Because we're losing a lot of people because
of the Internet. And we have to do
something. We have to go see Bill Gates
and a lot of different people
that really understand what's happening. We have to
talk to them, maybe in certain areas, closing
that Internet up in some way. Somebody will
say, oh, freedom of speech. Freedom of speech.
These are foolish people.
Welcome to the daily wrap up. A concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Saturday, January 18, 2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Man, I
got a really great show planned today. Just,
like, so many different little things that I
put in like, the the main points we're
talking about today are gonna be the Gaza
ceasefire, latter half of the show, starting with
the main focus
on the I mean, I I guess what
I've tended what I've been doing over, I
don't know, the last so many years
is when I see something
that I feel like we all
are acknowledging talking about but not really putting
a fine point on, I try to use
the title to kind of, like, make that
point. Now it's obviously people will disagree.
But I think it's pretty obvious that, like,
the Trump deep state fighting rebel concept
is even starting to get pushed away or
at least not really highlighted by a lot
of uncomfortable conservatives right now. People right near
me in general.
Like, you know, people in my inner like,
around me, family, other than that, you know,
usually much more
vocal about things around this conversation, suddenly not
talking about it. And I think right now,
we're all seeing some things that are at
the very least inconsistent
with what was promised.
And so to me, I think the the
rebel
illusion, the rebel narrative has completely collapsed on
itself. And I think that I wanna really
highlight
some things as I'm sure you've all seen
just over the last so many days. But,
hopefully, that can be taken in conjunction with
what we've already been showing. Like, just send
I mean, the different cabinet picks,
whether these, you know, the lobbyists,
merchants of death, Zionist influence technocrats. I mean,
just across the board, but then and then
action started.
Or, I mean, to be very specific,
at least the the discussion of,
planned directions.
Because I'll be the 1st to tell you,
like I've been saying this entire time, we
really don't know until something actually happens. For
all we know, it's some long
concocted narrative to try to make it, you
know, get a certain a better deal, which
is what we tend to hear from the
Trump supporters, which maybe that's the case. Still,
nonetheless,
we see things that are already happening that
need to be acknowledged as not the plan.
But we've seen a lot of these so
far that really start stand out. The North
American Union discussion, which got very ignored by
most of the people that should have called
it out. But now we're seeing things like
the meeting with Bill Gates. And I wanna
be clear about all of this stuff. I'm
not trying to even, for a moment,
suggest that these things are an absolute, therefore,
he is this thing. I've never been that
kind of person,
whether meeting Bill Gates or not. You could
say that maybe he thought he met him
just to try to get some information from
him. Like, I'm sure that's what the narrative
will become. My point though is that it's
all these things in together
that that I think that hard pill thing
we talked about the other day, the hard
pill to swallow
that is that all of these things that
you're seeing, you would call out if it
was a democrat, and everybody knows that. So
when we see a lot of these things
or Donald Trump agreeing to speak at the
Davos meeting,
virtually, of course, but like that makes it
any better for the World Economic Forum. Can
you imagine if that was anybody else that
they would like to call out? So it's
very, very interesting how this keeps happening. All
the different deviations. And and then, you know,
the the stepping back point and seeing the
big picture,
the the great reset direction, the technocracy,
the Zionism, the globalism,
the deep state, like, literally things that we
would all acknowledge outside of the context of
Trump conversation are I mean, as much as
we could argue we know the deep state,
but yet when it becomes very
even, like, tangentially connected to Trump, it's just
not talked about or ignored.
And I'm and I'm not talking about there's
a lot of very
there's conservatives all over this conversation who are
calling this out.
That's my point. And I think right now,
we're seeing this kind of breakdown in front
of us. And I'm hoping people can acknowledge
I I want people to be able to
stand back and see what we're all we've
been trying to call out for years that
this is not some new direction. This is
not sort of like a co opting. This
is just the same government trying different ploys
over different moments and different partisan games to
try to get you in a certain position.
That's my opinion. But I think the evidence
is becoming overwhelmingly clear at this point. Now
we're these connect today, of course, with the
conversation of the ceasefire, which I wanna I'm
gonna go ahead and pat myself on the
back here, like, in the sense of how
we do in the past that, you know,
I demonstrating our value, which I think is
important.
How many times in the past we've had
these conversations about things and given that I'm
giving you my thoughts, my my opinion based
on what I think might happen, never to
say that I know for sure, but how
often those things do come to pass. And
I'm I'm only able I'm not the kind
of person that would say that other than
the fact that I have this recorded track
record of all the things we've done, which
I can look at and say that is
the objective reality. So talking about the ceasefire
conversation, and I've been wrong plenty of times.
We talked about this, Robert wrote an article
about this, and pretty much everything that we
were discussing has already come to pass. And
it's really, honestly, not that difficult to see.
Anybody honest,
nonpartisan objective about this, It was pretty obvious
to see where this was likely going to
go. Now tomorrow is the day when it
will officially take effect. We're gonna talk about
the already breaking down part of that deal,
the things that are already happening in between
that, you know, the the ongoing murder in
Gaza.
Literally trying to get as many kills in
as possible before they have to be forced
to stop, essentially.
But the reality of the deal that has
already broken down. I mean, we were talking
about this the day of. Harrett's article, Ynet
news article, coming from the the Likud party,
people in the Knesset themselves going, like, we're
gonna break this deal in the 2nd phase.
That's the plan. Trump said we could. Now,
yes, those are statements from individual people. Maybe
that's not what actually was the agreement with
Netanyahu. Or why are we even talking about
Trump when technically Biden is still the one
in power?
It's interesting.
To me, I think it's what we all
hope isn't the case but sadly expect. That
this was organized in order to justify the
ongoing agenda and blame it on the Palestinians,
which has been going on for 76 plus
years. Over and over and over. And in
the last year and a half,
many of those have already been proven by
people like us and others waking up to
the reality. The Oslo Accord, the different examples
where it's now been demonstrated with factual evidence
that they planned to not follow through or
any number of the last, what, 7 different
fake ceasefire deals? So I'm I'm
either way, guys, like I said the last
time,
I hope this has some kind of pausing
effect or long lasting effect either way because
at the end of the day, as long
as these people who are suffering get even
a moment's break from what's happening, I still
think that's a win. But it would it's
important that we keep an eye on the
bigger picture and what might be going on.
And sadly, of course, if it is in
the cards that this is basically a plan
to keep this going,
then I think that needs to be acknowledged
right away before we give any credit to
anybody or otherwise give a pass to somebody
or try to avoid accountability for a genocide.
But I think also on top I mean,
we're rather to say on top of that,
there's
another possibility.
A little bit of hope in here that
I'm gonna talk about with Robert's comments and
he's working on another article right now discussing
what might happen here. Post tomorrow and also
with the interesting development around Ben Gavir. I'm
gonna talk about that as well
That is officially, he apparently has resigned. Now
Ben Gavir, if you're not familiar, we'll get
there in a second,
minister in in the in the Israeli government.
Now as of now, it seems he is
no longer a minister, but he's still part
of the the Knesset,
which I'm not really sure how that makes
sense, but I was talking with Robert about
this. But the point is that, ultimately,
he's still in a position of power, but
he's no longer in a position
in the as a minister. But what's interesting,
though, is that if he chooses to take
this a step further
and actually pulls his party out of the
coalition, that'll collapse the government.
Now that's interesting, and how what that will
mean. Now Robert's gonna be writing about all
this, but we'll talk about it in a
later part, you know, today in the show.
But I think it's interesting to see what
this exposes,
That Ben Gavir and the rest of them
are are angry because of what everybody everywhere
has been telling us in the conversation of
Israel that they've always wanted. And the moment
it starts to happen, everyone's screaming, you know,
it just exposes
what most of you already know, that the
world, in the
elitists of the world have been lying to
all of us, which I think we all
already see through. But it's important to break
this down so we know
what's really going on for the next few
steps. And today, we'll make some predictions like
we tend to do about what I think
might be coming, and we'll see whether those
come to pass or not. And, hopefully, you
pay attention. You know, in the in the
sense of, like, recognizing how often we tend
to be, you know, at least in the
right direction on these things. And I do
think that's worthy of praise even from myself,
if you could laugh about that. Because I
think it's important with how suppressed these platforms
are that we demonstrate that. And, look, in
in the people in our inner inner circle
or the independent media alliance, which since I
bring that up, there's well, first, there's a
lot of people in that group, all of
us. I mean, that's the reason that
we
ultimately put that net out the way we
did for the people that we gave the
the credit the the 3 different categories we're
aiming for because it's about nonpartisan objective content.
And I think those people have demonstrated they
have an amazing track record of being objective
and insightful and, like, way ahead of the
curve. Now on the note, since I bring
it up, we just talked to Odysee on
the on the building of the website. As
you guys well know, if you've been in
this field at all, it's these things take
a while that we they're they plan for
January. There's new things they're trying to work
on, different issues they've had. And so we're
aiming, I guess, for early February now for
the rollout of the website. We do have
a couple of panels planned. But, again, those
things kind of up in the air when
you've got 14 sick 16 different people basically
trying to agree to join at certain times.
It can be complicated. But I think we've
got 2 planned right now for the end
of this month. So keep an eye out
for that.
But today, we got a lot to get
into. K? So stay tuned.
Get something to drink. Sit down. As usual,
we have hours to talk. So let's make
sure,
you know,
that we not just digest the information that
we're talking about, but help me get this
out. You know, there's a lot of times
that I wanna talk about that, but ultimately,
it's important that we can break this information
out, get it in front of people that
need to see it. Maybe even not with
TLav in front of it. Just give them
the source material. But I want people to
see what we're talking about. I wanna start
with
a point from the people's reset
that if you guys haven't seen, I've been
talking about it. We've been sharing it. But
coming up on the 29th, we will be
in Mexico. If you wanna still get tickets,
here's the link to support both the event
but also TLav. There's the link for that
right there, and it'll be a great event.
I'm really excited about it. We're gonna I'm
gonna be personally involved in a, international media
panel And and then maybe playing music, I'm
I we were talking about I'm not sure
exactly how it's gonna be going down, but
at the end of the day, I'll be
there. Maybe maybe the campfire either where I
play music. But the point is we're gonna
be having a a week time frame where
a lot's gonna be going on. I find
this I'm really, you know, I'm excited about
this more than anything because I get to
see Derek's community.
And also, just the the kind of it's
just by looking at the the
atmosphere,
it already and, you know, again, this is
I haven't been there but it already feels
like something that's quite a bit different than
some of these other events that I've been
to. And I feel like it's almost like
a breath of fresh air. And I'm really
excited to be a part of this and
the kind of people that, you know again,
for me, it's always the nonpartisan objective kind
of perspective. It's thinking beyond the worldly kind
of division dynamic. And I feel like that's
what this is really cultivating. So make sure
you check it out. Join us there.
I wanna say in the to start off,
I had a great article that went out
today from Matt Ehret. It's part 3.
The century of UFO psyops exposed part 3
spooks, scientologists,
satanists, and the new mind wars. Tell you,
man, this guy is just at a whole
new level. Matt Ehret is such an intelligent
person, and there's plenty of things I guarantee
people will push back on or disagree with.
And so many different levels and angles of
this story because if when you read his
articles, you quickly find out that even the
title or even the main premise, it's rarely
the big there's so many focuses and deeper
points that connect to everything we're dealing with
right now. I mean, everything from the part
Trump partisan
division to I mean, everything, guys. The way
that this is going forward is
he paints a picture that makes it very
much feel like almost all of this is
interconnected in some way. But just take the
time to read this. Start with part 1.
It's very it's a it's an excellent breakdown
of the what he argues is the coming
you know, we've talked a lot about the
project blue beam, project blue book, both angle
you know, elements of the same kind of
general conversation,
And the and the eventual shooter drop for
that, whether that's a CGI thing or, you
know, whatever we're talking about. For those who
don't know, just take a second look into
it. The point is that he argues and
is very well documented that this has been
a long term
plan to roll out this agenda. In a
way, he argues to circumvent the idea of,
you know, like religion, Christianity, but that may
be a personal perspective from a Christian. But
the point is, overall, very, very clear, your
government has been aggressively lying to you, manipulating
you
in ways that will make you have nightmares,
but it's worth reading. So I'll leave this
here for you guys to check out. And
I and I at some point,
if it it's weird how we keep seeing
these little brief moments of stories around the
UFO conversation. Right? The we you know, like,
all of a sudden, like, the Tom DeLonge
thing into the stars and then it kinda
vanishes. And it's there, but it's it's not
and then all of a sudden, you know,
Obama talks about aliens on a show. It's
weird, isn't it? Like, it never gets this
full moment of, like, main full court press
kind of, like, mainstream media conversation.
And I'm late like, I'm waiting for that
shoe to drop, essentially. My point is that
at some point, when I feel the time
is right, I'm gonna dive through those articles
probably on the show. Maybe with that Matt
with Matt and talk about all of it
because it's
it's fascinating. If you read it, you'll see
what I'm saying. But let's get into, to
start, some censorship media independent media conversation. I
wanna talk about 2 things reasonably quickly. That's
TikTok
and Sam Husseini.
Not necessarily connected, but the point about, you
know, censorship. And I think it's really important
to understand both of these conversations as we
roll into this new, you know, hopefully better
administration.
I just don't see any indication of that.
Sure as hell hope so. Hope hope it
will be better, though. Forbes reports as of
17th. TikTok ban upheld by supreme court should
start Sunday, so that's tomorrow. You guys have
probably heard up until this point. If you
haven't, the basic back and forth is that
this is, you know, some side of it
saying it's China influencing what's going on and
we have to get rid of that. But
the reality was very quickly shown as it
almost always tends to be, and that's not
my opinion,
Israel's interest with the US government carrying out.
It's pretty objectively obvious that this is about
negative con I'll I'll show you Blinken making
that point, saying that Israel is being criticized
and we can't allow that. It's a really
fascinating conversation that shows you, I think, the
true string pullers here.
And and we have to objective or just
recognize TikTok is used by millions of Americans.
Are we pretending that Twitter and Google and
YouTube don't have
pair of prep, weaponized algorithms or whatever you
wanna call it? I mean, we can't be
that stupid. We can't be that naive, guys.
They're doing they're all doing the same thing.
They what they don't like is that well,
what's interesting, by the way, is there are
points that people make to argue, and I'll
I'll show you actually in a second,
that they demonstrated their algorithm is not manipulative.
But I don't know why we would trust
them. Maybe they lied. Maybe they gave you
false information. But isn't it interesting if it
did turn out that TikTok didn't have some
weaponized thing and the point was that this
is just what people think and they all
hate Israel? And this side is the one
screaming to stop that and they're the ones
acting like fighting for free speech. It kinda
just feel like what we get used to.
Doesn't it? But it's hard for me to
wrap my mind around that. I don't know
why in the world China or any other
government like Russia would not be doing the
same thing.
Maybe that's just my pessimistic world view though.
But I know it's the point is that
I don't think Russia and China are any
better than the United States. But this is
interesting. Let's go through this. So here's where,
Justin Amash, lib libertarian, member of congress until
2021,
says whatever its status under the first amendment,
the so called TikTok law serves to limit
and control speech. Now it's a really important
way to start because it really everything else
is narrative, guys.
I mean, it it's it's interesting what type
of person decides to care about the all
encompassing national security threat. Now, obviously, there's not
there's cases where I would imagine that that's
real, whatever that means to you. Like, I
could imagine a circumstance where I might even
go, yeah, that matters. But think about how
ridiculous
and how frivolous
that claim is. Our government uses national security
interest to cover just about anything everywhere. And
we've seen things that turn out to not
even be remotely that. Meaning, otherwise, they're lying
to you, guys. That happens all the time
for nothing, in fact, because lying. Making up
a story or Bolton saying, we're on and
things in their harbor, and then we go
off on, like, a 7 month terror strike
for limpet minds. But I know false flags.
Turns out nothing actually happened. It was all
Bolton and the US government.
My point is that it's all narrative around
the idea of what this might be doing
in the secret you know, it's certainly possible.
I would not put it out the
the outside their own possibility that China is
using this to circumvent the US government.
But wouldn't we demand that they prove that
to us if that was the case seeing
as how this is one of the most
popular apps in in a in in a
digital world, this is a free speech conversation.
Right? There are people who are speaking, they
want the app, they're engaging, they've built followings.
I mean, and there's another point he made
about money.
Guys, there's a people that have entire careers
on there whether you care about that or
not. They're Americans. Or anywhere for that matter,
but we're talking about Americans censoring this.
So it's interesting that his point is that
this limits
speech. So as a government that is currently
screaming about fighting for free speech,
yet again, another example that we they just
don't care about anything when it bumps up
against what they want.
I don't know why anybody trusts something like
that.
It says, remember,
it doesn't just apply to TikTok. That's a
key fact that is consistently overlooked. And that
is a point we've already caught discussed in
the show.
Once this goes forward, it's it's a precedent.
And not not only that, the actual the
the verbiage they're using does clearly
broadly apply, but we're just pretending that's not
the case, you know, because typical partisan blindness
for the agenda. But it says in its
in its effort to intimidate US owners of
social media companies, again, not just TikTok, with
a threat of forced divestment if they don't
comply with potentially unlawful government demands.
That's happening right now on Twitter, regardless of
what you wanna believe. It says play ball
or face accusations, you're subject to the direction
or control of a foreign adversary.
Who do you think he's talking about?
The Trump administration must work with Congress to
repeal it.
Now that's a hopeful thought.
Right?
Because that mean that it's I know that's
what we want to believe, and if he
does it, in the context of not some
other, like, reverse bad direction, right, but just
actually just letting people use the app and
not trying to manipulate or not trying to
sell it, force the sale of it to
somebody who can use it for our interest
or for the government's interest, which is so
ridiculous that that's somehow better.
But let's wait and see. I don't think
that's what's gonna happen because I think he's
part of the same government doing the same
thing, but I have hope that it'll be
better. Now Trump says, interestingly, on that note
that he may give TikTok a 90 day
reprieve. Now right there, guys, doesn't that just
automatically prove that it's not what we're talking
about? Because all he's saying is a repur
90 days to get your sh s h
I t together. So
he's not saying, well, you're good. He's saying,
comply with what we want in 90 days.
That's not the same thing. Even though this
is getting praise for Trump's gonna give him
a pass. Well, maybe. Again, we're not there
yet. Maybe that will happen. Maybe if 90
days, he's gonna go never mind. But why
wouldn't he just do that now?
Or maybe what is it? 2 days from
now, maybe he'll just do that. We'll have
to wait and see. But it says the
president said on Saturday he would most likely,
so already not definitive, but despite it being
framed that way because that works for them.
Give TikTok a 90 day reprieve from a
potential ban, a lot of ifs in there,
after he takes office on Monday.
As the app with a 170,000,000
American users buzzed with nervous anticipation.
Says the 90 day extension is something that
will be most likely done because it's appropriate.
I'll decide to do that. I'll probably announce
it on Monday.
Let's see. So it sounds definitive, but then
interestingly, he says most likely. So it doesn't
you know, it's interesting.
But then again, they say the Chinese owned
app, like, I I just don't think that's
as clear. I think this is at the
narrative,
you know, like a sod gassing children, and
it may very well be the case in
the context of Chinese the Chinese government. I
mean, look, I think it's as much the
case as which is not which is the
case as the US government having influence over
tick over Twitter
or YouTube.
But does that mean the US government owns
Twitter? And that's a fair question because maybe
they do. So I think it's the same
dynamic
because we have information coming from the Singaporean,
oh, the Singaporean
is that how you say Singaporean?
The sing the the owner from Singapore saying
that that's not the case, but it's it's
interesting nonetheless.
And it says user will, the under a
law passed last year, upheld on Friday, unanimous
supreme in a by a unanimous supreme court,
the platform has until Sunday to cut ties
with a China based parent fight dance. So
that's where that comes from. But, I mean,
look, guys. We literally have a a person
who's currently in the government, a leading military
contractor, a person working on artificial intelligence when
they have all sorts of overlapping programs with
the government to use that to literally control
how you think about things rolling running a
social media platform.
It's just weird the way we can look
at things one way and not the other
when it works for our per partisan interest
or when we're the US versus China. It's
very fascinating to me.
Anyway, the point overall is that this seems
like a kick down the road. Right? Making
it give him a momentary benefit to say,
see, Trump's gonna save TikTok and maybe not.
And then interestingly, in the same way, which
starts to I really just really I really
hope people start to see the continuity of
all this from either side. It says Biden
blocking implementation of the TikTok ban at the
last minute.
On 16th,
following months in which he could be rightly
blamed by young voters for banning TikTok would
be yet another pitch perfect example of Democrats'
political ineptitude. And this is on the 6th,
15th, to 16th. The point is it still
clearly seems to be going. But I just
think it's interesting that both of them are
flirting with different ideas about maybe not, what
we're gonna do.
I think it's all b s. I think
all of them have the interest to stop
this because Israel said or because that's in
their interest too. All this is not noise,
in my opinion. But you can decide for
yourself. But as I always say, it's what
happens at the outcome. Right? So if this
goes forward and none of them would care
to stop it, well, then I'm pretty clear
that none of this meant anything. That's how
that will be my opinion.
Arnaud points out, well, first, Walter Bloomberg says,
US Supreme Court rules against TikTok's challenge to
law that would force sale or ban app
in United States.
And he says, meaning the TikTok ban is
going forward unless the Trump administration decides against
it, which doesn't in my opinion, doesn't seem
to be the case. Wait and see. Insane
to think that one of the biggest single
acts of censorship
ever,
170,000,000
Americans. Really think about that.
Shutting down an app used by that many
people would be done by a country that's
always been lecturing the world on freedom and
free speech.
It's pretty damn ridiculous. And he says, goes
to show that Americans' commitment to freedom was
always conditional on its dominance. Now, to be
clear,
I would argue too, note based on his
work, he's talking about the government, but we
always even I tend to fall in that
trap sometimes, and it's not them or us.
It's the government. Right? So the point is,
goes to show that America's government's commitment to
freedom was always conditional on its dominance, its
control over you included.
That's I added that. But it says, which
is no freedom at all. It's the age
old story of power pretending to be principle.
He's right. Nothing new about this. It goes
back as long as you wanna look, guys.
We're just living under another authoritarian dictatorship type
government pretending to be loving freedom. I mean,
how long have we been talking about this?
And it's not what we have to be.
That's not maybe we weren't even always that.
The point is we need to wake up
to that reality. 1st have to acknowledge a
problem before we can even begin to solve
it. As usual, the partisan screamers keep us
from looking at anything other than their focal
point.
We can change that. Now Tiberias makes a
little quick breakdown as he does, which is
funny. He says, tick this is my point
from this at least is what they're claiming.
So consider for what you will. TikToks, they
they he says has normal algorithm.
Israel says TikTok is anti semitic. Right? The
point is they're making it about anti semitic
Israel. Right? The reality is just being look
at what the look at Israel's government and
how they're murdering children. Oh, you're racist. No.
No. You're just a killer, but pretend all
you want. And it says the US, does
your algorithm promote anti semitic content?
And TikTok says no. Here you go. Take
a look. Now that's the point. It's clearly
the point is how do we know that
what was demonstrated is the full picture, blah
blah blah.
But it says
everyone just hates Israel, which, guys, that's pretty
clear. And it's not because they just hate
Israel. It's because Israel is committing a genocide.
And pretty people tend to get unhappy about
children being murdered.
And he says, the US goes frowny face.
Israel says, ban it. US says, TikTok will
be banned. US citizens,
it says, downloads red note. Now you haven't
heard that conversation. It's this interesting insight into,
you know, it's basically right now well, I'll
just finish reading this and I'll say it.
It's a it's a Chinese app dynamic. So
they can see into into, like, Chinese dynamics.
And it says, US boot lookers say, I
bet you can't talk about t, Tiananmen Square
or the Uyghurs are on red note.
Red note. Check out these delicious Uyghur recipes.
US citizens say realize how comprehensive US propaganda
on China actually is. The point being
that
through this dynamic, and arguably could also be
some long play, the point is people ended
up downloading this app to kind of get
around that and then got this full frontal
realization
that it's not suppressed, that they had access
to all these things that the US is
telling you China is aggressively censoring. So it's
a fair point. How does that line up?
Now in no way am I trying to
argue China good guy or their government doesn't
do all sorts of horrible things. We can
see
the social credit system that terrifies me and
everything else, but it doesn't mean everything the
US says about China is true or anything
else for that matter. Worth considering.
Matt Gaetz, of course, chimes in and says,
what are all these Zoomers going to do
with their time when TikTok is gone Sunday?
I said, I guess wait to be censored
from the next place that fake free speech
warriors working for Israel, such as yourself, need
to censor due to justifiable criticism of Israel
and its
ongoing multination genocide. Hashtag free speech.
Moron.
These people are just so ridiculous. I don't
even know why people think they're they're all
grift. They're all one liners and nonsense. It
just makes me laugh that people can't see
through them. Ben Shapiro, speaking of 1, says,
The CCP is our enemy. TikTok is a
Chinese op. It's designed to manipulate Westerners into
parroting CCP propaganda while gathering all their data.
Certainly could be. It says, If TikTok divests
itself from Chinese ownership, it should continue to
operate. If not, it should not.
Now that's the dumb part. Okay. Fine. Let's
just say you think it's a Chinese op
doing all these things. Why? It's certainly in
the cards.
Just like the US does it all over
the world. Doesn't make it any better.
The point is, you forcing them to do
what you want because of your interest is
authoritarian, guys. It's stupid. It's obviously what they
pretend they're not. It's obviously what they pretend
China is.
So if you're literally telling us you have
to sell your company because we don't like
what it's doing in our country, it's just
ridiculous that we think that kind of hubris
or that kind of
there's a better word for it. But it
is imperialism. Right? Or rather authoritarianism.
Like, you're just deciding that you get to
you can have you could dictate what they
have to do because of your interests.
And as Nicholas Fuentes said, and and very
much even though what's funny is even though
ratioed the hell out of Ben Shapiro despite
having
7,000,000 views
follower, excuse me, which is embarrassing. By By
the way, if you don't know what the
ratio is, it's just between the engagement on
each tweet. Nicholas con Nick responds to him,
which usually gets far less engagement and gets
almost double the engagement. Which I think is
interesting.
But what's funny, at least at least Ingard
likes,
is that ultimately,
I think that right now people are very
much seeing through this larger conversation. Whatever you
think about Nicholas Fuentes. And he says, you
are an Israeli op designed to manipulate white
people into parroting Zionist propaganda.
Well played. That's pretty much exactly what he's
obviously doing. And nobody seems to I mean,
Ben Shapiro even barely denies that.
Attacking other Jewish people for not supporting Zionism.
Pretty damn obvious.
But think about how interesting it is that
he has an interest to scream China, China,
China. They're the ones. Clearly,
with everything we can see, that seems to
indicate to me, my opinion, that he is
just doing his role as a Zionist propagandist
to go look over there when it's clearly
Israel's interest, as even Greenblatt has been screaming
about. We'll get there in a second.
Drop site news points at blinking,
saying exactly what we're talking about.
Why has the PR been so awful? I
know that's not your area of expertise, but
you have to,
have some thoughts on that with which is,
I mean,
as you said,
why has Hamas disappeared in terms of public
perception?
An offer is on the table to have
a ceasefire,
and yet the world is screaming about Israel.
It's like, why aren't they screaming about Hamas
except the cease
Morons. Right? I mean, you already know the
story. They have repeatedly it's and I this
is just so you know, if you guys
aren't aware of this, we'll get to this
larger conversation later.
Without question, this has been openly discussed by
even Israel's media.
And now even people in the United States.
Even people in the mainstream media. It has
been and I mean, Ben Gavir just publicly
admitted that he has sabotaged more than 1.
Netanyahu has done the same. Yet, this exact
moment, we were highlighting that they were lying.
That ultimately Hamas accepts and then Netanyahu goes
and bombs Rafa. The next time, does something
different every time it's happened, which is I
think probably what's gonna happen coming up soon.
But these 2 either know that or don't.
It doesn't really matter to me, but they're
they're incorrect.
Bring over the the hostages. It said it's
all the other way around.
I I I
I I've typically, the Israelis are good at
PR.
What's happened here? How have they No. No.
They're not. They're actually being exposed for probably
the one of the worst propagandists on the
planet at least this generation.
My god. It's actually wildly embarrassing. I think
it's either that they were better before, got
lazy in the middle somewhere, or they've been
never good, and they've just been using shouts
of racism to keep people in their place.
But, clearly, today, we can see how flimsy
and clumsy their propaganda is. Reactive is the
word I tend to use. Like, getting caught
for something and then fumbling out, cobbling together
some really poor narrative that falls apart in
30 seconds
because they had to quickly.
That's that's what we see. How have they
and we
been so ineffective at communicating,
the the realities there and are are on
an intravenous feed of information,
with,
new
impulses, inputs every millisecond.
And, of course, the way this is played
out on social media
has
dominated the, the narrative.
And you have
a social media ecosystem environment
in which
context,
history,
facts
get lost,
and the emotion, the impact
of images,
dominates.
And we can't we can't discount that,
but I think it also,
has a very, very, very challenging effect on,
on on the narrative.
Yeah. A small parenthetical point, which is some
wonder why there was such overwhelming support,
for us to shut down potentially TikTok or
other entities of that nature. If you look
at the,
the postings on Tik Tok and the number
of mentions of Palestinians relative to other social
media sites, it's overwhelmingly
so
among, TikTok,
broadcast. So I'd, I'd know that's of of,
a real interest, and the president will get
the chance to to make action in that
regard.
Sorry about the recording. It's just a weird
sound there. But what so what's interesting, guys
I mean, so let let's be clear about
this. It's it's objectively clear to people in
the world. Right, what Israel's doing. Like, it's
not it's not even it's the the idea
that that it's some kind of ongoing debate
is only some illusion between western elitists and
Zionists and and, you know, the whole the
the media that follows along. But so so
when they break it all down like this,
like, there's some kind of ongoing thing hold
on. What what there was,
where was that?
Oh, that I already removed that? Oh, well.
Well, I I just think it's interesting to
me that what see, what we're talking about
as he says, where is it? They're losing
the PR battle. Then ultimately, you know, it's
TikTok lying about well, is that the case?
I mean, guys, we can all objectively see
that they're committing a genocide. And people go
on the platform and say, look. They're this
is terrible. Look what they're doing. And they
go, oh, you're racist.
Okay. So if that's the only location, which
I it's I don't think it is, but
they're making it out to be, look at
TikTok. They're the only one. Look, it's anti
or rather the the major problem. It's all
anti semitic. Well, what does that show you?
Would the immediate thought be China's lying about?
Well, no. We know they're not lying, guys.
We know that what they're talking about is
happening.
So it's almost like it proves itself that
at least in that case, it's not being
controlled by some CCP dynamic. Clearly, it is
what we can all see happening. So it's
like that like, it's like a self proving
lie. It's very interesting to me. But so
here he's telling you, right, that this is
the case. Here's Greenblatt well before this telling
you that this is a problem that TikTok
has to go. I also
wanna point out that we have a major,
major,
major
generational problem. All the polling I've seen, ADL's
polling,
ICC's
polling,
independent
polling suggests
this is not a left right gap, folks.
The Asian United States support for Israel
is not left and right.
It is young and old.
And so we really have a TikTok problem,
a Gen Z problem that our community needs
to put. The same brains that gave us
Tagli,
the same brains that gave us all these
other amazing innovations
need to put our energy toward this,
like, fast,
and, again, like we've been chasing this left
right divide.
It's the wrong
game.
The real game of the next generation.
We saw a dramatic change
in the language of the activists here in
America on October 8th. See, this is what
we're I I think what we're watching here,
guys, is critical mass.
We're watching for the first time in history,
maybe not, but at least as I can
see,
where it got it is reached.
The world shifted its opinion.
The over to window was shattered, and now,
we're for for the first time, we're at
a point technologically where they can essentially step
on that. Now, I don't know if that
even did or not. Like, I think I
still think the majority of people see this.
But there's a core element of this where
certain people aren't able or allowed to recognize
that. I don't think we've been in a
place like that before.
I I think it's been a long time
since we've seen this kind of a massive
shift in opinion because of just an exposure
to information.
Like, that's it's I think we're right now
in a rapid rush for them to never
let that happen again. They're they're literally pipe
pipering us into this technocratic bubble where nothing
like this will ever happen again. I think
that's the kind of thing that's happening. But
it's interesting to think about, isn't it? When
this happened post October 7th, when they went
full genocide, instead of going to the UN,
which would have changed the world, they they
would have never had to ask for any
support ever again. Everything would have been on
their side forever if they went to the
UN and said, we go what you tell
us what we need to do. You attacked
us. We're, you know, even, like, I I
I I talked about recently with, Dave,
Smith pointed out. Like, if he would've come
in and said, here's a 2 safe solution.
They could've gone on for the rest of
their lives like the hero and got, you
know, but it didn't happen. They went immediately
full genocide because that's who Zion that's what
Zionism is.
And and they they broke the model. They
broke the model. People woke up. Here, this
guy is telling you that we've
how long have we seen this left right
divide on every topic? That's how they've controlled
this. This broke the model.
Now there's rushing to change that. Getting ready
to TikTok seems to be one of the
first steps.
The racial game and the next generation,
we saw a dramatic change in the language
of the activists
here in America
on October the 8th.
The language of groups that we belong tracked
have long been problematic,
like Students For Justice in Palestine and Jewish
Voice For Peace.
The language I could show you from their
toolkits
because our analysts are in their groups. Yeah.
That means they have spies,
Israeli spies in American
Jewish organizations
that are against Israel.
No big deal. I'll I'll get to it
in a minute where I'll show you James
Lee's documentary again and play that clip where
Greenblatt is literally I mean, it's a guys,
this is a an Israeli spy organization.
It's not that hard to recognize.
We saw this again on October 8th. It
was that fast.
Like, the language in their toolkits
was all about the Zionist entities.
Exactly.
Right? And they wanna make that to be
some secret sidestep of no, guys. If your
whole point is they've always been this racist
group, then why would they suddenly start saying
because first of all, they weren't a racist
group, but they started to recognize the bigger
picture.
Whether because of work like ours or Dan
Cohen or other people out there that very,
very carefully
laid out the stones from step to step
to step. Here is the reality. And it's
so basic. That's the thing that Dan has
been saying. This is not complicated. They love
to go, it's just such a complicate no.
It's not. It's actually very simple.
It's it's horrifying and very simple. And that's
the the thing is people started to see
that.
That's what that's that's why this is happening.
And that's that's left and right of the
one government that we currently have, guys.
And now Tiberias says well, the one yeah.
Well, I'll leave it there. The fact that
he says the the fact the United States
is banning TikTok for Israel
while Israel
hasn't even banned TikTok itself
is hilarious and insulting.
He says, like, do US citizens still not
realize what's going on? You're being brainwashed to
support crimes the rest of the world opposes,
and we all see it. Like, we really
gotta come to terms with this, guys. The
the amount of people that don't recognize how
vivid this is to the world,
It's not the majority, clearly, but it's enough
people in the power structure and the people
that are being the team sport politics of
it all and the ones that are still
following them.
The world sees right through this.
Now he may this is really important, by
the way. In the context of censorship in
general, if you everyone you know, TikTok and
all the rest, you know, blaming something else
but tick Twitter,
it's important to recognize that this
is constant right now.
Tiberius asked, grok.
Elon Musk has complied with government censorship more
than Jack Dorsey did, Grok said. Musk is
everything he claims to hate. He says, is
censorship worse since Musk took over on Twitter?
Grok answered, since Elon Musk took over, the
platform's approach to censorship has been both praised
and criticized leading to a complex picture.
Increased
compliance
with government requests. I mean, how it's by
the way, was public information in his lawsuit?
We talked about it, but the team sport
politics ignored it while screaming free free peep
free speech savior,
like the ones you might expect me to
name. And the point here
is that in that lawsuit, what is it?
91% or 90 something percent of the government
had they've already complied with. They posted that
in their own lawsuit. And then it also
recognized that GARM,
they they it said it said complied or
exceeded the requirements of GAR. So then what
was this whole conversation about? As Mike Benz
even pointed out, they pretend to disband it,
it seems, but the in the in the
actual entity state the the network ultimately continued.
In July, Yecorino from the World Economic Forum,
who runs Twitter with with, Elon,
partnered with GARM again.
And then this whole thing spins out where,
was it Ben Shapiro and the rest were
making this big case about GARM and what's
going to censorship in the in the congress?
And none of them were willing to point
out the fact that she publicly said in
July that she had repartnered with that group.
It's just so grossly dishonest.
Several reports suggest that Twitter has complied with
government requests for content removal at a higher
rate under Musk ownership than before. For instance,
data indicates that Twitter acted on 71% of
legal requests to remove content in the first
half, Just the first half of the year
following Musk's acquisition.
Significant increase from compliance rates under previous management.
I'm sure people will disregard it. And it's
just a screenshot, so do it for yourself.
But recognize that I think it's pretty clear
what we're seeing on this platform.
And by the government supposedly screaming free speech.
I gotta be this this really, really bugged
me. I've seen this so many times. I
know Sam. Sam Hussein is a good man,
and he's an honest person, in my experience.
Question everything as always. Right? But I've made
my engagement with this person. He's one of
the few voices in this room. One of
he's a grizzled long term state department reporter,
guys. He's there all the time. And the
way that this it just it needs to
show you what where you really are.
And and to be and here's what's great.
This is at the tail end of Biden's
administration.
Now, you could of course, we could hope
that it would be better under Trump, but
the last example didn't show us anything different.
Let me let me just I'll play this
first story. Okay? So Wyatt Reed shares this.
And I'll give you a breakdown, from a
couple of people that shared some of that.
Decentral News, for example, did a great breakdown
on this. I think this is the most
kind of the best video to show you
Matt Miller involved and the way this goes
down. The bottom line is Sam Hussein, who's
been there
for a long time.
I've played many times. He said the news,
in fact, check out his account. He's done
great work kind of keeping track of the
state department conversations and different times that Sam
has tried to get the good questions in.
And to come comes to a point post
the Israel genocide
that he just would be ignored
for months.
The the famous line where he goes, what
and I'm a potted plant. Right? Or just
will not will not he says it again
in this clip. Will not acknowledge him, will
not call on him.
Very childish. Right? Like, that's not an accident.
You're in the room. They let you in
the room. They refuse to call on you.
It shows you this this is access journalism,
guys. This is the broken part of this.
These
there
I have a part time broad stroking even
with the fact that people didn't speak up.
Only because I would argue that like, for
example, let's say,
Matt Lee was in there.
I have respect for the way he engaged
with this. But, nonetheless, if he didn't say
a word when this went down, because I'm
not sure, I imagine he's probably in there,
that I would have criticism about that whether
or not I support his questions. Because how
dare you not stand up in solidarity with
what's happening here. You all know this is
wrong. And the point is that people refuse
to stand up because they know they'll lose
their access.
Guess what, guys? That's not journalism.
If all of you refused
to play the game and just
nobody came to that room, well, they would
lose all the power. But the point is
other lackeys would swing in and they pretend
that was the current media. That's how this
works. It's Mockingbird Media. This is fake dynamic.
That's what everyone's starting to recognize. And so
what you can see here is Sam trying
to ask a question because the point is
Matt already told him, we're not going to
call on you.
So he tries to get a question in
when Blinken is giving his discussion and saying
things that are repugnant,
disgusting.
Blinking,
taking part in genocide, acting like he's here
to help. And and Sam Hussaini has comments.
And they literally
drag him from the room
in a supposed place that's that respects free
speech
for speaking up. It's not like he did
anything violent. He simply spoke.
Think about what that shows you where where
we are.
Cities have simply
we are being reborn.
It's also a moment of historic possibility. You
can please, sir.
Again, I'm happy to address questions. So in
so in this clip, the point is all
that happened before
and I think I I I think I
have, this one here as well. Let me
see right here.
Oh, that one kinda starts there too. Well,
just just the point is that the all
that happens before this is that he interrupts.
Lincoln's talking,
and he interrupts.
And set speaks over him because the point
is he's not he well, he asked a
question.
And they say, well, hold the question till
the end. So we're we have to a
block, you know
they don't get to dictate how this process
works, guys. They they do because they all
comply. And they know peep the lucky journalists
in there, if you wanna call them that,
will lose their access and they use that
to control how this works, not letting certain
people in. Now it was well, Matt Bloom
Max Blumenthal also
stood up and said some things and kinda
just walked out on his own accord with
his phone, but good on good for him
on supporting Sam Husseini.
But I think Sam was the one that
I think really deserves the credit in all
this for the fact that he, you know,
was the focal point and they dragged him
from the room. But Sam but Max was
the only one that stood up and left
in solidarity, so he deserves credit for that
and the fact that nobody else did.
We are being reborn.
It's also a moment of historic possibility.
You can leave, sir. To have a question.
I'm happy to address questions. No. No. No.
No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No.
We're gonna answer this question. We're gonna answer
this question. We're gonna answer this question. We're
gonna answer this question. We're gonna answer this
question. The screen or the same order. Okay.
But we'll then speak. We
He's not he's not even yelling. He's he's
asking he's asking normal tone questions, and they
do not like it. It's not the right
moment.
And, again, it's because he knows they won't
call on him anyway, so he's trying to
get a question in. We're asking questions in
a minute. I'm not a pirate plan.
I won't have an opportunity to ask questions
in just a minute. Thanks. True. Now now
our heads it's
So thank you. Alright. So I
have
no
Oh, someone in the chat is saying that
that it it's possible that that,
Max
walked out first
and then Sam was taken. That's interesting. That
may be the case. I don't know why
how that makes sense. I mean, I I
guess, unless it just was a maybe they
maybe they coordinated. I don't know. But just
maybe that's the case it says, on Jimmy
doors what he said. But I can't tell
Yeah. I mean, it doesn't look like I
could see him in there. So maybe that
was the case. Either way, the point is
that they both
basically kind of
spoke in
while blinking was talking, asking questions. And then
Matt Max was already getting up and walking
out, and they kind of, like, escorted him
out. That's the only difference. Whereas, Sam sort
of stood his ground and and made them
drag him out, which is which is what
I would do.
Pleasure in this job and
crossing off a list I carry in my
pocket.
The names of those who've been arbitrarily detained
and unfairly held hostage. He says he basically
whispers to the guy, you don't wanna do
this. You you won't you won't you don't
wanna live your you won't be able to
live with yourself.
I'm just the young hostage and bringing them
home, returning them to their families, returning to
their loved ones.
Finally Get your hands off me. Get your
hands off me. Get your hands off me.
Answer a damn question.
Do you know how to handle this? You
know about Israel's nuclear weapons? Everybody from the
ICJ, I was sitting here quietly, and now
I'm being manhandled by 2 or 3 people.
You you you participate about a free press.
You participate
about a free press. You you are hurting
me. You are hurting me. You are hurting
me. I'm asking questions after being told by
Matt Miller that he will not answer my
questions until I'm asking questions. Respect the matter.
Was it was it was it was it
the opportunity to Was it the IC wasn't
the point of the, 8 the,
May 31st statement to block the ICJ orders?
He blocked the ICJ orders.
You you Please don't respect the process. Thank
you. Oh, respect the process. Respect the process.
Well, everybody
everybody from the from Anthony International.
From Anthony International to the ICJ saying that
as well as doing genocide
and extermination,
and you're telling me to respect the process.
Criminal, why aren't you in the Hague? Why
aren't you in the Hague?
Why aren't you in the Hague?
God. Turn around. I just I honestly Hungry?
I can't I just I can't even express
how angry this makes me. I
I'm
more than usual,
as somebody says in the chat, the land
of the free.
Guys, what the hell are we pretending here?
And, it looks like, Orwell does also confirm
that, that Max went out first. And that
that doesn't really change much of the story.
He still deserves credit for standing up and
speaking out about this. I I just thought
it was more so that it was in
solidarity with Sam. But so the point is,
it's just strange to me. Right? So then,
what I I that's kinda what I thought.
So they went after him. Like, you see
what I'm saying? Like, they chose to go
after Sam. He was again, the main point
here is that he was knowing they weren't
going to call on him because they never
do and they made a clear point to
say that. He I it's on video. I've
showed it before.
That he chooses to ask questions, and that
you get dragged from the room as a
see as a state a seasoned state department
reporter
because you ask questions
that they respect the process. And you hear
what he says? I mean, this is how
we have to think about this. These people
are literally this is not just some some
guy in a suit. These people are committing
genocide. They are knowingly,
knowingly giving weapons to people who are literally
starving and murdering children, gleefully,
posting about it, laughing about it, telling you
there's nobody innocent, and they keep doing it.
They're stopping aid. I mean, guys, these people
know what they're doing
and respect the process.
We're literally watching a genocide play out and
these people are not just allowing it, guys.
They're playing a role in it.
And meanwhile, these cowardly people stand around, some
of them with smirks on their face. You
know why? Because they're not real journalists.
They go along to get along. And that
is the problem because that's how this has
been cultivated. Now young kids grow up thinking
that's what journalism is. Just like we grow
up thinking
an entire lifetime of long going war is
normal.
It's propaganda.
They go along thinking, okay. I wanna be
a journalist, so I have to make sure
I get on the inside. I have to
make sure I don't talk about certain things.
You think it's it's very easy to see.
Here's what I wrote. I said these are
these so called journalists in the room, meekly
standing by as the real journalist is dragged
from the room for asking real questions are
absolute cowards.
Can't risk your access journalism?
You're just plastic resistance, an illusion, and you
know it. Makes me mad.
I really hope this
well, I guess we'll have to wait and
see who is the next person.
And I doubt it will be any better.
Just a different flavor of the same kind
of control.
Ryan Grim has a a breakdown on this.
Just give you some more information on it.
So just before this, Sam Musani and Blinken
had asked Blinken about the Hannibal directive, Israeli
doctrine that says it is better to kill
Israelis rather than to allow them to be
taken hostage, which by the way is a
provable reality.
More than 1, including a colonel and another
aspect of the military, have admitted not just
that it it was the dynamic, but it
was ordered.
It was recovered by Haritz.
And Blinken said he would answer questions later.
There was a back and forth with the
state department official. She said wait to answer
questions, and she said Matt Miller told them
he wouldn't ask Sam's questions. This is the
point. And Sam told her, go away, and
added, I'm not a potted plant. Then the
security came in and let him out. For
what exactly?
For interrupting? And he wasn't just nonstop he
he was quiet. He stopped interrupting. And they
took him out anyway because they're making a
point. You wanna ask real questions? You're not
allowed in this room. And everybody else quietly
sat down.
I wouldn't be able to live with myself
if that was the case.
And even in more outrageous,
here's what CNN said about it.
You heard
he was repeatedly
interrupted by some cringeworthy
heckling
by activists. So we were both sitting here
pretty stunned, frankly. This is supposed to be
a press conference with a room of journalists.
Those were activists.
Oh my god. Like, so look. There's 2
things to think about. Either she's just knowingly
misrepresenting who Sam is, or she didn't even
care to do the most simple due diligence
to find out he is a long term
seasoned state department reporter.
Who's not an activist. He's asking real questions
and they call it activism.
Now, yes, CNN is an effing cartoon, but
you think Fox News is any different, guys,
or any of them on Newsmax or 1
or whatever other left leaning fake alternative media
that's out there? It kills me the way
that they can cover this. And average people
that don't know any better walk away thinking
he's some
that he only was there for his own
personal agenda.
It's sad. We're in a really dangerous place
right now, guys. This country has been just,
I mean, moment by moment, we are rapidly
falling to a minority manipulation.
Who were interrupting the secretary
of state,
when he initially was thinking the press and
and talking about,
the Israeli Hamas deal. Yeah. I I think
it's really surprising. A lot of our viewers
will have seen protests on Capitol Hill, for
example, during confirmation hearings, but it's very rare
for something like that to happen,
at the state department. I I'm over there
all the time in that briefing room, and
and you need to have a reason to
be at the state department. You need to
have an appointment. You need to have press
accreditation
to to come and go. So it's it's
unclear,
who who those people were. So I think
there's a I I mean, are you serious?
No. I mean, I mean, you could maybe
argue that Max Blumenthal, they wouldn't be familiar
with. And even that, I would say, is
a very big stretch.
But Sam Husseini is easily identifiable, and he's
there every I mean, very, very, very frequently.
So my point is they're either choosing to
pretend he doesn't know who he is or
this is how bad they are. It I
mean, or it is research
exists on CNN about as much as it
does on Infowars. I think that's the reality
of this. There's a real security question there.
Allow me to be cheesy for a moment.
This is a testament to American democracy and
the way that American administrations,
approach their press rooms. They give,
accreditation
to a wide number of journalists and My
god.
No. They do not, actually. It's very, very
tightly controlled and accreditation is not required to
be a journalist. That's required for access journalism.
If they wanted this to be a real
journalist dynamic, they would simply just go somewhere
and speak publicly to people that wanted to
join. But, of course, they know what would
happen there. They can't control the flow of
information, so they shut it down.
Increasingly,
what I would call, less mainstream journalists, more
opinion journalists,
who have the opportunity to go to the
State Department, to go to the White House,
and to ask questions. They're trying to do
is use this moment to argue this is
what this is because they let a random
people in.
Almost in a way to go, this is
why we shouldn't let that happen. Right? But
they're not random people. They're seasoned long term
journalists, and this is pathetic.
Of the representatives
of that administration.
So I'm always amazed by whenever I go
to these different press rooms about who's actually
sitting there, it's not just Americans. It's people
from all over the world, from Turkey,
from China, from South Korea who get to
ask questions of people like Matt Miller at
the state department. Yeah. Yeah. And all of
which work for the CIA.
I'm kind of being facetious, kind of. The
point is that we basically know that these
are, these are vetted entities that they know
will only ask very specific types of questions.
Access journalism.
Simple,
guys. It's it's unreal.
So Sam, of course, also points out that
no this is as of 16th, so maybe
it's happened between then. I still doubt it.
No major US new news organizations reached out
to him. Can you imagine that?
Because, I mean, the the it's
trying to think of another example that might
be more known. Like, Matt Lee, I think
is pretty well known. Right? But, like, of
anybody else in this that would be perceived
by them as maybe not somebody who was
criticizing Israel? This would be a hue it
is a huge story. A a a seasoned
state state department journalist was dragged from the
room for asking real questions.
Nobody reached out to them? None of them?
Not left? Not right?
Tells you something. It says, I suspect they
are desperate that the, the public will public
not look at how murderous US government policy
is
or think about what journalism
should be.
Now I had 3 interviews with Sam so
far. I recently reached out to him about
this and said, hey, if you'd like to
come on and and kinda talk about this.
And I think but the general point was
I think there's a reason he's holding off
on it. Just not a lot of them.
And I just I didn't wanna I'd say,
hey, I'm here if you want it. Let
me know. He said something a couple of
weeks. We can connect. So we'll do that.
I just think it's I I just wanna
be there for him. I just I care
about the guy. And I said, look, man.
If you wanna come on and get this
more reach and talk about it, I'm here
for you. So this is December 16, 2022.
Sam Musseini interview, Elon Musk, savior of free
speech or the great digital divider.
You, I'm sure, can guess what his opinion
was, and I think it's important to recognize
that he's right.
Also, on December, September 30, 2023,
seeking truth during an exercise in spin and
obfuscation,
state department briefings. This one, guys, is wildly
relevant to what just happened. Because my main
point in this is I'm I think I
even say it in the opening. Like, how
it is that he's even so loud in
there because he's constantly asking real questions. Not
in a disruptive way other than the time
so far when he has been forced basically
ignored. Like, deliberately so, in in taunted to
the point of telling him he'll be ignored.
But my point was at the time, he
was just simply going, you know, what about
this or pushing back on what Matt Miller
said and then Matt Lee jumps in. And
that Miller, this guy here, mister Smirk Vampire,
very clearly didn't like it. And so my
put my it was interesting that first of
all, the
the the exercise in futility to try to
get answers from people that are designed to
give you BS, but also how it's interesting
that it keeps going. Right? So and here
we are. Right? It's it's prescient in a
way. And then, of course, we also discussed
the vote pact, but this is more relevant
to kinda preview before an election. But it's
a good it's an interesting conversation. He had
an idea about trying to circumvent sort of
the
2 party illusion dynamic.
One way to look at this and it's
called understanding a vote pack and how the
2 party system protects the status quo.
So, keep eye on that guys because it
is an important conversation and Sam definitely deserves
your support.
Now, on the point of of,
cryptocurrency.
Now, this is one thing that I wanted
to include
just because this was actually pretty wild to
me. And I think this is a major
element of the whole Trump rebel illusion falling
apart.
So I just had a great interview with
Mark, Mark Goodwin,
former editor of Bitcoin Magazine. He's working on
a book as I understand it, but he
also writes articles for unlimited hangout.
Really interesting conversation. We recently had a a
great interview with, Mitch Burcham about this same
old conversation. And
honestly, despite having a different opinion
slightly about the origin,
both of them have a very similar opinion
about the fact that this can should and
can still be used to essentially fight back
in some different aspects of it. Now you
can't watch it for yourself to understand the
nuance. This is called was Bitcoin a government
operation and can it still be used to
fight back? It was a very import this
guy is very knowledgeable about the history.
His his knowledge of the timeline, and it's
it's powerful to listen to. Like, he really
strings us together so eloquently and you see
how this has developed right into the Trump
administration and how it alarmingly seems to be
used right now. Trust me. He he's calling
it out, so it's important to hear. But
I wanna include that because it's on the
idea of cryptocurrency more so Bitcoin in the
context of the use, the
anti freedom surveillance artificial intelligence control structure dynamic
that it's being used for. But on that
note,
I wanted to highlight the Trump element of
this that I think is really important to
recognize.
So this happened a while ago. This was
on 20 this is 2024,
October.
He put this video out about World Liberty
Financial, which we've already talked about. It's his
own cryptocurrency
push.
I think,
no. I didn't grab the clip. No. I
did. It's right here. News.
The World of Refinancial
Token Sale is now live.
Crypto is the future.
Let's embrace this incredible technology and lead the
world in digital economy.
Go to world And digital economy.
So, yeah. I mean, that that's pretty general
opinion right now. Right? People see the world's
going in technology. But what's interesting to me
is not even to say good or bad
or disagree or agree.
Just to highlight how many things the current
support structure for Trump
that that very circle would freak out about
if this was Kamal Harris
or anybody other than Trump's circle right now.
And so a the digital direction seems very
important to me. Now first the 2 first
thing is the rollout of World Liberty Financial.
At the time of the idea of digital
currency, when a lot of republicans in general
are just very
and rightly so concerned about cryptocurrency in general.
So it's weird how many things can be
overlooked. Like, keep a tally right now. We're
gonna go through this entire show.
And what's this is what's crazy to me.
I went through this process to find out
for myself. First of all, here's what it
says. Twitter, fact check this. It says, it
whatever, you know, the community notes, the mighty
process that really is. And not even to
say that means it's true, but this is
what the Trump supporting Twitter, Israel supporting entity,
the community notes part on that says.
In the fine print, it notes, which it
does, you can look for yourself, that the
token
is not transferable
and is locked in the wallet.
So you cannot withdraw it until
they write this scheme
sees fit to allow it.
That's true.
That's a wild thing to think about. Right?
So what's crazy to me is, like, they're
they're driving people to get involved in this,
and then it turns out you get this
thing trapped in your wall until they allow
you to use it again. You're spending money
on this. And that's not very clearly netting
as far as I can tell anywhere other
than the fine print. So is this a
trick to get you sucked into the digital
currency dynamic? Is that exactly what they were
saying about everything else before Trump came into
power?
It's amazing what can be ignored.
But that seems pretty deceptive to me if
you want my honest opinion. So here is
the actual thing, shape the new era of
finance finance, b, defiant.
Okay? Well, I went through this to kinda
see, okay, what what would it look like
to try to get some of these? Well,
guess what,
guys? It's everything you might expect from all
the other problems.
1st, they want your verification. Now, to be
clear, this is consistent with a lot of
other crypto platform type stuff. But just to
try to buy one token,
other than to set up a like a
like, on Coinbase, for example, you have to
go through all this dumb stuff too.
But what's interesting is
well, there's 2 things to point out.
In a general sense, the idea of, like,
verification
biometrics
is something that we're all very uncomfortable with.
Largely more so than others, conservatives and republicans,
because of the great reset, because of where
this is going, the technocracy that we're highlighting.
But, of course, when it's something like the
Trump's doing, it's it's okay. Right? But the
problem is the company he's using
is an Israeli company.
It's the same problem, guys.
And it goes right to the idea of
what they call a liveness check.
It's just a fancy way of saying we
need to take your picture and take your
biometrics.
To pretend we're doing it to make sure
you're alive,
which is really not what it's about. There's
plenty of other ways to do that. And
your ID and everything else. And this all
you need all of this just to be
able to buy some of this coin, which
by the way, they get stuck in your
wallet until some later date they allow you
to do something with it. Pretty wild to
me. But let's look at this stuff, guys.
So here is just a basic search. It's
called Sumsub.
Sumsub founded in 2015 by 3 Israeli brothers
as leading identity verification and compliance risk management
platform.
Let's not forget the discussion we had about
Israel's global cybersecurity
infiltration. That's exactly what this is. It is
everywhere,
and it is not something that is benign.
K? It is Israeli intelligence
overlap, just like with Authentics
and Twitter. It's the same thing.
So here's what somebody said back in 2,023.
And this is with different like, different platform.
So right now, the point is Trump's platform
is using Sumsub to take your biometrics to
verify so you can get something that you
apparently can't spend.
Now who else is getting something from that?
Apparently, it's real.
This person says, should we stop using eFAS?
This is a key to digital Maldives. Different
part of the world. And it says the
facial recognition of it is done by an
Israeli company called Sam Sumsub.
Sumsub is also registered in Cyprus with ties
to Russia, so maybe that matters to you
more. Interestingly enough. Right? It says the founders
are Israeli and Russians. It says Sumsub well,
originally, it's 3 Israeli brothers, but it says
Sumsub looks extremely shady. Are we all happy
with sending our faces to them? Why can't
a Maldivian company do it? I'd love to
hope that there's conservatives out there asking the
same question about why this is happening on
Trump's World Financial.
Now I'm not I'm not a fan at
all of Brian Krasenstein, but interesting point, and
it's more about what this person responds to,
but I didn't know about this one. This
is from August 2024.
Apparently, Trump did this really weird rollout of
trumpcollecttrumpcards.com.
And guess what? They're digital
NFT cards.
How many I mean, it's just one after
another, guys. And the point is it says,
this is not AI. This is an ad
from Trump just released trying to profit off
his presidency by selling gimmicky trading cards to
people. But they're digital.
Once again, this is not AI. It's a
real commercial in the midst of of him
running for president. This is not to raise
money for his campaign, but to raise money
for himself. That's all his opinion.
But this guy says full full k, you
know, the k y c is
the rec the verification process. And to they
to buy these trump cards, guess what? You
also have to use some sub to get
verification through an Israeli group to be able
to buy them.
You can't there's that's not an accident.
Are we
it's possible that somebody in his circle is
the one telling him that's the best one,
so use it for all the things you
use. But I think we can recognize there's
something else going on here,
especially with the bigger picture and all that
we've talked about with the overlap of Twitter
and Authentics and the verificate the reality that
they were using your biometrics even though Twitter
didn't need them. Something is out there scooping
this stuff up, and I think that's what
we already know.
The infiltration.
Multiple examples of Trump digital thing over here,
crip cryptocurrency
over there using Israeli
intelligence verification.
This person says, and this is in regard
to a tweet about,
another company using this different part of the
world. It says you're they're they're just having
a conversation about digital identity.
And this guy says verifying ID card legitimacy
is easy. His point is that there are
other ways to do this other than the
some some sub verification point. He says DNR
provides their API to almost every government agency
that needs it. If you look at police
and the Maldives
app, they verify with the identity without e
without Efaz. Efaz is the one using Sumsub.
It says another concern is Efaz shares your
face and ID with an Israeli company known
as Sumsub, which has the right to store
and process that data even further, which is
clear when you look at the company just
like Authentix
on in on Twitter.
There's too much to ignore here.
He also points this out on the 23rd,
2023, October.
Dear e this is the the company, eFAS.
Please reconsider using Sumsub face verification in your
app. The founder and CEO of Sumsub is
from Israel, and it's concerning to know funds
go to funds go from the UK to
Israel. This is post the genocide, mind you.
And it says, Valdez
is more than capable of building their own
liveness check and various verification services. The Maldives
government reportedly paid $900,000
to this company.
The point, guys, let's not forget this is
what's currently happening
on Twitter.
Even though he lied about that, like many
other things that nobody calls out, Nobody. Not
the corporate media, not the mainstream alternative media,
not even other I don't even know anybody
else in the alternative, real media calling this
out. The fact that he came out and
said, we're gonna stop using that. We're gonna
go to Stripe.
And then he didn't, at least in all
cases. Because I've already proven to you every
time at least I go through through this
process, it tries to make me use Authentix.
And others have shown me the same thing.
Meanwhile, simultaneously,
others are showing me that Stripe is presented
to them. How do you make sense of
that? And I'm talking in the same country.
I checked all this.
So if you don't remember, Authentix is a
Israeli intelligence company. It's not even just a
tangential side. This is a group that currently
works with a huge portion of Israeli intelligence.
And
Elon Musk randomly decides to use that to
take your biometric data that they currently do
not need, even though it lists that they
can keep that data.
Israel.
Just it's terrifying with what we know about
what they're doing with Palantir and artificial intelligence
and what's going on in with Lavender and
Havasura in Gaza where they're murdering people. It's
all so I again, I've said this many
times. I don't think we fully understand what
this will mean in 20 years, in 5
years.
Digital twins. I mean, guys, this is a
terrifying thing, and they're scooping this stuff up
like crazy.
Here is, Censored Man talking about this.
He says before verifying your ID with Authentix
on x, read this thread, and I recommend
you do. It's not just about that. He
he had he worked with CHEQ to supposedly
fight the bots and that overwhelmed this platform
with Israeli bots.
I think they know what they're doing.
Lastly, you might have just seen this. This
was came out yesterday. Another one. Totally different
one. He says, my new official Trump meme
is here.
It's time to celebrate everything we stand for.
And this is another Trump MAGA coin meme
cryptocurrency.
And you get this guy saying, did did
he get hacked? No. No. He's just leaning
in to the to the very thing that
most of his base doesn't seem to really
wanna support. And I don't mean just, like,
cryptocurrency. I mean, like, this whole movement, the
digital currency, and the whole thing. It's very
concerning.
Now another aspect of this, and we're in
this whole first section is about the partisan
kind of manipulation. I just pointed this out
today. And I just felt the need to
make this case even clearer because of how
it continued.
Now, this is fascinating to me. Now, I
wasn't familiar with this guy before this. His
name is Hussle, b I t c h.
And he said, breaking.
Even though okay. They love to do that
even though it's been reported, like, 45 times
and all you know, whatever else. But breaking
from my channel, lithium plant just discovered by
Los Angeles fire officials in the fire areas.
And he goes, and there it is. Maui
2 point o. Another land grab. Don't second
guess this. Just blindly believe it. That that's
what they're doing. Except for the fact that
inside the video itself, which by the way
oh my god. Check this out. This is
hilarious.
They just took this away. You could still
see it there.
I had this open still.
Check this out. It says the video this
is community note. This video from the fire
official clearly states this is not a mine,
but an underground lithium bicycle battery storage facility.
Not even a remote connection. It's a location
where they store bicycle batteries that happen to
be lithium.
That it's not even so he started to
post a land grab dynamic for a lithium
mine. What's what I'm noticing now for the
podcast is they've already removed that from this
on Twitter. It's not there anymore.
Let's refresh it and see if it comes
back.
This just shows you oh, there. Okay. Now
it came back. But isn't that interesting? See,
you guys caught that. See, this is the
kind of stuff that Twitter does. That's why
this has 1,700,000
views despite the video being, if you listen
to the first 10 seconds, he says a
storage facility for batteries. So this guy either
didn't even watch the video and got it
and shared it to somebody else, or knowingly
lied to you. I think it's the latter
because he did it again.
But so this is what we get to
see, and you get to see I I
I just did the quotes.
Endless.
Major accounts. This is my point. This got
the reason it got 2,000,000 views despite I
think it's got 80,000 followers is because it
got propped up by the inner circle.
Exactly who you might think. And look.
Everyone in here doing the same thing.
This is not about this this, like, you
know, this one's doing the same thing the
other guy did by saying that it's not
the lithium that he's pretending is there, even
though it's not, is the cover story. It's
about none of it is. It's not real.
He lied about it.
But land grab. Hashtag land grab. Everyone's doing
the same thing. And if you scroll down,
you get major accounts. Borderline 1,000,000 followers saying,
look at that. We knew it. That's what
the fires were for.
None of them can do either watch the
video or even look at the comments or
the comment in the notes.
The the only point we made here is
that this is being cultivated on this platform.
In no way does that mean this is
that the platform should stop or that they
should censor people, but it's important to recognize
this is not organic. It's not a free
speech platform when you are literally, like, algorithmically,
socially engineering people to become what they claimed
you would become.
And I don't even think it's the majority,
guys. I think they're just playing into very
certain grifters like the E. Miles Chong's of
the world that will lie and then go
the exact opposite direction because Elon said the
second the next thing the other day. One
day, she's the best person for the job,
and then all of a sudden he doesn't
like her, and all of a sudden now
she's the worst on a dime. So it
means you don't even have opinions of your
own. You just parrot what he says because
you're making 100 of 1,000 of dollars. That's
not an that's not a hyperbolic statement, guys.
These people have 100 of
excuse
me. 100 of 1,000 of followers, like with
Laura Loomer, for example, that got released on
that
Spaces,
and they're making,
I mean, if if it's at least a
dollar each, that's over $200,000.
That's crazy. Every month. That's why they bowed
back to the table and went back in
the group. My point though, guys, is this
didn't stop. So here he is saying this
then,
and here's the next one. January 17th. He
says breaking. Evacuations under order in California as
toxic smoke spreads from what?
Massive lithium
battery plant fire.
Oh, so you added battery
to the lie
as if that would make it maybe go
a little bit further. No. He's lying, guys.
As I said, it's a lithium battery storage
facility, not a plant. As you already know,
since even community notes called this out on
your last attempt to mislead people, all this
does is hide the very real crimes taking
place probably by design.
Is all I mean, the point is the
government that you think you're fighting for, guys,
on the team sport side of this, you
think they want to fight all these things?
No. What they're doing is getting you to
jump over the point so you miss anything.
It doesn't change.
You get all caught in the start, drones
and fog and everything else, and you miss
what's actually happening even if those are real
stories, and ultimately miss accountability,
whether for Lahaina, whether for East Palestine, whether
for this location itself. Even if it's just
malfeasance or just lack of not caring about
people suffering.
But there's the thing right there.
No engagement though. Because that's how that works.
So this what's interesting though, this one only
has
155,000,
which should probably keep going up. My point
though is that somebody decided to tap this
one. Somebody, all the ones we were showing
you, jumped this in the air, and that's
why it got almost 2,000,000 views. But he
keeps grifting.
No community notes there.
These are just blatant lies, guys. These and
this is the kind of circle that's being
propped up by Elon Musk.
Now I wanted to read this. It's a
pretty short article. I wrote this back in
2016.
Now this this was the I've referenced this
more than once, actually.
I titled this the divide of the uninformed,
a manipulation of a nation. Now, I'm sure
people might I'm not I don't want this
is not directed to anybody specific,
but I'm sure somebody out there might feel
like I'm aiming at. I'm I'm there's nobody
in my mind when reading this. But my
point is, we know what this how before
this year,
there was a huge portion of this country
that just didn't barely even engage with this
process. And it's all and I don't know
where we're at now based on the numbers.
I don't even know how we can trust
the numbers at any point. But as gen
generally, there was always 40 something percent of
the people that just didn't even engage.
And I think that was what that's what
got tapped into
when Trump started saying 911,
JFK,
lock her up, and the Fed. All these
things that people went, what? That's not this
is this is conspiracy theory. Like, it sure
it changed the conversation.
And now he's doing it again with a
little bit different slant.
Guess we can't learn our lesson. That's my
opinion. But I wanted to read this because
it's amazing how relevant this is now,
even though I wrote in 2016.
It says, as the American people began to
closely examine the shroud that has been pulled
over their eyes,
seeing the veneer of misinformation that has been
cast over the country's exponential and perpetual profiteering
and warmongering,
They slowly awaken to the prospect that in
its simplest terms, they've been lied to.
The country is in the midst of a
massive awakening,
and I believe that. I think that's why
a lot of this is happening.
And the average and I don't mean, by
the way, the right wing side of it.
I mean, the nonpartisan objective awakening to things
that are uncomfortable for the government, not one
side or the other. And that's why this
division tactics exploded and why we're being rushed
into technocracy,
which has been a long term plan, I
argue. But nonetheless, it's being it seems rushed.
And I said, and the average person is
being confronted with a choice.
Address the looming dark realization that their reality
is not what it seems, or double down
on the comforting lie
and brace for the consequences.
With the level of information being thrown at
the public in today's battle for the American
mind, it is no wonder why,
no wonder many have chosen the latter.
It is a far easier path to stick
with what's familiar, however sinister it may be.
As Aldous Huxley predicted, people are being overwhelmed
with so many conflicting narratives that many are
choosing to stick with what they believe they
know.
That despite the the pressing feeling that they
are being misinformed, at least they can feel
good about themselves,
or so they are told they're they are
told to believe. It has almost become another
form of religion.
Memorize the talking points.
Spread the talking points.
Have faith that you are on the right
side.
It really feels that way, doesn't it?
What this has produced is an entire class
of Americans who have been convinced that they
are informed, in quotes,
whose attention
prior to this election cycle was scarcely directed
at much more than the latest reality TV
scandal. In essence, that is what this past
election was turned into, a crazy reality show.
This was ingenious
as those caught by the similarities of the
2 are slowly turned on to the new
reality show, American politics.
This has awakened a dumb sleeping giant waiting
to be pointed in the right direction. These
are the very same individuals screaming at rallies
that Trump will end the world. Or conversely,
yelling that we need to make America great
again, with no conception of how that is
to be done or what it even means.
As if those that have been politically active
prior to the new shiny political show have
been just sitting on their hands waiting for
this amazing slogan to come along and give
Americans the insight that they've been waiting for.
In reality, they're simply parroting what they were
told at their chosen pulpit and aggressively defending
these falsehoods with no real understanding of the
surrounding dynamics and why they have the position
that they are claiming to hold.
When confronted with contrasting information, even while attempting
to have a civil discussion, these are the
individuals who quickly get agitated and lash out.
Throwing out terms like un American or conspiracy
theorist, these are the preconditioned responses to any
idea that even slightly contradicts their treasured gospel
truth.
Hope you're clearly seeing that this is both
sides of the paradigm. Now it says the
past election cycle,
with its supposed anti establishment candidates, has completely
changed what was previously a political insider's game.
Now that doesn't sir necessarily have to be
on this one election, but I think over
a process. But it says, with rising support
for outside the box candidates such as Donald
Trump, the country has witnessed a rise in
the previously voiceless and currently uninformed.
The sudden arrival of this previously silent 40%
who chose not to grace the nation with
their opinions in previous years,
some by opting out of the voting process
in protest,
caused a staunch divide within the American populace
due almost entirely
to the incendiary rhetoric being spouted by those
they have risen in defense of.
Whether these supposed anti establishment presidential potentials are
genuine
in their intentions or just more Manchurian candidates
with designs to continue business as usual,
a clear divide has arisen. Now that's always
been there. But you know what I'm talking
about. This moment that shifted from, well, we're
just difference in opinion to you're the enemy
because you hold a different opinion.
This invigorated a previously non existent, quote, middle
class, if there is still such a thing,
to come out in droves to cast their
votes for whomever their favorite program told them
they were smart for already thinking about picking.
It was nothing more than intentional vile
in intentional validation of preexisting preconceived ideas. No
real critical thinking involved.
This was by design.
Some feel they were that some some feel
that the intention was to siphon enough
votes away from the other potential candidates using
Trump and Sanders to allow for what was
clearly the establishment hopeful, Hillary Clinton, to easily
fall into office as the obvious lesser of
2 evils. Yet,
despite the legitimacy of that claim, no one
actually informed was able to call Clinton the
lesser of any evil, let alone the best
choice. It was certainly argued that she was
a better option,
and it all hinged on whether one felt
the scandal surrounding Clinton were political hype or
legitimate crime.
With all of the continued chaotic aftermath, it
should now be quite clear that it was
the latter. I think everybody knows that. But
it says it would seem the laughable idea
of literally choosing the lesser of 2 evils,
this is written in 2016,
to represent the American people and stand as
commander in chief of the largest military force
in the planet is now this country's democratic
status quo.
And yet again, we saw it last time.
As supposed as as supposed,
as opposed free individuals,
it is hard to address this fact and
not come away feeling cheated.
So most ignore
the whole thing, taking solace in the fact
that it at least they got to choose
between the 2.
But did they?
Time and again, it has been shown in
this country that the electoral college, the system
that is used to dole out votes after
they've been cast, is anything but democratic and
clearly compromised.
Kurt now this is at the time, this
might have changed since I wrote this 2016.
Currently, that in 24 different states, the electoral
college does not even have to vote for
the candidate who wins the popular vote. They
can literally vote for whoever they want despite
what the people have chosen. Now we've seen
many examples of this. Whether we're talking about
the DNC RNC dynamic or the electoral college
after the votes, both have had examples where
they either when it gets exposed, eventually argue
why that's it shows you where the real
power lies. It says take that into account
with gerrymandering and superdelegates,
manipulated voting machines, and it becomes very clear
that this system is cleverly disguised as a
democracy,
but quite far from being 1, if that's
even what we should want.
Some feel that this invigoration and divide of
the previously uninformed was created
in order to garner the type of violence
and unrest being witnessed in all political arenas
at the current stage. Now that one really
stood out to me with where we are.
Because I wrote that at the time just
kinda thinking, well, because, you know, it's causing
chaos. It's causing division. But look at what
I've been talking about recently.
Right? The idea that this is like, or
like what Weinstein said about the before like,
that both sides were basically fanning the flames
of the most radical elements and both sides
pretending like neither one existed.
Like, it or rather, of their own side.
That's I mean, think about that. And what
you ended up with was the the elements
that were the most ridiculous, the lowest common
denominator getting radicalized and fanned the most,
and we saw this play out.
Now, who does that benefit?
Think about it. It says the end goal
being a push to an obvious need for
more control, more government, more, more, more. It's
where we are right now. And ultimately, the
big aversion for most of the uninformed,
the New World Order.
Or a One World Government, which has been
openly discussed and is a genuine agenda. Funny
how that's being ignored right now from most
of the Republicans that have previously called it
out. Conclusion.
Whether one chooses to listen to the obvious
bias based media or an independent source, not
following up that observation with research of one's
own
is not truly being informed,
but just taking another's word for it.
Should one really bank their future and the
future of this country on the thoughts and
potential ulterior motives of another?
The only way
to truly be informed is for one to
take it upon themselves to not only research
a topic they wish to understand, but to
actually understand the topic.
And not just repeat what was last heard
as one's personal opinion.
Do not be another manufacturer tool of those
pulling the strings. Do not allow yourself to
be distracted and beguiled by the proverbial bells
and whistles of the current political theater.
Take it upon yourself
to understand the true inner workings of the
US government as best you can, and know
when action must be taken and when it
is in the best interest of the American
people for that action to be avoided.
Crazy to me how
I mean, I could've wrote that yesterday, guys.
It's where we are.
Now with that in mind,
right, the partisan game is being played. And
rapidly finding conservatives
seeing through the illusion on their own side,
which, by the way, I think a lot
happened during COVID 19 and left as well.
People that are disillusioned about the entire thing
they've thought they were fighting for. We're this
is why I think we're here. We need
to start standing back and recognizing you have
more in common with the person you perceive
as the villain on the Democrat side or
the Nazi on the red, whatever it is.
You guys are actually more in line with
than the elitist, technocrats, Zionist,
deep state contractors that you pretend are the
rebels
on either side of this.
You have more in common with your fellow
American people than you will ever have with
Biden or Trump or Musk or any of
them. Now Sal Diagoras says and we're gonna
go through some examples here of things that
should stand out to you as obvious problems.
He says, congrats, MAGA. Now we have 2
tax collection agencies. Are you tired of winning
yet? And if you haven't seen this, Trump
says he will create an external
revenue service
agency to collect tariff income.
I mean, how is that even I mean,
the the this, first of all, is not
something that we should make a common practice.
Like, you realize this is
financial manip you're this is the game they
play, and usually the economic side of things
like this is what lead to real war.
And this ultimately, the tariffs are attacks that
ultimately come back to make you spend more
money for the benefit of their political dynamic.
Overall,
how is it their right to be able
to argue they can send external revenue service?
I mean, because they think they run the
world. This is the beginning of what you
argue is the global governance IRS.
Think about it.
Everything they seem to be doing is expanding
more territory, more influence, more control, more technocracy,
more digital identification. All of it is expanding
in exactly the direction of what everyone claims
they're fighting. But I guess it doesn't matter
because Trump won't do that, will he? Because
we know. We know him. We know what
he thinks and feels, don't we all?
I hope we're smarter than that.
Now here's an interesting one. And I'm just
kinda starting on the smaller end.
Hollywood is an interesting conversation, isn't it? Especially
as Elon Musk is kind of reflexively lurching
over and look over there and pedophiles in
the UK, which, yes, yes, we've been calling
that for decades, Elon Musk. But the point
is, in here,
Hollywood is a very problematic discussion in this
country
around the exact conversation that they can't stop
pointing elsewhere about.
Now that doesn't mean you have to say
all Hollywood bad. You can make your own
opinions about it. But all I'm simply doing,
again, it's the major point, is not good
or bad or agree or not, is that
the point is if this was about
Kamala Harris doing this, even with the same
exact people,
it would be called
a problem.
Trump names Gibson, Stallone, Voigt, now whatever you
think about him, that's not the point, As
special envoys to Hollywood.
And I simply said to make Hollywood bigger,
better, and that's what he says in here.
Trump says on, truth social, he wants to
do this to make Hollywood bigger, better, and
stronger than ever before.
I just simply said, to make Hollywood bigger,
better, and stronger than before,
Funny how Trump fighting deep state sure looks
an awful lot like the exact same thing
as before with the republican slant.
Or how about meeting with Bill Gates?
And literally talking about
operation work fee 2.0 as Alex Jones puts
it.
Now the best you're gonna get from them
right now is this kind of reactive, like,
assuming that that Gates is lying or something
or misrepresenting them. Guys, we have every indication
out of other than what they want you
to believe about what he wants to do.
Look at the history.
Look at everything they've had. Last administration, he
listened to Gates instead of RFK Junior.
Right? So now we have Gates going again
to meet him and having this 3 hour
long conversation where they're talking about exactly what
conservatives are are screaming we should be fighting,
and we should be fighting.
I just don't even know how this is
possible where you could have a meeting with
Bill Gates.
Again, you could argue that's not even a
problem.
My point is that you know, conservatives or
Republicans specifically,
this is a huge problem, and it should
be because Gates is a problem in general.
But if this was Joe Biden or Kamala,
they would never this would be, how are
you letting this happen? Look. We knew it.
They're part of the deep state. They're part
of the great reset. Yes. That's a fair
thing to consider.
Hopefully, they'll do the same here.
We met with Donald Trump since the election.
Yeah. I had a chance to go have
a
a long and actually quite
intriguing dinner with him. What did you discuss?
What was intriguing?
Well, we touched on a lot of things.
It was over 3 hours to my surprise.
It was, you know, just he and I,
his chief of staff, Susie Wiles, and the
person who helps
manage things for me, Larry Cohen. So the
4 of us sat there and,
was quite wide ranging. You know, global health's
the area that I work in and
such amazing things have happened and can happen
there.
I spoke a lot about HIV
and that the foundation's literally working on a
a cure for that. We're at an early
What do you think that is?
It's not a secret. It's mRNA.
Stage. And so, you know, he
in the COVID days,
accelerated the vaccine innovation. So I, you know,
was asking him
if maybe the same kind of thing could
be done here, and we both got, I
think, pretty excited about that. Now, I mean,
obviously, you could point out that that might
not be how Trump presents that. Or to
be objective, maybe Trump presented excitement and was
doing that just to play Bill Gates.
But that's just being objective, obviously.
Right? But what's interesting about it, it was
the same point. It doesn't matter how this
play if this was being presented the same
way, it would be a no matter what
they said, no matter what Kamal said the
next day about how I didn't really say
that, they wouldn't care.
That's the point we made here. One after
another, you're getting examples of things that show
you a huge problem that is being ignored
by the people who would call it out
anywhere else.
We talked about polio.
Of course, you did. Where, you know, we're
very close to getting that done. But
if you if you stop,
it'll spread back.
And so I explained
why it's been tough in Pakistan, Afghanistan.
We've had cases show up in Gaza. We
have case Yeah. Yeah. Because they're giving them
oral oral polio vaccines
that cause polio. And if you actually don't
even know that story, it's literally covered by
Associated Press. It's they'll tell you it's an
it's an oral vaccine strain
that has continued to spread, and I just
I guess just leave that out.
But guess Trump's gonna help him with that.
He's in Africa, and he was fascinated to
hear
what he could do to
maximize the chance that during the next 4
years that incredible milestone will be achieved. I
felt like he was,
you know, energized and,
you know, looking forward to helping to drive
innovation. You know, I I was I was
frankly impressed with how well he showed a
lot of interest in,
the issues I I brought up.
Now, obviously, you could point out, right, that
everybody has an interest in trying to suck
up to the person who's gonna be president.
Right? So Bill Gates probably whether I mean,
simply just to be objective, you can argue
that it may not be what it appears
to be. That's certainly fair. But that's not
something you should decide right now because we
don't know. So right now, it could be
just as damning as you might think. And
it also could be that he's misleading you
somehow.
Until we find out more, like, when Trump
responds or whatever else, right now, it's exactly
what it looks like. He met with Gates,
and and Gates told you they talked about
vaccines, polio, and all these things that should
really stand out to you as a red
flag.
Even meeting him with him, quite frankly, seems
like a red flag. Now this is the
post. You can see this. It's from, where
was the date on? You can't I don't
know why these stupid short the way they
show these in shorts is so frustrating.
This is new, by the way. They the
reason I'm saying that is because I think
the oh, you know what? I think, I
I have an example right here.
Oh, I guess not.
I was what I was gonna say is
underneath it, somebody had posted the screenshot with
the actual date on this, which is, like,
the it's it's very recent.
I'm trying to see if there's a spot
right there.
But anyway so but just so it's clear,
despite the weird pushback from people going, that's
not new because that's the that's what you
do. Right? Or that that's old is rather
what they're saying.
Is that you reflexively
dismiss what you don't want to be the
case. But it's it is new and it
did just happen.
Okay? And and this tape shows you anyway.
So this is from January 17th. Bill Gates
had intriguing 3 hour dinner with Trump. I
was frankly impressed.
Interesting that this is the one of the
platforms that we usually kind of go after
him, but weirdly just kind of reports very
benignly what was said. And it says, I
spoke a lot about HIV and that Gates
Foundation is literally working on a cure for
that. Yeah. We know, and that's very concerning.
Early stage and and he's in the early
stages, and so he in the COVID days
accelerated the vaccine innovation. Yes. He did. Despite
the people trying to pretend that's not the
case. He is Operation Warp Speed. And it
says, so I was asking him if maybe
the same kind of thing could happen here.
You heard all that. I says, we're excited
about the poll we're talking the polio vaccine
and getting that done. Just crazy. Now this
says, Gates, who also met with Trump back
in 2016, ahead of his first presidential term,
is the latest billionaire to dine with Trump
in the wake of the of the election.
Yeah. Just like last time, he influenced him
and seems to have changed his mind. On
top business other top business leaders,
Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg,
total good guys on the side of the
not deep state. Right? Or the literal example
of what we would argue is exactly that.
But, you know, you guys can decide yourselves.
But here is Trump news.
Now this is it's not so small this
is a huge account. It's got 1,000,000 followers.
So I wouldn't I don't know if it's
necessarily verifiably, like, connected to their administration,
but they're pro Trump. Let's put it that
way. And then somebody say, will you support
Bill Gates working in president Trump's new administration?
Yes or no? Like, the fact that they're
even framing that question
is crazy
With the with the grossest picture of Bill
Gates.
But if you read down below, guys, I
mean, I don't see a single a single
response that says, yes. Good. But you will
get some weird ones, though, from the inner
circle that are starting to try to normalize
that, which is already beginning.
But here's the funny part,
as you can expect.
So this is just so this happened. Right?
So we the same clip where he's speaking
about the meeting.
Because the obvious problem for those that are
not ridiculous, I was like, well, that's that's
a huge red flag that anybody else would
most conservatives are going, what? Like, they're first
going, that kid is probably not real. They
probably lied or what? Like, their their their
minds are blowing. Right? And so he goes,
breaking.
Nightmare development.
So Bill Gates claims
claims president Trump made back Operation Warranty 2.0.
Now fair enough. He did say he said
it, but that's meant to kind of go,
might not be true.
Which there's no re the only reason you
would even for one moment think that is
because you don't want it to be true.
There's nothing in the world right now that
indicates that it's not true. We only have
one point for Bill Gates after meeting with
him that indicates that it is. So you
can wait to hear Trump's point, but there's
no reason to, you know, other than just
to hope that it's not real. You see
what I'm saying? So
he go and he goes, and with the
rollout of experimental HIV, AIDS, mRNA vaccine, yes.
I mean, are we pretending that Trump's not
pro mRNA? He is. So is Elon Musk,
so is Vivek, so is Vance, so is
Thiel.
I think Alex Jones has a very clear
vested interest in just making that muddied. But
he goes on to say at the meeting
3 weeks ago at Mar a Lago, Gates
claims Trump showed interest in support of Big
Pharma's agenda of rolling out untested certifiably dangerous
gene therapy vaccine. Yeah, man. He did that.
He still, right this moment, supports that thing.
I mean, you're you're obfuscating truth is what
his job seems to be. Let's not forget,
this was pretty recent with Candace Owens. But
he has said this right up until the
last time he spoke about it. He still
supports the injection as a life saving tool.
I don't know how anybody gets past that.
More people have died under COVID this year,
by the way, under Joe Biden Right. Than
under you. And more people took the vaccine
this year, so people are
I always like to point out as last
time I played this, Candace Owens is clearly
trying to set him up to kick the
can down the road.
To basically say, yeah. Well, you know, Biden
killed more died under him, and I didn't
really push it. He didn't do that though.
He jumped over the top and tried to
go, but it was a good, now it
was good. And she just kinda goes, yeah.
Mhmm. And she lets it go. Watch again.
Listen it again, and you'll see what I
mean. She was trying to give him a
leading question that would allow him to make
make it look like he wasn't still supporting
it. And what people have died under COVID
this year, by the way, under Joe Biden
Right. Than under you. And more people took
the vaccine this year. So people are questioning
how What did the vaccine work? But Yeah.
Some people aren't telling you. The ones Yeah.
Yeah. No. No. It didn't. And she doesn't
think that. Very interesting how you win you
know, maybe like the,
Andrew Tate interview. Right? Sometimes you just don't
push back.
Maybe that's what she thinks. No. You always
do. If you're a journalist, you don't let
things like that go. But, you know, especially
with absolute human trafficking trash like Andrew Tate
or a genocidal,
like every US president
or a authoritarian monster. But the point is,
it's important to see that that
whole punch.
Vaccine work, but Yeah. Some people aren't telling
you. The ones the ones that get very
sick and go to the hospital are the
ones that don't take their vaccine. Nope.
But it's still their choice.
And if you take the vaccine, you're protected.
Nope. The the results of the vaccine are
very good. And if you do get it,
it's a very minor form. Right. These are
all lies. Every single person who supports Trump
knows that.
Unlike other than the ones that just blindly
believe that what he said, despite the rest
of their community going, that's it's it I
don't I just real this this is the
one thing of all of it that I
just can't understand.
I this is what convinces me that we're
dealing with some high level, I mean or
whatever you wanna call it. We're dealing with
not just propaganda, but, like, something
deeper than that. How you can get around
that, I have no idea.
But he goes, Bill Gates knows the truth
about the origins of COVID and the incredibly
dangerous nature of his Franken shots coming up.
The same ones Trump supports, bud.
Now he's desperately trying to suck Trump into
his orbit. Like, all he's trying to do
is try to blame the Gates is manipulating
he is on board with what he's doing.
They both still support the same thing you
keep trying to lump lump onto Gates. He's
just as responsible.
It says in this emergency message to president
Trump, Jones demands a clarification.
Right. I almost feel like they're starting to
box it out of their circle, but it's
interesting. He says, and the incoming Trump administration
on whether or not Bill Gates is lying
or admit that Trump to join or admit
that Trump joined the dark side. He just
he he tries to do this where he
makes it seem like he's willing to do
that and then never does. He'll make a
video 30 seconds later about pre how Trump
is the greatest thing ever to brace the
to, you know, to grace the world. Same
thing with Elon Musk or whatever else.
The issue constitutes an ultimate litmus test on
whether Trump is on team humanity or team
death cult.
This is silly. These are cartoonish, guys. The
way that they frame this stuff, it's it's
it's it's funny. But so the point is
it continues. Oh, oh, by the way, I'll
include this for those that you haven't seen
it. Just the same clips I was just
showing about the injection, as well as the
biometric thing I'll show you in a second.
Oh, and then these 2 down here, by
the way. Shutting the Internet up for Bill
Gates, which he already said, as well as
take the guns, do process later, you know,
similar stuff. Or, you know, hey, you wanna
burn the flag? Go go to jail. Despite
that being a violation of free speech. All
huge red flags that have been ignored. But
next, same thing.
He repackages the one, puts a little another
tweet on, and says Bill Gates is floating
the idea that Trump is under his control.
Well, no. You're still talking about the same
clip. There's nothing new. You're just kind of
evolving this narrative.
He didn't insinuate anything. He just said they're
talking. You're trying to patch a narrative based
on your own first assumption that it's now
Gates kind of surreptitiously. You're trying to make
it look like Trump is being played. That's
the best you can do.
Right? That's that's the same meme. Forty chess
master but somehow fell to all the victims
of all his bad advisers.
Same thing. He's playing Trump. Yeah. You don't
know anything else. You're not on the inside
of this conversation. You don't know what they're
talking about. You don't know what they said.
You're playing a role.
And it goes on, same thing. Then on
this quoting the same thing, from the same
one, one after another, it says, do you
think president Trump should be meeting with Bill
Gates?
Woah. Okay. Woah. Hold on. That's a big
change in tone. First, it was what? Now
we have to you're the team. You're this
is your litmus test to whether you're on
our side. Now we're going, well, let's take
a step back. Maybe he should be. Maybe
you think he should.
Okay. Let's keep going. Next, it goes on
to say, Bill Gates is impressed by Trump.
They quoted him and says, I'm sure I
sure hope Trump doesn't make a statement about
this because Gates is one of the most
evil people who ever live. Okay. Just keep
remember all this stuff. Because when it inevitably
comes to pass where Trump is working with
him or whatever the overlap is, this will
be put aside, and they'll continue to make
a reason for why it's okay.
That's my prediction. It's what happens every time
before it. Same thing here. Do you think
Bill Gates is lying?
Trump needs to make a statement ASAP to
clarify the point is, these are, like, every
15 minutes. And it's the same clip, and
the same show, whatever.
It's all propaganda punching this into your face.
The point is to make it seem like
he's pushing back on it. It's all my
opinion.
And then, of course, this is the important
stuff. Right? He goes and this is a
joke. It's an obvious altered picture, and I
don't think he thinks it's real. And if
he does, that's even more embarrassing. But he
goes, you can say what you want about
the Obamas, but you have to admire the
fact that they have a great marriage. It's
candid family photos like this one that make
them admire me. No. It's obviously he's joking.
He's pretending that's,
what's her name?
Obama's wife. I'm suddenly blanking on her name.
But the point is, it's just it's, you
know, it's only one thing, and yes, he's
talking about other things. But if you look
at his thread,
none of it's addressing the problems. None other
than Gates is a problem. But we're not
talking about the shot. We're not talking about
the globalism rolling out, the technocracy, all the
things that he otherwise pretends to fight. And
this person just goes with Alex Jones right
now. People are really starting to notice APAC's
control, and he's over here going, I have
a 400 gigabyte of Michelle Obama penis proof.
I mean, it's again,
let's just say for sake of conversation, oh,
it's Michelle. It's Michelle Obama is a man.
That's this whole game this whole conversation they're
playing with.
Is that relevant to the larger conversation we're
dealing with right now? It's it's actually
it's it's tabloid stuff. Sure. If they had
proof, it's interesting. But is that a focal
point? It becomes when they want you to
look elsewhere. And I'm seeing this constantly. This
kind of stuff is about distraction
from stuff like this.
Can you imagine being in this position and
not talking about this? Trump getting a running
start at fighting the deep state by speaking
at the Davos event for the World Economic
Forum.
Mhmm.
All winds up. Nothing to see here.
Donald Trump
says he will take part in the Davos
meeting virtually for the World Economic Forum.
I mean, how many different things can we
actually ignore?
Now, I mean, again, look. I'm I'm not
even saying the point is maybe he thinks
he can go and change them. Maybe he
thinks he can make it all better. Maybe
he can get them on the side of
team humanity or whatever you wanna make it
out to be. I'm not pretending that I
know any more than you. But I still
think it's wild that this gets ignored by
the people who have rightly identified the World
Economic Forum and any connection to it as
a major problem.
And barely talking about this.
Isn't that wild to you? I just think
that's wild.
And
back to the global's in point. It's kind
of where he says, from MAGA to mega,
make Europe great again.
Now, I mean, it's just a it's just
a tweet. It doesn't mean they're good, but
I just think it's hilarious. Like, this at
UK and over there and and make
why is this the point? And how does
that not seem weirdly disjointed with what we're
all talking about? And I just said, what
was that about America First again? Hashtag globalism.
Silly.
And I'll include the show where we talk
about this recently as Israel's globalist ambitions become
clear, TeamSport Republicans endorse the North American Union
under the guise of, like, freedom cities and
take Greenland because we're gonna they wanna join.
It's just expansionism, guys. This is imperialist, and
this is everything we tell we they claim
they're fighting.
Go through the show. It's shockingly clear. David
Eich points this out. This is the historic
conversation from the North American Union point to
into the agenda 21 to 23rd. It's all
the same thing. Sustain there's the clip of
the sustainable development goals with the same map.
Can you imagine not calling that out after
spending a career of making this the point
that we're supposed to stop and all of
a sudden it starts to happen and you
just point to something else?
As c s sevens
or sorry.
7 c's points out.
We're using the same clip of Bill Gates
down here. He says, Bill Gates is excited
to work with Trump.
Zuckerberg is excited to work with Trump. These
are all, by the way, public statements. Netanyahu
is excited to work with Trump. We'll get
there. Trump will be speaking at the Davos
WEF meeting after his inauguration.
Trump is working with Larry Fink on economic
policy. He is. That's that's BlackRock.
Trump is appointing a George Soros banker to
run the treasury. Again,
he simply says wake up.
Wild, isn't
it? Wild, what can be ignored?
Now it it can extension of the same
point, but this gets into a much darker
agenda
that is clearly been building for a long
time. Now this overlaps with a a few
different things that that we've been talking about
a lot. Whether we're talking about the kind
of the revitalization of the 911 Al Qaeda,
like dark winter anthrax dynamic,
Or the
vanilla Isis biological overlap that we have been
talking about for a long time.
Like, just the inevitable intersection of these agendas
that clearly work for them. And here it
is. It's developing in front of you. So
this is Kristi Noem, one of the many
we've talked about that is a wildly pro
Israel, Zionist backer of Trump in his administration.
She says, Homeland Security used to work more
closely with the CIA.
Right. Because that's fine in the deep state,
isn't
it? Let's say is,
the cybersecurity and intelligence
elements that we have within the Department of
Homeland Security have been incredibly siloed.
They have not communicated with other intelligence agencies
like they should and partnered.
INA has some interaction,
but not enough, and we also need to
have CISA have interaction with the FBI, CIA
to make sure they're working together to type
stop these types of threats and identify when
they're growing
among our citizens and how they've even read
it. Fired.
America Court, CISA, and the CIA. These are
all good freedom things. Right? It's all about
fighting for liberty.
Incredible.
Absolutely incredible. All I simply said was, at
this point,
either most conservatives secretly root for the deep
state, or we are about to see a
waterfall of conservatives call out the Trump administration.
I just don't see how this in any
way aligns with what most were aggressively claiming
they absolutely knew was about to happen.
It's wild to me. And I think the
reality is or or or on top of
that is that Trump himself just recently made
a similar point.
As you remember,
the CIA must get involved now before it's
too late, citing the same thing. Now remember,
this all kind of overlaps with the drone
point, which I'll make another point again about
this, about hyping the idea of searching for
nuclear material,
which has already been community noted from Alex
pointing that out. The point though, guys, is
this is about the overlapping thing. The drones,
the weird fog point, they're all trying to
build this narrative, which by the way, as,
Matt covered in his recent article. Matt Ehret.
It overlapped with the UFO point too. Don't
forget, they were all jamming this together from
Chinese balloons to UFOs and UAVs and drones
and whatever else, hovering over bases. What when
it was either it was raw in one
moment, then it was, you know, it just
was all over the map. And all it
really is doing is creating justification for more
as I was talking about. More, more, more.
More government controls, surveillance.
But here they are trying to hype the
idea that right now,
stemming from that conversation as well as the
Sean Ryan podcast, that Al Qaeda and ISIS
are suddenly streaming through this country and ready
to pop off at any moment right before
the inauguration.
Interesting how Alex has been hyping some big
thing right before that this entire time despite
really not much evidence other than them saying
this and what they're highlighting here, which to
me seems like a massive coordinated agenda.
Same point, Whitney simply says, and the path
to doing what she's talking about is Palantir.
That is not I mean,
watch it play out.
And don't forget, Palantir is currently working with
Israel to commit genocide.
Literally partnered with them in January 2024
to use their Palantir technology to kill people
in Gaza.
They're using the Lavender program, habsura.
Like, I I forgot to grab it this
time, but I usually include that as well.
This is from 972 magazine. Lavender, the AI
machine directing Israel's bombing spree in Gaza.
And, of course, I'll I'll include the James
Corbett
breakdown of Peter Thiel,
The strange story of Peter Thiel.
Now interestingly enough,
it was relevant obviously for Trump saying the
CIA point now that Christy Noem is saying
the same thing despite that being a huge
I mean, if anybody was going to demonstrate
one thing that we all kind of generally
think of as the deep state overlap, it
would be the CIA.
And yet, they're openly saying, see, we need
to work with them to fight whatever they
think they're gonna fight. It's
transparent to me. But I wanted to find
it. Right? So I was, okay. Let's let's
just quickly grab that tweet. So if you
remember, it's very simple. You just simply look
up the you do an advanced
search, and you type in the word and
whatever. I'll, search for CIA. And what do
you know? Nothing pops up.
I've showed you guys this so many times.
Twitter is actively suppressing content that I don't
think but if you have the link, sometimes
you could find it, which I did, which
is right there. But you can see it,
it says CIA right there. Right? The point
is, this is supposed to search for anything
with the word CIA from Donald Trump. Not
not neither one. I'll just show you. I'll
just let's just pick,
Gaza.
Well, that's interesting. I guarantee same point. I
guarantee. Let's let's do something not serious. Let's
do, what?
America.
And there you go. The word America pops
up in a lot of tweets, but so
does Gaza and so does the CIA in
some. But weirdly enough, those don't show up.
I wonder why that is. You think that's
by accident, guys? This is Twitter directly and
in real time without I mean, it's demons
I'm demonstrating it. Suppressing content that they don't
want to translate, but you could probably find
them if you really looked.
So, again, in case you're missing it, there's
the CIA right there. And I'll read the
whole one. This is our our the whole
tweet. This is our country. This was January
second
of this year. Our country is a disaster,
a laughingstock, all over the world. This is
what happens when you have open borders with
weak, ineffective, and virtually non existent leadership. Well,
I mean, no, that by design in some
cases, that's part of it. But, no, that's
the larger point of this is what you've
all done. Effectively selling us out to a
foreign country for the interest of anybody but
Americans. But it says the DOJ, Jeff BI,
and Democrat state, it's all about one side,
and the local prosecutors have not done their
job.
They are incompetent and corrupt, leaving which is
true. Leave having spent all of their waking
hours unlawfully attacking their political opponent, me, rather
than focusing on protecting Americans from outside and
inside violent scum that has infiltrated all aspects
of our government. So right even right here,
he's floating the idea that there's an internal
problem, which, by the way, I think there
is. But I don't think it's what you
think it is. It says, end our nation
itself. Democrats should be ashamed of themselves for
allowing this to happen to our country. The
CIA must get involved now before it's too
late.
That's just crazy.
The USA is breaking down. A viral derosion
of safety, national security, and democracy is taking
place all across our nation.
No. I mean, this is the same as
hyping some looming dark cloud in antisemitism. I
mean, right now, we're in the the problems
we're seeing are because of this, because of
division tactics and outside forces.
His only strength and powerful leadership will stop
it. See you on January 20th. Make America
great. Yeah. Same old thing. Make America great
again with the CIA.
But here is what we're getting, and this
is what this is coming from. Alright? This
is a Jane Doe,
another Sean Ryan post. This is from the
Jan January 15th.
So it's just you know, I thought what's
funny is this guy got kind of ran
through the mud or rather whatever you would
call it. He got beat up because he
was exposed for blatantly mis like, this this
was a propaganda re re revelation or a
reveal.
With
the CIA interviewing the CIA essentially breaking down
fake emails that got exposed to be fake
in real time. And now and then he
goes, oh, I'm gonna go into hiding and
then come right back to it. It's same
old thing because the narrative doesn't go away.
They need you, in my opinion, to think
that they have secret Al Qaeda bed hotbeds
in this country for whatever they're gonna roll
out next, which seems to be rapidly coming.
So now we got another
anonymous Jane Doe. Seems real trustworthy.
Saying reveals the enemy's new innovations and plans
for attacks in the US and Europe, guess
what guys, involve biological weapons.
Here is your overlap. We've been telling you
this was coming, which they have already tested.
Jane further explains how Al Qaeda is leveraging
microbiologists
to develop weapons of mass destruction. Do I
really need to go back into what Al
Qaeda is to understand that Al Qaeda and
ISIS are literally proxy elements of Israel and
the United States? This is this is a
verifiable fact.
And here we are, where they're just going
so they're telling you Israel, with the United
States' help, is gonna be doing things with
chemical weapons or biological weapons inside the United
States. Get ready.
That's what this says. The reality though is
they're just hyping the idea of the upcoming
threat. The vanilla
ISIS, COVID 19, biological threat overlap, whatever. Remember,
we've talked about this so many times. The
idea of a potential aspect of
a foreign entity using a biological attack. Right?
That's what this is. But then the point
is where it becomes the intersection with a
group they can use inside this country. So
when you have planted elements, not coming in
from the outside, like, you know, in the
process of, but being implanted,
would argue that they were working with somebody.
Watches the never narrative builds out, guys. It's
probably gonna be democrats this time. I'm just
kind of guessing at that, but the historical
narrative is using the republicans.
Your government, as much as you love to
pretend like it's 2 sides, your government,
Republicans, were blaming you, planning to, for what
this with the vanilla ISIS dynamic, the Azov
movement influence,
calling you racist for wearing red hats and
anti semitism. I mean, it's so obvious the
way this strings together. The rise above movement
from Charlottesville
that they use to blame you all for
this was the Azov movement's US arm. It's
a fact.
And they are funded by Israel and United
States. It's pretty simple. CIA funding from 1948
forward for the fascist element in Ukraine.
Simple.
So here we are again.
I think because they're losing control.
I'm worried about where this goes.
And here's what they said.
We have scientists
there. What we know, they have microbiologists
who are working in biological
labs
developing
weapon of mass destruction.
Even the UN reported that they have weapons
engineers.
Weapon what? Weapon engineers. Weapon engineers. Yes. To
build new weapon. For example, we know that
they are working on drones. We're potential
What exactly what do you think her accent
sounds like?
Let me know in the chat. Facing
biological
warfare as well. It's on the platter. Yes.
What kind of biological weapons?
We exactly
don't know. Not yet. They are working on
modifying
agents
to make it more lethal. And there is
an Al Qaeda microbiologist.
He was detained. His name is Yazid Sofat.
He's a Malaysian. Actually, he's a former military.
He studied in the United States. He was
detained
until 2019.
Then his close monitoring
ended in 2021.
2022.
He was already working in Afghanistan
in a lab. Were they testing these? They
already tested in Afghanistan.
What was the outcome? It's working.
Right. Afghanistan, like the place that the US
government has been using
for a long time. Like the or the
first step from Brzezinski's plan for the balkanization
of the Middle East. Like, it's just obvious
what's going on. But my in my opinion
but so the accent, my it's my opinion.
There's There's no way I could know for
sure. To me, it feels like somebody pretending
to be to speak differently than they actually
do. And I get the sense that there's
something behind that that sounds like something relevant
to a larger conversation. But it's a complete
it's a complete opinion.
But I think it's interesting overall what this
all connects back to. And it's something that
Whitney's been writing about for the longest time,
something we've all been breaking down for quite
a while.
This has been an or I think what's
happened is we're seeing either the kind of
going back to older agendas
or that this is kind of the long
sought plan finally coming to fruition.
But this Whitney wrote this on 16th.
Dark winter again, near exact recycling of the
intended post 911 narrative for the anthrax attacks,
which were to be blamed on Al Qaeda
until the anthrax got traced back to US
military. That's Fort Detrick.
2001 anthrax attacks were actually done by spook
contractors at Battelle, SAIC,
and the vaccine company Emergent BioSolutions,
which produced the embattled anthrax vaccine that the
attacks conveniently rescued
and aspects of the US NatSec state.
That's the same clip. Now here
is the original
this is where, you know, Whitney wrote these
for the last American Vagabond in 2020.
That would be originally posted on the last
American Vagabond. So I recommend you check them
out.
All roads lead to dark winter.
The overlap of the dark winter experiments or
exercise, excuse me, and the anthrax discussion, and
killer enterprise, how one of big pharma's most
corrupt companies plans to corner the COVID 19
market, that's Emergent BioSolutions.
Head of the hydra, the rise of Robert
Kadlek during Trump's administration,
engineering contagion, UPMC,
coronathrax, and the darkest winter. Four part series
I recommend you check out. The bottom line,
guys, is this
is exactly what is it's it's it's a
tired narrative. I think the overlapping thing is
that this is where it interject
or intertwines with the new elements of where
this goes.
And I simply said with what's appears to
be some dark winter narrative used once again
through the Sean Ryan show, it's important that
you refamiliarize yourself with what is excellent in
in the engineering contagion series that she wrote
for T Lab in 2020.
And very important stuff because I genuinely think
this is
building into something alarming. Remember when Whitney and
I talked about this in the election special?
Or I forget her name now, but she
basically said something's building and we just don't
know how to stop it. It's the same
kind of evolving element. They need to build
the idea. And I think they've lost control
for a lot of reasons. Their Israel genocide
caused a lot of problems for them and
still is. But it feels like they're starting
to cobble this back together.
For obvious reasons, I think they're losing control.
Now while that's happening,
guess what? He's you can expect this kind
of
fake alternative media. The point the point is
that this is being hyped from Sean Ryan
from an anonymous sources even though we just
saw 2 kind of spectacular failures where he
was lying.
January 17th, Alex Jones, terrorism alert. Federal helicopters
are searching DC for signs of radioactive material
3 days before the inauguration of president Trump.
The FBI has issued a warning that terrorists
may be planning an attack. So it's interesting
how you just take it face value government
narratives at this point. Guy, I'm I'm I
was thinking about this today.
He's just he's literally mainstream media.
Like, it's crazy. He is he is he's
become the mainstream media, which I think is
interesting. But I said, here we go again.
This despite the last hype narrative, just like
the one just like this one, which was
during the drone conversation.
And what happened with that? Remember all this
big what happened? It just fell away.
And I made that point. Remember? I said,
look. Every day, there was a new narrative
from proven this. Northcom said this. Nope. Now
it's nuclear test material.
And guess what? None of those re it's
went forward, and we never even looked back.
That's that's what this deception looks like, in
my opinion.
But here's a new one. This one's from
17th, 346.
Breaking. Federal helicopter searching for radioactive material. A
lot of Trump say you know, same point,
same clip, but different new share.
The nuclear emergency support team, Twitter writes,
conducts searches like this at all major events,
such as Super Bowl and Republican and Democratic
National Conventions.
So what this looks like is using things
that are common but without full context to
manipulate people that don't know any better.
Or maybe he doesn't, and that should speak
just as many volumes.
But that's embarrassing.
35,000,000
views of people running around acting like there's
nuclear bombs planned at the inauguration. And and,
oh, maybe there is. But the point is
based on this routine conduct searches or conducted
search,
that's not an indication that there's anything different
going on. But this has been realized. This
same narrative was hyped before that was even
happening. Based on some random guy saying that's
likely what happened. Or before that about the
drones, which didn't turn out to be the
case. One after another.
Now we talked about all this. 5th generation
warfare is what it's called. Drones, fog, false
flags, and political destabilization.
It's rampant right now.
Now more of this continues as he talks
the same day.
Terror prediction.
This just gets ridiculous.
A prophecy.
You're reporting on prophecies now? Isn't that very
Zionist
media?
Don't miss the connection there, gentlemen. Ladies and
gentlemen, excuse me. Prophecy of more than a
1000 terrorists carrying out major attacks all over
the US.
Pastor Biggs claims he received a nightmarish vision
from God? See, this is my point about
intertwining religion with journalism.
It should never happen. I'm a Christian,
and the the last thing I would ever
do was bring to you something from my
religious perspective to make a point that do
did
necessitates
facts.
That's wild to me. That is that is
taking advantage
of Christian people.
That's what that is. Even if he believes
it. This is a one person's prophecy. So
a dream he had about something.
And guess what? It just so happens to
bolster exactly the narrative the government's building.
I guess that's just a coincidence. What do
you think?
Does this guy just post the same thing?
Current Alex Jones guest says the lord told
him thousands of migrants are planning 9:11 style
attacks.
You really think that guys I mean, you
really think this all just coincidentally comes together?
Whitney says, hating all the predictive programming about
this crap. If something happens, all the Sean
Ryan bots will activate and start yelling they
hate us for our freedoms over the most
obvious CIA proxy
ever and cheering on the complete Palantir takeover
of government.
Stop future terror attacks before they happen. That's
what they're talking about right now. That's in
fact exactly what's being said by the current
administration.
It's been there the longest time. She's been
covering it for years. But here's the actual
article he's pointing to. Right? So the so
the pastor he was referencing for the prophecy
was pointing to this article in his presentation.
And it says, 100 of migrants from ICE's
hotbed country
have crossed the US border. So the first
point to make is that that's a as
you read through it, the only point being
made is 100 of migrants came from a
country that they tell you is ICE's hotbed.
In no way, shape, or form is there
any indication that any of them at all
are ICE's connected at all in any case.
At all. Understand.
Could be. Maybe.
But that's not evidence. That's not journalism. That
is a propaganda hype story for a government
narrative. And here's what it says. The number
of migrants flocking to the US Mexico border
from a country known as known as a
hotbed of ISIS, which again is an Israeli
I Israeli US proxy army,
has skyrocketed under Biden. It says at least
500
from Tajikistan have been caught so far this
year. Okay. Were any of them ISIS members?
No. No. They weren't.
Okay. So the story becomes, out of everyone
that we caught, none of them were a
problem. But because they came from a country
that we claim as a hotbed, the story
just skip over the meat of the story
and just go
you get the point. Invasion, ISIS problem, but
there's none of that at all other than
that works for the narrative or maybe get
you more clicks and shares
that says the small central Asian country which
borders both China and Afghanistan has become a
major source of terrorism for ISIS and
can you guess which one?
ISIS k. I'm hoping you guys remember, we're
about to go through it briefly again. An
extreme offshoot of the Islamic State militant group
or a complete constructed pro proxy CIA Israeli
Mossad construct used to keep the air ISIS
narrative going, which is what I genuinely believe.
I'll show you. This is not some half
cock theory. This we went through this in-depth
in multiple articles to show us.
Now, of course, this could include ISIS, possible
attack.
This is what you're getting, you know, terror
propaganda report, emergency broadcast,
freaking people out. And you're bay basing it
on what?
Government narratives.
It says the threat of ISIS and its
offshoot is self evident.
Oh, is it? So that's another way of
saying we have no evidence, but we should
be concerned because it's just your we know
you should be. Great job, New York Post.
Good job. Great journalism.
Wow.
Well, in case you forgot,
we talked about this from the, what is
it? The I forgot the name of the
place. The Crocus City Hall, the Russia conversation.
This This one was from August 20th 2020
or October 20, excuse me, 2024. Israel kills
4 oximeter engineers. Different story, but worth considering.
Remember that con that was
probably one of the 45 times it happened
that day. And it says, ISIS k election
threats surface at opportune moment.
This you have to understand, this is such
a clear use.
Anytime they need this threat, this random ISIS
k which is it stands for,
oh, wait. I think I just closed it.
It's basically Afghanistan is what it's referencing. It's
the group from Afghanistan which need you to
remember who was controlling this location this entire
time, which is exactly where one of the
main culprits that was involved with attack comes
from, from the base at the US government.
But the point is,
it is ISIS
it says it's the, terrorist for ISIS and
the Islamic State, Courson province.
But it it refers to Afghanistan for the
most part.
So we talked about it in this article.
I'm just gonna include this for you to
go through or rather to the show for
you to check out for yourself. All the
source links included.
This one, all evidence points to US, Israel,
Ukraine behind the Croker City Hall shooting. And
the question we asked in this article, which
I think we pretty clearly showed is, does
ISIS k even exist?
So Wyatt Reed made an excellent point, and
this was at the time of that exact
conversation. Says for anyone wondering how the US
government could be so sure ISIS k in
quotes carried out the massacre in Moscow. This
should help. This is incredible. The leader of
ISIS k was a contractor at Bagram,
air that's a US bay location, and then
worked security
for drug lord, Rashaan Dostum, a top CIA
proxy.
He later worked for Amrullah Slay, a chief
of the NDS,
literally the CIA's right hand man in Afghanistan.
It's right there on the Wikipedia page. Now
we went over all of this in on
the page in that show. Watch it for
yourself.
It's it's absurd
how they think we're just this lazy. The
reality is this guy is overlapping in 14
different ways with the CIA and the US
government.
I think this is an ab this is
the extension of what has always been a
US Israeli proxy, but the idea that ISIS
k is not even, like, an a genuine
like, the point is most of these groups
are led by manipulators, but really do use
religious extremists.
In this case, I'm wondering whether this is
just an absolute construct of the US government
to to its entirety. But who knows? My
point is, and I think it's pretty obvious
this group is not what they're claiming it
is.
So remember, this is the group that they're
talking about that overlaps with what they claim
is building up inside the United States. That's
the New York Post article saying that all
of these people came from Turkestan,
And then that guy on Alex Jones' show
is pointing at that and saying, they're all
gonna be carrying out a tax on inauguration
with that's what's happening.
So if it does and we're pointing at
this group, let's realize what's actually happening.
This at the time was the best shot
we got of 1 of the guys that
was arrested at the Crooked City Hall. Pretty
sure he doesn't look like a ISIS k
member.
But that's a blurry picture, so you could
take it for what you will.
Also, we had the RT India point out,
and this this was backed up by a
lot of other outlets and a lot of
people that just were able to discern this
who spoke the language, saying rumors that ISIS
claim
responsibility for the terrorist attack are unfounded.
They they they share the image. That's how
they which is funny. People like the, the
rebel news took it at face value and
were like, but they said, so we know
it wasn't
Ukraine. So now you're now you're blindly believing
what ISIS tells you. Whatever sees Zionists will
go with whatever works for their narrative. But
it says the widely shared image of what
alleges to be the statement by the group,
taking responsibility for the incident, uses the news
template that ISIS apparently abandoned years ago. And
as sense used and so it's maybe they
would bath to it. Of course, that's possible.
Obviously, it lines up with what they're using
to continue to maybe they're just not up
to date.
Who knows? The point is, guys, the overarching
point
as Whitney wrote for Women Press News in
2017,
Israeli website claims ISIS commander revealed as a
Mossad agent.
They are not what they appear to be.
This is her and Ron official, but Israel's
facade created by ISIS.
Here's an ISIS fighter, or rather the new
this is Newsweek reporting that ISIS fighters regret
attacking Israel
and have publicly, quote, apologized
according to the defense minister,
ISIS.
So we're gonna believe that ISIS,
who's supposed to be
the mortal enemy of Israel and Jews and
Americans,
said, I'm sorry. We didn't mean to bomb
you. Or the fact that we show every
30 seconds that the every time Israel has
an you know, something going on with Iran,
suddenly ISIS attack Iran. Then they later tell
you that they're the leading state sponsor of
terrorism funding ISIS. And that totally lines up.
Right? Or at the same time, Hamas or
whatever they need to lie about that day
as they fund an arm and move them
around.
Israeli intel chief. We don't want ISIS defeated
in Syria. Or the fact that they literally
transferred them. A new batch of ex ISIS
members transferred from Syria to Ukraine. And, guys,
we've shown you these videos. Here's one of
them right here where these Ukraine members have
ISIS patches. Or in Syria, where they're literally
sporting ISIS patches. How much can we possibly
ignore?
Every group that the US is supporting in
all these proxy wars are literal ISIS Al
Qaeda proxy overlaps.
And all food as usual, the secret history
of Al Qaeda from James Corbett that breaks
this down in undeniable
the receipts are there. I don't know how
anybody could ignore this.
And on the note of the border conversation.
Right? So as they're hyping this on that
info wars about the border conversate, people crossing
the border, well,
weird how when we got a real world
example. I've showed you this many times.
Remember when this first started, this guy crossed
the border, this guy here.
And he was claiming to be Palestinian, saying
you will know my name. I guarantee that
was a building point to where this narrative
is going.
And then people like myself and others did
a little due diligence.
Turned out, suspected terrorist at the Texas border
works for Mossad.
Turns out he was actually a mas recruiting
for Mossad. I believe it was in Jordan.
Or was it I've looked back in the
details. It's been a while. But the bottom
line was this was transparent. Be and now
we know that even more clearly. Because the
moment that got exposed, all the people on
the right that were screaming about the problem
with Hamas and the border went dead silent.
Nobody brought it up again.
Yeah. Because you're not supposed to call it
Mossad crossing the border, are you? Or the
fact that Mossad is engineering a weaponized migration
dynamic to do the very things that are
destroying this country. But you guys keep blaming
all the brown people because clearly that's the
problem.
Philip Giraldi points this out. Now this overlaps
with the end conversation, but I just wanna
point it out now for the what seemed
to be building false flag narratives. He says,
Trump will shy away from exposing the Israeli
false flag
having made this point that he is a
peacemaker
in charge
and in charge.
Point being that he's in line with Israel.
Right? And he doesn't wanna call them out
for that because that destroys this narrative they're
building that makes them look good. It says
the unsanctioning and congressional embrace of the Israeli
settlers
who are raping and murdering and burning people
alive, that's public knowledge,
will also help Netanyahu politically.
And they're gonna let them annex the West
Bank. I this is what's happening in my
opinion. Interestingly, Israeli media and its public have
reached negatively reacted negatively to the news that
the ceasefire is imminent,
claiming that it's a defeat,
which is interesting. That's embarrassing for them. It
says, in reality, Israel could as ever be
the winner in what is taking place with
no real pushback from Washington. We'll address this
in a second. But it's a fair point
to make that maybe the reporting of it
being a defeat is in order to make
them to make people like us feel like
that they're
when, ultimately, at the end of the day,
it looks like they would win based on
the outcome, but present themselves as being defeated
so people don't
push harder. It's interesting to think about.
Either way, I agree that I don't think
Trump will call it out.
Now,
all of this clearly leads
to the rationalization
for everything that we've been screaming about, including
Republicans, except when it overlaps with Trump, which
is the biometric scans, the digital ID, and
the all of the the great reset control
structure.
So here's what he said in regard to
the same thing. This person simply saying, Kristi
Noem has already said we're not getting a
wall. She'll use technology on parts in the
border. That'll be great. So we can watch
illegals crossing into our country. Of Course, she's
thinking about cameras when she shows you how
far our minds are away from the current
technological reality. That's not by accident.
But she goes, hope Trump supporters will soon
catch on to how the virtual border wall
being built by companies backed by Peter Thiel
on Bilderberg steering committee is meant to serve
as a Trojan horse for digital ID by
requiring
not just foreigners entering the US, but any
American traveling abroad to submit a digital biometric
entry exit system.
And if you don't believe that he's very
public about this.
Number 8.
We will finally complete
the biometric
entry exit visa tracking system, which we need
desperately.
For years, Congress has required
biometric
entry exit visa tracking systems,
but it has never been completed. The politicians
are all talk, no action, never happens,
never happens.
Hillary Clinton,
all talk. Unfortunately,
when there is action, it's always the wrong
decision. Do you ever notice?
In my administration,
we will ensure that this system is in
place.
And I will tell you, it will be
on land.
It will be on sea. It will be
in air. We will have a proper tracking
system.
So it's not hard to understand.
It will be by air, by land, by
sea. According to Trump, as you just heard.
So that's not just immigrants, guys.
Welcome to your Freedom MAGA biometric tracking system.
I mean, this is I mean, they call
it the freedom phone,
which it's not. Michael called the freedom system.
That makes you feel better. It's about controlling
you in and out of the country under
the guise of stopping immigration. How long have
we been talking about this?
Now, this is interesting, by the way.
Now we we talked about this overlapping border
conversation for a while. And there's no nobody
should be dismissing the very real risks
of, you know, what coyotes and human trafficking.
It's obvious, guys. But the problem
is that many of the people that are
most
avid or most interested in calling that out
will stop short when it becomes obvious that
it's not a partisan thing.
I mean, it's it's something we've been covering
on this platform for a very long time.
And as as my experience, it's never been
partisan. That's just how they love to frame
it. And typically, when they really like to
distract people, they they scream about democrat pedophiles.
Now, yes, there's plenty of examples of very
concerning issues. Same with on the right, though.
You realize the Epstein list did not go
one way, guys.
Except they just love to ignore it on
certain sides, both sides in that matter. But
so what I'm pointing this out for is
the overlap with the justification
for everything. I mean, Whitney was the first
one a long time ago to talk about
this with DNA. Same same with Derrick Bros.
That they're gonna talk about DNA,
ice iris scans, biometrics from the border, and
they've already been doing it. As he says
right here, the incoming borders are Tom Homan
says, under the Trump administration, we did DNA
testing. Now, of course, he uses that to
he bolster the point that we then did
that. We went from there
to find that they weren't the families.
And that they saved they claim 340,000
children, which if that's the case, that's great.
My point is, obviously, I don't know why
we would just take that at face value.
I'm not saying I'm dismissing it either. The
point is not even about that. It's about
the fact that even if that's good, or
even if it happened, which is good,
it's still justifying a thing that I think
is problematic.
Right? Just because it has a good outcome.
Like, for example, the Neuralink and, Hey, I
can walk again. Okay, that's great. But is
it also gonna be used to enslave humanity?
Right? Let's make sure we're being objective about
it. So I think there's a problem with
where this goes, and we don't still understand
what that fully means with where this direction
goes.
My point, though, in large is I don't
even know if we could take that at
face value.
It's all about using things you care about.
It's why they talk about human trafficking and,
you know, and or children, protecting children when
they talk about the online safety bill. Right?
Well, everyone object honest and I can tell
that's not about safe keeping children safe. It's
about using what you care about to justify
censorship of you in other context.
I'll include the articles Derek wrote on some
of these things. We're we're this is rapidly
rolling out under administration. Now this is under
Biden's, but it's only gonna get worse. He
says federal government watchdog warned the DHS surveils
Americans right now
without a warrant using more than 20 different
technologies.
This is December 20th.
That, drones included, by the way. Now remember
the drone conversation that Alex Jones was screaming
about the entire time was used to try
to roll out legislation, which I believe went
through that's about just you like, Rand Paul
called this out. Remember saying, look. They can
use this with a drone
to scan your phone and scan all your
facial your biometrics.
Why is that even on there if it's
about stopping drones from what we're arguing are
aliens or Iran? Because it was never about
either of those things.
I think I'm hoping we're beginning to see
that.
And he talks about the spyware,
50
I think it's 45,
46 percent of the entire market. Let me
there it is. 44.
Oh, no. It's not.
Oh, well. It's in there somewhere. It's somewhere
between 40 and 50. My point was it's
I think it's like 44 or 45%.
So almost 50% of the entire market of
spyware in the world is Israeli companies are
Israeli companies.
That's I mean, it's wild that's even the
case. These are things that are spyware. So
it's not something that's public. They are malware
or rather, surreptitious
things that are implanted on your computer that
you don't know about, or your phone. And
they make a point in this discussion with
Pegasus and the NSO Group that Whitney's covered.
That they they these are, what do they
call them?
I whatever. No action. I forget something like
that. Where the point is you don't even
have to do anything. You don't have to
click a link.
It's just there. If they want to, they
can access it on your phone and just
have access to everything on your phone. That's
where they are. It's been there for a
long time. And your government's actively working with
this. Meet the spyware companies preparing to unleash
their tech during Trump's second term.
Or the Elon Musk star SpaceX overlapped with
the National Reconnaissance Office of the you can't
hide largest satellite spy network.
Actually, what they said. We are building this
around the world.
Now you can't hide because you're constantly being
looked at.
But freedom, though. Right? Freedom and liberty. Keep
yelling it. Maybe it'll get better.
And meanwhile, guys,
if you didn't see this,
I mean, I don't even know. I this
this is something that was out out there.
This is I'm I'm gonna play this just
because it's actually worth watching to see
I mean, here's my opinion about this. If
you haven't seen this video from Tom McDonald,
who don't forget, I think it points out
right down here, he just did a video
with Ben Shapiro called facts.
So let's not pretend like this guy this
guy anyway, the point is, this is a
video with Roseanne who also did braids that
just seems to me to be almost like
they're making fun. Like, all of the way
I see all of this. It's like, you
know how we used to watch corporate media
or something like that and what's the better
example? Like, or it's like in the Babylon
Bee, makes a joke about something that later
becomes, like, the reality. Like, I feel like
it's where we are right now. Or this
I feel like if you went back long
enough, this would have been like a parody
you would have seen on Saturday Night Live.
Right?
This is a video of them. The the
the song is called Daddy's Home.
Literally referring to Donald Trump.
Now some people are like, we're just trolling
the left. Like, I think you're just a
bit desperate because really, how are you trolling
anybody with this video? By looking stupid? You
think you're trolling somebody?
I mean, really, guys. It's just really wild
to me. Like, something this is like idiocracy.
I'll I'll read what I wrote. Why does
this not embarrass those it's aimed at?
Daddy's home?
Really?
I still argue this is conservatives
being trolled,
borderline being made fun of by TeamSport Republicans,
and then read that as just another part
of the US government.
Watch this video, guys. And you tell me
what you think. I mean,
I just I I feel it makes me
feel bad. Like, if I because there are
people out there that love this. They're like,
this is the best thing I've ever seen.
It's all in the comments, and they're not
trolling. They're not pretending. This is being posted
on their it's like on their, it's pinned
to the top of their feet. Like, this
is people are loving this, and it feels
like the dumb down America. This feels like
the,
the
manipulation of the uninformed article I just read.
And it's not just one side of the
paradigm, mind you. But this is where it
gets and feels
like we are being rapidly dumbed down. At
the very least, like this is what people
are driving towards. Like, for example, before I
play it, when we talked about, Brian,
High Impact Flix who went to the rally.
Remember what I was talking about?
And in my opinion, most of the people
I spoke to were good people. Genuine people
who wanted the best for this country, but
just had no idea.
And and and they're being fed this this
what this is.
You know, that we're all having fun and
we're together and we're winning. And it's just
like this it's it feels like hopium or
rather like some kind of opium of the
masses.
I'll even say this too. Just the start
of it right there. Like, with his arms
crossed, nod his head. Like, isn't that just
the stupidest cliche, like, fake rap thing you've
ever seen?
Why is this ridiculous?
Again, I won't I'll I'll let it go.
Thank God that we're back couldn't take another
4 years. That's a wrap. I can take
a bath in your tears. That's a fad.
You got lipstick all on your beard. You're
a man. That is cap. That is cap.
Cap. Cap. Cap. Cap. Cap. Cap. Cap. You
pretending you're accepting. That's a egg. You hear
pat. Pat. Pat. Pat. Pat. Pat. Pat. If
you want our freedom, come and take it
back but you can't.
We want it. Do mad. It's done. Too
bad. Boo hoo, so sad. Now you're dead.
It's funny. You know what? I really don't
feel like watching this whole thing. But I
should be honest.
It's just
you know, you lost, boohoo, take our freedom
back. Like, I mean, I just don't believe
most Americans are this stupid. It is like
the lowest common denominator.
What? Like, so you took your freedom back
by voting for another controlled president? I just
don't believe people think like this, guys. I
mean, I know a lot of people want
to think like that.
But I just I mean, if you believe
that you somehow won your freedom back, whatever
that means, because you participated in a controlled
process or let's just even say that's not
the case. Let's say you think Trump is
gonna change the world like he did last
time
for 4 years.
So you took your freedom back and then
what? They can you could lose it again
in 4 years. Like, how is this a
process that we pretend?
Anyway, I'm just I I want people to
think about how you're being
aimed at, like, with this like, the way
I think Elon Musk is, like, playing what
he wants to think you think.
And it's always, like, this generalized
idea of what, like, the lowest condominator
is. But yet, it kinda just gets, like,
you know, it's you know, jumping up, you
know, this bay I'll I'll show I'll play
something in a second. Like, just the way
he's acting on the stage, for example. But
here's what, oh, and now the thing too
again is the the thing with, Shapiro called
facts,
which was cringey. It was so silly. Same
with this one. And it was a guy
with a guy that's constantly lying about Israel,
so it's pretty silly. But I I also
think that Tom McDonald was like just he's
just
leaning into anything Trump at all costs because
it works. That's what people on social media
are doing the same.
In another example, and I got a few
of these, it's just things like this. And
this is just about kind of like look
over there stuff. Right? Like, so instead of
looking at all this, it's like, we won.
Don't worry. It's the same thing that happened
with Trump the first time.
Many people that were, I think, even libertarian
were like, we did it. It's over. We
won.
Like, even if you thought that, then 4
years later, what? It just it's over? Like,
we're not it's weird.
But that happened. Right? We saw a lot
of that. And the same thing here. They
want you to be like, we did it.
Hooray. Let's just kind of and all high
five and and pretend, like, you know, but
not acknowledge what's actually happening. In this case,
it's the same point I made about the
kind of pedophilia thing. Right? Here's doctor Simon
Goodeck
highlighting an article from 2014 that I swear
has been
the world around, like, 400,000
times, especially in these circles. It's the New
York Times article, which we've we've shown you
many times. It's literally entitled pedophilia, a disorder,
not a crime. It's horrifying.
And Elon Musk goes, what what the f?
WTF.
I'm just going, really? Okay. So here you
are making this huge screening case about what's
going on in the UK.
And then you don't know about this?
I mean, I just I certainly possible, I
guess. But I just simply said, as if
you didn't already know about this. It's just
all about, like, oh my god. Look at
that. Pedophile. New York Times. Look at the
just anything to get you looking away from
your the cage being built around you right
now, by some of which are in the
same class, by the way. But I simply
quoted this and I said, many have been
calling this out
for well over a decade and some even
longer. Sure feels like a lot of this
look over there posting of old news is
being used to distract from what the Elons
of the world are rolling out. Elon even
commented below with shock.
And this is the article I wrote about
this a while back on the blatant New
York Times attempt to normalize pedophilia. And it's
and one of the articles was called was
entitled why I admire Anthony Weiner after he
got caught for all of his weird stuff.
And then I talked about that article right
there.
But many things like that. Or here's a
good example. All in the same time frame.
Now this, by the way, in no way
am I defending these horrifying people. Right? The
what this is about is the the bill
about,
sexual predators.
It's no excuse. I mean, they're disgusting, but
the same thing happens all the time from
both sides of the paradigm. We've talked about
this a 1,000 different ways over, whether in
past examples of exactly things like this that
the Republicans sided against or things like stop
arming terrorist acts that they all voted down.
I think it's constant this happens. No way
am I saying that Raskin rasp
Raskin or the rest are somehow
misrepresented.
It's not the point. My point, though, is
that this is one of the many different
examples of how this political dynamic always works
and why them passing this bill is in
the, ultimately, these people are all in the
same crowd. They all most of them are
all overlapped with the same things and all
compromised by the same Zionist disgusting organization. We
all see this if we're being objective or
the Epstein overlaps.
But lives on TikTok just as white Democrats
little pedophiles.
You know? I mean, first of all, what
they're talking about is sexual abuse. Not just
only children, but that's what is that's what
gets the attention.
See my point?
Here's another example.
That's a this is the one I was
gonna say a second ago. I thought it
was funny. So, you know, the great highlights
Bernie Sanders. And what this always this is
how the 2 party paradigm works in its
purest form
or whatever, worst form.
Bernie Sanders asks this guy, which Bernie Sanders
does not deserve your trust. This guy is
a waffling, wavering guy that, you know, when
when it loves to come out and say,
hi. This is bad, and these are bankers,
and Israel but then the moment when it
matters, like, the the Clinton dynamic or Israel
genocide,
he's not. It's typical. But it says, are
Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg too
wealthy and powerful, he says. Do you agree
with president Biden about an oligarchy? Because, of
course, Biden comes out and floats the idea,
which is just the same old thing. Because
one, he wants to point that out so
it is it ends up being you're doing
it to say, like, basically, simple reverse psychology.
So Biden says that, therefore, democrat Republicans
believe,
team smart Republicans,
that's not true because Biden said it. Therefore,
Biden's the one.
Or they're all an oligarchy, guys, because that's
not just a half government thing. It's a
government thing. Well, let's keep being childish about
it. But the point is that he asked
that because Biden brings it up. It's been
an oligarchy for a very long time. Scott
Basent says those 3 billionaires all made their
money themselves. No, they did not.
I mean, do I have to play the
clips about Elon Musk again? Scott,
Greg Reese nailed it. He didn't. That's a
lie. But the point is, that's the narrative,
so we'll go with the narrative because Musk
is a central role in whatever's coming. He
says, Musk came to the country as an
immigrant. But he goes Sanders goes, forget about
how they made their money. Do you believe
it's an oligarchy?
It's a fair question. Right? But, of course,
Sanders playing the same role, making it about
one side versus the other. The Senate then
does the thing they always do. Well, I
would note that president Biden gave the presidential
medal of freedom to people that I think
would qualify.
So the point is, Biden did those things
too.
But you don't you don't get the point
that means they're all an oligarchy? Well, they're
all just kinda deflecting to the other side?
That's how the 2 party paradigm works. It
allows you to only look at one side.
The problem never changes.
Meanwhile,
we live in an oligarchy.
Interesting how that works.
I have this is the one that we,
oh, wait.
See if that comes up. Oh no, I
know what it is.
Or not.
I was gonna grab that video.
That's crazy. I could've swore I still had
that. Well, I'm gonna look for it a
second. You know, the the video that talks
about, you know, is the US an oligarchy?
It's a it's a very important video. That
is I know I've got it in here,
but I just I'll find in a second.
The reality is that we do. There's a
Princeton study, and it's not just because of
the study, guys. It's it's obvious. And if
not, much worse.
The av the the verifiable information shows, quite
frankly,
period. Easy to see, that if lobbyists want
to, and APAC being the most powerful,
doesn't matter if every single American wants it.
They can make sure it doesn't happen. That
alone shows you we do not live in
what we think we do. And then, of
course, the same thing is every single American
could not want something, and they can make
sure it happens.
Very easily shown.
So this game we play where we're not
is is a lie.
Bennie Johnson
comes out with a statement that I think
is important to think about. Because right now,
with all that we're
showing, from Bill Gates, the World Economic Forum,
to the Zionist PAC administration, I mean, just
everything about this are obviously concerning.
Now you could obviously stand back and say,
no. Well, you know, same old Q Gayle
insiders to fight the inside. I hope maybe
you're right.
But the point is not that these things
don't matter.
At the very least, you would say, yeah.
I get why you're concerned, but Trump knows
what he's doing. But look at this response.
Like, my point is to simply highlight that
there are obvious reasons that people, especially conservatives,
are uncomfortable. And it's not just because the
I guess, whatever he frames it as, like
the democrats or just somebody who doesn't like
republicans or somebody fighting team humanity. Just because
it's not just me going this thing and
that thing. That's not what's happening. Trump's doing
those things, and conservatives are seeing them. And
I'm highlighting those as well, but it's not
it's conservatives by and large calling these things
out.
But here's his response to this stuff. Public
service announcement he says, since our victory in
November, there's been a raging effort from bad
faith actors to tear the American First Movement
apart.
Now that's certainly possible he's even talking about
something completely different. Because there are. Right? There
are always bad faith actors trying to manipulate
things they don't like or disagree with, partisan
wise and other. Right? But I get the
sense he's talking about people like us that
are highlighting
justifiable concerns about where this goes. And I
said he said the attacks have been relentless.
Some in public, lost behind the scenes, dark
spiritual energy.
You know? Oh, yeah. I mean, I I
think it's pretty interesting how you can highlight
all of this momentum behind the current administration
as dark spiritual energy directly tapped into the
Zionist genocide. But, you know, that's just me.
But he goes, the enemy would love nothing
more than for Trump to enter office with
a his base atomized.
They want us fractured and bitter. Well, guess
what? That's happening whether or not people point
out these problems because they see it. He
goes ripping at each other over nonsense. You
see? That's my point. Nonsense?
So you don't care that he's breaking promises
or that he's working with people that are
supposed to be the enemy? Or that he
is a Zionist supporting a genocide? I mean,
these things don't matter. That's not nonsense. You
could argue that we misunderstand or that Trump
knows something we don't. But nonsense?
See, this is my point. Honest people are
gonna go, hold on a minute. That's not
because Ryan said that. I don't like him
admitting gopi gay Bill Gates. I don't like
him supporting the shot. I don't like him
speaking at the World Economic Forum. Those things
are are real.
Hardly nonsense.
And he goes, a house divided against itself.
Be exceedingly cautious of those sowing division right
now. Now, there's a question about that. Right?
It who are is are let's say let's
say exactly what I'm doing. Am I sowing
division?
Or am I trying to point out a
problem and seeking actual unity? Not the fake
dynamic they're putting forward, but the idea of
let's collect let's let's work together for a
collective good that's not partisan, that's based on
objective truth and a meritocracy. No. That's not
what they're doing. You understand? They're pushing division
under a guise of unity. But my point
is,
just by pointing out that that's a problem,
is that sowing division? It may be to
them.
But it goes instead, check out what Trump
is doing.
A total gentleman facing Obama, meeting tech leaders
who deplatform. Oh, I see. So now you're
framing the things that they're all concerned about
as the reason we should be happy.
That's a special next level type of propaganda.
And he goes, a total gentleman facing Obama.
You mean the same Obama that most conservatives
are are concerned about? And the fact that
he met with him is the thing they're
worried about, not because I said so. Or
tech leaders like Zuckerberg and Bezos and all
the rest.
It goes, winning over democrat senators who voted
to impeach him.
Or, now stay with me here,
they were always on the same side. Boom.
Mind blown. Right? Like, the idea that you
just chose to ignore these things, that's not
what any of the party is even saying.
The vast majority of the people that are
fighting this stuff are don't want that. They
only go I mean, you know the more
exactly what I'm saying. That's a very, very
deceptive way to frame that. Building bridges.
You mean, but these are the same exact
people that are in every other context calling
out anybody that goes against their agendas. So
building bridges?
Like, there is. The people we're talking about,
Obama,
Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, Bezos, these people are monsters
that are still hurting people. But because they
wanna be on your side, it's all good
now?
How do you make sense of that? That's
the same as the US government going, hey,
Sudan. You can be on our side as
long as you work with Israel. We don't
care if you're terrorists. Or likewise, you never
were.
Yep. Same thing, guys. Either they're bad guys
or not. They don't just become on our
side because they're powerful. But that's what's happening.
Blessed are the peacemakers. Right? Broad stroke. As
long as we say it's good, then it
will be good. Shut up and sit down.
He says, I've had to hold my fire
over the my, hold my fire over the
past few months. Take a deep breath. Pick
up the phone. Make peace. Love the enemy.
Really?
But see, that's not how it works, guys.
You don't just decide to ignore the enemy
and be friends.
Only if they're willing to not be the
enemy anymore. Only if they're willing to not,
I don't know, dump mRNA dangerous shots in
front of children. Or continue supporting a genocide.
Like, you don't just go, oh, let's be
friends now, so we'll ignore all the things
you're doing. Friends. Unity.
That's not how that works. If a guy
is a mass serial murderer who just decides
to wanna be your friend, you don't just
ignore the murder. You go, well, hold on.
You're still a mass murderer. So that's not
gonna work for me. Apparently, Bennie Johnson thinks
otherwise. And it says unity is what matters.
No. That's a that's one aspect of a
larger conversation.
Unity is how we got here in 2024.
Is it?
I just I think this is an effort
to get you to miss the point. As
the Freethinkers Project says, it was never an
America First Movement, bud. It's been exposed finally
for what it always was, a bunch of
empty talk. More of the same schlock that's
been served by the UN party for years
years. Your post shows you want us to
eat it up.
Not happening. 12¢.
Now as we've talked about,
this is very I I this is exactly
what I think is happening. The new Trump
administration and the technocratic Zionist coup of the
United States, or possibly already has, but this
is just coming
to full view as Matt Ayers talked about.
But as Phil Turaldi also pointed out as
we get into the conversation of Israel, Netanyahu
himself has made no secret of his desire
to have Donald Trump win the presidency next
month. This was posted on October 4th, 2024.
As he correctly perceives
that Trump would give him anything he wants,
whatever whenever he wants it. Just as he
did in 2016 to 2020.
I agree.
And more evidence to that point is, here's
what Trump said,
October 19, 2024.
Trump says Biden tries to hold back Netanyahu.
Oh, really?
A guy has committed one of the most
obvious genocides in living in history, in fact.
One of the most documented in history.
And you think he's holding him back?
Well, that clearly shows you where this next
administration is going, doesn't it? But people will
ignore it. Act like he means something else
when it's pretty damn clear what he's been
doing and what he means and what his
thoughts are. He's expressed them, is my point.
But
same overlapping point to the the partisan side,
but then into the Israel conversation.
My point on this is that here's senator
Cruz showing you these people are going to
do exactly what I just showed you from
Trump. They're going to give a blank check
to Israel because that's what they do. Not
one side or the other,
but your government.
Senator Ted Cruz says, the Trump administration, with
Marco Rubio as secretary of state, are going
to reverse the Biden administration's policies
undermining Israel.
I mean, or this is crazy to me
that we're literally calling this. I think I
might have said that here.
Yeah. I'll just read this in a second.
So he he goes on to say, they're
going to end sanctions on Israel. Israel Jews
living in Judea and Samaria.
Oh, you mean the West Bank and Gaza.
Right. So here's a guy I mean, this
is like them speaking about the ISIS caliphate
in a glowing term. Right? You're literally even
using the terms of a Zionist occupying colonial
territory that's committing a genocide.
And he goes and impose the mandatory sanctions
passed by congress against Palestinians for terrorism. Palestinians,
not Hamas. And he goes and and the
secret boycotts Biden officials have been imposing against
Israel. So he's making the case that Biden
has been hindering Israel this whole time
while committing a genocide.
And that Trump is gonna make it less
hindered.
I mean, how would you read that other
than it's gonna be worse than it is
now?
And he goes, I look forward to Marco's
confirmation.
Unreal.
I simply said, the Trump team once again,
quote, fighting the deep state and globalism
by supporting one of the most obvious examples
of both, the Zionist Israeli government. And even
claiming Biden, genocide Joe, by the way, who
is actually blindly supporting Israel was undermining Israel.
Anyone confused?
He shouldn't be. The point is they work
together.
And this is what's funny, by the way.
This is what you get from people that
want to believe Trump's gonna hold Israel for
last because QAnon said.
Well, they go, everything communicated is inverted.
Need to see what actually happens. Now I
can agree with the second part. We always
should need to see what happens. That doesn't
change the fact that you're acknowledging what he's
telling you, which challenges like, the point is,
if this was him saying they what they
like, they'd go, no, we knew it. See?
What's gonna be great? But then when he
says the bad thing, they go, woah, woah,
woah. Hold on. We don't know yet. Let's
wait and find out. Well, let's let's apply
that equally. Okay? When they say something, it's
worth acknowledging, but we should wait to see
the action. That's the way it works. In
this case, everything communicated is inverted.
That's the game of pretending you're trolling if
you wanna get out of something. They're playing
the game where they're always playing, oh, we're
saying this to trick them over there. This
is the 4 d chess. So it makes
everything mean nothing and nothing mean everything all
the time.
That's propaganda.
Now the reality
is that the ADL and Israel and APAC
and all these other elements are aggressively controlling
the outcome of what happens in this country.
And that's why you get people like that
in the midst of the most public genocide
in history, openly saying we're gonna take the
reins off. Make let them do whatever they
that's what he's telling you.
But guess what? The ADL is also telling
you that on top of everything else, they're
partnered and training the FBI.
Now you're this comes back full circle to
the point from before. You know what group
has faked
more events than any other well, I well,
it's hard to say. The CIA probably has
more than we even know about. But publicly
caught for faking
events. False flags, for example.
The FBI.
Now, maybe it's worth considering that the ADL
is now telling you, well, we've worked with
you. We trained almost every FBI agent. Okay.
Well, that's fascinating.
Now we also talked about this one. Right?
This was recent January 30 13th. The CEO
of
the ADL, John Greenblatt, who we just played
earlier on record telling you about the TikTok
dynamic, which they've got censored,
are about to,
In the Knesset in Israel, literally saying,
the pager attack in Lebanon that killed, like,
I think it was, like, 70 mostly children
and women.
Says the kind of genius behind that attack
is what they need now to fight anti
semitism. And he's talking about a conversation in
the United States.
Unreal.
And Whitney says, absolutely bonkers statement, especially when
you consider that the ADL has functioned as
a de facto
espionage
appendage
of a foreign state. And that many of
its long term funders are adjacent to organized
crime.
Here's the clip from City Center News. Meanwhile,
on top of all of that, the ADL
has a long standing partnership with the FBI
training every new agent.
Almost weekly basis,
our team at the ADL Center on Extremism
is in touch with the Federal Bureau of
Investigation,
sharing information
and helping the brave,
patriotic
men and women of the FBI
disrupt violence before it happens. Ladies and gentlemen,
it is my honor to introduce to you
today
our friend, our ally,
and our partner, the director of the FBI,
Christopher Wray. Wow.
Thank the ADL today for your support. Now
here's where they go, Democrat,
one side. We're gonna you know, but that's
not what's going on. And if you can't
recognize that clearly the ADL works both sides
of the paradigm because it's all the same
thing, then you haven't been paying attention. In
conducting
the training that all of our new special
agents and intelligence analysts participate in. We've been
such great partners in fighting to stamp out
I mean, he just said, oh, guys. Listen
again. I Just right. And the ADL
wanna thank the ADL today for your support
in conducting
the training that all of our new special
agents and intelligence analysts participate in.
All. I mean, guys, what more? I just
every day, it gets more. I mean, I
knew most of this already. Just it's incredible
how crazy that is.
If any other country, even a fraction
of this overwhelming influence, not let alone while
committing a public genocide
I mean, I don't know if we know
how we pretend this is not the most
obvious compromised occupied element in the world. It
is transparent.
And US is now carrying out world global
government agendas and regime changes at its to
its detriment
for a foreign government,
it which is explicitly for their agenda.
We've been such great partners in fighting to
stamp out the recent uptick in hate crimes
in the US. Your work
reminds
our young people what's at stake, why we
all,
must aggressively counter anti Semitic violence everywhere
it appears. ADL works
more closely with law enforcement than any other
private organization. And the law enforcement agency with
which we have worked the longest,
And the law enforcement agency
with which we have worked the longest and
the most extensively is the FBI.
Since 2000,
the FBI has required every new agent to
participate
in law enforcement and society,
LEAS.
That's a training program on core values created
by ADL and the US Holocaust Memorial Museum.
Mister Comey reaffirmed the bureau's commitment to this
unique program,
which will train more than 1,000
new agents this year.
We are enormously proud
of our partnership
with the bureau. The FBI works with the
ADL to host civil rights and hate crime
training for our state and local counterparts through
a number of programs.
We have made law enforcement and society mandatory,
as you've heard,
for all new agents, and we will continue
that. We have also made it mandatory
for all National Academy participants, and these are
law enforcement officials from around the country and
around the world who come and train
for 10 weeks at Quantico.
47,000
law enforcement officers have gone through that training.
Together with the ADL, we have created the
hate crimes training manual, a fantastic resource
for all law enforcement partners in this country.
And you and the ADL, of course, have
even greater reach.
You have trained more than 12,000
law enforcement personnel last year alone, and I
wanna thank you for that. This past January,
your North Texas Oklahoma office worked with my
Dallas division
to sponsor a one day seminar for a
150
state,
local, and federal law enforcement officers from 40
different agencies. At the FBI since 2010,
we have participated in more than a 100
training sessions sponsored by the ADL
on extremism,
terrorism, and hate crimes all around the country.
Over the years, the partnership between the a
FBI and the ADL has only grown stronger.
Now if this sounds a little bit like
a love letter to the ADL,
it is because I intended so. Wow. I
labeled that speech 3 years ago
a love letter to the ADL.
3 years later, I can say from the
perspective of the FBI,
we are still in love with you.
That's wild.
I mean, it's so crazy that we can
literally see that, the influence.
Right? I'm gonna play some stuff for you
right now to make sure in case you
missed it about the ADL and the reality
of its history. But how do you miss
that?
Right? How aggressive that is?
And and let's not forget, the ADL
and the antisemitism
dark cloud, the reality of that lie. It
was anything Palestinian.
Now you can't argue. You can't make that
claim. There's plenty of Palestinian entities out there,
the vast majority, in my opinion, that aren't
even remotely connected to what they want that
to be. Doesn't matter, though. Any Palestinian flag,
any protest, antisemitism,
that's the lie. It was aggressively pushed, and
that's what they're doing. And that's been seeding
through this country. And you it's not just
this and the ADL, guys. The reason that
was allowed to see through and basically
train every FBI agent and local police for
that matter from the IDF
is because of the control. It wasn't the
other way around. That has been going on
for a long time. Now here are some
points to make around the FBI, and then
we'll show you some clips around the ADL
to make it all come together.
But if you don't remember this yeah. And
this is just a sampling
of horrifying stories. This one's been the most
popular. Great article from Matt Agaras from the
Free Thought Project. Parrots catch FBI and plot
to force mentally ill son to be a
right wing terrorist.
I mean, if if of all of them,
if you wanna read one that's gonna make
you so angry,
this is exactly
what it sounds like. There's no there's not
any air in the room. The parents literally
caught them. This guy was a struggling I
think it was slightly autistic,
mental issues,
had no friends, was desperate to make friends,
and they literally spent the longest time trying
to convince this guy to go out and
commit terrorist acts and that he just wanted
to make a friend. And ultimately pulled back
at the last second because he wasn't really
a terrorist. He just was saying what they
wanted to hear to have friends. And they
kept pushing it until he got caught.
And every other time, if the parents hadn't
caught them, they probably would've framed them anyway
because that's what they do. And, guys, the
New York Times has written about this. That
how many times the FBI basically set up
their own plots and then catch them. Now
you they argue that it's because they're trying
to trap people.
The reality is in most of these cases,
they're just like this. It ends up where
they were never you can decide for yourself.
Read them for yourself. It doesn't matter whether
you think it's 1 out of a 100
or they you know, every case. The reality
is in this case, they tried to force
this child into this position for their benefit.
That's not unique if you actually do your
due diligence. Here's another one.
This one is from 2018 also by oh,
this is Rachel Blevins, but for free thought
free thought project. After FBI lets, Florida shooter
shooting happen,
Media now praising them for arming mentally ill
man in fake attack. It's the same story.
It's this one this one is pretty much
just as bad, actually.
This one, this is from Rachel Blevins as
well. Mainstream media, this is 2,018.
Mainstream media admits FBI groomed terrorists for 4th
July attack. Gave him supplies. I think this
is the one yeah. This is the one
oh, wait. No.
I thought it was the little, toy cars.
Doesn't look like it.
Yeah. Maybe not. There but there are it
might still be unless I'm just remembering the
words wrong. The point is one of these
was, like, basically where they have they were
allowing them to they train like, getting these
guys to use these little toy cars to,
like, roll out with bombs. And he same
thing. He pulled back the last second. He
was like, I'm not gonna do this. And
they arrested him. And was like, he was
planning an attack. And it's like, well, you
were planning an attack. Keith said no, and
you're still arrested anyway. The guy's in jail.
Well, it's the same with this one. Make
sure media admits they groomed him for this
attack, gave him supplies. And when they don't
follow through, in most cases, they arrest him
anyway. This is a major one. This site's
both a,
Intercept article.
Oops.
Alright. It seems it didn't show up down
at the bottom. It's in there somewhere in
the show notes. An Intercept article that makes
this that's where the image comes from, as
well as a I think this also has
the New York Times article. Both of which
argue that over 90% of all the things
they've stopped in the past can be sourced
back to something that they had a hand
in creating.
And then simply, the article is why how
why the FBI manufactures terrorism.
That's what the image is right there. I
mean, it's
I mean and this by the way, the
reason this is so important for the bigger
picture, I'm sure you've already gone there if
you watched my show in general, is this
is what Zionism is.
This is where this all comes from. So
now, you got the FBI being trained by
an extension of that same agenda, and that's
why you see them manufacturing events like this.
I'll I'll just play this quick because I
think it's relevant in this conversation. You've stated
it before. Certainly, the Zionists have used it
and brought it, in fact, to the area.
Terrorism as we know it today, the planting
of bombs in marketplaces and so on and
so forth, was, in fact, introduced into the
Middle East by the Zionists in the twenties.
But the net result of of Zionist,
terrorism and and violence in the in the
1st 3rd of 20th century has brought forth,
to my mind, the the anomaly, the
horrific and
unacceptable status in the Middle East today of
the state of Israel, which is in fact
an armed garrison state,
which now exports more arms and distributes violence
all around the world,
vastly disproportionate to its size. I mean, in
that respect, I think it's a it's it's
a horrible cycle
of violence. But in it all, I think
the Palestinian is the victim. There's no question
about that.
I think it's obvious.
I think, you know,
whether a professor or somebody else, the point
I think is obvious that this is historically
accurate. And I think the overlap when it
comes to the FBI being trained by the
ADL and then going on to fake their
own terrorist attacks starts to feel a little
consistent.
Here's another one. This is from 2 2023.
The FBI's entrapment of Americans continues with latest
arrest of an 18 year old with development
of
Americans continues with latest arrest of an 18
year old with developmental issues. This you think
this is an accident?
This is they they're seeking these things out.
I mean, it's too consistent.
Here's another one. Oh, excuse me. This is
the interview from, Jay make sure you watch
the full thing. His his documentary is only
24 minutes long.
Is Israelis is the ADL a spy organization?
It's the it's the conversation.
The title was true nature of the ADL
and how it spies on Americans for Israel,
which I don't I think is, I mean,
watch the it's obvious when you watch this.
I think the data, Whitney's broken this thing
down as well, is undeniable.
Very, very clear. And here's a couple of
the clips from that. Now you should check
the full thing out.
Is
an Israeli spy organization
masking around as a supposed civil rights group
and doing real harm to the Jewish community
writ large in order to run cover for
the state of Israel.
And don't forget the that's just the end
of that first clip. Don't forget the overlap
with green blot, which you're gonna see right
here. Don't forget the point of Twitter recently
changing its algorithm after it got pressure from
things like this, and here you'll hear him
tell you how he's able to do that.
All of this the the common thread has
never been more clear right now. It's
everywhere.
Who have the power to monitor social media
activity across all major platforms
and change social media algorithms the way they
see fit. Don't believe me? Well, here's Jonathan
Greenblatt, the CEO of the ADL.
We work with YouTube to have we to
get them to change their algorithms. We work
with Facebook on trying to use a redirect
method. So when you search for holocaust, you
get directed to, like, a Yad Vashem
page. We opened
a center in Silicon Valley back in 2017,
and the woman who runs it, she's the
next Facebook executive.
I have software engineers and data scientists working
at ADL.
We're monitoring
all this stuff, and we're working with all
the platforms, by the way. Google and YouTube
and Meta and Twitter and Reddit and Steam
and Amazon, all these companies. From, like, Apple
to Zoom, we work with all of them.
Some might call that a conspiracy fact.
Just saying. And if their ability to influence
And that's the still the still the same
to this day, by the way, with Twitter
more than any of them. That's stated by
Yaccarino and Musk. They are partnered with the
ADL.
One of the many, many red flags that
are being ignored. Big tech and media isn't
disturbing enough.
The ADL also partners with payment platforms like
PayPal to monitor online transactions
and cancel payment processing for those whose speech
they disapprove of. Remember, they stole $6,000 from
me, PayPal.
Now it starts to make sense. Just to
understand this, is this simply a research effort,
or is the ultimate goal, I imagine, to
effectively defund them, which is to say that
PayPal would effectively turn off the spigot
or at least turn off the ability for
them to fundraise using PayPal. That's correct, Andrew.
Watch the full interview with him, with me
and him, as well as his 24 minute
documentary. Well worth your time. Now oh, there's
one more thing I'll play as well. This
was about 1 minute. And this just goes
into the spy overlapping with and the the
spy agency of the ADL,
all also overlapping with the CIA,
which by the way, seems to be an
overlap in regard to JFK. The investigation
was done by the San Francisco,
district attorney's office among the data that came
out was that they would,
spy on organizations
that were critical of Israel, spy on organizations,
that were critical of South Africa.
And they would pass that information on to
Israel, and they pass the information on to
South Africa. This is apartheid South Africa.
According to a declassified FBI document,
one prominent investigator working on behalf of the
ADL was Ray Bullock, a San Franciscan with
the code name Kao, who posed as a
small time art dealer in the Castro District.
Working clandestinely with Bullock was Thomas Girard, a
detective with the San Francisco Police Department's intelligence
unit and a 3 year veteran of the
CIA.
Bamford wrote that, quote, Girard would illegally supply
Bullock with confidential data from the police and
FBI computer files about Americans,
many of them pro Palestinian activists that were
targets of the ADL.
His reports were then submitted to the ADL's
executive director in San Francisco, Richard Hirschotte. Court
documents ultimately exposed that Bullock and or Hirschotte
admitted that the ADL or its agents gave
information to the government of Israel
and sold information to the government of South
Africa, including information secretly collected from Jewish peace
groups.
Is that
anti Semitic?
Well, interesting.
I mean, what you're think about this. What
he's talking about goes back a long way.
Right? So how long have they been spying
on Palestinians
simply because they're Palestinian?
And and Jewish groups in this country that
don't support Zionism.
You can't this isn't some post October 7th
dynamic, guys. This goes back a long way.
And I'll include this for you. My interview
with Corey Hughes was Israel behind the assassination
of JFK. His work seems to show very
clearly that was the case. But you can
decide for yourself.
And then I'll include as well that my
tweet, my thread here, basically, showing you all
the examples of Trump
many, many, many times saying that he will
side with Israel over American interests. That Americans
should control congress and rightly so. Literally says
that in these clips. Or that he'll remove
the Jew haters from the country, which again,
the point is simply that you whether somebody
hates somebody based on their religion alone makes
them disgusting. But that's a free speech right,
to say what you want and think what
you want. Yeah. And I'll say the same.
They're disgusting. Whether it's a Christian or a
Jewish person or whatever else. But it is
free speech. And it is the ideological freedom
that we pretend that we have in this
country. But, of course, he's saying remove them
from the country because they simply hate Jews.
But on top of that, most of them
don't. We're talking about Palestinian supporters that are
framed in that way. Either way, it does
not cut you the idea that you can
remove them from the country for a foreign
country should be problematic for anybody that understands
their rights.
As well as the burning the flag or
using words, you know, same stuff we talked
about before. Now, also, on the note, the
aspect this is not just the United States.
What's interesting is you can see the trickle
down effect to places like Australia and New
Zealand and
like this.
Peter Dutton,
leader of the Liberal Party of the Australia,
freedom member of Dickerson, blah blah blah. So
it says, anti semitism has surged over
700%
in Australia. It should have never come to
this.
He says, when vile acts unfold at the
Sydney Opera House, which remember what that really
was, another propagandized event. It says strong leadership
should have stopped the spread of hate and
stay. Australians are met with weakness.
There's another political opportunist siding with Israel thinking
that's gonna get him, you know, which was
usually does.
The point is, as doctor Amira Dalton says,
when antisemitism
is defined as criticism of Israel, of course,
it's going to surge. But just like the
400% in the United States with a lie,
so too is this. Doesn't mean there's not
racism, guys. It always is there, unfortunately. But
it is part of the world. People can
think what they want. Here,
it is a lie to push you into
a position to that I mean, or literally
make you count for your own interests.
Now, on the ceasefire conversation to end the
show today, which we still have a lot
to get to, I wanna make sure because
right now, the reason I I say this
for the end is because really, it's a
lot about, like, looking at what we already
said. We're already seeing what we're seeing. But
tomorrow is when this comes to pass.
So I we'll we'll be talking about this
more in-depth. And Robert, I believe, is gonna
have an article for tomorrow as well. And
I'd have an article from Robert or Derek
going out tomorrow as well.
But this is what he, I my show
on 15th.
The Trump admin's missing ethics pledges, which I
think directly relates to what's going on right
now. Like, the problematic
potential
foreign nation influence on Trump and other aspects
of this as well as people in his
in his team like Pam Bondi, for example.
I mean, I don't know if there's a
I'm gonna I'm not gonna go into it
again because I'll go off on it. But
the fact that you're not hearing this called
out by democrats despite
as of, like, a couple days ago, there
being no indication it's happened has to show
you that they are on the same side.
Or that's a good indication.
Because why would they not use that example
to go after him? Which is a huge
problem
if they wanted it to be for somebody
that we're being told is, you know, their
entire world was about stopping Trump.
How does that make sense?
Now the point today is the new ceasefire
agreement Israel already plans to break. Now I
wrote that on 15th.
So I think it's important that you remember
it because that and it's not just because
I guessed. It's because of the evidence from
Horetz, from Ynet News, from different individuals associated
with the Israel conversation.
And so we looked at it broadly. We
looked at what's already happened before.
And objectively, it seemed like the most logical
outcome.
Kinda easy, isn't it? I'm not I'm not
assuming or guessing. We're just going, here's my
opinion based on what we see before. Not
partisan narratives, not, you know, whatever else. But
so far, they've done this every time. Okay.
That's the first point. Here, we can see
evidence of already people in, let's say, the
Knesset,
publicly saying, Trump said we could break the
deal. So you go, okay. Well, that's a
huge thing to say. Maybe he's lying. Then
we have a Harrettes article that comes out
and says, they're going to break the deal.
Here's why. Okay? Then we get a Ynet
news article that comes out and says, very
clearly, Trump made a deal to let them
annex the West Bank if they take this
first stage, but he's gonna let them break
it in the second. And that's all gonna
I mean, it's very specific. But so I
simply framed it like this because I think
that's obvious.
And then,
surprise surprise,
it's right exactly where we are right now.
But, again, tomorrow, we'll have more information.
Here's Robert's article, which you should read. Again,
he nailed this more than me. This Gaza
ceasefire, a US Israel defeat or another trick.
Now, I'm not I'm I wanna wait to
go into this even more. I think Robert
and I might do an interview soon about
this.
But the point is that this is what
he's getting into is what I just highlighted
for the most part with more internal detail,
but also the the the larger
couple different ways this could go. And that's
why I'm gonna get into more of the
Ben Gavir point as well. But, you know,
asking, like, you know, why why, like, why
would they agree with now? What are the
consequences?
He does a great job with this article.
But overall, I think the main point is
we both feel like this is most likely
not what it appears to be. Now he
points out a couple of good things in
this the the couple different directions that it
could go.
My my like I said in the last
show that we just highlighted, but I I
stand by what I said even then. But
I think either that this ends up going
forward,
which but that that's what's funny. On 15th,
I what hadn't seen we're seeing today, and
that's when I said that either it's gonna
go forward,
right, and it's ultimately gonna be then people
going, you know, that's you know, Trump did
that and Trump 6, which is already happening.
And then Netanyahu
blaming
essentially taking that loss, but then ultimately being
able to break it, which will benefit him.
So they both get that win from it.
And and they both and so Trump goes
on acting like he caused this, but he
basically ends up blaming Hamas for firing on
them and, you know, goes back to the
square one, but they both get that benefit
from it, Which kinda seems like where it's
going. Alternatively,
I I was wondering whether this might just
break down before it even gets there, like
they've done already.
Which still is not off the table, mind
you. Who knows what could happen tomorrow? All
of a sudden, they fake another rocket in
a field and suddenly, mom has attacked us
and it's that's happened more than once. And
Harratus covered that. Like, literally, fake reports of
bombs being used to bomb Gaza. That's happened
plenty of times. That's not to say that
all bombs are fake or that rockets landing
in field don't happen. But it's funny how
often that is the case. But Robert reported
on 17th after the article, the Gaza ceasefire
has in fact been ratified by Israel. What
was interesting is before
when I was caught talking on 15th, there
were a lot of accounts, in including mainstream
media that were saying the deal was done.
The ceasefire has been significant. But that wasn't
the case.
On 17th now, that is when it finally
became official because Netanyahu, after choosing to bomb
a bunch of people and tear down a
bunch of homes,
dragged his feet until he finally said okay,
and then gave them another extension until apparently
tomorrow, which they've continued to murder people in
Gaza. But it's funny how many people said
that it was done before it was actually
done. Propaganda.
But it says Israel lost its war despite
committing a genocide, failed to beat Hamas, failed
to retake its captain by force, nothing will
bring back our martyred loved ones but and
friends, but is but god willing, the people
will breathe now. I I completely agree. Hopefully,
hopefully,
this goes
I mean, again, even just a momentary brief
pause is is
a relief from the ongoing
torture they're suffering.
But hopefully, because this is, you know, that
we can work into some way to make
this not, you know, my point is that
there's some possibility that this could end up
continuing.
And there's just a hope there.
I'm not very I'm not very positive about
it because I think these people are horrifying.
But maybe there's some other maneuver that can
happen. Maybe Trump will see is in his
interest. That's what I've been saying about opportunism,
guys. Make him feel that it's in his
interest just to push back on this. I
find that really hard to believe with all
the money and influence and possible threatened blackmail,
whatever else, but maybe,
maybe if you can convince him that it's
in his interest to pile up the truth.
Jeremy Scahill points out the Israeli cabinet, this
is on 17th, has approved an arrangement where
Israel will heavily bomb and attack Gaza from
now until Sunday.
What a stupid that's just so crazy to
me. That's what's happening. It will then try
to get as many of its captives freed
as possible and then look for ways to
continue its war with Gaza. That's how the
deal is being spun.
He says when certainly not the only while
certainly not the only factor, a major one
will be what Trump actually wants. His administration
is stacked with hawkish pro Israel figures and
there are many ominous signs, but Trump also
wants other deals
that would be hindered by continuation of full
war scale with Gaza. That's my point. Right?
It's not I I mean, frankly, I don't
think it's about him doing right. That's my
opinion. It's about what benefits them. That's most
politicians, or all for that matter, in my
opinion. But
I agree with this. That ultimately, it may
be that this is just what they want
for a larger agenda. And maybe Israel's involved
with that.
Or the other way around. But
on top of that, that they've continued to
do this, guys. This is the sad part.
This is on 17th.
I I think, did I download this?
No. I didn't grab that. So just as
you can see it here. So all you're
gonna see here so this just simply says
an Israeli army quadcopter just dropped the bomb
on the roof of what's actually the Nama
Association,
Trade Association, and then the town of Jabaliyah,
Northern Gaza Strip.
So the point is
there's no rationale, no justification up like there
has been for anything else. But in the
midst of, like, you're moments away from a
ceasefire,
and that's the place just continue to do
this. I mean, watch. All it does, it
drops the bomb
on the top of the
roof. Coming up. Hold on.
There it goes. Drops the bomb, flies away,
and then right at the end, it explodes.
You know, I mean, where where is the
investigation?
I mean, we're still pretending they care about
civilian deaths. Like, the idea that we're supposed
to pretend that they went through and made
sure there was no bad guys. But then
if they did that, or rather no civilians,
but if they did that, that would mean
they wouldn't be legally allowed to do that.
See, so either way you look at it,
they're breaking the law in everything that they
do. And the world knows this.
This is just them destroying more homes because
there's also plenty of videos of bulldozers going
around tearing down as many homes as they
possibly can before they are allowed to go
back to their homes.
Why? Because they're murderous, torturous monsters. Because they
don't want them to have a place to
go back to, if they even have any
left anyway.
It's unbelievable. Exactly. It's diabolical. It is horrifying.
But, of course, Blinken says exactly what we
were just telling you. I don't know why
I this and what Biden just said. I'll
play that next. It's weird. It's almost like
you know what I read this as?
After the like, with Obama, for example, or
any of the rest of like, as they
leave the presidency, they go through this weird,
immediate transformation
where it's like they're super cool now and
we're just telling you the truth and we're
all
all that shows me is they're all on
the same page. They all work together and
it's the same thing they all do. In
this case,
acting like we're suddenly going to admit that,
you know, what we're being told about is
real. But in a I'll show you what
he says. In this case, Blinken's admitting that
the deal they just accepted was the same
deal he proposed in May. Well, how are
we supposed to take that? You mean the
one that Hamas agreed to that we can
prove? Well, all that proves to you is
exactly like we already know, that Israel and
you have been deliberately upholding this deal or
holding up the deal.
Because it was the same deal in May.
Exactly. That's what, what's I forget his name.
Issa, I think, from Electronic Intifada.
He's right. It was the same deal. And
they didn't want it, so he pretended it
didn't happen. And now they're just doing it
now because now they want this to happen.
Or, you know, and see, actually, that that's
my read on it. Otherwise, why would it
make sense? And that needs some influence, if
that's the case, the way we read all
this. Why would they want this to happen
now? Why would they allow it to happen
now if it actually happens tomorrow? That needs
to change the way you see this because
that what that tells me is there is
an agenda happening here. It's not Israel being
forced by Trump to do what it doesn't
want. That there's an ultimate agreement for where
they go with this. Whether that, again, becomes
the wet like, the well, I'll get to
that in a second because it's one of
these statements. But the allowance of the West
Bank annexation. That's one of the things Robert
thinks is that ultimately,
this becomes
as long as they can give them a
win somewhere else, then it might distract them.
Now I'll I'll come back to on the
it overlaps to the Ben Gavir point.
Here's what Blinken said
back
in October 2023. Max Blumenthal shared this
where he's basically doing the same thing the
rest did. Actually, today acting like this is
finally happening because the mosque did so, did
the right thing or whatever. Even though here
he is pushing fake atrocity propaganda to stop
the deal that should have happened.
And let's again, if you don't know this,
Hamas was agreeing to this on October 9th,
October 10th. Both deals that were full exchanges
for a ceasefire.
That was reported by Times of Israel. They
didn't want it because they thought they could
get what they wanted out of this, and
maybe they did. Gaza's gone, guys. They flattened
the entire thing.
The point, nonetheless, is that they were making
sure it didn't come to pass as they
went on to murder children and then armed
them to do so every single day.
Including and if you'll forgive me,
because, again, these
stories recede so quickly.
A family at his breakfast table at one
of the kibbutzes.
By the way, the profound irony
of attacks on kibbutzes, the very people who
most ardently believe and want a future of
peace be Oh, you mean the illegal settlements?
That's what those are, by the way. Illegal
occupied settlements.
So
human shield, essentially.
Israelis and Palestinians, a future of 2 states.
They do not. Not even really. 4.
A young boy and girl,
6 8 years old, and their parents around
the breakfast table.
The father has eye gouged out in front
of his kids. Fake story. The mother's breast
cut off. Proven fake by Harritts over and
over, by the way. Well, before he made
this point, by the way. The girl's foot
amputated.
The boy's fingers cut off before they were
executed,
and then their executioner sat down and had
a meal. It's all fake.
I mean, if you don't I I hope
you have the wherewithal to take the time.
We I the only reason that we even
make the case now is because we've done
it 45 times. Harats and the rest of
them have made very clear cases how this
is straight up
manufactured lies. Like everything else we've seen, like,
very clearly proven. That's what this society is
dealing with,
and no nation could tolerate that. And as
we've said repeatedly, as president Biden has repeatedly
made clear,
Israel has not only the right, but the
obligation to defend itself and to try to
take every possible step to make sure this
doesn't happen again.
Including genocide, apparently. That it is vitally important
how Israel does this.
And That's supposed to be the one like,
like, put in put in a free what
a, you know, international law compliant sort of
way while committing a genocide. Right? It's it's
a stupid carve out to make it sound
like you care about the law. The imperative
of doing everything possible to protect civilians as
well as to care for those. While targeting
civilians verifiably on a daily basis, which he
knows.
Let's all make a point at the end.
Like, this guy is the scapegoat, guys. Blinken
will forever be known, and I think that
was the plan. I think Blinken is a
scapegoat. It's not just Blinken. In fact, he's
just a puppet.
Who are endangered by the conflict. But deserves
full accountability, without question.
As well as to care for those
who are endangered by the conflict
is something that we feel strongly.
You're, of course, right. I that that's that's
good. Right? Just I think it's important to
hear the lies, but check this out, by
the way, on a side note. It's crazy
to me that the geriatric congress and, like,
I think what this speaks to is the
reality of
what Israel is allowing to be in place.
Like, I know it's it's I know some
people are just so outraged about this entire
conversation. If we can't acknowledge by now how
alarmingly obvious the influence is and the APAC
funds 97%
of the current congress. Like, that's their statement,
guys. It's just obvious. But I wanna point
out that it's so alarming whether or not
that's the case. I just think that's an
interesting overlap. That we have all these people
in sit in positions of power that are
clearly I mean, remember the report that came
out a long time ago about how many
senility drugs and, like, Alzheimer drugs that are
in the the congressional doctor, essentially. It's it's
not you're not allowed to know who, but
they have a record of what they have
there and that got put out and it's
alarming.
Anybody that's on Alzheimer's, drugs, or anything like
that should not be in a position to
make decisions that could influence
anything, in my opinion. But just look at
this look at what's her name? Senator Collins
here. She's got, you know and look, I'm
not I'm not trying to hate on elderly
people. Like, I it's not about that. Ever
we all go through it and elder people
deserve your respect.
Now, sec sec in a conversation separate from
that, congress people that commit genocide and allow
it do not. So it's not that I'm
saying she's you know, it's it's about the
fact that these people are in their position
whatever age they are. But I think it's
interesting on top of all that,
watch her look look at her head. Are
endangered by the conflict
is something that we feel strongly.
You're, of course, right that this is a
special burden. I had a teacher like that
growing up. It's a it's a it's a
thing. It's like a muscle spat issue where
her head's shaking. My point is just you
get these people that are getting older and
older, and we see them like Feinstein or
Pelosi or Waters or any number of people
that are just clearly not truly there. Or,
what's his name? The turtle.
You know, these people aren't McConnell. These people
are clearly struggling.
I just think it's crazy to me.
But the point is lying.
Pushing propaganda to stop people from having what
they you know, from stopping their atrocities
on them. Using fake atrocities just to prolong
the atrocities of Palestinians.
Now I'll include this. This is the point
from any of the articles you'll find. This
is the first one I saw. Gaza ceasefire
to begin Sunday after Israel approves deal in
a marathon cabinet meeting.
Of course, the point is that they're all
pushing back. Like, most of them don't want
anything like this.
But here's what Vanessa said on top of
it all. To all those pumping up Trump
for the ceasefire deal just before his inauguration,
please remember that it's that it's tag team
foreign policy in the United States. Mercy sees
it. 2 party illusion, guys. There it's just
a it's like with COVID or anything else.
She says Trump was elected to continue the
Zionist alliance road map. Biden's role now think
globalism and all lots of other elements. Biden's
role was to achieve total devastation to pave
the way for normalization
with Zionist entity,
especially
Saudi Arabia
that has been waiting in the wing since
October 7th. Trump will move US Zionist operations
to new arenas that may include China, Iran,
Jordan, Egypt, Pakistan.
The Hayat al Sham, that's the Syrian terrorist
organization that they put in charge,
their atrocities, all co also orchestrated and deadly,
will lead to foreign intervention by US, Israel,
France, UK, Germany undercover of protecting minorities.
And John Kerry's plan b, 2016,
will come to fruition.
The partitioning of Syria and the regime change
alliance successfully,
successful resource and land grab.
Funny how the Republicans can't stop talking about
land grabs, but can't pay attention to the
most obvious one day place right now. But
what's crazy to me is that this is
you know, it's it's like with any of
these groups. You think Haider al Sham knows
they're gonna be thrown under the bus? They're
gonna be used as the very it's like
the rest of them. Saddam Hussein or Osama
bin Laden. They were assets of the United
States government till they weren't all of a
sudden. That's how this works.
Either way, it's her prediction. It could very
well be that they use them forever. But
the end of the day point is they
could easily go, look at what they've done,
which we've been pointing out from day 1.
They won't make it out to be day
1. They'll simply say, a new sect has
suddenly done this, and we have to step
in, push back into Syria, which, by the
way, they never left, obviously, despite what Trump
lied about.
She says Turkey is more powerful than ever
and has outmaneuvered regional players. The Neo Ottoman
Empire is no longer a maniacal fantasy. All
countries neighboring Israel will be defanged like Syria
to prevent any threat to Israel's national security
emerging now or in the future. Trump did
nothing
that can be considered to be for the
benefit of Palestine.
He closed the Gaza file to open new
ones globally.
I agree completely.
Times of Israel.
Israel lost a war. That's how they're framing
this. As of the 15th, the Israeli newspaper
describes the ceasefire agreement with Hamas as a
clear win for Hamas, a total failure for
Israel. Now, you could argue it's a a
failure for well, I mean, let's put it
this way. I think it's clearly a fail
a failure for Israel for what they claimed
was their objective, which maybe that wasn't their
objective. I don't think it really was at
the end of the day. It was just
Palestinian suffering and annihilation, the ethnic cleansing displacement,
like always. But at the same time, it
was a win for Hamas in the sense
that they ultimately didn't let them take them
out. But overall, the Palestinian people clearly suffered,
which, which, you know, it's it's the fault
of the people doing the bombing and killing.
Right? And arguably, the Palestinians do support any
group that is pushing back against Israel. But
clearly, the actions of October 7th led to
this. The point though is that you can't
blame the person fighting for their resistance.
You could blame the person that's committing a
genocide in response to a legal action though,
which is exactly what it was. For Geneva
convention, occupied territory has the right to arm
resistance whether or not they were attacked. Any
crimes committed on top of that are still
crimes.
But this, guys,
is interesting.
Because at the end of the day, Israel's
coming out. And and clearly, I don't think
they're gonna be accountable for this if the
US has its way. So they're not getting
charged for anything. Netanyahu mains power.
This
could hurt Netanyahu in one way. We'll talk
about Ben Gavir next. But I think overall,
this is kind of a framing
that is meant to ultimately lead to what
kind of what Vanessa Bailey is pointing to.
That's the way I kinda feel about it.
But what the wait and see ultimately over
the next really tomorrow and then over the
next month. But it says the article sums
up some gained achievements by Hamas. It says
that Israel is now weakened compared to what
it was before that, which I I agree.
And also with Lebanon and everything else. But
it says, and Hamas is already rebuilding its
military capabilities with more than 12,000 fighters, which
I I don't think they ever really got
diminished, to be honest. It also says they
were successfully gained world public opinion. That well,
that wasn't really even Hamas. That's part of
it. It was Palestine.
Palestinians.
And I think that was the biggest failure
for them.
Now Ben Gavir,
on
16th says his party will quit, and you've
all probably seen this, if the government will
implements the hostage deal. Now this would change
a lot. Depends on whether Netanyahu goes to
him and says, hey. Look. We're gonna break
it on the 2nd phase. That was the
agreement.
Right? So it's interesting. But
I don't think at the I think at
the end of the day, Ben Gavir,
as like with Smotrich and the rest, they're
rabid, like, prophetic extremists.
Zionists. Crazy.
And ultimately didn't want anything like this. No
concession.
They just wanted to commit to continue the
genocide. And so, what we see is as
of this is today,
far right Ben Gavir, the Tsaretz, resigns from
Netanyahu government over hostage deal. Now, there's a
couple just a couple of thoughts that that,
Robert shared that I wanna relay to you.
And ultimately, the point is I was kinda
saying a second ago is that he's saying
if they if they essentially don't go back
to war
after the first phase, He argues that Ben
Gavir, at least, can
completely pull his party. Right now, he's no
longer a minister apparently, but it's still in
the Knesset through, I think, his party organization.
But the point is being he could pull
the whole thing out, which would collapse the
government,
Which I guess the point would then be
they have to then go back to elections,
and
that's pretty chaotic.
Right? Netanyahu might not necessarily
remain in power. And he'll go to prison,
guys. That's what's happening right now. Like, he
that would have happened a long time ago
if he wasn't already
in power continuously.
They've been writing about it forever. He's one
of the most unpopular people there. He's got,
like, multiple indictments. He he'll go to prison.
So that might be an interesting thing to
think about. How Ben Gavir could play this
role, and he is arguably more concerning than
even Netanyahu.
But he goes then then he says that
could collapse that pulling out could collapse the
government,
and, ultimately, the it could take months before
some kind of new election rollout. What could
that mean for Hamas or Palestine? It's interesting.
There's a huge gap there. And, ultimately, that
I agree with this, that the West Bank
annexation is gonna play a big part in
this. That, ultimately, if he allows that, which
clearly I mean, he already agreed with Mary
Nelson. That was a public conversation. Herrette's headline
was what she demanded was best bank West
Bank annexation. That's a crime, guys. They're illegal
no matter what.
And so if he gives them that, what
she already agreed to, and then Netanyahu uses
that to say we can take this instead,
maybe that'll stave that off.
But he says that the the oh, the
the people the fact that they're
about to or already kind of starting to
withdraw from Gaza, his point is that should
they decide to wanna go back to the
war,
that it would be a a difficult thing
to bring it all back like the whole
thing. Apparently, there's just a lot of resources
involved.
So I would argue that means 1 or
2 things. Either if they I which I
think is obvious. That's my opinion. I think
I've already stated they're going to go back
to this. They're going to break this. I
think that was the agreement that they're going
to kind of fake pulling out.
Sort of leave them in a certain position,
like, you know, basically present the idea that
they've pulled out of Gaza, but not really
pull out of Gaza. That's what I would
guess would happen.
But then he says, that,
oh, interestingly enough, this is actually that Netanyahu
should it go the way that doesn't work
for him, then he goes, we might see
Netanyahu flee to the United States, which is
interesting because he's a war criminal. And that
the ICC is our I mean, everybody's calling
for him to be arrested. But of course,
we already saw that he doesn't get arrested
here. So he may flee to the United
States. And then we would have a point
where they're protecting a war criminal. I mean,
it's be crazy. But that would be possible.
But if if he loses power, he's not
gonna stay in Israel. That's my point because
he'll go to prison.
And then he worries that and this is
my biggest concern that because people like Ben
Gavir and Smolich, which are the most alarming
in my opinion, that religious Zionism, that's one
of the parties but kind of like a
general concept,
are are desperate to take power. And a
lot of these very, very, very dangerous groupings
in the country, which seems to be a
large majority,
are very adamant about doing so. And their
main point, that's the whole settler movement concept.
They they want to rapidly expand. They want
to take over territory. That's greater Israel and
well beyond. So it's funny, as always, how
everything they're pointing at everybody else is exactly
what they're openly wanting to do.
Colonialism.
Right? To expand. Globalism. It's exactly what we're
talking about. So it's very interesting to see
how this plays out. So over the next,
like, up really in the next few days,
I think we're gonna see an interesting development
if Ben Gavir decides to kind of yank
the whole party based on the actions that
come next. But it depends on whether or
not there's another deal behind it that we
don't see.
So last few points here.
We talked about this yesterday
or rather the last show. And this was
the first one from hertz. Right? The point
was that one of their analysts were reporting
that the the ceasefire agreement was a ruse.
And this was just based on his opinion.
The simple idea was if they were gonna
do this, they would've just done it. They
wouldn't leave the stages. It it sets them
up to be able to break it, which
seems to be what now people were talking
about. Very important to think about. Then we
had Muhammad Shehada pointing to the Ynet news
article, which was more specific.
Simply and this was speaking from inside the
the the current Israeli government, saying that we
know it's a secret deal between Trump and
a gift bag from Trump,
which all which includes lifting all sanctions, which
is not what we just heard them say?
Isn't that what we just heard Rubio talking
or rather Cruz through and saying Rubio we're
gonna do?
Yes.
And
Israel's spyware, Pegasus,
Israeli settlers, extremists allowing mesh West Bank annexation.
Everything we're talking about.
Spyware infiltration,
West Bank annexation, more settlements.
It's pretty crazy.
And, I I mean, I can't that's so
many things that we are seeing happen that
this validated,
but you have to wait for action. Right?
But this is what we were seeing, and
this is on 14th.
It was all they're already going, look. This
is a ruse. They're gonna lie to you.
They're gonna allow them to do this. It'll
pretend it'll happen. They'll break it on well,
actually, the break it on the second phase
is what comes out of the new information.
But here's the Y Net news article. You
can read it for yourself. You just gotta
translate it. I have that up from there.
I don't know what your what your browser
does, but that's the article.
Now, Craig Murray says on 16th,
I was in Beirut when Israel carpet bombed
it a few hours
before ceasefire here came into effect.
I have also seen them break the ceasefire
every day since
in Lebanon.
I mean, guy, this is a respected
journalist in Lebanon
who's telling you, I watched them break the
ceasefire every day because that's what they do.
That's what the US government does. Whether in
Yemen as we talked about over the years
or right now in I mean, everywhere, guys.
Or in Syria. That's what they've always done.
Because they're not honest.
He said he says, I have also seen
them break the ceasefire every day. Except both
in expect both in Gaza.
The Israelis kill and the Israelis lie permanently.
You know, it's it's amazing how many people
seem to have that very clear statement that
don't get regarded as racism because they're political
insiders,
but then we pretend like we just don't
know this is the reality forever. Right? I
mean, if if the if the example of,
Wilkerson saying the Israelis lie. Right? We we
they're patent liars. We know this stuff because
we've been told over and over and over
the reality of what and the history shows
us these things. Let me let me preface
these remarks without never never ever believe
Israeli figures.
I've been in the government too long to
know that the Israelis are patent liars.
So going forward,
here is one of the first
on top of the other specific example. This
comes from the 16th, and this is a
member of the Knesset.
Jana, for oh, a dip wait. I thought
he was hold on.
It says she so he's in the news.
Make sure I didn't mix these up.
Oh. Oh. I'm oh, sorry. And that's what
it was. I've I'm just it's being translated.
So the point was ultimately,
he is reporting on the Lukud member saying
this for channel 14 news for for Israel.
And it's translated here first.
But it says the interesting political detail in
Lukud's response to Ben Gavir, the first. Basically,
this is the point. So like I said,
Ben Gavir pulling out of the of the
whole this whole party could collapse the government.
And so now they're going, woah. Don't hold
on. Basically,
we have a plan. We're going to break
it on the second. That's what they're saying.
Saying that the confirms the fear that would
torpedo the deal. Whoever dismantles the right wing
government will remember it as a scoundrel.
Hold on. It's this part here. And he
goes, basically saying,
contrary to Bank of America's statements, the current
deal allows Israel
to resume fighting
with an American guarantee,
to receive the necessary weapons and military equipment,
to maximize the number of live hostages will
be released, to maintain full control of the
fill the Philadelphia route, security buffer surrounding the
entire Gaza shit. All of these are supposed
to this is supposed to be the opposite
of what's happening.
So, of course, he could be wrong. He
could be lying. But we have mainstream Israeli
media citing a per a member of the
Likud party
from the Knesset and saying they have guarantees
from Erica that they're gonna be allowed to
resume fighting.
I mean, it's hard to ignore all of
this stuff, but it's certainly possible that it
could be wrong.
Here is Vivid, a very obvious Zionist propaganda
account saying, quoting Benjamin Netanyahu, and this is
how this tends to work. Saying, we have
received unequivocal guarantees,
and this is being stated publicly, from the
United States, and this is where you get
the if.
That if the negotiations on phase 2 fail,
which is that's the per that's what I
argue is going to happen. That they claim
they did even though that's rarely whatever happens.
And Hamas does not accept our security demands,
which will be something they change or something
kinda this is what they've always done, guys.
They'll return to intense fighting with complete backing
of the United States.
So if you're missing it, the point is
there's all these other people
just as usual
in Israeli media or in the Knesset, in
their government, saying, in places over Israel, not
necessarily on Fox News, they like, oh, the
US will let us go back to war
when we want to. They have guarantees that
if we do on the second, we're gonna
break it and we get to end it.
Right. So that's what they're saying publicly. But
then when he says it out here so
that the west can hear it, he frames
it as well. If they don't follow the
rules, then they said we can. That's not
what the agreement was based on everything else
we're hearing. That's Netanyahu's framing of it to
make it make sense for the western audiences.
And then, Vivid plays his role as that
medium. Right? He's the conduit. Like all the
rest of them, like, Elon Levy and the
rest. They pair it over to you so
you can get the propaganda.
As I simply said, this was always the
plan.
As even Israeli media covered days ago, it
was reported that Trump agreed to let Netanyahu
break the deal and blame Hamas. And Trump
will back Israel, and Netanyahu is allowed to
fully annex the West Bank, which is illegal.
And then I reported on 17th, and he's
not even waiting until the second phase to
murder more.
Seems and this is it says seems like
this was forensic architecture on 16th.
Even after the announcement of ceasefire, reports indicate
that the Israeli media is continuing to flatten
the remaining residential blocks in Northern Gaza. Right?
So just in case they had anywhere, they
might even be able to shelter from the
rain. Nah. Can't let that happen. Leaving displaced
civilians with no homes to return to. That's
the point.
Satellite images from January 2025 revealed widespread destruction
in Jibaliyah,
Beteliah, Bet Hunan, alongside expanding tent camps in
Gaza City.
They're just destroying everything. That's the whole point.
And I said it seems like Netanyahu can't
even wait until the 2nd phase to start
breaking the ceasefire, which technically hadn't started yet.
But the point is, you're in the midst
of a ceasefire agreement and you're just rapidly
bombing as much as you can before it
even happens.
Sad. It's disgusting. It shows you what they
really are.
Make sure I missed that.
So
here's Netanyahu speaking about this. This was from
the today.
President Trump and president Biden have provided full
backing to Israel's right to resume combat if
Israel reaches the conclusion that the negotiations over
the second stage are pointless. Well, that's interesting.
You know, easy it would be for them
to consider that the the the deal whether
or not being upheld in the right way
was just simply pointless for them.
So, I mean, this is just show they're
watering this down even after their own narrative.
If we need to resume combat, we will
with tremendous force, he says.
Are we is anybody even pretending for a
second this is not obviously gonna go the
way that they tell you it's gonna go?
I I mean, look, that's my opinion, obviously.
But it's there's so much evidence. They're literally
telling you that they're gonna break the deal.
Elected. He was completely Trump was completely
committed to the release of the hostages. We
spoke on Wednesday. He congratulated me on the
agreement, and he emphasized, and rightly so, that
the first stage is a temporary ceasefire.
This is what he said, a temporary ceasefire.
Towards the next stage is a big agreement.
We
are holding on to some significant
assets so that we can bring back all
of the hostages and in order to accomplish
all the goals of the war. Both president
Trump and president Biden have provided full backing
to Israel's right to resume fighting, to resume
combat if Israel reaches the conclusion that the
negotiations over the second stage are pointless.
Both Trump and Biden,
it's pretty spectacularly
obvious how how much consistency there is across
the paradigm. People just don't care to point
it out because it's inconvenient, or it's uncomfortable,
or it's not fun, or it breaks your
narrative. The truth is it's obvious they're in
the same direction. I truly appreciate that. I
also appreciate the decision of president Trump to
lift all the remaining restrictions
on the, providing of essential munitions and weapons
to the state of Israel. If we need
to As they're committing genocide, and as you
could prove that they're violating the law, breaking
blocking aid, I mean, every single one of
these things are against the law. But just
like Biden, Trump doesn't care about the international
law or even US law as long as
it supports Israel. Resume combat, we will do
so in new ways, and we will do
so
with tremendous
force. Yeah. Sounds exactly like the way Trump
would say it. Right? New ways? What, like,
so now we're gonna do is biological weapons?
I mean, maybe they already did that. Right?
So it seems they did, at least with
polio and everything else they talked about. Like,
in that conversation, The point was they openly
made the case that they would make that
continue or that they would allow it to
get bad. I argue there was more than
that, but that's my opinion.
Michael Tracey frames. It says Netanyahu says Trump
emphasized to him that the ceasefire is temporary
and Israel will have full backing to resume
the war in Gaza. He says Trump has
decided to lift all the remaining restrictions.
Can you imagine even saying that right now?
Like, knowing that he would say that, Trump
would say
that's
Trump or Biden or anybody else, when they
know and they do know that the world
sees this, wouldn't you think they'd try to
kinda walk quietly around it? No. They're coming
out. What does that show you? There's only
a few reasons that make that make sense.
Ali Abunemah from Electronic Intifada says we can
never underestimate the depravity and cruelty of this
evil enemy. But the big talk right now
from the prime minister of genocide is to
try to disguise the scale of his failure.
Israel's right to resume fighting in the 2nd
phase of the deal. New forceful ways.
Right. So, again, the promise as for many
different statements in slightly different ways is that
the second part of the deal is where
they're going to break it.
Here is Mary, Maryav, Zonzine from 972 or
excuse me. I keep doing that. I think
she switched to Crisis Group.
Point is, she's a writer. She covered a
lot of these different things from a very
objective standpoint, and she's an Israeli reporter. She
just spoke with CNN about the in pen
the impending ceasefire between Israel and Hamas,
why it's so important, why it leaves out
a political horizon for both Israel's and Israelis
and Palestinians, and why Netanyahu will do everything
he can to derail it. See? They know,
guys. And the point is, you know, why
it leaves out everything for both Israelis and
Palestinians? Because they never had any intention to
stop this. That's what I think.
Now, of course, what you're gonna see from
a lot of these propagandists out there is
trying to get you to be up reactionary,
emotional, and they keep using the Beavis children,
which makes me sick.
She says, Gaza terrorists are demanding 30 convicted
prisoners to free this baby. That's all they
all that's the only thing they go to.
Or Elon Levy acting like they're making us
try these for our babies. You mean baby
e. Right? Or the one the idea that
they keep trying to act like everything over
there is a bunch of children and women
and innocence. No. It's the vast majority of
IDF members and soldiers, and this was a
crime.
Without question, guys, they took this child.
That's a crime. They need to be held
accountable for that. But that does not invalidate
all the other realities or change others to
hostages even though they're obvious to teenagers or
POWs as active IDF members. Or all the
women they claim are innocent women. No. Those
were IDF members. They were active. They were
in those towers.
My point with this, if you don't remember,
is just like all the other examples we
got of people that were in captivity with
them that reported certain things that then came
out to back them up to this day
and continue to tell you what they said
then?
Well, here's a guy we haven't seen. He
hasn't been released. This is the Beba's father.
And what he says in this video is
that and he's crying. It's sad. Is that
those children were killed by IDF bombs. And
that's that's a very consistent report we've got
from hostages, or rather, detainees,
or from other reports.
It's the same thing whether it's Hannibal directive
or not or just belligerence.
Their bombs have killed, provably,
hostages there. I mean, how could they have
not? I mean, just look at this picture,
guys.
Or how how did I miss that? There
it is. Look at this picture. And honestly,
I don't even think that's I've seen ones
that were for I think they leave out
the smaller speckled dots in the other areas
because I'm pretty sure they bombed almost everywhere
in Gaza. But look at that. They say
92%
of areas are damage destroyed.
How do you think they're gonna miss?
Like, they don't know where they are. That's
been pretty clearly shown. I think they don't
care or they're trying to kill them.
My point though is they they he reported
that they did. Now you could argue he
was forced to say that, but consistently so
far that hasn't been the case.
But we'll we'll find out. I simply say
they keep using them even though their father
already, months ago, reported they had been killed
by IDF bombs. Alright? They and they know
this, guys. They know he said that is
the point. And it says, and yet you
still use them. Incessantly.
Even the mainstream media was forced to acknowledge
this as Dan Cohen covered. In the reporting
of the Biebless family, even CBS was forced
to acknowledge that they were killed by Israeli
airstrikes.
And still, they can't it it makes my
skin crawl
that this kind of person exists in the
world, and they know what they're doing.
So here, as they're doing that, is what
they don't care about. So if you didn't
hear it already, by the way, there was
a whole bunch of people that were celebrating
a ceasefire that Israel decided to bomb because
and this was stated by the IDF soldiers
because they were celebrating a ceasefire.
Khaleesi simply goes, here's one that was celebrating
a ceasefire.
It's a child.
Bombed. Which by the way, is not unique
to this conversation. But it's disgusting as they
keep talking about everything else when these children
are simply out there going, thank god, there's
gonna be a ceasefire. And then they bomb
them for being happy about that. That's the
kind of vindictive,
sociopathic,
psychopathic
monsters we're dealing with.
Diane Buti points something out to understand the
difference between the dynamics. When they keep talking
about no equivalence, here's what the reality of
that is. Israel just released a list of
95 Palestinian prisoners who may be released apparently
coming days, but some of them tomorrow.
6 of them are kids.
None of them convicted.
4 held without charge or trial.
79 of them who have not been convicted
of a crime, including 27
being held without charge or trial.
No. So it's
clear, there's 6 children and 4 of those
children are held without charge. We we there
was a kid that was released 20 years,
20,
during this time frame. He was in prison
for 20 years.
Had never been charged with a crime.
That means you probably threw a stone, guys.
That's the kind of stuff they would charge
them if they had to I mean, they
charge people without crimes, guys. Understand. There are
people that are being held because they just
hold them forever.
It's sickening.
And then the point is that there's 79,
just the entire grouping that aren't just children,
who have not been convicted of anything.
27 with no charge at all.
And these people can be held as administrative
detention
for years.
I mean, how in the world do we
pretend that's not the most obvious example? We
do we all know it. I'm just tired
of pretending like we're even debating anything other
than Zionist propaganda and politicians that are bought
out to do so.
Mass incarceration is an Israeli tool of control,
as he writes or she writes. And this
has been reported by literally every major human
rights group for years.
But let's keep pretending that Matt Miller knows
better.
And, of course, the point is when we're
talking about the tran the the the people
they're gonna exchange. Right? They were talking about
mostly IDF members, people that were also killing
children. And then on top of that, not
every single one of them, but could be.
On the other side of that, we got
actual children, actual people that have never been
charged with a crime. And you got idiots
like Ben Shapiro screaming that they're all provable
terrorists because he is a compromised manipulator,
At least in this conversation. And here is
Haraz.
At the air and the hot base, Gaza
detainees
are held
blindfelled blindfolded.
Handcuffed for weeks.
Not criminals. Right? Just detained. Most of which
they take from hospitals because they say they're
Palestinian terrorists. Turns out most of them get
released. But while they're there, whether or not
charged, and maybe they're for years because they
just decide to,
blindfolded, handcuffed, weeks.
At one of them, they don't get changed
of clothes for
months. At, of course, Sid Tiamen, which they
got raped but they're raping soldiers or rather
soldiers are raping inmates, which has been proven.
They're interrogating and deafening music accompanied by beatings.
You realize, you have people that are there
without charge.
And this is the leading Israeli platform making
sure you understand that.
You see the equivalence?
Linda Ramon points out a 15 year old
Palestinian boy
said he was raped in Israeli custody.
When a nonprofit tried to expose that,
Israel raided their offices,
labeled them a terrorist organization, and shut them
down.
Brett Murphy's ProPublica report reveals this and more.
Now, you know why you that sounds familiar?
Be this is just the article reporting the
facts around the story that the state department
guy you've heard say that cited when he
resigned in protest.
I just wanted to include that because we've
talked about that many times. This is actually
just the article
that has the the details.
And it really is incredible to think about
this. It's exactly what it sounds like. A
child got raped, which is a really common
story that's covered by even Israeli media, in
their prisons. And some of them I mean,
it's horrifying. And
And instead of doing anything about it, when
it got exposed, they went after them. We
have to condemn the atrocities that happen every
day to Palestinians in the West Bank. You
mentioned sexual violence.
I was part of the human rights vetting
process for arms going to Israel,
and a charity called Defense of Children International
Palestine,
drew our attention at the state department to
the sexual assault, actually the rape of a
13 year old boy that occurred in an
Israeli prison in the Muscabia in Jerusalem.
We examined these allegations.
We believe they were credible. We put them
to Israel to, the government of Israel. And
you know what happened the next day?
The IDF went into the DCIP offices and
removed all their computers and declared them a
terrorist entity.
I think it is vital that atrocities not
happen to anyone, not sexual atrocities, not sexual
violations, not any kind of gross violation of
human rights. We are looking at a situation
where there is so much dehumidification,
where people are not seen.
So think about think about having this conversation.
Like, this is before October 7th. Right? So
all the rape that was reported on amnesty
and human rights watch and things like that
ignored. No outrage. No cries for fraud. But
then when narratives get spun that we now
know are absolutely faked,
everybody leans in. Now how do you miss
what that shows you?
It's there's control right there, guys.
And as Aaron Mate points out in regard
to Biden discussing this, I was as I
was saying before,
In a chat with loyal stenographer,
Lawrence,
Lawrence O'Donnell,
president Biden recounts how Netanyahu told him of
his intent to indiscriminately
bomb the Gaza Strip.
I mean, this is my point. So, yeah,
we all know this, but now he's just
kinda casually reporting what he
how is people not in prison when they
can sit there on mainstream TV and tell
you that we knew he was gonna commit
genocide and then armed him the entire time?
Biden says Netanyahu made the legitimate argument, argument
that Israel had no choice in order to
take out the bad guys hiding in tunnels.
So Biden gave him all the bombs he
wanted and repeatedly blocked the ceasefire. In a
just world, Lawrence O'Donnell's fawning interview could actually
do some so some social good as evidence
in a war crimes tribunal.
When I went to Israel
immediately after their attack
on they went by Hamas,
just 8 days later, whatever it was,
and, I told them we were gonna help.
I said, but, Bebe,
I said, you can't be carpet bombing
these communities.
Which shows you right out of the gate,
he knows exactly who he's dealing with. A
mass murderer
and they always have.
And he said to me, well, you did
it.
You see how normal that is?
How constantly they're talking about, well, you didn't
care about this. So this isn't so our
genocides okay if that one was okay. But
then acting like we're not committing genocide
though. But you just literally made an argument
that made the case that your genocide was
okay.
I don't know how this ever even came
to pass. It's actually crazy. I told him
we were gonna help.
I said, but, Bibi,
I said, you can't be carpet bombing these
And he said to me, well, you did
it.
You carpet bombed not his exact words, but
you carpet bombed Berlin.
You dropped a nuclear weapon.
You killed thousands of innocent people
because you had to in order to win
a war.
But that's not true. Don't forget. They were
already retreating when they did that. That's a
public fact at this point. They bombed just
to see what they would do. Basically, as
a threat to Russia, I would argue but
also just as
a experiment and killed tons of civilians even
though they knew they didn't have to. That's
take your time to look that up. It's
important.
Sorry about that. I hit the wrong button.
Came up with the UN.
New mess new deals by which how what
we how what we do relative to civilians
and military.
So he was comparing
21st century war tactics, battle tactics
with World War 2. Well, what he was
really doing is he was going after me
for saying you can't
indiscriminately
bomb civilian areas.
Even if the bad guys are there.
Even if the bad guys are there, you
can't take out
2, 10, 12, 1500 people, innocent people. I
mean, how can you sit there and say
that while you then literally knew that and
let him do it? Because that's what happened.
In order to get the one bad guy.
And he made a legitimate argument. His perspective,
look. These are the guys that kill my
people. These are the guys that are all
over in these tunnels.
Nobody had any idea the the miles of
tunnels are down there.
Super big. See what they Nobody thought planes
are flying into buildings.
God, they're so lazy with their propaganda.
And they're sometimes 200 feet under the ground.
Only way to get to them is take
out the places where they were under in
which under which they What absurd area. To
the tunnels. Even chief who was proven to
lie. So that's the first time I had
first time I had the discussion about
bombing
civilian areas
was,
when I went over after the 9 11
after the,
the the massacre that occurred. So on that
first trip, 10, 11 days after October 7th,
you already raised I raised. The issues of
how to get to a ceasefire?
Well, not a ceasefire.
How to prevent Mhmm. Innocent death. Yes. And
then I pushed really, really hard
for more humanitarian aid to go in. Guys,
such a disgusting liar.
I mean, he basically just admitted that he
knew he was gonna commit genocide and then
lied about everything else. No, you did not
do that. You guys actively helped them suppress
aid. You armed him anyway. It's just horrifying
how clear this is and this is what
they're going back to. This is a point
that I think is so important in all
of this.
Once the ceasefire goes into effect on Sunday,
Linda Mauman points out, 1,000,000 in Gaza will
try to return to their homes.
This is what they'll find.
It says 50 point let me turn this
down.
50,800,000
metric tons of rubble
littered with unexploded ordnance,
toxic waste, and asbestos.
Evil on a dystopian scale. This was not
by accident. Mean, not alone, like, the they're
using white phosphorus on areas that might be
used for farming. They're may they're literally tearing
up the roads with tractors designed to do
so. Massive bombing. And think about that. And
this is not, like, just what didn't explode.
I argue they're leaving behind explosives,
which by the way we already proven that.
Leaving behind those little cans that look like
cans of tuna so children pick them up
and blow themselves up. It's already been proven.
They even made for immediate an article about
it. These are the most sinister, sadistic people
I've ever experienced in my life. That's not
every Israeli or every every Jewish person. Not
even remotely. But it is clearly a Zionist
Israeli government thing.
We I don't know how anybody could die
of that anymore. So what are they supposed
to go back to? Right? I mean, think
about it, guys. You're gonna let them all
go back. And then as I just showed
you in the ridiculous deal, I mean, what
is that gonna amount to? You're gonna let
them all flood back into Gaza, and what's
that? 40 days before phase 2 starts? And
what are they gonna do? What are they
gonna eat? What are they gonna drink? Even
if you flood it with aid, the roads
are torn up. I I mean, the only
thing that's gonna happen is they're gonna collect
in an area that's probably out in the
outskirts or outer area close to the food,
so they're not really gonna populate Gaza again
because they can't. And they know that. There's
nowhere for them to go. Some of them
will. But then how are they gonna maintain
their survival?
And on top of that, once they are
back and filtered around Gaza, they're gonna break
the deal for some narrative and then be
able to bomb them all back in the
same thing. It's already happened more than once.
It just makes me sad. I so
wholeheartedly
hope that does not happen.
But this is where we are. 92% gone.
Entire neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, leaving
1,900,000
people displaced.
That's not just because they're currently out of
their homes. It's because they're gone, guys. For
the what? For some of them, for probably
the 4th time.
It's disgusting.
Well, to wrap up at the end here,
guys.
They've lost control of this a long time
ago, but apparently, that doesn't mean enough in
this world today.
Apparently, the elitists are showing us that they
really do have enough control to ignore what
we all see unless we're willing to kick
their doors down. Right? But that's not, I
think, the path to take this forward because
that will give them the excuse to do
what they wanna do anyway. So we genuinely,
as a as the human species, need to
sit back and think about how we could
take this step forward and change this. Because
I think at the end of the day,
everybody sees this. This is an Israeli lawyer
now accusing Israel genocide at the ICC.
Israeli lawyer, Omar Schatz, has accused 8 different
officials including Herzog and Netanyahu
of incitement to genocide against Palestinians in a
submission to the ICC.
Mick Wallace highlighting what Sarah Abdallah highlighted is
that right on 16th anyway, like, during this
process, they were bombing
entire apartment buildings full of people in Lebanon.
It's bear barely getting any attention.
Mick Wallace says Israel is a terrorist state.
Any country that respects international law should do
not do business with Israel.
Entire apartment buildings in southern Lebanon in the
middle of the night,
despite a ceasefire, mind you.
No reason, no justification, just pure terror destruction,
a war crime. And of course, not a
peep from the international community.
Just so you miss not missing the point,
it was full of people, guys. A in
the middle of the night.
I just don't even know how this continues.
Patrick points out,
blinking.
He says, remember how badly Kissinger was hounded
at every public appearance for decades Well, you
can expect Gaza genocide mastermind, Blinken, which I
have a different opinion about it. We'll never
know a day's peace in public without some
massive security bubble and handpicked friendlies wherever he
goes. I hope so. I hope he never
feels comfortable again. Anthony Blinken's position in history
as a derided derided
antagonist and a war criminal is now permanent.
He's already regarded by 1,000,000 as you of
youth as the Eichmann of our time. Now
in no he he is a villain, guys.
He's a very much a part of this.
I just don't think he's the I think
what this is designed to do is make
him the scapegoat.
Even though he is accountable and is responsible,
make it end up where he was the
one and kind of sidestep the other. This
is how this tends to work. Nonetheless,
I hope he gets what he deserves. But
I hope we don't stop there.
Listen. You must be remembered as the butcher
of Festa.
I was saying, keep this republic of China.
War criminal.
He is a war criminal. Families, these,
hostages many, many times,
and it's important that you point out that
among the hostages are American citizens, that my
first obligation
is to our our pope. Butcher of Gaza.
Intensifying strategic
competition in the Indo Pacific and around the
world. For a Lazarus. We
We will have to order. People will never
let you forget.
Secretary Blinken, you will be known as the
Butcher of Augusta.
You're a fraud of war criminals. Your legacy
will be genocide. You will
forever.
How does it feel to have your legacy
be genocide?
How does it feel to have your legacy
be genocide?
Criminal, why are you in the Hague? Why
are you in the Hague? Why are you
in the Hague? Why are you
See, full circle.
Right? Ending with the point.
Clearly,
everybody sees this. Right? And the point is
that clearly blinking is I mean, I you
can see it on his face.
It's it's it's problematic.
I mean and and I the point is
I still do think that he's kind of
being the one that's, you know, I like,
Biden, Trump, and the rest of them deserve
just as much accountability. But clearly, Blinken is
responsible.
And I hope that falls in for the
rest of his life. In fact, I hope
he goes to prison like the rest of
them. But I you know, historically, I find
that hard to believe. But I hopefully, we
can fight for that change. But to end
with a point about what we can see
that they have allowed,
that they are a part of. As Abeer
points out, the 0 year list
seems endless.
These are the names of Palestinian children
killed by Israel.
Have you I I hope you can sit
down and and watch this
and let this roll.
Especially, if you don't believe in what's going
on or realize, you know what? Don't feel
like this picture is what it is painted
as.
And then, I think those kind of people
probably just disregard this anyway. But I think
it's important to see, you know, what again,
we almost whatever your opinion, all these children
have died.
That has to be enough reason for you
to justify the end of what's happening here.
And hopefully, hold some people accountable for what's
going on. And you can stick a step
back and clearly prove,
undeniably,
that these people were killed by indiscriminate bombing
of Israel.
So I'll leave it here on the end.
Just I mean, if you watch this, guys,
it's sickening. It's day it's by age,
and it starts with 0. And it seems
to go on forever. And, you know, these
are all children. But there I think the
point this, guys, that right now,
the chain it's it's
whatever it is that needs to kick this
in, like, some, you know, one more
moment of what kick this over the edge.
I don't know what that is.
But we're at a point where it's just
like, we have with even, like, with the
COVID point, like, there's a lot so much
awareness around this topic. And I've talked I
I fall up against this all the time,
and I just don't you know, what is
it that we need to do to to
see this change?
And I I argue back to that point
about, like, opportunism or whatever else, like, giving
these people the rat the seeing that the
the vast majority people like, the point was,
like, with Trump and the rest of it
is that if they recognize that you're still
gonna always fall back into the paradigm or
choose lesser evils, that's it always comes back
to that. That they know they don't really
need to care. But
if we make it clear that we will
not lean in to people unless they
have moral standing or whatever else it is
that matters to you, then maybe we can
make this shift. But, you know, maybe I'm
being naive.
All I ask is that we think about
how we can make something different happen instead
of falling through the same old motions. And
And I know most of you out there
are seeing it. That was one of the
most of the points of today.
I know you see it. Left and right,
we see it. We're uncomfortable.
Let's do something about it. Thank you for
tuning in. I love you all. As always,
question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.