Let me
let me preface these remarks with I never,
never, ever believe
Israeli figures.
I've been in the government too long to
know that the Israelis are patent liars.
In their intelligence community, in their propaganda community,
certainly,
and in their leadership. They are inveterate
liars.
Let me say that again. They are liars.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Thursday, November 14, 2024. Thank you for joining
me. Welcome back. We only I don't know
what
12 hours ago, we were right back here.
Now today, we are gonna be following up
on what happened last night. Now the main
focus yet again is on the Zionist cabinet
picks of Donald Trump. And as I highlighted
or the title shows today, conservatives beginning to
acknowledge that, which I think is a really
important and powerful shift. And, of course, if
you don't know my sort of differentiation,
I see it, and this is certainly my
opinion, but I think it's pretty clear today
that we see
republicans and democrats, which is to the terms
I like to differentiate that are in the
team sport politics dynamic of everything that's happening.
Meaning, it's ultimately about the team and winning,
and the facts, if at all, are really
a tangential point. Conservatives and liberals, in my
opinion, and I I I've seen the same
thing through COVID 19, through what's going on
with Israel,
are largely becoming aware, I think, of some
of the different things that are happening. The
lies, the the the Israel first focus of
the current cabinet. Or, you know, as it
pertains
to democrats, let's say, during COVID 19, becoming
aware of the dangers of vaccine. Like, these
things have been broadening out, and it's not
very partisan as much as they want you
to think it is. So today, what I'm
recognizing,
yesterday as well, that conservatives specifically are are
very publicly starting to call these things out.
Pretty prominent accounts actually on Twitter and elsewhere
beginning to say, wait a minute. This is
not what we were promised.
That's integrity.
Right? That's standing by your principles even though
you know you're gonna get attacked by the
mob, which that kind of mob exists on
both sides of the partisan dynamic to keep
you guys in line. But I'm glad you're
starting to push back. So today, what we're
gonna follow-up on is what happened yesterday. We
were in the middle of this show and
I had gone over, which I'm gonna briefly
go over as best I can briefly to
start. I want because I wanna make sure
we get all this nailed down in the
same show, the things that I was talking
about yesterday in the beginning, the earlier picks
around Elon and and, Vivek,
and some of the other points that I'm
actually pushing off entirely, but that I wanna
make sure we cover again and get back
to where we got cut off yesterday, which
was right around Marco Rubio, which it does
appear today that has been, at least again,
confirmed in the sense that Trump has said
it publicly and mar Rubio is talking about
it publicly.
That wasn't the case yesterday. Now and on
top of that, let's not forget that any
of these things can change the next couple
of months. Any of them. Whether Trump acknowledges
it, whether he accepts it, or whoever they're
talking about. That could change because the senate
may not confirm them. It could change by
the the fact that Donald Trump changes his
mind. It could change the fact that they
don't want the position anymore, or it could
turn out that we're all being lied to
for some
left first right dynamic. Either way, no matter
what we're seeing now until it actually happens,
we have to keep it up in the
air. That's just being objective about it. And
what I think is interesting is most of
the conversation yesterday, people on Twitter, people pushing
back on the the Rubio aspect as if
that was just democrat lies. Well, here we
are where it's been publicly discussed. Now those
same people who were saying that I'm already
seeing online trying to convince you why Rubio
is a good choice. We need to see
how obviously dishonest that is. Whatever site you're
on, whatever objective place you're in, and see
that those people are not in it to
tell you the truth. So what I wanna
start with is to show you what happened
yesterday briefly because I find it to be
pretty interesting. It wasn't just your typical censorship.
And I and I'm still trying to decipher
exactly what happened. And as always, I'm never
gonna come at this and tell you I
know for sure that this was sent it
it is suspected censorship in my mind. But
I've I'm gonna show you what I see
and I you're gonna see why I think
it's pretty obvious that some string was pulled
yesterday.
But what's it's just so interesting, the timing
of it all. That when it took place,
how it took place, and we've made a
few different changes today in order to maybe
see if we can't bolster against that, but
it still very well might happen today. Now
on that very note, let's make sure you
guys can hear me and we're on all
the platforms. It does appear that everything is
up and running. So we're gonna get right
into this today. The the main point again
is to go over the cabinet picks, the
Zionist influence, and the acknowledgment of the Israel
first agenda,
which the reason I chose the picture I
did today is because I think we need
to recognize
it's not a partisan concept.
Both parties are equally
aggressively influenced, if not controlled, by a foreign
entity, and I think this needs to be
acknowledged publicly. I mean, we have them. But,
I mean, everybody needs to put aside all
the nonsense and just accept the obvious nature
of what we're staring at. As always, you
cannot solve a problem unless you first acknowledge
it exists.
There's people out there still trying to deny
the fact that this is even happening while
even main conservatives out there are calling this
out.
So I wanted to start with what happened.
So I put this out yesterday on Twitter
just because I wanted you guys to know
what happened because it just abruptly shut down
right in the middle of the stream, like,
almost right halfway through, right as we're getting
to Marco Rubio. The whole thing from Restream's
side just shut down. Now what's very interesting,
and I'll do this briefly because there's so
many points we can get into,
as you know, I use Restream, I use
StreamYard. I there I I there's a few
different dynamics I use. Now Restream is one
of the ones that multi streams. But I
have Rockfin on something else. All of these
things come from one stream and you're looking
at it. K? So the data that's coming
through, the data stream,
is coming from this computer and it's the
only stream that's out there. So we can
see that Rockfin didn't stop. And I confirmed
that during the show. There was not it
didn't skip a beat.
So what that shows you is that there
was no interruption in the data stream. So
I went back and forth for over an
hour after the show yesterday with Restream
that they responded on the first a bot,
then I finally got it personal. At least
it seemed that way, and now they've escalated
it to somebody else because they also acknowledged
that there's something weird here.
So either way, the point is that they
were first saying, well, the in your encoder
stopped sending information, so that's why it cut
down. I said, that's not true. I can
prove that. I have all the information here,
and I can prove that the other things
not on Restream never stopped. So this could
simply just be Restream with having a glitch.
Right? Just put but that's a pretty big
glitch for a company that's entire business is
maintaining
as seamless as possible streaming to multiple platforms.
Not that you can have a little blip
and suddenly all of them shut down. Like,
I mean, even with Restream, to be honest,
we've talked about this, or any of the
platforms.
Almost all of them have a correction mechanism
where if there's a blip because we all
know that the Internet can blip out or
you can lose connection for a few seconds,
that that's not that it doesn't cut the
stream. It just basically blacks out for a
second or pauses and buffers and then it
reconnects.
So I'm finding it really hard to believe
that they can tell me that it was
a a momentary blip and then shut down,
I think, 7 or 7 different streams coming
through Restream.
But, again, to leave it there, it could
just be something that was problematic on their
side. But now that we went through back
and forth with them and she was able
to recognize that I can prove that it
didn't stop elsewhere and was all the same
data stream, she wasn't able to figure out
what happened. And so they've escalated it. Now
I have to wait to hear back via
email. But I put this out so you
guys would know. Tonight's episode was abruptly censored
in real time at platform level just as
I was getting into the ziest Zionist cabinet
picks. I did tag them saying, can you
tell me why I was selective? I guess
I was a little frustrated when I wrote
that. I should have put at least suspected
to be as objective as possible centered through
your platform tonight. Now they did respond just
recently this morning. And it says, hey there.
We're sorry to hear your stream ended unexpectedly.
Please know that Restream does not moderate your
content.
And I'd like I hope so. Because I
mean, let's be clear.
It's any of these are possible. We'll get
into this today with the earlier discussions from
Israel and I mean, even with the Amsterdam
story which I'm gonna put off in general,
the full foreign policy talks until tomorrow or
the next day. It's it's incredible to see
how these stories go where you can have
the evidence that is locked. It's just
unquestionable
across the board. Now, of course, there could
be more that might change that perception, but
that evidence we can see is very clear.
And then people come out and lie about
it. And then over the process of a
few days, you start to see a few
things happen. Also, suddenly editors of larger papers
start putting out different stories or different police
people that are above the ones who are
speaking start standing over them and going, no.
No. No. Here's what happened.
And weirdly, the evidence doesn't change. All that
changes is people in more positions of power
putting out a new narrative.
And what I think that is, and you
can decide for yourself, is the Zionist influence
over these con these entities, which, by the
way, the world is beginning to see very
clearly. So, as usual, you get the facts,
the information, you get the objective coverage, you
get the real time video everywhere, and then
they lie about it. And then later, you
get the forceful reactive propaganda to try to
tell you that you're wrong because these people
are now saying so. That happens. And we've
seen the atrocity propaganda. We've seen. Now I
don't wanna get into that all in general
today because this is the focus even though
Israel is the huge overlap here. My point
is in all of that, we wouldn't be
surprising that somebody could lean on any of
these platforms to get something like this to
happen. But I wanna make sure we hold
out. I don't want anybody screaming at Restream.
We don't really know what happened. And I
said, we can see a technical ticket has
already been opened. So right there, they're making
sure you guys can see that they have
escalated this. If this was some simple thing,
they could say, nope. You just lost connection.
They would've they wouldn't be at this level.
So a ticket has been escalated and they
are continuing to investigate. And it says, our
engineers are investigating further. Once there's an update,
we'll reach out. So we'll leave it there
for now.
But that's what happened yesterday, and it was
pretty wild to me because clearly, this this
was the show from yesterday, which honestly, I'm
I'm I'm really not even gonna add anything
or follow-up because truly oh, it's weird. Odyssey's
been acting funny on my platform lately, but
that ultimately almost everything we're gonna talk about
today will will be redundant. So I'm just
we pretty much just skip that yesterday,
and today will be the main focus of
the show. But that was again the point,
the cabinet picks and the obvious nature of
it. Now, one last weird anomaly that I
thought stood out, I went right to Rumble
and I posted
the tweet.
I posted the tweet that showed that I
was censored so you guys on there would
know what happened.
I didn't delete that.
Without there's no I've 100% did not delete
that. I posted it last night, and I
and came back this morning and it says
deleted. Which makes me very uncomfortable.
Maybe somebody has access to my Rumble account
or somebody at Rumble was making it. I
don't know. And then even more strange, when
I try to post it again,
this is what I actually originally post posted.
I write I I just put censored
with a colon.
Oh, let me grab I grabbed this real
quick. And then I added the tweet that
I put in there.
I think this is interesting to show you
live.
So this was the tweet, and I just
added it for you guys to see because
I want you guys to recognize what happened.
And 1, it continues to it pops up,
and I hit pin, and it says, cannot
pin deleted comments.
So there's clearly some kind of a weird
overlapping thing going on here because, obviously, I
just posted that. It's not deleted. This is
the one that was deleted that I didn't
actually delete. That is still pinned, by the
way, that won't let me unpin it. And
even if I hit restore, it doesn't happen.
Okay. So, obviously, this just could be some
random weirdly coincidental glitch alongside this. You see,
this is something really weird. This is the
kind of stuff that I don't always get
into that happens to me every day all
the time on most of the things I'm
using. Welcome to Technocracy.
At least, that's how I read into this.
But I do find that very strange. Right?
Why would it's and and, of course, you
refresh it. And I believe one of the
ones are down below, but it doesn't show
up. Your comment says t Lab, that's being
your platform, is supposed to be all the
way at the top.
One of the ones from before is all
the way down at the bottom, and I
still can't pin it. Now this is a
small thing, but it makes me very uncomfortable
to think that because
of the clear conservative Trump supporting side to
this that this is being I don't know.
I don't wanna jump to conclusions, but we
can all acknowledge that's pretty damn weird. I
don't like my comments being deleted that I
didn't delete and not allowing me to pin
on my platform the comment that I wanted
there in the first place that was originally
pinned.
Pretty damn strange.
Again, I did not jump to conclusions,
but I think we can all see that
there's something weird there.
Now before we get into the rest of
it, just a thought shared something I wanna
say share with you.
And this is important. We kinda briefly yesterday
went over a point about trying not to
fall to the lower level. Right? And and
falling into the trap of the vitriol on
these platforms, which even this morning, I went
went out with somebody else. But because because
they're lashing out at me. But even then,
my point is that
I'm trying to rise above that and not
fall into that because it's it helps nobody.
Helps no one.
So I'm trying like we all should to
kind of be better with every day and
stop falling into the nonsense that drives you.
It just racks, and it is all about
trying to bring you down to a lower
energy level. And she says, I keep seeing
posts saying we're so effed.
And I get that's kind of the same
conversation. And she goes, in regard to what's
coming down the pipeline. Now look, I agree.
It's clearly problematic.
And even more so that you got conservatives
that are now finally seeing this going, woah.
Okay. We're in some we're screwed. Now I
don't think we're screwed or we're effed. I
I think we're in a very bad path
right now, and I think that is because
we're becoming so aware of what's happening. And
she says, why?
Why are why are we feeling so effed?
There are more far more people aware in
the last 5 years.
Why do we act like we have no
ability to fight back at all? And I
think this is part of that agenda. I'm
with her a 100%. Yeah. This is a
pretty dark time because of where they're forcing
us to go, but realize that more people
see it than ever. So if we're really
just discussing how much we can see the
problem, which is the next the next step
would be how we deal with that problem,
then we're further ahead than I think I've
ever seen. Just because they're driving the negative
agenda on the heels of that, doesn't mean
that we're still not in a place to
possibly have more chains than we've ever seen
before. That's what dying power structures do, they
lash out. So I just think it's important
to think about that. I'm with her. I
think that we're in a time right now
where we have a lot of reason to
be hopeful about where we go. And the
machine is desperately set on making you feel
the opposite. Just like during COVID 19, the
one thing they wanted more than ever was
to make you think you were alone. That
nobody agreed with you, that you were a
crazy conspiracy theorist and everyone thought you were
nuts when when turned when turned out, despite
how most people were afraid to say it
out loud in front of their neighbors because
they were were also thinking they were alone
and most of you probably had a similar
thought, that at the end of the day,
it turned out we all kinda sensed it.
Most people at some level now are willing
to go, yeah. I I got I wasn't
sure about that.
Well, if we had known that in the
moment, we could've pushed back even more. But
people were convinced because of the corporate media
that they were
the ones that's that blown crazy in the
corner.
Let's stand up together, guys. Left, right, conservative,
liberal, republican, democrat. Let's stand up for what
we actually want to see. And I'm not
talking about the TeamSport politics out there because
they don't care at the end of the
day. But, hey, if you wanna change your
mind, if you wanna work for what's objectively
you know, what's good for people and not
just for winning, then absolutely. I don't care
what you say you fight for or what
you call yourself rather. But my point is
we can see common ground.
That's more powerful than anything.
Now, again, I'm gonna start with a couple
of follow ups on this, but this was
one thing I pointed out yesterday which still
seems to be the same thing. Now, it's
even more relevant because Rubio has been officially,
which I think is right
here.
It's oh, we'll get to in a second.
It's a little bit further down. But the
point is that Rubio has now been, you
know, Reuters and and Donald Trump himself has
publicly said he is the choice. Now whether
that happens or not is up in the
air still. But it's different because a lot
of people on the Republican side were shouting
you down for even saying that was possible.
And, by the way, sharing all the clips
of Rubio, which we'll get to in a
minute, calling Donald Trump a con artist, and
then laughing at you because you're falling for
republic democrat media when here we are. Right?
And those same people, as I'm seeing already,
are beginning to tell you why he was
a good choice in the first place. 30
seconds ago, they were laughing at you for
thinking it was real. It's just especially conservatives
need to see those people and recognize they're
the ones playing you all.
And, I mean, everybody, not just left and
right. They are the ones that Democrats point
to as well, and they that it's it's
a cascading illusion.
But here, looking up Marco Rubio
for this tweet or excuse me, Donald Trump,
for a tweet where he says Rubio was
a totally was totally owned by the lobbyists
and special interests, 2015.
Well, he that's the same dynamic today. So
either Donald Trump doesn't care about that anymore
or he never did. And it says a
lightweight senator with the worst voting records in
in the senate. Lazy.
Okay. Well, I was simply trying to find
that. The only way I actually did was
searching it for it on Google. It happened
to find somebody commenting on it. But I
looked on Twitter, and I looked for the
word Rubio or by the way, on the
on the last show, I'll do it quick
today, I searched for totally, I searched for
owned, And some things did pop up. But
you know what never did? This tweet from
Donald Trump. Even though it's clearly there, it's
clearly on Twitter. And so right logically speaking,
if this was actually not suppressing content, it
would pop up.
Latest,
top, neither one.
Doesn't matter.
I find that to be actually pretty important.
And I'm My point is if you look
at the yesterday's show, it's the same thing
with Elon Musk's account. And why do you
think this would be suppressed right now?
I mean, this is not unique. You can
find all sorts of things. Suddenly, certain things
are being pulled back. This is clearly not
free speech. I shouldn't have to point that
out. To me, that's super important.
Now let's start talk well, first, I I
went over yesterday some other points to kind
of keep it keep in your mind if
you weren't aware of what Israel was currently
doing while we're highlighting why it's so it's
a problem. These people are blindly pro Israel
at at the expense of American interest. Well,
just one of those points. And I hope
I shouldn't have to inform you about the
obvious nature of what Israel is doing right
now.
This is right now. This is today. What
you're looking at here, ladies and gentlemen, is
the Beirut airport
and civilian
housing around it. This is the this is
it's incredible to think that this can happen
in broad daylight
where we are today. And, by the way,
I'm gonna get into tomorrow, which it kills
me to push off for another day in
a row, is that Israel's bombing in Syria
again. And as Vanessa Bailey has been pointing
out and plenty of other examples, it's all
it's part of a larger agenda. And the
US is even pointing at it and saying,
now we have to fight back because they're
because Syrian rebels are attacking our interests. No.
Israel is bombing them and they're responding, and
you're using that as a justification to continue
your your
illegal operations around the world. That Trump was
doing the same, and he will continue it,
guys. But this is in Lebanon.
Before your eyes before the eyes of the
world, Sarah Abdallah points out, Israel is dropping
bombs near the Beirut airport as planes full
of civilians prepare to take off. Imagine the
global uproar if such a scene took place
in Ukraine.
But since it's happening in Lebanon, not one
bat's an eye. Or how about it was
in Tel Aviv? Can you even imagine?
Right next to the
right next to the,
runway.
That's just crazy, and it just shows you
who we're dealing with here.
And just so it's clear, there's not some
narrative about Hamas or Hezbollah or tunnels or
civilian shield. Doesn't matter anymore. The US government
has made it clear that they don't care.
Here's the deadline. Oh, you don't you know,
you you didn't reach it, didn't follow through.
Who cares? Now they yell at you for
pointing out why they're not following through. These
people are monsters, and they're being caught in
real time even by the corporate media, which
is mindless crazy to me. Now in the
conversation of Israel first, I wanna point out
yet again that this is what you're hearing
in Israel. So as you have the the
last holdouts of the TeamSport Politics Republicans trying
to convince everybody this is the best cabinet
ever, like a Ben Shapiro,
even while half the conversation is going, oh
my god. This is crazy wrong,
here in Israel is what they're saying. And,
again, this was 13th where they're already somehow
aware that Marco Rubio was gonna be the
choice.
That tells me something. And I have just
3 points today where I can prove to
you that Israel somehow got insight who was
gonna be picked before the American people did.
I just I don't know how many more
points we really need to see to recognize
how alarming this is. But here's Israeli media.
This is from the day before yesterday, posted
yesterday, I believe, where they're talking about the
fact that they're super excited about the Israel
focus picks, which is exactly the problem that
we have. Not that because they're pro Israel
that that inherently means something wrong, but that
we know what Israel is accomplishing. They're committing
genocide, the Zionist forward
influence around all of this, and that's the
real point.
That this is about a country that is
committing a government that is committing genocide, that
is actively breaking international law everywhere you look.
And not only are they not doing anything
about it, they're arming it, they're supporting it,
they're telling you to blindly look the other
way.
That has to matter today. And here's what
they're saying in Israel.
And going back to Mike Wagonheim, Mike, just
in the past hour, the Trump,
team, confirming the pick of Mike Waltz as
the national security adviser. And I I don't
wanna exaggerate and say that Israel, the government
here, and its supporters are breathing a sigh
of relief over these picks, but certainly,
I think some of the concerns they had
about the next administration have been,
eased by picking,
certainly
these 3, and especially Marco Rubio,
Mike Waltz, people who have, for example, spoken
with I 24 News just in recent months
about their strong support of Israel and their
concerns over Iran. Okay. So why would they
be breathing a sigh of relief?
There's very clear ways to read into this.
So, hypothetically, if they had picked people that
weren't
violently pro Israel, well, they'd be going, oh,
no. Okay. Why?
Because they're doing something wrong, guys. You can't
even hide the reality. And maybe whether they
feel they're doing something wrong, they recognize the
world thinks they're doing something wrong. That's why
they were hoping they got people that would
blindly ignore their ongoing genocide or the fact
that you see it that way.
Either way you look at it, there's no
hiding the fact that they're acknowledging that we
recognize what they're doing
and going, oh, thank god we got the
pics we wanted.
You just can't make this up.
I'm not just breathing a sigh of relief,
Connor. They're they're dancing the horror right now
at the prime minister's office, with these, selections
by The prime minister is the guy who's
the most unpopular in in near history in
the country, literally multiple indictments. The country doesn't
want him in power. The people are protesting
him in personally and saying he's been maintaining
this war to keep himself in power. But,
yeah, the country is super excited. Now what
are they talking about is the Zionist structure
of this country. Most Israelis right now, Zionist
or otherwise, seem to be recognizing a problem
in their government. Even though I can clearly
point out most of them would continue the
occupation and ethnic cleansing of Palestine.
Both can exist in the same conversation. They
also see the dangers of what their government
think about how wild that is actually.
The the people that are supporting them are
the ones that are okay with what's happening,
and most of them are very Zionist. And
even they have concerns with how extreme their
own government is. It's not my opinion. It's
written all over Israeli media. That should be
pretty scary as they're handpicking the ones that
those Zionist extremists wanted.
1 of the guys we're talking about is
literally APAC's number one choice.
Donald Trump. I mean, we we were expecting
some isolationist that possibly in those positions or
maybe some, who lean at least a little
bit toward, Trump's,
new foreign policy and the MAGA foreign policy
hasn't been that case at all. I mean
Right. So do you think that mad that
means no longer doing what Israel wants to
do, which is what Trump pretends,
what he wants you to believe without actually
saying that? Most of these people out there,
especially the team sport politics people, which I
can guarantee they know they're lying, want you
to think that he's anti war. That what
he means is he's gonna stop this. And
don't worry. If he has q one on,
we're saving Israel for last.
It's amazing what people will believe. Rubio and
and Mike Waltz are in the mold of,
old school Republicans on policy,
both,
pro Israel stalwarts to to to the hilt.
They'll they'll challenge anybody who, views, the situation.
And these are outsiders?
Old school republicans are supposed to be the
outsiders bucking the deep state? Guys, they are
the deep state. Now I mean that almost
in a not really a joke, but the
reality is the deep state are not elected
officials, ladies and gentlemen. And clearly, I think
what's obvious is they can be used or
maybe you could argue an extension of, but
the reality is we're talking about the unelected
power structure.
And that is what that that's the lobbyist.
That is the what's level 1, if if
at all. We're talking about the powerful entities
that drive all of this, not the people
that are standing in front of you that
were paid to be there. So either way,
we're talking about people that are part of
that machine. And we wanna pretend like we're
fighting the deep state with oligarchs and billionaires
and technocrats and the people that are literally
building what we're all afraid of, but just
because they put a sticker on it that
says, Trump, Elon, that we all just look
the other way.
That's quite alarming. Otherwise, I mean, you couldn't
have selected, 2, 2 better picks, I think,
if you're, sitting in the prime minister's office
right now. And Elise Stefanik will be a
firebrand at the United Nations.
She already told Isaac Herzog in a meeting
this morning that she'll have, Israel's back there.
Went to Israel
again. Again, to to tell the the the
the Israeli government that she'll work for them.
I mean, literally.
She's not the president. She's not even in
a position of power yet in the context
of the new administration, and she's flying to
Israel?
She I mean, this is wild. You know
why? Because she would have done that anyway
because she's pro she is an Israel first
entity.
The idea that we're gonna pretend, I mean,
she might not even get the position if
something changes, but yet here she is flying
to Israel. It's pretty clear. We didn't expect
otherwise, but, always, always good to hear that
if you're, within the Israeli government in a
very problematic
institution like the UN. By the way, Marco
Rubio told us last Tuesday at Donald Trump's,
watch party on election night, that he, would,
with the Republicans taking over the senate, not
knowing then that he would be nominated likely
for secretary of state. He said that the
Republican senate should take up defunding
more UN agencies that he feels are, either
in cahoots with Hamas or turn a blind
eye, to those terror organizations,
that operate in Gaza and elsewhere. You know
why that's interesting? Because, obviously, there's a conversation
to be had about why the UN as
an entity is very problematic, especially from a
no state mindset.
But what that's not what they're actually saying.
They're talking about defunding entities that they argue
are connected to Hamas.
Not that they're I mean, if we end
up in a position where this is a
real conversation about not channeling it in a
direction they like, but actually getting rid of
some well, I when that happens, then we
can have that conversation. But what they float
are things that make you think the larger
thing is happening and they rarely follow through
with that. At the end of the day,
this is about shutting down entities that are
the lifeline for for Palestinians that have never
been allowed to have the right of return
to go back to their territory that the
use the Israeli government agreed to come back.
That's that's UNRA. The deep conversation, if you
don't understand it now, it's difficult to jump
into in 30 seconds. But UNRA is an
entity that was created after
the the ethnic cleansing in Nakba. And the
point is that that and with Israel, you
could look this stuff up on their own
statements. We're supposed to allow them to go
back to their land once the conflict had
resolved. They've never allowed that under the guise
that it's always been their fault that it
never happened, even though we can prove today
that they have maintained
action deliberately to keep this ongoing, like funding
Hamas. All on the record, even their Israeli
media talk about it. So it's important to
think about that. And so we the larger
point is important, but what we're talking about
within it all are simply just entities working
through these avenues to to
feed people that are starving and hopefully keep
track of the records that will allow them
to go back to where they're supposed to
be allowed to go back to. And so
that's what they're talking about. And, of course,
doing that under a guise of saying they're
connected to Hamas when they're not in a
larger sense. You realize they're now saying that
about just, I mean, people like Elon Levy
making it about the UN at large or
even
clumsily trying to make it about things in
Lebanon right now. These are American entities that
are pushing this for a foreign government on
that are based on flagrant lies.
That's pretty crazy.
Now here's another example. This is from Newsmax.
This is from yesterday.
The title says, Jewish group praises Trump for
pro Israel picks.
Okay. Interesting.
First line says, the Zionist Organization of America,
the leading major American Jewish organization no. Well,
see, that's that's what Zionism would conflate. Now
I'm not gonna tell you that there's not
Jewish people. Obviously, that's probably predominant.
My point is, by saying the Jewish group
as opposed to the Zionist group is the
entire play here.
It's like saying a republic instead of saying
a republican organization and calling it a Christian
organization. Well, maybe they're not Christian. You could
be a republican and not be Christian. You
could be Zionist and be Christian, or be
a Zionist and be an atheist.
Herzl was an atheist, the founder of Zionism.
And right now, today, there's a huge movement
within Israel, not movement as in they're stating
this publicly, but there's a clear I think
it was it was either Dan Cohen or
Eunice. One of these people were covering this
recently, and we talked about it on the
show, where there's Zionists that are screaming about
things in Israel about being an atheist Zionist.
So the bottom line is all I'm saying
there is that you can clearly point out
that just because it's Zionist does not make
it Jewish. And in fact, that is the
main point that a lot of Jews around
the world are beginning to haul out. So
what I'm showing you
is yet again,
specifically, the Zionist Organization of America is praising
his pro Zionist picks. That's the truth of
it.
And, yes, there's a lot of Jewish people
that are still caught up in the lie
around Zionism.
But I I find that to be very
important, the way this is all in, and
and you get these republican platforms that
are basically repeating the narrative.
And Zionism is an important point in all
of this, not just I mean, really,
excluding the religious aspect of it that they
add to it. Again, to be clear, if
you don't hear that, there are more Christian
Zionists in the world today than there are
Jewish Zionists.
Not that I'm just talking about Christians that
support it. I'm talking about people that are
saying I'm a proud I am a Christian
Zionist.
If we can't acknowledge that while they're trying
to make it every time you talk about
it, you secretly mean Jewish people, then then
you're blind to yourself.
The reason that's important is because of the
very alarming
extremist mentality, the prophetic kind of mindset of
the Zionists that are now finding their ways
into very, very high levels of power in
Trump's administration who are openly talking about the
3rd temple, talking about the chosen people, talking
about how we need to we're in the
end times. Huckabee is recently talking about that.
Hey. I'm not saying people can have their
religious beliefs, but if that's guiding their political
choices, which allows them to support an open
genocide,
maybe we should reflect on where this is
going and why it's problematic.
So Dan Cohen on the point of that,
caught responds to a jury here saying, when
you see Jews saying Zionism is not Judaism,
which it's not I mean, this is like
saying
that water is not land. I mean, it's
like, okay. They it's distinctly different. 1 is
a political organization that was founded 100 of
year. Those Judaism, which is 1000 of years
old. Okay. So it's not rocket science here
to recognize that one is not the other.
You can argue that they've overlapped and signed
it, but that's something that Zionism has created.
There's a lot of Zionists around or excuse
me, Jewish people around the world that call
out Zionism. So you can't keep pretending they're
the same unless you're arguing that Jews who
don't believe that are no longer Jews, which
makes my point for it. For it it's
there it's about Zionism then, not Judaism.
But she says it's like 5% of Jews
who think that way. That's false.
Verifiably false. And we've been talking about this
for a while. It has exploded since October
7th. She says most Jews, a 100% support
Zionism in Israel. That's, I mean, I mean,
I could maybe argue that most would be
accurate, but I I'm beginning to think that
that is a very close
it's becoming something that is growing rapidly towards
not being the majority anymore. That's my opinion.
But I think we can see it around
the world. And I've played endless amounts of
videos of people speaking out about it.
Spea specifically somebody like Avi Shalam, who is
a Israeli academic who's spoken about how it
is an apartheid state, which we all know.
And that ultimately, it is not Zionism is
racism. That's his point.
So what Dan says, Zionism was originally a
Christian protestant idea, and he's Dan himself is
Jewish. We've had interviews together. We talked about
oh, I think I'll include it real quick,
so
I thought I had that up. Here's the
interview we did recently
called the
Manufactured
Middle East Plight and the Zionism linchpin. Image
you can see the image right here of
this group of orthodox Jews in Israel saying,
Judaism
rejects Zionism and the state of Israel. I
mean, these people are protesting in in Israel,
getting beat up by the IDF for protesting
that you're what you're doing is hijacking Judaism.
So even if you disagree with that, recognize
it's not just racist people out there. You
got orthodox Jews who are trying to make
sure you see that Zionism has hijacked Judaism.
But he says, and today, Christian Zionists massively
outnumber Jewish Zionists.
See? Does that mean Christian equal Zionism?
Well, obviously not. It just means people of
different religions are influenced by evil and hateful
ideologies, whether Zionism or antisemitism
in as in the case of Joy Micah.
Very well said.
There we go. Now
Tim Pool recently came out, and I wanna
make a couple points about this as we
get into some of these picks. So starting
with one of the ones that we we
added later yesterday and didn't even get to,
frankly, is Matt Gaetz, which I find an
interesting choice because
of the interesting ground in regard to what
I mean, it seems that most Republicans were
kind of reflexively upset about that. At least
it's hard to see you know, it's hard
to tell what most social media seem to
represent that, which you could take that for
what you will. We know how manipulated everything
is.
But this was an interesting response. And I'm
beginning to see more and more the gatekeeping.
And I don't mean that in the sense
of the typical idea of a, you know,
person gatekeeping information, but this idea right now
around
the way you're supposed to think around, I
guess, just this one topic.
And a lot of people have been reacting
like this which I think kinda shows their
hand a bit. Whether you whether they know
that or not. I think what I'm sensing
is this clear effort to,
more than ever, make sure that this this
administration gets more support than ever for, again,
I can't stop seeing how clearly this seems
to be rapidly escalating in the direction of
something that will be
the next phase of where we go. And
I've you know what I think about that,
about technocracy, about the digital IDs, the social
credit, all the things that are, By the
way, this is not some hypothetical conversation. They're
all right there. They're all working on this
in Trump's administration talking about the biometric wall.
It's all coming. And I think the design
was to roll it out under Trump's administration
here. But he says any Republican who obstructs
or blocks Matt Gaetz' confirmation, so again, in
the senate conversation,
will receive the full political force I can
muster up to make sure you lose your
next primary.
Wow.
And I know I'm not the only one
who feels this way. I mean, look, you
do whatever you want. You're allowed to say
what you want, act the way you want.
You don't have to, you know just because
I would argue, as I said,
journalists don't endorse candidates, which I think is
obvious, let alone threaten others for not supporting
them.
Not to say you you could disagree. Be
whatever you want. Do whatever you want. I'm
not trying to tell you how to act
or feel. What I'm saying is from an
objective perspective,
somebody who professes to be a journalist
doesn't the idea and David Icke recently made
this point about Tucker Carlson and the rest.
This this is, in my mind, counterintuitive. It
is the antithesis of being a journal. You
don't if you're endorsing candidates, then you are
no longer an objective, unbiased perspective. We all
have our biases, but you're supposed to be
informing about what's going on, letting people make
their own decisions.
Now that's just one step. The next step
to say that if you do
like, okay.
The idea that somebody could
block him,
Republican or otherwise oh, I guess he's specifically
Republican. Okay. So you got a Republican in
the Senate that goes, well, I don't agree
with Matt. I think he's the worst choice
in this country.
But now you're telling him he shouldn't act
on the way he believes because you'll go
after him? So now you're gonna go after
a person because they're doing what they believe
in in that hypothetical scenario? Well, that's what
would happen. Then you find that just ludicrous?
So this is somebody who is slashing out
and go, I will go after anybody in
the car in political position who tries to
stop this.
Does that seem normal?
I mean, even the way people emotionally respond
in the chat, I find crazy
that we have gone into some next level
scenario here, guys, where some of these people
are acting crazy irrational.
And I think that shows something.
By the way, what I think the funniest
part of this tweet was people down and
go, he's not a journalist. And I'm like,
guys, that's what I just said. That's literally
the point of what I'm saying. Like, you're
crazy. He's never been a journalist. Like, that's
what I just said. Journalists don't. That's the
point. Anyway, I think that's funny how language
seems to be a dying art in this
country. But either way, what I think is
so wild is that anybody would make these
statements, let alone those who profess to be
a journalist or whatever you think he claims
he is, a reporter,
an aggregator, which all those are I I
make those differentiate differentiations as well,
but I find that to be alarming.
Now Trump picks far right congressman Matt Gaetz
as attorney general, reads The Guardian.
Just so it's clear that this is being
put forward and this has been acknowledged by
Trump and everybody else. I'm not really interested
in the framing of the corporate media about
these people. I'm more interested in the bigger
picture around specifically the focus of today, about
around foreign government influence.
There's a lot of other things we can
get into. And I'm not even trying to
suggest for each of them that this is
the most important point. This is simply just
the focus of the show for for yesterday
and today.
Now, APAC tracker points out something, says Matt
Gaetz isn't funded by the Israeli lobby, which
frankly, I almost find that hard to believe.
That's my opinion. Go on. I I I'm
willing to bet you there is some different
overlapping influence
because of how all encompassing all this is.
But this person goes, no. He just gets
on his knees for no charge at all.
And you could find this just like everybody
else. Here's APAC. Thank you, Matt Gaetz, for
your outspoken and unequivocal support of our ally
Israel, where it says, I'm closely monitoring the
terrorist attacks by Hamas in Israel today on
October 7th.
Here it is on, I believe that's what,
Instagram, and it says the terror
raining down on Israel.
Is Wait, is that a
Did he misspell raining? Is that really what
he wrote? Or am I crazy? That raining,
that would not apply.
Wow.
Is that Hopefully, that's a fake one then.
That's pretty embarrassing. Anyway, unless I'm missing something,
it says it's unjustified, unacceptable.
Iran has persistently spread violence to the Middle
East. That's not true. Objectively false. And to
the detriment of all its neighbors, well, obviously
not.
You could say they're the worst country in
the world, but what they're saying is false.
Israel and United States have caused, hands down,
more destabilization,
destruction, murder, rape, burning of than anybody else
in this conversation,
even their extremist that they fund.
But he says America stands in Israel. Now
realize what this is talking about is not
Iran, but we're this is about the legally
protected act of armed resistance under the 14th
Convention of International Law. Whatever crime was committed,
which there were, does not invalidate that act.
But here we have people acting like they're
fighting for you when what they're doing is
blindly ignoring the law and support of a
foreign country at your expense. So, personally, I
find it quite hard to to think there's
not some level of influence there. Maybe he's
the one that has blackmail. Let's realize that
is a huge level of this. I'm just
throwing out there as a possible reality, and
we can see the Epstein network, the overlap
of the CIA and Mossad, the public admission
by Acosta. We know what these things are.
That's one element. So either way, the point
is to to worry that while these people
are committing genocide, somebody like Matt Gaetz is
openly supporting them.
Now Whitney writes, Matt Gaetz, Trump's pick to
be attorney general, argued against reevaluating Epstein's sweetheart
deal.
More to that point. More recently, one of
his closest associates has been actively lobbying to
free Ghislaine Maxwell, claiming she and Epstein were
patriots. It's not a joke, guys.
This is Gumby saying in 2019, before Epstein
was arrested, Matt Gaetz and his Epstein sweetheart
deal
said that Epstein sweetheart deal from Alex Acosta,
who I just mentioned, should not be reexamined,
arguing that it would be dangerous to do
so.
What?
You know, the sweetheart deal that basically let
him skate by until they
whatever happened. You know, you could argue the
obvious anomaly that was to Epstein and how
that went down.
But what's alarming is how overlapped this all
is
to one of the most
publicly discussed sexual blackmail networks we've ever seen.
To not reexamine the deal that allowed him
to skate by would be dangerous?
How so?
In 2019,
mind you, guys.
That's pretty crazy.
And then, the the
he's she follows up. Gates is also about
to marry the sister of Peter Thiel's protege,
Palmer Luckey,
who she's written about many times, completely tied
into the larger agenda, who is building the
surveillance system on the US Mexico border as
well as the DOD's project Maven in AI
weapons.
Fantastic. Right? Exactly what you want. The e
the outsider, the deep fighting the deep state,
except it's the
on paper, the exact opposite. Now it says
Chuck Johnson is close to Gates. Gates even
invited him to his to as his guest
to the, State of the Union.
Johnson is also a close ally of Peter
Thiel, who met with Epstein several times and
is a CIA contractor who backed the Aurelian
car by 911 with Epstein.
Now this is
I'll bring it up in a second. It
was
let's see. I think it's spy. There it
is. An An article Whitney wrote a while
back for TLav,
the prince and the spy, and this has
to do with Eric Prince and a Israeli
spy, legitimately on the record, and carbine 911
and the aggressive influence of Israeli startup companies,
really just their intelligence apparatus, into the United
States and other countries to their detriment.
And that's one of them is carbine 911,
now called just carbine. And it says, and
Johnson connected with Thiel and the with the
FBI, leading Thiel to become an FBI informant.
Hello? Follows Johnson's views on Maxwell and Epstein.
Lastly, she says Johnson, an alt right in
quotes personality, is reportedly the cofounder of Clearview
AI, which we've all talked about. The Thiel
backed venture that scrapped Facebook and other sites
for all your pictures scraped, excuse me, for
all your pictures
and to make one of the biggest facial
recognition databases in the world. The company openly
brags about IDing Trump supporters present at the
Capitol on January 6th for law enforcement, leading
to riot or arrests.
These are the people that are guiding this
administration. Like, how do we not there's I
mean, everything we're discussing. The the the follow-up
point or question is how are we not
outraged about this? How are we not alarmed
about this? Speaking to conservatives specifically,
everything about this would be not just a
red flag. It'd be a no go red
line. You shall not cross if it was
anybody on the other side.
Gates' wife, she continues in the picture above,
is the sister of Palmer Luckey, another Theal
protege who is building the Orwellian surveillance system,
IE, the virtual border wall that Trump's talking
about on the US border,
US Mexico border as well as the DOD's
project Maven and semi and fully autonomous AI
weapons.
With a Thiel connected or Thiel connected VP
and Trump's own son now working for a
Thiel linked VC firm, that's the whole Donald
Junior discussion,
the influence of Thiel who built the company
with the CIA that profiles Americans and decides
if they might be domestic terrorists or not,
on the new iteration of the Trump administration
should be deeply scrutinized.
That's the point of today, ultimately, one of
the many is that this is not happening.
That there are far too many who are
willing to ignore how alarming this is.
Now, Andrew Tate, of course, comes out and
says, been going down the Matt Gaetz rabbit
hole since his appointment. And, and the guy's
a badass, he says. Okay. Well,
pretty sure that's not what you want is,
you know, a human trafficker out there supporting
you for government. But, I mean, obviously, the
reality if you don't understand the information that
has been proven by, I mean, everything, but
Milpark TV has done a great job of
breaking down what these people really are. And
it is disgusting that anybody ever gave these
people a platform or ever pretended like they
weren't the epitome of the lowest common denominator.
That these pea that or or the lies
that Candace Owen and Tucker Carlson allowed them
to spew that we could instantaneously
prove they were lying about.
No pushback. No journalism. Just let them lie
to you about who they are because there's
a bigger agenda playing out here.
But my point, obviously, is that for someone
like him to endorse him is probably not
a good sign for Matt Gaetz. But people
people that wanna believe Andrew Tate is some
kind of a hero might think otherwise, but
I'm willing to believe that's a smaller portion
than you think.
You see, Cracker said, you could tell about
the meltdown on the left, how good a
pick it is. You see how stupid this
is?
So let's just even say that he he
and let's just say I'll I'll say everything
else aside.
That because the left freaks out that that's
what makes him good, well, this is what
everyone keeps pointing out. These are these these
I mean, whatever you wanna call people like
this with 3,000,000 followers on Twitter, clearly influential
in in the conversation for Republicans.
And the only bar we're talking about or
the let's just say the clear bar that's
being set, whether there's more of them, is
that if it irritates the left. Right? If
the if if it makes the left look
bad,
that's what's guiding Paul guys, that's terrifying.
These are children behind the wheel, and that's
what we should be worried about right now.
Lindsey Graham, of course, came out and was
very
no. Matt Gaetz is bad.
Until somebody tapped him on the shoulder and
he goes, wait. Never mind. Matt Gaetz is
good.
Now you can read about it. That sums
up a long point about how this moron
came out screaming bad things, then on a
dime, switches around about how, let's give him
a chance.
Do you not see the instantaneous
influence from something?
Now I'm you can decide what that something
is. I'm sure there's an obvious point to
make.
To me, it's across the board right now.
Lockstep.
Now what we're seeing though, and this is
coming from Axios and and Guardian. So, again,
obviously, take it with a grain of salt.
But what we're and this my point is
I've already seen a lot of Republicans making
points about Gates, about Rubio.
Pretty prominent Republican accounts. Not the team sport
politics like Gafford there, but the rest of
them. People that are objective enough to go,
ah, that's a bad pick, but maybe I
still like the team.
But what we're seeing, it says republicans, quote,
stunned and disgusted as Matt taps Matt Gaetz
or excuse me, as Trump taps Matt Gaetz
for AG.
Here's The Guardian. Calls grow to release the
ethics report into Matt Gaetz sexual misconduct claims,
US political life. Now this one is from,
oh, I got I thought this was old.
This is from today. But the point being
is that there's an in it's an interesting
choice of all the people, and I think
it's because it's people that are lockstep for
the next coming agenda. And Brian Lee Pro
is real.
Now going to what we went through yesterday,
I wanna make sure you saw these points
before we get into the rest of the
cabin picks. But this is important to see
that as you here's Daily Mail that you
probably already saw. Trump is naming both Elon
and Vivek to basically dual manage the department
of government efficiency, which again, I said yesterday
is pretty embarrassing, quite frankly. Are they not
able to do it alone? Do they have
to tag team it and work together? I
mean, it almost seems like they need a
chaperone or something. That's a very strange choice
to make. Now I asked yesterday, but let
me know what you think in regard to
whether or not I I mean, is there
a precedent for that? I don't remember seeing
2 of 2 people
nominated for one position.
That seems strange to me, but maybe I'm
missing something. Now, overall, the bottom line point
is that both of them are being chosen
for this
and they plan to
have what they claim is gonna be accomplished
by January 4th, 20 26th.
Now, sure, I hope all I hope I
hope what they're doing is genuine. I hope
they're gonna actually reduce the size of the
government and make it more efficient. Or really,
if we're gonna make it more efficient, that
means making it not exist, quite frankly, because
government in and of itself is inefficient
by design.
But I think we all know if we're
being objective about what they've done in the
past, the reality of any of these people's
choices go up till now that it's probably
not gonna go the way you think it
is. I hope I'm wrong. But my overarching
point is this is gonna be about trying
to use this
as an like, same with, like, the points
of the fed, anything else, to say, we're
gonna do the thing we've always been talking
about that has been always regarded as ridiculous
even by many of these people. Now suddenly,
it's like, yes. End the fed because I
think what's happening is it's a it's a
shell game. They're gonna make it look as
if things are shifting or maybe they even
come out and destroy the fed
only to make sure that what is in
its place is the new CBDC structure or
whatever these next steps are. That's what I'm
seeing build. On this,
I think it's about trying to give you
the new structure as if we're destroying the
old, when in reality, they're just it's just
time for them to transition to what comes
next.
I really hope I'm wrong. But here's Donald
Trump posting this on Truth Social that they
have been chosen.
David Icke simply says, Trump gives Peter Thiel's
AI, Nate Musk, and Thiel's business associate, Ramaswamy,
new job in government running the, as they
literally called it, the Manhattan project of our
time, which I commented on yesterday. This seems
like a really ridiculous overlap, but I don't
even know how they think that connects. And
there's a lot of very bad connotations that
go along with that, but maybe that's the
point.
And it says, to dismantle Washington's bureaucracy and
waste,
dismantling regulation, as he points out, to facilitate
the, AI human fusion agenda. Now that's an
interesting point on the other side of it.
Right? I made a point about regulation and
so on. The idea being that if we
were gonna get rid of the state well,
yes. That's I'm I'm in line with all
of that. But all all they're really doing
is reducing the the
restrictions that some of these companies have on,
I don't know, dumping things in your water,
that doesn't sound like a good choice to
me. But, of course, when you frame it
as if they're trying to do you know,
really, what they're trying to do is tap
into things like what we're talking about. Tap
into the libertarian movement. Tap into cryptocurrency in
order to keep you thinking that they're thinking
like you are. They're not.
It's to it's transparent based on their open
discussions, based on what their actions have been
in the past. They are using these things,
in my opinion, to trick you into thinking
they wanna destroy the state, that they wanna
get rid of the 3 letter agencies when
literally they are building these things out in
front of you.
You. So he's saying, in this case, dismantle
regulation to facilitate the new switch to AI
human fusion agenda that Elon Musk and the
rest are talking about. It's pretty it's an
alarming thing to consider. Now what's weird is
this tweet is now deleted,
but I have it on the screen or
it look on the video, basically, from what
I was my show yesterday. So I don't
know why this tweet was deleted. There's a
lot of these things from yesterday to today,
which I find interesting.
But this was about and I I still
have the actual lawsuit right here, so it's
it is a real thing. It's not I
don't know why this was deleted. His point
on the
tweet was simply saying, the United States district
court for district of Delaware, where Vivek Vivek
Ramaswamy,
the, the was board chairman of Roviant Sciences
up to a year after the lawsuit for
the patented delivery method of nanotechnology in the
COVID vaccines was filed.
And this is about the this is important
to see, and this is them suing Arbita,
specifically,
suing
Moderna and Pfizer. And I find this very
interesting that this is specifically around the idea
of the lipid nanoparticles
and why that is
like a a praiseworthy thing. Now quickly to
go over this again is simply saying that
they're claiming Moderna and Pfizer, by the way,
are using their technology.
And I I think it's alarming to see
how many overlaps we have of Vance and
Vivek being invested in the biopharmaceutical
direction. Trump's still pretending the vaccine saved everyone's
lives and nobody died because of it. It's
wild.
Every single huge red flag around damn near
every topic is right in front of you.
But because Trump and Elon, it seems like
people just don't wanna acknowledge it until now.
It's starting to fall apart, it seems.
But I'll leave it there because I went
over in-depth yesterday, but the point is that
that's a pretty alarming thing. That the and
I I don't include the articles about this
problem. Study finds MRA platform itself is what's
driving myocarditis.
This one discussing the idea that the lipid
nanoparticle spike protein design is deadly.
And that's what they're all fighting over to
say we did it, and it's ours, and
you owe us money for killing everybody.
It's just crazy to me that we can't,
as specifically
conservatives, that that's not something that would be
a no go for you. Or, I don't
know, Trump continue to support the deadly shot.
And here's a study back from, 2020
2021.
The mRNA and lipid nano particle platforms lipid
nano particle, the thing they're fighting over,
is highly inflammatory.
One of the many reasons why it is
dangerous.
Oh, and this quickly just to include these
for you. All of this will be included
in the show notes if you wanna go
deeper. I've more sure did yesterday, but just
showing you the bat the arbiters, Genovat gain
and edge and COVID patent scrap with Moderna
or the archived version of Pfizer accused of
COVID 19 vaccine patent infringement from the same
companies.
And this is just a conversation about mod
RNA versus mRNA, and the reality that that's
what they're all building, and they're all continuing
to support.
And the overlap of the people that were
working on that. Going back to the origin
of this conversation. From Bob Langer, the coronavirus
common denominator with direct ties to Charles Lieber,
and the building of their lipid nano particle.
You know, it it goes much bigger than
this. It goes into optogenetics,
magnetogenetics,
and, you know, even the overlap with Elon
Musk brain chip conversation. All of this is
leading in the same direction if you've been
paying attention. Then this one, the Charles Leiber
connection from nanotechnology to COVID 19 to technocracy.
Now, Susie Wiles, just to highlight that on
the back of the pharmaceutical point which we
made yesterday, she is literally both an ex
Tobacco and Big Pharma lobbyist, but is also
still a lobbyist for Mercury Public Affairs, which,
by the way, has clientele such as Pfizer,
the Gavi vaccine alliance.
All I mean, many different points that make
it alarming that this would be the choice
for your chief of staff.
Maybe because she's also in mind to argue
that the vaccine helped everybody. On top of
the fact that we're gonna get to a
clip later in the show toward the end
that Greg Reese put out that that argues
that and I think this was somebody with
interviewing with Renz and some others, the point
being made that inside republican circles, they're arguing
that you can't even talk to Trump without
Susie's okay right now.
Now that's interesting to me. I guess that
could just be her position. But my point
is to show you republicans that are very
uneasy about that.
So if you're out there only listening to
these well, rather conservative listening to this
partisan conversation about how this is the best
thing ever, like Ben Shapiro. I mean, guys,
not even conservatives right now are predominantly saying
that, as far as I can tell. So
it just shows you what this is really
about. They're willing to challenge you too. Now
from Elon's perspective, which is what I think
this is most I mean, Vivek and his
biopharmaceutical
connections are scary, but this is wild to
me.
Because w this seems like a crazy deviation
from from I mean, Elon Musk is very
clear about what he puts forward as what
he thinks is the efficient thing for the
future, but Vance and Trump and everybody else
seems to have a completely different opinion. So
and that's maybe why Vivek was put in
there with him, to kind of chaperone Elon
Musk. Who knows? But it says, either we
get government efficiency, Elon Musk writes, or America
goes bankrupt, which, you know, no brainer.
My point is they're pointing at things that
are the most obvious things in the world
right now that we've all been seeing for
a very long time, but now they want
you to think, we see it.
I hope they I hope they do. I
hope they change it, but I think every
piece of evidence points to the opposite. It's
about saying, look, look, change. We need to
do this, then change in the direction that
they've always been planning.
That's what I see. I I made that
clear.
I'm worried about this combining with the other
to drive us into a CBDC discussion, which
they are openly pushing.
Now not in the context of we're gonna
bring out in like, the JPMorgan
overlap or the idea of the new Bitcoin
background. They've made these things clear that people
like Castronauts and Fitz have been very clearly
highlighting for you. But if you listen to
Tucker and the rest, they'll tell you something
different.
But it says, that's what it comes down
to. Wish I were wrong.
And here, he says, all the actions of
the Department of Government Efficiency will be posted
on online for maximum transparency. I'm at this
point again with the RFK Junior thing in
a second. The point is that I don't
know why we think this is, I mean,
we can now hope
that they'll listen to every American to post
something on this website, but hope should not
be what guides your choices.
It can influence it, but the reality is
it based on facts, based on precedent, and
reality is that these things never pan out
like that.
That ultimately, they're gonna do what they decide,
and this gives them the illusion of inflow
of credence to that they cared what you
had to say. Now using this, they can
argue that they're doing what the people want.
When in reality, it seems like most people
don't want what they're putting forward if you
really look at the information.
But it says anytime the public thinks that
cutting something is important, then let us know.
And this guy responds saying, the impact of
this on will have on governments around the
world cannot be overstated.
What can't be overstated is the kind of
embarrassingly naive the embarrassing naivety of people that
are acting like because they write things online
that we know this is gonna change the
world. He says the entertainment value will be
epic. Things like that worry me.
Is this what the entertainment value?
I mean, I I I don't even need
to explain. I mean, my I'm mute. Whatever.
I don't know why that kind of a
comment around these things shouldn't worry people. Or
the department of government efficiency, the merge will
be on fire. Now, yes. People are gonna
simply say because it's easier that he's trolling
or he's making a joke. Maybe. Maybe.
But historically, there's been things just like this.
They're just as crazy that turn out not
to be. But it's easy to dismiss what
you don't think is right because you wanna
pretend something in the moment as opposed to
just acknowledging the reality in front of you.
Now here's my bigger point about this.
So Elon Musk is making this point very
clear. Solar power will be the vast majority
of power generation in the future. That was
on November 12th.
Well, this guy simply goes false and also
dumb. You're better than this. Now, whatever your
opinion is out there, that's not the point
I'm making. The point is that republicans
seem to, by and large, not agree with
this. Now we I've gone into my opinion
around the the the idea that these things
have value or use, but not being forced
and not and, obviously, don't even seem to
be scalable right now based on a lot
of different factors, let alone the obvious detriment
to the environment that they claim that you
know, there's so many examples like this or
even the electric vehicle conversation and mining for
lithium, the destruction of our environment in order
to pretend to save the environment.
Excuse me. I think at the end of
the day, there are ways this can help.
But I don't think I mean, right now
what's I mean, again, I can go into
the deep conversation around that. I think it's
up in the air and I don't think
anything anything should ever be forced.
But this is not what it seems conservatives
agree with. Here's another comment. Except here's Alex
Finn saying, alright. Is there anything that Elon
won't revolutionize?
It's just embarrassing to me. Embarrassing.
But Cat Turd says with 8%
inflation, this is 2022, and gas at $5
per gallon, the last thing Americans wanna hear
about is their solar fairy tale.
Well, Elon disagrees. And I'm sure if Elon
came out and said things right now that,
you know, you can see I well, I
don't wanna the point is you know how
this goes. And I've already seen the examples
of people like this that will suddenly tomorrow
say, because Elon points to it, then it's
a better thing even though it's the same
conversation.
Or he says, Joe Biden is about as
useless as solar and wind energy.
Well, here's Tucker Carlson, 9 months ago, saying
solar power is a scam.
Here he is 9 months ago in a
different interview, different video saying that they lied
to you about solar power.
Here he
is, 2019.
Solar power is not air placement of fossil
fuels.
Now I'm not even saying right or wrong.
I'm simply highlighting that there are people that
are immersed in this cabinet or tangential to
it that have a very different opinion about
that.
Before you even go to electric car point,
doesn't that seem concerning that we have a
deviation there that people aren't acknowledging?
I think it's because the obvious is that
all of those things are coming, and you
don't wanna align that with the republican mindset
because clearly that is the great reset push.
Now I'm not saying that solar energy is
that, but that is the concern that we've
seen through conservatism, but it doesn't get highlighted
when it comes from Elon Musk.
Here's Alex Jones saying, Trump pledges to end
electric car subsidies and promote the US auto
industry back to worldwide dominance.
Okay. Whatever you think about it, it's interesting
to point out that JD Vance agrees, thinks
that EVs are a scam.
This is from 2024.
Elon Musk seems to be fine with it.
This is from Business Insider.
Here's Elon Musk. October 1st this year, almost
all vehicles will be purely electric long term.
Combustion cars will be like be a niche
like horses.
I just think that worthy of notation that
this is the guy that supposedly, at least
in tandem, gonna be
making the government more efficient. Now is this
what you think is more efficient?
Doesn't that matter?
Should.
Well, in case you missed it last time,
here is the clip that shows you that
Elon Musk is checking all the boxes for
the great reset
whether you wanna acknowledge it or not. Nobody
will be safe
if not everybody is vaccinated.
Are you vaccinated, if I may? Yes. Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I'm very probably pro
vaccination. I believe, it's the science is unequivocal.
Can you imagine, sir, that in 10 years
when we are sitting here, we have an
implant in our
brains and,
I can immediately feel because you all will
have implants. Just think of sensors
planted into our brains. Basically,
implanted in your skull. So
but it would be
flush with your skull. So you basically,
take out a chunk of skull, replace put
the neurolink device in there.
You you put the
the electrode you insert the electrode threads very
carefully into the the brain. It doesn't change
what you are doing. It changes you if
you take a genetic editing. It's a fusion
of
the physical, the digital,
and the biological
world.
That's
really
the essence of the 4th industrial revolution. A
merger with biological intelligence
and machine intelligence. An effort for man to
merge with machine in a healthy way. Yes.
To beat machines, you basically have to merge
with machines. Most likely, yes. As work is
changing, is a universal basic income,
really a a solution to the to this
problem? I I think ultimately we will have
to have some kind of universal basic income.
And I think some kind of a universal
basic basic income is gonna be necessary.
Decarbonization
of the economy. Where are they traveling? How
are they traveling? What are they eating?
What are they consuming on the platform?
So individual
carbon footprint tracker.
Stay tuned. We don't have it operational yet,
but this is something that we're working on.
I mean, my top recommendation, honestly, would be
just to have a carbon tax. Cisco reset
is necessary.
Now, here's another example that I think is
interesting.
Talking about government efficiency. Right? Well, a quick
point I made more in more length yesterday,
just to quickly point out, is there's a
big difference between being a successful businessman
who, you know, by the skin of your
teeth or whatever you wanna talk about, you
know, with the hard work, succeed, and profit,
as opposed to somebody who can basically fail
repeatedly until you can have enough money to
actually succeed. Or, like, Trump, getting many bankruptcies
until being bailed out by enough other wealthy
people. The point is that you could highlight
the fact that he's Musk has had a
lot of spectacular failures or company rockets that
continue to fail or cars that continue to
crash. And just you have enough money, enough
backing to just keep doing it until you
finally, I guess, quote succeed, whatever that ultimately
means if you've been failing that long. It's
and that's not to say that there's not
other successful dynamics. But the reality is even
PayPal's we've highlighted. This is not what it
appears to be. I'm not of the mind
this person has this this genius of our
time that people are trying to make it
out to be. I think you can pretty
much prove the opposite. Not to say stupid,
but either way, there's plenty of examples of
how this is not the person who's efficient
at anything. Unless it means spending enough money
to eventually succeed, which is not what we're
talking about. Now here's an example from 2023.
Elon Musk breaks world record for largest loss
of personal fortune in history.
Sounds efficient. $182,000,000,000
when Tesla shares went down, which I argue
I can't believe that hasn't happened more. What
kind of car company can succeed after cars
crashing? It's because they've been this is a
government agenda.
Whatever they were doing, mapping this or you
you're trying to work out the electric car
dynamic, you're allowed to have cars on the
on the on the streets that crash.
Brand can almost con continuously.
How was that continue to be allowed? Something
was this was an overlapping government agenda. I
think it's obvious. So either way, the point
is this was a big deal. Lost a
huge amount of money. And then right now,
the main point is there's another little point
in between. But Elon Musk's net worth now
rockets to over 300,000,000,000. He's now the richest
person on the planet. Quite the outsider. Right?
Quite the rebel fighting the deep state.
The richest person in the world who is
literally a government contractor working for defense contractors
for the government in a and multiple very,
very important agendas for the government. Technocrat, billionaire,
oligarch, Zionist, but, you know, quite an outsider.
My point on this is that it all
happened very recently. $70,000,000,000
alone
just since Trump's victory.
Now my again my point again is that,
ultimately, is this about succeeding or simply being
aligned with the right people?
You know, the I I think it's obvious
that this is not this is this is
a construct.
And then this is just crazy to me.
Elon Musk has become so wealthy that the
gap between him and Jeff Bezos, the 2nd
richest person in the world, is equivalent to
the GDP of Luxembourg.
Outsiders.
Here's Decentered News pointing out this kind of
weird view that he might be on their
side, but I think I find it to
be very naive
and,
quite frankly, probably deceptive. Like, from the point
being that they might be on that or
not or know this isn't the case. But
here's what he said. Anticipate that they were
going to create an alternative to the media
that they controlled. What I said yesterday was
just a simple point that that's ridiculous.
Right? What he's pointing to is the recent
mainstream alternative media
that David Eich has coined and he's been
the point he's makes. They people like David
Eich have been doing this for decades.
But he wants you to believe that they
somehow didn't anticipate that people would would make
media and and and fight back,
which by the way is not what the
mainstream alternative media is doing. They are part
of the agenda, which is not it's so
obvious.
They're and, again, whether they know it or
not, they are progressing the agenda. I we
can see it pla taking place.
He wants you to think that they weren't
prepared for that. But he's skipping over as
of decades of time where people like myself
in the latter half of it, but people
before that have been fighting with the independent
media.
The idea that they didn't see that is
the I mean, this is the laziness. This
is how you can make this I don't
know why anybody would digest that, would take
that at face value. That seems ridiculous.
That's how little they understand. They created a
rebellion.
There's now a
very
influential,
if not powerful, group of people across a
wide spectrum
discussing
what those
elites are up to. Yeah. And there's been
people doing that for decades. People that are
very influential with huge followings,
just just happened to not be directly connected
to some Zionist organization or tapped into the
government itself.
I guess those are the we you know,
as always, they want you to think that
the person that is half a step removed
from the mainstream is somehow on your side
suddenly because they say so.
Certainly could be. Consider that.
But it's embarrassing to pretend like this hasn't
been going on for a very long time.
And quite frankly, he must know that. So
it seems
like a red flag to me. Right? We
even, I think, have elites of our own.
I I I Elitists.
They're not elites, which imply they're better than
you. Elitists are people that believe they're better
than you.
He knows the difference between the words. Can't
be certain,
but
Musk
doesn't look like he's on their team to
me.
Despite all of the obvious points of how
he's literally on their team or the actions
he takes, which literally benefits them. But because
he screams things like I fight for free
speech, wait, which you can prove he's not,
he doesn't seem like it.
How can anybody fall for this?
Now Free Prince makes a good point. The
so called red pill right, the ones who
claim to see beyond the lies
are incapable of looking deeper than the first
layer they're handed. They say they're anti establishment
awake to the fake news, see conspiracies where
others don't, but they only lifted the surface,
the layer designed for them to find. Like
I said before, it's like saying, well, the
media says this, therefore, the opposite's true. Of
course, they can think further than that, and
they're using that to manipulate so many that
wanna pretend that it's easy to just go
the opposite's true.
They're told that Trump is their anti establishment
savior, and they accept it without question. As
if one man alone could dismantle the system
so vast and entrenched, they believe they're rejecting
the official story, but they're following a script
all the same. A script that's been crafted
to pacify them with a simple hero, an
essay, a easy enemy,
and a neatly packaged narrative.
They don't dig deep enough to find out
that their side is as corrupt as the
counterpart because it doesn't they don't want to.
It's easier to believe in a savior than
to confront the deeper, uglier truths about control
and manipulation
even when they're all even within their own
camp. They say they see the puppet strings,
but they're right
where they're supposed to be. Playing the role
assigned to them. Be better. Our freedom depends
on it. Now, again, my point is that
I see this as being the the democrats
and republicans. They both are falling for it
the same way.
His point is are you know, that
I would argue that there are more conservatives
as in his point from that side of
the conversation that are becoming aware of this
stuff. I'm arguing and asking for people like
that to have the courage to stand up
and point it out, which, again, I'm seeing
a lot. A lot today, especially.
But here's a libertarian, Clint Russell, saying, Vivek
and Elon are 2 of the smartest people
in the country.
To task them with dismantling government agencies might
be the the most innovative libertarian idea I've
ever seen put into action aside from founding
our country.
A revolution of firings with no gunpowder. Gosh.
I just it makes me embarrassed. I think
it's crazy that we can pretend that we
no one know what's even gonna happen,
or the idea that somehow that these things
are actually, I mean, libertarian.
I mean, it's the same point about Peter
Thiel and the rest of them. They because
they say things, we get the I I
don't know why anybody who believes in these
principles would pretend like these people represent any
of that.
Certainly hope so.
That's quite a strong statement.
Smartest people in the country,
that's pretty terrifying.
Well, here's Glenn Beck saying, CNN's freaking out
about how close Elon is working with real
Donald Trump.
Wow, he says, how terrible that the Thomas
Edison of our time is helping the future
president rebuild America. Not in secret, but out
in the open for everyone to see.
These people are this is the kind of
point I'm making.
This
this journalists don't
saying things like that now before they've even
gotten into position
shows you they've chosen a side. It's the
same point about Tim Pool. That's not what
a journalist does. That is what a he's
pandering. He is fighting for that side. He
is trying to convince you before we can
even prove what we know will happen.
My point is they could end up doing
the opposite of what he's saying by because
of something
else. Because the democrats made them do it
or because they got trapped or whatever. My
point is always the same, to pretend like
we know that this is the case, or
even more embarrassing, call the Thomas Edison of
our time.
These people are invested.
When you're invested in something, you're not looking
for ways to challenge it. Journalists should be
holding their feet to the fire, most importantly,
the people they believe in.
These people are trying to convince you of
something. Maybe you should wonder why,
Especially with all the blindness when it comes
to the Zionist influence.
Elon responds, I'm having an awesome time.
Cool. Because that's what we all want, for
you to enjoy yourself, Elon. Rear Donald Trump
is such a great guy. He really is.
One person after another has told me how
kind he's been. He's just what?
What are we are we in kindergarten? Why
are we being these people treat you like
you're you're 10 years old.
Like this. Hey. Look. You're the Marvel team.
Treat team of the century. More stellar Trump
picks,
says the Zionist. Well, let's take a look
at that. K? We talked about this guy
the last show or the show before last.
What was it? Zelen or,
yeah, Zeldin.
And this is one of the shows we
recently did. This is this was on the
11th, the the show before last. Trump's and
this is before we even saw most of
these picks. Trump's deep state Zionist admin picks,
which now it's even more obvious.
Jason Bessler highlights first the Zionist side of
it. The 5 big technocrats who fund Donald
Trump's campaign, Peter Thiel,
Timothy Mellon,
Mary Madelson, David Sachs, Elon Musk. And he
highlights main reasons why we should be concerned
about Elon Musk, which I pretty much just
went over. And he highlights our TLAB article
right here. Election, 2024, Zionist technocrats versus Zionist
technocrats, showing you that whichever party won, the
same thing was gonna happen.
And just to point out Zelda again, in
case she didn't see the past show, openly
introducing anti BDS stuff. So that means he
is anti your constitutional rights.
Whatever you wanna think about BDS, the point
is you have a right to boycott, divest,
or ask for sanctions from your government.
But he doesn't want you to be allowed
to do that only when it comes to
Israel.
Because let's be clear. If you wanna stand
up and say, let's boycott China, he'd be
like, absolutely.
But except when it happens with Israel, he
tells you you're not allowed to. So too
will literally everyone he's picked so far. Every
single one of them.
Why is that not terrifying to people?
Here he is saying pro Hamas sympathizers. In
other words, as you even see in the
videos, Palestinian supporters.
So the same old game. Pro Hamas, which
by the way, even if you were pro
Hamas, you have a right to think what
you want. You have a right to feel
and say. In fact, the point is if
you wanna say I'm pro Hamas, then I
believe in the worst things they can do.
You have a right to say that. It's
not a crime to say those things. It
would be a crime to do those things.
That's why free speech exists.
Protecting the worst of speech is actual free
speech, not limited speech, which is what you're
all pretending is free speech.
Pro Hamas sympathizers
is a protected stance,
as would be any stance. Pro KKK is
somebody that would well, I can go, yeah.
I think you're gross, but you have a
right to believe that. These are people in
in the coming up in the position of
power who are telling you you're not allowed
to criticize Israel. You're not allowed to boycott
Israel. You're not allowed to have sympathy for
anything we say you're not allowed to have
sympathy for. You can't even stand up and
say fern over to the sea or Palestine,
any of it.
If you're Israeli, you can. I'll show you
that again in a second. But he goes,
aren't they aren't promoting they they're
the pro Hamas sympathizers aren't promoting an end
game of peaceful coexistence, except that's actually
literally what most people in this protest are
calling for. 2 state solution
on the record. And even the ones that
are calling for only Palestine, which, by the
way, is the actual legal reality of this,
even though I too argue that because of
the time that's gone by, it makes more
sense to do a 2 state solution. The
point is even those people are not calling
for murdering all the Israelis if you actually
listen to them,
but these people don't care about that. They
don't care about your right. They don't care
about your opinions. They care about fighting for
a foreign government at your expense.
And he says, this means jihad. Again, misusing
the word to make it sound like terrorism
and the reality simply being most of these
things you're talking about resistance, about revolution.
Right? Just like the word intifada.
American revolution could just as easily be called
the American intifada, which is the reality of
the word, which of course could mean terrible
things, but also could just mean fighting for
your freedom.
That's the truth of these words, and they
just can't stand that people wanna point this
out. But he goes, the end game is
to fill the river to the sea pledge.
Yeah. You know who else says that? The
literal Likud party, which is trip which is
Netanyahu's party, in their own charter,
says, between the river and the sea, there
will only be Israeli sovereignty.
I I pointed this out to Elon Musk
when in 2023, he made the point that
that is that is implying genocide. You're not
allowed to. I said, okay, Elon. Well, here
is Elon Levy saying it 2 days later.
Here is
Eli David saying the same. Nobody cared. Oh,
I see. So it only matters if you're
a Palestinian supporter.
So you're both racist and a and a
hypocrite. Got it. That's the reality, guys. And
so these people don't care about anything other
than what interest Israel's agenda.
Now here
oh, I I I added this after the
fact. This is I I had a Forbes
article that seemed to put up a paywall
all of a sudden. So here's a Fox
News article from 2 days ago saying, here
are the picks so far. If you wanna
look through it, these are the ones they've
generally said publicly announced, which don't forget,
any one of these could end up not
taking place. As I said yesterday, that I
think that's how the RFK train is gonna
go. I personally think that that's gonna be
blamed on the that the democrats won't let
him be confirmed.
Even and again, in my opinion, I just
think that's your government playing the left right
paradigm to can to trip To make you
look at anybody but them.
The point being that they'll make sure he
doesn't get in because I think that won't
be allowed. That's my opinion.
But either way, he's still wildly pro Israel
and go along with the genocide. But either
way, I think what's interesting is that that
every one of these could end up not
taking place, even Elon Musk for that matter.
Well, I guess that I'm not sure advisor
depends on how they frame that position, which
is new. I don't think every single position
needs senate confirmation if I'm remembering correctly. But
either way, it's up in the air is
the point. So let's make sure we remember
that. Even the positive ones, if if the
ones you see as positive.
And I wanted to make that point as
I did yesterday about Thomas Massie. You could
see a lot of Trump supporters out there
acting like Massie's already gonna be part of
the administration even though that is un more
unverified than any of the rest of these.
And Ron Paul, same point. In fact, Ron
Paul, I'll show you in a second, is
already speaking out about the picks. But what's
interesting is for me to call out the
fact that Rubio seemed to have been suggested
and then people stay, you're blindly following x,
y, and z. Well, no. That's been floated.
Now you can see that it's been at
least publicly stated.
And those same people will tell mass tell
you that Massie is a part of the
administration when that's you get my point. Is
it people that wanna ignore facts and lie
in the interest of their agenda right on
the surface of the conversation?
Massey's been clear so far that no one's
tapped him, no one's reached out to him.
He would. He said he'd help if they
asked him, but no one has. I don't
think that'll happen.
Again, Sarah Rose highlighting the picks so far,
which we've already gone over. You can just
look at the list. That's from somebody that's
pro Trump.
Whitney Webb said about Zeldin, the narrative that
Zeldin is a climate change denier isn't actually
true. So now you've got reports coming out
that I think is designed to make you
think that he's on your side.
Because largely, republicans would push back on the
climate change conversation. I think rightly so. The
point is that he's not. He's actually in
line, like everything else in this cabinet, with
the World Economic Forum agenda despite what they're
actually saying. Whether it's pharma biopharmaceutical,
whether it's the biometric wall, whether it's digital
ID, whether it's all I mean, every single
one of these boxes is checked, most by
Elon himself.
But this guy, as she writes,
changed his stance when he joined the Conservative
Climate Caucus not too long ago. To join
a group of congressmen, that group, you have
to subscribe to the official narrative of climate
change. The caucus also works part participates annually
in the UN Climate Change Conferences. Zeldin is
now part of the Bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus,
but I'm sure that will be ignored like
a lot of other things. And Zeldin himself,
remember, he's almost got a $1,000,000
from 29 1990 to 2024 from Israeli funding.
Gerald Celente simply points out here. I'll point
at the end saying the same. Many people
are calling this out. Miriam Adelson is proving
that you $100,000,000,
you can buy a cabinet in the US.
Because that's it's Zionist, Zionist, and Zionist.
Right? And, I mean and to argue that
these are the best people even outside of
that is is embarrassing.
If you really wanted a rebel outsider cabinet,
this is not what it would look like,
guys. These are swamp creatures just like every
other time before it. Now Stefanik,
who they're proudly mentioning in Israel as one
of the leading choices,
she's a race a Zionist race baiting sup
excuse me. Zionist race baiting genocide supporting cartoon
of a person, as I wrote on Twitter.
Like far too many in Trump's orbit. And
now she will be at the United Nations
defending Israel
while they commit genocide. She herself also almost
has oh, actually, I'm sorry. I had this
I just load it looks like this went
back calling me. Grab her name real quick,
and we'll search for you right right on
right on the lives
right on live show. Where is that? Here
we go. Stefanik.
This is a good website to have just
so we can see.
Okay. So hers is 917. Was that really
that close?
Anyway, you can see it says Stefanik right
there.
Almost $1,000,000.
Funny how so much money has come out
just around this last this last
selection. Here she is, in case she missed
the last time, openly telling you why she
is
gonna do whatever Israel needs.
No conditions
stopping you from saying what you may believe.
And even if that simply is pro Palestine
that they pretend is anti semitism. The point
is, being anti semitic as much as it
is disgusting is protected as an inherent right
by your outlined rights by the constitution.
No question, guys. It's very clear.
Here's what she has to say. Today, this
means crushing
anti semitism at home and supplying the state
of Israel with what it needs, when it
needs it without conditions to achieve total victory
in the face of evil.
Okay. So we're talking about her being in
Israel speaking to the Knesset, their congress, and
simply saying, we'll do whatever you need no
matter what. Why is she even there doing
this? Because remember, she just went back again.
So multiple times. And she's not even in
the position yet. This morning, I met with
my good friend, Israeli president Herzog, Isaac Herzog.
You know, the guy who's been caught lying
many, many, many times about atrocity propaganda, about
chemical weapon destruction that turned out to be
a a book from Amazon. And you realize,
I mean, these are flagrantly caught. Everyone, including
corporate media,
were acknowledging that he was lying, and he
knew he was lying.
But who cares though? Right? Because Israel. And
she's simply going, we're gonna do discuss the
need to continue the fight against anti semitism.
You know, a constitutionally protected concept. Or rather
just in any context. You can think what
you want is the point. You can hate
people because of their color. You can hate
people because of their religion. And I can
say you're disgusting, but you have a right
to feel that way. Express those thoughts. That's
what free speech means.
Again, it's so interesting how people right now
put to the
acknowledge that would be the case in any
other context, but when it brings around Israel,
a lot of Republicans will say, no. Not
that, though. That's disgusting. You're not allowed, or
those that's what terrorists do. Whatever. You say
whatever you want. All you're doing is creating
a caveat for what you know is protected
under free speech as disgusting as it may
be.
Here is here she is on 12th. Day
4 zero two. Simply continuing to highlight
the hostages
or predominantly
POWs in is or in Gaza and saying,
including the 7 Americans.
Again, as I said before, not mentioning the
600 plus Americans that are trapped in Gaza.
Because she doesn't care about Americans. She cares
about the Israeli Zionist connection. Because what she's
pointing to are Israeli IDF members that happen
to have American citizenship. The rest of them
are, in some cases, just Americans.
And Palestinian Americans. By the way, it doesn't
really matter. They're all human beings. But she,
as an American representative, is only talking about
the Israeli connection while ignoring Americans that are
trapped.
And, by the way, is still doing so
for day 402, day 404, just over and
over and over and over every day making
this case while ignoring the genocide, while ignoring
the provable examples of rape, of torture,
of you using human shields repeatedly by Israel.
None of that matters because these people are
not out there for the facts. They're being
paid
and whatever else to lie to Americans for
the interest of Israel at American expense. Zachary
Foster simply says, continually emphasizing the plight of
the Israeli hostages while ignoring the plight of
the Palestinian hostages, which is another part of
that. The tens of thousands of hostages that
are kept without charge in Israeli prisons, which
the UN and just about every human rights
group in the world has been talking about
for a decade.
But she simply says doing that is racism.
You are a racist.
That's obvious. She a zionist apartheid mentality is
the epitome of racism. In fact, apartheid is
the worst type of racism, as anybody honest
will tell you, including Israeli academics.
Jason simply highlights the pattern,
which I've already been highlighting, the idea that
every one of them are swamp creatures. I
mean, it's it's the opposite of what we
were promised. Here's Ron Paul saying yesterday
was a bad day for those who endorse
America first in our foreign policy.
Right? So all the people that were out
there saying that he's aligned with the establishment,
he still may help them if they ask.
The point is that he still has the
integrity and the courage, which we all sure
expected
to call out that these picks are not
America First.
Hopefully, everyone else has the same integrity.
Now, RFK pointed out that he has this
public website, which oral Orwell sent me re
earlier, about
putting down what you want,
and I guess people voting on the website.
I really hope this has influence because that
would be pretty cool to see.
Even though that can so obviously be manipulated,
they can hide things. But either way, that's
just the the objective reality of anything we
talk about. But my point is,
when we can we'll be able to very
clearly show so in very short period of
time
whether or not these people's votes actually translate.
Here's the website. Welcome to no nominees for
the people.
There's all these different people on there being
nominated. Here's one,
James Franklin Lee.
And it does say
I mean, ultimately, this just seems to be,
like, the one the the one of the
larger picks with a 112 votes. And here
he is on the of 12th
with RK Junior,
saying I have been nominated for the team
Maha. Please vote for me if you really
want this the to NGO engineering with a
modification. Hell, yeah. I'm glad awesome. I'm glad
he's pointing these things out. Now my point
is simply to highlight that
if this only amounts to people that might
be under RFK Junior, even as we now
have seen recently that the the point is
that that may not be the case in
regard to,
where was that? I thought I had that
saved.
We're basically, here. I can grab it really
quickly. Decentered News put up the clip showing
you that that Howard Lutnick,
in a recent interview, made it very clear
that RFK is not gonna have a position.
They just wants the data, which of course
could be wrong. I mean, he could be
lying, he could be deceived, he could be
misinformed.
So, of course,
there we go. I think it's a good
time to play this one too. It'll take
2 seconds, hold on.
Or I thought it would. Oh, there it
is.
So it matters.
Right? At the very least, that they're that
it's up in the air, it's despite what
people wanna say.
And so my point is that what we're
seeing here is these these choices. Right?
And whether that means that, you know, if
he even gets a position, these people will
sort of be under his under his purview.
But I I'm more I think that we'll
be able to prove that these things don't
translate to the larger vote. That and again,
it were it just makes me feel that
this is about making you think you somehow
have influence over this when at the end
of the day, that's not the case.
But
but I hope I hope it's the opposite,
and that would be great to see if
we can disprove it. And this would be
an easy way to be able to do
so. But here is what Ludnick said about
RFK Junior. Keith, I I think, you know,
that president Trump has promised me is,
is control of the public health agencies, which
are HHS and its sub agencies,
CDC,
FDA, NIH, and a few others, and then
also the,
USDA,
which is,
which,
you know,
is key to making America healthy. My inside
source tonight is the cochair of the Trump
Vance transition team and the CEO of the
investment firm, Kenner Fitzgerald,
Howard Lutnick, RFK junior. He said that Trump
has promised him control of the public health
agencies,
HHS, which would be also, you know, CDC,
FDA,
USDA,
all of these agencies. Is that true? Has
Trump promised him basically the HHS job? So
I spent,
two and a half hours this week with
Bobby Kennedy junior, and it was the most
extraordinary thing. And I said, so tell me,
how's it gonna go? And he said, why
don't you just listen to me explain things?
And what he explained was when he was
born, we had 3 vaccines,
and 1 in 30 getting a job for
HHS. Here's what he said. Cause autism Okay.
Which is what RFK pushes, which is why
people are concerned that he could get a
job like HHS. And I don't even think
he could
getting a job for HHS. People are concerned
that he could get a job like HHS.
And I don't even think he could get
job for HHS. The key that I I
think, you know, that president Trump has promised
me is,
is control of the public health agencies, which
are HHS and its subagencies.
I don't even think I can getting a
job for HHS. What he's trying to do
here's what he wants to do. He said,
I want data.
I just want data. He wants the data
so he can say,
these things are unsafe. All I want is
the data, and I'll take on the data
and show that it's not safe. And then
if you pull the product liability,
the companies will yank these vaccines
right off
off of the market. Remember, Randall But you're
saying he would not be in charge of
HHS? No. Of course not. The key
Does anybody need to be convinced about the
information?
Are you confused about the data? The data
is all public, guys. Now I'm not talking
about the data he may be pointing to.
My point is that would only bolster the
undeniable reality that these things are deadly.
So is Trump gonna do that knowing that
that immediately verifies that he's been lying this
whole time and that he knew he was
lying? Hardly. That seems pretty stupid. But on
top of that, the idea that that the
RFK only wants data, well, he's publicly saying
the opposite.
So I you know, my point is that
either this is some long term ploy to
trick somebody and we'll find out, or we're
all everyone's being played. And I I think
that the problem is that when we get
to the point where it becomes obvious that
this was never gonna happen to ose to
those of us being objective, there are people
that wanna try to act like, my point
about the senate and the democrats. Let's just
say that he doesn't get allowed in because
of the democrats.
Well, the air the narrative will forever be
the democrats stopped it when and and it
in its essence, that is the surface level.
But if you can stand back and recognize
that it's not about left and right and
that's used to trap you and make you
miss the bigger picture of simply your government
continuing the same agenda,
you can recognize that that was why we
pointed out it wasn't ultimately gonna happen. But
it may not even be like that. It
may just be that they don't even give
them the position like Howard's talking about, and
there'll still be some kind of a back
stepping rationalization about why this was always better,
and it'll turn out better in the long
run, trust the plan. It's constant. It's constant.
Oh, at the end of the day, it's
absurd to pretend that this means
look, we should wait until we see what
actually happens. Right now, every indication is going
in the wrong direction as far as I'm
concerned. So we're on Rubio, which is basically
where we got cut off last time. So
now that we know, at least the next
stage of the know, that Trump and this
is the first one. This is from the
12th. Trump expected to tap Marco Rubio, which
got a lot of pushback from the online
Zionist and Trump Trump supporters. Here we are
in 13th. Trump picks former rival, Mark Rubio,
for secretary of state. So as oh, of
course, this is, I don't wanna scroll it
down. Right beneath it, it says and you
can read it. This is something that Trump
has put out. K? So Trump is making
this point, which still doesn't mean it's for
sure. As I've said 14 times, it could
not happen for many different reasons, including that
they could change their mind, Rubio could change
his mind, who knows? But right now, this
is what's happening. So one, it should be
pretty embarrassing for those that have been screaming
this was never even real, that now it
is, at least as the first step.
This shows you how quick people will
try to bolster whatever they think they're supposed
to regardless of the facts when you're trapped
in the partisan mindset.
But let's go over why this is pretty
crazy.
Here he is from the 5th 2015,
saying Sheldon Adelson,
who was, by the way, last time funding
Trump, and now it's Miriam, his he's passed
away. It's now his wife who is continuing
to fund Trump. Same reason we're telling you
that this is or arguing that that is
the reason you're getting a Zionist cabinet. Well,
back in 2015,
he says Adelson's looking to give big dollars
to Rubio because he feels he can mold
him into the perfect little puppet. I agree.
Well, look at that.
Didn't age well. Rich People Weekly says, this
is actually an endorsement if you read it
in proper context.
Exactly. Well, here's Rubio, over $1,000,000 like most
of them seem. It's like a pretty consent
continuous thing
from Israeli funding.
Sam Husseini highlighting that Rubio
and I thought I had a clip further
down here that I wanna jump up now
that I remember how this was lined up.
There it is. Saying that Rubio
is was still lying about the Iraq invasion
in 2016.
At the be at the Republican debate, he
attempted to justify Bush's invading Iraq saying, quote,
no matter what you want to say about
weapons of mass destruction, Hussein, Saddam Hussein, was
in violation of UN resolution resolutions.
Saddam Hussein being the person that they had
supported up until they no longer did.
I mean, think of literally giving them chem
giving them chemical weapons to use against Iran.
And they've even now admitted that today in
different context to point out why they think
Iran might use them in reverse. It's just
crazy how obvious these people are.
So just like Osama bin Laden and the
rest, they're all US allies right up until
the moment they no longer are. We're everything's
a psyop in these conversations, guys. It's very
clear. That doesn't mean everything everywhere. But what
we're talking about, these are all constructs.
He was in violation of UN resolutions. Like
like Israel, like a 100 different times, like
the US, all over the place. It only
applies when you want it to. Oh, but
I thought the UN was Hamas. Right? You
know, same thing for today. But it says,
and the world wouldn't do anything about it.
That's what he's continuing to say in his
quote. But Bush enforced what the international community
refused to do. Yeah. Because they really care
about the international community while they topple countries
and
overthrow presidents and, you know, re really abide
the rules based order as I've been recently
tagging the Israel Israel based international order.
Here's the actual clip of Rubio attempting to
justify
the lies about WMDs.
It says journalist Sam Hussein rebut rebutted Rubio's
UN resolutions claim at the at the time.
Ruben And I say the same conversation, and
he follows it up by saying here's the
shorter version of his, of his clip. I
thought there's another anyway, I thought there was
another thread in there. The point is simply
to continue to show you that this person
is dishonest when it comes to foreign policy,
which shouldn't be that surprising to you. But
the more important points and I'm gonna skip
past this one, just showing Alex Jones kind
of calling him a frat boy and going
back and forth with him, which just seems
almost scripted to me. But he David Knight
is simply going, okay, now, and this is
now even more relevant. Now that he is
being tapped by Trump, what is Alex Jones
gonna do? Is he gonna shift and start
saying that it's 40 chess, go back to
sleep?
Is he gonna does he criticize Trump because
of Rubio?
I doubt it. It says, look to Alex
Jones' lies during the pandemic and stop the
steal to see what he'll do next. Calling
Trump's vaccine sugar water, even though we know
that's not the case because there's an agenda
here.
He says no matter how fake the lies,
MAGA will always excuse Trump and Alex Jones.
Sadly, that seems to be the case. The
point is
that what he has been saying this one
is simply showing you who's got an Israeli
flag outside of his office as of right
now.
But here's 2 minutes of him denouncing Trump
as a con artist. Now these are the
ones that should stand out. Now when we
have Vance,
going back saying the same thing up until
he was tapped by Thiel to be Trump's
sidekick, or
Dabbard,
or RFK Junior, or damn near everybody in
his orbit at one point before was saying
how dumb he was, what a con artist
he was. No. Maybe that's all a big
ploy. Maybe he's the smartest guy in the
room. I you could decide for yourself. The
point is that this should be alarming to
you if there's nothing that where we're at
now just as on a dime, now we're
on the same side. It should either show
you that all of this is a big
show and that they're just going in whatever
is they're paid to do, whatever is in
their personal interest.
I can't even think, like or they're just
lying to you. I the point is it's
such an obvious deception that they're lying on
one side of this. Right? They both can't
be true in the same conversation. So one
of this is one side's a lie. You
could depict which one it is. That shouldn't
make you feel good either way.
There is no way we are going to
allow a con artist to take over the
conservative movement, and Donald Trump is a con
artist. Donald Trump is a con artist.
He's a con man. I think it's time
to unmask
for what he is. A con man who's
taking advantage of people's fears and anxieties about
the future, portraying himself as some sort of
strong guy. He's not a strong guy. He
doesn't sweat. He doesn't sweat because his supporters
are clogged and his brain can't even
You all have friends that are thinking about
voting for Donald Trump. Friends, do not let
friends vote for con artists.
We're about to turn over the conservative movement
to a person that has no ideas of
any substance on the important issues, the nuclear
codes of the United States to an erratic
individual. So we cannot allow the conservative movement
to be taken over by a con artist.
How can the nominee of the Republican Party,
of the party of Lincoln, the party of
Reagan,
the party of hope, and the party of
optimism,
nominate someone who refuses to criticize the Ku
Klux Klan or distance himself from an avowed
racist like David Duke. At the party of
Lincoln and Reagan and the presidency of the
United States will never be held by a
con artist. Guys, we have a con artist
as the front runner in the Republican Party.
A guy a guy who has made a
career out of telling people lies He's always
taught me little Marco. And I don't think
that he's taller than he's like 62, which
is why I don't understand why his hands
are the size of someone to fight to.
Have you seen his hands?
They're like this.
And you know what they say about men
with a small hands?
You can't trust them. You can't trust them.
You can't trust them.
Well, that's pretty clear. Of course, the argument,
well, he was
running against him. Okay. So you're you're willing
to admit that they lied to you when
they're running for cat for for Kansas? Okay.
Well, then it applies to Trump.
No. He's not, though. Okay. Funny how that
works. Alright. If the game is that you're
okay to you're willing to overlook blatant dishonesty
and attacks
against somebody who they later wanna work with
because they want to win,
I mean, is it you that means you
don't care about people's integrity.
It's the same thing I make about Trump
and the vaccine. Like, you if you're gonna
try to pretend that it's 40 chess and
that he's doing this to trick them or
to to expose the bigger picture, even if
you think that in the long run, it'll
save more lives, the point you're making is
that he's willing to tell women and children
that this will be good for them, to
risk their lives, to kill to potentially kill
that child now for his political benefit, even
if you think that political benefit will be
gain everybody in the future.
How is that something you're morally okay with?
He has been saying for years now that
that thing is the right thing to do,
the safe thing.
That what doesn't hurt you. Right? I mean,
I I mean, do I even need to
play it? I'm wondering if there's people that
still don't know that, which I think is
crazy.
Said I'll I'll grab it really quickly if
you haven't seen it.
This is this is interviewing with Candace Owens.
Some people have died under COVID this year,
by the way, under Joe Biden Right. Than
under you. And more people took the vaccine
this year. So people are questioning how I
don't know the vaccine work, but Yeah. Some
people So right there, she was trying to
set him up to be able to give
it to be honest.
Her what the setup she gave was to
say, see the vaccine turning people, but they're
the ones getting it more. And he went
right into the spiel, and she doesn't push
back. Well, I'll tell you, the ones the
ones that get very sick and go to
the hospital and the ones that don't take
their vaccine Fake. But it Fake news. It's
still their choice.
And if you take Hardly. The vaccine, you're
protected. Fake news. Look. The results of the
vaccine are very good. And if you Right?
You are fake news. Right? Doing this whole
thing. The point is obviously we know I
think we know that he knows that's not
true. That's that's I how is that not
a red line? I just don't get that.
So here is another example.
Just these are just more clips of him
saying the same thing. The stakes are giving
control of the party of Lincoln and Reagan,
of the conservative movement, and ultimately of the
United States over to a con artist. That
will not happen. I make this promise to
you today. I will do whatever it takes.
I will campaign as long as it takes.
I will stay in this race as Except
until we wanna join teams, though. Okay? Long
as it takes.
Donald Trump
As long as it takes to to gain
me a political benefit.
A con artist will never get control of
this party.
They'll say whatever they want they think you
want to hear, guys.
And the time has come for you. I
know some of your friends have bought into
this. Listen, friends. Don't let friends vote for
con artist. Say you get the point. The
the obvious reality, guys, is this is what
politics is. We should all know this by
now. These are career politicians. That's why in
the beginning of this con like, going back
to the origins of this country, that's not
how it was. Politician being a politician was
a public service. You had a job, and
you did this on top of that. Today,
these people are grifters that are working off
the back of your money, acting like they're
helping everybody. These are the villain. These are
the criminals. This is the point about the
larger criminal organization of what this government is.
Here is Donald Trump, in many ways,
saying this is 10 nasty things that Trump
said about Marco Rubio. These are all tweets.
By the way, I'm willing to bet you
most of which you won't be able to
find searching his Twitter account because Twitter seems
to be
effectively hiding things like this on the platform.
But little Marco Rubio, the lightweight with no
show senator from Florida is said to be
the puppet of the special interest Koch brothers.
But he'll work but but now we'll tag
team work together. Marco Rubio is a total
lightweight who I wouldn't hire to run one
of my smaller companies. But, yeah, you work
with him now and he'll let him run
the country. Right? Lightweight
lightweight
lightweight choker, Marco Rubio looks like a little
boy on stage
and just so just so petty and small.
Like, these people are in, like, a high
school level mindset. Rubio is totally owned by
the lobbyists. Well, you all are, it seems?
Marco Rubio should pick a location that has
working air conditioning next time, especially when in
Miami, proper plan. This is just random things.
This is so funny.
Why would anyone in Florida says vote for
lightweight senator Marco Rubio? Check out his credit
card scam, his house sale, and his no
show voting. I will be using Facebook and
Twitter to expose dishonest lightweight senator Marco Rubio.
A record no show in senate. He's scamming
Florida.
It's just it's it's crazy to me, guys.
This is it's amazing that people can overlook
this stuff.
Here's Greg Reese,
who again, I does he still you tell
me in the chat. Does he still work
with info wars? I I if he does,
I find it interesting seeing as how there's
quite a different of opinion here, difference of
opinion. He says your trusted MAGA alt media
sources have been bought and paid for by
APAC.
Now, by the way, that you know, if
that is the case, it's it I I
mean, I've heard this in the past from
plenty of the people that work. The idea
that whether or not you're
told you have to cover whatever else, the
point is at the end of the day,
what you're seeing from the primary coverage from
Alex in particular is overlooking all of this.
Talking about globalism, ignoring the obvious Israeli
focus in all of that conversation.
Either way,
what he's been putting out recently about this.
Again, the the point should be from my
perspective as you guys should know by now.
I don't it doesn't matter who's pointing it
out. Like, again, later in the show, I'll
make a point about the Alex Jones bankruptcy
thing in regard to why either way, whatever
he is, even if you think he's lying
to you every day, it's still the argument
is I think he's being politically
and it what they're doing is wrong.
Period. But we'll come to that in a
second. This point is about the idea that
be just because he's connected to Infowars. I
don't the point is I agree with this.
Your trust your trusted MAGA influencers are bought
by APAC. And Harry simply says, how is
this guy working in the US government and
now secretary of state? Now these are all
the points I shared the other day just
about
he this is Marco Rubio posting gospel
about Israel.
This one says, you are my servant. In
you, Israel, I show my glory.
It's an American politician. It just seems like
a very weird thing. But now, you know,
obviously, I hope you're beginning to see why
these things are more concerning than you think.
Now here is Decentral News pointing out Marco
Rubio
speaking with,
Medea Benjamin saying, it isn't
It,
hasn't been confirmed yet, but now but now
at least has been that they
made this case and have to wait for
center confirmation. But it's saying, here's Rubio blaming
Hamas 100%
for the countless thousands of civilians massacred by
Israel, which we now know as a matter
of fact. Even Israel's military debated that and
their media. Hannibal directive.
So he doesn't care about the facts. He
cares about what Israel wants him to care
about. That's what we're talking about. 100%.
That's a lie. Also, claiming that Iran is
the sole source of instability and violence in
the region. Really?
Again, it it just it's these are these
are political narrative talking points, completely devoid of
fact.
This is where on the side of Israel,
the good guys. Right. While they're committing genocide,
you can say something like that. Wild.
Now Fetterman, of course, the other completely Israeli
blind Zionist promoter, hails Rubio as the strong
choice for secretary of state. Again,
kinda same conversation of,
of, Andrew Tate.
Kinda I I I I'd be like, dang
it. If Fetterman's saying I'm good, then that
makes me look bad. Fetterman's an idiot. And
it's saying says he will vote to confirm
him.
And here's Mossad commentary,
posting this on 11th. Okay. Please reflect on
this. And I have 2 other points showing
you this.
Israel,
apparently, knew on 11th.
America, your new secretary of state. Congratulations, Mark
Rubio. That's the Assad commentary.
Okay. Well, realizing that
2 days later is when he first got
the official nod from Trump.
So can we please acknowledge that Israel seems
to know who's being chosen by Trump before
the American people do and why that is
so alarming?
I'm sure these kind of points will get
mixed, you know, skipped over.
Okay. Let's talk about Mike Huckabee. This is
one of the most alarming because of his,
like, religious
blind prophetic support for Israel.
Trump nominates Mike Huckabee for US ambassador to
Israel.
Again, here is Mike Huckabee.
Oh, this oh, this one was,
hold on. See, I think these things are
refreshing on me.
Oh, you know what? I remember what it
was now. He's not he's a that's right.
I was this was there for me checking
from before. In any case oh, wait. Did
I just close that?
Okay. Good. I did.
Incoming ambassador to to Israel, Mike Huckabee says
West Bank annexation,
of course, a possibility. Like, this is so
crazy to me because you have to realize
that the only person who even barely deviated
from the reality that this is objectively illegal
was Mike Pompeo. And he didn't even say
it. Well, he just said it was
it wasn't inconsistent with the law. Like, it's
just such a cool a lazy sidestep.
Everybody in this conversation, including the United States,
is acknowledging the annexation of the West Bank
is illegal.
Not only because it's agreed to that it
would be Palestinian territory in many different agreements
in the past by Israel. So even and
and no matter whether you wanna blame Hamas
for why it didn't happen or not, you
agreed and you still are taking it. It's
just so it shows you that they have
no regard for anything.
And and they feel very empowered by the
fact that so far, the US has not
only not done anything, but they tell they
just ignore it. They praise them for it.
So in their own in the minds of
a lot of the Zionist supporters, it's the
best that they're they're they that's why they
show it so clearly. Look at how much
we can control the US government.
As Republicans, that should scare you.
But West Bank annexation, which is what Miriam
Adelson is paying Trump primarily for, is a
crime
objectively from everybody's perspective. And he's going, yeah.
Do it. Good. That's probably gonna happen.
Here he is saying
pretty alarming things about the end times. And
he says, Trump has installed Mike Huckabee as
US ambassador to Israel. Huckabee, currently an evangelical
Christian preacher and broadcaster,
subscribes to end times theology and proclaims Israel
a fulfillment of biblical prophecy.
This is not a joke.
This guy is in a pow a position
of power in these in the in the
incoming or is about to be in the
incoming Trump administration.
So for 44 years, I've been coming to
Israel, and I've seen God take this country
and do amazing things here. And, really, the
only explanation for Israel, I tell people when
I bring them here and they've never been
before,
I I tell them I said, you know,
if this is your first time, you you
have no context. But let me say to
you, this is a fulfillment of prophecy. Yes.
Ezekiel 37, the dry bones. So so the
genocide and the illegal occupation objectively by international
law is the fulfillment of prophecy. So all
you wanna see, even at that one point,
ignoring the egregious
rape and torture and imprisonment, apartheid and everything
else, just the idea that you wanna argue
that this is fulfilling prophecy and you can
objectively prove that the origin point of occupation
is illegal, What that shows you is from
a willingness of politicians and people in power
to ignore facts, logic, the law if they
believe they're in the right biblical lane,
if they believe that this is fulfillment to
prophecy. This is my concern about overlapping religion
with journalism in general, Let alone in a
position of political power. Because you're because you're
being guided by your belief in something that
we can't verify, we can't that is a
religious belief. And you're gonna be ignoring international
law, letting people be murdered because you believe
they're in the right when it comes to
god.
It is actually one of the most alarming
things in this conversation because the people like
Ben Gavir and Smotrich
are screaming that Trump is a prophet, that
this is the end times, that what we're
gonna do and realize what they mean by
that is the destruction of the west, which
brings this is what they know.
This is what you can look up when
it's on the record. As I played recently,
the conversations of the weaponized migration from Adam
from, from Adam. No more news.
The these rabbis are saying that this needs
to happen, that the the flooding of the
migration into Europe and the United States is
part of what will bring us end So
we can't even factor in that that might
be engineered.
Like, I don't know, literally engineering a red
calf.
Because you realize the whole point is that
was supposed to be godsent.
That it randomly, a red calf is except
what they did was genetically engineer a calf
to look red.
Because Zionism is a ploy. It is using
these beliefs. And many of them, I think,
there's an overlap of people that have bought
into their own narrative. But either way, this
is an American politician who is talking about
that.
And if they believe that that means the
end of you to create
that, why would you support that? Maybe because
you're not acting in American interests.
Fulfillment of prophecy. Yes. I I tell him,
I said, you know, if this is your
first time, you you have no context. But
let me say to you,
this is a fulfillment of prophecy. Yes. Ezekiel
37. The dry bones live again.
And the dead Let's also make sure we're
very clear about the fact that the term
Israel in the bible is not Israel today.
That is why they chose that word because
there was biblical reference. These are Zionists who
simply chose to take somebody else's territory because
the UK let them,
and they just named it something that they
knew would be this is the whole reason
why this agenda makes the the the idea
that Christians were the original point and that
today there's more Christian Zionist than than Jewish,
that Herzl was an atheist. You can look
at his conversations. His own journal points out
how he was wildly anti Semitic.
Or rather the right term just being hated
Jews because semites
is manipulation in its own right.
But think about how concerning all of this
is, the overlap to that, and how we
can watch these people driving forward something that
is bringing that on.
Desert is blooming right before our eyes. The
desert is blooming here, and the only explanation
for the extraordinary
explosion economically
and even
Theft, occupation.
Agriculturally.
Ethnic cleansing, colonization. Of this land is that
god has his hand on it. Of course.
Right? Because god wants them to ethnically cleanse
population. They want them to steal, rape, and
purr and murder and then brag about it
on Instagram. Right? That's what that's what god
wants. Right? Well, if that's what god wants,
then me believe in something quite different.
You know? The this is what the and
do you think maybe he doesn't even know
any of this stuff? Maybe somebody who doesn't
know any of this stuff or lies about
it shouldn't be an ambassador for Israel.
What happens next?
It's about the end times. And quite frankly,
some of us think we may just be
living them.
So, Max Lucado, so good to see you.
Thanks for joining us, and welcome as we
talk about the end of the world.
Well, governor, I wouldn't be anywhere else. I'm
supremely honored to have these moments with you.
And, yes, I do believe we're not just
in the end times.
We're in the end of the end times.
It's moving fast. Like, can we not realize
that even if you agree with that, what
that means, the your actions
driven by I mean, it's the here's a
good overlap
for Republicans. You know how crazy it is
to watch these some of these liberals freak
out about how climate change is gonna end
the world in 3 weeks or a year,
and so we have to take drastic action
that might hurt people now, but it's because
we have to save us from the long
that's pretty scary, isn't it? People that can
rationalize
drastic and extreme actions based on a lie
because they believe we're gonna die very soon
because they've been tricked by the larger agenda.
Well, guess what? We're talking about people that
are making arguments about the that we're the
end of the end times.
So if you think the world's gonna end
soon and that none of the law
you act differently.
And you realize this is not just the
ambassador.
This is everybody Trump has picked so far
in his cabinet from the top down.
Max, when you say that, it scares a
lot of people. They think, oh, no. The
end of the world. That that's just terrible.
Your whole book Now I think, oh, no.
They believe this. Book is focused on quite
a different perspective about the end times. You
say in this book, it's not something that
we ought to be afraid of. It's something
we ought to embrace and look forward to.
So how does a person look forward to
the end of the world? I am so
excited about the end of the world. I
really am. Every time I read more passages
about what God has in store for his
children,
the plans that he has,
the way he has proven his authority over
the world,
that day in which the devil will be
ultimately
forever
defeated and cast into a bottomless pit.
I don't think we need to be be
afraid. We often say don't be scared, but
just
be prepared.
You know how long people in these positions,
many of which probably believe it, have been
saying this? You know how many different examples
we have of people in positions of religious
power saying that the end times are next
month, next year, predictions left and right, and
usually get people to take certain action. Could
be dishonest. Could be they believed it. Either
way,
here we are again. And Israel
is making this happen. Judge Napoleano says, here's
your new US ambassador to Israel.
No such thing as Palestine.
2 state solution is irrational and unworkable. These
are all things he said. There's plenty of
land in the world for Palestine. No such
thing as the West Bank. There's no such
thing as a settlement. There's no such thing
as an occupation.
Think about how crazy that is. I mean,
there really is not such thing as I
I have to be careful in saying this.
Oh, these people, it was really good. There's
no such thing as a Palestinian. Yeah.
There's no such thing as a Palestinian. Of
Arabs and Persians. You know?
It is such complex even than that. Right.
There's we know some things. Transfer. That that's
been a political tool to try to force
land away,
from Israel. Wow. The 2 state solution, if
we mean 2 governments holding the same piece
of real estate,
is irrational and on No. That's not what
it means, bud. And I think your damn
will know that. It talks about the the
the differentiation
between different territories, which means giving back some
of the land to Palestine. The problem is
that he doesn't want to acknowledge that because
Israel will never ever ever ever allow that,
and that's why they've surreptitiously stopped it from
happening by lying to people in the country,
especially Americans.
Far back as you wanna look, they have
been funding Hamas in order to keep that
from happening and many other examples of doing
so. It's public knowledge today if you care
to know the truth. It's been cited by
Horetz, by the United Nations. It's obvious information.
The former prime minister and head of Shin
Bet are on the record saying they gave
him $1,400,000,000
in order to keep them divided. It's all
right on the record. So the point is
that this is him trying to deny the
reality of what the international law states, but
even even beyond that, that even within that,
you could have some kind of agreement that,
by the way, Israel has already agreed to
more than once.
And yet here's an American
making things up about it, and maybe he
just doesn't know any better. Workable. If there
is a two state solution,
the Palestinian
state needs to be outside the boundaries
of the nation of Israel. You know the
entire premise of it is that Israel is
occupying Palestinian land, which is the legal reality
objectively by the inter by you international law
going back as far far as you wanna
look. And the argument that they should be
the ones that have to move after a
genocide has been committed against them for 3
times in a
it it's it is not just insulting. It
is unnerving that anybody can stand there with
a straight face and make these arguments unless
they're being funded for it. There's plenty of
land in the world. I guess I should
I said that wrong because it's still unnerving,
but what is that's why it's happening. That
we could find a place and say, okay.
Let's let's create a Palestinian
state. Oh, yeah. Where's that gonna be? Are
we pretending there's some unoccupied land out there
that they can just take and make theirs?
Well, no. Now you're acting like Israel. You're
gonna take somebody's pretend like you made it
bloom. No. They didn't bloom. It was an
existing civilization that was flourishing until you came
in and committed genocide,
which, again, people are finally beginning to acknowledge
or have the courage to point out. There
are certain words I refuse to use. The
there is no such thing as a West
Bank. It's Judea and Samaria. No. No. That's
the that's the words Israel just like everything
else. You realize Israel has already made up
new words for Southern Lebanon that they're planning
on taking? They've literally made up new Hebrew
words for where their settlements are gonna go.
But but the narrative we haven't gotten there
yet. The narrative from the US government, they're
lying about it, is they're just trying to
fight back the bad guys. Explain for me
why then there's an inner there's an internal
discussion, having conferences about where their settlements will
go in Gaza, in Lebanon. And we've already
seen Gaza where they're saying, guess what? Now
you can't come back. And they even admitted
yesterday, a general on the record said the
plan was always to take Northern Gaza.
All of it is out there. People like
this either don't know, which is equally scary,
or they're lying to you for a foreign
government. Mhmm. There's no such thing as a
settlement. Their communities, their neighborhoods, their cities.
You realize the actual origin of Zionism
calls themselves a colonial center project, a colonial
a settler colonialism project.
On the record,
again, if he doesn't know that, that's pretty
damn embarrassing. But most likely, he's being paid
less. There's no such thing as an occupation.
How can you possibly say that? Yeah. There's
a legal definition for occupation, but I guess
we just pretend words don't exist for Israel.
Governor Huckabee says, if Islam is a peaceful
is as peaceful as they claim, who's they?
Islam? Is there one person called Islam? Are
we talking about a nebulous concept that's multifaceted
around the world? But, see, they love to
make it this simple for you. Right? How
it's just like it's like saying if if
Christians are as peaceful as they or rather
if Christianity
is as peaceful as they claim, shouldn't they
be begging us to come listen to their
sermons over and and convert?
Well, of course, I could point to
sermons being conducted by KKK, who claim to
be Christians, or any kind of radical Christian
elements that I could point to that are
pretty scary. They exist all over the country.
We don't like to talk about that though.
But my point is, you can obviously highlight
first of all, Islam is a wildly broad
topic. This is the kind this is the
kind of Laurel Loomer stupidity that we see
all over people that are blinded by Israel.
The idea that you can just pretend that
people are inherently bad because of their religion.
I could point to Zionists that don't recognize
they're part of an ethnic cleansing, a genocidal
mindset because they don't know that.
My point is simply to highlight that just
because of those things is not the idea
is about action. And I can point to
a an endless amount of information showing you
people all around the world that are peaceful
Muslims,
communities, societies, but they are desperate
for Israel's agenda and through a lot of
people in this country convincing you that they're
inherently bad.
How I mean, how fast we got back
to the point where you're now apparently allowed
to broad stroke an entire group of people
because Israel says.
It's pretty incredible.
But here he is telling you that. He's
this is a person who's gonna be an
ambassador to Israel openly claiming that Islam in
and of itself is a bad thing.
I could prove to you all of them
can be bad things in every possible way
if controlled or manipulated by other people.
Here's Dan Cohen highlighting Trump's pick for ambassador,
was photographed, chumming it up with an Israeli
who wrote Dan Cohen a message threatening to
lynch him in the town square.
Zion is he says Zionism is the highest
level of antisemitism.
It's important to realize what he means by
that, which we showed you earlier. The the
very clear discussion we had and the reality
that this is Zionism using
antisemitism
and Judaism to protect itself, which a lot
of Jews are beginning to call out.
It says, just came across this death threat
from a fascist Israeli photographer, Sharon Gabe in
my Facebook messages. Gabe's photos have been displayed
on the Knesset, and he's he's close with,
Mike Huckabee
and other
people in this in the candidate to government
positions. The point is that these kind of
people sidle up next to the most radical
elements of Israeli's government while casting out accusations
against broad concepts because
they're you know, whatever you think is driving
it, illegitimately
so.
Shouldn't we be able to recognize that these
people are acting
I mean, how I mean, you don't have
to call it a genocide if you don't
want. It's what it is. But are we
really trying to pretend? Like, how is that
not a red line in and of itself?
We all see what's happening. Children are being
bombed and destroyed and exploded all over the
place.
Starvation,
rape,
torture. All of these things have been proven.
Even human shields on Israel's side.
And yet, we can't acknowledge that that's somehow
a problem?
This is a system systemic problem
in their government, and people like this are
happy to support it, which needs to either
show you that they're that
uninformed,
willfully ignorant, blind to it, or are okay
with it and are lying to you for
another reason.
Here's an ongoing clip that I'll just include
for or rather a thread from Laura Friedman
showing you all the different things he said.
Many of these clips we already showed you.
There is no such thing as Palestine. Palestinian
state is a fantasy.
So real so here he is over here
saying, we just need to move it somewhere
else. Well, before he said it was a
fantasy in general.
Narrative shifting.
US should fund building in Judea and Samaria.
So now you we should fund an objectively
illegal thing.
Considers buying a home. He's he he even
wants to buy a home in the West
Bank. Declares West Bank to be part of
Israel.
It's just so objectively obvious. Now let's talk
about Pete Hegseth, because this one's even more
alarming. Or I guess equally so with the
kind of rabid pro Israel mindset.
This is an article from the 12th simply
saying Trump picks Pete had sec had Hegseth,
a Fox News host. A literal host of
the Fox News of a Fox News show
for defense secretary.
I mean, guys, let's be cool. Look. I'm
the 1st to say that just because somebody's
in a political position, it doesn't mean they're
the best for the job. So, hey, maybe
he is the maybe he'll turn out to
be the best defense secretary ever, assuming pretending
we even need a state. The point is
that this is crazy to think that this
person will have more like, I would pick
somebody outside if that was happened in this
position, outside of these Washington circles, but I
would like somebody who, you know, maybe knows
more than the narrative around Iran or understands
the reality
of the Israel Palestine dynamic.
That's not this person. This is a rabidly
pro Israel person as we'll show you.
Here's Vanessa Bailey saying this his comparison
of Zionism,
the way he frames it is absurd. Let's
watch it first.
Thought I had that.
I was almost certain I had that. I'll
make sure I didn't miss these.
Yeah. There it is. Anyone that wants to
take the stage
and talk about dual loyalty
is dead wrong.
What this What does that even mean?
So dual loyalty doesn't exist?
Like, it it almost it almost makes me
it almost it always makes me laugh how
people like Trump, for example,
try to are are clearly being driven by
something. You can tell by the way they
make the point and they make it in
such a clumsy fashion.
Of course, dual loyalty
exists. People can have dual citizenship and then
be conflicted about which that's what that means.
Of of course, it's okay to point it
out when it's Russia or China, but the
only weird anomaly pops up when we start
acknowledging that Israel isn't that conversation. No. That's
fake news. You're racist.
Hold on.
Oh, that was weird. The Twitter page started
playing all of a sudden.
So that weirded me out. I was worried
we just lost connection again. So the point
simply,
I just lost my train of thought there.
Shoot. Start it over. Page.
And talk about the Right. Just do a
loyalty just to finish my point, which obviously
the point is that this is an objective
thing. It's it's it's a clearly a fact.
You can have dual citizenship
and point out that that could conflict when
it comes to political position, which is the
argument that people shouldn't have dual citizenship when
they're in a position of political power.
At least we should have that conversation, but
we're able to have that in any other
context.
Because, really, there is no other example where
you have somebody in the Chinese military, let's
say, in the US government. Or let's just
take an ally, somebody from the British government
in the US government. But weirdly enough, it's
totally weird. Pretend it's normal to have Brian
Mast show up in his IDF uniform or
to have somebody in in New York get
elected to a position who's an ex IDF
member.
It just happened. These things are crazy to
me, especially when we realize in some cases,
we're talking about not an American who also
has dual citizenship, but an Israeli who happens
to have American citizenship. And that does make
a difference. Either way, we're talking about an
a person who has another
another loyalty
to a foreign government.
The only time that becomes a problem is
when you make it about Israel. That has
to highlight the point for you. So the
weird thing is he starts out saying, anyone
who wants to talk about that is wrong.
It's a weird way to say that because
talking about it does not make a point.
But he's just simply saying you're not allowed
to. That's how you should read it. Fool
loyalty
is dead wrong.
What this organization
represents, what western civilization
represents today
is under in understanding
that Zionism
and Americanism
are the front lines of western civilization and
freedom in our world today. Wow.
Quite the stretch. Now let's be let's first
point out how stupid it is to Americanism.
What is that? What are we talking? We're
talking about Zionism, which is like saying a
republican. It's a political organization.
It is an ideology, that's for sure. So
you could say republicanism or whatever you wanna
call it. The point is simply that Americanism
is just a I I mean, I'm sure
there is something about, like, the American
project or how we're trying to conflate those
things. And what is so crazy about that
is that it's it's like Stefanik trying to
say that this is like George Washington's America
and then we're gonna and that's the overlap
with Israel.
These are they're so desperately trying to tap
into the the America first constitutional
Republican mindset and make you think these things
are the same. We're literally talking about something
that could not be more the opposite of
what you're fighting for. An authoritarian,
apartheid state that is willing to tack do
I mean, nothing matters.
Not least of which is your rights. I
mean, look at what's happened to Israelis who
protest Israel. They're getting beat up. They're getting
arrested. Teachers are getting put in jail. People
are moving from their positions because they simply
post something online. That's happening in Israel. You're
all happy to call that out in the
UK, but weird how you just ignore it
when it happens to people in Israel. This
is alarming because Zionism is objectively a bad
thing.
We could in regard to the ideology and
what they've carried out in its name. And
the proof being what people have
academics to talk about it, the history of
what they've done, the documents from the United
Nations.
And thirdly, to point out that they're even
closely the same thing. We're talking about something
that is a political ideology that's driven ethnic
cleansing and genocide for the last so many
100 years, whereas America is a country where
you can talk about a lot of different
perceptions and ideologies that work through this. He
is just trying to make you think, is
Zionism
is America?
Why? Because they're so desperately losing control, and
that's, I think, a last effort to do
so.
And and what better time for that relationship
from the scrapping of the terrible Iran deal
to the embassy move, the recognition of Scrapping
of the deal. In other words, Trump violating
the deal and pretending like they broke the
deal until that became so obvious. They just
go, okay. Never mind. Grab it.
Oops. Jerusalem
as the capital of the Jewish state and
the recognition of the gold It's not the
Jewish state, it is the state of Israel
and that's the ploy. Plenty of Jews do
not recognize that as they even the star
of David is an is it is Zionist
symbol. It is not a symbol of Judaism.
The actual Torah or the, what's it called?
The little,
blank on the term. The point is you
can ask Jews about this.
Either way, it's all about narrative control. Golan
Heights.
So we mentioned the Golan Heights and Jerusalem,
both of which are objectively illegal.
They Trump had no authority to do either
of those things as anybody in the u
international law will point out. This president is
a true friend of the state of Israel.
It is an eternal bond,
an unbreakable
bond. They always say the same things. Eternal,
unbreakable for a 1000 years.
These are different meanings, especially with the prophetic
overlap we're talking about.
Nothing should be an unbreakable bond. What if
they murder your president?
That is that un so it's no conditions?
Not unbreakable? Eternal?
Well, no. There should be lines. If you
know, one of them probably being committed genocide.
That represents faith and freedom and fidelity to
historic
religious
and and cultural traditions. The opposite He he
checks notes. Get the right words. Sid,
of secularism
and Islamism and antisemitism.
Wow.
I I don't wanna be Jeb Bush, but
it's okay to clap.
Just kidding.
Zionism
is racism.
Israel cannot be both. Israel is either
a racist Jewish state or it's a democratic
state for everybody, and that's what I would
like Israel to be. I'd like
a democratic solution, one state with equal rights
for,
all its inhabitants.
Your organization Human Rights Watch issued
a report last year,
about
Israel,
and the conclusion was it is an apartheid
state.
And the 4 major
human rights groups in the last 2 years
who issued similar reports
reached the same conclusion,
Israel is an apartheid state. So
apartheid
is racism.
Apartheid
is discrimination.
But
Israel is the only member
of the United Nations that I know
which is officially racist,
And I say this
because of the,
July
2018
nation state law, which says That's right. The
Jews
have a unique
unique right to self determination
in Israel.
Unique means exclusive. Yes. It means Arabs have
no right to serve the termination. Mhmm. It
means even if Arabs became a majority Mhmm.
They would still have no right to serve
the termination. Mhmm. So most certainly,
Zionism
is a,
is a racist ideology,
and it is largely responsible
for the Anakba
that has unfolded throughout the last century and
continues today.
Now, the the reason the reason that
that law was created and this is on
the record is because they were worried that
they would lose that majority.
And they wanted to make sure that the
Zionist control was always there. So it's not
a democracy.
Even, again, back to the point of whether
we should even want that. It's just so
blatant how they're constantly playing these games with
everything you pretend to care about.
Now as we as, Vanessa says, this is
absurd. Americanism and Zionism are two hands of
global terrorism.
100%. Now, really, I should argue, I would
say the US government.
I I honestly, I'm not even sure what
Americanism truly means in this context. I think
that's part of the ploy. But just in
case you understand it understand you wanna know
why I mean, to clarify my opinion,
the US government is the problem in this.
Americans,
just like the Israelis and Zionism,
it's the same point. Plenty of Israelis can
see through it.
Most of them seem to get played by
it, and I think the same thing happens
in this country. I'm hoping that it's becoming
more of a minority.
But either way, I agree. The US government
and and Zionism are two hands of the
global terrorist agenda.
Now here again is the interview with Dan
Cohen.
And here's a conversation I had a while
back, and this is on February 24, 2024.
Zionism versus Nazism,
Israel's connection to extremist ideology, and ADL's history
of faking Nazi marches. Now even then, which
is all this is very easy to prove.
Public information,
super contentious.
Hopefully, even more less hopefully, less so now
as we get more and more aware of
the reality.
It's not that Israelis or Jewish people are
the problem. It's that Zionism,
as you can prove, literally aligned itself with
Nazi Germany during and after the final solution.
That that's that's public information, and yet we
pretend that they created the state to fight
against the thing they were aligning themselves with.
And you can look this up on Wikipedia
for crying out loud. Dan Cohen has covered
this himself.
As well as the fact that Israel's connection
to extremist ideology goes back a long way,
and ADL has been caught faking Nazi marches
in the past. It's all covered in this
show. It's very clear.
And it get, you know, get, like, like,
Ari with comments, which I think I you
know, I always always suspect people for trying
to convince others the in misinformation. The point
is simple.
Zionism
is manipulation of these ideas. That's why there
are more Christian Zionist today. So if you
wanna make it only about Jewish supremacy, then
you're missing the point or you're trying to
misinform people in the chat.
There are people that are in this conversation
that are Jewish supremacists. For example,
like, Bethsala, the leading human rights group in
Israel, makes it clear. A Jewish a regime
of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to
the Mediterranean Sea. So we're talking about right
there is the Israeli
example of Zionism. But since we can prove
that Herzl was an atheist and that as
even Dan points out, it was actually Christians
in the origin point, and then even today,
there are more Christian Zionists than there are
Jewish Zionists, then we can't. Let's stop falling
for these manipulators. Okay? The truth is that,
obviously, there is Jewish supremacy just like there's
supremacy in any conversation that's being led by
Zionism.
But that doesn't make it about Jewish people.
It makes it about Zionism.
They overlaps, obviously.
But if you only wanna pick you know,
pigeonhole it in one thing, I think that's
an agenda for showing itself.
Now Daniel McAdams makes the point about Pete
himself, saying, this guy is more insane than
you can even imagine.
There's a clip.
This is him this is what Tracy,
Michael Tracy shared.
He says, if you open up your bible,
you can find that god granted Abraham the
land of Israel.
Right? So, again, you can have religious beliefs,
but if that's guiding your policy, if that's
guiding your actions and guiding you to ignore
genocide because you think god said this is
okay, that's a terrifying thing to see.
If you open up your bible,
god granted Abraham this land. The 12 tribes
of Israel established the constant constitutional monarchy a
1000 BC. King David was their 2nd king
and established Jerusalem as the capital.
Jews were were fighting foreign
occupiers
for centuries,
ultimately maintaining a presence there. But the key
the key aspect and and right now,
Palestinians,
Arabs, Muslims are trying to erase the Jewish
ties to Jerusalem as we speak. I've I've
been there multiple times. They're trying to make
it look like Jews were never there. The
most important aspect of this is the international
community granted sovereignty
to the Jews, to the Jewish state after
World War 2. No. It did not. Britain
did this
with the Belfort declaration.
Of course, there was many, many different things
between then and now that have happened, but
the reality to make this about the international
community, which by the way,
it's in it that in and of itself
is always an illusion. You know who they
don't include when they say that? Most of
the Middle East, most of China and Russia.
So pretty much it means Europe and United
States. That's not the international community, guys. They're
always playing these games. And Israel has had
to fight defensive war after defensive war. You
mean genocide? Ethnic cleansing? You mean documented over
and over and over? I mean, most of
the atrocity propaganda lies you saw this time
were actually taken from events that were carried
out by Israeli extremists since 1948.
From the bait from the stomach being cut
open, all these things. These are actual historic
precedent that we've seen happen by Israeli extremists.
My point is for him to call them
defensive war shows you how blind he is
or how dishonest. With every country coming to
crush it ever since then just to exist.
Wow.
I mean, I don't
every single thing he said there is is
probably written on a card by an Israeli
propagandist,
and you can prove. And most people are
come are on their own path, finding this
stuff out today.
This is while they are committing
genocide in real time.
Just continue to let that sink in. If
people like this are standing up and screaming
about supporting this, well, I guarantee they can
see that most people in the world see
what they're doing.
Why would they do that? Why would they
hurt themselves like that for a especially politicians?
I think we can answer that pretty easily.
There's something driving that.
Here,
Michael Tracy points out another clip.
Proclaimed his heartfelt belief that the 3rd temple
will will be rebuilt in Jerusalem.
That this is the prophetic conversation, guys. This
is the end times.
And the idea is that that means the
destruction of the current situation, and that is
currently a mosque. So these are people that
are acting like they're
in line with international law and free speech
and human rights
when those are just simply tools they're using,
word they're saying to justify rather to hide
the fact that they're supporting a genocidal entity
for their own interests.
And today, Jennifer and I and others had
a chance to go see the western wall
of the Temple Mount, the western wall tunnels,
so much of the old city. And as
you stand there, you can't help but behold
the miracle before you.
And it got me thinking about another miracle
that I hope all of you don't see
too far away.
Because 1917
was a miracle.
1948
was a miracle.
1967
was a miracle.
A miracle.
Just brushed over the Nakba.
The
if you ever cared to look into this
stuff, and I'm not talking about repetition of
narrative from people writing things or books. I'm
talking about the documented information that comes from
the time, the images, the statements from Jewish
people themselves who tried to stop what is
I mean, guys, this is information is undeniable.
The people that were there were raped and
tortured and mutilated and displaced, and it happened
more than once.
And this is I'm not talking just about
48, but I'm talking about the origin point
of the beginning of this and it went
continued forward.
I mean, if we can't acknowledge what we're
watching take place right now and many of
them pointing back to what they've done back
in 48 or let's do another NOCA worse
than before, all of it is on the
surface.
And to call that what are the word
he did use?
1948 was a miracle. A miracle.
A miracle.
I mean, this is my point about a
lot of this stuff. Instead of just saying
they're lying about that and it was a
justified situation,
but you gotta go further. You gotta say
not only was it just justified and they're
lying, it was the greatest thing that's ever
happened in our lifetime. It was a miracle.
It was godsend. It was, you know, whatever.
It's like saying, no. They're not starving. They've
got more food than ever. It's everything they
do.
You can decide why you think that is.
I quite frankly think it usually desperation with
what's going on right now but maybe it's
always been like that. 1967
was a miracle.
2017,
the declaration of Jerusalem at the capital was
a miracle. Illegal action. And there's no reason
why the miracle
of the reestablishment
of the temple on the temple mount is
not possible.
Of the reestablishment miracle. And there's no reason
why the miracle
of the reestablishment
of the temple on the temple mount is
not possible.
So you have to understand what they're talking
about is the destruction of the, of Al
Aqsa Mosque. Right? And one of the most
holy places in the planet for for for
everybody, it seems. Even and the point is
that you have to realize that this is
something that
that necessitates the destruction of what's there
and fulfilling a biblical prophecy of creating the
3rd temple or rebuilding the 3rd temple. And
to them, that be that is the beginning
of the end times, which goes along with
the destruction of the west, with the I
mean, all the things we talked about. And,
again, I I should somebody's commented before, I
should probably have Adam Green back on the
show since this is something he's been talking
about for a really long time. And I
I'll reference his I'll direct you to his
work if you wanna understand more about the
ins and outs of that alarming prophetic point.
Now, I will appoint I will say that
a lot of the conversation ends up around,
like, a lot of you know, well, the
bottom line is this stuff is easily proven.
Whether it's rabbis talking about this, whether it's
people in the Knesset.
You have to understand that there is a
clear issue with people believing this is going
to happen which comes at the expense of
other countries.
I don't know why that's not concerning for
people. But I I'll just the point is
that I'm not the person to go into
the nuance of the deeper aspects of that.
I mean, really, I should but there's a
1,000 things I'd love to go deeper into
with how much is going on in the
world today. But I'll reference still direct you
to his work because it's it's pretty scary.
But that's what he's talking about right there.
That that overlaps with the idea we pointed
out before of the of the heifer and
the all these different points are coming together.
And these are people that are about to
be in positions of power.
Again, this is the this is guys for
secretary of defense.
When you realize the influence that might that
it'll have over actions of foreign policy,
including what would drive that very thing to
come to pass and blame it on the
Palestinians?
I don't know how it would happen. You
don't know how it would happen, but I
know that it could happen.
That's all I know.
And a step in that process, a step
in every process is the recognition
that facts and activities on the ground truly
matter. And that's why going and visiting Judea
and Samaria,
understanding that
sovereignty,
the very sovereignty of Israeli soil
Or, you know, the Palestinians you stole it
from.
Israeli
cities,
locations,
is a critical next step to showing the
world that this is the land for Jews
and the land of Israel. Oh, okay. And
But you you don't understand that other the
people, the Jews live there. Right?
Yes, he does. Just to make sure you
understand that. But it's only land for the
Jews though, and that's totally not racist.
I believe, as was mentioned, he said you
need to,
what was mentioned is you need to buy
the ticket.
Don't just wish for 40 years to win
the lottery, buy the ticket.
I would submit to you in light of
the support you have in Washington DC,
the support you have amongst patriotic Americans, amongst
evangelical Christians He's talking to the Zionist entities
here. Amongst believers, amongst republicans, even amongst some
democrats who can barely say it anymore in
Washington. Buy
Israel because I truly believe this is a
moment where America will have your back.
Think about that in the context. This is
not old.
Do what you need to do. We got
your back.
After he references biblical prophecy.
Guys, this is not confusing. Okay? And this
your peep this is going to be the
secretary of defense. Should this go the way
it looks like it will. You have you
have Donald Trump in the White House. You
have Mike Pence as vice president. You have
Nikki Haley at the UN. You have true
believers in Israel and America that have your
back.
Think about that. K. So now we're at
Donald Trump administration part 2.
This is pretty scary to me. Right? So
you have to realize that what happened during
his first administration were steps building towards where
we are now. And, of course, even during
the Biden administration, despite the shifting of narratives,
they continued all of it. Do you realize
they funded and armed and supported the Israeli
agenda more than anybody?
Even as Trump comes in and goes, they
won't exist if he, she gets elected.
Of in contrary to literally everything in front
of you. Because it's about trying to convince
republicans of that in this context.
Patrick Henningsen says, wow. This one really takes
the biscuit, folks. Pete Hegseth,
a second tier weekend host on Fox News,
has been gifted a cabinet position as defense
secretary in Trump's admin. His qualification and undying
evangelical loyalty to loyalty to Israel, which by
the way, again, is one of the reasons
why I get the sense that the democrats
will not or rather the government won't confirm
him so they can blame it on the
democrats and ultimately, what, jam Pompeo back in
that position?
Guys, I it shouldn't be that hard to
wrap your mind around. Either way,
it's just like the 2 party illusion, just
like the selection process, they get what they
want either way.
Both of them are Zionist. Both of them
are wildly pro as brutal.
But he goes on to say the resume,
and he will highlight Michael Tracey
saying,
a moving excerpt from the Pete Haggis book,
America's crusade,
our fight to stay free. It says, simply
put, if you don't understand why Israel matters
and why it's so central to the story
of western civilization,
with America being its greatest manifestation?
What?
Oh, okay. I actually read that wrong. He's
talking about America being western civilization's greatest manifestation.
He's saying that if you don't understand why
Israel matters, then you don't live in history,
or you're ignoring it. America's story is inextricably
linked to Judeo Christian history and the modern
state of Israel. Well, it is not, guys.
It is be oh, because of Zionist influence.
Yes.
You can't you can love America without loving
Israel, but that tells me your knowledge of
the bible and western civilization is woefully incomplete.
Of the bible and western civilization as if
those are synonymous things. See my point?
I'm a Christian, guys, and I can point
out that that's absurdly stupid. And he says,
if you're going to crusade, you need to
know the total totality of your mission. Who's
gonna crusade?
You realize he's got a tattoo I'll show
you in a minute of a crusader of
a cru a,
knights of the Templar cross and a bunch
of other things, Hebrew on his arm that
means something other than what people are saying.
These are really this is a real thing
that's happening right now, guys. It really does
concern the hell out of me. Not even
to get into the interesting overlaps of the
Crusades themselves and the Templar themselves and a
lot of unpacked information there. But he says
the this brief section is not in intended
to provide a full defense of Israel, but
as an aspiring American crusader,
consider it homework. A great place to start,
once again, is PragerU. Yeah. Because we all
know they're a bastion of totally not wildly
pro Israel, but it says check out the
videos such as why don't you support Israel?
Israel's legal founding, and why does America spend
so much on Israel? All of which are
trying to aggress get you to blindly support
Israel, because that seems to be their job.
Israel and its place among
the nations in by Benjamin Netanyahu.
This is the fuel of America. You should
love Israel. Guys, statements like that scare me.
I mean, guys, they're talking about something an
entity that has acted against United States at
every possible opportunity.
As somebody recently asked,
and it was a Republican. Can somebody please
show me where Israel has ever been here
for the United States? Were they were they
here with it during with during floods, during
earthquakes, during anything. When when has Israel showed
up to support Americans in any way? Not
even in foreign policy. It's the exact reverse.
United States funding and blind support has gone
towards whatever crimes Israel's been committing since its
inception.
Can somebody point out to me where they
were supporting American interests? You know, not bombing
the US' liberty or bought 911 or any
other example where they actively did the opposite,
But where they've ever, ever stood up and
been there in support of the of the
United States
just to support the United States. Or more
well, I take that aback. Even that is
hard I bet you won't find, but American
people.
You show me where Israel has stepped up
to do something for the American people
because it was there to help. It doesn't
exist.
In fact, you can prove the opposite.
Ask the people from the US Liberty. Ask
people in any number of different examples over
the years of Israel
taking advantage of the US government at the
expense of Americans, like, right now.
It says, we share history. We share faith.
We share faith?
Maybe you do.
Christianity and Jude and and and well, first
of all, and Zionism are not even remotely
the same thing, but even Judaism and Christianity
are quite obviously different things. But we share
faith?
We share freedom?
No. We don't. Everything about these places are
very different, but is the United States is
rapidly going in this direction. It says, we
love free people, free expression, and free markets.
You know, unless they're Palestinian, or unless it's
a certain kind of flag, or unless you
wear a certain thing, or unless you look
a certain way, or unless you're not Jewish.
But everything else, we love it all if
you're in this very small category of people
we like.
That's how stupid this is. It's so objectively
clear that that's not true. And it says,
and whereas America is blessed with 2 big,
beautiful oceans to protect it, Israel surrounded on
all sides by countries that either seek to
or either used to seek or still seek
to wipe it off the map, which is
not even objectively true.
There's clear agendas now about I mean, guys,
these people, even Hamas, for crying out loud,
has changed their charter about simply getting rid
of Zionism.
Of course, they could be lying. But let's
be honest about where the information shows. And,
obviously, that's not this is not this is
about honesty.
These people are actively trying to fight for
themselves to no longer be oppressed by Israel
and United States.
The battle wages on Israeli soil as well.
With each trip I take to Israel, which
seems to happen all the time. In my
personal time, I discover a new way in
which Islamist and their leftist enablers seek to
deny Jewish history and heritage.
God, it's so lazy, the whole thing. This
guy is alarming,
as Patrick points out. He says the resume
before Pete Hagath Hegseth became a male spokesmodel
for Fox News breakfast show was he was
a platoon leader at Guantanamo Bay
offshore torture facility, lording over Afghan taxi drivers,
school teachers, and goat hoarders herders. Minnesota National
Guard,
he did a few tours in Iraq and
Afghanistan.
2 wars that were under utter debacles. But,
hey, I suppose all that country
counts excuse me, has a gold star.
The point is Guantanamo Bay?
Oh, my god. Guys, there's so many examples.
These are the exact opposite of what anybody
wants. And he goes, yep. That actually happened.
And one of them was the the notorious,
psychotic US war criminal, Eddie Gallagher. And says,
Fox News privately lobbied Trump to pardon accused
war criminals.
We saw that clip. You saw this clip.
Here's one you didn't see, but this is
in case you missed it. Here are 4
clips including a a 4 3 clips you've
seen, 4th one that you haven't yet. All
of which are very alarming.
When I came here, a lot of people
asked me, a couple people this morning in
a press conference.
What can Israel learn from America? Was asked
a couple of times. And each time I
stopped and I said,
you need to reverse that question.
The question is what can America learn from
Israel? But Right. How how can we better
command a genocide?
Predominantly in American culture today, American culture is
large sleep.
Largely asleep to the realities of the world
that we face. Yeah. I agree with that.
And you're the one continuing to keep them
under that slumber right now by lying to
them about what we should be supporting.
I mean,
raping people in prison
and discussing why that should be happening even
more, being aggressively defended by people online, having
the IDF protest to maintain that reality, to
break them out, or the ongoing torture that
we can now prove
across the board, ongoing use of human shields
that are identified by every human rights group
in the effing world,
or just the continual murder of children.
70% of them who's they've killed, 70% are
women and children.
Have you seen a single example of Hamas
human shield? Not one.
Doesn't mean it didn't happen. But I can
show you at least 7 of you Israel
doing it just since October 7th. Do we
wanna learn from the way they're committing genocide,
or are you really just talking about we
need to adapt to what Zionism will become?
Here's an interesting point. For all those in
the republican side that are screaming about the
influence of Islam and how they're gonna push
Sharia law on our schools, maybe you should
start asking about whether Zionism is exactly that.
And that's all about hiding where this actually
goes. About why you're gonna be taught something
different or your children will be taught what
the what they're preaching to you under a
guise of Christianity. Maybe you should be asking
whether that is the real problem. I'm not
saying either one you can prove, but the
reality is how willfully blind
the rumors of the world will be. I
always point to that just because she's such
a cartoon about this conversation, but there's a
lot of them in regard to that exact
point
or any of them. So we can point
out the the logical concerns about Russia or
China doing anything like this, but then ignore
physical,
embodied, real world examples of this happening from
Israel in our country, whether it's the IDF
in our in our military
or our government
or the influence of Israel on our politics,
right on the surface with APAC bragging about
it.
My point is they're not they're not missing
that. They're choosing to ignore it, and the
real question should be, are they chew are
they pointing to it in order are they
pointing to China and Russia or anything else
in order to hide that?
Certainly could just be ignorance, but I think
it's more than that.
Largely is asleep to the depth of the
threats on the horizon. Exactly.
And the state of Israel, for reasons that
you all understand far better than I, is
not asleep,
and is forced Yeah. Because they're conducting it.
Each and every day to wake up under
under the umbrella of existential threats. So I
I when I speak in America They mean
it's not hard to point out that there
are threats,
but it's it's sort of like it's a
it's a might a macrocosm
of rather a microcosm of that would be
what happened in Amsterdam.
Maccabi fans come in and start beating everybody
up, chanting Arabs should die. There's no schools
because all the children are killed. F the
Arabs. The IDF will continue beating people up
with sticks, burning Palestinian flags, lighting a taxi
on fire. And then when somebody fights back,
they scream Jewish pogrom.
Right? Okay. So exactly the same point here,
that Israel is actively carrying out the worst
things you can see, embodying the worst things
we can talk about, not every Israeli or
every Jew, but specifically Zionist Israeli government.
And It's forced each and every day to
wake up. And, of course, that causes threats.
Just like in Amsterdam. Yes. Doing those things
might cause someone to be like, I'm gonna
attack you.
But and even though we can objectively argue
that violence is bad and that may still
be a crime,
you can also stand back and go, but,
yeah, but they had it coming. That's not
that's not a legal argument. But still, we
can look at what's going on and recognize
that, I don't know, illegally occupying someone's entire
territory and ethically cleansing them might cause repercussions,
or occupying Syria illegally, or occupying
Lebanon illegally, or occupying Egypt illegally, or any
number of other things they've done,
or assassinating military scientists, or assassinating just
leaders under our guise of diplomacy.
Gee, I wonder why those might cause repercussions.
So the point is obvious.
Yes. There are threats, but realize who is
the catalyst, who is the reason behind why
these things are happening. This argument that they
just wanna kill Jews is the same lazy
argument they apply to everything else we're seeing.
If you if you concede the lies today,
make sure you reflect on how that's been
the lie from the beginning.
Not to say that there's no anti rather
no racism,
but to clearly point out that in by
and large over history, Zionism has created that,
even manufactured that to justify its existence.
Under under the umbrella of existential threats. So
I I when I speak in America, I
always end by talking about a quote that
is or a a a sentiment that is
oftentimes used in America,
which is that veterans will be tempted to
say, I fought.
I put on a uniform. I went to
Iraq or Afghanistan or World War 1 or
World War 2 or Korea or Vietnam so
that my kids won't have to.
I fought so that they can live in
peace,
and it is a tempting
thought.
In fact, in World War 2 after after
American GIs deployed around the globe to defeat
Nazis
and the imperial Japanese liberate
camps too late in in many places, but
be a part of that. That generation went
back to America and said,
we did fight the Nazis so the next
generation can live more free.
But I counsel nobody to say that anymore,
and I never say it myself.
I didn't fight so that my kids
won't won't have to fight. I fought knowing
that my kids will have to fight as
well.
And
and maybe that's by force of arms.
Lord knows the policies our country has pursued
in light of the threats that we face
have have brought terror to our shores as
well. Maybe that will require a rifle. But
if not
Or, you know, manufacturing it, funding, working with
ISIS, Al Qaeda,
manufacturing regime change,
literally
using terrorists around the world to drive or,
you know, working with Israel who funds them
as well.
It's all so simple. And it's certainly possible
that he literally doesn't know that. But either
way, blindly working with an entity that like,
literally referencing World War 2 and fighting Nazis,
Well, again, as I said before, you can
literally prove. Here's a Haaretz article about it,
by the way. The Lihey party, which is
a foundational element of Zionism, where they still
give a Lihey pin today,
continued to seek an ally with Nazi Germany
even after the final solution began. Now here
is one early point for post October 7,
2023.
This guy's name was Ezra Yakin, was a
member of the Lihei, the Zionist tar Harris
Organization Group that twice attempted to ally with
Nazi Germany,
and he was the one they were
videotaping in the beginning. Speaking to IDF members
saying, kill them all. There's nobody innocent. All
of them erased their memory. Amalek,
it's been obvious since day 1.
My children, my our 3 boys, Gunnar Boone
and Rex who are 6, 4, and 10
months old will be raised to love the
lord their god,
raised to love their country,
raised to love their state and their community
and their family, and to be willing to
fight for them all. And stand by their
understand and know who their friends are in
this world, and have the willingness and ability
to stand by them in times easy
and tough, you know, in vows, in sickness,
and in health. Wow. So we're married to
Israel now, apparently? The relationship,
richer or for poorer,
relationships See, it's very clear how he's very
trying very much trying to stress the fact
that I train my children to fight for
Israel, but I think recognize he doesn't wanna
say that explicitly, so he stumbles around the
idea. So, like, he's talking about your ally.
It's obvious what he's doing right there.
The relationship between Israel and America in my
mind is inextricable. See? And then he just
went to it very clearly because I think
he's stumbling around. You're talking about fighting for
Israel. That's what he's talking about.
It it is one in which,
we stand side by side,
prepared to stand with our friends,
in every way. And we have a leader
right now who has not
and who has who has take who has
turned in the Oh, you mean Biden who
literally funded their genocide unequivocally without question?
Liars. Other direction.
I mean, the bottom line, guys, is it's
obvious these people are blindly fighting for a
foreign entity.
Now here is Trump's nominee for secretary defense.
And here is
his kind of I mean, by the way,
you could argue these iron crosses go back
to Nazism too, but with knight templar and
so on. But you can see some writing
in Hebrew right there. And the point is
this person simply says,
and now you can decide to argue. I'm
sure everyone has different opinions on these things,
but he's arguing
that it means Yahweh, which is different than
the Hebrew word for Jesus, which is Yeshua,
which means he arguably believes in the different
God. And then you can decide for yourself
in all of this. Either way, I find
it pretty telling.
Now here, I'll include that for you guys.
Now Kenneth Roth says Trump's new nominee for
sec defense secretary, Pete hack Hegseth,
was known for encouraging Trump's to pardon,
war criminals.
And here's the article about it. Fox News
host privately encouraged him to pardon accused war
criminals.
I just, you know, again, it's the same
thing as Bolton and Pompeo and the rest
of them. Doesn't matter. Crimes don't matter. A
lot of matter. We matter. And our agenda
matters. And if we do it, that makes
it legal, just like Nixon, I think, famously
said. That's the about the president. That's how
they all think.
Here, last point on him. Here's his interview
back on March 17th. My interview with Israeli
prime minister Netanyahu. Israel needs our support.
This is March 17th. You realize how obvious
the genocide was at that point?
About as obvious as it is now.
They don't care, guys. Blind support for a
foreign government while they commit genocide. That's what
you're electing, or rather that's what you were
told you elected to what was selected by
the power structure. Now let's talk about Stephen
Witkoff.
Trump and his statement, and you can see
this on Twitter itself. So he did state
that he picked him.
And here's my example about oh, here. I
had that from before. So here is
Trump posting this
on November 13th,
5:18 AM. Harris Jerusalem post on November 12th.
Breaking. President-elect Donald Trump has appointed real estate
investor Steven Witkoff, a real estate investor,
to be a special envoy to the Middle
East.
And by the way, apparently, a guy who's
all interested invested in building in Gaza.
Surprise, surprise.
But, yeah, a day a day ahead of
time. So I guess Israel gets to know
about US picks for Trump's administration before American
people do. America first.
Here he is
on this account called Nazi Hunters as Trump's
new Middle East envoy, Stephen Witkoff, attended Netanyahu's
speech in July describing it as powerful, epic.
Being in that room felt almost spiritual.
Same points we're making, and this guy is
literally talking about a speech where Netanyahu lied
about atrocity propaganda. And by the way, remember,
I think it was, like, 57 standing ovations
showing you how completely bought off our entire
congress is. All of them are in the
same mindset, guys. Here he says, prime minister's
speech was epic and deeply moving. I had
the distinct privilege of being there. So, again,
a personal invitee. This shows you how this
all connects.
President Trump was the strongest and most vocal
supporter of Israel in generations, he says. President
Trump's leadership was good for Israel and the
entire region. Hardly.
Hardly. Anything good for Israel right now is
definitively bad for the region. It's obvious. Anybody
objective could point that out. With Donald Trump,
the Middle East experienced historic levels of peace.
I don't know where they're getting this ridiculous
narrative from.
It's it's it's it's it's actually very easy
to prove the opposite. It's only gotten worse.
So it's easy to say how bad it
is now and point back and say, look
how nice and peaceful it was. No. If
you look at the the administration before that,
it's on an escalating scale.
Now the difference being the US ongoing war
of terror,
the point is that what Trump continued to
do led to the place we are now.
It continued to make it more unstable. The
actions against Iran, the actions against Syria, the
actions against Iraq, it's the same thing.
It goes strength prevents wars except it literally
does not. It literally continues to show that
their belligerence, which truly is their illusion of
strength outside of just physical military power, which
does say some may mean a lot. But
the point being, it's not everything. We can
see that today with the way the world
warfare works.
Strength prevents wars is is might,
might equals right. That's that's their true mindset
that they've made pretty clear.
What we've seen that cascade into, despite always
making that point, is more conflict.
So they fight, they strike, you strike back.
You you on go. You it's always the
idea for this is Israel's point in the
same way they've been acting that they get
the last they will they'll if you strike
us, we'll strike back. And then when you
feel obligated to respond, we'll respond after that.
It's a cascade, and they this is the
point. It never stops.
Peace through strength
is not acting militarily. It is demonstrating that
you're a
a powerful and a strong entity, not through
verbal
belligerent
rhetoric,
but by your presence. That's what that really
means. Strength strong people don't need to stand
up stand up and scream that we're gonna
attack you, or how strong we are, or
that we'll do x, y, and z more
attack you, stronger than ever in the history.
That's weakness.
We used to know
that. It says Iran's money was cut off,
which prevented their funding of global terror. Again,
narrative.
Embarrassingly fake narrative.
Global terror? You mean occupying foreign countries or
funding moderate rebels or Hamas or no. That's
that is Israel and United States, the leading
state sponsors of terrorism in the world. And
it says Israel's neighbors part neighbors part, were
part of a unprecedented peace accord. No. They
were not. You coerced heads of
of influenced and
regime change governments in some cases to sign
an agreement that their peoples aggressively disagreed with,
which has been shown ever since. Even Saudi
Arabia pulled back because of the same points
of what they're doing in Palestine, but they
love to just recreate the narrative.
Yeah. And he says, because recognize rec to
it says,
I tried to jump ahead. I commend the
prime minister on his address.
This is while they're committing genocide.
And other world leaders who want to meet
Donald Trump because they recognize his policy of
America's strength was a tool for world peace.
I guess, yeah, only in your in your
fantasy, in your I mean, the this doesn't
exist anywhere outside of a narrative created by
Republicans for the American country.
Carly Kingsley says, remember when Jared Kushner praised
the very valuable potential of Gaza's waterfront property
and suggested Israel should remove civilians while it
cleans up the strip?
But, yeah, also Kushner who's playing a role
in the fitting out of Trump's administration
right now, according to Howard Lutnick.
He goes, anyway, here's Steven Witkoff. He has
no experience in diplomacy or Middle East, but
he's a successful real estate investor.
Gee, I wonder how that's gonna play a
factor. What do you think?
I'm actually, I forgot what this was. I
don't think this is even his account. I
think I had it up for something
else. He didn't have the dash in between,
but anyway. Now here is Mike Waltz. Every
one of these people in exact same conversation
as his national security adviser.
Trump's pick APAC favorite, Mike Waltz, as national
security adviser.
Every single one of these people are funded
through the same channels, are blindly pro Israel,
pro Zionist, and and are will continue to
support the genocide.
Mike Waltz
promotes US Israeli economic political partnership in Jerusalem
for 2019,
which is just it's just benign. It just
it is what it is. I'm just simply
showing you the ongoing support for what an
an entity that has been clear
for decades.
Now it's been obvious if you're paying attention
from day 1, but this has become shockingly
clear for a very long time that this
this this government
is the epitome of everything we claim we're
supposed to fight.
Here he is on a pro Israel America
where he's got his own page supporting him.
Gen x girl says, Mike Waltz, who has
been drumming for war with Iran on behalf
of Israel, is tapped by Trump to be
national security adviser. MAGA has been usurped by
MIGA, which is make Israel great again. You'll
all you'll either push back hard now or
resign yourself to replay repeating the Dems' mistake.
Here he is in a tweet saying if
Israel fails to fully implement the US demands
by November 13th, the US could suspend its
military assistance.
Right. And guess what? They didn't do that.
They did not meet that. They, in fact,
continued to do the same starvation, genocidal tactics.
And Matt Miller and Patel and the rest
of them just said never you're wrong for
pointing it out.
I haven't even gone into it. I'll probably
go the next show I do about foreign
policy probably tomorrow or the next day will
be focused on some of that. The illusion
of that deadline, the lie about the ongoing
starvation tactics and genocide. His point is not
we should point out that it matters that
they're violating the law, which by the way,
even is US entities have pointed out, as
international law has pointed out, as an idiot
can see because it's so blatantly obvious.
But he goes on to say instead, while
Iran is planning their next attack, you mean
because they're being targeted?
But even on that point, we can't prove
that Iran is doing anything. This is narrative
built to make it seem that Israel has
to be ready to fight because Iran's about
to no.
Objectively, you can see that what Iran did
last was let them know what was gonna
happen in order to actually pull back on
this.
And they still got through, which is why
it's embarrassing for Israel, why they're gonna fight,
act like they're, you know, defending against the
evil encroachment when what they're doing everywhere in
the world is exactly that. Same with the
United States. They are the example of what
they profess to be fighting in the world.
But he goes, the Biden Harris are threatening
to hang Israel to dry. You know why
that's actually true in the out the dry
part? Because they wouldn't be able to commit
genocide for one more day if we stop
funding it.
Maybe it's a little, maybe a week. The
point is that
they know that,
And they want you to continue funding that.
To score pro
to score a win with progressives?
You see how it's so easy it is
to frame it as a left right politic
dynamic and get people to blindly ignore it?
Despite the fact that this is an objectively
wrong thing.
What they're doing is it's not left or
right. It's murder.
It is rape and torture.
It is starvation. It's famine.
And he wants you to go, who cares
that we all can prove that? They're our
ally no matter what, which is ultimately the
point. He said it's a betrayal to American
security. No. What they're doing is the threat
to American security in every possible way.
What we can prove, at least from APAC
tracker, $235,000
Mike Waltz has taken from APAC.
What about
John Ratcliffe, Trump's pick for CIA director?
Well, this goes back a long way. We
have plenty of points of the overlapping, you
know, the relation the Trump administration to the
past.
Free prints simply goes, never mind. Oh, well,
here, this is coming off of, this one
I think we've read earlier. It says, Kash
Patel, Trump's top choice for CIA director,
wants to immediately release
classified JFK assassination files. Sealed 911 records, Jeffrey
Epstein's client list, the Russiagate files,
and the truth about the Jan January 6th
pipe bomber. Sounds wonderful to me. Give us
the names.
But then he goes, never mind.
As we can expect, because that stuff will
never happen, Trump's actual pick for CIA director
is John Ratcliffe.
He is as entrenched in the surveillance state
as they come. Over the past year, Ratcliffe
joined forces with Mike Pompeo to push for
the renewal of the Pfizer warrantless surveillance.
Yay. Freedom. Rebel. Fight the deep state. Right,
guys? A tool that allows the government to
spy on American citizens without due process. Ratcliffe's
classified briefings reportedly played a key role in
convincing
speaker Mike Johnson to reverse his prior opposition
and throw his support behind Faiza.
Ratcliffe's roots in the surveillance swamp run deep,
appointed by George Bush, w Bush, as chief
of anti terrorism and national security for the
Eastern District of Texas. He cut his teeth
during the which, you know,
I
earned his his
what's the right way to frame that? I
guess, I shouldn't even say it. You most
people know what that means. You know, kind
of earned his his position,
you know, coming up through the ranks,
during the Bush administration post 911 assault on
privacy rights. You know? Okay.
Everything we're talking about, what from Patriot Act,
911 forward, or even before that.
You realize how many people in this even
just so far are are
every single thing that Republicans would argue that
they're fighting.
And the Fed, stop the 3 little hate
3 little agencies,
maha. I mean, every single one of them.
You realize RFK is yet to be given
an exact position. So I don't even think
that's I mean, I hope so. But it
says later, he cofounded a strategy advisory firm
with John Ashcroft, Bush's first attorney general, and
an architect of the Patriot Act, a law
that opened the door to unprecedented government spying
on its own citizens. Now realize that was
part 1 of what I argue was the
the biosecurity state part 2 for COVID 19.
It says Ratcliffe's career seems to be defined
by allegiance to the surveillance state, not resistance
to it. This isn't an outsider or a
reformer. This is someone deeply embedded in the
national security apparatus who has consistently advocated for
expanded government power at the expense of individual
rights.
Sure. Something could change. I hope so. But
for anybody right now to pretend like this
is a good pick,
simply because of what other Republicans say,
Guys, that's the kind of naivety that I
think everyone should call out. Even if you
may turn out to be right, everything on
the table shows you this is a bad
that history shows this is what will happen.
Now I'm not saying that the opposite is
true. Either we don't come out and say
we know he'll be a bad pick. We
don't. We have yet to see it. But
objectively looking at the evidence shows this is
not what we were promised.
That's that's obviously the point out from anybody.
And holding out hope that he could change
or that Trump convinced him to fight the
deep state or whatever you think or whatever
narrative is being presented,
to lean into narrative versus what we have
in front of us is just wishful thinking.
Even if it turns out to be correct,
it's still the wrong thing to do in
the moment.
It says,
Ratcliffe at the helm with him there expect
more of the same. Unrestrained CIA, continued erosion
of privacy, deepening of the surveillance state under
the banner of national security. It says it
says, I've got my fingers crossed that he
releases what Trump has promised, but I won't
bet on it. Well, guys, we again, we
have a precedent. Trump didn't do it last
time. Didn't lock her up, released some
meaning JFK documents that didn't give you any
more insight, which is what they're gonna do
again, I argue.
I mean, I I'm expecting to see, you
know, if we're gonna pretend this is, what
was promised, freeing Ross, ending the fed,
ending the 3 letter agencies, making America healthy
again. Like, I don't I just think these
things are so obviously not what they're ever
going to do based on what we know
about them. I hope that's not the case.
Here he is, trip Michael Tracey pointing out,
saying Iran has committed acts of war against
the United States
by hacking the Trump campaign email. All all
the things that were floated by
intelligence apparatus or Israel themselves that were never
verified,
he's saying, and allegedly plotting to assassinate Trump.
This is not an this is this is
from this is a recent conversation. We already
went over how embarrassing that ridiculous affidavit was,
where ultimately you had Jewish Americans attacking Jewish
Americans and the FBI saying there's a guy
in Tehran that was dictating it all. A
guy who willingly interviewed with the FBI because
that perfectly lines up. Right? How do we
know that guy even exists? How do we
know he's an IDF agent or Assad? We
don't is the point. It was lazy and
I think very clearly about this agenda.
Here's what he said.
It's no secret that, that the democrats want
to, obtain a ceasefire,
in advance of the presidential election coming up
to help Kamala Harris and then By the
way, now that we're past that frame,
right,
save for whatever things might happen around trying
to manipulate. I mean, I don't I don't
see any indication of it. All the hype
from Donald, Alex Jones over the last week
about, we see it. They're starting to steal
it. We don't know. I'm I don't see
that. It certainly could. It wouldn't surprise me.
But now that we're past that point of
pretending everything you do has to be divided
between Trump and Kamala, which then forces you
to pick things you don't want. Now that
we're past that, let's be honest about this
stuff. Okay? Let's acknowledge that these things are
not what we wanted. Because it's not about
trying to fight for anybody else. Trump is
the one there. He got it. He's in
position. Okay? So let's start being clear about
what these things are. So if we're talking
about them getting a ceasefire done, well, who
cares about that? We're past that point. They
are now in position.
I'm not saying this this is before that.
What I'm simply saying is now going forward.
Right? So now here we are.
So who wouldn't want a ceasefire? Why are
we talking about continuing an ongoing war or
genocide that even most Republicans or conservatives seem
to call out? Because it's about Israel's agenda.
In every way at the expense of Americans,
even if you just look at the money
that you're spending,
but far far more than that. In so
doing, they're really willing to put,
you know, politics above our our national security.
Oh, so I didn't know that, by the
way. So, again, this is it's good timing.
And then someone in the chat saying that
Trump just said RFK will be an HHS.
Okay. Same same point. We'll let this play
out, and we'll we'll address that. My point
is always has been the same the entire
time. I did not think it would happen.
I didn't even think that would happen. But
yet, guess what? Right now, it still has
not happened. Same point. It's kinda the one
I was joking point I made in the
beginning,
where we're going, well, let's wait and see.
Let's these are just words. And then Trump
comes out and says and they go, see,
we told you. It's like, yeah. You those
are still just words. So So you're proving
my point by falling for that, not in
the chat, but people out there. Same thing
about, like, rub Rubio or Pompeo. It's like,
these things have yet to happen. All of
it is still possible.
But so if he said that, it does
I've just like I said with, Pompeo and
Nikki Haley, I would argue that simply doubling
down on
it does make it more likely, even just
from pressure. So I'm I'm glad that happened.
But let's play this and we'll come back
to it.
And it is troubling, Maria, because how far
are they willing to go? Well, they're as
you point out, they're willing to ignore acts
of war. I mean, when when our own
intelligence community tells us that they're hacking into
the Trump campaign to help, to help Kamala
Harris win the election.
When when they engage in an act of
war of trying to assassinate,
President Trump.
And perhaps most importantly, when they engage in
the act of war
of firing through through its Houthi controlled rebels.
Fake news.
This is the laziest argument that they've always
put forward. This is my point. This guy
is a swamp creature. He is tapping into
the old school narratives that they've never stopped
pushing that we can prove are false.
Even the assassination attempts come nobody has given
a shred of evidence that there was even
a other than some intelligence says Iran linked
plot, which the one we've been given is
a cartoon.
And that's not even they've been saying all
these are Iran. They've been floating this the
entire time. Why? Because Israel is driving the
US to go to war with Iran. All
of this is another country's agenda. Ballistic missiles
at 3 US warships,
and there had been no actions and no
consequences to those acts of war by Iran,
it unfortunately tells you how far,
the Democrats are willing to go, to to
stop Donald Trump. And, you know, I think
it larger at play here, Maria, is not
just this short term election, but that it
really reveals the failed strategy of the Democrats
over the last 10 years in dealing with,
Iran. You know, the famous
Obama doctrine which was that look we can
deter
Iran diplomatically and it won't come at the
expense of Israel. Well, Barack Obama was wrong.
He misunderstood,
the lethality and the evil nature of the
Iranian regime.
See, if you frame them as just evil
and wrong and bad, I mean, that that's
the dehumanization.
Again,
I challenge you to look objectively
at the Iranian government and compare it to
either the US government or the Israeli government.
And I'm telling you, you could go at
it as if you take every single thing
Israel's ever said about Iran's government at face
value. Almost all of it's fake news. I
should say I said that for Trump. In
for incorrect. False.
And then compare it to what what you
can prove
about the US and Israeli government. I'm not
talking about what they dispute. What we can
prove and even just what they've been forced
to acknowledge.
You compare those two things and you will
be blown away by how obviously they are
far more a terrorist entity in the world.
The best they can do is connect it
with the Houthis, with Hamas, which is real
funds, and we can prove it, and and
Hezbollah.
And even then, they give you numbers like
so many hundreds of Americans. But Soleimani was
the focus. They they killed hundreds of Americans.
The only thing they can point to is
when they were defending
the the against the US invasion of Iraq
or Syria, and they were defending I think
it was Syria. They're defending against the illegal
invasion, which is an illegal invasion and occupation.
No objection. It's the case. It's obvious. There
was no declaration of war, let alone a
United Nations conversation. The point
is that they're defending against an illegal occupation.
Just because it's Americans doing the illegal action
does not mean that they're suddenly terrorists.
And then that's the best you can do?
Do you realize how many people we can
prove the US is killed even just as
a byproduct of their illegal bombings?
Or how about
the setting up a protest
in Syria and shooting people to blame it
on Assad, which we can prove? Or the
killing of people in Venezuela to blame it
on Maduro, or the killing of people in
Ukraine to blame it on the government? How
many times that we can prove they've been
doing this? Or Israel committing genocide in real
time,
literally killing children. I mean, guys, I don't
even wanna talk about stuff like this because
it kills me. And it's it's funny. For
some reason, the animal stuff gets me more
than anything. I literally just watched yesterday, and
it's not it's it's very provable,
a video of an IDF member taking a
little puppy
because it's a Palestinian dog throwing it off
a cliff.
Now that's just one IDF member. I'm not
as stupid and childish as some of the
people that would just go, this is what
like, I keep seeing videos where they show
1 person in a protest doing one screeny
thing and they go, that's what they all
do. That's the best they can do right
now. I'm not as dumb to say that
that means everybody an idea. But, nonetheless,
the amount of evidence we see of just
the sociopathic,
psychopathic,
d these people are something special in a
very bad way.
It just terrifies me that we can't acknowledge
that.
And what Israel has done is essentially employ
the Trump doctrine, a pressure, maximum pressure campaign
understanding that the only way to deter,
terrorists like Iran and their proxies is to
put your foot,
on on their throat. And Okay. So be
violent.
So maybe as Americans, we should go, but
what if they're making that up? Since we
can prove that, so we're literally driving violent
action against a foreign government that is going
to spin out into a major war, which
we've been there for a long time, based
on the fact that we can that intelligence
is saying x, y, and z when they've
been caught lying
more times than you can count, more times
than they've ever been right.
We can't consider that? How about operation Ajax,
where we know they've already illegally regime changed
the country and made it
a despotic hell hole for anybody other than
their elitist class.
And then they fight back and win their
country back. And this is just like the
game where they pretend they like when people
pick their own leaders except when they pick
people that they didn't choose. Funny how that
works.
Israel has done that. We should be assisting
Israel in doing so. But again,
political expediency,
and the quest for power by Kamala Harris
and the Democrats is is
resulting in American National Security taking a back
seat, unfortunately.
That's quite disturbing. You
Wow. Wow. Okay. So let's quickly deviate.
So here, this so guys, I'm sure you've
been following along. Just tuned in. The point
is that there's been a recent announcement about
RFK Junior. So let's let's take a look.
So this is again, so this was just
while I've been live. This came out.
Donald Trump posted on Twitter saying, I am
thrilled to announce that RFK Junior as the
United States secretary of health and human services.
For too long, Americans have been crushed by
the industrial food complex and drug companies and
and on and on. So, yeah, I I
hope that actually happens despite the obvious concern
that he is somehow compromised by Israel. I
don't know why in the world an anti
war candidate wouldn't call out the most obvious
genocide in history. Maybe because something
we saw the weird overlap with Rabbi Shmueli.
Where I mean, I I addressed this when
this first started. He literally was standing up
at while he was a presidential candidate and
and and
taking questions for RFK Junior. They're both on
the stage. Somebody gets up and asks RFK
a direct question. Shmueli stands up and answers
for him. And then eventually, he gives it
back to RFK Junior. You have to realize
how clear that is. That's either this guy
is so wildly inappropriate. So in that case,
why would RFK be aligned with him, or
he is speaking for him?
Now either way you look at it, it's
a very, it's something's clear there.
Anti war cat candidates do not support ongoing
genocide.
Either way, if this happens, I do think
his track record and health is one of
the best I've seen, and I hope that
does happen. But here's my point again.
This is just as unverified
as it was 2 weeks ago.
Just because well, I guess, well, I should
say one step more because Trump has said
it publicly.
But
RFK has said he wanted this. Oh, should
we play that clip again really quickly for
context, which is a good point to make
right now. But what if the senate doesn't
confirm him? Which is kind of what I
think is gonna happen. I hope I'm wrong.
But if that does happen, well, you'll blame
the democrats forever. Mind of the mind that
that was the point.
To keep you fighting each other when in
reality, they never would have allowed someone like
this to be able to change all the
things they're using to convict to manipulate you.
Now, this clip again,
I think is important
right after we saw this. Right? So ask
yourself, why did Howard Lutnick say this? Keith,
I I think, you know, that president Trump
has promised me is,
is control of the public health agencies, which
are HHS
and is Advanced transition team and the CE
control, a USDA.
2. And he said vaccines, stains. So what
happened now? Autism is 1 in 34. Here's
what he said. Cause autism Okay. Which is
what RFK pushes, which is why people are
concerned that he could get a I didn't
address it on the show this time, but
there's just that laughable stupid pushback when you
can prove there's plenty of peer reviewed science
links as
or or a lot more. I think they
brought that up for a very clear reason.
I think this is being set up for
them to try to stop him
for obvious reasons, and that will be blamed.
And it's the government. It's it's just an
I it's about giving you the illusion that
Trump was gonna change the world, but they
wouldn't let him, like, every other time. How
many times I made that point?
Job like HHS. And I don't even think
he could getting a job for HHS.
People are concerned that he could get a
job like HHS. And I don't even think
he could get job for HHS. Secretary? No.
You're saying he could not be in charge
of HHS? No. Of course not. Okay. So
he's not gonna be, like, asking secretary? No.
Okay.
Interesting, isn't it? So did Howard Lutnick lie?
Which I think is the more likely of
all this in order to get the Democrat
media to look stupid.
These are very petty points, but we see
it all the time from both sides.
Or he was lied to. Or maybe Trump
didn't feel that way, and he changed his
mind today. I mean, the guys, all of
this is possible. The larger point is always
is that right now, this is still just
a political statement. And that could change because
of the confirmation not happening or that Trump
changes his mind or he never met in
the first place or RFK pulls back for
any of the reasons. So as always, we
wait for it to actually happen. The same
with Marco Rubio, the same with any of
them. Massey and Rumpa, we don't know until
it actually happens. That's the important stance. That's
what I've been saying from the very beginning
of this conversation.
And even then, even though I'm worried about
the lies from RFK, I still think that
this would be a a ultimate now that
we're past the choosing to violate your principles
to lie to lesser of evils, the whole
thing, now that we're here, because I think
that was always the point, I can it's
I think it's a good thing to have
R. R. K. In a position if he's
gonna fall through with anything he says. That
does not then make the whole thing good.
That's my point. Obviously, this is I think
that's a part of how they convince you
all of this is in your interest when
they force you into your technocratic panopticon.
But Kevorka Macian says the recent appointees of
Donald Trump exposed how deeply the US political
system is corrupted to keep the same power
players in rotation.
He says, think Mike Pompeo and Nikki Hillier
are out? Think again. Enter Pete Hegsa, John
Ratcliffe, Mike Huckabee, Elise Stefanik.
Ready to play the game with a new
face. Different names,
same agenda.
Well put.
Now another one we didn't mention,
Kristi Noem,
Max Blumenthal. And it look. Here's what it
says in her her tweet. Ensuring the security
of god's chosen people.
Isn't that just I mean, think about how
strange that is to say. So what about
Christians? Are they not god's chosen people? Like,
the the point means they're in you are
inherently secondary.
You it are you can't both be god's
chosen people. So if they're if what she's
saying is that Jewish people are the god's
chosen people, then that means that you're not.
Doesn't that seem weird? I'm of the mind
that people are god's chosen people, not just
Jewish people or Zionists or however you wanna
look at it. To me, that's terrifying. You're
talking about a person who is at pretending
to act in the interest of Americans. Or
even if you wanna look it from a
religious perspective, which I don't think you should,
but for Christianity,
in any way, you're talking about her ignoring
those things in the interest of Israel's interest.
And as Max says, Donald Trump has reportedly
selected Kristi Noem to serve as his DHS
secretary.
In March, she introduced a bill cracking down
on criticism of Israel on the grounds of
ensuring the security of god's chosen people.
So you're not allowed to say, I disagree
with Israel's actions in that country. Oh, you're
racist. We have to ensure we're god's chosen
people. Every one of these people he's picking
are radical prophetic Zionists who believe
what we just played for you.
I don't know how in any way that's
America first.
Trump expected to choose,
South Dakota. This is just again, this is
to show you some posted
doc article on this on Fox News, sources
say. Again, all this would is always up
in the air.
Now here she is on
Real America Voice. It says governor Kristi Noem
suggests she's setting a model for the rest
of the country after signing a strict anti
semitism hate crime bill. Hate crime. I thought
we were against hate crimes in the idea
or hate speech as Republicans. Right? I guess
not. That's the woke right, woke left.
Just because you wanna frame it a different
way, it's still an argument that you're not
allowed to say certain words that we think
are hurtful.
Well, that's not free speech then, guys. And
I'm 1st that will tell you that there's
certain things I will point out I think
you're disgusting. I say it every time. But
I will also fight for your right to
be able to say it because that's free
speech. That's what real protection that's absolute free
speech. That's what I believe in.
And it says there are approximately 400 Jews
living in South Dakota.
Deal with anti semitism. Meanwhile, Washington fumbles it.
A big one today. Right? You're gonna be
signing some historic legislation to take on the
scourge of anti semitism. Legislation. Yeah. We actually
did that just a couple of hours ago.
We signed a bill that defined what antisemitism
was. It gave And, of course, every I
can this is the same thing every time.
It has taken it straight from, I think,
like, the Holocaust Museum definition or the point
is anything conflating Zionism and Judaism
as not excuse me. Anything that says that
they're not the same thing is racism according
to them. Any criticism of Israel,
any criticism of Zionism
is antisemitism
to them.
That's that's objectively false. That is not true.
It doesn't matter how you wanna conflate these
things. What they're doing look, first of all,
even if you thought that was accurate, those
are still violations of your free speech.
Simple. There's no way around it. But on
top of that, they're conflating criticism of a
of a government and a government ideology and
a government and an and a political
entity.
That's like saying that we can't criticize Chris
Republicans without being called anti Christian. It's the
same stupid point. It's just because they've been
forcing this in for so long, but people
are waking up to it. Powerful examples that
we can use in litigation and in court
to make sure that hate crimes stop, not
just in South Dakota, but this will be
used as model logis legislation in many other
states because it is written so strong and
it was unified within the Jewish community,
within the groups that have always stood strong
with Israel, and it is something that we
will use throughout the United States of America
to make sure the anti semitism is stopped.
Good. So again,
violating your free speech. We're making sure that
we violate your free speech because of Israel.
Every single person we pointed to on Trump's
so far picks
of our of the same mind. You do
not have rights when it comes up against
Israel.
I think all of us were horrified by
what happened on October 7th. And what I
was even more horrified about after that was
the pro Hamas support that some uneducated people
in this country endorsed and wrapped their arms
around. So Oh, and of course, they cut
to a Palestinian flag because these people are
stupid. We're gonna We're very, very dishonest. This
is an opportunity not just to stop hate
crimes, but to stand with our Israel allies
and to also make sure We need our
outrage for the 800
real babies.
You know, the point is you can read
if you read what I was just reading
what that sign said. The point is that
these people are out there protesting for by
the way, a lot of different things. If
you actually listen to the different multifaceted opinions,
but very, very, very few of them
are saying they're projamas. Maybe because they don't
want you to know that, but either way,
that's not something you can tell. This is
like saying you're not allowed to believe in
I mean, you could make it about anything,
like, republicans. The point is that simply believing
in a certain thing or supporting a certain
organization
is protected. You're allowed to believe what you
want. At least that's what we tell ourselves.
But every time it bumps up against Israel,
you're not allowed to.
People like Greg Abbott passing laws that say
you're not allowed to boycott a foreign country,
or in Texas having to sign documents for
aid during a hurricane that demands that you
don't boycott Israel. These things should have been
huge red flags.
People went back to sleep.
That were pushing back on terrorist organizations who
want to destroy not just Israel, but also
the United States of America. Nope. Nope.
Either she's too stupid to know she's lying
or she's lying to you. Either way is
the clear reality
they're they're telling you Israel's agenda.
Now Jake Shields simply points out, why are
why are they the only group that gets
so many special laws?
And he says, Chris no Christy Noem, antisemitism
law, considers the language of New Testament scripture
in the bible to be illegal antisemitism.
See, there's no missing this. Now this is
a small point in the context of one
overlap to this. But you have to understand
that what they're talking about, I I I
for me, it's not about coming from a
biblical perspective. It's about highlighting that your rights
are being violated. But this is a good
point to reach the Christian right.
People that pretend like there's some kind of
connection here. What they're she's literally passing a
law that's that says you're not allowed to
they considers the language in the New Testament
to be anti Semitic. Her nomination in a
is a slap to the face of Christian
American Christians, and sadly this is what they're
writing. Sadly, many Christians don't even know that
she signed this law and what they did.
The Jerusalem Post. And they go basically, these
images go over the reality. It says, then
answered all the people and said, his blood
be on us and our children. It says,
the Jews who both killed and lord Jesus
the point is that these are things in
their discussion that says you're not allowed to
say.
They're in the bible.
Whatever you think about it, isn't that interesting?
So now you have lee lawmakers in this
country pretending to be fighting for Christianity, or
more so specifically for republican Christians,
and are creating bills that outlaw parts of
your religious text. Doesn't that worry you?
Again, I'm I'm with them. I argue that
most people don't even know that.
Ian Malcolm says, I suppose, quote, America first
means undermining American free speech to protect Jews
from honest criticism.
Now, again, to me, it's not just about
Jewish people. But either way, the point's the
same.
Maybe you hate Jewish people. I would think
you're disgusting for doing so with with the
idea that just because they're Jewish. But you
have a right to say that. You can
stand up and scream all day long. How
much you hate them? Why you hate them?
We have the right to say how we
think too, and that's all protected by free
speech.
But not today. Not with the current cabinet.
Not even with Biden's administration, you understand. They
were doing the same things.
Trump picks Kristi Noem to serve as Homeland
Security secretary
and says they announced she
is that pick who put a lawn place
equating criticism of Jewish people with holocaust denial.
Here's a clip I'll play for you of
her speaking about it. Good morning, everyone.
My name is governor Kristi Noem, and I'm
so thrilled to see all of you here
this morning. Thank you for being here to
honor such a special occasion where we sign
a bill that will define anti semitism
and how we can continue to make sure
that we're standing against acts of hatred and
standing in solidarity with our Israeli community and
the Jewish people. Now think about the context
of what you would have called hate speech
and censorship from the left.
Right?
Misgendering
somebody or whatever the things they were using.
By the way, still happening in the UK
like crazy.
I didn't mean to hear it to some
degree too. Now did you disagree with that?
I'm sure you did. And you should because
it's crazy. It's it's unconstitutional.
So why is this different?
It's it's words.
They're just words that they're choosing to say
are no longer allowed. Hate speech is not
a crime, by the way. It's there's not
that's just a that's something they've manufactured to
justify the suppression of your speech.
Now, yes, I could point out that their
hate speech is a thing you could say
exist. People are saying mean things, and I
could say I'm that's great. But the point
is choosing to be offended by these things
is completely up to you.
But even if you are offended,
laws are not created to stop you from
being offended. Free speech exists for a reason,
or rather, it's outlined and enshrined in the
constitution as an inalienable right for a reason.
I just wanna make it clear that she
is doing I mean, this might you might
as well make her speaking about pronouns and
deciding what you can say on Facebook and
social and Twitter because they don't think that's
allowed. It's the same difference. And right now
on Twitter, they're working with the ADL and
they are actively censoring a lot of this
conversation as we've proven many, many times.
Not free speech, guys. We are going to
have a few speakers to share with us
some history, some culture, some reasons that we
need to have this type of legislation, not
just here in South Dakota, but across the
country. And I'm just so honored by all
the special guests that have traveled to be
with us today. We have had guests travel
all across the United States of America and
from overseas
to be here, to be a part of
this ceremony and this bill signing. And for
me personally,
it is very very touching.
I've got friends here, I have known from
Israel that I have known for over a
decade that See, this is the weird thing
to me.
If we're talking about Jewish people, why is
it only about Israel?
Because that's the agenda.
We all know there are Jewish people that
live all over the world. There's plenty of
Jewish people that don't identify with Israel.
There's a whole it's not it's not a
very small thing. There's a lot it's not
I wouldn't say it's the majority, not even
close, but it's not some fringe idea. There's
a lot. There's huge groups in Israel, in
the UK, in the United States, Torah Judaism,
ones I often point out. But there's plenty
of the protest groups you can see, Jewish
voices for peace. They're all calling out Zionism.
And on top of that, they're calling out
the idea what most of them would argue
that hate speech is real, saying we shouldn't
be the point, nonetheless, is that it's not
about Israel and Israeli government action or the
Israeli flag with the star of David that
is a Zionist symbol. It's about Jewish people
wherever they reside.
You realize even people like,
Ethiopian Jews in Israel are treated like second
class citizens. They'll openly tell you that. Horez
has covered it a 1000 times. So that
shows you right there that it's not about
Judaism. It's about Zionism. So when she stands
up and makes this about Israel with an
Israeli flag inviting people from Israel to come
and celebrate the suppression of American speech under
the guise that you're going after anti sem
you get the point.
That is so alarming.
The open support of a foreign government in
the suppression of American speech that is undeniably
unconstitutional
about something that's about Jewish people. But even
then,
Semites are not just sem Palestinians are Semites,
and we've made this point many times, and
a lot of you have. So antisemitism
wouldn't even make sense if you were talking
about any just Jewish people because even then,
we can argue that there's a whole section
it's it's a misrepresentation
and has become just criticism against Jewish people,
which is the way it's used today.
But not Israel.
So when they conflate Israel with that or
Zionism,
the agenda is right there on the surface.
I frankly think most people can see this.
The only thing I want you to take
home is that these are American
politicians
who are passing laws that suppress your speech
and inviting foreign government entities to celebrate the
suppression of your speech.
I've worked on policy with when I was
a state legislature, when I was in Congress,
and now as governor.
To sign a bill like this into law
that will be an example to the nation
is a very powerful thing for South Dakota
to do. So I would like to open
the ceremony first by asking our rabbi, who
was our very first rabbi that the state
of South Dakota was gifted with, Rabbi Mendel
Alperwitz to come Gifted with?
I'm sure we can imagine what that means.
Come on up and to greet all of
you and share with you some thoughts, some
words, and wisdom. If you would welcome him,
please, that would be wonderful.
Now I don't see him in the clip,
but I'm willing to bet you it's a
Zionist
Israeli rabbi as opposed to a Jewish rabbi
that exists in this country. Maybe an Orthodox
Jewish rabbi, who many of which actively call
out Zionism, but you get the point. Now
let's go over some of these clips that
I think are very important. Now I've I've
rarely played all these in a row, but
I've got this thread that I keep adding
to. If you got more, send it to
me, going through the reality of Trump's explicit
stance on violating your free speech for Israel
over and over and over, or stating that
they should control congress.
There's no context issue here, guys. You can
look at the full speech. This is exactly
the context. He is speaking about something that
you might in be agree with.
Doesn't doesn't mean that it's that it's constitutional.
Just because you don't like the people who
are criticizing Israel does not mean that it's
constitutional to suppress the statements or that you
don't like people burning the American flag, does
not mean that that's somehow constitutional to put
you in jail for it. In fact, it's
the opposite.
It is absolutely constitutional, and it's been we're
roundly,
deemed constitutional by the Supreme Court.
That's a fact.
So in all of these that will show
that we are inching or rather
sprinting, goose stepping into a future where they
are going to tell you that you're not
allowed to criticize Israel,
which is already we're already there, but they're
gonna make it
policy, law, which by the way, I would
continue to tell you that just because this
law does not make it legal or constitutional,
but that's where we are. So let's go
through these.
We will remove the jihadist sympathizers
and Jew haters. We're gonna remove the Jew
haters
who do nothing to help our country. They
only want to destroy our country,
and we will never let the horrors of
October 7th be repeated here on Americans. We
will not let that happen. There's that that
that makes no sense at all. Hamas is
a Israeli funded group that exists inside of
Gaza. But, of course, if it did, then
that would mean that Israel probably made it
happen since it's an Israeli funded entity. But
either way, the point is that what they're
talking about is suppressing somebody's feelings.
The Jew haters? Well, most of the things
they're pointing at are people that support Palestine,
and we can prove that. But even if
you have a rapidly person out there just
going, Jews, I hate those Jews. Well, that
would be something that is protected to believe
and to say out loud. Now if they
acted in violence against anybody, no matter what
the word that we're saying, that would be
a crime. It's not more of a crime
because you hate somebody. It's still just a
crime. But that's the world we're in right
now. And we used to pretend that Republicans
saw that. But you see, it's always been
a ploy to get you right where you
are right now.
What he's talking about is removing people
that
have an opinion.
And on top of that, many of which
don't even have the opinion. They claim they
do, but they say that because the ADL
claimed it because of a Palestinian flag.
Shocking how obvious that is.
President of the United States will once again
stand shoulder to shoulder with the state of
Israel.
I will support Israel's right to win its
war on terror and So not stop the
war, but let them keep doing what they're
doing. We will win fast. You have to
win and you have to win fast.
When I'm president, we will deport the foreign
Jihad
sympathizers and Okay. So right there, they love
to pretend he means foreign.
But, of course, you could read it either
way. But the point is, he said in
a thousand other context, just Jew haters or
Hamas supporters. Right? But what he means is
the foreign jihad supporters.
So, again, the point is the same. If
you wanna stand up and scream that you
support ISIS, you have every right to do
that. People will say you're crazy,
but it's not a crime to feel that
way.
Okay? So this is the reality. It's just
be he's telling you that you're not allowed
to feel this way, even though we can
prove Israel funds that group, or that it
is not what they claim it is, or
that there has been a huge shift in
these things since, I mean, over the last
so many decades. And regardless, the act of
is
of legal armed resistance is what happened on
October 7th. And, yes, then they committed crimes
around that too. Both of those things exist
in the same conversation. But he's telling me
you're not allowed to support the group that
carried out a legal act of armed resistance
or the Israel funds or that is just
in any group anywhere that you're allowed to
express support for. Not in this country, but
hashtag free speech. Right? Hamas supporters from our
Mitch. It's
weird how all those Trump signs are in
blue and yellow or excuse me, blue and,
and white. Wonder why that
is. Wonder what that connection is.
Yeah. All of them. I I I see
one sign that's not blue and white at
a Trump rally. Sort of like how you
can prove they've had a lot of these
rallies with Israeli flags behind them, or Marian
Adelson introducing most of what they yeah. Totally
not what exactly what it looks like.
Israel is with us
for 1000 of years. We're not gonna let
go of it. I That's such a weird
statement.
And you know exactly where it's tapping into.
Thousand it's the prophecy. That's what he's tapping.
He knows what he's doing.
Will ban refugee settlements from terror infested areas
like the Gaza Strip.
K. You can't miss how important that one
is.
He's talking about refugees.
He's talking about the people that have been
displaced in Gaza and saying we won't allow
them to be in Gaza anymore. Well, that's
Israel's point.
As they just admitted, we were never gonna
let them come back. It's amazing how we
can say that right on the surface. And
we just add, oh, he just means the
bad guys. Well, they're talking about all of
them. And even if you think he just
means the bad guys, well, Israel is saying
they're all bad guys. So let's not pretend
like this is not about as obvious as
it gets.
Government. I will ban refugee settlements from terror
infested areas like the So you're not allowed
to have a refugee settlement in terror infested
areas, which Israel says is all of Gaza
Strip. So he's effectively saying we're not going
to allow refugees to exist in Gaza. Well,
that means Palestinians. All of them.
Anyone confused?
How is it possible that we still pretend
like this is not the most obvious thing
in the world? You guys are stripped, and
I will put every single college president on
notice. The American taxpayer will not subsidize the
creation
of terrorist sympathizers
on American soil. Okay. Again, you're not allowed
to think what you want.
It's as simple as that. Now, look, I'll
be the first to point out that it's
concerning the way that a lot of these
schools, especially through the kind of woke education
mindset, has done
influenced people in very dangerous
ways. But the bottom line is it's a
choice to send them there. It's a choice
to be engaged with that school. It's all
choice.
Speaking and learning and talking about things, no
matter how crazy and how contentious, is not
a crime.
It's obvious. Okay? So the point is to
say that you're not a we won't let
them teach these we're talking about Palestinian history.
We're talking about the reality of the illegal
occupation, the Nakba. These are things that are
provable facts. But, overall, all you're trying to
make it about is Jew hate or anti
Israel when the reality is this is about
information. That's the creation
of terrorist sympathizers.
Terror sympathizers.
So the word terrorist is obviously completely subjective.
It means whatever they want it to mean,
which is what anybody honest can point out
about left or right going back as far
as you can look.
But sympathizers, so you're not allowed to feel
that they shouldn't be attacked. You're not allowed
to say I support Hamas. That's a violation
of your free speech.
Just because you're okay with that, have the
courage to admit it. You believe in limited
speech.
On American
soil.
Now and I and I get why it's
hard to let's just say this, like, everything
you think is real. And there's just this
pressing
in, you know, issue that's about, like, that
there's a
Islam is about to influence and invade or
whatever you think is really happening.
The point is still
the principle.
Like, my point would be that you could
argue that that influence could drive them to
support the power. They're gonna use that to
manipulate our country. The point though is that
if you care about the free speech or
the the any of these in inherent rights,
that line will always be there.
Anything that you use to rationalize the erosion
of those rights is exactly the point we've
always been making.
Anybody that would give up a little liberty
for a little security deserves neither. It's always
been that way.
And there's a reason they are supposed to
be absolute.
The problem is that they've always and look.
The point is that extreme possibility is always
possibly there. We're not there, though. They're using
the threat of the things they know will
drive you to ignore your own, to ask
for them to violate your rights.
It's right on the surface.
No president has defended Israel and Jewish Americans
more than president Donald j Trump.
He declared Jerusalem the undivided
eternal capital of Israel and Which violates an
agreement Israel made with Palestinians that they've never
abided by. Moved our embassy there.
On December 6, 2017,
at my direction,
the United States finally and officially recognized
Jerusalem
as the true capital of Israel.
Today, we follow through on this recognition. So
it's embarrassing how they always love the point
that they're somehow the ones abiding by the
rules and resolutions when everything they do on
the record violates things they've already agreed to,
especially since, again, we can prove how they
have been funding the very group that they
claim is the pinnacle of their entire fight
right now. The very group we're talking about.
Law right up until October 7th and arguing
that they're the reason that how this all
has to happen or they're they support them.
They've been planted there in order to keep
this division going.
It's so sad how this stuff is so
obvious, and people still wanna pretend it's not
true. But it shows me how many dishonest
people there are out there.
And open our embassy in the historic and
sacred land of yours. Trump imposed crippling economic
sanctions on Iran, aimed to curb their nuclear
ambitions.
See, but see, how funny that is to
mention that? What does that have to do
with
See, but see, what's so funny that is
to mention that? What does that have to
do with anything? Oh, oh, I get it
because that's what Israel wants. I got it.
You see, this is meant to be a
promotional video, and they just deviate into Iran
and him stopping them
because that's what Israel wants. So if we
can't recognize how on the surface that is
and recognize the is US government acting in
ways that are clearly to the detriment of
United States
citizens for what the Israeli government wants, then
you're just not you're just simply not paying
attention. You're willfully ignorant to the facts at
hand.
Iran
is something that has been used for so
long, and it's based on so many different
lies.
Most of which simply center around the idea
that they're so bad guy that they can't
have the normal things we all have. And
if they do, that's terrorism.
Meanwhile, Israel United States carry out terrorism every
single day around the world.
And president Donald Trump brokered the Abraham Accords,
reshaping relations between Israel and much of the
Arab world. How'd that work out?
They keep they left to tout that point,
which by the way was nothing. Didn't amount
to anything. You made agreements with
regime change leaders like Cece,
which their people don't support. And that it
basically stalled,
and yet they still poked at it because
that's part of the agenda.
Donald Trump will crack down and take decisive
action against anti semitism
on the streets and college campuses.
Restore Yeah. Ignoring
your your free speech. Safety and security
for Jewish Americans.
Every college president, I say remove the encampments
immediately,
Vanquish the radicals and take back our campuses.
Vanquish the radicals?
God, people are terrifying. Okay. Next one.
Oh, actually,
hold on.
No way.
Make sure I didn't miss some of these.
Oh, that's crazy. Okay. Let me just go
through them on here because I wanna make
sure we play these.
So
this one,
that is so strange.
Sorry guys, give me 10 seconds. I just
I swear I'm I'm I'm very certain that
I grabbed all these and I'm wondering why
I don't see them in there.
Here, let me just grab the next one.
From from the clip that we're looking at.
Do it that way.
So the next one.
The next one, here we're doing this, you
can't see it there.
Is the same thing. Every one of these
clips, every single one we're gonna play, and
I'll have them all lined up before this
now since I did that already,
is showing you his exact statements in different
ways about the the
in every way, the removal of your rights
for the interest of Israel.
Kamala Harris will support unlimited
migration from terrorist hotbeds into the United States.
When I'm president,
we will deport the foreign Jihad
sympathizers, and we will deport them very quickly,
and Hamas
supporters
will be gone.
If you hate America,
if you want to eliminate Israel,
then we don't
want you in our country. We really don't
want you in our country. Think about that,
guys.
So free speech and freedom, and do and
believe what you want, accept these things. And
you can't think like this. You can't hate
America or Israel. Otherwise, we want you out
of here.
But but hashtag free speech and liberty.
I mean, you realize, guys, if we're being
not stupid about this, somebody has every right
to live in this country and and hate
everything about it.
You can you can think that's just disgusting,
ridiculous. You can laugh at them. You can
think they're hypocrites, but it's called freedom. It's,
like, it's amazing. It's the same point we'll
get through with the flag.
That's the very liberty we pretend we're all
fighting for, except we don't like it. It
just it shows a greed
inherent
hypocrisy.
And, really, when you cut to the chase
of it right now, it's about for Israel.
That's the point that we're talking about.
I will ban refugee settlements from terror infested
areas like the Gaza Strip, and we will
arrest the pro Hamas thugs who vandalize federal
property and make really life very, very difficult
in this country for a lot of people.
I will put every single college president on
notice, and we just lost another one today
from
Columbia.
Yeah. It's just so funny to me. So
we're talking about people that I argue are
absolutely
in regard to the the, like, the trans
conversation. I every same criticism.
But what's in what's what's incredible is they
were they didn't remove them then. But, of
course, then they come into the conversation of
anti semitism, and they have an honest response.
Well, there's nuance.
You're pointing it from the river to the
sea. Well, that doesn't mean what you think
it means by definition. So, yes, there's obvious
no. You should be removed. That was Stefanic
with their shaking hands, screaming about the anti
semitism push, which was proven to be false
by the ADF ADL using every Palestinian protest
from the police in front of her telling
her that that wasn't true, and she still
keeps saying it.
Right? But think about that. But so they
removed them from positions or at least they
pressured that to happen based on the fact
that they wouldn't condemn people in a in
a academia in a position of academic setting
for protesting something, and in fact, protesting on
the right side of history.
How weak, how pathetic are these people? How
weak are they? Weakness is doing what you're
doing right now, bud. Can you imagine these
people running these colleges, and they they're afraid
to say anything
even slightly negative to these groups that want
death?
The American They want death, do they? Now
what's funny is up until that last word,
I'm going, yeah. That's what was happening during
the the clear kind of, like, cancel culture
dynamic, which now the right is running with
anti semitism. The point though is that I
would have said, yes. That's crazy to watch
these these these teachers cower against the mob,
but who want death?
He just had to push it in. They
had to really push that force that Israel
first narrative that anybody supporting, I don't know,
a ceasefire,
hostage deal, 2 state solution. They want death
while Israel who's literally committing death and murder
and rape and torture. They're the ones fighting
for freedom.
Orwell, 1984. Taxpayer will not subsidize the creation
of terrorist sympathizers
on American soil. It won't happen. Colleges will
So you're not allowed to think certain things
if they don't like them.
I know it's an extreme case. I know
it's hard for people to push their mind
there, but realize that's still the same point.
I'm not saying I support people, you know,
supporting terrorist organizations, but that's my personal choice
to say I don't agree with that. It's
also
your constitutional right to be able to make
that choice for yourself.
If you commit a crime, oh, there's consequences
for that. It's as simple as that.
Lend
the anti Semitic propaganda or they will lose
their accreditation. And And again, obviously, the main
point is that most of the people they're
pointing at are not doing that. That's always
the underlying point. They're pointing at people waving
a Palestinian flag, guys. It's lazy and it's
insulting.
And even if they were supporting terrorism, that's
still their right to feel that way. It's
so crazy now. Every single last penny of
federal support.
You know, the biggest change I've seen in
congress is Israel
literally owned congress. You understand that 10 years
ago, 15 years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And to I think you know exactly
what I what I'm saying.
They had such power. Israel had such power,
and rightfully,
over Congress. You know, Israel was the most
powerful
lobby
in the country 15 years ago. Today, between
Tlaib and AOC and all of these people,
what they're doing,
Israel,
they don't have the back end that they
once had. Now the point is he keeps
saying that AOC and the rest wouldn't exist
if Israel had the control that it used
to, rightfully so.
That is chilling
right on the surface of the conversation. Here's
one here's what he said about free speech.
If you believe it, if you you think
that what he did proposes might violate free
speech, which it would, by the way, he
thinks you're
stupid. Because we're losing a lot of people
because of the Internet, and we have to
do something. We have to go see Bill
Gates and a lot of different people
that really understand what's happening. We have to
talk to them maybe in certain areas
closing that internet up in some way. Somebody
will say, oh, freedom of speech. Freedom of
speech.
These are foolish people. We have a lot
of foolish people. We have a lot of
foolish people. We've gotta maybe do something with
the internet. So here is
we said foolish.
Here's where he says in 2024
about the somebody burning the flag, which even
Ron Paul in the past has made very
clear that is protected.
Like any it's it is a protected act
despite how it may make you feel.
Took the American flag down. They were writing
Hamas on the bell outside of Union State.
Or there was a picture of somebody that
did that after the fact. Well, let's assume
that means the people that you wanna hate.
What does a Donald Trump do
if he takes office to these people on
the street?
Rarely have we seen anything like this, and
I think you should get a 1 year
jail sentence if you do anything to desecrate
the American
Desecrate. Ron Paul makes a point about that
too. That means that's a religious term, guys.
And, of course, his point to this is
unprecedented. This happens all the time in this
country and all around the world. But it,
of course, behooves him to make you think
it's unprecedented. Right now, people will say, oh,
it's unconstitutional.
Those are stupid people. Okay. So you're stupid
for knowing that's unconstitutional.
Or Trump wants you to cower away from
acknowledging that it's unconstitutional because
whatever interest there I mean, guys, it comes
down to free speech. And I whether that's
an Israeli agenda or just your government wanting
to press your rights, which is really the
point in this this exact example.
The this is the reality.
That should scare people that support this. He's
saying you're stupid for knowing that it is
unconstitutional.
That worries me. Entire world, and you have
to take it that it is a wake
up call. Get smart.
Instead, even here in America, Jewish citizens have
been forced to endure the worst outbreak
of anti Semitism in many generations.
That's the ADL talking point that is fundamentally
false, proven by even corporate media.
And so many people shockingly even deny the
attack took place. This is a new thing.
I saw it
recently where they're interviewing people. They said, well,
we don't know if there was an attack.
I don't know. Yeah. You mean all the
fakes like the flag and the the policeman
in front of her that said it never
happened. They lie about it anyway. Yes. There's
racism. Yes. It happens. But I can prove
to you 45 times already where we can
see Israeli assets actively doing these things, lying
about it, going back as far as you
wanna look.
Doing these things, lying about it, going back
as far as you wanna look. Like, what's
funny is people just tuning in think that's
so
literally, if you care enough, just type it
in.
And I'm not talking about some hypothetical thing
or some fringe blog. I'm talking about, like,
New York Times highlighting that a massage agent
was caught faking hate crimes or as far
back as you wanna look, guys. It's so
crazy how obvious it is. Now that's not
to say that everything we see today is
knowingly false, but my point is that we
have seen that. We can prove it. Over
and over and over. I've gone over all
these examples up until especially at the heated
moment during the campus protests.
They got caught lying just like Israel was
doing all through the genocide, over and over
and over and hyping lies and then getting
caught that like, just like with the Maccabi
example where they were rushing in and beating
them and showing throwing things in the middle
of the night. Then when they responded, they
would show you the video where they it's
it's just so lazy.
Or
the example of how we have a 1,000
different people standing up and supporting those protests
who, by the way, are Jewish.
I mean, the examples are endless, guys. How
many people were standing up and supporting what
was happening there? I'll I'll play the one
for the the holocaust survivor, which is it's
just amazing to me that they're telling you
this is anti Jewish and everyone hates Jews
except here's a holocaust survivor who was right
next to them.
A holocaust survivor.
My message to the brave student protesters
in America is just keep doing it. Don't
give up. We are doing exactly the same,
and in the long term, we are going
to prevail. I'm out from the beginning at
every March,
a small group of survivors
and descendants of survivors.
News. This This is from the government in
Canada. Many of us of Israeli origin, many
of us descendant from Holocaust survivors.
We feel a particular sense of responsibility
to stand up against the reprehensible crimes being
perpetrated in our name by the state of
Israel.
Hey. I mean, there's so many examples, guys,
and it's lazy to try to make this
about one thing.
It's just so terrible.
And, you know, there were people
I read many times during it would it's
beyond
it's beyond belief. You know, 15 years ago,
Israel was the strongest
lobby, if you wanna use the word lobby,
had the strongest representation of people like this.
Oops. See, we see, we left the cat
in the bag. You're not supposed to say
Israel law like, this is supposed to be
an American group lobbying for American Israeli interests.
No. It's Israel. It's Israel lobbying for American
politicians, or rather the way to write just
it's Israel bribing American politicians. They're great people,
Miriam. And even points to Miriam sitting right
there. She's not from lobbying firms. She doesn't
work for APAC. She's an oligarch. She would
listen Israeli
elitist
who's dumping money in Trump's hands, and she
just referred to lobbying. Guys, it's so effing
obvious. It's all right on the surface.
But the strongest there was if you said
something about a Jewish person or something about
Israel that was bad,
you were out of politics.
Well, look at that.
That's supposed to be a racist trope. Right?
No. It's the truth, And it's not about
Jewish people. It's about the Israeli government and
the influence over American politics.
That if you said something bad about Israel,
you were out of politics. Yeah. You're damn
right. And that's still to some degree happening
now. That's what's so alarming. That's why it's
so incredible that Trump is packing his cabinet
with Zionist
prophetic extremists.
It worries me. As I promised, I recognized
Israel's
eternal capital and opened the American embassy in
Jerusalem. Jerusalem became the capital.
I also recognized
Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights.
You know, Miriam and Sheldon
would come into the White House probably almost
more than anybody
outside of people that work there. Yep. And
they were always after. And as soon as
I give them something, always for Israel. As
soon as I give them something, they'd want
something else. I said give me a couple
of weeks, will you, please?
Wow. But I gave them the Golan Heights
and they never even asked for it. You
know, for 72 years,
they've been trying to do the Golan Heights.
Right? And,
even Sheldon didn't have the nerve, but I
said, you know what? I said So ask
yourself how that why why why were they
trying to do that? Well, because of the
the water and the resources that were there,
but also because of strategic position to bomb
down into Syria, which we've seen ever since.
It's all illegal. Everything about it. There's no
legal justification. They just stole the land like
they've been doing everywhere.
That's exactly the case. It's wild to me
how obvious all of it is. Did David
Friedman give me a quick lesson, like, 5
minutes or less on the Golan Heights? And
he did, and I said, let's do it.
Oh, great. So he asks an Israeli.
Oh, let's put the ambassador and a Zionist.
Somebody who is pro Israel.
Tell me what I'm supposed to think about
this agenda for Israel.
Oh, it's theirs, and they think it's there.
Okay. Good. Then take it. Like, there's no
you don't even have the legal justification to
do that or the legal right to give
them part of Syria.
But if you're acting in the interest of
a foreign government, at the expense of Americans,
you do whatever you want. But we got
it done in about 15 minutes. Right? Yeah.
Just like that.
Now this thread is here for you to
check out.
I'm sure we'll add more to it.
Now a a point about the cryptocurrency overlap
very quickly. Whitney pointed this out. This is
from November 9th. Altcoindaily says, just in. Cardano
founder to work with the Trump administration on
crypto policy.
And she writes, great. This guy teamed up
with heavily Epstein backed scientist, Ben Goertzel, which,
by the way, seems to be kind of
an continual overlap here, and designed a creepy
biometric digital ID system for all school trail
children in Ethiopia.
The same country where Epstein funded the AI
center run by this person to supercharge or
rather the Ben Goertzel to supercharge, quote, sustainable
and cutting edge development.
You mean, like, sustainable development goals?
It's crazy how many examples we have. And
here's this link. It's actually right here for
you. Jeffrey Epstein
Foundation helps launch artificial intelligence in Ethiopia. Here's
the actual Cardano point
saying Cardano founder Charles hot hawk husk
Hoskin
Hopkinson, excuse me, to work with Trump's administration
as a crypto adviser.
It just you know? And of course, the
response, well, just an adviser. It doesn't mean
anything. Well, of course, if it was even,
like, the brother of somebody working with Kamala
Harris, people would, oh my god, we knew
it.
It's just it's subjective, and everyone just continues
to look at this is the problem with
partisanship.
People not trapped in ideological bubbles are clearly
aware this is a problem and how many
different things we see overlapping with everything we
think we're fighting against, the digital ID, the
social credit. I mean, guys, why can't we
recognize how concerning that is?
I but, again, my my if you hopefully,
you're hearing my general point, which I think
most people in this are beginning to ask
these questions. But when I'm saying that, usually,
I'm speaking to the team sport politics.
Remember,
Derek wrote about this, the co opting of
Bitcoin,
Bitcoin not shrill, Peter Thiel, Donald Trump, and
Rumble. The reality that they're using all these
things to keep you to play. I think
they're playing you. If you've listened to how
he spoke there,
he doesn't I mean, he's making have fun
playing with your Bitcoin is what he literally
ended his speech with. Does that sound like
somebody who respects what you're trying to do?
Or the reality of not just having a
reserve currency, but an actual something that actually
challenges the currency? Nope. They're co opting everything
just like we've talking about.
Now as Kerry writes, the MAGA apologist excuse
for Trump's history of appointing
entrenched establishment figures to his his administration was
he got tricked in his first term,
which by the way is the point I'm
always making. I'm not trying to tell you
I know because I'm not stupid like the
corporate media or the mainstream alternative media, but
I know what he thinks and feels because
that's silly. But I will tell you that
I I have here's what I think will
be the outcome
and what always happens.
I always shouldn't say always. But with in
a case where I end up being right,
what I mean is when that in the
in the context like what always ends up
happening in any of these contexts is that
it there's it's the rational the rationalization of
whatever comes next.
So let's just say, you know, we point
it out and then it comes to pass.
People in the partisanship will jump in and
go, but here's why. They wouldn't let it
or he did this or here's why now
that makes sense. Whatever.
I never tried to tell you why or
why not. I simply said it wouldn't happen
to you guys. I said, no. You're wrong.
You can't see.
Again, I didn't know I'm not saying we
knew for sure. But we're in a position
right now where we can continue to see
his patch his track record, his lack of
follow through, or continuing to pick all these
people. So my point was back then, I
was saying the same thing.
Look, guys. These people are the problem, and
you guys were trying to convince us that
they know or they're the insider. You gotta
have insiders to fight the insider. Whatever the
q and a narrative was at the moment.
And that's not everybody in the movement. I'm
talking about those people.
And here we are where we can look
back and go, well, look at that. Bill
Barr, and John Bolton, and Mike Pompeo. Guess
what? They ended up being swamp creatures like
we talked about. So even if he got
tricked,
the point is the same. That's what you
tell yourself to make it make sense. I
never cared whether it was tricked or not.
I didn't care whether Trump was on I
mean, I do in a larger sense, but
at the moment, it was about the outcome.
So she says, I'm wondering what the new
excuse will be as a predictable lineup of
Bush administration, Israel first, corporate funded aligned
hacks are given top positions.
Is Trump so naive and stupid, he's getting
tricked again?
And even if you think that's the case,
shouldn't that be a reason that we don't
want him in a position of power? It
says, or was he always an establishment cog,
which is what I think, who knew exactly
what he was doing? Neither is a great
look.
And she writes, imagine
the make America great again reaction if the
CEO of this this company
were headed in a a Harris transition team.
With the special Fed status, Cantor Fitzgerald is
in the company of Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan
Securities, Bank of America Securities, and Wells Fargo.
And it says Cantor is one of only
a handful of firms that the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York has designated to act
as a market maker for federal securities, which
means acting as Uncle Sam's bond broker.
So the point is you have these overlaps
everywhere with Trump's administration that would be if
even a fraction of it was happening under
a Kamala Harris point, they would lose their
minds. But the same thing happens with Democrats
and Donald Trump or the Republicans. The idea
that you'll ignore something when it comes to
what you want and point it out even
in a fraction when it comes to criticizing
the other side. That's partisanship.
As Caitlin Johnson writes, anyone who supported Trump
on anti war grounds
already has more than enough evidence to stop
doing so.
That's if you actually care about your principles
because reality is that's not ever it's that
that ship has sailed already.
Assuming these people end up in the positions.
But my point, nonetheless, at this point, would
be that Trump has publicly endorsed them.
So right there, that shows you he's choosing
whether they happen or not, people that do
not align with what you thought he was
gonna pick. That's important.
It says if you're still supporting him after
his cabinet picks thus far, you're going to
support him no matter what
because you don't really care about peace.
She follows it up saying the only intellectually
honest reason to support Trump is because you're
a garden variety Republican,
and you support standard Republican agendas like lower
taxes for the rich and low tolerance for
human diversity. The point is not this is
post the election. Right? So now that we're
here and we see these things, that's the
argument she's making. There is no honest basis
to support Trump on anti war grounds or
because you want the swamp of corruption to
be drained from Washington. This was obvious to
anyone who paid attention the last time that
he was president. But it is glaringly obvious
now from all the warmonger swamp monsters
that he's been packing his cabinet with.
This narrative so called Make America Great Again
Republicans have about themselves as some new special
breed of Republican who are meaningfully different from
the Republicans of the past simply is not
born out of any kind of material evidence.
Something I've been saying for a while.
They're not ending wars or whatever. It says
they're not draining the swamp. They're not fighting
the deep state. They're not ending the wars.
They're not doing all the gross stuff repub
they're they're doing all the gross stuff Republicans
have always tried to do while LARPing as
brave rebels. Now whatever you think about what
Republicans have always done. The point is it's
nothing different is the point I'm making. I
just she says, I despise the entirety of
the Republican party. It's one of the most
evil things humanity has ever produced. Now I
don't necessarily agree with that. I would say
that about the government. All of it. Left
and right.
But she says, but in a sense, I
actually respect the Republicans who don't pretend to
be anything different from what they've always been.
More than I respect the frauds who pretend
they're waging some kind of populist insurgency against
the establishment.
At least the Ben Shaperos and the Fox
News weird hair pundits are honest about who
they are.
She makes a good point. Either way, I
see them all in the same boat. I
think that's important to make sure because I
mean, she clearly has a a partisan perspective
in all of this. But that's you guys
can decide. Maybe you think she's right. I
think at the end of the day, you
can prove that democrats are just as hypocritical
when it comes to the same thing in
reverse.
I don't respect the shapiro's of the world
for being disgusting because they don't they're not
honest about who they are, but they will
stand up and make the difference clear about
what they currently pretend the new direction is.
But either way,
this is where I got the image from
today. I think it's important. It's just even
just flowing in this in people's minds when
they look at the title.
This is not
it's not more unique to left or right.
It's the true nature of your government. The
same way he stood up and said, Hillary
Clinton and
Bill Clinton are good people right after he
got elections based on the idea he'd lock
her up.
How do you not recognize how crazy that
is? Of course, the qanon, trust the plan
game got people to think there was some
secret plan. That's why we didn't make a
big deal about it. How'd that work out?
How do you not realize for those that
are honest about this that you were played
by yet another
CIA whatever, misad agenda? Whatever you think the
q thing was and is still to this
day. She says, this is it. This is
the real story. This image right here. Ignore
all the fake drama, forget all the campaign
rhetoric, and and the basically, this is what's
real. This is what deserves your attention. She
says, one may say
or rather, they do not hate each other.
They do not see one another as existential
threats to the nation. They are not enemies.
They're barely even opponents. When the show is
over, they hug and kiss like boxers after
weeks of phony trash talk made solely to
sell pay per view. It's the same thing
with Clinton and the rest. Now, of course,
you can argue that it's what the bigger
man would do, which I would even agree
with,
But that's not who they are. And everything
they do shows the opposite. But what the
and that that it will still could be
part of the theater. The truth is that
at the end of the day, they're acting
in the same agendas. They're supporting Israel. They're
supporting the wars. And they'll even
walk back the you'll destroy the country points
right after one of them wins.
You can't miss what that means.
Now as Jason points out, that's why I
grabbed the image from yesterday, before the election,
America first, after the election, America last. Every
single time.
Voters never learn. This person says, well, the
effing the effing department of government efficiency will
be a good thing. See?
And this is my point.
I said, if
they do what you have interpreted their vague
statements as implying they will do,
a huge if,
so why don't we remain objective and hope
for the best, but prepare for the and
freely call out the worst?
Not a like, not a response. Of of
course not. Who cares about objectivity? And, no,
we have to pretend this will change the
world because
I hope so.
But it's crazy to respond to that with,
but, but, but, this is what they said.
Scott Ritter says, well, America, we just found
out the price of a president.
Mary Madison bought Donald Trump for a cool
$100,000,000,000.
Best investment Israel ever made. Worth worst sellout
in American history.
It's a big statement,
especially from Scott Ritter.
Now, here's the clip we played in the
beginning. I think it's good enough to play
it again, but the reality being that here
they are in Israel
doing tap do you know, dancing about how
how happy they are that these were the
ones they chose, Demonstrating that they know that
somebody maybe not blind to the supporting of
Israel
might acknowledge their genocide. Meaning that they know
the world sees what they're doing.
I think it's important to highlight this is
before all these picks, before even Marco Rubio
was officially pointed to, they were going, yay.
Mossad said, good job. Good for you.
Or any of the rest, Hagath, I believe
or Hegseth was the one where they came
out, I think, and said, look. We congratulations.
And the next day, he announced it. No.
I one of them was. Either way, multiple
examples of Israel somehow knowing before you, America.
But let's pretend like we don't know what
that means.
Kim Irvin says, Trump has now made the
country blatantly Israel first.
The metamorphosis is now complete.
APAC tracker, I'll include this for you, goes
over every one we're talking about.
It says Donald Trump's pro Israel cabinet, a
thread.
Now, these aren't, again, not technically official until
after they're put in position.
After the change of power.
Stefanik, every one of these people.
And that's the we were just showing you
a $1,000,000 for Stefanik.
Over $1,000,000 for Marco Rubio.
Lee Zeldin, almost $1,000,000, 916. Oh, that's so
that was pretty close. I was wondering if
that that's look at that. Look how close
that is. Isn't that interesting?
I kinda think there's something to that.
Michael Waltz, 235,000.
Rick Scott, 606,000.
And we went over one of the previous
shows.
Oh, here's, Kristi Noem.
I mean, you know, we've gone over all
of them already.
The point is that every single one of
them have clear examples how they are acting
in in acting for the interest of something
other than Americans.
Greg Reese will play that clip. He says
from MAGA to may Gog and Magog in
1 week. Now if you don't remember what
that is,
simply the it's the it's the prophecy and
all they're talking about. It says, Gog and
Magog are a pair of names that appear
in Hebrew bible and and and the Quran
with varying interpretations and associations,
saying, basically,
they are giants who serve as guardian spirits
of the city of London. And, basically, that
comes from the the Hebrew bible.
So here is what Greg Reese oh, one
more thing, and then he's I think right
here, yeah, he's got a clip I'm gonna
play for you, which really just kind of
overviews a lot of what we said today,
but I think it's worth playing. He says,
anyone pushing Trump at this point is a
Zionist
or the useful idiot of the Zionist agenda?
If you want to know what's coming next,
search Gog and Magog.
He's not wrong. I mean, that that that's
not gonna mean that that will come to
pass. The point is that this is what
these people believe
on the surface. That's pretty terrifying.
And as we're watching people like Alex Jones
continue to support him, I think we need
to ask,
who's being objective here?
I mean, I I I find it I
praiseworthy to point out somebody who is at
a time when he knows he's gonna get
attacked from other conservatives, taking the having the
principles to stand up and point out the
reality. Now, you can I maybe I'm wrong,
and maybe that's not the truth, and he's
wrong too? But I I think it's obvious
what the facts are.
And he is acknowledging those facts.
So how can that be wrong? How can
that be,
you know, a a a challenge to your
party when the facts are what we should
care about? Whoever the person that's what real
supporters do. If you believe in this country
and believe that we should have a state,
of course, that's important.
No. In this conversation, which I don't think
we should, the point is that you have
to acknowledge that anybody, like, even was it
Roosevelt said in the past that to blindly
support any president is servile and morally treasonable
to the American public.
Because you should be more critical.
Because they are who you think they are,
if that's the case. Right? You should be
more you they you should demand the highest
level of highest caliber from them because of
who they say they are. Or because, you
know, if you wanna pretend America is the
no the moral integrity, well, then we shouldn't
go and do the same things. We shouldn't
be killing and murdering regime change and and
responding with cluster bombs because they started it.
That means you're always been a liar. No.
That means we want better. That's why they
pretend to be better.
So I think it's important we call this
out.
So here he says, Zionist occupation
occupied government of Trump 47.
Not defeated the globalist deep state.
Oops. Not that one.
Hold on.
I don't know how I mixed all these
up.
Dang it. Where did I put that? Here
I'm just gonna save myself time and grab
it again right now. Let's do it on
the fly. We'll do it live.
Okay. So this is just I think it's
a few minutes. It's this clip
breaking down kind of the same stuff we're
talking about. And and I really a lot
of the same people you'll see, but, you
know, I think it's a good clip to
share. Include clip clip to include.
And then we're gonna play that clip for
house Jones telling you how they're stopping the
deep state and they're saving everyone's lives and
by supporting the deep state, it's killing everyone.
Okay.
Sorry, guys. Bear with me. Pretty sure I
just downloaded that.
Yeah, I don't know what's happening right now.
I think there's something.
Okay. There's something weird going on.
Yep.
That's the life we live in this technocratic
world, it seems.
There we go. Okay. Here we are.
Trump has chosen big pharma's Susie Wiles for
chief of staff, and she appears to be
Trump's handler. In charge of Trump's campaign and
his pack, arguably his closest adviser, when I
asked my friends who are close to Trump,
they say you don't get a meeting without
Trump unless she's in the room. You don't
get a phone call unless she's in the
room. She's omnipresent.
Elon Musk has been exposed
by several reporters to be a fraud and
a government front man. Nobody has ever debunked
this. And now we are told that he
will be fixing the government. I mean, my
top recommendation, honestly, would be just to have
a carbon tax. That seems so reasonable.
Yeah. I I agree. There's just one thing
that will matter. Put a price on carbon.
That would be the best option. For sure.
That seems like it'd be such a good
idea.
So far, the cabinet picks are painting a
clear picture of where this is all heading
for UN ambassador
Elise Stefanik,
who has received $917,000
from the Israel lobby.
Today, this means crushing antisemitism
at home and supplying the state of Israel
with what it needs, when it needs it
without conditions
to achieve total victory in the face of
evil. For secretary of state, senator Marco Rubio,
who has received $1,000,000
from the Israel lobby. Senator Rubio, will you
call for 6 1000? Senator
Rubio. Are you filming it? What is I
want you guys to get this. I want
them to destroy every element of Hamas they
can get their hands on. These people are
vicious animals who did horrifying crimes, and I
hope you guys post that because that's the
civilians that are being killed every day? Hamas
has stopped hiding behind civilians, putting civilians on
the way. Hamas knew that this was gonna
lead to this. So Hamas has stopped building
their military Don't you love that argument? First
of all, the human shield dynamic has been
overwhelmingly proven to be predominantly Israel if you
can prove anything happening from Hamas, which I
would never deny, but I can't see the
evidence for it. But the idea that they
knew this would happen, did you there's not
it's an it that's it's counterintuitive to their
point.
So they knew how genocidal Israel was. They
knew that they would kill all these children,
so it's their fault.
Really? Like, I can't you know what the
point is? I think that's an Israeli talking
point, so they repeat it. But it's it's
stupid. It shows you that they are the
problem.
The license underneath hospital So you don't care
that 15,000
died? You don't care about the babies that
are being killed every day? Fine. I think
it's terrible, and I think Hamas is a
100% to blame. That's what I think. Make
sure you post that, please. For the EPA,
Lee Zeldin, who has received
$916,000
from the Israel lobby. You should not be
coddling the largest state sponsor of terrorism
who calls
the United States the great Satan. They call
Israel the little Satan. They chant death to
America. They develop intercontinental
ballistic missiles, ICBMs.
Intercontinental,
that's not meant for Israel. That's meant for
us.
Right. Because
only things in the world are meant for
you. Like, okay. So that means by law
same logic that every missile the US build
that can leave the United States is meant
for Iran. Right?
I mean, it it's is it the same
it's the same logic in reverse. Why would
one work and not the other?
Because these people are children, and they don't
they think you're that stupid.
In fact, they may be stupid enough to
fall for it themselves. That's certainly possible. But
all the the death to Israel, all of
these things we've addressed a 1000 times over,
and that's all they have. You realize how
every time we have this conversation, their points
are the same even though we've gone decades
past? Weirdly, every other day, we have a
new crime committed by the US and Israel.
And every other day, they're rationalizing with the
same points they point back to their lies
about Iran or Israel Saudi Arabia or or
rather, excuse me, Syria or anybody else. Do
you realize how crazy that is? Like, where's
the new crimes being committed by the global
state sponsor of terrorism?
Where are they?
You mean the responses to other things Israel's
doing? No. No. No. Those aren't it's incredible
how clear it is when you actually are
objective and stand back and look at the
what they're saying, look at who they're pointing
at, and look at the track record of
both these countries.
These people are not just manufacturing
terrorism. They are leading it in the world
today. That is the people. And that's not
the US people. That's not even for all
of the Israeli people. But a lot of
the US and Israeli people are blinded by
these agendas and are taken by it. But
we can change that, and I'm beginning to
think the majority is flipping in our favor.
Oh, shoot.
Well, I mean, you know, it's, it's a
sense we're over 4 hours. It was gonna
so it's the same thing. The same clip
here about Huckabee,
the same clip about Rat Ratcliffe and most
of them, because these are alarming clips that
show you exactly what we're talking about. Well,
here, I'll give you some of the stuff
we haven't talked about. For the senate majority
leader, John Thune, who has received $460,000
from the Israel lobby. Not responding,
is is not an option either. I mean,
you have the the the animating force behind
the evil in that region
is Iran. And for US president Donald Trump,
who received $100,000,000
from Zionist Miriam Adelson.
Iran is not there for us. They wanna
kill us,
and the Palestinians
are taught to kill us at 2 years
old. The Palestinian And that was the recent
that was recent. That was the last one
they just did, the last rally where half
of them spoke about Israel.
That's not what he's saying about Iran is
he's rabid MEK Israel propaganda.
It's not true. If you wanna care if
you wanna know what the reality, which does
include a lot
of bad things or things I would criticize,
look at what Robert has said about it.
Look at his coverage. Or look at anybody
that has been objectively covering this with criticism
that's not directly tapping into what Israel has
been lying about their entire time. Like, how
about we recognize that there's no nuclear bomb
despite what Israel has been saying is 30
seconds away for 20 years?
Or that the I the International Atomic Energy
Agency or even the state department recently told
you that's not the truth.
But they just these politicians come up and
just repeat the same thing, and these are
people that are gonna be in positions of
power. Just wanna come and get you. I
mean, it's just absurd
the things Years old. The Palestinians wanna come
and get you. I mean, it's just absurd
the things that Giuliani said at that rally
at Madison Square Garden, but it manifests an
ideology which Donald Trump embraces
that the Palestinians should be destroyed and the
United States should pay for their destruction.
Reporting for Infowars, this is Greg Reese.
It does appear Infowars.
Right? So good on them for allowing it.
But I I think it's important to highlight
what we'll show you next.
So all that information is what we're just
covering is that these people are
as I'll just go back to what he
just said.
Anyone pushing
Trump at this point, which includes Alex Jones,
is a Zionist or the useful idiot of
the Zionist agenda.
So that's interesting.
I agree.
Here's all the clips, by the way. I'll
just include it again for free speech, but
here is what Alex Jones just put out.
So this is on 12th.
Not defeated the globalist deep state yet, but
they are in the process of realizing that
the more they push back,
the more opposition they create.
And reality is dawning on them, and they're
openly saying all over the place that they're
done.
And that's not
Is that what's happening? I mean, we're first
of all, he's not talking about Israel because
he refuses to acknowledge that Israel's a leading
part of the globalist agenda.
But where is that happening? Okay. So what
he wants you to pretend is that Trump
being selected and all the Israeli first deep
state cabinet picks are is the example to
how we're winning. And they're on the run.
Right? They're all what are we talking about?
What kind of fantasy? I don't know why
people continue to maybe he believes it. But
if you're being honest with yourself, this is
all narrative that is not is independent from
what's going on in front of us. And
I think quite frankly, we can see, as
even Greg would point out, that this is
the opposite of that. These are this is
this is the deep state. This is taking
control right in front of us.
And I'm not talking about just Israel. I'm
talking about the guiding force around all of
this, which includes Zionism, which concludes the intelligence
apparatus. This is the problem
that he wants to pretend he's fighting, and
maybe he thinks he does. You guys can
decide.
But by supporting Trump's administration and blindly pretending
like right now you've got them on their
back heel, we're about to win,
hide the fact that we are in a
dangerous position where we, I think, have the
ability to do something about this. But if
we get pacified by the idea that it's
some q n on narrative that we're about
to win and so that we let this
happen,
I'm worried for where that goes.
Genuinely worried more than I have been in
most anything we've talked about because of this
alarming
conversation about where they think the future's going,
which which includes the destruction of the very
things he thinks you're fighting for.
Them playing possum
from my research,
they are seriously
understanding
that their arrogance and their horrible worldview,
their disgusting
elitist death cult
religion.
Yeah. Just so you're clear, he's not talking
about Zionism. He's not talking about technocracy. He's
talking about the democrats. And what he built
what he paints for you as some kind
of globalist agenda through that, which by the
way is part of it.
But, I mean, I mean, I just can't
take this seriously. I it it kills me.
Here's here's what,
high impact flicks had to say about this.
Point out some serious irony and hypocrisy.
Alex Jones right now is doing a livestream
entitled
the democrat deep state system is in complete
collapse.
Alex Jones sees signs everywhere that the left
is in total panic mode and abandoning ship
while Donald Trump is filling
the swamp with
Israeli swamp things. Mhmm. You could make this
up, but why would you have to waste
the energy doing it?
Alex Jones,
you're a freaking shill.
And you could decide for yourself.
This is why I like Brian's work because
he is objective, nonpartisan.
Alright. He'll call out just as much about
left as much as right. And the point
is we are we've cut many conversations in
the past. It's the same thing. It's the
government. And it's the you it's the it's
the poise of the government to keep you
fighting yourself while they usher in a new
era of Israeli prophetic future, guys. We have
to be aware of where this goes.
And the people that seem to be either
unwilling or incapable
of pointing it out.
Now, lastly, this I just think is interesting.
Here here's a clip about
Infowars
and the so the or the point is
apparently through this oh, yeah. Oh, that what
I said earlier is the point about the
bankruptcy dynamic.
Like, it's important to recognize that whether you
think he's a part of the agenda or
the whole thing is designed to get you
to fall into a trap, it's still objective
to point out like it would be with
Assange regardless of how you think about that.
That using that dynamic was still gonna be
used to suppress our rights. Same thing here.
The going after him, even if you think
it's justified, is going to be used to
suppress other people's rights.
So I think what they're doing in this
bankruptcy, which, you know, the the law fair
dynamic and trying to take this it it
is a it's crazy to me. It's absolutely
crazy. Because even if you think he's lying
about everything, he has every right to say.
It's it's the same free speech protection you'd
apply to anybody else.
Right? I mean, that that has to right
there is important, especially somebody who I think
is even out there trying to manipulate you.
The point is that I would still stand
up to protect his right to try because
that's free speech. It's absolute free speech. But
that's why I have the right to stand
up aside of it and go, he's trying
to trick you.
Because we believe in free speech.
This is interesting because during that dynamic, which
I think is politically motivated,
the onion,
the satirical website, you can't make this up,
bought info wars at least as being reported.
And he has said himself in this clip.
Ladies and gentlemen,
it is 7:50 right now. I'm about to
upload this to x. I just got word
15 minutes ago,
that my lawyers and folks met with the
US trustee over our bankruptcy,
this morning. And they said, well, they're shutting
us down even without a court order, this
morning.
The Connecticut Democrats with The Onion Newspaper
bought us.
They asked, did they outbid? They said, well,
it was competitive. So they changed all the
bidding rules, made it secret 2 days ago.
I had a bad feeling I told you
that. And just like they tried to shut
us down back in late May without a
court order, they're supposed to have a court
order. There's gonna be injunctions filed.
I'm about to go live out of Harrison's
American Journal Studio. I don't know what's gonna
happen,
but I'm gonna be here till they come
in there and turn the lights off. I'm
a say, where's your court order?
So this is all going down right now.
They wanna silence the American people,
but we're not You know, so that this
is where I so up until that point,
like, I'm right with you. You know? Just
make demand that they do it the right
way whether you agree with them or not
or we should be a chill or not.
The point is that this, I believe, is
wrong.
But all shutting down the American people, like,
things like that make me just it's it's
that's that's quite quite hubris. It's quite the
hubris to pretend you are the American people
or that your voice is the American people.
I'm sure people love to say that.
Truth is, I think at the end of
the day, this is about making it about
the suppression of Infra wars, which is not
gonna go away. Even with the first statement
I made, which I stand by.
I personally feel this is about something very
different. Because as he's gonna go on to
argue that you're shutting down his free speech,
well, that's not that I don't that he's
speaking right now. He broadcast like, they're shutting
down a a location,
which I I would argue is still in
a line with that saying, I do think
it's politically motivated. I do think it would
be I I don't think it's about trying
to suppress what he's doing. I think they've
always used him in very clear ways,
Possibly with his involvement. But either way,
if you're going to speak, if you still
have Infowars, if you're still broadcasting, if you're
still the same point I make about with
what I'm doing, even the lawsuits we're dealing
with, I'm not gonna stop broadcasting. So I'm
not gonna be hawking about them suppressing my
free speech. I will say lawfare, though. So
I find it interesting that just like with
Israel and everything, always try to use the
free speech dynamic,
in this case, making yourself the the focus,
when that's not even really part of what's
happening. Or in this case, the bankruptcy buying
Infowars does not stop him from broadcasting and
and and having these conversations.
But, again, to be clear, as much as
I know that'll already be taken out of
context, I will stand on the point that
I think that what they're doing is wrong.
And even in some people's minds, an effort
to suppress what he's saying. But I think
we go back to the frog point or
all the things we made over the time
years. I think what they use him for
is a way to suppress people's insight, which
by the way is their own stupidity
to not look at information because they think
he said it or because they think he
talked about it. That but that's still how
it's used.
I have to be silent. Be sure to
follow me at the Alex Jones network at
a j n live,
on x right now. They're following court to
take real Alex Jones away. That's still unconstitutional.
The judge already said no. And that no.
That right there, that that's something I think
is very interesting. Now if that happens, which
I think is a very big difference on
saying it without knowing what's going on,
that would be an important step,
right, to highlight as as, violation of his
rights, as an encroachment on all of us,
which is what I'm talking about, suddenly using
this to take away, like, what would be
the logical argument of taking away his Twitter
account
through you see what I'm saying? Like, that
that is a concerning step, and you could
make the argument that that's why this is
being done,
or he's being suppressed.
Both would make sense to me. Either way,
that's very concerning. They filed in other courts.
So the live feed going up by the
time you see this at
ajmlive and at real life shows right now.
Share this everywhere. This is a total attack
on free speech. The deep state is completely
out of control. See what I mean? May
here so the deep state's out to get
out come on, guys. I mean, it just
I I think that is pretty silly and
full of hubris.
You can decide for yourself. But with what's
going on in the world to turn around
and make, you know, you like, there are
so many attacks on free speech against all
of Americans coming from the current administration that
you support, but we're gonna invert this to
be about your free speech when you're still
able to broadcast.
The private security hasn't even been told all
this yet. They tried to tell them last
time the other US trustee to shut us
down on a court order. You know, these
folks said no.
So this is all happening
right now. This is the tyranny of the
new world order desperate to silence the American
You mean the new world order new world
order that Elon Musk announced? Which one are
we talking about?
People, the mandate of Trump against all the
lawfare, they don't care. So the system still
thinks it's in charge. I'm going live right
now from what probably will be the last
transmission from this building. See, the system still
thinks it's in charge. He is making this
about Democrats versus Republicans, and I can't believe
we're still pretending like that makes sense. That
is level 1 stuff, guys. And I know
he knows different. That's what makes me convinced
that there's something else going on. God bless
you all for your support.
Please support our sponsors so we get funds
to stay on the air at the Alex
Jones network, the Alex Jones store dot com.
Take action. I need your support.
Infowars is really the detonator for this whole
global movement that's happening. Your support did that.
You're the reason it's happening. Right. He's the
catalyst.
Can't you can't ignore you can't you know,
the the the narcissism is the point is
that he this is the catalyst for all
of this that's happening. Hardly.
The blind support for Israel, the ignoring the
overlap, the support for Donald Trump, while even
people in your own have been come on.
That's alarming to me for obvious reasons. But
either way,
I find this hilarious because I think it's
funny that they're buying info wars from the
onion, satirical website, and it says, today, we
celebrate a new addition to the global
to their family, to their their LLC. Let
me say, it says I really do see
it as a family. Like much family members,
our brands are abstract nodes of wealth, interchangeable
assets for their patriarch and absorb blah blah
blah. The point here is that all, founded
in 1999,
it says Infowars has distinguished itself as an
invaluable invaluable tool for brainwashing and controlling the
masses With a shrewd mix of delusional paranoia
and dubious antiaging nutrition hacks, they strive to
make life both scarier and longer for everybody.
Commendable goal. They're a true unicorn capable of
simultaneously inspiring public support for billionaires and stoking
outrage at an inept federal state that can
assassinate JFK but can't put a man on
the moon. I think it's just as funny.
It's it's not about to me, obviously, there's
partisan angles that they want you to grab
onto. To me, I just think it's funny
because I get what the the point that's
being made there, and I would apply it
to both left and right. There's easy ways
that we get manipulated. But all I want
from everybody is to just be as objective
as possible.
Question what I'm saying. Question what he's saying.
Apply logic to it all. Come to your
own conclusions about it. But here's what Greg
Gregory said again, which I agree with. The
dark comic joke is starting to look like
the Trump that Trump
looked like Trump will start World War 3,
vindicating the brainwashed liberals and rendering the brainwashed
right into QTards.
Right? So it's as as what's been the
central point of Alex Jones every day so
far? Well, the the wrong they're gonna trick
us into going after Iran. It's gonna be
the deep state. Well,
you're not listening to what Greg is saying?
Are you looking what Israel's doing? Or you
don't want to?
Now online, as doctor Anastasia Maria Lopez points
out, how many conservative, in quotes, influencers were
paid to post this? Again, there's so many
examples like this. But she goes through and
shows you this really weird thing. This This
one says, oh my god. Angel Studios is
releasing a movie about famous anti Nazi dissident,
Bonhoeffer,
on November 22nd, and they're giving out free
tickets to anti semites.
Brilliant.
You see all of them. Here's Wall Street
Silver.
Check out this movie you should all go
check out.
And there's Ian Lyles Chong. I know you
I know I If you know any anti
Semites, Angel Studio is giving away tickets.
Guys, I mean, it's this doesn't just organically
happen within a few somebody is driving this.
With defiant l's.
All the pea pretty much everyone on the
top list of Terrible's may amazing independent media
list, which are a bunch of mainstream alternative
media.
I agree, that's pretty strange. So I what
she's trying to point out is there's a
lot of grifting going on or a lot
of influence,
which I bet you most of them don't
even care where it comes from. Just like
we saw with the what it was that
what was it called? Tenant or something like
that.
Lastly,
free prince says, hate to break it to
you, but it's highly likely that Trump was
ushered in to make the new technocratic biometric
surveillance digital ID, digital currency system palatable to
the very people most likely to resist it.
That's what we've been talking about for a
while. The anti establishment image, the populist rhetoric,
it's the perfect disguise to slip a digital
prison past those who should be more vigilant.
They didn't need a left wing authoritarian to
push this. They needed someone who could make
the right embrace it willingly.
Don't be fooled, please, for the love of
god, don't be fooled. He says, look no
further than dismissive replies to this post from
the people who would otherwise see conspiracies everywhere
else.
They've been conditioned not to question the one
who has been presented to them as the
savior, and it's working.
100%.
Now as always, you can find examples of
that on the left as well. But right
now, I agree with him.
The right
of the illusion of it all is the
part that's driving this forward. Just like I
thought with Trump and COVID 19, he's the
perfect choice to pacify who would be the
most resistant.
To me,
I've never seen something so obvious.
I think a lot of the things we've
talked about have been it's been increasingly which
I think is a demonstration of how they're
losing their influence. I mean, what whoever thought
we would see this conversation with about Israel
and Zionism and the reality of the history?
I mean, it it just it something has
shifted.
And I think we people like all many
of the people we talked about today,
their their hair is on fire trying to
rationalize the narrative or trying to get you
to die to fall back into line. I
don't think it's gonna happen. So the question
is how quickly they can rush us into
this next step before we all recognize where
we are. Hopefully,
you're seeing it right now. So speak up.
Have the courage to follow your principles, what
you believe in. And, you know, and I'm
not saying that has to be not Trump.
You can decide for yourself. But when you
see the choices that, you could even in
your mind, like I've said in the past,
maybe Trump's being tricked. Certainly possible.
I I don't I don't know why that
makes it any better, but I get why
that can certainly be possible. And so you
can pretend that he got fooled, but it
would still be the the honest thing to
point out why these choices are not what
everybody said was gonna happen and why you
disagree with them. Why that's not America first,
which I see a lot of conservatives finding
the courage to say. So good on you
for being honest and standing by your integrity
or standing by your principles. That is integrity.
And I'm glad to see more of it
today because it's a dying thing when it
comes to the mainstream alternative media circles.
So thank you for tuning in, continuing to
support this platform.
I've Over the next show we're going to
do, it's gonna be getting back to some
foreign policy and what's been going on because
it hasn't stopped, guys. I just thought this
was a really important focus for us to
have and we're gonna I'm not gonna stop
following up on this. Because like what anybody
should be doing now that we're past the
whole Trump versus Kamala dynamic is being critical
of the power structure. Isn't that what we're
all supposed to do? That's my see, this
is my point about the Tim Pool or
Tucker or the rest,
endorsing candidates. Well, doesn't that show you that
they're going to be blinded by whether by
choice or by support? They're gonna ignore certain
things. They're gonna they've taken a side.
So as we go forward, as they report
on it, I'm willing to bet you you
won't get the full picture, which is what
we're always showing you about the fake independent
media. But you can make your own choice
up about that. But I think what's important
now that we're in this phase to hold
their feet to the fire, not because you
hate them, but because you support them.
That's where we all should be.
Thank you for being here, guys. I love
you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.