Sometimes it's of necessity. Who's available?
The the the one that I think is
most,
most discussed and most misunderstood
is the evolution with our counterpart in Syria,
the the so called Syrian Democratic Forces. Now
interestingly, they came about that name because at
one point in time, and I dealt with
them directly. I I was, you know, the
formative stage of of of the relationship with
these guys.
They formally called themselves the YPG, who the
Turks would say equated to the PKK, you're
dealing with a terrorist enemy of mine, how,
you know, how how can you do that
ally? So we literally played back to them,
and you gotta change your brand. You know,
what what do you wanna call yourself besides
the YPG?
And with about a day's notice, they declared
that they were the Syrian Democratic Forces.
I thought it was a stroke of brilliance
to put democracy in there somewhere,
but it gave them a little bit of
credibility. And and the interesting part and and
I was lucky to have a great partner
in Brett McGurk out there with me about
the same time because they were asking for
things that I couldn't give them. And it
it literally was an acknowledgment that they were
the demographic,
dominant,
force in Northern Syria. They wanted a seat
at the table, whether it's at Geneva or
Astana or wherever talks are happening about the
future of Syria. And because they had been
branded as PKK, they could never get to
the table. So while we paired with them
militarily,
Brett McGurk was able to to keep them
in in the in the conversation and and
allow them the, you know, the necessary legitimacy,
to to to be good partners for us.
So it was literally something I need you
militarily,
you know, Hill, the diplomat here will deliver,
an an entree if nothing else for you
to be legitimate,
you know, from a state standpoint or from
a from at least a government standpoint later
on. Idlib province is the largest Al Qaeda
safe haven since 911.
The problem in the United States is about
the whole political system. It's not about 1
person.
Trump's
election has proven again for us, again and
again,
that the president is only a performer. He's
not the decision maker.
He's part of different lobbies and the deep
states or the deep regime, as you can
call it, who implement
and dictate
on the president what should he be,
doing.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Tuesday, December 10th 2024. Thank you for joining
me today. I apologize for the delay in
getting started. There appear to be all sorts
of problems everywhere in the streaming world today.
It looks like we're being broadcasting on StreamYard.
You guys can hear me and let me
know everything sounds okay. This morning, AM Wake
Up wasn't able to go live because, I
guess, StreamYard was having some kind of an
audio issue. I believe that was rectified. For
whatever reason today, I'll show you some things
to start. Rumble's not working for us. And
Facebook already censored this show, so maybe there's
more going on there. But in any case,
a lot to talk about.
We're gonna follow-up on Syria and continuing to
highlight what's going on there. I mean, the
bulk of today will be
seeing as how that really is a center
point of what a that ties to a
lot of what's going on, including the I
mean, just the general Middle East Israel focused
dynamic.
And a a few other points that I
think are important to highlight today. I put
off something I'm gonna discuss tomorrow
around glyphosate
just because it seemed to be the one
part that was a little bit disjointed for
the focal point today. But important just to
throw it out there, a new study just
came out as of yesterday
showing you what we already know around glyphosate.
Now, I was just gonna make another point
to highlight how important it is to realize
how ubiquitous it is. And I say that
a lot, but I I tend to think
people don't really take me seriously when I'm
trying to tell you that it's in the
air, it's in your clothes, it's in the
water you're drinking, and to realize how alarming
that is
wherever. Even if it's not a super dangerous
chemical, the fact that that's something that we
didn't decide and it's happening. I'll get to
that tomorrow. My point though is there's a
lot of different things that are we're gonna
get to today that are mostly connected to
the main point of this of the
Syria focus.
But I wanna make a point about surveillance
that overlaps with Israel that has to do
with Palantir that we're gonna discuss, a couple
quick points about censorship.
And and and and I I one point
that stands out to me that I that
I guess you could say is
still connected because of Israel, but the point
I wanted to highlight was to stand back
for a second and reiterate what we were
on what people have become,
begun
have that's feel sounds like feels like that
sounds wrong for some reason, have begun to
understand about Zionism.
And really wanted to make sure we're clear
about
not just the the main point that Zionism
is ultimately a political organization that is manipulating
religion in a lot of different perspectives, but
that that is a growing understanding of, in
particular,
Jewish populations in the world. And I've been
saying that as well, and it's continuing to
become more prevalent. And I wanted to highlight
that not just because
of that point being important, to see the
manipulation, the lie, the deception around it, but
because of how important that is to all
these other discussions,
seeing what Zionism is and how that's driving
most of what we're dealing with in this
conversation.
And I want you to see how that
plays into it. But, of course, the main
point today, the ongoing
or, actually and I I will add one
part about kind of making sure we're not
missing the ongoing genocide in Gaza and showing
you how Syria plays into that and catching
up on what still is going on. There's
some really important points that are developing around
the story from Syria that we discussed over
the last couple of days that I am
really I think what we highlighted seems to
be the most logical still to this point.
I'll give you some points that have deviated
or more so as well as bolster what
we were saying, but there's a lot that's
still up in the air. Vanessa Bailey has
added a few things that I think are
important, especially around,
something for example, Assad's
alleged,
resignation speech.
She's arguing that that ultimately was made
and was supposed to go out, but because
of a deal or rather a sabotage of
a deal, somebody as acting
has stopped that from going out. And now
the narrative is he doesn't care. He's fled.
He's a coward, and he never even gave
us speed. All it's all starting to add
up is what kinda what we were talking
about before, but still make sure we're being
very skeptical. Everything's still up in the air.
But I wanna start with the censorship point
that I wanted to highlight to you
because of it's just really interesting to me
how this
the timing of it all. Now, this is
just completely expected. Facebook just as ridiculous as
it is immediately, and I mean instantaneously.
The it just the the link itself from
the from the t lab website about this
show today was immediately removed.
Which is funny. All so I guess based
on the image, based on the name, it
just shows you how frivolous they are with
their censorship.
That this is just blatantly you're not allowed
to talk about these topics. We don't even
know what you're gonna say censored,
which is completely expected. Now, unfortunately, whatever's going
on with Rumble, I don't know. I'm not
gonna pretend. I know it's more than just
a glitch.
But I pointed this out before I went
live because this happens to me all far
too often. So right now it just doesn't
seem to be playing. So for those of
you that are trying to watch on Rumble,
I apologize.
I wanna put it one more time in
the chat
because it seems like everyone is still there.
It's not gonna be playing on Rumble, it
appears.
Rumble not working.
Bear with me. I just wanna make sure
all the people waiting there are gonna be
going somewhere else to watch it. I'll put
the BitChute link in the chat there for
you guys, but there's, you know, Rockfin, plenty
of other places.
Now, again, I wanna stress, I don't really
know what's going on. Right? There's been a
lot of weird stuff happening today, so it
could be something larger that we're not seeing,
could be something coordinated that we don't recognize.
Either way, this is something I see often
on Rumble that happens to me. And I'm
I don't I'm actually I I haven't asked
that far around, but I don't know anybody
else that has expressed they've seen this. I
go set up a live stream,
which by the way, that means there's no
video to process.
It does take a small amount of processing
to set up the the stream, but that's
instantaneous.
Anyone that does this knows you you set
up the stream and it goes right into
your your page where your your video is
ready and it just that
processing is 9 times out of 10 after
you post a video
or are done with the livestream or upload
a video and has to process before it
can be shown. So I set up a
livestream and I get this 1% process line.
In some cases, that has never gone away
and I wasn't even able to stream that
day. I thought it was a while ago,
but I've talked about it. And when you
guys look at this, when it's like that,
it says private. So who knows what that
is? Kinda sounds like a glitch to me,
but if it's selectively applied, that could be
censorship. Either way, right now, I'm not able
to stream. So please, if anyone's out there,
if you're on the chat, let them know
to go everywhere else because we have a
lot to talk about today. But interesting timing,
isn't it, with what was going on with
Facebook censorship with a topic today that is
very, very contentious?
So
what we're gonna talk about today to start
is really just I wanted you to make
sure you're not missing how all encompassing this
really is. And so the points we're gonna
start about today, one that is a little
bit outside the
foreign policy talking points. But
as Sarah Abdallah writes, this and this is
from today.
This is
oops.
Sorry. People screaming in the background that you
have to hear that, but it's from 4:30
PM today. Horrifying scenes from Betelahaya,
Israel, and this is the part to hear.
Israel is currently seizing land in Syria.
It's currently
bombing Syria,
bombing Lebanon,
seizing land in Lebanon,
bombing Gaza,
seizing land in Gaza,
bombing the West Bank,
seizing the West Bank,
and East Jerusalem.
And that's not hyperbolic. I hope you're I
hope we're very clear about that. This is
public everywhere you look right now. Few are
connecting it all in one position like this,
and she says the same western regimes that
screamed about Ukraine's sovereignty now applaud Israel's theft
of our lands as, quote, liberation.
It is really wild what we're looking at
right now. Not just I mean,
it's almost like I'm getting tired of saying
that. Like, it's actually it's
comical. It's cartoonish where we are.
The
Azov movement was one thing where suddenly these
Nazis no longer Nazis because narrative.
Now we're literally being told it's okay to
support Al Qaeda, the group that was the
basis for everything they say they're doing because
we don't like the other guy or because
Israel
forced its way in. And, again, I really
think that's what ultimately happened here, and I'll
I'll touch on it in a second, that
there was an opening that Israel took advantage
of despite deals, agreements, or even what the
US just
rushed in and took over Syria or or
is still doing so.
And the fact that we just pretend like
that's not crazy, not even if everything they
said about Assad was true. I mean, even
they claim there's some semblance of international law
or
or anything, guidelines that they just run right
over the top because they say we're the
right I mean, I you guys know. I
don't need to stress this. Anybody with a
a modicum of honesty is going, this is
pretty crazy.
Even if you agree with Israel and United
States, you're still going I mean, it just
shows you that there's a lawless nature to
what they're doing, and that should make you
uncomfortable.
Now this is something oh, in regard to
censorship in general,
on the note of what's going on. It's
in it's actually crazy to me that how
clear it is this topic being censored specifically,
and I mean specifically by the people claiming
they're fighting for free speech.
And this is this is this is
specifically
about
the
2 points about the killing in Gaza, about
the ongoing murder, genocide that's happening, but also
the interesting note of how this
non graphic content
relentlessly gets labeled as graphic seemingly only when
I post it, which is really interesting to
me.
So you know what? This is gonna be
a long show. Let's play it. When were
you in Gaza?
End of April for the 1st couple weeks,
and then there's sniper bullets. I have children
that were shot twice. Wait. You're saying that
children in Gaza are being shot by snipers?
Definitively.
I have 2 children that I have photographs
of that were shot so perfectly in the
chest I couldn't put my stethoscope over their
heart more accurately
and directly on the side of the head
in the same child. No toddler gets shot
twice by mistake by the world's best sniper,
and they're dead center shots.
In fact, more than 20 doctors recently in
Gaza also told Sunday morning about gunshot wounds
to children.
One American doctor told us he even reviewed
CT scans to confirm what he saw because
he quote, didn't believe that this many children
could be admitted to a single hospital
with gunshot wounds to the head.
Some shootings
have been captured on video.
So of all the disaster zones you've seen,
how does Gaza compare?
All of the dis disasters I've seen combined
combined. 40 mission trips, 30 years, ground 0,
earthquakes.
All of that combined
doesn't equal
the level of carnage
that I saw against civilians
in just my 1st week in Gaza.
And when you say civilians,
is it mostly children?
Almost exclusively children.
I've never seen that before.
Never seen that. I've seen more
incinerated children than I've ever seen in my
entire life combined. I've seen more shredded children
in just the 1st week. Shredded. Shredded. What
do you mean? Missing body parts, being crushed
by buildings, the greatest majority,
or bomb explosions,
the next greatest majority. We've taken shrapnel as
big as my thumb
out of 8 year olds.
The UN reports that to date, more than
80% of Gaza's population has been displaced
and the majority of its buildings
destroyed.
A reality which has taken its own toll
on the well-being of children.
What about the emotional wounds? How can you
measure that?
I can't measure my own.
How do you be a,
an orphan
watching your family, you know, melted in front
of you and shredded in front of you?
How do you fix that? Ever fix that?
In fact, so many Palestinian children have had
family members killed that doctors created a shorthand
term,
w c n s f,
wounded child,
no surviving family.
So I wasn't planning on playing that since
we've seen it so many times, but I
I tell that that gets me every single
time.
Somebody like that breaking up emotionally when he's
covered so much horror in the world. So
my point, guys,
is that this is something that I'm posting
pretty commonly on Twitter because it's a very
powerful clip that's not graphic. By every definition
that they would label, so it's not you
could read the graph the definition of what
they think. It's not words and just even
describing things. He's not even using very other
than shredded, he's not using graphic things. Like,
he's not describing some graphic scene. Right?
And he's not showing anything.
So the point is you post this, and
I I made a very clear point about
this, that I've seen other people post this
that I've even getting more it doesn't get
labeled. I just think it's so clear that
there are, like, whatever, unless if is it
the the labels that that,
a oh, APAC.
What was it? APAC tracker? Here it is.
Demonstrated,
you know, that this was on
the 7th August where he was he showed
that TLav
had all these different labels that were suppressing
the the the account on Twitter. Who knows?
Who knows what it is? But it's very
obvious that it's selectively applied. So here is
what you're seeing. I said Twitter always adds
a graphic content warning despite no graphic content.
Literally, every time I post this video, the
suppressive label gets applied. Yet anyone else I
see share it does not. Watch and you
will see why it is suppressed by the
Zionist manipulated platform. And I showed the one
where here we could see the the the
warning, and then lo and behold, there it
is. Boom. Appeal this warning, which I did.
They never doesn't matter. And then here's the
thing they send me. Every even the one
that says Twitter always adds. Here it is.
And here's another one. Just make my point.
Simply post to the video underneath
Khaleesi's video where he's talking about the same
things. He's literally describing the same things.
Nothing.
But I post it, hit 19 likes, and
I get a graphic warning. You know? You
get the point. It's very clear what's going
on, and it suppresses
just the reach of the content. It's not
I don't care if it's about me sharing
the content. It's about that video being seen
and getting reached.
Now another another example I wanna share a
bunch about censorship, this has to do with
Telegram.
Another fake account on Telegram is is
pretending to be TLav. It's they got this
TLav underscore 0, and it's pushing all these
crypto scams. This person emailed me saying, hey.
I'm getting hit up on Telegram by somebody
claiming to be you, saying pushing all these
crypto scams and trying to get you to
buy things.
Not me. So just make sure you guys
know that. I would never ever do that.
Frankly, I don't even even my t shirts,
I barely mention. I don't sell anything to
you, and I'm never ever gonna push you
on buying cryptocurrency. That's just not gonna happen.
And LeDuva points out when they're trying to
tag me to make a point about something,
Twitter won't even let them tag my name,
which comes and goes. I've seen it with
Robert myself. It's just all over the place.
Now in a point that we're to get
into the
opening some of the points I wanna share
with you, Brian Mast and this is more
so about the overlapping of kind of Trump's
administration even though this isn't Trump's pick, even
though I'm sure he probably had something to
do with it. Because my point in saying
that is I think there's an interest in
making this current administration just the most obvious
pro Israel Israel first administration I've ever seen.
Brian Mast, I was literally just mentioning him
as, like, the the most obvious example as
a member of the IDF.
A foreign military currently committing genocide in multiple
countries simultaneously.
He just got tapped
to be the house committee to to lead
the house committee on foreign affairs.
I don't know why we anybody out there
that can't recognize what an alarming circumstance that
we're in and how it continues to get
worse, you're you are blinding yourself to this.
I don't care what country it was. If
you have this many people who are clearly
literally in the other military of another country
and you keep seeing it 1 by 1
take positions that will influence the outcome of
policy for that country,
we should be concerned about it.
Brian Mast of all people.
Now another opening note that I wanted to
show you, this is an, this is a
new article, but I have on the archive
so you don't you can read it because
they'll otherwise not let you see it. From
yesterday, Haiti gangs kill more than a 180
mostly elderly people in the capital. The warlord
ordered, you know, the US backed, western backed
warlords,
slaying slum residents.
He said he's suspected of sickening his son
through witchcraft.
It's the kind of people the US government
in the west tends to support when they
don't when the leadership that's currently there or
before this doesn't wanna bow to US interests.
So they'll go find the worst person alive
and pretend that's the better person.
So if you just make sure you recognize
there's a lot of other things going on
in the world, especially while this happens. And
here's an interview I had with Dan Cohen
and Kim Ives about this exact conversation. It's
entitled Haiti's Long History of Western Destabilization and
Dehumanization.
Now, literally, as you have western leaders
murdering people in real time, ask yourself why
they're not talking about that. Ask yourself why
they're not screaming about democracy.
Seeing as how they haven't had an election
in, like, a decade, wonder why they don't
care about that. Right? They'll scream about anything
they want and point to elections that did
take place even with provable examples of how
they are literally, whatever word you wanna use,
democratic.
And then they will undermine it, go after
it. But you have places like this that
they have everything they want in, you know,
destabilized
situation where they can reap all the they
can rob and steal all they want.
And you never hear them go, why is
there not a a an election taking place
over here? Because they don't care.
It's that simple.
Now, lastly, here's an article. I this somebody
mentioned this in the chat about the assassination
attempts. I just thought this was worth pointing
out. This I have it on a screenshot.
For some reason, Fox News won't allow you
to highlight their articles. They have it, like,
as a PDF for some reason. There's so
much weird stuff going on in the corporate
media. It's all about controlling
a lot of things. But either way, the
point is, the house task force investigating
the assassination attempts in general around Donald Trump
are detailing quote preexisting conditions and leadership failures
and so on. Now, it says while the
bipartisan panel was giving was given ample evidence
around the Pennsylvania discussion,
the report suggests request for documents on the
supposed second attempt on his life, the golf
course.
This one at his Palm Beach Golf Course
were seemingly
stonewalled.
Well, that's pretty interesting. Now it could be
a number of reasons why,
but you know what I'm thinking. And it
says, the task force notes that as the
date of publication of the report, the Department
of Homeland Security, the FBI, the the, Circuit
Service,
the,
Bureau of the, what is it, ATF,
have not produced
any,
0 documents
about the the the response to that event.
Now I talked about that one,
And I remember how ridiculous this was, where
this person was, like, a football and a
half or 2 football fields away. They claimed
they saw him through trees. All this and
and I remember the whole point about the
first one where apparently they weren't allowed to
shoot him because they're not supposed to shoot
first. In this case, they shot first. There's
just so many stupid inconsistencies.
I'm a I don't even think this I
I wouldn't be surprised if this didn't even
happen. So my point is whatever actually happened,
the the interesting thing is that they're
this one stood out to me as very,
very interesting how they just were like, another
one. Like, the Joneses of the world just
were screeching about how many attempts there were
when you had no evidence to back it
up. Now they're stonewalling any invest I just
I find that very interesting. So here is
the article title, chump shoots task force chump
shooting task force
haven't produced docs on the golf course incident.
That's just interesting, is it not? Who knows
what that amounts to? You guys can decide
for yourselves. Now, on the point of censorship
and Twitter, since we were talking about that,
you might find this interesting.
You know, file it under the category of
flaming hypocrisy like everything else we're discussing.
Twitter's,
Yacarino, World Economic Forum Yacarino, hired by Elon
Musk, has backed the landmark kids online safety
act.
If you don't know what that is, you
should because it is a backdoor for aggressive
censorship as it has been in the the
online, was it the bill? Like, Child Safety
Act and is that what it's called in
the UK? It's the same thing, guys. Now
look. Everybody wants well, most honest people want
to for kids to be safe. Just, you
know, watch it for cyberbullying, for some kind
of sexual manipulation online, obviously.
The point is that these people will use
what we care about to drive in what
they want. That's always how this works. Now
you can even argue that this kids online
safety act might be something we want. The
the point that I'm making is first, we
can show you how it will 100% lead
to censorship
as designed, but 2,
that they were pushing back on this when
it was happening in the UK.
Typical.
So
the e, the electronic fountain Frontier Foundation says,
don't fall for the latest challenge changes to
the dangerous kids online safety act. Just to
reiterate so to highlight the first point, the
authors of the dangerous kids online safety act
on and remember, this is a this is
the EFF, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a group
that's not that simply
the objective they state is just to fight
for
your privacy and, you know, electronic freedom,
essentially, you know, based on the name, Electronic
Frontier Foundation. The point
is that they're pointing this out as a
problem. Not to say that we don't care
about children's safety, but that they can clearly
see that it's being used to go after,
you know, be able to censor what they
want as we highlighted before.
Now it says that the it's the despite
the new amendments, it's still an unconstitutional
censorship bill that continues to empower state officials
to target services and online content they do
not like.
Now the bill remains a dangerous bill, they
say, that would allow them to decide what
types of information can be shared and read
online by anyone. Now anyone pretending to fight
for free speech should not be okay with
such a bill. Right?
It would still require an enormous number of
websites,
apps, and online platforms to filter and block
legal
and important speech.
Now that we're not talking about pornography or
whatever bullying
point you could make. We're we're talking about
literal
protected speech that falls under what they're pointing
to for your safety, of course, and it's
the same as anywhere else. We have to
draw that line. We can't allow allow them
to scary you know, rile up a story
and then use that to drive you to
call for your own censorship under a guise
of something you actually care about.
Now that you get the point. It's simple.
Now here is what I find interesting.
This is the current article from yesterday.
Twitter's Lindy Accarino backs the bill. Digital ID
privacy fears grow. Now let's cut to the
chase, and I'll read you what they said
next. It's simply pointing out the point.
Twitter, Elon Musk owner Twitter, Elon Twitter's Elon
Musk has recently criticized
Australia.
I thought, well, I thought they also the
like, well, they have clearly criticized the UK
in a 1,000 different ways, one of which
was censorship online, which involves that bill they
passed. But here it is for Australia,
and it is basically the same bill, give
or take a few things. So it's unclear
why Musk and Yacarena aren't aligned on the
issue. Well, I know I think we're all
honest with ourselves. We know why. Because it's
just about a means to an end. If
you think they're fighting for free speech while
censoring you, then maybe you're confused about what
free speech is.
Here's what they said.
And and just to make the point clear,
Elon supports it.
That should always be priority number 1, kids'
safety. He says at Twitter or she says
at Twitter, protecting our children is number 1.
And what's the same thing the UK said?
Same thing Australia said. Funny how you push
back when they did it. As always, she
says, I've said freedom of speech and safety
can and must coexist.
Well, yeah. They're completely different things. Safety has
nothing to do with speech. Speech are words.
Safety has to do with real world action.
You're never at risk because of words. I
don't care what kind of what here's what's
funny about this. That's the woke right overlapping
with the woke left, right there in front
of you. The idea that we have to
be worried about words because that can drive
the danger. That is what they just got
done screaming for a decade, being the woke
the woke left. And now the right is
doing the same thing. Weirdly, not even almost
about Israel right here. Just about dangerous words
under a guise of fighting for something we
all care about, which is children's safety. It
says, when Twitter testified before the Senate Judiciary
Committee last January, we committed to working with
congress on child safety. So, okay, committed to
working with them in this direction, which clearly
is the censorship despite what you may think
about it, has committed and openly admitted to,
acquiescing to over 90% of government requests thus
far. And in their own lawsuit, admitted that
they have
exceeded and met almost everything that GARM was
requesting.
And, by the way, partnered with GARM in
July, and despite the the dissolution of the
format of it, it is still in effect,
as Mike Benz pointed out.
It's so obvious how we're being played. I
just hope people can see it. It says
we've heard the pleas of parents and youth
advocates who seek sensible guardrails.
So
Elon Musk
makes it clear in in this in in
the typical Trump esque way of of an
ambiguous non like, not saying, yes, we should
follow this bill or not. Simply saying, protecting
kids should always be number 1. Well, who's
gonna disagree with that? The point is that
is him not go in agreement
under her comment.
My point is the way they say it
is so maybe tomorrow when something shifts and
the political conversation changes, he can be like,
well, I just think kids should be safe.
I don't like the bill, though. I never
said I did. These are political answers.
The point is, Yaccarino and Twitter are leaning
into it as publicly stated, whatever you think
Elon may say somewhere else. So they are
in line with the large censorship agenda. I
don't know why I have to convince people
of this. It should be obvious by now.
And what scares me the most is that
we are watching this apparatus get built around
us while people are celebrating some kind of
republican victory.
I it it's it's it's crazy how every
single thing that you guys thought you were
fighting
on the left is being rolled out with
a in some cases, not even a different
flavor. Just the same damn thing with a
different person pointing to it. So this is
what terrifies me. Is this is this is
Al Skarp, one of the founders of Palantir.
Alright? Was he a founder or just one
of the current heads up? The point is
he is Palantir along with Teal
and,
Lonsdale and a few others we pointed to
in the past. Now the bottom line is
he's sitting here telling you
about how he thinks the world works,
about how everyone needs to be in fear
that we don't like, and that's how we
all stay safe.
I mean, the fact that that even can
be regarded as some kind of logical statement
is how bad how
far off the track we are. Or just
off I shouldn't say it like like we're
all in the same direction, but just how
far away we are from what
any kind of, like,
whatever society we think we're actually driving toward.
Right? The fact that we're allowing people like
this, these kind of sociopathic
authoritarian
oligarchs
driving us in a direction where they were
I mean, these people are literally showing you
that they think that the world should be
ruled under an iron thumb, that we need
to make sure you're just afraid of what
we do. And if you do anything we
don't like, we're coming. We're gonna destroy your
lives. We're not talking he didn't say legal,
and he's made and I'll go through and
make this explicitly clear in this segment. In
many cases, he says this is what should
be done to people who are protesting Israel.
Let's just be clear. He's a rabidly pro
Israel Zionist. So that's terrifying when they're building
out
a network of surveillance that is dystopian
beyond the meaning of the word.
And these people are tapped right into Donald
Trump's administration, and they are currently building out
a technocratic panopticon around this country in the
world, it would seem.
They're not hiding it, guys. It's literally being
said, but it's being shown under a guise
of fighting for you, building free speech, and
saving the country. And they're all leaning into
this Uber America first idea despite the fact
that everything they're doing is at best the
globalist direction.
If at worst, a literal Zionist overtake.
So I think it's hilarious when you have
all these people screaming about globalism while, like,
like, literally standing on the side of globalism.
So here's what he had to say as
Elon Musk just said based, which I just
just continue to think is a ridiculous thing
to say.
Are
the most loving, god fearing, fair, least discriminatory
people on the planet.
Okay. Let's just start with how what a
silly statement that is.
I mean, are we really gonna pretend like
Americans? Now look. I think that the average
American outside of political influence,
I would argue are large like, this is
my point I've said before about the idea
of they wouldn't pretend to fight for freedom
and and
liberty and good things if they didn't genuinely
believe that's who we were and who what
we wanted. They have no interest in driving
us to think that way because they are
constantly not doing that and constantly get caught
lying about it. They have an interest in
pretending to be that because we want that.
But, objectively, you can see because of what
they've done, a rampantly lawless mindset, might makes
right, you know, whatever we've been talking about
has created a huge portion of people in
this country that are exactly the opposite of
what he's saying. But my point would still
be that we do. I would argue the
majority. But then you comparatively show this to
places in the world, you can first of
all, to say it's the most, objectively, how
in the world could you even know that?
But let's be clear.
That is not how the world is perceived
perceives the US, not because of us, but
because of people like him, because of people
in our government. The technocratic oligarch Zionist influence,
that's what they see if they don't recognize
the difference between government and population. They see
us for what our government does. So that's
not how the world sees us. But sec
the the the other point is to say
that somehow that this makes us worthy of
acting against anybody else because we're better than
everybody else. That's the premise of what he's
saying. But on top of that, there's also
a level of naivety.
He's literally trying to say that because we're
so good, we can't do the good thing
because we get taken advantage of.
It's just such a dark on like,
I almost just wanna say it's not lazy
because it's actually it is just such an
on the surface
effort to get us to lean in to
being worse people, to being a worse,
less moral, less I mean, like, under the
guise that we are that, but we can't
because everyone else is trying to murder us.
How I mean, this is going right back
to the Middle East dynamic. They're all Muslim,
Arab, terrorists, and caves. They all wanna kill
us because of our freedom. Are we really
still playing that? Let's let's recognize that you
have people like Howard Lutnick saying,
damn geehaw. I'm screening. Like, I mean, we're
this is like some old school neocon tap
into some woke mindset. It's crazy what we're
staring at. And then the right bringing it
out, which is hilarious to me.
But just a star on the point to
say that we are the most and just
he's trying to set you up to fail.
Loving, god fearing, fair, least discriminatory
people on the planet. And they wanna know
that if you're waking up and thinking about
harming American citizens or if American citizens are
taken hostage and kept in dungeons
or if you're a foreign power sending Fentanyl
to poison our people,
something really bad is gonna happen to you
and your friends and your cousins and your
bank account and your mistress and whoever was
involved.
Okay. So your cousins, clearly, or anybody connected
to your family, that is what maniacs say.
That is an authoritarian
dictator level comment.
What the hell do the cousins have to
do with anything? And what are you talking
about when you say the the point was
happen to you and your friends
or if you're a farmer thinking about killing
America. Like, do you realize everything he listed
off is what our government does, what the
US government does around the world every single
day, what they're currently doing, what they just
did in Syria, what they're allowing their people
to do to innocent civilians in Syria, which
we'll get to. Like, just think about how
what a comment that is to pretend, like,
we have the right to go around and
kill all of your family if we don't
like what you say. I mean, okay. Let's
just even say they wanted to kill Americans.
There's a crime to be out to to
be highlighted there under international law that you
guys don't care about, but how do we
know that's what they wanted?
Because people like this told us that? Because
our government said they wanna kill us? Do
you know how many people they've said that
about that we know as a matter of
fact is not true? My point is that
he's setting a a table that if we
claim somebody wants to hurt you, we'll go
after every I mean, people are as Elon
said, it's based.
Or the person in the comments say, the
best 2 minutes you'll ever hear in your
life.
This is dangerous stuff where we're watching this
administration and the people that orbit around it
convincing,
in some cases, good people that it's okay
to act this way.
That it's okay to that their lives don't
matter if we just say that they don't
like you or they don't like what you
have or and on top of that, forcing
it on them what we want our lives
to be like or rather what they say
our lives should be like.
This this
is the kind of authoritarian
mindset that we're always trying to highlight, what
they pretend they're fighting around the world. Not
him. He is that, but I'm talking about
the government who these people are controlling.
Our sending fentanyl to poison our people.
Something really bad is gonna happen to you
and your friends and your cousins and your
bank account and your mistress and whoever was
involved.
And, you know, when Americans are spending a
$1,000,000,000,000
on defense, what I what I know, what
what I want, and what I think my
peers want is
why are these people keeping our citizens
hostage,
torturing our Now, obviously, he's only talking about
Gaza. He's talking about Israel, Gaza. He's not
talking about Americans that were in Gaza that
were also there because they were he's only
talking about Israeli Americans. That's it. There's plenty
of Americans that have been killed because they
just happened to be in Gaza. He doesn't
care about them.
Only the Israeli Americans are being kept. Or
he doesn't care about the Palestinians. Tens of
thousands of them held illegally in Israel. He
doesn't care about the in any many other
civilians held in black sites all over the
world by the US government. He doesn't care
about those.
Right? So this is a hypocrite you're staring
at. People attacking our allies, maligning us in
what was once called the United Nations, basically
discriminatory
institution against anything good. Oh, okay. So anything
good, he means Israel. That's it. Because you
realize everybody else is pretty much in line
with highlighting what they're doing is wrong. So
he is clearly outlining this as the US
and Israel against everybody else in the world
as the shining beacon of what's good in
the world.
You know how disgusting that that literally puts
a a disgusting taste in my mouth. Like,
anybody can stand here while we're watching them
murder children and act like they're somehow the
epitome of what's right in the world.
Us in what was once called the United
Nations. Basically, discriminatory
institution against anything good.
And I'm not supporting the United Nations. Let's
be clear about that. The reality is what
he's highlighting is the genocidal character in the
UN being called out for genocide and that
that is maligning anything good. We need to
stand up, and those people need to be
scared. And that's why this conference is so
important because we So just to be clear,
he's talking about the people out there calling
Israel a genocider.
You need to be scared. He wants you
to be scared for pointing that they are
okay with genocide. Have the best products in
the world, and we cannot have parity. Our
adversaries
do not have our moral compunction. If it's
even, they will take advantage of our niceness,
kindness,
our desire to be at home in Nebraska
or New Hampshire or wherever we live. How
gross is that? So you just literally said
everyone else in the world is somehow morally
beneath us, that if we allow them to,
we can't just be good because they'll take
advantage of us.
It it just if you if he actually
doesn't see
that this is what the US government is
doing on our I mean, more than anyone
I've ever looked at in in living memory.
Now you go back before the creation of
the United States. I'm sure there were,
you know, examples of horrifying power structures, people
just marauding groups of power, whatever. But you're
talking about the United States since United States'
creation forward, there is no example in the
world
of more so than what the US government
has done.
Bombing,
destroying,
stealing, violating agreements, rape, torture, murder, destabilization,
you name it. And they're literally,
blindly supporting the most obvious example we've ever
seen.
I just don't know how anybody could take
this seriously, and I'm sure most people don't.
But now realize who we're talking about here.
This is one of the members of Palantir,
a person that is one of the most
powerful people in the world, I would argue,
because of information, because of surveillance. Who are
they who right now, Elon Musk is literally
building out an apparatus of spy satellites with
the NRO with Palantir
to spy on you. And the guy from
the NRO just said in the interview, you
can't hide.
That should be scary especially when people like
this clearly hates you because of your views
on what they're doing.
And our peaceful environments and they need to
wake up scared and go to bed scared.
And if you give that to the American
people, the American cannot have parity. Our adversaries
do not have our moral compunction. If it's
even, they will take advantage of our niceness,
kindness, our desire to be at home in
Nebraska or New Hampshire or wherever we live,
and our peaceful environments, and they need to
wake up scared and go to bed scared,
and if you give that to the American
people, the American people will go back and
say, and honestly, probably shouldn't say this. This
is why I thought the democrats are gonna
lose the election, why they did, because people
want to live in peace. They wanna go
home. They do not wanna hear your woke
pagan ideology.
They they they always this is funny because
these people would lean into whatever I think
works for them. And right now, they're really
trying to tap into what the right wants.
Either way, you just called so we're talking
about keeping them scared.
Okay. Does that apply to the whole country?
Are you somehow aiming this apparatus at the
president alone of a country? No. Because what
he's talking about is a belligerent foreign policy
of aggressive
aggressive, rampant, lawless action against your adversaries, which
means literally anybody, even EU members who suddenly
go afoul of your your direction. We already
saw that or literally anybody who decides to
go against the dollar.
Making them scared, do you realize what it
would take to do that? Whatever you think
that means, the point is that would be
aimed at the country. So you're now making
an entire country of people suffer because you
don't like what they're doing. And I realize,
let's just even take it to the extreme.
You're talking about a country who's actively trying
to murder Americans.
Well, there is a clear
again, as always, a clear
dynamic
of international law to lean into, to go
after them in the way that you claim
the world was supposed to be. By not
doing that, you are just like them. Now
I get it. There's an advantage to not
following those things. The point is if you
wanna be the right what you pretend to
be, then do it the right way. Go
after them and take them out in a
military sense. The bottom line is that's not
what they're doing. They're pointing at other countries
that don't want to bow to what they
demand of them or don't want to give
their resources for nothing, and so they do
this under the guise that they're fighting tear
where they're terrorists all of a sudden because
we covet what they have.
I could promise you this guy knows that.
They wanna know they're safe,
and safe means that the other person is
scared. That's how you make someone safe. Safe
means the other person is scared.
Do you think he really thinks that?
Do you think he really thinks there's no
dynamic in which you can't be safe, that
you can be safe without somebody else being
scared?
I mean, if he actually thinks that, that's
pretty terrifying.
That's a disgusting view of the world. We're
over here fighting for something quite a bit
different that we could call black pilled all
the time. This guy's telling you that the
only way we can be safe if everybody
else is scared, and that's not supposed to
be a blackpilled perspective?
I mean, it's just I I honestly don't
even think he thinks that. I think they're
just trying to drive you into a place
of such belligerence,
such fear of the unknown, of people that
aren't what he says they are, but he
wants you to believe the boogeyman is around
the corner. On top of that, the willingness
to do whatever.
Whatever they say is necessary. Laws be damned
if we say we need it to be
safe. That's an endless,
endless opening.
And the average American person understands this. Unfortunately,
many of the intellectually captured institutions
funneled and
intellectually owned by the Berkeley faculty do not.
And that's what they want, but serves hell
what I want. And that's what Palantir
and all the people in this room, I
hope, were here to serve the American people.
And my version of service is the soldiers
are happier,
the enemies are scared, and Americans go back.
Right. Because all you care about is soldiers
being happy. Right? Is that what we all
want? Are we in just this perpetual state
of war? Well, that's some people, that's their
lives. People have been born and died an
entire lifetime of war.
So he wants you to believe that the
soldiers are happy, then we're then we're good.
This is a military mindset
or rather just a authoritarian mindset. To enjoying
the fact that we're the only one with
the real tech scene in this country and
we're gonna win everything.
That's how I see it. Yuck.
Listen to that response too. Like, oh, like,
it's it's uncomfortable to watch somebody like that.
It's it's creepy. And, of course, he's just
based. That's the best 2 minutes you'll watch
all weekend
because we're right, and we're we're gonna do
what we want, and you'll be because you're
the bad guy.
We're right back in kindergarten, it seems.
I just said, hey. Back on the I
think it was 9th, I just said, hey,
Whitney. Look who's calling for peace through fear.
She's talked quite a bit about these entities.
Now let's talk about what he is in
general.
This is 7 months ago. Palantir CEO, who's
CEO, calls Columbia so we're talking about colleges
here. Now whatever you think about let's be
clear about what happened at these college protests,
specifically Columbia. They were lied about.
It was
overwhelmingly
proven
that these most of these campus protests were
put on by Jewish organizations.
The fact that nobody knows that still or
few people know shows you how crazy this
conversation was.
They were attacked at night. They were throwing
things. The point is there was plenty of
people that responded out of violence and even
maybe acted out of violence. But by and
large,
even according to the police, you can see
that these were Zionist people that were jumping
in and trying to cause violence and trying
to make them out to be something they
weren't. Faking attacks, pretending to be stabbed in
the eye. Police were literally in congress saying
that never happened and people like Stefanik just
kept screaming the lie. Because they have an
a clear interest. All of them are very
clearly, blindly Israel first.
So he says the he he calls the
Colombia anti Israel protest, which, by the way,
were pro Palestinian. They were pro ending the
genocide, which many of them did overlap with
anti Israel. My point, though, is just plenty
of them were there that were saying explicitly,
all we're here to fight for is an
end to the war. Is it? So the
fact that they continue to frame them as
one thing shows you how childish these people
are when it comes to Israel at the
very least. But he says he he calls
the Colombia anti Israel protest pagan
pagan
and says he's dreamed of drone striking his
enemies.
This is the guy that just said he
wants the adversaries to be living in fear.
These people have more power than you could
possibly understand and are probably listening to you
right now. I'm kinda being facetious. My point
is if they wanted to, you I have
to understand how clearly real that is.
And they're building a network of satellites right
now on the or already have for that
matter. We're being told they're doing that with
the with the government.
Now specifically talking about Elon Musk in that
context with Starlink, but realize these things are
all overlapped. And the bottom line is these
are supposed to be the ones fighting the
these are the outsiders
fighting against the deep states. Guys are literally
the deep state.
Max Blumenthal points out, retired general Mark Milley
says the US has committed so many war
crimes over the years, it has no right
to criticize Israel's devastation of Gaza, which is
such a gross argument to make, which that's
that's not how that works.
A crime's a crime. Genocide's genocide. Yes. That's
that's what they do, but you didn't care
about that genocide. Well, yeah. We did actually,
but thank you for admitting you're committing genocide.
But it says Palantir CEO, Alex Karp, chimes
in, the peace activists are actually the war
activists.
Again, they we are the peace activists, that's
what he says. Literally sitting there with military
generals and,
you know, merchants of death and saying that
the people that were protesting to stop the
war are the actual war advocates.
We all get self righteous about what Israel's
doing.
And and I feel horrible Oh, gross. For
the for the innocent people in Gaza that
are dying. But we shouldn't forget No. You
don't, really. That we, United States, innocent people
in Mosul and Raqqa. That we, the United
States,
killed 12,000 innocent French civilians. And here we
are on the 80th anniversary of Normandy. I
mean, what does he think this argument means?
So we didn't it's we were okay doing
that, so we should be okay?
I mean, at best, your argument is we're
both bad.
I I just don't even that that to
me is an act of desperation.
On the prep fires for Normandy, we destroyed
69
Japanese cities,
not including Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
We
Yeah. And you're all war criminals.
Thank you. People
in massive numbers,
innocent people who had nothing to do with
their government. Men, women, and children. God.
This is a terrible thing. But if it's
gonna have meaning, if it's gonna have any
sense of morality,
has to be a political purpose, and it
must be achieved
rapidly.
See see what you just admitted right there?
So we're committing war crimes objectively.
But as long as we give you a
political meaning to it, that way it's moral,
have some semblance of moral meaning. As long
as we go, there's our political outcome, and
we're the good guy, so none of it
matters.
He literally just said that's what we all
see happening.
As long as we point at our outcome
and say we're the good guy, who cares
about the law? Only the law and they've
almost said this explicitly more than once that
these things only apply to you. Right? We
only made the ICC to go after you
guys. We've lost it, man. I mean, this
whole thing has fallen apart. Now that for
all we know, this will
lumber forward for the next 100 years before
anything changes. I sure hope not. But just
realize regardless of how long they can cobble
this together, they've lot people see what they
are. Now it's certainly possible too that they
could conduct a
aggressive long term propaganda campaign and eventually gain
back the narrative. But right now, it's gone.
There there is no way they don't see
that we see who they are. And I
think that's why we're getting like like, for
instance, there was a clip I saw earlier
of Code Pink asking one of these politicians
in the in, like he literally ran away.
Like, literally asked about Israel, and he ran
down the hallway. It's like, that's interesting. I
mean, who knows? I joking and said, maybe
he's gotta pee. But
I I think that they all sense a
little bit. It's I whether we
are overestimating
how clearly
how
close they feel to being held accountable,
we have to realize that even if it
it's closer than I think they've been before,
or we have to just you know, many
of them have ever felt like it's that
possible.
You don't see what I'm saying? Like, so
there must be some level in there that
night going, oh, man. Like, I hope we
don't finally get I I hope so. I
hope they have nightmares about going to prison.
With the least cost and that you do
by speed. And one of the things I've
personally very frustrating,
the peace activists are actually pro war activists,
and we're the peace activists.
So you don't want war, you better be
strong.
You have to scare adversary This is what
I say again. Have to be willing to
Why do you say the peace activists are
war activists? Scarier it's a scarier adversaries. Guys,
this is an archaic mindset. This is a
mindset
they know
guarantees
war. It will never stop. If you're constantly
projecting strength and acting out, you're only going
to cause
chaos.
You don't this is I've said this so
many times.
If a strong person does not need to
scream that they are strong, if you are
constantly trying to project strength, that usually indicates
weakness.
I this is a classic understanding of psychology,
guys. You have to realize that what they're
doing is trying to drive us into this
mindset that simply rationalizes whatever belligerent move they
make.
These are authoritarian
dictators. They are showing you what they want.
They are trying to trick you into blindly
going along with whatever rampantly lawless thing they
do next because we have a moral outcome.
We have an objective that's political. Whatever the
thing, you could add it all together. These
people are not good people.
Because if you're the useful idiot of Iran
and China
begging to literally, there are people on college
campuses saying, be doing a pro
North Korea
mantra.
If you
Who cares what p people have a right
to believe what they want. This is my
point. Your all your entire premise is we
can't allow that.
What was that about free speech again? What
was that about p our rights and the
and our our freedom of thought and freedom
of speech?
The people and realize that they're the lies
about North Korea are just as rampant about
literally everything else. I'm not saying Kim Jong
un is a good person, but real you
don't realize how many lies we've been fed
about that country. So why would they have
to make up so many lies? The reality
is always much different,
And he's not okay with you
deciding to support that or deciding to support
Hamas or deciding to believe in Hezbollah. You
have a right to do that, and he
doesn't want that.
This is the world they're building for you,
and he wants you to be scared. I
think that creates peace. You are literal why
would Hamas ever give up?
They have you marching for them. They're never
gonna give up. Now they're being funded by
Israel, and I'm damn sure he knows that.
This guy is a monster. You are an
infection inside of our society, and they are
the reason they're not gonna give up. Are
you believing what you wanna believe, even if
it's wrong, is an infection in our society?
Do you know how dangerous that rhetoric is?
People on the right are being rabidly
radicalized by people like this. And it's the
same on the left. You see the same
thing. It goes back and forth. Right now,
the right's carrying out that agenda. During COVID,
it was the left. It's all the same
thing. It's your government playing games against you.
Right now, he's getting them so rabidly worked
up against anybody who's trying to highlight the
fact that you're being led into genocide or
you're committing genocide. And on top of that,
you are watching them lay out their globalist
technocratic agenda and you're pretending you're fighting those
things. Think about how embarrassing that is for
somebody who's pretending to be fighting globalism while
literally being on the side of globalism. If
you want to stop these people, you have
to be willing to be fierce. They're out
there supporting a terrorist organization.
No. No. That's you guys in every possible
way. Every single one of you sitting there
are knowingly supporting terrorist organizations
in 15 different ways we could point out.
Not least of which is currently Al Qaeda
in Syria or Hamas, they've funded plenty of
times before that, or the moderate rebels or
any number of groups that we can prove.
Or how about just Saudi Arabia or Israel
at large?
Whose very written charter calls for the death
of all Jews. Nope. Nope. That's a long
time ago. 2017,
it's been changed and explicitly highlights
Zionism.
Now, of course, you could argue they're lying,
but why would they not point that out?
Because they are selectively choosing what to show
you because they are truly clearly trying to
get drive a certain narrative. Now the realization
is that you can show, as we have
many times that and add Clinton's discussion about
rigging the election, mind you, that they were
funding this group into power to keep them
divided. Now since 2006, a lot has changed.
I still argue that there's influence there as
I think we've actually proven.
The point is that things have changed and
they changed their charter. And clearly, you can
prove that these are different. So
they, I think, are aware of that.
Like, explicitly aware of that. I think these
people, especially somebody like Alex Karp, is far
more aware of things like this than most
anybody else.
Think about how gross that is to know
what you're doing and know you're allowing children
to starve to death for your agenda for
Israel. Not just in Israel, worldwide.
I mean, come on now. If you're gonna
support that, you're on the wrong side. The
lar the largest threat to Jews in the
world is Zionism.
The is a is a Zionist just like
Alex Karp sitting right there. Whether he knows
it or not, you can call him stupid
and not aware of that, or you can
call him a monster that's aware of the
fact that Zionism and everything they're doing is
causing the most damaging circumstance for Jews in
the world. I'm gonna get into that segment
in a second.
Now Max continues on to say, general Mill
Millie repeats debunked Israeli propaganda about set beheadings
at the so there's your point right there.
Like, the fact that this guy can still
in May 7th anyway, still continue to push
the lies that were wracked. I'm incredibly debunked
by that point. So is he that they're
there to lie to you. Finally, he points
out that Alex Karp presents the Palestinian solidarity
campus protest movement as an existential threat to
America. So don't forget,
you're adversaries.
So So he's talking in this case, that
would be an American citizen who decides to
recognize that they're committing genocide. Now he wants
you to be scared,
and somebody like that can do that.
Is a often overlooked part of this battle
is we kinda just think these things that
are happening across college campuses especially are like
a sideshow. No. They are the show. Because
if we
lose the intellectual debate, you will not be
able to deploy any army in the west
ever.
What are you talking about?
So now so now if you don't control
what people are thinking and doing in colleges
that we can't deploy military,
I'm not even sure how that connects.
And that that's and and, of course, our
adversary
This it's it's a terrifying thing to see
somebody like this be pushing the idea that
you,
American, watching this show, are the threat,
which is exactly what we've been shelling since
I mean, it wasn't 2016 forward, but that's
where we got really crazy, where it became
no longer that we were just all Americans,
but we had different opinions. But suddenly, you
were the enemy of the country, the inside
secret enemy,
while watching the Israeli inside secret enemy literally
take over everything in front of us.
Here's another example. This is and just to
be clear, it's not some unique thing he
said by accident. He's stressing this opinion in
every show he's on. Primary way to create
peace in this world is to scare our
adversaries when they wake up, when they go
to bed, while they're seeing their mistress. Now
are their adversaries the same as your adversaries?
I wouldn't assume that. That'd be pretty naive
to assume that he's thinking the same thing
you are. Maybe he's thinking about you.
Whatever they're doing, they're scared.
If you wanna have peace in the world
that you ask. That type because that's funny.
Right?
You do it. And that's that is our
peace giving offering this Christmas season to our
adversaries. We're gonna help this government be more
transparent Oh, gross. Work with partnership in America.
And our goal Like, I think you may
be laughing, try to make it seem like
it's more kind of a a joke. It's
not. Is everyone who does not like America,
does not like what we stand for, does
not like the set the the the the
West thinks we're useful idiots is going to
be scared. Okay. So what he's showing you
right there is exactly why people hate this
country or the government, I should say. And
then can sometimes conflate it with the country
because of what he is right there.
He didn't say enemy. He just if you
disagree. Listen again.
Ship in America, and our goal is everyone
who does not like America, does not like
what we stand for, does not like the
set the
the the the west. Okay. So anybody doesn't
like the west has to be scared.
Why is that? Can we not have a
disagreement? Or is it now that we're all
friends and happy or immediately enemy, we're gonna
kill you? Well, that's the world they're creating.
There's no middle ground there. Right? We can't
just have a disagreement. We can't decide, no,
we don't want to fund that project. Or
no. Too bad. Now you're the enemy. We're
gonna kill you because you're the enemy. You
can't have a disagreement. Or you're challenging our
interest. That's how they act.
You don't like what we wanna do? Fine.
We're gonna regime change you and put monsters
in your place and act like you were
the bad guy.
That's what they're talking about. Now he's simply
saying if you don't like this country, you
should be scared. Why is that that is
why people hate what they are.
That is not the way the world is
supposed to exist. The idea that you simply
are are not on the same page, therefore,
we're gonna make you an adversary as opposed
to simply having a difference of opinion and
trying to find common ground.
Now what's funny is people like this act
like that's naive. Act like what we're trying
to talk they're driving you into a world
that is a dystopian reality so they can
easily
more easily control it. Whether that's the objective,
like, like,
a, what's the word? A conscious point, like,
they're aware that's the case or not, but
that's what's happening.
If they if they drive you into a
place where these things where we're in a
situation where everyone ever wants to kill you
and everyone's fighting each other, well, that they
are in absolute control all the time.
WikiLeaks points out you and this is the
same clip here.
He he ref WikiLeaks references what Arnaud Betrayan
has to say.
Dane he says the US tech leaders have
dangerously lost the plot.
He says, perfect illustration that US tech leaders
have dangerously lost the plot. Not only does
Karp not seem to understand the first thing
about geopolitics, he doesn't even understand what made
US successful. He claims that the only way
for the US to be safe is for
their adversaries to wake up scared and go
to bed scared, which by the way is
kinda my point is that would drive more
action. Like, so if their point is that
these people wanna kill you because of your
freedom, they don't. That's never been the case.
They don't wanna kill you because of your
freedom. They wanna kill something because your government
did things to them. In this case, if
they're waking up going to bed scared, how
do you think that's gonna roll out? It's
gonna end up in your face.
By design, so they can then justify more
action to keep you safe in quotes.
They've written policy about this, or rather, you
know, documents and think tank conversation about how
they can keep you in a state of
fear to keep you in control. We've talked
about this over the years. It says the
US should go collect to to do collective
punishment. Threatening, that's what I was saying is
that means everybody in the country would be
scared.
Threatening not just adversaries, but their friends, cousins,
mistresses, and whoever was involved. The US cannot
have a party, a parody with adversaries because
our adversaries do not have our moral compunction.
It's e if it's even, they will take
advantage of our niceness, our kindness, which in
in actually shows you the opposite with what
he just said. International institutions such as the
UN are discriminatory against anything good. He goes
in short, this is imperial hubris.
It is most deluded and hypocritical.
Karp simultaneously
claims American moral superiority while advocating deeply immoral
tactics like collective punishment, making everyone else live
in fear and rejecting any checks on its
power. It's a world view that mistakes bullying
for leadership.
That's exactly what Trump is rolling forward. And
domination for security.
And which by and which, by the way,
betrays Americans' own historical lessons as a former
British colony.
And most importantly, it's dead wrong. The world
absolutely doesn't work this way. Rule by fear
has a long and very well documented history
of failure. It's exactly what I'm saying in
far more clumsy way. Empires that rely on
fear and domination
always
sow the seeds of their own demise because
fear always generates resistance and resentment, which my
point was, I think that's actually the point.
I think if you manufacture
this never ending bread, you create a situation
for you to fill the gap, for you
to always be the one keeping everyone safe
from the enemy. It's the war on terror.
Let's not forget, I think we should see
by now, they created the thing they fought
or didn't fight. They created what they claimed
to fight, and then they aimed all those
weapons at you.
It says, this is, by the way, exactly
what's happening now. As explained by none other
than former national security adviser, Sabik Nubrzinski.
Right? The in front of the seventies, the
original mind, mastermind of the plan to balkanize
Afghanistan,
the Middle East, which is exactly what has
carried out since, but the but this is
the Israeli plan.
In his book, The Grand Chess Board, in
which he wrote that the most dangerous scenario
for the US would be, quote, an alliance
of the aggrieved.
The most dangerous scenario would be a grand
coalition of China, Russia, and perhaps Iran, an
anti heg hegemonic
hegemonic
coalition united not by ideology, but by com
complementary grievances.
So what's interesting is you have to realize
that if he's framing it like that, it
means at the very least then, they were
aware
that what they were doing
was
in like, against
hegemony.
That doesn't mean that they're not necessarily seeking
call all con control and power, but it's
very it's kinda like the multipolar versus this.
There's always a way it could lead to
control, but I think it's interesting to point
that he recognized that they were not what
they were framing them as. And it says
that's what rule through fear and intimidation gets
you. It unlocks the most dangerous scenario for
the US because guess what? Turns out people
don't particularly enjoy being bullied and threatened. They
tend to band together against the bully regardless
of their differences.
What made America truly successful wasn't its ability
to frighten others. And thinking about it right
now, it really does show a level of
of concern.
Like, they're afraid of you.
Desperation seems to be everywhere.
It was its ability largely lost today to
build that made this country successful. The Marshall
Plan, the internal national institutions, cultural exchange, industrial
might, technological innovation. These were the real sources
of American power. It says, how did the
US, quote, win the Cold War? Well, let's
turn to another actually smart American statesman, George
Kennan, the architect of the US Cold War
strategy. Key to this strategy was, in his
words, proving that the US was coping successfully
with the problems of its internal life and
with the responsibilities of a world power. Now
this is not to get into much more
deeper
realities of what was going on during the
Cold War. It says this meant creating a
society and an international order that inspired
admiration rather than fear. 1 that nations
would be inspired by rather than be coerced
into.
This is precisely why Gorbachev, for better or
worse, ultimately pushed for reform. He recognized the
clear success of the American economic and technological
model compared to Soviet stagnation. Now whether you
think will agree with that or not, the
point is the way it's perceived.
It says he was convinced by US achievements,
not intimidated by threats. Most tellingly, this tech
CEO seems completely disconnected from today's tech reality.
His claim that the US is, quote, the
only one with real tech seen is peak
delusion.
And I've said this so I mean, tech
Iran is wildly technologically advanced. It says China
has now overtaken the US in innovation and
scientific discoveries according to almost all credible rankings.
They'll never admit that, of course. It says
all in
all in all, Karp's may make them afraid
rhetoric reveals a profound insecurity. It's exactly how
I read it too. A tacit admission that
America
can no longer compete on the basis of
positive achievements. When he dismissed international institutions and
advocates for rule by fear, he's essentially admitting
that America can no longer lead by example
or build constructive alternatives,
if they ever could lead by example. Now
I'm talking about the government.
All that's left is the threat of force.
It also reveals something about the current state
of American tech leadership. When tech CEOs start
sounding like cold war hawks advocating for global
domination through fear rather than innovation through building,
it suggests they've run out of ideas.
I would argue it's it it reveals that
they're not actually tech.
See,
innovative tech. What do you call them? Tech
leadership.
It's this is this is technocracy. This this
is your leadership
coming back out of the shadows.
I, we could look at it where, you
know, whether that's the people chosen to or
maybe people pulling those strings behind them. That's
my opinion. That this is ultimately a shift
of power that you're watching take place in
front of you. And that we've never really
been confronted with the true people that were
making decisions this entire time.
It says they're no longer confident in their
ability to compete on the merit of their
products and solutions. To conclude, Karp's worldview isn't
just dead wrong. It represents everything that's gone
awry with American leadership. The abandonment of building
for bullying, of influence for intimidation,
of power for control, of the triumph of
worst instincts over thoughtful judgment.
Right? I mean, it's what I keep talking
I mean, he's just this is so eloquent
the way he describes this. What I keep
seeing in what Trump's building, whether you think
it's Trump I I think it's just your
government and he's the one chosen to roll
it out. It's very clearly what he's highlighting
here. Abandoned
abandonment building for bullying. Influence for abandoning influence
for intimidation.
Of power for control. The triumph of worst
instincts over thoughtful judgment. And of course, the
point being that thoughtful judgment, oh, that's a
woke lefty thing. You're you're just a weak
person. No. That's being a human being
and not trying to make it all about
influence versus intimidation.
Right? I really want us to think about
that. It's about a middle ground of all
of it.
When necessary, sure. There needs to be some
action. The point though is that in every
other possibility because we know where these things
lead to, we shouldn't be leading with violence,
leading with threats and fear intimidation. Because what
does that lead
to? Your family being killed,
lives being taken,
which they don't care about because it's not
their families, and it's not their lives. Never
is.
When America elevates leaders like Karp who preach
fear over building, we're not witnessing the restoration
of American greatness as many of the comments
below claim. We're watching its erosion in real
time. A nation that can only threaten rather
than inspire has already lost its claim to
leadership. Very well said.
As Corey Diggs points out,
are people paying attention yet? They couldn't be
more transparent.
Musk cries about something that needs fixing.
Everyone shares them on playing right into his
hand. He then shares posts tied to Palantir
and others who will fix it in quotes.
Everyone cheers him on. Hello?
The point is, this is another example of
Palantir crew sitting around talking about how they're
gonna change and fix everything. And And all
he writes is the government is more broken
than you could possibly imagine.
It's the same thing as always.
Everyone's been we've been saying that for 30
years.
Point is they're now pointing at it because
they want you to look at it because
they're trying to show you what they've destroyed
for their benefit to roll in the next
control structure. And this simply says Joe Lonsdale
of Palantir says people don't realize just how
broken the bureaucracy
is. You're all you're all a part of
it. All of you. Every single one of
you. Think of the worst company you know
in Silicon Valley that went bankrupt 30 years
ago and imagine someone just kept pumping money
into it. Yeah. That's the government. That's corporate
media. That's half of the projects that were
being driven to to support because it's in
the interest
of US hegemony.
These people are driving in a control structure
and want you to think they're somehow repairing
the country. They're gonna use these kind of
people, the idea of artificial intelligence and surveillance
as the idea of how we're going to
make things more efficient, and far too many
Republicans will sleepwalk right into it. This is
the same Palantir, by the way, who is
right this moment committing genocide. Not just supporting
genocide, actively playing a leading role in how
they murder children.
Tiel's Palantir and Karp's Palantir,
they in a strategic partnership for Israel.
K? This was January 2024.
It's been a year that they have been
committing genocide
in Israel.
And it shouldn't be surprising because they support
it.
Now here's Pelham pointing out,
what was I forget his name again.
I think it says it in there. James
Bamford
speaking on Alex Karp
and the overlap with Israel and the support
for the unit 82100
IDF Institution
or Group.
An equivalent of the NSA is called unit
82100.
They're very,
sophisticated. It's basically the same type of organization
as the,
NSA.
And, Palantir is one of the companies that's
given,
it's an American company. It's based in Denver,
and it,
has given an enormous amount of
assistance to unit 8200
in terms of targeting.
And that goes to the,
the military. So the military targets
civilians, lots of civilians. Most of the people
killed were civilians. Women and children have been
the people who have been targeted in in,
the occupied territories in Gaza. So the
NSA gives
Unit 8200
an enormous amount of
data from what it collects.
When I interviewed Ed Snowden back in Moscow
after he
went to Moscow,
taking all the data from from NSA, he
said that was one of the worst offenses
he saw when he was at NSA, that
they were giving all this American data,
Palestinians
talking overseas to,
relatives or friends in in Palestine and the
occupied territory.
And NSA was giving that data to
to, unit 82100. So you have unit 82100
that's collecting
a lot of data from the United States,
from Americans.
They're using it for targeting, and Palatir is
one of the companies that's
enormously sophisticated in terms of targeting.
So what the the problem is here is
that you're getting,
information from the United States that the Israelis
are using to target
the civilians
in in Gaza,
and there's been
33,000
killed now. It's just an enormous problem that
the US has got to stop,
supplying all this
data and the, the
So Palantir being a central part there. As
Pelham points out, his company Palantir is selling
this information to unit a 300 so they
can target civilians in Gaza.
So let's not forget, guys. An Israeli platform
has broken the story more than once. 972
magazine,
a mass assassination factory inside Israel's calculated bombing
of Gaza using an artificial intelligence program they
call habsura,
which would target specific buildings. Now this was
called Lavender. This is another part they they
did to follow-up on it. Lavender is a
different AI program. The AI machine directing Israel's
bombing spree in Gaza where they would focus
on specific individuals.
All of this is being facilitated using Palantir.
Here he is speaking about how
as a very quick clip, I'll play it
real quick. It's very quiet. So I'll just
say it if you can hear it properly.
Touching American, we are going to make you
and your friends life happier. American, we are
going to make you and your friends life
happier.
American,
we are going to make you and your
friend's life hell. You touch an American, we
are going to make you and your friend's
life hell.
So he says, if you touch an American,
we will make you and your friend's life
hell.
Okay. So, again, with this point, this broad
collective punishment point where so your friends too,
we're just gonna kill all your friends if
you do something against us. I can't even
believe people aren't screaming about what a terrible
thing this like, this person is normalizing
the exact thing we've always pretended we're fighting.
But now because Israel's doing it and has
normalized the murder of children because we claim
we're going after a bad guy that turns
out to be there, so no big deal
though.
You're you're you're literally pretending it's okay to
do things like this. And he support realize
not just do making that okay to other
people's minds, but that we can see that
you don't care.
Now maybe it's not every children anywhere, but
clearly, selectively that you don't care about Palestinian
children. So you're a disgusting human being, bottom
line.
And here's the point, though. How this is
just one one example.
New York Times. This is as of
the 7th 14th September this year. New York
Times reports that there were
no US officials at the funeral of Anzur
Yigi, the US citizen who was killed by
Israeli forces in the occupied West Bank last
week. This is in September.
There's there's plenty of examples. There are simply
there's American Palestinians that were killed and are
still in Gaza. There are just Americans, not
even Palestinian Americans, which it shouldn't make any
difference. They're all human beings that were in
Gaza post October 7th that have been, there's
an entire article written by, I think, NPR.
Hey. Where why are where's our government? No
one's coming to help us. You know what?
They don't care. Apparently, they only care if
it's an Israeli American in the conversation.
Now you can be all upset about that
and call me racist. You show me I'm
wrong.
Endless amounts of people in our government have
been screaming about only when there's an Israeli
American who's captured, killed, or talked about. I
can show you how many times I've posted,
how many times they've been asked about Americans
in Gaza. Over 600 post October 7th that
were trapped when they shut everything down and
wouldn't let everybody leave.
So he apparently doesn't care about if an
American he's thinking about something else, but he
wants you to think that. That's for sure.
It's pretty scary.
So here's Palantir simply posting this on October
7th. Palantir remembers October 7th. We stand with
Israel.
Well, at that point, we didn't really know
actually what happened.
Now, what you're saying there is you stand
with your government murdering your own people to
execute whatever it was they were trying to
accomplish. You guys can decide for yourselves
or funding the group that later does all
of this. So it however whatever point you
wanna start at, it's all because of Israel.
So that's pretty easy to see. And, again,
you can be all outraged and upset about
that, but it's objectively obvious. Even Israel's own
media has begun has continued to highlight the
fact that they ordered the Hannibal directive, that
Hamas was funded long before this and right
up until October 7th by Israel.
These things all matter.
On top of that, this one is from
February 16th this year.
He says I'll I'll just play the clip.
He's talking about the AI weapons, and who
controls them controls the world order. So I
guess he's talking about himself.
But they are, at the end,
weapons,
technologies that will define who controls the world
order, and I'm very, very in favor of
that world order being controlled by the west,
primarily by America and its allies. That doesn't
mean that we should be xenophobic
or, or engage Well, he's murdering children in
Gaza. Engage in in bigotry, certainly not in
America. One of the core things we have
to avoid in the west is anything that
even smacks of something that's xenophobic.
That's weird.
Xenophobic.
One of the core things we have to
avoid in the West is any That was
weird. Doesn't mean that we should be xenophobic
or
Hold on. Something weird just happened right there.
No.
But they are, at the end,
weapons,
technologies that will define who controls the world
order. And I'm very, very in favor of
that world order being controlled by the west,
primarily by America and its allies. That doesn't
mean that we should be xenophobic
or,
or engage in in bigotry, certainly not in
America. And one of the core things we
have to avoid in the west is anything
that even smacks of something that's xenophobic.
How is it? That's so strange.
That doesn't mean that we should be xenophobic
or,
or engage in in bigotry, certainly not in
America. Yeah. That is strange. By the way,
if you can't can you see the bar?
That's just it keeps cutting off the latter
half of the video, and then I I
pull it back and it starts at the
beginning. Anyway, that that's very strange.
So much weird stuff going on today. Well,
there was a part in there that I
wanted you to hear, but I guess that's
technocratically not available.
So the point
is will the AI will define who controls
the world order, which I guess is just
what we're accepting as the way it goes.
Right? Right. Yeah. Let's like, it's important to
write well, I'll I'll say it in a
second actually as it write,
oh, it is coming up next. That support
it's important to remember
in this context where they got the name
for it. And really think about why they
would choose this name, not just because it's
surveillance and and information.
It's something evil in the context of how
it was written. But the point is that
why we would just accept the idea that
we're just there's an an entity that controls
world order? How about we don't want that?
How about we don't want there to be
one entity? And they're they're arguably that's the
way it has to be. Well, I disagree.
I think what's important to recognize that these
people are constantly driving you in a direction
that necessitates their utter control over your life.
I think there's a world that doesn't have
to have that. Doesn't doesn't have to necessitate
their overlords controlling your life. And I think
we all know that. But there we're in
this time where even like with the voting
dynamic before the election where the adults, you
know, give up their principles when you tell
us to, it's amazing what they're framing as
what the right what the smart adult would
do. When when you stand back and look
at it, it's pretty much follow along with
whatever they tell you that day and ignore
your principles and act like an authoritarian monster
because we're the right one. Like, pretty sure
that's not what we were taught when we
were growing up, but I think you guys
get the point. Well, here oh, and if
you just wanna scroll through the rest of
their their their I just searched for Israel
on Palantir. And, you know, you'll find what
you might expect. It's an honor to meet
with the president. Like, realize, this is January
10, 2024.
So objectively, the world's acknowledged they're committing genocide.
The ICJ, the ICC, and here they are
meeting with them. There's there's Steele and Karp
meeting with the president of a genocidal state,
who, by the way, should be arrested.
I just think that's very crazy. This is
not about, like, my opinion. Like, realize how
wild it is. We're at a point right
now, we'll show in a second, where these
people are
are are they should be under arrest by
anybody in line with these groups. And now,
I think it was Gallant Gallant or Gantz,
one of them just came to the United
States. I'll show you in a second. No
big deal. Brett McGurk, meeting with him. No
big deal.
I just it's just so transparent. These people
are not what they pretend to be. These
are the villains.
Smart Business Insider.
This is where this name comes from.
Secretive data company
2020.
It it says Palantir just officially revealed its
plans to go public.
What's this is 2020.
Interesting timing. Here's why it it's named after
an all powerful seeing stone of Lord of
the Rings. Now the bottom line is it's
it's a it's a a fictional thing. Right?
But it is it is a
inherently evil concept, and it's something that was
created by a a the epitome of evil
in the conversation of Lord of the Rings.
I won't I'll I'll avoid the names for
not fuse anybody.
The point is that you have a wizard
in this context that is using it in
the Lord of the Rings, and he gets
completely overtaken by evil because of its use.
And the whole point is about its ability
to get information
and to spy on everybody.
Why would you choose that? Why would you
choose an evil content an evil symbol that
was designed to secretly spy on people for
a company that was supposed to be about
at least at least
on the front of it, something positive for
everybody.
Yeah. I think you know why. 1 of
the story's villains, the wizard Saruman,
uses a Palantir to surveil his enemies. The
stone's power and limitless knowledge corrupt Saruman and
allow him to be manipulated leading to his
downfall. Sauron being the the main main evil
villain.
The bottom line though is that it's very
interesting to pick something like that. It gives
you insight into what their minds are like.
I mean, you could argue it's just a
fun thing they pick because it's about something
that you can see into, but look at
the way it's developing.
You're literally doing this to help them murder
children in Gaza. Whether you realize you wanna
say that or not, it's the case. On
top of that, it's being used to roll
out a and already is a pretty pretty
much a surveillance panopticon
of this country, of the world for that
matter. It's being used in a very much
alarming, technocratic control structure type of ways. So,
I guess they pick the name wisely.
And I'll include some articles around this concept
the conversation. This is from 2018.
Palantir, the PayPal offshoot becomes a weapon in
the war against whistleblowers and WikiLeaks.
This is well before where we are now,
still the same problem. Derek just recently wrote
about the they're one part of this. This
is from November 30th.
Meet the spyware companies preparing to unleash their
tech during Trump's second term, and this is
simply talking about the exact same idea.
And and not just the idea of the
Palantir overlap or all the different surveillance companies
they're gonna roll to build this Panopticon,
but that the vast majority of them are
Israeli spyware tech terms tech firms.
And 50% almost of the entire market of
spyware is Israeli start up companies. And we
recently talked about the information that came from
their own statements where they
they admit
that most of these companies still act in
the explicit interest of the Israeli government.
They've talked openly, say this in interviews, except
when you say it, apparently, you're racist.
Now remember, Trump is rolling out the idea
of his mass deportation using military assets and
then declaring a national emergency. My point is
that that is what is gonna open the
door to begin the full rollout of exactly
what we just talked about.
Bio, digital, everything.
And here's what Derek was just covering, and
this is what I was referencing earlier.
The national the US National Reconnaissance Office, which
apparently is one of the most shadowy shadowy
entities in the conversation, which provides surveillance for
even groups like the NSA.
Elon Musk and SpaceX are working with them
to build out exactly what you're looking at.
An all encompassing spy surveillance network
that they say
that you can't hide from.
That's his quote.
I don't know why we think that's okay.
Just how about you just pretend it's Hillary
Clinton doing it so we can all just
move past this fake time or we pretend
like it's a good thing?
Now to start into the conversation about Zionism,
I wanted to make a point about this
before we get into the larger point about
what's being done. And I thought it was
important to start with that, to show you
the
tech surveillance side of this, which is another
tendril of what Israel's Zionist agenda is carrying
out through the United States. But I want
you to recognize again that the shifting dynamic
of all this and a lot of things
a lot of reasons why I think this
is
why there's why there's such a element of
desperation to this? Time.
Almost likely I need to brush this forward.
I mean, I think they're losing influence every
moment.
Zachary Foster, who we've interviewed more than once,
he's got a PhD in Palestinian history from
Princeton,
he highlights an important clip here. And this
is what I'm talking about. I could I
could do an entire show. I mean, you
guys have seen me highlight little parts of
this for a long time now. I could
probably do an entire multiple hour show just
about this content. Maybe I should one day.
The point being is that you can see
around the world that there's a rapidly evolving
discussion around what Zionism
is,
what Judaism is,
and what and how they both come to
how they intersect.
As he says in this clip, this person's
name is Peter Beinart,
Beinart,
says that most of the, quote, organized American
Jewish community has abandoned Judaism and instead practice
a different religion.
He says, quote, in Judaism, human beings are
created in the image of God, and so
nothing should be elevated
above human beings
who are considered to have an infinite value.
What Zionism has done
what the state of Israel has done, has
led to many of them and the organized
American Jewish community to elevate
the state
above the absolute value of human beings. We're
watching that play out right now. Take a
listen.
Human beings are created in the image of
God, and so nothing should be elevated above
human beings who are considered to have of
infinite
infinite value. Right? And it seems to me
what Zionism has done, what the state of
Israel has done, it is that it's led
many
people in the organized American Jewish community to
elevate this state
above
the absolute value of the human beings who
live within this state. Right?
More than half of whom are Palestinian.
Right? Who are also created in the image
of God. Right? And so that to me
is an act of idolatry because, you know,
Heschel said that there's only one thing that's
created in the image of God, right,
is is the human being.
And to act as if anything else is
sacred
or sacrosanct
is to turn it into an idol and
to be practicing idolatry. Right? And so when
people
and and you see this in this phrase,
does Israel have a right to exist? Again
and again and again, people say Israel. I
think the answer this is something that Yeshayahu
Labovitz, who I quote a lot of my
book, the the the Israeli philosopher said,
absolutely not.
No state has a right to exist.
Human beings have rights. States
are just instruments.
They are instruments for the protection of human
life and human flourishing and human dignity,
and their legitimacy is entirely based on how
good a job they do in protecting the
rights and dignity of life of the people.
Very
interesting. And look, as we've seen this from
I what is it? What Citizens United or
any number of other things in the past,
turning
corporations into people,
which has been a long term agenda. And
not not just in that one point, but,
like, an agenda involving a lot of different
things, including
just the,
I mean, it gets into a whole
bee's nest of of or what what's the
term? Is that I think bee's nest is
the term. It's it's there's a lot of
different directions to go in around I mean,
it interjects with things like the sovereign citizen
conversation. The point
is that clearly,
it's illegitimate
to create the illusion that companies or governments
or states are people then creates the idea
that they have, you know, the right to
free speech. It it it creates a way
to keep them protected from you, which is
the exact opposite of how it should be.
So I really think that's important to think
about. And on top of that, what he's
really highlighting
as he writes is that ultimately within,
specifically, Zionism, it's created this situation where they've
they rise above
they they raise up the state of Israel.
And,
what what else did he say right there?
The
Zion is they they elevate the state.
I guess that's all he said. I thought
he said something else. Let's just elevate the
state above it, which is exactly what we're
seeing. And I think really it comes down
to, like, the actual idea of Zionism above
Judaism,
which is actually what the point is. And
you can see it everywhere you look.
So Zachary is simply pointing out that this
is a changing conversation.
Now here's an older example I've shown you
of this, and it's just crazy to me.
This kind of thing is pretty prevalent when
it comes to places like Israel. And that
should if this if this it should shock
you, but it mean it shouldn't since we
show this kind of stuff all the time.
But I guess I should say it only
should shock you if you don't realize that
this if you're believing a lie, essentially. So
what you're gonna see here is a a
old Zionist Israeli woman
who walks by a bunch of Orthodox Jews
who are not who disagree with Zionism, who
don't who actively advocate that Zionism is a
is
is the antithesis of Judaism.
And she walks by and says something very
specific to them that'll probably shock you if
you haven't heard of.
So she she says it like 2 more
times, by the way. But in case you
can't hear it, it gets louder as she
goes. She walks by them and she says,
Hitler made one big mistake.
She should have put you in gas chambers.
That's what she says.
She says too bad, walks to the next
guy. Says the same thing. Hitler made a
mistake. You should have been in the gas
chamber.
Too bad.
But we're here, and you're calling She
says, but we're here, and you're gonna go
to hell because they don't like Zionism?
So
if it's not clear already,
Zionism
is the point to her. Zionism is the
religion to her. Even if she's thinking Judaism,
the moment they point that Zionism is a
problem,
she says they're going to hell. Even though
to a t, they're orthodox Jews.
So if it was really about Judaism, they
should be on the same they should be
like, well, we both agree.
I'm I'm absolutely living to a t my
faith of Judaism. I don't think Zionism overlaps
with it. So they could disagree about that,
but to say that she goes, so why
would he go to hell if they both
believe because she doesn't she believes Zionism. She
believes what he was just saying. An completely
different thing that's now risen above all of
it. And is so far out of her
mind about this that she's willing to say
that Hitler was right,
or rather, what did she say? Hitler made
one mistake.
One mistake?
So
killing all the Jew the Jews they killed
wasn't a mistake? The only one mistake was
killing them? I mean, of course, you could
just call it a language. She just said
it in a stupid way. But either way,
guys, that is outrageous.
They walk away smiling.
I mean, that's just crazy to me. Like,
that's a disgusting person. I don't care what
kind of excuse you make. Anyone in any
context that would make that kind of a
statement to somebody who, by the way, shares
their, at least, same stated religion,
and all they're doing is having a disagreement
about a political ideology and that's your response,
you're a disgusting person. Like, you are the
problem. You're the villain.
You have become you've dehumanized yourself.
That's toward Judaism that who speak who's posting
that. So the point is you're gonna see
this a lot in the conversation. Here's another
example. And this is not to support any
of the call the members of political station.
This person simply says, I'm joining senator Sanders.
This is senator Welch, apparently, and Merkley and
Van Holland to urge our colleagues to vote
with us to block the sale of offensive
weapons to Israel. Why? Because they're objectively committing
genocide. Now look. Even if you disagree with
the word genocide, if you're actually of the
mind that you're if you're actually pretending
that they're not committing crimes,
because that's this weird game right now where
they're, like, debating about genocide
and then acting as if we can't meet
the definition of genocide, therefore there's nothing happening.
It's like, comes a huge chasm between nothing
and genocide.
Obviously, war crimes are being committed. Like, if
you're debating about whether it's genocide, you you
almost have to admit that war crimes are
being committed. But that's how broken this whole
thing is.
So the point is, they're going, let's not
send weapons to a group committing war crimes.
Whatever you think of their intentions, I don't
believe they're genuine. If they I should they
would have said it a long time ago.
But this person says or this person's name
is Jalen Givens.
Says 4 Jew haters with zero shame.
Bernie Sanders is very Jewish. He says, what
a disgrace to the US senate. Only the
Democrat party would produce such vile people. Think
about how wild that is. So he's no
longer Jewish because he doesn't wanna support Zionist
killing children
or doesn't wanna wants you to think that's
what he thinks?
I just think it's incredible.
And Blakely down here who is also a
Jewish person says Bernie is Jewish, you idiot
toilet sheet. The point is they know that.
They don't they they're I'm telling you, the
reality of it is that they
reality of it is that they're you're no
longer Jewish if you challenge Zionism, which shows
you that it's only about Zionism. Ben Shapiro,
I've shown you many times, which, by the
way, this account that he was
supporting
has now been suspended, which shows you they
clearly cross some kind of a line apparently.
And imagine if they're crossing a line, it
gets them censored when they're pro Israel, you
kinda think you know where that's going.
But he was simply highlighting that these were
a bunch of people there was Jewish voices
for peace. That was the the group that
was protesting in the capital. They were sitting
cross legged
and and chanting
and and the genocide or something like that.
I remember I something exactly. It was they
were sitting cross legged chanting something. It was
about ending what was going on. I remembered
it very clearly. And he says, useful idiots
for Hamas. Plus, these trash people don't know
how to wear a talent. So now not
only are they trash,
even though they're Jewish people who you pretend
that you're my point is that you're now
they're they're trash idiots for Hamas if they
simply disagree with Israel's war. So is it
really about their religion?
Clearly not. Ben Shapiro was a rabid Zionist
who was supporting a genocide. I think that
should be clear by now. Here's another example.
So Tom Cotton simply said senate Democrats are
trying to cut off military aided Israel
during a war. No. They're trying to stop
a genocide.
Tom Cotton is another rabid Zionist.
And I simply posted that video that also
got a graphic warning, like, literally every other
time and said almost exclusively children, says this
Jewish doctor to who was killed by the
IDF in Gaza, which Tom doesn't care about.
Tom is probably cheering on the death of
children,
who to this person whose name is I
am,
Amy Israel Chai,
says or or am Israel Chai,
says he's not a Jew. He's a liar.
Alright. Okay. So this Jewish doctor, who is
very Jewish,
says that they're killing people, so now he's
no long no longer Jewish. Did he stop
practicing the faith? No. No. He still practices
his faith. But if he says that they're
doing something wrong, then he's not Jewish. Oh,
I see. So it's only about your support
for Israel in this context. Got it. That's
not Judaism. Guys, these people are not Judaism.
They are Zionist monsters who are supporting an
Israel genocide. And if you go against it,
you're no longer Jewish. I think that speak
for itself.
This person post what this Jewish person said.
I'll show you this in a second. And
they said again, she's not a real Jew.
Here she is. You can look at her
account.
Haley's professes to be a Jewish person. She
says in the last 4 weeks, no one
has made me, an American Jew, feel unsafe.
This is November 11th, so about a month
after October 7th. No one has talked about
wanting me dead. No one has tried to
dehumanize me. No one has sent me violent
messages. No one has tried to threaten my
livelihood and my family except for American pro
Israel Jews.
Hope you can hear that.
A Jewish American person saying the only people
making her feel unsafe are pro
are American pro Israel Jews.
She's like, I grew up fairly observant, and
I love Judaism and being Jewish. I was
lucky not to be steeped in Zionism.
I have been appalled my whole life by
the way Israel demands nationalistic allegiance to a
spiritual concept.
Judaism is not nationalism.
Your own Jewishness does not require patriotism and
flag waving. You are you are whole and
complete without it. This drives them crazy.
No one ever needs to die in order
for us to live.
Avri, Gorat,
it says transgression will give rise to more
transgression. October 7th was a nightmare. It was
answered with, obliteration.
There is no god in the sniper's gun.
There is no righteousness in hellfire rockets. Every
person on earth, every baby, every middle aged
man, every elderly woman deserves peace. So there's
a real Jewish person. There's a real religious
person.
There is no purpose to our lives if
not to liberate one another.
And what whatever religion, you're that is a
good person. That's a person who cares about
human life and respects it.
And
this Zionist says, that's not a real Jew.
Why? Because she calls out what they're doing.
I I mean, I don't even explain it.
It's very, very clear.
And this was on,
Blue Sky platform, by the way.
Same quote, by the way. This person posts
another statement and this another non Jew
telling us what Zionism is. Okay. And I
said, well, here is a Jewish person, a
very highly respected Jewish academic, Avi shlemm.
I said, well, here even I said, well,
even if they were Jewish, you would simply
say fake Jew as you did above, which
I believe is anti semitic, actually. And I
said, if I understand well, you know, in
a way they would use it. I said,
if I understand the current Zionist bastardization of
that term correctly oh, I I did address
it. But here is a highly respected academic
who is Jewish telling you what Zionism is.
Do you remember what that clip says? If
you don't, here it is.
Zionism
is racism.
Israel cannot be both. Israel is either
a racist Jewish state
or it's a democratic state for everybody, and
that's what I would like Israel to be.
I'd like a democratic solution, one state with
equal rights
for,
all its inhabitants.
He goes on to talk about the reason
for that, which is the nation state law,
which explicitly states that they have an exclusive
right
for the Jews alone in Israel.
But she makes makes the point. That's racist
in and of itself. That is they are
the only state that has a law that
explicitly states that they're racist.
It's it's it's amazing what people can disregard.
So suddenly, he's not Jewish anymore because he
points out the obvious in the eyes of
these people.
Same point here. Somebody's just highlighting this. I
simply tagged what that person said and said,
unusual,
Zionist exposing that this is really about protecting
Zionism, not Judaism. When you criticize Israel or
Zionism, even if Jewish, Zionist will claim you're
no longer Jewish, proving it's about Zionism, not
Judaism.
This person says they they DM you with
threats if you are anti Zionist Jew. I
also got blocked by Christians United for Israel.
Apparently, you're not a real Christian if you're
not Zionist as well. It's crazy where this
goes.
It's I mean, it really is. It's it's
never ending.
So the next one
is a this is a clip of
a anti Zionist orthodox Jew
who is screaming at one of these Zionists.
And it's just in Israel, and he says,
only because of
the Maccabee Tel Aviv family, the the in
Amsterdam, the whole thing where they were the
ones openly acting racist and violent, and they
tried to make it into a Jewish pogrom.
And they got caught for it, but all
the western media and western politicians apparently still
keep saying it's pogrom. Just like always, they
should never stop using the term because, you
know, 9 they're in the 1984, that thing
to the wall.
It says, they came with Israeli flags only
because of Zionism. They harmed Jews around the
world. That's what this Jewish person is saying.
He's yelling at them saying, you're the reason
Jews are unsafe.
Ultra orthodox,
anti conscription protester comments on the Amsterdam events
and blames Zionism in the state of Israel
for rising antisemitism around the world.
Now it's it's in Hebrew.
He said, Jews are afraid to leave their
homes because of you.
He said so they told him, listen. He
said what? So we'd also be inside this
murderous swamp, in this in this heretic, secular
swamp? See, this is people that actually respect
their beliefs
and recognize that everything Zionism is challenges Judaism.
This is the whole point about why it's
not about one of it is the p
there are clearly an overlap. There's clearly a
a Jewish supremacy that exists within Zionism just
like there's a Christian supremacy that exists within
Zionism. The point is it's Zionism manipulating
them. That doesn't make them not Christian or
not Jewish in their minds. The point is
that's not what the focal point should be.
So you can't say all Jews are the
problem or all Christians are the problem because
that's not true.
Simple.
Here's another somebody else posting the same video
and simply writing, during a Heredi protest in
Israel against lobbying the army and conscription, what
this is what he said. Jews have become
hated in the world because of Zionism.
All in which I argue and Dan Cohen,
which I'll I'll grab that actually with that
interview because we we discussed exactly that.
He which Dan Cohen is Jewish himself, and
he highlights the very point in this discussion.
The manufactured Middle East plight and Zionism linchpin.
The point that
that is the objective of Zionism,
to create and to justify its existence.
And it says all over the world, he
continues, Jews are afraid to leave their homes
because of Zionism. I don't actually agree with
that. But that's what they're present that's what
they're projecting.
Some of them actually think this way, but
I don't think the threat is really there
outside of a lot of these certain places
like Israel, for example. It says we and
to be clear on that, there's an endless
amount of information and videos you could find
of orthodox Jews being beat up by IDF
because they're anti Zionist. It says we will
not enlist. We will not turn our into
Zionist. We will not be in this swamp,
the swamp of murderers,
the swamp of infidels, of secular swamp in
which there is all the corruption and evil
in the world.
Good for them.
Oh, that's the wrong one. Hold on.
So next, here's Zachary Foster simply highlighting
the background on this. In 20 in 2002,
in 2007, in 2008, in 2014, in 2021,
and 2023
to current,
Israel carried out mass murder campaigns of Palestinians.
When a state claims to represent world Jewry
and Judaism at large and massacres Palestinians
in the name of Jewish safety, we see
a rise in anti Jewish attacks, which, by
the way, they then point to. But these
days seem to just broadly manufacture for the
same reason and then use that to justify
why they have to exist. Now you're starting
to see entire groupings and organizations of Jewish
people go, we see what you're doing.
You're making this happen.
And, guys, it's been called out for a
long time. It just used to be covered
under a guise of you're being racist. And
in some cases, that was the truth,
but it's not all encompassing.
It says, thanks for endangering me, Israel, he
writes, and he's Jewish himself.
And just highlights that you can read this
just giving you the background on what we're
discussing.
Now, this this person who's a very rabid
pro Israel entity,
that it show it points it makes the
point for me.
He points out something in New York and,
I think this is New York. Right? Simply
says, birthright Israel put up a billboard in
Times Square that simply says Jewish and proud.
Okay. What are you advertising?
I don't what what do you what do
you what the account what do you do?
What are you paying to get done here?
Ask yourself that.
To to shove this in your face. That's
what it is. It says the younger generation
of Jews will not be intimidated. We will
not go anywhere. Okay. What we just showed
you is what my point is. People like
Zachary and orthodox Jews, they look at this,
and they they that's Zionism
shoving this in the faces of people who
would then turn around and blame Jewish people
for what they're doing.
My point is that most people walking around
recognize what's really going on. We see the
genocide. We see Israel committing the genocide, and
then we see this get shoved in our
face, which then makes them resent Jewish people
by design, even though it's Zionism putting the
bait out like that.
Jewish no nobody cares. Nobody's out there worrying
about whether you're Jewish or not. That is
them jiving the there there is always a
level of people who are racist, people who
are that's in every category. I maybe you
can argue it's a little bit more now
because of what they're doing. But either way,
the reality is that this is being done
in order to to to manufacture
what they need to justify their existence, and
it's not working anymore.
So when you listen to people like Zachary
Foster or orthodox Jews or Torah Judaism who
are telling you that what they're doing is
designed to make them unsafe,
ask yourself why they need to do this.
What does it accomplish to put this in
the middle of New York time in New
York in in Times Square?
Well, they would argue it's because
Jews are unsafe and were attack okay. So
what you're doing that to to do what?
To make them feel safe?
Well, no. Essentially, you're you're taunting
Jewish and proud.
To be clear, hear me on this. I'm
I don't care whether you're Jewish and proud.
I don't care about whether the this is
genuine or not. The point is that you
have to recognize there's no real objective of
other than to put this out there to
go see, I'm strong. We're not afraid of
you. Well, nobody's threatening you, man. So all
that does is create animosity.
You see what I'm
saying? It's very, very deliberate.
It it I mean, you could argue look.
Let's even put it this way. Even if
there was such rampant dark cloud of antisemitism
which we've proven is not true, what would
that accomplish?
It doesn't it it just has to be
very clear what they're trying to accomplish.
And here's what Norah Winkelstein lays out very
well to just make a couple points about
Gaza in the next segment before we get
into everything else. And I really do think
he did a great job. And this is
pretty much just a compilation of this one
interview he did where, I forget her name
now, the one who just got caught 3
times in a row in one sitting lying
about churches and Christians and things about Palestine.
Very, very lazily and then very just very
very embarrassing. And she's the one that just
continues to scream and smile about genocide on
every show she goes on. Because, like, I
I think she's one of the few that
is not afraid to be put out there
and made look really stupid right now because
their narratives are falling apart. But Norman Finkelstein
does a great job just giving you the
facts.
Israel forfeited its right to self defense. This
isn't the war against Hamas. This is a
war against Gaza. In fact, it's not a
war at all. It's a genocide.
Where we are now, I would say Gaza
is no more.
Gaza has been pulverized. It's been obliterated.
And that was the Israeli goal from October
7th. As you recall, for sure, the statements
that immediately came out after October 7th spoke
about Amalek, spoke about there not being any
civilians in Gaza. The intention was to once
and for all liquidate,
solve the Gaza question. And in my opinion,
they have succeeded in that regard. And that
was the intention. The
Gaza Hamas aspect
was pretty much a sideshow. If I need
psychoanalysis,
I wouldn't go to a representative of a
lunatic state. I would go to a rational
person.
Number 2,
Israel never left Gaza.
That's not my opinion.
In 2005,
Israel
relocated
its troops from inside Gaza to the periphery
of Gaza.
What goes into Gaza?
What goes out of Gaza? Who goes into
Gaza? Who goes out of Gaza? The airspace,
the water, everything was controlled by Israel.
The guardian of the 4th Geneva Convention is
the International Committee of the Red Cross. The
opinion of the Red Cross from 2006 to
the present is that Israel
Israel remains the occupying power in Gaza. That's
the opinion of the United Nations. It's the
opinion of all human rights I don't disagree
with you about any of that. But Let
me ask you a simple question. Okay?
If you're at war with Gaza
Mhmm. Why are you shooting children in the
skull and in the chest? The New York
Times published an article on that, came under
a lot of flack because they published that
article. They said we can't refute the evidence.
We have the X rays in front of
us. They're shooting children
in the head, in the skull, and in
the chest.
So just you gotta really think about what
he's saying, and this is the same thing
that doctor was telling you earlier.
Sniper bulls to the head.
In what context is that happening? And we're
again, understand. Over and over and over and
over. As he said in the beginning, almost
exclusively children. So pretend it's human shields. Walk
me through how that works out.
Okay? Pretend that it's, you know, bombing an
entire area and just or, you know, trying
to go after him and killing them by
accident. Okay. How do they have 2 sniper
shots to the head or in the chest?
I mean, guys, this is this is why
even the New York Times, there's no misunderstanding
what you're looking at. They are choosing
to murder children.
I know that's really hard for some people,
even not even whether you wanna support Israel
or not. It's just such a disgusting thing
to understand is happening. And so sometimes people
just don't want to admit it, but it's
real. It's happening. It's right in front of
you. And the only way we're gonna stop
it is if we're honest about it.
If you're engaged in the war in Gaza,
why are you killing journalists?
Why are you killing medics?
Why are you killing UN workers?
If you're engaged in the war with Hamas,
why is it that Human Rights Watch just
this past week put out a report?
They tell people where to flee. They say
go to the safe zones. Human Rights Watch
says,
when we,
when the people are directed, they're being shot
at at the road. When you get to
the safe areas I understand. I've already made
that point. Israel jumps £2,000 bombs out of
it. Does that sound like a war? Or
does that sound like a genocide?
Because even take I know you're not allowed
to say it, but since I know the
topic very well, take the case of the
Nazis. Mhmm. The Nazis needed the cover of
a war
in order to carry out the final solution.
Now, Hitler had plans earlier on,
but it required a certain amount of cover,
propaganda and all sorts of other,
devices in order to carry it out.
Gaza is in the news. If you want
to hear my full answer, I'm not giving
you a short answer. Short answer. My answer
doesn't have short answer. That's correct.
I don't have short answers. I've said it
to you before. In my opinion,
Israel
here, it's not my opinion. I'll quote Diera
Island, Israel, the former head of Israel's National
Security Council. Israel create I'm quoting him now
in 2004. He said Gaza is, quote, a
huge concentration camp.
Israel created a huge concentration camp in Gaza.
Israel imposed a medieval blockade on Gaza, which
has been characterized as a crime against humanity.
Israel periodically
went into Gaza on its high-tech killing sprees
with it called operations.
I would say Israel created I think I'm
quoting now, the British economist called Gaza a
toxic dump.
If Hamas,
by killing
1200 people on October 7th,
disqualified
itself
from participating in any future in the resolution
of the conflict,
then Israel, by a factor of maybe 20
times more, has disqualified
itself.
And we have to add, it's not just
the state of Israel.
It's the entire
population
of Israel,
which gets more and more enthusiastic
and relishes more and more each time a
massacre
unfolds in Gaza.
Accused of being a, quote, self hating Jew.
What's your response to that quite common yet
very serious accusation?
Well, my response is a a completely rational
one. Let's say it's true for argument's sake,
I'm a self hating Jew.
What does that have to do with the
facts?
I mean, if Einstein was a self hating
Jew for argument's sake, that mean e does
not equal mc squared? What do the facts
have to do with what I am or
what I'm not? If I were a self
loving Jew, would that mean everything I say
is true?
Excellent point. But also highlights the woke right
side of all this. It's this it's identity
politics, guys. It's the same thing coming from
the anti semitism,
so protecting Israel angle. But it makes an
excellent point right there. So, yeah, what the
the that's how these things have to work.
Right? So listen to it again.
Do with what I am or what I'm
not. If I were a self loving Jew,
would that mean everything I say is true?
Well, yes. You see, that's the kind of
subconscious principle that's being put forward. That ultimately,
you're a self hating Jew, therefore, you're being
deceptive. But be if you're not, then we
are then it's it's the way it's like
a almost like a reverse what would you
call that? I'm sure there's a term for
that. By planting that, you ultimately then subconsciously
accept the opposite of it.
So
oh, damn it. I didn't wanna show that.
But so let's let's go into
a few points about Gaza to let make
sure we're not missing losing sight of what's
continuing to happen there. Then we're gonna jump
into the conversation
of
the moderate rebels, the reality of the ISIS
patched murderers that are streaming through Syria right
now and how the US and Israel both
openly support them. But Tiberias may wants to
make sure you're not missing this. Palestinian children
were injured this on the 8th after the
bombing of an apartment building in Nusrat camp.
He post this on the 8th as well,
but simply highlights that Israel's genocide against the
Palestinian people has not ended. It continues
night and day right to this very moment,
by the way. Do not forget Gaza now
that they've moved on to Syria. Do not
stop speaking out about it.
Glenn Greenwald points out, and this is as
of today,
as we're watching them murder children in real
time right up to this very moment, what's
the US government doing? Passing legislation for Israel.
Ryan Grim points out the house tomorrow plans
to or about to to ban the US
government
from citing the Ministry of Health and Gaza's
casualty figures. Instead of working to end the
genocide, congress will instead do this.
You know why that's ridiculous as I've shown
you many times?
Oh, wait. What was it?
There's
that one. I thought accurate popped up too.
Oh, you know what? It's vice news.
There it is.
I mean, this it just it kills me
how dumb this stuff is. So you're the
US government is actively about to pass a
bill or trying to
the Republican led or will be anyway,
a bill to make it illegal to point
to statistics
that the Israeli
military
and the Israeli intelligence community have both told
you were accurate and reliable.
K? Here is Israeli media,
dang it,
citing
the army. The army checked and this is
now this is 2024. The army checked and
found that Gaza Health Ministry
fatalities
are reliable.
They just don't care, you see, because Israel's
pushing a narrative against the it's it their
objective is to influence the west.
Here's Vice News quoting intelligence.
The Israeli intelligence has deemed Hamas run health
ministry death figures accurate till January 2024.
I just it this the whole thing is
always like this. Every part of this conversation.
You've got people like Brian Mass and Tom
Cotton out there screeching about racism and and
protecting the country while what they're doing is
actively supporting a foreign country at the expense
of American interest
and ignoring all the facts everywhere in order
to, by the way, suppress your rights. So
if we wanna understand where this is gonna
go, if they're already trying to center what
they can say and use in congress,
you think they're gonna stop telling you what
you can say and do about Israel?
It's right on the surface. As Glenn Greenwald
says, when will the US congress ever pass
a bill that isn't about Israel? You see?
I'm not crazy
how long I've been saying that. If you
go through and look at the congressional,
what's the like, congress dot gov and just
look at, at any moment, how
generally, how many pieces of legislation are in
action?
Meaning not passed, but they're being built, they're
floating, you know, being in in holding.
A lot and this was a long time
ago I did this, but I did it
live on the show. If you simply pull
those things up and search for the word
Israel, you'll find that, like, half of them
in some way or another involve Israel. That's
crazy, and you will not find any other
country like that. And I'm pretty sure I
don't need to explain why that is.
Oops.
So here
is one other point regarding Gaza. And I'll
you can watch it for yourself, but it's
a it's an interview with going underground where
they're they're reevaluating
with her new study that the death toll
in Gaza may actually be upwards of 514,000.
Between a 194,000
to potentially 500,000
or more. That's the reality of what's going
on, and we all know that's where this
is going disgustingly enough. Right? We know the
numbers of Iraq and so on. I mean,
they bombed an entire
the civilization
here, guys. There's so many people buried under
the rubble in the midst of missing. We
this is where it's going. And even the
Lancet told you a 180 something thousand,
and they're
just screaming racism apparently. It's all they have.
Mariame Baghouti points out that in Gaza, as
they're still starving, by the way, right to
this very moment, a large number of Palestinian
detainees
at one of their detention centers
who are also starving even when they're in
their they're in their control
are experiencing food poisoning as a result of
given of them being given rotten food. This
comes after Israeli prison services have already been
starving their populations
only to serve them rotten food on empty
stomachs. Note that at least 45 Palestinian detainees
have now been killed this year inside these
prisons. The number is highly much higher,
and who knows how many of them were
raped while that was happening. Israeli authorities are
refusing to readily disclose the information.
Just
speechless. I mean, it's just
so on the surface. Here's the you're the
chairman of the Euro Medhuman Rights Group documented
cases of makeshift graves for civilians being killed
by the Israeli army, some buried alive.
We have documented a 125 mass graves containing
of 100 of civilians
while the names of forcibly displaced individuals continue
to accumulate.
Twice, they've caught them on video burying people
in the sand.
But let's all pretend like it's not happening.
How about that? What about how about that
Tom Cotton? Let's pretend like it's not even
there. Right?
Here, to overlap this, what we're seeing right
now in Syria,
just like you're gonna see in a moment,
you have the Israeli entities destroying Christian buildings.
3rd oldest Greek Orthodox church in the world,
Israel destroyed. This was just recently in November
28th. Here's the, apparently, the Christians that don't
exist according to Israel in Gaza who are
telling you what they just did.
You're seeing it right now in Syria, by
the way. So, also, just keep this in
mind as we go into the lies about
Syria. Don't forget. This is actually important to
remember. Remember this whole lie they put out
about chief of hospital with this whole in-depth
graphic showing you the the buildings and the
floors and the different tunnels and the compounds.
Guess what?
Completely proven to be false.
This person says, was reminded today that they
just a 110%
fabricated this and completely got away with it.
No. They didn't get away with it. We
all caught them. Just the people that would
otherwise make it mainstream
never acknowledged it.
That's the bar we're always talking about. Seems
like most everybody who cared to look was
recognizing that's not what happened. Even some level
of the corporate conversation acknowledged that, But it
never fully was, like, all the way through
the whole mainstream conversation. Our government lied about
it. I mean, people like Tom Cotton still
pretend like they found a command center. That's
how infiltrated our government is.
Max Blumenthal pointing out, and it was,
Gallant.
Wanted war criminal
Gallant,
who branded Palestinians as human animals before subjecting
them to a holocaust,
freely enters the US and finds a friendly
audience at the neocon, win up think tank.
Behold a moral degeneracy of the rules based
order and American Zionist establishment.
So freely walks in.
The guy's literally got a arrest warrant from
the international community, and our government doesn't care.
I mean, it just if they ever pretended
like they cared about these things, they don't
know.
And here he is with Brett McGurk.
I have just completed, Gallant, Glantz says, an
important meeting with the White House. So he
went all the way to the White House.
I mean, if you if you saw for
one second, like, any of them were were
I mean, why wouldn't maybe, like, a Massey
or anyone else out there in this conversation
that's pretending, or maybe they mean it, I
don't know, to actually care about what's going
on, believe in the law, care that they're
committing genocide. I mean, you realize there's people
in congress that say they're committing genocide. Why
wouldn't they do something about it? He's at
the White House. Call the police.
Get some people there and arrest him. Even
if he gets taken back or the other
members of congress get him released, at least
it would be the right thing to do,
and at least it would make attention.
Make him scared he should be.
Right? You're talking about Alex Karp worrying about
making your adversary scared. This guy is a
genocidal maniac who's literally killing children, and we
don't wanna scare him. We wanna scare the
people trying to stop him.
Our discussion focused on tangible possibility of a
breakthrough on the hostage issue.
While they've been met systematically
breaking that deal the entire time according to
Israeli media.
You're just normalizing genocide. That's all this is.
And don't forget, here's Brett McGurrick telling you,
as we bring in this into Syria, that
Idlib was the largest Al Qaeda hotspot, the
place where we are now being told the
the current leadership of Syria came from.
Idlib province,
look. Idlib province is the largest Al Qaeda
safe haven since 911
tied directly to Ayman al Suhiri. This is
a huge problem.
It's been a problem for some time.
Now he goes on well, you know, I'll
play all the way through. There's important things
he says. We have shown the spotlight, the
international spotlight on ISIS.
We've been very focused on Al Qaeda in
Idlib province. Leaders of Al Qaeda that make
their way to Idlib province often do not
make their way out of there. But we
have to ask a question, why
and how is Aiman al Swahiri's deputy finding
his way to Idlib province?
Why is this happening? How are they getting
there? They're not paratroopers.
So and the approach, I obviously will not
talk about anything the US government has done
in certain parts of Syria on this problem.
But the approach by some our partners
to send in tens of thousands of tens
of thousands of tons of of weapons and
looking the other way as these foreign fighters
come into Syria may not have been the
best approach.
And, Al Qaeda has taken full advantage of
it. And Idlib now is a huge problem.
It
Now let's be clear. He's talking about Turkey.
The the the whole rat line or whatever
they've called it. This it they're aware of
this. So I don't know if Gregor in
this moment was aware of it because this
act this actual statement came back to bite
them right afterwards because Vanessa and I and
plenty of others had conversations
right, like, a year after he said that
or right after he said it, showing you
that Idlib was where the US government and
Turkey were operating. So it made them look
bad. But either way, the point was whether
he knew it or not, he's simply highlighting
what they were all involved in. This was
a manufactured effort to flood Syria with radical
elements to destabilize it and eventually remove them
from power.
It's an Al Qaeda safe haven right on
the border of Turkey.
So that's something, obviously, we will be in
very close discussions with the Turks on.
And I think as we did in some
ISIS areas in sealing the border, making sure
nobody can cross,
is something we might have to think about
in Idlib province because it's a huge problem.
It's a different problem than ISIS,
but it is a big problem and something
we have to very much focus on as
a counterterrorism
objective. I mean, they're overlapped.
It's we're talking about proxy elements of the
US and Israel. So Vanessa is the one
that shared this. This is a 5 year
old video. Idlib province is the largest Al
Qaeda safe haven since 911.
So I just wanna highlight this, and this
I think I have those I'll come up
in a second. I've opened with some clips
there. But, you know, this just goes back
to 2017,
same time frame. Syria's moderate rebels
to form a new alliance. And this is
what we're talking about. US funding for rebel
groups in Northern Syria has been partially restored.
And realize, can you can do you remember
whose administration this is during?
Donald Trump's.
Right in the middle of his administration.
Not surprising. Shouldn't be because they're all equally
playing this role. I'm gonna show you some
statements he made in a second. The point
of the new military alliance of rebels
in Northern Syria aims to consolidate military control
over Idlib province.
We're it's what we're talking about, guys. That's
the people in in control of Syria, which
shouldn't be so surprising if you've been at
least even watching our shows. This is transparent.
They're right now telling you the biggest boogeyman
they ever the the one they've been screaming
is the biggest boogeyman ever is suddenly the
person they want you to think is supposed
to be in control of Syria because he
changed his shirt and cut his beard.
And realize, I'm not trying to suggest anything
other than they're
telling you what they want you to hear
because realize they're the proxy element to Israel
in Syria
and plenty of other, I think,
agendas in there or interest rather.
My point is that who knows whether they
know that or whether they're aware. The it
doesn't really matter at the end point.
We have to remember today that the people
that are currently being allowed to overthrow
rape, pillage, and murder are the ones that
they have put in position.
Like we heard earlier, sometimes they
don't really control what ultimately happens, which I
don't they don't care if people could suffer
in Syria.
But, ultimately, they all what they want is
to be able to, you know, pick the
bones clean afterward or whatever they wanna accomplish.
So here is Glantz,
and it's Hadi's pointing out the fall of
Assad's murderous regime in Syria, as you should
know by now, as everyone, including Biden and
Netanyahu are saying, serves the state of Israel
despite the risk inherent in it. And as
they both said after that, that they were
responsible,
that this wouldn't have happened without what they
did. So they're they're not only working along
with what they're doing, they're siding with the
terrorist groups and currently bombing with them
or for them rather.
And simply, Caitlin Johnstone simply just so so
to recap,
Russia invading a country in the name of
protecting security interests from perceived threats on its
border equals wrong, evil, worst thing ever.
Israel invading a country in the name of
protecting security interest from a perceived threat on
its border equals fine. Normal.
Typical hypocrisy. Now you could argue, well, that's
not Russia did. Okay. Fair enough. I disagree.
But it's easy to prove that Israel is
not acting and securing its interest. So it's
always the same game. The point is you
can't just pretend, like, if there's a law
in place that says you can't do this,
you can't go, but but but it's okay
because we like what they're trying to accomplish,
which is what the US government does every
day. That's the point in in what I'm
making through what she's saying. If you just
are objective about the law, it doesn't matter
what your intent is. Well, you're in you're
jumping you're invading a country and occupying its
territory for fill in the blank.
Well, that's against the law.
And here is,
Horton
breaking down something. Just a very quick clip.
Breaking down something speaking to Candace Owens, I
think, is important that goes back long before
where we currently are. The moral of the
story, the point he's making. The US government
and Israel have been funding radicals to destabilize
countries and a lot in most cases, secretly,
as far back as you wanna
look. It's nothing new.
And eventually, September 11th.
Now this whole time,
Bill Clinton is still backing these guys. He
supports their side, not directly to them in
in in in the way of the Afghanistan
war, but pretty close. He's certainly backing their
side in Bosnia,
Kosovo, and Chechnya to work with the Brits
and the Saudis to back East Mujahideen.
And in the case of the Balkans, it's
against the Serbs who are the ethnic and
religious kin and close allies of the Russians.
They were the ones who fought on our
side against the Nazis in World War 2
Right. And rescued 500 downed American pilots, by
the way. Typical. Right? So, you know, the
allies that you're the point is that there's
nothing sacred to these people.
There is no one there's no deal. There's
no agreement. There's no ally.
It's their interests.
Might makes right. But,
the Balkan wars, the Bosnia war, and then
the Kosovo war of 1999,
that was at the expense
of the Russians, and they backed literal bin
Ladenites,
in those wars and then also in Chechnya.
So what we're seeing is just a trend
over decades in which
the United States is not getting their hands
dirty,
sending over weapons, supplies, money, funding these these
insurgents, and then suddenly deciding when they wanna
determine that they are actually terrorists. Never mind.
Forget everything.
And suddenly, we pretend that we're the heroes
because we're going to get rid of them.
Well, I mean, it's kind of a clumsy
way to frame it, but it's right. I
would simply say as usual that they fund
whoever they want to accomplish their goal
and then don't care about them,
like the Kurds, over and over and over.
Like, you could argue that the plan was
to eventually
blame them and go after them, but I
don't I don't think that's always the case.
I just think it's there's nothing sacred.
Right? As I've said in the past many
times, every big boogeyman they play they point
to in the past, right before that was
their chief ally, like an Obama or, Obama,
Osama bin Laden or a, a a a
Saddam Hussein.
They were allies with them. In fact, they
armed Saddam with chemical weapons to go after
Iran and then later turned on it. That's
how they operate. But was the plan to
do that or simply that they just never
found eventually lost his they didn't have an
interest for him anymore. There was no need
for him anymore to be the thing he
was. In fact, eventually, he becomes a threat
simply because he knows too much. Like, that's
how this tends to work, I my opinion.
So it's easy to arm Hamas until suddenly
they're not needed anymore and then you go
after them. Right? Or use them, like everything
else we're seeing and what she is saying,
to justify the next step.
Right? So we're done using them, so now
we want to take over this part, so
we'll pretend they're the one we're gonna go
after.
It's everywhere you look.
I mean, just like Osama bin Laden and
and Saddam Hussein, well, Gulani
was their guy.
Right? I mean, they're they're right. Well, I
guess, technically speaking in the public narrative, it's
the other way around today, where now he's
their guy or before he was the terrorist,
which is actually pretty interesting. But either way,
my point is that they're always working with
these entities
by just choosing when they wanna use them.
And he just highlights that saying, finally, someone
speaks the truth about what what went on
in Bosnia, Serbia, Kosovo. American funded Islamic terrorists
were sent there to butcher Orthodox Serb Christians.
And this is the this is one of
the other points. It's and I'm actually I
don't agree with everything Candace Owens says, but
I'm really glad to see that she has
the courage to call out in the right
conversation, the woke right, the idea that they're
they're just blatantly ignoring how Israel is focusing
on Christian things right now and how it
always has been. I just I don't know
how in the world anybody on this can't
call that out. So I'm glad she's doing
that. That's part that's what they're also watch
the rest of the interview. It's a good
just a good discussion. The same Serbs that
fought alongside American World War 2, where our
farmers risked their lives and their families' lives
to save 500 downed American soldiers. The rule
was for every dead German, they'd butcher a
100 Serbs. On October 21, 1941, Nazi soldiers
killed about 4,000 Serbs as part of the
atonement exercise and occupied Serbia.
Serbs fought against these Islamic demons 600 plus
years ago, and now we have them and
globalists trying to exterminate us and destroy orthodox
Christianity. That's that's his take on it all.
The point is simply that we can see,
historically,
how much they play the game. I mean,
simply put us before, that there's nothing sacred.
That the enemy of yesterday become the ally
today and vice versa. And it's really not
about anything other than what works for their
interests.
Now, here's an old clip. I've you've seen
I've like, I've played this before, actually. Charlie
Rose,
where he's discussing
it's Mike Morell from the CIA for the
past.
Just that at pretty at a moment of
pretty open discussion
that if when they need to, they just
covertly kill Russians and Iranians. Not not government,
mind you. People,
Which I don't know. This shouldn't be shocking
if you watch this show or pay attention
at all. But to some people, it will
be. We need to make
the the Iranians pay a price in Syria.
We need to make the Russians pay a
price. The other thing I need, we make
them pay the price by And by the
way, the point being, that's what's happening now.
Right? So all this time forward, they're making
them pay the price,
which means they're people, guys, which is what's
happening. Syrians are suffering like crazy right now.
Let's pay a price in Syria. We need
to make the Russians pay a price. The
other thing I would need, we make them
pay the price by killing
killing Russians Yes.
And killing Iranians. Yes.
Covertly. Wow. So you don't tell the world
about it. Right? They don't stand up at
the Pentagon and say we did this. Right?
But you make sure they know it in
Moscow and to the people who here's the
other thing I wanna do. Which by the
way then so this is Alex Karp mindset,
mind you. Right? So now they know you
murdered their families, and now they're gonna be
like, oh, you're too strong. We're not gonna
fight back. Is that how that works?
Look back in any moment in history to
realize how dumb that would be to argue
that that's gonna happen now. That's gonna end
up causing more violence, which is exactly what
they want.
Here's the other thing I wanna do. I
wanna go after I wanna go after
those things that Assad sees
as
his personal power base. Right? I wanna scare
Assad. Ah. So I want to That sounds
familiar. Wanna,
go after his presidential guard.
I wanna bomb his offices in the middle.
You know, you should recognize right now that
there is basically today no difference between intelligence
and and Silicon Valley, as Whitney's pointed out
many times. Right? The carps and teals of
the world, they might as well be the
intelligence community. I think there's a very thin
line between that. Overnight. Well, that happened about
2 years ago. Do you remember when his
brother-in-law was
I want to destroy his presidential aircraft on
the ground. I wanna destroy destroy Brother-in-law was
I want to destroy his presidential aircraft on
the ground. I wanna destroy his presidential helicopters.
I wanna Who cares if there's pilots in
there or innocent people?
Because we're the moral army of the world.
Right? Make him think we're coming after him.
Right?
I'm not advocating assassinating him. I'm not I'm
not advocating that. Just kill people around him
and make him scared because that's what the
moral leader of the world would do.
You realize how blatant that is? He's literally
expressly saying, kill people around him to make
him scared and uncomfortable and uncertain.
Those people are not criminal. You're not you're
just murdering people.
Yes, guys. If you have not realized by
now that that's who we're talking
this government
has would I mean, for crying out loud.
If we'd have they would kill just about
anything if it was in the way of
their agenda,
which, by the way, is why what we're
doing is dangerous, to be honest.
I'm advocating going after the what he thinks
is his power base, right, and what he
needs to survive. I want him to think
about,
this is not gonna end well for me.
Right?
I wanna I wanna put pressure on him.
I wanna put pressure on the Iranians. I
wanna put pressure on the Russians,
to come to that diplomatic settlement.
I honestly just don't know why we have
to convince people of this. There's so much
evidence. It's unreal.
So here's a great thread.
You know, you don't have to agree with
everything he's saying, but I think there's a
lot of good information on this. And so
he's simply saying, you know, let me give
you a breakdown of of his perception of
what Assad and family and and actions were.
He says 50 photos and other media to
illustrate the truth about Syria and Assad.
So he's simply highlighting what happened in 2,011
was not a civil war, which you all
know well, hopefully. It was a proxy war
waged by a 100,000 plus jihadists flown into
Syria from all over the world. Right? And
that's you know, Idlib ultimately became kind of
like a central hotspot, same with Altam, the
Ruben camp. But before that, it was coming
in from all over the place. And as
you can see, largely a lot of lot
coming down from,
you know, south, essentially, through Turkey in a
lot of different locations. But it says, weapons
also flowed from all well, to be clear,
not
south coming from Egypt Africa and from Turkey.
And the point being is that we're talking
about the the converging from all different directions.
I just said that too quickly. So you
can see right here, Turkey's up above northern
Syria,
Iraq, Jordan. You can see it coming from
everywhere. And the point is this is not
necessarily
individual
actions
as opposed to a coordinated event
using assets from all over. And that's one
of the things we overlap with the conversation
of both Ukraine as well as Gaza,
That you have the same kind of structure
that's being used in certain ways. Now it
says weapons also flowed from all over the
world and they were,
snuck into Syria mostly using Syria Turkey border.
That's what I was kind of alluding to.
Say some came in through Syria and Iraq
as well. Now it says the collusion to
topple Assad involved many countries. US and Israel
supplied weapons, money, propaganda.
Saudi Arabia and Qatar provided money. Al Jazeera
propaganda. Turkey and Jordan played key roles in
logistics. UK provided propaganda and established the white
helmets. France recruited traders.
It says 2 main reasons. The US and
Israel and, again, there's a lot I think
there's plenty more, but even you can disagree
without Maine. But, yeah, I think those are
good points. The US and Israel want total
hegemony in the region. The US has had
plans to break up many countries in the
region, plus the Greater Israel Project.
So interesting point. But zebri
Zabrygny Brzezinski and the idea of, like, the
balkanization of these areas,
it's interesting because I do think that the
US thinks that's the end game. But I'm
pretty sure that Israel has a different end
game. When you just simply look at the
great original project,
like, even right now, people are arguing that
essentially when you look at just this one,
that right now, for those not on the
not those on the video version, the not
blue part here would be the part that
the US, like, actually currently largely holds a
little bit down here, but would be theirs.
And then the bottom half of that blue
part of Syria would be
Israel's, and the top part would be Turkey's.
But look at what Israel thinks they're gonna
get.
Part of Turkey, almost all of Syria, and
half of Iraq, part of Syria Arabia, part
of Egypt.
You know, that's not a joke. This is
an open objective of theirs. So what's interesting
is to think about
is that like the discussion which we'll get
into in a second once I get fully
into kind of the updates on what's going
on in Syria.
I genuinely still think that there was some
kind of an agreement that was laid out
and that Israel was the part that took
advantage of it. And maybe the US was
aware that was the plan or not, but
either way, my point would be that you
can see the United States making an agreement
that would allow Assad to step down, which
Sputnik did report. Sputnik reported it. He steps.
He resigns and calls for peaceful transition.
There's a reason that nobody if that's the
case, as Vanessa's pointing out, nobody read his
resignation letter, all this stuff. You know, this
it's interesting. But then I would ask why
Russia might not put it out. Right? Again,
it's all up in the air right now.
But what's interesting though is you can see
how it would work that the US would
make an agreement with the interest of if
you step down, which I'll show you in
a minute. That was actually one thing that
they do have floated.
And the Biden administration
was before this working on an agreement with
the UAE
for exchange for Assad stepping down and distancing
himself.
And I think that that was what they
agreed to. Maybe the US didn't even know.
Israel doesn't care about making the US look
bad. Or maybe they did and they're just
being dishonest as always, but made an agreement
that then Israel took advantage of. So the
US would be thinking, we're gonna vulcanize this
and control different areas, and then Israel just
jams in the middle and tries to take
all of it. I mean, it would kinda
make sense to me. But either way, the
point is, 1, being both the greater Israel
project and just control. 2, Qatar won the
gas pipeline through Syria to Turkey and Europe,
but Assad won to the Iranian pipeline. Now
it's a little more complicated than that, but
I do think that's a part of this.
And I think there are other vying parts
of this as well. It's changed a bit
over the years. But it says in 2010,
the New York Times travel section listed 31
best places to visit in the world.
And Damascus,
the capital of Syria, was ranked number 7.
It's amazing how fast things changed. In 2010,
a may the New York Times listed the
capital
of of Syria as the number 7 place
in the world.
Now what's interesting is you can show that
there was a lot going on then, but
the mainstream
conversation hadn't spun yet.
Then it goes on to say in 2010,
Vogue Magazine had an an article about Assad's
wife,
the first lady, called her the a rose
in the desert and described her as her
great works, education, theater, charity, hospitals.
So amazing how they become murdering villainous dictators
after you went out of your way to
highlight how their charity, you know, there were
I mean, same stuff with about Assad. It's
really interesting.
So are how the Nazis of Ukraine became
the freedom fighters 30 seconds after they changed
their mind.
Now it says the west once loved Assad.
He was called the lion of Damascus. France
gave him the highest award, the legion of
honor. Queen Elizabeth invited him Assad and his
wife. Nancy Pelosi flew to Syria. European and
Arab leaders met with him all the time.
Even the pope went to Syria.
Look.
I mean, it's really crazy to think about
how this is really not that long ago.
Most people today wouldn't even think that's real.
That's how broken this is, how propaganda in
the partisan field has broken things.
Now it's a Syria under Assad was secular,
moderate. Now this you could disagree with his
framing of what Syria was like or is.
I frankly agree with most of what he's
saying. Sunni, Shi'ites, Christians, Alawites, but and you
can prove what he's saying here. Kurds, Americans,
etcetera, got along.
Lived the 3rd largest Christian population in all
of the Middle East before they destroyed Syria.
No Al Qaeda, no Sharia law, no Muslim
brotherhood.
All easy to prove.
Syrians loved Assad, which, again, I very much
think this is one of the easiest things
to prove. He could walk around and drive
around Damascus and Syria without security forces. I
mean, can you imagine any American president or
any fight anywhere in the west right now
doing that for the podcast? Assad would do
this all the time. He would go to
major crowds and just
no no securities walk into these crowds.
And says, in fact, the Arab world loved
him in 2009.
Zobipolo, an American firm, Assad was the most
popular leader in the region.
Fair foreign policy. Bashar al Assad was the
highest rated Arab leader.
Now they and and realize almost ought to
die, and they want you to think that
he's they all hate him and want a
revolution because he changed his he went a
foul of what they wanted of him.
Assad is also the good father and husband,
they write. He raised, you know, smart family
and, you know, again, it's it's subjective. You
could look at the pictures. I'm sure you
could find pictures of I mean, I'm sure
even villainous dictators love their children or at
least like their children. But my point would
be, I don't think that's what Assad is.
I just don't. I think there's more than
enough evidence to show that. I don't think
that any government should be seen as something
other than a potential problem. That's my opinion.
But either way, you can look and prove
and see all the stuff and all the
lie. Again, as always, how much they have
to lie about these people should usually give
you the indication that at very least, they're
not what they say they are.
Not as much, anyway. It says, but for
reasons discussed earlier, the US and its evil
friends decided to do a regime change in
Syria. The, quote, moderate rebels were neither moderate
nor rebels. And we all should know this
by now. They were extremists and head chopping
terrorists along aligned with Al Qaeda and ISIS.
Al Qaeda equals al Musra, Hayat Tar al
Sham. That's important obviously for where we are.
You're gonna see them wearing these patches right
now in Syria, being supported by the United
States and Israel.
Now it goes on to say, the US
funded rebels are murderous thugs who ruthlessly execute
men and women. And that's Sebeli's been breaking
this down for a long time.
They would kill Shiites and Christians just because
of their religion.
They're doing that right now. They have destroyed
numerous Shiites and mosques and Christian churches, also
happening in Syria.
Syria rebels are ex are actually jihadists from
all over the world, including Uyghurs from China.
These fanatics have terrorist camps of their own
for their children and blah blah blah. Same
stuff that happens in most of these places
run by US and Israel.
While US and NATO funded terrorists targeted Christians,
it was Assad who protected Christianity in all
its forms. When all the rebels destroyed historic
Christian monasteries, Assad visited and rebuilt them. Again,
all the record. This is a Getty image
for crying out loud. Just look it up
for yourself.
It says the church is the same point.
He goes on to make it clear. Church
leaders in Syria repeatedly spoken out in in
favors of Assad. Here is Alan Port from
CNN.
And I'll just play the clip for you
yourself where she's talking about the Syrian rebels
being funded by the US to oust him,
which we should know by now. President, you
know the rhetoric of regime change is headed
towards you from the United States.
They are actively
looking for a new Syrian leader. They're granting
Isn't it crazy how they're just openly pointing
to the fact that they wanna manipulate?
So illegally, without question,
regime change him from power.
Just because it's it's interesting how clear this
stuff is.
Visas and and, visits to Syrian opposition
politicians,
they're talking about
isolating you diplomatically
and perhaps a coup d'etat or your regime
crumbling.
What are you thinking about that?
I feel very confident for one reason, because
I was made in Syria. I wasn't made
in the United States, so I'm not worried.
This is Syrian decision should be should be
made by the Syrian
people. Nobody else in this world. So we
don't discuss it in theory in Syria. What
would happen, do you think, if there was
a an alternative to you?
Who is the alternative to
you? Could be any Syrian.
Any national Syria, and we have a lot.
I'm not the only person,
who is eligible to be president.
We have a lot of Syrians, so we
don't have any bow any problem about that.
But no Syrian would be allowed
to be president if he's made
anywhere outside our borders.
This is a Syrian principle.
Quite a monster.
Under George w Bush, the US secretly recruited
and funded opposition leaders in Syria, but Assad
kept winning elections.
Later, US state department gave 1,000,000 of dollars
to establish a TV station, Barata TV, to
broadcast anti Assad propaganda within Syria. Like, just
think about how aggressive this is. And people,
like, right now in their republican conversation, this
gets framed as what Karp is pointing to.
Because we say they're real bad and they
hate us like our for our freedom. So
we justify,
I mean, that broken logic,
everything.
The very things, by the way, which then
drive them to become what you might have
pretended they were. That's not by accident. In
some cases, maybe they already are. Maybe they
were that to begin with. My point is
in a lot of cases, you can show
that that's not the reality. That they're they're
simply groups that don't wanna bow blindly to
US interest at the expense of their people,
whether or not they do things to expand
benefit themselves at the expense of their people.
The point is that they then
fund the worst people in the world.
They fund the moderate rebel elements, which are
actually the terrorists they claim. The ones that
are currently leading Syria, by the way, and
use them to overthrow the country, which then
start killing the people in the country despite
the fact that you can show that Assad
was not doing that. See, the narrative is
the lie. All the different things they've been
screaming about, the gas attacks we can prove
are false. Maybe you start asking if all
the other things they were saying were also
potentially lies.
Simply ask that question.
The the in this case, jamming your manipulation
into like, creating fake TV stations through intelligence
apparatus to create fake media that convinces them
he's bad. Like, even ask yourself the ones
that maybe do hate him in that country.
Maybe it's because they lied to him. Now
I'm not gonna say that there's not people
that I guarantee there's huge groups of people
that don't want him to be in power.
The question is, do they want
another country deciding for them, or are they
just being used?
2011 saw the biggest regime change operations ever
conducted in the United States by the United
States called Arab Spring.
Thus, US deep state recruited Al Qaeda. February
12, 2012, I'll call the Al Qaeda leader,
Zawahiri,
called jihadists all over the world to go
to Syria and fight Assad.
Same day, Jake Sullivan, adviser of Hillary Clinton,
sent an email saying Al Qaeda is on
our side. I just showed you this yesterday.
This is the kind of stuff that makes
me crazy,
that we can literally
see it on the surface.
And yet you get shouted down by a
bunch of partisans who have an interest in
supporting a side,
who just are so shortsighted they can't see
what they're doing even to their own interests.
Islamic terrorism on steroids. Remember how the CIA
armed the mujahideen with guns and shoulder powered
Stinger missiles to defeat the USSR in the
eighties? It was a 1000 times worse than
Syria where Al Qaeda was given tanks, powerful
rockets, mortars, etcetera, all to basically destroy that
country, but not actually take power until today.
US weapons had elaborate rat lines that involved
out Azerbaijan's
diplomatic airplanes, Saudi Arabia, and finally through Turkey.
Al Qaeda and ISIS got weapons worth 1,000,000,000
of dollars. The the operation was called Timber
Sycamore.
Salafis and Al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood, US
government and media were fooling the world, but
US soldiers and intelligence officers in the field
knew that they were training and arming the
same people who did 911.
Some Green Beret specialists talked about it. And
there's so many whistle blowers speaking out about
what was going on, guys.
US and Israel were openly supporting ISIS on
one side and then using ISIS as an
excuse to bomb Syria, which is exactly what
they're doing right now.
There's an Israeli
leader. I would prefer Islamic State to Iran
and Syria.
Kissinger warns Trump, ISIS is keeping Iran in
check. You must not let Tehran fill the
void. Guys, this is exactly the narrative of
today.
Obama is the founder of ISIS, Donald Trump
says famously.
At the same time though,
here he is in 2013.
Remember all those, quote, freedom fighters in Syria
want to fly planes into our buildings?
I said interesting how narratives change when it
works for your political agenda. 2 party illusion.
Right? Because you realize right now, he's going
Assad out. This isn't our fight. So it's
not our fight to stop the guys you're
telling us are 911 responsible?
The freedom fighters in Syria are exactly who
you said just took power.
I guess in 2013, that's something you're okay
with. Like, point is, guys, they're always lying
to you. Whether he knew it or not,
the point is now, they're all on the
same agenda.
Here's a clip from saying that back in,
I forgot what year it was.
Is honoring
president Obama.
He is the founder
of ISIS. He's the founder of ISIS.
K? He's the founder.
He founded
ISIS.
And
I would say the cofounder
would be crooked
Hillary Clinton.
See how easily he uses things that he
want you wanna hear to get him to
convince to convince you that he's the one?
Now what did he do through his entire
administration?
Supported the same people.
I just showed you.
2017. That was the that was the the
moderate rebels, Brett McGurk. They're supporting them,
arming them, funding them.
It's not hard to see. So he either
knew that and then funded them anyway or
only said that to get you to think
he was fighting the bad guys when then
he went to dinner with the Clintons. And
then by the way, funny how they can
be the founder of ISIS and yet that
you can say they're very great people though
at the right after you become elected.
That's why we laugh at people that fall
for this stuff sometimes because it's just lazy
to not see what's going on. He goes
on to say Al Qaeda leader Al Galani
is now the presumed leader of Syria. He
is from the Golan Heights occupied by Israel.
What a coincidence.
He also spent many years in American jails
in Iraq, ideal place for recruitment.
2017,
Trump put a $10,000,000 bounty on his head,
but now is okay with him leading Syria.
But now the terrorist is whitewashed and glorified
by western propaganda, including Trump.
There were plenty of atrocity propaganda from the
jihadists and west regarding Assad, like the fake
stage chemical attacks. Guy wearing sandals, by the
way. Regular clothes, collecting samples after a sarin
gas attack, because that makes sense. Right?
They literally thought we were this stupid, guys.
It was all over the place. Want to
know what serious future? Look at Idlib, the
province under rebel control,
which by the way, you'll see
exactly what they claim
they're fighting.
Right? The Sharia law, the women forced to
wear head covers, slogans like Shia Muslims are
enemies of Islam, democracy is the religion of
the west, public executions.
That is what they supported in Idlib, guys.
The US and Israel and Turkey were operating
through that location.
These are their people. We're proving that to
this very day.
Now right now in Syria, you've got people
telling you there's now Sharia law in Aleppo.
And, weirdly, people that support Trump's administration screaming
about how this is the good thing and
they just got freedom.
And, like, now just to be clear, I
I only am hyper focusing on that side
of it because they're the ones in power.
And right now, they seem to be the
most clearly bought buying into it all, which
is interesting for me. But just to be
clear,
it's whoever is falling for this.
I think more is let more so it's
being aimed at that side. But either way
And just that same point from Obama being
a founder. Before this aspect of our strategy
was moving too slowly,
but the fall of Ramadi has galvanized the
Iraqi government. So with the additional steps I
ordered last month, we're speeding up training of
ISIL forces, including volunteers from Sunni tribes in
Anbar Province.
ISO is ISIS, guys. It's an 11th. It's
ISIS. It's the Islamic State. There's just no
denying how obvious it all is, and it
went right through Trump's administration.
And it just again, to highlight the fact
that he's selling. You remember those freedom fighters,
and he's talking about the Syrian Democratic Forces,
the moderate rebels,
which are now Hayat al Sham. Well, there's
more nuance to that overlap with the SDF,
but they're all they were talking about the
moderate rebels umbrella,
all of which are in that same category.
They're not the Syrian forces. They are app
proxies of what we're talking about.
And he's telling you, they're the freedom those
freedom fighters are the ones that flew in
building. No. What they what it was was
clearly an operation by the US and Israel,
but that's a whole another conversation, which he
either knows or doesn't know. The point is
he's trying to tell you the ones in
power back then were the biggest boogeyman alive.
Now he doesn't care. Also,
to quick note back to censorship. I forgot
I put this in there. Okay. Here's Trump's
post.
Remember, comma, all these freedom fighters in Syria.
Okay? I explicitly grabbed that right from there.
Copied, posted, searched for on Twitter.
But guess what?
It's not there. You can even quickly notice
that it kinda spins down here, which means
there is more, but Twitter doesn't want it
to show. Oop. Look at that.
Can we just please acknowledge that Twitter right
this moment is no. There's no under latest,
there's nothing.
Well, here's the tweet, guys. It's right
there. There's no questioning it.
So why is it not pumping up when
I search for it on Twitter?
I think you know why. I think it's
because there's selective efforts to keep certain things
hidden.
Algorithmically, I don't know. But you tell at
the very least, at least acknowledge that their
their system is broken, which might drive them
to
I don't know. They make them feel stupid
that they're used there. Like, it's the same
joke as before that YouTube broke itself to
censor us. Well, it's the same thing here.
At the very least, we should make fun
of how their systems work, which makes them
angry that they have to pretend they're broken
to censor us. Either way, it's very clearly
hiding his comments. This is one from December
7th.
Opposition fighters in Syria in an unprecedented move
have totally taken over numerous cities. He's talking
about the ones he just told you in
2013 were terrorists that flew into 911.
Obviously, preparing to make a big move.
He says,
in any event, Syria is a mess, but
not our friend,
except they're the ones you're funding, And the
United States should have nothing to do with
it despite being currently occupying in Syria, stealing
oil and wheat from Syria,
and funding the groups that are overtaking it.
Fiorella Isabelle points out in the same conversation
to show you now to be clear in
this point, we're talking about the 2 party
illusion. We're talking about this tower structure from
either side of this that are have they're
clearly showing you their interest is support The
very people that they've they were telling us
for decades are terrorists, both Trump and Biden,
the left and the right, Fox and CNN.
Make sure you recognize that. She points out
propaganda 101. CNN claimed
Iranian president
refused an interview after reporter, Amapur, refused to
wear a headscarf.
Who knows who knows if that's true or
not? It might be.
The point is, 2 years later, here's a
CNN anchor
who wears a headscarf
for the rebranded Al Qaeda terrorist
who they just talked to.
I mean, it's just that stupid.
So if you you're not willing to speak
with the lead the head of a foreign
country,
but you're willing to wear a scarf to
speak to a very mo a a terrorist
head. Even but based on their narrative,
before 2017 was a head chopping murderous terrorist
who suddenly changed his mind is now a
moderate jihadist. That's the word they used.
It's just disgusting how obvious it is.
Matt Kennard points out in 2006,
a cable from the US Embassy in Damascus
deals with how to weaken the Assad regime.
An official says, quote, possible covert action could
include a play on Sunni fears of Iranian
influence. He recommends working with Egypt and Saudi
to publicize and focus regional tension on the
issue, which by the way means they're lying
to you.
Right? We're going to play on their fear
of Iranian influence.
Well, if it was a real thing, you
wouldn't need to manipulate it.
They're creating illusions all around the world to
justify the destruction and destabilization
of entire civilizations
simply for their benefit.
Real good people we're talking about here.
Alan McLeod, to get into some more current
stuff. Now, we're gonna get into the point
about the actual moderate rebels and more information
about how obviously they're ISIS and what we're
seeing today. He writes, the United States didn't
take and this is actually wild to me.
Think about this. The United States did not
take Nelson Mandela
off of the terrorist list until 14 years
after he became president of South South Africa.
14 years after
he became president of South Africa. Now, obviously,
they hated him for the pushback on because,
obviously, with the Israeli influence, right,
very clearly,
Israel was the chief ally of this
apartheid South Africa. They were working on ethnic
weapons there. It's a public conversation.
The US, as always, blindly supports Israel's agendas.
I think we're starting to see why. In
this case, he was not their friend because
he was calling out what they were doing,
helping break down apartheid South Africa.
My point so his point is 14 years
after that is when they finally took him
off Nelson Mandela off the terrorist list. Today,
the US and UK are considering removing Hyatt
Charles Schom from the terrorist blacklist, who, by
the way, is currently still there with a
$10,000,000 bounty, but they're okay with him being
in power because that's how dumb this is.
We just talked about this on 7th. Israel's
global cybersecurity infiltration, greater Israel occupation,
and the US Israel Syria proxy war, and
the one we did yesterday or day before
yesterday
using terrorist forces,
same as today. Israel moves to take Syria,
and the US and Israeli Israel openly admit
they support Al Qaeda.
Right on the surface, guys.
So today
oh, actually, for for that, I this I
wanna make sure I reiterate this point. So,
Pharrell Isabella put this out on the 5th
or 8th sorry, the 8th.
And she just made a point that I
really do think has come to pass, or
really the evidence backs up, which is that
and Vanessa
seems to have a similar opinion.
That ultimately and oh, and I should add
one more thing. That there are there is
a lot of evidence and reporting around the
time that does clearly signify that there was
an agreement that was happening or about to
happen between all the parties, Turkey and and,
you know, Israel, United States, or, believe more
so, Turkey,
US, and and Syria, and Iran. The point
was
that she's arguing that there was a deal
that was made that was then betrayed.
And so this is actually how I think
this went down. This is still where I
stand on on what this looks like. Is
it ultimately there was an agreement
that there there and I showed you the
Sputnik article the day before yesterday, which seems
to be one of the only places that
reported that Assad at that time had resigned,
which is why you would expect some kind
of a video, which I'll get to in
a second or a statement of, you know,
of of of letter
and call for a peaceful transition. No. He
would I don't think he would do that
if there wasn't some kind of an agreement.
And so the point is that, ultimately, that
there was an agreement under what we just
talked about. That, ultimately, the US as we
as I'll show you right here, actually.
This is from foreign affairs. This is from
the, yesterday.
And all it's simply highlighting is that recently
as a few weeks ago,
Biden's administration was working with the UAE to
lift sanctions on Syria in exchange for Assad
distancing himself from Iran and blocking Hezbollah arm
shipments according to multiple sources. So it as
I understand it, that's ultimately something he turned
down. But the point is they were trying
to find an agreement, and I think what
it came down to was the threat
of after some of the things that happened
that ultimately Assad then said, you know, for
whatever your logic is or I think I
think what Vanessa put forward the idea of
basically trying to minimize casualties and civilians and
whatever you think happened. And, ultimately, they took
the deal. Again, it's all hypothetical, but it
does make sense.
In that moment,
the US, I think, was okay. Well, you're
out of the way, which is all they've
really wanted so they can take further control
and ultimately take the resources at large and
control the different,
land bridges in regard to weapon shipments,
and then potentially balkanize the entire thing and
give Kurdistan to the Kurds and, you know,
the way they're all been planned.
And that would mean that Assad would be
able to step back and they okay. We're
we're that will leave it the where it
is. Then that all of a sudden, in
that moment is when Israel took advantage.
And it does seem to make sense because
it didn't all these different pieces don't seem
to line up right now. And so then
what we're seeing is Israel
brush into Syria for greater Israel projects
and many other reasons and start bombing and
taking control using their terrorist forces.
And then the US was left to sort
of go, hey. Everything's you know, like, you
can see the way they're responding to this.
It's so interesting. And it makes them look
even more stupid than before because they're now
saying that this is somehow okay, that you're
just gonna rush in and take control of
a foreign country even under the guise of
an agreement, which is what they always seem
to do. So I so Sisiem will post
this on the 8th saying that there was
a betrayal from within. I would think that's
Turkey.
After 5 AM Damascus time, Israel launched a
surprise attack. That's what I was saying. And,
of course, all all was said was that
a Zionist coordination, but the idea was that
the back channels were were to deep damask
keep Damascus safe, and Turkey targeted Haaretz HaShal
HaSham. And that's not what happened. And, ultimately,
Israel jammed in and took control of the
area. Instead, there was a coordinated betrayal and
there won't be a slow transition, but rather
there is, like, there was a coup.
Now it could be I mean, some people
pointing to Iran. There's a lot of agreement
right now, it seems, between some of these
pro more so pro Iran elements than they're
saying that Iran tried and
Syria said no. It's interesting. Like, I'm barely
even getting into it because I can't seem
to verify any of it. My worry my
my worry that ultimately, this is the division
tactics playing out
where people are it's like it's breaking the
whole resistance element of this because they're I
like, for example, the not releasing a solid
statement, if that exists, or not doing it
at all, has caused a lot of people
to think that he just gave up and
left. I don't I honestly don't think that
makes sense, but certainly possible.
And so that creates this kind of dynamic
that is causing more rifts, which I think
is by design. But so that's where I'm
gonna leave that as I think that's all
that's what seems to make sense, and now
Israel's continuing to do what it does.
Vanessa pointing out, this was yesterday,
anyone who can explain, she asks, why Assad's
prerecorded
farewell speech
and possible explanation of the catastrophic events was
not aired as planned
after he left the country? Please get in
touch. All the backstabbers who are now turning
against Assad protecting their interests,
you were in a position to say something
for for 14 years. Why didn't you? I
don't blame any of the ordinary people for
adopting the new era. People in Syria are
isolated and afraid. Some are terrified. The mainstream
media vultures are flooding in to claw at
the corpse of one of the oldest civilizations
in the world. History will be revised as
it always is by the victor. As as
I've written in the past, it's history is
written by the winning hand. In only the
victor if only the victor were genuinely Syrian
and grassroots, not a terrorist force incubated by
CIA black sites and empowered by Israel and
the collective western alliance of callous hegemony.
Syria will become a toothless melting pot of
foreign interests, resource looting, and expanding Zionist land
grab. A nation without an army and without
an any military infrastructure is not a nation.
It's a playing field for predators,
which is exactly what it is right now.
The point being, just like Libya
I mean, you might it it
it's by definition a state and our the
map still show it as a state. But
let's realize, it has been long since been
something other than that.
Warring warlords taking over certain territories. I mean,
it's just that's they will never admit that
it stopped being Libya because that then exposes
that they didn't care. Just they they didn't
liberate it like they claimed they did. So
now, we're in the same position.
Where they're already starting to break this up.
People are already starting to divvy things up.
We already have situations where I mean, you
can clearly see what Israel's doing. And now
we're gonna go you we're gonna show you
as we go into the next stage of
this that they're targeting all of the infrastructure
while nobody's resisting.
There it it just it speaks for itself.
They are turning this into a place where
they will continue to use it as a
stepping stone, as a leap as a lee
lily pad as they call it,
and go on pretending like it's a bastion
of freedom now because they took control. Even
though everything you're gonna see shows you the
exact opposite.
Now again, they're considering removing the terrorist name
from the terrorist organization that they've been telling
you are the worst person alive this entire
time.
Removing the $10,000,000 bounty.
Alan McLeod says the same thing about Financial
Times, just showing you how it's everywhere. Every
platform is pointing it out. Headlines like this
underline the fact that, quote, terrorist is nothing
more than a designation the powerful impose on
the powerless.
How many times I made the point about
the Sudan?
There's so many examples like this
where they designate the Sudan a leading terrorist
state sponsor of terrorism,
and you can prove
that whatever you think the case was, the
the situation didn't change.
They simply said, if you normalize with Israel,
we'll remove you from that list, which either
shows they were never terrorists
or they were, and they don't care as
long as they're on their side.
This is how transparent this stuff is today.
Dan Cohen points out and the Al Qaeda
rebrand,
right, which went from Al Musra to Hayat
al Sham. You know? What are the all
different names they jump around and and they
claim they splitting off and they change, they
rebrand, or they rather
what what's the term we're using today? You
know, they they became woke. It It says
the Al Qaeda rebrand did not start last
week. It began several years ago, headed by
Charles Lister who attempted to recast Al Jelani
as a modern day she Che Guevara on
behalf of the UAE, Qatar,
Saudi Arabia paymasters.
Now the entire western media is playing along
with this description.
It's pretty sad.
Now we played this a moment ago in
the opening actually. So I'll play a little
bit of this. Just want you to hear
the point he's making.
Which is always is that they just decide
to change their names
because
Turkey was unhappy. You're their terrorist. Like, okay.
Well, change your name then. And they rebrand
to the Syrian Democratic Forces. Well, that's exactly
the point.
Just like we're seeing they rebrand to Hayat
Tir al Sham. No. It's it's still Al
Qaeda, guys. Al Qaeda is currently the one
they're
allowing to be in power or at least
they're claiming are in power while Israel is
the one controlling it. Here's a gen a
general from the US army,
military telling you
how easy it is to just rebrand their
names.
Is this a good example of That's as
loud as it gets right now, so turn
it up. I won't jump in. How SOCOM
identifies
the enablers on the ground.
And and talk us through that process, how
you select who you think you can really
support and work with.
As you know, sometimes it's of necessity.
Who's available?
The the the one that I think is
most,
most discussed and most misunderstood
is the evolution with our counterpart in Syria,
the the so called Syrian Democratic Forces. Now
interestingly So called. Came about that name because
at one point in time, and I dealt
with them directly, I I was, you know,
on the formative stage of of of the
relationship with these guys. They formally called themselves
the YPG, who the Turks would say equated
to the PKK. You're dealing with a terrorist
enemy of mine. How, you know, how how
can you do that ally? So we literally
played back to them that you gotta change
your brand. What what do you wanna call
yourself besides the YPG?
And with about a day's notice, they declared
that they were the Syrian Democratic Forces.
I thought it was a stroke of brilliance
to put democracy in there somewhere,
but it gave them a little bit of
credibility, and and the interesting part, and I
was lucky to have a great partner in
Brett McGurk out there with me about the
same time, because they were asking for things
that I couldn't give them. And it and
literally was an acknowledgment that they were the
demographic,
dominant,
force in Northern Syria. They wanted a seat
at the table, whether it's at Geneva or
Astana or wherever talks are happening about the
future Syria. And because they had been branded
as PKK, they could never get to the
table. So while while we paired with them
militarily,
Brett McGurk was able to to keep them
in in the in the conversation and and
allow them the, you know, the necessary legitimacy,
to to to be good partners for us.
So It's as simple as that.
There's a stroke of genius to put democratic
in there somewhere. I mean, it's like they
just don't care that you see them. I
I I I think it's a level of
hubris that they, you know,
are get away with it, and they always
have. You're just simply changing their name. Like,
so they realize this is an element that
their ally is not okay with. But, I
mean, it's the same with you.
Hyatt, Tyrell, was just in did just chain
they just rebranded their name because it was
be getting too much attention.
Matt, this interesting point. There's a quick deviation
to the point about Saudi Arabia, but this
is how they keep them protected. So think
Idlib,
even Brett McGurk, whoever else you wanna think
of. So think about their little hot spots
that they keep in power. And, by the
way, where they've kept this group fostered the
entire time until now, they've released them back
out into Syria,
in Idlib and other locations like that. And
it's this just like Matt outlines right here.
He says one of the reasons it's so
hard for Saudi people to overthrow the brutal
house of Saud is because the UK military
has since 1964.
Get this. They've had 11 soldiers
embedded in the White Army, the personal protection
force of the dictators,
to ensure they cannot be displaced.
The UK paper never even mentioned it. The
UK's secret military unit that answers to Saudi
Arabian commanders.
Think about that.
I mean, guys, they're not these are not
secret dictators. These are openly authoritarian dictators. Saudi
Arabia is an open authoritarian dictatorship.
And they act
we scream about not having exact democracy in
places that you don't like. It's it's how
do you possibly pretend this isn't the most
comically stupid thing in the world? On top
of that, the UK has a military unit
that they've had there for decades
to ensure they don't get overthrown.
But we're we're gonna cry foul about a
a I mean, my god. I I I
don't don't even need to make a thousand
other examples
of Venezuela
or Iran or anywhere else where they go,
nope. They cheated. And at least I mean,
realize they've lied about every single one of
those that I can show you as people
that from the US or hundreds of international
observers are there telling you that it was
not illegitimate, and we can prove that we
get cheated every time in this country, regardless
of whether it's all cheated or not. The
point is how we make sense of them
complaining about an election while you are openly
supporting a place that simply doesn't have them.
Or allow Haiti to never have them after
you get what you want. You know, it's
stuff like that. It's just transparent.
Now the ones I showed you, I'll include
a couple of them from from the last
show.
Foreign policy.
Israel's tending to wounded wounded Syrian rebels. We
all should know this, but it seems some
people still haven't seen this. So remember, we're
talking about Syrian rebels
from an article in 2014. We should know
what that means today.
The rebels are the terrorists. That has been
so
overwhelmed I mean, that's been admitted to essentially.
Seeing as how right now those people, the
ones they're telling you were moderate rebels, are
the ones they're telling you in power, but
they they're just
no longer the bad guys. See, because they
know that that cat was let out of
the bag. So they just simply go, oh,
in 2017, he distanced himself from the bad
stuff.
Okay. Well, then that admits that before 2017,
and they were the bad stuff. And we
can prove that you were calling them moderate
rebels at that
time, but we can also prove that they're
not
moderate anything today. They're still just as bad
as before.
UN report reveals collaboration between Israel and the
Syrian rebels, terrorists,
Al Qaeda,
ISIS, inside Israel's secret program
to not just support them, but to give
medical treatment, but to openly back them. I
guess not openly at this point, secretly back
them.
Back ISIS, Al Qaeda.
It's not that hard to wrap your mind
around.
Here's a an a 5 year old video
from Israeli News telling you that they admit
to aiding the Syrian rebels, otherwise known as
terrorists.
In a shocking change of policy, now former
IDF chief of staff, Gavi Isengott, revealed on
Sunday to the British Sunday Times newspaper that
Israel has indeed been supplying weapons and funding
to Syrian rebel groups in the Golan Heights.
These claims have been made many times throughout
the years, but this is the first time
an Israeli official has confirmed such reports. And
it came on the same day that Eisenkod
admitted responsibility for striking, quote, thousands of targets
in Syria as well. Until now, Israel has
only ever discussed humanitarian aid shipment. Every single
one of those strikes are illegal.
Every single one of them. They're just randomly
bombing a foreign country, and the US government
always says they support their right to bomb
because Iran. Well, but Ron being present in
Syria, an ally of theirs, is not a
crime.
That would they would that would necessitate, at
least from the US side, a declaration of
war. But from international law,
the standpoint of the very thing they ignore
everywhere else, that's not legal. But we know
that. They don't care. They don't follow the
law. We should know that by now. And
programs
like Operation Good Neighbor.
Earlier this week Anyway, the point is that
they're admitting Prime minister and defense minister Benjamin
Netanyahu also broke with Israel's tradition of ambiguity
in Syria by adding to Eisinkot's comments. He
confirmed not only that Israel carried out hundreds
of attacks against Iranian and Hezbollah targets, but
also that Israel struck Damascus International Airport last
weekend.
A break A crime in every possible way.
In any case, we're talking about the Syrian
rebels. Right? So a quick throwback as we
make a point about the chemical weapons allegations
today, again, to the video showing you of
the UN rapporteur who is telling you, or
I think the UN investigator,
Carla Del Ponte, who was carrying out those
chemical attacks.
The rebels.
In our investigation
for crimes against humanity and war crimes,
we collect
some
witness testimony
that
that made to appear that,
some
Made to appear means somebody was messing, manipulating.
Chemical weapons were used, in particular,
Nerven gas.
And what was
what appear
on,
to our investigation
that
that was
used by the opponents, by the rebels.
And we have no
no indication
at all
that the government, Syria, the authority of the
Syria government have used chemical weapons.
Now we talked about this so many times
over. Robert Fisk and Seymour Hersh, what I'll
play next,
many, many well respected people from even corporate
media have highlighted the fact that they lied
to us about that. That was one of
the earliest examples. And still to this day,
they they lie about them using it, not
rebels. The rebels are the people that are
currently in control of Syria. The rebels are
the people that they admitted to funding the
moderate rebels who turned out to be extremists
who were cutting children's heads off. It just
can't make this stuff up. And here is
Seymour Hersh, as as Richard's pointing out, who
committed the chemical attack in Gud, Syria in
2013?
Well, not Assad. He says, we knew from
intelligence reports that Saudi Arabia and Turkey were
supplying the basic chemicals for sarin to al
Nusra,
the people currently in charge in charge of
Syria. The sarin used was not the sarin
held by the Syrian military.
Report that Saudi Arabia and Turkey were supplying
the basic chemicals
to Al Nusra, which is ISIS wasn't there
then. I Al Nusra was the cutting edge.
And so there was Linked to Al Qaeda.
Tremendous. Yes. Well, absolutely linked to Al Qaeda.
We always think everything to Al Qaeda because
it was a law passed in 2002 after
the invasion that said, anytime Al Qaeda is
involved, the president can do what he wants
without congress. So we always call everything Al
Qaeda. I mean, everything everything around in
But you see, this is why it's important
to point out law legal versus,
you know, what like, something's actually
legal versus just being law or rather constitutional.
You could pass a law if it's a
plug into the constitution. It's null and void
according to Mayberry versus Madison, a supreme court
president.
The point is that
passing a law that says we if we
just say Al Qaeda's there, that we don't
have to go through congressional checks and balances
is
it's unconstitutional.
But 1 by 1, step by step, we've
seen these things get eroded
or rather just them continue to not acknowledge
inherent god given rights.
Who does that who does that interest exactly?
Does it help Americans? Does it help the
US government? No. It helps a foreign country
at the expense of Americans.
In Libya, it was Al Qaeda. In, throughout
Africa, we use Al Qaeda because that gives
you the cover of the law. Congress passed
that stupid act, giving Bush the right to
intervene anywhere without going congressional
authorization. It's an amazing piece of legislation.
Talk about dumb. Anyway, the point is, this
report troubled everybody. There was a study done
about what can we do about it. How
many people, American soldiers, we should we didn't
want Al Nusa to have nerve agents. Suddenly
comes this attack,
and we get a sample from the Russians,
and it's taken to,
sir Peter Wall, who is the the director
gen the head of the British military. The
sample is taken to his people. Porton down.
Yeah. They go take it to Porton down
where they they conclude, we know what the
Syria has. Syria has been signed been a
signature to the Geneva Convention on chemical weapons.
We we know what Syria has. We know
what it looks like. And what was used
in that place was not the same as
in the Syrian military. This is told to
Obama 2 times
by the the chairman of the joint chiefs
before he the reason he didn't bomb. Remember
the red line? When when the attack took
place.
So when the attack took place, it allegedly
1400 was 1 tenth as many, it doesn't
matter. When the attack took place and people
were killed and the world said Bashar Assad
did it, my government said that. The government
knew.
They knew from this very important intelligence report
that caused a huge study to be done
inside about what to do about it. It
would take 60,000 troops to get into the
war. We were thinking maybe sending troops on
the side of Bashar, really, to get rid
of this stuff. We didn't want these guys
to have it. And of course, there was
too many troops, and it didn't happen. But
they knew there were 2 suspects
that knew Al Nusa had the stuff and
Syria had the stuff. Forget about having it
analyzed. They knew right away, and they only
talked about one. And so I read an
article saying, wow. Let's hold on, folks.
What I also learned, because I was writing
months later, is that the material that was
taken by Russia, Russian intelligence
So think about what he's saying in general.
The idea that we're
being like, to me, that sounds like like,
if there's if that's factually correct, which is
hard to say, that Obama was, you know,
why that would make sense. Right? If if
I would see him as part of the
same agenda. What's interesting is it seems
it would my personal opinion, which is that's
all you're gonna get because with these are
all, you know, taking that at face value
and then then making an opinion about what
he's saying. Let's put it that way. It
seems to suggest the same thing that I've
seen in the past where even though the
US and Israel are
tangible or, you know, technically on the same
side and in the same agenda,
often enough, Israel still takes advantage of the
United States. And it still seems to get
away with it. And the US looks the
other way. I think it's because they're compromised.
But my point is, in this case, you
can see that they're, you know, they're still
they're in a similar agenda in what's going
on in Syria, but then you wonder whether
or not Obama was starting to recognize that
even then within that, Israel was trying to
abuse that.
And he's even arguing that they were thinking
about putting troops in to stop that. I'm
thinking that's what that was Syria's agenda, just
like every one of them.
Or I'm sorry. Excuse me. Israel's agenda. The
point is that you I think that's Israel
playing that role through this and maybe Obama
was trying to, you know, I don't know,
recognizing that he was being played even though
they're on the same side. It's hard to
tell. Either way, they're all responsible for this,
guys. In the end of the day, what
he's telling you is that
they're they're working with the bad guys. I
mean, it's very simple.
And it goes all the way back. It
goes it goes a long way back. And
they've always been trying to blame Assad. And
it doesn't mean Assad is completely
free of any guilt of any crime. But
you have to realize, it's even if you
think he's the most guilty person alive, he's
not guilty of the crimes they're using to
bring him down.
And if they have to use crimes that
he didn't make or crimes he didn't commit,
then maybe ask whether he's what they say
at all.
Now getting into that point about who they're
funding to do this, and it's the same
people that are currently in power and the
overarching point that Israel and the United States,
not just now, but have always been working
with funding, arming, and supporting Al Qaeda, ISIS.
In fact, they're a proxy element of both
of them. Now this shared
I don't know why that does that on
this platform. Hold you'll see it if I
refresh real quick.
Right there. See, it pops up. But I
don't think they like certain people. And so
this person who's, you know, pro Palestine,
just take note. That does it it goes
away. That's not supposed to be how that
works.
You see it right there, boom, from, and
then disappears.
This platform is very selective in the way
that it censors.
But shout out to Saeed Mohammed Morandi for
sharing this.
ISIS patches
on full display
on US Israeli Turkey backed terrorists who are
already killing religious minorities in Syria. Now this
video, it's not if I could play it
in full, I just think it's it's harsh
enough as it is. They openly
assassinate these people right in front of you.
There's somebody dead on the ground. These are
the same forces that the US and Israel
are openly supporting. In fact, bombing
a long for.
So you can there's a couple early examples.
They kill these 2 people right here.
Now look. Even if you're gonna pretend that
these are somehow terrorists they're killing, there's supposed
to be a process to this. If you
wanna pretend this is these are the good
guys or this is democracy or whatever you
claim. The truth is it's obvious that these
are members of ISIS that the US and
Israel have empowered and are killing religious minorities.
It's what you're gonna see.
Now right away, you can see this guy
wearing an ISIS badge right in the middle
of his chest, right there.
It's pretty obvious.
That's the image I have right there.
But the the most clear one is at
the end.
So they're laughing.
These people are on the
ground,
and they shoot them, and kill them right
in front of everybody,
and you can see the guy's patch right
there.
And this is so by far not the
I mean, there's so many examples to this.
It's incredible.
Here's the most obvious one that this this
is this oh, actually, with this one here.
So
this picture,
Middle East Observer simply says what Benjamin Netanyahu
said, we want relations with the new regime
in Syria.
This this min show sent simply goes Netanyahu
eager to develop relations with good old friends.
So just to be clear, because I made
sure to check this. This is a new
image from Syria. This is from December 9,
2024.
This never didn't show up anywhere else before
that.
Just make sure you look at what you're
seeing here, guys, because this these are the
forces that and the other important point to
make here, there's no resistance right now.
They they backed away. So the forces you're
gonna see are backed by the US and
Israel. Now what you're gonna we're gonna get
into the game they're playing, which is essentially
trying to pretend they're bombing ISIS.
The the old that's what you're looking at,
guys. The forces that they're pointing to when
they've said it in the past are these
guys. Idlib, Al Qaeda, the same thing. Now
there's differences between these groups that I don't
go into explicitly because it just becomes I
honestly think that there's less overlap than they
pretend. Or, I mean, the less deviation than
they pretend.
Either way, like, the SDF has different roots
versus the,
high Charles Scham or Al Nusra or ISIS
element. The point is, though, there's very clear
overlaps to all of it. And what we're
staring at are groups that the US and
Israel
have supported
as long as they've been doing this in
the context of Syria. Like, this is what
we're staring at. These forces that they support.
Here is Iraqi Christian Foundation
saying Al Qaeda ISIS terrorists who have taken
over Syria drive through Christian neighborhoods in Damascus
waving an ISIS flag, shooting bullets, and trying
to intimidate ancient Syrian Christian community.
This is today.
There you go.
Shoot. It doesn't drive by.
Always with the Toyota trucks. Interesting.
There's the big Isis flags.
Not that one, but the first one right
there.
Right there.
So
this is the Iraqi Christian Foundation,
And there is so many examples going back.
In in Ukraine was the main point. You
could see constantly that they were having because
these are the same elements that they're using
all over the place.
Patrick Henningson points out, looks like the Al
Qaeda boss of the head chopping Islamic State
of Idlib.
That's why we shared a lot of this
to begin with to recognize it's currently the
overlap here.
Mohammed Al Bashir will be heading Syria's new
transitional government.
Now understand, Gulani is currently in power,
but they're pretending they're gonna use a transitional
government process to elect somebody.
Well, realize the only people even in positions
for power right now are all their terrorist
organization friends. So it says,
it promises to be a joyful transition with
lots of freedom, thieving, and long bread lines.
He says, by the way, good luck holding
those democratic elections sometime in 2026
if there's a cohort Syria state by or
coherent Syrian state by then. I'm more of
the minds that are gonna rush out some
illusion of something. Either way,
it's are we are really gonna pretend like
they would risk allowing somebody to vote vote
in somebody that they don't have control over?
I mean, come on, guys. We can't be
this naive today. And the obvious reality is
they're that's what he's pointing to is this
is a person who is part of the
terrorist organization they're always telling you they're fighting,
who is now taking charge of the transitional
element while Ghilani, who's also a terrorist, has
control of Syria.
Well, yet again, here's,
geez. Oh my gosh. I it's so funny
how that happens sometimes.
Craig Murray. This something just jumps out of
your head all of a sudden. Here's Craig
Murray
telling you
for the 4 45th time over the last
so many days that this is an element
of Israel and the United States.
And we have
a new
regime starting to take shape
in Syria,
which is primarily
Jihadist,
which is being hilariously presented in the West
as democratic and reformist
when it is
anything but,
and which was financed
and organized
by
Turkey, the United States, Israel,
and the Gulf States.
None of which has lifted a finger
to help
the Palestinians. And in fact, the bulk of
which of course is the coalition which is
actually committing the genocide of the Palestinians. So
that's what's happening today and I want you
to not be in any doubt about what
is happening
and why it is happening. And there's nothing
to do with democracy,
nothing to do with human rights.
It's all to do
with greater Israel
and the genocide of the Palestinians.
I'm glad to know there's some honest people
out there.
Well, he also points out this clip that
we played yesterday, which is pretty wild. This
is a guy's a former head of Mi
6 who is, who who went on Sky
News
and literally said that they used to map
out all these bad groups. And hi, Cheryl
Sean was one of the worst. But we've
watched them change, and now they're better. And
so now we should I mean, it it's
just incredible to me. And he may Craig
makes an a great point on this. What
I said last time was, like, what about
the crimes they committed?
You're the one that told us they were
committing crimes, and now they just changed their
ways and we just ignored that they were
chopping children's heads off?
It's it just doesn't make any sense to
anybody with a brain and not blinded by
partisanship. And Craig makes an excellent point with
the craziness that's going on in the UK
right now. He says absolutely, plainly, and beyond
dispute. John Sowers, the person in this clip,
is here expressing an opinion which supports
or could cause another person to support
the prescribed
organization, Hyatt Sheryl Shom,
currently diagnosed as a terrorist organ or
a registered as a as a terrorist organization.
Right? So by their laws,
he should be arrested.
It says contrary to section 12 of the
terrorism act,
up to 12 years in or 14 years
in jail. He will not be visited by
police. This draconian law is politically applied only
to supporters of Palestine.
So the point is that right now, it
the group that's in control and the group
he's talking about, Hyatt Sheryl Shum, is a
registered,
documented terrorist organization.
And he who know whether you even think
that's the truth or not is irrelevant to
the point. It's that they say they are.
And I I think I'd agree that with
that. But the point is,
to do what he just did is the
exact definition of their law.
Supporting or causing someone to support. He's actually
petitioning you to support them.
Pretty obvious it only applies one way.
Even as they are debt currently that way.
Now, here here is Eric Prince on 9th,
who just highlights some things I think are
worth pointing out, showing you the opinion of
all of these, you know, whatever you wanna
call, what the group you think they're in.
I just see them all as the kind
of technocratic globalist drive. He says it's far
from certain that whatever replaces Assad will be
an improvement,
which you gotta love how that's the argument
that we don't like him, so get him
out of the way. But we don't even
know it's gonna be better, but, you know,
revolution.
And also that they're so obviously telling you
that they did this, Netanyahu
proudly telling you they did this, but then
over here telling us that it was a
revolution organic because they want freedom.
It just shows you their hubris gets the
better they just need to say, you know,
we're in control. Even if it challenges the
narrative, but they don't care because even when
you see that they're committing genocide and they
just lie about it, they just nothing changes.
And it's saying that the,
over, evil
evil will be better over his current situation
and that,
some other already fighting other others in the
area. The strongest of the rebel factions, Hyatt
Yerushalm, whose leader is trying to rebrand as
a statesman. He even changed his name on
Telegram just like we told you before. Hey.
Now I'm somebody new to much more responsible
sounding name and and promised to the protect
the rights of Christians and women as they're
currently not doing either of those things. It
says the US pounded the Islamic State targets
in Eastern Syria
to prevent the jihadists
from filling the power vacuum.
Right? So the same groups.
Like, realize, that's the point. Regardless of how
they try to make them different,
technically, there are differences. They're working together and
have been for a very long time and
are ultimately the same thing in the context
of the conversation.
So they're bombing over here.
The US has also been exchanging secret messages
with Hayatir al Sham via Turkish intermediaries.
So now you're communicating, as we've already told
you, with the terrorist organization, who's currently
on a list of terrorist organizations and who
you have a $10,000,000
bounty for.
It says the US still considers them a
terrorist group. But guess what, guys? The lesser
of evil.
See, if you thought for a minute that
was just a unique thing to the election,
no. That that's your that's the world view
now.
He's not as bad as that terrorist group,
so we're gonna pretend they're the good guy.
Sound good?
They're all the same thing. They're all US
Israeli proxy elements that are the worst of
the worst. It says meanwhile, Israeli troops crossed
into Syria from the Golan Heights to prevent
jihadists from solidifying control of the border regions.
Well, who's that?
That's Hyattar al Sham.
Because you're that that's exactly the same spot
because Hyattar al Sham is the one that
went right up to the border of Israel
and then said, nope. We're good. We like
Israel.
But Israel's claiming they have to do all
this to stop the jihadists that in every
other context we're claiming is a revolution for
freedom because good guy.
They are either really this bad at this
or they simply just don't care. I think
it's both.
Israel also took advantage of, the departure to
carry out air strikes on suspected chemical weapons
areas. Now that's just a lazy overlap to
make some kind of a narrative. Well, chemical
weapons. And the people will gobble it up.
They don't wanna look at what's going on.
Now while they're all supporting that, including the
prince MAGA right wing overlap dynamic,
Jalani,
the
former leader of Al Qaeda, and now and
by the way, also was working with ISIS,
was also working with I mean, many different
overlaps that you can prove. He is now
the leader of Hajj al Sham. He delivered
a speech declaring
the leader of Syria as in his the
the he he's the leader of Syria, and
it's an Islamic nation. It says the statement
underscores his commitment to a vision of Syria
governed by Sharia law.
Is that what you guys were all screaming
about, freedom and democracy?
Was it was this what weren't you guys
just the ones telling us that this was
the worrisome thing? Well, realize that that comes
to pass when the people you're fighting with
win.
That's how that works. Not because of Iran,
not because of Syria,
because of anything other than Israel and US
forces that they put into power. So when
you realize that whether we're talking about vest
bombs and and suicide killings, these are all
10 these are all examples
of what Zionism and the US have brought
to you.
I've played that before actually from this academic
that talks about this.
Apparently, the Zionists have used it and brought
it in fact to the area. Terrorism as
we know it today, the planting of bombs
and marketplaces and so on and so forth,
was in fact introduced into the Middle East
by the Zionists in the twenties.
But the net result of of Zionist,
terrorism and and violence in the in the
1st 3rd of 20th century has brought forth,
to my mind, the the anomaly,
the
horrific and
unacceptable status in the Middle East today of
the state of Israel, which is in fact
an armed garrison state, which now exports more
arms and distributes violence all around the world,
vastly disproportionate to its size. I mean, in
that respect, I think it's a it's it's
a horrible cycle of of violence. But in
it all, I think the Palestinian is the
victim. That's our question about that. Isn't it
also interesting as someone's comment in the chat
that every single year of
Christmas, Israel attacks Syria every year
on Christmas.
And now, they've decided to overthrow it right
before Christmas. I think that's very telling.
But any case,
it's interesting
that we just showed the video yesterday in
Aleppo where they're saying, now, we have Sharia
law. You currently have an interesting overlap. Now
there's there's a lot of conservatives that are
calling this out,
which I'm glad to see. But the Republican
team sport Trump side seems to be screaming
revolution, freedom, Syria is better now because Trump
or whatever they're trying to overlap it with,
while these people are going Sharia law. These
are the Israeli US supported elements.
I just think that's important to highlight.
Here is what they were saying 30 seconds
ago,
you know, facetiously. It's the same point that
we said with Azov movement and Ukraine,
all hyping up the narrative about the evil
Ukrainian narratives or you've narratives. Ukrainian Nazis that
were
very not very not even subtly trying to
make it look like a Russia was doing
it right up until it got very much
exposed by people like myself that it was
after the CIA that grew with those top
Nazis in Ukraine, and the whole thing, they
just deviated. Now it's like, well, never mind.
Now they're not terrorists. Now they're not Nazis.
Same thing. Al Qaeda and ISIS,
existential threat to the US and Europe,
except now. Because now we don't but now
they do what we like. It's all just
narrative, guys. It's all an agenda to to
drive you into a certain position.
Pepe Escobar writes massive plot twist. Now to
be clear, as we've covered in the last
couple of shows on this, the Hyatt Sheryl
Shom was immediately saying, we like Israel, and
Israel's on our side, and and we're gonna
work with them. And meanwhile, continuing to ignore
say, we're gonna give up on the Palestinian
issue. We're gonna let them keep the goal
on Hyatt. It's, like, showing you that they're
not in the interest of even themselves. So
they are not what they claim. This is
a proxy element of the people we're talking
about.
But now, which I think is very telling,
now that this whole thing this is what
what is the thing I keep saying about
Israeli propaganda? What's the one word I keep
using? Do you remember?
Reactive.
It continues
to be clumsy to where they I mean,
it it seems to be always what they
do. But in this case, they
either just aren't smart enough to think through
the first couple steps, and so they're out
there going, yay, Israel. We love Israel. That's
very jaw jarring from what they were telling
us, that they were fighting those people. And
now
they woah. Woah. Chain. Now say it like
this. That's what I'm getting from this.
Suddenly, they come out and go,
we're gonna go after Israel next.
These are the same people. In fact, literally
the same people in some of these videos.
It says the NATO Israeli Turk head chopping
army are now promising the Palestinians they're coming
to liberate Gaza.
And and then and they say,
where was it? Oh, this was there's another
there's a couple of these he put out.
So in this case, they're going, we're coming
to help Palestine even though they just before
were saying, never mind. We don't care because
Israel. And also saying we're gonna not fight
them. We're gonna stop at the border of
of Golan Heights because all these things they
said publicly.
And this now, they're saying, we're gonna come
help Gaza. And in other videos, they're saying,
we're gonna help right now, we're gonna come
for Jerusalem next.
Oh, elevate. He doesn't include it right there,
but it's it's all over the place.
How does that make sense? Other than they
saw that the narrative wasn't connecting, and so
they just changed the narrative.
It's very obvious.
So the very people on the ground we're
talking about are committing atrocities
immediately just unfortunately like we expected. As Vanessa
Billie writes from the 8th, the, quote, freedom
fighters
on the streets are the terrorists who slit
throats, hung fetuses in trees, and sawed off
the heads of their captives. Now realize, these
were documented things, not the Israeli atrocity propaganda
BS that we got for October 7th. Now
it says, massacres entire ethnic communities and stood
on their remains drunk on bloodlust.
Oh, she video shown videos of most of
this stuff. They are the dregs of society
whose first instinct is to damage and destroy.
Gangs will fight gangs. Law and order is
gone. Children are stealing got guns and firing
them. Sectarian hatred is seeping back. People are
terrified. This is the, quote, revolution.
The west doesn't breed stability.
It breeds hate, chaos, and war. Israel is
the greatest evil on the earth today and
now is unleashed unfettered and on the move
unhindered.
Bravo, freedom fighters. Dumb
I don't know what that is. Sayon sayon,
I'm I'm sure that's a probably
a searing word.
The point, obviously and and I let's be
clear, she's talking about the western governments. The
problem is well, I can't let's speak for
her. I would think that's what she's speaking
toward.
Is that it's obvious what we're dealing with
here. These are the worst people of the
world that are being allowed to be framed
as the freedom fighters, shave democracy and freedom.
Well, you can prove that's happening out of
places that they then call them terrorists. It's
because they're in the interest of fighting for
freedom.
They need you to think that. They're
I mean, history is overwhelmingly clear.
They will sell out anything
to achieve their goal and just yell the
word freedom. And now we're watching it play
out, unfortunately.
So,
all, Ali Abudomah from s telecom electronic at
the FADA highlights what we were afraid was
gonna happen. Summary execution videos coming out of
Syria
are consistent with Hayat al Sham and Jalani
at what they've done in the past and
other US backed Al Qaeda groups that have
done before. And it will be hard for
the Gilani has reformed western media to spit
away, so expect them just to ignore it.
And as the squirrel points out, as we
heard many of them reference already, the as
Alex Karp was talking about the dungeons and
people trapped. Well, what about the dungeons in
Turkey? What about the dungeons in the UAE?
You you, the United
Arab Emirates that they were you putting Yemenis
in. Or rather in in Yemen that they
were using, in both, actually.
The horrifying stories we got of using waffle
irons and and rape as coercive tools. Or
like we saw in Israel. Or as he
highlights here, the dungeons in Idlib.
You know, the group that from the very
the people they do you just scream? We're
freedom fighters.
There's horrifying information. This is written by The
Guardian.
Protest in Northwest Syria marked 13 years since
the start of the democracy or fight for
democracy.
It says,
where was it?
Was that the one? Yeah. Right there. Disappeared
into Hyatt Hirasham Prison 6 years ago. Her
son. And she has not heard from them
since.
This sound like freedom fighters? This is 2024,
guys. The article is from March of 2024
saying her children were kidnapped by the very
group that they're cheering on saving democracy in
in Syria.
Syrian protesters are rising up against Islamists in
Idlib.
It's just sad. The point is that these
people
are supporting exact well, you think Alex Karp
doesn't know what he's supporting?
He's okay with it because either he hates
these people because of their skin color or
because of how he was radicalized growing up
in his wherever he grew up in the
context of Crowley's real mindset.
Sad.
Here are some actual coverage. This is Megatron
reporting this from the 8th. Right away, by
the way. Hi, Tram share hi, Terrell
Sham, terrorists,
Al Qaeda, so it's simple, who have taken
over Syria have started public executions across the
country.
Ukraine.
It,
Fiera Fiorella Isabelle points out, rejoice secular liberals
and pro Palestinian anti Assad counts. The, quote,
democracy
that never existed in, quote, dictator Assad has
finally come in the form of beheadings, religious
persecutions,
forced political betrayal, and the end of hope
for a truly free Gaza. Islamic extremists are
already torturing Syrian Christian minorities.
Is this hot spot media reporting this?
Tell me this looks like how does this
look any different than what you were just
seeing the IDF do in Gaza? It's not.
These are Syrian Christians
who are being tortured by the people that
the US and Syria or US and Israel
have
put into power.
The savior makes a thread.
Public executions that have taken place so far
just today
in Syria or at least that he saw
today.
This is the one I was showing you
earlier. These ISIS members with the patches and
everything openly executing
religious minorities.
Al Qaeda forces continue to execute Assad supporters.
Now don't forget, guys. What what was the
corporate media shoving down your throat 2 days
ago? That they said amnesty for everybody because
we're a democracy.
They say whatever they need to say to
get the narrative going so the media can
shove it down your throat.
They're
you know what this looks like? It looks
the same way it did in Gaza. It
looks the same way it did in Ukraine.
It looks the same way it does everywhere
they operate
because that's how they work.
Hi, Terrell Shaw. I'm about to execute another
high ranking SSA officer in Hamas because
amnesty,
That was their point. They said anybody from
Assad's group, amnesty. That's not what's happening.
Thousands gather in Hamas Square to witness Hayat
Shal Sham Terrace execute a known Syrian Arab
army officer without a fair trial.
More members of the Syrian Arab army, supporters
of Assad are being executed by ISIS and
Al Qaeda terrorists.
Fighters of the moderate SNA forces, moderate in
quotes, execute 2 Curtis SCF soldiers in their
hospital beds.
Now realize these are things they're posting.
Even more suspected SSA members are currently being
executed by ISIS forces.
Guys, I'll you can include this. You can
watch all these for yourself.
And she's not fun to watch people being
murdered. Supporters of Assad and SSA members are
literally being executed everywhere, all across Syria.
And you you have to remember, guys, this
is today.
K? There is no resistance. There's nobody fighting
back. There is no and they are just
murdering people,
including civilians, which we'll get to in a
second as Syria continues to be bombed by
Israel while nobody's fighting back. Make sense of
that other than just murdering people.
This is another execution conducted
by Hayat al Sham's terrorists in Syria.
Right in the head.
Or shot right in front of us.
It's disgusting.
Hi. It's your al Sham's sub faction calling
itself,
Magawir al
Sham, enters religious minority villages in Homs, countryside,
and, quote, cleanse them of Alawites.
This is what we've expected every time in
the past with these groups. This is what
they did before.
In this video, an individual was heard saying,
Al Akbar, the group, the Maguar, Al Sham,
the Nusra village has been cleansed. And you
see this is the point, guys. You don't
see this with the groups that they're pointing
to. You don't see this with the Iranian
groups. You don't see this I mean, there
are elements of this anywhere in the world,
just extremism, not exactly like this. But you'll
find I mean, sure as hell find this
right through the Zionist organizations.
The point is that what they're telling you
are these.
All the groups they wanted, the Syrian government,
the Iranian government,
while their groups that they fund and are
proudly telling you are reformed are the ones
openly praising their terrorist activities.
This is the one you already saw. More
people shared this if they're just shooting a
random person in a bed.
Now at the same time,
the the ones they've
the I don't even wanna call it. The
Hyatt Yerushalom freedom fighters
and the group and the like, here's the
point is, we're supposed to believe that these
people have now liberated the country. Right? Well,
it's then why is everything in chaos? Why
are they shooting people in the streets? Why
are they tearing the burning buildings down? Why
is the central bank being openly looted by
the very people you're telling us have taken
control?
Because that's what's happening.
People are running out with bags full of
money and who knows what, gold bars.
Look, some of those are pretty heavy.
And
this person simply makes a good point.
Says, Syria Central Bank is looted, creating overnight
millionaires. Seen it before? Ask Tom Cotton about
it from Iraq.
That's him in Iraq.
A lot of money was stolen from that
place.
Lastly, on this, I just think it's funny
to point this out. I was just mentioning
this. Typical partisan media using things and manipulating
people.
Wall Street,
Mav, I guess, it's that's a new name
for him, I guess, says,
which armed group won the war in Syria?
Very, very either they're this unformed or using
this to oversimplify something. This is an old
article, by the way, from during Trump's administration.
Funny how they cut that part out. It's
from 2016.
It says the one backed by the CIA,
or the one backed by the Pentagon? Or
was it the one backed by Saudi Arabia,
or was it ISIS? I'm so confused. Los
Angeles Times. In Syria, militias armed by the
Pentagon fight those armed by the CIA. I
was just talking about this.
Well, they would love for you to think
this must be now.
It's not though. This is an article from
the The Daily Times from the 2016.
Now, yes, this was started before Trump was
into power. The point is, as we just
showed you, this well, all the way through
his administration,
it never stopped.
So when you can show this this article
about this, ask yourself why they would crop
this to make it look like a new
article. And why Elon Musk would share it
and say our tax dollars are somehow funding
both sides again.
Either they're this lazy or they're trying to
make you think it's happening now, which, by
the way, it still is in a in
a very broad way. The point is they're
all doing it.
Trump's Pentagon,
NCAA, we're doing the same thing.
And by the way, whether or not this
has been the same dynamic up until now
is questionable.
I'm of the mind that this was a
a clumsy thing that happened and that made
them look really stupid. The point is the
CIA and the Pentagon are arguably in the
same direction of what they're trying to accomplish
in the large picture.
So for them to frame it like this
is is it interest of their administration,
of their perception, of how this is how
bad and confused they all are. We're gonna
fix everything. I'm just telling you. It's gross
how openly manipulative they are.
Don't you think you'd wanna know that this
was something that was going on during Trump's
administration? Or was maybe, I don't know, 8
years ago? Or what is it? More than
that,
10 years ago.
Right? I mean, it's pretty strange. Right? Or
what was it? What what did I say
the date was on this?
2016.
So the point is that this is clearly
being used in a way now that what
they want you to think that it's something
from recent, which you could argue this isn't
even how it turned out. They ended up
aligning and
they you know what I'm saying? I just
I'm so frustrated. Now they have a right
to lie or be wrong all they want.
I'm just trying to highlight how they're rising
up the ones who are deliberately wrong or
dishonest or terrible what they do.
Collectively, what? I don't know. Elon's got what?
How many 1,000,000 followers now? 207,000,000?
That's ridiculous.
Just use your discernment, guys. Recognize that most
of these partisan screamers on Twitter are actively
misleading you even by accident half the time.
So Biden says the fall of Assad is
a fundamental act of justice.
Right? It's an act of it's act of
justice to allow a head chopping Islamic terrorism
group that you have funded into power to
be able to frame any Islam that way
or any any anything brown that way,
that group taking power is a fact of
justice, really, as they continue to murder people.
I mean, I think he probably knows that.
It doesn't matter.
As Derek writes or points out, this article
from 2022
seems relevant.
Syrian foreign minister from 2022,
minister Mac Mac Makdad
calls for a new world order.
Western powers wanted Syria to change Israel policy
or face consequences, he says.
Very revealing. It says, quote, at the United
Nations where
I served as Syrian ambassador for 11 years,
the western country said that that we should
change our policies toward Israel or face consequences.
See see, that's that's the Karp mentality.
Do what we want or you're gonna suffer.
Is that what everyone thinks the world's supposed
to be like? Okay. Imagine if that was
in the if this if the situations were
reversed.
Well, it's certainly possible Russia or China have
a lot of power. What if they decide
to act that way? Why would it be
would it be wrong if they act that
way? Is it only right to force countries
to do what you want if you pretend
you have a moral high ground?
See my point? Like, it's all subjective.
For so, if they were coming at us
and saying we're gonna make you scared every
day of your life because that's the only
way we could be free, is it wrong
for them to do that?
In their in their minds, it is because
we're the only ones that have the
the the right to be in that position.
It's just it is. It's imperial hubris. It
really is, as a our our own attorney
wrote.
But the point,
they're threatening this country to change because they
want for Israel.
Is that in the interest of world peace?
Is that in the interest of anything other
than what Israel wants from the United States?
It says, mister Magdeb revealed this, that the
Assad government confrontation con,
forintationist
policy,
towards Israel played a role behind the prolonged
conflict in Syria. It is arguing for a
new world system. Syrian minister said illegal intervention
in the sovereign affairs of a developing country
should not be tolerated, obviously. He definitely said,
this is so ridiculous. You guys see that?
There's no reason that should happen. I'm right
here. Click this.
Platform really sucks. And it says, we can't
import wheat, and we can't grow sufficient food
as the US is occupying northeastern parts of
Syria.
Our oil wells are in the northeast Syrian.
Americans are selling oil from that area to
Turkey and separatist groups, which they then use
to help those groups take down Syria.
Supporting forces that targeted Syria. He cautioned that
the groups that targeted Syria could also target
Turkey.
And to to be clear, I do think
this platform is ridiculous and bad in a
lot of ways. But as always, regardless of
its functionality, it's the real time information that
makes it important.
Whether it's because of Twitter or not, it's
because it is a sit it is the
like, like I would argue any of the
other platforms that this much engagement, it'd be
the same concept.
That's that's why it's valuable because even as
they censor it, you can get real time
information.
Before I play this though, I'm gonna play
that clip I put up before on the
on the on that same point.
Ultimately, the idea here
where which was the main thing,
threatening these countries to do what they want
and for a foreign country.
Very important to understand where that really comes
from.
But this starts and it's it's really fascinating
to go back. It starts, in
1996 with Netanyahu
who wrote a book called Fighting,
Terrorism.
And the thesis of the book is, quite,
straightforward
and,
and and,
very dangerous. He says, you know, there are
there's Hamas, there's Hezbollah. They oppose Israel.
It's not good for us to fight them
directly.
That that won't work.
What we need to do is topple
the governments
that's that back them. So what we need
is regime change throughout the Middle East.
And he actually gave a long list of
7 countries,
that included,
Syria,
Libya,
Iraq,
Iran,
Somalia,
Sudan, and Lebanon.
And systematically,
the United States has done Netanyahu's bidding for
almost 30 years now going to war
with every one of them except for the
big one, that Netanyahu so much longs for,
which is the war directly
between the United States and Iran. About 10
days after 9:11, I went through the Pentagon,
and I saw secretary Rumsfeld
and
and deputy secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just
to say hello to some of the people
on the joint staff who used used to
work for me. And one of the generals
called me and he said, sir, you gotta
come in you gotta come in and talk
to me a second. I said, well, you're
too busy. He said, no. No. He says,
we've made the decision we're going to war
with Iraq.
This was on or about the 20th September.
So, I said, well, did they find some
information collect connecting Saddam to Al Qaeda? He
said, no. No. He says, there's nothing new
that way. They just made the decision to
go to war with Iraq. He said, I
guess it's like we don't know what to
do about terrorists, but
we've got a good military and we can
take down governments. And, he said, I guess
if the only tool you have is a
hammer, every problem has to look like a
nail.
So I came back to see him a
few weeks later,
and by that time, we were bombing in
Afghanistan. I said, are we still going to
war with Iraq? And he said, oh, it's
worse than that. He said, he reached over
on his desk. He picked up a piece
of paper. He said, I just he said,
I just got this down from upstairs, meaning
the secretary of defense office today, and he
said, this is a memo that describes how
we're gonna take out
7 countries
in 5 years,
starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon,
Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off Iran.
It's what we're doing. It's what the US
government is doing. It's very transparent. You combine
that with everything else we've talked about in
this conversation even just from today. It makes
it incredibly obvious. Now, I wanna go back
to the point, this is the day after
Assad, December 9th, and they're just highlighting that
they had a deal they were working on.
Right? The Biden administration was already working to
try to have Assad step aside or at
the very least stop working with the Iran
and Libya or le Lebanon, excuse me. And
so the point is that
people, you know, looking back to the situation.
All the people celebrating.
I made this point a lot yesterday or
last show, but this is just another example
combat points out. This person saying, I asked
myself, why did I topple Saddam statue?
Is the guy talking about the that he
did it? I put it back up if
I could. I was so happy the day
Americans came, he said. Then things started get
to get worse. Saddam was gone but in
his place, we got 1,000 sedams. Iraq has
been stolen from us.
It's the same thing.
I just wish we could be honest about
that.
Now as Afshar and Rafsani from going underground
points out, propaganda media outlets in NATO countries
are continuously repeating
the lies that 90% of Syrians lived in
poverty by the end of Bashar al Assad's
rule. Now there's some level of truth to
it. But just like with Venezuela, you could
prove that before they started destroying the country,
that was not the reality. It was fact
as as we just showed you in the
thread, it was the opposite.
And but but the reality is that just
like with Venezuela
or Iran, they actively go these things and
then turn around and blame them for why
they're like
that. Sanctions, attacks, destabilization,
food supply chain manipulation, and then they go,
look at how they're starving. They can't even
keep care of their people. It's disgusting.
And he writes, what they won't tell you
is that the US occupied the area of
Syria with most of its oil and gas
fields as we keep pointing to and that's
what even Trump says. We took the oil
and systematically looted those oil and gas reserves
for years.
Let me see.
I thought I had it right there.
Let's see.
My message
Guess not. That's crazy. I could have swore
that I saved that. Any case, I just
pled just 2 days ago that, you know,
Trump is on the record saying, we took
the oil. We told you to stay for
the oil. And he says, and systematically looted
these oil and gas reserves for years, which
in turn denied Assad's
government vital revenue to sustain the Syrian economy
and created chronic fuel shortages. I mean, that
alone, guys,
is obvious to see what would be the
repercussions of that. The people will suffer.
But, of course, the western
elitist class,
the the media class, the partisan class just
cannot or is incapable
of being honest about this because it does
not suit their interests.
On top of this, they won't even mention
the crippling sanctions either, which has been a
popular tool in the regime change toolkit for
the US to create conditions so unbearable that
it leads to the population turning on their
own government. Just like I played from Giuliani
the other day saying that we people are
starving and that's what leads to a good
revolution.
It's like they know what they're doing.
Richard Medhurst points out many Syrians preferred Assad
purely because of his foreign policy, not domestic.
How can anyone in the US empire who
boycotted Kamala and Trump over Gaza criticize Syrians
who also put foreign policy and Palestine first?
This is hypocritical and contradiction of positions.
He says the irony
that
the irony is that Syria had free health
care and education under Saad,
stability and security just like Iraq and Libya
did. Americans have nothing. I mean, you could
disagree with that, but the truth point is
that you can't pretend like like, with like,
Libya is the great example.
Free health care, free education, highest quality of
life in all of Africa,
going towards a gold backed dinar, and they
destroy it all and claim that he they
liberated them, and it became an open slave
market. And they've never really recovered.
Period. End of story. It's ridiculous, and it's
always been that clear.
Same thing they're doing now. He says their
ruling class eat them alive in the United
States to the point Americans openly celebrate the
murder of CEOs and murdered in the health
care industry, and they call other countries regimes.
Steve Sweeney
reporting from
Beirut based war correspondents says, I've been speaking
to people that have fled Syria, and they
are describing horrific scenes in Homs. This is
from today.
Terror groups hunting down former soldiers and members
of the Shia community just like every other
time they put these people in a position
of power. Slitting throats and even beheading people.
All happening again.
All of which is being sanitized or ignored
by western media, like, every time before this,
and others who were accused of acting for
as PR for Hyatt Tiril Sham.
Craig Murray, again, pointing out what he finds
actually, I don't think I have the video
of this. I was gonna, yeah, I was
just gonna read it to you. He simply
says, I find what is really happening at
the border. Oh, that's right. It's 7 minutes
long. At the border at Lebanon, Syria border
is entirely different than what the media narrative
is, surprise, surprise,
of a mass return of jubilant Syrians. Because
right now, what they're trying to pretend is
that now that they're back in in control,
which isn't really the reality that all these
Syrians are flooding back into Syria.
Well, he's on the border.
He's telling you it's a lie. He says
there are officially
775,000
Syrian refugees in Lebanon according to the United
Nations. The numbers are returning are negligible.
So as always, guys, they're using the plight
of a people to justify their terrorism organizations,
their terrorist acts, their occupation, their theft,
being the villain.
Another pa a poise from Iraqi Christian Foundation
saying Benjamin Netanyahu
here he is in the Golan Heights screaming
about how he's in control of Syria,
saying Benjamin Netanyahu is one of the biggest
threats to the indigenous Middle Eastern Christian communities
today, which is the truth.
He lied about WMDs to force Iraq war
resulting in 1,300,000
destroyed Christians in Iraq,
pushed for ISIS invasion of of Chaldeen and
Sirach Syriac Christian towns in Northern Iraq in
2014,
pushed for the Syria war resulting in over
2,000,000 destroyed Greek, Orthodox,
Armenian Syrian Christians,
armed arb arbaja arb,
Azerbaijan
to ethnically cleanse Armenian Christians. Guys, this is
classic.
It's consistent.
Just like we've been telling you, the war
on terror, you walk from country to point
to point. What they did was annihilate Christian
populations in Christian locations and destroy Christian communities.
Now in regard to what Israel is currently
doing, can't go continuing for what we showed
you in the last show. As Craig Murray
from the 8th pointed out, 2 astonishing things.
1, Israel has just annexed
100 more square kilometers of Syria and launched
100 of bombing attacks on Syria's military and
civilian infrastructure
without a the new regime in Syria,
firing a single shot against Israel. You just
can't misunderstand that. In the UK, liberal dem
Democrats like Owen Jones and Salafis, like
what is this?
Five pillars still refused to accept that the
coup was organized by Israel and the United
States despite overwhelming evidence, which which tells you
a lot about Owen Jones.
In this new, anti war article, US, Israel,
and Turkey launched air strikes in Syria. This
is yesterday
after cheering regime change.
Why?
No one's fighting back. There is no resistance
force.
What are you bombing?
I mean, it's a very simple point that
it should just wake everybody up to this
because the game was to destroy this. And
then Hayat al Sham is there in power.
Why aren't they angry? Why aren't they fighting
back? Because they're all on the same side.
They're bombing what they claim. I'm willing to
bet you that the what they claim they're
bombing ISIS. I they're just I think it's
all military infrastructure and just civilians.
And they're doing this to give the impression,
the one that this was is an ongoing
thing, so they're not expected to start saving
people and turning this back around what they
would pretend they would do,
reconstruction, is that they're in the middle of
a battle. They can't. Right?
As well as the fact that they wanna
justify bombing all of the infrastructure so they
can never reestablish Assyria.
John Hudson points out this is on 8th.
2 days ago,
the US bombed 75
targets in Syria. This is from Central Command.
They report it right there. 75.
For what purpose?
You weren't fighting anybody.
I can I mean, I'll hammer that? It's
just it needs to be
overly expressed.
They were deliberately bombing infrastructure at a point
when nobody was resisting. You know what that's
called? Terrorism.
It's pretty simple.
Department of Defense on 9th.
DOD's mission is to defeat ISIS
in in Syria.
Call talk about reactive. Right? We we just
bombed 75 installations of the Syrian government.
Oh, when oh, Isis. That's right. We're going
after Isis. We've we forgot about that. That's
that's why we're do we're doing that.
Bombing Isis.
Good?
This is stupid.
Oh, you mean the Isis that Trump defeated
14 times? I'm sure he'll say that again
tomorrow.
Funny how that works out.
Anthony Blinken on 8th as they bomb 75
targets as Assadrad points out. 75 targets. He
goes after 14 years, the Syrian people have
finally have a reason for hope. The United
States strongly supports a peaceful transition of power,
bombing everything.
I don't see a transition of anything. I
see your terrorist group sitting in positions of
power and you bombing whatever you want. How
is that a peaceful anything for the Syrian
people?
Mister Anthony knows
that. He's a monster.
Absolute disgusting human being.
Candace Owens, same thing. 75 targets. She goes,
LOL, Israel and America fund and arm ISIS,
which they do, and Al Qaeda, which they
do. And after they do our dirty work,
we just murder them and take the land.
That's what she was referencing in the interview
with Horton. Right? The entire world can see
this now. Now, again, I agree. But I
just don't know if I think that's always
the plan or if it's just use whatever
you can, whatever you can, and sacrifice whatever
you need, whatever you needed. Who cares what
agreements we've made?
Either way, the point is core the sake
same point. They work with the terrorist groups,
and they're willing to use
them and the in the location to justify
bombing to do the next step.
All of which sacrifices the safety of the
people they claim they're fighting for, including you,
by the way.
Ali Abunamal points out, I thought the official
script was supposed to be a Syrian popular
revolution. Right? Well, here's Joe Biden
saying that they are responsible directly thanks to
the Ukraine and Israel.
How's that work out?
The upshot for all this is for the
first time ever, either Russia nor Iran nor
Hezbollah
could defend
this abhorrent regime in Syria.
This is a direct result of blows that
Ukraine,
Israel
have delivered upon their own self defense
with unflagging support of the United States. God.
I mean, I mean, I mean, I don't
I know I don't it's it's almost it's
it's almost like the elephant in the room
that you have to point out. It's crazy
how this guy is still he's, like, wobbling
back and forth. He's you can clearly see
he's struggling reading and mumbling. Like, he's not
even enunciating. It's crazy.
And this supposed to be the guy in
power. Like, I mean, it's just didn't realize
that it's the same with Trump, by the
way. Not that he's senile, but it's just
that these people are puppets, guys. That's the
point.
Israel
have delivered upon their own self defense
with unflagging support of United States. This is
a direct result of the blows that Ukraine,
Israel
have delivered upon their own self defense.
Have blows? So he comes off saying they
it's because of Ukraine and Israel
that this is wait. That they did this.
That they came off the blows of their
self defense.
I mean,
could could you not at least try to
write that more I mean, it's just so
lazy.
So can we just protect can we just
move past this lie that they're always in
some state of perpetual self defense? I mean,
you can't make this more dumb. Like, if
if you know you're always gonna be arguing
or defending yourself, at least give us a
gap where you're not always saying that. Like,
you realize if you're in a a war,
you can't always be defending yourself. There's always
there's gonna be a time where you're fighting.
Right? It's it's
again, I don't know if it's desperation
or almost at some crazy level we're supposed
to see this. But either way, it's really
stupid that he can stand there and tell
you that these overt acts of aggression using
terrorist organizations are somehow still Israel. We we've
won
all in self defense.
It's like, this is so stupid. By definition,
that's not possible. Whatever. It's just it's ridiculous.
With unflagging support of United States.
And over the past 4 years, my administration
pursued a clear principal policy towards Syria. Clear
principal policy. We made clear from the start,
sanction on on Ra Assad
would remain in place unless he engaged seriously
in a political process.
Which he did, by the way. Of course,
the lie is that he was not engaging.
Yeah. He was though. You guys refused
to engage with him. Like, that's how dishonest
this is. You guys refused. You said he
doesn't exist. We won't allow Siri to reconstruct
until sod's out of the way. That's what
you said publicly. Now it's that he refused
to engage, and that's why we sanctioned until
he did. Like, they're just rewriting the history
because they need to make it look like
they weren't punitively sanctioning all of Syria for
a decade because they just didn't want that
guy. As simple as that. And by the
way, always funding terrorists, and now we watch
that group become the power structure.
End the civil war
as outlined by the UN Security Council resolution,
passed in 2015.
Oh, so the the the resolution outlined by
Hamas apparently, according to Israel. So but we
want that Hamas resolution because we like it.
But Assad refused.
So we carried out a comprehensive sanction program
against him and all those responsible for atrocities
against the Syrian people.
2nd,
we maintained our military presence in Syria.
Our counter ISIS
to counter the support of local partners as
well on the ground. Oh, is that what
it was? You know, Trump openly admitted he
was there to take the oil.
I guess we'll just ignore that. They're partners.
Never see an inch of territory,
taking out leaders of ISIS,
ensuring that ISIS can never establish a safe
haven there again.
3rd,
we've supported Israel's freedom of action against Iranian
networks in Syria.
Okay. You that doesn't matter. It's still a
crime. Just because you support
an illegal action does not therefore make it
okay.
You can't just bomb who you want wherever
you want because you don't like them being
there. By that logic, Iran could bomb anything
in Israel or anything in the United States
at any time. And you would call it
terrorism. So what's the difference? Because they're Iran
and you're the United States. That's it. Simple.
It's always good when you do it. It's
always bad when they do it. Anybody confused?
And he has actors aligned with Iran,
transported
lethally to Lebanon.
Which is not a crime because they're allies.
Same same
point. And when necessary, order the use of
military force against Iranian networks
to protect US forces.
Our approach is I mean, does anybody wanna
point out in any case where Iran has
attacked US forces outside of you illegally invading
Syria, which Iranian forces were defending that illegal
occupation, which is where Soleimani responded? Or the
idea that
in any context, put some of that point
forward where you claim that they attacked, Anytime
we can see Iran engaging at this point
is because they're responding to these attack, and
they're usually bombing
a place in Iraq where the US is
illegally occupying.
Rarely, we saw the rare example in Tel
Aviv where they show they told them they
were gonna bomb.
But
every 30 seconds, you can see the US
bombing a foreign country,
occupying, stealing, killing.
Israel's raping and torturing, but we're gonna talk
about them being the aggressive actor.
To the balance of power in the Middle
East.
Through this combination of support for our partners,
sanctions,
diplomacy,
and targeted military force when necessary,
we now see new opportunities open up for
the people of Syria and for the entire
region. Gross. Looking ahead, the United States will
do the following.
1st,
we'll support Syria's neighbors, including Jordan,
Lebanon, Iraq, and Israel should any threat arise
from Syria. Okay. All of which you're occupying
by the way. Literally, you're occupying
this, you know, it's just it's just I
don't even it's not even worth wasting your
time on this absolute mumbling fool.
He he just he's just he's struggling to
read off whoever wrote that on the teleprompter.
The truth is that they're openly working with
terrorist organizations to destabilize all of those locations
other than Israel. And even that is actually
happening too by default because of what they're
doing.
And this is another clip I'll just skip
because we're gonna wrap up here, but Joe
Biden has announced,
this is the 8th, that the US government's
directly involving in Syria backing the rebellion, which
includes groups like ISIS and Al Qaeda
to the point
we will help ensure stability in Eastern Syria,
protecting our ally and personnel against any threats.
So think about how dumb it is to
stand here and tell us that you're bombing
for Al Qaeda, but you're continuing to fight
in Syria to make sure we hold off
Al Qaeda.
That's that's the that's the point of those
2 videos.
They're bombing right now to support this group,
and they're also bombing and claiming they're fighting
them.
They've lost the plot.
Lindsey Graham, of course,
Patrick Henning says,
basically, neo cons need ISIS.
The point is that just like Zionism needs
to pretend they're saving Judaism, it's the same
kind of idea. He says, with the recent
collapse of Assad regime in Syria, the game
changes dramatically. It's because a big loss for
Russia and Iran, which is good. He said,
however, the Jihadist
forces that they're supporting
have replaced Assad, create major problems for Israel,
Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq. Guys, you're the
ones telling us in in other I mean,
in other tweets
that they're better than Assad or that they
are somebody we should support even. I mean,
Israel is on the ground
working alongside them. The US is bombing for
their support as Biden just said. And here's
Lindsey Graham telling us that they're a threat
to Israel even though they just stood up
and said Israel's our friend.
Oh, wait. Never mind. Now we don't like
them. Bad guy. The next day,
he says, as US interest to Syria, there's
over 50,000 ISIS prisoners primarily being held in
Kurdish forces,
basically saying that they might let them out.
Get get, you know, wink wink.
Get where this is going.
They're gonna use this to pretend this whole
thing like, they're they're recreating the war on
terror, which lasted 20 years.
Meanwhile, they're taking whatever they want from whichever
place they want.
He also says, I appreciate the air strikes
against ISIS targets in Syria. That's how that
that's how they're playing this. We're fighting ISIS
over here,
but it will not be enough. Realize, whether
we're talking about Al Qaeda or ISIS, they're
both on the same side. They're both on
the side of Israel and the United States.
We have to ensure that they're roughly 50,000
same point not being released. He says we
should not allow the Kurdish forces to be
threatened by Turkey or the radical Islamists who
have taken over Syria.
The groups that we were just told are
supposed to be there, that you're that Israel's
supporting, that Trump said or it was not
our fight. I mean, how do you make
sense of any of this? They there have
so many overlapping lies that don't connect that
it's just becoming clumsy.
Brian Grim is pointing that out.
Saying we draw a line at ISIS is
such a funny American policy.
It's simply saying, we clear we we clear
we're clear eyed about the fact that ISIS
will try to take advantage of a vacuum
to reestablish its capability to create safe haven,
mister Biden said. We will not let that
happen.
As as they were saying before, they need
that. They need the illusion that what they're
doing is holding it be, the evil villain.
It's exactly what Israel tried to do with
Hamas.
It's saying a swarm of, of their planes
and war planes hit more than 75 targets.
We just told you that. It says, quote,
there should be no doubt that we will
not allow ISIS to reconstitute and take advantage,
saying all organizations in Syria should know that
we will hold them accountable if they partner
with ISIS. Well, the group currently in power
is already partnered with ISIS.
Stupid. The situation for the United States is
all the more complicated by its own transition
in Washington. Mister Biden has just 6 weeks
left.
So he's simply saying, pointing out that, like,
that that's so ISIS is the bad guy,
but we're good with the with Al Qaeda
and power because it suits our interest. And
then this person says accept it, leaves out
the rest of it, which already and this
is how dumb this gets.
So right now, they're trying to stress the
idea that past 2,017,
well, we know he's reformed. Right? He changed.
Same thing they did with the Azov movement,
where you can you can see their reports
from, like, the month before it happened where
they're going, definite Nazis who are, right to
this very day, are sigheiling and supporting.
And then the next day, well, 4 years
ago, they were formed, and they're no longer
Nazis, and that's the narrative they go with.
Right? Well, this is from I think this
is, Wikipedia.
But at the same point, you're gonna find
everywhere. It says, Al Jalani announced the dissolution
of of,
Jabhat al Fat al Shahl al Sham and
its merger into
a larger organization, Hayat al Sham.
Then it says, the US government quickly rejected
this rebranding, with the US embassy in Syria
stating that the core of Hayat al Sham
is Nusra, a designated terrorist organization. This designation
applies regardless of what name it uses or
what group it merges with. The embassy characterized
Hyatt Sheryl Shom formation as an attempt to,
quote, hijack the Syria revolution
rather than a move toward more
toward
moderation.
But wait. Never mind. Now we like that
narrative, so change. Now today, they've said since
2017, we've all said that they've reformed.
That's how dumb this is.
They don't care that you can see it,
apparently.
And I played this earlier, but here's Assad
telling you that Trump is controlled by the
deep state.
It says, whatever you may think of Assad,
David Icke writes, he had Trump's sussed in
2017,
and the same will play out again. It
already is, and he's not even in office
yet.
The problem in the United States is about
the whole political system. It's not about 1
person.
Trump's,
election has proven again for us, again and
again, that the president is only a performer.
He's not the decision maker.
He's part of different lobbies and the deep
states or the deep regime as you can
call it, who implement
and dictate
to all the president what should he be,
doing. And the proof to what I'm what
I'm saying that, Trump, after he became president,
he swallowed most of the promises and the
word that he was
boosting
during his campaign. He made 180,
turn in nearly every
promise. So why?
Because the deep state wouldn't allow him to
go in in certain direction.
That's why for me,
dealing with him as a person, it could
be, but can that person deliver? No. And
the United States president cannot deliver.
The whole state, the deep state only,
is the one who can deliver. And this
is the problem, this deep state doesn't accept
partners around the world.
They don't they only accept puppets. They only
accept followers. They only accept,
proxies. That's what they Uh-huh. We're not we're
not any of these.
Exactly.
You starting to get a sense on why
he's removed from power?
As Sarah Abdallah points out coming into today
and forward or you're technically laced last night,
but this this first one. Israel's massively bombing
Latakia in Syria right now, a city that
has stood for over 4000 years.
Remember, nobody's putting nobody's fighting back, guys. Nobody's
resisting. Israel is literally annihilating Syria and the
west is celebrating as liberation. That's how disgusting
this is.
This is tonight or other oops. That's hold
on. Is that the same?
I thought that was the 10th.
Yeah. Oh, I thought was the middle of
the day. That's strange. I thought that this
next day. Well, the rest of them are
from today, but this one is again last
night saying, Damascus in yesterday night
launched over 250
air raids on Syria just in the past
48 hours
and count and continues advancing on Syrian soil.
About a peep from the so called international
community.
I guess outrage is strictly reserved for Ukraine.
Menschel Sint points out Israel and, guys, this
is very easy to show right now. Israel
is destroying Syrian air bases,
military and defense systems, intelligence, military, and government
structures.
While they're we're fighting ISIS, and they're just
systematically taking out anything that both the military
or the civilian population might need.
Gaza 2 point o. Basically, they're demilitarizing
Syria.
There's videos. It's very easy to see, guys.
It's all over the place.
Here's Suppressed News pointing out the same thing.
More than 250 Israeli strikes on Syria in
the past 48 hours,
targeting
air force, the navy. I mean, everything that's
important to the country.
Syrian girl says the next thing these, quote,
revolutionaries will tell you is that, quote, freeing
Syria was worth letting Israel destroy Syria and
stealing your land. They've been saying that from
the start. Traitors.
Israel's radar account points the IDF announces 70
to 80%
of Assad's regime military capabilities destroyed.
See how that works? So Israeli media is
over here going, look at what we did.
Well, your government's going, we're fighting ISIS.
It's that effing easy to see.
They just know the the Israel loves to
take credit for what they're doing that makes
the US look stupid. So their audience looks
over there and looks at dumb Biden lying
while we know what we're doing. It's demonstrating
control over US policy.
They love it.
You just you just took out civilian well,
brought took out they bombed civilians all over
the place. That was explicitly clear from the
8th forward. But here, they're telling you we
took out these military capabilities,
which by the way kills innocent people with
every time they do this while nobody's resisting
in order to destroy what they could use
in anything going forward. So this is not
some transition of power. This is the destruction
of everything Syrian, like everything else we've talked
about. It says, so the IDF had its
entire Syrian army mapped out, and it's now
knocking out all its major assets based on
precise intel.
That's just publicly telling you this.
Brian Yekalek points out that the Israeli Navy
has now carried out large scale operations to
destroy
former Assad's navy fleet.
For what? Same point. No one's fighting back.
It is it is really unnerving to see
how much this this can happen on full
display.
What needs to show you is how many
people are circling around this complete broken system
and are just feeding off it like a
bunch of parasites and are unwilling to show
you the truth. And they see it. Trust
me. It's very obvious. It says, no Assad's
fleet. This is this is a fleet that
belongs to the country of Syria,
and they're destroying it anyway.
Patrick Henningsen points out, and he called this,
by the way, back on 4th, that they
were floating the idea of white helmets were
coming back, get ready for a chemical weapons
attack. And, really, all that happened was when
moron Elon Levy came out and pointed to
what the u the the Israeli news was
saying, they had they on the, the 6th,
IDF attacks a chemical weapons plan. Right? They
just had to throw it out there so
it's like some kind of a narrative for
them to bite at. We were finding the
evil chemical weapons Assad regime.
And the point was, he predicted it, and
they followed through. But here's the crazy part.
This just like the October 7th forward kind
of clumsy, just things got floated, like, weeks
apart as if they were the same thing.
Same thing here.
You'll see it's the same report. But back
then, they were going, look, we got the
chemical weapons. So here's a new one on
9th.
And you could read it. They said they
said this said Monday. That was the same
day that they had struck chemical weapons depots.
There's no evidence of any of this.
They're just saying look. Whether they did or
not, the point is they're destroying everything else.
So this is about trying to create the
narrative they're fighting evil things while they're literally
the embodiment of evil, destroying everything Syrian.
Now Craig Murray also points out Israel has
taken land in Syria up to twice the
size of the Gaza Strip, and Israeli tanks
are now 30 miles away from Damascus and
possibly closer. This is a full on occupation.
Yet, Hayat Chir El Sham,
the group we're telling that we're being told
is in control and apparently not in line
with Israel. Right? Because they're Islamists, and they're
enemies. Right?
Okay. Then why have they not fired a
single shot, he says. Not one shot as
an Israeli soldier.
If that doesn't make you understand what's happening,
nothing will.
And that's the point here. Even Keith Woods
shows you what the Wikipedia page is saying.
In Israel's invasion of Syria. There's a page
for it. Opponents?
None.
It's right. It's very clear.
Commanders, leaders, one side, Benjamin Netanyahu, the other
one? None.
Units involved? None. Strength? None. No one is
fighting back, even according to their documented page.
Okay? And so my point was the same.
So honest people
will immediately be asking who, why they are
bombing then.
Right?
Where's my honest people at? It's just gotta
be the most obvious question in the I
I mean, it shouldn't be that crazy. It's
that they're destroying this. But the question you
can ask is why? But just acknowledge they
are destroying
civilian and military infrastructure when nobody's fighting back,
so that makes it terrorism. All of these
are crimes. Every part of it.
Marwan Ozwin points out, Israel has seized 240
square kilometers of Syrian land over the past
24 hours. This is between 8th 9th, but
the land is not enough.
They've claimed our skies too. Our skies, which
no longer belong to us. Decades of relentless
Israeli aggression, and the world remains silent.
And is now watching as Syrian bleeds.
Our sovereignty is trampled. Our sky is violated,
and yet no one speaks, no one moves.
How many more violations will it take?
How many more lives must be sacrificed before
the world sees what the natives of this
region have endured?
It breaks my heart.
Muhammad Shehada points out a military map in
case you wanna see it.
This is from yesterday,
much worse today. Israel is pummeling Syria and
a blatantly unprovoked assault. Now realize, guys, on
a soul,
no one's fighting back.
I should I mean, I it's almost like
even when I talk about the people, it's
like the it gets lost in the conversation.
You read this and you go, oh, they're
in the middle of a fight. No. There's
nobody they're they're bombing whatever's in front of
them for no reason.
Craig Murray was saying this the day this
started. They're just bombing civilian areas to make
it look like they're engaging.
And here, they're in some unprovoked assault. Not
a single western government would ever say Syria
has a right to defend itself. Well, also,
because it seems that nobody is.
The talking point is solely reserved for Israel
and has always meant Israel has a right
to do whatever it wants with full impunity.
Because the truth is if they were fighting
back, they would call them terrorists.
Syrian girl points out an important aspect of
this. We've mentioned this in the past, the
the Yenin plan. Israel's Balkanization
plan for Syria.
Look it up on our Gennen plan or
clean break paper. Notice the blue region
and how close it is to Syria's invasion
of or Israel's invasion of Syria and the
buffer zone plans.
Now notice where they're bombing. K? Look. This
is the plan.
Interesting. Kurdish where the US already has a
lot of that area.
Well, look at with the blue areas where
they were supposed to be their their Golan
Heights buffer zone area. Well, look at what's
going on.
See how simple it is to see this
stuff if you just care to look.
And your reports yesterday, the US government openly
backs Israel's land grab in Syria.
Right? They're literally pretending this is some kind
of a buffer zone to keep them safe.
Well, how about if you want a buffer
zone? Make it in your own country. The
idea that you need to illegally steal land
to make a buffer zone because they're a
bad guy is so blatantly dishonest and illegal,
but that's what everything else they do. Right?
But I'll read what somebody else wrote to
make it even more clear.
He says to clarify,
Israel's claim is nonsense. Here here's what the
Associated Press is saying. Netanyahu
says Israeli forces have seized a buffer zone,
otherwise known as a legal occupation. By the
way, the Golan Heights, that's what he's gonna
say in a second, is an illegal occupation.
So you already have an illegal occupation.
He says,
Israel's justification for illegally occupying Syrians Syrian's Golan
Heights since 1967,
and this is right now on the record,
is that it acts as a, quote, buffer
zone from a strategic high ground.
Okay? So now they're stealing land beyond that
under the under the guise of a buffer
zone. So he says, you don't need a
buffer zone to defend a buffer zone. They're
illegally occupied for 57 years.
It pains me how lazy they are with
this because they know that the power structures
don't care.
They're on their side or are completely overtaken
by them, whichever one it is. So they
can just lazily do this. And almost because
I I mean, I almost could begin to
wonder if they think it's fun to watch
as we see them and they get away
with it.
Either way,
you're occupying land. You're just using the same
excuse, and we can look it up, what
you said. They don't care.
Saul Stanford points out what the UK is
saying.
McFadden on Israel bombing Syria. Quote, it's making
sure it's positioned in the Golan is secure.
So, guys, it's internationally
recognized that the Golan Heights is illegal is
illegally occupied Syrian territory.
So this guy knows that and is saying
they're gonna take more to make sure that
illegally taken land is safe.
That's what he's saying. He goes, that's the
support about the UK, she asked? And he
says, we will always support Israel's right to
defend itself.
Oh my god. So you could just keep
taking land forever and say, that's how we're
gonna secure ourselves. Now that we've taken that
land, now we're not secure at the border
because we're we've taken land. So we're gonna
take more land. That'll be buffer zone. 10
days later, now we need another buffer zone.
You could buffer zone your taking over the
world, apparently.
I mean, look at this guy. I mean,
these people
it just makes you wonder
how in the world anybody allows these kind
of cretins to be in power.
Israeli,
lord lord Bebo is saying Israeli defense minister
Israel Katz has now ordered the army to
take full control of what was what we're
just pointing to, another buffer zone.
His statement in the ministry said, he ordered
the establishment of a security zone,
you know, on top of the security zone
that's already there.
Immediately prevent the suppressed, the resumption of the
armed smuggling.
You mean, with the groups that you just
put in power, the groups that were just
high fiving you on the border, the groups
that you were giving medical treatment to in
the Golan Heights?
Just lazy.
Katz also said the destruction of the strategic
weapons in Syria will continue, including stockpiles of
air missiles. Why?
Why would you just take them for your
own?
See my point? Like, why are they just
annihilating all this? Because I'll argue I I
don't think they even have the ability to
fully take Syria right now and just occupy
it. So they're just gonna annihilate everything, so
there's no chance somebody could fill that role.
That's what it seems like to me.
So captain instructed the military to establish contacts
with the Druze community. That community
just recently kicked Netanyahu out of the community
because they said he's not welcome there. Because
he was trying to pretend like he's there
to support his people. They don't want you
there. They're not Israel. That's Syrian territory, and
they know that.
That he's just simply saying that they basically
had everyone focusing on that prison in Syria,
and while they were doing that, they were
destroying everything Syrian.
And it works. All of these mindless corporate
stooges followed right along with what they were
pointing to.
And in South Syria, Eunice Tarawi,
showing you that not only are they doing
everything we just showed you, but now they're
literally rolling in and just they're taking over
Syria.
Now, again, whether they can officially occupy it,
like, from a military government standpoint, is up
is I don't think they can. But they're
still do they're rolling in and doing whatever
they want. Scenes obtained showing Israeli soldiers from
the Negev Brigade special operations unit invading a
village
in Quinterra and Southern Syria,
but unusually not armored vehicles.
So for all we know, they're just tearing
in there and just rape and pillage.
They're getting away with it.
Here's sir, Israeli media.
They said, quote, Syria is laid out in
front of us. I'm calling on those who
call the shots.
Occupied as much territory as possible.
Not temporary. This sure be ours.
See the point, guys? Because this is what
they've radicalized their population into. They want the
greater Israel project, and they are not quiet
about it. So now when they start doing
it, their population is screech shopping at the
bit for the thing that they're pretending isn't
happening.
Just like with Lebanon, just like with Gaza,
it's always that clear. These people are maniacs.
And then as Patrick points out, the Assad
must go fanatics
just now discovering they got played by Israel.
Now I don't know if that's the case
or not. I know some of the people
out there
I I find it more likely that they're
on a certain side. But either way,
this person writes, there's no excuse for Israel
to target newly liberated territories now. See, this
person clearly is just lying to themselves. This
is considered an act of aggression. Yeah.
Well, that's what as Patrick's saying, that's what
you get for welcoming in a foreign army
taking over your country because you bought propaganda
from the United States. He says there are
no longer Assad forces or Iranian forces. They
have liberated our country and is liberated. And
Israeli,
air strikes on weapons depots are now aggression
because these weapons belong to the Syrian state.
Yeah. You're right. They don't care though. See
how that works?
In the new Syria, he says, we are
not a hostile country, and therefore, Israel must
top these strikes. Yeah. Good good luck with
that.
It's it's I it's just shocking to me
that anybody can be that lost in this
conversation. It's obvious what's going on.
The cradle points out
the Hayat al Sham group, guess what? They
just pulled up to the shores of Lebanon.
Al Jadid reports that Hayat al Sham militants
have arrived at the aridah border crossing between
Lebanon and Syria.
Here we go.
I mean, guys, get ready. If you think
this is gonna stop short, these people like,
whether it's because Israel wants it or not,
they just let the gates out on this
horrifying terrorist organization who are raping and pillaging
and stealing and beating and executing people in
the square.
And they're all and then the media is
over here going, revolution. Freedom.
Like, it's it's just like the people that
took over in Azov in Ukraine. They were
horrifying,
and they said freedom.
Right? In Syria, they shot protesters and blamed
it on the island. They said freedom.
Venezuela.
Right? They were burnt throwing Molotov cocktails and
going, and they did it. Freedom. Like, it's
just so constant.
They're always supporting the worst person around and
pretending they're the best in the room.
Now, I'm gonna leave these for later, actually,
just I'm ready to wrap up. The bottom
line, guys,
is it's very, very clear
what this is. It it's it's like everything
else we've been talking about in the last
6 months or a year. It's just it's
become very obvious.
The information's all right there. It's easy to
look up if you care to look for
yourself.
The important point to take away from this
is
the elements we're discussing. Not just, hi, Terrell
Schom, but the origin points.
ISIS, Al Qaeda, these are US Israeli entities.
The it's not again, this is not some
debatable opinion. The evidence is very clear. That's
where Trump gets that founder point, but it
relates to through his administration, by the way,
but it goes back well before Obama. The
reality is clear that they have been radicalizing
elements for a very long time
and using them and then acting like they're
fighting them in order to suppress populations that
don't wanna bow to their interests.
That makes them the villain of the conversation.
The one using the worst person in order
to coerce other people into giving up things
they want for their benefit.
See, my point is always is you you
can have the the terrorists that are moving
around. Right? These are just people that are
we're we're murderers. We kill because we wanna
take things. That's a horrible person. But I
argue it's far, far worse to be the
person who is screaming I'm the good guy
while using them to secretly kill you, secretly
rape and pillage, and then take the benefits
for themselves while still professing to be the
one doing good to the world.
That's worse in my opinion. That means you
are just as bad as a terrorist, but
you are are so deranged and psychopathic that
you're willing to stand up and try to
take credit for doing good while knowing that
you're hurting everyone.
There's something especially evil about that and we
need to start calling this what it is.
Because because we can't change this, guys, just
like everything else we're seeing. It's so obvious
what this is. We just need people to
stand up and fight back. And I'm
not wrong choice of word in the context
of this because I'm never advocating for violence.
But pushback
against these narratives,
especially the partisan dynamic. That's where the that's
the first thing that used to fall.
Whether you wanna vote or not or vote
for one of these people, recognize the partisan
game of it all is why this never
changes, At least in the context of the
United States, we could tip this over the
edge if we just stop falling into that
game.
If we stop supporting Israel, it's what they're
doing. I mean, so many things could easily
change with small action if we just push
it further.
So push it further.
Really, thank you for tuning in today, guys,
and continuing to stand up for this stuff
because it's tough.
It really is. It's tough not just to
it's tough to see this going on but
it's even imagine living through this. Imagine if
this was your neighborhood, Right? If these were
your children, if you watched your historic
community get destroyed, and then people are saying
you're a bad guy. You know? And and
this if I could be talking about any
one of these locations,
it's worse when you can see these people
out there trying to use their plight to
benefit themselves. And that's what the political conversation
is. So help just at the very least,
get awareness around this topic and highlight these
focal points. Make these clips by the way
as I keep saying and I will share
them if you wanna tag me. I think
some of these parts need to get out
further. But thank you for tuning in.
As always, I love you all. Question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Even or not, weird as it sounds, the
US has been fighting
Israel's wars for decades. It's been a disaster
for the United States, 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars. By
the way, the Israel lobby puts in, you
know, a $100,000,000,000
and it gets out 1,000,000,000,000 on the other
side of
absolutely
horrendous,
useless, reckless wars fought on Israel's behalf. Well,
Netanyahu would as I said, he doesn't view
it as a failure because the US keeps
complying. It keeps going along with this. It
it hasn't stood up and said, you ruined
us in 2003.
You promised we'd take out Saddam Hussein, and
all would be well. You told us to
take out Bashar al Assad. We tried to
do that, and that was in 2011, and
we're 13 years later, and we're still at
war. You told us to take out Muammar
Gaddafi, and we did that 13 years ago,
and now there's still chaos.
You have done such destruction, mister Netanyahu. Stop
it. We don't say that. No. So he
just keeps doing this. And maybe and I
I'm sure that he thinks, with with Donald
Trump, now I can really do it. Now
we'll go to war with Iran.
The other side of this was the idea
that, yes, we'll do that for Syria, Libya,
Iraq,
Iran,
but the Saudis will come with us for
free. You know, we'll give them some,
some, weapon systems, maybe a defense pact, and
they'll sign on. That was also the idea
of Trump and Biden. No difference between the
2, in approach.
But that's over if it was ever realistic.
It's completely over. That's what the crown prince's
statement
today, but he's been making it repeatedly
in recent months. It's over.
Now
I don't know whether the Trump people
understand this or not. Who knows? But they're
gonna find out, and Netanyahu is gonna find
out. And all of this is an extraordinarily
reckless behavior, and Netanyahu has been one of
the most destructive forces in world politics for
a long time now, and he's done a
lot of damage to the United States. Thank
you. And it's time for him to shut
up, basically, to stop trying to bring the
United States into war,
and his latest is to bring it into
war with Iran.