Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24
hours. Saturday, November 30, 2024. Thank you for
joining me today. Got quite a bit to
get to, a lot to discuss today. I
decided to put off the main part of
the foreign policy conversation until tomorrow. I'm gonna
be interviewing Vanessa Bealey, and that that will
be put out tomorrow for sure, and I'll
be discussing a lot of its this with
her. Primarily, what's going on around Syria and
some other parts that I think are
are very, very much connected to a lot
of different larger dynamics taking place as I
think it's a pretty well discussed opinion right
now. Whether Israel, the United States taking advantage
of other things, we're gonna get to this
more so tomorrow. But I will jump over
after a brief start to go through rapidly
some of the things I just don't didn't
want you to miss.
I decided today it was much more important
to focus on what the title's discussing.
And what's really I'm really finding difficult, especially
with how much more is going on behind
the scenes for me and not getting to
show as much as I like,
it's becoming very difficult for me to to
decouple this because it's really the same conversation.
That's what's really difficult and really important to
understand.
That what we're discussing, it's not just what
Israel's doing in Palestine, but the larger conversation
of what Zionism is, its influence around the
world, and its overwhelmingly
obvious and overwhelming influence on the United States
government. Not just Trump's administration, but the US
government.
And to see but the point is to
to discuss the the larger foreign policy dynamic,
it's the same story. What they're dealing with,
how it overlaps, the influence, the reaction, the
things that they're doing in regard to influence
and power, but also in a distractionary sense.
To like, we're gonna discuss in brief parts
today, but more so tomorrow.
And so I the the problem is just
hard because there's so many points that I'd
like to make, but that I'll still make
in the show that it would be very
good to show it it a demonstrated a
demonstrable point. Like, so here is the how
this foreign policy points connects with the artificial
intelligence, with the idea of Bitcoin, with all
these different parts that are more so today
in the conversation of Trump's administration or more
specifically,
I guess, technically more broadly, but more to
the point,
just the US government. And and the reason
I keep stressing that is it's not about
left versus right, which is the only thing
a lot of partisans can kind of wrap
their mind around, and that's part of the
manipulation.
But it's about the government and it's
how whatever you see it as.
Occupation,
influence, bribery, blackmail,
you know, just that they've, over the long
period of time, politically manipulated it to the
point where Zionism is more important to them
than American interest or just the constant reality
of APAC funding people into power. I mean,
so the point of today
I I guess also I wanna I'm like,
I just remembered this.
The way I wrote the title
is very specific, and I I rarely, as
you guys know, make it, you know, just
this is the case, Which is not even
how often titles can be specific and stated
that don't will go through the nuance. But
usually, it's like, is this the case? Right?
Is this a coup of these two entities
over the US government? And the reason that
I stated it that way is that I
don't see how I can look at this
any different. I could definitely be wrong. That's
always possible. Something we could be missing. But
if you look if you if you come
through this with me today,
and you look at the information we're seeing,
overlapping this with this great panel we just
had with Catherine and Jason and Steve,
and and the
overlapping problems of the artificial intelligence, the technocracy,
and how those dovetail
undeniably
with Zionism in Israel right now. And then
that completely overlaps with the influence on this
current administration, but just the US government at
large.
I don't see how you could see this
differently. You the the the obvious influence. Now,
of course, it doesn't have to be as
as blanket statement as that might sound, that
this government has now taken control of this
government.
But, ultimately, that's what it would amount to,
just divine power structures. But recognizing that there
are entities, just Zionism in particular, let's say,
maybe there's parts of the Israeli government that
don't aren't involved or don't want this, just
hypothetically.
The point is that Zionism as an entity,
without question, has very clearly influenced US policy,
influenced people in positions of power. Then we
can see the technocratic side of this and
how obviously you can see which, again, don't
forget that I think Zionism and
and technocracy
or technocrats are very one and the same
right now in this conversation.
From the technocratic side of it, you see
the Donald Trump administration, the Peter Thiel influence,
the Elon Musk overlap, the Vance point, all
these diff or Vivek even.
But all the different overlaps between the two
and the obvious influence that has on what's
happening right now. And I just want at
least you to want people to at least
ask the question. Is this something much more
alarming than just
a shift in the winds?
That Americans want this or this is even
what our government decides to do, or is
it something that is being driven
against what we want?
And that's what I have a really hard
time getting around right now.
With the idea of the artificial intelligence overlap,
the the direction with Bitcoin, how you can
see these things coming together in a very
alarming point that we're all highlighting.
The the next technocratic step, the digital ID,
the social credit, the idea of all the
the biometric elements. All of this coming together
to put us in a place where it
really won't matter anymore
what we see and what we acknowledge.
I'm really I think all of us really
hope that we're wrong in that.
So if you walk through this today with
me, I think it'll be very clear what
at least I'm seeing, and I hope you'll
be able to share with people and recognize
how
problematic this is. And I think that this
is bigger than just this
current dynamic and this one topic. And I
think as we're gonna go through, you'll find
that this is something that has its threads
through damn near everything we're talking about. And
I think one of the major things to
get into is this idea of
this and this is what really brought it
to my mind
of the ethics,
the the basically the what we just recently
covered. The the one entitled Trump team barred
from agencies. The idea that there's multiple
documents or or processes they're supposed to go
through. One is the White House transition
aspect of it, which apparently just happened. The
other 2 are are an ethics pledge and
a transparency pledge.
Now my point before was I I I
frankly care very little about those because I
don't think any of these people are ethic
or are ethical or transparent.
They sign them anyway.
So the point is that, obviously, regardless if
we legal or legally
require they do that, they're all dishonest in
my opinion anyway. So it's not necessarily about
him doing it or not and what that
shows, but it's about what the legal openings
are with not doing that. And it really
concerned me when I found out that there's
very specific points that I'll go over more
today, that without these being signed and again,
it doesn't have to it could mean that
in 2 weeks from now, he decides to
sign them. The point is still the same.
What's happening right now?
And the idea being without these being signed,
they don't have to cap their donations at
$5,000. They can take donations from anyone, including
foreign entities, including foreign governments, and don't have
to divulge that. And on top of that,
there's no
pledges around
conflicts of interest. There's no insight into whether
they have lobbying issues that, in a way,
conflict with their interest with the US government.
Now all of this will hopefully,
maybe not with where this seems to go,
but hopefully, eventually, come to pass.
But right now, I'm worried about that exact
point. So that's where this all comes together.
Is there are we literally witnessing? Now let's,
for the sake of conversation, if it may
cause you to just revolt from this, remove
Israel from it. Pretend it's China. Because frankly,
it shouldn't matter to you if it's about
America first. Let's just say it's any other
government.
This opening allows a potential avenue for anybody
to be puppeteering what's happening, and we wouldn't
even see what was happening until it's too
late. And at this point, also, I'm wondering
why the Biden administration or Democrats at large
are not crying I mean, crying foul is
what I was gonna say. But there's a
lot of articles out there that discuss this,
as we'll go into.
But you'd be thinking there's a lot more
openings to go after him. Aren't we being
told this is about destroying Donald Trump? That
they hate you know,
taking every advantage they can to bring the
man down, which there are very clear elements
of that from both sides.
But for example, Donald Trump and even Elon
Musk, apparently, a lot of it coming through
e Alex Jones reporting that I can't verify.
I don't think anybody can. But that arguably
being
I think there are clear, provable elements of
dealing with foreign policy,
especially with the pledges we're just discussing. This
has not happened yet. They do not have
legal authority to do that. As an individual,
of course, but we're talking about Trump or
Elon reaching out to foreign
adversaries,
nuclear armed, currently hostile adversaries
and making con and and apparently conducting
negotiations.
And on top of that, the pledges that
we're talking about because they haven't been signed
means that they don't have access to whatever
insider information that the Biden administration may have
or the state department in regard to who
they're dealing with. So all that's to say,
maybe they have good intentions.
But, obviously, there's a legal problem there. So
why are the people who are supposed to
be going at every possible avenue to get
destroyed, why aren't they screaming about that?
Obviously, my point is I think it's just
the plan, your government. All of it is
in a means to an end, but you
can decide for yourself. So let's start with
a shout to what we recently just put
out.
Real and this is just to make sure
you don't miss it out of the gate.
We're gonna come back to this at the
latter half to talk about the idea of
bitcoin artificial intelligence, how that folds in with
the larger point today. But I just wanna
make sure you didn't miss this. This was
on our substack.
Co opting free and it was also on
the website. Co opting freedom, the Bitcoin slide
of hand, and the new AI control structure.
Great conversation.
This was with Catherine, Jason, myself, and Steve.
It's a really and this was this is
one of many panels coming your way.
And I'll also include the tag to this
the panels we've had so far. Oh, I
guess so I guess this was the 3rd
panel. I think I said 4th when we
we started it. I was counting this one
as
the announcement for the podcast. There's been 3
different panels so far.
And I did wanna shout out the the
so this was the the one that's on
BitShoot right now, has about 33100 views.
The one from before, the digital ID
panel, has over 50,000 views on BitShoot, which
I think is pretty cool. So it is
getting reach in places that are not artificially
manipulating data, which I think is important. On
that note, not I shouldn't say it like
that because I don't really know what's happening.
I just wanted to highlight that it's frustrating
that on Rumble, for some reason, our video
that we did yesterday is kinda stuck at
processing. We're at 33%.
It's been that way since yesterday. This has
happened to me before. And it the the
last one we we screamed about, we tagged
them, nobody responded. It took, like, a I
I don't forget. A while. Well past the
relevance of the information for it to be
seen. Now this obviously could just be a
glitch. These things these things happen. But I
would like to point out that for my
brief time with Super You, I'm that brief,
but it came and came and went. And
I'm not paid. I was just helping help
build something I thought was gonna be, well,
I think honestly could have changed a lot
of things for the better if that didn't
he didn't mysteriously die, which is if you
guys know the story, it's crazy.
The point though
is that I remember from that side, from
the back end of a platform,
these things are pretty they stand out. Right?
When you have this problem, there's somebody in
this process that's aware this thing is stuck
installed, and they could do something or they
could not. My point is if this was
Tucker or Jimmy Dore, I find it really
hard to believe that these would just sit.
Sir, of course, they have, you know, let
me call Rumble real quick and let me
know they have let them know I have
a problem. Any case, reach out to them.
If I I think it's frustrating that this
continues to happen to me, it's not the
first time. It's just like the old YouTube
problems where this would happen and nobody would
care. Well, co opting freedom right now is
paused at 33%
processing for Rumble. I wonder how long that
will take. I've also tweeted about it. I'll
push this back up in the
the top of the look at that. There
you go.
Hey, Rumble. For some reason, our panel from
yesterday isn't processing.
Reach out to them. I'm not suggesting I
know what's going on. Just shoot them an
email and say, hey, this system is wrong.
Help me out. This shouldn't be frozen this
way. Oh, that's right. I forgot to put
this in there. And just for fun, just
because we're talking about censorship for a minute,
or I guess the hypothetical part of that,
in this case, actual censorship.
Haven't had these from YouTube in a while.
And so I randomly grabbed I was bringing
up one of my pirate channels to use
today. And, oh, look, it just got a
got a strike.
And guess what it's for?
Murder by malfeasance, dioxin contamination, and the ongoing
cover up under literally medical misinformation. I guess
they were just to throw that
one at me again. This is crazy to
me. Not I mean, it shouldn't be because
we know that they there's no they don't
care. There's no guidelines. They do whatever the
hell they want. That's that's not hypothetical. We
know this today.
What's crazy to me is that this of
all shows, and here it is for you.
Check it out for yourself. Murder by malfeasance,
dioxin contamination, and the ongoing cover up of
all the shows they could have picked. Guys,
this one was ex this was the only
thing we talked about. I made I made
a point to just everything was put aside.
We focused just on this topic. And, guys,
if you watch this show, I challenge you
to find one thing anywhere in this show
that I talk about that is hypothetical. I
mean, in maybe in a few cases where
I point out where I think it may
go to. And and I'm very clear about
my opinion. But what it's based on,
by and large I mean, I shouldn't even
say that. The entire thing.
Government data,
peer reviewed studies,
provable evidence of what I mean, it this
is it's crazy to me that of all
the things they pick, which shows me something.
It shows me something, like usual, this is
a story that everyone should be screaming about,
and I'm not even talking about just Conyers,
Georgia. I'm talking about the overwhelmingly obvious, all
consuming problem that is dioxin contamination that it's
that we just don't care about because nobody
talks about it because partisan people don't care.
It is everywhere and it's the most dangerous
thing on the planet. Anyway, it blows me
away how things like this can just get
kicked aside.
Or, you know, it's the same far less
problematic,
which is crazy to say because of how
dangerous this is, but it's like glyphosate. Should
it matter that glyphosate is in everything in
the world? That it's everywhere? In the clothes,
in the water? It should. Not in this
broken world though where partisans control what we
actually point to. Anyway, I think that's crazy.
So just laughing about how medical misinformation
around provable data that shows the one thing
we're not supposed to talk about. And it
even shows you that there are things right
now that even YouTube is like, oh, not
that one. Don't talk about that.
Just think about that for a second and
ask yourself why that would be the one
after everything else we're talking about.
Now, also, I wanted to start with this
I found interesting. This is one of the
banks that are are that we use in
Tennessee, and it's one of the ones that
I've used in the past for for personal
stuff that at this point, I barely even
use because of how ridiculous this bank is.
Go ahead and call them out for how
best it's probably the worst bank I've ever
worked with my entire life.
I just I I I don't know what's
happening here as well. This is a new
these are these are things that are popping
up today. I thought it was interesting in
the context of what we're about to get
into about debanking and how prominent that seems
to be right now. So I have got
nonstop problems with this bank where they just
they lock up my account for things I
mean, legitimately things that are on recurring that
I get every month, sometime Amazon or whatever,
just some from something that's to them would
be benign.
Or Cash App or something like that. It's
just just so constant. And I'm talking things
that go through the same day, same amount
every month. And I they they flag me
and lock me for random things. And in
the few times I've had actual fraud, they
never do anything about it, they never catch
it, and I have to deal with it
afterward. Okay. So the point is, today, I
found out my account was locked again,
and I just called them and go through
this process thinking I'm gonna go through the
normal process. Yes. That was my transaction. Yes.
Unlock the card. Thank you. Move on. And
then I always give my little spiel about
how bad they are and how this ever
hit. I don't care. Turns out this time,
it's a little different. And I should've recorded
this from the beginning, but just really briefly
so you can hear the secondary part of
it. It turns out it was not fraud.
And I I just get the sense by
where this goes that it could be something
more. That's all the detail I have, sir.
Since I'm not in that department, I don't
have access to those details. I'm sorry. Well,
no. Give me the details that you do
have. So your department is fraud. Right?
Correct. Okay. So what department is holding it?
Cardholder Services. Okay. So what would that mean?
That would mean it's not fraud?
That it would be in a different department.
I'm not sure if it's fraud related. I'm
not aware of any fraud relation. Well, that's
my point. If it was fraud related, it
would be you that would deal with this.
Right?
I believe so, but I don't wanna give
misinformation.
I really don't know. I don't have full
access to the account. Okay. Well, I mean,
it's so
it goes on from there. The bottom line
point here is that ultimately, she's that you
know, she could tell she didn't wanna answer.
We all know. The point is that was
fraud. So, of course, it could be something
else. Maybe it resolves tomorrow. But I'm concerned
about where this goes. But all of a
sudden, when all this starts happening, all of
a sudden, they it they were it's not
fraud.
It's it's from it's bank it's cardholder services.
They froze in this because of some unknown
if it was an issue, a fraud, fraudulent
charge, that's where it would have been dealt
with. So we'll see. I just think that's
interesting about with what we're about to get
into, and I I really hope this is
not, 1, what is happening to me. 2,
that this
becoming this prevalent. Because we've seen this already.
Right? We've already seen this go,
I mean, from the trucker convoys to a
lot of different dynamics. So let's be clear
about this as we get into the next
point. This is not a uniquely democrat thing.
Like, damn near everything we talk about. It's
just so frustrating how how lazy it is
to just dump it all in one party
and act like that's the only culprit. Like,
not only is that just stupid and completely
inaccurate in most every topic, but it also
allows the problem to continue. And it also
shows that you don't care about the due
diligence. Just dump it just because of the
democrats, because of half of our government and
half of our half of our
country, that's why the problem exists. So I
guess destroy half the government and half the
country and it'll all be okay? Like, what's
the actual logic there? Like, the idea that
you think you could just point at one
part and say they're the responsibility.
Anyway, the point is that you could obviously
realize and show and demonstrate in every one
of these, including this, that there's always a
slant, unless usually how they play the 2
party system against you. But realize that you've
seen these things happen all over the place.
Now on this point, this is the idea
of the debanking discussion, which is popping off
right now, it seems.
This Mark Andresene, of course, this is the
we're gonna get into this in a second.
This
is the, you know, Mark Andresene over part
overlapped many different ways with Peter Thiel and
his projects.
You know, AI. It's all it's he's the
we'll play some clips. He was on Joe
Rogan recently. The one that goes back I'll
I'll read his bio in general for you,
but he has all these interconnections with the
larger problems we're discussing today.
And he says, is debanking one's political enemies
a federal crime?
I mean, it's just a silly well, first
of all, obviously, when you're taking illegal the
point is if they're trying there's there's loopholes
that they create to justify why any number
of illegal actions are not when they do
it. That's typical government for you. But Elon
Musk says, if not, it should be.
You know? Just kinda softballing back and forth.
Let's keep let's make them look like we're
having an engaged conversation. Clearly, I mean, they
probably wrote this out for all we know.
The bottom line is it's obviously a problem,
and, obviously, it's not just a one-sided thing.
Now recently, he came up and said this
on Joe Rogan about this big discussion and
it's all it's spun out into being the
democrats did this, and that's it's as usual.
When a reality or, you know, democrats trying
to take over AI,
which causes what reaction?
Oh, we better hurry and make the good
AI.
It's just
unreal what people will fall for today. But
we'll come back to this in more depth
as we go through this. But I wanted
to point out 2 things.
First of all, this is this year. This
is not new, and it's not American related
and this will it's can be, but Israeli
banks refusing shekel cash deposits from West Bank,
Palestinian officials. So just kind of to highlight
the reality that, you know, the people that
Andrew's seen in the rest of Trump's administration
and tangential people are completely immersed with, are
completely fine debanking people they don't like. And
as Trump is literally telling you that we're
going to do things for Israel, we're going
to censor you because of Israel, we're going
to remove the Jew haters from the country,
I wanna point that one thing on that.
So I'm pretty sure being removed from a
country for having an opinion is a bit
more extreme than de banked. Right? Because at
least you're still in the country. Neither of
them should be okay, and that's the point.
Realize when they're literally telling you they're gonna
remove people from this country, whether or not
it happens
because of an opinion, whatever you think about
that opinion is wild and completely anti American
unconstitutional
or burning the flag or shutting down the
Internet. All these things we've talked about in
the past. The point is recognize that they
are completely intertwined with the very group that
is completely okay with doing these things for
political reasons.
So get ready for the for the shifting
of the tides in the same direction.
Either way, the debanking part is obviously important,
guys. It obviously matters. Now we're gonna come
back to that in a in a point
where where we're gonna come back to this
and get into a conversation about Ukraine
and how that relates to the larger conversation.
But those are things I just wanna point
out to start. I wanna rapidly
go through
some foreign policy
that I think is important just to get
make sure you don't miss this stuff, and
then we're gonna spend the rest of the
time focusing on the main point of today.
And you'll see and you'll see why even
this stuff I do think is important to
quickly point out. Because really, again, we're talking
about Israel here.
And in Israel in regard to Lebanon,
Israel in regard to Gaza.
Let me just do this because this drives
me crazy for the podcast. Just stretch the
window out. There we go.
And and just really, again, it's it's it's
not it doesn't just because Israel has a
clear perspective and action throughout history in a
certain in a certain topic does not therefore
mean that Trump's administration will do the same.
That's not even the point I'm making. But
just recognize that we have the kind of
influence. I mean, on the surface, people like
Hegseth and Huckabee
openly acting like or even Vivek, the divine
right
to be to exist. Who what? That's not
a political statement. That's a religious statement. That's
terrifying stuff. And so when you see this
kind of influence,
and we're gonna come back from the major
point about Miriam Adelson and the funding and
and the ethics pledge and what this means.
Don't forget the point of that. Whether this
very entity is somehow influencing
maybe right this moment
what Trump's administration is doing or having access
to potential classified information,
whether or not they divulge their conflicts of
interest or funding from foreign governments. I mean,
a guy literally running the the ethics dynamic,
I forget his name now, he publicly said
this just a few days ago. They could
be taking money from a foreign government for
all we know. I don't think that was
by accident.
So really just very rapidly so you can
see what's going on because we're gonna get
into this more tomorrow. The Cradle reports
there's another bombing for the World Central Kitchen.
Palestinians were killed and more of their aid
workers were killed
without even a barely any coverage of this.
Just showing you where this is going right
now or the idea that they're sending in
fake aid. And this is, like, the 15th
time I've seen this. Guys, this is literally
sending in bags,
marked sugar, that are full of sand.
I mean and there's I if you if
you're willing to just reject this, you have
not been paying attention, guys. It is not
just we don't we wanna remove them. This
is
this is
villainous.
It's sinister,
malicious.
Also, Sarah Wilkinson has yet again been arrested
for continuing to stand on the right side
of history. That's where this goes. We have
the examples of the ethnic cleansing.
Israeli experts estimate Gaza's reconstruction will cost 100
or $200,000,000,000
to restore to the lowest standard,
which won't happen. It says that that's 575%
to a 100 1100%,
the size of the entire Palestinian economy.
So guess what? Gaza's gone, guys. That's the
reality. They whether they lose
in every other way, they succeeded in doing
this. They have destroyed Gaza to nothing. It
is rubble. It is gone. And apparently, will
never be rebuilt
because they can't. And let's not pretend like
Israel or literally anybody else is actually gonna
step in to do that. But it says,
this is what we mean by genocide. Israel
ensured to be impossible for them to sustain
life for decades to come. That's who we're
dealing with. Daniel McAdams points out I mean,
by and by the way, here are the
people we're talking about. Just 3 Palestinian young
girls
who are struggling and starving in this location.
This is a holocaust that's happening and polite
people, in quotes, don't wanna talk about it.
Just like the last time, only weirdly enough,
the people who were victims last time were
the perps this time.
Also important to point out, and we'll go
through these in-depth in every of these every
one of these topics, the a discussion, all
the rest. I've been telling you most of
this stuff from the very beginning.
Mary Mary's Mary Ag from 972 Magazine, the
Israeli platform, 71%
of Israelis support a hostage deal in exchange
for the end of the war. 71%.
Not because they care about Palestinians in most
cases, which is pretty clear, but because they
want their own family members back and they've
acknowledged that they believe Israel's killing them. How
crazy that is on the surface, and yet
your Western media, Western politicians are just acting
like they don't know. You
must be an antisemite.
Like, that like, we can't see how blindly
they are ignoring the facts from Israel while
pretending like we're racist for pointing them out.
What does that show you? That they're compromised
in whatever way you wanna decide. Not that
you have not that you would my point
is whatever way you might think makes sense,
but we there's only one way. Just that
sounds weird to say it like that. My
point is that you can decide what you
think makes the most sense.
The question is how.
I don't think the question is, are they
compromised? I think this has become so shockingly
obvious
that they're rushing this forward.
Suppress News points out what I've been telling
you for a long time. Simply search Israeli
tear gas. Come to find out that, oh,
look weird how often people die and have
seizures. Clearly, that's not tear gas.
Or battle tested with whatever they've used that
day and sold to American or other despotic
regimes in the world.
This doctor is highlighting the fact
Israel is testing weapons on people in Gaza.
It says that when a person gets within
200, 300 meters of them, they vaporize after
they drop these bombs.
It's crazy what's going on, guys. It's absolutely
wild. And the AI part of it is
just, in my opinion, the most alarming for
where the future goes. But in real time,
these people are being tested on, being bombed,
whether whether biologically or otherwise.
Mary Alba says, wherever we go, we find
corpses on the ground. She's quoting this is
quoting somebody in their article. Some are almost
decomposed, while others have been run over by
Israeli army vehicles.
We're surrounded from all directions and people don't
even know where to go. Totally not genocide,
though. And here's an example that shows you
how dishonest this is. It's it's it's important.
In Gaza,
it says Israeli occupation troops found a Jewish
cemetery
for soldiers that were killed in World War
1. Guess what? Pristine
condition. And you know why we know that
for a for a fact? Because these ridiculous
soldiers decided to make a post about it
acting like it was some kind of a
Trump over the Palestinians when, as he points
out, they didn't even realize that it undermines
their entire propaganda about Hamas.
Right? You're there are no Jews allowed to
live there except that was because Israel forced
them out, which is an easily proven dot
point that we make or and like everything
else, like the origin of Palestine and occupation,
all lies. It's easily proven. The UN covered
it. They made them leave. They honor the
guys. They were unsafe, but that wasn't what
many of them wanted. The point here, in
this case, you can prove that there's a
pristine
Jewish cemetery. Now if this was what we're
told, why would that make sense?
Or
another, this was the IDF a former IDF
chief.
Chief of excuse me. Gen chief of gen
of general staff and defense minister, Moshe Yalan.
Now we've referenced it before. And he himself
has statements you can look up that are
disgusting and horrifying, just so it's clear. But
it says,
the plan
was to quote, conquer, annex, and commit ethnic
cleansing to establish Jewish settlements. Because we know
that. It's amazing that should even be a
contentious statement. But all this is coming out,
and Robert and Lakesh, Israel has murdered over
a 130 Palestinians in Gaza today as the
media ignores it yesterday. The death toll doesn't
account for the populated buildings Israel just polarized.
It never stops.
Talking about Lebanon. Israel has been violating the
ceasefire since it went into effect
on 27th.
Did any is anybody shocked by that? Even
bombing north of the Latani river while repeatedly
firing at people in the south, including documented
examples of firing of journalists, not just Palestinian
journalists or rather whatever the whatever journals they
would deem somehow the bad guys.
At some point, it says the Lebanese resistance
will have to respond because otherwise Israel's pattern
of firing,
when it wants, will continue. Of course, when
they respond, they'll be the one that breaks
the ceasefire. That's how that tends to work.
And realize, guys, this is not even up
for debate. This is not Gaza.
It's it's documented. It's undeniably obvious. Craig Murray,
who's been there, he's on the ground.
Listen to this carefully, he says. The Lebanese
ceasefire agreement is a smoke and mirrors trick
by the US and Israel, which
not that I knew that for a fact,
but it's exactly what I would have bet.
They have no intention of keeping it comparable
to the minx agreements. Meaning that this is
a designed manipulation.
Poison pills, you know, where they pretend like
they're going along with it, but what they
do either
eventually blows up the deal or causes the
other side to react because it was never
going to work based on the what they
put into it, and then they blame them
for
it. Very historically obvious. Ryan Grim points out
I mean, this this is, by the way,
on 26th, the day before the ceasefire. Hours
before it goes in, Israel is carpet bombing
Lebanon. Look at this. All across the city.
That's a vastly populated area.
And it says if you've already Ryan Grim
responds, if you've already agreed to a ceasefire,
you are carpet bombing civilian areas, which is
easily proven by the way, guys, because there
are a few hours until it kicks
in.
You have you are so far gone around
the moral bend, it's hard to see how
you come back.
This isn't just this is just killing for
sport.
It's so obvious it makes my teeth hurt,
guys. It's crazy what we're dealing with here.
Hadi says Israel issued 20 evacuation warnings for
20 buildings
in already evacuated neighborhoods
in Beirut
with no one in them, then went ahead
and bombed a residential building full of families
in a crowded neighborhood without prior warning.
So they could turn around and go, look.
We've warned them all. Except when you do
the math, you look at the actual documents,
they warned about places they didn't bomb. That
happened to Gaza every other day.
But because the corporate media and the western
politicians are liars and bought off manipulators, it
doesn't matter. So press news, breaking Israeli occupation
is now preventing Lebanese returning to their homes
on 28th. So ceasefire, but you can't go
back to the area that we already claimed
we are going to occupy because that's the
truth. Regardless of what ridiculous, childish, blind western
politicians in media are telling you. They have
already posted what the new settlements will be.
Posted the new Hebrew names for the new
settlements and occupied Lebanon. Guys, this is not
a joke, and it's so obvious.
So just like with Gaza, we promise you'll
go back to your homes, then they go,
nope. Now you can't. But it will be
soon. What happened in Gaza? Now they come
out and say, nope. Now you can't forever.
Now this is ours. Because that was the
plan like the former IDF chief told you.
Casey Wright points out, hey. Can someone tell
me why the IDF is using bulldozers in
Lebanon to bulldoze homes and soccer fields? Yeah.
Gee. I wonder why, guys. Can we possibly
fathom a reason? Maybe because like Gaza, they're
just destroying it for their own purposes.
Yeah. Because that's obvious.
Imagine what you could ignore as a Tom
Cotton or a Fetterman or a ridiculous one
of these ridiculous people in in congress who
act like they're America first while actively working
for a foreign government. The cradle. Israeli army
pushes deeper into southern Lebanon
yesterday
as ceasefire violations intensify.
I doubt that will change.
On Syria, briefly, we're gonna get into this
in-depth with with Vanessa tomorrow. I there's nobody
better to talk to about this.
Just realize that right now, this is spinning
off into an this is Syria revolution 2
point o, like, the false flag dynamic.
Same we're gonna point out with Georgia in
a second. These are all popping off at
the same time. And, guys, I believe I
just talked about this. Again, a little bit
ahead of the curve, it seems. Pointing out
that it seems like they're popping off all
these regime changes all over the place for
whatever reason, but it could be distractionary.
We just talked about this. Honduras, I mean,
all over the place. Now Syria, obviously relevant
because of the different crossings, because of
Iranian overlap with the people that they're supporting.
They they that's why they continue to occupy
Syria. They're blocking the different land bridges, the
crossings, where they can put in the most
effective way, transfer weapons to their allies, Which
is only a bad terrorism thing when it's
the people is the US doesn't like. Of
course, when they when the US arms the
most dangerous people on the planet, that's just
defending themselves. Right? But Kevork El Masi, and
you should also check out on this, says
it's no shock that the Qatari owned Al
Jazeera openly supports Al Qaeda terrorists attacking Aleppo.
These are the rebels, apparently, according to the
Western media. After all, Qatar stands as a
key non NATO ally of the United States
and hosts one of the biggest American military
bases. Aaron Mate says the former US ambassador
to Syria Robert Ford acknowledges that, quote, obviously,
the US armed insurgents collaborated with the Al
Qaeda Syria franchise. Now, sir what's happening right
now in a lot of ways is them
starting to admit things that we've been talking
about for decades.
Right? Now, this is happening all over the
place. I'm gonna get into this with the
Trump overlap as well. Or Elon Musk, for
example, where I'm I think a major ploy
right now is to give you a bone
to get you to believe the good thing
are happening, and and that is what is
used to trap you. Think of, like, a
piece of cheese on a rat trap. That's
what we're seeing right now. And I think
that's my opinion, obviously. And even even though
it is a trap at the end of
the day, it's still a positive that something's
being divulged,
but just be skeptical of how that could
be used. I mean, we're seeing it all
over the place with the news dynamic. We'll
get into it in a second. In this
case,
suddenly, we're having the this conversation about Syria.
Now many examples have popped off where they're
saying, yeah. Al Qaeda is basically a proxy
force to the US or basically we funded
them here. You guys should know this by
now. It's public and easy to prove. Why
now are they putting it out there?
But he says, al Nusra has since renamed
itself to Hayat al Sham,
which the math's moderate rebels for you right
there, which has just launched a major offensive
and that threatens capture to capture Aleppo. Now
realize, this is Idlib, guys. As McGurk told
you, the the hot biggest hot spot since
911,
this is what the US controls. And with
Turkey, it's obvious. And I'll tell them for
the rest of them, these are hotspots that
they allow to vester.
And he says, the the a better question
is why Syria has been unable to defeat
this insurgency, one of the most well armed
in world history, which according to US officials
killed over a 100000 Syrian soldiers. Says I
would suggest a different question. That was what
he asked Ford.
Why did ambassador Ford and his colleagues knowingly
cooperate with Al Qaeda dominated insurgency, and do
they feel any responsibility now that Al Qaeda
is gaining more territory?
Of course not. Because, again,
this is a proxy element of the United
States. This is part of the agenda.
Kevork says, I contacted my friends in Aleppo
and they told me that militants of Al
Nusra Front began dismantling decorations and destroying Christmas
trees in the city. Oh, you mean the
trees that we're not supposed to believe exist?
Right? The lies they spin about how this
is totally a Muslim, anti American, anti Christian.
Nope. Not even remotely true. I mean, Syria
had one of the the 3rd largest Christian
population in the Middle East before what was
happening, and they still have a pretty prominent
one. By the way, Gaza too. There's churches.
They just lie to you about all this
stuff. The point is the people of the
US and Israel are pumping into Syria are
the ones destroying Christian things. Just remember that.
Scott Ritter, I'm gonna jump through this. I
wanna get I'm go taking more longer than
I wanted. Richard Medhurst points out, what a
coincidence. Just as a ceasefire begins in Lebanon,
bringing it back into the context of that,
Al Qaeda, meaning Israel, spring back into life
and launch a major offensive in Aleppo. That's
how this stuff works. Aspect to spin up
more anti Arab, anti Muslim converse sentiment, which
then gets mobilized into stopping the ceasefire because
they're fighting against terrorists. That's how this works.
Israeli officials have openly admitted to working with
Al Qaeda to destabilize Syria. They want to
destroy it because it's Lebanon's
logistical
lifeline.
Vanessa Bili. Information on Aleppo from the 25th
Brigade Soldier now in New Aleppo. Quote, this
is 1, videos were made by terrorist sleeper
cells already in Aleppo. That's important. Different conversations
coming from others. I would trust I, you
know, question everything. Do your due diligence, but
I would
hold her information in higher regard than anybody
else. The 25th Brigade under general Saleh Al
Abdallah are reassuring Syrians in Aleppo that the
few terrorists who managed to enter will be
killed or expelled. The breach was a result
of a collapse in the line of defense
at one point. I would argue probably from
internal manipulation.
Aleppo is safe and will never fall. So
that that's the important part to remember. This
was at least on the, 29th, at least
what they're saying anyway.
Russia Medhurst also points out Turkey and the
infamous Syrian rebels turning Syria upside down again.
Funny how they were nowhere to be found
during the last 13 months, yet were always
ready to serve Israel's interest. Same thing we're
always pointing out.
The biggest threat toward democracy until suddenly it's
not interesting, and then we'll look somewhere else
until suddenly they just kinda patiently wait to
be pointed out again.
Think about that. How obvious and often that
happens.
Here's a representative of the United States government
or so we're told. Millions of Syrians have
suffered unthinkable atrocities under a regime that survived
only because of the war criminal Putin and
terrorist Kamini. Oh, you mean the people that
stopped an illegal occupation and destruction of entire
country that would have led to the balkanization
and more of exactly what you guys are
selling to the world? Yeah. What a bad
guy. Now, again, it's not good guy versus
bad guy. Putin and Iran and and Russia
are governments like any other location that we
should be very skeptical of. And with the
same power, I would argue it would end
up in the same place. Regardless of all
of that,
there's truth and there's falsehood.
What's happening in Syria is in every possible
way, an illegal action from outside forces like
US and Israel. That's an ab that's an
objective fact.
They're still occupying it, which is an illegal
thing that Trump
proudly told you was illegal, or at least
explained it and which made sure that it
was seen as illegal. We're there for the
oil and everything else.
The point is that he's trying to reiterate
the same broken narrative that Putin re the
only reason Syria exists today is because,
Putin, specifically, with Russia stopped the continuation of
the agenda. Did they did Putin swing in
and take control?
No.
So at least in this conversation and pretty
much all the rest of them, you can
see that they're lying about what they they're
projecting what they're doing.
That doesn't make him good guy, but it
makes them lying about this dynamic.
And it says they do not want to
be refugees.
They want their homes and communities that butcher
Assad has stolen. Oh, now we're talking about
stealing homes and land?
Gee, Joe Wilson, when's the last time you
pointed at what Palestine is what's happening in
Palestine? When's the last time you pointed out
what the US government's doing in occupying Afghanistan,
which, by the way, is still part of
the story, I'll point it out in a
second. Or in Syria, or in Iraq, or
anywhere else they're currently illegally occupying and stealing
territory from or about Prospera and Honduras and
stealing more territory there. We'll talk about that
too. The point
is that there are obvious discussions to be
had about the people that are no longer
in Syria because of the US government.
But it's Assad's fault that US government destabilized
the whole country for the agenda of overthrowing
their government and putting one in place that
they like? But, yeah, let's play Assad for
the fake allegations of chemical weapons. I mean,
these people are children
or blindly dishonest.
Eramate says, well, this was how the stable
takeover worked the last time. Because he's one
of these people putting forward the idea that
that's what we need right now. Right? Here's
another one. A stable takeover of parts of
Northern Syria by opposition groups would allow for
voluntary repatriation of large numbers of refugees.
Basically, allowing our side to win will cause
peace. These people are the same tired narrative.
And Aaron says, this is what happened last
time. US backed, quote, moderate rebels behead a
child near Aleppo.
Very prominent story.
Lastly,
in regard to
the obvious point of the US funding these
elements and Israel, Rachel Blevins points out Iran's
foreign minister reportedly described the attacks by the
Islamist group Hayat al Sham on Northwestern Syria
as, quote, an American Zionist plot. Cause that's
what it is. Noting that they followed a
ceasefire deal with Hezbollah. Now I'm not saying
that because that's what Syria that's that's because
it's objectively the reality, whoever said it. Meanwhile,
the West is trying to make Syrian rebels
happen again
as well. And and the main point here
is that it seems to be stripping out
all over that these are proxy elements. Now
this is specifically about Ukraine, but it's the
same point. Boris Johnson here saying, let's let's
let's mate let's face it. We're waging a
proxy war.
What?
It's the truth, but why are they saying
this right now? And Caitlin says for years
it was Kremlin propaganda
to call it a western proxy war against
Russia. Now the line is, well, this is
obviously a proxy war, so we need to
give our proxies weapons. Like, they're they're desperate.
That's what that shows to me. We see
it. It's falling apart. No one's buying it,
so they just
take a step further. Well, they're on our
side. You can't let them die. They're our
side because good side.
30 seconds ago, we weren't involved, and this
this proxy war means it is the United
States. It is the UK. It is Israel.
That's the point. And now they're telling you
that. I it's just crazy. So the question
is why?
And the bigger point, and this is an
older article, but this is what's happening right
now, as I'll play for you in a
second. But the squirrel points out, Times of
Israel from 2019.
IDF chief finally acknowledges that Israel supplied weapons
to Syrian rebels, as well as gave them
medical treatment. These are all very public. This
is from Israeli media.
So whether you think they're created by them,
they're very clearly arming them.
Wyatt Reid pointing out the same thing, giving
you multiple articles to demonstrate the fact that
we know this.
Syrian girl points out Al Qaeda terrorists tell
Israeli Channel 1,
quote,
we are grateful to Israel for targeting the
positions of Hezbollah and weakening them.
This is on Israeli TV, by the way.
Or Lorbibo.
Again, why all of a sudden that this
is okay to point out from these kind
of Republican main influencer channels, which before wasn't
you know, it's interesting to me what is
being allowed to be dripped out through these
kind of platforms.
The point here is that we've shown you
which it says, yes. But the older person
says down here, wait. Are we playing there's
no Nazis in Ukraine again?
And they go, yes. But now it's called
there's no ISIS in Idlib. Yeah. You mean,
like, the fat the story that's been going
on forever?
I get so frustrating with these partisans that
sort of
like, you know, this is not a new
story, and this is not a an adapt
adaptation of the Ukraine story. The Ukraine part
was an adaptation of this from before. Either
way, the reality is, guys, there's ISIS patches
all over these people. It's the same thing
in Israel. It's the same thing in Ukraine.
Why? Because it's all part of the same
agenda.
Because the Israeli and US governments have been
funding and radicalizing these elements for as long
as you can look. They have been funding
the most radical elements of everything they claim
they're fighting that you and you can easily
prove this stuff.
Here is Richard Black, former Virginia state senator.
Here's what he has to say. Ask yourself,
why in the world this is suddenly being
stated? TIDA has always been our proxy,
force on the ground.
They, together with ISIS,
have carried out the mission of the United
States.
We are supporters of Al Qaeda today
where they're bottled up in Idlib province.
We wanted to starve
and we wanted to freeze to death
the people of Syria.
We wanted to take the wheat away to
cause famine
among the Syrian people. There was a campaign
of rape. It was an organized campaign of
rape across the nation of Syria.
The highest
prices
went to the youngest children
because there were great number of pedophiles
and the pedophiles wanted to possess small children.
We
cut off the medical supplies so that the
women
in Syria would die of breast cancer because
they could not get the medications.
Thank you, guys. Sorry. I didn't see I
was muted. So all I was saying is
that ultimately the point
you could check this out for yourself, it's
about 9 minutes long, and and it goes
into a lot of different stuff. Now, what
I was saying is that what it's not
I'm not making the argument because he says
this.
Why are you saying that you can decide
for yourself? The facts are obvious. And I'll
include James Corbett's amazing work on this or
rather our watch along of his 3 part
documentary, which give you the receipts and all
the source material to make an undeniable case
that this is a proxy element of Israel
in United States. Clearly,
the question is why are they suddenly telling
you that? Like I like I said when
it was muted that maybe it's a planned
demolition to blame on Israel. I don't know.
But just recognize that this is important to
see. You know, here is the classic example
from Hillary Clinton.
The emails that got released. Right? Where it
says,
Al Qaeda is on our side in Syria.
Yep.
Otherwise, things have basically turned out as expected.
All this is gonna be in front of
you and you still we still get lied
to by politicians or partisans. Now lastly, in
Georgia, the country. As says Patrick Henningsen, once
again, Georgia, which by the way, make sure
you follow him. Check out his work. He's
doing amazing work. EU Soros and CIA have
flown into pro democracy demonstrators. They just have
the guys, they literally have play 1, 2,
and 3. They do they seem to do
the same things over and over.
So now in Georgia, guess what? We have
a pro democracy revolution against the bad guy
Russia and everybody else involved. And as it
says, resisting Moscow, Iran, North Korea.
And he says, in order to form yet
another contrived color evolution on Russia's borders, Right
obviously, re obvious reasons right now. And hoping
to wreck another country as they've done already
in Ukraine. Unhinged Eurofascist
guy,
Verhosstad,
is tasked by Brussels with promoting regime change
in EU NATO countries' standard playbook.
I agree.
On top of that, Dan McAdams points out
just exactly I'd even add this person even
says the Newland packages of cookies is to
ask yourself, who is funding this attempted overthrow
of the duly elected government in Georgia? All
these goodies just appeared out of nowhere. And
what are they? Cookies and gas masks.
Because that makes sense. Right? Is there any
immediate threat of of using chemical? I mean,
well, maybe that's what they plan. There's no
reason to hand out gas masks other than
that that's what they it's meant to give
you a narrative and thought.
And just on ending the segment in general,
it's same point, guys. I find all these
governments to be just as problematic because I
think government in general is the problem.
But that's so it's not to say good
guy, bad guy, but objectively looking at the
reality of the last 40 years.
As GlobalEye News says, China says the United
States is the number one warmonger in the
world. Now if you debate that,
you're a liar.
You can argue China is just as bad
and would be if they were at the
level you could argue the point is that,
objectively,
you can see the amount of death, the
amount of occupation, the amount of bombing, the
amount of rape, torture, and destabilization
that the US government has been committing as
far back as you wanna look.
That doesn't have to be a all encompassing
argument. I think there's plenty of good things
in even with earlier aspects of this, but
specifically with the people of the country.
But as the as as Ashok writes, China
hasn't dropped the bomb in 40 years, which
I don't that's not accurate. But at the
point of, like, in the context of US
foreign policy.
They have not dropped a bomb on another
country in the context of any even even
a fraction of what you're seeing the US
government do in 40 years. The US has
dropped a bomb, on average, every 40 minutes
for the last 40 years. I'm willing to
bet you it's actually far higher than that.
So the point is to just sit back
and recognize,
or rather just to acknowledge that we have
a government that rules in your name that
is actively
the most demon the the most,
destructive force
in the world.
It's important to make sure we're honest about
that like we are with the rest of
these conversations. Lastly,
Insurrection Barbie says, can someone please explain to
me why we have $48,000,000,000
in Afghanistan since he pulled out of there?
They've sent that much money.
How long have I been telling you this,
guys? And he goes, wow. We spent that
much? Wow.
Yeah. Because we're still invested and involved. What's
going on? My god. I think it's crazy
that we can't acknowledge the obvious nature of
the US government does not move themselves from
anywhere.
Like, Trump fame we defeated ISIS. We pulled
out of Syria. No. None of those actually
happened. Same point here. A lot of narrative
was spun around whether I look. Troops were
removed. But you think for one second, the
US government did not maintain some level of
influence and control of what's going on? That's
what they do.
And whether it's mercenary groups like Blackwater Academy,
whatever, guys. So just think about the willful
ignorance of a lot of this conversation.
And Patrick also points out the notorious white
helmets.
The theater group is back in business. Looks
their production budget has been cut, but not
many extras are the point is that
back in, Aleppo. All of a sudden, the
white helmets are back on the scene.
We can't can we not piece that together?
Syria didn't stop existing over this time period,
but suddenly now they're back. There's been other
disasters.
It's because the US propaganda machine is back,
or the US Israeli propaganda machine.
So I think those things are important to
make sure you saw. We'll go into more
depth
tomorrow.
Let's get back to
the main point of today.
Now,
this kinda meant to bring us back from
from the same conversation, foreign policy.
But it brings us into the point of
the border.
Right? And the idea of of
biometrics,
the artificial intelligence overlap. But first, I just
wanna start with this point about the same
idea of war.
Alex Jones puts this out and says, global
peace alert. You know, normally, it says, world
war 3 alert when it's about anybody else.
Trump set to announce plan to end the
Ukraine war, which I don't it's you tell
me what you think on this, guys. I
keep seeing these these,
you know, breaking news for Alex Jones where
he cites these things. I'm like, okay. Where
is this happening? Meetings at Mar a Lago
to end 30 you know, to do everything
he ever promised in his lifetime. Like, okay.
Well, where is the evidence of this stuff?
Like, I have no doubt they're meeting and
talking,
and I'm sure Alex Jones has insight into
some level or believes he does.
But what's funny to me is that we're
talking about, again, an entity that is not
in power. And so all of this seems
to be a little bit in in the
idea that they're about to carry out some
action with NATO, and then all of a
sudden the democrats are fighting to stop that
action from happening. It's like, where is any
of this happening right now? Now let's be
clear. It's not even up for debate this
stuff could be happening.
But I find it interesting that this is
being floated. It's almost like we're seeing and
resolving these things before we ever even prove
they're happening. I find that to be hilarious.
But this one is about the part of
Ukraine. So ending the war. Any no matter
how that happens, that should be a good
thing. Right? But the point is even if
it happens in a way that leads us
to another problem, we have to be honest
about that. But here's what he says. Promises
to end this war by forcing a ceasefire,
which doesn't really make sense, first of all.
Forcing a ceasefire is not the way to
a peaceful resolution because that doesn't mean there
was a resolution. It means you forced something
in the case. But on top of that,
and
stationing Western troops in Ukraine. Okay.
So a deployment of more US troops on
foreign soil
of a group that we are clearly involved
with is a proxy war as they're all
admitting, and that's ending the war?
You think that so so the the further
encroachment of US occupation in this is gonna
be what Putin goes, okay. Good. Now we
can resolve it. You realize the entire reason
this is happening is because of the violation
of crossing red lines from the NATO encroachment
to
point after point after point. Arming the ever
ever we've gone over these a 1000 times
over. Whether we're talking about the continual support
for the Azov movement,
they have crossed red lines everywhere.
But let's pretend like putting more troops in
Ukraine somehow signifies a positive change.
Yeah. He says they are they are because
this is supposed to be any establishment.
So here's the some of the comments they
said that I thought were interesting. Now first
of all, this guy makes an interesting point.
I can't tell whether this is his mind
a positive or negative.
To me, this is a very, very big
negative. So let's just say they do find
some kind of a deal. Right? Let's just
say for whatever reason, maybe because Putin and
Russia are not on a adversarial side to
this as much as we may think,
decides to go along with this.
And they decide to have some kind of
a cease fire, and then Zelensky does as
he told because he's a puppet.
And then guess what? Like, a North Korea
dynamic, well, all of a sudden, they've got
a UN controlled
demilitarized
zone.
So let me ask you something, which which
by the way would be the kind of
the obvious step in this because, both side
want what was take so they would step
in and try to mediate that. That's usually
how this works with some kind of UN,
you know, the international body dynamic.
Okay? So is that what the anti globalists
want?
Or of course, the point would be Trump
wouldn't allow that because we somehow know that
even though we clearly do not.
Or that he would somehow control the process
that he initiates if that is the case,
which he would not. The point is that
this is likely what would happen.
So all it amounts to is more international
body
governance.
More globalist control of more territory.
But that's a good thing as long as
Trump makes it happen. Right?
Now, clearly, you can see the beginning of
where this goes today with the focal point.
That all of these things, under the guise
of a positive step, actually drive into a
position that goes in the wrong direction.
Or at least I see that happening or
potentially happening. And I really just hope you'll
at least ask the question about the ones
that we have yet to see happen yet.
But there are already examples of this going
on. So I find that to be interesting.
Just think about that and look at the
bigger the huge slot the area of land,
which by the way I argue is probably
chock full of all the important locations.
Wouldn't be by accident.
Also, this person says now I mentioned this
earlier. I was on Jason Burmish's show this
morning. He says, okay. So Biden sending troops
to World War to Ukraine, World War 3,
which he's already made a case for. He's
already made that statement. Trump sending troops to
Ukraine, world peace.
Got it. So the only difference is because
you believe Trump has different intentions.
Certainly
could. Still announced to more occupation, more troops
on the ground, which will probably never go
away, which by the way, is already happening.
I hope you get the point, how obvious
this is. And whether he is kind of
naively buying into it or trying to deceive
you, those are the options I think. And
I simply said, we can't be this stupid.
We just can't evolve for these things over
and over. Now I wanna play this even
though it's 6 minutes just because it's important
to hear, and this also broadens this out
to a larger dynamic that is not partisan.
That the Ukraine manipulation has been going on
long before Biden's administration.
And it very clearly existed throughout Trump's administration.
But it's not about Biden or Trump. It's
about the US government
using these dynamics to manipulate you.
This is not an attack
by Putin
on Ukraine in the way that we are
told every day.
This started in 1990,
February 9,
1990.
James Baker the third, our secretary of state,
said to Mikhail Gorbachev,
NATO will not move 1 inch eastward
if
you
agree to German unification,
basically ending World War 2.
And,
Gorbachev said that's very important. Yes.
NATO doesn't move, and we agreed to German
unification.
The US then cheated on this
already starting in 1994
when Clinton signed off on a,
basically,
a plan to expand NATO all the way
to Ukraine.
This is when the so called neocons
took power.
And,
Clinton was the first agent of this.
And
the expansion of NATO started in 1999
with Poland, Hungary, and Czech Republic.
At that point, Russia didn't much care. There
was no border other than with the Konigsberg,
but other than that, there was no direct
threat.
Then,
the US,
led the bombing of Serbia in 1999.
That was bad, by the way,
because that was a
use of NATO
to bomb a European
capital, Belgrade,
78
straight days to break the country apart.
The Russians didn't like that very much.
But Putin became president. They swallowed it. They
complained. But,
even Putin started out,
pro,
European,
pro American, actually, asked maybe we should join
NATO,
when there was still the idea of some
kind of mutually
respectful relationship.
Then 911
came,
then came,
Afghanistan,
and the Russian said, yeah. We'll support you.
We understand to root out terror.
But then came 2 other decisive
actions.
In 2002,
the United States unilaterally
walked out of the anti ballistic missile treaty.
This was probably
the most decisive event,
never discussed in this context.
But what it did was trigger
the US putting in missile systems
in Eastern Europe
that Russia views as a dire direct threat.
In 2,004,
5,
we engaged in a soft
regime So even thus far, imagine all of
these lines being crossed and what the US
and Israel would have already done by now.
I don't even need to explain further.
In change operation in Ukraine.
But in 2009,
Yanukovych
won the election and he became president, and
in 2010
on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine.
That calmed things down because
the US was pushing NATO, but the people
of Ukraine on the opinion polls didn't even
wanna be a NATO. They knew that the
country is divided between ethnic Ukrainian, ethnic Russian.
What do we want with this? We wanna
stay away from your problems.
So in February 22nd
2014,
the United States participated
actively in the overthrow of Yanukovych.
A typical
US regime change operation,
have no doubt about it. And the Russians
did us a favor, they intercepted
a really ugly call between Victoria Nuland, my
colleague at Columbia University now,
between her
and,
the US ambassador
to Ukraine, Jeffrey Piatt, who's a senior state
department official till today.
And they talked about regime change.
They said, who's gonna be the next government?
All of this is to say,
the US then said,
okay. Now NATO's really gonna enlarge. And Putin
kept saying, stop. You promised no NATO enlargement.
It's been, by the way, I forgot to
mention in 2004,
Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia,
Slovenia,
7 more countries
in the not 1 inch eastward.
And then
okay. It's a long story, but
the US
kept rejecting
the basic idea,
don't expand
NATO
to Russia's border in a
context where we're putting in goddamn
missile systems
after breaking a treaty.
2019,
we walked out of the Intermediate Nuclear Force
Treaty.
On December 15,
2021,
Putin put on the table
a draft
Russia US security agreement.
You can find it online.
The basis of it is no NATO enlargement.
I called the White House
that
next week after that
begging them, take the negotiations.
Putin's offered something. Avoid this war.
Oh, Jeff, there's not gonna be a war.
Announce that NATO's not gonna enlarge. Oh, don't
worry. NATO's not gonna enlarge. I said,
oh, you're gonna have a war over something
that's not gonna happen?
Why don't you announce? And he said, no.
No. Our policy is an open door. This
is Jake Sullivan.
Our policy is an open door policy.
Open door for NATO enlargement.
That is under the category of bullshit, by
the way.
You don't have your right to put your
military bases anywhere you want and expect peace
in this world.
They turned down the negotiations.
Then
the special military operation started.
And 5 days later, Zelensky says, okay. Okay.
Neutrality.
And then the United States and Britain said,
no way.
You guys fight on.
We got your back.
We don't have your front. You're all gonna
die.
But we got your back
as we kept pushing them into
the front lines. That's
600,000
deaths
now of Ukrainians since Boris Johnson flew
to Kyiv to tell them to be brave.
Here is a clip
before I read what Patrick said
of a Ukrainian general in 2014
telling you now I'm not gonna I'll I'll
read the parts that I think are relevant
before the podcast. Just make sure you check
out the video
of him telling you that Israeli involvement, all
the things we talked about.
All there for you. Now as Patrick writes,
we can all agree that Ukraine is a
disaster for the west. Hence, question 1, why
hasn't Jeffrey Sachs been been on a short
list for a top cabinet position for the
Trump administration?
Very good. You know, there's plenty of criticisms
I would have about other points, but realize
that if we're talking about choosing the best,
right, not the lesser of evils, which is
this game that we play. Right? It's
actually, a great point that Jason made in
our conversation today is that somebody argued that
no matter where you go, you're always gonna
be in a position of lesser or evils.
And, again, I argued very clearly that's that's
ridiculous.
There that you could argue that we have
the person who may have less
conflicts or problems or or, you know, issues,
But you're talking about people that are simply
not as good versus people at the bottom
of the spectrum that are not as that
are you know? Like, as he said, between
benevolent and evil is a huge chasm of
people in there. And argue that all we
can pull from are these
swamp creatures that are just not as bad.
It's it's just I think it's one of
the most obvious manipulations we've ever fallen for.
And so right now, you have Jeffrey Sachs
who's clearly
saying things across the board that are that
most of the Republicans seem to agree. Where
is he? Or any number of other people
that are objectively better than 99% of who
he's
picking. Question 2. Can you name one of
Trump's picks so far who have at least
half of the foreign policy IQ of Sachs?
You can't.
Now just like other examples we made, this
is another example from the media perspective. Right?
Using the idea that we want something different.
The media is broken, the corporate media as
well as the mainstream alternative media, which is
just an extension of the mainstream alternative mainstream
media.
Very
clearly, very clearly a propaganda tool. Very clearly
not what we are always pretending.
That does not mean then what we need
to do is shift it into some broader
like, to make the point. Using that that
we want that we see as a problem
because now the state and don't ring it
this entire time until suddenly now there's a
next step that they want as the controlling
factions.
And so now they point to the problem
in order to coax you into the new
control structure.
Elon facts says, Elon Musk is the future
on the future of the media. And he
quotes and you've heard this everywhere. Even though
this has been a statement by independent media,
genuine independent media, for a decade now. Right?
That that you are the media. Anybody out
there who wants to be the media is
the media. Because you're on Twitter with Musk
high fiving you, but that anybody anywhere that
wants to be, you're a journalist.
That's the first amendment. That supreme court has
roundly ruled that.
But he writes, quote, the cumulative voice of
the people should decide what is newsworthy.
Oh, okay. So isn't that mob rule?
Isn't that just democracy,
which we shouldn't want? Yes. That's exactly what
he's highlighting. But he says it good. Right?
The idea being that what we should do
is bow to the mob's opinion, Which, by
the way, is exactly what we currently deal
with. Because the mob is easily manipulatable,
like he's demonstrating for you. So, no, it
should not be what the mob decides. It
should be what you decide.
Who cares what your neighbor thinks? Who cares
I mean, in some context, it matters. I
care what people think. But in the context
of deciding what you believe is true or
what you think is newsworthy, are we really
pretending like that's a binary thing?
Or rather not binary, but just static thing.
It is
constantly everybody has a different opinion. So it's
always and this is what they this is
what this new ploy is meant to hide
from you. It's not about what the mob
or anybody else thinks, but what you think.
You decide. You do the research. You do
your due diligence, and you come to your
own conclusions. They're so afraid of that. Why?
Because it leads to where we are right
now.
That's why people objectively
nonpartisan stuff is completely it is the most
shadowbanned out there.
The cumulative voice of the people should decide.
Individually, you should decide what you think is
correct. Whether you find it on Twitter, on
MSNBC,
or Fox News, it's up to you to
decide based on what you can prove, what
you can do your diligence around. But this
is the game of ship shipping you away
or manipulating you away from the current mob
rule dynamic into the illusion of the new
positive mob rule dynamic.
In other cases
and, like, may like, they keep hearing that
you are the media now, as in or,
like, Twitter is the media. No. Twitter is
just a platform. It is a medium. You
can share cat videos or you can share
something you think is news.
That doesn't make x the media. That's the
way they keep trying to frame this. It's
like saying, your microwave now, I've made all
I've made these jokes many times. It is
just a medium for it and anything can
go through it.
So
important to consider that that is about wherever
you wanna post it. You are. Not Twitter.
In this case, it's not what the mob
thinks. But another example,
the artificial intelligence point, which is one of
the most transparently obvious in all of this.
Elon Musk shares this. And he didn't explicitly
say this, but I thought it was a
good point to make on the back of
it. He says, grok versus chat chat g
p t.
Right? So that's the kind of fake binary
as always. And we that's one of the
early panels we did with the IMA. The
fake binary,
fake duopoly, whatever term we used. And he
goes, the difference is revealing on so many
levels. And of course, this is from the,
you know, our side of this is good.
Their side is partisan liar stuff, when really
it just means our side is slanted to
the right, theirs is slanted to the left,
and we like our right side better. So
you're both ridiculous. The point is clearly, it
is
all about what gets put into it. And
the data they put in is the data
they like, so the return they get is
what they like.
It's it's a self fulfilling prophecy. I I
always like the news sites to tell me
what I wanna hear. Yep. Well, here's the
point.
I said, as you guys already know it's
coming. I said, yeah, guys. We better demand
the good artificial intelligence created by the good
Zionist technocrat military contractor billionaire. Otherwise, we are
doomed.
Hashtag we can't be this stupid. Let's get
that going. Because realize that if we're really
trying to pretend like it's one verb, how
about we don't want any of it? How
about we recognize the very clear pitfalls of
technocrats and billionaires and oligarchs and Zionists
creating this technocratic panopticon around us? You can
decide for yourself about what this is. The
my point though is using what we want
to trap us into a new manipulation.
Derek put out an excellent article today.
Meet the spyware companies preparing to unleash their
tech during Trump's second term. Now, obviously, this
does not have to mean that Trump is
the culprit or responsible or aware.
So first, just recognize this is what's going
on.
And if Trump's in per in a position
of power, then this is either whether he's
not aware it hap of it's happening, which
I think is impossible,
or as a part of it.
Either way, it's not about Trump or Biden
or it's about the US government and what
they continue to do and has been happening
as far back as you wanna look. We're
watching the tech the the technology
finally meet the technocratic agenda.
As he writes, in late September, the US
and what this overlaps with is the border,
the conversation of using and, really, the most
terrifying part for me in all this is
the very clear overlap of Israeli spyware and
Israeli intelligence apparatus
and ICE.
So as we're continuing to talk about this
border possible weaponized immigration manipulation,
and we're talking about Israeli influence and propaganda
and, like, Israeli intelligence psyops everywhere,
if you haven't realized by now that they
have multiple contracts through Israeli tech startups with
ICE and and wonder whether that could be
at least in some way driving to the
manipulation
or allowing
it's it's amazing the blind spot that has
to do with Israel. But it says in
late September, the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement,
ICE, signed a $2,000,000
1 year contract with controversial
Israeli spyware vendor, peg Paragon
Solutions.
Whitney's written a lot about in the past
around NSO Group and Pangasys. There's a lot
of these. And one I believe was Troka
is one she recently talked about. The point
as Barrick has been highlighting is whether or
not you think that the this solution is
needed for the border versus something else, it
will amount to more dystopian,
technocratic,
invasive control over your life.
And it's not just as I'll play the
clip in a minute. Not just about people
on the border, as Trump tells you. Maybe
I'll just play it. I'll bring it up
at least now. But Trump tells you it's
about on air, water, and sea,
which is not just about one dynamic, guys.
And I think what's important is even if
it is just the border, which I don't
that's not what I believe it'll be.
It's showing you how broad it ultimately so
anybody that goes to the border, if that's
even just the case, including Americans coming and
going.
Come leaving or, you know, coming and leaving.
Let's see. I had that in there somewhere.
Hold on.
There it is.
Or maybe I'll grab it while I'm playing
something. I'm certain we've played that a 1000000
times.
There it is.
So I'll just play it now since we
waited. Hurry.
We will finally complete
the biometric
entry exit visa tracking system, which we need
desperately.
On the guise of stopping the bad guy,
evil immigrants. Right? I mean, in reality, the
point being that these are people simply being
used.
So why would they be the enemy?
Why would that the focal point should be
what's causing this to happen. Well, one of
those is reflecting and realizing it's US foreign
policy. Secondarily, I think it's obviously being manufactured
to drive us into exactly where we are
right now.
Again, the point obviously then being that none
of these people should be the focal point
of your outrage and anger. They're just random
people being manipulated.
And then if you think throughout that, there's
some kind of an out outward force,
military age males and all that, well, then
recognize where it's coming from and stop blaming
them for being the the crowd around them
that are not part of that manipulation. It
is a foreign entity. You're damn right. It's
Israel.
For years, congress has required
biometric
entry, exit visa tracking systems,
but it has never been completed. The politicians
are all talk Because, technically, we haven't had
I don't think we've technologically been able to
truly make this happen until so many so
many last years. I think that's why. No
action never happens.
Never happens.
Hillary Clinton,
all talks. Unfortunately,
when there is action, it's always the wrong
decision. Do you ever notice?
In my administration,
we will ensure that this system is in
place.
And I will tell you, it will be
on land,
it will be on sea, It will be
in air. We will have a proper tracking
system.
Yeah. Pretty sure that's not what Republicans want.
Unless, you know, the I the guys being
only aimed at the the evil brown people
coming from south. Right? The idea that it
won't be that way. It'll be aimed at
everybody. That's how this works. And if we
haven't learned that by now from the Patriot
Act and whatever else they use under the
guise of fighting the evil villains that were
provably pointed at you the entire time, I
don't think that people that I think most
people are becoming aware of that realize the
ones that don't see it or pretend they
don't are the ones that I don't think
care about the outcome at all. I think
they're fighting for their status quo benefits in
the moment
or are invested in the agenda at large.
But it says to continue the contract with
Paragon Solutions involves Paragon's US subsidiary based in
Chantley, Virginia and ICE's Homeland Security Investigations Division
3. It says as Paragon claims its tools
can help law enforcement and governments remotely crack
encrypted messaging platforms like WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal, and
Face Facebook Messenger. So ask yourself even this.
So just because this person may be here
illegally,
why does that give them the right to
hack their phone or their their not even
just their phone, their apps to find out
what they were saying?
I mean, guys, it's you have to realize,
and I've made this point so many times
over the years, even an illegal immigrant here
against the law is still, in many ways,
protected under the US constitution. This has been
roundly proven by the Supreme Court. I could
bring up 40 articles about it. Even though
you usually get the pushback from people that
say that's not true because they don't want
to see the they see them as the
outside.
The point is that you you go back
to the history, the origin point of, you
know, bring us your tired, your poor. Like,
that's the whole it's amazing how quickly we
got away from the that the idea that
we're all about the melting pot and whatever
else. Whether you ever believed in that, the
point is that was clearly the narrative.
And so now you have people coming through,
and they're now justifying
wildly invasive surveillance
and and and monitoring
technology
that will be aimed at you because of
this exact point.
If this was about you, you'd be pushing
back on this. Right? So we should be
having the same point. It's about principle.
Now it gets crazy when you realize that
this company is an Israeli spy company. Now
it says within weeks of the ICE paragon
contract becoming public, Wired reported on the contract
that was under review by the White House
to see if it violates an executive order,
specifically 14093.
And it was signed by Joe Biden, in
fact, in March 2023 as part of an
ongoing US government effort
specifically aimed at restricting the use of commercial
spyware by US agencies.
Of course, it went forward anyway. The EO
says the US government will continue to promote
the responsible
use of spyware that aligns with promoting democratic
values. Clearly, that's what we can see happening.
Right?
That's just all their their flowery words that
hide their disgusting,
tortured, you know, right whether the right way
to frame that. The flowery words hiding their
grotesque nature.
Now it says the Biden administration has also
made efforts to impact the commercial spyware market,
including placing spyware vendors like Israeli firm NSO
Group and Intelexa
on the entity list which prevents any US
companies from doing business with them. So don't
you think we'd learn our lesson? Because again,
being facetious because I don't think it's about
trying to learn your lesson. I think it's
about trying to make it look like we
care about those things.
Yet another Israeli company been exposed as manipulating,
and lying, and cheating, and stealing. You it's
we'll block them. And now work with the
new Israeli start up company. It's just so
blatantly obvious.
The point is these are our list, and
we'll just go through this article, which highlight
as as Whitney's covered a lot over the
years, what the NSO Group is responsible for.
It's it is a spy agency that's been
caught for manipulation as well as using technology
to get to despotic regimes that are used
against journalists and politicians and innocent civilians.
And you can prove this ties back to
the Israeli government, but here we are using
the new one. Because it's they're not confused
about this. The Biden and Trump administrations are
very aware of what this group is doing.
They don't care.
Now it says following the wired report, the
New York the New Yorker reported in early
November that
oh, wait.
The Biden White House has also mounted a
visa restriction policy for individuals, quote, who have
been involved in the development
and sale of commercial spyware or who are
immediate family members of those involved. Think about
that.
So you're telling me that you we're not
worried about using the new Israeli start up
company, tech in invasive
spy spyware, which is probably just the extension
of the same program with a new name?
And yet, you have created a whole thing
to stop these from being used in the
United States as well as anybody
restricting the visas of anybody even tangentially involved
through through family, familiar how do you say
that? Familiarly
for for a familiar link involved.
That's that I mean, that shows me at
least some level they're aware of the infiltration
of all of this. Now it says following
a wired report,
this is a source at at Paragon, the
spyware company, told me to the New Yorker
that the deal follow it followed a vetting
process during which the company was able to
demonstrate that it had robust tools to prevent
other countries
that purchases spyware from hacking Americans.
But in bold,
that wouldn't limit the US government's ability to
target its own citizens. And when you realize
that in their own documentation over the last
20 years, they've made it clear that you
are their problem,
that should be concerning for you.
Especially when you realize that they may be
acting out for another country that has nothing
to do with your interest. But it says,
by October 31st,
more than 30 civil society and digital rights
organizations
and spyware experts signed a letter, which seems
to happen every time these days and nobody
cares, which calls on the Department of Homeland
Security to release the details about the $2,000,000
contract with Paragon.
I guarantee they don't care about that. The
point is the people that have it their
job is to be concerned about the exactly
the things we're talking about, 30 different groups
called this out.
Just like we saw with the past discussions,
the I mean, the only time I've ever
seen that have an effect was with the
and maybe this was by design, was the
the insect allies conversation. We're scientists the world
around. We're like, guys, that's a bioweapon. We
all know it. And they quietly put it
away and then popped back up in the
form of a shot. What do you know?
But it says, we are seriously concerned that
this contract may not comply with EO 14093
and may lead to violations
of both domestic and international law.
Which they obviously don't care about the law
at all. The letter notes that the contract
with Paragon relates to Homeland Security Investigations with
ICE,
quote, suggesting that HSI, Homeland Security Investigations,
is the primary intended user of graphite, which
is the the
the the specific name of the thing they're
worried about. It says Graphite is Trojan horse
software
developed by Paragon that can extract data from
encrypted messaging apps like WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, Signal,
and Telegram.
Why is any of this even on the
table?
These are spoke these are privacy issues.
Even criminals still have rights. Like, the idea
they can now just go, well, we don't
like what you and you have to realize
that we're not talking in in almost most
cases about people that are being charged or
have been charged. Or rather, not even just
charged, proven to have painted a crime. We're
talking about people that are alleged to have.
And that's one of the largest points in
all of this. All of this is being
set up, as you're gonna see in a
minute, for the incoming mass deportation discussion.
And we already know that this is gonna
be used in a way that is we
we think that's the case.
Right? You look like an immigrant.
Your papers aren't lined up. And if all
of a sudden, you're gonna be hacked and
inflamed, realize this is what your government already
does.
This is the illusion of process. They this
is if this oh, and by the way,
this is an overstep. This is already happening
to you.
We can prove that. Whether from Israel or
the United States.
But this is about,
I think,
putting a cap on it. Like, officially
making this policy and truly now we live
in the system where that is always happening,
which by the way, I think it already
is, but this is about driving this forward
and taking newer steps. The New York Times
reported in December 2022 that the US DEA
had already made use of graphite. That's the
point. It's already happening. This is about driving
you into a new stage of this under
the rationale that it's the bad guys coming
in from other places. Now it says Paragon
claims
that it limits distraction of information from targeted
devices, quote, to conversations on chat apps, and
that it, quote, works solely with police forces
and intelligence agencies that meet the standards of
an enlightened democracy.
We should all chuckle at that, which includes
only 39 countries.
Right? That's
the the world agrees is the ones they
like. Right? It's like usually by the way,
that's not even the majority. Let's make sure
we understand that.
So the interesting part, the enlightened democracies you
know you know why they say that today?
Because it's been so thoroughly exposed
that the groups they would love for you
to believe are just, like, barbarians in caves
are now they call them limited democracies.
Well, if you wanna understand the overlap and
look at what the US and Israel are,
it's a flat out laughable joke that they
even pretend that these comp groups are democracy
at all, and whether we even want that
is the secondary point.
But places like Iran, for example, or others,
they're they're as much a democracy as you
would claim anybody else is. And that's the
point is I don't think any of them
are fully what we describe, But the enlightened
democracy, what does that even mean? Enlightened in
what way? That you see things the way
you want them to see them? Well, that's
what that ultimately means.
And then realize, I'm pretty sure it's not
enlightened to be committing and gaslighting for a
genocide. So let's put aside the lie that
they're these 39 countries are the one. Mostly
those 39 countries are the ones that are
blind supporting a genocide right now.
In 2021, Forbes first reported on the existence
of Paragon.
Oh, wait. Sorry. I jumped ahead.
Now it says,
even if the public were to take Paragon's
words as gospel, Derek writes, the reality is
that even so called enlightened democracies,
and this is a light way to say
this, have a tendency to target journalists and
activists to expose government corruption. You know, Assange
or the 140 that had killed in Israel
or occupied Palestine.
In 2021, writes he writes, Forbes first reported
on the existence of Paragon and noted that
many of Paragon's employees
employee LinkedIn pages
reveal their explicit connections to Israeli intelligence, sometimes
former, sometimes current. And it says par Paragon's
cofounder, director, and chief shareholder,
Ehud,
Ehud Shorenson,
was a former commander of Israel's unit 80
200 e unit. Guys, this is such an
obvious continual point. You have to realize, you're
not gonna find unit 8200 in just everything
you look at. Isn't it interesting how almost
explicitly
you find, oh, we're the leader of this
tech cohost, unit 8200.
Why? Because this is what it looks like.
This is what you're what we are discussing
is what you're seeing. That the Israeli start
up companies have infiltrated damn near everything.
And then I think, was it right here?
I'll talk I'll point this out in a
second. This is one of the shows we
did. In light of the pager attack in
Lebanon,
Israel's infiltration of US tech, considering how that
happened. And it is
everywhere.
This is just one part of this right
now. But just think about that, that the
leader of this group is unit a200, and
realize how often that ends up being the
point.
Now it says Paragon CEO, Idan Nurek, and
CTO Igor,
bag Begadlov are
also former members of Israeli intelligence.
I mean, it's really it's a finite number,
guys. And weirdly enough, it seems like they
populate all of these positions. Now it says
former Israeli prime minister, Yud Barak, is also
listed as a cofounding director and investor. Barak
is known for his connections to Israeli firms,
Toka and Carbine 911. Toka is one that,
Whitney wrote about.
I believe it's right here.
Meet Toka, the most dangerous Israeli spyware firm
you've never heard of. Pretty common.
And Carbine now Carbine, which she wrote about
in the spy,
The Prince and the Spy,
which I'll include as well since we point
to it. And this is what I've referenced
many times. It's so on the surface obvious
what this is.
That this is Israel infiltrating
the US government specifically, but the tech field
within the US, but the world.
It is transparent.
Now it says he is also infamous for
accompanying Jeffrey Epstein on his private plane many,
many times. In June 2024,
a report claimed that Paragon was in was
valued at over $1,000,000,000.
Almost immediately after Donald Trump secured his 2nd
term in the White House, ICE, this is
interesting to me, issued a call for private
companies to submit plans to improve the agency's
surveillance infrastructure, which would make sense preparing for
what Trump says he wants to do. But
realize
how clearly that is an issue. If there
was anybody else, it was not about immigration.
There's we're gonna ramp up our surveillance.
That's something we should all concern ourselves with.
That is a private that's a privacy issue.
And we're talking about biometrics where that's what
they make clear.
But maybe you're not concerned because you think
you trust Trump. And it'll only be aimed
in one direction, which I don't know why
you would think that based on history. Maybe
he just gets played, like, isn't that the
whole narrative? He got tricked? Last time I
picked the wrong people, I'll do better this
time. Well, maybe that happens again. Why would
you blind? It's obvious logic.
But it
says, the move is likely to a response
to Trump's continued calls for the largest depopulation
operation in American history.
Forbes recently reported that in the 3 months
leading
to the 2024 presidential election.
So the months before the election,
ICE had already signed $20,000,000
in contracts for spyware,
surveillance, and forensics tech that will likely be
used to track down people who Trump has
promised to deport. Now if you missed the
larger point there, I I I'd understand. Because
we're so focused on the Trump part of
this. Do you not see what just happened
right there?
Okay. You wanna explain for me why ICE,
who is currently under the Biden administration, would
be spending $20,000,000
to prepare for Trump's
deportation dynamic that they pretend they're not in
line with?
Why? Because this is always how it works.
It's simply your government, and they are playing
you like a fiddle if you fall for
the 2 party dynamic. And maybe Biden and
Trump don't even know that. I don't care.
The bottom line is if they're already preparing
and already signing $1,000,000
contracts for biometric tracking surveillance for the border,
you think they don't are that are not
in line? You think Biden's administration would just
ignore that? They can sign off or stop
these things. Now this was simply preparing for
it like we said a moment ago. That's
one thing. This is the month leading up
to the election, and they've signed $20,000,000
in contracts for spyware surveillance and forensic tech.
The very thing that Kamala and Biden, despite
also promoting the biometric wall, were at were
speaking out about.
The idea of the deportation, the I the
ice in general. Right?
Here we are. If you can't recognize what
that proves to you, that shows you that
there's only one thing happening here and it's
all about giving you the the vying narratives
to get you somewhere in the middle,
I don't know what else I can do.
Forbes reviewed numerous ICE contracts and found agreements
to purchase technologies that can surveil phone calls,
texts, and social media activity,
as well as identify individuals through facial recognition.
Alright? So for all you out there acting
like this is our next step, who don't
realize you're being played, I hope you're waking
up to this. There are partisan screamers out
there that do not care about America First,
do not care about your rights. They care
about winning. They care about benefiting from the
current structure, and many of them are also
just Zionists that want the other agenda to
happen.
The reality is you should not be asking
for facial recognition, social media surveillance. Isn't that
exactly what you're pointing out about the Democrats?
But, of course, you pretend it's only gonna
be aimed at these bad brown people, but
that's not the truth as Trump even told
you.
It says, in the last 5 months
alone,
ICE agreed to the largest federal purchase orders
to date. You know, during Biden's administration because
that perfectly makes sense. Right? In addition to
the spyware, biometric update also reported that ICE
issued a request for information,
RFI,
for biometric monitoring devices as part of its
intensive
supervision appearance
program, a program to track noncitizens
who are released from DHS custody.
Again,
doing this under Biden's administration.
There's no way around this, guys. This is
this they're doing this,
allowed to do so during the administration that
pretend they're fighting what Trump is putting forward.
ICE is seeking methods to verify biometrics
with a smartphone or tablet using facial recognition
or biometric means.
Okay? Who else in the world is scooping
up biometric data? Well, everybody it seems, but
Israel through Twitter, which we already proved for
the 45th time.
Hopefully, you're beginning to see there's a bigger
picture here. ICE is specifically looking for vendors
to provide, quote, devices that can track participant
activities and movements via geolocation.
These types of location tracking devices I like
one more point to make on that. Let's
just even say that you think and let's
just say they do have the best of
intentions. And they only wanna do this to
keep you safe, which in some people's minds,
I'm sure that's what they think is happening.
Even if it is the case, you realize
that through using Paragon, Israel has access to
all of this.
That they they log and access this when
this is the reality of where this goes.
So even if this is a good intention
thing, Israel will still manipulate that like they
have in every other situation we pointed to.
These types of location tracking devices are useful
not only to ICE, as Derek writes,
but to private prison companies
who stand to benefit from an increase in
holding facilities for illegal immigrants.
The CEO of GEO Group, one of the
biggest private prison contractors,
recently estimated
that the company could make as much as
$400,000,000
a year under Trump's
presidency by filling beds with individuals accused
of illegal immigration.
Pam Bondi, of course,
while, you know, Zionist we've gone over all
of them. Trump's pick for attorney general
is a former lobbyist for the GEO Group.
What do you know?
Paragon is not the only company getting in
on the lucrative contracts, by the way. Here's
a few of the examples Derek plucks out.
There's a lot more. Boldend,
their only customer is the US government, which
usually stands out to me as be a
cutout of something else. That same report notes
that a presentation from defense contractor Raytheon included
a slide which claimed that Boldend was backed
by none other than Peter Thiel
Via his fund founders fund, Thiel is a
Bilderberg steering committee member who cofounded private surveillance
via firm Palantir,
who is basically string puller of Trump's administration,
it seems, funding through Vance and the rest
of it, but really just a concerning figure
that seems to be a very influential part
of Trump's administration
that, guys, I mean, just might as well
represent technocracy. And he's actively pull seems to
be of his his fingers seem to be
involved in damn near all of these overlapping
parts.
You keep seeing this pop up.
Now you can see that these different groups
that are that they're driving forward for the
under guise of an immigration problem, for Israel's
benefit, just so happened to be funded by
Peter Thiel.
Now it says, 2 sources familiar with the
company confirmed to Forbes that Bolden was funded
by Thiel's company. Now there's Sellbrite. Sellbrite is
another Israeli firm, of course, which signed a
contract with ICE worth $9,600,000.
So there's more than one that they've signed
contracts with.
Clearview AI, we've talked about. Also backed by
Peter Thiel's founder fund founders fund. In September,
Clearview AI partnered with ICE for its largest
federal contract at $1,100,000.
For that's for Clearview AI.
The January 2020 in January 2021,
Derek reported for t Lab that Clearview AI's
technology was being used to identify and locate
individuals who participated in the January 6th riots,
which obviously, that's the the way they're framing
it. The point is clearly, we know the
history of this and the reality of the
lies around what January 6th was. The point
is that this is a group that teal
funded that explicitly went after January 6th members
for being present.
And he seems to be a chief member
of the direction. I mean, does that concern
you? Anyone out there running a red hat
or believing in nag or a thing? It's
incredible
how we can't see the red flags here.
And I mean, I keep saying that for
I'm pointing at the partisan level. I as
you guys know, I'm of the mind that
most of you actually see this. It's about
it's about trying to take action.
You know, even if you don't know what
the right step is, the right step, first
of all, is to stop going through the
same motions.
But it says it is extremely likely that
this technology will be used to pursue illegal
immigrants.
So that should bother you if it was
used to go after you.
Magnet Forensics is another one. They they mentions.
Penlink is another example. There's a lot of
these. These are different companies that are building
out this whole surveillance apparatus which seems to
be largely funded through Israel. And that's the
point he makes here. The type of software
sold by Paragons
or by Paragon is known as spyware
because it is explicitly aimed at helping the
user gain unauthorized
remote access to an Internet enabled device for
surveillance and data extraction. Remote
being important.
So right now, through these apps you're using
that we've been all sold as completely secure,
that art, Telegram,
signal. Now it says according to to September
2024 report from the Atlantic Council, the vast
majority of spyware vendors
and associated entities are in 3 places, Israel,
India, and Italy.
But important to know that 43.9%
of the entire market
is concentrated in Israel. Guys, see, this is
the kind of point that is important to
walk away with.
Whatever else you think about that, this is
a fact that can't be denied.
So they they control almost 50% of the
market
in regard to the surveillance and biometric tracking.
That's terrifying with what we know and what
they're currently doing. And the fact that your
government seems to be just meshing itself together
with this. In fact, I think it's far
more I think that happened a long time
ago.
Now it says the main targets of spyware
deployed by governments, and this is historically accurate.
Journalists,
activists, politicians.
And this is what we continue to see,
and yet we continue to pretend like this
won't be a problem.
One prime example of commercial spyware being used
to target individuals is what we've talked about
in the past, Pegasus spyware sold, surprise surprise,
by Israeli firm, as an NSO Group. In
2020, more than 50,000 phone numbers belonging to
individuals identified as, quote, people of interest
by nations using Pegasus was leaked to Amnesty
International and Forbidden Stories. Their reporting revealed that
NSO Group developed and supplied
their Pegasus spyware to international governments, which in
turn use them
to target government officials. Journalists,
activists,
academics,
embassy workers.
Well, isn't that exactly what Israel's on live
TV doing right now? So it shouldn't be
that shocking.
The point is your government's okay with this,
and they pretend not to be. The reporting
from the Washington Post showed that Pegasus was
used to target the wife of journalist, Jamal
Khashoggi,
months before he was murdered by Israel
or rather by Saudi Arabia, which I argue
is the same extension of the same conversation.
But it says, Pegasus leadership was has denied
their spyware was used in the murder.
In February, Poland's prime minister announced that the
previous government had deployed NSO Group's Pegasus to
hack opposition politicians. You realize Israel is aware
of all this because they have access back
to their access to all of this stuff.
In 2022, it was reported that the FBI
had purchased a license to use Pegasus.
FBI director Wray claimed it was to research
for development purposes.
They really think we're this stupid. Now guess
what? Internal FBI documents and court records obtained
by the New York Times show that the
FBI officials attempted to use Pegasus. Oh my
god. We're so shocked. In 202021.
In their own criminal investigations,
after the Times reported on this secret purchase
and attempted use of Pegasus, the FBI conducted
its internal investigation to uncover who used the
tools
only to find out that the FBI itself
contracted with vendor, River Networks.
In fact, it says FBI contracted River Networks
to track drug smugglers in Mexico using Landmark,
another NSO group technology known for tracking cell
phones.
You think this is by accident? You think
your government would continually stumble this stupidly into
the same problem? Certainly possible. In fact, I
could point out other examples. But I argue
that there's so much awareness of this.
I think what we're
seeing is the manufacturing of consent for where
the new world is going. The new world
order that Elon and the rest are telling
you is gonna go in a good direction.
I certainly hope you're right. But everything on
the table shows you that they're piedpipering you
right into your own your own demise.
Now, I'll include the articles that he links
in there. 1, just one of the many.
I signed $2,000,000
contract with spyware maker Paragon Solutions, and really
ask yourself whether that may have an influence
on the way that we're being told the
story is going from the border.
Ask yourself what that that might make a
difference.
And the article he points out from 2021
that he wrote for TLAB, in the aftermath
of capital raid,
the facial recognition threats persist.
As well as the Center For Democracy and
Technology, DHS must come clean on contracts with
spyware purveyor. That's from November 4th this year.
And the actual contract from the US government.
Paragon Solutions.
Of course, there's not a single mention of
Israel in there. Surprise. Surprise. Funny how everywhere
else, it's all about promoting and, you know,
it's just funny how I think that shows
you something. Now I'll I'll include these articles
as well. The weaponized migration experimentation, tools for
subversion division and manufacturing consent.
That's exactly what I think we're dealing with.
Or the save act dynamic, which we're already
telling you, this is a Trojan horse dynamic.
They're using the border conversation to drive you
into ex to not just accepting, but calling
for your own subjugation.
Demanding your own digital ID in a different
name.
That's what's happening.
As well as the article he recently put
out from 18th, Trump confirms plan to declare
national emergency for mass deportations using military assets.
How that goes forward? We get to see.
But a national emergency coming off the COVID
discussion, I can't believe anybody on the Republican
side would even
accept that for a second.
On top of that, mass deportations.
I mean, all of this stuff seems so
outside, like, what we would ever accept as
normal.
Or military assets internally. When he even referenced
a point from bringing them in overseas. I
mean, we're talking about posse comatatus. Now I
go over all of this in the show.
All of this, as Derek points out, will
lead to more surveillance,
more restriction of rights.
Now, to finish the segment,
we saw this come around. And this this
is the point I was making in the
beginning.
What do we keep talking about?
This problem has been hyped and discussed and
batted back and forth for a long time.
One of these classic wedge issues that always
seem to be used to manipulate and hide
the larger stories, even though they're important in
their own right.
Now, suddenly, they're going, oh, okay. Guess what?
UK comes out and says they were always
doing this, and they were experimenting on you.
Yes. It was open border policy,
which I don't know if that's exactly accurate.
But I think the reality is we all
see that they were messing with the right?
I mean, even the it's a 2 party
game. The point we saw with Texas recently
where they the republican went 30 feet down
the road and was like, guys, there's there's
gates swinging open right here. Why are we
all circled around this one gate acting like
we're demanding that when these gates are all
open?
If you don't see how crazy that is,
it shows you that that they could be
going through any of these gates.
We were being played, and a lot of
Republicans called that out.
Not to say that there's not an issue
with the border. My point is that both
sides are you that was a Republican governor,
are using this.
And in this case, as,
this has been going around, Starmer says, this
happened by design, not accident. There it's a
rule running an open border experiment, he says.
They pretend that it wasn't happening.
Well, that's interesting because see that seems to
lean in explicitly with a narrative being put
forward, which there's some truth to from the
republican side, which then drives you into going,
we knew it. They're doing this. The Democrats
are doing this. We need to stop it.
And can you guess what the solution will
be?
Can you guess?
It's exactly what we just went over. It's
already happening. Look in the comments. Look in
the conversation.
The same act and the digital not digital
IDs, but they what they need to have.
Right? We need this to make sure they
have this so they have the identification or
in this case, that we have biometric scans,
that we have the biometric wall, that we
have everything we're talking about, which of course
is completely packed to the t with Israeli
spyware.
Elon says, let's see if they do anything
about it.
Just it's just so funny how clearly I
I almost think half the time he thinks
like he's being so sneaky and snide. He
is
playing you.
Let's see anything about it. Like, so he's
he want you to go, oh my god.
Let's get this moving. We need to jump
in and say the it's just you guys
are being led by the nose.
Into thin air points to the same video
and says, we were right the entire time.
See what I'm see what I'm talking about?
Open border was a deliberate experiment. Why? Because
a government person said? Wait a minute. So
now to be clear, that's clearly what they've
been saying and thinking, but it's their opinion
based on what they see or arguably they
think that's the provable fact and maybe it
is.
But
now it's being you're saying we're right because
a foreign leader of a government said so?
Don't governments lie to us? Couldn't they be
couldn't he be lying for his interest? My
point is it's just because it's what they
want to hear. So that proves it because
it goes along with what we think. Typical
partisan stuff. The overall point to me is
what David Icke said.
Look at the theme across the board. What
has been happening is revealed by those who
want it to happen,
while they pose as people opposing what is
happening and those who will fix it. See
how easy that is? Whether it's Elon or
Trump or Star I mean, this dude's so
easy.
They point to the thing they've been building
up and go, dwee, you need to do
it. We're not gonna use the 2 party
paradigm. Right? It's the other side that have
allowed it so you could all ramped up
and call for your own subjugation.
Meanwhile, they pursue the same agenda by other
means and manipulation.
Now, of course, he could be wrong. But
it just seems like people are so unwilling
to consider this when their chosen ideologue is
somehow the culprit. And this is how partisan
politics works.
So bringing us in to the last conversation
we had about the ethics pledge and everything
else. We recently talked about this in on
25th.
Trump team barred from agencies with the point.
And that that was about the discussion how
the article was framed, saying at the moment,
at the very least, they were not able
to access the information. The agencies weren't letting
them because they weren't signing these pledges.
Now we just I briefly talked about at
the beginning. The obvious point here
is that this
is legally required,
not least of which because Donald Trump signed
this in 2020 rather than 2019 and brought
it to 2020.
So you can't pretend like it's something he's
not aware of. He signed this into law.
And in general, for me, as I said
before, it's not really about whether they sign
these in the context that I think that
matters in regard to transparency and ethics. I
don't think any of these people are honest.
What? They're not transparent. They're not ethical. I
think that's ridiculous.
Like, do we do we do are we
gonna pretend that, you know, Biden and Kamala
signed them and it stopped them from being
unethical? Come on, guys. They all lie to
you. My point is about the legal restriction
and allowances that open or close because
these are signed or not.
And it's really important. And it goes to
the larger picture.
Not allowing us to see who's don't who's
donating. Not putting caps on the donations in
general. Not not divulging
explicit lobbying conflicts of interest. Now these things
may still come to pass, and I argue
that's kind of an expected point.
I I I felt it really hard to
believe that it wouldn't happen.
But I'm worried about that, essentially, because if
it doesn't happen at all, it shows you
a lot things, and I'll address that when
it gets there. My point is that right
this moment,
there seems to be already an opening of
like, with this exact point, with Trump signing
of the White House transition agreement. That's one
of the 3,
but not the other 2.
So you already have this beginning overlap where
they're getting access to some things. When in
reality, as they pointed out, we still don't
know. They they could be right now getting
all and oh, the bigger point as well.
It it when they sign the ethics and
so on, they get unlocked federal funding.
But they're claiming they never want that at
all. They're saying we're gonna use our own
private money.
We're gonna have our our own or we're
gonna operate as our own independent group.
Really?
Like, how can we not at least ask
whether that independent group could be a foreign
country?
What what let's just say China, for example.
Doesn't that concern you? They could have influenced
this. Well, we know that would never happen
because Trump. Well, there's your partisan blindness. Of
course, I would agree that doesn't seem to
make sense, but it certainly could be. Right?
So the re the unnerving reality that we're
in a situation where we don't get to
see the transparency of the finances, but on
top of that, that they're telling you that
they're gonna go forward like that in general.
Now they're using the argument they're gonna save
the taxpayers money. We'll get into that in
a second. I honestly think that's a complete
manipulation. But even if it was gonna save
money, well, there's the point of the show
today.
Using something we want to hide a bigger
lie. So let's read through this. This is
from
the 26th.
After delay,
Trump signs agreement with Biden, White House to
begin formal transition hand off.
Hold on. Did I just close something I
shouldn't have? Oh, no. It's right here.
Oh, hold on. Did I mix these up?
Oh, I see what I did.
Hold on. Did I double up on this?
Give me 10 seconds to make sure I
didn't,
29th.
Okay. So that's what this was. It's the
same one. Oh, I see. Okay. I'm just
confusing myself. It's all lined up right. I
see, I I I laugh myself all the
time when I do this. I add things
kind of like last minute essentially, or I
just get confused on where I was, and
I'm already ahead of myself. So again, after
delays, that was why I showed you the
first show for. That was what we've talked
about before. That they were kinda delaying on
all of it. Right? Barred from all of
this. Now, after delay, he signs one of
them with Biden.
Now it says president-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday
reached a required agreement,
legally
required, with president Biden and the White House
to allow his transition staff to coordinate with
the existing federal workforce before taking office in
January 20th.
The congressionally
mandated agreement
that Trump signed in to law allows transition
aids to work with federal agencies
and access non public information and gives a
green light to government workers to talk to
the transition team. Now that's kind of mixing
the 3 of them.
That non public information comes after signing transparency
and ethics pledges. But it says, but Trump
has declined
to sign separate agreements with the General Services
Administration, the GSA,
that would have given his team access to
secure government offices,
email
accounts, in part because it would require that
the president-elect limit contributions to $5,000
and reveal who's donating to his team.
Now why would that not want to be
the case? Under the guise of going, we
don't wanna spend your money. But you could
do that. You could use your own money,
but then also be transparent about it, couldn't
you?
But see, of course, the people that wanna
blind support him will find a way to
make it make sense. Obviously, the answer is
yes. Obviously, you could demonstrate this and still
take. You know, of course, the point could
be that you're make you're getting 1,000,000 from
1 group. And you that that that challenges
the $5,000
thing. Right? So and that should matter to
you though, who it is and where it
comes from. Now, of course, it'll come they'll
point out in a second. They claim they're
gonna show you later.
That's pretty up in the air. And in
in historically, you rarely is the case.
But my one my point, first of all,
is that the secure office has an email
account, let's say.
So the point is that they're given access
to these things. Now what happens if they
eventually get that access whether or not they
sign these? Or what if they already have
in some ways? And what if there's something
behind this that is having now access to
internal government information? Maybe that's already happening long
before this. But I just think these are
questions that are very relevant that very few
people seem to be asking.
The White House agreement was supposed to have
been signed on October 1st according to the
presidential transition act. The Biden White House had
issued both public and private appeals for Trump
to sign them.
As part of the agreement with the White
House, Trump's team now really quickly, by the
way, I've this has been stated, but let's
be clear. There is very little you if
this was as big a deal I mean,
it is a big deal in my opinion.
And if it if let's just say if
the Biden minister the democrats were as adversarial
with Trump and it wasn't really just your
government that that's a lie,
wouldn't you think this would be blaring on
every channel? Why Elon speaking to foreign entities?
Why Trump's pro proposing ceasefires when he's not
even in power yet? These are actually illegal.
Why don't they make a big deal about
it? Because I think you already know the
answer. Because that's the overall agenda, and they're
not really at odds when it comes to
the main agenda.
But it says, as part of the agreement
with the White House, Trump's team will have
to publicly disclose its ethics plan for the
transition operation and make a commitment to uphold
it. Now, I really don't care about that.
They they make plans and and promise x,
y, and z and never deliver. They're not
ethical or not transparent. But
first part of it is they do have
a plan they lay out to show what
they believe is their ethical path and then
everyone has to agree that's what path they're
gonna buy abide by. It's it's relevant, I
guess, in that general sense that you at
least argue they have some kind of metric
to a shit, hold to them hold them
to.
But it's about the what's unlocked within that.
But it says transition aids must sign statements
that they have no financial positions
that could pose a conflict of interest before
they receive access to non public federal information.
You know, sort of like having a conflict
of interest with being a part of the
Israeli government or being funded by Israel or
funded by China or being a asset of
Iran. Like, these things should matter, shouldn't they?
Biden himself raised the agreement with Trump when
they met in the Oval Office on November
13th, according to the White House. And Trump
indicated that his team was working on it.
That's an interesting response. It was something that
he wanted to say that I'm not gonna
do. You think that, you know, the bombastic
Trump would make that clear. To me, that
shows you something. He says that we're working
on it. So I think the plan is
either to extend push this out,
which opens this gap right now where there's
kind of limbo is going on. And I
think that's part of the I think that's
the most alarming.
But if it ultimately doesn't get signed and
somehow that doesn't get pointed out or they
kinda just let it pass, That also shows
shows you something much more alarming and also
shows you that they're on the same side.
Without the signed agreement, Biden administration officials were
restricted
in what they could share with the incoming
team. Another point to make, because I made
in the last show, how much you wanna
bet, this plays a factor in the senate
confirmation.
Like, whatever happens between then and now, whatever
happened in the 1st few months of Trump's
administration, this will be pointed to. It's their
fault we weren't prepared because they didn't give
us what we needed to know. Well, they're
gonna say because you didn't sign the documents,
which you didn't. But isn't that always how
it goes? They both point at each other,
both side takes their narrative and acts like
the other one doesn't make sense? Partisan nonsense.
Constant.
But my point is, as we see this
come closer to the the senate confirmation dynamic,
we're gonna I bet you this will play
a factor. The Trump transition team says it
would disclose its donors to the public and
would not take foreign donations.
You realize how ridiculous this is?
You not least of which is because they
literally already are taking foreign donations.
Right? Here is one of the many articles,
but this is before it even was, like
this is back from, June.
Trump is desperate
for Miriam at Miriam Adelson's cash. So that's
that's the wife of the deceased Adelson.
Her condition?
Illegal West Bank annexation.
Realize this has already happened. It's very public.
She gave him about a $100,000,000.
Not the first time, by the way.
And
Mary Madelsohn was born in Tel Aviv, which
by the way was mandatory Palestine in 1945.
You know, that that place had never existed.
So what's funny to me
is that she's literally a whether she's also
got American citizenship, she is a 4 she
was born in Tel Aviv. She is an
Israeli oligarch. That's what she is. And she
is openly funding Trump's administration.
So what do you mean you're gonna not
take foreign donations? Now, of course, you could
argue I just meant now. Then what's the
difference? If you already did, why now is
it different? Game is to make you think
they're not, but also that you're just saying
that.
I don't believe that for a second. And
what do you consider foreign? How much you
wanna bet they don't look at Israel as
being a foreign entity? There's all these weird
caveats. Bottom line, is the reason we don't
know for sure that I argue I can
almost prove these lines because,
first, I showed you that, but because they're
in this limbo where they're not tell letting
you see it. They're refusing to dragging their
feet on something that Trump wrote in the
law that he already did last year last
administration
and now is saying he's working on it.
What's the holdup?
It's a signed document. It's not that difficult.
And it's something they've already worked on. I
can guarantee it. There's a reason this is
being stretched out.
Probably to hide the fact that they are
taking donations from foreign entities.
A separate agreement with the Department of Justice
to coordinate background checks for vetting and security
clearances
is being actively worked on and could be
signed quickly now that the White House agreement
is signed. That's at least what they're saying.
That's the same point. They're saying we're we're
we're putting this together. I don't see why
the signing of the White House part of
it makes that any more rapidly completed.
I don't know. The agency
has teams of investigators standing by to process
clearances for Trump aids and advisers
once that document is signed.
So the longer this stretches out, how many
people are sort of going, well, you're already
gonna be president here. I have access to
this. Or we already see this happening in
some ways.
Is that part of it? Are they gaining
access to things they didn't have before? Are
there more people finding more access? I mean,
we can't hide the reality of Israel's on
the surface influence and infiltration of the US
government. But, again, the point should be doesn't
matter what the foreign entity is in the
context of the point.
You should care that this might be happening,
that the evidence seems to back it up.
It says that would
clear the way for transition aids, signing of
that document, and future administration appointees and nominees
to begin accessing
classified information before Trump takes office.
Now look. Even if they sign this document,
let's realize the alarming reality of the Zionist
administration he has, And they will have access
to government documentation. Huckabee, who's literally telling you
Israel's gonna bring on the end times, in
real time, telling you that he believes the
prophetic discussion of what Israel and and you're
gonna think he wouldn't if god said that's
what's supposed to happen, that he wouldn't give
them information about the US government?
Guys, it's already happening.
It says some of the Trump aids may
hold active clearances from his first term in
office or other government rules, but others will
need new clearances to access classified data. There
you go. Point is they all will, and
that's gonna be concerning seeing as how they're
all Zionist manipulators.
Trump's team on Friday formally told the GSA
that they would not utilize the government office,
the space they're providing,
from the White House reserved for their use
or government email accounts,
phones, or computers during the transition. So look,
on the surface to the average person
looking at what's been going on,
it's very easy to couch this in. Well,
they are concerned about because, you know, they're
the good guy. Right? They're the outsider despite
being packed with literal insiders, technocrats, billionaires, oligarchs,
like the literal deep state dynamic. But, you
know, they're the outsiders because we say that.
So the point is that because of the
outsiders, we don't want to use your offices
or government because you're gonna spy on us.
Yeah. Maybe.
But how about it's building to the obvious
point? All the other evidence points to something
else, which is that something else is going
on here. Not divulging where the money's coming
from, not not giving you any Conflict of
Interest documents, dragging your feet on all of
this stuff, while
saying we're never gonna use your office space.
We're never gonna use your computer's email accounts.
So isn't it concerning that if, let's just
say, everything else is off the table, that
you now have an incoming administration that's telling
you we're gonna operate like an independent agency?
That we're not gonna access the location, the
computers, the phones, and anything else like we
normally you use in the government.
Now if everything you hear about Trump would
be true, which it's not,
you could argue that this is them trying
to, you know, they recognize the deep state's
in control and they wanna fight. I I
see why that may make sense that might
make sense.
I hope you're right.
But with everything else going on and literally
swamp creature deep state administration in front of
you, we should maybe ask whether this is
about something else.
That we're watching a coup take place in
front of us. But, of course, the people
that would be most am most likely to
call out something like that are pacified because
Trump's in position. Weirdly, just like with COVID
19.
The White House said it does not agree
with Trump's decision to forego support from the
GSA.
But it is working on alternative ways to
get Trump appointees the information they need without
jeopardizing national security.
So they're gonna work around it. Kinda sounds
like a government plan.
For instance, agencies may require in person meetings
and documents reviews since the Trump team has
declined to shift to using secure phones and
computers.
Okay. What let's just say the argument will
be that we'll use our own. Right? Well,
how do we not know that those are
compromised by Israel? How do we not know
that those are not technically secure because they
made a mistake and that becomes a problem?
Now you we can already see how this
cascades into so many obvious problems.
Now, I don't know whether it's his prerogative.
I think there is some level of legality
around what they're allowed, like, from national security
perspective. I'm not even saying I necessarily truly
care about that from the context of, like,
the government control over the action. But
with the opening, we can see from foreign
entities,
with the intro the the a very alarming
influence. I think we should ask whether there
might be something more happening here.
Now this is a a follow-up from Cobb
Korea.
Or rather again, sorry. It's basically the same
report from another local paper. I just wanna
show you some of the things they added.
Some of the redundant parts, but I think
it's important to see. It says the items
are required, the same signed documents,
from the presidential transition act of 63
and its later amendments as from 2019 during
Trump's administration, which he signed in 2020.
A condition of the agreements
and the funding they release
is that nominees must disclose all transition fundraising
dollars, which are kept separate from campaign funds.
The cap the law caps individual contributions
to transition to $5,000.
Now the question becomes, is there some kind
of a cutoff? Like, so let's just say
they sign these today. Are they then required
to divulge everything from before that? Or is
it only from when they sign it going
forward? And in in any case, I argue
that I don't think there will really be
an accountability here because I think it's a
plan. My point though is to create this
kind of muddy area where we don't really
see how these things connect. That's where these
problems begin.
I think it's about something much larger than
we've seen.
It says to save taxpayers hard earned money,
they write.
Which, again, I'll I'll read something somebody else
wrote, but the point is I don't think
that's even how that I mean, realize, your
taxes are being taken. K? They don't take
more tax that year because they do spend
more money. The point is, they tax you
like they tax you. They then use this
money as they see fit to pretend like
him not doing this somehow reduces what you're
they still took your tax dollars.
They're always playing on the ignorance of the
imagine the average American.
Trump's team also announced it will not use
government buildings or technology available for transition operations
and instead,
quote,
will be a self sufficient organization.
Now, yeah, that may sound like a positive
change.
But realize with all of the influence from
out from
the Zionism from Israel alone, but plenty of
other dynamics that we should I mean, like,
again, the technocratic side of this, with the
the which we'll get into later in the
show, the idea of the Prospera,
tech the the rise of technocracy governance we're
seeing around the world. Maybe that's what you're
looking at. Maybe we're talking about Peter Thiel
and his technocrat buddies literally taking over the
government right now. I mean, these are not
Farfetch ideas. I think that's a bigger thing
happening in the world in general right now.
So that's why I framed it today as
the 2 We're a technocrat Zionist coup in
this country. I think this is what we're
looking at right now, whether it's a soft
idea or some I think it's already partially
there. From what we can see from everybody
in this government being paid off by APAC
and lying about what's going on, but something
deeper than that right now that goes into
a much larger I mean, the COVID 19
on the tail of this.
The president-elect
and his personnel have been conducting meetings and
announcing cabinet positions from his Mar a Lago
estate in Florida.
So you've got a Mar a Lago personal
residence. You've got their own personal devices. You've
got no sign doc I mean, this seems
like a rogue entity right now.
That's not mean you can make that about
Trump or not. Frankly, it's about the data
around it no matter who's there. If Kamala
was doing this, I'd be making the same
argument. By law, the ethics plan must be
publicly available and must disclose whether lobbyists or
foreign agents
are part of the transition team. We'll look
at that. Doesn't that matter?
It should. Now, e listen again. The point
is right now, there's an opening.
So what if right now, there are parts
of this transition team that are being given
access to things because they're included in the
group
that 3 days from now when they sign
the document, they're no longer part of it.
See what I'm talking about? There is a
gap right now that is being exploited.
What is being done is what I'm trying
to find out.
That says and whether they are part of
the team. And identify any other conflicts of
interest by those involved. Like, if if there
are conflicts of interest, then we shouldn't even
be giving any transition of information.
As well as the commitments to keep non
public government information confidential
and not to use insider knowledge learned during
the transition for personal gain.
The transition team did not respond to request
for a timeline of when they will make
these things public.
Surprise, surprise.
Now this goes into yesterday.
Trump signed into law or signed the law
to require presidential ethics pledges in 2020.
Now he now I don't like the way
they frame this. Of course, I lost my
highlighting, but I've got it right here.
It's it says, now he is exempting himself
from it. That's a bit of a stretch,
seeing as how we haven't gotten past this
point yet. He could've just be dragging his
feet. Right? To be objective about it. Be
honest.
But, again, part of me tell thinks that
that's why they're framing it like this. So
you get the immediate pushback from people that
that's not the truth. That's not even accurate.
Who wanna believe Trump. And you give them
the smallest gap, they'll take advantage of it.
That's what partisan mindset will do.
But reading into this, the point is that
there right now, there is this gap. That's
what I'm highlighting. So let's read what independent
was writing.
It says that a bipartisan bill to boost
transparency and make sure incoming presidents stick to
an ethics plan was so uncontroversial
that it passed the senate by a voice
vote in 2020.
Donald Trump then signed it into law, which
is interesting, I think.
Trump appeared to have excluded himself from those
same ethical guidelines I'm talking about right now
after the speak with, you know, speaking with
Joe Biden.
Trump missed 2 months of deadlines before finally
signing off on an agreement with Joe Biden
and beginning
the transition process.
See? Right there. What exact process are we
talking about? There's gonna be some level of
access to things that weren't accessible to the
normal person,
that now suddenly
people that we don't know are having access
to this. Foreign entities could be having access
to this. People could be funding them. And
the you see my point?
That says, but the agreement does not appear
to include the president elect's pledge to avoid
conflicts of interest
while in office despite requirements under a renewed
presidential transition act he signed into law.
Trump's team is turning down federal funding and
office space for his transition team as well
as an official government checks and security checks
for his staff.
All these things seem to be very important
to national security. Why wouldn't people be pulling
their hair out right now? The the president-elect
has rebuffed agreements with the Department of Justice
to process security clearances to access classified information
during the transition.
Says, quote, the reliance on private donors to
fund the transition, which is what's happening, is
nothing more than a ploy for well connected
Trump insiders to line their pockets while pretending
to save taxpayer money. It's not too far
off, in my opinion. Now whatever the reason
is, I don't believe for a second this
is saving you any money. Your money's already
being taken. It's about whether they use it
now or give it to Israel or spend
1 war or whatever else we're talking about.
You build the biometric wall.
Overall, though, private funding to conduct a transition
for a new power, doesn't that seem uncomfortable?
Can you imagine if this was Hillary Clinton
doing the same thing? Or Kamala Harris or
Joe Biden or anybody with a d by
their name literally going into transition without ever
divulging who was funding them.
I don't even need to make another point.
You guys already know. Most of you are
already probably connected the dots. That doesn't make
sense. It should bother you.
The team said it is turning down federal
support, quote, consistent with president Trump's commitment to
save taxpayer money. Easy as that.
But accepting the money,
of course, would have put a $5,000 cap
on don't individual donations to the team and
require public disclosure of those donors. That seems
to be the obvious point here. Trump's team
merely said it would not allow foreign contributions
and would be disclosing as donors, but did
not reveal any guidelines for those pledges.
Okay. So what
as I said before, obvious being
already getting formulations. That's already proven.
That they'll eventually disclose them.
What happens if they get elected
or already there and get in end up
in power?
And then all this roll like, point we
roll out about where this is going happens.
And the point is once you know it's
too late.
Especially, if we're worried about this being some
sort of endgame in all of this. But
it says, by turning down 7,000,000 in funding
from the federal government for the transition process,
Trump will be able to raise unlimited private
donations for the transition.
This is the independent. This is exactly what
I'm talking about.
Now how about okay. How about if this
is taxpayer money? Take the $7,000,000 and give
it to us. Give it to the give
give it to American people. Of course, that's
not what will happen.
But he goes on to say, the team
will operate
as a self sufficient organization.
And it's, quote, organizational organizational
autonomy
means a streamlined
process, Trump's campaign said. So this is gonna
overlap with a very concerning conversation.
Specifically,
about these,
you know, freedom cities and this this direction
that it's going that I think is very
concerning. And also with the general point of
Prospera
and what this is showing you. This technocratic
rise in governance that is circumventing government. Which,
by the way, I'm the 1st person to
say we don't want government, but I don't
want some new technocratic version of government taking
its place. Right? See how that's the whole
point of today.
Using something we don't want to drive you
into accepting something worse, but while believing is
the solution to the problem you're fighting.
Goes on to say the presidential transition enhancements
enhancement act was Trump signed, requires presidential candidates
to, quote, create and release an ethics plan.
We already said talked about this. Some redundancy.
The plan requires teams to avoid both actual
and apparent conflicts of interest and to safeguard
classified information
and non public information and other information that
is not readily available to the public. So
right there. Classified is the line for you
have to sign these pledges. But they're already
getting access to non public information
right now.
It also blocks team members from lobbying activities
and prohibits them from serving as registered foreign
agents.
So in other words, right now,
they can.
Shouldn't that bother you? Doesn't have to mean
that it is by by by deaf,
for sure.
But if we don't know, it could be.
So when they sign these, they won't be
able to obviously register act as a registered
foreign agent. But people right now could be
in this administration who are
registered foreign agents, and we wouldn't know because
they haven't signed these documents.
Without through thorough reviews
of the incoming administration's
financial withholdings and interest by the office of
government ethics,
those nominees could be in a position to
benefit from their proximity to power, which by
the way is what every government in every
situation and every side has done as far
back as you can look.
Without the crucial review, which is mandated by
law, nominees may enter office with conflicts of
interest, obvious or hidden, that they are not
ordered to remedy.
Those power holders could manipulate the government for
their own personal benefit while facing little to
no consequence.
Make sure I didn't miss something at the
bottom here.
Yeah, it's right there. Same point. So I
I'm guys, I'm genuinely concerned about this. Where
this is going. So let's play a clip
before we get into the problem that I
wanna address here. Around,
oh, really? So I guess I did put
this to the end. So I quickly point
to this before. So I wanna go so
I guess the the Bitcoin AI part adds
to the later part. But realize that we're
talking about down here,
Mark Anderson,
who who is in all these clips with
Joe Rogan pointing at the problem.
Right? And using that problem to rationalize and
justify the next step, which is how this
is working, is literally involved with the idea
of freedom cities.
He's getting involved with those apparently, and all
these overlapping interests, and this is what I'm
concerned about. That freedom cities itself is referencing
things like Prospera. Guys, these are technocratic nightmares.
They're not libertarian. They're using what you want
to manipulate you. And my problem is that
I can see, and I'll go over this
thread. So what oops.
It's a great thread, and I'll play this
clip for you as it looks like Jenny
Cohen goes over the information around what these
things are, and he's referencing what they call,
where was it in here? Par oh, that
what I think is interesting on this is
it's, it's hold on. Let me find the
words.
A network state
as some kind of new governance structure, guys.
That's what they're literally pointing to. That's what
Trump is highlighting with Freedom Cities. This is
not about an ad and a part of
the government or some new venture for the
US American people. This is about a separation.
And so, from my perspective, in many ways,
I'm going, that's what I would want, but
not like this. Not with what this is
a ploy using a technocratic control structure to
get you to think you're stepping into some
new phase of government. It's a, guys, it's
a pull. We are being guided into the
new step, in my opinion. And I think
that's what all of this comes back to.
And what I was gonna say a second
ago
is they highlight this idea of parallel establishments
or exit and build. I'm literally, I've said
this to Derek. I say it literally, they
are co opting everything, including exit and build.
Now we're gonna exit and build and drive
you into our new AI controlled, powered, technocratic.
That's the exit and build society, parallel economy?
No.
It's the ploy. It's like pretending bitcoin is
now a strategic reserve as opposed to being
something that challenges the
dollar. We're being led into this structure. Now
I wanna play a clip from Loki,
some of it anyway, it's it's a longer
one, that goes over the reality of his
own investigation, most of which you've already seen,
of the influence of Israeli
government entities, Israeli Zionist entities in Trump's cabinet.
And this should matter more than anything with
what we just discussed.
Trump has assembled
the most pro Israel cabinet in the history
of the United States. I've investigated his funders.
It's not looking good. Donald Trump will repeat
the mantra. America first. America first.
America
first. But when you look down his list
of funders,
it seems like it might just be Israel
first. Donald Trump selected Pete Hegseth
as his secretary of defense. Pete Hegseth called
for Trump to bomb Iranian energy
and nuclear facilities. What better time than now
to say, we're starting the clock. You've got
a week. You've got x amount of time
before we start taking out your energy production
facilities. We take out key infrastructure. We take
out your missile sites. We take out nuclear
development. We take out a popular idea.
And here Hegseth is advocating
for Israel replacing
Al Aqsa with what he calls the third
temple.
1948
was a miracle.
1967 was a miracle.
2017,
the declaration of Jerusalem as the capital was
a miracle,
and there's no reason why the miracle
of the reestablishment
of the temple on the temple mount is
not possible. And what about Trump's ambassador to
Israel, Mike Huckabee? He has publicly claimed there
is no occupation of the West Bank and
he refuses
to refer to the West Bank as anything
but Judea and Samaria.
There is no such thing as a West
Bank. It's Judea and Samaria. Mhmm. There's no
such thing as a settlement. Their communities, their
neighborhoods, their cities,
there's no such thing as an occupation. Trump
has also selected
Elise Stefanik
as his US ambassador
to the United Nations. She's someone who has
gone on record as saying that nothing Israel
ever does could cause the United States to
remove funding from it. There is no excuse
for an American president to block aid to
Israel. No excuse.
Full stop.
That's why I'm proud to have sponsored or
backed every measure to aid Israel that has
come before the United States Congress.
Every single one. They say follow the money,
so I did. To start with, Sheldon Adelson
bankrolled Donald Trump's first election as president of
the United States. Sheldon Adelson very publicly
supported the use of nuclear weapons against Iran.
You pick up your cell phone and you
call somewhere in Nebraska and you say, okay.
Let it go.
So there's an atomic weapon goes over ballistic
missiles in middle of the middle of the
desert that doesn't hurt a soul.
Maybe a couple of rattlesnakes
and scorpions or whatever.
And then you and then you say, see,
the next one is in the middle of
the terror. His
request
from Trump
prior to the election was that if Trump
arrived in the White House, he would recognize
occupied Jerusalem
as the capital
of Israel
and the Israeli occupied Jolan Heights of Syria
as part of Israel. Trump
did that. I gave them Golan Heights. I
gave them the Abraham Accords. I recognized the
capital of Israel and opened the embassy in
Jerusalem.
And most importantly of all, I terminated the
Iran nuclear deal.
I was there 4 years, gave them 1,000,000,000
and 1,000,000,000 of dollars. I was the best
friend Israel ever had.
Today,
one of Trump's largest funders, giving him a
$100,000,000
is the widow of Sheldon Adelson, Miriam Adelson.
He promised
to recognize Jerusalem
and to move the embassy to Jerusalem.
Promised kept. He promised to withdraw from Iran
nuclear deal. Promised kept in Golan Heights. That
was a big gift.
He promised Golan Heights
and he recognized
Adelson
requested from Trump prior to this election
that once he was in the White House,
he would recognize
quote unquote Israeli sovereignty
over the West Bank. Donald Trump has given
the signal
that he will support this move to annex
the West Bank and establish
Israeli sovereignty
over it. Smotrich, the Israeli finance minister,
has come out and stated very clearly that
2,025
will be the year of sovereignty for Israel
over Judea
and Samaria, the word that he uses to
refer to the West Bank.
When we look at not only Miriam Adelson
as one of his key funders, we also
see other individuals
who are likely to be pushing Trump in
the same direction.
Isaac Perlmutter and his wife have also bankrolled
Donald Trump's presidential
campaign. Isaac Perlmutter
is a former Israeli
soldier and the former chair of Marvel
Entertainment. The same family
foundation
of the Perlmutters
that funded Donald Trump's ascent to the presidency
also funds the friends of the IDF and
illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank. Isaac
Perlmutter's wife
was on Donald Trump's inauguration
committee last time he was elected president.
So there's a good example.
Right? Literally talking about the inauguration. So is
it not possible that we're already seeing Israeli
entities packed in right this moment?
Obviously.
Another important source of funds in this presidential
campaign has been the company Uline headed by
Richard Uline, which contributed over $10,000,000
to the Trump campaign. Richard Uline
has a history
of funding organizations
which docked Palestinian and pro Palestinian students in
the United States. The companies backed by Uline
put the pictures and personal details of pro
Palestinian
students on the side of trucks. They sought
to get these students expelled from their university.
Another key funder of Donald Trump's presidential campaign
was the Andreessen Horowitz investment firm. Now Andreessen
Horowitz
is so deeply integrated
with the Israeli occupation
that it fund United States. The is backed
by U Line, put the pictures and personal
details of pro Palestinian students on the side
of trucks. They sought to get these students
expelled from their university.
Another key funder of Donald Trump's presidential campaign
was the Andreessen Horowitz.
I wanted to make sure you saw that.
K. This is who we're gonna talk about
next. That's Mark Anderson. That Mark Anderson or
Andrew however he's pronouncing it. Anderson Horowitz is
his company.
Recognize how concerning this is. That we're not
just talking about Thiel because even though Mark
Anderson and Thiel are very much overlapped with
all of this, that these people are immersed
with what Israel is doing. And they are
the ones now making the rounds about how
the democrats were trying to take over AI,
and they're trying to use this to take
over social media and AI bad, but Elon's
is good.
There's a reason this is all being flooded
around you right now.
I just can't stop seeing how clear this
is.
Investment firm. Now, Andreessen Horowitz is so deeply
integrated
with the Israeli occupation
that it funds
and partially
owns
several key Israeli intelligence companies like Tokka, which
was founded by the former head of Israeli
intelligence and former prime minister Ehud Barak. Tokka
claims that it is a one stop hacking
shop, which can hack not only smartphones
but also smart technology within homes and fridges
of individuals which governments may want to
know more about. Another company partially owned by
Andreessen Horowitz is Wiz founded by Asaf Rapaport,
a former high ranking officer
from unit 8200,
the military intelligence
signals
section of the
Israeli occupation forces. Woah. I'm totally surprised by
that. Crazy how that almost never happens. Right?
If you're just tuning in now, the joke
from before is that it seems to be
literally every time.
You know? So it's like, what a coincidence.
As I said before, it's a finite group.
It's not it is a it is a
it's like the CIA. There's a lot. Yeah.
There's a lot of overlap. But the point
is clearly,
if we keep seeing a unit 8200 member
leading these tech groups and we're told that
it's just a you know, it's obvious what's
going on. Then realize the larger point is
that Israel as well as these very entities
have expressed, actually, in the Prince and the
Spy article for Whitney around carbine 911, now
just called carbine, they make that explicit. She
has a whole section on that where they
say that their objective is to carry out
the interest of the Israeli government, the state
of Israel through these tech companies, whether or
not they're current IDF members or current Israeli
edge, intelligence
entities.
The point is that they're still acting that
way. And I argue like with the CIA,
there is no former in that in that
dynamic. So here is an organization
that is directly invested in Israeli intelligence
companies
also funding Donald Trump at the same time.
How could we not mention
Elon Musk? His company SpaceX
donated to the Donald Trump presidential campaign almost
a $120,000,000.
Now, what is Elon Musk's relationship
with Israel? What many do not know is
that his company SpaceX
launched several satellites
for
Israeli company ImageSat International.
Now ImageSat International
is not only led by reserves in the
Israeli military and former employees of Israel's largest
company Elbit Systems,
but it is a key source
for Israeli unit 9900
which is the Visual Intelligence
Unit. ImageSat International
and the spy satellites which have been launched
for it by Elon Musk.
So really quickly considering the point well, let
me finish real quick. Will be essential
to all of its bombing campaigns. So the
point right there is that this is exactly
the overlap. And this is just one aspect
of it, of of specifically Elon Musk's influence
or connection to the apparatus coming from Israel
that's happening in Palestine, that's happening around the
world in Ukraine, or and the overlap of
what he's doing with Starlink.
And realize that all of this is about
surveillance and data and and what we're discussing.
They're literally
cataloging all this information and are now watching
this administration step in that is driving the
support of this group and what they all
are connected with, the Zionist technocrat overlap, more
than anything I've ever seen before.
And with the border discussion, we just went
over the idea of using these things to
stop whatever they're pointing at when in reality,
they're just scooping up everything from you. This
is what's happening. And as always,
the Trump administration, whether Trump being in place,
is pacifying who would be the most resistant
to this. I'm calling on all the conservatives
out there that recognize the problem here to
have the courage to stand up and point
it out.
Maybe Trump is being played. Always possible. That's
exactly what happened last time, I'm told. So
maybe we should consider that.
In fact, historically, it's known that ImageSat International
have been a key part of Israel's
thousands
of bombing sorties
over Syria.
The fact that this was not seen as
a conflict of interest for Elon Musk to
at the same time be running
x formerly known as Twitter, but also launching
spy satellites
to assist in Israel's bombing campaigns is quite
indicative of a wider rot within our media
and political classes.
Another key funder of Trump is Primerica distribution,
which contributed $5,000,000
to his campaign.
Now, Primerica distribution
also funds the key Israel lobby group, the
ADL,
which has been found to have infiltrated
many
political
groups and spied on pro Palestinian
and Palestinian
Americans.
Trump also received another 5,000,000.
The investigation was done by the San Francisco,
district attorney's office. Among the data that came
out was that they would,
spy on organizations
that were critical of Israel, spy on organizations,
that were critical of South Africa.
And they would pass that information on to
Israel, and they pass the information on to
South Africa. This is apartheid
South Africa.
According to a declassified FBI document, one prominent
investigator working on behalf of the ADL was
Ray Bullock, a San Franciscan with the code
name Kao,
who posed as a small time art dealer
in the Castro District. Working clandestinely with Bullock
was Thomas Gerard, a detective with the San
Francisco Police Department's intelligence unit and a 3
year veteran of the CIA.
Bamford wrote that, quote, Gerard would illegally supply
Bullock with confidential data from the police and
FBI computer files about Americans,
many of them pro Palestinian activists that were
targets of the ADL. His report was then
submitted to the ADL's executive director in San
Francisco, Richard Hirschotte. Court documents ultimately exposed that
Bullock and or Hirschotte
admitted that the ADL or its agents gave
information to the government of Israel and sold
information to the government of South Africa,
including information secretly collected from Jewish peace groups.
Is that
anti semitic?
Really quickly, just to point James Lee is
we've interviewed him around ADL in general. It
does great work. The point is that that
point around the ADL seems very relevant suddenly
to what low key was talking about. And
the idea that it doesn't even have to
be some even though the reality is that
ADL, APAC, these are extensions of Israeli government.
As he makes clear in James' documentary around
that, it's about 23 minutes, I think. It's
it's worth your time.
Just look up his name in our in
this search bar of TLAB, and it'll pop
up. The point being
that the ADL objective, arguably a nongovernment
entity,
had access to CIA data. Was you I
mean, the point is, can't that clearly be
part of what's happening now? Maybe even without
Trump's knowledge.
Just making the same point. How obvious this
is throughout history
and more so now than ever. Dollars from
the investment firm Elliott Management headed by Paul
e Singer, a donor to the Friends of
the IDF, the Birthright Foundation,
and the Israel Independence
Fund. But more interestingly than that, Paul E.
Singer is the founder of the Startup Nations
Central Organization.
This is an organization
which has siphoned
former
employees of the Israeli military and particularly
Israel's unit a 200
into big tech companies.
This is that point, like a start up
nation point. That's where that that's that that
that's where that ultimately comes from. The idea
being that they're talking about with that very
premise
seeding through this industry with the exact with
the
is the intelligence overlapped idea. And that's it's
public, basically.
And we've talked about this in our as
Derek just wrote about in the article, about
50% of the entire market is openly run
but through from Israeli entities. So the question
is how much more of that is under
a guise of something else but still run
by influential or rather infiltrated entities?
In order to combat BDS
and also direct jobs within the tech sector
into Israel. Trump's policy in the region will
also call upon his reliable allies in Saudi
Arabia and the UAE.
Jared
Kushner, Trump's son-in-law,
is somebody that grew up so close to
Netanyahu
that when Netanyahu would come and stay in
New York, he would sometimes stay in the
bedroom of Jared Kushner. Under Trump Just in
case you're unaware, that is his daughter's husband.
I
mean, it's just it's silly how obvious is
it.
Sorry. I just hit the wrong button. Hold
on.
I'll get it. Hold on. Where was
it? We pass it.
Shoot.
Received another $5,000,000
pain in campaigns is quite indicative of visual
intelligence
Unit. ImageSat
International
are media
and political Damn it. Where did I leave
off on that? Another key funder of Trump
is Primerica Distribution, up nation central There we
go. Big tech companies in order to combat
BDS
and
also direct jobs within the tech sector into
Israel. Trump's policy in the region will also
call upon his reliable allies in Saudi Arabia
and the UAE.
Jared
Kushner, Trump's son-in-law,
is somebody that grew up so close to
Netanyahu
that when Netanyahu would come and stay in
New York he would sometimes stay in the
bedroom of Jared Kushner.
Under Trump's watch,
Kushner set up alongside the Saudi Arabian and
UAE governments
something called Affinity Partners. Kushner described it as
a corridor
for Gulf investment
in Israel. So, Affinity Partners, which was started
with Saudi and UAE money, 1,000,000,000 of dollars,
is now an owner
of Phoenix Holdings.
Phoenix Holdings is an Israeli investment firm which
partly owns Elbit Systems,
Israel's largest arms company. 85% of the drones
used by Israel on the West Bank and
Gaza come from Elbit Systems. Phoenix Holdings has
also sponsored and insured infrastructure and building projects
in illegal Israeli settlement and even provides the
funding
for a wind energy plant located in the
Israeli occupied Golan Heights of Syria.
So I'm gonna leave it there for just
because it's, you know, it's about 15 minutes.
Check it out for yourself. He's doing amazing
work on that. What's interesting to me is
how obvious this is. A lot of what
you've seen, the the clips and so on
will be in this thread that we've already
included for you from different points of Trump
pointing out how he will
on the side of what Israel
wants even if it contradicts your rights.
Here's another example that goes back to the
to 19 eighties. And we've played this many
times, very public, very, very real. Now I'll
it's in I'll have to read it for
the podcast because it's it's in, Hebrew, but
I I wanna make sure you see this.
So he's talking about currently Trump's administration. But
to the point that I think is important,
it's not unique to Trump alone. It's not
unique to Republicans alone. This is a government
influential,
I keep doing that, infiltrated concept. And this
is Netanyahu in the eighties openly saying in
his own media
that they can influence the US government. Easy.
So we don't have America with us, the
reporter says.
He says USA
Netanyahu responds saying USA is not a unified
plot.
We have the senate, he says, the congress,
and a a record strong Jewish lobby on
our side.
Know, of course, when we say it's a
Jewish lobby, you're you're called you're called racist.
Now, of course, even at the point to
recognize it means Zionism
is the main point. Now in this case,
it's obviously Jewish supremacy. That's what even B'Tselem
would highlight for you. But it's not just
about Jewish discussion. It's about anything Zionist influences
because that's what this is. It's a Zionist
entity that is using Judaism to hide what
it's doing. Saint there's more Christian Zionist in
the world today than Jewish Zionist.
So just to be clear, the point is
about Zionism as far as I'm concerned. That
overlaps with anybody being there. Whether Jewish or
Christian or Muslim, they're the same problem in
my mind. So to make sure that's under
but the point is that they use these
terms to make you go after that.
I think it's very obvious right now. There's
a lot of people in this conversation, Some
of which I even argue are being manipulated,
who think they're doing the right thing, who
are making this only about Jewish people.
I think you're being played, in my opinion.
The point though is that he's calling it
out right there. We have the senate,
record strong Jewish lobby on our side. We
have the senate and the congress, he says.
Yes. That's more prominent today than ever.
Congress.
Because we have a strong influence over the
general support in America.
America won't force us into anything. Yeah. We're
seeing that pretty clearly today.
Really, the question is how much do you
really need?
Now I'll include Derek's article from October 28th,
election 2024.
Zionist technocrats versus Zionist technocrats.
That's been the point we've been trying to
make. No matter who was chosen, selected by
the oligarchy to be the pretend elected president,
either way, it went in the same direction.
Now, I mean, that's the whole point about
this is this is set up in a
way that even if they somehow lost control
of the outcome, they still win. That's how
this is supposed to work.
And the point about the infiltration of tech,
which is exactly the point we're making around
this. I have the whole point in here
about carbine. And the overarching point we made
on August 13th. I titled the Israeli inter
the Israeli election interference and psychological operation industrial
complex.
This was a public discussion by Guardian and
plenty of other mainstream platforms calling out this
one guy
who by the way, in their own investigation
was proven to be an Israeli asset, who
was literally proudly discussing how he has influenced
what, 20 I think it's a 23 out
of 29 different presidential elections around the world.
That that means they tried for 29. And
23, they were able to put someone in
power that they wanted.
And and he mentions doing this in the
United States. Having bought farms and all sorts
of stuff. But let's continue to ignore the
obvious reality of where we are. Now to
bring this over into the conversation of AI
and Bitcoin, and this will be reasonably quick
because I want you to watch the this
discussion.
But this is, I think, overlapping points that
bring it back to what we're discussing today.
And some of which I wasn't able to
get in because we're you know, when you're
at a panel, I I it's I'm so
funny. I was thinking this earlier. I'm so
used to being able just to go and
might just run with what I'm thinking about
for 5 hours. You know, just jumping on
every here and then it connects with this
and it goes to that, and you as
you guys know. And so it's hard for
me sometimes when you're in the middle of
I really do have to temper myself because
it's important to have, you know, decorum and
show respect when you're with other people. Earlier
in my career, I think I was had
a harder time with that. More so now,
I think I'm getting better with, you know,
whether it's interviews myself or being involved with
other people. It's important. You you can't just
be about your discussion.
The point is that there's things in that
panel that I wanted to interject, but I
wanted to make sure we all got our
own you know, I just I can't make
it about just what I think. Right? But
I'll go over some of those points today
that just accentuate the point.
This wasn't called, if you didn't see in
the beginning, co opting freedom. The Bitcoin slide
of hand and the new AI control structure.
This is a 3rd AMI IMA panel. I
think I said 4th when we discussed it.
Worth your time. Very interesting. And and there's
different opinions all over the place.
I'll also include the conversation that goes to
the that same point.
Derek wrote this in August 1st, the co
opting of Bitcoin,
which is what we're gonna get into now.
And I want you to really consider how
this is one part of what everything else
we were just talking about, in my opinion.
And it says Bitcoin, Nashville, Peter Thiel, Donald
Trump, and Rumble.
So, here's the Bitcoin
white paper, which is important to read. It's
only 9 pages. I mean, a lot of
it's really technologically over my head in some
ways, but the main points are about what
is the premise around it.
And the thing that really stood out to
me, it says a purely peer to peer
version of electronic cash that would allow online
payments to be sent directly directly from one
party to another party without going through financial
institutions.
Basically, the main premise is that we in
in the current reality, we're required to rely
on 3rd trusted third parties, which that's just
what they call them. It doesn't in many
cases, we're talking about people that are not
remotely trustworthy
or groups. But that's what the game is.
Right? So you have to have a bank
in between. Well, the whole point of this
was to be able to do this without
them. Clearly, they don't want that. So now
you've got them stepping up and saying, we're
gonna use it as a strategic reserve and
save it and or and and to be
clear, we talk about this in the discussion.
And I I it's I started out by
highlighting it as a per as a as
a new,
strategic,
or the
reserve currency,
which we immediately bring it into the conversation
of specifically strategic reserve, which is what Catherine
was talking about. But I wanna be clear,
both have been floated
very clearly by Trump and others. And I
think right now, the shifting con the conversation
has really shifted into the idea of strategic
reserve. Not a strategic the reserve currency like
the petrodollar. But, see, they both inter they
both overlap because the oil aspect is the
strategic reserve. The petrodollar is the rather just
the dollar through that is the reserve currency.
My point though is that both were very
clearly floated.
But that's only saying that because it's important
to see that it can go. There's a
lot of opening conversation, but right now, more
so goes in the the idea of having
it in the background as some sort of
reserve currency.
But the point,
that's not even remotely what Bitcoin is about,
at least on paper, literally. Right? The idea
that we're taught or I guess, digitally these
days, but I I don't know if this
was originally paper or not.
If we're talking about having this become something
different than this, well, then why aren't the
community and then many of them are. The
community should be up in arms.
You're taking you're you're taking something that was
it's like pretending that Ron Paul wants you
to have some kind of statist conversation, you
know, or some kind of a, over like
like he suddenly wants the fed. Like, the
point is it's contradictory to the main point.
Obviously, what we're talking about is something that
challenges the system that doesn't now now it's
being used to bolster the system.
And I think that's an important point to
make. Because right now, what they're using this
for is is about trying to
insert themselves as the middle man.
Now, I think that's very concerning.
And these are just other articles that discuss
this Bitcoin as a reserve currency. And again,
as I said, you could look it up,
but there's others that have talked about it
as a as a strategic the reserve, oh,
see, actually, I take it back. So this
is the the point I'm making right now.
Confusing the terms on my mind. Here is
one of the arguments around reserve currency as
opposed to strategic reserve, which was the point
of the discussion in the panel. Sorry if
that gets confusing. I've mixed the terms up
a couple times. The point though is that
this is definitely part of what was being
discussed, whether that's happening now.
Trump's Bitcoin stockpile
plan stirs debate.
And here's what it says to one point
that stood out. If elected,
it will be the policy of my administration,
Trump says, to keep 100%
of all the Bitcoin the US government currently
holds.
Weird how you you don't say stole. Right?
Because that's what it is. Or acquires into
the future.
Quote, the core of the the strategic national
Bitcoin stockpile. So that's where this became the
next policy. The reserve currency part of that,
I think, is still out there somewhere. I
wouldn't be surprised if that actually becomes the
direction.
But
we're talking about money that's been stolen from
you under the guise that this is somehow
illegitimate or criminal.
But now you're gonna use it as a
reserve currency? Shouldn't that be immediately given back
to the people that you stole it from
and to the guys that it was a
crime?
Yes.
A huge portion of this is coming from
the Silk Road. The very person he claims
he's gonna let free the moment he comes
back into power.
I hope that does happen, but realize how
crazy he's referring to the Silk Road.
Then it goes on to say the US
government purchases 1,000,000 Bitcoin
around 5% of the total supply.
RF Kennedy Junior has suggested a government stockpile
for 4,000,000 Bitcoin. So right there, we're talking
about 4,000,000
on top of 1,000,000, or rather just maybe
4 in total. We're talking about 20,000,000 in
supply in general.
And the pro the one that can that
can concerns me, and I'm kinda jumping ahead.
Well, maybe not. Okay. Yeah. Perfect. This is
where the next thing we're gonna talk about
is is this conversation about the controlling and
aspect of this.
So if, let's say, they get 4,000,000,000 in
reserve, we don't know how much they already
have elsewhere.
BlackRock
has about
now I am jumping in.
Where the hell was that? Here we go.
Blackrock, I guess I'm not. See what I'm
talking about? I was jump ahead of myself.
So Blackrock,
as of November 26th,
has, you know, a little bit below half
a1000000.
And that's what we know and can prove
of Bitcoin.
You combine that with the what they just
took about a1000000 from the Silk Road dynamic.
You talk about the 4,000,000 reserve. I mean,
you're talking you're now you're talking 5, 6,000,000
with 21,000,000 in reserve. Okay. So that's not
half, but we don't know what else is
really there. So let me make this point
for why I'm concerned about this.
So here's a study called blockchain 51 Oh,
actually shouldn't have closed the Shoot, hold on.
I guess I don't need to bring it
back up again. In the in the smart
paper, or do you mean the the white
paper,
It highlights a specific term. Here we go.
Oh, I guess I can't search for this.
Yeah. Oh, well. It's it's the look through
the white paper. I'll read it from you
on the study. The point is that there's
a phrase that continually reiterates in this
with which is
the system is secure, and this is the
phrase, as long as honest nodes
collectively control more CPU power than any cooperating
group. Now, actually, that's not the let me
grab the what I wrote down. The one
the the phrase that seems to recur in
the whole thing is as long as honest
honest nodes control the network. Now if you
don't know what the nodes are, don't worry
about that for the context of the point.
Well, the point is to argue that if
right now the the white paper and whoever
Satoshi was, and actually, I'll I'll I'll quote
Mark Goodwin from Whitney's unlimited hangout website
where he argues he thinks this is a
intelligence asset.
He says, I must unfortunately now conclude that
the emergence of this system, Bitcoin in general,
immediately after the 2008 financial crisis and the
subsequent phase shifting adoption of Bitcoin by the
institutional authors and beneficiaries of the pandemic's financial
stimulus
was the work of a modern intelligence community
that has emerged
with Silicon Valley Technology. Think Startup Nation, Israel.
Meridian since at least the 19 eighties, but
unabashedly since the formation of the CIA's venture
firm In Q Tel just before the turn
of the millennium.
K? So what we're talking about is a
what arguably could be an intelligence asset in
general. Not all blockchain or all cryptocurrency, but
Bitcoin potentially.
A lot of people have worried about this.
I'm not so I'm not sure if I
think it's absolute or not. The point
is that in this white paper it says
as long as honest nodes control the network.
So, here's what the actual study says, and
the study's entitled Blockchain 51 Percent of Tax,
which is mentioned in the white paper. Lessons
learned for developers and trading platforms. So, it
says once purely theoretical, majority or 51% attacks
on public blockchains
have dealt participants
a reality check. The fundamental assumption of the
Satoshi's 2008 Bitcoin white paper that computing power
remains sufficiently decentralized in blockchain networks that rely
on a proof of work consensus mechanism. Now
the white paper does go on to explain
why that seems like it's likely to continue,
but it says,
can, in practice, actually be exploited to enable
double spending amongst many other manipulations.
Now it says and this is quoted. The
system is secure, from the white paper, as
long as a as honest nodes collectively control
more CPU power than any cooperating group of
attacker nodes.
Okay. So the obvious point, what happens
if that's not the case? If dishonest nodes
or entities control
more CPU power?
Now that's not the same as owning Bitcoin.
I I that's clear. But we're talking about
a com an entity that is trying to
control the market, it seems,
for their own purposes.
And that would go along with the mining
aspect that Trump already pretends is gonna only
be in the US, which is Jason laughs
about is not that's he doesn't understand how
that works.
That you can't control who mines this around
the world. But the point would be, obviously,
if you're going to make that the case
and and you would eventually create a circumstance
where you would control
collectively the majority of CPU power as well
as control the majority of bitcoin.
And then, that allows them to effectively manipulate
this. And potentially in a way that we
wouldn't even notice, I think, the average person
anyway.
I think that's very concerning.
So as we see them continue to shift
in this direction and the overlap with what
that means, and I haven't got into the
part that worries me the most, we can
see that this is beginning to become a
part of this technocratic foundation where this goes.
And also, the Prospera in Honduras.
The technocratic nightmare that I point to, guess
what?
It's using Bitcoin
and Starlink.
So I don't think that's a coincidence.
And realize that Starlink has been given by
Musk, but not for all Honduras, mind you,
but just for their location.
Oh, here's the, part that I highlighted. So
that's it says, what is a 51% attack?
And it says, a 51% attack is when
a malicious actor controls
a sufficient percentage of the network's computing power.
Doesn't even say majority, by the way, but
does say 51% attack. But a sufficient percentage
of the network's computing power, such that it
is able
to build and verify blocks
quicker than the rest of the network can,
resulting in the network accepting the attacker's version
of the blockchain as the truth. Now if
you read the white paper, that will make
more sense. Just read this as they'll be
able to put forward their lie as the
reality, and the system might not be able
to tell the difference.
At the very least, it'll be a the
you will be able to double spend money,
will be able to manipulate what you're putting
forward, potentially a lot more than that. Again,
I'm still a lot of this is outside
of my knowledge base as well. The reality
though is this is something that really stands
out as a potential concern.
And of course, BlackRock investing in this, I
think is an obvious concern. But I'll I'll
include the Cynthia Loomis post about the
strategic Bitcoin reserve legislation.
And here's what, TFTC
points out.
AI company, Genius Group,
adopts Bitcoin as its primary treasury asset with
plans to purchase a $120,000,000
in Bitcoin. Now, that's dollars, mind you. In
this context, we're talking about,
where was it? Yeah. This one was talking
about
4,000,000
Bitcoin.
Right? That's RFK Jr saying that. That's what
and Trump's saying the the 5% spike. That's
not about $1,000,000.
That's 1,000,000 Bitcoin. There's only 21,000,000 in circulation
according to the the information.
So this is saying that this AI group
is gonna use a $120,000,000
Bitcoin as their strategic asset, an AI group.
I think there's an important overlap there. And
it says, we see Bitcoin as being the
primary store value that will power these exponential
technologies.
Well, it not meant to be a lot
of a technocratic entity. It's about something that
is however you wanna use it. It is
currency that is not controlled by a power
structure, except when they do it like this.
Now, Financial Times simply says the delusions behind
a Bitcoin strategic reserve. So clearly,
I think it's obvious. Now there's obvious. I
have concerns. But what I think is obvious
is when you come at it from the
corporate media part of it, which then I
think is easily right now, a lot of
the republican team sports side of it is,
well, if they say it, the opposite is
true. How easy is to play it? So
they say this, they go, that's why we
need to do it. And it's as simple
as that. But there's more to it, obviously.
Just one thing I want to highlight. It
says, they would be held by the treasury
and couldn't start to be sold by until
4045.
So again,
unlike a traditional bank reserve,
this would be held by the treasury. So
not the fed. Okay? So here's the interesting
part about this.
The fed not being a part of this
is obviously something that a lot of us
want, but not because you're transitioning
to a new form of technocratic control. But
because we just get rid of the fed
because we recognize it's unconstitutional and it's not
a government entity, On and on and on.
Talk to Ron Paul.
To pretend that this is a good step
only to lead you into the next control
structure is exactly what I'm worried about. And
that doesn't have to be the case. I
hope I'm wrong.
But of course, in 4 2045,
the interesting timing there overlapping with a lot
of different conversations.
Then they start selling it. What does that
look like? Can they do can they can
they do it beforehand? Is this in written
in stone? You know, all this stuff is
very concerning.
Catherine Austin fits on Solari report.
The title is using Bitcoin and stable coins
to expand dollar dominance with Whitney Webb and
Mark Goodman. Now, Mark Goodman is the one
I just quoted earlier. The point though is
that this is exactly the problem.
The idea in what world should Bitcoin be
used to stabilize the thing it was meant
to destroy? At least on paper, right? It's
wild. Now, this is where it gets concerning
for me in 2 ways. The first step
is into CBDC,
the great reset, all the stuff that mainly
Republicans were calling out during COVID 19.
Trump calls central bank digital currency very dangerous,
which we all agree with. That's easy to
say
because the problem is I think what a
lot of us are beginning to pick up
on is it begins to appear that this
is gonna be a private coin,
which is worse in every possible way.
And that's the issue. Using this, what we
don't want,
be driving you. It's the whole point today.
After vowing to prohibit the Fed's digital dollar.
Right? So we're gonna stop the government version
and give you a privatized version from this
new
sufficient organized entity that's not part of the
gov like we're talking about earlier.
Some new technocratic entity run through Trump's administration
that's running up in Florida and his Mar
a Lago is I mean, with Israeli influence,
I mean, I'm just I'm kinda just spitballing
with that. The point is that's what I
see it as. In this case, fine. We'll
just do it our own version and they're
all gonna go, yay, the Trump coin. And
blindly sleepwalk right into that control structure because
you know that will happen for a lot
of people.
As Whitney wrote with Mark in July 29th,
Trump embraces the Bitcoin dollar, stabilize stable coins
to entrench US financial hegemony.
The opposite of what we should want.
And the point is that as they're pushing
back on this, right, he's over here going
bad. Digital currency bad. But here's mine.
Right?
World Liberty Financial. We I know we've highlighted
this already. It says, inspired by Donald Trump,
shape the a new era of finance. Be
defiant.
Sleep walk right into your totally not CBDC.
Now whether that takes that or not, my
point is any of these could play that
role. And we Whitney's talked about the potential
of j mo JPMorgan
and Jamie Dimon and the j you know,
that kind of dynamic or j JPMorgan coin.
All these are possible.
Just be ready to push back on these
things whether or not it comes from a
Trump Elon overlap if they go in this
direction.
If that's what you want, anyway. My argument
is that most Republicans are clearly against most
of this stuff.
Now this is where the ending point that
gets most concerning for me, and how that
overlaps with the Freedom City point is this
artificial intelligence overlap. Now there's somebody that I
met, I told you earlier in Sedona. I
had this really great conversation with. He's apparently
writing a book about this whole topic right
now. Very, very intelligent guys. Younger guys, like,
26, 27. He's writing he's apparently writing this
book about
the two angles of this. The very concerning
aspect of Bitcoin itself for this very reason.
This is specifically about not just all blockchain,
but Bitcoin and its blockchain. And not this
article, but what he's talking about. But this
article says the UAE
and their blockchain powered carbon tracking.
This is one of the things he brought
up. Now, but this is on the earliest
edge of this. We're talking about some basically,
one of the main points he's getting at
is that this is a system.
And is apparently
some well beyond what most of us even
recognize
that could very well be used to wildly
benefit the population, which even myself, I'm like,
I don't know. I'm very on guard about
any of that because I'm just you know,
it's it's like the being afraid to go
to hospitals after COVID. It's like we're like,
woah, I'm gonna on very far on the
side away from all these terrible things even
though in some cases that's your detriment. Right?
My point is that I'm very, very on
guard about seeing any positive in arguing that
some kind of crypto
blockchain technocratic idea could somehow benefit the future.
You guys need a very I need to
see results before I ever go into something
like that, no matter how good it looks
on paper, just because of where I what
I see in the world. Nonetheless,
he is very adamantly arguing that these very
could
this could be applied in a way that
could be create utopia.
At the same time and again, I don't
know if I agree with that, but at
the same time, he's also showing me the
worrisome parts of it. Saying that, look, look
at how dangerous that can go. So that
makes sense to me in a lot of
ways. The same analogy of a hammer or
the Internet. Right? It could build the hammer
could build a house or it could bash
your head out. It's about the application,
in most cases.
So what he's saying is that what we
can see is stuff like this, on the
early side of it. Using these kind of
blockchain powered ideas to exponent using artificial intelligence
and algorithms start to track you in every
way, carbon tracking being an early aspect of
this. Which wouldn't make sense to a lot
of Trump supporters but that's gonna be a
part of it. I mark my words. But
on top of that, the larger concerning point
that simply bitcoin in a way just becoming
artificial intelligence.
Or in a way already sort of that
and it's being applied in a way like
it is not just about the currency if
at all. That's simply the gateway part of
it. Now, this is already floating. Like I
said, this is so, my point in saying
all that is that I'm gonna I'm planning
on interviewing him coming up next month, I
think. We put it off a little bit.
And they have this this kind of course
they're doing around kind of talking and it's
like a kind of like a,
symposium in a way about
specifically understanding bitcoin and all that. And I
think I could learn a lot from it.
And they've offered to let me watch it.
So my point is I'm gonna immerse myself
in this to hopefully better understand this and
we're gonna interview him down the line. Long
way of just simply saying that I think
this will add a lot more to this
conversation.
And hopefully, I'll learn a lot more about
this. And of course, being very skeptical about
whether they're even having good intentions. Right? That's
how we always have to apply ourselves to
this. So coming back to the point,
Forbes,
from January 2, 2020,
artificial neural networks for blockchain. Now, this is
not just about using
artificial intelligence to say, predict the price of
bitcoin, which is what you look this up,
you'll find a 1,000 articles about. It's more
than that. Maybe not this article here, but
the general point. Neural networks, like artificial brain
mapping, neural networks kind of things or rather
using a sort of map out other things.
And how this could be built into something
that could become an artificial intelligence application.
And then exponentially start growing in a way
that is beyond our understanding.
So, first of all,
documenting bitcoin simply goes, hey, look artificial intelligence
programs like chatgpt.
The one that that, you know, like the
the grok verse chatgpt,
right? Have learned how to send bitcoin payments.
Like, I don't think we even really understand
how alarming that is and what that means.
That's a huge difference. I mean, that now
we're talking with transacting amongst themselves.
Like, online,
that's on that's unlimited.
Like, if literally, you have these now, what?
Can they start making money? Can they sell
NFTs
and start transacting amongst themselves? Start buying property?
I mean, what does that look like? You
realize how terrifying that is in a long
term way? And it says, to put this
into words, machines can pay other machines. Guys,
that should be truly terrifying.
And this is where this is beginning to
go. I don't think this is by accident.
And here's a clip, and we'll get into
these clips from from Mark Anderson. Don't forget
the immersed influence and overlapping with the Israeli
state, the genocide,
the AI aspect of this, and Trump's administration.
So I'll play this clip, and I'll read
you what David Icahn to say about this
because this is being floated for obvious reasons
right now.
General intelligence will be will emerge. And who
knows how that affects? I I've said publicly,
and I'm kind of half joking Yeah. That
we need AI government. Yeah. You know? I
it sounds Or technocrats that pretend it's artificial
intelligence and simply feed you through this machine.
Right? Like, whether feeding data into it, they
put outputs the certain way they want or
just simply pretending to be like, this is
as you referenced in the in the interview,
Eric Schmidt, a long time ago, not that
long ago, floated the idea, Whitney and I
talked about this in the past,
that one day we'll get to a point
where AI will be telling us what we
should be doing in foreign policy. It may
seem immoral to us, but the AI will
know better. And I'm paraphrasing. But that's that
is what his general sentiment was. Then we'll
get to a point where we just have
to let them decide because they know better.
Like, gosh, that's terrifying.
Here we are. We're we're about to come
into a situation where that starts to be
the case. Look at what's happening in Israel.
Just very quickly jump ahead and I'll come
back to these. We'll end with these points.
This is already happening, guys. They're literally already
using AI to dictate who gets killed in
Gaza.
And they're now using that as sort of
a sidestep to say, well, the AI chosen.
Catherine makes a great point about that. You
know, we've said this a long time ago,
actually, when this first came out. This one
right here.
In October 9th,
or excuse me, November 30th, I was like,
god, this makes sense. November 30th.
We talked about it at the time, and
we said, look, right now we can tell
that they're starting to act like, well, the
AI decided. So we're not accountable, we were
just following orders from the AI. At some
level, you could still order the you know,
claim the person who instituted it will be
accountable, but this is a huge step away
from accountability for their genocide. And that's part
of what's happening here.
Easy to say. Yep. But instead of I've
said publicly, and I'm kind of half joking
Yep. That we need AI government.
Yep. You know? I it sounds crazy to
say. Yep. But instead of having this, like,
alpha chimpanzee that runs the tribe Ear mark
in the back? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Of course.
Yeah. A few more. How about we have
some, like, really logical
fact based Yeah. You know, program
Yeah. That Who dictates that? Who makes it?
Right? Who gets to decide whether it's logical?
Who we vote on that? How's that work?
Like, how do we not think I mean,
look. I'm sure maybe he has thought about
this. This is just an idea he's floating.
But this is so alarming that we have
such a blind spot here where we would
have to rely on exactly the people I've
been pointing to this entire show for what
we're talking about here.
I would much rather have something that I
can literally look at and shake a hand
or you know what I mean? Like, we're
talking about something that is so far beyond
what we think we can what we know.
Like, we can't control this.
We're talking about hacking. We're talking what happens
if someone hacks the president? Right? I mean,
it's so ridiculous. I can't even I can't
even give this honest engagement.
The problem is that this is not what
will happen, I think. It's about trying to
use this to get you to think that's
the case.
You know, makes it, like, really reasonable and
equitable in a way that we can all
agree to. Let's govern things in that manner.
Right. So you can actually simulate this today
because you Really quickly, by the way. Isn't
the point is right now, the team sport
politics side of this, they already think that.
We're the right reasonable side, and they're the
crazy ones. Do you think that we all
just acknowledge that we're crazy, but we're okay
with that? Most people convince themselves that their
lunacy is okay.
And that's not mostly, I argue not because
they wouldn't organically be that way. It's because
they've been propagandized since birth,
like in Israel or the United States, to
be very specific types of manipulators.
So the idea that he's saying that we
could eventually get to a place where it's
just so reasonable we all agree, what world
are you talking about?
If there was just some reasonable entity to
control by nobody, first of all, that's terrifying.
Even if it's reasonable. It's just some kind
of we're not in good but on top
of that, you know that that's not ultimately
the way it will go. Somebody's gonna be
behind that. So at the end of the
day, there's gonna be some influence there and
people will disagree because that's how human nature
works.
But it seems like a very alarming way
to float this idea as some kind of
benevolent AI ruler.
Wake up, Republicans. This should be concerning to
you, especially if it was Kamala Harris saying
this. You can go on these systems, shed
GPT or Claude or these others. And you
can you can ask, you know, how should
we handle issue x? How should this be
relevant? Yeah. We've done that. Right. How should
the Department of Energy do whatever, nuclear policy
or whatever? And what I find when I
do that is I discover 2 things. Number
1, of course, these things are these things
have the same problem social media has had,
which is they're tremendously politically biased and Right.
You know, that's on purpose and they they
need to fix that, and that's gonna be
a big topic in the next several years.
But the other thing you learn is if
you can get through the political, basically, bias
and censorship, if you can actually get to
a discussion of the actual issue, it's you
get very sophisticated answers. Yes. Right? And very
But think about what he just said. What
what think about what he just said.
Intentionally biased. And we have to fix that.
Fix it how?
So the people that chose to use biased
information, or worse, didn't know that, are gonna
fix it? You realize that's not a
technological problem. That's a person problem. So you're
gonna fix it by what? Make having new
people do it who you think are better?
What if someone disagrees?
That's not a problem that can be solved.
You see what I'm saying? There will always
be personal opinion influence on that unless you
create something that makes don't mind up. And
that's terrifying.
Logical, very straightforward, and it will explain every
aspect of the issue to you, and it'll
take you through all the pros and cons.
Yeah. And, you know
I mean, it might be the way to
go Yeah. Which is so horrifying for people
to think because everyone's worried about the terminators
taking over the world. And they're like,
that's the first
step as we let them govern us. Well,
look, there's nothing stopping a a politician from
using this. There's nothing stopping a policymaker from
using it, you know, as a tool. Right.
You start out at at the very least,
you start out using it as a tool.
There's nothing to prevent. You know, like, for
example, I think military commanders in the field
are gonna have basically AI battlefield assistance that
are gonna advise the most strategy tactics.
This is already happening.
We're watching this in Israel right now. This
is not it's just stuff that we're not
being we're not privy to. It's already happening
for a long time. The idea of DARPA,
we've so we've talked about this universal soldier
discussion. This goes back a decade or more.
It's already going on. Now, whether that is
AI like we imagine or just some kind
of algorithm or just some kind of who
knows?
We realize this is them floating like we
point out with everything.
Floating like some distant fantasy future, things they've
done for 10 years. You don't think he
knows that?
Yes. Right. How to win conflicts and then
it'll start to work its way up and
then they'll be doing, you know, work planning.
And then if you're a general, if you're,
you know, a sergeant or a colonel or
a general, it's gonna just mean you perform
better. Yes. And so maybe there's, like, you
know, the human them sort of man machine,
kind of symbiotic relationship. And you could imagine
that happening more in the in the policy
process, in the in the political process.
That's terrifying. Here's David I had to say.
What have I been warning? Rogen and AI
billionaire, Mark Anderson, who have blocked me on
Twitter for whatever reason, both big mates with
Musk, agree on the need for AI government
to replace politicians. This is straight off the
pages of the cult agenda and Musk is
going to press for AI to make government
more efficient. Now that's already happening, guys. Like,
this now realize, he's not talking about who
knows? Maybe right out of the gate. But
I don't believe he's talking about
proposing AI run the country. But what you're
going to see, which is almost impossible to
miss, is using artificial intelligence to make government
more efficient. And there you are again with
the premise of today, pointing to a problem
that we all know exists that they created
that they're gonna solve
by using the next step. And maybe that
quote, solves the problem
as you perceive it in the moment, but
now you're stuck with an artificial intelligence who
is dictating what you are and aren't allowed
to do or say. That's where this goes.
And again, whether that's them inputting it from
behind with what they want you to think
or not doesn't change what your life will
be like.
That comes along with digital IDs, social credit,
Internet access. We all see this coming.
If you think somehow magically it's only gonna
be applied to people that you don't like,
you're you're gonna fall into the same trap
that we've always fallen through in everything we've
ever talked about. Censor them. They're the bad
ones and it swings right back around and
gets you next time.
AI to make government more efficient is already
on the table.
Can you start to see why these people,
including Rogan, have been given such a profile?
So transparent, yet so few can see where
they are being taken while thinking we're winning
over and over and over.
This person simply highlights some of these points.
And you're seeing in any interview,
he revealed that the government is kicking people
off begging networks. Oh, my God. Breaking news.
Guys, this has been happening for a while.
Now, yes, there's more examples. But what I
find interesting is what he points to.
Or was it?
Yeah. So this is the same this I'll
scoot this one over.
Insurrection Barbie again. Oh, it's just so funny.
These people, they love to, you know, highlight.
Like, okay. Look look at this following now.
741,000,000
followers.
Like that's
You realize from when they took over and
these people were pandering, you know, everything Elon
does. Oh my God, you're so great. You're
gonna save everybody from everything. And then boom,
they're they've 5 times over have increased their
following.
Oh, maybe they believe it. I don't know.
But I think it's funny that these are
the people, these pandering circle of him, he
is he loves he loves the yes men.
As he was surrounded, he was like, yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. And maybe that's why he has
to fail 45 times where he can succeed.
But it says that the she says, Mark
Anderson recently told us,
you know, the AI technocrat,
30 tech founders, many of whom were heavily
involved in cryptocurrency, were debanked.
How strange that Sam Bankman Fried was never
debanked.
My point is, guys, we don't have any
context or the point is that debanking is
clear. That's around.
These 30 tech founders. So, of course, it
could mean that they're trying to do something
that counters the government agenda, but realize that
he is the government agenda. And so he's
pointing at other tech founders that were debanked
without true without really giving you context, and
all we're talking about is people like Elon
Musk, Bill Gates. Those are tech founders. Those
are Silicon Valley entities. Do you care if
they're debanked? Not to say that my obviously,
we should. I care that's happening in general.
My point is without the framing it like
this makes it sound like some kind of,
like, startup entities, they're fighting for your freedom,
and they got deepened.
It just kills me. They're they're literally presenting
the insider deep state as the people fighting
the deep state.
Of course, Elon says, that does seem odd.
Given that unlikely the at least the way
he responds is so funny to me. Unlike
the founders, Anderson referred to who were debanked,
Franklin
Sam Bankman Fried was massive broad.
You mean the entirely constructed story that we
all saw play out in front of us?
Are we gonna pretend like he's not equally
involved with fraud or you for that matter?
That does seem interesting. Let me ponder on
that for a moment. Let me reiterate your
point back to you.
700,000,000 followers.
It's just so funny how this works. Now,
here is a thread of all these. The
main ones made here
is about social media.
And proposing as the future that this will
be the way it works.
This is very concerning. According to Gemini, the
Hitler had an excellent DEI policy. Yeah. Now
in reality, he did not.
And it's important to understand that in reality,
he did not. But, yeah, Gemini
happily threw up black Nazis because it's because
it's bi they programmed it to be biased.
They programmed it in a political direction. Yeah.
And that's not the algorithm's fault. That's the
person's fault. So you don't change that. There
will always be that. There's a guy, David
Rosato, who's been doing these analyses on the
social media side, where he shows the, incidence
rates of the rise of, like, all of
the woke, like, language, like, in the media.
And there's similar studies that have come out.
Of course, he only means to the left,
even though there's woke politics on both sides
of the paradigm that end up in the
same position, censorship, suppression, and so on. For
the AI where you there there's there's studies
that have been done that basically show the
political orientation of the LMs because you can
ask them questions. You can ask them questions
and they'll they'll tell you. And they're just
like 9 out of 10 of them are,
like, tremendously biased.
And then there's a handful that aren't.
And then there's tremendous pressure. This is one
of the threats from the government is, is
the government basically going to force our startups
to come into compliance, not just with their
trade rules, but also with all of their
right, base base essentially a censorship regime on
AI that's exactly like the censorship regime that
we had on social media. Wow. That's terrifying.
So the and by the way, I love
how this guy seems to try to, like,
absorb the soul of the microphone.
But
the point
is is you're talking about some kind of
structure.
Right? Personally, I don't know how I I
I obviously don't like the idea of any
government dictating what you can and can't do.
And I don't I'm not I'm honestly, I
don't even know where I stand when it
comes to this. This is the wild west
about where AI goes. But think about the
alternative of either side of this. Right? So
on one side of it, you've got the
idea that you're talking about AI being rolled
out by Israeli start up companies, by people
like this, by you know, basically basically with
no guardrails. Like, he's just and yet over
here, you got him saying, well, they want
to apply their metrics and framing it through
the idea of social media manipulation
as if that's just a Democrat thing.
You realize these people are leaning into the
bottom barrel narratives because this is being used
against you. That's what I think.
The point is he's not stupid. He's well
aware of the fact that's not he probably
is well aware of the fact that that's
all BS anyway.
Clearly, I can prove to you 40,000 different
ways that Republicans have censored just the same
as Democrats. Now the game is to pretend
that that was their censorship model. It wasn't.
It was the US government model that was
applied in a 1,000 different ways that crossed
the paradigm barrier.
So to frame it as they're gonna use
it the same way, what that does is
makes republicans in this context push back on
controlling the way AI comes out.
Now, again, who knows whether we should I
don't again, it's a conflict it's a complicated
point for me especially.
Because I'm I'm gonna say right now, I'm
not going to side on the idea that
the government should be dictating what you can
and can't do. But I do argue that
these things were coming the AI part of
it that government is employing,
well, yeah, then we do have a right
to point it out because they're supposed to
be acting for you.
They're supposed to be your representatives, not the
other way around. So that's my point. It's
not about individuals playing fun AI out in
the world. It's about how this is being
built for your control structure. And you're damn
right we have a right to dictate how
that used how it's used in your life.
See my point? So here we are, where
he's trying to convince you that we shouldn't
have guardrails on how this goes out because,
you know, democrats and censorship and so on.
Is it really that easy?
Yeah. Exactly. And yes. And and and this
is my belief and what I've been trying
to tell people in Washington, which is if
you thought social media censorship was bad, this
has the potential to be a 1000 times
worse. Oh, so you're talking to the people
that literally censored us.
Right? If you thought that was bad that
you did, this is gonna be worse. They're
going hooray. Alright. Perfect.
And the reason is social media is important,
but at the end of the day, it's
it, you know, it's quote just people talking
to each other. AI is gonna be the
control layer on everything.
Right? So AI is gonna be the control
Is that what you want?
You realize we don't have to make this
the case, guys.
But this is how this works.
We can't let the democrats make it the
way they want, so we have to hurry
and get it out the way we want
it.
Again, I just we can't be this simple.
Layer on how your kids learn at school.
Right? It's gonna be the control layer on
who gets loans. It's gonna be the control
layer on does your house open when you
come to the front door. Wow. It's gonna
be the control layer on everything. Right? And
so, yeah, that sounds terrifying.
So let's ask for the Musk version where
that only applies when you're a democrat.
I mean, guys, this is silly. Like, the
reality is that's nobody should want that. Why
we want to build that future is ridiculous,
in my opinion, at the very least. And
I like, I'm sure there are people that
disagree.
I just don't my point is no matter
what intentions you go into this with, you
will build a structure that at some point,
by somebody,
can end up that way.
I don't want that. I don't know why
anybody would want that. And you're watching people
that are literally the high the insider examples
of a deep state structure who are walking
this out for you like they're part of
the outsider force fighting for your freedom
simply because a few insider billionaire technocrats
said so.
Well, if that gets wired into the political
system the way that the banks did and
the way that social media did, like, we
are in for a very bad future.
We breathe on this thing.
Give us a guy some mic training. So
I think what's crazy about it is that
this is being here's the back.
Just stressing this. He says, this is how
the deep state works, pointing to the deep
state. When they can't censor your speech or
freeze your financial transactions directly, they pressure private
companies that they regulate to do it through
the backdoor instead. Well, yeah. You're right.
And you're working with all of them.
Literally, the people who made PayPal, who stole
$6,000 from me. Or if thou I mean,
these are exactly the point, guys. Or Israel's
influence through all of it. You included.
He says this is called fascism. You're right.
The only answer is to shut it down.
I I agree. Finally, we agree, Vivek. Shut
it all down. Don't build something else in
your bit in your image behind it. Let's
just stop doing it. But you see, they
don't want that. They want their flavor of
of government. They want their flavor of control
structure. See, I really wish we had more
influence on the conversation right before the election.
Maybe we should be asking for none of
it.
But you see, they'll never give you that
because that removes their power. If they were
really about trying to create what Americans want,
it would look quite a bit different. What
they're doing is what their team sport politics
want.
Andrew Torba, the CEO of Gab, made a
really interesting point.
Now actually
yeah. I think this is redundant for what
we just played. Overall, the thread is all
in there for you to look at them
all.
This one's interesting because this has to do
with bots,
specifically from Israel.
He writes, thank you for mentioning Gab. Actually,
I'll play it first since you mentioned him.
Well, I I also found it fascinating that
when there was any sort of a right
wing branch of that stuff like Gab or
any of these, they would immediately be infiltrated
by bots as well, like my friends, the
troll on Blue Sky. Now realize, he rightly
said bots.
Okay? So, that's manipulation. That's not that Gab
is full of Nazis or Bitshoot is full
of Nazis. That is, in my opinion
well, it's it's manipulation. I think that's obvious.
But in my opinion, that is a very
clear Israeli ADL manipulation.
This and this this is not just because
Israel is the focus in some ways. Historically,
it's overwhelmingly
proven. They fake Nazi marches. They actually, there's
a point I'll get to in a second
right here. Where they're faking Nazi attacks in
order to justify that they're being oppressed as
as Jews. I mean, it's it's not to
say that there's not racism. There obviously is.
My point is you can prove this. Israeli
media has covered this, how they have faked
this to rationalize action. So my point in
this is he says bots. Listen to the
response. But these are Nazis. Like, these are
Nazi bots. These are people that would just
spew horrible hate, and then Gab would Bots
though. So fake people, arguably, not even arguably.
You wouldn't create a bot to do that
if that's what you believed, you would just
go on and say it. So it means
that you're trying to project
that that's the case.
Be labeled, oh, this is where the Nazis
go. This is a That's the zone. A
right wing psychopath,
you know, social media app. Yeah. Being done
by the group that's completely immersed within the
current administration, pretending to fight that. I think,
frankly, I think you get the same thing
if you start out if I think if
you start out overtly political on either side,
I think that's what you end up with.
Yes. And so I think You realize he
just completely skipped over the bot part. What
he's talking about is that you end up
with a nazi Rickstream this platform. Well, no.
That's not the case when you start with
politically biased ends. Well, that's Twitter for you.
That's any platform. It's all politically biased in
a 1,000 different ways. What you're talking about
is a deliberate misinform a manipulation
of a platform that, I guess, arguably tried
to not go that direction, to be real
free speech. And they bomb it with all
sorts of Nazi bots and everything else in
order to make it look like that's what
real free speech looks like, so we can't
allow it. And realize as much as the
democrat side was floating, we have to remove
free speech. Donald Trump and the rest are
actually calling for that in your context of
Israel and anti semites and whatever else. And
that's what they're putting forward. We can't allow
that because that's bad stuff. That's not left
or right. That's your government. Edge there like
that that that doesn't seem to be an
effective route to market.
It seems like you have you have to
start from the beginning as a general purpose
service, but but you need to have some
sense of the actual guardrails you're gonna have
around. And by the way, every so See,
he cut short right there because he recognized
he was touching on something that we are
all pushed back on. Guardrails on what you're
allowed to say.
That's not free speech. Even if you think
that's what we need and maybe you do.
Seems to be most people today. At least
to to be honest and say you believe
in limited speech, which is okay. We can
disagree on that. But I believe in absolute
free speech. Do you have a right to
say what you want
or think what you want? That used to
be called freedom.
And so if the actual card and by
the way, actual guardrails you're gonna have around
and by the way, every social media service,
Internet service that ever works, there's always some
content Yeah. And restrictions because you can't have
child porn, you can't have Right. Violence, you
can't We see the difference, those are crimes.
That's apply that applies anywhere.
You can't have child porn anywhere in the
world. That's a crime. Right? So you see
how they love to conflate these things? There
are already crimes that exist. We all know
that you can't break the law. Now there's
points to be made within that conversation too
about unjust or unconstitutional laws. That's different. That's
for another point. That's an important conversation though
that applies. But in this case,
he's pointing to criminal action.
That's not the same thing.
I can go on these platforms and say
all sorts of things. Then somebody can go
on Twitter and say, I like child porn.
They're allowed to say that, and I can
say, you're disgusting.
But that's free speech.
You see, what they're doing is trying to
conflate these real world actions because the idea
is they want you to believe that worlds
are violence. This is the right side of
the conversation, guys.
Have terrorist recruitment. Right. And even the first
amendment, there's like a dozen carve outs. The
supreme court has ruled on over time. There
are things like that that you Yeah. Ridiculous.
Right? So let's be clear. Supreme court can
make rulings all they want. That does not
change the reality of the inherent dynamic. Now,
again, I can point to another ruling from
Mayberry Madison. Anything repugnant to the constitution is
null and void,
which seems to be a very stand that's
like a standing that's going on. The point
is, you could point to other rulings
and argue that that changes the conversation. Maybe
it does.
I'm still of the mind that there is
an inherent reality which is what the basis
is and that anything contradictory to that is
non existent. Non null and void was the
ruling from Mabry Madison in 9 1892, I
think.
To the idea that you could pretend that
there's all these carve outs. Well, all you're
saying is you believe in limited speech and
that you believe that this document
can be altered, and that's not the case.
You don't have an inherent god given rights
if you could vote to remove them. Right?
This is the bastardization of everything we think
we understand in this country. And people like
this are using it to try to sound
logical. Alright? Sound just. What they're doing is
slowly eroding what you believe in by using
words that seem to make sense. In this
context, they're trying to argue hate speech, guys.
That's what those car belts are. Do you
believe in that?
I don't think you do. But I think
you believe that somehow this is where we
I I think it's to leave it on
the point, I think it's easy to see
how e that we could fall into this
trap.
It's not an insult. It's easy because this
sound this can sound like it makes sense,
but we need to air on our principles.
Yeah. Just like say. Right? I can't say
let's go join ISIS and let you know.
Let's go attack. Yeah. You can though. See,
this is the problem. Yes. You're allowed to
say I can do I can do whatever
I want. I can join a group that's
illegal.
If you join that group, then that's a
crime. But you see, when they start to
make it an illegal argument to say I
think this or I wanna do that, that's
crossing the line.
Even if there are laws in place to
say you're not allowed to say that. My
point is that's not a constitutional
legal action, even though it's a law. It
is contradictory. That's the point. So we're we've
gotten even like I point out with the
fire in a theater dynamic, guys,
You may argue the logic makes sense and
maybe you think it does. Maybe it does.
I still argue it's the person's responsibility who
takes action.
So if you could say
the point is if I stand up and
say that because I thought there was a
fire, what happens if it turns out not
to be? Am I suddenly irresponsible?
No. I thought I was doing right. The
point is you obviously see that it comes
down to responsibility,
personal responsibility.
I will always air on the side of
absolute free speech because that's what it means.
This
this is logic.
This is
technocratic authoritarian
direct I guess, a a technocratic authoritarian direction
masquerading as logic. I I mean, that's just
specific to today. Just taking the free speech
aspect, it's a violation of your rights masquerading
as logic. Washington, like, it's just it's literally
not not allowed. So there there's always some
controls, but you need to have, like, a
spine of steel
if you're gonna hold back the the the
the the censorship pressure. And and, you know,
there's basically,
Substack,
you know, company I'm involved, you know,
doing very well. You know, small I love
Subs smaller than Twitter, but doing extremely well.
Fantastic. And they Yeah. When does that shoe
drop, by the way? You've done a great
job, I think, of holding the line on
this. Yes. And then, obviously, and it's an
amazing resource. There's so many brilliant people on
Substack.
So here's what the CEO of Gab had
to say. So thank you for mentioning Gab,
Joe Rogan. You might be surprised to learn
that once we banned
Israeli IP addresses, the vast majority of this
bot behavior you described stopped
because that's where it was coming from. Now,
whatever your thoughts on that. I don't agree
with blanket bans of any country because that
affects people that are just Israelis. They have
nothing to do with this. Whether Jewish or
not, by the way, because they exist there
too.
What's interesting though is to clearly show why
that's relevant in the conversation of today.
That Israel is it has an oversized role
in well, in the tech field, in regard
to the startup dynamic. You and and not
even just the tech world, by the way.
That's even bigger. But just the spyware focus.
Almost 50% on the record.
So we can see this kind of overlap,
or the the censorship or what was it?
The, election interference industrial complex.
That's what we're talking about. These bot armies
and their influence or manipulation of outcomes of
elections. So when he start when they banned
IP addresses from Israel, boom, just like that,
the problem stopped. I'm sure you can connect
those dots. It says they also tried spamming
the site with porn, which we've all seen,
which we prohibit.
And that ended too.
He thinks so if Elon cared about where
this was all coming from, all those porn
bots we're seeing in the DMs, all the
other censorship,
this would make a difference.
I don't I think they know what's happening.
It says more often than not, the email
addresses behind many of those accounts were traced
to Jews LARPing as violent Nazi extremists too.
Now I would simply argue he's talking about
Israeli entities,
Zionist, but he spoke, so he maybe he
specifically was talking about Jewish people. You can
decide what you think about that. The point
though is that we're talking about whether Jewish
people or specifically Israeli government entities or Hasbar
entities
pretending to be Nazi extremists. That is the
historical reality.
Mark is right as well. It says you
need a spine of steel with no and
no one better than Gab has demonstrated that
spine. We didn't cave to ADL, the mainstream
media, congress, or foreign nation states. To this
day, we are the sole social media platform
that has no hate speech policy unlike x,
Rumble, and others. Well, not not Bitchute as
far as I can tell.
The point
I find is obvious.
And he says, as I was saying,
here's an example.
Jonas Vesterberg is pointing out that a whistleblower
now take this for what you will. A
whistleblower who worked closely with Rady Fine
for more than 5 years is coming out
with highly incriminating
testimony. You can listen to it right here.
Saying she states that she that he, Randy
Fine, uses paid actors to pose as Nazis.
These fake Nazis are called up to participate
in stage, mock attacks, and harassment against spying.
He then uses that to leverage for more
media attention.
Now you you could decide for yourself. It
could be just as easy this person would
say this because they have a political he's
their adversary. Maybe they wanna somebody else wants
to win the election. Either way, this is
a provable reality that has taken place that
there's Israeli media has covered extensively.
Oh, that's funny. They point oh, look at
that. How funny is that? So by the
way,
this is what the one of these this
is the not the Patriot front. I forget
what this one is called.
These these in my opinion, these are fake
Nazi groups. I'm I mean, it's in my
opinion, there's been 45 examples showing you that
they end up revealing themselves.
One one not least of which is this
guy. It's so funny. This happens to pop
up as we're looking down. This is the
guy used to be called Handsome Truth. Maybe
he still does.
If you don't remember that, this guy was
literally the one going through everybody's chats and
forcing trying to bomb your chats and making
saying, name the Jew and trying to force
you to make it about Jewish people. That's
not an accident.
Now here he and he was by the
way, the entire time his narrative was, I'm
not racist. I'm not against Jewish people. I'm
just trying to show you that this is
here he is with a Nazi symbol behind
him cheering about, kill all the Jews. It's
like, guys, it's so obvious that this stuff
is being constructed.
I just think that's hilarious.
And also very terrifying because this is it
does have real world re reaction to it
and that your government is probably
it there's 2 ways about it. They're aware
you're this is a play, and they're still
gonna use it against you, or they're not
aware, and that's almost more alarming. Either way,
this is being driven by foreign entities. Now
Censored Man highlights this back, and this was
on June 12th, but it was the point
about Twitter.
They literally started working with a group called
CHEQ,
former Israeli intelligence
officer, Guy Tunovich, who's the CEO.
Surprise, surprise. Another unit 8300 Israeli intelligence officer.
And that is what they're using to stop
the bots or really to flood it with
Israeli bots and stop all the others.
Or the authentic point, which we already showed
you. And and real time, I caught it
on, like so right now, we have people
who are being shown Stripe and others that
are being showing Authentix, myself included. Authentix is
an Israeli intelligence apparatus
on the record. And he and Twitter are
still using them to scoop your biometric data
what they don't need.
It's so obvious.
Now include salami report with one of these
clips that has a great thread of all
of these financial trend transaction freedom points. There's
a lot of good ones in there.
And, of course, I'll end with this point
from this segment about what Whitney wrote, meet
TOCA, the most dangerous Israeli spy worm spyware
firm you've never heard of. The mainstream media's
myopic focus on Israel's Pegasus spyware, that's the
NSO group, and the threats it poses means
that other companies
like Toka, go and investigate it. Now, there's
your main point as you always,
really from today.
So that got exposed. NSO's been PEGAS got
exposed.
So we highlight that. We allow the media
to freak out about that while we're flooding
it with everything else we're gonna use going
forward.
That's how this works. And the point that
overlaps with the Anderson, which I think is
important,
it says, in addition to Entre Capital, Anderson
Horowitz,
that's his company, is another Tokam main investor.
So there's another example of the overlap of
his of of Anderson's Mark Anderson's investment in
Israeli spyware.
And he's talking about rolling out this AI
I mean, guys, we just need to see
how concerning this all is. The venture capital
firm cofounded by Silicon Valley
Titan, Mark Anderson, is currently advised by former
secretary of treasury, Larry Summers. Well, he's talked
about a lot about him. A close friend
of the infamous pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein.
And which by the way, let's not forget,
as even,
Acosta made clear, he was working with both
the FBI actually admitted that at one point,
but with US intelligence and Mossad.
So ask yourself how obvious this overlap is.
Early investors in Toca that are no longer
listed on the firm's website include Launch Capital,
which is deeply tied to the Pritzker family,
which she also referenced many times. One of
the wealthiest families in the US with close
ties to the Clintons and Obamas, as well
as the US pro Israel lobby. And Ray
Rothrock,
a venture capitalist who spent nearly 3 decades
in Benrock, the Rockefeller Family Venture Capital Fund.
But these are the outsiders, guys. Don't forget.
They're the outsiders. They're gonna save
you. Now, in for the interest of time,
I wanted this to be a lot shorter
today. But I'm gonna include this and we're
gonna go into this more. I'm not gonna
go over right now. But I wanted to
really kinda dive through this a lot. But
for multiple reasons, we're gonna wrap this up.
But this is a great this, Rebel Rouser
shares this. So this spread is amazing. I'm
actually, I should share this from him. And
it says,
freedom cities, as he writes digital digital gulag
by the teal and and doge, transhumanist and
technocracy, the wet dream of agenda 2030.
Here's the thread that he's highlighting.
Jenny Cohen says tech billionaire, Mark Anderson,
is reportedly getting involved with Doge. And I
have heard that reported. It's we'll have to
wait and see after January 20th to see
what actually happens. But doesn't that seem interesting?
So I guess now there's multiple people involved.
This is beginning to seem like some catch
all think tank manipulation
that they're all just using to funnel through.
I mean, who knows what this will wind
up looking like?
But the fact that
Vivek and Elon are, like, co running it
and it hasn't even been established, what it
looks like. I mean, guys, this is especially
overlapping that with this weird ethics thing and
with the end for an influence.
There is something alarm look, Mike, the way
I wrote the title today is exactly what
I think.
And it says getting involved. He's also invested
in the network state movement. That's what this
is about.
That's the that so all of these come
together with him in particular being invested with
this movement that is about basically a breakaway
conversation from the US government or any government
in creating these technocratic new area, which by
the way or rather libertarian, they frame it
as,
that are techno these are technocratic nightmares.
It's everything we just talked about, and this
is their trial balloon.
Led by this guy Balaji
Srinivas
Srinivasan,
which I'm sure I mispronounced that, which aims
to build crypto based countries,
sorta like the beginning to take over of
Honduras, Prospera with exist within
existing states
via the creation of parallel institutions
like Twitter.
You see where this is going?
Here's the clip.
Media. Okay? And so this concept of the
parallel establishment, if you take up all of
these
new institutional replacements on the right hand side,
together, that's a parallel establishment.
So really quickly for the podcast.
He's showing, like, government or rather just like
institutional things. Like, on the bottom is the
New York Times. Right? And then to the
right, he shows Twitter.
So his main premise here, in the top,
you can see, like, you know, these are
companies that are immersed with all the insider
people we're talking about. And so he shows
you these, you know, building stuff or government
buildings, and then he shows you the
new version.
Now the real question to ask, is that
just by organic
evolution?
And are we really stupid not to believe
that people that are currently in power are
going to allow you to sidestep them and
grow? No. That's what they that's that's why
up until right now,
they've stifled everything. Anything that challenges their power.
Now, suddenly, they go, now we wanna look
at it. Why?
Because this is a tran this is an
executed
what what's the term they used to use?
A, a controlled demolition.
A controlled transition
into the new control structure. That's what I'm
very certain of. My opinion though, based on
what we went over and plumbing of other
things. And so what he's highlighting is this
is like a like a transition to this
new structure
and why that's concerning
and how it's organized. There they exist alongside
the legacy in parallel. They're gaining strength of
pulling away users until they become the new
thing. Okay? So And to be clear, that
was what I was saying. I kind of
conflated that with he is not saying it's
alarming. I think he's highlighting highlighting this as,
you know, like a positive thing. That's how
we turn that seemingly impossible thing of building
a new country, break into a bunch of
individual startups, and then aggregate them together. So
really quickly. So, like, building a new country.
Right? You break it up into individual startups,
like Israeli startup nation.
And then once you establish that control, you
aggregate it into its new thing.
Does that sound sort of like a technological
coup, like a technocratic coup? Like, you're literally
transitioning, like and I'm not talking about some
it could be Israel over our current government.
I I I think it's all
Whatever it ultimately is, I think it's clear
that our government is part of, if not
leading, what this is.
So they're simply manipulating us into this new
structure, but I do think it's because we
don't have a government the way we think
we do today. I think it's obvious that
it's been bought out by corporations, lobbyists, or
just outside foreign powers.
So I think we're being transitioned in this
way. But in a way that is decentralized,
if you will. Compartmentalized.
Until it comes together as too late. That's
what we're all talking about. Again, make sure
you watch the discussion with Katherine, Jason, and
Steve, with myself. Because that's one of the
things we really discussed. It's all about what
you know, we'll wake up at one point
if we don't stop this and it's and
we're in the new surf the technocratic Panopticon.
And it really won't matter what we see
at that point. I hope that I'm wrong.
There's 2 parts to the parallel establishment. There's
the parallel societies. Okay? And these are the
physical societies. Right? These are the the first
part of today's conference is about these to
show that this is actually physical and real.
Okay? You're gonna see about a dozen of
these physical startup societies. There's cul de sac
in Arizona.
There's Prospera, as I mentioned, in South America's
cabinet.
See? And literally using Prospera as one of
the examples of what they're switching to. I'll
go over briefly again what that is. I'll
just play first. We're talking about a in
every possible way, an illegal entity. We're talking
about something that was initiated on the heels
of an illegal regime change conducted by the
US government.
That's odd. It's very obvious and easy to
prove. I'll go over in a second. Well,
but that has to show you that the
US government is working in tandem with what
this is. Texas. These are actually decentralized. They
plan to do nodes elsewhere. That's just their
first nodes. Okay? Yep. They're all kind of
More is coming elsewhere. Network cities or network
societies that are setting up little nodes around
the world.
And, so this is how we build Internet
first physical infrastructure. We've got Internet first communities
that have accrued from the Internet. These are
the kinds of places
cul de sac, for example, is like a
remote optimized city. Like, if you built a
normal city with all of this start to
sound like exactly what they floated under the
World Economic Forum, 15 minute city, smart city?
I mean, is isn't this exactly the same
thing? Ah, it seems to be. But as
long as it's floated as a tech AI
Trump Elon Musk version, we just ignore all
the overlapping problems.
At least the small minority that is the
team's sort of politics does, which is what
they present to you as everybody.
I know you all see the problems here.
It's time to stand up and point them
out. Roads for the daily commute. What would
a remote optimized city look like if it
was built for remote workers? You totally rethink
all the architecture. It's walkable, you don't have
cars everywhere, the cars are on the outside,
you're self driving. It rethinks every piece of
the infrastructure,
and these startup societies are doing things like
that. Okay? So these are the parallel societies.
And the other piece of the puzzle are
the parallel institutions. Okay? So what you can
always think of it as like a a
vertical strategy of building a new city in
place and a horizontal strategy of replacing
media and education and finance. Okay? Like, so
my point is, do you really think the
government would just allow this to take place?
They would view this as a direct threat
to their power structure, unless they're doing it
and are part of it. Now, to be
clear,
I'm very much for an organic version of
whatever we're talking about here. Like, this is
where we get into the overlap of Derek's
exit and build discussion.
My point is that just like I was
saying earlier, that's not what this is.
This is the government using that to as
a ploy. I I mean, I think look.
Whether I'm right about that,
what you're showing here is a in is
a
a centralized power, essentially, trying to use this.
Like, this is not a bunch of random
people that got together and goes, look. We're
gonna break off and make our own city
over here. That's not what we're talking about.
We're talking about high level influence funding from
outside, AI, start up, tech, billions flooded into
these things.
That's not the way that would that's not
an organic that that is a a cultivated
shift.
That's what I'm talking about.
So if, like, for example, if Derek wanted
to break off
in the United States and create a whole
new society that did not have to apply
to their laws or, you know, do you
think the government would be like, yeah. Go
ahead. No. They would arrest them for doing
that. Why then is it okay for Prospera
to do it that has different laws or
not applicable to Honduras? Ask yourself that.
I think you know why, guys. The obvious
answer is it something that they're involved with,
that they want to happen, and this is
being trialed out there in the world right
now. And now they're talking about this happening
within the United States. K. And those 2
are are complementary, the vertical and the horizontal.
So the second part of today's,
conference is about the parallel institutions. Here, you
know, these are the new New York Times
and Harbards and new Supreme Courts and Wall
Streets.
It's it's Internet first versions of medicine and
law and media and education and finance and
even science.
Right. You are the new media. That's the
whole x push. That's this is
they're step by step pulling you into this
mindset.
Even though, yes, we've all talked about this.
Anybody out there wants to be. The independent
media, the true independent media has been saying
this for a long time. Now all of
a sudden, it's x when yeah. Oh, let
me we're deciding what they
you should decide. If I'm about mob rule,
I think it's about inching you into this
mindset.
Self and decide. This example on the right
is,
for parallel education. So Replit has 20,000,000 Replit
developers is transforming computer science education worldwide. Synthesis,
AI tutoring, so you've got scale tutoring. And
the Thiel Fellowship, you know, Thiel's unicorn success
is offered for colleges. Oh, look at that.
Peter teal. What a surprise. We have the
teal fellowship.
You just can't you can't make this up,
guys. It's so clear to me who is
pulling these strings. It is literally everywhere around
the surface.
So she goes on to point out what
these are. You can look these up. She
has a link to it, the network state
discussion. This is earlier we gave descriptions of
the network state in one sentence. 1,000 words
in one essay. We also showed that a
million person version, what it looks like on
a map. See above. Because here's the definition,
that one sentence definition again. A network state,
and again, this is what Anderson is an
advocate for, is a social network with a
moral innovation,
a sense of national consciousness,
not necessarily from the nation in which it
is created. Right? A new national consciousness,
a recognized founder,
a capacity for collective action, an in person
level of civility,
an integrated cryptocurrency,
a consensual government limited by a social smart
contract,
an archipelago of crowdfunded
physical territories,
a virtual capital,
and an on chain census that proves a
large enough population income and real estate footprint
to attain a measure of diplomatic recognition.
So just because it's flavored in a different
way, is this not exactly like I mean,
if this was floated by Hillary Clinton, would
you not be worried about the exact discussion
just because you want to believe these people,
at least Trump alone is not in line
with this new direction even though it's clear
that they're all overlapped.
This is the same stuff.
It's just it's like every check every,
box checked from the World Economic Forum, the
Great Reset, all of it. And this is
just framed a little bit differently, and it's
the same exact conversation.
A parallel establishment, it says, at the heart
of the network state conference is the idea
of a parallel establishment. Now I am all
for this.
My point again is if you decided you
were gonna do this on your own with
your family or an entire community, it would
be stopped immediately. It would go Waco style
real fast.
The point is this is being allowed to
happen because this is not you or individual.
This is a centralized effort using your desire
for a decentralized future.
I'm convinced of that.
Now the problem is I get a lot
of people think we're just or we can't
take a win when you see it. Yes.
We can. You show me that win, and
then we can talk about taking it. Right
now, I see a bunch of floated ideas.
So if you're on the of the mind
that we should be buying into it before
it becomes real, then maybe you should think
about that for a second. Ask yourself how
often in the past floated government ideas, even
when they truly mean them, actually come to
pass the way we're told or don't eventually
get used by some new power to suppress
your rights.
You know, the problem is that we we
tend to want the truth so badly that
we believe that they said it. Oh, you're
right. You just don't like that he is
gonna do it. Well, when it happens, we
can talk about it.
Now he said this is the guy speaking.
Bellaghi is a former general partner of Mark
Anderson's venture capital firm, Andreessen Horowitz. So Horowitz.
So this is the guy speaking. Surprise, surprise,
is directly connected with Mark Anderson. Now it
says in 2022,
just the book they wrote about the same
thing, network state, digital communities crowdfund resources to
build autonomous cities and states.
It's just like, in what world is that
happening outside of some controlled government structure,
even though it should be able to happen?
In April 2024, the article for the New
Republic, Gil Duran warned against dism dismissing
the network state as an unpopular fringe theory.
Clearly, we can see that's not the case
today. His article drew from a September 23
23 podcast interview in which he called for
tech friendly people to seize political power and
take control of cities.
He said that his plan would include democrats
from areas the techies control.
He suggested bribing the police
to prevent them from enforcing laws,
disadvantageous
to technological companies
technology companies. Durant argued that the ideas reveal
an appetite for autocracy. Exactly. Now just because
in this case, we're framing it as the
democrat side, it's not about left and right.
It's whatever flavor they can use to get
you to support what's going on. That's what
I think.
And it goes over what Anderson's connected to,
and he's talking about joining Doge, and it's
all very concerning. Then it goes, why do
Trump, Thiel, and Anderson want to build new
cities? They ask.
The network state movement calls for the creation
of private
that did that last time. Hold on.
Twitter is always so fantastic.
Is that ridiculous?
There it is. Oh, it was the right
one. Okay. So it says,
the network state, freedom cities see damn it.
The network state movement calls for the creation
of private cities ruled by non democrat tech
governments.
So why would you I mean, on the
surface, they're talking about technocratic
rulership. Why would you want that?
And then it says freedom cities, that's the
Trump idea or rather the Trump adjacent idea,
which is clearly endorsed by the whole Republican
side of this, seems like a slight Republican
rebranding off the concept. The adaption
of the idea suggest that Trump's team, which
announced the plan last year,
has been searching for ways to align with
weird tech for quite some time.
Trump's weird freedom cities in the network state
cult. Now you don't have to frame it
the same way, but this is the point
about the overlap and what is coming,
regardless of the way that they see it.
Now my point is you got people like
this that are seen as democrats, which then
they just go, this is weird and gross,
and you get people that immediately go, well,
that's not true then because they already have
a d by their name. Who cares about
what people are in play? You should look
at the information and recognize how concerning this
is to everything that we think we're fighting
for.
She says to recap
see if that happens?
Is it only me? Probably.
So stupid. The network state call calls for
the creation of new tech controlled sovereign cities
that would essentially act as miniature countries. These
independent territories can be created in one of
2 ways. Watch.
It's so dumb. Same spot every time.
For the podcast, just dumb Twitter stuff.
Now I think in general, you can read
through the most of this. I'm already going
longer than I thought I was gonna do
right there. The point is that they're simply
saying that you can either do this through
something called voice, which entails the political system
to take over existing city governments through elections.
So one thing to think about, which already
may be happening from an outside perspective,
but then it says the other is called
exit, which this exit method involves finding a
bare piece of land that can be built
up into a new tech city.
Okay.
Now I I thought I had, yeah. It's
right there.
Where in the world do we have a
bare piece of land? Like, this is not
some Israel fantasy where you pretend it's a
land without a people. No. There there was
played people there. Now what's weird is that
Trump makes a a reference with that.
And when he puts forward the idea of
the freedom cities.
Past generations of Americans
pursued big dreams and daring projects
that once seemed absolutely impossible. Trying to tap
into this idea of the, you know, manifest
destiny. Right? We're gonna strike out well, again,
that's not what they're doing now.
But what he relates it to, I think,
is telling. They pushed across an unsettled continent
and built new cities in the wild frontier.
Oh, you mean unsettled by native Americans then.
Right?
Or just not settled in the way that
you want it to look.
Big surprise this guy supports the ongoing genocide
of Palestine because what you just discussed is
ridiculous.
No. There was a thriving multinational,
whatever you would call it, multi tribal
society all across the United States. That the
US or rather specific this time, the whatever
you would call it, the the budding, eventually
becoming US government or structure.
Or, I mean, even then, that's not even
accurate. Just average people
came in and wiped out people. You know,
India took territory, stole, raped, pillage, murdered. Then
there was the establishment of a structure
that became the US government. And from that
point forward, continued to ethnically cleanse native Americans
down to very small locations, one after another,
all the way to this point.
But we're gonna pretend like settled and unsettled
nation. Really?
That's the point, though. The same thing. Exit
the exit and build dynamic is not about
seizing property from somebody else. That's what Prospera's
doing, by the way.
It is about trying to recreate your own
community in a place where you already exist.
They're trying to capitalize on all these ideas
to drive you into this new technocratic structure.
They transformed American life with the interstate highway
system,
magnificent it was,
and they launched a vast network of satellites
into orbit
all around the earth.
But today, our country has lost its boldness.
Under my leadership, we will get it back
in a very big way. If you look
at just 3 years ago, what we were
doing was unthinkable.
How good it was, how great it was
for
Right. Because
the operation warp speed dynamic was fantastic. Right?
Wasn't like anything else bad happened during that
time frame. Right? It was an entire year
of the ongoing problem. But it was amazing
what was going on.
Yeah. People are delusional.
Partisans are delusional by design. Not one side
or the other. That you can ignore the
obvious illegality of all of these people is
mind blowing to me.
Our country.
Our objective will be a
quantum leap in the American standard of living.
That's what will happen.
Here are just a few of the ways
we can do it. Almost 1 third of
the land mass of the United States is
owned by the federal government,
which is illegal and unconstitutional,
which by the way, here we go again.
Pointing to something that they are responsible for,
which by the way was happening during his
last administration,
which and by by the way, was added
to during his last administration. That's important.
Then you're now gonna say bad thing. Let's
get rid of that bad thing, but replace
it with technocratic nightmares.
The whole show today, guys. Everything I'm seeing
is about them using these problems to step
on to build the new problem.
It's just a very, very small portion of
that land. Just a fraction.
One half of Okay. Well, how about we
take it all? How about you're not allowed
to own government? The government the my the
my general opinion, the federal government itself is
an unconstitutional
idea,
but the idea of the bro like, the
Bureau of Land Management. They are not supposed
to be owning territory.
1 by 1, slope step by step, we
have continued to watch this thing become what
it is today.
They're you and and this is always they're
so we're gonna use that same power that's
unjust to
not give it back,
not make it right,
but take that stolen land and make it
something better.
So you're just gonna keep perpetuating the problem.
Same with the Bitcoin. So you're gonna take
stolen Bitcoin and use it for your purposes?
So you're the same problem then. Give it
back to people if you wanna make it
right. Of 1%,
would you believe that
we should hold a contest to charter up
to 10 new cities and award them to
the best proposals
for development. Here we go. And, guys, this
is lined up.
And that and sent now since then, we've
seen all this start rising up. And we've
already seen the examples as as I pointed
out before, Prospera, and a few other examples
that are trial balloons. I'm very worried about
where this begins to go. Words will actually
build new cities in our country again.
These freedom cities will reopen the frontier,
reignite American imagination.
Okay. So hypothetically, you wanna rush out there
with your family and build a new city.
Are they gonna let you do that? I
know you'd love to pretend that's what he
means. It's very clearly not the case. They're
gonna bid and have contracts. You're gonna have
big entities building these things. So you're gonna
have people like, Anderson and Musk and whoever
else. That's what we're talking about. If this
was really a new frontier, you'd be able
to go out and stay stake a claim
and do it yourself.
It's not what's happening. It's an illusion. And
give 100 of thousands of young people and
other people,
all hardworking families,
a new shot at homeownership
and, in fact, the American dream. You know
how many homes out there right now are
currently unoccupied? You know how much territory there
is I mean, this is just a ploy
making you think about these lofty ideas.
As always,
I hope that's the reality. I hope that
what they're doing is about some unfettered reality,
freedom and liberty.
I just guys, I think it's transparently
obvious that's not what this is.
So she mentions Prospera
on the island of Roatan in Honduras is
an example of this. A tech runs special
economic zone, right out of the
stay sustainable
development goals, by the way, where current certain
rules don't apply. Prospera has become a mecca
for, guess what, unregulated
gene therapy experiments.
On top of god knows what else, seeing
as how they don't have to apply to
any law, not not even Honduras law. They
do what they want.
That's what and and it's just mind blowing
what we're talking about here. Now, again, in
a situation where you had your own community,
that's your prerogative. But we're talking about a
government funded,
technocratic influenced,
I I mean, nightmares were the only word
that comes but a a control structure who
is who is encroaching on other land in
Honduras, who is continuing to violate the laws
of the land there despite we're gonna I'll
I'll go through it in a second. The
point is that that's crazy. That we're talking
about a powerful entity that is clearly has
influence or influence from Israel and the United
States.
This is what we're talking about. You really
think they just randomly decided to do gene
therapy experiments because they thought that'd be fun?
That's what we're talking about is something bigger
than what we're being told.
Now it says, and then there's our local
version, California forever.
This proposed city in Solano County was supposed
to go to voters for approval on November's
ballot, but it has been delayed due to
massive community opposition.
Think about that. So it's funny. It says
California forever denies being a state, nation,
network state project.
But Anderson,
Mark Anderson
is one of its investors.
So let me get this straight. California is
the big bad boogeyman of the Democrats. Right?
That's all the big pro and I agree
that the California is a hellhole in my
opinion, a lot of political ways.
But
Anderson, who's supposed to be kind of on
the side of the Thiel, Musk, Trump direction
with where it goes, the Freedom City, He's
supporting the California freedom city. Isn't that interesting?
How does that make sense? Well, it only
makes sense when you realize it's not about
your dem your left versus right paradigm. It's
about using that to drive you into this
in the current context.
And so this is important because Anderson and
Balaji, when speaking above, and Peter Thiel are
working closely together to make network state a
reality.
By the way, quick note. Am I the
only one that's no longer oh, there you
go. Well, now it's highlighting. That's strange.
Anyway, never mind.
I don't even wanna mention it because now
it's always. But
it goes on to say that so all
of them are involved.
Peter Thiel,
Balaji speaking, Anderson,
with what we're talking about. Rolling out this
technocratic nation state, break off cities that have
nothing to do with anything other than a
technocratic ruling structure. And it says,
these
Oh, for f sake.
I'm so tired of this platform. Like, these
3 even have an entire company dedicated to
building such cities around the world. They have
an entire company dedicated to building nation a
network state
break off city dynamic.
Anderson is reportedly getting involved in Doge, it
says. So now here you have the connection.
So now he's getting involved with what's supposed
to be government efficiency, which will use AR
artificial intelligence. So what do you think they
start proposing these new cities like Trump did?
I mean, guys, it's a foregone conclusion. Trump
already floated this freedom city idea. You have
him floating this as an alternative idea. They're
gonna I mean, we have Trump's weird kind
of independent entity right now that's not even
technically involved, overlap, or taking government funding.
How do we not freak out about what
this shows us right now? Whether it's technocracy,
whether it's Zionism, something is going on.
And Balaji even wrote a book, the guy
speaking above, about the network state, how to
build a country.
As you can see, Mark Anderson blurbed about
it, saying this is exactly the direction we
should be taking. As far as he could
tell, he has done most of the heavy
lifting when it comes to reporting on this
network statement, this person they linked to here.
And then they show you Trump's, this tweet
here saying, let's talk about Trump's freedom cities.
And then here's the Trump tweet about it.
President Trump will work to open up American
Frontier. That's what I just heard.
And then ends with the point about Prospera,
and we'll talk about that next.
Demanding $11,000,000,000.
I think the GDP is like 30 something
1,000,000,000.
So effectively trying to bankrupt the country, which
by the way doesn't remove the government, but
effectively gives all the assets and control to
a technocratic structure.
So once that happens, who's actually in charge?
That's the point.
So this is another thread about the freedom
cities dynamic. I'm gonna let you read that
for yourself. But the first two actually just
says Trump's freedom cities are a nod to
the dystopian network state idea
popular in tech circles. The cultish movement seeks
to recreate tech controlled sovereign cities that would
essentially act as miniature corporate countries.
Exactly the concern. Fans of the network state
idea imagine creating privately owned zones where they
can escape taxes, laws, and democracy.
They plan to form their own cult cities
and
based on different interests and themes. But instead,
being citizens, they beat customers.
Doesn't that begin to sound like you'll own
nothing and be happy?
Are all these different overlaps the same kind
of conversation?
There are 2 ways, that they already discussed
it. So to wrap up in general, here's
David Icke had to say about Trump saying
freedom cities. He says, oh, yes. His freedom
cities are, guess what, AI controlled enslavement cities
where I have pointed out in my books,
as he has, and his different language describe
the same cult goal. As usual, he's the
pied piper fraud and always has been.
Well, in this conversation, we talked about this
on September 7, 2024.
Again, I'm gonna point out,
demonstrating our value.
How often we seem to be ahead of
these conversations. And it's just because we're reading
what's going on, not being bound by a
partisan direction.
But the technocratic regime change, I titled it,
under the guise of freedom tech technocrats are
slowly taking control.
Look at that. It's exactly what we're talking
about.
Also, Brock put out this great clip from
the show
simply titled Honduras Prospera Inc, a technocrat funded
coup.
Now
the general gist of this, guys, is that
in 2009,
the US government, and this is easy to
look up, committed a coup in Honduras.
Put people in positions of power that they
wanted,
and then seemingly in unison, this entity, Peter
Thiel's funded entity, Prospera,
creates a autonomous zone.
Gets a or I jumped to first, they
try to get a law passed for these
strategic zones.
The court wouldn't do it
because it's completely a violation of their sovereignty.
Then, guess what? Because they put people in
power that they could control, they removed half
the court and put people in position that
would go with their with their vote. And
then what a what a magic happened, and
they voted in favor of what they wanted.
That's not democracy, guys. That is a manipulation.
That is a government overthrow.
And that's how this started. So then they
got the vote they wanted. Then they go,
okay. Now we got democracy even though they
forced it in. Then they create this location.
From that point forward, they have continued to
manipulate this discussion.
Right? They have even right I guess a
place called Crop Crawfish Rock right now is
complaining that they're already being told they're gonna
be absorbed into this. Yeah. A libertarian city
would not be absorbing parts of other territories
without their authority or without their desire.
So then it comes to the point of
today, there's a lot in between this,
where we have them now, basically,
other people were voted in. I think the
US government is spread so thin right now
that they aren't able to keep influence on
all these places.
And another group was voted in, whatever you
think about them, and then they changed the
law.
So if we're gonna pretend like it's about
democracy, well, the law currently states this isn't
allowed.
Guess what they're doing? They're saying we don't
care. In fact, it looks like they're just
pretending it's not happening.
Now what they're doing is suing the state
of Honduras, the country of Honduras,
for violation of a contract that was created
under an illegal coup and after judges were
removed. All this is easy to prove. So
now they're trying to create this idea that
they can sue them, which, by the way,
even the New York Times argues they probably
will win.
So, again, that's the point. They win an
$11,000,000,000
lawsuit against the GDP of 30 something 1,000,000,000.
They lose. That that's the end of that
government. They don't cease to exist, but the
assets will be out of the control of
this group.
So then what happens going forward?
Who's in control? Well, the government's technically there,
but they have all the power.
Think about that with what we're currently dealing
with. Whether it's the freedom cities or the
entire country right now.
That's where this seems to be going in
my mind.
Now the craziest part is they're continuing, and
they're claiming they're gonna build new ones. Even
though Honduras is like, that's illegal right now.
And it is, by definition, because the law
is not there. It is not the current
law. I am of the mind that there
and even the leader of Honduras
came out a couple months ago and said
explicitly, the US government is currently trying to
regime change us again.
So I'm of the mind to prosper Prospera,
which is basically just a government tangential entity,
Rather specifically teal and all their companies. Like,
it's it's it's interconnected.
That is the technocracy today. I think they
are of the mind the US government or
they through the US government are going to
regime change them again. So they're just waiting.
Either way, right now, it's an illegal entity.
And they're they're
a trial balloon for all of this. Now,
again, they're using Bitcoin
as currency. They're using Starlink, buy from Elon
Musk. I mean, everything about this is the
terrifying and this is not about some organic
city that rose up because they want freedom,
guys. This is about a a an occupation
of a foreign occupied area.
This is what we're dealing with. I hope
you will take time to listen to this
and understand what we're dealing with in general.
Max Blumenthal,
pointing out, what Kelly said here, said according
to reports, Trump is eyeing Peter Thiel or
Peter Thiel's Peter Thiel's pal, Trey Stevens,
a venture capitalist tech bro who invests and
profits from the defense industry for the 2nd
highest position in the Pentagon.
Now, of course, we have to wait for
January 20th and before or after even for
the senate confirmations to see what happens.
But as Max says, Peter Thiel, a transhumanist
architect of the genocidal AI targeting system, being
tested on Palestinians, which is easy to prove,
in the Gaza death camp seems to have
bought a top Trump Pentagon post for PayPal
mafia.
Ending on the reality that they're currently testing
this AI technology
in Gaza and elsewhere.
As 972 magazine quoted IDF members as saying,
a, quote, a mass assassination factory inside Israel's
calculated bombing of Gaza, where they tell you
that they're bombing buildings just to bomb buildings,
where they're killing people just to scare them.
This is on the record.
6 current and former IDF members are on
the record in this article. And then they
followed it up with another one called Lavender.
1 is 1 is about the the building
structures. 1's about individual people. Both are targeting
these things through algorithmic AI
target, like, you know, AI algorithms.
And and the point being that they're already
justifying this as sort of like, woah. They're
deciding. They're being driven to not even check
what they're doing. They're just going along as
fast as they can. They're being timed.
Lavender, the AI machine directing Israel's bombing spree
in Gaza. So we can't see by now
that this is rolling out around the world,
that the very people who are the most
influential in Trump's cabinet are the ones rolling
out what we're seeing. And whether it's the
technocrat side, whether it's the Zionist side, whether
we realize that they're 1 and the same.
I think it's all right there in front
of you.
Now I'm right there with you about hoping
that this is not the case, that they
hoping and that they follow through with any
of their promises.
But until they do, until it comes to
pass,
why is it inappropriate to point out these
problems, to point out the concerns?
That should be a a very clear red
flag to people that are honest.
When something positive happens, if any of these
things fail to come to pass, I will
be happy to point that out. I'll be
standing up and praising any good thing that
happens, whether Trump or Kamala or anybody else.
But I think you can recognize the problem
here.
And as well as the earlier point,
isn't the argument that Trump got tricked with
his picks before and, you know,
why can't that happen again? I mean, obviously,
you know that it can. So whatever you
think is the reality of what his intentions
are, which I don't know why we think
we know that,
the facts are on the table. It's all
being built right in front of you. And
I just think it's time for us to
push back in an in an objective nonpartisan
way to anything that we think goes against
what we want. And Republicans
more than anybody, were calling out all of
this stuff, all of these directions. Every single
thing they're pointing to in some red flavored
way, right, so they're putting an r next
to it, and suddenly, it's all good. It's
what we wanted because the right people are
doing it. I just I've never seen more
obvious displays of using the problem that we've
all been pointing at to justify the next
problem
in hopes that they prevent that they provide
the solution.
So I hope we can see this. I
hope we can share this and discuss this
larger. I mean, more than the Israeli entity
right now, this technocratic part, which again, I
really do think is one and the same,
is so on the surface of this. And
I with the Trump transition part of this
and what that means, that gap, that opening,
I get I'm very concerned about what's happening
right now and what might be happening in
this opening gap, let alone if it just
doesn't happen. If that doesn't happen and they
nobody, like, pressures that signing of those pledges
to divulge the foreign funding,
that'll speak for itself.
But my worry is that even if it
does, like, what is happening right now? And
what that would mean for the next 4
years, if not the future in general? So
thank you for tuning in. My plan is
to do my interview with Vanessa tomorrow and
get that out tomorrow. So we'll be getting
into some more foreign policy in general. But
thank you for tuning in, guys. I think
what we're discussing today is very important to
the long term conversation. So please do your
best to get this out and discuss it,
clip it, have conversations, tag me, I'll share
it myself. Thank you for being here. I
couldn't do this without all of you. I
love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.