Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent
news as we see it from the last
24 hours.
Tuesday, October 29th 2024.
Thank you for joining me. Lot to follow-up
on, a lot to catch up on, especially
around the Middle East foreign policy conversation
as over the last couple of days,
what's been developing around Iran and Israel is
is fascinating.
It's interesting to see how it's been covered
and who has been covering
based on what's, in most context, coming from
both directions,
simply what their side is reporting. And it's
always, as always, somewhere in the middle. But
it does appear that the back and forth,
as we've discussed from Iran's perspective is
almost and and this is just my opinion.
But as if Israel
wanted this to sort of fall, not because
I think they wanna avoid the conflict, but
because they recognize that they're failing in this
endeavor and wanted to sort of pull back
from this for the moment. That's just my
personal opinion on the way that it went
down. We're gonna get into that to start
around how Israel just attacked Iran and Iran's
response within it. Now it does seem that
it more will be coming.
But it's interesting to see that I I
I wanted to start with this because I
I this is something that usually gets hyped
around,
and, obviously, for clear reasons,
driving towards World War 3, another another major
war on the on the horizon.
But the way I read this is a
little bit different. And so I wanted to
say that early to make sure we kind
of appease or, not appease, but,
assuage people's concerns there.
And I think it's interesting the way that
right out of the gate. And if you
remember, on our last show, we were live
when that happened. That immediately, we started looking
at the broad picture. We started considering both,
you know, a lot of the different narratives
on Twitter, and it immediately turned out that
there were already people lying about what was
happening. Already misrepresenting the the locations that were
bombed, the explosions that were shown, even though
the attack did does appear to be real.
And so I'm gonna I'm gonna I wanted
that point to say early, but I'm gonna
actually end with a point today, bringing it
all kinda back around to how all this
interconnects,
about why it's so important that we recognize
how prolific that is
on every in every part of this conversation.
Because we're gonna make a huge discussion today
or make a big point around the 2
party illusion as we have been. Obviously, as
I told you over the months, as we
get closer to the election, it's more and
more necessary to make sure we reach people
with these conversations.
But that even during honest or rather truthful
events,
or rather something you know, things that are
actually happening,
you will find people that will deliberately lie
on top of these things for a thousand
different reasons. And some of them are genuinely
for larger agendas,
and some of them just want clicks and
shares. But it's important that we recognize that
and don't just take at face value what
works for what we think is happening.
And I'm really more so speaking to people
that are straddling the
partisan lines. I think most of you in
this conversation at least try to steel yourself
against these things because of why wouldn't you?
I mean, why else would you be in
this conversation unless you care about the truth?
I mean, some of these people in the
larger field today, I don't think that happens
much here because
this doesn't seem to be the same kind
of content, but lean into this stuff like
it's entertainment.
You like to see and and the bombastic
claims and the different, you know, theories, which
are all part of this conversation, but it's
important to wreck not the bombastic claims, but
to recognize that there are people out there
that really, really lean into that and really
want to make it as and I have
points. I don't need to give you names.
I'm sure some of them pop into your
minds right now. And it really does blow
me away how much you know, there's some
of them out there with a 1000000 followers
on many different platforms. And it's you watch
their breakdown,
and it it is complete conjecture. There's no
data. There's no source material. It's just kind
of lobbing back and forth between a bunch
of random claims and video clips, and then
it's over. And it didn't even really reach
the point of the title, and yet people
still I mean, to me, it seems to
be wildly artificial, if not completely fake, and
goes to the bigger picture of why all
of this might be happening to drive us
in like, the idea of how much we
deal with is actually false. Like the idea
with Internet today, we should know it's not
a secret.
And this is based on all sorts of
different estimations and different reports from different political
standings that at any point in time, like
half the Internet today, half are are are
bots. Some of them benign, just doing little
functions that aren't necessarily driving certain opinions, but
a lot of it is false. I think
on Twitter, it's far, far, far more than
that, which I think we're all kind of
aware of. And to think about what that
means, how much of this conversation, if not
all of it. I don't think that, but
to consider all of the how far it
could go is completely artificial. That it's possible
that all of us are back here with
the same opinion and are convinced like with
COVID 19 that we were the one that
didn't see it or not that we didn't
see it, but that we were alone. That
we did see it. A lot of people
we tried to reach. Remember, we made those
bracelets. You are not alone. Because people were
convinced that they were the only one. Because
the media and the mainstream alternative media just
hovered over the conversation, forcing you to think
that.
When the reality is, I hope we can
look back and see that you were the
majority.
By far, and it was not partisan. And
so this conversation of the election, 2 party
illusion, foreign policy, everything is overwhelmed with this
right now. What's interesting is the
people voting,
believing that they're gonna make a difference. And
if you believe that, I support you as
long as you believe in who you're voting
for. I think it's obvious it has no
effect if it ever did. I believe voting
is paramount that an actual representative government, if
we want that system, which I don't. I
hope that makes sense.
The point being that there's a lot of
people that are engaging with this because they
genuinely don't know what else to do. And
I think that right now, with how dishonest
it all is,
it pushes people into trying to fall back
into the system. And there's so much dishonesty
around every dynamic of what we're talking about.
And it goes across the entire conversation, and
a lot of them are convinced that
this is so important
that even if I don't like either of
them, I have to make a choice because
this is more important than it's ever been,
which if you remember is the thing they
say almost every single time. Pretty much the
every single time. But that they are convinced
that this is some kind of pinnacle moment.
What's interesting is it is,
but not the election selection process. But I
think the larger dynamic around what's happening, the
kind of
destruction of the 2 party illusion, the the
dynamic that's happening, the control, the influence of
the US government in the west, the failing
dynamic of Zionism and how that's being exposed
around the world, There is something teetering on
this right now, and I think the drive
to make that the election focus as opposed
to that is is the whole point. So
you're picking up on something. There is something
crazy happening.
It's just not the
technocrat
Zionist versus the technocrat Zionist, which is what
this actually represents. And we're gonna make a
whole point about that today. But we're gonna
start with foreign policy because I think it's
very important that we don't lose sight of
what's going on there. I I mean, even
if this was everything you thought it was
in this selection,
objectively, from a human perspective, what's going on
in the foreign in the Middle East, especially
since it's your tax dollars and in your
name and your government, primarily
70 something percent of the funding.
Obviously, it's our dis responsibility as Americans to
point this out, but objectively,
a more important thing happening in the world.
That's not to say you should have to
care more, but let's not pretend like this
in and of itself is more important than
everything else that's going on, especially because of
what we are our government is doing in
our name. But then you recognize, at least
I do, that it's illegitimate, that the
dynamic of voting in itself has been stolen
from you, that all of these things are
not there, then absolutely far more. But all
I'm asking is people consider that these things
are valid,
very important. Human life matters no matter where
it's being,
no no matter where in the world.
On top of that, that it is,
no matter what we wanna talk about, a
central part of this selection.
Right now, as I've known a po point
about in the the recent Trump,
rally,
We're being told like, I see Kim Iverson
get this lot on on Twitter that, you
know, why are you only focusing on this?
What's why there's other things in the world
besides Israel.
And then you go to their rally,
and most of the people at the rally
for a Republican side are telling you why
Israel's important. So how do you explain that?
How can how do we reconcile the argument
that most of their conversation seems to swirl
around Israel, immigration, and foreign policy, yet then
when we talk about it, we're told that's
the least important. We need to look back
over here where they're telling us to look
to Israel.
I mean, there's so many of those blatant
logical cont contradictions
that I just don't know why everybody, and
maybe they do, can't fully see it. So
let's start with that. Oh, actually, before we
jump into everything, I wanted to make sure
I shout this out again. Seeing as how
on the first I will be at this
event.
I wanna make sure you guys have the
links, these will be included. I actually just
added them last so I believe it'll be
at the very bottom of the links section
but these are these are at the top
of my posted information and every video that's
out there right now so make sure you
check that out. But this is for the
Liberty on the Rocks event,
Liber the Voluntarism Conference 2024.
Now, if you remember, this is going to
be on this web page on TLav
and this very spot right here is where
I'm gonna be streaming my all day coverage
kind of side interview,
crowd discussions, different points, as well as just
my content throughout the day, clips from interviews,
or maybe just if we have a break
between what's going on, just discussing what's going
on in the world. So this will be
entirely TLav
produced rather,
live streamed
section of it for the conference. And so
we'll be interviewing them as they come off
the stage, talking with them. I'll be hosting
a panel at the end and a lot
of different stuff going on. But that the
reason I say it like that is because
the event itself is here, which you can
check out and everything. The information for being
a part of it for whether you wanna
be there all 3 days just for the
conference itself or or just online. You can
check it out through here just to make
sure you guys see those are 2 separate
things even though they're both happening at the
event. And they're really it's just about trying
to maximize
understanding and and and
insight into this larger point. Because all we're
this is really about
understanding this and why it's important as we
come into the illusion of authority
and the the jingoism and the all the
craziness that happens around this illegitimate process. And
this comes from perspective of why we should
ever eat whether or not you believe the
election is is legitimate or the voting is
actually happening,
that you should ever want
to
choose your ruler.
You can call them representatives, you can call
it whatever you want. Larkin Rosen had a
great conversation about this, you should check out
his work. The idea of the illusion of
authority and why we should even be asking
for somebody to dictate what we can and
can't do. Because there's some kind of guide
or, you know, the the laws of the
land, all these different things that we talk
about that are ultimately, as we have seen
throughout history, used to keep you under control,
less free,
lacking liberty under the guise that we have
to because that's what society dictates.
Now it's a very hard sell for people
that have just unwilling to consider the reality
that just because there is no I mean,
whatever you wanna call it. Like, there's not
there's no the same point about anarchism.
It's not about no rulers. It's about no
it's not about no rules. It's about no
rulers.
There are always, guys, rules, let's say, guiding
principles.
There's not always something that says if you
don't do if you do this or do
it not the way we like, that we're
gonna put you in a cage or
shoot you or hurt you via violence, which
is ultimately the way our system works. Most
again, people that don't wanna hear this, it'll
sound ludicrous. But you have to understand that
there is obvious points to make about why
we are in a structure even if you
believe in the core idea that somehow there
is an authority that we should be listening
to,
that people use that.
And we are at a point now we
are so far away from any this is
why I straddle the idea of believing
in something like the constitution, believing in the
ideals that began this country.
Just because I have a different vision on
how everything should go doesn't mean I can't
see the virtue in what we currently have
versus a lot of other things. So my
point is I would personally choose something that
has nothing to do with voting or representatives
or any kind of government control over your
life. However, in a situation we have, I
can understand that the idea of the constitution
is something I had the I asked this
about Tillark and Rose because it's certainly possible
there are people out there that would say
that I am missing something, that I am
naive. And that's very they very well may
be right. But I wanted to be clear
that I have that mindset,
but nonetheless will fight to the to show
to let to hope that people can see
why the constitution, if we're stuck with this
system, is something that is being used to
help us
carve out the maximum amount of liberty possible
or something like that. And I think it's
very important to understand that because I've talked
about the constitution a lot. And the more
I grow into this, the more I understand
these different things, the more I evolve my
own opinion,
the more I become it becomes clear to
me why this idea is so important. One
of the reasons why I'm going to this
conference, because it's fair I as I've said
even in my recent interview with Howard, I'm
gonna play, tomorrow most likely, is that I,
you know, I've I don't like to label
myself. I don't like to make it about
one thing or the other because I personally
find that to be part of the problem.
But I think these I the idea of
volunteerism, the idea of agorism, anarchy in itself,
that's not chaos because that's not what it
means, but the idea of living in a
society where we have no rulers,
definite structure and rules, and realize that without
all those things, the same exact dynamic keeps
going.
Every single thing you're living with right now,
save for the government regulation control influence and
overarching hand, is all still you.
Who's gonna build the roads?
You are. And the person who owns that
company and no longer is controlled by the
government. And maybe that'll change some of the
way they do it. Maybe things will be
less safe. Or the point is that over
time in that dynamic, the reality is these
things can build to a point to where,
you know, a real free market would exist.
And somebody who builds bad things because they
wanna save money will end up not getting
the next contract. The point is it's always
down to us still. Now all that is
just to start with the point that I
think we need to think outside the box
when it comes to a situation as we
go through today is pretty embarrassing.
Like, it is it's it's cringe worthy to
watch the level of low,
lowest common denominator,
childish jingoism about the idea that he's gonna
do all the good things. Oh, and how
is he gonna do that? Well, he's because
because he's gonna he's gonna make it better
for us because Trump said, and we trust
him. He's a good man. I mean, okay.
Maybe.
But isn't that a little naive?
Or or the left with Kamala Harris acting
like she's any better despite how
ridiculously,
just almost cartoonishly bad from what she even
was before she has become during the last
couple of months. Showing you
complete
contradiction. She's talking with fake accents, like, really,
really stupid things that I think are designed
to draw people into another camp.
But we should be realizing they're both Zionist,
they're both technocrats, or at least funded by
both, and that's the same dynamic.
But overall, both sides are stuck in this
trap. Both sides are convincing themselves that that's
the only thing that they have when there's
a world of options out there that we've
gone through despite the one line response on
Twitter that say, okay. Then what should we
do? Well, listen to or a a 240
character dynamic is not gonna explain the reality
of the thousands of different things we've discussed.
And we have gone over them on the
show many many times.
So I'll include these for you. Make sure
you check it out. It'll be a good
time. So let's start with foreign policy.
And I really wanna stress that all that
I just went
over, all of this comes back around. Because
if we can't see by now, especially with
the rally you just saw with all these
neocons screaming about fighting jihad, that we're right
back in square 1 when your current dynamic
is literally driving you to more foreign policy.
Like, recognize that these things are interconnected.
Recognize how they really don't want you making
that point.
But so I wanted to make sure I
saw this too that I pointed this out
anyway. Today in general, which by the way,
I could do almost every single day, I
wanna make a real big point to highlight
antiwar.com.
Just one of the best genu like, it's
not, you know, it by design. Not flashy.
There's not all it's it's just factual information
with great research and excellent editorial bra like,
thi this is quality information.
And I always highlight, I always point them
out. I just wanna make a really big
point today to make sure that if you're
not following antiwar.com, if you're not looking at
their content, or following them on Twitter, or
looking their aspects, their tangential work, you're missing
out. Because it is on point. And it's
not just because I agree with them, it's
because they are very, very factual it's it's
about fact based information. And of course, we
could all be wrong from time to time.
That's why you should question everything and come
to your own conclusions. But here's their website
in general if you wanna check it out.
I'm only saying that because I'm I decided
there were so many different things that I
I was gonna cover that I'm I I
looked on their main page and I'm like
look at that, they got 90% that's on
there. So I wanted to make sure instead
of some other website that I was using
them to highlight the work today. Just so
you can see why they're so prevalent in
the conversation today.
But starting with the Iran point,
this was the page we had up from
last time live while this started happening and
some on the chat said, oh my gosh,
they're bombing Iran.
And so sure enough, it did appear that
something had happened. But as I said before,
we quickly saw that there was already misinformation
flying everywhere.
But this just ended here, I thought was
interesting. So Israel's strike on Iran kills 4
soldiers. That's where the BBC followed up. But
I found this interesting. They actually put this
up as the ending point from the 26th.
Iran says it has right to defend itself
after Israel strikes kill soldiers.
Which is just funny to me because I
I honestly don't think that's Iran playing the
game. I think that's them almost making fun
of this stupid nature. Because, obviously, they don't
think that.
Despite how there's literally no difference between what
they're talking about or even Matt Miller being
forced to say that, no, they don't have
a right to defend themselves because or actually,
I think that was Patel, but that they're
they're terrorists because we named them that. Therefore,
no right to defend themselves. Everyone's got a
right to defend themselves. And when they get
pushed to point out, they go, no, except
they're wrong, though, because they're bad.
I mean, it's just kindergarten level. Dumb lie.
There's no logic at all. It's it's just
simply, we don't like them, therefore, it does
not apply. Oh, so you make the rules.
Except we don't wanna be the policeman of
the world, except, you know, round and round
we go. The bottom line is that if
you're gonna make it about a logical legal
point that everything Israel is doing under the
guise of self defense for a year plus
obviously would apply here. So they're saying, we
have a right to defend ourselves. And the
point is they come out and immediately show
their hand by saying, you can't do that
because de
escalation. Make sure you do escalate. Well, where
were all where was all of that after
Iran's attack? Because you realize the moment
the moment Israel fight attacks,
it all it all spins up. Oh, the
state department, everyone goes, oh my god. We
stress the escalation. Iran, don't do anything. Here's
your opportunity.
Okay. Well, after Iran
attacked
Israel in response
the last time,
and in fact and I'm gonna go over
this very clearly yet again, and this reason
Jeremy Laffredo was taken and so on was
because they did not bomb anything but military
targets despite the lies, and that's been proven
now even by corporate media. Even by Israel
admitting it because it works for them now,
not a single person, not even military was
killed. Not one.
Think about how crazy that is with the
response of Israel that seems to belligerently kill
as many people as possible every time when
they call that precise.
It's pretty embarrassing.
And so why didn't the US stand up
after Iran?
Precision targeted military targets, and even warn them
beforehand and they still got through because they
they clearly wanted to deescalate.
Why didn't the US stand up and go,
Israel, don't do anything. That would be an
escalation. Please deescalate because that would be irresponsible.
Because they're hypocrites.
I don't need to sell you on this.
I just think it's worthy of pointing out
for somebody that didn't connect that dot or
maybe new to the conversation.
That's called
being a hypocrite. That's inconsistency.
And if you're of the mind did as
well, it doesn't apply because Ron Badguy. Well,
then you're a child. Because that's not how
international politics, that's not how the law works.
But again, I I forgive you seeing as
how both sides of the conversation wanted you
to believe that your rights only apply when
they tell you they do. We'll take away
your free speech. That's not how it works,
ladies and gentlemen. But it does appear this
happened. So antiwar.com,
Iran says Israel's attack killed 4 Iranian soldiers,
damaging the radar systems. This is coming from
Iran.
Right? So they're admitting that there was some
damage. They're admitting that ultimately there was people
killed. But it seems by and large,
coming from not just Iranian sources, but kind
of a kind of a scattering of a
scattering of different,
people covering this conversation. And I'll show you
one that's pretty much mainstream media. It does
appear that Iran
predominantly stopped what they did.
But again, it's kind of irrelevant at this
point
because it's all about the way they present
it. And I don't mean that it's obviously
relevant to know what actually happened, but I
mean in the context of how it continues.
It's a game of narratives.
So at this point, Israel from their perspective
attacked and won. And we're strong. And you
guys are weak. And we have one up
on you despite the fact that the whole
game is about trying to deescalate as the
US is presenting it as Israel protect you
know, we had a right to defend and
now we're done. Right? Well, if that was
any in any way true, you would not
be poking them after the fact and making
it out to be that you somehow had
one up on them. You were trying to
take a benefit from it while hoping that
they are the bigger man and the adult
in the room, which
not good guy, bad guy, but the reality
is they often show themselves to be the
one that decides to take it. Let's say,
well, fine. You could pretend you're the big
even though it's obvious that you are floundering
around, we'll pretend you got us. Can we
deescalate now? And then eventually Iran and Israel
attacks anyway. This how it continues to go
on. Or assassinates a scientist or she carries
out operations through the US government. Constant.
But it says they were launched Saturday morning,
killing 4. The Iranian army said in a
statement that the soldiers lost their lives, quote,
while confronting the projectiles of the criminal Zionist
regime in order to safeguard the security of
Iran and prevent armed Iranian national and nation
interests.
Does not appear that there was any kind
of civilian
fallout
for soldiers.
Of course, just like I said, here's the
US government. This is as of 26th.
US calls for de escalation as Iran claims
right to self defense. Claims
in quotes.
This is just so transparently stupid. If if
if it applies, it applies. You can't just
keep pretend, like, well, they claim it. Well,
when they don't say Israel claims they have
a right to self you just come out
and say it aggressively. Headline is Israel has
a right to defend itself.
It's just silly. After Israeli strikes. Yeah. Well,
that's obviously I mean, by definition,
the of theirs, of course, this would be
self this would be the response. Right? They
literally after Israeli strikes. But it's funny as
they they work themselves into a pretzel to
try to make the argument that this somehow
attacked by Iran. It's it's sad. And get
get understand, guys. This is the that NBC,
MSNBC,
Fox CNN, all of them, which just continues
to show you despite the aggressive opportunism,
which does get some kinda kickback from Israel,
where they'll come out and cover
3% of the genocide, which is shocking to
most people. Israel hates them for it, but
then they fall right back into line when
it's necessary. And you just have to make
sure you see that. This I don't think
any of these people care about the, ultimately,
the truth.
Now this is Reuters from, this is from
yesterday. Iran says it will, quote, use all
available tools to respond to Israel's attacks. Now
that very well could be exactly what they're
doing. It wouldn't surprise me seeing as how
if you really wanna go back let's just
take October 7 forward, seeing as how Israel
wants you to believe the world started on
that day.
Well, from that moment forward, you can clearly
see who start who attacked first in quotes.
Because obviously, this has been going on a
lot longer than that, well, before even operation
Ajax. But the reality being, which is the
illegal regime change when they put the Shaw
in place in seventies, 9, I believe, when
they took it back, so that re Iranian,
revolution.
The point is that it's not hard to
see that Israel is the instigator here. Even
based on their own dynamic. But it's hard
to you can go back as far as
you want and try to make it something
different. The point is not about that, is
that but that Iran
would arguably be see if you wanna be
objective about it, argue that they feel like
they should have a right to respond to
this. Not like that should matter in this
case. My point is that Iran,
I'm gonna argue, is likely going to let
this lie. That's the that's the instinct that
I get based on what they've done before
because this is embarrassing for Israel, the way
this is going, the multi front war. Right?
This this will there's just it's not sustainable.
What Israel's involved in right now without the
overwhelming
support, which is already there, of the United
States, and even then they're still failing, they're
I don't see how this is a likely
positive outcome for them. So this looks meek,
especially since the information's now come out where
it seems like they did not really get
through, and I'll show you that. So to
me, this is about s keeping the threat
as opposed to actually following through with the
attack. We'll wait and see.
Now here is, the j deputy coordinator of
the IRGC for the Iranian military, the the
guard. It says, you will see in the
coming days that more crushing blows will be
inflicted on the Zionist regime, and the Zionists
will be surprised by new measures and initiatives
that will suffer bigger defeats. So again, this
is just my opinion. I get the sense
that they're not talking about a direct attack
from Iran, but a multiple
different dynamics
encroach because right now, what we have to
see, and we're gonna get into Lebanon in
a minute,
that multiple times now, Israel and I'm well
before October 7th also, by the way. But
so post October 7th and the beginning of
the real aspect of the Lebanon engagement from
Israel, they failed repeatedly.
At least twice, I've seen an engagement on
the ground where they were embarrassed.
Last time last one, I heard 8 plus
or people were killed on Israel's side, and
now they basically pulled back. And now guess
what? Now we're back in the idea of
a negotiation.
Like, all in this is just a quick
succession, which I don't believe is honest. We'll
get to that in a second. But it
just shows you how quickly things can shift.
To me, this is about the recognition of
that and the idea that you're in Lebanon
and Syria and even Iraq if you wanna
bring it in, and Palestine,
and many others in this, you that are
let's be clear, this is not picking on
Israel or some kind of war against Israel.
This is about the reality that they are
fighting for Palestinian self determination.
Now, of course, they could be fighting for
in some other dynamic, but that's their stated
intention.
Of course, they could be lying.
But other than narratives coming from a group
that's lied about everything since the start of
this, it seems that's all we had to
go on. On top of the fact that
they've said many times that they will pull
back should Israel stop their engagement on on
Palestine. And even showing indications in that when
they thought that, for example, Nasrallah
and the whole way that went down, the
only reason that happened is because they were
under the impression
that Israel was going to negotiate. God knows
why.
And ultimately, that's why they did not immediately
respond, which dragged out their response, which is
why the media pretends that it wasn't a
response, but rather an attack. It's a very
delicate game and it's all pretty flimsy.
This to me indicates that they will continue
what's been going on. I mean, you could
really I mean, this is the only problem
to understand that there's any, I argue,
pressure to act quickly. It's because every moment
that nothing happens, more people are being slaughtered
in Lebanon, in Gaza. So there is a
level of, like, what but strategically
speaking, you should like, taking the human element
out of it, which we can't, but just
for the sake of conversation,
you could realistically just wait.
Israel will fall apart in all of this
because they are losing ground.
They are losing influence. The world sees what
they're doing. The US is even starting to
pull back. But that's not a necessarily a
long solution. But I'm saying simply that I
think that's what this ultimately amounts to.
Again, all my opinion. Now, of course, as
you've seen, as usual, the US and the
UK are alone in expressing support for Israel's
strike on Iran,
which this is not new. For some, it
may seem that way. This is the cradle
covering this for the podcast. The reality is
that this has been for a while now,
despite the Western, like, desperate presentation from all
the desperate people blindly supporting Israel,
that everyone in the world no. Not even
the entire west supports Israel. It's basically the
US and the UK
driving, threatening, coercing most everybody else. So there's
the different holdouts. But the world around, it's
very easy to see, are ab adamantly against
what Israel's doing. Whether that's because of opportunism
or because they genuinely care about genocide, it
doesn't matter at this point because, ultimately, they
have lost that influence
everywhere. This is again why I said this
in the first couple of weeks. They have
lost the information war. That was obvious to
me right out of the gate because of
how blindly they went at this and woke
up everybody.
Many, many, many people that would have otherwise
to the death blindly supported Israel who are
now
overburdened with death images of dead children everywhere
they look. They just can't ignore that.
Now even Horetz, on 27th, wrote an article
entitled Iran is Striving for Regional Strategic Achievements,
Not an Exchange
of blows with Israel.
Now, of course, you get into it, it's
always framed as sort of Iran is the
undermining secret. But the point is, it's interesting
that even Horetz,
highlighting, look, this is not about the evil
villain Iran trying to murder Jews. It's about
the idea that they're trying to genuinely seek
some kind of strategic advancement.
Now, of course, Israel would wanna frame that
as a nuclear weapon or overthrowing of the
countries, but there is zero evidence to back
that up. And even the US and the
IAEA
have stated recently that they're not doing that.
And I don't see any indication that they're
toppling countries around the world. I can see
a lot of that for Israel and United
States. Currently illegally occupying more than one location.
It takes a special kind of willful ignorance
to not recognize that.
Now here's what the US politicians had to
say.
Now this this is a correspondent rather, but
nonetheless, these are the the US sent perspective
of
how you know, and she's she's citing a
spokesman for the White House. But the point
is that, ultimately,
just this blind support in the midst of
everything we keep seeing. And this this is
the White House spo national security spokesman says,
we understand
that Israel is conducting targeted strikes against military
targets in Iran as an exercise of self
defense. That's just lazy.
And in response to Iran's ballistic missile attack,
which by the way was a response to
the assassination
of Hezbollah. And it says, we would refer
you to the Israeli government for more information
on their operation.
Or yeah. Rightly so. Or welder. Pong. Face
pong.
It it says I mean, it look. Here's
what's crazy about this. This is the same
thing I keep saying about the 2 party
illusion dynamic. Is I mean, you can come
out and say we support what they're doing,
but this this just childish
telling you the sky is, you know, whatever.
That that they're you can try you could
I always say that in the sky color
thing, it doesn't all all fly. The sky
is, you know, black or whatever. Something that
shouldn't be. Or telling you that something is
what it isn't. And everybody can see it,
like, you can look at this and go,
okay. Well, that's not really the case. I
mean, we all know this has been going
back and forth. But they just had they
can't resist it. Be either because they're being
coerced too from some other entity, or they
just
feel the need to lie. This is my
point about the Iran point in the first
place, where the attack happened and it was
immediately pretty, self apparent,
And, nonetheless, they still had to share fake
images of exploding because they couldn't just be
okay with the fact that they got the
attack in. They have to make it out
to be something bigger which shows you ultimately
a failure. Ultimately, it shows you insecurity,
desperation.
And so it's the same thing here. Just
come out and say we support that because
Iran bad guy. I mean, we all know
that, but yet they have to drive it
a little bit further. It's just sad.
Again, I genuinely think it speaks to desperation.
It speaks to a lack of influence.
Here
is mister John Fetterman, which, again, it's just,
you know and, yeah, please understand that I'm
not trying to diminish this man because
he is dealing with he dealt with a
stroke, which frankly shouldn't necessarily matter. It's not
like he is the if the point is
that this person is in a position of
power.
He's in a prison he's in a position
where he is supposed to be representing Americans
and the guy clearly can't even formulate proper
thoughts. Or rather just sound thoughts, not whether
I believe they're okay or not.
And then you can tell that he's being
influenced from an outside foreign entity.
And then weirdly he comes out, not even
this one necessarily, but he comes out with
these tweets that are like, okay, I we've
seen him tweet. We can look at his
past Twitter account. And suddenly you got this
differently articulated with very certain kinds of words
that seem to be right out of the
Israeli playbook. Gee, I wonder how that's working.
I wonder whether it's being sent text that's
being typed or someone's literally controlling it for
him, which very well could just be his
staff. My point is that this person is
such so another one of these like a
Brian Mast pretend
representative American who is out of his way
blindly supporting
one of the most obvious things we've ever
seen in our life, a genocide.
And one of the main things he stands
with is the idea of the pager attack,
which was a brazen
violation of international law. No matter whether you
support it or not,
by definition, everything about it, no matter how
you frame it, Israel's
exact narrative, which was not true, is a
war crime.
It's just amazing that we can't come to
terms with this, and he is standing by
it. Children are being killed. Children died. And
you realize the game they played, that it
was all Hezbollah. That was proven to be
false. There was a 5 month gap between
when they did this and when they ended
up in people's hands. Or rather, when they
exploded them. 5 months.
So you're gonna pretend we know those were
all Hezbollah people. On top of that, Hezbollah
is not a terrorist organization. On top of
that, it's not just military.
There's teachers, there's hospitals, there's medical workers. And
so even within that, those are considered crimes
by international law. So these people are either
that uninformed, which I don't believe in most
cases, or are truly,
truly aware of the monstrous, villainous things that
are happening and are willing to support them
for whatever reason you wanna think about.
That blows my mind that people can't see
this. And here's what John said.
And this is in regard
to Gallant.
Israel defense minister, Hamas Hezbollah, no longer effective
proxies for Iran.
I mean, this just made me laugh out
loud. First of all, the idea these are
proxies for Iran is a sad, flimsy, ongoing
lie just like Iran with nuclear weapons. Despite
always being possible,
the evidence does not back it up. And
even their own state department, the different direct
discussions, I've shown you this live on the
show many times over the years, state the
same.
Yes. They're allies. Yes. They were. Yes. There's
even weapons transfer just like the weapons to
pretty much the worst, most dangerous people in
the world. And I would I would I
would point that out as well, but it's
about being objective. So Iran has allies and
Iran has every right to do all the
same things that all the rest of these
people do. And in most cases, almost every
case you can prove that they have a
fraction of the track record that the US
and Israel do. Even if I've said this
so many times. Even if every single thing
you've ever heard from Israel and and the
United States are correct about Iran.
Every one of them. Even if every one
of them were the accurate,
they would still pale in comparison to the
verifiable
aspects of what the US and Israel have
done. Not even the full picture, but what
we can prove.
I really want you to think about that
for a second. Especially those that are trying
to tell me that this is more of
a concern than what your governments are doing
while being led by a giant genocide committing
Zionist main maniacal agenda.
So my point here is to come back
to the idea of this lie. So we
can prove that they are not proxies, but
they're interconnected, and all of them are fighting
for the liberation of these groups whether you
think they're terrorists terrorists or not.
And they and and they've been lying about
you like, about this forever to rationalize their
illegal actions. And, again, even if this was
the case, what they do is illegal almost
every time regardless. You know, bombing Syria, for
example, without any legal justification, without any declaration
of war,
just because Iran there
is not legal.
And we all know that, nobody cares.
But now they come out and say, no
longer. So all this is meant to be
is we defeated them with this feeble attack
that seemed to barely hurt. It really affect
their ongoing process. Some people were killed,
and that supposedly
suddenly stops how their pro they're no longer
effective proxies? I mean, that's a really, really
sad like, at the very least, you'd come
out and make the argument that some of
what we did affected them in some way,
and we feel it's a success.
I would also call that a lie. But
this is just
screaming desperation.
As and John says, Israel's exposed Iran's proxies
as weak and left them significantly degraded.
What? What are we talking about here? The
idea that, first of all, we're gonna get
to in a minute, that even by this
recent report, at least 74% of who have
been killed in Gaza, and they they themselves
say it's an underestimate,
are civilians, according to multiple different reports.
So, and on top of that, we can
clearly prove that Hamas is not degraded. I
mean, that's the most embarrassing, the obvious part
of all of this, with US support.
You're gonna pretend like somehow Hezbollah has been
degraded in what you've been doing in Lebanon?
I mean, just yes. They have had assassinations,
but you can clearly prove that's not true.
So this is just, I mean, my thought
on this was going, what are they trying
to accomplish here? They're gonna come out and
say,
we did it, they're they've defeated, and this
is supposed to make me go, oh, they
got them. And then then then that somehow
translates to Hezbollah no longer being powerful? I
mean, I don't get what they think that's
gonna be accomplished here. Maybe they think this
will garner them more support
from US and other elements because they then
think maybe it's more possible. I don't even
know. But it screams desperation. And they said,
I salute and congratulate Israel for destroying this
scourge and
proving wrong the critics and so called
experts.
Again,
proving them wrong how? I guess in the
sense that maybe they say they weren't able
to do that?
It's it's it's just a it's it's just
Israel good, everybody. Yay. It's just
John Fetterman for you, ladies and gentlemen. And
it's all wrong. It's all false.
Right? And he congratulates them for openly committing
genocide that the vast majority of the world
can acknowledge.
Do you think he can't see it? Do
you think he doesn't care?
I said, the Zionist depre
dang it. Dang it. I didn't even notice
that. Damn, I hate when that happens. I
have a sneaking suspicion that there's something, you
know, it's all a big conspiracy, Twitter changes
my words.
I'm half saying that. I mean, I genuinely
have thought about this before. I I post
things, and I read them over and over
because of this. And on a side note,
by the way, despite my blue check or
whatever, which I don't ever seem to be
charged for since the 1st couple of months,
by the way, and who knows why,
that I don't have an edit button. I'm
not able to edit these things. I, half
the time, don't even have the long form.
So I just get this special version of
TLav Twitter. It's like it's suppressed and shadow
banned and whatever else and half my things
don't even work. But if I was anyway,
the point though is that it says depression,
I meant desperation.
The Zionist
desperation is almost overwhelming. What else can they
do but lie?
Now, of course, you know, because he's all
about America. Right? Comes out and says Iran
is clear about its desire to assassinate president
Trump. What?
What what are you talking about? Is there
any indication other than US intelligence that that's
even remotely true? No.
Not one. He says, yet Joe Biden and
Kamala Harris have appointed an alleged Iranian influence
agent to senior no. See, you're an American
representative,
in quotes,
who is pointing at an American representative
and claiming that she is an Iran no.
Excuse me. An alleged what okay. So you
don't know then?
So what's the issue? You don't know can
you prove she's an Iranian agent? The point
is, this is coming from Israeli accusations because
she has that background.
So let's pretend like this is not just
blatantly racist or really about Iran bad no
matter what and let even if you're a
citizen. But wait a minute. I thought Brian
was fighting for the Iranian people.
You see, my point is this is just
clouded with con with
inconsistency.
But it's saying to a role overseeing the
training of American troops. This is an American.
Now look. Is it possible she's working for
a run? Of course it is. Of course
it is. I would never say otherwise. Is
there any evidence for that? Not a shred.
Now if I see it, I'll happily report
it to you. But you're again, let me
stress this. This is a person that is
supposed to be representing Americans who is going
after another American representative because Israel said so
with zero evidence.
This man is a monster.
Like, legitimately one of the worst people in
this conversation who is screaming at his own
constituents, who is laughing about dead children, who
is going around in his uniform for the
Israeli military while pretending he represents you. Now
again, tell me why it's unimportant that we
should be talking about Israel during this election.
This is terrifying to me.
And and again, bringing it back to assassinating
Trump, there's there's nothing that makes that there's
no allegations about that. The Iranian government's not
saying that. I don't even see Iranians saying
that. But Brian Maas wants you to think
so. I wonder where that's coming from.
It's just crazy to me why people can't
see through these monsters.
Now here's Mike Johnson, Republican, says congress stands
resolutely behind Israel as our ally strikes in
self defense. Like, you just what am I
supposed to say today, guys? Okay. Self defense?
Got it. Response? Got it. You're a bad
guy? Got
it. These are high level people in this
occupied government. And no, I don't mean Jewish
people, ladies and gentlemen. If you wanna assume
that, there's plenty of people out there doing
that. We're talking about Zionism. And the obvious,
without question, influence that even MSNBC covers about
APAC and Israeli lobbies and za and everything
about it provably
influencing the outcome of policy if not controlling
it.
I don't know why that's contentious with how
much evidence we have, but, actually, we know
why.
The very the point makes itself. That's exactly
the point. But Tony mon Montana says you're
all traitors.
And just simply highlights how they're all doing
the same thing. Like, just like last time
I showed you, I brought up, like I
think it was almost all of congress.
All of them. Left or right. Came out
like the with the last time and because
they were given directions, I support the current
thing. Israel. America stands with the greatest allies,
says David Gustave. Mike Pence, America stands with
Israel. Dan Crenshaw, America stands with Israel. Joe
Wilson, America stands with Israel. Almost like they
were given the exact stiping.
Almost unanimous.
I don't know why conservatives do not freak
out about that.
Now here, as Casey Wright shared,
is a, bit of coverage around the attacks
from Israel.
Now this take it for what you will,
but I think it's important to highlight
that this the points he makes, no matter
where it comes from, I think are very
valid. It doesn't necessarily prove what Excuse me.
Hiccups all of a sudden.
Doesn't necessarily prove what he's saying.
But he makes an excellent point that I'll
I'll let him make it for himself. Like,
the dynamic of where they are,
the argument that most Iranians, which I believe
is false, are supposedly anti their government and
that's why they're fighting for their freedom. Now,
there's definitely people that don't like the current
government just like half this country currently doesn't
like the US current government. Does that mean
we should deserve regime change? I mean, that's
like this is the lack of overlapping logic.
The point though, is I don't believe that's
the case in Iran like the way they're
framing it. But if it was, then they
would have video.
Right? Most likely. Not solid, absolute, but they
would have video of the different locations that
they claimed they bombed and so on. It
seems to appear that most of it was
stopped. That ultimately their their systems were able
to stop the vast majority of what they
were trying to get through.
Now I I'm I'm expecting almost that once
that comes out more and more that Israel
will bring it back around and say, well,
we tried to we just wanted to deescalate.
That's our last ditch effort when I don't
think that was the case. But you can
decide for yourself. I think the video does
a good job explaining this.
Most dramatic footage came from the outskirts of
the Nevatim airbase,
which houses Israel's prized f 35 warplanes.
Those videos showed in the range of 20
strikes on that airbase alone.
Israel later acknowledged, in fact, that Nevatim had
indeed been struck,
although it claimed that the damage to the
airbase was modest. Now, again, this he's go
the he's talking about the first attack from
Iran before he goes into Iran, Israel responding.
Now the the point is that we now
know for a fact that they got pretty
solid strikes on that base, if not more,
that they only hit military targets, and not
a single person was killed.
And and they warned them about that and
still got plenty through. I find that to
be fascinating.
No. And, again, the point is they warned
them because it was obviously about saying we're
gonna bomb, just like Trump says they did
last time, by the way, despite them lying
about that the very last time. All the
traumatic brain injuries when they said they're weak
and they couldn't even get through. Remember that
was what Trump said. Now today, he says,
well, they warned me and that's why they
didn't wanna attack us.
See? They lied to you every time. Whatever
works from the moment. Now Ron warned them
again. He called they called in. It was
a big public display and everyone talked about
it. They're gonna attack tonight. Because they wanted
them to ultimately be able to resist so
they could say, okay.
We responded, but we didn't do something crazy
to make you think you need to fight
more, and but Israel's gonna push back either
way because that's what weak people do. Let's
contrast that video evidence to what we have
seen thus far in the case of Israel's
strike on Iran.
So far,
no videos have emerged which show Israeli missiles
striking any land based targets in Iran.
In fact, the available video footage, which was
published by the BBC,
appears to show Iranian air defense missiles exploding
in the air over Tehran
as Israeli projectiles whittled toward
their intended targets, whatever those targets may have
been.
Now Iran's population
is almost 10 times larger than that of
Israel, about 91,800,000
versus
9,400,000
people
in Israel.
Moreover, we in the West
are repeatedly told that much of Iran's population
is hostile to the current Iranian government.
In such
circumstances, one would expect
that if Israel had achieved the level of
success it has claimed,
we would see at least a few videos
of land targets being struck in Iran,
but so far we've seen none.
Now before Iran and Israel exchanged missile attacks,
Iran was already no
So I I find that interesting, and I
think it's a the very valid points to
make. But it's for you to decide, because
I think right now it's pretty much up
in the air.
But, you know, on on ultimately how much
where it goes. But I stand by what
I said in the beginning. I genuinely think
that's where this is gonna go, at least
for the time being. But again, that can
shift rapidly depending on what Israel continues to
do in Lebanon, in Gaza.
Now Vanessa, as we I was trying to
highlight, we showed you that on the day
this was going on, 25th, she posted this
right away. Beware old photos circulating especially by
Zionist accounts. Which is just again, my point
is crazy that they did attack.
So and and yet they still have to
manufacture some some presentation for you.
This is not the current situation in Iran.
And all these pictures that were being papered
around, we and here here's actual they I
just quickly did it myself. It's from 2022.
And yet they're using it like crazy. It's
all over the Internet.
Now here, Brian Mast said Israel is showing
Iran and its proxies that they can't take
hostages without paying a price.
Again, playing into the idea of the Iran
proxies because that's what he was told to
do. And this is Israel showing that Iran
can't lob missiles and rockets at civilians without
paying a price. Oh, you mean the attack
that only hit military targets that everyone knows
didn't kill anybody even according to Israel? This
is my point. Brian Mast is lying for
them in a place where not even they
lied.
Isn't that ridiculous? Isn't that embarrassing for Brian
Mast? It should be. But I don't think
they're cur I don't think these people are
being guided about what's in their best interest
right now. I think they're being guided by
something completely outside of this. Obviously.
To their own detriment, understand, and yet it's
still happening. Like, genocide Joe and and, holocaust
Harris, as I guess they're calling them, or
Donald Trump openly saying he will continue the
same thing. But let's pretend like it's different.
He says killing Iranian terrorists
is the only appropriate response to Iranian terrorism.
Right? Assuming that we're talking about Iranian terrorism.
Or are we talking about Hamas that's funded
by Israel? Are we talking about Hezbollah? Are
we talking about the occupation of the Golan
Heights and the murdering people there? Or the
funding or the medical treatment for terrorists that
you guys did there? Oh, no. We're just
talking about Iranian,
but we're not talking about Iran, though. We're
talking about Palestine. We're talking about Lebanon.
So without any evidence, he wants you to
jump these dots all the way to the
idea that we're murdering Iranian terrorists even though
we're talking about people in the military, and
most cases in the past, civilians.
Or a leader
under the guise of a diplomatic dynamic or
any number of things we've seen over and
over, whether Soleimani and Anasrawa,
illegal actions across the board. But Brian wants
you to believe that they're okay because we
like it, though.
Yes. There are crimes, they won't say that,
but everyone in the world can easily prove
that based on the reading those laws that
are in place. But he goes, who cares
though? Because bad guys. Even though most of
them are being civilian they're probably civilians here.
Gen x girl says, dude, Israel has had
to use 2 year old footage of oil
refineries burning since they haven't hit anything worth
posting. So here we are again, where they
are in fact posting fake images even directly
from Israeli sources where they're showing you fake
information
and pretending
like that was an actual hit. My point
is that Brian and the rest of these
people are literally driving false narratives for a
foreign government.
I just can't get past how shockingly obvious
that is, and it really does show this
bigger picture that it's not some hypothetical
conversation. We have people in this government who
are
explably
acting in the interest of another government
and against American interests. Like, that doesn't have
to always be the same thing.
What they're doing is putting you at risk
for a foreign government that is laughing about
what you need
many, many, many, many times over, many, many
different examples from the Knesset, from Netanyahu's own
videos, where they tell you that they they
how easy it is to control the left
right paradigm. You know why? Because they fund
people like Brian Mast. Because the Brian Mast
of the world are the ones driving you
against yourselves.
It's wild.
Now don't forget this dynamic, which I still
think is pretty interesting to me. Because we
saw this live on the show
where this
no longer existed.
And it does appear to be this account.
And guess what? We've got on the way
back machine.
I found this just today. I'm okay. Well,
look at that. So it is an actual
account. Why did Daniel delete his account? No.
No. Forget for the podcast, we're talking about
the post about the the American pilot
who posted on Twitter. Here's Greg Stoker, US
pilot, real Daniel Alwan, breaks operational security by
bo boasting he's flying in Israeli airspace. This
is just before the Iranian attack,
hinting at an impending Iranian attack.
He quickly deleted it. Back in the day,
this would have gotten you fired. I am
I I immediately
asked,
is that on purpose?
Right? Was this meant to be sort of
the we're gonna attack without making sure that
we see that?
Again, this is my point. I think Israel
is in a very, very insecure position.
They need to project strength, especially to their
own people. But if they wanted this to
deescalate with Iran
now I don't mean in the long run,
but I mean at least right now while
it's strategically important for them, well, they would
want Iran to know that they were gonna
attack so that they could stop it, maybe
that's what happened. And this got floated, everyone
saw it. And they go, you didn't act
like you're fake news. It wasn't real. So
there's no indication on the normie side of
it that Israel was like, we're gonna do
this. Let you know, we want you to
know.
Just just my my thought.
And I I think there's something to that,
but that's my opinion. But so remember, this
guy posted, it says they will be they're
they will get the response shortly. I'm above
the holy land. Cap captain Daniel.
This one says, I'm I'm and I'm above
the holy land. Same thing.
Then it was deleted. In fact, before that
though, he was following up. Check this out.
I found this to be interesting. And by
the way his Instagram is still there, but
I don't know if they Why don't you
tell me in the chat guys if something
was deleted from this because somebody is telling
me about the Instagram in the last show.
But But check this
out. So, these people are posting this stuff.
Now, this was on the 25th. So this
is the day of the attack.
And so, he says And just look at
all these tweets down here, which again, these
are gone now, the other ones, but he's
posting this stuff. It won't be no picture
of a watch. Interesting.
And he's and then he put and then
he repost this,
and it says scroll down, you f morons,
and look at the post date. Now here's
what's fascinating to me, is that this is
not in line with any I mean, look.
We're we can literally see these these posts,
and it it's not the same thing. These
are brand new. I mean, look. And by
the way, someone like Greg, which I don't
know personally, but they've been consistent in being
accurate about what they're reporting. And this was
roundly shown. I mean, literally, as it was
caught in a lot of this and it
was live while this was being shown. That's
why I was frustrated when I turned out
this was gone for the show. The point
is it it was not some old post.
It was new. And yet for some reason,
I think because, like they're saying, this was
a big lapse or maybe it was on
purpose, then he goes, who's laughing now? And
then deletes his entire account. So it does
not bode well for somebody who's trying to
gaslight about an oopsie or maybe on purpose,
but then the account's gone.
I find that to be fascinating. So, again
and and there's Orwell in the chat, so
let us know if you saw anything on
the Instagram, by the way, that is now
gone. Because this is just the current Instagram.
Right? And so I think that I don't
see any indication of what we're talking about.
I don't know if you guys had said
that it was posted there. I don't know.
I'll include that for you guys to look
at either way. But to me, this is
interesting.
This either and look. And obviously, the point
that I'm not even getting at here, the
point I was first highlighting is that it's
just interesting to show that this might have
been deliberate, and it shows weakness. But more
than that,
that the United States is bombing a foreign
country for Israel.
But but shouldn't be shocking to this audience,
as we've been showing you from the very
beginning, that they've been on
the ground. Which now is being discussed, but
just as always demonstrating our value, we were
proving you that
weeks after October 7th because it was true.
And then even a month after that, Axios
revealed that there was a 3 star general
on the ground, and yet they still pretended
like it wasn't real. It's just painful how
obvious it is if you actually are objective
and nonpartisan.
But the US government is allowing their pilots
to be used. They're shit. So you are
fighting this. Again, if you need more reason
to understand why it matters for this election,
or selection, or in any dynamic that
Israel committing genocide.
You know, it matters. It is
it's the pinnacle of the conversation right now
for the world.
It's not it's just it's it should not
be insulting to hear that. It's obvious because
this is a earth shattering event. Maybe here's
the point, we're not gonna going forward,
you know, take an election of the past.
Going forward a 100 years, do you talk
about the random election in 2016? No. These
things because they are historically pretty irrelevant when
you understand, at least from my perspective, what's
going on. Even if you believe it's the
pinnacle of democracy,
it's still
less relevant, let's say, than the conversation of
many genocide that we've discussed.
Why? Because we're talking about the mass slaughter
on purpose, the genuine decision to murder and
ethnically cleanse an entire population. Yeah. That should
matter, guys. And I shouldn't even need to
stress that. I know you probably are all
on the same page.
But it's interesting to me that this gets
ignored in the conversation of the selection.
Now hot antiwar dot com, make sure you
check them out, says US was prepared
to rescue Israeli pilots attacking Iran if needed.
Now that becomes especially interesting with what we
just pointed to. Right? Maybe that's because they're
talking about US pilots that were actually flying
for Israel
or not. Either way, it's just showing you
how dedicated they are to maintaining the genocide
and literally helping them attack a foreign country
with no legal justification.
You realize how crazy that is? Like, it's
just in so many different ways. But, again,
everyone has their opinions about this when it
comes back to the support for Israel. Like,
am I
I'm not asking you to choose sides.
It's about, it's about being consistent with logic.
And if you're being consistent with logic, even
if you support Israel, you can recognize that
what they're doing is consistently
the violation in all of this. Even if
you also think Iran's actions are violating. The
point is that you can prove from square
1
what they're doing is illegal.
The assassination of of the scientist of before
this even started
was illegal. There's no way around it. So
if we're gonna go back before that, doesn't
that mean they can respond? You know, you
get the game. It's it's infuriating. And, again,
anybody honest
can see this.
Again, it doesn't mean you're choosing sides. It's
just being honest about the facts.
So in a larger sense because of all
this as we get to to, you know,
fin well, actually, before we get into the
Gaza specifically in Lebanon,
the US government for Israel, in my opinion,
is rolling out a massive effort of regime
change. Now I've been saying this before.
I've talked about the idea of the of
the, you know, we we touched on examples
of Honduras, which I think is underway right
now, and different more of the southern aspects,
but we've also talked about the Middle East
and different countries. My point is that right
now,
I think driven because of Israel, the US
government
is desperately
trying to move pieces around the board. Trying
to put remove
leaders that are suddenly not supporting Israel's genocide
and replace them with people that are amenable
to whatever they want, including genocide.
And it's everywhere.
I mean, it's crazy. And this is just
a couple of example or maybe, like, 5
or 6 examples that I've seen over the
last couple of days. But if you go
back and, you know, take this back post
October 7th, you can start to see
the the failure of the so called normalization
deals, which were nothing but coercing governments to
blindly go against the wishes of their people.
You know, democracy.
And then it has fallen into this position
of, like, even Saudi Arabia had kinda put
the halt on that. Israel was desperate. And
so you see them trying to move pieces
in a way to change the fact that
everybody,
everywhere, everyone, everywhere sees what this is.
So the US approves $2,000,000,000
in arms sales for Taiwan. Why not? Let's
kick this up. Let's throw dirt in the
like, my point is in the midst of
what's going on, you wanna create a dynamic
where China is gonna have a reason. I
mean, whatever your thoughts about Taiwan, think about
how ridiculous this is to do right now.
And I also recognize that, ultimately,
Taiwan
would, like any other location, I would argue,
has the right to say, well, we wanna
be our own location. But the question is,
is it any different than, say, you know,
when Texas or California said they wanna break
off in the United States? And they said,
no. That's not gonna happen. Or the fact
that the Donbas or Crimea, same thing. But,
of course, they only like it in one
certain way. And on top of that, I
have not heard any public declaration
from leadership of Taiwan saying, we are formally
declaring our separation of okay.
So if that were to happen, then I
could stand by something and say I'd support
that. My point is that that wouldn't be
the US' place to get involved.
Just like it wouldn't be anywhere else.
But the point is that the US government,
if you really understand the situation, is making
this the case. They are deriving this in
for obvious political reasons.
And funding that is just a blatant way
of poking the bear. They want this to
spin out, in my opinion. And it just
shows you this is about trying to create.
I mean, it very well could just be
chaos.
Create different things so we stop paying attention
to the genocide. I mean, at the end
of the day, though, this is something that
you have to recognize as the opposite of
everything they tell you they're doing. We don't
wanna be the policeman of the world. We
don't wanna well, obviously not. What you're doing
is the opposite of can you imagine
if China did this in any other dynamic?
Well, how about China comes over and goes,
you know what, Texas? We support your desire
to separate from the United States. Don't you
support freedom and liberty and democracy?
Well, clearly, they wouldn't go along with that.
They would say China was influencing their data.
They would say China is trying to well,
how is that any different?
Right? It's just it's embarrassing that we can't
see through that in some cases, but I
think most people are beginning to recognize that
the US government's track record is literally
overthrowing governments illegitimately all around the world as
far back as you can look
while projecting on everybody else. Now guess what?
Here's Syria again. Now realize that Syria is
a central part to the failure of what
Israel and the US have been trying to
do in the Middle East. And now the
Israeli minister, for whatever reason, stands up and
threatens Assad.
You are in danger.
And he very well is, I would argue,
because of the fact that they will they
are lashing out in sheer desperation.
And you have to realize that let's just
say, I mean, they have been trying to
go after Assad for a very long time.
That that's what all this is ultimately about.
That's why when you realize the entire Middle
East dynamic is the US government fighting wars
for Israel.
Not one side or the other, both
your government.
So is Syria a close alley of ally
ally of Hezbollah
and member of the resistance axis has been
under con constant Israeli attacks for several years.
And they do. They just routinely bomb Damascus,
kill civilians on a regular basis, and the
so called international community is deadly silent about
it. So my point is, for whatever reason,
since yesterday, they're just standing up and going,
you're next.
Again, it could be a hollow threat in
order to get you to look anywhere else,
but I actually think this is building. I
think the US and Israel are trying to
they I I'm willing to bet you they
sat down and planned out how to divert
attention, how to shift the direction of the
narrative, how to take some back some level
of control
through
just absolute
destruction
and violation of anything that anyone's ever hold
sacred held sacred.
Least of which is the rules based order
that they seem to pretend they still are.
Eramate.
That we're back to we're back to Russiagate,
guys. No joke. We're literally being told by
a one of the central swamp creatures of
the of the Washington dynamic, Nuland,
that Russia is gonna do it again, apparently.
You know, the thing that we have no
the the thing that's never happened before rather
look. To put it this way as always,
I have no doubt that Russia or any
other government is always doing what it can
to influence what they want from our country.
Just like the US does everywhere.
That's what they do. Not to say that
we should accept it. It's something that we
should drive me. My point is that it's
everywhere.
But that does not go in my opinion
to the f the extent that they overthrew
or controlled an election.
It's certainly possible. But again, if we wanna
talk about that, maybe we should rack our
wrap our minds around let me see if
that just The Guardian comes up.
Nope. I'll just bring up this one.
I cover Oops. That always happens. I I
covered this recently.
And this was an article written by The
Guardian and Mondo or rather,
Mondo. One one of the main a couple
of main mainstream article platforms.
But I I entitled the Israeli Election Interference
and Psychological Operation Induced Industrial Complex.
It's not a secret. This guy was literally
boasting about 19 of 22, I think, elections,
national presidential elections that they've influenced
on behalf of Israel. He is a Israeli
agent. Even The Guardian pull pointed this out.
He's got 30,000 bots that they use to
influence conversations. This guy is hired by governments
to influence the outcome of elections.
I it's just right on the surface. And
here we are, you know, Georgia, there's a
reason it was Russiagate because Russiagate distracted you
from Israelgate. Which is what was actually happening.
Or or the Ukraine dynamic. There's so many
different things that ended up pointing directly to
Israel and all of your
government tried to point in another direction. That's
what I think this is. Right at this
moment, you've never had more evidence that Israel
is
desperately trying to influence your perception around all
of this. Now you could argue that means
trying to put someone in position, and I
think that is part of what we're dealing
with. And I only say it like that
because I don't believe
our
voting is influencing the outcome. And I don't
think it's been that way for a very
long time. It should.
But my point is that I think right
now it's about convincing you to think a
certain way for the outcome that they're gonna
give you, and I think that's coming from
an outside influence.
And the only thing they can do is
get you to look anywhere else.
So Aaron says, for the 3rd consecutive presidential
election, Russiagate propagandists are accusing Russia of manipulating
Americans
into not voting for their preferred candidate.
Which is hilarious to me because the whole
thing they're doing right now is driving you
to do that.
Adults pick the lesser of evils. Oh, so
vote for someone you don't like because that's
the best. Well, wait a minute. Is that
exactly what you're talking about? No. No. We're
talking about Russia trying to do you know,
it's just a lazy overlap.
Their your own people are telling you to
do that right now. And if you can't
see the influence from Israel, which we'll get
to, then you're blinding yourself to all of
them.
But it says here, Victoria Nuland complains that
Twitter is no longer,
partnering with the US government to censor stories,
except they are though. No question.
It's weird that she would say that despite
in his own lawsuit. He claimed that 87%
of the requests from the government had been
app been app appeased.
And that they already met, if not exceeded,
the GARM requirements.
And yet we all bought the narrative that
we were sold around that because that makes
sense. Right? Even Mike Benz admitted that ultimately
the GARM thing didn't even go away. They
disbanded, but the actual influence that they had
set up was still present.
But we don't talk about these things because
we're all blinded by partisan politics. Right?
They are complying.
They're censoring for Israel. They're working with the
ADL. Why are we lying about these things?
Why why would Nulin pretend that's not the
case? Because Israel.
Now it says this is a oh, she
says, she what she calls content moderation that
we saw in 2020.
Well, that's interesting. Isn't that isn't that an
a a good time to to share this
one?
So we're talking
oh, wait. Oh, I didn't remove the video.
Sorry. One second. We're talking about content moderation.
Yeah?
And she's literally sitting there telling you that's
the difference. This is exactly the point they
made about Clinton.
Where they're telling you, we need content moderation,
and the right spins out of, oh my
god. They wanna take your free speech away.
Okay. So you know who else is talking
about content moderation
and are and are openly telling you that's
what we're doing? Yackarino and Elon Musk.
I was shocked by the evidence uncovered by
the house judiciary committee that a group of
companies organized a systematic illegal boycott against x.
Of an open feedback loop
for the advertising experts in this room
to help
develop Twitter into a place where they will
be excited
about investing more money. Product development,
ad safety,
content moderation.
Content
moderation.
That's what the influence is.
That puts your global town square, the one
place that you can express yourself freely and
openly.
We have built
content moderation tools
that have never existed before at this company.
If you are gonna post something
that is lawful
but it's awful,
you get labeled
at long term risk.
People are hurt when the marketplace of ideas
is constricted.
And we've introduced a new policy called
freedom of speech,
not reach.
No small group of people should be able
to monopolize
what gets monetized.
But more importantly,
if you are gonna post something
that is lawful
but it's awful,
you get labeled,
you get de amplified,
which means it cannot be shared,
and it is certainly
demonetized.
No small group of
Ain't that sad?
Right? I mean, come on.
What's the difference? The difference is one you
like, one you don't. Or rather, at the
very least, one you ignore and one you
don't like. Let's not pretend like you're all
in love with the World Economic Forum mass
supporting vaccine supporting,
what, Jaquirino.
I mean, she is exactly think about how
crazy it is that you're RFK and Elon
Musk and even Donald Trump and Jaquirino, these
are all the people on your side for
the right. Those are all Democrats, guys.
Again, from my perspective, it's all the government.
But it's amazing to me that that can
be overlooked. How embarrassing that oh, of course.
But it's the unity party when you don't
wanna acknowledge that it's weird. Right? Except a
huge part of that conversation is pointing out
why they're not actually Republicans. But who cares?
My point is, it's all the same point,
content moderation. And we freak out about how
that's what she's proposing, so is that's what
they're currently doing,
but for a topic that you're okay censoring.
That's called hypocrisy.
She's this is a reference to censoring journalism
on Hunter Biden's laptop on the CIA lie
that it was a Russian disinformation.
That's totally I mean, the idea that that
was suppressed, 100%.
Speaking of Russia and election interference, Nuland is
well versed in practicing it. As a senior
state department official, she was instrumental in funneling
the Clinton funded Steele dossier into the into
the FBI. She personally authorized the early July
2016 meeting where Steele gave an FBI agent
his dossier, which helped kick off the multi
year Russiagate scam, which has unquestionably
been shown to be a falsehood.
And yet, here she is.
Election in a row in which Russia has
tried to interfere to try to get Trump
into the White House.
How do you assess the magnitude and the
the type
of interference they're attempting,
this year compared to what they've done in
his previous two elections?
Well, as you said earlier, Rachel, he's he's
at it again. This time, he's not even
trying to hide his his hand and he
has far more sophisticated tools. You know, his
AI
is better so he can make these fake
videos.
He has done things like spend $10,000,000
trying to buy American influencers.
Oh, wow. So I guess we're talking about,
Putin. Right?
And and so now we're now we're conflating
what is that? The tenant media point you're
making right there or and which was, by
the way, never proven to be connected to
anything but RT? But let's pretend, like, it
all just means Putin. Putin's back there. This
is this is this Maxine Waters now?
Putin's the one. Putin, take it on the
chin. These people are children. But I think
it's I don't think that they're acting I
think they're doing this because that's how they
view you.
They think it's that easy to just go
Putin does bad things and Putin bad guy,
and we're supposed to freak out based on
no evidence, but a known career liar continue
to tell you what they want you to
think to drive in the point to ignore
how Israel is literally paying our politicians.
And get them parroting his his lines and
not even know it's happening but he's Ah,
okay. So see here's the problem. So now
I can come up with my thought that
just so happens to be the same thing
that this person over here might be saying
and now I'm a shill because I formulated
my opinion that happens to be the same
as theirs? No. That's not how that works.
But what the the way they're doing that,
it sets it up to be anyone who
says this thing
is that.
That's just straight up suppression. That is to
dismiss
anything. Facts aside, it doesn't matter. Because you
don't even know you're a Russian shill. It's
just it's it's become so abstract and lazy.
But that's my point. It's because the people
that are still invested in this, they don't
need anything. They my point is she can
come out and say, you're supposed to do
this. I'm on this side. They'll go, got
it.
Most of that crowd won't even need anything
more. Those are our marching orders. We're supposed
to say this and do it this way.
Got it. I'm genuinely I mean, we all
see it. I don't believe that's the majority,
but it's enough for them to lean into.
So she comes out and she gives the
marching orders. And now we're gonna have this
stupid conversation throughout the entire supposed election. You
also got a brand new very, very powerful
tool which is Elon Musk and x.
You can't you think about stupid this is.
We're gonna pretend that Elon Musk is being
influenced by Russia now?
Where's the evidence, Linda?
Or or, Linda,
Victoria?
Excuse me.
Come on. I mean, look. If there was
any evidence, well, I'd talk about it too
because it's interesting to show that if there
if there's any influence from an outside entity
to somebody who's literally a part of a
con a per a potential administration, that should
matter.
And, yes, see, that would apply both ways.
And so that's why she won't tell you
how he is, like, tied to the hip
of Netanyahu
and has openly admitted and how Yaccarino is
literally admitting they're working with the ADL to
censor things that they don't like about Israel.
How they're working with Israeli intelligence to take
your biometrics if you verify yourself on Twitter,
or how they're using CHEQ to pretend to
stop the bot that are flooding the platform
with Israeli bots, or how they are straight
up censoring for Israel to hide the open
genocide,
or, you know, influencing the outcome of trying
or trying to overthrow Venezuela or lie about
Haiti or lie about I mean, these people
are absolutely
being driven, and she wants you to pretend
it's for Russia?
I mean, it just doesn't even line up.
Look at some of the things he's pointed
out. You could argue he's, against that. I
mean, it's just sad. But it my point.
It does not need facts.
This is the marching order. You know, in
2020,
the social media companies worked hard with the
US government to try to do content moderation
to try to catch the And see that's
the point. They point that, oh my god.
See? They just told you they work with
the government essentially. Yeah. That's happening right now,
guys. That's happening right now. On Twitter, right
now. This stuff as it was happening,
but, this time, we have Elon Musk talking
directly to the Kremlin and ensuring
that every time the Russians put out something
like this, it gets 5,000,000 views on x.
I can't believe she would I mean, who
this is kind of the larger point as
well from the selection.
People are gonna hear this,
even democrats, and go, okay. Like, I may
want to lean into that because I don't
like Trump, but I'm talking about the ones,
let's say, the liberals that may not be
blinded by the teams who are politics that
kinda go, well, okay. Where's the evidence here?
And then when you come to realize that
it's actually very easy to see that it's
the opposite,
what does that do? They drive people to
go, well, this is the party that's lying
to me.
I can't stop seeing that. And I go,
I I'm the one pointing out that Trump
and the rest that are lying about a
1,000 things, but it's not like this. It's
not this in some of them are, honestly,
but most of it is about
floated promises with no background, things that contradict
what they've already done, you know, pretending we're
fighting for freedom of speech while you're literally
censoring spree. My point though is it's not
this coming out and saying something that right
at that moment you can prove it's not
true.
Almost as if it's designed to make you
realize they're liars.
I I just can't stop seeing that, that's
why I'm more concerned about the ones falling
for the the selection that is gonna be
the Trump administration. Before anybody can catch it.
So it's it's quite dangerous.
Although, I do think the American,
electorate has gotten more sophisticated and more savvy
about this stuff.
Right. But but we'll do it for you
though. You you you're getting better, but you're
still stupid, so listen to us.
These people have such a low opinion of
you, it's hilarious.
And they're wrong, by the way.
But including this, to make sure you check
out the the the real entity that's without
question influencing the outcome of these elections. Now
in in the point of a of of
foreign policy point about Russia, specifically, since she
mentions that, well, guess what? A US ranger
was attacked,
just a a greater group attacked in Russia.
Now and then look. You could argue this
has been manufactured, but it's kind of hard
to manufacture something like this.
Showing the tattoos
that they have coming from special forces.
Right? And there's there's a there's a couple
of these going around.
Che bows a in Russia,
Bronsk,
Russia special forces tracked, ambushed, and wiped out,
according to them, a team of western saboteurs
working under the Ukrainian flag who infiltrated the
border.
Apparently, US and Canadian.
Tattoos clearly show that they are current or
ex US forces. That's certainly possible they could
be ex. But just think about this.
This is my point about the larger discussion
of regime change and chaos. You literally sending
in,
whether Ukraine or the United States,
Canadian and US troops to try to sow
chaos inside of Russia.
What they're just like with the whole point
of Ukraine itself, I'm I think they're back
to square 1. I think they're desperately trying
to get Russia to react in a way
that can be used for a larger dynamic.
I mean, look look at it this way.
Do you know what the US government would
do if they caught Russian troops trying to
infiltrate Washington or whatever else?
You damn well know what they would do,
guys. They would create some physical
they would respond with action,
which I'm not supporting of. My point there
would be that there's no reason to bluster.
Weak people do that. You don't need to
bomb and murder people to act like you're
strong. Strong people don't need to do that.
Your strength
is shown by your
action
in the sense of, like, your deliberation, your
understanding, your you don't need to come out
and like, my point would be if you're
in the middle of something, to act with
violence before it's necessary shows that you're the
weak one. That's my opinion. In this case,
everything they do is stay is pounding their
chest and saying, we're gonna do this, or
Trump would say, we'll respond like you've never
seen before, even though that's just usually a
bluff. I believe this is about trying to
sow chaos.
Here is the DOD
reviewing
the weapons and funding going to Ukraine,
finding half of weapons that were sent to
Ukraine lacked documentation.
I mean, how do we not see what
this is? You realize that's Trump's administration to
everybody, guys. This has been going on a
long time.
During Trump's administration, during Biden's administration. I mean,
this goes back long before even the discussion
of the ongoing Ukrainian war. They have been
conducting
operations against these people.
And, again, we could talk about Donbas, specifically,
Crimea, or specifically Russia. Or the decades decades
of sowing the basically creating a Neo Nazi
front inside of Ukraine
pre predominantly post 2014 with the coup, but
for a lot longer than that. Going back
to 1948,
I'll include this since I haven't brought it
up in a while.
This is a show I did a while
back called not just the Azov Movement.
Documents and it's you can look at them
look at them yourself. They're CIA documents that
literally state that they were cultivating fascism to
be used against the Soviet Union at the
time.
So even if you wanna pretend like just
like with the mujahideen discussion,
right, where they literally used them and then
left and, you know, became something or they
coaxed them into something the entire time, either
way, they're responsible. So now we have them
using a group that they drove into power,
allowed to become predominant, and they lie about
it. Right before it was like, nazi, nazi,
nazi, then it became, no. You're wrong. You
misunderstand. And it was just they think you're
too stupid to see that.
They have been doing this a very long
time.
So the point is they're sending weapons to
this entity just like they did with the
moderate rebels, just like they do everywhere around
the world.
You can call that bad guy if you
want. That's a good way to describe it.
But I try to avoid the the the
moniker of good versus bad. The the anyone
doing this is in the wrong. K? The
US government doing this, these are the ones
they would call terrorists.
While pointing at other people, doing a fraction
of that and calling them being the focal
point of their
terrorism themselves.
All of these governments are capable of these
things in my mind. The reality is there's
only 1 or rather, I think a couple
of them at this point that are being
provably shown to
not just seed weapons in these dangerous locations,
but fund the people they claim they're fighting.
I should I don't know why we pretend
this isn't the case anymore.
Now here is doctor Strangelove pointing to what
Blinken said. Now, again, all this is in
the last couple of days. As he says,
US looking for the new Donbass.
Right? Georgia is about to hit the jackpot.
Georgia in in, not in the United States.
Here's the actual tweet. The Georgian people
embraced democracy yesterday.
Now, Georgia's political leaders must
respect the rule of law. Oh, okay. So
you drove a you drove something into your
action on the ground. Right? Some USAID, NED
driven, fake protest. And you go, we demand
that you respond to what they say. What
do you mean you demand?
That you or rather specifically that you must
respect what they sell. What the this is
embarrassing to show. These are people that are
literally supporting genocide,
acting like they support the rule of law.
And then Blinken, of all people, the one
who's been caught lying 14 times over around
starving children is gonna stand up and pretend
like he's some arbiter of the of what's
right and wrong. And he goes on to
say, the repeal by legislation that undermines the
fundamental freedoms, address deficiencies in the electoral process.
Really?
And move Georgia towards its Euro Atlantic future.
Okay. So, guys, wherever you think about the
location, whether no matter regardless of whether it's
one of the most despotic places on the
planet,
this is an entity that has driven that
into reality everywhere it's gone who is now
telling you we need you to do what
we tell you because we claim we're supporting
the people. Okay. What about the people of
Donbas?
People of Crimea?
What about the people of Sudan? What about
the people of Haiti? Oh, I guess we
don't care about their democracy because you get
what you want from them already.
You realize how easy it is to see
how flimsily dishonest these pea they lie about
everything
right on the surface. And if it wasn't
for the blind partisan support of the minority
of this country, that they wouldn't they wouldn't
get away with this.
You are literally trying to put people in
positions in all all these different countries. This
is close to Russia
for obvious reasons.
And pretending, like I'm listening to even say
that this is a the pea let's just
say this is completely organic and the people
want this change. They're still sticking their fingers
in and trying to get what they want
from it. That's how this works. The people
of Georgia will not get anything they want
if they allow
the insider manipulators to out to drive the
outcome. And I guarantee you, they're gonna be
doing things like they've done in every dynamic.
With Syria, any
situation. Ukraine's the same. You can see them
shoot their own protesters, blame it on the
other side, and then use that as the
catalyst to overthrow the government.
Over and over and over. And I play
this directly from the clip from the, Kathy
Ashton with the,
Estonia,
p, member of parliament.
Saying we know that we we've I mean,
I think I have that right in the
beginning. I just played it the other day.
I only played the first part of it,
actually.
And it's important to see that, ultimately,
they know and they admit
that it was the side they're supporting that
shot protesters.
And she and she, like, reluctantly goes, yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. I just wanna go. Ignore it.
On February 20, 2013, the world was shocked
by video footage of snipers firing on protesters
in Kyiv, Ukraine.
21 people were murdered, and it was widely
assumed that president Viktor Yanukovych and his supporters
were behind the attacks. However, a phone conversation
between EU foreign policy chief Kathy Ashton and
Estonia's foreign minister, Irma Piatt, which was leaked
to the public on March 5th, reveals the
snipers were from the new coalition government and
that western diplomats knew this and covered it
up.
Yeah. Yeah. So that he has some sort
of, what to say, trust among all these
Maidan people and and civil society. And second,
what was quite disturbing, the same Olga told
that, well, all David then shows,
the people who were killed by snipers from
both sides, among
policemen and then people from the streets,
that they were the same snipers
killing people from both sides. Well, that's yeah.
That's So that and then she also showed
me some photos. She said that has medical
doctor or she can, you know, say that
it is the same handwriting,
the same type of bullets. And it's really
disturbing that now the new,
new collision that they don't want to investigate
what exactly happened. So that there is now
stronger and stronger understanding
that behind snipers, they were it was not
Yanukovych,
but it was somebody from the new coalition.
I sure miss Storm Cloud's gathering, by the
way. He was the one that that video
comes from.
He he used to do such amazing work.
And I believe he just ultimately built a
homestead and just kinda got away from it
all, so good for him. But, point being,
from Kathy Ashin, there's plenty of other examples
by the way. That clip goes on to
show Victoria Nuland handpicking the new democracy,
which was all a bunch of Neo Nazis,
and they openly it's embarrassing how clear it
is.
Alright. The point is they clearly shot their
own people. And she seems like, yeah. Like,
the way she responds is as if it's
like, well, yeah. But we're not supposed to
say that. Like, it is so obvious.
The evidence is everywhere. And now this person
from,
the division of the Human Rights Watch group
simply responds by saying, in respect to Step
Blinken for the podcast talking about the Georgian
people embrace democracy. And she says, are you
encouraging the Saudi people to embrace democracy to
to and Saudi political leaders to respect the
rule of law? Just curious. Right? It's as
simple as that. It's how easy it is
to show these people are hypocrites. You know
how long they've supported one of the most
despot this is an authoritarian
monarchy.
And we're screaming about so you want people
to become like, let's realize that Iran, for
example, is a democracy.
I mean, if you wanna pretend this limited
democracy game, well, everything they would say there
applies to the US, by the way. Every
single metric. But look, they're democracy. I don't
care what your screaming, screeching, partisan, zeroes, Zionist
narrative is. The evidence is so obviously clear.
They have plenty of issues. I don't support
any government for that matter, but it's the
case.
But at least they're the at least they
look. And I'm not even saying I support
democracy. I'm saying that's what they claim they
want. Right?
Look at Saudi Arabia.
They're not even they're not even pretending to
be a democracy, and yet they don't even
talk about that. It's been they've been an
ally for them since the petrodollar. It is
it's so obvious. And that's the point she's
making very well right there. And with zero
engagement, it seems, because who cares about the
facts?
Now on top of that last point on
this, Saudi Arabia
summons leaders of mercenary factions from Yemen's western
coast. Because let's not pretend like Saudi Arabia's
on the other side at this point. They're
just playing you know, you could see that
they're playing their own hand in all of
this.
But Mohammed points out, what is the regime
serving an American and Israel matter mass serving
its American and Israeli masters
scheming against Yemen.
So this is all spinning out right now.
These are just a few of the examples
I can see just on the surface right
now. Imagine what else is going on. So
they're bringing in these factions from Yemen because
they I guess they're done with Haifa,
by this fake leader they've been having living
with Riyadh for a decade that nobody cares
about anymore. Like, that's the o that's the
Guaido of Yemen, by the way. Nobody cares
because he's not the leader. Nobody supports him.
But they've been really trying to jam him
back in using Al Qaeda on the ground.
And it's so easy to see.
So now because it's an
immediate outcome, they're pulling people from every location,
trying to overthrow certain places that seem strategically
important. And I think they're gonna you're gonna
see something spin out in Yemen.
Just recognize that none of this is legal.
But who cares about that, I guess?
Now talking about what's going on in Gossam.
Because it's unreal
how long this has continued. And and and
the evidence being
one of the most obvious things, if not
the most obvious thing I've ever seen in
my life.
I mean, we were saying that during the
COVID dynamic. I mean, this takes the cake,
guys. There's no way
you can look at all this as I
mean, it's right on the surface of the
conversation. Even what Israel puts out proves that
there could be a genocide.
They just say it different. They just call
it another thing.
What you're looking at here is a map
of Gaza that's only gotten worse. It's actually
mind blowing to me how how
how many bombs they've used, which again, out
that's they've out bombed
the largest locations bombed through World War 2,
the entirety of it. They've got more bombs
in this small location in just 1 year.
These are all provable in act the, facts.
The amount of children killed, the amount of
journalists killed, the amount of ambulances and medical
workers, and and UN work I mean, it's
unreal. They've broken records everywhere. They've killed more
UN workers in this one thing than apparently
ever in history.
Really think about how crazy that is. And
it's not UNRWA. It's some yes. UNRWA is
primary, but we're talking
about gen UN workers that aren't from Palestine
that just are also UN workers or aid
workers from Oxfam, UNICEF, World Central Kitchen, which
isn't necessarily part of it, but all these
different dynamics and or Doctors Without Borders. They
don't even pretend these are homages. Do it,
nobody says a word. Now we're gonna get
to Lebanon too. Apparently, a 164
medical workers in Lebanon.
Are we pretending they're Hamas? Or are we
going with Hezbollah now? Because either way, it's
all a war crime, no matter what.
And there's evidence on the ground in Lebanon
proving you that they are not what they
say they
are. But it's not because that's my point.
It's not Gaza, and it still continues.
You if you thought it was about awareness,
you're wrong because now it's just on the
surface.
Remember the whole thing about gold and that
place in Lebanon? Weird how that just dropped
off the map. You know why? Because they
immediately went and were like, yep. That's not
there. Oops.
So, I mean, they could've just decided to
bomb it anyway and just given you their
fake propaganda video they probably cobbled together, but
they prob they think they decided all otherwise.
Maybe it'll happen later when we've forgotten about
it. The point is, it's so transparent.
And everybody everywhere across the world sees it.
What you're looking at with this map is
all the locations they have bombed. I mean,
I don't know how to pluck out the
percentage from that, but you tell me. What
does it look like to you? 80%?
90%?
I mean, the the point is there is
no safe area. There is nothing on here
that's not bombed.
What you will see though is central bombing
locations that are, you know, again, which is
like 80% of the map. But if you
look if you zoom in, you'll notice there's
red dots everywhere.
There is no spot on here where they
have been safe. And they're bombing constantly. Bombing,
like we said, from day 1 as even
Egypt reported on the beginning on October 8th.
Or it might even been 7th, quite frankly,
but I think it was the 8th. They
they they reported. They're bombing the crossing. Their
their trucks are coming in with aid, and
they're bombing the crossing. They're bombing where they
were. They're bombing where people are going to.
They're bombing the safe zones. The very first
one they told them to go to.
All on the record.
So I simply said, now play this again.
Let's get the video. It's important.
What more do you need to see? If
this was literally the only thing you could
see, there would not be a question.
You could argue that that was all Hamas.
Sure. I'd need to prove that. But you
can't pretend it's some kind of precise pinpoint
targeting most moral, more than any army you've
ever done in history,
that's a that's an insult.
Literally, everyone knows exactly what this map shows
you. Genocide.
Which history will remember, no no matter what
they try to do. If you are around
those pretending this is not what it is,
remember them.
They are dangerously deranged, morally ambiguous people.
I will stand by that.
Anyone who can look at this,
not
talk about it with nothing in front of
them, look, engage with the body of evidence
that even Israel shows you, and pretend this
is not exactly that.
There's something wrong with that person.
I very rarely make statements like that. But
I'm telling you guys, there's just no way
around it.
This information
is everywhere.
And it's not like even the COVID thing
where that was the the science was there,
they were ignoring it. This stuff is being
posted by Israel.
There's no missing this right now. You could
stick your head in the sand and deny
it. Like, you could call that maybe a
point o 1%. But the bottom line because
I mean, even that would mean that you
know you're ignoring something. Right? That's the point
I'm getting at. Like, there's awareness here that
you can't deny.
Here is Avi Shalem, a Israeli,
prominent,
academic,
a Jewish person himself.
I'll get this goes back from he's I
think this is from bef,
2021 or something. He talk this is Human
Rights Watch he's speaking with. And they're discussing
the nation state law, where they they passed
a law that says this is the state
for the Jews alone. And Netanyahu even stood
up and defended that when
a person on TV said, no, no, no,
they have equal rights, and he said, no.
No. It's for the Jews alone.
Explicitly stated that. And that it's an apartheid
state. And this is a highly regarded Jewish
academic telling you that this is what they
are. And that Zionism
is
racism.
You need to understand how central this is
to the larger point.
Zionism
is racism.
Israel cannot be both. Israel is either
a racist Jewish state or it's a democratic
state for everybody, and that's what I would
like Israel to be. I'd like
a democratic solution, one state with equal rights
for,
all its inhabitants.
Your organization,
Human Rights Watch,
issued a report last year,
about
Israel Mhmm. And the conclusion was it is
an apartheid state.
And the 4 major
human rights groups in the last 2 years
who issued similar report, reached the same conclusion.
Israel
is an apartheid state. So
apartheid
is racism.
Apartheid
is discrimination.
But
Israel is the only member
of the United Nations that I know
which is officially racist,
and I say this because of the,
July
2018
nation state law, which says Mhmm. The Jews
have a unique
unique right to serve determination
in Israel.
Unique means exclusive. Yes. It means Arabs have
no right to serve determination.
Mhmm. It means even if Arabs became a
majority Mhmm. They would still have no right
to serve the termination.
So most certainly,
Zionism
is a,
is a racist ideology,
and it is largely responsible
for the Anakba
that has unfolded throughout the last century and
continues today.
Yep.
Pretty damn clear. And for those that want
need to see it,
this is the article from 2,019.
The title is Israel is the nation state
of the Jews alone, colon, Netanyahu Responds, the
TV star who said Arabs are equal citizens.
I mean, it's all one of the points
always people, like, are aware of this love
to make is just imagine if you were
seeing these headlines in western media.
Yet they'll come out and say you're racist
for suggesting such a crazy thing despite it
being public information in Israeli media.
How often I've made that point. It's incredible.
People just can't allow themselves to see it.
And then here are the
3 leading human rights groups, Human Rights Watch
2021,
that it is apartheid. No question.
Here is Amnesty International,
same point, from 2022,
Israel's apartheid against Palestinians.
Here is the important one which is an
Israeli Leading Israeli human rights group. 2021. A
regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan river
to the Mediterranean sea. This is apartheid.
No real you know, it it people just
will see what they want.
This is undeniable.
This is Zionism. Zionism is terrorism. It is
not Judaism.
Watsam al Dawul points out that from an
American report,
the Watson Institute For International Public Affairs, the
US government. So you, American watching, have paid
over 70% of the cost of Israel's genocide.
Make let's sure I mean, I I I
almost thought that should be the title today.
70% of this genocide has been funded by
American tax dollars.
As he writes, it's also an American genocide.
Now to be clear, I would say American
government genocide. Because look, this is not something
being voted for. Americans aren't will like, in
most cases, willingly
signing on to finance a genocide.
Nonetheless, your government's doing it in your name.
That's that's why it's so important to see
what the rest of the world thinks. Now
a lot of these places, I think I
are honestly argue because of the work like
ours, that most people in the world are
aware that it's not Americans, it's the government.
And the same point I make about the
Israeli government, even though I can point out
most Israelis seem to be in line with
the agenda, that there's still a good portion
of them that don't want this. That's important.
So it's the government that's the problem.
Right? As well as anybody that might carry
that on, but it's the government that's the
central part.
Same point here. That most people around the
world would see it and recognize it's the
government doing this to us. And that, yes,
there's plenty of Americans that probably support it
too. But there are still people out there
that would see that and then look at
you
as an American. Just like you might be
convinced by your politicians to look at people
over there and say, they're terrorists. It's the
same damn thing. How about we recognize that
our governments are playing us all and stop
being useful idiots?
Now here is, Abir points out, a Christian
family in Lebanon.
Israeli settlers
backed by army. Oh, I I thought it
I'm pretty sure
oh, I could maybe I'm wrong. Maybe it's
West Bank. I thought this was
well, I apologize for that. I mean, I
it's West Bank now that I'm reflecting on
the the information.
It's it it says imagine raiding someone's property,
holding a gun, and still considering yourself, quote,
the innocent who is threatened and endangered.
Israeli settlers backed by the army destroyed the
house of a Christian Palestinian family. So I
apologize about that. You know, there what it
is, there's another video we'll get to which
you'll see why those got mixed up, that
is for in Lebanon. Which is it's incredible
how much this is going. Now this this
goes back well before October 7th.
A Christian family.
Not that that should matter anymore, but the
point is that's supposed to hopefully reach some
of these Americans that might think otherwise. They
might think that should be any you know,
the bottom line is it's it's a human
being
who is being deprived of their rights.
You are forcing them to finance their own
house's destruction, and if they don't,
you hurt them for it.
Or or or force them to do it.
There's no legal justification here, guys. This is
ridiculous. This is a a a group that
has been displaced
from their own home. That's why UNRWA exists,
keeping track of the right of return.
And then when they've built a home in
a place where they were told to go,
they swing back around and go, guess what?
We wanna build a park. You gotta get
out because you're not Jewish. That's literally what
goes on. And then it turns out well,
the point being is they don't have a
permit.
You can prove these people have been fighting
for permits for decades
and getting denied.
And then they use that as the and
the the outside observer's gonna go, oh, well,
they don't have a permit, so they shouldn't
be there, if they really want to ignore
the facts.
Either way,
this is illegal in everyone's perspective, even the
United States.
But who cares. Right? Because election. Because
politics.
I just am appealing to the humanity out
there.
That people just have, you know, deep down,
you are a moral in person.
You you know what's right and wrong.
There's nothing right about this.
Now the point is about how this again,
this is the the West Bank.
We're talking about illegal settlers.
This guy being one of the most sinister.
A person that was killing in in people.
Raping, pillaging, murdering, burning things down. And this
guy is not my opinion. This is one
of the this is one of the most
obvious examples. This is the guy that recently
got killed. And then they eulogized him for
being a murderer. I'm not making that up.
As BM says, just so you get the
full picture, in October 2023, following a history
of taking part in anti Palestinian terrorism, this
guy that you just you saw, murders a
Palestinian harvesting oils or or olive. Excuse me.
Instead of being jailed, and this is a
public story, by the way, he's recruited to
the reserves.
His intention to take revenge on Palestinians, any
Palestinians, which is exactly what the most radical
parts of their government want.
He proceeds to serve in Gaza. Unauthorized
unauthorizedly
burning houses, which is what they praise him
for, by the way, in the clip I
just showed you the other day. They literally
say, in this eulogy, that you burn houses
down. We just oh, actually, I have it
now. Let me show you that first since
we're gonna go to another clip, which is
another one. Last show, I showed you a
clip of him saying that. Well, guess what?
Here's Times of Israel.
Quoting him.
Reservists eulogized for desire to take revenge against
Gazans, setting home on fire to boost morale.
That's the title from Times of Israel.
They they were moaning about how they took
him too early. All you wanted to do
was murder everyone in Gaza. They took you.
That's what they were literally doing.
Do you realize the deranged disconnect from humanity,
from reality that shows?
This is the hilltop youth. These are the
people that are supported by the Ben Gevirs
of the world who are, in some cases,
challenging even Netanyahu.
This is a very terrifying reality that your
government and all the partisan supporters are okay
with, at the very least willing to vote
for because they don't think they've got her
the choice. Well, tell you what. I'd rather
do nothing than vote for genocide.
But I'll tell you right now that these
people are
they believe they're on the right side of
history. Not every I believe a lot of
Israelis are and I'll show you even more
so why in a minute, are struggling with
this. But these people believe they have a
right to murder your children as long as
you believe the wrong thing.
Really let that sink in. And your governments
are fighting for them. Here's what it says.
Quote, you were the happiest and biggest goofball
in the platoon. This is from this guy
we're gonna show you right here. The the
one of the leaders of their of the
platoon, I guess.
He says, we realized this for the first
time. When you set a house on fire
without approval
in order to boost morale,
said one of his fellow soldiers in a
subsequent eulogy.
You realize we're talking about killing people.
Because that's happened in multiple examples when they
did this, or just simply burning down a
home with no legal justification.
But that he well, now now we're gonna
start acting like we care about that while
you're murdering children with no legal justification?
I mean, this should matter because it's all
against the law. But everyone in the US
side of this wants you to believe that
these people are not doing this. Even though
they floated a sanction and pulled it back
when smokes would yell at them.
Gee, I wonder who's actually calling the shots
here.
Here, the the so this is the what
this is the one we're showing you right
here.
Literally talking about how it was okay just
to lift the atmosphere. Different translation, same point.
Oh, and here's that clip if you wanna
see that. Where they're screaming about how you
just wanted revenge and we where the, you
know, and how dare they stop you.
It worries me how many Americans believe these
people are someone you should support.
And if you wanna make that about being
Jewish,
that's in your mind.
Whether these people were Jewish or Christian or
Muslim, I would think they were disgusting human
beings.
Now he says he proceeds to serve Gaza,
burning houses down, including women and children. Oh,
no. Why? That's why I wanna grab this
for you too.
Derek, Roberts recent article I'll point out. But
it says,
he is then transferred to Lebanon.
Why? Because this is they're using the worst
that they have to to torture
the people. If you don't think that's accurate,
listen to what they're actually saying. People in
the Knesset are wishing for this. We will
kill them all. We should destroy their families.
Like this, they're calling for this. So they
take the ones that are most the the
ones that aren't gonna have mental issues because
they're murdering children, which by the way is
what's happening.
300,000 apparently, mental care because of what they're
doing in Gaza.
Despite the fact that they're doing it, which
they should go to prison for, it still
shows you that they might have some level
of morality in there and are doing it
anyway. Still still accountable for it though. But
the point
is that they said go to Lebanon now
because we want your special kind of terrorism
to be applied to them because they're not
listening to what we want. That's my opinion,
but I mean, you can watch how this
plays out. It says to continue his killing
spree there. And the only thing that stops
him eventually are the local resistance fighters. Without
them, he would've probably just kept on killing
indiscriminately.
In his military funeral, his friends openly talk
about his war crimes. The ones he intended
to commit and the ones he committed. You
can listen for yourself. Again, it's even cooler
by times of Israel. After the funeral go
viral go video goes viral, a few Israelis
express outrage.
They did, some of them, which is my
point.
And are now being silenced by other Israelis
who claim it is disrespectful to talk that
way about a hero who died defending us,
which is the majority of the conversation. Both
of those points matter.
Meanwhile, while covering the funeral, Israeli mainstream media
intentionally omitted the controversial parts. You know why?
Because they know you don't want that.
They don't care. They'll pray they they were
defending people from getting raped in prisons. But
when it becomes something that they know Americans
are paying attention to, they know their mandate
is to convince you they're doing the right
thing. You need to realize why that is,
guys.
None of the guilty parties at rights, of
course, is gonna are gonna pay the price
for this.
And this is the people that these governments
are supporting. Now here this is the article
from June that Robert covered. Israeli settlers consistently
use arson attacks to burn Palestinians alive.
And it's not conjecture.
Read it. This is a very famous case,
at least the picture right here, of Ollie,
a child that was burned alive in a
house. And not only did they do that,
they then taunted the family.
Ollie's on the grill. They taunted them, pretending
that they burnt or pretending with a fake
effigy burning them in front of their parents,
laughing at them in their faces. Nothing happened
to them. In this, you can see Ben
Gavir dancing with them as they burn an
effigy of a child going, burr, he's on
the grill. They're laughing and dancing and cheering
about the fact that they burned a child
alive.
If you think that's a misrepresentation,
look for yourself.
It's not a question, guys. It's written even
by Times of Israel.
This is one of many examples. And by
the way, since October 7th, they've been burning
houses down just like they just showed you.
Just like they admitted to in this article,
some of which have been killing people.
I just don't know how anyone with with
any level of compassion or human empathy
can pretend like this makes sense.
And my point exactly is that there's plenty
of Israelis that do not think it's okay,
who do have empathy, human compassion. Yes. And
some of them that just want their families
back, who also would not care if they
continued after that to kill Palestinians. That's important
to note. But there is a good portion
of them. Not even close to a majority,
but a good portion of people that are
protesting
to fight for what's right. And here, this
guy,
this is the guy from 972 magazine.
What is it? Or or in Ziv, highlights
the important fact. Now in Tel Aviv, Israeli
left wing activists protest their war in Gaza
and Lebanon outside the Ministry of Defense. Now
he writes them as radical left wing, which
I find interesting.
Either way, the point is, there are people
there that are protesting against what's happening. Not
just for families, but ending the genocide.
So just recognize this, guys. This is not
as simple as people want you to think
it is. The Brian Mass morons of the
world would love for you to think that
everyone's on your side. You if you believe
this is okay, you are in the rapidly
diminishing minority.
Now, Mint Press News recently put this out,
but this has been something we've covered already
in the show. 300,000 Israelis need mental health
care following the genocide in a regional war.
This is according to the Israeli Ministry of
Health.
They've stated it expects to receive almost half
a 1000000 Israelis for mental health treatment.
Now I think they're pray putting this out
because they want it to to to kind
of garner sympathy.
But this is my point about how reactive
their propaganda is. Apparently, they're just too stupid
to think past the idea that this may
actually hurt them in the long run. Right?
The idea that you're exposing, that what you're
give putting them through
is something that causes any human soul without
psychopathic tendencies to go, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe
I shouldn't be committing to murdering children and
laughing about it on TikTok.
I anybody without that level of of psychopathy
is going to have a problem with this.
That's my opinion.
But I think they want you to take
it as, you know, they suffer because Hamas
and they're going to get I mean, it's
very I don't think they thought it through.
But you need to recognize how clearly this
shows you that most people know this is
wrong.
Now in Gaza,
as Brian points out, another horrific massacre in
Gaza, this was from today.
Now I've heard reports of over 80. He
writes over 77
killed.
Again, martyrs just simply mean they're killed. They
were not strapped up and ready. These were
kids that were sitting and that were killed
unexpectedly by an Israeli attack. Since, remember, when
they use the word martyr, all it means
is somebody that was killed. And it could
mean someone that got killed in the act
of something, but it largely means people that
were killed. So you could replace that with
killed or died. 77,
including 17 children.
Dozens injured lie under the rubble of the
bombed 5 story residential building
where they were sleeping.
It's sad. I mean, it just it never
stops. Day in, day out. Day in, day
out.
Doctor Mustafa points this out as well. A
whole extended family was wiped out in an
airstrike on their homes.
More than 80, he says. Human beings
massacred. Fathers, mothers, children, grandkids.
And this comes directly from a human rights
activist advocate on the ground,
saying he belongs there there in a horrific,
a massacre against his relatives. The
Abu Nasir family.
His wife's uncle, his wife, his children, more
than 80 family members were murdered
because of the stack.
Not even a conversation about some Hamas operative.
No. It doesn't even matter. I It does
obviously matter. In the minds of the US
and Israel, it doesn't matter. Because no one's
pushing. No one's asking anymore.
We should be.
Now here's an important report coming from action
on armed violence. Now Remember, this this lines
up with the Lancet report. This lines up
with pretty much every other report that's already
been done. And what they find in this,
to cut to the chase, and it's worth
there's a lot of good data here. You
should read it for yourself. Is the point
that their dam their analysis
finds that
40,00717
of the fatalities. Remember, that's just the number
that we can prove.
Conclude that 74%
are civilians.
74%.
And even they will stress, this has to
be an underestimate, but we're basing it on
what we have in front of us. And
don't forget that the numbers
from the Ministry of Health
have already been
admitted by Israeli intelligence
to be generally accurate.
Or by the army,
additionally, by the way,
to be reliable.
I love throwing this in the face of
these screamers online. Even our supposed American representatives
that love to go, oh yeah, the misery
of the of Gaza,
you're gonna take words from Hamas? Well guess
who is? Israel.
So you're stupid. I love that that that
clip from, grandma's voice. So you're dumb.
The army checked and found that Gaza Health
Ministry fatalities are reliable.
And this goes back long before October 7th,
as even the US media has reported. And
vice, again, this is different. Our army says
reliable.
The Israeli intelligence says generally accurate. But yet,
we're supposed to pretend like we blindly disregard
them whenever it doesn't work for Israel. But
then acknowledge them when they want it to.
Right? That's how they work. Can we throw
2 things at the wall at once and
just pick whichever one works? That's how they
operate.
Now war on Gaza, Middle East high.
Israeli strike kills nearly a 100 Palestinians sleeping
in homes. That's that's the 80 or more.
It's still being discussed because the people under
rubble.
People that got mixed, you know I mean,
think about what these bombs do. These 2,000
pound bombs just destroy everything.
There's another point I'm gonna get to, which
I think is uncomfortable. We'll talk about it
in a second about children, but plight of
Gaza civilians, unbearable.
This is on 27th.
It's a day this is before just everyday
is the point. Israel kills over 50 in
one day.
No one wants to talk about it.
Israeli forces on the 28th
kill 96 in 48 hours.
Day after day after day after day. Here's
Pelham pointing out. I'm not sure who needs
to know this, but the ones who are
bombing refugee camps,
bombing civilian homes,
targeting children,
targeting UN workers, starving citizens, bombing hospitals,
tar killing doctors and nurses, bombing schools, bombing
mosques, ethnic cleansing, stealing land
are not the good guys.
Shouldn't have to make that point.
This is what you're seeing in Northern Gaza.
Nothing but absolute destruction.
It's crazy. Absolutely crazy.
Doctor Azadeen
highlights that this and this is the point
to make. And there's, again, there's so many
videos that we could include in just this
one point. But what they've been doing in
the places they removed from northern Gaza.
Right? So the case is that they act
like we're getting rid of the bed there.
Getting rid of the mosque.
Then they and we'll we'll play we'll get
to a clip in a minute where they're
admitting it's now has been admitted. Even Matt
Miller, the fight 30 seconds ago denying the
plan, is now forced to admit that yes,
yes, Israel told us about the general's plan.
Yes, we
surrender or starve is the subtitle of that
plan. It's not mine. That's what Israel has
on. That's what they've stated.
And so word out is pretending like that's,
like, remember the beginning when the whole point
was, well, there's innocent people there.
And now they they tried to conflate it
with, well, human shields. We don't know for
sure. They're all being bound there by Hamas.
That was the only way they got out
of the fur out of the gate, average
people to accept the dynamic. Now we've gone
all the way to their side, and they're
going they're straight up going, get out of
the way or we're gonna kill you.
And we're supposed to go, yeah. That's what's
been we're we're not supposed to connect that
that's what's been going on the entire time?
That's what is the Palestinian people have been
telling you. That they've documented what we've proven.
It's not some new development. From day 1,
they were killing anyone that did not do
what they told them to do, regardless of
whether they were Hamas or anything else. It's
been one of the most easiest things to
prove I've ever seen.
So all I'm saying is now that they
come right out and say it, and even
Matt tried to deny it until later admits
it, it just shows you how far they've
lost control of this.
And how
they think they can get away with it.
So this video was leaked just and this
is from yesterday,
from a school, under siege in Northern Gaza.
A school where you have people that Like,
you have to realize, they blocked this off.
They have
Basically, are encroaching on this area that they
have locked down.
So you could argue that there may still
be some remnants of Hamas or maybe it's
all over. I don't know. But their narrative
is that that shouldn't be the case. And
you're talking about these people that you're telling
to get out of the way
in a school where many of them are
re taking refuge because they cannot go anywhere
else. So just make sure you understand the
dynamic. We're talking about children and elderly, people
with missing limbs,
babies possibly. We're both in the hospitals that
are moving as well as places like this.
Okay? More so the babies in the hospitals.
But the point is, people are ref taking
refuge in these locations.
Now it says he won't mention the school's
name to avoid endangering people there, who shared
the video. The Israeli army asked to displace
people sheltering in the school to surrender.
Right? Or die.
Clear what they have to choose, because they're
gonna kill them if they don't get out
of the way. So they so they go,
okay. Fine. We'll surrender.
And then they did this. So understand, even
when they go along, this is what happens
to them. Then they took them to an
unknown location, which they probably will never be
seen again. That's where we are right now.
They have them handcuffed
or bound on the ground.
Look
at that. Do we not have any humanity?
Right? Any compassion? I mean, you can tell
you can clearly hear this woman is terrified.
So the point is that
whether or not you go along, whether or
not you surrender, whether or not you get
out of the way, whether or not you're
Hamas or Palestinian,
they will take you down.
I don't even know why I have to
make that point, seeing as how every point
of this from day 1 has proven that.
And by the way, also, 47 different statements
from members of the Knesset or Israeli soldiers
or on and on and on. Openly saying
kill them all. But, you know, I'm the
crazy one. Right?
Here's
antiwar.com,
Israel kills 5 journalists
in Sunday Gaza attacks. Oh, there's 27th, by
the way. In case you missed it, 5
more journals were just killed. But no one's
talking about that. Right? Nobody.
I mean, I'm obviously, my point is about
mainstream, about the people that claim to care
about these things. That shouldn't be hyperball. It's
obviously plenty Andy Warrick's talking about it. My
point is to make it clear that the
ones pretending they care about these things
aren't mentioning
it. Now this is the one that really
kinda gets it. We've talked about this during
Syria.
Remember that conversation that got dropped as well?
I forget how many it was. Something like
this, 20, 30, 50,000 just children.
Somebody wrote an entire article about this, so
I think it was one of these,
just like say the children, one of these
groups that basically said, look, there's a whole
there's tens of thousands of children from Syria
that have gone missing.
Now, as she points out in this video,
they could be killed, they could be under
rubble.
But after the I mean, even still to
this point, there's still you know, there's just
like we're gonna see in Gaza, it will
take a
it'll take
longer than you might think to
remove just the
rubble. But there is examples where there's children
that just vanished.
You know my thoughts on this, guys. Like
any war zone, and especially when we're talking
about a group like the Israeli government that's
been caught for doing all these things, what's
where are they what's happening?
We're talking about trafficking. We're talking about organ
harvesting. I mean, these are not things we
should shy away from. My point is there
was a hell of a lot of children
that went missing.
We're in the midst of this right now.
And according to Save Our Children, there's 20,000
missing children.
Now, yes, you could argue most of them
are probably killed and buried under rubble. But
I'm telling you, we can prove to you
how many have been taken by Israel on
the record
that have never been seen again.
Think about that for a second. Here is
one of the doctors you heard from a
lot trying to get your attention. Oh,
Sam, there are over 20,000
children
in Gaza who are missing.
These are reports by Save the Children and
other other,
very credible organizations.
And do you know what what I mean
by missing?
Can you imagine where they might be?
I can't.
Under the rubble,
in mass graves,
means beyond recognition so that nobody can identify
them and know, you know, who the what
the child's identity is.
Some of them have been detained, children under
the age of 18, under the age of
16, who've been detained by Israeli forces who
have disappeared.
In places where it's been proven that they
get raped. And I'm talking about before October
7th. I'll show you next.
But especially since then, where you can prove,
even on a video captured,
that they're raping. And then they had an
entire debate about why they should be allowed
to do that.
That's what you're talking about.
These are all
I mean, can can you imagine?
Now I was gonna grab that real quick,
but I ran out of time. Let's see
this,
I don't know what the title was on
that.
Oh well. Well, the the point the point
is we've gone over this extensively about the
the let's just do this.
Well, in general, here's just this goes along
with the conversation. This is from Haratz 20
24. By legitimizing rape, Israeli society takes one
step closer to total total moral decay. My
point is even horets and even human rights
groups have highlighted that they have done the
children, specifically children,
which just I mean, all this turns my
stomach.
The reality being that this has been on
the record for for decades.
And your governments just don't care. So who
will And as Francesca Albanese points out, 20,000
missing children in Gaza.
We call it genocide because it is genocide.
But here, I mean, I'll play this again
too since this goes along with that point
for those that might not have seen it.
It. Like, this is not a secret, guys.
This is what happened when the state department
tried to call this very thing out. We
have to condemn the atrocities that happen every
day to Palestinians in the West Bank. You
mentioned sexual violence.
I was part of the human rights vetting
process for arms going to Israel,
and a charity called Defense of Children International
Palestine,
drew our attention at the state department to
the sexual assault, actually the rape of a
13 year old boy that occurred in an
Israeli prison in the Muscabia in Jerusalem.
We examined these allegations.
We believe they were credible. We put them
to Israel to, the government of Israel.
And you know what happened the next day?
The IDF went into the DCIP offices and
removed all their computers and declared them a
terrorist entity.
I think it is vital that atrocities not
happen to anyone, not sexual atrocities, not sexual
violations, not any kind of gross violation of
human rights. We are looking at a situation
where there is so much dehumidification,
where people are not seen.
So think about that. Think about how obvious
that is. And think about the idea of
Matt Miller and the rest of them acting
like we're gonna wait for their investigation. We're
gonna let them tell us how this all
went down.
Well, there you go.
So talking about the healthcare side of this
as well,
Daniel Modos points this out. And by the
way, she she has something else we're gonna
reference down the show about Lebanon that's important.
Umazain Center For Human Rights latest report reveals
the destruction of Gaza's health sector due to
the relentless Israeli attacks since the beginning of
the ongoing Israeli genocide in Gaza. 162
health care facilities.
And realize this is Gaza,
just alone. A 132 ambulances. Now, by the
way, I just saw a fire the very
last fire truck was just bombed in Gaza
because that's how that goes. 34 hospitals shut
down, 80 health care centers,
a 147
medical person a 100 and 1,047
medical personnel killed.
Over a 1000 medical personnel.
Eighty civil defense staff.
That includes UN. That means it's unreal.
There is no war like this in history.
Or I should say rather a living memory.
Detained, 310 medical staff. Many of which have
never been seen again. According to these doctors
that are still saying this.
Now this is what really kinda blows my
mind. It really shouldn't blow your mind, my
mind, because again, it's the UN body,
not necessarily the the dynamic and the individual
states acting through it to try to stop
Israel but the body itself. I don't know
why anybody would trust. They've demonstrated themselves to
be feckless and toothless tiger around us especially,
but a lot more. But this guy, who
by the way was not long ago caught
for trying to pretend like there were no
troops on the ground and what was it?
Where he just got caught, it was embarrassing.
They're liars, guys. They're just deceiving you for
clear the interest of the power structures of
Israel, the United States predominantly right now.
But this guy straight up asked him at
a day when a an a UN member
was killed,
which by the way is sadly not shocking
at this point, seeing as how we're talking
about a 1,000 plus,
his response will blow your mind.
And this is even the corporate media, mind
you, that is stepping up and going, what
about that? Which I've never in my life
seen before.
Or did you mention an UNRWA,
staff member that was killed yesterday?
I I can confirm. Yes.
I can confirm that a member of the
UN Relief and Works Agency, one of the
drivers,
was killed when his vehicle had been shot
at, by the IDF. Yes. And the vehicle
was a UN marked vehicle? Yeah. Yeah. So
they killed them though. Love how you frame
that. After he was shot at oh, so
the bullet killed him or was it just
random?
So they murdered him is what you're trying
to say? Thanks, guy.
But was killed when his vehicle had been
shot at, by the IDF.
Yes. And the vehicle was a UN marked
vehicle? Yes or no? This was a UN
marked vehicle. Yes. Hold on. Why don't we
mention this anymore? Have we become so numb
to the fact that Israel is killing UN
personnel and there are now 233
that are dead that we don't even mention
anymore?
Unfortunately, I I did neglect to to add
this amid amid Coward.
The other,
For your own institution.
You absolute coward. That that we've had, but
the the the sad truth is that there's
so much devastation to report that that as
as you see, I've just gone over
about 20 minutes worth of stuff without even
getting to that part.
Or you mean not including it unless you
were asked about it. And the reality being
that if you're gonna be reporting from a
UN perspective, you'd think that a UN member
being killed
would would be on the top of the
list. At least make the list, but I
guess not. Like, it looks pretty clear that
he responded to the question and probably would.
The idea is that something's influencing that. It
very well could be the United States.
But think about how wild that is and
what that truly shows you.
So here
is Matt Miller
now admitting
that they have the star surrender or starve
plan.
Gaza, Matt, I know last week it was
said the Israeli government told you guys they
aren't instituting the so called generals plan, but
what is the US assessment of whether Israel
is intentionally carrying out a policy of starvation
and displacement in northern Gaza? So I'll just
say what the secretary said. He raised this
directly with the prime minister and and,
other members of the Israeli government. They said
to us that they are not carrying out
the so called general's plan. I will just
say that,
they should speak to what they're carrying out.
We would clearly reject,
any effort to create a siege, to starve
civilians,
to wall northern Gaza off from the rest
of Gaza.
We would fundamentally reject that in in every
way, and we've made clear to the to
them that we want to see
humanitarians,
humanitarian assistance make it to civilians. We wanna
see civilians protected.
And, as you know, the secretary sent a
letter to the government of Israel several weeks
ago laying out a number of specific steps
that we want to see them take to
get humanitarian assistance to the hands of people
that need it. But the US does not
assess that this policy is being carried out
in the north right now? So You do
not have your own assessment here? I do.
I'm I'm not gonna make an assessment one
way or the other. I'm gonna tell you
that the government of Israel can speak for
itself about what they're trying to do. We
are watching very closely,
and we are making clear to them
that they need to let human they need
to let civilians get access to humanitarian assistance.
How do you not I mean, this is
what this might as well be the same
video last time I showed.
And this is a different one. You're literally
admitting that they're not
getting it's so it's infuriating that we even
have to play this stupid game. And even
at least they're asking semi good questions, but
right there, you have such an opportunity for
a follow-up.
I mean and and nobody says anything.
So you just said that they need to
let aid through, so how were they not
restricting aid? It's a basic now even if
you tap dances around it, it's an important
clip.
But they let it go.
So the point is, as we said before,
Israel has admitted this plan. Their own IDF
members have publicly spoken to Horetz about this
plan. They're praising this plan. And this absolute
coward can't admit that because he's bought off
or he's influenced or he's ordered not to.
Either way, they're all complicit in genocide.
They're knowingly letting them starve children,
and, by the way,
also starve their own people.
Whether we're talking about Americans, American Palestinians, or
Israeli Americans, or Israelis who are all there
because of either being in Gaza at the
time or being taken by Hamas.
Most of all all of which were actual
military targets, some which were not, which are
crimes and should be held accountable for. The
bottom line is they're starving those people when
they do this. They're bombing those people when
they do this. That's why their whole population
is screaming about that.
But here we are. This guy just keeps
doubling down.
It should make you sick. These are people
that are not acting in your interest, America.
They're not. They're acting to defend a genocidal
maniac that's acting
because of your support.
Through them.
Money,
everything. Now here's Robert's article from October 16th.
Israel's surrender of a star of generals plan
for northern Gaza is nothing new. So regardless
of whether they wanna pretend that they said
it out loud, which they did, and it's
been admitted to,
it's not new. It's been going on long
before October 7th.
But, obviously,
in undeniable reality since then,
Now antiwar.com
is rarely Knesset passes bill to ban UN
Palestinian relief agencies. So we're totally not doing
all that, but we're gonna go ahead and
stop the group that's primarily responsible for doing
that.
It's again, this is past the point of
pretending like it makes sense. It is embarrassing,
it's insulting,
it's just literally I mean, it might as
well be Matt saying, that's not true, but
let me show you how they're starving people.
But then when you show people being, like,
Netanyahu
pulling food out of a child's mouth and
then going on to say, but that's not
starvation, though. Well, Israel claims what they're doing
is actually giving them exercise. You know, whatever
the stupid thing, and they will just pretend.
And the journalist in there will kinda maybe
ask questions but not follow through. And the
people that want to pretend will continue to
pretend.
This shows you more than anything the power
structure.
Who doesn't care what you think?
Do not let that drift away.
Go based off that, we're gonna go select
one of them to keep doing it?
Keep these things in your mind.
As Casey Wright points out, they've just passed
the law banning UNRA from operating in Palestine,
which we all saw coming. They've been trying
to get rid of UNRA. They they've wrote
about this before October 7th because it's a
central reality to exposing what Israel is, Denying
them the right of return, which they've already
agreed to, by the way, so they're violating
yet another UN resolution, but it doesn't matter
because they're illegitimate in every possible way.
But I still argue for the 2 state
solution and the right for them to have
a country because of the reality of where
we are.
But if you wanna be honest about the
reality of the law, it's an illegal int
entity, but it shouldn't exist.
But because of where we are, and as
even most Palestinian supporters will point out or
Palestinians themselves, the best way to resolve it
is to actually agree to what Israel has
always pretended they want, but has always made
sure they stopped a 2 state solution.
But they have 99 doctors that recently signed
a letter saying that 68,000 Palestinians had already
starved to death.
68,000.
On top of everything else. But this will
undoubtedly increase that number exponentially.
They know that. That's why they're doing it.
And your government supports it. Max Blumenthal points
out that Israel launched its propaganda assault on
UNRWA last January when it laundered a smear
in the Wall Street Journal falsely linking the
agency to October 7th. The co author of
that smear piece, by the way, turned out
to be an ex Israeli army spokesman.
Of course.
That's everywhere.
As Alan McLeod will show another point you'll
get to in a minute, you know, we're
talking about MSNBC
or someone like,
what is it? Ravie, Revet, I forget his
name now. The the there's it's amazing how
many examples you have of these people being,
almost, in some cases, current Israeli assets.
Or active or, you know, in in acting
in the interest with everything they do for
the this is the same unit 8200 overlap.
Now as always, to try to deny and
hide that fact, people love to make it
out to be that I'm talking about Jews.
I'm not. I don't care whether you're Christian
or Muslim. If you're doing that for Israel,
you're a problem. Or any government for that
matter, but it's about a government that's trying
to manipulate the outcome of our policy against
our interests.
What a crazy thing. Right? I'm such a
racist. Hey, guys. This is why this is
falling apart. Because I will stay in my
ground like a lot of people have been
doing.
You can keep making up lies about me.
I'm gonna keep showing the facts.
Eventually, people will I mean, right now, it's
already happening. People will see it.
But here's UNRWA saying, as of yesterday, the
vote by the Israeli parliament against
UNRA is unprecedented. It opposes the UN charter,
which it does, by the way. So it
gets so the same point as always. Elon
Levy screaming about 1701 even though they've never
held their part of it, which is to
remove from the occupation of Lebanon. But the
idea being
that they don't just get to go, we
don't like this group, so therefore, we're not
gonna acknowledge that part of the charter. They're
the ones pretending any other Lebanon won't abide
by the charter. Well, they actively don't abide
by the charter. That's called hypocrisy. Even if
you agree with their statements of Lebanon.
But it says failing to push back against
these bills will weaken will weaken our common
multilateral mechanism. Now, whether you support that or
not, point is what they're doing is in
the interest of hurting
Palestinian people.
Now, the joke about how they would care
about this without us being exposed that they've
never cared. Oh my god. We're shocked. Right?
The Department of Defense
audit on military aid for Israel.
Well, guess what? Not investigate for human rights
violations. You know, the one thing that the
the whole reason it matters. Right? So we're
auditing it to make sure we're not losing
money, but who cares about children being killed
with our weapons?
The only thing that matters for the audit
because if they were to prove that, they
wouldn't be allowed to sell them. I wonder
what's driving that mechanism. Merchants of death maybe?
The influence? The stock options? Or maybe just
the fact that they don't care because they're
fighting for Israel? Either way, it's a slap
in the face
to pretend like they ever cared, like they
were deciding whether they were or not, like
blinking and the whole conversation and exposed for
in fact telling them that they could order
it. But no, doesn't matter, we're not even
gonna look into it. You know why? Because
that very investigation, if it was done right,
would show you would lead you right back
to the US government and right to the
feet of blinking.
Which by the way, pro publica, which I'll
bring up since I kind of mentioned that
point.
Israel deliberately blocked humanitarian aid to Gaza. 2
government bodies concluded. Anthony Blinken rejected them and
even authorized them to bomb aid locations if
it was gonna help Hamas. This was all
very public. Even corporate media covered
it. But weirdly enough, it just dropped. Even
for corporate media, it's never discussed again.
Has to show you something.
Now antiwar.com,
again, make sure you check them out. Gaza
ceasefire talks resume in Qatar.
But no progress expected. Yeah. Like it ever
was in any contact. They've is Netanyahu has
been shown over and over by his own
people to never have cared about this,
which I'll bring up again.
And I could show you about 9 of
these in a row, all from Heretz, or
actually times of Israel too,
saying the same thing. This one goes back
to the, the this was the anniversary that
I think oh, no. Maybe that's I forget
if it's backwards.
Anyway, it's not super recent, but it's not
too it's not old either. There's post October
7th, about halfway through. It says how Netanyahu
has systematically
foiled talks to release hostages.
Despite claiming that's what they wanted. I mean,
it's just blatant.
So now that they pretend to go back
to the table, even though it's been proven
that they have been undermining the process from
day 1, it's because they're failing. That's what
I was saying before.
They after the pretend we're gonna go after
Lebanon, they got they failed repeatedly.
Well, they have to pretend the only win
would to make it look like they're the
ones seeking peace and everyone else is attacking
them. That's the last saving effort. So go
back to the fake table. Pretend like we're
the one fighting it, and Hamas and Hezbollah
won't let us. That's what they're doing.
But they are gonna continue to undermine the
talks.
Alan McLeod points this out about the,
I guess, the
solution. Like, so remember how far this has
gone? From the pretending 2 state solution, which
now we can prove as a matter of
fact, they've never wanted.
And, again, I can these are so easy
to bring up for people that haven't seen
these things.
This is from Haratz directly. Anyone who wants
to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state,
otherwise, the 2 state solution, has to support
bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas.
Harass posted that on October 9th. That's a
statement from in 2019.
And we played the clip a 1000 times
over. I'm not gonna play it again of
them telling you, yes. We sent 1,000,000,000 of
dollars in cash in an area where the
only thing they can use that for is
weapons. Can't buy a because it has to
be trucked in, so the lie was obvious.
And it's clear. We want to stop them
from having a state. Outwardly, the whole time,
they were pretending that's all they wanted, and
it was Hamas that was stopping them.
At some point, again, more than anything ever
seen, something needs to be written about how
wild this all has been. How
I mean, the psychosis around it. The provable
evidence that just gets blind I mean, either
that they're ignoring it or that they somehow
aren't able or even allowed to see it
because of some kind of technocratic al algorithmic
control. Who knows?
But it's always been there. It's always right
in your face. It's never easy or hard
to prove.
So the point
is that
as they fight to maintain that, or rather
coming from the beginning of faking for the
2 state solution, then it goes to sort
of like the the island. Remember the island?
The fake first of all, it was a
plan for, like, shipping them off the island.
Then it became, oh, here's your new location
for safety. And I'm just
just cycling through the same old things. Then
the pier, all these lies. The pier that
was used to kill more Gazans and it
never even gave them more food. I mean,
all of this was coming from American tax
dollars. My point is after all of that,
it's literally come back around to concentration camps.
As Alan McLeod says, that's what they're talking
about. He's not wrong.
The Telegraph. Former British Special Forces poised to
deliver aid to new Gaza
gated communities.
Israel set to engage private military contractors to
create safe bubbles
for Palestinians.
Right. So the ones that have been bombing
the safe locations are gonna create a gated
community that you can welcome yourself into because
it'll be safe.
I mean, really?
I it's just I don't get what they
think people are this is going to fall
down. But they're gonna do it anyway is
the point. But it's amazing that people in
positions of power who, in some cases, at
least need you to think your vote matters,
don't care.
Even whether it's the platforms or the actual
politicians,
pretending like jamming them in their own territory
into a gated area is somehow the positive
outcome for you.
You know, and an aid coming from the
very people that have been depriving you of
aid the entire time.
Unreal.
And here's a clip.
This is from Dan Cohen.
Now this is actually unbelievable. So this is
a guy who is I guess he's,
ex CIA director, David Petraeus. Oh, that's right.
We remember we've talked about it in the
past. He looks different. Is he? That's weird.
He look is he am I crazy or
he looks very different than he used to?
Like, gotten older? I don't know. That's weird.
Anyway, the point is, he's openly discussing the
idea
of putting Iraqi, he says he jokes about
putting Iraqis in a concentration camps and proposes
doing the same to Palestinians in the Gaza
Strip. But the point that stands out to
me is pretending like this was something I
mean, we can all see how Iraq ended
up.
From the claims of, you know, treating us
like savior what is it? What did McCain
say? Or was it McCain? Or forget? They'll
treat us like no. It was,
no. I think it was McCain. Saying that
we're we're treating us like heroes. Right? They'll
welcome us like hue like saving heroes or
whatever the term used. Yeah. Hardly.
Everyone's aware of what actually happened. The point
is that they use that now as an
example of, like, look. We can do this
for Palestinians.
I mean, talk about being tone deaf.
Believe there should be a vision for the
future of the Palestinian people that is similar
to the vision that we presented to the,
people of Iraq before we conducted the major
operations that we did there during the surge.
And we would go to the people of
Fallujah
and we would tell them in advance of
our operation,
we are going to make your lives better.
We're going to do it by getting Al
Qaeda out of your neighborhoods.
And then we're going to stay in those
neighborhoods. We're gonna create gated communities, essentially.
Oh, good. So occupation
in a new smaller location.
Sounds good. Right?
This is an accurate description, but with much
more effective walls.
So even bigger walls then. So even less
freedom. Like, the point being that you're actually
describing
a smaller controlled location within occupied territory that's
already occupied according to literally everybody in the
conversation other than Israel and the United States,
and saying,
you should be happy about this. Almost so
this is my point from day 1 of
all this.
Proposing something that should be horrifying and asking
for praise.
He want you wanna be seen as the
saving hero, bringing aid for people in a
location that you jam them into that is
literally a concentration camp within an occupied territory.
Right? It it it's just incredible that people
can't see through this, and I know. Most
people can. I'm speaking to the ones that
still act like this is, like, the outcome.
Like, the idea that we can't have we
can see that they've never wanted a solution.
And that we're then gonna look to those
same people
for the solution, which is give them less
and call that a solution. In fact, we
would tell them. I said, look, you know,
it costs a lot of money to be
in a gated community in Florida, and we're
gonna give it to you for free Wow.
Fallujah. Wow.
I mean, you you wonder why people look
at these people like they're, you know
I mean, you could argue that he just
knows and doesn't care. But you're so out
of touch that you think, yeah, look, like
our gated community in Florida. Right? You would
just, we'll just give, we'll give it to
you for free.
It just, it's sad. It's very sad. And
that's the point about Al MacLeod. These are
concentration camps. That's what they're discussing.
Now, Lebanon, to finish up the point, and
we'll have one last point with West Bank.
On top of everything in Gaza, Israeli strikes
have killed a 164
healthcare workers in Lebanon.
Just since their recent engagement. A
164.
You re I mean, you realize in the
beginning of that in Gaza, they were at
least pretending to go at each one like
they were Hamas or Human Shield or so?
They tried.
And then obviously they got exposed. Right? They
don't do it now, but just because the
enforcement arm
rules based order is doing it with them,
so they don't care.
But there's what's the narrative here? Are they
all Hezbollah?
It's just it's astounding that people are pretending,
like, in anyone out there. The ones that
know it's genocide, pretending that they were gonna
go, oh, okay.
164 bad guys because Israel said, despite lying
about everything all the time in every conversation.
Let me let me preface these remarks with
I never never ever believe
Israeli figures.
I've been in the government too long to
know that the Israelis are patent liars.
As we're seeing right now, 164
killed. We don't even get a justification.
Herets,
October 27th. Israel's most beloved TV journalist
blows up a building in Lebanon.
You realize how brazen this is? How far
above and beyond they've gone from even pretending
this? This is just open like, I mean,
look. We see the IDF praising, doing terrible
things on Twitter and Instagram and TikTok
all over the place.
This too. But now we're going to the
level of having a TV presenter come there
as a publicity stunt to blow up a
building, which proves that it's a war crime.
Right? The whole point that Ritter made that
you can't if you're blowing it up from
a distance, that means you had to go
in. You knew that there was not a
threat and blew it up anyway. That is
ethnic cleansing. That's that is,
displacement ethnic cleansing. You are cleansing the area
of any of their infrastructure to do something
for yourself. Not for Hamas, but because you
what? You covet what is theirs.
Just like all of this was Palestinian Palestine.
That's the point. But it says Israel's most
beloved TV journalist
blew up building Lebanon. Israelis didn't blink.
This is for anti war. Israeli a air
strikes kill 9 civilians,
including a child in southern Lebanon town. This
is the 27th October.
Here's the 28th. Israel kills at least 67
in flurry of attacks across Eastern Lebanon. You
guys, we're talking predominantly,
in many cases, entirely civilians.
Your government doesn't care.
And you can objectively prove this. This is
not Gaza.
Here's Yuna Sarawi showing you why that's happening.
Look at this video.
You see that bomb that that huge
high elevation explode
that's why the massive
you're you're not pinpoint
targeting anything.
He says, I'm not an expert international law,
but this doesn't seem like self defense. It
looks like pure terrorism.
He found that on a soldier's account because
everything he does, he's proving this. That's why
the ICJ and IC, they're using his information.
Because he's documenting from their own TikTok accounts
that they're admitting to genocide, admitting to war
crimes.
Here's Sarah Abdul Abdulah pointing out the same
point in a different context. It's a different
example.
Look at this entire town. So just look
at this town.
The the whole
side of the mountain.
Israel's wiping out entire century old towns and
villages in southern Lebanon, some of which are
Christian communities.
This is more than mere destruction. It is
a ratio of history and heritage,
a crime against humanity.
Look at that.
Pinpoint targeting. Right?
All Hezbollah tunnels and human shields?
Does anybody believe that?
Norman Finkelstein doesn't.
As he says, Hezbollah fighters are Israel he
says Hezbollah are fighters. Israel is good at
playing video games.
Hezbollah will fire the rockets back because
Israel wins in the air war, a no
brainer,
but Israel loses in the ground war. The
Israelis
do not want to fight
hand to hand combat
with the party of God.
As you know, yesterday,
1st day of the ground invasion,
8 Israeli soldiers were killed. If it goes
on like this,
it will be a total catastrophe
for Israel because they are fighters.
Israel is very good
at playing
video games,
sitting behind a computer and killing people for
real, not just virtually.
They're very good at that. They're the best
mass murderers out there, for sure. But actual
combat,
that's not their game.
Here is the Klompas
desperately trying to deflect. Now, this is all
you're gonna get,
which, just so you know, if there's any
justice in this world,
will not. I hope I mean, I should
say should not, but real I will say
will not so the point is confused.
Will not stand up in court.
The idea that all they need to do
is say, here's a video of a tunnel
somewhere. Well, a tunnel existing does not prove
anything.
Let alone that this is some kind of
a has like, the the
dupe the, like,
recreation of your Gaza narrative, which by the
way, even then was not legally sound. Regardless
of everything you ever said about Gaza is
true, you are still breaking the law according
to every international
expert. Every one of them.
IDF discovered a massive underground Hezbollah terror base
in southern Lebanon. That's what they say. It's
enormous. It would have taken heavy machinery and
a lot of people okay. So what you're
admitting is that a organization
who is legal is is not a terrorist
organization, that is popular supported by the people
of Lebanon, that has all that is and
that has a military wing, has a base
that they happen to have underground. So does
Israel, by the way. Israel's got all sorts
of underground locations.
So just to be clear about that, what's
the example? The only reason that that becomes
an example to justify murdering all these people
is because they're bad guy. Therefore, normal things
they do become terrorism.
Right? You could I mean, everything you're claiming
around well, you do these things every single
day, but you just don't call it terrorism.
On top of that, here's the interesting part.
You can't even prove this is even what
we're talking about. We caught them 14 I
mean,
legitimately, on the top of my head, I
know of at least 5 or 6 obvious
videos where they were caught even by corporate
media
lying,
moving things around, changing scenes, having cuts in
the video that took them to a second
location. And there have been, like, people like
forensic architecture proven to you that they did
this. Or they they spliced videos together, and
they just keep going. Because what else are
they gonna do? But if you look at
this video,
all you're seeing is some room somewhere with
things on the table. Sure.
But how do we even know? And all
they do is talking.
And on top of that, let's just even
say it is exactly what it looks like.
What is that a crime?
Okay. Is the whole point is supposed to
imply that they're using this for terrorism. Realize,
this is not Gaza. There's not hostages here.
There's not some overlapping narrative that makes that
suddenly an issue
other than you saying they do things here
that they're not supposed to. You realize it's
not against the law for Hezbollah or their
military, which there's an overlap obviously, to have
weapons.
Especially since you've been waging war against them
for a really long time. Are they gonna
fight back with flowers?
I mean, it's just it's incredible that people
can't see through that.
Now, here's another one. Same point. IDF.
Says look at what our troops found and
dismantled that. So everything from there. Even the
fact that we whether they even found these
there, obviously should be questioned. Then whether they
actually found them in this village is a
huge question mark.
But the point is simply and then whether
that is a Hezbollah stronghold. We should be
expli doubting all of this.
But again, same points apply. Okay. So scopes
for a gun.
Weapons, okay, and then the vast majority is
a bunch of bags and camo spread across
the room. It's not even that much when
you really break it down. So what you
have here is a goop like, look. Okay.
Total,
A couple of launchers,
7 or 8 guns, and a bunch of
clips, and then a bunch of ammo. Or
rather, I mean, bags and camo.
So it's very small, quite frankly, in the
in the big scheme of things. On top
of that,
I don't understand. Are are these being used
for terror?
That's what they would want you to think.
Or are they just simply entities that are
engaged in a war? I mean, do does
not all sides use mil milimmunitions
to fight a war?
I'm not defending Hezbollah or any side. I'm
just applying logic to the idea that simply
showing you weapons, when they're in the midst
of a war, is not an indication of
nothing other than they're fighting you.
Now let's even say take it a step
further that it's in this location.
The idea is that you have been waging
a war on southern Lebanon. You've been trying
you've been coveting that land, which is a
very public conversation. Right now, they're even having
Hebrew names put over the areas in southern
Lebanon. They have an entire movement that's saying,
we're gonna settle there next.
On top of that, they've been doing that
for decades.
And they're currently illegally occupying parts of southern
Lebanon. So the idea that they wouldn't try
to fight back, what do you think the
US would do? If Mexico started taking parts
of Texas, well, they sure as hell would
start bringing munitions up to the border. Right?
Are they terrorists? Well, yeah. Probably in other
cases, but that would not make them terrorists
in that case.
This is the best they can do. Understand.
I sure would love to see actual videos
of terrorism or human shields in any context,
including Gaza. But guess what? That's not the
kind of evidence you get from the IDF.
You get clumsily cobbled together fake videos that
they get exposed for and just keep going.
As BM points out, Israel's changing the border
area inside of Lebanon. So on top of
everything else, as they scream about everybody else
filing the rules, the law, and the UN
resolutions,
they just disregard everything. There's supposed to be
a buffer zone, which is, by the way,
part of this the resolution they point to.
They're currently occupying parts of it in Southern
Lebanon. So the the primary reason this doesn't
take place is because Israel's never abided by
what it's supposed, just like every other dynamic.
That's not really some kind of anti point.
That's just the facts. But the bottom line
is that this is supposed to be something
that, like, you know, that's like a demilitarized
kind of zone. Right? Well, Israel's changing the
border area inside of Lebanon, completely raising everything
in that buffer zone with no intention of
allowing displaced Lebanese residents of the border villages
to go back to their homes, also known
as ethnic cleansing. And if you think this
is some kind of a byproduct or because
of a Lebanon dinner, because Hezbollah is fighting,
you're blind to the fact that they've been
wanting to do this, they've been praising this,
and they have settled a movement. They've been
asking for this for a long time. So
you could argue it's planned. You could argue
they used that as justification. In any sense,
what they're doing is illegal.
And here's the archive of an article in
Hebrew that you can read for yourself.
As always, as he points out often, if
you read the Israeli media, they'll tell you
all this stuff.
Or you can keep your head in the
sand and only listen to your politicians. But
Daniel Daniel Lamotis also points out, and that
this comes from the cradle reporting this on
their Telegram just to know where the source
comes from. And I think the cradle's been
doing an excellent job. There's a track record
there, but question everything as always. She points
out a high ranking Lebanese security source
to Al Akbar and Cradle reporting this.
It says US ambassador
excuse me. US ambassador to Lebanon, Lisa Johnson,
right here. So she's filling sort of the
Newland role in all this. Is continuing her
agenda to prepare Lebanon for a quote post
Hezbollah era. Because Lebanese want that? No. Because
the US wants that. Because Israel wants that.
By mobilizing
sovereignists.
You gotta love that.
They just can't get past their own hypocrisy.
Right? Two reasons I think they use the
word sovereignist, and what we're talking about is
another,
you know, internal revolution
planned by the US government are the guys
of fighting for democracy.
Like, they do literally everywhere. And you if
you don't know that by now, you're ignoring
simple facts that are published everywhere in the
world. But they're using the term sovereign sovereignists
because they don't they they want to create
the like, things like militia. They've obviously tried
to make a dirty word despite it being
represented as enshrined or being enshrined in our
constitution as something that we have inherent rights
to.
But today, you say militia, and people go,
that's domestic terrorism.
That's what they do. Sovereign is something that
is important. Sovereignty.
Something that they don't respect anywhere. Like in
Iraq or Syria or Afghanistan or Libya or
or Bolivia or anywhere else. They've completely disregarded
the sovereignty of those countries.
So they call the people that they're using
to overthrow a sovereign government sovereignists.
You gotta love that stupidity. Or really, it's
it's I don't think I shouldn't say stupidity.
It is stupid, but it you gotta it's
it's a plan. I think they do this
to taint the word, but also to create
the illusion like the Syrian's,
what is it? The
it's been so minute. It's been a minute
now.
What's the term? For the Syrian the supposed
forces that are the Syrian Democratic Forces. That's
what it was. You are these are straight
up those are the moderate rebels, guy. They're
the people that are being funded by outside
forces to commit terrorism against Assad to blame
it on. That's what they're doing.
Same point here. So it goes on to
say, in discussions with Lebanese politicians, she reported
reportedly said, again, according to reports to the
cradle,
Israel cannot achieve everything through war. It's time
for you to do your part and launch
an internal uprising against the banner of enough.
So let's watch as it plays out. Now
here's my point as before, because this got
exposed, they very well may scrap it and
do another go in another direction. Which doesn't
have to mean it never was gonna happen.
Could. We'll never know if it doesn't happen.
My point is that always recognize they'll shift.
The reality is this is what they do.
They undermine. They infiltrate. They overthrow.
Using the idea of some kind of internal
force fighting for their own freedom because they
know we have a soft spot for that.
That's my point about them always pretending to
be the good guy because they know we
want that. So don't let their evil reflect
on who we are as Americans, or the
world for that matter.
And yeah. But just like Israel, plenty of
Americans are falling for it. Plenty of Americans
are on board with it. I don't believe
it's the majority just yet.
Johnson encouraged her allies to hold meetings in
Lebanon to advocate
for the election of a Lebanese Armed Forces
commander. So we're talking about a coup d'etat,
ladies and gentlemen, as president of Lebanon.
So they wanna say election, obviously, but we're
not, you know, this is about trying to
overthrow from outside forces.
And and don't forget, the election complex, you
you know, industrial complex we just showed you,
there is a literal
mechanism through which Israel completes these things with
US support.
Now it says she reportedly said, quote, we
will appoint a strong commander for the Lebanese
army, and we will support the army in
restraining all Hezbollah supporters, meaning the vast majority
of Lebanon. Just like with the over the
operation regime, Ajax with the regime change of
Iran.
The vast majority of Iranians did not want
that and never supported it. That's why the
vast majority of Iranians lived in extreme poverty
while a very select oligarchy was living in
ver in
in abundance
during the Shah's ruling. And that's what they
love to point back to. Look at how
amazing it was while he was ruling. No.
The Iranian people suffered.
Now they there's plenty of ways they still
are. Because I don't think government's ever truly
acting for the people. But they want what
they they fought for what they wanted.
Not what some foreign government said they should
want, and shoved it down your throat. But
they're doing it again.
It says you will have backing from Arab
states and the west. That's obviously not true.
The Arab governments maybe, and even then, they're
being driven by their own people to push
back and it's gonna be a very difficult
sell. Overall,
you're losing support. This is desperation. Now this
very well could've been along with the opening
part about regime changes, but I thought it
was important to see along Lebanon.
We recognize guys, they are desperate. They are
pulling these rugs out everywhere and in many
cases, it's making, you know, what the analogy
like, they're all they're ultimately pulling their own
rug out. Like, that's how this seems to
be working. Like, they don't realize what they're
doing,
but that's my opinion.
We'll have to see how it plays out.
Now the cradle highlighting this is western diplomatic
offensive on Lebanon fails. This is as of
today. To control Lebanon's sovereignty from within, the
US and Israel seek a a pliant new
wartime
president.
Styled after the sycophantic figure of the Palestinian
authority,
Abbas, who Robert's written about many times on
the on TLAB is just it's not they're
not on the side of Palestinians. It's a
it's a useful tool for Israel.
So they're trying to create the same dynamic
to make it look like their own people
are enforcing. So that's what Lebanon people want.
It's not true.
And they says but as Western diplomats are
pitching this idea, they have learned Lebanon has
many cards left to play.
So we'll follow-up with this, obviously. Now here's
the one about Alan the Cloud was pointing
out. He says, if you're not sure why
the media is so biased when it comes
to Israel and Palestine,
remember, at least in this one case, and
it's the same pretty much everywhere you look,
that MSNBC's
executive producer was literally an Israeli military intelligence
commander.
Look at that.
Talking how are you gonna pretend that's gonna
be an unbiased source?
Now to be clear again,
this is the point, the conflation. They'd say
you're talking about Jews running the media. That's
maybe that maybe that's what he thinks. I
don't know what Alan thinks. But that's not
what he's pointing out right here. He's pointing
out this it it'd be like having a
the Chinese correspondent or the Chinese,
what is it?
The the executive producer
of CNN
while covering a Chinese genocide
being a Chinese
Israel military,
former commander.
The point is that the the only reason
they try to make it about a the
group is because Zionism has used that tool
to hide things like this.
It should matter to you that a foreign
asset or rather, just list some somebody that
was working for the military is the one
leading the coverage about that military's genocide. Whatever
military, whatever religion.
Now see, this is why it's hard for
them to try to do it's a racist.
Well, good luck trying to sell that. New
investigation on this is coming soon from Alan.
Check it out.
Now on a similar note, just showing you
the bias,
Hussam Nasir points this out. He goes, so
I guess the cat's out of the back.
He says he was fired.
So he's speaking about the reports, but it's
about him from CL Times. He was fired
from Microsoft on Thursday, and this this posted
on 27th.
Hours after a vigil
that they organized
to honor and remember the lives of Palestinians.
Simple as that. Killed and erodes by American
funded and Microsoft empowered Israeli genocide.
Now whether you agree with genocide or not,
that's the reality. America's funding it, Microsoft's empowering
it, a lot of these groupings are. So
get he he he organizes a vigil
for Palestinians. He realized many of them are
American Palestinians, and these people
fire him
for doing that. And this is the conflation
we'll get to in a second about the
idea of I think it's actually coming up
next. Yeah. This clip of Mehdi Hasan, who
I I'll make my points about. I don't
I do not trust.
The idea that the con the desperate conflation
of Palestine with Hamas, or Hezbollah for that
matter.
Even people within their own media circles, which
I don't trust, who I'm convinced are simply
opportunists, or at least believe they're good, but
don't know how easily they're being played, which
I get the sense of some of these
women here.
The point the bottom line
is that the the, I just almost lost
it. So the fire from Microsoft,
You know, the all the the conflation. I
thought there was a secondary point, but I
guess that was it. The idea that ultimately,
they're just conflating Hamas with
Palestinians. And it that's so transparently false,
obviously,
that even their own parts of these media
are going, come on. That's that's over the
top. The point in this clip you're gonna
see next is that they the guy jumps
over the top of this because he knows
he's protected in most cases. But right now,
because things are shifting, he's not. And it's
an interesting spin or shift
in the way this has been going down
for a very long
time. That doesn't mean in any way that
Israel I mean, Israel, I can prove to
you, is still influencing most of these people
and most of the conversation. Israel. Not Jewish
people at large, but the Israeli government, Zionism,
and the rest of the people supporting that.
So he gets fired for simply going, Palestinians
are being killed, and we should care about
that.
Do we not realize how shocking that is?
It's only because they wanna conflate that with
Hamas.
So let me show you how this is
failing. So we'll go back to what the
idiot Brian Massa has to say here. Let's
listen to the clip first.
Wanna be called Nazis? Stop doing You're calling
the same no. No. No. No. And see,
right out of the gate, you get the
point. Oh, I realize that. Mehdi Hasan, I
I feel personally
quite strong,
is playing a role.
Now that doesn't mean he's he's covered Palestinian
issues for a long time. So it it
very well could be that he has a
certain he has is sided with Palestinians. But
I just don't believe in the long run,
this guy is genuinely trying to fight the
larger, the problems of Zionism or in or
authority or, you know, imperialism, whatever we're talking
about. But just to be clear on that,
it's not about him or his, you know,
his starting point about the Nazi element, which
I was just it's lazy.
It's lazy.
They're not Nazis, guys. There's obviously, there are
plenty of overlaps, just like there would be
in Israel right now that you can clearly
show that a lot of people would scow
away from. But the lazy game of trying
to pretend that Trump's followers or that rally
was Nazism, it is a distraction.
Yes. There is an undeniable problem within that.
Just like I had pointed out the similar
things from different sides in all the democrat
stuff, many of which are supporting genocide with
Israel.
The reality though, whether the racist elements that
are there, they're not screaming we're gonna create
nazi. Yeah. You could argue fascism is it
would be there, but I would make the
same point for Kamala Harris.
It's all about these narratives that people get
latched onto.
So just make that clear. That's the silly
point that you're acting like nazis.
The people acting like Nazis are the ones
acting out genocide, or the ones supporting genocide,
or the ones supporting actual Nazis in Ukraine,
which apply to both left and right. So
just make sure that's clear. Now the point
is about what this guy says to him
about
all out of speak for himself. Don't call
an anti Semite more than anyone else's table.
Yeah. And people By the No. By me.
I never called you an anti Semite. I
mean, I'm not saying or saying I don't
I'm I'm a supporter of the Palestinians. I'm
used to it. Yeah. Right? Well, I hope
your beeper doesn't go off. So before they
freak out,
think about that statement.
I support the Palestinians,
so I hope your beeper doesn't go off.
So what's what's incredible to me, which you
could almost argue that he would that the
rest of the team was sort of ordered
to go at him
because he took this because he's he's the
his stance is exposing the point.
Well, so are you suggesting that they were
bombing all Palestinians?
Oops. Right? Oops. Yeah. Indeed. Or that because
he supports Palestinians that he might be killed?
I mean, there's no way to make that
not seem ridiculous.
But you have to realize, this same statement
has been made by people all over the
place. Fetterman was 1. Plenty of them.
Or or what's her name? They're walking by
constituents. I think it was Code Pink where
they go, oh, do you have a pager
on you?
Because you support Palestinians? E
either they're this uninformed and ignorant, or they're
they are dangerous, and probably both.
But just recognize how disgusting that is. To
say that you're I I you could go
as far as to call it a threat.
I don't really take it that way. I
simply just think he thinks he's making some
kind of a clever joke, which is not
necessarily a joke. It's a statement
that is meant to kind of give him
a pat on the head from the people
that all hate Palestinians under the guise of
of Hamas.
And maybe he doesn't even know that. I
get the sense in some cases this guy
just does is a useful idiot in all
the cases, you know, the 2 party illusion
version of that where he genuinely thinks that
he's in the midst of it and he
got all the he's following along just right
and exposes ignorance. Okay. So let's play it
again. Play it all the way through. Call
the name of the no. No. You don't
call the name of the semi more than
anyone else's table. Yeah.
On. You just said it should be clear.
No. I did not say that. Hold on.
Let me let me just stop. You said
you have my beeper London as you said
it is a crime of the Palestinian Afamas.
Guys, let me ask you a Palestinian are
you? I suppose.
Am I worse?
That is completely apologize.
Say the Muslim guy should be blown up.
I apologize. On TV. Don't say don't say
then I apologize. You literally I thought he
said Hamas. I apologize. You didn't think I
said Hamas. I said I supported Palestinian rights.
Why? Because when you hear Palestinian rights, I
did. Why? Because when you hear Palestinian rights,
I did. Why? Because when you hear Palestinian
rights, I did. Rudy Giuliani said this yesterday,
so you're a great guest to be here
I'll defend Rudy Giuliani. Give me a reason
to go to the detainees. Give me one
sec. Today. And so at this point This
is what we're in now. This is America
in 2020. Will say. Forget the racism That's
right. Which I should die. I didn't say
that. You said what does what does beeper
mean? Don't give me a fuck. I didn't
say you should die. Why did you say
that by beeper noise? What did you mean?
What did you mean by the beeper? I
said, what did you mean by the beeper?
I said, what did you mean by the
beeper? I didn't you said, I hope your
people doesn't die. Ryan, stop talking. At least
have the guts to support your racist brother.
Hang on. I'm so sorry. Right. I mean,
frankly oh, I think it watches eyes. Bring
it back. This is this is what I
just so I'll leave it there because the
rest of it's a rant about the, you
know,
outraged re you know, I from I'm I'm
especially outraged, you know, it's that whole thing.
I'm the biggest victim in the room. The
point to me is that, ultimately,
what he said was obvious.
That he thought would be protected as it
used to be. Right? It's a disgusting statement
because it's simply you're conflating these people and
making it a a casual reference to murder,
to an open undeniable war crime that is
going to be remembered as an one of
the biggest deviations from what at least we
pretended we were guided by
that we saw in this time frame. Like,
they literally changed die like, what they did
there was set out an alarming example of
seeding in in technological infiltration
and just seeding these dangerous devices for 5
months across an entire population
and then executing them, killing mostly civilians
and pretending like that's somehow a justified thing.
And then for him to say that after
all of that information shows you that this
guy is either that uninformed
or okay with all of it or both.
And so bottom line is what he and
he as Mehdi is saying, which again, I
I just don't believe I don't trust that
guy. But he's right though.
Because he clearly tries to deviate from the
point. Oh, I thought you said Hamas.
Come on. So now you can't even stand
by. Think about how cowardly it is to
be on record, being recorded, we can look
at what you just said, man. And then
you think he said Hamas. So so either
you're that ridiculous that you actually hear Hamas
when he says Palestinian, which is certainly possible,
Or you are so afraid because suddenly you
don't have the the protection of the crowd.
That's what cowards do. Right? They know they
can fall back and you go, but oh
my god. Now I'm standing alone on my
own statement? No. I never mind. I'm sorry.
I didn't mean it. You misheard me. You
pick whatever you like.
This is what corporate media is packed full
of.
So too is the mainstream alternative media.
Cowards.
People that are willing to to challenge their
own integrity or ignore it, if they even
have it, in order to sell a narrative
or benefit themselves, enrich themselves on your support
for basically misinformation.
Not to say they have a right. That's
free speech. But I have a right to
call it out too. What we're dealing with
here is disgusting.
Not just the statement, but the fact that
the corporate media is so
transparently
a part of this machine that is actively
misinforming people on a regular basis, actively radicalizing
people on a regular basis, all of which
they dump onto you for trying to inform
people about what they're hiding from. And this
guy has the nerve to come out and
make that statement, and then the moment that
there's any resistance, he flees
like the coward that he is.
Now here is what other cowards had to
say on top of this despite how embarrassing
that was, despite how even the rest of
the room went after him. Brian Mast goes,
he spews out the semitism every day. No.
He doesn't. He talks about how Palestinians are
being murdered and how Israelis are okay with
that. Simple as that. You can look at
it for yourself. I don't like Mehdi, but
I'm not gonna lie about him. And this
is Brian Mast who comes immediately to the
defense of one of the most obviously wrong
things in this conversation. And the why?
Does he care about the dynamics of the
current situation of the state he represents? No.
No. No. He only screams about Israel all
day long Because that's what Americans want. Right?
Left or right?
Obviously not.
But he says he and calls Trump supporters
Nazis, which of course he does, which I
think is stupid.
But he goes, but good for God forbid
anyone make a joke in his presence. Oh,
so not a joke?
You realize he just apologized on the clip
you're sharing. Right? Because he is so willing
to gaslight for whatever he's told, or maybe
because he has an interest in gaslighting for
the genocide,
that he's gonna lie to you right on
the clip he's sharing.
A joke.
What's what's funny about it?
Is it it's not a joke when you're
telling him I hope you have your pager
because he says he present represents pal or
fights for Palestinians.
That is, in a way, in a a
veiled threat. Or simply saying that, well well,
because you do that, you might be killed
by an entity killing Palestinians?
I mean, there's there's no way to make
this. The point is Brian Mass is willing
to lie to you, willing to be seen
as the liar, willing to be seen as
the blind supporter for Israel against American wishes
or interests
for what?
What is he gaining?
I'm not suggesting I even know, but other
than APAC funding, but think about that. Think
about how far are these people, like Joe
Biden, destroying his career, what's left, or even
Kamala or Trump,
Doubling down on something that most people don't
want. For what?
In some cases, you could maybe point to
$100,000,000,000
from Adelson and other things, but it's hard
to see what really would cause them to
do this.
And he goes on to say, he and
CNN he got he and CNN got triggered
worse than a beeper than all of Hezbollah.
Worse by a beeper than all of Hezbollah.
I mean, it really is just sad. I
mean, I I even go off through all
this. This is this is not worth the
time. I real I did really get sad
to me to look at the people that
engage with these kind of people and realize
the diminishing support, you know? You you you're
signing your own You're you're committing to your
own history. Right? You what you're doing,
you will reap the consequences for. And I'm
simply meaning that from a legal perspective. And
I very much hope I'm right. Because people
like this deserve to be held accountable for
what they've allowed to happen. And it's happening
to Americans. As I pointed out about the
America that was killed by Israel that he
didn't care about, or the American Palestinians that
were killed that they did not talk about,
as they would scream about Israelis that were
being killed by Israel.
That's what Brian Mass cares about.
Here is Arsen Ostrovsky, the fake human rights
lawyer, pretending to fight for human rights while
he's gaslighting for genocide. He says, so just
to be clear, it's okay for Qatar Shill,
I guess he's referring to Mehdi Hasan, which
I'm just for you to decide. I you
I don't support him one way or the
other, so it wouldn't surprise me. And
unrepentant anti semite,
and Reddy Hasan, which is not the case,
to call someone on air a neo Nazi,
which okay. Let's let's break that down.
So just to be clear, he was not
making a casual joke and saying,
you're
Hamas. He was saying, in a broader sense,
whether or not it was HaMaid Hassan, that
Palestinians
should and might get killed because they're Palestinians
because that's the same as Hamas. And that
he, by simply supporting that, you know, might
have a page on you. That's not the
same thing as simply going, I think you're
a Nazi.
The the equivalent would be for him to
say, I think you're
a terrorist.
See? That's very different than the casual suggestion
of violence
for all people Palestinian, specifically him, if he
stands there. But you see, a human rights
lawyer would know that.
But he goes, but when this guy makes
an offhand joke that he hasn't even apologized
for. Realize. So they're defending something that this
guy went out of his way to apologize
for because they're desperate.
He's the one who gets taken off. Welcome
to CNN. And it's also about praising the
idea that the Trump side of this is
better because they support openly genocide. Right?
Really, the point is the same difference, but
but that's the game he's trying to present
there. Welcome to CNN and all of their
you know, for support the Republican side because
they are aggressively
and far more with the population of it
supporting Israel.
Now here's the actual guy. He says, you
can stay off CNN if you falsely call
every Republican a Nazi and have taken money
oh, stay on. Excuse me. You can stay
on CNN if you falsely call every Republican
a Nazi and have taken money from Qatar
and Foddy Media. He's leaning in to what
he thinks will save his career. Apparently, you
can go on CNN and and apparently, you
can't go on and make a joke. So
that's what they're going off of. I'm glad
Americans get to see what CNN stands for.
Right. So why would you apologize for a
joke, bud?
This Rudy Giuliani. Give me one
second. Give me one second. Give me one
second. Today. Forget the racist. You said what
is what is beef shit. Why did you
say you mean by the beef?
Stop talking. At least have the guts to
support your Sir, is it? Loss. No. If
there's another person inciting violence against And I
apologize.
That is completely I apologize. That's our
first block Say the Muslim guy should be
blown up on TV. I apologize. Don't say
don't say God, that's so disgusting.
Like this guy, it's just, you know, it's
not worth wasting more time on. But, you
know, from a social perspective, like if there
wasn't bigger news to get into, there's something
really worth breaking down here, more so than
this. Like, really understanding
how interesting it is that they would turn
on him in the midst of this conversation
when clearly there is a directive.
He exposed something he wasn't supposed to, and
I think that's over the overarching point. I
just find that fascinating.
And then she goes on and apologizes for
him afterward. I won't play that, but she
goes, I wanna apologize for what he said
and we'll probably know that we're not like
that. There is no way you can play
it is because I don't agree with that.
You're all like that. And what you've done
over this entire time has been the same
difference.
So I don't believe it. Any case, here's
the West Bank. On top of everything else,
it's also happening. Remember that conversation in the
beginning, how it was different? You know, it's
Gaza. We don't you know, Hamas isn't there.
Now suddenly, it's the same difference. And what
happened to Jordan? Where you at, Jordan? Remember
the whole big statement, big stance you made
about how if they cross this line, that'll
be war. Yeah. So much for that false
argument. The Israeli occupation forces in the Bethlehem
area are essentially a better armed wing of
the settler movement, says Andre x. Their main
task is to harass local Palestinians and push
them from their land to make space for
illegal settlements. Just so you understand, this is
the guy that got arrested alongside Jeremy Lofredo.
He was released. And he's still there. He's
still breaking this stuff down.
And he's he this is him in this
video getting dragged around by the idea. Where
is his government?
Don't people care whether it's American or otherwise?
These people are being beat up and arrested
and and
abused
by Israeli military for with no justification. Apparently
not. That has to tell you something about
the influence this government has over other things.
Right there, you can see that they they
threw a gas grenade at a bunch of
civilians because that makes sense, right? The border
gathering system, which means the same violence in
the West Bank as assault, harassing, and suppress.
And their goal here is to prevent Palestinians
from
gathering in their own private lands. Right. As
usual. Right? So they just decided to take
it. They're stopping them from collecting
olives on their land.
Because they're gonna take it for themselves. I
mean, this is not even contentious. It's happening
constantly right now. Or they're gonna burn it
down if they just don't want them to
gain from it.
It's so obvious to see, easy to prove,
covered across the world, that it's amazing this
is not a bigger conversation.
And this is what it looks like.
Last year, the settlers together with the police
managed to prevent a lot of people from
gathering all over the West Bank, and a
lot of people lost their entire livelihood.
And this year, they're trying to do the
same, and now they're not letting people even
close to their own heels.
Hello. I've been banned from the West Bank
for about 2 weeks by the settler police,
and today's my first day back. The ban
ran out. The soldiers attacked the activists, cleared
everybody from the area. One of them put
a flashbang grenade right under me as I
was sitting and stepped away, so I can't
really hear much right now. 2 activists have
been arrested, and there are lots of people
with minor injuries, me included. But the biggest
hit is economic one because the Palestinians here
are unable to gather olives in their own
private land, and that is their livelihood here.
Democracy. Right?
Here's Glenn Greenwald highlighting Herets. Again, should you
care to look Western got Western world? It's
right in front of you.
The Israeli paper, Heretz, has a new investigation
on the IDF's demented and sadistic terror campaign
in the West Bank. Going from home to
home, holding entire families at gunpoint, inserting devices
into rectums, now a common IDF theme, it's
not a joke by the way, all for
humiliation and sadism.
This
is literally a harassed article. Beatings, humiliation,
and torture. The IDF's night of terror at
a Palestinian refugee camp.
This is a daily occurrence right now, including
rape, including torture, including burning things down, including
everything you've heard about. And realize the ones
we showed you earlier, the Israeli settlers that
were praising the acts of burning homes down
and killing people because they're Palestinian. That's what
we're talking about. That's the hilltop youth. That's
what we're dealing with.
It's amazing.
Sadistic. Here's us all, Rod. Same thing. If
these if these headlines were in the western
media every day
this is about West Bank, by the way,
not Gaza.
Imagine if people were seeing this. The average
people who are already outraged about what's going
on, but they truly knew the breadth of
it. There's a reason that our work and
the rest of them are constantly pushed down,
not seen through other algorithm I mean, this
is the way the world works today.
The reason this stuff does not catch on,
there's no way it's possible unless there were
suppression of information.
Now, one quick segue overlap point then to
get into to finish with one stretch about
the 2 party illusion And what's going on
with the,
this the idiocracy.
It's incredible. I mean, it really is incredible.
That joke has always been there. Every year,
it seems to get a little bit more
eerily accurate.
But this is a point from kind of
the overlap. So Jerusalem Post highlights this.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,
leader of of Iran,
created a Twitter account in Hebrew to try
to inform people in Israel.
Twitter
suspended.
You know, because free speech. Right?
Of course, they go bad guy, terrorists. Okay.
Whatever.
That could apply to anybody you're talking about.
He's a leader of a country. Why does
every other leader of a country get that
access? But okay. Because the problem is, you
don't want his voice in the conversation.
I'm sure plenty of people would solve it.
Largely, probably, Republicans are gonna lean into the
idea because bad guy. Okay. Well, then just
admit you don't agree with free speech. I
can't stop making this point.
If you believe in limited speech, then just
own that
and state that.
But to continue pretending, like going on with
and ignoring censorship, whether this or me or
anybody highlighting
Israel genocide.
Or in fact, other examples that have nothing
to do with any of that, that I've
shown you. People that have January 6th or
that have never been let back on or
people from COVID 19 overlaps that are occasionally
still censored that we don't talk about.
Other than on this show and a few
cutouts or,
cut few,
standouts.
The point is that you believe in limited
speech, and you're okay with that.
Pretending you don't is just dishonest.
Because this, whether you support them or not,
is no different than censoring anybody else. But
they already do the same thing.
And on top of that, I mean, I'm
pretty sure that they have accounts. Why would
it be different if you made a Hebrew
account?
I mean, you know why. I don't need
to spell connect those dots. It's transparent.
So here they are. Twitter, Macarena, Elon Musk,
whoever it is, all together, stepping in to
suppress.
So keep keep lying to yourself if you
want to. The truth is there.
There is something I wanna point out that
Elon Musk keeps doing.
I've been I've already made this point a
few times, but it just keeps happening. So
Thomas Massi, and of course, without you actually
giving the tweet link because you don't want
to see the under conversation that makes it
about you and republic like, no. No. No.
You wanna make sure you just give the
one the one thing,
a la Twitter files, a screenshot of Thomas
Massie saying, where's the lie? In regard to
Glenn Greenwald saying, the US has no functional
president
and has not had one for months. And
it's barely noticeable and barely matters because there's
a permanent unelected machine that runs the government.
I I totally. Biden is a ridiculous dude,
and he's never been in control. He's a
the point is, if you stop short from
looking at the other side, then you're part
of the problem.
So he goes, bingo.
Elon Musk and his bot responses, I'm convinced
of. The point is that I said, there
you I said, that's you, bud. Bingo, indeed.
These clumsy side stepping posts of yours where
you highlight exactly what you and your Eugenesis
pals are what you highlight what you are
and exactly what you're doing, while acting like
you're outside of it, only makes it embarrassingly
clear that the opposite is the case.
And thank you. This has been really why
I wanted to show this. Uh-oh. She suggested
something Brian from my impact flicks did, which
we're gonna get into next.
Many such cases.
My point though is that
Thomas Massie, whether he's directed or rather Glenn
or any of them, whether they're aiming this
at the at him,
I find it interesting
that he's talking about an unelected power structure
as Elon Musk has been a part of
that billionaire technocrat elitist structure. He's in for
a long time.
And is right now working his way in
through some kind of Israeli funding. I mean,
it's it's crazy to see how this all
plays out. Now you can make your own
mind up for how this how this is
playing out. But it's the same point they
made the other day about the, you know,
standing with the resistance and now you're standing
with the machine. Well, okay. That's you, man.
You literally are fighting with Israel's genocide while
the resistance is being slaughtered. Or, I mean,
not reality, that's not the case. But they're
the Palestinians
are being slaughtered while the resistance is continuing
to fight back.
The bottom line is that you can't pretend
like you're the outsider. You are the definition
of an insider in every possible way other
than narrative. And quite frankly, very hollow,
not believable narrative.
But so here in the case of the
unlikely power structure, he goes, bingo. My point
is you're making this post to make it
look like you're just going, I agree with
that. So it somehow subconsciously gets set that
you're not that.
That's my opinion on it. I'm convinced that's
what this is. One more point before we
actually, 2 points before we go to this
video.
This is hilarious to me. Reuters reports on
21st. Hedge flow. Hedge funds?
Cyber Trump trades in equities, says JPMorgan.
You know, very much on the Trump side.
The bottom line is global hedge funds, global
hedge funds, have shown a strong preference for
stocks that could that could perform well if
Donald Trump wins.
Does this sound like an outsider to you?
We had the global hedge funds banking on
Trump winning?
Betting on Trump winning? What an outsider. Clearly,
he's gonna mix things up. Right, guys?
It's just it is embarrassing that anybody would
pretend that this is not obvious.
Secondarily,
here's another example.
Great hat, he says. And the hat says,
make or will fiction again. Do you realize
the people that are making these statements are
most you are most commonly, I would argue,
calling out people like you and the whole
structure and the idea that we're living in
this 1984 style world? Now, yes, there's a
section of the
republican conversation, like in any dynamic, and the
left does the same thing that kind of
co ops
part of that. Like, so is where like,
for example, do you know if you remember
correctly, and I made this point a long
time ago, that the idea of being woke
or rather specifically awake,
that was from the inter independent media. That
that came from a long time ago when
we were simply talking about the idea
that we were, you know, aware of, awake
to some of these manipulations.
So we and I think even woke to
a degree was being used, but it wasn't
about what we're talking about today. It was
simply saying that I see it. Right? I'm
awake. I could see through the lie, and
that got co opted by the left. Like,
just aggressively taken, and we're woke. And we
came in about woke politics. And now I
know even I would use it in the
sense of being like, you know, that's woke
in then like a derogatory term. By the
way, there's the woke right, there's the woke
left. It's the same difference. You'd say same
thing. It doesn't mean the exact same thing,
but it's the same exact thing from a
different perspective. You know, we've I've gone over
this a 1000000 different times. But so what's
funny to me
is that like this, you can see parts
of the grouping that would kinda take that
as if Trump and Elon are gonna do
that.
That to me is the machine co opting
things. But overall,
make Orwell fiction again
is
1984,
COVID, Trump, Operation Warp Speed, all of it.
Technocrat elitist controlling our world. I mean, that
is everything we're talking about. But he goes,
great. So we're supposed to subconsciously link. He's
the one fighting. It's it's I think it's
hey. Look. Even Linda chimed in. World Economic
Forum Linda said make it please make it
happen.
She's literally supporting the World Economic Forum. I
mean, come on, guys. How do you not
see through this?
Now, let's go into the 2 party illusion
of it all, Which obviously Elon Musk is
playing a central role in us. Oh, and
by the way, I forgot to point out
that I you oh, I mean, I'm I'm
I'll just show it right now really quickly.
We'll come back to this in one second.
An outstanding
article by Derek Rose.
Now I'm really proud of my I made
this picture. The background I grabbed, but I
made this picture just, you know, nothing too
complicated. Just
cropping out PNG
from a different, you know, image and so
on. But I'm pretty proud of that. It
looks pretty good. And so I used it
again for my show today because I figured
why not? I obviously, my show today has
the red writing on
it. Worth using twice, I would say. I
think it's hilarious. The point is to see
as he writes or rather the subtitle,
technocrats to my left, technocrats to my right.
Sort of a clowns to the left of
me, jokers to the right kind of a
game, but the point is that it's anywhere
you look.
The title is election 2024. Zionist Technocrats versus
Zionist Technocrats.
And it's pretty much mapped out right there
for you. And it's exactly what you're lit
it's it's you're getting the same thing either
way you go, which is pretty much how
this has always gone. That's what people like
us are trying to show you. And every
year, they've got the, this is so important
if you play if you decide to make
this the year that you recognize that. Hey,
no. It's too late. We'll never have an
election again. And then it's what's Elon saying?
Everybody. So if you might have been flirting
with the idea that, man, the same thing's
happening again. I'm gonna I'm just gonna push
back. I'm gonna, you know, like, oh, well,
you get driven back in.
So every year, how many years they've been
saying this? So right now, yet again, here
we are, where we can recognize that either
way you go, despite the narratives, you're gonna
get what the elitists want.
That's what we're trying to show you.
Now, I'm not saying that I have all
the answers, I've got things that I would
argue are solutions outside of that, and we've
gone over all of them many many many
times.
But it ultimately comes down to you using
that information as you see fit. And if
you still think voting is the solution, and
you really believe that, then I will support
that. I don't believe that's what most people
think.
I think that if you are engaging like
Brian's gonna make shockingly clear, with the full
breadth of the facts, and then just decide
to vote anyway,
that's giving up.
That's my opinion. I could definitely be wrong.
But I really want you to consider what
this looks like.
So let's go over this. For this is
the longer one, and there's one more clip
I'll show you. The whole thing is right
here, by the way. So check that make
sure you check that link out. I believe,
it's much longer than that. So he goes
to a Trump rally,
and comes at it from a 2 party
illusion perspective. Or at the very least, anti
Kamala, anti Trump. Right? So he comes at
it by very clearly pointing out the problems
with Kamala. We all agree. Right? And then,
okay, well, here's the thing. Similar problems with
Trump. What do you think about that? And
that's always a good way to go about
it because you start on common ground, and
then so you did a little bit disarming.
And he's not lying. He believes what he's
saying across the board.
But it's interesting to see how they respond.
So let's play through this. As he says,
Trump followers love when I expose harasite, cognitive
dissonance,
and hypocrisy. But watch what happens when I
do the same to them.
Feel about Kamala Harris supporters being corralled, corralling
their voters. Kinda like, oh, kinda like this.
This is kinda sheep like, isn't it? What
would Donald Because they made a point about
that. Right? But it's the exact same thing.
It's selective outrage. What Trump have to do
for you to withhold your vote from him?
Nothing. Nothing? Nothing. So you could literally put
Japanese Americans in prison like FDR did and
you'd be fine. You'd still vote for them?
Yes. Voting is simply, an act of picking
the lesser two evils.
So you're you're choosing the lesser evil?
Have to. There's no other choice. Sometimes you
gotta dance with the w. No. Not the
one you don't. Where's the American spirit? I'm
the only one against all you guys out
here. Right. American spirit. That's that's the point.
Like, don't don't we all see how how
sad this is? Like, this is supposed to
be the pinnacle of elections in the world
that they want you to believe? All our
politicians, regardless of the other side or whatever
side they're on, well, what we want you
to believe, we are the envy of the
world. Everybody loves our election. Really?
This is the envy of the world? Well,
everyone sucks, so I I guess what I
would want us to do. That's what everybody
is saying. And I keep trying to highlight
this like he's doing here. He's doing an
amazing job on this. It's not some side.
Most people,
even though they mostly support Trump, are in
this position where they're like, damn it. I
the shot, the Israel support, I just it's
all terrible, but I he's he's lesser than
her.
So if there were actual representation of all
the possible choices, they probably wouldn't go this
direction
based on that sentiment. But I I don't
know for sure.
These are literally
you're literally going, I'm going to this dance
and I'm gonna dance with the devil. I'm
gonna put my arms around him and he's
getting my vote. How do you how do
you justify that? But you're gonna vote for
a guy who's not only going against the
constitution. By the way, this is just kinda
the opening. You know, he he gets into
more engagement so you can see. Than that.
He's working with the Zionist international banking cartel
to devalue our dollar. Donald Trump said congress
should be controlled by Israel. He says a
lot of bull stuff. What? Wow. But that's
that's treasonous.
Alright. So so may he like, the hope
that he might just be lying?
Well, he says a lot that's not true.
It's kinda the the extension of that point,
But not necessarily untrue, but just that he
he may say it for a different 40
chess or so whatever you say he says
that you don't like, you just kinda brush
off because, well,
he, you know, that it's whatever. You fill
in the blank. That is one of the
biggest issues here. Both left and right. It
suddenly just becomes that, well, you know, there's
another whole another game going on and everyone's
bought by somebody. And, oh, that's that's what
you're gonna hear all day long. And do
you realize that Patrick Henry heard him saying
that? He'd be buying a rope?
Probably. You're gonna vote for him. Patrick Henry
would be buying a rope and and loading
his musket, and you're gonna vote for the
guy who wants Israel to control congress.
Probably. I guess I guess I am.
The biggest threat to this country ignorant people
who think
they're informed. And besides that, even if you
got informed on policy,
how do you know you're gonna be able
to trust the political psychopath who's making the
promises?
The answer is, you can't.
And historically,
you should be able to say, hey, I
can't trust Trump. I don't know him. I
have family members that I know that I
don't trust. Why would I trust Trump? Why
would I trust Kamala Harris? So we're gonna
get out here, and we're gonna talk to
some supporters of Donald j Trump and see
why
they're actually
voting for him. Ma'am, could you tell me
why you're voting for Donald Trump?
Because he's awesome. What makes him awesome? Here,
you can take it. Go ahead. Walk with
me. I'll walk with you. Because he's awesome
president and he's gonna get us back on
track. Okay. How will he do that?
Closing the borders. See, you can already tell
by your pause, that's far than anybody else
goes. Everyone at this rally is like, yeah.
Okay. No substance.
Now, I'm I'll say ahead of them since
I've stopped it already. I genuinely get the
sense that these 2 women, there's another one
coming.
You know, I can't over sure, but I
get the sense that they genuinely want they
believe in this. They're not bad people.
They genuinely want all these good things which
makes arguably makes them good people. The point
being that they just stop short because Trump
said,
I believe and I've been I've been trained
to see how evil she is, so therefore,
he's the other side so I trust him.
That's ridiculous.
Whether or not she's evil, which I think
they're both evil. The point is clear
that there's no substance. It's that he said
I believe in him. That's faith, guys. Now
it comes circle full circle about the point
of why religion is intertwined with these things.
Not to talk about it in the show
today. I talked about, hey, wake up this
morning. But I've talked about it a lot.
You know it. I'm a Christian. I believe
it's wrong to to conflate your religion with
your politics, or your specifically not politics, but
your journalism.
One's based on factual informed information, fact based
reporting, the other's based on faith. Now, I'm
not saying it's wrong. Do whatever you want.
But you can't expect me to believe that
you're always gonna be factual when at some
point, your faith will supersede those facts. We
all see that. And I wouldn't I mean,
that's the that ultimately, that's what a person
of faith would likely do.
That's more important to you. It is to
me. But I don't conflate those two things.
I don't allow my religion,
which is faith based, based on something I
can't prove, and I've said that before, which
in many cases irritates Christians,
with something that I'm proving based on facts.
They need to be separate.
That's my point. Because I know that that
would be something I care about more. Well,
I mean, I'm sorry to even say that,
because frankly, that's a hard line for me,
which would probably irritate people even more.
It's the you guys as you know from
this show,
facts,
the truth about the inform informa the these
things are cherished for me. So, anyway, the
point is still the same. When people are
out there conflating these things, re doing their
reporting while overlapping that with religion, I have
a problem with that. I think that is
dangerous and it misleads people often and possibly
is being done to deceive you. So my
point is back to that, the idea that
saying that you believe in him because he
said these things, that's faith. That's blind faith.
As Brian said, he's a family member so
he doesn't trust. How the hell do you
believe you know Donald Trump? Because they've framed
who you're supposed to think he is.
Alright.
How do you like Donald Trump?
And then of course, he hands it off
because, you know, there's no answer. Right? I
don't really know. I like him because I'm
supposed to. Here you go. Take the mic.
I love Donald Trump. Okay. Why do you
love him? We
love He's for us.
Okay. He's not for anybody else. He's for
us. Alright. Except Israelis though, but well, okay.
Keep going. And he'll fight for our country.
Okay. Why is he gonna fight for our
country?
Bring back the country that we used to
have. Okay.
You know, things were expensive.
You know, now when he was in office,
things weren't. Gas prices, groceries, everything's pretty much
tripled in prices. Okay. We want him back
to bring back the old
the old US. Okay. So for for just
out of gate, I mean, those those to
some degrees you're accurate. I mean, there's much
more to go into this and whether or
not it's one administration is hard. The bottom
line is the obvious
shut
the operation warp speed. Right? The lockdowns. That
is the drive of that engine. Now, obviously,
Biden continued the same things and then carried
out more war Ukraine funding. The point is
clear that this was all interconnected.
Just because we don't point to a number
that associates with the transfer of wealth took
place during COVID 19 or Trump's watch, which
was the largest transfer of wealth in history
from American history,
doesn't mean that it was not part of
what we're talking about. It's all the way
you frame these things. Now, nonetheless, the point
is I can obviously point out the destruction,
the absolute destruction that is Joe Biden's administration
on the on just that one point, but
plenty of others.
But that's it is
1 and the same. They're part of the
same operate. Now that aside though,
how do you know he's gonna bring these
things back? Again, because he said so. And
is it snapping your fingers? Do you just
do this and suddenly prices are back? That's
not how that works. The illusion that the
president somehow can dictate these things is an
illusion. It's a game because he promises the
world and rarely does any of do any
of them deliver on that. So here he's
comes back to faith. Let me ask you
some hard questions. Are you for the second
amendment?
Are you for the second amendment?
Yes. It's right. He didn't remember what it
was, which, you know, again, it's not I'm
not gonna make fun of somebody, but I
believe if you're choosing to tell me why
I should vote for somebody, you should know
what that is. Keep him bare arms shall
not be infringed. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I am
too because it says shall not be infringed.
So because I'm for the second amendment, I'm
against anybody who's
violating the second amendment like Kamala Harris. Kamala
Harris, you look familiar. Do you have a
do you have a YouTube channel?
No. No?
Kamala Harris is for red flag gun confiscation
laws. That's all I would need to know
about Kamala Harris to know that she's not
getting my vote because she wants to take
my guns. She wants to ban assault weapons,
whatever that is. But didn't don't you have
a problem with Donald Trump who wants to
also institute red flag laws?
Well Because he's not gonna take it long.
Not gonna write. But he ah, okay. So
same thing,
but I like him. He won't do the
even though it's the same conversation,
he won't do that thing. So, again, you're
choosing to trust a billionaire
oligarch.
I don't know why. It's it's it's it's
it's a the cult of personality, the very
same thing they they aim at each other.
You've going along with because you believe in
him, which I hope you're right. I really
genuinely hope you're right.
But that's a really dangerous thing to bank
your hopes on, especially while both of them
are funding genocide and arming and supporting genocide
and being influenced
by a foreign country. Institute of red flag
laws and a veteran died because of it
in the first, red flag law confiscation in
Maryland. Mhmm. Mhmm. I'm not sure about that.
Okay. So now we're deflecting. Right? I don't
know. That doesn't sound like something I agree
with. So I'm gonna pretend like it's not
real for the purpose of the conversation.
Well, it's very real. And the fact that
you don't know about that is quite alarming
because you're voting for this person, or at
least you're being told that that makes a
difference. At the end of the day, these
are just 2 major things that are obvious.
They're very publicized, and you just don't know
or don't care. Now I'm not trying to
hate on these people. Again, my point is
that I think these are they seem like
good people to me, but they're caught up
in
this cult mentality.
They are of the mind. This person is
you know, whatever they're framing it. I don't
wanna read any more into it. But a
lot of them move the mind, and it's
a kind of god given, rather sent by
god or driven, handed me, or something bigger.
That worries the hell out of me because
of how, obviously, that's not what we're dealing
with and how Israel is saying the same
thing about Trump.
It was in 2019 after the Las Vegas
shooting. You can you you can YouTube it
right now. Trump initiates red flag laws.
Okay. So why would you be forced somebody
who's anti second amendment? I'm try I'm try
really trying to understand.
I hate Kamala Harris. You can see by
how they already started to try to walk
away the moment the conversation turned. The nobody
here wants to hear any of this stuff,
which shows you that it's not really about
informing yourself. Now this is just at the
rally.
Out in the world,
you'll find more cons most conservatives are much
more receptive to at least have the conversation.
But this is the, you know, the core.
She's out to lunch. Joe Biden should be
in prison. But anybody who wants to touch
my second amendment, I am vehemently
against. Which is why I love Brian.
Right? He's up he's an objective, nonpartisan in
for researcher.
Man, you you this is the kind of
integrity we should all be fighting for. I
want somebody who's gonna challenge the thing they're
saying because it's consistent.
Or like like with Kyle Rittenhouse pointing out
the problem of the bump stock with Trump,
and he got eaten alive.
Cat turd, and the rest of those accounts
were like, you're excommunicated.
Was he wrong?
He he didn't even address whether it was
a correct point. You just you're not allowed.
And one of them even said, you're not
supposed to do this right now. We're trying
to win an election. Well, there's the point.
It's not about facts. It's not about the
truth. It's about winning.
That's alarming. But because people like this, I
don't believe they know that. Agree. So why
wouldn't you be for Donald initiates red flag
laws?
Okay. So why would you be for somebody
who's anti second amendment?
I'm try I'm try really trying to understand.
I hate Kamala Harris. She's out to lunch.
Joe Biden should be in prison. But anybody
who wants to touch my second amendment, I
am vehemently
against. Agree.
So why wouldn't you be for Donald Trump
who do you remember the bump stock bans?
No. No. He initiated bump stock bans which
unilaterally
criminalized
a 1000000 Americans who held a piece of
plastic, has everything to do with the second
amendment. Why wouldn't you be against Donald Trump
for that?
I don't know. And were you were you
for operation warp speed?
Operation warp speed. That's that's you know, the
the Pfizer Moderna shot, the COVID thing? Were
you for that? No. Because he calls himself
the father. He's literally calling himself the father
of vaccines, and he's still pushing the vaccine
as a a miracle from God. Yeah. Right.
And
what?
I don't think so. You don't think he's
doing that? Gosh. It's so crazy. The the
the willful
disregard.
Yeah. I'm gonna bring up 2 of those
just so you guys can see them just
for the possibility that some of you might
think that that's not true.
Let me grab this one too.
Oh, I thought I had that.
Well, I'll grab it while I'm looking.
Oh, shoot.
Oh. You don't think the thing were you
for that? No. Because he calls himself the
father. He's literally calling himself the father of
vaccines, and he's still pushing the vaccine as
a a miracle from God. Yeah. Right. And
what?
I don't think so. You don't think he's
doing that? No. Oh,
what are you what are we saying here?
I I don't think I misunderstood your question.
Okay. Donald Trump is pushing the vaccine still
to this day. He calls himself the father
of the vaccine. Why would he get your
vote in light of that? I don't agree
with that, but I don't agree with everything
he does. Mhmm. I don't either. What what
would Donald Trump have to do for you
to withhold your vote from him?
Nothing. Nothing? Nothing. So he could literally put
Japanese Americans in prison like FDR did, and
you'd be fine. You'd still vote for him?
Yes. Hey. If you like this content, it's
just the first portion in a longer video.
If you wanna watch the rest of it,
check out my YouTube channel, the disturbing illusion.
Yeah. So he it looks like he made
a new one. I haven't seen that. I'm
still I'm still back in the high impact
Flix days. That's that's his main platform. But
Brian does amazing work, guys. He really does.
And, you know, as as someone says the
chat, you know, there there's the
crowd.
Right? It's like it's like the the CNN
point. Right? They're so used to having the
safety of the crowd, of what you're allowed
to think and say. And that's both sides.
And to some degree, that's shifting. And I
argue that's why we're in this position. That's
why we're being rushed into some final solution,
if you will. Like, and I don't mean
that in the sense of murdering everybody. I'm
just saying, like, this is going to be
ending
an era.
And I'm worried that once we go into
this, that we'll we'll be past the point
of stopping what's kind. I mean, I don't
wanna be, you know, fear mongering.
But this is not a hypothetical thing. You
could look at all these pieces coming together.
So in case you just didn't know all
of what Brian pointed out, here are the
2 cases. Now, again, there's a lot more
than these clips.
So it's not just some one off where
you can explain what he meant. It's true
and easy to prove that he still supports
the injection to this very day. And clearly,
whereas the bump stock ban, whether it is
saying take the guns first, do process later,
whether it's saying that free speech, show the
peep too many people are idiots. These are
all on the record.
The firearms
first and then go to court because that's
another system. Because a lot of times, by
the time you go to court, it takes
so long to go to court
to get the due process
procedures.
To go to court would have taken a
long time. So you could do exactly what
you're saying, but take the guns first, go
through due process second.
Okay.
It doesn't matter the I mean, the context
always matters. But you have to realize that
saying that,
whether it's about terrorists, whether it's about the
point is the whole point of due process
I've even had to argue with people that
claim they support the constitution.
Is that that is supposed to the government
can always claim you're a terrorist. The government
can always claim that you're whatever makes sense
for them to justify their actions.
That's why it was created.
The or rather outlined, enshrine enshrining our inherent
rights. Because the reality is whether you trust
them or not, at some point, somebody will
abuse it. That's why you could say, well,
due process exists so we can go through
that before you just take because otherwise, that
happens. Then you could sweep them all up
and say, okay. We'll deal with it later.
Oh, turns out we were wrong in 50%
or all of them.
To pretend that you to anyone that argues
that that makes sense means you either don't
understand your rights or that you're okay with
authoritarianism as long as you agree with the
outcome.
That's wild. Here's the shot.
Actually, here. Let me do this one first.
This one is the,
the idea of free speech people. People arguing
free speech in regard to shutting down the
Internet or stupid people. Again, it's it's not
the context changes everything. But realizing that this
statement, no matter how it's made,
shows you his mindset. And sure, could've changed
by today, but his actions prove that's not
the case today. Because we're losing a lot
of people because of the Internet. And we
have to do something. We have to go
see Bill Gates and a lot of different
people. Oh, how much has changed?
That really understand what's happening. We have to
talk to them maybe in certain areas closing
that Internet up in some way. Somebody will
say, oh, freedom of speech. Freedom of speech.
These are foolish people. We have a lot
of foolish people.
That's wild.
To the I mean, to this day, I
blows my mind. That I I think I
think I'm I forget it. 2015, I think
somebody said the clip is from the point.
It's an old clip. So for the relevance,
the point is that it's not he could've
changed his mind by now, of course. But
think about saying that at any point in
time and acting like you I mean, the
reality is despite whether he could've changed, his
actions continue to show this. We're gonna remove
the Jew haters from the country when all
we're talking about is by and large Palestinian
supporters that are being framed that way. And
even if they did hold a racist opinion,
that's their right, constitutionally,
to have what you think the way they
want to say what they think. And we
have the right to say you're a disgusting
person, but they're gonna
deport them. And, of course, they all won't
make it about jihad and foreign. Well, the
point is clear that they've already highlighted all
of these people. Musk himself has said, you
should and we'll get into the flag point
in a second. Again?
The idea being that they have a Palestinian
flag, they should be deported. They've said all
of these things. Right there, he's saying that
we should shut down the Internet. No matter
how justified you think it is in some
way with Bill Gates, of course, that by
objecting to that because free speech, he thinks
you're a stupid person.
Just recognize the reality. Now here's the thing
that they just couldn't wrap their mind around.
Died under COVID this year, by the way,
under Joe Biden Right. Than under you. And
more people took the vaccine this year. So
peep Even though she's really trying to give
him an opening to lean it and dump
it on Joe Biden, he doesn't. His hubris
gets in the way. People are questioning how
the vaccine work, but Yeah. Some people aren't
taking. The ones Wow. The ones that get
very sick and go to the hospital are
the ones that don't take their vaccine. But
Life. It's still their choice.
And if you take the vaccine, you're protected.
Look. I mean, can you believe that so
this is not that long ago. And he
says this to this very day. He still
owns that. How can you not know that?
When the when one of the focal points
of this entire thing is about the idea
of health and RFK Junior and make America
healthy again, you don't know that?
How this is my point. Like, okay. All
we have is these 2 people so far.
But the point is, nonetheless, these are people
that are immersed in this conversation.
How do they not see this? How is
that not the most obvious example of algorithmic
control? They are in a chamber whether they
want to be or not. I'm willing to
bet you at this point in time, whether
they try to seek outside of it or
not, on that platform anyway, you end up
being driven right back into you this is
why they don't even know you exist. A
lot of us out there, despite how prominent
or not prominent, people in independent media, the
genuine independent media,
There's reasons this stuff just does not go
any further than a certain level. Because if
you don't see this, if you don't know
that, he is pro he says this at
his rallies.
And these people are like, what? I don't
believe that.
Guys, we're in a very dangerous time. We
need Initiate operation warp speed with Sorry, that's
the same clip. I hit it on accident.
We're in a very dangerous time is the
point.
Oh, no. This is the second one. So
let's go ahead and play this one. So
this is the follow-up clip from Brian. There's
a bunch of these, but this is just
the one that stood out to me, which
I think is interesting.
Here we go. Initiate operation warp speed which
killed
millions of people with a clot shot and
he still is pushing it. Brave to be
screaming like that. I mean, all these people
that that I would suggest that I mean,
honestly, my personal opinion, you're gonna find far
more violence coming from the the left
response to things like that, like, at these
rallies, more so on the ones that but
really in both sides of this, it's usually
the agitators.
I well, I think we should always consider
that. Just like the right would consider that
being something, you know, done to them. The
same thing happened to the left. But I
do agree though that some of the people
that have been radicalized by that would act
out more in violence against somebody doing this
in one of their protests.
But nonetheless, it's still kind of like a
crazy you would somebody in any circumstance might
get outraged because they've been trained to to
react by saying something like that. Because they
they see this person as, like, a, you
know, a savior
in some cases. I I can't speak to
the majority, but I've speak spoken to so
many Republicans that see this as that, again,
that kind of overlapping conflation of god. You
see? I mean, I've seen people, like, frankly,
again, my one of my family members that
genuinely believe that there's a god that there
he's being guided by god, not a joke.
Doesn't that alarm people? It should.
Anybody got a problem with that? I got
a problem with that. I love America, and
I don't want him to die from the
clot shot. Donald Trump doesn't mind though.
Any argument with that? No. I guess it's
just me against the crowd. You're voting for
the father of the vaccine. Let's talk about
this. You're you're literally voting for the father
of the vaccine. Yeah. Kamala's evil, but father
of the vaccine,
giving record profits to Moderna and Pfizer.
And to be clear, I if I if
I remember
correctly, I don't I haven't seen him talk
about this explicitly so far, but in the
past, he's very much vote no one 2024
kind of a mindset.
So just to be clear, I don't believe
he's are he's not advocating come all as
a better choice there. If you listen to
him talk, he's based seeing the same thing
we are. They're the same
negative choice. And you're gonna vote for that?
Kamala Harris wants to take our guns. Donald
Trump wanted to criminalize Americans through bump stock
vans. Now who are you voting for? Donald
Trump. Why are you voting for an anti
second amendment tyrant? Wait. What does that mean?
Who controls monetary policy?
Presidents? Congress? Wow. The Supreme Court? Federal Reserve?
Excuse me.
Guess who's still gonna be in power
whether Trump wins or Kamala wins? The Federal
Reserve. And don't forget, they're just the hedge
funds, global hedge funds are like Trump's the
one. We should bet on that. Right? Or
the point that Trump a while ago said,
you know, and the Fed, JFK,
911, lock her up. And, like, none he
just was tapping in to the momentum over
the time. Now it's different.
But he tricked a lot of them to
think he was the one gonna expose all
that. None of it happened.
Guess who Kamala's gonna work with? The Federal
Reserve. Who's Trump gonna work with? The Federal
Reserve. What's the problem? We're all voting for
the Federal Reserve. You could turn just about
She said you're at the wrong rally. See,
they don't even grasp.
Anything against him in their minds has to
be left.
He's not. He will call out come all
in the same way just because this the
point is similarly with me and what I'm
doing right now. I get all these people
that go, we say what you're doing. You're
a secret lefty. You know? It's like it's
just how many times across the years have
I pointed this out? 30 seconds ago, I
was a secret republican fighting against the the
shots in for COVID 19. Now I'm a
secret lefty. The point is, I consistently stay
in my position with my, I stand by
my principles and what I believe, and the
the 2 party illusion oscillates around me. I
I it's like a lot of us that
actually stand
by our principles
and don't let the 2 party illusion dictate
what we can think that day. And I
don't think that's the majority, to be clear.
I really don't.
But it's just my point is that he
I I would come out and say something
about this or highlight the Trump issue and
they secretly argue I'm just trying to work
for Kamala. And it's like, my god. You
know, I mean, I almost get why you've
been driven to think that, but look at
what I'm saying. Look at the substance of
what we're doing. Somebody even said, oh, look
at your timeline, and there's not a single
negative thing about come on. Well, it's it's
actually not true, by the way. But the
point is that as I've said repeatedly, if
you listen to my work,
that there's a reason. And I see them
all as the same thing, and I'm aiming
at the thing that I think is the
biggest threat to you right now. But I'm
often and by the way, I'm kinda jumping
one point ahead.
Derek's we're we're putting up an article tomorrow.
I might or I think maybe later tonight,
called why you shouldn't vote for Kamala Harris.
And we're gonna do a similar one about
Trump. The point is trying to highlight that
we are logically consistent with this, and we
don't want you to engage with either of
the Zionist technocrat supporters.
But that's where people kinda lose it because
they just don't know what else to do.
Start thinking about what else to do. Think
about what you can decide to do outside
of that. And if you can't think of
something, find something.
Now, the only reason I'm not going into
it because it's a whole conversation. I've talked
about the possible third party, the vote pack,
the idea of abstention. The I mean, Derek's
main point of exit and build a bigger
conversation, it's not just about moving into the
woods. It's about truly finding other
systems outside of the current structure. I mean,
again, there's so many different ways to go
into all those things that show you that
simply falling into line with 2 terrible choices
could not be the there's not a worse
option on the table in my mind.
Anybody in on a red flag law. I
know. And Trump is for it. Anybody in.
Federal Reserve. What's the problem? We're all voting
for the Federal Reserve. You could turn just
about anybody in on a red flag law.
I know. And Trump is for it. He
initiated in 2019 after the Las Vegas shooting.
What do you think about that? Kamala wants
the same thing, by the way. So? He
was willing to incarcerate people for a piece
of plastic. He sat next to Dianne Frankenstein
and said, I like take the guns first,
due process second. Allow due process, so no
one's rights are trampled. They're like take the
firearms first.
Taking the guns early. Take the guns first.
Go through due process second. Comment on that?
No. No, man. No. No. Alright. I bumped
that clip for the guys in the video.
My bad. We're still gonna vote for him.
Absolutely. That's see that? That right there is
the cognitive dissonance. Right. They say they're for
the second amendment, but then they vote for
an anti second amendment guy. Come on. Right?
Everybody's owned by someone. He was he was
exactly. Everybody's owned by someone. So there's your
final cop out. Right? So once you finally
get exposed with the or, you know, push
to admit that this isn't what you pretend
you're voting for, well, everybody's got some oh,
well, you know, it's always something. Well, there
must be an explanation, you should say. Right?
I'll just pretend that there's something that makes
that all make sense because that's what I'm
supposed to say out loud. What do you
mean everybody owns by somebody? That's crazy.
That means you've given up. That means you've
accepted this oligarch
driven system
of powerful people dictating who you're allowed to
choose from. You openly say that, and that's
supposed to be the adult in the room,
that we're supposed to be the the ones
highlighting that we've been hijacked
by larger dynamics than pretending we're in control
of the we're the ones that are black
pillned.
I just don't understand. Like, I I can
understand why you might feel like you have
no other like, that you might I I
don't agree with it. But I can understand
why you might fall back into voting because
you just can't see another solution.
But realize that you I mean, at least
admit that you are being forced to take
this choice because they've created a dynamic where
you don't have any choices.
I mean, it's just that's not one side
or the other, guys. That's your government.
Hey. Tell me about $6,200,000,000,000
stimulus package. I'm not gonna I'm not doing
your points because you're a retard. Give me
something logical. You just said I didn't touch
you. I'm not touching you. Touching you either.
You touch that. So what?
I'm not touching you. Don't be I'm not
don't be a pagan. Yeah. You are. You
know I got Don't touch that. Free number.
Yeah. See, there again, in his mind, he's
the lefty snowflake.
So we're gonna make it not not you
know, let's pretend like that's not a you
know, the idea of personal body autonomy. The
idea that you're not supposed to like, this
idea is supposed to be something that is
more about the libertarian
conservative. Like, the idea of touching his personal
body is supposed to be a you crossing
a line. Right? That's the idea that you
have the right to to respond. I can
fight back. I can
but now him saying don't touch me is
somehow, oh, you're a baby. Like, it's just
these people have lost the plot.
Because you can only see things from left
and right.
And he's already decided this guy is somehow
you're a stupid, You mean the factual points
about bump stocks or the vaccine or any
number of rights that you can prove are
not going and that's what he's
somehow deceiving people?
Yeah. It's just it's just it's sad to
me. It genuinely makes me sad because, again,
this guy seems to be not so much
the guy the women that, like, I think
are trying to be. I think this guy
still believes he's right, though,
while he's embarrassingly wrong, not in the sense
of voting for Trump, but that the idea
that this is somehow not things you should
care about, whoever you choose to endorse.
Oh, tard. Tard. I just won. Shut up.
Hey. Welcome Yeah. Really really intelligent, mature. Right?
Again, that's the paradigm. That's partisanship. That's not
left or right. It's the obvious reality of
people that have chosen something that you can't
intellectually defend. And then when you get pushed
to point about talk about it, you lash
out like a child. That's the left and
the right, guys. Partisanship.
Back to another episode of here's the deal
slash the disturbing illusion. I'm Brian Young, your
host. Today, we're out here in Duluth, Georgia
at the Donald John Trump rally, and we're
gonna find out if what George Orwell said
in 1984 is true, that it's easier to
deceive the masses
than to convince them that they've been deceived.
Hey. If you like this con Same point
from before, make sure you check out his
work because he's doing amazing work. Here's the
main channel High Impact Flix.
Make sure you check it out.
Now,
this I find to be especially important. Here's
the article we already highlighted from Derek Bros,
Came out yesterday, election 20 24, Zionist technocrats,
1st Zionist technocrats. Now he does a great
job. 1st, breaking down for you what technocracy
is going back to Elon Musk's father and
the reality of Technocracy Inc, and how why
why that's not an alarming reality for people
in the right calling out technocracy, I have
no idea. But overall over overall showing you
the worries of the worry the the problematic
issue around this and how this is really
just a new shift in power to control
you in the same way, but goes over
Kamal Harris, the technocrats.
Eric Schmidt,
Bill Gates, George Soros, or rather specifically Alex
Soros through that
whole persona,
Alex Karp.
And I on the image actually, that that's
what I that's why I show, you know,
I kinda break it down that way. Right?
So the left to the right.
And then he goes over to the other
side, showing you Peter Thiel and
Elon Musk. And by the way, here's Alex
Karp, alongside
Peter Thiel. Work with Palantir for Israel, so
just make sure to see the intersection there.
Or here's Peter Thiel, you know, being asked
about the issue of working funding Israel and
he just kind of stutters through some ex
we've played it for you before. Just showing
you that there is a weak point there.
And they and they're they're not used to
having to defend that. Elon Musk, obviously,
Miriam Adelson,
and generally Silicon Valley showing you all these
different, you know, tech billionaire aspects that are
funding through lots of different mechanisms. Timothy Mellon,
Nicole Shanahan, the very, very, very wealthy former
vice president of RFID Junior, and just the
illusion of choice. It is an outstanding article.
Make sure you check that out. Again, he
just pointed this out saying, yeah, tomorrow, the
article will be coming out for reasons not
to vote for Kamala Harris.
Now I just wanna point this out. I
wrote this down so I don't forget. One
of the main objectives now this is hypothetical.
I I just I pointed this to put
this in there so I didn't wanna forget
to just bring this thought up. That I
think we should consider.
I don't necessarily think this is the case,
but just simply, like, the idea that there's
always multifaceted agendas and I think it's always
entertaining, if not, insightful
to consider
you know, kind of reshuffle how things might
have gone. Like, right now, I think it's
obvious we kinda have a a map of
what we think COVID 19 was about. Right?
Simply pointing out that we should consider that
one of the main objectives of COVID, if
not the main point entirely,
was simply to drive us to call for
technical experts
to run things.
Right? So we're coming through a point or,
which otherwise would be called technocracy. So we're
at a point now where,
obviously, we're seeing this drive. I mean, we
we're gonna get more into it. I've already
made a bunch of points about it. It
focuses on different shows.
But there's some I'm I'm been doing background
research around Prospera and and a lot of
these things is fascinating. And the fake libertarian
city, the technocratic overtake of Honduras, it seems.
My point is there's a lot of weird
examples. And I'm seeing technocracy being put forward
as the logical conclusion to the current reality.
Not really saying that, but think about how
obvious that is. So during the COVID 19
op,
what did we really what are the what
are the main things that happened? Well, we
have never seen more resistance to almost almost
in a way that's over the top on
net you know, not not the logical response,
but over the top to just go science
is bad. But like a resistance to science
in general, a resistance to doctors in general,
even medicine, even hospitals, like and I'm I'm
right there with most of these things. Even
if it's like an irrational thing, I just
I'm like, I just can't trust that they'll
act with good intention or logically.
But now we're at a point where, like,
okay. Well, if we can't trust these things,
well, the idea would be to create a
system. This is the technocracy ploy
of engineers and scientists and the doctors, and
they would lead us because it's not politicians.
It's easy to see why in in one
in one in any cases, that is logical.
Because politicians are simply deceivers today, and we
all know that. But now, we can see
how the same difference would go with the
technocratic push.
But it's interesting to consider whether the COVID
19 ploy was simply to set us up
for this next stage.
Worth considering.
Again, I mean, I'm not even saying that
that would be where I would land, but
it's something that does fascinate me and does
line up. Now lastly, I on this segment,
I really want you to check this out.
Now this is Derek's from specifically from here's
his actual page from the the conscious resistance,
which is Derek's own platform.
Is Donald Trump the lesser of evils with
Derek Rose and Ian Carroll?
Now I wanted to make sure we got
this much reach as possible because this is
fantastic.
It really is something special. And this I
I just simply titled it Derek Rose Debates
Ian Carroll, is Donald Trump the lesser of
2 evils? Now, I says some really really
ridiculous person online was already assuming before the
with the after, like, you know, clearly he
hadn't watched it yet because there wasn't enough
time for him to even watch it after
I posted it.
But the point being is this is not
advocating for not voting for Trump, but voting
for Kamala. If you read only the title
and assumed, I can see how you'd ignorantly
make that assumption. But if you read it
I'm just I'm speaking to that person by
the way. If you if you actually watch
it rather, you can see that it's and
it's it's really well done, actually from both
of them.
This is really about trying to understand the
position that we're coming from and whether from
you know, basically, if you wanna get into
debate format, like,
Derrick Brose's premise is the idea that
they're the same. They're both evil, and voting
for both of them brings you to the
same position like we're talking about. Ian Carroll's
point is ultimately that Donald Trump is the
lesser of evils and therefore the one you
should vote for. And it's it's it's a
good conversation because, I mean, it really cuts
to the quick of the whole point.
It's really well done. Now I wanna make
sure I to shout out is is Derek
did an amazing job. Like, I I I
was honored to be working with him in
this context because it's something that
set a new tone for me. Or really,
just it should for everybody. This is how
debate should go. This is what debates are
supposed to look like. Right? I mean, even
heated debates can still be cordial, can still
be amicable.
Because the whole point of a debate is
to try to find some kind of a,
you know, whether it's a common ground, maybe
that's not always possible, is simply trying to
understand
I mean, really, you can't be a good
debater if you don't fully understand why they're
making the arguments they are, even if that's
defending and hiding genocide.
You have to understand where they're coming from
to be able to debate. In fact, try
to fight for their side of the argument.
Not that you mean that or believe in
it, but it it opens your mind to
seeing from their perspective. And that really applies
more to things that are more benign, obviously.
But it so my point is
the way that both of them did this
was very well done. Very
level headed, calm, let people speak
while challenging these points. And I really again,
Ian Carroll himself, like, it just it was
the way they did this, I wanna praise
Ian for the amount of the the way
that they did this in a very amicable
way that I think is going to inform
a lot more people really from both perspectives,
but, of course, I argue that what Derek
did really highlighted that there was no lesser
of evil. And then ultimately, it comes to
the point where Ian decides he's gonna vote
for Trump anyway,
and and that's what he believes. And again,
I I get the sense that that's what
he believes. Now, of course, you could argue
he's a shill or he's a liar. I
mean, it's yeah. I just I don't see
that that anything is possible and there's plenty
of reasons to consider that. But, nonetheless,
my impression on this is that he is
I mean, even there's a lot of points
where he's saying, you know, I'm not hasn't
been doing this as long as you have
Derek and that I think, you know, he
praises his work and says, you know, and
that's not to say that that's necessary every
time, but it's showing you a level of,
just maturity on both people's sides of this.
Now, again, enough on that. I just think
I really want people to watch this and
kind of
know that there's a better way to go
about this even when you aggressively disagree on
a certain point. But my point is to
end again that I I can respect somebody
who,
even if I think they're wrong, stands by
what they believe in, what they think is
the right choice, and, you know, whatever it
is. If you think that's what he did,
and I think that's what the video does
demonstrate. So I I pointed this out on
both the Substack and on TLav,
and I think it's worth watching. I argue
again that I think it kind of demonstrated
our point. I think Derek did an amazing
job breaking this stuff down and ultimately comes
to the point where you just kind of
hope that Trump will be the better choice.
And again, I get that. But if we're
realizing that it's like we've been saying, that
it leads you to the same point, and
all it is is hope, it's a very
dangerous thing to lean into. We need to
start seeing how we can change this for
the future, not just
hope for something a little better from the
scraps of the table of our authority, our
rulers, our dictators.
Which I know is not how everyone views
that, but at the end of the day,
when you know it's dishonest or lesser of
evils and you're still partaking, that's simply consent.
That's all it is.
Now, here's what Jimmy had to say, this
is a clip going into the 2 party
illusion point of this.
Right? Where where we are Oh, wait. Make
sure I didn't,
oh, that's right. Okay. I was making sure
I might I was making sure I didn't
have this out of order. So Hotspot covers
this. He put this up on, yesterday. And
he says, Jimmy Dore explains to Tucker Carlson
the importance of not normalizing genocide, which is
interesting because clearly there's a very, like despite
what you like, well, when he says this
with Jimmy or rather the audience goes because
he let Jimmy say these things, therefore, Becker
which is not an invalid point. But ultimately,
they're all still supporting blindly the Republican party
and Trump himself, which are supporting genocide.
So it's kind of hollow from Tucker's perspective
if you wanna pretend that means that he's
gonna
I'll get into more points in a second.
But
he says, they say for Palestine, Trump is
going to be worse. But this is, I
this is, I mean, pretty dishonest to go
with my honest opinion. He said, what's he
gonna do? Dig up the dead babies and
kill them again? I mean, come on. That's
just simply ridiculous.
How about he's gonna continue murdering them in
Palestine?
Or murder them in Lebanon? Or keep bombing
people in Iran? Or realize that what if
you can acknowledge that supporting this in any
stretch is genocide,
then just because Trump is coming into it
after it's already been done, therefore, he can't
make I mean, that's a pretty crazy argument.
I get the sense that he has decided
Trump is the one whether that's for reach
or because he believes it, and that's just
be and but, see, my point is that
you have to be if I were coming
for the position of this is genocide,
I would say, I'm gonna choose to vote
for Trump because I x, y, and z,
but I can't get past the fact that
he supports that, and I hope that he's
wrong or hope it's not the case. But
you can't pretend
like he doesn't blatantly support the same thing.
He's even said that he's gonna allow them
to finish it. That's what he said many
times.
To pretend that means anything other than allowing
them to keep doing what they've been doing,
which Jimmy knows well,
is willful ignorance. I'm not saying he's doing
that. But to simply say right there that
he
will be worse or not, I mean, it's
a it's a it's a wish it's a
guess at best.
I prefer not to lean into or guess
around the idea of murdering children. But it
goes on to say, there is a no
lesser evil. You're just voting for straight up
evil and doing mental gymnastics to make yourself
feel better about it. Oh, well, okay. Now
I agree with that point, but when you
hear it in the context of the conversation,
it goes the other direction. My point is,
exactly. So if you're pretending that Trump is
the lesser well, that's not the key. You're
still voting for evil. Now it's funny to
say that point to somebody who all are
supporting Donald Trump. Let's listen to the clip.
They're the same people who can
turn their head at the, genocide happening in
Palestine
and, say things. I mean, I've I would
turn to people who are liberal their whole
life. By the way, the point that he
kind of went away from is referencing most
of the people he's talking to right now,
which I kinda think is why he deviated.
People that can watch the genocide and go,
who cares? Or ignore it, or pretend like
it's not okay, or say, we don't that's
what they deserve.
That's not the majority, I argue, I hope
anyway, of the conservative conversation, but it's a
huge part of the Republican conversation. From, like,
so you stand with the people of Palestine.
Right? And they're like, Kamala is not the
president of the Middle East. They'll say things
like that. Right. I agree. That's crazy.
Now just sort of like a like like
a few people have kind of carved out
this, you know, coming at it like I'm
the democrat that's pointing out what the democrats
are doing wrong and sidling up next to
the republicans. And I you know, I get
it. There's a ways but at the end
of the day,
it's not objective to only call out one
side when the reality is that both sides
are doing that. Now I'm sure you could
level criticism at me for similar things if
you think that's what's happening. I don't believe
that. Maybe he doesn't. I'm just being objective
about it. Maybe he believes to be at
the end of the day,
both of them
are doing exactly the same thing. And I'm
just talking about this one conversation, and I
know he knows that. I've had interviews with
him where he makes that case. So that
makes me wonder why this is being stated
this way. And I'm like, what? But she
is funding it, and it's like, well, Trump
is gonna be worse. What what is he
gonna do? Dig up? Trump, whether worse or
not, is going to continue the genocide.
So it's kind of a hard sell for
me to take seriously an argument that he
will I mean, so what you're arguing is
he can't be worse. There's no other way
to take that. They say, they'll be he'll
be worse. You go, what's he gonna do?
Dig up babies and kill them again?
So through a joke, he's suggesting that he
can't be worse.
Come on, Jimmy. Really? You know that's not
true. Of the dead baby? Now if there's
worse or not. Again,
genocide. The ongoing,
maybe the completion of it. Same difference. And
kill them again.
You know, if Trump is worse, then we
deal with Trump when that happens. But right
now,
you cannot reward
what the Democratic,
administration is doing, what Kamala Harris and Joe
Biden. You cannot Okay. So that's a fair
point there. Right? So the the idea that
and and this is interestingly enough, one of
the only points in this entire time frame.
Not just this interview, but like the entire
2024s legend. I'm like, okay. There's an actual
valid point
coming at this like, okay. We have a
current administration that we know is committing genocide.
Right? Then we have Trump who may or
may not, which despite the fact that it's
obvious that he's repeatedly stated he won't, maybe
something will change his mind.
So there's there's a valid point. Period. That
you could argue that you would vote for
the one that is at least not doing
Dennis. I got I can't disagree with that.
But I just again, for me, it's not
about just dict you know, basing it on
the last 4 years. It's basing it on
the reality of and, again, I I've had
multiple interviews with Jimmy. We've had similar talks
about this where we kinda laugh off both
together that this is an illusion, you know,
but yet here we are. Right? That the
voting process is stolen from us. I mean,
both sides have said this. The voting but
I I'm not gonna go on to that
again. You guys all know my opinion. If
you don't look up the different conversations I've
had. I'm very convinced that your vote has
been stolen from you
in a 1,000 different ways that both sides
will make a point about when it works
for them. But otherwise, you're violating democracy by
not going along with the system that they
30 seconds ago told you has been co
opted or stolen, or taken by Russia or
Trump lied about but who cares, right? Go
through the motions. So I just I find
that hard to wrap my mind around. And,
administration is doing what Kamala Harris and Joe
Biden, you cannot reward them with your vote.
You have to make them pay a price.
Okay. So if that's the case though,
this is my biggest problem with this. So
again, valid point.
But what that leads to is an easy
way, and again, I think this is what
we're living through, an easy way for the
2 party illusion to be used against you
on top of everything else. Right? So what
do they do? Oh, wait. Well, they did
terrible things. We have to go to the
Republicans now because we have to punish them
for the bad things they did. Okay. Republicans
come into power.
And same same argument. Right? Oh my god.
Love her for years. They've done this. They've
evaded that. They've killed these people. We have
to punish them by voting for the Democrats.
Right? Over and over, we oscillate around in
the same broken system. And not till we
realize that it's just your government pretending, giving
you shadows in the wall and making you
think that you're changing. They're just good. We
can keep doing what we've been doing. If
you take a step back and look at
your history without flavoring it left and right,
you'll find how shockingly it's a pretty linear
progression.
So
I'd argue he knows that. You have to
influence them. And that's why now all the
every Muslim mayor in,
Michigan came on, I pretty sure just endorsed
Donald Trump. Yeah. And so you Okay. So
here's what's insulting. And now this point's made
by everybody. We're gonna get into the rally
to finish over in a second.
And you got people like Howard Litchman and
there's, like, we're gonna fight jihad.
Right? Do you realize how many people in
that crowd would look at those people and
call them terrorists because they're Muslim?
Laura Loomer,
openly, a person that is endorsed by Donald
Trump, who's literally by him in certain circumstances.
I mean, come on. It's not I don't
have to convince anybody if you're objective, it's
obvious. That's not to say that everyone is
racist. I don't think that. But there's an
obvious part of this that has been radicalized,
I argue, by Zionism, Laura Loomer, who are
openly making these cases. So it's insulting to
act like we're, you know, don't you look
a couple of token Muslims support him, which
is not an talk a knock on them.
It's a knock on the idea that people
pretend that then means there's no racism or
the idea that that that everyone at this
rally who I thought it was supposed to
be about America screaming about fighting for Israel
are talking about fighting jihad and fighting terrorism
and them. And realize when they say all
the if foreign invader, they're talking about people
that support Palestine.
It's easy to prove.
So I just find this to be hollow.
Gonna you're gonna you're gonna wag wag your
finger at those people? I've seen people,
pry priority. They go, well, Trump's gonna go
house to house. I'm care I work with
immigrants,
and Trump's gonna go house to house and
kick them out. And I'm like, so your
prior Which is ridiculous.
I mean, it's obviously possible, but I don't
think it's a polite it's the same thing
we've talked about this morning about Whoopi Goldberg
and the, you know, separating families. I mean,
guys, it's it's this is hyperbolic
assumption. It's ridiculous. It's certainly possible and it
wouldn't surprise me, but from either side of
your government. But at the end of the
day, nothing suggests that that's gonna happen. Did
did the mass deportation? Yeah. That's terrifying. Whether
it actually happens, I kinda think it's all
a big hype.
But I do believe they're gonna go after
people that are anti Israel or simply pro
Palestine,
which could then mean that they're gonna try
to I mean, he's talking about Americans when
he says get rid of the Jew haters.
He says that very clearly.
So how do we misunderstand that? Right? But
in this case, to take that to the
extent that he's gonna separate black and white
Mary or it's just these and they're these
are all being stated.
I argue this is the ridiculous extension of
what is happening
from whether they know they're playing this role
or not to hide the truth of it
all, which is pretty alarming in the tone
right. But they extend it out to absurdity
to make you miss the point. Sort of
like, turn the frogs game, whatever. It's all
from either side, guys.
Every time you find something like that, one
of these people to drive you away from
the obvious truth.
The
the immigration status of migrants
over the literal slaughter of Palestinian children. That's
morally repugnant.
That's a fair point too. Right? But, again,
this is the same thing the right would
say that you don't get to dictate what
I care about. I care more about this
than I do about the foreign genocide. What
he's doing there is to say that they
care more about the immigration issue than they
do about the genocide. It's kinda the same
point. But, of course, Tucker's not gonna make
that point. He's gonna let it this to
me is Jimmy
playing the role of the pro. You know,
like, if this was in a different conversation,
let's say, with a left leaning candidate, I
argue he would have a little bit different.
It's not real I mean, it is kind
of an insult. I'm just being honest. But
I do I do think that Jimmy does
good work in many context, but I think
at the end of the day, this comes
down to, you know, pandering.
And as, you know, Thomas Frank said in
listen to the bro, you know, that when
you listen to these people moralize, it's stomach
churning. And that is stomach. It's just like
you're just bending yourself in a prep. There's
not so there's no red line. I have
a red line. My red line is genocide.
Oh, a lot of the Republican Party would
disagree with you, bud. And, you know Including
Trump, by the way. Kamala Harris could come
get my vote. You know? If she said,
hey. You know what? I'm not gonna do
I'm not gonna fund Israel anymore. That's their
problem or his something.
She won't do it. And so if you're
if you're willing to go along with that,
there's no doubt you're not voting for a
lesser evil. You're just voting for straight up
evil. Okay. So the difference on this
oh, where was it?
So that's not even what he actually says.
Right? So hotspot, I guess, misquotes that. But
he's
saying, ultimately,
that there's no doubt you're not voting for
the lesser evil. So playing into the lesser
evil. Right? The idea being that you're voting
let me just play it again to get
it clear. You're just voting for straight up
evil, and you're doing mental gymnastics to make
yourself feel better about it. Okay. So the
point ends up being that Kamal is worse.
That's the original point. That she's worse, he
at least might not or whatever, and so
you're voting for evil when he's the lesser
evil. So again, it just falls back into
the same comfortable dynamic that he's a little
bit less bad.
America. It just blows my mind that anybody
thinks that's something we should lean into.
But let's go through these. Again, pretending like
he's these Muslim mayors endorsed endorsed him,
which is interesting. I'm gonna make a point
at the end of this too about
the the whole ridiculousness
of claiming he's a Nazi
because of the rally. And what all the
Republicans are doing is going, look. Here's a
black guy. Here's this person speaking. How is
that supposed to be Nazis?
Funny how that point was made when we're
talking about the Palestinian supporters. Look. Here's a
Jewish person. Look. Here's a here's a Christian.
Or how are they a terrorist? Oh, they're
all part of the same thing. You know?
It's just it's always entertaining for me to
pile highlight the embedded hypocrisy of the partisan
arguments.
The point is it goes both ways, obviously.
Now here, we're talking about the idea that
these people are somehow, you know, because he
has these people endorsing him and ignoring the
fact that there's politicians that are endorsing him.
So the idea that they would they all
use these things as attributes to influence your
vote or your opinion of your vote. The
point is at the end of the day,
these people has stood up and screamed
about stopping jihad and fighting terrorism and working
for Israel and all these different things
that are literally
ramping up the idea that everybody and, again,
they're conflating all Palestinian
with fat terrorism.
So when you're pointing at them, your own
people that you're trying to radicalize would look
at them like they're terrorists. And, again, it's
not hard to see. The rumors in the
rest of the world are brazen about that
openly.
So here's what Michael Tracy said,
highlighting how Howard Lutnick. He's saying US poll
political coalitions are always kept compromised by factions
with contradictory interest in pursuit of power. But
Trump's standing on stage with Muslims, that's what
he's pointing out, who Muslim imams who opposed
Israel.
And then and, again, the I think this
is different than the one they were referencing.
Either way, the point is he's clearly trying
to give the impression that he because because
as politicians do, you want the votes, or
you at least want the perception of those
votes.
But his point is leaning into that and
then holding this rapid pro Israel rally the
next day with the people actually in charge
takes the cake.
These people that are literally standing up and
claiming that these people who oppose Israel
are terrorists because they oppose Israel. That's what
Israel would say. So here's Howard Lutnick, head
of the Trump transition team, screaming that we
must elect Trump because we must crush Jihad
in, like, the most I mean, as he
says, is this the same rally where everyone
claims to despise Bush and Cheney?
These these guys, we're back in square 1.
You have been pulled right back around.
So
the first thing,
we must elect
Donald
j Trump president
because
we must
crush
jihad.
I mean, I mean, honestly, what's even with
the screening and the it's it they're treating
you like you're at some kind of a
concert. It's not about facts or substance. It's
about trying to emotionally manipulate you.
Crush jihad? I mean, what is that? You
wanna explain what that even means? I mean,
you have to realize that we're not talking
about some movement. They're talking about a broad
concept. That is war on terror.
I can't believe we're falling for this again.
So here is Rudy Giuliani.
Patrick Henningston, who you should follow as well,
says this is completely over the top, unhinged,
and frankly unnecessary. A bit embarrassing too. I
agree. But it really shows you just how
powerful the Israeli lobby and their propaganda machine
are in the United States.
September 11 was our darkest hour. October 7
was Israel's darkest hour.
So, Ian, why is this being discussed at
a rally for Trump's election?
Good question.
They are our best friend.
I worked for Ronald Reagan for 8 years.
Ronald Reagan said
That you couldn't trust them, by the way,
but verify. We have to be there for
Israel always
because they are always there for us.
As somebody says in the tweet next,
where exactly?
Right? You wanna you wanna point that out,
Rudy? Are you talking about you and your
elitist friends that are pro Israel? Are you
talking about Americans?
You wanna demonstrate how Israel supported Americans literally
anywhere?
Floods and hurricanes. I mean, in a sense
of, like, helping people. They were they there?
No? Okay. Were they there? What about the
wars? Okay. No. You're letting US fight this
war. Okay. You you wanna show me anywhere
that they're acting in the interest of anything
the US has gone through that is something
that when anything goes wrong, the US jumps
to the aid? Where where is that demonstration
over here? Where has Israel helped Americans?
I'd love to hear that answer. I'm sure
somebody would cobble something together, but you have
to realize how
shockingly the opposite. Whether it's the US's liberty
or even, let's be real, 911.
I know there are people out there that
still wanna hide from these facts, like the
ISIS Al Qaeda overlap being literally created and
coached or and cultivated by the US, Israel,
Saudi Arabia. This is what we can prove
today.
Prove without question, without even that is not
up for debate.
We have to realize this, the the overarching
reality that is so clear. And you're going
back to the idea of who this guy
represents
and what he supports.
These people are here screaming that you need
to support a foreign government that is actively
subverting your
country.
I worked for Ronald Reagan for
are always there for us.
Or, by the way, another 45 examples we
could list off where they have actually acted
against American interests and brazenly so.
But these people are also doing that,
and they're being paid for it. And that's
why they want you to believe that it's
a good thing.
Hamas is not there for us.
Iran is not there for us. They wanna
kill us.
No. They really don't. They definitely have a
problem with the US government. But if you
listen to them in any, I mean, any
conversation I mean, here's what's interesting. The government
even is explicitly clear it's about the government
of US and Israel. But if you actually
look at anything, and I mean anything that
covers the Iranian people, it is very weirdly
pro American.
I don't mean in the sense of, like,
fighting for a better life in America, this
lie they tell you about on the flip.
No. Just the idea that American people,
largely, like myself and the rest, are aware
of these illusions and they very clearly like,
I there's a guy I interviewed in the
past who did amazing work. He used to
go around and kind of tour these places.
And at the peak, the height of the
paranoia being pushed by Israel from Iran, he
goes and travels through there and shows that
this place are amazing and they're so welcoming
and come have dinner with my family. And
Let me I want a perfect way to
pause it. Look at this maniac.
These are people that are trying to ramp
you up to think that these people want
to kill your family because they want to
destroy them for Israel.
I don't know why we can't we've been
how long
these kind of people have been guiding, driving,
forcing this country against its own interests.
And the Palestinians
are taught to kill us at 2 years
old.
They won't let a Palestinian in Jordan. They
won't let a Palestinian in Egypt. God, it's
just such a disgusting lie
across the board.
They won't let a Palestinian in? Are you
actually saying that? He realized there are Palestinians
in all of these places. He's simply trying
to make it sound like that because what's
happening is the idea, whether or not they
support the Palestinians,
They refuse to allow them, Israel, to force
these populations into their countries for obvious reasons
that have nothing to do whether or not
they like Palestinians.
This guy is a rabid Zionist maniac who
is pushing you to hurt your country for
another country.
And and and, really, multiple peoples around the
world trying to make trying to make you
hate them.
Hate them for false reasons.
This is just like with Bush and I
mean, everything. The the the turning into they
all wanna hate you for your freedom.
Are we still pretending like that ever made
sense?
And Harris wants to bring them to you.
That's that's all they they that's all they
have. They wanna desperately drive you into the
position where you think that she's gonna force
the the immigration and the well, guess what?
Guys, this same dynamic been going on as
far back as you can look through Trump's
administration before and after.
It's just about how they cover what's going
on. All of it being driven by belligerent
foreign policy of the United States.
Where do you think these people are coming
from, these Palestinians? Do you think they just
magically popped up and wanna steal your steal
your front yard?
We can't be this stupid. I think most
people can see through this.
They may have good people.
I'm sorry. I don't take a risk with
people that are taught to kill Americans at
2.
I That's that's completely out of nowhere.
Now what's funny about that, sickeningly enough, is
that you can prove that that happens in
Israel.
Now look, I can I can guarantee you
there's hatred at an early age for a
lot of reasons? You know, especially when you
watch your family get blown up in front
of you. God forbid.
But either way, there is not some structured
idea that they're teaching them to hate
Americans. Like, at best, you're talking about Israelis,
and you could put you could argue that
in a sense of a Jewish person a
100%.
That exists all over the world in the
context of people that irrationally hate.
This isn't even irrational in the context of
focusing on Israeli Zionist conversation. But, of course,
because the Israeli conversation conflates those two things,
is it really that hard to see why
they would think the same in some cases?
But either way, to argue that they hate
Americans?
It's just it's completely hollow.
Do you realize there are American Palestinians that
live in these areas, in Gaza?
So if we're to believe that they're trained
to hate Americans, why is there over 6
100 Palestinian Americans that were trapped in Gaza
when this started? You wanna explain that, Rudy?
I don't think they care to explain it
because they're lazy with their arguments.
Try to find that real quick.
Let's do
there it is.
Just to show you. I'll play this clip
first, but I want you to see that,
you know so 600 Palestinian Americans were trapped
according to NPR in Gaza after October 7th.
I don't know how you reconcile those two
points.
I'm on the side of Israel.
You're on the side of Israel.
Donald Trump's on the side of Israel. Pretty
hollow cheer, guys. I think even they're getting
tired of this because it doesn't make sense.
And they're on the side of the terrorists.
God. Do you think is this is this
is cartoonish?
As Patrick said, this is embarrassing.
The side of the terror we're going right
back to war on terror level, which by
the way didn't even really fit that all
the way that reason that got to the
momentum is because it was right after 911.
Even then though, you can show that most
people were uncomfortable with the giant push and
the broad stroke of just people in this
area.
So here
Oh, wait. I knew that. See, I don't
know. I don't even wanna explain it. Something
so weird about that, happens every time.
There it is. I click it and it
just doesn't go up, it's weird. Okay so
Oh woah.
It's the wrong one.
An overdue reunion became a nightmare between this
trapped family. So it same point really, but
there's a larger article. This is an American
family trapped in Gaza. It's October 12th 23rd
23. So why weren't they murdered, Giuliani?
The point is that's not true.
Let's see, let's do this.
This should pop up. I'll include both of
them for you. I imagine that pops up.
Oh, yeah. See, there's plenty of articles covering
it.
This is
600 Americans are estimated to be trapped in
Gaza including a Massachusetts family.
Funny how that works out. Funny how the
facts are easy to show. People just wanna
lie about it.
Megatron makes a good point here. He says,
breaking.
Call for killing 2 year olds in Palestine
for allegedly posing a future risk to Israel
Trump rally. Not exactly what happened, but realize
the implication there. So if you're saying they're
trained to kill Americans at 2 years old,
well, there's no way to not see that
that then opens the door for why they
should, know, maybe they we won't aim for
them, but they get killed. Well, they're terrorists
anyway. That's what the Israelis are openly saying.
This guy is absolutely
dangerous.
Like I said before, morally ambiguous, deranged.
Now don't forget, here's what rule of jul
Rudy Giuliani
said about starving Iranians for the interest of
Israel.
What, 5 years ago? So now tell me
that you're not a serious threat. Speaking to
the MEK by the way, who was a
terrorist on the US terrorist watch list until
Clinton took them off and they are still
very much a a deranged cultish mentality
that just be it's just like the modern
rebels. They are the absolute embodiment of everything
they pretend they're fighting but they're willing to
go along with US interest for money or
whatever else, so we just pretend that's not
the case.
It's the regime we're trying to overthrow sees
us as a threat. And he's paid the
fee. It's more a threat. It is a
reality. The protests are getting worse. I don't
know when we're going to overthrow them. It
could be in a few days, months, a
couple of years, but it's gonna happen. They
are going to be overthrown.
The people of Iran obviously have now had
enough.
The sanctions are working.
The currency is
going to nothing. Yeah. That that's not hard
to recognize. So their sanctions destroyed the currency.
So not Iran's fault. Got it.
They're where Russia was. They're where Poland was.
We see signs of young men and women
saying, give me some food.
We saw a sign of a man trying
to sell his internal organs for 500 American
dollars,
probably a fortune in Iran today.
This is truly pitiful.
These are the kinds of conditions
that lead to successful revolution.
Successful revolution. Right? So starving people deliberately, so
they have to sell their organs for food,
is how we do this.
Yeah. He didn't expect that to become publicized.
There's no way around it. Just like Mike
Pompeo saying that if you don't do what
we say, your children will starve. I mean,
they they there is more than enough. Just
like with Israel, by the way, if you
really care,
the evidence is across the board of what
these people really are, left and right. But
Eric Michael also says shocked that the supposed
Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden would turn
out to be a rabidly pro Israel rally.
Now, obviously, the point is it's not a
Nazi rally. It's ridiculous. But the point is
that clearly, if you're rabidly pro Israel
and they are the obvious and very
dynamic going on in the world and even
you can prove that Zionism was literally working
with Nazism during the final solution, even according
to Wikipedia, it's kind of hard to not
make the like, my point though is that
what they're trying to make out to be
is actually a deviation from what the truth
is, to hide Israel's clear influence here. That's
the I think that's obvious.
So then when you come out and go
well, just simply it like, then if so
if you wanna make it out to be
Nazi,
pro Nazi in the concept that you're supporting
the Israeli genocide and what they're doing is
right out of the same conversation, well, you'll
get just you'll get, oh, you're a lefty.
You would listen to that fake news. Well,
that's not what I'm talking about, but you
see how easy it is to deviate? Give
them an excuse to ignore the facts?
Boy, Brad Miller, points out something that I'm
actually blown away,
specifically
the or constitutional why did conservatives did not
scream about? Because you realize there's already a
precedent set. There is a supreme court precedent
about the idea of burning the US flag.
Whatever your thoughts on it,
it is something that has been deemed constitutionally
protected.
But, But again, let's be pretending like the
guy telling you that you should arrest someone
for that is somehow the one fighting for
the constitution.
And as long as the speaker of the
house of representatives
is here, I would like to put forward
a bill because
I watched
2 months ago as some very bad people,
radical left people, but
Okay. So, again, bad people. We're talking about
Americans that on the left who supported
the Palestinian
resistance
and do and through so, burned the American
flag. Now you can read into that whatever
you want. All of it's constitutionally protected. Whether
they want communism, whether they want I mean,
it doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter in the context of whether
or not it's protected. It is protected under
free speech. So if you don't believe that,
then you want limited speech. Own it.
But what he's doing is telling you that.
They're very bad people, so just recognize this
game of unity and the idea. They're act
attacking
Americans, acting within their rights.
Now who would that be for exactly?
I'm sure you can connect the dots.
By the way, nothing happened to them. In
Washington, DC burned our American flags. They were
burning flag.
And I would like to suggest that we
put in
a bill
if you burn the American flag 1 year
in jail. Wow.
Everybody cheering against their own rights.
Now just like with free speech, if you
don't understand why you have to protect that,
then you don't understand your rights.
Free speech, you protect if you don't protect
the worst of speech, then you don't believe
in free speech. That's the whole point.
When you start carving out loopholes,
governments take control. I mean, we're already there,
guys.
It kills me. Now as Brad Miller, I
highly respect, he said and again, here's Bennie
Johnson.
1 year in jail. Fire.
That's just sad. And now, again, these people
aren't dumb. I guarantee you they understand that
that's violation of they don't care because it's
pro Republican narrative agenda, Trump election, Team Smart
Politics. Brad says, why aren't more people alarmed
to this statement? It's not even the first
time he's made this remark.
Because they agree with it. That's it. Now
it says Trump's comments show that he wants
to censor certain types of free speech and
cancel,
those who engage in it.
This is dangerous ground.
And again, here's where the this is the
kind of argument you get.
Emotional.
Now this is a random guy on Twitter,
but he says, you burn the flag, you
should you show your true feelings about this
country. You hate it. That's your interpretation.
You could argue those people are fighting for
the country, and they recognize that that has
been used against them. That's not what I'm
saying I believe in.
I have a certain reverence for certain things,
but I also recognize that that is something
that has been used against us.
You realize that is being flown while they
commit genocide. That flag is being flown while
they occupy foreign countries under your name.
Now that doesn't mean that the flag as
it originated is necessarily bad, but you have
to realize that that does change the interpretation
of it today, and we can fight to
change that back.
I wouldn't I wouldn't burn an American flag
because I just don't believe with the mixed
conversation there about what it could be. But
I also recognize and again, to be quite
honest, if you bring it back to my
true understand my belief about that none of
these things should ultimately exist. Right? That that's
important to understand. But
you don't get to dictate real Don Pelayo
what they do and how they feel about
those things because it is their right.
Now just because you don't like it, somebody
could make the same argument for why you
shouldn't have to you're not allowed to wear
a red hat. That means nazi. Didn't they
already do that?
Oh, you'd be outraged. You're suppressing my rights.
But, of course, you're completely unwilling to over
to look at how those are the same
thing.
But it goes, you never see a lover
of freedom and liberty burning our flag. These
are just childish arguments.
It is the leftist Marxist Islamist and there
you go. You've fallen right into it. Now
these are people I can prove to you
in many cases who are simply fighting for
Palestinian rights and recognize the imperialism of the
United States.
I'm not those are I could I could
show you some that aren't even on the
left.
But who cares? Because it's not gonna connect
with them because they don't want to hear
it. And they'll just go, there's probably a
secret lefty then. It's just blind assumption and
wishful thinking.
Brad says, not the point. You're reacting emotionally,
which is the problem. We're talking about free
speech and the law. Go cry elsewhere.
And he goes, projecting again? I mean, these
people I'd say you you're literally highlighting what
you're doing
while trying to you're projecting onto Brad. That's
what's funny. You're you're I am.
It kills me, guys. It does. And I
I again, you have to also consider that
half of this conversation is not even real.
That it's being, you know, Israeli bots and
whatever else.
Now here's Stefanik who's just one of the
worst people.
Just so from from the beginning of those,
like, fake antisemitism hearings where I think they
wanted it to be another red scare kind
of dynamic where they just didn't get it
going because they were lying about everything. And
even the police in the middle of it
said you're wrong. It didn't happen. And she
was, like, her hands were shaking. She was,
like, so I mean, she was emotionally driven,
but I think by something bigger than just
political interests.
But as Michael Tracey says, it appears a
key theme of this allegedly Nazi rally at
Madison Square Garden is that Kamala has turned
her back on Israel. You don't realize how
alarming it is that this is the central
point of a rally for this upcoming election?
Just it's it's crazy. Stand with Israel. They're
screaming.
And then
take a look
around the world what is happening.
You had the catastrophic
wall withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Kamala Harris was the last person in the
room advising Joe Biden of that horrific mistake.
You had Putin invading Isn't it isn't it
such a ridiculous killer that they're gonna say
removing ourselves from Afghanistan was the mistake as
opposed to the objective of deliberately leaving all
of that which both sides your government were
okay with for a larger agenda that I
clearly see playing out or the simple idea
that it was an ongoing 20 plus year
catastrophe of an illegal occupation.
Right? I mean, it doesn't I mean, I'm
not praising any side of it. I think
we're still being played there. I think we
still have people there. But either way, it's
just funny that ending an illegal occupation can
be framed as a bad thing, however it
goes. But again, I'd be clear, I don't
think that's what they were trying to accomplish.
But that's the framing
to lying from within their narrative like in
the COVID era. But think about that for
a second. They want you to be outraged
that they stopped an illegal war, which which
again, they didn't do. Just be clear. Ukraine
and then just over 1 year ago,
we had our most precious ally Israel
under attack from our Precious ally. Iranian backed
Hamas terrorists. Nope. And Incorrect. In fact, they're
funded by Israel. But since we already went
to that point earlier,
I'll skip it. But it is it's incredible
to me that people still pretend like this
is not the most obvious thing in the
world there. So are you saying Benjamin Netanyahu
deliberately boosted Hamas to try to prevent a
Palestinian state? Yeah. Sure. He deliberately and systematically
even even told this on record, whoever wants
to avoid
the threat
of a 2 state solution
has to support my policy of paying protection
money to the Hamas. So what we did,
with the permission
of our prime minister is
to let
Qatar
to transfer
a huge amount of money in cash,
probably more than
$1,400,000,000.
By doing it, we increase the power of
Hamas.
We
did everything in order to make
Wrong one. Well, let's see this quickly.
So bottom line is, as I said before,
1,000,000,000 of dollars in suitcases,
and they still pretend that's to buy aid.
Think about that. The only way aid came
in was from international agencies. Why? Because there's
no aid to go around. So they're lying
to you. Simple. It's so transparent. They were
funding, as we showed you the tweet from
before, as Netanyahu is quoted in saying, to
divide the Palestinian people.
By funding the pre the group that is
now and even Horetz wrote this stuff on
October, like, right after this, That he funded
this group and that's why it blew up
in their face. They've written about this. And
again, this is in 2020. They funded them
right up until this. Now in no way
is that to undermine the act of resistance
like some people think I'm trying to do.
My point is that I don't know why
we can't factor this in. We have to
realize that they could've funded them and they
could've lost control of it and they now
are fighting for resistance or there's been both
side. Both I think both things are possible.
I think we're dealing with a situation where
they have been funding this group forever, but
because of ongoing atrocities, the fight didn't get
what they wanted. Over time, the group has
changed. That's why the charter changed. That's why
every different younger generations grew up and became
willing to fight for resistance against Israel. The
bottom line is you can still argue that
there might be influence at some level,
obviously.
I'm not saying I know for sure all
of this, but I know that you can
clearly point out that they have been openly
funding them. Now well, now it's open.
So how can you box that out? The
active resistance, whether it was done by this
or not, is still a legal active arm
resistance. That's a fact.
But this is 2020,
Mossad chief urging them to continue funding them.
Right? So it's pretty pathetic that someone like
Stefanik would make these arguments.
And steak. You had Putin invading Ukraine, and
then just over 1 year ago,
we had our most precious ally Israel
under attack from Iranian backed Hamas terrorists,
and Kamala Harris has turned her back on
Israel.
I think about how dumb that is. I
mean, right now, the entire point is that
as Jimmy just pointed out, she's the one
clearly committing genocide so we can lean in
with Trump because he might not. But here
in that rally from Trump, they're telling you
she's the one that won't support Israel. We're
gonna keep doing that.
You don't think he sees that? You don't
think other people do? It's I don't know
why people can't allow themselves to digest this
real conversation, why so many people act like
it's the adult thing to do to fall
in line.
I just don't get it.
And
what did we see?
What did we see on our college campuses?
We saw a skyrocketing
of antisemitism.
You realize she's still pushing that. She was
the one spearheading the illusion of that whole
thing. It's been proven by even Israeli media
that they've been lying about these things, even
corporate media.
Even in front of her, one of the
police officers was like, that didn't happen. We
investigated. That wasn't true. And you know what?
She still says that today.
There's no way to misunderstand that.
She got told and proved it in front
of her by the police officer that investigated
it that it wasn't real, then marching through
that school hallway saying kill all the Jews
or whatever she claimed. He's like, that didn't
happen.
Then a week later, she says it in
an interview. Oh, okay. So you weren't trying
to find the truth. You were projecting propaganda
from somebody.
Oh, don't forget. She's funded by APAC, in
case that matters.
Let me ask you all. Did you see
that committee hearing with those college presidents, now
former
college presidents?
It's just so sad. These are people that
I don't support because of their clear agenda
to inform children in a way that makes
me uncomfortable, at least in some of their
cases. I can't speak to all of them.
But, nonetheless,
what they said was that there's context.
There is.
Not for these brazen, rabid Zionists that really
want you to think that no matter what,
if you say Israel with a weird face,
you're a racist. Right? Doesn't matter. The point
is that people were saying things like Palestine,
river to the sea. And you guys made
it out to be rapid antisemitism, and they
simply said, well, that's not true in every
case. And you flipped out. Just like we
saw Josh Hawley saying, you can't condemn you
can't condemn it to follow. Well, that's it
means resistance.
And you know that. You liar. You dishonest
person. You absolute mindless anti American per what
they're doing is fighting against American interests because
they're trying to censor your speech.
And you guys wanna point to Kamala that
she's doing it too. But how do you
not see the reality here? These are some
of the most obvious like, that's the problem
for me in this conversation. There's far, far
more right on the surface examples of how
they want to remove your speech in real
time. Now, yes, we've got out the Clintons
and other parts of this that are speaking
up about removing the first amendment, but I'm
not seeing that come from the administration. Now
to be clear, I agree that's the case.
I agree. From either side, they want to
do that.
But think about how crazy it is that
we've got them standing up and screaming, we
want to remove your right for this. Well,
they're not saying it exactly like that, but
that's what this
is. Where are they saying that on the
left? Show me that. I mean, the the
administration of Kamala.
Now if you if you find an example,
Woods Bryant
I
agree, but I find it clear that it's
very slanted.
But they just agree with this censorship just
like we've seen this in congress that's the
woke riot. If you're on the conservative side,
don't fall for it. They're lying to you.
That's right.
I asked the presidents
of Penn, MIT, and Harvard,
does calling for the genocide of Jews Which
is not what they did. That's the lazy
overlap.
When they said river to the sea means
calling for the genocide of Jews. Despite that
very statement being in the Likud charter for
Netanyahu's lit political party. But, of course, when
they say it, it's okay because you are
on that side. You're a hypocrite.
You're feeling simply,
in all of these contexts, that you want
these people to be free from their oppression.
Now, yes, I guarantee at some level somebody
wants that to be the case, but that's
not what it means inherently.
And at the end of the day, all
of these examples, the Palestinian flag by her
has been called a symbol of terror.
You can't take these people seriously. Your university's
code of conduct.
And one after the other said, it depends
on the context and the Because that's I
mean, think how crazy it is that you're
talking about the lefties as if they wanna
remove free speech when what you just described
is them actually
engaging with free speech.
Not the one screaming about how we'll protect
it though. The one screaming about how we'll
protect your free speech is outlining why they'll
take it away.
It's just this is wild. World heard.
You're fired.
5 have been fired. So many to go.
I wonder why.
Because Israel's influence on all these things is
overwhelming.
But they've lost the influence over the average
people though, which is really what matters.
And, you know,
compare that
with president Trump.
He brought us the most secure border in
our nation's history.
He brought us the strongest economy.
Despite the swinging open fences of Texas that
we don't wanna point at, one that doesn't
work for us though. Right? Or the reality
that we're all being deceived by playing this
game, how they're literally manufacturing these things to
justify their agendas, and Israel's playing a central
role in the weaponization of immigration. But who
cares? We won't talk about it, when we
don't want you to see it. He proudly
supports our law enforcement,
and he has and always will
stand with Israel.
Hey. Hey. And it was me.
Sonny, you're gonna end on the note of
supporting a foreign country while you're pro while
you're there to get them to participate in
a an election here?
Doesn't that scare anybody?
Sure as hell scares me even though I
see through the whole I mean, the idea
of the election in general. It still worries
me how on the surface this is, and
we're not pointing it out. Here's RFK Junior.
Michael also says, I've never seen such a
luke ludicrous propaganda.
He says, there's not a single skin scintilla
of evidence that Trump would end the warfare
state. There's a massive body of evidence that
Trump would expand the warfare state, including that
he boasts of doing exactly that during his
first term.
But they'd love to paint you this picture
of what they want you to think he
is with no evidence though.
You know, the same guy that Orfka Junior
told you was going to ruin the country
before he weighed in with him.
Don't you think
that we deserve a president in this country
who's gonna restore the moral authority of the
United States of America?
Oh, you think that we deserve a president
who's gonna end the So you mean, like,
assassinating a leader under the guise of diplomacy?
Like, that kind of rep preparing the moral
authority?
It just it was just so hollow.
Yeah. I hope so. I sure hope so.
But that will be based on a blind
hope
despite his history. Warfare
state and rebuild the middle class state
and end the warfare state
and rebuild the middle class.
Oh, you want a president who's gonna put
America first?
Haven't seen that yet. Don't you want a
president
who's gonna protect our children?
You know, think about this. He just said
put America first. Well, he's actively actively, like
all of them, acting for a foreign government's
interest at your expense in every dynamic, or
that he just said keep our children safe
while he's still promoting a shot for them
that is deadly.
It's just it's almost like these arguments are
getting tired.
I mean, who needs to hear them will
ignore them. And those I mean, I shouldn't
say. I'm not trying to give up. But
I just think it's frustrating that how long
we have to go on with this charade.
And who's gonna protect women's sports?
And who's gonna stop defining this country around
long racial lines.
Now I gave him the trans point, 100%.
But, you know, my point is whether or
not they these are all statements, and we'll
have to wait and see if they actually
follow through. That's just politics for you. Whether
or not you think they're trying to deceive
you, it's rare that these things actually look
at his first promises. But did you really
just say that?
Did you really just that he's gonna remove
that? He is actively driving that against Palestinians.
You just heard 7 people before you.
I mean, Stefanik just actively conflated Palestinians at
large with any but here he is. We're
gonna remove those things. I mean, this is
fantasy land, guys.
Now, again, maybe it'll happen. And I would
love to say that's the case and I
was wrong. But everything on the table points
otherwise,
other than saying these things.
Don't use it.
Let me include that for you real quick.
Okay. Moving on to the next point.
Truth seeker
showed us this. And again, I just this
is my point about peak adiocracy.
Now they already brought Hogan out once, Hulk
Hogan.
But it's just and even then, it just
felt ridiculous.
And the way the music it's like we're
watching the WWF.
But again, guys, I kinda think that's the
point. They're aiming at the lowest common denominator.
This is how
low they think you are. I don't have
a much higher opinion of the American population.
I'd like to think you do too.
Even the song, you know, everything about it.
It's it's almost like they're making fun of
you. For the rights of airmen.
Or at the movie. I'm a real
American.
Fight for what's right.
Fight for your
I mean, I just just to be honest,
this is not about Trump.
This is kinda sad, right? This is cringey.
It is
low bottom barrel, childish.
You know, we're not now we're we're pa
we're at the point where we're past any
kind of substance. Right? It's all about flash
and show and demonstration and and narrative.
Right? And the point is, why not? Seems
like most everybody in the conversation is like,
yeah, we're gonna vote for them anyway, just
like the left is doing.
As Quentin Tarantino said, I don't care what
she does. I'm vote for anyway. That's where
we are in this conversation, and that's supposed
to be the pinnacle of elections. Right? The
pinnacle of political violence.
It's pretty sad.
Oh, here we're doing the same thing again.
Oh, yeah.
Tearing the shirt off because that's cool.
Yeah.
Am I am I wrong, guys? Am I
wrong? Am I am I wrong? Guys, am
I wrong? Am I am I I mean,
I'm not trying to be belittling and diminishing.
This just feels ridiculous.
Like like like almost like another country making
fun of what our process is.
That's just it's crazy to me.
Now, here is what Derek Mortar posted.
Right?
What's his name now? Camacho Slice or whatever
it was, the guy from Idiocracy.
It's kinda hard that to see the weird
overlap there.
Now, of course, here's the vigilant fox saying,
unforgettable scenes
unfold at the historic rally, which seems to
be, like, everyone now. Like, it's not, like,
breathless reporting about how this changed the world
after everything they do no matter what. That's
that's politics for you. But if you read
through this,
you're gonna look at per half the same
things we already showed you. And
apparently it's a good thing if you look
at it from a different angle. Right?
But as Sal Diagris points out, which I
love,
it's it's that meme with Joe Rogan and
the and the, you know, UFC report pod
or, commentators
where they're like that famous one where they're
like, oh my god. Leaning back. Right? If
you don't know the meme or look it
up, he writes, politician
does nothing for years.
Politician during reelection. I'm gonna do stuff. They're
followers.
It's just so perfect.
This is what Derek was just saying. Like,
he mentioned some meaningless statement about the Fed.
People lose their minds. You know? It's just
it's all it's just the same thing every
single time
over and over.
Now here's JD Vance,
Michael Tracey as well. Now, again, he's very
clearly on the left in this conversation, but
I think he's highlighting things that are worthy
no matter what side you're on to point
out. Even if you think he's doing it
to support come all, which I I mean,
maybe. But it doesn't I I the point
is for me, whether or not it's in
each something else, they're facts, and you should
care about those things. You should engage with
them and recognize that both of them are
actively driving you in the same position. But
he says, JD Vance touts Trump arming Ukraine
in his first term. As a reminder, Trump
and Vance have never opposed you arming Ukraine.
In fact, they both continue to brag about
it. That's my point. Just because he says,
it'll be over or it never would have
happened.
If you actually look at their policy and
what they truly stand by, they will continue
the same thing. Why? Because it's your government.
They do their that's what the government wants.
They're gonna continue the operation. That's the point.
And he goes, this is JD Vance, heralding
the fruits of a successful lobbying campaign by
Lindsey Graham and John McCain. Remember that clip
we play where they simply
standing there helping the like, we're we're gonna
help you fight against Russia. It's a weird
creepy video where Lindsey Graham is, like, rubbing
his hands together like a villain. Remember
that?
Thought it would be quicker.
Thought it was right there.
I admire the fact that you will fight
for your homeland.
Your fight is our fight.
2017
will be the year of offense.
Pretending like this was some organic thing because
Russia bad guy. Right? Totally weren't funding and
driving them to go against them the entire
time. Right?
Transparent.
Lazy for not to pretend otherwise is simply
willful ignorance.
But the point is who's he's 6 praising
their efforts
to persuade Trump to arm Ukraine. But nowadays,
we're endlessly assured that the neocons have flushed
out the Trump led GOP.
Here's RFK Junior. Same point. Michael's pointed this
out. He says, as usual, RFK is spewing
absolute BS. Trump's 2016 transition operation
also we'll read this first, I guess, makes
more sense. He's He's simply saying that he's
he's saying that Donald Trump is breaking tradition
by privately funding his transition team and has
already started it 3 months early. As usual,
in many cases, they just point to something
that's not nor not crazy or new, and
they just make it out to be because
it's politics and people buy it, and their
partisan people spread the same narrative. He's simply
saying as usual, RFK lying about it. He
says Trump's 2016 transition operation
also started fundraising from private donors months in
advance of the election. Read the financial disclosure
which link is for you right there, compiled
by not the deep state but by Trump's
operation chief financial officer. His joke there is
that of course when it's something you don't
like they just pretend, oh, deep state. Liar.
You know, whatever. He says, there is nothing
remotely unprecedented about Trump soliciting private contributions to
fund his transition team in advance. He literally
did the same thing last time. One of
those early 2016 transition donors, Linda McMahon, is
now running the 2024 transition.
He says, presumably, if the current Trump transition
operation was so revolutionary,
there would be no need to brazenly lie
about it. As usual, but he also points
out that Linda McMahon,
one of the first donors to the 2016
transition,
is now running the for this this transition.
Lobbyists
donated out the wazoo.
The donors to the 2024 operation have not
been disclosed.
But if RFK is already lying about the
most basic details, why take his word for
it? Now, if they haven't been disclosed, how
do we know to tell the truth? There
won't be any lobbyists. Well, my point stands
from before. Why why care about the lobbyists
when you've already packed it full of your
pharma defense contract defense leaders, which is what
Howard said on the record.
Because that's what the lobbyists would fight for.
Or maybe they are there, we're just not
being shown.
But it doesn't matter because you already blindly
trust it, which applies both ways.
Now on the on the other side of
this, realize that there's sim similar things happening.
This is interesting. Here's Alternette. Here's a lifelong
conservative saying I'm voting for Kamala even though
it makes my skin crawl. I just wanna
point out how all of that's stupid.
This idea that you think that just, like,
voting for the lesser of evil, whether you're
going vote to Kamala or towards Trump, is
that somehow gonna bet it's ridiculous?
You need to recognize how you are the
one being played if you're falling into that
line.
Now Elon Musk points this out. I've seen
this circulating.
This is the top donor contributions to Donald
Trump, which are completely disconnected from reality,
omitting all of the obvious ones for real
clear reasons. But it simply says, you know,
showing you, look, Google and Microsoft are funding
and, you know, trying to make it look
like he's the small guy. Even though FedEx,
Wells Fargo, Johnson and Johnson, Southwest Airlines, Northrop
Grumman, Raytheon. These are all supporters of Trump.
Right? It's funny to show you and by
the way, you see overlap, which shows you
the whole point as usual that it's really
just about funding both sides. It's not really
it's an illusion.
But he says Google and Microsoft control almost
a 100% of the web search market. Fair
point. I agree. But when you stand back
and realize that it's your government as opposed
to a left and right, or search to
reign the right or the left. And if
you actually look at the bigger picture, that's
never been the case. It's always about controlling
the current direction, the current narrative, and it
oscillates back and forth.
But either way,
this is not even accurate. Because we can
clearly show you. I mean, look at this
list, and what they're saying is top donors.
Okay?
Top for him is apparently, Trump's top donor
they want you to believe is a $134,000.
Come on. You can't be this stupid.
Google I mean, just Miriam Adelson alone has
given him almost a $100,000,000.
And more is expected.
Google over here for her is 1,400,000.
I that's not even the full picture for
her either.
Ain't that stupid? And what's the point of
sharing this information?
Here is Forbes.
Here are Trump's top billionaire donors. I mean,
Derrick Rose broke it down for you pretty
well. But the point is you can or,
you know, better than this I would argue.
But he goes they go through and show
you some of these lists.
Right? I mean, look, just at the top
of the list is $76,000,000.
Timothy Mellon, which we mentioned in the other
article. Well, okay. Elon or rabbit hole, where's
that?
It doesn't say specific types of contributors. It
says donors.
Okay.
Again, top billionaire donors. I'm just simply pointing
out it's just dishonest across the board. And
maybe they don't all know that. I guarantee
you Elon knows that. You know why? Because
Elon's on that list. And it's more than
a $134,000,000,
a $144,000.
But either way, you can look through all
these,
and it's a lot of them. All these
are billionaires. Every one of them are very
high level in elitist billionaires
funding Donald Trump. But here's Kamala Harris. Forbes
Daily, the billionaires behind Kamala Harris, pre presidential
run. And it's the same exact point.
Going a different direction. But you can go
through them all. There's a whole bunch. It's
just same conversation. You have billionaire elitist who
are
interested in and I argue that they go
both ways, like usual.
My point though is to show you that
what they're sharing is a simple lie.
Now I'm actually gonna skip this for time.
The point here is that Brad Miller is
just simply saying, you know, it's plain as
day that Trump has been selected. Which is
exactly what I think. Certainly could be wrong,
but I think the obvious evidence suggests that
this is just another s- a long line
in people that are being put in front
of you. That we can show, and going
back to the Clinton Trump administration, same point,
or rather,
election
where WikiLeaks itself revealed that Clinton had an
email where she said, we have to make
sure that Trump's on the final stage. Paraphrasing.
Now, they love to pretend that means that
she thought she would win, but I think
we know better today, don't we? And the
reality being that Trump was the point. Because
it pacified people during COVID 19. The most
resistant would have been the conservative
constitutionalists, and they were the most pacified because
Trump and largely still are. I think the
same thing is happening again. But the point
in this conversation you should read is just
the way that people respond. So we should
choose Marxism then? You know, just let's just
nope. Didn't say that, which is what he's
saying. Nope. I never suggested that. Like, but
people can't get past this. And it's a
good kind of long back and forth for
you to read to understand how this works.
Because Brad does a great job. But here's
Tucker Carlson,
endorsing a political candidate like a journalist is
not supposed to do, which you can do
what you want, but realize that that is
the same point we're trying to make.
I'll I'll read David Icke's words. He says,
genuinely alternative
journalists
don't promote political candidates of whatever color. They
expose now, of course, the game is that
it's just that important today because the world's
gonna end. Well, you know, they've said that
every single time. But it says they expose
the untruths and hidden agendas and let people
make their own conclusions
who to vote for.
Yeah. Like, you know, come to your own
conclusions. You've heard that before. Right? And it
says Carlson says that Trump has
liberated us from the obligation to tell lies.
Think about that statement.
I guess that implies that you felt obligated
to lie this whole time or at least
in some cases, which is my point with
Fox or whatever else, and I still argue
that there's no real evidence that he has
broken away truly from the m corporate machine.
But he was still under contract while he
started his new thing, and nobody seemed to
care about that. But who cares, y'know, I
must be the crazy one. But my point,
is that
you're obligated to lie. I mean, that was
simply I I was never obligated to lie.
Either way, it says nonsense. And this is
the main point. There are, David Icke points
out, you don't need anyone else to liberate
you to tell the truth. You just do
it. It's a choice, and it always has
been. He's right in what he says about
the system, but what he misses is that
his heroes are part of the system,
telling their target audience what they want to
hear while heading in the same direction by
a different route to the same end as
the opponents they condemn.
I frankly think it's very easy to see
that Tucker is absolutely aware of that. But
please decide for yourself.
And, again, endorsing jur endorsing a political candidate,
it it you're that means you're an activist,
guys. You are now part of this game.
A journalist would try to inform you and
let you come to your own conclusions.
Right? Now look, I'm actively gonna point out
the faults of either side.
But I'm not gonna say you should vote
for 1 or the other. You'll never hear
me say that even if one distant point
in the future, hopefully because things change,
that I might decide to vote for somebody.
I would never
conflate my work with that.
What? I watch.
It's I've my I hope my my decade
plus of this work thus far, staying consistent
with my principles has proven that to you.
Right? Nokas Draven says and this is the
point I was making earlier.
He says, Israel.
All they talk about is Israel. And this
is the the rally. He says, damn, man.
I can't understand how none of these people
can see it.
And this is a combat veteran or conservative.
And he says, I mean even if you
do support Trump, is there no part of
you that thinks shut up about Israel and
talk about America?
He says also.
And which again, is the funny point, is
as we're talking about Israel,
to get the same response. They will attack
us for pointing at the genocide, but not
point to their own politicians for only talking
about Israel in the election conversation.
But he says,
also an annoyance of mine that no one
ever puts to rest. He says, Israel is
always there for us. I was saying this
earlier.
Where? On the border?
When we have fires?
Crime?
Do they help us financially? Food? Build anything
for us? Do they die for us like
we die for them? Guys, the answer is
no. Unequivocally.
He says, I'm not being funny, guys. I
want to know how exactly Israel is there
for us. Maybe there's something I don't know.
So please fill me in because I've never
seen Israel do anything for us in America.
Maybe in the Middle East, when we're fighting
there for them, but for just America and
Americans never. And I would argue, not even
in that context.
Show me where they've done something for the
United States or rather for Americans
in regard to the middle the fact that
we're even there to begin with, or our
government military is is the opposite of that.
It's thank you. I'm glad to see. This
is my point right there about conservatives standing
up against the lies, even if you're gonna
vote for Trump.
Find your principles.
Now the squirrel makes a great point.
If liberals, he says, actually believed in the
lesser of evils, their lesser lesser evilism,
they would all support Hamas or Hezbollah.
As by any
conceivable metric, they are saints
compared to not only the genocidal Israeli rape
and death cult, but also their cult leaders
like genocide butcher of Iraq, Joe and Kamala.
Now really think about this.
In no way, at least from my perspective,
is that to try to say that they
are not, like, I let's put it this
way.
I've already gone plenty of times over my
thoughts on this and the middle you know,
the nuance around it, but even as this
is how I've said it. Even if every
single thing they've ever said about Hamas
or Hezbollah combined
were true, which they're not,
Even those all those inaccurate claims compared to
even a fraction of what the US and
Israel have been caught doing,
you would it it would blow your mind,
the the difference. So he makes an excellent
point. Not whether you support them or not,
if you're gonna pretend the lesser of evils
is something we're supposed to abide by, well,
damn. You would be pretending or you would
be leaning into those sides.
But that's not how this works. See, the
lesser of evils only applies when they want
you to be feel when they want you
to feel obligated to choose what they want
you to.
But here's a clip of Joe, who you've
seen before, important to point out, blindly supporting
Israel, which is still the case today. Look
at the Middle East.
I think it's about time
we stop those of us who support, as
most of us do, Israel in this body,
for apologizing
for our support for Israel.
There's no apology to be made.
None.
It is the best
$3,000,000,000 investment we make.
Whether or not in Israel, the United States
of America would have to invent an Israel.
Now what's funny is now you're seeing this
put forward by Republicans trying to make a
case, like, for this immediate moment for the
election. It's the same exact conversation for Trump.
I mean, again, I'll show you next of
I won't play them all, but the long
thread of obvious clips I have them of
him saying that he will do all he
will counsel you. Right? He will check he
undermine your rights, take them ignore your rights,
That he he says Israel should rightfully control
congress.
And guys, these are not my opinion. There's
not out of context. It's very easy to
see. Or remove the Jew haters from the
country, or the idea that he will do
all these things for Israel because Israel's because
Miriam Adelson asked him to because they were
always at the White House. Mean, he just
can't stop pointing these things out. So realize
that this is not unique. To protect her
interest
in the region,
United States would have to go out and
invent an Israel. Exactly.
Which is ultimately the point. Now I'm gonna
leave it there for the Biden point, but
let's get let's check this out. Overlapping this.
So here's Biden and Trump, by the way,
actively supporting this idea that Israel has to
exist. Okay. Well, here is Mint Press News
pointing out remember this guy? Weinstein?
Former American film producer and convicted sex offender
Harvey Weinstein stated his deep support for Israel.
And it goes on to say he hired,
which we talked about, the Israeli intelligence firm,
Black Cube, to spy out his accusers. And
as I understand it, to harass them.
Those are, in some cases, current
and former unit 8200 Israeli Mossad or Overlay
Intelligence.
Now, Sean, I I don't think who would
I forget if whether it's 8 specifically 8200.
The point is these are ex intelligence assets
or for or current that we're working for
a group called Black Cube. Black Rock, Black
Stone, you know, all these different overlaps. The
point is clearly that this is a is
a reason that he's that adamant. Is Israel
advocacy play any role in your life supporting
it at all?
I'm I'm an Israeli in my heart and
mind.
K? I love that country. I love what
it stands for. I'm proud to be Jewish.
When people see me lay 18, they can
subtitle it Jews with guns.
Now, here's just a thought. You know, in
other news, this article from Heretz from 2016,
Israel becoming a refuge for pedophiles, Warren's advocate
for child sex abuse victims.
From Israel.
Israeli media, Israeli advocate, Israeli conversation,
telling you that they're becoming a refugee pedophile.
Must be racist then. Right?
It's pretty desperate to pretend everything, even coming
from their own coverage, is somehow racist. The
truth is, this is something that needs to
be discussed that is being ignored.
Now, lastly, on a couple points on this
bigger 2 party illusion conversation.
I don't know if you've noticed but these
people really do still exist.
This guy simply says in response to this
clip from Patrick.
He goes, it's funny that you people think
that Israel won't be dealt with.
They're saving Israel for last. Oh my god.
We're still doing that? He goes, why? Because
it has to be this way. I guess
because some chat board told him. But he
goes, now pop a fresh batch of popcorn
and shut up and watch the movie unfold.
These are real people.
That's weird.
But it simply says, yep. These morons still
exist. Just wait, do nothing, sit back, trust
the plan, said no warrior for freedom and
liberty ever. Hashtag q. That's me.
This is the the account here.
The only the one and only
confirmed q. I just it's just sad. And
of course and why is it doing that?
Is it but but it's of course, the
point is that ultimately, this could be a
fake person. Maybe the entire queue thing is
driven by Israeli
apparat who knows? But, nonetheless, what's hilarious to
me is that we still pretend this makes
sense. Do you realize they were saying that
back in his last presence, his past
administration?
Or the idea that anybody would pretend that
sitting back and letting things happen is somehow
the logic of today? I mean, but my
point is this is still a huge undercurrent
within the current administration of Trump. Like, right
now. It is a huge undercurrent of their
current drive,
despite them not really pointing at it. I
find that crazy.
Now here's another point from Elon that I
think just screams the opposite of what it
says. He goes, Elon it says Elon Musk
says the real threat to democracy are the
people who accuse Trump of being a threat
to democracy.
So you are. You're the one. Okay.
The point is it's just a lazy arc
saying they're the one. The point is both
of them are projecting at each other when
the point that they're all doing the same
thing. They're all supporting genocide. They're all wanna
express your speech. They all wanna control your
life. But you're the one that's doing it.
Vote for me.
I just think it's pathetic quite frankly.
And then lastly, just to include this, this
is the the some voter drop box that
somebody has lit on fire. And it's just,
you know, to me, it could be anything.
I mean, realistically, we all know that today.
This could be republicans doing it to frame
democrats. It could be democrats doing it to
frame it could be the fact that there's
democrats trying to hide the ballot. Who knows?
But my point is simply that what you're
being shown is the idea that you can't
trust anything.
Fair out to get you. Now, of course,
republicans gonna see this as democrats trying to
do this just to unsubvert the election because
Trump's a shoo in. Maybe. Maybe. I don't
believe your vote translate at all. But my
point is this is about trying to undermine
all of it.
The we're in a position now where it
is about chaos. It's about trying to argue
that they stole this and they cheated that.
No. Whichever they've already told you. They've already
set the table that they're both gonna accuse
each other of whatever they need to to
get what they want.
So this is just about under bond, which
by the way, in a way, good. It
should be. This this A flawed, broken, deliberately
dishonest theft of a system.
So the fact that they need to try
to get you in the it's it's it's
They're losing control.
If only people could recognize that, and we
could stand together as the American people, we
could change everything.
But this person, drag the the black truther
actually says, no effing way. I believe there's
going to be a cyber attack on election
day. This person's saying, you know, check-in on
the elections. And this person highlights it saying,
I don't think there's anything more certain. Of
course, they're going Iran, linked hackers broke into
the election, cyber
you know, all about the the narrative black
truth that then very highlights my clip here,
which you should check out, about 2 cyber
attack simulations, apparently one that's been canceled now,
or at least they claim,
by an ex Israeli intel firm, Cyber Reason.
Just like last time. Literally saying we're gonna
conduct Cyber Reason is still ongoing, by the
way. They're gonna conduct a election
simulation
on the day of the election?
I really don't think we can be this
naive.
As I said before, as I see in
the clip, the only reason you would do
this is to prepare yourself for wait for
responses for when it really happened. No way
you can do that when it's actually the
same day. So let's wait and see what
happens. And if you pretend this is anything
but Israel because this is being an Israeli
intelligence
entity, then you're lying to yourself.
Now lastly, quickly, this is the Guardian. Trump
fills Madison Square Garden with anger, vitriol, and
racist threats. Now look. I'm not calling them
Nazis. I think it's a silly argument in
this context. I think it's the height of
the things. But you have to be honest
about there's plenty of elements there. Even Look,
I'm Puerto Rican.
My father was literally born in San Juan.
And I've said that many times in the
past. I don't know if the the new
reviews knew that. But my largely, my my
father was born in San Juan. So there's
large He's, you know, 50% argue, I think
about.
My my grandmother on his side was was
actually Menominee Indian. So there's part of that.
And then my mother's side of it's pretty
kind of muddled, you know, white European, whatever
else. But at the end of the day,
I I could argue that I'm outraged because
the Puerto Rican background who cares?
I'm so tired of this selective outrage or
even even if it insults you. Get over
it. He's an he can say he's an
idiot and he said a dumb thing or
he said it even it's a joke or
whatever you wanna say. The point is you
get every right to say that you're a
disgusting person because you think he meant this
or he did that, maybe he did. But
why do you let it dictate your life?
Move on. And the idea here is that
we're trying to make it about the idea
that this is something bigger.
What he said was about something, you know,
the trash and the you know, the whole
point about Puerto Rico, which okay. If we're
gonna actually get into it, we have to
acknowledge why that place is the way and
then that has to do with foreign policy
of the US government. But either way,
it's about distraction.
Instead of caring about the obvious genocide and
the obvious racist
diabolical interest that both sides are driving through
that, we pretend that we're outraged about some
stupid joke about Puerto Rico.
That's I mean, of course, that that's how
this works.
And every and both sides get pulled into
a 2 party division tactic.
Now here's the funny part for me to
end.
I'm actually gonna do this last part later
just because it has to do with that
image. I'll go through it later. It's just
a a good point. Well, no. I guess,
I did say we're we're so far along
today. We're about 5 hours.
But this is funny to me. So this
person goes, Jews for Trump have arrived to
the rally in Madison Square Garden. We still
calling this a Nazi gathering?
Well, yeah. I mean, only dumb people would
because I think it's pretty stupid to argue
it's a Nazi gathering. That's just completely inaccurate
whether or not there's racist overtones.
But you you realize how this is funny
to me that you have these so this
is a Zionist
Jewish person.
Was she, now, was she the same one
calling those I mean, we just saw Stefanik
do it. Was she the same one calling
those
rallies?
Anti Semitic rallies?
Right? You mean you mean the rallies that
I was going through the wrong spot. You
mean the rallies that that were hosting
let me grab real quick.
People like this?
A holocaust survivor.
My message to the brave student protesters
in America is just keep doing it. Don't
give up. We are doing exactly the same,
and in the long term, we are going
to prevail. How about this?
Come have some masa. Come have some matzah
ball soup. We're having a great time. We
got plenty plenty to go for everyone,
and we'll be out here having a really
lovely holiday.
Cambie University has been at the center of
pro Palestinian
protests for more than a week. See podcast
that says Jews for Palestine behind it. Right?
She can sign. What about this one? This
is the first time I am using my
full real name,
to stand in solidarity with Palestinians.
And
I
I don't deserve a fuzz because I am
too late,
because
every single day that we don't speak out
as Jews in support of Palestinian Liberation
is another day too late.
Ah, okay. Now you get the point. Right?
So it's amazing that these Zionists
are willing to make the same point and
say, look at these Jews. They are there.
They can't be Nazis, but all of those
people are all in so even the Jews,
as people like Ben Shapiro said, are trash,
and they're not real not they're not real
Jews. That's what they would that's what they've
said.
So you're what so you're you're you're able
to make the logical point here, but you
can't apply it there, so you're a disgusting
hypocrite.
But we know this already.
Right? It's just embarrassing.
The point is that neither of them are
what they play made them out to be.
The left wants you to think he's some
rabid Nazi, Nazi, which is ridiculous. But if
you you are fascist, I might agree with,
but same with the left, which is the
same point. It's your government driving in the
same direction. But the idea that you could
pretend that these Palestinian protests, like Stefanik, screaming
the same thing at his rally,
is anything other than people fighting for Palestinians,
and you and you making that out to
be racist. Or as I've shown you in
the other clips,
the same protest leading by led, most of
them, put on even by groups like Jewish
Voices For Peace.
Or the idea that you can see Christians
and Muslims and Jews and black people, white
people, all at the same rallies, but they
still love to tell you it's all about
racism.
Even go to the point of calling you
Nazis.
It's points like this that just kill me.
Because you could ask her right now about
those protests, and she will tell you it
was all of them to a man. Nazis,
racists,
anti Semites, Hamas, terrorists,
even the holocaust survivor. But she wouldn't say
that. Here's another example. Matt Walsh. Have you
noticed that Donald Trump always wears a suit?
Even in an era where politicians often dress
casual, he still wears the suit. It seems
odd. Almost suspicious until you connect the dots.
Well, more of just a joke, making fun
of them. Always making the point about is
that, well, if you're gonna try to pretend
that they did this, that means he's a
Nazi or the rally looks the same.
That means wearing a suit. He's just he's
trying to downplay it. And I agree. It's
a stupid overlap. But the point is not
that they had a rally that looked like
this, therefore, that's the case. That is the
corporate media deflecting from the bigger truth of
the the the point that we're all making.
It's not left to right. The reality that
all of them are actively leaning in with
a group that actively worked alongside
these actual Nazis.
That is not a joke. You can look
it up on Wikipedia if you actually care
to follow through. The evidence is out there
and obvious.
The Israeli government
worked alongside
the Nazis.
And if this is, let's see.
Yeah. Perfect. Right there. One of the things
that grabbed really quickly. But, I mean, this
alone has all the evidence you need.
This is a per this is a girl
like, one of the guys that was literally
working. I mean, this this it says the,
Israel Yachin was the member of the Lihe
party. A Lihe party was the origin one
of the origin aspects of Zionism that twice
attempted to align itself with Nazi Germany. Here's
an article literally talking about it. Wikipedia
outlines it. And he says the Lihey
continued to seek an ally with Nazi Germany
even after the final solution.
So that is Zionism, guys. That's one of
the they still give a Lihey pin to
people that do things in the Israeli military.
The bottom line is that how are you
gonna pretend that you set this up to
fight against these things when you were working?
It looks like we've all been deceived.
So the point
is to realize that there is a that
that deflecting to
the downplaying of the or rather playing into
the corporate media deception
is only hiding the bigger point. Well, he
the the daily wire is all about that
when it comes to Israel.
Even though I've given plenty of credit to
Matt Walsh when it comes to the trans
conversation. You didn't imagine the excellent work there.
But here's the same point. Here's terrible.
And this is just the same kinda thing.
There's some meme about how, you know, it's
only bad when, you know, Trump visited or
that that Hitler
oh, well, actually this is different. What he's
saying here is that it's a goose saying,
like, if he's Hitler, why didn't he do
things Hitler wise in his first term?
Well, yeah. Well, how about we talk about
the assassinations and the ongoing occupations and the
illegal acts and the supporting of Israel who's
all killing the Palestinians.
Right?
But you see, no. No. Not those things.
We we want you to pretend that nothing
happened. And now only
yeah. But we won't get into that. But
Terrible, one of the self proclaimed leaders of
the alternative media that she puts in that
thread, even though we're talking about the nation
of alternative media, gives this clip and says,
never seen a Nazi rally with Jews, blacks,
and Hindus as speakers.
Right. Okay. Now let's go back to the
Palestinian ones. Oh, they're terrorists. What about the
Jews? Not real Jews. Okay. So you're a
hypocrite.
And what's they've done? All of these people
doing the same thing. It's the it's the
idea that because there's a token person here
and I'm not even saying that they are.
I think they're both being misrepresented.
But the obvious reality is that this is
a hypocritical stance while you are all acting
like Palestinians are simply terrorists.
Now lastly, very quickly, I was gonna just
point this out. You see this going around?
I find this to be hilarious. This Derek
Evans guy says, not only did they fake
the photo, they had to put her on
a white girl.
Now, for the podcast, it's a Kamala Harris,
which is a fake photo for for sure.
Of an old, like, an eighties era McDonald's
worker. But guess what? It turns out that's
not really the full picture,
which I think is really interesting. Now, honestly,
it seems like we can't even really suss
out where this well, I I mean, other
than one person claiming it. I'll show you
this right now. My point to end on
is that right now, just like the beginning,
just like the idea that they will make
up information around anything, like the Iran bombing.
You can't just acknowledge the reality. You have
to bolster it with fake images. That's everywhere.
So right now, we are being actively deceived
by everybody in the paradigm. Your your entire
government, anybody blinded by the partisan narratives, it's
everywhere. And so in this case, my point
is that even though this does seem to
go back to somebody who did this as
a joke and not with the interest of
some campaign or however you wanna look at
it, you have people like this that present
this as they did this and they faked
it, and here we are in which it
becomes the narrative.
Which I guess you could argue might still
be.
But what we know is that this oh,
I'll show you right now.
So by the way, here's just the old
image. This goes back to 2015,
which at least it's an older than that
picture, but only there's 2009.
So not new. Okay?
Now this is just these,
Snopes, which is funny to me because usually
when the republicans look at this, they would
say therefore it's the opposite. Right? Well, here's
Snopes telling you it's fake. So you're gonna
believe that one though, I bet. Right? How
that how funny that works out. But here
is an archive version from progress matters
from,
where was it? October 27th.
Now it's saying a few weeks ago, a
photo was posted on our page that falsely
depicted vice president Harris.
So what's interesting is you can go back
further than that and show this person
where was he? Right here.
Going back to yeah. So this was posted
on the 26th
saying the image is digitally altered. That was
the fact fact check. And this is somebody
saying, here's Kamal in her McDonald's uniform, and
this guy is the one saying that he
basically, this guy posted it saying that he
altered it 24th,
which then sort of cascaded around.
Right? And it looks as and, again, timing,
it's hard to tell. But this does say
a few weeks ago, so either way, this
either way, my point is either Progress Matters
posted this image, which then they would be
responsible for,
and they're claiming it was just something that
was shared, that's where they got it from.
What is interesting is that this does seem
to be where it was circulating, sort of
like posted online
before all this kinda piped up.
Either way, my point is that it becomes
whatever you want it to be. This is
not this wasn't gonna end with somehow you're
they're right and they're wrong. They're all deceiving
you guys. But what's fascinating to me is
that what we could see is a fake
picture, which is kind of easy to find.
They post it because I bet the the
way right? The way I sense it anyway,
is that they grabbed it because they thought
it would work for them. I'm talking about
the democrat side here. Didn't care whether it
was true. Used it because in that moment,
there was a narrative about how she was
lying about it. Right?
And hoped it would work.
Do you think they did their due diligence?
Do you think they care? Oh, fuck. Of
course not. They just want I mean, that's
my opinion, obviously. But that progress matters here.
And then, of course, when it turns out
it wasn't, they post this and say, we
didn't mean to. Maybe they did. Maybe they
men manufactured it. My point though is that
it becomes, on the other side of it,
some kind of a coordinated effort to manipulate
when you don't know that for sure. But
either way,
I just don't get why people will lean
into these political dynamics and won't and not
recognize that your party,
that you want to put that you wanna
fight for is in every way planning right
now how to manipulate you into doing what
they want.
You'd think they would need to when you
got support, but they do it anyway. How
they're gonna speak, what they're gonna say, fake
operations, operate social media campaign, all designed to
to influence you however they want you to
think regardless of how you feel.
It's it's everywhere, guys. It is the entire
conversation.
I'm just hoping people can steel themselves against
that. So new things come up, engage with
it, consider it, don't ever buy into it
entirely without doing your due diligence. And if
you can't prove it, then you leave it
alone. Or rather you just leave it there
and acknowledge it in that in that context
that we haven't flushed this out. But so
many people are unwilling to do that. Why?
Because there are people out there that will
lean into the opposite. And look at them
getting clicks and shares. And then look, if
that's all you're in this for, then at
least own that. Put a label on it.
Right? But at the end of the day,
there's people out there that I argue, like
the last American vagabond, you can decide for
yourself, who are
erring on the side of these things.
Erring on the side of principles and integrity,
honesty.
Even though I could be wrong.
Owning that, when and if I am.
I think these are not just important, but
paramount today. More so than they've ever been,
and I believe that's why you're here. So
thank you for supporting us and continue to
tune in to 5 hour shows and get
this information out there, break the clips out,
inform people.
Now I'm gonna be doing I'm gonna try
to get to another show before I have
to leave.
That's my plan anyway. But remember, I'm gonna
be leaving on the first. I'll be gone
for a few days. I'll be streaming on
the second for all day 8 hour stream,
which will be including some follow ups and
information but largely pertaining to the event. Again,
Again, I'm gonna try to get some more
content out before then. I have an interview
coming out tomorrow, but I just want you
guys to be heads up that, I mean,
this is gonna be the focus over the
next couple of days, if not the week,
because of, travel and whatever else going on.
But
continue to push this out, guys. Continue to
fight. K? It's never been more important.
If I I I urge you to whether
it's this show or whatever else or Derek's
interview or the clips, break this stuff out,
make the clips of it, share it on
your platforms, post it on your on your
video stream, you know, and and have conversations
about this. Gather with people you know, break
this stuff down, debate these things. Do and
emulate what they're doing there. Have an amicable
conversation.
End up okay disagreeing as long as you
can respect that you're coming at it from
an honest place. Because honestly, if you're debating
with someone from a dishonest place, well, there's
reason to be outraged about that. The the
if you're in a debate, it should be
about debating from something that you're trying to
you know, whether you agreed or not, debating
from an honest place is the point. Because
I I can actively try to debate from
something that I don't agree with, but I
would do it in a way that I
think is honest for what I genuinely believe
that you know, where it would come from.
It's all about the honesty. And it's amazing
that that in and of itself is sort
of, like, derided today, like, childish, if you
will. And that's coming from the This whole
might is right, which, weirdly enough, is not
a unique to the right thing anymore.
It's about
choosing what we believe in
and not letting them dictate what we're supposed
to believe in. And realize that these
core values of this country that guide a
lot of people's thought process,
we're not there anymore, guys.
They will scream those words out loud,
but the actions are what matter. And we
are not there anymore. But we are as
Americans. I believe we are because they pretend
to be and we want that. But your
government has long since been the thing they
pretend they are. And
choosing to select one of them from within
that controlled structure is only gonna give you
more of the same.
Well, I guess that's all I could do
for now. And I wanna be like,
don't do it. But, anyway, I mean, ultimately,
you gotta make your own choice.
All I ask is that you believe
in what you're doing and do not lean
into what people tell you you're supposed to
do.
I mean, I will be I will be
talking to you again before the election, so
this election
well, thank you for being here. I love
you all. As always, question
everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.