As the world watches and listens in horror,
the peaceful pro democracy demonstration in China comes
to a violent and bloody end. Mister Gorbachev,
tear down this wall.
Wolves
hiding nearby
with friend
do or die
around
me.
There is another very important phase of warfare.
It has as its target
not the body,
but the mind of the enemy.
The target of psychological warfare
is against the enemy's mind.
It is words and ideas. Ammunition
used by a firewall.
Its mission is to influence the thoughts of
the enemy soldiers. And at the same time,
is expected and encouraged to study foreign languages
and the social sciences such as history,
economics, and sociology. They're perpendicular. He must have
a broad and sympathetic
understanding of all phases of human experience.
Gripping
in at my skin.
The walls
of night close in.
But the use of this force as an
integral part of combat
has now taken on new form.
These are the SciWar soldiers.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Wednesday,
January 8, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today. Now you've
you've seen that video more than once. I've
played that on this show
probably 3 or 2 or 3 times.
And, obviously, the the point is clear. I
mean, if you missed it at the end,
that's produced by the army. That's in a
US military production.
Openly talking about something that in other contexts,
other conversations,
in some cases, just broadly disregarded as absolutely
not true. In other ways, kind of, you
know,
shoved to the side as sort of conspiratorial,
but not really addressed. The reality being that
your government and this isn't a secret. Most
people who are even somewhat engaged in this
conversation are very aware that psychological
operations are an a, I mean, have been
for a very long time and a huge
part of foreign policy, of domestic policy. And,
again, think and hear that importantly, not just
about other bad guy elements that, you know,
the narratives around it, but focused on you
and your perception of the government whether or
not you're on one side or the other.
But in the
it's hard to put an exact point on.
I the point is right now,
we all feel like this is getting crazy.
And that's not just an opinion. It's being
talked about pretty openly right now. But what
I was gonna say is that over you
know, you could decide when I think we
saw sort of an a rapid
incline in this, at least as we saw
it. And you can align that with sort
of the technological direction that we're going in.
And I think that's all will be a
huge part of what we're being conditioned to
accept right now using those kind of things.
But I started with that for a reason
because a large part of what we're gonna
talk about today has to do with that
exact point, but more so as I wanna
frame it I mean, specifically psychological operations and
everything that means, but a specific point today
around partisan misrepresentation.
And you guys know exactly what I mean
by that. If you don't, we're gonna see
it in space today. And any other day,
you wanna look at any social media platform.
You might not even know you're looking at
it, and it's literally everywhere. Or I shouldn't
say literally, but everywhere.
And the point is that we have it's
and I think it's part of the same
conversation. But you have elements of the,
as I call it, team sport politics side
of the of the two sides
deliberately right now misrepresenting old stories, new stories,
and everything in between
in order to kick you to get you
into a very specific mental spot. And like
we saw we saw with Elon Musk, a
very, you know,
clumsy and obvious example of the kind of
lurch over to this conversation as everyone's highlighting
as Myron gains pointed out the we all
see what you're doing, Elon. You're shifting into
another conversation whether real or important, which they
are or not, a deviation from what was
going on.
We're seeing it a lot of other subtle
ways as well. Highlighting topics
that that are
half the story, making it only about Democrats,
for example. Like, I I don't need to
go through it all. You're gonna see it
a lot today. But that opening clip,
I just want you to think about what
that means
in regard to your government aiming well, you
and the world and everything else and the
extent that the the effort the the the
extent they would go to
in order to, let's say,
I don't know, achieve achieve what they argue
is a national security imperative, and maybe even
the people conducting this may actually believe that
it's in your interest or the interest of
Americans. And if they're under that belief, and
my point being in most cases, I think
we're not actually doing that, what extent do
you think they would go to? Would they
lie to you in the media?
Would they
plant people inside of protests?
Would they carry out fake protests? Would they
carry out fake demonstrations?
Would they go as far as to carry
out fake events in order to convince you
of certain things?
Totally not. Violent, of course, or maybe they
would go that far. Let me see. Historically,
do we have examples of that?
If you don't know that we have
I mean,
it's actually kinda crazy today. That's kinda one
of the where I was get going with
the overlap of these conversations. That we're at
a point now where we have so much
verifiable information, whether it's around foreign governments and
what they've always been and what they're conducting
today, whether it's around what this government has
been involved in, what groups they've created, like,
tangible, real world, whistle blowing, documents from the
government, like, over the top evidence around these
things today, and yet we still have to
have these debates, which is kinda what we're
get this this weird quasi kind of, like,
the I I the way I guess I
would describe it is us bumping up against
what I see as the controlled kind of
area of this partisan conversation that is immovable,
that does not care about the truth. That's
what I call team sport politics. But the
video we're pointing out to start with today
is about how this whole, like, engine keeps
this thing moving even as I think it
starts to fall apart.
And, again, the main point, I played it
today, is we're gonna end I just shouldn't
say it again. I didn't say it yet,
but we're gonna end today with the video
that's a new version, which is interesting because
the first one that came out was, I
don't know, what was it, like, a year
ago or more?
It's it's I mean, if you haven't seen
it before, it's unnerving,
with the guys in the background with white
masks. Like, it's it's meant to be alarming,
like like, unnerving, scary almost. But, of course,
you know, aimed at the bad guys, even
though they'll tell you that's not the reality
when, of course, they see domestic terrorism or,
you know, whatever they wanna frame it as
as a threat. And you could look at
their own documentation over, I don't know, like,
even the last 20 years, and they'll repeatedly
highlight that the new threat coming is gonna
be domestic. And, I mean, Americans. And they're
they've highlighted this. And so now they come
up with another one,
which I just think is very important to
think about why that would be the case.
What's the interest of the army wanting you
to see that?
You guys could think for yourself on it,
but we'll end with that today. Now, today,
we're gonna go through that very point in
a large span of conversation. The idea of
partisan misrepresentation, psychological operations,
5th generation warfare, all of these are just
part of the same conversation.
And we're gonna start with a point around
a little bit of technological stuff that I
wanted to highlight that overlaps with everything today,
but has to do with Elon, Twitter,
specifically Technocracy stuff around an an alarming report
about,
hybrid biological
robots, like, weird stuff. I just wanna keep
you abreast of where this seems to be
rapidly going. But we're gonna talk about Israel
to start because I definitely think that I
just wanna make sure that we're not losing
sight of what's going on that is not
even remotely slowing down. And, of course, I
know you guys are well aware of this,
so I tend I've been tending to put
that on the backside of the show, but
today, we're gonna start with that for the
most part. A huge part about what's really
going on there that it's sadly sad to
say, worse than it's been. I mean, it's
just disgusting, the stuff that we're seeing, and
only because it's becoming
I guess that even would be exponentially more
obvious.
Every day, we're getting not just evidence that
it's happening, but now we're getting IDF members
openly admitting what they're doing, or Harrat's writing
about how the government's talking about ethnically cleansing,
like, on the surface of the conversation. And
still, these western cowards in the media and
the government just absolutely disregard it. Again, you
have to highlight what that's or recognize what
that shows you.
They know you see this, and they're still
backing it. Blackmail,
occupation,
or they're literally a part of that agenda.
I mean, I don't know how else we
we make sense of this or how else
we have America Firsters out there pretending that's
not obviously
against that agenda. But we're gonna go through
all of that as it relates to the
bigger conversation as well as as it folds
into what's going on in the government that
we're about to see roll in. And how
this interesting conversation around Panama, Greenland,
what was the other one?
The Gulf of Mexico, and even now with
the UK conversation. Maybe they knew need need
new leadership.
It's interesting.
We're gonna have the conversation around the this
weird game about where we're you're being trolled,
except it's kind of real. We want it
to be, and now we're rolling out policy.
But if it looks bad, you're still being
played. It's all a big game. Maybe it
is. Either way, there's still real world consequences.
And the most important part about whether or
not it's happening the way that it looks
like it is, that they're just gonna kind
of
force this in, whatever that even means, the
important part to me, whether it even happens
or not, is how transparently this is what
the
conservatives, the honest movement out there believe this
is fighting.
What the the movement they're a part of.
And, again, I think a lot of honest
people mostly are in this movement, not the
leadership element, but people that believe they're fighting
for the best centers of this country. And,
you know, maybe I would disagree on how
they see that playing out. My point is
their in their intent is what they believe
is best for this country. And I think
the the interesting part is 30 seconds ago,
as a lot of conservatives are calling out,
we were talking about all this as the
problem, the future, the great reset, the globalism.
I mean, interestingly enough, I'm sure you can
think of one of the characters out there
screaming about globalism almost as a way to
not talk about Israel. And now that we
have the most obvious example of this beginning
to become clear,
weird how that's not being discussed. In fact,
it's being called the solution.
And we're talking about the expansion, the global
the the annexation or whatever you wanna call
it, Greenland, of Mexico, of this whole thing
they're talking about. Now you have to understand
that that is imperialism. It's naked imperialism. No
matter what you make this conversation out to
be, the people that were, like these libertarians,
talking about these principles are suddenly ignoring how
contradictory this is to what they thought they
were fighting for. And on top of that,
that it is the same as globalism, or
rather the intersection is very clear. And we're
gonna go through this today because it's hilarious
to me to con the the usual, like,
1 or 2, 3 kind of regurgitated talking
points that you get 75 times repeated in
the chats when you put these things out
there. And I'll go through the main points
and address why I think it's interesting that
they're
missing the point. But the idea being that
imperialism or the expansion of territory is one
element of what we're talking about. It's also
cultural. It's also political. But really, just the
idea of one element
and one control structure.
And even just one government taking more area
could you could argue that's not what they
intended it for it to be in the
long term, but it still is expansion of
more territory controlled by one entity. So I
don't really get why it's difficult for people
other than for, you know, political, I don't
wanna see what we're looking at here. It's
quite obvious what this is. Now we're also
gonna talk about a couple of things on
the latter half of the show that I
think are important, but we'll get into all
that. And I think
today, again, the partisan misrepresentation of all this
for not just that we're using it to
distract you, but like the Greenland example, literally
doing what they
have what what they claim they're fighting. I
mean, it's as simple as that. Where the
rebel outsider fight in the deep state as
we're we're working with every single element. I
mean, you name it right now. If you
go back to the COVID 19 peak
of what the republicans were calling out as
the great reset and everything else, you go
down the checkbox list. Every single one of
those things are represented with what they're putting
forward right now. Different names, different flavors,
same outcome.
I hope I'm wrong, but let's get into
it. So I wanna start with something that's
about,
that we're not gonna get into today,
But it's saying the partisan misrepresentation,
we're gonna start with this point because of
something that I just talked about recently. And
this is about the COVID 19 medical health
kind of overlap. In in if not tomorrow
or the one of the very next shows,
we're gonna get into this topic more because
as I'll briefly show you in a second,
it is beginning to bubble back up as
we've been seeing. Mask mandates seem to be
kinda floating up here and there, largely California,
but it is happening. We saw this weird
article from the Daily Mail just like last
time about people falling in China and, you
know, it's we're always on guard, we should
be, to what these things are beginning to
outline.
Maybe it's just them hoping we jump at
shadows. But either way, it's important to remember
that what we went through and that really
it hasn't stopped. And that my problem is
that a lot of the people pretending they're
fighting this very animal are in line with
the people that made it happen, and that
worries me. But I wanted to play this
because it's a great clip from doctor David
Martin. I'll I'll I should grab my interview
with him, which I thought was important. Whatever
your thoughts on his opinions, if you, you
know, think he's misled here or there, my
gut tells me this person genuinely is calling
this out And and, really, in a way
that is
problematic for the power structure, which is why
I don't think think he's I mean, I
see him as largely nonpartisan in all this,
especially with the way we had the interview.
I think it was very important. And then
I saw Alex Jones interview him recently. And,
of course, the framing all was about the
bad guy democrats and how this was all
that one side narrative. And remember remember what
I said when I when I highlighted it?
I said David Martin is being, in my
opinion, aggressively misrepresented.
Because the reality is if you listen to
him right here or any other time he
talks about it in a non controlled setting,
it's clear that what he's highlighting is this
was ongoing, being built during Trump's administration through
to Biden's administration. So you can't pretend like
this is a one side thing, especially since
Trump continues to support all of it.
Warp speed, injections, which I just still cannot
understand why an honest person out there would
not how you can get past that.
And let other than some abstract idea of
a thing you don't know or some 40
chess move, which, again, that's that's just wishful
thinking. I get why you might want to
do that, but you gotta be honest with
yourself. Now listen to this clip because this
is, doctor Jane Ruby is sharing this. It
says Vivek,
Pharmaswami, she calls him, to run the new
department of government deficiency. He's already made 1,000,000,000
on the mRNA bioweapon. Think he's got your,
interest in mind? So here's what David Martin
had to say in in a discussion about
the the large point that I think is,
at least in many ways right now, trying
to be slanted towards one side versus the
other, when the truth is, as everything we
talk about, it's just your government.
And they would love it if you choose
to only focus on one side of it
and make that about people instead of the
government itself.
So all of this fight
about who is going to win the horse
race to get to the vaccine
was happening
a year, 2 years before the pandemic.
So we didn't even have to guess who
the winner was gonna be. We knew that
Moderna and BioNTech were the inside runners. We
knew they were going to get the contracts
from what ultimately became operation warp speed.
Hey. And do you remember, by the way,
on a side note, do you remember that?
It I'm I think this was like the
1st month of this conversation or maybe the
so many months. Do you remember what we
were talking about? The same thing he's pointing
to. The reality that and a lot of
us were talking about at the time. Fauci
and people at his at the NIA disc
background had money in vet they had patents
where they were making money with the Moderna.
We we were like, well, look at that.
Gee, I wonder which one's gonna be the
focal point. Right?
But looking back, it's amazing how much we
were calling out, a lot of us, early
before a lot of these so called experts
and mainstream alternative media partisan maniacs were out
there blindly looking around it until finally it
was safe to talk about. Just wanna remember
that. And it was my point was Pfizer.
Moderna was the one because of the money.
I still think Pfizer is more of a
focal point maybe because of that, but we
have to realize that the Moderna kind of
vehicle
is what he's highlighting, and I agree with
that. That's the Bob Langer aspect of it.
He's the scientific cofounder of Moderna and where
it goes forward in the future. But I
just want to remember that. I thought that
was interesting to think about.
We knew they were going to get the
contracts
from what ultimately became operation warp speed. These
were things that were foregone conclusions, and you
knew who the people were because they were
already fighting
over who was gonna win.
So they
So that means before
2019, 2020. Okay? So that means under behind
this from 2016
forward
and all these things we're talking about, this
is all during Trump's administration. It's not about
just trying to make it about Trump. It's
simply to highlight that it's not about one
person or one group. It is about your
government, regardless of what ID log stands in
front of it, is continuing this program.
Maybe Trump doesn't even know that. It's not
about making it about him. It's about recognizing
that left or right, it's the same agenda.
That's what I'm so importantly trying to get
through to people right now. And, really, I
think more than I've ever seen, it's starting
to shift.
Lied to congress about the patents that the
CDC,
NIH,
and its funded entities had. They lied to
congress about whether they had a relationship with
Acuitas and Arbutus, which conveniently are Canadian firms,
which made nothing but
copious
copious copious profits
on the back of, I don't know, a
thing that accidentally came into being. And by
the way, we have a presidential candidate, Vivek,
right now,
is the guy who funded
Arbutus and Acuitas.
So we have a Republican candidate for president
who is using
for his campaign
money he made
on his
not so publicly disclosed interest in every shot
that was delivered.
Yeah. Well, there's another example for the whole
ethics overlap that no one seems to wanna
talk about probably because your government as a
whole doesn't really want you talking about that.
Right? Now if we consider the whole Democrat
Republican fighting each other illusion,
well, then really that wouldn't make sense, would
it? Because they would go out of their
way to call out anything that would hinder
Trump's but that's not happening.
On top of the fact that that that
Ramaswami is literally part of his administration. You
don't think David Martin would call that out?
Like, it makes you wonder what part of
those conversations he had with them were not
included in the interview that was played out
loud.
I wonder how that would play if, I
don't know, somebody at a town hall
would ask an inconvenient question like, hey, Vivek.
Tell us about the money you made on
the back of Arbutus and Acuitas Pharmaceuticals. Why
don't we actually have that conversation? Right. But
we don't have that conversation because the public
is, number 1, uninformed. And when it is
informed,
they are too incredulous to believe that the
things I just said happened to be true.
Well, really, my point is that that's the
case.
But specifically, when it come like, so the
you know, the democrats would be all more
than willing to to believe something like that
about their adversary and vice versa, the team's
sports sides. But he's right though because it
ultimately amounts to no change because, well, if
you make it about the republican side, right
now they're they're in too incredible. They can
that couldn't be the case. Right?
It works. It's worked for a very long
time.
Doctor David Martin, the COVID illusion, and the
Criminal World Health Organization driving it. I'll include
that interview for you to check out. And
then this is just the inside paper. We're
gonna come back to talk about this more
because, of course, we're gonna have to go
right back to that stupid hill on the
mass conversation
that we, I guess, died on, if you
will, for the, you know, the the, analogy
or the the metaphor. But we didn't do
that because we definitely were very rapidly proven
right even though we were screaming about this
in 2020. One of the earliest elements in
this conversation, one of the earliest platforms as
far as I can tell, making a very
clear argument. These masks were not statistically
significant reducing transmission. You guys know that. You
know how much pushback we got until suddenly
Lena Nguyen and what's his name from the
other side, all at the same moment decided
to go, guess what? Clock masks don't work.
Wow. We now find that out even though
we knew that because the science was saying
that long before 2020, and it still does.
Weird how what we were showing you became
the reality and later you know, just it's
such a clearly controlled manipulation.
My point though is that even though we
were proven spectacularly
right on that point, we still get called
conspiracy theorists by the same people because that's
how partisan games work. Both ways. But the
point is, new face mask mandates, face mask,
can't talk, mandates
return in multiple US states as doctors warn
of quaDemic.
It's just a cartoon.
First, it was, you know, what was it?
Bi, tr
by demic, tridemic, you know, they kept increasing,
and now it's quademic.
It's just so and and when's the last
time any one of those even happened? They
love to hype that, and then, well, it
just ends up kind of fizzing.
It's just funny to me. We'll go into
this more. It's just so crazy how obvious
this is about trying to keep you on
your toes. Always worried about the next thing
just so I can use that fear and
then possibly something larger. But we'll come back
to that more in a future conversation. So
let's get into the 5th generation
warfare.
This was the art the show we did
on the on the second, drone fog, false
flags, and political destabilization.
Now this, guys, is just a general overview.
Make sure you watch this because I think
it's important to see how I think all
this is very clearly connected.
But just keeping this in your mind. Again,
the partisan misrepresentation,
but the idea of what 5th generation warfare
truly
embodies.
And we're talking psychological operations, false groups,
in you know, like, inter like, this but
also the
internal stuff. Like, the worry I have about
the actual manipulation, the neuro weapons, the neuroscience,
the nanotechnology. These are not false conversations despite
most of the mainstream conversations still
disregarding it. You know, but let's forget let's
not forget the same way that that mainstream
conversation for decades has disregarded the fluoride risk,
disregarded the geoengineering risk, disregarded every single thing
we're now very clearly showing is real. So
that is how that controlled situation works. It's
always fun to be able to act like
you're in the know and kick away things
that don't line up with what you want
to believe. That's partisanship. That's just part of
the mainstream conversation.
But keeping all that in mind, we're gonna
go through the conversation right now of,
well, really, the first of some technological stuff.
But other than that, the larger point today
is just this constant game with the with
the
online social media aspect, the censorship that's been
happening, the random
deviation to one focal point in the UK
to get us ignoring the reality of what
this is showing you, and how that is
then kind of cascading into the same old
agenda. Immigrants bad. Islam coming for your children.
You know, ultimately, then that being rolled into
what? More surveillance, more biometric control, less privacy,
less liberty, all the same things. A removal
of your constitutional rights even though that is
not technically possible. They can disregard them.
But this is where we're going.
The now now we need to deport even
I mean, deportation. That's this is the focal
point, which we all should know. Even if
you believe in to a t that everything
they're calling for needs to be done, it
will still be used to advance that agenda
as they're making clear.
As if this was Biden doing it, every
Republican in the world would be calling out.
But Charlie Kirk,
posting a rally,
which is another Palestinian rally that's been going
on since October 7th, where they're protesting for
the end of the genocide. Right? Now he
takes on the back of what we now
should very rapidly begin to see, you know,
have a couple points of this next, the
whole
dual psychological event that happened. New Orleans, Las
Vegas. Right? This both same
same fort, same, you know, Fort Bragg,
same company rented from, the same type of
electric car. I mean, the and every angle
of it seems to be imploding with a
1,000 different inconsistencies.
Maybe that's by design. Either way,
ISIS flag and all of the usual suspects
just double down on the clumsy narrative that
they put on top of it.
It's a jihadist Islamist ISIS attack, but except
that literally makes no sense outside of the
narrative that, guess what, the mainstream puts on
it. So isn't it funny that the Joneses
and Kirks of the world are the ones
that are buying at face value, the corporate
media narrative? Yeah. Make sure you pay attention
to how weird that is, but really understand
that it's not that weird when you know
what's going on. But it says, remember how
Hamas, he says, attacked Israel,
massacred 1200 innocent civilians? Okay. So see how
dishonest these people are? So let's just break
just that first sentence down and realize that
1200
were even if you take that number, which
has already been rolled back to, what, like,
11, 10, a 1000 something, according to Israel.
But they they've stuck with the 1200 because
it's easy. But even then, Israel's already admitted
that whether it was 1200 or not, it
was not even remotely all innocent civilians. The
vast majority were IDF members, people who were
actively
in our IDF positions.
Right? Okay. So that changes that a lot.
But on top of that, let's also not
forget that more than half of them were
killed by the Hannibal directive that we can
literally
prove according to Horetz, according to IDF generals,
according to Israeli media and their government themselves.
They ordered it. It's now verifiable.
But Kirk doesn't care about any of that
because it's about using these things that most
people who he's talking to barely even looked
into this. They've been going off his stated
narrative and what Netanyahu says from the very
beginning because that's the kind of audience you
get in the partisan media
and that you end up falling into this
and thinking, oh my gosh. They killed innocent
people. They're all jihadists maniacs and the and
they're down there cheering for it because that's
what Kirk said.
Simple. Right? Except that's ridiculous and absolutely false.
The point is, you know, is Israel very
clearly whatever you think about whether they were
aware of this coming, that's a whole conversation
that we need to still have and have
had,
wasn't 1200. Most of them killed by Israel
themselves, and they've continued to do so. And
most of the people that have come back
have continued to admit that's what actually happened.
Then he goes on to say, and then
the Muslim world rallied behind the murderers.
Oh, is that what we remember? Or do
you remember Palestinians
cheering for a finally having somebody fight back
against the illegal occupation, which was a legally
protected act according to the international law, Fort
Geneva Convention,
the armed resistance.
You know? But he didn't. I guarantee he's
heard all these. I guarantee he's not stupid
enough to think that that doesn't make sense.
He just doesn't care because they have an
agenda.
Did all the Muslim world stand up and
go, yay. We hate Jews. No. They didn't.
That's the stupid, clumsy, false narrative they've jammed
in front of you because they have an
agenda. It says America just suffered a jihadist
attack. Oh, really? You mean because there's an
ISIS flag on the back of a military
personnel that works for the United States that
they probably
I mean, it's just ridiculous.
If this was anything on the side of
something that they wanna be critical about, they
would be tearing this apart. But because it's
something they want to lean into, despite how
rapidly it fell apart and a couple of
CIA agents telling you to believe it, well,
it's all good. Right? Because jihad bad. Or
rather, Islam bad is the point.
But it's saying an Islamist attack. Like, they're
just holding on to that.
Dozens are dead and injured, and now a
pro Palestinian protest is blocking 6th Avenue. Oh,
because they're connected?
Because they're out there going, yes. We're happy
with what happened in Las Vegas. No. You
moron. You liar. They are out there chanting
for Palestine.
But because you pretend they're all connected, even
though they're not, it's just a lazy connection.
Rallying behind the murderers. He's literally trying to
tell you they're out there cheering on behalf
of what happened in New Orleans and Las
Vegas. They're not. It says this perverse upside
down world only ends when we stop importing
cultures that hate us.
That's it. It all
swing it all back around to immigration.
Right? And that the brown bad. They hate
us, so nobody's allowed. So this is racism,
guys. It doesn't matter whether there are people
over there that hate us. The point is
not every person that is in a certain
culture hates this.
The Americans. Most of the ones that even
hate hate the government,
so too do a lot of Americans.
And guess what? Charlie Kirk hates part of
it. That's the democrat side. So guess what?
You're not too different. But the problem is
he wants to make it about all brown
people hate us because whatever narrative fill in
the blank. And it says, and deport those
already who were who reject our values. Okay.
So now he wants you to deport people
who just don't agree with your cultural values.
Do you know what that is a category
of? Globalism.
We'll get there.
Because it's not just about occupation, not just
about political control. It's about forcing your political
and cultural ideology
on other people. You're gonna begin to see
how obvious it is that American foreign policy
is basically globalism. But we don't like to
call it that. It's about freedom and liberty
as we murder and steal and rob and
take things from everybody we want.
Cultures that hate us and deport those already
here who reject our values and embrace a
backward culture of terrorism and death. So, otherwise,
people that believe Palestinian should not be occupied
believe in terrorism and death because that's the
lazy narrative that Netanyahu and Charlie Kirk want
you to believe.
Meanwhile, we need leadership that possesses the moral
clarity to stop fighting useless foreign wars and
instead preserve our way of life. Well, finally,
we get to a point that somebody could
possibly agree with, except none of you are
doing that. Every single thing they're rolling out
is war war with Iran, continuation of genocide
with Israel, continuation of occupying Syria, continuation of
the war against anybody that Israel doesn't like.
Now maybe I overestimate his intelligence because quite
frankly, I would say he's not stupid enough
to be able to believe what he's writing,
but, you know, who knows? January 20th can't
come fast enough. Right? Because it's gonna on
a dime, suddenly, all those things will roll
out.
Guys, these are people playing you.
It needs to become clear. Now the Trump
deportation dynamic,
as raw as we covered on 18th,
Trump confirms plan to declare national emergency for
mass deportations using military assets.
The idea that we don't already have a
big issue with declaring a national emergency and
potentially using military assets from not just the
National Guard, as he said himself, which would
be a direct violation of Passi Comitatus, but
who cares? Because they don't seem to care
about anything other than what they wanna achieve.
That's not alarming to anybody after we what
we just saw?
It is because a lot of conservatives are
calling it out, but not the TeamSport politics
side. But so this overlaps with the main
point of creating a situation where you then
have,
I mean, this will be unlawless. This will
be rampant lawlessness. You will have people, as
we've already begun to see, by the way.
I'm already seeing things start to happen where
people are I think it was a report
from ICE basically saying they're already starting to
round people up. They're already starting to profile.
I mean, it's happening all over the place
before he's even in power.
And the reality is, how in the world
do you think they're mapping that out? If
they already knew they were illegal and had
a list, they would have arrested them. So
that means they're going after people that they
suspect.
So what? Brown people? I mean, how do
you actually think this is gonna play out
around the country? And then, of course, the
reality which we're gonna get into next is
a massive conflict of interest, a la ethics
pledge not signed, remember, which shows you that
he has a lot of money to make
because he's already gotten he basically, he's been
what is it? I got it right here.
$1,000,000
has been donated, which is not gigantic in
the context of what he's been getting. You
know, like, a 100,000,000 from Israel and Adelson.
But the reality being
that a $1,000,000 has come into his campaign
before he was elected from a group called
GEO Private. It's a private prison firm.
And now they seem to have potentially an
exclusive contract for
building out their system to be able to
hold what they're going to deal with.
Doesn't that seem like an awesome like a
huge conflict of interest? It is. Period.
Regardless of what anybody would try to deflect
to. So he's now gonna be rolling this
out.
Wall Street Ape shares this video of somebody.
Great. You can listen to it for yourself.
He has an actual recording of the GEO
CEO
on this saying, we were made for this.
This is gonna change everything.
The point is he's playing this like huge.
This proves Donald Trump has gotta do it,
which is just even Derek responded this going,
moron, this is not even remotely a good
thing. But the point is, as Josette points
out, in the months leading up to election
day, the nation's largest
prison private prison company, which by the way
the fact that we even have private private
prison companies is grotesque.
It it literally makes a profit motive to
make keep people in jail to increase recidivism,
the opposite of what these things are supposed
to be doing. And it says, poured a
$1,000,000 into a super PAC supporting former president
Trump. The donations from GEO Group were far
from the largest corporate comp contributions
to Trump's war chest. But it says during
a recent corporate earnings call, which you you
can listen to up top, g o for
group CEO, Brian Evans, estimates that his company
could make as much as 400,000,000
a year just by having this contract.
So my point is obvious that this is
a conflict of interest, and now you could
even argue that that might be embellished or
leaned into even more because, well, he owes
them. And you know that's how politics works.
And if you don't wanna admit that, then
you're being dishonest for partisan reasons. I'm not
saying that is going to happen, but, obviously,
that opens the door for a potential conflict
of interest, or it is a conflict of
interest, and it could open the door for
abuse, which is supposed to matter.
Here's the article itself. It says the donations
from GEO Group were far from the largest,
that's what we were saying earlier, but few
industries are set to benefit from the incoming
Trump administration as significantly
as private prisons, which is not just the
GEO Group, which are expected to surge in
business driven by Trump's plan to deport millions
of undocumented immigrants.
During a recent corporate earnings call, GEO Group
CEO,
Brian Evans estimated they can make 400,000,000
by filling empty and underutilized
beds at existing detention facilities to support what
he called the future needs for ICE and
the federal government. Now what we're gonna get
into next is Derek's recent article about how
ICE has contracts right now with Paragon
Solutions, which is an Israeli spyware firm. And
it's super problematic for how they're gonna be
using all the technology they utilize right now
to go after this group. Now you have
to at least ask whether that is a
means to an end to get this rapidly
rolled out like everything else the Israeli government
is seeding across this country. Rapidly rolled out
like everything else the Israeli government is seeding
across this country.
It says referring to the US Immigration and
Customs Enforcement Agency. Now it says investors appear
to have noted,
noticed with the company's stock price jumping
more than 80% since the beginning of the
month. You see how crazy that is? 80%
is a massive amount of money just because
of this. Because of where this goes, because
people who are in the inside, they already
know. This company is going explode because they
have a contract to be able to house
all this. Now realize they're probably just gonna
be,
facilitating this by getting other groups underneath them.
But it's gonna this is gonna be a
massive boon for this company. And I find
that to be a massive conflict of interest.
I think that was it.
Now here's what Whitney Webb says about the
same point, that cheerleading for expanding private prisons
and biometrics
among the so called dissident right on this
site is unnerving. That's the one that's again
one of the general things of today with
the partisan misrepresentation.
But think about this.
How is it possible that we cannot notice
that we have people who were just calling
this stuff out? Like, biometric scans in general.
Palm scans and, you know, the great reset.
All the things because of COVID they were
feigning. We need this because dangerous drought dangerous,
you know, pathogens.
Right?
And everyone said, absolutely not. This is a
ploy. This is a scam. They're trying to
trick you into the great reset. Okay. Now
here we go 30 seconds later, and they
go, we need it because bad guy immigrants.
And we go, okay. Let's do it.
I mean, really? Like, even if Trump doesn't
know what he's doing, can't you connect the
dots? Can't you see that this still opens
the door to the same program?
I know you can. I'm asking why conservatives
out there who can see it are not
calling it out more.
I know a lot of you are, and
I've been praising the hell out of you
because it's integrity. And it's probably hard because
of how many people are gonna fight back
at you just because you point out the
truth, which shows you a lot about what
side or or what the partisans in general.
But she says, if you think this expansion
of the police state is just going to
be for illegal immigrants,
you've ignored the last 40 years of American
history.
God. I just don't know why people can't
engage with this. It's important right now. Now
I'm gonna include some articles.
Remember, this is from Derek from 2020.
December 31, 2020. And what this shows you
is this was not just this new admit
like, it shows you 2 things. It's not
unique to Trump, and it's also
a continuation
through left and right because we just have
one government, guys.
The Trump admin is setting the stage for
a Biden surveillance state
because they did. They handed off the baton
beautifully. And guess what? Trump and Biden carried
it out through the COVID 19 illusion, and
now they're handing the baton right back with,
guess what, I don't see any weird deviations.
I don't see them planning to try to
stop Trump from getting into power despite all
the hype from one person.
Maybe it's gonna happen and it wouldn't surprise
me. But right now, seems to be like
they're just going, go ahead, Trump. Take it
away.
Why isn't that alarming to people who think
that they're gonna do whatever they can to
stop him because Trump the Democrats versus Republicans?
The reality is they work with each other
back and forth. And right now, it's all
about controlling you.
Always has been. That's just for the 20th
of 20 24. Federal government watchdog warned the
DHS surveils Americans without a warrant using more
than 20 technologies. So guess what? Add biometric
scans to that. Add what Rand Paul was
just telling you because of the drone overlap
that nobody seems to cock talk about on
the right, which is that they were just
telling you because of the drone discussion and
the forcing in of the drone legislation that
they're talking about using these drones to scan
and sweep up information off your phone.
Right? Because that'll help them fight the bad
guy drones. Right?
Guy, that's just so transparent.
So you add the part they're already doing
this. What they're trying to force through is
a what Catherine calls the control grid that's
coming, which I think is pretty much already
here.
And not just on earth, as you already
know. As Derek has covered, Elon's
SpaceX is helping the NRO, the US intelligence
agencies currently being controlled by Biden, so make
sense of that for me, to build out
the spy satellite network, the largest one that's
ever been seen. The guy from the NRO
literally says a quote, now you can't hide
because you're constantly looked
at. And says, well, e artificial intelligence is
necessary. Elon's gonna help us do that. That's
directly from the conversation.
But that's totally not the same thing. Right?
That's the good guy version.
I just don't know why you people fall
for that.
We also had an interview with Whitney Webb
in April, manufacturing bipartisan consent for biometric surveillance.
This is exactly where we are right now.
Now, so, Catherine Austin Fitts highlights what Donald
Trump said. This is on the 5th January.
He says, members of congress and don't forget.
He just tweeted,
time for the CIA to get involved.
If you needed one thing to push you
over the edge, I don't know how that's
not it. But he says members of government
of congress are getting to work on one
powerful bill that will bring our country back
because that's always how it works. Right? Just
one vote, one bill, and everything's back on
track. As usual, they want you to think
that. But it says, and make it greater
than ever before.
I thought it was great again. But, anyway,
it says we must secure the border.
Same thing we're talking about. That includes everything
we just discussed. Unleash American energy, which I
guarantee is going to mean forcing contracts and
control basically,
imperialism.
Right? Like, the Nord Stream pipeline dynamic or
forcing places in Africa to take what they
want at a worse deal for less outcome
even though other places are getting a better
deal, but America forces it in. That's how
they do that. Now maybe Trump's gonna do
differently. I hope he does. And if he
does, I'll praise him for it, but I
doubt it.
And renew the Trump tax cuts,
which were the largest in history, but we
make it even better. No tax on tips,
which yeah. If this goes the way he
says it,
well, I mean, there's always usually a story
around that. But, yeah, if the good things
should be praised if and when they happen.
Just like I did in the last administration,
there are plenty of things that I pointed
out that I thought were good. But we
shouldn't be praising him on words that have
yet to come to pass. That's just ridiculous.
And it says, it will all be made
with tariffs, which of course is the problem.
See, that's the point. That's not how that
works. That is a tax on you. So
if he's gonna lower if he's gonna say,
no tax on tips and lower this and
this, well, that ends up making you pay
more for the things that you need to
get.
And it may not immediately translate. Maybe the
tariff isn't something else. It doesn't apply to
what you the bottom line is, in a
long sense, you will pay more for something,
so it basically is a wash. They know
that.
But it says, and much more from countries
that have taken advantage of the US. Some
more imperialist and more strong arming. And it
says Republicans must unite and quickly deliver these
historic victories to the American people. Get smart,
tough, and blah blah blah. Make America great.
And simply she sees right through it
and says, dear congress and POTUS, do not,
I repeat, do not dare to stick with
us with a digital ID or digital control
grid. That's all that really amounts to. If
you read between the lines, that is what
is coming, and they're screaming it forward.
Now just a quick side note as I
said because it's not the bigger conversation today.
But I just want you to think about
how weird this is. So every single checkbox
of a box to check for the great
reset,
Elon Musk is rolling out. I played the
clip a 1000000 times that we have about
that that shows you all of them. But,
you know, here's just one. Andrea Lynn sharing
and you've probably saw this already. It's Elon
Musk. He's the one behind he's narrating in
the microphone going, and here's our robots walking
out our Tesla robots. And, you know, you
already know that. It's not new, but it's
it's interesting how that's a concerning thing when
it's anybody but Elon.
But that's where this goes. He he's he's
he's even had conversations in the last couple
of months talking about humanoid robots and, you
know, yes, that just means looking like a
human, but maybe more.
DARPA,
again, let's not forget, as DARPA seems to
be Elon's
handler. I mean, I'm kind of joking when
I say that because I think it's bigger
than that, but DARPA being a clear extension
of these programs.
The quiet transition from DARPA's x AI, their
explainable AI program that ended supposedly in 2021,
and Elon's lowercase xi program which started in
just 2022 in the beginning.
It's the same thing, guys. It's just they
they stopped the their program and Elon picks
it up for the public face. It is
the same artificial intelligence program created by DARPA
that is using you to train it, which
is going to be used for all the
things we're discussing, and it is immersed with
Israeli intelligence and the I mean, everything we've
talked about.
So remember that.
AI powered decisions for everything.
Isn't that the concerning thing we were all
worried about before? Yes. Yes. But Elon's doing
it, so it's okay. Well, DARPA issues an
RFP for biohybrid robotics.
January 6, 2025.
It says, according to a notice posted by
sam.gov,
far Friday, DARPA, DSO, is planning an to
award an advanced research concepts or ARC opportunity
to support the hybridizing
biology
and robotics through integration
for deployable systems or hybrids.
You love their acronyms.
Biohybrid
robots composed of biological and synthetic elements.
You remember who else was talking about that?
What's the first industrial revolution
will lead to is a fusion
of our physical,
our digital,
and our biological
identities.
It's the difference of this forced to,
It gets it. You get it. It goes
on from there. That it's just wild to
me. Right? Now so the I'm not you
can't say that this because DARPA is doing
it is Elon's agenda. That's fair. But I
think it's quite clear how we see this
pipeline work.
Either way, again, my point is not about
Elon or Trump or I mean, that's an
extension of the point, but it's about the
government. And they're just extensions of the government.
So it's not one or the other. It's
your government. And this is part of your
government. DARPA is doing this. So it's a
matter of time until Elon, as an extension
of the government, continues to roll out this
agenda. It seems very clear to me. And
if you can't recognize that that is literally
Klaus Schwab, who probably I mean, at this
point, it might even
be the case that they rolled him out
with his Bond villain accent just to get
you to go wild, crazy, no, bad guy,
so that you accept the Elon one.
That's how they work.
Now, I'm gonna go show you I'm gonna
get into Derek's recent article, and then we're
gonna get into the meat of today which
is ultimately the Israel conversation and the overlapping
part with
the I mean, it's all really globalism.
But the genocide aspect of it and the
US government aspect of it, which is kind
of overlapped. But this is what he just
ruled came out with on November 30th. Meet
the spyware companies preparing to unleash their tech
during Trump's second administration.
So this
was about a lot of different stuff, the
NSO Group, Paragon Solutions, and different Israeli spyware
firms.
The main one of the main points is
that you may not know excuse me, hiccups.
Excuse me. You may not know this,
but almost 50% of the market in the
world is Israeli spyware.
And that's not like some you know, that
that means
immersive
secret
stuff that you don't know was on your
computer. So this isn't like something you market
and sell. Like, this is stuff that peep
like, intelligence operations use. And this 50% of
the market in the world are about it's
like 40 something percent.
So other than that, though, it's simply showing
you that this is the this is the
immersive problem that you can prove that Israeli
intelligence is an extension through all of these
different start ups they have. They've openly praised
this. And so now that we can see
that Trump's administration is packed to the hill
with Zionists, it's important to recognize that this
is an extension. It's spreading out. It's going
wild. We've talked about all the different start
ups, the different aspects of in like, as
as Whitney,
I have that
clip. I'm gonna see if I can just
grab real quick. As pointed out more than
once, and we've had interviews about this as
well. The important reality
that Israel
is infiltrating this country in a 1,000 different
ways, whether politically, whether it's APAC, whether it
is start ups, but also the concern of
what they ultimately have the ability to control.
And Whitney's made this point before about, like,
nuclear re reactors,
electronic electric grids.
A whole bunch of different concerning aspects that
both people just don't wanna talk about. I'll
just grab that real quick since we bring
it up.
We're not gonna get into this too much,
but
let's see.
There we go. Alright. So since we're talking
about it,
the point is to recognize how easy it
would be
with the kind of influence they have to
carry out some kind of a false flag
or psychological operation or create chaos for the
interest of what they wanna achieve. Right?
Worth considering at the very least.
Hope founded the So an Israeli intelligence
guy forms this company and says we're gonna
take care of American hospitals,
dams,
water infrastructure. Dams come later, but it was
First Health Infrastructure,
and they partnered with CISA that's supposed to
protect critical structure including election infrastructure, but also
things like water systems, the power grid, all
sorts of things like that as well as
hospitals. And
beyond that, it's not just hospitals anymore. As
you mentioned, it's expanded to dams, it's expanded
to water systems, and also nuclear reactors in
the United States. So you have a foreign
intelligence founded
nonprofit
being offered
access to all of these critical systems in
the United States. How is this being allowed?
I mean, we know the deep connections between
Israel and the United States. So this is
this goes deeper than that.
You know, it's always so frustrating. It's like
this is Whitney and I have been talking
about this, and she's been talking about it
longer than anything, but, you know,
a long time. We had conversations about this
in 2019,
2021, 20 over and over. You know? And
it's just that's what's always frustrating, isn't it?
And it's not like we have a small
platform or she has a small platform. Like,
it's funny that these it takes the certain
characters
to just point to something, for it to
get you know, it's that doesn't have to
mean it's dishonest. And doesn't mean it's bad
that people are looking at it, but it's
worth pointing out how interesting that is. Like,
Candace Owens and US is Liberty. I just
don't think that was a great interview. But
it's strange, isn't it? How all of a
sudden and, I mean, there's been people I
argue who have large platforms, it like, borderline
similar that had these conversations, and it doesn't
go anywhere. Like, these are there's a reason
that we're seeing that. But keeping that in
mind.
So all of this is point
beginning you the overlap is clear, and Trump's
administration seems to be leaning in as aggressively.
So Derek followed up on this around the
s NSO Group. And by the way, Whitney's
written about the front limit hangout, a lot
about NSO Group in particular. This is from
today. Israeli spyware firm NSO Group found libel
oh, it's yesterday, excuse me, for hacks of
WhatsApp users.
So it says in late December of of
the northern district of California ruled against Israeli
spyware firm NSO Group, finding the controversial firm
liable for hacking and to breach a contract.
And and the NSO Group used their malicious
spyware known as PEGASUS, which you should be
familiar with, we've talked about it a lot
in the past, to infiltrate and monitor devices
and extract information
using what are known as zero click exploits
or a zero click hack.
This means that a user does not even
need to click a link or download a
program
for a hacker to access their device.
That's the kind of level we're talking about.
Instead, they exploit the the Pegasus exploits existing
software like WhatsApp servers. So they find a
way to infiltrate those apps, and then you
don't even need to click anything.
They can just literally infiltrate your phone.
And this has been proven for a long
time.
Now think about the see, actually, that's important
to highlight right now, and it's just so
unnerving, especially for somebody like me or somebody
in this field that highlights these kind of
things.
That we already know that Israel
has the ability to infiltrate
technology
in light of the pager attack in Lebanon.
As they now even reported even further,
it it's been it was 10 years. Now
they could be exaggerating.
They the first report was 5 years. Either
way, years. They let these things circulate in
Lebanon. Children more the I think it was
something like 80% of the people hurt were
civilians.
But who cares? Because they praise it as
a great innovation,
otherwise known
as deliberate or rather just explicit terrorism. And
that that meant every definition of terrorism, which
just shows you that the west, the government,
the media, they support terrorism, period. They just
call it something else.
The reality being, though, the infiltration of tech
in the United States in light of what
we just saw there, and it is rampant.
So as we can see, now that we
know they have this and they've already been
caught doing it, they're even being sued and
ruled in favor of the suit that they
literally could have stuff implanted. Now, I realize
we're not talking about whether
there's 2 things to look at. Whether there's
something it actually physically put in the phone
which is different, but also the ability to
actually I mean, even like a power surge
in some of these things could cause some
something to happen. But either way, the point
is about spying on top of all of
it. Right? I just wanna make the extreme
point of what we just saw and what
they're willing to do. And who cares about
civilian harm? Clearly, they don't care about civilian
harm.
But it says the
Epic,
one of the group that investigated this, has
also submitted a Freedom of Information Act request
to the FBI,
seeking information about its connections to the NSO
Group because they work with these entities,
and its use of PEGAS' spyware.
The organization, of course, has yet to hear
back from America's largest law enforcement agency because
they'll probably never respond to that. Despite the
court ruling and the attempt at sanctioning NSO
Group, it's unlikely to deter the firm from
continuing its Sarepta's practices.
Now why would that pass how how could
that possibly be? Right?
It says as a November court filing made
clear,
even after NSO Group was sued by Meta,
Facebook,
the parent company of WhatsApp,
in a different suit,
they just continued practicing spying on Americans
and users.
What no. The only you you might going,
well, how is that possible? Why where's the
enforcement arm? What could possibly be stopping
the US enforcement arm from doing something about
that? Gee, I don't know. Maybe because the
FBI and our government and everybody's immersed and
overlapped with this very thing, maybe that's because
they've been compromised. Maybe because of this, they
have blackmail on them. Maybe they're part of
the agenda. The point is it's crazy to
see how these things just keep going.
And it says, the evidence, quote, the evidence
unveiled
shows exactly how the NSO's operations violated US
law and launched their cyberattacks against journalists,
human rights activists, and civil society. That's according
to WhatsApp themselves.
Now it goes on to say the NSO
Group first came to prominence in 2020 when
more than 50,000
phone numbers belonging to individuals identified as, quote,
people of interest
by nations using PEGASIS
were leaked to Amnesty International
and Forbidden Stories.
The data was then distributed to 17 media
outlets under the name, the Pegasus Project. That's
where this got most of the attention, including
The Guardian,
Lamont, Lamonte, Washington Post, Frontline, The Wire, Prusco.
It's,
process how do you say that? Is that
process? Prosesco?
Not familiar. But, anyway, the reporting revealed that
NSO Group developed and supplied
their Pegasus spyware to international governments which in
turn use the tool to target government's officials,
journalists, activists, academics, and embassy workers. So when
you see some of these massive events,
the murder of Khashoggi, for example, the assassination
of Soleimani, you can wonder how much they
were involved or, really, I think you need
to recognize how obvious it is.
Now it says the report from Washington Post
showed that Pegasus was used to target the
wife of journalist Jamal Khashoggi months before he
was murdered.
Pegasus leadership has denied their spyware was used
in the murder. Of course.
Just like they deny everything they're doing right
now in Palestine. Now it says in 2022,
it was reported that the FBI had purchased
a license to use Pegasus.
FBI director Christopher Wray, of course, claimed it
was only for research and development, of course.
Quote, he says, to be able to figure
out how bad guys could use it, for
example. That's literally what he said.
Until they got got caught using it.
That's how dumb this is. That's how stupid
this always is.
We are doing it because we're the good
guy. And then they literally use it to
spy on people. I mean, it's just it's
that's my point about everything else earlier. The
the evidence can be to the to
as much as you would need for anything.
And they just
go, wrong. You're a liar.
Racist.
And move forward.
Because the enforcement arm doesn't care. And that's
the that's the tipping point of history. Right?
They must have known that from a long
time back. Like, why we can't see anybody,
whether we're judges or even the government aspects
or police. It seems that by and large,
these people team tend to look the other
way. Maybe that's why the Israeli IDF trains
our police forces in many cases. Maybe that's
why on and on and on. Either way,
it's infuriating
that we can see such a vivid example
where they keep doing that or we won't
take your information around this because privacy. And
then they get caught selling it to companies.
They go, oops. We made a mistake. Over
and over and over and over.
It says, however,
internal FBI documents and court records obtained by
The New York Times showed that FBI officials
attempted to use Pegasus in 2020 and 2021
in their own investigations.
Oops. After The Times reported on these and
I've realized what that means is that gave
Israel intelligence
access
to the FBI. Now wonder how that what
else that might have accomplished.
Maybe that's behind a lot of these agendas
we're talking about. But either way, the point
is the same. They know about this and
seem to not care, or maybe they got
compromised. Now they can't do anything about it.
After The Times reported on the secret purchase
and attempted use of Pegasus, the FBI conducted
an internal investigation to uncover who used the
tools only to find out that the FBI
itself
contracted with the vendor, Riva Networks.
And now what happened?
Nothing.
Now it says in September 24th, the US
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ICE, signed a $2,000,000
1 year contract with another controversial Israeli spyware
vendor, Paragon Solutions.
The contract involved Paragon's
US subsidiary
based in Chantilly, Virginia,
and ICE's Homeland Security Investigations division 3.
So, gee, now that ICE is all gung
ho and already starting to roll out operations
and they're using Israeli spyware, what do you
think that's gonna do when they start using
all of this to scan biometrics and to
get digital information and to I mean, what
do you it's this okay. Same point before.
Even if you agree with everything they're putting
forward around this, you have to still see
how the I mean, the best agendas in
history are usually using something true or accurate
or genuine to piggyback on because then it's
easier to accept
or harder to see.
He says by October 31st, more than 30
civil society and digital rights organizations and spyware
experts signed a letter which calls on the
Department of Homeland Security to release details about
that $2,000,000
contract with Paragon.
In 2021,
Forbes first reported on the existence of Paragon
and noted that many of Paragon's employees, their
LinkedIn profiles, just like I was just showing
you with a different or I think that
was actually the same company. But any of
these companies you look at, it's the same.
You know what they found?
Rampant connections to Israeli intelligence.
Both current
and former, which in quotes is usual
aspects. But it says Paragon's cofounder,
director, and chief shareholder
were was a for were former commanders of
Israeli elite unit, unit 882100,
as usual. Paragon's CEO, Eden Nurik, and CTO,
also former members of Israeli intelligence.
It's almost like any of these spyware companies
are almost always run by all intelligence agencies,
almost like it's an extension of Israeli intelligence.
Funny how that looks.
But it says former Israeli prime minister, Yev
Barak, is also listed as a cofounding director
and investor. Barak is known for his connections
to Israeli firms, Toca and Carbine 9 one
one, both of which we've discussed. Toca specifically,
actually, I was just talking about this recently.
See if it pops up. It's a article,
yeah, that Whitney wrote recently.
Meet Toca, the most dangerous Israeli spyware firm
you've never heard of.
All these are immersed and overlapped with all
the stuff that's going on.
And Carbine, from the article, which I'll include
as well, the prince and the spy that
Whitney wrote for TLav,
and I think it was
May of 2023,
outlines exactly what we were just talking about.
And if I can pluck it out real
quick,
the point is that they say
openly
that what they're doing is essentially in the
interest
of Israeli intelligence.
Think it was right here.
Maybe I'll be able to pluck it out.
Yeah. Right here.
It's saying that the same article also contains
the stunning revelation that many Israeli companies including
Black Cube, remember the one that was used
by Weinstein to go after
that way, that was yeah. It was Black
Cube. Right? To go after the the women
that were accusing him of rape, which were
correct. And he used
Israeli spies to go after them and and
harass them, which is typical.
They have been they have been founded as
literally fronts for intelligence operations 2,012. They're openly
praising and saying that. It's not new and
it's something you have to understand.
So why is it not concerning to America
First people that this is what's going on?
Now it finishes with what it says with
less than 3 weeks until Donald Trump's return
to the White House, the American public ought
to continue watching the spyware industry and the
growing number of contracts between these surveillance firms
and the US government under the guise of
immigration, under the guise of the border, under
the guise of whatever else, even if something
you care about.
It's like the Sabacc point. Right? You can
argue that it's obviously important to make sure
that the the law is upheld or that
people who have citizenship are voting,
that shouldn't be denied. But they're using that
important conversation to piggyback digital IDs. It's the
same point, guys.
And since I mentioned it, I'll include that
too.
Oh, that's this. Okay. And I also include
a couple of other articles on that topic.
Let's grab this Save Act article for you
in case you wanna watch that to understand
what's going on with digital ID.
But the point is going back in further,
this is 2018, Whitney Webb, Snowden. Israeli spyware
used by governments to pursue journalists targeted for
assassination. This is this is Israel. This goes
back a long time. It wasn't some all
of a sudden, October 7th reaction. They love
to make it sound like that.
December 5,
2017, meet the Israeli cyber weapons dealer paid
1,000,000 by governments to hack our phones,
and we're just letting them right in the
front door.
Now
the overlap here as we get into this
interesting conversation,
the partisan
misrepresentation,
the Israeli or just foreign entity,
the the foreign elements and their infiltration of
our government,
whatever foreign element that is. Like, it's interesting
to me right now that people, you know,
you get this pushback, which by the way,
it's interesting that we'll talk about Israel. People
say,
why are you only talking about that? What
about America? And then Elon spends a week
talking about the UK and, you know, but
there were a lot of people,
conservatives that were going, like, why are you
talking about this? Like, why aren't you focusing
on us? Which is good to see. But
what's interesting though is that clearly,
like, what we're highlighting here is not some
side point.
Like, the the unnerving reality, whether Israel, China,
or any other foreign element, to highlight what
we're showing you, to highlight what they're doing
in committing genocide. And then you point at
that and people go, like, oh, you're just
obsessed with Israel. It's like, what? It's it's
like saying China's marching down the streets of
the United States, and they're like, oh, you're
just obsessed with China. Like, well, they're literally
doing it. You can see it. Isn't that
a problem? Now you're obsessed with China. Like,
guys, you have to you have to see
how
sad it is that we know what's going
on, and you get people that just wanna
deflect and go, you're just obsessed with Israel.
No. We're obsessed with murder and people killing
children, you know, matters to us.
But on that note,
Brendan Circus highlights what Trump just recently said,
which is ultimately that Hezbollah
apparently was a January 6th now.
Weird, who benefits by pretending Hezbollah was there?
But guess what? You know why this is
most important to me? That don't forget what
I've been saying about this the entire time.
That ultimately, I I shot him. Yeah. I
grabbed that one.
That January 6th
was a failed false flag.
Right? Or the main one was just a
government operation. But
as I I did this on March 23,
2022. January 6th, the failed false flag meant
to blame blame Russia and you, being conserves
conservatives at the time,
using the CIA grown Aza battalion. Now I
think that agenda blew up in their face,
which as we all saw, the the clumsy,
disjointed shift from they're Nazis, and it's a
bad thing, to suddenly, never mind, they changed
a long time ago and you're all crazy
and racist. Because then suddenly they used them
and wanted to be on their side. But
the point was is you if you watch
and watch the show,
it was being built to blame Russia as
cultivating that. And I think to blame it
on the United States as the overlap. Remember
the rise above movement, Charlottesville march? That was
the Azov movement. It's on the record. That
was their international arm in the United States.
Funny how as many times I can prove
this and talk about it, it doesn't get
any real reach out there. It's important to
think about, though, and realize that that is
the case. And that means they were trying
to connect the dots to back to the
group they were cultivating, and they have for
a long time.
So the point in this case is to
point out that
now they're using it a different way. So
if you understand that Israel was behind this
in a large way, because Israel is funding
the Azov movement.
Just grab all these things in case you
don't know that. Rights groups demand Israel stop
arming neo nazis in Ukraine. This is 2018.
Literally talking about the Azov movement. Their own
people are going, why are you funding Nazis?
Right? If if you're confused by that, you
shouldn't be. That's been going on since the
actual
Nazis. The point is that they're funding these
groups. Right? And the agenda was to get
that to be recognized as the problem, but
use that to blame Russia and conservatives. Now
you suddenly have another element being pointed to
that we're claiming was there on January 6th.
And Hezbollah,
which Israel has an agenda to go after
them and blame Iran for it. Right? Which
is interesting because that's also where a lot
of this leads back to in every agenda.
But either way, recognize where the common denominator
is. Another group lying about what was going
on there to achieve a certain agenda. But
here's what Trump had to say. Because you
realize how dumb this argument is. How basically
I mean, there's little evidence for most of
what they claim. But so you got them
still calling an armed insurrection, but now on
the other side of it, that's how it
works. Trump calling Hezbollah there. People are trying
to act like he misspoke or something. I
think we understand what this really is. Are
you planning to pardon those who were charged
with violent
offenses? Well, we're looking at it, and we
have other people in there. And as you
see First of all, let's recognize how they're
already pretending by that answer that he's gonna
pardon all the January 6ers. Did he really
pretend that's what he just said? Like, think
think about how taking an answer like this,
that's basically not even a non answer, it's
a deviate, it's a sidestep, and pretending he's
gonna pardon them all,
which maybe he will. But I get the
sense that we're that's why they asked that.
What about the violent ones? Whatever you might
think that amounts to. And you know, obviously,
there's a real definition for something that would
be a violent attack, but we know they
misrepresented a lot of it. But listen again,
to me, this is just
you get to believe what you want from
what you think I mean. That's how he
plays this.
Are you planning to pardon those who were
charged with violent
offenses? Well, we're looking at it, and we
have other people in there. And as you
see, I guess, 24 or 28 people came
now from the FBI
that came out very
Just I mean, really Why do I need
to pardon those with violent offenses? Well, we're
looking at it, and we have other people
in there.
Well, we're looking at it, and we have
other people in there. That's the answer.
And as you see And as you see,
there was FBI there. And then just goes
into the conversation.
Great answer.
Funny how you could make that into he's
pardoning everybody.
I guess 24 or 28 people came now
from the FBI.
Which is true. Right? And we've known that
since the very beginning of this. That wasn't
some new bombshell.
Openly in congress and plenty of other examples,
they've already been at this. Remember, we talked
about this from the very beginning. There was
a psychological psychological
operations element there from the navy, I think,
was if I remember correctly. There was FBI
agents. There was all sorts of examples
way early in this conversation.
That came out very quietly. Nobody reported it,
but they had Yeah. A lot of us
did.
People in some form related to the FBI.
They had 4 or 5 people that were
strongly related to the FBI. We have to
find out about that.
We have to find out about his No
answer apparently on whether you're gonna pardon violent
January 6ers. Right? Hezbollah. We have to find
out about Okay. Sorry. Yeah. That was the
part right there. Only related to the FBI.
We have to find out about that.
We have to find out about Hezbollah.
We have to find out about who exactly
was in that whole thing because Come on.
There's no way I mean, it is possible.
But if you're gonna try to pretend that
was not very clearly stated, not some accident,
and find out who was really there, he's
trying to insinuate just like Israel's been doing
since January or October 7th that there was
Hamas
present, or they're coming to the border and
that's what they're you know, that's what they're
trying to do.
It's lazy. There's not there's nothing that indicates
that whatsoever, but they just wanna lay that
table so they can keep I mean, it's
this is psychological operation stuff, guys. This is
4th, 5th generation warfare. People that did some
bad things were not prosecuted. You know, I
see it all the time, and you see
it too. People that were doing some bad
things weren't prosecuted,
and people that didn't even walk into the
building are in jail right now. So we'll
be looking at the whole thing, but I'll
be, making major pardons. Yes.
Right. So, see, we all know pardons are
happening. He's already said that. So he just
basically ends with yes, pardons, and they then
just dis they just make that into he's
pardoning all the well, I I hope so
because I think almost everyone there deserves that
because it was a massive operation.
But regardless of what you think about it,
it's important to recognize that this is about
planting the Hezbollah seed and the idea that
they were somehow present on January 6th. No.
Maybe it ends up going nowhere. They see
Whitney says, what the f is this? It's
stupid.
But so the point being, remember, this I
just think is an extension of this manipulation
of what January 6th ultimately was.
I'll include these for you. And this is
the second one. January 6th was always a
very clear government operation.
Right? We go over the elements that were
there from the the left of the conversation,
and we're on video going, we tricked him.
We did it. We got it's very lazy.
You've got Sergei Benignon,
Benignon. I think it was correct. He's from
the Ozark movement. It's all in this it's
all in the show. Right? He's literally they
are screaming, let's go in Russian. It was
about trying to make it look like it
was a Russian element, guys. And, of course,
this is where the clumsy Laura Loomer swings
in and tries to pretend like she broke
this whole story and leaves out can you
guess which part? Can you guess?
Anything that has to do with Israel and
how they literally immersed this entire thing. Shocker.
Guys, and don't forget, that was right before
a lot of this conversation.
You think that's not obviously for a reason?
Because after this all spun out, it was
important to make sure you did not see
what they were doing in this larger agenda.
I think mostly because of how Republicans
were they cared about Ukraine.
Either way you look at it, guys, it's
very important to see how these controlled elements
are acting.
Now you've one of these clips I'll play
next is you've already seen. But I'm gonna
start with this one from Philip Giraldi, another
former CIA agent speaking up about what they
know about Israel. Now as always,
whether it's a c former CIA or CIA
agent or whatever else, take it. Show discernment.
Consider if they may be mis deceiving you
for some reason or if they have an
agenda. But also consider it in line with
all the rest of the evidence. In my
opinion, this is exactly what's actually happening. A
former CIA agent stated that a foreign country
has effectively taken control of the United States.
Can you guess which one?
Israel interferes in American elections. It has corrupted
our congress.
Its head of government publicly rebukes our own
head of state. One other good very good
reason why Israel should not receive 1,000,000,000 of
dollars in military assistance annually is its persistent
espionage against the United States. Grant Smith has
described how Friends of Israel sold enriched uranium
from a Pennsylvania refinery to create a nuclear
arsenal.
Israel, where government and business work hand in
hand, has obtained significant advantage
by systematically stealing American technology
with both military and civilian applications.
The US developed technology is then reversed engineered
and used by the Israelis to support their
own exports.
In 1996,
defense investigative service report noted that Israel has
great success
sealing technology
by exploiting the numerous co production projects that
it has with the Pentagon.
It says, placing Israeli nationals in key industries
is a technique utilized with great success.
You really think the US government doesn't know
that by now?
This this is increasing infiltration and compromise. There
is compromise, guys. That's what we're talking about.
You're finding people finding the courage to call
this out everywhere.
And yet somehow, the inner circle republican team
sports partisans
who who were kind of pointing at this
20 years ago, 10 years ago, are suddenly
completely on another
path. You gotta be able to see what
that shows you. It was about trying to,
I think, muddy that conversation when it mattered
and now when it's coming full circle and
it's very transparent, weird how they don't seem
to wanna call it out.
Here's the one I just played from the
other day. And this is important because what
he's telling you is they're not just
controlling this country, but they have inflexeceded
their agents all across this con no. I
mean, combine all what we're talking about. Whether
he's talking about the control of the country,
we're talking about the, you know, the APAC
political influence, we're talking about, as we play
next, literally having undocumented agents that are even
kind of on the record with our government
seated across the country, having start ups that
are working for Israeli intelligence,
controlling all the stuff Whitney was talking about,
how do we not act I mean, this
is, I mean, truly terrifying. When you look
at what that picture shows you and then
recognize that your government seems to be ignoring
the fact that we all see what's happening,
that we're calling for their arrest in some
cases, and they just keep going.
This is why. Threaly embassy was unusual.
My very first day at the CIA, we
had a senior FBI agent come to talk
to the new higher class.
And one of the things that he said
has stuck in my mind
all of these 32 plus years.
We were talking about trying to spot spies
who were spying on us. Most embassies here
in Washington have what are called declared officers.
Those are foreign intelligence officers who are here,
formally known to the FBI and the CIA
as intelligence officers.
This FBI agent told us at the time
that the Israeli embassy was unusual. The Israeli
embassy had 2 declared officers, 1 from Shin
Bet and 1 from Mossad.
And it had
187
undeclared officers
that the FBI had been able to identify
spread out all across America,
in academia,
in the defense contracting industry.
Now realize he's not like the don't be
confused by the he's talking about formally. Like,
these are people that are in that are
agents, not like they're used to be. He's
talking about the 2 they've acknowledged
and over a 100 of ones that they
know
but are technically unacknowledged,
which I don't even know how you make
sense of that if they know about them.
Right? That's a that's an agreement.
Yet another example of this stuff being called
out.
Now just to remind you, because this is
what we're kind the real high being highlighted
here is we're not talking about some kind
of Jewish infiltration.
Yes. There's an overlap
of Zionism and Jewish and the Jewish religion
just like there's an overlap of Zionism and
the Christian religion.
Zionism is the problem. Zionism is the infiltration.
So you can prove this because here we
can show in many I mean, in hundreds
of examples or of Jewish people speaking up
and standing in protest with the Palestinians
this entire time or that we have groups
that are being called anti Semitic leading these
protests at Columbia University that are literally
Jewish Voices for Peace, an entire Jewish organization.
But, see, it gets misrepresented by the media.
But here we have orthodox Jews
all across the world in this place in
this case, in New York,
during an anti Zionist protest in in New
York, pros Israeli Zionists attack
anti Zionist rabbis. Orthodox Jewish rabbis getting beat
up by Zionists. It doesn't get much more
clear than that. It says as they're writing,
Zionism,
the real enemy of the Jews. The real
enemy of the Jews and Judaism is Zionism.
The perverse nonreligious ideology called Zionism is was
invented to destroy Judaism.
Now you can agree or disagree. That's what
the Torah Judaism orthodox Jewish community is saying.
And what you can see is this
And it it happens constantly, guys.
I have videos of IDF beating these people
up, Jewish
orthodox Jewish rabbis in the street because they're
protesting the IDF or Israel.
It just get it can't be the bottom
line, Zionism is not Judaism. Right? To make
it about one thing as opposed to the
overlapping problem is a choice.
Zionism is the real issue here, and that
doesn't mean that there's not Jewish people or
people that are of the Jewish faith that
absolutely believe that that's the same thing. That
exists.
But there's also a whole faction of Jewish
organizations and Jewish people and just average that
call this out.
It's as simple as that. So you just
can't make it a broad stroke thing. In
reality, let's not forget, broad stroking is almost
always a stupid thing. Right? It is it
is it is, in some in some cases,
wrapping in people to a conversation that does
not apply because it's broad stroking.
That we used to always acknowledge that as
ignorance.
So let's go over what Israel is doing
in regard to the genocide, that it's important
not to miss because it has not even
remotely slowed down. So if you haven't caught
up on some of these things because of
I mean, you'd be forgiven for missing just
a thousand other wild psychological operations playing out
in front of you right now. From the
fog to the drones to the Greenland, I
mean, it's just nonsense. It's just constant, constant,
constant. That's why.
Now Ryan Grim points out, if you didn't
see this on January 5th from drop site
news,
no rape allegations filed in October 7th attacks.
According to the Israeli prosecutor,
according to Israeli Ynet News, Ynet is the
platform.
Ynet spoke to Moran Gaz who, until recently,
led the security cases division at the southern
district prosecutor's office in Israel and was a
member of team 710 responsible for cases involving
captured Palestinians in connection with October 7th attacks.
Their investigation related to sexual violence, she says,
in the end,
we don't have any complaints.
What was presented in the media compared to
what we eventually can't come together will be
entirely different.
I mean, it's just ridiculous, but you all
know this already. Anybody with a mark of
honesty has already become clear or already become
aware of this because of evidence that's come
through the Israeli media,
from Israeli whistleblowers, from I mean, it's from
IDF members.
The evidence is overwhelming. Ryan Grim says, remember
how Israel posted multiple videos of brutalized Palestinian
detainees,
quote, confessing to rape on 10/7? How many
times we told you that?
When the guys that were shaking in those
little white white gowns they give them, and
they're on record going, yes. We did this
to this girl, and we did it. And
then go on to make a bunch of
other claims, like, we beheaded babies. Oh, but
guess what? We know for a fact that
it happened. Right? And I tried to make
that case then, even when the rape discussion
was still up in the air. And I
you know what I said then? I say
it now too. Damn them for making us
have to shout down a conversation that's that
disgusting. Right? Nobody wants to come out and
be like, you're lying about rape. The point
is that they were, they are, and damn
them for making us have to go into
that conversation.
But remember,
they forced them to admit these things. We
now know for a fact that didn't happen.
That can't be forgotten.
But people are it's just it's there's a
1,000 of those points just from since October
7th. There's also a 1000000 more of them
that go back before that.
But it goes on to say, and Sheryl
Sandberg included these quote confessions in her documentary,
which is just riddled with absolute atrocity propaganda
that are false, if you don't know what
that means. And the White House screened and
promoted the quote documentary. Well, remember Biden also
came out and said, Ford, have you had
a baby? I saw myself.
Think about how quickly this was proven to
be abs absurdly
dishonest.
Well, it never happened, let alone he didn't
see it himself. So that's Biden, the leader
of the country saying that, at least, abstent
ostensibly the leader of the country,
publicly saying I saw it, but he didn't.
And that didn't derail the whole conversation? How?
He goes on to say, and the New
York Times reported they had found evidence of
the systematic use of sexual violence. Remember all
that?
It was all fabricated.
And the goal was to justify a genocide.
And now that the goal is within reach,
it can be safely discarded. Mission accomplished.
It's just so
sad.
Now Mohammad Shehadeh points out, Israel has yet
again, same conversation, but different point, in front
of the United Nations. So now that they're
going, well, we don't have anything to back
that up.
Israel again blocks a UN investigation
into October 7th rape allegations,
fearing it might expose Israel's own systematic RAS
rape of Palestinians.
Israel has blocked every single UN request to
thoroughly investigate their claims of mass rape.
And here's the actual article, which is right
here. Israel blocks UN probe into Hamas sexual
crimes.
Why would they do that?
It's funny how in other context, the game
is gonna be the UN is Hamas or
whatever. But except when they don't want that
to be the case, they lean into whatever
the UN does. Like, good. Give them that
resolution and good. We did or Elon Levy
going UN. We need this to happen. So
now you're working with Hamas?
It's just my point is this conversation has
become so cartoonishly stupid. Everything about it is
obviously dishonest,
And the adults in the room
keep going.
But he goes, the p s, the UN's
Primila patent report was not an investigation.
She stated this herself. Actually, I think I
have that tweet that'll pop up. And I
am it's exactly the point that we made.
I guess it didn't.
Oh, that's it right there, I think.
Yep. There it is.
This is all the way back from March
March 7th. Representative Pamela Patton, who who prepared
the report on alleged sexual violence on October
7th, admits the report is not an investigation
and that it contains unfounded and outright false
testimonies I just discussed this last night. Link
below.
That's what she says, and it's very clear.
Yet, they came out and were like, she
proved it.
Why? Because they know they're doing they're they
know they're lying. There's no way around it.
Zoe goes on to say, she stated herself
and said Israel is refusing to cooperate with
relevant UN bodies and investigate
investigative mandate. That's the new part.
Next, well, how she had also points out,
Israel has something called what the mosquito protocol,
in which they kidnap Palestinian civilians,
use them as slaves, human shields,
and force them to inspect booby trapped areas
to spare the lives of IDF sniffer dogs.
Sometimes, after the task is done, the IDF
shoots them dead. Now you may be listening
to some podcast. You may be watching this
going, no way. I know that's not true.
It can't be, except that's what Heretz is
reporting. Even though it is one of the
most documented discussions in all of this, people
just wanna pretend it's not true.
This is literally Heretz, like, everything or Times
of Israel, we'll show you next for those
that wanna pretend only Heretz is the liar.
Palestinian and Gaza shot to death by Israeli
commander while assisting
IDF forces. Look at what the subtitle says.
Israeli media reported that that the Palestinian,
who was forced by the IDF to serve
as a human shield
and search buildings in Gaza's con units area
was shot to death by a commander who
didn't know he was authorized to be there.
Oh, so he just shot a random kid
just because he was there? Well, yes. We
already know that, guys. That's been admitted by
all of them.
It's so sick how obviously criminal all of
this is. That's him right there, or at
least one of the images. That's the kind
of thing we're dealing with.
Blindfolded? Why? Isn't he working with you? It's
just it's I the point is as Mohammed
is pointing out, they just killed these people,
guys. This wasn't some accident. My point is
I bet somebody called this out and that's
why I got attention.
Because there's that that that don't forget. There
are people that are even in the IDF
that are continuing coming back and, you know,
I'm not gonna
try to give any kind of, lack of
accountability here. But there are still ones that
come back
and can't deal with it and then whistle
blow. And they're telling you what's going on.
The Haratz has written 7 different articles about,
you know, citing all sorts of IDF members.
A main one that just came out was
before October 7th when they were talking about
how he just walked out and just broke
a little kid's arm because he doesn't like
Palestinians. Guys, this is always what's been going
on.
He says the commander
was shot and killed. The Palestinian was assisting
IDF troops according to the reported published by
the hottest places in hell. According to the
report published in the Hebrew Language Independent Investigative
Journalism website, the Palestinian was forced to serve
as a human shield and searched buildings, and
communists had received the IDF's permission to be
present in the building. When the commander arrived,
he identified the man as Palestinian, took out
his rifle, and shot him to death.
Simple as that.
Sure sounds like a mistake, doesn't it?
In case you forgot,
this is not even remotely
a small,
unique
this is a constant reality for Israeli IDF.
2013,
Palestinian children tortured,
used as shields by Israel, per the United
Nations.
Reuters.
Israeli soldiers who use Palestinian boy, a 9
year old as human shield
avoid jail.
Defense for Children International, an international human rights
group. Israel forces use 5 Palestinian children as
human shields. That's 2023.
This is from 2017. Generally, human shields. Since
the beginning of the occupation in 1967,
Israeli security forces have repeatedly
used Palestinians in the West Bank and the
Gaza Strip as human shields. Israeli soldiers routinely
used Palestinian civilians as human shields by forcing
them to carry out life threatening tasks. It
was also following a high court petition
against this practice,
which was filed by human rights organizations
around the world in May 2002
that the IDF issued a general order
prohibiting the use of Palestinians as a means
of human shield against gunfire or attacks by
the Palestinian side. But then it goes on
to say, following the order, the use of
human shields dropped sharply.
However, the arms of the army did not
construe as a human shield the use of
Palestinians,
provided they consented.
The army continued the widespread use of this
practice, which they referred to as the neighbor
procedure. Following another petition filed by human rights
organizations, the High Court of Justice ruled that
this practice too violated international humanitarian law, and
that this thus was illegal. And guess what
they've never stopped doing? Here is the Institute
For Middle East Understanding, the neighbor procedure, Israel's
use of Palestinian human shields from 2012.
Human Rights Watch. During military operations, Israeli soldiers
routinely coerced Palestinian civilians, including children, to perform
life endangering acts that assisted military operations, the
practice known as the NAMER procedure. Now see
And this goes back a long way, well
before October 7th. And don't forget, just since
October 7th, there's been at least 4 major
there's been more than that, but major way
cases that have been highlighted even by Israeli
media, even in some cases by mainstream western
media,
openly showing them with a guy tied to
their sheath the hood of their car. Turns
out they melted the guy's skin off because
it was a hot summer day.
But that's just normal stuff for the Israeli
occupation, guys. Here's the article I've included that
I cut I did this on November 9th,
2023,
the open secret of Israel's use of human
shields with a kid literally belted and tied
to the front of their car. That's just
how grotesquely obvious all of this is.
And as Assal Rad points out, even times
of Israel,
Palestinian,
quote, human shield in Gaza for IDF troops
shot dead in error. So the report is
that it was we didn't do it on
purpose. You're you're not you're skipping over the
part that you're using a human shield. Isn't
that your entire narrative about why this is
okay to kill Palestine? I mean,
I don't even need to explain anymore.
If there was any justice in this situation,
this would have ended the 1st month, the
first couple of days. We're well past that.
They're literally showing you we're doing exactly what
we blame them for, but no one's stopping
us. So shut up and go back to
sleep.
It says, Palestinian was serving as a human
shield right in their article.
Practice that has been reportedly commonplace
in the IDF. That literally is what the
article says. They're openly telling you commonplace, and
yet we talk about this here and we're
called racist.
Rabbi Schmuli will call you a anti semite.
It's just ridiculous.
Now realize
this is not a new this is the
reality
for 76 years.
As Bert Tippi is pointing out, harrowing accounts
of Israeli prisons. And, guy, this is so
documented, it makes me sick by human rights
groups, the United Nations.
Some Palestinians have been imprisoned for over 40
years, many of them without any charge.
People arrested when they were 8 years old,
10 years old, 12 years old, they get
released 20 years later.
You get beaten all the time when you're
there. Everything is permitted. Your blood is allowed
to be spilled. We know rape is part
of this that's been publicly discussed.
Food is just enough to keep you alive,
not to satisfy your hunger, so you're always
suffering.
You suffer from any from any illness without
treatment,
and we know about the rape.
And he's talking about it. You can watch
it for yourself. Mohammed Chiyada points out according
to Whitehat News, another Israeli platform, Israel confirms
according to themselves, they seem to be just
letting the cat in the bag these days,
that the IDF used an ambulance to smuggle
soldiers into a refugee camp where they then
killed an elderly woman and a young man.
Just masks off, guys.
Are we gonna pretend like that's just somehow
okay because it's being done by Israeli? That
this is terrorism. By the way, this is
what they've always been doing. This is what
has been like, anything you see in the
past, like, we'll play some clips in a
minute. The idea of the,
you know, the vest bombs and all these
things. Guys, this stems from Zionism.
Now the reality is that they are doing
something that is undeniably, unequivocally a terrorist attack.
You are using a protected element
to secretly bring in weapons and p
and a military entity into a refugee camp
and then execute an attack on civilians.
Not a single mainstream media cover this despite
being reported by west by Israeli media.
Cowards.
Now another example,
this is from
and by the way, he's always including his
source material, another Israeli platform.
And it says, the clearest was what he
writes. The clearest Israeli admission, the IDF is
mass murdering civilians then labeling all butchered males,
including kids, as terrorists. This is, like, the
4th time they've admitted this in writing or
publicly that was written in an article. IDF
officer says murdering innocent
unarmed civilians is, quote, important
to keep soldiers in a state of friction,
to create motivation for action.
I'm just speechless.
Do you think
Matt Miller doesn't know about this? You think
Trump and Biden don't know about this? This
is public invasion that is so broadly discussed,
but you but we don't
right? It just makes me sad.
It says, we often call people terrorists not
because we saw them with weapons. These are
not seen with weapons, but because they were
in a place that from our point of
view is threatening.
They are of the right age, and they're
not supposed to be there, so we kill
them. They're literally admitting to an egregious war
crime. But they I don't even think they
know that or at least they don't think
they're ever gonna be held accountable.
Tiberius pointing out the same point, shows you
that at the Nuremberg trials, the Nazis said
the same thing about Jewish children that they
killed, which was
well, he's a 6 year old, but he'll
grow up to be a terrorist.
Right. That's exactly what they're doing here. Which
by the way, in other cases, this is
being,
blocked by Twitter.
So you can't see it, which I think
is important because they don't block Amber. They
block they allow much more graphic and disgusting
things. I don't think they want you to
see this conversation coming from an Israeli entity
saying,
by the time and so the point is
this. You've seen this image
before October 7th.
Some what? It's like a 4 year old
with an IDF member aiming his gun right
at the child.
This guy says, by the time they are
6, they are already radicalized.
They are the terrorists of the future. That's
what he says.
That's that's this is the reality of what
people think. And he says, not everybody, but
in the context of what we're highlighting here.
And he goes, this is what they did
at the Nazis. Same thing.
That children would grow up to be a
danger. He says, congratulations. You are the modern
equivalent to a Nazi commander. And he highlights
directly from the tribunal.
Here is, was Greg, and I forget his
name all of a sudden. Give me the
chat his last name. Former special forces speak
he's turned into a anti war activist. He's
been calling this out. It says that Rabeer
writes, the Zionists are replenishing their PR budget
with a 150,000,000
to convince you
that 5 year old's children
are Hamas affiliates.
Objectively are targeting civilians
intentionally. Was there a point where you were
in the field or doing this stuff where
you just kinda had this moment? It it
came on my last deployment where I was
pretty much just in a strictly intelligence role
where I was plugged into the targeting
cycle for kinetic strikes. Mhmm. So, drone strikes
mostly.
Yeah. There just really wasn't any standard proof
for who, was being hit and why they
were being hit if you
ended up on the wrong contact list because
you were some affiliate's baker, and that's the
word that they used, affiliate. How do you
define affiliate? You know, Israel does the same
thing it got. They're just Instagram. Yeah. They're
Hamas affiliate.
It's a it's a 14 year old Hamas
affiliate whose cousin
may be in the civilian sector
of Hamas. Yeah. And so Affiliate. So, like,
they objectively are targeting civilians intentionally.
Even though I'm disgusted by the global war
on terror and I'm now
an anti war activist,
I cannot think of a single instance where,
you know, people are like, oh, we're gonna
do a punitive strike, kill a bunch of
civilians, and that will teach them. It was
more like they just didn't care. Mhmm. Because
there was, certain metrics of collateral damage where,
you know, lawyers would sign off on them.
So that gave people some shield psychologically from
thinking, like, oh, we're actually the bad guys
because, you know, it's it's legal. Israel doesn't
even do that. They have rogue targeting cells
just doing whatever the fuck they want. So
Alright. Firsthand experience.
Now this is wild to me. Like, this
at one point in time was a massive
worldwide
story.
Today, because it becomes so commonplace,
not even I haven't seen a single media
platform in the mainstream cover this.
This is the World Food Program from the
United Nations reporting, and on the 6th January,
the World Food Programme strongly condemns the horrifying
incident on January 5th
that you probably didn't even hear about when
a clearly marked World Food Programme convoy was
shot at by Israeli forces. Yet again,
over and over, this happens because they're trying
to give them the impression that you can't
help these people because we'll potentially kill you.
And then they report that. Their the group
says, well, there's too much risk. We can't
let them go in. And that allows them
to starve, so they get what they want.
This is probably the I mean, what? Honestly
thinking
maybe the 8th time I've seen this kind
of thing, but from the World Food Program
in particular or rather specifically UN elements being
and not not UNRA, understand, but other UN
elements coming from outside Gaza being openly fired
on. Or the UN elements in in Lebanon
that just become bad guy because they're the
problem all of a sudden because Israel doesn't
wanna be there, and not even the UN
stood up. Not not really.
It's outrageous, as all. Asalrad says, apparently, Israel
shooting at UN aid workers is so normalized
that the media doesn't even bother to cover
it.
Here's Israel's own account on Twitter. So any
so anybody that wants to try to help
Palestinians, even in in in any way whatsoever,
will be called a terrorist by Israel.
Let alone the ones that actually apparently, the
only government in the world that seems to
take actual military action in support of Palestine,
which is the Yemeni government.
Or, specifically, the Houthis, which are is the
Yemeni government.
Ultimately, they're trying to make it out to
be a terrorist group. It is the actual
organic control structure that is running Yemen, not
the Saudi element, not the Israeli element, or
the US control structure, the UAE. All these
elements trying to take what they want from
the most impoverished country in the world. No.
Actual, you Yemenis that are standing up for
what they believe in.
They say Israel wants you to believe the
Houthis should be recognized as what they are,
terrorists.
Literally thinking about the is we're talking about
the Israeli government that is, as we're speaking,
gleefully murdering children, starving a few to death,
raping some people in prisons, and they want
you to go, these people standing up for
all those people we're hurting are the terrorists.
It's almost laughable if it wasn't so disgusting.
Because the US as well as other countries,
including UAE, who's also occupying Yemen, Australia and
Canada have already labeled them as such because
they're all cowards and occupied entities by whatever
we're talking about, whether it's the US infiltration
or control over their countries or it's something
else. It's obvious these people are in lockstep
with an agenda, same like with COVID 19.
They don't care about you or your country
or your rights, any of it.
How we can't see that by now, if
you can't, I I just don't understand. It
is right in your face.
Mohammed Shehada points out, Harritts. Israeli media now
confirms what we've been warning about for months.
All this is rapid succession, guys, but realize,
this is all happening in real time.
We're you don't are you seeing any of
this in corporate media? No. You're hearing Israel
fighting for freedom and Syria has revolution, you
know, Syria is now free or whatever nonsense
they're spitting
despite literally being controlled by a terrorist organization.
And people that Trump was once calling out
as Muslim issues are now in leadership positions
in Syria Despite them trying to fact check
that, it's hilarious by the way, if you
didn't see that point about the breaking the
Virgin Mary.
They they try to go fact check, fake
news. But you read the fact check, it
says they're claiming this was a new event
and it's actually old. That's what they pretend
to fact check. No, No. It's from 2017.
That was clearly cited by what you pretend
you're fact checking. The truth is, Trump was
pointing to a guy breaking in a Virgin
Mary and saying, this is the problem with
Islam. Guys, that's the guy who just got
a leader position in Syria. And, yes, that
was a 2017 video. Today is a different
time frame. Great fact check.
The point is they're trying to gaslight the
reality that they're openly supporting what they 30
seconds ago were telling you were the problem.
But if you think that's confusing,
maybe you need to realize that they've been
doing that the entire time, whether Trump or
Biden or Obama or Bush. They're funding the
radical elements they claim they're fighting.
If you can't get past that simple point,
you're gonna be confused about a lot of
this stuff.
But now in Gaza,
Israel's planning to cram Palestinians into northern Gaza,
into flimsy tents in concentration camps run by
the IDF. Weird exactly like we all told
you was gonna happen.
In southern Gaza, Israel put criminal gangs in
charge, people that they support, and force somebody
else into camps. They're they're basically reporting this
publicly through Haraz.
But don't don't expect to hear this from
any corporate outlet. They're gonna call it freedom.
Now here is Israeli media
as they as you will basically I mean,
it's if you'd care to look into this
fear, it'll horrify you. These are the same
outlets that we're cheering on the idea of
raping prisoners because they're sociopaths.
But it says, channel 14 journalist, his name
is Yotem Zamari,
speaking about the Gaza tents that were flooded.
Right here.
And he says, you celebrated October 7th, and
you got a Nakba.
For me, these images are enjoyable. I don't
care about Palestinian suffering.
You won't find them as rarely asking what
drove Palestinians oppressed for 75 years with with
tens of thousands of imprisoned to October 7th.
The point
is you're just so let's just say you
think and even though you're wrong about what
you pretend they were all celebrating, the point
is let's just say you saw them all
doing that. Does that mean every pal the
the Palestinian child that was born yesterday is
now they don't care, guys. You have to
understand that they're broad stroking this. They hate
every Palestinian, even the child that had nothing
to do with any who was born yesterday.
You we have to be able to see
that.
So that means they are openly admitting as
they are in every other aspect to being
willfully
committing murder.
This just doesn't get any more simple than
that, and it's all being broadcast and being
recorded.
Now it's the, it hate
how do you ever say that? Basically, this
account is highlighting
an Israeli report,
this is all happening in real time, that
8 members of the Israeli parliament, foreign defense
committee, from the coalition parties, Lukud, religious Zionism,
and Jewish power, the 3 most extreme elements
of the whole conversation, Zionism extremism,
with defense minister Katz demanding he issues an
order to Israeli forces to 1, destroy all
energy sources, including fuel, solar, generators, power lines,
everything. Destroy all food sources, water, water houses,
water water pumps. Lay siege to remotely kill
everyone,
not flying a white flag of surrender.
So you might think, oh, it's just one
letter. It's one person. It's just their radical
view. No. No. It's happening. And that's exactly
what they all want to happen, and then
now they're reporting that's already happened. 2 days
later,
we have hit all systems
in existence in Gaza, of existence in Gaza.
The water wells, the sewage system, the water
infrastructure. Weird. Sounds just like Syria, doesn't it?
The agricultural fields, the cattle and sheep herds.
You you you get the picture? There's nothing
about this. There's not even a narrative that
would make that legal.
Look at the Philadelphia
corridor. We see what was there before, full
of houses, orchards, and now it's like a
moon's surface, craters instead of houses.
This is the kind of thing this is
my point. I always feel like I have
to
this is why you want somebody like a
Matt Miller or anybody else pretending like they
don't see this even though you know they
do to be held accountable for this. Because
it's this transparent.
You think they don't know that they're over
here? I mean, this is leadership. This is
the director of the GIS Center of the
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
speaking with Wynette,
reporting what they're doing, what the leadership of
the Israeli military is carrying out. And then
he goes on and says, we've raised the
issue. Or little Chubby Patel comes out and
acts like we're all fighting for the same
thing. It's ridiculous.
They know what they're doing, and I hope
they end up in prison.
Sarah Abdallah pointing out as of yesterday.
Israel dropping bombs on tents in Gaza, Khan,
Yunus right now. You know, the same place
they were literally just conducting operations with that
Palestinian human shield they shot. So that means
they were there, present. They know what's going
on. And then they backed away, bombed it
anyway because they want to kill these people.
Burning alive in tents, yet again. No no
coverage.
And by the way, still supposed to be
a safe zone.
18 civilians have been killed so far, including
8 children.
As she says, this is a holocaust.
No question.
Here is another journalist speaking about what they're
what they're seeing. Or excuse me, an unworker
speaking with the channel 4 news about what
they saw.
It's what you're hearing from
everybody
who comes back from Gaza.
I left Gaza just a few few days
weeks ago. The
people were being crushed to death waiting for
food, for flour,
and children have now started freezing to death
because they don't have enough shelter items.
This is the situation with UNRWA on the
ground. This is the situation with the largest
humanitarian
organization doing everything they can with the rest
of the United Nations. Can anyone take over?
No. Right. It's as that. And I can't
imagine if it's this bad now, how awful
will it be in a few weeks or
in a few months if they cease to
operate working with UNRWA?
Is this genocide?
I'm not a legal expert. That's not for
me to to be able to say, but
I can tell you what I see. We
see children being killed every day. We see
people without food. We see people without access
to clean water on a daily basis.
Disease is spreading. We saw polio return. That
was eradicated after 25 years. It's endless. The
horrors are endless. I have to put to
you what the Israelis say to us, which
is that Hamas is using hospitals
as shelter.
Have you seen
or do you have any evidence that that
is the case? Can you even imagine continuing
to make that point even though there's been
zero evidence despite how many destroyed hospitals we've
seen? And even Al Shifa literally being exposed
in real time even by the corporate media?
And now they just keep destroying one after
another and they keep going, what what the
Israelis say?
Yeah. I mean, every doctor comes back to
the same story. And they just and so
you have real firsthand evidence of a doctor
who's got no skin in the game, or
other documentation, or UN human rights group or
UN or human rights groups, or any note,
but they still go, but Israel says.
How do you not see what that shows
you? It is as transparent as it is
ever going to be.
We have heard these accusations continuously throughout the
war that schools and hospitals are being used,
by for military
reasons. We don't have the evidence of this.
We have the accusations.
What we do know and what we are
certain of is that children and families are
sheltering in these facilities. We do know that
patients are going to these hospitals for treatment,
that doctors are being detained, that doctors are
are being killed while they are working, and
that is against international humanitarian law. And Israel
is saying or at least indicating that they
could in some way start shifting aid into
the strip to where it's needed. Does that
sound in any way credible to you?
I mean, just think about how stupid that
is.
Like, you realize how shockingly uninformed these talking
heads are?
They said they could shift in some aid.
What do you think about that? It's like,
are you effing kidding me? Like, we can
prove in real time that they are actively
blocking this according to everybody,
literally everybody, other than them saying they're not
doing it and the US backing them up.
Everybody, guys. The corporate media's been calling that
out. UN's been calling it out. People on
the ground are videotaping it happening.
Doctors are there going, they block it. I
can see it happening. I mean, well, what
do you think about that? It's like, I
just how do you even take these people
seriously?
No. Why? It does not. Does that sound
in any way credible to you? No. Why?
It does not. It's a complete risk to
the population on top of what they're already
facing. It would be unacceptable
for anyone but the humanitarians on the ground.
They're a party of the conflict. We cannot
have a party of the conflict
responsible for the humanitarian response for 2,000,000 people.
You see, that's just a you see, that's
a different way to answer, but a very
logical answer. Because, of course, the idea is,
well, they they're not the bad guy. They
would only wanna help. Right? It doesn't matter
what you pretend they are. They're technically part
of the conflict, so you can't let one
side be able to dictate what the other
side gets. That's crazy because they'll use that
to their benefit. That's what we see in
war.
But the obvious reality is that you can
literally prove that they have been doing everything
they can to starve these people according to
every report, including was the I was it
the IPC? The the the group that is
literally documenting what is and is not genocide.
And somehow, this guy is gonna interview them
about the genocide and he somehow doesn't know
that?
Yeah. You want my genuine opinion? This is
my just opinion. These people get handed a
paper with talking points, and they walk along
it. I don't think these people are educated
even remotely about what they're getting into. Now,
some of them may choose to, but that's
why they call them talking heads.
Women, children, they're dying every day now because
they don't have the simple items that they
need, the medicine, the food, the shelter. This
needs to be run by the United Nations.
This is the responsibility and the mandate of
the international community, and that is what we
need to continue to be allowed to do.
Well, include this this long thread of many,
many, many, many, many different doctors all telling
you the same exact thing. Israel is murdering
children. Israel is starving people. Israel is shooting
doctors. Israel is executing our our our I
mean, everything.
Verbatim.
Here's, Sawney Thong highlighting what John Marsh Meyer,
was it? Marsh Meyer said? He says, quote,
I think once you get outside of the
west, almost everybody thinks the United States and
the Europeans are morally bankrupt. Now I wanna
be clear about this.
I don't know for sure what the impound
the the the average opinion is of other
people in other parts of the world. But
I get the sense that this is about
the governments.
That's what I think. And it's about it
generally does cascade down into just what they
think about most Americans. But I get the
sense that because of, you know, they see
like, this this is we're
just the digital age. People can watch our
content. They see what's going on. I think
they recognize there's a lot of Americans like
myself that are very aware that they're part
of the problem. And that would say the
same thing about their government and vice versa.
And so I get the sense that it's
not just that we are morally bankrupt, but
that the governments of these areas are. But
it does overlap and some maybe just don't
think that or think that it's us in
particular. Either way. But he says once you
get outside the west, then everybody looks back
and sees what we, in many cases, don't
allow ourselves to see or the partisan elements
stop from being really fully seen. He says,
I mean, we are supporting,
and I'm choosing my words carefully here, he
says. We are supporting a genocide in Gaza.
It's a genocide that people see on their
computers and on their TVs on a daily
basis.
So they know exactly what's going on here.
And the hypocrisy is just quite stunning. This
is kind of telling you. This is the
anybody honest knows this. And that's what's so
wild. That's why I wanna talk more with
people like this about, okay, so what do
we do in this circumstance?
I'm glad we can finally get to this
plateau. We see where we are.
They don't care about us. They don't they
are unmoved by evidence. They don't other than
kinetic action, it seems they don't care. But
we know violence is not the answer because
they want that so they can respond. So
what do we do? This I I we
need to have, like, an entire,
like,
conference about this and discuss how we get
past this. That's how I think. Because we
see it. That's important. They really don't want
you to think everybody else sees it. Just
like with COVID 19, they want you to
think you're alone, but you're not.
He says because the west makes a big
deal of the fact that it's morally virtuous,
that they that we are, you know, an
exceptional nation, we stand taller, we see further.
And when you think about the fact that
we're complicit in genocide, they are, the government.
I mean, it looks like hypocrisy in extreme.
It is. He says, so I think outside
the west, people understand full well that we
are morally bankrupt, the governments I'm saying. And
I think we e even inside the west,
he says, there are lots of people who
have just begun to lose hope that we
have our moral gyroscopes in place
when it comes to dealing with Middle East.
So, again, see what he says? We have
he's talking about the governments.
But in a, you know, the general loyal
sense is we as all of us. But
nonetheless, the point is,
he's talking about what the government because we
don't get to decide what we're doing in
the foreign policy in the Middle East. Right?
So I agree with him though. By and
large, I think the world sees this and
sees what they are.
Alan McLeod
points out that
I think, again, same point everybody sees it,
but also the Israelis are beginning to recognize
that too.
As he says, war criminals fleeing to Argentina
to escape justice. Where have we heard that
one before?
Obviously, reference to Nazis. And the point is,
Israeli flees Brazil to Argentina to avoid war
crimes arrest warrant. That's from the 6th.
Here is a holocaust survivor, a Jewish holocaust
survivor who is speaking up to tell you
what she thinks about all this.
And you might not be surprised
if you've been following along.
So, yes, my name is Agnesh, and you
probably see me because I come every night
again.
I am a Jewish holocaust
child survivor,
Not as old as Stephen Kapush, whom you
all know,
but I'm catching up with him.
I'm I'm also a Holocaust researcher,
and I do a lot of
publications
and presentations
about the horrors of what happened during the
holocaust.
Last time, I did it 2 weeks ago
in a synagogue in Budapest.
It is precisely
because of what I know, what happened in
the Holocaust,
that
I am heartbroken
and protest
against what's happening now
against the
Palestinians.
It is horrendous, and all I can say
is that
Hanukkah lied. For me, Hanukkah is not only
the mock upist victory
above the Greeks.
It's also
light,
And let's hope that people will
see the light and stop the atrocities.
Thank you.
That's I mean and there's more plenty of
those examples. Right? I just don't know how
you could pretend what they wanna make this
out to be. Was she somehow a a
a a self hating Jew, an anti semite?
You know, they'll they will as far as
I could tell, they draw the line. I
haven't seen one of them ultimately end up
coming out and saying because I make the
point with this guy, for example. I say,
well, is this Jewish holocaust survivor? Is he
anti semite? And they usually just run away
and never answer because usually they're not honest.
Honest people are able to acknowledge what this
shows you. The holocaust survivor.
My message to the brave student protesters
in America is just keep doing it. Don't
give up. We are doing exactly the same.
And in the long term, we are going
to prevail.
And there's many of those examples. Standing with
the people at Columbia,
but except we're being told they were hating
every Jew that was around. I mean, it's
just such a crazy reality. That is the
evidence of how much Israel influences the conversation
in this country.
People like this have the courage to call
it out.
And they would people like Ben Shapiro would
call her trash like they did in the
beginning.
Now let's not forget, as anti war highlights,
despite all of this,
Israel
has gotten 22,000,000,000
that we can prove in military,
just military aid, since October 2023.
According to data from SIPRI,
u US weapons now account for 78%
of what Israel has in its arms.
80%.
That is not a
that's complicity in genocide, guys. And also very,
very illegal even according to US law, but
also international law. But just military aid just
since October 2023. $22,000,000,000.
That's where we are. Now, Saurad also points
out in regard to Lebanon. So now what
you're gonna see is the absurdity of people
like Matt Miller trying to make you care
about something else while pretending they care about
genocide.
So this is about, you know, ultimately,
the agreements.
He says the US condemns ceasefire violations in
Eastern Congo.
Oh, really? What about Lebanon? We don't care
about that one though. Right?
M 20 three's continued advances is taking basically,
he want he's trying to get you concerned
about this other topic. Well, not and which
matters, of course. But let's also not forget
how
explicitly
the US government is involved
and Israel in what's going on in the
Congo or Haiti or Sudan and every single
one of them.
And I mean, like, not some overarching point.
Some deliberate provable examples of what they're doing
and how they're overthrowing countries and how they
are destabilizing and what resources they're stealing.
But that's what Asarad points out. Israel has
violated Lebanon's ceasefire 100 times in just the
1st week. But you didn't see stupid Matt
Miller speak up then because they have an
agenda.
And they love to pretend like they care
about human life. They care about human rights
while they are literally committing a genocide.
That's my point as always. It is so
grotesque to not just I mean, being a
killer is disgusting. Being a killer who wants
praise for being a good person is the
worst of the worst.
Now here, as you've already probably already seen,
we've talked about this many times, Lebanon
was hit with white phosphorus almost 200
times. So it might be not not just
violations of cease fires, but, you know, chemical
weapons attacks, but we don't care about that
either, unless we can pretend it was Assad.
Be surprised if I told you Israel used
white phosphorus on Lebanon
almost 200 times in the space of a
year. You know, the incendiary weapon that's unlawful
in populated areas as it can burn its
victims to the bone? Well, it turns out
Israel hit at least 17
municipalities
with white phosphorus
covering around 10 square kilometers. And the most
intense bombardment
was in the weeks just after October 7
2023,
well before Israel's invasion of Lebanon in October
of this year. That's what Lebanese researcher Ahmed
Beydoun and environmental
activist group Green Southerners have discovered, and they
say it's not random. Have a look at
this map. These are the places Israel bombed
with white phosphorus,
then look at Israel's so called no go
zone. This is the area Israel's banned Lebanese
civilians from returning to despite the ceasefire with
Hezbollah.
And the allegation is that Israel has created
the buffer zone it always wanted in Southern
Lebanon
by using white phosphorus
to poison the environment.
As early as January, Lebanese farmers started testing
their land.
They found the whole area you can see
here is contaminated.
Here's one of the farmers.
Israel says it uses phosphorus munitions
to create smoke screens on the battlefield.
But in potentially making this border region uninhabitable,
Lebanon's environment minister has accused Israel of committing
ecocide.
This war may have ended, but for the
people of Southern Lebanon,
the danger isn't over.
Many obvious report points there. I mean, the
point obvious being is why were they bombing
Lebanon then with white phosphorus or not
before the start? Because it's been going on
long before October 7th, guys. They've been coveting
this land, and they've been attacking these people.
They've been occupying Lebanon long before this.
Right? Or the idea that they're trying to
commit, like, using this to literally destroy the
area or bombing where civilians are. There's no
smoke screen. It's such a a
there are other elements that produce better smoke
that aren't murderous. It's provable.
They're just giving you a lazy argument because
the group that would normally go after this
or pretend to care about it when they
want to when it benefits them, the US,
doesn't care.
They're the ones working with them. And you
can see on here, this goes back to
2,009 and well before. This is human rights
watch, rate of fire, Israel's unlawful use of
white phosphorus in Gaza. Here is October 12th.
Israel, white phosphorus used in Lebanon and Gaza.
Weird. Why were they attacking Lebanon? Same point,
guys. It's just it's also documented.
We're watching terrorists get away with terrorism.
Now, in that point though, the Congo, for
example, that Matt Miller wants you to look
to. Right? Look at them violating agreements, which
probably are happening. The point is that that's
important to understand that there
is a US agenda seeding through that location.
And I'm not gonna get into it today.
It's a whole conversation, but you can watch
what we talked about here.
February 8th this year
or rather, excuse me. I'm forgetting that it's
2025. So the the 8th of last year,
Haiti fights to end western exploitation.
Congo continues to be manipulated, and Israel defeated
itself with the same part of the conversation.
Oh, you can watch this one. Here's another
one. US is rarely implicated in Congo coup,
May 20th 2024.
And just a general one from 2019,
US interim government coups in Venezuela, Syria, Yemen,
Congo, etcetera. This is not a new conversation,
guys.
Now here's Antony Blinken, and this one will
probably make you
angry.
He says, yesterday, after reviewing
the horrifying information of suffering inside Sudan,
I have concluded that members of the rapid
support voice forces are allied and allied militias
have committed genocide in Sudan. The United States
has committed to pursue an accountability. Oh, I
mean, there's so many ways to make fun
of this. Now, first of all, no one
should try to pretend like that's not happening.
Because just like and what's funny is they
love to make the argument. No. Like like
what's his name? Fetterman. I just I'm just
so embarrassed for this person, how clearly he's
not even control what's happening around him. He's
just like a he's like a weekend at
Bernie's automaton being used to make narratives. The
point
is that clearly when he goes, nobody cared
about this one. You're protesting here worth the
yes. They are, stupid. It's everywhere. And we
and plenty of those independent media have been
screaming about what's going on there in many
different examples, but don't let the facts get
in the way of your narrative for Israel
though. All that APAC money, I'm sure, would
bring a hole in your pocket.
The important reality is Sudan is a problem.
But then ask yourself why it has been
this way for so long, and you begin
to realize, oh, it's because the US and
Israel have their fingerprints all over I mean,
explicitly all over what's happening there.
Don't forget what just happened over the last
so many years. The same group they're talking
about here. Right? So the Sudan's estate sponsor
of terrorism because they're trying to coerce them
into joining Israel. Right?
Okay. And how many times have I said
this? Nothing changes.
The same problems, the same situation, the same
groups, and they just go, we'll take you
off the list if you normalize with Israel.
Same point as always. Either that means they
were never terrorists and you used that to
force them to work with Israel, or they
were terrorists and you didn't care if they
were as long as they worked with Israel
because you could prove that it was the
same circumstance. There's no way to misunderstand that.
Now that it didn't happen because these groups
were all trying to be strong armed and
agreeing to a group that hates them,
they go, well, now you're terrorists again. So
bad guy.
And, by the way, the point is the
groups they're supporting are the terrorists, as usual.
And we've gone over this in so many
different ways. They're and it doesn't mean that
the other side is any better at this
point. They they've destabilized
this area
into a I mean, it's like with Libya.
You got warring
warlords taking over certain areas with war tribes.
I mean, it's it's just they've devolved it
down to something that's easily manipulated from the
outside because they're powerful. That's what they want.
Meanwhile, the people that were supposed to be
saved in Libya became the open slaves in
the slave market. Or what do you think
is happening to the Sudanese people right now
while they're doing this?
Or in Haiti, for example, like Dan Cohen's
been highlighting. They're the ones creating all of
this and then turning around and going, look
at these cannibals and and and making up
entire stories to make you think they're all
maniacs. All
terrorists and and cannibals and and, what's the
word?
Savages.
When in reality,
that Jimmy guy is actually the only one
there seemingly trying to fight for the people
of the area as Dan has been relentlessly
trying to show. But you know what? It
doesn't matter because
they get what they want from it. Funny
how they're not screaming for elections in Haiti.
Once it once a decade since they have
an election? Why don't they care about that
election and freedom and because they get what
they want from it.
In this case,
don't talk about Israel. Right? But we're gonna
make this case about Sudan. So that's the
first point in general,
that obviously they care about one not the
other, Or that obviously they're jumping to point
out
a group they were just trying to tell
you was not terrorists because they wanted to
align with Israel. But how about the big
elephant in the room? How about the fact
that asking how in the world did Blinken
deduce it was a genocide? Aren't we supposed
to wait for official channels? Didn't Matt Miller
tell us we're supposed to wait for every
single bomb and every single engagement to be
flushed out and researched so before we can
come back and get yeah. We remember all
of that tap dancing. Right? Now they can
go genocide, like they did with Russia.
Oh, it's genocide. We know it. We all
know it for sure. Genocide. Okay. Then we
see the real genocide and they act like
we have to be sure. We have to
investigate, which, by the way, we should.
But just recognize
how flimsy this is. That they really jumped
to make it about genocide without any real
investigation, without real evidence because they want it
to be.
And Muhammad Shahada says literally every single one
of the crimes that you cite in their
discussion
to conclude a genocide is happening in Sudan
are all being committed by Israel in Gaza.
The very genocide you have been proudly funding,
arming, and covering up. 1, leaving 638,000
Sudanese experiencing the worst famine in their history.
Right? And nobody should be okay with that.
And the reason it's happening is because of
the US government and Israel and other western
forces
exploiting Sudan for their own benefit.
Easy to prove, and I'll include the articles
where we go over this. Robert's article from
the 2023,
the US is heavily involved in Sudan's renewed
turmoil. Western media omit this, as well as
the one from 2024.
The US and Israeli hand in Sudan's horrifying
civil war.
These are important, guys, because as usual, the
TLAB was ahead of the curve on highlighting
where this is now being used.
I'll share these for people to get those
out now because they're forcing this into the
conversation.
Robert doing amazing work.
So the point, obviously, was they're responsible for
this. At the end of the day though,
there's millions of people starving in Gaza.
According to even the IPC, right? Oops.
I already looked at it but I'll keep
it open just in case. Here's the art
here's the
Gaza Strip information, right? So this is the
group
literally it's their job. It's actually their job
to identify these things. Integrated food security phase
classification. This group is openly telling you. Gaza
Strip, famine is imminent. 1,100,000
people. This was from May of 2024.
You think Blinken doesn't know that? So you
have a report from the lead the the
leading entity on genocide on famine rather, excuse
me, telling you, 1,100,000
seems correct me if I'm wrong, ladies and
gentlemen, but 1,100,000
seems like more than 638,000.
So he doesn't care. It's not up for
debate, guys. It's transparent.
Number 2, leaving tens of 1,000 dead. Yeah.
That's pretty damn obvious what's going on in
Gaza. Direct attacks against civilians.
Do I even need to comment? Number 4,
systematically murdered men and boys, even infants on
ethnic basis. Yes. That's literally what they're doing,
and we can all see it. Targeting fleeing
civilians, whether October 7th or every day afterward.
Preventing remaining civilians from accessing life saving supplies.
They just proudly promoted that.
Number 7, mass rape, sexual violence.
Unreal.
I mean, he's almost getting ratioed. I mean,
it's just just crazy. You realize and this
is my point about blinking. You you he's
not stupid. He knows he's being used. He's
the one trotting out these things that everyone
makes fun of. Like, he'll probably get it
the one going to prison.
While the Biden and the Trump's don't get,
you know, or the Netanyahu's
don't get held accountable. That's usually how this
works.
He also Tiberius responds saying, of course, they're
committing genocide in Sudan. Which this is the
point. They always love to make it out
like we only care about 1 because we
hate Jews or whatever stupid flimsy narrative they're
trying to force to hide the Zionist genocide.
But that's not true. You look at Tiberias,
he's talking about Sudan more than once. So
have I. So have a lot of people.
So have Dan Cohen because we care about
anybody suffering.
Because it's just a huge shame that the
US is also committing genocide in Gaza, and
so nobody can reasonably take you seriously, Blinken.
You have sacrificed international law everywhere for your
little colony in the Middle East.
Asal Ragh, highlighting the same thing, simply goes,
you're committing genocide as you post this. AMIS
International.
Israel committing genocide in Gaza with full US
support. That was their own independent
report. Not even on this is the ICC.
We have the ICJ. Amnesty came out with
their own report on December 6th and said
this is genocide.
Now here is little Fetterman.
0 dopes
have shown up at my home or office,
or blocked their road to chant and protest
over actual genocide in Sudan.
But you're wrong though. Right? So who cares
about the facts? Let's just make a narrative
to call you all dopes for protesting against
genocide. Like, think about how dumb it is
even if you're wrong about it to call
somebody a dope for protesting against what they
think is genocide.
It just shows you how flimsy this is.
This guy has a clear agenda to blindly
support Israel. And it shouldn't be surprising why
somebody of such low intellect is easy to
manipulate.
But the bottom line is that he is
trying to say that nobody supports this one
or fights against fights something, calls for jet
awareness around this one, and he's
spectacularly
wrong.
But he goes,
South Africa engaged with the ICJ over of
Gaza, but not for actual genocide on their
own continent?
You have to realize how frustrating it is
for them to try to muddy the waters
around people, things that people don't broadly understand.
Yeah. That's technically not even true, but the
reality is ultimately that this is something that
they process. It's not just a flimsy thing.
And on top of that, that what we
can see is a huge building case around
what Israel's been doing for a very long
time.
But one does not make one not saying
let's just say everything he's saying is true.
It does not invalidate the genocide. That's what
I think is so funny about this. Is
your point actually that genocide's okay as long
as you don't care about the other genocide?
This just shows you how desperate they are
to try to make it out to be
that we or really the game is trying
to make it out to be that there's
no genocide. We just hate Jewish people.
Despite major Jewish organizations calling this out. Despite,
you know, on and on and on and
on. It's just it doesn't. That's why this
is failing, and they're all being seen through.
But then, of course, the main point, Elon
says, good question.
Is it? I mean, how embarrassing that you
have to align with Federman.
And it's not a good question. It's a
lazy, unflooded I mean, I'll just what I
wrote. I said, wild that you're willing to
make yourself look this ignorant, this lacking of
basic knowledge and deductive logic just to support
a clumsy and desperate argument all about obfuscating
Israel's genocide. You could not be more obvious.
And so let's clear for the podcast, that's
in response to Elon Musk saying good question
to Federman saying something incredibly stupid.
With the little graphic just saying, I see
you. Right? I think we all see him
right now.
All these articles about the Sudan, understand what's
going on. It's important. Now Jason Basler makes
an important point in this little segment.
Just going back to Iraq and plenty of
other locations. Same thing we should think about
when we see what they're doing in the
Sudan, what they're doing in Iraq, what they're
doing everywhere we're talking about. As he says,
before the US invaded Iraq in 2003,
there had never been a suicide bombing in
Iraqi history.
You can look this up for yourself. I
think Avi Shalam has made points about this
before. It says between 2,032,010,
there were 1,892
suicide bombings,
killing 12 hun 12,284
civilians.
US foreign policy has a 100%
success rate at turning sovereign nations into bleeding
grounds for tear breeding grounds for terror. Now
the point, first of all, is to recognize
that, well, if it wasn't happening before,
even if it is actually just random Iraqis,
well, that simply shows you people desperate to
stop an invading force. Right? But on top
of that, realize that what I'm gonna show
you is this is not because of Iraqi
or Muslim terror. It's about a Zionist agenda
that has bled into this conversation.
And that's been documented by academics
more than once.
But the next thing is to realize that
even if you believe what they're saying,
they still failed. Right? So let's just say
it's all what they tell you it is.
Well, they took, they invaded, they occupied, they're
they won in quotes. Right? So why did
it get worse? Well, there's only 1 of
2 options. Either they
let it get worse, or I guess maybe
3,
allowed it to get worse than or deliberately
made it worse, or
they're just this bad at what they do,
and they can't stop it. Either way, what's
the point? They shouldn't be invading countries, but
they we all know that's none of it's
true. The point is, I think they well,
I guess you could say that they made
it happen is what I would argue.
That they did this or rather through other
elements working through them allowed this to become
the reality that has destroyed the Middle East,
destroyed most of the world in a lot
of ways.
But here is a couple of experts telling
you exactly what I'm saying. The Zionists have
used it and brought it, in fact, to
the area. Terrorism as we know it today,
the planting of bombs in marketplaces and so
on and so forth, was in fact introduced
into the Middle East by the Zionists in
the twenties.
But the net result of of Zionist,
terrorism and and violence in the in the
1st 3rd of 20th century has brought forth,
to my mind, the the anomaly,
the
horrific
and unacceptable status in the Middle East today
of the state of Israel, which is in
fact an armed garrison state, which now exports
more arms and distributes violence all around the
world,
vastly disproportionate to its size. I mean, in
that respect, I think it's a it's it's
a horrible cycle of of violence. But in
it all, I think the Palestinian is the
victim. There's no question about that.
Now just look at this picture. Right? It's
so interesting. Like,
why in the world would they be wearing,
like, hazmat suit masks?
Well, because then you'd be able to if
you didn't, you could see their faces. And
we've already caught this just post October 7th
where they have dressed up like this. We
just played one for you or the one
where they dressed up like Palestinians to invade
the hospital. This is not new. In fact,
even Israeli media has covered this for decades.
How often Mas'ad dresses up like Hezbollah,
Hamas, Palestinians in order
to infiltrate or maybe to carry out false
flags, which we know they're actively doing. I
mean, no as a fact because they've been
caught, because it's been highlighted, because it's been
reported on by Israeli media and plenty of
other investigative reporters. My point though is you
can see where this really stems from and
how obviously it's it's a facade, guys.
So on the on another note, let's not
forget that we have other I mean, I
could go off an entire I have had
shows about this, but for hours about how
Israel and United States have created.
What is Al Qaeda which became ISIS in
the same conversation? They are the same thing.
We created ISIS.
I mean, ISIS
is no less than,
the people up in Islamberg, no less than
Golan, is a CIA creation.
I'm John McCain, for heaven's sake, was over
there with the with the ISIS officials. We
created them. They came from the Al Narsai
group, the, Syrian
Liberation Front.
The these two organizations combined, and they they
they morphed into ISIS. It's our creation. We
create them. We still direct them. When
ISIS
warriors are injured in in battle, where are
they transported?
They're transported, for heaven's sake, to Israel.
They're treated by the Israelis and Israeli hospitals
and brought back to battle. The rebels have
admitted, acknowledged that they've been supported by Israel,
and they they thanked Israel for helping them
throughout. In fact, arms are oftentimes caught Israeli
arms are caught on, you know, en route
to the rebel groups. But when it come
Yeah. And then this it it's funny as
people love to go, that's not true, and
it's literally reported by Jerusalem Post. Israel treating
Al Qaeda fighters wounded in Syria war.
It could not be. And now we're literally
watching them proud, like, work with the Al
Qaeda terrorists to take control of Syria. And
we're all everyone's trying to act like we
don't see what's going on.
But that's former intelligence telling you that. Right?
Here and there's Craig Murray telling you the
same thing.
Well, there's no doubt
that the so called rebel forces,
attacking the government in Syria
are creatures of the United States and of
Israel. That's Hadi al Shom. That's Al Qaeda.
Same conversation. Now if you remember
that well, at least what what he was
just saying a second ago, the CIA created
this route. Okay. So, yeah, it's very true.
Right? But you have to ask yourself where
the origin point comes from. Now it could
be both, but it's important to remember this.
And this was I've played this before. This
is on c SPAN for crying out loud.
Like, this was discussed publicly in a way
that people didn't even connect the dots for
back then, but I think it becomes clear
now, or it could just be a coincidence.
It's up for you to decide. Lords and
others.
You tell the story about how you try
to find out what the
what they call the Mossad when they deal
with, publicly? I thought it was a reasonable
question, but the trouble is, you can't pick
up the phone book. There's no, Langley in,
in Israel that you can look up, you
know, CIA or in our case, the Mossad.
We thought we should ask, what shall we
call it in English? Which can translate the
Hebrew words, as I said, Mossad is institute.
But when they write a letter to their
friends in the CIA or the British intelligence,
what do they call themselves? It took a
while. It was a matter of asking the
prime minister's spokesman. The best you could do
because officially,
the Mossad is under the prime minister's office.
And, I think he sort of wondered why
he wanna know and all that, so we
explained. And he came up with, the Israeli
Secret Intelligence Service. And if it were to
have initials, it would be ISIS.
Just simple words like that. Interestingly enough, a
kind of a British model.
Could be coincidence, of course.
But what's interesting to me to bring this
into the other part of the conversation, right,
just to recognize, first of all, how obvious
what we're highlighting is. Right? The influence of
the conversation, how much Israel is infiltrated, influencing
all over the world
despite how obviously they're committing one of the
I mean, the most egregious crime you could
speak of. I it's just transparent.
So think about what that shows you, the
control over government outcome policy,
media coverage. And if you wanna pretend that's
about Jewish people alone, that's a lie that
you're creating for yourself. That's not what I'm
saying. That's not even the truth. It's very
clearly the Zionist overlapped to all these. More
Christian Zionists today than there are Jewish Zionists.
And if you can't acknowledge that, then I
think you have an agenda. But realize that
this overlaps to everything else we're discussing today.
And I think it's important in the just
the US centric side of this or the
social media aspect, the the new administration, it's
important to get into where this goes in
that regard. Now we're gonna talk about the
US
the current administration incoming. And the idea of
Greenland and all these different weird, partisan psychological
operations that appear to, in some cases, be
very real.
But we're gonna go over that and what
that even means.
But what I think, first of all, is
important is that we're seeing, in the case
of these misrepresentations,
things like this.
Now despite how obviously
Trump has just doubled, tripled, quadrupled down, whatever,
if that even makes sense, on supporting Israel
over and over and over and over.
And despite all that, he can come out
or rather what what happens here, which is
interesting, is he tweets without commentary on truth
social, a video
that just that that is, Jeffrey Sachs
speaking about something, but specifically aiming to Obama
era outcome, which I think is a whole
point here. We'll get into the full picture,
and that's the whole point of the partisan
misrepresentation.
But, nonetheless,
criticizing Netanyahu.
And so my point is this. He comes
out with a video that does have truth
in it. Right? But, clearly, I think he's
trying to, without commentary, make you think he's
highlighting Israel so the q's hue head on
circle go see, save Israel for last, and
allows everything to continue. Trust the plan. Right?
But the reality being that he wants he
just he wants you to think that he
supports someone. The reality being that ultimately,
he or as I said it fast, wants
you to think that he's going to fight
them, but the reality
being that he absolutely will continue to support
Israel. This video is meant to kinda just
keep the extend that issue, extend the illusion,
while making it's the video kinda slant one
way while omitting the bigger picture. Now, again,
the overarching point is if he has consistently
to this very moment,
it's it's let's look at it this way.
He has always supported the shot nonstop.
Right up until this very day, the shot
saved lives and everything on and on. Now
if today, he came out and and and
shared a video
that said,
Fauci Fauci was a liar and the shots
killed people with no commentary. Would that suddenly
invalidate everything that he's done? Would you suddenly
convince yourself that he secretly knows and it's
all part of the plan? Why?
Or is that just to get you to
do that so we can keep going in
the same direction, hoping that you muddy the
waters for him?
At the very least, why you would assume
what that's supposed to mean? I don't know.
That's very bad. It's that is, irresponsible.
But it's
what's the right word? Self sabotaging almost.
So let's play the clip, and then we'll
go over what the real the full picture
is with what Jeffrey Sachs and everything else
is highlighted. But just ask yourself as you
know, and what you're gonna see is people
like this going, wow. Trump just posted a
video of how Netanyahu was responsible for dragging
America into the war, which kinda, like, my
god, how obvious that is. In the video,
the man describes Netanyahu as a deep, dark
son of a bee.
Right? So it's good. Right? It's good. He
shared it. It's good. Some people are seeing
it. But I think what your highlight what
we're seeing is the fact that they're losing
control of the narrative and that Trump needs
some of the base that he's losing to
think he secretly will go after Israel just
to keep this moving even though he is
not.
They wanted the war
all the time. They had to figure out
how to sell the war to the American
people, how to scare the shit out of
the American people. It was a phony war.
Where did that war come from? You know
what? It's quite surprising. That war came from
Netanyahu actually.
You know that? It's weird.
And the way it is is that Netanyahu
had from 1995 onward the theory
that the only way we're gonna get rid
of Hamas and Hezbollah
is by toppling the governments that support them.
That's Iraq,
Syria, and Iran.
And the guy's nothing if not obsessive.
Right. Now you could argue that maybe he
just discovered this, which I mean, are we
really gonna pretend that with all the influence
and all of the resources and all of
the base? No. Certainly possible, though.
But realize so did he just discovers this?
I mean, maybe maybe he just posted going
now now. Will that change everything? That's what
we should wait for. Action. Is he gonna
come out tomorrow and go, never mind. Vance
and I now don't wanna go after Iran
because we realized Netanyahu's tricked us. Or will
they continue the same policy?
And maybe you'll still secretly think because this
one video with no commentary that maybe it
won't end up like that despite them continuing
to fight for the same agenda. Or Vance
and Trump coming out hot and saying Iran
needs to do this. Or they return to
hostages or everything will go crazy in the
Middle East. So if you somehow secretly know
that it's all a ploy, then why are
you continuing the same agendas?
I really hope that we have that, you
know, enough discernment to recognize that this being
posted does not change anything unless he actually
changes something.
And we're he's still trying to get us
to fight Iran this day, this week.
He's a deep, dark son of a bitch,
sorry to tell you. Because he's gotten us
into endless wars
and because of
the power of all of this, in the
US politics,
he's gotten his way. But that war was
totally phony. So what is this democracy versus
dictatorship? Come on. This is these are not
even sensible term.
So here's another one. Same point. MJ Truth
Ultra on his huge Trump supporting accounts just
goes, oh, boy. Did Trump just expose Netanyahu
and Israel's influence on American politics? Like, that's
sad.
Like, this has been one of the most
spectacularly
public conversations.
It since, well before October 7th, but very
clearly now. And so Trump posted without commentary
and a limited example of it. And Trump
exposes Netanyahu? Like, not the genocide, not the
lying, not the not every single example you've
caught, not the many different indictments or that
Israeli politics in general are telling you he's
a villain. None of that. But that Trump
posts a video without commentary. Wow. Everything's exposed.
I mean, guys, we have to realize how
broken this whole thing is and how partisans
are I mean, like, the team sports side
of it, which I don't think is the
majority,
are
enamored, lost, brainwashed, whatever you wanna call it,
on the Trump does nothing and that changes
everything kinda thing. It's wild.
Trump shared a clip of Jeffrey Sachs discussing
how, again, Obama and Netanyahu
orchestrated wars. You see, that's how he's doing
this.
Couldn't have been also the republican side or
all through Trump's administration.
Obama, democrat, bad. Netanyahu, bad. As it pertains
to democrats. That's that's the game.
Partisan misrepresentation.
And you can read it. It's a Wall
Street Apes clip clip. That's why it was
shared. It's because Wall Street Apes is a
huge, influential, Trump leaning, Musk supporting entity.
And he simply goes on to say, Jeffrey
Sachs is in more detail about how Barack
Obama commanded the
it's just so guys, it goes it goes
well before Barack Obama into a public administration
and well after Obama into a public administration,
well through Trump's administration as well. All doing
the same thing. So let's get into some
full truth, not half partisan truth, but big
picture stuff. What you've already I've already oh,
actually, I forgot this too. I'm gonna play
you a bunch of clips, by the way.
This is from Sachs as well as, other
people. But just in case you forgot, right,
we're gonna over here pretend like he suddenly
just now realized Netanyahu is bad,
then explain I mean, again, maybe you think
today all of a sudden it shifted, even
though this is wildly public information. Let's not
forget
the 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8, 9, 10, 11, 12 different examples show
you that that's not the case.
To read, you can watch for yourself. I'll
play the one you've seen many times, just
the beginning of it, to recognize that he's
saying, I don't know how you could pretend
this opinion could change based on what you
just showed. That he thinks that Israel is
supposed to control US congress. No. The biggest,
change I've seen in congress is Israel
literally owned congress. You understand that 10 years
ago, 15 years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And I think you know exactly what
I what I'm saying.
They had such power. Israel had such power
and rightfully
overcome
I still find that to be so wild.
And it's backed up by many other examples
doing the same exact thing. How do you
think con Israel could rightfully have control over
congress?
Willful
ignorance, guys. Willful ignorance.
If you see this and you hear it
and it doesn't scare you, then you're being
willfully ignorant. That is absolutely not America first.
So here's one I've already played more than
once. And this this is just giving you
the bigger picture. Right? And it goes well
back through Trump's administration.
It goes to the main point.
America has been fighting Israel's wars for decades.
That means well through Trump's administration, meaning Trump
was doing the same thing. That's the that's
the real picture.
Believe it or not. And again, in case
you're just tuning in, this is not about
making it about Trump. It's about trying to
highlight that it's Trump and Biden and Obama
and Bush, that your government,
all of it. That's what we're talking about.
It's just simply that that's the part being
boxed out right now for obvious current reasons.
But hear it as
there is no left and right in the
context of your government and its agendas. That's
the point.
Weird as it sounds, the US has been
fighting Israel's wars for decades. It's been a
disaster for the United States, 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars.
By the way, the Israel lobby puts in,
you know, a $100,000,000,
and it gets out trillions on the other
side of absolutely
horrendous,
useless, reckless
wars fought on Israel's behalf. Well, Netanyahu would
as I said, he doesn't view it as
a failure because the US keeps complying. It
keeps going along with this. It it hasn't
stood up and said, you ruined us in
2003. You promised we'd take out Saddam Hussein
and all would be well. Okay. So ask
yourself, why?
The same one I'm making today. And I
think it's the same reason, even all the
way back then. Why would they have not
been like, okay. We're done with this.
You you bombed our our ship, USS Liberty.
Right? You you carried out these false flags.
You you steal our nuclear technology. I mean,
over and over and over.
Why wouldn't they go no more?
There's only real I mean, I've just I
mean, there's plenty of other thing there's plenty
of things you could argue would make that
make sense. To me, the most logical is
that they're compromised. That people are either blackmailed,
influenced, put in position when they're not actually
like like a Brian Mast dynamic. Literally part
of the IDF. I don't know why that's
not alarming to people.
I don't know how else you make sense
of that. You told us to take out
Bashar al Assad. We tried to do that,
and that was in 2011. And we're 13
years later, and we're still at war. You
told us to take out more of our
Gaddafi, and we did that 13 years ago.
And now there's still chaos.
Yeah. Right. And now we have Syria, which
is literally run by the the terrorist organizations
that we were told they were fighting. And
then you got Libya that has never recovered
that is of open slave markets and warring
tribes.
Freedom. Right? Right? That that's what Netanyahu's version
about the outcome for freedom is using the
US to batter them down. You have done
such destruction, mister Netanyahu. Stop it. We don't
say that. No. So he just keeps doing
this. And maybe and I I'm sure that
he thinks, ah, with with Donald Trump, now
I can really do it. Now we'll go
to war with Iran.
The other
That is the full picture you're not gonna
get from the partisan slant.
Side of this was the idea that, yes,
we'll do that for Syria, Libya,
Iraq,
Iran,
but the Saudis will come with a maybe
and I I'm sure that he thinks, ah,
with with Donald Trump, now I can really
do it. Now we'll go to war with
Iran.
The other side of this was the idea
that, yes, we'll do that for Syria, Libya,
Iraq,
Iran.
But the Saudis will come with us for
free. You know? We'll give them some,
some, weapon systems, maybe a defense pact, and
they'll sign on. That was also the idea
of Trump and Biden. No difference between the
2, in approach.
But that's over if it was ever realistic.
It's completely over. That's what the crown prince's
statement
today, but he's been making it repeatedly
in recent months. It's over. Now
I don't know whether the Trump people
understand this or not. Who knows? But they're
gonna find out, and Netanyahu is gonna find
out. And all of this is an extraordinarily
reckless behavior, and Netanyahu has been one of
the most destructive forces in world politics for
a long time now, and he's done a
lot of damage to the United States. Thank
you. And it's time for him to shut
up, basically, to stop trying to bring the
United States into war.
And his latest is to bring it into
war with Iran.
Exactly.
Very transparent. And then what do you hear?
Hezbollah, January 6th, and Iran, and Vance comes
out, Iran. And they go and Netanyahu stands
up in Syria and says, Iran's Iranians, you
should fight back in through government.
I see it's it's just so wildly obvious.
Here's another one. Now this is one for
posted today from judge Napoliano. It says yesterday,
president-elect Donald Trump posted on truth social a
clip that we just showed showed you of
Jeffrey Sachs' recent comments on Syria at the
Cambridge Student Union.
The staff of judging freedom offers this in
addition
related to Israel's genocide. So, see, the same
point. People like judge Napoliano
were like, that's a half picture.
Right? You're using his words to slant it.
So he wants to give you the full
picture. It just makes me happy to see
that there are other people out there that
have the integrity to recognize, to call these
things out.
Hold on.
And in general, I think, DePauliano, you know,
in the in the past, I was,
you know, seemed partisan, you know, and I
was very skeptical in general, I think. But
I think over the years, he's really come
to, you know, at least in my opinion,
shown that he he's object he cares. He
calls things out. Like, it's important. Question everybody
as always, guys. But I think it's important
to see that that's, you know, consistency matters
to me.
This hold back
a moral one, a legal one, is it
significant, or is it just politics?
Well, I I think that the,
revulsion
worldwide
in what Israel is doing
And the realization, which I think is at
the core,
that what Israel is doing is in the
service
of a political agenda. This is the most
important thing to keep in mind. Wars
come from politics.
The Israeli politics right now is an extremist
politics, which says
Israel will rule over the Palestinian
people,
those who are not expelled or those who
are not killed.
So this is so called greater Israel.
It's a disaster, Israel,
but that's the politics.
The politics is completely unacceptable.
It's completely illegal. It's completely unsustainable,
but that's what the war is about. Rather
than having a political solution, Israel thinks that
it can do this by war. It can't.
It can only do this by war if
the United States is completely
complicit in this. So when you ask, does
the UK mean it?
All over the world,
the publics
want this fighting to stop. This is dangerous
for everybody. It's murderous when it comes to
the Palestinians, but it's dangerous for the whole
world. Everybody wants after all these decades,
stop the damn fighting.
Stop the killing because you're threatening
global peace. You're threatening an escalation
to world war, and we're not gonna stand
there and do this so that Israel can
have an apartheid regime or commit ethnic cleansing
or commit genocide in Gaza. No.
So this is what's happening country by country.
The United States is the last holdout. If
the United States took an active policy for
peace,
peace would come because
the United States would say with the rest
of the world, this is how it's gonna
be. International
law. 2 states, 4th June 1967
borders.
State of Palestine, a 194th
UN member state, capital in East Jerusalem. It's
all there, the solution on the table. The
US is the last holdout.
Couldn't be more clear.
I'm glad he shared that.
You know, it's it's just so it's the
point is, guys, that right now, everything about
his administration is blind support for Israel. I
it no honest person could deny that. And
so and here's just another example, and I
wanna make this point at the end of
this part of the segment. That, you know,
you know, I was talking about the idea
of, like, opportunists. Like, this is how I
see most politicians. And I know I'm I
know I'm jaded. I think we have a
reason to be around who what they what
politicians are in general.
But I hold out hope for, you know,
that there's somebody that will surprise me, which
on a side note is funny how to
watch the DC Draino kind of engagement with
Massie, which is so funny. Out of every
one of them, he's the best example even
if I still have my concerns. And he's
the one they go after for being just
the right the whole thing in the right
led the the left the partisan paradigm dynamic
seems to be imploding right now. Thank god.
But what's interesting is the opportunism. Right? I'm
talking about politicians
where you get these examples of politicians that,
you know, would would I guess, tend to
kinda challenge what you might expect would be
the norm in order to gain some momentum,
to get people like us to go, oh,
this guy knows even if it's just because
he wants that attention.
You know, tapping into the conspiracy side of
things or whatever it is like Trump did
before his first election, and is kinda doing
the same thing now. So the the point
is
my I I was kind of saying we
should try to lean into those people. Right?
Find these smaller politicians
that whether or not they actually care,
knowing that you're always, you know, skeptical of
whether they really care or not, lean into
this anybody saying the right thing.
Right? And don't not just then trust whatever
they do, but give them some promotion and
say, look. This guy know he's calling out
what's going on in Syria. This woman is
calling out what's going on in Syria or
Israel or whatever.
And then
showing other new politicians, okay. Well, this guy
got all this attention, all this flood of
support because he's saying the thing. Even though
APAC's after him. Even though he might there's
still momentum there. My point is that that
might be a way to get that going
away from what's happening, whether you know, and
the point is they then go a different
direction. You go, well, I don't trust that.
I don't agree with that. But lean into
that. You get what I'm saying. Right? So
my point is,
this is an example of how that's how
it's not happening right now, I think. That
ultimately, that momentum doesn't exist, not enough.
Now it could just be that this guy
just obviously gets
$70,000 from APAC. But this is I've never
heard of this guy, some kind of no
name politician.
Congressman Nick La Lotta, maybe you know who
he is.
Father, husband, navy veteran, proud serving people of
Long Island in congress. Okay. So he comes
out of the 7th for whatever reason. It
goes, the ICC's arrest warrants for Israel leaders
are an affront to justice. Okay. You're a
little behind the curve here, bud. That was
a while ago. The point is that he
just, for some reason, got tapped, and he
just goes,
their narrative. Their their affront to justice. The
ICC, you know, arresting Netanyahu's wrong.
It's weird. Right? Seems that it seems that
I don't know where. I think it's because,
obviously, people get tapped. And they go, you
I need you to say this. And they
go, as Massey himself came out and said,
funny how they're attacking him, the APAC guy.
Right? They've all got an APAC guy.
So he says, continuing, Havas is October 7th
atrocities. Same thing. Over 1200 lives lost. Even
Israeli doesn't claim excuse me. Is even Israel
doesn't claim that anymore.
But yet the narrative is the same. Interesting.
And, of course, 96 hostages still held even
though what's interesting as I think there's reports
now finding dead bodies that are Israelis and
Gaza. Guys, they've been bombing relentlessly. And you
could prove by their own maps, they've bombed
everywhere.
So I don't I don't even know how
any of them are still alive. Their own
hostages have told you they're bombing hostages.
But the narrative this is an area that
only exists within politicians
and Netanyahu, apparently,
and the media they control. But it says
demand accountability. America stands with Israel, gives terrorism.
My point is,
if this person recognized more of a benefit
because clearly he's an opportunist
in the side of calling the other side
out? Maybe he would do that. But right
now, it's still more of a benefit to
these people to just blindly support the narrative
even when the world sees them. So think
about that.
That to me shows me they don't care
about votes. They care about Israeli support.
Because right now, they're I guarantee you, more
people don't support this than they do. That's
clear in the world. And yet, still, politicians
go, Israel good.
You still think your vote counts? I mean,
we should be questioning these things, guys.
Now, to switch over to the other conversation.
Interesting. Because I think all of this is
very interconnected.
But right now, I was pointing this out
on a wake up the other day. Myron
Gaines came out and said, let's call a
spade a spade. Now, whatever you think about
Myron Gaines, that's point is not supporting him
or what he thinks or is that, you
know, the content. It's about a person who
was very supportive of Elon Musk
now calling him out. That's important. I think
that shows something very important. Now he says
this random
interest by Elon Musk
in a decade old problem in the UK
and Tommy Robinson
is a diversion to keep attention away from
the fact that he is silencing dissidents on
the h one b visa controversy and anti
Zionist views. We aren't stupid.
I mean, this guy this guy has
216,000 followers.
So the point is clearly, it's not a
non problem. What's going on in the UK
is just as important as what's going on
in the United States. In the context to
covering up the sexual manipulation, the sexual blackmail,
pedophile networks. These are not fake stories, guys,
as much as they get slanted because it
sounds crazy to some people.
The reality, though,
is it's very real. And what's going on
in the UK, which is a huge age
old problem as we've had great interviews with
Gareth Ike, for example, or Richard Willett, and
the reality of how far back that goes.
That's not to say that it's not what
you're talking about. What's important to highlight is
what he's saying. That whatever it is or
however important, we don't we're not dumb enough
to think that you just lurch into this
conversation in the midst of us seeing what
you were doing.
And weren't we just being yelled at for
cock talking about Israel where we should care
about the United States and now you talk
about the UK for a week? It's just
it's all the same thing. Or anti Zionist
views. The censorship is clear and that has
become exposed. Some people can't put that genie
back in the bottle.
And yet,
we're not stupid.
He is doing that to get attention away
from other things. But there's plenty of other
conservators
that are saying, what about the sexual issues
here? What about the sexual issues you ignore
in Israel or in Palestine? You know, all
the different ways you could highlight the hypocrisy
of all this.
But that's just to point out that clearly
people are going,
we're not buying this. Major accounts, and it
is a lot of them. But the h
one b overlap, this is the point to
get into, like, the immigration conversation of all
this as it relates to the larger picture
we're about to get into in foreign policy.
As Elon Musk says in relation to that
issue, you know, this long this week long
screaming hype about gay pedophile gang networks and
but only about Islam.
That's the whole point, which then turns into
Islam bad no matter what. All people in
this area are dangerous. That's it's it's all
become that very transparently despite him,
Elon,
right before this kind of shouting down Republicans
as racist.
It's just very interesting.
The point though is that obviously, there is
something going on there we should highlight. But
to then broad stroke an entire ideology, it's
just it is the epitome of ignorance. But
I don't think he's just stupid. I think
it's an agenda for Israel and a couple
of other things going on. But he simply
says, if protecting children makes one a fascist,
then so be it.
I mean, do you really think he's protecting
children? I mean, I maybe you could argue
that that awareness might have some effect in
that regard. Good.
But this person just saying, shut up, Elon.
We don't want your fascism in Europe. Like,
you really think that's just about your focus
on UK and and gang rapes?
It's just it's it this is the same
of as him pretending that,
Nick Fuentes was claiming he was being censored.
He's he knows what he's doing. He knows
that he gets 44,000,000
views, and no matter what the other narrative
is, it gets overshadowed.
So the point is, the guy's simply going
your fascism in Europe in all of the
conversations, your efforts to overthrow the government in
the UK in general, your efforts to make
something happen in Germany, your or or Venezuela
or anywhere else we're dealing with this. What
you're doing is pretty stupid and ridiculous, but
that's my opinion. You can think for yourself.
But the general point is we don't want
your interference.
But then he goes, pedophiles and you're crazy
because he knows that's gonna get the reaction
of the mindless right. Not the not the
majority, not the conservatives, but the people that
are all just whatever will go along with
what you say because this is fun, because
trolling, because teams were politics.
And Daniel McAdams nails it by saying, wait
till he hears what's happening in Gaza,
obviously. You think he doesn't know about all
the children being raped and tortured and starved.
But clearly, he doesn't just care about protecting
children. He cares about using the story about
protecting children to manipulate you. Because if you
cared about children, well, what about all the
other examples? But, you know, same point we
made.
No. No. We don't get to decide which
ones he says cares cares about, but the
overarching point is, clearly,
if you're protecting children
and supporting an agenda that's currently starving and
killing children, that doesn't seem to make sense.
That's pretty obvious.
Now in regard to the other example of
the partisan manipulation, this is all happening in
real time right now. This weird kind of,
what's the right word for it? Disjointed?
It's it's the idea that we're making all
these the Greenland, the the Panama cover the
the Gulf of Mexico, and the money to
the Taliban. All these stories, he's just kind
of ratcheting. I think it's clear that it's
about just
what's the word? Like, mudding the waters, but
get just dumping so much into the conversation
that what really matters gets missed.
But you can decide for yourself. Let's just
cut cut to the meat of each one
of these examples, and you can decide.
So Laura Logan says, imagine giving these terrorists
$40,000,000 of your tax money. This is, the
Taliban,
the US congress, January 2nd,
discussing money going to the Taliban.
Which if if anybody
has if if you've been watching this show,
if you're even remotely politically aware longer than
just October 7th forward or whatever or Trump's
last administration,
the idea is or after that, I would
say. The idea is that this is so
shockingly not partisan.
This is what I mean by partisan misrepresentation.
So she she it's crazy. The fact that
we're spending money to the group and have
been the entire time to the group that
they claimed we were fighting to overthrow Even
though that was never really the case because
they had worked with these same elements for
a very long time.
But the point is, Elon says, are we
really sending taxpayer money to the Taliban?
Same kind of thing. As this law this
lofty question. Are you guys really this uninformed
in politics while pretending to be in troll
of politics?
You know how long this conversation's been public?
No. It's not about him going, I can't
believe it. It's about doing that to everybody
watching him. To get you guys to go,
what?
Oh, lurch into there and go, woah, the
democrats. That's all he wants from you.
And if he doesn't know this, it's embarrassing
because this has been a very long term
20 year war this week this has been
a long conversation. My only point
is here, just quickly showing, this is from
2019,
what did the US get for $2,000,000,000,000
in Afghanistan?
Okay? And you could read it. It's the
Taliban controls much of the country. They're only
stronger now because of same point. You think
that money did not go to help them
get stronger?
The Taliban are gaining strength? Or this one
that says the GOP
quietly removed a webpage hailing Trump's peace deal
with the Taliban as the militant group seized
power. Okay. So lots of funding dumping into
the country, Trump making deals. Okay. But we're
gonna pretend that all of this is just
about democrats and funding the Taliban. Right? That's
what he wants from you. He wants you
not to think about these things. Or he
may just be that uninformed. Maybe you shouldn't
listen to him.
Think about that.
As I said, to make it a partisan
thing is all about your current agenda. It's
just the government.
All of it.
You are either deliberately dishonest or dangerously uninformed,
possibly both.
And here, you can all include the articles.
You can read them for yourselves. This article
is from,
2021.
Right? So it's just very clear what's going
on here.
And then this is from today or yesterday,
excuse me. And so it just shows you
how this continues to go. The US inadvertently
funding the Taliban, Republicans say. So all of
a sudden, now it's a conversation. You know
why? Because Elon tweeted about it. That's how
this works. And all of a sudden, Tim
Burchup sees an interest in trying to get
some attention, and he goes, we are. The
next terrorist attack will be a 100% funded
by
the American taxpayer.
Guys, they've been supporting this group
forever.
Like, it I mean, it's just so blatantly
dishonest for them to pretend like, look, again,
they know that the person that this is
manipulating is somebody who just heard about this
for the first time.
That's opportunism.
It's not partisan. It's just your government. And
on an interesting note to show you the
other side of this or kind of this
more, the ideas that remember the the person
Elon Musk was just freaking out about getting
in power in Venezuela? Remember that?
The guy the the the,
what's his name again? It's, Edmar
Edmundo Gonzalez?
Right? Meske was just going to town about
who he really won. He should be in
power. He's gonna save Venezuela. Right? Same thing
you're doing with Germany and all these other
conversations. Well, take a look at this guy.
Here's Max Blumenthal saying, here's Ed Edmundo Gonzales,
the US recognized president of Venezuela. Funny how
we went from Guaido to another fake president.
He goes, it is Washington
it is
wait. Excuse me. Oh, he is in Washington
to swap dementia stories with Joe Biden. He
literally says it's weekend at Bernie's and Espanol.
Look at this guy. This is the guy
they wanted to be in power.
That's the guy.
He comes shuffling out being held by 2
people barely that is an elderly man who
needs attention
or at least needs help to walk out
of the room.
I mean, really, guys?
Just think about how ridiculous that is. Just
think about how stupid it is for them
to scream about how Biden is senile, which
he is, but then fight to put this
person in power. It's all about puppets, guys.
That's all this really is. They just want
their puppet. And don't forget,
he
literally
is the the support to Israel is transparent.
The woman that he works with wrote a
letter to Israel in 2018
asking them to regime change Venezuela.
I covered this on the
show. And that's who they want. I'm sure
you could connect the dots why.
As well as all the lithium and inform
and what they want from Venezuela. Right? As
Elon famously said, we'll cool whoever we want.
Now, Patrick says, people need to understand that
Elon Musk, pretending to be conservative,
is doing the same thing as George Soros,
pretending to be a liberal. 2 billionaires with
more money than sense, who are really interested
in pumping up their global egos and manipulating
markets to secure their warped vision of the
future. Completely agree. And I just thought this
was funny.
You guys are Lord of the Rings fans.
Here's Elon is what is it? The creamer
worm tongue speaking into the what is it?
The
king of Rohan?
If you remember the scene, it's just funny.
Because I mean, I don't know how you
see this, but because right now, there's a
lot of talk about how Elon's taking control
of MAGA. And, I mean, I don't know
if it's all hype and partisan back and
forth or not, but it's interesting
that it is there's a lot more influence
swinging towards Elon right now, and I just
wonder how much that frustrates Trump. We know
these people are nothing if not egotistical.
Now Sam Tripoli made a point about the
Sean Ryan review, which I thought was important
as we get into the Greenland conversation.
Because, I mean, in you can see how
these kind of evolve. Right? The obviously, this
one became the basis for the conversation of
the ISIS invasion, the jihad attack, like Charlie
Kirk was saying, which is Islam bad. They're
invading our country. Even though it very quickly
got shown to be something else, but they
didn't stop the narrative. But Sam says this.
I'm sorry that so much criticism has been
directed at Sean Ryan, especially when he mentioned
going into hiding, which he recently did, but
now appears to have found time to engage
with comments.
Oops. It says that aside, we can't ignore
history. When intelligence propaganda is presented
as whistleblower information,
particularly when it aligns it conveniently with the
military industrial complex push for war, it's crucial
to approach it with skepticism.
Well said, Sam.
Exactly. Now here's what Sean said on 7th.
But, you know, he apparently wasn't hiding and
then just didn't decide to be that anymore.
He said, over the past few days, something
has become very apparent to me. Everyone wants
everyone claims to want truth, transparency, and disclosure,
unless they aren't part of it. I get
it. Right? So you're mad that everyone didn't
blindly accept your narrative, and so they're not
so all what you do is you make
it about pettiness.
They just weren't the ones, and so they
didn't wanted to. Well, I'm sure that exists
somewhere.
But as everybody down below is talking about
and anybody with a brain is highlighting, your
narrative is false. That's what it's not about
you having the
your
narrative is false. That's what it's not about
you having the story and everybody else, guys.
It's just simply an easily digestible story that
is shown to be completely
all of them. I mean, I said what
I mean is this one and the one
after, which we'll show you in a second.
That's not to say that Sean Ryan knew
that. I don't know. Maybe he just I
mean, look. Let's be clear. Obviously, it's pretty
easy to see where this became very suspect.
And at the very least, as he said
when he started, we can't prove any of
this, then why did you do it?
Then, nonetheless, the point is maybe he just
doesn't care about due diligence. Maybe or he
got tricked. Maybe he didn't know. I don't
know. I'm not saying he's guilty. What I
do know is that what has quickly happened
after this has shown that this is something
that nobody bought, The information rapidly fell apart.
And now he's saying you just weren't part
of it and that's why, which seems wildly
suspect to me. It says, and if they
are not part of it, they will stop
at nothing to try and destroy everything you've
ever done. No matter how much good or
how much truth, their ego will consume their
entire mind and eventually their entire existence. Humanity
is in a sense,
wow.
Little bit hubristic, if you want my opinion.
Like, that's a wild overreach to people that
just are angry that you got the break
story. Like, that's the way he's framing it.
You can decide for yourself. I think it's
pretty clear that this story is straight up
CIA propaganda,
which, by the way, was in my immediate
gut instinct. And then when you actually go
through it, it becomes pretty hard to see.
And I'll and and again, this is well
before I even looked at anybody else's opinion.
You always should know that about me. I
I don't care who is talking about something.
I will wanna find out what I think
about it independent of anybody. That that's important.
That's what we should all be doing. But
then at the same time, after that research
process, it does matter to me what people
I respect might think about it. But that
will not change what I think about something
if my conclusion has been come to unless
there's more evidence around it. But my point
is that a lot of other people that
I think are very intelligent about this were
very
just not swayed by it.
And this is the next one that came
out, which we all saw, where they came
out and said, basically, that if you challenge
911 narratives, then you're helping terrorists. I mean,
that's just that is a hard sell for
most intelligent people. And she says, apparently, questioning
911, Whitney says this,
bothers the terrorists at the CIA because it
inhibits their ability to sell you narratives that
utilize the same boogeyman they created over and
over. I mean, look. If you understand this
is why it's so obvious. If you understand
that Al Qaeda and ISIS are US Israeli
proxies, which is not an opinion, that's a
verifiable fact, Then this doesn't then you already
know this is false, guys. And that's that's
the point. This they're just trying to tap
into old narratives that have already fallen apart.
And maybe Ryan doesn't know that. It says
no 911 truther backs Al Qaeda or views
them as rebels.
The overwhelming view in 911 truth is that
Al Qaeda is a proxy for the intelligence
services of the US. But that's what they're
trying to basically allude to is that we
we think they're the good guy and no.
We don't, guys. It's the ideas that it's
just not the main culprit. You're just using
them like you do anybody else. And it
says, you can't blame 911 truth when the
actual people, quote, backing Al Qaeda are the
consecutive
US presidential administrations that back Al Qaeda in
Syria for now successful regime change purposes.
Michael Krieger chimes in as well with the
same point and says the CIA realized podcasts
are how you influence the masses and then
started their own shows under the guise of
speaking truth. And a whole bunch of you
are gullible enough to gobble it up. Truly
remarkable level of stupidity. This isn't even clever
or hidden. It's totally in your face. And
that's that's how I see it too. And
that's what's funny is like so we can
recognize it like the corporate media. Right? Well,
it's just a medium, guys. You know how
long ago they recognized that this was the
new field? That's why they were trying to
stop everybody from getting into it because they
wanted to dominate the market. Remember, it went
from, like,
conspiracy theorists in their mother's basement to, like,
this is the new field, like, on a
dime because they recognized it a long time
ago.
Just realize that this is what
look, come let me put it like this.
Look at the information.
Try to vet it for yourself. If you
can't,
and they say themselves they can't verify it,
and you look back at the information we
provided and it breaks down the idea that
you can prove these people are it should
be clear to you. Do your due diligence.
You'll recognize this is very obvious.
Now we we see what we see is
this weird conversation kinda spinning up. Now I'm
not sure whether I think this is about
trying to distract
or if this is just the transparent, which
I it's I actually am leaning this direction.
Out the the transparent,
initiation of one arm of what has always
been planned.
And what was wild to me I guess
it makes sense with how many other things
we're seeing,
like the
you know, basically, art the idea of the
digital ID or the idea of the biometric
scans or or, you know, any of these
things that they're now normalizing as or like
Elon Musk and, like, the entire great reset.
How they're just literally packaging it as
not the same thing because Elon's doing it.
It's like literally every example, but Elon's doing
it, so it's good. Right? So it is
the same plan.
So in this case, the same thing. Why
not just roll out the North American Union
and be like, we're freeing everybody.
I mean, that seems to be what they're
doing. But I guess my point is we
should very at least be cautious about whether
this is sort of a, you know like,
right now one of the games around this
all is that it's sort of a big
troll. That you're all being tricked.
The point is I always consider that. No
matter how I'm engaging with it, always in
my mind is maybe they're just doing this
to get attention. You know, we always cover
this. But that's typically the response you get
from people that, like, kinda don't want this
to be real or to feel like it's
high making Trump look bad, whatever.
Oh, you're all being trolled. You're you're too
leaning in too far to the kfab or
whatever the fake wrestling.
It's just yeah. Maybe you're maybe right. Doesn't
change the fact that what's going on right
here is so shockingly irresponsible and has real
world consequences,
whether or not you think he's play. And
even if he's just trolling, think about how
ridiculous that would be to do this. You
don't think that Canada could respond in ways
that might change your relationship or cause some
kind of military action or Greenland or the
UK or Mexico?
Oops. Just kidding. April fools. Too late. Right?
I mean, it just seems so sad that
people can even pretend that makes sense. And
even if you think that's what's going on,
wouldn't you be insulted by that? Wouldn't you
call them out for be no. Because it's
all part of the game. It's all for
the lols. Right? We're all just trolling, and
it's all
it's sad, guys. It's sad. It's juvenile and
it's sad. And the reality is these are
not games they're playing. But here is Trump
saying
well, in this clip, he's talking about the
Gulf of Mexico. But overall, we've all seen,
make Canada the 51st state. I'll show you
the tweets.
Take over Greenland from Denmark.
Liberate the UK from its tyrannical to controlled
government, which I would agree with, but why
they would be calling so liberate them into
another controlled government. That's it doesn't make any
sense. Change Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf
of America. And they just concerned citizens says
2025 is gonna be wild.
It's just so embarrassing.
So,
now, you could argue these are all games,
but let's be clear that they're not presenting
it that way even remotely.
Now we're talking about the Twitterverse conversation. We're
talking about things like this,
where Trump, at least on true social, says
many people in Canada love being the 51st
state. The United States can no longer suffer
the massive trade of there's not any even
indications as sort of just a game. Or
we're just using this to coerce them into
a better deal, which is what people think.
Maybe that's the case, but it's still a
very dangerous thing they're doing.
Trump renews calls for Canada to merge with
the United States. This is not new. More
than once, he's reiterated this. So at this
point, it's well beyond some kind of troll.
Let's be clear about that because of the
way they're engaging with it.
So Douglas McGregor highlights the same thing and
shows you something important. Before we even get
into the overlap for what this really is,
look at the
North Pole view.
Okay? So look to the point is, what
he's saying is that for going after Greenland
is not only strategic for military purposes, but
also for resources, which is huge for what
they're doing. The whole artificial intelligence, digital
control structure future.
But he says this brings America into direct
confrontation with Russia,
fighting over control of the Arctic Sea routes
due to melting ice in the northwest passage
that connects the Pacific to the Atlantic Oceans.
A treaty designed to provide for unobstructed passage
by all parties would be better than war.
But look at that, guys.
That causes quite an interesting development, doesn't it?
Here, as we show show the other day,
is John Junior and even Charlie Kirk, all
of a sudden Greenland. So kind of a
far a lot a pretty far reaching effort
to go to a for trolling. Right?
The sun's president,
a leading element in the manipulative partisan field,
flying to Greenland, and it says, incredible day.
Just
clearly, they're putting a hell of a lot
of effort to, at very least, get you
to think this is something.
Which don't you or if if they're all
get tricking you, don't you feel insulted by
that?
Because it's not just Democrats. Right? Because the
reality is there's been a 1000000 examples of
this where they go, we are being trolled,
and then it turns out to be real.
So, no. You got trolled in the reverse.
But clearly, this is pretty weird.
And, and Brendon Serkises points out another conflict
of interest, by the way. Panama was one
of the other ones floated about the Panama
Canal and taking it back and all these
things have come up. But he goes, what
does he want from Panama? Trump. He says
it could be related to a $10,000,000
campaign contribution from a company called Energy Transfer
LP.
They signed a memorandum of understanding with Panama
on exploring LPG export project in Panama. Well,
look at that.
Guys, if you don't think these things play
a factor on this and that's possibly another
reason why he has yet to sign these
conflicts of interest and ethics pledges,
Every one of these politicians do this stuff.
Just realize it's not unique to Trump, but
it matters.
That this may be guiding why these things
are happening that very very genuinely could lead
to conflict.
Let's be clear, guys. Greenland and the the
government has become
each time been like, f no.
Absolutely no matter what, not even on the
table. That's what they're responding. And yet they're
the whole momentum of this is just getting
out of control. But here is Doge News,
of course, who's just being, like, a propaganda
arm for the US government at this point
and says, do you support making Greenland part
of the United States?
What did what did the question even mean?
Support what? So we're gonna annex them? Do
they want that? Do the people want that?
Does the government want that? What does that
mean for their the laws? What does it
mean for the people of Greenland? What does
that mean for their their social programs that
we it's it's such a crazy thing to
even because the point is it's all about
political agendas.
I simply said, these aren't trading cards, you
infants.
The casual way you discuss such naked imperialism
is just irresponsible.
It's the very globalism you pretend to be
fighting.
I said, it's it's not just irresponsible. It's
the very globalism you pretend to be fighting.
Because realize, guys, we're gonna get into this
point. It's not the imperialistic overlap, which is
just
colonial. It's just it's conquering territory.
For whatever logical reason, whatever you wanna say,
there's always a narrative around these things.
But that that is one step in the
same conversation. Now we're we'll get into this
very clearly.
Now, Bennet Johnson puts this out. Now he
seems to be the one really playing this
sort of we're trolling, but we're not game
all the time. And I'll show you about
the Gulf of Mexico one, where clearly, as
much as Trump just with stone dead straight
face said that's what's gonna happen in front
of a press conference, just be pretty stupid
for that to be a joke.
Makes this clip about to makes this clip
about how, like, I'll show it to you.
With like barnyard music, and they look beautiful.
Like, almost very clearly trying to insinuate that
it's all a joke, but not really saying
that. I'm telling you, there's a tactic to
this.
But he tweets out, welcome to the Gulf
of America. Because That's what he said. He's
gonna change the Gulf of Mexico to the
Gulf of America. And he shows a picture
with literally the North American Union, which if
you don't remember, is a new world order
agenda that's been around for a very long
time and used to be called out by
almost exclusively Republicans until suddenly Trump and Elon
made a thing, and now we forget it
all, apparently.
And I said, so now Republicans are apparently
fully endorsing globalism, which
clearly stirred the bee's nest because people lost
their minds. And if you read through this
chat,
you get, like, the same three responses. Like,
that's or you have variations of it. That's
imperialism, not globalism. It's like, okay. Well, they're
the intersection between the two is transparently obvious.
Or it's Americanism, not globalism. And it's like,
okay. What do you mean if you're insulting
them or not? I can't even tell. Or,
you know, the argument being that this is,
you know, saving Greenland and Canada from the
bad guys. And it's just like it's just
most of it ends up being in the
realm of I support these people and I
blindly believe what they tell me they wanna
accomplish.
It's just sad.
But we'll come back to this more. The
point is clearly this part first. The North
American Union, that's exactly what that is. That
has been a long term globalist UN agenda
for a while.
Isn't this what, I mean, Alex Jones and
the rep? I mean, weren't they just telling
us globalism, globalism, and now they don't wanna
highlight that?
Here's drunk news anchors as globalist right now.
And it shows the guy from, what's it
called?
What's that called?
I can't believe I'm like, I never really
watched it, but I know the name of
it.
You know, the marketing salesman, whatever, it doesn't
matter. You give me the chat what that
show is called. But it says, globalist right
now, and it shows him, like, pitching at
a table. And it goes, the North American
Union,
but we repackage it as MAGA.
It's just so perfect. And it's just that
simple and lazy, it seems to me. But
okay. Let's just talk what is globalism?
And a basic, like, brave engine,
definition.
Mad Men. Thank you. Mad Men is the
show.
It says there's 2 variations. A national geopolitical
policy
in which the entire world is regarded as
the appropriate sphere of a state's influence. By
that definition alone, that's the United States government
or Israel for that matter or the UK.
Right? That's how they view it. Like, they
view it as their influence supersedes damn near
everything. But you can make the same argument
about China or Russia. I mean, there's the
same elements there. Right? So that's when it
becomes the the point of whether they're truly
aiming at forcing
that influence
or their policy or their outcomes or even
occupation
around the world. Because you realize there's not
just one basic way. Like, I think that's
one of the problems with this conversation is
they've got these, like, very partisan
republican stated definitions of what meets what globalism
is. Well, that's it's a it's a nebulous
concept, guys. If there's books written about it,
nobody has a it's it's a big picture.
And the bottom line is we're talking about
a one world government concept. That's the simplest
way people will think about it. But it
doesn't even have to be one conquered area,
which I know that's what people are pushing
back on in the argument of taking Greenland.
But it's the same general idea. Whether through
conquest or political control, if you've got one
entity that controls everything, that's the same conversation.
Just because you wanna believe that they're gonna
do it for a good reason or we're
gonna give them the constitution, it's the same
effing thing. And, frankly, I think you're childish
for thinking that's what they're gonna do. They
don't respect the constitution here, guys, neither does
Trump. Take the guns. Due process later. Right?
Burn the flag. Go to the go to
jail. It's the same stupid stuff. Just because
you agree with what he uses doesn't mean
it's not still unconstitutional.
So the bottom line is a national geopolitical
geopolitical policy in which the entire world is
regarded as appropriate sphere of their influence.
How do you not see this as an
extension of that? Or at my point and
the other one was, they go, isn't globalism
the globe?
Like, so it's instantaneous? Is that your mindset?
That you snap your fingers and suddenly they
control everything?
Or maybe maybe it's incremental. Maybe they go
one step at a time. Maybe I'm crazy
though. It's like, I don't think they thought
that through. So the point is if they
were gonna go global, well, they need to
take steps to get there. And maybe Canada's
you know, or the EU. Right?
Anybody paying attention already knows this stuff. It's
the slow expansion of the same thing.
Number 2,
the development of social, cultural, technological,
or economic networks
that transcend national boundaries.
That, guys, is far more important to the
point today. That is what they wanna make
out to be Democrats from, like, the Dallas
Jones world, but it is very clearly just
the US government. And right now, it seems
to be, prominently
through Trump's administration.
And what did Kirk just say? I told
you in the early beginning.
Get rid of the ones that don't believe
in our social now what they want to
make that out to be is the opposite,
that we're boxing everybody out. But we just
you can't pretend one's not I mean, right
now, you could pretend that's the case, but
then they're going, let's take Greenland. Let's take
this. Right? So you're not boxing them out
if you're expanding your territory. So the point
is if you're expanding your territory and you're
saying you're not welcome here if you don't
claim these same ideological cultural things,
well, then that that's globalism. Because the place
you just expanded to is now forced to
adopt your this is not that hard.
And that's what a lot of the Republican
mindset is doing. Not all conservatives, but the
the clearly and high level part of the
Republican agenda here. Technological?
Guys, that's technocracy. It is straight up happening
in front of you, and they are pushing
this control around the world. Look. Go back
to Elon Musk's spy satellite network. You can't
miss what we're seeing right now. And it
takes a special kind of willful ignorance to
not acknowledge that this is so obviously that
agenda.
Economic networks, are we not are we missing
the economic sanctions that have been applied around
the world because they have that financial power?
This is globalism. And, well, Israel is a
leading part in this agenda with the United
States.
Now turn around and ask yourself why people
make these grandiose claims of globalism, but failed
to highlight very clearly the Republican side or
Israel.
Now when it's happening in full display, they're
looking at some look in the UK and
Elon Musk, and they're not paying attention to
it.
So keeping this in mind,
let's talk about the idea of globalism.
Or really just first and foremost, the idea
of the globalist agenda, which includes the North
American Union.
Just an image. I'll show you who shared
it with me. A 1942
map of the new world order.
It says the map on the bedroom wall
of every teenage Bilderburger. Like, you know, the
Bilderberg,
you know, meeting.
Which Derrick Brose and plenty of others called
out. Even Alex Jones used to break break
in and report. And weirdly, this doesn't matter
right now.
But you can see clearly the North American
Union aspect of it. Now, this map is
the post war new world map,
2010.
This comes from the club of Rome, which
you should all be familiar with. You know,
the main one of the main points being
that they had I argued that the, you
know, the human is the problem. Right? Ultimately,
that you are the problem. But this comes
from as it says, the group was organized
in 1968
for the purpose of accelerating plans to have
the new world order in place by the
year 2000.
76, the United States Associations Club Rome was
formed for the purpose of shutting down the
US economic gradually US economy gradually.
And here we are. No slight deviations, but
the same general point. Right?
Blocks of control.
That's what has always been the plan, and
conservatives
used to call this out.
Now this is Meg, Kelly McCarthy's one that
shared this other 2 as well. But also
showing you, this should be the big silencer
right now of the republicans who were still
very much and rightly so on guard against
the UN sustainable development goals, the great recent
because they make this all about a democrat
woke agenda. Right? We'll take a look at
the same thing.
Regional groupings.
They want this to be one North American
Union.
It's the same thing that we're dealing with
right now.
And this is
Elon Musk says, if the people of Greenland
want to be part of America, which is
best I can tell, they do not.
Now, I don't know how you really tell
based on, you know, the government says they
don't. Based on what I can see online,
most responses I'm seeing are, like, laughing about
this and don't want that, don't feel that
their culture is mad, a whole bunch of
things.
But you can look for yourself. Do your
own due diligence.
But it says,
if they want to be, which as if
it's you're gonna make it a choice. Right?
You guys are clearly driving this politically. It
says, which I hope they do, they would
be most welcome.
See, that's making this out to be some
kind of a then then what happens is
you get the Republican conversation acting like he's
just offering them freedom.
Just this shocking amount of naivety.
But that's what he says, and here's what
what he says. People should consider
that arguably the main interest in Greenland,
all and also likely Canada as well. Oh,
actually, hold on. I forgot I was gonna
come back to this.
My point here was
this,
and we'll come back to that in a
second. It's just this is gonna get into
the other points of what are important in
Greenland. But I I wanted to make sure
we focus on the first part of this,
the background.
Her point is obviously what we're talking about,
the idea of resources and other examples that
that bolster the transhumanist
AI
great reset agenda. Right? But again, so the
point first is this, the regional groupings of
the 2019 sustainable development goals report.
Now, here's Whitney highlighting the Shark Tank guy,
I mean, naming it,
openly saying he spoke to Trump about creating
a North American Union. So what's funny to
me is these are people out there acting
like this is so fake, and we're making
this up, and it's not globalism. And then
literally, I spoke to Trump and he's all
about it.
It is a part of this. And the
next segment we're gonna go in lays it
out. Like the overt reality that the North
American Union is part of what the Republicans
more than ever have been calling the, I
mean, it is, but what you they used
to highlight as the new world order.
I'll show people right now who are ignoring
it that were all about it a few
years ago. Whitney says, here comes that smaller
government, guys. Worked great for the EU, didn't
it? How exactly is it smaller government to
absorb to other countries?
You might wanna think about that because you
realize that means a hell of a lot
more of exactly what they're high what they're
saying we wanna get rid of.
But don't think too hard into it.
President-elect Trump on this issue.
I had 2 topics that I wanted to
talk to him about. Number 1 was integrating
Canada towards a North American Union,
for greater strength, just period. The world's a
a difficult place these days, and most Canadians
would look to look would like to look
at that opportunity without giving up their sovereignty.
So low hanging fruit would be combined currency,
for example.
Can I just say that I I am
insulted? You know, like, the the way they
refer to that. Like, giving up your sovereignties.
You know? Don't worry. You've got your sovereignty
badge. You're good.
Like, the point is they don't they doesn't
even mean what you think it means to
them. It's a it's a it's a label.
It's an idea. The reality being is sovereignty
is not something they should be able to
just rip away from you because they decide.
You know? It's just funny to me that's
that, you know, it's like, we've given your
freedoms. You got your freedoms. You know? It's
it's it is a it is a token
based on some illusion that they give you.
Like, this is not something that should be
so casually discussed.
Binding the Bank of Canada. Most Canadians would
look to look would like to look at
that opportunity without giving up their sovereignty. So
low hanging fruit would be combined currency, for
example, combining the Bank of Canada with the
Fed, things like that. We are the largest
Sure. Partners.
And just to ask him,
because this was on Saturday,
to say these meetings you're having with Trudeau
and finance ministers from Canada,
with all due respect, sir, are a complete
waste of time. This guy is gonna get
eradicated
out of the Canadian political landscape.
Give the Canadians
the chance to reelect a leader just like
you got reelected that has a 4 year
mandate just like you have, and let's get
down to business. And I I hope they
didn't land on deaf ears. I I think
he saw the
the rationale in that. That was one topic.
But I had another agenda item that was
very important. President-elect Trump. I had 2 topics
that I wanted to talk to him about.
Number 1 was integrating Canada towards a North
American Union.
Very clear.
Remember, sure worked out great for the EU,
didn't it? Ask Republicans. They'll talk all day
about how the EU is the pro that's
the problem. But let's make the North American
Union.
You just can't stop pointing out the embarrassing
hypocrisy right now of the team sport politics
right.
Now here just becomes even more obvious.
I simply said,
only so many times you can deflect before
you admit that this is exact. Damn it.
Exact. Exactly what you thought you were fighting.
Globalism.
Maybe spell it too? No. Okay.
So here, Daniel Hanon says Trump saying,
he has plans to use economic force to
make Canada a state.
I mean, guys, you just can't get more
ridiculous. This is exactly like, if you still
think this is a troll,
even if it is just a troll, whatever
that means at this point, and you're threatening
economic action to force Canada in the United
States, you're well past the idea of a
troll. Well, even if it started that way,
too late. It's already become real to people
who don't know whether it's real or not,
might think you're beginning an economic war against
them, which, by the way, is the foundation
for every real war we've ever seen in
the context of at least the the, you
know, living memory, the current reality of the
world.
So let's let's listen to this.
This is Donald Trump
discussing
forcing Canada. Mister
president, if you were working under the assumption
that you're serious about making Canada 51st state
of the United States,
the leader of the conservative party in Canada
said, under no circumstance, he will ever be
the 51st state. Maybe he won't win, but
maybe he will. I don't point. You would
suggest Listen. I don't see any Sir, real
fast. You're considering
military force to acquire Panama
and Greenland. Are
Military force. I mean, you don't that's not
something you troll about. You're openly threatening military
force
to take foreign territory. Totally not imperialism or
globalism. Right? Because, again, the 2 intersect. Right?
Imperialism
will lead to globalism in the context of
conquest or on the other side of it,
the cultural, technological, and all the rest of
it, guys. It's all happening in front of
you. Are you also considering a military force
to annex and acquire? No. Economic force.
Because Canada and So just the military force
for the other ones. Greenland, Panama, you know,
but Canada, economic warfare, which is economic terrorism.
I mean, that's not my opinion.
He's talking about sanctions. He's talking about economic
manipulation,
tariffs, and so on. Like, this is the
foundation of every war we've talked about.
It's important to understand history. The United States,
that would really be something.
You get rid of that artificially drawn line,
and you take a look at what that
looks like, and it would also be much
better for national security. Don't forget, we basically
protect Canada.
But here's the problem with Canada.
So many friends up there.
I love the Canadian people. They're great.
But we're spending 100 of 1,000,000,000 a year
to protect it. So here's the other thing
to think about, guys.
Obviously, what I'm telling you is that this
appears to be the long term agenda just
coming to fruition.
So if you're willing to consider that, you
also should be willing to consider that this
is all theater. That ultimately, whoever's in power,
whoever's been put in power in the UK,
whoever's in power in whatever other entities we're
talking about. I mean, save for the possibility
that the leadership in Greenland is not part
of the agenda, which is certainly possible. I
mean, again, I'm very jaded when it comes
to government in general. I find it hard
to believe that would happen with all the
exert the power they could exert, the things
they could do. We're we're gonna see it
happen in real time now. My point though
is that we should consider that it's all
theater. This, we're not gonna do it and
Greenland will never allow it. When the point
is all of them are already aware that
that's the plan to create this global I
mean, think about that. That could I could
be wrong.
But you have to realize that clearly would
make sense with how long this has been
sought. And now they're kind of rolling it
out with a very flimsy narrative to say,
it's totally not exactly what it looks like
because we're battling each other. Well, it's worth
considering.
So here, just to reiterate, he's openly telling
you military force on Greenland, Panama, should they
decide, which totally will not cascade into some
massive problem, even if it's trolling. Right?
But on top of that, that Canada will
be an economic warfare.
I just don't so how do you think
this is gonna play out well when you're
basically poking Mexico, Canada, UK, all going out
this is
either meant to be a facade that leads
to the outcome
Or this is meant to be chaos,
which to me would be Israel or somebody
else trying to literally sow chaos and division
for their interests.
But as Daniel says,
how about we bring together the 5 great
anglosphere democracies
in a diplomatic,
military, and economic union?
Including unhindered free trade, pre movement, instantly, you
know, whatever. All the rest of that could
be maybe or maybe not. But let's bring
it together in a union otherwise known as,
I don't know, the let's see, you know,
North American Union. What do you think?
Totally random. Right? Elon Musk says, good idea.
Wow. Patrick Hennington says, panicking. Is America that
weak that it needs to team up with
subpar tiny militaries and debt ridden economies? Sounds
like someone's smoking too much of the high
grade. Interesting take. The point is that, you
know, whether that really need them for some
reason. But just ask yourself, is this or
is this not Elon Musk openly endorsing
exactly what they claim they're fighting?
Here, before we get into the reactions and
comments and so on,
is a general breakdown of what the narrative
has been. Right? And this is a pretty
old video
of the general idea of the North American
Union, how it plays into the New World
Order. And then we're gonna go over some
other people that are seemingly right now ignoring
it, even though they were the earliest people,
and released some of the earlier ones going,
this is a problem. And you should ask
yourself why that is right now.
In 2005,
an arrangement between Canada, Mexico, and the United
States was made. This arrangement, unannounced to the
public, unregulated by Congress, merges the United States,
Mexico, and Canada into one
entity, erasing all borders.
It's called the North American Union. You might
wanna ask yourself why you've never heard of
this. In fact, there is only one mainstream
reporter who has actually heard of and has
had the courage to cover this issue.
President Bush signed a formal agreement that will
end the United States as we know it,
and he took the step without approval from
either the US Congress
or the people of the United States. This
isn't some trade agreement, it is a total
removal of sovereignty from these countries, which will
also result in a completely new currency called
the AMERO. The AMERO is the proposed new
currency for the North American community, which is
being, developed right now between Canada, the US,
and Mexico
to make a borderless community much like the
EU,
and, the dollar Canadian dollar, US dollar, and
the Mexican peso replaced by the AMRO. By
default of this agreement, the American constitution
will eventually be obsolete.
You would think that a situation like this
would be on the cover of every major
newspaper.
That is until you realize the people who
are behind this movement are the same people
behind the mainstream media, and you are not
told what you're not supposed to know.
The last thing the men behind the curtain
want is a conscious
informed public capable of critical thinking. They seek
to keep you in a distracted,
naive bubble,
and they are doing a damn good job
of it.
Interesting.
Right? Now ask yourself,
one of the main points right now that
I keep hearing in the rest like the
like I said, they they get the same
old, like, regurgitated talking points that are circulating
this conversation to do ignore the obvious. One
of them being that they're just gonna give
the constitution to everybody else. Don't you want
that for everybody?
Well, my first point is how in the
world do you think you know that as
just a possible outcome? And even if they
want to do that, maybe that's not how
it ends up. Or they're maybe lying to
you. That can't be possible. Right?
But ask yourself how that ends up being
reality. Like, let's just even say that's exactly
what happens. So they
eat through military force, take Greenland.
Totally about freedom and democracy. Right? Totally aligns
with your libertarian values. The idea being that
clearly,
then you go, well, now you have the
constitution. But is that what they want? Now
I know I know many Americans believe, as
myself, that it's something that is if you're
forced to live in a state, a state
of society, that that is something that will
be important.
But maybe they don't want that. Maybe they
have different values. Oh, there you go. Now
it becomes Kirk's point that you have to
have our values because now you're in our
country. And that is globalism
by the very definition of the word.
Here
is Alex Jones.
I said, Alex knows this. He used to
call it out. Now he supports it because
Elon. Maybe he always did. Question everything. Here's
a 2007 interview with Aaron Russo.
He warned Alex Jones that the plan of
the international bankers was to establish a North
American Union with a regional currency called the
Omero. Maybe now they shifted into some kind
of digital Bitcoin monster. Who knows? But eventually,
leading the world to one government with no
cash and all payments made with RFID implants.
Now that that was the way you made
sense of that with the technology at the
time. Right? We're well past that now. So
but the same general ideas you already see
playing out, cashless,
internal, nanotech, whatever else. That's it's the same
stuff, and still people act like this is
crazy even though they're literally telling you what's
going on. My point is this is Alex
Jones interviewing about this. You think he doesn't
know about this, or you think he wouldn't
recognize the same maps?
Here he is.
Elon Musk says, if people of Greenland wanna
be part of America, we will welcome you.
We just showed you.
Alex says, love it. 1776
worldwide.
I mean, this honestly, it's insulting.
Truly insulting about the idea of this founding
of the country. Dave DeCamp says, in 17/76,
from antiwar.com,
the US seceded from an empire.
It didn't join 1.
I mean, it's just a bastardization of everything
we think we believe in, what we're fighting
for. So now it becomes new the end
the North American Union is the or the
beginning of the NWO,
and we have to fight it to suddenly
freedom for the world.
Isn't that globalism? Like, so if you the
world
is liberated.
Is that another way of saying the world
is now under the control of the liberator?
And assuming we even are liberated. I mean,
come on, guys. This is just so transparent.
Here is a documentary with somebody you might
remember.
Right now,
well, oh, wait. This is somebody you might
remember. Calling this out.
The merger of the United States, Mexico, and
Canada into one super country. I hacked the
idea,
the inspiration to call it the Amero. The
Amero is the proposed new currency for the
North American community. That sounds an awful lot
like a North American Union to me.
Canadians are saying
no to the North American Union and yes
to Canada's
sovereignty.
I find it amusing when people put sovereignty
as in a kind of crystal jar and
say, well, this is the ultimate.
Canadians, Americans, and Mexicans will lose
their sovereignty.
The Europeans
have thrown sovereignty out the window.
Maybe national sovereignty is not such a good
thing. To understand what's happening, we should look
at what has occurred under the security and
prosperity partnership.
Bill, please.
Everybody. It was implemented in a matter that
closed it off to public scrutiny. And the
only people who were invited into the room
were the largest CEOs of the largest businesses
in the 3 countries. Yep. Now, just think
of it as Palantir
and SpaceX and all it's the same dynamic,
guys. With all but this time,
with those very people in the cabinet of
the current administration.
Our country is defined and shaped by corporations.
It's not gonna stop with the North American
Union. It's going to be
one further step along the road to one
world government.
So just to see that quote they're showing,
Paul Warburg, international banker, director of the CFR.
Council on Foreign Relations, which by the way,
in Tulsi Gabbard, and also plenty of others
overlapped, which people the same the same people
you might think. Don't talk about it anymore.
It says, we will have a world government
where whether you like it or not. The
only question is whether that government will be
achieved by conquest or consent.
Enter Donald Trump.
We need a world of shared global rules
founded on shared global values.
It is a big That's globalism.
That's the point. And that's what you keep
hearing from them right now in the leader
aspects of the republican side. Share about
the reality being is that's exactly what we
should you know, that's what cultures have, but
not when you're forcing that on everybody else,
which is the ultimate point. And now we're
gonna take Greenland by force. I mean, I
just don't know how anybody could pretend that's
not exactly the opposite of what you guys
think you're fighting for. Idea.
A new world order. New world order, one
world government. Yeah. One world government.
Yeah.
Right now,
there's a war on for your mind. We
are losing our nation before our very eyes.
People are slowly beginning to to wake up
in the fact that the 4th estate,
has simply
not done their job. The people were as
if the people will stand up against them
and not tolerate their power grab
for the whole world. All it takes for
enough people to step out of the system
to cause a crash.
It is just a conspiracy theory. Do it
pairs if they call you conspiracy theorists? This
is the truth.
You guys are my family. You guys are
my friends. You guys are my companions
in this inflow war.
I personally think it will come.
Well,
funny how long this has been going on.
Right?
Same dynamics, same, you know, it's a lot
of passion.
Here he is today.
More wars are fought over trade routes and
resources. I think there's a bigger meaning to
Trump trying to secure the Panama Canal and
Greenland, in my opinion.
Literally circles the same point.
That's it. This person says me too. It's
called the new world order. You can strut
you can look for your best effort. You
will not find that talking point. You will
not find the discussion of, oh my god.
This is what I've been calling out for
20 years. Nope. Nope.
Funny that is. Right? I wonder why.
Here's another clip. You might remember this guy
too. What about the American Union? I mean,
the CFR
writes white papers for their agenda.
They carry out Goldberg's orders. That's on record.
And there and even Lou Dobbs on CNN
saying American Union, end of Canada, end of
US, they are actually, through the trade deals,
already starting to bleed us. Well, I I
breezed through what in Canada we've referred to
as the Manley report. John Manley was a
previous, deputy prime minister,
and he sat on a council foreign relations
committee
with the Mexicans and Americans. And and it
started off by saying,
does it not make sense that that that
Canada and US should be 1, that we
should have a common currency? Does it not
just make enormous sense we should have a
common border? To ask the question is to
answer. Now that was right in the report.
I know they're just waiting for us to
look the other way so they can whisk
it through. The American Union is happening through
trade deals just like the euro back in
the fifties when they first set it up
was this economic community or this trade block.
Now it's the euro, and now they're taking
people's right to vote, taking their sovereignty, giving
it to these supranational
organizations.
Where's that guy?
Funny, I guess, Israel got involved. So so
we're talking about the death of Canada is
what's happening in there right now. The death
of your sovereignty is happening in there right
now. CNN has even reported that these individuals
have put out the policy reports through the
council on foreign relations that writes their scholarly
white papers to end the United States, to
end Canada, and to end Mexico.
Yeah. Canada and Mexico. That's the that's the
picture we're talking about.
Now, here's what somebody responded to Luke Radowsky,
could try and, like, using the Trump tactic.
Something's going on here. What do you think?
Right? Broadly putting it out there so you
can go wink, wink. He knows the what
we're talking no. That doesn't seem to be
the case. As this person says, shrink the
federal so that there's the classic meme of
Elmo with fruit on one side and cocaine
on the other. And the fruit says, shrink
the federal government. And the cocaine says, expand
the federal government to Greenland, Panama, and Canada.
And then it shows MAGA with his face
down on the cocaine. It's like that yep.
That's that's
clearly what's going on here, and people are
need to start calling it out.
Now Alex Jones says, Trump describes the dawn
of America's golden age that we are oh,
look at this. He's he's so funny. Apparently,
people are calling him out, and he's just
he's going after, like, has Alex Jones been
replaced by the guy wearing a mask?
That's I it's I this is ridiculous. I
just think it's funny that that that's what
it's just anyway, the point is the dawn
of America's golden age, we are about to
enter.
That's instead of going
the new world order, which that seems to
be his whole career so far, nope. We're
going freedom and success and liberty based on
the exact thing you were calling out your
whole career. And doctor Amira says dissolving North
American borders is anti globalist now.
I'm telling you guys, it this is wild.
The mask I mean, there are I've never
seen this many people on the conservative side
going like, Alex, you're you I mean, I'll
I'll show you some clip. I'll show you
some posts. Here's Greg Reese. Remember somebody who
just recently left Infowars
as people seem to be doing? Remember when
the club of Rome were the bad guys,
and he's showing you the same dynamic?
He gets it.
Sam Tripoli,
here's a And this is what's funny before
we get to other clips, or other other
tweets.
This is today. Alright. So we just showed
you the older versions. So go back decades.
Like, oh, the North American Union conversation and
the reality of what's gonna be New World
Order, and all the same people now cheering
it on almost or the lawns going bad,
bad, bad, bad. Okay. Because it is bad.
Sam Tripoli, showing you that he's consistent, continuing
to call it out since all the way
back then, sums up and says, this is
a cute way of trying to get you
to start to accept the idea of the
North American Union, the NAU.
This is a spoonful of sugar to help
the poison go down. If they do this,
they will throw out the constitution and take
away our first and second amendment. Now that's
the other side of it, by the way,
while saying whether you force on somebody else.
It could just be like they're saying in
the videos that that's no longer valid. Ask
the people in the EU how that works
out. Right? We know how this works, guys.
But the point is this is now being
floated as some brand new idea. Totally not
the North American Union, but this is the
kind of MAGA representation. Whether this is a
MAGA account or not, the point is this
is where this idea is being funneled through.
The Trump kind of infrastructure.
This this is the positive view. The United
States, Mexico, and Canada became one country. If
all 3 nations joined together to form a
single country, they could call it COME or
the United Nations of COME, and it would
instantly become the most powerful country in the
world. Economically, this union would dominate with a
GDP of over $28,000,000,000,000
making it the richest country on earth. The
US' $25,000,000,000,000
economy would lead, boosted by Canada's energy resources
and Mexico's manufacturing strength. Geographically, this supernation would
span 21,660,000
square kilometers, overtaking Russia as the largest country
and nearly doubling Europe's size. From Canada's icy
Arctic to Mexico's sunny beaches, it would feature
unmatched diversity. The population would soar to nearly
500,000,000
ranking as the 3rd most populous country behind
only India and China. And with a defense
budget of over 900,000,000,000
and 1,700,000
active troops, it would command the world's most
advanced and powerful military.
So would you want the US to form
come and reshape the world?
Obviously, aside from the joke made in there.
Right?
Rah rah, America. Yeah. We're powerful. Like, okay.
Fine. Maybe you love that side of it.
Maybe you're all about might makes right, and
we should be powerful and make the military
great. Okay. Fine. Maybe you love all of
that. Do not pretend for one second that
it's even remotely the same as the other
side of the conversation.
Smaller government and rebellion against the deep state
and free no no. Those are the you
are now
losing the plot.
Because what's interesting is that's the real agenda,
and many Republicans don't even hide that. But
you got you got intertwined with this libertarian
mindset where they well, it's really just the
co opting of that side. Just like every
other thing we've talked about, where suddenly they
just kind of feign. They
just barely lean into the idea that you
want to think they're libertarian or Peter Thiel
just calls himself a libertarian. We go, yay.
I don't get it. Because the reality is
that is nothing remotely
what the game is. What they pretend about
smaller government, about respecting borders. I mean, all
these things they pretend. It just goes, whatever
those things. We we say all these words
and then we do what we want anyway.
Well, guess what? That's exactly what Israel's doing.
Exactly what the UK is doing. They don't
care. They're gonna keep doing their thing and
unless you have the courage to call them
out like we showed in the beginning,
they're gonna keep doing it.
If you can't see by now this is
just a a flimsy effort to get you
to support what you think you're fighting,
I don't think you want to.
David Icke highlights one of the another all
of these are going around. This guy says,
why is Trump saying he'll make Canada part
of America? Right? Because you can't accept it
just that it has that it is what
he's saying. It can't be that he's just
doing that because that doesn't make sense with
what I believe he's fighting for. So let's
fill in the blank with something that makes
it add up to what we can pretend
he's doing. Right? It's the game of saying,
like, I used to have this with with
my brother in the past where
he support Trump, still does today. Again, funny
enough, we're basically doesn't even talk to me
anymore where we in the beginning first administration,
we almost lost a relationship. And then afterward,
he came around realizing he lied about the
shot and Trump was lying about certain things.
And then suddenly, we were on the same
page even though my narrative said my opinions
say the same.
And all of a sudden, he's calling all
these things out and now we get to
the next administration time frame and my opinions
are the same. And all of a sudden,
he hates me again. It's like, that is
very telling because that is about what hit
the of evolution of the partisan influence on
the way he sees things even though I've
been saying the same things the entire time.
He became more amenable to them when he
wasn't being propagandized so heavily. That's my opinion.
But the point is the narrative becomes like
with the Afghanistan and the and the largest
non nuclear bomb. When I called that out
and was like, wow. Did you see that?
That's alarming. And he well, there must be
a reason.
Oh, is that your answer? Oh, there must
be. There must be an explanation. Well, that
just means blind faith. That means I will
pretend that the narrative that makes it all
make sense because I can't believe what I'm
looking at.
That's just willful ignorance, guys. And so the
point is, why is he saying this? Well,
he told you why he's saying it. He
already outlined what the point was, but let's
make something up. And why will Elon saying
America will liberate the UK? The point is
it will,
I thought I wrote right there. What Elon
David Icke highlights that it's about saving you
from the globalist.
That's the narrative. They were gonna literally create
the globalist new world order dynamic in order
to save you from the globalist. Well, guess
what, guys? It's like everything else. It's the
good globalism.
Right? It's the good guy version of globalism.
So just blind yourself to the fact that
it's the same thing and go, yay. Elon's
doing it, so we're all gonna be okay.
David Icke says this guy is so unbelievably
diluted that Alex should get him on the
show immediately.
Trump wants Canada to to become part of
the US to save them from globalists. That's
his quote. Nothing to do with the so
long planned North American Union then on the
road to the world government?
Well, here's Alex today saying the great the
welcome to the great reset.
No, no, you'd be forgiven if you thought
he suddenly recognized the North American Union.
He's pointing to the wildfires because that's the
new distraction today. Now look, guys,
it's obviously a horrifying thing. And obviously people
are suffering, and you should not for one
second
dismiss the possibility that these things are being
engineered.
I'm not even getting into that today. And
I even tried to look for that because
I was focused on other things today. Tomorrow,
I'm sure I'll look into it.
Point though, as I've said many times,
events like this are horrifying. And sometimes there
are just things that happen. And sometimes there
are just crazy storms. And the point is
that at the end of the day, that's
not news. It's news insofar as you say,
here's what happened. Here's the fallout. It's sad
that people are suffering.
If suddenly you go, now we have evidence
that it was manipulated, yeah, that's huge. Or
here's evidence the government is not doing what
they're supposed to in the aftermath, yes, I
agree. That's news. But I get frustrated how
it becomes a partisan story every time there's
a storm now or every time something like
this happens. Or when it's important to go
look at the big crazy fire so you
don't focus on how we're supporting the North
American Union.
The fire's crazy. I'll be honest. I mean,
I'm worried for some people that I know
are close to it. And that I mean,
it it's a new story insofar that it
is a wild thing that's happening. But, again,
I'm not I if there's evidence to more
than that, send it to me. I will
talk about it in the next show. I
just wanna highlight the timing of this, which
I find very interesting of all people.
He says the great reset while ignoring literally
the great reset through Elon Musk, through Trump's
administration, through the grid the new world order
in front of him. But, no, it's the
fires because it's easy to point to that.
And I would agree to a broad point
that it could be the idea of the
supply chain breakdowns,
you know, the burning of land, and it's
it could be same thing. Right?
But you know what's much, much more of
an obvious example of exactly that? The thing
he's ignoring right now. So I think that's
very telling to me. But he says, tune
in now, Alex Jones lays out the globalist
plan to destroy industrial civilization by intentional government
corporate mismanagement and how we can stop them.
But blah, blah, blah, I don't see the
thing happening right over there. My point is
I think it's very telling that that's the
headline while he's ignoring the other thing. That's
the partisan misrepresentation.
That's the look over there shtick they're all
doing.
But like Lee says, says the guy licking
the boots of the richest oligarch in the
world, who incidentally is a globalist who wants
microchips in your brain in a new world
order. But
nothing to see here.
Another post, he says, the panicked, pedo controlled
UK government threatens to cut ties with the
US if Elon doesn't stop exposing their massive
crimes against children.
Yeah. Again,
very real story about what's going on in
the UK, but what's hilarious to me is
the ignorance around everything else that's blowing up
in front of them. But you're leaning into
the Elon distracted
the distraction dynamic.
The lurching in to look over there while
you're not gonna and you're siding with the
guy who's literally censoring people who are calling
these things out. Right? There's a whole thread
right now. There's a whole grouping of people
that are exposing pedophile networks or sexual predators
in the United States who are being censored
on you on you on Twitter right now.
We've mentioned it in the past.
Or people that are going, what are you
doing, man? What about the stuff here we're
ignoring?
For example,
Mike Honcho says, talk funny name. Talk about
the pedos running America. You've lost our trust.
Look, look through the comments. You'd be shocked
right now to see how common that is
on a platform that seems to be broadly
supporting people on his side.
I find that very telling.
But overall,
I I find it to be an interesting
time to lurch into that conversation. Well, nonetheless,
important things to consider. But that conversation is
one of the same with what's going on
in this country.
Nightwatch Nate.
Again, this is basically what, I think I
think I even have it.
Basically, Joe recently put another post out saying,
you know, Elon, it's official. The the newer
the literally, the new world order has been
stopped because Elon went after sir x y
and z. Like, not a joke. Like, he
because he's talking about a a democrat thing
and saying, they're done. The world leaders are
fleeing and it's over,
as we're watching the the new world order
North American Union be proposed.
Like you I mean, look, you could argue
this is all coincidental, but I find it
really hard to see not to see the
timing of when he decides to go, this
is when he took down the New World
Order while they're pointing to it, or all
the points I've already made. So the point
is Nate Nate watch night watch Nate says,
it's official. Elon Musk just took down the
New World Order. In reality,
this report from Fortune, account suspensions have tripled
on x since Elon Musk took over, or
the main point about literally being a part
of the technocratic New World Order. But as
I unpack flicks play, which is just hilarious
to me, he says, a meme so true,
it makes your brain hurt. And it just
shows a picture of heavier set Alex Jones
in a cheerleading outfit says, give him give
me an e, give me an l. Elon
Musk in the background.
Yeah. Yeah. It really does seem like the
case right now. Another clip you can watch
for yourself of high impact flicks breaking down
Alex Jones literally saying, Elon's getting more done
in the fight against neoliberal
globalist tyranny, but we're okay with the neo
conversion. Right? Except for Donald Trump. Elon Musk
is the game changer.
It's just I you're I mean, talk about
doubling down while people are seeing through it.
It's crazy.
And I simply said that so again, January
7th.
So as we're watching this whole thing kind
of break down,
right? So we're watching what's going on. Israel's
more exposed,
which by the way is part of the
global's agenda that he refuses to highlight, and
he has a breakdown that panic, pedo controlled
UK government threatens to cut ties, and he
brings on Ezra Ezra Levant from the rebel.
A guy who has been so thoroughly sure
I mean, through the whole point from October
7th forward, his team has been so shockingly
exposed as as, like, blindly I mean, almost
more than Daily Wire. Just wildly pro Zionist
at all cost. What's his name? Avi has
lied about 16 different things I've seen because
just like all the rest of the Zionist
line for Israel.
And as as I just framed it like
this, breaking.
Using the lights they all love to use,
making fun of that. Zionist talking with Zionist
about Zionist ploys.
It's it's just sad to me. That's my
opinion. I'll let you read into it what
you will. Now, talking about the comments on
this.
Welcome to the Gulf of America, Betty Johnson
says.
And I'll just show you a few of
them. You'll have a good time reading through
the chat if you want. This guy says,
oh, no. The first were the ones where
people see it. Simply saying, this is the
exact plan of the technocrats
technocratics from the 19 thirties, which is Elon's
background. Right? Welcome to the North American Technate,
which is what they called it. That's part
of the book. And even now today, Elon
Musk calls himself the Technate the Techno King
or Technate King of Tesla.
The same point, this bird oh, that's Kelly.
Thank you for sharing that. She just goes,
yep. It shows you this one as well
as a different one showing the club of
Rome
and all the different areas that they're that's
that is the openly the new world order
agenda.
In this together from, the Independent Media Alliance
as well, we have some more panels coming
up soon. Ian, Ian is together on Twitter.
Says, this is the North American
Technate
proposed by Elon Musk's grandfather,
among others in the 19 thirties. A picture
directly from the book. The point is if
you can't look at the overlap.
So they're real they're right now telling you,
wherever it is, right here,
totally something different though. Look at this new
thing over here we're doing for freedom.
Elon's
grandfather
outlined in the book about technocracy that this
was the case. I mean, come on, guys.
There's only so much you can disregard. Thank
you, Ian, for making sure we solve this.
Plant Destine says Trump is legitimately about to
buy Greenland, liberate Canada, liberate Canada, reclaim my
point is in the context of what their
government is, yes, I would argue they probably
need to be liberated from these
both of our governments though. So you're not
really gonna liberate Canada when you've got the
same problem over here with the same broken
government.
But they they don't they only see Trump
as something different, and it says,
reclaim the Panama Canal, and rename the Gulf
of Mexico Gulf America. I'm starting to think
Trump's vision of America looks something like this.
Yep.
That's the point. It's right there. This is
transparent.
Matthew h simply says, and this is a
influent, a $127,000.
Trump supporting
Republican patriot. Says the Greenland purchase in quotes
and Canada as the 51st state is dumb
and stupid.
We don't have time for this. So I'm
just happy to see that.
There are honest people out there that can
that suddenly don't that maybe we have different
opinions on how things should go, but this
is just transparently this is bought naked imperialism.
And so somebody who is of the mind
that we should be doing things the way
they promised, who finally goes, well, that's not
it. That's wrong. That's just integrity, guys. That's
somebody who's willing to go, I have a
line that's crossed it. You're wrong. Then see,
my point is people in teams for politics,
there is no line.
Trump tells them what to do, they march
to that order. That's what they do.
La, lady MAGA USA says, I don't want
Greenland. I don't want Canada. I want mass
deportations, which by the way is funny. I'll
just say it now. I'll show in a
minute because one of the points people a
joke someone made is, well, maybe that's why
they're doing this. So when no deportations happen
because it was always a ploy, well, they're
gonna go, well, too late. Now we own
it all so they don't have to go
anywhere.
Interesting. So this person's going, I don't want
more land. I want those people out of
this part of the country. It's just showing
you the weird overlap of all these different
opinions. They all think they're on the same
page. But guess what Andrew Tate says,
chiming in with his, you know, totally wholesome
wholesome view.
You're not greedy enough.
I want them all. Right. Here's the the
wholesome background is influencing our generational
generation of children. Right? Andrew Tate, the Republican
influencer. You you're not greedy enough.
By the way, the guy who is literally
still being charged for human trafficking, despite all
the lies, look at Milk Bar TV's work
on this. I just looked into it again.
It's still going. There was just minor things
they had to correct and it has not
been dismissed despite him continuing to lie about
this. Despite him seemingly pretending to be censored
by Twitter because they, I think, want to
frame themselves as being outsiders.
It's just it's just lazy. This guy is
one of the worst people on the Internet.
I I have to stop my opinion. It's
in his own words.
But I want them all. So that that's
the mindset. That that's the kind of person
you're aligning with when you pretend like we
should just take what we want because freedom
or, you know, whatever word makes it sound
okay that we just steal what we
want. Now, here are some other responses.
And it's Again, you've had a good time
looking through this.
Same one of the same well, imperialism is
not globalism. Well, I just simply said the
intersection of the 2 is obvious. And if
you don't understand why, same point I made
before. Right? If you are encroaching and taking
more territory,
and you just did that until you took
over all the territory, well, then clearly you
can see what I mean. Now, that may
not be their goal. I'm not claiming I
know what's in their mind. Anybody doing that
is stupid. Or rather,
I guess, lying to you or in the
somehow belief they can read minds.
My point is that this is a clear
step in the continuing growth of one state
controlling all territory.
It's not hard to wrap your mind around.
Right? So it's incremental, obviously. Globalism is not
like it all of a sudden.
The point is that this and that's what
the EU is a part of. That's what
this is a part of. It's an incremental
step towards that goal.
I I mean, I I know that anybody
on I think this is a very easy
thing to understand. So my point is I
think people are choosing to act like it
doesn't make sense even though it obviously
does. So I simply said the intersection is
obvious. They said, no. It's not. Globalism emerged
after imperialism
and largely fallen after World War 2. Imperialism
has existed for 1,000 okay. So he the
point is there's he feels like he's tapping
into, like, specific definitions of what it rep
these are broad concepts.
Right? Globalism is a broadly defined concept that's
not like it started 1945. I mean, you
can't argue that their ideology sort of began.
My point though is that the idea of
a globalist thing, whether you had identified the
term existed before that, it was controlling every
the point is that you could argue from
a government perspective that there was a plan
put to the idea. That I can go
along with. But the idea of imperialism.
Right? These are just generalized concepts that did
not, like, suddenly have a time frame that
existed between these years and that this is
what it looked like and they've had this
flag.
It's just an idea.
Here's my point is, you're missing the point.
The act
is imperialistic.
Yes. Obviously. Which is about conquest,
no matter how you spin it. Right? One
of the many ways a globalist governance is
brought to fruition.
Con conquest,
obviously,
or political influence, economic sanctions,
cultural manipulation. Like, all of these guys.
Or, again, just straight up conquest.
Pretty simple. Right? I said, it's been written
about many times over. It's very simple, but
I get the sense partisanship is clouding the
issue here.
No response.
The point, I think, is obvious, though. Right?
Like, if you try to make this about
specific definitions, you might lose the point. The
reality is simply that conquest is only one
arm of the same plan.
Simple.
This person says, explain how being in control
with capitalized for some reason of our own
continent is globalism.
Go ahead. Oh, wait. Alright. Very passive aggressive.
The point obviously is
it's not part of the current nation, buddy.
So I don't exactly understand. So first conquest,
and then suddenly and now it's not anymore
because now we own it. Well, as I
said, because it's literally a page right out
of the NWO. Right? You can literally see
that plan for North American Union is part
of that it's very clear.
And the NWO is globalism. Right? Okay. So
and the sustainable development goals, which is the
UN, also regarded as globalism. Okay. So 2
very clear things that highlight that exact picture
as globalism. That seems pretty clear, first of
all. Nasser simply said, you know, the thing
that you were calling out 30 seconds ago
during COVID illusion. Right? Like, the point is
these people were going, that's a problem. And
now suddenly, because it's being presented differently,
that's insulting.
But he said, to me, it seems more
like he wants
oh, well, this wasn't the point. Then I
just highlighted the same image down here so
you can see the overlap.
The point here well, he just goes on
to say that he wants the resources. We
fair point. I think that's part of it.
But the overall reality is, and I I
think I have another one to say this
to or the another person responding, that globalism
if you're in control of your country
and you expand that out to Greenland,
that is one aspect of continue that's expansion.
That's globalism
in one form, in conquest.
Now it might not be the plan they
have, but realize when you talk about the
same consolidation, it's the same idea. Now I
do think they do have that plan, though.
I think that's what makes this obvious that
we're all showing you this. But because he
say basically saying that we wanna control all
of this continent
to make sure we I mean, then you
fill in the blank with why.
So we're all protected. Well, you don't know
what their intentions are. I know they love
to say those things out loud. You don't
know for sure. Don't be naive enough to
believe what they tell you. So at the
end of the day, you're talking about controlling
the continent, which is one continent out of
so many more. That's how this works. I
just think this is transparent. I think people
choose not to hear it.
Same thing here.
I showed that map showing, you know, this
is obviously what part of globalism. And he
simply, that's Americanism, which I'm not even sure
what they think that means necessarily, that it's
what's American to con to to
conquer, I guess. I don't know. Not globalism.
The globe isn't involved. That's the same point.
And I said, oh, so globalism is just
some instant thing?
There are not incremental moves toward that goal?
I I just don't get that point that
it's not the glow so until it's all
of it at the same time, it's not
globalism. Well, that's not even the Republicans are
saying. So this is like mental gymnastics to
try to make this about something else. And
I simply said, it's so wild how you
guys will bend over backwards to make it
make this not what it is.
If this was Biden saying it, I'm sure
you'd all be defending his plan as Americanism
too. Right?
Now I find that to be one of
the most important points. You all know as
well as I as he makes the point
right down here. If this were Biden, of
course, it would be globalism. Right?
He said, no. The Biden puppet could accurately
be called a globalist.
Oh, but because Donald Trump is saying it,
it's not because you know Trump's mind. Right?
I thought I think it's just childish. That's
so naive.
And I said, no. It's not that hard.
Your double standard is very easy to grasp.
And he goes, what? It's like, you can't
even realize that if you think it's only
globalism because Biden says versus Trump, it's the
outcome, the action that makes it globalism. And
you could argue that the intention would matter.
Right? Because all you if you carry it
out. But the point is the action comes
to North American Union whether Trump knew what
he was doing or not. The real picture
still continues to go in that direction.
I just people are just so
desperate to support these people that they miss
the forest for the trees.
This person says, this is actually called nationalism.
So it's all kind of the same argument.
Right? Education is important. Right? Again, but the
whole, you're too stupid to see it. Like,
it just you know, you guys always wonder
why I get in these arguments.
It's because, look, I I post something that's
just a statement, and they you get these
snide comments that I'm not gonna take sense
sitting down. I'm gonna I'm gonna respond in
kind. And then as it scrolls to the
bottom, people go, look. You're all getting angry.
It's like, no. They came into this with
this this effort to be mean.
If somebody comes to me and just goes,
I think this is nationalism. I believe you're
wrong.
You'll never get some kind of angry, mean
response from me unless I somehow take it
out of context, which I've done before, and
then I immediately go, I'm sorry. I've been
arguing with trolls all day, and I misunderstood.
You know, that kind of thing. But
education is important, tealap. And I said I
said, yes. I know. The outlined partisan talking
points that you're all regurgitating.
But maybe you should think a bit more
on it. How exactly is nationalism
how is it nationalism
if none of them are currently part of
the US nation?
By that logic,
any illegal annexation is nationalism.
Education indeed.
Right? So now it's national. So, basically, you
could absorb every continent in the world and
it's still nationalism.
Or just a quick way to deceive you
into thinking nationalism is globalism. Or, you know,
think about how obvious that is.
This person says, glow and all of these
in response to the same thing that blew
up today. Globalism is when America submits to
foreign powers.
Okay. Interesting perspective, but you can see clearly
how everybody has their own opinion about it.
But yet they all think this isn't even
though it's the most clear example we've seen
in a long time. It says Americanism is
when America secures territory under American power.
Okay. So hypothetically speaking, if America had taken
over the rest of the world, would that
not be globalism because America's securing American power?
Oops.
Logical fallacy.
It's just it's so simple to see how
this works. And he goes, you've already lost
and submitted to foreign powers, which is the
point.
Yes, Israel. Or if you wanna list other
Republicans, China. The point is that becomes a
pretty obvious narrative. I mean, it's obvious Israel
has completely influenced this country. So, yes, if
you think that is globalism moment, clearly, you
can see it Or you don't choose to,
obviously.
But I just think it's such a fallacy
to pretend just because of merit. So if
it was China doing it, it wouldn't be
globalism, it would be Chinaism.
Okay. That's just a bad point. It just
doesn't even line up.
But it goes, the traders who submitted us
to foreign powers have been exposed
or not. Well, he wants you to think
it's just Biden, democrats, and China or whatever
else or Ukraine. Not totally the obvious Israel
influence. Donald Trump was elected to correct the
problem. Let's see how it goes. They've already
tried to kill him twice. You see? We've
elected the right guy. You believe in this.
That's not the same as truth. You want
to be. And you let your wants and
desires and beliefs
cloud the truth in front of you.
Same point. This guy this guy says, it's
not globalism,
which spreads American taxpayer money all over the
globe for progressive schemes. Oh, it's only progressives
and democrats see blindness.
This is national security or an early negotiating
position. Oh, so he's trolling,
threatening war for a better deal. That's crazy
and ridiculous. Or it's not just for national
security. So it's all okay as long as
you claim national security, just take land for
people. I mean, guys, how do you believe
what you're saying?
It's not globalism because only globalism is when
you spread American taxpayer money for democrat objectives.
I mean, guys, this is just lazy.
But on top of that, even if it
was
I mean, I you know, I you get
it. I I just don't think we even
need to go through. It's just it's funny.
Brad Miller says no. You're drawing conclusions from
the flawed geopolitical paradigm of nations acting in
their own interests.
Yep.
Breath of fresh air. People actually have brains
out there. Not hard to see how the
world works.
Last one, he says, globalists are not interested
in promoting America or any country's own nationalism.
Let's just take the first sentence. Let's pretend
for a second Anthony Woodcock somehow knows what
all globalists think. Right? That's important. Secondly,
in the we pretend that what you're pointing
to right now somehow is about American nationalism
versus globalism.
That's an opinion.
That's you pretending that you know the intent.
Right? Because expanding currently the continent could feel
like nationalism until suddenly it's not. The point
is you don't know their intent, but you
pretend like you do because Trump said pretty
words on the TV.
But he goes on to say, they are
all about controlling the entire world from the
outside for their own benefit. Yeah. Well, that
sure sounds like what he just discussed or
what Israel is doing with them all around
the world.
And he goes, while keeping those nations in
a weakened state, guys, that's literally American foreign
policy.
If you don't know that by now, keeping
I mean, there's plenty
of conversations and experts and academics that have
outlined this, that what they do is
deliberately keep these nations in in weakened states
so they cannot fight back or so they
can then like, basically, as I said many
times, you occupy a country, you force them
to outsource everything they need from you, and
then you force them to only export what
you need from them.
Every time we can see this. And then
what happens is the moment they go afoul
of your agenda, you pull the rug out.
They can't exist anymore without what you need
to give them, and they paid twice as
much for it. And that's why they stay
impoverished
in one of many, many other ways. But
it says adding more countries to America would
be nationalistic, not globalistic.
Same point. So let's hypothetically say you add
all the countries.
Is it
still nationalistic
just because it's America? Guys, you are being
blinded by your own perspective, your your own
desire to see this as America through Donald
Trump.
It really does make me sad because it's
so transparent.
Now Whitney says I was gonna read earlier.
She says,
people should consider that arguably the main interest
in Greenland,
and also likely Canada as well from the
Trump camp and Musk, is related to vast
mineral deposits,
particularly those necessary for the energy transformation
and EV revolution
that is directly tied to the business interest
of Musk
as well as the other prominent big tech
figures in his circle.
For example,
aside from Musk, Jeff Bezos,
who recently gave very, very generously to Trump's
inauguration fund,
backs a firm called Kobold Metals,
along with Bill Gates,
Reid Hoffman, who both backed Kamal Harris, by
the way, and Mark Anderson, currently advertising Trump
on tech policy that is drilling in Greenland
for EV related minerals minerals right now. So
cloud, cloud,
bread and circus highlighted Panama for you. Or
somebody who donated $10,000,000 with the Trump campaign
has a contract for potentially mining gas there.
So let's pretend like that totally isn't the
reason. Right? Like, I actually think it's more
than that. I do think it's a larger
agenda, but clearly, he's profiting from.
So not only is he selling you out
to globalism, he's profiting from it on the
way. Typical.
But it also
these aspects that we just highlighted have currently
the rise to drill in Greenland
for EV related minerals.
I don't know how you could ignore that.
Northern Canada also possesses significant deposits of minerals
essential for ED production. By the way, production.
By the way, the very production that most
Republicans act like isn't gonna happen, even though
Elon is aggressively in support of it and
tells you that's the future no matter what.
Quote, the digital transformation that the Silicon Valley
oligarchs are attempting to manifest would, admittedly, require
all of the known deposits of lithium, nickel,
and cobalt, cobalt, and several other minerals across
the planet. Okay. Interesting point back to earlier.
Do you know what else has very clear
and huge deposits of cobalt specifically?
Congo,
Haiti.
What a coincidence.
Or lithium, for example. Venezuela
and the country that I just mentioned as
well.
I mean, it's just painfully obvious, guys.
The US itself is not necessarily rich in
these minerals with some occasional exceptions, but some
of its neighbors are.
If you are cheerleading for this, be aware
that it, 1, will help accelerate the sustainable
development digital transformation
that needs these minerals specifically.
2, is not in the interest of the
public of any of these countries, but instead
in the interest of mainly of American tech
billionaires. But if you if if to you
that Sunil still means nationalism, then all for
it. Right?
No. It's the opposite. Number 3, we'll devastate
the environment of Canada and Greenland. Mining these
things can permanently wreck the environment and water
table. As far as I could tell, it
almost always does. If you look up any
of these massive lithium mine, I mean, it
is they it's a a wasteland after they're
done. It's wild. Number 4, boosting access to
EV med metals will also likely require existing
incentives to purchase EV cars in the US
to stay so these mining ventures have a
high return on investment.
Trump has spoken about removing them, but his
ties to Musk and other big tech bill
billionaires suggest it is unlikely.
Narrative versus outcome.
And of course, Janet x girl makes the
point. Another example was his motivation to overthrow
Venezuelan government. Remember, and and put in the
guy that could barely walk on his own.
Because that makes sense. Right?
It does when you understand what they're really
trying to accomplish. And this is it says
uranium, but realize they have a huge lithium
deposit in Venezuela as well as gold and
plenty of other things.
Gold is also important for electronics as well.
But here's the a couple other points to
wrap it up here, guys. Here's Doge News
going, do you support the name change of
Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America?
Now this one's interesting. This one seems to
be almost, like, especially because of the way
that Benny Johnson leaned into it. And I'll
show you next. Like, I'll say it in
a second.
To me, I get the sense this was
almost meant to make it all look clownish.
Like, you didn't meet who cares about the
gulf the name of the Gulf of Mexico?
It's about the conquest and everything else. Right?
They already control the area and water wise.
They don't they don't that's about trying to
I think that's like an inner distraction from
what's actually happening, but almost meant to make
it feel ridiculous.
Or I could be wrong. That means his
hubris in wanting to make it about America.
But it's so dumb, isn't it? And this
person says, Trump announces plan to rename the
moon Space America. Right? It's just stupid. And
this, of course, this one goes this too.
They're just so amped up on their own
self importance about what America is. I mean,
you guys, by what you're doing with this,
you are actually
undermining what America is really about. At least
what we believe it is in the origin
point. You're now it's like it's like what
they've done with Bitcoin, you're doing to America.
It's the same damn thing.
And so here is the point.
Benny Johnson says, yes. Trump just declared that
he's changing the name of the Gulf of
Mexico to Gulf America. I love it. What
do you think about it? Okay. So here
but that sounds different if you read it.
Watch the video.
You tell me what you think about the
way he presents this.
President Trump just shot the world by announcing
live he's going to rename the Gulf of
Mexico
the Gulf of America.
Look how beautiful that looks. This makes a
lot of sense, by the way, because the
longest border with the Gulf of Mexico is
actually American. It's the American military and the
American economy that protect this Gulf and that
make this such a vital shipping port and
such a important economic area. This is president
Trump making this announcement. We're gonna be
Now you get the point. Right? So none
even though he's making points that clearly seem
to go, yes. We need this, and this
is why it's important. You got, like, barnyard
music in the background, and then he's like,
that is beautiful. Like, it almost seems like
a joke. Right? I'm not very familiar with
this content,
but you tell me if that's normal.
Either way, I get the sense that it's
kind of like we're kinda trolling if we
want to play that card, but but not
though. If we you know, it's just nonetheless,
all of it amounts to the same thing.
It is the expansionist mindset of these the
very I mean, it's the opposite of what
you guys all pretend are your values in
the context of at least what the people
that believe the narrative versus those that know
what's really going on and only are in
this for political gain and financial gain and,
you know, Zionism and
oligarchy, whatever else we're talking about.
And this is
David Icke,
to Alex Jones saying, Gulf of America. Trump
announces plan to rename Gulf of America. David
Icke says, the anti globalist is now a
globalist.
Somebody's been calling this for as long as
you can see, guys. It's if anybody knows
what globalism looks like, it's David Icke. He
says works either way with Jones or Trump.
You are a disgrace, mister Jones, and you
are everything you once claimed to rail against.
North American Union? Oh, that's so yesterday, Elon
told
me. I sad. Turncoat, a person who changes
from one opinion to an opposite one in
a way that shows they are not loyal
to people who share the original opinion. Cambridge
dictionary.
Yeah. Sure sounds like it right to me.
Oops. Left that in there.
Now, just this last couple points on this.
Like, the obvious it's unreal that this is
even being floated.
Like, again, maybe it's meant to make it
seem so bombastic that you almost can't believe
this is real that this is like again,
I I do you I'll I'll read it
first. Do you think this is real? Elon
Musk puts this on the 6th. America should
liberate the people of Britain from their tyrannical
government.
I mean, how else do you read that?
So
invade
and free them from their government, or or
what? I mean, I'll go, of course. The
point is it seems so outrageous that you
go, he he has to be kidding. Like,
that but but is he, though? Like, it
doesn't like, the point is Greenland and the
rest of them are just the point is
it doesn't even matter anymore.
You are now openly as a powerful entity
of the incoming administration
floating the idea of military conflict with major
powers.
You I don't care if you think it's
a joke or not. This is so wildly
irresponsible and childish.
This is this is what the that's actually
what I said.
Trolling or not, this is what all the
quote adults in the room support,
which is what they were really pushing about
the, you know, lesser of evils, the adults
in the room.
Really?
I said, f f f for f sake.
Find the courage to stand up to these
team sport politics clowns. I refuse to believe
most of us are this gullible or this
stupid.
And apparently, 58% out of almost 2,000,000 people
said yes.
Now the pay the Patriot Voice
says, what about America liberating America from our
own tyranny first?
America first. America only. Right? So that, I'm
glad to see people are going, yes. You
are now prom you were it's the opposite.
America first was what you said. That's not
what you're doing right now. Some people have
integrity.
I went on to say, and in case
you are unfamiliar with my work, this is
in no way a defense of the UK
government
or any government for that matter. And this
is calling out a ploy to divide and
sow chaos in order to roll out the
very plan many conservatives feel they are fighting.
And Nick says, you work your butt off.
I gotta oh, that this is actually interesting.
He says, I gotta say you are the
only person I would constantly get frustrated at,
thinking it was because I hated party politics
so much when you called out the uni
party brainwashing.
Eventually, it made me step back and have
to swallow the fact that I wasn't infallible
at leaning into the BS also, and that's
what it actually was. It was good lesson
on keeping myself accountable. Thanks, man. That's a
great thing to say. Thank you. Because the
point is, I do we all fall. I
do I make the mistake. We all, at
some point, fall for it. It's all just
about keeping yourself in check and asking whether
you might be tricked by it. The point
being that the partisan stuff, it lean it
it uses what you believe and want and
you're deep like, it's easy to fall for
it. But I'm glad to see people like
it's it makes me feel proud of the
work that somebody like this who at first
kinda goes here made him mad. Eventually, he
now, you know,
he sees it now. That's
just powerful.
But so as he's threatening war with the
UK, right, and Greenland and Panama and economic
war with Canada,
I said, look and look at all those.
And this is interesting, the overlap with the
UK part as he's going, should we liberate
them? As they're all supporting a wildly pro
Israel candidate to run, Pierre Poliviar.
It says, now look at those who are
suddenly flocking to support this man, Pierre.
And ask yourself, why? Is that America first?
Is it UK first? Or is it in
the interest of another nation entirely?
As in a recent discussion, the next prime
minister of Canada was asked whether he would
support Israel striking Iran nuclear facilities, and he
said it would be a gift by the
Jewish state to humanity.
That's what he said.
An illegal act. An attack an act of
terrorism that would most definitely hurt an a
huge amount of civilians.
But that's what he said.
My God.
And so that's the point. Is that America
first? Is that UK first? Is Elon screaming
support this guy? Is that any of those
things?
As I'll just show you this since this
is what it's from. Patrick Hennington says, a
perfect example of shallow opportunism
that fuels Elon Musk's cell of pure paid
surrogates.
Here's Ian Myles Chong. Nigel Farage is England's
last hope because that's what they were saying
recently, Elon included. Support this man.
Nigel Farage should be in charge of the
UK right now. Elon steps in and says,
the reform party needs a new leader. Farage
doesn't have the what it takes.
Right after that, Ian Miles Chong, spineless and
self serving. Nigel Farage isn't the leader Britain
needs.
God, what a pandering child. Like, that's so
embarrassing.
But they're getting paid like Laura and the
rest. 200,000 subscribers, guys. They're getting a ton
of money from pandering to Elon Musk.
Elon says, had this election not been won
by Donald Trump,
civilization
would be lost.
I mean, my god. So now so everywhere.
Apparently, had Donald Trump not won, the world
was over. Every civilization
as it's in it's entirety would have been
lost.
I mean, guys, this is just like saying
most important election of our lifetime. They just
never stopped.
This is an ongoing grift because I think
they very clearly know what they're doing to
you.
Isn't that just silly? I mean, you I
mean, this is say it's bombastic Trump. The
same thing. Could you just say that the
country would have been lost? I mean, this
is just stupid. What in world?
And this person goes, Germany is next.
And he goes, definitive.
Oh, so now Germany too. Good. Good. Okay.
So now,
the UK is gonna be overthrown. Greenland's gonna
be overthrown. Panama's gonna be overthrown. Canada's gonna
be economically attacked. And Germany will be next.
I mean, if you can't see by now
why people in the world are like, Elon
has lost his effing mind, or that he
like, it's not the peep the the team
support around him that are acting like, he's
just just reach me. You just say what
you want. Yeah. You ever say whatever you
want.
But as you guys are so fond of
pointing out when you don't wanna call the
other side,
free speech has its consequences. And you're right.
And what he's doing is so ridiculously irresponsible
and is going and probably already has created
real world consequences.
Sal, the Agarest, of course, with a breath
of fresh air putting out logic as usual
says, $40,000,000,000,000
in debt,
and they're worried about renaming the Gulf of
Mexico?
What an effing joke.
Right. Like, we really think that's what they're
thinking about, guys. This is about getting you
all riled up and hiding things I think
are right around it.
Just a thought, says Americans.
No no new world order. No globalization.
No one world government. Stand your ground.
Also, Americans,
let's acquire Canada, Greenland, Mexico. I see nothing
wrong, questionable, or at odds with this.
And that's not all Americans, by the way,
but definitely a part of the team sport
politics, which I know she highlights.
And Andrea Lynn says first, conservatives
and I would just simply, as my opinion,
teams for Republican politics and those falling for
it, went from opposing globalism
to cheering it on and embracing the new
world order now that their guy is promoting
it. Cognitive dissonance at an all time high.
Now people like, I think honest conservatives that
are calling it out were saying that's not
true. And so she responded and said, I
stand corrected. I am referring to fake conservatives.
I would just say, well, you frame it
however you want.
MAGA leftist in red hats in this tweet.
True conservatives do not support globalism in the
world order. Well, so you you can however
you want. That gets in her logic then
that means Alex Jones is a democrat. You
can take what you want. The point is
people that are calling this out
are are able have integrity in my opinion
because it is consistent with what Republicans have
previously been calling out.
Saudi Agris, it's just it's a meme that
says MAGA crowd and fake libertarians
at the moment. Door on the left says,
fix the country's current problems.
On the right, annex more territory. And it
shows everybody jamming to get into the annex
door.
And somebody just says, it's the same door.
Gosh darn it, man. I could just people
just almost choose to not see the point.
Are you really pretending that annexing more territory
is going to solve America's problems?
We can't be this stupid.
And then same meme, and this person shares
this this meme. It's that same old classic
democrat woman that's that became like this classic
GIF of, like, her going getting,
triggered
at that rally where she lose the glasses,
she lose her mind. And they they superimposed
a MAGA hat on her. And it says,
you don't get it. The USA is acquiring
other countries is small government snowflake.
It's just funny. It is funny. The the
woke ride overlap,
these things being turned back against them. It's
funny. But it's just sad to see that
it's all just been one manipulation. You know?
Lastly,
this person says, it's how they plan on
oh, that's what I said earlier. So the
same thing, the North American Union. And I
need to say it's it's how they plan
on justifying when there are no deportations.
It's all ours now. So no need to
deport anybody.
Hey. Maybe he's right. Seems like it works.
Now, last last point before I end with
the clip is that ultimately,
I get the sense that there's a lot
more coming as I think we all do.
And if you can see right now how
transparently this is all kind of imploding,
like, how even conservatives are calling it out,
like, they've lost I think just like with
the Israel thing or COVID 19, they're
I think they're lose I think they're rushing
or whatever else. There's some reason that they
can't, like, take 10 years to slowly work
us into this, and they're just ramming it
through.
My point is that they are now people
are seeing through it. Right? So what are
they gonna do?
There's only so many times you can lurch
into some democrat pedophile narrative or, you know,
whatever else. You go look over there. Even
though those things are
real. So what I'm seeing here is John
Cohen coming out and saying, listen carefully.
What did the guy to Elon's left just
tell him?
What were they told today?
And if you listen to the clip, the
guy is basically saying, we could basically, they're
doing like a thing for,
SpaceX
launches, Mars, and all that. And the guy
is basically saying, we wanna we need to
treat this like and the thing says Elon
Musk's extreme sense of urgency is unmatched. And
the guy says, we were told to act
as if we had a, a meteor coming
within 4 days. And that's the kind of
urgency we should have. And Elon's just speaking
really funnily or funnily funny. And the guy
goes, who knows? Maybe we do.
That's the point.
The only indicate the only suggestion
right here
is that maybe they know something we don't.
Maybe there's an asteroid coming and we're all
gonna die. So blindly go along with their
agenda. That's what I sense from this, which
is kind of sad or disappointing, I guess.
But either way, yeah. I mean, look, it
says 4 years to die. 4 years to
live.
I mean, really, guys? Really?
Really, John? You're gonna make it about the
next 4 years? We have to let them
do it because they're trying to save us
from something we don't know is coming?
I mean, maybe. I would never say it's
not possible, but come on. If if you
wanted a
a blank check to let them roll out
globalism for years, that'd be the way to
do it.
I hope we're smarter than this.
And I will end, of course, with the
clip of the ghost of the machine part
2.
Because, guys, we're living through a psychological operation
time I've never seen before. Like, this is
they're telling you they're doing it even. And
I mean, it's just never been this transparent
my in my lifetime of doing this. But
thank you for your continued support. Thank you
for continuing to stand up for the truth.
I mean, I I honestly, at least in
my lifetime, I've never seen a more important
time to find the courage to stand up
for what you know is right,
what you know is the truth.
Even if you're wrong, by the way, it
still takes integrity
to fight for what you believe is true.
And then it takes even more integrity to
if you end up finding out you're wrong,
to come forward and say, it turns out
I was wrong. Right? That it's this is
what we're seeing in this conversation is these
people that are evolving their opinion as new
information comes along. That is intelligence.
The other side of it is people that
will stick to what they think regardless of
new information. That's called ignorance.
And many cases, willfully so.
So thank you for finding the courage to
do what's right.
Even though it's hard right now more than
ever, especially if you're in a partisan side.
So thank you for being here. Thank you
for standing up. I love you all. As
always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
There are many people
in the world
who really don't understand.
Freedom
has many difficulties,
but we have never had to put a
wall up to keep our people in.
Freedom is indivisible.
And when one man is enslaved,
all are not free.
Modern wars become a struggle for men's minds
as well as for their body.
Today, we face an enemy who spends enormous
sums of money and manpower
all over the globe in the
thinking of the people of the free world,
confused,
revived,
and ultimately the subject.
It is a contest unlike any we have
ever faced in our history as an issue.
Contest for the minds and hearts of people
around the world,
all people.
When power corrupts,
poetry cleanses.
We must never forget
that art is not a form of propaganda.
It is a form of truth.
Psychologists find that control of emotions can be
gained by understanding the stimulus response at
the
feet.
Many
everyday
things
become
associated
with
these
primary
stimuli,
hopefully,
by
a
process
called
conditioning.
It's a strange shadowy world. The doctor's photograph,
the misquotation,
insinuation, and the lie.
I think of fire connecting me to molecules.
You've got to get a hold of yourself.
We'll
light our country and all who serve
it, and the growth of that fire
and truly
light
the
world.
Yes. In modern warfare, our military leaders are
finding that words and ideas
are highly effective weapons.