Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Wednesday, January 15, 2025. Thank you for joining
me today. Important developments.
Definitely some positives really no matter how you
spin it, at least at the moment in
regard to the ongoing ceasefire conversation from Israel,
but definitely
some concerns that I have that I'm sure
you'd expect. So we're gonna go through this
conversation today and kind of as we have
been,
as the evolution. You know, making sure we
continue to highlight, though, the entire time this
has been going on, Netanyahu and now clearly
Ben Gavir, who just basically
outed himself in a big statement,
have deliberately been stalling these agreements, if not
sabotaging them. That's that's objective truth even from
Netanyahu and Beyenne Gavir themselves, and yet is
still denied in the conversation, or blocking humanitarian
aid.
Now the deal is
going forward, it appears, but I'm gonna show
some caveats right out of the gate that
seemed to be just like before. And, also,
some reporting coming out from Israeli media, both
Ynet and Heretz,
pretty much stating that this is a a
ruse, that Netanyahu and Trump have an agreement
that ultimately Netanyahu is saying that he's not
planning on following through with the second phase.
And, you know, and but I'm not gonna
jump to conclusions.
I mean, just the fact that this is
being forced to the phase it is now
is still a positive step. And I think
at some level here, you definitely have to
give Trump credit for what is happening. And
that's not that shouldn't be like a grudging
thing. If he deserves credit, he should get
credit. But the reason I even frame it
sort of hesitantly is because I'm
you know my opinion on these people, and
it's not unique to Trump or Biden or
left or right. But the idea being that
I see
a lot of inconsistencies
on why this makes sense, that doesn't have
to mean that it's not what it looks
like. It could just be that Trump has
taken a win from this that he desperately
needs at the expense of somebody who's also
his ally. That's how I would read that
if that's the way it played out.
But I don't I get the sense that
might not be the way it goes. And
so I'm just being cautious as as we
go forward as always wait for the action,
not the words. The action, the follow through,
the outcome is what matters. Even if they
mean the words they say, it could often
change by a, you know, a 1000000 different
factors.
But I'm just very concerned that this is
more about trying to like, I guess my
my ladder of concern we'll get into, or
not ladder, but I guess deeper concern,
is the worry that this is sort of
a coordinated play. And I I mean, I
I'll get into all this, but just such
a it's something I want to make sure
you don't miss if you don't tune in
later.
Let's not forget that Gaza is destroyed.
I mean, it's gone, guys. It is a
flattened, broken area. And the people have been
shuffled around so many times. I don't even
know how these people will can help be
capable of continue on continuing on a normal
life if they even had that land to
go back to.
But they've shown themselves to be wildly resilient,
the Palestinian people. So I have no doubt
they will find their path forward if that's
allowed.
But think about where that's at right now,
and think about how even if they actually
have some kind of an agreement, what does
that look like?
What I mean, even if we were like,
we're gonna rebuild everything. I so I knew
I was gonna jump into the whole conversation,
but
if they're gonna rebuild everything and all the
conversations, is that gonna be tomorrow? What are
they gonna eat?
The aid that comes in, where are they
gonna live? How are they gonna get drinking
water? Like, everything's gonna you know, it doesn't
make any logistical sense. So I'll leave that
there. We're gonna get into this. That's gonna
be one of the main focuses of today
that I'm I'm you know, positive.
Any any positive step that goes forward, even
if there's a brief pause to the murder
that's been going on at the behest of
the US government and is and Israel, that's
both sides of your government,
that would still be a positive, but I
would still give Trump credit for that even
if he has another agenda behind it. Now
we're also gonna talk about
a, I guess, really an extension of the
last show as I titled the fake globalist
resistance ushering in the globalist plan. Now these
definitely come together today. Now it's really the
main two things we're talking about. That topic
and the ongoing evolution of, like, right now,
we have people in front of congress. Pam
Bondi, for example, will make some points about
that as well as pretty much everybody in
his administration.
And the seeming well, I shouldn't say seemingly,
the lack of the absence
of ethics pleasures
for Trump and many of his team.
I don't know why that's not a huge
story, and I think it's a huge the
silence is deafening moment for why the Democrats
aren't calling that out. Maybe because they're all
on the same damn side. Not maybe all
in their minds in every ways, but when
it really comes down to it. Or maybe
when somebody taps them above and says don't
talk about that. Or we're all crazy conspiracy
theorists, but at the end of the day,
why is this not being discussed? Some people
are pointing to it, and I'll go into
that again as well. Because it's very important
to the overlap of these two conversations.
The concern about the people being brought in,
the concern about who they really support and
why they're not the people that were promised
and all the other things, and then
what don't we know about them? What's being
hidden behind these not signed ethics pledges, maybe
conflicts of interest, potentially connections to foreign governments,
and how that plays into the larger conversation
about what's going on with Israel.
And, you know, Pete Hegseth and these, like,
rapid foam foaming at the mouth prophetic Zionists
that are telling you they're gonna be America
first.
It's concerning. And I'm I mean, you guys
conservatives are calling this out. So it's important
that we break this down in an objective
way and avoid all the emotional partisan nonsense.
But even pulling it all aside, there's a
problem here.
I mean, let's just again, like I've said
last time, let's just make it about China.
If that makes you somehow make this matter
more, it shouldn't really matter. I mean, it
does in a lot of context, but at
the end of the day, at the main
point, it shouldn't matter whether it's Israel or
China or Russia. We should be going, why
do we have or why are we concerned
about foreign government influence in this administration when
it's transparently obvious?
Or the ethics pledges that we don't see,
what's behind those? Now, we'll go through all
that as well, but the main two points
there and how this all comes together in
a way that is,
like, I the way I mean, a lot
of people are highlighting the kind of fruition
of a long term agenda that is not
unique to partisanship.
And that kind of hard pill to swallow,
sadly, a lot of I I do think
a lot of honest conservatives that
are being swayed,
that see problems, that are concerned about things,
that don't like what they're seeing, but still
end up going, well, it's better than what
we could have, kind of a thing. And
ultimately end up kind of getting pulled through
this when the truth is that
everything right now does not add up. And
you guys feel it. You're calling it out,
but I think it's about not knowing where
else to go. I hope I'm right. I
mean, I see that. I talk to a
lot of people on a lot of different
ways and people that disagree with me. I
mean, just so you guys know, I've got
people I reach out to that that it's
they're all people that have we can have
amicable disagreements because I don't know how else
you would ever do that. But there's a
lot of people that I keep in touch
with that I reach out and go, hey.
You know? I know you disagree. I know
you think Trump's gonna save the world, but,
like, you know, what do you think about
this and how do you read that? And
and we share ideas, and that's that's I
have a lot there's a lot of ways
you could cap into these things. Now that's
that's my view and I also always see
online. But, you know, tell me if you
think I'm wrong. I mean, I've been saying
that quite frequently over the last couple of,
like, months even. I mean, I I don't
even I mean, it's quite transparent. There's people
all over Twitter and Gab and everywhere else
that are conservative as they're going, what the
f is going on? But in case you
think I'm missing something, let me know if
this is my, you know, missing the forest
for the trees. But I do believe, quite
frankly, that most people, partisan or not, are
very aware that there's a problem. And we
need to start kind of marshaling that together.
Otherwise, we're gonna be scattered.
Divided amongst different things or, you know, we'll
get partisan points that come up. Like, right
now, that's I guess this comment on the
third point for today, which has been an
ongoing point,
is using things that we want.
And sometimes action, like a deal, for example,
if that's how that works, or just going,
we're gonna do this, and everybody goes, yay.
See? We knew it. Of course, when that
changes, they go, well, don't jump to conclusions.
We don't know yet. You know? But when
they say the one thing, it's like, hooray.
But that's happening a lot. And, like, for
example, we'll get to it. Rubio coming up
and going, we're gonna end Ukraine war right
away. It's like, well, You guys have already
passed that moment. But I think right now,
they're recognizing they're not getting enough following, that
the people that need to support them are
confused and uncertain. And so they come out
and they yell things, UK Pedo Gangs, and
everyone goes, Oh, it's rally behind the thing,
or Democrats planning this or that, which either
of those could be true. But why are
you letting that distract you from things that
are obviously problematic?
So let's start today with this article. Again,
the reference to the show we just did.
The fake globalist resistance ushering in the globalist
plan. Now that doesn't have to mean that
they're aware of that. Right? Like, for me,
that doesn't mean that everybody involved in that
resistance is aware that they're in a fake
resistance. Typically, that's never the case or rarely
the case, I should say.
Usually, these movements that actually start, you know,
at least beginning to concern the power structure,
well, they execute the normal plan where they
infiltrate and control. That's how this works. It's
a classic tactic. It goes back a long
way. Israel is showing you that today.
So recognize that a lot of people seem,
know, in my opinion, are following along with
what they think is the right thing, but
are being played by people that have no
intention of actually fighting it. And meanwhile, while
they know you're distracted, rolling out the exact
plan that you think you're fighting.
Now interestingly, on just a censorship point, Aurelie,
I do think this is censorship,
at least
suppression, which are you know, it's like freedom
of reach, freedom of speech. It's all the
same category.
Here is the tweet I put out about
this show with no hashtags. I mean, it's
got more reach, like, double almost than the
one that does have hashtags. And I find
that almost impossible other than what and then
look at that. And the image goes away.
Weird.
That's not by accident, guys. I mean, there's
clear this is just perfect timing, isn't it?
If you look for the podcast as we
were looking at it, the metadata image had
disappeared which is not, you know, it's like
with Bitchute and the rest where they just
don't even show you the the drop down
metadata, it just shows you the link. Like,
these are all actions and he's owned that
about Substack and Bitchute. But, you know, a
lot of this stuff doesn't get discussed. So
what I want you to think about, the
reason that hashtags were originally important or still
are or designed, I mean, I'll show you
right now. Click on BlackRock. And you guys
all know this, I'm not teaching you anything
new. The point is that you go, oh,
look, here's what everybody else whether it was
BlackRock just in the words or hashtags. So
if you wanna hashtag something, it's like, okay,
I want the I want other people searching
around BlackRock to be able to see this
in there. That's assuming it doesn't get, you
know, manipulated, censored, suppressed, controlled, which we know
it is. But the point
is that that's a really important way for
us to be able to communicate, connect, and
crossover conversations
as opposed to them channeling you into very
specific partisan tunnel vision
without you knowing that.
Now that's whether that's there's the general concept.
Right? So ask yourself why he would not
just go, you know, that hurts.
People don't like it. It's in the way.
It looks bad. Whatever.
I'm asking you to stop doing it. No.
That's fine. But that's not what they're doing.
They're actively suppressing people that use hashtags. They've
made that very clear. Now you have to
really ask, why would that make sense? Why
would you need to choose to suppress it?
Which is straight up suppression and censorship.
And, other than trying to control the flow
of information.
Because you know that is a cons that
is a a useful tool. Now, I mean,
you could search for words in the same
way, but this is about something that specifically
makes it stand out and control and searchable.
But I'll leave it there. And I do
think it's important to see why the image
goes away, why it gets less reach because
it's being suppressed in that way. And am
I also because I wanna show one thing
and then do a few hashtags where it
connects to other conversations
as opposed to just writing out this
headline and then writing out BlackRock reset Israel,
like words which would be super confusing for
everybody. The point is they're trying to make
that happen, and I think we need to
be honest about that. You may think that's
okay.
I don't know why you would. Because it's
done to everybody.
Now, on the note of a the the,
fire conversation really quickly, I just wanted to
make,
2 points that I thought were interesting.
Now this one is fascinating because this is
an old headline. Matt Orfel shared this. This
goes back about 25 years,
but super relevant. And I wanna be it's
very clear,
not even remotely unique
to CNN. It's a corporate media dynamic that
cross and quite frankly, today, a mainstream alternative
media tactic that I think we're very aware
of. But he simply says the the title
from 2 the year 2000, why were government
propaganda experts working on CNN
working on news at CNN? Well, we I
think we all know the answer to that.
The point is not necessarily about why they
were doing it. But that he noticed, guess
what? They were from Fort Bragg.
Well, so it says several officers from the
US Army's 4th psychological operations division, like the
videos we keep seeing, by the way.
Right? They're showing you that we're manipulating everyone's
minds, and we're not supposed to be weird
about by that. And they all come from
Fort Bragg, at least in the context of
CNN, where they work from. So let's be
clear about the connection he's making to what
just happened in regard to the Cybertruck.
So Las Vegas and,
it's more like any other city.
New Orleans.
Both cyber both electric vehicles, both from Fort
Bragg, both military. I mean, it really does
I mean, that just to be clear, like,
we're always talking about, that does not prove
that they're interconnected.
But it's a hell of a lot of
evidence points to be able to ignore, and
it would be really dumb to say they
couldn't be. But until you have the provable
connection, some like, a a a a email
back and forth, like, let's get ready. Or
the, you know, the same leadership that sends
them both instructions. Like, that's proof. Right? That's
always it's a it's a layer that seems
to be so lost in the partisan field
today. But nonetheless, the point is that's a
huge connection that has to be relevant and
even more so when you stand back and
see things like that.
I think that's important to think about. That
it's media
constantly as well as real world events, guys.
And that with I think the bigger picture
here is that
there's really nothing, in my opinion, that is
outside the possibility for what your government would
try to do to convince you of something
that they need to do or to convince
you to agree to something that they wanna
accomplish
or to make you ignore something.
Nothing.
From murder
to ever I mean, guys, literally nothing. And
I I you may disagree with that. But
if you have any any if you're a
student of history at all, just from American
history,
it's a it's like
sprinkled, like, say, head across this it's everywhere.
I mean, it really is. And you guys
know that they're paying attention. Now lastly on
the fire point, I wanted to really point
this out again because it's so spectacular.
It's so it's just this ridiculous this is
so constant right now. And still, by the
way, it is still getting more reach with
both my mind. So it's got 1,700,000
views on this on this,
tweet.
This guy's name is hustle, b I t
c h. It's got 83,000
followers. 83,000, but it's got 1,700,000
views. That's pretty ridiculous. And let's be if
you go back and look through people like
this that are tapping into the kind of
partisan, Elon supported circle narratives,
they get 90, 80,000, 50,000, a 100,000, yet
they get millions of views. That's not normal
ratio. Okay? They're being propped up.
Yet maybe one of them you could say,
well, it just went viral. But, no, they're
consistently doing this. That's interesting. And then eventually,
their numbers will grow because they're being tapped
and, you know, that's how this works. But
my point is,
very consistently within that circle, they're sharing outright
provably false information that even gets fact checked
by Twitter. And it's not just because it
said that. You can look for yourself. And
you know what's even stupider? I this was
on the video we're the show we just
did.
Basically saying, there's a lithium plant discovered,
and there it is. Maui 2.0.
Another land grab. That's what he says.
In the video itself, the guy literally says
they found a battery location.
Lithium battery location. That's all he says. And
this guy either didn't care to even listen
properly, just lurched over the top and said,
oh, we did it. Oh, we do it.
Oh, we do it. Oh, or
heard it and just didn't care and decided
to misinform you. Either way, it got almost
2,000,000 views, and it's has influenced the conversation.
And this has been propped and pointed to
and shared by plenty of large Republican accounts,
including people in the Elon circle, possibly even
himself. If you wanna search, I didn't find
it.
Stop socialist tyranny says this is a classic
example of the elites trying to control the
narrative. Now I'm not really sure how the
way he reads this because I feel like
he's trying to call it like what we're
talking about. But he goes on to say,
lithium plant discovered in LA, and they're already
spinning it as land grab. Now the point
is I don't know whether he saw that
this fact check that says the video from
the official fire official clearly states it's not
a lithium mine, but an underground lithium bicycle
battery storage facility.
Literally couldn't be for I mean, outside of
it being lithium batteries, it's like night and
day.
So the point is that he maybe didn't
see that, but they're saying lithium plant already
spinning in his land grab. I think what
he's doing is criticizing this guy before he
even saw the fact check. That also, just
because there was a lithium plant also wouldn't
mean that we know for sure it's a
land grab. But that's the kind of lack
like, you're skipping, like, 45 steps in the
investigation process. You're just jumping to assumption.
That's what they do in partisan fields.
This is wake up, folks. This is about
power and control, not about serving the people.
The fact that they're trying to hide this
from us should be a red flag. It's
time to take a stand and demand transparency.
We can't let them continue to manipulate us
with lies about deceit. So even it's hard.
I mean, I get the sense he's talking
about this guy,
but you can read it either way. Or
he's taking the bait and thinking it's a
it's a I mean, either way, the bottom
line is this is false information. And he's
screaming about it, and you can look and
it continues even though they've already been told
it's not. And the video itself says it's
not.
But the reason this is important, guys, is
because there are land grabs. There are very
clearly, like, for example,
lithium in Venezuela. And Elon Musk's kind of
desperate effort, it seems to be focused on
that. But it's plenty of other things in
in Venezuela or maybe that's not what he
was about despite his will coo whoever we
want
tweet after that was asked.
But just think about how important that is
because these are real things that can happen,
and yet you get fake information like this
that's scattered across the top of it and
people ignore it. You know, the Alex Jones
effect as I've come to call it. Whether
true or not, people disregard it, which is
their fault for ignoring a fact or not
doing their due diligence to find out whether
it is or not. But nonetheless, these people
are everywhere and these are the ones that
are being propped up by the people I
can't stop seeing this as designed.
That you guys I mean, I shouldn't say
not even remotely the majority, but specific people
in the conservative slash team sport politics side
that are just rushing to try to get
to the top as fast as possible without
any regard for the truth.
It's like you're falling for the bait. Like,
they told you you would do this when
he took over, and so he's pied pipering
you right into what he they said you
would become. And I don't I mean, it's
just it's kind of obvious, but I'll leave
that there because I'm gonna go into a
larger point about this whole thing, about the
fake global resistance, about the kind of illusion
of the coming administration.
Just a thought made a really good point.
And I know most people are able to
go, yes. This absolutely makes sense,
But some of those group, maybe half of
that group, will
not consider that when it overlaps with their
chosen side. And that's kind of the point
she's making here. That's happening a lot. It's
not unique to left or right. It's straight
up partisanship.
And she says, I beg you to, at
the very least,
entertain the idea that propaganda does not just
come from your TV.
It does not just come from people who
you aren't politically or ideologically aligned with, as
in, like, the only democrats or only republicans.
It does not just come from politicians.
It does not always present as obvious. It
does not mean that certain topics can't be
addressed. It does not mean that there isn't
any truth mixed in. It does not often
feel like a manipulation.
And if you cannot at least entertain any
of this, then the propaganda has worked.
It's very well said. She's, by the way,
working on a second article on follow-up
and similar topics for TLF.
She wrote one a while back.
Just very well said. I mean, I it's
important. It's this is just anyone who could
disregard this is, is just,
like, it's just I don't even know how
to frame that. Like, this is objective truth.
Like, you're just simply saying this could be
possible. We know that's gonna be the case.
If it's a manipulation, it's not always gonna
look like one. I think just it rubs
against right now people just wanting to not
care about that as long as they feel
like they're winning.
Well said. This and now here's an interesting
kind of meme, or rather, I guess yeah.
Kind of a meme, but, like, an AI
version of Trump. And mister Sausage shared this.
And this is just an interestingly humorous point
to me because this is the kind of
ongoing contradiction you get from partisans.
One sign so Trump's holding 2 signs. The
ones the left says 5 d genius chess
master. Right? Because what's do we keep hearing?
4 d chess. Right? Anything that doesn't appear
to look like what you were told, it's
like, well, it's a long term play. You
you don't know. You're being trolled or whatever.
At the same exact time, the argument is
to make sense of anything that didn't go
the way they wanted it after 4 years,
and then the other the other cards says
victim of bad advisers. But they say for
8 years, I guess, they're predicting the way
this ends up. Either way, you can't really
argue that he got played for 4 years
by all of his advisors, but yet every
move that we called that at the time
was also long term for chess play. It's
just it's partisanship. They will ignore what they
want at the time.
Now this is just interesting to me, and
this goes into the same point about false
heroes.
Really, as I should probably show this one
first oh, wait. Was that,
did I actually close something? I'm pretty sure
I had a tweet that was open before
that.
I mean, I guess it might be kinda
this one. But anyway, the my my point
is that we're I think we're being presented
with false
you know, false heroes. People that are per
playing a role that aren't really what they
actually think and are. Yeah. I think Elon
Musk is a very, very obvious example of
that, in my opinion.
And the reason I wanna include this is
because this is one of a lot of
things that keep happening. The when you are
this focused on and this influential like, I
mean, let's be clear. Pretty sure he's, like,
the most influential person in the world.
The I mean, whether you believe he's the
richest person in the world, that's at least
what they're claiming. And that that that circles
the globe. Everyone talks about that. You get
the top of the lists and everything else.
On top of the fact that he is
king Twitter, and he's literally able to get
a 100, 200,000,000
views on anything he wants to. I mean,
that's that's a huge power to think about,
which is, I think, the leading platform in
regard to what people use.
And so what's interesting on that is a
lot of these things keep trickling out. They
get ignored by the ones that wanna support
him, the large ones that might get reach
on these things that need to get reach.
And this is one example of that, but
we've seen a lot of these. And I've
gone over them on this show. Different things
where he gets caught for basically pretending to
be something. And, you know, and that, by
the way, is not unique to Elon Musk,
guys. This is politics.
They have teams that go, here's how if
you say this or if you you jump
this way or you wear this shirt, people
will, you know, that's what they do.
That doesn't have to mean that there's not
also honest points in there too because there
are, I think.
I'd like to believe so. But in this
case,
this is a, it's just this is an
example that I think gets laughed at because
it's such a to the adults in the
room, it's like such a it's a kid
thing. Even though, by the way, video gaming
is no longer some child's game. It's, like,
clearly an adult thing for the world. But
the point is,
Elon Musk just got accused of hiring video
gamers to play
for him so he can pretend to be
good. Now the title in a way seems
petty when you read it. You're going, oh,
well, that's who cares? Right? With everything going
on.
But when you when you actually dig into
this, and especially if you play any of
these games and you understand what these people
are saying, and you actually watch even just
watch the video. I mean, these are these
are, like, professional gamers
that are going
100%. There is no way. So just to
get some context,
he play he pretends to play a game
called exile Path of Exile 2.
And many times now, he's done like, if
he did, like, a Starlink demonstration where he
was like, look. I'm streaming from space or
whatever it was and trying to and he
was playing this game publicly.
And that's one of the ways that this
got caught. And so he's playing it. Right?
So he's on the stream, he's talking about
it, and people are watching. And things like
this.
Where it show it turns out where he's
leaving very important things on the ground, or
he's got a a an inventory tab that's
for inventory things, but it's labeled Elon's map.
Well, that doesn't make any sense unless no
mistakes can happen. My point is if you
go through this, there's inconsistencies
that are simply just not the the gamers
will tell you. There's no way. If you
if he and, also, he represents himself as,
like, a knight you know,
master, like, level 92 master player, which the
point they make is that if you actually
played that much,
none of these things would be happening. Of
course, always possible that there's an answer. But
nonetheless, though, I believe this is what we're
dealing with. People that are literally trying to
present a certain persona
to get certain people to ignore certain things.
And it's working.
Not as well as they'd like, but for
a very certain group, it's working.
But this is just one example of how
I mean, I I recommend you watch the
video. It's only 3 minutes but I just
won't wanna take too much time on it.
Because these people are straight, like, they're they
these people know what they're doing And they're
simply telling you this guy is not playing
that. There's no way he's lying to you.
But it gets ignored because it's not a
major political topic. Right? But I want you
to consider what other things he may be
pretending to do. Maybe everything.
Now, point being is we'll get into in
a second, the idea of whether he's just
a front for groups like DARPA or, you
know, your government.
All of it. But here's something that just
came out. So he just tweaked this 14
hours ago, and it shows a
x, and at the end, it says the
Everything app,
which is not a secret, guys. It but
has been, like, a lot of the things
that are uncomfortably close to the great reset
overlap,
it was it was ignored and dis no.
No. No. You're lying. That's not what he
really meant. Or he just said it in
this one meeting and it kind of a
joke. Well, here we are. Right? So as
I said, as we said, he was making
a US WeChat.
Are you seeing it yet?
And here's the crazy thing, guys. This has
been out. And I even I have said,
if you remember. I said, well, he said
it in one meeting. It was filmed. It
went out kinda it was a kind of
a leak. But, nonetheless, he did say it,
and so we have to wait and see.
Right? And here's that moment. Here's the moment
where we go, now we can see. He
just literally said, yes. It's the everything app,
which is what WeChat is. That's what this
video shows. I've been working on an edit
button for a year. Well, it's a hard
it's tricky situation,
and it's incredibly complex.
Yeah. It's a good one. Indeed. I mean,
we don't even have,
a a a an app that's as good
as WeChat in China.
Like, in China, you, like, live on WeChat,
basically. Yeah.
It's like yeah. Everyone everyone's like, they're like,
you live on WeChat. You do payments. You
do everything. It's like Yep. It's great. Basically,
WeChat's kick ass. And we don't have anything
like WeChat outside of China. It's true. So
I was like, my dear would be like,
how about if we just copy WeChat?
Hey.
Copy
them.
Yep.
What's funny on a side note, like, I
I totally you tell me what you think.
I get the sense that guy in that
room probably doesn't work there anymore. Just the
way he did that, like, he he acts
like we're all just kinda joking here. No.
We're not. This is a $1,000,000,000 code. I
just think that's funny. But I think that's
super important. Right? I mean, you could argue
that it doesn't have to be nefarious. Right?
That's a fair point. It could just be
that he wants to do this because he
thinks it will help. But I think it's
important to recognize that that has been denied,
and now it's happening. And this is just
one element of people like us are highlighting,
not to say that it proves x y
z, but this is one continuous step after
another in the direction that everybody screeched was
never going to happen. That's important to me.
Now, on the, extension of that, and this
is far more up in the air. Now,
this even has been denied now by the
by China, apparently. Which is interesting because China
is not necessarily the group that's it's a
whole this whole thing is so muddied by
just US propaganda.
You know, whether the whether the Singapore owner
and, you know, and the China government and,
like, I mean, it's the same conversation you
can have about Twitter and the US government.
They love to act like it's not the
same thing, but they are I mean, literally,
the government runs Twitter now. Elon is literally
the government. But aside from that, it always
has. Or at least influence, invested control. I
mean, the same thing. So the point is
that they recently said this and it says
Chinese officials are evaluating the potential option that
involves Elon Musk acquiring TikTok. Now they've said,
no. It's fake news or whatever.
But if it happens,
I would find it to be very important.
Now a lot people reported it, whether it
was Bloomberg or or the standard. I mean,
it was pretty widely reported. Doesn't mean it's
true as we all know. But
it can.
Just because they deny it doesn't also doesn't
make it false either.
Think about what that would mean.
All this hype about TikTok and the
malicious algorithm, and they just go, now we're
gonna use it. What you think they're gonna
not do that? That's what they're doing with
Twitter, guys. So just it you have to
see this kind of conglomerate, this the blob
that's developing in front of you, This technocratic
monster.
I said, still up in the air, but
this is starting to feel like one of
those I told you so moments that you
just never want to come to pass.
Now, on censorship, Candace Owens points this out,
and it's regarding Ian Carroll. Which is actually
crazy to me because these are huge influential
people, and I don't see anybody other than
other influential people, but not Elon or any
Twitter aspect or ex, caring about this, saying
anything. And as far as I can tell,
this account is still there.
Now this is what it says. This account
has been mass doxing, which by the way
is like the only thing he seems to
pretend to care about when he censors people,
except not when it hurts Israel or highlights
something he doesn't wanna talk about. For example,
the Ian Carroll APAC moment where he basically
pretended not to know and Ian Ian laid
it all out and what you know, think
what you want about it. Whether you think
that was a play or, you know, sir
of course, we should consider that. Nonetheless, what
he wrote out was true. And Elon never
responded, and it was embarrassing for him. I
think he really does take that stuff to
heart because these people are petty, in my
opinion, at the end of the day.
Mass doxing and leading harassment campaigns, but has
never been so much as suspended for a
day for violating ex policies.
Now, don't take that as her advocating censorship.
I who knows? Maybe she is. I don't
think that's the case. I would not say
that because I don't think that applies.
Or rather, I just don't think it should
happen. Nonetheless, they have been doing so under
the argument of their terms of service, which
is what most platforms do. I wouldn't argue
that's unexpected,
except it doesn't happen when this kind of
the point is
one rule for thee, not for me kind
of a thing. Now, Ian's the one that
posted this. This was on
13th. 5,000,000 views, by the way. He went
over a 1000000 views recently or a 1000000
followers recently. So it says criticize Israel on
social media, and you immediately get counts like
the the accounts called the awesome Jew, doxxing
your 70 year old grant your parents.
Think about that. You know how peep you
know, Elon gets brushed. Like, they they post
public information
more than once, by the way. The first
one was from the airplane dynamic. Publicly posted
and went on a censorship tear. You disagree
with them on h one v h one
b v says, and he censors an entire
group.
This happens, not a peep.
This is totally mob tactics. Something something, says
something
god's
something something god's chosen people something something most
moral army. He says, not a good look,
awesome Jew. Criticize America's government. I won't take
it personally. Hell, I'll help. He says, Israel
though, can't criticize them. They're perfect or else
we'll harass your elderly parents. This only proves
my point. This isn't normal. And awesome,
jewelry should
oh, I think it just I think that
was an autocorrect. Of course. Awesome Jew should
have been banned for this exact behavior months
ago, years ago. I'm far from the first.
So whatever you think about that, the point
is that is what the Twitter claim should
be the case. This is what it says,
guys. It says, I removed the post suggesting
Ian Carroll is a fake name. It appears
that Ian Carroll is indeed his real name,
and he lives in his parents' $1,000,000 home
in Bellingham,
Washington. His parents, and they list their names
off, both work as professors at those locations.
Guys, that's literally doxing. Like, you could argue
what some other people did wasn't, but was
close enough for them to be concerned. But
are you kidding me?
And it says,
and reportedly sued the public health service after
his birth in Vermont claiming they discharged too
soon following
I mean, my god.
I mean, straight up, guy. Elon Musk, you're
a coward. If you're not if you're gonna
stand there and let this continue. Now I'm
again, don't hear this as I want people
to be censored. What I'm saying is if
you're gonna inconsistently
censor based on terms of service, which is
what all platforms do, or rather just, you
know, remove content based on violations of terms
of service and not do it when it's
the most obvious example we've ever seen,
you already know the answer. It's the same
thing he's already exposed for the last so
many months over and over and over, and
all the other cowards out there that wanna
keep pretending like he's the best guy in
the world, free speech warrior, and you know
who they are, like, gushing about it right
now as he censors people,
then make 2 things. Recognize he's not the
person he pretends to be, that he is
pretending to be somebody, and all the rest
of them that are gaslighting for him are
dishonest people. Period.
That's crazy to me. I'll tell you right
now, if Liberty was harassing my I mean,
I've, you know, I'm not gonna go there.
That's crazy to
me. Now
and we have plenty more to get into
on censorship. I'll put that off further in
the show. But the point here is the
overlap with Elon Musk and this horror a
artificial intelligence direction, which more so overlapped with
the conversation of today with Israel and Palantir
working this whole AI dynamic out. Of course,
using XAI and Twitter as well to kind
of train your control structure. It's coming very
soon. Like, literally, Palantir with Israel work working
on Lavender, habsura, and these murder campaigns in
Israel, and Palantir being a central fixture in
Trump's administration,
basically puppeteering Elon Musk over here with DARPA.
But, nonetheless, we're gonna pretend like everything's okay.
America first.
Zero Hedge reports OpenAI appoints BlackRock executive. Now
here's what's funny to me about this.
We highlight the reality that Elon Musk gets
funding from BlackRock for x AI, that he's
literally using your information to train. That's a
that's a a DARPA program.
The quiet transition from DARPA's XAI to Elon's
XAI.
Okay?
Well, you gotta get funding somewhere was the
typical response you get from the team sport
politics. And then, of course, OpenAI appoints the
BlackRock executive, which is definitely a bigger move.
But, oh my god, this proves that well,
it's it's a in
it's inconsistently,
inconsistent application.
This person says, interesting move by OpenAI. Having
a BlackRock executive on the board could bring
valuable financial expertise to the table.
Yeah. Whatever you think about it, the point
is I think BlackRock is a very concerning
entity. It's literally called a shadow bank even
by the central in institutions. That's what it
is. It is not something and it is
a
it's shown itself over and over to be
involved in basically the one of the largest
kind of puppeteers of society right now. Terrifyingly
so.
Very easy very kind of light way to
put that actually. But so okay. So the
point is BlackRock, OpenAI.
That's bad. I think OpenAI and all these
groups are concerning. Right? And also, BlackRock funding
Elon Musk and OpenAI.
Or excuse me,
XAI.
Let's just don't forget that. It's important.
And then, of course, over here, and we
talked about this, on this show. This was
on that show we discussed this. This is
from December 24th.
Palantir
in talks with OpenAI,
as well as Elon Musk SpaceX
to take on defense giants according to the
Financial Times.
Okay. So it's not necessarily that they're,
you know, working right with each other, but
now you have Elon Musk
through Palantir,
or rather SpaceX with Elon Musk through Palantir
working with OpenAI.
And despite the conversation being that he thinks
OpenAI is gonna kill and destroy the world,
and that's why I'm making my good version.
But now you guys are working together.
You start to get the picture? You're being
played. So the bottom line is, guys, that
this is all coming together in obvious ways
that should not be disguised or ignored,
and this, I think, is a straight up
government connection back to where these things all
come from. Palantir,
AI powered operations for every decision like they're
testing out in Israel.
XAI training with your Twitter information as he's
laid out, working with Israel is a authentic
to verify.
Now Bill Ackman, of course, who's very much
supporting of Donald Trump's administration and tapped into
the entire pro Israel dynamic, says this would
be the dream team talking about that exact
conversation.
Financial Times, Palantir, 2 of the and and
on Anduril, 2 of the largest US defense
technology companies are in talks with a dozen
competitors like SpaceX and OpenAI. Now I'm not
trying to say that that that means that
there
it is an overlap to a larger program.
My point is that if Elon Musk is
up to mind and OpenAI is like the
the the gonna destroy the planet,
Why would you work with them? Why would
you work with a company working with them
to achieve a larger outcome? You know that
makes sense, and it obviously shows that they're
not concerned. And I think the reality is
there's far more overlap to this, and I
think we're all I think we all know
that. But he goes on to say, I
just read an advanced copy of the Technological
Republic, and we talked about this already.
It's called Technological Republic, hard power, soft power,
and the future of the west, written by
Alex Karp,
cofounder of Palantir.
Or at least was it cofounder or,
let me see.
I think he's either cofounder or
So right now he's the CEO of Palantir,
but I believed he was the cofounder. Right?
Yeah. Co founder, right there. So point is,
Palantir,
Alex Karp,
who if you don't remember, I think I've
got it right here. No. Where is that?
Here it is.
As Derek wrote, election 2024, Zionist technocrats versus
Zionist technocrats.
And Alex Karp on one side with Bill
Gates and Kamala and and Soros and and
Schmidt. And on the other side, you've got
Elon Musk and Trump and Adelson and Netanyahu
and
and teal and palantir. Right? The point is
oh, I I guess teal's more on on
the teal's on the Trump side, Karp on
the other side. I just put teal in
the middle because it was kind of like
this trickling down effect from the conversation. But
the point is that they had the impact
on either side, whether Zionist or technocrats. They
won either way. That's what it looks like
to fake.
I mean, maybe it's a harsh word for
some people, but to basically fix the outcome.
And that's, of course, even if you think
your votes even translate to the outcome. But
the point is he writes this book about
the future of the west,
the founders of Palantir. He says they make
the case for big tech working with government
on big tech problems, you know, called technocracy,
guys. That's literally what we're talking about, including
defense.
Explaining how big tech abandoned our government and
opened the point of why they're literally because,
guys, this is what's rolling out. Everywhere you
look, you're watching this happen, including
literally promoting the idea of the Technate
or the Europe the North American Union or
whatever point in the conversation we're at, the
same agenda.
And the people that were calling that out
seem to be ignoring it now.
So
clearly,
this is a group. I think it's obvious
there's one agenda here. Palantir working alongside Israel.
This is a strategic agreement from January 12,
2024.
Anybody that you think they don't know there
was genocide when they made this agreement, guys?
They know what's happening. The world knew what
was happening. And they signed on to allow
Israel to use artificial intelligence programs
to kill children.
This is
972 magazine from Israel, Lavender. The AI machine
directing directing Israel's bombing spree in Gaza.
Open IDF members. I mean, it's horrifying, and
you guys know this. We'll get more to
it at the end about what's going on.
The the reality though,
what do you think they're do I mean,
what are they working on? What do you
think they're training this for?
You think they just try you think you
think they would sign on for this in
in in knowing that we see the overlap
to an obvious genocidal government if there wasn't
a long term play?
Now to overlap that with another horrifying story,
Air Force
Research, how to use social media to control
people like drones
from July 17, 2014.
Containment control model looks at how to group
how groups of influencers
can manipulate people.
Gee. That sounds relevant, doesn't it? Where do
you think we are right now?
Facebook isn't the only organization conducting research into
how attitudes are affected by social media. The
Department of Defense has invested 1,000,000 of dollars
over the past few years investigating social media,
social media networks, and how information spreads across
them.
You know what that kinda sounds like to
me?
DARPA working on, you know, Department of Defense,
by the way.
An AI program that is you is trained
by your engagement with it that can then
ultimately be used to manipulate outcomes. And, of
course, that is,
again, what I just showed you.
Now
being rolled out through, hey, social media.
The quiet transition from DARPA's x ai to
Elon's x ai. That's what we're watching right
now. Using you to train it. Now we've
also seen that dovetail with conversations of digital
twins on meta and using that to map
out your life or in general, being able
to detect whether you're gonna be social and
mentally unstable.
You know, eventually, and we'll lock you up
ahead of time just to be safe.
This is what we're watching, guys.
Now I I would even gonna argue that
influencers that might not even know they're doing
that.
Now I'm I'm gonna go into this more
in the future. This was a passing point
to make today, but this is just terrifying.
I what I'm my my next show I'm
actually, I forgot to mention at the start.
I'm gonna be talking about the nanotechnology
point again.
And remember I briefly showed that?
I briefly showed what I was gonna talk
about. I think it was last show. But
the the the tweets with the nanotech videos,
I luckily downloaded all the videos. I even
have screenshots of the tweets. But I guess
in the last 48 hours, that account has
now been deleted.
No censorship though on this platform, weirdly enough.
Not some, like, rabidly anti Israel account. If
you look, it was mostly about technology and
and nanotech.
Why is it gone? It's been censored, guys.
It's been deleted.
Be and and nanotechnology?
Yes, guys. I think there's a very clear
reason why this topic has been buried in
fake fog stories and whatever else has been
going on. Now I shouldn't say it like
that because, yeah, ultimately,
I just unverified, in in my opinion about
how that story went. But nonetheless, it got
mixed in. But I think that's important. Now,
my I'm I'll come back to that. But
I'll show you more so on that show,
but it's just pretty interesting how this keeps
happening. And I think it's because that's an
important topic they're really trying to suppress right
now. But in this conversation,
I think that we are
actively
being manipulated on social media. I mean, guys,
I is anybody even is that even a
contentious statement today? It's quite obvious. But I
think people ignore
it in places, you know, when it suits
their interests.
As Whitney Webb said on this point, this
research program started over a decade ago, and
now a major military contractor
runs this site.
I mean, again, there's just only so much
you could really just, you know, ignore in
support of your chosen side. As I as
I say in a coming tweet.
But on the same time, right, and this
is the point guys, this is where this
becomes super problematic.
This person says, true story, Grok diagnosed my
mother's broken wrist last week.
And he goes, Grok, so their their AI,
their testing, that is the program guys, through
Twitter, is test with your information.
It says Grok can diagnose medical injuries.
Great.
Isn't that the great reset point that Biden
was pushing and the rest? But, woah, it's
different though because Elon.
And guess what though?
Multiple radiologists in the replies explained that Grok
actually misidentified
a fused growth plate as an obvious fracture.
There is no obvious fracture in the images
shown.
Oops. So guess what? I guess Grok can't
do that. But either way, it's not about
the truth, guys. It's about promoting the idea.
It's just embarrassing, isn't it? This constantly keeps
happening
as they censor things that they don't want
you to see. You're being manipulated.
I know the other AI point, this is
actually terrifying to me just because I this
is what I keep talking about. The deep
fake point or artificial intelligence overlap. And why
in the world or maybe that's the point
and it's already overtaken things and we can't
even tell
why in the world has this not happened
yet. The shoe hasn't dropped. Or again, maybe
it already has.
Angry Tom says, we're so cooked. Now anyone
can clone themselves with artificial intelligence unlocking endless
poses, outfits, camera angles.
Here's how it works.
Actually, I should've grabbed this. Here, let let
me play this for you real quick.
So why don't you watch this video? And
then, she's gonna explain for you how this
actually
works. And it's interesting, and this is my
worry,
obviously, about where this future is going,
or the future that we are going to.
So this isn't angry Tom. This is an
AI avatar created by Tom using HeyGen. Let
me show you how it works.
That's not a real person.
No. This isn't angry Tom. This is an
AI avatar created by Tom using HeyGen. Let
me show you how it works. Tell me
tell me how think about this.
That's not real, by the way. It's very
clear. I can show you. I will.
But you were do you see how clear
that
there's no way. I mean, other the average
person would not know.
I first was like, that I think they're
I think they're tricking us.
That is I mean, other than a maybe,
I can you can maybe barely tell if
the background doesn't seem like it seems like
a background at certain points.
But, guys, that's near flawless.
How in the world are we to believe
that there hasn't been larger efforts from intelligence
around the world? Again, I'm starting to think
that's long since happened, and we're we don't
even know. Broadcast or fake videos or recordings
or old things. I mean, expect think about
easy it would be to fake old videos
now
because you don't need to make it click.
I mean, that's it's just this is quite
terrifying. And I really do want us to
consider that this is what they're trying to
roll out and normalize.
So back to the point.
It says, step 1, open this account or
this website and click on get started for
free. For free. And it says after signing
up, navigate the avatar section, scroll down to
public avatars.
Look, guys, that's her in the background. Now
this or you could argue that basically this
could be a recording that's been used over
it. Nonetheless,
you're still talking about
flawless rep you you put in words and
it reads those words back.
Look. You can just choose from different avatars,
and she's right there at the beginning.
Right there.
Add your script. You can also customize your
voice.
This is the world we're going to. This
is the world we're in. Again, I think
this is the world we've surpassed a decade
ago.
We're now being slowly normalized with where this
goes, and I just think that's wild.
And when you have the things that we
can see being worked on, like, basically, extension
of the government programs through public private partnerships,
it concerns me.
And guess what? Biden issues executive order for
building AI data centers on federal land because
that's totally the way to stick it to
Trump. Right?
Sign executive orders for exactly the direction they're
taking. Yeah. They're fighting each other all the
way. Right?
Again, worked out a deal for Ukraine. Worked
out a conversation for the ceasefire because they're
totally at odds with each other, everyone. Listen
to Alex Jones. They hate each other. Now
look, that doesn't mean that there's not still
some plan.
Like, I mean, look, the the argument of
some kind of Democrat effort to under I
mean, that's certainly what I've said every time.
It wouldn't even be hard to wrap your
mind around.
And our the only thing that I see
developing are, like, conversations about, like, the for
example, you have, like, the new thing with
the SEC with Musk, for example, which I
guarantee will go away the moment Trump takes
power because they'll put someone new in place.
But you also have the conversation about,
what was the other one?
I just lost it.
Anyway, there's there's there's plenty of
what was that? Any case, the point is,
guys, it's clear to me that this is
just simply extension of the same program.
You know? And I you know, I oh,
that's what it was. You're still with the
there what was the personal so basically, the
idea that somebody was going to sue or
go after oh, that's what it was. For
Trump being a convicted felon, for example,
they could argue that that I already see
people talking about how they're gonna try to
make that be the case where he can't
be president, blah blah blah, which will then
be made out to be some massive, like,
that will be everything he told you was
gonna happen and all turns out to be
is some a person making the argument that
it goes away. We'll see though.
It could be, you know, my point is
it's being presented as some massive democrat ongoing
plot to make sure he never takes power
because that's distracting because people love to talk
about that. And maybe it's the truth, wouldn't
surprise me. But the evidence seems pretty sparse
other than coming from his loud mouth. But
on this case, Biden issues executive order for
building AI data centers on federal land that
he's gonna hand off to Trump. And they're
gonna continue that operation. That just does not
seem like what we that shows you coordination
between them, just like Trump handing off the
baton for the COVID nineteen control structure and
a continuation of the shots he created.
I just don't know why it's hard for
people to see that there's con a continuity.
And there shouldn't be any continuity if you
think they're at odds with each other. Now
other than things they might agree on, but
the point is we can argue that there's
deviations in a lot of the things, at
least verbally,
that they see they
seamlessly continue.
And don't forget with the AI stuff, guys.
I mean, we've talked I'm gonna talk more
about in the next show about the artificial
intelligence overlap with nanotech. And we talked about
North Carolina.
The, what was the the town called?
I've got it over here.
Spruce Pine
in North Carolina
is the
single location in the on the planet
for a very high level quartz sand that's
used to basically fuel the AI revolution that's
coming. That's how they're framing it. That was
in the epicenter of that last hurricane when
everyone was talking about lithium, which also matters.
Funny to me that that got ignored even
though there were conservatives talking about it.
So I point this at that town,
since this l then they've been kit people
have been leaving because there's stores that aren't
there anymore. Basically, this has been overtaken by
the AI kind of tech industry. Apple and
Google, and they've all built new big centers
right around there. This is what's going on,
guys. We're we're watching this develop and you're
getting misdirected
constantly.
Now David Icke makes an excellent point based
on what Charlie Kirk said. And this is
just so funny to me. He goes, break
in. Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jeff Bezos,
you know, the the the rebel team fighting
the deep state. Right, guys? We'll sit together
on the platform alongside cabinet picks and elected
officials.
This is an AI image.
He says these people getting special treatment at
the Trump inauguration is good, isn't it? Charley
boy? They are symbols of and that was
Charlie Kirk who shared that. He goes, these
are symbols of the AI control agenda that
your hero is planning to impose in America
to bring in the very system that he
claims to oppose. It's exactly what we were
just talking about. He says, my god. It's
pathetic to see the fake alternative promote the
psyop and suck up to the architects of
the very great reset they once condemned.
You have no shame.
I mean, even if you disagree with all
of that, think about how silly it is
to pretend like Jeff Bezos and Zuckerberg
being alongside him is some kind of a
positive move. Like, let's just even say it
is. Let's just say they've suddenly go, you
know what? We wanna change the world for
the better it goes Trump.
Certainly possible. Right?
Well, the the argument though is that the
Republicans
have been,
rightly so, calling these people out the entire
time. And right now, what they're still doing
is the opposite of what you would argue
Republicans want. But it doesn't matter because you
were to get unity, team unity.
It's all words and narrative and distraction, guys.
These people are not on your side. Not
a single one of them. Especially not the
ones that you already know and have demonstrated
are not on your side.
But, of course, in response to what Charlie
said, Iaccarino says, unity.
So we go, yay.
World Economic Forum, Iacarino says we're all on
the same team. That sounds weird, doesn't it?
Maybe you should rethink that.
Elon Musk responds, honored.
I'm so honored to work with Jeff Bezos
from Amazon and Mark Zuckerberg from from from
Facebook. Because clearly, they have our best interest
at heart. Right?
Because they said so recently.
That's what matters, doesn't it? Not decades decades
of action, but just that they said so
yesterday. Oh, and then he wore a cool
shirt. They're on your side, guys. We can't
be this childish.
And of course,
speaking of childish, Mario Notfall says, wait.
Could we be seeing Facebook files?
If Zuckerberg is serious about transparency, quite the
big if, you would say, but then it's
time for Facebook files.
Woo hoo.
Of course, as doctor Ray Bradley says, still
waiting for the Fauci files. Remember that? Or
any of the source material that was promised.
Remember that?
Thank you, alien invader, for tagging me in
this. How sad.
But, of course, the job is not to
be be honest. His job is to promote
the narrative, which Mario does beautifully.
How how it's just embarrassing.
That never actually happened.
Forgot about this.
Post that for them. I'm sure they'll enjoy
that.
Now,
this is important right here. So what I'm
gonna do next, I've talked about a few
times. And it's the conversation of the ethics
pledge. And I think it it's it's actually
really strange to me how few people are
covering this.
It's not a non story. It's the you
know, it could end up being something that
they just kind of do at the very
last minute, but I would still the point
that I keep making is this entire time
frame right now,
there could be any number of things happening
that we would never know about with foreign
governments because they are dragging their feet on
this. As the guy in the the I
forget his title. I mean, it was the
first show we covered. He was he's the
person that's basically discussing the transition and why
it's important from the government,
agency or not agency, but,
I guess, the group that is basically in
charge of the transition. I just forget the
name of the group. But the point is
the guy who's in charge of that entity
is basically saying, well, this is why this
is important. We don't know the conflicts. And
he stated he could literally be working for
a foreign government and we wouldn't know. That
was a direct quote.
I think he knew what he was saying
right there for obvious reasons, but it could
you any government you wanna make it make
sense with, that has to matter to people
screaming America first or it should, I should
say. So when we're gonna talk what we're
gonna talk about next is the fact that
up to this very moment, according to all
the information I have, he does not. Trump
has yet to sign one. It doesn't appear
he even plans to. And many people in
his circle, like Pam Bondi, for example, have
not. And I think that's important when these
are
rabid Zionists.
Or, again, for anybody for that matter, but
that's what I'm concerned about right now.
So,
first of all, I found this super interesting.
Brave, Google, anything.
I was trying to search today for just
kind of follow-up.
What's the current status? Right? I've searched this
a 1,000 different ways. I just use I
just I'm showing the one that I think
is the most clearly not about the organization.
2025
presidential ethics pledge is what it says. Okay?
No matter what you search for right now,
and I mean, even on Twitter,
you get bombarded
with the news story about Trump's organization
and an ethics pledge conversation that they're all
worried about.
Totally could be a coincidence.
I don't think so. I I think it's
very obvious the way these things work. Look
at this, guys. I mean, is that even
do I even say Trump's organization? Do I
say anything about I mean, it's this presidential
ethics pledge, but yet every single platform,
Trump Organization.
I'll I'll I'll show you what they're talking
about. It is there's there's there's interesting points
to make. It's Trump's organization,
not the same as Trump and his presidential
campaign or administration,
basically changing their or ignoring certain or not
including certain parts of their previous ethics pledge
that they think are important, which I would
agree about what Trump may do or benefit
from while he's president while his organization is
supposed to be not, you know, they always
play the game of they'll let his family
control it, but it's clearly still a potential
conflict of interest. Just like we saw with
Biden and Hunter, same conversation.
So the point here is that while you
search for the ethics pledge for the presidency,
New York Times, CNN, Washington Post, every one
of them. Organization. Trump Organization. Trump Organization. F
ethic pledge from Trump's organization.
Endless pages of this. Not a single example.
I had to I had to go through
some abstract I'm not even gonna show you
what I had to do. Took me forever
to find one article talking about the current
reality from Rolling Stone from, like, 2 days
ago. I just find it to be pretty
interesting, guys. Just like we told you before,
that's not even how these platforms are supposed
to work. That's controlled or manipulated. If I
type in presidential ethics pledge, I should get
search results for the presidential ethics pledge. And
you maybe at some lower down version, you
would get these because it includes ethics pledge.
Right? But not bombarded with the opposite of
what you're looking for unless that's something that
they want you to see as an expense
of what I'm gonna show you next.
Same on Twitter, by the way.
Now first,
before we get to the organization part of
it, this is from January 13, 2025.
Breach of protocol is the quote. Senator still
don't have ethics filings from Trump nominees. Now
this is just about the nominees right now,
which I, by the way, do find interesting
that they don't mention Trump's part of it,
which I'll show you next.
It says confirmation hearings for a slew of
Donald Trump's picks. By the way, people are
already going before congress right now. Some of
which don't have these things signed, like Pam
Bondi. Did they even bring that up?
Instead, they're only focused on weird partisan mentally,
you know, were like, Pete Hegcess in front
of them. A guy that literally just
both Tom Cotton and him, I'll show you,
openly said that we're Christian Zionist, which to
them is not problematic. But to the world
that's watching Zionism do a genocide, yeah, it
matters.
As for watching Zionism influence our government, yeah,
it matters. As we're saying Zionism's doing that,
and they're called we're called conspiracy theorists, and
he's openly telling you that. My point is,
what are they asking about?
We have reports that you're drunk when you're
working or dumps, things that are I mean,
that I guess matter in some context.
But I can't believe the things you're they're
being asked, which shows you either that the
democrat side of congress are so wildly inept
in their positions or that they're all working
together, and they don't want you to see
that they're all working in the interest of
a foreign government or however you wanna frame
it. My point is this should be a
monumental
story for people literally trying to find reasons
to not bring these people into congress or
into government.
Don't you think so? First thing, you haven't
signed your ethics pledge. Move aside. Nope. I
don't see them bringing it up unless I'm
missing that. Now it says confirmation hearings for
a slew of them,
for the cabinet, and other high ranking positions
are scheduled to begin this week. Senate committees
still have not received vetting materials
for several nominees.
And many of their financial disclosures and ethics
disclosures have not yet been made public.
On Monday, with less than 24 hours before
the confirmationary, which by the way is already
essentially a violation. They were supposed to do
this, like, a month and a half ago.
It says, embattled defense secretary Pete Hegseth's financial
disclosure and ethics agreements were fina finally released
to the public. Now, again, my point was
about Bondi who was in front of them
and they didn't bring it up because she's
one of them. I'll show you in a
second. Hegseth, it does appear, has put this
stuff forward. And it says the disclosure form
shows the former Fox News host received $4,600,000
in salary from,
from Fox News
over the past 2 years, as well as
100 of 1,000 of dollars in speaking fees
for dozens of appearances he made.
Many of them before conservative and religious groups.
You know damn well what that means. That's
that's not a joke. I mean, it's verifiable.
This guy literally speaks and gets paid by
Israel all over the place to speak for
Zionist interest, for Israeli interest. He is a
open open fanatic in regard to the the
prophecy, the end times for Israel.
I mean, that's just incredibly insane that we're
talking about that in somebody in the secretary
of defense position.
My god. Let's say it goes on to
say the senate armed services committee reportedly only
received his background check from the FBI late
Friday.
I don't I mean, I don't believe any
of this stuff. I think all of these
groups or entities are compromised, but that's for
you to decide. While the public learned Sunday
that Lee Zeldin, Trump's pick to lead the
EPA, recently made a fortune authoring
paid op eds on behalf of secret clients.
Several other prominent nominees' ethics disclosures have not
been released.
Yeah. But gee, I wonder what secret clients
we're talking about.
These include attorney general nominee Pam Bondi as
one that have not disclosed these ethics con
conflict conflicts of interest. And she is, like
all the rest,
rabidly pro Zionist, pro Israel.
Transportation secretary Sean Duffy, secretary
interior secretary nominee Doug Bergman, Homeland Security nominee
Kristi Noem. These are all very concerning.
CIA director nominee John Ratcliffe and energy secretary
nominee Chris Wright.
It says the responsibility lies with the Republicans
who are trying to force nominees through regardless
of proper vetting. Now do you know what's
coming? Like, if this actually gets brought up,
what are they gonna say? They're trying to
keep our people out. And maybe they are.
But, obviously, this is one of the most
important reasons to I mean, this this is
one of the most logical reasons to not
confirm somebody. We don't even know what your
conflicts are. So my point is twofold. If
they don't bring it up, that's wildly clear.
If they do, it will most likely be
used to say they're trying to keep our
people out, when in reality, it seems like
you wanted that to happen because you didn't
do what needed to be done. But, of
course, that won't be covered accurately by partisans
who wanna manipulate manipulate you around the topic.
But it says, Taylor Rogers, a spokesperson for
Trump's Vance transition,
says that nominees, quote, paperwork is being submitted
quickly to ensure the confirmation process is smooth
and President Trump is able to implement his
agenda mandate on day 1. Oh, and so
in other words, she just lied and sidestepped
and gave you a narrative. Because that's not
what's happening. So she just go, you know,
the
so on day 1, despite the fact that
that's clearly not what's already happening, they they
are light years away from any of this
happening on day 1 anymore. Maybe save for
the ceasefire point, and we'll see how that
goes. We'll get to that in a second.
My point, though, is that that's just ridiculous.
What she just said is completely contrary to
the facts. But that's politics for you. Or
he, excuse me. Taylor, or maybe it is
a girl.
Anyway, the point is, quote, the committee still
has not received the standard financial disclosure report,
ethics agreement, or the opinions from the designated
agency ethics officer
and the office of government ethics stating that
the nominee is in compliance with the ethics
laws, which are required by law of all
nominees for positions that require state senate confirmation.
Now to be clear, I don't trust any
of these people. I don't believe the government
has interest in like, for example,
you could get an argument from from somebody
that might say, well, why should we have
to comply with their ethics? They're in they're
dishonest or they're trying to keep us out
above us. Okay. Maybe that's the case. Maybe
the the what they're trying to hold you
to is an impossible. Right? Then make that
case. Prove that. Don't
broadly point at this abstract idea and then
just never that is manipulation. That's propaganda. If
you think that's it if if they you
think they shouldn't have to go through this
process despite Trump being the one that signed
this into law in his last administration,
which, by the way, I oh, I'll get
to in a second that he bucks that
later on the way out for his own
interest.
Then make the make the argument that this
shouldn't have to be done for x, y,
and z, and lay out your evidence. To
just not do it and act like it's
their fault, that's childish kinda stuff. And it
says, in view of the fact that the
committee still does not have these documents, which
are essential for us to faithfully discharge our
constitutional advice and consent responsibilities,
we respectfully request that you postpone the scheduled
hearing on governor Burgum's nomination for at least
a week to give members sufficient time to
receive and review these materials.
Yeah. And they're gonna cry foul as you
well know despite that being a pretty logical
statement. But tell me in the chat, by
the way, if you saw the mask of
Pam Bondi I was watching, I did not
see it brought up. May maybe I missed
it. Certainly possible.
So my point would be right there. If
they never asked her about that, how do
you make sense of that?
Now, on Trump's side of it, and we
talked about this many times already. As of
January 15th, there's no indication that Donald Trump
has signed his ethics agreement
despite
his organization announcing the new ethics plan on
just on January 10th. Now I think that
was meant to sort of which it seems
to have worked. Kind of buried the conversation.
Right? They rolled out some broader organization ethics
plan. A plan. Not a pledge. Nothing signed.
A generalized plan for where their ethics will
go.
Hoping I think that would, and it did
in a lot of ways, silence the conversation.
But as of right now, there's no indication
he has actually signed
an ethics pledge, which includes conflicts of interest.
You know, like maybe the foreign government controlling
his outcomes.
I think that's so absolutely wild to me.
So on the organization side
of it, the other story that seems to
be burying the whole conversation,
there's still worthy points to make here. The
Trump Organization, separate from his administration for the
presidency, is to limit
involvement his involvement in New Ethics plan, which
is usually what you expect. Right? They go,
you know, while your president will pretend you're
not in charge of the company.
Here's what it says.
Or was that, next one?
Oh, this is this is the same article?
Oh, no. This is a different one.
Okay. So the same my point is just
to show you in general that they're all
they're highlighting this, and this is the main
focal point.
And it says, this is the one from
January 10, 2025.
And it says,
the agreement does not the one that for
his organization, to be clear, does not address
potential ethics questions
that could emerge as a result of the
Trump family's relationship with World Liberty Financial,
a cryptocurrency.
Interesting. And now, to be clear, this is
something they've removed from the last time they
signed this. Now, why would they do that?
It says, at the same time that mister
Trump will be naming the new chairman
of the s e c with which regulates
cryptocurrency. You got David Sachs behind the AI
cryptocurrency
direction.
I it's guys, it's just such a this
is like a if they made an SNL
skit about how this went, we would laugh
about it 10 years ago. This is so
crazy how how
Republicans don't wanna call out how really obvious
all of this is. Nonetheless, the point is
that now this shift away even for his
organization seems to leave open the door for
profiting off of his cryptocurrency direction.
I that's it's it's just so transparent to
me right now.
Now this one says, Trump Organization not pledging
to ban private foreign deals in a separate
point. Same conversation.
This one's from yesterday.
I had a highlighted part in here. It
says,
Donald Trump began his first press term.
It says the ethics agreement that said it
would halt any international real estate deals. That
pledge is, like the other one, is now
missing from their their current pledge agreement. The
Trump family only agrees to quote, no new
transactions
with foreign governments.
Are you not really seeing this, guys? I
mean, come on. So now from his business
side of it, he's made a complete carve
out for still being able to work with
foreign governments, which would include Israel, obviously.
So that means they're not gonna dis there
this is there's current there are things right
now going on that they don't wanna stop,
whether that's because of an agenda or because
maybe they're just making money. Either way, that's
crazy.
It really is. Now they go on to
make all the case for it. You can
decide for yourself. Of course, it'll be disregarded
as partisan and, you know, hate Trump stuff,
Trump derangement syndrome, despite wherever the person, this
being a valid point.
That's pretty interesting to me.
Now, I mean, guys, I really do think
that this as long as we can be
honest about the issue, it doesn't have to
mean that it is there. But clearly, without
the acknowledge without the
without signing a pledge, for example, it leaves
open the door clearly for you. Well, what's
behind that? What don't we see?
That doesn't prove that something's wrong. But if
it's not done and no one's pointing it
out, I think that really does begin to
make a case for why there's something darker
going on around this. I think that's important.
Now I'll include, by the way, this episode
we just did. And I was gonna put
this out today. Not this, but a new
interview. But I I recently interviewed Mitch Burcham,
very, very intelligent guy around the conversation of
Bitcoin, and I wrote how the government come
commandeered Bitcoin and its decentralized future. Now
even very clearly, his mindset is that this
is something that was designed in a way
that would be, you know, peer to peer
transaction, circumvent the government, and ultimately been hijacked,
but arguably can still be used to benefit
us in a, like, anarchistic libertarian, like, bad
government bad perspective.
Now you
you you can I hope you will consider
it, come to your conclusions about it? I'm
still you know, there's a lot of things
I'm still very up in the air about.
I I agree with the potential, and I
and I hope that's the reality. On the
alternatively, I just it will kind of alternatively.
A lot they align with on more than
you think. I interviewed Mark Goodwin from,
from Rights for Unlimited Hangout, former editor in
chief or editor of, Bitcoin Magazine
yesterday, day before yesterday. And so that was
gonna come out today, but I decided to
do a show instead. That'll be out probably
tomorrow.
But mostly agree other than he actually he
clearly thinks that this was started as a
government operation, which there's a lot of evidence
for. He really made an excellent case, but
still feels like it could be used to
benefit. So I think that's an important point.
Like, ultimately be used to fight back is
the point. And they both very much have
that same mindset. So that'll be coming out
tomorrow, most likely. I'll include this interview because
the overall point is the concern about how
this comes together with the current government structure.
And as Donald Trump with his world financial
liberty financial carve out and their Bitcoin direction
and all this, it's it is a worrisome
direction. How that intertwines with artificial intelligence. We
talk about all this. There's a bigger story
here, and I hope we're willing to consider
it.
Now
let's talk about
well, the or actually, first
yeah. So before we get to the deal,
more than the also on the point of
the ethics pledge, also with the artificial intelligence.
Here are some more examples of the you
know, they just demonstrate that false resistance
position. Okay? So first, I just wanna highlight
this because this is oh, wait. That was
oh, no. I'm sorry. This was the wrong
spot. Let me go over here. I'll come
back to that. We'll set that this is
just an image, not because of the fire
thing, but just the image of Gaza. I
want you to see what Gaza looks like
that's completely flattened. That was just in the
wrong spot. We'll talk about that before we
get into the deal. Because I wanna make
that point about, you know, what what does
the deal amount to. But before we get
there,
Carrie Wedler wrote this. This is on 13th.
So many things MAGA is cheering right now
would be getting their scorn and condemnation if
Biden, Kamal, or any of the Democrats did
it. It, and you know
that. If you find yourself simping for the
incoming administration in the face of their stark
hypocrisy and departures from campaign rhetoric,
ask yourself what you'd do
and what you'd say if the evil Democrats
called for or did the same exact things.
Appointing lobbyists, neocons,
Wall Street financiers,
and servants of the foreign government, acquiring countries
in a step toward world government,
perpetuating section 702, mass surveillance. All of these
are happening in the Trump administration.
Cozying up to tech oligarchy in the deep
state Palantir.
If you would cry this in your perceived
political enemies, but excuse it when it's your
perceived team, the establishment propaganda has you exactly
where the masters want you.
Very important to hear. Now on that note,
here's Rubio calling for bold diplomacy
to end the Ukraine war.
Now what he actually said,
this war has to end, and I think
it should be the official policy of the
United States that we want to see it
end. So very clearly,
we want the Ukraine war to end. But
that's not what Trump seems to be aiming
for, but we'll have to wait and see
action. But I just simply wanna highlight that
this is the opposite of what we were
told. Now Trump has already pretty much walked
that back. But with narrative, we haven't seen
action yet, not from Trump and his you
know, we'll know once he's actually
officially in power.
But
here's Rubio who's, in a major position in
the administration going, no. No.
Or rather, the sorry. The point is Rubio
saying we want this to end. As Trump
seems to be off arguing, we're gonna continue
it. Now but this was the original idea.
Right? That we're gonna end this on day
1. Now that's not gonna happen. I'll tell
you right now. That doesn't seem even remotely
possible.
Well, we can all hope. Same with Israel.
Same with Palestine.
But I just think it's important to recognize
the difference, the the discrepancy. Now one of
the things and what I wanna show you
is not just the fake resistance, but the
fact that right now, a lot of them
are coming out and just yelling the thing
they want you to think is gonna happen.
Now as we already see Trump deviating from
that just but but with words, but still
matters because if it mattered when he said
he was gonna stop, it should matter when
he says he's not gonna stop. Right? But
neither have come to pass yet.
Rubio just goes, we're gonna do this, and
everyone goes, see? We told you. And that's
how this keeps working.
Words mean nothing until we see the outcome.
It's just words. He could be wrong. He
could be lying. He could be he could
change his mind.
Because here's what matters.
Not I shouldn't say that like that, but
here's what also matters.
Over here, you got Rubio saying, we're gonna
end the war. Okay. Here is the incoming
national security adviser, Mike Waltz.
Quite a bit quite a bit different. So
the other thing that we're going to need
to see is really,
stabilizing things, on the battlefield. And one of
the things that we'll be asking of the
Ukrainians,
is they have real manpower
issues.
You know, their draft age right now is
26 years old, not 18. I don't think
a lot of people realize that. They could
generate
100 of thousands of new soldiers. So when
we hear about morale problems, when we hear
about issues,
on the front line look.
If the Ukrainians have asked the entire world
to be all in for democracy,
we need them to be all in for
democracy.
Right. So force more people to go to
war. It's quite a bit different, isn't it?
And they certainly have fought bravely. They certainly,
have taken a very noble and tough stand,
but we need to see those manpower shortages
addressed. This isn't just about munitions, ammunition,
or writing more checks.
It's about seeing the front lines,
stabilize so that we can enter into some
type of deal. Mhmm.
Very clear. As Michael Tracy says, the incoming
Mike Waltz says the Trump administration will ask
Ukraine to lower its draft age to 18.
So Ukrainian forces gain the manpower to blunt
Russian advances, which won't happen. I mean, it's,
you guys, they're being destroyed.
In most ways, you could you could we've
been talking about this for a very long
time. That's why the people call it the
meat grinder. That's why they're loo I mean,
they're they're on a shortage of people because
they're being
but it doesn't matter because they don't care
about the people. They care about what they
wanna accomplish.
Like, with with everything we're talking about. What
is resources from Greenland or messing with Russia
at the expense of the Ukrainian state?
But democracy, though, well, you screen the word
democracy, and we'll pretend like that makes sense.
Now it says Walt seems to be in
sync with Jake Sullivan on this. As on
other many issues, to my knowledge, the Biden
administration has never increased the concrete ask for
the Ukraine to lower their age. They did,
though, and he follows up and says, I
stand corrected. The outgoing Biden administration has been
urging variants of this since late November, and
the incoming Trump administration appears to have adopted
the same position as the Biden administration.
But, yeah, as you run screaming from that,
la la la, I don't wanna hear it
because it shows me that they're working in
the same direction.
Hopefully, you can, at some point, come up
from that and go, oh my god, I
was lying to myself. The reality is clearly
they are in the same direction.
There's so many examples like that. Now, again,
we'll wait and see what actually happens.
But that should matter to people pointing out
the other side of it. Right? Now, in
the same thread,
JD Vance News, whatever that this none of
these counts that has now got 300,000 followers
because they just kinda glom on, right, chase
the coattails and go we're gonna it's so
funny. But it goes breaking. In fact, Ramaswami
says that all members of congress should be
required to disclose whether they're dual citizens of
foreign nation. Now, I the point is, whether
this is even true. It's not and point
is oh, here, let's do this real quick.
This is something I added late.
So my point wasn't even whether that was
something he said.
That one's old. That's not the same one.
Yeah. I mean, it doesn't it doesn't appear
to be. You know, let me know the
chat if you see that he did say
this. My point
though is that you got major influential accounts
that are very clearly pro Trump that are
making this statement as if Vivek or maybe
he did say it. The point is that
if he did, the point is that I
don't believe for a second that that's what
they actually want to do or that he
would even say that quite frankly.
But the the narrative of getting you to
think that if it didn't happen is all
the same point.
Why would they be doing that when most
of that cabinet
are in opposition? Or that Hegseth is screaming.
He's a Christian Zionist.
There's a there's a clear overlap there that
is problematic for that. But if I think
it's about trying to feign the thing that
gets the people secretly, I'll show you at
the very end, who are always going, don't
worry. They'll save Israel for last as QAnon
told us. That's that's the whole point. It's
all a
big play. But, you know, but allowing an
entire civilization to be destroyed to the dirt
for the play. You know, that that's how
it works. Or give it making you making
sure everyone takes these deadly shots just to
make sure you trick the Democrats.
Quite the logic, isn't it?
We do this real quick.
Alright. Just do the brave. Let's see what
it says.
Has advocated for members of Congress to disclose.
It says right there.
Let's see.
Nope. That's the old one.
Interesting.
Another PolitiFact. We'll see what it says at
the bottom.
Pants on fire. Never mind. I was gonna
receive what it said. See if they tried
to The point is there are a lot
of people that have dual citizenship in our
congress. The point is they won't admit that.
The reality
is the Zionists have influ infiltrated
this country, this government.
That shouldn't be contentious to point out right
now. It's not a conversation about Jewish people.
It includes that, but includes Christians too. It
includes a lot of people that Zionist manipulate.
But it's not about 1 or the other
explicitly.
That's the way they get you to ignore
the whole point.
Zionists.
The reality though, as we'll show you with
Hegseth and plenty of others,
that's not what's happening.
Now if you think for a second that
that's what they're gonna do, it wouldn't make
any sense. It's again, look. Wait a minute.
The point is he it's an idea.
Wait for action. What is the outcome? When
we get to a point to where something
is stated or a law is actually being
discussed, well, then we can go, there, thou
it matters.
Right now,
this is the most Zionist, most pro Israel
administration
in the history of this country as far
as I can tell.
Patrick Hemmingsen says, so when did White House
cabinet confirmation hearings become a religious extremist Zionist
struggle session? When did our government officially become
Israel first?
This is one of the most, like, almost
I don't know what you call it. Like,
one of the most, like
I don't know. Tom Cotton is a very
interesting entity. Like I've said before, he he
strikes me as a person who got picked
on his entire life and now loves the
fact that he's got power. That's the kind
of impression I get from him. He's a
very kind of childish person the way he
presents himself. Very petty, very accusatory.
Like, he just seems like an in an
immature person, quite frankly. But
in this conversation,
he is put like, basically, almost trying to
4 it seems as if Hegseth almost didn't
want to say this out loud. But Tom
Cotton, who gets a lot of money from
APAC along with all the rest of them,
is pushing the idea. Aren't you a Zion
and I'm a Zionist?
It seems like a very weird thing to
do.
And this is in the confirmation. What does
this have to do
with anything other than to try to make
a statement or try to highlight this in
the interest of praising the thing that is
not America first? In fact, Zionism is explicitly
not America first.
Here's the
conversation. Audience here. Many of them seem to
be
patriotic supporters
of you, mister Hegsetz. Some of them seem
to be liberal critics of you. I would
note that it's only the liberal critics that
have disrupted this hearing.
As was my custom
during the Biden administration, I I wanna give
you a chance to respond to what they
said about you. I think the first one
accused you of being a Christian Zionist. I'm
not really sure why that is a bad
thing. I'm a Christian. I'm a Zionist. Zionism
is that
the Jewish people deserve
a homeland
Incorrect.
In the ancient holy land where they've lived
since the dawn of history. Incorrect.
Do you consider yourself a Christian Zionist? Just
to be clear, guys, this shouldn't even be
something we debate anymore.
And this is what's so infuriating because people
like Tom Cotton still reference atrocity propaganda that
has been deemed debunked even by Israeli media.
He still references false narratives about historical events
that have been proven
exclusively, like, a 100 times over to be
false, but he doesn't care because he has
an interest in a an agenda. He's working
for something other than American interests. We shouldn't
even be debating this anymore. The reality clearly
is this man is willing to blatantly lie
for a foreign country and then potentially bring
people in that are willing to do the
same.
Since the dawn of time? I mean, guys,
we're not this stupid. There's there's so much
evidence other than there that aren't just Zionist
narratives and weird thing that it's documented by
the United Nations, documented by a 1,000 different
things. But let's just even say you don't
agree with that. The bottom line is that
what he's trying to highlight is that Zionism
is something it's just about Jewish homeland. No.
It is not. You can look up the
history for yourself. You can look at the
atheist that was Herzl who started the conversation
and founded by a group of Christian Zionists
and manipulated the Jewish population that that was
resisted by the Jewish people in the area
for a very long time. It's painful.
These people are either that stupid or are
so desperately trying to get people in positions
of power who also are willing to lie
for Israel.
It kills me. And now he made it
clear. I'm a Christian Zionist, so did Biden.
You probably won't hear Trump say something like
that, but it's the same conversation. These people
are either openly Zionist or are completely influenced,
controlled, blackmailed, bribed by a Zionist. That's what
I believe. That's not a contentious statement. You
can prove this through their APAC, through the
ADL, through these spy agencies they're using to
aggressively influence outcome.
I mean, again, James Lee did the documentary
highlighting
Greenblatt openly saying, we can get these groups
to change their algorithms, and then you see
Twitter change their algorithm in the interest of
this conversation.
It's not that hard to wrap your mind
around. It's not racist to point out governments
manipulating governments,
but they love to make you think it
is. Now here is Hegseth's response. Senator, I
support I'm a Christian, and I robustly support
the state of Israel
and its existential defense and the way, America
comes alongside them is a a great honor.
Because another one another protester, and I think
this one was a Oh, by the way,
he very carefully tried to avoid saying the
word Zionist. Despite guys, look up his own
content. He proudly calls himself a Zionist. Why
wouldn't he say it right there?
Think about that. Member of Code Pink, which
by the way is a Chinese communist front
group.
He's the what an idiot. This guy is
such a moron.
Like, you can you could say all you
want about the partisan direction of a Code
Pink, a Chinese communist front. I mean, that's
the same the thing they call Palestinian supporters
Hamas,
funded by Hamas. It's just lazy. Or Nancy
calling them domestic terrorists.
I mean, this is is serious language from
powerful people. Very irresponsible, but that's my point.
These are dangerous,
childish people who wield a lot of power,
not as powerful as we like to pretend
they are, but enough.
And yet this is how they act. These
days,
said that you support Israel's war
in Gaza.
I support Israel's existential war in Gaza. I
I assume, like me and president Trump, you
support that war as well, don't you? Right.
At a moment when the entire world sees
it's a genocide, that we have every single
institution that has any standing in the conversation
as explicitly stated that the genocide, half this
most of this country thinks that. Israeli media
thinks that. The world thinks that. The UN
thinks that. Amnesty. New York I mean, it
goes on forever.
And here they are knowing you see that,
knowing you know that.
This is how they stand.
I just don't think we can stand you
you at the very least, consider
why a politician who relies
on your support,
who knows all of this, would say the
opposite
knowing this.
There's only a few explanations, guys. You can
figure that out for yourself. Senator, I do.
I support Israel destroying
and killing every last member of Hamas.
And the
So the there's so many things to add
on top of that, like the reality of
what we continue to see. Like the fact
that Israel funds Hamas right up until October
7th. That's not up for debate. Or on
top of the fact that ultimately when they
made that the reality, when they after 2006,
Hamas ultimately was the government, well, that became
a reality that overtook the area. Okay? That
and a group that was funded by Hamas,
funded by Israel. That's the fact. So that
then makes the reality that there was a
lot that Hamas overlapped, including
every government institution. So anything you needed, a
driver's license, then you're working through the Hamas
government. So that what that did is it
gave the Hamas label to a ton of
stuff in the area that wasn't the Hamas
military act entity.
And so that's my point to not only
you have, like, UNRA things that have, like,
a Hamas label on it. That doesn't mean
that they're part of the military organization.
It could, of course. But just realize how
silly that is. Aside from UNRA, people that
work at school, at hospitals can have things
that because of that. Now that's most likely
today because a lot has changed since that
point, but I'm saying there are still remnants
of that. And so when you stand here
and act like we need to destroy every
element,
well, what if they're surrendering?
Right? What if they're not even a 1000
ways. The point is that what they're doing
is the continuation of the genocide, and they
are doing so on the bones of children
while you see them, while you know what
they're doing.
And they'll sit there and proudly bring it
out.
It it's it's creepy.
It's unnerving.
Now Libs of TikTok, of course, came out
and very much enjoyed it.
I support killing all of them. Right? Because
libs of TikTok is clearly about Israel first.
Right? Can't can't hide that. It's all about
Israel's interest.
Michael Tracy says Pete Headset is an end
times fanatic.
A former professional Iraq war lobbyist
called for bombing North Korea and Iran, demanded
secret weapons shipments to Ukraine, and the list
goes on. Does that perfectly line up with
the Trump administration? No. It doesn't at all.
At least what they say they wanna do,
but it does with what they're actually gonna
do. It says, but of course, send dems
focus on women in combat and frivolous personal
picadillos. That's my point from before.
How do you make sense of that?
I don't think that's an I don't think
they're just that stupid. I think it's very
many of them are. But I think the
reality is that they're not supposed to poke
at this. They're not supposed to pull on
this thread. Are you unaware,
left or right out there, that Israel influences
everybody in congress?
That they proudly tell you that 97%
of the seats have been funded by APAC?
Because you how do you con how are
we confused about what that shows you?
Now Derek Brose says f this guy because
of what Max Blumenthal says in the video
that I'm gonna show you right now.
He says Trump's secretary of defense nominee, Pete
Hegseth, sucked up to some of Israel's most
violent, fanatical settlers in 2016. You know, the
ones that the whole world has been reporting
are raping and burning people alive?
Hope you saw that. Even harratz, even things
like I think it was like the Washington
Post covered these groups that bay Biden pretended
he was gonna sanction until he got yelled
at by Smotrich.
That's who this is Pete Eggseth who is
proudly working alongside the radical elements that have
done the worst things you've seen in this
conversation. He says telling them that the Palestinians
of Hebron comprise a massive city besieging this
incredible holy site. Otherwise, known as the illegal
occupation of Israel on Palestinian land. But, you
know, we'll let them make up whatever they
want as long as we pretend if you
disagree, it's racist. That's how this works.
As you can as in the video itself,
you'll see the I I I think I'm
only gonna show the first part of it.
But a man that's clearly from New York
standing there and acting like he's, you know,
destined to be in Israel. Like, it's just
sad the way these people operate. And I
some of them buy it. But the point
is the actual leadership
are tricking you too.
The movie was fantastic. I'll be honest. Before
coming to Hebron, I
didn't truly understand the depth of significance.
Oh, and in case you've in case you
don't know this, they've been doing these propaganda
now this is not October 7th stuff. This
is from a while ago. But they've been
doing these fake propaganda Israel history videos that
convince people they wanna manipulate
forever. That's just simply Zionism for you.
Both historically. I mean, biblically, I understood in
a basic sense. But when you again, when
you see it physically, when you see it
for real in in front of you, you
realize
the the significance. You go inside and you
realize,
the contention ongoing where
Jews can go and where they can't go.
And then you walk outside Oh, really? Where
Jews can and can't go? You know how
fun it is to flip that around? Where
I mean, you're like see, this is my
point.
He's not stupid.
Unless he was completely confronted with a fake
rial. The point is if you it's easy
to prove, Jews can go most everywhere, and
there are very specific areas where Arabs are
allowed to go. They're not allowed to go
anywhere else in these under these controlled area.
There are places right now in these areas
where they can't even go out their front
door because the the street is considered Jews
only. They have to literally go outside and
climb up on the roof and go over
it. I just covered this. That's a main
story.
And so he's gonna tell you that there
are play
first of all, if any of them wanted
to go into any of the Arab areas,
they very much could. Robert has covered this
forever.
So he frames it as the reverse. There
are places where Jews aren't allowed to go,
but as if that's the Arabs making that
the reality. Are are they passing the legislation
that creates this? You guys, he's not this
stupid.
These people are invested in a very clear
direction at the expense of an entire culture.
That's that's just disgusting.
You see the entire city of Hebron and
you decide and you realize,
the contention ongoing where Jews can go and
where they can't go. And then you walk
outside and you see the entire city of
Hebron and you realize,
that it's effectively surrounded. It's a massive city.
Surrounded by the people that, you know, originally
lived there.
Besieging,
this one incredibly holy site of Judaism as
was said Or or a holy site for
religion. Right? And in fact, like, the bottom
line, like, for example, you know, we're talking
about a lot of these conversations. Like, this
is overlapping with the prophetic discussion, the destroying
of Al Aqsa Mosque and the rebuilding of
the 3rd temple. Like, right now, Al Aqsa
is a mosque.
Now the location itself is is a holy
site for pretty much
Christians, for for Jews, for Muslims.
Okay? What's interesting though is it's a mosque,
and yet right? It's it's regarded as something
that's theirs and nobody else's, and that's why
you see them rush in and bomb people,
smoke bombs, or kill people, which has happened
before. Unarmed praying people.
But you won't hear about that by the
rabid Zionists.
To me, this is the root of Judaism,
which,
my good friend here gave me. Now it's
arguably a root or central religious location for
a lot of different groups, but to them,
nobody else.
That's supremacy, guys. And I'm gonna use going
forward. It's true.
And, I commend
the, the the courageous community that, that maintains
the heritage heritage here. So thanks for having
me. We're really yeah. We we maintain that
illegal occupation. We'll support you all the way.
That that's your defense secretary.
Now here, of course, Robbie Starbuck wants to
highlight the thing that works for the narrative.
Right? Here he is saying COVID shots and
we're gonna get, you know, things like, look
over there.
Every we know the Republicans will all lurch
into the thing that it's a COVID conversation,
which is an important conversation, by the way,
but using these things. Look, a pedophile.
Jump over there. Stop paying attention to this
important account or the other things we were
just showing you. That's how I read it.
He says, Pete Hegset has announced that thousands
of troops who were fired over the experimental
COVID vaccine will be apologized to and reinstated.
Yeah. Maybe. But it's just words.
Wouldn't surprise me though because that seemed to
be something that they're gonna it's a it's
a low hanging fruit. It's really easy to
do because it'll give people the excuse to
pretend that Trump doesn't support the thing that
he explicitly still supports. Here's what he says.
Many other patriots. How many other people of
conscience? We haven't even talked about COVID.
And the tens of So by the way,
that wasn't the focus. He just kinda deviated
from what they were talking about into the
COVID conversation. Of thousands of service members who
were kicked out because of an experimental vaccine.
Yeah. A vaccine that Trump rolled out. A
vaccine that Trump still praises. Warp speed was
that vaccine. And, of course, people were still
manipulated in that conversation before Biden's administration. But,
yes, it got wildly more intense during Biden's
administration.
Ask,
I've I've interviewed many military members that are
involved in this conversation that very clearly make
the case that it was also I mean,
just to be clear, most of them still
call out Trump for his actions all the
way through the administration as well as Biden.
But, yes, the conversation came to a head
just because of the timing.
I I guarantee you the same thing would
have happened if it would have come to
that same point and Trump was still in
power. If he got reelected, the same thing
would have happened. Now that's my opinion. I
guarantee people who don't want to think that
will push back, but I could be wrong.
The bottom line though is that what he's
talking about is a shot that Donald Trump
rolled out.
And to apologize to all of them for
taking a shot that he rolled out and
still praises
doesn't really feel like that much of a
win, especially since they're all still gonna be
struggling from the side effects of whatever that
dangerous thing gave them, and also still have
lost most of what they lost because of
that whole dynamic.
And the tens of thousands of service members
who are kicked out because of an experimental
vaccine in president Trump's defense department, they will
be apologized to, they will be reinstuted reinstituted
with pay and rank. Reinstated. It's like focusing
on extremism, senator,
have created a climate inside our ranks that
feel political.
Now, obviously, the point is that if you're
gonna try to pretend that the military is
all domestic terrorists, which is kinda where they're
gonna get into, it's ridiculous. I mean, I
it's that is the game. So if we're
gonna make it about this other partisan point
that I think anybody on us can say
is actually completely illegitimate,
well, that that creates the left right divide.
That creates the the left going after Republicans
because of their
same point as always, by the way. Can
you are you now can you go back
to the point where you recognize that you're
being unjustly called an anti Semite for wearing
red hat, and then turn around, recognize they're
doing that they're aiming you at the others
and doing the same damn thing?
Same thing, guys.
The point though is that we'll wait and
see. I I would be and maybe it
won't even happen at all. It's all words.
It's all words. Words mean nothing until we
see the outcome.
But
it's still Donald Trump shot, and I think
that's important to consider that won't be acknowledged.
Here's another example that's
wild. As you guys know, Thomas Massie was
pushed aside.
Uncommon Sense says this is who replaced Thomas
Massie on the rules committee.
Here's what she says.
Eyes today to support prime minister Netanyahu
in the just cause of eliminating Hamas.
Soon, the prime minister will address the people's
house.
As he speaks, he will we will be
reminded of the mounting peril facing America
and our allies around the world.
In the struggle for freedom and democracy
against antisemitism
and terror, the committee on education and the
workforce
is proud to do its part.
We've held count
North Carolina, by the way, if that seems
relevant to you.
Antisemitism
with terror. We gotta fight the terror.
I mean, get this there's a reason this
person's there. Okay? Somebody who by the way,
just I
But it doesn't mean they don't know that
they're lying, by the way. But I just
think it's incredible that we're watching somebody like
Massi, who actually cares about this country, at
least more so than I can see than
anybody else, at least on paper with the
action,
and put somebody in position that comes right
out and says, Netanyahu,
pro fight terror, anti Semitism. I mean, it
is ridiculous.
They are not on your side.
I don't know why Republicans aren't I mean,
I think
it's the same thing. I'm just flabbergasted every
time by why this continues to go forward
and why we don't see a waterfall
of pushback by people that see what's happening.
These hearings exposing the roots of anti semitism
on the home front and will continue So
That means persecuting Americans for speech.
That's what she's talking about. To do so.
The success of this vital mission will help
decide whether America remains safe for the Jewish
people.
Oh my god.
I mean, it's just so I think think
about making this the focus with what's going
on even in this country.
Despite how many times over we've proven, even
studies have proven. Like, it
Greenblatt was caught himself
for simply calling every Palestinian
flag or protest an anti Semitic incident. That's
where the whole number comes from. The whole
400%, the whole dark cloud, and then we
go on to watch them fake all sorts
of things.
And yet people like this can keep toeing
the line.
As Ronald Reagan once said
Oh, good. Freedom is never more than 1
generation away from extinction.
His words ring especially true today.
Not since World War 2 have the stakes
felt
so high.
I wanna rewrote that speech for her.
I simply said, what people are capable of
ignoring to support their side is astounding.
So Thomas Massie gets pushed aside after he
calls out APAC, after he clearly is not
blind after he chooses not to vote in
the interest of what they just did. At
least he he said was present, but he
didn't vote yes.
Nonetheless,
as a actual America first action, he gets
pushed aside. Now does that represent what you
think is American interest?
Or is that a group influencing
who's in position whether or not they act
in Israel's interest?
I think you are smart enough to make
that make that case for yourself. Here's what
com comrade Misty said. Funny how the Trump
admin hyped Massie up, which they did, to
garner favor with the libertarians and now and
are now kicking him to the curb. Who
could have possibly seen that coming?
Like all the rest that we saw. Right?
Where they
Ron Paul, Thomas Massie. Why do you think
they did that? So then people would go
see he's gonna change everything. I hope so.
But clearly, that's not what's happening.
Kylie Jane Kremer says, Justin, speaker Johnson has
been has removed Thomas Massie.
Johnson, you know, the one that also is
totally on your side. Spending bill. He's the
enemy. Trump's gonna see it. He'll remove him.
Oh, now he's picked. He's our guy.
Not all conservatives, mind you, but the team
sport politics. Sal Agera says, Trader Johnson has
removed the only America First congressman from the
rules committee. Remind me again why MAGA insists
on empowering this s bag?
Chuck says because we trust Trump and we
trust his plan for the future.
That's not a joke.
1 of these put the same kind of
image, you know?
Think about that. This is the mindset, guys,
that we trust him and we trust his
vision for the future with an Israeli flag
in their bio.
That's just I mean, trusting a politician is
literally the stupidest thing we could talk about.
They could be wrong. They could be lying.
They could change their mind, which is all
too often what happens. But you just trust
it because if he changes mind, well, trust
that too. That means you're a follower.
Even with that famous quote,
This is from it pops up easy now
since I've referenced in the past.
Theodore Roosevelt,
to announce that there must be no criticism
of the president or that he that we
are to stand by the president right or
wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but morally treasonable to the American people.
Think about that.
That is what we're dealing with right now.
People are blindly,
blindly
Oh, that's crazy.
Hold on.
Oh, I just removed it.
I thought it was the exact same date
last year that I anyway, it doesn't matter.
The point is clearly,
trusting him is exactly what they're talking about
right here. Blind acquiescence.
That's, as he says, servile. Morally treasonable to
the American people.
That's who these people are. Sal Agger says,
slave mentality.
And this person making a joke, he's a
he's an a agerist, says,
get in the boxcar, Libtard. It's 40 chess.
It's perfect. Kinda the kinda stupid spot response
you tend to get.
Now, Glenn Greenwald
highlighting Johnson being asked about California.
Right? Wildfires. People suffering. Right?
As we already just showed you, the same
people that were just screaming bloody murder, rightly
so, about the fact that they were not
giving enough aid to people in North Carolina
are now going, well, woah. We don't we
gotta put conditions on this. We gotta make
sure California
does things before we give them any aid.
Meanwhile, people suffer. See how that works? Your
government hates you. It doesn't matter what side,
as long as they keep you thinking it's
only the other half, it all keeps going.
But, of course, the people that were 30
seconds ago going, look at them and what
they're doing to North Carolina are going, well,
it makes sense because California Democrats, they know
what they're doing.
That, I just can't stress enough, is not
most people.
All of you out there, whatever side you're
on, call it out because you're being lied
to.
He says, Mike Johnson thinks there should be
conditions on aid to California,
but, of course, not aid to Israel while
they're committing a genocide. Because he made that
clear. No conditions. All of them said that.
We must support them no matter what.
But, of course, if you live in this
country and you just suffered an emergency, we
have to make sure that they do what
we want first before we give you what
you need.
America first though. Right? Keep screaming it. Maybe
it'll come true.
Are you the focus for buying a
out
and conditions at all?
I think we've got to have a serious
conversation about that. Obviously, there's been
water resource mismanagement,
forest,
management
mistakes, all sorts of problems.
And it it does come down to leadership,
and it it appears to us that state
and local leaders were airlifted in their duty
in in many respects.
So that's something that has to be,
factored in. I think there should probably be
conditions on that, aye. That's my personal view.
We'll see what the consensus is. I haven't
had a chance to socialize that with any
of the members over the weekend. We've all
been very busy, but it'll be part of
the discussion for sure. What about the and
that's been
talked about by more than one person. Right?
Conditions on the aid.
Simple.
And unless they do what they want, they
won't get it. That's very simple. Now, I
don't disagree
with the idea that this needs to change.
But as I've just showed you a second
ago, actually, I think I might even have
let's see if I have that saved.
The image that was we shared,
or the not image, but the, the little
video that we put out in regard to
the money from
California. Now, to be clear on that point,
by the way, I'm pretty sure I can
find it here real quick.
What's interesting to me
how is that not there? What's interesting to
me is that the
point I was making was not to say
explicitly that somebody clearly just misunderstood or, you
know, because they're usually doing that. Doesn't matter
who they are. The point is that I
wasn't explicitly saying that because this money was
given to them that's connected to the fire.
I simply said that this the overlap of
water management clearly has relevance to the conversation
of the fire. But there's a 1,000 other
issues about malfeasance that are immediately clear.
My point was simply to highlight that both
administrations, Trump and Biden, have been dumping 1,000,000,000.
I think it was over $5,000,000,000
over 2 administrations
for water infrastructure.
And yet, nonetheless, we still continue to have
water infrastructure problems. All I'm showing you is
a constant
constant profiteering
government, Moutheastern situation
that's not unique to one side or the
other.
Now I don't seem to see this in
here for some reason, which I don't know
why since we just
covered
this. Nope. That's not the one. Oh, well.
That is so strange. I feel like we
just posted this. It was just the the
series of,
of different pages from California
EPA money going toward them.
I'm just not seeing it here. Let me
one more quick search.
Something will pop up pretty quick.
But the the the for those who don't,
remember it, the bottom line was simply that
it was I mean, every year and it
started with 2010,
but then mostly went 2016 all the way
through 2024.
And it was just every sing I mean,
multiple times a year, $300,000,000,
$400,000,000.
There it is.
So back to the point.
This is the kind of money that's been
dumped in there. Like, to to to make
to somewhat make what he's saying. Right? So
to be clear,
you can see here, just kinda quickly going
through all the different money.
95,000,000,
a 108,000,000,
500,000,000,
500,000,000 again, 600,000,000. It goes over and over.
67,000,000,
$5,000,000,000
over that much just for water infrastructure. That's
just an incredible thing to realize.
And where's it all gone?
So my point is, yes, there obviously needs
to be changed, but I what I'm keep
what I keep highlighting is that they don't
care about it. Neither side does. They haven't
for for multiple administrations.
So now it's about something different. But none
and, of course, the moment they decide to
care is when they're withholding aid from people
that need it. Now, obviously, if you wanna
make sure people don't suffer, well, then you
would give aid for the people that need
it and then deal with California, but that's
not what's happening. So it's it's hypocritical.
And it shows you that your government is
one thing,
but a little different flavor depending on how
they present it.
Now, as Whitney said, in regard to Thomas
Massie being kicked aside, after being fake fielded
as a potential cabinet pick due to his
popularity with the populist right,
the continued sidelining of Thomas Massie both in
politics and by big right leaning influencers should
be pretty revealing. And where things are headed
politically with the incoming administration.
There may be people I think it was,
what's alpha or what was his name? Oh,
it's DC Draino and Cat Curd, I guess,
went on a whole thing about how he's
so stupid and immature.
Really, really. Like, these people screaming America First
and you're trying to gaslight about somebody who
clearly is more in line with what you
pretend you care about than anybody else in
the administration. But he's the one. Right? They're
just protecting their brand, guys.
Now, on the point I was making before,
to where I clearly see this all going
is I think right now, as we get
into the conversation of the ceasefire,
I believe that we're being manipulated in in
ways that are my law I guess, my
my larger view on this, I'll show you
this in a second. I'll
just make a point,
Is that I'm concerned, put it that way,
that what you're what is happening right now
is basically a coordination with Netanyahu and Trump.
And about trying to present the illusion that
ultimately he is anti Netanyahu. What I just
I mean, think about it like this. It's
obviously possible that Trump has deviated his changed
position, that he suddenly recognizes an interest, let's
say, in calling out Netanyahu. I would never
say that's not possible.
But right now, we got we have words.
The c star deal,
if it happens, seems like if the first
action that might represent a positive step. My
point though is that what you have decades.
Let's just take his last administration all the
way to the now. Years
years of evidence that he is so openly
pro Netanyahu and pro Israel
more than anybody, it seems.
So that is evidence. That's real action. Over
and over and over, he's proven that. And
met and Miriam Adelson, the funding, 100 and
1,000,000 of dollars right up until now. I
mean, over and over and over. And then
you got him saying a little bit different
thing now. Or posting a cryptic video that
seems to only point out Obama, bad net,
and Yahoo though. And they all jolly knew
it. Well, you're ignoring
years of evidence of action versus just a
little floated idea. I'd like to believe it.
I'm considering that's gonna happen. My point though
is that an honest person would go, probably
not, until we see something that actually happens.
And so what I'm pointing out here is
that as we're gonna go through this conversation,
a lot of little indications are being floated.
For example, this hasn't happened yet, but it
says Lanier Post, of course, who I is
very clearly in the Zionist direction says, imam
who refused to call Hezbollah terrorist organization scheduled
to deliver a benediction at Trump's inauguration.
Honestly, my gut would tell me it probably
is not even true. Who knows? Wouldn't surprise
me though. Because, honestly, I think that would
be a very clear tactic
to present the idea that you are not
pro Israel even though you obviously are in
everything you do, policy and action, everything.
Interesting. Right? But just a thought. And if
it does happen and maybe he is not
pro Israel. Maybe he's gonna I'm always I'm
not saying we can prove this. I'm saying
that my concern, which, by the way, if
you look at our track record, is more
often than not right, is that this is
about trying to play you. And this might
even be just a floated idea that has
been rapidly these things have turned out not
to be true. But this person says, what
is going on with Trump? This person's pro
Israel, saying first he pressures Israel into surrendering
to Hamas, which has not happened yet. Then
he invites a Hezbollah Amam to his inauguration,
which has just floated, hasn't happened yet as
far as I could tell. His Middle East
envoy praised Cutter, which, by the way, Cutter
has been working with Israel on their their
housing the Hamas leadership. It's not that's not
accurate, by the way. But he goes, he
has gone
mask off here. So see, they're trying to
insinuate that he secretly has always hated Israel.
That's qanon right there. He goes, he used
his Jewish proxies and threw them in the
garbage.
Maybe. How about we wait and see? How
about we wait for action?
Now, I wanna start with this clip. Now,
keep that in your mind. I'll make many
more points like that as we finish with
this. The main point we're gonna finish with
right now, the rest of the show is
gonna be about the ceasefire.
The the potential deal.
This is interesting because this is I wanna
make this point to start this as we
get into some Israel conversation.
This is a clip from the one of
the state department,
employees that resigned. You'll recognize him. I'll probably
play that clip of him in the later
in the show.
What's important about this is he's expressing an
opinion that I think is really important to
consider
that I credit to, Dave Smith, who said
this really early in the conversation in a
very important discussion
that I really do think was a very
really important time to make this case. And
I I do I think this is a
one of the most important points in this
conversation that he made really early.
Well, I'll let this play first, then I'll
and I'll add my my point to it.
Are people
who might argue that this isn't a time
for debate, particularly
in those immediate days in the aftermath
of October 7th? I would argue exactly the
opposite. I think the moment of October 7th
was a moment of incredible worldwide solidarity with
Israel.
And had Israel
leveraged that moment to press for a real,
just, and lasting peace, I think we would
be in a very different place now in
which Israel would not be facing this increasing
isolation around the world and in which its
hostages would be free.
Think about
that. Right? So what what the way that
they pretty much the same way. Dave said
this, I think it was, like, the first
couple of weeks after October 7th.
And it it really was a powerful point.
He said simply that if look. If you
had if Israel had in that moment right?
So Hamas does what they did. They take
people back Regardless of anything else that happened,
let's say, Hannibal directive at all. Right? They
then stood back and said, look.
You know, in a completely
alternative universe where they actually care about human
life, decided to say, look. We should take
this opportunity
to show the Palestinian people, not Hamas, mind
you, because in this dynamic, there's still Hamas
bad guy even though they funded them until
October 7th. The idea being that we should
show the Palestinian people that we actually care
about their future.
Right? And then we'll show them that Hamas
is not in your interest. What we would
do is come out and and give you,
for the first time, mind you, an actual
two state solution.
Literally give them their own state, their own
territory, their own airspace, their government, everything. Not
give it to them, but allow them the
freedom to do that.
That's the actual Tuesday solution that Israel has
on record
ever since the beginning of this, sabotaged, which
we're gonna only talk about more getting into
the ceasefire now.
And, again, you guys are you're gonna get
Zionist that will push back on everything about
stuff. It's all documented. Going back as far
as you wanna look, including the atrocity propaganda
they pretend happened in October 7th, which we'll
get into that too. But the point, clearly,
if they if they would have said, we'll
make this deal now. We'll show the world
that we don't want this anymore like they
pretend is the case. Right? We'll give you
that territory. We'll break apart. The the conversation
becomes Israel. Like, as he said in the
video, after October 7th, there was a waterfall
of support for Israel.
If they would have gone to the United
Nations immediately
and said this was a terrorist attack,
we are being persecuted,
the world, they would have never ever, for
the rest of their existence, mind you, probably
had to ever ask for anything else again.
Because the point is people would have been
like, you're right. You just proved to us
what you've been telling us. We are being
attacked. These are terrorists. And they said, but
even though that's the case, we still want
to present this deal to the Palestinians. They
I mean,
even if they immediately after that went back,
that would change the perception of what Israel
is forever,
especially considering how locked down the propaganda was
before they shot themselves in the foot.
And you add that that crown jewel of
showing look look what we did for them.
We gave it to them in spite of
a terrorist attack that would have they would
have changed the world.
But they don't want that, you see. They
wanna change it in a way that gives
them absolute control and decimates the Palestinian people.
So instead, they went immediately full genocide expecting
the world to follow along.
I just think it's an incredibly powerful point
because it demonstrates 2 things. 1, they don't
actually want that outcome. They don't want the
2 state solution. They never have. And I
think that's been proven
way more realized that since October 7th, many
of them have explicitly stated that. Ben Gavir,
Smotrich, they've said they're never gonna happen. It
was never gonna happen. They're clear about that.
Western media and politicians just lie to you.
It's simple.
But I think that's important to consider.
So as he's highlighting the same thing. Had
they actually gone the right direction, this would
have been over and Israel would have never
had to ask for a thing again. They
would have had monumental support forever. Instead, they
chose to murder children.
Now keeping that in mind,
ask yourself now why this might change.
So, obviously, there are plenty of possible reasons
why they might decide to go, well, we're,
you know, we're losing or we we we
can't do this very long. We wanna take
a break or, you know, but whatever. But
they might decide to finally agree to a
deal that they have been pushing back on
from the beginning.
One of the main points we'll make is
that this was the same exact deal,
exactly the same deal that Hamas already agreed
to back in May. And I'll prove that
to you because of of the the document
shared by a journalist on Twitter.
So ask yourself how that makes sense. Why
would Israel act like they never agreed even
though we know they did, and then fight
later present the same deal now?
Well, we don't know yet. We'll have to
see how this plays out. Right? But let
me go through some important information. Now first
of all,
this is Gaza. Okay? One place, but realize
this is what Gaza looks like right now.
Okay? It is absolutely decimated. And Israel's own
maps and bombing locations show you. They bombed
everywhere including every safe zone they've ever pointed
out. Okay.
So if this deal goes to pass and
they actually get to go back, what does
that even mean?
To back the what?
Everything's gone. There's no working hospitals. I mean,
other than shells of rooms that they still
work as some kind of, you know, what
do you call it? Like, a tent in
a in a in a middle of a
war. Like, they they could use any at
this point, they've been so designated. They're just
using these locations for shelters and trying to
do what they can.
There's no water infrastructure. They've made sure of
that. There has been for a long time.
But now they have no homes. They have
no shelter. They and this is obvious. Now
Now even if you wanna pretend they're just
gonna bring in what they need, there's no
way you can do that for everybody at
once, especially even if you actually did what
they're claiming they're gonna do. And I'll make
these points in a second.
So ask yourself what that means
if Israel has already won.
Right? That they have decimated the entire area
and that the Palestinians are completely
I mean, they've killed over half the population,
guys. So what does it mean? And will
they not then go, what? Now what? Now
they're suffering. Quick. Everybody has to help them.
Bring them to other countries or whatever. They
they're gonna use the feigned
support to roll it into the same agenda
they always have. That's what I believe.
But considering that Gaza's gone, it might change
your perception on how this looks.
So
according to
this is Associated Press, really, reported through through
Toronto Times. Israel and Hamas agree to ceasefire
deal. Now, right out of the gate, that
seems to be inaccurate, seeing as how right
now it still has to be approved by
Netanyahu, and that hasn't happened yet unless it
happened since I've been live.
Agreed to the ceasefire deal to pause, so
not a ceasefire, war and release some hostages.
Well,
right now, that already does not seem like
anything other than a half step like we've
been seeing the entire time.
Right?
So here's what it says.
Again, pause, raising the possibility of winding down.
That's our that's how it's being presented right
now, not an actual
end point.
That may come if this gets to stage
2 and then actually then goes through all
the way. But it says the deal coming
after weeks of painstaking negotiations on the Qatari
capital promises the release of dozens of hostages
held by Hamas in phases, The release of
thousands of Palestinian prisoners in Israel. So right
away, let's not you know how long they've
been trying to pretend like they don't have
tens of thousands of illegal detain illegal prisoners
in Israel?
You know, there are a lot of things
coming out through this deal right now that
are exposing lies they've been carrying the entire
time. Like a lot of things we've already
shown you because they're liars.
But it says the release of 100 of
Palestinian prisoners that they've used to pretend weren't
there and would allow 100 of thousands of
people displaced in Gaza to return
to what remains of their homes.
It also would flood badly needed humanitarian aid
into the devastated con territory. Oh, you mean
the aid that now you can flood? Oh,
I get it. So you totally were restricting
the aid, which we already knew. But what
this proves, and I'll make it even more
clear,
is that they were. If they can just
go, now the aid comes in perfectly. Well,
okay. If the argument was Hamas was stealing
it all, why now can you flood it
with aid that now gets to them? Oops.
But they know this, guys. It's not a
secret. The world already knows they're lying. The
only people we're convincing are people that are
only listening to corporate media and government politicians.
I'm telling you guys, this is a crazy
story where the vast majority of the entire
world is not even mincing words on how
clear it is that Israel's starving them, Israel
is stopping the deals, Israel is committing genocide.
It's the world's clearly seeing this.
That's objective, I think. It's very obvious.
It says the 3 officials from the US
and one from a mosque confirmed that a
deal had been reached. Why while a senator,
a senior Israeli official said the details are
still being ironed out. See my point? This
is exactly like, I'm hoping it'll get past
this point
just for the sake of maybe giving some
time to these people to maybe get something,
you know, maybe not starve to death.
Is the idea that this I mean, my
point my point is I hope it does.
But what this shows you is that every
time before, this is how it goes, the
US and Blinken go around going, we're waiting
on Hamas.
Or in this case, that we've confirmed the
deal, but Israel speaks to the public and
goes, no. We haven't. We're still working on
some details. Well, if they're telling you the
US
and Hamas are saying we've worked it out
and Israel is saying we're still working on
details, well, that's not finished then.
But they're already pretending it is. It gets
much worse than this. It goes on to
say any agreement still needs to be approved
by Netanyahu. That's not even what I mean.
That's also worse, but we're gonna get to
it. Netanyahu's cabinet, but it's expected to go
into effect in the coming days. So it
hasn't even happened yet. So you're getting all
this conversation from people that one of 1,
praise Trump, and say he did it. Hasn't
happened yet. Not even I mean, just the
deal itself is there, but Netanyahu, just like
he's done every time before,
could decide to throw it in the trash.
But on top of that, people that are
pro Israel wanna make it out to see
him that they care and it's always some
boss bad guy. Either way, so far, we're
right where we've always been. Now it says
the deal is expected to deliver an initial
6 week halt to fighting that is to
be a comp accompanied by opening of negotiations
on ending the world together. A point somebody
will make in in Haraz
is if they really wanted to do this,
they wouldn't just they would just do it.
This stage dynamic is guarantee he argues, is
guaranteed that shows that Netanyahu plans to sabotage
it in the 2nd phase.
It's a good point. But it goes other
6 over 6 weeks, 33 of nearly a
100 hostages will be re reunited with their
loved ones
after months in captivity with no contact with
the outside world, though it is unclear if
they're all alive. Well, we know that's the
cases that they've been killed by Israel. Again,
it's one of these points that have been
openly admitted by other hostages.
But I guess we'll pretend like it's fake
news because we supposed to protect Israel all
the time even at the expense of the
truth.
And it says it remained unclear exactly when
and how many displaced Palestinians would be able
to return to what remains of their homes
and whether the agreement would lead to a
complete end to the war. Right. So what
if they go back and start rebuilding their
homes, and then it doesn't end it? They
get bombed again. Like this
everything about this is wrong.
Whether or not they make this deal. I
mean, this is one thing I worry about
is that when they say make the deal,
is there gonna be any accountability for the
genocide they've committed?
I think you now you damn well know
that that won't happen through any of these
administrations. So that's something the world has to
push for. But this
will be a way, if it happens, to
purse pretend like they're we it was just
a war and now we're paused. Not that
they've been committing genocide, an objective murder.
They've been starving people. They've been ethnically cleansing.
They have been poisoning. They have been using
chemical weapons. They have I mean, on and
on and on.
And it says, and the full withdrawal of
Israeli troops.
Key Hamas demands for releasing the remaining captives.
So, basically, the point becomes if they don't
first remove from the area, Hamas will say,
well, we're waiting to release the people until
you remove. That's the agreement. But just like
last time, Israel will say, well, we're not
gonna do it until you release the people,
and they pretend it's Hamas' fault. Even though
the deal clearly states what comes first.
Many many and, of course, the blankets of
the world lie for Israel every time. Many
longer term questions about post war Gaza remain,
including who will rule the territory.
Isn't that crazy? So we're literally pretending like
this is gonna go through when Israel has
the the one thing over all the others
they have always maintained is that Hamas can't
be in control. And then we go here.
There's a lot of very clear signs this
is not gonna come to pass. I hope
it does.
Now,
a Asa from the,
electronic intifada
breaks down in a very concise way the
the kind of process of how it's supposed
to go. And I'll show you this right
now. What it's highlighting, guys, this is from
May 6th.
K? This is the full text of the
ceasefire agreement that Hamas has accepted.
Go through and look at this. It is
identical
to the current plan.
Stupid. Right? So the bottom line is he
says, below is the full text of the
draft Gaza ceasefire agreement currently being negotiated. A
phased prisoner exchange and full Israeli withdrawal from
Gaza. Media reports today all say Hamas has
accepted it. It is the same deal which
Hamas already accepted in May 2024. It is
literally right there. Included in the show notes
for you or will be when I'm done.
And which the genocidal Biden admin
repeatedly lied about.
Every time this has happened. Every single time.
That's what and if you remember the article
we covered, even from Times of Israel,
Hamas on October 9th 10th, right out of
the gate, were openly ready to accept a
full withdrawal and full exchange
right in the beginning.
And every time, Israel said no because what
they wanted was to extinct this population. They
wanted to murder everybody in Palestine.
Now it says, phase 1. This is how
it's supposed to go. Assuming Netanyahu says it's
okay, which is a big if,
Temporary suspension
of military operations.
Withdrawal of Israeli forces east away from the
densely populated areas to an area along the
border in all areas of Gaza Strip.
Temporary suspension of air activity, this is just
phase 1, in the Gaza strip for 10
hours a day. So right there to
me, and it says, and for 12 hours
in the days have released prisoners.
So what? They're gonna I mean, of course,
the point is suspension of military operations. But
if they're still flying jets over this for
some hours of the day, I'm willing to
bet you you're gonna see some bombings, that
they're gonna pretend it didn't happen or claim
they were shot at. It happens every single
time.
Now if you're if you
it's pretty clear that I expect this stuff
to work, and that's not again, it's like
the conversation we had before. You've got a
year of nonstop precedent of them showing you
what they're capable of, what they'll do in
this exact situation.
So a smart person, an honest person, would
say this is probably how it's gonna go
with hope that it might go better. That's
where we should be. To pretend that it
because they said it, it's gonna happen now
is falling for the same old trick. Every
time. They've said the same thing every time
and led blinking his light every time, and
every time we've proven it. And here we
are again. Right? So just that's the balance
you should have. That clearly, we should be
expecting the the bad while hoping for the
good. Because that's what the evidence shows.
But it says air, and then the return
of the displaced people to their areas of
residence.
Okay. Will that include every single location?
Even those little carve outs they've got? Like,
if they don't write that explicitly, Israel will
play stupid.
Now it says starting from the first day,
still on phase 1, intensive and sufficient quantities
of humanitarian aid, relief materials, and fuel. And
get this, guys. In the actual deal,
600 trucks a day, including 50 fuel trucks,
including 30 for the north.
Right. The thing that they claim was, you
know, they the point is that's exactly what
we've been saying from day 1, that over
5 500 a day was what was happening
before, and I'll show you this in a
second. And they were already food insecure. They
went down to basically 0 for the 1st
2 weeks and then have barely gone over
a 100 the entire time. They're starving people.
It's objectively obvious. They claim Hamas did this,
and Hamas did that. It's been proven by
everybody, even their own videos, the stupid people
they are, that they're blocking aid.
And now, all of a sudden, they make
a deal. And in the deal, they agree
to the thing that they claim has always
been happening. Think about how dumb that is.
Because it hasn't been, and they know that.
They've been proving it.
So suddenly, it is possible. Now the second
point is when that does get there, if
this happens,
ask yourself why Hamas didn't take it all.
Or ask yourself the point oh, you could
say they made the deal and it's okay.
The point is that this is all a
big narrative, guys. They're lying about all of
it. This has always been possible. They've always
been blocking it. I'll prove this to you
in a second.
During the first phase,
Hamas released 33 Israeli detainees. That's what's supposed
to happen. Alive or dead.
And we're gonna get into the the b
bus overlap in a second too. Hamas releases
all of the living Israeli detainees.
In return, Israel releases 30 children and women
for every Israeli detainee released.
Now you got some of them are gonna
try to make a point that I think
is really hilarious to me about how clearly
Hamas thinks their people matter more than Jews
as they're trying to say. Despite how every
single deal before this has been,
we need
10 Israelis for 1 we'll give you one
one Palestinian.
Going on to make explicit cases for why
their people matter more. And now, because it
says the opposite they take Zionists are so
lazy. They take every opportunity to lie to
you, even though it's so easy to prove
that they're know they're lying. I'll show you
in a second. The point here is that
they're saying now for the first Israel releases
30 children
for every Israeli detainee released. And the reason
that makes sense is because they held
way more people.
That's they all know that. They just don't
want you to know that. They hold there
are it was 10,000 plus the last time
we knew. That's in Israel's illegal detention centers.
Right? We're talking like a 100 people over
here, and so we're gonna pretend like they
it's obvious why that makes sense. But going
on, it says Israel releases 30 elderly prisoners
over 50 years in the next phase. Then
Hamas
releases all female Israeli recruits who are alive.
In return, Israeli releases
50 prisoners from its prisoners in exchange for
every Israeli female recruits. Same reason. Makes perfect
sense.
All of which, by the way, are not
hostages.
They are IDF members. They are detainees. They
are POWs.
You're gonna see another argument about how, don't
let them prick you. They're all hostages. And
they go on to show you the one
example of the Biba's family who they've already
killed by bombing, which we're gonna find out
soon. But it says on the 1st day
of the agreement, Hamas will release 3 Israeli
civilians,
hostages.
On the 7th day of the agreement, Hamas
will release 4 other Israelis. Now here's what's
interesting. There's a lot of the ways they
could try to, like, make this out to
be they failed. Like, first of all,
how about what if these people are all
dead because they bombed them? Israel will claim
they killed them, and they'll claim they just
they violated the ceasefire. You already know how
that works. Even though we've proven as other
hostages have admitted that Israel has been killing
them or shot them point blank more than
once in Gaza.
But in this case, the point is
civilian hostages. Well, what if there are no
civilian hostages? What if they're all IDF members,
which is pretty much the case?
Will will it be the first time they
admit that to make the ceasefire fail? I'm
just thinking outside the box here. It says
after that, Hamas will release 3 additional Israeli
inductees every 7 days. So why would you
do it like this? Why wouldn't you just
have an exchange?
It says in the 6 weeks in the
6th week
now you have 6 weeks of time frame
where any small thing that Israel wants to
trip it up will say they did this
or just lie about it. Or how about
they do what they've been doing for 76
years and just lob a rocket at themselves
and say, look. It landed in a field.
Hamas bad guy. Over. They've done it every
time.
In the 6th week, Hamas will release all
remaining civilian detainees including at included at this
stage.
Now now it says all the way down
here. We haven't even got to phase 2
yet.
It says, Palestinian prisoners who will be released.
Now there's other stuff in here, by the
way, that I'm just kind a lot of
this stuff is really up in the air
that, like, I kinda just think it's not
even worth getting into until we see some
beginning phase. But it says Palestinian prisoners who
will be released again will not be arrested
on the same charges as on which they
were previously arrested. Again,
proving to you what we already reported, that
they simply released all these people and then
scooped them all back up. In fact, I
proved to you that they released these people,
and and and in fact, 2 things. They
were arresting like crazy the weeks before this,
then they released some of the ones they
said they would, and
they arrested more than they released in the
weeks following. We proved that. And and the
same people. So it was all a big
ruse.
And so now they're admitting that. Oh, well,
okay. Fine. We'll agree. Not I mean, it's
like that clip John, Caraku was just saying.
I played it. It's a 10 minute clip.
Where they literally are harassing and and cutting
the the tails off dogs of agents of
the United States in Israel. He just talked
about it. They did that just to mess
with them. Had to go in there as
the state department and say, hey. Stop messing
with our guys. And they go, okay. Okay.
Okay. And then go right back to it
a week later.
Stealing Christmas presents.
I mean, small things, but then the the
idea that they literally cut the tail off
a dog of an agent that was there.
And wrapped it up in gauze and left
it for them. Like, these are psychopaths, guys.
If you don't know that, we just played
that clip. It's horrifying. He's a former agent.
But the point here,
they're admitting what they're doing. They know they're
doing it. They go, okay. Fine. Fine. Now
we won't do it this time. And I'm
probably sure they will. But it goes, and
the Israeli side will not take the initiative
to rearrest them. Same point.
To be released,
to rearrest the Palestinians, release to serve the
remainder of their sentence. Why would you have
to say that? See how dishonest they are?
They would release these people knowing they would
just scoop them back up? Because they don't
hold these things. They have signed the agreement
and then do whatever they want.
Palestinian prisoners to be released will not be
required to sign any documents. Now, what that's
about is what I've been telling you for
a long time now. They're forcing these people
to sign documents that
that gives up their rights to return.
You know, the same thing they pretend is
a fake story, but they make them sign
documents about it.
So understand, UNRWA was created to facilitate
their return to their original territory. Because that's
the legal reality of international law. You're supposed
to be able to return to the territory
that was occupied during a war because we
we pretend the governments aren't there to take
territory. They're just fighting for their freedom. And
the point is once it's done, you're allowed
to go back to your territory. But, no,
Israel is a colonial
entity just like the United States and is
simply taking and taking and taking. Lebanon, Syria,
everything. Egypt.
So they never let them go back. Always
pretending like they wanted to, but bad guy
Hamas that they were funding. The point is
clear that they made this the reality. So
what they're highlighting here is that we won't
find we won't force them to sign contracts
that give up their right to go back
to their home
because we've been doing that the entire time
while telling the world that that's a fake
story. And why should and Tom Cotton goes,
why should we give them aid?
Because they've been displaced for 76 years.
Whether he knows it or not is irrelevant
because Tom Cotton's a moron. And it goes
on to say,
no later than the 6th 16th day,
indirect negotiations between the two sides will begin
on the agreement on the terms of the
implementation of the second phase of the agreement.
So
once they get past that, which is a
hell of a lot of things that could
trip them up, then they begin to negotiate
about how they will see a real end
to this.
I really hope we get there.
Agreements on this issue must be reached before
the end of the 5th week of the
phase. Now it says start rehabilitating infrastructure.
Now get realize so this is what's crazy
to me. We're talking about what?
What is this? 40 days in,
And that means they've already let people go
back to their homes, in big quotes, and
way down the line is rebuilding infrastructure.
So without warning, wander around for 40 days
with nowhere to live and no infrastructure? Like,
how does it even make sense?
There's nowhere to go. Electricity, water, sanitation. These
things have been bombed deliberately. They have been
tearing up the roads deliberately that because they
want to destroy they wanted to salt the
earth, guys. They wanted to destroy who they
were.
And it says, in all areas of the
Gaza Strip, remove rubble and and rubble. The
point is the rubble,
as we've already highlighted, would it's gonna take
decades to remove, even with the right equipment.
They've already highlighted that. I think it was
decades, years, at the very least.
We we did we covered the article on
the show.
Now it says start implementing the necessary agreements
and plans for the this is fate number
13.
Plans for the comprehensive reconstruction of homes, civilian
buildings, civil infrastructure. Yeah. All of which have
been targetedly destroyed.
Work it how are we confused about that
now? Why would every civilian buildings, every civilian
infrastructure be destroyed? Oh, because Hamas was using
them.
Sure. Are we still pretending that's the case
still? Now it says all actions at this
stage, including the temporary secession of military operations
by both sides,
relief and shelter efforts, troop withdrawal, etcetera,
will continue in the second phase as long
as negotiations continue.
Now we get to phase 2, 42 days
in. A permanent secession of military operations on
all hostile activities.
Okay. Well, what if they pretend something's not
hostile?
Obvious way that they could go in there
and mess around.
Phase 3, 42 days.
Another 42 days to the point.
It says the bodies and remains
of the dead in the possession of both
parties
will be exchanged after reaching and identifying them.
Number 17, the implementation of the plan for
the reconstruction of Gaza Strip for a period
of 3 to 5 years,
including houses, civilian buildings, civilian infrastructure. Compensation for
all those affected will begin under the supervision
of a number of countries and organizations including
Egypt, Qatar, the United Nations. Opening crossings and
allowing the movement of people and goods, the
guarantors are Qatar, Egypt, the United States. Wow.
So many thoughts right there.
Right? Okay.
First point, like I said. 3 to 5
years, how in the f are they gonna
survive and what's going on there? Of course,
that means that everyone's gonna have to provide
everything for them even more, which they'll only
further be painted as people sucking from,
the service, social services,
because that's how they want to make it
out to be because they hate these people.
But they're not. They've been genocided, and they've
been kicked off their land, and they bottom
line is how is that gonna work?
The rebuilding of it all.
The other thing to think about, who's gonna
pay for all this?
You think Israel's gonna pay for it?
I find that impossible to believe.
And then if they do, probably just gonna
use the money that US gives them to
use it. And then probably through that benefit
themselves in every way they can. And probably
poison things and test on them, which they
do every time.
But the bigger thing to think about here,
guys, what about the whole smart city point?
Think about that as Trump and Netanyahu rebuild
Gaza.
Are we are we forgetting that agenda? I
mean, are we forgetting their their plan they
laid out for the smart world of Gaza
City that they wanted to build?
I'm sure Republicans will be screaming about that
as Trump rolls it out. Right?
Now, again, there's so many ways this could
go. But the opening here with the UN
and the other groups with so if you
have Israel, the US, Qatar, and the UN
rebuilding Gaza, what do you think that's gonna
look like? Do you think they have an
interest in working with the people, or do
you have an interest in the larger plan
that Israel is a central part of that
plenty of Republicans ignore,
globalism?
I find that to be pretty interesting.
So all of that to say that we
just really don't know yet and we have
to wait for this to actually happen.
But don't forget, they already agreed to this
back in May and they just kept murdering
people anyway.
Now Almayidine English simply I'll include this. I
just basically made this really simple and quick
and concise. It's simply breaking down the time
frame. You can look at that for yourself.
Now I wanna include these 2 so you
don't forget how this already went more than
once. May 7th, Robert wrote this article. By
the way, Robert's working on an article right
now discussing the ceasefire.
Hamas agrees to ceasefire. Israel attacks Rafa in
response.
That's what they did. They they
agreed to it, and they go,
Rafa, they did attack, and we're we can't
deal with this right now. And they just
kinda pretended like something else happened.
Even though the whole point was blinking, it
was going, all we gotta do is wait
for Hamas. We all saw it. Hamas goes,
fine. We agree. And they go, never mind.
And they do something else.
Every time. And then he wrote about it
again. June 2, 2024. Israel once again refuses
their own ceasefire deal after Hamas accepts.
Like, this is stuff you could look back
on. It's so obvious, the timeline. You can
look at what they were saying, then you
can see Hamas accept, then you can see
them change their narrative. They bank on liars
and Zionist to manipulate Zionist liars and people
who follow along.
August 20, 2024. The US backed ceasefire or
the US backed Gaza ceasefire talks are a
complete sham.
This one is June 9, 2024.
Under guise of ceasefire talks and humanitarian aid,
a joint US Israeli op killed 274
Gaza civilians. Remember that?
There's 2 of those by the way. There's
1 in the hospital and there's 1 on
the pier. Both of which they pretended to
bring an aid and then murdered innocent people.
But that's what that's what we call the
good guys today, guys. Don't forget that. They're
the good guys. Now here is another example.
NBC News. Netanyahu won't agree to hostage release
deal unless the polls it pulls well for
him,
according to Israeli families.
And this is May 2024,
which that was the May deal we just
pointed to. That's why he went, they didn't
they liars and no. He lied. And even
the people in Israel were calling him a
liar, and your western median government still gaslit
for the genocide.
Dan Cohen says he wrote about this because
he was all the way back in January
of 2024. He says, I exposed Netanyahu's deceptions
to prevent a ceasefire a year ago,
including a leaked recording of Netanyahu
lying to hostage families. We talked about this
on the show.
Harrettes and all mainstream media ignored it. Now
that the ceasefire is signed,
they admit it.
Now he says signed, but I'm pretty sure
we're still waiting for Netanyahu. Now I could
be wrong with the timing.
Either way, the timing of where this goes
beyond that is still wildly up in the
air. But his piece is right here for
you to read.
Here's what Harrettes wrote. This is today.
A deal for releasing the hostages has been
on the table for an entire year. And
Netanyahu's
repeatedly scuttled it to preserve his government, which
is dependent upon his criminal alliance with the
KOS right wing. The maniac Zionist party. Like
the religious Zionist party, the the the the
Jewish power party. These people are maniacs.
These are those are the real names by
the way.
Now, I'll shoot share this out and include
you know, funny how that only pops up
when they when it's something they don't want
you to read? They don't do that for
things that they agree with. That funny, meaning
Twitter.
The podcast is that whole thing of do
you wanna read it first, which accidentally click
it when you're trying to retweet it. Happens
all the time.
And here is,
Human Arts Watch. Israel still blocking aid to
civilians in Gaza. There's so much evidence around
this. It's embarrassing. People pretend like it's not.
And, like, all you get is idiots like
Michael Rapaport out there screaming that you're wrong,
because cause that's all they got. That's the
best they've got. Right? John Fetterman and Michael
Rapaport. How do we ever think that was
so much even laughing at how dumb that
looks? I I'll get to my get to
Fetterman in a second. Like, that think how
embarrassing that is to think those are the
people that you go, wait, this is why
we're right. As Fetterman mumbles his words and
and Rappaport to see if you understand what
he's talking about. That's just so embarrassing to
me. Or Elon Levy, for example, who these
people are ridiculous cartoons.
That's the best they got.
Now on the on the actual idea of
the aid itself.
Right? Right? Let's be clear about it. Not
only have they stopped the actual like, well,
that's the aid, first of all.
The actual deal. Right? So the deal has
been sabotaged over and over and over and
over. As we'll show you again that even
Ben Gavir admitted
according to Jerusalem Post. Like, it's amazing what
can be disregarded.
But the aid itself is important too. Right?
That they've been blocking actual aid, because both
those are involved with the deal.
Now here is the United Nations, and this
is the report from January 8th. I just
wanna be clear about this because it has
not even once gone over a 165
in an average
for each for each month. A day, the
average at at most was 165 during April.
They average.
It started where they went basically down to
0, guaranteeing they would rapidly begin to starve.
And then it can it it went up
a little bit and then trickled down rapidly.
Look at this. From August, September, October, November,
December, the highest was 72 trucks a day.
When 500 a day was what they were
getting in 2023, and they were already food
insecure.
Look at this. December 72. January
51 for the 1st week. So I wanna
show you that. And over here, by the
way, check out foods food insecurity,
Telling you, 91%
of the analyzed population is projected to face
high levels of acute food insecurity classified by
the IPC phase 3, which means that's
I think it was phase 5 was famine.
876,000
people in phase 4.
345,000
people in phase 5. Famine level, guys. They
were all starving.
91% of the population are starving according to
the United Nations.
Now this is the most recent one. I'm
not sure why they they kinda truncated it,
but I wanna show you just right here.
Showing in December, it was 72.
Right now, in the 1st week of January,
it's only 51.
This is just the one for
2025 going forward.
Now here,
what I find interesting is another Zionist. I
said now even the Zionist are turning on
each other. And in doing so, once again
revealing that we've been right all along, which
is what the evidence has always shown. That
Israel has been deliberately blocking a deal, including
Netanyahu himself.
Here's Arsen Ostrovsky, the fake human rights lawyer
that I make fun of all the time
because he protect I mean, I'm not saying
he doesn't have credentials, but this guy's out
here screaming the pro genocide docking points. He's
probably pretty sure you shouldn't call him a
human rights lawyer. But he go so he
writes
in regard to the article from Ben about
Ben Gavir. Ben Gavir admits to preventing hostage
deal on numerous occasions.
That's on top of Netanyahu doing the same,
mind you. Arson says, he says it almost
gleefully, proudly without a shred of humanity.
What an utter embarrassment.
Right? You have no moral standing to be
able to call anybody else a shred of
humanity. But he goes, his soul of purpose
expressed exists to troll.
Even and this is a leader in the
in the Israeli government. He goes, even the
hostages,
they cannot they cannot come soon enough that
Ben Gabbir, this stain on our democracy, is
no longer positioned in the Knesset. I think
it's because Arsen's on Netanyahu's side. The point
is Netanyahu did the same damn thing and
you don't see Arsen calling it out. I'll
show you right here. Or wait. Oh, this
is the one we showed you earlier in
general. And I think that was reported
this one's him the leaked docu leaked information
about Netanyahu doing so. Here's Netanyahu won't agree
if it doesn't help him. It's obvious, by
the way.
But this is Zionist attacking Zionists.
I think it's because they're imploding. I think
it's obvious.
Now, in the same one, he put out
another video of him ranting about this. And
here and he goes on to make a
big big point about how the whole all
the lies about what's going on. And then
the fact check basically comes in and says,
in the context of the returning all of
the abductees, during 15 months of military action
in the Gaza Strip, at least 30
who arrived in Gaza alive were murdered or
killed in captivity.
The IDF rescued only 8 abductees. In contrast,
a 117 were returned alive in the deal.
Their own hostages have been continually telling you
that they're being killed by Israel's bombs
over and over and over.
That's what he's trying to lie about. Ryan
Grim says the fact that Ben Gavir can
admit to having blocked hostage deals many times,
and this isn't the end of Paul. His
political career says a lot about the politics
of Israel.
Now lastly
or I guess, well, we have 2.
Kinda the same point. But so here's antiwar.com.
Israel this is on 12th, mind you. So
right now, we're at 15th. But on 12th,
Israel is refusing to commit to a permanent
Gaza ceasefire
as part of the deal.
But could but so that this is important.
They were in the process in Israel, like
they did every time, said we will not
agree to end the war in a ceasefire
conversation.
So what the f are they talking about?
So if the whole point now here's what's
so stupid about this. If they are signing
deals that says at the end of this,
we'll be negotiating a real end,
and their point is, as Netanyahu and Gavir
keep saying, we'll never that's not that we
won't do that. We won't we won't have
a point where we end the war and
Hamas in charge. But they already assigned that,
apparently.
So all this shows you is the inconsistency
as right now, the other Israeli leaders are
saying we're still ironing out details. Apparently, while
other people say that we raised a deal
already.
This is just continuing to show you
that they'll they'll well, we never agreed to
end the whole thing. Well, that's what a
ceasefire means. But they've already done that more
than once.
Glenn and this is the kind of timeline
of this. On 13th,
you get an Israeli
news coverage point that says, stunned like the
true believer he is, Netanyahu proxy laments. We
are the first to pay the price for
Trump's election.
So you got this immediate story that this
was, you know, Trump hurt you know,
basically back or he he betrayed us. It's,
you know, Trump put it against Netanyahu is
what the what they're framing it as.
But I kinda don't I I don't get
the sense that's what happened. I get the
sense that's how this supposed to be framed
because that's in the interest of both Trump's
administration and Israel, which I feel is quite
the same.
But here's what Glenn said. Israel extremists on
television, and I'll show you why I think
that as we go through this part. Israel
extremists on television are blaming Trump for what
they say is the imminent ceasefire deal in
Gaza,
Claiming that Trump forced the deal on Netanyahu
without first letting Israel completely annex northern Gaza
and block all humanitarian aid from entering. That's
what they're saying.
The very thing that you blink in and
everybody that pretend was never happening, they're literally
going, damn it. We can't starve them anymore.
Like, it's just so stupid how clear all
this is.
And, of course, on 14th.
So at a moment when they're already going,
the deal. The deal. We're done. It's gonna
happen. Got they're bombing Gaza.
Mossad commentary highlights bombing central Gaza on the
day they're talking about the ceasefire. That's all
that clear.
So whether you think this is I mean,
for all we know, this could have been
after, which probably wouldn't wouldn't surprise me. Either
way, it shows you them murdering as money
as they can up until they have to
stop.
Does that sound like a group that's going
to actually honor anything?
Now Mohammed Sheikhada makes an a very important
point here. So now we're on 4 January
14th, further into the day. Okay? Israeli media
claims Trump promised to allow Netanyahu to violate
the deal
and resume the war after signing the deal,
which is what's happened every time.
Trump's, quote, gift bag also includes lifting all
sanctions on Israel's spyware,
Pegasus.
Guys, we just talked about this. As Whitney's
been covering for quite a long time. Derek
just covered this.
Here it is.
And there's more than one by the way,
but the most recent one.
Oops.
Hold on. I think I just used one
of these articles or one of these,
yeah. Good. I don't wanna lose that. So
we're here.
Israeli spyware firm NSO Group found liable for
hacks of WhatsApp users. Oh, that was the
other one. That's the second one, actually.
I think that was up here.
Where was that? Here we go.
This is the first one.
And this is important because what's high his
main point is, NSO Group, Pegasus, is that
he says meet the spyware companies, 50% of
which are Israeli,
preparing to unleash their tech during Trump's 2nd
administration.
This overlaps with the AI thing. The the
every I mean, it's all
interconnected right now. And I think this is
the main point, quite frankly. And then he
follows up saying, look. They've even
the Israeli spyware firm has been found liable
for hacks of WhatsApp users. If you read
this, it'll blow your mind. What they're doing
and what they're capable of. I'm not gonna
go into it now. Make sure we talk
about it more
in I've already done this by the way.
Talked about it, but we'll go into it
more in the next show. Overlap that with
AI and nanotech and where it's all going.
But what he's saying is that they also
include this removing of sanctions off Israel's spyware
entities
that are spying on Americans
and the Israeli illegal settlers that are murdering
people and burning children alive and extremists and
allowing their major West Bank land theft. All
these things are being reported by Ynet News.
I'll grab this since I brought it up.
Robert's article about West Bank settlers.
And it's not new after October 7th, but
it's happened a lot since then. Israeli settlers
consistently use arson attacks to burn Palestinians alive.
This is an example of a young baby.
They burned alive in a home and then
chanted according to Times of Israel,
all is on the grill at their parents.
Good people.
Those are the people that Hegseth was talking
to. These are the people that Trump apparently
reporting according to why that news is gonna
remove sanctions from and allow them to take
more West Bank land, which by the way
was the only thing it seems Mariam Adelson
was demanding.
So you starting to see how it's all
very clear and the rest of its narrative?
This person says, Israel media lies consistently. Oh,
that's what that was. So that's why this
one was oh, that's right.
How do I do that?
You're good. Make sure I'm missing something. Oh,
that's okay. It's right there. I doubled it
up. Sorry for the podcast. You know what
I'm talking about.
He says Israeli media lies constantly.
Trump didn't invite Netanyahu to the inauguration, yet
Israel media is saying Netanyahu decided not to
attend. Trump is not going to let Netanyahu
on crap on the term legacy. The point
here is what I think is interesting.
Trump is is that I think we're being
played.
The idea is to present the idea that
they're at odds with each other, why I
don't think that they are.
I think that's what's happening.
In this case, here's the actual article.
So you can read it for yourself. And
it's exactly what he's talking about. A draft
agreement is awaiting Hamas in the coming days,
president-elect his people demand drums, the incoming
president's gift bag, a small church is connected
to Israeli site. Right. That's that's the Pegasus
discussion. I mean, the reality clearly being that
they argue that he is not going to
allow this. Like, this is a a ruse.
It's ruse.
What I'm what what happens all these times
is I'm trying to find the exact spot.
Oh, what's under that picture? There you go.
Because when you translate these on different places,
it tends to change that slightly the translation.
Here we go. Could be like different words
get used in Google versus something else. President
Trump, according to the source of knowledge, has
already promised Netanyahu and minister Ron Drummer that
if they agree to a ceasefire and withdraw
the United forces from Gaza, he will retroactively
support Israel if it decides to fight back
and break the ceasefire.
My god.
I hope it's wrong, obviously.
Now Glenn,
after that, highlights this surge in the conversation.
Now I find this interesting. Now it very
well could be that Ynette's lying or that
the source they have is wrong. Right? But
I find the timing of this. And then
again, the all the history before us that
indicate it's likely this is not the direction.
Right?
Right now it's just narrative.
Is all of a sudden, you get this
bombing, like, everybody saying the opposite of what
that story broke, which is it's not a
surprise to anyone honest or clear eyed, he
says, but it will make the left liberals
utterly confused. Israeli media and Netanyahu's closest allies
are admit adamant that Trump forced them into
a deal.
Probably because that is what they agreed to.
Right? You have to at least pretend like
I forced you so I get a win,
and then I'll secretly back you when you
break that deal. That's how politics works. Now,
I really hope I'm wrong because I do
not want this to continue. But you know
damn well if you're an honest person right
now that that perfectly makes sense with how
politics works and how these people have done
everything before
this. Mohammed says them in in this he
has and this is, again, his post. So
he was he's been covering the evolution of
the conversation. Israeli media is crystal clear. All
it took to get a ceasefire deal done
was pressure from Trump on Netanyahu who folded
immediately. Does that sound like anything we've heard
so far? Or that Netanyahu would fold immediately
when his entire political career is on the
line? That is he might go to prison
if he loses power? That's a that's a
public conversation.
To me, this does not add
up. Now, Mossad commentary, same point as they're
praising bombing number 4, comes in and goes,
it turns out that Trump's threat of the
gates of hell is equivalent to Biden's don't.
Which very quickly turned out to be mainly
putting pressure on us and not his enemies.
Really? Are we really gonna pretend like he
came in and was like, Israel, do what
we need to do because and not Hamas?
I mean, it's light up with anything. Again,
it's all up in the air.
Right now, we don't know. We'll have to
wait how this goes. But to me, I
have a really hard time thinking that lines
up with anything else we know.
But it's always possible somebody strikes a new
path.
But here's another example. Here's an an article
in Harrettes.
Ben Rieff shares this. Herets analyst, Zavib Baril,
the staged ceasefire agreement is a ruse, he
says. The Israeli government has no intention of
progressing to the second stage, which is what
they've done before, And seeks to resume the
onslaught after the first batch of hostages are
released. So they get a win. They get
a few of their hostages back. They get
say, we give some of them back to
them. They got 10,000 in storage. Probably will
arrest them even though they said they wouldn't.
And they can act like a moss broke
it. That'll be a win for them. That'll
give them more time because their people will
let back, I think.
Now here's the article.
The government does not intend to reach the
second stage of the kidnapping deal. And this
is this is the archive, but this is
from her this is from Heretz.
The deal was not yet been signed. Now
this is again, this is today. So it's
like we're getting inconsistencies. Maybe it's happened since
we've been live. But as far as I
can tell, we're still waiting on Netanyahu. But
weirdly, people I think they're just saying signed
because that's what the media's reporting, the deal
has done. But I don't know why anybody
falls for what they claim. He's Blinken and
Biden and everybody and Trump have all lied
about what has happened so far. But it
says and it's still hovering over it. And
for the lives of 33 kidnappers, a sealed
prime minister, a convicted felon who is on
the roll that's that's Ben that's Netanyahu,
is in the role of national security minister.
Oh, well, I guess more than one person
is a a a, convicted felon and unscrupulous
charlatan known as the finance minister. That's funny.
I actually forgot. Both Smotrich and Ben Gavir
are criminals, but their hope now depends on
the muscles of another dark offender who before
entering the White House was able to prove
again that Netanyahu only understands power. Trump openly
threatened to open the gates of hell if
a deal was not reached. And he goes,
they know all of his sections well.
They and we have nothing but to watch
in horror for the moment they come out
of the abyss and carry their dead eyes
to, where they have where I don't know
how that reads. Carry their dead eyes to
us with the question, where have you been
so far? I don't know what that means.
Anyway, the point is,
in their opinion, right now, this is all
about presenting the idea,
but really put the plan to break off
because it benefits both of them. I mean,
you know that makes sense. It very much
clearly does make sense because it does benefit
both of them. But we'll have to wait.
Now, doctor Yara,
Hawari says Israeli media is now reporting. And
there's more than 1. Like I said, there
this is beginning to overshadow the conversation of
Trump forced us and bad guy. It says
the Israeli media is reporting that the Israeli
government is already planning to resume the bombardment
after phase 1. Of the ceasefire is completed
and the hostages have been returned. The Israeli
playbook is to violate ceasefire agreements because it
knows it enjoys full impunity.
That's from that I mean, guys, this is
just a non stop reality. So, historically, that
is accurate. But if other Israeli media reporting
probably what Ben Gavir and Smotra, because they
always come out and say, screw that. We
don't care. We're gonna go right back to
it. We're never gonna resign.
And so then they go, well, here's what
the media say. Here's what the government say.
It seems pretty clear this is a highly
likely possibility.
Now, Mohammed Jihad says, same Israelis who kept
shouting for months, quote, Hamas can end the
war if it releases hostages. You remember how
many times we heard that? And I kept
saying how dumb that was because
to what end? Why? Like, I get it.
We want the people home. But just by
you yelling, they could just do that? What
that benefits you? And what do they get?
Really? It's just a deal. Right? And or
they'll just even say they're the worst terrorists
in the world like you say they are.
Why would they give them up for nothing?
That's a really dumb thing to say. Because
you want it to look like you're not
like, what it shows you is the typical
Israeli propaganda. Clumsy.
Because the idea is how do we paint
it to look like we're not the ones
doing it? So, they go, that's and they
just yell. But if you think about it
half a step further, you realize that it
actually makes you look stupid.
That's basically everything you've seen from Israel since
October 7th.
He says the same people saying that are
now having meltdowns and seizures over the news
that Hamas is releasing the hostages and ending
the war. It's hilarious when you think about
it. Because it it it shows you they're
lying
like everything else. They told you 15 months.
It was never about the hostages, only about
genocide. I agree.
Here you go. Here are examples. Avi Mayer,
former editor in chief at Jerusalem Post.
Remember, the had the the one of the
covers where I read one of the articles
is Ben Gavir claiming he is stopping deals.
Right? It says Israel will reportedly release 30
to 50 Palestinians for each Israeli hostage.
I was just talking about this. He goes,
this was one of Hamas' core demands.
When you hear about the devaluation
of Palestinian life,
remember that it is Hamas that insists that
a single Israeli has worked 50 plus no
one anywhere said that. What he's doing is
projecting his supremacy
mindset onto other things to make the argument
for why this didn't work for them. Every
other deal they've been screening about why they
should get 1 you know, 50 for every
one they release.
I've I talked about this twice already since
October 7th. I just think it's so lazy.
Zionist propaganda is so stupid. He knows that
some people buy it because, well, that's what
you can see on the document. Right?
They never acted like it was because we're
valuable more. It simply is because you hold
10 times the hostages.
The reality though is that every time before
it, they have been pushing that because they
state
their people are more important.
It's just so funny to me how it's
like that means he must be somewhat conscious
of his own supremacy, and all he can
do is project it onto you knowing that
he believes it. But it's bad when you
do it.
There's just so many contradictions in everything Zionism.
It makes me laugh. But it's so sad
and terrifying because they're powerful and committing genocide,
obviously.
Now Arsen, again, of Trotsky, says, for the
record,
this is not a prisoner exchange.
The Israelis to be released from Gaza are
hostages, children, women, elderly. No. They're not. The
vast majority
are not. They're IDF members. Even people who
you say are elderly are still people that
were in the IDF. That's not the same
thing as being active members, but it does
change the conversation. The main point though is
that children
we're talking about the Bebas family, guys. That's
where that's at.
And they they make everything.
We've already seen most of these people come
back. Now whether or not they've held back
most of the people who are not,
we'll have to wait and see. But we
know from day 1, the the vast majority
of the people that were taken were IDF
members. That was even admitted by Israeli media.
And even the images they would put out
saying, look at all the people that were
hostages. You can look in the images and
you can see that it says reserve, you
know, major
that makes them PLW's.
Especially all the women they keep trying to
use to say they're being abused and they're
kidnapped.
Those women are literally the active IDF members
that were in those towers. I mean, but
they don't care, guys. They know that and
they don't care. So that means they know
that they're trying to present this as innocent
when they know that they're not.
Why would they do that? Because they're liars.
It says the Palestinians being released are convicted
terror. No. They're not. The vast majority of
those have never been charged with a crime
according to even Israeli media. It's just so
dumb. These people just can't get beyond like,
you know, you could you could make narratives
that aren't necessarily riddled with provable lies that
might convince people. But instead, they just go
full
full Zionist.
It's lame. It really is silly that they
can't see how obvious that becomes when they
just push it to a cartoon level.
But it says there's no equivalence. None.
No equivalence.
2 people being kidnapped or people being taken
POW. Well, that's exactly the equivalent. They're exactly
equivalent.
But what he's just let the same point.
He just let it clear that he is
his premise mindset. We are more important. There
is no equivalence. We are more important.
Oops.
They can't even hide it.
But what I think is important, guys,
when we see this come to pass, we're
gonna find out the truth of it all.
And that is what I think is clear
that these people have been killed, most of
them, by IDF bombs, which any survivors have
already told us they've come back or some
of them have. On top of the fact
that what we're gonna point to in the
Beavis family point is going to be revealed
soon, one way or the other.
They have, ever since the beginning, have used
there's been a major focused political campaign around
just these children. You know why? 1,
because the red hair apparently was unique and
and that was what it it stood out.
And that they said that in Israeli media.
But secondarily,
because they were the basically, the sold example
of a child being taken like this, which
is a crime, unequivocally.
Anybody that takes it this is not an
IDF member, obviously. It's a child. That's a
kid that is a kidnapping. That's why they
keep pointing to that when they make this
argument as if it's everybody. The point on
top of that though,
is that
the father
publicly said they were killed by IDF bombs.
Now, obviously, he could be lying. But apparently,
it was also confirmed by corporate media, and
I'll show you this now. But that could
just be because they were reporting what he
said. But, again, it who it couldn't have
come to pass where that's not the case,
and we're reporting it with them. All we've
been saying the entire time
is that all these Zionists get this is
an old this is an older one. They've
been doing this, like, every day for the
longest time. Here's Habiba Kompas doing the same
thing. The children.
I said all these Zionists continue to use
the Bebas children for their genocidal propaganda,
even though their father publicly admitted they were
killed by idiot bombs months ago, which they
verifiably know. How brave can you be?
That's true. Right? So all they do is
go, hey. I was be forced to do
that. Well, you know why you know why
that's important to consider? Because
they said that about all the other hostages
that came out who have still maintained what
they said while they were forced, in quotes,
to say what they said then. So which
means, by the way, if you're hard of
understanding, they weren't forced because they keep saying
it to today.
Now there's a few variations which are very
interesting to think about, but most of them
have continued to maintain exactly what they said
when they came out.
So it could be that he's lying or
he was forced, but the evidence in front
of us seems to suggest that they're not.
That's like every other part we're making. We
don't know. It hasn't happened yet.
But guess what they've continued to do? Almost
like a targeted campaign
made it only about them because they know
it's emotional. That's gross.
It says Israel will be releasing 100 of
terror terrorists who have blood on their hands.
No. The bunch of children and and people
you kidnapped in hospitals. But it says to
release a baby who was taken hostage at
just 10 months old. Yeah. Which is true.
And whoever did that should be taken held
accountable.
Hamas or Palestinian Ilhamid Jihad or random Palestinian.
Yes. They should be charged for that. But
so too should every single Israeli who's been
committing genocide. So too should every single Israeli
soldier who took part in the Hannibal directive,
who killed your people. But he'll never talk
about that because he's not interested in helping
anybody but himself.
Again, this person is simply saying he got
bombed, but he doesn't care.
Dan Cohen. This is the report from CBS
saying, in the reporting on the deaths of
the Beavis family, CBS is forced to acknowledge
they were killed by Israeli air strikes, not
Hamas.
It's just so lazy, all of this. But
they still use those babies may mimic memory.
It makes me sick. Here's Hen Mazig,
somebody who has me blocked by the way
because I made him look really stupid for
a pretty long continuous period.
He says, reminder,
this is on 13th. Soon, you'll hear from
bad faith actors how the Israeli hostage are
just prisoners of war. See my point? So
when he does, he grabs the one shot
of a child and says, this is all
of them, and we're the dishonest actors.
He goes, show them the video of the
youngest held. As if you're supposed to pretend
that they're all somewhat young. They're not.
He's turning 2 in captivity. Yeah. Maybe maybe,
unless he was bombed by Israel and killed
them a long time ago. Which is horrifying.
But that's what his father said.
Now just in case you missed the point
is they're all using these children to make
you emotionally outraged.
Damn them for making us have to make
that point. Just like with the rape conversation,
they all lied about.
Damn them for making us have to have
to sit through it and make claim and
or and, like, argue why they might have
lied about rape. Damn them for making that
happen.
But guess what? They lied.
In every single case, they lied.
Robert Enlakash says, all eyes on Gaza. It
appears as if we are nearing a ceasefire
which could actually happen this time. Historically, this
is when Israel ramps up its massacres.
Now he says after 15 months,
Israel's 2 stated war goals have failed,
defeating Hamas
and returning the captives by force.
They nev they relentlessly made those points.
So ask yourself why it makes sense right
now to even pretend
to go away from that. Because that makes
them look bad to their own people, to
their own government, everybody. It makes them look
weak.
So why would they do that?
Truly, you could argue they're just so weak
and they are truly being defeated, so they
just gave up, which I just don't makes
doesn't make sense. Based on everything they've done.
And the support they get blindly from the
most powerful military nation in the world. Right?
So the what continues to again, with everything
not happened yet, what I think makes the
most sense is Netanyahu and Trump
have agreed to make it look this way.
Now, obviously, that's what a lot of these
rally media is saying. So it's not hard
to see the connection. It's not like I
just made this up. That that's what makes
sense to me though.
That it clearly lines up who benefits.
They both win from it.
Right? Netanyahu used to keep going and Trump
will let him go.
And he gets to pray. He get to
to tell his own people how he played
the United States, which he does every time.
Trump gets looked like he got a win.
We ended the deal. His own people will
go on for 4 years pretending like it
never happened, it's over, as they keep killing
Palestinians.
Sadly, I think that's what's happening. I hope
I'm wrong. Douglas McGregor, just on the lend
point. He keeps he said this on 11th.
Now I'm not sure why he said this
in this now, but he goes, the idea
of putting US ground troops in Gaza puts
the United States in a place of unwanted
opposition to the entire Islamic world. So it
really worries me. Now he has said things
in the past that don't come to pass.
That doesn't mean he didn't know something that
that maybe just diverted. He is a was
a former general or former yeah. Retired combat
veteran, former colonel. Excuse me.
So he has insight. Right? He knows people.
So my worry is that that's something that's
cr that some Trump and they're already talking
about troops on the ground. But let's be
clear about this. That is also not new.
This is from November 2023
from the Times of Israel. US special forces
said deployed to help Israel track down hostages,
who, by the way, they've been killing.
So ask yourself how much they know of
that, or maybe they're involved. But down here,
of course, you get the, you know, pushback
about how dumb he is because, you know,
it's they'll never do that. They've already done
it. Then it's already been happening. I commented
it somewhere down here.
Okay. To finish in general, guys, let's not
forget that on top of everything else.
Right? Like even if it's exactly what it
looks like, they're still bombing Lebanon.
They are still literally bombing civilians in Lebanon
as we speak. Right? That's happening. Sarah Abdallah
breaking this down. That's not gonna go away.
Well, they're still murdering people in Syria.
Right? That's still happening. Right? Here they are.
Oh, let me do this real quick. I
think there's more. Yeah, here we go.
Oh, a bunch more. Oh, goody.
What? I thought I had I didn't have
that much.
There we go. Okay.
Point again, Lebanon.
So it's interesting that we're talking about ceasefire
when, obviously, the war has expanded well beyond
Gaza.
So that does that seems to be a
huge part problem for this conversation.
How how much you wanna how easy would
be to blame Hezbollah for why Gaza kicked
back up. Right? You see what I'm saying?
Like, that's a big issue for me. Also,
the West Bank.
That's literally a part of Palestinian territory. And
so we're not in Gaza. We're not talking
about Gaza. So as they're literally pretending a
ceasefire just came to pass in Gaza, they're
bombing the West Bank right now. Israeli bombs
Jenin
refugee camp in West Bank for the second
time in 24 hours. This is today.
As we're all screaming about a ceasefire deal
and how it's all over, they're bombing the
West Bank. Like, it makes me sick how
easy it is for them to get away
with this. And don't forget, they've now, in
his secret rag bag that that article argued,
he gave them the right to keep going
after West Bank. Maybe that's why.
Mary Madison sure paid him for it.
Khaleesi says
or first, Haratz writes, 2 young children were
getting ready for school, and IDF drone killed
them.
January 12,
2025.
That's from
her. She says, in the West Bank, where
no Israeli hostages are being held. How do
you make sense of that?
Right? What are we pretending here? There's no
there's no justification. There's no secret tunnel. What
are we talking about?
Oh, that's right. We're not talking about it.
I forgot. We'll ignore it all. Is that
the game? They're straight up killing children as
they get ready for school in the West
Bank, while we're all praising Trump for come
on, guys. It's still a good thing if
it happens, but let's not lose sight of
what's going on.
Low key points out Israeli spies use an
ambulance to kill an 80 year old woman
in the West Bank. No. This is Sky
News. You watch it for yourself. It's right
on CCTV.
They pull up, they execute her, and they
drive on.
You can just see at the very least,
just trying to wrap up.
Right here.
They pull up,
open fire,
killer.
Was that the one?
Right here. Oh, sorry. Not the not the
right one yet.
Yeah. I mean, you can hear it. It's
right the point is right there. That's her
right there on the ground. They rape. They
drive up, and they just open fire on
these people, and they drive away.
That's Israel for you. Spies use an ambulance
to kill an innocent woman in the West
Bank, mind you. You know, sort of like
dressing up like hospital members to invade a
hospital and kill us people in beds, or
we use the a humanitarian aid peer to
invade and kill a lot of civilians.
Sure sounds like the good guys, doesn't it?
Now here, by the way, is the West
Bank from the United Nations. West Bank, monthly
snapshot, casualties, property damage. So we're still remember,
there's no hostages over
there. This is January 20, January 4 14th.
Come on.
There you go.
So this is just December. Okay? 36 Palestinians
have been killed just in December.
218 injured. 185
structures destroyed. That's not just by bombing. That's
by displacement.
Displaced persons, almost 300. All of this is
illegal. Only one is really fatale fatality.
This is by the way, if you're confused,
this has been going on for 76 years.
That's that's why it's not new. It's not
some war. It's just the same thing they've
been doing, that Trump's gonna continue.
Makes me sad.
Assad says, was not expecting it from Politico,
but this is the best headline I've seen
from the New Lancet study. Another Lancet study.
If you're going to report on the massive
death toll in Gaza, you should mention who
is killing Palestinians, which they I think that's
what Politico says. Israel has killed many more
people in Gaza than reported, top health study
says. More than 64,000
people in Gaza died violent deaths between October
23 June 2024, which that's what we could
prove.
Over 200,000, I think that's without question at
this point. As even the 1st lands of
study says the estimate is a 184,000.
Even political calling it out.
Lands of study, God's health ministry under counted
death toll by 41%.
Here
is,
how,
son of a gun.
It's gotta be down here. It starts with
an h. I I can't remember, I'm blanking
on stuff today.
Oh my gosh. That's so frustrating.
Big fan of his work.
I'll find you as I play it. Now
this is an important clip where he's breaking
down, and he's been he's been an act
Scott Scott Horton. That's right. He's breaking down
this conversation for quite a while.
And what's hilarious to me is he talks
about this, and he gets completely, like, Zionists
lose their minds. Because it is it's absolutely
provable. It has been from the very first
moment this started. But now we've gotten so
far away from it, and so many things
have been broken down that it's important to
rehear this, that this is who we're dealing
with.
Huge part of the story of October 7th
was based on explaining away the results of
the implementation
of the Hannibal directive.
Hamas surely murdered people mostly with gunshots, rifle
shots, and grenades, handheld grenades, things like this.
Well, who blew up this whole house full
of people? Yeah. An Israeli tank did. Right.
Who blew up all these cars?
Israeli helicopters.
But they had to put all that on
Hamas.
So they showed all this destruction. They said,
oh, he blew they tied up this family
and then set them all on fire, and
they cut off the heads of all these
babies, and they elaborated all of this stuff.
There was 1 baby that was killed by
a gunshot through a door. Which is horrible.
Which is horrible. Absolutely horrible. And it was
a Hamas, apparently, a Hamas member who fired
the shot and killed that baby. But what
did they say? They claimed that there were
20 babies had their heads cut off, and
then they were hung from a clothesline.
They said that a woman, and this actually
happened in the Dar Yassin massacre in 1948.
The Israelis did this to Palestinians.
Cut the woman's stomach open and killed her
baby.
That is a real story from what the
Israelis did to the Palestinians. They lied and
said that the Palestinians did that to them.
Another story true from the Nakba.
They took a man's baby and threw him
in an oven.
And they used that story
that the Israelis had done to the poor
Palestinians
and pretended that the Palestinians had done that
to them. So in other words, instead of
just saying, oh my god, Candace. It was
horrible. All these people were killed. Civilians were
shot in their own homes, in their cars,
on the road. Oh, no. No. Instead, it
was, oh, they tied children up and set
them on fire. They cut their heads off
of babies. They blew up these houses. They
blew up all these people in their cars
and all this stuff. And you're correct. My
ex is filled with all of these videos
of what they are now doing to Palestinian
children, babies that are actually beheaded, babies that
are actually burned, and America just turns the
cheek. Yeah. They call it fake. Yeah. In
my mentions, every day, they go, oh, that's
fake. They're a bunch of actors. Oh, yeah.
The Palestine the the Gazan people right now
are acting like they just stopped They can't
eat.
Yeah. You know, they're starving, but everyone's just
conspiring to pretend that this is happening. Like,
everyone from the ICC to the UN to
Yeah.
Everybody who is saying that this is actually
happening, the journalists that have risked their lives
get these stories out and our Western media
won't cover it. And, Candace, it is like
the Waco massacre It's disgusting. Every day. Imagine
Bill Clinton burning Waco and then doing it
again and again and again and again
for a year. And they're losing moving settlers
in instantly. Yeah. They're either this was totally
unplanned, guys, but we do have a group
of settlers who are gonna move in and
take this land immediately,
gratefully, and that's what they like, a serious
like, with Syria, just now what's happening.
Gosh. It's just so frustrating how obvious it
is.
It's just so simple. Every single thing they
said is not just true. It's easily verifiable
by by statements and documents and government's
own public statements.
Kills me. Now I would add though, I
don't agree with that statement about the, you
know first of all, interesting the Waco point
is really important to to for some, like,
some context. Like, think about that. Think about
that every single day. Multiple Waco's every day
for years, year and a half at this
point. But the idea that
I don't I first of all, it's very
obvious that they're the the whole game where
they're, oh, it's Hollywood. They're it's it's just
the genocide proving that there is a genocide
is the easiest part of this conversation. They
are murdering people without question. But the point
is
to argue that they, you know, they're all
faking it. Yeah. Certainly possible. Like, because realize
that is what happens in some other cases,
where journalists are faking in government and the
UN. Yeah. Yeah. It's not that outside their
own possibility. So don't just immediately go yeah.
I that's the kind of argument I don't
like. When you when people go, no. Well,
you know, no one's actually listening to you.
Well, yeah. You know, I don't think that's
the case. I think they are. So, I
just think that's important to consider. But overall,
I think the evidence backs up exactly what
they were saying to a tee. And that
those people are being bombed. And you can
prove it because of a 1,000 different ways
other than that they wouldn't just fake it.
You see what I'm saying? But, you know,
it's still an important point to make. Because
the what I get what they're what they're
trying to say really is that, you know,
you see these people that are suffering, you
know, and what they're dealing with. And the
idea that this massive effort we're going just
to pretend all of that as as, of
course, anything is possible is wildly unlikely with
how much we can see. Now here is
a post from Salrad saying ethnic cleansing of
Palestinians is happening out of the open for
everyone to see. It has been for a
very long time. Another article from January 10,
125 from Haaretz. My Bedouin village was destroyed
so that Israel can build a Jewish village
in its place. You don't invite a bunch
of New York Jews in there. Does that
make sense?
Now, again, understand that this is how Zionism
works. That they are using those people in
order to present a very clear pic picture
to the world. That is my belief. You
can come to your own conclusions about it.
Now, Vivid, of course, makes the case for
me. Very, very clear pro Zionist mindset says,
this is Jubileeah,
the Gaza completely destroyed. This is a reminder
of what the consequences of starting a war
with Israel look like. Great. So thank you
for admitting that you're a genocidal maniac, that
your idea is this is what it looks
like when you start a war with Israel.
We destroy everything that you are. Yeah. Thank
you. You're a criminal. We already know that,
guys. Thank you for admitting that you guys
are
openly showing war crimes. I don't care if
you agree with this sentiment or not.
This is an objective war crime.
This is not, look, we killed every Hamas
location, and we killed every Hamas human shield,
or we bombed every tunnel. This is this
is how we repay you for doing what
you did, which they're talking about Palestinians. Look
at their account.
So just be clear about that, guys. This
is this is just a Zionist, by the
way. Not necessarily the government, but they've also
made these statements too. All of them.
The govern our governments and media just ignore
it.
Now here's APAC, by the way, as we're
watching the destruction of Jabaliya and everything Gaza
completely destroyed.
APAC's going, hey. A chunk of a Houthi
missile, which of course, that we can't verify,
crashed into a family's home in Jerusalem.
Multiple homes were damaged by a missile fragment
after the Iran backed terror group, not what
they are, sent millions of Israelis into bomb
shelters. Oh, I feel so bad for them.
Iran's terror proxies are hell bent on killing
Israelis.
Yeah. This is what we care about. Right?
Not the genocide. Not the starvation of children.
Not the death ethnic cleansing of all the
people in these areas. And by the way,
in Yemen too. In Syria too.
All over the world, you guys. In Lebanon.
Southern Lebanon. Like, right now, realize they're murdering
and ethically cleansing in Syria. In Yemen, they've
been starving people for generations.
But let's complain about a missile.
Man, I'm gonna have them redo my roof
tomorrow. Damn it. You guys are genociding us
over here. Like, I'm really not trying to
do down diminish
even the average people in Israel. It's not
it's not their fault this habit. It's Israel's
fault that's happening. So they're they're victims of
Israel too.
I just think it's sick that they have
the nerve, while they're bragging about funding every
politician in the US, for them to come
out and get and scream about how we
had to go into shelters. Oh, you mean
your air conditioned lovely shelters and or the
hotel built in fancy hotels you're staying in
while you don't have your legal settlements? All
of that's true.
It's sickening to me that this is what
people pretend makes sense.
At the same time, here's Associated Press. A
growing number of Israeli soldiers
are speaking out against the Israeli war. They
say they did not they write Israeli Hamas
war. They say they did or saw things
that crossed ethical lines. Haaretz has written about
this, like, 17 times since the beginning of
October 7th. And one that and one that
went before
about how they talked to Israeli soldiers. And
they and remember, we we made a really
horrifying coverage on this one. I think it
was about a couple weeks ago.
Major article, hopefully, you saw it from Heretz,
where they were talking to these people from
the IDF, went back a decade, I think.
And they ultimately were talking about leaders that
went out there and they saw, like, everything,
like a 7 year old child.
Just walked over there and just broke his
arm and kicked him on the ground and
said, that's what like, because he's Palestinian.
That's it. And it happens every day. Rape
and torture and, I mean, it's disgusting.
And they're covering it in their own media.
I mean, here's actually a quick side note
that is relevant to just present what for
what I'm just saying right now. And I
was gonna point out later.
But I do this is just interesting to
me how much this is
Where is that?
Hold on one second. Since I brought it
up, I'm gonna show you now.
The point is basically about,
it's a sexual a sexual abuse conversation from
Israel.
Maybe I don't have it over here. Oh,
there it is.
And and you can do this for yourself.
I've done it too. I mean, I've it's
just it's important to give it more context,
which I will, but you can do I'll
just include this since we're talking about it.
Because if you look these things up,
for example, in this press news, it's saying,
search Google,
quotes 65% of Israeli Jews.
So then search 61% of Israeli men. Now,
what it says here is 61% of men
don't see forced sex as act as a
as,
forced sex with acquaintance as rape.
That's Israeli harrats writing about 61% of men
in Israel. Or the conversation about most men,
or most women in her in the IDF
have been sexually abused.
These are not hard things to put your
mind to, guys. This is the reality. Now
that doesn't mean every Jewish person, not even
remotely. It doesn't mean every Israeli person, not
even remotely. There's a lot of people that
are against what's going on. I don't think
it's the majority though, based on their own
coverage. But it's just important to see. Because
what we're talking about here is that this
is the mindset.
Right? They're in this case, they're oh, I
haven't even played the video yet. They're they're
crossing all sorts of lines. And the idea
was that that's what brought me to it
is that in that old article,
they're openly talking about what they do to
these people. And now we have real time
video discussion on news about why they should
be able to rape Palestinian prisoners.
Again, the main point, if you don't think
by now with even just what we saw
today that the world can't see this, then
you're lying to yourself. Here's what she had
to say.
An event in Tel Aviv that has been
put on by soldiers who say that they
are refusing to continue to fight in Gaza.
The soldiers said that they do not agree
with the way that this war is being
fought. Some of them have been inside of
Gaza saying that they don't agree with what
they had to do or what they saw.
Soldiers in the field have a lot of
freedom,
a lot
of freedom of act. They could do pretty
much whatever they want, and they won't be
accountable. As
a therapist, I see the suffering of both
sides and especially the suffering
of Israelis, soldiers, and civilians that experiencing
trauma after trauma after trauma with no end
near.
Some people say there were too many strikes
on too many innocent civilians. And some people
say that this is just a drop in
the bucket and that this movement is fairly
insignificant.
The soldiers say that they're hoping this movement
is going to put pressure on the government
to have a ceasefire.
Right. It's in who cares about the few
people with morals?
It's insignificant. We don't care that they care
about Palestinian life. That's disgusting. Even that that
it's just crazy to me. Now, don't forget,
that we there's more than 1. I think
it's at least 4 or 5 now of
whistleblowers from the IDF just since October 7th
who are stepping up and telling you what's
going on. Here's just the one that I
clipped out.
Do you think that you witnessed
war crimes taking place?
Probably.
The ground assumption is that they are Hamas.
And then if you go this way, you're
bound to kill people that are not.
Now in a rare interview, one soldier tells
us about the reality he says he witnessed.
What kind of stuff would they say? There
are no uninvolved,
only unarmed. This is something that I'm going
to carry for the rest of my life.
I mean, guys,
it's just it's just so silly
how many things we have to demonstrate that
this is and and I hope it's important.
I hope you see that this is about
the Israeli government.
Right? This is them influencing and Zionism
driving this, influencing, brainwashing their people just like
we see in this country. It's very important
to see that. And here's the actual article,
by the way. IDF whistleblower admits institutional war
crimes are openly being committed in Gaza. That
sentiment is backed up by different Harrettes articles,
other IDF whistleblowers,
many, many, many, many different examples of people
saying the exact same thing. Of which are
them just praising the stuff, laughing about
it. Now, to end on this point and
by the way, here's per Patricia Heaton with
the Bebas family baby in her picture.
Says never thought I'd see the day where
60 minutes came out in support of Hamas.
First of all, anybody that's still blindly following
60 minutes should probably not be listened to.
But either way, the point is that because
60 minutes finally finally comes out and says,
maybe not good thing. Not even like full
genocide, but just like, I don't know. People
in the state department aren't agreeing with this.
She freaks, homage and pro homage. Like, it
just shows you how weird these people are.
Like, that is pro homage. Even highlighting for
a fraction of a second that maybe they're
not doing the right thing is like, you
boss, good guy. That's not even remotely what
they're saying. But it just shows you how
fragile this all is. These people are are
either desperate to not see the truth or
actively fighting to keep you in the dark.
Here's what 60 minutes had to say, and
this is specifically
about simp just state the state department, I'll
play that clip of the guy telling you
about children being raped and Israel covering it
up. And now he's resigned today because of
the ongoing genocide.
She does she wants you to think these
people don't matter. They just all love Hamas.
And, oh, by the way, the way the
video starts, which is kinda funny to me.
I can just show you right here.
Look at where it starts.
I said and even that's my point about
even corporate media.
These are opportunists, guys. They recognize they can't
keep lying to you. So they're trying to
give you some. That's so dumb to me
that they're still trying to pretend like there
is any even remote connection between Hamas and
ISIS.
But despite the fact or I guess other
than the fact that they're both funded by
Israel, but interestingly, that they keep shoving this
in your face. Right now, you know who's
carrying those flags? The people in Syria that
they're funding and openly supporting.
But they want you to pretend like these
are the Hamas characters because they show you
an image on 60 minutes. You show me
an actual provable evidence point of them being
in any way supportive of that flag or
ISIS, and I will give you a $100.
I know and right now, what we can
see is a bunch of propaganda videos that
Israel and the rest have cobbled together. They're
ideologically
not consistent, guys. Now you could argue that
Israel has made this the reality in some
of the controlled elements. But again, today, I
don't even know if that's the reality anymore.
Robert's written about it more than once. It's
it's it's the same as pretending like Iran
is ISIS. These things don't make sense,
especially since ISIS keeps attacking Iran when Israel
wants it to, but let's pretend like they're
the ones working with ISIS though. But
here it is. The level of anger throughout
the Arab world, and I'll say beyond the
Arab world,
is palpable.
Protests began erupting in the Arab world, which
I was also documenting,
with people burning American flags.
This is fake. Oh, and by the way,
sorry to stop. I know people always get
mad at me about it. The the point
is that they're trying to set the table
for the fact that this is gonna bite
back in the United States. So that's really
the major point. The whole Al Qaeda secretly
embedded coming to this country and Trump's gonna
fight them out. That's why I see this
being, quite frankly. Yet again, using a little
bit of truth to get you on board
for the next lie. That's what I think
this is. But that's the idea that this
is gonna come back to bite America.
Even though, what, they've been supporting the genocide?
That's not what she's saying though.
Throughout the Arab world, and I'll say beyond
the Arab world,
is palpable.
Protests began erupting in the Arab world, which
I was also documenting,
with people burning American flags.
This is very significant because we worked so
hard
after the war on terror to strengthen ties
with the Arab world. You believe that this
has put a target on America's back, like
you've said. A 100%. Those are strong words.
Yes. The government. Yeah. I don't say them
lightly.
And I say it as someone that myself
has survived 2 terrorist attacks.
My first assignment was in the US embassy
in Yemen.
Not terrorists. I survived
a mortar attack. An illegal attack. Say it
as someone who has worked intensely on these
issues
and has intensely monitored the region for 2
decades.
Multiple diplomats we spoke with say the US
policy on Gaza has led to widespread dissent
at the state department Mhmm. A rarely used
method of sending cables to the secretary of
state
created during the Vietnam War so employees could
voice objection,
has received a record number of submissions over
Gaza.
Thirteen officials, including from the state department, White
House, and army have publicly resigned in protest.
A lot.
Shouldn't that matter?
Now it's just it what's what's crazy to
me what's interesting actually are you gonna say
what she's talking about?
First, you know, Yemen and so it's it's
like pretending being in an illegal occupied base
in Iraq and being bombed as a terrorist
attack.
It's just stupid. That's not the case. Based
on any law, anywhere, other than US narrative.
Cause you're illegally occupying a territory that's Yemen
included, and you're being bombed because you're the
illegal occupier. There literally doesn't have to be
any justification. That is the same point from
laws. That is the armed resistance of an
illegal occupier.
That's for Geneva Convention, guys. That's international law.
So it doesn't really matter. Even if crimes
are later committed, the original act is still
protected international law, as we saw with Hamas,
as crimes were obviously committed. It's interesting because
she frames it as a terrorist attack. What
she ultimately saying is, you know, that this
is going to come back to bite America,
which is an is an objective reality. What
they're doing is bad. They're hurting people. So
someone's gonna all they do is use the
resistance back or fight back as the framing
of more terrorism, which they have to keep
fighting. It's a self fulfilling prophecy. It's what
Israel has taught them, it seems.
But here is also what Israel is doing
as they completely infiltrate our government.
This is actually wild to me that she
thinks this is even acceptable. So here's Stefanik.
Right? The one who was, like, with her
hands shaking, driving forward the antisemitism
narrative that they all made up.
She has been posting this every single day,
and only this for 465
days.
Watch this.
For the podcast, it says, day 465.
It has been 465
days since Hamas terrorists abducted innocent civilians.
Mostly not. Right? Mostly POWs.
And b and barbaric 7th October 7th attack,
which included mostly killed by Israel from their
Hannibal directive, but she she probably knows all
this. Doesn't care. There are a 100 still
being held hostage in Gaza, including 7 Americans,
and she's only talking about Israeli Americans, has
no concern for the other hundreds of of
Americans that are in Palestine. We must bring
them home now, she says.
Right. So the point is
every single time we've proven, and now they're
openly admitting, and she still doesn't care because
she's ridiculous, that they've been blocking the deals.
Netanyahu and Ben Kavir have been blocking the
deals. So she's sitting here screaming this when
they're the ones blocking it. See how stupid
this person is or how they are all
absolutely
compromised.
But check oops, wrong way. Check this out.
Day 4 66.
Day 4 65.
Day 4 64. 43. Look, look, that's the
only thing, guys. Well, she retweeted something right
there in support of of speaker Johnson because,
you know, they're on the good side, right?
Look at this.
This is an American politician,
allegedly, ostensibly working for American interests. And the
only thing that she's using to say on
her Twitter account, which is where most of
her following is, pretty much all of her
following, almost over 600,000,
is every single day redirecting
your attention over to what's going on
only the Israelis in Gaza.
Not the Americans,
other than the Israeli Americans, not the at
just simple Americans or the Palestinian Americans. Right?
Not that. Because they were in Palestine, as
NPR showed you, on day 1. They've been
killed and bombed like everybody else. An American
politician doesn't even care about them. Or the
American Palestinian that was bombed and almost killed,
he showed his passports. You didn't care about
him. The American family that was in there
going, our government's abandoned us. There's nobody coming
to get us. She didn't even make a
peep.
But every single day, she's pointing at what
they're what and we're talking about
the genocide they're committing. And the only thing
she's pointing to is the fact that their
people are being held.
That is not America first, guys. That is
somebody who is screaming the only thing I
care about is Israel. Because that's what they
do. Because that's what gets them in power
today. What does that show you?
And again, I showed you this before, but
I said, while the vast majority of the
world sees and acknowledges the ongoing genocide,
that he no doubt sees, Elon Musk, he
doubles down every day. There are only a
few logical explanations to this. Here he is,
responding to autism capital that's simply saying, do
you wanna equip and support the existence of
Israel? And that's Elon asking that. And she
goes, yes, of course. We need to protect
them. And he says, clear.
What? January 9th.
Just that's there's only a few reasons why
somebody would do that knowing we all see
what he's the time what he's lying about.
Think about
it.
I believe it's Klompas.
You know, guys, the Fetterman thing is so
crazy to me. Like, it's, like, here's a
good point to make. This is what an
opportunist looks like. The only problem is we're
not giving him enough reason to lean in
the other direction. This guy will follow whatever
you, whatever you say, whatever you demonstrate will
benefit him. I mean, that's what I I
think that's very obvious. Like, this guy is
just following whatever is getting him more clout
and more interest and more and the guy
can barely string the 3 words together. So
I honestly think he's just being manipulated. They're
using this guy, and they're making him say
things that make him look even stupider.
As a supposed person working for America, right,
he says, my voice and my vote will
always follow Israel.
Can you think of 1? Think about saying
that while we all see the genocide. 2,
as an American politician, my vote will always,
always my voice and my vote will always
follow Israel.
Okay. Hypothetically speaking, Fetterman, what if they committed
a genocide? What would you do then? Well,
clearly, you would keep supporting them. What if
they, tomorrow, bomb Florida? Well, according to him,
always
follow Israel.
See? That's my point is to demonstrate what
that actually means in the context of something
extreme. This guy is not pro America. Okay?
He says, and whatever
needs real needs, economic, military, intelligence,
whatever it is, I'm always going to vote
for them. That's what he just said.
Think about how dumb that is that even
outside of a genocide context to say that
you will always do what the other country
wants,
and yet he only grows in power influence.
What do you think that shows you in
this compromised country?
I simply said, only Zionists and those they
pay or manipulate support the ongoing multi nation
genocide being committed by Israel. As I usually
tend to post because I think it's impactful
for people that haven't seen it, this Jewish
doctor went to Gaza and told the world
that Israel's killing almost exclusively children.
Fetterman is a mindless clout chasing coward.
That's what I believe. Here's what he said.
Ever gonna apologize for being unapologetically
supportive
of of Israel.
I just have to say this. I will
never apologize for being unapologetically
pro Israel.
God, he's such an idiot.
Unapologetically
support I'm never gonna apologize for being unapologetically
supportive
of of Israel.
Woo hoo. They don't care. Whatever and I'm
always gonna vote. My voice and my vote
is gonna follow Israel. And whatever Israel needs,
economic,
military, intelligence, whatever it is, I'm always gonna
vote for them. I'm gonna lean in. I'm
gonna stand. Whoo. Great. Great. Now tell me
again about America First. Now give given he's
not somebody that's seen in that circle, but
he's already openly being supported by that circle
because he's supportive of Israel, and he's saying
Trump's the future. Why? Because they're all on
the same team going in the same direction,
guys, despite d and r. Okay? It's transparent.
Yes. That's my opinion. But I'm just telling
it just seems like the most obvious thing
in the world. Now here, as Federman says
he will always side with Israel, is an
Israeli representative for the government, Hanani Hanani Naftali.
He says, just putting it out there. Here's
what it says.
Exchange each hostage
for 100 pro Hamas US
students. Good for Israel. Good for the USA.
Good for Hamas. Educational for students.
Now, yes. Obviously, oh, I'm just making a
joke. Oh, but your joke includes giving Americans
over to what you call a terrorist organization.
Clearly, they support you guys. Don't you? The
point is, in this country, we love to
pretend that we have the unique value or
value of opinion, that we can think we
want, we can say what we want, except
when you side with something that the supporters
don't actually like. Then we'll we'll kind of
feign but really actively drive toward trying to
deport you, which Trump is actually talking about.
This is not be taken as something that's
a joke. Okay? They are literally actually saying
this in some context. I just wanna highlight
that the Fettermans of the world, the pro
America America First team are all the ones
siding with this exact sentiment.
Clearly, they're not America First if Americans are
the ones that aren't being supported in the
in in
in lieu of a foreign government.
Now here is just something you should remember.
Here is this very terrifying looking guy. This
is just the way he is. Like, this
is he looks like he looks like a
he looks like a psychopath.
His dead stare. He's the one that's supposed
to be a Palestinian adjacent thing that's pro
Israel. He is just a masade agent. I
think it's been shown more than once. Now
this guy is speaking with, Cenk Yaeger, who
Yaeger, whatever his last name is. I'm who
I that's like 0 respect for. But he's
in a he's in a in a
conversation with Piers Morgan.
Now what he says here is important.
He basically slips up and makes it clear
because they think they're just thinking they feel
they get away. They they think they have
impunity.
In many cases, the world has shown them
they do, but it seems to be changing.
At least in the context of average people.
But this is Oh, sorry. Thank you. Orwell's
telling me. Still have the Federman video on.
Sorry to make you stare at that weirdo.
But Khaleesi says, an Israeli agent threatening to
murder any politician in the west who doesn't
back Israel.
He says she says people but people still
think we are completely we are not completely
taken over by Zionism.
This is really important because this was said
in you I mean, I won't even add
as much context as I did last time.
Like, because you really have to think about
the way he watch his eyes, watch the
way he responds when he gets caught for
saying the thing that we all know he's
about to say. It's just very telling the
way he goes forward. And I'll I'll leave
it at that, and we'll go on to
the next point.
Nuclear
program
is going to be destroyed,
and anyone who gets in the way, it
doesn't matter where they are. Even if they
are politicians in the west, they are going
to fall
because
we cannot afford.
Hold on. Did you hear what he just
said? He threatened
politicians in the west that if they don't
agree with Israel's war against Iran, that they're
going to fall.
And remember, he's an Israeli agent. Are you
saying Israel will murder politicians in the west
or get rid of them politically
through bribery or whatever else? What what do
you mean the politicians in the west will
fall if they don't agree that to back
Israel's war against Iran?
Yeah. We will not vote for them anymore.
Yeah. Not buying it. Oh, no. Well, you
don't vote for them now. You're not in
our country. Exactly.
Look at your smile. What do you mean
the politicians will fall?
Oops.
We live in democracy.
Yeah. And we have the right to bring
them up and to bring them down.
Those who agree with Ayahu Alaihi, we bring
one of them in office.
And all the sympathizers
with terrorist
like yourself. We don't want them in the
west.
Who is
we and how are you bringing down politicians
in the west if they dare to defy
Israel?
Tell me how you're bringing them down. I
already answered you then. Are you gonna murder
them, or are you gonna bribe them? Are
you gonna bribe someone else? Who are you
gonna do? Now I quite frankly think that
Cenk Uygur is being a Uygur. Right? I
think that's what it was. He is being
I I I frankly don't see how anyway,
it doesn't even matter. I just think he's
kinda being used here to make him look
like like the you know, give him some
clout that he's aggressively lost over the years.
But that I I see a lot of
these players that kinda get used like that
and you take certain situations. But, anyway, the
point is regardless, what he said was correct.
And I think it's very fascinating to me
how the guy literally got this huge smile
on his face. I think he expected it
to move on. Like, peers would jump in
because historically, that's what happens.
Like, he wants like, this is what the
Israeli entities do. And I'm talking about the
spy government overlap is they sit there and
they love to taunt and flaunt the idea
that we're in power. We can control what
you say. Netanyahu says it all the time
in front of people in Israel.
Many videos have come out about it. But
I think the point is he's sitting there
saying it because he wants that to be
said. We can do what we want and
smiles and sits back. And it just sits
there. And he I think he really comes
to the realization, like, woah. Okay. Democracy.
Like, uh-oh. I think things have shifted a
little bit.
Very telling. So coming back to the overarching
point, think about what they might be willing
to do to you and why Fetterman and
anybody else is saying we'll side with them
no matter what.
I just don't know how we can't start
people can ignore this at this point.
Now this is an important conversation we had
on August 13th. The Israeli election interference and
psychological operation industrial complex.
This guy was caught in an investigation by,
like, I think it was Elmande and Guardian
openly admitting on a secret camera, kind of
like a,
Project Veritas dynamic where they had a secret
camera, and they went in acting like they
were from, like, Chad or Nigeria or something
like that, and they wanted to manipulate an
election. And they walked him through it. They
sat him down, and this guy's an Israeli
agent. He literally sat him down and talked
about how we can undo elections, how we
can overthrow governments, how we can use tens
of thousands of bots to influence conversations. This
is what they do.
It was all publicly discussed on The Guardian.
The link is right in this conversation. Of
course, that's deleted from YouTube. Oh, that's weird.
Even the odyssey one's not there.
Who know? Oh, no. That's not odyssey. That's
the bit shoot. Oh, yeah. Guys, I've heard
to say that. There's something off with the
embeds and bit shoot today. There I think
they're working on something. I've reached out to
them, but the bit the embed wasn't working.
That's why it's not in the main article.
But
he is on the record saying, we have
overthrown I think he said, like, 92 governments.
Now he says many of which are he
talked the United States has not left out
of this conversation.
Think about that. He's talking about I think
he said 92 presidential elections. I think that's
what he said. Now, I I could be
having the numbers wrong. It's been a while
since I talked about this. But the idea
that they're flaunting the overthrow of governments prior
to presidential level all around the world needs
to start to develop a bigger picture for
what is actually happening and how long it's
been happening.
Now on the note of the Iran nuclear
program, which is what that Israeli spy was
pushing to justify his actions, I just talked
about this again, but it's been so many
times. Going back as far as I've the
I the International Atomic Energy Agency, including the
former lead of it that got killed by
Israel that I'm I think is quite obvious,
openly saying that he was gonna be killed
by Israel, ultimately telling you that Iran was
not doing this. Here's the outgoing CIA director,
which, of course, the Republicans will say he's
lying for the Democrats or whatever despite them
being wildly pro Israel,
saying no sign Iran developing nuclear weapons. This
is the cradle, but it's been reported by
a lot of corporate media. It's an interview,
which my office I take the cradle I
hold them at a higher standard than corporate
media, but for those that think that matters
more.
So he's lying. They're all lying. I mean,
this is how it works. But don't worry,
guys. Don't worry.
Matthew Miller is gonna make sure he sanctions
a couple of people in Russia. So we're
good. Everything's fine.
This is where our government's at. The US
is imposing sanctions on more than 250 people
involved in Russia's defense industry.
Oh, you mean so selling weapons are now
a crime despite that's, like, you're the leading
group in the world? Are we I mean,
I I can't even understand how they think
this would make any sense.
Because when they do it, it's a crime.
Right? When they do exactly what we do
every single day, that's a bad guy thing
because they're the bad guy. Pretty simple. Right?
I'm not even trying to say they're not.
I'm just simply saying it's really stupid for
us to pretend like these people care about
any of this. They are simply politically abusing
their power to go against an adversary.
Now let's just even say that was the
case, and then they also did altruistic things
for people. Then maybe you could go, well,
maybe there's a bigger picture. We're not seeing
that. They are you I want you to
point out for me if you can an
objectively positive thing that this government has done
in the last 20 years.
I mean, really think about it. Not some
narrative about what they did or how they
saved the Sudan. No. They did not. They
have actively destroyed everything they've touched for as
far as you wanna look back. But let's
just say 20 years.
I really would love to hear what you
have to say about that.
Ryan Grim, a Microsoft employee in Israel, sent
a direct message that was posted publicly in
which he said 45,000
Palestinians died yet. More to come. Men, women,
elders, children, we will kill you all.
According to an initial inner internal posting documented
by Dropsite News, Microsoft says it's looking into
the situation. I want to assure you, it
says, that we are aware of the post
and that it is inconsistent with what we
stand for. So it is real according to
Microsoft. And as a company, does not align
with our values and expectations hardly.
I have been personally walking working in the
situation and this management team, you know, they're
pretending like they care. That's my opinion. The
post also says, as a reminder, please utilize
MSC Cares for global resources for supporting your
mental and emotional well-being well-being. Excuse me.
Here's what
Zachary Foster, I forgot his name of the
day. Here's what he added that he's been
calling this out for a while. He says,
hey, Microsoft. How does genocide fit into your
company values?
Israeli Microsoft sent soft software engineer
served as a sniper
in the special unit Lotar during the genocide
in Gaza.
They're killing innocent people all over the place.
Pretty wild. Now one thing I wanna say
actually going back to this,
or was it the, oh, you know, the
point being ultimately to be clear for those
who may be new to the show, we're
not I I am not in any way
referring to the people of this country. Now
there's obvious overlaps, but the government of the
United States is what I'm talking about. Sort
of like the other countries that we wanna
pretend wanna, you know, kill America. No. They're
talking about the government because the US government
is objectively one of the largest problems in
the world for most people.
If you haven't come to terms with that,
then I don't think you really wanna see
it. But on top of that, recognize
that the point is not that we just
move on. We need to change that. As
Americans, it behooves us. It is in our
interest. It is our responsibility
to fight to change that
like we always have. But sadly, right now,
we're being placated and lied to. And people
like this wanna act like they're the good
people in the world while they are actively
genociding innocent people.
And Microsoft playing its role. Now Bill Ackman,
of course, who's, you know, in the same
circle. We've already talked about him earlier. He
says, here's Erin Moreland. They how she is
not pro Israel, which is such a manipulation,
and why I believe she has absolute moral
clarity on the situation. So just to get
I'm not gonna play it all, but I'll
play the first part that she just jumps
into all of the atrocity propaganda. That's what
I mean, we're still doing this
with people like this. And all these tricks
are grandmas and people that are only listening
to people on CNN and Fox News, guys.
That's what the that's the only thing that's
happening. People that have this deep seated belief
that Zionism and Israel is just Christian, and
it's once that's it just everything gets circumvented
by that. It's not the truth. They hate
you, actually. But the reality being that we're
still playing this game from people like Bill
Ackman
with a 1,000,006
followers.
This this clip itself has a 3rd 311,000
follow or views.
It's reaching people. Now listen to what she
actually says.
So, normally, I would wait until
I could write something
really articulately. I could
make sure it made sense,
make sure it hopefully resonated. I don't know.
Hope that it would be powerful in some
way. It would make a difference, but I
can't wait now. I'm
I'm
jet lagged. I'm in New York.
I've just been reading the news, and
I'm angry, and I'm confused, and I'm scared,
and I am
mind blown by where we have come to
as a world.
And before
the same old ones jump in and say
you're pro Israel. No, I'm not actually.
I'm actually not pro Israel.
I'm anti terror.
I'm anti murder. I'm Well, then you would
be anti Israel if that's the case. Anti
rape.
I'm anti the burning alive of children. This
See where it goes?
For the for the chat. That was not
a knock against grandma's. Definitely not. My grandma's
one of the smartest people in the room.
My point is simply that the people at
that age is my point. And you and
you guys well know, like, people at that
age are more susceptible to the kind of
Christian Zionism
manipulation. That's what I'm arguing. Not necessarily that
you're more susceptible to just any manipulation.
But thank you for saying that, Kate, because
I do think that's important to clarify. But
since I paused it, like, just the idea
that she's literally talking about atrocity propaganda.
Babies and and it's incredible.
It does it's ridiculous.
And she may maybe she even believes it.
Because her idea is that I'm not pro
Israel. I'm anti terror.
Well, I mean, objectively, the world can clearly
see that what they're doing is terrorism. But
she doesn't see that or doesn't care to
point it out. Or maybe she's just listening
to the narrative somewhere else, and that's why
she's so upset that I just I hate
Israel or I'm not pro Israel, but I
can't stand with all the things I'm being
told are happening.
I mean, look. She says it right here.
Jump in and say you're pro Israel.
No. I'm not, actually.
I'm actually not pro Israel.
I'm anti terror.
I'm anti murder. I'm anti rape.
I'm anti the burning alive of children the
same age as my daughter. Didn't happen. I'm
anti the of babies who have spent 100
of days still in captivity.
There are 2 technically, and the point is
that they were killed by the IDF according
to their fathers we just showed you. That's
what I'm anti.
And I would stand with any other country,
and I do, who are subjected to that
kind of treatment.
The difference is though, I wouldn't be needed
with any other country. My voice wouldn't matter
with any other country because everyone else in
the world would be exactly the same.
Okay. So because Jews. That's it.
Let me just cut to the chase for
you because that's where this goes. The 4
minute rant on the fact that the world
hates Jews. That's why no one cares. And
terrorism and babies being raped. It's just stupid,
guys. And it's objectively
proven to be false. All of them. That's
as Scott Horton just showed us. And it's
I mean, he just talked about it, but
the truth is every single thing he talks
about is has been demonstrated by Israeli media.
You've had IDF members admit they were lies.
You've had l I mean, it's across the
board. Harrettes wrote an entire article breaking down
where these lies even came from.
But that's it. That's the kind of thing
you're getting. And Bill Ackman, of course, reaches
to the stars, like, pushes as high as
he can.
Of course,
Patrick says her acting is horrible. I agree.
This person say oh, here's Patrick again saying,
Aaron, impressive acting. Really loving the fake righteous
indignation for the camera. However, if you are
literate enough to read, then you'll have to
know there was no mass rape or any
actual evidence of of rape on October 7th.
Realize, again, if you haven't seen the follow-up,
they just reported again
from the internal from Israel that there's not
even a single a single reported case of
rape from October 7th. Do you know how
many times we've been told a lie?
It's crazy that they even have the gall
to lie about something like that.
And it says, nor were they any beheaded
babies or babies on ovens. Complete b s.
You are spreading lies in long debunked Israeli
propaganda. Old news.
Even Israeli press admitted it's b s.
Now I find it hard to believe she
doesn't know that, but it's certainly possible depending
on who people listen to. Now I will
add as well, and I I've only one
point to this before, but, guys, it's important
to recognize this. If you see things coming
from memri
tv,
most likely or probably always is gonna be
a misrepresentated
story, misrepresented story. Here's Israel. Once Palestine is
free, it says not a single homosexual will
be allowed to live in our pure land.
Such perverted abominations will not be accepted among
us. You know, where that's far more active
is in Israel, in fact. But they don't
wanna tell you that. In spite all the
narratives about leaning into the result the the
woke mindset, it's not the truth. Just like
the idea they push back on head coverings,
well, Orthodox Jews Jewish women are forced to
wear head coverings. The point here, guys, is
that ultimately,
what you see in this comes from a
DC based manipulation place. K? I'll show you
this right now. But my point is that
right now, as dare as Robert has proven,
in Gaza, that's not the case. Now if
you wanna talk about the radicals that have
been armed by Israel and funded by Israel,
that maybe there's an overlap there. But just
like they claim there's no Christians or that
Israeli Zionist lied and got caught on live
interview that there's no hot churches.
Yes. There are, and yes. There are. Both
of them are provable, and and they were
removed mostly by Israel. And even the fact
that they say there are no Jews there
only happened because Israel forced them to move.
All of this becomes because they're at risk
or eventually because they were forced out by
Israel, though. But that's not how they frame
it today. So my point here is this
is a flagrant misrepresentation
of what Palestinians think at large.
But just like they do with Iran, they
say the same things about Iran. This is
not true. They want you to think these
people are evil Muslim terrorists living in caves
because that's what they think about them. In
fact, the reality is that's the the the
very picture that we have in our mind
of that
is Zionism.
And that's really important to take away with
today.
Have used it and brought it, in fact,
to the area. Terrorism as we know it
today, the planting of bombs in marketplaces and
so on and so forth, was in fact
introduced into the Middle East by the Zionists
in the twenties.
But the net result of of Zionist,
terrorism and and violence in the in the
1st 3rd of 20th century has brought forth,
to my mind, the the anomaly, the
horrific and
unacceptable status in the Middle East today of
the state of Israel, which is in fact
an armed garrison state, which now exports more
arms and distributes violence all around the world,
vastly disproportionate to its size. I mean, in
that respect, I think it's a it's it's
a horrible cycle of of violence. But in
it all, I think the Palestinian is the
victim. That's our question about that.
Now, again, this as I as I wrote
about this, they post this on January 12th
because, again, they're just trying to cause chaos.
You know, trying to make it out to
be we can't like, right now, as they're
even flirting with the idea of pretending to
give them something back, they want you to
go, we can't get back to them. They're
terrible. Like, that's what they're trying to do
right there. And I simply said, funny how
every time you see these ridiculously false and
bombastic claims meant to garner outrage and dehumanize
an entire population, it always seems to come
from the so called
DC based Middle East Media Research Institute. What
Zionists have done to the world is horrifying.
And we will end with this point that
I'm telling you is where this is going.
Now this account is a very q account.
Right? This guy, d o q or whatever
it's called. Very much
qanon follower. You were going to read his
account for yourself. He says, and the whole
point is they really have been trying to
sell the idea that save Israel for last,
which is even if you think it's true,
the argument is we're gonna allow all these
people to suffer and die and starve to
death because that's the plan? Well, yeah. That's
pretty effed up if you really understand what
they're trying to tell you. All in the
interest of, you know, the game is because
that's what we have to do to save
the world.
Maybe.
How many times though have they said this
is what's gonna happen? That, like, doesn't just
not happen? Like, the exact opposite happens. And
they just shift narrative. More times than not,
mind you. Because we have been covering this
whole queue dynamic since long before it was
even called queue. Despite to the to the
chagrin actually of all the people pretending like
we don't know what we're talking about. But
he says, hope you've all been paying attention
to Donald j Trump's stance on Netanyahu. Yeah.
We have. Clearly, you have not. Because if
you look at what his conversation is, it's
because Trump hates Netanyahu and secretly is trying
to that's what he's pretending. He goes, it's
everything and it will change the course of
history forever, in my opinion.
If you go I tell you, look who's
counting if you want. His point is that
Donald Trump secretly hates Netanyahu and it's always
been the plan and he's worth and it's
all some seventy chess move. But Scott says,
don't you think that if Donald j Trump
bites the hand that feeds him that he'll
be Kennedied?
Sheldon Allison gave Trump and Republicans over $424,000,000
since 2016. Now I think it's right now
100 of 1,000,000 just for Adelson,
Miriam Adelson since
the the, you know, Trump's power taking power.
And on top of that,
I think I can get this to come
up. Let's see.
Yep. There it is.
Mayor Trump is desperate for Miriam Adelson cash.
Her condition, West Bank annexation.
It's where we are, guys.
That's the point. If you think for one
second that that makes any sense. Now I
hope he's right, because that will be great
if he suddenly made this all end. I'll
cheer him on forever if he does that.
It simply does not seem to line up
with what I expect and what the evidence
shows.
I hope that if you're listening, that that's
what you care about. Right? That we prove
things. Doesn't mean we always have to to
be able to discuss these things. Right? But
we have to demand proof for things that
actually
for anything that's any any importance at all.
And especially when it comes to the ongoing
direction of your government that is acting like
something doing good in the world that's actively
rolling out the very agenda we always thought
we were fighting.
I've just hope we have discernment enough to
at least talk about this. And I really
do believe that most conservatives right now are
beginning to ask these questions.
So thank you for tuning in. As always,
guys, I hope you give some thought to
this. Really stand back and try to look
at it from a nonpartisan view and consider
whether any of this makes sense to you.
I think the evidence is quite obvious, and
I think what we're seeing is pretty alarming.
But as always,
I love you all.
Question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.