's horets. Is George Soros behind your awkward
salute too? I think
they got a that's they got him right
there. Think about that. They're constantly talking about,
oh, George Soros is, you know, playing basically
trying to hide a lot of things he
does that I argue as well would be
considered racist or bigoted.
Because they argue with some kind of which
I'm not even for a second dismissing the
idea of the weaponized aspect of it.
But what's hilarious is that this,
you know,
they have a right to call it out.
It's funny how the ADL is going, give
him a pass and you got this Israeli
organization saying that's a problem.
Here
is Torah Judaism.
This is an Orthodox Jewish organization that's saying,
is that a Nazi salute, Elon Musk?
Interesting.
Thank you for what you will.
The Lemkin Institute
For Genocide Prevention
is horrified, they say, to see issuing a
red flag alert for the United States of
America on the very first day of the
second term of Trump's
I mean, I this is not meant to
be taken as a as a joke.
The Lemkin Institute For Genocide Prevention is,
as I can tell, very serious.
They pointed this out during the gen the
ongoingly so, but in in the genocide in
Gaza.
And so they're simply saying that it's considered
a red flag to see that kind of
a gesture from a powerful government. I mean,
it's not that as much as this is
being buried in partisan nonsense, that's not something
to be ignored. But I would say watch
as it goes forward. Whether or not they
do a stupid salute, watch for examples
of authoritarianism
for you know? But all they're saying is
that's a that's a red flag. It says,
however, Elon Musk's clear use of Nazi salute
twice during his speech has given us no
other choice. The use of the anti Semitic
genocidal signal by the world's most powerful man
who has engaged in racism and anti Semitism
past cannot be taken lightly or written off
as a mistake.
Now, again, I I don't you I already
went through my points. You know my opinion.
I still think it's relevant that they think
that think that way. Let's not also ignore
the possibility that there's political act
interests
guiding that. No matter where it is in
the world, that's always possible.
Here's another one. I thought they're worthy including.
I mean, just because people wanna talk about
it. This guy's saying I you know, he's
a journalist, a writer. He's saying, I studied
the Nazis at university. I taught the history
of Nazi Germany on 2 continents and wrote
for major newspapers about Nazi Germany. And I
am the Internet famous for fact checking
people on history, ideology, and he says this
was a Nazi slur. So, again, it's like,
I know it looks that my point is
you don't know what he thought when he
did it. So that's the only thing that
matters to me is that these people are
saying based on the metrics and where his
arm was. Well, yeah. I agree. I think
anybody with a brain can see that. It
was exactly what you would think. So comes
down to what he actually meant. So no
one else will know that. So you're gonna
get partisan division.
But here's where it gets even more interesting.
Elon Musk, of course, lives at TikTok jumping
in to defend Elon because that's what they're
paid for. Says, can somebody direct me to
the articles where the media expressed outrage over
this?
Somewhat of fair point until you look into
them and realize that basically every single one
of those examples, I'll show you, were not
this. Right?
Now, love, someone's gonna crop that out. Right?
I guarantee that'll happen. The point though is
it was just like a I'm on the
microphone and I'm like, you know,
which who knows? Same point. Maybe they meant
that as
raising your arm. Alright. Or, like, raise the
volume or taking the volume down. Or maybe
they meant it as an Nazi salute.
The point is obviously that that doesn't make
much sense
to just jump to conclusions. But what's interesting
is you have a better example of somebody
with the heart part and the whole overlap
first that gets dismissed, but then you've got
go out of your way to find examples
of people, and I'll show you right now.
It's funny. I'm thinking about that. I guarantee
someone's gonna do that.
This
right here. So here is
Obama, first of all.
So
just okay. Feel
do yourself a favor and do your own
due diligence,
especially if you think I'm sorry. Some partisan
manipulator. I'm questioning everything. My point though is
that this I'm no supporter of Obama. I
was holding him I was criticizing him like
crazy during his administration, like all the rest
of them because I don't trust any of
them. My point though is that I've never
seen Obama do an actual Nazi salute. I've
seen him raise his hand like that plenty
of times. He does it all the time
when he's talking. So my point is if
we're gonna make out one versus the other,
and you're gonna say these, they're not they're
not equivalent. They're just not. They're not the
same thing.
And you can see as he's talking, he
does that a lot. This is the same
area. He's raising his hand. He's talking about
maybe maybe he's a Nazi. I would put
just as much consideration as I did with
Elon Musk, except that Elon's was identical with
the Nazi salute.
Same with Clinton. Are we really gonna pretend
that's her not making a point about, you
know or like this.
This is one of the ones where they
say the Hillary salute. Well, watch it.
What is she doing? She's holding the microphone.
She's trying to say quiet.
Quiet.
Hold on.
I hate Hillary Clinton. I think she's an
absolute monster, but I can still be honest
enough to recognize that or this as her
talking to congress and holding it. Come on,
guys. Are we really just that simple that
somebody could break down a bunch of hands
in the ear clips?
That's how easily people get played.
So when we have him doing it and
all of a sudden, all you do is
show a bunch of other examples of people
doing something similar, but not slapping their heart
in the chat, doing it twice in a
row and turning around. You get my point.
It's just so lazy. I'm just so I'm
increasingly getting so impatient and tired with the
same childish nonsense from all of these same
people.
If, I mean, if you wanna make it
out to be they could be Nazis, then
good. I can back that. Maybe they're both
Nazis. But if you wanna pretend one is
more than the other because you don't obviously,
the one who did the more clear, I
don't think either of them are.
But see, only one side could be honest
about that. That's the side that does not
have a partisan investment.
Kills me.
Now this is what I just think is
weird.
Just because we're talking about meaningless stories right
now. This is,
you know, I I do want my opinion.
I think he's on drugs. He does love
Ketamine. He says
The bible that was given to her husband
by his mother
and the one that was used by the
bible that was given to her husband
by his mother. I mean, how else do
you explain that, guys?
Anybody's
that is weird. Or he's a lizard man.
You guys can decide for yourself. I mean,
god, that's weird. I just think it's weird,
you know, the way this person,
I think a lot of these people are
are it's it's similar with it's like we've
talked about before. You got a lot of
people that are gaining a lot of power
that I don't think are necessarily earning that
power.
And I kinda think that's where we are
with a lot of the stuff we're seeing
today. I don't think these people are really
the ones making shot calling shots.
I think that's becoming a more and more
popular opinion.
But isn't that weird?
I just that's a creepy image we see
right there. Now,
Disclosed TV, just in. Senate confirms Marco Rubio
as secretary of state in 99 to 0
votes. And as somebody points out here, it's
a squirrel. Bernie Sanders voted to confirm genocidal
Zionist NeoCon warmonger Marco Rubio.
That lines up with Bernie Sanders' fake rhetoric,
doesn't it?
The point is 99 to 0.
Okay?
Let's not pretend for one second that we
don't have just one government here, guys. It's
quite obvious that this is about a long
term plan, and I'm just so tired of
trying I mean, I don't even know if
everyone in that room knows that, but they
all have their influences, their strings, their APAC
guy. They're being controlled.
Let's just stop mincing words about this. Marco
Rubio is not unanimously supported by anybody,
but apparently the US government,
who, in other words, pretends that he's, you
know, in all the other partisan games.
This gets really embarrassing. So this is Huckabee.
These are this is one of the other
he was supposed to be the ambassador to
Israel, if you can believe that, which is
exactly what I said would be the case.
That you this is a person who's in
a rabid Zionist, prophetic and otherwise, who is
going to argue the lies Brad Israel
in regard to an ambassador to Israel. So
you're you're not going to be fighting for
anything other than Israeli interest for as an
American ambassador.
But as Patrick says, huge fail by Trump
here, which I don't think it was. I
think it was deliberate.
His new ambassador to Israel, Huckabee, apparently has
the brain of an 11 year old. Lacks
even high school level knowledge history and geography
of Israel and Palestine, or is being paid
or influenced or controlled or blackmailed to literally
say the classic not Israeli Zionist lies about
Israel.
The lie. Every one of them. He says,
we have to admit I'll I'll I'll let
you I'll play it. He says on Fox
host, that is meant to is meant, Fox
host this guy, what's his name? Brian Killemied,
is meant to be a historian, yet doesn't
is meant to be, but doesn't push back
on any of it. Why? Because it's all
pro Israel.
That's my opinion, but I think it's pretty
transparent.
Listen to this, and I'm gonna try my
best not to stop it.
Do you believe
that president Trump believes, and you do believe,
that the 2 state solution is the future?
No. I I think we have to recognize
there was a Palestinian state. It was called
Gaza.
Look how that turned out.
You can't have a Palestinian state on top
of the Israeli state if the Palestinians continue
to believe that Israel shouldn't exist because the
Palestinians don't believe in a 2 state solution.
They believe in a 1 state solution, and
there's a solution, and Israel disappears.
That's no solution whatsoever. Israel has a right
to its,
autonomous
indigenous homeland that they've had for 35 100
years since the days of Abraham. My god.
You see, there's your prophecy there there is
your Israeli extremist prophetic view coming through 35
100 years ago. You know how easily you
can prove that's not true?
Like, in the context of all the we've
this at the very least, first of all,
historically, that's simply a lie. Secondarily,
you can very clearly prove well before 1948
that that was not the case. So if
we're gonna start saying 35 100 years ago
I was there, you have to move, then
this is a pretty ridiculous place. But that's
not the game. We know it's a lie.
We also know this guy is either this
stupid or is deliberately lying for Israeli interest
at the expense of both Americans and Palestinians.
I don't think he cares.
They had a Palestinian state. Like, is is
any child in the room unaware that that
was an occupied territory according to the United
Nations to this very moment? That they controlled
the water, the air, the telecommunications?
Yes. Despite the screaming, it's rarely lies like
everything else we've heard.
We know that's the case. So he either
doesn't know that, which is terrifying,
or he's lying,
which is pretty common
in the Israeli influenced government we have. This
is supposed to be the ambassador to Israel.
Do you think he's gonna pull back on
the genocide
or Trump if you're putting this person in
place?
Greg says, unbelievable. The Foggy Bottom folks, it
seems, have not schooled the new ambassador
well on his gig, or more likely he
didn't bother reading the briefing memo.
It says, what goes once said, there is
nothing more frightening than active ignorance. Mister Huckabee
is a poster boy. Well said.
Sad.
Now Ashrafran Ratzani Ratzani from going underground points
out Israel's Knesset has approved a bill, criminalizing
denial of Israel's version of events on October
7th.
So you see where this is coming from.
You're not allowed to talk about the history
anymore. This is this guys, you have to
realize we've done entire shows about this. Even
Times of Israel and Aretes have written about
it. Israel has a censor on its history.
You're not allowed to write about these things.
You're not allowed you know why? Because they
and it's it's stated in the law Because
it will show people what they've done. It
it hurts them to show you that they
murdered and raped and pillaged and still have
to this day. Now, same point. Now you're
gonna make it illegal to talk about what
they just did because we all know and
they know we know and it's gonna be
another forceful effort over the next 20 years
to bury this and the threats of antisemitism.
And and if it works like last time,
it'll happen. But I don't think they can.
I don't I don't think they can put
this away anymore.
But here we are.
Says those who break this law can face
5 years in prison.
What is Israel's version of events?
The it says that the militia of an
open air concentration camp with nothing but light
arms caused this level of destruction on October
7th.
We know that's not true. Even Harrettes proved
this. These are cars that they moved to
the side after they bombed them with Apache
helicopters,
many of which were full of hostages that
they then covered up.
That's a factual story.
Again, covered even by Israeli media. I don't
even know why I need to preface that
anymore. I think the people that are pushing
back on this already know that they're lying.
But it says
oh, it's right here.
Thanks to the brave reporting from the independent
media in the west and some Israeli journalists,
we know that the Israel implemented the Hannibal
directive. And that was ordered. That's not a
looks like. It's ordered and been has now
been confirmed to have been ordered, which means
they killed their own people to stop them
from being used against them as hostages.
Where Israeli helicopter gunships unloaded their bullets and
rockets on anything that moved in a mass
application of the directive to prevent Israelis from
being taken hostage by Hamas, who would then
be used against them. Now to be clear,
it's not just about maybe hitting them with
the cars. They knowingly killed hostages. That has
been reported in the house that they burned
down by Yasmin Porat, by hostage they killed
in the middle of Gaza, point blank murder,
twice in a row, 1:50 minutes later.
All this has been covered.
It says the now debunked mass rape claims
are also now enshrined in law, meaning questioning
these debunked claims or even saying they don't
have not been debunked
could land you in prison in Israel.
That is what your government supports. That's what
Trump supports. That's what his entire Zionist cabinet
blindly supports at your expense.
Get ready for your future.
Now in the ceasefire,
if you haven't already paid attention, we talked
about this from the beginning. This was on
the 15th January.
The title,
Trump's missing ethics pledges, which matters with everything
we just discussed, but the new ceasefire agreement
is real already plans to break.
Now we knew this because it was reported
by their own media and people in their
own Knesset that were saying, we're gonna do
that by the 2nd pay. Well, guess what?
They broke it immediately.
Day 1, they shot a child. More than
1.
Nobody cared. Just like they didn't care in
in Lebanon because the game is to pretend
like we're because this is important to your
whatever government you think you have in this
country. Certainly does not appear to be a
UN United States government is clearly in line
with allowing that to continue.
Sadly enough, that appears to be the case.
I followed up on the 18th.
Trump's rebel narrative completely collapses, and the secret
sabotage deal behind the Gaza ceasefire.
Of course, Robert covered on 16th the Gaza
ceasefire, a US Israel defeat or another trick.
Make sure you check up on it. He's
writing an article now, by the way. And
I'll give a shout out to, Of Guardian,
who is a part of the Independent Media
Alliance.
And they they're they're show they were right.
They says we called it. Israel got a
cease fire. And they're simply this is, Kit
Knightley, simply highlighting what they predicted in their
kind of prediction for 2025. And one of
them, the incoming Trump administration will be trying
to score peacemaker points with a deal in
Ukraine that could extend to the Israel Gaza
too. A negotiated release of all hostages is
also possible. My point though is that ultimately
has led to a complete and obvious violation
of what this was supposed to be at
the expense. So trying to score peacemaker points
and not even accomplishing anything.
That's say I think that's what we are
seeing across the board.
Now Ryan Raspiani points out,
same point we keep talking about. Like, I
don't care if this went as a forever
ceasefire. I mean, I do. But my point
is in this point,
where are they supposed to go?
30,000 orphans.
30,000.
That's 30000.
What do they return to?
Who do they return to?
30,000 children, some of which are in their
toddlers.
They no longer don't they don't have a
house. That's gone. God's is gone.
They don't even have a family to go
back to.
So it when you have people out there
that are literally but, I mean, outside from
the aid, we'll get to in a second,
before this, who are still it takes more
than one massive insurgent of was rush of
food to stop us to stop starvation.
Famine, especially.
My point though is that you have people
that are struggling in that way, Who are
being let back in. They don't they have
no homes to go back to. They don't
know what to do. They're saying that.
What do you think that you think they're
all everyone hopefully will do their best to
take care of some of these children? These
kids are gonna die. There's nothing they can
do unless we do something to stop this
from continuing.
Candace Owens, showing other images we thought we
showed in the in the for the title
today.
This person,
she highlights this one, which is I don't
think this one's from recently.
It says Gaza. Unreal. Absolutely unreal. What humanity
is allowing to happen here.
It's crazy. And he simply goes and someone
see, some people, because of the algorithmic manipulation,
never see this stuff. 4,600,000
views just on his because she shared it.
But the point is, he goes, is this
even a real photo?
Like, how is it possible that we haven't
seen these things by now? The point is
there's people online that look, they still just
don't see it. Or that don't ever see
our tweets ever again unless it's supposed to.
And she goes, yeah. Here's three more. Was
not a military response. This was a planned
annihilation.
Netanyahu was caught on camera before October 7th
spelling out his plans for the Palestinians.
Samira points out footage of skulls and decomposed
rib cages and femurs and and feet are
now coming out of Gaza.
Make no mistake why Israel isn't allowing international
journalists to enter. It has nothing to do
with security.
Deep, deep, decent news
points out what Trump had to say.
The I told you so. It just doesn't
seem to cut it.
Sir, do you press then that you can
keep the ceasefire in Gaza
and conclude the 3 phases of this deal?
I'm not confident. This is not our words.
They're a word, but
I'm not confident. It's not our words. It's
our word.
I just it I'm it makes me sick.
The smug disregard for everything that you to
you. We're gonna stop it on day 1,
is what you told everybody. Now, it's the
smug. I don't know. It's not even mine.
I don't know.
I mean, really?
And you know I mean, look. There's always
it's always one more thing for me. But
to me, it's like right there. How do
you not see this bought off player?
You're real you're gonna you're gonna so what
about Ross? How about what happened there? Oh,
these promises. Not even a nod to why
it didn't happen. That's not our thing.
Yeah. It is, though. It literally is a
US government war. But you see, you guys
love to pretend like this is different. This
is the Republican side. So no. You're still
the government even as much as you pretend
you're 2 separate sides, which I don't even
agree with that,
even though you're still part of the US
government. Yes. This is your war. Yes. There
are still people involved. There are military people
on the ground right now, and you're gonna
pretend it's not your war. Americans are fighting
on the side of Israel right now. A
general a 3 star general's been on the
ground from the beginning.
He knows all of this or he's terrifyingly
uninformed, but it's not our war.
Yeah. You've been funding them. You've been arming
them. You're you've been stopping aid.
God, it makes me so angry
that everybody can't see how cowardly that is.
Suppress then that you can keep the ceasefire
in Gaza
and conclude the 3 phases of this deal.
I'm not confident. That's not our words. They're
a word, but Apologize. I'm not confident, but
I think they're very weakened on the other
side. It's because he knows he's already let
Netanyahu continue.
So that's not my thing. I don't know.
Talk about something else. Let them do what
we let them do. Genocide continuing.
Do you support the Tuesday Gaza boy. I
looked at a picture of Gaza. Gaza is
is like a massive demolition site. That place
is
Yeah. It's really
gotta be rebuilt in a different way. Oh,
yeah.
Yeah. Like like a just a a a
demolition, almost like a land grab and and
reimagining it. Funny.
You know what group has been screaming about
that in every single story we've seen up
until this one that suddenly there's no comment?
Yeah. You damn well know who I'm talking
about. All the different story which so I
wouldn't dismiss any of them. But funny how
the group that can't stop making that argument
doesn't call it out here.
What about the smart city dynamic? Isn't that
what they already told us they would do
in Gaza? Yes. They've already shown you the
plan.
Amazing how he can adore something like that
or every other aspect of the great reset
or the North American Union, and we still
pretend like we're on track to fight to
deep state.
Do you venture help rebooting Gaza? I might.
You know, Gaza is interesting. It's a phenomenal
location. Yeah. Just like Jared Kusher told us.
Lots of beachfront property as soon as we
get all these bad guys out of the
way. Right? Meaning, all Palestinians,
which is what they're telling you.
It's destroyed. It's gone. Flattened.
So, oh, I guess we gotta do something.
Right? We can't just do nothing. We gotta
step in and help. Which means, get them
all out of the way. We gotta give
them somewhere to go. They don't want to
leave.
I'm telling you. There right now, there are
people
pie together on the streets with nowhere to
go going, we won.
We have nothing left. Our houses are gone,
but we won because the world was fighting
us, and we're still here.
I'm telling you guys, this is not going
away. They're going to keep genocide in these
people because they are the most resilient people
on the planet as far as I could
tell, and they are gonna keep fighting.
But he wants you to kinda blithely dismiss
this like it's never gonna go anywhere. Ah,
it's their thing. Don't worry about it.
On the sea,
best weather. You know, everything's good. It's like
Oh, my god. He just said that.
Everything's good. You know, other than starving to
death and your children dying of disease and
have their arms blown off. All good though,
because they know the weather's nice. Unless it's
raining and you have a tent that's 500
degrees inside.
And just this guy puts his foot in
his mouth so often when he's actually on
the cuff, off the cuff. Some beautiful things
could be done with it, but
it's very interesting.
But some fantastic things could be done with
Gaza.
God. Future in governance for the Why do
we think we have any say in what
happened? Aren't we being told that's their place?
Palestinians, like, didn't they just tell us they
had a state? That was Gaza? Why do
you think you have any right to tell
me? Oh, that's right. Because they don't have
an insight or a say on what happens
in their supposed country and never have.
Because Hamas. Oh, you mean Hamas that Israel's
funded the whole time?
Oops. Yeah. That's how cartoonishly obvious has always
been. Glad people are finally paying attention, but
funny how it's still not stopping.
Well, it depends. I can't imagine you could
have, well, you certainly can't
have the people that were there. Most of
them are dead.
Great. Great. Great. So we killed them all.
So now we gotta get the rest out
of the way.
That was pretty obvious.
Anybody confused?
Beachfront property, no big deal, not my war.
Oh, we gotta get him out of the
way. Most of her dead though, so but
let's get him out of the way. The
Blythe way he talks about that, it actually
makes me, like, I can't even put into
words.
It's sad.
It's like a let down even though I
know he's not it's just it's crazy
that we this is just, you know, it's
like even though I know these people, I
I believe I know what they are, I
still had hope, like I told you, because
it was real, that maybe he would do
the right thing. Why wouldn't I want that?
But my god,
Everybody should be outraged about that. No matter
what side you're on. You're talking about human
lives. You're talking about an entire society that
is gone because US government allowed it to
happen.
And now you're just gonna take advantage of
that?
Yeah. Yeah. Well, where do you go? I
mean, he just told you they're going to
move them, and that's what he already said
before.
It's in the thread I've been sharing every
time. In that thread, he tells you, we
are going to we're going to make it
illegal for there to be refugee camps in
these areas. There it's that's what all of
it is. So when you do that, suddenly
what you're saying is Gazans who have been
displaced are not allowed to have a refugee
place in the place they were displaced from.
So we're gonna move you out here to
Egypt or to wherever else. That's what's happening
unless you or I do something about it.
I'm never calling for violence. Here's what he
said the news says.
I was just just framing the what he
said in the in the tweet. And then
adds that now these settlers
now these settlers have set their sights on
a new prize, one that seems utterly impossible
before October 7th,
returning to Gaza.
The there this is again, if you haven't
seen this by now,
they've had conferences,
Ben Gavir, and they're dancing, and they have
outlined. They've got names in Hebrew for what
each one of these places are gonna be
called. They're doing the same thing in Lebanon.
They're already doing it in Syria.
That's how public it is. They have conferences
about it. International. There's people coming from New
York and they're buying they're selling land in
Gaza in New York City. Only the Jews,
by the way, because that's totally not racist.
I've shown you 3 different times, but we
still can't have an honest conversation about this.
Why? Why? Because people like me are censored.
And then that's and he give an actual
Nazi salute. It's no big deal. But I'm
I'm apparently racist for pointing out the genocide.
God, the world is so crazy.
But don't worry though, because Benjamin Netanyahu
has made it very clear,
emphasized that the ceasefire is temporary.
I mean, right on and this was on
18th. We already talked about this, but it's
very he was telling you if you just
listened,
and we talked about this as it continued
on 17th.
Benjamin Netanyahu saying we received unequivocal guarantees from
the United States that if they that what
they said on this is if the negotiations
fail. My point though is that Netanyahu and
other re interviews and also others from the
Knesset were saying, not if, saying, win the
second phase, we have the authority
to break it, and the US will back
us. That's how they're reading that. And I
said this was always the plan as even
Israeli media covered days ago. When I covered
that, I think I might have it up
here, but I covered the last two shows.
Both Tourette's and Ynet News reported that they
were told they could break the deal.
It says it was reported that Trump agreed
to let Netanyahu break the deal and blame
Hamas,
and Trump will back Israel. That was the
agreement. And that Netanyahu is allowed to guess
what? Fully annex the West Bank, which was
again what Mary Madison requested for the money
he gave her. This is, like, as tight
as a bow, guys. It's obvious what's happening.
It's whether you wanna see it or not.
Now this is on 20th.
K? So there I just so you're clear
about this. From the moment this thing started,
they were already violating the ceasefire. And I
already showed you examples.
So from 20th forward,
Ahmed says, this afternoon,
near Allahabad Square in Central Rafa, the occupation
army shot and killed a 15 year old.
His name was Zakaria bar Barbaka.
As he rode for his donkey. When another
man tried to drag him away, they opened
fire on him too in a blatant violation
of the ceasefire agreement. Here's just one of
many examples.
This is public.
Now, you can see the kid, sadly enough,
who did die,
who had red striped on his pants.
Makes me sick.
Okay.
Here is that child, unfortunately.
And I said, surprise, surprise. And this was
on the 20th as well. Israel's already repeatedly
violated the ceasefire just as in Lebanon,
as, Craig Murray has been reporting from day
1, guys. Proving it on video. No one
cares. And we're not even 24 hours in.
And this is multiple times, mind you. So
the this is not the first one. My
point is I already shared these. And you
can tell that this was for some not
some tit for tat example.
What with the argument being that they always
went, oh, he threw a rock or or
a shot at us, which like a rock
should matter for that. But that's not what
happened here, and you can prove it.
It says, as no Israeli or US government
reports even mentioned that there was some kind
of provocation.
They just ignore it.
Just your typical Zionist murder.
It's just sick, guys.
I'll save you some of the worst. The
point is just to make you can see
they pick him up and they carry him
over. The point is that this is you
can see the kid's face. Okay?
This is him.
He survived the equivalent of 4 atomic bombs
over the course of 15 months
of genocide.
He imagined the suffering he must have gone
through for 15 months, starving every night, watching
his family killed in front of him,
Only to be intentionally targeted and killed by
an Israeli terrorist soldier on the 1st day
of this, quote, ceasefire.
The media won't even report it. But if
an Israeli died, of course, they would be
justifying more bombing.
It's really sad.
Now here,
I have to realize
that I I I think there's more to
this. Let's realize they're using artificial intelligence. They're
using specific hab habsura and lavender programs with
Palantir, by the way,
to ultimately decide who to kill and so
on. So my point is, I'm convinced that
they killed this child because they know everything
else they've done.
He's a liability.
He's a child that can leave and say,
they killed my family. I've watched all this
for 15 months.
Now we can't.
If you don't understand by now that that's
what they're doing, then you're just not paying
attention.
Jeremy Schmidt Schahill points out, Israeli forces have
shot
88 Palestinian civilians in Rafa just on 20th.
And this was only
as of
1:17
PM.
Separately this morning, 1 person was killed and
3 others injured by an explosion of an
object left behind by the IDF,
exactly like I promised you would happen. And
I'm so damn angry that I'm even right
about that.
I
hate hate predicting these horrible things and having
them come to pass.
Then what did I tell you? I'm worried
they're gonna leave things behind for them to
pick up and kill, and that's exactly what
happens. It's not that hard to understand. It's
because you when you understand what you're dealing
with, these people are dark. And that's not
every Israeli or every Jew. I'll say it
every time. But we're talking about Zionist people
who have clearly
they're posting themselves online, guys. They enjoy what
they're doing. Harriss has written articles where they're
laughing or they're telling you what they've done.
These people are
sinister.
And so they've said, let's place this bomb
out. Something that we won't even see happen
just so we can make them suffer a
little bit longer.
That's what Trump and Biden and the rest
of them support.
Footage from Southern Gaza Day shows a man
attempting to avoid Israeli gunfire while trying to
retrieve the body of his 5th 15 year
old executed by snipers, which we just showed
you. Skahill adds to that saying Israel is
continuing to shoot and kill Palestinians in Gaza.
Imagine the reaction if Kassim brigades ambush Israeli
forces.
Like, actual but it forces, not civilians.
Israel has made very clear it does not
respect this agreement.
You I mean, have you you tell me.
Have you heard a single word about this
from any
any of the platforms even pretending to criticize
Israel? Because some of them were doing things
that were like, good. They called it out.
Politico said, look. They've killed more than they
said. Where are they now? You have to
see that as opportunism, guys. They're not calling
this out because they know they can't.
That's how I think.
But what do you think? They're not calling
it out. Period. That's an obvious fact.
Mohammed Shehana points out, and this is in
the aid part of it. Right? So now
the deal is going forward.
We'll get to the point that they've released
so many and have already scooped up, like,
think 60 or more for the West Bank
that we can prove,
which is just what they do every single
time, guys. This is a game of numbers
for them. It's about ending Palestinians.
But the aid aspect is it is it
is it's kind of a moment of glaring
awareness
that they I think
I I mean, I don't even know why
they allowed it to go in the in
this case, seeing as though they've stopped it
every other time, and they're still killing people.
But here's what's interesting.
Muhammad Jihadist says, remember when Israel kept denying
start using starvation as a weapon of war?
Even though we all know it, it's obvious.
On January 16th,
Israel allowed
only 6 trucks in, which is pr backed
up by the UN. And the only thing
you get from screaming liars online is that
Hamas takes it all. That's not even the
point. It's not about it's only 6 were
allowed in. Hamas is now on the other
side of that checkpoint, moron. But they don't
care. My point is it's obvious that they
have been deli withholding aid.
Everybody from the United Nations to human rights
groups to to regular everyone's pointed this out.
People on the ground can see them stopping
it, so it's obvious.
But then,
as of the was this yesterday? So 20th
when this started,
915
went in according
to Reuters.
915.
They could have let in that many trucks
any day for 15 months.
They weaponized food as a bargaining chip, and
then are okay proving it.
Because you know what? They feel they've got
a control in the situation when it comes
to the media and your governments, and frankly,
it seems to be the case.
But they have lost control of your opinion.
I think that matters more.
Because they only do that to in the
in the interest of controlling your opinion.
Now they've lost your opinion.
So I don't know how much more they
can fly through these things that you don't
trust anymore to gain that opinion back.
UN says
915 aid trucks have entered. Now here's what's
more interesting about that on top of that.
The UN has also publicly reported that there's
been no loading whatsoever.
So explain this to me.
Hamas is still there. They've admitted that. In
fact, doesn't even seem they could put dent
in them.
So why aren't they looting at all?
So there's only 1 or 2 ways to
look at this. Either they were never looting,
which I think is obvious, and Israel was
doing all they were doing, or Hamas
was looting,
and now they're respecting the agreement? You
wanna make sense of that one for me?
You wanna line up why they would expect
respect the ceasefire if the group, the dangerous
terrorist group doesn't care about anybody, but they
respect the ceasefire though. For the people that
you tell us they don't care about?
Yeah. That doesn't make any sense if you
have a brain. So, obviously, there's pretty much
one ob one observation here. Israel's been holding
back aid as we all know anyway.
And now they let some in.
It's simple, guys. Your governments don't care about
any of this.
Dan Cohen points out
another example of this. And we knew all
and one of the ones that hasn't popped
up yet, which I guarantee will eventually flesh
out, is the lie or either just the
way they've been using the Bieber family. And
you know more than any, I've been really
pointing it out for a long time. And,
honestly, my only point is that he said
that. Certainly could be that he was forced
to say it, but every other example, they've
come out and been backed up by what
they said before and still say it. So
the point, if you don't know, is that
the the Beavis father was on record saying
the IDF bombs killed his family. He was
tear sad. He's crying.
Those are the 2 red headed children. And
they know that. They know it was reported,
and they still to this day, there's, like,
a major focused campaign more than anything else
just about them. Why? Because they knew it
would be the claim that they took our
babies even though 99% were IDF members and
they were PDO POW detainees.
And, yes, taking that baby was a crime,
and they should be able to calble for
it. Doesn't invalidate the active armed resistance that's
in national law. The point is, what else
do we hear? They raped.
They're they are they're all pregnant and they're
all raped. Yeah. How 0. Not a single
example. But yeah. Well, now we're gonna see
for sure. Right? Because they've been holding back
the bad ones. The Israeli government, the media
claimed, Israel Israeli captives
were being raped and impregnated in order to
stimulate more support for carpet bombing Gaza,
further imperiling the lives of the captives that
they claim to care about.
This will be a case study for future
generations in how genocidal propaganda works.
2,024, July. Chilling document reveals, preparing for horrifying
scenarios of pregnancies.
Right. Knowing this was coming. Hyping it up.
Israel prepares for female hostages, pregnant report.
Welfare ministry repairs for return of sexually abused,
kidnapped women.
The treatment of pregnancy by rape. Guess what?
0.
I'll show you more examples. The point is
every single one of them, save for the
one,
I forget her name now, the skinnier one
with the longer brown hair, who also, remember
she came out, they treated me very well.
They were very kind. That's what she said
on record and backed that up for months
until, weirdly,
after a period of time, she suddenly started
singing a different tune. Now with all the
lies we've seen, the pressure, I think we
all know what happened there. But that you
can decide for yourself.
Everybody
else has continued to say that they were
treated well, that they took them shopping.
I mean, guys, it's crazy.
And same to this very day. Everyone's come
out, has been smiling, has been nourished.
Very different than what we're seeing from the
Israeli torture prisons, which is what they actually
are.
Look at that. And these are some of
the most benign I mean, I hate to
see the cold benign, but, like, in regard
to what we've seen, my god. These guys,
See, I don't even wanna say it because
it's, like, that's not even the what they
went through, I can't even imagine.
My point was to compare, like, they they
got the easy treatment. It's, like, that's you
can't even say that. These people were probably
raped and tortured and starved. Who even knows?
The point is that what you can see
compared to some of the ones we've seen,
like, some of these other people are
horrifying.
Gap like, open gay gaping gaping wounds in
their legs, like, 3 or 4 of them,
like, where they're, like, burning holes in their
legs. Like, it's crazy.
So my point is, you've seen that. These
are some of the women that were released
today.
Laughing, smiling. Yeah. And and they're happily, so
they're going home. But aren't these ones going
home too?
It's crazy.
Now this isn't from today necessarily. It's just
some of the hostages
that Israel's holding without charge.
Here's another one. That's what we're we're gonna
show. This is another one of the children.
Now just so it's clear, all they're releasing
so far is women and children from Israeli
prisons.
Most of which are not even held with
charged with a crime.
That's what even now even corporate's being forced
to engage with, which is why mostly you're
getting a blackout.
But this is Ryan Ralphs, being honest, saying
this was just one of 100 of minors
that Israel has detained.
Watch as he embraces his parents. It's heartbreaking.
That kid.
Imagine imagine being in a prison for years
without your family being tortured, raped. You know?
You're finally coming out and see. Now I
don't know exactly what happened to him, but
but he's crying. He finally gets home to
his father.
For all we know, he threw a rock
or was in the wrong place at the
wrong time.
My point is they never even charged him
with a crime. That's detained. That's administrative detention.
That is well, I'll you know, I'll play
the clip in a second.
They are the only place in the world
that has a military process for children
because they see them as
exactly what you already know.
Muhammad Shehada points out this kid here.
Israel wants you to believe this kid is
a mass murderer, terrorist, rapist, genocidal maniac, barbaric
monster.
Anything but a hostage.
Only their uniformed IDF soldiers are hostages.
Every year, the IDF kidnaps 500 to 700
Palestinian children, locks them without charge or trial,
and it's so easily backed up by international
rights groups. It says, or try to kill
that or try them in a kangaroo military
court with a conviction rate of which is
true. In fact, I thought it was more
than that. 9 they say 99.74%.
I don't I'm not trying to make a
joke. Literally, I thought it was, like, 99.9%.
It says the conviction rate for Israeli settlers,
1.8%.
Have a fun exam have a good time
comparing the evidence of the convictions
or not.
It'll make you
sick. Like this kid here, Tariq,
an American
Palestinian child,
whom the idea of kidnapped, beat unconscious, detained,
and fined for a crime of being Palestinian.
Did you miss the American part?
Funny how all of the people like Brian
Mass and Tom Cotton and can't stop screaming
about Americans. Or how about Stefanik?
For all we know, she's still saying, 456
days. That's all she did for over almost
500 days, was tweet about only Israeli hostile
Palestinian detainees.
Or, excuse me, Israeli detainees.
This is an American, Palestinian.
There are also just Americans, by the way,
who are still trapped in Gaza. None of
your American politicians seem to care about them.
I'd love for you to work that one
out.
Yet another child in the treatment of the
IDF.
Here's another child. Now this one I don't
believe has been let out yet, and we've
talked about her already. This is a this
is a story that came out.
8 year old girl from Gaza. Her name
was Doaa Talat.
She was kidnapped in Rafa last August, and
they even admitted it. They said they were
just trying to help her or whatever. They
said they were taking her safety. Well, she's
never heard from again. And we know what
happens in this, and we know what they
think about Palestinians.
It says by some IDF soldiers from the
4 32nd
32nd, Qizar battalion. Not one of the good
ones. There she is in a photo.
The picture was first posted by the IDF.
They posted this on their own house along
with their torture and killing and dancing in
people's underwear. So worrisome.
No one's ever seen her again. Here's the
full story down here.
Here is a clip I played before, but
it's important to hear this.
This is Jewish American writer, Phyllis Bennis.
Only country in the world
with a military juvenile detention system.
That's the only country in the world that
has a military
juvenile detention system
for children as young as 12. Take 2
kids who live in the West Bank. They're
both, say, 12 years old, and they've both
been kind of naughty, and they've been throwing
stones. An Israeli kid who would be arrested
the way our juvenile justice system is supposed
to work. The kid gets arrested. He's taken
to a juvenile court with his parents being
present. A lawyer is always present whenever he's
questioned.
The other kid's a Palestinian kid whose family
has lived in the neighboring village for
10, 15, 20 generations,
and he's doing the same thing. What happens
to him? They arrest him at 2 o'clock
in the morning. Parents are not told where
he's being taken. He's taken inside Israel out
of the West Bank and, again, in violation
of international law. Right. Interrogated in Hebrew, no
lawyer,
and they are brought to court in a
military justice system. So you have 2 12
year olds doing the same thing and 2
entirely different systems affecting them.
That's called apartheid. Guys, that's a racist system
of segregation. There's no way around this.
Everything you know that matters has documented that.
Wild.
Now drop site news also points out in
in regard to other than children,
another woman who is an activist.
61 year old, Kalida Jarrar, is the highest
profile Palestinian captive to be freed as part
of the ceasefire deal on Sunday. An activist
and a lawmaker in the Palestinian legislative council
for popular front for the liberation Palestine, which
they've named the terrorist organization, which is one
of the many that are not.
So, I mean, look. If you you don't
wanna start split making argument that because people
act out in violence, that makes I mean,
you wanna look at what the Israeli government's
doing right now and you wanna start splitting
hairs about what terrorism is? Reality being is
that these people have been suppressed and attacked.
And the idea is that there are people
that do act out in violence.
You can call it terrorism if you want,
but let's be objective. Let's be consistent about
what we call that and recognize all the
other terrorism happening in the world right now
that we don't wanna call that. My point
is only saying that because you could argue
that peep maybe she
in any context that people make the decision
to act in a way that they feel
that's all they have left. That's the definition
of what people are dealing with when they're
being stepped on.
Or in some cases, the legal reaction. The
armed resistance that's enshrined in international law in
the Fort Geneva Convention, which means if you're
occupied,
you have the right to fight back whether
or not they're fighting you.
So think about that. But
she spent more than 6 years in prison
over the course of 5 separate imprisonments in
the past decade.
Most of which were under administrative detention, which
means without
charge.
So if they were shot to criminal, why
wouldn't they charge her with a crime?
For the last 6 months, she endured solitary
confinement
because, you know, what's going on? So we
hate you, but that's it.
In a 2 by 15 meter cell,
here's what she looked like when she went
in. Here's what she looks like now.
Thought, you know, like, literally turning your hair
white. Now, clearly, you could argue that over
6 years, she just grew older. She is
61.
But we've seen this already. We've seen people
go in in their thirties, come out with
white hair. K? It's it's it's about stress.
It's about a lot of things. It's about
fear,
nonstop, constant cortisol flow. That's what we're talking
about. So these people, you wanna listen to
them.
They've been they've suffered,
but we don't hear about this, do we?
Assad Abu Kabuk excuse me. Assad Abu Ghil
wait, I thought this was
Abu Khalil. Maybe I'm saying his name wrong.
I hope not. Assad
Abu Khalil
reports that in even the New York Times
admits that she did not that and he
says, well, and he didn't recognize her. Admits
that there she was never linked to any
military activities.
She was arrested for her views.
Now saying even the New York Times does
not give much weight to me these days.
My point is that even the mainstream media
that lies for Israel
are telling you that she never committed a
crime.
She had political views they disagreed with. That's
what Israel does.
Hamza Yousef points out that the propaganda by
omission has reached a whole new phase.
Now the mainstream media is completely ignoring the
free Palestinians, which is pretty much what's happening.
Because then they'd have they'd need to ask
why
why are there so many children and women
in Israeli prisons?
And about the conditions they endured as they
come out with beaten up looks and diminished
and, you know, emaciated bodies.
Instead, they just look the other way because
that's what they're paid to do.
Here's a clip with Abu Sita.
We've talked about him more than once.
Hold on. How do I get rid of
that? There it goes.
This is one of the articles I recommend
you read. He was one of the earliest
ones really kinda speaking out about this. October
26, 2023, surgeon Gassin Abusita
on the impending catastrophe in Gaza Hospitals. Now
Now the title seems pretty benign. If you
read it, it's horrifying. What they're doing there,
even then, he was calling out. They were
committing genocide. They were murdering people without
reason.
But he was on an interview,
and he called them out for doing what
we all see them doing.
With me, David Mensah,
suggesting it was Hamas who started this conflict
on October 7th
with Of course, David Mensah. I'm pretty sure
that's rebel news. You know, the a screaming
spectacular
Zionist, the rebel news came out and said,
Ramos did it all. Or that they have
35100 years. Like, it's just it's so crazy.
It's so embarrassing that we have to deal
with people like this that have no idea
what we're talking about or just you know,
do you side with Hamas? And what's the
thing that Piers Morgan kept doing? Do you
do you
what do you keep mostly that he kept
doing? I forget now.
Do you condemn Hamas? What he kept doing.
Right? It's like this is it's just sad.
But here, I'll let it go. David Mensah
suggesting it was Hamas who started this conflict
on October 7th
with their brutality.
You are outside Gaza now.
You know, what do people think about Hamas?
Do they wish they had never
broken through the border that awful day at
6:29 in the morning, fired 4,300
rockets
into Israel
as that onslaught started?
Do they wish that it never happened?
I mean, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Wish that
my I'm sorry. I just have to say
before I play it again.
Talk about a ridiculous journal. It's not even
journalism. That's you that is that's a you
are selling your own narrative that your question
was there. You build it up to make
a very clear response, and that's why he
responded the way he does. Let's think that's
I won't stop it again.
Into Israel, as that onslaught started, do they
wish that it never happened?
Such a dishonest thing to say. We wish
that 1948
never happened. Yep. We wish that,
Israel had not tried to wipe out the
indigenous population of Palestine
and turned our families into refugees.
We wish that the Sabra al Shatila and
the Deir Yassin massacres have never happened. We
wish that the killings
of the first and the second intifadas and
all of the wars in Gaza had never
happened.
This is a war against the Palestinian people
that is
75 years old. And to randomly pick a
point in which to say that this is
when we will accept history,
what lies at the heart of the narrative
of the Israeli spokesman
whose boss is now wanted by the International
Criminal Court, so he literally
works for a wanted war criminal,
what
marks his,
discourse
is the racial
othering of Palestinians,
is the fact that he finds 18,000 Palestinian
dead children
completely
ungrievable.
He does not find it in any way
problematic
that his army
amputated the limbs of over 4,500
Palestinian children. My god.
By the way, I'm wrong about I I
I'm not familiar with the name in in
UK, but so it's Menzies is the guy's
name from the Rebel News. That's not the
guy. So if you know who David Menzor
is, let me know in the chat. It's
the person she referenced at the beginning of
the interview. That and and and what lies
at the heart of the fact that your
channel refers to Palestinians as prisoners, even the
children arrested without trial Yep. And Israelis as
hostages
is again
racialized
othering of Palestinians that has allowed the genocide
to happen for 15 months.
Our lives don't matter
neither to you or to him because of
this color of our skin. Our lives don't
matter neither to you nor to him because
we are Arab Muslims.
The racialized
othering of Palestinians
allowed this genocide to take place.
They didn't like that. Now whatever you think
about the opinion
oh, wait. Hold on. Let me bring this,
this back. Oh, shoot. Wrong one. Hold on.
But, you know, it's in first of all,
what I find really interesting,
you look at what he was saying when
this first started,
And, like, this is what it looks like,
I think. And maybe I'm wrong. Maybe he
was like this before. But look at what
he's saying in the beginning. I mean, in
a good way. But this is what it
looks like to turn a doctor into an
activist because you're confronted with a, like,
an an unquestionable
genocide.
Right? So my point is if you look
at what he's saying in the earlier parts,
it always like, he was trying not to
be super political about it, but simply going,
like, this is bad. Look at what they're
doing. Now he's just, like, you know, he
sees it. He's talking about history. Like, you
you got a doctor who is or, you
know, could have been apolitical, but
you're watching one side genocide another. I don't
know who who could stand there and pretend
like that doesn't matter. But it's that your
Saul says, your shadow refers to Palestinians as
prisoners, even the children arrested without trial and
Israelis as hostages. It's, again, a racialized well,
I think it's what he said. The point
is, right there, 90 Palestinian prisoners.
Right? So everyone's a hostage, as everybody points
out, on Israel's side, but they're all prisoners
on this side.
And you're talking about show women and children.
Now in no context can you call those
prisoners. This isn't a they're not wartime. You
know, they want you to think they're all
part of some war force. They're not. Many
most of these people have been, not charged
and then as we just showed you for
a very long time. Now what you're seeing
is this kind of nonsense. Hen Mazig, who
by the way has me blocked, which is
why I don't see this in the Silicon
Other Things,
says the ex hostages were found wearing necklaces
with Palestinian
flags. Oh my god. The horror.
No. Sure. Maybe they were made to wear
them. Maybe they meant to wear them. Histor
so far, it seems like a lot of
that has actually been happening where they seem
to become befriended or they're hap okay with
what happened despite being taken in the last.
But here yeah. And this guy rightly shows
the star of David that was burned on
this guy's face. We've covered that actually on
our show.
Can you imagine if the Palestinian prisoners who
were convicted murderers are not no. They're not.
In fact, these guys can't stop lying, which
shows you they know what they're doing.
These guys are career liars.
They know that they're not all charged. They
know even Ben Shapiro,
as stupid as he can be, knows
that these people are not all rapists, murderer.
They're these are all women and children so
far that have been let out. But even
in general, that's objectively not even the majority.
They know that. They're lying to you guys
because they have an agenda.
But Mohammed Shahada goes, yeah. Can you imagine?
Israel would surely never do such a thing.
God, this video makes me sick.
Watch this. I wasn't gonna show it, but
I mean, this is
what they do. Well, and you can't you
have to understand what they're doing to these
people. Because if you know what we've already
shown, what they've proven. These people, they're being
tortured and raped and starved, and they're look
at how terrified these guys are. And it's
like, remember okay. Here's a good point to
make from the beginning of this. Remember when
we were talking about
the
early aspects of those people in that white
shroud that were being
interrogated.
Right? And they were saying, look, they admitted
they raped everybody, which now we know as
a fact wasn't true. Okay. Connect the dots.
So they for they coerced a testimony, which
by the way, I mean, that I can
bring up. I mean, it's so funny how
many directions you can take this in.
That there's a 1,000 different articles like this.
Israeli court says Shin Bet pressured man to
give false testimony. That's what they do. More
often than not, that's that's a conversation Israel
openly has.
That's not a joke.
So
when we know the historical advances examples of
them saying they raped and they did all
the lies, they forced it because we now
proven that. So in this conversation,
understand what they're doing to these people.
And that's why these guys are terrified. Who
knows what they probably killed them afterwards, if
you want my honest opinion.
My god. It's just it's it's
deranged.
Look at that guy's face.
Clearly, he has been suffering.
He knows that he I mean, that's he's
terrified.
These people are laughing. I mean, so, again,
whatever you think about it, the bottom line
is what he's doing. He's saying here, bro,
god, they made them wear necklaces. Oh, okay.
You know, aside from raping and torturing that
because that that's not that's the small part
to you. Right? Here you are. Here's your
example of this constantly, and he makes a
whole thread of them doing exactly this all
over Gaza. But let's pretend like you're outraged
about a Palestinian necklace.
You guys, they're this is their job, to
gaslight.
Like this guy, who I'm not I've never
I haven't seen before. But this apparently, whoever
clearly, there's more people out there that are
lying for Israel. He says, Palestinians in Gaza
celebrate the homecoming of a man who raped
a woman in a forest and then cut
her head off.
Nice culture. Tony Burke wants to import the
culture to Australia.
Well, guess what?
All they've let out are 69 women
and 21 children.
That's it.
90 p. We we you've all heard this.
Oh, okay. So is this guy lying to
you? That can't be true.
Or is he being misinformed by other idiots
lying that he blindly believes, which is also
stupid?
All these these people are celebrating
because as it says
here, of these women and children being released
or maybe having a brief reprieve from ongoing
genocide. But Daniel lies.
And, of course, it's,
what is it, almost 636,000
views?
And attacks people in the comments for making
the point. Guys, it's easily verifiable.
Not a man was not I mean, it
that it's simple.
This is what they have to do because
they know that there was these people are
lying for whether I mean, it gets possible
that he's just blindly going along with it
because it's interesting or because it works for
him, but it's a lie.
And this this very claim, look it up.
It's all over the platform.
Wouldn't be surprised if Elon Musk and the
rest worked it up somehow.
Mama Chihada adds on top of that, where
he's literally claiming this, because look at this
guy who raped and did all these things.
Weirdly sounds like another one of these atrocity
propaganda claims that are based on things they
did back in the 1948 massacre.
But Israel has now dropped the investigation
into the 5 soldiers who raped and murdered
provably Palestinian hostages,
bragged about it on WhatsApp, and confessed to
the police. And then you had people in
front of news on what? Channel 14, I
think, openly debating why that should be allowed
forcefully.
1 idiot soldier filmed himself stabbing a handcuffed
Ghazan hostage in the face.
All of them were exonerated today. You know
why? Because Trump's in power.
I mean, how what else do you think
is happening here? Elon Netanyahu and the rest
of them are feeling empowered. And so they
go, screw it. We don't need to pretend
to investigate this anymore. It never happened. We
know that. This was always a ruse.
But here we are. So as he's screaming
about false claims of rape, we have real
rape that's being ignored by the people pretending
to care about it.
Typical.
Now at the same point in time,
even if you disregard all of that, which
I don't know how you could,
the West Bank is currently being seized
just like we told you it would, and
still yet this gets ignored.
David Roth Lindbergh, 20th, Israel is conducting look
at just like before, guys. Look.
Mass arrest in the West Bank. They clearly
don't agree with the ceasefire deal and won't
accept the release of 2,000 illegally detained prisoners,
so they're now replacing the released prisoners with
new ones, which is exactly what happened last
time right on the record.
And I said, and the illegal West Bank
annexation that was reportedly part of the deal
that Trump made with Netanyahu as we discussed,
allowing them to violate ceasefire in the second
phase is now underway.
This appears to all be a ruse as
reported. And then I said, and Israel's not
even winding to the 2nd phase as we
just showed you. They've already publicly violated the
ceasefire. So as as I said,
on on video, I but I bet Trump
backs Netanyahu Netanyahu anyway.
Here we are. I mean, look, they broke
the ceasefire. No one's saying a word. So
are we gonna pretend like Trump's not gonna
keep doing I mean, he just told you.
It's it's one of the worst I told
you so's in my entire career.
Then in West Bank in general, this is
on 20th. For the 2nd night in a
row, armed Israeli settlers are burning Palestinian homes,
shops, and cars in the West Bank.
Right? So you you are feeling embarrassed a
bit by the fact that they're telling you
you lost in Gaza despite you getting what
you want from it until and I'm being
able to continue. But so even that small
feeling of not being good enough, this is
how they act. Murder, murder, rape, and torture.
That's what they do. So they go right
to hurting as many Palestinians elsewhere as they
can. It just could not be as clear
as this.
While they were sleeping,
no justification,
terror, destruction,
not a peep from the international community.
I saw Rod. This is even reported by
Beth Selim, guys.
Last night, settlers, and you can watch the
video, backed, escorted with full cooperation with the
Israeli army.
It's this kind of thing that blows my
mind. I mean, it doesn't really because we
know we're here. You have video of them
doing it. You have Israeli soldiers right with
them. You've got an Israeli human rights group
catching them on video and showing the world.
Look at them breaking international law. Nobody cares.
I mean, you know what I mean.
The people that are supposed to care, that
have any ability to do anything about it
are not saying a word
while pretending like you're racist for telling you
what's happening.
They attacked Palestinian communities in the West Bank.
A 15 year old boy was shot and
killed by the soldiers.
6 Palestinians were injured by Molotov cocktails. This
is the West Bank, guys. We're not talking
about the kids shot over here.
Settlers rioted and threw stones at Palestinian vehicles.
While the deal progresses, the settlers' riots are
clear to impose a price tag for the
release of the Palestinian prisoners.
That is the Israeli human rights group saying
that. You gotta call them
racist? Israeli violence is so normalized in the
west that pogroms against Palestinians in the West
Bank aren't even newsworthy.
Vanessa Bailey.
US president Trump on Monday in his series
of things that are I mean, just
whether executive orders are not. Sitting in that
office and just handing out dictates to the
world, which that's exactly what we're talking about.
Rescinded sanctions
from Biden
on the genocidal far right Israeli settler groups.
The ones we've already talked about. The ones
that there's no debate here. Even Israel's called
them out. These people are literally some of
the worst people you've ever heard of. They've
written about it. They have they they praised
and laughed about breaking kids' arms and torturing
people and rape, women and otherwise.
On top of the fact that Robert's already
covered this,
whether before October 7th or well after,
Israeli settlers consistently use arson attacks to burn
Palestinians alive.
This is just one of the most famous
examples. That child you're looking at. They burned
him alive in a house, then laughed about
it, and then chanted around the family,
all these on the grill, all these on
the grill, at the slain toddlers families as
they walked in. That's the times of Israel.
These are the settlers that Trump just removed
the sanctions from.
Here they are dancing. Ben Gavir was there.
You start to get the picture? I'm sure,
hopefully, you already all got it. The ones
that need to hear it probably get algorithmically
boxed out that don't even know I'm here,
sadly enough. But here's the report. Trump cancels
sanctions on Israeli settlers in the West Bank.
January 20th.
You you still wondering what he's gonna do
here? I think it's pretty obvious.
Here,
starting on 20th, end of the day, they
shut it down.
The Israeli army has decided to shut down
the entire West Bank, closing all entrances to
Palestinian cities, villages with Israeli settler terrorists roaming
freely.
What do you think is happening here? Maybe
the beginning of just like what we saw
in Gaza,
boxing them in, ethnically cleansing, torture, rape, murder,
the same thing.
That's not my opinion. That's what's happening.
This is the reality Israel's designed and implemented
over the past few decades, turning each Palestinian
city and village into a prison that they
can close and open at will.
You know, are are we did you just
get done telling us how this is not
exactly that? It says the word apartheid only
goes so far in describing this. It is
a different system worse than apartheid. If that's
even possible, I agree.
John Cook Jonathan Cook, this is today. K?
This is today. This is as of 9:30
this morning.
So it's not stopping. Israel's ethnic cleansing and
cons and colonialization of Palestine
hasn't let up for one day in more
than 7 decades. The Gaza genocide is just
an especially horrifying staging post.
Now, it's the West Bank again.
Israeli military launches deadly attack on Jenin refugee
camp today,
over and over and over. Wonder what guys,
guys? Well, there are there's a hospice is
there Hamas there? No.
There are Palestinians there? Yeah. That's what's happening.
Well, just like we saw in Gaza, this
is today. Look at that. Now they're running
the tractors through West Bank, tearing up the
streets. You starting to get the picture? There's
consistency
to this. They are destroying
infrastructure because they plan to move them out
of the way.
What do you what else do you think
is happening here?
Injured and led by the martyrdom of many
children and youth in Jenin now, a massive
incursion has led to disturbing in situations. The
IOF, the Israeli occupation forces,
preventing ambulances from reaching the wounded, have brought
in destructive bulldozers and machines. This is just
the same thing.
Of course, here's where we are now.
The same day, they released 90 Palestinians. This
was yesterday. They storm a mosque in the
West Bank and abduct 60 people.
Just whoever was there, because that's how it
works. Replacing released hostages with the new ones.
This and the world is silent. Zionism
Zionist Israel deserve to be demand dismantled, he
says. This is what they do when they
give them a chance.
I agree. Zionism is a problem. They they're
proving this to you in the world right
now.
Vanessa Bili?
Israel arrests 64 Palestinians in the West Bank
following the 90. She's backing this up herself.
The Israeli army detained 64, in fact, Palestinians,
including children as young as 7 years old.
So clearly, it was all about some terrorist
ring. Right? No. We're talking about ran whoever
was there because we need more people, and
we know Trump's gonna back us.
Arrest occurred one day after the 90 prisoners
were released.
Sick.
Mustafa Barghouti points out the Israeli army is
conducting a wide military campaign in the West
Bank. This is as of today,
blocking the entrance to many cities, towns, and
villages, and increasing the number of military checkpoints
with Israeli settler terrorist groups continuing their attacks
on Palestinian villages, including
Gin Safout,
burning houses and cars, and attacking Palestinian vehicles
on the roads.
But trapping them in there while they do
it with military support. This is a ethnic
cleansing
right in public
and military checkpoints that will never go away
just like the other crossings. The men they
put these down. They don't go away.
You're parsing it out 1 by 1. It's
a slow annihilation.
Howard Beckett,
Israeli helicopters, Apache helicopters are now firing at
Palestinians
in the West Bank in broad daylight.
So far, 2 of them have been murdered.
This was on the 21st.
20 injured just from the helicopters.
Here is another example of somebody just arbitrarily
being shot in the back.
They don't even try to hide this anymore,
guys. They are emboldened.
Even though the world sees what they're doing,
really think about what that shows you about
the current power structure by Nor Trump.
So you want my opinion?
This was a, you know, whatever. Some 20
something IDF member, you know, whatever. But one
of it, that's what I just for context,
it could be any number of people. How
old? But an IDF member. But my I'm
thinking probably some, you know, wanting to get
him back feeling, and the guy didn't run.
Right? How dare he not be scared of
me?
So he shot him in the back. They
used to pretend like they cared about that,
but they never really did. They used to
just give you a feign, you know, we'll
go after him. We got him. He's arrested.
And they wait till everyone stops looking and
they pardon him and doesn't get in trouble.
Every time.
They just executed this guy in the back
because he wasn't scared enough while he was
being shot at. That's what I think.
They also followed up and say, well, another
at least 7 Palestinians were killed and at
least 50 injured.
There's multiple examples of this.
Yeah.
Just randomly shooting a child in your life,
you know.
Every day. That's their lives every single day.
The only difference now is they're pretending that
it's not supposed to happen.
Now it's also happening in Lebanon, in case
you forgot, but we'll talk about it more
as we go forward.
Israel and this is on 20th.
So it's showing you emboldened there. They detonated
a massive explosion in the village of Halul,
South Lebanon,
obliterating civilian homes in the middle of the
night
while families were sleeping in them.
Civilian
homes. Yet another flagrant violation of the so
called ceasefire.
Every day this happens. As again, Patrick,
Craig Murray has been very clearly breaking down.
Not even a mention.
How about this?
Your government, which, by the way, if there
was some kind of real back and forth
between the fake sides, they would point this
out. But they're both benefiting from it, so
no one brings it up.
A new $1,000,000,000
mega fortress that the US government's building
in London.
Excuse me. In in Lebanon.
The US embassy.
Ten times bigger than London's.
A mega fortress.
Overlooking the Mediterranean Sea, the new US Embassy
in Lebanon
will be the 2nd largest in the world.
Is that what they need? Are we really
gonna pretend it's an embassy
or a joint US Israeli
occupation?
A bill a $1,000,000,000
mega fortress.
They're not even trying to hide what's happening.
They just are banking on a bunch of
screaming partisans to maybe carry it for them.
And Syria too.
Elizabeth Hagedorn points out that Blinken informed congress
yesterday that the US has issued a limited
sanctions waiver.
Right? So to cut to the chase, it
means, yeah, we know they're bad terrorists, but
we're gonna let you go because there are
bad terrorists.
That's exactly what's happening.
US issues sanctions waiver for countries backing Syria's
transition. Oh, transition? Is that what you're calling
it? The illegal overtaking of an Israeli US
force that you've been funding that 30 seconds
ago we were all told were terrorists and
use those terrorists to justify acts against other
people, including Syria. And now they're in charge.
Yeah. That's that's ridiculous.
And if you think it's only Biden, that's
just how they wanna play it, they get
us these things are on the way out,
so they can blame it on them. We
could just take this back.
The point is you're gonna allow countries to
continue to work with them because they're your
ally.
There's no other way to misread this or
miss there's no way to misread this.
Now Vanessa Bailey's pointing out so you really
understand who they're giving sanctions to or rather
waivers to. This is the people that they
are okay with anybody working with because it's
their bad guy, which is pretty much what
we deal with in the world. Child beheader
appointed as the adviser to Giuliani,
who just congratulated Trump and wished for a
better US Syria relations, while Israel's building a
base there.
Noting that m I 6 white helmets HQ
was less than 200 meters from Aleppo,
where this gruesome child beheading took place.
Sorry not to see that, but this guy
is literally taking second command in Syria.
It's on record, guys. That's the one of
the main people that got seen in that
back of the truck for cutting that child's
head off. Well, they all laughed about it.
Vanessa covered it then.
Unbelievable.
Or, I mean, I shouldn't say that. It's
very believable. But it's amazing that this is
so public, and yet nothing's changing. Because we
are shifting into something new.
This is the actual report. I mean, you
can read it yourself.
And
photos of the new Israeli military base that
is currently being constructed in Syria.
I just don't know how this could get
any more obvious. And as I said, totally
all about freedom
and totally not about the Greater Israel Project,
which is obviously what this is.
But they're not doing anything. It's not us.
We're not even there as you were working
with them, and they promised to fight you,
and you get the medical treatment, you arm
them, you support them, and on and on
and on.
Anybody else feel like this is the most
obvious thing they've ever seen in their lives?
That's me. I don't know.
But I'll tell you what.
If we can if if we just the
smallest amount of change right now.
Just the smallest amount of momentum can tip
this over the edge.
I've never in my life seen more
transparent action
that I think the only thing is keeping
this going if that's even happening
is a desperate need for you to think
that what we're staring at, this minority of
screaming manipulators, is somehow everyone's opinion. Just like
with the COVID 19 lie COVID 19 lie.
They they were needing you to think you
were so alone and nobody thought that. We
can see now that wasn't the case. I'm
hoping whether conservative or liberal or republican or
democrat that you can stand back and just
simply recognize that,
that the world sees this.
Now, if we just sit back and let
it slowly get put back to bed, well,
all we're doing is allowing more of this
to continue or more of whatever else you
think you're fighting that I think is very
clearly exactly what they're rolling out.
So, all all the information is here. As
always, all the information, all the show notes,
every link. Look at do it for yourself.
This is not some ridiculous show where I
lay all these things out and yell narratives
at you. The source material's down there.
If you don't go through your own time
now I get it. There's a lot of
information. It's all chronological as much as there's
a lot of it. So you could take
it through. You could take a second. You'll
find out which one you're looking for.
If you don't take the time to look
into what you need what you know, whatever
one thing that strikes out to you,
look into it. Don't just hear me. Look
into it. Find the source material.
Go through the go to the logical conclusion
of what it shows you and decide whether
you think that's the case. Come to your
own conclusions about it, as I say every
single day. If you're not doing that, then
you will be played.
We all will. If I did that, I'll
eventually get played. So do not fall in
that trap. Find the courage and the integrity
and the principles to stand on what you
actually believe in even if it's uncomfortable, even
if it's challenged by the other party leaders.
It's time to stop playing this game, guys.
Thank you for having the courage to talk,
speak out, be here, share this. We need
your continued support, guys. We're under attack every
single day.
It's not gonna stop. So if you wanna
see this platform continue, we definitely need your
support, financial and otherwise. If you wanna just
reach out and send me a letter, I
need that more than anything. Tell me what
you think. Tell me if I'm making a
mistake. Tell me what you think. You know,
just say, hey. You're doing a good job.
Keep it up.
I need that.
But either way, guys, continue to fight for
what you believe in, and do not be
swayed by some screaming person that tells you
you're supposed to think one way or the
other or some fancy thing or some narrative
that you can tell isn't true,
trust your gut.
Thank you for being here. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.