Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Sunday, December 8, 2024.
Thank you for joining me. A very important
follow-up today as a lot has taken place
since yesterday into the day regarding Syria. So
that's gonna be the primary focus of today's
show. I have just a few points I'm
gonna start with, and we're gonna go into
I mean, really, my my obvious point on
days like this when even as we're getting
more information than yesterday, far more difficult to
kind of you know, the fog of war
as they call it.
Today, with all of the different buying interests
on top of a very much still developing
story, my goal in days like this is
to essentially try to
just help help
help it make sense to you. Right? As
much as we can, break down not just
the the moment to moment
developments,
who did what and how it's going and
where they fled to and but also why
these things are happening. Right? Where does the
funding come from? How who supported them in
the past? What connections do they have in
other countries? Like, make sure the picture develops
that it's not just a here's what narrative
you're supposed to know today, which is corporate
media,
mainstream alternative media, people with agendas.
So today, the main focal point is to
break down the Syria conversation
in regard to what just happened, the Israeli
overlap, the United States' interest,
what's going on with Assad, Russia's involvement, and
really kind of make it make sense. I
real and to be quite honest, it's not
I mean, this this is a more complicated
dynamic than than Gaza, by and large.
The the old the classic idea of such
a complicated situation, that's the narrative that gets
thrown over it in order to make it,
you know, so people avoid it. Now Syria
is admittedly much more complicated, not to say
that either are simple,
but it is actually easy to see when
you really break down the the the basics
of this. There are there are parts of
the story that I argue are,
you know, using the facts at hand, you
can make come to your own assessment about
what might be happening in certain parts of
this.
And that's maybe the way some of these
always end up. Historically, we have a lot
of large events that we I still argue
we don't fully know all the events. But
my point in this is to highlight a
couple of main points
that Israel and the United States,
without question, are supporting and always have been
supporting the proxy elements they're using to overthrow
Assad or have overthrown Assad as it appears.
And I wanna make sure we understand why
that might be happening and not just in
the dynamic of the larger ongoing war that
Israel and the US are conducting,
multiple points of genocide within it,
but also the larger greater Israel project, which
also, by the way, whether it's because they
align an interest or because that that is
a part something larger, which I think it's
more of the former.
It's also part of the larger globalist great
reset dynamic.
And what's interesting to me is how much
of this contradicts in just like a way
with what a lot of the Republican conversation
is right now. I mean, even just look
at the conversation of, you know, working with
Israel to fight the the evil Islamist mindset,
and that now we're going, but these Islamist
mindset are good because we don't like Assad.
Oh, so geopolitical interests are more important than
the the the the basis for the entire
war on terror? I mean, the point is,
as usual in the last so many months,
even the last year or more, they seem
to be destroying
foundational narratives to make a small momentary benefit.
That to me shows desperation, but you guys
can decide for yourselves. Now based off yesterday,
what what what where I was at with
yesterday, when and I'll give you my basis
general opinion of yesterday as well, which is
I think that there was shifting dynamics happening
here. And I'll get into a lot of
different opinions to start about whether there were
some deals that were made either to begin
with or after there was a first move
and, ultimately, that or, essentially, whether there might
have been
a a a strategic play
that carries on to this day that might
be not just about Syria,
but about the larger Middle East dynamic,
which I actually really get right now that
that we can all sense this is not
about one location. There's a much bigger game
being played, and whether the question being whether
Syria and Russia made a tactical decision
to fight for something larger than just Syria,
maybe even with the interest of ultimately taking
it back. And maybe all of those things
simultaneously.
And we're gonna go over some of these
opinions about what deals might have been made.
So yesterday, what Vanessa or even back to,
like, the first and and before, what Vanessa
was highlighting is that there were elements that
were still there, as we discussed, in places
like Altam, the Ruben camp, a US Israeli
location that they've never let go
and that they've been fostering extremists, terrorists, Al
Qaeda, ISIS elements. This is you know, anybody
out there right now who is still pushing
back on claims like that, they don't it's
it's like pretending that Zionism is not exactly
what it was or that Israel is exactly
what they claim. These people don't want to
see the foundational obvious truth that you can
prove 45 times over because they're invested in
a narrative. Just to make that clear. The
US government and Israel fund and work with
these exact elements that they've always been claimed
to be fighting. The evidence has always been
there. So the point
is that they had some of these sleeper
elements that they used, and, ultimately, what Vanessa
was arguing is that they responded in a
way that tried to minimize the damage
and
ultimately maximize,
and for a long term point,
their resources, their personnel
that ultimately would have been lost in something
that they wouldn't have necessarily needed to gain.
Because the point was the people that she
originally said were there were not enough to
actually take a lot of territory, which obviously
we're seeing something different
now. So the argument, which very well could
have been incorrect to begin with, was that
they ultimately made that tactical decision. Now between
that point and then when I reported on
yesterday and the day before,
things obviously shifted. More more more personnel, clearly
present. More
retreat, as it were, but I'm I see
it more so as a as a tactical
decision. Because I just don't see how they
would have made these choices up until now
and then just ultimately all of them sort
of pulling back, and maybe there was a
deal that was made within that and maybe
a a,
what's the word? A not sabotage. Well, sabotage
works, but a not honoring that deal within
part of that as well from people that
were within it. But my point is that
ultimately we got to the point to where
now we are seeing
as as is being reported anyway, Assad fleeing
to Russia. Originally, it was the idea that
he was killed and we'll go over that
as well. But even
right now, again, either of those could still
be the case or false. It's very difficult
to know who's telling the truth. We have
to use our discernment. And if we can't
prove it, we have to fall back on
what we don't know or fall back on
that we don't know and not try to
just pick a narrative. That's what's always difficult
about these. But so then we saw them
start to take locations,
continuing to take more territory.
And so that's where we get into whether
or not these were still
strategic moves, whether there were deals being made,
or whether there were ultimate decisions that were
to just give up on it for now
or maybe entirely. But so past this point,
we now know and, oh, I should say,
by the way, out of the gate. Vanessa,
who was in Syria, is safe. She has
gotten out as of so many hours ago
that she posted that on Twitter. That is
confirmed. So it's good to know that she's
out of there. That's the dangerous place to
be with what's going on for people, for
for Syrians, for anybody who cares about the
truth. But
we're at today. We're gonna get into
the developments going on since then and whether
or not we're seeing the evidence that backs
up any number of these claims. And, again,
as I said, we'll go over a lot
of different points on what people think are
happening and what we'll think will come from
this. I'm still of the mind that I
I was gonna say before is that they
started with something that was smaller. And, ultimately,
whether the plan was to turn this into
something larger or because of the quick pullback
of the forces, that's kinda what makes sense
to me is that Vanessa had the right
of it because she was there and she
could see these things, and that it wasn't
as large as it was being reported. It
was more of a psychological operation point.
And then because of the way that they
responded, I get the sense that maybe they
chose to take advantage of that. And I
think almost in a very clumsy way, which
we'll get into,
where this could have even been a trap
using Syria. There's a lot of different theories
floating around. Ultimately, it seems that this is
going to be a detriment
to the agenda that Israel and the US
think they're carrying out. I mean, we have
to realize that with the what's going on
with the genocide, with the foreign policy dynamic
in Gaza and Lebanon,
as much as it seems that they're
you know, let's be clear about this. They're
not winning in that dynamic.
K? They they are going forward, and we've
now established that the corporate media, the western
press, the western journalists
don't care and are happy to lie to
you, to your face forever despite how it's
I mean, I don't know how much more
proven that story can get. I've never seen
something so completely proven to a tee, documented,
covered, highlighted, videotaped.
So the point is,
it's not stopping.
So you could argue they're winning seeing seeing
as nobody's stopping them, but I wouldn't frame
it that way. They're losing. They have lost
their reputation. They have lost troops. They they
haven't succeeded in any of the goals they've
laid out except absolute destruction of Gaza. And
so my point is in this regard,
just because they've taken the territory are you
could argue doesn't necessarily translate to a win
in regard to how that may be used.
That they maybe expected Russia and the United
States to or rather Russia and Iran rather
to
further invest in Syria and maybe mire themselves
in it to distract from what they want
from Lebanon, but that did not what happened.
So now the US and Israel are
falling headlong into Syria, maybe by design,
and now have to explain what's going on,
why they're there, what they're going to be
doing, and now they seem to be overextended.
It's an interesting back and forth. So all
of that's to say that you can decide
what makes more sense, and I get the
sense that in the next so many days,
maybe weeks, we will find out more. We'll
get more information,
more inform from people like Putin or people
like, even Assad, seeing as how he's still
around, or the US and Israel, and it'll
develop more. Be skeptical.
Bet your sources. Right? This is an important
time right now to make sure we're being
accurate. So let's jump into this with a
couple of opening points before we start with
Syria. That's gonna be the entire show today.
A major focus on the make the what
I did last time, but far more fleshed
out to understand without question that Israel and
the United States are funding, at the very
least, Hayat Tir al Sham. The group that
they're currently pretending is some rebel organization, which
is exactly the game they played last time.
It's a group that they have been telling
you are a major terrorist organization, and over
the process of so many years, they've just
reformed themselves. We suddenly start saying words like
pluralism and multilateral
multilateralism. Oh my god. We're a good organization
now.
So the crimes they committed and beheading children,
that's just no big deal as long as
they yell the right words and say they're
in line with Israel. Yes. That's the the
moral moral of the story. We'll go through
the proof of how far back you wanna
look that Israel has always been doing this.
The US has always been doing this to
make sure that's clear.
But to start,
I wanna point out a couple of side
points as I shouldn't call them side points,
but from context of the show focus today,
as Eva Bartlett points out, the situation in
Northern Gaza is beyond catastrophic. So as this
all turns to be the focus, let's make
sure we recognize that Israel always
I mean, I've never seen them not use
a moment like this to go after everybody
else. So I can tell you right now,
and I'm I'm willing to bet anything that
you'll see tomorrow, that the amount of bombings
they did on civilians in both Lebanon and
Gaza went rapidly high while people were looking
over here in Syria. The north the situation
in Northern Gaza, she's recording this as yesterday,
is beyond catastrophic.
Israeli occupation forces have destroyed about 90% of
the buildings in all of in Northern Gaza,
leaving displaced families to seek shelter in schools,
the schools they later bombed, by the way.
But over the past few months, these schools
have also been targeted and destroyed. Now thousands
of people are sleeping on the streets without
any shelter, with with women and children forced
to sleep on the ground.
Out in the dirt, on the ground, during
winter.
The end goal is to make northern Gaza
in uninhabitable in order to ethnically cleanse the
remaining population to build settlements. Now this is
my point, guys. We all see this happening.
I don't care what your narrative was to
begin with. I don't even care if you
were right, which we can prove you weren't,
about Hamas and human shields, and that's why
they're all still there. They're all bad guys.
The point is that you can now prove
that we're talking about civilians
sleeping on the street. They're still there.
100 of thousands of civilians that are still
in Gaza. Okay? So the point is, now
what's the explanation?
Why are these people sleeping in the dirt
on the ground? What's going on?
You just can't hide the reality. You can't
decouple what you can see they're doing to
these people
from
or rather, you can't pretend that it's not
what it looks like
when they're I I think can't can't frame
that right. The point is that their narrative
that they're putting forward is that this is
fighting bad guys. But what you can see,
which I shouldn't have to shout I mean,
you guys all know, shows you the exact
opposite. And what she's highlighting for you is
the ongoing reality that we're not even looking
to. It's just becoming normal because it is
just this is what I was saying earlier
is that it just keeps going.
So we can all highlight as we all
have UN reports, Amnesty International, human rights groups
going, they're murdering everybody.
And we all just wait with bated breath,
and it just keeps going. The US says,
no. They're not. The US Israel calls you
racist, and it just stumbles forward. Another report
comes out. They're killing all the children. Oh,
and then it just keeps going.
I'm not even trying to belittle this. It
it's terrifying to me that we can see
that it really doesn't matter what we have
to say if they just decide not to.
And I've always been telling you that. The
problem is that we need to find a
way now that we all actually see I
mean, this is where people would jump in
and be like, Ryan, and this is where
violence comes in. And I don't want to
go in that direction. Straight up because I
don't wanna ever be on this platform aren't
advocating for violence, quite frankly, even if I
might think that's the case. Just to make
sure that's clear. But either way, I do
not advocate for violence. But you have to
realize that this is where historically these things
come to pass, where they're like, guess what?
You have no power unless you actually mob
together and take us down. And that's the
problem. Where we are right now, they don't
care. They are murdering children. They're starving people
to death. They're bombing things everywhere. They're tackling
countries, toppling countries,
and supporting terrorist groups 30 seconds ago they
told you were the worst people alive and
just moving forward.
And you have the people in the power
the the current upcoming administration who was just
telling you about rabid
illegal immigrants and Islamist
who are now suddenly going accept that one
though.
I just don't know how this could get
any more obvious.
The end goal is to make northern Gaza
uninhabitable.
On that point, Mohammed Safa points out there
has never been a war in history, by
the way, with 8 with where 80% of
the country has been destroyed.
A 100% of the population displaced. Realize that.
100%
and 50% of the deaf children.
That's actually what we call genocide, he points
out. That's how obvious this is.
For, Asa from into, electronic intifada points out
that Israeli settlers put up a billboard
between Ramallah and Nablus, an occupied West Bank.
Guess what it reads? No future in Palestine,
accompanied by an image of the mass expulsions
of Israel,
is now it's clear and threatening to spread
to the West Bank, which by the way
I argue is already there.
They're they're literally putting up a billboard, by
the way, that shows this exact thing that
he was just showing you, the mass displacement,
the illegal ethnic cleansing. There's no way around
it. I'm under the narrative.
And now they're putting up billboards going, you
have no future here. Get out.
And we're supposed to pretend like that doesn't
show you exactly what this place is.
Here's Zachary Foster highlighting. You know, Zachary Foster
PhD, has a PhD from Princeton on Palestinian
history,
the largest land grab since Oslo. Israel confiscates
6,000 acres in the West Bank. This is
published December 6th. You see how rapidly this
is all going? Things that people used to
gasp about. They they took some territory in
the West Bay are rapidly going forward.
So what happened? Are we just pretending like
those things also aren't illegal or don't matter
because we're openly I mean, we're I shouldn't
be. The fact that they're pretending there's no
genocide shows them fine. We'll get away with
literally everything else. If you're not gonna call
us on actual genocide, why are you gonna
do anything about stealing property?
These people are monsters.
They know what they're doing, and they're taking
advantage of you.
Say something about it.
This person points out, and this is on
other this is general notes about Trump. Trump
hammers home the knee to start deportations with
convicted criminals and gangs terrorizing US citizens. Now
this is just a this guy's got a
huge following. He points this out. Of course,
his argument is
what here's the again, the overlap of this
is hilarious to me. So he's talking about
gangs and terrorists and people, in most cases,
right, in in this conversation with Mexico overlap.
But what's hilarious to me is it's like
you realize how dumb this is with what's
going on in Syria? This is the equivalent
right now of a year from now, Trump
making a a deal to work with MS
13 because they fought the person he doesn't
like. That's how dumb this is right now.
That's exactly what's happening with Thayat al Sham,
al Qaeda in Idlib that Vanessa and I
and plenty of us have been screaming about
for, I don't know,
6 years talking about Idlib and talking about
what's been going on there. Brett McGurk telling
you it's the largest hotspot for Al Qaeda
in history. That's where they just came from.
With Turkey's help, I mean, it's just ridiculous.
My point though is he's in here talking
about the the bad immigrants coming from other
which by the way we should care about
criminals or just anybody here illegally. Those are
crimes. That should matter. The point on this
is that it's using that discussion
that both sides have cultivated to push the
idea of mass deportations, or really, which is
simply a guise for biometric control. What she
keeps telling you is gonna build for you
because Clinton wouldn't do it. Fall headlong into
the lie.
Of course, they in this, they mentioned the
point about Colorado the, you know, the gangs
in Colorado, which I think is just an
interesting topic. Because right now, you have to
realize that they keep stressing this. Yes. I've
seen the clips of videos, one of which
I can prove is not even in the
place they said it was, but who cares
about that? Because it's verified video evidence this
guy points to, which I know in some
cases were not actually true, but to them,
that means Twitter posted it. And so it's
true. But my point is that the police,
what she does point out, whether she's right
or not, the police and other low and
the and the republican governor, I've told you
this is not what's happening. Of course, they
could be lying
because they don't wanna get look stupid.
But so what what what do you lean
into? You lean into a video that we've
seen them I mean, Trump and Twitter and
or rather Elon and rest of them have
shared fake information about all sorts of things,
including and in particular things going on in
Colorado. But that's all to say the point
is they're using what seem to be largely
fabricated or embellished narratives to justify
the actions that will lead to your control
structure.
Trump confirms the plan to declare a national
emergency for mass deportations using military assets. Just
imagine if that was Clinton saying that. We
all know how they'd react despite if it
was for the same reason.
Now Rabble Rouser points out this and this
is where it's going, mind you. This is
in Canada and the United States, and it's
all for the same reason. They are bringing
the facial recognition and AI based DNA targeting
system coupled with phone data to the United
States
and Canada. And he writes as predicted. Exactly.
And here's the point of that. Well, I
also I forgot I was gonna include this
too. Just this is where this is the
one of the many things they're using. In
this case, this was the border, immigration,
save the save act, and digital ID. It's
literally what it is. I I I still
hope I'm wrong, but I see it all
coming together. And I'm pointing back at this
saying, I told you, Trojan horse, we all
fell for it. I hope we don't. But
the point is, you can see in his
case, he's already arguing that he should be
censoring for,
Actually,
how did I misline that up? Anyway, this
was what I was just pointing to so
let me read that first.
And, yeah, it doesn't matter. So I I
guess I just had those tweets tweets out
of line. And the point was, we're gonna
come to the article I was referencing that
Ravalier was pointing to about the censorship and
the AI tracking that is coming based on
the very things that Trump tells you he
wants to stop. I think that's why this
is supposed to be over here. But remember,
here's the clip
of, what, 9, 10, 12 different clips of
Donald Trump saying he would be willing to
censor you for Israel.
And and the point being, if you say
bad things about Israel, if you say if
you're an anti Semite or down here, literally,
quote, we'll remove the Jew haters from the
country.
It's it's incredible to me. Even if they
are actually people who just hate Jews for
no reason, they have a right to think
and feel what they want and say what
they want. That's called free speech. You don't
suddenly have a carve out because it's something
you disagree with, then you're the woke right,
which we'll get to. It's the same point.
The point is he keeps telling you that
he's gonna do these things because you're an
anti semite, because you say things about Israel,
because and down here, the clip that's most
important, that you Israel used to control congress,
and rightly so. That's what he says in
this clip from not that long ago. I've
played it 45 times.
The point is that should be pretty alarming.
As Phil Giroldi says, let's accept that we
Americans will be dominated by Zionists no matter
which party we vote for, and let's look
forward to the disappearance of free speech or
rather the banning and even criminalizing of the
first amendment by Bondi, Pam, or her associates
if one chooses to criticize a certain foreign
country. Now, obviously, he's being facetious. I don't
think he wants you to just accept that
fact. He's trying to point out that this
is where we are unless we do something.
So that's all to say that what he
was pointing to,
the SAVE Act, the the the border conversation,
all they're pushing is leading to this, guys.
This is the article. US Canadian universities hire,
guess what,
Israeli firms to curb pro Palestinian protests. Who
could have guessed?
Because this is how this works. Just like
we talked about yesterday, and I'll show you
a quick part of that. I think it
was XM Cyber.
These these groups that literally build out. The
guy who runs that is a is a
former Mossad chief who now has a unit
8200 u IDF stack team who work with
some of the largest companies in this country,
like Nasdaq, for example, for cybersecurity.
And you realize that as we showed you
last time that they have a stated idea
that these companies actually continue to extend the
Israeli government agenda. That's what they quoted in
saying.
So my point is you have these people
who rather, you have the reality that we
can prove that Zionists
create these illusory
ideas that are going on in these campuses,
and then guess what? We fill the role
with Israeli terms
tech firms to keep us safe from the
thing we manufactured. It's so funny how that
works. As it says, a report published on
Saturday by the Israeli newspaper revealed that Israeli
or excuse me. Several universities in both the
US and Canada have entered into agreements with
Israeli security companies.
I just can't get why this is not
alarming to people, how abrasive this is.
Tech companies, security companies, I mean, it this
is
shockingly clear how these not just Israel Israeli
run companies, but Israeli intelligence connected companies that
are like chicken pox checkered across this country.
It's everywhere.
I I it's not about an Israeli or
a Jew as much as they want to
make it about that. It is about Israeli
intelligence
of us having a stated purpose of doing
this. Of Netanyahu laughing at interviews about how
he can easily control US Congress. These things
are on the record.
And he's, by the way, committed genocide. There's,
like, 4 different indictments for crime and corruption
and bribery. And they're and, literally, Miriam Adelson,
who is the one of the chief financers
of, you know, $100,000,000 of Donald Trump's administration
in the BB files is on video saying
that if she divulged that they run this
administration in Israel with bribery, that she wouldn't
be alive today.
These are the people that we're pretending are
the ones fighting for freedom around the world.
All of it is out there. I've shown
it on this show. The report notes that
after the election of former president Trump,
who pledged pledged to penalize academic institutions that
failed to control, quote, radicals and Hamas supporters,
it's right there.
I don't care if they're actually radicals or
Hamas supporters. Unless they break the law,
you don't get to do anything that would
control their actions or speech. This is the
reality of what we pretend are our rights,
or rather what are our inherent rights that
they don't respect. It says a number of
universities in both countries turned, guess what, to
Israeli security firms or those with links to
Israel to manage protests supporting Palestine.
This is literally everywhere. And now guess what
they're gonna do? Well, I mean, you can
see it happening. Donald Trump's packing out his
administration with Zionist and pro Israel fanatics,
and guess who they're gonna hire for each
of their respective administrative respective categories?
Israeli tech firms, Israeli security firm. And
then we're gonna see this filter out where
we can watch them start to take actions
that are in the interest of exactly what
we keep seeing. And that's not just for
the Israeli agenda, but in this country for
technocracy,
because they're 1 and the same.
Now I I just wanted to briefly show
this is the episode right here. We just
just from yesterday. Israel's global cybersecurity infiltration, that's
the main part I'm gonna show you now,
Greater Israel occupation, and the US Israeli Syria
proxy war. These shows are basically should be
connected.
So the point is we just talked about
this. This is the just the YouTube, video
from yesterday, and the conversation was it's it's
from, Reuters. A retired Mossad chief has assembled
a team of more than 30 hackers from
Israel's intelligence community,
and the the company is called XM Cyber.
It's just one of an endless amount of
them. The point is that he is now
he now works, and he's literally from unit
8200 in in Israeli intelligence, not new. My
point was I went over to the actual
company itself,
and I looked on
their website.
You won't be surprised
to find out that they literally I mean,
it's like everybody in the company.
I see there's they work for Nasdaq, for
SiriusXM, and all sorts of major companies. It'll
go in a second. I just have it
muted.
And and the point is you can see
on their website, it shows you their background.
The CEO, the COO, the security, it's right
here. Meet the leadership. And it's it's right
that's
30 years in you in Israeli intelligence, IDF
member, Unit 8200, not one after another. So
my point is these are not just Israelis.
We're talking about people that have a direct
connection to Israeli intelligence,
one after another, the whole thing.
Pretty wild. Worth watching. I asked Jason to
actually clip that part out.
So I you you see why I'm starting
with this. Right? Because what we're seeing right
now is just kinetic violent action in order
to take territory, but also a lot of
other things going on. And right now, that
very same entity is
intertwining itself through the current administration and and
and has been doing so for decades in
this country.
Now last point, Clint Russell points out, John
Bolton is now insinuating
that there may be proof that Tulsi Gabbard
is the in in the employ of Russia
and Syria.
He claims there may be documents found if
Assad falls. Think of how ridiculous this is.
Now, frankly, I don't think Tulsi Gabbard is
working for either of them. Certainly possible. Like,
we saw what his name, Menendez who ended
up being arrested for working basically being an
agent for for Egypt. You know, and it's
just I I mean, whether that's the exact
truth or not, the point is that's it's
not as unprecedented.
I think they're all criminals. I think they're
all breaking the law. What I find interesting
is that Bolton, a Republican, who was last
time on Trump's administration,
comes out and makes these arguments. And I
think what's interesting is it's literally in conjunction
with the fall of Assad.
So what do you think that means? We
can guess at it. The point I would
argue is that I think it's interesting that
somebody like Tulsi Gabbard or RFK Junior, I
never actually thought, would end up on the
administration.
Or if they did, that that would, in
my mind, show that they aren't really what
they claimed to be. My point is that
there's a lot of examples of them
going into directions and saying things about foreign
policy, which by the way, Gabbard seems to
not even say anymore or RFK seems to
pull punches on even r m mRNA
now, right, is my point. But before, they
very clearly had opinions that I don't think
the establishment wants to be promoted.
So this could be the way that they
go, guess what? You're not gonna get confirmed.
Which is kind of what I thought was
the case, and we're gonna end up with
the same exact thing we always get. And,
honestly, I don't I think that my biggest
criticism of her is that it's integrity. The
idea that you would flip flop around on
parties, that you would decide to support people
like Clinton or Trump in the context that
it challenges what you've said you believe in
before this.
But, hey, maybe they just make the decision
that it's bet that they can make more
change that way. I can understand that I
wouldn't agree with it. My point in all
of that is to say that that's why
I would think this might happen.
But Clint points out, you know, is it
it,
he always just say no, there isn't. He's
lying too. The rebels are are he is
cheering on and are Al Qaeda. And we'll
get all to all of that. But it's
interesting the timing of it all. Right?
Now, yesterday, make sure you watch the show.
Make sure you check out the map of
Greater Israel which is a very public thing.
Here's the the patch that are it's on
their military uniforms, which is exactly what that
is. Syria
is 2 thirds inside the Greater Israel dynamic.
Very important to see.
Now, starting with Vanessa, so you so you
know that's the case, she put out today,
made it out of Syria for the time
being. This was, 6 AM this morning. Chaos
rules,
looting, thuggery, and thieving,
gets the US Israel stamp of approval because
this is what they believe in.
And just recognize that even if they think
that Assad was a worse dynamic, you're allowing
a group that you have been telling us
are terrorists
to take over a country
and have have complete control of the population
you've been claiming you wanna keep safe.
I mean, it just can't make I mean,
it really takes a special kind of willful
ignorance to not acknowledge that even if you
think that they're being honest about what they're
doing, that this is what makes sense to
anybody with what they claim they've always been
doing.
This is not good for the Syrian people.
I mean, it may you could argue if
you wanna believe that Assad is a this
evil dictator despite how many times they've been
caught lying about what they claim makes him
a dictator. That just should be obvious to
you by now.
But they are creating a circumstance that is
the worst that I've this is what happened
in Libya and Iraq and Syria. They are
creating destabilization.
And that's the worst possible scenario for people
like this even just for random other circumstances.
Whether it's this gang or not, random people
will take advantage of a situation where there
is
chaos
that they create.
So you're gonna have rape and murder and
and theft, and it's gonna be just part
of the circle. That's what they just created.
And in fact, what I'm gonna get to
is showing you that Syria is being bombed
by Israel in locations that are not necessary
to bomb. It's very easy to prove. Craig
Murray was talking about it.
So as they basically have taken control of
these locations, they're turning around and bombing civilian
areas that are not needed to be bombed.
There's no resistance there. They've take control of
these areas. I actually think it's because they
wanna make it look like they're in some
ongoing battle
and instead of that they just got get
they just backed away and let them walk
into this what could be a trap. Right?
So, basically, the argument from before is if
they have to
they wanted to look like they had to
fight for the freedom of this country. That's
what I think is happening. And so they're
bombing and murdering civilians because they have no
problem with that. And no one's gonna be
there to report otherwise. And so but we'll
get to it. But I think that's what's
important to think about is why they would
be doing so. But this point, coming back
to this, is just that it's chaos. It's
not about freedom or revolution. It's about control.
It It says going through the border was
a mash of gunfire, infighting, and looting from
every single shop and market. That's what she
was seeing. So remember, she's on the ground.
She was, and she was seeing this on
the way by. So this is what revolution
and liberation looks like. Just ask ask Libya
how that works when the US government liberates
you. It says terrorists
on motorcycles, gunslingers and criminals. An incredibly
incredibly sad experience. The house was surrounded by
rebels drunk in victory from 5 AM, constant
celebratory gunfire. And around 10, they tried to
beat the external door down and to loot
the contents of the house.
Every early morning, Israel was destroying Syrian air
defense with bunker buster bombs. The whole house
shook. The CIA road map is always the
same. The resistance is broken and I doubt
it can be repaired, but the extremist mercenaries
in the pay of Israel will tell you
they support Palestine. But guess what?
They're not. This is what's so fascinating to
me, and I think this is because Israel's
desperate.
They're right they're openly saying they're in line
with Israel, and that that they that they
one of those conditions would be they would
get get they would disregard
Palestine.
I mean, I they're desperately pulling out all
the stops because usually, I would expect that
because they don't wanna give up the facade.
She goes on to say, go go on
then and,
and it just ends with you're you're now
on the border. The point is that we
can see the ones you save, but 2,
that it is absolute chaos. Well beyond the
point
of removing you know? Because, again, don't don't
forget that Syrian Russian forces basically pulled back.
The I as far I understand it, like,
almost bare 0 casualties.
So the reality being that they
all the chaos is because those are the
people that are in there. Those are the
people that they allowed to take power. They
are terrorists. They are bad people.
Now as Alan Musrahi points out,
there's more to this. Now here's his opinion
on it. I agree with parts of all
of this, and I think that right now,
it does make the most sense to me
that this was in a coordinated action. Now
he says, bear with me. If the west
bet on Russia and Iran,
turning this into a wide and prolonged blood
fest in which they will be exhausted,
softening Iran for a planned fatal blow, which
is what they want, it makes a lot
of sense for Putin to not swallow the
bait. Right?
So think about this that first point. I
always point this out.
When we're talking about the the way like,
for example, when they bomb in Syria, people
go, why didn't they respond?
Because they they're calculating.
It's measured.
They're not belligerently stumbling into a response like
Israel and the US do damn near every
time.
Because that's all they know is violence and
and action.
Right? The point is in this case, they're
have you can see that they well, it's
it makes no sense for us to do
that, so they don't. It's showing restraint. That's
not good guy, bad guy. That's just objectively
showing you what they did. And so in
this case oh, and my point was that
I think the US and Israel project onto
people what they would expect their response would
be. So if this was reversed, we already
know what the Israeli and US governments would
do. Exactly what he's saying. They would dive
into it and they'd fight back as hard
as they can.
Whether or not that was the hope that
they would do so. You see, I mean,
they've I've they've demonstrated themselves to be very
tactically inept in a lot of ways. Well,
and who knows? Maybe that was what they
wanted to happen. But from my perspective, they
have taken the bait for a lot of
things. Like, in Venezuela, we saw that more
than once over the last decade
where they just had such they they thought
they had control, they thought they had influence,
and all of a sudden, it turns out
that the people that they thought were on
their side sold them out and they lost
control of what they thought was gonna be
a regime change. It's because they thought that
they just were in control. That's the kind
of hubris that they have. So the point
is
the west would bet on that. That Russia
and Iran would because I mean arguably would
You would think they might Because they have
been fighting for Syria this entire time.
But, they did not. So, he goes and
make Syria the west's headache. Right? So, in
this case, by allowing,
by not
as he well, finish his last sentence. He
says, by by it makes a lot of
sense for Putin not to swallow the bait
if he saw it that way. Right? So
instead of diving into the battle pulling back,
as Vanessa was actually reporting right in the
beginning before we before we got to this
point.
And ultimately then turn that into,
a headache for the west. Now you could
argue that it wouldn't really be a headache
for people that don't care about human rights,
people's lives,
sovereignty,
but you have to remember that they have
an interest in projecting that they do. So
he makes a good point. And, ultimately, now
with if if they've just kinda pulled back
and now it's their response, who's gonna be
responsible for the Syrian people? What every every
bad thing we now see going forward is
gonna be at the feet of Syria or
of of United States and Israel.
Or, really, whatever puppet regime they prop up,
which is already turning out to be the
high Charles Schom leadership.
And so when they inevitably continue to do
all the things we know they're capable of,
it'll be at the feet of Israel and
the United States.
Or usually what they do like with Iraq
is back away and go, well, that's that's
Iraq. They can do what they want. You
know, that's that's reflective
of the Syrian government. It's, no, that's the
people you just put in power. But either
way, it becomes their responsibility.
It says, let the Americans navigate the labyrinth
of interest and hostilities in Syria.
Again, remember this all hypothetically. He says, last
week, I was convinced that's this Syria thing
was about Russia and an attempt to put
it on a collision course with Israel as
a way to force Trump into war with
Russia
as a step on the way to a
major attack on Iran.
Maybe Russia and Iran could have served saved
Assad,
which I argue they could've, at the cost
of many thousands of soldiers and billions in
equipment and munitions.
I I argue without question they could've and
and would've likely succeeded.
The interesting point though is that that would
have, without question, pulled away resources and interest
from Gaza, from Lebanon, from other places that
they're invested in.
Think about that. So that's interesting. So you
could argue this was tactical in the sense
of
creating all the other fields of war in
order to spread that thin, which is very
basic. And so, now, they had to make
a tactical choice. If we pull into this
further, we may not be able to find
you know, so you this is this I
think all of these choices are being made
from
from both sides, but specifically Russia and Iran
from what
is tactically smart.
Now it's funny you would say that. That
should be like, but does what they all
do. It's really not. You can see plenty
of times where the Trump administration, the Biden
administration, or or Bush in particular made a
lot of really ridiculous clumsy actions. Maybe that
was because that was what maybe Israel wanted
from them, but it still demonstrates as wasn't
very tactical.
And it says, but wouldn't that wouldn't the
the investing with all the soldiers and equipment
compromise their defense elsewhere and divert attention from
the major strategic assets of the anti western
alliance?
Because if this game of if this is
a game of chess, this whole thing could
have been an attempted check-in
a preparation for a check made, A big
offensive against Tehran's heart heart against Iran.
It may very well be that the decision
by Russia and Iran to not walk into
a u a basically, US Israeli trap was
a very elegant and wise play.
Iran and Russia did not lose 1 soldier
or any amount of vital assets over this.
They are at their full readiness. That's a
really important thing to hear. And now the
west has to sort out Syria. So in
a way, they turned the tables. So now
they're the ones that have to waste resources
in Syria. And she so I guess the
you could if this is the case, which
we don't know, you could argue that
it would be a I don't think Israel
and the US would have expected any leader,
because they wouldn't do it, to just give
up their country
even if that's for a better win down
the line and maybe even taking it back
because that makes them look bad. Because right
now, that's what the US and Israel are
doing, because they always do.
Eric, he's a coward. He ran. He just
he left his people, which is clearly not
actually happened, but that's they just they're taking
the little victories where they can because that's
how petty they seem to be in everything
they do.
So you could argue that that might have
flipped the script. They didn't expect it, so
he takes off, and now they're committed. And
now, ultimately, they are the ones overextended
if this is the case. Interesting to think
about.
And he says,
and then the west has to sort out
Syria and explain to the world what it's
doing there. And pay for its rehabilitation.
Which is actually what they've argued. Right? That
they were holding up rehabilitation because Assad was
in power. Now that thieves are removed, technically
they're on the hook to financially build back
Syria. I doubt they're gonna do it. Or
at the very least, they're gonna do it
in a very Iraq way where they just
siphon off 1,000,000,000 of dollars under the claim
of helping when they never do.
Does this sound like such a bad deal,
he says? Yeah. It's it's a fair point.
I think it's interesting. This person says, interesting
too that Israel greedily and predictably,
which they are, appears to be invading Syria,
further extending their own forces. For the short
term, it may seem that they're triumphant, but
in the in the in time, they could
become even more vulnerable. And he goes precisely.
They are and by the way, we'll get
to it. They are. They're they're pushing in.
Which the main point we're gonna find to
in the title, which shows you that they're
bidding. These are our forces. We're working with
the terrorist groups just like we already should
know if we're being honest with ourselves, same
with the US government, acting like
I mean, like I said, openly supporting them.
If you're saying, well, you know, we're not
gonna push back because Assad's bad, that's supporting
what they're doing. And more than that, we'll
get into it. So here's another perspective on
this.
This is Majid Nawaz saying, as as in
Afghanistan,
between the Taliban, the Pentagon, via Qatar,
when you see armies withdrawing rapidly, it is
likely that they know that powers have cut
a deal.
So the argument he's making is that when
they rapidly pulled back, that they were of
the mind that a deal had been made.
And that could be a sellout deal of
Russia selling out Syria, or it could be
a deal that they made in the interest
of saving Syria. That's where we come out
of the point of maybe somebody
sabotaging that deal.
Again, these are all perspectives hypothetical.
And he says the likelihood is that a
grand regional settlement, and this is what I
think is interesting he points out, led by
Trump.
I'm not sure where that I mean, that's
certainly possible, but I don't know where that
would come from,
is already on the table. He'd be saying,
this is his opinion.
Russia has been promised a deal in Ukraine
in return for acquiescing to a deal in
Syria, etcetera.
See the latest radical dispatch. Now what he's
actually arguing is that somehow Trump has
because we hear we're hearing those talks,
made some kind of an agreement with Russia
to allow the fall of Syria,
right, in the interest of,
a deal for ending Ukraine.
I don't think that makes much sense. And,
I mean, they they would in the context
if
Russia is more in line with an agenda
as opposed to fighting it, which has always
been on possibility. Like, we saw what happened
during COVID. It's not you can't forget how
many of these countries were falling right in
line with each other during the COVID 19
illusion.
But what doesn't line up for me is
just the basic reality of this. One, we
have to remember that Donald Trump has not
even signed these ethics pledges yet. So to
pretend that he's out there making agreements and
deals with foreign countries is not only illegal,
but he he's acting with limited information that
he that the rest of the US government
has because he hasn't been given access to
it, at least on the record, to the
top secret information of their ongoing deals with
these countries. It just seems really crazy to
me, but
it would show me that they're all the
same government
because that's the democrats will be screaming about
this if what they tell us about them
is true, and they're not. So they claim
he's claiming Trump came to an agreement or
a possibly.
The likelihood is that the the regional settlement
with Trump, but making a deal with Russia
and Ukraine is where it doesn't make much
sense to me. I don't think Russia is
cons I mean, Russia is clearly
losing like anybody would in the context of
a war. People are dying. There's there's there's
resources expended.
But are we of the mind that Russia
is losing Ukraine? I mean, they're not, guys.
This is objectively the case.
So why would they make a deal
in the case where they're in the advantageous
position, which maybe I'm wrong about, but I
don't think that's the case,
especially to give up on something they fought
for a decade to maintain.
So to me, it seemed a little bit
hopeful that this is something like the like
a Trump bonus thing or he made the
thing happen, which I'm sure he'll claim either
way.
But to me, there's another point that's missing
in this,
which is ultimately that why Russia would choose
to make a deal that would undermine one
of its allies when everything they've done
in living memory is in my from my
perspective is the opposite, where they've sacrificed for
supporting Assad in a lot of ways.
So I just don't get why that lines
up. To me, what would make more sense
is he's missing the part of some kind
of a double cross.
That there was an agreement made, but it
wasn't to give up on them to make
this deal end. It was a deal that
would, I think, protect all of it if
that narrative is the case, and, ultimately, that
was what was double crossed from something like
Turkey.
Now this is the Telegraph. Senior military and
diplomats withdraw to Lebanon as swift advance of
Syrian rebels catches Tehran regime off guard. Tehran
regime. Right. Because it's Tehran regime. This is
just lazy reporting. It's not. It's not. It's
just the Syrian government that is supported by
Iran and Russia and a lot of other
people in the world. You might so it'd
be just as, you know, let's just say
Brazil supports them. It'd be dumb as it'd
be stupid as calling them the Brazil regime
just because they have an ally of Brazil,
which I pulled a random name out of
a hat. But that's what they do. That's
corporate media for you. The whole day is
gonna be like this. Garbage nonsense with it.
30 seconds ago where they were giving you
some level of truth, but now they fall
right back into the crazy. I mean, even
people like Mehdi Hasan, which I'll get to
later,
who has been at least giving you somewhat
truthful information about Palestine has gone right back
to bad guy, a sound dictator. Just showing
you, I think, the true colors of a
lot of these people trying to get some
just like with COVID where they try to
align with the truth community in order to
get benefit elsewhere. I think we're seeing that
play out now.
But going to the next argument
or actually before we get to that. So
here's what Trump said on to today,
which is kind of a redundant post of
what he said the day before, but he
goes, Assad is gone.
He has fled this country.
His protector, Russia, led by Putin, was not
interested in protecting him in any any longer.
Now, already, he looks stupid for saying that
because he's being protected in Russia.
Now he pre posted this at 2 in
the morning before that was released. Now we
can show, as we'll get to it later
in the show, at least what Russia and
Assad are claiming is that he's safe in
Russia.
So my see, this is what they do.
He's a politician like all the rest of
them. He's giving you the narrative that works
for the deep state government agenda. He says
there was no reason for Russia to be
there in the first place, you know, other
than protecting him from you and your belligerence
as the US government.
Same you being him and Biden and all
the rest of them.
So because Russia was there, they stopped it
from becoming what it likes. Likely looks like
it will become if they don't have another
plan. The balkanization of Syria, broken up, given
to the Kurds, given to everybody. That's what's
going to happen. That's not what's safe for
Syrians. That's not what Syrian people want. They're
Syrians. They want their national identity, not given
over to somebody else.
Like, think about what they're arguing right now.
This is for the interest of Syria.
Their plan is to break this up. That's
been the plan from the beginning.
The Kurdistan del development, that's a huge part.
They feel it's theirs. They think they just
won, I think.
Is that that is that beneficial for Syrians
to remove their national identity?
So
because they lost all interest in Syria because
of Ukraine.
I don't I don't think that's the case.
And it says where then again, he throws
out this number of 600,000 Russian soldiers. I
don't know where that's flatly not true in
my opinion. Then he goes on to say,
Russia and Iran are in a weakened state
right now, which, again, I don't know why.
This is he okay. This is what's funny,
the people that wanna pretend this is a
guy fighting the deep state. That is the
deep state agenda.
You know how easy it is to prove?
You know how long we can look back
to all the other administrations that they would
call the deep state who have also been
fighting to overthrow Iran for Israel's interest?
Here he is, continuing to drive the narrative,
the deep state government narrative. That's not an
outsider, guys. This is a a the definition
of a insider US government apparatus
or, entity. And it goes, one, because of
Ukraine had a bad economy, the other because
of Israel and his fighting success.
Okay.
The, you know, the Ukraine economy, like, that's
anybody's fault other than both Israel and United
States. But the idea being that Israel's fighting
success, You wanna point out where, Trump? I'd
love to see an example of where they
succeeded in any one of the goals they
claim, other than destruction completely of all of
Gaza, which by the way, they never claimed
was actually their goal. Likewise, it says Zelensky
in Ukraine would like to make a deal
to end this madness. Guys, that's so stupid.
I just showed you an a statement from
Zelensky from, like, 2 weeks ago where he
was screaming about how he will never give
up. My sovereignty is all I care about.
I will never give up for
and but at the same time, though, acting
like he wants to make Trump's gonna make
a deal.
Showing you that this is just it's all
narrative.
You can't pretend that making a deal with
Russia while they're in the lead means in
that Zelensky agreeing with that would show anything
other than him following along with what his
masters tell him to do.
Zelensky doesn't wanna do anything other than what
they're paying him to do, I would argue.
My point is he just said he would
never give up because that's how this is
supposed to go
in their agenda. It says they have ridiculously
lost 400,000 soldiers and many more civilians. There
should be an immediate ceasefire and negotiation should
begin, which you know, time remember, Zelensky was
actually planning to negotiate and the US government
forced him not to right in the beginning.
That's actually documented by even US government entities.
You can prove that.
To be the Trump doesn't know that, or
he's lying to you as usual. Both of
those should be alarming to you.
And it says too many lives are being
so needlessly wasted, too many families destroyed.
And if that keeps going, it can turn
into something much bigger and far worse. I
know Vladimir well. This is his time to
act. China can help. The world is waiting.
They just he's really trying to put the
idea out there that they're the peace, loving,
unity maker
when everything they're doing and supporting himself included
is the exact opposite
and acting like
like anyway, just comparatively acting like that's the
one that we said, you know, family's destroyed.
Look at what you're currently supporting.
I mean, it's just it it fall it
should make you laugh if somebody can care
about that, but not when, you know if
you're taking human life anywhere, you can't pretend
like you care about human life. Now Fiorella
Isabelle says breaking Russia and Iran, and this
is as of yesterday.
Russia and Iran hit at back end hint
at back end deals with Turkey over Syria.
So what she's arguing well, I'll I'll go
wait till her next post gets into it.
So at this point yesterday, she's saying they're
hinting at the fact that they had back
end deals with Turkey and see over Syria.
Turkey being a NATO ally, one that at
least pretends to be against Israel. Now it
says Russian foreign minister Slavrov at the 22nd,
Doaa forum
said it's unacceptable to allow terrorist groups to
control Syrian territory.
Russia stressed
the unity of Syrian territory and the need
for an immediate end to hostilities.
I mean, let's not forget, guys. The only
reason this is still happening is because the
US government has never stopped occupying Syria
illegally from day 1.
And it says we are using diplomatic tools
to stop the bloodshed in Syria. Astana format
ministers is I mean but the point is,
it's all the stuff we ultimately talked about.
The Palestine and Syria disasters are caused by
the US policy. Moscow calls for the for
dialogue between them.
The patriotsam,
sir, that's Al Qaeda.
US Israel supported terrorists in Syria are a
terrorist group, which their own statements from the
US State Department say as much. Now they
just don't they don't pretend they don't care
or they never did. But here's what she
goes into. This is as of today.
So not just that they hinted at deals
but she says it's worse than anyone thought.
Now, this is just a video of people
running into this this the presidential palace, sort
of like a January 6th esque kind of
feeling to it.
And it says, there was a betrayal from
within.
After this is her opinion, but it's worth
considering. After 5 AM
Damascus time, Israel launched a surprise attack. Now,
see, this is where things changed. Now talking
about before we get into this, the talk
the first point about where Vanessa was saying
there was, like, almost like a psychological operation.
Then it just looked like
more was happening than was for some kind
of a psychological victory,
which is what was ultimately happening, it seemed.
Now what then shifted was that Israel, I
think, based on the fact they saw them
pull back, said we have an opening. Take
it. That's what I think happened.
And so then Israel, not Hyatt El Shom,
Israel carried out in a surprise attack which
then helped them facilitate this this
overtaking of certain locations.
It seems pretty simple to make them I
mean, otherwise
I mean, everything backs that up so far,
including the fact that Vanessa was reporting from
the ground on what she was seeing first,
which then morphed into something different right after
we saw them pull back. Now the argument
becomes that they might have pulled back under
the guise of an agreement, which is literally
what the US and Israel have done their
entire existence.
Made false agreements and then taken advantage of
it. Alright. It's what Saudi Arabia did with
Yemen, which is their part of their proxy
wars as well. They do it every single
time. So they did with Gaza every single
time. So it says, of course, we all
said this was a Zionist coordination, but the
idea was that back channels were to keep
Damascus safe and Turkey targeting Hayatir al Sham.
Right? So they run of the agreement that
she's arguing that the deal was to allow
some level of but, you know, Israel or
whatever else, but, ultimately, the deal was to
keep Damascus safe
and stop the terrorist organizations.
Instead, there was a coordinated betrayal, and there
won't be a slow transition, but rather there
was a coup.
And it won't stop at Syria. This is
all of Israel's greater Israel project.
Now there was one point
I just thought of really quickly, I'll come
back to it. Now I wanna I just
wanna I wanna look real quick, hold on.
I don't usually do this because I have
to break the window
view. This
or this one? What day was this on?
So that was today. Okay. Well, it's just
reporting today. So just as they showed it,
this is Sputnik. Siring see Syria's Assad resigns
amid peaceful peace efforts, orders peaceful and transition.
So what I'm guessing what I'm thinking right
now, and this is my opinion still because
all of this is pretty much up in
the air, is that ultimately,
that is the indication
of what she's talking about. That based on
the agreement that they thought they had
oh, it's perfect. Nice. Based on the agreement
they thought they had,
he
pulled back resigns and said, okay, we made
an agreement.
Alright. So I'm gonna pull away peaceful transition,
and they took advantage and didn't care, which
is what terrorists and monsters and
subhuman entities do. They just take advantage of
where they can. And I'm only saying that
based on a political organization,
whether that's Zionism or whatever thing you think
is driving the US intentions.
That's just instead, there was a the court
day betrayal. Now it says, as far as
Assad, he got out
and was not on this alleged plane that
they were reporting. I won't say where he
is, but he reports now that he's in
Moscow.
But I will say he's absolutely a west
it was a western backed coup with betrayals
from 1 or more of the channels Syria
was talking with, which tends to show you
that we've and this is what we've shown
all this time.
That, see, how do you not look. Look.
You you could argue that's not true. But
we have historical examples where the ones they're
calling bad guy
get taken advantage in this exact same way.
And what does that have to show you?
That they were willing to talk. Now I'm
not even talking about a situation where they
were at the at the the weaker position.
In some cases, where it was either equal
or even that they were in the lead
as if if as it were for, you
know, a war situation.
And they get manipulated because they go into
talks thinking that there's some kind of level
of honor in all of this. They go
into these talks. They get manipulated by Israel
and the United States, and then they lose.
And so you can go on pretending though
that was the evil terrorist that the trick,
but the reality is they were the ones
that seemed to be willing to have some
kind of agreement, willing to find a common
ground, and they abused that, showing you who
the real villain is in the conversation. This
has been historically
consistent.
Now it says there's no other way this
could have happened without the they that that
as guarantees were given.
This is the video of the Syrian presidential
palace. Everyone who is in Syria, and this
is what she's reporting from on the ground,
where people on the ground that I agree
Despite all of the we'll get to it
at the end about the videos of the
people screaming for cheering. There will always be
people,
whether paid
or because they're from somewhere else or because
they're just there and they don't like the
government that will support a change.
Right now, half this country hates the government
currently. Right? You have to realize that. Or
hates the partisan element of what they're showing
you.
So does that mean that
it's the same dynamic. So that doesn't mean
that when anything happens because they cheered, therefore,
everyone in the country agrees. That's how lazy
their argument is every time.
Or in it if in the other side
of it, here's Palestinians cheering. I talked to
them. That way, they all like what happened.
They it's always an easy it's it's a
broad stroke. In any other context, we call
that ignorance.
So they're ignorant, and we never point it
out because it's part of the government agenda.
In this case, everyone who's in Syria, she's
arguing, is stunned and absolutely devastated to see
Syria fall in the hands of terrorists and
worse, the puppets who control them. Now I'm
everyone just being I would argue just
I don't think she know literally can speak
to everyone in the country. The point is
that by and large, people there are upset
about this. Historically, that is what I see.
And from Vanessa and people on the ground,
the the and again, I'm I'm just being
objective as I can. The reality is it's
obvious that he is a very, very liked
person in this country. The people of Syria
have always supported Assad by and large, and
there's always been groups that don't support him
just like in any country. And most of
those groups, if you actually do your due
diligence, you'll find out that they don't support
him, but the last thing they want is
Israel and the US using their them to
step over and go after the country. They
just want a change in in democratic process.
So now we're in a situation where you
can see
that this has entirely shifted.
The question is what actually went down right
there? And I'm sure we'll find out at
some point, especially if Assad is safe in
Moscow.
This, Casey Wright shared this in regard to,
one point about the Iranian elements.
Now, this is Kevork El Masian, someone from
Syria on analysis. I highly recommend you check
him out. He is focused on this topic.
Now, he's talking about the with the the
it's a quick clip. It's like 25 seconds
or 40 seconds about the Iranian forces moving
back.
Now this adds to what they were just
saying. Now if they did that
right before this took place, I do think
that indicates that there was an agreement made
and they probably got taken advantage of. Again,
kinda demonstrating what I just said.
With Western Aleppo was,
few weeks before this attack,
many of the locations where,
Iranian,
advisers and Iranian affiliated forces have evacuated.
And this was a part of a larger
deal in the region to decrease the Iranian
influence in the region. And to be honest
with you, Syria
has an interest in
balancing its relationships between the Arabic countries and
Iran. And Iran doesn't mind that. Iran said,
I'm here to secure the,
some of the border lines in the country,
and they don't have, let's say, imperialistic
or
colonial aspirations to stay in the country. So
when the time comes and the government says
that you have to leave, we leave. We
don't have a problem with that.
So the replacement of Yeah. Really sounds like
a terror. You know, it's just it's incredible
the difference when you when you I mean,
again, this is what happened. I mean, you
can this is doc this was covered even
by corporate media. So the reality is you
can overlap that with what Israel and the
US government do. Almost every single thing they
engage with. The point is that they're happy
to go oh, you want us out? Okay.
Okay. Well, you know, we we are only
here to work with you as much as
we can because they respect each other's sovereignty.
And and the point is they did make
an agreement, he's arguing,
that they caused them to pull back, and
that Syria was the one that asked that
to be the case because of what they
were trying to achieve. So it does seem
to be building into the reality that they
were taking advantage of because they actually had
some level of honor in the conversation and
actually thought that maybe these people would want
to see an end of human killing, but
no.
They want it to continue.
So here is a breakdown from Syrian Girl.
And I do think this actually is this
is interesting. I I this is well done.
And I think the interesting part about this
is just kind of where
again, all of this is hypothetical, but it's
where it seems to be going. And people
like Syrian Girl are, you know, invested in
this topic. And she says, what happened in
Syria in the last few days has left
many in shock. How could the Syrian army
seed so much territory within a matter of
days?
As the fog of war settles, the picture
becomes clearer. The first step in understanding this
is to note that the Syrian army were
ordered to retreat from Aleppo and Hamas, which
again, that's what Vanessa was reporting. That was
the first point to this. The soldiers didn't
run and there was no mutiny, which is
the all there's so I I mean, I
barely even touched on all the ridiculous Twitter,
you know, mainstream alternative media nonsense swinging around.
It was flooding the field. And I made
that point yesterday. Whenever that happens, it's very
clear that there's an agenda over something that's
going on. And they were coming out with
all sort of old fake videos and I
mean, I showed you yesterday yesterday, even Eli
David was taking a video from Syria and
claiming it was in Israel. These people are
just ridiculous.
I don't know how in the world they
ever were able to influence anybody. You know,
threats, blackmail, most likely. But it says the
Al Qaeda hordes didn't defeat the army because
they didn't fight them in the first place.
They simply ceded the ground. To understand why
such a gut wrenching decision had to be
made, we must have to look at the
wider chessboard. So this is where I argue
that this would be the time, if this
was what happened, that they basically had to
make a
heartbreaking decision
to give up,
at least momentarily,
control over their country
in order to potentially win the larger war
if that's what's actually going on. It does
kinda make sense that the argument would be
that they this is not just about Syria.
That Syria is one part in this larger
Middle East dynamic that Israel and the US
are fighting, blaming it on Iran, of course.
And the end point being, this is a
resistance against a globalist, Zionist, technocratic
overtake.
And so they are
deciding,
if that's the case, to pull back and
allow them to take this to overextend them
there in hopes that they can ultimately win
the larger war. That does make sense to
me.
And so I it would and and that's
a an action I argue they wouldn't have
expected because it's not something they would be
willing to do. Now it says blitzkrieg. It
says a surprise attack that uses a concentrated
force to quickly overwhelm the enemy. This is
what the Syrian army was facing. And again,
this is where the Israel part comes in.
So first, we have these little cells popping
up and taking over things where they pull
back, again, arguably because they thought they made
a deal, and then Israel jumps in and
takes advantage.
Rushes forward,
blitzkrieg.
Once the Al Qaeda horde's breached, because well,
alongside their terrorist entities, by the way, because
that's what they were using
as well as whatever they were you know?
But the point was an Israeli effort, if
that's what ultimately happened. Again, we're all based
on our reporting.
Sorry. I mean, I know that in some
cases, it only makes it more confusing, but
I just wanna really be clear because people
jump in and out of the show that
these things are not you know, it's important
to recognize that we're basing this off real
time reporting and just kinda giving you the
the theorizing about what may happen. But I
do think this is what makes most sense.
Once the Al Qaeda hordes breached the m
four highway attempting to hold the city in
the chaos
in the chaos way would have caused mass
casualties
among both civilians and soldiers, which is what
it what Vanessa was saying. Right? The US
and Israel would argue, don't care, just like
in Ukraine. They will fight to the last
man to defend their occupation and illegal agenda.
In this case, it seems that Assad will
be willing to give up, at least momentarily,
a seed of power to minimize
the suffering of his people, which by the
way does line up with what I've seen,
reported, and proven about what he does.
And it says to defeat Blitzkrieg, you must,
a, fall back,
which is what they did, to overstretch the
enemy until they reach a point where they
don't have enough resources to keep pushing, which
by the way, seems almost inevitable, doesn't it?
Unless the US government goes full blow occupation
Syria, which maybe that's what's gonna happen,
Israel will be wildly overextended.
So maybe that's the point.
And it says to the point to be
to to the the point is
being reached in Hamas
of them being oversteady to push back. B,
air superiority
in order to stop blitzkrieg. It it's much
easier to bomb convoys of Al Qaeda terrorists
on highways from the air than fight them
in cities. This way their manpower is depleted
and, c, flanking. Counterattack from the flank of
a spearhead. If the over exuberant enemy has
gone too far ahead, they can be separated
from more easel and more easily managed in
certain pockets. Part of the strategy could be
seen when Russia blew Rastan the bridge that
leads from Hamhamah to Hamah to Khams.
Now it says manpower.
Have you observed that there weren't, have you
observed that there wasn't many Syrian army casualties
during the retreat? That's rather the point. Preserving
manpower, which by the way was pretty hard
not to recognize this for something
beyond what's currently happening in Syria. Right? Or
maybe a repositioning back into Syria, but either
way, it's about the next step. So
hard to perceive that is calculated.
Then it says Syria is a country of
less than 20,000,000 people. There's not that large
of a pool of recruits to draw from.
And after fighting 13 years of war, an
illegal occupation war from the US government side
in Israel, the numbers depleted.
Hezbollah's war with Israel and Russia's war with
Ukraine added to the man's power shortage.
As such, the soldiers' lives have to be
preserved. If large number if large numbers have
been lost in an attempt to hold Aleppo
from an unlimited number of Turkey the Turkey's
playing an aspect in this too, and Central
Asian hordes,
then Damascus would subsequently soon
soon later fall and all would be lost.
Instead, they had tactical retreat. Now to the
point where Israel pushes in, you could argue
and, again, seeing it's seeing it sounds hypothetical.
Turkey's playing a role in this. Turkey was
in Idlib along with other forces, so you
could argue that that was all coordinated. And
that's the point they get to with the
agreement
that they with Turkey and Israel and their
forces essentially took advantage of a moment.
In cold weather, it says the body pulls
blood away from the extremities
to keep, up
keep up one's core temperature. Syria must consolidate
its manpower to maintain the core. What's more
is the Syrian army is fighting a war
on multiple fronts.
The Turkish hordes from the north, the Americans
to the east, the Americans and Takhtakfiris
to the south, and finally Israel, which brings
us to the next point.
Israel invasion looms, which is happening right now,
by the way. This is perhaps the most
important reason for the withdrawal from Hama and
Aleppo. An Israeli invasion is very likely, if
not imminent. And she's right. It happened.
The intention is to create a land grab
and label it a buffer zone, which is
exactly what they're doing at Gaza. It it
just it's it's the same thing they do.
And buffer zone is occupation. It's all it
is.
The Zionist scourge would like nothing more than
the Syrian army to deplete its resources fighting
the Al Qaeda hordes, then come in and
steal the land unopposed.
The Syrian army deployed extra manpower near the
Golan after the of the Golan front after
October 7th. They can't afford to spend manpower
on the north.
Israel is the biggest threat to Syria. The
Al Qaeda hordes are merely a distraction.
It is this threat for which the Syrian
army must maintain its resources. Israel,
the the the eternal enemy.
This is Syria's external war, just as it
is for Palestine and Lebanon. So this is
what I'm getting at.
They recognize this is something much larger larger
than just one of them independently.
That that makes more sense than anything to
me.
Now here is what
Afshin Ratzani from going underground had to say.
And this is as of today, reporting the
fall of Syria or rather specifically Assad in
some place in Syria. Now he says, Assad
has been deposed in a sudden shocking turn
of events.
It seems that a deal was done, so
he's reporting this as well, and Al Qaeda
linked groups have seized the capital of Damascus.
Sources close to Assad tell me that he
and his writ his
retinue are safe and out of the country,
which does seem to be reported today. The
US and Israel have finally won the dirty
war against Syria. Now for the time being,
hopefully, not in
perpetuity forever. I because that this would be
I mean, even right now, this does break
my heart. The idea of of what this
demonstrates of a group that we all see
exactly what it is.
And that this is being praised
by mindless followers of the partisan field as
some kind of success and revolution and, you
know, freedom for Syrians.
Either they're that disgusting of people or they're
that stupid.
You can't pretend this I mean, you can't
be swinging off of a genocide and act
like you're saving people from
what?
From from the peep from your own from
the people that have been fighting you off
this whole time?
Makes me sad. But that's my point is
I hope that it's not the end of
this for Syria.
The US and Israel have finally won the
dirty war in Syria decimated for years with
punishing sanctions. The u an illegal US occupation
that stole Syria's oil resulting in chronic fuel
shortages and over a decade of arms and
funding going to ISIS, Al Qaeda, and their
offshoots.
Hayat al Sham leader, Jalani, the de facto
leader of Syria now, which is ridiculous, which
they're the ones promoting that in corporate media
right now, has been rebranded from a fanatical
extremist to a diversity loving moderate jihadist.
Think about how stupid it is for them
to use the word moderate jihadist.
They're not because you couldn't argue that. My
point is the terms have different meanings in
the way they put forward. My point is
that these are the same Republicans
who are telling you that intifada means everything
you've ever thought of. Genocide,
hating Jews. Well, no. It doesn't. It means
resistance. And so in this case, now you've
got Republicans saying, oh, he's a moderate Jihadist.
And in other cases, if you talked about
a moderate Jihadist in anywhere else, they would
go, that doesn't even make sense. It just
shows you how many of these people in
this partisan field from both sides are mindless
followers
or deliberate dishonest liars.
That was redundant. They're deliberate liars. I just
think that's hilarious because you're seeing this, not
just to and, also, recognize how crazy it
is that Donald Trump and the current administration
and his Republican followers are now screaming the
exact same narrative as the rest of the
corporate media.
They say it's regime change for freedom.
Wow. Amazing how fast that all became just
the the mainstream media. All the people screaming
to be fighting the mainstream media.
Then says he had was given an ultimate
softball interview by CNN, the the the head
of hot, terrible shawm, who in 2017,
the state department said was, like, number 1
terrorist, $10,000,000
bounty,
In which he pledged to guarantee the rights
of Syrian minorities, who, by the way, he's
currently killing.
Currently destroying churches. I'll show you in a
minute.
After his troops perpetrated atrocity after atrocity against
Syrian minorities over a decade.
Right? These are the people that beheaded a
child.
It's it's documented.
And they were all smiling, hey, that's that's
who these people are. Funded by Israel and
the United States. Now, my point before, let's
just even say he is suddenly a moderate,
whatever you wanna call him. What about the
crimes he committed? The crimes that you told
us he committed. You just suddenly don't care
about him because he's changed? How does that
work?
Career murderers could be like, I now like
other things, and we can just go, good.
Now we don't care about your crimes.
I mean, we all have to realize how
childish this all is.
Biden's national security advisor, Jake Sullivan, famously said,
Al Qaeda is on our side in Syria.
We'll show you all this.
So realize, right now, the Biden administration and
Jake Sullivan and Trump's administration are saying the
same thing. They're all on the same side.
I mean, in this topic, but, you know,
also everywhere else. But realize that if you
think they're fighting each other, why are they
doing the same thing here? When this very
thing, Syria, specifically,
goes back as far as you wanna look.
It is a deep state agenda.
The Republicans were saying this 30 seconds ago.
But now suddenly, we're all on the same
line.
All I'm saying all this for is so
you out there, honest conservatives, honest liberals can
see that the paradigm is always lying to
you.
And it says, now its boss controls Damascus.
It's boss
of Hayat al Sham
terrorist organization. The state department still has a
$10,000,000
bounty on this guy's head right now.
Right now.
And they're letting him take power over there.
They well, the reality is they made they
drove this to reality, but the public narrative
is, it's okay.
That jihadist terrorist that we have a bounty
on
is better than Assad,
Which is not true, obviously. But the point
is, how does that logically, legally,
rules based order? How does that make sense
to anybody? You should be laughing about how
transparently they're showing their hand.
Israel and the United States have now made
it very clear. They work with Al Qaeda.
Ver I bet you it's gonna be very
quick before we start seeing them working publicly
with Al Qaeda.
Which by the way, has already been floated
by US senators in the past.
Because Israel was driving that. Let's be clear
about that.
Now it says, although it's not clear to
everyone now that he is Washington's and Israel's
man in Damascus. That's who he is. NATO
countries have learned nothing from the decades of
blowback terrorism that has come from disastrous regime
change wars and arming fanatical extremist groups in
the region. Now I would argue they have.
They're doing it on purpose.
Either way, now with a fragile coalition led
by terrorist organization, Hyatt Sheryl Shom, controlling Damascus,
Arguably, it's only a matter of time before
another episode of Blowback,
which, of course, they can blame on just,
you know, reaction that we didn't plan for,
but I think this is by design.
Here's what he said.
Has been done then. The Assad rule in
Syria is over, a rule that for decades
has at least guaranteed the rights of minorities
like Christians. Certainly, there'll be no guarantees for
Christians this Christmas in Syria despite all the
huge amounts of celebration
in media newsrooms in NATO countries. After all
Ukraine was helping the fight along with Al
Qaeda.
Well, Ukraine had Neo Nazis.
Ukraine can support Al Qaeda. What's the difference?
You know, and that's a point not to
forget, by the way.
I I shouldn't need I mean, obviously, the
evidence is clear, but for those that may
still somehow be on the fence, we're get
we're gonna get in next segment to show
you how the decades of evidence that they
have been not just supporting, but funding, arming,
creating these groups. The US government, Israel. But
recognize how many other examples we have. How
many times we've seen ISIS patches on people
working
in the Azov movement in Israel, in Ukraine,
being funded by the US and Israel. Or
ISIS patches on people working with Turkey. I
mean, over and over and over. And yet
we still some people still just have to
act like we just can't. Because I think
some people just can't acknowledge this because it
shatters everything they think they know. That's cognitive
dissonance right there, and I think that's a
huge part of this.
Chaos is being sown. That is the policy
of the United States.
And,
Israel, very quick after the fall of Assad
to say it was them that did it.
The genocide in Gaza,
the, destruction of a Lebanese resistance. That's what
made the end of Assad
possible.
And, of course, we know Jake Sullivan famously
said Al Qaeda is on our side in
Syria. Is Al Qaeda on our side in
Syria now? Because the Twitter account for the
US embassy in Syria still says there's a
$10,000,000 bounty on Jalani's head. Will the CIA
kill Jalani, the head of HTS Al Qaeda?
Pictures of whom are emerging on social media
as the victor
of Syria?
We don't know yet, do we? We know
that Russia's 2 bases aren't gonna be safe
as long as Al Qaeda is continuing
to, its presence
in huge swathes of Syria and in the
capital in Damascus.
China, how safe is that? What would the
Chinese Al Qaeda elements
returning perhaps to China?
We know the blowback usually occurs mainly though
into Western Europe and the United States.
So ahead of a Trump administration,
this will sow more chaos as perhaps there
will be more terror in NATO countries now.
We, have to assume that there will be
a renewed real resistance,
real rebels to any CIA, MI 6, Mossad,
operation
in Damascus.
It was quick. It was, much quicker
than many believed,
but then a deal was done. What happens
now when
CIA backed Kurdish
elements
attack Turkey from the north?
There's a lot of weaponry there. No one
seems to ask in NATO propaganda media so
keen to give soft power interviews, soft interviews
to Jelani on Warner Brothers CNN the other
day. No one thinks to ask
what they have created.
What was created when these same media organizations
were applauding the Mujahideen
in Afghanistan.
What happened there? We know what happened. There
will be great dangers ahead, more chaos, so
and this
so there are elements in the US secret
state belief will only benefit the United States
given the coalescing of BRICS countries together,
trying to fight, in effect, US hegemonic power.
So
we'll have to now see in the days
ahead what atrocities precisely are going to be
committed.
Well done. Well reported.
You know, it's it's just crazy how much
blatantly provable information, like, he just went over
casually,
is so easy to demonstrate with receipts and
everything, and yet it just never breaks through
the controlled conversation, whether mainstream alternative media or
mainstream media.
So Patrick Henningston pointed this out back on
the 4th, I believe. This first one, and
then the 6th, he followed up on this.
Just remember that he and he was spot
on, and I it's it's just amazing how
they just go through the same motions.
He said, Syria chemical false flag alert. Remember?
He was pointing this out on 4th,
saying that their white helmets are back all
of a sudden, and they're planning it's it's
what they are there for.
They're they're they're extension of the same elements.
By the way, the white helmet facade is
just an extension of the exact groups of
the Al Qaeda, Haifa, Al Sham extension.
Vanessa and I have covered many times, and
she's been covered longer than anybody.
And he points out that on the 6th,
ex as exactly as he predicted,
acting as Al Qaeda's air force, Israel's IDF
has just fabricated a fake case of chemical
weapons, an excuse to bomb Syrian military facilities.
Guess who's reporting it that he's tagging? Little
old Elon Levy jumps in and says the
IDF attacked the chemical weapon stockpile in Syria,
which by the way, I argue I think
is is not even existing, quite frankly, but
it certainly could still be there. What the
fact that Assad has used them is a
verifiable this it's it's a falsehood.
Every single time we've shown this, every single
one of them have been shown to be
false. Whether they could or have them, certainly
possible.
But I think historically, it's actually been shown
to me more than once that they're actually
demonstrated how they destroyed their stockpile whereas the
US has clearly not.
Or Israel for that matter who are currently
using white phosphorus and all sorts of other
things on innocent civilians all over the world.
But he says the idea of attack the
stockpile in Syria to prevent it from falling
into the hands of the rebels.
So I don't know if this guy is
just this stupid or he or or he
he just plays a certain role, or he's
not even in in conjunction with the Israeli
government. You realize how dumb it is to
say, we we we wanted to bomb this
to stop it from going into the hands
of the people that Israel is right now
telling you they're working with.
That's how dumb this is. Right now, Israel
is working in conjunction with this group.
So how do you make sense of that?
Are they these dangerous chemical weapons using terrorists
that we have to stop from? Or are
they your ally who helped to get rid
of the evil Assad regime? They can't be
both. Or that means you're working with the
worst people alive because which, by the way,
is really what we're talking about. As on
top of the fact that Assad is not
what they claim.
But that's the report. IDF attack, chemical weapons
stockpile because it's just it's an easy win.
They can pretend it happened. People on news
will go look at what they did. They're
fighting for freedom. And it probably never even
happened. Probably wasn't even a bomb. I mean,
that's that's how lazy this gets. But what's
funny is how bad they are at thinking
3 steps ahead.
I'll show you. We'll get into it next.
We're in the next couple of segments where
Netanyahu is telling you how they're working. The
right now that they're taking credit for overthrowing
Syria.
Again, I think it's if I need to
pick, it's probably because Elon Levy is just
this bad at what he's doing.
Now,
Ewan McKinnon
says as we speak, this is on 6th,
but still the same point,
the west is collapsing Ukraine,
backing Israeli genocide, all in on Al Qaeda,
ISIS, and Syria, trying to start civil war
in Georgia, the country,
engaged in a coup in Romania.
Or as well as 45 other places we
could point out, but this is the good
guys. These are the good guys fighting for
freedom as they destroy freedom everywhere they go.
Caitlin Johnstone, and this is all I'll points
out later as well. I just love this
exactly what I was saying yesterday.
This really stands out to me. She says
crazy how the west
went directly from we need to occupy Afghanistan
for 2 decades to prevent it from being
taken over by the Taliban
to, yay, Syria is being taken over by
Al Qaeda.
Hold on. Where's the logic here? You're willing
to
destroy countries around the world for decades under
the war of terror
for the sole reason that we can't let
these powers take control.
And now you literally just let those same
powers take control because you don't like Assad.
The the the moral of the story is
these people have been lying to your entire
lives. They've been using the threat of things
they created to keep control over your life,
to keep you in fear, and to push
interest for a foreign country.
That's it. That's the main story.
And it's that obvious right now. The rest
of this we're gonna get into is gonna
show you how very clear it is. Not
only historically that they support and built these
groups, but that right now, they're pulling the
mask off. Honestly, I could give you I
could guess at why, but I don't know
why.
I think it's just because they're in the
interest of trying to change the narrative so
dramatically because they're losing.
You know, you could I I you you
may not even argue in a kinetic way,
but in a narrative conversation,
in public in the the field of public
opinion, they have lost already. It's over.
My point is that I also think they're
actually losing when it comes to the engagement.
The point is that the governments of the
powerful governments of the world on their side
don't care. The western apparatus media
are either that bad at this or just
willing to lie to you. I think it's
both in many ways.
But here we are.
Now, this is an article that I actually
covered yesterday, which I actually think this is
so wild.
So this article came out yesterday.
A completely different title.
Same link, by the way.
You can even see right there. Sir Assad,
Sweta, Dara Hom.
So in what world is the court is
the media, a supposed journalist, you know, journalistic
integrity and all that, allowed to post an
article with a title,
and then change the title, add new information
the next day. So you can post the
link, you can share it, and suddenly, the
thing popping up on the Twitter metadata has
a title a different title. Doesn't even make
sense what you posted.
Now, that's that's irritating. My point is, from
a journalistic integrity point,
that's not how this is supposed to work.
Now, they have a weird little caveat where
they do, like, live update blog things that
just up the title just changes and it
rolls up. That's not what this is. This
is a static article that they just changed.
And all you get
is updated on this day. And it's not
updated. You literally changed the article. Now there
is some overlap. There's points in there that
are made in the other, but the the
titles changed. Because it wasn't Siri government fell.
Yesterday, it was about different places that were
taken. We don't know what's happening. Just wanna
point it out.
This this we're in a world now where
there there are there's no like, it used
to be where you had a record. You
know, things were and they lied and cheated
and people stole documents. The point is now,
digital world we're getting into, it's scary to
me how rapidly they can just change what
actually happened.
I think that's pretty crazy.
Now, the point
this is what it said yesterday.
Insurgent stunning march across Syria gained speed on
Saturday,
which just makes me sick because they know
damn well. I mean, the it wasn't secret
what the group was. In this article, they
mentioned Al Qaeda and Haifa al Sham. They
know exactly who they are.
Insurgents?
So suddenly they're not terrorists that you guys
have been screaming at us? Like, real literally,
there are people that went to prison
for being
for the argument being that they were trying
to work with this group. And in fact,
in the past, there was one that was
just a journalist that they claimed was try
now it's a group that the US government
supports, and you put people in prison for
trying to cover what they were doing. I
mean, you just can't make this up. These
people are villains.
And and the ridiculous editor and journalist that
lie about these I mean, you know it.
You can look at your own reporting
where you called them terrorists. Now they're insurgents
just because they told you to. You're a
coward. The point is this stunning march across
Syria as they're trying to make this out
to be some kind of revolutionary thing. And
that's the point is they say, and I
made this point yesterday before this actually happened,
that they're saying the UN special envoy for
Syria was calling for an orderly transition. Before
we have we don't even but all so
we already oh, god. I can't talk. All
we were seeing
was
engagement.
Yes. They had taken some locations, but it
was not even remotely clear yet that they
had been that they would, like, take in
power and that there was gonna be a
new leader.
So why in the world would the UN,
at the beginning of yesterday, make the argument
that we want a political orderly transition?
Because that was the plan.
That was where this was going. I think
that only came into play when when it
became clear that they were gonna cheat on
whatever deal they made and Israel was gonna
push into the country. And he can so
at some level, there's higher this is where
you get into the globalism idea. There are
very clear elements of this that are bigger
than just one country.
But here's what it says today,
some of the updates. Now it says the
Syrian government fell
after a sudden rebel offensive, rebel offensive. You
won't hear the word terrorist mentioned once in
here.
Sprinted across government held territory and entered the
capital in 10 days.
Syrian state television aired a video statement by
a group of men saying that president Assad
had been overthrown and all the teenies in
jails have been set free.
So that should be terrifying.
People that wanna pretend that he's a evil
villain and the only people ever arrested were
political prisoners because you just wanna lie to
yourself about that despite all the evidence to
the contrary, probably will go, yay. We freed
them all. The reality is these were horrifying
people by and large, as Vanessa would tell
you. These are people they arrested that were
working for Israel in the United States and
terrorist groups that were trying to overthrow their
country for 13 years.
Now they walked in, set them all free.
Now just realize what that means for the
average people that are gonna get raped and
tortured and beat and stolen from by the
people that they let out.
Now says the man and, by the way,
the people that are there because they were
let in as well, but I'm just saying
they just let out people that were probably
a bunch of terrorists.
The man who read the statement said the
operations room to conquer Damascus and opera opposition
group called on all opposition fighters and citizens
to preserve state institutions
of the free state of Syria,
which is not what's happening. So these are
flowery things they say out loud so the
AP can say them and make them look
like they're fighting for freedom. Right now, they're
destroying buildings and bombing
innocent people and built to burning churches.
It's very clearly being documented. It's not it's
not hard to see. And by the way,
it's exactly consistent with what they've done in
their entire existence.
The statement emerged hours after the head of
Syria opposition, War Monitor, said
Assad had left the country for an undisclosed
location. Now remember, I said yesterday
they're reporting this yesterday that he fled the
country. Now I don't know whether that had
happened yesterday or whether that was what they
were saying, and then he eventually left late
yesterday to go to Moscow. It could've been
before that. The point is that historically, they
have lied about that I mean, and not
just Assad.
We've seen that so many times where they
they push that line in order in hopes
that it helps collapse the the spirit to
resist.
In this case, it does turn out that
he went to Moscow. And it says Syrian
prime minister,
Jalali
said that the government was ready to extend
its hand to the opposition. Think about that.
And turn its functions over to a transitional
government.
So my opinion, that guy is not on
the side of Syria.
This is somebody who is now leaning into
the terrorist run Israeli US backed regime change
effort and wants to hand over power to
that,
a transitional government. That's not this is not
some transition of power to peacefully. Right now,
because Israel and the rest of them are
currently bombing and killing civilians, we should recognize
it's not about the interest of freeing severe
of Syrians.
So it makes you wonder whether this guy
was the central role in trying to destroy
what happened.
A daylight as daylight broke over Damascus today,
crowds gathered to pray in the city's mosques
and to celebrate the squares chanting, god is
great. People also chanted anti Israel slogans and
honk horns. Of
course, weirdly, they omit the part where you
can see
many more people cheering for or rather cheering
against what currently happened,
which again, it's not I I have no
way of knowing what is the majority.
Personally, and I think it's obvious that people
are very, very supportive of Assad, and I'm
gonna get to it later in this article.
It shows you how many of them were
fleeing dramatically
because they knew what was coming. So it
shows you that the majority clearly or or
maybe that the majority fled because they knew
they would get killed. There's only a small
faction of people there going, yay. Either way,
I don't know for sure. My point though
is that you can prove that there are
large groups of people chanting that, you know,
sub a gift
showing resistance to what's happening.
So why didn't they mention that? Why didn't
they add another paragraph when they go, and,
alternatively, there are people that are cheering. I
think you know why.
Just important to always point out that e
AP or any of the rest, like, this
is willful willful disregard for things. This is
not journalism.
And it says the rebels, again, that in
and of itself should show you that, had
already seized the cities of Aleppo and Hama,
as well as large parts of the south
in a lightning offensive that began on November
27th. Analysis analysts said rebel control of Palms
would be a game changer. Now see, I
don't believe this what we're seeing has started
on I think what we saw was the
psychological operation that began this, and then we
saw that shift however many days later. The
rebels rebels moves into Damascus came after the
Syrian army withdrew from much of the southern
part of the country, leaving more areas including
several provincial capitals under the control of opposite
fighters.
The advances in the past week and one
of the thing to add too is that
what Vanessa and I think what,
Isabella was saying as well is that not
only did they pull back their forces, but
they met the the agenda was to get
the civilians to safety, Which is why it
seems that there was very little engagement in
the first action there. But, ultimately, the rest
of Syria is still there. And so I
so the argument would have been in the
deal
that it would have been able to remove
them from the place that they were focusing
on and give them some safe area. Then,
of course, they broke that. Now they're just
going after everything.
So you could argue that he was also
aiming for the intention of trying to keep
his civilians safe, which is what he's done
many times in the past, including creating corridors
for even the terrorists to get out. That
was the last big focus on Syria that,
you know, however many years ago.
That was one of the things they really
were hoping people didn't see, that he opened
up these corridors and said, look. If you
guys wanna get out of the area, stop
fighting us. You can take this corridor and
go out. The the very people that were
being paid by the US Israel to fight
against him.
And just there's so many examples throughout history
that show he is not what they claimed
he was.
So the advances in the past week were
by far the largest in recent years by
opposition factions led by a group that has
its origins in Al Qaeda,
That's even trying to play that game. And
it's considered a terrorist group by the US
and the UN and the United Nations, period.
Yeah. That's the end of the sentence.
Currently considered a terrorist organization, but they're okay
with them taking power of a country.
Just let's laugh at how dumb that is.
The UN special envoy for Syria
called Saturday for urgent talks in Geneva to
ensure an orderly political transition. So there's that
same point.
Now in a new article from today as
if it wasn't said yesterday before this actually
started, that's important, In Damascus, people rushed in
stock rushed to stock up on supplies.
1,000 went to Syrian's border with Lebanon trying
to leave the country. Lebanese border officials closed
the main border crossing on Saturday, leaving many
stuck. The point is that it's hard to
argue that everyone's at the port of what's
happening when you can see 1,000 trying to
rush to flee the country. On top of
that, that I clearly think the evidence shows
that most Syrians are not okay with what's
going on.
I mean, are we really gonna pretend that
on the record that Israel is any friend
to Syrians?
It's objectively not the case.
So maybe you could think he changed his
mind and now we but in in the
mind of Syrians and you can look there
in the times where this wasn't the big
focus, right, where there was a lull in
the main focus on what's going on in
Syria. There's all sorts of conversations and think
tanks and and, you know, people posting on
Twitter telling you what they think.
It's funny how when we get to the
moment of this kind of, you know, pinnacle
of this of the of the where the
the fever pitch is there.
Where we seem to lean into all of
the hyperbolic screaming and
or people do anyway. That's too bad. Because
we're talking about human lives here. We're talking
about people's communities,
their livelihood, their generational, you know, and and
just gets wiped away because we wanna fight
over who's
know, it just it just kills me. It's
just the same thing over and over. So
what's going on in Palestine right now? Now
it says the Donald Trump on Saturday posted
a social on social media that the United
States should avoid engaging in we'll talk about
a lot of this stuff going forward. I
mean, just how embarrassing that is. Literally occupying
Syria and we're like, we don't wanna be
involved in any of this.
Well, by the way, a group that you
that he was involved in funding as well.
So either again, he knows that and is
being very dishonest or he doesn't. That's even
more alarming to me. Separately, Joe Biden
said the opposite because they're a different size.
No. Said the same thing. Joe Biden and
Trump are both calling for the same thing.
Because that should mean it. I mean, the
obvious point is always there. When it comes
to the main agendas, they're always in the
same position, guys. And I just think that's
obvious as ever.
Peterson said a a date, set a date
for talks with Geneva
or in Geneva on the implementation of the
UN resolution
adopted in 2015, and calling for a Syrian
led political process would be a would be
announced later.
The resolution calls for the establishment of a
transnational governing body, followed by the drafting of
a new constitution and ending with UN supervised
elections.
So can you can you guess where this
is going?
So think about how dumb this is. So
we're at a point now where Israel,
who is driving towards the the transitional government
action and the and the elections and all
of this,
are working with Hamas. Right?
Are is that the case? Are they working
with Hamas right now to to to get
this to happen? Didn't they just got didn't
they just spend a year telling us the
UN was Hamas? And now, oh, but not
this one though. Not this UN or or
this part of it or when they working
on our side rather.
The 2015,
resolution that we like because we're gonna use
it right now, that's good. But any other
resolution we've ever disliked doesn't matter because you're
a Hamas, though, in that context. Over here,
it's not because we like you.
I mean, this should be the way we
regard this. This is comically stupid. You do
not pretend like an entire body is a
terrorist organization
over here, and then 30 seconds later pretend
like you're willing to work with them because
you like what's happening.
You can, obviously. You can do whatever you
want. The point is the rest of the
world just stand up and go, well, that's
crazy. You're a monster. You're a liar. You're
dishonest. You're killing people. Because we all know
what's happening. So this is crazy that they're
now going through the body of the United
Nations to to drive in a transnational
an illusion that will solidify their control over
Syria, or rather the parts they break up
and take for themselves.
Just silly. It's just embarrassing.
It's even more so embarrassing that people pretending
to be pundits that have, you know,
partisan insight are lying to you about what's
going on or don't know.
Now last part of this,
it says the in recent years, Hayat al
Sham's leader, Gulani,
has sought to make remake the group's image,
they say.
Cutting ties with Al Qaeda, not true. Ditching
hard line officials, not true. And vowing to
embrace pure pluralism and religious tolerance.
Wow. I mean, guys, this is just the
dumbest thing in the world. Like, obviously, anybody
can change. But But you're talking about somebody
who you presented as the hard line extremist,
like,
the definition
of what we're fighting in extremist, Islamist, made
and now he wants religious tolerance?
Pluralism?
I mean, this you know what this is?
This is the woke Isis
in the same direction as the vanilla Isis.
This is the same agenda. It's always been
the case to blur the lines here, because,
ultimately, this is about using whatever they can.
But it's embarrassing
to pretend like these groups are suddenly not
exactly what they currently are still doing. You
realize right now, they are not doing that.
Right this moment, they're burning down churches.
But
AP reported this. You know, it's about the
equivalent of Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens bringing
on
Tate to say things we can literally show
him on video
proving the opposite. It's what they're doing. They
are whitewashing
the reputation
of this group for future agendas. Now, whether
Tucker and Candace knew that is irrelevant for
the point now. The reality is the guy
is a monster. He is very objectively telling
you what he's done to these people and
then goes on there and gives you a
fake narrative, and they all nod their head
and go, oh, yeah. They're coming after you.
Here we are. That's the equivalent of this
group. This group is a monster organization that
has been put together by these states and
are now being whitewashed by the media apparatus.
It says the Syrian government has referred to
opposition gunmen as terrorists since the conflict broke
out in 2011 because they are.
Now Dan Cohen says there is no Syrian
revolution. There is a CIA run counterrevolution.
They sound similar, but they are complete opposites.
Syria has lost its sovereignty to competing gangs
of Turkish and Israeli backed Jihadist mercenaries who
are united in their hate for religious minorities.
That's the truth.
Can you imagine trying to frame one of
the most alarming groups as somehow the ones
fighting for religious freedom? I mean, that's as
dumb as this. That's as stupid as saying
Zionism is fighting for anything other than the
destruction of everything else.
A dark day for humanity, it says.
Caitlin Johnstone writes, sure as the US has
been strangling Syria for years with crushing sanctions
and stealing its oil with the stated goal
of preventing its reconstruction after a US backed
civil war. And, sure, the US has been
funding constant Israeli air strikes on Syria while
overextending Syria's crucial allies with proxy wars in
other countries. And sure, that's just the stuff
we know about so far. But don't you
dare call this a US backed regime change
because that's denying the agency of the Syrian
people, US Honest.
The point she's making is obvious. They have
been pulling out every possible stop to destroy
every piece of Syria and then stand back
and go, we don't want anything to do
with this.
I just think it's embarrassing that they think
I mean, I I guess this is the
same thing I'm saying in the rest of
them.
They know we see through it. What else
they gonna do?
They're committed.
There's no genocide. What what they they don't
what else they gonna do? Not gonna say,
oh, you got me. You got me. We
killed them. They're not gonna do that. So
I just think it's important to recognize how
flimsy this is, and the only thing holding
this together is literally with shoestrings and bubble
gum. This thing is about to fall apart.
We need to push back on the partisan
control.
These people out there that are keeping our
interest in this broken system, That's why this
continues. You may think that's us like, if
you think that's crazy to relate this larger
global dynamic to these small I mean, from
an American perspective
I mean, look at it like this. We're
talking about the US government's central role in
what we're talking about.
They are, at least in some way, influenced
by what we do in this country. So
if we could break through the the basically,
the last things
barely holding this control together,
we can push back on that control and
then eventually put the the interest of the
US supporting Israel would stop, which would then
stop their ability to keep fighting because it's
a domino effect.
We see it.
Do something about it.
For crying out loud. If you're listening right
now, do something about it.
Caitlin Johnstone says, looks like Assad is on
his way out,
likely to be replaced by a US puppet
regime who will cut off supplies to Hezbollah
in Lebanon. The empire notch is another win.
Now realize, that's already happening. They're already telling
you they're working with Israel, it's and we'll
get to it. The US proxy warfare in
Lebanon and Ukraine makes a lot more strategic
sense now. Many pundits on the on my
end of the commentary spectrum have been calling
those proxy wars self defeating and framing them
as the desperate flailings of a dying empire,
which will only accelerate its demise. Now I
do think that's part of it. But she
goes, but now, here we are watching the
empire score a victory. It's been chasing for
years. With the Western Israeli stranglehold on the
Middle East growing ever tighter. Now, yes, I
guess.
Arguably, this is a victory because they've been
trying to accomplish this. But, I mean,
it's like the it's a point about overextension.
If if you're gonna argue that they gained
this, if they sacrificed everything else to get
it and then would lose it tomorrow, is
that still a victory?
I don't know if that's gonna happen. My
point though is I think we can objectively
show that they have lost control.
I mean, again, it's look, it's us watching
on this show, Mita, it's just not just
our opinion. Let's be clear about that. The
reality is undeniable that the world has stopped
falling for the lies of Zionism.
Too late.
As well, that's translated into the fact that
we can see the US government has blindly,
against everything being exposed, continue to support it.
That's too late. It's out. You can't pull
that back. So that is a loss of
at least in the public opinion and narrative.
Then you can show that they have been
flimsily following I mean, they have been failing
in things in Venezuela. I mean, they are
not effectively doing people are not falling for
it anymore.
But my point is they just keep going.
And, you know, you could just keep pounding
until eventually it breaks. Doesn't mean you're gonna,
you know I'm trying to make an analogy.
The point is they'll they can just keep
using force. They have a lot of money
they steal from you and a lot of
military equipment they've used your stolen funds to
get.
They can keep going.
Is that a success though? I mean, it's
a weird equivalence to, like, the billionaire dynamic
where you can just have enough money and
influence to keep failing until you succeed. Kinda
the same idea.
So my point is whether or not you
think that you know, I think both those
could exist in the same conversation. Yes. They
can be in these self defeating proxy wars
because they're losing influence and no one else
would do.
But they can you can also argue that
what they just accomplished is is a success,
at least momentarily.
We'll know more as this continues to flesh
out.
But I I'm airing more on the side
of the former that this was probably a
bad move for them. Now it says one
of the many perks of being the world's
dominant superpower is that it gives you the
luxury of time. If one regime change operation
fails, don't worry. You can just move on
to some move some chess pieces around, and
you could take another shot at it later.
How many times have we talked about this?
And it says, if a coup attempt fails
in Latin America, relax. There'll be other coup
attempts.
If your efforts to grab Syria fail,
you could just smash it with sanctions and
occupy its oil fields and impoverish it while
overextending its military allies and proxy conflicts everywhere
to grab it later.
Now that's ultimately what happened, but who knows
if that was the plan. It does make
sense. A good kicks a good kickboxer, she
writes, throws many combinations with the understanding that
most strikes would miss or be blocked or
cause minimal damage, trusting that eventually, the one
knockout blow will get through. No empire lasts
forever,
but there's no evidence that this one is
going any time in the immediate future. This
ugliness could conceivably drag itself out for generations.
Richard Medhurst pointing out, and we'll get to
this more in a second, about Netanyahu in
the Golan Heights right now claiming victory over
what just happened.
Richard points out, how was this a revolution
when Netanyahu is literally in the Golan Heights
taking credit for the fall of Damascus?
It's this is my point as usual about
the hubris of these people.
He needs to stand up and make it
look like he did this. Even though it
at least some level of the people buying
the other narrative.
Because that's these are weak people.
You have a lot of I'm not talking
about power,
but you're weak.
You need to project strength because you're weak.
That's how these and it's everywhere we look.
These these usually are some of the most
of course, this is my opinion. But look,
guys, you can see the way that they
act when it comes down to their reputation
or when they have to bomb and murder
people to make it look like they're in
control. That's weakness. Understand that.
People who find themselves in the same side
as Netanyahu should reflect seriously on what they
what it is exactly they think they know
about Syria.
Well said.
Now, Ken O'Keefe, as we get into this
next part, points out. Now again, these by
the way, this is now. These these are
the groups. This is outside a a Syrian
location.
And and these are the groups they want
you to think are the moderate elements. I
mean, guys, can we actually take a second
and laugh? I can't go ahead and say
it a moment ago.
Are we actually playing the game again of
the moderate game? Like, so we all know
the moderate rebels was a flimsy complete facade.
They got caught for it. They were forced
to admit what they really were.
Now we're playing moderate jihadist?
I get I mean, again, these are the
points that stand out to me as desperate.
Can you actually not think of something better?
Can you not think that we might go,
hold on, moderate rebel, moderate jihadist? Uh-oh. Maybe
they're lying again.
I just don't know why. It's it seems
like they're desperate, but I I that's I
know that's what I seem to say when
these you tell me what I'm missing.
Why wouldn't they take a half a second
more and go, let's think of a better
name. I don't know. Maybe that's the agenda
itself. But realize how dumb that is. We're
playing the same game over again. We they
got caught lying last time.
And here are your moderate jihadists.
So again, all these Republicans out there who
just got done telling us this is the
biggest threat in the world, why are you
supporting it in Syria? Oops.
That seems contradictory.
So Ken O'Keefe says the rebels, in quotes,
won't attack Israel.
Well, first, so this is what suppress news
is saying. So a lot of these I
think, you know,
there's accounts out there that have been more
so leaning into the Republican side of things,
and I think what happens is you kinda
lose yourself in some of these partisan narratives.
And so he's going, the Syrian rebels have
reached the border with Israel. The question is,
why stop? Why not attack Israel?
So to me, it's like, really? Like, how
do you not know what, you know, that
that's what I That's that's the point he's
making. They won't because they are armed and
funded by the Jewish state in America.
If you, by the way, if you're not
following Ken O'Keefe, I recommend you do. He
says they are proxy terrorists, equivalent to the
ones that killed Gaddafi and destroyed Libya. It's
the same playbook. So let's get into that.
1st, let's start with the US government side
of things, which by the way are very
overlapped and and intertwined.
But we're gonna show you some of the
US government examples, and we're gonna get into
some of what we showed yesterday, but it's
fleshed it out into the undeniable reality that
Israel has always been supporting this group and
all of them for that matter.
And, again, and you should not miss the
overlap, which that's exactly what happened with Hamas.
They have now been thoroughly exposed for literally
funding Hamas in order to keep him divided
right up to the very day this October
7th forward. So that this is what we're
dealing with. They have always armed the worst
elements of what they claim they're fighting. So
Matt Kennard points out, Hillary Clinton email in
in 2012 to the state department official with
the subject line, an interesting proposal.
How Israel could help get Assad out of
office?
Look at that.
And we've talked about all these.
How could Netanyahu topple Assad
and weaken Hezbollah in one fell swoop?
A far more strategic opportunity than a strike
on Iran?
Hand over the Golan Heights with one condition.
Look at that.
2012. You know who ultimately ended up giving
them golden heights?
The outsider fighting the deep state. Oops. Wait
a minute. You mean the guy that helped
the deep state take more control of Syria?
Yes. That guy. Donald trump gave them golden
heights.
It's just so easy to show how these
narratives are dumb or rather to be more
not more inconsistent or inaccurate.
But the point is in Hillary Clinton's email,
they're openly discussing the idea of exactly what
just happened. Not for the say for saving
the Syrian people or a revolution of rebels
fighting no. The manufacturing
of destruction for the interest of you at
the expense of Syria. It's exactly what's happening.
It's exactly what they talked about then. Is
this proposal says Netanyahu could topple Assad by
offering to give back to Golan Heights.
And it says the the article continues, Syria
breaks with Iran and Hezbollah will break the
supply line between Iran and Lebanon.
Hezbollah have always said this would be a
disaster for them. It says it goes on.
If a new Syrian government remember, this is
Clinton and them were saying, so this doesn't
necessarily all add up to the truth.
If a new Syrian government arises ready to
make peace, then Israel has helped to isolate
Hezbollah and broken the Syrian axis, Iran axis.
You know, this is where you could argue
that maybe from a US perspective that they
did think the deal was gonna happen.
As long as Assad's out of the way,
put someone we like in there, we can
we can reach that point. When we have
peace, which will destroy, but Israel didn't want
that. Israel has a different plan. Israel has
the plan for the greater Israel dynamic. That
means full occupation of Syria.
So that would make sense. Again, theorizing.
But the idea that you can see that
their past plans were to somehow make a
deal if possible, if not just get them
out of the way.
So they could have made that deal. Assad
says he resigns, wants a peaceful transition, and
then Israel blows in there and destroys everything.
Pretty common. It's what we've seen before.
Now it says,
Ephirim Haveli, the former head of the Israel's
Secret Intelligence Service,
Mossad, has rightly argued that toppling Mossad and
weakening Hezbollah is a far more important and
strategic opportunity today than a military strike on
Iran's nuclear facility.
It concludes, Hezbollah needs to be deconstructed if
there is ever to be a peace in
the Middle East.
Again, that's, you know, whatever that means to
them, meaning, really, their control over it. A
unique window may be opening up to isolate
it in Lebanon and then exert pressure from
a post Assad Syria to break it apart.
Never been about helping Syrian people. Israel can
help the process.
Now what's funny to me is I think
that's more I think they're well aware that
it's being driven by Israel. Either way, the
point
is
that here at to 2,012, don't forget,
you can see a very clear push to
to and this is what the reality is
today. Lebanon
is not necessarily
Hezbollah is in this fight. Lebanon and the
Lebanese forces are very it's a very there's
a lot of different opinions, but most of
what I respect argue that they're in a
far too influenced and and possibly controlled by
the US and Israel, which is ultimately why
Hezbollah became something
of power
supported by the people.
So at this point, you could argue that
this is what they're ultimately talking. Isolate Lebanon
and exert pressure, and ultimately, you can see
how we've seen this play out.
Now, Matt also points out a document from
Hillary Clinton state department emails.
Now, again, all of which you've seen, this
shouldn't be new to any of you, but
it's all in one place. It says, quote,
the best way to help Israel deal with
Iran's growing nuclear capability, which again, we know
is a fact today is not true. Even
the state department has admitted
this, is to help the people of Syria
overthrow the regime of Assad or rather just
manipulated for our interest. It is the strategic
relationship between Iran, the regime of Assad, and
Syria that makes it possible for Iran to
undermine Israel's security.
Oh, so it was all about Israel's interests.
Shouldn't be surprising to you.
Here's Aaron Mate pointing out the another email
that we referenced earlier in the article from
Jake Sullivan to Hillary Clinton,
where he says it looks like in quote,
our side in Syria, 1, meaning
Al Qaeda.
Let's all hope it doesn't go like that
the next time we won in Iraq or
like, it doesn't go like like we the
last time we won in Iraq or or
Syria or Libya. You know, destruction and murder.
Here's the here's the report from Jake from
Jake Sullivan to Hillary Clinton. This is a
WikiLeaks email. You can easily look this up.
And it says,
Al Qaeda is on our side in Syria.
Isn't this just embarrassing
that we live in this world where there's
entire people in, like, in the adult room
of the mainstream media and pundits out there
and partisan narratives that act like we're crazy
for even point that you can literally see
their emails that you can prove, have literal
documented email. Like, not Twitter files level,
but actual WikiLeaks documents that can prove the
source and show they said this.
And yet, we all get you know, you
get the point.
I mean, again, maybe I'm just screaming, preaching
to the choir. Maybe literally everybody sees this,
and we're kinda like every other story. We're
fighting against the government that doesn't care what
we think. Either way, it's important to reach
everybody else. Anybody out there that doesn't know
this stuff, get in front of them.
Time to stop playing games. Piers Morgan says,
as another regime change war, this time in
Syria,
a reminder that this has all been archived
via deception. Achieved, excuse me. I don't know
why I said that. Achieved via deception. With
Iraq, it was over WMDs,
which let's not forget, in case you don't
know, that was a lie. A
from top to bottom.
Thoroughly shown to not just be a lie,
but that they knew they were lying. That's
the important part. And again, if you think
that that's corporate media that's made those arguments
because it is the truth. But I think,
ultimately, that came out for the interest of
something else either way because that's I mean,
honestly, that's the only time I ever see
them truly give you some information that is
important
is if it is important to get you
somewhere else, which is what we're seeing in
the Trump administration right now in every possible
way.
But it says, in SOWMD,
they lied about. In Syria, the alleged chemical
weapons attacks played a key role.
And he goes And then it says, it's
set in stone at the point of 911.
Now, here's what this document says, and this
is from the state department,
Syria and Iran. If toppling Saddam is a
prime objective,
it is far easier to do it with
Syria and Iran in favor or acquiescing rather
than hitting all 3 at once. I I
favor giving these 2 a chance at a
different relationship.
Help and You know, the point is what
he's making is this is all coordinated.
With the interest to go after all of
them, but play them against each other,
this is not what the good guy does.
Right? You have to realize, as far back
as you wanna look, they've been playing these
games. That doesn't mean that every one of
these countries are
acting of the interest of the world or
that they were good guys necessarily,
but they still made a clear point to
undermine their sovereignty, not because they thought they
were doing bad things, but because they wanted
something. Because they wanted what they wanted at
the expense of everybody else. That's who we
have in power.
Here is a clip from Kerry, John Kerry.
Many of these I mean, I these are
all common for people in this field. You
guys all know this stuff where he's telling
you what we're talking about.
Well, the problem is the Russians don't care
about international law. We do. Mhmm.
And
we don't have the basis
our lawyers tell it. By the way, we
laugh at that. I'm never gonna argue that
any government truly cares about the law. But
to watch Russia
very routinely follow the international law in all
sorts of ways, and then watch the US
government today just explain
why they don't need to or why Israel
is not accountable. They literally destroyed any semblance
of a rules based order nair narrative. There
it's gone. Same thing I said in the
beginning. What's different is Israel reflects the international
law and Hamas is not. Well, Hamas has
continually shown that they do from an organization
standpoint post October 7th. Maybe that's because it's
in their agenda to do so, their interest.
Not I'm not talking about individual actions. They
were laws broken on October 7th.
But since that point forward,
they've held pretty much everything.
And maybe that's just because it suits their
interest. But regardless, Israel has not, and they
keep lying about it. So going back to
the point of Kerry going, that's always the
old narrative. We international law, we're that good
guy, and they're the bad guy.
Unless we have a UN Security Council resolution
or unless
we are under attack
or unless we are invited in.
Russia is invited in
by the legitimate regime. Well, it's illegitimate
normally, but by the regime.
And so
they were invited in, and we're not invited
anymore. The only reason they're letting us fly
is because
we're going after Assad.
We were going after Assad, those air defenses.
We have to take out all the air
defenses,
and we don't have a legal justification,
frankly, for doing that unless we stretch it
way beyond the law.
And a lot of Americans don't believe that
we should be fighting and sending young Americans
over to die in another country. That's the
problem.
Congress won't vote to do it.
I think we've been putting an extraordinary amount
of our
debt. I'm late.
Yeah. And I have to say, as you
said, it's a double edged sword. When you
pump more weapons into a situation like Syria,
it doesn't end well for Syrians.
Oops.
That's what they're doing.
Dumping arms into terrorist groups in order to
achieve their end.
The groups the the armed groups in Syria
get a lot of support.
I realize this is the moderate rebel element.
It's not up for debate. Even they were
forced to acknowledge they were unsavory characters. Right?
And that's what Hayat al Sharf. That's what
these groups are. So what they're saying is
they funded the terrorist organizations. We all know
that now, as if we're being honest with
ourselves. Not just from the United States, but
from other partners. Qatar, Turkey Saudi Arabia. Saudi
Arabia.
Huge amount of weapons coming in. Huge amount
of money. The reason Russia came in
is because
That's the main point. Now he he he's
mentioning that they're oh, right here. The reason
they came in. Is getting stronger.
Dashwood Right. So the reason Russia came in
is because isil was getting stronger. Do you
know why? As I've said before, this aspect
of our strategy
was moving too slowly,
but the fall of Ramadi has galvanized the
Iraqi government.
So with the additional steps I ordered last
month, we're speeding up training of ISAL forces,
including volunteers from Sunni tribes in Anbar prop
Yeah. Because they've always been supporting them.
And yet here we another example of Russia
coming in to stop you guys from funding
terrorism or funding Nazis. Now here's WikiLeaks, the
one pointing it out.
Here's WikiLeaks as well, pointing out a a
good article actually,
from Substack, and it says, what's next for
Syria? A well sourced underreported review of Israeli
government support for anti Assad forces.
When it comes to the Syrian civil war,
the conflict which sparked the major refugee crisis
responsible for flooding Europe and the millions of
Muslims, Israel has been firmly on the side
of jihad, even and most particularly Al Qaeda.
Now it's not a civil war. I'll take
issue with that, but let's check this out.
December 7th from Keith Woods. It says, when
it comes to the Syrian civil war, which
is what I just read, but that's the
the point is Israel has been firmly supporting
terrorist groups,
particularly Al Qaeda.
Now the point it makes here
is that it's responsible
the conflict which sparked the major refugee crisis,
responsible for flooding Europe with millions of Muslims.
So you have to remember that this has
been an Israeli agenda. That's what we're this
should be transparent at this point. So don't
forget that part of their agenda was to
weaponize migration for the interest of their whether
it's their prophetic beliefs or because of the
destabilization of countries, including Europe and the United
States, which is what has ultimately happened. And
right now, you've got Republicans and people around
the world on the same agenda screaming about
how it's because of bad guys from other
countries when you would see where this is
coming from. Largely, people being taken advantage of.
Instead of blaming the governments doing it, you're
blaming the individual suffering because of it.
Now it says in 2019, an outgoing Israeli
army commander, Gadi Eisenkod, confirmed suspicions that as
well as medical aid, Israel had been providing
lethal material support for Syrian jihadists. Eisenkod and,
oh, there's links in all of this, but
we're gonna get to some more visual examples
in a minute.
Eisenkod said that Israel had been years providing
arm light arms
and weapons and rev 2 rebel groups along
the Syrian Israeli border.
Now he also acknowledged that we carried out,
quote, we carried out thousands of attacks in
recent years without taking responsibility and without taking
credit, which we actually know. Israel Israeli support
for these groups actually went well beyond the
light of arms, Eisenkod acknowledged. In 2018,
Foreign Policy Magazine reported that Israel had funded,
quote, at least 12 rebel groups in north
and southern Syria. These are the worst of
the worst. Based on reports from, quote, more
than 2 dozen commanders and rank and file
members of these groups, the transfers included
assault rifles, machine guns, mortar launchers, transport vehicles,
Israeli insert and security agencies delivered the weapons
through 3 gates connecting the Israeli occupied Golan
Heights to Syria. Oh, and look at that.
Now we find out one of them wait.
And it's not just that, it's the water
and the resources and the the strategic positioning.
But it's there's a reason this was taken.
It's at the Golan Heights, which is a
Syrian territory location. It says the same crossings
Israel used to deliver humanitarian aid to residents
in southern Syria suffering from years of civil
war. Not true. That's foreign policy writing that.
I mean, it it's it's you can talk
to the Druze population in these locations, they
are rabidly anti Israel. We saw that, by
the way, when they tried to lie about
how a bomb had landed and killed children,
which it turned out was their iron dome
that killed them, which by the way has
happened before
and covered even by their own media. And
when Netanyahu tried to go there, it looked
like he was the man of pea they
literally kicked him out.
Barely covered by corporate media, but we covered
it on the show. It says Israel also
provided salaries to rebel fighters, which, right to
this day, they're doing.
Paying each one about $75
a month
and supplied additional money to the groups used
to buy arms on the Syrian black market.
So, again, thinking about dumping money in the
hands of of Hamas,
1,000,000,000 of dollars back in 2000 you know,
before I think, like,
when was when would that have been?
Post 2006, I think was the time frame
we're talking about when they reportedly
the former head of Shin Bet and former
prime minister made that clear.
Oh, my point was that so we're talking
about
what they use it for.
There's there's and specifically in Israel or occupied
Palestine, there is no way to that's why
they ship aid in. So when they're giving
them this money, the subpretend is for humanitarian
aid, which is what they always love to
claim. It's for weapons.
On top of that, as I understand that
the money they're giving these people today is
far more than that.
They are supporting the rebels in Syria, it
says. It's very clear. Because whenever we we
make advances in some places, this is coming
from people in Syria,
they make an attack in order to undermine
the army.
It it's very clear. That's why some in
Syria joke. How can you say that Al
Qaeda doesn't have an air force? They have
the Israeli air force.
Also, in 2015, the Pentagon acknowledged that the,
quote, moderate rebels who were being armed and
trained by the United States and its allies
were passing their equipment to Nussefrafront.
Now realize even the so called modern rebels
were also terrorist organizations, but the Nussefrafront, which
is what ultimately became they tried to pretend
they broke off, but it became Hayat Jerald
Sham,
is,
like, the because they they even what they
would frame as, like, the worst element out
there.
Although the US publicly claimed it did not
intentionally support Islamist like Al Qaeda and ISIS
in Syria despite
funding army and creating these elements, leaked internal
documents have repeatedly shown that US officials were
aware that these groups dominated the Syrian opposition
and were often the chief beneficiaries of the
raid. So right there, guy, and this is
the stuff we're showing you. They love to
lie about how we didn't know if it
comes to what they didn't know. But, ultimately,
they did know, and they were arming these
people deliberately.
For example, a declassified 2,012 mem memorandum
from the Defense Intelligence Agency, the DIA, who
don't forget
is
the surveillance they use comes because of the
NRO, which is currently in agreement with Elon
Musk and Starlink
or SpaceX
to put satellites in the air, which will
completely create a surveillance web that you cannot
hide from according to the quote of NRL.
Just a side note. The point being these
DIA and NSA, there's always these groups. We
have this the point is there's a group
that is being supplying is supplying them with
surveillance apparatus. That's what Elon Musk is working
to build. Important to point out. But, anyway,
the DIA
revealed that from the beginning of the Syrian
war, the US believed that the Salafists, the
Muslim Brotherhood, and Al Qaeda are the major
driving forces in insurgency in Syria.
That's a quote from a 2012 memorandum from
a declassified US document.
But we're still gonna pretend we're we don't
know. So much evidence. It's amazing how we're
in these positions. The more the longer I
do this, year after year, I continue to
I'm just so blown away.
And that's why I get more to the
point of how it's like, this is not
about just showing people the truth. There's something
else going on. It's just there's there's so
much evidence that's so constantly there that just
nobody points to.
Or, you know, a lot of people ignore
is the right way to put that.
Now it says, Al Qaeda being a reference
to Al Qaeda in Iraq, or rather AQI
is what it says. And that's specifically Al
Qaeda in Iraq, which later evolves into ISIS.
Now it says WikiLeaks revealed that current US
national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, told Hillary Clinton
that they're on our side, which we already
showed you. Al Qaeda is on our side
in Syria. When ISIS did emerge, many voices
within Israel saw it as a positive. Never
forget, Jake Sullivan is right now in a
position.
So he knows this and is lying to
you like all the rest of them. A
2016
paper by an Israeli strategic think tank that
contracts for NATO and the Israeli government
argued against
destroying the Islamic state
in
2016. That's Trump's administration. And as I said,
since the, quote, continuing existence of ISIS serves
a strategic purpose,
Rather, the Islamic state, they say, but the
same point. And could be, quote, a useful
tool,
Israel writes,
in undermining
Israel's enemies of Hezbollah, Iran, Syria, and Russia.
Or yeah. Rather, Israeli's think tank, the road.
The point and the less is the same.
They're talking about in secret discussions they don't
think you're gonna see, that there's a reason
we should keep the Islamic State because it's
working for us.
And it says stability is not a value
in and of itself, they write.
Very different to what we get told out
loud. Right? They write, it is desirable only
if it serves our interest. Wow. That's exactly
what's going on. They don't care about stability.
They'll they'll take whatever. As long as they
get what they want, they'll that's good. If
stability makes we us get, well, then good.
We'll take stability. If chaos makes us get,
well, then we'll take chaos.
They love to present them as fighting for
you when at on everything you can find
that they're clearly showing you that they are
at the interest of themselves.
It says the defeat of the Islamic State
would encourage Iranian hegemony in the region, which
I I disagree with. Either way, that's what
they're arguing, and buttress Russia's role
and prolong Assad's tyranny.
So getting rid of the terrorist group that
you claim you're fighting and that all of
them are supporting
would help them. How does that make sense?
If they're supporting it, how would you see
what I'm saying? Like, it shows you that
the narratives they know
they're telling the the narrative they're putting out
there, they know are false
on the surface of it. There's not some
kind of disregard, like, a a middle ground
where they're like, we're not sure. They know
they're deliberately lying to you. They're keeping this
group in power that they claim they're fighting
in order to, I guess, the stated narrative
here, stop the
that rather if they were gone, it would
allow the group their their claim are working
with them to expand. It just doesn't make
any sense. It says on the other senior
Israeli figures also saw an opportunity in the
growth of ISIS. Natali Bennett, now a former
prime minister of Israel, told,
the person writing this in a conference, quote,
a closed door annual gathering of the country's,
top very top political security is intelligence and
business elite, that's the the conference, told them
that, quote, that the emergence of ISIS would
offer Israel an opportunity
to legitimize
its annexation of the Golan Heights,
calling for a quintupling
of the Jewish occupation population to 100,000
in a 5 year period.
So not only are they saying we don't
want it to go away because it works
for us, but the, that the emergence of
it before all of that would have helped
us because it would legitimize our illegal interests.
This is this is these are mobsters.
They're they're literally writing out how breaking the
law would
I I mean, I don't need to stress
it anymore. It's a it speaks for itself.
It says that they argue that the chaos
in Syria now made Israel's claim more appealing
than ever to the international community.
So they don't care about your life. They
care about using your life to achieve their
goals.
Now, the last part, jihadis who love Jews.
It says in late November 2024, the world
was shocked
with the news that rebel forces, this is
what we're talking about today,
in Syria had seized Syria's second city of
Aleppo rather end of November, but we're talking
about the current situation.
This came just days after the announcement of
a ceasefire
between Israel and and Assad ally Hezbollah,
which what a lot of people point to
is the immediate what drove this into reality.
Israel did not want a ceasefire.
Significantly weakened by the year of conflict with
Israel, and Israel began its war on Gaza.
The latest advance was led by the Islamist
group, Hayat Der El Sham,
which has maintained control of the northwestern province
of Idlib.
So you it's there's no gap in between
this. The US government in Israel were fighting
this element or or rather pretending to fight
this element
on the record. And then just let it
exist and it'd live it'd live all the
way to this point in time. Well, Turkey
would dabble. They you know, Brett McGurk would
tell you it's the largest hot spot in
history when they want you to notice it
for one moment. White helmets would dance. The
point is that they've let it there. Now
they break out of that spot and overthrow
Syria. They're going, yay, revolution.
They it's like I I I again,
I I could've sat down for 15 minutes
and wrote you a better narrative. I just
don't know why they're pushing this stuff. Maybe
that's all they have. Maybe it's the only
outlets they can use.
It says Hayat al Shon grew out of
a merger of multiple radical Islamist groups in
Syria, most notably the Al Nusra front.
Its leader,
Jalani,
is previously a member of Al Qaeda, us
ISIS Al Nusra, as well as other jihadist
groups, and fought in both the Iraqi insurgency
and the Syrian war, leading to the state
department declaring him a specially designated global terrorist
and placing a $10,000,000 bounty on his head.
Now I don't believe he split from these
groups, but that's the
narrative. Now, though, Jelani is providing thoughtful interviews
to CNN where he promises Syria, under this
terrorist organization that is currently still called the
terrorist organization by the US and the UN,
will rule with a pluralist
country ready to join the civilized world and
weirdly dresses just like Zelensky now.
It says as well as working on
their PR with the liberal democratic west, this
new wave of jihadists
have also been keen to improve their relations
with Israel. Weird. Right?
Notably, the one time ISIS actually attacked Israeli
forces in a brief exchange,
it apologized.
Israel's state media outlet, Khan, interviewed some of
the jihadis leading today's advance who were surprisingly
grateful to the Zionist state. Those interviewed expressed
gratitude for Israeli strikes on Hezbollah and weapons
transfers within Syria, which have, quote, allowed us
to return the free lands of the country.
It says both said the rebels had no
issue with Israel.
They're public. Oh, we're good.
They said quote, we love Israel.
And we were never its enemies. That's what
they just said.
The person from Idlib. And it says quote,
Israel isn't hostile to those who are hostile
toward it. Who are not hostile toward it.
Well, that's not true. Israel's been hostile towards
people all over the world that weren't hostile
towards it. And it says, we don't hate
you. We love you very much. What a
dumb thing to say. Like, you can't get
more clumsy than that. These are supposedly terrorist
groups that they've all been fighting that are
going, we love you, Israel.
You're the greatest.
It's just it it what I expect from
clumsy Israeli propaganda.
And it says given that Israel is carrying
out a genocide on their Muslim brothers and
sisters in Gaza
and elsewhere,
you might think militant Muslims in Syria wouldn't
be the biggest fan of the Jewish state.
You know? But don't ask questions, ladies and
gentlemen. Yet Israeli media has ran multiple pieces
on this pro Israel sympathies of the chief
threats to Assad's rule.
The corporate media, a commander for the US
backed Free Syrian Army, assured Israel's channel 12
that, quote, we are open to friendship with
everyone in the region,
including Israel.
We don't have enemies other than the Assad
regime, Hezbollah, and Iran.
I they're they let the cat out of
the bag, guys. There's no way they could
argue they wanna make peace with everybody. But
to make to be like, we like Israel,
but we hate all of Israel's enemies, it's
very transparent, especially when those Israeli enemies
are explicit allies of what Syria is. And
it says what Israel did against Hezbollah, he's
continuing the quote, in Lebanon helped a great
deal. Now we are taking care of the
rest.
And that's where Netanyahu comes Netanyahu steps in
and goes, we did this together, and we're
fighting we're overthrowing Syria,
literally owning to working with Al Qaeda.
It says Assad was a key ally of
Iran
whose rule in Syria allowed them to access
the resistance highway of
basically the connection between Iran and Lebanon. A
Shia crescent extending across the Middle East right
up to the Israel's door. That's why they
wanted to break this up. If it comes
to pass, Assad so that Assad's fall will
follow a year of war on basically,
Assad's fall will potentially follow a year of
war on Hezbollah and Hamas that has significantly
dilibitated
each. That's what they're projecting might be the
next couple steps. Who or what will replace
Assad, which we're already seeing. They're putting the
head of the terrorist organization as the leader.
And whether Syria is an entity that will
survive the transition or be balkanized, which is
what they're promoting,
or collapse into years of sectarian conflict remains
to be seen. It says when Israeli support
for jihadist groups was first reported,
it sounded crazy.
Right? We this is what we keep I
remember pointing these things out and people look,
you're so crazy.
Now we know it was not just real,
but far greater extent than we expected.
Here's the article in regard to I mean,
I'll I'll include a lot of the documents
he ref why isn't that?
Scrolling up for some reason. There it goes.
Talking about the
the wet is what was I forget which
one this was.
It was one of the links from the
what we just read.
I'm I'm just including the source material from
what he was pointing out, even though it's
in the article, it's one I felt was
important to see. But the the the title
is the destruction of Islamic State is a
strategic oh, that's what it was. The the
the point is they're they're writing about how
they want to bolster the Islamic State because
getting rid of it would help their enemies,
which is exactly what we're talking about. Now
I broke this down. So, yeah, I played
the longer one so many times recently, but
it really is important. I I broke this
down into a little small clip, and I
added the 7 countries, 5 years point, to
see it in one sitting.
So based on what you just said, important
to hear this as well, and carry this
over from obviously Israel's agenda that the US
is carrying out.
It starts and it's it's really fascinating to
go back. It starts, in
1996
with Netanyahu,
who wrote a book called Fighting, Terrorism.
And the thesis of the book is, quite
straightforward and and and,
very dangerous.
He says, you know, there are there's Hamas.
There's Hezbollah. They oppose Israel. It's not good
for us to fight them directly.
That that won't work.
What we need to do is topple
the governments
that's that back them. So what we need
is regime change throughout the Middle East. And
he actually gave a long list of 7
countries,
that included,
Syria,
Libya,
Iraq,
Iran,
Somalia,
Sudan,
and Lebanon.
And systematically,
the United States has done Netanyahu's
bidding for
almost 30 years now
going to war
with every one of them except for the
big one, that Netanyahu so much longs for,
which is the war directly
between the United States and Iran. About 10
days after 9:11, I went through the Pentagon,
and I saw secretary Rumsfeld and
and deputy secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs
just to say hello to some of the
people on the joint staff who used used
to work for me, and one of the
generals called me and he said, sir, you
gotta
come in you gotta come in and talk
to me a second. I said, well, you're
too busy. He said, no. No. He says,
we've made the decision we're going to war
with Iraq.
This was on or about the 20th September.
So,
I said, well, did they find some information
collect connecting Saddam to Al Qaeda? He said,
no. No. He says there's nothing new that
way. They just made the decision to go
to war with Iraq. He said, I guess
it's like we don't know what to do
about terrorists, but
we've got a good military and we can
take down governments. And, he said, I guess
if the only tool you have is a
hammer, every problem has to look like a
nail.
So I came back to see him a
few weeks later,
and by that time, we were bombing in
Afghanistan. I said, are we still going to
war with Iraq? And he said, oh, it's
worse than that. He said he reached over
on his desk. He picked up a piece
of paper. He said, I just he said,
I just got this down from upstairs, meaning
the secretary of defense's office today. And he
said, this is a memo that describes how
we're gonna take out
7 countries
in 5 years,
starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon,
Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off Iran.
Very important to see that connection,
which I know most of you following this,
you've already seen this, you've already it's easy
to see. But for those that are new
to this, you can't ignore something like that.
Literally, as Jeffrey Sachs is laying out, the
fact that he wrote this book, I think
he just said 96, and I was showing
you the link there, and even showing you
how the US government literally has a page
where they have his book information listed as
it's it's very easy to see. The point
being that they say that that's what we
need to do, and then you can literally
see the US government initiate a plan to
go not just go off to the first
country, but lay out a plan to go
after those 7 countries. And what have we
seen ever since?
Exactly that. At the expense of American
everything.
Freedom, liberty,
I mean, influence over our own policy. I
mean, it's very clear what we've seen play
out.
That I just I actually just posted that
clip while it was playing on Twitter, if
you wanna grab just the clip. Now here's
the link to that
book he wrote, fighting terrorism, which is just
literally, hilariously,
like, as they're manufacturing terrorism, he writes a
book about how to fight terrorism. It's just
hilarious.
And no. That well, that's it right there.
The this is the, virtual library dot gov.
And it's I they don't have a list
for every book. You know? So it's crazy
that they have a list of his book
published in 2,001,
which they've later they've literally brought into fruition.
Now getting into the evidence on the Israeli
side of this, which it overlapped a bit,
but here is just unreal amounts of evidence.
And this is from from the second, but
about the current situation.
Information giver simply says Islamic terrorists are going
on Israeli TV. This is just I I
can't get past how crazy this has become
in a very short period of time. I
mean, crazy in the sense that I mean,
if I had said this would be happening,
like, 3 weeks ago, people would have said
I was ridiculous.
Like, that's how it's just it's crazy how
this rapidly shifts, and the things that were
40 seconds ago, like, the you're a racist
for saying it or, like, they're now going,
that's what we're doing. And the same people
who say you're racist are now going, you're
crazy for not believing that's what's happening. It's
just it's wild.
Islamic terrorists are going on Israeli TV and
saying that they love the Jewish state, and
they always have sided with Israel. That's what
I just read to you.
They are going they're just going,
they're going mask off with it now. They
said, I mean, why hide it? Which is
what I'm saying. Like, they're they're they're they're
desperate. They have no they're pulling out all
the stops. It says, it's not like everyone
who was paying attention didn't already know that,
which I do agree with. Now this is
the article from the second, which is right
here. Syrian rebels appear to credit Israeli strikes
on Hezbollah with aiding the shock advance. So
now you got them saying before even Netanyahu,
look. Their reason we're we're, you know, basically,
we're working con in conjunction with Israel,
which is not exactly it could've been just
we used it, but you can see as
this goes forward, not only does all the
evidence show that they're literally working for Israel,
but they're actually in the conjunction that they're
now showing you that,
which is one thing I find interesting.
Now, going back to the older information. So
that's we'll come back to the moment of
today. But, look, this stuff is goes back
a long way.
This is some of the stuff we referenced
in that article from 2017.
ISIS fighter regrets attacking Israel. Literally apologized.
I don't I mean, it's just it's kinda
the cartoonish stuff. Like, most of this stuff
gets noticed by somebody and they never they
never look back. You go, well, that's crazy.
But my point is most avid people, they
never see this stuff as much as this
is on Newsweek.
ISIS fighters apologized to Israel for attacking it.
Despite we're being told that their main objective
is to kill all the Jews in the
world. Somebody work that out for me.
Oh, and you know what? I'll grab this
too.
I think this is the one.
Well, this is one of them anyway. This
is from the No. This is from November
last year. And just like that, ISIS suddenly
starts attacking the enemies of Israel and the
US government. Again, completely by coincidence of course,
as usual.
After being a 100% defeated a few times
according to Trump. And so, this is, you
know,
right after that we saw post October 7th.
And you see the group that they claim
is fighting the Israel, suddenly start fighting Iran
who they claim is responsible for what happened
on the numbers.
It just It never stops being this silly.
And this obvious.
So here's foreign policy magazine
from 2018.
Inside Israel's secret program to back Syrian rebels,
otherwise known as terrorists.
Not up for debate.
Here is the article I showed you last
time, 2015.
Israel treating Al Qaeda fighters
when we did in Syria.
Here is Ynet News,
translated article from Hebrew.
Israel transfers money, food, and fuel to Syrian
rebels.
Here's this is this is one, that goes
so one of the references were for a
smaller amount. Here's what it says right here
according to Israeli media.
It says rebel officials said that Israel's giving
them $5,000
each a month.
As somebody was just saying, the point is,
you know, apparently,
Syrian soldiers get paid a hell of a
lot less. So it's not hard to see
that there's an opening for potential manipulation there
where people may just be hungry. Maybe they
just want money. Maybe they're not as morally
sound, and they just they my point is
it's easy to see how with flooding this
place with lots of funds from, you know,
funds they stole from you, by the way,
it's easy to see how you could manipulate
a situation. But the point, obviously, is that
Israel has always this is back from 2017.
Funding,
arming, feeding, paying the the salaries of terrorists
right on the surface.
This clip we played for you yesterday, but
I'll play I'll just well, it's a short
one. I'll play this one again. Now this
is from a former FBI counterterrorism
element, and he is, speaking about what we
all know. And he's just for whatever reason,
he decides to tell the truth because this
is provable.
Oh, so I did forget to grab that.
Hold on.
I
don't know how I did that.
There it is.
We created ISIS.
I mean, ISIS is no less than,
the people up in Islamberg, no less than
Golan, is a CIA creation.
I'm John McCain, for heaven's sake, was over
there with the with the ISIS officials.
We created them. They came from the Al
Narsai group, the, Syrian Liberation Front.
The these two organizations combined, and they they
they morphed into ISIS. It's our creation. We
create them. We still direct them. When
ISIS warriors are injured in in battle, where
are they transported? They're transported, for heaven's sake,
to Israel.
They're treated by the Israelis and Israeli hospitals
and brought back to battle. Well, fundamentally, the
rebels have admitted, acknowledged that they've been supported
by Israel and they they thank Israel for
helping them throughout. In fact, arms are oftentimes
caught. Israeli arms are caught on, you know,
en route to the rebel groups. But when
it come
Very and then distant we're in the same
lines, plan the same as short one. Play
it again. As I said before, this aspect
of our strategy
was moving too slowly,
but the fall of Ramadi has galvanized the
Iraqi government.
So with the additional steps I ordered last
month, we're speeding up training of ISIL forces.
Ben, there's no doubt
that these so called rebel forces,
attacking the government in Syria
are creatures of the United States and of
Israel.
Just wanted to show you again that somebody,
you know, that I think you would respect
wants to make sure you point that out.
And then just on a quick side note,
this is from 2014.
Just wanted to show you so is I
get more to show you for proof. I'm
realizing that we're talking at a point where,
historically, I think it's always been clear, but
where Israel's funding these elements. Right? So let's
not forget that this is not just against
the bat like, even if you think maybe
they're funding these elements because they're getting rid
of worse elements. No. No. They've been using
this against in everybody, including you at the
United States. So here's an article from Times
of Israel. Al Qaeda
planned to blow up US embassy in Tel
Aviv.
Now, I I mean, I guess you could
even I guess you could even argue not
against the US, but necessarily maybe even maybe
even with them. The point is still using
this even as a guise of going after
the US embassy, but as using their own
elements to threaten themselves to justify their agenda.
Sort of what it's sort of exactly what
Zionism does with the Jewish population all around
the world. Just think that's important to point
out.
Now Craig Murray also pointed this out, which
we were referencing, but just important for you
to see. We showed you this yesterday. This
is the US embassy in Syria.
The US you know, the US government.
Saying we remain committed from 2017
to bringing Al Qaeda
that basically
Al Qaeda in Syria figures to justice
in Hayat Der El Sham.
$10,000,000
reward.
That's how dumb this is. It's still there.
Still active. Craig Murray says, well, you might
wanna retweet this before you before they delete
it.
Here,
a Jerusalem Post article from 2014.
A new UN report reveals collaboration between Israel
and Syrian rebels. Now this is all about
Syrian rebels. The point is to remember that
the Syrian rebels have been overtly proven to
be terrorist groups. Hayat al Sham being one
of them, and today, you can literally see
them working with them. So it's not hard
to see the connection. But realize that as
we'll get for more into this, it's not
it's not just even the moderate rebels. It's
about Al Qaeda,
ISIS.
It's about the foundational elements that they created
to drive this element or rather just cultivated,
however you wanna look at it. The point
is that we can go back to Afghanistan
even before. That's what they do. That's the
that's the in this case, it's US Israeli
agenda to use it against Afghan or, Russia.
So even at the time, they did the
same thing later, doing the same thing in
Ukraine with with Russia for other agendas as
always, but working with I mean, for crying
out loud, look at the Nazi element in
in Ukraine that they're working alongside.
I don't mean to convince you guys of
this, but maybe somebody out there is on
the fence probably. And if you can just
take a second to look into how radical
those people are, no matter what you think
of Russia, recognize they're willing to work with
unsavory elements for their own agenda, usually at
the expense of
everything else.
And here's, 21st century wire reporting on the
same. UN report reveals how Israel is court
dating with
ISIS
militants inside of Syria.
Here's press TV. Tel Aviv, and this is
up today,
in direct contact with militants in Syria.
Now, of course, because people tend to who
just don't care to do their due diligence,
we reflexively go, that's Iranian press so therefore
it can't be true.
Here's the report from Israeli media.
Dramatic development, Syrian rebels in message to Israel.
And the point is exactly what they're reporting.
I'm in contact with the rebels in Syria
and have forwarded the senior official in the
country. So Israel is directly communicating with the
terrorist organization that is currently running Syria.
Pretty easy.
Now Patrick Henningston points out, that's where I
got the image from, the mask is off
now. The evidence is overwhelming. Israel is and
has been
working directly with Al Qaeda, Haider al Shamm,
ISIS in Syria and beyond.
They are committed allies and partners on every
level,
including intelligence sharing.
You must now revisit everything you've seen in
Syria and Iraq over the last 12 years
and view it through the revised lens of
reality.
This extends to the US and Turkish intelligence
too.
Now one thing that I actually should've grabbed
that I I'm just thinking about now,
same point, and and it goes to the
classic idea. Now this is what he's simply
pointing out is the first step to think
about. Right? The first step out, whether this
is something that just whether they're collaborating, which
they 100% are,
but it's bigger than that. And that's what
I'm trying to highlight here. Bolton and others.
You tell the story about how you try
to find out what the
what they call the Mossad when they deal
with, publicly? I thought it was a reasonable
question, but the trouble is, you can't pick
up the phone book. There's no, Langley in,
in in Israel as you can look up,
you know, CIA, or in our case, the
Mossad. We thought we should ask,
what shall we call it in English? You
can translate the Hebrew words, as I said,
Mossad is institute. But when they write a
letter to their friends in the CIA or
the British intelligence, what do they call themselves?
It took a while. It was a matter
of asking the prime minister's spokesman. The best
you could do because officially,
the Mossad is under the prime minister's office.
And, I think he sort of wondered why
you wanna know and all that, so we
explained. And he came up with, the Israeli
Secret Intelligence
Service. I mean, if it were to have
initials, it would be ISIS.
Just simple words like that. Interestingly enough, kind
of the British model.
Now just so it's clear for the podcast,
this is on C SPAN a long time
ago. Now I don't even think he was
necessarily make making the argument that they are
like, the point is at that point, I
argue this wasn't even and what are we
looking at? The 1990, I think? The point
is,
if that date's correct,
that you could argue that it wasn't even
existing in the same form to that point.
So they were just simply
just generally pointing it out. There wasn't a
bombshell at that point. But now you can
look back and connect the dots. Now, whether
that's the truth or not, it's up for
you to decide. I think the evidence is
transparently obvious. Here's another example. Now there's this
is, there's an article,
let's see which one who was that?
Trying to grab an article that,
Whitney wrote a while ago.
Let's see.
There it is.
This is an important one to see.
Israeli website claims ISIS commander revealed as Mossad
agent.
This is from Whitney Webb 2017 for Mint
Press News.
Here's another clip in the same vein.
So the podcast, this is the point same
discussion. ISIS commander captured Libya revealed to be
Israeli Mossad agent.
Mohammad Yasir Abu Allah.
Thank you.
First Brigade of the Mossad. Now of course,
just like any other context, he could've been
tortured,
coerced, he could be lying for some other
reason. Always consider that. That's just being honest.
Right? But with the full breadth of information,
it's not just based on a coerced testimony.
The rest of it comes together. And again,
read Whitney's article on that because it is
pretty intensive and it's it's incredible to see
how much is going on there.
I mean, these and again, you're never you
could spend the next 2 days putting this
stuff together. There's so much information.
Now this is another Mint Press News article
from 2,014
entitled Zionism and ISIS,
opposing forces or two sides of the same
coin? Well, that's where we're going with all
this today, and I think it's obvious what
we're talking about.
Now here are the stories of today.
You can just see the way this is
being reported across the board, whether it's left
or right media.
Syrian rebels topple Assad transforming the Middle East.
Really?
I mean, what ridiculous reporting? Like, you could
argue that transforming, it hasn't even fully happened
yet. Like, it just shows you what a
clear agenda it is and how aggressively these
forces can influence the media.
Syrian government collapse is an is a potential
win.
Syria, who are the main rebel groups, like,
not a word in here outside of way
buried about how they used to be about
what they really are. Al Qaeda terrorists.
Pretty crazy.
Now this last one Casey Wright shares, it
says, who wants to bet that Israel will
bomb Syria far less now that ISIS is
in charge? It's exactly the point. Now we'll
have to wait and see what happens, but
I think it's interesting to see if we
do see that rapid change. You'll say, well,
interesting that they stopped bombing once the terrorist
groups were actually in charge, which is what
we're all trying to point out. Now this,
which is in, subtitles,
simply says, sec sec a message of thanks
and gratitude to the hidden soldiers of our
revolution.
And it says, on top of the list
are the
parents of the martyrs and the men of
the white helmets. Just showing you exactly the
point as Vanessa, the rest. These are all
elements that have been coordinated and created.
Now,
in regard to what's happening currently,
this is as of today.
This is from Jerusalem Post. It says,
Halevi to Golani recruits.
So Israeli forces.
It says, we are engaged on 4 fronts.
We deployed to Syria last night. So this
is exactly what I was saying earlier.
So this is posted today, and we know
that something shifted yesterday. The point is that
I think this is exactly
the the reality of it. That ultimately, they
decided and deployed because of they they saw
an opening. They they they saw the agreement.
You know, sort of like Trump making an
agreement with Soleimani under a guise of diplomacy
when they just assassinated him at the airport.
That's how they operate.
So in this case, I'm theorizing
that the idea is they could have made
an agreement for them to pull back in
the interest of
not hurting civilians and maybe try a a
peaceful transition of power with the interest of
maybe taking it back later, and somebody took
advantage of that. They deployed last night, and
they are in Syria today despite that barely
being reported, if at all, by the corporate
media. But here, in the Israeli media, as
usual, they're telling you exactly what they don't
wanna say over here in the west.
IDF has officially engaged in the 4th front
of the war. They are in Syria now.
They're and by the way, one of the
worst in in the whole conversation,
the Gulani Brigade. Alavi made these comments after
deploying IDF troops to the buffer zone between
Syria and Israel. So in occupied Syria is
the point.
And that's where we can already see. And,
by the way, the reality is they're well
past just that, and we'll get to it
in a second. But that's where Netanyahu is
saying standing and telling you how he is
responsible for all of this.
David Miller is pointing it out. Netanyahu is
telling you that this is a Zionist coup,
and there are still people who will celebrate
the, quote, liberation of Syria by NATO Al
Qaeda shock troops. But this is the report
from, it's translated, but it says Netanyahu from
the location of the Syrian border, we the
system fell by our strikes. We'll show you
his direct statements.
Here is Asaf pointing out,
well, the war monitor saying demonic terrorists have
raised their flag on the Syrian side of
Mount Hermon. So that my point is again,
they're in Syria. So here are Syrian troops
that are holding up their flag just like
they did in in in
Gaza.
Right? And they said, no. No. No. They're
they're gonna let them go back home after
that. Well, let's see how that works out.
Right? Obviously, the question is not just about
they're not gonna give this back to a
to Assad. That's not they well, they can
fight for it back and that hopefully will
happen.
My point is, what about the Syrians?
Right? The Syrian individuals who moved, who fled,
who went to the border, who are, you
know what happened? All of a sudden, what
happened? They start displacing Syrians. Like, I get
I get the sense that's exactly what's gonna
happen. These people are disgusting human beings who
are very clearly racist. They do not wanna
work with these people as much as they
pretend to.
Just like you can point out that the
Ethiopian Jewish population in Israel are treated like
second class citizens. It's It's a very public
conversation. Why? Because they're black. They're Ethiopian.
That's what they'll tell you. So it's realized
this is not about some kind
of ideological dynamic other than Zionism against everybody
else.
I get the sense they're going to actually
displace. But whether they do or not, will
they let people go back to their homes
in the places they've already bombed?
Probably not.
We'll have to wait and see.
So it's the same thing. And Asaf points
out, we when we will, when we learn
to work together,
he's speaking to just Syrians at large, I
think, and not against each other, we will
win. Or maybe just everybody.
Until then, you'll see this flag on every
inch of our lands and continue the 100
years of shame. I guess now we'll say
free Palestine and free Syria.
Absolutely.
Dan Cohen. And by the way, this is
interesting on Netanyahu always does this because this
whole this is a propaganda war against you,
Americans.
This comes out in Hebrew,
and he puts out the exact same thing
in English. I'll I'll I'll I'll I I
don't actually don't think I'll play that. But
either way, one's in English, one's in Hebrew,
every time. But he's this is what Dan
says. Benjamin Netanyahu has just appeared in the
Golan Heights, occupied the legal territory, to take
credit for the collapse of the Syrian government.
Jalani is a tool. This is the real
master. Take a bow, Syrian revolutionaries.
And Patrick Hennings says his attention, all the
clueless regime change mob for Syria. You are
now stakeholders on the expansion of the greater
Israel project. That's what this is. Israel is
just getting started.
Now here, again, in case you forgot, is
the picture from yesterday, and that's what greater
Israel is. And there's the patch currently on
the arms of soldiers in Israel.
That is what they want.
And they're getting there,
but they want
all of it.
Craig Murray points out, so part of the
deal with the Zionists putting Al Jelani in
power is that Israel annexes yet more Syrian
territory.
Right? That's that's actually going back to that
map. That was kind of the argument from
that dot we showed yesterday. That, ultimately, you
you could argue that if they really only
wanted 2 thirds of it for their
designs on greater Israel, that they would create
a different location where Jelani would rule in
the northwestern
or northeastern location
up here.
And that would make sense, or
they would just take it all, which is
pro what I see more is more likely
because of who they are. But either way,
we'll see. And it says,
which Israel it basically saying, you know, that
they
the deal was to take all more of
the territory, but it says which Israel tanks
are currently doing.
That's so it's not just Golan Heights. Israeli
tanks are deployed inside of Syria. And it
says and that but that's not just because
he said it. We can I'll show you
next. But he says nobody is resisting.
And that's that's documented by everybody.
But Israel, nevertheless,
is bombing and shelling people apparently for fun.
Like, really let that sink in. George Galloway
says, they are bombing Syrian anti aircraft devices.
Syria is now lying defenseless on the floor.
Anyone can take a piece of her. Right?
So it's just the point is that they're
just at at this point now, this should
be
stop.
We've taken the territory. They have backed away.
What are you fighting with? Again, even corporate
media is responding to this. So what George
just said, they're they're essentially still trying to
take out what in what's is Syria as
an entity can do even though they control
it. How is that supposed to make sense?
How are you supposed to pretend that the
Syria revolution took place, and now they're in
control, but they're bombing their own things?
To my point, like, this is just so
lazy, and I don't know why part I
mean, the partisan people that are supporting it
are because they don't care about the truth
along with other interests. But there are some
people out there that are, I would argue,
being manipulated. And they just don't wanna admit
how clear this is, and I don't know
why.
Times of Israel reports today. Israeli strikes in
Damascus today have been very intensive. So let's
just move past all the b s. They're
currently bombing in Damascus in a location that
they control. You wanna explain that for me?
Breaking sir was,
Sarah Abdallah reports today, this this morning, bombing
Damascus.
Very populated civilian area.
Israel's dropping bombs on Syria's capital.
When continuing to strike villages in South Lebanon,
as I was saying earlier, despite the so
called ceasefire,
the relentless pounding of Gaza as well. This
is what western media calls liberation.
So this it's just sad. It really is
truly heartbreaking. These people are suffering. At the
core point of it, the individuals there, they
have nowhere to turn. There's no authority. There's
no police. There's no because the point I
mean, they exist. My point is that the
structure is collapsing because of what they're doing.
They now hold these locations. They're bombing everywhere
anyway. The bottom line is that these people's
lives have been destroyed.
And there's no moment in the future where
it seems like that's gonna be immediately solved.
And and yet the this is the most
imagine you're there. Imagine your city block is
being occupied, destroyed. You got maniacs with guns
shooting, raping, pillaging. And then you look on
the news, they're going, you've been saved.
You've been freed.
It's the same we see everywhere. Murdering children
in Lebanon or Gaza or Lebanon, and then
you look they their they they're rather murdering
your family in front of you, and then
you look on the TV and they go,
you're a terrorist.
But you just watch terrorists murder your family,
and then they tell you you're a terrorist.
What do you think that does to these
people?
Now this is live from The Guardian.
The future is ours, says Syrian rebel leader.
Israel carries out air strikes in Damascus, so
explain that for me.
It's just this is what's important to understand.
Like, because you've you will the information is
clear, at least what they're reporting, which I'd
be the first to say, very well could
not be the case because of how much
is shifting around. But what everyone seems to
be highlighting is that they has been there's
been basically little fighting. They backed away,
and so they're going, yay. We did it.
We're in control. And then we're Israel bombs
them, though. Right?
It's just I think it's obvious when you
understand that Israel is clearly fighting for its
own agenda against literally everybody. They'll use whoever
they want, you know, just like the US
government.
Or on top of it, what I was
saying before is I'm of the mind that
this is about trying to make it look
like there's they're fighting for freedom as opposed
to just being handed this thing where they
now are in control, essentially.
And so they are technically responsible. You understand?
See, if they could have been in middle
of a battle, they're not technically
that's not expected of them to then start
helping.
They'll never do that. I don't think they're
even capable of that. The point though is
that if they are done fighting, well, then
everyone's gonna go, okay. Especially those that bought
the narrative. Are you gonna start rebuilding? Are
you gonna help them?
It's not I just I'm I'm sadly convinced
that's the exact opposite that's gonna happen. The
Telegraph reports
Israeli air strikes are believed to have hit
the Syrian capital of Damascus, just in case
you wanna see it from a mainstream platform.
Rania Rania collects points out that the Israelis
are issuing warnings now to residents of southern
Syria, and this is what I was getting
at.
Here we go again.
Same thing in Gaza. They shifted it over
to Lebanon. Nobody cared or shifting in as
apparently now, hopefully not, but shifting the same
ploy tactic narrative, the the same cool the
lazy agenda.
Putting out evacuation notices and bombing everybody anyway.
Tunnels and human shields and whatever else, and
you're all Hamas, whatever narrative they could just
dump on this to make it easy,
to allow the Israeli
western media apparatus to just lie its way
through this even though we all see it.
They're issuing warnings to people in southern Syria.
Where are the Syrian forces of resistance to
defend people from this threat?
Oh, they backed away, apparently. Who knows if
that was because they gave up or they
made a deal? The point is that they
don't need to be bombing these people.
It says very scary. Israel is salivating at
the chance to expand its control over our
lands
and the ability to deter, it seems, absent.
It says urgent warning to the residents of
southern Syria and the following villages. Fighting in
such your areas, forcing IDF to act, and
we do not want to harm you. It's
the same thing.
And when I I honestly think it's a
combination of things. It's about
the same kind of terror and and and
violence that they it's it's a psychological warfare
game. You want these because and I think
it's partly because
they feel that I mean, Syria has been
pushing back. And just like every other position,
they take it on the people of Syria
that Israel thinks it's paying back. The Syrians
that helped helped them fight against you know,
helped Israel and Iran or whatever else or
rather Lebanon and Iran.
So, ultimately, right there, you could argue it's
just about hurting these people because that's what
they've done everywhere else. It shouldn't be shocking
to point that out.
Excuse me. But on top of that, it
could also be of just taking territory, which
I know is part of this. So it's
the same game. You float these things out,
you drive them out of the way, bomb
whoever you want anyway, and slowly keep taking
territory into the guys of fighting back the
bad guys. But guess what?
They already moved away. So you can see
how the narrative is that we've moved in
to fight for freedom and we're fighting our
way through, suddenly became they all backed away.
You see how that where and I I
get the more I read through this, the
more that makes sense to me. That, ultimately,
there was a it was a
a strategic defeat, right, where they ultimately allowed
themselves to move to be defeated in this
moment, but look at what they've done to
this agenda. Now Israel is effectively bombing a
place of controls and acting like it's in
a fight, which it's not, which you can
prove.
Just to justify, as narrative wise, that they're
taking more territory. At least that's what it
appears to me right now.
DD Geopolitics says, I hope it's becoming clear
that this was the plan all along. Cleanse
Gaza, cut Hezbollah off of the knees, overthrow
Assad, invade the Golan, and create a buffer
zone, which that could be their first step
right there. Turks and Israelis at it again.
Neo Ottomanism and the Greater Israel Project are
figuring out a way to coexist,
or rather, ultimately part of the same agenda.
So you can see as this is beginning,
I just hope, you know, it's it's just
sad to see the same thing tripling over
now.
Dan Cohen writes, here are the real leaders
of the CIA run revolution overlooking the newly
expanded frontiers of greater Israel. This is what
it looks like to quote liberate.
So,
this is what you this is is I
can't I don't know why I'm having trouble
reading these things today. If this is what
you think liberation looks like, you've been duped.
And it's Israeli government sitting there looking over
land they've illegally taken.
Now, Arnab Tran writes rejoicing that Al Qaeda
is, quote, at last replaced with the literal
offspring of Al Qaeda.
If that doesn't make you cynical, I'm not
sure what will. The Syrian people will probably
need a lot more courage and patience still.
Here is Emmanuel Macron.
The barbaric state has fallen at last.
I pay tribute to the searing people that
you're currently destroying, to their courage and their
patience. In this moment of uncertainty, I send
all the wishes to people. The point is
you're literally supporting a group that you have
waged war on this entire time. Like, the
entire reason for all of this is to
stop that group. And now that group takes
power and you go, yay, at last. What
it shows you is that was always the
objective at all costs. Fund every radical thing
in the world as long as we can
get Assad out of the way. And now
they're showing you that. It's as simple as
that.
Here is a supposed foreign intelligent entity, and
this is literally the clumsiest way they can
do this. Be and it's because it's being
rapidly done. They're simply going, yeah. They were
the worst in the world, but they've changed
now, and now we think they're good. That's
essentially the narrative.
Chief of Mi 6 10, 12 years ago,
we looked at all these Syrian opposition groups
and, and classified them into those that we
could support and those who will be on
the pale.
All of them were bad people.
I mean, it I mean, you could maybe
carve out some elements of, like, the Kurdish
dynamic weren't necessarily as bad as some the
point is, though, these elements
are shown to be the very things that
we're talking about in other context. The moderate
rebel umbrella. These people were I mean, they
use the word terrorist gets thrown around so
flimsily. The point is they were radicals. They
were willing to to go after minorities, to
kill, to murder, to be paid as mercenaries.
And so they just basically tried to make
a hierarchy of which ones were, you know,
hey. Look at that. The lesser of evils
in the context of a foreign policy dynamic.
It's what they do. And too close to
Al Qaeda. And Tahrir al Sham was definitely
in the latter category.
Meaning very, very bad. But I think, Abu
Mohammed al
the the leader, has made great efforts over
the last 10 years to distance himself from
those, terrorist groups.
So let me ask you this. If the
leader of the KKK set decided to distance
himself from the group and over the next
10 years was trying to make himself better,
would you guys suddenly think he was a
good guy?
The reason I use that is because these
very people are the ones that screech and
and clutch their pearls at any subtle reference
to something in that direction. The point is
it's absurd
to act like these people would do that
in any context, but let alone the idea
that you're talking about a group that you
guys have told us were the, like, the
the pictures they would paint. Many of cases
that you can easily prove, like beheading children,
raping, torturing, human shields.
So all those were crimes that you guys
told us he committed,
but he's changed his ways.
So we're gonna ignore all those crimes. Can
we do that? Can I break the law
and then just tell you different follow flowery
words and wait a couple years and I'm
free to go?
It just really shows you that these people
are not what they pretend to be and
that they know who they're actually dealing with.
And, certainly, the actions we've seen of Tahrir
e Sham over the last,
last 2 weeks has been those of a
liberation movement, not a terrorist organization.
Oh, you mean the narrative. So we write
down some nice words, and that's the point
is they have been kill killing people. Look
at what we can prove.
Right? It these are I mean, they're burning
we'll get to that next. They're burning churches.
They're attacking Christian groups.
I mean, I'm willing to bet you this
guy knows that.
These people are not on your side. Either
way, whether he knows it or not, the
narrative.
Last 2 weeks. So let's just ignore an
entire lifetime of terrorist activity.
It's just so dumb. And so I think
the the hope secretary will be asking
the, m I 5 and the the Joint
Terrorism Assessment Center for a review of the
situation,
about,
Tafrir e Shama. Oh, good. Let's review. Let's
do it. Look like like this is some
kind of a job interview.
It's time for your review. Are you still
a terrorist organization? No. You're on our side
now. Good times.
Whether it should remain on the, prescribed,
entity list, it would be rather ridiculous actually
if we're unable to engage with the new
leadership in Syria because of a prescription dating
back 12 years. Oh, yeah. It's ridiculous.
Even though it's not ridiculous in, like, every
other context you guys talk about things, every
other thing you talk about, it's like, how
dare you? You're not allowed to talk to
leaders we don't like. You're not allowed to
do this, but it'd be ridiculous for us
not to do it over here where it
suits our interest. That would be ridiculous.
These are just these paper
I mean, I just I I I wish
I could be in this conversation with these
people, like, because you just think these narratives
the only reason these things ever look normal
is because there's no pushback. Nobody has the
courage in these corp medium dynamics to go,
that's dumb. I mean, okay. Here's 47 examples
where you said the opposite yesterday.
Now it's obviously hyperbolic, but the re the
point is that you can show that over
the years, whether it's Trump and foreign leaders,
anything else.
Obviously, the point is that you guys have
set the level where you're there's they're just
a terror you can't engage with terrorists.
We said that 500 times about Hamas before
they eventually got forced to. But this one
would be ridiculous.
It is it's ridiculous that you guys even
have a job. The former head of Mi
6 says that they were too close to
Al Qaeda, but 12 years ago, they've they've,
you know, they've reevaluated themselves.
David Icke points out, the new Israel proxy
eyes of, quote, freedom. Former commander of Al
Qaeda
is the new leader of Syria.
Yay. Freedom.
Here is the interesting change,
which will lead us into the the partisan
hypocrisy of it all.
So Hannibal points out, they never gave Senoir
interview, and there's a good point to what
he was just saying. Funny how you guys
never tried to talk to Senoir to engage
with that adversary.
Isn't that what you just said? It'd be
ridiculous for a humble of course. Because that's
not one that you're allowed
to pretend to meet with. But it says,
they gave this head chopping Zionist dog an
interview immediately, and this was the change. There
there this is the
rapid change. How serious rebel leader went from
radical Jihadist to place wearing revolutionary.
Now here's another point to make. Let's say
he did change. Let's say he woke up
and said, you know what? I'm tired of
beheading children. I'm gonna be a better man.
Okay.
Can you not question whether he's lying to
you? I don't know. That's kinda crazy to
assume that a Jihadist,
terrorist organization might, you know, not tell the
truth.
That's too much. You're you're a racist. That's
crazy.
Guys, obviously,
you can't they're not asking the question of
whether they just change the way they look
in order to gain power.
See, I'm like, well, obviously, that should be
a question. One of the reasons why we
shouldn't just go, oh, a couple days later,
they're not a tourist terrorist organization anymore. It's
not about whether they deem them terrorists. They
use that word to cover everything they don't
like. It's about whether they have documented
crimes, and they do.
That should matter. In what world do we
pretend that you can have a you can
literally be had a child on live TV
and show the videos and images of it,
and that's not something you later get arrested
for because you just change what you say
about yourself.
This is just something someone shared on v
k that was funny. Same s h I
t, different a s a a hole. I
mean, it's guys, look at that. I mean,
you that almost looks like the same shirt.
Like the exact same like they just went
here. Take take Zelensky's ensemble.
We all laughed about how the guy constantly
wears the green star like he's he you
know, it's very obvious why. Because they needed
to stress in your mind that he's a
military thing. He's a he's a serious military
man. Not a not a TV actor that
pretends to be things. No. No. No. He's
serious. Can't you tell by his uniform?
Same stuff.
Alan McLeod points out this is how consent
is manufactured in real time.
In, quote, moderate jihadist leader,
they just can't make up new things, storms
Syria, but tells troops not to frighten children.
See that? That's how much he's changed. We
go from beheading children to going, don't scare
them, or at least that's what he yelled
out loud that they all promote because that's
the easiest thing to do, narrative.
And Alan also includes the revealed and he
he this is an article he put out
not too long ago.
It's it's an it's a bombshell. Read it.
Former, in quotes, Israeli spies who are currently
writing for US news.
Like this.
I'm not it's very easy to prove. And
I think even this one is the
what's his name? Ravik or Ravad? I forget
his name. But the point is, it's very,
very clear that people who are former, even
some cases like a Brian Mast overlap, currently
have connections are writing media critical or rather
that should be critical of Israel.
Don't frighten children. Like, just think how lazy
this is. And now, Caitlin Johnstone, this is
a long video where you can watch it.
She just breaks reads if somebody reads the
article she wrote,
Assad is out and woke Al Qaeda is
in. Here we are with woke Al Qaeda.
Like, this is how funny it is, especially
with the republican engagement with this.
She goes only a matter of time before
we start seeing former ISIS and Al Qaeda
members chatting it up on liberal western talk
shows with their preferred gender pronouns listed next
to their names.
I mean, it's not even a joke. It's
funny, but it's scary how real this is
becoming. Now mayor Tosi points out breaking. Khamz
has officially fallen. This was yesterday.
Damascus is about to fall. This could be
the end of Assad. He says bad news
is the Islamist replacement
is more insane than the regime. Now I
don't I'm I'm of the mind that I
don't think Assad's
government was as even remotely as crazy as
they pointed it out to be or claimed
it was. Either way, even this guy who
seemed to think that they were bad is
going this one's even worse because that's the
reality.
They they're putting a group in that is
a radical extremist group.
And he says, god help the people of
Syria. This person says, mayor, calm down. They're
woke jihadis. There's nothing to worry about. Here's
what it says. How serious,
quote, diversity friendly
jihadists
plan on building a state.
I mean, I've never seen something I mean,
I guess I shouldn't say that.
This is the kind of stupidity, the kind
of absurd narratives that we see when
they have a narrative they're committed to, and
for whatever reason, they're they don't like, rather,
there's only one direction they can go. I
mean, what else are you gonna do right
here? You have a group that we've the
you guys it's you know what? This is
exactly like the Azov movement. They spent decades,
rather a decade or so, telling us these
were Nazis. And then when that narrow when
that agenda got broken and they had to
shift to another direction,
they just went, never mind. They've never been
you're you're a liar. That's not true. They've
never been or at least it became so
they changed.
Right? That was the game back then, but
they changed even though the day before that,
you were telling us they were Nazis. It's
the same thing here. Now we're
broadening it out and going, no. No. Like,
12 years, they've rapidly changed. Now they're diversity
friendly jihadists.
Like, I'm I mean, you could like, I
bet you could find a Babylon Bee about
this or some old sat like a skit
where they're literally talking about friendly woke jihadists,
and we would all laugh. Here we are.
It's that old statement where the to 6
months between conspiracy and reality, or 6 months
between parity and US government action.
It's depressingly sad.
Diversity friendly jihadists?
God, I should have put that in the
title. My God. Well, here is
doctor Shiva highlighting what he just said and
saying, yes. There is an emerging bottoms up
anti Zionist workers movement in Syria that opposes
both US imperialism and Russia backed fascist Assad
regime, which I don't believe that's what we're
talking about. Like, again, this interesting framing between
who people you talk to.
So it's it's interesting even that sometimes even
honest people, whatever you think about this, could
fall for, you know, like, that they could
be so aware of what's going on with
Israel, but it's not recognized that they still
haven't come to
to terms with the lies of previous agendas.
But it goes, however, US imperialism under Trump
supported pro Zionist Islamic fundamentalists to suppress those
bottom up movements. So either way, his point
is that they're funding the terrorists to stop
movements they don't agree with.
And my point is that they're not we're
not talking about a fascist Assad regime. I
just don't I think you can prove that's
not what it was.
But to be clear, I don't support any
government. And I think any government with enough
power will lead to the same position.
But here is the EU
high representative for foreign affairs.
So, you know, a group right now that,
by and large, the Trump administration is calling
out every which way they can. Right?
They say the end of Assad's dictatorship is
a positive and long awaited development.
It also shows the weakness of Assad's backers,
Russia and Iran. Oh, yeah. A really weak
decade long resistance. Right?
It's just that's that's the game. They're weak
and they're losing and we're the best. That's
it's just that's what you do when you're
weak. You scream about how you're stronger than
everybody else, and it says our priority is
to ensure security in the region, hardly. I
work will work with the constructive partners in
Syria and the region. So, otherwise, we'll work
with the terrorists
that we just got done calling terrorists.
Patrick says, so a foreign backed Al Qaeda
coup in a sovereign UN member state, because
don't forget, their part of the United Nations,
is a positive development,
tells you a lot about these people's ideas
of what they think democracy is or whatever
you wanna think you're fighting for. Like, think
about how wild that is. You have a
member of the United Nations
who, as a democratically elected president, despite all
the things they lie about,
and you have people in that organization who
are praising a terrorist group that they call
terrorists, who is still designated a terrorist, who
takes over that country.
And they're going, this is a positive thing.
I mean, I I really do wanna stress
that this never would have been the reality
before October 7th.
What Israel did destroyed everything.
For in a positive way, at the end
of the day, for narrative wise. Like, they
murder people. That's nowhere positive. But for people
seeing through it now, that is a very
positive, you know,
positive note to a terrible thing. That people
are very much seeing through this, and it
extends to all of this. They are no
longer this moral authority if they ever were.
These people are literally backing the worst the
or a group that they we're telling you
were terrorists and
acting like it's another day.
They've lost, guys. They've lost control, and we
need to take advantage of it. My point
in all of this is that now you've
got members in the EU
that are on the same side as Trump's
administration.
I just wanna keep pointing that out. It's
not an attack on one side or the
other. They're all of the government in my
mind. Left, right, the same thing. And the
end of the day when it comes to
the agendas. My point is to highlight the
group everyone thinks is gonna save you from
that government. They're doing the same thing. And
they're on the same side of this narrative
as they always are when it comes to
the most important things. Because they're not fighting
for you.
As Glenn Greenwald points out, the US media,
2001 to 2017,
we must radically restructure our foreign policy and
civil liberties to vanquish the external threat of
Al Qaeda.
Don't forget that clip from 2015 where Trump
is calling for Bill Gates to help shut
down the Internet because people were being influenced
by ISIS.
That's the point.
Says the US media this week, we meet
the glamorous reformed media trained
wise, devise, diverse, excuse me, diverse, borderline woke
Al Qaeda leader prepared to govern Syria.
It's just silly.
And the point he's making more than anything
is that so we radically
restructure our entire understanding of foreign policy. We
affect our well, you you illegally, unconstitutionally
restrict our rights within that, guys,
to stop the person that you just cheered
on taking power?
Yep.
David points out, what a different 7 years
make. Same point.
At least we it says at least we
can file CIA is responsible for Islamic terrorism
under things that used to be called conspiracy
theories, but now are effing obvious.
I love that. He said I love when
the empire discredits itself like this. I agree.
It makes it very clear what's going on.
And that's the same point about the $10,000,000
bounty that's still there and now how he's
the new leader of saving Syria.
Alan McLeod points to what we're showing you
yesterday.
And this is not in this is an
important one to understand.
Every one of these people in history have
been like this. Oh, the major boogeyman of
the past. Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden,
Gulani.
What's the one I'm forgetting? The one that
they point out, Baghdadi, for example. Yeah. All
this is the same game. Here is The
Independent
calling
Osama bin Laden a warrior of peace. Anti
Soviet warrior puts his army on the road
to peace.
The point is, as always,
the biggest evil villains were 30 seconds before
that, a chief ally of the US and
Israel. And you cannot miss what that shows
you, especially with the point we're making today.
It's the same point.
Caitlin and this is what I was saying
earlier just to repeat.
Crazy
how the west went directly from we need
to occupy Afghanistan
for 2 decades to prevent it from become
being taken by the Taliban
to, yay, Syria is being taken over by
Al Qaeda.
You just can't it's the same point he
was just making.
The point is they were never really fighting
them. It was all a lie to restrict
your rights under the guise of fighting the
people they were working with. Now, Angelo points
out, expect BlackRock
and all the globalist vultures to soon take
a trip to liberated Syria.
They will further quote liberate Syria from the
weight of its resources.
Syrians will, quote, owe nothing and will be
happy.
And this is the point I wanna get
into for the next segment.
If you think for a second that, like,
right now with the people pushing the idea
that Trump is fighting the deep state or
Alex talking about fighting globalism or where, you
know, all this
If you can't recognize that this is the
most obvious example in the current moment in
the world of all of those things, of
the great reset, of the globalist idea of
technocracy, they are literally carrying this stuff out
in front of you. Now if if and
when he's right about this in black room,
which I guarantee is the case, we're already
seeing it. I'll show you in a minute.
A shell overlap.
The resource dynamic, the bulk of the area.
My point is to show that these people
are ignoring
on faith on its face
everything they think they're fighting because
they're being told not. They're being told to
support it. Trump and the rest of them
are going, yay. I saw it bad. He's
out. We're winning. And they go, okay.
Now conservatives out there who are not blinded
by Team Smart politics,
call it out.
Recognize that this is exactly the opposite. This
is this is the deep state. This is
what we're fighting,
and they are all a part of it.
All of them.
Same point here. Daniel McAdams.
The Iraqi Christian Foundation reports that Al Qaeda
in in in ISIS Al Qaeda and ISIS,
the groups in Syria right now, have officially
announced
the implementation
of Sharia law outside Aleppo's judicial palace. Okay.
Right now, all the Republicans cheering on the
fact that Syria was just saved.
Revolution.
Aleppo is free.
Okay. Weren't you guys the ones telling us
that you're screaming about how they're gonna in
initiate Sharia law for the place they take
over? Isn't that what you just told us
that we're fighting?
Now you're supporting that in Syria?
Please recognize that you're being played or that
you or if you recognize you're being played,
turn around and look at the partisan screamer
who's telling you not to care about that.
And recognize that they're a hypocrite, that they're
a deceiver.
Now whatever you think about Sharia Law and
what the implementation is, my point is only
to highlight the fact that that's hypocrisy.
That they're right now, by and large, leaning
in to this neocon agenda
that implements exactly what in every other context
they claim we're fighting against. That we need
to work with Israel to fight. But you're
supporting. That Israel's supporting right now. As Daniel
McAdams says, Sharia law in Syria, which by
the way was not the the case before
Israel and the United States destroyed it. It
had the 3rd largest Christian population of all
the Middle East, in fact.
Very easy to prove.
And yet, the people you pretend are fighting
to save your religion are destroying all of
it.
Now here is what Trump said. Trump responds
after rebels overtake Syria, ousting long time dictator
Assad is gone.
He has fled his country, which by the
way
again, the arguments they write about this I
I actually already read that, the statement. That's
right. The point was he makes it sound
like he fled and then, you know, the
point and that Russia didn't care. No. He's
in Moscow. So it makes Trump look stupid
that he's saying that before he knew what's
going on, which is usually how that works.
But it's all about agenda. You're trying to
make him look bad. Now why?
For the interest of Israel.
Here's what Daniel McAdam said.
This is the one I read to you
earlier. Opposition fighters in Syria and an unprecedented
move have totally taken.
And he made he you know, the lie
about how many soldiers are being killed in
Russia or the idea that, you know, I
we already went over it.
Now Jack Posobiec says, Trump, US should not
get involved. I mean, again, this is the
one of the most embarrassing things I think
he's ever said.
And, again, it's all about
supporting an agenda for another country, not American
interests.
He says notes that Assad's government is rapidly
collapsing.
Daniel McAdams says fascinating that Trump calls them
opposition fighters
when in fact they are on the current
US terrorist list.
And And more than anybody, we're supposed to
believe that Trump and and Israel are fighting
those things. Right?
Except in this case, where it suits their
interests like everywhere else. It says they are
the Al Qaeda I call Al Qaeda in
Syria. Someone has Trump's ear and is pumping
him full of lies. Now I don't know
why
he keeps getting in the out.
I don't I I think it's quite obvious
that Trump is not on your side. It's
been for far too long where he keep
playing the game where he's being played and
he's being tricked and he's listening to the
wrong people. If you think that's the case,
anyone in the world, maybe we should not
let him be in power.
Just like last time where he's, well, I
got tricked. Either way, it's too late now.
My point though is that he, I think,
is well aware of what he's doing.
Daniel also points out that BRICS News says,
just in, president elect Trump demands the United
States to stay out of Syria, not get
involved. He says, this is not our fight,
while currently occupying Syria. And while he's the
one saying, let's take their oil, let's make
sure we continue to take the oil.
And he goes, okay. Does that mean that
an end to CIA supported support of Hayat
al Sham,
which Trump incorrectly refers to as rebel fighters,
when in fact they are according to US
designation a terrorist group?
Same point.
Now I think I had that clip from
before. Let me see if I can find
it real quick.
It doesn't look like it.
Nope. There it is.
And they say he left troops in Syria.
You know what I did? I left troops
to take the oil. I took the oil.
The only troops I have are taking the
oil. They're protecting the oil. I took the
oil for We're
taking the oil. Well, maybe we will, maybe
we won't. They're protecting the facility. I don't
know. Maybe we should take I got I
love that so much where she is like
literally going, man, you're saying the wrong thing.
This, you know, putting words in his mouth
that he's like, no, no, no, not that.
We're taking it. No, no, no. You mean
you didn't take it?
It's just so it is so effing obvious
how no.
These it's just it's the whole apparatus that's
coming down, guys. I mean, they're literally falling
apart in front of us and people are
trying to pretend like it's not happening.
So he's telling you, we store stairs, steal
the oil, and we're gonna pretend like he's
now gonna go, we don't want this is
not our fight. We've got nothing to do
with this. Like, this is how dumb they
think you are. Wherever side you think you're
on, they're playing you as a fool.
And doctor Shiva, same point.
That they had the same clip or, I
mean, that same post, but one one's on
true social, one's on Twitter, same exact statement.
And doctor Shiva says, woah, Trump is a
gaslighting POS.
Trump is the one in 2017
who illegally bombed Syria against international
law and then did a fake withdrawal arming
Islam Islamic radicals in Syria through proxies, Turkey,
Qatar, Saudi Arabia, leading to the current bedlam.
Exactly.
And a fake withdraw, which which did more
than once he did that. Where he was
like, we're gonna get out. Promise. And everyone's
like, see, he's gonna do it. And we
said, probably not. They go, well, you hate
Trump. And then 30 seconds later, he's like,
oh, Assad, chemical weapons. We have to stay.
Exactly what we said would happen. And by
the way, they lied about that too. Or
Trump got played, you know, whatever makes you
sleep at night. Bottom line is they all
lied to us, and he's doing it again.
Ben Norton says this is a very stupid
statement in regard to what Trump said because
and and makes the point same point I'm
making.
And the US is already extremely involved in
Syria. 1, US troops are illegally, militarily occupying
the oil rich eastern territory. Donald Trump himself
boasted that. I just showed you.
There and he says, and and left them
to steal it thereby denying the Syrian government
the revenue it desperately needed to rebuild after
decades of US field war. That was the
point. And they basically admitted that. And then
in other context, even refused to allow other
people to help them rebuild because we can't
let Assad rebuild. It's always been about their
own power,
transparently so. Number 2, he says the US
and EU have been crushing Syria for 10
years for for years with illegal sanctions. The
UN's top expert on unilateral coercive measures, special
repertoire, Al, Alina Duon wrote that these sanctions
are outrageous,
are suffocating millions of Syrian civilians, and many
amount to crimes against humanity.
That's what they all are. These are financial
terrorist acts.
They're doing this to hurt the civilians. If
you go back far enough to, like, the
Kissinger, they they write this stuff down.
This is used to hurt those people, so
they revolt against their government. Like, I mean,
that's that same clip we play of Giuliani.
Right? Where he admits that what what makes
a good revolution
is when people starve.
What is it?
Oh, it's Rudy, I think.
There it is.
This is who they are. So now tell
me that you're not a serious threat.
It's the regime we're trying to overthrow sees
us as a threat. He's speaking to the
MEK, a radical terrorist organization that was
registered as one not too long ago, taken
off by Clinton, I believe, and ultimately
is the one they want to replace in
Iran. And this is a terrorist organization, a
terrifying group. He's only there because he's being
paid, and and they support it ultimately.
But this is what he tells you is
what demonstrates a good regime change.
You are a threat.
It is a reality. The protests are getting
worse. I don't know when we're going to
overthrow them. It could be in a few
days, months, a couple of years, but it's
gonna
happen. They are going to be overthrown.
The people of Iran obviously have now had
enough.
The sanctions are working.
The currency
is
going to nothing. Okay. So very clearly, you
can see that the sanctions are working. Currency
going nothing means that's part of it. Right?
So we are doing that even though they
always look back and go look what their
currency is like. They can't even run their
country.
And they just play on the ignorance of
the arid person.
They're where Russia was. They're where Poland was.
We see signs of young men and women
saying, give me some food.
We saw a sign of a man trying
to sell his internal organs for 500 American
dollars,
probably a fortune in Iran today.
This is truly pitiful.
These are the kinds of conditions that lead
to
successful
revolution. And Pitiful.
So kicking them while they're down too. So
in a way, making fun of them for
the situation that you put them in.
I guess these are monsters.
The kind of person that can be paid
to stand up and gloat about starving people
into the position of selling their organs for
food and then make that out to be
how you have a successful regime change is
exactly the point. They're showing you who they
are. He didn't think this would be public,
I'd argue. This is a weird I think
somebody filmed this. These are he's being paid
to speak to a terrorist organization,
who, by the way, is they all support
Trump. All of they're all they are all
in this together, guys. You cannot miss that
by now with all the overlaps.
So he goes he goes on to say,
and this was the same point for 2,
the coercive sanctions like we just highlighted.
And the point was these western sanctions, along
with the US theft of their oil, have
denied the country access to foreign currency, thereby
causing high in flight levels of inflation, shortage
of food, and other crucial imports. So just
like Venezuela,
they manufacture
these positions and then go, look at how
bad they are. They have to they're starving
their own people. And you get partisan screamers
who jump in and go, Yeah, we can
prove it! And it's so transparently obvious.
Sanctions lead to decline. I mean, these are
economic sanctions, they're going after their currency, which
then immediately makes the
lowest of the level suffer. You think the
rich oligarchy, which exists in every country, is
gonna suffer? No. The people on the ground
are gonna suffer. That's the point. Like he
just said. So they then get so desperate
that they push back on their government, even
if they know it's not them. I've made
that point many times. If your child is
starving in your arms, do you really give
a do you really care which person takes
power at that point? You just want your
child not to die. So you go, you
know what? I don't even care anymore. The
US, fine. Take power. I don't care. You're
desperate. That's the point.
They used to tell me they used to
be at least they would write these things
down in documents, and we've talked about it
in the past. Now they lie about it.
Suddenly, the department of war becomes the state
department, and now it's where we are today.
The US sponsored
economic collapse is caused by the by is
causing the Syrian state itself to collapse, and
Al Qaeda linked extremists are benefiting.
The US already spent 1,000,000,000 of dollars over
the years arming and training extremist rebels. Now
mind you, this all would go this was
all through Trump's administration.
Many of whom are because remember this is
be this is predicated on Trump saying, we
don't wanna have any part in this. Syria,
many of the,
many of whom then promote, promptly joined Al
Qaeda and ISIS. This is called Operation Timber
Sycamore, and it was the largest CIA covert
operation since operation cyclone in Afghanistan in the
eighties, which gave birth to Al Qaeda and
the Taliban. That's what we're referencing earlier.
Of the many foreign powers that have intervened
in Syria, the US empire is by far
the most responsible for the chaos in the
country. Now that's you could argue that maybe
Israel was driving the whole thing, but I
would argue it's clear that on the surface,
the US is the most transparently involved. Trump
wants to act like he had nothing to
do with it, but he was just as
complicit as Obama and Biden. I completely agree
with that. Now a rebranded Al Qaeda death
squad calling itself Hyatt Jar al Sham has
been has which was empowered by the US
dirty wars close to taking power. If it
does seize Damascus and unleashes terror upon the
Syrian people, which it seems to be, and
its neighbors,
is is the US empire that is responsible.
So for him to pretend that he's somehow
not this is not our fight. It's that's
meant to throw a bone. That that's meant
to, right now, make whatever Biden does in
response look ridiculous, and it's meant to make
them look like he's the peace guy for
when he comes into power. Who which by
the by the way will then completely invert
to we need to fight the bad guys
versus, you know, basically whatever Israel's interest is.
And then but they'll fill it in with
a nice sounding narrative, so they all go,
no. No. Now this is what we do.
I know we just said this, but now
here's the true thing because Trump's now in
power. Narrative. Narrative. Narrative.
Doesn't matter. You know as I well as
I know these partisans will jump to defend
whatever their guy says next, even if it
immediately contradicts from before. And that's what we
always say. We step into it going, this
is what's gonna probably happen. They go, no,
you're crazy. And then they tell you that's
gonna happen next with a new narrative, and
they go, you're wrong though, because here's why.
I never said why. I simply said it
would come to pass.
Now here's what Scott Ritter
says. The black flag of salaf Salafist Islam
has been raised over Damascus.
ISIS, Al Qaeda have won. All you chest
pounding America First hyperpatriots
need to reflect on the following.
The same terrorists who attacked us on 911.
Now I I would I'm meaning this in
the context of all of it, including Israel,
whom we waged war against in Afghanistan, Iraq,
and elsewhere.
Losing thousands of our servicemen and women. Now
even even better to make it only about
the narrative because most of them would I
mean, I don't even know how that works.
I think a lot of them are aware
of 911 lies. But let's just say most
of them are in the mindset that, you
know, these Islamist terrorists attack us because they
hate our freedom.
These are the ones the as he says,
the America first chest pounders
who are just telling us about the threat
of this, who are now supporting it in
Syria because Israel and Trump told them to.
His point is, what about all the Americans
that were killed fighting that very thing? In
fact, this exact group
costing 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars. What about the money?
He says they won, and we helped them.
America stands for nothing.
I don't want to hear anything more about
911, he says. Now, I don't agree with
the last part. As always, my point is
we are not them.
This is an entity pretending to represent you,
pretending to fight for what you want, and
convincing a lot of people they are while
doing the opposite.
So we did not help them. The o
US government helped them. We were lied to.
America, which is us, the people, stands for
what we believe we stand for, which is
multifaceted.
They don't stand for anything.
They use what we believe in to manipulate
us. That's how it has to be understood,
in my opinion.
Now, antiwar.com
writes, as is today, in Damascus,
Jalani declares,
Mujahideen,
victorious against Assad.
Don't you love that? Same point as before.
So we got moderate jihadists,
who they seem to just not be out
maybe if it was a moderate intifada, maybe
they all freak out, but, you know, different
word all of a sudden. I point this
to the hypocrisy of claiming that these words
always mean the bad thing when now you
have one that is far more in that
direction that they go, oh, no. It's a
moderate. It's okay. Well, now, we've got that
moderate jihadist going, yay. Moo has a gene,
victorious.
Okay? Which if you remember,
simply means guerrilla fighting, but specifically
more so towards non Muslim entities. Okay.
Even though they're largely fighting Muslim entities, but
who cares about that? The point is that
he want he's screaming about the things that
they just did. Can you really make sense
of a of a republican administration openly supporting
a terrorist group who's screaming mujahideen,
the jihadi
as, like, a freedom element? Now I'm not
even saying you have to mean those words
or necessarily. My point is that the the
perception of it.
So as it says, Giuliani, the leader of
Al Qaeda offshoot Haitzel Shamm, delivered a victory
speech,
declarring the success of the Mahujahideen
against Assad.
Today, Syria is purified, he says. Oh, it's
some interesting language coming off of genocide and
the very extremist prophetic mindsets. Thanks to all
god all god almighty, and then thanks to
the heroic mujahideen.
I just want people to reflect on how
silly this is when you have people that
would have lost their minds 10 seconds ago
in other context if these words were spoken
by pink haired people in some school in
the United States. But now, they're openly supporting
the actual terrorist organization
while they say these things because the people
they support told them to.
Daniel McAdams points out, okay. Same point for
these people out there. I'm
speaking to the conservatives that are honest enough
to see why this is wrong.
Look at the people telling you to support
this. Now recognize, as Daniel's pointing out, armed
groups in Syria, the ones they're funding and
supporting. And, guys, this is the point. This
is these are the groups that there's no
resistance to this point. These are the groups
that Israel and the United States have funded
and are telling you are the revolutionary guys
freeing Syria. Here they are, looting
furniture.
Rather, it says, groups steal and loot furniture
in a shrine at the Damascus countryside.
Now he says, as they did last time,
they marauded throughout Syria. The, quote, rebels are
destroying Christian churches.
American Christians will be silent.
Again,
another example inside the church itself, Syrian girl.
A church in Damascus right now, this is
yesterday,
reports are showing that they're basically burning these
things and breaking and and doing what you
might expect.
But as always, we have to wait to
see this thing flush out because it's easy
to see how people can be as misinformed
in the height of all this. But but,
again, you can see the oh, yeah. What's
funny is you go back to people claiming
that I saw a verified video of gangs
in Colorado. Well and then you dismiss the
videos elsewhere that you don't like.
But a church in Damascus right now
has Israeli backed Al Qaeda as at the
gate. It says my faith will not be
broken, nor will my faith grow weary.
You are one who never forgets me. That's
what they're saying is they're basically waiting to
be stormed inside the church.
Now Daniel says, soon all the Christians will
be slaughtered
as in Gaza and Lebanon, which has happened.
And American Christians will cheer it on like
baking,
like barking seals. I hope not. But the
reality is that this is something that should
be outrageous to you right now. And it
seems that most of the people who would
normally point this out have been tricked into
supporting it.
Candace Owens,
glad she's calling it out.
They are erasing Christian history all across the
Middle East, which if you point this out,
you look at what the even the war
on terror who clearly leading Israel's agenda
have predominantly focused on Christian locations and Christian
populations.
It's not hard to see.
Like we said in Syria, targeting the places
that have again, 3rd largest Christian population of
all the Middle East. And don't that's why,
by the way, that while they were doing
this, the US media was lying about that.
You brought that up and they'd laugh at
you. They're all Muslim terrorists, they would say.
No. They had the 3rd largest it's very
easy to prove, and now they have destroyed
it. Same thing in Gaza for that matter.
But she said they're erasing Christian populations or
Christian history all across Middle East. Christians in
the west
are completely oblivious to what they have been
supporting.
Oh, I thought, oh, here it is. This
is
Dave Smith saying the bottom line, take it
for what you will, he says that is
that the term woke right
makes perfect sense
when applied to pro Israel right wingers. I
love that he's saying that because it's a
it's not even just about Israel, but that's
where it's the most prominent.
You know, being okay censoring people because they
say mean things about Israel. You're the same
thing. It's just a different narrative, different flavor.
What's funny about it though is now you've
got leading people in the right who are
calling it out. Because often I'll say this,
they go, what's the woke right? You're an
idiot. And it's like, no. It's very clear,
by the way. These people that are in
that woke, right, don't wanna acknowledge
that somehow it applies both way. It's just
about being a hypocrite. It's about being okay
with censorship and suppression and, they write it
out right here. The point though is you
it's no more prominent than in the Israeli
right winger side of it, which I think
is simply a contradiction. I don't even think
that's about right wing anything. That's about Israeli
manipulation.
But he says the parallels are obvious. He
goes, the term makes no sense when applied
to American first noninterventionalist.
I don't know if that's the case. I
mean, I I think right now, what he's
trying to say is that if you're not
necessarily which I don't even know how that's
possible. But, like, right now, I because my
point is the partisan dynamic. You're invested in
whatever they tell you to get invested in,
mostly. I'm not even saying that that again,
there's a line for me between conservatives and
then people that are team sport politics just
transparently.
They don't care. They fight for whatever the
narrative is.
Where you decide they land, it is up
to you.
My point though is that I think all
of them in the partisan side of it
are, you know, listening to what the narrative
is supposed to be and then whether they
decide to fall into it blindly or not
is the divide. My point is that he's
saying an American noninterventionalist. So people that are
American first,
whatever you think that means,
not interested in wars overseas, fighting for Israel.
It doesn't make sense to call it a
woke rye. But, okay, hypothetically, you could be
in that exact category, but then still think
it's okay to let's say, for example,
docs
and get fired a person from a store
who made a bad joke about Trump.
See my point? That has nothing to do
with Israel. That has nothing to do with
foreign wars, but that happened a lot.
Or and many other examples. So I can
I flatly disagree with him? I think the
woke right and the woke left are simply
people who are hypocritical,
who are willing to allow their agenda to
be like, basically, you can censor them and
arrest them and do it as long as
the if they're doing the thing I don't
like. That's what it basically amounts to. Now
he says and then he goes on to
say, it's embarrassing to see people twist themselves
into pretzels defending the accusation. Well, I think
I just made a very clear case for
it. But he's pointing to somebody else when
he says this. He says, let's debate this.
It's an important topic, especially right now. This
guy says James Lindsay won't defend his garbage
analysis.
Right? So I don't know if whatever James
Lindsay is saying, I think that's pretty clear
for what I said. But he Candace says,
everyone knows the woke right are the people
that built their careers off, quote, free speech
and the, quote, marketplace of ideas,
but resort to ad hominem attacks and calls
for censorship. Now right there, you could say,
period. That applies. It does. That she carries
on on the topic of Israel. But see
my point? Couldn't you clearly argue that without
that last part of the sentence, that it
would still apply?
Right? That they are they built their careers
on put lying about planning for fighting for
free speech, but then resort to ad homonyms
and calls for censorship
in any context.
I don't know why they're so I I
mean, I I can argue why I think
that's the case. I think you would get
where I would go with that. Why they're
so clearly hell bent on making it only
in the category about Israel. But either way,
the point is the woke right is obvious.
And he says, exactly.
I just think it's important to think about.
On that note, here's Newsmax.
Just a cartoonish platform as far as I'm
concerned, alone and broke against renewed insurgency.
This is the ex these exact platforms would
have been screaming about jihadist Islamic terrorism, and
that exact group
10 seconds ago should that have been the
narrative. Now suddenly, they go, no. They're good
guys. And here is your right wing platforms
going, insurgency, rebels, fighting for freedom.
This is the mainstream alternative media. As Assad's
rule at risk of collapse,
here is their head front page. Syrian rebels
topple dictator Assad.
It's very it's it's just these this is
bad journalism. And, of course, this is just
funny. He says, I have stopped wars with
tariffs.
No. You haven't. No. You really have not.
And this is what's funny is I'm not
gonna get into this now, but this is
it's just these people this is my point
about platforms like this. Their objective is to
fight for Trump's narratives.
That's my point about the woke whatever. We're
not even the woke right, but more so
the the the team sport politics side of
it.
But here's here's Reuters.
Syrian rebels topple Assad transforming Middle East. I
showed you that earlier. Right? Here's what's funny.
Take note of how Reuters, otherwise the mainstream
media,
seems to be telling you the same thing
that Newsmax is and what Trump and them
are telling you. So notice when they all
align
and what that shows you.
Here's a point of, 5 pillars sharing this
and this is as of today. It's saying
rebel leader, Jalani, right, so the leader of
Haitre Al Shamm Al Qaeda terrorist organization,
enters a mosque in Damascus.
Right? And you realize, this is where there's
no peep they have no resistance.
They have control.
And they enter damas they enter he he
basically, he's enters a mosque
giving a victory speech.
Okay. So you would argue this would be
the liberated Syria. Right? You should see women
and children and people gallivanting around. Oh, no.
That's what Syria looked like before. Right? Then
it did. You could easily see that. Not
Sharia law. Not or in so there's 2
points to make. That one, right now, the
people in Syria are not feeling free. Secondarily,
are and the what we keep hearing about
any other context about caravans from other places,
military age males. Right? It's all an agenda.
Well, I find it pretty interesting that not
only men noting the, clearly terrorist garb looking
people.
Funny how all I see right now are
a whole big bunch of military age males.
So what I want you to always consider
is that what you're looking at is not
some victory speech of the liberal in Syria,
but rather a coordinated propaganda tool of a
bunch of military age males that are, you
know, or terrorist organization or military entities,
which is exactly what that is.
And who? Maybe tomorrow?
All the women and children will come fleeing
back out in the fields. Everyone's happy and
life returns. I hope so. That that's the
same point as anything else.
Just because I may not want these people
in control or Israel to benefit from this
because they're clearly
taking advantage of everybody, if somehow tomorrow it
turned into some beautiful place and everyone was
happy, who wouldn't want that?
I would say good. I'm glad the Syrians
are happy as long as they want what's
going on there. And realize even that point
to be made, even let's just say it's
beautiful and happy and then and every Syrian's
like, I vote for something else. That's for
them to decide.
But
how
did the,
you guys can you not hear me right
now? Let me know in the chat.
Wouldn't surprise me.
Okay. Looks like the sound came back. But
either way, I think it's very interesting that
this would be exactly what you had called
out by largely, like, we're Trump circle type
people
if this was in a different context.
So one, again, the point is that this
is not what you would see in a
normal time of Syria before all this where
there was, you know, Christians and Muslims and
people living, coexisting alongside each other. There was
no restriction. You know, people in some cases
religiously did restrict themselves, wear certain things, but
you didn't have to. Same thing in Iran.
Despite all the narratives, there's a very clear
different overlapping point. And yes, there are still
restrictive parts that I would disagree with. But
anyway, the point is, in this case,
it's simple to show you that this is
a fabrication of what's really going on.
And this is Newsmax as well from today.
Syrian rebels topple president Assad. Prime minister calls
for free elections.
Is that the guy I showed you earlier?
Julali, I think was his name,
calling for free elections?
I mean, come on, guys. Like, there's 2
points to make here. I mean, I just
showed you again the point of Clinton and
the 2006 leaked
leaked information, I think 2017, but about 2,000
not
6 of Clinton saying that bringing the election
in Palestine. Right?
The point is that they rig everything everywhere.
We it's it's transparent.
These people are criminals.
And why we would ever believe that Israel
and the US together would allow some kind
of a free election to possibly have someone
in power that didn't align with their interests?
It's I mean, it's wildly naive to think
that would be the case. Certainly possible. But
on top of that,
why do we think that's even gonna happen
at all? They currently have power. The only
thing they would probably do is present you
with some kind of flimsy engagement to make
it look like there's something was you know,
at the end of the day,
you're putting a terrorist organization in power right
now. Why do we think they have any
credibility to call for anything?
DD Geopolitics makes the point pretty clear. So
strange that there's not a single mention
from this new Syrian trans trans,
transitional government
about liberating the Golan Heights
or expelling Americans from the Syria's oil rich
areas.
Funny that, other than the fact that those
are things that the US and Israel
are interested in. So what it shows you
is the person that's currently in power
doesn't care about giving things back to because,
ultimately, it's about them being in power.
There is no Syrian revolution. This is not
Syrian people that are fighting for what they
want. This is the US and Israel using
terrorist organizations to topple yet another country.
It's only gonna get worse.
Now I wanna point out a couple more
things to wrap up here.
One is that so we're being told this
is a transition. Right? We're this is Syrian
revolution. So now you got Syrians who, by
the way, very easy to prove by and
large, are somewhat in line with Iranian so,
like, that they're the Iranian country, Iranian people,
like, there's a bit major overlap.
So they're not hostile towards Iranians.
What's funny to me is that we're they
they really want you to think that these
are the Syrians for taking back their country.
Right? One of the first things they do,
they raid the Iranian embassy in Damascus and
and and once they take Damascus anyway, and
destroy the entire thing.
Probably it Israel, which we know are there,
looking for more information or something, but they
just wrecked the entire thing. So if this
is a group that's supposed to be respecting
change of power, international law, and all the
games they play, well, that doesn't make sense.
Other than Israel has a clear interest in
destroying or to maybe just a petty interest
in destroying Iranian embassies,
which they've already bombed elsewhere. Right?
Funny that overlap.
I just think it's very obvious that this
is not what they're claiming it is, but
that point's been made to death today.
This is another interesting point. So this is
just Sputnik.
This one says government buildings in Syrian capital,
Damascus including cut so that basically the point
was that I'm not that's what I was
saying. I should have referenced to the last
one. More than just Iranian location, government buildings
and government play they're they're just breaking, destroying,
seizing.
It's not a this is not a revolution
for freedom. But when you click on this
to try to get more information, well, it
takes you to this
Telegram channel, which by the way is here
for you if you wanna look at it.
But guess what? I'm not allowed to.
Tells me that it's not allowed to be
displayed because it's violating it violates a law
of the United States.
Freedom, democracy, free speech.
Now, obviously, we're currently in the Biden administration,
but the bottom line is,
mark my words, that's not gonna change. It's
only gonna get worse in Trump's administration. So
now we've got tell and I just saw
this interesting point of now you got the
intelligence agencies, like, telling us to use these
platforms. Like, there's something weird going on. The
bottom line is, that's crazy. That we're talking
about a Telegram channel
of information
about what they're doing in the middle of
Syria, and they say, no. You can't see
that channel. Sputnik channel. A literal media organization
from Russia.
And they're stopping you from seeing it because
they're the they're not violating your free speech.
It's wild.
Alright. Now press TV
cites Iran
saying what we would think the ones fighting
for freedom would be saying. That only the
Syrian people must decide Syria's fate without foreign
meddling. Now we just we played for you
earlier, Kevorka on the scene,
reporting on the reality that the Iranians backed
away because the Syrian government asked them to.
And that's where they took advantage of the
Israeli element.
The point though is that you can clearly
demonstrate that they respect the sovereignty of Syria,
unlike the rest of these supposed freedom fighting
elements that are supporting terrorism.
The point is that clearly, if we actually
believed in democracy, whatever else they pretend, that
this would be the case, that you would.
But see, this is what they want you
to think is happening, but it is not.
And then again, I showed you earlier, this
is from Sputnik, and this was from 6
hours ago.
Serious Assad and this is where they posted
this. But so my point is I think
this is from yesterday.
Syria's Assad resigns amid peaceful efforts.
Orders peaceful power handover according to Russia.
Syria's Assad, after negotiations with several participants, see,
this is what I'm talking about, in the
conflict in Syria decided to step down. Why
aren't you hearing this elsewhere? Firm his position
and leave the country giving instructions for peaceful
transfer of power. So I, again, re reiterate
the point that it seems to me that
there was a a deal made, and that
for whatever reason, these people believed that the
Israeli and Syria elements would be would hold
would be would honor their word.
Who knows why they would be that simple,
that naive?
Point is and if that's what happened.
They make a deal to minimize the casualties
there, to remove the you know, to make
this a peaceful element for the people of
Syria.
And when they back away and Iran backs
away, they rush in and take control and
start bombing and destroying and killing. That's what
we see happening right now.
And so that would make sense to me.
But as I said, these are all hypothetical.
We have to wait to see as this
develops.
Now, Kit also points out send this to
somebody in Syria saying, my mom is crying.
Rise out. This was yesterday. Because we're pretty
sure my uncle has been killed. Lost about
10 siblings in this war. The transition will
likely be won't will likely not be bloodless
either. She says, I imagine they will execute
the entire government using trials like Saddam's.
Kip Clarenberg says, this a CIA MI six
project, the Center For International Justice and Accountability,
which is what they used for Saddam, has
been preparing the ship for show trials
of Assad officials since May 2011,
before the civil war supposedly even started.
Now I thought which I think that I'm
not sure. I think that was the same
location. Either way, he's referencing the point of
what they're preparing for
executing the Assad government.
He thinks this will 100% happen. So, hopefully,
not. We'll wait and see.
Now, really quickly to end well, the last
two parts anyway, but just to wrap this
up, the point is that they were reporting,
very dishonestly, it seems, that Assad had been
killed in a plane crash. Now I'm actually
of the mind that this might have been
before he left for the interest of trying
to claim that he was dead and it's
over to to
maybe if it was on the edge of
maybe not winning, then it would have kicked
it over the edge. That way and whether
that's the case or not, my point is
historically, we see that more often than not.
Where they report that they fled the country,
then it turns out he didn't. And it
turns out the reason they said that is
to try to scare everyone to think that
they lost, so the soldiers would throw their
arms down and run. You know, that which
has happened before.
Either way, the point is he did not
actually crash. You can have to ask where
this came from and go have fun looking
on Twitter at all the Republican accounts who
were screaming about facts like this.
Syrian sources say, here's
the
Times of Israel, that that he may have
been killed in a plane crash during escape.
Well, it's different than escape when you make
an agreement for a peaceful transition
and then leave,
which is now what we're finding out in
regard to these reports. But the point, even
I'm not even talking about the Sputnik article.
I'm talking about the earlier conversation of some
kind of a deal. But this is what
was interesting.
Dabbling anarchist simply catches this and shows this
the, the screen. I grabbed the actual tweet.
Thank you for sharing this. He said, I
reckon the investigation into when we thought it
was the case or might have been, that
who shot down his plane is gonna be
a short one. But here's what's interesting.
This is the kind of thing that they
do.
Israel War Room shared a plane
right when that was being discussed.
Very obvious reasons. I think they leaned into
it even though it turns out I mean,
again, by the way, maybe tomorrow we find
out he's not in Moscow, and they did
kill him.
It's where we are right now. But it
does seem to be most of the evidence
points that he did flee and he's in
Moscow. And the bottom line is that they're
pointing out that they did kill him. Maybe
they thought they did. Either way, think about
that. Just just they're disgusting people.
Now, on May 19th, May 20th, May 19th
20th,
the Iranian president
had crashed in a helicopter crash. Right? We've
talked about that. I just wanna point out
that at the same time,
before
that was being reported, they tweeted out a
helicopter.
So I guess if it turns out he
crashed, that would be pretty revealing. Either way,
it seems that they're just desperate to I
mean, they want to own the murder of
a foreign asset. It's just these people are
gross.
Patrick Hennington says and this is the report
he just put out as of the, noon
today.
Syrian president Assad has and family, which is
good, are in in Moscow and Russia. They've
been granted asylum according to task,
Kremlin sources. It appears that Ham's plane crash
story might have been a red airing smokescreen
to facilitate their egress.
And last part of this, historically, we've seen,
as we already showed a couple examples of,
you know, cheering people away. We've been liberated.
Well, guys, it's not hard to recognize how
many times that has not turned out to
be the case. Almost every one of them.
As the squirrel points out, scenes from Libya
in 2011,
celebrations in the streets. Now, first of all,
let's recognize that we know most of these
were false.
People they paid, groups they knew were on
their side, and their true picture was quite
a bit different.
That's something we can prove today, not in
every single case. But reality being that they
very, very, very clearly lie about these things
going back as far as you could look,
then realize
even if they were all cheering for what
they thought was their victory, what they could
be lied to, manipulated,
coerced, bribed. But on top of that, how
did it turn out?
The opposite.
Selling slaves on an open market from the
liberated Libya. Right? That's what we're talking about.
He says dictatorship
is gone forever, they said. Freedom has come.
The voice over says, quote, the liberate the
lib excuse me. The Libyan people are hoping
for a quick recovery and see a bright
future ahead of them.
It was a very bright future indeed, he
said, is shining on the slave markets.
Like, let's be clear in case you don't
remember the reality that rapidly declined in absolute
chaos. It turned into a bunch of ro
roving war,
war what's the word I'm looking for?
Warlords, I guess, there were no war like,
leaders of war like, of different tribes and
elements. Remember, I think we talked about, what's
his name? Was it Hafta? That's weird. It's
been a funny how these things blend together
over the years.
I forget his name all of a sudden.
It was important because it was the guy
like, one side of the government supporting him,
the UN supported the other side. The point
was that it boil it it devolved into
a bunch of warring gangs fighting for resources,
and the people of Libya
dramatically suffered.
More than in any other context because they're
caught between all sorts of groups. They're getting
stolen from, raped, and tortured. It's terrifying.
And selling them on open slave markets, and
that was liberation.
And they've and they've they've never even looked
back until suddenly there was that back the
I think it was a couple years ago,
3, 4 years ago of that point in
Libya where the one guy was fighting for
something else, and all of a sudden, they
start talking about it again. So you guys
literally destroy it to nothing, and they're starting
to sell the people on markets that you
claimed you were saving,
and then you just walk away.
Clearly, they cared about freedom. Right?
Same point here. They're all cheering for freedom,
and it did not work out that way.
Same point. Olivia, who bought in to the
US, NATO, Israeli, Saudi, UAE propaganda, or was
being paid to say these things, took up
arms against Gaddafi thinking he was actually fighting
for freedom, democracy, and true Islam.
Reflects and this the point is, here he
is reflecting on that,
on what he did after the fall. He
said, if Gaddafi were alive now, I would
fight for him.
So this is how he peep honest people
get played.
Honest people. Or or take money because they're
starving.
Right? The bottom line is you look back
on it and he's pee in in one
case, he's just going, like, I made a
mistake.
Obviously, as the country has been destroyed. William
Van Wagon,
Wagonen
point the same thing out, saying they're screaming
Assad is gone now. Syrians can live in
peace, and Israel will leave us alone.
Well, he goes most Iraqis and Americans thought
the same after US troops invaded Baghdad.
2005,
he said I was in Baghdad and the
situation has become so bad with car bombings,
kidnappings, torture, that's Israel's MO, that an Iraqi
friend told me, quote, we just need some
foreign power to come and save us. See
my point? That's what they keep doing. They
get it to a point to where they're
so desperate that they don't really care.
It's it's
I mean, what's the it's like a it's
like an engineered
what's the best word for that? Like, they're
they're selling out their own interest because they're
desperate.
Now it's just one of my colleagues, Tom
Fox, was kidnapped and murdered, but Israel did
not orchestrate the US invasion of Iraq to
bring democracy to get or to get rid
of a dictator or stabilize the country. Israel's
goal was to create the collapse of the
Iraqi society,
which obviously was going to kill and hurt
a lot of people. Neocons and the Bush
administration immediately initiated policies to destroy the Iraqi
army,
spark a sectarian war, loot Iraqi oil, and
divide the country into weak ethnic enclaves that
could never threaten Israel, including the establishment of
the Kurdish state.
Same thing happening in Syria.
With Israel and its allies effectively in control
of Syria, he says, I'm extremely fearful for
Syrians, not just religious minorities, but also Syria's
Sunnis.
There's nothing sacred to these people.
Multiple air strikes on reported on air bases
in southern Syria. That's today.
Not just Damascus.
That's my point from before. They're bombing all
over. They're they're just killing people to kill
people, which by the way is exactly what
they were doing in Gaza.
Hassan Mafi says people keep sharing footage of
a bunch of Syrians dancing and celebrating, finally
being free from Assad. People in Libya danced
too, he said after Gaddafi was killed. Look
how much freedom they now have.
Important to make that point.
Now, Clint Russell
says, did Iraq become a flourishing democracy post
Saddam? How about Afghanistan post Taliban?
How about Libya's post Gaddafi? Which, by the
way, they're not post Taliban, so that's interesting
that he would say that. But he said,
I'm sure Syria post Assad will be the
successful regime change operation.
20 straight years of this stuff and people
still don't get it. I agree. I'm glad
he's saying that. But I do find it
odd that he seems to have a blank
spot for Israel. I don't know why. A
lot of these people do out there and
the side that I think is supporting Trump,
and I think I do think that's why.
He says the US embassy had $10,000,000 bounty
for the new leader of Syria. He was
a senior leader in Al Azer front. It's
the same point we're making for.
Of course, leaving off the part that this
is all being driven and ordered by Israel.
Speaking of a like, so on what's interesting
on one side of it, you've got,
let Clint Russell, at least calling out the
point that his the administration he's currently supports
is lying about.
On the other side of this, you got
someone like May Hassan
who has been on the right side of
the Palestinian issue for the most part, who
now flips it around and says bad guy
Assad. And I just want you to recognize,
in my opinion, it's people like this who
are not in the interest of any truth,
who use some cases of truth to gain
interest.
Now I could be wrong about that. Maybe
he just doesn't see the reality of what's
going on in Syria. Maybe I'm wrong about
Assad. They're all possibles.
All possibilities.
But he says some people who supported Palestinian
freedom for the last 14 months or how
about the polls of us for our entire
lives? How about that? Seems to be upset
about Syria's getting freedom from a dictator. I
guess it's just, you know, it's my point
is you could argue he's a bad leader,
did x, y, and z. But to claim
he's a dictator, I mean, by that definition
and so too is Biden or Trump or
obviously,
Netanyahu, but he would say the same. My
point though is that you can't just keep
throwing these things around like they're meaningless.
By what metric? I mean, of course, you're
gonna he's gonna point to a lot of
the things that we will immediately prove are
false. He will still point to the fake
allegations of chemical weapon, whatever else. But he
says, and a lot of the people who
spent the last 14 months opposing Palestinian freedom
are now cheering Syria's getting freedom.
So much moral inconsistency.
Opposing.
He says, and a lot of people who
spent the past 14 months opposing Palestinian freedom
are now cheering, Syria is getting freedom.
So he's trying to argue that they're you
know, the point is he's claiming that the
Syrians are being freed right now. I mean,
this is a guy who's pointing out the
terrorist over you so are you unaware this
is Hayat al Shammah? No. That's my point,
guys. He knows that.
So you can clearly draw a line where
he's being a hypocrite, at least about that.
I don't think he's honest.
Just wanna point that out. A lot of
games being played. Now Matt Kennard, to finish
here, points out that map of Shell's assets
in Syria. Now this is just Shell, the
the gas company.
My point is I think this is a
hell of a lot more than just gas
and just just Shell. But this is one
example.
This is their assets they were forced to
forfeit in 2011 because of u EU sanctions.
Libya's oil was divvied up to western companies
after NATO toppled Gaddafi.
A replay is unfortunately likely. So just on
the way out, putting the note out there.
We we have to be very aware of
what moves start happening.
So if and when they start dividing up
parts of the country, start letting corporations go
in and seize assets, which I promise you
is gonna happen.
I mean, it'll just add to the reality
that I think we should already be well
aware of. But it is not it's not
at all is it does it equal to
the freedom of Syrians?
And lastly, this is from last year, but
it says 20 years ago, the US warned
of Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction.
Well, how did that work out?
20 years.
Well, they lied about it, guys. We know
they lied about it. Not only they lie
about the weapons of mass destruction, they destroyed
Iraq for it. So all I'm hoping is
that the average person out there who maybe
wants to believe what Trump and the rest
are saying can see that we've been lied
to, and maybe they don't know that.
But I don't know why out of any
entity in the world,
any representative of the Israel or US government
would be taken at face value. I mean,
it it it's it's like like every it's
like taking a cur a a
like, a pathological
liar who has documented their entire life that
they are, like, are almost incapable of not
lying, and then taking them at face value
when they say something you agree with.
That's what's happening. These people have been caught
lying more times than anybody I can talk
about,
And now they're doing it again.
And honestly, I kinda think like everything else
that most people do actually see this. Because
it really is pretty silly to pretend that
the group that was 30 seconds ago, a
terrorist organization, is now the one freeing everybody
because we just it's it's Ukraine Azov all
over again. So I do think most people
see this. It's about the same conversation.
Why?
Or I I think I've explained why. But
ask why
they would continue to destroy what they have
built
to lie to you about this.
It points back to one thing
and why they would continue to
destroy all the things they built, destroy the
narratives they built, destroy the reputation they built,
the rules based order
in order to support a terrorist organization taking
power that they were I mean, spent just
as much resources convincing you were a terrorist
organization.
If we can't see by now the Zionist
influence in all of this, the very clear
7 countries, 5 years, Israel, Netanyahu dynamic that
they've carried out, and this is extension of
it, which will not translate to Iran. I
don't think you want to. And I think
my point is I think we're speaking to
everybody out there that is aware of this.
So make something happen.
Call this out. Break it down. Clip this
out. Have conversations about it. The reality is
that we see it.
The question is what we're gonna do next.
How do we stop this?
I mean, so we just in a very
short period of time, we've watched this spit
out into the obvious genocide of Gaza, the
obvious genocide of Lebanon. Now seems to be
becoming the obvious genocide of Syria.
I don't know why it would be any
different. I hope it isn't. Or I mean,
I hope it is. I hope it's not
more of the same.
But we see it continuing. We can't just
let this keep happening. I mean, at some
point, we do have to mobilize this into
something that is like, okay. They're not gonna
care.
I there are other paths to take than
violence.
But
mobilizing,
something physical, actually going I mean, I we
need to mobilize this into something that will
actually make these people change something.
Work with other groups that truly recognize what
we're dealing with here.
Stop using partisan lines to divide who you
work with because more people than you believe
actually see this. And it's much bigger as
maybe even Assad and Russia were aware of
than just one location.
So I'll leave it there for today, guys.
Thank you for tuning in.
I really hope that we can see this
because I'm tired of watching this happen over
and over.
And if you wanna continue supporting this platform
so we can continue to call in this
stuff out, there's plenty of ways below to
do so. We do need your help today
more than ever. But in general, I only
want it I really I want people to
support this platform because you believe what we're
doing, and you think the work is important.
As usual, it's important to point out that
we put this out for free.
There's there's
no contenders, no blocks, there's no paywalls, there's
no there's no ads.
This is simply because we believe in this
and we want you to see the truth.
And if you believe in that work and
you think it's valuable, show us what you
think it's worth.
We're gonna continue to do what we think
is important.
Thank you for being here. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.