The idea that there's hateful speech, it's like,
yeah, okay. That's self evident. No problem.
Well, let's regulate it.
Okay. Fair enough because it's hateful, you know,
maybe we rather that there wasn't any of
it.
Okay.
No problem.
Who defines hate?
Well, we'll worry about that later. It's like,
no, you won't. That's actually the problem. Here's
the answer to who defines hate.
Those people that you would least want to
have define it. That will be the inevitable
consequence of the legislation.
Because sensible people won't have anything to do
with that. Like people who are power mad
will gravitate
to that domain
to make an ethical case to exercise their
controlling power over the language of other people.
Now, and I've had journalists say, well, what
makes you think that your right to free
speech trumps the right of someone to not
be offended? And I think that's really the
level of our political
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Tuesday, October 8, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today. Well, we're
gonna start with a sort of follow-up on
the conversation of free speech, the 2 party
illusion
perspective,
and the important dynamic of how it's being
played right now and show you and really
coming from an angle of the concept of
antisemitism
and how both sides are equally willing to
censor you around, well, anything they use to
justify the censorship of your speech for power
and control
as some people used to say before they
whatever. Whether it's Elon or or anybody we
would talk about. There's plenty of these examples
like I just played from Peterson where that's
the logic applies except this is not what
they're doing today. It's interesting
because there's now suddenly a reason they justify
it. Right? And this is the point I
wanna make today. Antisemitism
being the point with the new clip that
Trump just reiterated for, I don't know, what,
the 19th,
actually being accurate, like, the 9th time, I
believe, since we built in,
like, months. He's come out and made a
point about anti semitism, about how Israel should
have influence over our speech, over our congress.
It's alarming stuff that his audience
seems to ignore if they want to, but
I think increasingly more and more people are
becoming very uncomfortable about how obvious it is.
So we're gonna start with that point because
I do think it's very, very relevant.
But today in general,
it's more so gonna be like, we're gonna
get into what's going on, the updates around
Lebanon in particular and and Gaza as well
and some other important overview. The the bulk
of today, I think, is important. I actually
decided to shift a little bit based off
a clip that you probably have all seen
today
of of Liam Cosgrove
just calling it out in the state department.
And, you know, we've seen this a lot.
We've seen Matt Liebs, Sarid Arakot,
Max himself at some point,
which I I think he probably got kicked
out. But the last time, he was just
holding his feet to the fire, wouldn't let
him stop. And so, like, I I think
that's probably why, you know, I I asked
the same thing about Sam Musseini, which is
the last one I was gonna mention. Why
they still allow him because of how often
he continues to push back? I think it's
because people are paying attention
and they often don't really call on him.
There's that famous quote where he says, I'm
just a potted plant because they just never
wanna call on him. The point is,
all of those people we've mentioned have been
pushing back in the state department, Matt Miller
or the rest of them,
how ridiculous it is. Just
as he calls it in this clip, BS,
out in the open, which is what it
is. You don't usually hear those kind of
terms in in the state department briefings. And
And a reason I thought it was so
powerful, not because it's
he's saying what we've always been saying, but
because he just had the courage to say
it right there in front of everybody. I
mean, obviously, knowing it would be a clip.
It's probably why he did it and good
on him because it's now getting attention. And
the way that Matt Miller responds, just righteous
indignation.
I wanted to use that point just to
wanted to show you that it happened. It's
more and more people are pushing back. But
to make it kind of a refresher course
of a lot of the things
the the way he frames it, that we're
all just fed up with this. Right? And
and the point I'm getting from that is
is the thing that I'm always talking about,
how the evidence is there.
And I don't just mean, like, this one
blog pointed out some document. I mean, as
we've all seen, human rights groups almost you
almost entirely.
The standing group, the the leading groups in
that field, almost in in unison calling out
what's happening. Every basically, every United Nations group,
but they just go Hamas, and apparently people
ignore that. But then country to country, the
peoples of those countries, most governments. I mean,
save for just a few voting no, vast
almost every country in the world now has
voted will acknowledge this is genocide and have
called for them to stop what they're doing.
And yet they just keep doubling down.
And individual cases, like targeting doctors, targeting hospitals,
lacking of evidence around their claims, or being
proven to have lied about bombastic claims, and
it just doesn't stop. Not only does it
not stop, they just ignore that or push
forward or keep pointing to it.
So we all sense I think that's why
that clip is getting reached. What Liam is
pointing out, we're done with your BS. We're
done. We're just done accepting this at face
value. Now most people in that room, as
you'll even hear in this clip, I'll make
a point when we get there, I don't
think care about that. I think they care
about their status, their position, their access journalism.
But good on those that are willing to
challenge that to make a point and to
call out their lies.
So I'm not gonna we'll go through a
lot of it. You'll see. Human Shield. And
it's not gonna be extensive in some of
the past cases, mostly because we've talked about
it a lot.
But from point to point, showing you the
the, you know, little one stop shop of
here, the provable evidence, whether it's scientific studies,
whether it's Israeli media themselves with their own
people and our government, army, and everybody calling
it out and they still deny it from
point to point. I think it's an important
show, more informative
than some
well, it depends on what you find more
informative, but this will be a very informative
show. So I'd like to start with a
couple of shout outs to some new work
or one new writer
as well as a new article that I
think is really important. Actually, I I'll I'll
take that back. I'll point Robert's article out
in a after this first segment because we're
gonna use his as kind of a segue
into how
shockingly dishonest the Israeli government is on its
face, provably,
using a story that Robert broke down excellently
that's still being pointed to by the US
and Israeli governments. A fabricated lie about a
woman that was kidnapped and sold from Hamas
or from Isis to Hamas and despite the
ideological fundamental differences and the fact that they're
actually enemies, you know, we'll get into the
actual reality of how this all went down
and the lie that's being proven in real
time that they lied and they just don't
care to segue in. Now before we get
to that, a great article called the the
a most instrumental myth.
Now this is written by Aaron Galvin, or
just a thought, on Twitter.
And it's an important breakdown of the one
of the many different kind
of logically inconsistent or, you know, the the
constructs that are used to manipulate us. And
this one is a basic one. Like, we
talk about the 2 party illusion, the, you
know, divide and conquer. This is about good
and evil.
And we've touched on this a lot over
the years, but never said it exactly like
this, which is the simple idea of the,
you know, Iran bad guy, as I would
say. Right? Russia bad guy. We're a good
guy. They're bad. This childish binary idea that
people are inherently good or bad based on,
I guess, the authority figure pointing to what
they like you to think.
And her point is I've always said as
well that it's about choices in life. You
don't get born good and bad. You don't
get you're not born a Jewish person and
therefore a bad person or born a Christian
and therefore a bad person. And there are
people that feel this way or a certain
color. And, hopefully, it's becoming rapidly,
shockingly
clear that that's the people telling us about
how we are supposed to be. The governments
we're talking about, the US and Israel, the
Zionist organization. These are the people that are
actively using on its face racist
what's the what's the I'm blanking on the
other terms. Just, you know, racist ideology.
Explicitly telling you, we are better than you,
we are different than you, you are lesser
than, and we're and we know this is
there. I'm not even just talking about Zionism.
We see this in the world. It's racism.
But my point is people in power are
the ones pretending to be something different while,
in fact, driving you to feel manipulating you
through those channels. Right? So, in this case,
our government is inherently good because they're powerful.
Right? Because they're the US government. And the
group the groups they point to are bad.
Just broadly, Iran, bad.
Despite the nuance to every conversation, and therefore,
because we act within that paradigm,
there's no conversation in which you can just
go, oh, well, those actions are just what
a country did. No. It's because Iran did
it. They moved boats. Therefore, they're terrorist boats.
Oh, I see. Right? Oh, no. That's just,
you know, I you know, you get my
plan go off forever. It's right now going
off the, you know, terror tunnels and terror
dungeons and terror it's insulting.
These are just locations that could be used
for any number of the that's how this
works. Or in this context, she makes it
a little bit more specific
in the idea about
who we are as individuals and how we
view ourselves through this lens. And if you're
a wealthy,
well-to-do high with a great job and a
lot of influence, well, it it almost becomes
accepted that you're a trusted
good guy.
Right? Because you're an expert in your field.
Well, what does that have to do with
their internal intentions, with who they are as
a person, with their lack of morals if
that's the case? Well, nothing. And that's the
whole point. That's why you have a lot
of sociopathic maniacs who are very influential, who
are really bad people that get framed as
the good person on both Fox and CNN
depending on what we're talking about.
Really important. So make take time to read
this. I think it's a really great one
of these good points to start from if
you're really kind of new to this stuff
to realize that
if you're an honest person, it's easy to
fall for this stuff because they play on
our willingness to want to believe in the
goodness of everybody. And I'm of the mind,
as I've said many times, that I do
believe that most people want good and are
good because that and that's why they pretend
to be good. They wouldn't be trying to
convince you they're fighting for freedom while they're
murdering children if they didn't think that you
wanted good things in the world.
So remember that. So hopefully you'll see more
coming from her. It's a great article.
Now I wanted to start with one quick
thing, just a passing point that I thought
was crazy that Josh reached out to me
and was like, hey, check this out. It's
it's I'll just read what he wrote. Then
this overlaps with the idea of something I
recently said again on a recent interview and
that I mean, anyone that knows this shit
watches the show or followed by work
or is even capable of reading peer reviewed
science or investigate the fact that weather modification
is a shockingly real thing. It's very easy
to prove, that's been around for a really
long time. Now there's obviously very big differences
in the levels between, like, a cloud seeding
conversation and then just, you know, geoengineering and
just actual weather modification, which I mean, it's
simple stuff if you really break a lot
of the way these things work down. That
was a weird way to say that, but
Dane Wigginton has has done a lot of
work on the different versions of this. And
the point is, not to get into it
all now, I don't even think it's one
this is one of these topics that's like
pretending
geoengineering is fake. It's like, how can you
even pretend that? I mean, at best, you
would be saying that everything they're doing and
their programs are all made up to convince
us of that. I could go along with
that. I could understand how that logic that's
that would make sense, I do disagree. But
in this case, they're just going fake. And
there are people that are still saying that
about geoengineering
While they're literally conducting programs to stop to
dim the sun. It's just because people get
so trapped in their mindset. And that's what
social engineering looks like, almost to a cultish
level. That's what we're seeing right now in
the paradigm. So back to this point about
whether engineering or whether manipulation, whether, you know,
modification, these are real things that have been
studied, that have been worked on. Now just
because they've been studied or there are patents,
for example, does not therefore mean they're real
or in action.
But all that's to say that I I
for many years, people myself and others have
proven that this is something that is happening.
Now the question then is, is that what
we're seeing today? And I think that's a
hard line
because I don't think that's been proven. In
most cases, this comes up to comes up
in
but nonetheless, I'm like, you don't even have
to convince me. I I'm I'm gonna push
back on whether we can prove that it
happened, but not whether we're debating that it
can happen. That's an important distinction.
So he brings up a pat a patent
that I just thought was really interesting. Now
even that whole conversation aside, this patent should
be interesting to you anyway. I find this
stuff interesting and terrifying at the same time.
And he said, the patent I found, of
course, with Bill Gates listed as the inventor,
titled Water Alteration,
Structure Applications, and Methods.
And it says outlines technology focused on altering
environmental conditions,
particularly wind with particularly the temperature and composition
of surface water and subsurface water in oceans.
Now, right there, obviously, you can see how
that could be used if you actually have
done your due diligence and understand men one
of the many ways that weather modification is
possible that could tie in together. But it
gets more interesting. But even that in itself,
I just find that these people are just
the way that they
there's so much of this behind the scenes
of manipulation that we don't know is active,
you know, and and what and I'm not
talking about patents. It's just like real time
stuff that worry it it worries me how
many people are still blinding themselves to what
these people are capable of. And I'm not
many different groups I would frame as these
people in different conversations, whether it's government or
big pharma or I just think we need
to acknowledge that they are, without question, willing
to test on us, willing to sacrifice us.
You know? And I'm just talking about for
for whether it's for money, for influence, for
control, for covering up something. I mean, 100%.
This is not a movie kind of conversation.
This is real stuff, and we've seen this
throughout history. So I'm just as a kind
of a side point, let's just acknowledge that
we live in this kind of world and
fight to make it more accountable for that
reason. But he and he shows a little,
a couple of the patent images, and I've
got the patent right here that you guys
can check out for yourself.
And he and he also points out, you
know, look at the area that they're using
to make this point. That was interesting. And
in the patent it says, a method to
generally describe which includes environmental alteration. It says
that right there, environmental alteration. Further the method
includes generation movement of the water adjacent,
adjacent to the surface of the water in
response to placing.
He goes on to say, theoretically, the technology
described
in the patent could be used to strengthen
storms. Now he's clear about this, and he
responds down below as well, that it's actually
being framed as diminishing
storms.
But anyone that would say, you know, that
doesn't say. It says diminish. Not any he's
not claiming it says the opposite, but you
realize that's how like, for instance, the insect
allies conversation. Do you remember that? Where I
I probably just pull that up real quickly.
Where they came up and said,
we're going to use I can't type.
There it is. We're going to use insects,
genetically modified to protect
crops.
Okay.
Didn't work though because basically scientists everywhere in
the world were like, no. You
and sign documents and said, nope. That's pretty
much a biological weapon. You could just use
it the other way. And they quietly went
away with it, except it didn't go away.
It just turned into GMO mosquitoes,
and it's very real. And I've played that
clip many times about the self spreading vaccine
where they reference the same dynamic in this
field. It this is what it is. This
is the same thing. It didn't go away.
They just pretended to stop it and he
called it something else. You know, like, common,
real core and or, main core and
and,
total information awareness and men volunteer. Right? Or
today, no. No. No. We don't like CBD,
but we'll give you or CBDC, we'll give
you a privatized version. That's always how this
goes. Just Just remember that this is the
point is they pretend to stop things only
to get you to think it stopped, and
then the partisanship covers it all up and
all of a sudden it happens in 37
different ways. But to this, when they're talking
about using this to diminish it, it could
just as easily be used in the other
way. So just make sure you understand how
obvious that is, and that's usually how these
are framed.
But then he says the core principle behind
this patent could be, you know,
used either way. The ability to manipulate water
temperatures and compositions could, in theory, be used
to increase the energy available to storms. I
agree with that. Storms like hurricanes well, you
know what? Just for the interest of time,
since I have a lot to get to
today, read it for yourself. I think the
point is clear. It's just yet another patent,
of course, with Bill Gates' name on it
that happens to be related to this exact
conversation.
I find that interesting. Nowhere is that am
I saying that that proves connection or anything
like that. Just interesting data points, but it's
these are the kind of things that would
be disregarded by the kind of people that
wouldn't want to think about the reality of
how these could be used.
I'll include that for you to look at.
Now another the other first kinda starting point
really is around the 2 party illusion
and
the anti semitism in particular with the next
part of the segment, but just about free
speech and about how you are being, in
my opinion, being played. Now first, I just
wanna start with this really interesting tweet from
Elon that's talking about this weird thing that
I've looked into recently called poly market, which
is there it's it's inter so it's essentially
buying votes, but not real votes for the
election, but like a sort of like a
you can
bet, and you bet you vote, and you
pay for that vote, and then they the
money you paid gets tallied. And you can
see here that whoever gets the more money,
or rather just the more votes, they they
theoretically win on this mark, and you can
win money based on this and get it's
betting, essentially. I'm like, this is really strange.
I mean, obviously, people bet on everything. I
mean, if you don't you don't know that
if you look up, like, Vegas will you
can you can find a bet on damn
near anything. And that's what's pretty alarming for
me is the way that our government and
people are influential.
They bet on human markets and environmental markets.
And that's where, you know, Whitney's talked about
this, Courtney's talked about the natural asset companies.
Like, that's what's starting to happen. It's a
weirdly eerie thing where this is happening at
the same time. Now it could be nothing.
But I just personally find it interesting that
this is happening
and what the connection is. Why do they
point at this? I mean, I get the
sense that you're saying, well, they're voting.
Right? So that you could just look it's
it's like a poll, essentially. And they're even
paying for it. So I would even argue,
I get it. That makes it seem like
it's more valid, like they're willing to pay
for it. But I I just don't know
how you know, I've looked in a little
bit. I don't know if you're able to
pay for more votes. Can you buy more
than one? You know, the whole thing seems
very strange to me. I get the sense
that it's just about the idea of of
kind of a segue into a new type
of thing. Just my personal gut feeling on
it. The idea of of the monetization or
tokenization of all of this to make it
more about a a gambling idea. It's very
strange. Or it's just a poll. But it's
people are pointing at it like he is,
saying,
victories Oh, this was actually This says, Kamala
is collapsing before her eyes. Now, just to
be clear, this has literally nothing to do
with the actual election. And even if you
think that, my opinion is that nothing does
because it doesn't exist, your votes don't count.
And they've stolen that from you. If you
don't know what I mean by that, check
out my other shows. I'm not gonna break
off on that today. But I find it
interesting, and he says victory is not enough.
It must be absolutely decisive victory.
Now what's weird is that this did just
shockingly break off all of a sudden over
the last, like, just on October 7th?
I just did seems pretty weird to me.
You guys can decide what you want. Now,
to start though, before we get into another
one, I found this clip very now I
do believe this guy is a pretty partisan
guy. That doesn't shouldn't change the the data,
but as always, just consider that. But going
through, we'll come back to the voting part
and we'll come back to the free speech
part.
But quick sidestep on this because it does
relate. I find this very interesting. So this
guy just says total b s from the
sellout Elon Musk. Oh, you know what? I
just realized that I didn't grab this. So
this clip is essentially him pointing out what
many of us have, and we're gonna get
into a little bit as well, kinda like
the larger conversation of Israel,
that Donald Trump has called him a a
fraud and a fakestir and a sell out
and and Elon has said very terrible things
about Trump. And then, you know, Vance said
Trump is a terrible person. RFK said Trump
doesn't make it like, every one of them
have very clear examples very recently of calling
each other like the worst person and untrustworthy
and a set of and a fraud.
And now they're all together.
Though, of course, you could well, they were
lying, or they did it for politics, or
they changed their mind. But I do find
it impossible to pretend like it all like,
how do you pretend like it all makes
sense?
There are other and either show you that
they all lie about everything and that's what
I kinda think is the reality. They're all
just politicians or grifters in their own way.
Now they're just finding a way to benefit
themselves or they think they can make more
change that way.
Or
they're all were telling you the truth and
now they're shoved together for some reason that's
not of their own making. I mean, it
I don't know how we overlook a lot
of this stuff. So going to the same
point, watch this little quick clip and we'll
come back.
Get back into it.
Creepy as hell? Like, how Oh, and that
was the other thing too. Just so it's
clear, this is a real picture of him
while he's shaking Donald Trump's hand.
I I mean, I I looked just to
make sure that wasn't, you know,
some weird image where he's, like, jumping, you
know, doing something and it's no. It's not.
He's shaking Donald Trump's hand when he's doing
this.
I also kinda find that pretty weird. And
I would say it was weird about a
democrat too, ladies and gentlemen. I think it's
weird. What's with the face he's making? I
don't know. Because my my impression my impression,
like I said in the last show, with
the hat, with everything, with the new icon
on his
I think he's play I think he's making
fun of you guys. I think he's genuinely
making fun that you guys think this stuff
makes sense or is real. I think frankly
all of them do. I think all of
the people in these powers positions look at
you like you're mindless lemmings because you're bowing
at the altar of partisanship, but that's my
opinion. But look at what he does and
ask yourself whether you think it seems genuine
to you on an objective perspective, or that
he's playing a role. I'm sure it's hard
for people in it to see that, but
I think it's quite clear.
Ain't this shit creepy as hell? Like, how
unsettling is this? This is Elon Musk at
Trump's rally. What's crazy about this is that
in 2022, Elon Musk tweeted, for Twitter to
deserve public trust, it must be politically neutral,
which effectively means upsetting the far right and
the far left equally.
Now don't you find that interesting?
I mean, that's not what's happening. Right? Politically,
neutral.
Now, of course, the game that we played
is always as well. He's an individual citizen.
Right? The same thing that the people in
left or right would call out the people
in politics they don't like. But the point
is that he's talking about politically neutral. Well,
he is Twitter. Let's not pretend that's not
the case. He is a driving force with
the like, shockingly more views than anything even
times 2 behind him,
driving what gets talked about, driving what the
mob around him ultimately does. And that that's
fine. That's their prerogative. That's free speech. But,
of course, the overlap with
politics and whether he's in a government position,
whether he's an adviser or not, that does
change what he does even though I guarantee
it won't, legally speaking. But my point is
that politically neutral is not at all what
he's going on to say what he's doing
now.
And it's not equally outrageous on either side.
It's really not. Let's be honest about that.
And I that's that's not how it should
be played. I'm I'm in the mind that
there's a truth. And that often out outrages
one element in a dynamic. It's not that
we play it balanced. That's the corporate media.
Right? One story over here, one story over
there. That's false. That's fake information. That's an
illusion. There's no balance when it comes to
the truth. There's just the truth. But
politically neutral is not what this is. But
literally 3 days ago, he tweeted, Trump Vance
must win. I can't handle 4 years of
seeing and hearing Kamala Walls. That would be
cruel and unusual punishment. My question is, what
changed? What made Elon Musk bow down and
kiss the ring? Because I have That's a
good question though. Aside from the political partisan,
you know, you know, myopic view of what's
going on in this country. From a broad
perspective,
look at how many people have, on a
dime,
tr well, Trump in many ways. Elon,
RFK Junior. I mean, I I know there
are more. I was I was thinking about
it earlier. But there's a lot of people
that have just kind of turned all of
a sudden. And are now, oh, Jordan Peterson?
Like, where they just all of a sudden
take this hard turn
in not in every possible way, but in
obvious ways, and people just go, oh, well,
they're just compromising for politics. Well, you know,
maybe. But I frankly also find that disgusting.
You don't compromise your principles for some desired
outcome that never comes around and they think
they know that, but
I think it's obvious there's something else going
on. All the receipts. And I remember when
Donald Trump posted on truth social, when Elon
Musk came to the White House asking me
for help on all of his many subsidized
projects,
whether it's electric cars that don't drive long
enough, driverless cars that crash, or rocket ships
to nowhere, without which subsidies he'd be worthless,
and telling me how he was a big
Trump fan and Republican,
I could have said drop to your knees
and beg, and he would have done it.
Or what about the time that Donald Trump
called Elon Musk a bullshit artist in his
rally?
How do you how do you pretend like
you can say something like that and then
just change your opinion?
That he would beg?
That he would he was a fraud? And
now you're just oh, wait. I I'm wrong.
I talked to him on the phone and
now I disagree. I guess. That's pretty weird.
Elon,
you know, he said the other day, oh,
I've never voted for a Republican. I said,
I didn't know that. He told me he
voted for me. So he's another bullshit artist,
but he I think the most unsettling thing
about this is not even how he looks.
It's the fact that this is the man
who owns Twitter, a mass communication platform where
he manipulates and controls the algorithm. How are
we supposed to expect that that algorithm is
not gonna be manipulated for the interference of
this election? I guess it's true what they
say. When Donald Trump says jump, Elon Musk
says how high.
Got it. No TikTok thing at the end.
Yeah. It's I I mean, that whole thing
seemed odd. Right? I mean, I know people
love to frame
all of us at one point or another
based on what's going on as left or
right.
But I I my point is I would
I criticize all of them, I and I
really do. Yes. I'm clearly, at this moment,
concerned more about what's going on here. But
if you look at our entire track record,
that's case. My point is if this thing
happened with Kamal and Biden, I would find
it equally unsettling. What what it did,
the way it went down, the way he
was acting, the way he responded, I said
it on the show. It felt weird. It
felt like, I don't know, like he was
playing a role, like pretending. It felt strange.
Now that's my personal opinion. I could be
completely off.
Also, the the electric car thing I find
strange is Elon has like tripped double down
more than once right up to this day
about how that's the future and Vance and
everybody else seems to be saying something, you
know, it doesn't mean they can't just be
we disagree and that's okay. I would actually
appreciate that, but I don't think that's what's
happening. Based on, Whitney put out a great
kind of article slash post on Twitter about
this today. And the point being about how
they're using these people in her opinion,
r f k, it's like it's like a
it's like an illusion where he's coming he's
going around as if what he's saying is
Trump's policy even though there's never been a
public statement about that shift and Trump has
never apologized for the policies that RFK promised
he would have he would have to say
before he joined his cabinet. The assumption is
that happened. I agree with her. I don't
think it did. And what they keep saying
publicly shows you that's not the case.
His policies, everything. I mean, you know, with
the GMO vaccines or GMO foods, all these
things that are primary to RFK voters. I
mean, Trump's already shown himself to be root
loosening restrictions for these businesses.
Now, I hope he changes. I hope he
does influence him. I would love to believe
that that's what's happening, as always. Sadly, I
don't think that's the case. I hope I'm
wrong.
Now, so he shows you this. And I
think that's important to recognize the contradiction within
it. So back to the voting point.
The weird poly market thing, which I'll include
some you know, here he says,
Fisher King says, you can vote for a
living, breathing human being, Trump.
That's the the the way they frame these
things is just cartoonish.
Who will try to exercise the power of
presidency on behalf of Americans. Oh, do we
know that now? You know you it's it's
actually really embarrassing,
childish,
naive that people put this forward like you
know what he thinks and feels. As I
think I just learned this from, was it
decent with news? Sam Husseini calls it,
political
mind oh, now I forget. It's like political
mind reading or something like that. The point
being simple is that you're just projecting what
you based on what you want. Like, you
know, the US is doing this to achieve
this, and then Iran's doing this when, you
know, like, they frame it as, you know,
if you know if you're on the side
you want to project positive things, then you
frame it as if you know the intentions
are trying to free whatever. On the other
side, it is you will trying to, you
know, what you get the point. I can't
think of the way to write say it.
If it's the guy your adversary, you end
up claiming you you fill in the blank
about their intentions with the negative thing. But
they don't know what either of them want.
You don't know what they want and feel
and think. I say this all the time.
I I mean, we all can talk about
that. I make points like this, but I
make it clear that's my opinion about what
I think they're saying.
So when they say, who will try to
do this? We should laugh at that. It's
deserve deserving of ridicule because you're claiming you
know what Trump thinks and feels.
That's pretty embarrassing. And it says, or you
could vote for what we have now, which
I guess would be the Biden administration with
the VP. Right? But they love to make
it out to be everything Kamala, which I
could even get on board with seeing as
how Biden clearly is not all there. But
I think we all really know about the
president's the position of the vice president.
Except now, it's easier to make it seem
like everything is Kamala because that works for
what they want.
I quit that. We know that's the case.
But he says, a meaningless figurehead operating on
behalf of invisible people lying in their pockets.
Really?
So, hypothetically,
like
a technocrat,
Peter Thiel, Vance,
influent I mean, you get the point, guys.
It's the same thing everywhere.
We're talking about that. That's our government.
Or APAC, it is real funding. We're talking
about invisible people lining their pockets. Well, in
some cases, not invisible, but you can see
the people lining Biden and Kamala's pockets. In
some cases, you can't. It's the same damn
thing. They just are okay with the ones
that they can see on Trump's side. It's
just simply
hypocrisy.
And he says, exactly. Vote against the machine.
And like I said last time, guy, you
are the machine. Which all these people gave
me hard times for saying the word guy,
which I don't understand.
He is the machine. He is exactly a
part of the machine. He is literally building
the machine. He is being paid by the
machine, and he is literally the machine. And
I mean that in the sense of what
we're calling the machine. You are part of
it. You're a functioning part of the oligarchy.
You are a military contractor. You are a
billionaire. In fact, I think the what is
he? Isn't he the the virtuous version of
the world at this point? Close to anyway?
How in the world is this an outsider?
Oh, but he's sacrificing
everything to fight for is he? Well, no.
He's not they love to give you the
theater, but it's only growing.
His partnership with Garm didn't go away. His
acquiescing to government censorship is still happening according
to his own lawsuit.
He is the machine.
And he's still censoring, which is the point
we're getting into next. Right now, they're censoring
and you damn well know it. Censoring because
they're partnered with the ADL. They're telling you
you can't say certain things about Israel. They're
actively beginning to drive forward the idea that
anti semitism is on we're gonna get to
it. Donald Trump publicly saying we're gonna remove
the Jew haters from this country.
Well, look. Even if you think he genuinely
means people that actually hate Jews for no
other reason that they're a disgusting person.
That is their constitutional
right. This idea that we pretend, one, that
you're not allowed to do that because of
some legislation that's comp repugnant to the constitution,
which, by the way, I would agree. They're
disgusting people.
But secondarily,
you're gonna remove them from the country
based on something they think and feel?
I mean, how do we even pretend like
this logically makes sense? Thirdly, you know what
they're gonna say. He's just saying it to
get a leg. Oh, it's fun how we
love to put that out there when it
works for you. He's just doing that to
get their vote. Well, how do you know?
I don't know. I could I could agree
that he could be saying that to benefit
himself and won't do it, But I could
also agree that his track record shows that
he has done it and will continue to.
So it kills me.
Vote against the machine while he is building
it for you.
Now, again, I'll include these for you. This
poly market thing which I find really strange.
It seems to be largely focused around the
election, at least the top things right now
which I guess just exploded this time, like
it's gone crazy.
But it really basically is just a like
a political
casino.
Here Here it says, poly market is the
world's largest prediction market. It gives you the
opportunity to profit from your beliefs by betting
on the outcome of future events. Now, this
feels eerily like what the oligarchy, the elitists,
are doing with your life.
They they are, by the way.
Whether we're talking about the sustainable development goals
or ESG,
that's what we're talking about. And, really, it's
it's abstract
in the sense where
if they bet in as
as they would view it, are
apply or,
adherent
to what they're claiming is good even though
they've got passes for oil and nuclear weapons
because, you know, freedom. It's it's all stupid.
The point is that they are if they're
adherent to these things, they they get benefits,
essentially, from this whole dynamic. And And so
in a way, they're it's the same kind
of thing, or gambling. But at the end
of the day, it's also very specific. We've
gone over this on the show. It goes
into specific actions within communities, lives. I mean,
everything's being monetized and tokenized.
This to me just seems like they wanna
get you in on it, to make you
feel like this makes sense.
This feels weird.
You have a right to do it. Go
ahead. Bet with bet with whatever you want.
But I think this is more about social
engineering, quite frankly.
This says,
Poly Market.
I'll have to subscribe. Poly Market discusses fresh
funding amid election betting craze.
Let's see.
I knew it. I I wasn't gonna get
into this too deep, but I just wanna
include this for you guys to read. Curious
who the funding is, though. I'll come back
to it.
Now
this is interesting around the voting aspect. And,
again, all of this does kind of surround
around the part about free speech. My point
is to show you that they're all driving
you to invest in this election when all
of them are giving you the same outcome.
Now he says, for every person this is
different, by the way. This is not the
same thing.
Jack Posobiec says,
Elon's PAC
so by the way, let's not forget, PACS
and Super PACS in and of themselves are
what a lot of people see as the
problem. Ways to for them just to pretend,
like, this is just bribery and and money
influencing our out political outcomes. Where do you
think a lot of that comes from? Well,
you already know. Israel is a major player
in the way that the funds circulate during
an election, if not the largest player.
But he says his PAC is literally offering
to pay you
$47
for every registered voter you refer in a
swing state that signs this petition. Now realize,
their big point is that, well, the the
democrats are buying votes
via illegal immigration
to eliminate swing states. He said this 47
times I've seen. I should just 47 jump
to my head because he says that a
lot. I've seen him say this a lot.
So
isn't this buying votes?
Well, literally. Quite literally it is. But, arguably,
you could say, well, okay. He's he didn't
say what kind of voter.
But are we gonna pretend that your republicans
doing this are gonna go find democrats? Well,
no. I mean, let's let's just not let's
be honest with ourselves. We all know that.
There are gonna be republicans bringing in republican
voters.
Why? I mean, that's the whole point of
what this is. So,
of course, we could still stay back in
objectivity and say, well, you know, maybe,
generally, who knows? But we all know even
if he doesn't mean that, people that are
doing this are not going to want to
bring in because the whole point is for
a swing state, So they want republicans. So
this is Elon Musk's pack buying people to
bring in voters.
So I it's, I mean, it's, like, half
a step removed from straight up buying votes.
I find that wild.
But to be clear,
happening everywhere. It's not unique to Elon or
Republicans. But I think it's hilarious because he
says, for every person you refer, in a
swing state specifically, you get $47.
Easy money. Well, I said, well, didn't you
just get done telling us the left was
buying votes? You're all ridiculous.
I mean, think about how dumb it is
to go on this huge tyrant. And what
even more funny is that you're claiming, which
I don't I I disagree only with the
premise that we know for sure that any
immigrant from anywhere in the world, from any
standing will just vote democrat.
You could prove that's not true. In fact,
I think that's changed a long even if
it if it was ever true, it's changed
a lot over the years. Because we I
mean, did they didn't they again, that's always
how this works. Last election, they couldn't stop
telling us how the the black community was
voting for Trump and that them immigrants were
more so for Trump. But now because it
works from the other way, well, they give
you the other narrative. But I honestly don't
know. I don't think anybody truly knows because
each person out there has their own perspective.
But they want you to think they're doing
this because they vote for Democrats.
So at best, you could say that they're
spending money on immigration in hopes that they
vote for them. Wouldn't you argue that this
is explicitly voting, paying for votes, whereas that's
more abstract? Again, my point is they are
all doing it in all different ways that
we don't even talk about, Or cheating and
lying just like every single election.
To me, this is just comically stupid. But
you're doing and and as always, if you
get pushed hard enough, they're gonna go, well,
they did it first.
So you're the same thing.
More true than you think out there if
you're only first seeing the show, but it's
like anything else. They use cluster bombs, so
we're gonna use them. It's their fault. No.
You're a terrorist too then. You're just as
bad as they are no matter what your
justification.
So I just think this is pretty sad.
But, hopefully,
because we're talking about it, more and more
people, anybody else out there looking, it's starting
to wake you up to the illusion of
all of it.
Now, on the on the point of censorship,
because that's one of the points I really
wanted to reiterate. Because we know we just
made a long point about it last show.
But I wanna make this point explicitly again
in the beginning ish of the show because
I think it's important that people see this
if they haven't. And the and the deceptive
way they're trying to frame, one, really based
off what Hillary Clinton just said, which again,
she's like the worst person on the planet.
But it's important to understand what was said
and what the the the thought was,
and then to show you what's literally happening
on Twitter and what Yacarino and Elon both
agreed to.
Moderation.
Now, of course, the idea is that, well,
they want different moderation. Well, you don't know
that for sure. I would agree. They probably
have different perspectives, but now we're getting into
the realm of assumption,
which is always what guides these partisan points.
But it says the left controls almost all
legacy media, which again is a lazy point.
The left
is it's just like the right are very
multifaceted things even within their own group. And
are we so what are we saying? Does
the DNC control every social media platform?
I don't agree with that. It's very lazy.
I think it's the government. I don't think
there's a left right idea. I think it's
all about your government trying to manipulate you.
But let's just say you do believe that
they're left and right fighting for control, which
I think you can prove is shockingly false.
But, ultimately, you can see a lot of
other middle aspects of it. You could also
prove that people behind Twitter right now and
even Elon himself as a democrat or was,
or Yacarino from the World Economic Forum or
Diddy Onyx. All these different people behind it,
and yet we still pretend just because they
say certain things. It it just seems kind
of a lazy argument. Right?
Either way, let's just say for sake of
conversation that the left
controls
all legacy media and social media platforms, which
is the point he's making, which I very
clearly would see we all could see a
slant.
He says, except this one.
Which
if we're coming to the point of actual
censorship, which is what this is ultimately about,
or freedom of speech,
there is no difference.
I mean, we we're I mean, right now,
quite frankly, I've I've seen things going on
around other platforms that are usually more in
the censorship field, even like YouTube, for example.
There are things I've seen censored on Twitter
that aren't censored on YouTube and vice versa.
But I think it's interesting to see that
when it comes to anti semitism, when it
comes to this concept of hate speech, which
is what they're pointing out when they say
antisemitism,
that they're on the same level.
And he says, we strive to to to
be a level playing field for all views.
Does anybody believe that? Even the people out
there who wanna pretend this is the case,
you know damn well that you're happy to
see them censor
criticism of Israel, which they're doing right now.
Ev I mean, I I everyday I'll show
you more today, I think. We just went
over the one about the the guy talking
about Russian discussions.
It was Mark Leslovoda pointed that out. Don't
they censored him. And he he spoke up
about it. No one cares. Or even I'll
I'll show you next about the January 6th
people that have never been brought back or
plenty of COVID pea doctors and scientists that
are still censored.
Now that they haven't brought them back is
a bit different than continuing to, but they
are doing that too.
And we've proven this. Peter Sweden simply says
the left is mad, outraged that Elon's supporting
Trump.
Alright. Maybe on their personal petty levels that
don't know what's really going on, but my
point,
it's all part of the game.
I think it's all this is just more
aspects of your government playing the shadows in
the cave in front of you to convince
you that you're fighting for us one side
versus the other. They've been doing it for
our entire existence.
This is what they are completely silent about
George Soros buying 200 radio stations and Google
supports supporting the democrats.
I mean, so to me what's funny about
that is, you know how many parallels you
could make of republicans doing similar things, of
republicans or republican platforms, rumble and support. I
mean, it's all because those are outrageous to
them whereas the other ones they see as
a good thing. It's all personal perspective and
it's hypocrisy at the end of the day.
Oh, yeah. This is just you know, interesting
point by the way. We talked about this
this morning a bit on a and wake
up. Now, I don't agree that everybody pointing
things out that are going on in
North Carolina, for example, are
misinformation
hurting the flow of a I quite frankly
think the obvious part of it is that
our government is dragging its feet or or
straight up allowing people to be hurt for
lack of liability or their own financial interest
all the way to the top or all
the way to the bottom. I believe that.
And I think it's provable every time. That
does not mean that I think everything being
said about this is true. And and we
and what Steve said on the show today
is there's somebody they've
somebody close to him has a friend that
lives in Chimney Rock
and is openly saying
that there these Republican and and I believe
that guy is even a Republican. He's saying
that these Republican
broadcasters
are flagrantly lying. And by the way, I
agree, just like in every other time we've
talked about.
It's it's just I mean, it's it's not
unique to left or right. It's just different
topics. Like we've seen during COVID, the left
was lying through their teeth about everything. The
point here is that they're
making stories drive this in while that ultimately
stops the awareness of what is going on,
whether even that is weather modification or something
else.
And it's stopping accountability for what we can
prove. Like every other one of these, like
East Palestine or Lahaina.
It's be it becomes bombastic and it goes
to the stuff where we can't prove and
we focus there and we get lost in
that deliberately, I would argue, and nothing ever
changes.
Someone's to think about that. So when this
guy's simply saying, why is MAGA interfering with
and crippling FEMA efforts? I don't agree with
the broad stroke. I don't. But I do
think it's important to recognize that even though
those posts about how misinformation is hindering something,
we all reflexively push back on that today
because they are always using that claim to
suppress what we're saying.
But realize that they're even even even in
the past around conversations where they are doing
that, I can still show you that people
step on top of true things and lead
you into the ground. There's a government agenda
for that. So don't forget that.
Now he says, dear Elon, I hereby request
the reinstatement of over a 150,000
Twitter accounts that were permanently suspended on on
January 8, 2021.
Many of these accounts were targeted for removal
by the old Twitter and were also great
resources for news and theories on your platform.
By reinstating them, you will show your commitment
to the level playing field. Yeah. Do you
think it's gonna happen?
Well, we should.
Right?
I mean, but I at the end of
the day,
I think what we know if we're paying
attention today is that they are still censoring.
So why in the world would we pretend
like this would give you any indication that
they're gonna do anything different?
So right now, without question,
an objective person can see that they're still
censoring, which is not even a a that's
happening.
Without question. We keep showing you counts that
have taken down. They ain't even backed things
up. Even right in the beginning. Whether it
was,
Fuentes or anybody else, or Diddy. They or
who was it? Was it,
that's interesting.
Who was was it Diddy in the beginning
that I don't wanna jump into it now.
But the point is,
they've censored. They just have a justification for
it, which they people who don't wanna see
as a problem will ignore and pretend like
it makes sense. But right now, they are
censoring.
They are censoring. And they're working with the
ADL, that's publicly stated by Yaccarino,
and they're working with all sorts of groups.
They were partnered with GARM, like we said.
It's very clear to see that they're acting
in line with what the government's doing. And
they have they proudly stated, you know, freedom
of speech,
not or freedom of speech, but not reach,
off of a waffle, right, that they will
take things down if they decide that. And
top of that, that they will allow moderation
to decide and ultimately restrict funds if they
don't think that it is something they agree
with. I'll play it for you again. That's
directly from her mouth. Okay. So the clip
we'll play for you again from Clinton, which
is equally concerning,
is simply saying that we will lose total
control if we don't
in moderate content. That was her point.
Okay. So if if you're more concerned about
well, the point is if they're moderating right
now and are censoring, how is that any
different?
And on top of that, if you're gonna
pretend she meant we lose control that we
currently have, it's the dishonest way that everyone
on the Republican side of this is framing
it, doesn't that then mean that she currently
has control of Twitter?
Yeah. See, logic plays a factor here, doesn't
it? If we're gonna lose total control, that
implies they have total control, which they don't.
Because you're claiming he runs Twitter. That's not
total then. Her point was, as always, you
know, trying to find the nuance in all
this but stop defending somebody. Well, she's saying
we'll lose control. It'll go crazy.
You know she wants to censor. You know
she doesn't care about your rights. But on
point is, neither does the other side. And
all they're trying to do is point at
this to make you outraged. The left is
gonna destroy free speech. They wanna change the
constitution. Again, showing you that you don't understand
the constitution, and you're doing the same thing
as Trump tells you, as we'll get into
next, that we're going to stop people that
are screaming about Israel.
How do you think that's gonna happen?
We gotta stop allowing these influencers to lie
to people. So this person says again, actually,
this is really interesting. This New York Post
which I've identified personally
since
I just
at least in the conversation of what overlaps
with Israel and just right now even stuff
like this.
One of the most dishonest platforms right now
in the kind of mainstream sphere in my
opinion.
Crazy. And I'll make an example right
here. She says, I do not want to
vote for Trump, but stuff like this gives
me no choice. Guys, so that's black pilled
for you right there. You're black pilled. You
are giving up. If you're going, I don't
want to, but I guess what? I have
no choice. Well, there is what they pretend
we're doing. No. No. We're giving you plenty
of other choices. Another path. Another you just
don't like where it goes. That is giving
up.
And, of course, Keely Keely points out again
that here's Trump doing the same thing. We
have to send to the Internet and work
with Bill Gates because ISIS is what he
was arguing a couple years ago.
Yep. But so here's my point. First of
all, here's the New York Post
as a supposed journalistic platform
deliberately misquoting her.
We lose control. Well, that's not what she
said. She said we lose total control. And
they even say it right down here, right
underneath it. We lose total control. Well, you
know why I think that's relevant? And maybe
I'm overthinking it. Because the point I'm making.
They know that if we say we lose
control, that implies that they have control and
that they're fighting to maintain it, and Elon
is trying to help you do that.
Well, if you listen to it with the
inflection on the word and you remove that
word, well, suddenly it has different context. That's
not journalism, guys. That is straight up propaganda.
And, again, Hillary Clinton is equally as concerning.
They're all doing the same thing.
So this is one of the clips we're
talking about. And I'll play it for you
really quickly. Here is Michael Shellenberger
just gushing over the idea that only Clinton
and nowhere else except for the fact that
a child could see that that's incorrect.
Maybe reflect on who has journalistic integrity or
wherewithal in the context of partisan lenses when
we talk about stuff like this.
We should be,
in my view, repealing something called section 230
which gave,
you know, platforms on the Internet,
immunity because If you have my comments on
section 230, go to the other show from
day before yesterday. I don't wanna get into
it again today, but there's important points to
make around. They were thought to be just
pass throughs that they shouldn't be judged for
the content that is posted.
But we now know that that was an
overly simple view that if the platforms, whether
it's Facebook or
Twitter x or,
Instagram or TikTok, whatever they are, if they
don't moderate,
and monitor the content,
we lose total control.
Okay. So, obviously, moderate
is the solution she provides.
And the way she's we lose total control.
Right. Okay. So right there, you could let's
even do it like this. You could look
at it 3 ways. And this is just
being honest about what's being stated. You could
look at it as she's saying we used
to have total control. And this would even
lean into Elon's point. And then Twitter got
taken from us. And now we lose total
control.
That would make sense. Or you could argue
that it means we just lose total control.
Like, as if we just lose it, it
goes crazy. We when everything goes out of
control. But the way that they're trying to
frame it as if they currently have it
and if we let this go, we then
lose control is just dishonest. But that's how
the partisanship works. It's just like what Israel's
doing.
Whatever works that day will change it tomorrow.
Because most people who go along with these
things don't really care about the truth.
Now, the important part here
is about
censorship.
Whether
even just taking it as what they pretend
it is. They are all that aside, they're
all calling for censorship. She wants to censor
you. She wants to control what you can
say for their benefit.
Okay? So that's not debatable.
So, it's important to recognize and here and
again, here was Carey, same thing. That, you
know, ta and they all mentioned Twitter, which
I don't think is by accident.
When, you know, when again, they all know
that they're currently censoring. Right? And and it's
just it's incredible that the
the theater is being put forward.
This should terrify all who love their freedom.
It's the way it's being framed. I just,
you know, I can't take these people seriously
anymore.
But he says they they he says, Bill
Gates 2 weeks ago, John Kerry last week,
Hillary Clinton today, all demanding government censorship of
x. Well, really what they're demanding is censorship.
And they highlight Twitter.
Right? But the but the point is, if
you're not gonna argue or highlight that Twitter
is currently doing this,
currently moderating content,
currently censoring people based on a number of
platform of discussion points, then you're just either
blind or dishonest.
This is hard to see this as a
coincidence. They appear to be laying a groundwork
for totalitarianism,
or you're just taking the bait as they
lay it out for you and you step
right into it and act like this is
the only one that's gonna save us while
ignoring the facts in front of you.
Our democratic republic is in danger.
At least he doesn't say democracy,
but to pretend like we even remotely live
in a republic or a democracy is childishly
naive or dishonest. And again, these are I
mean, we've had studies that came out from
Princeton that say for without question, it's an
oligarchy. It has been for a long time
in the in this country. But, yeah, people
like this, they throw these words out because
they're working for a you know, I I
don't know the intention,
but I feel like this whole this whole
conversation is about trying to convince you of
their viewpoint.
Right? So again, I don't know whether he
believes it or not is the point, but
I think it's obvious where this is driving
you. So either he is deceiving you or
isn't aware that this is not a republic.
I find that very important to highlight.
Now here is Yakinorino.
Now this is Yakinor versus Yakinorino. So it's
what she said at the beginning, and it's
what she said recently in a conversation. But
what we're showing you is that they have
agreed to moderate content. And now when they
talk about Garm, even though they partnered with
Garm and she knows that, so they all
are lying to you, that they pretend it's
them trying to do what they are already
doing. A select group deciding who gets finances.
Well, that's what you do, and you make
that point. So it's it's like 3 layers
of BS.
I was shocked by the evidence uncovered by
the house judiciary committee that a group of
companies organized a systematic illegal boycott against x.
Of an open feedback loop
for the advertising
experts in this room
to help
develop Twitter into a place where they will
be excited
about investing more money. Product development,
ad safety,
content moderation.
Content
moderation.
That's what the influence is.
That puts your global town square, the one
place that you can express yourself freely and
openly.
We have built
content moderation tools
that have never existed before at this company.
Okay. So how is that different than Clinton?
Right? I mean, so if if you don't
know what Clinton's proposing, she just says moderation.
So you could pretend that you know hers
is different. But it's not really about being
different, you see, because that just makes you
a hypocrite. It's about moderating your speech. It's
about censoring what you can say. And if
your only issue is on Twitter, well, they're
doing the same thing. I don't understand the
difference other than looking through a partisan lens.
And anybody honest with themselves would note would
agree with that. This is very clearly the
same thing. And as we see them doing
this for Israel, the left wants the same
thing, we need to recognize that this is
a larger manipulation.
If you are gonna post something
that is lawful,
but it's awful,
you get labeled at long term risk. More
censored. K? Because that is happening. There's no
disputing that. People are hurt when the marketplace
of ideas is constricted.
And we've introduced a new policy called
freedom of speech,
not reach.
No small group of people should be able
to monopolize
what gets monetized.
But more importantly,
if you're gonna post something
that is lawful,
but it's awful,
you get labeled,
you get de amplified,
which means it cannot be shared. Mhmm. And
it is certainly
demonetized.
So that's the same thing as what she
just said. A select group of people deciding
who gets monetized. Well, that's what you just
did. Talk about hypocrisy.
It's pretty infuriating.
So before we go into the anti semitism
part of it, I just think it's important
that we have the courage to point this
out. Especially if you are a conservative out
there and you see people that you look
up to screaming falsehoods.
Have the courage to point it out. Except
I think you somewhere in your mind know
that they'll probably just block you because,
well, hopefully, that opens a journey for you
on recognizing what we're really dealing with. But
it's important to see that the the consistency
of censorship is obviously there. Now I'm obviously
point out that there will be different angles
of censorship depending on who individually might be
guiding that.
But if we think that World Economic Forum,
Yaccarino, and oligarch technocrat, Elon Musk, are any
different than everything else we're dealing with, in
fact, the same exact dynamics, even them both
being democrats despite what they tell you now,
I just don't think you wanna see him.
We have to be honest with ourselves. Now
the anti semitism part opens us up even
wider. I think this is important. Now I
now this this is, I'm not sure if
you're familiar with the work online, Shogun,
making a point about Donald Trump and and,
what did he call it?
I'll just read a second. I thought you
did I guess he basically just talks about
oh, they just genocide in Gaza. Now to
be clear, this video is just him standing,
which I I isn't this is the guy
who's doing his transition team. Right? And which
he's working with,
Kushner and, you know, bay just and he
already said it. I mean, this is gonna
be the same old thing from the same
place. And it's exactly what Dan Daniel Gavin
has pointed out. It's obvious to me. But
my point is that he's just simply doing
this thing at the some, you know,
Jewish,
ceremony.
But, you know, I quickly looked up by
the way. It's interesting to me,
I get mixed res responses
from different platforms
on whether Christians are supposed to wear yarmulkes.
Now some of the current ones say, well,
yes, if you're at a dinner party or
at a an event, you know, ceremony for
like this for for the Jewish faith, then
it's okay for Christians to wear the yarmulke.
What's interesting though is that there are plenty
that say the exact opposite, like, harshly. They
say, no. That's that's they're not allowed. It's
it's a violation.
Interestingly though, you never see the other side
of that happening, at least in my experience.
You don't see the Netanyahu's of the world
come and do this with Trump and wear
a cross or something like that, which I
think says a lot. Either way, the point
though is that this video is just him
doing this.
So that that to be said, I'm not
implying that just because someone has Jewish
background or does a Jewish ceremony, therefore, it
means what he's gonna say. I just wanna
make that clear. Because I truly, and you
guys know, believe this is about Zionism and
not blanket statement Judaism. It overlaps Judaism just
like it overlaps Christianity, but it's about Zionism.
Of course, I could be wrong and you
have your right to think for yourself, but
you will get pushback on me for pretending
that I'm secretly wink wink saying something else
because I'm not. But he says, alright. F
this. So this is a Trump supporter who's
having his moment. And he says, been supporting
Trump since 2015.
Elevator speech. He says, my suspended account, which,
by the way,
is the point we're getting to, at least
from, you know, he.
America first org
is censored on Twitter.
Right? So there's an example of censorship under
Elon Musk. He says, is a testimony to
it, as well as patriots who know me
from back then. I cannot, in good conscience,
vote for somebody who supports a genocide in
Gaza. I am out.
I find that important.
So just showing you that people are fed
up. Now I'm gonna include this interview I
have with Dan Cohen, which I think is
powerful.
Dan Cohen is a Jewish person himself discussing
the problem of Zionism and the way that
Zionism is using Judaism. It's important to hear
this from people that are away that, you
know, have been researching this, that have been
a part of it, that see it. You
know, Dan has talked about how he's had
an evolving journey around this just since October
7th. But he said it's entitled the manufactured
Middle East Plight and the Zionism linchpin. It's
powerful.
So, the point to that is to recognize
that, you know, that that conversation and and
with what we're gonna talk about entirely
because their antisemitism
claim
is the linchpin of Zionism.
It's how this is I mean, right now,
it's falling apart, but it's how it has
been held together.
So Derek Burrows points something out. Oh, and
this here's just a thought, by the way,
point posting this about, the recent speech from
Trump and Elon Musk.
But Derek says, technocrats unite in the fake
election. Actually, I think
yeah, I think this should have been moved
over the other segment. I've I missed it.
But either way, technocrats unite in the fake
election, he says. On one side, you have
Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, funded candidate with a
record of lying. On the other side, you've
got Eric Schmidt and Alex Karp, funded candidate
known for nothing. Yeah. See, damn it. This
is per I there's a reason I had
this, and it would've been perfect after the
one I, you know, set up in this
main point to show you that they're the
same side and either same thing on other
side, but I missed it. I and you
see, as I said before, what I always
do is I'll line these things up in,
like, a broad category
and then take time all day, a lot
of the time, organizing them in ways that
make it line up. I just missed this
one. So not that I had to tell
you that, but that's why this is out
of disjointed.
But he says, neither will serve the people,
but will serve the Zionist lobby and the
Bilderberg group.
100% agree with that. And this is who
they want you to vote for. Well, either
side of it. Right? Now, just a thought
says, a political party of the US is
proudly uniting with technocrats like Elon Musk and
JD Vance, bankrolled by Peter Thiel, without so
much as a double take from the vast
majority of Americans.
Concerns about organizations like the World Economic Forum
have all but disappeared, and support for all
of its policies and more are now stronger
than ever. Now you may not think that,
but that's the reality. As Elon Musk is
spearheading damn near all every one of them,
and you're just not paying attention because
he's doing it. That's how I would read
anyway. If humans survive centuries from now, she
says, this moment in history will prove to
be the turning point for the technocracy. The
time in which Americans, believing they were fighting
for freedom, excitedly applauded their own digital prison.
Sadly,
there likely won't be any humans to look
back on.
Now, to antisemitism.
And the point that in all of this,
right, is the is the it's the guys
of one side versus the other when really
they're both driving for the same thing. That's
why I started with that clip from Jordan
Peterson.
No matter whether we're using the broad case
of hate speech or just focusing on one
version of what they call hate speech, which
is anti semitism.
And the argument being, as he said, that
people
power hungry
people will gravitate to this.
That's what we're seeing.
You just only in in many cases, people
just only wanna look at one side of
it.
So again, I have 2 new clips that
I've added to this thread. And I hope
that you'll take the time to listen to
these because despite what some of the
I would argue, bots in this chat are
trying to pretend, that's not what he said.
I mean, it's explicitly exactly what he says,
verbatim.
And I played the one that was kind
of opening for the show before we started
where he says that congress
used to be controlled by Israel and rightfully
so, very clearly.
Down here, he goes into 2 others. Now
in fact, I probably should just play that
again since you never know who might have
seen what and, you know, might not have
seen something.
But the point is we're gonna play these
to show you what he's discussing,
then
I'll play the 2 new ones that gets
into his statements that we quoted today for
the show.
You know, the biggest, change I've seen in
congress is Israel
literally owned the congress. You understand that 10
years ago, 15 years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And I think you know exactly what
I what I'm saying.
They had such power. Israel had such power
and rightfully
over congress.
That's pretty terrifying
as always.
And and again, the point on this episode
or this thread anyway is that every one
of these videos is saying a similar thread
of the same conversation.
As I say here, here are clips from
Trump's recent campaign trail event, which by the
way is
Amer Israeli flags. And almost every time now,
he seems to be introduced by Miriam Adelson.
Like, I I don't know why this does
not concern people. I mean, I guess it
only concerns if it was a a Chinese
military member or something. So something ridiculous like
that. But it says, Trump openly states that
Israel used to control the US Congress, and
he says that it will again when he's
president. He also makes it clear that your
constitutional rights will not be honored if you
criticize Israel explicitly.
Right? And and and we just played the
clip about the gun discussion. Right? Where, well,
the people woah. Your your first amendment. All
these people are stupid. That's what he says
explicitly about gun rights.
Here,
Mary Madison telling him how he gave them
whatever they wanted, gave them illegal, Golan Heights,
gave them to Jerusalem. So now we have
multiple new clips on top of these 3
new ones I added recently that say the
same thing. Listen to all of them. We've
got 2 new ones.
This one says, Trump's saying once again that
he will remove
the, quote, Jew haters from this country. As
I said, and it's important to hear before
you try to make it out that I'm
sub defending people that are racist.
1st, even as I agree that one who
hates another solely due to their religion, in
parenthesis, the Zionists, for example, are abhorrent,
Hating someone is constitutionally
protected
as is expressing that hate despite new
arbitrary mandates and, you know, if it's repugnant
to the constitution, it's null and void. That
is supreme court ruling.
Mayor Mabry versus Madison. Then it says second,
those deciding what constitutes, quote, Jew hate have
already proven to be deliberately dishonest by conflating
any Palestinian protest or any criticism of Israel
with anti semitism,
which by the way we'll get into next,
which is easy to prove. Even from the
Guardian, anti the the staff from the ADL
speak up about how they're conflating false things
with anti semitism,
or they admit they conflate them with anti
semitism to hide the real number. This is
what they do. So here's the first clip.
This is the one we quoted for today.
We will remove the jihadist sympathizers
and Jew haters. We're gonna remove the Jew
haters
who do nothing to help our country. They
only wanna destroy our country.
Well, right there to be clear, I already
see the conversation people are saying, oh, well,
he meant the race, the the terrorists. Well,
again,
you don't know that. You could pretend you
wanna think that. Maybe he does though. But
the point is, we're you can't jump to
say, here's what he meant because that's you
pretending you know what he thinks and feels.
But even if you wanna think that, again,
if you're not breaking the law, you're allowed
to believe what you want. Isn't that what
we all pretend in this country?
So you're not allowed to remove someone from
the country because of a view that they
hold. Period.
So the problem here is that he is
clearly trying to drive in that idea.
And even if you wanna conflate it with
real terrorists, you know, like the one the
US government supports all around the world,
you'd have to commit a crime for that
to make sense. And even then, we're talking
about your freedom of speech. Because because we're
gonna get into the reality that what he
is talking about is Palestinian protesters. As they've
him advanced and the rest have called Iran,
called Hamas, terrorists constantly.
So if you wanna pretend he thinks and
feels this, then you're simply ignoring what he's
actively said over and over.
We'll remove the jihadist
sympathizers
and Jew haters. We're gonna remove the Jew
haters
who do nothing to help our country. They
only wanna destroy our country,
and we will never let the horrors of
October 7th be repeated here on Americans. We
will And that's a big point because they
really wanna see it in your mind that
this coming to America, that they're gonna I
mean, I'm surprised there wasn't a false flag
yesterday, quite frankly, but they're gonna be driving
this idea. And I don't we already caught
a a
a facade element at the border that they
tried to pretend was a Palestinian, and then,
like, exposed that he was actually working with
Israel from the past? The republicans stopped talking
about it. We've covered that more than once.
We'll not let that happen, and we will
solve the problem that we have.
Right. The problem being that you have opinions
that people don't that they don't like. Now,
realistically, that could mean that you just that
you think Jews are bad. I would call
you a disgusting person, but you have a
right to think that. You have a right
to feel that and say that. That is
your constitutional
right. And, yeah, that's what it means to
defend free speech. It means defending the worst
speech.
But on top of that, we already know
what they conflate,
which I'll play for you next. But here's
the next one. This is another one. These
are all rapid succession. Well, so what is
that now? 12345678.
So I was down I was off by
1. Eight examples, there's probably more by the
way, of him explicitly
telling you that Israel should be able to
control congress, that they're gonna remove you if
you have certain opinions if it's about Israel.
Here's another one.
He this is this guy asked him point
blank, will you send the Department of Justice
to college campuses
to stop this?
Yes, he says.
Now let me turn to anti semitism in
the United States. Your your daughter is Jewish.
Some of your grandchildren are Jewish. Your son-in-law
is Jewish. Jewish students are not safe in
on many American campuses. You're False.
In fact, been proven false. Even by the
people lying about this stuff, even by the
media that was covering it briefly. We'll get
to that next. Like, you know, we've some
we've already broken this down. There's been major
reports showing you that they've blatantly lied or
fabricated events. Now, yes, there's anti semitism. Yes,
there's racism. It exists.
But on campus, it's been without that's why
it's not being hyped as much because it's
been clearly shown they were caught repeatedly faking
these events to make this case. And and
even this people like this are citing the
numbers from the ADL to make the claim
that it's an exploding rise. They're using Palestinian
protests and Palestinian flags to claim anti semitism.
So this is a false claim.
Semitism is Jewish. Jewish students are not safe
in on many American campuses. Your alma mater,
my alma mater, Biden and Harris have ignored
this. I mean, they really have ignored it.
No. No. I hate them there so much
anybody else, but they haven't because it's not
real. And they're absolutely what's happening is they
have talked about it despite these people pretending
they're ignoring it. This is the game that
always happens. They attack it. They scall for
censorship. They scream about how anti semitism
can exist. Trump does the same thing. They
just pretend like they didn't do enough. But
they're both doing the same thing. They're both
supporting Israel. They're both it's just funny how
that works. You're just not aggressive enough about
censoring, therefore you hate Jews. It's just being
in reality, they're both calling for the same
thing. It's crazy.
If you're president, will you send the DOJ
to those campuses, the office of civil rights
from the Department of Education to enforce the
law?
K. So to be clear,
will you send the department of justice and
other entities
to what he just set up the question
about stop what he claims anti semitism?
And so what he then says is to
enforce the law, which, of course, will give
people that wanna ignore it. Well, he didn't
say that. He said the law. And, of
course, we should enforce the law. Well, anybody
would agree with that, but you damn will
know what they're talking about. And the reality
is that in their minds, the law is
you're not allowed to say things about Israel.
There's already or, I mean, right this moment,
there's a bill that is about to pass
within our congress that says that any criticism
of Israel at all
or Zionism
is anti Semitism and it's against the law,
even though that is repugnant to the constitution.
It which means it's null and void, Which
is, one of the many ways I show
you often that just because it's law does
not make it legal or constitutional.
You're you're that which means we're living under
an illegitimate entity that doesn't care about your
constitutional rights as the guiding principle of everything
we do. They don't care. They've ignored it.
Even though I swear oath to it. Right?
But the point is clear. You're going to
stop them from saying things because you deem
that illegal. Here's what Trump says.
100%.
I mean, the word it. If you're president,
will you send the DOJ to those campuses,
the office of civil rights from the Department
of Education to enforce the law?
100%. I mean, the 100%. Law is being
broken. 100 It's not, though. It's simply not.
Even in fact, legitimately not right now. I
mean, I I even that's a bad way
to frame it because I don't think it's
a legitimate law in the first place because
it's repugnant to the constitution. I mean, that
there's not even technically a law in place
that says you're not allowed to say something
anti semitic.
They love to try to make these cases.
They love to try to put
guidelines on platforms about hate speech, but it's
technically not. And even if they did pass
something, which should be outrageous to you as
an attack on constitutional rights being driven by
a foreign government,
that still would not be valid.
But he said a 100%.
You know, just like he will give them
land that's not theirs. Just like he will
allow them to move an embassy that has
no right to everything.
Everything.
Assassinate foreign leaders under a diplomatic guise.
That's that's what terrorism look like looks like.
Percent.
You wouldn't think you even have this. Did
you ever think 2 years ago, 3 years
ago that you'd you'd ever have this discussion?
No. It's unbelievable.
You know how dumb that is? Seeing as
how 2 3 years ago, they were screeching
about the same problem? So all they're doing
is Trump loves to do that. He loves
to be hyperbolic and make it seem like
we've never ever seen anything like this in
the history of anything he's talking about.
Yes. They were. Go back and look for
yourself. 3 hours before that, they were doing
the same thing. Screaming about antisemitism. You know
why? Because Israel was paying them to do
it. So So it's a lie, and they
both know that, but they go, yeah. Yeah.
Like, never I never would've thought. Even though
we had the same conversation 3 years ago.
Oh, it's happening. And when you see these
riots and you see a lot of people
too. Riots. You see my point?
Riots.
This is not what the black lives matter
conversation. Okay? Where you could easily show that
they were deliberately
misrepresenting what they well, in fact, it is
the same thing in reverse, where the left
would refuse to call them violent things. Here,
the I mean, there's been entire studies done.
There's been information coming from the highest levels
of power in instituting, whether it's the colleges,
whether it's international bodies, human rights groups. They're
showing you that these people have been lied
about.
They're proving to you. Or policemen in front
of congress going, there's no evidence of that
whatsoever. And yet Stefanik and the rest just
keep repeating it.
It's a it's a construct. Again, there is
racism, but what they put forward was a
blatant lie. And the and the reality was
even documented that 90 like, almost every time
I saw these that's not to say that
there weren't individual examples of violence, but they
were clearly acting nonviolent, getting hit, attacked, and
the moment there was a response of any
kind, even nonviolent, they would frame that as
an attack over and over and over and
over.
Now I guarantee people that don't want to
hear this will pretend like that's not the
case, but it's a verifiable fact.
But, you know, a lot of the people
in that a lot of those people are
Jewish people. You know that. They're Jewish kids.
Oh, yeah. There there are some outliers, but
but mo No. You see? He didn't like
that. See, Trump loves to play. I think
Trump just doesn't like, this guy, you're not
supposed to say that. You're not supposed to
admit that there were most of them were
Jewish. And that was easy to prove because
we're talking about the groups that were actually
driving most of this, which were Jewish voices
for peace.
What was the other one? I'll I'll have
it come up in a second.
I forget what major Jewish organizations that were
driving these protests. And we as we've shown
you many times, the examples of,
for example, a holocaust survivor.
Many of them. I mean, in fact, we
just shot we he just spoke out again
recently, but they have an entire group of
them wearing signs that they're there to stay
with the Palestinian people. And they want, you
know, there's outliers. No. No. It was led
by Jewish people. A holocaust survivor.
My message to the brave student protesters
in America is just keep doing it. Don't
give up. We are doing exactly the same,
and in the long term, we are going
to prevail.
There's a lot of these, guys. There's a
lot.
So what's funny to me is how they
want to deflect it as well. And so
the point that Trump pointing out they were
Jewish people is not supposed to make sense.
Because they want you to think it's unsafe
for Jews. Well, okay. Well, then why were
there per a a a vast majority of
Jews in this population? Whether it was Columbia
or anywhere else. And guys, this is a
provable fact as well. Like, you can look.
I just showed you one of the speeches.
You can watch them where they're literally standing
up. I mean, here, I'll do this.
Just out. Oops. Hit that wrong. Just one
more really quickly since I brought it up
and I'm going off on it. This this
is another example, and this I won't play
the whole thing,
but showing you, another student who's telling you,
look. I went and I sat down with
them. And, I mean, even Michael Tracy, for
example, keep going. He went to all of
them and were saying, I'm a Jewish person
and there's no problem. It's just it's embarrassing
how often they're lying about this stuff.
Go have some masa. Come have some matzo
ball soup. We're having a great time. We
got plenty plenty to go for everyone, and
we'll be out here having a really lovely
holiday.
Columbia University has been at the center of
pro Palestinian
protests for more than a week. Safety concerns
have been raised by Jewish students on campus.
But as Passover week begins, a group of
Jewish and non Jewish protesters have gathered at
the university to celebrate.
There is nowhere else I should be for
Passover besides here on campus.
You get where it goes. I mean, they
go on to explicitly state that there's no
danger here, that everyone's
they just just lied about it.
Afraid to outliers, but but mostly Jewish students
are afraid to That's the narrative, but it's
not true. Be over Continue on places like
Harvard and Penn. That are afraid. Yes. That's
true. And they should be afraid. I've never
thought I would Wait. Wait. See? These people
are McGrifters, man. They're lying to you. See
this in my life with the
the campus riots and and what they're saying
and what they're doing.
Yeah. What they're saying is explicitly
protected speech, and e and even and whether
whatever you think they're saying, on top of
that, they're saying things like, long live the
intifada.
Right? Which means revolution.
So are we gonna start calling the American
Revolution a terrorist act? I mean, what are
we gonna do here? These it's just they
they've lost the plot. That's what people are
starting to pay attention. And They have to
put them down quickly. They really have to
put them down. Oh, so put them down.
Right? So stop them. Like Josh Holly was
saying, you can't condemn this? How else do
you think they're gonna put this down?
I you guys know. Quickly. That needs federal
help. Like, collapse the department of justice.
They need a department of justice that will
prosecute these people that assault Jewish kids. See.
Because assault is
that that's real. That's not Yeah. Assault is
a crime. But I'd love to like, are
we talking about the time when that woman
got stabbed in the eye with a flag
even though that was a complete fabrication and
they got proven to do so? Or I
mean, what are we there's so many examples
of these false narratives.
Over and over and over, my point, long
winded, is the reality that they are absolutely
driving the idea that they need to stop
you from saying what they say is anti
semitism.
Even though we've proven that 90% of what
we're seeing out there, if not entirely, are
well, yeah, we'll make this point right now.
Here is The Guardian.
This is from 8 months ago. This again,
this is 8 months ago. Anti Defamation League
staff
decry, quote, dishonest campaign against Israel critics.
That's from the ADL staff.
Here
is this all Rod pointing out the New
Republic. Seems vital to mention in the post
that the it's the ADL's report whose director
compared the Palestinian kifa to a swastika.
The ADL admit officially has admitted, and this
is public information, that it counts pro Palestinian
activism as anti semitic anti semitic.
They've and they all agree with it. They
don't care. You have a flag? You're anti
semitic. That's not the truth though.
Anybody honest already knows this. And frankly, it's
obvious to see that it's the vast majority
of the world.
So here's an example of this. I'm not
familiar with this guy, but he seems to
be one of these mad, you know, people
screaming about anti semitism in every corner. Hundreds
of terror supporters,
otherwise known as people protesting to stop a
genocide, including Jews and Israelis, but, you know,
apparently, only Zionists,
you get the point, are the ones that
are on the right side. And it says,
walk out of class to intimidate the Jewish
student display. Oh, is that what it is?
Intimidate them with roses and Palestine and freedom
self determination and free Gaza, free speech? Terror
stuff, man. I mean, how do you even
how is this not being ridiculed everywhere?
Intimidate the Jewish students with a display of
peace?
It's it's it's sad.
And of course, it's only because of October
7th.
Well, yes. Obviously. Because that, whatever went down
this day, including the Hannibal directive or Hamas'
legal active arm resistance, and then crimes that
they committed after that, all started
now a multistage genocide.
It says every single faculty member that is
present should be immediately fired. These people are
caricatures.
And here, this person adds, it's like wearing
an SS armband
to protest the holocaust.
Again,
worthy of ridicule. Not only are they shockingly
uninformed and just straight I think willfully ignorant.
You're simply saying that somebody wearing a symbol
of Palestinian resistance
is a terrorist because you've identified it as
Nazis.
Even though Israel literally worked with the Nazis,
they're literally arming a Nazi group in Ukraine.
But, you know, let's forget all the facts
and highlight the fact that this person's screaming
for
rights, for equal rights and self determination
and lack of occupation and, you know, not
murdering children. Terrorists.
It's it's pathetic.
My point in all of this is to
show you that people like Trump and Kamala
are screaming about censoring you if you dare
to point any of this out.
So here's Jennifer
Jab however you pronounce that, Jab,
Jab
Lunovinsky.
Showing you the clip I just played, telling
you that we're gonna remove the Jew haters,
or Trump says this. And she says, well,
guess I'm not voting.
Which, you could take that however you want.
I think the reality is that people recognize
that means censorship of your rights.
Or censorship and violation of your rights.
And Ian Carroll says, yeah. Fucking hell, man.
Excuse me. Oops. I didn't mean to cuss
right there. Effing hell.
I mean, you know, whatever you think about
anybody,
I'm trying to show you that even people
not not even anyone in this conversation, just
people that are on the far right, far
left, everybody can sense there's a problem here.
I mean, the point really to make is
that there are conservatives that are going, woah.
Okay.
You know, there's no way you can kinda
wiggle out of this. Oh, you took him
out of context. You didn't mean that. Nope.
As he literally got introduced by Miriam Adelson
again. I guess, are we are we still
at the point where we're ask I mean,
look. Okay. When I first brought this up,
everybody was like, no. No. No. That was
a special thing for them. Okay.
Over and over and over, Trump is having
campaign rallies for Trump and Vance with Israel
flags behind him,
like right now.
Why is that normal?
You know it's not.
Be honest with yourself.
Be honest with people around you.
Call out people that are pretending this is
not a big deal.
K? He is literally standing there being introduced
by an Israeli
I mean, whatever you want, an oligarch. But
not I mean, he's not really even a
lobbyist. He's an individual private oligarch that is
funding his campaign, a stated purpose to allow
annexation of the West Bank, which is a
crime. Everybody knows that. So he he agreed,
just like Golan Heights was a crime. And
she introduces him yet again, over and over
with Israeli flags behind him.
I find that to be pretty crazy, and
it should be.
So my point is obviously, guys,
if you haven't picked it up yet, they're
both gonna be censoring you. They're both gonna
be doing so. They're both doing it now.
Moderation was the solution from Clinton. Moderation is
what they're doing now. If you can't connect
these dots, you don't want to. And I
think that people out there who probably would
connect the dots are just gonna, you know,
miraculously not just seem to see this show
or have this pop up in their feed,
which is usually how the other side of
this game works. But get it in front
of people that need to see it. Because
they're out there. Whether, you know, the algorithmic
gaining on Twitter and elsewhere, I've designed to
make sure that you stay in certain bubbles.
Put this in front of people. Click these
parts out, get it in front of people
that need to see it.
Now another couple points on this segment I
just think is interesting. This visual guide 24
account that's just lies,
constantly.
It's been caught lying in multiple categories
or discussions
since I've seen this existence
during obviously, ongoing throughout the genocide that they
keep getting caught lying for, but this was
the one that floated that claim that Elon
shared on in Venezuela.
And then it was proven to be false.
This is an Israeli propaganda entity. It's not
a news organization.
It's sad.
But here we are where they're promoting another
interestingly aligned idea that Israel's pushing. So this
is actually pretty funny. Iran's crown prince. This
is actually how they frame it.
Reza Pahlavi, who who by the way is
the son
of the of the of the puppet that
was put in place, the shah, by or
is the son or a relative, I I
think it's the son. Right? Is it anyway,
the
the the stand in puppet for the US
and Israeli
regime change apparatus.
Because
suddenly, they think that we're now what? Leaning
towards people wanting regime change in Iran? You
guys have lost the plot. The world is
clearly seeing what you're doing. Because you've got
a small segment of the US populations frothing
at the mouth to overthrow Iran again, does
not mean that this guy speaking on Twitter
is gonna change people's opinions. But he's standing
up going, and his important speech, they say,
he's ready to lead the transition to democracy
in Iran. They have it in the democratic
state right now despite the
screaming scree the screeches coming from partisan liars.
Now I limited if you will, if you
want. But if you pretend that we live
in a democracy, you're just as ridiculous.
So if you wanna call what we have
a democracy, you're damn right they live a
democracy. So let's pretend and again, we shouldn't
want either of those things. But here we
are where this guy standing up calling out
to people saying, we wanna change this, and
is that what Iranians are calling for? No.
This is the guy that connects to the
Shah who was a person put in power
by operation Ajax.
A illegal regime change of a foreign country,
though it's public acknowledge at this point, and
they removed the people in power. They put
the person in power that caused
devastation, destruction, and chaos for the average people.
But there's a really nice, you know, oligarch
circle where it was really nice to live
in Iran. You know, the Israelis in the
US and the and the Iranians that were
okay with giving up and selling out their
country. And that's what they show you. Right?
You look back, oh, look how great it
was in Iran. No. They're showing you just
like they would show you any other country
that they overthrow and destroy. You know, the
ones they want you to see. The point
is it's easy to prove.
The country was horrifying for people that were
actually not in line with the Israeli and
US agenda. Just like it was horror it
is horrible in Iraq and Afghanistan and Syria
for the people that are under the attacks
or the occupation
of the US government.
Bizarroj said,
he's gonna change everything. Kim says, LOL, a
prince from a monarchy,
wanting to bring forward democracy.
People buy this? Can you be more stupid?
So I I agree. It's just but I
think it's just desperation. I think they're making
moves because they know they're losing.
On the point of occupation, by the way,
whether it's Syria, Iraq, or anything else we're
talking about,
Richards simply points out, why does the western
mainstream media never mention the American occupied territories
in Syria? Well, I want you to think
about the idea of what they call terrorism.
First of all, let's recognize this is illegal,
no matter what.
Any but the
they're objectively illegal.
The US just has a narrative on why
they're there. They honestly don't ever go, like,
what it's you know, legally,
they just have a loophole. They argue with
their, you know, whatever it was, the,
Patriot Act or whatever the extension was, the
idea that or the War Powers Act. We're
going after the terrorists, and then just expand
that out to whatever they say. The truth
is that your loophole, even that does not
legally take away the reality that you're still
maintaining an illegal occupation of a foreign country.
They know that. They just don't care.
But, also, Turkey
and, also, Israel, as you well know, in
the Golan Heights. These are all illegal occupations.
They're They're all there illegally, and and the
US is just having a massive oil siphoning
operation they've been doing for a very long
time.
So why is that talked about? Why is
that not discussed? Well, you know why. But
what I wanna point out is that every
element of terrorism that we know exists in
this area, you know, just magically seems to
be in the places that are not controlled
by Syria.
It's very easy to prove. And of course,
they would just call
the Syrian government and the Syrian military terrorists
like they would about the Iranian military and
the Iranian government, even though it's not true.
But if you wanna easily highlight the terrorist
hotbed that even McGurk pointed out in Altamf,
that's obvious. Or how about the ID or
not not Altamf, it was,
it's been a while since we've got we've
talked about the Syria conversation. The the other
location we've talked about from Brett
McGurk. Actually, I might I might still have
it. Let me see if I got that
clip.
Let me see.
It's I wish that you guys remember the
oh, Idlib. There it is. Idlib.
So Idlib Idlib. I just saw the name
on a file. I didn't get the video.
But so in Idlib, we're talking about
that that it's I I mean, even Brett
McGurk said it's the largest hot spot ever.
Well, we now we now know for a
fact that Turkey
and the United States government are actively involved
with that conversation, in that location, and working
with terrorists. Or Altaf, Al Rupan camp, which
is basically a concentration camp or at least
it was. I mean, I where this is
this point, things could've changed, at a time
where they were holding Syrians.
And a growing hotbed of terrorism that was
I mean, this was covered by even corporate
mediants in abstract ways.
It's not in or Golan Heights where they've
proven to have given treatment to ISIS and
Al Qaeda.
So, you know, my point in always, as
we get into the larger conversation of Israel
and the starting with the Cosgrove clip of
just, we're done with the BS, guys. We
need to be done with the BS. We
need to be done playing games with liars
and grifters.
Acting like, well, they're have a lot of
standing and influence, like from just a Thoughts
article, so they must be trusting good people.
No, they're not. They likely have standing and
influence in a broken, corrupt system because they're
broken and corrupt. And lean into it.
That can't always be every. It's not, you
know, broad stroke everybody. But my my bottom
line point is that if we can look
at Afghanistan and see who they paid, worked
with, and and illegally occupied,
or in Syria, who we can say the
moderate rebels or what they you know, people
they found or who they armed or that
they're illegally occupying it, stealing oil. Or Iraq,
who continues to try to push them out
and they refuse and act they arm and
they give Israel fake passports to allow them
into the country, which we've talked about.
Or overthrowing of Libya, destroying the country when
it was clearly on the path to better
the people's lives there, the highest quality of
life in all of Africa, free education, free
health care. Oh, but a gold back dinar
and destroy it. Liberation.
Or overthrowing the Bosnia,
the, well, that too in the past, but
the,
Bolivia government.
For lithium and Elon Musk says, well, cool
whoever we want.
Yeah. Because they're the oligarch. They are the
machine.
Or on and on and on and overthrow
our camps in Venezuela or bombing in the
Sudan, both Trump and everybody else. Or, you
know, just on and on. Is that what
good guys do? At what point do we
recognize that they're not actually going after anything
but people that they funded or things that
they've stolen?
Hope that's clear.
So on this point, recognize that if you're
gonna look where the bad things are, it's
where they are.
Now lastly, Ryan Grim just pointed this out,
and we haven't gotten to this in-depth recently,
have in the past.
But, Moe, this guy says, history is being
made in Pakistan.
People have broken the shackles of fear. They
are defying corrupt generals. All congressmen, congressional aids,
and SCI experts need to update their softwares.
Stop ruling Pakistan through the likes of General
Asim Munar. Let democracy deliver.
So Ryan Grim makes an excellent point. So
right now, you're seeing this happen in Pakistan.
But ask yourself why you haven't heard about
this. Isn't it isn't it usually when there's
a a revolution or a protest for freedom
that the US jumps on? Well, no. In
fact, it's usually when they manufacture it. You
rarely see these things when they don't want
you to see them, when they're natural. You
see them when it's going, look at the
Azov movement fighting for freedom when they manufactured
it. Oh my god. Look at them fighting
for freedom. Assad shot protesters. No. He didn't.
They lied about it. We now prove that.
Not we being, like, international community.
As always, they want you to see it.
Look at Venezuela. They're fighting for freedom. No.
No. They're throwing cop Molotov cocktails on truckers
full of trucks full of barbed wire pretending
it's humanitarian aid. If you don't know what
I'm talking about, you probably haven't seen the
shows, but the point is that they lie
about it.
But then when there there's a real pushback,
you rarely see it. He says, one way
you can tell the CIA is not behind
the current protest in Pakistan is the total
absence of any coverage in the western press.
Typically, a pro democracy movement like this against
a military dictatorship is celebrated.
But in this case, the military is our
ally, so we don't talk about it.
Like we've seen everywhere. The coup in 2009,
Honduras, or, you know, literally everywhere else we
could talk about.
Just recognize this is who we're dealing with,
guys, and we can change it. Not by
voting in oligarch flavor 1 or oligarch flavor
2, but by finding something different,
by maybe standing up where it's needed.
Drop site points this out. Here's what Liam
Cosgrove said to Matt Miller.
Still poised to strike Iran. And in July,
Blinken said that Iran was 1 to 2
weeks away from developing a nuclear weapon. So
False. Proven false, by the way. I already
showed you the reality of the IAEA, even
the state department themselves.
They're not doing
that. Yes. They're increasing enrichment, but to this
day, they're still legally allowed to because of
the violation of the JCPOA that they've never
tried to rectify. They could. There's been a
lot of things proposed. They just don't because
they like the idea of pointing to that
and pretending, playing on your ignorance, that they're
somehow violating something. And that's even ignoring the
reality that every country in the world has
the legal right, it seems, to go after
nuclear weapons except Iran. Or North Korea, but
too late they did it, so now we
pretend it's not a problem even though now
they have, which continues to show you that
that's why they tried to in some cases
because that shows you a change in policy.
Iran has stated, religiously speaking, they will not
because it's against their religion.
Doesn't mean I would buy that at face
value. Maybe things have changed. Clearly, they're being
threatened. But the reality is that all of
the evidence, say, for politicians and
genocide committers,
genociders,
aside from
those kind of elements, everything else shows you
they are not and have not reached that
level or aren't even seeking to. Just make
sure you clear that.
That Iran was 1 to 2 weeks away
from developing a nuclear weapon. So I guess
for all we know, they might have one
by now. And meanwhile, in Ukraine Just to
be clear, he's making that point to set
the stage for his comment. Sorry. Just stop
it again. I'll let it play. But he's
just, you know, set the point that there
is a nuclear threat, at least by your
statements. So, therefore, what you're doing is dangerous.
That's what he's trying to get at. I
mean, they've struck deep within Russian territory several
times as deep as 300 miles from the
border. And in that case, we don't have
to guess. We know that Russia has the
largest nuclear arsenal on the planet as many
as 6000 warheads.
And so one of the risks of arming
militaries that are striking in the territories of
nuclear powers is that
one one of those gets deployed, and then
it could escalate very quickly from there. So
it's rarely discussed, but it's important to address
that the nuclear risk is real, and it
could very abruptly mean the end of, you
know, what humans have worked for 1000 of
years to collectively achieve. And,
us today are very lucky to live in
with the fruits of that achievement, and I
feel like we're treating the risk kind of
brazenly.
So my question for you is, you know,
we often hear in response to these concerns
that, well, Putin, Khomeini,
you know, they're war criminals, they're terrorists,
as if they're too inherently evil or immoral
for us to negotiate with. But, meanwhile, this
administration has financed a genocide
in Gaza for the last year, and every
day, you're up there denying accountability for it.
So, I mean, what gives you the right
to lecture other countries on their moral If
you have a Yeah. Before he comments,
you all know that that's a valid crusher.
They don't like the premise because it ultimately
highlights that you're that they're the problem. But
see, the question is very simple. But
moo removing the opening where he let's port
and lay it out. He's simply saying,
what gives you the right to lecture Iran
or anybody else when you are literally funding
a genocide? Like, that that is the valid
question. They will just have they there he
has no other action than pretending like it's
so outrageous I can't even engage.
But I think that in and of itself
is important. Now watch how he responds.
Today, you're up there denying accountability for it.
So I mean, what gives you the right
to lecture other countries on their moral So
if you have a policy question for me,
I'm happy to take it. If you wanna
give a speech No. But I need to
space places in Washington where you can give
a speech. Yeah. But people are are sick
of the bullshit in here. I mean, like,
it is a genocide. I'm a call I'm
a betting on another question. Are risking nuclear
war in Ukraine with this point of view.
Places to give a speech. Go ahead.
What a coward. On their moral So if
you have a policy policy question for me,
I'm happy to take it. If you wanna
give a speech No. But I need spaces
in Washington where you can give a speech.
Yeah. But people are are sick of the
bullshit in here. I mean, like, it is
a genocide. I'm a call you a buddy
on another question. Are risking nuclear war in
Ukraine with this place to place to place
to give a speech. Go ahead. Thank you,
Matt.
By the way, I love that last part,
which just shows you the rest of the
the go go along to get along
access journalism. Like, listen listen to the end.
Places give a speech. Go ahead. Thank you,
Matt. Thank you, Matt.
Right? Like so, everyone, like what they should
do is stand up in unison and be
like, answer his question. Right? We are the
ones controlling the conversation. You don't get to
dictate what we can ask and how. What
is the answer? But this guy Oh, thank
you, Matt. Now on to what you'd like
to talk about, Matt. That's like, we should
make fun of those people. You're a child
and you're well, I shouldn't say that because
who knows if he maybe he next jumped
into it. And my point is that we
do know in a general sense that peep
most people in that room, they they they
would rather maintain their position and their influence
than challenge what's going on. So they're not
journalists.
That's important.
But I think it's important to recognize like,
something I've said in the past by the
way, as obviously, I do I do agree,
I would or I would argue that there
is a level of decorum that is important
in any context just because I think that
bringing your down yourself down to a level
that is more childish or more,
what's the word I'm looking for?
I don't know. Just it they're I think
they're they're uncouth, if you will, the the
idea of holding decorum in certain positions is
important. But the reason I feel that that's
different, this is my opinion, as always, is
that what he's doing right there is is
using the an inflection of it to sort
of call this out. And then, you know,
and it ultimately falls back. I mean, I
think that's I think that is the best
way you could've done that. Because anything else
can get framed as, you know, trying to
be grand because what he did in despite
Matt's, like, almost that's the best point to
make is that Matt would have loved to
try to make that out to be some
kind of a bombastic move, like, you know,
you're grandstanding or you're doing this should you
get attention. You know and that's what I
already see people trying to frame it as.
You wanna support what's going on in Israel.
But he did it perfectly because he asked
a valid question. It was point it's point
blank,
and it it and he used the words
to inflict him to kinda
put an edge to it. And then and
then, you know, it was it was well
done. Simple as that. And I think what
this starts the conversation of is that there
are people out there that might not have
considered that.
That even those in this room are just
tired of it. We're tired of pretending to,
you know, looking you face to face while
you sit here and tell us things that
we all know are not true. Which by
the way is what they always do. But
we're dealing with the genocide right now. While
they're sitting there, they know children are starving
to death. While they're sitting there, according to
the doctors, the children are being shredded.
I think some of them are just not
okay with that. Thank god. We have some
human beings in there, ladies and gentlemen. It's
nice to see.
So let's talk about starting with this Robert's
recent article. So again, from here forward, we're
pretty much gonna go over some of the
things we talked about in the past, some
of which is new, some of which are
going over again. But we're gonna go over
some of these topics that I think just
go this is what we're talking about. We're
tired of the BS. Let's let's just stop
pretending,
which all of us are already pretty much
doing, but those out there might be new,
or you have somebody in your circles that
are hiding from this, let's stop pretending like
we don't know for a fact.
Everything we're gonna talk about next.
To start though, on the idea of how
they lie,
deliberately, both the US government for Israel or
any other context, but Israel explicitly today.
Rob Robert put this out today.
Debunking Israel's new campaign linking Hamas to ISIS,
again, trying to,
to justify annexation of the of the north
of of Gaza,
which I'll point out at the end,
seems to be ongoing.
And this is an important discussion. You might
have seen this circulating. Well, maybe not. Because
weird how it seems that other than, like,
the New York post and a few and
like the Jerusalem post and most western platforms,
like, really tried to ignore this. You know
why? Because it's easy to prove it's a
lie.
So what this is supposed to be is
a,
where the it's a let me forget me
to pronounce it crop properly.
A
Yazidi,
that's like the the background,
the, you know, where they're they're from, Yazidi,
a slave they're calling it, who is apparently,
they claim, held by ISIS,
and then moved to Gaza to Hamas. Like,
they're working together.
Now, what's interesting is you dive into this.
And I'm not gonna go through entirely, just
make sure you read it. That this according
to the data that came from even the
sources that they're citing.
And and and the groups that are working
with this, like so this there's a guy
who's an Israeli who's pretending that they carry
on a a secret mission to save this
woman.
Well, the the the Yazidi groups, the campaigns
are are speaking up and saying,
well, we don't like, basically calling him out
as a liar. Saying, we don't think you're
make doing anything. You're not rescuing the people
you're claiming to rescue. And they called him
out for it, and suddenly his website's being
deleted. And the GoFundMe is getting removed.
My point is when when you dig through
this, you find out that the guy is
in fact pretending to rescue zitty
individuals and taking in funds and not doing
that. And then it turns out this woman
was not taken, that she was a marry
she married somebody and then went on her
own accord. And all and, again, this is
all proven and and there there's actual statements
from Hamas, but that's not what we're using
to make this place case. It's actually cited
by Reuters, by the way. But either way,
we're talking about the factual basis from groups
in every dynamic of this, showing you this
woman was simply is essentially assisted by the
group that they're calling out, and that ultimately
it was by her own accord. And that
she simply came back. But on top of
that, that the guys, the the core lie,
that's even being called out by Western press
in some cases, of ISIS and Hamas,
is embarrassing.
They're ideologically
different and ISIS has declared Hamas an enemy
more than once.
They even provably removed them from these locations.
It's just crazy. All of this is to
say that it comes down to the idea
that they're just trying to patch together the
idea that ISIS is Hamas, which they're gonna
use to, he argues, to try to justify
the annexation of northern Gaza, which they currently
occupy, legally speaking, but they're actually going to
physically take it as they already have across
the middle. But it's an important discussion.
It it's it's worthy like, this gets into
the idea. Well, I mean, I again, I
probably should just go through this, but for
time, I chose not to to highlight it
and go through it because it's gonna take
a lot of time. But it's important for
you to read.
I was gonna try to find this one
part, but I I'll just come back to
it later. You make sure you read this
because the overall reality is that even like,
the only thing in this that got that
drives this lie is the Jerusalem Post,
and then the New York Post taking something
from that that's already been proven to be
false, by the way, and then just making
it ex exacerbating it.
And that's what they do.
Sad.
Another example,
Israel claims to have captured several Hezbollah strongholds
and tunnels in southern Lebanon, loaded with weapons,
we're told.
They showed an Israeli made machine gun and
a jeep, which I guess you could argue
they just stole. Right?
But which strangely has an inscription in Hebrew
that they forgot to remove, which suggests another
propaganda video. Yeah. But, yeah, you you could
argue they stole it somehow. Certainly possible. But
what's interesting is that these are the hallmarks
we continue to see. Where, oh, look. It's,
you know, things that they stole. What was
the the gun example where you find it?
Oh, it looks like that's the, no. That
wasn't it. The gun was the behind the
the
m r m I r MRI machine that
we have BBC catching them bringing in guns
after the fact. Like, just clumsy, terrible stuff
or,
terror calendar or teller terror fan. But there
is the example where they were they they
kept I think it was a what was
that?
Remind remind me in the chat. There was
there's so many of them, it just blends
together. But where they made a video like
this and then somebody caught in it, oh,
that's right. It was the the the the
they they said there was a computer, except
there was Hebrew keys on the computer. Or
there's thing like, things like that. They just
keep getting caught lying. But this is just
another example of them pretending. And right now
in Lebanon, which we're gonna get to, it
is overwhelming
how they're just
It's just whole cloth. Just the whole narrative.
Just dumping it over Lebanon. Despite the fact
that it doesn't even line up. Now, I
mean, any not everything for that matter, we
know they're lying about. But many examples of
this, you you just can't translate from Gaza
to Lebanon. And they're doing it anyway. It's
it's pretty horrifying what's going on. Before we
get there, I wanna show you some things
like this that connect with the same conversation.
Here's this is the same guy, by the
way, who seems to be getting more and
more prominent, at least in my feed, which
I don't this is what's funny to me.
I don't follow this guy. I don't engage
with his content. But all of a sudden,
I start seeing him every day on my
this is what Twitter is doing. Either way,
breaking. Masked Hamas members, which I don't know
how in the world you think you know
that they're Hamas or what they he's just
using it to say what he wants you
to think about it. Beat a Palestinian man
in front of his children.
So it's really, it's just this random video
of 3 guys beating a guy, and you
can't see what's going on. Like everything else.
It says, for all those people calling themselves
pro Palestinian
and waving a flag, this is the way
you should work. How do you even make
such a clumsy argument? So let's just even
say that they are Hamas members. Palestinian flag
is not Hamas. Secondarily,
even if it was, 3 people doing this
in one example means everyone does that? Like,
this is the kind of
baseless fact fact free arguments you keep getting.
And just broad stroke hype hype, you know,
assumption.
It's just so sad that we can see
how clearly I just this is why I
came to think that there's only people that
are invested in this that are still going
along with this stuff. And then you get
like the same kind of engagement on all
these things. But here's the point.
Remember this?
Which again has been this this is an
older video. It's verifiable.
The these are
IDF members
kidnapping a child that's clearly Palestinian and using
it as a human shield.
This is an old source, very easy to
prove.
So, do you notice a similarity there? Or
is that just me?
What I'm gonna point out here Now again,
who knows? You could argue these are Hamas.
My point is, we don't know. I can't
definitively tell you who's under those masks. Because
I'm not stupid like these people. But what
I can tell you is what you'll notice
in any context, and also look at their
color of their skin, you know, kind of
a good indication on top of that. But
either way,
Hamas
dresses very deliberately.
For a reason. But they also dress in,
you know,
civilian guard when they wanna blend in, like
any,
you know, gorilla type concept.
But what I tend to never see in
well, most cases are that kind of clothing.
Now the mask you'll see, but it usually
goes along with something else. Because the mask
calls out that there's something. Right? When they're
so there are there typically in my experience
in, like, gorilla blending up with civilians or
there are Hamas uniforms.
So this is a mixed ground there, where
you get the mask where you can say,
see, Hamas, but not so they're showing that
they're Hamas by wearing a mask, but not
weird they're not wearing the uniform. Not guaranteed.
There's examples in the middle. But what you'll
notice is anytime you do see IDF going
in under operations, you'll see them dressing like
this when they're not trying to show themselves.
And this is very easy to prove. So
it's pretty hard to miss that overlap. It's
like the Patriot front and FBI. But on
top of that, I should've actually grabbed this
earlier.
See what pops up.
There's plenty of examples.
Well, we we even just saw the idea
of raiding the hospital dressed like Palestinian civilians.
We saw them do that after the pier
where they raided another place dressed like Palestinian
civilians.
Yeah. This right here shows idea of, parading
scores of Palestinian men around. That's the human
shield aspect. But you can see many examples
throughout the past of them dressing up like
Hamas. Let me just do that.
I'm it may not pop up right now,
but this is this we've talked about this
many times.
And then using that to infiltrate, which is
what they just did. So all I'm saying
is think about how obvious it is to
just dump these videos out when I think
the evidence is pretty clearly in the opposite.
But this is how it works. Now the
exam the example we just showed you, to
start this off,
was obviously an example of using a human
shield, which is a classic classically old pro
IDF has a procedure called the neighbor procedure,
which you guys well know. That is a
human shield procedure. It's been called up by
human rights groups, and even before that, it
was more explicitly
Human Shield dynamic, and they were told to
stop it. So they said, okay. We are.
We will stop it. And they instituted the
neighbor procedure, which was then simply called Human
Shield as well. So Zachary Foster, who has
a PhD in Palestinian history from Princeton,
breaks down a very excellent thread, showing you
all the many different examples going back before
and post October 7th, a brief history of
Israel's use of human shields.
I'll include this article I did, the open
secret of Israel's use of human shields, where
you can see one blatant example right there,
which before October 7th.
Dan Cohen says Israel's command and control centers
are located in densely populated cities where its
residents are used as human shields. Yet Iran
managed to strike those centers without killing a
single Israeli soldier or civilian human shield.
Think about that. Meanwhile, which is even Israel
has claimed it. 0.
Meanwhile, Israel Israel lies and claims Hamas command
and control centers are under hospitals, inside schools,
shelters, IEP camps, then calls the civilians' human
shield and drops 1,000 of bombs on them
without ever proving the actual shield dynamic or
the tunnel. Israel is genocidal
regime is that deceives at every turn. And
Iran is intervening to put an end to
this crimes against humanity. I agree with that.
That doesn't mean good guy.
Iran has plenty of problems we could point
out, but I think that's a fundamental,
objective reality of what's happening right now.
Now, here
we're gonna get into some harracks articles, but
I guess I'll play this really quickly since
we're talking about it.
2013,
Palestinian children tortured,
used as shields by Israel, per the United
Nations.
Reuters.
Israeli soldiers who used Palestinian boy, a 9
year old as human shield avoid jail.
Defense for Children International, an international human rights
group. Israel forces use 5 Palestinian children as
human shields. That's 2023.
2 this is from 2017. Generally, human shields.
Since the beginning of the occupation in 1967,
Israeli security forces have repeatedly
used Palestinians in the West Bank and the
Gaza Strip as human shields. Israeli soldiers
routinely used Palestinian civilians as human shields by
forcing them to carry out life threatening tasks.
It was also following a high court petition
against this practice,
which was filed by human rights organizations around
the world in May 2002 that the IDF
issued a general order
prohibiting the use of Palestinians as a means
of human shield against gunfire or attacks by
the Palestinian side. But then it goes on
to say, following the order, the use of
human shields dropped sharply.
However, the arms of the army did not
construe as a human shield the use of
Palestinians,
provided they consented.
The army continued the widespread use of this
practice, which they referred to as the neighbor
procedure.
Following another petition filed by human rights organizations,
the high court of justice ruled that this
practice too violated international humanitarian law and that
this, thus, was illegal. And guess what they've
never stopped doing? Here is the Institute For
Middle East Understanding, the neighbor procedure, Israel's use
of Palestinian human shields from 2,012. Human Rights
Watch. During military operations, Israeli soldiers routinely coerced
Palestinian civilians, including children, to perform life endangering
acts that assisted military operations, the practice known
as the neighbor procedure.
Right. Exactly what we've seen, what,
9 8 several times since October 7th? Like,
flagrant, even called out by the Guardian and
others where they tied the guy to the
truck and he bur it literally melted his
skin on the truck, and then they killed
him later, by the way, if you don't
remember that story. They shot him later. That's
what they do.
Well, here here is so this is my
point to the the the Liam Cosgrove point.
It's we're done with the BS. And it's
infuriating to pretend that these maniacs who are
either willfully ignorant or actually ignorant or pro
Zionist
are hiding this. This is from Heretz. I
mean, all of these except one from The
Guardian. And, again, realize that there are so
many more from Amnesty, from Human Rights Watch,
from Beth Selim, many of which I just
showed you in that clip. But I I
thought it was important to show you directly
from Israeli media. And these are just some.
I mean, I I had to stop because
I just like, there's so many I could've
pulled up. Here's Haaretz from 2012.
Does the presence of IDF's headquarters in Tel
Aviv even dangerous city's population? Just to overlap
with what Dan said. The answer is yes.
Everyone seemed to agree with that.
Here, Haret this is the most recent one.
This is from this is from August of
this year.
This is a big one. Haret's investigation.
Israeli Israeli army uses Palestinian civilians
to inspect potentially booby trapped tunnels in Gaza.
That is the actual definition of human shields.
But it goes back from there. This one's
2024. Oh, this is the same same August
2024. Israel's use of human shields on the
battlefield is a war crime.
That's Haaretz from this year.
Israeli media.
Here, this one goes back to, again, so
I thought this one further back. This is
from July 2024.
Israeli soldiers filmed using detainees in Gaza as
human shields.
From the leading Israeli newspaper.
Here's The Guardian
from August as well. Israeli forces in Gaza
use civilians as human shields
against possible booby traps. That's the larger one
we pointed out. This is from 2,013. Again,
there again, it there's so many. Like, it
looks like it's the earliest ones I was
grabbing. UN Palestinian children tortured,
used as human shields by Israel.
Now
if they happen to get away
after being kidnapped or used as human shields
while they're kidnapped,
here's what you find.
People like this, who are taken, who are
healthy, come back like that.
This is what we're dealing with right now.
And we know we see this. Anybody honest
with themselves have seen far too many provable
examples to pretend this is not real.
So let's talk about claims like the rapist
regime. Right? Or the idea of a go
you know, the outrage about how they have
a British citizen or an American citizen or
the lies around it. But the rapist regime,
one of the most
provable,
provably debunked lies around this entire thing. Here's
Elon Levy from October 5th
saying, the Hamas rapist regime, which, again, we
should all laugh about how stupid it is
that he keeps saying that stupid thing even
if it was real, but then a real
and realizing that they've been proven 45 times
over even by Israeli media, by the United
Nations, by human rights groups, that that's not
what happened.
He says the Hamas' rape regime is still
holding a British citizen. Oh, it is.
I guess you don't care about the ones
Israel have killed. Funny how that only works
one way. We'll come to that. He says,
what is the UK government doing about it?
We think about how selective the outrage is.
Okay. Well, let's talk about the rapist regime.
You might find this horrifying,
if not fascinating.
And let's realize again,
a brief, brief selection of things that go
back decades.
This one actually kinda blew my mind. I
this because I've seen these about, like, the
I think it was, like, 1 at one
point, it was 1 in 4 of people
women in the IDF were sexually assaulted.
Then and then they made a big report
about it. Right? A few years later a
few years later, it was 1 in 2.
Not making that up. I've already covered it
on the show. So showing you that they
reported it and it only got worse.
And you can read into that however you
want.
Jerusalem Post,
2021. I just can't even believe this. Number
100%
of foreign agriculture workers were sexually assaulted.
Experts say, in Israel.
100%. Like, same point that making anything. I
find it impossible to believe that it was
actually 100%. Like, I mean, I shouldn't say
that, I'm sure it is possible. But from
any context, that should
that's usually,
like, for instance, if it was, like, okay.
Right. So 5 654
of them.
Far more likely that a number that that,
like, that kind of thing is that they
could all have been sexually assaulted. But, like,
if you take a big thing of, like,
this all this country, 100%. I find it
very difficult to believe that's possible.
Or that, you know, mathematically speaking or anything.
A 100%. It's very rarely the case.
But it says a 100%.
Out of 654
Thai foreign workers,
all of them said they had been exposed
to sexual assault.
What do you think that shows you
about
what this society is allowing
as long as you're not in their society?
Now I'm talking about Zionists. Looks like Gilligan
right there.
Realize that there
are Orthodox Jews in this country that speak
out against all of this stuff,
or in other countries.
My point is simply to show you that
they're and they and they get beat up
in Israel. It's about Zionists and the Zionist
mentality of what they're willing to allow as
long as you are outside of their selected
group.
That is racism. That is supremacism.
That is a problem.
These things were fresh twice since we've added
up.
Like, they're always changing stuff on these. But
the point is that this shows you what
they're allowing a 100% means that they're raping
or assaulting sexually
every ape every worker, every one of them
because they know they can get away with
it. Because they don't think these people are
the same. Ask
Ethiopian Jews how they're treated. They'll tell you
as second class citizens.
It's about Zionism and they're racist.
Here is one from 2024, August 5th. By
legitimizing
rape,
Israeli is I keep doing that. Israeli society
takes one step further towards moral decay.
For the podcast,
that's Herets.
The leading Israeli newspaper writing about how Israelis
are
legitimizing
rape and stepping towards moral decay.
Yeah. We all see that.
This this is actually one of the examples
we're gonna come to, this guy. This is
the guy who was raped.
They they the one we've all talked about.
Next one, Haaretz as well. This one from
September 11th.
Israel's rife with rape apologists,
and they're getting louder.
Haaretz.
Israeli media writing about Israeli society, and yet
we get called racist for pointing out what
they're saying.
The squirrel point this out. It's a thread.
You can read it for yourself. It goes
on about a lot of things, and I'll
actually play that clip we played in the
past as well because it works perfectly right
here. He says a Palestinian civilian
raped by female Israeli guards has been direct,
direct testimony that children are oh, actually, I
take it back. I've read I saw this
in Broad in Line, and I thought he
was referencing the guy that this guy right
here. This this story.
If you wanna have trouble sleeping tonight,
read this report.
Literally called Welcome to Hell
by B'Tselem. I'll actually include that report so
you don't miss it.
B'Tselem. The the the one of the leading
human rights groups in the world, and it
is an Israeli human rights group called Welcome
to Hell. The Israeli prison system has a
network of torture camps. Rape being a primary
discussion in this article.
Because this just came after what happened.
This is crazy to me that we pretend
this might we're done with the BS, guys.
We're done pretending like people trying to tell
you you're wrong, who don't wanna look at
it, are even worth considering anymore.
This is a guy who was raped, who
is telling you that children are also being
raped in their dungeons or their prisons. Mass
raped is what he says. He says general
mutilation and torture is routine, which by the
way is a whole section about that in
this report.
He says, and Israeli doctors are joining in
on on the torture. Now this is coming
from his statements. Clearly, he has every reason
in the world to
make you know, to to go after them
because he was raped. So, I mean, he
could be embellishing for all we know. But
the point is we know this is happening.
And he goes on to show you many
examples.
Here is a member of the state department
who resigned because he tried to expose the
rape of a child. And what did Israel
do?
They shut down the location and accused them
of being terrorists.
Let that reflect on what they call terrorists
today.
We have to condemn the atrocities that happen
every day to Palestinians in the West Bank.
You mentioned sexual violence.
I was part of the human rights vetting
process for arms going to Israel,
and a charity called Defense of Children International
Palestine,
drew our attention at the state department to
the sexual assault. Actually, the rape of a
13 year old boy that occurred in an
Israeli prison in the Muscabia in Jerusalem.
We examined these allegations.
We believe they were credible.
We put them to Israel to, the government
of Israel. And you know what happened the
next day?
The IDF went into the DCIP offices and
removed all their computers and declared them a
terrorist entity.
I think it is vital that atrocities not
happen to anyone, not sexual violations,
not any kind of gross violation of human
rights. We are looking at a situation where
there is so much
dehumidification
where people are not seen.
Exactly.
I was gonna grab this real quick. Since
somebody in the chat
asked just fully mentioned it.
Oh, it's open secret.
Because the truth is this stuff is an
open secret. Like, it's it's in that that's
the whole point of this whole segment. It
is it's embarrassingly
obvious. The evidence goes back decades, and yet
we pretend like we're not sure.
It was about the idea of organ trafficking,
which, again, it goes back it goes it's
a worldwide dynamic. And and then that's specifically
just Israelis,
but the reality being of the Israeli government
being explicitly involved just as October 7th has
been proven at least 3 times now by
human rights groups, guys. Catching them doing it
with bodies they steal. It's crazy.
The open secret of Palestinian organ theft.
But to the continuing this segment, here's one
we just got we brought, this is one
of the shows from July of this year
with which the segment being Israeli soldiers arrested
for gang rape protected by leadership, which we've
already seen. That was the welcome to hell
discussion. This one from Robert from March 29th.
Israel's
October 7th rape propaganda has encouraged sexual violence
against Palestinian women. A 100%.
It's our it's been that was been backed
up by human rights groups.
Now here's Elon Levy again. Same tweet. The
Abbas rapist regime. How does that feel now?
Despite and on top of that, if you
actually pay attention, the reality of everything they've
pointed to as the squirrel's broken down, the
New York Times, the the in in as
he calls it, the the rape apologist hoax,
I think.
It's imploded. They've been admitted that that was
false. They got caught. Or the ZOC information
that's been proven by Harrettes.
Or the UN,
Pamela Patton conversation where she herself
actually, I'll I think I can grab that.
Has spoken about this and said it was
not.
Think it's right here.
Yeah. The UN representative, Pamela Patton, who who
prepared the report on alleged sexual violence on
October 7th, in this clip, despite them misrepresenting
it, admits that the report is not an
investigation
and that it contains unfounded and outright false
testimonies
from Israeli entities.
Now she says, it's not an investigation. We
were not even trying to allot blame. We
were collecting data points and organizing that for
later. We were not deciding who was guilty.
We were not and in fact, she said
we found many examples of them lying about
stuff. And even this woman I think about
was referencing the New York Times and saying
that they they exactly what it was, a
false narrative.
And yet here he is,
just going along with the rapist regime narrative
while Israeli
government and military are rap are be are
being exposed by their own human rights groups
for raping people in prison.
God only knows what's happening in Gaza.
But let's go to the other part of
this this embarrassingly
childish liar. Holding a British citizen hostage.
Okay.
Interesting how you only care about the Israeli
hostage, a British Israeli entity who's being held
by everyone's accounts without being harmed, being fed,
being brought shopping, being allowed to play games.
But meanwhile, you're starving to death, raping, and
torturing people in your prisons. Just to make
sure we understand the difference.
Well, oh, this one's, what I just brought
up.
What about the British workers that were killed
by your airstrikes?
Oh, I see why you don't wanna bring
those up, Elon. I get it. You're you're
disgusting. Okay. How about the oh, just to
point out on top of that, that the
families of one of the WCK workers
is now this is as of this is
September. That's last month.
Well after the fact,
they're calling for an independent investigation. You know
why? Because despite what Matt Miller screeches about,
they have never followed up. They have never
actually investigated. They just the day later, they
said, we're done. We didn't do it. It
was an accident. And Matt Miller continues to
pretend like we're gonna follow-up in his investigation.
No. Their own families are going, screw that.
You guys are doing nothing. We demand an
investigation, which probably will never happen.
But Elon Levy wants to know why you
haven't released this what about these people, guy?
What about the people that you just murdered?
What about
Manchester student says 15 relatives of hers have
died in Gaza. We don't care about those
British people.
Obviously, we know what's going on here. Guys,
they're hypocrites.
They're desperately deflecting to anything they can to
outrage people. They might just catch in a
moment where they don't know what else is
going on. If you look
barely into this conversation, even at corporate media
information,
you will see they're lying to you.
Like I said the 1st week of this,
they have lost. They have already lost the
information war. It's over. So all this is
about right now is trying to manage some
next step that doesn't completely destroy what they
are and what they want have going for
them. And I'm I'm talking about Zionism.
We need to actually dismantle this thing as
opposed to let it creep forward and reestablish
itself.
Now, this is gonna get into
the conversation of atrocities in general. And I
think we talked about this over, like, Bosnia,
Rwanda, or almost any genocide you can think
of, you can prove. And I don't mean
this by hyperbolic statements like Eloh Levir. I
mean, prove
by their own statements, by UN documents, that
they were Israel's government was involved. I too
thought that one. I was like, that's pretty
crazy. Guess what? It's real. And I talked
about this with Rwanda when I did my
own deep dive, and I was blown away
by how obvious this was. We're done with
the BS.
Oh, we're on a military base or something.
Okay. That's an Israeli rifle, so we have
to be here in
Israel.
What?
Why are there Israeli weapons in the middle
of South Sudan?
Despite UN sanctions on arm sales, Israel continuously
sold advanced weapons to South Sudan during its
brutal civil war that claimed over 400,000
lives, 10% of whom were children.
Israeli arms like the ace assault rifle have
been documented in the hands of various factions
throughout the country. These weapons have been linked
to serious human rights violations including attacks on
civilians, and ethnic massacres.
After South Sudan gained independence in 2011,
Israel quickly established diplomatic relations by recognizing it
as an independent state. According to Assad chief,
Zavismir,
Israel wanted to prevent Sudanese military units from
integrating with Egyptian forces on the border of
Israel by keeping Sudan's army occupied.
Additionally, they wanted to strengthen operative ties with
Kenya and Ethiopia,
and extend aid to a nation fighting for
its independence
and liberation from Islamic tyranny. However, the continued
supply of arms during an active conflict has
only accelerated the devastation experienced by millions of
families leading to countless condemnation
by local and international humanitarian
organizations.
Right. Damn it. Missed it.
As well as child soldiers and illegal mining,
you know, the the same old same old
from all of these people. We realize it's,
it's the obvious nature of the oh, and
by the way, this is,
the guy who was doing this Eric Hovigim.
I'm not familiar, but I like this. I
just followed him because I like that video.
We'll see what else comes out of it.
Funny. I'm saying I say that in the
I do that often where I I don't
like investigate. I I see somebody that gets
something I like or I'm interested or like
their view take, I usually just follow and
then wait to see more of it and
then unfollow if I think, you know, it's
it's usually just a rapid thing. But I
I I think that's a good practice because
you can always dig through someone's feed and
be like, oh, you know, I don't like
that or, oh, he's this side and, you
know, it's it's just about information, you know.
And it's important to think about people, you
know, can get through sometimes. Anyway, the point
is, here he is if you wanna follow
him. He's talking about the Sudan.
Now I was referencing a lot of things,
Bosnia and Rwanda, which I'll talk about briefly
next. But what's important to highlight here is
that this could just be about profiteering,
but I think it's much more than that.
I think it's about seeding the
narrative
as all as well as the destabilization that
benefits your agenda. Now what they say there,
the the framing it as fighting the the
Islamic terrorists. That's always how this works. It's
not the accuracy, but it's not the reality
of what's going on.
And remember,
you you drive them into this position and
then go, yeah. As long as you just
normalize with Israel, that's all. Then who cares?
Right? So what? You wanna tell us that
you're trying to fight Islamic terror, but if
the government normalizes with you, we'll just stop
caring about that?
The point is, either there was never any
issue, like I say every time,
or they're okay with terrorism as long as
you normalize with Israel.
There's only one 2 ways to look at
that. And either way, it shows you we're
dealing with a dishonest, genocidal
maniac.
Now the point is that if you wanna
go through this episode, it will blow your
mind. Because this is not my opinion. This
is not coming from anything other than
the solid
source material.
Whether whatever you know, whether we're talking about
documented evidence from the actual event or people
that were covering this after the fact as
reporters or the UN conversation or human rights
groups or Israeli entities bragging about it, giving
them uzis and weapons or the on the
record conversation of Israeli entities
trying to convince the,
the one of the elements of the Rwanda
genocide to ultimately lean into the idea that
the other side was their problem. And they're
and saying, well, just like our problem with
the Palestinians, we understand where you're coming from.
We gotta help each other get rid of
them. Like, that kind of stuff driving this.
Arming from before, during, and after
the ongoing the the the war on the
genocide.
Look up Bosnia. Look up any number of
these things. You will find them at least
profiting from the terror.
You cannot ignore this stuff anymore.
Now here is a boot a Bernese
genocide scholar
telling you the reality of Israel.
It's not just single acts, but if you
have to look at them,
look different policies and practices of Israel
as being interconnected
with this singular
purpose of taking the land with our people.
It has everything.
All the elements of historical crimes that we
witness in, you know, settler, colonial genocides across
North America, Latin America, Australia,
right, South you know, and Africa.
Everything is there, man. Israel is the embodiment
of all elements of crimes with the exception
of slave trade and slavery.
Yeah?
Yeah. Except we can make a case for
that too, but we'll leave that for another
show.
That we have witnessed
the Christian Europe committed over the last 500
years against the people of color around the
world. Israel
is the worst form of, you know, genocidal
regime. That's why I but, you know, professor
Noam Chomsky,
who used to live here in his youth
in the 19 fifties in Kibbutz. Right?
He just he finally said Israel is the
most vicious type of settler colonialism.
Everything
that is wrong with the human civilization,
Israel has mastered in institutionalizing.
Tell us about the actual interactions that you
had with Palestinians and Israelis.
So you spent time in East Jerusalem and
the West Bank. Were you able to meet
with Palestinians? And if so, what was their,
feelings and attitudes towards the situation that we're
seeing? Yeah. I mean, I I had, like,
you know,
talked to
different Palestinians
from a cross section of the Palestinian society.
Right? Like, kids in refugee camps, you know,
the,
the shop owners,
university students, NGO activists, you know, faith leaders,
you know, from Lutheran Church, other Christian denominations.
And also, we also I also talk to
the, we visit Al Aqsa
mosque and, you know, talk to the, talk
to the, the the the prayers there if,
you know
in West Bank, what strikes me is that
although West Bank is nominally under the Palestinian
Authority Administration,
you
know, the the the the common view is
that Palestinian authorities
are, at best, completely
impotent,
you know, to protect the Palestinian population. They're,
at best. And at worst,
Palestinian authorities
is really,
you know, serving as a local controller
of
Palestinian people, their own people
for Israel.
I don't make these words up. That's like,
you know, when you sit down and, you
know, chat with them, the locals say, Palestinian
authorities controlling us for Israel. That's rather demi.
And then, you know, and then someone even
said,
oh, we are under double occupation.
I mean, that, you know, that I was
shocked, you know. And and what we're looking
at is like, you know, basically like a
Nazi Germany like situation.
Right? Because like people, the the Western media
and, you know, all the politicians and, you
know, the the Israeli people,
they're blaming everything on Netanyahu.
But Netanyahu
is,
you know, riding the beast
of
a thoroughly
Zionized
or Zionist
society,
the way Israeli talked about.
I actually do think that term is much
better.
Zionized because it implies that you've something's been
done to you as opposed to just people
that have adopted a belief structure. I really
believe that. I mean, I think this is
an aggressive kind of mental it it it
it's a cult, guys. I mean, I we
need to recognize that the people aren't born
with genocidal intent or dehumanizing
perspective. These are gift just like US government
does the same thing. But I just wanna
make sure I I think that's an important
distinction whether just being a Zionist entity or
a Zionist entity. I'm gonna I'm gonna use
that.
Palestinian. You know, I had I struck up
conversation with fellow passengers in Tel Aviv on
a sham on a tram or buses, and
they would say, Palestinian people, oh, you know,
they're miserable people. They're in deep poverty.
You know, they're
they're not the problem, but it's their leaders.
And then it turned off. That's a standard
narrative that Israel
has circulated. Right? Like, okay, that that don't
say anything racist about the Palestinian. Just focus
on the organizations and politicians. Right? But but
but they don't talk about 810 kilometer long,
wall
that has
massively impoverished and dispoverted,
and also let settlements. Right? Like,
the displacement,
the use of terror. Right? None of this
is no. As insofar as the Israelis'
public opinion
is concerned, you know,
from my reading, my limited interaction,
Israeli public feels they are moral.
And I did one woman used the term,
moral code. Well, Netanyahu had broken the moral
code. I was like, well, like, what kind
of moral code Netanyahu broke? I was like,
well, he needed to save the, you know,
hostages,
rescue them, or, like, you know, we don't
leave in our Jewish or Israeli Jewish society.
We don't leave our people in
distress or in need or at risk
alone. We have to do it. So so
but but their sense of moral obligation
does not extend
to any Palestinian
that they have terrorized for the last 75
years.
Now I'm gonna leave it there. There's about
5 more minutes left. It's a great clip.
But what's important to hear there is the
point many of us are trying to honestly
make as much as it's very uncomfortable.
And I and again, that's why I make
that point. I think this has been done
to these people but it's not to give
any kind of a pass. There's accountability here.
These are individual choices. But my point is
that, like he's saying, that, you know, there's
a line to be shown there where, yes,
there's an alignment
of us all going, yes, this needs to
stop. Yes, there needs to be a ceasefire
and take whatever deal Hamas offers. But, clearly,
their their their line that's crossed is the
fact that they have left their own people
to die, which I think all of us
would be outraged about. You're if any of
you, you know, like I'm showing right now
about how your government's not caring about Israel's
killing Americans. Or how mister Elon Levy, who
is British,
he was it's funny how the the
the way that they frame this whole situation.
But you don't care about them killing British
people.
Why is that? Right? It's it's just so
much gross hypocrisy. But what he's saying there
is that they are outraged about it insofar
as that it's their people being hurt, but
they don't seem to care about Palestinians. Not
all. Not all. There's a there's a large
group of people in this country that do,
but it's it's a it's a it's a
minority for sure.
So going forward on this segment,
Mohammed Shehadam made a great point about somebody.
I brief briefly pointed this out. But this
is, Avache,
Baron
who ran an article calling to build, quote,
extermination camps for, quote, Amalek.
Netanyahu made this guy a Likud minister
or Likud, Knesset member.
This is 12 years before October 7th, he
says this. 12 years before October 7th. So
keep telling me it's all because of that
day. Extermination
camps for Amalek, the same term he then
uses to call Palestinians Amalek after October 7th.
It's just so obvious.
Israel's genocide in Gaza is one of the
most premeditated,
well documented in modern history.
There's his article.
Done pretending, guys.
Now, you might have seen this, Julian Assange
spoke up. Yeah. It's been it's been quiet
since he got released, but he finally spoke
up and guess what? It's about Gaza, it's
about Israel.
I think there's a reason for that.
He mentions the idea of the ass of
the assassinations,
but he importantly ties it to one of
what I get, and what I think is
one of the most important building blocks of
where this goes. Not the immediacy of the
genocide, which I think is worldwide the most
important thing, but then just because it's human
life and because from an American perspective, they're
using our money, our tax dollars, the weapons
that we are they're you are responsible, Americans.
Whether you like it or not, your government
has made you responsible. So you have to
care about that. Now in the sense, well,
you know, as always, you can choose to
not care about anything. But to be objective
about the what we're discussing,
it should be important to everybody is how
I should frame that. But my point is
that he connects it with the idea of
where it's going. The idea of the artificial
intelligence
being used to assassinate people in real time,
basically live streamed.
That's pretty terrifying. They are normalizing this.
From prison. I see that artificial intelligence,
is being used
to create
mass assassinations,
where before there was Otherwise known as genocide
in Gaza.
The difference between assassination and warfare,
now the 2 are conjoined,
where many, perhaps the majority of targets, in
Gaza
are bombed as a result,
of artificial intelligence targeting.
The connection between
artificial intelligence and surveillance,
is
important.
Artificial intelligence needs information
to
come up with targets or
ideas or propaganda. When we're talking
about
the use of artificial intelligence to conduct mass
assassinations,
Surveillance data from telephones,
Internet,
is key to training those algorithms.
They're using you is the point, guys.
Just like just like Israel as always. Right?
What's that there there have been documentaries made
about this. Battle tested.
Literally, net Israel, not even not even secret,
will use experimental
as well as just new weapons in Gaza
and then sell them at conventions as battle
tested.
That's how grotesque this all is. And right
now, they're using this to to basically train
I mean, you could make a valid argument
that the only reason this is happening
is to from from a Israeli perspective, why
they might have engineered this to and and
from or from a globalist perspective
to officially
fine tune
what's coming next.
I don't think that's the case. I think
there's a lot more going on, but that's
a very alarming thing to see because that
is happening. As he's telling you, but just
because I think it's easy to prove. They're
they are working out the bugs or rather
just testing officially the AI assassination program. And
if you and as it says here in
the tweet, the US, UK, EU armed Israel
has made the concept of an AI dystopia
into a reality, where human life is destroyed
on a genocidal scale using AI.
And even as they report these in 7972
magazine,
a mass assassination factory
inside Israel's calculated bombing of Gaza. They make
it clear. They're just bombing buildings to take
down buildings. These are IDF sources.
Or the fact that they are being told
to just follow along what the AI tells
them to do. That they're being driven by
a time sensitive concept, so they're not even
able to check the AI. So the point
becomes, it's not our fault. AI told us
to. We didn't we we're being told we're
supposed to listen to it. There's a reason
that's happening, guys.
Here's the or another example. They've written many
of these. Now this is this one's called
Lavender. The AI machine directing Israel's bombing spree
in Gaza. 1 was about building structures, one
was specifically about individuals.
And they are using these to assassinate people
on a large scale.
Let's not forget, I I think there's what?
At least 4 or 5 IDF whistleblowers
since October 7th who have spoke up and
told you what they're doing. This is why
we're saying we're done pretending. K? They are
there, the evidence the the the evidence we
have around any one of these would be
enough in any court to put somebody in
prison.
Do you think that you witnessed
war crimes taking place?
Probably.
The ground assumption is that they are Hamas.
And then if you go this way, you're
bound to kill people that are not.
Now in a rare interview, one soldier tells
us about the reality he says he witnessed.
What kind of stuff would they say? There
are no uninvolved, only unarmed. This is something
that I'm going to carry for the rest
of my life.
There are many, many examples of that. Now
if you watch the full that is that
was just the opening clip I broke off.
The actual interview is horrifying.
Exactly what we're talking about. He's going, yes.
I saw that. Yes. They did that. I
was there. This is gonna haunt me forever.
Now here is Jewish Voice For Peace saying,
a growing number of Americans now this now
shifting into another segment just generally about the
idea of the
the food or starvation,
which, again, is obvious.
Except now they've shifted into it's a hoax,
which they've just kinda left there recently. Even
one of the women that from one of
the spokesman that tried to tell me that
I was lying about it, I proved that
she was wrong and then she blocked me,
which I'm pretty sure is a violation of
Twitter terms of terms of service, but who
cares? Because they won't enforce it against an
Israeli entity. It says, a growing number of
Americans are calling on US secretary of state
blink Blinken to impeach to be impeached for
lying to congress and denying that the Israeli
government, as we now provably know and did
before this anyway, is deliberately blocking humanitarian aid
from entering Gaza.
Now in case you missed oh, dang it.
In case you missed
the ProPublica article, I'll grab that for you.
And it's not just that either. I mean,
just this is just one of many
mainstream investigations. And the point is, in this
case, this is 2 different government bodies concluding
that they lied, that they knew and they
lied. And then it went even further where
apparently, Blinken was approving their striking of of
aid convoys as long as they thought Hamas
might be able to use it. All of
this has come out. This guy should be
in prison.
They all should be. It says last week,
ProPublica revealed that the US governmental agencies had
confirmed
that Israel's deliberate starvation of Palestinians was happening,
which meant that under US law, the US
was required to suspend its weapon shipments. They
knew that. They didn't care. They lied to
you about it. But in May, Blinken off
Blinken's office denied that. That was a thread
that you can read.
My point is just as I thought.
A scapegoat.
Remember I just said this. He certainly deserves
all that's coming his way, but he is
just a front man, guys.
Think about it. He's the one that keeps
getting shoved out to make these statements that
we all know are lies, that you can
prove in real time as he's saying them
or even the opposite of what Netanyahu is
saying. And yet he still says it. He
is a useful idiot in this conversation. And
the point is, they're they're calling for him
to be impeached. Whether it happens or not,
he's up in the air, but it's obviously
justifiable. He's caught lying. But the reality is
it wasn't blinking. It was the administration. It
was our whole of government, left or right,
justify they know what they're doing.
Include this ProPublica article. Worth reading. It's an
important article. Now here was the drop site
article we've also mentioned. Blinken approved policy to
bomb a trucks. It's not just theirs it's
not just their was this this is a
substack. Right?
Oh, no. It's it's a I forget. Anyway,
yeah. You you could personalize it. I'm pretty
sure it's a substack. Right?
Yeah. Substack. It's it's not just their substack.
They they're they're they're citing documents that you
can prove. And these are these are investigations.
And the point is, it's all very clear.
It's all right on the surface. People are
just pretending it's not there because they have
an interest.
Here is the Libertarian Institute. White House ignored
warnings from Pentagon,
State Department that Israel was creating a catastrophe.
See how these are all different stories, but
aiming in the same direction. This is from
October 7th, yesterday.
Recently released emails, which you can read for
yourself, from Reuters
show that show that officials in the White
House ignored warnings from their counterparts
at the department of state at the defense
and state department,
warning that Israel was committing war crimes
and creating a humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
How many more things do we need? I
mean, what this needs to show you is
that there's nothing that can hold them accountable
Because we live in a broken system that
we need to fight to fix. Because everything
shows you what they're doing.
They just kinda wait.
Okay. Nothing's happening. No one's there's no pitchforks
and and torches here. Okay. So let's keep
going.
Let that resonate with you right now. That's
what's happening.
I'm not calling for violence.
But you damn well better do something. Whether
it's a show like this, protesting, petitioning your
whatever you think may happen, do something.
Because I I'll tell you right now, I
think what we're doing right here is making
a difference.
But what we need is more. And more
than just on which I do outside of
this. More physical. We're real world action.
But we need to do something. Because when
we don't,
they take that as a sign to keep
going.
Now here is just one of the horrifying
examples that are happening every single day. And
we already talked about this.
This is
I mean, even admitted by Israel.
These are cans
designed to look like food
that are actually bombs.
Now it at I think this is I
mean, I've countless examples. I've seen at least
met 3 of these, I think, off top
of my head, of children, deliberately. Like, I
think these are even aimed at children. There
was one example that was left around toys
or a backpack, and it says 3 hungry
children
are seriously injured in con Eunice, you know,
the safe zone, after picking up an Israeli
trick incendiary disguised as a can of food.
Sorry. You may have to look at this.
Yeah. What you what you have to understand
is this is deliberate. This is a choice
designed to do this.
There's no way you make that is you
know, you can't make that anything else. Dan
Cohen also points out, like, we've shown you
countless times, whether it's Elon Levy and the
rest of them or in Barsky just lying
about
bread factories that are working even though we
can prove they bombed them in October.
Right? Those same month this started. And then
weeks later, they're claiming there's a bread factory
pumping out more bread than ever or him
saying it's a hoax that there's even people
starving even though we can prove by every
account that people are literally dying, catastrophic food
insecurity according to the IPC.
Here's another example of this.
Zionist this is from Dan Cohen who we
just had a great interview with. Zionist Israel's
final solution for Northern Gaza is begin being
implemented right now. We're gonna touch on that
at the end about northern Gaza. This is
the most heinous crime in human history for
the simple fact that we are watching it
happen in real time. On top, what I
keep saying, that not only they're doing it,
they're telling you it's the righteous thing to
do. That it's the right thing to do.
It it kills me.
But it says, and the western powers are
actively supporting it. This, what you're staring at,
is the only flower warehouse in Ghibliya camp.
It only had a few sacks for 100
of thousands of people. This means as they
surround Jabaliya Camp with tanks, Palestinians will die
of hunger
if they survive the bombs.
This is deliberate. There's no way around it.
There's not this wasn't a bombing. They burned
these. They set it on fire. It's what
they keep doing.
Here's the IPC.
The integrated food security phase classification. Like the
group to look at for the conversation of
whether or not a group is in
starving.
Famine is eminent in 1,100,000
people.
Half of Gaza
experience catastrophic food insecurity.
This isn't new either. This I've only got
a date on here, but this was yeah.
Right here. This is as of May.
May 2024.
Excuse me. Something's caught in my throat.
Which is why, by the way,
I'm including this yet again.
We haven't seen this in a minute. I
haven't shown it in a minute. This is
from the OCHA.
This is this is the breakdown of how
many trucks they're sending through. As we've been
pulled away to Lebanon, a lot of people
anyway,
I keep telling you this, guys.
It is literally declining.
So, if you remember that before October 7th,
500 trucks a day were coming in, including
fuel,
that at that point, they were already dangerously
food insecure.
So point being, 500 a day was already
not enough at that time. Then they kick
started the genocide by deliberately bringing it down
to 9 a day, which only guaranteed people
would starve.
And then never,
not for one moment, did they ever get
past, at most, a 165 a day. A
fraction of what's needed to maintain even the
food insecurity.
And they lied about it. Elon Levy lies
about it. We've never sent more food in
our lives. Just
bombastic.
Then
it's now since June, July, August, September, down
to 52 a day. All of August, it
was 65 trucks a day. People are literally
starving in real time.
And and by the way, they now have
more crossings open than they did before. And
there's and now they're bringing it down. There's
a deliberate action happening here, guys.
So that's the point. We know they're starving.
In May, half of them were in danger
of famine. It's already there,
By all accounts.
Now, here's Assad Rod pointing out what Sayedirakat
was trying to confront Matt Miller about.
And this is about the amount of money
that they've dumped in the hands of people
knowing everything we just showed you. Despite the
fact that we know it's a crime based
on everything we just showed you. And we
have the evidence showing you that Blinken and
the rest of them have now been caught
knowing that that's the case. And yet, he
still defends sending money to Israel. It's a
crime.
There is literally nothing about this. This is
legitimate in any possible way, and yet he
still because what else they're gonna do? You're
caught. Alright? In one side of his mind,
he sees a jail cell. On the other
side, he sees lies for Israel. What do
you think he chooses?
That's if that's if he even cares.
The point is the way he responds. The
the righteous indignation. And of course the funny
part, when Matt whenever Matt Lee speaks up,
Matt Miller cowards like a little child, which
is hilarious. Which who knows why? I mean,
Matt Miller Matt Lee does have a lot
of standing in this room. What's funny to
me is that whatever it is, everyone else
will cut off. And Matt Lee will speak
right over him in the face that he
makes.
My one moment of of enjoyment during all
this horrible stuff. To watch Matt Miller cower
like a little you'll see. But my point
is that they're sending this much money.
All the way up to now and then
defending continuing it. As we can prove they're
raping people in prison or elsewhere, as they're
murdering children, deliberately gleefully laughing about it, as
they are starving people to death, as they
are harvesting organs, as they are committing a
genocide moving into Lebanon, here he is defending
all of it.
Them on taxpayers
paid for,
almost $23,000,000,000
in the last year alone. That's almost $3,000
for each and every,
Israelis.
So we have you have absolutely no leverage
on
no pressure. You cannot tell them do this
or not do this. So we made very
clear to the governor of Israel what,
we believe are the best outcomes along a
number of different,
vectors in the region. But as you've heard
me say before, they're ultimately a sovereign country
and have to make their own Except they're
breaking you're breaking the law, and they're breaking
the law, and you damn well know that.
But just like they know that around the
Azov movement, they don't care. They knew they
were breaking the law, and they just funded
them anyway. It's the same thing. I'm what
frustrates me is that none of them point
that out. Like, right there is the best
opportunity to be like, but you we all
know based on your own government statements
that they block aid. Which means it's illegal
to fund them with armed. You know that.
But he would just deflect, but it would
still be on the record, but they don't
do that. But that's the point, though. It
is illegal because of that. He doesn't care.
Decisions. Yes. But I understand. But a sovereign
country that received from American taxpayers
that received
$22,000,000,000
So first of all, that number that number
is not correct. It's It's more, and I
can prove it to you. But he's trying
to downplay it like it's less based on
confusing factors, which Matt Lee tears them apart
for. Because he, Daniel, knows that the it's
easy to find the reality. Guys, I'm telling
you, it's very easy to prove. I I
just went over the information recently, just even
over the last packages.
In the last so many months, it's like
50,000,000,000.
And on top of almost 4,000,000,000 a year.
But regardless,
it's far too much money. Right. Conflates a
number of different things. I mean, no. No.
But it's not it's not it's not correct.
It's not it conflates
What is it?
I don't have the exact number, but if
you look at the I know there's another
number you're referring to. I mean, you yeah.
The number for they came out of Yeah.
We're taking out I mean, I mean, there
was something So so what's the US government?
What what was the US government that it
has given Israel since October 7th? So I
don't know. We give them $3,300,000,000
a year, and there was additional money that
was appropriated in the supplemental. The reason it's
hard to answer that question definitively is They
don't want to. That's why. No. Yeah. See,
Matt called him because he don't want to
answer it. Yes. That's why it's hard to
answer it. There are different ways of looking
at it. There are money, there's money that
is appropriate, there's money that's out and and
then not actually delivered for years to come.
Educational or organizations that have come up with
Right there. I love it. Meek coward. For
whatever reason, he bows to Matt Lee. I
love it. And because and and everyone else,
he will just run over the top. He
tried, but Matt also knows he's got standing
there. And you could see it in the
demeanor.
Matt has the upper hand over Matt Miller.
Matt Lee has the upper hand over Matt
Miller, and I love it. Call it a
petty point all you want. I think Matt
Miller is a horrible person, and I enjoy
watching him be put in his place. The
estimates the the they're gonna come up with
estimates.
This building, at least, which is in charge
of, arms transfers, at least
many of them,
hasn't seen fit to come up with an
update
since July of last year. Which is how
they usually do this. Right? They just, oh,
you know, we didn't get to it. No.
You deliberately held it off. There's a reason
we claimed that, you know, I think it
was, like, 10,000 people have been killed in
Yemen for, like, like, 11 years straight because
they just stopped telling you what they were
the numbers was were exponentially higher than that
because they were dying of famine, but they
just kinda held it at the old number,
and I could have the number wrong. The
point is when it and eventually was looked
into, it was shockingly higher, but they just
kept repeating that number because they simply never
updated the amount that was coming in. It's
the same thing. They do it on purpose.
I'm glad to see people saying, you know
what? We're done with your BS.
Yeah. I just don't have the update. I'm
just telling you that number. You can look
at you can look at that number and
see how it conflates a number of things,
including direct
US military spending to combat the Houthis attacking
international shipping, We've included in that number, which
is obviously not easy.
Difficult to No. It's not. Before he goes
past that, that's not the case. Because the
reality is the Houthis have not killed anybody.
Nobody. Just like Iran shooting and not killing
anybody. Because the point is they're deliberately trying
to demonstrate the difference between the belligerence of
the US and Israel, whether or not they're
a good entity. They see a strategic benefit
in doing so, and they have.
And all they're doing is stopping the shipments
that are only only, nobody else, they've proven
this, going to help Israel. And they said,
once you'll stop your genocide, we'll stop this
game. And they know that. So, yes, it's
for Israel. And, yes, it's for your agenda
at the expense of everybody. But what Matt
goes on to say is that, look, just
stop BS ing us. You know you could
just split this apart. It's obvious to see
the difference. And I again, the way he
looks is funny because he he he just
cowers.
Combat the Houthis attacking international shipping, which
is obviously not a big deal. Difficult to
separate what has been
what has been given to them
post October 7th
in terms of
in terms of Sure. In terms of things
that were not
approved before then
under the MOU,
stuff that went to them
specifically for the Gaza operate and now Lebanon.
So it's it depends how you look at
it. Is it the amount that's been allocated
to them? Is it the amount that's been
delivered to them? Is it amount that is
gonna be delivered to I'll take any of
the No. I know. That's that's the point.
Yeah. Yeah. Give me all 3, Matt. Go.
I mean, does he does he really think
that sounds complicated? Those are basic three categories
that would take 30 seconds to break down.
He's and this is the best they have,
you understand? They don't want you to know.
Why do you think that is? Because when
you ask the question, it's a difficult one.
I have the numbers here at my fingertips,
obviously. I'm just pointing out the number that's
Okay.
Super complicated.
Three categories. Whoo. Man, it'll take us all
year. In some place.
Now the numbers were,
Brown University's number, not mine, and so on.
But, you know, it doesn't matter what the
the actual figure is. But we give them
a lot of money. We give them a
great deal,
of leverage. You know, they we we give
them, obviously, a great deal of,
political coverage in in the in the UN
and many other places and so on,
and suggest that, you know,
the this huge and lengthy partnership
really
does not exact any kind of leverage with
the Israelis.
Don't you question that? That's not what I
said. The the thing that I said is
that He didn't put any words in your
mouth. He asked a basic question. But the
point see, Matt's sense is that you're getting
at something, and he's defending against what he
thinks you're getting at. That's what a dishonest
person does. That's the basic question. You're giving
them 1,000,000,000 of dollars, and nothing you say
makes a difference. Doesn't that seem a problem
to you? That's the real question, which he'll
never answer. And even if he gets pushed
to it, he'll argue, like, yo, they're a
sovereign country. They can do what they want.
Well, we're back to the point where what
you're doing is illegal, so you're wrong.
We are a sovereign country with our interests.
They're a sovereign country with their interests. There
it is.
We make our we
have very direct conversations with them about what
we think the appropriate path forward is. But,
ultimately, like every sovereign country, they have to
make their own decisions. They have to bear
the consequences for those decisions. Right. You know,
you wanna commit you wanna commit genocide? That's
on you. You go ahead and do that.
Or but see the point is there's consequences.
Except there's not, though. Right? So we come
full around the circle. The point is that
if you don't have consequences,
then that's where that story ends. So you
go, we need you to do this, and
we're we're tough about it. And then they
go, well, we don't care. And then you
do nothing about that, and guess what they
learn?
They're not gonna do anything. So you can
go ahead and speak about all you want.
We we demand this, and we're gonna raise
the issue. And you know and I doubt
that's even happening. But even if it is,
if you're not doing anything, there are no
consequences, then they won't care.
It's just blatant.
That's why this is so hard for people
and even some of them in the room.
We all know he's lying. We all know
that. Everybody.
It's very easy to see. Here's anti war.
Support for Israel has cost US taxpayers at
least,
I'm glad they said that, $22,760,000,000
in 1 year. It's more than that.
Just like our our foreign you know, our
military spending is exponentially more. I again, shouldn't
that's the wrong word.
A lot more than 1 trill what was
it? It was way I've I've pulling off
the top of my head. The number that
they're discussing, it's shockingly more than that because
of all the black operations that, you know,
the black ops, the things that we don't
see, or the money that they allot for
things technically not military even though they very
clearly get used for military, it's all a
game. It's how they work these. It's how
they play the job numbers. They're always playing.
They're always lying to you.
Now on the point of you know, so
over here, we're talking about starving children. Right?
The starvation tactics or the bombing of hospitals.
The bomb here is the point about targeting
health workers, ambulance drivers,
teachers,
aid workers,
targeting them. Now I've I've I've shared this
many times. And I I keep planning on
adding more, I just haven't got a chance
to yet. This is a thread from August
22nd with so far I mean, I'm gonna
add I think I think I have at
least 4 or 5 more than I need
to add. These are doctors speaking up, telling
you that they're targeting children, that they're murdering
people, that they're assassinating
doctors
who they've taken, whether they are Israel's Indian
or not.
Every single one of them, without question, not
mincing words, they're murdering innocent people right in
front of us. And yet, we're like, well,
we don't know for sure.
It's horrifying to me. And every single time
I post this one video,
every time, every single time, they put a
warning on it, which
immediately
stops the threat the the reach in its
tracks. Now, weirdly, I see people post it,
and it doesn't get this warning.
I guess it's just a coincidence.
Now here's what's interesting. I posted this under
a bunch of people's videos.
1 of those, 23rd, but you'll see many,
many, many in a row.
All of a sudden. Right? For whatever reason,
somebody called notice to it, and Twitter in
the these are all these are all the
same day this came through. I got 2
different notifications like this where they're going, we
flagged these as in pro inappropriate.
Every single one that you're looking at here.
And there's more than just this.
Or this video.
Here's one example.
Pause the video, and this guy's saying, United
States stands with Israel. That's when I was
saying it, like, that day when it was
everywhere. And I said, no. Barat politicians pretending
to represent the United States stand with Israel.
The rest of the world sees you and
sees this.
Flagged.
Because it starts going somewhere, even as a
even as a share from underneath.
And they stop it with the sensitive tag.
Why is it sensitive? It's not there it's
just words. There's plenty of actual graphic stuff
going on. There are people saying, murder their
families in Palestine. No one cares.
But when Ryan shares a video that has
a lot of impact, Twitter immediately suppresses it.
I think you know why. Because this video
is incredible. And I've I've I've played I
mean, even though you guys have probably seen
it 5 times, I think it's powerful. When
were you in
Gaza? End of April for the 1st couple
weeks, and then there's sniper bullets. I have
children that were shot twice. Wait. You're saying
that children in Gaza are being shot by
snipers. Definitively.
I have 2 children that I have photographs
of that were shot so perfectly in their
chest I couldn't put my stethoscope over their
heart more accurately
and directly on the side of the head
in the same child. No toddler gets shot
twice by mistake by the world's best sniper,
and they're dead center shots.
In fact, more than 20 doctors recently in
Gaza
also told Sunday morning about gunshot wounds to
children.
One American doctor told us he even reviewed
CT scans to confirm what he saw because
he, quote, didn't believe that this many children
could be admitted to a single hospital with
gunshot wounds to the head. Down with the
beginning. Some shootings
have been captured on video.
So of all the disaster zones you've seen,
how does Gaza compare?
All of the disasters
I've seen combined
combined. 40 mission trips, 30 years,
ground 0,
earthquakes.
All of that combined
doesn't equal
the level of carnage
that I saw against civilians
in just my 1st week in Gaza. Combined
for civilians. Is it mostly children?
My god.
Almost exclusively children.
I've never seen that before. It blows my
mind every time I listen to this. Never
seen that. I've seen more
incinerated children than I've ever seen in my
entire life combined. I've seen more shredded children
in just the 1st week. Shredded? Shredded. What
do you mean? Missing body parts, being crushed
by buildings, the greatest majority, or bomb explosions,
the next greatest majority. We've taken shrapnel as
big as my thumb
out of 8 year olds.
The UN reports that to date, more than
80% of Gaza's population has been displaced
and the majority of its buildings
destroyed.
A reality which has taken its own toll
on the well-being of children.
Now here is the long thread. Every single
one of these is giving you something in
that effect.
This is the one in from Al Sheva
Hospital telling you that he has witnessed them
assassinate doctors.
He and that not a single doctor in
anything, anyone he's talked to in all of
this has ever seen a Hamas member in
these hospitals with them.
Of course, he could be wrong. He could
be missing it. But how much do we
need?
And, of course, that's why they put a
warning on it, in my opinion anyway. Because
it's it gets reach. It affects people. It
informs them about what's really going on. Almost
exclusively
children. Everything he's ever done combined, he saw
more in the 1st week in Gaza.
There's just no ignoring stuff like this. This
is why people like Liam are outraged.
I'm just down. I'm pretending like what you're
saying is even legitimately worthy of anything but
ridicule.
Here is Matt Gilbert, Mads Gilbert, one of
the people that have been talking about this
a lot, and he's one of the people
in that thread.
Israel has now killed a 1,000 health care
workers in Palestine
and Lebanon
because it's happening in Lebanon now too with
total impunity.
He says, what would the world have said
if a 1,000 Israeli Jewish health care workers
had been killed by a military force attacking
their country? What what doesn't matter what the
justification or logic would be. You damn well
know.
It's the same way the US government calls
people who defend against their illegal invasions terrorists.
That's how this game is played. Even though
they're just defending a in in illegal occupation
or invasion. Soleimani is where they get the
term from when they claim he killed Americans.
He he defended against a US government's invasion
of an illegal occupation. We now know for
a fact.
It's it's this is the way they play
this game. That's why as Caitlin recently said,
John Stone, the you should know by now,
the terrorist designation
is ridiculous. It's arbitrary. It simply means unruly
populations that we need to bomb.
Here's what Mads Gilbert had to say.
The last UN numbers from Orchard,
summing up 850
killed health care workers in Gaza since the
7th
October.
If we add the 100 plus killed in
Lebanon,
we have probably passed 1,000
health care workers killed by the Israeli occupation
forces in occupied Palestine and in Lebanon.
What would the world have said if 1,000
Israeli
Jewish
health care workers, medical students, nurses
had been killed
by some
military force
attacking their country. We know the answer,
and we can't stand it.
See that for the podcast. WHO. 28 health
care workers killed in Lebanon in 24 hours.
So this is the point. Like I said
earlier,
this is not Gaza.
K? These clumsy claims about tunnels and human
shields, there's no justifiable reason to take it
face value that they have some indication that
that even exists.
On top of that, 28 in 24 hours.
So what what? Are we tell tying doctors
to their legs? Is there any evidence whatsoever
to make this case?
No.
Nobody is buying this. There's only people who
are invested and people who are going along.
I mean, people are invested in the narrative
for any number of reasons and then people
that are simply Zionists. That's how I look
at this. Of course, there's always it's never
all absolute. There's gonna be people that are
are not paying attention, people that are because
they're not paying attention, just believe the narrative.
My point though is that we see the
categories.
You're if you are even halfway paying attention,
you know what's happening. Unless you're politically invested
or simply a Zionist.
Here is
Will Cristo pointing out a Guardian article. Lebanese
health care workers fearful as growing numbers killed
in strikes.
October 3rd, paramedics say there's a pattern.
Weird how it seems to be the exact
same pattern they've used in Yemen, they've used
in Syria, and they've used in every other
war Israel and the US have been involved
in. When they arrive to save the wounded,
Israel strikes begin. You know, or like Saudi
Arabia. Well, I guess that's Yemen, same point,
but this is what we've seen everywhere.
See it's constant, guys. In fact, what they
usually do is bomb something and then wait
for a come people to come save them,
and then the real bomb comes in. Straight
up terrorism.
And by the way, an obvious war crime.
Rescuers started getting calls ordering them to evacuate
their headquarters.
Again, I don't understand how anybody hasn't that's
crazy to me. Now, not just calls, mind
you. They're getting, like, messages sent to their
phones. They're infiltrating their tech. On top of
that, why do they think they have the
right to order people like a Lebanese government
building that has nothing to do with Hezbollah
to evacuate?
Because it's not about anything but bombing Lebanon
just like they are with Gaza. It's Palestinians.
They're killing Lebanese people.
Fears grow among Lebanese medical workers as Israel
kills 50 of them in 2 weeks. 50.
28 in 2 in one out in one
day.
So, to go on to Lebanon in general,
this was from October
6th, 2 days ago. Guarantee the numbers have
gone up a lot since then.
Howard Beckett simply says, this is happening in
Lebanon.
So imagine,
acknowledge the fact that we have simply shifted
over to Lebanon
without even a break.
That's what I was saying before. That they
just cobble together the same clumsy narrative, the
same exact statements, and it's all happening again.
Human shield, every home, every tunnel, every single
group, and just mass carpet bombing Beirut
or individual location or using the it's exactly
the same things we've seen. If you can
acknowledge that what they did in Gaza, even
if they were telling the truth is a
crime,
how do you how do we even pretend
that this is even remotely unpathed with something
in line with international law? We all know
it's not. They are committing genocide in Lebanon
the same way they were in Gaza.
A hun 1,974
dead as of the 6th. A 127
children.
1,200,000
displaced,
which again, I guarantee will be pointed at
as the problem the moment they need to
do so.
Okay. The IDF steps up on the 4th
and says, over the last 4 days, the
IDF has eliminated 2,000 military
targets. How would they even go about verifying
that, guys?
And 250 Hezbollah terr terrorists. So what exactly
would they call the military targets versus Hezbollah?
I guess the buildings maybe they're talking about?
The point is as as Kim Iverson points
out, as they always do, just like they
exposed themselves for in Gaza when it first
started, counting every male over the age of
15 within your civilian deaths don't count. Even
worse in Gaza, and their own media called
them out for this. They were caught pointing
to every Palestinian
killed
as terrorists in their lists.
Right in the beginning, they kept showing 200
terrorists killed today. And then it quickly came
out that they were talking about everybody. Children,
women, any Palestinian killed, that was their number.
Which by the way, I don't know why
I have to pretend that's not the most
obvious thing in the world. They're telling you
that if you listen, if you watch their
TikTok streams.
But my point is, the Zionists and the
willfully ignorant don't wanna talk about it. Oh,
it's weird.
Hold on.
UN refugee chief says air strikes in Lebanon
have violated international law. But, of course, because
the UN is Hezbollah now, I guess?
Fake news.
Right? I mean, they've already done it. They've
already actually called. There's already people saying that
Lebanon is not even a real state, that
it never was. It didn't even exist.
Well, I guess what else do you do
but try to apply the same narrative that
you think worked for you? It didn't really
work for them. It's just that they've got
the US government blindly allowing their genocide.
And the u and the UK, and others
as well.
So they're simply telling you 2 days ago,
they're cr not may, not kind of, not
maybe, they are violating the law with what
they're doing.
Guess what? It keeps going.
Daniel McAdams points out the bombings that are
taking place. G DD geopolitics, Israeli air strikes,
this was as of today,
civilian casualties.
Video scenes from
Syria.
My point is this is constant. When they
by the way, they've been bombing Syria
periodically every other every week, long before October
7th, which every single time is a crime.
Apartment block was reportedly the target. So what's
the game now? Are we talking about Hamas
now, or we just not pretend we're ignoring
that you just bombed a civilian apartment building
in Syria?
Like, how do you even pretend like that's
some kind of like, if we're gonna pretend
over here that only because we're the most
moral army and we're only going after human
shields, but then you just periodically bomb a
building full of people in Syria. No one
talks about it. Iran was there though, we're
told.
Even if they are, that's not a crime.
On top of that, you're just bombing a
whole building because Iran's in Syria?
I mean, the point is it's so flimsy.
No one even in the past has even
pushed back on these things. Now suddenly, everyone
is, and it looks like a cartoon.
Ask yourself how this has been allowed for
this long.
Daniel says what we're all thinking. How has
it become normalized that it's okay to take
out whole blocks of residential high rise housing
because you think there might be one bad
guy in the area?
How in 2024 is this accepted in line
with law of war? It's not, is the
point.
They're just doing it anyway.
Ask yourself why it's continuing.
Sana Saeed points out Netanyahu backed by the
Biden administration
is threatening another genocide.
And, guy, the link is right here for
you. This is directly from The Guardian.
It says Netanyahu
warns the people in Lebanon.
It says of today,
you could face destruction like Gaza. And don't
forget, and we already showed you, as, plenty
of them have already said.
Let's see if it pops up.
Yep. Right there. Multiple examples, actually. Here's the
Jerusalem
post. Grant threatens Hezbollah. No. He threatens Lebanon,
and says, quote, we can do in Gaza,
we can do in Beirut.
That's all it's exactly what it sounds like.
We're we can do whatever we want in
Lebanon just like we're doing in Gaza.
There you go. Now, he's warning them, get
out of the way in their country. Not
Gaza in a left in a sovereign neighboring
country.
Move out of the way or you're gonna
die is what he's saying. It's your fault
if you stay behind as we indiscriminately
bomb your home.
He's warned Lebanese people that they could face
destruction, suffering
like the Palestinians in Gaza. That's what they
wrote in this article. If they don't free
the country from Hezbollah. So now you're demanding
they take actions in their country or you're
gonna murder them all? How are we, anybody,
pretending this is not just blatant terrorism?
Like, this is supposed to be their narrative
and it's terrorism. Imagine what they're actually thinking.
I mean, guys, this is so terrifying that
it's happening in real time and they're just
letting it happen. This guy says, I literally
gasp at this news. Netanyahu has delivered an
ultimatum to Lebanon to free the country of
Hezbollah, an extremely powerful paramilitary organization, which by
the way has broad support for the people
of Lebanon. Or face quote, destruction and suffering
like we see in Gaza. This isn't opening
a new war front. It's a call for
new genocidal operations. Like, my opinion, that's why
I framed it this way today.
It's everything is the same. So if we're
gonna argue that the logic is not necessarily
how many have been killed, which is actually
the reality of one of the many deciding
factors for genocide. Even though they're going very
quickly to reach those numbers in Lebanon,
they're they're choosing to annihilate these people, and
they're doing it the same way as Gaza.
This is another genocide. It's simply the same
genocide.
That's what's really going on and we all
see it.
Sad.
Now, today, or rather lea late yesterday, Israel
launches intense wave of air strikes on a
120
different sites in Lebanon.
So I guess we're all we're assuming every
one of them are tunnels or targets or
what. We're just ignoring that.
You can read through this. You can look
for yourself where some of these these are
civilian
targets.
They're murdering people in front of you.
As Tiberias writes yesterday,
Israel has killed more Lebanese civilians in the
last 2 weeks
than the total killed on October 7th.
Yet, the western establishment puppets are still bleeding
about October 7th while supplying the weapons for
the ongoing massacres in Lebanon.
Zero credibility. On top of that,
realize that more in just 2 weeks than
than all that were killed on October 7th,
knowing that most of them were killed by
Israeli actions.
Whether by Hannibal directive, by indiscriminate bombing,
any number of factors we've already proven to
you that even the Israeli media have shown
you.
And that all that the point is it
doesn't even matter.
Yet, they still just point back to October
7th.
Why do you think that is?
Mehdi Hasan points out what UNICEF says.
And this really blows my mind.
Not because they care, these are sociopaths, but
the average people out there that may still
be ignoring this.
At least a 100 children
have been killed in Lebanon in 11 days.
And over 9 690
children have been injured in the last 6
weeks. So think about this, guys. A 100
children in 11 days.
This is just getting started, just just like
with Gaza. How long until it's 10,000?
Oh, but there's human shields and stuff. You
know, right. The same what at what point
do we recognize this? Now I I know
I'm I know speak preaching to the choir.
I know you guys get it.
My the point is so infuriating that just
like we said with Gaza, we're watching this
build.
There's no narrative that makes this make sense.
Oh, so that's why it's okay to kill
10,000 children. Understood. It doesn't make sense. That's
why this is so jarring.
UNICEF and partners are providing emergency medical supplies
and essential services.
As he says, no western country would tolerate
the killing of a 100 kids in 11
days. And if this was Israel, not Lebanon,
every western country would be up in arms
and it would dominate the news as we
all know.
Now here, again, is what Matt had to
say. Very short clip. But after all that
we just saw, after the provable evidence says
even this the the US government entities are
saying, yes. They broke the law. Yes. We
shouldn't be funding their with their genocide.
And everything else we've seen, all the provable
examples of what they're currently doing in Lebanon
and Gaza, here's what this coward has to
say. That we have seen as of yet
leads us to conclude that they are doing
anything other than targeting
a terrorist organization.
Oh, got it. Despite the high number of
civilian deaths, doesn't matter. They claim they're targeting
them and whoopsie, killed a bunch of kids
but, you know, they tried their best. Is
that how the law works, Matt?
Guys, these people deserve to be in prison.
I mean, what they're doing right now should
be enough in any court of law. This
is complicity. You're covering up the genocide you're
funding and arming.
That's what his job is. But just like
Blinken, he's a stooge.
He is the mindless talker set out there
to play the front man, so if something
needs to be thrown to the bus, that's
him right there.
He may not think that, that's the truth.
Now here is a Oh, first this actually,
Asaul Raj is pointing out.
Remember when bombing hospitals was a big deal?
They sure used to be, at least they
claimed that. After destroying Gaza's healthcare system, now
Israel's attacking hospitals and killing medics in Lebanon.
Where there's no hostages to quote rescue.
How does that make sense?
This is a war crime. Funded by US
tax dollars and US officials couldn't care less.
Lebanon hospitals closed as Israeli air strikes hit
their facilities.
What are we saying? Are there tunnels? Are
we just pretending like we don't care?
That everybody needs to be
If you have a care for human life,
or the law,
or sovereignty, or any number of things,
it's time to speak up about this.
Sarah Abdallah points out that Israel dropped bombs
on health care centers in in Jaya, Lebanon.
6 Lebanese hospitals are now out of service
due to Israeli bombs. 6. It's just getting
started. How is that even possible?
This is from the 5th.
This is terrorism.
100%.
Rami Abdul from the Euromet Human Rights Group,
after destroying 90% of Gaza's mosques, Israeli warplanes
have bombed a mosque in Yore in Southern
Southern Lebanon.
Southern Lebanon. What is Israel's issue with places
of worship?
And really, look look at this. It's the
same thing we keep seeing.
Targeted destruction of their infrastructure.
I am Palestine. The Israeli occupation has bombed
near Beirut International Airport in the capital of
Lebanon. Four videos showing you different examples of
just bombing what are supposed to be protected
areas. They don't care.
This one I really this this just adds
insult to injury. Because it's obvious and it's
what they've done every time in the past.
Israel is dropping depleted uranium bombs on residential
buildings in Beirut.
Read that again. Depleted uranium bombs on civilians.
These highly toxic weapons cause birth defects and
cancer rates in Iraq's, Basra, and Fallujah worse
than Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
And realized that we're talking about using these
which are illegal anywhere on civilian targets only
exponential increasing the criminality.
And this is from a a,
Cradle article.
But here
oh, actually, so this is the article coming
from,
the UN this is what's the platform again?
The US Naval Institute.
Closer look at Israel's use of 80 bunker
bombs. So this guy simply oh, wait. Did
I put this in the wrong spot?
Oh, shoot.
Well, I'll read it here either way. I
it's again it looks like it looks like
I mixed a couple of these up. This
one is simply about the so point is
we're using they're using depleted uranium. Actually, here,
let me do this. I'll I'll finish with
that. So here is what I think is
important. So this is from Beirut dotcom.
Citing, now again, take it with a grain
of salt. Obviously, people could be lying but
I'll show you why I think it's a
very valid claim. The syndicate of chemists in
Lebanon, which just because it's from Lebanon does
not therefore mean terrorists we shouldn't trust Like
the idiots in politician in in in wall
excuse me. In the White House or in
congress want you to think,
they're far more
terrorist in every possible way than everything we're
talking about today because of what they've done
around the world and continue to advocate for.
Whether Israel, US politicians, it's obvious. But, nonetheless,
because it's in Lebanon, they have an interest
in giving a certain evidence of considerate. But
my point is, they're showing you that they
tested
the blast sites and are finding depleted uranium,
which my point is clearly, this is a
public claim, and the information is going to
be tested. Mark my words.
And the point is, they're telling you that
they're using depleted uranium. Now here is the
actual,
oh, wait. Hold on.
Oh, you know what I did? I have
it written down, not on a screen you
could see. Hold on. It's, let's see.
It's not she's technically not important. I just
wanted you to see the claim and we'll
go to it next. It you you could
break this down, Orwell sent me the translation.
So basically, they're just telling you exactly what
I'm saying. They're telling you that they tested
this and they're using depleted uranium.
And here, the cradle covered this and did
their investigation which they conclude the same thing.
My point is there should be no question
about this.
Obviously, other than the the general question about
whether they may just say that to benefit
their current narrative. But again, my point is
that historically speaking, and this is not Hezbollah,
it's Lebanon. They're telling you that they found
this and they're the evidence we presented most
likely in some kind of a setting. Like,
remember the last time when when Iran
what was it again? It was,
I forget his name.
I like him. He's a guy from one
of these Iranian foreign ministers that was very
savvy and and intelligent. Anyway, his point was
he tried to go to the UN to
present evidence about the lies they're presenting around
Iran. You know what they did? They refused
to let him in. It just shows you
how dishonest they are. Like, they they they
say they're fake claims, they can't prove, no
one believes them, and it comes to show
they're lying and they won't even let them
in. So my point on top of it
is that the evidence will be presented. On
top of that, the US has already sent
them to Ukraine.
This is recent. This is from the Ukraine
ongoing war. This is at a point when
we all already know and deem them illegal.
They do it anyway.
This is according to their own reports.
On top of that, going back to Iraq,
we know they've used them. The US fired
depleted uranium at civilians. You see the point?
It's not just firing them. They targeted civilians
according to their own reports.
Here's a study going back to this the
same conversation. Weaponized uranium and adverse health outcomes
in Iraq. Showing you that they're even showing
how long this happens. And this is where
you get into how this was worse than
the bombings of of Japan.
In the context of the after of the
long term effects.
Here is a report with Democracy Now showing
you that 10 years later, US has left
Iraq with mass displacement
as always and an epidemic of birth defects
because of what they use. The this is
my point, guys. These things are constant and
always used after the fact. In many cases,
to make it look like their country is
can't take care of themselves, like they're unhealthy,
or here to use their mass displacement to
benefit your other agendas.
Every single time.
2019, new study documents depleted uranium impacts on
children in Iraq.
Here we are
doing it again.
If you don't think the US government is
aware or involved,
which, I mean, is my opinion, but if
you don't think that it's possible, then you're
not paying attention.
Now here is what Blinken had to say
after all of this. After all that's going
on,
on 4th, he says the US is at
the forefront of humanitarian response
to the growing crisis in Lebanon.
The growing crisis?
What is it? A flood?
Funny how you can do more right now
about this than care about people in North
Carolina. Right? I didn't see you make a
big statement about how the growing crisis in
North Carolina. Right? But the growing crisis and
by that by by growing crisis, do you
mean Israeli carpet bombings of the civilians that
you're actively obfuscating?
Like, 6 full buildings in regard to bombing.
Like, it's incredible.
Like, this is my point about like, I
feel like he's being put to this stuff.
As an individual, you must realize how stupid
that is. Like, we all see what's going
on. And you don't even reference Israel, the
growing crisis in Lebanon like it's their fault?
He's announcing as we already pointed out and
many already have around what's going on in
North Carolina, a 157,000,000
in assistance. But, of course, my point is
many of the ones griping about that would
never point out or would be okay with
them funding Israel
while not caring about North Carolina. Like Lindsey
Graham, for example, or many of the republican
leadership, or many of the leading republican mainstream
alternative media.
I care about all of it. It's consistent
logic. If we're gonna say that we shouldn't
be sending any money overseas while Americans are
suffering,
we have to agree with that in every
dynamic, which I would agree with.
Now now, obviously, if we're gonna pick a
and to the fur if we're gonna go
beyond that and pick something that needs to
be fun, well, obviously, I would argue the
places that are suffering because of our foreign
policy or the government's foreign policy. But I
think the line is clear.
If we're in a position where you're we're
pretending we don't have money for North Carolina,
then we shouldn't be sending money anywhere overseas,
anywhere. Even if we feel a moral obligation
to do so. No.
I think that's important. But in other way,
he goes on to say, we are committed
to supporting those in need,
Like, you know, the ones being killed by
your bombs. Or deserving ascent delivering essential aid
that Israel can block and lie about, that
you know about, and you'll hide from us.
You get where this is going.
I just didn't make great it's incredible.
I've I've set set secretary Blinken is a
war
criminal, without question.
And I added to that, as he knowingly
obfuscates this Israeli campaign of death, remember this
is exactly what it looks like to manufacture
a refugee crisis and wealth transfer.
Don't forget that fact when the US government
in the near future is blaming them for
what it it was a central part in
creating.
And then this one, again, lastly, since this
was,
wrong more so just about the bombing, I
should have had the last segment. Israel apparently
used more bunker bombs,
bunker busters,
to kill Nasrallah, which by the way killed
100 of people in multiple buildings.
They more they used more bunker busters to
do that than the US used in the
entirety of the 2003 invasion of Iraq,
according to the government. This is from the
US naval, what was it called again?
US Naval Institute.
I mean, how do we even pretend like
so here they are talking about precision strikes.
Most moral army. More strategic than any weapon
any military in history.
If we're to believe that makes sense?
So you're you're and now on top of
that, what the people the argument they made
about the pagers. Oh, so we're being told
that you can pinpoint target a single pager
on one person, but yet then you're carpet
bombing entire buildings. Right? What what was that
about precise again? You know? It it's just
incredible. Even though we know that pager discussion
was actually far more indiscriminate, it's about using
their narratives against them. They're arguing from within
their narrative from the COVID conversation. The point
here is they're highlighting the fact that they
did.
And they did they used more than the
entirety of the invasion of Iraq. So that's
money that your your tax dollars are going
toward towards what they're using indiscriminately killing people.
Like, they could've used one of those, mind
you. But the reason I would argue they
didn't is like I said, they didn't know
for sure, which is why they didn't even
point to it until after the fact. It's
because they just broad stroke killed everywhere in
the area while got under a guise of
diplomacy and while in New York with the
UN pretending like you want peace. And ordered
it, murdered them all more than the entirety
of the invasion of Iraq, or we're gonna
pretend like they was a pinpoint target for
civilians. I mean, it's just it's
disgusting. And this is where we come to
the point about, you know, that same old
clip we see here. Are we the baddies?
And so my point is listen, guys. Maybe
especially those that are new. You are not
the government.
It's one of the most classic manipulations.
They are rep they they are supposed to
work for you. They're the government is not
the people. Now they're from the people, but
once they become the government, they are simply
an app they are an entity that is
supposed to work for the people. To conflate
the idea of the government as a body
with the people is an illusion. Individually, yes.
They would be part of the people, but
the government as an entity is not.
But today, they love to conflate that to
make it seem like they are just like
you or you're like, they have the same
rights that you do. They that's not the
case.
I say, even if you're still tricked into
thinking your vote matters. It should, by the
way, but they've stolen it from us. Nonetheless,
many of us need to ask ourselves.
Oh, come to Jesus meeting, guys. If our
government represents everything we pretend to fight.
Can we not can can we ask ourselves
that? Do they represent
everything
that they wanna pretend they're fighting right now?
If you're honest with yourself,
the answer is very clear.
And here is an example of Dave David
Kampf from antiwar.com.
He says, I forgot that the US embassy,
I guess is what we're calling this,
in in Lebanon is basically a fortress.
Look at this. It's like Game of Thrones.
That's supposed to be the embassy?
How do people get to it? It's a
it's a walled off fortress. Guys, that's an
occupation.
That that's where this is going. That's the
design. That's what Israel's gonna do, and the
US is gonna blindly support.
So here, on the final parts of Lebanon
discussion, Sarah Abdallah points we already showed you
this recently, but the point is that this
is the road leading to Lebanon's international civilian
airport.
Not only is there rubble in the street,
it's broken and blocked off. Okay? So they're
stopping that. Now we already showed you this
reality. Israel spoke up at the beginning and
said, we're not letting flights out because, you
know, weapons.
Okay?
The problem was that the US embassy spoke
up and said I think I've got that
actually.
Right here.
They spoke up and said the US embassy
is not
evacuating US citizens. You'd think they've learned their
lesson from this from, like, Libya. So nope.
Because I don't think there was a lesson
to be learned there. I think these are
deliberate actions, mind you. They don't care about
you.
Or whether or not you're in the government,
mind you. But the point,
a US embassy is not evacuating US citizens.
That's why they know Israel is shutting down
their airports because weapons.
So the worst part is there's a commercially
available flight. So we're not gonna pay for
you to leave, even though we know you're
a threat because Israel's carpet bombing.
Well, you could pay for it, right? Except
they already know Israel wasn't letting it go.
That's that's in addition to the fact that
the civilian itself was being shut down. They
weren't letting flights out.
So your government, knowing you were there, knowing
they were covered bombing, wouldn't help you leave,
and then said, yeah. Go ahead and fly
out when they knew that you couldn't.
And that's why it's important to point out
that a un American citizen was killed
in Lebanon because of these indiscriminate strikes.
And even worse, as Sarah Rall points out,
genuinely surprised that there's no visible media at
Kamal's at Kamal Jawad's funeral.
He's a US
citizen whose 4 children grew up in Dearborn,
Michigan.
They're grads of United the University of Michigan
in Stanford.
He was killed in an Israeli airstrike
this week.
His family is in Lebanon. Visiting family in
Lebanon.
That's him right there.
I guess it doesn't matter because you can
kinda casually pretend, like, maybe he's a terrorist
because they killed. The point is, whoever out
there screaming about America,
make America great again, America first, and you're
blindly supporting the ignorance of your American First
politicians who don't speak up about Americans being
killed by a foreign government,
then you don't care about America First. At
least admit that you're pretending
or how look. However you wanna look at
it. We cannot pretend that this makes sense.
They're murdering Americans whether accidentally or not and
not a word from an American politician.
If it was an Israeli American in Gaza,
oh my god. We hear about it for
3 weeks.
Do you notice the difference?
You damn well should. It should drive you
crazy if you actually care about America first.
Here is an America Israeli ambassador.
Just the this speaks for itself.
Even Sky News is pushing back and saying,
well, you are killing people. But the way
they respond, this is right now. Even with
Lebanon, with everything else we're seeing, with the
death toll we've seen, they're still sticking to
their guns because what else they're gonna do?
You've also,
eliminated
people. 28 health workers died in Israeli raids
one day in one day this week.
Children have died. The pager,
and to walkie talkie attacks. Of course, they
were targeted at Hezbollah
fighters, but Oh, of course.
Why would you say that? See, that's the
point. They're you're giving intent. You don't know
what their intent was. All we know is
it happened. But he's giving that bone because
that's what corporate media does. But even what
he just said so far, is anyone how
can you imagine from there going, but we
don't wanna target civilian? So 28 health care
workers in 24 hours. But, no, it wasn't
our fault.
Because these these are children.
Children have earned too much power that don't
deserve it. You didn't know who's who was
gonna be in the room, and some people
who were clearly not,
fighters,
died.
Yeah. So to you miss so we they
didn't know who was gonna be in the
room with those pagers. 5 months, they were
there. There's no denying that. She didn't even
push back. But, yet, I don't wanna kill
civilians, though, even though you clearly did. The
point here is
the collateral nobody is arguing about Israel's right
to defend itself. Yeah. No. We are though
because they don't have a legal right to
defend themselves as an occupying force.
Funny how the law and the basic approval
reality is a missed point by the journalists
of today.
But the collateral damage that Israel is building
up,
is, some people would argue,
building up actually even more hostility,
creating more enemies,
preparing a new generation
of fighters against Israel. It's Which is what
they want because that's how they preserve the
Zionist mentality and the Zionist illusion of necessity.
That's really the way. So we have zero
interest in killing civilians.
Think about just saying that.
You just murdered 28 doctors in 44 hours.
You don't even have a narrative for why.
But we don't want to though. Oh, gotcha.
Okay. End of interview.
For interest neither in Gaza or in Lebanon.
We have nothing But you're doing it? No.
We're not doing it. What we're actually Well,
they're not. No. We're actually Well, they're not.
No. We're actually what it's Hamas and Hezbollah
who are in charge. And let me explain
why. Because they're using Well, they're in charge.
Their own people as human shields. And you
know that. Wow. You know that. There are
terror organizations that couldn't care less about their
human life in Gaza. It it it just
every day by day, it just begins to
get more cartoonish.
The 4th and you know that. And you
know you're supposed to say that too.
No. We don't know that. The evidence is
not there. It has not been there. Robert's
covered this many times going back to old
UN investigations. I for the again, I would
be the last person to argue that they
would never do that. But the evidence is
not there, and the evidence is there in
a landslide from human shields from Israel.
You see? And and, again, this is what
we're talking about. These people need to be
the ones going, no. I'm done. I'm done
pretending this makes sense. You're lying and we
know it. That's where we all need to
be. This is Senua with this cynical plan
created
infrastructure in Gaza that turned every hospital, every
nursery and kindergarten
into a place You realize that's provably false.
We can go right now as people have
already done and show that every house you
look in does not have a tunnel. And
I don't mean like
I mean, I mean, everyone I we have
the point is, I don't see any.
0.
And there is evidence to look at.
So even there right there, even if there
are some that we haven't seen, she's lying.
And everybody knows that. There's not a tunnel
under every home and every school. That's the
way they justify murdering everybody.
But on top of that, over and over
and over, at least 4 times that I've
seen, they've been caught lying about these things.
Shefa was embarrassing for them. But they got
caught pretending tunnels were where they weren't,
pretending they show here, we walk into the
tunnel and then edit, and all of a
sudden, there's a different color or wires where
they weren't before. Like, these are bad propagandists.
But it doesn't matter because historically, they could
just shout down a viewer like this and
peep they would follow suit.
There's a storage for rockets. And my point
is you Can you imagine my point is
you this type of cool and cynical plan
of of anyone doing that besides a terror
organization.
And my point is you know that, and
that's your point. That's your viewpoint.
I love how he says your viewpoint. See,
that's different.
Usually, it would just be meek allowance of
the shouted narrative, but he he even kinda
said your viewpoint would suggest that that might
not be the case. But you are still
as a country, and not you personally, but,
obviously, Israel
is still pursuing
an aggressive military strategy,
which does
does create this level of collateral
damage.
That's the point. That's what we said in
the very beginning. And any UN expert, human
rights lawyer who
is be the bat let's just put the
the vast majority, say for the Zionist fake
human rights lawyers like Arson Ostrovsky,
are very clearly telling you, this is collective
punishment. There's no narrative that makes this make
sense. You don't bomb an entire building full
of 400 people to kill one commander, which
is the argument they made with Wolf Blitzer.
Acting like that made sense. It just doesn't,
guys. There is no legal justification. I don't
care if he had all of them tied
to his arms. It's still a crime.
And that's going to come out at some
point, but they're just shoving this forward. And
again, why we pretend like these media talking
heads even know what they're talking about?
And some of them do. That's my point.
It's just because they don't know how to
push back does not mean that what they're
saying is the full picture.
Now,
how much are you prepared
to,
contemplate
in pursuit of your war? I I don't
agree with the accusation. I think that, Well,
it's just a fact. To begin, Nada. It's
not People die because of Israeli Wait a
second. People die because your attacks in
And you see how this goes. You did
it in Iraq. Now, what about I can
do it too? See my point? And that's
always what they do. They left the last
ditch effort.
Nobody cared that you murdered civilians in Iraq.
So in essentially, you're saying you are murdering
civilians, but it's okay because you did it
too? Oops.
People died because your attack in in Afghanistan
and in Iraq. There is no western military,
no matter how much cautious wants to be,
that can operate better than the way IDF
is 100%. Easily I mean, guys, do you
realize that there are metrics already showing that
they've used, what, more bombs that in in
in Gaza in a short period of time
than all the wars of World War 2
combined or whatever the metric was. Like, they
we keep doing this. They keep showing you
the combination of children killed in in just
this one time frame is more than all
the children killed in multiple years of the
past. There's no way you make sense of
that with what you just said. And that's
not defending western warfare. Western warfare is just
as criminal.
Yeah. Not I mean, they're I'm specifically thinking
of the US government at this moment, but
plenty of other examples.
So you can't compare these because, provably, you
have gone,
I mean,
what's the right term there? Just I mean,
quite quite a bit further. With every single
thing you're doing, with every action you're taking,
more and more, you're breaking every record we've
ever seen of the wrong direction for war.
Every one of them. But our argument is
simply that you killed them just as many
as we did.
I don't know why you think that's a
fair argument. Creating in a very populated area.
What we do what we do and it's
important to say, we warn the population.
Nope. They lie. They countless times, they don't.
We made designated areas in Gaza. That you
then bombed as well, and everybody, including your
own media, has proven this. We called the
population in Lebanon to flee and actually listening.
Nope. Most of them didn't. And the
most of them end up fleeing the 1,000,000.2
people that are out struggling because you just
bombed their homes and bombed civilian areas. And
the ones that are are fleeing for their
lives because you're bombing indiscriminately.
Hey. This is being proven. It's being filled.
But, again, what else they gonna do? They
gotta trot out their liars to try to
convince the one person that might listen to
them. To our to our, calling. And they
are fleeing to a better place to be
Better place?
Wait. It's fucking it's a that's a weird
way to say that. Safe, and we are
minimizing casualties. Do you need Minimizing casualties? 28
doctors in one in one day?
I mean, this it's really insulting to your
intelligence. To anyone that this is my point.
Anybody with a brain and objectivity
is is just going, well, that's not true.
We know that's not true. So only people
that are going along with these people are
terrible people or willfully ignorant.
To understand, the main problem is the fact
those terror organizations are using them as human
shields, and by doing that, committing a double
war crime. Oh, a double war crime. Interesting.
These I'm telling you, see, they're just they're
uneducated.
It's just so funny. They're just lazy and
propaganda. It's it's it's not my opinion.
You can look at what they're doing. They're
saying things that don't even make sense. They're
clumsily packing together narratives. They've they've gotten away
with this for so long. And I'm only
talking about Zionists, whether Christian or Jewish. There's
just plenty of Israelis that I see right
now calling this out.
Now, oh, then this just so She's over
here saying human shields, human shields, right? In
Lebanon is what she's talking about. That's the
only reason.
And yet again, as always, they shoot themselves
in the foot 14 times over because they
lie about whatever they can to achieve a
narrative in the in when it suits them.
So 4 days before this started in Lebanon,
at least this current wave of their aggression,
well, here's the US is entity Israeli entity
telling you that they weren't doing that. And
suddenly, when it suits their interest, Daniel Hagari
says they've been doing it for 20 years.
1 of them are lying. You could pick.
Take a look at how many civilians were
killed in Lebanon
as a result as an unfortunate byproduct of
Israeli strikes. And if you compare that to,
the situation in Gaza, I think that what
you will find is it's the same IDF,
the same operating procedures that we have in
Gaza, only that here in Lebanon until now
the situation is that Hezbollah has so far
distinguished itself from civilian population and they haven't
been fighting from within cities. And as such,
when the IDF has deployed lethal weapons against
them, then terrorists have been killed and not
civilians.
So the point
is that because it suits him in that
moment to compare Lebanon to Gaza because that's
just they'll they'll take whatever they can to
lie to you. He's saying, see, in Gaza,
the civilian death count is higher because they're
doing human shields, even though it's because they've
been mob murdering them for a year. But
over here and look, it's less because they're
not, is his point.
4 days later,
suddenly, it's the opposite. Why? Because now they're
indiscriminately bombing in Lebanon.
So, again, I mean, I think it's very
obvious that the lie is the, is the
narrative of human shields to justify murder.
My point is though, if if you could
you could choose. You just have to acknowledge
that they're lying to you when it suits
their interests.
Over 20 years,
Hezbollah has deployed its arms inside homes and
militarized
civilian infrastructure.
There is a list.
As a result, the Hezbollah terrorist organization
has turned Southern Lebanon into a battlefield.
There is this guy just he just looks
like a clown. He's just a comically looking
person. I just yeah. I have no respect
for any of them. And and it's it's
just it's so embarrassing and in full
it infuriating that we have to sit here
and watch these people who you damn well
know know what they're doing. He knows what
he's doing. And yet, day in and day
out, they stand there and lie to you
while they murder and rape.
Now, warfare analysis points out something I think
is important to reference. Now, here's the actual
website, by the way, so you can check
it for yourself and know that this is
not, you know, mistranslated or whatever else.
There this is a guy reading to his
son. Now, what what do we keep hearing
about? All the indoctrination,
about how they Hamas and tell them and
terrorism. Okay. All the stuff they wanna tell
you.
This is what he's saying to his child,
reading a book. It says, this is Lebanon.
It is beautiful.
I love to go to Lebanon and stroll
there, said Alan.
It is dangerous. You cannot go there. It
is not ours yet.
Elon thought, he said oh, Elon thought and
said, Lebanon is ours.
That's what he's reading for his child.
It's a children's book titled Alon in Lebanon,
published by this website. It's Yurt Yurt Safon,
settlements in Lebanon Organization.
The book is authored by Amos Azara,
a lecturer at Arrow University.
So, the point is, just like we keep
telling you, there's already plans to occupy Lebanon.
It's been there for a long time. They've
coveted southern Lebanon forever.
This is called My Skin is North, the
movement for settlement in Southern Lebanon. The guy
is reading a book to his child about
how we own Lebanon, and it's not safe
yet, but we'll make it that way.
I mean, this is the real problem, the
projection of what they really are building.
It's pretty sad and it's pretty scary because
it's happening in real time, and a lot
of powerful people are trying to tell you
that they all deserve to die in Lebanon.
So to finish in regard to Gaza,
we just went past October 7th, the anniversary
of that day. I just wanna reiterate the
same old point that don't forget that Israel
funded Hamas right up until October 7th. And
for all we know, continues to. But the
point is the same. The reality of what
they've told you on the record where Ehud
Barak, former prime minister, and this person is
the the former head of Shin Bet, telling
you on the record, we gave them 1,000,000,000
of dollars in cash.
Now, again, for those that wanna pretend it's
about humanitarian aid, remind me again where they
get aid from. Oh, that's right. It's shipped
in on trucks because there is none there.
So let's pretend you can give them cash
to buy aid from the aid store?
No. No. You must bring it in, and
Israel controls that. So when they give them
cash,
what do you think it's for?
And realize that their own people have admitted
this. And that's why we include the actual
article from Horetz
that quotes Netanyahu in 2019
saying, anyone who wants to thwart the establishment
of a Palestinian state has to support Hamas.
Transferring money to Hamas.
That is our strategy. And he goes on
if you read the full document about how
they need to do this to make sure
the 2 state solution never happens, to make
sure they keep them divided,
and realize while this was being stated or
being done,
post October 60
1967, they were screaming that we want this.
We want a 2 day solution while provably
acting against that.
That's not for us. That's a fact.
So, maybe we should ask what else they're
lying about, don't you think? And here is
a harass article from 2020.
Looks like Twitter doesn't wanna load it. There
it goes. Masaad chief visited Doha, urged Cutter
to continue
Hamas financial aid. It's
alright in the surface. You guys know all
this. So my point now is that if
you're gonna start creating an outrage narrative of
October 7th anniversary about Hamas, you damn well
better include the fact that Israel was funding
them when that happened. But guess what? Not
a single US politician who spent all day
screaming about the worst attack on Jews except
there was a lot more than that, and
most of it was done by Israel when
you're ignoring that fact.
Now Matt Kennard points out this was a
status quo before October 7th. If anyone cares
to pay attention.
He says, and you're surprised people will resist?
WikiLeaks.
This is from 2,011.
Israel aimed to keep Gaza economy on the
brink of collapse. Now that's an economic point.
The same point applies to food. A long
time ago, they said minimal caloric and they
maintained
insecurity. And now we know why. Because then
they can pull the rug out and act
like they're still giving them some food and
say, they're stars, it's not our fault, knowing
that that rug pulling would guarantee starvation while
maintaining the illusion of giving them some food.
It's the same reason the US government occupies
countries and forces them to only produce what
the US needs for their interest or others
they're working with and demanding that they and
that they that
they import from the US. So the moment
they stop doing what they're told, they pull
that rug out and they can't sustain themselves,
and then turn around and say, see? They
can't even help themselves.
It's really dark if you realize how deep
this goes. Now as Solrod points out from
Al Jazeera,
there there they put out a recent documentary,
but this is a different there's a lot
a 120 minute one. This is a 58
minutes
simply going over, and this is actually mind
blowing.
58 minutes
is how long this is. Can you see
what it is?
Right now, we're only at 0 years old,
under 1 year olds.
Remember, the 1 year olds was 56 pages.
It's names of people killed in civilians
in Gaza.
More than 41,800
people have been killed.
Guess what this says? She she says that
a video listing names of Palestinians killed in
Gaza
is 59 minutes long.
It takes over a minute to get through
just 0 years old.
Visualizingpalestine.org
puts this out, and it says 6 wars
old.
If you really wanna reach some average people
out there,
look to your child sitting next to you.
Maybe they're 6 years old. Now imagine because
they're 6 years old, they have lived through
6 different genocidal wars
against their family.
Or rather, I guess, 16 years old, excuse
me. But they've lived through 60 6 wars
because they're lived for 16 years.
Born around I mean, you you can read
through of yourself. I'm I'm I wanna pretty
much wrap since we're pretty long, but the
point is that what do you think this
does to them, guys?
Every and every one of those are illegitimate.
Every single one of these we should now
know is being our organized and engineered and
and driven into reality for the execution of
Palestinians by and large.
Pelham points out this Palestinian elder, Haj Zaid
Abu Haleel,
who a while ago this is not new,
this video. He attempted to stop IDF soldiers
from firing on youth, As you can clearly
see. Literally putting his own body in the
way of them firing,
trying to stop them. And they're going, get
out of the way in front of fire
around him. Like, that's how ridiculous this is.
Now, of course, in this exam good point
to make sure you double check all of
this stuff. It says later in the afternoon,
it's not the same day, this was an
older story. The point was,
now today,
in the genocide ongoing,
they broke into this guy's house and beat
him to death.
Ask yourself why.
Taking advantage of somebody. He's a known
protester against what they do.
They're just recognizing people like this, and they
just break into his house and beat him
to death. Is there gonna be some kind,
some kind of a court trial?
No, of course not.
Not even in normal, like, whatever you would
call normal times, especially not right now.
This is what they live under.
Here is a former member of the IDF
telling you
his perspective on this. Those
who try very hard Oh, I'm sorry. I'm
I'm it's, the
former minister of finance. Excuse me. So from
within the Israeli government.
Who
try very hard
to extract from people like me, from DM
25,
a condemnation
of the attack
by
the Hamas guerrillas,
will never get it.
And they will never get it for a
very simple reason.
Those who care about
humans
without any discrimination,
those who care equally about
a Jew and an Arab,
must ask themselves a very simple question.
What exactly
is their idea
of the cessation
of hostilities?
That Palestinians are going to lay down their
arms
and go back to into the largest open
air prison in the world,
where they are constantly suffocated
by
the apartheid state?
In other words,
back in South Africa, in the era of
apartheid,
what was the problem? Was it that
some members of
the black resistance,
including the ANC, but not only the ANC,
took up arms against the South African regime
and sometimes killed innocent people? Was that the
problem with apartheid? No. The problem was apartheid.
Now important to point out though, I would
argue, and this is where we have to
draw a fine line. Now you can you
can, you know, have some acceptance in your
mind or allowance for the idea that this
is that, you know, what the that's what
they're saying. No more. People die. However you
wanna play that in your mind.
I argue today even with that that we
have to draw the fine line, like I
said, with Hamas. Kidap children,
killed peep there are crimes that were committed,
and they have to be held accountable for
that. Same point here though, is under apartheid,
which now we look back on and go
clearly that wasn't the apartheid of South Africa.
That was the that was the problem is
what he's saying.
But
there were end incidents where people from the
oppressed side
would respond and innocent people would be killed.
Now, obviously, the law the real problem was
the apartheid. But, and they're acting in resistance,
which is a legal right. But there's nonetheless
a line there where there should still be
accountability.
Right? You we when you can stand back
and take it in the larger context of
what's really going on, maybe lesser than the
larger picture, but I still think we need
to draw that line. But, you know, and
then allow you know, the point point is
people who are enforcement side of it can
decide that, well, this is why it happened,
and it wasn't their fault. Whatever. But the
point is it's still considered a crime. They
still killed innocent people.
Now I guarantee some will disagree with that
because they think that it's more important to
side with the with the resistance and the
context. And I understand where you're coming from,
and it largely I agree. But I think
with the way it is today, this is
like saying irritatingly objective. We have to stand
on the line. We have to be better
than the other side. It's like we keep
talking about where they rationalize doing the same
thing on a verse because they started it.
We need to be better than that.
Apartheid, whether it's practiced in South Africa or
in Palestine or Israel,
is always going to procure
violence,
because it's a violent
misanthropic
system.
Any human being living under apartheid
at some point will either die
a terrible
silent death Mhmm. Or rebel
and often
take
innocent
It's important
just to understand the the the difficult context,
and then realize the only reason they're in
that position to have to make that choice
is because of the apartheid state. And that's
really what he's talking about. Rami Abdul from
human EuroMed Human Rights Group says the Israeli
occupation bombs children as they sleep in their
homes,
October 5th.
This is guys this is ongoing, guys. This
is Gaza. This is this is that while
people are now focusing more on Lebanon, we
can't lose sight of what's going on. Realize
that the only reason Hezbollah is pushing back
on this is because they're fighting for Gaza.
So let's not lose sight of what this
is really about.
Now, this is a is a quick clip
from an insider who left BBC.
Now, let her explain why. It has to
do with this phrase you've heard a lot.
Israel has a right to defend itself. We
just heard that. Right? Sky News, whatever else.
Well, maybe this will change your opinion, hopefully,
on the reality of what they're actually saying.
Grail has a right to defend itself.
That was the editorial line that was drilled
into us, into all of our coverage.
It was really an integral part of the
editorial stance.
To a guest talking about,
you know,
Israeli air strikes killing Palestinians in Gaza,
that would be the response from our presenters.
Denying
to food is collective punishment, and and that's
we should all be clear in saying that.
Israel will argue obviously that it has a
right to defend itself. People were terrified of
using the word genocide in coverage. They still
are.
You will very rarely see it in any
BBC coverage.
And if an interviewee says the word genocide
This is a genocide happening in front of
our eyes. Yeah. We have yeah. We that
that word is, as you know, incredibly emotive,
and the Israelis, as you know, will be
saying that they are targeting Hamas only. The
presenter will almost always panic. The Labour Party
of all political parties, which has always had
a strong peace contingent within it, is now
actually supporting genocide. Okay. We we can maybe
just avoid that language, if that's
okay.
How wild is that? That first example of
defend yourself, the guy's literally talking about withholding
aid shipments. Well, they have a right to
defend themselves. That was a clumsy use, so
that's why they used it. That's one of
the worst examples I've seen.
And now we even on top of that,
have a verifiable evidence from our own government
telling you they know they did that.
But defend yourselves I mean, there guys, this
this whole thing is exposed so much more
than I think they ever ever thought was
possible. Now again, here's Wilkerson I played yesterday
at the end to show you, you know,
early somebody in with some political standing acknowledging
the facts.
Palestinians
had every right to do
Oops. On October 7th.
Israel
has been under the UN Charter as an
occupying power and under Geneva
since 1967.
It has never,
never fulfilled its responsibilities
as an occupying power.
And that's why UNRA exists, which is why
they're trying to remove it despite all the
lies they're producing.
It's about the right of return. That's what
he's talking about.
Never intended to fulfill them.
In fact, it has dispossessed the Palestinians of
their lands,
of their orchards,
destroyed their homes,
killed their children.
It is an irresponsible
under the law occupying power. Therefore,
the Palestinians
had every right to do what they did
on October 7th.
Every time that f 16 flies over Gaza
and drops that 250
pound bomb and kills that child,
you are guilty,
America.
Now realize that the point overall
is not that the crimes were committed were
okay, which is how they'll try to frame
that. It's that regardless of those crimes that
were committed, they still have a legal right
to arm resistance, which is what that what's
the which is how it started. Which is
never not it's always protected under national law.
Just that's just a simple fact. And that's
why it's become so uncomfortable for so many.
Now to finish, in general, I just wanna
include the information. I'm sure it's ongoing as
we speak.
Highlights that the the, Giora Island plan has
started. An Israeli member of Knesset from that
US party has announced, as you can look
for yourself,
that and this was last night, so this
was on the, the the 5th, that the
IDF launched an operation in Northern Gaza with
the objective of completely eliminating all Palestinians from
the area.
Here's a 972 article saying, a plan to
liquidate northern Gaza is gaining steam. This is
back in September. So this this is planned.
We all know this because it's been a
partition plan, the the settlements. I mean, all
of it is on the surface if you
actually look.
Now the cradle put out this today.
The Israel Israel has now issued a new
evacuation order for Jablia, Beth Hunan, Beth Lehiyah,
and other areas,
nearly the entire northern section of Gaza. So,
obviously, it's happening. Saying that the military will
act forcefully ordering residents to move south. Now
they, apparently, claimed to have given them 24
hours to get out of the way.
I mean, what are we talking about? You
realize there's an entire divider from north to
south.
They have nowhere to go. And even if
they go to the south, they're still bombing
everywhere. We just showed Yukon Eunice being I
mean,
this is why it's so torturous. That not
only do they know that, they know we
know that. They know the US government knows
that. And so they just laughingly tell them
to run around and then just bomb everywhere
they like.
Now it's a little more complicated than that,
but that's essentially what's happening.
Even
11 Kham Levon News confirms
the general's plan, as it's called, is underway.
The entire northern area of the Gaza Strip
will be cleansed
according to the general's plan.
That's what he says.
Finally,
this is as of today.
Gaza tonight, the general's plan stage 2. In
an extremely dangerous step as part of the
genocidal Gora Island Eeland plan,
Israeli military orders all three hospitals
all three hospitals operating in Northern Gaza to
shut down and evacuate in 24 hours. What
about the people in beds? What about people
starving? What about the ones that are so
emaciated or listing legs and arms that they
can't move? What about the elderly? What about
the babies?
Doesn't matter, guys. They don't care. Just like
they left them to rot in Gaza in
the the hospital. Was it a sheep? I
forget.
There's no nothing about this is legal like
everything else.
So get ready for another massacre
unless we somebody does something.
I think we already can tell that the
US government left or right doesn't care.
So it's on you
to care.
Thank you for tuning in guys.
I know it can be hard to talk
about this stuff. It can vary. It's it's
hard in general to know that this exists,
but the only way we're ever going to
change this is if we do something, if
we choose to care about it. If we
stand up and say, I'm done pretending what
you're saying is true. I'm done with your
BS. I'm not going to allow you to
just lie straight to my face no matter
what the context. I'm going to stand up
for what I know is right. I'm going
to accept the consequences of doing so because
I know it to be right.
Done.
Help me fight back. Because I'm tired of
seeing these people suffer.
Thank you for tuning in. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.