Welcome to the daily wrap up. A concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Sunday,
December 15th. Thank you for joining me today.
I think today is going to be
a an important follow-up and specific around the
topic of drones
and and the conversation of Syria, Gaza, and
Israel. But, ultimately, in the follow-up conversation, it
is really important to I mean, I'm not
gonna tell you to go back and watch
my show right now for so many hours
before we get into today. But what I
discussed yesterday, there's gonna be a lot of
important kind of precursors to the conversation today.
But the one thing that I'm gonna highlight
that we're gonna get into right at the
gate
is is, again, based off what I was
saying yesterday in the conversation around very real
conversations being very regularly used to manipulate people,
to point to something, for example, that might
very well be taking place that is very
clearly a psychological operation
or something that might not be there at
all that's meant to distract you in other
ways. And so one thing I want us
to think about is, you know, whether whatever
this is the drone conversation, it's so very
obvious that this is supposed to be focused
on. And I think that's always something we
have to highlight, which then doesn't mean that
we should think the opposite is true or
I mean, the reality always needs to be
that we shouldn't assume anything. We We should
always be taking it one step at a
time and waiting till we can prove something
and even then questioning whether we're missing something.
My point though is that when we see
this kind of pulling out all the stops,
congressman calling for action, every you know, this
being discussed on every single channel left or
right, All of the usual suspects out there
harping all sorts of points that, you know,
there are very hyperbolic and emergency broadcasters, all
this kind of stuff happening.
And as far you look around and you
go, what do we actually know right now?
What can we prove?
I mean, even the articles I'm gonna show
you from mainstream platforms,
it's 99%,
if not entirely
subjective
anecdotal information,
which still is important. It still has a
relevance. I still am interested in what people
have to say and personal firsthand experience.
But what other circumstance do you find these
kind of propaganda platforms
laying out a bunch of narrative for you
with nothing especially with what's going on in
the world, pretty much exclusively
exclusively
when it is
some kind of an agenda,
Lying wholeheartedly about what's going on in Israel.
You know what I mean? It's very clear.
So as we see this story going just
haywire right now, I think it's important to
ask
whether everything,
even the corporate media is saying is true,
what is the objective around this? Because I
think it's very obvious that and I'll go
into this more. I'm just kind of the
the precursor here that our our government, as
everybody,
including most of the mainstream alternative media, it
seems, are able to point out that, well,
just using a little bit of logic, it's
pretty clear that they would not allow this
to be continuing the way that it is.
Now, that's where you get this shoehorned in,
Well, it's Biden doing this against Trump, which
is certainly possible, other than my opinion being
that your government is your government. And very
obviously,
in most ways, which I'll make a point
early today,
still working in unison. Trump and Biden working
together in regard to deals with Ukraine, which
completes seems to kinda throw a stick in
the spokes to the argument that this is
some kind of a back and forth, left
versus right, you know, democrats destroying the republicans,
republicans terrifying the democrat. You know, it's this
weird,
obsessive
folk,
you know, don't want people don't wanna give
up on that,
that they've invested what they believe in on
this idea that this is how the world
works. And I think every day, we see
more examples that it's
pretty clearly not the case outside of people
who buy into that and act accordingly believing
that's the case. So we're gonna start with
the drone conversation today and going through what
I think is an important connection. And I
wanna stress that it's simply just a connection
point, another data point. And I I mean,
I'll say it out of the gate that
I think it's
easy to begin to see
I'll say it like this. Is it possible
that I'm I'm choosing to find a connection
to Israel? I mean, obviously, there is a
connection that I'll show you. But is it
me trying to find something in this story
that connects it's certainly possible. I mean, even
I could just flat out say yes because
I think it's important to connect what Israel
is doing because I think it's a very
central conversation in what's going on in the
world. At the same time, I'm I is
it possible that I am just making that
because I want you know? It's always possible.
And I do consider these things, that it's
more me
I guess the reason I'm saying this is
because I get a lot of people call
saying, like, same with during COVID nineteen, that
this
is an overfocus.
That instead of just addressing the story, it's
about trying to make draw lines back to
all the same things. But that's not ultimately
what I'm doing in any case. I look
at these stories and I look for the
information that's relevant. And I just happen to
come across information that seems to connect this,
an Israeli arguing that this is connected to
something that's from Israel. And I said, oh,
that's fascinating.
Obviously,
there's a very important reason we should make
sure we've sussed that out. My point is
on the other side of that, a lot
of people would go, oh, okay. Well, that's
I'm not gonna you know, that can't be
true. I'm not gonna look at that. We
know that's how a lot of partisan stuff
works. And the more I tugged on these
strings, the more I found, okay. This is
interesting. And I found you would find it
important. Now it's just another data point in
the conversation about
many different moving parts to what this is,
where it could be the United States and
Israel, different groups together. It could be Iran
doing this against the United States, and they
don't want you to see that. But we'll
go through why some of these really clearly
don't make sense.
Question everything. Be very careful. We want to
fall into these kind of partisan laid narratives
where it seems to be basically zero information
other than somebody behind them saying what they
tell you their sources claim that we can't
verify, and just wait till we can prove
these things. I think it's very important. We're
also gonna talk about
the first part of it, really, kinda following
up on the information that we kinda cut
off on yesterday's show in regard to Israel
in particular with some new points that I
added that I think are very important. And
then, of course, the main part of Syria
coverage that we added again more things to.
And I think the most pressing which I
put in the title
is the and, you know, it's almost like
it's hard for me to make these to
me, these things are so transparent and that
we've already covered. But yet it for a
lot of people, it is still a bombshell
point to hide that
they're annexing more of Syria
or that they're
they're provably their people are on the ground
executing religious minorities
on video.
And and it's it's my the point is
that, like, today or tomorrow and the next
day, these things should always be headline news,
and it just gets it just kinda blend
into the background. My point is to follow-up
on this again even though we've been covering
this the last week. That is the reality
that US and Israel are backing ISIS patch
wearing extremists and a lot of other elements,
Al Qaeda connected terrorists that they've been telling
you are bad guys,
to take over Syria.
Israel rushed in immediately and started taking more
territory, occupying more elements beyond the Golan Heights,
which is the important part, which was already
illegally occupied. And then it's turning around and
saying, we don't want any issue with Syria.
We don't want any conflict as they're currently
bombing in Syria. And as the United States
currently occupies a third of Syria, one of
the most important elements while acting like we're
hoping this can revitalize Syria. I mean, it's
just
it's so transparently dishonest. And I still am
of the mind that most people actually see
it. That's where we get to the point
about what we can do to cause action
here, but that's a different conversation. So we're
gonna follow-up to give you more of the
up to date on what's going on there.
And a few other parts, I think, fit
into there. So we're gonna leave it there
to start, but I wanna
jump right into the drone conversation. Now, this
really did stand out to me today.
And, you know, again, as much as I
put, like, the disclaimer out there to begin
with, it's really because I worry that people
will dismiss things
because of the opposite reaction. Even if I
am, let's say, overreaching
to try to find this connection. In the
same way, a lot of people, which I
really don't think I am, a lot of
other people in this opposite side of that
would ultimately refuse to look at it for
the same reason.
So always consider that these things might be
playing a factor on how we read these
conversations. So right now with the way this
is going, up until this point, there's been
nothing but hyperbole.
I mean, other than the obvious videos, which
even then, I'm just I mean, I gotta
be honest. I'm which I always am. Most
of these points that we get into
I mean, e like, I'll show you a
post from Alex Jones from today and a
post from, I think, with Zero Hedge that
referenced an, a former congressman. You know? And
and these are immediately being shown even on
Twitter. Nope. That's not what that is. Nope.
Those are just star constellations by the tree.
Nope. That's an old video from 4 years
ago, and it just keeps happening.
And I keep I mean and my point
is there's very clear, provable videos of anomalous
drones.
But is if that's all we're really talking
about, is the is the only story that
influencers and politicians and governments are telling us
to think a certain story?
Yeah. That that that's not to say that
it might not be exactly what they're saying,
but that's kinda where we are right now.
Where everyone seems to be confused and the
the government, which by the way includes all
of your government, not just the part that's
currently pretending to be in power, but the
government
isn't doing anything about it. And they're acting
like, well, we know it's not dangerous and
we know it's not foreign, but nothing else
beyond that.
I mean, it's just so transparent. Now, let's
put it this way first. Is it possible
this is just the Biden administration
conducting some kind of specific agenda? Even even
well, first, yes.
And which doesn't include Trump? Yes. And then
even more so in the context of trying
to do it to go after Trump for
some reason? I mean, obviously, that's possible.
But if we want to consider that point,
if we wanna consider
that this is some kind of divide concept,
we have to ask ourselves what is the
real point? What's the benefit? Right? If the
democrats are on the way out, Trump's administration's
coming in, the argument is it's about trying
to derail Trump's administration. At least that's coming
from some of the mainstream alternative media elements.
But why does that make sense?
I mean, obviously, there's a 1,000 other ways
that you can conduct this. Well, the you
take a step back and you start looking
at the moving parts, and you go, Okay.
Who really benefits from what this is right
now? Well, there's very clear points to make.
Now, who benefits is not the only thing
you should ask. But kei bono, the who
benefits from a situation, is always one of
the most important.
So the obvious point is, okay, from just
a government perspective,
well, the technocratic infrastructure part of it.
Not even getting to the Elon part or
in that yet, just a general point about
whatever side we're talking about,
the rationalization,
or, rather, the problem reaction solution type of
scenario to get you to call for the
thing that might need to be applied to
what this is. Whether that's about restrictions, we'll
point out again around some legislation, which some
of them would call Orwellian drone legislation that
stops you from being able to take certain
action or ubiquitously begins to allow the US
government to use them for their own defense,
but really just allows a ubiquitous surveillance network
using these or military, sort of, enforcement in
domestic context.
Obviously, these things are growing. Obviously, that's what
your government wants. That's not an opinion.
So this, very clearly, even if real, even
if Iran
is going to cause that. It's sorta like
the other things we talk about with gun
legislation.
There's very real things that happen, but then
they roll that into gun restrictions, and that's
the kind of point I'm making even if
real.
Then beyond that, who else benefits from something
like this? Well, it's very clear that there's
an r a vein of this that's really
trying to force in Iran. It's Iran. Iran's
doing it, and that's coming through very specific
Zionist supporting congressmen.
It's coming very clearly from foreign elements that
are saying it's Iran. We know that. But
then you got this weird kind of deviation
from mainstream alternative media who, up until now,
seemed to be blindly on whatever Israel and
the Republican side of this thing says, but
then kinda pull away from the idea of
Iran in this and make it about just
Biden going after Trump, which you can decide
how that plays out. Maybe they just saw
the truth or rather that that's not the
case. I mean, however you wanna look at
it. I tend to think it's about trying
to avoid
seeing seen as obviously blindly in one direction.
But Israel clearly benefits from the manufacturing
of consent
to go after Iran as Vance and Trump
have been saying very clearly that that is
something that's on the table. And when we
the end of today, once we get to
the Syria part, jumping ahead, just recognize what
I said yesterday. Netanyahu is already positioning himself
against Iran. He's already saying from like, while
he's standing in the ruins of Syria and
killing minorities, he's going, is Iranian people, you
need to be free from you know, it's
it's happening real time right now. Already saying
that he has better positioning to bomb Iran,
and it's very real. And so this is
pretty hard to miss. Then you've got the
overlap points of Elon Musk and different peoples
kind of floating these ideas of drone battles
coming soon, which is kind of an obvious
point whether or not this happened. We all
felt that. It's like saying deep fakes are
gonna be a thing. We all know that
seems to be coming. And so it's interesting
to see that. So let let's go through
the mainstream BBC article. I'm really not through,
just one point I wanna make. It says,
what we know about mysterious drones buzzing over
New Jersey. This is from today, really adaptation
from, like, an older article, which I mean,
not to get into that. They do it
every time. This point was this was out
yesterday or the day before, and they just
updated it and didn't tell anybody. But it
says US authorities have been unable
to provide definitive answers,
saying only that the objects were not believed
to pose a danger. So let me ask
you this, oh, to the public or national
security.
When in the world have you ever seen
your government go, well, we're not sure it's
a risk, but we don't believe it poses
a risk, so we're just gonna let it
fly. We're gonna wait and see how this
works out. It's like, that is not what
they do. These people would kill your grandmother
if they thought for a second that it
would hinder something they're doing 10 years from
now. This is how they operate. And if
you don't think so, you need to take
a dance back through very recent history, but
as far back as you wanna look. For
for them to pretend like they don't know
kind of for sure, but we know it's
not really danger,
That's a really opaque answer which to me
and, again, this is my point. This is
all assumptive from this point forward, is that,
ultimately, it would suggest
that they're involved is the obvious per first,
and which is kind of my thought early
on this, which is kind of the easy
you know,
when you first look at these stories, it's
pretty
historically, it's a good guess to go maybe
they're probably involved, but shouldn't assume that. But
that's an easy indication is that they're trying
to just kinda make it you know, if
it's if they thought it was Iran, they
would be acting belligerently.
That or any foreign entity. We know that
now. But it could be them doing this
because it's some secret project, which many things
are floating at. But the other possible thing
would be somebody that's an ally of theirs.
Now if it was the UK, let's say,
I think we already see how the UK
and the US kind of deal with themselves
when it comes to public storage. They're not
usually
it's pretty different when it comes to Israel
and the United States,
where Israel seems to be able to do
whatever it wants. And, like, let's just say
this was Israel conducting itself like this for
for basically its own operation,
completely
just disregarding any US interest and was doing
this to spy on Americans or to test
their drone technology or to see how the
US government respond. The point is
historically proven, the US would not say anything
about it. In fact, a story which I
haven't even gotten into, and there's so much
to to go to talk about,
Candace Owens did a a great interview about
the US liberty,
which the one point I would make about
that since I bring it up, it's interesting,
why a story that's so very public. These
people she's speaking to, the interviews, I mean,
this is public information. Joe Meters is someone
I've referenced who got arrested on the the
freedom flotilla in Israel.
You know, he was outwardly speaking about how
I mean, my point is very public, but
it's interesting why
it takes some certain people to just point
at it before it suddenly becomes a large
you know, that's interesting to me. And all
it makes you wonder, and I think it
was a great interview, is why
that happens.
You know, who is in control of that
ability or is it just something that we
don't recognize? It's very strange, isn't it? That
that story has been so
aggressively,
thoroughly covered by so many well, very, very
well influenced or,
influential people. Right? And so it's just strange
that on a dime all of a sudden,
she's talking about it, Jake Shields, and all
these people start pulling at it and highlighting
these things. I mean, even highlighting like a
Guardian article You could literally see. Anyway, the
point is that's interesting, the controlled flow of
information. I wonder why that is. Maybe the
narrative is shifting. Maybe it's a positive thing.
But either way, I do think you should
check that out. I think she did a
good interview with him, you know, because he
we pointed him in the past exactly who
she's talking to, discussing
how very clear it is that Israel bombed
a US ship. And then that that was
the point that I'm getting to, is that
the US government literally covered it up.
Despite I mean,
check out the interview. There's a whole thing
to get into there about what actually happened
and the reality of how the US covered
it up and how the Israel Israeli government
was knowingly trying to kill US personnel, and
they circle back and bombed again. And the
point is that the US government has been
covering this ever since. So the point in
this context is, is that something
that any other dynamic would create where they
could do something, hypothetically, if that's happening on
our shoreline and the US government would go,
but we don't know. We're not
sure. I don't think so. I've the only
thing I've ever seen like that is with
that weird relationship with Israel and United States,
more than one. Many different examples over history
where the Israeli government does things at the
expense of the US government, and they just
play it off like it didn't happen, ignore
it, or just embarrass themselves.
So that's what that says to me. And
it goes, he added that he knows of
no foreign involvement linked to drone sightings. So
how can you know of no foreign involvement
for something that you can't even really define
or explain? That begins to show you obviously
that they know more than they're saying, which
is pretty ubiquitously being pointed out, which shouldn't
surprise you. Now, of course, you get people
that wanna make this about the only the
current part of the government that's in the
White House except
it's such a straight I made this point
a few shows ago. This weird limbo is
always so interesting. This time period between the
president-elect
being elected and then when they actually take
office, it's like anything they want to pretend
that they have influence on, even though they
usually don't, is all their benefit. But anything
bad that happens in that time frame is
definitely not my fault. You know? And it's
just so strange. And everyone I'll say same
thing in reverse, so the president going out.
In this point, my it's the the idea
is that ultimately,
you could argue
that this would be about them trying to
use it against him and so on. You
know, it's it's just so muddled. Anyway, they
could not get too deep. And the reality
is that it's not verified. It's very
un un it it hasn't been fleshed out
at all other than things in the air
and people trying to deny what's going on
and a lot of speculation.
Now this was from yesterday from New York
Times, same point, just saying I think it's
this is,
oh, never mind. I thought that was a
different writer. Anyway, the point is New York
Times are the headline is after weeks of
drone sightings, New Jersey remains on edge.
Or that's what they want from you, by
the way. I don't actually know why this
is this this is a great point about
privacy,
that this would make you so uncomfortable.
I mean, it definitely has every reason to
make you uncomfortable. My point is, with everything
else that your government's doing
all over the place, or the fact that
there are drones pretty commonly in a lot
of places in this country, why all of
a sudden, people people are just simply going
drones in the sky. It makes me very
scared and nervous and uncomfortable. I just think
that's manufactured.
Now it says, I think it's an invasion,
this person says.
I feel like our privacy is kind of
invaded.
Okay?
So, you know, she's screaming about how a
foreign government's invading their privacy while she's got
an Amazon Echo in her art room and
and a smart TV listening to her and
her Apple phone dictating what she's saying. Right?
It's a funny thing that we choose to
highlight. That's my point. Is that this is
being presented to you as something you're supposed
to be outraged about. You're supposed to be
scared. And even if we are or should
be,
realize they want that from you. You wouldn't
get this kind of coverage if that's not
ultimately the reality. I think that's very clear.
And she goes on to say the kids
are all asking, what's going on? And why
do we have to close all our blinds?
You know? Don't worry about the camera that's
on the light outside on your street. No.
No. That one's fine. It's the random drone.
We don't know what it's from. That's what
we should be worried about. You know? It's
like there's ubiquitous surveillance and
eavesdropping or whatever you wanna call it in
our lives right now, effing everywhere.
Then I think we need to realize that
we're well past the point where it's not
selective. It is ubiquitous.
And so if there's a physical drone that
becomes the worry for your surveillance, doesn't that
seem interesting?
Why would that be the worry? Yes. That's
another aspect of it, but my god. Your
governments, Israeli governments through our country, are spying
on everything you do
using Twitter and everything else.
So that stood out to me as interesting.
And this and this just says oh, at
the same point. Yeah. So that was all
it really was. Just simply saying that I
I feel like our privacy's invaded, and I
think that ultimately that doesn't seem to be
a loose thought with what we're living through.
Right? And so on top of the fact
that it may be the very same government
doing it. Now
this gets interesting
when we start to hear the mainstream coverage.
Now all basically, everything I'm showing you right
now is from yesterday into today.
Jim Ferguson shared this. This is just from
a another NewsNation report coming. I think he's
speaking to a state senator from New Jersey.
And the way that he talks about this.
Now
I'm not going to say that it's impossible
that the New Jersey
government
would be kind of cut off from un
from like they they wouldn't be sharing information
with this with the federal government
or rather that they wouldn't with them.
But I kinda don't I just personally don't
think that lines up. I think that these
people are in communication far more than they're
letting on, and I think that the local
governments, and this is my opinion,
are are are playing this up.
Because, ultimately, from their perspective, you know how
the government works. And if you're getting answers
from the Pentagon or rather through the White
House from the military elements that we're pointing
to, if you if I can discern that
that clearly seems to suggest that they know
something you're not telling us, so can they.
And a lot of them are saying that,
by the way, saying that, you know, like
even Trump said, if you're not gonna tell
us what this is, then shoot them down.
But I find it interesting. All I'm trying
to show you here is that think about
the way they're presenting this and ask yourself
if this feels
organized. Jim says, New New Jersey senator drops
bombshell on mystery UFO drones. And, by the
way, I also think that's funny because,
technically, that he, it means unidentified flying object.
But we all know how the term UFO
has basically become synonymous with aliens.
And that's that's a lazy point. Right? That
that's because that's how we are in a
lot of ways. You put language in the
world. The things become they kind of muddied.
Right?
Watered down.
But I do think it's interesting how much
this is being used, not and not even
pointing to Jim himself, but anything out there.
That there's a a lot of this in
the conversation that's about aliens, and yet then
even from the government, you get the reference
of, like, UFO. You wouldn't you just say
UFO? Why would you say UFO drone?
That seems redundant. Right? But I but he
I think he's just highlighting what's being stated.
Either way, I think that's
important.
Now it says there are reports that UFO
drones are now being seen all over the
United States as well as reports from UK
military sites and military installations in Germany and
Europe. Funny.
But it's it's interesting. Right? Are we are
we seeing it in you know? Like, just
think about the selective locations that seem to
be reporting this, which all seem to be
on the same side. And it says panic
is setting in as Americans get desperate for
clarification. Now that think about that.
If nobody had pointed to this at all,
if nobody anywhere was saying anything
other than people online going, I'm seeing lights
in the sky, and then other people in
common doing, well, that's a star constellation. Yeah.
It looks like drones. Maybe they're delivering something.
The point is without the hype from the
partisan media and the corporate media,
would we even be this worked up about
it? The same thing we said about the
COVID 19 dynamic before the actual bio up
and shot was released. The reality that that
thing they were telling you was everywhere. Well,
if you weren't watching them fear hype and
and fearmonger about it,
you walk on your front door, there's nothing
I don't see there's nothing wrong. I don't
see anything happening. And now we know that
was the reality. The re what's interesting is
that the panic is setting in as we
get desperate for well, that's what they're seeding
into your mind. That's what the corporate media
and the mainstream of all sorts of media
are flooding into your view in everywhere you
look. Despite that there's an ongoing genocide, and
we'll get into it about children being burned
alive as we speak or the starvation of
children in Gaza or the occupation of Lebanon
and the same thing's happening there, the ongoing
ethic cleansing in Syria,
or let's just take a just get away
from foreign policy. What about the proofable examples
of the different chemical, you know, as Caitlin
Johnstone points, the great poisoning?
We just talked about glyphosate. That's literally everywhere.
We talked about dioxins and PFAS and I
mean, or how about something else? What about
our own constitution? Right? And the point is,
there's so many very provable examples of things
that we can document that are happening. We
can
but here we are focusing on something that
we're being told to be scared about without
very little with very little information. That should
be the
major red flag, all the hallmarks of how
these things tend to work, even if it's
actually a true story. Now it says calls
for a limited state of emergency.
That stands out to me. So now you've
got the government, the jur New Jersey element
saying, we need a state of emergency.
That, of course, should raise a red flag.
A state of emergency
when we don't even know what's happening?
See, there's something bit clearly going on behind
the scenes here. This is John Bramnick
suggesting the federal government is hiding something massive
about the mystery drones, which probably
so explosive that they fear all out public
panic if the truth comes out. See my
point? What does that even mean? So if
you're suggesting, John Bramnick, that you don't know
what's going on, right, that I I just
have a suspicion that they're hiding something big,
but then jump that into
something big that I don't know anything about,
that's so explosive that all out panic if
it comes out, which clearly indicates you know
something. You wouldn't just go this unknown thing
I'm completely unaware of that might cause panic
everywhere.
How would you know that?
What if it's a balloon and nothing else?
Like, the point is that it's interesting. You
can hype this.
I think they all know something. I think
this is
a a very clearly being hyped operation.
Here's what he has to say.
That's the wrong one.
Did I not grab that? I'm almost certain
that I grabbed that. Hold on a second.
Shoot.
Alright. I gotta grab it live. Here we
go. Hold on.
Telling you, I know I grabbed that.
So this guy, I'll just basically already summed
up some of the points I thought were
relevant,
but here is what he was saying to
NewsNation.
There we go.
Thank you for your patience.
And here we go.
You know, this started as some
questions,
and now it's reached the point of almost
insanity.
You think about a United States senator who
has to go out with the local police
to look for drones.
That's where United States senator is getting information.
We had a
So but right there, why they're going out
looking for drones? If we don't even know
what's going on yet as they're being as
they're relaying to us, what are you hunting
for? What do you what do you think
you're looking for? What if it's a drone
delivering something? What if it's the guy's drone
from the corner? Which by the way are
part of this.
It's just interesting. Right? Like, there you wouldn't
go out on some hunt for drones and
and document the whole thing if you can't
even tell us what you think you're looking
for other than drones in the sky, which
clearly could be other things, local things, or
planes, or anything else,
which I'm clearly don't I'm not trying to
pretend that there are not drones. There's plenty
of evidence of that going on.
But doesn't that seem to stand out to
you as building a narrative of some kind
of hunt for you know, it's very strange
to me. Briefing from the state police, the
colonel in the state police. He was frustrated.
He had no idea
where these drones are coming from. Not only
did I call for a limited state of
emergency and the FAA
shutting down the airspace for drones Wow. But
also having the Department of Defense
come in and answer questions.
This is exactly what these things look like
before they're trying to jam in something. Right?
That's I'll get to in a minute somebody's
very excellent point about right now as we
look to the skies, ask yourself what else
we're seeing, what legislation they're trying to sneak
by, which really stood out to me for
two reasons.
But the idea is usually, historically, this is
what we get. You know? You get the
fake anthrax scare, which drives you into the
Patriot Act. Like, that's how these things work,
guys, and we can prove that.
So whether he knows that, whether local police
know that, like, I think it's very clear
or or may not that I'm saying I
know that for a fact, but if hypothetically
speaking, this is what you would get. This
ambiguous
hype of things we can't prove that drives
into some narrative at the end point. Like,
this is
look back through history,
and, usually, you get the
coattail chasing, hyper you know, partisan media that's
just trying to jump after the story, and
every new theory gets I know for sure
this is it. Tomorrow, it's something new. Tomorrow,
it's something new. And people just love. It's
entertaining.
Like, mainstream alternative media, in my opinion, is
far more driven today by just the fact
that they enjoy
the secret story conspiracy there. And most of
these times, it doesn't even matter whether it
flushes out. It's fun. Right? It's the it's
the new
reality TV, and they just lie to themselves
and pretend like they're all out there chasing
new stories. At the end of the day,
I'm not talking about the egregious manipulators
are ultimately in it just to jump to
the you know, whatever new theory gets thrown
out, they jump on top and say, I've
got something backing that up. We'll get to
you. It's it's everywhere.
If the Department of Defense
doesn't know
where the origins
are for these so called drones,
then we're in trouble. We always thought that
if there was something in the air
the size of a car
that the Department of Defense
would know where it came from, what its
origin was, and what its purpose was. Now
right there, that's a good point. Right? So
we already have the reality of how our
radar system and, actually, the reality being that
they're far more advanced than they would let
on to you. But if that's the case,
that means there's one of 2 things. Either
that they knew it was there and they
can see it because they can show you
on radar, which means that they're very aware
of what's going on and they're lying to
you,
or it was some kind of technology that
allows it to not be seen on radar.
And if that's the case, then why would
they be telling you it's not a risk
and that it's not foreign?
It's very clear. No. I'm not saying I
have the answer to that. But the interesting
point would be, if you wanna guess further,
that would suggest either that they know it's
foreign, they're hiding that from you, or that
it's their project and they're hiding that from
you.
Now you have a United States senator going
out with the local police, what, to look
at for fireworks at night? That is scary.
It is terrifying. And Caitlin just reported
Why is that terrifying?
It's it's uncertain. It's confusing. It's a mystery.
But why is that
terrifying? Like, they're
they're trying to hype this story.
If we don't know what it is, it
could literally be nothing. It could be it
could be some company out there testing. This
could be a promotion for a new movie
coming out. My point is it's only terrifying
because they're jamming that in your mind right
now.
Senate elect Trump is calling for government transparency,
which you are as well. He's saying may
Yeah. I'd love that too, Trump. Let's make
sure we run with that during the next
administration. Maybe shoot them down if we don't
get any more information. What is your reaction
to that?
Well, I would leave that up to the
Department of Defense,
but how can the Department of Defense
not provide information to the public? This is
a shock to me. You know, I have
a general belief in government,
but this is taking me to the end
of my belief that government is really being
honest. Now there's been some apparently top,
top secret briefings, right, with congresspeople.
Now they come out of that, and I
heard Josh Godheimer come at the the representative.
And he said, well, I'm not getting a
lot of information,
but I don't think it's a threat. So
my guess is there is information,
but they're holding it back.
So in the chat, it's pointing out that
that it's the fact that they seem to
be so such a large amount of coordination.
Now I don't know if you mean in
the partisan
media or corporate media field with the narrative
or simply that the drones are coordinated. Either
way, I think it's the same point. Trust
me. I get why this is weird
and could be unsettling,
but the frightened fear, terrify,
the these are the words you're seeing in
all the corporate coverage of this in the
mainstream alternative media. I I I mean, maybe
maybe you disagree. I think that's very hyped.
I think at this point, it's a little
bit of an unsettling mystery. We're not sure.
Well, same thing with the with the balloons
and which, by the way, a lot of
the Republican
leader you know, rulership in the congress are
are referencing the supposed Chinese balloons,
the spy balloon. That's not what happened there.
That story very clearly ended up where that
was the opposite of the reality. And just
like chemical weapons and Syria, they just run
with the narrative,
which a lot of the mainstream alternative media
is pointing to as well, and I think
that's important to think about.
And now what you have is panic.
Originally, some questions.
Now you have serious, serious
concerns. And at the next point, somebody's gonna
do something stupid. So the Department of Defense
So there you go. So when they do
something, quote, stupid and they turn around and
go, Trump told them to shoot at it,
you know, that you can see how these
things fall together if that's the way that
goes and would rationalize more restrictions on you,
which I do which I'll get to. I
do think is the one of the likely
possibilities here.
Has to come clean with the American public.
So to your point, the FBI says they
have no evidence of malicious activity or intent
in these drone flights.
What is it that they might not be
telling us and why?
Well, no evidence
that this is a threat. What does that
mean? Right. How does that help an average
citizen and under no evidence of a threat?
You mean they didn't do anything sinister yet?
Well, you know, yet. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
I mean, I'm not siding with anybody here,
but, yeah, that's pretty basic. There's no indication
of a threat, which means there could be
tomorrow. But right now, that's what he just
explained for himself. Right now, there's no indication
that there's anything happening that's threatening.
That seems to be, like, the most important
thing they've said so far. Now they could
be lying, but what I think is funny
is he's just skipping over their statement kind
of alluding to the fact they're lying, which
I would consider as well, but arguing that,
like you know, it's kind of the suggestion
that because they said that there is a
threat or either way that they're high.
It's so I this is my problem when
you get into the partisan speculation.
It's very easy. But I I think it's
important to theorize,
to stand back and consider what could be,
but don't
just blindly lurch into the direction of what
works for your worldview. That's so common today,
and I think we all see it. It's
easy to. We all do it. I'm I've
I've done it myself in the past. But
it's important to question on your own perspectives,
you know, question everything. Stand back and go,
am I missing something? And if you tend
to do that repeatedly,
you'd see it when you do it. You
stand back and go, okay. Wait a minute.
Wait a minute. But either way, panic, panic,
panic. You know what? That's what I get
from this conversation. Probably can make that statement,
and I have no top secret clearance. Based
on what I've seen so far,
looking out my window, it doesn't appear to
be a threat to our country. Right. And
that's fair. But I would agree with the
point he's making there that it seems like
a very dumb thing for them to report
in the context of what they obviously seem
to know. Right? Not just that we can
look out our window and see nothing's happening,
but they have far more information.
Clearly,
how do they know it's not foreign? Right?
I mean, they I so that's the point
I would hype high highlight, focus on.
But then from there, there's no real indication
that you should jump to panic.
Okay. Why? Well, because I looked out the
window. That's all I'm getting from the federal
government, and every every single person, Democrat or
Republican, has been calling for the same thing.
That's why I have some That should stand
out to you. It usually does. When you
see complete unison in the partisan field,
very rarely does that happen. Typically, foreign policy
wars in Israel, and we're usually at war
because of Israel. So I think it's important
to consider the unison all of a sudden.
Concern that there is something very secret going
on because
how how did they
people with the technology
have no idea except it's not if they're
saying it's not a threat, it must be
something going on that's real, real top secret.
Senator, have you had this kind of discretion
from the government before when you've asked them
questions straight out?
I've never seen anything go on this long.
And why would the government Let's also not
forget that we have many examples going back
years, in fact, for last year and before
that were drones around this base or drones
doing this or even the Chinese balloon point.
Like, this has been something that's been being
floated out more than once and every time
it's the same idea. Oh, we don't know.
We're not sure. Like, it just it just
is not if we've seen them act belligerent,
irrational
for something that turns out not even to
be a threat, which they've done many times,
and then now we see them kind of
just broadly over the process of years not
doing anything about this, they're it's not it's
not adding up. They know something as everyone
seems to highlight that they're not telling us.
Allow the public to be so frustrated. Right.
Why would the why would the government allow
a United States senator be so frustrated?
We heard this from both sides of the
aisle. Now that brings to me to the
point that whatever these drones are doing, the
government really doesn't want us to know.
It that what that must mean is they're
Or or, right, there's there's something they don't
know, and they're embarrassed by that, which is
a very one of the many possibilities.
But you have
left and right meet, partisan media, congressman,
basically in line with this.
That seems very telling to me. And I
think what's important is that you see that,
and as you pointed out, that it's causing
people to get outs upset. Average people are
upset and unconcerned.
So there's a perfect environment
to roll in with the solution
Every time. More concerned with us getting knowledge
and being afraid of that information
than having no knowledge and be and having
all these questions.
That's why I'm worried about it. It must
be something going on that they can't tell
us because they are so fearful of what
the public's gonna do when they hear what
the drones are doing. There's no way the
Department of Defense does not know what's going
on. We have not heard. Have we heard
one word from the Department of Defense? I
agree with that. And I also agree other
other than the possibility that this is something
that, let's say, Israel is doing, right, that
they don't wanna admit to you, which I
guess even then would still mean that they
would know something they're not telling you.
0.
Unbelievable. And you are calling for a limited
state of emergency and a ban on flying
drones like you and I just talked about
it. And there you go. A ban on
flying drones, which applies to you. So now
they're restricting your ability to be able to
use incoming technology, which will begin to this
will expand way beyond drones
just like the biotechnology
field and, you know, your or your, you
know, digital twin or your biometric data. My
point is always,
we still barely grasp what those things will
mean
in the very near future as we
blindly rush into this technocratic reality. Right? So
my point is that if they suddenly go,
well, just for your safety, because of something
we manufactured or whatever that we're using, that
we're gonna restrict your rights in that context.
And and that well, by the way, then
creates a circumstance where you have only government
drones,
so there's no ability for you to fight
back or to stop them or, you know,
whatever else. And we have a situation where
then you have another element of ubiquitous surveillance.
I think that's very important, which by the
way is one of the legislative pieces right
now that are quietly coming through
and are gonna be rationalized by this exact
moment. A moment ago, the FAA has already
imposed no fly zones. The drones are still
in the air. Nothing is being done.
How would what you're calling for change the
situation? Obviously, whoever is putting these drones in
the air isn't really caring about these warnings.
Well, I'm not sure about that because who's
ever putting the drones in the air is
not they're not violating the law technically.
So if we put that in effect,
we would see whether or not
these individuals who are setting them up are
bold enough to violate the law.
K. See my point? So right now, yeah,
you could fly it if you want to.
But if we pass this law, well, then
we'll see whether they're going to. And if
you mark my words,
when that passes, it'll never get removed.
Right now, why should they stop assuming
they're a private entity?
I never would believe that this is a
private entity. But if so, why do we
need let me ask you a question. Is
there some reason we need drones that badly
right now in the air when people are
panicking?
Shut them down.
FAA should shut them down. Who are they
helping? All they're doing is creating panic.
I agree with you. To that point, what
do you wanna tell your constituents, senator?
Continue to put pressure
on and it's not even state officials. I
I saw Larry Hogan said something the other
day. This is the federal government that's not
coming clean, and I'm not one of these
conspiracy people. But if this continues, you're gonna
see conspiracy theories
that in my judgment
are creep panic.
Too late.
Literally what you're involved in right now. Like,
it's just how funny this is. They love
the point that the term conspiracy theory and
just make it, you know, whatever they deem
to be bad or
the wrong thought or the truth they wanna
hide. But he literally just laid out a
bunch of theories about the government conspiring to
hide that from you. Do you remember how
dumb he just made
himself look? Or rather,
maybe by design because they don't want you
to realize that all that is is just
considering how you're being lied to by a
powerful entity. Right? That's all that means. We're
if you can't recognize that people conspire,
especially powerful people, to benefit at your expense,
just be seeing as how there's literally a
charge. People get charged for conspiracy in this
country all the time. Not conspiracy theory, but
convincing conspiracy in a in a in a
business or an it's all it's common.
So the point is when you're pointing at
somebody who is when you're theorizing, considering
how somebody, whether an entity, whether a business,
whether it's a government, might be,
you know, working together to lie to you
like this. You know what that's called?
A conspiracy theory. It's not a derogatory term.
It is that some it is that theorizing
about somebody conspiring against you.
Such as funny to me, but you guys
all know this. I mean, honestly, I think
literally everybody knows this. They just choose to
use those things against the people they don't
like.
So come clean now.
Everyone on both sides of the aisle is
asking for this, and I'll tell you something.
The citizens deserve better.
So the point,
right, is that we're now in a position
where
everyone's on the same page asking for what
you know, begging for our own subjugation. This
all this tends to go.
But right now,
if you can't recognize that what the government
he's pointing to is Donald Trump, is Biden,
is Kamala,
is Vance,
they're the government.
And right this moment, they're working together on
something in regard to Ukraine, but we're gonna
pretend that over here, they're secretly working, which
you know, anything's possible.
But if we can't stand back and continue
to see how many of these narratives are
simply floated on the back of somebody claiming
they know and somebody behind me claiming they
know without anything to back it up, which
doesn't mean it's fake, but how long this
continues when we have evidence that does back
up the things that aren't as fun, aren't
as flashy, aren't as mainstream alternative media.
Now here is
the first one we referenced yesterday.
This is from 0 Edge. New Jersey drone
invasion just in time for congress to reauthorize
Orwellian law.
And then so this is important because
what we're gonna show you next is another
article from today, from 0 hedge which simply
says new theory.
Drone sightings, nuclear sniffers, which which brings us
to the main point of this. The reason
I'm showing you that is, you know, which
which zero good what I appreciate is that
0 hedge didn't just update this article, which
is what most platforms do even it just
kills me. Mainstream clearly more than anything where
they just update it, alter everything, change the
title. And it's just you know, one of
the reasons I hate that so much is
you share something like that on a platform,
and the metadata changes too when they do
that. So all of a sudden, the title
changed on what you shared and suddenly your
post doesn't make sense, which, you know, is
is frustrating. Anyway, the point is
14th,
they're they're con discussing the concern about whether
this might be done by something, which clearly
the indication is your government, in order to
manipulate you to rationalize another Orwellian law that
restricts your rights. Now what they point out,
which I think is very relevant to the
next point, is again that Elon Musk has
been really hyping this. 2023,
drone wars are already a big deal. We
ain't seen nothing yet in the end of
September of this year and more than this,
by the way, but epic drone war is
coming.
That was the 29th. Then the next day,
drone swarm battles are coming that will boggle
the mind. Oh, and I didn't even say
it because we're gonna come to it next.
The opening video was a Palantir video.
Palantir released that at the game they just
went to. And guess what it was about?
Drone swarms.
What a coincidence, guys. It must just all
be a coincidence. And even they ask, what
did Elon know ahead of time?
Down here,
it makes the point. Now, we're gonna come
back to this tweet which seems to be
this tweet came out,
well, technically, this guy posted it on the
13th December.
This account they say is deleted but he's
already come back,
which lays out the narrative that suddenly is
being, you know, highlighted as this new breaking
story even though it's, you know and I'll
get into why it seems very suspicious
other than the obvious direction it's pointing to.
But it says purported drone sightings could be
a psyop against you to manipulate congress into
passing the new HR 8610
counter UAS authority, security,
safety, and reauthorization act of 2024.
And it says this bill would renew
and reform
counter UAS legal authorities and strengthen the FFA's
oversight
oversight powers of drones.
It says with current drone countering authority set
to expire on December 20th, the sudden surge
in purported drone sightings and the accompanying mainstream
media and social media panic might make a
bit more sense
in an effort to push the reauthorization
of Orwellian drone laws. Now, again, it's not
just about whether you're able to use, which
I think is important in the context of
any of these conversations. Whether it's a conversation
of, you know, not necessarily the second amendment,
but the idea behind it about well armed
militias and being able to arm yourselves against
potentially an authoritarian government. The reality being that
this is one element of that. Like, if
they have access to these drones, well, so
should you. Like, that's the reality of this.
And it's not we're not again, we're not
talking about tanks and and jets. We're talking
about, like, the small little drone that you
can fly and you could be able to
use and look and, you know, or obviously
use to conduct warfare, which would be a
crime, obviously, but the point is that that
is your right.
And so what's interesting is that they're
creating a justification, even if this is real,
to
reauthorize something that continues to restrict those rights.
On top of that, I think that the
smaller real point in the context of what
this will lead to,
which I guarantee will be a call from
and here comes Elon Musk and Donald Trump
and Vance and Teal and the technocratic future,
and they're gonna rush into your AI efficiency
and your drone
response.
I mean, I promise you this is coming,
and we're gonna see it roll out in
this conversation. It's my opinion, obviously, but I'm
very certain that we're gonna see these next
4 years explode and blossom into that direction
as they're already telling you. I mean, Elon
just can't stop being excited about it online,
about the new things he's gonna roll out.
And the point is that you're gonna see
more drones
for your protection, of course. But what that'll
mean as Derek has been highlighting extensively
is all of the different ways that they
will this will rationalize the removal of your
rights. More surveillance, more,
invasive,
you know, biometric tracking. All these different things
we've seen, facial recognition. That's what these things
will be doing.
This is very easy to prove.
That should concern us.
Now here is the new one from today.
New Jersey drone sightings may be nuclear sniffers
following a little elevated NYC radiation levels. Now
what's interesting to me,
regardless of what they're just, you know, saying
maybe that's where it collided, I just the
point is that this became a narrative on
13th when somebody floated this out, which is
right here.
And this is Bob's news. Says, this account
was deleted,
yet it's the most believable reason I've seen
in all these journals. Which is interesting, because
it was an account with basically zero following.
Now he's got more. But he came back,
as he even says right here.
Oh, I guess it just happened by the
way, because these were here a second ago
when I looked.
Yeah. He says, I'm back. I admit, I
was spooked by the response. Now, you can
decide for yourself whether that's valid or not.
That his back seems to be a little
suspicious to me ultimately, because I think it
was weird that it was deleted.
The account, like, right after it started being
put out. But what what it says is,
I'm one of the few groups of people
who no. We have no idea who this
is. Who ex who know exactly what the
drones are in New Jersey. This tweet will
go in the in the void. I have
no followers, but I'll share it anyway. He
says, what you're seeing is our American made
nuclear detector drones. Which is my point in
showing this now is it's interesting that this
is now being floated by another person whose
the video's up. He I'll show you. He's
a drone,
manufacturer, I think we'll get to in a
second. And you see a lot of these
mainstream alternative media partisan elements jump in and
go, we know it. We're proving it just
right now despite right before that, we knew
it was Blue Beam. After that, we knew
it was fake. After that, we knew that
it was Space Force. Now wait, wait, wait.
Now we know it. You know, it gets
I just hope people can reflect on how
obvious it is that people who are trying
to lead these conversations
are just jumping from one thing to the
next they're proving when clearly nothing's been proven.
This is interesting, though. Who knows where this
guy is, where he came from,
who made this come out?
But he's saying they can detect the presence
of gamma rays miles away. That that's the
stuff we we attribute to radiation.
He says in the late 2000, DOD needed
a response
to a response to the threat of dirty
bombs from ISIS
coming to our ports in New York, which
if frankly, I don't even whether that was
real or not, remember, the ISIS is an
Israeli US proxy element. So you can connect
those dots. It says they've been stoking up
these drones for a while.
Stalking. Excuse me. Now realize we're talking about
ISIS in this context, and it says were
some were deployed to Ukraine when Russia threatened
the use of dirty bombs,
which didn't happen. Russia was not never threatening
to use dirty bombs on Ukraine. That's a
narrative that was spun up. But it says
they look weird because they're heavy and have
giant,
cryocoolers
mounted on the giant horn antennas to communicate.
Well, by the way, I've seen plenty of
these videos that do not seem to suggest
that kind of makeup. And it says, this
is where I come in. The technology these
drones have we use have few suppliers,
both for Mwave equipment and the high purity
German germanium.
Now remember that as we point to the
few people that are you know, technologically advanced
and and major drone creators.
And it says, the same suppliers that aren't
the backbone of my industry. So so what
are they doing? Collecting information in how public
will react, SIOP,
and testing their ability to sweep a port
city like New York for dirty bombs. So
I guess, technically, he's arguing they are testing
for something or but on top of that,
just kind of sussing out how you react.
And that if let's just say that's true.
That's a good example of how there's dual
purpose to these things.
Then he finishes by saying,
so what are they doing? Oh, that's what
we just read. It says Jersey was was
chose because we are the closest port to
New York.
And it says, again, because in scenario, we
have a threat of a dirty bomb and
the public doesn't yet know, the DOD needs
to know how the public would react if
they did this. What many don't realize is
Ukraine is the reason we're here, he says.
That was the first time we deployed them
in a combat zone, but make no mistake.
So interesting talking about these drones being deployed
in Ukraine, so that means Ukraine is a
potential culprit
within this narrative.
It says, make no mistake, therefore, protecting the
homeland as DOD bought 100 of 1,000
to act as swarms capable of sweeping a
city. That seems very relevant now that we're
seeing these things roll out like crazy.
And it says, should note, not a military
expert, but spent 1 third of my career
as an RF engineer. We're only hired in
military, telecom, and finance. I'm speculating that this
is just a drill, but know exactly what
those drones are. My guess is Iran's situation
made the drill a priority.
Make no mistakes. A dirty bomb is or
was until now the greatest threat to America.
Now you I could go along with that.
I don't know if I think it's the
greatest threat, but it's definitely a threat. But
my point would be that I don't believe
that the people that would need to manufacture
a dirty bomb are the ones that are
actually a threat to America.
You could piece that together.
A few going off to New York City
and Central LA would cripple us, which my
point is any bomb would. And I think
that's more likely a threat to come from
a larger state actor that doesn't need to
make a dirty bomb. They love to make
it out to be some random ISIS element
in a cave when in reality, we're talking
about the I US and Israeli funding that
creates that. You know? So realize what we're
talking about.
It says,
and how do I know they are not
foreign owned? Well, because I'm confident they're these
kind of drones, HPGE.
But even if you don't believe me, you
can see that they have bright lights on
them to keep the aircraft safe. Yep. That's
obvious. These are FFA compliant.
So that was floated back on 13th.
So now this article, they're simply highlighting this,
which I'll play for you next,
saying that they're
basically doing exactly that. He's saying that these
are drones based on a and a statement
from somebody you don't get to verify that's
in the government that says there were bombs
from Russia,
interesting overlap, that were in these areas.
I'll let it play. You could read listen
to it for yourself.
Now, I personally don't think this connects.
I mean, not to maybe they are sniffing
for some kind of nuclear technology, but I
just the argument that this is ISIS,
I'm not even saying he's saying that, but
or, you know, or Russia or Iran, just
to me, it doesn't connect. It doesn't make
any sense why this would be going on
now with with any of this. I mean,
even if you look at what just happened
with Syria, why would this be happening?
That matters. Now, that doesn't have to mean
that you can say Just because you don't
know why, that means it it's just ignore
it. But it is important to consider. And
it says, what you're seeing is American made
HGB,
HPGE
nuclear detector drones.
I think that was the only thing I
highlighted in there, so let's play this clip.
And Joe Rogan said, this is the first
video about these drones that has got me
genuinely concerned. I'll comment on it afterward. I
I think it's my point earlier. With all
that we can prove right now,
like, literally prove some of the worst things
I've ever had to see in my life
over the process of years. And I'm not
even just talking about genocide.
And this is what we're most worried about,
something that we can literally have basically, have
nothing but subjective anecdotes from people that might
know something to somebody they can't verify,
which get could be exactly something. So my
point is obvious, though. Why would that be
what everyone's clamoring about?
Same answer.
Hey, everyone.
My name is John Ferguson. I'm the CEO
of Saxon Aerospace,
here in in Wichita, Kansas.
I'm not normally a TikTok kind of a
guy. I like watching this stuff every every
once in a while.
But I'm a manufacturer
of,
unmanned aircraft, military grade
unmanned aircraft, as you can see one of
my systems here.
There's all of these mysterious drones going on
off the East Coast. And as a as
a professional, as a subject matter expert,
I wanted to give you all my opinion
on what I think
could be going on with these drones.
I don't particularly believe that these have a
nefarious intent. I I could be wrong,
but I wanna give you the truth and
what I believe. It's my own opinion,
and I've not bounced this off of anybody.
So, you know, if you think it's bullshit,
whatever, that's cool. You know? I I don't
wanna spread misinformation
as we know that
there's a lot of that going around. But,
anyway,
back in the 19 eighties, Ronald Reagan had
dismantled the,
nuclear program,
and there were,
with Russia,
there
were countless,
nuclear missiles that were
that were disarmed
and disposed of.
Well,
there were
over 80, I believe. There were over 80,
nuclear warheads
that were in Ukraine that came up missing.
Okay?
We don't know where they are. Maybe somebody
does, but,
nobody really knows where these are. And I,
you know, I speak with some pretty high
level government officials on this stuff, and
it seems as though that is the case.
So
I spoke to a gentleman,
a few months ago
who
was trying to raise an alarm
to the highest levels of our government, which
they had their ears closed,
about
this one particular nuclear warhead that he physically
put his hands on. He physically touched this
warhead.
So we're told.
We don't know who he is, where he
comes from, if he's even real, or if
that happened. Or if he knows if he
said that, and he didn't even it's lying
to him.
Certainly consider this. But I just think it's
this it's crazy that this is the peak
conversation
that this because this is like, right now,
I was even just looking Alex Jones' broadcast
says, has Alex has discovered the mystery of
the drone invasion. Wait. This is what he's
talking about.
Well, they didn't discover it. He's simply pointing
at the same information that we've all seen.
It was posted on 13th. But what's interesting
is that, clearly, this is completely subjective.
It could be entirely true,
but an honest researcher, investigator, journalist would not
point to it as fact
with based on this guy saying he heard
from somebody we can't verify. But I'm I
think I think it's interesting because I'm gonna
get to the point to where I think
this narrative is coming from.
That was left over from Ukraine.
And he knew
that that thing was headed towards the United
States.
Okay?
Now right here, that could be Ukraine, obviously,
which I think is very important to consider
as much as many people won't wanna connect
that dot because Ukraine's the good guy, it's
the lie they're telling themselves. The Azov movement
is one of the obvious radical elements to
all this today, but it also could be
Russia. That's certainly possible, seeing as how they're
involved in this location. But who else is
there?
Israel, the United States, plenty of other elements,
if that's even actually what's happening. Very serious
deal. And everyone knows
that
the United States government, this administration,
is pushing to get into a war with
Russia.
With Now that's an interesting statement. Right? I
mean, I definitely
think it's obvious that during Trump's administration, during
Biden's administration, they were doing the same thing.
Right? They are the same kind of hostile
elements. Like, even and what's funny is as
much as they tried to frame Trump as
being, like,
secretly owned by Russia, which drove him to
be in in a way many very hostile
towards Putin in a lot of ways. But
in in a way, the point is ultimately
the support for Ukraine and what they're doing
in there. And it's not about left versus
right. It's just to make sure it's my
point is always is that it it supersedes
anyone's administration.
The reality
is that to say that they were desperate
to get to war with Russia,
it's a fair point to make that they're
constantly poking and constantly trying to undermine. And
maybe the argument is they wanna create war
with Russia. Now the I just stopped short
of the logic of why that would be
the case outside of something that
I mean, how do you think that that
benefits the interest of the United States?
I don't think it does. So it's more
about power shifting and and and territory and
geostrategic
control. Right? Oh, and pipelines and whatever else,
and that does cause conflict. But whether they
were really trying to get to war with
Russia, well, I tend to find that to
be a part of scenario about an anti
Biden idea that he's the one and Trump's
gonna be bringing all the that's what I
see about these things. And reality being that
your government has been hostile to all of
these entities, but whether it's about going to
war,
I think we can prove without question right
now that the wars that US government's been
in for decades have been because of Israel's
interests.
And
I don't think they wanna go with war
to war with Russia, but you can decide
for yourself. We all know that. We all
feel it. We all see it.
Okay?
We'll back up a few years. Do you
all remember when those drones were mysteriously flying
across the interstate seventy corridor
from Colorado up into Nebraska down here into
Kansas and out into Missouri.
Well, it was believed
that
those drones were
looking for
radioactive material because there had been some
material that come up missing
here in the United States,
and they felt like it was,
high probability that it would the nuclear or
the radioactive material would be taken along the
interstate 70 corridor
heading east or west
or south. So
I from what we understand,
they
were out there trying to find this radioactive
material.
Now drones,
they have
no reason
to be in the air
at night
unless you're doing some type of ISR work,
intelligence surveillance reconnaissance,
you know, looking for bad guys
or looking for
a victim, a search and rescue victim or
law enforcement
or some type of military
project.
Right?
There's no reason for a drone to be
flying at night,
really.
Okay?
Because they don't see shit.
So,
you know, unless you have thermal optics,
drones really don't see stuff. You need to
do mapping during the day. If you're gonna
do farming stuff, mostly do it during the
day.
The only reason why you would ever fly
an aircraft,
an unmanned aircraft at night, is if you're
looking for something.
Whether it be a person
or trying to smell gas. We have methane
gas detecting
detection systems,
that can
that can detect
gas leaks in pipelines.
You really wouldn't use thermal optics for trying
to find gas leaks just simply because
the only way you're actually gonna find
a gas leak with thermal optics is if
the gas leak is aggressive enough that it
has a difference in temperature.
Because radio, thermal
imaging,
it it creates a digital image based off
the temperature variance. So whatever is different in
temperature,
it creates an image.
Gas
usually, gas leaks so slow
that it
goes quickly into ambient
be you know, before you can even see
it. So we have special sensors
that can detect gas leaks. We also have
special sensors
that can detect
radioactive material.
So,
with this gentleman
that I had, spoken with who was trying
to raise the alarm to try to get
somebody in the government to say, hey. We
need to work together to go try to
find this nuclear warhead.
None of that ever happened.
They knew that warhead was on its way
to the United States.
That's all
that ever came of it.
Nothing ever happened.
Now right there is a really important thing.
So playing for a minute into it that
let's just say that's true. And let's also
be very clear again that we know that
it's com no. Completely unverifiable.
And even if it is what happened, he
could have been lied to. My point though
is let's just, for sake of conversation, consider
that. So we're talking about a nuclear warhead
or some element of a dirty bomb dynamic
that is being brought into the United States,
and your government was aware of it and
didn't do anything about it. Now there's pretty
obvious conclusions to form from that, that that's
something they wanted,
Right? Or that something that somebody else wanted
that they were being paid to allow or
blackmailed to allow.
And then, ultimately, that suggests there's an agenda
playing out. Now that could mean that this
is something being done to you and that's
the end game or that, ultimately, it's about
a false flag. And how many times have
we been hearing this? How many times has
Israel essentially threatened that something's going to happen
if we don't do what they say because
Hamas, because of whatever else? And how many
times have we had evidence to suggest that
they have plans laid out to effectively do
so to I mean, you have to realize
this stuff is not secret. Like, everything else
we talk about with Zionism or the origin
point,
it's disregarded. It's called racist, but it's very
well documented. And this context, I think it's
very concerning
that we have the
hypothetical
situation where they might be discussing a bomb
that was allowed to come into this country.
And now with these elements of the drones
flying around, like I mean, here's an interesting
overlap to consider.
Maybe that maybe exactly what he's saying is
the point,
and this is being done
in conjunction with parts of your government with
a foreign entity, and this is currently your
government trying to find something
without you knowing that happened.
Now that right there, outside for the outside
of the last part would be an easy
jump to goes, well, that's Biden doing that.
And they're, you know, they're they're working to
you know what I mean? Like, they'd blame
it on the current part of the government,
but then why would they be searching for
it?
You see what I'm saying? And maybe that's
because some other element jumped in to do
so, and then why wouldn't they call it
out or shoot them down?
Well, it's all theoretical. So that's always how
that goes. We don't know. But it's interesting
to point out that if that's true,
instead of just jumping into it's being done
against Trump to sacrifice his next agenda, which
is the general point you're getting from the
information of alternative media,
it's very it's it's just as likely that
everybody's involved
and that you're the one being played.
This government did not do anything
at all to help this
gentleman raise the alarm
and raise awareness
that there is a very,
deadly weapon on its way to the United
States.
It's out there. Nobody knows where it's at
now. It it left Europe. Now it's gone.
A pretty dangerous thing to float out there,
which is clearly being picked up. It's very
being and everybody's talking about it.
And now the idea is that we know
that's the case, which, again, we don't, but
that is what that's what most of the
people talking about it that I see online
are currently saying. Now we know there's a
bomb in the country and that's what they're
looking for and they're trying to hide it.
And it's all being kinda lumped against Biden's
fault somehow even though, again, there's so many
other elements to point to. I'm trust me.
Biden is a criminal and he's absolutely part
of anything we're pointing to in my opinion,
but it's not just about his administration.
But I find that pretty interesting. Now that
is kind of the ar the argument is
that, you know, there's this plant in a
I mean, think about what that creates.
Just the simple hype that there is this
secret thing here
will rationalize all sorts of Orwellian surveillance and
crackdowns and suppression and tracking,
which is exactly what Derek has been screaming
about for a long time,
and that it's gonna happen during Trump's administration.
So
my guess,
my own guess,
is that these drones are not nefarious in
intent.
If they are, they are, but I doubt
it.
But if they are
are drones, the only reason why they would
be flying and flying that low is because
they're trying to smell something on the ground.
That's it. There's I see. That doesn't really
explain all that we've seen, though. I mean,
other than the fact that maybe most maybe
many of them are as most a lot
of them have been shown are actually old
or fake or something like that. But I
don't know. That doesn't for me, that doesn't
feel like that answers all that we've seen,
but may maybe so. No other reason for
a drone to be flying in the air
other than to piss a bunch of people
off at night.
That's it.
So
my belief is they're trying to smell
something on the ground,
gas leaks,
radioactive material,
whatever.
So
and
do I think that, that they're coming up
out of the ocean?
No. I don't think so.
Drones
that are multicopter type drones, not the not
the, you know, the the fixed wing aircraft
that look like regular airplanes, but the multicopters,
you know, they only have so much battery
life. They have hybrid versions that are gas
powered with electric,
but those can still only fly for a
short period of time. There's no way in
hell that any drone is gonna go miles
off the off the coast as a multicopter
and fly into
the interior of the United States
and do a bunch of work and then
turn around and fly back. It's just physics
will not allow that to happen.
So
these drones, I believe, are launched from an,
a location that
nobody knows,
but I do believe that that they're flying
low enough that they're just trying to sniff
the ground and try to find something. So,
again,
I hate to be a pessimist
or a guy that thinks, you know, directly
to the negative.
However,
I do I know as as a professional,
I mean, we build
professional stuff for the military.
You know, I believe
that they're actually out there trying to smell
something that's very important.
So, anyway,
let me know what you think of this
video. I'm not trying to gaslight.
I'm not trying to scare people. I'm just
trying to let people know that this is
a serious deal.
There it's it's only serious
for what the potential could be, you know,
or for what the potential is.
You know?
There's a lot of them out there. They're
flying all over. They're flying low. They're flying
at night. There's no reason for it other
than to smell something. So, anyway, God bless.
I hope you all have a wonderful merry
Christmas, and let me know what you think
of the video. Thank you.
Well, very interesting.
Now as somebody rightly pointed out in the
chat,
it's interesting that when you have these kind
of what seemed to be setups for potential,
you know, action,
maybe false flag, maybe using a real event
in order to drive you in, which also
could be the same category.
But just as a coincidence, Ukraine joins NATO
counter drone exercise for the first time in
history.
Few months ago,
September 2024,
450 participants from 19 NATO allies and 3
partner countries gathered in Netherlands to test the
ability of commercially available counter drone systems to
operate seamlessly together.
For the first time,
Ukraine participated alongside members of the private sector
of research community. Okay. Well, so if if
the argument is we're talking about dirty bomb
elements or nuclear elements in Ukraine that have
made their way back to the United States,
you know, I
maybe it's in maybe it's not connected. But
I think the trappings of what we usually
see in this stand out. And what do
you always see before something like that? Almost
almost I mean, I actually almost think literally
every time in the past you could find
a training exercise that's right before one of
these large events.
Could be coincidence.
But I don't believe in those.
Now, as Joe Rogan said, you know, about
this clip of the guy saying this is
the first time that I've been concerned.
This is what I was pointing out before,
and this is from today. He says, I
have Alex Jones responds to this and says,
I have confirmed with my sources in USNORTHCOM
that this is indeed the purported reason the
drones are swarming the and the New York
New Jersey, New York area. But there is
a lot more to it. I'm headed to
the office to shoot a report that'll be
released today, which is what I'm just telling
you. That's out right now,
which is the bombshell exclusive. Alex has discovered
the mystery. It's just him. Alex Wright every
time. Right? Despite the fact that this is
something floated by many people before this or
that guy. Of course, the point is I
reached out to my sources in in North
US Northcom. Okay. You know, otherwise called the
government.
Right? So this total outsider fighting the deep
state reaches out to the government, the deep
state or just the government to be accurate,
and says, hey. Tell me what's going on.
They go, well, that's the story you heard.
I I confirmed it. Everyone follow me. The
government just let us know, but we're fighting
the government, so we're clear. Okay. Nate,
night watch Nate responds, my sources in quotes,
How is that any different than the legacy
media clowns making up headlines by quoting official
sources? That's a good point.
But, ultimately
and, Lionel,
basically, kinda making the same point, says, the
same government that misled you about the Chinese
spy balloon, COVID, inflation,
Ukraine, Nord Stream, many of which overlap the
Trump's administration too. So, again, just the government,
guys,
And spun up narratives about life in America
over the past 4 years,
now expects us to believe that they're being
truthful about these drone sightings.
Well,
Alex believes them. Now, of course, he could
have inside sources that are not on the
side. That's usually how that gets played. Right?
The white hats inside the secret jar. Well,
I can point to a 1000 examples of
him or anybody else on that part of
the mainstream alternative side that reference things like,
we know it's blue beam a few days
ago, which now saying something different.
Hopefully, you're honest enough to acknowledge that because
that means that you're being told certainty and
then the certainty changes day by day. Overall,
I think it's interesting what the guy is
saying, but it's just another data point. We
don't know for sure because he could have
been lied to. But where I think this
connects
is where it overlaps with an Israeli point
that was made. Now before we get to
that, I wanna highlight this article that came
out today.
Or I'm sorry. 13th. I guess I saw
it today. I thought it was new. But
even more even more relevant goes back to
13th.
Title, Trump team in talks with Biden and
Ukrainian officials about ending the war in Russia,
which one point on this, we're tracking again
to Ukraine today, is actually giving me more
positive indication that Trump may actually be ending
this.
But as you know my opinion, I kind
of don't trust that it's gonna be for
the interest of Ukrainians.
I hope I'm wrong about him. I hope
I'm wrong about all of them. I hope
it's just because he wants to help people.
That's I just don't know why that seems
to make sense for people, but I really
genuinely hope I'm wrong. Either way, the point
is and, again, Biden's same way, is that
what he says in this article, I'll show
you right now, gives me the indication that
there this may be in his interest to
do so if for maybe he just cares
about it. But either way, it's easy to
point out when this could be used to
benefit his career or benefit his agendas.
I don't honestly, I don't even care. As
long as it happens, same thing with Gaza,
that would be a very positive net positive
scenario to stop
the slaughterhouse of Ukrainians.
So I'll show you what I mean by
that. I just wanna point that out because
I do I really hope that is the
case. But I get the indicate I get
the feeling that whether it was Trump or
whoever they put into power in this position,
that this was something that was probably going
to happen in regard to a lot of
overlapping Israeli US agendas
and possibly even Russia. But
what it highlights oh, here's just the
hardly article.
President-elect Donald Trump's national security team has held
discussions with the White House and Ukrainian leaders
as part of a concerted effort to find
a way to end the war with Russia.
Multiple sources with knowledge of the matter told
NBC News. So let's be clear. You got
NBC News, an obvious partisan left leaning platform,
reporting positively about Trump working with Biden and
Ukrainian officials to end the war at the
White House.
Okay. Can we clearly highlight the fact that
that doesn't have I mean,
as always, there could be some secret behind
anything. But what this seems to indicate is
that Biden is helping Trump effectively
carry this out,
which will be a positive for Trump. It
it Biden is literally seemingly helping him commit
and complete one of his major promises to
finish this before he even gets in inaugurated,
which will be very positive for him. So
how does that line up with Biden's secret,
the long term, nefarious plan to destroy everything
Trump or every Democrat because they're all pedophiles
going after anything bad Republican?
Well, I think they're all actively fighting each
other for their own personal petty reasons, but
they're all on the same team fighting you
as well.
My point though is that we have to
stand back and realize that if what they're
pointing at or that this drone thing is
some secret plan to undermine and destroy Trump's
incoming administration, which Alex has been saying every
30 seconds for a week now,
how does that make sense?
And if this is the plan, why is
he currently working with Trump to execute something
before his benefit?
And why is NBC reporting on it as
a positive thing? You get my point.
And it says the president-elect has vowed to
end the conflict even before it's inaugurated next
month, which is what I was saying, calling
the casualties suffered on both sides a tragedy.
My point is I just get the feeling
from this, especially since Biden is working with
him in this context, that this will actually
come to an end, which would be a
good thing. It's just I don't want to
say anything about that. Oh, so basically, their
at meet the press was asking,
if he'd spoken to Putin
since his election. And he says, I don't
wanna say anything about that because I don't
want to do anything that could impede the
negotiation, which I have to be very clear.
That is not what you expect from Trump
in my opinion. So that is a
mature,
measured response from Trump in regard to something
that might actually need to happen.
Historically, what we get is him trying to
put himself in the front seat to look
like I'm in control, and I'm the one
doing this, and it's all because I made
this happen, and I'm the deal maker. Whether
or not you feel he's the savior of
your planet, you have to be honest about
how he is
very full of himself. Very he's a lot
of hubris. Maybe you could argue he has
a right to. The point nonetheless is that
in this context, you don't I didn't wouldn't
expect him
to be tight lipped because that may hurt
the negotiations where in other con other I
mean, many examples of the past, he
rushes right over the top and gives you
information that actually hurts him in the long
run or says the law the quiet part
out loud about Syria. You see my point?
So that's interesting to me. Again, does give
me the indication that he's very serious about
ending this probably just for his benefit, but
either way, net positive there.
Biden's national security adviser, Jake Sullivan,
has held several conversations with his named successor,
Mike Waltz,
which, you know, one of the many rapidly
Zionist
Israel controlled elements in his administration,
whom Trump has tapped to take over the
position. A senior administration official and other sources
familiar with the matter said. Now realize that
this is wild. They have yet to actually
include Trump in the ethics pledges. As far
as I can tell, unless I'm missing something.
I think that's exactly what I was worried
about. I mean, I I get it's gonna
get more and more opaque as this goes
forward, but I'm gonna make a reference about
this especially once we get past the inauguration.
Now you've got overlap of very clear Zionist
connected entities that have access to very top
secret information,
which probably already did to be quite honest.
But either way, it's more and more and
more influenced and infiltrated.
But the other point is that you have
Jake Sullivan and Biden and the White House
working with each other to carry to have
a peaceful transition, which seems to be like,
I remember I made that point back on
whether Alex or anybody else making the argument
that this is the democrats are doing everything
they can to destroy what comes next. And
I said, well, remember this. I don't see
any indication of that. Could be happened behind
the scenes. But when we get to a
point to where we see, hypothetically, that it
never happened,
remember that.
I just don't think people want to. I
think they're having too much fun pretending we're
in some kind of fight. You know, it's
it's crazy how serious it is and how
serious it is in certain context of their
conversation, but then whenever it needs to be,
it becomes a troll. It becomes fun. It
becomes you know, there's a lot of dishonesty
around this conversation, especially in this field.
And here's where it gets more interesting.
So David
Paulides
says, another opinion on the drones from an
Israeli.
Now, again, there's there's many of these you
could find.
This one is somebody who seems to be
somewhat
prominent and recognized from past situations. But to
me, it's really irrelevant other than the fact
that this is an Israeli highlighting that opinion
about how Israel might be involved. But it
I wanna stress,
in no way am I claiming that we
know for sure that this is the case,
that Israel's involved, or that that any of
these are even what we are claiming they
are. It's just another data point that I
think is very relevant to flesh out in
the
very in the context of a world the
foreign policy dynamic today and how obvious it
is that Israel is very clearly trying to
I mean, I don't even infiltrate is a
long time ago.
Whatever they're trying to accomplish through this government
is I mean, I would argue just complete
control, which might already be the case. I
know that's very difficult for some people to
think about, but it is objectively clear.
Maybe not every element, but obviously that their
objective is to control the outcome, which by
the way is not even that contentious in
the context of many other governments.
Every government in the world is trying to
manipulate the other governments for their benefit. The
point is that Israel goes as far as
to carry out suicide bombings and false flags
and all sorts of
manufacturing
consent that actually takes American lives. Like, you
know, the US is liberty or whatever else.
But Uri Geller
is is one of the world's most investigated
mystifiers.
So real just really quickly, the, where was
it down here, I think? Or oh, shoot.
I should oh, there it is. Josh,
Guta Gusteau points out something he did from
before. And just to point out, here's an
article of him saying, UFOs are real. NASA
showed me oops. NASA showed me an alien
spacecraft that I've been secretly contacting ET for
years. So just for context on who this
per says Uri Geller, or at least as
they recorded him as saying.
So keep with that in mind,
he writes, my dear friends, I just received
from this reliable source. So just like everything
else, completely unverifiable, which you should consider.
I will be speaking to my Israeli contacts
this morning to verify if this is true.
Let's do this too and see if he's
reported anything else.
Oh, there. I'll follow-up with that next. This
seems to be the next one. And he
says,
breaking
intel from a verified high level source with
top secret special access clearance, which
it just means a source at this point.
All those are words if you can't prove
what he's talking about. And it says, just
drop the bombshell info on us, the mysterious
drones being seen across the United States. He
says, these are our drones, and he's speaking
as an Israeli.
Tracking gamma rays linked to possible,
WMDs
in a massive counter terror operation. The the
Office of Global Access, OGA, a shadowy 3
meter agency, has deployed advanced surveillance assets to
hunt for a stray nuke or a mass
casualty weapon hidden in the East and West
coasts.
Mission objectives.
So here's where you get into the argument
being laid out of exactly
what the guy was saying.
A mission to investigate for potential nuclear problems.
He says, detect communications tied to the device,
talking about some kind
of, you know,
potential
device.
Mass casualty weapon is what he said.
Partner with law enforcement for rapid response.
Prevent mass panic while it's advancing intel operations.
Those are the objectives he's highlighting. Assets in
place as low altitude surveillance aircraft scanning for
signals, special ops units ready for instant action.
So, really, clearly, we're talking about government involvement.
I think I should be very transparent by
now. Cyber intel teams analyzing terror networks.
Sources say this could involve a submarine breach
of our SOSUS
warnings nets or our WMD hidden in a
cargo container or vehicle. The stakes are high
and government silence peaks volume. I mean, I'm
right just there. The point is what he
said first. Everything else, it's completely unverifiable at
this point. My sources warn this intel is
leaking now. Dirty bombs are worse. Could already
be here. Okay.
So to me, I'm not suggesting that this
is any more indication this is the real
story. I'm beginning to feel more and more
this is a narrative that is being put
out there.
And whether he's tapping into what his Israeli
sources are telling him or
that he's pushing this because he's part of
it or it's real. The point is that
right now, we don't know, but I think
what begins to connect is that this seems
to be something that's being driven.
And I say that largely because of the
way that this has been done by the
corporate media, by the western government. I mean,
it's weird how this has become this very
forceful narrative with basically no information. And it's
not just the US, it's the UK. It's
interesting.
So here's what he says after that.
So he says, friends, my answers remain unquestioned
unanswered. Excuse me. And there there my questions
remain unanswered. There and there are flaws in
almost all of my theories that are attempting
to explain the mystery drones. For instance, if
the drones are military grade surveillance drones that
are carrying out some kind of mission secret
secret mission,
such as tracking WMDs, then why have they
made no attempt to go undercover and prevent
mass panic?
Right?
These craft have consistently allowed themselves to be
seen as they again, that speaks a lot
to me. Right? They could have done as
the guy was saying before, why didn't they
turn lights off?
They want you to be seen. They want
this to be recognized.
And your government tells you there's no threat.
They're not foreign. I mean, it is very
it stands out.
Which allows a very easy to, you know,
to to stick your fingers in the middle
of it and be like, it's them going
after Trump, which is certainly one of the
possibilities.
But that seems to be in a very
self serving assumption. The obvious overlap should be
that they're all involved seeing as how there's
a lot of connective overlaps to the direction
this is going.
Space force, drones, Elon Musk. I mean, there's
a lot of stuff, but it says these
craft have consistently allowed themselves to be seen
as they have been displaying bright flashing lights
and hovering for long periods of time over
populated areas. Why would they do this if
they are attempting to carry out a secret
surveillance mission? Also, it is important to remember
that the sightings that are now occurring in
the US did not happen in isolation. This
wave of sightings all started many, many weeks
ago in the UK with mysterious drones being
hovering over several US military bases in England.
That tells you something. After that, similar sightings
then occurred in Germany over and over over
other
US bases.
Think about how I mean,
so either this is
a UFO going after only US things,
or it is a foreign entity that's only
going after US bases, but weirdly in many
separate countries, which makes no strategic sense really
unless there's something I'm missing.
Or it's the US government doing
it. Right? Or in conjunction with other elements.
Like, it just seems like that's
interesting. And so why would the US government
be using their own military grade drones to
conduct surveillance over their own military bases? This
does not make sense. Unless it's trying to
set you up to respond to this.
And he says and I I haven't read
this yet. He says, so I previously warned
it is likely that a number of possible
cover stories will be pub pushed to the
public. So any explanation that is officially offered
or championed by the media will need to
be properly examined and pulled apart. But perhaps
whoever is behind these sightings is already,
achieving what they set out to do.
Maybe the prime motive behind all of this
is simply to sow mass confusion and create
widespread anxiety, panic, and mistrust. Problem, reaction, solution.
By highlighting the inability of the US government,
in quotes, to stop or prevent what is
happening,
to get you to call for your own
subjugation. Or in this context, if you don't
think that's how it goes, to call for
the response that they're already ready to roll
out.
Knowing that they set you up to have
that reaction.
It says, ask yourself then, who might benefit
exactly?
Very I already made the point.
There's very clear elements that benefit from this.
And the point the people they're pointing to,
even in the context of, like, left versus
right, it just doesn't connect for me.
It doesn't re there's a thousand other ways
they could have run something out that would
have been easy to do. This is overly
complicated and has a lot of moving parts,
and it's already very clunky.
I just don't think it lines up, but
it certainly could.
If the drones are in fact connected to
UAP activity, then it is perhaps
a push from their side, from the Ukraine,
to try and force the US government to
finally disclose what they have been concealing for
so many years. Or actually
oh, maybe no. Maybe he means something in
regard to unknown elements. Or could this could
be a push from the inside faction of
those in the know who wanna make it
possible for the US government to continue to
conceal their knowledge from us. Now this is
about whether he believes in something else going
on in this context. So these are all
his opinions. Clearly from his old post that
does seem to be the case. Oh, look
at that. There he is next to Donald
Trump.
I'll include this too so you can read
that.
Was that
oh, that's right. Okay. So here is just
quickly to reference that now this will suddenly
be interesting to consider the fact that we
have this guy
in NewsNation. This was from 13th. He was
suggesting or saying in with the sheriff there
saying the same thing that they were able
to cloak their heat signature.
So what I said then is the same
is that if that's true, they could be
lying, but that's that'd be difficult to, you
know, that would be a difficult thing to
hide.
It then suggests that we're talking about high
level technology, which would suggest a foreign actor
or the US government and it's something new
that they don't want you to see.
Right? So that makes sense with what we
just highlighted.
Now these points are also relevant to this.
There's more to get into here. I looked
up the top 10 countries with the most
military drones in the world.
And what you'll find very revealing, and this
is funny because this is remember, they would
just had these drone exercises and so on.
This is new. This is from October 6th.
And it lists
US, Turkey, Poland, Russia, Germany, India, France, Australia,
South Korea, Finland, all d you know, declining.
So the US reportedly having 1300
13,000 drones.
Now if you go through this, what you
find is a very interesting standout.
Now of the
top ten,
you have 1, 2, 3. I think it's
4 of them total.
Oh, I thought it was 4. Maybe I
missed 1. But it at least 3. I
thought it was 4. Different in the top
10
who buy their drones from Israel.
So it's like, okay. Wait a minute. So
if they're making so money that they could
sell them to the some of the top
ten countries using them, isn't it kinda strange
that they're not listed in the top ten
countries? That's usually an indication of some kind
of controlled conversation. Right?
Here's what it lists out from Brave. Israel
drone numbers. It says the Israeli Defense Forces
operates a significant number of drones with estimates
ranging from 100 to 1,000.
Well, okay. That alone already puts them above
the number 2 slot, which is Turkey.
And it says according to 2017 estimates, Israel
accounted for more than
60%
of the international
UAV exports over the previous 3 decades. So
like damn near everything else in this conversation,
whether it's a spyware or whatever else, the
the 60%
of the market comes from Israel.
And they're selling these over the 3 decades
to many other locations.
Foreign buyers.
Then it goes IDF's drone inventory includes various
types, such as Hermes 450 attack drones, Hermes
900 attack drones, Heron TP reconnaissance surveillance drones,
or starlight star excuse me, Skylark reconnaissance and
surveillance drones.
2023,
Skydio, an American tech company,
supplied over a 100 drones to the IDF,
which I've again, it's that's what's funny about
that is how often that seems to happen
despite the fact that they don't need us
to pay for their stuff. They're already manufacturing
more than most everybody else, and they already
have enough to buy the it's just you
giving your tax dollars to support Israel's agenda.
That's all it is. And it says the
IDF has been actively integrating tactical drones into
its ground forces with units using small drones,
which become irrelevant because we have seen many
than more than just the big ones. Now
they simply write, they have hundreds of attack
drones. Those are the big ones.
They've got hundreds of reconnaissance surveillance drones, which
are the smaller ones, but they've also got
thousands
of small tactical drones used by the ground
forces, which clearly
clearly puts them above
number 2.
So I think it's very revealing that they
would not be listed in most of the
lists I've seen or any I I actually
didn't find anyone that listed Israel, which I
think is the point is this is how
Israel operates. Their nuclear ambiguity, they just hide.
They don't want you to see
because it's clear there's nefarious action going on.
That should be clear to everyone in the
world today.
So here is the intercept for May 17,
2024. An Israeli company is hawking its self
launching drone system
to the US police department.
To US police departments,
plural.
Which is just like everything else we're talking
about. So now you've got carb you know,
91 one call centers run by Israeli tech
startups. You've got Israeli tech startups populating this
country like chicken pox. You've got them dominating
50% of the spyware market that the US
is now rolling out in Trump's administration. You've
got Elon Musk working with groups that are
literally building out a
you can't hide spy network of satellites around
this country working with Israeli overlaps. You've got
them rolling out spy drones or really just
drones the US the US US police departments
are using. And realize how many times it's
been shown that Israel infiltrates
these tech this tech.
I'll grab that article since I bring it
up. But the frustrating reality is how very
documented this is like everything else.
This our this was our show from the
20th of September.
Israel's infiltration of US tech in light of
the Lebanon pager attack. We're 5 years that
happened. They seeded these pagers. They let them
populate Lebanon. And 5 years later, they executed
that. Killed children, killed innocent people. The government
covered it up, and the media covered it
up.
So the point is, if they're selling the
system to US police departments, I guarantee that
they're spying an infiltration on these things. That'd
be my opinion. And on that point,
everything else we're talking about. So is it
is it not possible that they have these
self launching drones
that were self deployed?
They don't want you to see that. Or
I mean, I'm just theorizing. There's any number
of possible things. Or the reality that these
are drones that are simply being facilitated through
both of them.
Now here
oh, that we already this is the one
I was showing earlier.
So just reiterating the idea of the Orwellian
law. Right?
The drone legislation.
So here
is a congressman
very aggressively hyping the idea that we know
for a fact that it's Iran. This is
a very Zionist influenced element.
Well, here's the real deal, Harris. You know,
I'm also on the transportation committee on the
aviation subcommittee, and I've gotten to know people.
And from very high sources,
very qualified sources,
very responsible sources, I'm gonna tell you the
real deal.
Iran
launched a mothership probably about a month ago
that contains these drones. That mothership is off
I'm gonna tell you the deal. It's off
the East Coast of the United States.
This is completely an first, I can tell
there's nothing that backs this up.
Where do you think it's coming from? Temp
America.
They've launched drones. It's everything that we can
see or hear. And again, these are from
high sources. I don't say this lightly. Now,
you know, we know there was a probability.
It could have been the our own government.
We know it's not our own government because
they would've let us know. It could have
been some really glorified hobbyist or hobbyist that
Can you imagine saying what he just said?
We
know that it's not our government because they
would've let us know.
That alone should make your suspicion stand up
on that. Like, there's that's crazy.
Despite the fact that they've withheld damn near
everything about I mean, it's just so lazy
to argue that. Clearly, they would lie to
you. They say so all the time for
national security.
But his argument is we know for sure
it's not them. Guys, that's exactly what you
would say to shift and pivot the conversation
to the fact that we know it's Iran.
There's only one real entity that's driving that,
and this is why we see this aggressively
through the Trump administration or just the US
government. It's Israel. They're so aggressively driving that
for decades.
And now that we see this rolling out,
it should be a very real consideration that
this is why it's happening.
And you're gonna see the people that are
gonna stop short, as usual,
and not point out the Israeli involvement with
everything we're talking about, whether it's globalism, technocracy,
great reset, all of it.
We're doing something unbelievable.
They don't have the technology,
but let's pretend that's possible. The third possibility
was somebody in adversarial country doing this. Know
that
Iran
made a deal with China
to purchase drones, mother ships, and technology
in order to go forward.
Yeah. You mean, like, literally everybody else in
the world. So now he's making the argument
that look, they bought drones. Like, every other
country you could point to. I mean, I'm
sure there's some that didn't, but that's a
pretty lazy point.
So by that logic, the US government's more
likely than Iran or Israel for that matter
because they bought a whole lot of drones
and have been testing them right up until
this point. You see, it's it's just a
cobble together narrative with nothing but
I I mean, I wonder if he's not
even subjective. I mean, these are just he's
almost making these things up.
The sources I have are good. They can't
reveal who they are because they are speaking
to me in confidentiality.
Of course. Of course. So that means they
don't exist or it's you know, I mean,
I'm kinda being facetious. The point is, to
you or me, somebody's watching, that that's how
they should take that. That means it doesn't
exist. Right? It's if if you it's an
anonymous source. That's the US government style.
Right? That is the or corporate media style
to just float an anonymous source that claims
from the US government as opposed to actually
doing your job, which is to speak truth
to that power as opposed to blindly acquiesce
to what it's telling you to do. Either
way, he is part of the government, and
he's clearly
seeding this narrative because somebody is driving this
through him. These drones should be shot down
whether it was some crazy hobbyist that we
can't imagine
or whether it is Iran, and I think
it very possibly could be they should be
shot down. We are not getting the full
deal, and the military is on alert with
this.
Look, you you've given us some pretty
dire information just here, and I wanna make
sure that our viewers are digesting this.
Iran
has the capability
to pull up along our eastern seaboard
and launch drones the size of an SUV.
Don't you love that?
Breaking. We're about to repeat what he said
with nothing to back it up as absolute
fact because news.
How absurd.
What a clown that person is.
This guy comes on and tells you something
he can't an anonymous person said,
and you go you literally break and go
repeat. Like, you listen to what she just
did. The way she reports this.
She is saying that as fact based on
what he just told her.
That's it.
I mean, I I mean, I don't need
to stress the idea that these people are
not actually journalists.
It's just embarrassing that they pretend that way.
Testing
this. Pretty
dire information just here, and I wanna make
sure that our viewers are digesting this.
So somebody got in her ear and said
repeat that and make it fact. RAND has
the capability
to pull up along our eastern seaboard
and launch drones the size of an SUV
into the skies of several states, particularly New
Jersey, where we know the incoming president has
a large home,
also in the same county or nearby
where some of these drones in New Jersey
have been seen.
What I mean, think think of that. We
should be laughing at these people, the way
you just cobble this together into the direction
of what everyone wants to hear. You don't
have anything to back any of that up.
The point is that what she's highlighting is
technology that, yes, they all are probably capable
of, every single one of them. If you
think like, the reality is, as I've said
many times, which is funnily in a funny
way now being proven,
despite people in this very side saying it's
there are a bunch of people in caves,
Iran is very technologically advanced.
The point though is that so too is
the United States and Israel, and the reality
is that to claim that they have the
ability to bring up
whatever you know, mothership is a stupid framing
of this. I think that's meant to be
weirdly overlapping with the UFO conversation. The reality
though is that you can launch drones, larger
elements of it. They can release smaller ones
like they literally all can.
Now the point
is they did it along the coast. Well,
that would mean the US government would be
able to see that.
And they've allowed it or now saying they
didn't, or it's not a threat, and we
can prove that, which either means they're doing
it or it's Israel or hiding that. Right?
I mean, it just just doesn't make any
sense. That's where you get them sticking their
finger in saying it's against Trump, but then
that also doesn't make sense. Because of how
obviously you can see them working together and
they're not pointing these things out.
The usual the partisan narratives usually end up
end up this way, and it's always taking
advantage of a moment where there isn't a
complete story. Right? Where the honest person would
say, well, we don't know, and we leave
it there. That's where these grifters
lurch into the conversation and fill in the
blanks with what they want every time.
And sometimes they guess right, but the reality
is that this is how we see it.
The mainstream alternative media is the corporate media.
That capability exists.
It's possible some of those drones are here.
So I have 2 questions.
How are they fueling them? They have to
land somewhere. Drones don't fly forever. Why don't
they close down the airspace? Yes. It's inconvenient.
Yes. It's the holidays.
Shut it down. But if you start shooting
things That's an interesting statement. And you don't
know how they're fueled. That's gonna be mass
explosions. This isn't like one spy balloon.
Congressman, this is serious. See my point. They
just it's like, you know, Assad gas catacombs
and Chinese spy balloons and and Iran nuclear
weapons and just all these dumb things that
we can literally show that their own sources
tell you isn't true. But, you know, who
cares about the truth? Right? It's all about
the narrative today.
We've gotta bring them down, and we've gotta
find a way to bring them down. I
don't know exactly where they're landing. Obviously, I
have some information. And, again, this isn't just
Jeff Van Drew. Oh, let's, you know, let's
get on Harris Faulkner show and say something
outrageous. I'm tell Well, that's usually a good
indication that he's being dishonest.
Right?
I'm not lying. I swear. And it's not
just me lying over here. It's totally true.
Trust me. Not a good sign. A straight
deal from very high
positioned individuals who are telling me this. And
the bottom line is they're launching them. They
are across the country. We don't even have
anything like this. No. Our government and also
certainly our hobbyist. Anything like
what? Something you have yet to verify? Something
you're both guessing at blindly because someone told
you something?
It's just it's irresponsible
is what it is. No. So think about
it. It's not only do I have the
information, but it's also common sense. We've gotta
get them down. We've gotta determine how they
function, what they do, make sure that we
can get them, and you're right, in a
safe way. When I say shoot them down,
get them down any way that you can,
but right now they're probably extracting information. This
is a clear and present danger. Right. Did
you did you catch that? But totally in
a safe way, but shoot them down any
way you can. So do anything you can
to get them down, but totally in a
safe way.
I just it's almost like they are trying
to create chaos, which by the way is
usually how this works. To the United States
and to our president-elect,
and it's a serious business.
Right. So, of course, it's all about going
after Donald Trump, and it's all about the
bad guys and where who benefits from all
of that?
It's pretty easy to see.
So as Doug and Stacy point out, when
you finally realize it, it will be too
late. And this is where I grabbed that
image from today. Thank you, Doug and Stacy.
Now, the point is that this game,
the game they just went to, the navy
game, the point is you could see them
on the thing and just,
funded by Palantir or at least they have
ads there. And the point is not to
say that that's some big bombshell. The point
is just to connect the dots of where
this is all going. And the point that
Doug here is making is this simply that
there is something else to this. Not even
whether it's about the drone or not. The
larger picture, as you can see, Elon, Vance,
and Trump in this picture, and and Mike
as well, the point is that they're all
I mean, guys, this this is not outsider.
These are not outsiders.
I mean, arguably, you could say that these
are the deep state, especially people like Elon
Musk. But either way, you know, the unelected
power structure, but now you're about to see
something. Well, even then, he's unelected. He got
picked.
But the point is about the overlap of
the technocratic direction, the Palantir overlap with Israel,
the Palantir overlap with the drone conversation, and
just a bigger idea of where this all
goes.
If you believe you're you know, the outsiders
fire the deep state, you're gonna roll out
some new American freedom time frame, These people
are literally laying the groundwork for exactly the
opposite of that. I mean, on the surface,
but they just call it something else,
which is usually how this works. And let's
not forget.
And you can prove
how closely tied Palantir, specifically
Teal and Karp, by the way, even though
he they point the point is Karp was
on the side of,
Kamala Harris
endorsing, and then Teal was on the other
side with Trump.
Point is that it didn't really matter what
you pretended you were picking if that even
actually translates. It ultimately ended up supporting the
the agenda, Israel and Palantir.
And that's but plus more than that, obviously.
But in the context of this conversation, this
is Bloomberg, Tia's Palantir
strategic partnership with Israel
in January 2024, well into the genocide.
Happy. And it look clearly, this guy was
like, well, my I don't want my face
being seen.
Interesting.
Or that's some kind of top secret game.
Whatever. The point is they're happy to work
alongside Israel to use your AI technology
to kill children, which we'll get to in
a minute.
I'll give I'll give you lavender at least
from this article. Make sure you read that.
The information showing you that that's what they're
doing. And the clip we play with Teal
where he's just mumbling through answering why that's
okay, it's obvious they know what they're doing.
So
to me,
I mean, if you're willing to ignore a
genocide for your profit, you're a monster. An
absolute monster.
And here is the clip that was played
at that game.
And guess what? It's a Palantir advertisement. Can
you imagine what it shows?
That's Palantir.
I just think that's absurd. Like the timing
of all of this.
And as truth seeker points out, Palantir aired
this commercial during an army navy game
showing drones being released from a ship. Further
proof it's all a psyop, but I wouldn't
say proof, not even remotely, but I just
find that very revealing.
When they have a very clear interest in
controlling the market, in controlling the infrastructure of
our drone surveillance, of restricting like controlling the
airspace in that context as it pertains to
drones through legislation, working with foreign governments to
use these I mean, countless, countless ways. Now
I even I even, added elements of this.
Well, I'll I'll get to you in a
second regard to, like, where I think this
may be going. But here, Darren Plumwood says
the reason all these drones have lights on
is because they want to be seen. That's
the point we made earlier. This suggests that
they are not a foreign adversary, which leaves
only 2 options.
They're not of this world or they belong
to our government
or groups they're working with. It is likely
the latter, and it says we're all being
played. This is one of these images you
can see of these
whatever they're claiming this is. And help me
to be clear by the way, a lot
of these things have already been broken down
as not what they appear to be.
Now, Douglas McGregor, which I'm not sure where
I think he stand I stand on him.
I mean, he makes state we may all
go I'll show him a statement for him
later in the show from Syria. But he
says, breaking as of yesterday. Drones are now
reported over the US capital. What's HICCO just
be highlighting that for you? But but but
at the same time, I just I'm very
cautious about who seems to be driving this
narrative and why.
But the US capital now
And this person says, what do you think
of this? And shows you these same images
that just keep popping back up from that
same account with the same narrative.
And this person highlights this saying, they're doing
this as an attempt to stop Donald Trump,
says modern warfare with Alex Jones. I wonder
where he got that from.
And it says, COVID failed to stop Trump.
Assassination attempts failed to stop Trump. Now they're
going with aliens. Okay. So let's see. That's
deviating from the you know, it's all over
the place. So now they're go they're doing
this so they can steal power from Trump
with continuity of government. Now that was what
Alex was reporting a few days ago. Even
though now it's completely shifted. Even though when
that was happening, it was completely we know
for sure. My secret sources tell me we
know for sure. Consumative government is a principle
that ensures well, that that we've already gone
over that. The reality of I just read
it. A principle that ensures a government can
continue its essential operations in the event of
a catastrophic event. And it's a way that
it is created essentially a parallel government in
this country.
Alex says, this is 100% the deeps to
death the
desperate deep state system getting ready to pull
some serious s h I t to stop
Trump.
And then it turns out that it's not
real. This video is not related to the
recent unmanned aerial vehicles reported in New Jersey.
This video shows drones part of a blizzard
holiday party at Knott's Berry Farm,
a holiday light show at a family amusement
park.
Oops. But who cares? We'll just rush forward
and jump to the next one. Okay? That's
how this works for the mainstream alternative media.
Here is Daily Mail. Ex CIA officer gives
chilling drone theory as terrified residents sound the
alarm as crisis spreads.
Three different ways they push that in the
headline.
And it says, Baldwin said, now in turn
and this is the c former, in quotes,
CIA.
Now in terms of who is behind this,
seeing the statements that have been made to
John by John Kerry, who has said that
these objects are not operating illegally,
which is a very interesting statement. That would
be about the lights, obviously. And it says,
coupled with these several op eds that have
been out there in the last 24 hours
about the need to look at our detect
detection systems,
very real,
makes me think perhaps this is actually a
classified exercise to test either evasion technology or
detection technology in urban areas.
So, I I honestly, when coming from an
ex CIA for the daily mail, probably what
they want you to hear. But either way,
the point would be even if it's just
giving you her thoughts, one, obviously, should be
whether, like, this is about react getting a
reaction to justify a next step.
But however you wanna read that, the point
is about some kind of classified operation. Right?
Well, as Jason points out, think mystery drones
are sketchy. Wait until you hear about project
star shield. And how Elon Musk has partnered
with US military and intelligence agencies to create
a massive surveillance network of low orbit satellites
that are capable of rapidly locating targets almost
anywhere on Earth.
There's a thousand ways that overlaps.
But being able to detect these things from
satellites, maybe that's being tested in real time.
Either way, this is the article that Derek
wrote, which is what he was referencing.
The quote from the National Reconnaissance Organization is
you can't hide, is what he said. That's
literally the the clip. And in fact, I
should even play that. It's right here.
You know what? I probably have to
yeah. It's okay. That it that's all it
really says. They get into it and he
says, from last June, December of this year,
we'll have probably launched a 100 satellites.
So we are going from the demo phase
to the operational phase. So it's funny how
now that they're in the, quote, operational phase
is when we start seeing these things rolled
out, when they just had exercises back in
September.
And it says where we're where we're really
going to be able to start testing all
of this stuff out in a more operational
way.
Right.
One of that could be to release drones
to be able to test your satellite infrastructure,
whether they can detect and surveil everything.
Just theorizing, just an opinion.
And it says, what we are going to
be doing,
they are part of the proliferated architecture to
go to go off it and get us
reasonably high resolution imagery of the Earth and
high rate speed, he says. Now
you can't
hide because you're constantly being looked at.
That's Elon Musk and the
height of the US intelligence apparatus surveillance network.
The NRO provides surveillance even for the NSA.
Elon Musk is currently working with star x
with SpaceX
to create
what what you're looking at right there.
And ascent essentially, a
all connected to surveillance grid around the planet
in sir with satellites.
Elon Musk and SpaceX are helping US intelligence
to build the world's largest spy satellite network.
Kinda think that's related to this.
Now, on the UFO part of it, you
saw a lot of this get floated as
I said before. I don't I don't I
mean, aside from the open objective possibility of
anything.
I don't I tend to think it's interesting
how this always pops up in the conversation
and I think there's a very clear agenda
around this, which is why blue bean was
one of the things that was, you know,
should have been considered to start was forcefully
stated as the fact when it for some,
it started. The point is it's a it's
an idea
of,
a it's an idea of, psychological
operation of projecting something
and the context should be and by the
way, it's a very real thing. It's a
very real project and it's not something that
should be dismissed. And the argument is around
something either projecting a UFO
invasion or even the second coming of Christ.
Right? So that would be the idea of,
you know,
imagine how people would respond if you put
something that is very realistic in the sky
that looked like a bunch of alien in
in invasion happening. People would actually I mean,
many of us would be skeptical, I think,
but most people would probably fall for it
because it's very hard to not to deny
what you're looking at. Right? And so the
point about that is whether that might have
been something that this was, Which to me,
it it very, very early began to demonstrate
that there was real examples of something. So
that was very quick for me to be
like, that seems unlikely, but don't disregard the
possibility.
This person says, this is possibly the best
and clearest video ever of these drones approaching
a UAP.
And then it as it touches the UAP,
the UAP shoots it down. Now, again, what
the the UAP was,
they like, a a UFO reference. Unidentified flying.
No. That's the UFO.
I mean, I think it's the same kind
of point. I'll make sure I just have
the right acronym.
It is
unidentified aerial phenomena. Yeah. So that's it's meant
to be more indicative of something outside, you
know, not terrestrial. Right? That that's what I
think that's what she's saying. And that's what
she's highlighting is it's all about, you know,
aliens, that kinda thing. And so what she's
saying is this is an example of a
drone
going up against what is something different. So
in her conversation, there's drones, like we're all
talking about, and there's a whole another element
to it. Certainly possible.
The point here is that she's highlighting this
interesting video
where you see one of these fly up
to it right there. You can see the
little tiny dot right there. Wait a while.
You see it.
And then it flies over to it and
gets shot down or something.
There it is.
Now, again, even that would be an assumption.
Right? It very well could be that they're
still in this close proximity, and that was
something that it dropped. But I would agree.
It's interesting. Like, they seem to be getting
close and something happened. Like, it's again, it's
very possible. It just even putting aside the
possibility of some for alien entity
that this is something that is alien to
the concept. Like, this is a foreign
entity from with from the United for rather
from the world
that the US is engaging with. And for
whatever reason, they don't want you to see
that or know that's what's going on. So
all sort of possibilities. And it is very
dangerous for them to continue to allow this
to be like, that's one of the biggest
points for me is usually what you get
is a blackout
and then people like us trying to show
you what you're not seeing and then just
ignoring and denying it. Right? In this case,
you get the overfocus.
You get the hype from everybody, especially the
corporate mainstream alternative media. And then them pointing
to it and giving you these weird middle
ground, like, not answer answers.
To me, there's just no way that lines
up with them hoping you don't look at
it. That is them pretending don't look at
it when they know you'll want to look
at it. See? And that and again, today,
that seems to be an easy way to
trick people.
So I'll include an article from, Matt Ehret,
which by the way, tomorrow I have a
great article series. I'm gonna start with part
1 that he put out about this exact
about the UFO psyop discussion.
This one was from September 5th, 2023.
H g Wells predicted programming revolution, UFOs drug
and the great reset. Check it out. It's
a very interesting article. I'll also include an
interview I have with Garland Nixon back on
the February 13th, 2023. False flag, psyops, and
UFOs. Oh my.
Now here's an interesting overlap to this.
And this comes from the more of the,
alien kind of adjacent conversation. Truth poll says
this is something I would say
is close to biblical Ezekiel Ezekiel's wheel.
Within a wheel wrote a wheel within a
wheel rotating on its axis. Full of eyes.
Optics like lights. This ain't no drone.
Now again, if that's even real,
which is a big if, it does look
very strange.
But I I mean, for I mean, I've
seen little, things you can buy at Walmart
that look just like that at night.
Now, maybe maybe that looks like a bigger
thing but it's not. Or maybe he doesn't
realize that it's smaller than he thinks it
is. You know, the per per perspective, especially
at night is difficult.
I'm just trying to throw out all certain
sorts of possibilities. My point is you all
seen these things. These little balls you can
buy that float. I mean, there's pop up
ads for it on Twitter. So it's certainly
possible that this could be something not like
that crazy.
But what I find interesting is this religious
connection.
Now, who right now is really pushing this
whole prophetic religious
end times conversation?
Worth pointing out. So he's highlighting this, and
what's funny is he says that, and then
down here it says, this was allegedly taken
over New Mexico. It's like, well, maybe put
that in the original tweet. But you know
why you don't? Because you want more reach.
But this one, Will Donahue, pointed something completely
different. Making the same point, which tells me
something.
I'm not saying this is, what is it?
Ophonim?
But it sure as s h I t
moves and looks like the description in Ezekiel,
which is the same reference.
So very interesting. But to me, that looks
very fake, to be honest. But either way,
the point is you're getting this we and
you'll find us. Just search for Ezekiel. You're
gonna find a lot of people pointing that
out.
Doesn't have to mean anything, but it's another
data point that seems to align with where
I feel this seems to be coming from.
Now Alexandros Marinos makes a good point, rather
citing somebody else. Best explanation for the drone
chaos I've seen yet. He says, what we
need to focus on during this,
who is receiving a pardon? We already know
that. Who is risk getting immunity?
What bills are being quietly amended and passed
by congress
as we look into the skies?
Now it doesn't even mean that that's exactly
what he listed, but the point is as
we focus on this clear cat toy distraction
story even if real,
something else is happening as always. Now to
be clear when I say that, even though
I said that it's possibly real, it even
real things can be used to just, you
know,
over focus your attention like the like the
balloon story. There were clearly balloons in the
sky, and everybody got super worked up, and
everyone's focusing and theorizing. Meanwhile oh, and at
the time, we highlighted there was a bunch
of stuff going on that the partisan conversation
was completely
oblivious
to. Now, one of the points that he
highlights is about legislation passing.
Well, I figured it was relevant as a
good segue into the conversation of Israel to
highlight one of the major things that just
happened.
Or rather that happened in the house that's
about to potentially, I argue very clearly going
to pass the Senate,
at least in the context of funding for
Israel. They made nitpick about other things that
they've, you know,
support for one thing or the other, but
what will never seem to be debate debated
is the ongoing growing funding for Israel at
your expense.
So what this is is a post from
APAC that was deleted
even though they did leave it up on
Instagram
and Facebook.
On Twitter, they did delete it. And here's
the you can see that this there's no
this week, the house passed the bill. It's
not there.
And here's the actual post. This week, the
house passed a bill with major US Israel
provisions.
Over 6 over overall, the bill includes more
than $627,000,000
in authorizations for critical US Israel programs.
So it passed the house.
So and probably right now, while we're all
pointing to the sky, it's probably gonna fly
by the senate. Or the UAE, the drone
legislation
that will restrict your rights, your ability to
do that, or increase your surveillance,
as we're all pointing at things we can't
explain, or listen to senators scream about things
we can't talk, you know, things we can't
prove.
Seems pretty interesting. Right? So here's this clip
again. I know you just saw it yesterday,
but it's worth watching. Because the point is,
over half a $1,000,000,000
just to arm Israel as they commit genocide.
Is that something Americans want? Pretty sure that's
not America first. You realize how much half
a $1,000,000,000 can help people in this country?
Now you maybe you could argue with something
going around the world that helps people that
need it more, but that's not Israel. That
is not arming their actions against foreign countries
at your expense. That's not what that means.
I argue that most conservatives would
be very upset about that if they were
being confronted with this story, which it seems
that most of them aren't talking about.
The reality of spending that much money to
dump weapons in the hands of Israel and
help them develop more weapons to continue using
against children in Gaza.
Mark my words, that's part of this.
Whether that's connected to this story or not,
this legislation
is a big deal. And it always is,
but right now more than ever because of
what we can see happening.
And it across the board, your government seems
to be in unison supporting the ongoing discussion
or rather the ongoing funding of a genocide.
And as usual, APAC just can't help but
brag about how much they can control your
government.
With the Middle East rapidly changing and Israel
fighting on multiple fronts,
Congress is taking important action
to advance policies that will help keep our
ally safe.
This week, the house passed the National Defense
Authorization Act, the major annual defense bill that
authorizes the Pentagon's budget.
APAC worked throughout the year to ensure vital
US Israel defense programs were included in the
bill, and I'm proud to report
that all of our key priorities are in
this legislation.
The bill authorizes
$500,000,000
for missile defense programs like Iron Dome, David
Sling, and Arrow,
which have saved countless lives this year by
intercepting
thousands of rockets over Israel's skies. It increased
authorizations
to $80,000,000
for technologies to detect and destroy terror tunnels
and over $47,000,000
for the United States and Israel to cooperate
on emerging threats.
This bill also authorizes numerous other programs that
will help keep Americans and Israelis safer,
like joint military exercises,
cooperation on space and satellite security,
efforts to counter Iranian backed terrorist groups, and
increase partnerships with other Middle East allies.
Now that it's passed the house, the senate
will take up the bill where we expect
a vote in the coming days, after which
it will be sent to the president's desk
to be signed into law.
America's support for Israel's security
is as important as ever.
And with your help,
congress is delivering results that will save lives
and ensure Israel has the resources
it needs to protect its families.
Thank you.
Well, Iranian backed proxies, well, I'm pretty sure
even again,
what they claim those are are not actually
what those are. These are simply elements that
are allied with Iran, but
pretty sure that it's not Hezbollah that's occupying,
committing genocide in multiple countries. I'm pretty sure
it's not Hamas, even though you fund them
as well, that is committing genocide in multiple
countries, who are breaking the law around the
world, who are whose leader is about to
go to prison for 4 different indictments. Like,
I'm pretty sure that's not the reality of,
the Houthis, for example, who are one of
the few groups out there that are actively
fighting against what's going on,
but that's who they're pointing at. And that's
what they're telling you. You just funded with
your tax dollars Israel's efforts to keep murdering
these people while they commit genocide around the
world.
That's pretty upsetting.
So
ask yourself whether that might be part of
what is being rolled out as we're all
distracted.
Now talking about Israel,
in general, specifically around Gaza, or actually this
first point to Lebanon,
I wanna make sure we don't lose sight
of what's going on in the world.
Dan Cohen highlights 3 days after October 7th,
an Israeli
who was involved with the Gilad, Shalit
negotiations
stated that, quote, the state of Israel has
implemented the Hannibal directive on the whole of
the Gaza Strip. Now Dan has done amazing
work on this conversation.
Many of us using work like his and
and and electronic and
people like Max Blumenthal have very clearly broken
down the
unquestionable
reality that they not only chose
to kill their own people
for a lot of reasons you could get
into, but the the point is that they
did so and that they clearly ordered the
Hannibal directive.
Not just that they did what ended up
resembling that, but officially ordered the Hannibal directive.
If you don't remember what that means, it
means that they are are willing to kill
their own people so they can't be used
against them.
It's very real, very documented, and even the
Israeli media in fact, it was Horetz and
others that actually broke that story.
Well, beyond the undeniable reality that we were
all pointing to it. They came out and
broke the story that it was provably ordered
from the higher brass.
So the point
is that we know that's reality.
Now he goes on to say, it's not
a secret even in Israel that the captives
are targets.
Here is what is being reported.
All all Kassim brigades in in Lebanon announced
that Israel
bombed a building where they had intel on
their hostages being kept.
After the first bombing, they returned to bomb
again,
ensuring that their hostages would be killed. Literally,
they're murdering their own people because at this
point, they're a political liability. And that's been
shown clearly,
They go on and say, since they tend
to come out knowing too much about their
own government and military,
as well as discovering the humanity of the
people, they've been told all their lies were
out to kill them.
It's truth.
And that's not my opinion. You can look
at all the different examples of pretty much
every single hostage, save for the ones that
weirdly a few months after being out, suddenly
start telling you another story
that to a t.
95% of them have held their story that
they were treated well,
that they and to be clear, all of
them come out saying that.
A few of them have weirdly completely changed
their stories. I mean, like, diametrically
opposite story.
But my point was that most of them
are still telling they treated me kindly. They
didn't hurt me. You know, the point is
that it was the opposite of what we
were told.
Now it's very clear to see what's going
on in Israeli actual torture prisons. Like, that's
not a hyperbolistic hyperbolic statement. We can prove
that they're raping and torturing them according to
every international body you can point to at
this point. But realizing that they are choosing
to target where these people are held.
Now, actually, you know what? I think I
now that I'm thinking about this, I feel
like I assumed this was,
in Lebanon.
Oh, you know what? Okay. That's that's I'm
how do I make that mistake? So I
guess what I was thinking what just skip
the I made a mistake in this case.
I thought this was referencing the groups in
Lebanon. I was wrong. I'm trying to remember
what the group was. Anyway, the point is
mistake. So here, this is in Gaza. So
it even makes it better because what we're
gonna get into is rest on Gaza.
Either way, the point is we know this
is happening in in all of these locations.
But the reason this made sense to me
is we're talking about hostages. Right? And so
that's clearly happening in Gaza.
Nonetheless, the points are the same. They're telling
you, as we've proven many times, as hostages
who have come out of Gaza have told
us, they watched people get killed by IDF
bombs.
The Bebas father,
which they still continue to use the children's
names knowing that they killed them, has said
on air that they watched them get killed
by IDF bombs.
And to this very day, the Israeli government
keeps using the names and pictures of those
children even though they know what happened because
it was very publicized and they keep denying
it.
As Craig Murray points out, the rate at
which Israel is killing in Gaza has not
slowed.
And, incredibly, the proportion killed who are children
has actually increased
from 42%
overall to 48%
last month.
Whatever you wanna make of that, the reality
is Israel is only getting more emboldened.
And I think it was clear indications to
take from that, but it's all these things
are very contentious today. The reality is that
whatever it is, Israel is continuing
to go harder at all of the things
we can see are illegal
that reveal what they really are. And that's
a scary thing to think about.
Here, Sarah Abdallah points out a very heartbreaking
story.
I mean, I I gotta be clear. If
this isn't necessarily graphic, but this is this
is a heart wrenching image that you're gonna
see. So if you don't wanna see this,
if you're in a moment where you don't
wanna potentially be upset, maybe you shouldn't watch
this. It's very quick.
6 year old child lost both of his
legs by Israeli bombs.
Here he is today in Gaza, as she
writes home to the largest number of amputee
children in modern history.
This is what the western regime calls self
defense.
Now for the podcast, I just didn't wanna
read off, you you know, just what for
2 point what's interesting first of all is
that all these all these saying is, you
know,
how you know,
what was which I always find interesting from
the from in any position of faith in
the world,
it's very stands out to me how much
from a whether Palestinian or what you know,
just a Muslim faith position. But I think
largely I see mostly Palestinians is like, imagine
being in the midst of something like that.
Not even just the child. Just what's your
the world you're in the the your entire
civil civilization.
It's dirt. It's gone.
And your and your statements are god is
great. And and, you know, it's like it
shows you that this this very powerful belief
in in the fact that there's something bigger
than us. As he says praise you know,
this is all and that we should thank
god every day and praise god every day.
And the blessings we have, he's saying this
while I mean, because the point is he's
saying this is horrifying. Look at what they're
doing to these children. Look at the reality
we're living in. But then he my point
is then he ends with this state, which
is very common for Palestinian to say that,
and I think that's inspiring.
Because, see, I mean, I can't even imagine
trying to, you know, thank
be thankful for what you have in the
middle of such horror,
but good on him for doing so. The
second point is without hearing the words, I
find it kind of disgusting that what he's
saying such beautiful things that people in this
country would hear that and think terrorism. That
is the testament to the propaganda
that comes from your government, both sides of
it.
And this is what they're creating.
Matt Gaetz
says it's so sad what's happened to Ireland.
Now this is not the point. This is
what I wrote after, but he goes, let
it be a lesson. Unchecked immigration ruins nations,
which, of course, it's incredible to say that
about even or, like,
ask Claire and others from Ireland what's causing
that. It's the same point.
They argue it's somehow they're you know, the
point is that this is a manufactured problem
that the US and Israel and the rest
are very clearly a part of. Either way,
it says Israel will close its embassy in
Ireland due to extreme anti Israel policies. You
mean holding you accountable for your genocide?
What a racist.
It's crazy. And that's what he's saying is
somehow unchecked in immigration has caused them to
to what? Hate Israel? Like, you guys are
so lost.
That's the best he can do is suggest
that somehow because Muslims have invaded Ireland that
now they hate Israel. Like, you guys are
gross. In every possible way, you are the
worst things I can see in this conversation
today.
And what's interesting is that what Ira would
have been doing is having a very clear
stance to push back against the complete impunity
that they're giving Israel.
But Matt Gaetz is completely a part of
that. But I simply said, maybe it's because,
as this Jewish Jewish doctor points out from
his time in Gaza, that the IDF is
targeting almost exclusively children. And then what do
you know? They put the graphic warning on
like they do literally every time. And I
followed up by saying,
will you put a graphic warning on this
image, Twitter, of a child in Gaza shot
in the head by the IDF?
Or just the video above that's not graphic
at all, where a Jewish doctor simply describes
how the IDF is killing almost exclusively children?
Oh, but you don't.
Funny how that works, how you can have
something that is at least somewhat more graphic,
but nothing weird there. But you can have
a doctor outlining things in just plain terms,
nothing graphic that would be you get the
point. I make it every time. I think
it's very obvious how this video in particular
is
problematic
for people controlling this conversation. Because he's a
Jewish doctor, and he makes this profoundly clear.
And I played it many times. I'll play
it again.
Because we're gonna talk about what's going on
in Gaza right now, specifically about children, while
Matt Gaetz wants to deflect and act like
somehow you're the problem by calling out a
genocide.
When were you in Gaza?
End of April for the 1st couple weeks,
and then there's sniper bullets. I have children
that were shot twice. Wait. You're saying that
children in Gaza are being shot by snipers?
Definitively.
I have 2 children that I have photographs
of that were shot so perfectly in the
chest I couldn't put my stethoscope over their
heart more accurately
and directly on the side of the head
in the same child. No toddler gets shot
twice by mistake by the world's best sniper,
and they're dead center shots.
In fact, more than 20 doctors recently in
Gaza
also told Sunday morning about gunshot wounds to
children.
1 American doctor told us he even reviewed
CT scans to confirm what he saw because
he, quote, didn't believe that this many children
could be admitted to a single hospital
with gunshot wounds to the head.
Some shootings
have been captured on video.
So of all the disaster zones you've seen,
how does Gaza compare?
All of the dis disasters I've seen combined
combined. 40 mission trips, 30 years,
ground 0,
earthquakes.
All of that combined
doesn't equal
the level of carnage
that I saw against civilians
in just my 1st week in Gaza.
And when you say civilians,
is it mostly children?
Almost exclusively children.
I've never seen that before.
Never seen that. I've seen more
incinerated children than I've ever seen in my
entire life combined. I've seen more shredded children
in just the 1st week. Shredded? Shredded. What
do you mean? Missing body parts, being crushed
by buildings, the greatest majority,
or bomb explosions,
the next greatest majority. We've taken shrapnel as
big as my thumb out of 8 year
olds.
The UN reports that to date, more than
80% of Gaza's population has been displaced.
And the
Now here
is the example again.
This is being shared by Mohammed Safa, a
1 month old baby who was shot in
the head by an Israeli sniper in Gaza
has survived. Thank god. I see no one
sharing.
If he were dead, everyone would share.
Sad. The point is, guys, this is everywhere
you look.
And, of course,
they're trying to suppress that. And I'll include
the thread, by the way, of all these
many, many doctors. Weirdly enough, by the way,
none of which below seem to have graphic
warning labels despite being far more graphic and
plenty of examples. But just same point as
always, there's very obvious censorship on this platform.
Forgot to save that one for you.
Now next is the same conversation. Here is
The Guardian. Now this is from December 11th
this year.
Death feels imminent
for 96%
of children in Gaza.
96%.
Death feels imminent for 96%
of them.
And realize that the vast majority, well over
70% of what has been focused on have
been children and women and children.
Tiberias says f Israel and f the United
States, Sitting behind computer screens targeting a 1000000
children with the world's most advanced weaponry like
absolute cowards.
Dan Cohen highlights another thing for another
coverage of this story.
Mossab Abu Tohar, breaking news. 6 people got
killed in an airstrike in an apartment complex
in Gaza City. These 2 are kids. This
is from the 11th. He says, this is
the 4 100 and 33rd
consecutive day of watching Israel exterminate Palestinian children.
If we stop talking about the genocide, that
means Israel has won the information war. The
resistance hasn't given up, and we shouldn't either.
Tiberias again highlights a graphic. This is from,
Gaza based NGO supported by the World Child
Alliance.
Gaza cycle oh, excuse me. Genocide psychological impact
on children in Gaza. 96%
fear imminent death. 92%
not accepting of reality.
79% suffer from nightmares. 73%
display aggressive behavior. These children will never be
the same as they might have been before
this. There's no way around that. They're psychologically
broken.
You go through something like this as child
that can't process what you're looking at, guys.
This is what happens. It's abuse at the
most obvious form. I mean, I mean, really,
at the lowest level of what we're talking
about, but it's definitely abuse on top of
everything else. He says, what the west has
done in the to the children in Gaza
cannot be denied, overlooked, forgotten, or resigned to
the history books. There must be consequences. There
must be justice.
Oh, unless I forget, here's a child who
also has an American passport. So I think
it's very, very interesting why people like Steph
st Stefanik
or Tom Cotton or Brian Mast
or plenty of others continue to harp about
the only specifically Israeli Americans that we should
care about they claim are still being held
hostage, who have probably been killed by Israel
by now.
The problem is that this is also I
shouldn't say problem, but the important point is
this is also a Palestinian American. Whereas, not
that it should matter anymore, there are simply
just Americans as NPR reported and plenty of
others, over 600 of them trapped in Gaza
when this started.
I just think it's important to continually reiterate
that your congresspeople
do not care about Americans, but go out
of their way to fight for an Israeli
as soon as they're even purse proposed to
be a threat.
Ryan Ross Beharani says, never forget this. Biden
funded an Israeli bomb to the home of
an American child.
He's holding up his passport.
And this is a very widely covered story
at the time. I covered this myself.
Robert in Lokesh points out, and he's working
on an article for TLAB right now, in
the last 2 months, Israel has killed at
least 4,000 civilians in northern Gaza alone.
The real toll is much higher. Bodies are
left in the unreachable streets, and many are
missing under rubble. Israel pulverized
what was left of the buildings there too.
The media ignored this.
Now here's Stephanie,
Elise Stefanik.
4 this is from yesterday. 400 and day
434,
She she writes. It has been 434 days,
she says, since Hamas terrorists abducted innocent civilians
during the barbaric October 7th attack in Israel.
There are a 100 still being held hostage
in Gaza, including 7 Americans. See my point?
What about the 600 that are is Palestinian
Americans? What about the many that are just
Americans, Stefanik? Funny how as an American in
quotes, a mere rather an American representative in
quotes,
you only seem to care about ones with
an Israeli partner name. Why is that?
It's obvious.
I've never once seen her acknowledge or any
of them for that matter, the Americans that
are being hurt in Gaza. And right in
the beginning, there were three stories of American
families or American individuals who were there with
their family, who were from the United States,
who were saying, I feel like I've been
abandoned.
No one's helping my family.
Nobody cared, guys, because they were so terrified
of highlighting what was going on. And now
they're screeching about people that were
IDF members that were taken because they were
murdering people as well
or occupying illegal territory.
And those are the ones she cares about.
Why? Because somebody's paying her too.
And and then APAC tracker writes day 32.
It's been 32 days since Stefanik has posted
about has posted about anything but Israel. That's
a weird way to write that. His point
is that she's posted only about Israel. And
there's a watch it. He scrolls through it
all. Think about that for a second. Do
you have an American politician who for 32
days straight has only posted about Israel?
Speaks for itself.
And she's made almost $1,000,000
because of it.
And here's somebody else responding to the same
point.
And he says, you know, date 3 40
or 4 34.
430 434 days since the genocide in Gaza
began.
Over 44,000 lives lost, including Americans, which she
doesn't want to acknowledge. More than 10,000 bodies
still buried beneath the rubble. Over a 106,000
wounded,
70% of the women and children. Over 10,000
Palestinians held as hostage. Their suffering ignored. This
violence must end. This genocide must stop now.
All hostages must be freed. Justice is long
overdue. ICJ and ICC, it's time to act.
Shame on those who will turn a blind
eye like Stefanik.
This is a stain on the soul of
humanity, a wound that will never heal.
And this is the kind of thing that
is staining the soul of humanity, guys. These
are not good people.
They know what they're doing.
They're happily ignoring, almost gleefully in some cases,
what was happening. When they get confronted in
the in the halls of Congress, they they
laugh and shout and shout. It's disgusting.
They know what they're doing.
Now here is what Stefanik is ignoring.
Palestinians record their own genocide while western leaders
deny that it's even happening.
They tell you not to believe your own
eyes, to believe the state of burning people
alive.
Yeah. 30 or, you know, 400, so many
I mean, whatever. The point
is that what you're staring at,
there's no
Hamas tunnels. There's no human shields. But guess
what? They're not even saying that anymore.
They're just going, okay. You guys are focused
over there. Who cares about narratives then? If
you're not even asking what justifies the murder
of all these innocent people, then I'm just
gonna pretend it didn't happen. Which is what
they've been doing for 40 or for their
entire existence.
So think about that as we're watching them
just continue to bomb and kill 4,000 civilians
within 48 hours in Gaza, and no one's
even bringing it up outside of independent media.
There's not even an excuse. There's not even
a narrative around it anymore.
Well, as Scott Horton points out, conservative American
Zionists,
just imagine that this little girl, bloody face
being carried away from an Israeli bomb, just
imagine that she's someone's pet squirrel.
You'd be mad as hell at Joe Biden
then, wouldn't you?
Now there's a fair point to be made
about why any like, why the story mattered,
obviously. But he makes an excellent point. Like
with the drone story,
let's have some some balance here. Let's recognize
what matters and what's going on when we
can prove what is important.
Now the story around what happened to school,
there was an important story to make there
about freedom, about invasive
about the actions of a government. But the
bottom line
is the absolute
lack of concern by a lot of them
for what is being done to these people
in your name, in your tax dollars, which
is being is clearly supported by the incoming
administration.
Decentral News points out.
And this Eunice Tarawi do an amazing job
continuing to document all of these war crimes.
14 months ago, it says, we've made very
clear that we expect Israel, the state department
says this, to conduct its operations in compliance
with international law, protect civilians from harm. We'll
continue to work with them to ensure that
they meet the highest standards.
Well, here is Israel today.
They shared this, by the way, on their
own social media. And guess what it says?
Gaza, wake up, Jabaliyah.
Woah.
Yeah. Clearly all about freedom and democracy. Right?
Like, realize that's to believe refugee camp. We're
talking about the area where there are a
lot of people that they routinely bomb. His
point is he's opening fire
into an open area where there are civilians.
Now whether he hit him or not, you
can't tell in the video. The point is
that it's a crime regardless that he is
belligerently firing on an open area full of
civilians. That's why he posted it laughingly saying
wake up, Jabaliyah.
They know that they're gonna get away with
this right now. I hope they're wrong. But
sadly, it does continue to seem like they
might be right.
That we just cannot seem to highlight the
fact or rather force our power structures to
give a damn about what they're doing,
which I don't know why is not earth
shattering to anybody with a brain.
But I do know why people, even with
brains, would decide to ignore that for their
own personal interest.
Germany and the United States
supply
99%
of the weapons exported to Israel. This is
from the UN Special Rapporteur,
Ben Sall. He says they could stop this
conflict overnight
if they stop the weapons that kill the
Palestinians. And we've been pointing this out from
day 1. And so you have to acknowledge
that this is a US and German and
Israeli
genocide.
They have equal part in what has continued
to happen, especially since we've now proven that
they have people on the ground.
Ryan Raspiani makes this even more clear. One
image makes this very clear. He says, Jablia
was once home to 7 170,000 residents, now
it is devastated. Now, realize, the camp we're
talking about is still like the tent makeup.
There is still a camp where people are
trying to survive.
What he's talking about is the central place
the central place called Jabaliya. Here's what it
looked like before this.
Here's what it looks like right now.
Now, if you can't connect those dots, if
you can't have the courage to highlight that
there's no possible legal way that that is
going after tunnels and bad guys and Hamas
and human shields,
then you just don't wanna see the truth.
Which fine. Then then why are you even
here?
The reality is obvious. This is ethnic cleansing.
This is complete destruction of an entire civilization.
And you know what? They're telling you why.
They were telling you why day 1. They've
been telling you why for decades.
Oh, just have to listen.
Al Masrahi points out that they're continuing even
to this moment to displace people
inside of Gaza despite the fact that they've
already been let's be clear about this.
They have displaced every location in Gaza. They
have been playing a game where they move
them from corner to corner to corner and
bomb them in every location simultaneously,
the place they're currently at, the place they're
told to go to be safe, and on
the way.
Every time we've proven this. Corporate media has
pointed this many times. The reality is that
why now are they doing it again?
They've displaced these people into controlled areas that
they then move them again and move them
again and move them again. And every single
time, they're torturing these people. They're making, in
some cases, this multiple times a day.
Now
here is the same point. Internationally recognized war
criminals issuing evacuation orders to the remaining survivors
of their genocide.
The most documented series of state organized atrocities
in human history. This is what we get
from western culture. He says, the the the
cradle reports the Israeli military
issues a new evacuation order for Gaza
right now, threatening to bomb parts of the
area that the army has already designated as
a humanitarian safe zone. But what regardless of
the confusing nature of this, which does
give them the justification like, basically, they'll they'll
give
conflicting reports over certain days.
Acted blaming it on them, essentially.
But even then,
even if they only gave one order, we've
already proven that they deliberately
bomb the place they told them to go
to or bomb before they said the time
that they would let like, you have 2
hours, they bomb in 15 minutes.
Every single time.
But the largest simple point here is that
they've already gone over all these areas. These
this is torture. They are torturing these people,
and you can see them laughing and shooting
open and having posting their TikToks and pocking
about settlements.
These are not people at war.
These are people who are sadistically torturing entire
population.
As
from December 11, 2023,
their media told you.
Quote, the commanders say it clearly.
Anyone who walks on 2 legs and is
not a soldier dies,
period.
That's from a year ago.
The Israeli genocide forces have been creating what
they call annihilation zones. Very publicized.
This has been openly admitted on their TV
on their for 14 months.
But yet, for some reason and, again, the
real point needs to be made.
Your government sees this. They know it's happening.
They don't care. They're deliberately pretending like they
don't see it or acting like you're wrong.
Despite them openly saying it. It's like Netanyahu
and Gallant openly telling you these things, they
just go, you're you're racist or you're you're
wrong. That's fake news.
Now I call that desperation, but weirdly, it
continues to seem like nothing's changing. Now I
do think there's a level of desperation because
they haven't been at the point where it
seems that everyone's able to see it.
But I think they're waiting for the other
shoe to drop.
If it never does, this won't stop.
They know you see them.
And what they're doing in the midst of
all that is starving everybody as well. None
of these problems have gone away. Nope. People
are just
less and less covering it.
Famine is spreading in Gaza.
Gaza doesn't have enough food for the children
while the world full of food is watching
and doing nothing. Now I wanna be very
clear about this. This has only gotten dramatically
worse,
and less people are talking about it. Remember
we were talking about it right here,
where this was where we were at?
And I was saying, oh my god. Look
at it. It's only a 165. It's only
a 165 trucks a day. What we're looking
after the podcast is the UN breakdown of
the trucks coming in and out.
And the reality is before this started, as
you guys know, 500 a day including fuel
was the average, and they were already borderline
food insecure. Or rather they were food insecure,
but borderline getting into a worse situation. That
was widely reported at the time.
The moment this started,
Israel shut this down to basically 0 for
weeks,
guaranteeing a rapid surge into famine and starvation.
And then it went up a little bit
and at a peak, only ever got to
165 a day.
Down from the average 500, and they were
already food insecure. Now the reason this is
even necessary is because Israel's never allowed these
people to go back to their homes, which
was agreed upon a long time ago.
So for the argument of why they even
need to behave, that that's because of Israel.
Now what has continued
has been shocking.
With more crossings open, mind you. They've opened
more crossings, which gives the illusion of more
hap but they've restricted it even further. To
this point,
all of November,
65 a day. That's it.
Now what I know for a fact is
happening based on every report, based on having
desperate famine situations months ago, every day right
now, people are dying and no one's reporting
it. What largely because there's very little ability
to report from within Gaza because they're executing
reporters every day, which has happened again. Every
day I see a new reporter they've murdered.
That people are just dropping dead and there's
no one to report this stuff. People are
starving in real time. What what and of
course, that's what they're assuming. They're not bombed
or raped or tortured while they're there.
But you just can't ignore this stuff, guys.
It's shocking.
Under food insecurity, this this it says famine
thresholds
may have already been crossed,
or else will be in the near future.
You know why it says that? Because no
one's allowed to look at this stuff. Israel
has this blocked out. Nobody's allowed to look.
Nobody there's only times we've seen corporate media
go into look is when they're allowed to
in certain weird circumstances. And even then, they
got called out for certain things, which is
probably why they're desperately trying to stop it
now.
They're in famine, guys. 91%
of the analyzed population is projected to face
high levels of acute food insecurity
classified by the IPC.
No one cares.
Or we do, but we don't know what
to do about it.
And here is UNRWA,
Philip Lazzarini. Now, it's about a 8 60
minute clip, you can watch it for yourself.
But it simply says, the stories are absolutely
harrowing. This is CNN reporting it. We're just
eating animal fodder to keep us alive. That's
what he's talking about in regard to people
in Gaza. Now in Francesca Albany, he says
by continuing to starve Palestinians in Gaza, Israel
does deepen resentment around the world, as well
as its responsibility.
And that all that of its accomplices for
genocide.
However,
the global rise of extremism, including in liberal
democracies, just demonstrates that one does not need
to be starved to become extremist.
I mean, it's worrisome right now that we
are seemingly watching this, Not just I mean,
normalize is a word you could call it.
But I don't know how you're ever gonna
normalize what we know we're seeing. You just
become desensitized to it. Right? But what she's
talking about is a time where we're literally
slowly getting to a point to where, well,
you know, Hayat Zir al Sham, you know,
their facade was worse and, like, open terrorists
are taking power. Israel was literally committing genocide
and we're I just all goose stepping forward.
I'm telling you, you know my thought on
it. It is because of the partisanship. I'm
telling you. That's why in this country, we
are unable to make that change.
Eyes on Palestine adds to the famine point
and simply shows that several Palestinians in Gaza
and we just we just reported by the
way that people were, I think, deliberately given
spoiled food, and they ate it anyway because
they're desperately starving. And many of them, I
think 50 plus people, got sick while they're
starving to death. And then maybe got bombed
later. You know, this is the world they're
living in. The point is on top of
that, several Palestinians and Gaza were poisoned after
consuming a toxic substance
left by Israeli forces,
making
mistaking it for cheese. So when we get
into the conversation of testing new weapons and
torturing people, there's a lot going on that
we don't know about. And I am absolutely
convinced that what they're doing is experimentation in
a lot of different ways, which by the
way has been covered pretty extensively over the
years that they've been doing to Gaza for
a long time.
So now they're I mean, we saw the
examples of putting out little cans that look
like food that are bombs that children fall
for, and they've been opening them and exploding
themselves.
There's literally no explanation other than they do
that to kill children, guys. That's what they're
doing.
In this case, they're setting out food around
starving people that's not food. It's actually poison.
Democracy.
General it says the director general
of the Ministry of Health in Gaza stated
that on November 27th,
the occupation deliberately places the substance near bottles
of water and drinks in a region suffering
from hunger. Residents unaware of its nature consumed
it, raising urgent concerns about the use of
such materials as potential weapons against civilians.
And he goes on to explain and give
you more breakdown of this, but it's not
surprising at all.
Mari Baghouti points out that the Palestinian authority
is now stepping up, which by the way,
you shouldn't be surprised about if you've watched
this platform and executing people in West Bank.
Now the point is that Robert's been telling
you this a long time. This is from
July 19, 2023, but he's written about it
many times in this platform. This one just
simply says, Israel's attack on Jenin failed.
So Tel Aviv uses the Palestinian authority to
do its dirty work. The PA is not
a friend of Palestine. It's the illusion they
use to argue Palestinians are represented when it's
just
a pit, it's a,
enforcer for Israel, essentially.
So it doesn't have to be looking like
it's doing all the work and ultimately risking
its people. And, you know, it's very clear.
Read the article. He does a good job
explaining it. She writes, the situation is horrifying.
The Palestinian authority has cut off electricity from
Jenin refugee camp, and a child has been
shot moments ago. His name is Mohammed Mary.
According to his family, he's in surgery, but
his fate remains unknown.
The PA is targeting resistance groups at the
behest of Israel, and in the process, killing
civilians, killing children.
Now remember, they're the ones already pretending like
that somehow might be a good solution for
people taking control after they've it's
they have it all sewed up, they think.
Hopefully, they're wrong.
Dan Cohen points out,
never forget
how they lied
about October 7th to incite genocide against Gaza.
And he includes one of his posts from
November 10, 2023.
Watch, quote, 40 beheaded babies,
the lie that kicked off Israel's genocide of
Gaza. We can't ever forget how obvious that
was and how everybody,
partisan media,
left, right corporate media,
every part of our government. I mean, lockstep,
rolled out the narrative that they beheaded children,
children on clothes lines, children in an oven,
all stomach cut open. Every one of those
were lies, without question, verified by Israeli media
itself.
Never forget that, guys, because it seems that
I mean, the point is, if it's clear
that they don't care about obvious genocide being
proven, then they knew these were lies too.
They didn't care. We just need to begin
to see what this truly shows us about
what world we live in.
We are not run by people that care
about these things. They pretend to because they
think they know we do.
Now even in Israeli media, but in this
case, BBC, but this is a very prominent
conversation,
and the Israeli media is next. Netanyahu aid
is investigated over 7 October 7th document changes.
This is from November last month.
The they're basically arguing they're hiding information about
what they knew. Here's more more specific from
Times of Israel.
Lapid says, point blank,
Netanyahu knew for months
before October 7th that a violent eruption was
looming.
So I have one point to make about
that if you think that's the case, which
seems like a good and one of the
very clear possibilities,
is that it makes sense to argue that
Netanyahu wouldn't have expected what actually happened. More
so that he sort of lost control of
the event and then just ordered Hannibal directive
and all it all went sideways. Right? Because
I think he recognized he was losing control.
And maybe that's because of other groups other
than Hamas that came through, because that's what
happened too. But, I mean, who knows? The
point is,
it wouldn't make sense to me the way
that went down
that that I mean, it's certainly possible. These
people are pretty disgusting. But, ultimately, they would
let that was what they would lay out
as the plan. But, ultimately, that they did
want them to take advantage of something so
they could then point to that action to
justify what they're doing now.
But something went awry. Whether there's elements of
Hamas that weren't along with their plan or
other maybe the Palestinian Islam which Jihad came
in and ruined their plans. The point is
that something went
awry. It seems that way. And they shut
it down, ordered a handle directive, and started
killing everybody in sight. And that then just
went full blow with the narrative anyway. Went
after Hamas, and it didn't work for a
second. But now even they're pointing out that
he knew it was coming. So you have
to consider that they let it happen for
some reason, or some other overlapping narrative. But
you can't keep pretending like the narrative that
the US western media is pushing is the
truth. When every single element is telling you
the otherwise. And by the way, proving it.
The evidence is so overwhelmingly clear going back
to the days following October 7th. I mean,
I've almost seen never even COVID 19, I
believe this story rivals how ridiculously obvious it
is.
COVID 19, as much as it still gets
pushed back, was very, very clear, I think,
for a while, but their own data showing
it was deadly.
In this case, I mean, it's I think
it is I think it takes the cake.
Now you forget
why it's the clear that they would lie
and cover these things up, even hurt their
own people. Refresh yourself on what Zionism is.
Zachary Foster with a PhD in Palestinian history
from Princeton breaks down 8 different threads. He
put them all together in one long master
thread. So good on him. He's doing great
work. Eight threads on Zionism.
1, brief history of Zionism. 2, Zionism and
colonialism.
3, Zionism and racism. 4, Zionism rejected
rejected,
rescuing Jews from persecution.
Number 5,
doing Zionism quietly. Number 6, anti semitic Zionists.
Number 7, Zionist staging anti Semitic incidents. And
number 8, Jewish rejection of Zionism.
Very important. Does a great job on this.
You can see they're very extensive too, each
one of these.
Now lastly, before we go into supports about
Syria some parts about Syria, Howard Beckett points
out,
Francesca Albanese at the UN had some pretty
strong words to say about basically calling out
everybody in the room for why they continue
to sell narratives like 40 Beheaded Babies. And
what we're gonna talk about is how it's
very clear, how people clear everyone sees this.
And that everywhere in the world,
you have power structures that are choosing to
ignore this or you're choosing to acknowledge it.
And that's the line we have to recognize.
And here's what she's call he's calling out
people in the UN.
Shocked. I always experience a sense of shock
and delusion when I come to this room.
And because many of you recited the same
script that you had in front of yourself
last year. Of course, we condemn Hamas attack.
Of course, we express solidarity with the with
the Israeli victims. Of course, we demand
the, the release of the hostages,
both the the Israelis and the Palestinians. But
is it possible that after 42,000
people killed,
you cannot
empathize with the Palestinians? You, those of you
who have not uttered a word about what
is happening in Gaza demonstrate
that empathy has evaporated from this room, and
empathy is the glue
that makes us stand united
as humanity.
Now as well as the world, it's important
to highlight that Israel is very self aware
that we see them.
Here are some examples. Max Blumenthal points out
another tacit confession, the IDF is conducting the
holocaust of our time.
The Henry Job Foundation has really shaken the
Zionist
regime genocide regime.
Masat commentary puts this out. It says, please
share. 2 soldiers of the IDF, do not
post a picture of yourself in the battlefields
of Gaza or anywhere else. And they're doing
it anyway because they're a bunch of children.
Do not even post all at all on
social media. They're not listening.
There's a group that their job is to
identify IDF soldiers
and send the information to countries that you
may be visiting at some point or maybe
you're from because many of them are not
from Israel. And you may be arrested.
Your vacation will turn into a nightmare.
So even if you wanna argue that they
are of the mind that you're unjustly being
accused, they're very aware that the world sees
them as genociders. I think clearly they know
what they're doing. The point is, don't do
that because you're gonna go to jail. They
know.
And I think what's interesting
is, what's the point? It was,
oh, the group. So he's arguing that this
is more so this group, which I guarantee
is playing a role in that. But I
I actually think more so that people like
Eunice Raui, who are just,
I mean, very clearly on their trail. And
even as as the international community has been
using his post to to land their case
out for genocide. Because he's not just showing
you the video. He's literally tracing it back
to like, because it's on their accounts. He'd
get an information. He's attacking it to where
they are. He's proving what group they're in.
I mean, he's nailing it to the wall,
and that's why they're doing that. They're worried
they're gonna go to jail. Good. On top
of that, Craig Murray points out, Starmer in
the UK gave, quote, special immunity
to the chief of staff of an army
committing genocide
and invading 3 nations.
So that he could come and discuss UK
help to Israel
to continue genocide.
The point, if they did not know that
he was guilty, they would not have needed
to give immunity, guys.
Now, again, you could argue that Dave Starmer
just disagrees That they're not genocidal. But that's
not how that works. Right? I mean, obviously,
they can have their own opinion. But in
the context of international law,
they can choose to
decouple themselves from the ICC and the ICJ.
That would be one of the moves, possible.
They won't do that because that would remove
their position. The point is that you are
part of that group and you've signed on
to acknowledge how that works, which is when
these things happen, then you're obligated to take
effect and arrest them when they come through
your area.
Either way, you could argue that he doesn't
think they're actually guilty. But he knows that
we all do think that. That's why he
had to do that.
I don't think that could be any more
clear.
So let's talk about Syria.
There's a lot to get into that I
don't think should take us that long. I
wanna really just want to reiterate some of
the points.
Let me reroute that video. There we go.
Some, some of these points that we talked
about during my interview with Vanessa.
Let me just grab the screen share here
for the Syrian parts. Here we go.
So
we I have really 2 important interviews with
Vanessa recently, and I hope you'll check it
out. First was on December 1st.
The truth about what's happening in Syria, which
had a lot of good important information that
I think is still relevant to
the the base of this story,
which has very clearly because at this time,
in this in this conversation, we were still
wondering whether this was really happening, which was
a fair thing to argue. Because at first,
it really was a psychological arm of this
whole thing. There were real people. There were
real elements. But as Vanessa proved in real
time, there was entire things that were being
framed on Twitter by largely mainstream alternative media
elements
that were completely false.
Some of which interestingly,
actually later came to pass, which shows me
something. Right? That there's more overlapping influence coming
from elements like Israel, United States, and groups
involved in what's happening there. Either way,
the point was that they it ended up
becoming very real. Right?
But at the time,
there was an element of this that was
using misinformation
and shock value, you know, all sorts of
stuff. Oops. I just ruined that. Yeah. Dang
it.
There we go. But then we followed up
on
the 13th December, entitled the US and Israeli
backed regime change in Syria and its Zionist
beneficiary.
And, you know, it's it's it's even just
as people acknowledge in the chat, like, it's
starting out, like, it's it's hard. Vanessa seems
very, you know, it's you could see this
is drained on her. Which I mean, I
can't even imagine what it must be like
for somebody that's been fighting for the cause
of what she believes in and having why
watch these
clearly corrupt elements just roll in and destroy
everything. But, of course, the other elements too
is that what actually happened. I can see
that it's weighing on a lot of people.
You know, what happened with Assad? What happened
with Russia? We still don't seem to know.
And I'll make good points about that in
a second. But this conversation is important because
we break down what we can prove at
the time. And right about now, it still
kinda seems to be mostly what we can
prove from this art from this discussion.
Going through some of these things that they're
important, here's what Vanessa said on, 14th.
The collective west punished the Syrian people for
14 years with terrorist invasion,
barbaric sanctions, and occupation of Syrian essential energy
resources. They're right there alone. It's always the
same in every conversation.
Like, with Venezuela, like, with even Bolivia with
the same case, or or, what's a better
example? Like, Syria is still ongoing, Iran, right,
in a lot of ways. That they destroy
in every way they can
the ability for the country to succeed, and
then turn around and claim it's their fault
for why that's happening.
Even though it's so transparent,
but seemingly everything else is the same way
right now. They don't even care if we
see it. All we need is their screamers
to say the same thing.
And And it says the Syrian people were
deliberately deprived of electricity, fuel, water, food, livelihood,
which by the way, I think I even
put next.
No. Not yet, I guess. It's in here
somewhere. The point is that they deprive them
of all these things while Assad was in
power. You know, a a whatever you wanna
protect. Whether you think he's elected or you
think he's some dictator, which I I just
don't think is the reality of what you
can see in his history despite lies they've
tried to force. Either way,
the point is that they put in place
after he's gone
a group that they actually have registered as
a terrorist organization, who is
a very clear
ISIS Al Qaeda element.
And then immediately, they start sending food and
water, and it that's what happened.
Why?
Because they clearly support what's happening, guys. There's
no way around it. These are terrorists, and
they put them there, and they want that.
What's very clear to prove is that they
did not care whether Syrians suffered as long
until they got what they wanted. These are
not good people.
Refugees were accepted with and to be clear,
they're giving them things they needed this case,
at least in some reality. They're giving them
but I can guarantee that's being centrally controlled
by the elements they put in power, which
is usually how that works, and then probably
getting all sorts of sexual manipulation and and
bribery and to get food. It's how that
works.
But
they're still giving food to people. My point
is that in many cases, that is just
to make it seem like now it's gonna
be better. Right? Which we saw in Libya
and places where people going, yay. Life is
gonna be better because they US took over
and then immediately have found themselves in an
open slate market. And now, many years later,
in Iraq and otherwise, they have many videos
where they go, I wish I would have
seen what happened.
It we but one of the quotes was
in the context of,
Saddam, I think it was, which ultimately was
that
he was happy it happened, but then he
got replaced by thousands of Saddam's
because that's all they're doing. They just want
their controller. Their and, usually, they're far, far
worse than the person that's in power because
the reason they usually wanna manipulate that person
is because they're unwilling to completely bow to
what they want from them.
Not always in the interest of the people,
but either way, the point is we're gonna
destroy it until we get what we want
over and over and over.
Refugees were accepted without question in the EU
countries even though many were from the same
extremist factions destroying Syria for 14 years on
behalf of Israel, US, UK, EU, Turkey, and
Qatar Qatar allies.
By the way, the same refugees that the
Republican elements are pointing to to go look
at Muslim invasion.
Oh, you mean that the ones you funded
and then drove into foreign countries and then
justify yeah. Manufacturing
consent.
Immigrant weaponized immigration.
They're gonna use it to force some digital
ID down your throat.
It says without question in the EU, and
it goes on to say, now that the
same sectarian drugged up terrorists have taken power,
we are hearing the west talk about lifting
sanctions,
removing Hayatir al Sham from terrorist list, removing
the bounty of $10,000,000
off the leader of that terrorist organization, releasing
resources.
EU is closing borders to Syrian refugees now
under
genuine threat of death and persecution from the
Hayat al Sham led terrorist groups.
At the same time,
they're paying former refugees $1,000 to return to
Syria to be with the transitional terrorist regime.
Think about that.
They don't care about you. I think that's
just transparent.
Turkey and Qatar are reviving the US backed
pipeline that Assad turned down in favor of
the Russian Iranian option back in 2009.
If you can't see how this works yet
now definitely think the pipeline plays a major
role. But I don't think that's the primary
objective.
Dan Cohen points out in 2 1,012, as
we've pointed out before, Jake Sullivan emailed Hillary
Clinton and said Al Qaeda is on our
side in Syria.
There's many examples of this. Week a week
ago, anyone who pointed out the fact the
obvious fact that this relationship still existed was
denounced as an Assadist.
Now, Blinken confirms, as we showed you yesterday,
The US is openly coordinating with Hayat al
Sham, Al Qaeda.
When will supporters of the quote revolution admit
they're on the same side as the US
and Israel?
Probably never. Because they'll never openly let you
make that case. They'll always give you a
narrative that makes you feel like you weren't
wrong, and that's how partisans are easy to
manipulate.
Blinken reveals the US is in direct contact
with Syrian rebels, otherwise known as terrorist groups.
But rebels when they like to point at
them like there were like, they were rebels
when they were working with Idlib and fighting
Assad. They were moderate rebels when Obama was
fighting Assad.
But you
break away from that story for 10 seconds,
and it's like, well, we can see that
they're terrorists and or Idlib, Brett McGurk, largest
Al Qaeda hotspot since 911. Oh, wait. Never
mind. Now they're civilians because we want to
protect the narrative
every
time. And Rami Abdul from the Euro Red
Human Rights Group is pointing out that Netanyahu,
while we're over here pretending like these narratives
make sense, is openly rolling out plans to
settle Gaza.
Or, I mean, sorry, Syria.
The government unanimously approved
Netanyahu's plan to encourage settlement in Syria,
which, by the way, I don't even know
how that's surprising to anybody. Not only has
it repeated itself in every country they claim
they're fighting bad guys in, but re realistically,
it's everything that they've been telling you they're
gonna do.
For I mean,
if you listen to the corporate media and
the mainstream alternative media that give you the
narrative they want you to think to make
you ignore the reality, then you probably wouldn't
know this. But if you look at anything
else, if you look at people that have
been covering the history of this, like Vanessa
Bealey or Dan Cohen,
Karuka Maci, and the reality of the occupation
that's already been going on, the illegal occupation
of Golan Heights, the reality that they have
open documents showing what parts of Syria they
wanna take or the greater Israel project at
large,
it's very clear this was always the plan.
And I we I mean, we've been proving
that for a very long time. The problem
is that people just crutch their pearls and
scream racism.
Netanyahu says, quote, strengthening the Golan means strengthening
Israel. The Golan is Syrian territory. And he
says, and this is crucial during this period.
We will continue to hold on to, develop,
and settle it.
And that's just a statement. The point is
this is actually being reported as very clearly
happening.
Israel strikes Syria as Netanyahu proves plan to
expand
the Golan Heights settlement, which basically means taking
over Syria. You can read it for yourself.
It's not mincing worse. The reality is obvious
that they're going to expand as far as
they think they need to to keep themselves
safe even though they are the threatening element
in this conversation.
Because let's be clear. They're not fighting Haikar
al Sham. That's already been made very clear,
and I'll make a point about that in
a second. It's their element. They're the ones
giving them medical treatment, giving them funding, giving
them everything
along with the United States.
Now as we've said yesterday as well, Israel
is currently actively ethnically cleansing parts of Syria.
Like we told you would happen.
Ordering evacuations of villages.
Settlers gradually following. And he makes the same
point. Sound familiar?
It's the same plan
because this is what has always been the
objective.
They will gradually continue this incremental expansion, he
writes, until they connect their with to their
allies in the Druze enclave of Swayda. At
some point, an autonomous Druze
statelet will be proposed as an Israeli proxy.
It's all going to plan. Meanwhile, the brain
dead mobs still thinks that the western Israeli
backed Al Qaeda takeover Syria is a democratic
revolution.
And here is
part of these elements. Now I want you
to take note of the way they're dressed.
K. It's interesting to me.
And it says, we received orders from America
and Turkey not to come near minorities.
Interesting.
Even though we
know that's happening, which we'll show you right
here.
Already very clearly happening. And I wanna point
these out. Look at what they're dressed like.
K. Here's a post
of these are IDF
sitting in Syria. They can see because of
the flag on the wall. They're in just
and just like they're doing everywhere else,
stealing,
spray painting.
Here's that right there. We can see Oh,
here. Where was it?
Oh, it's right there. There on the wall.
So like spray painting graffiti all over their
homes. But if Okay. If they're liberating Syrians,
why are they doing that? Why are they
destroying their homes? Why are they bulldozing areas
inside of Syria? Why why why? Obviously, if
you're paying attention, you already know why. Because
they're taking over Syria for new illegal settlements
because their plan has been to take all
this territory for themselves.
Look at how the IDF is dressed.
K?
Now, look at this
IDF member with an ISIS patch.
I mean, I didn't mean to convince you
guys. You already probably know this. But hopefully,
we're gonna catch somebody out there that didn't
see the connection. And they are openly killing
these people.
This is this is an open assassination.
This has been covered by even corporate media,
but, of course, what they're saying in corporate
media is, look at these Assad regime stooges
that are being executed.
These are civilians. There's no indication in any
context other than what they're saying that these
are Assad regime elements.
What you can prove is that these are
IDF members by the way they're dressed and
they're working in conjunction with Hayat Er el
Sham and Israel and the United States and
Turkey on the ground.
And they're wearing ISIS patches, which, by the
way, shouldn't even be shocking if you've been
paying attention at all. Do you see ISIS
patches popping up on the Azov movement? You
see ISIS patches popping up on Turkish elements?
You see ISIS patches in Idlib? Because they're
working with them. It shouldn't be that difficult.
But I know it's people just don't wanna
see it. It's hard.
And here is Israeli TV.
Just like before, back when this started, October
7th forward, here they are again telling you
the truth because it's obvious that this is
what in Israel, this is public conversation, and
your people and your leaders in the US
don't know that? No. They very, very clearly
know what's going on. They're lying to you.
Here, their media is saying, it's true. They're
extremist and Al Qaeda,
but they are better because Assad was arming
Hezbollah.
Okay. But wait. So you're not fighting a
war against radical extremism?
Got it. You're working with it. Got it.
Okay. Just like everywhere else, by the way.
Just like the funding of Hamas or funding
of elements all over the con the US
government and Israel have been funding the most
radical elements of what they claim they've been
fighting for decades.
On the record, you can easily prove it
to this day.
I know that's what they're telling you. Yeah.
We don't care about the extremist. We just
didn't like Assad because he's arming our enemies
like you are all around the world, arming
the people that you're using to fight other
countries that you covet.
Here, as I showed you the other day,
BM is pointing pointing out this masonic Chabad
he calls lunatics
sitting in Syria, reading their religious scripts. And,
you know, the point is, it's already happening,
guys. These are these are IDF members. Why
in the world are they in Syria?
Because they're beginning just like we saw in
Lebanon, just like we saw in Gaza, to
incrementally increase
encroach into the area because that was the
design,
and they've been promised.
Tiberias says Israel has bombed Syria over 500
times since Assad fell and has annexed land
6 times the size of Gaza.
But you won't hear that on mainstream media.
They haven't said it a critical word because
our mainstream journalists, in quotes, are merely mouthpieces
for the criminal regime.
Now here while they're bombing all those locations
and literally taking land and arming their radicals
to go and murder whoever's not, you know,
whoever they decide,
here's what he says today. Israel not interested
in confrontation with Syria.
That's all. That's all you're gonna do. And
you're gonna get the Starmer's, and the Matt
Miller's, and the Blinken's, and the Corby's, and
the Biden's, and the Trump's coming out and
saying,
he wants peace.
He's supporting the revolution of Syria
while he's literally executing people in the streets
or funding those that are
like everywhere else.
The cradle points out Israeli prime minister's office
announces the government's approval of Netanyahu's
plan to expand illegal settlements
throughout the Golan Heights. I that should've been
a few tweets back. I didn't grab that.
Now Kavorka Mason points out,
as for all those that wanna pretend, like,
you know, well, we know that Israel's involved.
We know the US is involved, but we
know Assad is a bad guy, so let's
just see how it plays out. Well,
certainly, that shouldn't be your decision. But over
overall, historically, we have every single reason to
to expect that it will not.
What happened in Afghanistan?
What happened in Iraq?
What happened in Libya?
Well, here's an example. Here's a map of
Libya after 14 years of NATO's regime change
war.
He's I'm she said, I'm sure Syria Syria
will be different. What'd they do? They broke
it up. Balkanized location ruled by different supported
elements of the US, the UN, Israel, foreign
elements.
And it's being exploited incredibly. Now what's interesting,
you know, when you look at a map
right now, what do you see? Do you
see these 3 or 4 different carved out
locations? No. You see Libya. You know why?
Because they control information.
And so they don't want you to recognize
that Libya doesn't exist anymore, that it's ultimately
a broken up location that is being sold
out to the highest bidder for their interests.
Warring factions with open slave markets or, you
know, whatever the hell is going on today.
It's not what it was. You know, the
location with the highest quality of life in
all of Africa, free education, free health care,
and plenty of other problems like most places.
But it was also not this destroyed location.
They have made it that for their interest
by claiming they liberated it.
I just think it's incredible that even honest
people have a hard time acknowledging what the
history shows us.
As I jokingly said before,
let's just even say for fun that they
are trying to do good, which I don't
even know how you could think that, but
it's for fun.
Maybe we should step up and go, hey.
Hey. Hey. Guys, pump the brakes. Okay? You
see, I know you're trying to free people,
but you're batting 0. Okay? You keep stumbling
over something and causing chaos. So maybe you
should stop trying to help people. But I
think we know that's not what they're doing.
But somebody who tries and destroys countries over
and over and over and over, maybe we
should go, hey. Stop trying.
Let somebody else give it a go. You
get the joke. But the point is they're
not trying to help anybody. But either way,
it's obvious that we shouldn't let them keep
going.
Syrian girl points out that Druze religious authority
has now come out to say that there
apparently a viral video going around that was
claiming they wanna join Israel.
But based on the re the recent conversation
about the
iron dome bomb that killed all those kids
playing soccer that was a Druze community that
he lied about. And Netanyahu shows up to
pretend like he's there to help, and they
literally kick him out. They say, we aren't
in Israel because it's Syria they're talking about.
Well, here, the Druze community put the video
out,
claiming that they were lying, that they're loyal
to Syria, and
the the reality is this happens every time.
They float some illusion that gets the blind
followers out there to think
we're on the right side. See, the Syrian
people want them there, but they don't.
From Russia,
weirdly still not seemingly commenting on Assad or
anything else, which I don't know. I just
don't know how to read that. I can't
I can't tell if that means that there's
a shoe about to drop when it's ready
or that they're
part of it.
Maybe Assad's not even alive. Like, I just
don't understand how they could possibly not address
this by now unless there's some bigger thing
going on. But Maria Zakharova came out and
said their evidence will reveal that the US
and Israel were involved in the coup, which
we all I mean, anybody with objective
I mean, I don't even anybody with eyes
should be able to recognize that they're involved.
I mean, if there are Israel's in Syria
right now. The US and Israel have been
supporting the group that's there. They're both telling
you you know, and I don't even think
I have to explain that.
Douglas McGregor says, if anyone believes the United
States did not play a role in the
removal of Assad in Syria, I've got a
vacuum cleaner to sell you. He says, we
have had people on the ground working to
remove Assad since 2,011.
Exactly.
Exactly the case. Now we also have the
example that Turkey, according to Al Jazeera anyway,
has 4,000
Turkish citizens that are technically working with the
IDF
in Syria.
I think that's just important to consider in
this weird overlap. Right now, I'm not even
sure how I wanna place Turkey in the
overarching dynamic here because Turkey,
I think, recently just made a move I
was just reading about. Actually, I can't remember
exactly what the context was.
Oh, it was a deal that they I
at least reported they made some larger deal
with Iran.
I just it's just all these I I
honestly continue to thank the eve and this
is just a complete broad overview of just
my opinion with what I'm seeing that Turkey
continues to be the anomaly
that plays everybody.
Right? They're they're NATO Allied, but they seem
to take whatever action they can to bet
which I guess, outside of anything criminal or
murdering people or
occupying territory, why wouldn't they? What's interesting though
is that they don't seem to get pushback
from anybody. Israel, it's very strange. But Vanessa
seems to point out that they have a
lot more overlap with Israel than they want
people to know.
Now Jerusalem Post reports that Israel has no
more excuses for entering Syria.
Rebel leader, Jelani, says in front of major
TV interview. I pointed this out the other
day. This was yesterday.
But the point is you're saying this publicly.
They have no excuse to come in Israel.
But the reality of what they're really saying
is pretty weak. Now I lost the highlighting
here, but I think it was right here
right here. It says, this is Jelani again,
even though he's now calling himself al Shehrah,
which is varied by design to get you
to disconnect the names with all to all
Al Qaeda.
But he says, we are not looking to
engage in a conflict with Israel and cannot
bear such a battle. I made your point
yesterday.
Does that sound like what you'd expect from
a terrorist group or anybody?
That you're basically making it clear that we
can't bear to fight with such a strong
Israeli army,
which doesn't even that doesn't seem to be
the case at all, in fact. To me,
that screams
Israeli propaganda.
That you can't just be like, we're what
we wanna work with them. You have to
push it further to make it almost clownish.
To make the group that just took over
Syria to be like, we can't bear because
they're so strong.
And I don't think anybody's thinking that right
now outside of Israel. So screams something to
me, but either way,
we know they're working on behalf of the
US and Israel, so that says something. But
he says, we're not looking to engage in
conflict with Israel. So one end, you're saying,
they've got no reason to keep doing this,
but you've already made it clear you haven't
pushed back as they pinpoint targeted all of
the infrastructure of Syria, all the military locations,
all of the navy, and you just stood
there.
Even though that's your stuff, technically. Or as
I pointed out with Vanessa, why wouldn't they
have taken this stuff? Or, you know, it
just seems all of it was about was
destroying Syria so it could be recreated. That's
what they're doing.
Greater Israel.
And I even think you're gonna end up
seeing conflict a little bit about whether Turkey
or the US wanna give up parts. I
think Israel is designed on most of Syria.
And if you look at their map, that's
the case. There's no part in there where
they give Turkey some part in the north,
which is what they seem to be discussing.
So we'll see how that works out.
Overall,
the point is that they're demonstrating that they're
backing down,
which does not make sense with every narrative
we've been told about the radical Muslim elements
that wanna destroy you for your freedom or
whatever narrative it is. Now, yes, they're telling
you these groups have now been moderate now.
They're
now diversity friendly jihadists, which is actually what
they're saying.
But they're also pointing to the groups that
are
wearing ISIS patches.
So the point is, that's not true. That's
obvious.
They true that they're moderate.
But here's Iran, a rather through press TV
and through the IRGC chief saying Syria will
be liberated.
Now he doesn't necessarily say he'll do it
himself, but he does say the occupied terror
areas of Syria will be liberated
by the zealous Syrian
youth. Do not doubt this will happen. That
kinda gives the indication that they may work
with that, which they have in the past.
But it says America's foothold will not last
either. By God's grace and power, the US
will also be expelled from the regions by
the resistance front.
So there's a lot of dispute about Iran's
part in this, whether they sold them out,
whether they were told to leave. It's either
way, he seems to be still taking a
stand against these elements and saying that Syria
should be free. Could just be narrative.
Syrian girl points out that Turkish accounts
from as about what has happened in Qatar
was that they threatened Russia and Iran
not to save Syria.
So that's interesting. So Turkish media is claiming
that Russia and Iran were threatened not to,
which in a way does kinda make sense,
but why they would have been backed down
by a threat. Who knows?
But he says Turkey convinced Russia and Iran
not to provide military support to Assad. Now
this is just complete speculation from rather statements
from Turkish media, which we should not take
at face value. It says our meetings in
Ankara and Doha, Turkey and Qatar, were devoted
to this issue. Negotiations were held, and that
night, we received a phone call after which
Assad left, which by the way aligns with
what Sputnik said.
It says if the Syrian regime had received
support, things could have ended very bloodily. The
Russians and Iranians realized that continuing this was
no longer made sense. Now that's his statement.
I would argue that realistically, should they have
stood this, not back down, that this wouldn't
have happened.
Unless the US went full blow on this,
but then that probably would have
I mean, let's be real here. If the
if Russia was not standing down and Iran
was not there, I don't think even the
US involvement would have been able to overtake
that.
But
either way, they did. And now, here we
are.
And Turkey's simply claiming they were threatened to
not to. Now, you could argue that's a
way to give them kind of a pass.
But I really I don't think we should
continue to assume based on more assumption until
we get more information.
Because right now, it seems completely opaque. Now,
rapidly going through this since it's been covered
to death, I just think it's important again
that you haven't seen it to recognize that
this report
I'll see if and see if it has
it on there now. Oh, that oh, it
is there. See? The the fact check from
Twitter. Ain't it funny how the fact check
was something we laughed at until now Twitter
does it? So now it's a good thing.
Verify sci, it says a Syrian fact checking
group. Now says this man is Air Force
Intelligence First Lieutenant Salah Mohammed Salma, notorious for
extorting
and theft in Homs, who had been arrested
due to disputes with his colleagues about profit
sharing. So interesting.
So what's very telling to me
is that this is now it Twitter's fact
check that's now starting to drift back the
other direction to make it suggest that, yeah,
he was arrested, but maybe for the right
reason.
Okay. To be very clear,
the amount of information I've seen around this
story, the ridiculous propaganda sense of the whole
thing, the way they framed it, and this
girl and Claressa Ward being a part of
it. I mean, every part of this seems
to scream
completely fake.
The the fact that the guy is the
guy is not diminished. He's not pale. He's
not emaciated.
I mean, skin color. I mean, I'm I'm
referencing what experts have said who know what
people look like when they've been held.
Or the point they make that people apparently
hadn't been there for 4 to 5 days.
And apparently, we're pretending he survived with no
water and food.
I just it there's nothing about this that
makes sense. So I find it very telling.
Here's what it said before that.
The Syrian former detainee notes inconsistencies.
Communal cells were not used for individual purposes,
which they've claimed that's where he was. The
cells appear unusually unusually clean, and the prisoner's
energy level seems inconsistent with claimed 5 days
water deprivation.
And there's others that came out and just
flatly said, this is proven to be false.
This is kind of interesting how this system
so all it really means is if you've
got enough bots, you can influence what that
says. That's all that's all the fact check
means on Twitter. Because now you're just getting
this bad really, if we're it should be
something that constantly changes
diametric opposites. That doesn't make much sense to
me. But either way, the point is that
this is, I think, provably fake. And as
Rachel Blevins says, wait wait wait. So this
guy somehow missed several days of prisons being
raided and wasn't until CNN crew just randomly
found him that they realized he was free?
I mean, just it's cartoonish.
And come and then, by the way, comes
out and then stares directly at the sun?
Come on.
Anybody's been in a dark room for 15
minutes knows that's not what would happen, but,
you know, whatever.
Oh, not a bit trend.
Same points. I I'm gonna skim past it.
He may you know, I always like his
take. He seems a very intelligent person. But
see but Angelo Angelo pointing out what a
real,
detained person looks like. That's that's the guy
he was taken. This is what he looked
like when Israel released him.
And this guy is what was released from
this prison. Seemingly almost gained weight, or overweight
rather.
Max saying the same thing, and then references
This is funny, this is another Remember this
one? Where she literally
smells the bag that's suspected of sarin, or
whatever it was? And then goes, I my
nose was stinging,
which is probably why you never saw her
again. Like, you're pretty much in any real
context because that's so stupid. And they're lying.
They must know they're lying.
And Caitlin Johnstone points out this
very, very, very well documented, very broken down
deception.
The, what is it? Aba,
what's her name? Oh, she writes it up
here. It's,
oh, no, I guess not.
Abad? Something Abad? What is it?
It doesn't even matter at this point.
You know, the girl, the the young searing
girl that basically was reading scripts, and they
asked her questions, and she basically was responding
with stage. I mean, the point was this
was broken down to be utterly fabricated. As
well as the child on the back of
the ambulance. Remember that? With the blood in
his face? That the father came out later
and said they they they bribed him with
food and they made him look like that.
I mean, it just it's crazy. If you
have to fake all of this,
clearly, it's not at least what they're claiming.
Same with every other location we're talking about.
And then here is Sam Stein from MSNBC.
This may be one of the most profound
pieces of TV cable journalism I've seen in
ages.
Or a complete lie, you know, whatever. Apples
or oranges. It's just funny that you know,
Bonna, thank you. Her name is Bonna.
I mean,
just seems like a pretty dumb thing to
say off something that wasn't that I mean,
anyway, it's just it's just these people are
circling the wagons, it seems.
And then here's another example of one that
was in Lebanon. I think this was a
yeah. It was a,
basically, they're making the joke. It's put make
right after what she did, and they come
to this guy in Lebanon and say that
he was from Lebanon and held in Syria,
and that we are now helping you get
released. And the guy literally
I
thought what happened and literally flew us on
camera. It's just I I we went over
this already. It's a it's a 2 minute
video. The point is ultimately lies upon lies
upon lies. This one too, US Mount found
wandering near Damascus after months in Syrian prison.
And Craig Murray says the evidence that Travis
Timmer Timmerman was detained at all seems distinctly
dubious. At the most basic level, for a
white man who's been locked inside for 7
months, in all photos, he's entirely the wrong
color. No prison power or flabbiness amount. Huge
amount of BS coming out of the media
right now. They're manufacturing this stuff because they
have to.
Bryce Greene points out that there's been a
lot of talk about conditions of government prisons
in Syria,
but less about the sprawling network of US
run prisons in Northern Syria where right this
moment, 50,000 men, women, and children are kept
in abhorrent conditions. You know why we know
that?
Amnesty International covered it. April 17, 2024.
Syria, aftermath, injustice, torture, and death in detention
in Northeast Syria.
The autonomous authorities of the Northeast Syria, with
the support of the US government and other
members of the coalition to defeat ISIS, which
is not what's happening,
are engaged in a large scale systematic violation
of the rights of more than 56,000
men, women, and children in their custody.
Why doesn't that matter?
Well, you obviously know why. Because it's about
the control of the narrative in the interest
of their agendas. It's not about who who's
committing crimes.
It's about who you can tell you or
who you can I mean, in some cases,
there are crimes being committed? I was gonna
say frame them for. But the reality is
that they don't are not about trying to
hold people accountable. They're not trying to enforce
human rights or international law. They are literally
breaking all those things in the interest of
their agendas and then using those as coercive
tools to go after, in many cases, people
not doing any of that.
It's a very grotesque perversion
of what we think we care about, or
rather I should say what we care about,
what they pretend they care about.
And this goes back for decades. I mean,
you you can see an amnesty, human rights
watch, the UN breaking down what Israel's been
doing for decades.
And then, Wyatt Reed. Oh, that's interesting. They
took away the man, this is so funny
this platform works.
Well, there was oh, there he he he
screenshot it. How interesting. This platform is very
strange. He says, leaked photos revealed brutal torture
in Syria's Sidania prison. Retweet if you believe
any regime that does this must be overthrown.
Now what's hilarious to me is it's very
clear what he's trying to do. I mean,
maybe not everybody picks it up by view,
but obviously these are from, if you've been
seeing them in the past, from Guantanamo Bay,
conducted by the US and Israel. Or rather,
specifically Israel or rather United States and foreign
allies. But I've Israel has a very clear
connection to this with what we've seen
in all these actions and what they're doing.
But what's interesting
is that it seems like most people are
like, that's Bartaro, you moron. He's like, fuck,
guys. Like, clearly he knows that. Clearly, what
he's trying to do is get people who
don't know that to be outraged
and and go, Look at what Syria did!
And then realize, Oh, wait. That's my government.
And then go, Oops. Have a short secret,
a moment where your brain has to reconcile
that.
It works.
And some people just choose to ignore it
because they aren't interested in the truth, but
somebody who actually is interested in the truth
but has a block because of propaganda,
that works.
Where suddenly you're outraged going, how could anybody
do this? Sirius.
Assad's a monster. And then going, oh,
my people did and then you just have
a moment where you go, wow. Okay.
Like, if you're honest, that's a pretty gut
check moment.
Now as the squirrel points out, they took
videos of children and women they raped,
and the US still has those tapes, but
refuses to give anyone access to them because,
quote, that would inflame the region against us.
That's real.
They raped children who became pregnant and then
killed them. Now these are this is reported
by The Guardian.
Now if you don't remember the disgusting realities
when we went down at Guantanamo Bay and
then realize why they were doing these things
with conjunction with Israel and what we've seen
them do in Gaza.
Again, I just don't think you wanna see
it. And I I get why. It's horrifying.
But here's what,
he points out. Can't get anything past these
guys.
And it says, these photos are from Iraq
Afghanistan war, and people are committing torture in
USA soldiers. Oh, so, basically, they're saying, like,
he he's wrong. He's, like, he's making a
joke because, obviously, that was the point.
Now, Adam also points out that while they're
all screaming about things that Vanessa Bailey has
basically broken down as false around that prison,
no one's talking about the rape that they
had on video in Israel.
Not anymore anyway. Why didn't CNN
travel to one of the Israeli's torture prisons?
They're literally on camera raping a prisoner, but
Western media
have only just now rediscovered the torture is
evil.
Dan Cohen writes, what do Zionists think of
Syrians?
Listen to rabbi Nachman
Kahana,
brother of the most influential rabbi in Israeli
history,
about how Syrian children are little snakes that
should die.
He says, congratulations, revolutionaries.
You've just been used by people who want
to exterminate you like they're doing to Gaza.
This issue today being discussed in Israel
about the poor Syrian children
who are subject to a very,
onhumane,
conduct by the Syrian government.
Question, should Israel taken these children or the
adults? By the way, Israel has already treated
thousands
of Syrians in the hospitals.
The
Yeah. Those are terrorists, guys. Even their own
media has reported that. Those are Syrian Al
Qaeda rep moderate rebels.
But you see how they love to just
blend the line when they wanted to work
for them? You know, like, innocent girls have
been kidnapped. Oh, you mean those IDF members
that were conducting torture and yeah. Not the
same story. That's how this works.
Meant of our own citizen because remember, you
can only have one operation at a time.
And I have to say something about this.
It said in the Talmud
that
King Solomon,
the wise of all men
Just so you can see it real quick,
in case you didn't know before, Israeli treating
all kind of fighters and wounded Syrian civil
war.
He's I mean, that's how that's how inherently
dishonest these people are. To him in a
dream,
a man
who had went had legislation
against a snake.
Moses story. He come to Solomon in dream.
They met the snake on the road. Snake
was half dead. It was run over by,
you know, by a taxi or something. Dead.
So I took the snake.
I brought him home. I nursed him. I
gave him milk, but,
but my little thing dropped,
and I bent him strong again. As soon
as he got strong,
he bit me
and I died.
And I want the snake to be punished.
And the Solomon says to the snake, why
do you do such a thing?
He says, because I'm a snake.
That's what I am.
There are big snakes and little snakes.
Little snakes, they're little children there, but they're
snakes. They grow out to be big snakes.
Now how Now that is exactly what,
I'm blanking on his name now. Member of
parliament from Ireland. I have a clip that
I played in the past where he highlights
plenty of Israeli elements literally calling peep the
children of Gaza little snakes, and we should
kill them. There's a reason for that. And
you I'm sure you can remember where else
you've heard that analogy. That would be a
nice little girl with pigtails,
nice little boy.
They'll grow
up, have it, and they drink it with
the milk of their mothers that they hate
the Jewish people.
That's what you wanted to do? It's disgusting.
We're not killing anybody, but we have to
go out of our way then save a
little snake, and then it'll come and it'll
bite you.
We're surrounded by very bad people in this
in this part of the world.
Okay. Should you remember where else you've heard
that? I think it's very relevant today.
Who has heard the poem
called The Snake?
So I have it. Does anybody wanna hear
it again? Yes. You sure?
Are you sure?
Yes.
Okay.
So let's dedicate this
to
general Kelly, the border patrol,
and the ICE agents for doing such an
incredible job.
Right?
Know what we're going to have called the
snake.
On her way to work
one morning,
down the path
along the lake,
a tenderhearted
woman
saw a poor
half frozen snake.
His pretty colored skin
had been all frosted
with the dew.
Poor thing, she cried, I'll take you in
and I'll take care of you.
The border.
Take me in, oh tender woman.
Take me in, for heaven's sake.
Take me in, oh tender woman.
Side
the vicious snake.
So don't miss the point that he's referencing
immigrants coming into this country.
Usually, because belligerent foreign policy of the US
government as the snake. That's where he points
you to the border. But the point people
make is that this is at least we
should consider whether this is about him.
She wrapped him up all cozy
in a comforter
of silk
and laid him by her fireside
with some honey
and some milk.
She hurried home from work that night,
and as soon as she arrived,
she found that pretty snake
she'd taken in
had been revived.
Take me in, oh tender woman.
Take me in for heaven's sake.
Take me in, oh tender woman,
beside that vicious snake.
She clutched him to her bosom.
You're so beautiful, she cried.
But if I
hadn't brought you in
by now, oh heavens,
you would have died.
She stroked his pretty skin again
and kissed him
and held him tight.
But instead of saying
thank you,
that snake gave her a vicious
bite.
Take me in, oh tender woman.
Take me in for heaven's sake.
Take me in,
oh tender woman.
Side
the vicious
sake.
I have saved you,
cried the woman,
and you've bitten me heavens wide.
You know your bite is poisonous
and now I'm going to die.
Oh, shut up,
silly woman,
said the reptile with a grin.
You knew damn well I was a snake
before you took me in.
So what's the argument there based on the
way he's presenting that? That all of them
are snakes or that we should you know,
it's it's a very gross over and these
these are the points people make about why
you can't just pretend like he doesn't mean
that or you're misrepresenting what he said. There's
a very clear point being made there. Now,
it's very clearly from some analogy point meant
to argue that these people are all dangerous.
Either way, it's important to consider this this
is that's clearly the same story. I think
that's interesting. And the context of what he's
saying is actually or rather, the the reason
I think it's important to highlight is considering
the main point from before that
the analogy applies equally to him or anybody
else in these positions.
If you read his books, if you look
at what he's talked about, and same goes
for Biden, damn near everybody in a political
position that I could point to right now,
they have examples of where they show you
what they are, whether it's supporting genocide or
supporting certain legislation.
But the point is we always give them
a pass. We always wanna rationalize
because he said this nice thing or he
wore this certain thing or because he, you
know, works with this certain guy. And the
problem is that the analogy is the same.
He told you what he was. Now Dan
Cohen,
in regard to the point he was making
a moment ago, we covers this great discussion,
the Mac manufactured Middle East plight and the
Zionism linchpin. We interviewed him on October 5th.
Now that again, it wasn't the the video
right there, but it was the point he
played before about the rabbi. And the point
he's making is that this is what Zionists
think of Syria. Right? And the point of
the interview is to highlight, as a Jewish
person himself, that saying that is not secretly
about Jewish people. He doesn't think that. He's
talking about Zionism, and that's what that guy
represents, whether he's Jewish or not.
That's important.
But Syrian girl highlights the US said Assad
needs to go because he fired on protesters.
And then you've heard me talk about that
many times, the complete dis the deception that
it was just like it was in Venezuela,
like it was
in Afghanistan, like it was in Iraq. They
do the same thing everywhere.
Assad was not responsible for this.
And, again, that's very clear. We've gone over
this in the past. But that's what they
claimed. He shot innocent people in the protest.
Number 2, the US backs Syrian Democratic Forces,
otherwise known as terrorists.
Number 3, Syrian Democratic Forces
fire on protesters.
That's where we are, guys. This is happening
as of 12th. Protesters lining up and they're
firing on them. It's it's the kind of
thing that we keep seeing. It only matters
when
you can use it against someone they don't
like. Now, in this case, we have Syrian
refugees,
this was on 12th, who are fleeing the
Lebanon. And I think that's important because it
shows you at least at some level, you've
got people
that recognize what's going on. They recognize that
they're at risk because of what happened, whether
or not they support Assad. And I think
by and large, I think the what I
think I can see is that most people
in Syria do not support what's happening.
Even if they didn't like Assad, mind you,
and I think that's important.
Now ending in the last part here,
Iran, bringing it back to the beginning and
the drone and everything else, is very clearly
being positioned.
Or in in rather, Israel, United States, and
everything else are positioning for the next step.
Israel can now use Syrian airspace, Vanessa writes,
to target Iraq and eventually Iran.
The plan is to be weaponized is to
weaponize ISIS
against all resistance factions in Iraq and to
secure a US Israeli corridor that will border
Iran.
All this is and was facilitated by Hayat
al Sham Al Qaeda terrorists
who, all along, have been given a free
pass in the west because of their illusion
of solidarity with Palestine. Is anything becoming clearer
now?
And an hour 20 hours ago, 58 Israeli
attacks in Damascus Suburbs. Suburbs, guys. It's like
they moved beyond bombing military installations. Now they're
just murdering civilians in Damascus.
If you're shocked by that, I don't think
you've been paying attention. This is what they
do.
And whether that's because they wanna punish Syrians
for not acquiescing or because they're just villainous
psychopathic entities,
either way, doesn't matter. They're murdering civilians, and
they're on video bombing civilian locations when there's
nobody fighting back. Guys, we're a week a
week I mean, more than that.
We have clear evidence as even corporate media
has reported that there's no resistance right now.
Hayat Sheryl Shamm has basically stood back,
and that they're on the same side anyway.
There's nobody fighting, and so what are they
bombing for? Now even when it was military
installations, it was still a crime. There was
no resistance. Now they're bombing civilian location in
Damascus.
Even if there was resistance, that would be
a crime. But now we're at a point
where you can prove in such vivid color
that they're just bombing innocent people,
and still the west supports them.
Now I said before,
Israel is already claiming they see an opportunity
to bomb Iran after the downfall of Assad.
Netanyahu's
already talking to the Iranian people. This is
on the 12th.
He says your oppressor has spent over $30,000,000,000
supporting Assad in Syria. After only 11 days,
he collapsed into dust. Like so he's already
trying to get this narrative. Why would you
be speaking to the Iranian people? That's a
threat. That's what that is. This is a
he's beginning to roll this out and hoping
now, whether this is them
feeling like they have to rapidly go through
this because they don't have much time or
because they just think they can get away
with I don't know.
But it's so
clear what they're doing
is not in the interest of anything other
than what they want to accomplish for their
own interests.
Aramati points out the threat from an Israeli
pilot on how regime changes Syria has now
made it easier to bomb Iran.
It's all just having casual
conversations.
Despite talk of nuclear leap,
little about Iran's new enrichment program has changed.
And simple point on that is that they're
just simply pointing to the enrichment again,
Which by the way, as it's they're not
creating a bomb as even the I even
the state department said recently.
But what this is about hyping what we
already know. But for people that don't know
that and framing it as nuclear threat, which
is exactly what they're using it for. Because
here is Trump
saying, we're considering preemptive strikes, otherwise called attacks,
on a country not attacking you
for something they're not doing, which is nuclear
war weapon development. So here is already the
clearest indication that Trump is beginning the path
for Israel's war,
which, by the way, he tried to start
during his administration. He assassinated Soleimani, and they
didn't do anything. He tried to kick off
war with Venezuela.
I mean, rather could have with his actions.
The point is very clear that the narrative
was not the same. Had Iran responded, we'd
we'd be at war with Iran right now.
It's just easy to play you against these
things, but what you want to believe. The
truth is that they've always been in league
with this. Trump transition team considering strikes on
Iran. Antiwar.com
breaks it down.
We'll finish with this clip
showing you what
Netanyahu thinks terrorism is.
Then, stand back and look at what's happening
today, and tell me how it's different than
what he's describing.
I'll leave it there for today. Thank you
for tuning in, guys.
Please be objective.
Remain skeptical of all these things. I definitely
think there's some things going on around this.
But, like, I'm point being, like, real like,
like a drone conversation and all this. Like,
there's there's real elements of this. But I
think we can all acknowledge that there's something
very fishy about the way it's being used.
So just pump the brakes.
Recognize that there's partisan media everywhere really desperate
to get you invested in one thing or
the other, whether it's because they're invested in
agenda or because they just wanna grow their
channel. And then there's plenty of people that
aren't even parsing me to do that. That's
everywhere. It's always been the case. But just
be skeptical because I think it's at a
fever pitch right now.
In a very dangerous time where we're watching
this technocratic revolution happen very quietly underneath everything
else, They're positioning to go to war with
Iran while claiming that what they're doing is
spreading freedom and ending that conflict. I mean,
it's obvious this is
escalating
while it should be going the other direction.
Now, I've mentioned many times about what we
need to think about and how we can
affect that change while we
the the momentum is there. How we roll
that into something else? I hope we can
ask.
But continue to stand up and fight for
these things, guys, because the people that are
in Gaza, Lebanon,
Syria,
many other locations that we're not even talking
about
are constantly suffering because of our governments. Or
rather the people pretending to be our governments
and doing whatever they want for whatever agenda
they're trying to accomplish. But it is still
being seen as as the United States, as
Israel, as the people within that.
Show the world that you don't believe this.
Show the world that you do not align
with these terrible things.
It's important.
Thank you for being here. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant. What terrorists do
is target the innocent deliberately.
Therefore, my definition of terrorism is the systematic
and deliberate attack, the murder, naming, and menacing
of innocent civilians.
Her name is Hinn Brijab,
and she was just 5 years old when
she was killed with her family trapped in
a vehicle.
You can tell a lot about terrorists but
what happens when they come to power. They
end up as being masters of terrorist states.