This starts, and it's it's really fascinating to
go back. It starts, in
1996
with Netanyahu,
who wrote a book called Fighting,
Terrorism.
And the thesis of the book is, quite,
straightforward and
and very dangerous.
He says, you know, there are there's Hamas,
there's Hezbollah. They oppose Israel. It's not good
for us to fight them directly.
That that won't work.
What we need to do is topple the
governments
that's that back them. So what we need
is regime change throughout the Middle East. And
he actually gave a long list of 7
countries,
that included,
Syria,
Libya,
Iraq,
Iran,
Somalia,
Sudan,
and Lebanon.
And systematically,
the United States has done Netanyahu's bidding for
almost 30 years now, going to war with
every one of them except for the big
one,
that Netanyahu
so much longs for, which is the war
directly
between the United States and Iran.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Monday, January 13, 2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
Not a lot a a lot that I'm
gonna try to get to today, so I'm
gonna keep this very brief to start. I
just wanna oh, as I try to do
in general, just give you kind of an
outline overview of what we're gonna talk about,
keep this as brief as possible, quick points
about censorship that I think you guys are
gonna find interesting. I wanna focus a little
bit on the January 6th conversation,
and, really, that's the beginning part of a
segment around sort of, at least what appears
to be the evolving
how do you frame it? The Trump's
changing its stance. January 6th, Ukraine, Israel,
not and we don't know for sure until
we get past January 20th, but the point
being that, ultimately,
it's already evolved in a very dangerous way.
And so now January 6th, the point is
the pardoning of all January 6ers that were
there. Whatever your opinion on it, the statement
was made very clearly on day 1, and
a lot of conservatives are now pushing back
on that. And I think it's important. Whatever
you think about it, it's about holding I
I wanna highlight kind of the narrative of
the the the title today or the point
of this being a long term you know,
global isn't being the focus of the title,
but a lot of different stuff going on
around this. And it's all seemingly coming together,
at least as I'm seeing this. We're gonna
talk about the partisan element of all this
with a couple of different other people
also starting to show themselves, like we mentioned,
Tulsi Gabbard and the FISA warrants. There's a
lot of very unnerving things happening if there's
you know, for honest people that are willing
to hold feet to the fire, even of
those they they believe in. There's an there's
an interesting development, of course, around Andrew Tate
and the UK government, which I just I
mean, I really had to make sure I
wasn't somehow missing and this is a joke
because April 2nd. Like, what the hell is
going on? And as I was gonna put
in the title before I change it just
to make it the thing it is now,
Andrew Tate pulls a net in Yahoo because
I swear to god that's exactly what he
thinks he's doing, that he's gonna or taking
a note from Trump or anybody else or
just about every politician in history. If you
get in power and get enough power of
people behind you and then invested in your
career, well, nothing else really matters after that.
Like, we've seen with a lot of these
politicians who are using the powerful position like
Netanyahu to avoid
jail time. And as a very disgusting sex
trafficking
yeah. I'm just we'll get into it.
I I think it's very clear that this
person believed that he can get out of
it by doing this. We're gonna talk about
a lot of that and how that evolved
with the overlapping kind of partisan point, but
dovetails with an interesting conversation around
racism, I guess, and the Zionism overlap and
how that's being stoked by the Zionism machine
and Elon playing seemingly an active part in
all of that. That's not to say there's
not racism or these conversations are invalid,
but are still being used in a very
obvious way. And a lot of,
I think, team sport politics republicans are kind
of losing themselves to it because I don't
think they care about the truth, but conservatives
at large, I think, do. We're gonna talk
about a little bit of the wildfire conversation.
I think it's important some of the developments
they're in.
Talk and one of the main ones about
BlackRock and the interesting,
evolution of the conversation showing BlackRock's involvement and
how that is an interesting timing for that
with BlackRock investing more in,
DARPA's XAI, excuse me, Elon's XAI program, totally
not the same program. Trust them.
And how that shows this weird kind of
blind spot around what they don't wanna see.
Of course, partisans, as usual, from either side,
really, is how this works. We're also gonna
talk about an interesting point around
the fire location in lithium. But then we're
gonna get into a larger point in general
kind of around what I'm highlighting as all
of this comes together around the foreign policy
element. And I did put off more largely
Gaza for the most part for the next
show, but we wanna talk I wanna talk
about there's points that clearly relate to that,
but some Syria developments, some other foreign policy
development around Ukraine, around Syria,
and some different points. But really, the big
picture again is the way I titled it
today,
as always. And that's why I started with
that clip actually because I think it's really
important to see that so you guys have
seen that clip many times. Well, really just
the point of whether Sacks or anybody else
telling you the truth about Netanyahu's involvement with
US foreign policy for decades and how Israel's
been US has been fighting Israel's wars
as far back as you wanna look for
the most part, you know, post its existence.
And that's become really hard for average people
to ignore. And anybody that even cares to
look further into the truth has become, you
know, confronted full on with the reality that
this is what we live in right now
and this is how our government is responding.
And it is not about America first in
most anything that they're doing, and we should
sure as hell try to change that. But
that's my point about the people trying to
pretend they're changing that. And I'm not you
couldn't argue whether you think Trump knows or
not. I think it's quite obvious. But I
think it's interesting to see the circle around
him,
I mean,
in a very, very flamboyant way, driving them
towards all the things we thought we were
just fighting, including the Zionism control.
But interestingly, though, as all this comes together
showing how there's this massive kind of organized
effort to hide what all that shows you,
the foreign policy element, the overthrowing of countries,
the the the Greenland annexation conversation, how this
is really the the North American Union. I
mean, guys, things that are, like, major red
flag elements of what some of these large
Republican commentators have been pointing to their entire
careers that are now weirdly, ominously,
silences deafening style not pointing to it or
at least not calling it what it is.
Or call constantly talking about globalism while ignoring
the most one of the most central parts
in all of that, which is the Israeli
government.
But we're gonna talk about all of that
today. So let's start with a point about
censorship that I think is very
interesting about Twitter. Now this is just a
a quick little thing that that doom sent
me so I would can you show me
this back and forth and the timing of
it all? So quick story, long story short,
basically, this and and just so you know,
in the chat so far, there's been one
of the person that's already said they're dealing
with the same problem, and I've heard from
other people that have had similar issues, Garland
Nixon being one of them.
Steve and I have talked about this. Now
the point is basically being told that you're
not you anymore on Twitter. Now it's a
re I mean, even right now in the
moment as I say this out loud, I'm
going, woah. That's pretty weird to think about
in the context of the digital twin.
I mean, maybe experimental stuff. Like, what happens
if we pretend to be doom or pretend
to be Garland for a year? Is anyone
gonna notice? You know, I'm just this just
randomly jumped in my head. Nonetheless, all the
hypothetical aside, a lot of people are dealing
with this. Basically,
Twitter going, you're not you anymore. Prove to
us that you're you. And they go, like,
example, doom says, well, I don't have 2
factor authentication. And they go, well, we're demanding
you verify by 2 factor authentication.
Doom's like, well, that's not I don't have
that. That's I've never set that up. And
so it goes back and forth over a
minute, basically, to the point to where it
prove the the login on his account comes
from Texas all of a sudden. And so
then he goes back to them and says,
look. I didn't I'm not in Texas. This
person just logged in. I'm not in control
of my account. And they basically say, no.
You're wrong. You are. Leave us alone. I
mean, more to the story, but that was
a quick truncation of it. But think about
how frustrating that is. Or espe for someone
like Garland Nixon, by the way, who has
a very large following and is show doing
his shows and and all of a sudden,
they're like, guess what? You're not you anymore.
I think that's wild. Now,
I guess at square 1, you can just
say that's really stupid for in a business
to conduct themselves this way. And, you know,
maybe mistakes can happen. Right? And if you
don't know and we haven't heard us talk
about it, Garland Nixon, I think, what, going
on a year, has not had access to
access to his Twitter account.
That's crazy. And he has tried. Apparently, he's
going into some kind of legal action around
it. I just don't know how you could
pretend that that's anything other than a choice.
It's just crazy. And then, especially, since we
keep seeing more of these. On on top
of the
embarrassingly obvious censorship that just happened. So there's
no denying that censorship is clearly happening. There
never really was,
but there was such an
the h one overlap, there was such a
clear example of it that even people trying
to pretend it didn't happen were still were
forced to call it out. So I just
wanna point this out that I think it's
really interesting. Here's the,
basically, he he followed up in the comments
right before we went live saying no more
Twitter for him. They emailed him saying that
they that he does have control over his
account even though he sent them the email
showing that no he lost somebody logged in
from Texas.
I just think this is really incredible that
we're at a point now where,
you know, they're literally trying to argue that
the importance of what they're doing is to
make sure they know you're you. Right? And
then you got people that are literally going
through the process to go, like like I
mean, whether it started because of their mistake
or their deliberate action or not, going like,
okay. Fine. You forced me. Here's me. I'm
me. Here's my whatever you're asking for. And
they go, never you're not you.
I that that does to show you that
they are failing at their authentication or they're
trying to tweak something or that it is
really some deliberate action to box out doom
or to kick out Garland Nixon or because
some Israeli bot decided to go after them
because clearly is
Pitter is not just okay with that. They're
bolstering the CHEQ Israeli bot dynamic that censored
man and plenty of others called out.
Very interesting. Now there's another point I wanna
show the oh, just get in general to
show you the
the account. So this is the account we're
talking about. So as of right now, and
then speaking of that, I'm gonna unfollow him
for the time being.
That's his account. He's no longer in control
of it. He's a he's a, you know,
central part of the of our audience in
the show. He's always in the show. He's
always helping with research. He's always background everything.
This he's one of the people that is
part of this kind of TLAB family we
have.
So if you're watching this account and you
start to see some strange things happen, just
take note and wonder why that might be
happening and start to and then keep an
eye on whether there's an agenda around it.
And I think they'll start to develop about
whether this is some anomalous random thing or
if it's a deliberate action. So, anyway, I
wanna keep it there.
Censorship is everywhere, and we'll get to that
more as we go through today in general.
But on that point about censorship, Elon Musk
wants you to know who the bad guys
are. The autism capital seems to be one
of the most pandering Elon or Elon pandering
type accounts out there right now. Elon Musk,
it says, it's very easy to tell, who's
they're quoting Elon, who the bad guys are.
Who wants to stop freedom of speech? Those
are the bad guys. Well, you know what,
Elon? I happen to agree. And then Alice
speaks up and says, the first thing Adolf
Hitler did was cut off free speech. The
first thing he did when he got power
is cut off the media, and he had
not done and Elon comes in and says
he was just a shutdown. He was just
trying to shut down any pro semitic
media.
He didn't want any defend
I just can't even stomach the way that
they frame these things. They wanted defense to
the Jewish people. Those who want censorship have
to be very careful for what they wish
it for when they start censoring. One day,
a censure will turn on you. It's like,
I just can't even read it out. It
it's not honest.
He does not believe any of that because
he's censoring people. And it almost makes it
hard to stomach because you know that. Even
the people fanboying for him know that. And
yet he can stand there and go, we're
the good guys because we don't do the
thing that you all know we're doing and
you secretly cheer when I do it. Yay.
That's so infuriatingly
it just it makes me it's kinda gross,
really. When you get into this stuff, the
partisan elements of this stuff, it really does
turn my stomach. It's the kinda gross nature
of the of human nature that we're being
bombarded with, but it's not the majority, in
my opinion. But nonetheless, the point is the
bad guys did it. Hitler, free speech, censorship.
We're the good guys. Like, you know, just
the buzzword buzzword kinda stuff. Well, Elon says
exactly, or his bot did anyway. Got it
29,000,000 views, of course, because that means we're
the good guys.
Or it doesn't though because you're doing that.
Easy point. But it's just so it's so
infuriating the fake reality that people are living
in right now, whether it's Musk or Biden
or Trump or anybody.
We live in a world right now where
where they're it's like the children in the
room are being allowed to run, you know,
however you wanna frame it. Like, the people
that are the least informed, the least aware,
and I don't think because they want to
be, I don't think they care, are the
ones being leaned into. Just like even one
of the Weinstein's said before the election. Basically,
pointing to the fact that both sides were
actively
fanning their most radical elements and both pretending
like they weren't there. Now I'm no fan
of the Weinstein's quite frankly, but overall, he's
right. And you can absolutely see them both
doing that. And then my point is usual
when you stand back even further, you recognize
it's just your government fanning the crazies.
It's not once you you love to cut
it down the middle and pretend like it's
just the government fanning the wild ones out
there and pretending they're out there because it
works for them. And that's what's happening here,
is they just continue to pretend well, I
mean, that's the first part, and then him
standing on top of it all and acting
like we're the ones saving everybody.
And it's not just Elon is the point.
But, of course, as you well know, whether
it's the or whatever else. Now there's arguments
to be made about whether they violate terms
of service,
but the the the absurd reality of all
this, because the game they're playing now is
they they were they violated some kind of
fate interestingly enough, overlaps with the person dynamic,
whether maybe they're not real people or they're
on a network or whatever. But you know
who else was? And and it was
outright shown online when this was happening. The
Loomers and the DC Trainos and the Cat
Turds. Yeah. They're all on their own exact
same version of this on the conservative side.
Or I guess, technically, this is the wrong
example. This is the conservative side too. But
what was the other one? The oh, like
the anyway, there was an example of the
left leaning one they were all calling out.
My point is that you can argue this,
but then it's being selectively applied if that's
what you think. And on top of that,
they're conservatives anyway, and many of them were
supporting what they thought Elon was doing before
he shifted tone. Nonetheless,
that's all the narrative around it. These people
were censored anyway.
And most of them were not doing something
you could argue even came close to violent
in terms of service. They maybe just said
things that were gross or racist or whatever.
And I'm not I'm just speaking generally because
or rather what people are saying about it
even.
To my because you know my opinion.
I can I'll say things are gross if
I think they're gross or racist, but I'll
say you have the right to do those
things or say those things because that's free
speech.
To be clear, do those things meaning say
them out loud. It's all I meant. The
bottom line is that is what free speech
actually looks like. Now let's not forget, on
Twitter, as APAC tracker showed a while ago,
TLav have TLav had over 60
restriction censorship tags on its account, which they
no longer show you. The same thing happened
with Grok recently where they started to show
you what his negativity thing would look like
until they kinda pulled back the reins on
that. Like, we're it's like this ebb and
flow of using this thing between us, and
they're learning every time we do this. Nonetheless,
it still gives us insight.
Now lastly, for this open part, I just
wanted to highlight a good note that at
what least it appears to be. And as
usual, I'm very, very jaded and pessimistic when
it comes to the what governments are doing,
and I rarely ever think it's because they're
just going, I see the right thing.
I hope I'm wrong. I mean, I'd like
to believe there are good people in positions,
but I point one out to me and
we can go forward. But, nonetheless, the point
is EU scientific advisers
call for a moratorium on solar geoengineering. So
it's a good thing regardless. The fact that
they're being forced to say it out loud
or that they want to do this is
good.
My point is even opportunism, like I say
in Israel, it still forces change if we
can just be cautious about leaning in or
ever believing in addressing a politician. But it's
such an important thing to hear.
They're call and if you read it, they're
basically saying, guys, this is crazy, which is
exactly
what I have been saying forever, what Derek
has been saying twice as long.
This is bad. What you're doing is hurting
things. And we all know that in a
general sense, but when you dive into it,
to the actual status stratospheric
aerosol injection, which is one main aspect of
solar geoengineering, which is not the exact same
as geoengineering. That's the broader umbrella.
The point is that you get into it,
and I've talked about this. Their own studies
show that it's most likely that you're gonna
get into this practice and it will become
an issue where if you stop,
the problem you thought would be there would
be come back 10 times worse or whatever
the number was. It would be worse if
you stopped. And they basically go, well, we're
all gonna die in 5 years anyways. We
that's not true though. You see, they're and
if they believe that, then they're even more
stupid than you think. I think they're more
nefarious than anything and they know that's that's
not true. Nonetheless, the point is they're they're
trapping you in some kind of, like,
like, a like a mRNA vaccine cycle for
a human, like, for the for the world.
Like, you have to keep taking this injection.
This stratos it's actually even called an injection,
coincidentally.
I'm just kinda making an interesting overlapping joke,
but the point is the same. You get
stuck on this and the world demands that
you have to keep doing this. Otherwise, the
problem gets worse if the problem was even
there without it in the first place.
I don't believe that. I know we're hurting
this planet, but I don't believe what they're
putting forward. Nonetheless, the point is they're going,
we need to pause all of this because
of the same reason.
The EU scientists are saying, look. We don't
know what we're doing here. This is gonna
cause a huge problem. It may have benefits,
but we don't know. Thank god at least
somebody has the courage to say that out
loud. It's like talking about 5 gs and
going, Look, they've never studied this and we
all know that, and yet it all rolled
out anyway. Wow.
I just don't know how people can still
be in or I'm barely even starting the
show and I'm already frustrated with this. People
cannot see how obvious it is. The government
is constantly, constantly lying to you and constantly
doing things for their interest at your expense.
All of it. This is just one positive
direction. Now, my point is, it may just
be trying to
release some steam,
hoping that you stop paying attention, maybe because
we're all calling it out, but it doesn't
change the fact that it's a positive step
and that we need to use that. It's
a stepping stone. Even with them giving something
just to get us to stop pushing back,
the point is don't stop pushing back.
Don't let that be the release valve that
goes, okay, good. We're done. No. We're never
done. Stand up and push harder. Now we
need more. Now we need to stop doing
this, and now we need more of because
they're not gonna stop. And in the United
States, it's only going harder, guys. This is,
yes, 2023. But understand that even in Tennessee,
where we have our stop spraying our skies
bill, I see more geoengineering
in the skies than I do than I
ever did before.
Now maybe that's because they the law itself,
which I mean, I'd like to believe there's
some people in Tennessee that are better than
other places, but I'm just as quest skeptical.
And maybe it's just because all they did
was simply cement in the law a way
to do it elsewhere. This is how this
always goes. You know, if you read the
bill, it's basically about a specific type of
geoengineering. And so if all we do is
spray above a certain level, then it doesn't
count for the bill. That's literally how this
works, and they all know this.
Nonetheless, the bill was still a good step.
That's my point. That wasn't the end of
it. That didn't just stop geoengineering,
clearly.
My point though in general is in the
United States, it's only gonna get worse because
they're not even slowing down. At least some
place in the world are really starting to
call it out. You know, sort of like
with the pew puberty blockers and whatever else,
they're like, oh my god. We're killing everybody
over here, and the US is still, like,
pushing it on Fox News. Right? It's different,
like, way behind. And I don't think it's
because they're unaware.
It's just because they don't care about you.
Now a note on censorship to start as
well, which I should have done this before
the geoengineering part
geoengineering part.
Ray from,
Bitshoot, CEO of Bitshoot tweets this out, basically
saying excited about our new chat bombs on
Bitshoot. So if you're right now tuned in
on Bitshoot, check it out. It's a you
know, like a,
what do you call it now? Super chat
on on on, YouTube.
You know, basically, you can just give us
a donation in the chat, give us a
comment. I'm not necessarily paying attention to any
really any of the
video brought the, you know, Rumble Rumble or
BitChute or anything else. I'm I'm typically looking
at my StreamYard
embed. Nonetheless, though, if I do glance at
it, I'll reference some of the comments that
you have there. But anything you do to
support this platform will continue to grow this
platform and write more content and do investigations.
So thank you all for your support, and
thank you, BitShoot, to continue supporting TLav.
Now starting with January 6th,
in the we're still in the kinda partisan
element of all this. I think this is
really important because there's been a lot of
shifts.
And just like I was saying in the
first place, we don't know until we actually
get there. But nonetheless, it is still reportable.
And this is kinda a funny dynamic you're
gonna see the whole time, where when this
first started, what do we get? You know,
Trump's gonna end the war in Israel. He's
gonna end the war in Ukraine. Day 1.
Day 1, pardon all the January sixers. Okay.
Certainly possible. Right? People like myself came out
and were like, well, you know, I don't
think so. I didn't seem that way. Look
at what he said about this elsewhere. And
they go, no. He said it. He said
it. Trump's gonna do it because that's Trump.
You know? A a lot of them. Plenty
of of objective people too in the conservative
field were like, well, let's wait and see.
But you guys know just as well as
I, a lot of people were shouting you
down because, see, he said this or he
said that about Ukraine. And we all saw
it. We talked about it. Now it comes
around where suddenly he shifts his opinion, and
he starts going, well, no. We are gonna
keep funding the Ukraine war. Well, we are
gonna cut off aid to Israel. Well, obviously,
we can see how that's gonna go. Or
January 6th, we start to see the tapering
down of that. I'll show you the evolution
of it. Here's the funny part. Now
we go, okay, well, now he said this
to the people that were telling us before.
He said that. And they go, well, you've
jumped at the gun. It's not even January
20th. Yeah. We don't even know yet. It's
like, hold on a minute. You just told
me
it's this funny evolution
of the way that the partisan mind works.
I'm always been on the same point. I'm
not we don't know until it gets passed
January 20th. But based on their logic, the
first point was he said this and we
know. And so now he says something different.
And so I go back to them and
say, well, here. He said this now. And
they act like you're the one jumping the
gun.
You don't you know, some of them don't
even know they're doing it, but I argue
most people that are doing that are they
know somewhere in mind they're being dishonest about
it. They just don't wanna admit these people
aren't what they want them to be. And
I totally get that. Just don't lie to
yourselves about it. We've all been through this,
guys. We all fall back into it. It's
just human nature. Just try to be honest
with yourself about what you're dealing with. It's
not your fault that these people tried to
believe trick you into believing they were who
you wanted them to be by playing that
out.
Now, Matt Orfel put this out, and he's
he he always did a great job kind
of clipping out these things and, you know,
kind of calling these politicians out and, usually,
on both sides. Now this is important because
this he's this is at politics and prose
in in the in the bookstore, and he's
sitting there talking about January 6th. There's a
guy who wrote a book about this. And
Matt was there. He asked a question. But
in general, I'll just play this one clip
for you. But he has a whole thread
about the conversation. He calls him out at
the end again in a letter enough to
to get him on record saying the opposite
of what we know is true. It's it's
really good. So first, listen to the clip.
Now this is not not not not about
Trump and not about the walking back of
the thing yet. That's the next part. This
is just to show you that they're still
pushing the BS around this. And the idea
that I I mean, one of it is
that arguing people died even though we know
even that's they've been walked back, that it
peep it was natural cause and nothing to
do with that other than, you you know,
he was there and stressed out. You can
argue. Even but even the autopsy went on
to say that wasn't the case. But on
top of that,
the idea that he blindly takes at face
value
wall Washington Post. And he even says it.
I can't even believe it. He says it
at face value. He says it explicitly.
I do not question Washington Post. Think about
that.
His point is we are supposed to question
the ones that I'm told are not real
sources. The Independents. Right? But Washington post, his
job is to believe them at face value.
That's what honest, you know, the adults in
the room do. There's a lot of people
that actually believe this. And you want the
truth? Those people are the most lost in
the room.
They're the ones that believe they're in the
know, but they they have this superior mindset
because they think the the real smart people
listen to the Washington Post and read the
CDC.
But they're more lost than anybody because I
think a lot of us are beginning to
understand.
What's funny though is there's people on the
extreme side of that, on the opposite side,
who are just as lost,
who disregard everything the CDC says, who disregard
everything the Washington Post says without even checking.
That's just as lost, by the way. Nonetheless,
though, to this side of it, here's what
he had to say.
We think we have time for one more
question.
Coming in from the back.
How you doing?
So I just wanna follow-up on something you
said earlier. You said there's no equivalence between
the BLM protests and the January 6th,
riots.
So,
my question is, like, how can you say,
you know, aside from all the property damage
in the burned homes,
how do you see the violence is worse,
at the capitol compared to BLM protests,
when
many people were killed in the BLM slash
antifa protests,
but nobody but the protesters didn't kill anybody
on January 6th.
And just one short follow-up question if I
may.
You mentioned in the book
that, the issue with misinformation
on social media, which everyone would agree is
an issue. Are you concerned about misinformation from,
you know, sources like the local paper of
note, The Washington Post, which
did give everyone the false impression
that
the protesters had murdered
had killed somebody,
on January 6th.
He died the following day of natural causes.
The post did
did, make that correction many months later, but
most people didn't get get that update. Anyway,
thank you. Yeah. Thank you for the question.
I'm not concerned about misinformation from The Washington
Post. I I generally trust The Washington Post
and other credible sources of I mean, just
think about saying that out loud today.
That you I mean, that's not that's not
or that's I don't know whether you're a
writer. I don't care whether you're I mean,
I guess, technically, you could try to make
an argument for somebody who only sees themselves
as, say, like, a writer.
But, nonetheless, if you're if you're a nonfiction
writer, then you should care about facts. And
that way and trusting at face value, I
guess you my I'm the only thing I'm
trying to say is that somebody who sees
themselves as a writer might think their job
is to not do the research, but rather
just report what the people who they think
are the researchers say. But that's still a
lazy way out of it. That so you're
still, you know, basically
outsourcing
the research to them.
And I I still and that's I'm generally
saying that to be objective. I still think
arguably any re
like, even a non even a fiction writer.
Like, you still have to care about facts.
Either way, the point is, he's simply telling
you that and and, look, and I should
add add one more thing. This is not
some book about, you know, geography or history.
This is a book about a very a
very serious
false flag event, which I must be called
what it is. A very serious event that
was a massive propaganda event. So he's writing
about that. Let's that that's you can't act
like it's not your job to check the
facts. And if you trust the Wall Street
Journal, the Washington Post, knowing that they've been
rampantly showing fake information and been caught for
it, whether just Israel or plenty of other
examples, or January 6th, which he makes a
point about,
then you're part of the machine. And, like,
that's the point, I think. Right? I I
don't think this either this person decided to
do this book and kinda got didn't care.
Like, just he's a mainstream one. Just went
along with the mainstream narrative and didn't care
to buck anything. That's not a real journalist
or a real writer, in my opinion. Or
he got tapped to do it. In any
case, that's an important thing to say. And
that's not new, mind you. Ask Alison Morrow.
If you're in that field, the mainstream side
of it, you you're told you know who
you're supposed to listen to and who you're
supposed to ignore. Ask Tucker Carlson. He did
it well.
Information. There were people who died
as a direct result of their involvement in
protecting the capital.
So that's not misinformation.
And I don't mean to suggest on the
BLM protest in the summer of 2020 that
they weren't serious, that they weren't worthy of
a strong response, that shouldn't have been held
accountable. They absolutely were. My point is that
they were just sort of fundamentally different than
an attack on the seat of government. They're
they're just a fundamentally different
dynamic.
Curious
how you think
that one is worse, file
And I am curious who, like, you say
you trust everything in The Washington Post, and
then you also say Sicknick, Foster Sicknick
was,
killed
associates
through something that happened during the riot,
but the coast itself
followed up much later and said he died
of natural causes. No. Brian the the medical
examiner found that officer Signick died as a
result of exposure to the chemical agents and
and the
the stress of defending the capital exacerbating a
preexisting condition. That's a a legal conclusion that
I trust, that The Washington Post didn't make
up.
No. I'm saying The Washington Post is So
just so it's clear, the reason it's low,
they took the microwave the microwave from him
at a bookstore.
I he's just people are such cowards, you
know, and he's not even being contentious. He's
asking a very good question. Because as you
can see on the screen, and I'll show
in the next tweet, this is this is
from the Washington Post. It says, in an
interview with the Washington Post,
Francisco Diaz, the medical examiner,
said the autopsy found, quote, no evidence the
42 year old officer suffered an allergic reaction
to chemical irritants.
No evidence of internal or external injuries. The
guy just had a stroke
well after the event. They're just straight up
lying to this very day. How do you
not see that? Now on top of that,
if you're a conservative,
the whole point was to make you guys
out to be domestic terrorists, racist, nazi, antisemites.
You're literally doing that right now to another
group. You are literally scapegoating another group in
the same way, and it's already turning back
against you in in part of your group.
Just anybody honest in this group has to
start calling this stuff out, and I know
most of you are. I'm I'm just I
mean, I guess, sadly, I feel like I'm
aiming it at the team sport Republicans that
don't seem to ever care about the truth.
But, hey, maybe they want to. Maybe they'll
see it. The point is that you guys
know what's going on here. And I it's
starting to burn down around everybody. I mean,
I'm seeing conservatives left and right call this
stuff out. Wild to me.
Now this is Matt continuing on. Just simply
saying he took the microphone away but he
pushed the issue and there's the if you
want the actual link and the image, it's
all included here in the thread.
But then he goes up to he goes
up to him afterward. Person to person, like,
meant to sign the book, you know? Asked
him again.
And explicitly asked about the what he was
referring to, and he cited the autopsy of
the examiner
from the Washington post article. So that means
he either knows he's lying
or he never even read the article.
Pretty wild.
But that's what that's the world we live
in, guys. And I mean, the guy, you
know, he he comes across as an,
you know, doesn't seem contentious, doesn't seem angry.
You know, he has a good presence for
trying to relay these fake the fake narratives.
Right? But that's what they do today.
Now on the point of January 6th, let's
kinda go through quickly 3, I think, 3
videos that show you the evolution of these
claims. Now as I said jokingly before,
no one here is taking at face value
the statements.
He could mean them. He could be lying.
He'd be trying to troll somebody. He could
be doing it to get a better reaction
of another deal, or he could just change
his mind, or somebody could change his mind
for him after because of another data point.
Nonetheless, the point is that he says one
thing and now he's saying another. That has
to matter, guys. To anybody honest about this,
it has to matter. And as as always,
the point for anybody who's trying to really
cut through the BS to somebody who might
be open to the reality, you know damn
well if this was a democrat who did
this, they would be ripping them apart. And
so that's I I I would I tried
to find a meme today that I I
lost.
It's an old meme, but they repackaged it,
but it just shows the hard to swallow
pill bottle. And then beneath it, it just
says, Donald Trump is a deep state puppet
rolling out the n w o agenda that
you wouldn't accept if it was democrat. It's
like, that's so perfect. It's just it's exactly
what we're all trying to say That if
this was Hillary Clinton or Kamala Harris, you
guys would be pulling your hair out.
And and rightly so. Because doesn't I I
it's it's not just bad because they're the
one doing it. I mean, that's a crazy
way to look at it. It's the same
agenda.
So here's here's what he said on and
this is at least post on the 7th
of last of September 7th last year. Declares
that he will pardon all of them.
The moment we win, we will rapidly review
the cases of every political prisoner unjustly victimized
by the Harris regime, and I will sign
their pardons on day 1. I will sign
it on day 1.
Alright. Well, you know, in fairness, he does
say he will rapidly review,
but he does say on day 1, we
will sign them. It doesn't seem to parse
out, you know, violent versus not. You know?
And it's a rally. Whatever. I'm not trying
to go out. Like I said, it's just
these are floated terms. I guess the point
we should always make that I'm always aware
of that I'm trying to highlight why some
people in the partisan field wanna ignore or
don't care about it when it's their side
is that this is what all politicians do.
They stand there and they're bombastic and they
go, we're gonna change the world and we're
gonna give you all free money and we're
gonna you know, it's like whatever. It's getting
you all charged up and sometimes it kinda
happens. Mostly we know it's more just by
we all actually know that, except when we
don't wanna see it in our chosen ideologue
or the people that still do that.
So
here is the next one.
Now this was it's a thread, but this
one is, this a little bit later. He's
posted on December 18th, and it's it's with
a meet the press interview. And it's a
little bit different. You'll see you'll see the
difference.
It's illegal for them to delete
Let me ask you about January 6th in
a in a different capacity. Okay? The I
think you're gonna wanna answer this question. You
promised to pardon those who attacked the capitol
on January 6th. Are you still
vowing to follow through with that promise? We're
looking at it right now. Most likely. Yeah.
Well, you know Those people have suffered long
and hard,
and there may be some exceptions to it.
I have to look. But, you know I'm
already right there, which I'm I'm I would
argue makes sense.
Right? I mean, I trust me. I'll and
I'll I'll bring it up at the end.
I totally agree.
It's not up to it's it's it's objectively
clear that this was something that was being
op in operation.
I don't even know. I there's few events
in history that have this many obvious standouts.
But the point
is that there's there's still people that technically
broke the law. There's still people there that
you he might argue would make I mean,
I don't whether you agree with it or
not, objectively, you could argue that not just
blanket bay I mean, that would be politically
dangerous for him probably because people would use
to go after him. Whether you agree with
it or not, I'm not even saying I
agree with that. I'm just saying logically, that
wouldn't be something people would go that crazy
about. But that's what you're seeing
because of obvious reasons. Because already you have
conservatives going, that's not what you promised. You
just said you advanced day 1 no matter
what. And now all of a sudden, it's
like, well, you know, maybe some maybe some
of that's that's a deviation
whether,
logical or not. You know, if somebody was,
radical, crazy,
that might be What was that promise? We're
looking at it right now, most likely. Yeah.
Well, you know Those people have suffered long
and hard,
and there may be some exceptions to it.
I have to look. But, you know, if
somebody was, radical, crazy,
there might be some people from Antifa there.
I don't know. Yep. Ah, what a well
played moment at the end there. Okay. So
the point is radical crazy.
Now if he hadn't have included the Antifa
part, oh, that would be pretty dangerous. Right?
Because what are you suggesting? That there's radical
crazy elements in our movement, Trump? You know,
with some of them yes. Yes. There are
on both sides. But the point is that
that's not
that would suggest that he's giving an opening
to boxing out some of the more extreme
elements in there, which is exactly what the
media is trying to highlight, which would seem
at least I'm trying to frame what they're
seeing I'm seeing online, which is that that's
kind of a betrayal. That's how they would
see it, whatever you think about it. But
then, of course, he goes, but, you know,
like Antifa. And they go, okay. He only
met them. That's the only one he met.
Oh, you don't know that. You don't know
that.
You could always give a pass if you
want to. I have somebody close to me
that used to always go, well, he must
have something that makes that make sense. Oh,
you always have that answer even though there's
nothing there.
Object well, he must have something. Well, he
must, you know, I don't know why you
must think that. But in any case,
it goes on from there, and this is
the most recent one. Let's get more attention
today. This is from this posted on January
7th.
It goes, there you have it. Trump said
he will pardon January 6 defendants that did
nothing but sit in jail now while the
people that did terrible things are free.
Now, this is the
What was this again? I I'm sure I
I think I remember where I'm playing it.
But this is the most recent. First, you
said, on your 1st day of office, you're
going to pardon January 6th defendants. Are you
planning to pardon those who were charged with
violent offenses? I don't know. Just for answers,
again, you're not gonna get an answer. You
know, but I think the reason I read
what he said, it's hilarious to me because
he really didn't say this at all. This
is the most non answer I've seen from
him in a long time. But it get
people just get what they want from it.
Despite him already muddying the waters and it's
already been sort of chain I mean, it's
already been openly discussed with fans and everybody
else. But this is the one we already
played, where it's
basically, well, people were there and and stuff,
and and then that's supposed to be the
answer.
Of office with violent offenses. Well, we're looking
at it, and we have other people in
there. And as you see, I guess, 24
or 28 people. I'm not joking. That's the
answer. He goes off on the fact that
there were FBI. Of course, there were. We've
been saying that since the first few the
first week of this, in fact. Because don't
forget, as he as Jimmy's called out as
well, there are people in congress that made
this clear right in the beginning. It got
kind of recycled to some new bombshell because
that's how this partisan controlled media works today.
But it was very clear.
The point is that that's the answer. Well,
we have people in there.
I mean, watch. The time and you see
it too. People that were doing some bad
things weren't prosecuted,
and people that didn't even walk into the
building are in jail right now. We all
know this.
We all know this. So the point is
you've already heard him walk back the violent
part in the other one. I know. So
we'll be looking at the whole thing, but
I'll be, making major pardons. Yes. Okay. So
he didn't address the question. You see my
point? So he'll be making pardons. So that
and and all I'm trying to highlight for
those that are new to this is this
is what conservatives have been calling out. I'm
watching this online.
They're very and I'm gonna show you one
right now. Very unhappy about this. And, again,
whether or not you think he should do
blanket pardons, that's what was promised. And so
now you're getting people that are coming out
going, well, that's not what they said, and
getting almost attacked by TeamSport Politics Republicans going,
well, you don't expect it to just pardon
everybody.
Well, that is what he said though. So
shouldn't we all be on the same page?
I just find it very telling to see
how this is evolving. And my larger point,
as always, is the democrat, republican guys, these
are all just terms. Your government is using
you against yourselves. They are literally playing you
against yourselves because this is exactly what we've
been seeing. The globalist, the Zionist, the technocrat
agenda that we're watching roll out in front
of us merge together. And all the people
that used to pretend to be fighting it
well before it was even possible, it seems,
in the context of what we're seeing today,
are suddenly blank, are suddenly lost in this
Elon Musk ecosphere.
I wondered why. At least some people have
the courage to call it out.
Trump and Vance coming into office. Right?
They ran on this platform that they were
day 1. Day 1, ladies and gentlemen. We're
gonna we're gonna port on all j sixers.
Now JD Vance is on, and Trump has
said it too, is on the news saying,
oh, we're gonna go through it case by
case because we can't
we can't release
the violent ones. Right? And he did I
I didn't ravage because it was basically exactly
that. Advance just saying case by case is
what he said, I think, on what was
it? MSNBC?
But but they want you to unequivocally support
Israel no matter how many women they kill,
no matter how many children they kill, no
matter how many hospitals, schools, refugee camps, they
fucking
just blow to shit.
Now notice an obvious threat here, guys. It
clearly seems to me the well, I would
call it the honest side of this conversation,
but let's just remove that part for different
opinions.
It obviously seems to be a thread between
the conservative that are capable, willing
to call out what we're seeing here, who
also I mean, the the alignment seems to
be they're also the ones that are capable
of seeing Israel's genocide.
I don't think that's an accident. I think
it's quite obvious that what we're seeing right
there, what that highlights for you, is the
Zionists in this conversation are dishonest.
And they've overtaken a lot of the Republican
side of this, as well as the Democrats
side. How about just your government, guys? And
so the problem is you get a lot
of these leader elements
in the rulership that convince other people in
the movements to follow their lead. But people
like this aren't buying it because he's not
stupid. Now I'm I'm not very familiar with
his work, but all I'm showing you is
that he's able to go, yes. There's an
effing genocide that we all see. And they're
trying to tell you it's all good. Don't
worry about that. But over here, we can't
pardon violent January sixers that barely I mean,
think about the violence they're talking about at
that event.
And then think about the violence we're talking
about in in Israel, Palestine.
You can't miss his point. What I'm highlighting
is that clearly the ones that are capable
of seeing Israel for what they are are
honest or capable of seeing through the side
over here. That to me, that's the majority
right there. That's the average people. That's the
real base
of all sides.
And and then what we're battling against is
this kind of controlled mainstream alternative media, partisan
kind of club, big club, and you ain't
in it for real,
that that everyone seems to be highlighting right
now.
But what? They want you to unequivocally support
Israel no matter how many women they kill,
no matter how many children they kill, no
matter how many fucking hospitals, schools, refugee camps
they fucking just blow to shit, no matter
how many fucking prisoners they butt rape,
Americans are supposed to support that kind of
fucking violence unequivocally,
but they don't wanna fucking pardon j sixers
who push some fucking cops around. Tell me
how that one fucking works.
Sorry, guys. I completely just dropped the ball
right there on the cussing. My
completely forgot I'm sorry about that. Genuinely genuinely,
for those that watch the show on the
regular, for maybe new as well, I a
lot of people watch this. I I try
to make this family friendly. I I never
cuss unless it's an accident, and that was
just my mistake. So I apologize for that.
I just wasn't thinking about it. But usually,
we try to at least warn you at
a time when there's gonna be a clip
like that. But, you know, there is cussing
in the world, so I apologize if your
children accidentally heard that. But the important point
here,
clearly, he's upset about this. And he has
every right to me. Because I I I'm
willing to bet you if I'm reading it
correctly is he's feeling slightly betrayed by people
he thought he was in line with. Right?
Because he clearly has morals enough to see
a genocide when it's happening. And people in
that same group are acting like it's not
only not okay that it's not only not
wrong. It's okay. It's good. It's the right
thing. It's what god wants. Yeah. And that
is talk about a a line too far.
Come on. I mean, that's it's crazy.
Now I've look. I'm looking back. I do
I think I remember his name's Ian Smith.
I remember him more from
I think it was more during the COVID
19 time frame, but it's medical cannabis and
so on. I gotta check back and remember
why I fell on him in the first
place. But, I mean, clearly, I mean,
see, I I just saw this in passing,
and I'm like, yeah. This guy gets it.
And he says, riddle me this, JD Vance.
And then Steven Steele says, chill, bro. They
haven't even taken office yet, let's see what
happens. And that's the joke I was making
before. How much you wanna bet if you
check out Steele's account,
how he'd be, yeah, he said he's gonna
part them all. Oh my god, look at
him. I mean, I'm I'm I'm not even
assuming, I'm just trying to make a joke
about it. I'm willing to bet you that
there's a lot of people out there who
are right now saying
that,
hold on. Let's wait and see. Now that
they get the thing they don't like, we're
the ones pushing that you should believe in
when he said the one they wanted. Typical
partisanship. But good on Ian for calling this
out. Here's some other responses.
Born crazy says, so we can pardon a
convicted Israeli spy who US secrets to the
Soviets,
but cannot pardon a bunch of guys who
rioted. And that's honestly not even really what
happened when you understand the way this went
down. But
Israel's or at Israel's request, Trump pardons Israeli
handler of spy, Jonathan Pollard.
Yep. Or how about plenty of other war
criminals or people that don't know do not
deserve to be pardoned? But we have to
mince words about the people on January 6th
that were literally taken advantage of.
See, it is pretty wild. I gotta admit.
I mean, it's it's pretty obvious. Now Nick
Fuentes chimed in as his little group is
the one that got censored, the the or
whatever. That's one of those major groupings that
got just completely kicked off this platform.
He says, Trump's team says no blanket pardon
for January 6th protesters. If true, this would
be the first and possibly most evil betrayal
of the second Trump presidency. Well, hardly the
first. I mean, if we're gonna talk about
betrayals that haven't yet come to pass since
not January 20th, this is the third, I
I would argue. But either way, it says
a spokesman says
case by case basis.
Again, back to the origin point, You may
think that's how this should go. Or, logically,
that might even be the smartest way to
do it if you're not trying to lean
into one side or the other. Maybe maybe,
you know, like he's as he said, there's
Antifa people there. Right? You can't just blanket
what they were there too. Don't you want
the Democrats to be held accountable? You see
a point? You can clearly see how there's
a logical point to be made about why
that's the way it should go. But all
I'm trying to point out is they said
day 1, and that all will be pardoned.
Because they knew that that would get you
emotionally riled up. And arguably, was aiming at
the lower the lowest common denominator.
Because I wouldn't believe that. You go, probably
not. He said it, so it's nice, but
I don't think that's gonna happen, and here
we are. You know, this is what people
who are involved in Everybody knows that's how
they play this game, but a lot of
people fell for it. Because a lot of
newer people have been Like, I wrote an
article,
let's see.
Here, let me grab let me grab,
the January 6th article, so I'll see if
I can grab this one. I wrote an
article a while ago about this, right when
Trump got elected in fact. Now, this, here,
let me do these first.
Just I always grab these 2 because it's
it's kind of the evolution of my coverage
on January 6th.
And I'll do this real quick while we're
searching for that. And it was
so this is
the first one. January 6th, the false flag
meant to blame Russia and you using the
CIA grown Azov battalion. Quickly, if you don't
remember, the Azov movement that is running Ukraine,
excuse me, it
the rise above movement that marched through Charlottesville,
that's the US arm of the Azov movement
that's funded by Israel and the United States
through the CIA and through Assad. It's it's
an open secret. It's very easy to prove.
I've done this so many times.
This is the article. This is the show
covering the CIA documents that prove they were
funding the fascist elements in Ukraine since at
least 1948
and Israel as well. But the point is
that they were trying to use this to
blame the conservative movement in this country and
tie it to Russia. I'm pretty sure that
blew up in their face. So they shifted
into using them, acting like they weren't Nazis
all of a sudden, but the point is
that got very clearly shown at the actual
capital
point as this developed fur further.
That you have Sergei Benignin from the Ukraine,
the Azov movement who was there with Jake
Chanceley Chanceley.
Right? Who was on video screaming, let's go
in Russian, go into the capital even though
he's Ukrainian. Yeah. There's an overlap, but the
point was you can clearly see this was
a setup.
And this guy from Antifa being or whatever
the group was on video saying we tricked
them. We got them to go in. Blah
blah blah. I mean, you could argue these
are different moving parts.
Overall though, guys, it's undeniably she this is
so clear. With Ray Epps, with the many
FBI agents, with the psychological operations officer that
was there, and so many points that aren't
even being brought up in conservative circles. We
covered them live on the show.
Very important to see that.
Let's see. Here we go. This one. I
wrote this a long time ago back when
I was writing more articles before I did
the show.
And this is called
the divide of the uninformed
and the manipulation of a nation. Now my
thought on this when I wrote this was
sort of the idea that Donald Trump was
being tapped to play this, you know like,
remember when I when he came out, it
was all about, you know, and the fed
911, JFK. He he was tapping into that
conspiracy base that largely was very dismissive politics,
rightly so, because we were like we are
right now again, there was a moment where
they were like, this is all BS. Like,
you know, at least that big untapped market.
And he leaned into it and people are
like, he's different. He's the one. That he
got the libertarians. He got it not all,
but a lot of that movement fell into
it. And I'm I'm not saying libertarian uniform.
I'm saying the people that were not normally
ever voting. A person well, somebody that rarely
ever even turned on politics and the TV
suddenly started caring because of Trump.
And these people then went on acting like
their political world began in 2016
without even
barely understanding history around our country, let alone
foreign policy.
And that's not unique to location or color
or anything like that. The point is it
was the manipulation of this country using this,
tapping into what is what? The north the
the 45%
of people that never vote.
Suddenly, you see a change. Now, I'm not
even, again, saying I think the voting even
translates. I'm saying it's about a mob that
you can use. And I think that's what
this was about.
I just remember this picture too, you know?
The Trump they're fighting at the rallies, you
know? It was it got really interesting. I'll
include this for you. Now, get remember, I
wrote this a long time ago, so
Oh, shoot.
Hold on a second. I just realized
I forgot to save my tabs. I'm so
glad I saw that.
How many did I close so far?
Sorry about this, guys. Give me one second.
Shoot.
Let me just reopen these tabs real quick,
and I'm gonna save them all.
Brief,
live moment here. Hold on. I guess we're
always live. Right?
Let's see. I think that's good enough.
Was that that was the Here, I'll keep
going.
I don't wanna I don't wanna miss it.
Oh, never go. That's right. Oh, that's right.
The geoengineering.
Sorry about this, guys. It's important to me,
as you guys well know. It's very important
to me that you always get all the
tabs,
all the links.
Because, I mean, I don't think anybody nope.
I mean, does anybody else do that other
than Corbett and some of the other independent
media in this in likely the circles that
we run-in? I mean, it's it's sourcing your
materials. Very few. Right? I mean, well, I
guess I what I should just do is
have a big table with a bunch of
piece of paper a bunch of papers that
show tweets and act like that's all the
source material. That'll get you.
That's a smart way to do it. Here,
let me get the, saved bookmarks here. I'm
sure you all know what I was referencing
right there.
Okay. So this is what I do every
time and I've got so many tabs. I
don't know if you guys can see this
or not, but I've got so many things
saved.
So many things.
Alright. 1 1325.
Alright. Let's get back to the show. Very
important to me that we do that.
So back to the point, January 6th,
divide of the unformed.
I think it's very clear
that
whether it's the larger picture or all I
mean, it's about trying to tap into that
and keep us at each other's throats so
that we don't all and I say this
every time, so we do not end up
recognizing what's actually happening.
Now talking about this in the
internal element of the current administration about to
take power, there's a lot of examples that
right now stand out. And, again, this is
not an all encompassing coverage. Right? This is
evolving. If you we've been doing this every
show since the moment this really since post
the election. Right?
In the beginning, it was pretty wild. One
after another, it was like this Zionist, that
Zionist, and they're all still there. Hegseth and
his lawyer will talk about and the overlap
with Andrew Tate. It gets
cartoonishly
stupid at this point.
And I just don't know how anybody's taking
this seriously anymore.
The point is that there are so many
examples that this is anything but America first.
At the very least, that they're not following
through with their promises. Just wait till we
get more into foreign policy. But so Angela
mc McCarty
says, please be patient with Tulsi Gabbard.
Right. Like, she's some kind of kindergartner. And
other Liberty allies as the senate twists the
knife into their sides over the confirmation hearings.
Okay.
Like, so okay. We all see how these
go.
We understand they're asking. Usually, the partisan side,
you know, you try to ask questions that
make them look bad, like, it's somebody they
want.
But the worst they can do is lob
lob
incendiary questions at you. So what what are
you gonna be patient with them with in
what regard? When they say things that we
don't like to hear?
I mean, that's the only way that makes
sense to me. So why would that make
sense? The idea being that you're insinuating she's
gonna say things to get them off her
back that may not be true in the
long run. Guys, this is so crazy.
And that's how I'm reading it, but trust
me, this sentiment is all over the place.
That right now, you know, don't like, or
like we just said, well, no. You don't
know until it comes to pass. He may
just be saying that to get a better
deal. Oh, so you're okay with him lying
as long as he gets what he wants
out of it? Really great way to start
this presidency. Right? And this is how it
goes. You give them the benefit of the
doubt. That's not how this should work.
So here's what Whitney said about it.
How about instead of putting all our hope
in people and hoping they return
to prior pro freedom stances, if they ever
actually held them, I would add, they have
recently abandoned out of political inconvenience
people focus on building resilient local communities that
are more likely to withstand
as much of the incoming
as possible because the government isn't coming to
save you. Can't believe I'm tweeting this at
the head of the Libertarian party.
I it's I don't even understand this. If
you I don't know why people are completely,
like, disillusioned about a lot of these things
today. It is comic right now. Like, basically,
we're not at the point where it's like,
well, here's my logic and why I disagree.
It's it's just like, me might as well
come out and be like, here's why I
argue the great reset should be our future.
Hashtag Elon Musk free speech or whatever. Oh,
yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's like, how is it
any different?
I I again, I'm maybe we're seeing that.
Maybe most people are seeing this. And just
like with COVID 19, they're bolstering this false
image of the majority that only represents 1%
of the population. Wouldn't surprise me right now.
Now here is Mark Zuckerberg
meeting with Donald Trump at Mar a Lago,
which is exactly what you know, we already
talked about this.
People that are supposed to be you know,
people that the the,
core Republican side of this were saying should
be in prison Are now lining up with
Trump, and it's all good because now our
team's stronger.
Oh, so you don't have any integrity is
what you're saying? That so if net if
if
I mean, by that logic, anybody that was
once the worst villain, if as long as
they wanna team up with you, then it's
all good. Right? Because now we are more
powerful. What that only that shows you is
the people that are cheering this are not
worried about the problems they present as long
as those problems they can use.
So we can aim that at the democrats,
so we're good. These are not honest people,
guys. They don't have integrity or principles. It's
about power.
And the problem is it's everywhere right now.
And a David Icke says, weren't they going
to arrest this guy like they were Hillary
Clinton?
You have to you really have to laugh.
It's a big club and that MAGA's believe
only involves Democrats when the big club also
involves those they worship. Wake up for goodness
sake. Your fake alternative media is playing you
on behalf of their masters, Trump and Musk.
Right, Alex?
Now here is
Trump's lawyer
or the, main head counselor, whatever official position
is.
I mean, you know my opinion around Andrew,
Andrew Taine. I don't even know how you
could argue with an opinion, guys. You could
listen to him say it himself. And I'm
I'm glad to see this start to boil
up to the surface.
I actually think that's why he's running for
UK prime minister, which I honestly think is
really embarrassing. And I swear, I'm gonna tell
you right now, if he somehow manages to
get in that position,
that will change my entire world view.
Like, not because I think at the end
of the day that this is something that
that I believe the vote translates. Even in
the UK. I just that's I I would
really need more to be able to ever
think that again. Not that it shouldn't be
or it's not possible, but just where we
are in the world. But how they would
think that the people
would be okay with that. And and if
they are okay with that, even worse that
I'm definitely don't understand the people of the
world.
I just had not I've I've
we'll see. Because this is wild to me.
Andrew Tate is objectively one of the worst
people on the Internet,
openly bragging about some of the worst actions
against women, sexual trafficking, sexual abuse.
Now I I'll play some a couple of
these things. But Shannon Joy, for example, just
had Milk Bar TV on to talk about
this. He's been breaking this down very well,
documenting this. I think Murder by Kranz, I
think, is one of the groups as well.
And I'll show you some of these.
I I'm not gonna go through the videos
and waste my time on it, guys. It
is if you can't do your due diligence
enough to see him saying,
laughing about, and then showing the documents on
the screen of what he claims are never
happened or the fact that he's pretending the
case was dismissed even though you could prove
that it was not and it is still
active, I just it's it's you don't care.
I'm not gonna waste the time to try
to jam in your face something that people
don't wanna see. This is obvious. Now the
story is not the disgusting Andrew Tate. The
story is how Trump's chief counsel
is going, I'm a big fan of this
guy, as he then runs for UK prime
minister, and Elon and Trump both lean into
him. That's terrifying to me because of how
horrifying this person is. Now that doesn't mean
that they align with everything he thinks and
does, but it means they don't care whether
people are bad, which, by the way, that
shouldn't be a secret.
When they work with ISIS and Al Qaeda
and Israel and Saudi Arabia, it's pretty clear
that they don't really care about what you
do when you're not benefiting them.
Andrew Tate, Trump counselor Alina Habah is big
fan of Andrew Tate, believes Tate and Trump
are fighting the same battle.
Well, that's horrifying. Now, one of the things
you're gonna see is that a lot of
conservatives are like, what the f are you
doing?
Like, again, the people that are not dumb,
not blind, have integrity,
that just actually believe
that's their own issue, that what Trump and
the rest of them tell them they're gonna
do. Maybe I'm wrong. Right?
But this happens and they go, are you
kidding me?
Like, the story I'm seeing go around is
there's an article that show
that and that guy has a tape problem.
Like, it's I'm glad they have the courage
to call it out.
Here's the actual one of the one of
the quick clips here. Oh, first, actually,
just in case you forgot, because we did
this on the last show as we were
talking about the administration,
the taps
for the inauguration, the people for his administration.
Here is his lawyer
saying
atrocity propaganda,
or for Israel,
like everybody else in his circle.
And this is I mean, this is some
of the most obviously fake information.
So let me tell you what I know
of President Trump because I think it's important.
He is being
fought hard by the deep state.
They are coming at him in a way
I have never seen,
and meanwhile,
we have real problems with children's heads getting
cut off in Israel.
But our country is not far from that.
And if we don't start fighting that deep
state
and the corruption that I've seen, we are
in trouble. I mean, I'm just embarrassed for
her. How much you wanna bet? I bet
you my life. If you went to her
right now and said, explain what the deep
state is for me,
She'd probably struggle to tell you what it
was.
Doesn't matter, though. It's an abstract idea. We
just want you to it's like fighting a
war on terror for the way they're using
it.
The reality is the people that she's working
for are the deep state. The globalist entities
that are literally rolling out the globalist plan
under the guise of fighting the globalist plan.
Netanyahu
and the rest of the people. I believe
Trump and Elon are absolutely part of that.
But I will always leave the caveat because
I can't prove that I know they know
they're doing it.
So maybe he's being tricked. But how do
we ignore stuff like that? My point is
I think most conservatives in this movement are
very aware that that's a bold BS story.
And yet here she is saying it, and
they all keep repeating this stuff. That's a
provably false story according to literally
everybody other than those still lying about it.
That's not a that's not a that is
not a hyperbolic statement. Israeli media,
everybody.
Even Biden walked it back. I mean, my
god. This is this is crazy.
And so we're tell they're telling you
that he's fighting the deep state.
Like, we have this problem over here. But
if you said, what is it?
You know, the honest answer would be an
the unelected power structure. But they don't wanna
say that loud because guess what? That's pretty
much everybody right now being tapped by Donald
Trump. The unelected bureaucrats, like Elon Musk himself,
like Bebek,
like Teal.
But here, to make this even worse, is
what she said in the Bennie Johnson show.
And this is
after and you can we'll show you right
here. This
is Andrew Tate, literally, with his own weird
little kind of fake background for the UK
thing.
I mean, straight up embarrassing himself. You want
my honest opinion? And we'll get into him
embarrassing himself afterward in another clip. But here
is what Bennie Johnson had to say with
him and bringing on the lawyer and where
she just simply says, I'm big fan
of this sexual predator.
Andrew, we have a special guest that is
joining us right now. Somebody who,
noticed that you would be on our show.
Again, now before we even get into it,
guys, are you really of the mind that
Benny Johnson can't look for himself, or does
he just not care? That every single thing
Andrew says is a lie he's on video
saying he's done or that he has videotapes
of doing or that he has affidavit. You
know, the the girls themselves that he claims
are lying. Everything you think is not is
the opposite. And, again, literally, I have the
evidence I've gone through extensively on this show.
Here's Nathan Livingstone. Milkbar TV is the name
of his account. He has gone through this
and and as well as murder by krans.
And and, guys, look at their accounts, and
I'll I'll include some of them for you.
Down here, I think I got some of
the clips. Or, actually, maybe I didn't bring
it. Let me grab one real quick. All
you gotta do is really go to their
accounts. They've been and, again, this is not
like some you know, they wrote this out
on their blog. This this is videotape documented
evidence of exactly what they've been doing.
Like, here, I mean, go you go through
this. Here he is telling you, me, I'll
do 2 to 3 virgins a year. That's
his brother speaking on the record with old
interviews. They are so full of hubris that
they think they can just state these things
then Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens and Betty
Johnson will roll off the red carpet and
they'll come out and say, they're misrepresenting
my words and they're calling me rep they're
lying to you. And they either know that
or have proven to you that they should
not even
that they're pretending to be a journalist.
Let me give you an edge of your
tape. I mean, that you I don't I
don't wanna waste time on all this. Again,
the point is it is shockingly obvious. And
my point on top of that is we've
gone through this. Probably, like, a 40 minute
time last time with Viltbar TV's evidence and
others proving this. And realize the courts that
are charging them are it's all in the
affidavits, and you can prove this based on
what,
they have presented, which you can
pull up the link for yourself and read.
My point is how you think Bennie Johnson,
Tucker Carlson, Candacellen, and the rest.
You think they're not doing that? Do you
think they don't care? Do you think they've
seen it and it doesn't bother them?
I don't know which one of those makes
you feel worse, but you can decide for
yourself.
Oh, well, by the way, you didn't see
that. I was just I was what I
did is I was opening up his his
account here. Anyway, I'll I'll come back to
it. I'll grab him while it's playing, and
I'll show you.
And wanted to say hello.
This is the attorney
for president Trump.
Somebody who has been a fighter for the
America First party.
Her name is Alina Haba,
and she joins us live right now.
Hi. Hello, Alina.
Hi.
Nice to meet you. I'm a big fan.
Well, nice to meet you. I'm a fan.
You're the one saving Trump. You're doing more
important work than me. America.
Americ God. I swear. He just looks like
a child.
I'm just just my just the way he
presents himself. It's so he he to me,
it's such a classic point as usual. The
person who has to constantly tell you he's
tough is usually the weakest person in the
room. Now, I don't mean necessarily
strong.
You know, he doesn't work out. I mean
that he's weak.
That he that he's so insecure.
That's the way he's acting right there. It's
like a child. I mean, I just it's
my personal opinion. You can decide for yourself.
But everything about this person is so strange
to me. How in the world anybody with
integrity,
anybody with discernment is ever gonna be able
to how do you not see right through
this
person? Erica, not just Trump. And I agree
with everything you just said.
And I think that your
anger,
is the same that president Trump has for
our country, and
the time is now for us to stop
being wimps. I think that's exactly the right
sentiment. And I also have to say that
I sympathize with you because I think you
go through a lot of the same
show me the person, I'll find the crime
that president Trump has gone through. And,
it's ironic that
Benny has you on today because, as you
know, president Trump just got sentenced in what
literally will be one of the most tragic
stories in American history and democracy
and the justice system that I used to
be proud of being part of.
But I agree with everything you say, and
I I I have your back out here
in the states. And when I saw that
you were gonna be on, I said to
Benny, I have to meet Andrew Tate. I
agree with everything you say.
I mean, this is a lawyer.
Like, okay. We are either in a in
a in a world right now where these
people are the children in the room who
have been given too much power,
titles and whatever else, but literally are just
actually not smart enough to be able to
see what we're talking about, or they're all
lying to you. I mean, I'm sure there's
another possibility, but how do you explain to
me that these million follower
wealthy influential
journalists are uncapable
of recognizing what this person is and seeing
his the the evidence that is literally everywhere
if you just look for it? I'll show
you next. Or this lawyer is unable to
of recognizing how bad that would be. I
mean, it's just
it's perplexing.
There is literally only one person with the
same amount of anger and fire, and that's
probably me and president Trump.
But it's because you love,
what's right. And you're being under siege, and
I I see it. And, just keep fighting.
I mean, I'm I'm here for it. You
know, there is no time anymore for weakness.
We are being destroyed,
and we need strong powerful voices like yours.
And,
yeah, I got your back over here. Well,
I I tell you, when I if I
ever get stateside, and and I think I
will sooner or later, if I ever need
a lawyer, I'm gonna I'm gonna I'll be
calling your phone. But, you know, it's very
important. It's very important, and this is something
we need to understand because when you're animated
or when you're angry, people call you hateful.
And that's one of the semantic tricks I
was discussing earlier that the left love to
use. You're not hateful if you love something.
They'll call you hateful
of whatever.
They'll call you See,
the only thing he has is to use
you, to tap into your partisan talking points,
to get you worked out, and it's lazy,
clumsy,
transparent.
But my point is the Johnsons of the
world
rise him up, and too many people that
believe in Benny fall for it or Candace
or Tucker or whoever else. And I'm not
saying they know. Maybe they don't know. But
it's kinda hard to think how it's they're
it's it's even possible that they would not
be able to see through this
provable liar.
Now, if you want if you are if
you care
about the real picture of this person or
the facts around the story or the fact
that he's literally running to be prime minister
of the UK or that Trump's chief counsel
is endorsing him or saying we agree with
everything you have to say and you want
to prove it to yourself, then look.
You will not be I mean, this is
just one of them. You looked out his
account, but I'll include this as well. Nathan
shows a video here saying a video clearly
proving Andrew Tate is guilty of human trafficking.
And I'm not saying take that at face
value. Look at it. This video we played
for you on the show before. I'm not
gonna waste more time on Andrew Tate today.
Here's a longer video. The point is it's
undeniable. He's literally stating this like his brother
was saying before. I wanna take 2, 3
versions a day. We do the the best
thing to do with it doesn't it's gross.
I hate even saying these things out loud.
It's
everywhere
you
look.
Where was it? This person simply says, Tate
Sims like Bennet Johnson will still excuse this.
They will say we just disagree.
Yeah. I mean, you know, it's everything about
the idea of being the masculine, you know,
domino like, you know, anyway, it's not even
worth wasting the time on it. But the
sad reality is that too many people fall
for this.
And I'm I'm not saying like, my my
point is there are people that lean into
this guy because they like that.
My point though is there's far more people
who fall for the fake Andrew Tate that
gets presented through the corporate mainstream alternative media
that claims he's not that person. That he's
an honest guy trying to help young men.
He's not. I mean, he literally just shouted
somebody down for saying, we don't wanna we
don't want Greenland. We wanna focus on America.
And he goes, you're not selfish enough. You
don't want more take my you know, whatever
he said.
Really? Teaching young men how to be more
selfish and take what they want and hurt
women. Hooray.
Nathan says, Andrew Tate.
Oh, well, this was the the
he's quoting I was gonna just play the
video, make sure it's not just all one
quote. Yeah. So Tate was interviewed after the
assassination attempt on Trump last year and said,
I spoke with Barron after this incident.
We look forward to
being with Donald Trump in person. And he
goes, see, the seeming alliance between Andrew Tate
and the MAGA movement has sparked controversy
since senior Trump adviser
is, Alina oh, yes. So is is it
chief counsel? I thought she was still anyway,
senior Trump adviser as Nathan is saying anyway,
fond over Tate saying he's a big fan.
Backlash in the MAGA movement has begun with
many being outspoken in their opposition to Tate.
Those charges include rape, human trafficking, trafficking of
a minor, and continuous sex with a minor
for which Tate is currently under house arrest
for.
One MAGA account, Misfit Patriot,
made a viral video
with the title MAGA has an Andrew Tate
problem, and it's a big effing problem, saying
Andrew Tate is the biggest effing mistake we
can make. Now realize it's the same guy,
I think, who was very stupidly trying to
shout down what Ian Carroll was saying, which
is
shocking the most obvious thing you could prove
in the conversation today. That's not to say
that he wasn't doing it for some surreptitious
reason. Nonetheless, that topic is important to highlight
that what he said was true. So it's
still worthy of pointing to, but also be
skeptical about why it might be happening. Or
like with USS Liberty and Candace Owens, why
suddenly him pointing at something that other even
larger accounts have done entire things around and
yet got no attention for? That doesn't mean
it's fake or false or it's high up,
and you could ask those questions.
Still acknowledge that the information was correct. I
think, David Ivey made a point about how
Cynthia McKenney has been breaking this information down
for decades and on very major platforms, but
it just doesn't get attention. You know? That
stuff is not by accident. Something allowed that
to happen in my opinion. But he came
out and was like, fake news. Fake news.
I'm just really stupid. But the point
is that he goes, Tate on the record
admitting to being with a 15 year old
when he was in his mid twenties. Videos
have been circulated of Tate slapping her and
beating her with a belt, and I've seen
this. All easy to find.
Milk Bar TV has broken this down. His
entire account is riddled with this information.
And videos have been circulating for beating, slapping
her with a belt on her underwear. These
have been verified. They have been filmed in
2012 with a woman that was 15. And
again, there's videos where he's saying this and
citing this information where you can and the
date's there. You can prove that she was
underage. And this is what's being used in
court right now. Teta's been charged in Romania
with trafficking as minor. The point there is,
remember there was an issue where they had
some kind of an what's the word for
it? Something wasn't there was a mistake made
in the in the filing, so they had
to pull it back. Now I've looked for
myself. It is still they're just correcting it
and it's gonna be refiled. He used that
to pretend like the case was dismissed. That's
how desperate he must be. Now look, if
he ends up getting completely dismissed from the
case, that still wouldn't surprise me. Because this
guy is, right now as we'll go into
next,
clearly tapping into some of the most powerful
people in the world, which is pretty terrifying.
Because he's an objectively disgusting person, which, by
the way, is the circle he should be.
That's what the rest of that circle seems
to be. He goes, Tait is facing 3
criminal trials for human trafficking, rape, 2 in
Romania, 1 with an additional civil trial in
the UK for rape, all separate cases and
victims, which is likely to go to trial
this year.
And here's a video that we were talking
about earlier. There's one down there. Here's another
one down here. Says Andrew Tate is alleged
to have rented an apartment for the 15
year old girl. I mean, guys, it's just
so much information. These are all affidavits. He
sources everything he's talking about.
Now here is the point about Elon
Musk. And he says Tate owned a little
tattoo on his side he's making fun of.
He goes, remember in 2 in 2023,
when Elon Musk handpicked Andrew Tate to be
one of a handful of influencers to receive
ad revenue after a month after he was
charged with sex trafficking and rape. How much
you wanna bet you know, if Laura Loomer
is getting 200,000 followers, which is they're at
least $200,000
a month. That's $1, unless you can do
50¢. I'm not sure. Think of how much
money he's pulling in. I I wanted to
bet you that through Twitter, they're basically funneling
their
the ad the revenue they're using. I mean,
who knows? But it says,
Musk should be applauded for highlighting UK grooming
gangs. However, his support of Tate, which again,
it's not a false story.
Now I'll make a point about it in
a second though. In no way do I
think he's pointing at that because he thinks
he's trying to solve that problem. He's trying
to deviate attention in ways that he knows
it won't be solved because he's basically doing
what I, again, call the Alice Jones effect.
The way he's doing it is meant to
make it not get solved but cause a
lot of a hub you know, a lot
of attention around the story, but then bolster
that story with fake BS.
That's how they do this today. And then
it looks like they're causing a lot of
attention, but what they're doing is causing a
lot more people to ignore it entirely,
how it works. And it's still their fault
for ignoring it, but they know how this
works. His his his his support of Tate
now faces 3 criminal charges.
He's troubling. Hypocrisy is clear.
And this is all we talked about at
the time, including Andrew Tate.
So all the way back then, you can
see Elon bolstering this person. You cannot ignore
how these things are all interconnected. And right
now, Elon Musk is absolutely leaning in to
Andrew Tate. So is Donald Trump, so is
his lawyer.
Oh, and then I'll I'll include this video.
I'll make sure I got that one too.
So this is the one we just mentioned,
and here's the one about It's a 6
minute video you can watch for yourself,
where it's in his opinion one of the
best examples of evidence that he's a human
trafficker.
All this is being used. Now
here,
I probably won't play all of it, is
Andrew Tate pretending to run for UK prime
minister. This was this it feels
I don't know. Like, we're watching a skit
or something.
Oh, wait. Actually, here's the clip for Donald
Trump first, and we'll come back to that.
And I'm very close to the Trump family.
I know them well, and I spoke to
Barron after the incident. And I look forward
to, once I am free, being with Donald
Trump in person and reminding him that he's
a bulletproof badass. This is the attorney for
president Trump.
Somebody and that was it. Yeah. Traffic. That's
the part you already saw from the other
one. I just wanna play that. So he
basically saying he's, you know, again, he maybe
that's not true. He he's known to say
a lot of false things, but he's claiming
he's super close to Trump, which doesn't seem
to be far off.
So here is this video with him running
for prime minister.
Ladies and gentlemen of the United Kingdom,
my name is Andrew Teit. I'm the leader
of the Brev party.
No joke.
Actually called the brov party. I mean, guys,
the equivalent in the United States would be
the bro party.
This is just the stupidest thing I've ever
heard in my life.
Britain restoring underlying values,
and I'm here to introduce myself to you
as the only hope and chance for the
once great Britain to repair itself from the
eternal decline we are unfortunately being subjected to.
Now realize, the reason I think he's doing
this is because he he recognized an opening.
Elon Musk is screaming about that we need
to change governance in the UK. Right? So,
he goes, well, there's an opportunity. I can
play their game too. I can get more
political power. I can get every, you know,
the actual rulers of the world to
want me in power and then no one
can touch me. Look at Netanyahu. Right? This
is how this works. He's not stupid in
that regard. He sees an opportunity to avoid
going to prison for sex trafficking. You know,
weirdly enough, what we can see connected to
a lot of elitists and a lot of
government circles. He's right at place. The bottom
line, though, is that this is being done
because there's an opening in my opinion.
So maybe they can actually move this into
something actually like, they this is like, I
would argue that it's a
it's possible.
Like, this would terrify me if this actually
came to pass, and it really would change
my opinion of a lot. But I see
it as possible right now because of how
much we see the momentum around this country,
even in the UK overlapping with all of
this. And the argument being, like, this may
be the Trump moment for the UK where
they put I mean, Boris was kinda the
same thing, but the bottom line being somebody
that seems like the the change.
It's not really. It is actually an objectively
bad direction, but they fall for the narrative.
The bruv party. This
is so dumb.
I'm extremely rich and very successful.
Although this is not Again again, I'm strong
and I'm powerful and I'm rich and I
you know, usually is a huge sign of
weakness. You don't need to say those things.
Weak man says wants Great Britain to repair
itself from the eternal decline we are unfortunately
being subjected to.
I'm extremely rich and very successful.
And although this has not brought me much
happiness or any new friends, it has certainly
increased the variety and capability of my enemies.
They have
locked me
in remain He's terrible at reading apparently and
also just stumbling. I mean, you could see
he stumbling. And we're the next one, we're
gonna show you the same thing. Yeah. For
over 3 years, the UK foreign office instructed
the Romanians to do exactly this on false
charges.
Charges that even Romanian courts now are admitting
were completely fabricated. That's false.
100% false.
Easy to prove. And we've and we've already
done it, in fact. It's it's just it's
it's spectacular how this keeps happening. But it's
no different than the rest of them. He
knows he sees what they're doing. He's trying
to act above his station clearly, but he
thinks he I'm gonna I'm gonna be a
a prime minister. And then it won't matter.
They all lied too. They nobody cares. Maybe
I can do the same thing.
It's a good shot. Because they fear my
influence.
And they fear my influence because the United
Kingdom has been hijacked
by Satanists
who have absolutely no concern for the people
they are supposed to work for. You see,
my point is, like, look. I I can
we you wanna get into the reality of
the overlap of the occultist circles in our
governments and whether it's satanism, Luciferianism, like, the
reality of that conversation.
But it's just so clumsy how he taps
into what the lowest common denominator responds to.
You know, the pedophile satanist kind of argument.
It's just it's a broad it's not the
full picture, and it's lazy to present it
that way. But there's elements of truth to
everything that manipulators use today.
They work for big banking interests, and they
ignore their constituents absolutely.
There is currently nobody within the political class
which will do the things which are necessary
to repair our once great country.
There is no reason Oh oh oh, well,
are we hearing an, make UK great again
coming on? That might maybe that's in the
in the work there. For a city with
a legacy like London to be running with
blood
and for drugs to constantly
be found on our streets. There is Like
literally everyone in the world, right? Blood running
on the streets,
you know, it's you get it. No reason
for a country like Great Britain that once
had the most formidable Navy on the planet
to be endlessly invaded,
incapable of defending its own borders.
Oh, so we're talking about the illegal immigration
conversation now? Are we talking about, like I
mean, you know what? I I don't almost
think I wanna waste more time on it.
It's just It's so,
I mean, you tell me what you think.
Doesn't this come across as like like I'm
embarrassed for this guy? That he thinks that
he's actually this info I mean, I know
there are people that love this guy and
lean into him.
Maybe I just have a higher opinion of
the average intelligence of the world.
And it's not even about being super I
mean, guys, this is low.
This is like your this is the kind
of person that, at least where I grew
up, you made fun of. The weak, tough
guy who thinks he's bigger than everybody, but,
secretly, we all know he's actually pretty stupid
or actually doesn't you know, it's insecurity
just overflowing
despite him being rich and being a kickboxer.
I mean, he has every reason not to
be, but it's I mean, you tell me
I'm wrong. It is you can sense it
in everything he does, and that's my opinion.
But either way,
ultimately, it comes down to the fact that
people are choosing to use this person despite
having
I mean, I get the sense maybe it's
meant to blow up at some point.
But you guys can decide for yourselves.
The thing is, he's running for prime minister,
and I do think that's pretty terrifying.
So here, after, when he clearly got a
lot of pushback from people I mean, it's
kind of a running joke depending on where
you look on Twitter right now. And so
and this person's saying he could barely read,
which I've seen many of these, by the
way, in similar ways. But it goes during
a stream after he announced that he was
running for prime minister, Andrew pretended he was
shooting from the hip with his speech.
However, it was clear he was reading, and
he's struggling, and his bro his his brother
had to help him a couple times.
For everybody who is mocking this attempt for
me to become the prime minister, please understand,
I'm a wealthy person with 50 years of
life left. The chance of me being prime
minister, considering I was the most Googled man
alive,
sometime before I die is actually very high.
And I will leave a legacy
of flawless
Governance.
Flawless governance. Beautiful.
I will leave a legacy of flawless
governance.
I can't even say it. The crime has
gotten worse. The NHS has gotten worse. The
economy has gotten worse. There's nothing you can
name. Public image has gotten worse. The military
has gotten worse. Now here's a quick side
note, by the way, and this is a
this is the way of politics today.
Almost by design, drive us into such chaos
that your answer is not solutions. It's just
that's bad and that's bad and that's bad.
That's a very Trump thing to do.
He he's he's almost like he's like a
a cartoon version or like a
like a a knockoff version of a Trump.
You're right. That's what he's pretending to be.
He's like a very poorly made version of
China Trump
doll in China. You know? The bottom line
is that he is clearly trying to present
this as I know what I'm talking about.
How much you wanna bet if you actually
ask him? Okay. What's your solution for the
economy? Go.
I mean, I almost really wanna see that
happen, because it'll be really
enjoyable to watch him completely reveal himself to
be as stupid as he is. That he
does not know what he's talking about when
it comes to any of the things he's
professing to know how to solve. And it's
the same thing with a lot of these
politicians.
Education. Education system's gotten worse. The gotten worse.
The military's gotten worse. Education. Education system's gotten
worse. The judiciary's
gotten worse. God. There's not a single
institution inside of the UK that is not
worse than it was 10 years ago.
Donald Trump is the man for the United
States. He's the only man who publicly took
endless heat, lawfare, and assassination
attempts
as America goes through a political resurgence,
as they go through a brand new version
of government read led by competent
nationalists.
God. I mean, not only can he not
read his own writing, or maybe somebody wrote
it for him, he can't he can't even
read the words.
But let's let's let's let him be a
president. Mine might might be this point,
I'm just gonna make a joke, but it's
not even worth making that joke right now.
It's it's too real. You know? This this
is not something that should be dismissed. And
I hate the fact that we don't have
to say that.
Now, murder by Kranz in a spaces,
basically,
Tate was on there, came in, and presented
presented his the way he sees the the
evidence.
Now, you can watch it for yourself. It's
about,
4 minutes long. But what's humorous about it
is he comes in and immediately once he
comes in, Andrew goes, oh, the pedo.
Because that's how easy oh, you're a pedophile.
So everybody disregard what he says about me
because that's what was about to happen. He
knows that. And so in murder by crayons,
this is lasset off and goes, well, you
did this and you did that. And that's
what this affidavit show that's what the court
filing show. And Andrew just goes,
woah. You're so stupid. That that's what he
does. It's really embarrassing.
And then basically
leaves right as the guy is like, okay,
okay, fine. Let let's let's go back and
forth. Andrew, present your evidence. Oh, you're gone.
Okay. Sorry. Right. So all he does is
act like it's so dumb. He would how
he's laughing about how he would even get
what you can easily prove this stuff.
The desperation is wild.
I know and I think there's Yeah. Here's
more evidence that here's There's proven he's lying
about not being charged. Now, this is a
thread that you can look through with the
affidavit information. Now, not Most this is not
new information. They're just reposting this based on
these conversations. It has been documented over and
over and over. Here is Milpar TV
making a point. We're gonna segue into the
next discussion here where he goes, Andrew Tate
used the same methods as the UK grooming
gangs to groom teenage girls. Uh-oh. That's an
uncomfortable overlap, isn't it? So suddenly, we have
obvious examples where we have people trying to
distract you over somewhere else, which I argue
don't really care about what they're trying to
show you,
but only selectively pointed out. Right? We don't
care about the the
culture of gang rape going on in these
Israeli prisons and the Israeli IDF that they
openly support, or the fact that you're somebody
you are currently supporting
is doing the same thing.
That seems like a pretty disgusting contradiction. Right?
What we continue to have is
the
expanding so this conversation is important and that
we've talked about for a very long time.
It's not just the United States, which does
seem to be one of the most prevalent
problems,
The locations rather. But the idea of, like,
human trafficking, sex trafficking, child trafficking. These are
not things to be dismissed, but it's such
an uncomfortable conversation for most people because it
feels like I think it's been so it's
been tainted with that conspiracy theory for a
lot of normal people.
Despite how many examples like Epstein. Right?
Or
trafficking ring is being knocked down. I mean,
it's it's it's objectively a real thing. And
in fact, the largest network seems to run
through the United States, which should not be
hard for you to wrap your mind around
that the government's involved with that. But the
whole big the bigger point though is that,
do they really wanna solve these things? Elon
Musk pointing over to the UK, many of
the people in here are going, what what
are you why aren't you pointing at what's
going on here?
As we were being told, how are you
looking at Israel when this is happening? Well,
right when that happens, you don't see them
going, why are you talking about the UK?
Because you're just following, you know, daddy's lead.
Right? That's how it works when the team
sports side. But what's interesting though is we
keep saying is it's not a false story.
I hope you've heard me say that every
single time. The reality is that we've already
talked about this conversation a long time ago.
But I wanna bring it back to this
point, one, to show you how they don't
seem to call it out in in earnest,
neither in the UK or anywhere else for
that matter as they're working with people that
do the same thing. But here's an example
of the overlap.
Low key highlights this, a person named Yvor
Kaplan, the former chair of the Israeli lobby
for the, what's the JLM was the,
let me look it up real quick.
Where is it?
Thinking that's I'm gonna get the right,
Jewish labor movement.
So he's a lobby he's a lobby lobby,
Israel lobby group, the chair of the Jewish
lobby,
labor movement, which is closely linked to the
Israeli embassy.
And he has been caught by pedophile hunters
attempting to meet a child.
And to the point to where he literally
gets arrested. Right? So this is not some
dismissible story. So this guy literally shows up
secretly thinking he's gonna meet a young child
and gets caught by these guys.
So hold right there. I hope this trickles
out to these people so they are so
terrified that they hide in the shadows throughout
their life, if not go to prison. You
know, the idea being that they just don't
ever hurt children again is the point. Because
this is becoming more prevalent. I love it.
I love the fact that these that has
to weigh on their minds. These absolute disgusting
human beings out there, which they'll still forget
how prevalent this isn't allowed to be in
Israel. That's not some knock against Jewish people.
That's that's a knock against the society that's
been allowed to cultivate in Israel because of
Zionism.
But realize that it overlaps
in a lot of horrifying places in the
world and realize that that is something that
is not identified or, I mean, discussed rather.
It's wild how prevalent it is. Nonetheless, the
point is this person gets caught.
Here he is on corporate media talking about
support for their government. Now the point that
relates to the UK discussion is this is
a guy from the United the United Kingdom
in one of these very points from the
Labour Party. And so while as he's highlighting
all of this, there's an obvious point showing
you there's a clear problem. But if you're
only gonna highlight this insofar that you distract
us from what's going on here and don't
actually see anything happen or actually present any
evidence.
Right? You see, what they're highlighting is the
stories,
which are important.
Look at this guy who got arrested for
this and got this much time, and look
at this guy who raped this girl and
got way more or way less time. That's
a fair point to make.
Okay. So what's the proof that they did
this in a coordinated effort to make what's
the what the government did this for some
x, y, and z agenda. It's the same
point I'm making with the fires and everything
else. Of course, we should never dismiss that,
and I'll be the first to report it
when we can prove it. And even report,
as we usually do, the evidence that suggests
that that still might be the case. But
we should stop when we come to the
point where we can't prove it. That's where
the mainstream alternative media lurches in and goes,
great reset. We can whatever they wanna say.
Usually based on things I think are somewhat
true, but not that we can prove it.
In this case,
when he keeps hyping about all the labor
party members and, you know, weirdly
certain sides of the government, even though we
can prove it's pretty much the UK government.
Ask people in the UK, they're gonna cover
this their entire lives. Again, he highlights one
part. It's a team sport politics thing. The
point though is that when you're just pointing
at the outcomes
and then going, these are the guys that
allowed them. Well, they're they're not gonna get
arrested for that. If we want this to
change, then we should maybe actually prove that
someone's doing something and follow through with it.
You get what I'm saying? And the problem
is even just highlighting that, which should be
an objective fact, gets people framing it as
I'm dismissing what he's saying. It's just it's
lazy partisan garbage.
And here, again, is one of the very
people actually getting caught by somebody doing actual
work to get these people arrested.
Now as far as I can tell, I'm
not seeing this get framed really I'm I'm
surprised I I thought you would. This works
for the narrative. But interesting enough though, this
is a real story and high highlights somebody
connected to Israel, which is part of the
story that you're not gonna get.
Selectively boxing this stuff out.
But here is saying, now we know why
labor voted against an inquiry. They are guilty.
You see, making it about one side of
the party or of the government.
That's just so shockingly disingenuous.
You ask anybody who's been following this and
is not unique to one side or the
other unless you're a partisan manipulator.
And this person says, so former senior labor
MP was caught grooming kids. That's the one
we're talking about. The same week they voted
against inquiry. Now that's not an far obviously,
that's a fair point to make. Did he
do that in order to avoid that that's
a very possible thing, which seems likely.
But the boy and he goes, now we
know why.
Do you though?
I know it's a small jump, but realize
the guy they keep jumping over things that
we can prove, making bombastic statements that then
get the whole thing dismissed by people who
might actually want to do something about it.
And yes, maybe they're mainstream. Maybe they dismiss
things when they shouldn't. But maybe if they
actually got presented a real story that they
wouldn't dismiss it.
This guy is living out the Alex Jones
effect on overdrive.
It's infuriating.
I straight up think he's doing this in
order to not have things happen.
Bottom line, though, David Icke says, why don't
you stop using rape victims and child abuse
and and the the rape victims and the
child abused for your own political agenda, and
in doing so, obscure the true scale of
the and satanic networks that cross all parties
into Hollywood, Silicon Valley, Israel, and the corporate
world.
Isn't p Diddy
a Twitter shareholder?
Funny how the current conservatives never point that
out, guys. He goes on to say, isn't
the mass murder of tens of thousands of
children in Gaza by your mate, Netanyahu, and
abuse of children in in extremes?
You are a self obsessed fraud doing your
master's work. Anyone falling for it deserves you.
Now I don't leaving out the last sentence,
how do you not see those things?
The idea that as David Icke being one
of them has been calling this out in
this country to whether or not you agree
with this full picture. The idea that this
is a not one-sided story and neither is
in this country. People like Dennis Hassard and
plenty of other examples at the highest levels
of power have been caught for these things.
The overlap of Epstein is not partisan.
But yet they are really trying to shove
this in, and it's working for some people.
That's the point. P Diddy or these other
overlapping points, why isn't that the huge story?
As he's shoving you over to look somewhere
else, but in a way that will prove
guarantee that it doesn't actually solve the problem.
Because this is a a larger agenda. Now
coming back to the bigger point about globalism
and all of this, right? The point in
what we're highlighting there is that they're trying
to distract you as they roll that machine
out.
And to some degree, it's working, but I
think a lot of conservatives are starting to
push back.
But when you when you see this from
the bigger foreign policy picture and the idea
of how obviously you can see Zionist, like,
you know, Zionist Mossad agents like God Saeed
or Saeed, however you say his last name,
constantly stoking this fire while ignoring all the
facts around Israel. It's very clear what's happening.
And this is what people like Elon Musk
are are falling for or either however you
wanna read it, are taking cues from.
Now first of all, god just god, gay
g a d, however you say his name,
shares a screenshot
It's clearly you could've typed that on your
computer. Because clear because that makes sense today.
This is this is Twitter files for you
today. And all it says is the 20
24 numbers are in.
Black blacks killed 4158
whites. Whites killed 84 blacks. The United States
is said 13.7%
black and 58.4 percent white. Blacks are 23
times more likely to kill a white person
than whites are to kill a black person.
That's what he wrote. Now, maybe that's true.
Okay.
My point is not even whether we should
look it up and find out. We should
if you want to go further on the
point, but I guarantee you this is a
political manipulation.
You know how many ways you could break
this down? How many ways the categories about
who is black and who is white? Or
who shot what and what the context was?
Or whether it was a police officer who
was white and a black or a black
police officer and a white guy. I mean,
guys, it's
meant to be racially manipulative,
and this is what Zionism is. This is
what they're doing. They're trying to stoke this
racial divide for the larger agenda.
And the point is that for all we
know, this is not even true.
I mean, it's just this lazy effort to
point this out, but let's just take it
at face value and pretend that it is
true.
So you're arguing that blacks killed whites
more than whites killed blacks, Yet there is
more white people than there is blacks. What's
your argument?
That black people are trying to hunt down
white people. Right? Is that what you're really
trying to argue?
Now think about how crazy that is with
the conversation we're having today.
Despite how the evidence you could actually look
up is quite different. But the point being
that what he's trying to do is make
it out to be the others.
The the people that aren't that are a
little darker skinned are always coming for you.
How else do you take this?
And Patrick Henningkson says, you're a professional race
hustler.
You the he says, you are the Semitic
version of Al Sharpton. Same game.
Elon Musk
quotes Rupert Loem MP
and says anti white racism should not be
tolerated in civil service.
Well, how about none should be tolerated in
civil service?
Right?
The game is about trying to make it
one versus the other. And if you can't
see how often that happens look. I agree.
People that right now, there's obviously allowable levels
of racism. You're a let people in the
world are seemingly allowed on Twitter to say
whatever they want about Palestinians, or pretty much
anybody in the Middle East. But you can't
say what you want about Israel because that's
just how it works today. Or in this
case, clearly, as we can see, you're allowed
to insult or go after white people, but
you can't in other context. That's the same
conversation.
Regardless of the context or history or whatever
else, objectively, that's the same thing.
But why only point out one? Because you're
trying to paint the picture that that's more
of the idea. I I mean, you really
think that's more the case, then you are
you are straight up blind to the world.
You are following through a political lens.
Yes. That's clear. And, yes, that's being stoked
by certain political entities.
But it is racism exists. It's everywhere. And
most of it comes through people like you
guys.
But it says I've contacted every government department,
ministry to question how many jobs have been
filled through the exclusion of white people. They
use positive action to essentially discriminate against white
people. Now the point though, is that you
go back the other way, and they're erring
on the side way in the same way.
If we how about we just get back
to an actual meritocracy, which is what people
like this pretend they want, but then never
actually do that.
They use positive action to essentially discriminate against
white people. Call it what it is. Racism.
That's true. If you're simply ignoring or making
it easier, if it's not an equal setting,
then it is.
But why if you're gonna call it out
there, then we should call it out everywhere,
which is the same point. These people are
just as hypocritical about this in other context.
These same people probably wouldn't give an s
h I t about people being killed in
Gaza, in Lebanon, in Syria.
He simply says, racism of any kind is
unacceptable.
Yes. Yell it as loud as you can
so we actually kinda maybe believe you, despite
how obviously you don't believe that.
I said, okay. Now do Israel and Zionism.
I it it's such a transparently dishonest thing
to do. And the people we were pointing
at earlier, who know that, they don't buy
this. They know he's do he's lying.
That's why this thing is falling apart.
They are banking on the dishonest people. I'm
of the mind that there are less of
the dishonest people than there are honest.
That's my belief.
Here is a famous
academic, Israeli Jewish academic from Britain. We're from
from
both Israeli and British, and he is speaking
on the reality of
the racism in Israel. Now you've seen this
before.
Avi shlom Avi shlaim, actually, and we've talked
about this more than once, that he's telling
you
Zionism is racism.
And it's important to understand what he's saying.
Zionism
is racism.
Israel cannot be both.
Israel is either
a racist Jewish state
or it's a democratic state for everybody, and
that's what I would like Israel to be.
I'd like a democratic solution, one state with
equal rights for,
all its inhabitants.
Your organization,
Human Rights Watch, issued
a report last year,
about
Israel Mhmm. And the conclusion was it is
an apartheid
state.
And and there are 4 major
human rights groups in the last 2 years
who issued similar report reached the same conclusion.
Israel
is an apartheid state. So
apartheid is racism.
Apartheid
is discrimination.
But
Israel is the only member
of the United Nations that I know
which is officially racist.
And I say this
because of the,
July
2018
nation state law, which says That's right. The
Jews
have a unique
unique right to serve determination
in Israel.
Unique means exclusive. Yes. It means Arabs have
no right to serve the termination. Mhmm. It
means even if Arabs became a majority Mhmm.
They would still have no right to serve
the termination. Mhmm. So most certainly,
Zionism
is a,
is a racist ideology,
and it is largely responsible
for the Anakba
that has unfolded throughout the last century and
continues today.
Very important.
And there's no end to that, guys. Now,
you know, remember the days when Human Rights
Watch and Amnesty International?
You I mean, never should we have ever
blindly trusted any of these groups,
any of the governments,
any of the political I mean, that's always
how we should have been doing this. Question,
but verify. Question, but consider everything. Right?
Remember the days when at least they pretended
like the Human Rights Watch amnesty discussion mattered?
You know? Until October 7th forward, that's pretty
much how we ran with it. Right? We
don't know. The UN and the u the
international group, though, that that's where you look.
And then suddenly, it was like, they're all
racist.
Yeah. And they don't think that's gonna, like,
derail everything. It's it's just crazy how much
they lost control after this.
But, yeah, racism of any kind. Except for
this one, except for that one, except for
that if, you know, it's it's obvious what
he's doing. He wants you to think that
he doesn't actually believe it.
Tiberius says, Musk,
This is where he's, like, framing the conversation.
Musk says, why is rape legal in Britain?
Also, Musk supports gang rape in colony Israel.
Right?
It's shockingly obvious contradictions. Right? So if you
care about 1, why not the other? The
only way you can read that is either
he doesn't know about that, which I find
impossible,
or he doesn't care when it happens to
Palestinians.
Or doesn't care about either, but wants you
to look over in the UK anyway because
he wants you to miss what he's doing
here.
Musk, all racism is bad. Also, Musk, supports
racist genocide.
Musk, sore Soros paying politicians is anti democratic.
Also, Musk, spends over $200,000,000 to back Trump.
Right? Or the many other people backing Trump
right now in the same way. It says,
Musk, I defend free speech. Also, Musk, the
algorithm will restrict negative comments and criticism of
Israel constantly
or others. By the way, I just saw
something around,
I actually I forgot to respond to him
before I went live. Doctor David, Kaplan or
co Kaplan Copeland. I forget. We from the
COVID 19 time frame. Cartland.
Hold on. Let me look real quick.
Basically, I reached out to him because he
he I saw his post
about him being censored. Yeah. Cartland. Doctor David
Cartland.
Yeah. Doctor David Cartland. He let me just,
I'll I'll get back afterward. The point is
he responded with a different time, so I
have to respond back, but we're gonna set
up an interview. Because recently, he's been going,
talking about how he's being attacked, persecuted, for
his work around COVID 19. He's got this
group of doctors just going after him, trying
to get him censored and trying to get
him blacklisted. The point is, guys, that you
can still very clearly see that there are
elements on this platform still censoring around that
conversation.
I've shown you this from the moment this
started. It's not as constant as before. I
just think there's a much different thing happening
right now. But it's I mean, the fact
that we pretend this is even remotely a
free speech platform is so infuriating.
That doesn't mean that they're censoring everybody. I'm
talking. Yes. I know that. But it is
not a free speech platform. It's not all
it's not some you know, it's all or
nothing. Free speech is all or nothing.
That's how it works.
Musk hate speech will be demonetized,
also Musk, except for Zionist cheering on genocide
or all another one. Right? Where hate speech
is woke mindset.
Otherwise, we're censoring hate speech when ADLs tells
us to.
Same thing. But he goes, has there ever
been a bigger, more blatant charlatan?
Exactly. I'm glad to see there are some
people out there with honesty in this conversation.
But here he is going and this is
Ahmed Taha saying, Islam is is Islamist terrorists.
We ban them. You welcome them. Today, my
country, the UAE, placed 19 individuals and entities
on its local terrorist list for the direct
ties to the terrorist organization, Muslim Brotherhood.
Elon Musk just goes, why is Stormer harboring
known terrorists? Really, man? Like, you're actually gonna
make that statement while you guys are working
with the most obvious genocidal
terrorist group in the world?
Like, literally bombing and genociding multiple locations right
now, and you're gonna talk about them harboring
on terrorists, and on top of that, recognize
the Muslim brotherhood.
Hey. The overlaps are shocking. The overlaps go
through. Israel go through Saudi Arabia. They go
through I mean, it's absurd
to pretend like you don't know the terrorist
they're working with are work that are in
some way funded or at or at least
tied back to the groups you're working with.
But, you know, this is my point about
2016 forward. People woke up to this political
game and act like that's where the political
world started. There is an entire world of
history back there that shows you these people
are either that stupid or that dishonest.
Patrick Henningsen,
in regard to this Tesla owner Silicon Valley
account seems to be some Musk
Trump propaganda campaign now. It's just funny. It's
like they took this Tesla account
or it's got a 1000000 followers so you
could tell. Like, all of a sudden, it's
like it says the the the most notorious
Tesla club in the world. So I'm guessing
it's a Tesla club group that tapped into
Trump Elon world and just got blown up
for it, and it worked. That's That's how
it works. Alright? You tap the You you,
what is it? How do you follow
the right coattails, I guess? And that's how
that works. But, it says, at its heart,
wokeness is divisive, exclusionary, hateful. It basically gives
the people a shield to be mean and
cruel, he says.
And Patrick says, so Elon says that
it basically gives them a shield to be
mean and cruel, armored with false virtue. And
then he goes fascinating because that sounds exactly
like Zionism in Israel.
Now it's not that that is forced in
point. It's just the most relevant point right
now. He's supporting the most obvious contradiction to
what he thinks he's trying to present.
It goes rather ironic. That's an extreme from
a form of wokeness which Elon fully supports.
Extreme wokeness whose ultimate malignancy is carrying out
a genocide.
But it's the same point, guys. The woke
right conversation, which by right now I'm not
gonna get into today is, like, kinda being
hijacked by another part of it. It's fascinating
to me. The point is the woke right
is very real. And it's not like the
right that the other right doesn't like. It's
just about the idea that people anywhere on
the right who are doing the same things,
calling for censorship on their side. Or,
what's the you know, the little TikTok and
people fired from from,
Home Depot or there's many different examples I've
shown you. It's just it's you know when
you see it. It's the same thing you
saw on the left, but coming from their
agendas.
And it's it's just constant right now. And
it's and it's the largely being shown around
this whole conversation,
the Elon overlap, the censorship dynamic is real,
but it really has come out in full
color.
But on top of that, Elon's just directly
supporting Zionism, which is exactly I mean, do
you not realize how Zionism itself or Israel
itself was has been for years
hoarding the entire left conversation? Now all of
a sudden, it's like, they're good. I mean,
it's it's just
no matter what they present to you, people
that don't wanna look further will take them
at what they've at face value.
I don't think that's the majority.
Now here's an interesting overlap.
Talking about censorship, talking about what he's discussing.
So right now, my opinion is clear. I
think Elon Musk knows what he's doing. I
think he's tapped in through the Zionist technocrat
kind of this larger agenda that supersedes even
the US government conversation. I think it's very
clear. I think we're watching the globalist agenda
and the the rollout.
The North American Union I mean, guys, it's
just so transparent right now.
Now that's all my opinion. I would never
say, like, the Alice Jones style that we
know the globalist plot and it's proven because
tweets and sheets of paper. My point is,
obviously, we can't prove that. That's what I
think is the reality, but let me lay
out the facts that we have. That's how
that's supposed to work. Here,
Elon Musk, it says we have no choice
but to eliminate the people who would oppose
the state of Israel.
This guy responds,
eliminate us, b I t c h, with
a huge swastika.
Okay. That was January 9th. Now look. I'm
never, look. That's just a that's just an
image.
Even even even with mean words. It's just
words and an image. If it offends you,
then look somewhere else. Now I I think
the the very point of doing that and
trying to make it that makes you a
disgusting person. Because of the context of how
you're trying to do that.
But still free speech. And if you're unwilling
to support that, then you don't believe in
free speech. And that's not wrong. Maybe you
just but it is if you pretend you
are.
If you don't think it's okay, then just
lean into it and be like, I think
limited speech is the future. That's fine. I
will even have a conversation about it. But
just be honest about not believing in free
speech because that's what that entails. What's interesting
to me in this conversation
is that right now, I think it's clear
that Elon has tapped in with the Zionist
agenda.
And yet, on this platform, they are centering
like mad. Things that are calling out Israel.
The ADL has been clear. And I'll get
I'll have a point about that later on
the TikTok thing.
And and and yet he allows this,
despite censoring
Kanye West,
for something that was even less contentious
right in the beginning of all this. So
explain that for me. Now watch watch what
you'll see what I mean. This is just
a couple of examples.
Many of them are under Elon himself. It
says, how many Sharia law courts are there
in the UK? See,
forcing you look over there. This guy simply
says wake up. It's the Jews. And post
a massive swastika.
January 9th.
I mean, people are tagging this stuff. I
mean, even community notes is tagged on that.
You think they don't see this? But my
point is you're I there if you look
down the comments on some of these, there
is people tagging it left and right. I'll
show you one that's been tagging Elon every
day going, why are you allowing this? My
point is that this is still there. I
would argue it shouldn't be censored. But if
we're gonna make that a not censored point,
even if it's disgusting,
then you shouldn't be censoring criticism of Israel
either.
But what's weird to me, and I'm sure
people that don't know deeper the conversation, you're
already sensing why that's weird. Right? Well, gee,
if he's censoring anti Israel content, why wouldn't
he be censoring that too? Because isn't it
the same thing? You would think, wouldn't you?
The point here, I'm very clearly convinced the
fact that this is an agenda. Do you
have people like this that are being allowed
to exist on Twitter so that they can
make that narrative? This is a zai this
is the god Saad, however you say his
name, point.
Stoking these things,
my I mean, I think the obvious point
is if you're gonna censor things over here
because they're saying, you know, Israel murdered kids
in Gaza,
why wouldn't you censor that? Neither should be
censored, but it clearly shows you they want
this stuff to exist. That's how I would
read it, but I could be wrong.
There's one of them. There's another one. Here
it is, another one on the 30th December,
saying Tesla Starlink streaming while in flight. And
it says the same thing. Whites will rise.
Or some says something different. Post the same
thing. And it just seems clumsy. It seems
consistent and it seems constant. And I don't
think that seems like a normal thing to
me. It mean I think it's about getting
this in front of everybody underneath Elon's posts,
or he could just be a POS.
Here's just a post of his own
saying, let's clear something up. F Israel and
f Palestine.
F you both each yeah. It it kill
each other, we don't care.
So take that for what you will. Because,
you know, the point is that clearly he
doesn't support Palestine. And I think the agenda
is we're supposed to pretend we hate Israel,
but maybe he does. Maybe he hates both.
But here is the media side of this.
I just wanna show you kinda briefly how
many times this has been done. So here's
a new one. This one's under the thing
saying, won't happen in regard to them saying
that they'll we'll just we must destroy them
all, nazis and whatever else.
But look at this.
Look at how many times for the podcast.
That's just a few there, but watch this.
Look at that. These are all different posts.
And this this is not that long ago.
This is,
January 11th.
Look at how many posts there are. Over
and over. It's almost like that. Look, they
just f Palestine,
and it's not it's not even that old.
Honest opinion? I think it's a bot. I
think this is about trying to convince people.
Look. Expose these Jewish lies, it says.
Then in the in where he's from, it
says, United States of Jubaica. I mean, guys,
this is exactly what you would think a
Zionist would pretend we're doing.
That's my opinion, but I'm not saying I
can prove that. I but we kept proving
that happens. Just be clear about that. Whether
this is one of those examples, that's for
you to decide.
Very interesting though, isn't it? And interesting why
they're still there.
And, k, you would look through these. There's
people tagging these constantly. Twitter. What's going on?
Community notes. How is this allowed?
That is clearly contradictory to what they're doing
everywhere else and what they claim. Right?
Now, even more so when you recognize that
back on the 20 on December 2, 2022,
Elon Musk suspends
Ye or Kanye West's Twitter account after what
they called a swastika post. But it wasn't
even a swastika. Do you remember? We we
talked about all this. Now if I couldn't
find the show I did on this, I
couldn't remember what the title was. The point
was and this the guy talks about right
here. It's not a swastika. And you you
can look this up. It's not even some
kind of a a trick or some kind
of thing. It's some random group called the
Raelians.
And apparently, the group, you can look it
up for yourself, it what it it it
encapsulates it actually is the opposite of a
swastika.
Right? If you look at the other side
of it, we just talked about this the
other day actually. One goes one way, one
goes the other. It doesn't even matter. And
then and then basically,
if it's a cross versus a an x.
Right? So when it's a cross
which way was it? Hold on. Let me
make sure.
Let's get the image of the other one.
Right. So if it's at an angle like
that, so it's a it's an x as
opposed to a cross, that's the Nazi symbol.
And if it's going clockwise
because this is an old old ancient symbol
that goes back to Buddhist times. They're really
just, I think, means power or something. It's
it's not was never a racist symbol until
it was picked up by the Nazis. But
you can see this one is the other
way and it's straight. Right? Then it's surrounded
by the star of David, which by the
way was also not a Jewish symbol before
Israel used it for that purpose.
The point though
is they removed this,
but they said looked like a star of
David. But what it ultimately is is some
kind of alien thing. But they actually they
write about it. They argue that what this
is is some kind of a like, they're
waiting for the aliens to return, and this
is meant to be a symbol of, like,
the Buddhist symbol crossed with the star of
David. It it really was not racist at
the origin point. At least that's what they've
always argued from the beginning when they made
this.
So he posts this and posts
love everyone, hashtag lovespeech.
And he censored that account. I still think
that was planned. I don't even know how
that even makes sense when there was other
swastikas, actual swastikas,
right on the page.
All over Twitter.
And he did this one. How do you
not see that for what it is? There's
something going on here as he's allowing these
other ones right now. Doesn't that seem silly?
Here's a guy who I think has a
pretty
8 8,000 followers
saying, seriously? And he's calling out Elon, support,
Twitter, going guys, look and even re re,
reported it. And it's saying, we appreciate it.
There's no there'd be no violations.
Now, be clear again. I'm not calling for
censorship. I don't think it should be censored
as much as you may find it disgusting
as much as it is offensive.
Or, you know, maybe. I'm not offended by
much, but I argue I understand the way
he's using it is supposed to be offensive,
right? And then if he's called like he
says in this picture, f these, you know,
Jew rat or whatever he says right there.
That's the disgusting person that deserves to be
called disgusting.
But he has the right to say it.
And they don't care.
And he goes, yeah. Clearly. And it there's
another person calling it out saying, hey. What
is this? And it's simply a bot response
going, thanks for reaching out. We'll get back
to you within a few days. Nothing happened.
So how do you not read that as
Twitter is allowing that on the platform? When
they would censor far less examples of things
they claim? And but that right there is
a violation of their terms of service.
How do you not read that for what
it is? Now on this la on the
segment here, I just wanna include these different
parts of this conversation.
August 12, 2024, we had the show called
the rise of partisan psychological warfare. Not to
say that's a new thing, but it was
this very specific part of it. And and,
like, the term actually, partisan psychological warfare at
a has a specific meaning. It doesn't just
mean left and right, you know, psy opping
each other. It gets into, like, this weirdest
development of specific, like, fake groups. It's really
terrifying. But this is what we're seeing. And
it's happening all over. Then we talked about
on December 28, 2024.
Make America healthy again with in parenthesis with
GMOs, pharmaceuticals, AI, nanotech, which is the way
they're really doing it, but it's not really
healthy at all. And the partisan implosion. So
we started to see this really weird breakdown.
Right? Of the oh, the h one b
one, h one b conversation, a lot of
these different kinda shifts, Elon Musk censoring people.
And then we just covered this as of
11th,
the great partisan rebranding.
And it's weird, man. We're seeing a lot
of this weirdness where, you know, Zuckerberg and
every it's
it's a 100 red flags in a row
that they're all just pretending means they're winning.
It's kind of scary.
That was just January 11th. Now we also
talk about the LA wildfires, which we're gonna
briefly touch on in a second. But lastly,
on the partisan side of things,
the USCP
chief on inauguration security.
The biggest threat
remains the lone actor.
I don't even know how you think that
makes sense. Like, so statistically speaking, if all
you're saying is every time we've had one
of these incidents that it's
been an individual,
that that means that lone actors have been
I I don't think we've ever proven these
individuals are all acting of their own individual
accord. In fact, usually, I think it's the
opposite. But that's my personal opinion.
But now the point, guys, it seems like
the stage is being set. Right? The biggest
threat remains the lone actor.
Like, well, I thought the biggest threat of
court well, he would say this, but, you
know, the conversation is the the democrat plot
to stop them from where is that? I
I keep hearing that from certain people, but
I don't see it developing.
Wouldn't surprise me.
Wait and see. How much you wanna bet
if it goes off without a hitch
that you won't hear another word about it?
But they were screaming about this provable evidence
in all these different interviews about the plot
to overthrow Trump.
We'll see. As you know, I think they're
all fighting you in the same way.
Now on the point of the fire. Now
we went over this in the last show,
but I wanna give you some other update
points on this that I think are interesting.
Now as again, as of today, I'm still
of the mind to make this very clear.
It's the same as as the other conversation.
Now I don't I really don't care if
this frustrates people that just want me to
make a conclusion even though it's not provable.
I don't think you could prove the full
picture of what people are saying
in regard to this manufactured,
you know, very Alex Jones esque, great reset.
They did it by design.
And if you haven't seen the show, you'd
be very, very mistaken if you think that
means I don't think that's possible.
But what's what's very important as I as
this and, you know, it shouldn't be something
I have to force in. You'd think that
other people representing journalism or research or anything
would air on the side of we need
proof to report something.
But you we'd be you'd be wrong. It's
crazy today.
So the point is if we're we're watching
all this happen and I went over very
clearly yesterday, and I'll a couple more points
today. The obvious overlap with the great reset,
the LA Smart
city conversation,
you know, the as we've seen in Lahaina
in the same way, the the many different
ways you can see Gavin Newsom enriching himself.
And I'll play that. So I'll point it
to it again. The way he basic I
mean, it's everything speaks to malfeasance, enrichment, and
and criminal activity.
Nobody should dismiss that. And on top of
that, we should make it very clear that's
not unique to democrats and it's not unique
to California.
It's pretty much the government, guys, and I
think it's pretty clear.
But from that point forward,
I don't see the proof that this was
an engineered effort to do this for the
great reset.
I don't think that proof exists. If you
see it, send it to me, and I
will happily talk about it. But I'll still
highlight why that might be the case. I
just want you to think about the people
out there that are screening that as an
absolute fact
because it works for partisan narratives and it
also distracts from the literal great reset rolling
out underneath the people those people are supporting.
I think that's what it's really about. The
people right now trying to force you to
look at one thing are clearly ignoring that
Elon was just on a sense a censorship
tantrum, that he was clearly showing that he
doesn't believe the things he actually does, that
he's reflexively dismissing all these different topics, that
he's I mean, everything.
And the North American Union conversation and the
annexing a different territory,
one after another, or Elon Musk rolling out
the great reset in his own way.
But let's not talk about any of that.
Let's focus on the thing they want you
to look at and give you half the
story. Screaming globalism, but never pointing at one
of the main aspects of globalism. Like, there's
a clear constant element of that.
My point in saying that I think is
important or the reason I'm saying it's important
is because we we are being overrun
by a lot of this kind of forceful
partisan fake Twitter media stuff. And it's constant,
guys. Just show discernment. But, hey, Twitter is
not a bad place to look for information.
You just have to constantly consider that any
given time, half of it could be false.
I mean, if we know that every the
Internet right now is hap most studies will
tell you somewhere between 50% bots. That's not
a joke. It's pretty roundly accepted at this
point. Some of them are benign, you know,
but they do certain functions, but a lot
of them are exactly what you think. And
I on that note, actually, I'll bring up
the
the tweet, the thread that Sensor Band did.
Just because it's important to see this stuff.
And go through this, I'm gonna do it
right now. If you haven't seen this, this
is important.
It shows you that CHEQ,
the CEO, sat down with Elon Musk and
basically convinced him to take this company. This
is an Israeli intelligence entity, and it's being
used to fight bots.
And guess what we've seen since? An overwhelming
show of Israeli bots.
It didn't go away. And, of course, Censored
Man highlighted that the he could see based
on their liking, that it was so rapid,
like, with Elon Musk going, yes. True. What?
Exclamation mark. Within, like, half a second, which
shows you that it's not really him. Same
thing here. You could see that they were
liking consistently. They would like the same ones
in the same time frame and Censored Man
was proving which one were the bots. And
then just like that, they said, well, no.
We're not gonna really demonstrate the likes anymore.
Oops.
Total coincidence though. Right? And they're still using
Authentic and all the rest of these really
intelligence elements. Shouldn't be surprising
why that's happening
as As they're taking your biometrics for the
Israeli intelligence apparatus.
Doesn't seem it seems like a pretty obvious
point. Did I save that? There it goes.
But,
Brighton Circus points out the Santa Yanes reservoir
is located less than 1 mile from where
the fire started. This is another example of
just, you know, malfeasance.
It has a capacity of a 117,000,000
gallons of water, but it has been empty
for over a year. That reservoir was due
to reopen in 2 weeks.
It was a repair that cost point 00032
percent of California's total yearly tax revenue.
So right there is a point where you
get people going, come on. Doesn't that prove
to you? No. It doesn't, guys. It does
not prove it. It's another very important data
point
showing that it could mean it's resolved by
design.
Never would I dismiss that possibility, but if
you're willing to jump from evidence to proof
without it having then you don't care about
it proving it. And that then means that
you're never gonna have accountability, which is how
this game works. They know that. They're willing
to look incompetent
to get away with being criminal all the
time. And the bottom line is if you
can't prove criminality, they're not gonna go to
prison. I mean, half the time or 90%
of the time they prove criminality. They don't
go to prison. So when you get these
fake partisan grifters out there, forcing in a
story that you can't prove because you're skipping
over the proving part, guess what?
It's designed to never change anything. But it'll
sure as hell make you upset. And that
causes you to lose logic, causes you to
lash out, causes partisan division,
all circles back around.
The bottom line is malfeasance is everywhere. And
could this mean they did this so this
would happen?
Absolutely. Could this mean they did this and
then they made it happen? Absolutely.
Can we prove that? At this moment, I
don't think so.
Now here is one of the points I
think you shouldn't miss. I just this was
a clip that, see?
Notice you don't see the person's name.
That only happens on certain people.
You'll see it right here, I think. Yep.
Look at that. Oh, was there. BlacTruther is
the one that made this video. I was
gonna I will try and get it to
you really quickly. Hear me do this.
Before it disappears. Tell you guys, that's so
ridiculous. There you go.
Just notice that. Notice that it disappears. So
that mean that Twitter doesn't want you to
see that they shared it. How is that
make not how does that not show you
that? It's not a glitch. It's very specific.
But thank you, the black shooter, for sharing
this. Broke out this little part about the
EPA.
Now this is just simply going through it.
And I simply said the US government through
just the Trump and Biden administrations, the first
Trump administration obviously, have given California over 6
$5,000,000,000
for water infrastructure. That's both to sanitation and
also clean water, but water infrastructure.
And I said, sure. Seems like we deserve
some answers on where that all went and
why the federal government continued to give give
them more
at Trump and Biden. Now that doesn't have
to be some damning point. You'd argue that
Trump would feel he should give money to
a con a state that might need help
with their clean water. But it doesn't line
up with the narratives we're told.
That they're they see the democrats and how
they're stealing and doing, you know, and the
and the everything we're saying right now. So
if you wanna make this partisan, you have
to acknowledge that Trump also gave them 1,000,000,000
of dollars in money for water infrastructure
and every year continue to do so, not
every time 1,000,000,000, but over the whole period,
every time continue to give them more despite
what? Not seeing anything change? How do you
wouldn't wouldn't Trump go time out? I'm a
businessman. We're giving you $300,000,000. What did you
do with the last 267?
What happened?
But they didn't do that. Neither Biden nor
Trump because they're all on the same side,
and it's all part of the same agenda.
That's my opinion. But watch through this real
quick.
Starts on 2010, which is, you know, that
before Trump. The rest of them are Trump
and Biden. $300,000,000,
California, 2010.
182,000,000?
That is
where is that? Oh, it's, January 2016 during
Trump or right before Trump's administration. Or no,
that was during. No. Right before 2017 is
when he came in. And then a 182,000,000.
This one's 14,000,000. There's 95,000,000 for 2,017.
And these are all
for water, for the podcast. For wastewater, for
water infrastructure.
173,500,000
for California drinking water. That's 2,018.
196,000,000,
2020.
In still in Trump's administration, 108,000,000.
October 2020. So at this point, at this
point, you'd be like, wouldn't he be going
why how do we pass him? Now this
is the EPA, but this is under Trump's
administration. They still have influence over all of
this.
196,000,000.
May 2024 or 2020. Oh, I I gotta
guess back and forth with the clip. It's
a 108.
Let's go to 2021.
Oh, it says it's December 2020. That's more.
85,000,000.
November, that's back 1, but it's 2020 still.
500,000,000.
That's wild. That's still Trump. At the end
of his administration, gave them 500,000,000
more dollars. They're well past 1,000,000,000 at this
point.
85,000,000.
2020.
December,
even more.
Okay. Now we go to 2021.
600,000,000.
Off the rate, you just had 4 years
of over 1,000,000,000 of dollars for just one
thing, or other water infrastructure, which is more
than one thing, but one category. And they
come in, and Biden gives you $600,000,000
for water infrastructure. And let's be clear, guys,
that because this is not unique to just
California, but it seems to be a specially
problematic spot.
9 609,000,000,
2022.
My god.
67,000,000,
2022.
It's a 166,000,000
more. 2023.
100 and 391,000,000 more. 2023.
This one's 690,000,000
to improve water quality infrastructure.
That one.
April 2023.
Over half a 1000000000
for drinking water. 2024.
269,000,000
later in
2024. 276,000,000
later in 2024.
And then in general, I just highlighted that
$5,800,000,000
was put out by the Biden administration for
drinking water. Despite the fact that you can
still do this very day prove that over
half this country's drinking water is riddled with
lead and chemicals.
Where is this money going?
And do not for one second pretend that
it's some unique Democrat problem, guys. It is
not.
I'm tired of how to play that game
because all it does is guarantee the problem
continues.
I'm really trying to stress that point, guys,
because it really does. If we really actually
want change, we gotta stop playing this partisan
game.
Now Sky News highlights
something that Gavin Newsom said. Now this shouldn't
be surprising.
Now I there's 2 ways I look at
this.
It's very well, I guess more than 2,
but the main ones is it could very
well be that he is kind of signaling
to you that this is a plan, which
I don't think is something that's
should be dismissed.
Whether you wanna talk about, like, revelation of
the method or, you know, some kind of
a a an effort where they think they
need to show you to get your acceptance,
whatever it may be. These things are not
whether you believe it or not, the point
is whether they think they they believe in
what that means. Deeper conversation.
The point though,
he says we already have a team
reimagining
an LA 2 point o.
On m it's on MSNBC or NBC's
meet the press.
So, I mean, think about this. As we're
and, again, with this is with this as
well. This is the actual document from December
2020.
Smart LA 2028.
But I well, this is an important one,
especially with what just happened.
But just just like with Lahaina, for example.
Right? You you should not dismiss whether this
might be the very reason or maybe even
why. And this is where I think it's
more logical what we currently see that maybe
things were pulled at the moment like with
Lahaina, which is, by the way, just as
big a story and just as criminal.
That maybe they somebody somewhere decided to kind
of pull something back in hopes that it
got a little bit more so they could
have this be more likely. Businessmen or people
in the government or lobbyists or people in
you know, who knows?
If you think that's not how the world
works, you are lying to yourself.
All that's possible from one ray one range
to the other. That it was completely manufactured
all the way to the point to where
none of it was manufactured, and it just
worked out that way.
You know that.
This is important because it goes back to
2020 though. And you will find very similar
plans like this in a lot of places
in this country. Many are Republican.
Of Course, you know, at that time, he
was, oh, they're rhinos. And maybe you're right.
The point is though that it's easy to
make out to be one or the other.
It's a nonpartisan
agenda.
It truly is. I mean, it's very clear.
If you can't see Elon Musk and all
the rest of them sprinting in this direction
in Trump's administration, then you're blinding yourself. But
it is so important to think about that.
Reimagining?
But see, the important thing about this,
he knows the terms he's using. These people
have
handlers. And I don't mean that in the
weird and it could mean that in the
weird sense. But I mean, like, just, you
know, political teams that tell him what to
say, what to wear.
Reimagining
is clearly tied to the, you know,
great reset for the most part. So him
saying that, I don't think it's by accident.
So they might know that you'll react to
it.
But, nonetheless, the point is that it could
just be that they're now doing that. Even
if it's just as nefarious as you might
think it is, it may it just been
there was a fire and now we're gonna
make that happen.
Consider all of that.
But nonetheless, now taking advantage of it, which
should also be a story.
Biden, of course. This one I just found
interesting. Yeah. You can play this if you
want. I think this just these are things
they're saying. This one says, basically, Biden the
the gist of it is Biden in a
very weird way with, of course, weird cryptic
music in the background, talking about how the
fires looked weird like a like an attack.
Like, some areas were hit and some weren't.
Now, again, same point. I mean, it just
seems like a little too on the nose
that he would say that and that, you
know, it'd be such an easy thing for
you to go, oh, you know, oh my
god. You just said the thing that we're
not supposed to say. It's like, you know,
maybe I just it doesn't prove anything. It's
just Biden rambling and maybe he said the
thing he wasn't supposed to say. Yes. But
even if that is what happened, it still
does not prove that that was all manufactured
to him pointing out that it was some
kind of a selective point. But, yes, we
should consider these obvious points.
But what I wanna highlight is that
I've talked I mean, I've had in the
past, like, especially around paradise time,
Very I talked to a lot of firemen
around that.
And the conversation
is, yes, them they were very obvious anomalies
and we covered them. But at the same
time,
there's a lot of things that were covered
that were not
abnormal.
You have to realize a lot of these
people like the sorters of the world that
are highlighting these very look at those trees
and look at those only houses. Yes. That
is interesting and maybe it's a sign of
something if you
but there's also clear ways that can happen.
It happens every fire where you have sparks
that drift away and land on rooftops and
burn in areas that aren't that overwhelmingly
burned, but that and so you get houses
burned down, but the trees are not that
are
alive and more and full of sap and
water and, you know, whatever else. Some trees
are more dry. They'll burn more rapidly. Some
have to have more intense fire to truly
catch on fire.
Again, maybe that's just
point is it could obviously be something.
It could also clearly be explained by the
anomalous actions of fire with wind and different
moisture in the air depending on where you
are, higher elevation. I mean, these are basic
things to understand and easy things to ignore
when you just wanna make it a bombastic
story.
I know. This is I'm sure plenty of
people get frustrated this because they love it's
more fun to always pretend that we know
it's a big psyop. Maybe it is though.
And by doing that, you're hurting the possible
truth outcome.
But Biden's mumbled something about being directed targeted
or may look that way, and now we
know for sure.
And I'll just reiterate what,
Carrie Wedler said.
Simply, you know, you can read it, watch
the clip. This is Jason Bassler doing a
clip about this.
But the the the tweet you're seeing right
in that, she's simply making the point. You
know, I I love the way she starts.
She goes, I know a lot of people
know exactly what caused the fires, but I'm
wondering how many people are spouting off about
it with such certainty are aware, for example,
of past fires that were caused by this
and that and whatever. And she goes, I
wanna make it clear. I'm not she's not
trying to say that I'm ignoring these possibilities.
I very much think these could be the
case. But are you are you also considering
these other things? Because her point is just
the same. You can't prove any of these
things you're trying to put out there. So
at this point, when we know we can't
prove it, why are we only highlighting this
one? What about this? And now this does
seem to be the way it's developing, which
we should be skeptical about because it may
be a way to hide some larger thing.
But unless there is proof of the larger
thing, we can't keep saying that's the case.
Like, even the evidence used to highlight the
idea that it was a great reset executed
plan
is not evidence of that. It's evidence of
malfeasance.
And then saying that malfeasance then means they
did it on purpose, which that there's not
even evidence to say that. It's just showing
you that they're rich in themselves. But but
I would never dismiss that possibility.
Now this is
oh, I guess well, I was gonna say
the point what she's saying is, you know,
the idea clearly that
well, I'll I'll hold back on that. I
think I was jumping ahead a little bit.
But for the point is that clearly, we
should be skeptical of all things, partisan narratives,
corporate media,
everything.
Now, this point becomes very telling in that
exact framing.
That right now,
like North Carolina, which I'll point you in
a second, with with the hurricane.
Right? Became a very clear focus on lithium,
which is a very fair point to make
right now with everything going on in the
world. But I very interestingly found out that
there was a much more important story there
that even conservatives were calling out.
They got completely blacked out by the main
conservative
Republican Team Smart politics side, which was courts.
And I covered this. I'll show you in
a second.
But it blew me away.
Like, you have something and I'll show you
well, just really quickly, I'll come back to
it.
Tiny backwater town in North Carolina, which by
the way was literally literally in the epicenter
of the hurricane, but never forget no one
wants to talk about it. Not not the
main circles.
It says, will help fuel the world's AI
revolution
with enough quartz to powder an entire $350,000,000,000
semiconductor global industry.
Literally the one location in the world.
That's actually what this it's crazy to me.
For this special quartz sand or powder or
whatever they call it, I think it's sand,
That's necessary for the way the AI revolution
is going. Now lithium also plays a very
large part in that. Arguably, this is far
more important because there's only one location in
the world for this.
And this doesn't become while it's in the
actual center of the entire thing, doesn't become
the I wonder why.
Gee, just a shot in the dark. Maybe
it's because the people they support are avidly
interested in that direction, and that became a
little uncomfortable.
But if we just make it about lithium,
that generally ties back to the larger great
reset point which we pretend isn't Elon Musk
Even though he literally said, we'll coo whoever
we want when confronted about lithium and Venezuela.
But, you know, partisans like to ignore. Partisans
are gonna partisan. Right? But we'll come back
to that.
The point here is that now suddenly, in
this conversation about the fire, it turns out,
what do you know, Edison
International is connected to BlackRock and Vanguard,
which is important. Right? Because I think these
companies are very, very problematic.
But what's interesting is you're getting that called
out by some people
and ignoring the connection to Elon Musk.
Or ignoring it entirely because it changes the
conversation. It's really fascinating how this all kinda
spinning out. But Jonathan says, holy s h
I t. You'll never guess who are the
top 2 largest stakeholders of the electric company
that may have been responsible for the Eaton
Fire. Now, again, quickly, that's even what New
York Post is saying, yesterday.
Hearst Fire may have been caused by damaged
power lines, says Edison International. Now that's an
easy way to I mean, I wouldn't say
easy.
That's especially with the way PG and E
has played out. They know they could be
on the hook for that. Like, literally
financially and legally.
So I wouldn't say that's much of a,
you know, cop out. But if it's about
a larger plan, they would always be happy
to throw someone like this on the bus
to hide the larger agenda. But, nonetheless,
interesting is developing that way. We'll come back
to that.
Fiorella says, breaking, 2 of the largest stakeholders
of Edison International,
the electric company accused of being responsible for
the fire are Vanguard and BlackRock. Happy Monday,
folks.
And Abolish Empire says it's almost like the
people who want everyone to own nothing and
be happy, or the Elon version, you'll say
nothing and be happy. Kinda that's what they
were joking about on Twitter. And destroying any
chance of final security the peasants have left.
Man, there I go being anti Semitic again.
The point though,
is you really wanna make this I mean,
it is. The great the great reset. That's
what it means. Own nothing to be happy.
That's the COVID 19 era, great reset, World
Economic Forum overlap. Right? Well, let's pretend the
World Economic Forum, Lindy Ikarino, is not literally
running Twitter. Let's pretend like the ADL and
all the rest are not literally working through
the same thing. Let's pretend like Elon Musk
is not rolling out every element of the
same project using artificial intelligence and talking about
solar cars. You know, it's it's just so
embarrassing how obvious it always. But
he at least, you know
oh, it's not even about him. Because the
point is that right now, Elon's not even
brought to the conversation. Right? So Edison International
has a connection to BlackRock. That's important. So
the conversation then becomes, like, is there a
bigger story here? Right? And as usual, you're
already getting the larger partisan accounts that are
just connecting dots without making any proof or
even evidence at the time, saying because they're
there, therefore, we know it's part of this.
And
it's more entertaining. Sure. A lot of people
love that. But right now, that's what's happening
to a lot of this. Already overlapping it
with c, it's a democrat plot. Alex Jones
and all the rest, that's being lapped up.
But weirdly enough, ignoring a huge overlap to
this story.
And, again, the point is even New York
New York Post, which is a very clear
let right leaning pro Israel platform that seems
to have already lied many times around both
of those topics. But it says a downed
power line owned by the company at its
international may have caused the hearse fire, company
officials said in a press release on Sunday.
Doesn't seem to give any real pushback on
it.
Now here is what I find interesting in
all of this. So if you forgot,
Musk's a I x AI, which I'm convinced
is the extension of DARPA's program. It's just
it's obvious to me, but you can decide
for yourself. Here's the article on that. The
quiet transition from DARPA's x AI to Elon's
x AI, like everything else it seems.
But BlackRock, among others, like Sequoia Capital,
and what was the other one? Some other
problematic entities, BlackRock
gave $6,000,000,000
in funding to Elon Musk's AI, x AI,
which of course, it's like, well, how are
you gonna get funding somewhere? You got you
know, interesting how the only 2 that don't
really matter when it's BlackRock is Elon Musk
getting billions in funding. And the fact that
Rumble has 2 of the 3 top stakeholders
are Vanguard and BlackRock. That's Rumble Inc.
Now you could argue it means nothing.
But if you're gonna make it make mean
something in one context, it should mean something
everywhere. Right? So BlackRock has an influence over
these entities. Like, if if you're gonna play
and they have influence over any entity they're
invested in. That's the point. But you know
it's selectively ignored when it comes to certain
things. So either it's all
taken out of context or it all matters.
And if it all matters, then Elon Musk
should be considered compromised.
But it's up to you to decide.
Now, you know, Ian Miles Chan, of course,
he seems to be like the chief, you
know, coattail chaser
for Elon Musk. He says, oh, great. The
conspiracy tards are going after Elon Musk for
supposed
connections to BlackRock now. That's supposed, man. He'd
and all we're saying is he's been funded
by BlackRock. Are you are you saying it's
false? He goes, y'all know it's an investment
company. Right?
It's it's just so embarrassing these people. Like,
you're you're talking to the group that has
been diving through BlackRock. It's not just an
investment company, you absolute moron.
It's called a shadow bank by even the
company the corporate feel. It's just so funny
how desperate these people will try to gaslight
for Elon Musk. But he's probably making tons
of money. Again,
I mean, look.
He's got a 1000000 followers, guys.
If Laura Loomer had 200,000 followers, which she
which they admitted about her in the space.
Think about how much money these people are
making. 100 of 1,000 of dollars a month.
You just that is not something that you
have to there that will change people's stances
on political talk topics.
Dishonest people, but it will.
And then it's but here's the,
thing Marissa Hanson says, while everybody else was
arguing about h one b visas,
BlackRock made a massive investment to x a
I. 6,000,000,000.
And she says, I'm sure the timing of
these arguments after tripping the Internet had nothing
to do with keeping this announcement on the
down announcement on the down low.
So wait a minute.
She says,
they invested in him,
and while that was happening, this was the
conversation.
I'm sure there's no connection.
Okay, Ian Myles Chong. Exactly what did she
get wrong there? Exactly what did she get
as a a conspiracy tard? Or even what
did she say that suggested that she had
he didn't she didn't suggest anything. She said
they're funding him. Are you suggesting that's false?
Supposed connections? This guy is a child. And
absolutely all of these people are so desperate
and so I mean, you must know that
he knows we're not that stupid or some
of us will call him out. Just look
in the chat. They know and they don't
care, guys. But I'll tell you what. When
you're making however much money they're making, it
probably is easy easy not to care for
people with no morals. Right?
But Elon says BlackRock owns less than point
point 5 of x AI. Uh-oh.
Elon Musk just admitted BlackRock owns part of
his company.
Yeah. There are many investors. Yeah. I'm fired.
But how many of those other investors are
secretly invested by BlackRock?
How many of those other companies are secret
shell companies for other groups we're talking about?
Maybe foreign companies.
But Marissa says, why would XAI do business
with them in the first place?
That that's the question, guys. Not the sidestep
where in that Elon sup blind supporters are
gonna go, well, it's just point 5. Would
you care if it was point 001 if
it was Kamala Harris?
Would you care if any amount was owned
in a
Biden company?
You don't even need to answer that, guys.
You all know the answer. They would go
out of their way to make it a
bigger because it it it matters when it's
a Democrat to them. My point is it
matters everywhere.
She says, certainly, there are better investment opportunities
and alternatives than BlackRock, which is basically like
evil corp. But he doesn't care, you see?
He wants you to think it matters when
it works for his political agenda. He is
part of this team, guys.
It's obvious.
BlackRock is literally investing in Elon Musk's company.
He literally is running DARPA's entity. He literally
works for Biden's administration as a military contractor.
He's literally tapped into the military industry complex
for everything he's working on. He's rolling out
an artificial intelligence. He's actually working with the
National Reconnaissance Office to build out a spy
satellite network that they're telling you you can't
hide from. Does anything sound like rebels fighting
the deep state?
Or does it start to sound like the
technocracy,
They
like, barely pretending not to be.
Just sad.
Now here's interesting point. This is 2023. Jordan
Peterson says, ESG. And we talked about that
a lot. Right? Environments,
social governance. The point is it's like the
DEI or the the woke mindset discussion. Right?
And he says, pushers like BlackRock. Okay. So
we're to pretend that you guys are aware
that BlackRock is pushing the woke mindset, but
you still allow them to invest and own
part of your company.
Anybody wanna be honest enough to point out
how dumb that is?
And Elon says, major problem.
His typical nonsense.
Jordan Peterson says, your pension is probably held
by BlackRock. Find out and divest or live
seriously to regret it. BlackRock is not is
not evil central. It's close.
Miss BlackRock is now majority stakeholder in Twitter.
Sure aged well. Now that did change at
least at least let me show you what
this looks like. That was recent, by the
way. So that might I think they're misunderstanding
the way it went. But, nonetheless, the point
is to show you that they all notice
these things.
But it doesn't matter when it works for
Elon.
Now what's interesting about this?
BlackRock Twitter stake. Now it says BlackRock's ownership
in Twitter as of the end of 2021
is that they own 52.1
percent of the of Twitter.
Now historical investment, it says in 2013,
BlackRock bought shares in Twitter, val vault valuing
the company at 9,000,000,000
after early employees sold their shares. Then it
says, and as of 2022,
institutional investors, including BlackRock, held about 70% of
Twitter's total outstanding shares,
with BlackRock specifically
holding 6.7%
of the company's stock. Now 2022 is when
Elon took over.
Now it says,
Twitter's acquisition.
On April 25, 2022,
Twitter announced it had entered into a definitive
agreement to be to be acquired by Elon
Musk,
CEO of Tesla. This acquisition was finalized in
2024.
So at the end of at the beginning
of 2022,
BlackRock
institutional
investors
owned 70%,
while BlackRock on record had 6.7.
So right before it changed hands, BlackRock changed,
make it so they
people that they controlled
took over 70% of that control, while they
maintained 6.7%.
Then Elon buys a company, and we don't
know what happened.
That's why David, Dave, Dave, Dave, Dave, David
Ike is saying, well, what about
Pete Diddy is a backer? Well, he is.
Jack Dorsey apparently is still a backer. All
these people are still apparently involved, but that
doesn't matter.
All you're all screaming about what's going on
in pedophile gang rape. What about he what
his story gets ignored?
Or ignore BlackRock? Like, it's just so lazy.
There's so many honest people out there that
you know would call this out, but they're
afraid to be shouted down by the team.
Now the point I'm making is that they
clearly
made it look like they did not control
that much right before Elon took over. But,
again, maybe that changed. We don't know. What
I'm trying to highlight is that we don't
know. And right before it happened, they made
it look like they didn't own 70% of
what they had.
I think that's a pretty interesting point. And
overall,
we don't really know who's behind Elon Musk.
And I think BlackRock, if he's fund letting
them fund other companies, it's a pretty good
guess that that he would allow it elsewhere.
Because why would it make why is it
any different?
I think that's very important. But, you know,
it won't be addressed.
Now include the discussion we had back in
2020. I called it the COVID coup. The
BlackRock takeover of American interest. Now this was
Trump, by the way, that did this. Allowed
BlackRock to basically take over the US Treasury,
and this is not a secret.
We just don't talk about it. It's terrifying.
These people are pretending to fight the deep
state while they are working with the deep
state. While they're rolling out globalism and fighting
pretending to fight it.
Josh Walcos, Josh Tro Shane Panjoschi on Twitter
wrote this in 2023, the long shadow of
BlackRock. It's a good article.
Now in regard to BlackRock, as we're talking
about how obvious this all is, both on
potential Twitter connection, but the very obvious on
the record one around as Elon just said,
that BlackRock owns part of his XAI company.
Alex Jones in 2024
says, this takes thought police to a whole
new level. The UK is the laboratory for
BlackRock. Sponsored mind control.
Interesting. So right now, you got Elon and
and and Alex Jones screaming about what's going
on in the UK. He's telling you that
UK is the blabberatory for BlackRock manipulation.
And then he lets that same company invest
in the XAI company that is you that
is manipulating you on this platform that he's
already been clear about. So now you got
Israeli Zionist intelligence
and BlackRock using
what they're working on, Twitter and XAI.
Like, think about how wild that is. So,
I mean, if you if you took a
fraction of this and put it in front
of any Democrat, they would be screaming, and
rightly so.
You've got unit 8200 is really Telegis connected
Authentix, and their CHEQ is really bot company
bombing you through Twitter. You've got them working
through their XAI, which is using Twitter to
train their algorithm, which is being funded by
BlackRock in part. Or however much more we
don't see.
And now they're pointing at the UK and
it's going, that's the bad guy, but you're
telling us right before this that that was
BlackRock's
testing bed.
You start I mean, you don't think they
put these together, or are they suddenly now
just per choosing not to point it out
because it's too important not to? It says,
what is tested there is coming to your
nation next, as usual. Right?
Even though we can prove these connections to
Israel and Zionism and all the rest of
the things we talked about, but they won't
point out. It's all about creating the narrative
that it's
the boogeyman they choose to highlight in the
moment. Right now, it's gonna be Hamas or
Hezbollah
as Trump just literally pretend that Hezbollah was
at January 6th.
It's just so crazy. Now get another one.
This is
2024.
Now on 2,000,000 views.
It says 2 hits a year. BlackRock will
now loan them the money and rebuild and
will own them. That's called the Great Reset.
Great. So you're highlighting that BlackRock is part
of the Great Reset. Right? And he is
working with them on Twitter or XAI through
Twitter. Does that not worry anybody?
But why isn't he calling it out? If
BlackRock is the great reset, then why aren't
you calling out that connection?
Oh, I I know why. Because you're pandering
for Elon Musk. I'll show you next. But
this is about, this is about,
acapulco.
There it was a
what is it called? Anacapulco, the event.
So BlackRock, bad.
Only when it works when we want to.
Right? Well, Tessie, DC is pointing out BlackRock
is a very predatory corporation that it needs
and it needs a serious investigation
and a leash to protect all of the
victims from hurricane Helane, Milton, and victims of
Maui fires in Palestine. Okay. So she's believing
BlackRock is responsible for the fires, for the
hurricanes?
Question everything. How many are all included about
it? I wanna highlight how this conservative is
of the mind that these companies, or rather
BlackRock, is responsible for these things.
So if they're responsible for massive false flag
events or massive real events that kill people,
why would Elon Musk take their money?
But she is pointing that out right here.
But tags them, which I find interesting, and
she says, please protect these people from this.
So it's almost like she doesn't she's like
I mean, look. That shows Elon right there.
But it's almost like her post is like,
help us save Elon from these bad guys.
Like, that's hero worship for you.
Now, a wake up, Steve, Steve Poikkinen says,
Alex Jones is doing gay male ASMR and
calling it a talk show. Thought that was
funny.
But here's what he has to say. I
won't read you what came as writes out,
but this guy is
after what we just showed you. And I'll
play this clip about Elon Musk again after
this that that re that Reese, that was
form was formally from Infowars, put out. Well,
listen to what Alex Jones is right now
saying about Elon Musk. Despite what we just
showed you, despite all the contradictions, despite everything,
while ignoring the North American Union, ignoring BlackRock,
ignoring all the things that he was 30
seconds ago telling you is the biggest problem.
Life rafts and lifeboats when the Titanic sink.
The globalist, we're gonna take everything you got.
You suck. You need to die. Eat bugs.
Babies are bad. Families are bad. Give up.
Humanity sucks.
Elon Musk gotta fix things down here on
Earth instead of trying to go to Mars.
You know, all that crap.
And the the Wall Street Journal looking forward
to the end of humans and just all
of it.
So
everything I've wanted, everything I've pushed, everything I've
ever
said I knew we could do, because it
just historically made perfect sense,
is what Elon's doing.
Wow.
Guys, that was a wholehearted,
complete blanket endorsement.
Literally, he just said every single thing he's
ever wanted, Elon is doing.
Now realize, he's pointing to a Wall Street
Journal article about looking forward to the end
of humanity, which is not a new article.
And they're talking about exactly what Elon Musk
is doing. Read the article. They're talking about
the future of artificial intelligence, the future of
the where this is going, the transhumanist
direction. That's what they're doing.
I mean, it's not even a secret, guys.
Are we actually pretending like he doesn't know
that? That they're not working on robots and
great reset transhumanism and artificial intelligence and biological,
you know, biotech overlaps, mRNA injections, and the
great everything we've talked about.
You don't think he knows that? Like, guys,
and this is why he is having, like,
this massive unf like, whatever you wanna call
it. People are starting to freak out about
what they're they've invested their lives in this
guy, and they're now finally recognizing that this
is the moment of truth,
and he's just supporting it.
Now, look, you know, I've always been of
the mind this person is
I don't know. Not in your interest.
Maybe he doesn't realize. Maybe he's being played.
People seem to think he's been switched out
with some different body. It's, like, it's just
so crazy. I'm not I'm not joking. Look
at the comments. The point is they just
can't come to terms with the fact that
he's just not who he pretended to be.
That's what I think it is. I just
don't know how you could pretend, for example,
that you can't see their support like, that
Elon Musk's supporting Israel or RFK's supporting Israel.
That you can't you can't ignore what that
shows you. That's a choice. Now we don't
know why. Maybe they're threatened. Maybe their family's
being threatened. Maybe they're blackmailed. Maybe they're just
secret Zionists. They don't mean anything else they're
saying. The point is we don't know the
why, but we can see that doesn't make
sense.
So why he would ignore this? Why he
would point to these things as the thing
we're fighting while we could prove that's on
record what Elon Musk is talking about? The
merging of brain machines or the merging of
humans?
Do you not think that's exactly what looking
forward to the end of humanity is?
So just think about that, guys.
Question everything. Question what I'm saying. Don't blindly
follow anybody. It's you know, we are at
a time that the time of the ideologue
has passed.
We need to move beyond this absurdly childish
game where we look to somebody. They want
you to look to your betters. It's like
some archaic holdover from when we used to
actually have,
you know, whatever. Some kind of, well, I
guess we're technically still the monarchy in the
world today. But, you know, the the time
when there was the royal families and you're
supposed to look at your betters.
That's what this feels like. Some kind of
holdover from this idea that we're supposed to
constantly be looking to the the technocrats and
the people above us. Like, they know what's
better. Don't think for yourself
or they're lackeys that do their work for
them.
Because if humanity sucks,
Elon Musk gotta fix things down here on
Earth instead of trying to go to Mars.
You know, all that crap.
And the and the Wall Street Journal looking
forward to the end of humans
and just all of it.
So
everything I've wanted, everything I've pushed, everything I've
ever
said I knew we could do because it
just historically made perfect sense
Wow.
Is what Elon's doing.
And so
I am
fabulously pleased
to absolutely
salivate over what he's doing.
Wow. Because I tried to get Trump to
understand the death cult in the new world
order, and he's a really good guy and
wants prosperity and gets a lot of it.
And now he's a lot more hardcore and
now has Elon Musk advising him daily.
And so once Trump gets in, he will
probably when it comes to damaging the globalist
to more than Musk has. That's great. This
is not a competition.
I hope those 2 with all It's just
so funny. He feels boxed out. He feels
like he's not part of the club right
now.
Well, he's he's not they're they're they're the
thing. It's not it's not a competition. I
I could be there too. It's up if
they're doing their thing, very, very funny to
me. It's very it's very insecure. But nonetheless,
the point, guys,
everything he's doing
Absolutely
salivate over what he's doing. Gross.
Because I tried to get Trump to understand
the death cult and the new world order.
Right. So let's start step 1. Right? How
about the North American Union that you used
to call out? Funny how you've not even
mentioned that despite everybody throwing it in front
of you, and you know that. Right? Or
the idea of the any number of the
overlaps around like, the death cult, he keeps
calling it. Right? He I mean, they're so
lazily making that about just Democrats
and and and certain groups while ignoring those
groups when they overlap with your team.
It's just so clumsy, and I know everybody
honest can see it.
This
is him choosing to he's I mean, look.
If you want the obvi oh, it's the
way I titled the show today. These are
these are people who are, whether inadvertently or
not, pretending to fight the globalist while literally
rolling out the globalist plan. That's what we're
watching.
And maybe you think they're being played. That's
for you to decide.
But I think that's quite impossible based on
what we can see in front of us.
And he's a really good guy and wants
prosperity and gets a lot of it, and
now is a lot more hardcore, and now
has Elon Musk advising him daily.
And so once Trump gets in, he will
probably when it comes to damaging the globalist
too, more than Musk has. That's great. This
is not a competition.
I hope those 2 with all of you
just wrecked the new world order, and I'm
gonna say, hey, crew. You can run it
now. Owen and the crew, bye bye. I'm
gone. Yeah. Right. I would love to Right.
Like, he like, he's like he's always 4.
He has to do this because he's 5.
Like, I don't believe that for a second.
I believe it's important to him to maintain
his center of attention. Never be on air
again. Seriously.
I don't hate doing it, but it's so
fully
controlling me
that I want the release
of seeing my mission so successful
that you will never hear from me again.
That is my goal. So what's the mission
what's the mission that's successful? When when Elon
Musk rolls out his robots and his AI
systems
and his biometric scans,
artificial intelligence, like, that that that's what's about
to happen. That that's what you think is
your vision?
That's not what you're claiming. Like, how in
the world are you aiming at what you
think you're presenting and we can look and
go, Elon's over here literally showing you, literally
demonstrating where this is gonna go next, working
with Teal and Karp and all the rest
of these maniacs and Israel who's committing genocide
and using AI to train these things while
they kill children that's coming back to you
soon. Someone love to talk about us coming
home to roost. They're sure as hell not
talking about the most provable example of that.
But yeah. But apparently, that's all his vision
for this wonderful future that he checks out
of.
My goal is to hike in the mountains
every day.
My goal is to go out fishing in
the sea every day. My goal is to
have campfires on my family
and
to read history books and
play board games.
But I I know we'll never get to
that. The the the point is is that
that's where I'd like to go.
And
Alex Jones becoming obsolete because everybody else gets
it
is the goal. I've been telling you this
for 20 plus years. And, look, we're here.
Yeah. Of course. It's not that everyone's recognizing
you're a complete fraud. It's that I'm just
so well, I'm just I've done my job.
Everyone gets it now. So I'm just gonna
move aside. It's a very easy way to
exit stage left while being called out for
as an absolute fraudster working for the goal
list that you claim you were fighting the
entire time. But you guys can decide for
yourself.
Here is the person he's talking about, just
in case you forgot, coming from somebody who
was moments ago working with Infowars until he
came to understand what I think a lot
of people that have fled from that have
realized that they are not honest.
Culture has touted Elon Musk as some sort
of eccentric heavyweight genius
with humble beginnings,
but this is demonstrably false.
Elon Musk was born in South Africa where
he claims he grew up extremely poor, but
his family owned an emerald mine. As a
teenager,
Elon would trade emeralds for cash in New
York City, and his father bragged how they
had so much money we couldn't even close
our safe.
Musk claims to have had about a $100,000
of student loan debt,
but he received a full scholarship to the
University of Pennsylvania
where he bought a 10 bedroom frat house
with his friend Adeo Ressi and ran an
illegal nightclub.
The pop culture claim is that Elon has
an IQ of a 155,
but this has never been tested. And after
being accepted into Stanford for PhD studies, he
dropped out after 2 days.
After dropping out, Elon began his first business
venture with his brother Kimbal, Zip 2, which
was essentially a digital version of the yellow
pages.
The brothers received tens of 1,000 of dollars
from their parents, and yet Elon denies this.
An associate of Elon's father, Greg Curry, got
involved to bring in investors.
But Elon's code was no good, so they
had to hire on professional coders to rewrite
everything.
Zip 2 was then sold for $307,000,000
to Compaq, who later shut it down without
ever earning a profit.
Elon made $22,000,000,
bought a $1,000,000 McLaren f one supercar, which
made mainstream news
before he totaled the uninsured vehicle.
Musk then went on to create an online
bank, x.com.
He partnered with banking expert, Harris Fricker, Edward
Ho, and Christopher Paine.
All 3 ended up leaving the company after
accusing Elon of lying to the media about
the quality of their product.
Elon claims he founded PayPal.
Before the company was named PayPal, it was
known as Confinity.
It was founded in 1998 by Peter Thiel
and Max Levchin.
After losing 1,000,000 of dollars,
Elon's x.com
was bought by Confinity in a merger in
2,000.
All Musk contributed at Confinity
was his own power struggle. He made himself
CEO
and pushed to change the name to x.com.
The executive team successfully petitioned to fire Musk
while he was away on vacation.
Part of Musk's resignation agreement stipulated
that all references to founders of the company
will be removed from their website,
allowing Elon to claim credit, which so far
is all he has ever achieved.
Peter Thiel then rebranded the company as PayPal,
went public, and
sold to eBay for $1,500,000,000.
Elon made 180,000,000
from the deal, which he then invested into
Tesla,
SpaceX, and failed company SolarCity.
Elon falsely claims to be the founder of
Tesla.
Tesla was founded in 2003 by Marc Tarpenning
and Martin Eberhard, who developed the Tesla Roadster.
When Tesla Motors began looking for venture capital,
they approached Elon Musk, who had the fake
credibility as PayPal's cofounder.
Musk joined with the condition that he be
named chairman of the board.
In emails, Musk was upset that the media
was not giving him credit for Tesla Motors
and went after Martin Eberhard, replacing him as
CEO.
He then forced Eberhard out of the company
and rewrote the company's history to have himself
listed as an original cofounder.
Martin Eberhard, the man behind the Tesla Roadster,
was promised the 1st Roadster off the assembly
line, but Musk screwed him over on that
as well and sent that car into space.
You can tell it's real because it looks
so fake, honestly.
So who is Elon Musk?
Elon describes his father as being an evil
abusive man.
His father, Errol Musk, has been accused of
being a pedophile
and fathered a child with his stepdaughter, who
is 42 years younger than him.
This spoiled, narcissistic failure,
son of accused pedophile,
wants to put computer chips in everyone's brain,
so that we can merge with artificial intelligence.
His girlfriend is now bragging how this could
all lead to a communist utopia.
And strangely enough, former Nazi and head of
NASA, Wernher von Braun,
predicted a man named Elon would conquer Mars
in a 1952
novel that he wrote, which is odd because
NASA has partnered with Elon SpaceX to work
towards colonizing Mars.
Elon Musk, like everything else in today's modern
society,
is a fraud, a fake genius,
just like fake philanthropist Bill Gates
and his fake vaccines,
brought to you by the fake news.
Here's a pro tip for dealing with the
mainstream media and all of pop culture.
Assume it's a lie and research everything.
For infowars.com,
this is Greg Reese.
Well done.
I just really don't know how you can
ignore all that.
So
ending
and then then this is shared by Red
Pill USA. I just I looked it up
real quick on Twitter, but that is Greg
Reese that shared that. So make sure you
check out his work.
Also include this, I put this out to
be, like, the kind of, you know, the
I I hate I hasn't even called it
a joke, obviously, because both stories are horrifying.
But, you know, the way you play this,
what do you call it? When I come
out so everyone's talking about what's going on
with the fires and rightly so, it's a
horrifying story. But just trying to show some
constant some, you know, discernment to what, you
know, the
It's interesting to me that this these stories
take so much focus
when there's objectively
larger stories in the world. That's not meant
to diminish what's going on there. I mean,
I already got a negative response from that
I said the other the other show. It's
in. It's not. It's a horrifying reality. And
I I feel for those people, especially with
the government and everything that's happening after, like,
almost always. But, nonetheless, you can look at
these larger events in the world. Just go,
yeah. It's it's crazy that these things get
overtaken, usually with a bunch of fake stuff
on top of it too. So I simply
put this out saying, my god. Look at
the devastation caused by these fires in LA.
Almost looks like a bomb went off, or
maybe more than 1. I said, oh wait,
that's just actually the live broadcast genocide in
Gaza that motion power ignoring, so you're allowed
to ignore it. Carry on. I mean, you
know, because the image looks a lot like
something you might see over there, you know?
As people reacted to it, which I'm happy
to see.
But this is an important follow-up. I don't
know the name, it's just in in,
Arabic writing. But this guy's account shows a
a
a meme.
The top one says, Jebeliah camp, and it
shows it completely flattened. That's in Gaza.
20 +1000000000
of US tax dollars sent to do this.
20,000,000,000
plus. It's actually so much more than that.
Then he goes Pacific Palisades. $18,000,000
cut from firefighter budget.
Well, that's quite interesting.
Think about that though. Willing to send 1,000,000,000
upon 1,000,000,000, upon 1,000,000,000 to continue to murder
children.
But well, when we're talking about California here,
but talking about it from a federal perspective.
Right? That it cuts when things that matter
all over the place for you.
How is that America first when both Trump
and Biden are leaning into the same thing?
Very good question. Now I'll include this as
well for the North American Union point. If
you don't remember that, I mean, there here
it is on the sustainable development goals from
the United Nations, which they all call out.
Here it is for the post new world
order map showing you the your North American
Union. Right? And I think Oh, it was
the,
this one here. Hold on.
I'll just I'll just grab his account.
Decent of News put this out.
It's the Technate map, I'm sure you've seen
it.
And this is from, guess who? Elon Musk's
grandfather, Technocracy Inc.
But this is the Technate, the Technate of
America. Right? That was that's from the old
conversation of technocracy. And that is what they're
presenting as this new Greenland
Panama, you know, you know, annexing all these
territories. Okay?
You're not hearing a peep about this from
the people that would otherwise call it out
before all of this. That has to be
relevant to you. So my point is, as
Israel's globalist ambitions become clear, team sport Republicans
endorsed North American Union without calling it that.
Now back to the larger overarching point from
today. Right? Whether we're talking about literal kinetic
war and and occupation
or cultural manipulation
or,
regime changes. But it's the same comp it's
just extensions of the same globalist agenda. Overlap
with Zionism and technocracy. It's pretty obvious.
So the point is that we have to
see that the people that are currently standing
and screaming the loudest from the rooftops about
fighting globalism
in every part of the conversation are supporting
globalism.
I just think that's very obvious.
So talking about
a conversation in another aspect of this that
I think also has to do with this
partisan manipulation globalist conversation. Now this overlaps with
2 stories.
This one is specifically about North Carolina
and the lithium point that will relate with
the fire we're gonna talk about. That that
part of the conversation.
Let me close these real quick.
And this was a conversation we had on
October 3, 2024. Israel kills American
as indiscriminate strikes on Lebanon continue and North
North Carolina's lithium. And And that was the
point about just high highlighting that lithium conversation.
Albemarle was the company who, by the way,
works with Israel, who also was aqua it
was acquired by BlackRock. You know, all these
different points that mattered when it's not Elon,
apparently.
But it was interesting because it mattered. I
mean, lithium is a huge part of the
right earth's middle dynamic that has to do
with artificial intelligence and electronics and a lot
of this stuff.
So what it's worthy it's worth considering whether
it might have been engineered, whether this might
have been ignored so that more chaos happened
so it can maybe be but I don't
think it added up. So that you can
clearly show that Arbor Marrow Arbor Arbor Merrill
already had a contract. It was already happening.
This actually seemed to hinder what they were
doing. But it didn't matter because it wasn't
about the evidence. It was about just going,
this was there. Therefore, we know this, and
that that's the kind of game you get
from the partisan elements.
Meanwhile, if it actually had been part of
the story, just like I said, you never
would have seen accountability because of the way
they did that. Come and they say it's
important to think about.
Oh, here it is. Israel chemicals entering joint
venture with Al Albemarle US. Remember, that's a
company that works on literally making
white phosphorus for the US government. I find
that interesting. I don't even necessarily see that
connecting. I just think it's interesting.
But here,
in 28th December, 2024, we talk about the
continuing the conversation of the partisan implosion. But
we also in this discuss that conversation. It's
just not in the title.
BlackRock strategic acquisition of of Albemarle
2024.
Oh, that's what I already had. And then,
just to show you again, you know, so
the the epicenter of this location,
it was was quite literally and or it's
right here, excuse me. I was looking at
the point the wrong one. Is literally right
where this town is. Like, it's in the
spot. So if you were gonna talk about
the center and whether that was, you know,
aimed that way like the lithium conversation,
you would have also seen this.
I'm not gonna go through it all again,
but I just want you to think about
this because it's interesting as we're now seeing
the lithium come back up around the fire
conversation.
This was interesting. A tiny backwater town in
North Carolina will help fuel the world's AI
revolution. With what they're all rolling out and
with the large Republican pundits pulling all their
punches around what they would normally screw about,
it seems very strange to me that this
would not be the focus, the the focal
point, the focus. And this was this quartz
powder.
And it's Sabelco is investing 700,000,000 to expand
its 2 high purity quartz mines in North
Carolina. And if you read this, apparently,
the one place in the world
is this location that has this high fine
quality quartz sand
that is needed for all of this stuff.
It's wildly and and and the interesting part
about this is you could see that what
it's done to the town. That I mean,
I don't wanna go through the story again.
We talk about it in the one I
just showed you.
That was the the article I was just
showing you, the make merry great again with
all your stuff.
What's interesting about it
is that like the rest of them, it
is also clearly
I I think it's about more than just
this. It's about the way they're taking over
these towns.
Yeah. Is that, you know, just
like like we talked about, like, in that's
that was actually this conversation. In this town,
after they basically continue to just take over
the town and people are losing all of
their shops. They don't have any industry. People
are leaving. And despite design, I think.
Get Microsoft and Apple and Google all start
massive centers right in this town.
You think that's by coincidence? Like, this is
a central point for the world's change to
artificial intelligence. And that doesn't get highlighted as
maybe they wanted to further destroy this town
to change that. Like, of all the two
points, this one makes far more sense than
the other one.
But they didn't talk about it. I think
because, obviously,
the people who are clearly invested in artificial
intelligence right now. You know, their savior, their
gospel, their ideologues.
Pretty interesting, isn't it?
So now, we've got this, you know, I've
seen this guy share a lot of stuff.
A lot of which I've later seen not
be the case.
And it says, breaking lithium plant just discovered
by Los Angeles fire officials.
Just discovered?
Like, we don't I mean, it's a funny
it's a kind of a silly way to
frame that. But either way and he goes,
and there it is.
And there's your partisan assumption. Right? Oh, it's
a lithium plant, which by the way exists
a lot of places.
He goes, there it is. Maui 2.0. Another
land grab. Don't second guess what this is
about. So he's just telling you, blindly assume
in the interest of what we think this
may be. And even if it turns out
to be that, that's still a stupid thing
to do.
Don't think don't second guess what it's all
been about. Just lurch into it must be
lithium, must be the great reset despite how
that does connect with all the people you
think you're supporting.
Hey. This partisan game is losing con it's
they have lost the plot. But it's getting
almost a 1000000 shares. That's how it's working
on this platform right now. What's hey. Free
speech. Do what you want. But I think
that's not honest. I think that's being done
by people like the Elon controllers acting like
free speech is happening.
Of course, into the narrative, same thing. Breaking
out, same thing. Anyway, old story. The point
is that this is about trying to make
this case. Now, yes, it could be. Lithium
is important to this. But is there proof
that one, we and like, we already said
there's not that that this spot this was
in in
a manufactured thing and not just malfeasance that
caused it? Well, no. We haven't.
And that may bother you, but you go
you're we know it because you just don't
wanna admit it is not is not even
evidence. That's just your opinion. But that's what
you get when you make this conversation to
them online.
Here is
So so it changes see this was funny.
Oh, my God. Okay. Just hold on.
I just forgot. I just these things there's
so many of the things when you're organizing.
So
this guy
is confusing
lithium battery storage with a lithium plant.
And that just kinda goes to that just
speaks to the nature of what we're dealing
with here. Here's what the guy is saying
in the video.
Where is it?
There it is.
With the hazmat, we have found a underground
lithium battery storage plant for bicycle batteries
that has posed a huge hazard in that
area.
We are working with the hazmat teams to
keep that contained. So a lot of that
is just very dangerous. As you just heard,
the air quality in some of that area
is still very very high and dangerous.
Oh, my god, man. I mean, you see
what we're dealing with, guys?
How embarrassing.
And a lithium plant just discovered.
Guys, he's got, like, a 1000000 views on
this.
I mean, he it's it's his video where
the guy said, hey, look. Yes. Another land
grab for lithium.
I mean, if you can't see by now
how completely
look. I I wanna be clear. I do
not think this is the majority of either
part of either side.
I think there's a lot more discerning people
out there and we pretend, but they just
keep falling in. They fall into these partisan
traps. But far too many people are being
Twitter filed right now, where it becomes this
guy said the thing. Oh, it's a video
that I'm not gonna watch because I like
this guy, and I'm he probably
lithium batteries for bicycles are not a lithium
plant.
My god.
I'm just looking really quickly to see if
anybody, anywhere, is land grab, land grab, classic,
land grab, elites, land grab. Because that's the
kind of following you develop when you basically
put out b s all the time.
I can't believe that.
But that's what we get. So anyway, the
point is lithium. It has to be lithium.
Well, the the interesting part about this is
that that is such a bottom line is
that that exists in other places. And yes,
that could be a factor. But this jump
into it is because it's interesting because people
go like Lahaina, like Maui. That's a story.
It becomes entertaining. It becomes the reality show
again. Everybody jumps right back into it. Now
we're on Maui Doo. Oh, here we go.
Where's the evidence?
Right?
Well, he got he's got a lot of
big yellow signs, so it's got I he
well, I guess there's no oh, I responded.
Check this out. I did that was that
there just now?
Did that just pop up? How funny is
that? I'm pretty sure we scrolled down. I
wasn't there. Reader so this might've just tell
me if I'm wrong, but I think this
might've just popped up. The video from the
fire official clearly states this is not a
mine, but an underground lithium. God, how embarrassing.
Yeah. Just for a I'm gonna I'm gonna
make a point about this later.
Because these guys are these, you know, almost
a 100000 followers.
It's very sad what's happening, and these are
the people that are being leaned into by
larger accounts. Now, on top of all of
this, as we just showed you yesterday or
gave before yesterday, Jesse Waters
calling for a full federal takeover of Los
Angeles with maybe martial law.
Think about how crazy that is. While we're
talking about land grabs, we're talking about
the great reset.
Now I'm not talking about, like, foreign policy
here. These are Americans talking about
land grabs for the great reset. That's what
that's what Jones is screaming about. And you
have people on Fox News literally calling for
full federal takeover of an area, and they
don't call that part of it?
I mean, that's just about that's just stupid.
I mean, my guy I don't look. I
know people even in this conversation, even conservatives,
will call him a rhino. But you still
don't see the larger accounts going
on most well, he's probably just joking, which
is what I got from some people. Well,
here he is.
This is biblical level destruction, and the city
of LA is hosting the Olympics in 4
years.
There's no way we can showcase LA to
the world.
A full federal takeover is needed. Invoke the
Stafford Act. Oh, the Stafford Act like Donald
Trump did in 2020.
That's that's production martial law, guys. That's what
that is. And now but he takes it
even further to just full martial law. State's
overwhelmed.
Martial law might have to be declared.
Look. If you're actually pretending like he's joking
at all, you're you are a partisan liar.
K? He is straight up calling for martial
law,
calling for a federal takeover of a state.
I it's just so shocking to me that
the people who were the most ramped up
about fighting all this stuff are the ones
that seem to be rolling this out right
now.
Everything about this is everything that at least
objective non partisan people were this is where
we all saw it going. Now you will
and you guys just
again, please hear me when I go on
these rants. I'm not talking about the majority
of people because I do not believe that.
But I'm just so disgusted by the people
who are out there acting like, you know,
like the rest of Elons and the rest.
Acting like they're saving you while they are
the ones building a prison around you.
It's scary, guys. I mean, it's wild to
see that. And people are acting like this
makes sense. If not act it's maybe a
troll. Maybe he's kidding. But then kind of
like, yes, let's do it though. Unless we're
supposed to pretend like it's a troll. So
let me know. Give me the cue. Are
we kidding? Are we going with it? You
know, that's how this keeps going.
Martial law.
If this was a democrat or CNN, you
guys would be losing your minds.
Here,
Sam Tripoli pointed out just going, oh my
god, they're saying it out loud now. You
know, some people are still able to see
it. And don't forget John Cohen, right after
that is going, well, here, look, martial law.
It's already happening. Like, so maybe that was
all by design.
Literally got the military rolled out for the
fire,
which is becoming normalized. You know what else
is becoming normalized? States of emergency because, oh
my god, there's a weather thing coming. Hasn't
even happened yet. And we're declaring a state
of emergency just in case there's weather.
I mean, it's just
and it seems lots of largely republicans are
all all ramped up about how they're gonna
lie about some new weather event.
The bottom line is very clearly
that is normalizing
more government control over everyday events in your
life like this.
But and that's both sides doing it to
you. Now last point on this fire this
is just fascinating to me. So you're gonna
see, like we saw with god Zayed or
whatever his name is, in regard to the
racial stoking, it's the same thing. Every time
they can, they're in there fanning the flames
of whatever keeps America fighting itself. And if
you think that's not what's happening, you've gotta
do some research on Netanyahu's leaked videos of
him literally saying that. That how easy it
is to divide this country for their benefit.
More than one video I've shown you on
this show. So what you get is things
like this.
Somebody faked this. It's a deep fake. And
quite frankly, it's very obvious because at the
end, she speaks with, like, a British accent.
But the point is this is supposed to
be Taylor Swift
saying
that this is god's retribution
on America.
Why? Because because of what's happening in Israel.
Right? So, basically, they're killing over there, so
god's punishing America. And they want this to
be, here's what the Democrats think.
We support terrorism and want and want America
to be punished. They're trying to make this
out to be some Middle East versus America
thing, guys, and they faked it
like they do every time.
Watch this.
Burns Gaza for a year and a half
with missiles funded by American taxpayers,
only for God's punishment to strike the US
in just 2 days. For over a year
and a half, Gaza has endured relentless bombing
by missiles financed
through the taxes paid by American citizens.
This brutal assault has caused immense suffering for
Gaza's residents and left its infrastructure in ruins,
while the world remained largely silent. However, in
just 2 days, divine retribution
struck the United States as a natural disaster
consumed an area larger than Gaza itself. This
event raises profound questions about justice
and the consequences of supporting oppression.
It's so obviously fake, not only because it
sounds British at the end, but it's also,
like, robotic at certain parts. But people fell
for it. So what's interesting about this is
we're all being dumbed down in Twitter filed.
That's what happens. People fall for the most
in ridiculous nonsense.
But what's interesting about it is clearly well,
1, the whole deep fake. Am I are
you noticing? This is even though they're like,
the Trump one. What about Greenland? It was
very fake. It's starting to rule out more.
And it's coming from like, it's not like
some guy going, I did this and it's
funny. Where it come from? It's very interesting.
I'm telling you that we're gonna see these
things come, and you all know that. It's
weird that it hasn't happened yet. But here,
I think it's very clear what this is
supposed to do. This is supposed to make
Republicans outraged at Democrats because they think they're
siding with terrorists because of bad America.
It's lazy, and it's actually not even remotely
what's happening in the conversation. There are people
out there that definitely recognize the US government
is the problem
very clearly.
But to pretend that means they hate everybody
in this country is the same game they
play when they say Iranians wanna kill you
for your freedom. And I no. They are
very clearly saying, we see your government's the
problem. And same thing with Zionism. Even Hamas
changed their charter to say Zionism.
Yes. They could be lying, but it's weird
how everyone is consistently going in the same
direction that we all recognize the problem here,
But they really want you to buy this.
Here's another example. Same thing. So this is
why I see this happening because this is
not some accident. Okay? You'll find 15 examples
of this. And people sharing the same things.
Hamas atrocities,
one of these classic accounts that has, what,
a 125,000
followers now, despite them everything they do being
a lie, like, constantly lying. It's a this
is the atrocity propaganda platform. That's what this
is. They come out and say, Palestinians and
their fans are celebrating Los Angeles fires.
Yep. They're happy. So they're a seconding thread,
and it says, we start with this example,
which god if god burns America. Well, of
course, screenshot.
Screenshot.
Screenshot. Weird. Because you know what? If you
actually look into these, you'll find most of
them aren't even remotely what they seem. On
this case, I don't even know if this
person the bottom line is to frame this
as all Palestinians and their fans are celebrating
the fire. First of all, this says, well,
Israel burns Gaza. God burns America.
Now I don't know her intentions or where
she supports or whether she thinks that's why
it's happening, but it does not mean
what they're trying to make it out to
be.
This, the this point here, this sir Chilebean
says Los Angeles sent 50,000,000 in taxpayer money
to Israel while cutting 17 in the that's
just a fact. And no way does that
mean he's going, yay. You heard everybody in
America.
They're just so desperate to turn us against
ourselves, and they'll tell you that if you
listen.
The bottom line though, just like this fake
Taylor Swift video, they want you to think
that Americans are going, yay. I I'm look.
I guarantee there's somebody out there.
My point is that if you look into
the ones they're pointing to, that's just not
what they're saying. But this is how it
works.
Now last point on this.
We just saw how
they're talking about, Biden was saying a 100%
of the cost, which I I doubt actually
happens. But, nonetheless, just him saying that while
barely helping people in North Carolina is disgusting.
Now it's hard not to see a a
partisan overlap. Maybe that's what happened. I just
I don't I rarely think that's what drives
it, but you could be right. Maybe it's
because of they want to make that statement.
Maybe because Biden thinks that.
Either way, it's important to highlight that of
that contradiction, that,
discrepancy. It's crazy.
But so now what I wanna highlight is
that as Biden says that,
here's what the house Republicans swing back in
and do. I just want you to see
the guys that if you're in this game
of pretending one side versus the other, it's
just it's this they they are either just
as bad at each other or the same
thing. Because they just do the same BS
back and forth. So here they come in
and it says, House Republicans threatened to withhold
disaster aid from California amid the fires.
Quote, if they want the money, then there
should be consequences where they have to change
their policies.
Now obviously, you could argue that that and
I'll just read the next one. It goes,
and later he added, I mean, we support
the people that are plagued by disaster, after
he's been asked, but we have to put
pressure on California government to change course. Okay.
So that does not sound like he means
give them what they need to help. But
get promises, assurances from new California,
and then we'll send the need, the help.
Now, obviously, some of this is maybe just
what the government may need.
But some of that is they're talking about
disaster relief. That goes to people too.
So as you have them criticizing the Biden
administration not giving relief to North Carolina, you
have them at least threatening
to do something similar
because the government. What does that have to
do with the suffering people? It's the same
stupid dynamic. Guys, it's the woke white woke
right, woke left. It's the same different thing.
Same objective.
Now what again, maybe the we'll wait and
see. If this comes to pass and they
you know, maybe it's different. But I just
just the conversation is enough to point out.
It says right wing media figures have recently
pushed misleading claims that California's bad forest management
is to blame for the fires while ignoring
how climate change impacts measures to prevent the
spread of fires. Media matters, America reported. Just
wanna show you how they're framing it. Right?
That's a right wing left that's that's their
milk bread and butter.
To me, it's it's not about left and
right. It's about how partisanship lies for their
agenda, for the government manipulators.
And at the end of the day, what
we can see
is the same action.
And, you know, lesser I mean, let me
put it this way. Right now, a very
less very much lesser degree because it hasn't
really happened yet. If it comes to pass
where they do withhold this because California refused
to change, well, that'll be the same thing.
Maybe even worse. But either way, the fact
that they even threaten this while people are
suffering shows you that they don't care about
them, guys. Even if they were, oh, oh,
what? Like, secondarily, we care about them. We
just wanna deal with them first. No. Then
you don't care about them.
Now,
ends in foreign policy points. Reasonably,
you know, not, like, in 10 minutes, but
reasonably quickly to go through this, I think
I wanna just highlight some of these foreign
policy points.
Wait a minute. Actually, I wanna pull that
aside.
I couldn't find this for a second. I
wanna remember this quartz conversation.
But,
actually, I'm sorry. Hold on.
I did wanna I gotta follow-up on this.
This is just this guy needs to be
called out more for this, but
so on support policy news, starting with some
kind of other right now, again, still the
same larger objective point here.
The idea of where this all goes, the
all these interconnected points.
This is just a, antiwar.com article just showing
you something that I've talked about a lot.
CIA director reiterates,
there's no evidence Iran has decided to build
a nuclear bomb.
I just
don't know how many times we could disregard
from everybody
other than Netanyahu
and and politicians that support him.
The the International Atomic Energy Agency,
the outgoing CIA director,
They're not seeking nuclear weapon. Everything they're saying
is about I mean, of course, they could
be lying to you, but realize that the
evidence they present to claim they are is
almost I mean, no. I
every time has been debunked. I was gonna
reference one other exam. The point is the
discs they presented, the fake documents they put
on the tape, every time they've come back
to be shown to be inaccurate or false
or not even remotely connected.
And yet, they keep pushing it. He comes
out with his stupid Wile E. Coyote bomb
and fills it up with a red red
marker. Oh my god. And yet, they tell
you they're not doing that. How much you
wanna bet, Vance and Musk, and Elon, or
and and Trump are going to push the
same narrative?
Because they already made that clear.
Mark my
words. It's good. This is what in Netanyahu
is already positioning itself for.
On the point of Greenland and the North
American Union that Alice Jones is ignoring,
Vance just came out and just as usual,
they tend to give you some of it.
And admitted that, yes, it is partly about
natural resources, which we all actually know.
During Greenland, I think there actually is a
real opportunity here for us to take leadership,
to protect America's security, to ensure that those
incredible natural resources are developed, and that's what
Donald Trump is is is good at. He's
good at making deals, and I think there's
a deal to be made in Greenland. Oh,
I thought it was about freedom. I thought
the Greenland people wanted to join us, and
that's all it was really about,
Freeing them from their constraints. Oh, but we'll
also take take your resources, you know, because
that's how
it's come on. Are we that stupid?
It's it's fully transparent what's really going on.
They just know they can tap into your
ideological points, most of which the team's work
circle doesn't even care about. But they'll scream
about it and then trick other people.
Easy. Now, here's the article again about the
North American Union.
It's very obvious. They know what they're ignoring.
They know what they're building.
And here again, Charlie Kirk, of course, because
he knows. Highlighting some random poll, which who
knows where that comes from, or it's just
written out on something, or actually he does
post it down here.
I mean, we can though.
It says here's the real difference between Danish
and Greenlandic views on the future.
It says, while Danish politicians would like to
tell how Greenland will experience a dramatic drop
in welfare, according to new poll, 32% of
Greenland population is convinced that detachment
will benefit the Greenlandic economy.
Well, that says 32%.
This says, first documents
the study conducted.
First documents that 67.7
percent of all living in Greenland want Greenland
to become an independent state. So here's how
he's playing you on this, guys. That's what
it says in the actual tweet, but I
just wanna read it for you.
Greenland poll independence
from Denmark
does not mean joining another
state.
It means independence.
I mean, it's just ridiculous. But the they
frame it as, well, we're the liberating independent
state. No. You're not. You're a controlling
technocracy. I mean, it's just ridiculous to pretend
that you taking Greenland is them being independent.
But that Charlie Kirkland's greenland wants independence from
Denmark. He didn't say it. He says what
the poll says.
And then he goes, if people of Greenland
want their territory to join America, we should
accept them. Now that's what he's saying on
top of all this. Realize in every other
part of this, they've already told you they're
gonna do this. Trump said military force.
That's not a secret.
And this one is oh, there's actually a
oh, I didn't grab it. Hold on. I've
got it right over here.
I don't I mean, I I don't think
I'm gonna play it. I just wanted to
show it to you, include it in the
show notes. But the other clip, wherever that
is,
of Trump
saying military force. Was it was it, Greenland
and Panama?
And then what that clip is about is
using economic force regarding Canada.
Where was that?
Here it is.
How many I don't have it up here?
Well, I'll I'll try to find it, include
the show notes. We we went over in
the last show. As you guys have all
very well seen, and maybe maybe it is.
Nah. It doesn't say in there. So just
economic force. But the point is you guys
have all seen, you can look it up
in a 1,000 different articles, is him talking
about using military force for Greenland.
So how in the world does that line
up with the idea that they wanna be
independent?
And Vance talking about resources. They don't want
to be part of the United States. That's
already been shown in these conversations. Not Greenland,
not the government, none of it.
So the point on all of that, guys,
is this is continued expansion,
imperialism,
colonialism, like, however you wanna frame it. They're
all elements. They all intersect with way globalism
is rolling out.
Now in regard to the foreign policy element
elsewhere,
talking about Syria for a minute because that's
an obvious part of how Israel is expanding
right now.
Aaron Mate makes a good point because we're
gonna talk about more than just the,
this point's about Ukraine. We're gonna talk about
Syria and the same elements doing the same
thing. But don't forget that in Ukraine,
the same point we made before.
That these people were, as he writes be
the Guardian in 2018,
neo Nazi groups recruit Britons to fight Ukraine.
Like we keep telling you. Right? Nazis. Nazis.
Nazis. And then on a dime, suddenly,
Ukraine's highest profile combat unit to recruit English
speaking soldiers.
They just changed narratives. They know you saw
that. They just they don't care. And he
goes because Azov is on the front lines
of the Ukraine proxy war, they're no longer
Nazis. So my point in showing you that
is it's the exact same thing that happened
in Syria.
I know you all know that, most of
you watching, but in case you didn't know
that, the reality is that Syria, Hayatir al
Sham, the terrorist group that's currently in power,
was an open terrorist group that the US
pretended to fight.
They had a new $10,000,000 bounty. All of
this. Now all of a sudden, they just
go, never mind. Now they're the leaders. Now
they're in control because he put on a
suit.
How do you not see that as just
clumsy?
They don't care what you think. Clearly, they're
ready to roll out something entirely new. This
feels like the the last droppings of whatever
they're trying to roll out to keep you
distracted.
But here is Jeffrey Sachs speaking about this
with Tucker Carlson. You know, now that it
no longer matters in the context of stopping
it, typical mainstream alternative media steam release.
Let mean, just think how frustrating it is
that, you know, now is this now he's
had so somewhat this conversation, but think about
how frustrating it is. They're talking about Obama.
Like, the question is Obama or the CIA
overthrow Assad. And he goes, but why would
he wanna do that? So are we really
ever pretending like this is a new conversation?
Now I'm not saying, you know, yes, an
interviewer can coax out questions, but realize the
way it's being framed, the reason it's being
had now is because it's important to make
Tucker, in my opinion, look like he's got
more clout.
To say, look. I'm though I'm calling out
this truth with well, yes. So were a
lot of us back when it might have
been stopped. Back when we could actually stop
Israel and the US government that you support
from doing that.
Not just one side of it either. But
here's what Sachs had to say about this
because it's true. They did do this, and
it wasn't just the CIA.
Happened was the US got bogged down in
Iraq. There was the insurgency.
We didn't move
onward to to the next war, which was
to be Syria, which was to happen already
20 years ago.
But in 2011,
what really brought Assad down last week started
under Obama.
And, yes, and,
this is also interesting. And,
this is also started under Obama.
And, yes, and
See, I I wasn't sure if you could
see it or not. The point is that
so, you know, the way Tucker responds right
there,
you know, like like, really?
I, you know, that's not what you so
you you I sometimes will ask questions that
people might that seems as if I don't
know, but it's really about trying to get
them to come to a certain point in
the interview. Right? Where you try to get
them to come to that conclusion or connect
certain dots or just, you know, you want
their thought on how that comes together. My
point though is that this doesn't seem that's
not that he's acting surprised about that. Are
you really of the mind that he doesn't
know Obama did that? Really?
I mean, I I think we can prove
that's not true. So why what what's the
acting for?
This is also interesting.
It doesn't really matter who's president. This is
long term
deep
state policy.
Obama ordered the CIA
to overthrow
Assad. And Trump very much continued that guys,
and so did Biden, and so will Trump
again.
And
maybe not it's it's obviously serious change. I'm
talking about wherever this rolls out.
If you can't see the con the continuity
there, you don't want to. I mean, he
literally is Trump almost made this easier for
them by just rolling in. Just we're taking
the oil. We're taking the wheat.
He didn't even try to deviate from that.
So that started in 2011. But why would
Obama wanna overthrow Assad? Because See my point
like that? Like, that does not strike me
as somebody that is, like, just try
you get it. Same point. I I don't
know how you can't see that. Because
Israel has run it. The reason he's laughing.
Right? I mean, it's somewhat because you know
what I get the sense of is Sachs
knows this. He knows, like, he when Pierce
Morgan, he almost, like, laughs it off. Like,
really? Are you actually asking me that? Good
because Israel controls foreign policy. Like like, you
should stupidly know this by now. That's the
that's how you I feel like he's just
so tired. It's I mean, he's been on
the rounds. Right? But I just love his
response because it's like, really, guys? Come on.
Let's stop, you know, pee floating around this
whole thing. Let's just be real about it.
God. Because
Israel has run American foreign policy
in the Middle East for 30 years. Mhmm.
That's how it works.
We have an Israel lobby. We have,
this,
clear You mean the same thing Thomas Massie
walked it out for him. Laid it out
in clear technical yeah. But he's really? Why
we wanna do that?
Don't you think he would have already put
it together?
Break strategy. We have a plan for
7 wars in 5 years.
And what's interesting is they actually
kind of carry out this madness. They don't
explain any of it to the American people.
They don't, tell anybody, but you can watch
step by step.
We've had 6 of those 7 wars.
Yep.
Now, Aaron Motzey adds to this. Right? So
add now that we've seen Syria overtaken by
the very groups that the US and Israel
have always been trying to accomplish,
Washington Post headline, international sanctions left have left
Syria's health system on life support.
Now he says, now that Assad has been
ousted,
the establishment media outlets can acknowledge
the same thing that we've all been screening
for decades, whether in Syria or elsewhere. That
US sanctions
decimated
Syrian society,
including the health system, by design, I would
add.
And I don't mean that unique to them.
That's what they do. Sanctions like this are
designed
to make average people suffer. They I mean,
the thing the you can look back to
the before the Internet times where these were
they wrote these things out. The Kissingers of
the world openly talked about how they did
this.
And now they just it's like, you know,
the Department of War becomes the Department of
State. Now they have to make it sound
different.
Bottom line is,
he says, what the post misleadingly calls international.
Now that they can call it this, now
they can act like because at the time,
it was
inconvenient for them.
International sanctions.
What about the sanctions in Iran right now?
What about the sanctions on on Yemen? What
about the same that's the same thing. They've
been starving Yemen for 30 years, it seems.
It's incredible
that we can't piece this together and recognize
that what they've always been doing is trying
to starve these people to give up what
they to allow them to take from them
what they will.
These are the villains, guys.
Now Israel openly telling you they're planning long
term occupation of Syria.
That's the shocking. I know. We're all aghast
about it. Come on. It's the most obvious
thing in the world.
They were always planning to do this, and
they're using their terrorist groups to control it.
Terrorist groups. That they'll tell you hate Jewish
people, and they're working together to control Syria
because that makes sense. It only makes sense
when you recognize that all of the rest
of what they're telling you are lies. These
people are playing you, and your current administration
are lapping it up.
Lastly, on this point,
Ahmed Al Masur, an Egyptian national who was
in Hayatir al Sham, Al Qaeda, that's the
group running in Syria, has formed a new
Islamist movement with the stated goal of toppling
Egypt's president, Sisi,
following the fall of Assad in Syria. Now,
whether that's the plan, maybe they got tired
of Sisi.
Right? Or is my favorite dictator Trump famously
said? But maybe he's just not pulling the
punches anymore. That's just how this works, so
I need somebody new. Either way, it could
be that they this is how frivolous they
are with their own allies
or just another example of how they fund
the worst elements in the world and those
elements go out and do what they want.
And then they dev fallout and then they
use that to justify their next action. Either
way, these are terrorist organizations that they've empowered
in Syria who are threatening a a another
location, an ally of the United States, an
ally of of even Israel, though at least
the government.
It says Egypt is the largest Arab country
with more than a 100,000,000 people. Any development
there has enormous implications for the entire region.
I'm sure no one's gonna care about this
because it's their group. And either they'll ignore
it because it makes them look bad, or
they want it to happen so they won't
tell you about it.
Freedom. Democracy.
Here's your here's your
Israeli US funded freedom fighters, guys.
You know, the same kind of thing they
show you when they want you to freak
out with the people that they're
like, I mean, I I'm just it's so
constant
that they'll dress up like these. I mean,
the the classic thing we've shown you is
the history shows that Zionism is the foundation
for all of what you're looking at here.
It's hard for some people to wrap their
minds around that.
Now, in regard to
the walking back of some of these promises,
like with Israel, which we already know, he
has been very clear he's going to continue
the war. He is going to stop aid,
which may change by the we'll see. That's
why I'm waiting for that. But he has
said that, so you can't deny them saying
that will happen. Trump threatens to cut USA
to Ukraine quickly
if reelected, he said on June 16th.
Quickly,
right away, day 1, we keep hearing all
these statements. Right? Typical politicians. I never believed
them. But I'm simply making the point for
those that did because they thought he was
different.
Financial Times then on the,
this was December 2024,
is when he first shifted.
US president elect's closest foreign policy aids have
indicated that he will continue arming Ukraine while
pursuing an end of the war. Now and
he also backed that up.
Then, of course, in January,
Donald Trump backtracks on pledge to end Ukraine
war in 24 hours, a special envoy says
100 day timeline. Okay. Now well, you know,
give us a few months to figure it
out. Okay. Okay. I'm exactly my point, guys.
Maybe you just now go, well, the what
do you expect? Like, he could just snap
his fingers? Yeah. Guess what? That's what we
were saying when you shouted us down when
he first brought it up. Funny how things
shift along. Right? Then all of a sudden,
it doesn't go the way you screamed at
us that it would, and then you spout
back our logic.
Funny.
The bottom line is this is how it
always goes. Probably from here, it goes on
to never ending because that's how that goes.
But as we said from day 1, I
never argued why. I simply said it probably
won't go that way because we see the
agendas, and here we are.
And the next one, this is January 9th
of 2025.
US government, so currently Biden's administration, pledges $500,000,000
more in aid. Now, fit understand. I don't
that's not going immediately.
They're pledging that money, which Trump could then
walk back.
Or maybe they try to send some of
them, maybe try to rush it all through.
But it says in aid to Ukraine as
Zelensky seeks Trump's continued support. Here's what I
think is important to understand.
Trump and Biden just met at the White
House
to discuss dealing with Ukraine.
So if you think for one second that
Trump's unaware of this as he's openly telling
you he's going to keep funding Ukraine, you're
lying to yourself. So what I think this
is doing remember, my perspective, which I think
is quite obvious, but it is my opinion,
that it's all one entity. That they're working
together for the larger agenda when it matters.
So in this case, what you're doing is
giving him an out. So Trump can go
forward saying, I didn't do that. It was
Biden. And I'm my hands are bound even
though though they could stop it.
But I'm I'm just theorizing. We'll see how
it plays out. Either way,
Biden is continuing the funding. Trump party said
he would. And this is a way to
at least give them a long spot, not
100 year 100 day period where they can
continue to be funded while they pretend like
they might not. And then quietly eventually do
when they massively point over here and quietly
do that like they do every single time.
And on top of that, to make it
even more obvious, as of yesterday,
Trump administration will ask Ukraine to lower conscription
age, says Mike Waltz.
Yep.
President-elect Donald Trump's incoming national security adviser, representative
Mike Waltz, said Sunday that the Trump administration
will ask Ukraine to lower its age of
conscription.
Right? So we can send more children to
the front lines because freedom. Right?
Wasn't was it the Trump administration that was
openly talking about the meat grinder? To the
point about how people were dying and there's
so many young kids going to war, and
now that we have power, we're gonna do
the same damn thing and call it something
different.
And all the team support politics will flush
to support it and say, you don't know.
That's not the same thing. Now they wanna
do it.
I hope I'm wrong, but it's usually how
dumb it goes. Either way,
how do you not see it by now?
We're gonna lower the age for them to
go to war for the thing we just
swore we would stop on day 1.
My god.
In regard to Venezuela, you might have seen
this. First point, by the way, is the
fact that Elon Musk still continues to support
and share from visregard 24 despite
relentlessly being used to be to to launder
lies.
I mean, from for actually the last time
the one of the most important ones was
Venezuela, where he shared a tweet from them
that claimed they were stealing ballots. Turned out
to be a different time and not even
ballots.
He didn't care. He goes, I don't think
they're having interest in this is about manufacturing
a narrative and lying to do so. So
Visigrad says, Maduro just kidnapped opposition leader Maria
Corino
Corina Machado.
By the way, somebody who has been actively
destabilizing,
manipulating. We've talked about this. Trying to undermine
you working with the US government and Israel
to unto regime change their government. Can you
imagine what the US would do? Even a
floated idea about that in this country? Can
you imagine if there was a Chinese man
that was accused of doing any of that?
I mean, you know damn well what they
would do without any evidence, mind you. But
it says she's been hiding for months, and
Elon Musk goes exclamation mark.
Right. Gets it.
58,000,000
views.
Just by an exclamation mark. Think about that.
Now, by the way, before that,
it got 60,000,000 views. Because this account has
already
been propped up by Elon Musk for 1,200,000
followers, despite being one of the most egregious
misinformers on this platform.
That's not even my opinion. It is, but
it's not my only only my opinion.
There's
a lot of evidence coming from groups that
are even borderline supporting Israel.
Here,
Scott Ritter follows up and says, you mean
arrested.
There's a reason she was hiding,
and it's related to CIA money.
Now there's plenty of times where Scott, you
know, overlaps. And I think it's from like
an honest hope that Trump might be the
right direction, which I don't agree with. But
nonetheless, my point is highlighting that that
and often sometimes you see the alignment, my
point. But here, Scott Ritter's going, you're wrong.
You know, she wasn't arrested.
She Or she wasn't she wasn't,
kidnapped. She was arrested because she's working with
the CIA to overthrow the government. Guys, it's
very simple. Now, you should question that. Look
at the evidence. And once you do, you'll
find out it's pretty easy to see. But
question it, come to your own conclusions about
it.
Now here,
Alan McLeod
says alert, the United States is literally offering
a bounty for the head of a foreign
leader.
The US government announces a $25,000,000
reward for the arrest of Maduro.
I used I mean, really? Think about that.
While they're supporting terrorists in Syria,
while they're supporting illegals, regime change puppets all
over the world, while they're supporting people like
Hadi, who is a fake president of Yemen
who's in Saudi Arabia, or at least he
recently was, or supporting people like Netanyahu committing
genocide. But this guy
who the worst things they can say about
him are mostly things they've made up. That's
not to say he's the good guy you
wanted to be. I don't know. I don't
trust any government. But I can prove they've
lied about him in so many ways. Abby
Martin has done amazing work breaking this down
over the years.
That's what they go after? Calling him a
narco trafficker while literally working with Colombia that
have traffics the majority of cocaine in the
world? It's shocking how dishonest these people are.
I said though they militarily force their ISIS
proxies into leadership positions in Syria
while trying to and failing
to do the same with extremists in Venezuela.
If you're noticing a pattern here, you should.
This is how the US government operates. Hashtag
rules based international order.
I have some telling you, man. Failing to
the same thing.
I am telling you guys, I don't know.
I hate I'm gonna leave.
I read and reread these things before I
post them. It's telling you, there's something weird
going on there. But either way, the point
and he says, terrorists gonna terrorize.
Obviously, the point is this is consistent with
what the US government does. At the very
least, if you think Maduro is everything to
say he is, recognize that they only care
about that when they have an interest in
doing so. Will they work with people that
do far worse provably?
And not even just pointing to Israel's genocide.
There's many other examples in the world. It
is simple hypocrisy.
Now on another note, speaking of gross hypocrisy,
and and now with Israel and Iran,
we've talked about the MEK many times.
I actually can't believe this because of how
much attention it's got. I even think the
US government has largely distanced themselves from the
MEK, but they still work with them, the
CIA background. This is another regime change effort.
The MEK was the group that was supposed
to take power in
Iran in the last, like, 3 different Iran
regime change attempts that they failed in accomplishing.
I don't mean that as, like, a hypothetical,
guys. It was wildly obvious.
Here's Mike Pompeo, who, by the way, don't
forget, is very snug with Trump administration despite
not being given the position even though it
was floated.
Here he is standing with
Maryam, ruff, was it? Raja,
Rajabi, who is the head of the MEK.
Weirdly enough, kinda sanitized from her bio now.
But it says along with mister Rajabi,
missus Rajabi, I spoke today on ending Tehran's
threat to the Middle East. Oh, really? Iran's
threat. You want what take a quick moment
and highlight where they're hurting anybody. I'd love
to see it. I'm talking about foreign policy.
I don't support any of the governments. I
can point out a 1,000,000 problems they have
and things they do to oppress their people.
Same with literally every government on the planet.
That doesn't mean it's okay. But it means
the point is if we're gonna be objective
about it, it's no different. And if not,
it's objectively better than Saudi Arabia,
than Israel, than plenty of other places you
can literally show where they are murdering people
in the streets.
Now the point is, you could argue that
I know there's opinions about that in Iran.
Largely, I think a lot of that's misinformation.
But either way, let's just even say it's
happening. My point is, where in the world
do you see Iran in foreign policy
causing the same kind of destruction you're seeing
from Israel and United States?
The reason I say it like that is
because people immediately go, Hamas, Hezbollah, you. That's
not the truth. They are not proxies. They
are working as allies with a lot just
like a lot of other people that are
terrible in the world work with the United
States. So again, if you're gonna be
accurate,
consistent, then you point out both. But the
point, nonetheless, is those are being lied about
as we've proven a 1000 times over.
And you can literally I've said this so
many times. You take every single claim they've
ever made about Iran and just pretend it's
all true. You still don't even come to
a fraction of what you can prove
Israel and the US are doing. And that
is not even a fraction of the full
picture. That's just what you can prove.
It's shocking. They're literally committing genocide right now,
and he wants you to believe that Iran
has terrorized the Middle East.
It's these these people are desperate to roll
out this agenda and are seen right now
more than ever. I mean, look at the
engagement on this.
I mean, it's got 1,200,000
views, but it's got 3,000 likes.
These people have huge followings, and more and
more people are not engaging. Whether it's Tate
or Pompeo or all day I've been looking
at this. I'm finding it really interesting that
you're they're getting less engagement.
But it says,
recognizing the organized
opposition inside
Iran, which has been fighting the regime for
decades to establish a free republic and otherwise
means the hangover, leftover entities of their past
regime change. Right? Their internal f entities they're
funding and trying to use the CIA and
USAID and NED to overthrow their government.
It says must be an integral part of
reinstituting their maximum pressure. So Bas basically saying,
make sure the group that I've been working
with is the one that takes power.
And there he is.
This guy wearing a Mike Pompeo skin suit.
And this is what I find most interesting.
So you have Mike Pompeo
pushing a narrative that at one point was
what Israel also wanted. Right? But now I
don't know what has shifted or maybe just
Emily is not in the not in the
know. I don't know. But Emily Schrader, the
one of these very public Israel,
representatives during October 7th forward,
chimes in and says, MEK is a Marxist
Jihadist radical group.
I laughed out loud when I read that.
I'm like, duh duh, we've been telling you
that for we've been the funny thing is
that Americans, and they're honest, have been calling
this out for a long time. Israel and
the United States have been telling you MEK
was the group that should take power in
the United or in Israel in Iran, you
know, large portions of the leading conversation anyway.
And it says that that radical jihadist group
that has murdered US citizens. Yes. That's what
we were saying too.
Says stop promoting this woman. The Iranian people
do not support this. I agree. I'm actually
shocked to see an Israeli propagandist
admitting that. But again, it's not because she
cares about the truth, it's because I think
they've shifted what they want now.
I don't I think right now, whether they're
shifting into, we'll just take a run for
ourselves or I don't I don't know. But
it says, MEK helped the Islamic revolution take
place for crying out loud. I mean, guys,
it's hilarious to me.
Look at who's promoting this.
Even Donald Trump has leaned into it at
one point, but Rudy Giuliani. I mean, a
lot of politicians
because they were
paid, I argue, funded to do so.
It's fascinating to me.
So here,
you can watch this if you want. Nothing
is more frightening to the mullahs. Yeah. Right.
Here is here is, by the way, just
a thread of her posting stuff. Way down
here is where it says, we are celebrating
the MEKs, which is a different name for
it in in the, you know, the language
it comes from. That's the term we call
it here, MEK, I guess. I forgot what
it stands for. But it says, founding anniversary
when the religious dictatorship is going through one
of the worst stages of its existence.
Like, clear hello. Look. They're all wearing headscarves.
Look at that.
And in uniforms.
So if you wanna make a big deal
about Iran and headscarves, even though you could
prove that not everybody is forced to do
that in every place in Iran, there's sit
certain areas, by the way, just like in
Israel, where orthodox Jewish women are forced to
wear head coverings. We just don't we just
ignore that. The point here is the same
conversation.
That in is in Iran, you don't have
this ubiquitous thing they pretend they do. They
don't.
Here you have the group. They're telling you
they want to take power. Calling Iran a
religious dictatorship
while literally having far, far, far, far more
religious constrictions.
Look it up for yourself. The group is
crazy.
There's been entire articles
written about this. They they have this weird
invasive thing where they, like, they force themselves
into their
sexual lives of their partners and have interviews.
It's weird.
But note that the women are all in
the same uniform and wearing headscarves
while the men don't. I have no uniform,
nothing. Why is that?
I think you know why. And so the
funny point is, just like everything else, they're
pretending to fight these things while rolling it
out just like in Syria.
They are the ones that are making this
reality and pretending it's the evil jihadist Muslim
terrors. They are lying to you.
Here is an article from 2018. Former MEK
official exposes Saudi Arabia's covert funding of Iranian
terror group.
Oops.
So many of these, and it's the same
thing they do everywhere. Funding terrorist groups like
Hamas, for example, to keep them divided. Funding
the moderate rebels or every other example of
the US government doing so. That's what they
do, guys. In this case, MEK was funding
terrorist groups in Iran to overthrow Iran. That's
what they do.
Here is an article from 2018.
US' Iran regime change plan. Hit economy, orchestrate
protests, engage MEK cult to chant democracy.
All of this stuff is so shockingly obvious,
guys. It's all documented. Look at it for
yourselves.
Here's the one I've shown you many times.
This is an example of Rudy Giuliani
openly celebrating starvation of Iranian civilians at a
rally for the MEK. I think it was
paid something like $30,000
to show
up. It's in here somewhere. There's that clip
I'll I'll show you in a second.
And here's another one. Oh, that's just the
911 suspects clip that you should include from,
you know, a very Trump centric element who
is very, very involved with 911 that should
matter to you. But here is
Giuliani
praising this as the way these things should
go.
So now tell me that you're not a
serious threat.
It's the regime we're trying to overthrow sees
us as a threat.
You are a threat.
It is a reality.
The protests are getting worse. I don't know
when we're going to overthrow them. It could
be in a few days, months, a couple
of years, but it's gonna happen. They are
going to be overthrown.
Now remember, he's talking to the terrorist organization.
I mean, that was
registered was die
what's our word for it? Was was
I guess, registered. But, anyway, the point is
the US government called them a terrorist organization
on the record until they suddenly didn't want
that anymore. Right? So it's just it's crazy.
And he is being paid 1,000 tens of
1,000 of dollars to speak for them.
And here he is openly telling you, we're
gonna overthrow Iran and acting like we're not
doing that. But then openly telling you that
what they've done has collapsed their dollar or
their their their money
to the point to where people are selling
their organs for food. And that's how we
do this. That's what he's saying.
That's the kind of person we're dealing with.
Months, a couple of years. Oh, and other
point is recognize the screen. And you're only
this was not something that was supposed to
be public. Somebody got a hold of a
screen videotape version of this, and it went
everywhere. It's gonna happen. They are going to
be overthrown.
The people of Iran obviously have now had
enough.
The sanctions are working.
The currency is
going to nothing. What do you mean Iran?
See, so even when you're speaking to them,
he has to lie, like, that they had
enough
of what? They're suffering because of your sanctions.
That's how it's it's demonstrated as you highlight.
And then say that they've had enough, yeah,
of what you're doing to them. Because guess
what? That's how it's supposed to work. We
we make the people suffer so they revolt
on their government. Even though they know we're
doing this, they're so desperate. They look. We
don't care. Just make the suffering end.
Unless you're as resilient as the Palestinian people,
it seems.
They're where Russia was. They're where Poland was.
We see signs of young men and women
saying, give me some food. We saw a
sign of a man trying to sell his
internal organs for 500 American dollars,
probably a fortune in Iran today.
This is truly pitiful.
These are the kinds of conditions that lead
to
successful revolution.
God. What a gross absolute monster.
And this guy is a very connected element
in the government, but Trump's administration as well.
And as we said, as this is James
Corbett's work, make sure you watch it all.
Oh, I forgot. Damn it. Of course, it's
deleted on YouTube. I'll have to go back
and add the regular link to that. But
I think the link to his main show
is right here or right here. But
it's an important clip to understand. He's one
element of the whole conversation. Same with the
dancing Israelis and all many other parts to
the 911 suspects.
Now to finish on some other points around
Israel and and the ICC,
I wanna highlight this. Here's the same guy
I pointed out before doing this yet again.
You'll you'll get the same thing like this,
like, the same most of these propagandists will
do this. Like, well, like, I see Joan
do it all the time where they repackage
the same exact thing and share it another
throw the count same way and post it,
like, 7 times or every day for 7
days straight. That's that's just nobody does that
unless they're trying to manipulate you. He says,
this isn't Gaza. It's Sudan. And do you
remember, I just pointed him out saying the
same thing like the day before. And And
he goes, the RSF is carrying out a
genocide in Sudan, but the world is silent.
No. It's really not, man. I said there
he says there's no protests. No encampments. No
calls. What do you mean encamps?
What are you talking about? No calls for
boycott, divest because we're not dealing with something
where you are for. Like, right now, you
have a situation where Israel's gonna make a
genocide.
Right? And this is being forced down our
throats by our government literally taking part in
it
on record. That's the difference. So people see
that and go, we don't want any part
in that. We don't want us we don't
our money going to support that. In the
Sudan, most people don't know it's the same
thing. That the US and Israel are acutely
involved in everything happening there as I've shown
you every time. I'll show you again. But
that's why you don't have the people doing
that. But that's not the same as saying
nobody's talking about it, because they are.
Many, many people. But I'll I'll read what
I said below in a second. Is that
if it did,
it would be calling out genocide and crimes
and humanity around the world. Instead, its only
goal is to spread malicious lies about Israel.
Contribute to anti semitic, only Jewish yeah. That's
what it's about. Not that you're murdering starving
children to death, but because you're Jewish. That
that's it. Like, it's amazing that ever hold
that ever held sway over people.
That's propaganda for you. Now it doesn't. Now,
in to be as all as as many
Jewish people and other will point out, like,
I'm forgetting the what the other person I
was thinking of too is,
I don't forget his name too. Jeez.
The PhD.
Shoot.
Man, what is his name? And, almost had
it.
The whatever. I like, that's so frustrating. I'm
surprised I forgot his name. The guy I've
interviewed him. The guy the has a PhD
from Princeton in Palestinian history.
That's so frustrating. I hate when I care
about something. Anyway, I know I lost my
thought on that too.
Well, the point is just simply, like, going
back to the origin of it. Just simply
really trying to force in the idea
that this is about hating Jewish people. Right?
Which is just lazy. Right? While we can
literally watch them murdering people in live TV,
and knowing that it's not just Jewish people
doing that. Like, it's just so irresponsible.
But they know what they're doing because they
don't have any other way to go.
And this is about the Sudan.
But I said,
your whole you didn't care about this genocide,
so ours is okay shtick is about as
desperate as it gets. It really is like
the last possible way to minimize.
So all you're really doing is saying they're
both genocides, but you don't care about that
one, so you're not allowed to care about
ours?
That's what he's doing. Like, it's just it's
embarrassingly obvious, but it's about saying, well, you
know, you guys are dressed as bad. Like,
that's, like, the last ditch effort.
And I said, and by the way, most
who care about human suffering in Gaza also
care about it anywhere else. And did call
it out. Also, Israel involved in the genocide
in Sudan. And here's just one of them.
Oh, I might as well grab the other
one too since just pulling up real quick.
Robert wrote these 2020, 2024.
The US Israel Israeli hand in Sudan's horrifying
civil war. Now you it's not even up
for debate, guys.
It's on the record. They are involved. Like
they are everywhere else, it seems, in every
horrible thing happening in the world. And I'm
really not. I shouldn't be hyperbolic.
Not literally everything. But truly, if you look
into this stuff, you'll find it overwhelming how
many things are connected. This one goes back
in further 2023.
The US is heavily involved in Sudan's renewed
turmoil. Western media omit this.
They're profiting from it, guys. They're using it
like they do everywhere else.
It's
sick.
And the problem is that all they wanna
do is get you distracted, get you, again,
like, freaking out about some other location.
Al Jazeera English points out that US vice
president-elect JD Vance warns of consequences if Gaza
captive deal not done, not happen, including US
helping Israel knock out final Hamas battalions. Because
that makes sense. Right? So if you don't
give us what we want, we're gonna help
Israel destroy the rest of Gaza. If that's
even if there's anything left. You wanna keep
pretending like this means anything other than we're
on Israel's side all the time?
It's it's just it's it's just dishonest to
do anything else. Now what I I'm gonna
go and do more in the next show.
Right now, there's a lot of conversations swinging
around about these deals.
Here, I'll just grab these real quick and
just show you. I had these pulled aside.
Jeremy Skahill pointing this out.
Smotrich saying this.
I'll go into this more in the next
show.
Just these three here. So the bottom line
is, as you see every single time and
that's not hyperbolic.
Every single time, it's been the same way.
Proven even by Israeli media at this point.
Jeremy says, I've been speaking with Palestinian negotiators.
This was,
today. On the ceasefire exchange of captives. That's
all happening at the end, and Biden, the
conversation,
acting like we might have a deal this
time. And so it's very clear that the
narrative being promoted, as every time before it
by the US and Israel, is that everyone's
waiting for Hamas to accept the deal. And
that's false.
There's an ongoing back and forth. So they're
already starting from dishonesty. They do it every
single time. By putting them on the back
heel saying we're waiting on them to do
it while openly they're still not even there
yet is a way to already make it
seem like Hamas is holding up the process.
Every Zionist in the world lurches into that
and goes, that's Hamas. We knew it.
Because, you know, just like just like partisans,
by the way. Don't miss the overlap.
And it says there seems to be cautious
optimism from Palestinians that it might happen. That's
good. From his perspective, anyway.
And this one is somebody highlighting this. You
know, they're talking about the whole thing saying,
Trump's, envoy says a tense meeting with Netanyahu
during the former basically, the you might secure
a deal.
And it says, necessary to secure a hostage
deal by 20th.
So it's really making this about Trump, which
is interesting.
But overall, here's what Smotrich had to say.
Very telling.
He says, the emerging deal is a catastrophe
for the national security state of Israel. We
will not be part of a surrender deal
that would include releasing terrorist hostages. So this
is hilarious how right as they're pretending it's
happening, somebody who's not like, let's be clear.
He's not technically the leader,
but he has, in some cases, more influence
than Netanyahu right now.
And he says that that won't happen.
Stopping the war dissolving its achievements
that were brought with much blood. Achievements. He's
calling the genocide an achievement. He said, and
abandoning many hostages.
How in the world are you talking about
abandoning hostages when the deal is for the
rest of them that you haven't killed already?
He doesn't want them back, you understand guys?
That's been pretty clear so far. This is
the time to continue with all our might,
to occupy and cleanse the entire strip. Oh,
you mean the thing that you promised was
never ever even on the table?
Guys, it's crazy how we've lost the plot
here.
And or at least the people that are
pretending
like this is not obviously a genocide.
Look at that. How we've gone from we're
just trying to stop the bad guys. We're
not dropping stopping aid. We're not gonna occupy.
We're not gonna take this. To literally destroying
everything in Gaza, already building settlements, having settlers
already come in causing a a a quarter
down the middle and through the other side.
So now and and telling us you're never
leaving the north, and now you're telling us
you're all gonna take the entirety of Gaza.
You're not taking parts of Syria leading into
Lebanon.
Look how far this has gone. Well, you're
now telling us you're gonna restrict aid. All
the things that were screaming fake news, now
suddenly why we're gonna do it.
To finally take control of the humanitarian aid
from mosque. Oh, that's why
we have to control all of Gaza because
otherwise, the mosque will take all the aid,
even though that's provably the opposite of what's
happening.
Wow.
It says, and you open the gates of
hell on Gaza until Hamas surrenders completely.
And all hostage are returned. Oh, so you're
gonna turn it all into hell until they're
returned, which means they're gonna all die, which
is your plan.
Hannibal directive.
Unreal.
So check this
out. Oops.
I gotta highlight this the right way because
it's for in Hebrew.
Damn it, that's so frustrating.
There we go.
There it is. Okay. It says, in the
context of returning all the abductees, then it's
being fact checked. During 15 months of military
action in Gaza Strip, at least 30 abductees
who arrived in Gaza alive
were murdered or killed in captivity. The IDF
rescued only 8. In contrast, a 117 were
returned alive. So they're basically telling you what
we all know. They have been killing their
own hostages, whether by accident or not, the
entire time. And it's pretty clear that it
was not by accident.
Simple as that. That's the deal for you
though. So the point is is he's going,
they better have this deal done.
Okay. And if they don't have the deal
done, what are they saying? Then we're gonna
help Israel.
Oh, gee. That clearly incentivizes Netanyahu to make
the deal happen, doesn't it? When seeming when
apparently the detriment the
the consequence
is more help from the United States?
Come on, guys.
These people are not on your side.
Now, the ICC point is quick. Massey points
this out on 9th. The house did only
one thing on 9th. They passed a bill
to protect Netanyahu.
All of them.
K? That's everyone. And unless Vance was already
resigned, him too.
He voted present.
But you go through the list. Glenn points
out Prem Thacker simply saying 243 to 140
to 1. 1 being Massey, by the way.
And it says to sanction anyone associated with
the International Criminal Court, efforts to investigate, arrest,
detain, or prosecute
any protected person of the US and its
allies, namely Israel.
So they're just making a list of those
you are you are not allowed to go
after. How do you not see that as
I mean, there's so many words to call
it.
Certainly not it rules based international order, is
it?
Glenn says, I was starting to get worried.
It's been like 3 whole days since the
US Congress approved a new measure to shield,
protect, or fund Israel.
Everybody sees it. Prem Thacker pointing out the
45 Democrats who joined Republicans in voting to
sanction the ICC.
And Mike Pompeo saying good for speaker Johnson
for bringing back the legislation to sanction the
ICC. Right? Because Johnson's on our side. Right?
Was it 30 seconds ago we ever and
was screaming bad Johnson because the spending bill?
It's amazing how quickly we forget.
I simply said, make Israel great again.
Here is congressman Mike Lauer, same thing. The
ICC has been infected by is anti Israel
bias, one after another.
Brian Mast, Randy Weber,
every one of those stepping up to go,
we stand with Israel while it's committing genocide,
and they all know you know that.
You need to think about that. The house
decided one of its first orders of business
would be to impose sanctions against the ICC
on behalf of a foreign persons deemed to
have been protected status.
My god. That's a US bill.
Starting to get the picture? Maybe you hopefully,
you got it years ago as we were
covering this stuff.
Stephanie Bice, ICC has zero credibility. Every single
one of them.
Brianna Wu.
Vivid says, United States Congress announces sanctions on
the ICC and arrest warrants. Prime minister, this
is huge.
ICC is going down.
And it says an embarrassing number of Democrats
voted against this and a massive number abstained.
Think about a while it is. Right? So
you got people that want to call it
Israel, but are afraid to point out that
Democrats, for whatever reason, in in this case,
voted correctly.
That's not to say they care
or don't support Israel, but, nonetheless, again, opportunism
or not, they still voted. Do not do
this. This is a bad thing. What they're
doing here is protecting a war criminal.
So my point is to recognize how clearly
it is that this is who whether Democrat,
Republican, or Independent, whoever voted against this voted
correctly, at least as I see it.
She goes, it's really hard to convince Jewish
people that Democrats are taking our antisemitism problem
seriously. So it's an antisemitism
problem
to vote against
holding or basically, point is that not going
after Netanyahu is antisemitism?
Or all the way around. See, I'm stupid.
She's trying to make it out to be
antisemitic to go after a war criminal
It has to do with stopping him from
murdering Palestinians. How is antisemitic? The only thing
that they make that the only thing they
claim makes it antisemitic is that that Netanyahu
is in Israel and is a Jewish person,
they claim, which by the way, I don't
think any of these Zionists care about any
of this. But either
regardless, how is that anti Semitic to say
this guy kills children?
So if you if you say a a
guy killed children turned out to be a
Christian. Is it anti Christian?
Is it anti Christian to call out to
put a person in prison in the United
States to kill somebody because they're Christian?
You all know it's stupid. You many too
too many are still afraid to call it
out because of idiots like Breanna
Wu. Congressman Juan
I mean, everybody. From no name politicians to
the top, screaming about this.
It says, we thank speaker Johnson and house
GOP majority for their leadership.
This is the Republican Jewish Coalition.
Congressman Mitchell Michael Guest, he goes, since being
elected, I've always strived to support my greatest
ally. I will always stand with Israel. Like,
just imagine making these statements while they
they know you see them.
Nancy Mace, she just thinks she's so cool.
Trying she thinks she's the hip one trying
to she literally calls,
Code Pink
domestic terrorists.
So just pay attention everybody. You can be
a domestic terrorist if you wear a red
hat. You can be a domestic terrorist if
you call out politicians who support actual terrorists.
Either way, the the cavalier way she calls
them domestic terrorists, you realize how serious that
charge is?
It just shows you, 1, how childishly in
irresponsible these people are, or also just that
they're
dangerous.
Tom Cotton, one of the mo one of
the this guy is ridiculous.
Again, it just seems like a a guy
who got picked on his entire life, who
just likes wielding power, and is happy to
take money from a foreign genocide and committing
power because it makes him feel powerful. But
that's my opinion. Either way, he's wrong. And
it goes, why should Israel be responsible for
prodding aid to Gaza? Because they are.
Period. Because they're responsible for the occupation. They're
responsible for be
whether he knows or not,
whether he's just an idiot or he's lying,
it doesn't matter. The point is they are
responsible because they are occupying a territory. That's
international law. They don't get just because it
goes on for 76 years does not change
that fact. He has an interest in hiding
that because he's pro Israel at the expense
of American interests.
Here he is again.
This is 60 minutes
highlighting the truth about what's going on there
for the first time in a long time.
US diplomat is saying she documented images coming
out of Gaza for the state department. Fragments
of US bombs next to massacres of mostly
children.
And they go on to prove this in
this doc because you don't need them to
prove it. We've been proving it for over
a year. Here's how Tom Cotton responds while
we all see this.
He goes 60 minutes,
runs a disgraceful hit job against Israel. He
includes the recently hid Kamal's transcript. Right. So
they like Israel. So are they rather they
they're they're pro Kamala. So you could already
pretend like what they say is false.
These guys are children. He goes 60 minutes
fought that Hamas forgot that Hamas started the
war. No. They didn't. And whether he knows
it or not is irrelevant.
Hamas still holds American hostages.
Yes. But you'll be forgiven for for
recognizing that he's not talking about the many
American Palestinians or just Americans that are still
trapped in Gaza. Because he doesn't care about
Americans. He cares about Israeli Americans.
And it goes, and any damage in Gaza?
That's sole fault of Hamas. No. It's a
fault of the people bombing Gaza.
They just I don't even need to go
further. Everyone watching this hopefully knows how stupid
all this is. How you can prove that's
not the case. It didn't start on October
7th. No. They they don't only care there
aren't only American hostages there or whatever. The
point is there are Americans that aren't Israeli.
They're there, he doesn't care about.
He wants you to believe
that this is a
victim Israel being attacked by a terrorist and
all the world and stand up and literally
knows we know that's not true. And then
shouts down a mainstream article that finally finds
the courage to highlight this. And by the
way, lays it out in proof. And he
still says this. We need to realize how
truly compromised these people are.
And again, blackmail, maybe threatened, maybe maybe they
are Zionist and they never, I mean, they
who knows?
Or maybe none of that. And they just
are dishonest. The bottom line is, you know
he's lying and he's doing so at the
expense of American interest in in the interest
of a foreign government.
I said, it's wild to me.
It is what it it what's wild to
me is that you know we see you.
You know we know what Israel's doing,
and yet you double down anyway.
Either you are fully compromised or you're proving
to us that we do not have a
representative
government. Likely both.
Hashtag Zionist occupied government. No. Not some some
buzzword from before. Now I'm talking about Zionism,
not Jewish people. And I'm talking about
Zionism is not Judaism.
The point though, guys,
if you think for one second that a
politician who requires your votes to stay in
power would do this or shout you down
knowing the vast majority doesn't agree with him?
How is that there's the only world that
exists in is a world where he doesn't
worry about your vote.
Annie, Elon Musk,
autism capital, yet again.
So is, Al as Alice Wield said, Israel
is very complicated. To be honest, I don't
see a solution. Maybe Israel has to find
some alliances with Sunni states if possible. I'm
not a politician to say such things. What
do you think, Elon? And he says, do
you unequivocally support the existence of a state
called Israel?
And Alice says, yes, of course. We need
to protect the existence of Israel.
That's your response to that question.
And that's all. He just quotes these ridiculous
things. He gets 14,000,000
views on that.
Why? Because Elon said clear.
That's it.
You know, while while they're committing genocide. I
think you have to understand how crazy that
is. And I said while the vast majority
of the world sees and acknowledges the ongoing
genocide that he no doubt sees,
he doubles down every day.
There are only a few logical explanations to
that. I mean, guys, you need to really
think about this.
Now lastly
and this we probably have another, yeah, more
past 4 hours. I could end it right
now, really, but I wanna play these clips.
So we probably have another half an hour.
If you wanna take around, I recommend you
do.
And we're talking about TikTok here, and then
a couple of videos on the way out
to show you the influence we're talking about.
That comes all the way back around to
the point of the real globalist technocrat Zionist
agenda that is rolling out.
Now James Lee
highlights the aspect of TikTok and censorship around
this, but showing you yet again, this is
the same thing where you have republican government
representing this as fighting what or China or
whatever else when you can see that it's
not even about that?
The common thread is not hard to see
right now. You just have to have the
courage to be able to look.
James Lee says, guess which country is funding
all the research about how dangerous TikTok is
and how its users don't hate China enough?
As usual,
he says got all the receipts.
Never guess who else behind all the research,
quote unquote, proving that TikTok brainwashed America's youth.
Well, maybe you do have some inkling, but
I have all the receipts. 1st, a little
context. TikTok is fighting for its life right
now in the Supreme Court because they tell
us that it is a supposed national security
threat, and, also, its algorithm is supposedly pushing
very dangerous ideas on Americans. The evidence for
the so called threat to national security comes
courtesy of the justice department, which as you
can see here is just a whole lot
of trust me, bro. And in terms of
the dangerous algorithm, they will say that TikTok
is actively manipulating perceptions of China and the
Chinese Communist party through algorithmic bias. And this
is the seminal study they're going to cite,
which is titled information manipulation on TikTok and
its relation to American users' beliefs about China.
It is a paper put out by NCRI,
Network Contagion Research Institute at Rutgers University, which
once again, they conclude that TikTok is, quote,
indoctrination
at scale. But here's what they don't tell
you about that study. That study never analyzes
the for you page, which is how everybody
uses TikTok, nor do they ever look at
view count, which is just super weird. All
they did was some arbitrary categorization
count of pro or anti CCP videos, which
they found through searches. I mean, why wouldn't
they, a, factor in how the user actually
uses the app, which is the for you
page? And, b, if they're claiming that they're
worried about ideas spreading like wildfire, why aren't
they actually looking at the view counts of
these videos? But, hey, that's just my take
on it. You can look up the study
and judge the methodology for yourself. But could
it be that the conclusion
was predetermined
for
reasons? Because guess who runs the Network Contagion
Research Institute? Oh, and by the way, what
I'm about to show you has been entirely
scrubbed from the Internet. I had to go
to the way back machine to find their
about page, which is now deleted.
Now ask yourself why that is.
That's a very interesting thing to find out.
About us pages don't usually get removed when
they still have the platform up. So realize,
I think it's about what he's about to
show you, and clearly he does too.
First, you got guys at Big Tech, most
notably Peter Norvig, director of research at Google,
and we know they want the competition gone.
Then you have the folks from the military.
For example, this gentleman, Jacob Shapiro, chief scientific
officer,
US Navy. More military, Denver Riggleman. He did
advanced analysis for the NSA.
And, you know, they have a little bit
of a vested interest in keeping our enemies
our enemies. The final piece of the puzzle,
perhaps the most important, people like Alex Goldenberg,
lead intelligence
analyst, who did intelligence work
for APAC. Last but not least, the director
and cofounder Joel Finkelstein,
he is from the Anti Defamation League. Okay.
That is a lot there. And, unfortunately,
there is a lot that I'm gonna have
to leave unsaid
for reasons.
Some dots that you're just gonna have to
connect for yourself.
I will leave you with what Mitt Romney
had to say.
Typically, the Israelis are good at PR.
What's happened here? Some wonder why there was
such overwhelming support,
for us to shut down potentially TikTok or
other entities of that nature. If you look
at the, the postings on TikTok and the
number of mentions of Palestinians relative to other
social media sites, it's overwhelmingly
so among, TikTok,
broadcast. So I'd, I'd know that's of of,
of real interest.
Exactly.
Now, clearly, you see who's pointing to. Okay?
Now he includes a breakdown of the source
material, which you can check out for yourself.
I recommend you do.
Now, I'm gonna play a clip real quickly
that he mentions about the ADL. So, seeing
as how these people Now, what my point
is interesting is right as the TikTok thing
becomes a very prominent situation, they're literally about
to ban this thing, which is a huge
conversation. It's a very imperialistic act from a
controlling authoritarian government to tell you what you
can and can't look at based on the
idea of vague national security. Whatever you think
about it, it's pretty crazy. It's everything they
would scream about if China was doing or
anybody else.
So I wanna highlight this for you
about what he has told you in regard
to the ADL in the past. And you
should know this by now, or APAC for
that matter. These are Israeli entities. These fake
American game they play, I can prove to
you going back just through Wikipedia, but well
more than that, that APAC was simply a
rebranded Israeli group that they just pretend as
an American group today and the same damn
thing with this.
Still have the power to monitor social media
act Now this is James again on his
documentary talking about the ADL.
Power to monitor social media activity across all
major platforms and change social media algorithms the
way they see fit. Now, we just talked
about this. I posted it recently again because
that just happened on Twitter. And to this
very day, Greenblatt and ADL are active partners
with Twitter.
Are you a conservative? You gotta call this
stuff out. I know many of you are.
Don't believe me? Well, here's Jonathan Greenblatt, the
CEO of the ADL. We work with YouTube
to have we to get them to change
their algorithms. We work with Facebook
on trying to use a redirect method. So
when you search for holocaust, you get directed
to, like, a Yad Vashem
page.
We opened
a center in Silicon Valley back in 2017.
And the woman who runs it, she's the
next Facebook executive.
I have software engineers and data scientists working
at ADL. We're monitoring
all this stuff, and we're working with all
the platforms, by the way. Google and YouTube
and Meta and Twitter and Reddit and Steam
and Amazon, all these companies. From, like, Apple
to Zoom, we work with all of them.
Some might call that a conspiracy fact.
Just saying. And if their ability to influence
big tech and media isn't disturbing enough,
the ADL also partners with payment platforms like
PayPal to monitor online transactions
and cancel payment processing for those whose speech
they disapprove of. Just to understand this, is
this simply a research effort or is the
ultimate goal, I imagine, to effectively defund them,
which is to say that PayPal would effectively
turn off the spigot
or at least turn off the ability for
them to fundraise using PayPal? That's correct, Andrew.
And don't forget TLAB was deleted from PayPal.
Lost about $6,000 they stole from me. Same
old. Same old. Now we're being attacked with
fake lawsuits and lawfare from the same dynamic.
That's a wrap up in general. Here's another
clip.
Chris Mahan points out. Here's the ADL CEO,
Jonathan Greenblatt, saying,
the kind of genius behind the pager attack
on Lebanon
is what's needed to fight antisemitism.
This is not a joke. Okay? He is
in Israel speaking to the Knesset,
openly saying that the way we need to
fight antisemitism
or rather, I shouldn't say it as specifically
as that. In the conversation, he's saying that
the we need the kind of genius like
we saw in the pager attack in our
broad effort to fight antisemitism.
Now, obviously, people are gonna argue, he didn't
mean put explosives in pagers for people in
the United States. Well, yeah. I'm I would
hell I would sure as hell not jump
to that conclusion with what we see going
on today. But I'm not gonna argue that's
as broad as he's making it. But that's
terrifying
because of what we know here, guys. Because
of the obvious. Watch this show. As the
title, Israel's infiltration of US tech.
In light of what happened in Lebanon, it
is wild to see how compromised we are
right now. The technology, the technology companies. I'm
gonna end with some of this stuff.
Or this article or the show we covered,
Israel's simply just their global cybersecurity infiltration.
All over the place.
Now this says,
watch green flag goes on to tell Israeli
government how important it is to capture TikTok.
Capturing TikTok might seem less meaningful than holding
on to Mount Hermon,
but this is urgent because the next war
will be decided based on how Israel and
its allies perform online.
Capturing TikTok? Does that sound like what they're
trying to do?
Like, maybe that seems like the reality of
what Israel's doing through the US, It's funny
how we get a different perception, or maybe
Alan's wrong. Either way, they sure think something
different's going on than what the US is
pretending to do.
Here's the full story if you wanna check
it out. I just we just need to
be aware of how concerning this is.
It's on display, and we're gonna basically show
this to end. Well, actually, Ethan saying, TikTok
would literally rather shut itself off from the
largest market than divest from CCP.
That's all you're tapping from the Republican narrative.
Is that what you really think is happening?
And it says, to put it bluntly, these
are not the actions of a rational corporation.
They're giving their entire game away on who
really calls the shots. And it says TikTok
says it plans
to shut down the site unless Supreme Court
strikes down law forcing it to sell.
So think about this. So you're literally telling
us it's a propaganda tool, and the US
is trying to buy it.
So in every possible point, they would obviously
not do that because if you are accurate,
then you're selling a tool propaganda manipulation to
your enemy. Yeah. That makes perfect sense. Why
they would okay. So then what is let's
just say it's not what they say it
is.
Well, you don't wanna sell your company because
it's your company. Like, the idea that they
think it's about or it it not wanting
to fall into a forced sell sale of
something that is proving that they it's it's
just partisan
nonsense logic.
Certainly could mean that,
but the larger point oh, wait. Thought it
was back.
Did I not have it pulled up?
Basically, somebody the whole thing oh, I think
it was right here. Oh, this just this
one. Another one too. But I'll this this
will work. Saying the US isn't TikTok's largest
market.
So
wrong on that point too. But overall, the
idea that somehow it proves that they don't
want the CCP controls them so much. Guys,
it's
what I can see about the evidence in
no way proves that's the case. Certainly could
be there. But just as equally, it could
be something else. Or now that we have
Israel trying to work its way in to
control it for the obvious point that Greenblatt
just made. Is that better?
It's just it's not about helping you or
fighting all propaganda. It's about using the tools
for themselves against you.
And we're gonna end with this. Now there's
clips in general that are gonna take, you
know, a little bit of time. I won't
play the whole thing, I think.
But Whitney shares this, former CIA intelligence expert,
the terrorists are already here.
This has been doing the rounds. And she's
Whitney says, yes, they are. But they're the
terrorists are the CIA. And I said, and
and the Zionist.
Here she is again. Mac Blumenthal pointing it
out, former CIA targeter
off the Sean Ryan podcast,
which has now been making the rounds. She's
selling he as he frames it,
says it has to be one of the
biggest fraudsters. Says she's selling low IQ MAGA
types on the inevitability of a large scale
911 attack, but it's like it's more like
the Hamas attack. That's how she's framing it.
Inside America in the near future. Adam sources
are unnamed, referred simply to as we because
we don't exist. If she had any classified
info revealing it on the podcast would violate
top secret security clearance that she supposedly possess
Basic logic, guys. Naturally, she prescribes more mass
surveillance and invasive airport security as the only
logical response. How are conservatives
falling for this?
Well, here's one way that's happening.
Now, I think
Yeah. I'm gonna just do it like this.
I'm gonna end with these videos. Okay? So
stick around. I think you should watch these,
but I think we're gonna end with this.
I'm just gonna play it out. So stick
around as much as you want. These important
these videos important. One's, like, 15 minutes, but
I'm probably not gonna play the whole thing.
But I wanna go through each one of
them
to end in general on that note. Right?
The idea that it's pretty damn obvious right
now that the infiltration
is happening and and long since been done
in this country. And right now, we're watching
them solidify that. Build out their control around
it while telling you they're fighting some other
entity.
It's it's pretty terrifying. And I think the
reality is Americans are already very uncomfortably aware
of it, just don't know what to do.
So the very first thing we need to
do is call out what you see. Don't
blindly support a political entity because other people
tell you you should. Call it out. Because
right now, I think the importance is the
is the flow of information and the people
showing the world that we're not blindly following
along with whatever they're doing.
And I think it's obvious that right now,
especially on this note about talking, you know,
talking about infiltration. Right? Talking about the idea
of
internal elements about the overthrow our government or
911 style attacks
through groups that are literally funded and controlled
by the Israeli United States. She's pointing to
an Al Qaeda style. That is them, guys.
So when we play these to finish, ask
yourself what we're really talking about here and
why she's been making the rounds floating this
idea when if you wanna talk about an
infiltrated element ready to spring,
it's about what we're gonna show you right
now.
Thank you all for tuning in. I love
you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant. When I first started APAC, Steve
Rosen, who was my boss and was later
indicted for espionage against United States.
I know. Like, he's still around, though. You're
allowed to get indicted for espionage.
Pence, you're doing it for.
He sent me a now famous memo. It's
now famous because I gave it to the
Washington Post.
He wrote he warned me not to ever
talk this is my 2nd day there. Never
to talk about APAC's
activities outside the lobby. He wrote, a lobby
is a night flower. It thrives in the
dark and shrivels up in the sunlight.
I think that may be happening now. Thanks
to all our efforts efforts. If it does,
not only United States, but Israel, the Palestinians,
and the world will be better off. This
night flower needs crushing. I have a somewhat
unique perspective on APAC owing to the fact
that I was employed there for 6 years
as a volunteer for 2 years in the
seventies
as a senior staffer in the eighties, but
I also did see them from Capitol Hill
where I worked for 15 years for democratic
house members and senators.
One of my tasks at APAC was writing
its manual about Israel and the Arabs designed
to be used
as a guide by students, congressional staffers, rabbis,
etcetera,
to defend Israel against the lies being the
lies being told by the other side.
It's called myths and facts.
Although inside of APAC, it was always called
myths and myths.
You know, myth. This is this is standard
hanzbara,
myth.
They say the Palestinians were driven from their
homes by the Israeli army in 1948.
Fact. The Palestinians actually left their homes
in in in what became Israel in search
of better lives in the West Bank and
Gaza.
This is that was part of my job
was writing this stuff, but these myths have
been
around much longer than I've been.
I will use the frame myths and facts
to address the most common misconceptions
about APAC as I see them. And I
wanna clarify at this point. I worked at
a I left APAC in 1986.
And after that, I've only dealt with them
from the outside from Capitol Hill, and you're
not as a staffer.
I didn't leave there under bad terms. I
wasn't fired from APAC. In fact, when I
left in 86,
I didn't it wasn't as right wing as
it subsequently became.
So,
I I'm not grinding an axe when I
tell you when you hear my feelings about
that organization
that was my employer. But the first myth
I wanna deal with is kind of a
pro APAC myth.
It is an APAC's role in intimidating members
of congress to support its demands through the
use of financial pressure and intimidation
is unique.
That this pressure
is an aberration invented by Israel supporters
to advance the Israel's government goals. Fact,
APAC is not an aberration.
Basically, every decision
congress makes
is made with an eye on who has
the money and how can a legislator either
get some of it or avoid it being
deployed against them.
We don't
do things like this to the Israelis
ever.
We also don't spy on the Israelis, ever,
because of the political pressure
that that would put the CIA under on
Capitol Hill. Intelligence, and the the FBI's role
in counterintelligence.
That is trying to spot spies who are
spying on us. Whether they're moles, which is
unusual,
or,
intelligence officers of a foreign country.
Well, most embassies here in Washington have what
are called declared officers. Those are
foreign intelligence officers who are here, and they
are
formally known to the FBI and the CIA
as intelligence officers.
Right? So they're here to
exchange paper
and liaise and
meet with their CIA and FBI counterparts and
then go back to their embassies and write
a report and send it back to their
capitals.
This FBI agent told us at the time
that the Israeli embassy was unusual. Now remember,
this is 32 years ago, so the information
is very old. But just to give you
an idea of what we were looking at,
the Israeli embassy had 2 declared officers, one
from Shin Bet and one from Mossad.
And it had
187 undeclared officers
that the FBI had been able to identify
spread out all across America,
in academia,
in the defense contracting industry.
We've all seen the Americans.
Right? The Israelis do the same thing, just
like we do the same thing.
But we were told that very first day
that I was at the agency,
that
we have no
international friends.
Not really.
I mean, you can argue now the 5
Eyes, the British, the the Australians, New Zealanders,
the Canadians.
Not the Israelis.
The Israelis were
a country,
a service that we,
we had to be leery of. In some
cases, we had to fear.
I thought that was probably an overstatement at
the time. And after I had been at
the CIA for 3 years, I decided I
wanted to go overseas.
There was a program that the state department
ran called the analyst overseas program, where they'll
take CIA analysts and
transfer them to the state department. So you're
a legitimate state department foreign service officer, and
you go overseas, and you work for 2
years in an embassy, and then come back
and you transfer back to the CIA.
So I thought, well, do I wanna go
to or do I wanna go somewhere else?
And I decided to go to Bahrain.
2 of the happiest years of my life.
The guy that I sat next to for
those 3 years,
he went to Jerusalem along with his wife.
Now because they had been to Israel before,
the CIA decided to declare them as a
courtesy and to say, look, we have these
2 people, this married couple. They're not spies.
They're analysts. One of them isn't even really
an analyst. He's gonna go to to graduate
school
while his wife is doing the analysis.
We just want you to know that they're
here as a courtesy
on assignment to the state department.
What the Israelis did over the next 2
years was to carry out a campaign of
harassment. And the reason I bring this up
is because it's quite common.
The third time it happened,
they came home and their dog
was yelping and laying on the floor of
the kitchen.
Someone had cut its tail off
and then wrapped it in gauze and tape.
Mhmm. And the 3rd, the 4th time it
happened to them, they had they had done
their Christmas shopping, they had a
tree up in the,
the living room, and they had gone to
the ambassador's Christmas
all of the presents were gone. All of
them.
$1,000
worth of Christmas presents.
Now, this kind of thing happens all the
time, and so
the ambassador has to go to the Israelis
and say, look, cut it out. Leave my
people alone.
And they say, okay. Okay. And then they'll
back off for a little while, and then
they start up again.
So
we don't
do things like this to the Israelis, ever.
We also don't spy on the Israelis, ever,
because of the political pressure that that would
put the CIA under on Capitol Hill. I
made a little note to myself.
To be sure to talk about the dichotomy
between the State Department and CIA on one
hand, and the White House and Capitol Hill
on the other hand.
All the years that I worked at the
CIA,
And being an animal an analyst working on
Iraq, an enemy country at the time,
I was declared to,
my god, more foreign intelligence services than I
can even remember. It was dozens,
dozens of them.
I only spoke to the Israelis once,
in 15 years
that I was there.
I had only been on the job about
6 months,
and I was told
by my boss,
you're gonna brief the Israelis,
this afternoon. I said, okay.
And he said, we don't meet with them
here in the building. We can't trust them
to come into the building. So we're gonna
meet them out. There's a special
place
where we meet them.
Because they kept trying to bring bugs into
the building. Right?
Oh, we'll give you this gift. Well, the
gift weighs twice what it should because it's
full of batteries and a listening device, and
you can't bring that in here.
So
I went to, brief the Israelis. Now because
I was the junior most analyst at the
time, and it was like 7 or 8
of us that were there,
I was the last one to speak. And
so we went around the table, and it
was the Mossad person and the Shin Bet
person, and they're writing down every word that
the analysts are saying.
Finally, they came to me, and because I
was not undercover, I was an over employee
at the time, I used my real name.
I said, my name is John Kiriakou, and
the shin bet officer
says to me, spell it.
So I spelled it for him, and he
looks up and he says,
you are
Jewish?
And I said, I am not recruitable.
And he stopped.
And afterwards, my boss said, yeah, you're not
gonna brief the Israelis anymore.
And so I didn't. I never spoke to
them again. Now, once I got overseas,
again, I was I was,
declared to so many services, and I was
working in counterterrorism. And that's where you really
want there to be lots and lots of
cooperation.
So,
we would get calls,
you know, from
this country, and that country, and the other
country, and
we rarely said no. Well, I can tell
you from firsthand experience, when it came time
to work with the Palestinians,
I'm hard pressed to think of of a
group of people who were more committed to
counterterrorism,
to to peace. I mean, it was revelatory
for me. It was it was
a group of people who wanted to do
the right thing, they wanted good relations, they
wanted progress for their people,
they wanted to have a role in the
international community, and it was a joy to
work with them.
You know, that was in that was between
1998 and 2000, and I thought, wow, that
was really great. I wonder if that was
an anomaly. And then I went to Pakistan
in 2,002
as the chief of counterterrorism
operations.
And it got to the point where
the Palestinians
would would
come to the embassy, and they would just
wave them in. Come on in. Because they
belonged there. We were partners.
We were a team.
That was the case at the CIA and
it was also the case at the state
department.
Now this note that I wrote to myself,
to be sure to explain the dichotomy,
is that it was exactly the opposite at
the White House and on Capitol Hill.
Because
we didn't have to answer to voters
at the CIA.
Right?
I don't care
what, you know, APAC
says about me if I'm at the CIA.
I don't care. I have a job to
do.
And I was
I was bound to do it. The state
department was the same way. The state department
was often criticized for something called clientitis.
You know, you hear this a lot at
the state department, that
people go to Israel and they and they
serve for a couple of years, and then
they come out,
like, really disliking Israelis and really loving Palestinians.
And then they say, okay. Well, then you
need to go
to Berlin for a couple of years to
cool off. We
we can't have all these Arab lovers in
the
well, it turns out that the whole state
department loves
loves Arabs.
It's just a completely different world. It's hard
to describe. And then you go to the
White House, especially to the National Security Council,
to work with those people who who have
these fancy titles of senior assistant to the
president for such and such affairs and assistant
to the president, and you say this is
the way things should be in our policy
on, you know, the Levant or the Maghreb
or whatever it is, and they don't wanna
hear it because you like Arabs too much.
Well,
with that said,
we all just
accepted it.
And frankly,
we all believed that we were right and
the White House was wrong. Capitol Hill, forget
it. It's a lost cause.
You know, on Capitol Hill, when we were
summoned to give briefings,
we would get in the car with somebody
from the Office of Congressional Affairs, and
they would always tell us before we walked
into the the, founded
the
So an Israeli intelligence guy forms this company
and says we're gonna take care of American
hospitals,
dams, water infrastructure. Dams come later, but it
was First Health Infrastructure,
and they partnered with CISA
that's supposed to protect critical structure, including election
infrastructure, but also things like water systems, the
power grid, all sorts of things like that
as well as hospitals. And beyond that, it's
not just hospitals anymore. As you mentioned, it's
expanded to dams, it's expanded to water systems,
and also nuclear reactors in the United States.
So you have a foreign intelligence
founded nonprofit
being offered
access to all of these critical systems in
the United States. How is this?