Nobody will be safe
if not everybody is vaccinated.
Are you vaccinated, if I may ask? Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I'm very, like, pro
vaccination. Yeah. We've, the science is unequivocal. Can
you imagine, sir, that in 10 years when
we are sitting here, we have an implant
in our,
brains, and,
I can immediately feel because you all will
have implants. Just think of sensors
planted into our brains. Basically
implanted in your skull.
So
but it would be
flush with your skull. So you basically,
take out a chunk of skull, replace put
put the neurolink device in there.
You you put
the the electrode you insert the electrode threads
very carefully into the the brain. It doesn't
change what you are doing. It changes you
if you take a genetic editing. It's a
fusion of
the physical, the digital,
and the biological world.
That's
really
the essence of the 4th industrial revolution. A
merger with biological intelligence
and machine intelligence. An effort for man to
merge with machine in a healthy way. Yes.
To beat machines, you basically have to merge
with machines. Most likely. Yes. As work is
changing, is a universal basic income,
really a a a solution to the to
this problem? I I think, ultimately, we will
have to have some kind of universal basic
income, and I think some kind of a
universal basic basic income is gonna be necessary.
Decarbonization
of the economy. Where are they traveling? How
are they traveling? What are they eating?
What are they consuming on the platform?
So individual
carbon footprint tracker.
Stay tuned. We don't have it operational yet,
but this is something that we're working on.
I mean, my top recommendation, honestly, would be
just to have a carbon tax. Cisco release
it is
necessary.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Tuesday, December 24th, 2024.
Thank you for joining me on this holiday.
I guess not weekend, but holiday
what would you call it? Break from normal
time frames. Thank you for joining me on
December 24th as you're preparing for Christmas tomorrow,
enjoying your Christmas Eve with your family. And
I don't expect that we're gonna get the
usual engagement because I hope people are taking
a break from all of this. Now, unfortunately
well, I shouldn't say unfortunately, but just by
nature of what I do, it's very difficult
for me to to pull away from some
of this stuff. And yesterday,
basically, if you haven't watched yesterday's show, I
ended up taking longer, which shocker. I know.
I took longer than I expected and, ultimately,
had a whole part I wanted to cover
in foreign policy
that I knew that if I left aside
until after 25th, that I would ultimately lose
the I would be more focused on what's
going on in the moment, and I wanted
to cover some of this stuff. So, that's
the point of why I decided to do
a show today. And I'm gonna be spending
the rest of after the show, the rest
of the day with my family. I'm gonna
be taking tomorrow off and really just kind
of immersing myself in this time frame, which
I think we all should be doing. And
I'll I'll, I mean, in general, I'll start
with some of these things. I said a
lot of it this morning, and I wake
up, and I said some yesterday. So I
don't wanna be too repetitive about it, but
just and you guys have you guys have
to follow this platform. You know my opinions.
I say this every year and and what
I believe is important about this time. And,
obviously, we have much less of the kinda
weird political division aspects of, like, what songs
we're not supposed to listen to. Steve and
I were talking about this this morning, which
is interesting. It shows you, I think, that
there's just a choice of the focus of
the mainstream dynamic of both sides of it
on what we're supposed to be looking at
right now. And the the woke stuff is
kind of taken a back seat, which doesn't
those people all still exist. So it's interesting
that that stuff's not being focused on as
much. But the point being that usually you
get that idea, you know, don't say Merry
Christmas and all this stuff, which I just
think is ridiculous. Where whatever your religion is,
wherever you come from, somebody saying Merry Christmas
is not saying you're supposed to believe what
I believe. They're saying have a merry have
a a nice day. Have a merry holiday.
And if somebody wanted to say that around
some other religion, whatever the phrase would be,
I I think it's up to be taken
as a compliment. It's what it is. So
the point is being whatever you come from,
whatever your background,
I find this time frame to be a
time where we a lot of people, I
would like to believe from Jore, do their
best to be their best self, to be
the best version of who they want to
be or strive to be the person that
they believe they can be.
And it's what's it and this is just
at least what I what I believe. And
it's more it's the
materialistic
kind of present aspect of it, which is
enjoyable,
is not what it's about. And I think
we all could acknowledge that. It's about the
deeper meaning behind it all. Of course, from
my perspective as a Christian, the religious aspect
of it is a very, very important part
of it for me. But just, again, outside
of that, for the world today, I do
believe that it is a it's a nice
time where people try to strive to be
better.
And the point I'll leave it with to
start is just that I feel like we
need to reflect on that and ask ourselves,
why can't we just do that every day?
As I talk about a lot on this
show, just to every day is just about
being a little bit better than yesterday, Just
striving to better yourself. And if every day
you have the finding that rationale, the reason,
whether it is because it's Christmas or whatever
the reasoning is to just decide to be
the best self that you the bed the
best version of who you want to be.
And interestingly enough, that doesn't even have to
mean that you are that person yet. Something
that I've said before recently, and and I've
I can't remember what I saw this on,
but it really did resonate with me. This
simple idea that I felt was simple but
very profound is that I don't think people
are necessarily
ever one thing or you know, it's not
all one thing or another.
We all struggle with choices in our lives.
We all grow and learn and become something
different as we, you know, and evolve.
And incremental choices
become who you are.
And every one of those make a difference
no matter how small. And the point is
asking in the in the context of what
I'm what I remember watching is somebody saying,
you know, how do you be a better
person or how do you be that? How
do I become like that? And the point
is it's just a choice.
You just make a choice to be a
better person, to be good, to open this,
or be there for this person, or to,
you know, to take the action you argue
as being a better person. And the person
asks, well, what about tomorrow? And he goes,
you have to wake up tomorrow and make
the same decision again. Right? You have to
wake up every day and decide to be
what you want to be. It's as it's
simple as that, but it's also in a
way as complicated as that. It's not just
the inherent concept. It's that you have to
make a choice to be that person, and
the point then becomes that whether or not
you are that person, you can still act
outwardly as a good person. And the point
then becomes that
eventually, without noticing it, it just becomes a
part of your nature.
It becomes you. And I think that's what
we are as human beings. It's just about
these choices. The striving to be better becomes
better. You are better now because you then
embody those things that maybe at first, you
were kinda faking it to make it, which
kind of is the reality of how the
way the world works. I've gone through so
many things in my past where whether careers
growing up or or jobs I've had where,
you know, I I really didn't know as
much as I maybe projected that I did
in the context of, like, when I first
got a job in the restaurant or so
on. And then, you know, but you you
like, I had a chef that told me
that. Funny story on a quick side note
is where this is one of my favorite
chefs going through culinary school with the Culinary
Institute of America in Napa Valley. He said,
basically, he'd walk around and ask, and be
like, do you know what you're doing, chef?
And most people were young and we're new,
and we're not, you know, we're trying to
learn, and we would go, I'm not sure.
What? Am I doing something wrong? And he
would be like, wrong answer. The right answer
is yes. Always yes. Like, the point is
you're projecting that kind of, you know,
control as a as a leader of a
kitchen was what he was trying to instill.
And the point was the answer is always
yes. Do you know what you're doing? Yes.
I do. You know? And it's not necessarily
that you go forward not knowing what you're
doing and you hide that, but it's about
project he it's about a moment in trying
to teach something and trying to project that.
And that's the idea that we're talking about
is just choose to be that.
Choose to be that person, aim for that.
And if you fall short, that's okay. Wake
up tomorrow, make the same choice again. And
I think that doesn't have to only happen
on Christmas. So I thought that was something
nice that I think I it's something I'm
always bringing up in this time frame, but
I thought I'd reshare that with you today.
Now I wanted to start with so today,
in general, what we're gonna do is follow-up
on something I think is very important. And
this has to do with the thing we
discussed yesterday, which is basic DARPA's x AI
program. And now interestingly timing, interest timing
interesting timing.
Today, there's a new report about another, I
think, series c or one of the one
of them not the original, but one of
the secondary series of fundings
for XAI,
the lowercase xai, totally not the same as
XAI from DARPA, we're told, even though there's
about a month or a month and a
half or a couple months difference between the
ending of 1 and the starting and the
other. And now we just got more, I
think, $6,000,000,000
of more funding for this program, which weirdly
seems to have the same exact direction.
So we're gonna go over the, I think,
the obvious transition between one to the other
just like pretty much every other program that
gets presented by some kind of technocrat, some
kind of totally not government connected entity in
the Silicon Valley field
and then you take a step back and
go weird that DARPA was working on basically
the exact program with a totally different name,
and then they stop that and this starts
over here. How many times do we need
to see that happen before we realize how
this works? I think that's important. Now we're
also gonna talk about some other interesting points
within that that follow-up from shows the stuff
we pretty much talked over the last couple
of days, point about censorship, and then the
large point today in general is about the
the as I think I I titled it,
her rats expose a sadistic nature of the
IDF, which at this point, I'd imagine most
of you have seen some of these articles,
but I'm hoping because it's been out for
a few days, and I've kind of had
it on the side, and it's really important
to see. And I briefly pointed it yesterday.
We're at a point now where this is
not about debating who's right or wrong. These
are IDF members that are on the record,
and some of them before October 7th,
just, I mean, outlining how they sadistically broke
the arm of a child because they just
thought they said Palestinian children shouldn't be alive.
Like, these are quotes from IDF leadership,
and we're still acting like we're debating whether
this is happening. I mean, it needs to
not just reflect on the people that we're
pointing to, but the power structures knowing that's
happening and going out of their way to
gaslight you into thinking it's not. Or even
worse, to thinking that it's the right thing
if they do it. It's pretty horrifying.
Now, of course, obviously,
a day like today makes it I guess,
you know, you feel like it's the wrong
day to talk about some of these things.
And if that's the case, then I I
get it. Come back to it after the
after Christmas holiday. But I do think these
things what one point we'll get into is
about what Netanyahu is, like, every single year
doing in Syria,
Attacking Christian locations and bombing and burning down
Christmas trees. Taking action that is directly meant
to hurt Christian populations while then projecting to
the world that he stands with Christians. Happens
every single year, and it makes me sad.
So let's get started with
a couple points about censorship that just stood
out to me that I thought were interesting.
And this is,
something that I saw on YouTube, which I'm
I rarely care that much these days about
YouTube at all because of how blatantly we
know they censor. But the well, this is
the,
TLAB pirate account we're using right now. For
those briefly who don't know, we still we
still to this day, as you can see,
TLAB pirate streams use pirate accounts. After they
deleted our main account with over a 100000
followers and then the secondary account with over
50,000 followers, I'm just like, I'm done playing
this game like I am with all of
them for that matter. If Twitter had never
let us back on, I'd still be using
pirate accounts on Twitter, which we were. The
point is that people give me access to
their login, which used to be pretty taboo
and still is because obviously, I if I'm
dishonest with it, I could use this, you
know the point is there's people out there
that ultimately
have, like, a a random account they never
use. It's not like they have some big
business that I could hurt. And I ultimately
tell them you could lose everything. You could
be censored. They could block you off Google
products like myself,
but they wanna support us in getting the
message out. So this is just one of
those many. What's funny about it is this
idea
is really interesting. And even James Corbett leaned
into it. I know that,
Richard Grove started doing it. My this is
something that I created.
And if this was something that was allowed
to be viral this is a viral concept
in my opinion. The idea of circumventing the
the censorship structure in a way that is
like a community led, like, organic rise up.
Like, it's it's interesting. But because it's TLav,
it's me. Ryan Christian is not allowed to
have that kind of reach. That's that's what
I think anyway. I mean, I it's happening
all over the place, I think, where we
get amazing content out, or we write articles
that go out through TLav, and then it
gets posted on other great websites, by the
way. But then everyone decides to focus on
those websites, which okay. You know? Maybe it's
me. Maybe I'm the reason people don't wanna
look at it. I don't know. For me,
it's all about the information. Right? If if
it has to be that I have to
pull myself away from it to get the
information out there, then maybe that's the case,
which not saying I'm gonna do that. But
the point is this will never go away.
The problem is I just don't know why
that's kinda the case. But, anyway, on this
point being, they're censoring us on this platform.
And the last show we just did, Trump
to squeeze aid going into Gaza, which I'll
point out a second again. And look what
it says. The following content may contain graphic
or violent imagery, which I don't even remember
if we shared something that would be arguably
violent or graphic from, like, the Israel conversation
of certainly possible.
But my point is that, you know who
else shares this stuff on a regular basis?
Lots of late major partisan accounts or corporate
media accounts. I'm not sharing anything that I'm
not pulling off some kind of
the point is stuff that are pretty commonly
shown on these platforms, and yet I get
censored for it. But I wanna well, not
it wasn't bad. It was more so the
interesting timing of that same label, which gets
applied to things I post on Twitter, even
though not to everybody else. Selective. And I'm
not saying it's me and personal. I'm saying
it's about the idea of peep certain categories
of grouping, I would argue, objective nonpartisan information.
But on the reason I even showed you
that, because usually I don't even mention the
YouTube nonsense, is because I wanted to reiterate
the fact that Bitshoot is one that's not
doing that. And I had a really interesting
interview, a discussion on
where's the date on here? About 6 days
ago with, Jeffrey, who is somebody now working
to basically,
hopefully, bring Bitshoot into the the level that
it deserves to be at. Same exactly the
same point, by the way. I BitShoot is
a group that has been, as to its
detriment, fighting to protect free speech, even the
most disgusting comments you could imagine on their
platform because that's what free speech looks like.
And I also argue, and I think we
can prove, that it's being deliberately flooded with
that in order to
bury the site that does allow free speech.
My point, though, is that we had a
great discussion. Oh, and the what the Jeffrey,
who I'm talking to here, is somebody who
had been brought on to essentially try to
bring this site the site into what it
should be. And they reached out to me,
both the CEO and him, to try to
work with me in order to help BitChute
get it the attention that it deserves and
are willing to support TLab, and I brought
this up a while ago. And so I'm
I'm happy to lean into a platform that
I believe in that is also gonna help
support TLab, so I recommend you guys do
the same. You know? And now I this
is the main viewer that I put on
our website page. We can just look. Hopefully,
you're watching through this platform and using our
the pay shoot and the engagement on the
platform. But watch the interview because I really
did enjoy the interview, and we get into
a lot of different conversations or a lot
of, topics in conversation about many different things.
Now, we talked about this yesterday.
The main part being DARPA's XAI program. Now,
I simply went over this in a pretty
broad way, pointing out what it was and
showing the interesting timing of when it stopped
and when Twitter named x started. I didn't
even really get into the bill the kind
of building of what Elon is calling x
AI. So this is what I wanna talk
about today. The very alarming overlap to these
two things.
So in this show, we go over some
of this you can watch. So I'm gonna
briefly point to the things that we go
in more in-depth in the show I was
just pointing to.
This is entitled DARPA's explainable AI or just
x
AI program.
Quickly to sum this up, the bottom line
is they are trying the the at least
as it's being presented,
they're using
media engagement,
individuals who are engaging with these programs, artificial
intelligence and otherwise, to train it to essentially
be able to explain
the conclusions that it reaches. Now that's a
simple there's a lot more to it, but
that's what at least is being presented as
the focal point. And but my point is
how they're reaching that, if that's even what
they're trying to achieve, which is through engagement
with people like you.
And so what they're doing is they're con
they're cut this this exercise that went on
for years, like, 2017
all the way till the end of 2021.
I believe it was December 2021 when this
came to an end. My point is xAI
is the program came to an end in
2021,
and then
very short period of time later in 2020
early 2022, Elon Musk began to buy Twitter
and turned it into x.
And now he's working on a company called
XAI,
and we're supposed to be believe that they're
not even remotely connected. Despite XAI that Elon's
working on is currently doing exactly what this
program was.
It's not not making this up. It's easy
to see.
Here's how it evolved. This goes to June
of this year.
Explainable AI. So remember, at this point, we're
we're to believe that the DARPA version of
this has ended.
This is somebody else working on this explainable
AI for mental disorder detection
via social media. And what it's talking about
in here is exactly what that discussion was
from DARPA, but now
extending it out to not just individuals engaging,
but using social media to do so. And
using that social media to not only reach
explainable
information or, you know, why they came to
the conclusion they did, but in in so
in so far or in the in the
pursuit of
diagnosing you for potential mental illness,
which seems like a lot of interesting and
alarming intertwined
agendas right there.
Now this one is an ongoing one, deadline
being March 2025,
and this gets into all of the same
things we just talked about, including social media,
including x AI, explainable
artificial intelligence,
and even goes a step further and does
it with digital twins,
which is like the metaverse. Like, having a
and I went I'm not gonna go into
it again because it's a complex the point
being that in today's world, I'm of the
mind that I think it's easily proven or
shown to be, like, a scientific study more
than 1
or more so I mean, I think there
are studies about it, but more so like
a an outline of the direction. Like, basically,
the point is, technologically speaking, you have digital
twins of every like, a model. You could
take a small town. You could take the
entire world or take our country, where you
have digital examples that represent every person in
the model. And then
they continue to accumulate data about that person,
the twin of you. So there would be
a digital twin avatar of Ryan living out
its life based on the model they've given
it,
based on the algorithmic directions it's given. And
they enter in more information the more they
scoop for me. And the more they scoop
for me, the more that little twin becomes
basically identical to what I am and what
I do. Now, obviously, there's gonna be deviations,
but the point is, through that, you can
effectively predict
using machine learning algorithmic models what I will
do next Tuesday at 3 PM
based on at least how much they know
about me. So if I'm one of the
people that are constantly engaging on social media,
checking in everywhere, or they can at least
just track where I am and what I'm
doing based on my phone and what I'm
engaged with and the fact that I'm not
protecting my data, not using VPNs or whatever
else. Well, they scoop up literally everything I'm
doing and they can then track where I
am at what time every day over the
process of 10 years if they wanted to
and then use that to mathematically deduce where
I might be next week.
Now that's just one application of this stuff.
Now that's not even what they're getting into
here.
They're just simply saying using some model of
like that, digital twins, in order to basically
find optimizing health outcomes through explainable AI. So,
I mean, guys, if you can't see how
alarmingly this merges with the great reset, the
metaverse, all these different things that we were
super attuned to during COVID 19 and is
now being spearheaded by the current administration,
I don't think you want to. And I
I understand why you wouldn't want to. And
now this is where it gets even more
alarming.
So this is December 24, 2024,
today.
Elon Musk's a x a I with a
lowercase
x.
Right? So x a I with a capital
x is DARPA, and that's no longer here.
We're told that doesn't exist anymore, at least
not in the the study that connects to
DARPA, but the research that it produced is
still just out there for people to continue
to work on. So he starts x a
I with lowercase x.
After, by the way, starting x, which or
rather turning Twitter into x, which also connects
back to his x corp, which connects to
the other you know, it's like these things
all trail back together to the whole technocratic
direction and the PayPal mafia and Peter Thiel
and all the rest of the stuff we've
talked about. So Elon Musk x AI raises
$6,000,000,000
in fresh funding.
Says we are gonna need a bigger compute.
Oh, yeah. This is right here.
So it says Elon Musk AI has completed
its series c
funding
round, raising a total of $6,000,000,000.
Now that's on top of, like, 50,000,000,000 from
the first two.
It revealed in a Monday blog post. Now
it says, Musk's artificial intelligence
company
again, so realize we're talking about an artificial
intelligence company,
and DARPA was building an explainable artificial intelligence.
He said his artificial intelligence company
said the participants included
a 16 z, Sequoia Capital, of course, Morgan
Stanley, of course, BlackRock, of course.
So think about this, guys. The this is
what Elon Musk is working on
toward a direction of something that is
everything we're all worried about. And we're being
told, don't worry though because Elon's on the
right side. Except here he is working with
BlackRock to produce it. But I thought that
was a whole big problem for people on
the right, and it should be for everybody,
by the way.
But I guess it doesn't matter when you
find that connection to Rumble or or Elon
Musk. We just omit that, which shows you
the hypocrisy of it all.
Or Saudi Arabia. Does that make sense? Freedom,
democracy, free speech. Right? Oman and Qatar and
their sovereign wealth funds. California based Lightspeed Venture
Partners.
Are Democrats all bad except when we work
with them? Chicago based Valor Equity Partners, Dubai
based, v Vy Capital, and UAE based tech
investor, MGX.
Right. Just the epitome of free speech loving
democracies. Right? This is the opposite of what
we love to pretend this is, or they
do anyway. XAI added the chip makers, Nvidia
and AMD, took part as strategic investors and,
quote, continue to support XAI in rapidly scaling
our infrastructure.
Interestingly, overlap with the conversation about chips and
the chip acts and all all the different
things we've talked about.
I'll point
to David Icke's,
meme he put out about this, or rather
that he quoted from somebody else, or he
just says an encapsulation of a psyop. And,
of course, we remember what was going on.
That's why I started with that clip today.
Klaus Schwab, I'll put microchips in your brain.
Even said, within the next couple of years,
you will have microchips in your brain. And
we were like, no way,
which we should be freaking out about. Elon
comes on the field and says, I'll put
microchips in your brain. They're going, yay. Which
is kinda it's a I mean, it's simplified,
but we all see that happening.
Because
we don't want microchips in our brain, and
we just want Elon to be the one
saying he's gonna do it.
Pretty sad to see how simple this is.
And it wasn't like they were screeching and
going, we don't want your version of microchips.
People were during this conversation with Klaus Schwab,
predominantly the right was saying there's no effing
way. We see the agenda. We see where
this is going. We see the great reset.
And just because Elon steps in,
that just disappears?
Now, I don't believe that with most conservatives,
but I wonder why they're not standing up
and pushing back against the team sport politics
right of it all who pretend that there's
no problem here.
Now, look, and I can admit the possibility
that Elon is the good guy version of
this and what he's doing is gonna save
us from it.
But shouldn't we be standing back and going
to even want this at all? Why should
we be forced into this false dichotomy of
choosing between good versus bad, lesser of evils
of a problem that we don't want at
all?
Right? Like everything else. Maybe we don't want
chips in our brain. Maybe we don't need
to decide which AI we want. How about
we just pump the brakes a bit? But,
nope, they wanna rush you into a choice
because if we don't, the democrats are gonna
do it first. If we don't, China's gonna
do it first, which there's some level of
truth to the foreign policy point.
But I still argue that we should not
allow technocrats and obvious deceivers to force us
into aligning ourselves with what we kind of
already know we don't want, at least not
in the way they're rolling it out.
But if you get pushed into the lesser
of evils of anything right now, it seems
the partisan field will fall for that. You
don't think they know that?
Now it says, the vast amount of processing
power needed to train and run AI models.
He's basically underscoring the vast amount of processing
power needed to train these models, which has
fueled enormous demand for microchips. The same point
from the larger conversation
about where like, when you know, it's the
same thing when you look at these with
these kind of things framed from the partisan
field on one side, it becomes the biggest
problem in the world, but if there's it's
the you get it. The same point every
time. I mean, in the one I'm making
right now. It's bad when they do it.
It's good when we do it.
It's launch of Colossus, the world's largest AI
supercomputer,
powered by 10,000
vidahopper
GPUs,
which XAI plans to double in size to
20,000 chips soon. Now on a quick side
point, remember that my concern about the issue
with the with basically blockchain technology, but specifically
Bitcoin and the the strategic reserve, which we're
gonna be talking more about.
So when they're rapidly rolling this out, how
long if not already, by the way? And
so they're able to accumulate 51% of the
CPU power around this market, which then gives
them the ability to literally lie to us
and what's going on. They can create side
chains, which then become the reality that we
will never know was different from what was
actually happening. So that then becomes the illusion
of transparency using blockchain, which they've figured out
a way to circumvent. Now, it's not all
cryptocurrency are all blockchain, but it's specifically
bitcoin in this conversation.
There's different aspects of the same problem for
different things, but specifically in bitcoin, which they're
using, and I think that's by design. On
a, you know, quick point for those that
understand the conversation more, I am very much
of the mind that this has been broken
specifically
to bring it to this place.
Selectively held back.
Only allowing 1 megabyte of information. I wrote
about this a long time ago.
In every block which slowed it down, which
allowed it to never be able to rival
things like Visa,
and that's why it became
what they wanna make you think is just,
you know,
digital gold.
The exact opposite of how it was designed
to be. It was designed to be a
peer to peer financial transactional
process, meaning you don't need a middleman. You
don't need a bank. You don't need a
government. All you need is their cryptographic address.
That's it. And the real the reality of
it, you don't even need a a,
exchange, quite frankly. All you will and and
there's there's deeper points to get into how
that can work, but the reality is they're
trying to more centralize something that was supposed
to be the opposite. And so when you're
looking at this, where they're with Musk and
Trump's administration building out and literally telling you
they're going to lead that market and mine
Bitcoin,
I argue it's already happening. If you understand
right now that 5th more than 51% of
the market right now of that CPU power
is controlled by only 2 entities, I mean,
how do we know they haven't already worked
together? I mean, and not it's not just
about double spending, which would mean they're able
to spend bitcoin twice and hide that on
the blockchain, but, ultimately, that I think it's
about hiding what they're actually doing while presenting
the illusion that they're showing us everything while
presenting a false picture. And a hell of
a lot more that I'm not even gonna
get into around the what Bitcoin itself and
what they're developing be becoming sort of an
artificial intelligence concept and the idea of tracking
and surveillance and carbon markets, which is exactly
what I think is gonna roll up under
Trump using this stuff but with a different
narrative.
But it says XAI also released version 2
of Grok. So that's where you get into
the social media overlap. So, right, they're talking
about using these things to train these models.
And now, he's using Grok to using your
engagement with it to train these models. I
mean, guys, this is the same program.
This has an application programming interface and API
for developers to build on its platform. It's
Aurora image generator model for Grok and grokonx.
Now it says the company said it's training
Grok 3 and focusing on launching innovative new
consumer and enterprise products that will leverage the
power of Grok, Colossus, and Twitter to transform
the way we live, work, and play.
Pretty much sounds like the great reset and
everything else they're talking about.
All the the DARPA program, all this stuff
coming together. Now they're working out. GROC 3
is the in the newer iteration of this.
It's everything they told you this was. Now
it says its mission is to understand the
true nature of the universe.
Let me make sure that was the end
of it. Yeah.
To me, I mean,
isn't it the same point? Like, you can
make it broad like that and say it's
about understanding what but when you go specific
about it and look at what DARPA was
saying in these programs before Twitter became a
thing or x,
Ultimately, with the same with a finer point,
the same objective.
That worries me. And I think it should
worry all of us. Now here's another one
from further back. July 14, 2023.
Elon Musk says XAI so realizing again that
this has been the timing of this is
very important. We'll examine universe. Work with Twitter
and Tesla.
It says Elon Musk on Friday said the
purpose of his new artificial intelligence company, XAI,
will be to understand the universe. It says
Musk announced the formation of XAI on Wednesday
after accusing companies like OpenAI,
remember that,
and Google of developing the technology without considering
risks to humans.
I'm gonna show you in a moment how
right now Elon is working with OpenAI to
do what they're doing coming next.
So was it all just a bunch of
hype pretending that they were building the wrong
version so you could frame yourself as building
the right version so for them to simply
merge?
Good question. Hoping honest people can ask honest
questions. And it says, he said x AI
would seek to build a good
AGI.
Is that not literally my joking narrative right
there on paper?
No. No. Don't worry. We're not we're and
what what is it? It's,
I I swear it's it's funny that we
use an acronym.
I it's we're talking about an AI program,
but I was trying to find the exact
specific meaning for AGI.
Let's see.
See what it says. Oh, yeah. That's what
I thought. So it's just general intelligence. So
I think the point when they say AGI
is meant to sort of mean, like, a
sentient
or maybe still you tell me in the
chat what you think. When you're talking about
artificial general intelligence, does that imply that it's
more a sentient being or does that imply
that it's the other direction? I was in
the impression that you're talking about when they're
seeking an AGI, I think that's them trying
to seek, like, the legitimate artificial intelligence. Give
me your thoughts in the chat. Either way,
the same point applies to this conversation. He
said XAI would seek to build the good
artificial intelligence
as an alternative to Microsoft, Google, and OpenAI.
Okay.
Make sure you mishear that again. That we're
building the good version to balance to to
fight the bad guy version, which is OpenAI
and Google.
And he says AGI stands oh, I'm so
stupid. It's the second sentence right there. I
just wasn't capitalized. AGI stands for artificial general
intelligence and refers to AI that can solve
problems like human. Okay. So I I still
same question though. What do you guys think?
Because just because it can solve a problem
like a human does not mean that it's
sentient. Right? You tell me what you think.
But it goes on to say, the company
will use public tweets
to train its AI models and also may
work with Tesla on AI software. So, tell
me how that's any different than what we
just talked about. If they're using your public
information via the social media platform to train
these models in order to be able to
work to explain itself, like, the explainable AI
model was about trying to figure be have
a model that could then explain to you
why it made the decision that it did.
Now why that's important actually is because if
it actually is,
remember, we're all worried about somebody pretending this
is something in order and then just simply
pumping through its decisions and acting like AI
is deciding for us when it's really just
another powerful entity.
But then it says now, I mean, again,
don't the fact that they're using your tweets
to train this thing is the one of
the larger points. And it says such a
relationship would have meant mutual
benefit and could accelerate Tesla's work and self
driving capabilities.
Yep. Another angle of the great reset that
we're all up in arms about until Elon
rolls out his version of it. He also
accused all AI companies of training their models
using Twitter data and what he characterized as
an illegal manner. So you see, it's not
he's not upset that they're doing it. He's
upset that they're doing it, and it's my
data. You can't use my that's my company.
So you're using Twitter to train your models
in a negative way. That's what he's telling
you. The AI OpenAI, Google, that's the bad
guy stuff. So I'm building the good AGI.
But explain for me how it's any I
mean, obviously, it is different because if you
wanna intent would change it, but it's interesting
that they're both using your Twitter data to
find that outcome.
The only difference is narrative right now.
Think about that. And it says Musk who
has advocated for regulations in AI,
said he has pushed for meetings with White
House officials and has emphasized the importance of
regulating AI in his recent meetings with top
government officials in China. So that's my fine
the point I was saying before.
Why as always, we're forced into the false
binary of thinking, well, which we need to
have the regulated version versus the the other
version. How about we start asking whether we
should even be taking these steps right now?
Whether or not other governments are doing the
same thing. Now trust me. I get the
implications there. All I'm saying is maybe we
should be asking that question as opposed to
framing it as a foregone conclusion
that's not our choice because that's what that
really shows you. They they tell you this
is gonna happen no matter what, but then
pretend to engage with what you want. If
we all stood up today and said none
of us want any of this, they wouldn't
care. They would simply create some psychological presentation
of what we think. Like, here's, you know,
a small group that presents as the world
and the rest of you are
what's the word I'm looking for? Like with
COVID 19. Making you feel like you were
isolated and alone and nobody thought like you.
Turns out most people did. I think that's
super important.
So when we're talking about this overall,
we know we can see
the concerns about how they're literally using this
to train
their models.
They're using your open tweets to do so.
We have the very clear transition from DARPA
xAI to x to xAI, Elon version, and
it's doing the exact same thing
so far. Hopefully, you're following along. I think
it's pretty easy to see.
So now we enter this time frame where
we have things like this where Elon Musk,
also working on this the XAI dynamic, is
where is working with the National Reconnaissance Office
to build
a an all encompassing network of spy satellites,
which the NRO office, in a recent interview,
literally said, quote, you can't hide. And the
continuation of that
was he says, now you can't hide because
you're constantly being looked at.
Now are we are we of the mind
that the NRO and the NSA and the
and the government intelligence apparatus is not the
deep state? Or how we frame this? That
Elon's working with the NRO to build satellite
networks that the government's gonna use to and
telling you you can't hide anymore. And that's
not supposed to be a problem because Elon's
passively involved with it?
I mean, I I only say that because
he's not the one building well, I mean,
who knows? Maybe let's even say he's completely
involved.
How does that change the problem this obviously
is? And where where's this foggy line of
the deep state when we're literally talking about
the intelligence apparatus of this government
or whatever you wanna call it these these
independent governments of their own, it seems.
The point though is that he literally said,
on top of building this, Elon Musk is
gonna work with us to build out AI
to manage all of this.
So if you're not beginning to see the
problems of how over the far reaching interconnected
problem this becomes,
That they're building out something that is artificial
intelligence that's currently
learning from you and mapping out everything, I
would argue, that's now gonna be overlapped with
some kind of potential defense system that wraps
around our planet that can see you no
matter where you go.
Now ask yourself how that's even okay with
the rest of the world. Think about that.
Now, Dave David Eich, by the way, was
recently discussing Derek's amazing article right here on
his on his show. Derek just showed pointed
this out. Simply saying, why are so many
freedom loving people falling for technocratic military intelligence
contractors? Good question.
But here's an important development in all this.
This is from yesterday.
Teachers for Choice shared this with me, tagged
me in it. Palantir, Anduril, and talks with
OpenAI.
Elon Musk, SpaceX to take on defense giants.
Now, we've already actually talked about this.
I think even in the last show or
the long before. But the point that stood
out to me this time,
talks with OpenAI?
Well, hold on. Weren't you just telling us
they were the bad they they were the
bad version? They were the ones not regulating.
There was So he's building the good AGI,
which by the way, you know, again, the
way language works implies they're the bad AGI.
Here's what the article says.
This is from yesterday.
Palantir Technologies and startup, Andruil Industries, are are
talking with many other tech companies including OpenAI
and Elon Musk SpaceX to form a consortium
to jointly bid on US government contracts.
It's the aim is to take on traditional
defense giants,
like Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, RTX,
most likely with artificial intelligence enabled autonomous technology.
Great. So let's streamline the merchants of death
and their ability to maximize and how many
things they can accomplish and how much weapons
they can sell. That sound I mean, how
is that not
is that fighting the is that an outsider
fighting the deep state? Or is that a
guy immersing himself with what exactly we see
as the problem?
Meanwhile, Trump on Sunday named Scale AI's managing
director,
Michael
Krasios,
as the director of the White House Office
of Science Technology Policy.
He will advise artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency
czar, David Sachs.
Great. So you got David Sachs involved with
in artificial intelligence cryptocurrency, and then you've got
a guy literally working with scale artificial intelligence
managing the White House of Science and Technology
Policy. So these guys who are also, by
the way, while they're mentioning them, immersed with
what Palantir and Musk and OpenAI are working.
This is our government right now.
This is technocracy.
It's right in front of you.
And it says, Anduril has been developing
pilotless fighter jets and other autonomous systems. It
was founded by former
Facebook executive, Palmer Luckey, and 3 Palantir executives.
The incestuous relationship around all this is wild
to me, and not in a literal sense,
but just in the true meaning of the
word. Like, this is wild to me. And
what we're see and don't forget, Paul Palmer
Luckey is somebody that Whitney Webb has broken
down in a lot of different ways that
is interconnected, and it goes back a long
way to the mafioso nature of this government.
But currently, in regard to what I mean,
look at what look at how crazy that
is. You've got Onderil, which is one of
the AI companies that is aligned with, you
know,
also named after, like, a Lord of the
Rings reference, developing
pilotless fighter jets, which is, you know, what
another one of these aspects of the great
reset.
And this was founded by a former Facebook
executive,
Palmer Luckey, and 3 Palantir executives who are
currently
like a tick embedded in the current administration.
It's wild.
Now Bill Ackman
just tweeted this out. This is where we
this is what we referenced before.
Same article from Financial Times, Palantir on the
road. 2 of the largest US defense technology
companies are in talks with a dozen competitors
like SpaceX, OpenAI.
He says,
this would be the dream team, and no
enemies can compete.
I just read and I just read an
advanced copy
of the book is called The Technological
Republic.
Technocracy. It's what that what he talked about.
It's called the technological republic.
Hard power, soft power, and the future of
the west
by Alex Karp.
Alex Karp being this guy right here to
the left of the guy in the blue
shirt. Both Alex Karp and Peter Thiel through
their company Palantir are openly supporting the genocide
in Israel using their artificial intelligence to murder
people. It's not a joke. It's not even
hyperbolic. It's literally what's happening. And if you
need more information on that, you can look
up both of them really.
But Lavender being the more specific towards people,
972 magazine, the AI machine
directing Israel's bombing spree in Gaza.
This is what they're working on. So that
should worry you when you're watching them build
out something like this around the world with
these groups involved, with Israel playing an outsized
role in the direction of how this goes.
So here he is pointing back to Alice
Karp, who, by the way, just in an
interview, a very weird,
uncomfortable
interview that I think it was an arbitron
pointed out as imperial hubris, where Alice Karp
is literally saying the only way we can
be peaceful and happy is if everybody else
is scared. And then goes on to argue
that if you do something bad to us,
whatever that means right now, remember he just
said he dreamed about drone bombing people protesting
Israel.
So people doing bad things to the US,
whatever that means,
that we should hurt them and their mistress
and their family and their neighbor. Like, unreal.
These aren't terrorists, guys. These are the people
that are pretending we're fighting bad guys. Well,
what they're exuding what they're showing you is
the kind of mindset we should all be
fighting.
And he write he puts out a book
called the technological
republic and the future of the west as
they are embedded in Trump's administration.
And it says they make the case for
big tech working with the government on big
tech problems.
Right? Like, defense.
Is is the defense is that is that
a tech problem? You know, there's tech involved
with that. But it goes explaining how big
tech abandoned our government and country when their
workers protested defense related business.
Right? Because people that god forbid they should
have morals about how these merchants of death
are working with foreign mercenaries, working with genocidal
governments,
spending I mean, dumping weapons in places and
hands of people that they know are
extremists.
But, no,
care pointing these things out means you've,
abandoned our country.
And by the way, of course, conflating government
to country because that's what's important for technocrats.
Think of them as the same thing. It's
not. The government is not the country. You
are the country. They are supposed to represent
you.
The problem though is what they're trying to
tell you is you have to do what
we're what the industry says is right. Back
the weapons sales. Back the war. Because if
you don't, you're abandoning your government. But an
important quote,
which I always bring up
by,
Theodore Roosevelt. To announce that there must be
no criticism of the president or that we
are to stand by the president, right or
wrong, or you can read political party, you
can read
congressman at same point. But to announce that
there must be no criticism,
as we are to stand by them, right
or wrong, is not only unpatriotic
and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American people.
We have lost our way in this country
even if this was dishonest.
Servile, having or showing an excessive willingness to
serve or please others.
Yeah. Who do you think they're serving? Certainly
not you.
Goes on to say we should all be
reminded the American values that we all hold
dear, including our democracy, exist only because of
our ability to defend ourselves. Again, I made
comments about this yesterday. Our technology companies are
fundamentally
are o only protection from oppression.
I mean, really? They're literally trying to conflate
the general idea of technology
with government.
Guys, that's technocracy.
This is not even transparent, or this is
not even attempting to be this is transparent.
They are not even trying to hide this.
I think that's scary
while they're literally working with a genocidal government.
You pick which one.
Now in that same point, of course, I'm
and can't not include the point about Israel's
complete infiltration
of many different governments. In this case,
the infiltration of the US tech field in
light of the Lebanon pager attack. Alright. So
think about what we just highlighted for you
and what they're willing to allow.
Why would we then allow them to build
out a technological structure around everything?
Doesn't that seem a little bit dangerous knowing
what these people are literally involved in, what
they are okay with? That should be terrifying
to all of us.
So on that last note, I wanna include
very quickly because we just went over the
60 minutes thing from yesterday, and Steve played
it this morning on AM Wake Up. You
know, where Leslie is basically an extoll,
almost giddy, laughing about how they're discussing them
bombing using pagers. And 10 years, she claims,
that they put these pagers out and then
10 years later, blew them up.
I mean, even if you argue everything of
their story is true, that alone makes it
terrorism because there's no way you can confirm
that those wouldn't end up in the hands
of children or in a pile in a
nursery somewhere or sent to the United States.
How the hell do you know what's gonna
happen in 10 years?
So Saeed Mohammed points out, this is one
of the injured Hezbollah commanders, obviously, he's being
facetious, that 60 Minutes and Lesley Stahl were
gloating about. They love how their genocidal Zionist
allies bomb hospitals, rape prisoners, and maim kids
by planting bombs and pagers.
Just so you realize, this is a very
public this is
it's undeniable that the majority,
vast, were civilians
that were hurt in this attack.
4000
civilians were hurt. This is simply one of
them, and he's a child.
That's the reality.
Here's another one.
Asal, Asad Abukamal
points out 60 minutes did not show these
victims of the pager's plot in Lebanon. Alastair
Stahl was laughing as she was listening to
Mossad agents and how they detonated their pagers.
Here's 3 more kids.
Mamed by their pager attack. Imagine if even
if everything of the main narrative was true,
and the exact thing happened in any other
context, it wasn't Israel, we already know what
would happen. They would be and rightly so,
screaming terrorism.
Because it is.
Now considering what we just went over and
using and the specific point about using social
media,
whether it's artificial intelligence and x AI programs,
DARPA to Twitter, to basically use you
to train their artificial intelligence. Using your engagement
with it to be able to give it
to train it to be able to explain
what it's doing in a way that you
might accept. Right? That would then make you
trust it. That's what they are discussed in
these in all of those studies. It's about
gaining the public's trust.
So that in the art itself could be
the agenda and and just a way to
trick you into thinking that. Obviously possible.
But then realize that they fold that into
social media engagement, being able to tell whether
you have a mental illness, using that in
conjunction with digital twins to be able to
map out what might happen. All of this
is being openly discussed.
Right? So consider that in some of the
recent, I would argue, psychological operations that might've
just taken place on these platforms.
One of which was the Magdeburg discussion. Not
that that was in any way fake, but
the way that it was then covered after
the information became very clear that this guy
was a Saudi, Masad connected Zionist
who was actually very anti Muslim. And, I
mean, there's interviews posted where he's openly going,
I am the most anti Islam person in
the world, or something like that. Paraphrased.
And all of this got deleted.
Twitter deleted the account and then reposted the
account with all of those things gone. And
it's all documented. All these things have been
saved, archived, screenshots. I've shown it all. And
the point is that they
show these tweets that we're pro Israel, that
we're pro AFD party, that Elon Musk is
rapidly supporting right now, whatever your thoughts are
on it. And they why do you think
they hid that? Now even if you think
it's just because they thought it would hurt
what they do believe in or they genuinely
think will help Germany, It is still
transparently
dishonest to do that.
So here's what Warner Bonner said. He said
this effort deleted the terrorist account Twitter. He's
talking about we're talking about, Elon, the Twitter
account,
which had in evidence via thousands of tweets
supporting Israel, Judaism, and figures like Elon, which
he was a big supporter of, and is
now spreading the false idea suggesting that he
did this in the name of Islam. So
that's the craziest part about it, is this
guy knows that's not true.
Right? So in woke wokeness is making this
about because right here's where interestingly enough, some
of the corporate media, I pointing what he
was doing.
Saying that he didn't like Muslims, saying that
he was an ex Muslim, saying that he
was pro Israel.
And it is easily proven. Okay? You could
all you could also point out that maybe
he lied about all that. But my point
is that that's what all the evidence shows.
They deleted all that and then go on
to continue to make it about
Muslims attacking Christians,
even though you can prove that's not true.
So they have a transparent agenda. Even worth
knowing that they'll lie about it, to force
in something that they to get a reaction
out of you that will then cause violence
against innocent people. I mean, the in and
of itself, you can call that terrorism, or
at least terror
in the it's a pursuit of terrorist acts,
because that's pretty disgusting to know. At the
very least, it's dishonest.
And this engagement was going back and forth,
and I was just pointing out the the
evidence that is there that a lot of
people don't seem to want to find even
though it's very, very obvious.
Now the basically, this was Viva Fray asking
for the evidence. This person was simply saying
that he got quiet, now that the evidence
is clear. This person says, yet, oddly, we've
all seen this is just one of the
examples, the pre November tweets because they basically
deleted everything from before November.
And one of the main I am a
former Muslim and I closely follow the stories
of those who leave Islam and, you know,
the point is that they're still trying to
make this about him attacking them because he's
a radical Muslim.
The exact opposite is true. And so my
point is to consider how the way we
respond and engage with these things, whether they're
able to just force a false narrative on
top of what we can see, like with
the the gods of genocide,
and actually get enough momentum if they're using
artificial intelligence and algorithmic manipulation.
I think we're being trained right now or
at the very least, they're trying to suss
out whether this works or whether we're letting
us train these models. I think that's a
huge part of this.
Or the drone conversation. Right? We just talked
about this.
Right? We and this is very easy to
see. The interesting drone conversation is now very
clearly kind of materialized to what we all
thought it would be, which is ultimately forcing
in
sir Orwellian surveillance and, legislation.
A bipartisan version, right, that Rand Paul did
push back on. He blocks a bill to
authorize
local and state authorities to track drones. He
makes it clear. Oh, I shall play the
clip for you. It's right here.
The bill before us would grant law enforcement
significant authority to intercept private electronic communications
without consent.
For example, the bill would allow the government
to conduct dragnet surveillance of the phones, innocent
Americans traveling through US airports as long as
the government claims they are doing it to
neutralize a drone.
Which means that's been happening for 10 years.
Now I'm not saying that as an absolute
fact. I'm saying that's always what I point
out. When they make the when that if
we know that technology is possible, some level
of your government has already been using it
on you to find out if it works,
just to to apply it to national security.
So when he's saying that, I'm willing to
bet you right now they're already doing that,
and this is to to normalize
you get you to accept what they've already
been doing.
My opinion, of course, but worth considering. Now,
I mean, right there is enough. The point
is simply he came out and told you.
Because of the drone conversation, this is gonna
be this is being forced in, and we
shouldn't support it. Now who does that truly
implicate right now? Obviously, Biden isn't is technically
in control. He's don't but he the Biden
Trump is the president-elect, and we've already seen
a lot of action being being kind of
spearheaded, at least being framed as because of
what Trump is doing. And, alternatively,
most of the right conversation right now is
that Biden is in
is MIA.
Who's actually in control? Where is he? He's
not even around. Okay. So if the point
is
Biden
lie you know, lied about these drones to
force this in, which seems like it doesn't
make sense seeing as how they've been telling
you they're not dangerous. So then why would
it make sense to force this in on
a not dangerous claim?
It just seems like right now the partisans
are desperate to make this about Biden versus
Trump and just are not even listening to
the narratives. Because at the end of the
day, at the end of the day, what
we're talking about is Biden
with less than a month left now or
maybe exactly no. Less than a month.
Arguably, they're claiming forcing in legislation that will
give Donald Trump extreme surveillance power? Like, why
does that even make sense? Because I'm already
seeing these conversations. Like like, I think it
was bad kitty. He was like, what? Biden
did this to force this in just before
Trump gets in power. It's like, you trying
to tell us they're working together? Because that's
what it sounds like to me. That's what
I think.
So it's very interesting. Either way,
removing the partisan
mania from all of this. The point is
your government
pointed to something,
drones that were always there, drones they flew
out, Israel drones,
nuclear bombs, sniffing drones, whatever. You pick one
of the many narratives Alex swore with the
truth 14 days straight, and you decide whatever
it was,
they used it to force this through. That's
just at least in one example.
Or they're trying to anyway is the point,
which is one of the things ZeroEdge pointed
out, I agreed with. I think that was
the one of the most logical.
And so, before we can come to that,
so I just wanted to I want you
to think about the idea of how these
things are used. Right? So was that a
way to to train to to see how
we would respond?
Like, or whether we if they could get
away with hyping basically nothing actually happening or
using social contagion, convince people that something was
happening. Or or, you know, maybe there were
real drones. But I proved to you that
there was obviously fake information going around or
fake orbs they were pointing to, which I've
seen that same orb image come up every
other year for different narratives and different arguments.
You know, it's just it's it's always the
same thing, which doesn't have to mean that
it's not there.
But realize that what they're doing with all
of this is watching how you engage with
this stuff, how you're using Grok and you're
engaging and and they're
you're basically doing something that in other time
frames they would have been paying for to
train to work. You are doing it for
free. As as often the point is, if
there's if you're not paying for this app
or service, then you are how that work.
It's,
you are the you are the, the product
is the is the endpoint. Ultimately, if if
you don't see if they're not you're not
paying for it that you are the product.
If if I I think that's the right
way to frame it. Point being that they're
using you. They're your data, your engagement. You
are what they're using to profit, so they
don't need you to pay for anything.
So it's just important to think about. And
so the drone thing, just to make sure
you understand, has now right now culminated the
idea that it's
rushing in more control. Now, my point is
the the people pointing out the drones more
than anybody have been the right.
And so how does that make sense? You're
saying they tricked all of the right to
point to something that they then use to
rush in surveillance powers that they give to
Trump?
Doesn't make much sense to me other than
they're all doing this together, which I do
agree with. But on top of that, we're
talking about the the,
what was it? So you got Rand Paul
and the drone surveillance conversation.
There was another point I was gonna make
about that, which I just think is is
just fascinating. So there I mean, either way,
the the outcome
is more of what we all point to
from Palantir, the drone surveillance, the Israeli involvement,
all right on the surface. And talking about
biometric scans, this is all what Rand Paul
is talking about is the is the drone
dynamic surveillance using these things for facial recognition.
That's why I use one of those images
today. And these are the companies involved with
this who are benefiting from the narrative. So
not only do you have the artificial intelligence
angle, which I'm just framing today because that's
what we started with, but you also have
the real world application of this stuff. The
surveillance aspect, the invasive aspect, the control structure.
And all because they wanna go, you know,
immigrants
or random drones
with very little information to back up a
lot of these conversations, usually rooted in something
important and true, which is always how these
things work.
Now, lastly, on this first part,
in the kind of context of how we're
being played, I just wanna point this out
in the health dynamic. Andrea Andrea Lynn
just simply says Trump's COVID response 2020 verse
2024.
December 2020, we are delivering millions of doses
of a safe and effective vaccine that will
soon end this terrible pandemic and save millions
of lives. It is truly a Christmas miracle
or not, or one of the most deadly
and dangerous and nefarious things we've ever seen
come through.
But are we really still pretending he doesn't
know that? Well, let's jump forward. 2024.
Operation Warp Speed saved 100 of millions of
lives.
And she asked a simple point, is the
self proclaimed father of the vaccine a complete
moron who was still fooled, or is he
knowingly complicit? I really don't see another option.
But many people just don't wanna see it.
I think that's very important to consider. And
how this is all working in the direction
of convincing
training you in very particular ways. Now, in
the context of free speech, which is also
a very clear overlap to the con the
the Twitter dynamic,
as they're literally pretending to save something that
they're absolutely
actively destroying
and are telling you they're going to with
the concept of antisemitism. And by the way,
are currently censoring that conversation or people that,
you know, cross certain lines even though it
would very much so be considered in the
realm of free speech. Just, like, like, listen
to what,
Ted Cruz says here.
Exactly to a t what Trump has said
many times on the campaign trail.
Enforce the law, especially
against
universities
across
this country.
Now I wanna say first, by the way,
this is how they get the Republicans
to buy it. Some that might
push back. We'll enforce the law. Okay. First
of all and that's when they go, all
he means is when they break the law.
Well, no. That's not what they mean because
you they've been very explicit about in but
people going after Israel or anti semitic protests
or
Jew haters will get out of the country,
end of sentence.
Let's not let's let's be let's not be
let's not be childish about this. Either own
it or don't. The point is you know
what they're saying, and that is protected no
matter how gross those opinions may be under
the idea of free speech. They're ideas. You
can express what you want.
But when they say the law,
they want you to pretend that, well, it's
because she only means, like, the violence of
it, and that's not true. But even secondarily,
are we not are we aware that laws
are simply
of their if they are count repugnant to
the constitution
via the supreme court ruling of Mabry versus
Madison, they are null and void.
I there's I could point them plenty of
examples. I simply argue that shows how broken
this country is rather the government is. No
longer cares about the constitution while pretending to
use it.
So the problem is
that we're in a position where we have
laws that are unconstitutional.
Oh, so when he says the law, well,
all he means is we're we're gonna and
they already have some, pass a law that
says
antisemitism
is a crime.
They're already doing that, mostly led by Republicans.
Okay? So that's important to think about. So
that, by the way, would be a violation
of your free speech, which would mean it
would be null and void. They're gonna enforce
it at the barrel of a gun,
but think about what that means. And so
as he goes through this, just recognize that
he's telling you, we are going to censor
your speech for Israel.
And, yes, this also means violence and everything
else. But, yeah, if you are of the
mind that they are not going to go
after you if you simply say Israel is
a killer,
Israel is murdering Palestinians, or let's just say
you say something actually racist,
it's still free speech.
Are you gonna be arrested for saying something
racist about Russians? Probably not.
If you don't understand why that's important to
recognize the contradiction there, again, I argue that
you just don't want to see it.
But listen to what he says.
Force the law, especially against universities
across this country.
The anti Semitic protests we've seen at universities
will end next year.
Right there. That that's pretty damn simple. So
now you're out you can't you can't protest
if they claim you're anti Semitic,
and we will shut you down, violate your
rights. But let's also recognize that just because
they claim it's anti Semitic, who decides that?
Well, we've already very clearly shown that they
think of Palestinian flag as anti semitic. They
think from the river to the sea is
anti semitic. They think free Palestine is anti
semitic. That's none of those are hyperbolic. Those
aren't jokes. Those are very clearly stated by
people like Ted Cruz.
So
if a
flag that is a national flag of Palestine
or simply saying free Palestine then gets contorted
into kill all the Jews and that becomes
then you're racist, which means then we can
shut your protest down, will you recognize that
has nothing to do with antisemitism? That has
that to do with them shutting down a
protest they disagree with.
And we'll use that excuse however they see
fit, which is basically the 101 Zionism act,
about the
go to reaction of Zionism. I was gonna
say, like, 101, like, you know, basic reality
that they scream antisemitism over anything they don't
want you to see, including murdering children in
real time.
If you violently
protest, if you
threaten your fellow students,
you will be arrested. You will be expelled.
And if you're a foreigner,
you will be deported.
Yeah. That by the way, hey, Ted Cruz.
That's also called the law currently.
Right? Okay. So, yes, I get it. There
are examples that both sides, by the way,
that aren't enforcing the law all over the
place. But does that mean we pass new
laws then? No. The point is enforce the
law,
which is in one way what they're trying
to argue with these these peep the the
college professors are enforced the law, but we've
already proven very clearly that all they're doing
is conflating things that are apps are very
clearly protected under your constitutional rights with something
that's
racist, which even then would still be protected.
And then claiming
was and the last part was
You will be deported. So, yeah, the law
is already being in place. Like so, again,
what he's saying is violence.
So the first part was clear, and then
he they follow-up with this to try to
make other people think all he means is
the violence.
Okay. What about all the Zionists that were
being outwardly, rapidly violent on video and nothing
ever happened to them?
But it's applying it one sidedly. But the
point would be that anybody, left or right,
Palestine supporters, Zionist supporter, or Israel supporter,
if they commit a crime, then arrest them.
But what they're trying to claim is that
we'll shut down these anti semitic protests because
they're violent.
Apparently, they're they're sentient. Apparently or rather apparently
they're
shoot. I got the worst sentiment in my
mind. You know, psychic.
How in the world are you gonna know
that? And overly, the the the vast majority
of information has already shown that these people
were almost entirely nonviolent,
and most of them were run by Jewish
organizations. They never want you to know that
though, like Jewish forces for peace. They were
the ones that were largely funding and spearheading,
in particular, the ones that they were highlighting,
like Columbia University.
And we're gonna see the Department of Justice
and the FBI
follow the money, go after the money, cut
off the money. We're going to see universities
that tolerate antisemitism
having their federal funds cut off. Yeah. Yeah.
But we're gonna keep funding the genocide, though.
Right? So we're gonna we're gonna make a
big story about something that is not really
what's going on. Right? We're gonna we're gonna
track these. We're gonna cut off funding that
goes to anything Palestinian adjacent, which is what
he's talking about. But we're gonna keep funding
and shout you down for calling out the
funding of a genocidal government who we'll get
into in a second is praising and broadly.
I mean, they are standing up and screaming
from the rooftops that they're killing children, that
we're murdering innocent people because they don't deserve
to be alive. And people like Ted Cruz
are very aware of that. And not only
do they not care, they're shouting you down
from pointing it out and telling you we
have to stop the funding that go to
groups that are standing up and screaming, don't
let the genocide continue.
That's what he's doing right there. Now, of
course, within that dynamic, you're gonna find people
that probably should have lost their funding or
are doing something wrong, But that is not
the point. The point is they are broad
stroking an entire conversation to hide Israel's genocide
with your tax dollars, and they stand up
and they cheer because Ted Cruz said the
buzzwords.
Because partisans are easy to manipulate.
Not all of them, but the TeamSport Poltic
side of this is very obvious. They're clapping
seals jumping up to yay for whatever they
point in front of them because that's what
the party said.
I don't think that's the majority.
And then Bill Ackman
says this,
I like this straightforward approach.
Of course, he does. Why did we have
to wait for a new administration for this
to happen?
Just it's, you know, all these people have
an agenda like crazy right now, and it
was just always about trying to go Biden
bad, Trump good.
Because they're rap they're incredibly benefiting from Trump
administration.
So and that's not good bad. Biden's just
as bad as Trump. The point is they're
benefiting from what's going forward. So
why didn't they do it then? We're gonna
do it now because we're the best. So
it's all good.
I simply said when he asked why,
I said, well, because some of us still
believe in free speech.
Now, of course, that's not to say that
Biden does. My point is about anybody who
does recognize this is a problem. Like, why
did we have to wait for this to
happen? Maybe because some people were still saying,
wait a minute. Isn't that a violation of
our rights? But Bill Ackman and Ted Cruz
don't care about your rights. In fact, they
care more about protecting Israel
than American rights.
So this is your make Israel great a
good moment, guys. Recognize what's happening.
Zachary Foster responds to Ted Cruz and says,
if you think baseless hatred is a problem
on university campuses, maybe start with the leadership.
A dean at, which one is this?
Regent University named Michelle Bachman
has openly advocated for ethnically cleansing millions of
Palestinians from their homes. Here's just one example.
They have one industry in Gaza, and that's
terrorism. So it's time that Gaza ends. The
2,000,000 people who live there, they are clever
assassins.
They need to be removed from that land.
That land needs to be turned into a
national park.
My god. The ignorance just
flows out of her. It's just so disgusting.
Clever assassins. This girl this this because she
is an ignorant person or deliberately lying for
genocide. You you pick.
Are you literally trying to say so yeah.
What what time do we stop recognizing that
broad stroking an entire
civilization
is dumb, is ignorant,
is racist? Is you pick.
Every single Palestinian in existence are clever assassins.
Why don't people stand up and yell that
you're an idiot,
that you're disgusting? Because it's an agenda, and
people in this room are in line with
that agenda.
Or at least Charlie Kirk show,
And he's right. How is that not the
same thing? It doesn't even matter if you
wanna argue that they're all violent. You're literally
talking about an entire civilization
and saying that they shouldn't exist.
It's just
rank hypocrisy
right on the right on the surface. And
it's it's it's and the point is many
of them know that. They just argue that
it's okay because we're right.
Welcome to the partisan world.
And, again, the many, many, many, many different
clips showing you Donald Trump telling you censorship
is okay. You burn the flag, you're gonna
go to jail despite that being protected rights
as even Ron Paul has argued, shutting down
the Internet with Bill Gates because ISIS might
influence you. You know, all the things or,
you know, deal with the
take the guns due process later. You know,
all these things should matter to people that
wanna keep a track record of what they
actually do. Not what they say, what they
do. Or the many times like this one
that says, we'll remove the Jew haters from
the country. End of sentence.
There's no way to misunderstand that, guys. You
can hate what you want. And in fact,
what they're talking about is people that are
simply pro Palestine.
I'm not gonna say somebody who randomly hates
a Christian or a Jew just because their
religion is a good person. I think they're
disgusting.
You have a right to feel how you
wanna feel and express what you wanna express.
It's amazing how Republicans of all people are
the ones not pointing that out.
And here's just one of the clips showing
you why Donald Trump might be taking this
path. Because he's of the mind that the
Israeli government is supposed to control congress.
Very real. You know, the biggest change I've
seen in Congress is Israel
literally owned the Congress. You understand that. 10
years ago, 15 years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And I think you know exactly what
I what I'm saying.
They had such power. Israel had such power,
and rightfully,
over congress.
You know,
Israel was the most powerful
lobby
in the country 15 years ago.
Today, between Tlaib and AOC and all of
these people, what they're doing,
Israel,
they don't have the backing that they once
had. You'll give it to them. Yeah. I
have the I'm good. Yeah. Yeah. He's good.
Yeah. Obviously, that's the reality is they do
more than I think I've ever seen, but
they've lost a lot of it because of
the genocide.
But just recognize how shocking that is
that it rightfully so. Why you would argue
a foreign country had rightfully should have control
over our congress?
I don't understand why Republicans can't see how
that's a problem.
I mean, I I'm and, again, I I
can I always I shouldn't mix it up
as often as I do? I mean, conservatives
in the way I break that down. When
I say republicans, I generally mean the people
that don't care about the truth and I
know there's a middle ground in there. My
point though is that there's a lot of
good people out there that genuinely want what
they have been mistake, have been tricked into
thinking Trump is gonna do, in my opinion.
But when you come across something like this
or the endless amount of information that shows
the same thing, I just don't know why
they can't see what that shows you.
Now, in an interesting overlap,
Rotman shares this deranged. I do think Sean
Penn is kind of a maniac when he
he says, Sean the article is Sean Penn
compares Trump supporters to Al Qaeda. Says Trump
has Bin Laden.
Now, for all we know, that's an article
from, like, 10 years ago. It's how they
tend to roll in the partisan media. But
either way, it's not about the time frame
yet. The point is about realizing what that
shows. Sort of like calling anybody in a
red hat anti semitic
or you're all nazis because the trucker rally
and they had a red hat or whatever
it is. The lazy ignorant association
of anybody broad stroke. Yeah. Oh, yeah. It's
called broad stroking. What do you know?
You'd think people who just got done being
broad strokes antisemites
might reflect on why they shouldn't do that
to another group. But my point is it's
not the conserves doing that. It's the TeamSport
Politics Republicans driving the agenda, and too many
conserves are going along with it. It's the
same damn thing that happened during COVID 19
where you had too many democrats
driving aggressively that we should all blindly support
the agenda.
And there was a lot of liberals that
I engaged with myself that were very uncomfortable
about it. They were calling these things out,
but they chose to fall in line in
a lot of ways, and it's the same
dynamic.
My point is Elon Musk says Trump won
a majority of the electorate, which does not
mean what they love to pretend that it
means, by the way. So mister Sanity here
thinks a majority of Americans are Al Qaeda.
No. That's a false equivalency because first of
all and I'm a his point is incorrect,
and I'll show you what I mean with
that comparing what I'm saying. But first,
realize
Trump did not win a majority of the
electorate. Okay? The majority of people in this
country do not vote.
Every single year every single year, the majority
of people are people that do not participate.
Every time. And then within the people that
do, the majority of them, somewhat 40 something
percent almost every time, are independents.
And then you get the breakdown between left
and right, and that's supposed to represent the
whole country. That's how broken this is.
So, no, he did not win a majority.
He won a, I think it would be
a what do we call it? A plurality
of the people that voted.
Because realize the electorate,
it means people who are registered, I think,
registered to vote. Right?
Entitled you know, it says who are entitled
to a vote. So that means every American
who is over 18. Okay? Or rather, you
know, with some caveats, I guess. The point
though is that was not the case then
seeing as how most Americans do not. Then
he says he thinks the majority of Americans
are Al Qaeda, but that's not even remotely
true in the context of the information seeing
as how all he did get was a
small percentage of the people who voted left
and right. Interesting. But then on top of
all of that, let's realize that not everyone
who did vote for Trump, even within that,
is even truly supportive of Trump. They all
I I saw I more people than I've
ever seen in my lifetime in this conversation
before the election were going, god. They're both
terrible. I just don't know what to do,
but I think she's worse.
That's not the same as pretending that they
all want, yay, Trump. Save our lives. Like,
that's what these people are desperate to push
forward. These sycophants for the next direction of
technocracy with Trump leading the charge, like Elon
Musk, are trying to convince you every day
that everyone's on their side. It's just like
the COVID 19 in the left. It's the
same damn thing, or rather your government.
So when they say they think you're all
majority of Al Qaeda, maybe you should stand
back and and ask again to the first
point.
Doesn't that seem familiar?
Right? Doesn't it seem familiar when you're currently
calling
the left
a bunch of Muslim extremists or rather supporting
of terrorism in the in the Middle East
or, you know, whatever it is. The broad
stroking is going in both directions. And apparently,
if I mean, if you can't see that
you're only getting one side of it here,
again, it's a choice to not look at
it.
Recognize how easy it is to broad stroke
an entire group, and they use that to
keep you divided. They want you fighting the
other side. They want you to think as
the bad guy democrats trying to fight the
good guy republicans, and all they can do
is get you in the middle.
Instead of you standing back and looking at
what your government's doing around it all. Every
single
day. And right now, what's going on in
Israel, and Gaza, and Lebanon, and Syria,
is still easily the most important thing happening
in the world. And it is transparently
I mean, I don't just
horrifying.
So it just doesn't even that just doesn't
even come close to doing it justice.
So the last segment, which is a lot
here we're gonna get into, is about the
idea of what they're doing and the IDF
members admitting publicly what they're doing.
And yet we still can't seem to acknowledge
this or the power structures can. So I
first wanna point out,
I think this was the one. I was
first I wanna point some points about Syria
actually. But so I wanna point out that
we just did a show on 21st. If
you don't remember and you don't see us
talk about this, Trump has already at least
publicly stated that he is gonna go back
on his promise from Ukraine, and he's going
to continue funding the Azov movement. He said
that publicly.
Oh, yes. He could change. That's always the
case. But right now, the accurate reporting is
Trump has reneged on his promise to end
the war on day 1. If you're gonna
keep funding Ukraine,
very much so, that's gonna go the opposite
direction. Because Russia is not even remotely losing
in this dynamic. At the very least, they're
not you know, it's it's gonna be a
if you let this keep going, especially with
US support, it's gonna take a lot longer
than they would it's not gonna end on
day 1. Let's put it that way.
That is a and and yet they're not
framing it that way. They're gonna go, well,
give him the more weapons, we'll help it
end faster.
Okay. So you're just basically trying to move
the goal post like we told you you
would. The reality is that's not ending it
on day 1. It's gonna continue to fund
it just like we promised he would, sadly
enough. I hope I'm wrong. I hope it
changes when he gets there. Next,
as we talked about yesterday,
Trump to squeeze aid going into Gaza
has been reported by by I think it
was VOA and plenty of others. The Atlantic
Council was highlighting what they thought what he
might do, which is where that comes from.
But also Trump, rather channel 12, which I
think I grabbed here, maybe not. Maybe oh,
it's down here.
We'll come back to at the end. Channel
12, this is the tweet itself
from Israel, has tweeted,
Trump sent message to Israel. I will not
insist on humanitarian aid as Biden insisted. Now
look. It's very possible that Israel lied about
this in order to pressure Trump to do
it. In no way am I ever saying
because they said this, that makes the truth,
which is what people assume when you're dealing
with partisans online. You know my point on
this. It's just relevant because it's being reported
by a lot of people, including corporate media,
both in Israel and otherwise. And so it's
interesting to see that begin, and Trump has
not stood up and said no about this.
But as always, they could be making it
up. We don't know. But I I my
opinion, this is what's happening because it makes
sense with everything else that's going on that
they are going to continue to starve Palestinians.
That Trump and even worse that he says,
like Biden insisted,
which isn't even true. Biden was starving them
like like
right now, they're continuing to allow them to
not feed them. And so what that becomes
is
you frame it as we're gonna do what
Biden didn't, and so you trick them all
into going, yeah. So if he didn't, then
we want to. They're both doing the same
thing. They're on the same side. They're doing
the same thing. They're framing it differently
as always.
So I wanna make you want do you
remember that? So we're all he's already walking
back 2 main things
before he's haven't gotten into office.
Now, Thomas Massi, speaking on Syria,
put this out. He says that US designated
terrorist organization now runs Syria, which is true.
But it was the US and Israel that
brought about the overthrow of the Syrian government,
which is true. It's not a coincidence our
agencies did this shortly after Trump won the
election and before he took office. That is
so interesting to me.
Now I I certainly couldn't be maybe he's
right. Maybe that's the whole point. But, again,
I don't understand why that makes sense. What
do you think the objective is here? Why
why would Biden try to rush this out
before Trump takes office?
Trump supports what's going on here. He supports
what Israel's doing, and this is not my
opinion. These have been stated. He supports the
groups that have been there. He did last
time with Idlib, the conversation they're in, and
the ongoing occupation that supported these groups. He
supported the Kurdish element. He supported Turkey with
it. All of it. It's the same conversation.
Trump's occupation of Syria, which continued through Biden,
it's the same dynamic.
So when you're trying to pretend
that Biden continued to finish the project that
Trump was also involved in
before Trump took office, I don't that to
me seems like a lazy effort to make
it about Trump versus Biden again. Where the
I just think this ultimately amounts to benefiting
Trump just like the conversation of surveillance. Because
what that means is they now have unfettered
access to whatever they want in Syria, not
just the areas they were occupying.
And that they can use that to effectively
achieve a lot of other agendas, which they're
going to pivot towards Iran. Mark my words.
That's something that Trump and Israel are adamant
about.
So I just don't get that statement by
him unless he's just trying to tap into
partisan momentum,
I I don't agree with, but it's interesting
nonetheless. I think it's a common sentiment right
now to make it about anything bad. It's
all Biden, Biden, Biden rushed in before Trump
gets there despite how all these things seem
to be benefiting Trump's agenda and the technocratic
agenda and Musk and Teal and all of
it.
So the cradle points out in Syria,
this was yesterday, armed extremists set fire to
a Christmas tree in Hama, which we already
pointed to. This is happening all over the
place. We're seeing them destroy churches, and and
and execute, and torture and rape
religious minorities.
It is happening right now in Syria just
like it's happening in Gaza and anywhere else
they're present.
The point is, here is Netanyahu
wishing you a merry Christmas.
I wanna wish the Christian community and in
Israel and around the world, except the ones
that were raping in in Syria, a very
Merry Christmas.
You've stood by our side and Israel defends
our civilization, he says. In English, of course,
because it's aimed at Western propaganda.
It's just it it really does turn my
stomach.
These people are absolute monsters. This guy is
a villain.
And he knows what he's doing.
As Mohammed Safa points out, and this is
what he's doing.
The birthplace of Jesus, the birth the birthplace
of Jesus is getting bombed
on Jesus' birthday. Now, technically, I'm specifically, you
know, to be accurate, it's I don't I
argue that December 25th is not the birthday
of the the the birth of Jesus. The
date is not accurate for many reasons. But
either way, the point is that's when we
celebrate it.
And the point is that they're bombing that
location. And many of them, many historical Christian
points in Gaza.
Sad. Bethlehem.
Plenty of other historical names that we would
remember.
And that's what it looks like now.
But Merry Christmas though, by what Bibi wants
you to wants you to think.
Aaron Mate, lastly, quickly. We pointed this out
yesterday. I decided to go over it again
because I made the point yesterday, but I
did it quickly. There there's articles now going
around about
see, the Syrian doctors who claimed at the
time that Assad didn't gas people now come
out. At least they report that they come
out. I don't even I can't verify that
they're even existing at this point, but that
reports are coming out through Israeli media and
other as aspects of it. This is French,
press freight agency
saying
we were coerced to lie, and he did
gas everybody, which is just a narrative at
this point, consider it, but realize that all
the evidence is still there. It didn't change.
They lied about it. People like Robert Fisk
and Aaron Mate and
everybody who was not lying about this, even
the OPCW, if you remember. They're they people
resigned in protest that they were lying about
the report for crying out loud. And now
you get, same as always, lockstep agenda to
lie about it after the fact, and it
shows you the kind of influence Israel and
the US have through world media. Which they
just got them telling you that we can
influence anything in the world.
But Aaron breaks this down just like I'm
saying, you can read it for yourself saying
that they're lying about this. You know, and
it it just it's it's worth breaking down
that really asking why this is being pushed
forward. Now, I think it's just like we
talked about yesterday with the lie about Assad
getting divorced. It's just this petty propaganda coming
from petty people.
But it's all about trying to demonize and
undermine what Syria was
as they completely destroy it. Now, the people
doing this, by and large, are the Israeli
government and the IDF.
Now, realize that there are people around the
world. I'm gonna end with one of those
points as well.
And we're ending a US member of congress
pointing this out. But in this case, Poland,
the Polish government has now reportedly confirmed that
they'll arrest Netanyahu.
And I believe that's supposed to I think
that's his ancestral homeland, if you will.
The point is that they're gonna arrest him.
If he goes back to the 80th anniversary
of the liberation of Auschwitz,
which he wants to. And so now it
turns out that he's apparently not gonna go
because we're gonna get arrested. Good.
I hope their entire life becomes like that
because they're criminals and deserve to be in
prison. And I think right now, we're seeing
more and more people find the courage to
actually do what's right.
Suppressed news in regard to this hospital which
we briefly pointed out yesterday, and there's been
a development sense like I said on the
show.
An Israeli robot, as you can see in
this video,
is rolling up to the door, right there,
to place a bomb by the door.
Is it playing? Yeah.
Oh, I thought it was funny. I thought
that was the
oh, so it's the big box.
When I first looked at this, I thought
it was this and this is,
the the little what do you call them?
MRAP or whatever it's called. This divide the
big truck here dropping off the box. At
first, I thought it was the one by
the door. But so this has been pretty
broadly reported discussion. Because in the Israeli media
is reporting on this, by the way. They're,
you know,
sell saving the,
the Kamal Abin Hospital as as everyone they've
done before. Right? The point is they they
a robot places a large box containing a
massive amount of explosives
right in front of the gate of Kamal
Abhin Hospital,
which has been under siege for months.
The explosion of this box could destroy the
entire area.
Then I went on to show you, you
know, this was on the 23rd.
This is inside the hospital.
K. This is what's going on. This is
on the 23rd. No. Well, this is the
21st. Excuse me. But it's on 23rd. This
they hadn't gone in the the box is
outside.
You've got babies in incubators. You've got people
in beds with arms amputated. People that elderly
people, sick people, starving people are in beds
in this hospital.
Here's the footage showing you the children before
we even tell you what happens next.
And most of these children are suffering in
here because they're not able to get the
treatment they need or they are malnourished
or they're missing limbs because they were attacked
by Israel, or they were shot in the
back by a sniper bullet. We've already shown
you all of this.
So the point,
seeing all these children and elderly people and,
you know, these are all people they're sheltering
in this hospital. Okay?
As of yesterday oh, before we get to
that, remember the last time this happened, this
is not new. This is from December 2,
2023.
Even ABC covered it. Abandoned babies found decomposing
in Gaza hospital weeks after it was evacuated.
Don't forget, we had on record a video
of the IDF members in the hospital being
told there are babies up there.
Evidence all over the place that they knew
they were there and left them to die.
And that shouldn't be surprising to you if
you know what they're doing, especially with what
we get into next, of these IDF members
telling you they all deserve to die. That
how they what they're carrying out against these
people in Gaza.
So here's what just happened.
As Tiberius
writes in October 2023,
the argument was, how dare you accuse us
of bombing a hospital? We would never do
such a thing. December 2024, we are using
robot guided bombs to destroy hospitals, and nobody
is saying a word.
This is how they normalize hell on earth.
This is late yesterday or middle of the
day yesterday. So I I got I think
I just stopped collecting information and this happened
right after we had broke down the show
yesterday.
2 robot explosives have just occurred around Kamal
Ahmed Hospital,
where we just showed you those children inside.
The explosion is violently shaking the area causing
severe damage to the hospital, injuries to the
patients and the wards. That's according to the
director of nursing at Kamal Ogden.
You got children in incubators that can't be
moved, and they're beginning to explode the building.
This is the reality of what Israel is
doing. There is no questioning this. This is
objectively clear. The world is seeing it. It's
about whether or not you choose to acknowledge
it.
Adam points out, can someone explain to me
why dropping 500 pound bombs
500 ton bombs on refugee camps is reported
as targeted strikes?
Using unless civilians are the real target.
He's right. Now here it says that it's
necessary to rescue the hostages with a weird
face. Investigations reveal Israel's air strikes killed hostages
held in Gaza last month. Every time,
their own hostages have made this clear. They
seem to be targeting these people, guys.
That's that is the cannibal directive.
And the point is they're bombing tents. There's
even even the Telegraph a while back and
reported that children are burning alive in these
tents.
Doesn't seem doesn't seem to influence Matt Miller
though, or Patel, or Kirby, or Biden, or
Trump, or RFK Junior.
Agnes Callamard from the Amnesty International, a human
rights organization,
says the consensus is emerging.
Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Thanks to
The Guardian for pointing out the increasing list
of organizations and scholars concluding that Palestinians in
Gaza are the victims of genocide.
Here is a short list. The main question,
though, is not whether a genocide is happening,
but what are our governments doing to prevent
and stop the genocide? Nothing as far as
I can tell. They're all helping it. Unfolding
in front of your eyes at 8 after
day, sample of organizations,
public statement over 800 scholars warn a potential
genocide in Gaza. That was October 15, 2023.
2023, November 2nd. UN experts call to prevent
genocide.
UN experts call to prevent genocide again on
the 16th November. December 26th, South African submission
to ICJ. You've seen most of these. The
point is all of them are saying the
same thing. UN repertoire, aren't just Albanese.
The UK judges and lawyers open a letter
to to concerning Gaza. April 3rd, 2024, May,
2024. Human rights groups or other human rights
watch reports.
Oxfam, forensic architecture. I mean, all of them
are going genocide. We can prove it. Embassy
just came out with a huge report saying,
we proven this is genocide.
That's the one right here.
Sample of legal genocide scholars. I mean, all
of these things are not from some fringe
blog. We're talking about the highest level entities
that in history have been the ones directed
we are pointed to,
to decide whether this is the case. And
they're all telling you the same thing.
But here is a fake human rights lawyer,
Arsen Otrovsky. And I'm saying that facetiously because
anybody who pretends to be human rights lawyer
but says things like this can't actually be
a human rights lawyer, whether or not they've
got the credentials.
Arsenotrovsky,
the Zionist maniac says no. The only consensus
is amongst rabid Jew haters and Hamas propagandists
like amnesty
and your fellow
travelers human rights watch. My god. So now
the leading human rights groups in the world,
including Bethsalla, by the way, which is an
Israeli human rights group, are all apparently anti
semitic Jew haters for pointing out objective crimes
committed by a government. Because that makes sense.
Right? And of course, I did the same
thing I tend to do. And I said,
well, you're a clown. And I said, you're
here is a Jewish doctor
coming back from ID telling you the IDF
are quote, killing exclusively children. Almost exclusively.
And of course, it's a warning tag, like
it does every time I post it, even
though nobody else seems to.
And it's it's just on the surface of
the conversation.
These people are drowning in these lies.
All they can do is say, you ain't
Jews.
When clearly she does not. When clearly, what
we're highlighting is
governments
murdering
innocent people,
whatever their religion.
And he doesn't care. In fact, he cares
so much about hiding that that he's willing
to attack people who are not even remotely
doing something, you know, that are what he
claims they're doing.
Now, again, I showed you this recently. Just
the point was, this video is posted like
we keep talking about.
I posted it again and get the warning
even though he didn't above. And this person
says it's covered.
And I just thought it was interesting. Brent
posts the same bit, literally the same even
like, the video that I share
and has not gotten it. It's like it
just shows you that it's about somebody recognizing
that that video will get reach through TLav,
which I hope he doesn't get a tag,
you know. Well, I bet you if I
share it, he will. We'll find out. The
point is it's just about getting the information
out there. Right? And these are these people
are killing children, almost exclusively.
Now I thought,
now, I'll wait to I'll wait to play
the first part of that clip when we
get to the next segment. But here again,
everyone sees this guys.
I'm really I'm not And it's not hyperbolic
right now. We have to be clear about
how clear How world
aware the world is aware of what's happening.
And this is a member of the United
Nations.
His name is Chris Sidoti telling you because
and this guy is an expert
on
criminality
in regard to governments and so on. What
he has to say, I think, is important.
And
the the the Israeli army is the most
moral army in the world.
I mean, this this is something that
is said repeatedly
by the the current prime minister of Israel,
Netanyahu.
On one recent occasion, he walked it back
a bit
and he said, one of the most moral
armies in the world.
Now,
I I don't have the expertise and I
don't have the authority
to make assessments of morality.
Netanyahu
may,
but but I don't.
So, you know, I don't know whether it's
one of the most moral armies in the
world or not.
But but what I do have expertise
in and what I do have authority to
do is make assessments of criminal conduct.
And we've done that in relation to the
recent events, and you can see that in
the report.
And the only conclusion you can draw is
that the Israeli army is one of the
most criminal armies in the world,
but I'll leave morality to Netanyahu to determine.
Right.
The world says the expert on whether you're
a criminal, you know, for for governments. But
let's keep pretending like it has it's all
lies. He just must hate Jews. Right?
That's that's how lay that's how completely flimsy
this is. The only response is you just
hate Jewish people. But there's no there's I
mean, that's always a possibility.
Where's the evidence?
Are we now at a part in the
world a a part, a stage, I guess,
or a are we at a place where
they can just
accuse you of whatever works to hide what
you're saying? I mean, that's where we've been
for a very long time. I think that's
changing.
But what now is becoming clear is that
they're,
I guess, exposing that they just don't have
any other they don't there's not a plan
b. They just gotta keep yelling that you're
racist as that continues to almost inadvertently expose
the fact that they're lying about it.
Saul Saul Saniphorth
plays a a Sky News clip. And this
is a this is,
Bushra Khaledi from Oxfam.
One of the many other groups that we're
told to look to in situations like this.
Well, and not not that we should blindly
trust. Like every other institution, it can be
manipulated, but the point is they're standing up
even though they're mainstream and saying a situation
in Gaza is an apocalyptic
nightmare.
Situation in Gaza is just nothing short
of an apocalyptic
nightmare.
Families are starving. Children are rummaging through rubbish
for scraps of food and, you know, entire
Palestinian communities are being
systematically cut off from life saving aid. What
we've noticed, from our analysis on the number
of trucks, only
12,
trucks of food and water in two and
a half months
have entered the North Gaza governorate with
12 in 2 and a half months.
Now when they give you the full picture,
which I'll give you to go to a
second, it shows you just the whole of
Gaza.
But in Northern Gaza, where there's at least
tens of thousands of people that's been disputed,
Twelve trucks in two and a half months.
This is this is deliberate starvation. Like, it
shouldn't even be contentious to point this out
as this seems to be pretty broadly accepted
by most honest people in the world, and
even just by most people in the world.
Danny Ramcourt
makes an interesting statement, which I'm gonna be
interviewing him coming up soon about the kind
of rehashing the information around the history of,
you know, the lie around COVID 19 and
his amazing study about whether they they there's
just been a complete lie, which I do
think is his math makes obviously the case
that it could've been. And I do agree
that seems to be the most likely at
this point. But I wanna I wanna re
revisit this with him and go through some
new information. And but the point is on,
23rd of this year,
of December of this year, he said, at
first, I thought those IDF whistleblowers who said
Israel let October 7th happen
rather than stop it were off on some
tangent.
And in parenthesis, he says, I sided with
the analysis of Scott Ritter. He goes, now
having seen Israel's actions in Gaza,
Palestine,
Lebanon,
Syria,
Yemen, Iran,
and seeing Trump's embrace of Israel and embrace
of war with Iran, it seems entirely plausible
that Israel intended to use October 7th as
the pretext for all of this.
It also did not it also did much
of the killing on that day.
See, this guy this is what I love
about Danny. He's very analytical about the but
he he if he has seen the evidence,
and now he shifted that this is what
an honest person does. This shows integrity.
And I think that's very important and powerful
because he's a very smart man. And the
interesting part about this is that what he's
highlighting is the so, basically, the point is
about if you don't remember the Hannibal directive
in October 7th and the provable evidence,
which I think I have right here next,
I'll play some of it, of Israel ordering
that. That's been admitted by Israeli media now.
Not just that it looked like it or
it came to the same outcome, but they
ordered it, which means
kill our own people so they can't take
them for hostages. That's what it means.
So I agree. It was hard it's it's
hard to we have we would need to
wait for more evidence when this first started
to be able to make that claim.
Now as he's saying, we can look back,
and it seems very possible that this was
all, at least in some case, allowed to
rationalize the what they've accomplished in Gaza to
complete what they've always wanted to get rid
of them all and ethically cleanse the entire
area and begin building settlements and do so
on in Lebanon and same in Israel and
Syria. It's all coming to fruition.
But what's interesting though
is that this on 7th, my argument has
always been, I still don't think that the
way this actually went down was what they
like, let's just say, hypothetically, they did want
to allow it to happen for this outcome.
And we're, let's say, using their influence
that's financially the financial influence that's been happening
right up until October 7th into Hamas,
which is important to understand. Don't forget that.
Which I'll in that I don't wanna play
the clip again, but I'll give you this.
Where is it?
Right there.
This is just Harratz itself
quoting this on 2 days after October 7th.
It quoting Netanyahu from March 19th in a
Knesset meeting saying, anyone who wants to thwart
the establishment of a Palestinian state has to
support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas.
That's part of our strategy, he says. And
it goes on in the clip in the
quote to say, to keep pal Gaza divided
from the West Bank. That is the reality
of this, as well as the fact that
you can see that even,
Haraz was reporting
that in 2020, they had sent the Mossad
chief to urge for Cutter to continue giving
them financial aid. Like, there's just no way
to hide all this stuff. The point in
all of that is that I still think
that I think post 2006
and a lot of time between then that
a lot changed.
Lot the whole dynamic of this change, and
more and more people were growing up and
becoming willing to fight back. And I think
that they lost they didn't and that wasn't
exactly what we think of as it was
in the beginning. But that doesn't mean that
Israel lost complete influence. So I'm of the
mind that it could have been something that
they influenced,
something to happen, but then Palestinian Islamic Jihad
was involved or other elements of Hamas and
they just lost control. That's that's why you
would argue that nobody was at these checkpoints
for hours. That just doesn't make any sense.
They pulled them
back. But that allowed then a lot more
to happen, and I think that's what triggered
the Hannibal directive because they lost control. But
that would be that's just me trying to
make sense of what we can't prove right
now. So but, nonetheless, I think it's powerful
to recognize someone like Danny Rancourt being able
to consider the reality that it's obviously possible
that they could have manufactured this. And that's
supposed to be wild, crazy conspiracy theory. No.
It's just an objective possibility
that anybody honest would consider with what we've
obviously seen now.
So I'm glad to see that.
Now I'm gonna play some of this. This
is Adam. It's about a 9 minute clip.
9 minutes, by the way, of Israeli testimony
proving the IDF killed their own people on
October 7th. This is probably one of the
most documented elements of this whole story, and
it is one of the most dismissed by
people that don't wanna see it.
You found the Where you stand where where
you stand exactly
were lying to couples, 2 men, 2 women,
handcuffed.
And inside this this,
this house were another 15
burned people.
Among them, 8 babies
in this form.
They were concentrated them,
and they, killed them, and they burned them.
Well, did you see? I
evacuated them. But why why is the destruction
then? I'm sorry. What what why is the
destruction? Destruction? Looks like a more like a
because of our tanks'
attack.
Bied on them. Yeah.
Yeah. Because they were blocked.
Also, don't forget the 8 babies burn is
a lie.
That's
thoroughly,
100% been proven even by Harrettes to be
an absolute fabrication. So he lied. He claimed
he saw them. He lied. Just like they
lied about babies in an oven, just like
they lied about babies on a clothesline, just
like they lied about 40 beheaded babies. They
lie, they lie, they lie, they lie. That's
what they've done.
So realize whether they let it slip or
not, he just made it clear that they've
bonded on this house. Nope. What I think
it was, Porat was her name. She's the
one that was in this dynamic and revealed
that they killed the hostages that she knew
were in there. Whether or not there were
her mass members in there, and that's part
of this point. Now we now know for
a fact that Hannibal director was ordered, which
is why that happened. In these houses, and
we need
to,
to conquer back the whole settlement, and it
couldn't be happened without the tanks.
Okay. So how many were how many were
here and then how many
survived? How many people No one survived
from this house.
From other buildings,
we we rescued many.
But from this house, 19 people
died.
Among them,
8 children.
And for the podcast, it's just in in
his Hebrew.
This is a guy recounting on how he
fired at these locations.
I'm just skipping past it because it's in
Hebrew for the podcast, but this is him
basically saying that.
Many many different examples of this.
This is the one of the girls saying
the same thing, that they were ordered to
fire. That she in this one, she says
they were ordered to fire on these houses,
and they knew they might be civilians, but
they did they weren't sure, but they didn't
end up doing it anyway. That's what that
clip says.
Here's colonel Naf Erez. This was the first
example we got where he says that looks
like a mass Hannibal, is what he said.
We later now past this point have then
gotten con confirmation that it was ordered, not
just that it looked that way. I think
this was their first effort to try to,
like, maybe slow it down. There's Yasmin Porett
telling us that they bombed these locations.
It's all in in Hebrew, that's why but
you watch it for yourself, guys. The evidence
is undeniable. So now let's finish with a
focal point on a couple different articles.
Now this is one of the main parts
I really want people to see. From Harrettes
sharing this information,
to the undeniable documentation,
to to IDF members posting videos of torture
and rape and manipulation and all sorts of
horrible things on their TikToks and Twitter accounts,
Instagrams, all over the place.
It's undeniable what's going on.
I just really wanna stress that this is
not some kind of a partisan opinion.
The fact that we can have Israeli leading
newspapers telling you what's happening and still have
this denied in world stages
is unbelievable. Now realize, they're not they're not
coming out and going, Haaretz is lying. They're
just acting like this information doesn't exist, And
that you're crazy for even bringing it up
when the leading mainstream Israeli paper is the
one breaking it down. So here is the
thread. You can read this for yourself. I'm
gonna go over more this in the article.
The title of the article is when you
enter Gaza, you are a god
inside the minds of IDF soldiers who commit
war crimes.
So this is written on December 23rd.
It says, I am horrified by the mass
killing of civilians in Gaza, and I am
disturbed by the impact of this brutality on
soldiers' mental health. Our soldiers are imperiled by
the government's inflammatory rhetoric and weaken and weakening
of the civilian and military justice systems.
Moral injury occurs when soldiers act against their
moral values and belief and beliefs or participate
as bystanders.
Those injured in this way experience guilt and
shame and are prone to depression, anxiety, and
suicidal impulses, which by the way we've seen
a lot of. There's this whole there's apparently
a whole out a break outbreak of IDF
members committing suicide, and I think that's why.
Because I realized just because we can clearly
prove, as this article will, that there is
a very dangerous
whether you maybe majority, a large portion of
the Israeli population, but idea for particular that
are sadistic,
sociopathic,
willing to murder children because they're, you know,
whatever you wanna talk about. But I don't
think that's literally everybody. And on top of
that, the point is that people who maybe
aren't sociopathic,
whether they are okay with doing or, you
know, do it or not,
it has a lasting psychological effect on you.
This is not human beings are not supposed
to commit extreme violence against each other, and
this is what it does.
And so people then go on whether they
do it or not or laugh about it.
They go on and have depression, anxiety, and
suicidal impulses, and it does and we're seeing
that long term effects on this society.
I mean, there are so many articles from
Haraz and other Israeli newspapers talking about this
long term byproduct of what they've been doing
to Palestinians.
And it says, Nafoor Ishaqreen
was the social welfare officer of 2 mechanized
infantry companies
stationed in the southern Gaza Strip. Now remember,
a lot of this go I think most
of this is before October 7th. And this
is between 1987 and 1993.
She talks with the soldiers,
and they opened up to her.
4 years later, it said the person writing
the article says, I supervised her graduate research
study on the company's brutalization.
She used confidential interviews to explore the moral
drift, they call it, the brutalities and the
consequent mental health issues. Our scientific article was
later published as the first chapter in an
edited book entitled the blot of of a
light cloud,
Israeli soldiers, army, and the society
in the intifada
in 2012.
The subsequent chapters reflect and expand on that
research. So realize that what we're highlighting next
is between 1987
1993.
So if you wanna keep pretending that all
of this is a response to October 7th,
pay attention.
It says they were written by an in
interdisciplinary
group of scholars in mental health, sociology, law,
political science, communication, and philosophy.
These are ones that were involved in breaking
this stuff down. There were also writers, artists,
and high ranking retired army officers.
And that's in addition to the people who
are provably part of the military who were
the ones part of her study that she
is documenting.
Now, it says, we identified 5 groups of
soldiers based on personality traits. Now, it's their
names have been removed. The point is the
different breakdown of the groups. And it says,
1, a small callous group was composed of
ruthless soldiers. Some of whom confessed to violence
before the draft.
These soldiers committed most of the severe atrocities.
And it seems that mostly these are the
higher level. And it says the power they
received in the army was intoxicating, it says.
Quote,
it's like a drug. They were laying this
to her. You feel like you are the
law.
You make the rules.
As if from the moment you leave this
the place called Israel and enter the Gaza
Strip, you are a god or you are
god.
They viewed brutality as an expression of strength
and masculinity.
Quote, I have no problem with women.
1 threw a slipper at me, so I
gave her a kick. And he said here,
and he pointed to her groin.
Broke all this here, he said. She can't
have children today.
This guy basically gleefully reports to her about
how, you know, I don't have a problem,
but they do that. You know, just this
this blithe sociopathic
mindset.
Then it goes and it quote says, x
this guy one of these people shot an
Arab 4 times in the back and got
away with a self defense claim.
Four bullets in the back from a distance
of 10 meters.
Cold blooded murder, they say. We did things
like that every day,
way before October 7th.
Hope this is reaching people. Quote, an Arab
just walked down the street, they say, about
25 years old.
Didn't throw a stone. Nothing.
Bang.
A bullet in the stomach.
Shot him in the stomach, and he was
dying on the sidewalk, and we drove away
indifferently.
These are all direct quotes from high level
IDF members. Now realize,
what do you think that does to the
people in this area? What do you think
this does to the kid if he survives?
Do you think he just goes on about
his day pretending Israel is a a democracy,
fighting for his rights?
No. It turns him into something they fight.
It turn this turns them this I mean,
what would you do? If you're watching people
indifferently murder, rape, and pillage, kill your family
in front of you, and call you a
terrorist, well, you're gonna go well damn right.
I'm gonna stand up and fight back. And,
obviously, that would not be a terrorist, but
in their mindset, that's exactly what they're doing.
They're turning you into what they need you
to be. It's the same thing Zionism does.
Whether that's the objective or not, the point
is these are people who are being oppressed,
who have legal rights to fight back whether
or not they're attacked. And yet when they
do anything, even if it's nonviolent, they get
called terrorists.
But what you're reading, what you're staring at,
what you're hearing is what terrorism actually is.
Number 2. A small, ideologically violent group supported
the brutality of this number one group without
taking part. It's sectioned out like this. And
it says, they believed in Jewish supremacy
and were derogatory towards Arabs. Moral injuries were
not reported in this group. Meaning, they didn't
feel they had moral drift or they were
hurt by what they did, which shows you
a level of, I think, sociopathy.
Number 3, a small inter corruptible group opposed
the influence of the callous and ideological groups
on the company's culture.
Initially, intimidated the brutal commanders,
they later took a moral stand. Oh, intentionally
initially intimidated by the moral command the brutal
commanders, and they later took a moral stand
and sent on to report
can't read right now. Went on to report
the atrocities to the division commander.
Then it says one whistleblower was severely harassed
and ostracized, of course, and it was necessary
to move him to another unit.
He was traumatized, depressed, and left the country
following discharge.
Think about that. Right? So someone tries to
go, maybe we shouldn't murder children.
He gets ostracized, oppressed,
probably worse, harassed.
They move into another unit.
Finally, he gets discharged, leaves the country.
That speaks volumes
about people that maybe have morals that don't
feel like they have a place.
Then it says, quote, I felt like
like like a Nazi.
That's what he said. It looked exactly like
we were actually the Nazis and they were
the Jews.
That's what he said to her before, you
know, later left the country.
Think about that. Now, he said, a new
commander came to us. It's a quote.
He went out with him on a the
first patrol at 6 in the morning.
This is long before October 7th.
He stops.
There's not a soul in the streets.
Just a little 4 year old boy playing
in the sand in his yard.
The commander suddenly starts running,
grabs the boy,
breaks his arm at the elbow,
and his leg, and he points to a
certain part of his leg.
Stepped on his stomach three times, and then
left.
We all stood there with our mouths open,
looking at him in shock.
He says, I asked the commander, what's your
story?
He told me, these kids need to be
killed from the day they are born.
When a commander does that, it becomes legit.
Meaning that other people who might not be
willing to do that, didn't think they could,
didn't didn't think about even consider it, maybe
realize they can and do it.
That is what the leadership is allowed, the
rulership.
Goes on to say there is much evidence
of alleged war crimes, as you guys all
know, in the current war and is easily
accept accessible. This is Harratz making sure you're
aware. Endless amount of information proving war crimes.
Lee Mordecai, who we've already referenced, is an
Israeli historian, has been collecting, categorizing, and regularly
updating the data. The data include reports by
reputable institutions, such as the United Nations, reporting
by mainstream media outlets, or I'd add amnesty,
Ocpham,
Human Rights Watch, Beth Sellum, on and on
and on.
And images and videos uploaded to social media
by them, by themselves.
There is documentation of shooting of civilians waving
white flags, including Israeli Jews, by the way,
as we saw from BBC,
In case you're
aghast by that claim.
Oh, wait.
Now I forget what it was.
Oh, SOS. There it is.
Hostage is shot by the IDF, put out
SOS sign written with leftover food. If you
remember the story. Right?
3 of them were out there with a
sheet with food written SOS.
They come out clearly as Israeli Hebrew speaking
Hebrew,
and they kill 2 of them immediately.
1 of them runs away. It's all in
the article. You read for yourself.
15 minutes later, they claim, they coaxed him
back out. Realize the whole time, this guy's
going, don't shoot me. I'm Israeli.
I'm on your side. Don't kill me.
And they finally come back come come back
out. And he walks back out, and 2
of them shoot him at the same time.
I make this point every time. I don't
know how you can misunderstand that.
That's the Hannibal directive. That's the kill zone.
That's everything. And that means they knew these
people were Israeli. Think about the sociopathic mindset
that allows that. What about the rest of
the people I imagine people in their unit
that are like, wow.
I'm not gonna say a word.
And as as soon as I can, I
am getting the hell out of here? You
just murdered Israelis that we're supposed to be
here to save.
Like, unless everybody is that crazy, which is
possible. Like, some of them probably got scared
as hell from that.
Because that means you could be next, should
you go a foul of what they're doing.
Some of these sociopathic
psychopathic commanders.
It says, there is documentation of them as
we just said, shooting
civilians with white flags, abuse of individual captives
and corpses,
burning houses without legal approval, vengeful destruction of
property, and looting. Additionally, Mordecai finds that, quote,
a minuscule number of investigations have been opened,
quote, compared to the evidence for committed crimes,
which shows you that it's all just feigned
investigation.
They don't care.
The eulogies at at a a, funeral, we've
actually covered this in the show, of reservists
who killed who, who was killed in Lebanon,
illustrate this shift. It says one speaker referred
to the the oh, his name is Ben
Natan's killing of a 40 year old Palestinian
who was harvesting olives with his children in
the West Bank.
Basically saying, love almost like lovingly remembering how
they murdered this Palestinian and burned his house
down to make themselves feel better. Remember, this
was his public statement. It wasn't you and
this is one of these rabid settlers. It
says members of his military unit recounted how
they boosted morale in Gaza by setting a
home on fire without approval.
They profess their commitment to continue with arson
and revenge in Gaza, Lebanon, and the West
Bank.
And we then you get the Kirby's and
Matt Miller's rescue acting like that. You're wrong
for thinking this, and they're following the law.
When then you have IDF members literally armed
supporting them as they do this.
And then Netanyahu and Smotrich Ben Gavir
praising it.
It says Max Kresh, a reserve fighter, declared
his opposition to participating in crimes against humanity
like flattening Gaza as they all have been
saying, which now we can see actually happened.
The result was, of course, severe social ostracism.
Right? He got ostracized
because he said maybe we shouldn't murder everybody.
Quote, they kicked me out of my team.
May they made it clear they didn't want
me.
He returned from reserve duty feeling, quote, mentally
crushed
because he realized
I'm a morally sound person in a very,
very dangerous position.
These people don't want you to care about
anybody's you know, think about how wild that
is. That means most of his unit, if
not all of them,
are okay with murder,
and he's not.
Now remember, said Thiemann,
the detention facility is like a microcosm of
brutalization in the current war, they write. It
became notorious
when an incorruptible veteran physician
reported now they use that the incorruptible with
a capital I is is meant to refer
to one of the groups they're pointing to,
not to say that they know he's incorruptible.
It's one of the categories of people they
were listening. Remember? And it says that he
was one of the physicians who reported signs
of severe sexual abuse in a tape detainee.
9 IDF Reserve soldiers were subsequently detained on
suspicion of aggravated of aggravated of aggravated
sodomy
and other forms of abuse. Now don't forget,
IDF members stormed that location demanding they get
released. People on mainstream Israeli media debated
why they should be able to write prisoners.
All very publicized except in your western media
and your government.
According to the media report, there are 36
investigations regarding deaths of detainees who were held
at said tiemann
on October 7th
or since then. Testimonies of released Palestinians gathered
by the Israeli human rights group,
B'Tselem,
that is a Israeli group,
indicate harsh,
arbitrary violence on a frequent basis.
Emiliation, degradation,
deliberate starvation,
and other abuse practive abusive practices like rape.
Soldiers expressed anonymously
how a discourse of hatred and revenge normalized
the abuses of detainees.
The art the the investigation by a bet
someone was called welcome to hell.
Legitimately, that's what it's called. The Israeli prison
system has a network of torture camps.
And, yes,
they do get into rape. They talk about
how this is happening in this prison. And
we all know this. This is a public
conversation.
He goes on to say, quote, I saw
sadistic people there. People who enjoy causing suffering
to others.
What was most disturbing was to see how
easily and quickly ordinary people can detach themselves
and not see the reality right in front
of their eyes when they are in a
different and shocking human situation.
Another IDF member pointing to other IDF members.
Now it says a reservist doctor stated, quote,
there is total dehumanization
here.
You don't really treat them as if they
are human beings. In retrospect, the hardest thing
for me is what I felt
or actually what I didn't feel when I
was there. It bothers me that I didn't
that it didn't bother me. There is normalization
of the process and at some point, it
just stop it just stops bothering. Well, I
don't know about that, but I certainly don't
think that would stop for me. But it
says, the dehumanization scared me, they go on
to say. The encounter with such dangerous attitudes,
which has become more more normal in our
society, speaking about Israel, was traumatic for me,
he says. I discharged myself from reserve duty
with a psychiatric's
help.
Meaning, it's scary because you're looking at people
who are
monsters, who on a draw on a on
a on a dime
could turn and you could be the focus.
Because suddenly, you're a risk now. It's like
dirty cops. Right? You're if you're the only
cop going, I don't know. Maybe this is
wrong. Suddenly, all of them are looking at
you, and all of a sudden, you're the
one that could put them in prison. Suddenly,
you're a problem.
You don't think that immoral person that crosses
their mind when they're watching the people torture
people in real time,
they know that could become them.
It says our government's rhetoric of hatred and
revenge, which has been reinforced by its determined
undermining of the justice system,
led to excessive retaliation and mass killing of
civilians in Gaza.
Remember,
the
your government wants you to believe that they
have
a fully functioning judicial you know, the, independent
judiciary
when they don't. When by every single metric
you can prove that that has been broken
by Netanyahu, by what they're doing right now
and what I've been doing for years.
And on that note, I'll grab this too.
It's the one one of the main ones
I made the point about in the past
articles, but there's plenty more to back this
up. A very prominent Canadian judge spoke up
and basically said,
without an independent judiciary,
Israel's cherished democracy will be at risk.
And the point is, 2018, that the thing
she was worried about later went on to
happen.
Which means they don't have an independent judiciary.
Which that means,
that's why the ICC and ICJ have
the ability to do what they're doing. Remember,
Lindsey Graham wants you to believe that they
can't do this because Israel has an independent
well, no, they don't.
It's obvious, subjective, their own newspapers call it
out.
But that's the point is people like Lindsey
Graham are not in this for you or
for human rights or for the law. They're
in it to blindly fight for Israel at
your expense.
But America first though, guys. America first.
I think that was it. Did I have
hold on. Make sure I didn't mix this
up.
Okay. I think that's just all the same
article. Did I already go through it all?
Yeah. Okay. Good.
So that's the first one.
So here, Prem Thacker pointing to one of
the things that says in that article. Says,
Americans, this is what 1,000,000,000 of your tax
dollars are going to unconditionally. Because realize, what
we just highlighted was before October 7th. Can
you only imagine what we're seeing now?
I mean, what other than what we have
seen, what we can prove. But I mean,
the stuff that we don't see.
This person says, I feel like you left
out the most gut wrenching example. Like, what
in the world justifies doing this to a
kid? And this is the point about the
commander breaking that kid's arm well before October
7th
and punching him in the stock. I mean,
that's just that guy's a monster that deserves
to be put in prison.
Don't forget, as I said before,
the endless amount of doctors that are right
now telling you they're killing children. They're aiming
at children. They're ethnically cleansing. They're exclusively killing
it's what their doctors across doctors across the
world are standing up to try to tell
you what they're seeing. And I simply said
that, how many doctors returning from Gaza telling
you that Israel is deliberately targeting children do
you need to see before something shifts?
Apparently, more.
Try to, Trita Parsi points out that Biden
and most western leaders say that Israel does
not deliberately kill Palestinian children.
Israeli soldiers in this what we just read
from you, read to you, openly speak out
about how they deliberately kill 4 year olds
in Gaza.
He said, this is not very complicated.
Right? There's the article right there. It's really
not. It's pretty damn simple. And here's the
simple part of it.
Quote, one child gets killed every single hour
in Gaza right now.
Since the beginning of the war,
14,500
children have been reported killed in Gaza. That's
that's we we know for a fact it's
more than that. By every study that's been
done, buried, lost, stolen, kidnapped, trafficked. Well, all
that's going on because it usually does in
these war zones when especially when you involve
this real United States.
And that comes out to one child every
hour.
Every hour.
We've been live so far today
for 2 hours. So 2 children have died
while we've been reporting this. Likely more since
it's Christmas, and that's what Israel does. But
I just want you guys to understand how
real that is. One child every hour. And
so what we're talking about is evidence coming
out every which way. I'm just gonna play
the opening part of this just so you
can hear him say it. A Jewish doctor
amongst many other doctors in the world telling
you what Israel is doing on the ground
right now. When were you in Gaza? End
of April for the 1st couple weeks, and
then there's sniper bullets. I had children that
were shot twice. What you're saying that children
in Gaza are being shot by snipers? Definitively.
I have 2 children that I have photographs
of that were shot so perfectly in their
chest I couldn't put my stethoscope over their
heart more accurately
and directly on the side of the head
in the same child. No toddler gets shot
twice by mistake by the world's best sniper,
and they're dead center shots.
In fact, more than 20 doctors recently in
Gaza also told Sunday morning about gunshot wounds
to children.
One American doctor told us he even reviewed
CT scans to confirm what he saw because
he, quote, didn't believe that this many children
could be admitted to a single hospital
with gunshot wounds to the head.
Some shootings
have been captured on video.
So of all the disaster zones you've seen,
how does Gaza compare?
All of the dis disasters I've seen combined
combined. 40 mission trips 30 years,
ground 0,
earthquakes.
All of that combined
doesn't equal
the level of carnage
that I saw against civilians
in just my 1st week in Gaza.
And when you say civilians,
is it mostly children?
Almost exclusively children.
I've never seen that before.
Never seen that. I've seen more
incinerated children than I've ever seen in my
entire life combined. I've seen more shredded children
in just the 1st week. Shredded? Shredded. What
do you mean? Missing body parts, being crushed
by buildings, the greatest majority,
or bomb explosions,
the next greatest majority. We've taken shrapnel as
big as my thumb
out of 8 year olds.
The UN reports that today
By the way, just being, somebody's pointing out
the chat, that that was being cited by
UNRA and and the the, per hour but
we've already gone over the numbers in the
past that show that it's it's much higher
than that in my opinion. Like, I think
the numbers are higher than that but that's
what they're breaking down statistically based on the
number they can prove. But either way, as
somebody points out the chat, I I can
guarantee you it's more than that.
But 1 an hour is far too much
too much.
Now, that clip is important,
right? Because it really does show you
how clear this is. And real and going
back to oh, I already closed it. But
the thread showing you all these doctors breaking
down,
stoic lifetime doctors who have gone to many
different war zones, literally breaking down crying because
of what they've seen. I just can't re
I just
I'm overwhelmed with how many people seem to
want not to look at this.
But Andre x points out in regard to
the
report from 972 magazine
entitled Gaza reveals horrors of the offer camp,
and yet another one. And it says, my
hands are paralyzed from torture. Guys reveal horrors
of one of these camps that they're in.
This is Andre x who says he's recently
found out from his own experience at one
of these places. Even regular Israeli prisons are
essentially just systems of constant
psychological and physical torture of every inmate.
That's what you're dealing
with. This person saying his older brother is
imprisoned at one of these camps, so he
knows full well what they're dealing with.
Franchesca Albanese
points out that Israel has tortured Palestinians for
decades as widely documented by amnesty, by UNICEF,
by plenty of work internationally renowned or acknowledged
human rights groups
and so on.
That's the same report on the camp, by
the way.
The other article here, the it says, the
more evidence emerges from Gaza, this is posted
yesterday from Herets, the clearer the nauseating picture
of our loss of humanity becomes.
Unreal
how the west is such a coward right
now in regard to the media and the
governments. How clearly we can see what's happening.
Here's the article.
The investigative report Harratz published last week paints
a shocking picture of unbridled lawlessness,
and we already talked about this, the Netzerom
corridor.
The kill zone.
Says the reported detailed the report detailed numerous
incidents that can't be termed anything other than
war crimes, and some indicate a loss of
the soldiers' humanity.
According to your report, the troops drew an
imaginary line in the area that doesn't appear
on any map,
meaning they Palestinians don't know this and isn't
written on any official order, which means they
didn't tell them about it. They call it
the line of dead bodies.
The commander of the and so they're they're
happily pointing this out because they think they
have impunity.
The commander of the 2 sec 200 and
52nd division explained the source of the name.
He says, quote, after shootings,
bodies are not collected,
attracting packs of dogs who come to eat
them. In Gaza, people know that what what
wherever you see the dogs, that's where you
shouldn't go.
Yeah. Totally not the Nazi dynamic. Right? These
people are just normal guys murdering children, making
a body line, and joking about it, and
then happily telling whoever comes along. There's something
in inherently sick in these
people. And I'm not talking about any broad
stroke. I'm talking about this person saying it
and anyone else saying something like this. It's
not all Jews or all Israelis or all
anything.
Very clearly though, these people have a problem.
And it says, for instance, dozens of bullets
fired at someone who turned out to be
just a boy, maybe 16, they're saying.
Some of the soldiers, quote, were shooting and
laughing.
Later, the battalion commander praised the killing and
said he hoped we'd kill 10 more tomorrow.
Oh, so it's obvious how that didn't change
from 1997
to right now. So let's make sure we
fill in the gap
that they've been doing this ever since for
70 say for 77 years, guys.
1 after 1 Gaza resident managed managed to
survive massive gunfire targeting his group,
3 of his friends were killed. The soldiers,
quote, put him in a cage,
set up near our position, stripped off his
clothes. Soldiers passing by spit at him.
This is what we're always being told happening
everywhere
else. The cages, the the hostages,
the the in the dehumanization.
These are the terrorists, guys.
Gazans who were shot and killed after crossing
this imaginary line
were then labeled terrorists
by the IDF even though there was no
evidence of this that they admit themselves.
It was an arbitrary decision that cast serious
doubt on the army's reports about how many
terrorists they've killed.
Peretz writes, one officer of the division described
an incident in which out of 200 bodies
whose identities were later checked,
only 10 were confirmed as known Hamas operatives.
Which even then, that's a pretty flimsy claim
with how much we know that has broadened
out after the election to be anything that
works in any in like, people that needed
to work with them to be able to
access government positions because of the what Israel
did.
The bottom line is, even on what they
admit,
only 10 out of 200.
Because the more evidence emerges from Gaza, the
clearer the nauseating picture of our loss of
humanity becomes.
They are murdering innocent people and just calling
them terrorists, and it's all on the record,
and your government doesn't care.
And then they steal things from those homes
and sell them online.
You if you wanna actually highlight a trail,
a literal digital trail to genocide, it's right
now what they're doing all over the Internet
and nobody cares. At least nobody does the
official capacity to hold them accountable for it.
BM from Israel points out some more some
more normalized looting by Israelis. A guitar from
Gaza that plays great.
An item for sale in Facebook marketplace, which
means Facebook allows that, Offered by an Israeli
by the name of Yaniv Isdan, using his
own name,
for for a $123,
labeled a from Khan Yunus,
a great instrument.
Fantastic.
But here's the other one, Levy coming in
with the facts for you. Okay?
Piers Morgan says the UN has only recognized
3 genocides in history and may I I
I called him out beneath this and said,
you just destroyed your own argument. Basically, lists
off different genocides and his argument in here
is, if Israel had killed over a 1000000
people, well, then maybe I could think genocide.
He's a complete moron. It clearly doesn't even
either he understands the metric metrics of genocide
on how you prove that or doesn't. Either
way, he's an idiot. And he says, there's
only been 3 that have been legally termed
that, which was Cambodia, which Israel has overlapped
with in the conversation of the many different
examples of the past. Rwanda, that's what I
point out down here. Israel's involvement in Rwanda,
1,000,000 killed. Then he goes on to say,
the Sri Bredica massacre,
8,000 killed in 2 weeks.
Well, as I think it was,
what was his name? Somebody on his interview
pointed this out before. There's historical examples of
Israel in in killing more people in a
short period of time.
Or rather comparatively. Like, you know,
exactly the same dynamic, but he refused to
say it then. My point was, if you're
talking about 8,000 in 2 weeks, but you're
you're telling me that a 100,000 or 200,000
plus in a year doesn't work for you?
But that doesn't even matter. It's not about
the number.
As every international body has made clear, as
UN members have made clear, which he clearly
sees and doesn't care. He's a dishonest person.
In kinda the most grotesque way, trying to
pretend like he's honorable. But I simply said,
you destroyed your own argument.
Few are more are for you are as
monstrous as those who not only obfuscate genocide,
but then act like the virtuous one while
doing so. And by the way, it is
clearly documented that Israel was involved in the
Rwanda genocide and many others. And again, that's
not my opinion or on blog. This is
a documented reality on Wikipedia, for crying out
loud, how Israel was involved before, during, and
after that genocide. Arm the people that committed
it, like most of them, if you look
back through history.
Asarad points out, imagine the reaction of Western
Christians if this headline was about any other
country.
Israel strikes in Gaza kill at least 22
as the Vatican envoy visits Christians for pre
Christmas mass.
Can you imagine that nobody made a big
deal about this from the Christian right? Isn't
that wild? At least not that I saw.
The point is that this was while the
pope was there.
Pope Francis, it says, machine gunning children and
bombing schools and hospitals is cruelty, not war.
Yeah. We all should know that. The funny
part was the Washington Post basically made this
article as kind of like
as she writes, we're so disappointed in the
with the pope, or rather what Israel's making.
They're saying they're disappointed with him. But even
the article
seemed to be slanted in a very weird
way. And it's just he also expressed his
his pain thinking of the cruelty to children.
So even the Pope, by the way, what
what they bomb while he's there. Like, it's
just so clear what they're trying to say
to the world.
Now, lastly, as I already want it pretty
much covered, don't forget that Donald Trump, according
to 12 channel 12 news, has now come
out and said that he will ins not
insist on humanitarian aid. Meaning, we'll continue the
starvation tactics of the Biden administration.
This is,
oh, right. They're just simply highlighting this article
that's hot I've I've pointed out here, where
they're saying that Trump demands that he they
better get release all the hostages by the
time I come into office or hell will
break loose, well, that means that you're gonna
continue the war just like with the Ukraine.
We know this is the reality based on
everything that's happening.
Now, of course, he could change his mind.
He could shift away from it. Like, this
point being that he's probably gonna deploy resources
inside of Gaza, which means military, according to
the Atlantic Council.
I mean, how do we not see this
coming?
And then down here, it reiterates
the squeeze of some of the humanitarian aid.
Very clear where this goes. That is not
what he promised.
But remember, according to let's go back real
quick.
Let's keep it up. Oh, it did. It
updated.
To the United Nations,
this is where the this is where the
aid is at this point.
I mean, just realize that with with 500
a month before this and already being food
insecure was already there was problems already developing
because of that, and they were already writing
about this. Anything under that is guaranteed to
kill people.
That's all you need to understand in this.
And they're and they're doing 37 in October.
37 a day. When 500 was already getting
was already suffer people were suffering. And that's
all this only exists because Israel never let
them go back to the location they occupied,
which was the right of return. Which is
why honor was created. That's it.
Now they act like, why do they all
need
our,
humanitarian aid? Why are they all using the
system? It's like, you guys, it's such easy
track back to see. Israel already agreed to
give back the land in regard to the
occupation in 67 borders conversation and, ultimately,
has never done so. Like, you know, whatever
their narrative is, Hamas and all this, but
they're the ones funding them. But it doesn't
change the reality of it.
The reason they steep still have humanitarian aid
is because they are still refugees because Israel
has not can fill fulfilled as part of
the bargain.
And I don't care how long it takes.
The point is they have a legal right
to their territory.
Why they should have to go find some
other life when the point is they want
their home? Many of them still keys to
the houses where some New York person lives
in.
Maryav from 972 magazine points out or, again,
maybe she's moved to crisis group, says while
Gaza is starved and freeze, Israel has set
up a hotel like facility in the middle
of Northern Gaza.
That includes massages,
pedicures,
barber on-site dentist,
PlayStation,
Belgian waffles.
It it it has also begun operating a
destiny a a desalination
site for clean running water from the sea.
Despite all the dumb narratives you get from
Zionist liars about how they all it was
always that Hamas who Hamas who ruined all
this, which is just patently false, on top
of the fact that Hamas is funded by
Israel. The point is that you're in an
area where you're starving people to death.
Northern Gaza, 12 trucks in 2 and a
half months.
And what you're doing is building a an
area. Like, I argue this is deliberate torture,
where they're out here starving to death, and
you can look into this camp and see
massages and pedicures and barbers and PlayStation and
Belgium. How much you wanna bet that can
smell the food coming out of this area?
That, in my mind, you could say I'm
wrong. It's my opinion, is done in order
to torture these people.
That's what I think.
During Christmas, while they're literally starving in front
of them. Why that needs to happen
is anybody's guess. It's obvious that it's not
about helping anybody but themselves, and they're gonna
continue to occupy this territory.
Lastly,
and I just made this point last time.
He just points out that pro is the
the pro Israel folks, mostly on the right,
insist Israel isn't cutting humanitarian aid to Gaza.
Right? That's all we keep hearing. Then
celebrate rumors that Trump won't pressure them to
let aid in.
I think that speaks for itself.
Lastly, here's the West Bank,
where there are now this this was on
the 23rd.
IDF implements a mass attention campaign in Al
Fawar refugee camp in the West Bank.
Look. They're they're literally rounding up people now
in the West Bank. The world is run
by cowards, guys. If we have not stood
up by now, we're cowards.
Look at what's going on. The West Bank
was a red line for Jordan even, and
yet here where are they?
Nobody's doing anything. They are ethnically cleansing and
murdering people in real time, grounding up innocent
people, women, and children, shooting them for fun,
laughing about it online,
and taking whatever they want. And this just
keeps going.
Bombing Yemen too. Now
Saudi Arabia,
shelling in Yemen, which does speak to more
coordination back to what they were always you
know, the normalization dynamic. We have to wait
and see what happens there. But realize as
even Max Bloom with all pointing out, the
US regime won't tell American citizens that it
has declared war on Yemen. Why? Because its
motives are sorted. And so divorced from any
concept of national security, it could not explain
why it's there. You know? Why it would
be murdering people in the most impoverished nation
on the planet, or at least maybe one
of them.
It's only because they are pushing back against
the power structure, and that can't be allowed.
Right? It's the Milgram experiment. The Milgram experiment.
We can't let you recognize that you can
stand up, so we have to sit you
back down. Who cares about freedom and rights
and and ethnic you know, and and human,
like, and human life? Let's just bomb them
into submission and claim they're racist. Right? That
works. Or used to.
Tiberias says, however you cut it, that we
have
failed to stop another holocaust because a small
bunch of people want to control the world's
resources means our society is fundamentally
evil, which means nothing will ever be safe.
We must change this, or we have nothing.
We are nothing.
Now realize, I disagree to a point.
I don't believe that's the reality. I believe
we're ruled by a very focused manipulation of
a collect like, a it's centralized entity.
I argue that the reason they pretend to
be good is because we are predominantly good.
My point though is I do agree with
him.
That right now, the fact that we're not
standing up enough to do something about this,
or rather more specifically the point about the
government structures,
they are fundamentally evil. I think that has
to be understood.
And unless we change this, yes, we will
have nothing.
As they rush you into a point to
where it will no longer matter. That's what
I think is coming through Trump's administration.
Now I'm gonna end, as Ryan points out,
my new favorite congressman,
Joaquin Castro of Texas, speaks out, holding blinking
of the US government accountable.
Now, before I play this and end with
this clip,
I made this point the I think yesterday.
Like, it's it's This is the kind of
thing that we need to lean into.
It is certainly possible that, Joaquin Was it
Joaquin Castro,
that he sees an opportunity.
Right? That he that I've I've I've never
heard his name before. Oh, he he might
not be some prominent congressman. That maybe he
goes, well,
if I lean into this, it's clear that
the majority of people everywhere want someone to
call this out. I guarantee it's gonna get
attacked by Israel, but maybe I could benefit
from that. Maybe I can gain some position
and some clout by doing the right thing
even if I don't care.
Or you could argue that he,
on top of that stance, does care a
little bit. Right? But in other circumstances, wouldn't
do that to challenge his political standing. But
now that he can maybe benefit from it
and also kind of cares, maybe he'll lean
into it. My point is, ultimately, where we
are, it doesn't matter. It does, but in
the context of what we're trying to accomplish,
lean into supporting that. Because whether he means
it or not, what he's saying is true.
That we should stand against Israel and what
they're doing. Gather momentum around him. Do not
only don't don't continue to believe he's always
honest or he'll to follow him no matter
what. Question everything like we do with anything
else, but lean into it.
Gather momentum. Show other politicians that, look, you
can benefit from showing this truth. Let them
then you know, then that becomes the opportunism
narrative of this. And Israel will fight and
attack like it always does, but eventually, you
can shift that momentum.
And or, you know, or maybe he really
genuinely cares. I I hope that's the case.
I just see so little of that in
this conversation in government that it's hard for
me to accept that. I want it to
be the case and I won't push back
on it if I see it being proven.
But just recognize that what we need to
do is work with people like this whether
or not they care because we can change
the conversation. The evidence is there.
We just need to get the momentum going
to point at it, to get people who
either pretend or actually care to be in
positions of power to do something to change
it. That's the barrier right now. We all
see it, but we're not in a position
to make a change. They are. Someone like
this
might be the answer to that. And so
far as they can get it done, but
question everything going forward. So I'll leave you
with that, guys. I hope you have an
amazing Christmas.
Go out there and spend time with your
family. Right? Really really embrace
the the the under the the feeling around
this holiday. The idea of trying to be
a better person, which is what I'm the
my my entire
premise, the the foundation of what this show
is is around, you know, my own journey.
Coming through, you know, my own history of
growing up and having my own,
you know, run ins with the police and
different things and having, you know, and just
wanting to be a better person than I
was. Run ins with with, you know, I
think I've talked about the past of, my
run ins with different drugs and different things,
you know, whatever we're talking about. For me,
it was
the getting my opioids or my, my, wisdom
teeth taken out and getting high like, ridiculously
strong opioids from a doctor without anybody telling
me that there was a risk there. Not
to a degree I was aware of something,
but my point is there was a time
where that was a rampant thing, the whole
opioid spike. Right? And the point is, like
many other people, you end up doing these
because they're fine and you fall in that.
You know, the point is that you end
up in a position where I'm not the
person I wanna be. And I feel like
you get ultimately trapped by these things. Derek
has an amazing story around how he's changed
his life and so on. The point is
that a lot of people in these positions
are in it because of something like that.
That you
whether you just make bad decisions and fall
into something or you feel like you get
kind of trapped in something, the point is
you make a conscious choice to just say,
I'm not this person.
I'm gonna get
back up. I'm gonna fight my way through
this, and I'm gonna be the person I
want to be. It's every day, small choices.
And sometimes that can be in almost feeling
insurmountable.
You know, one small choice today is not
gonna change my circumstance. But one small choice
today and tomorrow and the next day and
the next day and the next day will
eventually change your circumstance if you care enough
and you
stay the course.
Believe in yourself.
My point is lean into the idea that
we can be better
than the world is telling us we should
be. And lean into this holiday today with
that and your family and find that moment,
but then realize that you could do this
every other day too.
So enjoy your family. Enjoy every part of
this holiday. I love you guys. Thank you
for being here. I just can't express enough
how much my life has changed because of
all of you and because of your support
of what we do, and I know we
are changing things out there. So thank you
for being a part of this.
Merry Christmas. I love you all. As always,
question everything. Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Same time, what we've seen by the Israeli
government led by Benjamin Netanyahu
has been inhumane.
In fact, it's amounted to war crimes.
When an army
targets
civilians
in refugee camps,
in hospitals,
in schools, in churches,
in religious institutions,
and does it repeatedly
over and over again,
those are war crimes. We live in a
different world now. This is no longer the
world of the Vietnam War, certainly not World
War 2, not even the world of
the Gulf War in the early 19 nineties.
The world is much more transparent now. People
can all of us are essentially social demographers
and documentarians
who can record the world around it, and
people can see
the inhumanity.
We have not done enough to stop Benjamin
Netanyahu and what he's doing to the Palestinians.
And my question is whether you believe we
should have done anything different.