Israeli embassy was unusual.
My very first day at the CIA, we
had a senior FBI agent come to talk
to the new higher class.
And one of the things that he said
has stuck in my mind
all of these 32 plus years.
We were talking about trying to spot spies
who were spying on us. Most embassies here
in Washington have what are called declared officers.
Those are foreign intelligence officers who are here,
formally known to the FBI and the CIA
as intelligence officers.
This FBI agent told us at the time
that the Israeli embassy was unusual.
The Israeli embassy had 2 declared officers, 1
from Shin Bet and 1 from Mossad.
And it had
187
undeclared officers
that the FBI had been able to identify
spread out all across America,
in academia,
in the defense contracting industry.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Sunday, January 5, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
Probably gonna be a longer show. Got a
lot to get to today. I have some
interesting takes on some things today that well,
I mean, I probably what you might expect
that I would have some takes on today,
but I just shows an interesting direction, I
guess. Let's put it that way in regard
to what I see this channel through, like,
the the Twitter
censorship,
Elon Musk kind of implosion,
which is it's fascinating to watch. Like, almost
in a way, I'm
checking myself and wondering whether I'm being pulled
into something that's distracting, let's just say, from
the many genocides going on in the world,
which we're gonna touch on today as well.
But it's just this interesting yeah. Like, my
point is that it's fascinating. When you when
you, like, when you can see the current
partisan dynamic, when
it's like I we call it team sport
politics. Right? When it starts to feel entertaining,
when it's kind of like like, just start
checking yourself and asking whether or not this
is something that is pulling you in when
it's not necessarily
the most newsworthy or the most or whether
it's all completely a psychological operation. One of
which today we're gonna discuss that has just
completely imploded in a different conversation, which I'm
sure you're all very aware of.
And yet, it's interesting. Same conversation. The interesting
part is how it keeps going forward. And
yet what, I mean, what that really defines
for us. And I'm seeing, at least hopefully
I mean, I am seeing it, but hopefully
more than
not be getting toward the majority of conservatives
beginning to see that there's just something amiss
here. Now I really wanna stay out of
the gate. This is I really been trying
to kinda parse this out and say, you
know, team sport politics, I see as the
not the majority of either side of the
paradigm that don't care about anything other than
their agenda.
Then you've got the kind of a middle
overlap there. But then I think the majority
of either Liberals, which I'm sure most of
the Republicans disagree with, and then conservatives, which
I'm sure the Liberals disagree with the same
way as always. But the majority of that
background
that are good people, that just genuinely want
good. They want the right thing for the
country, and they just get played back and
forth by this paradigm and don't know what
else to do. And what I'm hoping is
that right now
I mean, one of those examples, by the
way, was during the COVID 19 dynamic for
a lot of people on the other side
of this conversation.
But right now, that these conservatives are seeing
this
and and recognizing something's amiss. And the way
the the point is not to fall back
into this because of some other narrative or
some other agenda or because you don't know
what else to do. It's important that we
begin to call out what this shows us.
And I'm hoping that it begins to make
them realize as as I see it,
that there's only two sides here, and that
is ultimately the people of this country and
the power structure trying to subject to to
subjugate you.
And I just think it's more obvious than
ever. And I think more than ever right
now, we're sensing something different.
That what's happening with this technocratic direction, and
we're watching this this very rapid escalation rollout
as the very things that we were fighting
are now becoming propped up from the same
side, at least pretending to fight it within
the paradigm.
And it just keeps going.
And I think we're at a point now
where this is not just the usual politics.
And, again, I don't think this is that
I think everybody feels this. Right now, it's
more than just the pat the the typical
power structure back and forth. We're watching them
kinda pull out stops,
expose things that really do demonstrate in my
eyes that they're basically just one entity
and rushing us forward through the only side
of this that might be able to pacify
what would be the obvious resistance,
the basically, the great reset or whatever other
direction that kind of overlaps. I mean, we
have a lot of different names for it,
but just technocracy.
Using things that we're talking about. The the
technological control structures, both internally and externally.
The biometric scans, the social credit dynamic, the
the,
what's the other one just was just reading
about today? We're gonna just have an earlier
part about that whole, stay back point, but
all the different elements of this. And I
mean, these are all the early aspects. What
I am most terrified about, which I, as
you guys well know, which I see coming
up more and more, even the whole fog
conversation brought this up in a way that
I feel was kind of meant to pacify
it, to hide it.
The whole Alex Jones effect if you as
if I as I've called it in the
past. You know, the gay frog dynamic where
it's a real topic but gets kind of
covered in this ridiculous
exterior which makes people ignore it, which is
the smart dust or nanotechnology,
or even the overlap with the neuroscience we're
gonna touch on today. This stuff is very
it's right in front of us right now.
And even with the overlap of the,
cyber truck the Las Vegas, New Orleans attacks,
genuinely even, I think almost more so within
the conservative side of this, starting to ask
these questions, like, what's going on here? Weirdly
enough, while the leader part you know, the
it depends on how you stand there, but
the point is that Alex Joneses and Elon
Musk and Trumps of the world are now
lurching into this bad Muslim invading conversation yet
again. I have some really interesting points on
that today.
That just seems to I mean, there's obviously
points within this that matter, But the idea
of making this all about one
ideology,
when really it you can see very clearly
the one that they're all choosing to ignore,
which is driving most of this. But on
top of that, that this is an effort
to kind of shove us away from what
we're all noticing right now. As Elon Musk
just spent the last 2 days screaming about
something going on in the UK, which there's
valid points we'll make about this conversation,
but immediately trying to use big con things
like Democrats going after Trump.
Right? Muslim gay, rapist circles in the UK.
Like, things that are gonna get people to
look anywhere other than what is imploding right
in front of him. That's not to say
these are stories that are not worth your
attention.
But it's it's actually funny, by the way,
that we're being told to you know, why
are you always focusing focusing on Israel, which
is not actually the reality,
while we have this going on in our
country, while we have our election coming up?
Right? And now we have so much going
on in this country right now, and they're
going, look at the UK.
Look over there. It's just isn't that exactly
what we were just called out for? Why
wouldn't you be going Elon? Why don't you
care about this country? Which the point is,
you can show him talking about it elsewhere.
But it's very interesting. But we're gonna go
around this conversation around how clearly this is
falling apart and what this is revealing to
everybody
and the massive algorithmic shift that he's laying
on top of it, which is just, I
mean, embarrassing.
I I I just don't know how honest
people, whatever side you're on, are not seeing
this for exactly what it looks like. And
even if you don't think what I think,
that you can obviously tell this is not
what was promised.
It's just one step away. These aren't even,
like, incremental steps anymore. This is a massive
lurch into not free speech zone and people
just act like it's the natural evolution of
you know, whatever the narrative is to control
what you're looking at. But we're also gonna
tuck it on Israel, as I said, some
developments. Not a huge portion at the end
of the show today, but it says keep
us updated on what's going on, some very
important dis developments in Syria. For example, a
very famous video that Trump made viral by
retweeting about a terrorist
dropping, destroying a virgin Mary.
Well, that person just got appointed to a
lead position in Syria's new government. So it's
funny as as you have the the Republican
TeamSport politics side of this, which Trump and
Elon and the rest seem to be leading,
making this argument about how it's the bad
Muslims invading our country or anywhere else we're
talking about
while ignoring Israel's involvement in manufacturing
all the things and how they are funding
the elements that they usually point to. But
that Trump can make an example in that
tweet about that is the problem coming to
this country. Look, and it's in the UK,
and then that person becomes in power in
Syria that they all support right now.
Kinda easy to see what that shows you,
but we'll leave it there to open with.
I'm gonna start with a couple of things
that I want to highlight,
to suffice. Funny enough, somebody's just giving me
a hard time about this in our in
our chat on our, wire chat, which by
the way we still use but it seems
to be diminishing more and more. You guys
can post that in the comment section if
in the chat if you wanna let people
join our wire chat. It's just something we
did after we got deleted off of Discord.
But it seems to be diminishing, so it's
not worth you know? But if you wanna
join, please put the link in the chat.
That somebody was giving me a hard time
about this. This is our mon this is
TLab Monero
donations. Now I do like Monero for the
very purpose that it is is is
everything out there, it is legitimately, as far
as I can tell, anonymous.
Not in the Bitcoin way where it's anonymous
still, but that you can actually see the
transactions. You just are unable to use that
cryptographic address to be able to find out
who was using it while somebody posts it.
Other than conversations of quantum,
computing, which is there's a whole conversation about
whether that's even possible today. But the point
is, Monero is if it is out there,
the most the the best example of a
a a legitimate
peer to peer exchange of of completely anonymous
private money. Right? So if you're out there
and you're, like, rightly so,
worried
about what we're talking about and about the
fact that somebody's watching you donate to me
and what that might mean, which, trust me,
I get it. Here's a way you can
do that if you would like to. And
so take you can pause this, take a
screenshot of the bar code, which, by the
way, or rather the QR code, which, by
the way, I highly recommend. You never use
anywhere ever for the rest of your life,
but that's just my opinion. But down there
is the actual primary address. So just wanna
put it out there because people keep asking
me about the Monero and I just keep
forgetting to bring it up. I have now
posted it. I don't believe it's in today's
show notes just because I added it after
I had posted that. But going forward, I
will have that in the show notes. So
thank you all for who by the way
just,
you know, trying to get ways to find
me. I appreciate that. I really do. As
much as I'm dragging my feet in places
I shouldn't. Now
this is the sentiment for today.
You're all very aware of. But
for me personally,
something that I think is it's difficult. Right?
Because
I will never
be an advocate for violent response. I just
will not do that. Now that's not to
say that I don't have a very clear
understanding of situations
where that becomes
justifiable, if not necessary.
Somebody's
attacking my family. I will not hesitate for
a second to carry out violence against those
people. Very clear. That's that's be that is
the way the world works. If I'm defending
myself, if you're trying to commit violence against
me or you're trying to steal from me,
I'm gonna I that that's my point. This
is this is the
the real this is the what I mean,
I'm trying to avoid an ideological point. Just
the point is that they're for, like, libertarian,
anarchist, the idea that this is how these
things ultimately come down to if you believe
in, you know, the the the real principle
of the non aggression. Like, not just
justifiable
situations for violence. I mean, this is something
that I'm very, very, very, very adamant about.
Because, ultimately, when you commit violence, you open
the door for reaction. Right? And so in
this case, the government, I think, has created
a circumstance
where it's almost like they're coaxing us into
certain reactions so they then can use that
to shut things down. This isn't even. This
is a very public and well thought out
discussion.
My point though is that all that's it's
all to say that we're in a position
now where I keep bumping up against this
thought. I brought it up more than once.
Where it's like, okay. What do we do
now? Right? I think we're becoming very uncomfortably
aware of the true nature of our world.
Hopefully,
maybe not the world, but I do think
it's the case. Maybe just certain governments. But,
I mean, I think it's just the reality
of government in our world, which is ultimately
that when it comes to it, like it
is with Israel and its genocide, that they
simply can just hold the line.
There's enough people in the partisan
nonsense that keep it anything from actually happening
whether violence or not.
And so they just go, well, no one's
doing anything.
So let's just keep going forward. Like, if
if the worst we're gonna get is them
yelling at us, then what does it matter?
And see, this is where I come up
against the idea. Then history, this in history,
this is where we'd be marching down the
streets with pitchforks and and torches and going,
you're no longer welcome here, but that's not
the world we live in anymore. Because they're
far more technologically advanced in ways that we
can't even grasp, seeing as how they've like,
ask John Rappaport about the different patents of
technological advancement we're never gonna hear about or
see, and they're probably I mean, it's a
whole new conversation, but also just weaponry. And
also my point is that's not what I
believe in, and I'm not never called for
that. I think violence begets violence. But the
reason I'm making a point about this to
start is that we as obviously, if you're
reading the quote, you already get where I'm
going.
John f Kennedy, those who make peaceful revolution
impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. Now, that
is just a basic objective reality in my
opinion.
But then we have to ask even if
that is justifiable, the reality is is it
not still something you're driving us toward?
Is that not something they're aware of too?
Knowing that if they do that, we will
be forced to take and then that becomes
a you know, see what I'm saying? And
it's I'm I'm not providing a solution here
by any means. But I want us to
think about what this means. That we're in
a position where we have people who are
feigning to care about us, who are literally,
like they're like that meme I guess that's
not the right meme. But, basically, they're driving
us against each other. They are forcing us
to create conflict so that can be used
to justify our control.
And there's only 2 ways to look at
it. That ultimately, we have to find another
avenue, whether that's through I mean, whatever you
think it could be, to actually circumvent this
kind of divide and conquer dynamic we've always
lived in or it amounts to violence. And
I don't believe that's the path.
But I just think it's clear or important
that we recognize that we are being driven
toward that right now. Whether I mean, as
right now we're talking about in different conversations,
that, Whitney was just tweeting about, like, the
idea of the clash of civilizations that they
seem to be driving into reality. And that
guys, that is the Muslim bad conversation that
they're, like,
on a I just out of nowhere. I
mean, it's not out of nowhere. They've been
talking about it, but it just seems to
be this lurching conversation,
I think, obviously, because their other things are
falling apart. But clearly, that has been shoved
into the conversation now and that's taking over
a lot. Then we've got the the CIA
Sean Ryan interview which is the point I
was making earlier, this imploding narrative that seems
to have already shifted away that he's still
alive. No. He's not. Now he's dead and
he's dead all over the place. And and
based on nothing but subject subjective
trust me information. There's also information coming out
that it seems to argue that the,
email they were showing was something that was
being typed. And there's all these different points.
It's falling apart in real time. What what
is the moral of the story?
Iran bad guy, Iran in you know, Al
Qaeda internal inside or Joe Rogan as well.
Al Qaeda cells inside of our country. Now
I will never say that's not they're not
possible. The point is any of the things
are possible. But But the point to make
is that, obviously, if we're talking about Al
Qaeda and ISIS, are we still forgetting the
obvious
nonnegotiable
they are ice Israeli US proxy elements. This
is not negotiable. The receipts are clear. Whether
they're controlling today, you could debate that. But
the reality is very, very clear. So if
that's the case, I think we have to
discuss why and who that would relate to.
Does that mean Muslims are doing that? Why
would that even make sense to anybody other
than the narrative they've constructed?
It is clear where this ties back to.
And so this narrative is spinning around
about how
c I mean, really,
the same old north is they hate us
because of our freedom. And then, ultimately, the
CIA talking to the CIA want us to
know that we're a threat. And then Trump
goes, bring in the CIA.
It all works out. Right? Not we're fighting
the deep state by working with the deep
state. Anyway,
point is all of this I think is
being done to make it very uncomfortable for
everybody and don't take the bait.
They want this to be the reality. But
I'll tell you right now that this may
be inevitable. And I this may be exactly
what's being driven. And I want you to
ask yourself,
if that's the case, who benefits from that?
Do you think your government benefits from that?
Do you think they wanna rule over the
ashes? Or is it somebody who's literally,
literally talking about their ideology that necessitates that
to happen before they can then rule over
the ashes, or rather the way they would
frame it? But think about that, how clear
that is. Who benefits is almost always
a very clear indicator of who is involved.
Not always who is exactly
responsible,
but people who benefit from these things usually
stand out. And right now, I'll tell you
what, there's only really one group that I
can see who benefits from us
turning you know, basically, not just from the
individual sides, but the entire country, government included,
fighting itself.
Now I wanna point out a couple of
things that we
recently, this was yesterday, actually. I put out
2 really good interviews. This one was the
one I think is really important. Now, obviously,
I knew this. There's a lot of people
who disagree with his with his premise and
what he believes in all of this. And
as I think I made clear, I mean,
I'm still very skeptical about all of it.
And and I think what's important about this
is just to consider, like we've always talked
about, the idea of a tool.
And whether that still may be something like
with the Internet being used to actually fight
back, which it clearly is, but while being
aggressively skeptical the entire time. And and just
so just so, because somebody had reached out
and asked about others as well, but I've
already reached out to Mark Goodwin from Unlimited
Hangout to come on and talk about it
because he has a different opinion, right, about
the idea. At least it seems from me
doing his work, very clearly seems to think
this was something that was started from the
government perspective, which, by the way, just like
the Internet, still would not invalidate the way
he sees this. But the point is simply
about how
Bitcoin has been commandeered.
And you could argue that it was or
started by a government entity that, you know,
ultimately, nonetheless, has still been steered into a
way to control us versus the if you
wanna think it was cut started by the
government, that would mean that they
pretended
to scre create something that was appear to
peer circumventing the government dynamic. I just don't
see how that lines up really, the idea
that they would create the tool that would
be that could be, if we followed through
with the original vision even though they derailed
it, could be used to fight them. Why
that would make sense? I why would they
just create the original anyway, it's all subjective.
It's all hypothetical. The point though is that
this, in his mind, is a is a
reality, which I think is very clearly backed
up by what he's presenting.
That the government has essentially the power structures,
let's put it, have commandeered
what Bitcoin originally was. And that's what right
now, BTC, they call Bitcoin, is not actually
Bitcoin. It is the fork that they have
basically, because they have enough power and and
influence behind it, have maintained the name and
the brand. But the original vision
is not even Bitcoin Cash, I'll argue. It's
BSV, which actually stands for Bitcoin Satoshi Vision.
Now it's not to get into all of
now. I know plenty of people disagree with
all of that. And maybe it's all government
manipulation. Maybe it's all the movies we're running
from. The point, nonetheless, is his opinion
that
there is a possibility to use the original
idea
that goes well beyond cryptocurrency, well beyond the
idea of money to create something
that could actually help us fight back. Now
I don't know why anybody would dismiss that
out of hand.
I think it's well worth your time to
consider what he has to say, look at
his work, and just give it a thought.
I think it's a powerful idea. It's the
again, same like with the Internet. The idea
that ultimately, it's something that could be used
to in the exact same way it's being
used against us to fight back and create
something. Like, again, the idea if you actually
read the white paper, the origin idea
to create something that would be used to
be able to circumvent the governments.
In fact, I just did this last time.
I should just read. I wrote this is
the intro I wrote for the the interview.
It says, joining me today is Mitch Burcham,
director of advanced studies at the Blockchain Academy.
By the way, this was the guy I
met him in Sedona at the by the
it's funny because people will seem to be
responding to this as if this it's just
interesting. This guy this this guy is I
met him in Sedona at the Libertarian Conference.
Right? So very much in the mind, anarchism,
the idea that these the government shouldn't even
exist kind of mindset. So keep that in
mind when you're listening to his thoughts. A
lot of people seem to think it's like
some pro government,
you know, like, takeover controls. That's the opposite
of what his mind is. His mind is
going towards a world using this technology to
fight that and create a world where we
don't need them. And that's
again, maybe it's a ploy. I disagree,
in relation to how he's presenting it, but
consider that it could be.
So the point is and I'm oh, I
met him in Sedona, and we ended up
talking about this. Because we're you know, the
whole conference was amazing. I was talking about
ways to get away from this controlling world
that we live in. And he offered to
get let me go through this course, which
apparently they just said Tucker Carlson's gonna be
taking and all this different stuff. It's a
it's a high level course, which is I
mean, some of it's beyond over my head,
to be honest. You know, the it's a
really, really interesting course about how to understand
this and the ins and outs. And I
mean, I've learned so much more in this
than I ever knew about Bitcoin before I'd
taken that. And I just was honored to
be a part of it. I just happened
to meet him in Sedona. It was just
fantastic.
And so I invited him on because he
we had this conversation at dinner after the
big event, which just blew my mind, which
a lot of we talk about in the
interview. But I said, here to discuss what
he sees as the true vision, the original
vision of Bitcoin. We discussed whether Bitcoin has
effectively been hijacked or commandeered by power structures
to suit their interest of control as opposed
to what many feel was Bitcoin's original direction,
the de of decentralized interactions between individuals, specifically
peer to peer transactions
without the need for banks or governments, which
is at least how it was laid out.
This has become a very contentious topic in
the world of cryptocurrency as well as for
average people who have justifiable concerns regarding any
digital currency, which anybody should understand right now.
We discussed the concepts of cryptocurrency and blockchain
technology and how they can be used like
any tool, as a weapon, or how to
build something new. And as he sees it,
it's now time to strike that path.
That this the time is running out, he
argues. But well worth your time. I think
it's a fantastic interview.
And it just was included so that was
interesting. Forbes put this out, when was the
2024 in January
2021 or January 21, excuse me, 2024, so
last year. And the point is US government
owns way more Bitcoin than any other country,
so why aren't they selling it? Realize that
was that was January last year, well before
we started this conversation. So this has been
a long sought plan. I mean, there's times
that were at that point, they were even
going after people for stuff. You know? So
it's it's very telling what's been going on.
But it's not about owning it really. It's
about the CPU power, which I think is
more important
and able to, set effectively be able to,
you know, present transparency,
but be able to actually manipulate that while
making you feel like nothing has happened. That's
to make it very simple. I also had
a great interview with Derek going over the
article we recently covered. It's just it's we
had a great conversation about Wise be censoring
him, by the way. Wise has now shut
down his account
for no discernible reason because they just got
flagged and they wouldn't even tell him why.
It's more censorship.
Simple as that. And we talk about the
GMO Mexico conversation that I covered on the
show. It's just it's a makes me very
angry to talk to be honest, it just
kills me what's going on.
Forcing GMO's on other countries when I mean,
the point the simple point,
the majority of GMO corn the US produces
goes is basically forced on Mexico. And they
use most of I mean, all almost all
of it for animal feed. They don't want
it. They're they've literally it's it's like they're
there's a huge movement in Mexico because it's
risking their indigenous corn species, the indigenous culture
populations.
And and now they showed up and said,
we don't want it anymore. And they basically
said, too bad. You signed an agreement. You
have to. And it's like it's just so
funny because they just don't care. And now
they're trying to go through congress to make
these things pass. Because it's not about some
agreement. It's about this is a we know.
This is a ticking time bomb. The the
the
spreading of the of the sea of the
basically, the, what's the word I'm looking for?
The I'm trying to rush.
Cross pollinization of these different scenes. That's what
they're really worried about. They're ruining their their
heirloom, if that's the right word for how
far back that goes.
Corn species. Or is it genus? Species. Anyway,
the point is all the different
indigenous corns they have and and culture that
they have there are being risked by what
they're forcing on them. And it's just hilarious
to me that they just were like, we
don't care. They literally go like, if we
cite the risk to our indigenous population and
the many different scientific studies that show all
bad and they were, like, they call it
vague and and unscientific responses.
It just kills me. And the point is
they if they stoned they aren't able to
force it on Mexico,
that's a huge financial detriment because nobody else
is taking this stuff. It just shows you
how artificial this all is,
and they don't care.
This is the kind of thing that they're
doing, and they don't care. They this is
the
don't by the way, don't miss how this
overlaps with the globalism.
The biotech manipulation, the food supply stuff. This
is a very long term, very long term
manipulation. And this overlaps with going through Trump's
administration too.
Now, one A couple quick points before we
get into the bulk here is I I
just wanna point this out since we just
recently talked about this. Steve Cunningham, thank you
for pointing this out. Mobile's driver's license to
become available in North Carolina
starting this year. Now, it's just just that
what we already knew. It's, it's been going
on. And I, I actually, I might even
have an article. Let me see if that
pops up.
Now,
Let me search for it real quick while
we're talking. I forgot I think I did
a show on this, but at least mentioned
the Biden mobile driver's license point. And it
was like MDL, I think.
But the point was, as you remember,
is that we talked about the SAVE Act
because this this generally relates to a lot
we're talking about today, and you guys are
all very aware of this, I think. But
the point being SAVE Act,
the main point in my mind was to
solidify the real ID compliant identification as one
of the options, One of the only 2
or 3 that were even valid to this
point. Other ones being some that were potentially
paper options. But that was that's digital ID.
That's what that is. That is real ID
compliant. That's digital ID
and ID 2020. Those these are overlapping points
that are literally about driving you in the
digital ID. It's undeniable. And, of course, the
point is during COVID, one of those pre
the one of the people who resigned in
protest because of this. He called it I
think she called it, techno fascism or something
like that. We've talked about it many times.
Point is that this was about solidifying the
Real ID compliant aspect while making it clear,
look, there's other options though, so we're not
forcing. Right? Just like the COVID beginning.
And my point was, at the same time,
from Biden's side of it, you had them
rolling out the MDL, the mobile driver's license
push. And I made this very clear. I
read through all the documentation.
Once this becomes in effect, it will be
a matter of time before they then make
the paper versions null and void.
So that means then,
the paper version, not just in this context
of driver's licenses, but in general, your identification,
as they make clear, you can store no
more than your driver's license on this app.
It'll eventually become your one stop shop for
your identification, probably held on Twitter, by the
way.
And then that invalidates the others. Now that
has a sweeping effect. So now you go
back to the save act. Well, guess what?
Now the other ones in there that says,
boy, this you have real ID compliant and
list of the things, but too bad those
are now no longer valid because we have
this over here. It's very simple how this
always works.
Everyone will point at the other. It's the
Democrats' fault for that. No. It's the Republicans'
fault for passing the bill. At the end
of the day, all that matters is you're
forced to use digital IDs and they point
at each other. Both sides get the luxury
of going, but it was the Democrats that
did it. It was the Republicans that made
it happen. But what's the what's the difference
if it happens anyway? That's the problem with
the partisan mindset. Thank you, Steve, for pointing
this out. It's just a quick little video
that plays it telling you how this is
coming and you're gonna get to use it.
Who I mean, most average people are going
to take this. Because I bet here if
you watch the video, it'll it'll shorten your
time to the DMV. It'll be quicker. You
don't lose your license.
I'm even willing to bet you it'll give
you a longer export you probably won't even
have an expiration date. It'll probably auto updated
for you, which probably then means they'll be
able to manipulate. Now these are all just
off the top of my head. But realize
that most people are gonna go, yeah. Why
not? I mean, look, aside from all the
clear agendas I see around it, I would
I my mind's like, well, yeah, because I've
lost my idea before. Why I would I
might well, might as well just take that
so I have it and then I'll still
use my other one. But I'm not going
to because I see how this surreptitious this
is. Of course, I could be wrong. But
my point is most people are going to
lean into this. How long until it's just
too late? This is what we're all trying
to say right now. I mean, it's just
it's all right on the surface. It's written
on the wall. Make sure you check this
stuff out.
I guess not.
The mobile driver's license, I'm not seeing it
in the oh, well. Well, you got if
you remember what what show that was, shout
it out for me. I'll try to grab
it. Now, let's get into the Twitter aspect
of this.
Like, it's interesting to me how I mean,
even this x a I thing, it's so
funny. Or even, like, the the grok thing.
It's funny how we can be, like, really
ahead of these conversations in a lot of
ways and just how often
because of how stepped on
TLav and a lot of other genuine
objective nonpartisan independent media are just stepped on
suppressed. It just doesn't it's it's interesting to
me. Nonetheless, I was just talking about this
morning. I really don't even care about the
context of or the point of saying I'm
the one other than that suppresses my ability
to reach, grow, and make more money to
be able to continue this work. So, obviously,
that matters. But, nonetheless, the point is that
I I feel good about the fact that
we do certain things,
and then I can see that it cascades
from there.
And then I'm not even saying just me
or the the there's a few the peep
like, boys basically doing something that is not
everywhere. And then all of a sudden, the
next day, you see it circulating everywhere. People
getting a 100,000 views and these things that
and you look back and ours goes 51
shares. You know? Whatever. It's like, well, whatever.
The point is we still had that. We
still made that happen, and I love that.
And I guarantee they know that too. So
if you're part of this audience and you
see the same thing I'm seeing, just recognize
our real objective is not to be like,
we started that. That's not what we're here
for. It's to get the objective done. And
so now that we see certain things happening
and by the way, this is just this
what I have on the screen is not
really related to what I'm saying, so don't
think there's a secret message here. The point
is that ultimately
like, for instance, with the Grok thing or
whatever else. So as I'm gonna get into
this this conversation,
or, here
oh, jeez. We're that far away from it?
Maybe I'm jumping way ahead. This one. The
quiet transition from DARPA's XAI to Elon's XAI.
We talked about that on December 24th. And
even before that, I think a week before
that, we talked about DARPA's XAI and their
connection. And now it's all starting to swing
back around. Why? Because BlackRock put some money
into it.
And it's interesting. My point is that it's
interesting how far ahead we tend to be
on some of these things that even I
even I guarantee partisan people would see if
they were able to see it, which I
probably parsed away from our content would be
like, wow. That's important, but it just doesn't
happen. But it seems so constant.
So just to give a shout out to
our our
wonderful member of our community, Orwell, she says,
good morning, friends. I just think it's hilarious
to me. So it shows Elon sitting at
the at the president desk and Trump behind
him with a mad face and says, when
an immigrant steals your job,
this is just perfect.
I mean, it's my the thing is, I
honestly don't think there I I mean, it's
pretty transparent that this whole Elon is president
thing. Even if there's plenty of reason to
see that there's some validity to what that
might be, the idea that maybe he has
more influence than we realize, maybe he I
mean, I'm not saying I think these are
even that the bottom line is, of course,
it's possible that he, through some other power
structure or just who you know, the real
power structure of what we're dealing with here,
the technocrats and oligarchs,
not the puppeteers and archivists and everything else.
But my point is that there's reasons you
could think that might be the case. I'm
just simply saying that I'm only leaning into
it because it's funny. And ultimately, that I
can clearly see that it's being driven by
partisan elements,
like, just to make Trump mad. And even
though they know that,
it's pretty obvious that it's still bothering. And
I just thought that was funny. It's an
interesting thing to highlight. But just in a
real sense, I mean, it's not that Farfetch
to recognize that as we've all been kind
of highlighting, you know, puppet in chief, the
selection, like, realizing that maybe the person in
that seat isn't actually in charge anyway, and
that maybe that is the case. I mean,
it's worth considering. But just wanna be clear,
it's more of humor that I shared this
because, ultimately, you're seeing this kind of stuff,
which is where I got that image from.
Trump in danger of losing the battle for
MAGA to president Musk, analyst says. I it's
not it's just it's humorous to me. But
the truth is,
you can see that it does bother because
these people are very big on their own
perception of themselves. They have a lot of
hubris.
And I think that it's clear that Musk
is taking center stage in almost every conversation
right now. Like, even around the Trump discussions,
Musk seems to be a central player that
seems to be discussed.
I just think that's interesting. I think that
is almost guaranteed to eventually cause a rift.
Just because of my opinion of who these
people are.
Yes. And it's it's a it's a low
opinion. I I think that shows you that
they're petty, but you can just you can
disagree.
The point of all this is just simply
saying that they're reading the the tea leaves
and they think that Elon is, you know,
it's just funny. But overall,
what we're gonna get into today in general
though should make you at least ask the
question about who's really calling the shots, whether
Elon or Trump or anybody. Because there's a
lot more going on that I think is
important to consider. And that's what I use
that image for to make a kind of
a
not a not only a double entendre in
in the normal sense, but, you know, the
the title being, you know, as
the sent as the free speech facade falls
apart, the technocratic agenda takes center stage, which
is ultimately the point of that image. Because
this is kinda how I read this right
now. You know, that
everything seems to be dismantling in front of
us, and Elon, who seems to be playing
a very central role, he's the the the
public face to make you like what he's
presenting,
or how or however they see it, but
of the technocratic
agenda.
And he does seem to be taking the
center stage in all what we're dealing with
here. So you see what I'm saying? Like,
if I get that sense that it's pretty
clear. Now, what I see Elon doing in
getting into the conversation of Twitter and censorship
and so on, is it's it's the same
thing I see I mean, Alex says the
same thing a lot. Hey. Maybe it's just
a lot of the partisan grifters.
The point is that,
one,
look over there. Right? Let's just tap into
the big buzzword conversations that get most conservatives
to look away from what we're dealing with.
You know? Democrat plot for the inauguration. Look
over there. Look at what the pedophiles are
doing in the UK. You know, whatever. And
even if these things are real conversations,
it's it's almost it's it's jarring how much
he's trying to get you to look away
from what's going on. And and that's not
what I was first starting with is the
is well, they will also,
you know, come out and be like
I've tried like, this one's like, you know,
Jimmy Seville in the UK. He's a pedophile,
and that's what the UK is like. And
that's, you know, like, trying to look over
there look over there, but using people like
Ken O'Keefe.
So Elon shares this
and just, you know, just Ken O'Keefe. And
I simply said, this is like when the
US government celebrates Nelson Mandela, which by the
way, they don't get that. You know, or
any other other examples where the government was
or, like, you know, Martin Luther King, for
example, like, going after them, maybe assassinated them,
which I think we should really understand with
Martin,
MLK junior. That's what happened. That I mean,
look at James Corbett's work. I mean, it's
been testified to. The government was involved. The
bottom line is they still go, yay. What
a hero today, which makes me sick. They
know what they did. They don't they they're
using you and using what you care about.
Same thing here.
So I simply said, ask Ken about his
opinion on your Israel stance, Elon. We'll see
how this works. The point is you you're
projecting it. This is an in different example,
but I'll show you one in a second
from Alex Jones basically saying, you know, I
don't know about this algorithmic change Elon did.
I don't know. It could be a bad
thing. And then goes on to the rest
of the day screening about how Elon's saving
the world. Right? I don't take that seriously.
To me, if you have been consistently
propagandizing
or or ignoring the main point and then
you suddenly make an aver a a point
that's valid, to me, that's the inconsistent of
the consistency. So you need to verify that
you're gonna you know what I mean? Like,
the it's to me, it is about trying
to get you to think that he is
on decide of objectivity, but then goes right
back to screaming he Elon's the best thing
in the world.
That's a ploy.
My point is simply to be show discernment
and don't just go, yes. See. And then
wait for more consistency of being
objective, which does not seem to be the
norm in this case.
Michael simply says, yes. Elon hyper focused
on the what
while demonetizing,
shadow banning, debadging the people who are talking
about the who and the why is insane.
And so, you know, whatever topic you think
he's alluding to, and I'm sure everyone has
a different opinion, it's actually interesting to think
about exactly the way he framed that. It
is interesting. Right? So he he he's hyper
focusing on the what, like, the what about.
Look over there. UK and what they're
doing. While basically shutting down people talking about
the who and the why.
Right? Not just that it's happening, but maybe
why. Who's behind it? Why is it being
driven in front of you? The same thing
as all of these conversations. Right? Al Qaeda
in the United States. Okay. Then who's behind
Al Qaeda? And are those even accurate? Who's
relaying the story? Is the information false? Instead,
focus on the what, like, pointing at the
story. That's what he seems to be doing
while deranking, demonetizing,
shutting down
people who are saying the reality. And this
to me, this has become so transparent.
It's across the board. I think everybody's seeing
this right now. Now we just had our
show on the second, which got a really
big reach. It only got 20,000 views on
Rumble for us, which is pretty pretty good.
5th generation warfare. Drones, fog, false flags, and
political destabilization.
And it guy, this is what I feel
like is happening right now. I mean, honestly,
I think we're all becoming aware of like,
if you don't take time to look into
5th generation warfare or just search that on
TLav's search bar. We've done, I think, 3
shows on this.
It's a very obvious and real time it's
it's it's not new, But this is the
this is where we are. We are immersed
in 5th generation warfare. And, yeah, if you
you have to see that. You have to
understand what that means.
Nothing you're looking at today is going to
be what it appears to be. That doesn't
have to be, like,
as exhausting as it may sound. Just recognizing
that they are their everything is being manipulated.
And guys, if you wanna be clear about
it, it's been that way for a very
long time. But it's about the groups you're
seeing, about the shows you're watching, about the
narratives being constructed, about the circles and the
political the mainstream
media, the the Al Qaeda group running Syria,
the Azov movement. These are all pockets of
the same conversation because they are not what
they appear to be. But it gets much
much much more cray much crazier than that
when you get into
the neuroscience
side of it, the nanotechnology
side of it, or just the psychological operation
side of it. So I just want you
guys to think about that and what we're
all dealing with. And and and not just
choose to see one side of it as
am am, you know, and,
altruistic
all the time. Recognize that even if you
think that, even if they think that, they
could be played. They could be part of
it and not even know it. But I
don't think that's the case. Check out this
show, though. I thought it was a really
good one.
Now, on that note,
you probably all saw this. That is my
point. On 4th, pretty early in this conversation,
we shared out the
the grok thing. I did a I did
a video on it, posted on Twitter, which
I rarely do.
And this was about his algorithm tweak. And
I went through and I did exactly what
everyone's showing screenshots of, where I bring up
the grok thing, which I rarely do. I
ask it specific questions about me and what
I would have to do to violate the
negativity aspect. It's 14 minutes. I'll go through
my points in a second.
My point though is interesting is, you know,
this was on noon on 4th. And then,
you know, later later that day and then
all through today, it's been populating everywhere. I'm
by far I don't think by far
I've seen others, you know, at least an
hour before. I'm not the first one to
do that. My point though is I only
did this
because I saw somebody
comment underneath me and share a screenshot
of of an idea around this, and I
took time to do it myself. My point
is that this is out there circulating and
it's interesting how little engagement it gets despite
being a really important thing that 300 follower
accounts will make a clip about with a
screenshot and I've already got 10, you know,
10,000. You see, it's it's very channeled. My
point though is even saying this is not
about complaining. It's that I think a lot
of people right now, especially on the conservative
side, are finally starting to see this, to
see how
how
sinister it is, surreptitious. Like, it's not about
anything other than, like like, we're being experimented
on, but also controlling conversations.
It's very it's weird, man. So the point,
if you don't see if you haven't seen
it, he came out on the 3rd and
said, algorithm tweak coming soon. Of course, this
is all on the on the tail of
all that's been going on. Him getting caught
14 times over, censoring people, lashing out, demonetizing,
Like, just I mean, the whole Groiper thing
is the one they can't hide from, which
I'll show you a clip out in a
minute. It was there's, like, 15 different accounts
they just deleted.
Many of them small, many of them unverified,
and no one's cared about that because, I
mean, like, you peep in general, people have
a pretty bad opinion of them. And so
becomes, well, well, we all know they're well,
it doesn't change the fact that they're censored,
guys. That's free speech for you. They can
be screaming Nazi
Sieg Heil nonsense and they should have the
right to say what they want. I'll call
them disgusting.
I'll say I disagree with your opinions, but
they have a right to do what they
want and say what they want.
Especially on a platform that professes to be
free speech, right?
So the point is after all of that,
he came out and said tweet coming soon,
which by the way is the second one.
They did one earlier, same point was made.
But this one,
and, of course, the algorithm one before was
about
if many if if large accounts got together
and basically all
gave you negative engagement, that that would radically
down bank your all all it was was
mob engagement. Right? It's this idea of conformity
was what they were driving under the guise
of free speech. Now it gets worse.
Algorithm tweet coming soon to promote more informational
entertainment content.
Informational slash entertaining content.
We will publish the changes to engineering. Which
I guarantee is not the full picture. It
never is. Our goal is to maximize unregretted
user seconds. Too much negativity is being published,
pushed. Even though the whole joke point is
even people who support him are like, dude,
that was you. You were the one doing
this. And now, again, today, as he's screaming
about all sorts of things that otherwise we
would get censored for
or at least down ranked.
What do you mean by negativity? Right? Well,
this is where the whole grok thing comes
into play, where you actually ask it. And
if, I forgot oh, I didn't grab the
tweet today. I shouted them out in the
last show. The person who showed it to
me first, I always think it's important to
give people credit for with event, you know,
just for even sharing something with you. And
the point was, they simply said, look, if
you ask grok, it'll tell
you. And so I I said, okay. That's
interesting.
So I went in,
and I asked using his model. Oh, it's
right there actually. There. It's symb symbiont. Thank
you for sharing that. And simply said, give
examples from my post. Now here's what's really
important as I'm gonna make this again with
Alex trying to defend Elon and Grok right
now,
which is that Grok is an artificial intelligence.
And I'm gonna get I'm trust I'm gonna
get in today a little bit deeper to
this conversation about what XAI actually is. It
is DARPA's program. This is an XAI explainable
in artificial intelligence program, which don't again, that's
this right here, by the way. Oh, you
know what? That's interesting.
I just see it happened to me too.
We're gonna get to a point in a
second that I'm jumping ahead a little bit.
Okay. Look.
Here's Elon Musk.
Notice how it has an XAI right there
that says explain this post? That's literally DARPA's
program that supposedly end in 2021. And then
months later, Elon oops. Elon buys Twitter, turns
it into x, and
just randomly starts decides to start an artificial
intelligence program called XAI and using social media
to train it, which they're not even hiding,
which is exactly what DARPA was doing. But
now they're using it to decide whether you
have mental illness, to use digital twins with
Meta, and, yeah, that's totally not the dangerous
thing that they were doing to Great Reset.
No. Not at all. The point is either
way, it's DARPA. It's government. That's during Biden's
administration,
x AI.
We're gonna get to that more in a
second. My point is check it out how
it's right there on Elon's post. And remember
I just showed you, it was even on
mine. Right? I was doing it just the
other day. Check this out.
What happened?
Where is it? It's gone. Why don't I
have it? Why don't why don't other people
have it or talking about Israel?
I that's pretty interesting. Now maybe it's just
a glitch. Maybe it's only today. Maybe it's
just this random post. I don't know. But
I find it interesting. Here's Greg Marbury. There
it is right there.
We'll come back to this. I didn't mean
to jump into this now. It just it
was interesting to me. Let me just do
one thing. Look at another tweet I have.
Yeah. It's gone, guys. That's not there. So
now is explainable AI. Do you know why
I think that's interesting? Because, I mean, you
could still try to use it here. My
point is that you can click it and
it says explain this post. So if it's
something they don't want you to explain or
think about,
I guess it's being selectively given or allowed
or whatever. Now this isn't something we're all
asking for, but me, especially, I'm going give
it I'm good. I don't want it. But
I still find that interesting. Now I'll get
more into that second. Now the point though
where was that? I go back too far?
No. It's right there.
Where were we? Right there. Now the point
is that you could ask Grok
about right there.
About excuse me.
About what he provided. Basically saying, okay. So
what in my posts meet the requirements of
Grok? Now remember what I was gonna what
I was saying there is Grok is an
AI created by Elon's company and himself,
and the only data input it has is
from them. Okay? So when you're asking Grok
and for information, it's not just pulling this
out of nowhere, it's using what they have
given it to access.
So if if, and I made this point
the last show I had. I said, and
Grok could be wrong, right, for all those
that are pretty much pretending like we're just
assuming whatever. The point is that, of course,
Grott could be wrong. It could be that's
just objective.
But a lot of partisans refuse to engage
with.
My point, though, nonetheless, is that even if
it's wrong, it's wrong because of the information
they gave it. So at the very least,
what it gives you right now, of course,
that's valid to talk about. Of course, that's
valid to then use in con in if
it contradicts what they're putting forward or it
shows you something that is not free speech.
So I simply asked like they demonstrated,
what are examples
in my posts based on the information provided,
and typical content from TLav, here are hypothetical
examples of posts that might be considered to
have too much negativity.
According to Elon's criteria
for promoting positivity and reducing negativity.
So it's this is Crock literally telling you
based on Elon's criteria for this exact conversation,
and
one of them says that these are hypothetical
posts. It says the government continues to suppress
information about the true extent of surveillance.
It's blatant violations of our privacy rights. Surveillance
state surveillance state privacy is dead. That's literally
what they're telling you would be considered a
post that is too negative
that would downrate your content.
So basically, talking bad about the government, which
is exactly what, what Texas 1 said, your
account will now be punished if you try
to hold elected officials accountable. Well, maybe just
the ones they like though. That's how dumb
this is getting and how transparent it is.
As Elon does things for his own interests
or what he wants or because he's angry
that day. And this is not about a
personal thing, guys. It's some it's conservatives are
calling this out. So we just have to
recognize how silly that is.
The other one, I think it was before
or was it after? Okay. That's right. I
went into this before an accident. So the
other one's interesting to me.
It
says
Right there. Now, this is fascinating. So I
The first one I asked it,
trying to get the shot on it. Sorry.
Right there. So the first one I asked
it was about myself.
And he can't take he can't see it.
Basically saying examples, maybe I can play it
real quick.
Well, okay. So it you heard it right.
They're basically saying maybe you didn't. It's basically
asking, give examples from g love posts about
what we were just asking. Right? And then
it goes on to say, promoting information sharing
in a post from TLav on June 30th.
TLav
encourages readers to share information to help others
become more informed citizens of the world, emphasizing
the importance of spreading awareness. This can be
seen as aligning with Elon Musk's goal of
promoting more informational content. That's interesting. How about
this one? Question everything. Says TLab's Substack associated
with TLab promotes a culture of questioning everything,
which could be seen as an approach to
reduce negativity.
What's hilarious to me is that literally what
Grok is deciding is, like, every it's there's,
like, 6 bullet points. Everything about me meets
exactly what Musk has inputted to Grok to
meet the requirements for what he's asking for.
But weirdly enough,
gee, I wonder why,
I'm being suppressed anyway.
I think that's super important. Now
Greg Murberry said, although I never harbored any
illusions about Muskie's much touted free speech bona
fides is, this is beyond the pale. What
what Fauci's nonsense bloke keep, or
blow be clearly getting high on his own
supply, and I ain't talking about ketamine. The
brand is becoming increasingly shop soiled.
Interesting.
So
the censorship reality is undeniable. Okay? And now
he's tweaking the algorithm to basically down rank
information that they subjectively decide is negative.
Now, guys, realize this is no different than
anything else. We're just in a different time
frame. There's different focal points. There's different information.
This is the same damn thing
run by a conservative. So you feel any
slant certain way based on certain errors. At
the end of the day, it's the same
outcome.
I don't know why I I just don't
get why average people are not I mean,
I well, I take it back because right
now, that is happening. Right now, we are
seeing a cascading of people,
conservatives, that are going there's this is wrong.
What's happening is obvious. And I'm gonna go
into a couple of large examples of huge
accounts that are saying this is bad
while the same usual suspects are screaming the
opposite. This is gonna save everybody. I'm sure
you can guess who. We'll get to it
in a second.
Now same
point. David Icke says, are you getting get
getting it yet? Musk's free speech x was
always a trap,
and now it's being sprung. First, he targets
those that disagree with him, and now he's
punishing negativity, which is another way of saying
censorship,
as he deboots those that expose him to
Trump.
That's negativity,
you see, because you are not worshiping the
gods who are shafting you. Meanwhile, it's this
this fraud can post what he likes every
few minutes.
And the point is in in ways that
are just as subjective or contentious or whatever
else,
doesn't change that though. So I don't think
this is even about negativity or anything else.
It's about creating a justification
to suppress content.
And as Carrie comes in and in her
wonderful way and says, I'm feeling very positive
about how how how many Magas are going
to realize that they were duped again and
start questioning government authority beyond theatrical 2 party
divisions. Beautiful.
You get what she's doing. And to hit
this person says, yeah. If they were that
fooled by Trump, they would be fooled again
by someone else. Because not not getting what
she's trying to do. But I I agree
with what he's saying. Different brand maybe. Fools
are gonna be fooled. They insist on it.
She goes, I'm sorry. Only positive and beautiful
content is allowed here.
It's just it's just ridiculous, guys. It's silly.
And I love people like Carrie who are
just it makes me remember that there are
good people out there. That objective, honest, critically
thinking people that are not swayed by ridiculously
obvious psyops.
Now same point, Elon coming out and saying
algorithm tweak. Now I referenced this guy's tweet
in my little thread I did over there.
Oh, actually, you know what? No. I'll leave
it alone. I I went over a couple
of things in there, but I'll I think
I'll get to the CIA point in a
second.
So he says in response, mister Musk, it's
your platform. If you wanna run it into
turn it into silly cat videos and pharma
commercial people, blissfully running through summit fields, that's
your prerogative. But that's not what the market
of ideas is. That's certainly not what we
are the news is. Now, see, this isn't
a this isn't a person with integrity.
Not afraid to go, that's not what you
promised.
Even though you read the chat, he's getting
kicked back from all these conservatives going, you're
fighting the group. You're bringing us you know,
whatever. That's bad for Trump. You shouldn't say
that. Just ridiculous.
It's true though. Doesn't that matter to people
professing free speech and truth? I mean, it's
just it's so there's such an oxymoron. It's
such a weird contradiction everywhere you look for
those that don't wanna acknowledge what he's showing
you while screening that he's doing what he's
not doing.
It's wild.
But he goes on to say, but that's,
you know, that's your prerogative. He says that
how about just letting people post the content
they want? I know. It's shocking. Right? And
read, respond, interact with the content they want.
And let the chips fall where they may.
We aren't children.
We don't need to be coddled. And speaking
for me, he says, I'll I guarantee I'll
regret wasting time watching stupid cat videos a
lot more than I will regret fighting to
save my country.
Now what's interesting about it is you could
read you don't who knows for sure the
intent? But I think it's interesting to think
about the obvious,
what's the right word for it? You know,
did they acquiesce to the GARM to government
demands? Their own lawsuit made that clear. Over
90% of what they asked, they've already complied
with. Garm, they already said they met or
exceeded all of what they were requiring,
and they partnered with them in July despite
the disbanding as
Ben showed
still going.
So my point is that they're clearly tapped
into the mainstream of all this despite pretending
otherwise.
So So what the what's interesting is you
could argue that they know that if they
allow free speech, actually,
well, then you know what you're gonna see.
The truth will be sussed out. People will
be calling out exactly what we're doing, what
we're highlighting.
Not we don't make it I could be
wrong. What what whatever the truth is, the
uncomfortable truth would come to pass, would come
to be revealed.
And I think that's about what Israel's doing.
I think that's about the reality of who
they are. I think that's and they can't
allow that. So they have to cultivate it.
On top of that, they wanna pretend, like,
look at these other platforms. Like, you know,
a real free speech platform like BitShoot.
Look at those platforms. Look at how gross
it is. Look at all the racist comments.
And I think that's being engineered, quite frankly.
But either way, well, so all you're saying
is that we don't actually want free speech.
Let's just say that is the full picture.
Well, that's what free speech looks like. Those
people exist.
So all you're really highlighting is that you
actually don't believe in free speech.
This gets the point. Let the chips fall
where they may. Isn't that the point?
No. Not for them.
Now he follows up and says, I've just
unfollowed Musk.
Let me see if this is the oh,
here's here's a different one.
But first, he says, I've made a decision,
and I may regret it because I'm sure
it's going to cost me a lot of
content from people from a lot of people
I enjoyed and admire, but right is right.
See, that's integrity, guys.
Because he's saying me saying this is gonna
lose me connections. Why? Because he's saying what
they don't like. That's petty. That's small. Even
my even if I aggressively disagree with you,
I'm not gonna just excommunicate somebody because they
think something different. That's thought control. That is
I mean, what? A purity test? To use
the words being being used against us at
the beginning of this. It says, I'm unfollowing
any content that limits their replies to verified
only and muting blocking selected ones. It says,
whatever your thoughts on this, it says little
voices deserve to be heard just as much
as big voices. Those who participate in the
profit portion of x do not deserve any
more of a voice in the marketplace of
ideas. See, this is what they pretended they
were doing.
Honest people can see through it right now.
He says, then those who do not. This
is a free speech zone
where all people are supposed to be able
to come and be heard. That's not what
it is, but that's what he wanted it
to be. Limiting that in the this way
is simply wrong on every possible level. So,
of course, I mean, it's not even that
now, by the way, guys. That's the thing.
So even see,
honest people, there's a lot of good people
that just get played by what they want
to see in these people, like Elon and
the rest. But he goes, I've unfollowed Elon
Musk. That's what he says. I've just unfollowed
him. I love the guy. I'm an ultimate
Elon fanboy, but the decision to limit replies
to only premium users is wrong on every
level, and I won't support it.
Right? So that's another aspect of it, by
the way. All these different weird you know,
being able to mute certain words, getting rid
of hashtags. Like, this is such a transparent
effort to create conformity under a guise of
free speech.
And you are being engineered. I don't know
why people can't see it.
Now a lot of people who have been
kind of embarrassingly going along with a lot
of this stuff, and not even necessarily a
person on the screen, but a lot of
the parts and elements are suddenly now turning
this turning a page. But in this this
one from leave a phrase, a very weird
way to to do this.
Now
it says it it's almost like
why can't you just come out and be
like, this is bad and wrong, and we
all know it. Right? But he says, I
thought the discussion about, quote, positive positivity score
algorithmic boosting on x to minimize regretted user
minutes was a joke. It's not. Now why
would you assume that? Right? See, this is
the game of trolling. Right? So you never
really know for sure. Like, what about tomorrow?
He comes out and goes, just kidding. It
was all a big troll.
How would we know it was or wasn't?
Maybe he did that because he now wants
to pull back on it because he lost
control of it. That it's it's a well
executed tactic, but, see, that's the game. It's
always not sure. It's always up in the
air. You can pull that card anytime you
want. But he goes, fantastic. Let me be
the first to say it's a great idea.
What better way to enhance a so called
free speech solo social media platform than by
implementing an opaque Kamala Harris esque joyful warrior
big brother techno nanny state algorithm to curate
platform to enjoy into joy and positivity.
Man,
here's what's crazy to me. First of all,
Kamala Harris esque. Like, these people are so
blinded by their partisan per se. It's the
same thing.
It's the same what's Kamala Harris of all
people? Like, there's so many other examples on
left and right that are just so funny
because that's the last focal point. Well, my
point though, the big brother techno nanny state
algorithm.
Are these people aren't paying attention? This is
literally being built by the people who you
are supporting.
Not because of some new algorithmic change on
Twitter, but that and everything else that
the entire administration is supporting.
I just don't get this blind spot. But
the point is that even in some kind
of snide, like, I pretend to support it
while sat while while outlining why it's bad,
why you're still calling it out. It's not
just this one point, though.
It says, what's even better?
Considering we are the media now on x
and that the most important news, unfortunately, tends
to be negative, upsetting, concerning, I'm sure Elon's
joyful warrior algorithmic tweak will further facilitate the
free flow of accurate timely breaking news. Oh,
so in a way confusing way, you're saying
this will suppress important information.
Why can't you just say that?
It's the most gracious thing for the owner
of a free speech platform to do, to
algorithmically micromanage the free speech platform to ensure
that its users do not have regret in
their daily lives. True, but Evelyn's is protecting
people from the consequences of their own free
will. You get it? Right? He's saying this
is bad.
If only Elon could craft an off platform
exercise and dietary algorithm for those out there
you get where he's going with this. He's
trying to act like they are trying to
control your lives, guys. This was transparently
obvious well before this algorithm. But I'm glad,
regardless, that it's waking people up. We'll see,
though, whether this is like many others that
go bad bad bad then go right back
to supporting the agenda. But it says, I
for 1 like thank Elon for unilaterally taking
on the parental role of what they're doing.
He goes, I sure hope Elon doesn't walk
this back this this decision back, which is
my point. If he does and says to
troll, everybody would go along with that. I'm
sure if he decided not to implement the
new algorithm, people would drop their paid subscriptions
out of protest.
Like, almost meant to be like a sec
backhanded, like, we'll do that if you don't.
Like, this is so strange to me.
But it's coming out everywhere. Now, again, this
is not to say I support any one
of these people or believe in their ideas
or whatever else. But the point is that
people that are in other cases who are
very supportive of Elon are now calling him
out.
Myron Gaines says, I speak for people, Elon.
For the people. I don't know why he
would think he can say that, but he
says, here is why everyone has lost their
trust in you. You took over this app
promising freedom of speech on the basis of
it being a bedrock of democracy. Funny how
quickly this has changed. Right? And framed it
as per the first amendment of the constitution.
Yeah. Why? Because he knew what you wanted
to hear. That's why. People cheered and loved
you. Again, people cheered and loved you at
that moment because they were willing to go
along with nice sounding words without waiting for
an outcome.
Now look, you can cheer and love whoever
you want. You don't have to allow your
emotions to be bound by what you can
prove. But, you know, the point is, in
this conversation, we know what this is really
about. So those that then were like, he's
gonna save free speech before we ever saw
it,
that's that's a problem for me. Us I
know. Again, in the context of people covering
this in a news matter, which they were
everywhere.
Alex Jones is doing it every day. Saving
free speech. So my point is,
now that we can literally see, even though
I think we could then,
why were people cheering it on before we
ever saw an outcome? The same reason people
are currently cheering on, how, j apparently, Trump
has already changed the country before he's even
gotten into power. Or all these things. We
can't wait for January 20th. Why? Because of
words,
promises.
How often does that play out in politics?
Even if you believe in the person, even
if they mean them,
that's the propaganda. Even if they genuinely mean
it, people who want a benefit from following
along, chasing the coattails
will praise and push
because it feels good.
We all wanted to believe, even myself.
Didn't happen though. And even then, maybe he
will tomorrow, and I'll still cheer it on
tomorrow. But then we wouldn't be able to
forget that he did this first. Right? It's
just being objective and not blinding yourself. But
it says, you posted memes saying how Twitter
is superior to Meta and YouTube,
and you allow free speech.
People cheered and loved you more. Again, same
point. Finally, a billionaire gets it. That's pretty
sad.
You then join and by the way, look.
This is funny. The point is that there's
no reason we should trust people in any
context. They're just tapped into the structure they
claim to be fighting. That's not to say
that there's not somebody with a $1,000,000,000 out
there that might want to do the right
thing. We shouldn't disregard that possibility either. But
my point is that more than anybody, we
should be skeptical of everybody in that position.
When it says, you then joined MAGA to
help us put Trump back in office.
Is that what he did? That seems like
a you know, just even my right assumption
framed as objectivity.
The people cheered and loved even more. Then
MAGA loyalists had a simple disagreement with you
on h one b visas. Now to be
clear, there were already obvious examples before that.
Plenty of people that were MAGA or pro
Trump who were willing to be honest about
Israel, and they immediately got sidelined. They got
boxed out. They got censored. We talked about
it, but these kind of people didn't care
because they didn't like Palestine, so they ignored
it. Right? That's the thing. And then the
h one visa visa h one b visa
conversation
overlapped with an uncomfortable point of that, which
was that they had been fanning a lot
of the most racist elements of the conversation.
And that's not to say that the h
one b visa conversation is inherently racist, but
you can see how that overlaps.
And those people then were like, no. You
what you were telling us, they're all bad.
Muslims and Islam are bad. And the problem
is that they don't actually think that, or
at the very least, they didn't want that
to be public. And so it got problematic.
But he's right, though. Regardless of the point,
they started cracking down on people who just
didn't agree.
You let your emotions destroy your beautiful town
square, which didn't exist even then, by the
way. You worked for years to build. See,
even this is based on the premise that
he's a good guy fighting for the right
thing and just had a bad moment,
just lost his cool.
Why? You don't know him, Myron. You don't
know what he wants to do. You don't
know his intent.
Show better discernment.
And it says you went on a suspension
spree of the Groypers, who, by the way,
most are still censored, who have all individual
unique accounts with massive followings that don't spam.
Hell, he says, they even have a legit
LLC to represent their company. Everything was by
the book, yet they were silenced.
You then went on to de verify or
insult several accounts that disagree with you on
immigration in Israel.
List them off here.
Like, for example, Jake Shields
lost his
I I you know, and the point is
that it's because he's very, very about going
after Israel. But it's a say again,
other lot I don't agree with on Jake.
I think I question a lot of things.
Doesn't mean I would argue they should be
censored.
Absolute free speech,
erring on the side of your principles, guys.
Saying freedom of speech isn't freedom of freedom
of reach or freedom of speech doesn't mean
paid speech. It's exactly
how all the other platforms began their censorship
regimes. Yep.
It's amazing. We can't remember that. The very
same platforms you rallied against for years. Right?
As and on that day, he's like, look
at YouTube censoring around the thing I want
you to talk about. Look over there, the
UK and everything else. That's already started.
Taking away someone's monetization subscribers and reach is
censorship
and antithetical to free speech. Especially since those
those people are paying
for their content.
That's very different. That's a whole another level.
We've talked about this. And this is why?
Because you create a chilling effect, which by
definition makes others scared to speak up and
exercise their free speech that you promised.
Anybody honest is being able to see this
right now. And that also shows you a
very alarming vein, much larger than I think
we realize, of people who may even really
want to expose the truth, but will not
if they think Elon will get mad at
them.
To me, I'll lose all respect for that.
I mean, I don't care whether you think
you're doing right in other context or not.
You pulled your punch where it mattered most.
That, I can't side with.
And it says, this is censorship.
Means speech means nothing if it can't reach
the town square in the first place. It
is enough to just it is not enough
to just allow the speech, which by the
way, they don't have the right to or
the point is, it's not about allowing it
or not. You have that inherent right. He's
just not respecting that
right. But it says you need to be
able to allow all ideas to flow and
then and let the cream rise to the
top. Now that's just an actual free market
to be able to say of ideas, where
people say what they want. The engagement matters.
Now, yes, you can then have that gamed,
which that's supposed to be their job on
the back end, to stop, you know, getting
rid of the bot farms, even though they're
working with Israeli bot farms, which is the
whole point, guys.
But the idea would be that they if
you actually had a free market where they
did their best to get rid of the
bot and and gaming of the background,
then the real ideas that were most popular,
even if they were false, mind you, would
just rise to the top. But then that
would cause a real an
actual square where we could step in and
go, but wait, here's how it's wrong. And
then that, because it was organic, would eventually
take over. That's what's supposed to happen.
And my point is that unless you have
a gained aspect of it, I would argue
and then again, as it comes down to,
like, a philosophical point on what you think
is more likely in our society,
I would argue that more people genuinely want
the truth and want the good thing than
the people just out there to screw around
or to get a kick out of trolling
you. That's the that is the engineered part
of this. That they then have power through
Elon bot farms or Israeli bot farms in
the same way. That's my opinion.
But I think I think there's plenty of
examples to prove
that. It says, you said yourself when this
you said this yourself when you unbanned Nick
Fuentes, who, by the way, is the kind
of leader of that whole group that he
just basically blacklisted.
You said community notes will curb and stop
this information despite that being gained in the
same way. We've already seen it play out.
Allow complete free speech, stick to your word,
and refine community notes to tackle this information.
This I mean, think about what if he
just did all that right now? At least
said he did.
These people would go, yay.
And and why? He just showed you who
he is.
And not in one fleeting moment, but over
and over and over. This is not do
it back the other way. We should be
like, it's over. You are not who you
kind you were. We need something else, but
that's not gonna happen.
This is how you will regain the people's
trust. People want you to like you, Elon,
I guess. Just do the right thing. I
think this weird hero worship kind of idea,
guys. Why what who cares whether you like
him or not? You don't know him. This
is this is a baseball card. This is
some guy on a TV. This is a
actor on a show. You don't know who
he is or what he wants. You know
what he wants you to think. It's like
with social media platforms. Do you think people
always put out who they really are? Most
people put out what they want you to
think they are, or rather what they want
themselves to be. Still, not the real picture.
It just blows my mind that we we
we like you. You guys don't even know
him.
Now, again, I don't know Myra. Maybe he's
super influential and has, you know, his phone
number. I my point is overall,
that's ridiculous. And it says, just do the
right thing first. Yes, please. Retweet and share
this if you like. Make x free speech
great again. And this was when Race chimed
in and said, this is why I started
BitShoot.
Free speech should truly mean speech. That includes
freedom of reach. On BitShoot, you'll never can't
you're never canceled, censored, deplatformed, demonetized.
All ideas and speech are welcome and free
to be shared. Period. Join us.
Morton. Now don't forget, I'll include this. Here's
APAC tracker back back in
August 7, 2024. In another way, Grok was
momentarily showing you the reality when they reached
out to me and said, check this out.
And a lot of other people are doing
this this day, and nobody even came close
to 60 different tags on their account. Places
I saw. All 4 pages of censorship
flags for TLabs account. Now we're we're seeing
that now even with the new algorithm the
gap algorithmic aspect. I I just wanna rehighlight
the reality that this is what's always been
going on. Well before the current conversation.
Censorship.
And it's most obvious form. Really, I shouldn't
say obvious. Most well, now that we see
it, yes. But algorithmic
behind the scenes style, which has always been
there, but today it's on steroids.
Now here's chief Trumpster.
He's doing it himself.
So somebody who is clearly
887,000
followers. Right? Trump Trump supporter.
But good on him for having the courage
to call it out. And he says make
the most negative post regarding x censorship to
decrease my social credit score on x. And
then it simply says, x so called free
speech is a sham. They censor conservative voices
while letting you
letting woke propaganda flourish. It's clear Elon only
cares about profit. Okay.
So what if even if it's wrong, that's
what if that's your real opinion?
You're now now you'll be
decreased. At least according to grok, which as
I said before, could very well be wrong.
But the point is obvious that grok is
only outputting information based on the in the
data points given to it by Elon and
the rest.
To me, that seems pretty often. And, guys,
obviously, if if high level conservatives are highlighting
this, you know this is it's it's not
something to be dismissed.
Now James Lee
makes an excellent point.
I'll show that next. He says,
I wonder who's been in Elon's ear pushing
these new algorithmic changes on x.
This is AFO's Musk changing algorithm and algorithm
to algorithm.
Algorithm to punish negativity.
So this is a clip he shares. I'll
give you the full clip actually of Alan
Greenblatt
telling you they work with Twitter. And by
the way, this is it's this was a
little bit older, but it's not up for
debate. Yacarino and
Elon have been public about their partnership with
the ADL.
It's amazing how many conservatives are on, I
guess, afraid to really call out what that
shows you. Let me show you somebody who
has the courage to call it out. Here's
what I and by the way, I had
a great interview with James Lee about this
exact topic. He had a 24 minute documentary.
It was called the nay the true nature
of the ADL and how it spies on
Americans for Israel.
It's a great documentary. Only 24 minutes worth
your time. So let me play you a
couple clips from that and this actual this
is in it so you can see it
for yourself.
Is
an Israeli spy organization
masking around as a supposed civil rights group
and doing real harm to the Jewish community
writ large in order to run cover for
the state of Israel. So have the power
to monitor social media activity across all major
platforms and change social media algorithms the way
they see fit. Don't believe me? Well, here's
Jonathan Greenblatt, the CEO of the ADL.
So please, hopefully, you just digested what he
said. Now he's gonna show you the clip
of what was in the other clip of
Greenblatt saying that. But just hear what he
said again
while we're literally watching this. Actually, here. Now
that this is actually where this other tweet
comes into play.
Just somebody made a little meme or a
little graph down here. John Green Greenblatt down
here on 2023.
Or, actually, this this is earlier.
Introducing Twitter's new CEO.
It's it's,
Jonathan Green Musk. Or whatever you wanna call
it. So Jonathan Greenblatt in April 5, 2022
says, this isn't hard. Freedom of speech doesn't
mean freedom of reach. In fact, though, it
does. Exactly. It literally means that. As Sam
Husseini in our interview made clear, it is
historical precedent, legal precedent, that freedom of speech
reach is part of freedom of speech. They're
the same thing. Those 2 that you you
take 1, it's not freedom of speech. Period.
They know that. They're just trying to play
a game and manipulate you with words.
But then Elon,
on November of that year so April, Greenblatt
says that. November, same year, he comes out,
goes new policy. Freedom of speech, but not
freedom of reach. After Yaccarino
joins the e World Economic Forum, and they
partner with the EDL, and what do you
know?
It's really that simple.
And down here is this tweet in 2023.
I had a very frank and productive conversation
with La Yacarino yesterday about Twitter. That works
and what doesn't and where it needs to
go to address hate effectively on the platform.
I appreciate her reaching out, and I'm hopeful
the service will improve.
Does it need to be improved?
When it what he what by improve, he
means censored more. He says, ADL will be
vigilant and give her and Elon Musk credit
if service gets better and reserve the right
to call them out if it doesn't. So
a threat, basically.
This is crazy to me. Just how transparent
that is.
So back to the clip,
algorithmic changes. Right? This is what we're dealing
with right now. Right? You work with the
forms and change social social media activity across.
They also have the power to monitor social
media activity across all major platforms and change
social media algorithms the way they see fit.
Don't believe me? Well, here's Jonathan Greenblatt, the
CEO of the ADL. We work with YouTube
to have we to get them to change
their algorithms.
We work with Facebook on trying to use
a redirect method. So when you search for
holocaust, you get directed to, like, a Yad
Vashem
page. We opened
a center in Silicon Valley back in 2017.
And the woman who runs it, she's the
next Facebook executive.
I have software engineers and data scientists working
at ADL.
We're monitoring
all this stuff, and we're working with all
the platforms, by the way. Google and YouTube
and Meta and Twitter and Reddit and Steam
and Amazon, all these companies. From, like, Apple
to Zoom, we work with all of them.
Some might call that a conspiracy fact.
Just saying. And if their ability to influence
big tech and media isn't disturbing enough,
the ADL also partners with payment platforms like
PayPal to monitor online transactions
and cancel payment processing for those whose speech
they disapprove of. Just to understand this, is
this simply a research effort or is the
ultimate goal, I imagine, to effectively defund them,
which is to say that PayPal would effectively
turn off the spigot
or at least turn off the ability for
them to fundraise
using PayPal?
That's correct, Andrew.
Very, very clear.
One more time. Have the power to monitor
social media activity across all major platforms and
change social media algorithms the way they see
fit. Don't believe me? Well, here's Jonathan Greenblatt,
the CEO of the ADL. We work with
YouTube to have we to get them to
change their algorithms. We work with Facebook on
trying to use a redirect method. So when
you search for holocaust, you get directed to,
like, a Yad Vashem
page.
We opened
a center in Silicon Valley back in 2017.
And the woman who runs it, she's next
Facebook executive.
I have software engineers and data Alright. I
just wanted to post something real quick.
It I I just thought it was a
good idea to post that clip with his
interview to get that out there. I'll show
I'll include that for you right now.
To me to me, it's it's wild, isn't
it? Like, how they're literally telling you about
altering algorithms or how how that's what they
can get these platforms to do and how
we're literally watching that play out. You know,
it's just not it's not that difficult to
piece this together. Shout out to James Lee.
He's doing good work. There's the interview itself.
And, oh, and I showed you that basically
the timing of it. Very, very, very revealing.
Now,
here is some of the other kind of
responses you're getting.
Mel does the same thing later in the
day on January 4th after it's been posted.
LOL asking grok how to avoid tripping the
negativity sensors.
Now again, grok could be wrong, but everyone's
getting pretty consistent results based on the input
that they gave it. And it says, don't
criticize your government. Don't criticize foreign governments. Don't
talk about conspiracy theories. Stop telling people to
f off in the comments. And don't accuse
government officials or members of the media of
malfeasance or dishonesty.
Fantastic.
Right before they take power, they wanna suppress
government criticism. How funny that works out.
And
she then goes on to say, doesn't seem
to be a joke, by the way. It's
less I'm missing something.
Of course, I won't be doing any of
this. I just thought it was pretty funny.
What?
So
this is a 100,000 follower account, which is,
you know, you can look at the content.
They're engaging with media and stuff, and it's
like, but you're not gonna criticize the government
or question anything about Twitter. That seems a
little bit interesting. But that's my point though,
is people are like, you know, almost like
they're in a hostage video. They're like, I
won't do any of that though. I promise
I won't be doing that. You know, it's
like, everyone's like, don't censor me, Elon. Like,
that's what we just talked about. Or they
just are willing to self censor. I find
that to be crazy.
But here,
Alex Jones investigates.
Elon Musk's plan to implement algorithmic curation of
negative posts.
Now what's funny about this is that's what
this is one one one I was talking
about. This is actually just how the video
starts, by the way.
He
in other post, we'll show you or, you
know, very much doing just what I was
highlighting earlier. But this this is you actually
this this is just kinda the same point
though. Like, we investigate it. Like, we're critical
of it. Right? But that's not what the
video does. Watch it for yourself if you
wanna go through it. As this person goes,
Ryle O'L. Right? People just don't get it.
Stopping negative posts just means he isn't letting
people do obvious half truths or parade fake
news anymore.
Is that what he's doing? He says he's
dedicated to the truth and stopping nasty impolite
interactions from occurring. Like being openly nasty to
others. Yeah. Because that's totally not the censorship
anti free speech tactic to go, you can't
be mean to me.
So should you
stop nasty impolite interactions? The point is if
you watch this, that's what you end up
getting. That's the sentiment. Like, right? He's just
trying to do the right thing. Because this
is all Elon's trying to save us, and
this is about trying to do the right
watch it for yourself if you want.
It kills me.
That's censorship. And are you really gonna pretend
he's gonna get rid of the half truths
while that's literally their shtick?
The guy reporting to you about how he's
gonna do that is the king of half
truths? Come on. I mean, what they're doing
is suppressing people that are highlighting they're wrong
or in many cases, they just disagree with.
But that, regardless of how you frame it,
is censorship. But thanks for the investigation
about that ultimately tells you go back to
sleep, everything's fine.
Well, Darth Powell
calls this out and says, Elon, you know,
the last b e h one b point.
Excuse me.
H one b discussion,
where basically, they said you're wrong. And and
I very not that the one he actually
responded to was not even that contentious. And
he goes, take a big step back and
f yourself in the face, like, trying to
be funny, like like, from trop topic thunder,
but it didn't get taken that way. And
so he goes, Elon, f your f your
face, American workers. I'm starting a war. Day
2 of the war. Z o m g,
stop being so negative, and they're raping kids
now. It's just so funny. Like, people see
how disjointed this all is. Right? So you
you get you get exposed, your own team
turns against you, and then you're like, no.
You guys are being negative. Let's be positive.
And over there, UK, you have the raping
and and the, you know which by the
way, there's a point to get into in
the story. But it's just crazy to me
how it is so just
re it's lurching, reactive. Like, it just it
is it's I think most people sense it.
And let me just brief a guide. If
you wanna, you can see.
I can't even I lost count.
It's wild
how,
like, transparent this is. So right on a
dime after that went down, he literally just
went on a spree of going UK, Muslims,
rape,
nonstop, nonstop, nonstop.
Here's just a few of them. It says
how the rape of Britain was covered up,
like, out of nowhere. Like, this is, I
mean, in the context of what was going
on. Now there are stories to be discussed
here about people, whatever their religion, wherever they're
from, doing horrible crimes against people, And sexual
crimes in particular are in children. They should
get the worst
sentence possible in my mind.
But it's and I'll I'll make these points
clear as we go through this. The argument
to somehow make this about all Muslims or
all Islamic culture is so
inherently disgusting.
Like, that this it shows you the racist
vein that they are flaming.
Guys, this is Laura Loomer stuff. This is
the same dynamic. Are we really to pretend
that anything Islamic anywhere is bad?
The neighbor who lives across the street from
you who's born in Chicago, that just because
he prac that he's immediately bad?
It's ridiculous. It's like saying any Jewish person
is bad. It's the same stupid, ignorant, racist
mindset. I don't care if the vast majority
are like that. To make it everybody is
still disgusting. And I think we can very
easily show that's not the case. And then
also very easily show that most of the
radical examples we can prove have been
co manufactured,
driven into reality by Israel and United States
and the rest of the elements they're using.
It's been outlined. It's been documented by WikiLeaks
and by everybody else, but here are the
people who in other context would be pointing
out the most falling into the trap because
Trump and Elon are doing it.
So the point is that, yes, The Telegraph
reports the child victims of rape were denied
justice and protection from the state to preserve
the image of a successful multicultural society. That's
their framing. Now not even getting into the
topic because we've we already talked about this
the last time they brought it up.
And in the reality of it that needs
to be discussed, but also the point and
again, the point about, like, the UK government
and ignoring a crime just because they don't
think it's politically inconvenient. There's that's just the
way they all act. It's disgusting. It needs
to be called out.
They are abusing the situation for their own
political benefit and, in doing so, hiding what
we all see happening here or, to make
an overlapping point, ignoring the mass rape dynamic
that Israel's playing out against Palestinians.
While, now I'll get to it at the
end, a massive new report comes out and
proves there were not a single rape allegation
on October 7th. We'll get there.
Lying about it as well as ignoring the
reality in regard to Israel and then them
hyping a story over here in the context
or in the midst of their kind of
dissolving empire.
But here's one.
I mean, guys, these are, like, all day
nonstop. Here's another one.
And another one. Many of these are overlapping,
by the way. And a lot of them
are Mario Not Fal just continuing to push
the I mean, these guys have marching orders,
I'm convinced, is my opinion. Because it's not
hard to see how it correlates almost exactly
with what they wanna talk about that day.
To more the the more you investigate, the
worse it gets. Beyond what you think is
possible. That's what he's saying. This one says,
I feel like and a lot of these
are just individual people's posts. I feel like
the main pea and and look, we're talking
about similar if you look at these posts,
it always seems to be the same so
many people. And And that doesn't make it
any less important.
But literally talking about, like, a mass genocide,
or even just in a in a different
context, talking about what they're doing in this
country.
And yet, the only focus ends up being
about what you can use to make it
about a racial point. Instead of just that
these people are disgusting and they rape children,
or the fact that you can highlight how
there are examples of that that they ignore,
like Saudi Arabia or Israel, for example.
But
that there are examples of specific cases that
get embellished and and driven, like, not in
the sense that their cases are embellished, but
the idea of what it represents.
Just because somebody ends up being from another
country and then carry out an attack, that
doesn't mean that country is responsible or that
that culture is responsible.
We all should know this though. This is
just insane that we let these people drive
these kind of narratives.
And he says, that judge should be removed
from the bench in disgrace.
Like, just everyone go and this is another
screenshot
from another screenshot
about another thing that happened in the UK.
And, yes, these and a kid, killing a
teen with a machete. Like, it's a horrible,
horrifying thing. Yeah. But the point is, guys,
you can see this stuff happening all around
the world. For if there's a white guy,
whether it's any number of things, and it's
not some unique thing to a certain race
or a certain culture.
This is being driven into your reality as
Whitney called it the clash of civilizations they're
trying to manufacture.
Here he says, for anyone doubting the severity
and depravity of the mass gang rapes of
little girls in Britain like, I don't I
don't think anybody's denying that this that there
are crimes happening that are that disgusting.
The idea that there are gangs of rapists,
whether they're Muslim or not. Are we to
pretend that there's
no gangs of white men raping people?
I guarantee you there's examples of that somewhere
in the world. Does that make all white
men responsible or all Christians?
This is a very loose effort to try
to go after a very specific agenda for
a very specific reason.
Go to the source material. Read the court
transcripts.
And here's suppressed news saying Israeli gang rapes.
And then if you just wanna look at
his feed,
it's interesting to me.
That that's just refresh, by the way. This
is from 2 hours ago. Something about the
UK, Naruto Farage, the same conversation.
Here's the same thing. Designate terrorist group to
host Islamic Supremacy Conference in another place. You
know, while we're ignoring the fact that they're
all supporting open terrorists in Syria, by the
way, literally the people. But that doesn't matter.
We're not gonna talk about those ones that
are raping and torturing in Syria because we
support them. No. No. No. We're gonna make
it about a group anywhere away from what
we're connected to. Focus over there. This is
not about trying to say these things aren't
important. It's about trying to highlight how he
is flailing, trying to get you to look
at anything other than what is demonstrating in
front of him right now.
And it it it's just Islamists are holding
a conference on January 18th in Canada on
how to defeat all non Muslim nations and
create a global caliphate, it says.
It's a screenshot. Now, again, I haven't this
is this my point today was not to
go into this.
But when he say, is this accurate? Like,
you realize how stupid that is? So you
can't just type the name into the search
engine and find out for yourself? You know
what he wanted to do? Was make it
a bigger story even if it wasn't real.
I and look, I have a look into
it. How much you wanna bet you look
it up and it's probably not the accurate
story? Either way, it doesn't matter because now
it has 3,500,000
views and it's gonna keep going up.
That's how this works.
Kills me.
Same thing. Wow. Wow.
Thank you.
Pete, I mean, it's just 3 yes.
Emoji.
It's the guys, he this is being engineered.
I mean, I'm quite I I think it's
pretty obvious that half the time you can
see the timing of this is not even
him.
Today, a number of prominent journalists criticized my
suggestion that the UK media has failed.
That's he is hyper fixated on this story.
Why?
Why now? What happened? Because the agenda is
to get this narrative going aggressively
on the heels
of the Cybertruck conversation.
Despite the fact that it was 2 military
members from from Fort Bragg,
one of which was white, the other one
which was apparently not a Muslim, and the
overarching point being it's about ISIS Al Qaeda
even though we can prove those are US
Israeli proxies. So what am I missing here?
It's an agenda. Like, one of the most
poorly constructed ones I've seen in a long
time to drive you back into an old
agenda that benefits Israel.
I I I could go on for it
just never stops.
Now this one is interestingly US related, but
it's about the larger story that ties back
to that conversation. Now this is an interesting
conversation, by the way, about the
the so basically, all Republicans voted in favor
of a bill that
basically it it was titled something different, like
violence something, but ultimately did amount to
I've to sum it up quickly, it was
basically being able to deport people, specifically e
aliens
with less a lower bar if it had
to do with any kind of a crime
or sexual violence, which why would anybody vote
against that?
But the point is that there's almost always
political dynamics going on within this. And I
bet you if you read through it all,
there's probably something that they decided to fixate
on. They say, well, this is their game.
They're gonna use this to deport these people
when Trump comes to power. And so they
just kinda blacklist it and don't vote for
it. Now I'm not saying I agree with
that. The bottom line is that's how this
game gets played. It's never really about the
main focal point when it comes down to
why that happens.
Like, for example, the stop arming terrorist act
that Tulsi Gabbard put forward that basically no
Republicans voted for. That should matter. Right? But
the point was they had a sticking point
on it. They said, well, it's a that's
gonna hinder our efforts to go after a
fight for freedom in the form, you know,
whatever.
So may maybe they just wanted to fund
terrorists or maybe they just decided to think
it was gonna hinder their agenda or stop
making money for them. Regardless,
it still relates back to the idea of
foreign entities raping children. So he's really drilling
this idea in, and I think it's very
telling.
Oh, of course, here, it just takes takes
a moment of his day to retweet Joe
Lonsdale from Palantir. No big deal. But, of
course, generally, on
similar things we're talking about, colonialism doesn't resonate
for the US.
Where was it?
I'm proud of the history of the US
and the principles that make our country exceptional.
Maybe this is a different one. I thought
there was one that had to do with
anyway, the the bottom line was just kinda
going through the the majority of these. This
one being UK again, this one being UK
again, this one just kind of taking a
moment away to say, we're number 1. This
Tesla owner Silicon Valley app seems to be
kind of, like, facilitating Elon's praising of himself
that he then just retweets, or it's just
Twitter's the best ever. And he goes, yep.
See? Because they said it. It's all interconnected
with what he's doing. Cerner must go. Like,
so think about how interesting this is. You
have a guy who is clearly very like,
depending on what position he has or regardless,
it's quite obvious that everyone perceives him to
be very influential in the incoming administration.
The president of the United States.
He is right now tweeting, the leader of
the UK has to go. You realize how
crazy that is? Like, from a what if
you remember what the US would do if
their leaders were saying that Trump has to
be removed from power?
I just I think that's worthy of acknowledgment,
guys. These people are either trying to cause
some kind of massive in,
conflict conflagration or can't say that, you know,
explosion of political dynamics,
or
he's trying to do something that derails the
current exposure of what they're doing.
That just seems like a wild thing to
me. Like, think about that. Do you you
know what this government would do?
Anyway, you get it. On and on and
on and on. I mean, guys, it's it's
nonstop. It is this it's literally nonstop. It
goes down. It goes keeps going. So
Alex Jones steps in, same point, by the
way. Elon sharing more about the same conversation.
This that case he's calling out the king
in relation to him covering for the larger
issue. And Alex Jones chimes in, of course,
has to kind of stay on the coattails
and says, the king is the front man
for the group, destroying the UK and the
rest of the west. Oh, it's the king,
is it? The king so you tell me
the king's the front man for Israel? Well,
maybe that's not what he's actually saying. Even
though there might actually be more truth to
that. I would not expect him to remove
his faithful servant
because it's all about the UK. Right? It's
all about the well, by the way, what's
interesting,
Matt Ehret has opened my eyes a lot
more over the years to the the more
truth than you realize to how much the
UK does, in fact, influence larger dynamics. And
we all tend to have our you know,
we have an American centric perspective on how
the US seems to dictate what's going on.
People in the UK go back even further
in history and think that ultimately even more
removed from insacracy that the UK is really
calling all the shots. Some Some people think
that Israel is doing it overall. I mean,
it's hard to tell. But I get the
point that you can go back and really
start to see that some of these long
term agendas stem from the UK long before
the creation of the United States and have
continued through the United States. But that's not
the point today.
The point here
is to deviate,
to remove you know, change direction. Stop looking
over here.
The king is the front man, even though
obviously what's destroying the west right now is
not the king. I mean, obvious points to
be made about the US, the UK, and,
you know, the leadership of both, But it's
obvious what I think. I think it's pretty
transparent that what they are pointing to is
being driven by Israel, but that's my point
about how they refuse to do that. He'll
scream globalism all day long and never mention
Zionism in Israel in that context for a
reason, even though it's a central part of
the globalist agenda.
And then Whitney says, any comment on how
king Charles and Trump's nominee or he's asked
she's asking Trump or Alex. Any comment on
how King Charles and Trump's nominee for treasury
secretary,
the ex Soros guy, are super close friends?
You see, they'll never get into that. Not
really. He may allude to it one day
and point it out like he's done in
the past where, I don't know, Trump may
be the antichrist, but then go on to
tell you how Trump's the best guy in
the world for the next 4 hours. That's
how that tends to go.
He says, how dare Elon Musk expose the
biggest pedophile network on earth?
See, because what you're getting
is a reaction
to what we're talking about. What's funny, though,
is I'm not saying that is not worthy
of discussion. Right? That's not what do you
but but that's the response. How dare you
call out that thing? No. No. I don't
have an issue with calling out what's going
on. I have an issue with using that
to divert attention away from what you guys
are trying to carry out. That's what I
care about. So that's that that's why that
response is like, how dare you do that?
Like, we should just go thank you for
pointing at something when you're clearly ignoring
all those same things everywhere else, by the
way, but also trying to hide what's going
on here. And subjective views is, Alex, are
you in favor of a social credit score?
Even though it's kind of pretend criticism of
this was, you know, or rather be it
was pretend was my point.
So he he points these things out, which
are very real.
Alex says 2 questions.
Is that an official ex policy? And if
so, please provide a link. Thanks. Well, you
know what he's doing. Now as I said,
it could definitely be Grok saying something that
they're gonna claim was wrong or that it's
inaccurate or that Grok got it wrong. That's
certainly possible.
But it's Grok. We're tell it's from their
information. They even put it to it. He
knows that. He's just trying to stick keep
it opaque so they can't hold him responsible.
He then follows up and says, I don't
know where rock is getting, though, that leftist
mindset.
Really, man?
If any form of what IT it said
was implemented would not support it.
How I mean, it's literally happening
well before Grok was pointing these things out.
I just if you can't recognize what a
willful
this is willful dishonesty for his benefit. That's
my opinion.
Now Voluntarist minister says Grok has no knowledge
of internal algorithms that have not been implemented
yet. Elon just said nothing has changed yet.
What it does have is access to publicly
available posts and Internet search. It's generating from
that and it's likely the source of the
of the leftism, he's saying.
It's likely also drawing from worst case scenarios
down, duomerism. Right? So the point is to
remember that it's just it's just scooping up
information, but it only has access to what
has been input to it.
So I I mean, it's fair points. But
I think the obvious reality is this is
trying to willfully ignore how obvious this is
by
using this,
basically, it's something he's doing here he would
not do if it was a Democrat.
I think we've all seen that already. The
simple tangential connection to it would be more
than enough to rant about it for an
hour. The point here is that you can
prove this is happening well before this point,
well before the recent algorithmic change.
They just don't wanna point it out.
Now what's funny to me, by the way,
after we and we I've I have been
pointing this stuff out a lot more lately.
But as I said, it's not because of
anything other than the fact that it's pretty
clear how the dishonesty they're they're driving
is is let's not this is not like
I said in the beginning, this is not
normal politics, guys. There's something very alarming coming,
and I hope I'm wrong. They are literally
and it's not and, again, it's being discussed.
The the digital ID, the social credit, the
all these different things, the biometric checkpoints.
This is terrifying. When you overlap that with
what we're gonna get into next about the
neuro side of this, the nanotechnology, which is
not upper not a not a
is being at least pointed to as what
they will be implementing.
That's something that is very concerning.
And so my point is if you have
people who are very obviously, in my opinion,
gaslighting that, hiding certain things, ignoring Israel's connection,
well, yes. Then I'm gonna say, well, that
needs to be called out because that is
suppressing the truth.
Anyway, David Icke, for example, who's much more
prominent, has been really going to town about
how Alex is deceiving. Let's not forget Bill
Hicks or, Bill Cooper
from a long time ago, who a lot
of people say kind of emulate that he
emulates, who has before he went away was
very much calling Alex Jones out as a
deliberate deceiver.
I didn't know that until recently. And I
thought that was powerful because of how much
they tend to reference back. But
he comes out and he says oh, actually,
they they quote Whitney Webb,
who is coming off of Alex Jones saying,
breaking
every time. Emergency broadcast every 30 seconds. That's
why it becomes a special super emergency broadcast
when it's not. Because if everything's an emergency,
well, you gotta have a higher level once
you have something really emergency. But it says,
terror alert. Federal whistle blowers warn that on
outgoing Biden administration was aware of the ISIS
attacks. Oh, but the ones that we now
are
very quickly realizing weren't actually ISIS attacks or
the reports about the ISIS cells they were
hunting were irrelevant because this wasn't actually an
ISIS. Yeah. Important to always remember how quickly
these narratives change. Or what happened with the
drones, Alex? That's why we had 17 different
confirmed stories about how they were all what
you knew and it changed every day. But
now what? Now it's gone. Guess we won't
talk about anymore until it comes up next,
and we can scream about it again.
She says, how are you guys leaving out
that ISIS is a creation of US and
Israeli intelligence?
Didn't that used to be your bag, telling
people about these obvious US proxies? Now you're
just a salesman for the war on domestic
terror.
Exactly.
Now this is funny. So Harrison
talks about this.
He says he says, why is everyone suddenly
desperate? We're not desperate. We're just simply pointing
out the truth. If the truth is makes
you feel desperate, that'd be different. Why is
everybody suddenly desperate to try to discredit Infowars
and Alex Jones? Well, again, buddy, don't not
really hard to do. You guys are doing
it for yourselves.
We explicitly said multiple times that ISIS is
an American proxy army, but people hear the
opposite. No one said you didn't say that,
man. The point is you're leaving out a
half of the story, first of all. So
you didn't even address what she said. How
how what a huge,
glaring, like, a silence is deafening point right
there. She goes, you're leaving out. It's a
creation of the US and Israel. And he
goes,
how many times have we said it's a
US proxy? Oh, wait a minute. You missed
a part. I wonder why. Now the point
overall is that it's not about just saying
it's a u an American proxy. It's about
including that in the context of the current
story. So when you guys are making it
about some Muslim invasion and ISIS attacks,
how does that make sense if you recognize
it as an American proxy?
I mean, at the same time, if you're
gonna make it only about Biden, which I'm
sure that's where they would go, realize that
there were ISIS elements that happened during Trump's
administration or that were run by people in
his administration, on and on and on. The
point is that this is just an effort
to address the
failing influence at this point, where the people
are beginning to call out what they're doing.
And thank god because it's been so obvious
for so long.
Patrick
tagging Elon Musk
yet again in another example highlighting the same
ridiculous,
aggressive, Zionist propaganda platform called Visiguad 24, who's
been caught lying
in all realms of conversation in in in
the gods of genocide.
I pointed them out lying 15 times about
food, about all sorts of things.
And Elon shared most of those, and now
we have the conversation in Venezuela where they
lied about the machines they were they said
they were voting machines they were taking, and
he shared that. That got debunked by even
Twitter check fact fact checks. And here he
is again. It just it doesn't matter because
it's not about truth, you guys. If you
saw an account that got you tricked into
sharing fake news many times, that then had
to have at least made you feel bad
at least at some point if you cared
all about the truth, why would you keep
sharing their content?
Because it's not about the truth.
So he goes, exclamation marks. Right? Because that's
he was busy that day.
And this is only about 1% of the
British population is Pakistani men. But according to
the cock bane report, which, again, is that
accurate? I don't know. This isn't where we're
gonna into today. My point is just how
quickly did you think he checked this? No.
He saw Visiguard and said exclamation mark. Just
like before.
They committed 80% of the gang rapes.
Now the point is, if that is accurate,
well, yes, that needs to be addressed. But
that still would not then represent every Pakistani
in the world or every religion you think
they share. Because what if some of them
are Christians, some of them are Muslim? Same
point that they were in the world. But
you see, it's inherently racist, this conversation, to
make it about because they're Pakistani.
Even not in the context of the group
that did it, that are Pakistani, but in
the context of immigration.
But he says, so Elon is now retweeting
the notorious VISR guy 24. But, again, the
point is I bet you these things are
based on false information.
1 on top did it says one of
the top disinformation accounts on Twitter
works for the nafo troll brigade, Israeli government,
and Ukraine government propaganda. I mean, guys, just
take a dance back through their it's embarrassing
how often they share unverifiable
information or things that have been flat out
proven to be wrong.
Gil says he's been retweeting and taking at
face value every b s of that Poland's
disinformation account since long time now. He has.
If you make a list of accounts that
Musk regularly retweets and boosts,
90% of them, that's that's his metric, but
I agree it's most of them,
are literally deep state US NATO missile disinformation
accounts.
Think about that. Now you can disagree. Sure.
But if you are even remotely aware of
what that is or it is regret itself,
ask yourself how an outsider rebel fighting the
deep state would be almost exclusively sharing information
from US NATO missile disinformation accounts.
Kim Iverson makes an excellent point. Says, I'm
old enough to remember when people on this
app were freaking out about tourists rape being
raped in India by Indians who were not
Muslim.
But now that Pakistanis are raping, it's a
Muslim thing.
Was it a catholic cack Catholic thing? When
little boys are being raped by priests?
Same point, guys. Like, look. There it's any
group is of course, you can consider that.
It it'd be it it would be irresponsible
not to. But to broad stroke an entire
group, no matter the context, has always been
ignorant.
I don't even know why we have to
re explain these things today. Not only to
you guys, but I mean to people out
there who fall for this stuff. It has
always been that way because it is ignorant.
Because it's almost near impossible, whether mathematically or
otherwise, to claim every single person of every
group is gonna be one thing. That's just
dumb.
It's lowbrow.
So
to the Republicans, Christian Republicans, who are now
making this about a Muslim thing because brown
skin people did these things in the UK,
which most of them did,
and how you're assuming their religion, which by
the way is important.
But
when the Catholic church was caught for this,
did or rather the the the specifically the
priests were caught, did you guys make it
about Catholics?
Because you could make the same point. And
a lot of people did, by the way.
Made it about some Catholic church thing. Now
I disagree with that. I think it's inherently
about the people that were doing this, and
there are good people that were priests. But
no of course, you could take a further
step back and talk about the power structure
around the Catholic church.
But that in that this context, that would
be like saying the power structure around the
country country we're pointing to. But I point
either way.
They didn't do that. Why not? It's the
same
response either way.
Then again,
doing the same as anything.
Let's go let's tap into Jimmy Saville because
that gets a lot of shares. Right?
About the UK again. Mario Nopel. BBC shielded
one of their biggest pedophiles. Of course, they
did. Just like Dennis Haster in the United
States. Oops. Jeffrey Epstein in the United States.
Oops. We don't talk about those, though we
do, though. My point is in this context.
They're using this point to make it out
to be that they're they're protecting the rapists
in the UK, which I'm not even suggesting
they're not. My point though is that this
is about trying to deviate attention away when
there's just as many points as this happening
in this country and your government, the people
you're working with,
not in the case of specifically what he's
highlighting. My my point is about the larger
discussion about trying to deviate from what we're
dealing with here
by pointing to an old story.
These are governments. They're all bad. We should
be criticizing all of them. And guess who
else is in the government? Elon Musk.
Now please don't take any of this as
trying to diminish the story of the UK.
I'm only using this in the context of
showing what he is trying to do.
People that are committing crimes in the UK,
especially sexual crimes, should be absolutely be held
accountable. And if anybody's covering these things up
or trying to stop them from going to
jail, then they should go to jail too.
Seems pretty simple.
What they're doing is using these stories to
make something bigger happen, which is pretty disgusting.
Patrick says, for the bright sparks out there
and this is Elon Musk in all in
the same time frame. He's now screaming to
release Tommy Robinson.
You know, the guy that appears to be
a massage agent as far as I can
tell. Says, for the bright sparks out there,
if this is an IQ test,
Elon Musk utterly failed.
The fact remains that Tommy Robinson,
actual name, Stefan Yaxley Lennon,
Tommy is a stage name,
is not in jail for exposing grooming gangs.
That's what he that's what Elon again, it's
the same conversation.
It's about the gangs in the UK and
his effort to expose that. That that's what
they're you making this about. Free him now.
They're obsessed with this topic right now. That's
not why he was arrested.
Says rather, he banged up for contempt of
court
due to his ham fisted attempt to get
a journalism scoop by defaming a Syrian refugee
boy named Jamal. This is easy to verify.
You never bothered to read the case
the case complaint, did you?
You went with the Tommy talking point on
face value. Like the ones we just showed
you too, by the way. With all due
respect, what's left of it, that's just dumb.
You can find these you can read
specifically, Patrick has gone through these. We've talked
about this in the past.
The obvious point is he didn't care about
the information being correct. It was useful for
the narrative he's spinning. That's what I think,
and I think it's pretty obvious.
He says, and now you're now you are
imploding.
If you don't believe me, maybe ask your
surrogate, Brain Grock, why Tommy Robinson is in
jail right now because it will tell you
the same thing Patrick is saying. Do not
consign yourself to clown world Elon. Stop taking
your cues from billionaire Bill and the lobby.
Come back to reality.
Andrea Lynn, somebody who, by the way, needs
deserves to be shouted out for taking the
stance right in the beginning of this. The
moment she sussed out what we're talking about,
as I believe she's a conservative, she called
this out.
Says the greatest threat to America is are
is the voters who blindly cheer for politicians,
comply with tyranny,
and continue to place faith in the system.
This criminal enterprise cannot thrive, perpetuate its deceptions,
or impose greater tyranny without the support of
useful idiots who willingly enable it.
It's important to think about, guys. If we
all decided not to play along,
other than them using military force,
they've lost their power.
Of course, Ken O'Keefe,
the one that Elon's trying to use, who
would equally call out Elon, and he does,
shows you that Massie is right about the
speaker of the house selection, which again, Trump
Trump endorsed.
The MAGA side is now forcing people to
lean into despite 30 seconds ago telling you
he was the problem. Right?
Because of the bill, of the spending bill,
they he proved he was on our side,
and then Trump tapped him anyways. They go,
never mind.
Not the conservatives, but the people driving the
bus of the Team Smart Politics. A lot
of conservatives are very unhappy about this.
Now he says APAC Johnson should be removed
from power, not given the speaker of the
house. And here he is recently pictured next
to next to this the one of the
most
clownish figures in this conversation,
Schmooley.
This guy that got boxed out by his
own group because people I'm talking about politically,
because of how crazy he was getting.
Who basically was handling RFK Junior for some
reason in the beginning, answering questions for him
on stage. Something very weird.
Now Shanna Joy says, think about this. And
by the way, she we just connected again.
I'm gonna be joining her soon on a
show coming up neck this week, I think.
Says, think about this. We raged against lockdowns
and vaccines for 4 years, then reelected the
scoundrels who did it to us in the
first place.
At some point, we're going to have to
accept that we, the people, are a big
part of the problem.
They won't change until we do. Now what
I agree with you're saying, but in the
context of what I was just pointing out,
it's about the people who still can't
that
whether or not you want to believe in
them, allow that belief to circumvent the logic
of the situation.
Right? We need to be able to see
what Elon is exposing of himself right now.
Most are. But the ones that are choosing
to ignore it, that's what she's highlighting, I
think.
Informed nurses says, what was the other choice?
Now this is the one of the biggest
problems. Now look, it's not an invalid question.
Okay?
It's not they need to be addressed in
separate conversations because the reality went to to
to reactively turn to, well, what other choice
do we have is to ignore the problem.
Not to say it's a wrong question, but
it still ignores the problem. As if we
can't decide on a choice, then we ignore
the problem. That it's a very quick and
well crafted manipulation.
But she says stop false thinking.
They are false choices.
We can choose to exit the system. Now
you even ignoring the last part, which I
agree with more than anything, it's simply the
idea that regardless is a false choice.
Or let's just say they were the only
2 choices in the world. It doesn't change
the fact that we still have a problem,
and we have to deal with that. By
ignoring the problem because you think there's no
other choices allows the problem to continue. Now
if you wanna pretend that we'll never be
able to solve the problem, which I don't
know anybody saying that, then at least express
that. The bottom line is that the bottom
line is we know we have something we
can solve, and we need to stop pretending
that the choices they provide are the only
ones we have at our disposal.
Now, again, this kind of stuff, I just
wanna point out quickly. It's just it's just
funny to me because
I've never seen a time where partisans were
this easy to manipulate.
And I don't again, I don't think it's
all of them, but far more than I'd
expect
how easy it is.
So right now, I'm really trying to ring
drive home the 2 party illusion. These these
Whether they know it or not, your government
is one monolithic thing that is trying to
control your life.
As long as they can keep you fighting
each other, keep you thinking you're on different
teams, they will always be able to keep
this machine rolling.
So what's funny to me is while we're
getting traction. Right? We're showing people, and they're
seeing it. They this kind of thing happens,
and it just makes people really, like, this
is so to me,
it just feels so transparent.
Biden awards medal of freedom
to people like George Soros, Hillary Clinton,
you know, and just and and the point
and, of course, you see this takeover conversation
at least briefly
where they're going, I knew it. Like, Nikki
Haley comes out and goes, we need president
more than ever because of things like this.
You know, it's just like they're so it's
so transparent.
Because you know if you it's like when
Elon taps into the Democrats trying to come
after Trump kinda thing.
Well, they know that's gonna grab attention because
it's entertaining at the very least.
This, they know this is them trolling you.
That partisans are so easy to troll right
now Because you know they're gonna go, what?
George Soros? Hillary Clinton? That's crazy. You know,
they're gonna freak out about that. Who cares
in the context of what's happening right now?
You know, at the end of the day,
these are meaningless. Same thing with the the
honestly, with the Nobel Peace Prize at this
point given to people that are the opposite
of that. Like, this has become so overly
politicized. It's all just talking points. The re
the point is this is getting you, I
think, to reactively freak out about something to
ignore
anything else that's going on in front of
you.
And Steve Cunningham saw right through it. He
says when the fake left rolls the fake
right. This is perfect.
This is that's that's just one of the
people I think is Jane Goodall or whatever.
This this is Clint who sit right next
to her right there.
Just funny to me.
Now this
is not a new clip, but it still
is worth reiterating because this is terrifying. Because
this is what they're building and this is
what's happening right now.
This is
Pam Bondi, one of the other wildly pro
Israel Zionist Trump's Trump can't,
administrative. Jeez. Trump
how would I say that? Trump team administrator
and a person that's on Trump's administration. I
I always try to continue at the you
know, if I trap myself with words. But
she is now reiterating
and has Trump's statement about getting rid of
people, but in a very specific way that
is exactly the way that we're talking about.
Not the worst ones, not breaking the law,
but basically saying, if you say you support
something that they don't like, that you need
to be removed.
Very important. And this is terrifying because they're
right now creating these tribal
elements where it's just like, if you're part
of this, you need to be you know,
know, like, that's what they're doing with Islam
in general, but this gets radicalized very quickly
to where it becomes like we just saw,
people supporting Palestine.
And you already see how easily they conflate
those conversations. Suddenly, you're saying, we want Palestinians
not to die, and that means you're pro
radical Islam or whatever. And and people then
respond. What's funny is they're all screaming about
radical things while they're the ones being radicalized,
but that's how this tends to go. But
this is not just about that. It's about
them using whatever they can to
control your life in ways that are so
dramatically the opposite of what they're promising you.
In this case, DC Drano, of course, comes
out and says, this is what we need.
Remember all those foreign students who, by the
way,
they're talking about just the protests
that were not all foreign I mean, it's
just it's it's so dishonest the way it's
all gets framed. Who publicly celebrated Hamas when
they killed over a 1000,000 people.
And by the way, we all know by
now that those over a 1000 people were
majority they were in a majority killed by
Israel. That's not debatable. Israel has owned that
or at least parts of their government.
Hannibal directive has been or was ordered. They
just don't care about that though. So now
that we know it was Israel and that
we know that Israel had funded Hamas up
until the 20 up until October 10th,
does that change the conversation? Or October 7th.
Sorry. I was thinking of the report that
came out in 10th.
So, obviously, that then changes the dynamic, but
they don't the dynamic, they don't care about
that. Remember all those foreign students who publicly
celebrated Hamas? Well, okay. Well, even then, you
can prove that the vast majority were simply
celebrating
Palestine.
They then say that means Hamas, but when
they report it, they say they were out
there screaming, we love Hamas. Were they? Or
is that how you're interpreting that? These people
are dishonest. It's all in the interest of
Israel. And what they ultimately say is those
people need to be removed from the country.
So hear what they're saying, guys.
It's just our incredible incoming US attorney general,
Pam Bondi,
says they will be deported soon.
Think about that.
So I don't care if you think they
were celebrating Hamas or not.
You're not allowed to celebrate something because they
don't like it? I don't care if it's
a terrorist group or not. At what point
did it become illegal to say, I like
what happened right there?
Only in a country where your freedoms are
being disregarded, where they say later, we should
get the FBI to speak to them. That's
what she says. So now you're gonna be
harassed by the gestapo because you say something
they don't like and because you say it's
terrorism. Well, you know how many things they
say are terrorism?
A lot of things that are not terrorism.
On top of that, the terrorism they commit
is not terrorism, or the fact that they
are funding
Hamas to commit the thing. Doesn't matter.
This it says, sorry, but we don't want
people who celebrate terrorism and mass murder visiting
our country. So he's trying to make it
about only foreign people. Listen to what she
says. He knows what she said. These are
dishonest people. Democrats like Alan Dershowitz have sounded
the alarm
over the growing virulent strain of Jew haters
in the Democrat party. It appears their agents
in the unfair press are carrying that water.
It is dangerous. Is it not?
Yeah. It's very dangerous, Chris. It's extremely
dangerous. And, you know, you look around the
the thing that's really the most troubling to
me, these students
in universities
in our country, whether they're here as Americans
or if they're here on student visas and
they're out there saying, I support Hamas.
You and I have seen that on all
of these television shows.
Oh, very well. Very very well informed. Yeah.
I saw it on a TV show. That's
our attorney general, ladies and gentlemen. Oh, great.
So you're gonna see a TV show tell
you they did this. And do they say
that or are they saying free Palestine?
That matters. But secondarily,
so they say I support Hamas. I thought
we lived in a free country. Aren't we
aren't we the ones being told we're allowed
to think and feel what we want? Except
this and not that. Not on Twitter. Not
at this time. Not if you say it
this way. Make sure you're positive. Free speech.
Guys, this is terrifying that we can't be
real about this. These people are literally saying
we're gonna deport Americans because they say something
we disagree with. Yeah. That's dangerous if they
hate Jews.
Yeah. I would equally say people who hate
Jews or hate Muslims,
either way, are disgusting,
irreparable people. But the bottom line,
they have a right to feel that way.
That's protected
speech and thought.
It's it's it's unnerving how the people who
are right now screaming about thoughtcrime, like, you
know, the same things that we've all been
talking about, but are the ones that, I
guess, not right now, but more so right
before this,
during the COVID 19 dynamic, we're talking about
this. Thoughtcrime.
Right? Censorship,
control, technocracy, the great reset. Now they're all
blinded to it, the ones we're pointing to
anyway, not the majority.
But they are almost driving forward what they
claim they were fighting. Now I cannot see
that without thinking many of them are part
of the agenda.
These people are Zionists,
and they are literally telling you they're gonna
deport Americans because of an Israeli agenda, and
we're screaming America first.
In that water,
it is dangerous. Is it not?
Yeah. It's very dangerous, Chris. It's extremely dangerous.
And, you know, you look around the the
thing that really was troubling to me, these
students
in universities
in our country,
whether they're here as Americans or if they're
here on student visas, and they're out there
saying I support Hamas,
you and I have seen that on all
of these television shows. Frankly, they need to
be taken out of our country or the
FBI needs to be interviewing them right away
when they're saying, I support Hamas, I am
Hamas.
That's not saying I support all these poor
Palestinians
who are trapped in Gaza. That's not what
they're saying.
Well, yes. In most cases, that is what
they're saying. But mostly, the point is that
they still have the right to say all
of those things.
Right?
Right. So think about it like this. If
we if if Elon Musk came out and
said he supports ISIS, does he get deported?
It's just a point. It's just something he
says he supports.
Or if he says I support Palestine, you
then make that a terrorist group. What if
I say I support Hezbollah even though it's
not a terrorist organization? They say it is.
The bottom line is very transparent, guys. They're
telling you you'll be removed from the country.
Why? Because you're saying something. But let's ask
a question. Let's just say that was deemed
a crime.
Okay? Let let's just even say aside from
the idea that it is a crime or
whether or not, you know, that or, of
course, the point of the government making illegitimate
things crimes. But that's a different conversation. That's
still valid. Point is, let's just say they
made it a crime. Let's say if you
say I support ISIS, it's actually you can
get a year in jail. Okay.
You're not deported for a crime. You're not
deported for breaking the law. They're literally trying
to jump over everything and say, we wanna
remove you from this country. Even as an
American citizen, if we decide
that you say these things, even in any
other context, you can commit a you can
murder somebody and you just go to jail.
But not if you say anything Israel doesn't
like, we'll kick you out of the country.
Please, conservatives,
wake up to this.
So I think their student visas need to
be revoked. I think we need to reinstate
president Trump's travel ban immediately.
There's a lot of things that can be
done to stop this. Yeah. You realize the
travel ban was done at least in the
context of that time under the guise of
certain circumstances?
Right? Even though what they're doing now is
revealing that was never the reality? Because if
you're just simply banning certain countries, how is
that not racist? Think about it. You're simply
saying these countries are not allowed to come
here. It's it's so every single person in
that country is bad?
Because it's again, at the point they first
did that, it was about the context of
the current situation that was going on, that
there was influx and that was a problem.
I I I can understand that if whether
or not I agree with it. Now it's
just saying, well, of course, the same point
is the narrative that the influx of immigration,
it's the same idea, but it still comes
down to the idea that those people are
the problem.
Even though we can prove in a 1000
different ways, the people who are radicalizing these
elements are the very people that you're supporting
in the Trump administration,
in the UK, in Israel.
Anti Semitism
is is rampant throughout this country now, and
it's truly, truly heartbreaking.
Really not.
I mean, it's actually verifiably not. It's a
it's a bunch of hyped up narrative based
on Palestinian flags, which has been exposed
by a 1,000 different I mean, I mean,
right? We covered this on this show.
Glenn Greenblatt himself getting leaked and show the
the bottom line that it became a, what,
a 400% increase, and it was immediately shown
to be anything Palestinian related was called antisemitism.
And they owned that. They said because it
is. It's not though.
The reality being that they then used that
to claim a dark cloud of antisemitism, and
then went on to fake about 15 different
antisemitic events.
Not debatable. We talked about them all.
Poked in flag with a, you know, poked
in the eye with a flag and on
and on and on.
So all they're doing is and then by
the way, even if they were all real,
that's still protected speech.
But not for them. Not if Israel says.
To see what's happening to all of our
Jewish friends in this country
by really just I think a lot of
ignorant kids and students and people who don't
understand
that Hamas
equals terrorism, even worse, at its worst.
Okay. Well, let's ask then why Israel was
funding them. But here's a Jewish person at
these protests that maybe maybe he would know
better than you, Pam Bondi. A holocaust survivor.
My message to the brave student protesters
in America is just keep doing it. Don't
give up. We are doing exactly the same,
and in the long term, we are going
to prevail. I'm out from the Jews,
many of us of Israeli origin, many of
us descendant from Holocaust survivors.
We feel a particular sense of responsibility
to stand up against the reprehensible crimes being
perpetrated in our name by the state of
Israel.
It goes on and on. There's a million
examples of people who are Jewish themselves, who
are literally telling you what's going on is
genocide. And on top of that, recognizing the
people protesting it are rightly do so. But
people like Pam Bondi are not fighting for
America. They're fighting for another country. And I
think that's transparent. And maybe they don't even
know that. Bottom line is, if you can't
recognize what she's saying is counter, like the
antithesis to our constitutional rights, then I don't
think you care
because it's transparent.
Or you decide that if you don't like
it, then that's okay to box it out.
That could just as easily spin right back
around and hit you. That's how that works.
So I'll include this again,
the long thread of Donald Trump's many different
claims of saying exactly the same thing or
saying Israel should control congress like it once
did, rightly so.
All
that this is the stuff that gets me
frustrated.
You can even have one of these videos
and yet so many people act like we
don't yeah. It's not true. Or because it's
algorithmically censored and people aren't even seeing it
despite me looking like it's being shared. Who
knows what's going on? Bottom line, he's on
video 45 times telling you that Israel's interest
matter more than America, and we don't care
because you're wrong or because you're pro I
mean, whatever.
Whatever. Lazy narrative gets laid on top of
it. I'll play just the one out of
many where he explicitly tells you we need
to get rid of those Jew haters, which,
again, I will say the same. And by
the way, or people who hate Muslims for
this for the same blunt,
broad
justification
are disgusting people.
But it's a feeling, it is a thought,
it are it's words, it is speech, and
they have a right to all of them.
There's not there the only crime comes in
when you actually are committing when you know,
committing a crime, hurting somebody, stealing from somebody.
Saying words, whether hate speak whether whatever anybody
calls hate speech, antisemitism or anything else are
not a crime.
Funny how the Republicans were the ones telling
us all that back during the woke mindset,
but now they pretend like antisemitism doesn't apply
or they won't even address the topic. Guess
what, guys? It's all in their category of
hate speech, and you fell for it.
We will remove the jihadist
sympathizers
and Jew haters. We're gonna remove the Jew
haters
who do nothing to help our country. They
only wanna destroy our country,
and we will never let the horrors of
October 7th be repeated here on Americans. We
will not let that happen, and we will
solve the problem that we have.
It's it's really not hard to understand.
You
the full clip you can watch doesn't change
it. It's all right there. So again, the
point is not it doesn't matter what you
think those are just I I agree with
you. That's disgusting. Those people are gross.
But all he's saying is that we don't
like your idea, and so we will remove
you. Just like Pam Bondi double downed on
double downed on. You are an American citizen
with American citizenship, and you have an idea
Trump doesn't like, and he's telling you
because Israel doesn't like this, you're getting out
of this country.
I just don't know how how much more
obvious that can get.
We need to start standing up to this
stuff, especially if you believe in these people.
Now again, the clip I play in the
beginning.
So I don't I'm not going into this
as in-depth as other times in the past.
But realize, if we can show you this
infiltration
through tech companies,
through
policing,
through government, through APAC, I mean, it's literally
everywhere you look, and it's not again, hear
me on this. It is not
a focus on Jewish people. It is a
focus on Zionism that has bastardized the Judaism
religion,
which is called out by Jewish people around
the world, orthodox and otherwise,
and is co opted the the conversation, has
controlled the idea, and is using them just
like they use Christian. There are more Christian
Zionists in the world today than there are
Jewish Zionists.
So hear that. When we say Zionism, it
does not mean one or the other. It
means whatever they're manipulating.
And that's the point.
And so what we're discussing here is through
the state of Israel what they're doing. And
if you can't see this, you don't want
to because this is everywhere you look.
And the people out there trying to stop
you at the last you know, one step
before the end and say, don't look. It's
the Jews. They're trying to stop you from
seeing the picture, in my opinion. Of course,
I could be wrong.
But please demonstrate how the evidence is clear.
I think it's pretty obvious you can't make
it about every single Jewish person.
So I think that answers your question.
So what he's gonna show you is that
Israelis, through their intelligence,
have
our and this is a while ago. Almost
200 agents undeclared
sprinkled across this country
according to this former CIA agent.
Now, of course, consider these lying, but realize
that the bigger picture is that we can
prove this 15 different ways over. Many others
have highlighted this, and this shows you something
alarming.
And that explains why what what we're seeing,
how it adds up,
and how everything clearly asked the question,
who
benefits?
Unusual
embassy
was unusual.
The Israeli embassy was unusual.
My very first day at the CIA, we
had a senior FBI agent
come to talk to the new higher class.
And one of the things that he said
has stuck in my mind
all of these 32 plus years.
We were talking about trying to spot spies
who were spying on us. Most
embassies here in Washington have what are called
declared officers. Those are foreign intelligence officers who
are here,
formally known to the FBI and the CIA
as intelligence officers.
This FBI agent told us at the time
that the Israeli embassy was unusual. The Israeli
embassy had 2 declared officers, 1 from Shin
Bet and one from Mossad.
And it had
187
undeclared officers
that the FBI had been able to identify
spread out all across America
in academia,
in the defense contracting industry.
I don't know how we ignore that. I
really don't understand how in the world that
something like that. And as when it's highlighted
by so many other examples or what James
Lee highlights about the ADL or what we've
covered about APAC in general or about the
history of Zionism across the board or about
what they've done to this country a 1000
ways over or the US is liberty or
the I mean, it's crazy.
How much can be ignored?
But it's coming out.
But you can see the death
what do you call death throes? You know,
the the last grasping effort to try to
make this stick. It's not, though.
As the CEO of Gab, Andrew Torba, says,
it's an interesting coincidence. Now this gets into
the idea. So we're talking about Twitter.
Right? We're talking about the social engineering, algorithmic
manipulation, the censorship, the Israeli influence on the
outcome, and now the overlap with the agenda
of technocracy that completely overlap I mean, like,
best way to say is, like, it intertwines.
It dovetails with the technocratic agenda. What Israel
is doing that's my point from before. Israel
and Zionism are a central part in the
globalist agenda that very, certain people just don't
wanna highlight.
So he says and this gets into the
idea of the XAI.
So basically, think of everything we just talked
about and how that then intertwines with the
technocratic agenda
and the
very alarming next steps we're going into. So
he says, isn't it interesting coincidence that shortly
after BlackRock invested 6,000,000,000 into XAI, which it
wasn't just XAI. I'll show you in a
second. It was some of it and other
people involved too. But BlackRock did invest in
XAI. That's important.
This platform is suddenly being transformed into a
social credit style system
where users are ranked based on vague and
subjective criteria like positivity.
At the same time, Grok is being aggressively
promoted, which it is. It's everywhere. And per
and displayed prominently on every post. Given these,
developments, it wouldn't be surprising to see a
Grok fact checking feature introduced in the near
future as well.
Interesting.
But his point is well taken. Right? The
idea that suddenly,
after this happens, we see this radical change.
Maybe that was because of BlackRock, maybe not.
But it's still a valid point to make
because I think it's a lot of
people that support Musk wouldn't want to acknowledge
that overlap.
Now, again, I posted this back on December
24th. And, again, oops,
way before that, I think, like, a week
before I did the first example of this.
The quiet transition from DARPA's XAI to Elon's
XAI.
Very clearly, quick breakdown. DARPA's program ended in
2021.
It's called explainable AI or XAI.
And then and that was and then beginning
of 2022, Elon ends up buying Twitter or
and so many months in, turn calls it
x, starts x AI, begins the same program.
No one's claiming they're connected as far as
I can see, but it is exactly the
same thing. Using social media to train the
AI. And even right now, as I showed
you a minute ago, underneath every post, or
most of them see, this one doesn't have
it. It's very weird examples. It says, explain
this post. I mean, it is the same
thing.
Same name. I mean, it's it's kind of
eerie. Right? And so we're using machine learning,
and he's telling you they're using your posts
to train this thing.
My point is that I came out with
this. And, again, Pat, you know, demonstrating our
value. If you wanna be ahead of a
story, we tend to be ahead of most
of these stories, guys. And it's not my
opinion. Look for yourself. And not just that
we're pointing to it, but that we use
the information in the hand, give you, you
know, my educated opinion on what I think
is happening. And
more often than not, it turns out to
be the what's here's what's funny, actually.
Sometimes I'll come out with a story that's
a that's ahead,
and I'll say, you know, this is what
I feel like is happening based on what
I can see. And then you get this
shooting of this this huge partisan narrative that's
different
right after that. This is the truth. And
everyone jumps on that narrative and then after
about a week, it falls down. And, oh,
look at that. It turns out what I
said at the beginning was the correct one.
Now I'm really not trying to say I'm
always right. I'm not. I've made plenty of
mistakes. But I'm just saying if you wanna
find the platform,
look at our track record. It's worthy of
I I think what we have done over
the years has been proven to be and
it's not because we're always insight. It's because
we're just objective and we wait till we
can prove something to out report it. And
sometimes that's early, and sometimes partisan fields make
that hard to see.
I think we're good at this in order
to, you know, in this sense of finding
our way through that BS.
I think that's clear. That's up for you
guys to decide. But my point is this
is far before.
A quiet transition from DARPA's XAI to Elon's
XAI.
And that black and we talk about BlackRock
and its funding. We talk about the connection
to a to Palantir, the overlap with the
drone conversation, the drone legislation,
the AI powered operations for every decision that
Palantir is pushing, their connection with Israel and
their AI use of the programs to kill
Palestinians and train that version of it. And
I don't that overlaps with a large satellite
network they're building around you and that overlaps
with the nanotech smart I mean, it's it's
wild.
Every single thing I just said, you can
literally prove.
And you would have known that last month
if you've been watching this platform. But
it's now circulating, which is I'm glad to
see. Dominic Michael simply highlighting, but with a
screenshot and very Twitter files esque type style.
Not to be critical of him, just saying
that's what has been going on. People have
fallen into this this kind of style.
BlackRock no. Like like, right there. Why wouldn't
you just take the link? Oh, oh, I
take it back. I know why. Because Twitter
has now been
they'll downrank your post if you include the
link.
How is that not about controlling the flow
of information?
They don't want you to be able to
vet stories. They don't want you to look
at hashtags and join larger conversations. They want
you to mute words and box yourself out.
I mean, it's so obvious. Oh, don't be
negative. You'll get down ranked. If all those
big accounts don't like what you said, they'll
push you to the side. That is conformity
in the most clear way ever.
Anyway
but that's my point. So it shouldn't be
against Dominic. He's just trying to be able
to get
this reach, I would argue. But you put
the link in, it's gone. Down ranked. But
I don't care. Because I'm not gonna self
censor. I'm not gonna stop falling into their
control structure. I'm gonna do what I think
is right. And it's gonna get downplayed. That's
how this works.
BlackRock made a multibillion dollar investment in xAI
in late December. Less than 2
days later, Elon Musk started restricting and suspending
verified accounts. Just pointing out the same thing.
I'm glad to see this finally getting reached,
but it's today
versus the 24th December when I made that
show.
And thank you, ailing and invader, for pointing
this out and simply so he he basically
highlighted this for me earlier. Here's another person.
See how funny see how that it cascades
through partisan media. Same person doing the same
exact thing with the same screenshot. You see
what I'm saying? BlackRock is now finding x.
But either way, I'm glad that they're pointing
to it.
It's interesting though. Just note how these controlled
flows work.
He tagged me, and I said the same
thing. Too bad the show I did about
this a week ago was suppressed as usual.
Glad it's breaking through though.
So on that point, in case you missed
it, Elon Musk's x a I, whereas the
actually, I can just grab that for you
in case you wanna
see this one. Oh, wait.
There it is. DARPA's
ex
so weird.
This is from right there, December 2021, and
it says it started in 2017,
a 4 year x AI research program.
Now it comes to an end in 2021.
That's, like, that's December 2021. Right? So right
after that is when it all starts. Read
through it yourself. It is literally what they're
doing. And it's about
explainable AI, and it's DARPA.
I think Elon is basically the face of
all most of these. And and, in a
minute, we'll go over the brain machine in
your face, which is literally the same thing.
It steps with them and they've got their
focus, that's where they're going, and then it
stops. And all of a sudden, Elon's like,
here's what I'm working on. I don't think
it's hard to see.
But you can prove that BlackRock along with
others, including Sequoia Capital, by the way, or
what was a bunch of very a group
that should stand out as concerns more than
any republicans more than anybody. But not when
it's Elon Musk.
Because literally the argument you get is, well,
you gotta get funny somewhere.
Yeah, I guess that argument only applies to
Rumble and Elon Musk and anybody else. It's
damning as hell, right?
Partisan blindness.
But I think this is super important because
it shows you that he is more than
just a military contractor. He's like the face
of rolling out these agendas, but it's also
right now being used to suppress you.
Right now and and on the heels of
being funded by BlackRock, possibly more, by the
way, because we don't know the full background.
It's weird how the whole Diddy connection to
Twitter never became a story despite what just
happened. Can you even imagine if Diddy was
involved with something that, let's say, Biden owned?
Right? Or some connection to like, it would
be everywhere.
Jones and the rest would be screaming about
it for 45 days straight because it's about
Democrats.
But you have Diddy literally invested in Twitter,
and nobody wants to talk about it. It's
no. I shouldn't say that. There's plenty talking
about it. But you know what I mean.
Plenty that are should be or would be
otherwise. Now I saw this earlier. Now, again,
I I looked at Suppressed News. I there's
there's ones I can see on his account
that have it. There's maybe nothing, but I
just think it's interesting with where this is
going. I think there's algorithmic
control
centrist, like,
social engineering.
But here's Elon Musk sharing Joe Lonsdale, and
it's got the explain AI.
Here is suppressed news, and it's not there.
Right? Here's
one from
where, oh, I thought I'd wanna mine up
there.
Let me just grab my open mind real
quick.
It doesn't matter. The point is simply that
I just you could see on the screenshot,
it's not there, you know. And I don't
know why. Maybe it's a glitch. Maybe they're
still working out the bugs. Maybe it's because
they don't want you to explain what Suppressed
News is telling you about Netanyahu in Israel
and what they're doing. I don't know. But
I think we've long past proven that this
net this platform is very creepily trying to
social engineer and hide things and censor.
I mean, almost as I think we can
all acknowledge this pretty much worse than it
was before. I hope that's becoming clear.
Now he highlights this. Oh, never mind. This
was the post. Yeah. Or then why don't
I have this? Oh, that's what it was.
Okay. So this what's interesting. So here's press
news, also talking about Israel, different post. Oh,
no. That's the same one. And then right
beneath it, some guy with a no check
mark, smaller account, but he has one.
You know, again, I mean, leave it there.
It may just be some weird thing. I
don't know. But either way, it stands out.
Aaron Day makes the large point. Whether, you
know, whatever it's about as we get before
we get into the neuro one that really
blows my mind. He simply says, the number
one enemy is technocracy. I couldn't agree more.
I believe he's gonna be at the Mexico,
event,
which again, I forgot today. I I gotta
start shout shouting that out. I've got a
a, affiliate link, by the way. I'll include
the show notes,
in regard to the people's reset if you'd
like to join us. I'd love to see
you guys there.
I believe he's gonna be there. The number
one enemy is technocracy. There are no white
knights.
And just shows Elon Musk tweets. Synthetic mRNA
is basically digital medicine with incredible potential. These
are all real, by the way. I've shown
you all these in the past. Sounds like
he doesn't realize Tesla makes the vaccine machine
for CureVac. That's mRNA.
At some point, having a Neuralink will be
normal, he says. That's, you know, Elon that's
Klaus Schwab for you right there. Elon Musk
doing the same thing. The only action needed
to solve climate change is carbon tax.
Unreal.
One of these is enough to make somebody
on the democrat side be shunned for life,
but not Elon Musk.
Now we just talked about this in a
large sense,
but from an old discussion,
this is today. Or rather, you know,
newer. So this is December 2024,
the last month.
Scientists use matrix style learning.
I don't think that means, like, what we
might expect. That's just a term for either
way, the point is matrix style learning to
quote write skills
into human brain non invasively.
No. I guess I I I take it
back. They do made it that way. I
wasn't sure if they meant the point is,
like, in the movie, like, being able to
implant
like,
stick a thing in your brain and then
come away knowing kung fu. Right?
But you know what that also means?
Exactly. This is how this always works. So
Elon comes out and goes, we're gonna make
people walk again. But, you know, also, all
the dark terrifying things that they're actually gonna
do and probably not even get to that
thing you just said. Right? That's how it
usually goes. Same thing here. So we've been
showing you the conversations over the over the
last decade of DARPA working on exactly this
through all of the people interconnected with the
COVID shot. I'm gonna show you next.
And talking about literally being able and we
just talked about James Giordano,
neuroscience, neuroweapons, being able to write
and implant memories, thoughts, fears, actions, maybe even
control your movements.
But, yeah, they're gonna go, we'll teach you
kung fu. That's fun and exciting and I
want that except not when you're completely, you
know, some zombified. Like, the point is, I
don't to take it to the extreme always
scares people away. The bottom line is let
your imagination work for you and realize that
when we're talking about writing skills in your
brain, it works in any other dynamic.
They could take away things. They could make
give you false memories. They I mean, any
number of things. This is terrifying.
And this is the world they've been building
for a long time and this dovetails with
everything they're working on right now. I'm worried
that might already be partly happening.
So we just talked about this. Again, this
this is Whitney's article for TLAB from 2020.
Coronavirus gives a dangerous boost to DARPA's darkest
agenda.
Now, this is the,
in November,
in vivo nano platforms.
This is before the shots went out large.
This is about creating platforms in your body
for like, they're nano platforms in your body
to create to then kind of work in
synergistically style with the whatever they pump into
your body. To then pump in instructions and
that can pump out what they need makes
it easy. The point is this is what
they were always building towards. This is, like,
essentially the MRA platform, but in your body.
And many other ways they could look at
this.
Or the idea of the next generation nonsurgical
nanotech
neurotechnology.
But also remember that at the same time,
DARPA or the CIA being involved with the
injections, which apparently just got broken by the
mainstream alternative media even though we talked about
that in, what, 2021? I forget what the
year was. The point,
they were involved with the shots.
But today's point is about the
n three program that we've talked about before
right here. So this is Whitney's report
on this.
So make sure you read the article. We've
gone over this many times. Here's the actual
report she's citing, and I pulled out a
couple new things I wanna show you.
So again, this is DARPA's new project,
2019.
Investing 1,000,000 in brain machine interface.
Funny how when that stopped being a focus
for them, it became Elon's focus, just like
XAI.
And the point is it didn't stop being
focused for them. It just did on the
pa on the surface. But it says, in
con so they're talking about invasive things. Right?
So they go in contrast, there's minimally invasive
technologies which allow scientists to deliver
nano transducers without surgery.
For example, an injection of a virus carrying
light sensitive sensor
or other chemical, biotech, or self assembled nanobot
that can reach individual neurons
and their and control their activity independently
without damaging sensitive tissue.
The proposed use for these technologies isn't yet
well specified,
even though it is. You could show decades
of research on this, they just don't want
you to hear it. But an an as
animal experiments have shown,
controlling the activity of a single neurons
of single neurons at multiple points is sufficient
to program artificial memories of fear,
desire,
and experiences directly into the brain.
20/2019.
K?
2024,
breaking news.
Repackaged as a fun thing. You can learn
new skills.
Always how this works.
And this gets crazy. It says final and
three deliverables will include a complete
integrated
bi directional brain machine interface system.
So final deliverables. So anybody in business knows
that means something that's tangible.
Deliverables. What can we what is what is
the end result? What do we have in
our hands? K? So this is a program
in 2019.
And we could jump ahead and show you
as they're entering phase 2 of their n
three program in 2020.
What does that mean?
Does that mean that they had a brain
machine interface system as a deliverable at the
end of n 3, which may may have
ended right after that? Or maybe it's ongoing
and that's what they're working to achieve? The
point is what Elon Musk is bringing to
the table is not the new part of
this. It is the red herring of it
all, guys. I think it's about what we're
gonna show you next. This was
because the point is we can show you
this part of it that goes back 20
years
through DARPA, through people like Charles Lieber, Bob
Langer, more so there. The current the point
is the research that prefaces or rather predates
what they're working on. Now it says, in
6 the 6 teams
will tap into 3 different types kinds of
natural phenomenon.
A communicate for communication. Excuse me. So what
they're saying is they're gonna use these teams
knowledge reads the first part saying the
the these popular technologies rely on surgery
or was it?
Anyway, I get it references further up. The
point is they have these different groups working
on it. Okay? And they're saying that we're
gonna focus on 3 different kinds of phenomenon
to to for communication with what is in
your body. K? So remember what they just
said. Virus carrying light sensitive sensitive
sensors, chemical biotech, or self assembling nanobots. Right?
They inject something, like, with a syringe, it
says right there, into your body.
A virus,
protein,
that then can read to be create the
possibility to do these things. So what they're
saying is,
now we need to find a way to
be able to do this without having a
wire sticking out of your body. Right? That
was a long time ago. They're at the
side of the 3 different ways we can
communicate.
Magnetism,
light,
or acoustic waves.
2019.
And so this is the optogenetics, the magnetogenetics.
This is what we've talked about many times.
And this is the current level of I
mean, for all we know, it's way beyond
even this. But the idea of the brain
machine interface that Elon's putting forward, again, this
is not an unpopular opinion. I think that
is completely a science that's trying to make
you think that's the level, like holding up
these big clunky chips while they have smart
dust. That's what I think it is.
So it says doctor Jacob Robinson at Rice
University, for example, is combining
genetic engineering,
infrared laser beams, and nanomagnets
for a bidirectional
system.
The $18,000,000
project called MANOA,
which stands for magnetic optical and acoustic neural
access device,
2019,
uses viruses
to deliver
2 extra genes into the brain.
Okay. Well, what else did we just engage
with that might've been able to do that?
It says one encodes a protein
that sits on top of neurons and emits
infrared light when the cell activates.
Red and infrared light can penetrate through the
skull.
Now this would arguably be something that maybe
have to be in in in, you know
well, at least direct line of sight to
be able to have a light beam that
could go that far. But realize, some of
these things can be done through other electronics
that can be done from very far away.
And it says this lets a skullcap,
embedded with light emitters and detectors,
pick up these signals for subsequent decoding.
Ultrafast and ultra sensitive photodetectors
will further allow the cap to ignore scattered
light and tease out relevant signals
emanating from the targeted protons pros portions, excuse
me, of the brain. The team explained.
The other new gene,
the other one they put in your body,
helps write commands into the brain.
This protein tethers iron nanoparticles
to the neuron's activation mechanism.
Do you know what iron nanoparticles we've discussed
before?
Ferritin nanoparticles.
That is what we're discussing.
That is the way they've been able for
those that just don't wanna believe anything other
than more mainstream media,
which I just showed, I think, the last
show
from The Guardian.
Genetically engineered magneto protein remotely controls brain and
behavior. That's the ferritin,
iron particles in your
body. And that they can use those with
outside forces. Or
the same discussion,
I think this was a couple years later.
Yeah. 1 year later from the Rockefeller Institute.
Flipping a switch in the head. With a
new technology, scientists were able to exert wireless
control over brain cells of mice with just
a push of a button. First thing they
did was make the mice hungry. And the
article tells you they could literally reduce insulin
and kill whatever they're doing this to, or
they could make you feel like you wanna
eat, or they could implant false memories, or
they could make you do anything.
This is real action. They also talk about
how they could relay the what you're seeing
back to them wherever they are. Real time
relaying of your eye information back. This is
not a joke. At the very least, they're
claiming it's real. That should matter.
So these
are things that are actually what they're oh,
that's the wrong one.
They're telling you
that this is what they've been working on.
This is before. So now we're in 2024
25. Excuse me.
So what they're telling you
is that we're using the iron particles to
be able to manipulate from the outside. So
they don't really need anything but to but
to optimize
that process.
Right? I mean, ultimately, they they just had
a mass injection process across the world
that maybe those genes they just discussed are
now put in your body.
Right?
One is
a gene. One is a
protein.
Right? One encodes a protein that sits on
top of the neurons. The other is a
gene that helps write commands in the brain.
So I don't know what else example we
have about a mass injection program. And now
the idea being that this potentially
could be able
to be the connected point between controlling those
fair nanoparticles
and in at the very least, influencing how
you think and feel. Now this is where
we get to the, James Giordano
point, and this is what the n three
program was all about.
So just so it's clear, this is not
some hypothetical thing. This is what they're telling
you they were trying to accomplish, and all
I'm doing is connecting with real world examples
that you can't deny. Not saying it means
for sure that it happened.
This protein tethers iron nanoparticles to the neuron's
activation mechanism using magnetic
magnetic coils on the headset. So this at
this point, they're testing it with the headset.
The point being, though, all you need is
an outside source. And this is 2019, and
we are 6 years later. I care my
point is the technology I've already shown you
proves this can be done from a distance.
And it's Kathaross and Fitz was just talking
about this. And it says, using the coils,
the team can then remotely stimulate magnetic super
neurons to fire while leaving others alone. Although
the team plans to start in cell cultures
and animals, their goal is to eventually transmit
a visual image from one person to another.
In 4 years,
interesting timing, we hope to demonstrate direct brain
to brain communication at the speed of thought
and without brain surgery.
We're past that point.
Now down here it says, but these electrical,
optical, acoustic, magnetic, and genetic
genetic brain machine interfaces,
as crazy as they sound, seem inevitable.
Then it says, DARPA is preparing for a
future in which a combination of unmanned systems,
AI, and cyber operations may cause conflicts to
play out on timelines
that are too short for humans
to effectively manage with current technology alone.
Wow.
I mean,
this I mean, bottom line is this is
they're making this a foregone conclusion.
I don't know about you, but that's not
that is not a future that I want
personally.
So
I wanna quickly go over some of these
now the what you're seeing here is a
video with James Giordano
from the, I believe, the state department and
other interconnected points are in the government.
He's a he's a expert on neuroscience.
Now you can watch this,
the video itself. But all I wanna do
is show you some of the the
slides that he's showing while he's talking about
this. Just really quickly.
Combat operations. And I and I want you
to think about the connection to today. Not
just the broad sense. Like, every one of
these things will connect to something today. But
immediately what we're dealing with right now.
Combat operations. Novel neuroweapons.
Drugs and bugs, he says. In close pharmaceuticals
and organic neurotoxins.
Ultra low dose, high specify agent
for use in targeting
diplomatic and local culture,
hearts and minds scenario.
Like, the outcome being to affect
opinions, thoughts, anger, sadness.
It says high morbidity, neuromicrobiologic
agents. Now all these things he's arguing that
they're doing. Like, he he's he had a
video that came out, like, last year that's
saying, like, guys, this is now. Like, they're
doing this stuff.
Scary. Now, of course, remember, he works for
the government, so we should not just go,
it's the truth because he said it and
this is something we think. Question it even
more because he's trying to tell you, but
don't disregard it because there's a lot of
evidence.
Neuro microbials
with high neuropsychiatric
symptom clusters
for public panic,
public health. Like, do you not realize how
we're seeing this, like, weird social contagion just
keep spinning out of control? It's very weird.
And we all see it more now than
ever.
It says, gene edited micro microbiologics
with novel morbidity
mortality profiles.
Nano
neuroparticulate
agents.
High aggression lead carbon silicate nanofibers.
Network disruptors.
These are, like, im like, it's such a
subtle thing, like, being able to pump this
stuff in front of a crowd, let's say,
and have them all start fighting each other.
Or, like, this is stuff he talks about.
And I know that sounds crazy to some
people, but realize, at the very least, they're
working on this.
He's telling you it's now. And last one,
neurovascular
hemorrhage, hammer, hemorrhagic agents
for in close and population use as stroke
epidemic
induction agents.
Guys, there's so many examples to make right
there. I mean, this is this all these
things are coming to a head right now.
And I think we're there these are there
is there's his name. James Giordano, PhD.
Combat operations, continued. Neuro weapons, devices,
Neuro sensory
immobilizing agents, UAV, drone, insect. Like, I think
a lot of this stuff is happening right
now.
Trans and intracranial
pulse simulators. Again, with the talk I'm talking
about the internal stuff, the introduction of the
injections that were given. Who knows?
Neural network disruptors, confusion generators,
handheld,
UAV, drone, and insect born. Right? So what
he's saying is you can have things that
might that could be put in you. You
could have this could be done by a
drone. It could be done by an insect
born concept like a mosquito.
All very real concepts that he's telling you.
Neuro ops, altered reality tactics,
really needs to stand out, I think.
Core, it says, courscial
coupled neural temporal function
alteration, time warpers.
Pharma, psychological,
neurostimulation
induced, cognitive, emotional disruption.
That's kinda what what Catherine's talking about. And
and even more. My point is is what
we're seeing, people that are denying what's going
on, these kind
of rabidly emotional emotion driven
I think we're watching this. I think Twitter
is a s is I think this is
where it's being done. I think we're watching
this all play out right now. Just my
gut.
And then he goes on to tell you
specific. DARPA, again, that's you can't miss this
all ties back to the milk government, you
know, but DARPA in particular, but just got
intelligence.
Dragonfly,
beetles, cyborgs. Like, these have been around. These
kind of concepts have been around for a
long time.
Yeah. And then it says, access and manipulate
neural systems, brains to win hearts and minds.
See, neuro,
same thing. Like this is the neuroscience stuff
like the technology the the the weaponized aspect
on the world stage.
Global neuro ST economic predictions 2020.
That's interesting. Oops.
And still plan. Interesting, by the way.
Predictions 2020. I keep I I I can't
be missed how many things seem to have
connected on that date.
The end of the, the at least the
phase 2 of the n 3 program itself.
May and what is and by the way,
let's think about that actually.
What is the usual
phase 3
of a program?
Or even phase 2 for that matter.
Real world examples or at least actual, not
study, not lab, but people.
So if we're talking about phase 2 or
phase 3, which by the way, we're in
2025 right now. I think we have to
at least consider that means
it's being done to you,
like they've done
countless times before.
And what they're saying is this is the
world stage
predictions for 2020.
I'm just going to make sure it wasn't
what I was missing. So many different slides
to look at.
Advances to phase 2 of the n three
program. Now,
Alan McLeod just simply points out a business
insider post that says and he goes, this
is about as ominous as it gets. Here's
billionaire
Larry Ellison says the vast
AI fueled surveillance system,
not like he's acknowledging anyone that's being built
right now by all the people fighting for
your freedom. No. No. No. Just hypothetically, if
one should exist somewhere in the future,
He's saying an AI fueled surveillance system can
ensure, quote,
citizens will be on their best behavior.
Wow.
I mean, yeah. That this is the kind
of elitist mindset of the billionaire class like
Elon Musk. He knows better. Trust him. It's
paternalism.
And I said, as Elon builds the world's
largest spy satellite network with US intelligence,
literally quoted by the NRO, now you can't
hide because you're constantly being looked at.
I mean, it's ridiculous, guys. These people are
seeding this out in a very rapid way,
and too many people are
falling
for
it.
And here's the article itself. And here, in
case you've missed it, this is the director
of the National Reconnaissance Office literally telling
you, now you can't hide because you're being
constantly looked at. And this is what it
looks like. I mean, here, this is the
video of the
reality of the SpaceX satellite distribution. This is
2020 right now. Just jumping ahead. That's today,
right there.
It's only gonna get worse. That's terrifying.
And now they're telling you, well, now you
can't hide. You're looked at everywhere. What do
other countries think about this?
This is your technocracy. This is your pent
tectocratic panopticon.
And David Icke was telling you with the
interconnection with that, and the idea of the
the cloud, the smart dust dynamic, or nanotech.
This is terrifying to me.
Now, you don't have to believe it all.
K?
Question it, please. I hope I'm wrong.
But if any part of this is is
is proof I I think a lot of
this is provable, then we really need to
start rearrange re we need to start reconsidering
what we're pushing back against and how we're
standing right now. Whether reconsider our political alignments,
reconsider everything, or whether your political alignments even
matter anymore.
It's important to think about this. And I'm
not trying to challenge ideas or like, that's
how these things usually get framed. Like, oh,
he's he's shilling for the dem democrats secretly.
No. They're just as bad, guys.
It's about any of it. Whether your political
leaning should have more importance to you
than
your than your neighbor, whatever side they're on,
or the fact that you can see those
same political sides hiding from the things that
you wanna call. Recognize that this, in my
opinion, what David Icke is highlighting, is coming
unless we do something about it. And you
know why that's clear? Because they're effing telling
you that. They're openly saying this in many
different ways.
David Icke says, this is the world that
the Trump Musk regime intends to advance
so fast on the Chinese model with Musk's
billionaire mate, David Sachs, running AI policy. He
is.
This is what the MAGA hijack is all
really all about, and my goodness, how so
many have fallen for it. Time to wake
up fast.
Here's the video.
And it it says the following film has
been classified as disinformation by the Ministry of
Truth. Any sharing of these materials may result
in penalties such as fines and or imprisonment.
Our favourite stories of the future
show the ascent of humanity.
Beyond sickness,
beyond conflict,
beyond
the stars,
and even beyond mortality.
But what if all of our stories of
the future
were wrong?
The assumption
is that we will be there to see
it.
Today, we live in disparate perceptual worlds,
where some can clearly see
what others cannot.
The 4th industrial
revolution,
giving birth to global technocracy.
Elite masters
transcending
geopolitical boundaries,
acting with impunity,
celebrating
our descent into bio digital slavery.
Even those who understand where we are right
now, may not yet perceive
where we are heading.
So what is the trajectory of humanity?
Right now, we find ourselves
accelerating
exponentially towards the post human world.
How do we bridge our disparate worlds and
raise the alarm? Press pause and look again
at the world around us, on the cusp
of the 4th industrial
revolution,
hopelessly
addicted to technology.
They tell us that artificial intelligence, virtual reality,
genetic engineering, nanotechnology,
synbio, are all here for us to exploit,
to set us free from evolution,
and become as gods.
But as we reach into technology,
technology
also reaches into us.
We have surpassed the internet of things
and entered the internet of bodies,
merging humans with machines
run by AI.
Trans humanism is the transformation of the human
species
that continues to evolve with and through technology,
bringing us to a threshold,
the singularity.
After the singularity,
earth becomes a post human world
where human beings will be rendered obsolete.
How far fetched is the post human world?
The enabling technologies exist.
The policies are in place,
sophisticated
military operations are already underway.
COVID 19 was a sial.
The intention was never the disease,
it was always
the injection,
the normalisation
of compulsory injected bionano enhancement.
Now, the traces of bionano technology are showing
up everywhere in live blood analyses.
There, global technocracy is rising up all around
us and within us, whether we like it
or not.
This
is Omnior,
and they think they have won.
Every day, they tighten the screws, surveillance,
censorship,
distraction,
subversion.
We need to be prepared
for the most shocking of futures.
But the story of our future
is not yet written.
In this vital moment, we still have time
to choose.
They have chosen their way to depart this
world,
but we will not comply.
We are the resistance,
humanity's response to the 4th industrial revolution.
We will choose our own way, and we
must defend our freedom of choice, whatever the
cost may be. Resistance
means holding on to our humanity.
If you do not change direction, you may
end up where you are heading.
So choose wisely.
What's left with your time,
starts,
and
Now it's obviously
alarming,
but I challenge you to find one aspect
of that that is not backed up by
what's going on. Now you could disagree with
the idea of what the shot did or
what they might be trying to do. But
my point is exactly like David is highlighting,
every single element of what he's saying, whether
or not you think that's the objective or
whether they've come to fruition or whether they're
all being rolled out
is provable, at least on the sense that
they're telling you that's what the plan is
in in separate parts.
It's very, very clear. Now I'm not talking,
like, let's say, the plan is to secretly
inject you. They're not saying that. My point
is that you can see the evidence around
the idea of, let's say, the ferret nanoparticle
dynamic or the idea of self spreading vaccines
or the idea of the cloud and the
and the the opto magnetogenetics
and the different ways they can control and
influence the cloud. The the it's very clear
these things are coming to fruition.
So outside of the
outcome that he sees from it all,
and let's just even say he's wrong. Is
that still the world that you want? As
this is I mean, this is not even
being discussed. Like, you know, the allude let's
be clear. The illusion of some kind of
democratic process, I think, is rapidly falling apart.
And it's not that we shouldn't want that,
and rather just we should want some kind
of representative government. Or rather, to be clear,
what we should want is no government at
all. But if we're forced to live in
this dynamic, the idea of being some kind
of representative government where we actually have a
say, the point is even that today is
falling so far outside. Like, what they're showing
you is that, look. We you know, did
we vote for this? Are we asking for
these things? No. They're saying we have to
because China or because it's the world, this
way it's going, or because it's bet it's
our it what national security.
Okay. Fine. Even if they mean those things,
all it really shows you is they're you
know, you have influence unless,
except when I say these words, when we
don't like it, when suddenly it means you
never had influence to begin with, I think
that's what we need to start recognizing. Is
that if there's a caveat,
eventually it becomes the whole thing. And I
think that's how every governor the whole I
mean, the, you know, you give a mouse
a cookie joke. I mean, do they ask
for a glass of milk if you don't
remember that book. The point is simply that
if you give them an inch, they'll take
a mile and I think that's by design.
Now, unfortunately, guys, I do
I have I was planning to go a
lot longer today but I have something that
just came up that I actually have to
I'm not ending right now but I just
wanna let you know that I'm probably gonna
have to go through some of this last
part a little bit faster than I wanted
to.
Ultimately, and if and whatever I may not
get to, I'm gonna follow-up on. But to
come off that point that I think is
important and I was gonna get into next.
And frankly, I don't think this deserves as
much time as it's because of how transparent
this all is, is the conversation of that
Sean Ryan podcast and the overlap with what
happened in New Orleans and in Las Vegas.
But first, what we just talked about. Right?
What he's discussing, what James g O'Donnell's highlighting,
the the the the re the information they're
showing you
is exactly what this is at least might
put it this way. They're proof they're talking
about stuff that overlaps with, like, actual mind
control.
Now you could argue that's not possible or
lying about it. Fair enough. Maybe right.
But just realize that's what they're talking about.
As much as they try to frame it
different ways, they're talking about being able to
implant memories, thoughts, fears,
you know,
what was the other one? Yeah. Bottom line,
being able to actually, as I showed you
in those articles, or I they do if
you wanna read them, being able to move
your
have real live action.
Control what you do and think.
And your arm movements and your eye like,
these are real stuff they're talking about anyway.
Potentially, to the point of having somebody carry
out an act. Right? That's what I'm getting
at.
That should not be something that's like, that's
just so crazy. They're telling you that's what
they are that's that's my point.
So when we realize what we just saw
and how even though you have these people
still kind of, like, clumsily trying to keep
it at the immigration Muslim attack country kinda
dynamic,
everyone's beginning to recognize there's a whole lot
more to this story. So first of all,
recognize those that are just hell bent on
maintaining the narrative. You know, the people that
used to be the ones at least claiming
to challenge the government narrative are now screaming
to fight for that narrative. But airport shooting
suspect Esteban Santiago sought help for mental problems
according to his brother. 2017.
Now this is interesting.
Brian Santiago said his brother went to the
FBI to say he was hearing voices about
the CIA
and ISIS,
but he was only held in treatment for
4 days. Now this story is horrifying because
all it's really gonna get into is the
idea that we're talking about somebody who's dismissed
as crazy because he's being
he's claiming that he's
being influenced
to join ISIS, which were then arguably used
to
exactly like we're seeing today.
Now, of course, you could be crazy, but
let's also be very, very real about this
for those that mean like, if you're still
the person out there pretending the fluoride's gonna
make your teeth better or that there's no
such thing as geoengineering, then you're not gonna
care about this. The point is those things
are very obviously the opposite.
Everyone it's it's proven because they're telling you
that today. My point though is that the,
voice of god device, for example, or the
heart attack gun, these are verifiable things.
These are things that they've shown you that
their the voice of god is a device
that was able to project voices into your
brain from a from a distance away.
Look it up. It's it's not something that
is fake. So the question is, is that
part of what's happening here?
But see, the most people can't even accept
that first part.
So this is something we should consider. Now
take this to the level of 2025
And Smart Dust and Nanotechnology and whatever else
we're discussing or the injections we were all
given or maybe something was triggered. Ask yourself
whether that played a factor then or with
what we're seeing. With a guy who randomly
does with nothing that really adds up decides
to, at least we're told, put an ISIS
flag on his truck.
Or that they both did this simultaneously, rented
from the same location, and both used EV
vehicles and both I mean, it's just you
can't ignore all of this. One of them
being a white guy, both from Fort Bragg.
And people that know the background are saying
this guy was not a Muslim. It just
it doesn't make any sense unless there was
something else that happened here.
Or that's the narrative and we're being misled
about something else, and we don't, oh, question
everything while considering all possibilities.
Now bringing this into the conversation about
the I mean, this is a continuing part
of this, but the next set of this
was about the cyber truck overlap. They said
their news covered something that was actually I
think it was, 404 media. I mean, this
is, again, the the kind of thing we're
talking about. The the surveillance state butting into
the technocracy state. This is Elon Musk uses
Cybertruck explosion to show Tesla can remotely unlock
and monitor vehicles, which shouldn't surprise anybody.
We saw that with the vault 7 release
leases and the idea that people could be
killed by remote driving
through that that exact dynamic. But it was
more than just being able to control, which
by the way, we should already know by
now. But shut it off, lock you in
the car, turn on the 1,000,000 cameras that
are always looking at you. I mean, this
is crazy that we ever ignored how invasive
all that is. The same people talking about
the government spying are literally going, yay, Cybertruck.
It's crazy.
Or the same people talking about,
I mean, it's, you know, here's a Cybertruck
that literally does all that, but it's good
because Elon. You know? Here's a phone that
is literally the opposite of what we're claiming
it is, but that's the MAGA phone, so
it's all good. It's security. No, it's not.
It is literally
they're just using your beliefs to trick you
into what we're telling you is coming, but
making you think it's the opposite.
And it just says the fact that the
CEO of a car company or someone working
on its behalf can and did remotely unlock
a specific vehicle and has the means of
tracking its location as well as what Musk
described as the vehicle's
telemetry is not surprising given everything we've learned
about newer tech vehicles and but it's terrifying
to me.
Now Joe Quinn has a breakdown here
of specifically
Matthew Livels,
Livelsburger.
Interesting points. Simply saying more details have emerged
that didn't makes it and it continues to
not really add up. Simply saying he would
divorce from his first wife.
At some point thereafter, he remade he remarried
this woman and had a child. Not sure
why that's relevant, but it says he was
or maybe because he had a kid. That
matters if he you know, why he would
do this. He was most recently a special
forces sergeant in the army with, within the
special forces operational attachment. It says from all
the data, it seems he was working in
on Ukraine frequently in country, probably focusing on
drone tech, interesting overlaps all of them, and
development against Russian forces. As per his LinkedIn
post a few months ago, he was promoting
a recently retired special forces medical sergeant,
promoted to to an advertisement,
to an advertisement for 1 on the platform.
It says,
text to his new girlfriend shows he had
rented a Cybertruck. So right there stands out
to me. Like, why would that's why maybe
maybe if you knew you were gonna kill
yourself, if that's what happened, which doesn't seem
to really add up. But why would you
post that?
Seems weird. Right? Doesn't seem like somebody's planning
to do that, posting it to his girlfriend.
And I also told her that he's building
drones in his new position. Like, doesn't sound
like somebody who would do that. Sounds like
somebody who might have been, you know, hijacked
to do that if you're gonna play it
what we just talked about.
Now it says he took the long route
to Las Vegas from Colorado. Left images showing
his direct route. Show left images over here
shows direct route. Right image shows the one
he took.
So he just decided to go a long
way. Each location, he stopped at to make
a to recharge.
One of the stops was a different,
Las Vegas in New Mexico.
He allegedly shot himself for the 45 caliber
Desert Eagle before the Cybertruck exploded.
If that is the case,
there's a little chance by the way, that
does make I hate when it does that.
It it it's it doesn't make much sense
seeing as how the gun was apparently, like,
melted, which I'm not even sure if that's
possible with what we're talking about with what
was it? I mean, wasn't the high level
explosives they're pretending it was Or that his
ID somehow magically didn't burn? Or that the
body apparently was super burned, but that doesn't
line up with what what the explosion was
or a fire inside of a car. I
mean, it it just like everything else. As
as always though, there could be something you
fit in that makes it all add up.
Just like we saw with the the the
assassination of Trump. There's a lot that just
left up in the air because people are
more interested in the narratives,
and that's what they're okay with today. They
want that from you. But it's a sound
that there's no video of the Cybertruck arriving
at the hotel. What you see here is
it driving through
and leaving,
which does seem interesting.
Why wouldn't there be any evity, evidence of
it other than exploding?
And it says other than the explosion itself,
we have seen only partial video. Why how
does that possibly make sense?
So the body found inside the truck was,
quote, burned beyond recognition, which again, that that
doesn't add up. I don't understand how that
makes sense. The local police were, until recently,
not sure the deceased of the truck was
Matthew Littlesburger until
both his army ID and passport were magically
found in the truck but not burned, and
you could read them.
And I I agree. That just seems pretty
damn flimsy to me. But that doesn't necessarily
have to mean that we know that he
wasn't involved. Like, I'm simply thinking about the
point of how this card what's what we're
discussing.
It does seem to add what makes what
makes sense that this person was used
because everything else in the light just doesn't
seem to make sense.
Now it says footage of police. This is
Mario Nafal saying footage of police performing CPR
on the New Orleans attacker.
And this was,
forget his name off the top of my
head. The darker skinned gentleman that was the
one that was being called a Muslim attacker.
And you all you can see is them
doing CPR outside the truck. So you can
see the truck right there. Okay?
It's strange. Right? So here they are doing
CPR in this guy,
which I do agree is odd when you
when's the last time you saw that? They
shoot a tear what they're believe he was
a terrorist, and maybe he was.
And then they try to save him. I
just I'm not used to seeing that in
most cases.
But so, Morgan comes in with an important
point.
So here's the truck. It's day it's daytime.
So at 12 at 2:0:3 AM, the suspect
was seen dressed like a boss, he says.
And these are this has even reported by
most mainstream articles. So here he is walking
down in this is on, somewhere in New
Orleans
with a trench coat, apparently wearing MetaGoogle
glasses,
like AI glasses. That's what they're all reporting.
Okay?
So here he is, the next morning in
fatigues. Now he definitely could have changed somewhere,
but
it says,
walking on, this is that street in New
Orleans. No evacuation called. It says it says
by 3:30 AM,
the suspect had grown a significant beard.
Okay. That is a good yeah. I mean,
it's hard to tell. You could argue that
it looks the same, but they're saying the
beard looks bigger in the video or in
in the image of the next day. Gained
£40, which again, you know, it's hard to
tell. These are you could think for yourself
on this.
And changed into mismatched military fatigues without buttoning
up his shirt. Afterward, he lay in the
street for several hours until daybreak as it
now that's the point that I think is
interesting. The rest of it, you could argue
that they just are, you know
it's hard to tell with an angle video
and, you know, whatever else. But so here
they are giving him CPR in the middle
of the night.
Right?
And we're to believe that in the it's
daytime,
and he's still laying there?
Oh, really? There's not I don't see any
crimes. I mean, what the f is going
on there? That these things stand out. Maybe
something makes it make sense that does not
make sense to me right now with what
we have in front of us.
Now what's interesting, by the way, more to
Twitter sit quick dance back to Twitter censorship.
K. Here's Morgan's post.
Here's Kate saying, okay. That's that is pretty
weird. Right? So have I not had the
direct link to her post?
This is what it would look like.
Isn't that telling?
Why is that?
It's not there. Right? Go back.
That's his. 1 below.
Unavailable.
So the point is, somebody on Twitter decided
they don't want you to see that. And
so it's unavailable. Unless you have the direct
link, because it's technically there. That's the kind
of censorship that you don't even see. Right?
So we post a tea lab show. Wonder
why I get such low views. Well, I
can see it on my end. Here's the
link. You click it. You can see it.
But other people look passing by, and they
go, what's that? I can't see it.
Or whoever else.
There's so much censorship on this platform. It
kills me that people pretend it's not happening.
It's right there in front of you. So
what about that point do they not want
you to see? Or always could just be
a glitch. That is genuinely always possible. But
I'm just simply saying it's pretty clear that
there is censorship.
Then this person simply adds a point. Now
this ridiculous part of it really stood out
to me more than ever. And I'll I'll
include this again since it really is an
interesting overlap.
The Orlando shooter, if you remember that, we
covered that all the way back then where
it was same kind of overlap, the Muslim
shooter dynamic. The point is simply they
the video show I don't think I have
embedded. They showed this video.
Oh, technically, this was Carrie Weather that wrote
this.
That where there was, like, in so called
journalists, like, going through the house. Like, before
this, like, the day it was happening. There's
people in there investigating and they're, like, walking
through with cameras, and they're, like, oh, look.
It's a it's his ID and a Quran
on the table. No joke. I'm not claiming
they put them there. Claiming that was just
organically there. This is the kind of lazy
Israeli propaganda we've become accustomed to that I
think is seeding into this country.
Point is, this is the same thing happening
now in my opinion.
I'll include that for you to watch.
So if you saw that, this is supposedly
New York Post.
But this my opinion is just is this
point just carrying out Israeli propaganda for them.
Ridiculous. This woman goes, we're gonna walk in
and see this. And then, oh my god.
Look, it's a chemical bomb station. Oh, it's
a Quran open on the table. Oh my
gosh. It's just so it's ridiculous.
And this person first just points out, well,
no Muslim would leave the Quran open. And
I've heard that many times by the way.
Apparently, it's really that's something that no Muslim
no practicing Muslim would do because it's supposed
to be something that is,
you know, disrespectful to god or whatever the
logic is. I've read that many times in
the past. When you come across an orgy
of evidence, be suspicious, he says. I agree
with that.
Now Patrick simply says about this and nails
it. So the media's this media stunt more
or less proves that New Orleans was 100%
an op. If there were a real criminal
case, then this so called journalist
just just spoiled the crime scene and tampered
with CIS CSI evidence
in an active FBI terrorism investigation. How often
do we hear that? Ongoing investigation. It goes
on for, like, a month. They don't even
give us information,
let alone let you walk through a crime
scene. I mean, it's just embarrassing.
And that means everyone else is involved, guys.
New York Post,
like, the people at the crime scene, the
local police. How do you explain that? It
says CNN hacks did the exact same thing
after Sam Bernardino. Now that's what we're talking
about. That's what I just showed you.
Those of us paying attention knew this. I
repeat this is an op. Likely designed to
trigger re up of end the National Defense
Authorization Act, deployment to fight ISIS in Syria
and Iraq. That's all coming through Trump, guys.
They are teetered. They're teeing it up for
Trump. America, you are being played.
He includes a film he just put out
on the 3rd and simply says, it was
a false flag operation, which appears to have
been carried out by the US government.
Not just Biden, mind you, that's the game
they want you. It's the that is the
your government left and right of it all.
Yeah. Also, this is, I'll just include this
thread from before simply telling you,
based on not just this event, but going
back in history about the many different stage
terror attacks, the FBI, and so on.
Now, rapidly, just wanna point out. I mean,
this is all I did. I I was
there's I was not doing a show that
day out of the stuff. I was trying
to get some things out. I didn't have
time. I just wanna make sure you guys
saw my thought on it, which was face
palm. I mean, really, that I mean, like,
I I would if I thought there's nuance
to this, I would have not posted that
or given your insight. To me, this was
such a transparent,
subjective, assumptive, lurching, intelligence driven
it was so obvious.
Just my opinion though. Right? But my but
the bottom line is if you watch this,
it was
everything about it was
subjective.
Trust me. I got an email. I saw
this. It turns out after the fact, I
looked back and, you know, and and then
all the information on Iran, the ced all
pro Israel US intelligence agendas.
And then, I mean, literally, guys, in the
middle of the interview, wait. Let's see if
I got an email. Oh my god. I
got one too. Like,
I mean, I felt bad for them,
genuinely.
And that's what he says. Sean Ryan is
the first unequivocal cringe of 2025.
But, you know, I Iain Carroll came out
and said, woah. This is the first. I
mean, it's basically said, don't believe it outright
though. Think think first. He did. But, you
know, I'm still comfortable, but he has come
he the last the next thing he came
on to do was basically highlighting that which
a lot of people are pointing out that
apparently
the the way that the the email they're
showing lines up, it proves apparently that it
was one being written and not being sent,
which, I mean, apparently right now, this whole
thing is just completely falling apart to the
point to where they've already changed the narrative.
So that speaks to Sean Ryan's lack of
due diligence. That speaks to this guy seeding
narrative that maybe he believes. I don't know.
But are seemingly coming from intelligence. I mean,
that aren't rude. I mean, it's it's bad,
guys. And James Li responds by saying, how
convenient does the 2 January 1st incidents
point to war on behalf of our ally
Israel and an escalation of tensions with our
biggest adversary, China. Right? Good on you for
calling it out. But again, Ian's saying it's
a big deal, but he's he expresses skepticism
in this, but I don't let you know.
It it's still giving it a lot of
reach.
And it did, guys. I mean, this went
wildly viral. 13,000,000 views being supported by everybody.
All the big you know, Trump and Elon
and everything. And this is what we're talking
about.
And there was people that were pointing out
all sorts of things about these. Bottom line
is he's still doubling down on it.
But here, you know, with a great share
of something from September 27th, and this is
the same guy. K?
He says, former Navy Seal, Sean Ryan, warns
Joe Rogan that the Taliban is funneling terrorists
into US through the southern border with plans
for October 7th time. Same thing, guys.
And let's not forget that he is former
CIA as well.
It says, please remember the history of the
last 25 years and recognize this for it.
For, recognize
this for it is repackaged neocon slop brought
to you by former spooks to get you
to surrender your remaining freedoms in the name
of fighting the war on domestic terror with
consent and by the way, that becomes the
overlap we've always talked about. Right?
Not just it's doma it's internal, but we're
talking about implanted is, you know, for it's
the vanilla ISIS dynamic.
What we tell they're telling you, they don't
give up on these things. Now it becomes
the MAGA terrorist working with the Al Qaeda
embeds, despite the fact that you guys think
you're pointing to this. They're setting you up.
That's the been the plan.
With consent manufactured via the American Gladio style
op using the same effing CIA boogeyman as
2,001 to 2,003.
And, again, did we already forget
the reality
of the I mean, Infowars just told you.
At least half the story, it's an American
proxy. It's an Israeli American proxy for the
full picture.
So interesting how they're claiming, look. We told
you. ISIS and Al Qaeda are US proxies,
but then go on to make the story
that they're embedded in this country, and it's
Muslims from the outside. That's what they're doing
right now. Immigration, the jihad, take over the
okay. Then why don't you point how so
if you wanna tell us you see it,
then why don't you connect the dot when
it matters?
The bottom line, guys, is this is about
trying to convince you that we have
we we like, it's exactly what Whitney just
said. Going back to the state we're we're
taking steps backward
for the interest of a foreign country, for
the interest of the government that seems to
be run by that foreign country currently in
this country. And, ultimately,
convincing you that we need to go after
ourselves.
I mean, it's crazy. And that begins with
the mass deportation where they focus on
anybody that they apparently wanna tell you might
be suspected of being there illegally. Now we're
gonna get into a point in a minute
about his financial contra conflicts of interest in
regard to that mass deportation.
Right? Don't hurry up, though. But so the
point is, ultimately, they'll stop forget.
Talking about this exact dynamic, it only matters,
it seems, to certain team sport politics when
it when it doesn't relate to Israel.
This was January 28th. Suspected terrorist at the
Texas border works for Assad.
The right came out screaming about this guy
who claimed he was from Palestine.
Why do you think he did that?
Until it got exposed that he was actually
working for Mossad. Now I I haven't I've
pointed this out many times, but just because
I haven't gone back to it in a
while, here, thank you to
Francisco for pointing it out. First of all,
recognize Oreo Express
has a post that's now been limited on
x. Why is that?
Here's what it says. When terrorists enter the
country illegally now my point at the time
was, wait a minute. They're on the other
side of the border. They haven't even attempted
to cross the border yet. So how do
you know they're illegally entering or entering at
all? Or terrorists. Because, guys, there was a
clear narrative here. It was about the same
thing we're seeing today.
Nonetheless, the point is, are we really gonna
pretend that they limit the post because they
call people terrorists?
Seriously? Do you realize how many posts right
now on MAGA huge posts or small accounts
are calling any brown person, any any immigrant,
a terrorist, an Islamic Jihad Muslim right now?
Or Israel focused doing the same thing about
Palestinians? My point is this isn't being reduced
in my opinion because it's violation of the
rules. They don't care about that. They're letting
it happen everywhere on this platform right now.
It's being suppressed, I think, because it's showing
you something they don't want to be seen.
That's my opinion. And it it's because of
what I'm showing you right now.
Because he comes up and goes, it's actually
he's a a Jordanian engineer named Bashar Abu
Saeed who was imprisoned in Egypt
for recruiting for Assad.
Whoops. And here's the actual article. We went
over all this way more in-depth in the
show we, the link I have over there.
Egypt sentences Jordanian engineer for 10 years for
espionage.
Okay? So the point is that you can
have this conversation, but the moment that it
gets revealed that it's actually Israel seeding through
agents through our border, the whole conversation gets
shut down, Twitter censors it, we move forward.
That's the reality.
So when they're right now telling you all
this stuff about the border, recognize that they
don't really care about that. They care about
using that to get you in a certain
position.
So David and I comments on this. Here's
Sean Ryan doubling down on all this. He's
saying his family's gonna disappear for a few
days and, you know, very weird what all
this is. And he says and I think
they're just trying to curate hype around it.
He's saying, aren't you a former US Navy
SEAL and CIA contractor, Sean? Yes. He is.
Isn't Sam Schomat a guy who interview interviewed
about the Vegas Cybertruck, an intelligence officer and
chief warrant officer
to US Army, retired? Should we therefore accept
everything said without question, asking for a friend?
Michael O'Neil says, Sean starts that episode by
saying
none of this is a 100% verified.
He says, he said it multiple times in
different words. All you have to do is
not be retarded. That's what the guy says.
You see how ridiculous this is? So are
we really pretending like this isn't being taken
at face value by the huge portion of
the conversation?
So what he's trying to do is it
makes it better that he starts off by
going, we can't prove any of this, then
tears into a thing where everybody takes it
at face value. That makes you stupid, Michael.
That makes you part of the problem. That
you're trying to shout down somebody for criticizing
how that's happening
instead of you going how dumb it is
that we even did this show when we
can't prove any of it.
And now it's all falling apart. So I'm
sure he doesn't feel as good about this
now, making fun of him for calling out
what turned out to be the case. My
point, though, is that this is a problem
with the with the field. People that are
partisan will choose to act like
disclaimer. I might be lying about all of
it. And then going into a 4 hour
show about things that you then take at
face value,
it makes it okay that I gave you
a disclaimer and then no. That's stupid.
This is not what you should be doing.
And if you're gonna say you didn't know
if you can verify it, why then did
you jump up and go, I got an
email too? Well, you just said you couldn't
verify anything. So how do you know it's
real?
Obviously, you know what's happening here, guys. This
is an engineered game. And as Connor Freeman
points out, if a former CIA contractor in
quotes
with an ex inexplicably
massive media following, almost a million, by the
way, has an intelligence officer in quotes on
his show to scare you to death of
Iranian manpads shooting American planes out of the
sky,
you should
assume the government isn't thinking about shooting planes
down. You the government is thinking about shooting
planes down and blaming Iran. Now I wouldn't
say you should assume. I would simply say
you should strongly consider.
Right? And same point.
If they're
going, they're gonna do this. Consider whether they
wanna do it to blame them.
Historically,
he's right. That's usually what happens.
Look back for yourself.
But don't assume that's important but consider.
Now here's an interesting addition to this.
Now what's funny about this I think Sam
Tripoli shared this. And, people went crazy. Oh,
you're buying. You what a loser take. All
this different stuff. Why? Just because this guy
appears to be someone who supports the jab
and calls someone a conspiracy theorist. It's ultimately
only relevant
insofar you might think that he has lack
of logic in certain like, he might miss
something. Because clearly, if he still thinks these
shots are good, then he might but guess
who else does? Donald Trump. Well, well, forgive
him for that, for he, Chas and all.
But my point though is that listen to
what he's saying. This guy's claiming he's got
technological
information around how he knows that that guy
speaking to Sean and Sean are lying to
you. And all people can hear is what
gives them the reason to ex to dismiss
it. I'm not blindly taking it to face
value. I'm considering it while considering that maybe
he's missing something, but also maybe that he
has some truth to it before we until
we get more information. Here's what he says.
Nope. That's not the one.
That was the long video, by the way.
I had that pulled up, but just in
case it was not the main thing. But,
oh, there it is. Sorry.
Looking too far ahead. Here we go. And
this guy, Sam Shumate, are lying to you.
This guy, Sam Shumate, runs this conspiracy theory
account called terminal CWO.
I actually caught him last year spreading fake
emails that that claimed US pilots weren't getting
enough flight hours because all the money was
being sent to Ukraine. He's your typical garden
variety conspiracy theorist. Now here's the point right
there, first of all. Now what he's saying
is he can prove that he did fake
emails. Now if that matters to you, the
rest of it ultimately shouldn't be enough to
dismiss it. Now, again, you can consider that
if he's willing to dismiss other things that
we think are real, then maybe he would
be confused or wrong about this or played
by somebody else. That's valid. But what he's
telling you is that he's saying and he
goes on to show you stuff. Take don't
take it to face value. But I think
what we're seeing in a large sense is
clearly that this has been shown to be
false. What he's telling you is that he
can prove going back that this guy has
been continually doing this.
But it seems like most are dismissing this
because, you know, he's a democrat.
That's how this tends to work. He was
kicked out of the army because he didn't
wanna take the COVID vaccine. I can kind
of understand that. But, dude, don't go around
spreading conspiracy theories because you have an axe
to grind. So now this guy is a
new face. Let's be clear. Obviously, that was
the right move no matter what. And even
he gives him that, which just clearly continues
to show you that that conversation was not
partisan.
Everybody seems to sense the problem, I guess,
except Donald Trump. Email. And Sean Ryan let
him on his show to talk about how
the Cybertruck bomber is actually still alive, and
he knows gravitic
propulsion systems are actually being used by China
in drones on the East Coast. This guy
is wackadoodle and Now to be clear, I
wouldn't dismiss them because we think that topic
is lunacy. Like, it's but what's incredible is
that you're taking such a strong leap without
proving any of it.
Like, the kind of technology they're talking about.
Like, we're we're it's like they're trying to
make this bombastic. But, nonetheless,
the reason to dismiss this is not it's
overall, it's because of the evidence.
He only adds a couple parts of that.
The rest of it, you can dismiss.
Sean Ryan, let him just talk. So regarding
Which is true. Sam Shumate, I basically have
a bunch of JSON data on the guy.
And I told him if he lied again,
what would happen? But I guess he chose
not to listen. So now we're gonna do
it the hard way, which is actually kind
of the way I prefer. So keep in
mind, when you listen to this guy, he
already has a history of just making up
emails out of thin air. He did it
with this story, which he posted on Instagram
last year. And Sean Ryan,
shame on you.
Shame on you for not vetting these sources.
Agreed. I agree with that. Right? Now there's
just obviously two points in there. One being
that I think what he's telling you is
interesting, especially since we now see this falling
apart. But also interesting it is that things
that might be important get dismissed because they're
flavored with partisanship, and that kills me. That's
what partisan stuff does.
Now Patrick says, and this is where the
shifts it's interesting. He goes, intel guy, Sam,
from Sean Ryan's podcast, Disinfo Debacle, is now
pushing out a new plot line on the
Vegas Tesla conspiracy. Now this is the 5th
January. This is today.
Eventually, they may get it right if they
keep adjusting the narrative. Even a broken clock
is right twice a day.
Clint Russell.
Major 180 from Sam Shumate who is on
with Sean Ryan just yesterday.
During the show, he believed Livelsberger was happy
and alive because some DNA claimed that nobody
was able to prove. Wild how anybody took
that at face value when all I did
was look into it and going, well, I
don't see any information. If it was a
DNA report, that would be coming from police
so it would be mainstream. But guess what?
That's the it's
I I just I so I guess almost
tired of trying to make fun of these
things. It's just so stupid.
I just I mean, I I of course,
when I couldn't find it, I didn't then
go as false. I just simply go to
okay. Well, I went, okay. Well, that doesn't
seem to line up with what I would
expect unless I can see something other than
this guy saying that. For me, it doesn't
exist yet. I'm not gonna dismiss it. I
keep it there. I I even have it
on a screen right now. I have, all
you guys know I've got, like, a 1000000
things open.
But see, how many people went along with
that? That became a running narrative all day.
Oh, he's really alive, and they put you
know why? Because it went with the narrative
they wanted from that.
Either it was a democrat thing or it
was a secret outside you know, the point
is it wasn't because he was just a
US military guy that went crazy.
Or and I don't even I still don't
even think that's probably the case. But either
way, now
he claims he was an anti he was
on antipsychotics,
and he's not alive.
I mean, come on, guys. Like, you don't
at this point, you go, well, that's a
completely new story. So either he's lying
or he's a grifter. I mean, you make
up your bottom line. We need to put
this down and stop acting like this is
relevant other than just because it's entertaining.
And the point is antipsychotics is a very
important conversation. But you just like usual, a
lot of these things get dismissed now because
they become buried in BS partisan narratives.
He says, is this just and this is
what frustrates me from Clint. Is this just
new info, or did he get pressure to
change his story?
Or how about you just go nonsense?
We should stop wondering. If he just twinges
okay. You can consider whether he just got
pressure to change his story, but how about
we recognize the first story has yet to
be confirmed?
So why would we care if he got
pressure to change it if we don't even
know which one's real? Maybe this one's real.
That's silly, guys. It's because it's more right
now, an honest investigator would have put I
wouldn't wouldn't even be talking about this until
you could verify it, but it's entertaining
and it's everywhere.
And I just simply said unreal.
Obvious from the start, from my perspective.
Now it just got cartoonish more so anyway.
So now look to who is still trying
to keep the narrative going.
And I just thought this was funny. Some
one of these memes going around. I'm not
sure who made this. Somebody just posted it
somewhere and it just shows a cyber truck
crashing into the twin towers and a passport
found on the other side. You know, it's
just
they really do think we're that stupid.
Now, here's Alex Jones saying, remember, so the
whole story started out where it was an
ISIS attack. Right? Until that very rapidly got
shown to at least be so inconsistent that
it I mean, anything's possible.
But even the conservative discussion is now kind
of on a different path. My point though
is that right away, he jumped on it.
Alex is saying, potential ICE's cell in Byron
College Station connected to the morning this morning's
attack.
Okay. How that end up? Well, we're we're
this is on the second. It's now 5th.
Did what happened, Jones? Or did we find
the cell? Were they investigated? Was it even
happening?
So if it wasn't the nicest thing or
it was only one individual, what are the
types of point? It's all about keeping the
narratives going. David Icke says, this is a
guy who once questioned the and investigated false
flag attacks. You may not believe that now,
but it's true.
And Derek just simply says and, again, this
is what he says
last night, yesterday.
Elon is getting more done in the fight
against the neo liberal globalist tyranny
than anyone except for Donald Trump in the
last 100 years.
Elon is the game changer. I am proud
to back 95% of Musk's agenda that I
know is dead on see, he does that
to give you with the caveat. I don't
support everything.
It's just so lazy.
Right? We're gonna investigate the algorithmic thing, but
then continue going
it's it's it's it's sad. It's sad.
And he says, if you still doubted that
Jones is a sellout and leading people back
into the false two party paradigm and technocracy,
here you go. Jones wants you to trust
the scientific and technological elite he warned about
2 decades ago in endgame.
Now here is it gets especially interesting.
Donald Trump speaks up on the second. Interesting
timing right as he was saying the same
thing on the second. He says, when the
Biden open border policy with that policy, I
said many times during rallies and elsewhere that,
guess what, guys?
Radical Islamic terrorism and other forms of violent
crime will become so bad in America that
it will become hard to even imagine. So
think about ignoring everything else we're seeing in
this country alone.
And now that you have a narrative that
clearly turns out to not be radical Islamic
terrorism, they just lurch at it. We knew
it. That's the thing, and it's everywhere. We're
all wait a minute. Where? What are we
talking about?
I I don't see all this of course,
911, but even then, we should all begin
to realize that's not what actually happened,
or that they're the ones funding those things,
and you can prove that.
And look. You wanna think Trump doesn't know,
fine. If that makes you understand it better,
maybe he doesn't know. I think it's obvious
they're all involved.
My point though is this is going as
by to Whitney's telling you, we're going right
back to square 1, guys. We're now back
to war on terror fighting radical Islamic terrorism.
Seriously?
This is so lazy.
That's not to say that there's not radical
elements, but, guys, you can prove this. They're
funding these groups. Or with Saudi Arabia and
Israel and everything else they're working on, they
are actively
or, guys, the group that's controlling Syria right
now. I'm gonna actually gonna end with that
to wrap up here pretty quick. The point
is he says, that time has come. Only
worse than I've ever imagined. Really?
Point to it.
You have this attack on Trump Tower?
What are what are we talking about? How
is that right there worse than anything you
ever imagined? Pretty sure I can imagine worse
than a couple of events that aren't even
what you're talking about. This is hype, and
it's lazy.
Joe Biden is the worst president in the
history of America. I'm good. I I agree
with that. I agree with all of them.
I think you're all ridiculous. It says a
complete and total disaster. He's and really, the
point is, it's all it's there it's the
people behind the power structure.
He says what he and his group of
electing election interfering thugs have done even though
they just won apparently and they're not
so anyway, it's whatever. It says have done
to our country and will not be soon
forgotten.
Oh, wait a second.
Oh, I'm sorry. I was that's the wrong
one. So hold on. I was thinking of
the CIA one. I thought this was the
one, but we're this so same thing on
this one. He's just hyping the I the
idea of radical Islam terrorism. David Icke says,
you are a front for the same network
that he is and you know it. It's
all theater and whoops. He's talking about,
Biden. So he's comparing Biden
saying, you may be savior for many, but
I see you with crystal clarity. Radical Islamic
terrorism in quotes appears just before you come
to office to give Israel everything at once.
Just a coincidence. Nothing to worry about.
And this is where I think this is
what I was saying a second ago. This
is what I think is wild.
So Donald Trump, after all of that, same
thing, January 2nd, comes out and says, our
country is a disaster, a laughing stock all
over the world. So it's kind of the
same starts the same way. This is what
happens when you have open borders
with with weak, ineffective, and virtually non existent
leadership.
The DOJ, FBI, and Democrat state, which I'm
not even sure, you know, say that they
just love to keep frame it like that.
But we're the uni party, but that's like
this separate entity.
And local prosecutors have not done their jobs.
They are incompetent and corrupt having spent all
of their waking hours unlawfully attacking their political
opponents. Me.
Can't can't not do that. Right? It's all
about me all the time. Rather than focusing
on protecting Americans from outside and inside
violent scum that has infiltrated all aspects of
our government. He'd be he'd be forgiven if
you thought he was pointing to Israel. He's
not. And our nation itself. Democrats should be
ashamed of themselves for allowing this to happen
to our country. Okay. So so far, probably
most people are gonna go, yeah. They've ruined
it because they don't they have. But it's
just my opinion, just the government. But nonetheless,
he's right about a lot of what's been
going on. Okay.
It's a shame what they have allowed to
happen to this country.
So the CIA must get involved, he says.
Okay. It's a shame what they've allowed to
happen. So please, Zionist technocrats in deep state,
take control to save us from Zionist technocrats
in deep state.
It's just silly.
Now as far as I can tell, this
one thing more than anything has shinked a
lot of people.
Most people that I've engaged with, they don't
even know how to respond to this. People
that would otherwise defend Trump to the hilt
have or, like, they they think it's fake.
The CIA must get involved? You mean the
same CIA well, I'll I'll ask you Whitney's
point. I'll let her say it. Now before
it is too late, he says. The USA
is breaking down. A violent erosion of safety,
national security, and democracy is taking place all
over our nation. Yeah. Clearly by design. They
are and this is being driven to reality.
Only strength and powerful leadership will stop it.
See you on January 20th. Everyone's doing that.
In fact, there's some really, really dumb people
out there going, once they get,
once they get inaugurated on January 6th, it'll
all change.
I think you mean the 20th, bud. You're
confusing your narratives. But the point
is that, clearly, they want you to think
it's all gonna change when he takes
the reality, if you think that calling in
the CIA
to save you from the I mean, how
do you even make sense of that? The
CIA, as Whitney says,
the CIA must get involved before it's too
late. A call to have the CIA involved
in domestic policing from the guy who was
supposedly being constantly targeted by the CIA, all
because of an alleged terror threat based on
groups created and arguably still managed by the
CIA and Israel, Al Qaeda and ISIS. Checks
out.
2025 is shaping up to be the year
of make Palantir a CIA front company
great again.
That's the point.
The CIA or rather the well, same point.
The Palantir that
is
embedded like a tick in his administration.
Israel and all the rest, guys. I mean,
this just can't become more obvious.
But don't worry,
Alpha Warrior is gonna make it all okay.
Okay? Something big is brewing, he says. Same
tweet, but on truth social. Same point. CIA
must get involved now, he says in truth
social. And then re puts it out on
Twitter as well.
He says this though. Trump's latest true social
post isn't just another rant. There's more to
it than meets the eye.
Here we get ready for your partisan assumption
that makes it all okay. A simple read
might miss the deeper signals. You mean your
assumptions based on what you want it to
read like? He says, but when you break
it down, in very qanon style,
the hints and warnings start to reveal a
potential game changing message. So literally, he means
read this and then you assume what you
think you can glean from the different words
and the way you think they make sense.
So basically, blindly assume.
He says January 20th,
CIA involvement,
violent erosion of democracy. This is basically q
n on stuff, guys.
What's what's really being said here? I don't
know, alpha warrior. Maybe literally what he wrote.
You know, it's certainly possible he's giving you
a cryptic a cryptic message.
But my point would be, even if it's
true, you still can't prove that and have
no idea
how to suss that out.
It's Trump signaling something coming sooner than we
expect.
I've done a full breakdown for my paid
subscribers. Oh, and there we go. And then
it's always us that get accused of the
grifting for money. But they're come behind here
like Matt Wallace. I'm breaking everything behind this
paywall. And then he just does the same
nonsense that doesn't show you anything more behind
a paywall. And trust me, you won't wanna
miss this one. Trust me.
Subscribe now to get the full analysis.
Or he's just working with the CIA and
Palantir, but that but don't trust me.
Whitney says, kind of telling that Israel
significantly ups its Hasbar budget for 2025,
usually focused on Americans and Europeans.
And now attacks from terror groups that never
attack Israel, by the way, despite being radical
Islamist, we're told, and have provable CIA Mossad
ties have unleashed a convenient wave of media
slop that echoes that which preceded the Iraq
war and which also, conveniently for Israel, conflates
Palestinians with ISIS
everywhere you look.
But don't worry.
Should I should have said, look over there.
Unusual. UFO crashed in Phoenix. UFO footage leaked.
Look at that.
Looks like a UFO to me. Oh my
god. Look at that. It's crazy. And then,
woo woo, fact check. At least from Twitter.
Maybe they're trying to hide it. This is
a video engineer
gen video generated through the use of artificial
intelligence.
My point is it just doesn't, you know
and I'll just use that to point out
that you should check out this part 1
from Matt Ehret. A century of UFO psyops
exposed part 1. From war on war of
the worlds to Lawrence's Rockefeller's disclosure project. Now
part 2 is already out. Part 3, probably
coming out tomorrow. I kept I've said that,
like, 3 times now. But tomorrow, I have
an article from Derek, and this one is
gonna be getting out tomorrow. Or the part
3, anyway.
It's important to see how this is working,
guys. It all comes together in a very
alarming agenda.
Same thing I was talking about earlier. So
while they're literally in the middle of a
psychological operation against you, this is what they
do to make you think, well, he can't
be a part of it because he just
pointed that out.
Rothmas says,
first of all, the meme says, do you
mean our government?
I mean, you mean our own government is
running psychological operations on us with a counterintelligence
program?
Funded by the money that they extort from
you every time you touch money.
And this this Rothma says, yes.
Elon says, real Donald Trump will put a
stop to this.
How embarrassing. You mean, despite how often they
are? I mean, literally involved with them now.
Entire 4 years full of them, but, you
know, never mind. But Andrea Lynn says, it's
hilarious yet sad how people actually believe 2
steep state multibillionaires,
captain Brainship and Jab Father will save them.
Cuckservative,
she says, and I don't think it's conduct
conduct conductive or I don't think it helps
to call them names, but I I get
why she's frustrated, are some of the worst,
most gullible people on the planet.
But point is the same. So he's gonna
save you from the things that we're totally
doing right now. It just it's a way
of trying to distance yourself from what you're
currently doing in my opinion. Now I'm gonna
go over this more in the next show.
But, first of all, just seem about this
in point. So here we are highlighting this
seems to be something other than this, but
this was posted on 3rd. It says Islamism.
So broad stroking, literally everybody in the in
the entire ideology of Islam. That's what it
it's all bad. It's like saying Christianity
ruined this.
It should be insulting because that's ridiculous.
Ruined Britain, he says. Despite how provable you
can show weaponized migration and who's involved, he
says, don't let it ruin America with a
picture of the cyber truck.
And he goes, the dam has broken, Alex
Jones says.
It's transparent, the agenda, guys.
And they,
Derek's article about the mass deportations. Okay? Now
I'm gonna go over this in the next
show.
I just wanna point out quickly.
Private prison firms contributed more than a $1,000,000
to Trump's reelection. Now they expect a business
boom.
Literally talking about the GEO Group. Okay?
Investors appear to have noticed the company's stock
price jumped 80% since the beginning of the
month. They're literally telling you $400,000,000
annual if they're allowed to house all the
people they claim they're gonna deport.
That's what they're telling you. This guy has
actually a a a a an, a video
of them talking about it. Literally saying, we're
built for this. This was our moment.
And Wall Street apes is going, see, this
proves he's actually gonna do it. Kind of
missing the point.
And that Derek says, this isn't a good
thing anymore.
And the point down here is that she's
simply telling you, look, this is ridiculous.
This This is a conflict of interest. These
people have they've donated Trump's administration, and now
he's using them to house legal immigrants, maybe
doing it for that point. I don't think
that. But, nonetheless, that may be one of
the reasons conflict of interest and ethics pledges
are being signed. I don't know. Either way,
that is a huge conflict of interest and
shows you an alarming problem.
The cheerleading for expanding private prisons and biometrics
among the so called dissident right on this
site is unnerving.
If you think this expansion of the police
state is just gonna be for illegal immigrants,
you've ignored the past 40 years of American
history. Well said, Whitney.
Now I'll play this to end,
and we will be going over a few
more things. Oh, you know, I do wanna
show you this real quick. More about Israel
and stuff. I just I unfortunately, I went
I'm already late. I don't wanna get into
it. I have stuff I have
to be getting to right now, frustratingly enough.
I thought I had at least 4 hours,
but, we're already at 3:30. The point is
Syrian girl played this today. The guy who
destroyed the statue of the virgin Mary in
a Trump video made viral by Trump is
now the defense minister of Syria.
Not a joke.
Here's Trump sharing this retweeting it. Here's the
Guardian literally talking about him doing that and
having the PM of his of of of
UK say
Theresa May saying it was wrong to tweet
that from that group,
and Trump doubling down on it.
Here's the actual tweet saying, don't focus on
me. Focus on the destructive radical Islamic terrorism.
It's a it's an agenda, guys.
And the point is that that guy just
became a minister of Syria. So explain for
me how they can be talking about radical
Islamic terrorism and using an example that Trump
made about who this guy is, and yet
somehow Trump and all the rest of them
currently support that guy in Syria.
What you're seeing right there is the game.
Maybe Trump being played. The point is they're
supporting the very thing they pretend they're fighting.
That's the moral of the story. And here's
another example.
This group, this is a fact check group
in regard to Syria information has now yet
again proven. This is another minister
who is on videos executing women around the
world.
This is Turkey continuing to bomb Syria despite
the fact that nobody's fighting back. That's still
happening.
And here are Israelis now calling Syria Northern
Israel.
It just never stops. And this was just
gonna be about some horrifying things they're continuing
to do to Palestinians, but we'll get into
it more tomorrow.
I'll end with this clip again just so
we remember where this all comes from, guys.
Right now, the fact that this can't there
there needs to be something this needs to
be more clear than anything we're talking about.
Because it shows you something that is interconnected
to every part of the story.
And honest people are beginning to call this
out. Now it doesn't have to be the
only thing happening.
But it is a central part. It's a
central cog in how this all works. And
the people are trying they're trying to deviate
you to the focal point of this cog
are the ones who know that it's involved.
Because they refuse to highlight the over connect
I mean, look, I I I shouldn't say
that's because.
I know they know it because I've seen
them point at it before. But, why why
they're not connecting the dot now is up
for you to decide.
That's what I think though.
So I'm gonna leave it there for today,
guys. Thank you for tuning in. It's important
that we continue to call this stuff out
because it is transparent right now. And what
I hope is that you can just reach
the people that are I mean, I mean,
there's a lot of things that's ever been
a moment where we've seen more, maybe say
for, like, the COVID 19 time frame,
more people kinda seeing it together.
And and across the partisan sphere, that is
where we can find real unity to actually
change
internally, our government, our circumstance, if that's even
possible right now. And not jumping into the
next partisan hype or the next scaremongering tactic
or the next that's what they want from
you. It's never it's impossible because there these
events are getting more and more alarming.
My point though is that we need to
give it our best shot because right now,
we have an opportunity like we keep seeing.
But either way, I know you guys care.
I know you're out there doing this because
you want the right thing. And I know
a lot of people that believe in some
of the partisan elements. I'm I'm of the
belief that most of you want right for
this country.
That's why I'm trying to help.
You know? And again, I could be wrong.
I'm open to hear your ideas, but I
think what is being shown right now needs
to be enough to at least kinda pump
the brakes
for us to recognize that maybe they don't
see it.
And you and again, if that makes you
feel better about it, as long as you're
recognizing it's happening and the problem is moving
forward, and maybe you're there isn't. Maybe it's
even China doing it. If that also makes
you feel better, all I want people to
recognize is I clearly see foreign elements
con I mean, you could say controlling. Influencing
an alarming degree the outcome of what this
country is doing, to a point to where
it is right now
turning this country inside out to achieve a
certain outcome.
That if you wanna talk about America first,
the first thing we should do is stop
that from happening.
Thank you for tuning in. Thank you for
at least asking these questions. That's all I
want from you, is to be able to
consider something outside what you're being shoved down
there that something that is being shoved down
your throat and everywhere you look right now.
That alone should be enough to call it
out, but just ask these questions. Consider
what they don't want you to think about.
Anyway, thank you all for being here and
your ongoing support. This platform wouldn't exist without
you. As I used to say a lot,
and I'll say more going forward if I
mean it. You are the last American vagabond.
This wouldn't exist without you. And they know
that. And that's why they're coming after all
of us. So
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Israeli embassy was unusual.
My very first day at the CIA, we
had a senior FBI agent come to talk
to the new higher class.
And one of the things that he said
has stuck in my mind
all of these 32 plus years.
We were talking about trying to spot spies
who were spying on us. Most embassies here
in Washington have what are called declared officers.
Those are foreign intelligence officers who are here,
formally known to the FBI and the CIA
as intelligence officers.
This FBI agent told us at the time
that the Israeli embassy
was unusual. The Israeli embassy had 2 declared
officers, 1 from Shin Bet and 1 from
Mossad.
And it had
187
undeclared officers
that the FBI had been able to identify
spread out all across America,
in academia,
in the defense contracting industry. What's the first
industrial revolution will lead to is a fusion
of our physical,
our digital,
and
our biological
identities.
The difference of this forced,
industrial revolution is it doesn't change what you
are doing. It changes you if you take
a genetic editing. Right. Just as an example.
It's you who are changed. Yeah. And, of
course, this has a big impact on your
identity.
It is important
to use the COVID 19 crisis
as a timely
opportunity.
So people assume,
we are just going back,
to the good old world which we had,
and everything will be normal again
in how we are used to normal in
the old fashion.
This is,
let's say, fiction.
It will not happen.
See
see,
cut, which we have now,
is much too strong,
in order not to leave traces.