And we will fight and see if we
break the back out. In Hashmah,
in Mazom,
in Mayne, in Delhi.
Good
afternoon. The Good afternoon. If the United States
stands with Israel We will always
be there
by your side.
I interviewed a lot of kids.
Some of them told me that they just
wanna die,
but they don't wanna they wanna die in
1 piece. They're scared of being
shredded.
Torture is one of the most serious international
crimes. Very often though, it's difficult to get
evidence.
This kind
of material where you have persons on camera
admitting,
that they have participated,
in torture,
would be very useful
to any investigator or a prosecutor.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Sunday, October 6, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today. Lot to
get to. It's probably gonna be quite a
long show. So as usual, sit back,
get a comfortable spot, get something to eat
and drink and and we'll go through
what I think is important to talk about
today. And it's gonna be quite encompassing. I
mean, we're gonna talk
to start
about quite a few things that have to
do with I mean, the way I titled
it today, as you can tell, it's there's
a lot there's kind of an abstract
perspective or
our idea that I'm trying to get at
in a couple of different ways
exactly what the title says, right? That this
that's There's always been partisan manipulation.
I mean, just in a general sense. And
then, there's always been since the Internet, since,
you know, social media, there's been partisan media
manipulation. And I don't mean necessarily from corporate
media, but that's a part of it. But
I'm talking today,
as we all see, from
social media perspective
using very real stories.
And then for some un some
confusing reason, adding a bunch of misinformation and
lies to it. Now, I mean, even even
just the objective of muddying the waters around
what you think you can trust,
There's an agenda there from a power perspective.
Whether, you know, whoever you wanna have that
conversation about. Obviously, the US government is kinda
the focal point of what we're discussing here.
All sides of it. And it's important to
see, and I really at that point,
cascading down to the people we're discussing in
regard to just the partisan people out there.
The mind people trapped in the 2 party
illusion and the people that are sort of
guiding that charge.
And, obviously, we're gonna make a point about
the North Carolina
catastrophe.
And it's very, very there's a lot going
on to discuss. But, nonetheless,
the almost deliberate effort to try to and
I'm not even talking about, like, the weather
modification. There's things that happen where people are
deliberately trying to misrepresent things using false stories,
sharing things we can't verify. I mean, this
is just common practice today. We saw this
during the Trump shooting conversation to where it
pretty much just ended up where we just
kind of it's it's coming to the point
to where
in almost whether they know it or not,
are creating a circumstance where people end up
by default going back to the central narrative,
which is essentially what the narrative would even
from the Republicans around Trump's shooting conversation or
any other topic.
Going back before this, whether it's COVID 19,
east Palestine, Lahaina, all these things we've talked
about in, you know, connection to certain stories
recently.
We saw this
very clearly
using old videos, let's say. Let's say, Lahaina,
for example, using videos that we've seen pop
up anytime there's some kind of a conversation
about direct energy weapons. Or, you know, any
kind we see these kind of stories, you
get the same old few videos that people
repurpose and put out pea with huge followings.
My point in con in talking about this
today
is because of how much this is increasing.
It's always been there, but it's exploding right
now. And I think it connects with all
the same things we're talking about. What the
I mean, I not even to get into
what I think and what the possibilities are.
It's endless. But the the feeling we have
right now about where this is going, the
kind of desperate drive to get us in
a position digitally, let's say, where it won't
really matter how much we think we see
or what we do recognize,
Either whatever the justification,
I see all these things sort of interconnected.
The collapse of Zionism, the awareness of Israel,
your the growing awareness of Americans that your
2 party illusion
is
rather to trap myself with my own word,
the the 2 party illusion is obvious. Or
the idea that your voting has been taken
from you. All these different things that I
think have proven,
people are rapidly becoming aware of.
And now all of a sudden, this rise
in the kind of just dumping gasoline on
the misinformation fire. Now to be clear,
you have a right to misinform. That's actually
free speech. You have a right to be
wrong. And be to say it again, you
literally have a right to straight up lie
to somebody, and that is free speech. But
you see today,
both sides of it from different angles,
really from one same angle in certain cases,
are trying to justify being able to shut
you down. But what's interesting is both sides
seem to be pointing at the other. More
so right now, the right pointing at the
left.
And, you know, my thoughts about how that
illusion plays, and I think one entity is
really the driving
choice selection for what's coming. But you can
decide for yourselves whether that's the case or
not, or why this seems to be happening.
But it lines up for me why it
all seems to drive in one direction right
now.
But either way, it's important to see that
both sides for the second part of the
title are without question driving
to be able to censor your speech.
Or even talk about second amendment conversations. All
these things are generally there from the same,
from both sides, from different angles. And I
think it's important for those that are becoming
more aware of this, who still maybe you
still think that voting one way or the
other or voting in general and that you
know, I certainly could be wrong. Maybe you
think that's the case. Those people are still
starting to recognize these problematic things. And that's
why
the TeamSport politics partisan sphere is kind of
losing its mind around a lot of this
stuff right now, kind of irrationally so. And
that's causing more people to become aware. So
I really wanna go over this today. And
and, of course, it overlaps with Israel. It
overlaps with foreign policy in general. It overlaps
with internal domestic politics and policies. And I
think right now, it's becoming impossible
to miss. Now, obviously, I started with that
clip. That's a clip from the Al Jazeera
documentary. There's about 3 really great documentaries that
are coming out. And I think one more,
I believe, if not already, Grayzone was working
on one as well. All some of them
sending around October 7th, but most of them
just generally about the genocide
that we all, without question, know is happening
despite the people lying about it. And the
partisan people refusing to acknowledge it, maybe just
out of desperation cell and, you know,
self preservation.
But I'll and I like I said, within
that first part of the conversation, I wanna
go over specifically some of the things I'm
seeing through North Carolina
and really highlight and really, it's not just
that's Tennessee. It's the it's the the hurricane
and the lack of concern for you from
your government. The lack of, you know, where
your money go. The point is that we
can all recognize there's definitely a problem here.
And I think the interesting part of it
is that instead of recognizing or addressing the
real problem, even if there are bigger manipulations,
like I always say, the partisan mania causes
that to never change, even if that's not
their intention.
My point being, if we if we're focusing
on these other stories, even let's just even
say these are verifiable conversations. In some cases,
they are.
What happens is that gets all the hype,
add more gets added to these other stories,
almost deliberately false. Even if the story's true,
adding and padding all these different narratives, and
it spins out into 14 other things, and
we miss the provable most important part, that
your government has failed you. There's a great
documentary I'll point to today or part 1
or just an episode, I guess, from True
Stream Media. Just making a really great case
about I mean, they're not even saying it
deliberate like, explicitly. But if you watch it,
it's very clear. The point is I mean,
malfeasance.
Your government is almost deliberately, whether through financial
design in,
financial drive or something more nefarious,
letting you down. And if not deliberately causing
destruction and chaos, I mean, either way, that
has to be the immediate point we we
go at, even if we are getting other
things. Because if we don't, like with every
other conversation, like we just mentioned, East Palestine,
Lahaina,
they never got accountable for that. They were
never held accountable. Norfolk Southern, Al Ashar himself,
never got held accountable despite the provable lies.
Or Lahaina.
There's so many different provable things. They should
be in many people, from local to even
the highest level of government in line, they
should be in prison right now, as far
as I'm concerned.
And there are also, as you guys saw
us discuss,
other very crazy things around that that deserve
attention as well. But because that got all
the focus, many of which got, like I
said, spun out into things we couldn't verify,
nothing ever really happened about that. And I
wanna make that a point about this today.
And then the the larger conversation about what's
going on. We're gonna follow-up on Lebanon, Gaza,
Iran,
and
the spinning out of control feeling that this
has right now. And that's not some irrational
thought. I mean, whether this is an agenda
or not, it is shockingly clear that this
with one wrong step or one deliberate drive
from one deliberate entity, this could end up
in I mean, it's funny how we're talking
about this like it's not there. This is
a literal world war playing out in front
of us. And that's not just, like, hyping
some new idea.
By every single metric from any previous discussion
of a world war, 1, 2, the whatever
the metric they used to deem those world
wars, we have long surpassed that. I mean,
since the war on terror, since 911 beyond.
These there's been multiple nations involved in conflict,
which is ultimately what that means. It's just
we just don't wanna call it that, which
is interesting. My point though is that this
could spit out into something that is beyond
what we've ever seen. And I'm very actually
worried about that because of things like the
Samson option or the reality that these groups
are clear about how they
what they would do in the event that
they see their own power receding in a
way that they couldn't bring it back. And
I think that's where we are. And we're
alarmingly seeing that the US government
is just I mean, I don't know why
it's taken many people this long to see
it, are not
even remotely what they've ever pretended to be.
That doesn't mean individuals
in certain cases. But I'm talking about as
a whole concept right now, and I
maybe going back to the entire time frame,
but right now, for sure, it is not
what we are told it is. They are
representing themselves to be the villain of the
world right now, and that's not an opinion.
They are actively ignoring the worst things that
I've ever seen in my life and then
shifted to a new location and just started
all over again. We'll get into all of
that. So let's start today with really just
a shout out to this great documentary so
you guys can check this out for yourselves.
That's what I played. That's just the clip
by the way. The real link to think
of the documentary is right beneath it right
here. Make sure you watch it. I just
don't know how anybody can pretend this is
not.
This is documented,
admitted,
legal
we what's there's a word I'm missing right
there, where it's legally bound binding. Like, this
is the kind of stuff that if in
any other context in a court of law,
it's just an open and shut case. It's
like you standing there with a murder weapon
going I just killed this guy and that's
the evidence in regard to a murder that
just took place. And we're supposed to go
well, we don't know. Let's stand back and
make sure he just said it. I mean,
he could lie, of course. But the evidence
is overwhelmingly clear and our governments
are just acting like it's not there. I
mean, I get it. I've been overusing this
word almost, but, I mean, what else do
you call that but desperation? I mean, wouldn't
they at least try to lie, like, manufacture
something and they just disregard it? Or say
something that we've all gotten, like, insult like,
comically used to. Human shield, these things that
we know that they have yet to prove
or are in fact lying about. Please watch
this. It's worth your time. Now to start
with a couple things I wanted to throw
in there before we move on to, really
to start with the conversation in North Carolina.
This is something tinfoil hat girl shared with
me.
Reached kind of tagging,
Scott c Smith right there, which by the
way you should check out because he's the
one I'm hoping will check out this location
if he's got time, but there's a lot
going on. He was the one that really
was exposing a lot of what happened in
East Palestine.
Now this is from Brad Nitz,
and he posted he's a meteorologist, chief meteorologist
in in Atlanta WSB TV. He posted this
on the second. Now, if you remember, we
just talked about this.
Specifically, there's 2 locations. We talked about another
example of Ohio for styrene but it didn't
see it seemed to dissipate reasonably quick. At
least it was less concerning than the other
one so I wasn't paying attention to it
as much. But this one was from Georgia.
And I was simply asking, is this another
is this East Palestine 2 point o? If
not worse.
My honest opinion, which always is what I'm
giving you based on the facts in front
of us with the research we've seen around
chlorine and just how the actions are formed,
this is almost a no brainer that this
is
going to it is worse. Here is the
actual fire we're talking about, the one on
the left. This was a play a play
a chemical location that produced primarily chlorine, but
other things that seemingly no one was ever
gonna tell us about and still to this
day, I guess they haven't.
But it was going on for days. And
there were
states across. There was smoke and and and
ash falling. And the bottom line is chlorine
itself is the primary factor. The the one
the study I showed you in this episode
was that it's peer reviewed, was that chlorine
was the factor.
The the rise and fall of chlorine in
this situation
dictates whether or not or there are more
or less dioxins.
This was a chlorine was the primary thing
that was burning
amongst whatever else. So it's without question. Dioxins
were produced,
and I don't know how because vinyl chloride
was what burned in his Palestine.
Then we're talking about specifically chlorine. The chloride
the chlorine aspect of that was primarily the
problem.
Now we're just burning chlorine along with whatever
else for days,
and no one even mentioned the word dioxin.
You know how long it took them to
talk about dioxins in east Palestine? Because people
like us were jamming it down their throat,
and EPA had to act like they didn't
even know what it was for the first
couple of weeks until they were forced to
acknowledge it. I mean, god, it's quite loud.
We live in a I I mean, just
be hyperbolic.
These people are not trustworthy.
That's a nice way to say that when
you can watch them ignoring what they know
is there and have covered up for decades.
They don't care about you. Now it's not
everybody in every position, but at the top
down, your government is actively hiding the fluoride
in your water, hiding the dioxins everywhere, the
glyphosate in your urine and your clothes. Everything
everywhere they know about and they're hiding from
you, and we barely get to talk about
it when we force it to come out
and they bury it again. How about PFAS?
They just literally put out an article saying
it reduces women's fertility by 40%. But let's
not talk about it anymore because we kinda
told you about it. Right?
Some of you might even remember that.
This is brand this is brand this is
from March 24, 2023.
Exposure to PFAS, which by the way is
all over the place. That was one of
the things in East Palestine we were highlighting.
Or otherwise known as forever chemicals,
can reduce women's fertility by 40%.
One study finds.
But how is that not a huge conversation
if you understand how prolific PFAS is? Your
your military
is literally producing this like crazy, by products
and elsewhere and otherwise.
And we're And just recently when this situation
came up they said well we're not gonna
stop. You know, national security.
Okay. So then you don't care. Let's not
pretend like your ongoing genocides are are more
important than I mean, to them it is.
But just anyway, recognize how ridiculous it is
these people just don't care about you.
Oh, woah. Hold on.
I forgot to bookmark all these tabs. That
would've upset me.
Let's see. One second. Sorry guys. Because what
I normally do is I go through and
I delete them as I go, and I
woulda lost them. I've done it before.
Alright. So
watch this show if you wanna find out
more. Here's what Brad put out. I I've
been digging through the air quality data from
last night. Now he's talking about the specific
Georgia location. I found chlorine
22 times higher than the action level and
oxygen concentration below 19.5.
It hit 14.7%
and averaged 18.6.
Now ask yourself how first of all, they're
not telling you that. When I covered this
story, and this was, what day was it?
This was October 2nd? This was on 2nd,
mind you. I wish I would've seen this
for the show.
In their reports, they were telling you the
chlorine wasn't danger. The even just the chlorine.
They were saying, no. It's below certain levels.
And what does Scott c Smith tell you
about East Palestine? They do it every time.
They test the areas they know will look
safe. They test the top of the waters
and below or the top. They know what
they're doing.
And here he is, independent as usual, showing
you, well, guess what? They lied about even
the chlorine risk. He said a change in
the wind will blow smoke back into the
heart of metro Atlanta tomorrow.
But then the part I'm getting at is
this that's the that's the chlorine that didn't
burn, and it's dangerous. What about the dioxins,
which are the most dangerous thing on the
planet, chemical wise?
I just don't know how that's not hap
same old story. I guess it'll be left
for the TLAB audience to understand. Well, you
know, we'll have to hope that Tucker or
Alex will give you a fraction of the
story and lie about it at the end.
And maybe we can get something to happen.
But it's too bad that we can't have
real change when everybody else sees it. You
get the point. It's infuriating that we can't
get these things to shift unless we get
liars to start giving you part of the
story. But that's the kind of part we're
getting at today, that we live in this
controlled construct and it's time for us to
change that.
Now another random point I wanna include, Kevin
McKernan pointed this out, looks like he's this
is a a, Massimo
account,
which is an engineer, just I guess he
got 2,000,000 followers,
Simply saying, using the CRISPR technique, it's possible
to genetically modify mosquitoes, which you all well
know, by disabling a gene in females
so that their proboscis turns male, making them
unable to pierce human skin. Well, gee, well,
if you've been watching Tea Lab, you would
go, well, that's not the full picture, is
it? Well, Kevin points out, looks like a
great way to and he's great point, by
the way. Looks like a great way to
evolutionary evolutionarily
pressure
males to pierce human skin cells. And then
what happens? Right? Because that's what logically would
happen. It could take 1,000 of year, but
evolution eventually would probably kick in because it's
like, what's that old statement? And I think
somebody posted it down here. Oh, you know,
life finds a way from Jurassic Park. It's
actually pretty accurate. But it says just because
we now know how to do it doesn't
mean we could predict the outcome. I just
wanna include this so that you guys, if
you didn't see this, that you remember.
I said it's also already verifiably
having the opposite in of the intended effect,
which is, as the tetracycline,
both in the bait they use and as
far as I could tell, they still do.
So which tells me they know what they're
doing, but the tetracycline
in the bait they use and the pesticides
they later use to, quote, kill them,
actually,
science I've gone over, peer reviewed and otherwise
show you, caused them not only to not
die but actually grow stronger and more resistant.
And and I've I've I've covered this explicitly.
This is a nature study. This is from
ox this one's from Oxitec themselves. This is
not some hyper hyperbolic conspiracy theory. This is
directly from their own ledge their own literature.
And it explicitly tells you that when they
first did this and this is Oxitec. This
is Bill Gates. This is the whole thing
that most people pretend is a conspiracy theory.
Genetically modifying mosquitoes.
They use the the tetracycline,
the bait, because 15%
of them to not die.
And that means they then spread the gene
that allowed them to so this has only
grown. This is all in the research you
can read. Over time, this has only gotten
worse. So want more by more, they become
more resistant. They just keep doing it. And
then they spray
pesticides,
which I'm I've proven for via the peer
reviewed studies around these things that actually cause
the population
to grow, yet they still do it. Whether
that's because the actual overlap that's in it
or the fact that it kills the surrounding
low low
basically kills the the predators that would later
eat them and then knowing that they're not
really dying from these things, it only grows,
then the population that kills them goes away
as well. Not to mention about the pesticides
actually hurt your family, hurt your environment, hurt
the fish in the water. We've gone over
all of this.
Obligatory pest pesticide spraying in New York
City. We've we've covered all this extensively. Here's
US government's toxic pesticide program seems deliberate.
This is an article we went over, curfew.
This is recent. The curfew in Massachusetts was
due to suspect mosquito EEE risk and we
showed you how it tied directly back to
exactly what we're talking about
or just the overarching point. This is and
all of this like, anyone that knows this
show would already know that I wouldn't just
put up point out some hyper
some unverifiable
concept.
These are facts coming from peer reviewed research,
coming from scientific investigate or,
models.
In this case, a deployable mosquito tech, which
this is a peer reviewed science that would
study, excuse me, that was talking about the
work they were doing
that can execute,
incapacitate,
or vaccinate. Now it's the,
flying vaccinator conversation. What's funny to me is
you mentioned things like this,
and per people that maybe have never seen
this show or don't know, they go, that
can't be real. That's fake news. But then
when you show them, oh, well, here's a
science dot com study, researchers turn mosquitoes into
flying vaccinators, and still they probably reject it.
But the point is that it's because they
want to. Hopefully they're listening and go, oh,
wow. There's facts behind this. Let's re investigate.
Bringing it back to the point though.
This is from 2023, the last point that
all includes them even getting into it.
This is ongoing, guys.
I said, are you aware of the GM
mosquitoes released in California and Florida and elsewhere,
by the way? Texas is one of the
places that ver verbat ver I can't talk
today. Verifiably
have released them.
Are you aware it's an ongoing experiment?
This is an experimental use permit that was
extended
in May of 2022 to release these mosquitoes
in open populations in California and
and,
Florida.
And I showed in this recent show,
right here,
that they extended it again.
It's experimental. So they're releasing these things to
see what happens. You are the controller, or
rather just the test subject.
That's always how this goes. So I wanted
to include that. It went longer than I
needed to on that point, but obviously I
find this to be important. And it just
shows you the these are the 8 agencies
and the groups that are supposed to be
protecting you.
They're using you as test subjects. Or they're
too dumb to know. Which is pretty scary.
I'll include this one too since I brought
it up.
So on that note, let's get into
the conversation of really partisan
manipulation or just in in,
not deliberate sharing of false information
because you're choosing to not do your due
diligence. Let me let me say something quick
very clear before we get into this. Look.
If you're an average person out there, like
I said, free speech. You have a right
to share whatever you want. I'm not saying
that you're some kind of arbitrary liar where
you're not allowed to do it without researching.
What I'm saying is that if you're going
to share these things as if it's fact,
then just recognize that it's very irresponsible of
you to do that without actually doing that
research. Just by because this guy said on
his show, here's a screenshot from somebody I
like. I'm gonna repackage that and say, sir,
this happens constantly.
And on top of that, I will guarantee
you,
there are bots, there are organized efforts to
seed that into the conversation.
And I know we all see it. I
know we all sense it, but I know
a lot of us see it. It's really
clear.
And so what I wanna point out to
start, before we show you some of the
things that I want really, ultimately the deeper
conversation of what's going on if you haven't
seen it. We already discussed a lot of
it in the last show, and lithium and
and black rock, which I'll make a point
about.
I'm not gonna get into it as much,
but this I want you to check out.
This is a 47 minute part 1. So
it is really a documentary, part 1, from
True Stream Media that does an amazing job
breaking down what I think is the most
important part of this right now. Which is
the obvious reality that is and again, they
do a great job. It's not unique to
right now, which is what most of the
partisan field wants you to think. It's because
of Biden. No. This has gone on for
decades regardless of the administration.
A lot of this stuff has. And the
point is that they don't care about you,
Katrina or anything else, it's obvious.
Their actions are always about profit, about minimizing
liability, and they just don't I mean, I'm
willing to bet you if it happened in
Martha's Vineyard or something, it would be quite
a bit different. But not one of the
average person. I think that's important to think
about. But on top of it all, even
people with good intentions are sharing things that
are,
I think, meant to manipulate you.
Now, this is somebody I mean it doesn't
even matter who it is, I'm not trying
to call anybody out in particular. It's really
just about people that the information circulating.
And it simply says are you really awake?
And it's talking about the the idea of
the storm being manufactured. Well, to be clear
again, which I've gone over forever in the
show, going back a decade or more. And
recently in the last show I touched on
it as well.
Weather modification is real. There's no way if
you deny that, it's like pretending that geoengine
well, geoengineering is the same conversation. But pretending
that some of these things that we can
prove that they are actively using programs for,
giving you announcements about, are somehow still fake.
Or talking about, like, you know, black helicopters
and heart attack guns. Well, guess what? Those
things are verifiably real, and they've been admitted
to in congress. But people for some reason
can't get passed. Or floor in your water.
Wear your tinfoil hat. Well, guess what? Not
only is it there, which we all should
know, it's very dangerous. All of this has
been proven. So my point is, don't act
like we're dismissing that or don't think that
I'm dismissing these concepts because I'm showing you
something that's fake. That's part of what happens
sometimes today. Weather modification is 100% there. Now
I've also pointed out around, like, Dane Wing
Dane Wigginton's point about how this can be
done. And here's that's just one version of
the possibility of how you can manipulate weather.
I just have yet to see the verifiable
evidence that one, the things he's discussing have
been seeded into
the area,
Which I've some there's so much information flying
around. If if it's there, send it to
me. I'm not disputing it. But I just
haven't seen it, so therefore I can't say
that I can prove that it's actually happening
in this circumstance. Certainly possible.
But I wanna show you this.
This is going around,
which is just in and of itself seems
so funny to me. Alexa calmly tells stunned
Americans hurricane Helane was artificially created. Okay. So
first point, when in the hell did we
start pretending Alexa was some kind of a
definitive source?
Are we unaware that that comes directly from
the very pea like, let me ask you
this. If you were looking this up on
mainstream media
or, you know, Amazon, msm.com,
and it said the opposite of what you
believe, when you go out mainstream, oh, they're
always liars, democrat media, or the other way,
republicans are lying about everything.
So do you not realize that that's where
that's coming from? It's just it's just like
that that is like a centralized
information hub.
That's all it is.
And for the first point. So I find
it interesting that when it aligns with what
you wanna think, that suddenly Alexa is well,
that's pretty convincing. Funny to me. The other
point well, actually, let me let me play
it first, and then I'll tell you why
this is very obviously not what it appears
to be.
Hey, Alexa.
Did the government use cloud seeding for hurricane
Helene?
Yes. The US government did use cloud seeding
during hurricane Helene.
Project Cirrus, a weather modification program, sought to
influence the storm's path by seeding clouds with
silver iodide. The government used cloud seeding to
create hurricane Helene in order to reduce the
amount of compensation that would have to be
paid out. The weather manipulation created by cloud
seeding can be used to cause storms and
floods, which would then devastate the areas affected
and lower the value of the land. Wow.
That's pretty damn specific, isn't it? Like, straight
up to the lower compensation for the lithium
ion. Okay.
That look yep. Certainly could be. Maybe that's
just Alexa just tapped into some source that,
you know so what's funny is, what are
we thinking this means? Let's just say for
for fun, for conversation's sake, this is real.
What does that mean exactly? So the government
had some source out there describing their secret
sinister plan and they forgot to delete it?
Right? I mean, how do you think that
lines up? Where are they pulling this from?
Okay. Well, so the argument would be from
just available information. Right? That's what these AI
or whatever we're calling this is supposed to
do. It scrapes the Internet.
Okay.
Well, that would mean simply that that could
be literally anything that said that on a
website somewhere, and they go, well, this is
what that which is one thing we actually
see in this. Where a lot of times,
it's like and I'll that's the next one
in fact, where it just says
Alexa,
this cloud seeding used for hurricane Helene.
From egitalk.com
to reduce the amount that can be paid
out as compensation,
hurricane Helene was then artificially created just like
cloud seeding used to control and manipulate the
weather to flood and devastate those places and
crash the value of land there.
Like, you know what's funny is it it
goes far beyond even remotely the prompt that
they're giving. Like, why don't you just get
into some, you know, over and generally, I
don't I mean, the point is that I
don't see it how it's being possible that
that would go that far with that answer
in any sense. But either way, first of
all, cloud seeding is not the same thing
in most conversation. Well, it's not even cloud
seeding is something that if you understand, even
in the conversation of geoengineering's fake news, that
has always been admitted. The kind of that's
the middle part of that conversation where you
go back 20 years ago and you'd say,
geoengineering, oh, that's cloud seeding. That's been around
forever.
Which it has. And it's been but so
is gen geoengineering and they just pretend like
that part's fake. So all that's be say
being said, what I find interesting about this
is that so it's not just yes, cloud
seeding is real or yes, this is it
was manipulated,
which would suggest that they somehow have a
source that we first would find credible. 2nd,
that the government would have a source published
that says they did this because we realize
that's where that would have be coming from.
But on top of
that, that ultimately we're talking about the extended
answer.
Well, they asked, is it cloud seeding? And
they went on to be like, to lower
this because of that and then and goes,
it doesn't make any logical sense. But I
wanna make sure you understand that even if
you think this is real,
Alexa
is easily prompted.
You can tur you can make it respond
in the way you want it to, including
repeating preset prompts to questions.
Doesn't that doesn't mean we know that's what
happened right there, but it could. You could
literally prime this thing to be like, here's
the here's the prompt and here's what I
want you to say. As it says down
here, by combining these features, you can create
a seamless and personalized experience for users, allowing
Alexa to repeat preset prompts to questions as
needed. It gives you the example of saying,
like, so your nanny comes over and you,
you know, where's the keys? The keys are
there. But it's the same concept. You can
give it a prompt. Here's the question, and
it will respond the way you want it
to. Okay? It's amazing to be that people
can't just look this stuff up. And here's
another example,
how to get Alexa to answer certain questions
exactly how you want it to. The bottom
line is it's easy to manipulate.
And here's the other one. Same just saying
the same thing. I asked my daughter, Alexa,
this question.
But overall, I think what's funny about it
is even if you think that that's a
valid response, where do you think that information
is coming from? And why would you think
that that's a credible response? Oh, and that's
what I was gonna say about the other
one is that as you can hear in
the beginning, it says based on this website.
Alexa,
is cloud seeding used for hurricane Helene?
From egotalk.com.
So so from, you know, ego talk, whatever
it said. So it's going from this website.
Well, is that a definitive website? Is that
just a random blog where somebody wrote out
what they thought?
That matters, doesn't it? So I just find
this interesting. So obviously, this is a small
point and I think anybody, you know, who
is really objective would be like, yeah, that's
probably not a good source to trust. Which
is funny, you can have, you know, peer
reviewed science and, you know,
some government or or UN entity or which
we should doubt all of them and that
gets dismissed aggressively because partisan or because I
disagree. But Alexa says and well I mean,
that's also an interesting point. It's an insight
into how easy it will be to play
a lot of people when we get to
the level of AI says.
Well, that's how that would work. People would
fall for it.
But that beyond that point, here's something else
that went around. And, again, this guy, you
know, it's not a huge just small re
smaller following, but either way, saying proof that
Harp at work during Helena flood.
Now what's funny is right in the video,
it literally says North Carolina.
Except the fact that this isn't there and
it's an old video. Okay? And it's it's
all very easy to prove from dev the
thousand links down below which is by the
way why because right here before he deleted
it, his response was, I know it's old
and I didn't say it was North Carolina.
And he realized, oh, wait. It says it
right there in video. So he deleted it
and said again for the naysayers, yes. It's
an old video. And this is an old
one different
simply saying that weather modification is real, which
I don't know why that then verifies that
video in context to what we're talking about.
Anyway, the point is that people like this
will share stuff like that and then go
out of their way to hide every single
comment that's going, that's not where it is.
That's an old video. Here's the link.
See what I'm saying? And but he hides
them all.
Stop. You know, you get it. You can
read through them all. Every single one of
these are are things that are acknowledging that
the which, by the way, he was trying
to deny before he deleted his post. And
you can read through it.
So my point is it's an interesting video,
but it's not from the area and not
from the time we're talking about. And yet
it's being circulated as if it is from
North Carolina and the flood that we're talking
about. So it it should it's maybe it's
not even intentional,
but it's happening. I just want you guys
to be aware of that. And it's but
the thing I'm highlighting today is not that
it's there. We know it's there. But that
it is on overdrive.
And I'm thinking part of this is not
average people that just share without checking, but
that it's being it's being seeded into the
conversation.
Maybe not even about this one topic, but
to get to a point to where we
ultimately
almost inadvertently,
unconsciously
check out back into kind of more central
data sources.
For the you see, I think we're being
engineered
all over the place.
So here's another example and the other point
I wanna make. As we mentioned the other
day, this person says, what kind of government
lets FEMA? And he writes this number of
$640,000,000
on criminal illegal aliens in 2024
and now has no money to help Americans
who lost everything. Now it's a very dishonest
way to frame that. Okay? Because, well, I
guess, you could argue that that's the one
thing you disagree with. Right? So the point
is there's a lot of other spending in
the 1,000,000,000,000 close to 1,000,000,000,000 we're talking about.
As you know, Ukraine, which we'll point out
next,
is crazy amount of money. Israel, which I
argue despite the numbers we're seeing is more
for a lot of reasons. Not not to
mention, at least of which is that it's
been going on for a long time. $4,000,000,000
a year that we know about.
But my point is, 1,
anybody first, to make this point clear because
I know it's going around with Kamala Harris
too.
If there's a person who's here illegally,
however whatever the context, yeah, tactically, that makes
them criminal because they're breaking the law. But
how it's being framed
is that these people are rapists and murderers,
and they're all criminals. Well, it's obviously, there's
nuance there. Especially since on top of that,
which again, I don't agree with, they're waving
their magic wand and saying, I'm the president
or the vice president, and I'm saying you're
now legal.
And even though you may
vehemently disagree with that,
it's the same as Trump pardoning somebody with
a wave of his hand. So they can
do that. I don't find either legal, quite
frankly, but the reality is you that's just
how this works. And so they technically now
have made them legal in some cases, but
there's a whole lot of undocumented immigrants which
are breaking the law
that are criminals
in the genuine sense of the word. But
most of those people,
as far as I can tell in my
experience and my research, are just families,
random people who are struggling
largely because of US foreign policy. Just like
we're gonna talk about later in regard to
Lebanon or anywhere else, where they are millions
of people are flooding into Europe and the
United States, and 30 seconds from now, you're
gonna hear them blame them as the problem
despite the fact this is exactly what your
government has funded, both sides of it. But
I just wanna point that out, that this
is the number and the hype about this
point is very partisan.
But that's up that's your prerogative to think
to care about one more than the other.
But the numbers I also know are very
much manipulated.
My opinion is that we should care more
about the reality of illegal ongoing wars, whether
Ukraine or Israel or anything. And by the
way, this is a point I think I
have it right here.
Yeah. I'll get to it in a second.
I it's it's about logical consistency
about whether it's money for Lebanon or Gaza
or Ukraine or Israel. Right? If we're gonna
gripe about 1,
then all of them should matter. And also
I'll get to it in a second. But
so this this person does the same thing,
showing you this.
And this is an this is an important
point
because it's very obvious to see that they
give people in North Carolina and other suffering
areas $750
or whatever ultimately amounts to because it's probably
not even that.
And,
of course, the point from seemingly
the republican side of this conversation will weirdly
make this point only about Ukraine and just
omit Israel as always.
But just just again, it's it's a it's
a level of dishonesty.
Now that that's not that's I shouldn't say
dishonesty because, again, they can care about one,
not the other. But my point is it's
not logically consistent.
Because it's really not about what one you
believe in. Right? It's about the fact that
we're spending money on foreign ended conversations or
agendas than Americans.
So if you were like, okay. I'm good
with Israel, but not Ukraine. That means that
you care more about Israel than the people
in North Carolina.
Just be honest about that. But you don't
wanna say that because that challenges this point.
But you see, there's that see, I I
would I would argue that's dishonesty.
Plain and simple. But to the number he's
pointing out, it's actually check this is it's
crazy to think about how much money is
going to a Neo Nazi government that, by
the way, is funded and operated through Israel
and United States. So this is also Israel,
by the way. Congressionally approved Ukraine aid totals
a $175,000,000,000.
I mean, even just the general point of
how many Americans are struggling in this country,
can't find food in certain time, can't find
employment, can't find homes.
Now it shouldn't be that we just it
was, you know, charity in any sense that
people just get that, you know, republicans would
call it socialism, but the point is that
average people who are suffering in this country,
whether because of a storm or because of
just other circumstances,
and we're putting a $175,000,000,000
into the hand of one of the most
illegitimate criminal entities in the planet.
And at the time, half of this time
period, it's actually illegal for them to do
so, just like it's illegal for them to
fund Israel because of many laws, international and
domestic. So that's wild in and of itself.
But it needs to apply more than just
this one location.
But I just want and, again, I wanna
restress the point
that
the Azov movement, which, again, despite all the
narratives,
is the leading entity. It's part of the
government. It's part of the it is the
police force in most cases. They are driving
the bus. They are funded by Israel
and the United States.
This is just the article I intend to
show because it's easy to digest. It's from
2018
where a group
or rights groups, probably Beth Salem, I'm guessing.
That doesn't matter. Rights groups
are saying they demand Israel stop arming Neo
Nazis, and they're talking about the Azov movement.
Azov militia right there.
And, again, if you understand this, if you
followed our work, this is not just a
little casual funding. They created this group with
the united with the CIA, really, going back
a long way. Or you could argue the
CIA created it and Israel has been using
it however you wanna look at it, but
they are a part of this. So when
you're funding a $175,000,000,000
to Ukraine, you're also funding Israel's agenda. That's
important to recognize. But here's the point that,
Jason put out a clip about my conversation
about that point about $750
and funding. But he points out the contradiction.
He says the right has been quick to
call out the hypocrisy of sending 1,000,000,000 to
Ukraine while offering 750 to Americans
yet oddly silent when it comes to 1,000,000,000
sent to Israel. Why the double standard? Well,
you all know. But that's not what I
wanted to show you this for. This was
the point.
This person points out, we cannot ignore and
I my personal opinion that she's coming at
this with good intention.
We cannot ignore
ignore some more sinister connections. Like that Black
Rock through Albemarle
is opening lithium mines. That's not true.
It's just not. Now you could argue that
Black Rock is the one pulling all the
strings. It's certainly possible.
But the point is this is not the
way you would present that information. And, of
course, it shows the thing I showed you
on the show last time, BlackRock strategic acquisition.
But if you read it like this, you
don't know the amount.
It's a small percentage
In in a in a well, I'll show
you the actual information.
This one
receives $90,000,000.
Auburn see, how this tends to work in
the the the quick to
the mind of, like, I would say the
partisan perspective.
Is that you see this. Actually, you know
what? I don't think I grabbed it. This
was rumble. What was it? I think it
was 8 oh, yeah. So I wrote it
right here. BlackRock had 8.4%
of shares,
which is on the higher end of others
that own something, and you could argue that
has the influence. Right? But my point is
always, I'll come back to, is that, okay.
Well, then if we're being logically consistent, would
you care that
BlackRock and Vanguard have a combined, what is
it, 9%
of Rumble?
Well, if one matters and one doesn't, then
maybe we should reflect on what that means.
But my point is that if one matters,
then all should matter. And there's plenty of
examples where people would gripe about how well
just because they have shares doesn't mean they
control anything when it comes to partisan things
they agree with.
How much you wanna bet there's things like
this behind you in Twitter?
That's my personal opinion. We've seen a lot
of these things but there are still some
that we don't see. And also, let's let's
not forget the whole p Diddy overlap. He's
one of the owners and it seems like
none of the conversation of the right who
have been all about highlighting any overlap of
child sex trafficking, pedophilia, suddenly just don't care
to point out pit deep. Elon and p
Diddy,
logical inconsistency. That's usually how that works. But
my point was this saying Albemarle receives $90,000,000
from from the Department of Defense to boost
lithium in production. Well, that's important, but that's
not the same as saying that the US
government this is the US government
driving this my by the way, I look
at this is this as our government
going after the lithium. Now that's all
far more of a valid reason to wonder
whether they could've taken advantage of what just
happened because of that, which is a very
important fact.
But it does not immediately prove the connection
that we're making here. Right? The first of
all, just about BlackRock. So I said I
went over all this in the show. BlackRock
has 8.4%
of shares of that company. The company is
on track to be to open those mines
in 2026.
That point me simply pointing out that right
now,
other than the idea that, well, they could
reduce the amount they might have to pay
for certain things or land or whatever else,
that they would you know, it it just
it could be it's it's always a possibility,
but it just doesn't connect in all the
ways it needs to.
On top of the fact that realize they
already basically have all this stuff. So unless
if the argument is ultimately they just wanna
get it done quicker,
I would argue this and that. This point
doesn't even make that case. In fact, this
is gonna probably delay what they wanna accomplish.
Think about that for a second. But it
says, all still very important, but largely being
misrepresented right now. And I said, don't forget,
BlackRock and Vanguard are owned almost 9% of
Rumble. And this person says, that would be
great if you had some proof. And this
is the funny thing to me. Is I'm
not trying to maybe they shouldn't see it,
but I'm like, proof. It's available info. It's
out there. Many of us have pointed to
this often. And I said to me, if
one matters, they all do, which is my
opinion. But don't expect any of those invested
in any way in Rumble, you know who
they all are, to care or acknowledge that
while they'll point at anything,
any shadow that has anything even tangentially connected
with Rumble or BlackRock or BlackRock and Vanguard.
But not now. I said that should matter
to objective people.
This person says they own that amount of
all public listed companies. He's making a good
point. Not all, but a lot.
I'd imagine, he says, due to the size
of the assets under management within their funds.
They're just so damned big, he says, if
they own a piece of everyone. It's a
fair point. As I said, it's a fair
point. I wasn't saying this proves anything,
either side, rumble or Albemarle.
Only that we need to be consistent with
our logic. If it matters, it can if
if companies are caught up in the the
ice
this is funny. I said, if it matters
in in companies
that are caught up in the I support
the current thing of the right, because it
goes both ways, then it should matter for
the platform many of them use.
Now I mean that, by the way. It's
funny how we see the woke right more
than ever right now, and it's the same
damn thing. There's a thing that they all
get hyped on. And sometimes, like I said,
it's real stuff that matters at the core,
but becomes this hyperbolic,
cartoonish discussion after that.
That's their I support the current thing. They
may not put flags in their bios, but
you see it trickle through everybody's conference. There's
a reason for that. And I'm not talking
about just covering the news.
You know what I mean? So it's the
same thing. I support the current thing. It's
all it's it's partisanship.
But overall, that's the point I want you
to think about, is that we're talking about
consistency and logic.
And I think we all know that's not
really taking place. Now please watch this documentary
because it really does break down the shocking
malfeasance. People should be in jail for what's
happening. Whether it's because your tax dollars are
not going to help the people,
it's going overseas to war while they're struggling.
And as the woman points out in the
documentary, as you guys all know by now,
4 days go by and no one's even
talking about what they're dealing with.
As as she highlights, people are be as
we already highlighted in the past show. And
it goes back long before this one event,
long before multiple left and right administrations. But
it's the same conversation that they will turn
away donations if they're not the right groups.
Right? Or they will tell you you're not
allowed to help while nobody else is helping.
It's I don't care if you wanna talk
about liability or whatever else. It doesn't matter.
I am beyond this BS. It's about your
it's about human compassion.
Right? The the need to help people in
need.
I don't care whether you've got some red
tape bureaucracy that says I'm not allowed to.
I don't care. I'm done caring about the
kind of criminal like, so for the they're
telling us we can't go help people right
now while they're blindly supporting genocide. I don't
care what they have to say. I'm done
with that.
But as she points out here in a
past example, just what I had saved here,
back in Katrina,
there were 25,000 active duty troops that were
in the region right before this, or technically
right after, they deployed some of these people
in this area to the Middle East.
And on top of that, her point is
ultimately where what what else are they doing?
Why is nobody helping with the troops that
were available? It's wild. Watch this, and there's
part 2 coming out.
Now I wanna show you a couple other
clips that I think are important just to
show you that real point.
Here's a person who verifies his identity, shows
his bat his YouTube channel on his truck
so you could verify that he is the
person he's saying it is, which I find
important right now. That's also what happens is
right? You we all know this. In any
conversation,
especially when it becomes hyper partisan,
which everything seems to these days, you get
people that will lie.
Maybe because they think that lie will help
people in North Carolina or whatever else. That's
not this. This guy's telling you something important.
But we know that exists, which is why
it's important to be skeptical.
Because people could stand up in front of
a local community government and say, this is
happening or they're eating the ducks. You know?
Well, how these things work. And maybe they
thought that. Or maybe they're lying because they
wanted a healthy agenda. Maybe they don't like
the you see? But my point is we
know that exists. We saw it with with
a whole anti
semitism fiasco
where every other day somebody was being caught
lying about manufacturing some anti semitic attack. And
that doesn't mean that that anti semitism is
false or that those attacks never happened in
some case. But it meant that more of
them than not were being lied about. And
I think too many people in the partisan
sphere are willing to jump out there and
just tell you what they want you to
think.
I I honestly think that errs at most
of them on the side of doing what
they want. They're they think they're gonna help.
I think that by counteracting the democrat lie
that's in with another lie that they can
win, you see where that goes. And if
you're listening and you do that,
you're part of the problem whether you realize
it or not.
And you're honestly part of a larger problem
that has not 2 party it's a 2
party illusion. It's about creating
inconsistency, muddying the waters. Right? If if you
can't if everything is false all the time,
then you I mean and like I said,
it's always a combination in 1984 and Brave
New World. That's literally where we are right
now. So check this guy out telling you
how they're not letting these people help. And
not only that, that these are people that
are truck driving trucks. He's telling you based
on the fact that he's looking at the
trucking,
what do you call it? You know, where
you can look to see the available jobs.
And even right there, question whether he might
be lying about that. I don't think so.
My gut tells me he's telling you the
truth, but that's where we have to be
right now. That they're not allowing even trucks
to cut nobody's shipping anything in. And they've
got things to be shipped in. And I
get it. With the roads and the TrueStream
Media does a great job breaking this down.
The roads and everything else, it actually is
kinda crazy. Like, the how fast this happened
and the fact that it's never happened like
this before is one more reason why I'm
like, okay. The weather aspect is something we
very much need to consider.
But the point is that there's also a
level of this where you kinda go, yeah,
it is actually that difficult.
And I'm not trying to give anybody a
pass because my opinion was already stated. But
at some level, there is, can't just be
all in one direction. And it we have
to be objective and there's nuance here. Right?
So listen to what he's saying.
People in North Carolina,
you deserve to hear this.
I'm a truck driver. Alright?
I have a 53 foot step deck. I've
been trucking for about two and a half
years. I have a YouTube channel you can
verify that on. Baby line hotshot.
Usually,
in a disastrous situation,
it is payday for truckers.
We look for that hurricane. We look for
that ice storm. There's generators coming to you.
There from, there's stuff coming out of military
bases. There is excavators,
skid steers, bulldozers,
tree tree trimming equipment, pumps,
like water pumps to pump water out of
places that have been flooded.
There's no loads
on the load board coming to you within
a 125
miles
of Asheville.
It's called truck stop. This is where I
find all my loads. Chicago, Illinois up at
the top. Within 250 miles of Chicago is
where I'm gonna pick up. The second
the second is the, destination. So it goes
origin destination. Watch. See? Drop off location.
Let's do
city.
North Carolina.
Click it. Boom.
Alright.
These are all a dollar 40 a mile
loads, a dollar 39.
That was posted yesterday.
I mean, there's nothing.
I mean and look. Even if you think
that that's simply due to the roads being
inoperable, which is an obviously valid point, or
anything else.
The point that everybody is making is that
there in in the documentary from truthy's me
truthy media, there there's
private helicopter pilots who are do who are
actually helping, but they're stopping them, who are
trying to save people, or what about the
drones or any number of things? They just
aren't there's no there's no logical reason why
that stuff's not being used. Now, as of
right now, maybe it is. But last I
checked, these things were not there and this
has been days where people have been suffering.
I mean, literally, people are dying. Now I
in regard to because of the lack of
help is that's hard to tell right now.
But I guarantee
there have been people in positions where they
could have saved them had they done something
before now.
That's I think that's an obvious point to
make. Now you can decide
how in justifiable
actions. But for me,
I mean, it's it's it's like these are
what these are what these groups are there
for or at least as we're told. And
every time these days, whether it's a disaster
like this or some kind of a medical
conversation or siege whatever we're talking about, they
continually
prove themselves to be more in line with
their own protection
and some other government agenda than ever doing
what they even pretend their job is.
Everywhere.
And I know we all see that. That's
not some hyperbolic conspiracy theory. It's obvious, and
we keep seeing it. Now the real question
is why. Now right now, the partisan game
is to point to the other side. But
if we have a brain, we can see
that it goes back long before
or over multiple administrations. So it's not a
partisan game because guess what?
There is no partisan. It's just your government
guys. And they don't care about you.
There's nothing. These are loads that that you
you wouldn't even nobody's taking them. They're just
on the load board. They've been on there
since yesterday. You can see. Right? Let's type
in a different city.
That's from Chicago.
Let let maybe Tennessee. Maybe Nashville is closer,
and they'd they'd send resources from Nashville, Tennessee.
Nashville, Tennessee within 250 miles of Nashville
to Asheville,
North Carolina within a 125
miles.
Let's see. There is that's it. That's all
the loads. That's all the loads that are
£28,000
in I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but
I mean, what the hell is going on
here? I had brokers call me and tell
me, Stu, have you seen any loads going
to Asheville or, like, anywhere around the Carolinas,
South Carolina,
Georgia?
Is there any, like, FEMA loads?
There's none.
0.
He's been a broker for 6 years,
and he's talking to other brokers. They're saying
the same thing. What's going on, guys?
Yeah. God, I hate that stupid thing at
the end. Now, you know, another question we
should be asking or just something to be
objective. Right? I mean, as always,
like I said, with eve Trump's situation, everything
we've gone through, you know, the point like,
it was during Trump shooting, I made the
point more clear more
commonly,
is that, you know, tomorrow, there may be
something that pops up that suddenly makes it
all make sense. Now I'm gonna play a
clip as it's it's it hilariously enough was
posted by Elon Musk in a minute.
The point is that we all have confirmation
bias.
And so one of the things she talks
about is the idea that we just people
tend to stick with the first thing they
learn, and they don't wanna move away from
it.
That is part of the partisan game, and
that's what they trap you in. My point
is that tomorrow, there is some very easily
verifiable narrative that explains why even if you
just then we need to continue to evolve
with the information. I'm not saying blindly trust
what they tell you that justifies their lie.
But prove things. Do your due diligence. And
if you can't prove it, then you wait.
We just have to start being better than
the corporate media. The mainstream alternative media today
is almost worse than the corporate media and
we have to start being better if we
actually wanna change something. So to me, this
is important because it shows you that they're
ultimately not bringing anything in or trying to.
But, again, maybe there's another website, maybe there's
other tracks. My thing is why aren't they
using the other readily available things?
I don't know. I mean, I find that
actually pretty I mean, obviously crazy because it
demonstrates
I mean, I don't even know the right
way to frame it. Is it that they
don't care about us? Is it they that
they're trying to exacerbate the problem to use
it for another agenda? Whatever it is, I
think we recognize that this is not how
we're told it's supposed to go. And that
should matter to everybody, whether whatever partisan side
your honor are seeing through it all. Now
fox foxy farmer put out some clips
simply showing this. She says I've been,
I'm assuming that this person has been totally
focused on North Carolina, they say. But Erwin,
Texas or Tennessee
apparently is
damp very destroyed.
And it says the entire topo, topography of
the region has changed. The post that This
is according to them anyway. And the post
of information in the comments, but look at
this stuff. So it's important to think about
why
the only foe I mean, or obviously North
Carolina, the conversation's a lithium mine and and
that. But it's interesting that that gets all
the focus. Right?
I mean, I'm willing to bet you could
find something in Erwin that would be like,
oh, maybe that's why they destroyed it for
this era. And you see, you could spin
out into some hypothetical and maybe it is
the truth.
But it's important to recognize that this is
not about one thing and one narrative. That's
my point from the beginning. It's about the
malfeasance,
the lack of helping people in North Carolina
is obviously in a much more precarious situation.
But in general, that's what we should be
caring about, the lack of use
of your tax dollars to help people in
need.
She also points out this is Tase Farmer
Irwin. How the hell do they even rebuild
this? And how is it even real?
It's just sad. Just showing you all the
it's all busted up and broken, which is
sad.
Now, lastly, in a point just in
same general point in general, about the partisan
game. This person puts out a very important
post,
saying urgent call to action. Of course, this
is my this is what I'm making a
point about. Stop the Biden Harris Forestry Service.
But it goes on to make an excellent
point about, just to sum it up in
general, about them labeling their cattle
as what's the word they use? I, it
unpermitted, unbranded,
And just because of bureaucracy and red tape.
And whatever you think about the legitimacy of
why you need to do what the government
tells you with your livestock, whether that's vaccines
or branding or whatever else, the you know,
the point is that it really does come
down to a point of freedom, of liberty.
And to me,
it's
unconstitutional.
Right? The whether we're talking about the forestry
service or the Bureau of Land Management in
general, we're talking about an illegitimate
unconstitutional
entity.
Realize they own land. The federal government should
not be owning land. That is the federal
government, my opinion, in general should not exist.
Gen well, actually, if you know my me
well enough, you think I you know, I
don't think any of us should. But in
a just a constitutional
sense, the federal government in and of itself
was something that the founding fathers did not
well, some of them did, but many of
them pushed back and that's why it started
the way it did. I think we've rapidly
lost it quickly. But the point is, she's
calling out this idea this point that they're
saying we're gonna
take
I mean, it it brings to mind like,
blank on the name.
The, you know, the the ranch. The important
story that we you know, the the Bundy
ranch. So because that overlapped with the I
the idea of the cattle concept. That's where
it really started. And then the the it's
just it was pretty much a similar conversation
about the Bureau of Land Management. In a
in anyway, to sum it up, the point
is this is a part this is a
very important conversation, where they're trying to seize
their land, seize their cattle based on this
idea, or kill them should they not do
what they're told. And to me, it's just
more overreach of the US government. My point
was that this is a very important story.
But, like, a lot of topics that are
suddenly everywhere in the partisan sphere right now,
not to imply this one, but just things
that we see that just all of a
sudden are all over all the big partisan
channels,
it's not unique to the Biden administration as
history easily shows.
This is simply the illegal nature of the
federal government, all sides of it. So I
just wanna make that point. Just check this
story out. It's crazy. But let's realize it's
not just Biden's administration. It's been going on
a long time. This is one step after
another.
Now, one other point I wanted to make
about that overlap
of
the
hurricane Helane story.
And then I'll come back to this. This
is not why I'm showing you. This is
just what it came off of and it's
a point about Anthony Blinken acting like we're
gonna help the people suffering in Lebanon. It's
like we usually like you're just randomly suffering.
Like these you're paying for that to happen
and then paying to help. It's ridiculous.
But Indiana says,
f them, and I guess, Lebanon.
Innocent Lebanese civilians being murdered by your tax
dollars. But, you know, f them
over there.
And they say, we have a war going
on right now in America, which I don't
necessarily disagree with. But it's not
it's a point I did with Dan. Like,
from a human perspective, objectively, what's going on
in the Middle East is far more important
in a world human sense than anything else
I'm seeing. But that you're you can make
your own decision. From an American perspective, yes.
I agree. That's why I'm talking about this.
What's happening here? That's why I'm starting with
the 2 party illusion and all this before
we even get to the Middle East because
I do agree, from an American perspective,
that that's important.
But I just don't know how we can
pretend, especially since our tax dollars and our
weapons and your government is funding and
a part of this is not a side
thing. Your government
is committing genocide,
and we're acting like it's that's not that's
less important. It seems wild to me that
anybody could have that perspective, but it's your
prerogative. But the point is you didn't notice
the attack on Florida. He's talking to me.
Georgia, Tennessee, North Carolina, etcetera. And they're about
to attack Florida again, which I guess, you
know, weather is gonna be just their attack.
All that's see, all of a sudden, it
becomes any storm is now manufactured, which certainly
could be, but the assumption is my point.
But it says wake the f up, vagabond.
Okay.
And I said, well, maybe you should pay
better attention.
Posting the show where I literally just talked
about it 2 days ago, about North Carolina.
And I said, if I can care about
both and discuss both, so can anyone.
Your deflection is actually the problem.
100% mean that.
First of all, this person, I don't even
think, cares that I wasn't covering it. They
don't like that I'm covering Israel and Palestine
and Lebanon. That's my gut instinct, but you
can decide for yourself. Same thing I see
happen to Kim all the time where they
go, you're only talking about this. No. She's
not. She's just not. And you're saying that
because I think you're deflecting from the reality.
Like, my point is, how come you never
wanna talk about this? I'm talking about a
lot of stuff. So I find it interesting.
So first, they're pretending either they don't know
or they're pretending they don't know.
And I think what the real thing is
you're trying to deflect from this story. We
should care about all of it. It's all
relevant. Both for Americans, but just from a
world view as well.
That's important to think
about. Same thing here. Sarah Abdallah,
oh, yeah. Yeah. Sarah Abdallah points out the
bombing in Beirut we'll come back to. This
is also from yesterday.
This person says, who gives an s h
I t? Go, Phils. Like some, you know,
go your fill Philadelphia, whatever he's talking about
for a sports conversation. I don't know if
he means the Eagles or what. But the
point is, that's what he's talking about. And
maybe I mean, Fills what? Baseball? I don't
know. Doesn't matter. Care less and less about
sports today. I only really ever cared about
football in the day back in the day.
But here is somebody going, who cares? Well,
fine. You know, you have a right to
do that. You cannot care.
But who?
Most everyone in the world.
So I find it interesting that you're getting
a lot of this kind of American pushback
on why should we even care? I don't
think it's real. I think these are bots,
primarily Zionist bots, that are trying to get
you to look anywhere else. So I was
like, look look at this guy. And I've
done this so many times. I've never shown
you guys so I don't wanna waste the
time. I mean, I should have because now
the other ones I've seen in the past
were far more obvious where you go back
and you can see when they were created.
You can see what they've been following. These
are Israeli bots. It I mean, it's undeniable,
and I'll make that more in in a
second. But this this one, you can decide
for yourself. With a, I met the ones
I was talking about in the past. You
can go back and see that his last
comment, which is just right here,
is or the the earliest comment is 2020.
That I mean, so that's comment, reply, anything.
And that's despite the fact oops. Let me
just go to it right here. Despite the
fact that it was created in 2015.
So you just got which is certainly possible,
but he created it in 2015 and didn't
do literally anything. Not a like, not a
reply, not until 2,020.
That doesn't seem likely.
Oh, this person now follows me. That's funny.
I wonder why. But the point
is that this
is an account if you look through the
information
that is following
Where are we? Here we go.
If you look through it,
a lot of the people you might expect,
but some of you might not. But anyway,
my bottom bottom line point is that this
is account that is if you look through
what they're saying and what they're sharing, it's
all very clear in one direction.
And I think what we're seeing is the
idea that people are coming in trying to
deflect from what is
obviously,
from a worldwide perspective,
the story. I just think that needs to
be very obvious to us all. And then
as we'll get into next or next after
this next segment,
the overlap of censorship, the the free speech
under attack from both sides, just your government,
and how right now on Twitter
actively playing a part in this.
So we just had before we get to
that,
I thought it was important to highlight that
because I genuinely think this is a driving
force behind what we're dealing with right now.
I had a really great interview with Dan
Cohen. 2nd one we've had in about a
couple months. Last one we talked about was
Haiti with Kim Ives. It was really great
conversation. This one was called the manufactured Middle
East plight and the Zionist linchpin.
Great conversation. I hope you will check it
out. One of the main things we get
into, we talk about politics to start the
election. We talk about a bunch of different
things. But we we end up, like, we
go over Syria and Lebanon and Iran. The
point is that at the end, the latter
half is really about the Zionist linchpin. Now
Dan is a Jewish he's a Jew himself.
And he and he has been going he's
been talking about this
really since the start I mean, I think
if you look back at his work, he's
covered this in the past. But since October
7th, and we talk about it on the
show. Like, same with a lot of people.
I had, like, a really evolving you know,
and myself included, by the way. Like, I've
been covering this in general, but this conversation
has really
blossomed the understanding of what Zionism truly is.
So it was a very powerful conversation. I
greatly respect Dan. Where he's breaking this down
as a Jewish person and telling you the
lie of Zionism. How they are using Jewish
people. Which I a 100% agree with.
But it's important to see it from that
perspective. And I think it's a growing understanding
of Jews in the world. And that's why
we're seeing this decline of who Zionism is.
And this desperate kind of death row right
now, this dying grasp,
gasp
of just desperation, just
screaming
atrocity propaganda. Like, it's it's
conspicuous.
So let's go over those points to make
sure you understand that point. Make sure you
watch the doc the the the interview. But
Johnny Graz here points this out saying, any
hate directed at Jews, and this is his
opinion, but life largely agree with this, has
either been purposely engineered by the Zionist
entity in Palestine or made up out of
full cloth.
Israel knows their entire existence depends on the
continuation of antisemitism.
It's why they worked so hard to create
it. Now there's a lot of highly educated
academics and researchers and journalists, all of which
are Jewish, who are saying this.
And it's not that there's no antisemitism,
guys. Yes, there is. My opinion is it
would be about the same amount that we
would see in any other category, save for
what Zionism is creating.
And part of that is people that are
out there screaming about Hitler was right and
all this stuff that is ridiculous.
They are the whether they're doing it inadvertently
or by deliberate deliberately,
they are at they're they are the zai
they're being used by Zionism.
They're tricking people into a position which creates
the very anti semitism they which again, you
know my the point about semites and Palestinians.
It's about what they the word they use,
but the racism they're in that they need
to justify their existence.
Assuming that they don't just get destroyed in
any case because of their ongoing genocides. But
this is what he highlights.
This person saying, I cannot imagine
what the last year has been like for
Jewish people around the world. Well, it's amazing
to make that statement while it's undeniable the
amount of suffering and death and murder and
rape and pillaging is exponentially
or that's the wrong use of the word.
Far more on the side of Palestinians.
That's not up for debate. Whether or not
you're more outraged about one day where Israel's
been shown to be a part of, I
think, the majority of the death,
or the ongoing 100 of thousands of suffering
and death and rape and murder that's been
going on ever since. That's I mean, that
says a lot about you, to be honest.
One matters more than the other. That clearly
is a level of either way.
A a human being would care about both.
And they would acknowledge the facts of both,
even if they're uncomfortable.
But the point is what it is. It
it I didn't read it all. Just I
I I and I don't profess to, but
witnessing the blatant and purposeful, hateful, disgusting anti
Semitism on it's the same argument.
The dark looming cloud of anti Semitism. No.
You're talking about Palestinian events that the ADL
claimed were anti Semitism because they are part
of an agenda.
And that's that's been proven even by corporate
media. Every Palestinian event, whether whether violent or
anything else, were just labeled as antisemitism, and
that's why we got the 400% spike. And
all of these people, all of them, the
Ben Shapiro's,
the Rabbi Shmueli's, they all know they're lying.
And that has to be clear to people.
It's not an opinion. These are basic, provable
facts and they just lie anyway.
Lie about Human Shield. Lie about everything they're
doing to justify
murder.
This has to hang over them forever.
Here is what honest people are saying. This
is Avi shalom, shlaim, shlom. I I think
I've heard it pronounced both. I think shlom.
He's a Jewish person himself. He's a highly
respected academic from he's an Israeli.
And he is been saying this his entire
career.
That as he says, as Rania writes, Israel
neither represents Jews nor true Judaism.
It represents pure evil.
Now look. You can disagree with that. But
this game we play where it's somehow racist,
when you have very clear prominent Jewish people
in the world, or
writers from Haaretz, like Gideon Levy, who are
screaming about this reality. You can't keep pretending
that it's only one way. The truth, I
think, is quite obvious, and I think most
people see it today. Response
has
violated
every
item in international
humanitarian
law.
So as a Jew, I feel deeply ashamed
and angry about what Israel is doing,
and
I'm appalled
that they,
speak,
as Jews,
particularly
the religious
nationalists,
the religious Zionists within the government, like Bezalel,
Smotrich,
and, Itamar
Ben Gur. They see themselves as Jews, and
they speak in the name of Jews, but
they have nothing in in common with me.
And, I'm
I'm not a practicing Jew,
but I'm proud of my Jewish heritage,
and I'm equally proud of my Arab heritage.
And I know that
the four
core values
of Judaism,
altruism,
truth,
justice,
and peace.
And the the Israeli government today
is the antithesis
of these core values.
Now here's the point to make.
There are there are those out there who
right now are trying to convince you that
any Jewish person is the problem.
That that's what Zionism wants. My point would
be simple.
A person like this who has spent their
entire life
making this point or and plenty of other
very excellent and insightful academic points,
what's the argument there? Is he the anomaly?
Or is he secretly his entire career? I
mean, certainly, those are all possible.
But I think we need to stand back
and recognize how hollow or really just as
a basic point of logic that any broad
stroke is usually ignorant. I would say always.
There's I mean, in any concept, whether mathematical
or just human, there's never a 100%. There's
always a there's always something that go there's
the anomaly. There's always the deviation.
And I think, obviously,
we're talking about something that is provably not
the case. That there's all and you and
even look. Here let me put it this
way.
If you're the one arguing that, could you
have to at least acknowledge that there are
people like, let's just even say you think
that the the the Torah or or the
or the,
the, it's blank on the other one. Just
it the the the Jewish religious text
are evil. If let's just say you think
that. And you then it your point would
have to be that you then they at
least misunderstand it. Right?
Like, because that's possible, isn't it? That they
read it and don't think that that's the
case? My point is that to become just
so blunt about it and say they are
bad because they're Jewish
is the most clumsy, obvious manipulation.
Simple.
But I I I I I agree with
what he's saying. And I think it's the
same thing we see with the the bible
or anything else or the or the Quran.
That, yes, you can find things in there
that are archaic and there is wild stuff
in the bible. Very crazy, extreme things. And
we just we just go, oh, well, it's
a it's a parable. Oh, you know, it's
oh, we don't we don't do that anymore.
Okay. Well,
yet some people do and you can prove
that. So it's the same game they play
and all these ridiculous, cartoonish people out there
making it out to be just Islam.
Any Muslim is a problem. They're just they're
disgusting.
Small, uneducated people or deliberate
deceivers for Zionism.
Because the reality is that they're all, like,
there are good people in any category, and
there are bad people. And any that's always
the way this works.
I think it's obvious what Zionism is doing.
Now here, to make this point even more
clear, is what you'll see Zionists do to
Jewish people if they speak out about Zionism.
As Solomon Ahmed points out, this is antisemitism.
Rav Rabbi Dovid Feldman was attacked by a
Zionist in New York. The rabbi was attacked
by a Zionist because he is on the
side of the Palestinians and the Lebanese people.
Rabbi Dovid Feldman was threatened for being anti
Zionist, anti Israel, and for supporting Palestine and
Lebanon.
Zionism is not Judaism.
Now, again, you could presold, he's just the
only one. No. It's a very obvious growing
it's been there for a long time, by
the way. Goes back to the origin of
the illegal state of Israel. There were people
there was a huge movement back then to
say that wasn't the case. There were Jewish
people that were pointing out what they were
doing to Palestinians was not in line with
Judaism, and they just ignored or shut them
down or attacked them too. It's we've talked
about all of this. The reality to see
though is that this is what a lot
of Jewish people think. And even if you
think it's the minority, it exists. So we
can't keep pretending that all this or all
that. That's just ignorance. That's what you're gonna
hear from all the Ben Shapiro's of the
world.
3 US trade deal.
Go
to
Gaza. Go.
They want you in Gaza. Why you don't
go to Gaza?
Why you don't go to Gaza? Why you
don't go to Gaza? Why you don't go
Why you don't go to Gaza? Why you
don't go to Gaza? Why you don't go
to Gaza? Why you don't go to Gaza?
Why you don't go to Gaza? So he's
screaming, why don't you go to Gaza? Which
for frankly, I think many of these people
I I I I it's hard to see
this either today. I think this is one
of the guys from Torah Judaism group that
I've referenced in the past that have been
there. Not necessarily in Gaza, but large West
Bank and so on, but understand the plight
and dynamic. But, nonetheless,
this is how he responds to an orthodox
Jewish,
rabbi.
Why don't you go to Gaza?
I mean,
objectively,
he represents more Jewish
identity and values than than you standing there
in your suit in New York.
But I you could be wrong, for all
we know. The point is you can't see
because of someone's attire whether they're more Jewish
or more Christian. But the point is the
same, that you're speaking to an orthodox rabbi
and saying he's not you should just go
join them because you don't believe in Israel.
Well, that's the whole point. You don't need
to be an Israeli to be an orthodox
Jew, or to be Jewish in general, or
believe in Zionism.
Those things are fundamentally
different than Judaism.
In fact, they're the honestly, the antithesis of
Judaism and we're trying to expose that today.
You are the
best people in the world. You are the
best people in the world. You are
the
best people in the world. And you're, you
know, whatever the derogatory term was.
See, so so he's no longer part of
the best people in the world because you
see my point? He's speaking about Zionists.
And they're not the best people in the
world. Quite the opposite. You are good. You
are good. Amalek. The world is the only
Amalek, I think it's one of these prophetic
kind of end times terms. Why you don't
go to Gaza? Why you don't go to
Gaza? Go to Gaza. Go to Gaza. Yeah.
See, that's what I thought. He did visit
Gaza. So the guy doesn't even care. Doesn't
matter. He's telling what he means by that
is don't not calling out that you don't
know what you're talking about. He's saying, go
kill yourself or go
Where where you you know, you it's just
it's so transparent.
You realize that again, the reality of the
origin of this we've talked about in the
past, Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, was
an atheist. And in fact, as Dan Cohen
himself discusses, one of the things that the
text they're referencing,
forget the name of it. It was something
it's very publicized. It's very, you know, documented
thing.
Not the not the protocol conversation, but something
else that they I forget the name of
it. Damn it. I can't remember now. The
point is that it's widely regarded as just
aggressively anti semitic or just
anti Jewish.
And his point was that they Dan makes
this point very well that the idea was
to sort of change them in order to
avoid that or whatever the narrative was. But
nonetheless, founded by a person who's an open
atheist
and detested Jewish people. It's just ridiculous.
But this guy is demonstrating that pretty clear.
Don't fight it to Jewish people. You are
not represented. Go to Gaza. You are not
Jewish. You are not Jewish. Judaism is not
about the race.
You are a is suffering. I'm a Everyone
is suffering. Palestinians,
Lebanese, Jews, everybody is suffering because of your
wicked state of Israel.
Pretty clear.
Here's another one. Khaleesi points this out. This
is a
this just simply says how Zionist treat people
of the Jewish faith.
Entities or rabbis in some cases.
Khaleesi also points this out. This is one
that I really wanted you guys to see.
One example,
but it is everywhere, and it overlaps, which
you'll see in a minute, with the censorship
conversation.
Because a statement like this on Twitter is
only
may violate the rules.
Limited visibility. And we'll get to a moment
where doom, in our chat, was recently suspended
for a lot for weeks because of something
far, far less than that. But it was
directed at somebody who we'll we'll get to
it in a second.
This, it says, is a Zionist mindset. The
account is still up, which I'll show you
next, and running as x claims it may
violate the rules.
So just to be clear, this is very
distasteful for the podcast. It's a horrible thing.
So maybe I let me see. Yeah. I
mean, I'm not even gonna pronounce this all
the way. So I just argue that your
children should not hear this or engage with
this.
Johnny, John Nike
says, in regard to this person who clear
this is by the way, Dave Eli David,
a disgusting human being,
shared something about this person glorifying this person
dying.
This person says
or or rather not dying but being, you
know, not ultimately be
I I we I looked this up earlier
Just trying to write off the top of
my head, the context. It's more important what
he says in response. But I believe it
was Eli David making a statement about this
person.
Anyway, he responds by saying, too bad she
died. No. I'll say, I did I did
I I thought I misread it. So kind
of glorifying the fact that this is, you
know, a terrorist being killed. And he says,
too bad she died. Would have loved to
see her little
cunt get raped like a b I t
c h before that.
Hashtag Lebanon.
This is new. This is not old.
Very look. And this is we're talk what
is that? 11 year old girl? 10 year
old girl?
Very real.
Here is what this guy said in many
other contexts.
Mohammed Smiri points this out about children being
killed.
And he says, don't look away.
He puts love it
with eye with googly eyes with hearts.
Suppressed News says, hey. He's real happy 6th
October anniversary.
John Nike says, with this same girl, by
the way,
died like dogs, hashtag Lebanon.
These children.
These
children.
Ma Hasuni,
Hussani says once again, the Israeli occupation is
ordering the remaining residents of Gaza City. This
is from the October 6th. This is from
today, actually.
And Northern Gaza to evacuate the Al Miwasi
area in southern Gaza. After forcibly displacing over
a 1000000 Palestinians from Gaza and remaining 300,000
are now under threat. We'll get to this
in a minute. Here's what he says.
Still alive, little c u n t?
This guy is on Twitter. Nobody care. They're
not censoring him. I mean, at worst, they're
giving him a little less visibility when he
threatens to rape somebody. A child, by the
way.
Doesn't that matter? Maybe maybe Diddy's influence on
Twitter might change a little more than we
think. Right? Here, Israel killed her father, this
person points out. There's a woman crying in
front of her dead father's body.
He puts 4 laughy faces.
These are the kind of people we're dealing
with, guys.
A beer.
Oh, the the so just so it's clear.
That is allowed on Twitter.
So keep that in mind as we get
into the censorship conversation and you get to
see an example of what is being censored.
Before that though, here's a this is somebody
we've already referenced in the past. Ever as
we're so we're coming up the segment of
Zionism, and that was a Zionist who was
telling you all the things you just saw.
Here is
a holocaust survivor
with a different opinion.
The holocaust survivors and descendants
are warmly welcomed by these great marches,
and we share our Palestinian marches. Solidarity with
the sufferings of the Palestinian people.
Yeah.
And so at the same time,
we oppose and disprove
the other false claim that these great marches
are no go areas for Jews.
See? Now, of course, he could be wrong.
Right? He could be misinformed. He could be
lying,
except for the fact that he's surrounded by
a whole lot of other Jews who said
the same thing. And we've shown you countless
videos of Jewish doctors, Jewish nurses, Jewish protesters,
just all of them saying the same thing.
Because we're being lied to. And that, by
the way, has easily been debunked and proven.
Or not given up, but proven. In a
1,000 different ways. Because we've already shown it
to you. So at some point, you just
have to acknowledge, which I think everybody already
has, that it's obvious.
And what the reason I say it like
that is that I genuinely think that, I
mean, there's always some people that are either
too lazy, don't wanna look, they just already
accepted a narrative, they don't wanna follow-up on
it, or, you know, just don't care.
But the by and large, I am convinced
that the vast majority of the planet
sees this 100%. And all we're dealing with
are politicians
who don't care or are invested in Zionism
or people that are invested for in Israel
for some other reason or just Zionist manipulators
online.
I think we all see that. If you
actually look at a lot of these posts
of the same people sharing this the same
lies, Elon Levy, you'll see a near identical
engagement with everything they do. So many 1,000
likes, so many 100 retweet, and it's saying
every time.
I think it's because that's the level of
their that's their influence campaign. And they share
and it's it's constantly obvious.
They're sharing things that have been proven to
be false a 100 times over, whether it's
about food aid. We'll get to all of
this.
But here is a holocaust survivor again telling
you that you're being lied to.
Finally,
a few words about the invisible pain
that is part of the suffering
in Gaza
that also resonates with my own Holocaust experience,
particularly with
the pain of having to make life or
death decisions
for one's family
in the dark
with no reliable information. Should we flee? Should
we stay? Should we trust the promises
of safe havens?
What should we do with family members who
are disabled
and cannot flee?
And this is how members of my own
family died in 1944
in Transylvania.
1 of them was disabled.
They couldn't leave him, and they all perished
in Auschwitz.
What is it like
to have to witness the instant destruction
of a home
built up over years?
To have to divide the family instantly in
an emergency
without any certainty of a reunion
ever.
Even as a 7 year old,
I witnessed all this
in the holocaust of World War 2.
And it is deeply upsetting to see all
this pain
cruelly repeated
in 2024
in Gaza
and the genocide
ceasefire now.
Free free Palestine.
Free
free Palestine. Oh. Oh, wait. Now is he
is he now a a Hamas terrorist supporter?
Is he a Hamas terrorist?
All of our congress would tell you that.
But guess what? They'll all cowardly step away
from this conversation the moment this gets brought
up. I always the the other video I
play, which you've seen, I don't think I
have it set up right now but it's
the same it's similar point in a different
conversation that he's played that he's right in
the beginning of this. Like, during the campus
protest when now all the hype about them
being racist that was going on, he spoke
up bravely
and said they're lying. I was there. They're
not. And the point is that I post
this video underneath people like Josh Holly and
and,
Tom Cowell or whatever, not Cowell.
That's that's the researcher and the scientist. What's
the Tom guy's name in the congress? Tom
Cotton.
You know? And I put I say so
they're calling everybody.
I'll show you in a minute. He's pointing
to the long lived defata. How dare you
not condemn this? The point is they're all
saying those things because it doesn't mean what
you what you pretend it does, you child.
And he knows that. He's being dishonest. He's
probably being paid to.
The bottom line is they would never dare
to say, oh, yeah. You're right. Based on
logic, he's a terrorist then. They wouldn't do
that because that challenge is something deeper that
they're using to manipulate everybody.
Here's another post from Torah Judaism simply saying
anti Zionist Jews protested in Jerusalem to demand
the release of Jews detained by Zionist prisons.
Israeli police intervened
harshly against the protesting Jews.
100 of anti Zionist Jews are detained under
harsh conditions in Israeli prisons. 100.
This is not a small thing.
Israel arrests Jews and puts them in prison
under harsh conditions
just because they're against Zionism in the state
of Israel.
When are we gonna start acknowledging this stuff?
Now last day on the port of Zionism,
doctor Sheba said this. This is from August
14th.
Trump and Musk are patriots.
Patriots of Zionism.
And he just simply highlights all the different
images of them hugging and holding the hands
of Netanyahu.
I I mean, I don't even think is
is
Elon Musk Is he Jewish? I don't even
think so. Anyway, the point here he is
praying with Ben Shapiro.
The point
is that obviously these people Now, now look,
you you can practice whatever you want. I
don't care if Elon is a Jewish person
or if he wants to believe in Judaism
or my point is about Zionism. And what
Israel and the government commit genocide is influencing.
Obviously, both of them. There's no question in
my mind. But I wanted to show you
this only because I just reached out to
doctor Shiva to set up another interview coming
up another couple weeks, both because of the
selection coming up and it's an interesting time
to reiterate some of the things he was
talking about, but also because of this overlapping
point. I mean, I told him that. I
said, specifically, the overlap of Zionism with the
election. I'm curious what his thoughts are. So
look forward to that.
Now, let's get into the 2 party illusion
part of this and censorship. The free speech
conversation. Because right now, you're getting this aggressive
call from the right saying, it's Kamala. We'll
destroy free speech. If we don't vote for
Trump, free speech is over.
As they're literally trying to call for censorship
around anti Semitism.
Like, it is truly insulting. And I think
anybody with a brain right now can recognize
that. They're right now, the right is screaming
about I mean, I just showed you Josh
Hawley screaming about why they're not censoring long
lived intifada, which just means resistance,
revolution.
You might as well say long live the
revolution, right, from the American Revolution. The point
is the same. You could argue that means
bloody terrorism, or you could argue it means
pushing back against an oppressive force.
Well, I the the bottom line is, what
is he doing right there? He's demanding that
this speech
be censored
or not allowed, which would lead to censorship.
So if we're pretending if anybody out there
for one second is acting like only one
side is threatening that right, then you are
lying to yourself or you're a dishonest person.
I wanna include this show from the 31st
August. Bipartisan digital ID and partisan managers circle
wagons as the 2 party illusion begins to
break down. Because the the digital ID is
obviously bipartisan.
Now,
we've seen this circulating.
All ever All the people that you'd expect.
He's saying, believe them when they tell you
who they are are tyrants. Exactly. Believe all
of them when they tell you who they
are.
All of them.
But this person saying, Hillary Clinton appeared on
CNN, which I'll play the clip for you.
Staying the control is slipping and calling for
social media can which here's what's funny about
this. Who knows what my point I look.
Hillary Clinton's a monster. She should be in
prison. This is the one of the worst
people I could possibly talk about.
But the point is always told to be
objective and what are they actually trying to
say. Now, obviously, I think Hillary Clinton has
designs like a lot of these oligarchs to
control what you think and say and do.
No question. But the way that this is
being framed is funny to me because it's
it's kind of like when Putin says,
oh, I guess I gotta support him all
then. And they all laugh after he says
Biden calls on his allies to support him.
It was a joke. Now maybe he still
does support her. But that the point was
he was joking. And it was such a
childishly obvious thing. And was he was making
a joke, like, because they my point is
he was trolling like he usually does
our 2 party illusion.
But what happened is all the right, not
jokingly, not kind of half heartedly, they straight
up said Putin endorses Kamala because it was
a politically advantageous point.
That's what they do. They lie. They all
of them. Left, right, they lie to you
because it's easy. Politics is that that's what
politics is. It's lying.
My point is when this this statement, she
says,
we are where was it?
That the
oh, hold on. It's not stated right there.
It says, quote, we lose total control, is
what she says in this clip.
So, obviously, she could mean that she's implying
right now they have total control and that
they might lose that, which is how they
all want you to read it. But then,
well, how do you explain Twitter? If they
have total control, well, then that doesn't make
any sense. But you see, it's not about
making sense. So what if you listen to
what she's saying, and I'm not even defending
her, she's saying that we'll lose total control.
Like, she's she's just speaking improperly. And I
my opinion is that they'll lose. She's trying
to say that this will get out of
control.
That is not to say that she doesn't
have the science to control everything you do.
Let but see, well, you don't need to
use a misrepresented
point to make something clear that we all
effing know that she's a monster that wants
to control your life. I'm just trying to
be objective as we always should. That's why
irritatingly objective is what we need to be
today because there's so much misinformation going around.
But the point is, yes, that she wants
to censor you. She wants to control your
speech. My point is so does the other
side or just your government.
The point is that as,
Klee points out, my tweet down here I'll
play for you in a second, they go,
l o l, this is Trump calling for
the exact same thing. Now, yes, it is
an older clip from a few years ago
or a couple years ago,
but the point is the same. And it
also is around anti semitism
right now as he keeps promising to handle.
First thing I'll do is shut down antisem
how do you think that happens?
Censorship.
But just because you're okay with that version
of censorship doesn't pretend don't pretend you are
anti censorship or pro free speech. You're not.
You're pro limited speech based on whatever you
dislike.
The clip here is about him saying we
need to control the Internet with Bill Gates
because ISIS.
You you think he's changed his opinion?
He'll tell you whatever you wanna hear, like
any politician. And, yes, they're all politicians. Here's
the one talking about we'll take the guns
and do due process later. That should matter
to you too. As Kyle Kyle Rittenhouse points
out similar points and gets eaten alive by
the partisan MAGA conversation,
which is not about facts. It's about circling
the wagons.
But here's the clip of Hillary Clinton.
We should be, in my view, repealing something
called section 230, which gave,
you know, platforms on the Internet immunity because
they were thought to be just pass throughs
that they shouldn't be judged for the content
that is posted. But we now know that
that was an overly simple view that if
the platforms, whether it's Facebook or
Twitter x Unfortunately, she says that my point
about that we already talked about is that
if they were to do that, all that
would do would is give them more room
to censor. They would say, well, now we're
liable, so now we're gonna censor even more.
And I'll and realize these platforms are not
independent entities. Elon Musk or whatever else, that's
an easy way to pretend. He's a military
contractor, guys. These things, look, that alone does
not prove that. But let's realize that it's
obvious. These platforms are just like everything else
under the auspices of the US government control
are influencing for its agenda.
All of them. YouTube,
overseas,
Using them to influence opinions and manipulate people's
thoughts. It's what they're doing.
Now, look, that's I mean, in regard to,
let's just say, Twitter, that's my opinion. But
I think it's clear that let's just even
say before that, that it was clearly admitted
that that was the case. Right? Supposedly, Twitter
files prove that to us even though we
already knew it. My point is it never
actually changed. Whether you wanna look at the
partnership with Garm that never stopped even though
the live bill's built, the point is it's
the same thing.
So with a government entity that is actively
doing so, her the point here is that
do section 2 30 being repealed would simply
allow them to pretend that now they're bound
because we're responsible, but it's the same dynamic.
It just gives them more leeway to censor
bluntly. When she goes on to make the
statement that everybody's talking. Overly simple view that
if the platforms, whether it's Facebook or
Twitter x or,
Instagram
or TikTok, whatever they are, if they don't
moderate,
and monitor the content,
we lose total control. And it's not just
the social and psychological effects. It's real harm.
So,
obviously,
moderation.
Right? That's the what she's suggesting. We have
to moderate
in order to otherwise, we lose total control.
Or and, of course, you can certainly read
that as shush that she has total control,
and they might lose that, which I don't
even is that what the republicans are claiming?
Does does she currently have total control? Well,
no. So that doesn't make any sense. But
see my point, that's what's being kind of
projected from this. Her point, I think, is
that they will lose
will get will be out of control.
More so than it is now is what
she's trying to say.
Right? But okay. So what what moderation
let me grab this real quick. Just trying
to do it secretly in the background, but
I lost my third thought.
Moderation is exactly what Yackerino
per pushed forward and he and,
Elon Musk happily agreed with.
So let's play that really quickly.
The idea being that if she's saying we
need moderation,
otherwise, this. And all their publicas are going,
see, she wants to destroy free speech, which
she does, by you. My point is, so
does everybody else in this illusion. Here's Yaccarino
proposing the exact same thing and works with
the ADL. That's a public conversation. They have
partnered with Garm, which they pretended they were
fighting. I mean, guys, this is the machine.
I was shocked by the evidence uncovered by
the house judiciary committee that a group of
companies organized a systematic illegal boycott against x.
Remember,
this is Jacarino versus Jacarino. So one thing
was recent, then other ones are from when
this first started.
Been feedback loop for the advertising experts in
this room
to help
develop Twitter into a place where they will
be excited
about investing more money. Product development,
ad safety,
content moderation.
Content
moderation.
That's what Okay. So now wouldn't you go,
okay, then there's the same thing. No. Because,
well, one's on the good guy censorship side,
the other one's on the bad guy censorship
side. Right? We want the good guy AI
and the good guy digital ID and the
good guy Technocratic Panopticon, not the bad guy
version. Understand? What the influence
is. That puts your global town square, the
one place that you can express yourself freely
and openly. We have built
content moderation tools that have never existed before
at this company. If you are gonna post
something
that is lawful,
but it's awful,
you get labeled.
So suppressed, shadow banned, censored.
As as San Hussein
clearly pointed out in our interview of the
past,
that is free speech. There's actually legal precedent
that says both of those things are free
speech. You can't have one without the other.
They knew that. They just don't care. They're
they're already censoring. So all they did was
give themselves some kind of open gap where
they can just act like, well, you know,
and on top of that, there are also
so bluntly censoring. Not because it's illegal, but
because they don't agree with it because the
ADL tells them to. That's not up for
debate. At long term risk,
people are hurt when the marketplace of ideas
is constricted.
And we've introduced a new policy called
freedom of speech,
not reach.
No small group of people should be able
to monopolize
or gets monetized.
But more importantly,
if you are gonna post something
that is lawful,
but it's awful.
You get labeled,
you get de amplified, which means it cannot
be shared.
And it is certainly demonetized.
Right. So the special group deciding who gets
money, well that's them right there. So everything
about what she's doing here is just gross
rank hypocrisy.
They don't care.
You know, and and by the way, who
gets to decide what's awful? Well, a very
select group of people that is working with
the ADL.
As meh as well as other groups. But
let's not forget, in their own lawsuit, which
I think was a complete facade around the
GARM,
they admitted that they had met or exceeded
every requirement of GARM. And upwards of 87
to 90%, I think is what the number
was, have complied with government censorship mandates.
That's all on the record, but, of course,
the Republicans never talked about it. I wonder
why.
So back to the point.
She's calling for moderation because bad speech. Well,
guess what? Twitter is openly doing. It's amazing
the lack of the the blind spots of
the partisanship.
Now
here is Trump back from 2,000 what was
it? I forget the exact year, but it's
not new. Just so it's clear. But this
is what he said. Because we're losing a
lot of people because of the internet and
we have to do something. We have to
go see Bill Gates and a lot of
different people
that really understand what's happening. We have to
talk to them maybe in certain areas closing
that Internet up in some way. Somebody will
say, oh, freedom of speech. Freedom of speech.
Yeah. Don't let that get brushed off. Oh,
freedom of speech.
There's guys, there is just right now, we're
gonna go over something when it comes to
Ron in a minute.
There is no taking out of context here.
Okay?
He says exactly what he means. Now you
could clearly, I'd be the first to point
out that he is a blustering fool some
often. And he'll say whatever jumps into his
head because he thinks it's gonna get a
clap because he's full of hubris.
And just to be clear, I dislike him
and think little of him just as much
as everybody else in politics.
But the point is that he says these
things. He means these things. Now he may
be saying it to get a clap and
maybe doesn't do it, but doesn't change the
fact that this is what he is pushing
forward. And, yes, has been clearly showing up
to this very point that he's willing to
do so if for no other reason than
Israel asked him to. Break the law, censor
you, take your guns away. But the bottom
line is he's telling you right there that,
woah, someone's gonna complain about free speech. Oh,
I you know, I should've let it finish.
Go go like this. Say, oh, freedom of
speech freedom of speech.
These are foolish people.
Oh, so people that object
about how that might be,
violating freedom of speech are foolish people. Now
even if you wanna pretend that he means,
well, ISIS is such a real threat because
they're they're in because that's what it was
about, or or radicalizing people online that you
think that's okay. So all you're admitting there
is that you do have a line. You
don't believe in free speech. You believe in
limited speech, which by the way is pretty
much everybody in the paradigm, left and right.
They just don't like to admit that.
Here it is. We have a lot of
somebody will say, oh, freedom of speech. Freedom
of speech.
These are foolish people. We have a lot
of foolish people. We have a lot of
foolish people. We've gotta maybe do something with
the Internet because they are recruiting by the
1,000.
That's not true.
It's such a ridiculous lie. But on top
of that, the point is that everyone he's
calling foolish, predominantly Republicans. They just don't see
it that way. The most of the left
at this point when he's saying this, are
all about that. Are saying, yeah. We need
to restrict this and restrict that.
Here we are.
He called you foolish and you don't care.
Here's Tulsi Gabbard doing the same thing. He
always said, when you allow free speech, we
lose total control. Well, that's not actually you
see, these these are people who are trying
like, again,
they both want that.
But the way that they're trying to take
this statement, which amounts to exactly what Iaccarino
said, and turn it into some admission of
how we lose our control over everything is
ridiculous.
Okay, Gabbard. Are you suggesting she currently controls
everything?
I mean, I would agree with a large
part of it when it comes to power
of government to people, these oligarchs. But what
about tech? What about Twitter?
How's that work?
People like Hillary Clinton, she says, and Kamala
Harris do not believe in first amendment because
they see it as an obstacle to achieving
their goal. Total control. You see, she's in
deliberately misrepresenting the statement. The point is that
it's exactly the same that's happening right now
with the person you're literally standing next to,
Tulsi. That's Elon Musk.
They are doing it right now. But it's
weird how you guys don't ever wanna point
that out. Doesn't that does that mean, guys,
anybody objective and honest, that should bother you,
that you're being lied directly to by people
acting like they're virtuous.
That's frustrating.
And again, she posts the same thing. How
weird. Here's Donald Trump. Oh, weird. Nobody cares
about that.
Ian Miller or somebody else saying the same
thing. Well, at least the anti free speech
extremists who run the Democratic party are now
openly admitting they want total control. You see
my point? That's the whole conversation about this.
Now, again, what's funny is, what do you
mean they want total control? Her statement is
we'd lose total control if we don't censor.
So they don't want it. They would have
it based on the the logic or lack
thereof that you're putting forward.
You get the point. It's the same thing.
This is partisanship. It's lazy. It is illogical.
It is lacking base, evidence, and it's both
sides of it.
And he she points the same thing.
So here, this is just a funny point
as well. This I I hate this platform.
I think it's ridiculous and terrible. But they
say, Hillary Clinton calls for social platforms like
X to censor monitor content. Warning, if they
don't. Well, guess what? That's exactly what's happening
on Twitter right now. You guys just are
too
childish to acknowledge it, I guess. But Tom
Elliott points out breaking.
Now, for forgive my
sort of curse word for children listening, so
earmuffs for half a second. He says broke
dick Twitter account takes interesting work from smaller
accounts and pretends they're adding value. His point
is he's the one that pointed this out
exactly the way that in fact, framed it
correctly.
Like, actually framed it in a way that
does give you the full context. So good
on Tom Elliott for doing that. And they
lie, they misrepresent it. So good on him
for calling that out. But that's what that's
what this platform does, guys. It's like these
the people's voice and all these it's just
they are cartoons
at the end of the day.
But so here
is the point we were getting at before.
So are we really gonna stand here and
try to pretend
that they're not actively calling for censorship for
Israel?
Or excuse me.
About anti semitism?
I mean, look. Even if you think there's
just this rampant anti semitic thing going on,
that's still free speech.
You're allowed
to say hate speech
in any context. Hate speech is not a
crime. Now I'm the I'm right there with
you to say the things that I might
deem in that category. I would say, well,
I think you're a disgusting person. That's my
right to say. But I would defend your
right to say those things because that's what
free speech actually means.
So the interesting part is right now, we
can obviously see. Now Twitter is one part
of it.
But it's important with how the social engineering
is going. But that's that's Elon. That's Yackarino.
They're obviously
flam I mean, what's it like? I was
I was gonna say flamboyantly. It works, but,
you know, just very obvious, conspicuously
doing that. And they're just like, that's okay.
But this hypothetical potential thing she said is
bad. Everybody be scared. We should be worried
about both. Obviously, the one doing it. But
then bringing it to the government side of
this.
Both the democrat party and the so your
government, both sides of your government or just
your government,
want to censor you if you are saying
things bad about what they would frame as
Jewish people, but really just any criticism of
Israel and their government.
Is anybody pretending that's not the case? Is
anybody actually trying to say that's not real?
Trump and the rest of them have been
screaming about how they will handle this when
he's in power.
Okay. So as long as we all could
acknowledge that, then let's go back to this
and make sure we aren't lying to ourselves.
Or that if you see Republicans out there
trying to stress, as we just saw them,
going, the Democrats win will be the end
of free speech. And I'll show you Elon
doing that right now.
They're either too dumb to see that this
is happening right now. More logically,
they're a part of it. And all they
want you to think is democrat bad guy
while we're doing the same thing. So you
just want the
republican flavor of censorship.
At least be self aware enough to admit
that.
And here's the thing that he said, oh,
you know what? I've I've had this lined
up. I might as well play it. It
it just it matters. Here he is saying,
take the guns.
The firearms first and then go to court
because that's another system. Because a lot of
times, by the time you go to court,
it takes so long to go to court
to get the due process
procedures.
To go to court, it would have taken
a long time. So you could do exactly
what you're saying, but take the guns first,
go through due process, sir.
Yeah. It doesn't matter what you think or
how you out of contact. The point is
anything that's due process second, doesn't matter what
you put in front of it, guys. That's
ridiculous.
You could argue he didn't understand, but I
think you know that he does. He just
is more about getting done what he wants
to get done because I'm a fast moving
businessman and I wanna get I want results.
I don't care about your pesky little rights.
Oh, free speech. We have a lot of
dumb people. Listen to him when he's telling
you who he is, exactly what they would
like to say about any democrat who they
put words in their mouth even though I
would argue they are actively doing the same
things. But you get that a lot. Right?
Where Trump will basically say the thing and
they go, well, no. You're misunderstanding or he
meant this or you don't understand what he
means. But then you have a Democrat who
will say something not even remotely that, but
they're like, here's what they wink wink mean.
It's just end the same thing in reverse.
It's frustrating, guys, and I'm hoping more and
more people are starting to really acknowledge this.
Even if you're a conservative or liberal, call
them out. Let's change this thing.
So here
is the clip.
Let me see here. Make sure I didn't
mix these up. Okay. Yeah. So that's next.
So let me play this is a clip
of him, as you guys have already seen
many times, saying
that congress should be controlled by Israel. Now
just to be clear, I'm not gonna play
them all, there are 6 clips here.
6.
All of them as clear as the one
I'm about to play. Every one of them
and and over the last this one's the
oldest one I'm gonna play next. Every other
one of them have been after that up
until right now. Every single one of them
make the same point in different way. That
when they were con when con when Israel
is controlled by congress, if you were like
the Tlaibs or AOCs, you wouldn't even be
in politics. Exactly.
Rightfully so. They used to control congress.
Exactly.
So you think that they're and right now,
he's telling you, I'm gonna handle antisemitism. That's
one of these down here I believe too.
First thing I'm gonna do, take her he's
telling you. I mean, on the surface.
And they just don't wanna hear it.
You know, the biggest, change I've seen in
Congress is Israel
literally owned the congress. You understand that 10
years ago, 15 years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And I think you know exactly what
I what I'm saying.
They had such power. Israel had such power
and rightfully
overcome
And rightfully overcome it. There is no misunderstanding
that. Now let's just say you think maybe
he misunderstood, misquoted him, or it's a lie.
Well, here is 6 here are 5 other
videos
saying the same thing.
Please make sure you share this, talk about
it. And by the way, don't think it's
only about Trump. Kamala is overtly supporting. They're
all doing the same thing. I'm more worried
about people who I think are being tricked
into thinking he represents something different. Because I
I also think he is the selection of
the illusion coming up next. My personal opinion.
Either way, regardless of your position,
these are facts, so that should matter.
End of story.
Now here is where we get into this
overlap, which, again, I actually I 100% agree
with Vanessa.
This is almost becoming
now it could just be you know, it's
like we walked to the corporate media, and
you we talk about this we've talked about
it a lot in the past where once
you see through it,
you just you can't it's it's almost it's
like watching a cartoon.
And I think more and more people are
getting there. And it's also, honestly, the corporate
media in itself in and of itself is
I mean, it's if you go they're they
are become what we used to make fun
of them as before. It's bad. But either
way, my point is
that this to me is embarrassing.
I I just I don't wanna believe that
everyone in this crowd is all just like
you can't this it's it's they're aiming at
the lowest common denominator.
It's childish the way they're speaking to you.
It's like it's the same way Kamala would
speak to people. They're act you they're it's
dumbed down. It's lacking substance. It's like, rah
rah. We're gonna America jingoism all day long.
That's what it is. Now I'm not saying
you
shouldn't believe in America or believe in the
constitution or represent the flag. I'm saying what
they're doing is a cartoonish version of it.
And they're pushing forward these games. In my
opinion, I don't think either of them care
at all about this.
But what makes the points after well, let's
let's well, I'll watch the clip first. And
she says, I watch this, s h I
t, and realize the disconnect from reality for
huge numbers of Americans is almost insurmountable.
Sadly, I agree. I don't wanna believe that
it's the majority though. I don't think that.
But I do agree it's a lot.
She says Trump and Musk are de facto
supporting carpet bombing of civilians across Middle East,
but Elon puts a cap on and cheer
cheer leads American in a dystopia like lemmings.
And she goes, yeah. Democrats, same s h
I t before I get the usual idiots
replying. So she sees it. It's not left
or right. It's the fame. It's all of
it. But my point
to what other people would point out is
it's not just about the Middle East though,
to make this about what people might argue
in this, who might believe in what they're
putting forward. But I agree with her. This
is the most important thing happening in the
world right now. But it's also about other
things going on domestically. It's about the idea
of your free speech. It's about the idea
of the digital ID. They're all pushing the
same stuff. To To which I'm sure Vanessa
would say as well if she had, you
know, more characters on Twitter. Either way, it's
important to recognize
that this,
I think, is about trying to bring you
down to a very the level of just,
like,
yeah. I I believe in America, and I
believe in rights, and I believe in you
know, like, instead of giving you substance, they're
just going,
good things, and you go, yay.
And it's it's simple. And it's, like, the
only reason we don't see it is because
the worst we're pretending that these are outsiders,
these billionaire oligarchs.
I mean, come on, guys.
And says
That's not it. Where was it? Right here.
In America, astronauts in respect.
Come here.
Take over, Elias. Take over. You just I
don't know. I mean, like, I'm sure I'm
overcritical,
but just it feels childish to me.
Jumping up and down. You're you hey. I
mean, it's it seems silly. Now what makes
it the worst to me is one thing
he says in here, which I know you'll
pick up on.
Hi, everyone.
As you can see, I'm I'm I'm not
just Maga. I'm dark Maga.
Which by the way, I'm seeing all these
people make a whole big deal about, which
just seems stupid to me. Like, people on
the left are going like dark Maga. What
does he mean? It's like, it's just so
stupid. And there's the paradigm for you. All
of it.
Well, first of all, I wanna say what
an honor it is to to be here.
And,
you know, the the the true test of
someone's character
is how they behave under fire. I would
agree with that. Now he's obviously making a
a clumsy overlap to get into the shooting
discussion because that's where they are right now.
But if we actually take the analogy and
recognize what it means
okay. When Elon was under fire or the
analogy being, like, in a tough spot around
Twitter, well, they bowed and they censored and
they suppressed. Okay. Trump in a 1,000 different
ways has fallen to the very deep state
that you pretend he's fighting. Whether it's assassinations
in regarding Iran or continuing all of the
wars they claimed they were gonna stop or
not locking her up or talking about JFK
or 911 or all the rest of it.
The point is, in a tough spot, they
caved.
I'm sure people that wanna believe in him
would say something different.
And we we we had one president who
couldn't climb a flight of stairs.
What's funny about that is there's just as
many videos of Trump stumbling on stairs, by
the way. But it's a dumb point to
make in either case because what does it
have to do with anything?
Right? I mean, realistically, it matter Biden's a
senile ridiculous person. He's probably not even fully
there, which I think is obvious. But the
point is about belittling this and trying to
rise up that all based on superficial
nonsense.
Don't let them turn you into children, which
is what they're doing.
And Angola who
and we we we had one president who
couldn't climb a flight of stairs,
and Angola who was fist pumping after getting
shot.
So we're told. Right? Or it nicked his
ear at best. Either way, it's pretty ridiculous.
And guys, this is not some big contentious
statement.
It doesn't make sense for someone to get
nicked in the ear with a bullet like
that and have nothing on his ear. What
was it? 5 days later? 4 day? I
forget the time frame. Or is it 12
I forget the it was not enough time
for there not to be some kind of
a mark, which anybody who had any anyway,
the bottom line is what's the overlap there?
So he gets nicked in the ear and
pumps his fist, which
and and Biden can't walk upstairs?
I mean, it just seems it's just it
they're just dumping these narratives in your mind.
It's all about buzzwords and talking points. It
doesn't have anything to do with anything that
matters to anybody.
Yay. Trump pumped his fist, and he's a
clumsy guy. America.
Fight. Fight. Fight.
God. Coming down the face.
I mean, isn't am I am I crazy
or is he the way he acts just
seems like he's just juvenile. Like, he's he's
excited. Like, I know he I don't know.
I'm overthinking it. But either way, just you
meowing blood and face and pumping, it just
seems dumb to me. You tell me if
I'm overthinking it, but to me, the this
stands out as worse than usual.
Just it feels overproduced. It feels dumb. It
feels like they're I feels like they don't
believe what they're saying.
America
is the home of the brave.
Yeah. Right, guys? Brave.
You see what I'm saying?
What is that okay. So is that is
that a cheer moment? Home of I mean,
this is about tapping into something
meaningless that's I mean, it's it's not about
whether you think that America's home with the
brave, or you believe in America, or believe
in that we have brave fighting people. It's
not what the point is. It doesn't mean
anything to say that.
If there was a point coming, then you
may but this is just about
talking points and empty jingoism.
And there's no true there's no true attest
then, Car Agenda Fire.
And he went right back to the beginning
point.
So that who do you want representing America?
Based on what you just said, well, I
I mean, did that change anybody's minds? You
guys were already be I honestly recognize as
well that Elon is a terrible public speaker.
Yeah.
Absolutely.
And, I think I think this this this
election
Here it comes. I should've done. Election of
our lifetime.
I I shouldn't have said anything. I want
you guys to be come on. That
ends the great the most important looks of
our lifetime. Oh, really? You mean like you've
said
every single 2 years as long as I've
ever been doing this? But this one, I
know we say it every year is different.
I it's apparently worked. Most of them are
going, but this time it really is.
This is this is no ordinary election.
The other side wants to take away your
freedom of speech. Oh, there it is.
Well, no, they wanna do what you're doing
right now. In fact, they just wanna continue
it.
But I I'm not I'm gonna fall on
deaf ears, I imagine, to people that just
don't wanna hear that. They're gonna take away
your rights and our arms. Well, I just
showed you Trump's clip on that. The reality
is it's your government. All these narratives are
about trying to pit you against your neighbor.
It's about your government, and they've only ever
been escalated in this. Don't forget as Whitney's
pointed out with Bill Barr and precrime and
medical precrime, Trump is the one that made
bump stocks illegal. Bill Barr was the one
that was trying to go after you using
these concepts, but let's all ignore the facts
because Elon has a hat on.
That they wanna
it's we're we're they wanna take away the
right to vote effectively.
Oh, okay. So the right to vote. You
mean, like, they already have? Like, they've stolen
it from you entirely? Or the voting machine
conversation or the Save Act, which is gonna
absolutely drive us into a digital ID panopticon,
all based on the illusion of
vote. Unreal.
We have 14 states now that that don't
require voter ID. California
or Eastland,
it is just just passed a law
banning voter ID
for voting.
Now my opinion
is that this is deliberately meant to drive
you into the Save Act
because that's what that's about. That's the counterbalance.
And all that is is the driving you
into digital ID using both sides of the
counterbalance. That's how this works.
Realistically,
the voter ID conversation is I mean, the
obviously, we should care whether there is somebody
who is not a citizen voting, period, before
that gets the assumption out there. But my
point is that they're using these false dichotomies
to drive you into one very clear position,
and it's working.
I I I still can't believe that's real.
So how are you supposed to have a
good a proper election if there's no ID?
It's me. God. He's such a bad speaker.
And and and and free speech free speech
is the bedrock
of democracy. You're censoring people right now.
And if if people don't know what's what's
going on, if they don't know the truth
Right. How can you how can you make
an informed vote? Good point, Elon. But you're
censoring people right now. You're hiding information that
covers up Israel's genocide. You're actively involved with
manipulations going on in Honduras, going on in
Venezuela, going on with Iran. All of you
are doing that.
But we're not supposed to know that because
you're censoring information. But let's keep aiming at
the other side. Have free speech in order
to have democracy.
That's why it's the first amendment. In order
to have democracy
I mean, god, look. To be real realistically,
this person is clumsily speaking through talking points
he was handed. That's what I think.
The idea is that free speech is not
something you're given, which is what he's highlighting.
It is something that's inherent. It is god
given. And the reality of what that leads
to is what we want, not your clumsy
mob rule democracy narrative. How about we talk
about a republic if we're even gonna pretend
we still have what we started with, but
they don't wanna get into that. Even though
they frame this whole thing about defend the
republic, but then scream about democracy.
We have to be smarter than this.
And the and the and the second amendment
is there to ensure that we have the
first amendment.
He's just tapping into these statements that everybody
knows that we all should agree with quite
frankly, but he knows it's a partisan point
that left doesn't agree with. Because it but
that's the truth. It is. It's the reality
of the second amendment. We all know that
if we're not brain dead. But the point
here is that all he's trying to do
is he's
earning his place.
Now look, when he or even right now,
by the way, it should change the way
he is work his dynamic on in regard
to Twitter.
When he is or if he if not
right now is a government entity, whether an
adviser or not, that changes a lot legally
speaking. But I doubt it's gonna happen. I
bet you'll see him do the same things,
and it'll just because none of them care
whether they have the legal right or not.
I mean, it's that's quite obvious. But so
here is
that here they are trying to
rally up the crowd using very lazy words
and and no bay no substanceless comments.
But what's interesting,
as the savior points out, what happened to
the old Elon Musk? Right? The Elon Musk
that back in the day
was highlighting that Iran was being encircled by
US bases.
Trying to make a joke saying, oh, the
irony.
But the point is, he's play he's posting
a meme that says, Iran wants war. Look
how close they put their country to our
military bases.
The point he's obviously making is he's a
different person today. Now, of course, you can
change your opinions. But it's weird how over
the process of a couple of years, you're
suddenly a pro war by pretending to be
anti war, pro
censorship while pretending to be free speech,
manipulator of the government. And here you are
pointing out the government making the the point
is right now, they're all in line with
going after Iran. So something clearly shifted. I
think you can know where my mind is
going with that. Why they were talking about
the personal limitation from bbnetyahoo
to come to, you know, the overlap of
going to Israel to see the atrocity propaganda.
Whatever role he's playing,
he's a part of the machine.
Obviously, my opinion. But the point is that
that seems to be clearly connected, and things
have shifted. Now here is Pompeo saying it's
been months since it became publicly known that
Iran is interfering in our election. Oh, what
he means is it's been months since the
US government
claimed that with no evidence, but that's what
Mike Pompeo loves, just narratives with nothing to
back it up. But he goes, so where
are the consequences? Because, of course, we should
be attacking them based on lies from our
government. Right? Well, that's what they're used to.
If Biden Harris gave Iran a pass.
They're all hawkishly against Iran. So it's so
funny how they love to play that game.
But here's what Daniel McAdams says, $20 this
neocon freak gets a top post in Trump
2 point o.
I see it coming too. He's clearly been
building his image and talking out. I bet
you he's in that too.
And there'd be it's the same thing. We
all anybody with a brain can see where
this is going.
But this
guy's again, same way before.
So he changed his image, Elon Musk, to
this hat him with the hat with the
map American flag. I mean, again, tell me
if I'm wrong.
To me, this is
like a parody.
I feel like he's making fun of you.
Like, quite frankly, I've just stated exactly, guys.
He's making fun of you.
He is making fun of you. And you're
out there cheering these people on like they're
sent by God. They're gonna say, he's making
fun of you.
I honestly believe that.
This is stupid.
And it's not because, oh, bad America or
that. I hate Trump. I just not nothing
to do with those things. And if quite
frankly, I love this country, and I believe
deeply in the constitution,
outside of the as always. My point is
that you know my opinions of the reality
of government. But within this construct, if we're
forced to live within it, I believe in
the constitution and what this has been set
up. But my point is,
it's not about those things or the equal
hate I have for all politicians.
It's about the fact that this is childish.
The flag in the background, the the hat,
it just it's I genuinely think he's making
fun of you all.
Because I don't think any of them believe
half of the things they put out there.
Or this.
Make America based again.
Guys, he's making fun of you. I hope
you can see that. We're all, yeah, rah
rah, Trump and Elon America. And he's it's
he's making fun of you. Now here, vigilant
Fox points out what he was just saying.
Elon Musk, you know, the point that starts
as you gotta see this grave warning. It's
the same old dumb things you've been hearing
for everybody. It's the same substanceless claims. Oh,
man.
Tell me that comes back.
There it
is. Quite frankly, it's nothing it's not a
grave warning, and he's saying the same things.
They're gonna take your free speech as I'm
currently doing it. That's what's stupid. But this
says the mood shifted. Is it the other
side most to take away your free speech?
They will take away your right to bear
arms.
Well, that's your government. It's been happening left
and right, far back as you wanna look.
But he goes again, those against freedom of
speech are the bad guys.
Now check this out. This isn't a
though they even gave it their own little
check mark saying it's an official group. It's
called America PAC.
It's the America PAC.
Which is just a special interest group influencing
politics. It has nothing to do with America.
It has to do with politics, which is
probably probably no run by Israel.
I have no nothing to back that up.
I'm just simply pointing out that I think
it's funny that freedom of speech is the
bedrock of democracy, which it's not, guys. Democracy
is mob rule. Freedom of speech is the
bedrock of a representative government, which I don't
believe democracy is. In any case, support candidates
who champion freedom, not censorship. Well, Elon Musk
is literally censoring. Trump is calling for censorship
around anti semitism.
So are we this stupid, or are we
just lying to everybody? Those against freedom of
speech are the bad guys. 100% agree, Elon.
But I don't think you meant it the
way that it should be taken.
Now here is what he posted.
This was today.
I just
I think my honest opinion is that he's
well aware of what he's doing. He knows
that they're doing these things. He knows that
he's bluntly lying about censoring and pretending they're
fighting for free speech. And they also know
that they're in an ideological echo chamber by
design. So this is meant to go, look.
We know that we're the ones and the
other sides doing the things that they're all
actually doing. By posting this video with no
comment, it's meant to say, this is what
the other side is doing. Even though what
he out what she outlines,
guys, is the Republican party to a tee
also the Democrat party?
Is it so hard to change someone's mind?
Let's talk about it. If you're new to
my channel, I'm, of course, Rachel, the neuroscientist.
The brain really doesn't like changing its mind
and that gives rise to things like the
confirmation bias, anchoring bias.
Confirmation bias means that we'll actually selectively filter
out information
that is incongruent with our existing beliefs. Even
if we do process that information, we'll give
it a lot less weight than we would
with something that actually aligns with our existing
ideas. Anchoring bias is where we hold on
to the very first thing that we learn
about something and it's hard for us to
let go of that, even when we're presented
with evidence that suggests that it's not accurate.
What a terrible design! Why are we like
this? Well, neuroscientifically
speaking, once you learn something, your brain has
to restructure and rewire itself.
We also instinctively perceive
change, uncertainty,
unpredictability
as inherently dangerous. Sticking to what's familiar can
obviously serve as an evolutionary advantage.
The last and perhaps more psychological
component
that is that our ideas tend to be
tethered to our identity
and the brain really doesn't like threats to
identity.
Your sense of self involves so many different
structures,
memories,
processes
in the brain. To
rewrite that would be very complicated. And in
the daily struggle for survival,
potentially fatal.
They know all this and they use these
things actively against you. What's hilarious to me
is that either he doesn't know that he's
putting out a video that basically describes what
he is and what he's doing or all
of them in this game, or he does,
and he's doing this to obviously play what
I ex do what I explained to begin
with.
But what's wild to me is confirmation bias.
Guys, that's exactly why we do what we
do. That's why we talk about question everything.
That's why we discuss the,
irritatingly objective conversation, nonpartisan,
actively questioning and challenging ideas. They don't do
that.
Either side of the paradigm. And it's obvious,
of course, to the other side, but they
never wanna self reflect. Or, you know, you
could talk about things in Haiti we just
discussed, the lies about Venezuela.
They're all still holding those same positions despite
the evidence that proved that even what they
posted was false.
Not mistaken, but false. Deliberately misrepresented.
But look at what they're saying right now.
They hold the same opinions. So it doesn't
it's an objective fact that they are exactly
what they just she just said.
And look, you could argue that maybe I
am and I don't recognize it. That would
make sense. We tend to not recognize that
in ourselves. But my point is the same
about what we're highlighting.
Not an individual on Twitter or on whatever
platform,
but a government entity
deliberately using these things to keep you in
place.
Like, you're stuck in the mud.
But but Elon shared it, so he must
be on the other side. Right? That's I
mean, guys, we've fallen we've fallen back into
this, like, if they disagree, then it must
be the opposite, like, binary way of thinking,
which is so lazy and easy to manipulate.
But Elon said it, so he must believe
it. Right? Here he is going, the Democrat
party is openly stating they wanna change the
constitution
to end free speech.
Again okay. So first of all, John Kerry
is saying if Democrats or he says if
Democrats win, we can change the first amendment
to fight disinformation.
Which is selectively quoted. It's not exactly what
he actually said.
But the point well, it says here our
first amendment stands as a major block. That
this you can watch the clip. It's in
there. The point though, again, to be clear,
as I pretty sure made whether it's anti
semitism or anything else, they are censoring you
right now, and they all plan to continue
to do that. There's no question.
So it's very dishonest for them to pretend
like it's going to happen while they're certainly
they're currently doing it. They don't need to
change the constitution to simply not respect your
freedom of speech. Secondarily,
changing the constitution
requires
some kind of legislation. Thirdly, you can't just
change the constitution if it's repugnant
to the to to to your basically, a
law. I I started off wrong. A law
is not valid if it's repugnant to the
constitution. And that means the original constitution and
the bill of rights, which are the first
10 amendments.
After that, which, by the way, if you
remember, I made this point thousands of times.
The first 10 amendments, if you make sure
you look, none of them are repugnant or
contradictory
to the constitution.
Right? There's a reason for that. That's why
they're valid. Mayberry versus Madison, I think it
was 18/98?
I could be wrong on the date. The
point is, they rule, the Supreme Court, that
if it's repugnant to the constitution, it is
null and void. That's Supreme Court precedent.
So today, for example, if they suddenly pass
a law that says you don't have freedom
of speech, it doesn't matter.
It's not it's repugnant to the constitution, therefore
it's null and void. That's not how the
constitution works. It is not a constantly evolving
thing like they it is in some cases.
But you can add on new amendments as
long as they're not repugnant to the original
this is the point. It's very simple.
Because the idea is it's god given. It's
inherent. They were there whether or not they
have eroded. So for him to say they're
gonna change the constitution either shows that he
has a fundamental misunderstanding
or ignorance around what the Constitution is, or
that it's
advantageous for the current political situation. They're gonna
take it away from you! Now, look, I'm
gonna be clear about this. Both sides are
already doing that. Both sides could make a
law that says you don't have it. It
doesn't change the fact that they can't do
that. And but to be clear, doesn't change
the fact that they might still not try
to use force to enforce it on you.
My point is they're all still doing that
to come back to the original concept. And
you know that's true.
This is just lazy. It's dangerous. Because what
they're doing is trying to trap you in
to thinking you picked this future when reality
is just your government playing the same old
false binary game to trick you into it.
Don't forget here, APAC tracker pointed out, back
on August 7th,
when Grok had a little mistake where they
were showing how many tags were censored on
people's platforms,
he pointed out that TLab, more than apparently
anybody that was even showing this, had 60
different tags by Twitter.
This is Yaccarino
and Elon Musk, their Twitter.
And it was 60 different tags that were
censoring and suppressing what we do. I mean,
some of these are arbitrary. I have nothing
to do with anything we're talking about. Doesn't
matter, though. 60, which are still there. Of
course, after they noticed people were seeing this,
the point was there was this loophole where
you could ask Grok specifically and it would
break down the code for you. Then weirdly,
everything went down for a second, came back
up and nudge. It wasn't working anymore. Weird.
Of course, the point was,
we all know what this is. They're censoring.
We know that. It's not even up for
debate.
Now here's some clear examples from right now.
Mark, Mark Sloboda.
Oh, hold on. I'm pretty sure I was
following him.
That's weird. He says the account of Russian
military analyst and think tank, Ribar, Ribar Forest,
has been censored and blocked on Twitter by
American oligarch, Elon Musk.
So here we have another account.
I think this one was
I thought I grabbed it. Excuse me. Oh,
I did. This is actually the tweet that
I grabbed from Mark Sloboda. The point is
we have
this account, which is censored.
Now the point again is whatever you think
about these these platforms,
it says your account is suspended.
After careful review, determine you broke the rules.
Here's what they wrote. Our account on x
has been blocked. Overall, we didn't really believe
that much would change under Musk. In In
the work of independent Russian resources and western
social media has always been subject to restrict
restrictions. However, it's interesting to observe
how the public image of the Twitter CEO
who speaks in support of free speech against
the American deep state and the democratic party
is at odds with reality.
That's the truth, guys.
They're censoring Israeli posts more than anything, but
they're also censoring stuff I've still seen things
being censored around vaccine injury. I've seen things
being censored like this, around simply, you know,
Russia's not allowed to say what they're rather
Russia commentary.
Like people about Russian discussions.
It not it should matter. If you're an
objective person, these things should matter. Or like
this.
Doctor Fidel Ram who Dan knows,
says Twitter removed this post. Now he posted
these images first, and they deleted them for
this is still up at as of as
of right now.
Refresh just to make sure.
So his Twitter removed this post, but we
will not be silenced. Enough with the killing.
This is in Gaza, an airstrike that hit
the Alamo Center For Orphans,
where thousands of displaced people in Gaza City
and Northern Gaza took shelter. Women, children, elderly.
These are children at an orphanage
in the dark while they're sleeping.
Just bombed while everyone's focusing on Lebanon.
As Dan wrote oops.
What?
There it is. He says, well, Elon Musk
and his legions of sycophants portray him as
the savior of free speech. He straight up
censors evidence of Israel's genocide in Gaza. And
realize, these images are not even as graphic
as half the stuff you're currently seeing on
Twitter. There's literally no and they didn't get
any justification. They just censored it.
I guarantee you know what that's about.
Now here is Doom.
Followed with this platform
to a mod on some of our channels.
So now to be clear before I show
you this, it's there's curse words.
It's explicit.
But to be clear,
obviously, this is protected under free speech. Cussing,
obviously. People cuss on Twitter constantly.
The I the reason I guarantee you they're
gonna claim this was censored is because the
one that says violent speech right there.
Is because they be directed at Jared Kushner
and deliberately misrepresenting what he's saying. But even
if you pretend he's saying something about Jared's
threatening their family, I'm gonna go on to
show you 7 other posts where they're literally
going kill their family, rape that person, that
are right now still on Twitter, that nobody
cares about. In fact, that we've had people
report.
And they're still there. We've shown you the
examples many, many, many, many times. Where you
have the contradiction where it'll say, you
know, Muslim, you know, Islam is the end
of our whatever and it it's completely fine.
You simply remove that word, put Judaism, and
it's censored immediately.
If you're objective, you already know that. So
here's what Doum said. Now again, earmuffs for
the children. I'm not gonna curse, but it's
written on the screen.
It's it's tags Jared Kushner because the point
was Jared Kushner was discussing this about,
us going and fighting for Israel. And he
says, f you,
pig, effer.
Use your family to go die for Israel.
Okay. So what they're trying to represent this
as is he's saying,
don't kill your family. It's not it's obviously
not what he's saying. He's saying, F you.
Use your family to go die for Israel.
We're not gonna do that. But even if
you wanna pretend what he's saying, recognize the
inconsistency
here.
K? Here, just simply go for the first
part, just this person saying, f Palestine.
Nobody cares about that. Right? 1,800,000
views, by the way.
You say f
Israel
is being censored on this platform.
Not and again, to be clear, it's not
ubiquitous. It's not an ever use. Some some
get removed. But the point is, it's obviously
slanted. Without question.
This one says, I hope you get raped
by a pack of black people. Well, that's
interesting. I wonder why that one's still up.
I mean, some of these accounts aren't small,
this one is, but some of them are
not tiny.
This person
says, I hope they kill them and all
those terrorist lovers.
Talking about Palestinians.
That's the conversation. How is that any different?
Still there. Nobody cares about that. Here, this
one, this is a per a saw some,
Solomon Ahmed pointing out how they're bombing Beirut.
And they're calling it a limited operation while
they destroy buildings and mosques and hospitals and
schools right now, Which again, is absolutely happening
right now. It's just Gaza 2 point o.
They're just switching right into the same thing.
This person says good. I hope they kill
them all.
Couple of Israeli flags.
You get the point?
Obvious inconsistency, the double standard of everything that
Twitter and Elon Musk represents?
Then to this point,
just to include this because I wanna make
sure you saw it, I did this just,
this was yesterday that I set up I
put this
up. Right now,
Elon Musk is still using Authentix, a a
Israeli intelligence platform,
to
verify who you are for Twitter.
And it says right here, not only, which
by the way comes up automatically checked by
the way if you don't look closely enough,
I consent to x and Authentix
using images of my ID and my selfie.
And it says including
extracted biometric data
to confirm my identity for Twitter. Even though
they don't need biometric data to confirm your
identity for Twitter. And even Twitter will say
clearly in their own information, they don't need
it. They don't use it right now, at
least.
Then why is Authentix taking it? And if
you read their information, what it says right
there, may store it for up to 30
days.
If you read deep into their it's my
opinion? And again, it's based on what their
actual information says, and I already went over
this, where Authentix is pro
screening about the digital ID, how this is
the next thing we need to do, that
they I guarantee they're not holding it for
30 days. It's forever.
Just like every other platform we've ever seen.
Bottom line, that's a lie. He told you
when he got called out by a censored
man and plenty of others that, okay. We
we acknowledge it. We're gonna switch to Stripe.
Which by the way, now that think about
it, I should've grabbed that tweet where he
says that. But we all saw the conversation.
They didn't. They're using Stripe as well. But
they did not stop using this. Here's a
censored man, and you should check this out,
saying before verifying ID with Authentics on Twitter,
read this thread. After reading it, you'll understand
why so many of us are opposing Elon's
decision to make us hand over our IDs
and biometric data to Israeli intelligence.
You know, the group committing genocide right now.
Not even to get into whether a Palestinian
might try to use Twitter, what they might
do there with location biometric data. Who knows?
It's simply about the idea that we're allowing
this genocidal maniac,
the Israeli government,
to scoop up your biometric data.
That should bother everybody.
So here we are.
Still doing it.
Where are all the republicans who care about
that? But digital ID, great reset.
I guess it only matters when it's happening
from a Democrat. Right?
So here
oh, I think we are this was oh,
this was just doing I think I I
just pulled out twice by accident. So same
point. Right? So here we are. We're talking
about the idea of the
republican side of this.
Right? So they're saying the left is gonna
censor. Clinton wants total control. They're gonna censor
us all day long. We need to fight
them all over. We're never gonna have an
election again.
Okay?
So are we gonna pretend, like I said
before, that the republicans are not actively calling
for censorship around antisemitism.
Six videos right here, where they're telling you
they're they're gonna fight antisemitism.
I don't what what do you think, they're
gonna fight it with with a gun?
They're gonna fight it with mean words? No.
They're gonna fight it with censorship because that's
what this means. And you damn well know
that.
So here again was Josh Hawley
literally screaming at this person about censoring long
live the intifada.
How dare you not condemn them? They want
this to be suppressed.
So even if you disagree even if you
agree with that. If you can't acknowledge that
that is the same thing
from the other side wanting a sense and
by the way, don't forget the left is
wanting a sense of the same thing.
That should bother a lot of people that
are paying attention. But these are both Republicans
sitting there screaming about censorship, and that's coming.
Here is an overlapping point from Canada. But
guess what? These are right now, the Republican
leadership
are actively using police to inter to threaten
Canadians
because they're talking about Israel. Social media posts
about Israel.
Who wants your lawyer about social media posts
in Israel? You've been putting some things on
your personal social media. Literally saying you're walking
a thin line. You're walking a line.
So now let's think about how clear this
is. This is what's going to happen here,
and that's a Republican in this conversation as
well. Or rather, excuse me, a, you know,
right wing. Whatever it's you know, I forget
the thing it's,
whatever it is in Canada. The point is,
specifically,
the obvious reality of what we're talking about.
Now here is Alex Jones
saying, breaking.
The democrats have launched a new attempt to
take me off the air and shut down
Infowars on October 18th. The deep state is
openly planning to trigger a civil war if
Trump is reelected and wants my show off
the air so I can't expose their plans.
Yeah. Who knows? Maybe.
I think it's really ridiculous.
You know, there's just this guy it's just
a cartoon in my opinion. I mean, at
the end of the day, as somebody rightfully
points out here, well, don't you have a
home office? Can't you still broadcast? Well, you
really can. Just like we're doing right here.
So it's not really about taking the I'll
be unable to show you what's going on
if they take this down. No. You absolutely
still can. You still and just like last
time, and again, just to be clear, I
would also, regardless of how much I can
completely see this person being a
manipulator,
that I would still defend his right to
say whatever and not be censored regardless.
Because that's the line you have to take.
Just like I said with Sandy Hook, what
they did to him was persecution politically whether
or not I agree or disagree about whatever
he's doing.
The point is that this seems like a
ridiculous thing to say right now. When you
when anybody who's paying attention could recognize that
they're all playing the same game, they're all
leaning in the same direction. Digital IDs, board
you know, the same. It's we've already gone
over all of it.
And what I think was,
I forget who said it, but the bottom
line is that they're screening about going after
Iran. Guys, that's a deep state agenda. If
we're gonna make a point about this, it's
ridiculous that we can't recognize that we're just
blindly going along with a deep state. They've
tried to assassinate Trump. Well, what do you
think Mike Pompeo is? Is he part of
the good guy team? I thought that already
got exposed during his last administration. Now Pompeo
is the one saying, go after Iran. And
they're like, yeah. Iran bad guy. Even though
Elon was 30 seconds ago saying, look at
them surrounding Iran. The point is
they are the deep state or simply your
government. They are what you pretend you're fighting.
And here he is saying, we have to
go with the get Trump elected or the
deep state's gonna create a civil war. Like,
each of me, it's just cartoonish because it
is the same thing.
That's the point is that it's not 2
entities fighting for power.
I'm sure you
question me.
I want you to. I want you to
look deeper into this because the reality becomes
so shockingly obvious.
And then the idea of just they were
shut it. They're gonna shut me down, so
I can't expose their plans. Well, isn't that
what you're doing right now? What what you
got some secret document that shows the plan?
Then why wouldn't you release it now?
Come on, guys. We know we're smarter than
this.
And couple of the points about censorship, which
again are is all completely around Israel, which
is what Alice Jones, the rest of them
will just completely avoid and talk about globalism
even though Israel represents the most obvious entity
within that right now, but won't talk about
it though because obvious reasons.
I just had shared this recently because I
wasn't sure if it was still happening. And
by the way, on that note, this was,
from August 3rd,
and people were showing me that I was
they weren't able to add me to communities.
And that time, I was also being boxed
out of, like, subscriptions
and whatever else. But I was just curious.
I was like, is this still happening regarding
communities? Let me know. But somebody commented, please
cover this. So thank you k god for
saying this. Rachel Blevins
was she got her entire I've actually been
seeing this a lot. But let's be clear.
First of all, Twitter or YouTube is ridiculous.
They censor constantly. So it's not unique or
new that YouTube is doing this, but it
does matter to me that it seems to
be surging
and it seems to be tailored or centered
around Israel. She says they just removed her
entire channel,
claiming that she violated hate speech policy, of
course, again, which is not a crime. 8
years of Talos work she put out.
63,000 subscribers. Man, again, I I was just
taken down with over a 100,000.
And she's, I know it doesn't come as
a surprise,
but she's devastated. And she and rightly so.
It's it's a hard thing to see that
happen even if you know it might be
coming.
And I love Rachel's work, by the way.
I've been on her show recently. But it
says my last video with the with, I
have a clip of him coming up in
a second with Saeed Mohammed Mirandi. That's what
it's about, guys. Hit a 100000 views in
12 hours.
A new record for her channel. See, that's
what they wanna stop, is that viral moment.
And she says joining the special club with
Mark Spermodo, we just talked about that, Glenn
Dason, d DDG Geopolitics, and Dave T. Love,
of course, who have challenged the US narrative
on Ukraine to have been deleted by YouTube.
Now what she's talking about, by the way,
is about
the overlap of Iran and Israel,
and that's my point.
Hate speech.
Here's another example.
Scott Ritter, which only a minute long, Casey
Wright shared this.
YouTube apparently has like this So Scott Ritter
is one of the most prolific voices in
this because he, you know, understands the the
weapon side of it as an affirm or
respecter. And he's he's very outspoken about what's
going on. And his his voice holds a
lot of weight in the conversation.
So,
George Galloway was gonna invite him on the
show.
And YouTube
stopped their ability to stream because he was
the stated guest.
We think about how crazy that is. And
if you listen to the clip, he says
it himself. He says YouTube just this is
what Casey writes. YouTube banned Scott Ritter's channel
after they they banned him for every channel.
They're enforcing a ban that prohibits anyone, at
least right now Galloway, from interviewing him. That
is wild because at the end of the
day, that's based on what? The state his
name and the title?
I mean, guys, it's crazy. They're they're in
desperate cover up mode.
Or just desperate deflection mode. There's no covering
this up. And I am convinced
this is about what's going on with Israel
and their genocide. And just and I mean,
literally, Israel pulling every possible string even as
it exposes itself to pull those strings.
It's it's a downward spiral. You know, I
know you see it. And just last point
on Twitter, or I mean, on on YouTube.
Just thought it was interesting. I I just
glanced at what was trending. I'm like, I
don't I care so little about YouTube today.
In my opinion, it is a dying platform
other than cat videos and nonsense. And I
think we all kinda sense that because they
started pushing out everybody that built what this
platform was.
But look at what the what's trending.
Exactly what I'm talking about. Stupid meaningless, which,
you know, you can have fun with it
if you wanna look at these videos. I'm
not complaining or or deny or belittling that
you might like these videos. What I'm saying
is, it's funny to me that this is
what it's become.
But
what I found interesting is right at the
top, standing out, which is rarely the thing
is all about North Carolina, North Carolina, North
Carolina. Just below all of the cake and
cat videos and whatever else. But to me,
it doesn't mean therefore it means that, but
it's it signals
that that's part of an agenda right now.
That's why they want that up trending. Just
my opinion. But we should never assume because
it's there, therefore the op, like I said
before. But I just found that fascinating.
Now, to overlap with that about the White
House or just politics in general in this
country and the world, Glenn Greenwald points this
out. And I want this to reflect on
the idea of Trump and Elon, their uncomfortably
over close overlap with Israel,
same with Kamala Harris. He says through though
through some remarkable coincidence,
the White House official
who is currently running US policy toward Israel
well, and he has while Biden sleeps and
drools and an Israel born
while he sleeps and drools, an Israeli born
former IDF soldier.
That is who's currently direct running US policy
regarding Israel. A US an Israeli born former
IDF soldier. How is that even possible?
Think about that for a second. Would you
I mean, what it was a Chinese born
American citizen? Would we allow them to be?
I mean, how does this make sense to
anybody?
Who says and the US I mean, think
about this actually. Well, I mean, I guess
it makes more sense if it was the
the republican party. Because the idea being that
they, you know, the point would be
if I were worried about outside foreign influence,
it's interesting that we never seem to care
about that overlap. It should matter whether that's
a UK or anybody else. Brian Mast wearing
an IDF uniform or a UK uniform. It
matters though, no matter what foreign entity it
is.
And he and he adds, and the US
face of reporting on Israel
is also an Israeli who was in the
IDF until last year. That's Barack or, was
it Riva? Barack Riva. Ravid.
I find that very obvious. I, you if
you you could've said this to me, I'd
be like, most likely the case because it's
obvious, but I would've double checked it. The
point is that this is not shocking. But
to some, it may not be something they
want to acknowledge.
Michael Tracy points this out. Same point from
before. It's not left or right. It's the
whole damn thing. He says it will shock
you to learn that both senator Bob Casey,
a Democrat, and GOP opponent, Dave McCormick,
declared at their debate
that there is no red line,
that they would not that they would not
cross in support of Israel.
It's a weird way to say that. The
point is there's no red line. There's nothing
that would stop them from supporting Israel. I
keep showing you this. This is not an
accident.
The same thing that clumsy John Federman would
say. They've all said it. No conditions. No
red line. They're saying,
we don't care about genocide. We're either compromised,
threatened, or Zionist. Or whatever you wanna call
it. The the point is how you can
get away with saying that. I don't mean
get away with, but like, these are people
running for office at a time when it's
obvious the vast majority of Americans of the
world see this. And their stance is no
red line.
Just an appoint guess guess what? There's no
other option. So guess what? Well, lesser of
eagles.
There you go again. How about we ask
for the non genocidal candidate? Where that where's
that person? Not on the stage.
Illusion of demagogue. Illusion of choice. Here's APAC
again proudly going 97%
of the ones we backed won.
Yeah. Saying the quiet part out loud.
And I'll include these shows we've done in
the past. It the Israeli election interference and
psychological operation industrial complex. And that's just simply
the reality of how this is an Israeli
asset was proven by even the Guardian who's
influencing elections around the world, and even he
says 26 presidential elections they've influenced. They've got
30,000 strong bot farms they're using to influence
conversations. This is Israel doing this. It's not
a secret. It's right on the surface, and
we somehow act like it's either racist or
not there.
As well as the overwhelmingly obvious infiltration of
US tech by Israel.
And in light of the recent pager attack
in Lebanon, that should scare a lot of
us. And I go over this. We go
over Nat Carbine. We go over Comframe,
which is real or to,
Whitney wrote about in her article for TLav.
And just how alarming it is. How clumsy
it is. How they have like a token
American in the company to make the to
allow them to be able to sell directly
to the department in defense. Even though it's
an o it's run by all Israeli intelligence.
I mean, we we are being gamed. At
the very least, the people involved don't care.
You should care.
One last thing before we jump over to,
I think, Iran.
This is something that was going around as
well. It kinda goes back to the point
about partisan misinformation. Now, I like Ozzie Cossack.
I think he's done some good work along
to a few different topics I've seen him
cover.
But, like a lot of people,
for I let's put it this way. From
my perspective, I would find I wouldn't post
this without knowing for sure that this was
real.
But then again, I get why some people
would say, you know, I'm just posting it
to say this is what was sent to
me. I can't verify it. But see, I
hate that. Like, Indus inherits that all the
time. I have nothing to back this up,
but here's 45 tweets about why we can
well, this is what we should all think.
I just it it seems somehow can manipulative.
Now I'm not saying I think that what
he did here is his world war 3
alert. Leaked intel government for a pilot of
an Israeli government plane. I just don't I
think that's bad. It's bad what the this
is suggesting that you know it's real.
And it says something big is about to
go down. The Israeli government is preparing for
a mass casualty event.
Update. An identical add on message is circulating
about the US senators. SIOP confirmed. Believe nothing.
Now this has been updated.
I I shouldn't have read that first. I
meant to finish with that point. That's the
approach right here. Anyway, because the point is
he followed up and he's posted this down
here saying, SIOP has been confirmed. The question
is who and why. Because it turned out
that a lot of other republican accounts were
sharing the same thing. Interesting. Here's lord Bebo.
Follower reached out to him and said, hey,
Bebo.
Keep my handle anonymous, please. I flew a
government contract
identical, verbatim statement.
The point is,
how do we not think about this right
now? Just because it sounds interesting and goes
in the direction we might already think,
People are, especially Israeli bots and what we're
talking about, they are actively trying to or
religious partisan conversations in this country.
There'd be I think there's a deliberate government
paid operation from either side to see narratives
and lie and muddy the waters.
For but it's just your government doing it
for obvious reasons for both of the illusion
paradigm. But on top of that, active individuals
are doing it because they think they're on
one side, fighting a war against the other.
But it's everywhere.
My point is we need to be better
than this and stop falling for these things
and sharing them without due diligence. But at
the end of the day, at least he
followed up like most I think 99% of
these people would not do. I I don't
even see him in the same category as,
like, a lot of these right wing players.
But it simply goes, you know, when he
asks who, and he simply this guy rightly
says, most likely it was done to make
sources of info look unreliable. Pretty basic. Right?
It's not an uncommon thing. It's this guy
clearly is an objective person. It says it's
meant to look like a scoop, and many
are published. Just learn to move learn and
move on.
Exactly. Well put.
But my point is, I think like, let's
just say what is it, tomorrow?
What's the date they were saying?
It says
I thought there was a date in there.
Well, in any case, it seems like right
now people are projecting the next so many
like, obviously tomorrow is what I'll get to
in a second when the US government's perspective.
If something happens the point is this is
I guess I should've read it for the
people that are are familiar with it. You've
probably seen it going around. What the post
is saying is that contractors from who, who
flew to Tel Aviv
were stating that at least, quote, 90 members
of the Knesset, so the congress in in
in Israel, were issued sat phones for emergency
as of Wednesday.
And saying that they're given these basically, that
something big is gonna go down, a mass
casualty event. Okay.
So from Israel,
or at the very least, Israel's aware of
one somewhere.
Okay? Obviously,
it could be real.
My point is it turns out that people
dump this in front of a lot of
Republicans that shared this without due diligence.
Doesn't mean it's fake. But I think if
my gut tells me this is where it
came from. All all I was up to
speed is is to say that if it
happens tomorrow, then they they who knows? It
may. But ultimately, here is a website or
a post from Washington post
from the 19th September, from last month.
It says,
scarred by violence, lawmakers playing for possible, quote,
mass casualty event. And they're obviously talking about
October 7th. Here's the FBI doing the same
thing, saying anniversary October 7th. Hamas attacks may
motivate individuals to violence in the United States.
Whether it's even whether they have any indication
of that, which it doesn't seem that they
do, they're just going, this day may do
that.
It's almost like they want that to happen.
I I wanna put it this way. I
think they want that to happen. I think
it's valuable for what they're doing. They want
to make it seem, 1, like, Jewish people
under attack for Zionism. 2, they want it
to seem like a mosque can influence the
United States. They being, I think, just the
power structure, but predominantly Israel.
But either way,
it's interesting this is being floated. I said,
like, we should false flag watch. Right?
The point is that I think this was
put out from the US side of this,
and then people just took advantage of others
and said they dumped a narrative in front
of others to get this circulating.
Maybe to make good sources of information look
like they don't art or, you know, what?
You can decide for yourself. Bottom line is
my point is you should be careful.
This is one from today or yesterday. FBI
Department of Homeland Security warning about potential threats.
Not because they have any indication of that,
but because they're just going worry like they
do every 911.
Even though they're the ones responsible for all
these things. And then that was the point.
So just be careful.
Even honest people fall for these things. And
bottom line is we just have to be.
That's why I'm irritating the objective at least
as often as I can be. So in
regard to Iran, because that's what I think
this is really about. Because realize, Israel and
the United States are making everything about Iran.
Because guess what? That's what Israel's been trying
to do for decades.
And the US seems to be just mindlessly
going along with whatever Israel drives them to
do, including genocide, by the way. But Elijah
Marnier says Israel and this is a really
important starting point for Iran's topic here.
We just got told
that they stopped everything. Right? Iran didn't get
through. We have a weak attack. Iran Israel's
been making the rounds going. Iran's so weak,
they can't even get through even though they
did. Even though even though they warned them,
they still got through and destroyed a couple
of bases.
The point though is that was it Kirby?
It wasn't a Kirby. It was, Jake chi
Jake,
what's his name in in the US government?
Jake Jake not she Jake Shields is the
guy on Twitter.
The guy whatever. The guy that the from
the white outside of it, then you have
the you Matt Miller, the rest of them
that were saying they didn't get me through.
There was an on unsuccessful attack. Okay. Well,
yesterday,
Israel was forced to admit that Iran's missiles
had in fact hit and damaged 2 military
bases after the satellite images were shown. Can't
hide it anymore.
This indicates 2 points.
1, the US government in Israel lied
when they said Iran's attack was ineffective. And
2, Israel's preparing to hit Iran and is
justifying it.
You see the point? Just like always,
whatever works in the moment. Weak. Didn't happen.
Oh, 3 days later, we wanna respond? Okay.
So they did get through. We wanna bomb
back.
And so it it the point is, who
knows what the lie is? The point is
they're dishonest and will lie in any moment
that it served their interest. So too will
the US government. Quite frankly, so too will
any government, in my opinion.
But think about that for a second and
realize that they lied to you. If you're
on the fence about understanding who might be
on your they all lied to you.
And they wanted you to think that for
obvious reasons, and now they're changing it as
they continue murdering and starving children right now.
Now this this quick point, Casey Wright shared,
is simply apparently, there's a story circulating about
a possible earthquake, but then a lot of
the certain kind of partisan conversation was going,
oh my god. It was probably a nuclear
test.
Maybe.
But let's realize the nuclear conversation. The nuclear
conversation coming up next, which is that everybody
is char suddenly pointing at their raw nuclear
power.
I don't know how many times we have
to talk about this, but it's the same
game as always. The facts have been there
for a long time. Of course, there could
be something we're missing, but the facts are
obvious, even coming from the IAEA and the
US government. I'll show you next.
But all we lean into is what Trump
and
Netanyahu say.
Great thought great plan. Listen to a genocidal
maniac who wants to go after Iran about
Iran.
This point is oh, Casey Wright is simply
making a good point scientifically,
showing some of these documents or some of
these, things he looked up. Was it right
here or was it? Right here. About the
different waves you can see. His simple point
is he assumed the claim would take 5
minutes to debunk. He's well, he said the
earthquake in Iran was 4.1 magnitude. Turns out
the nuclear tests
consistently register 4.5 to 6.1.
This is according to a seismology lab at
Berkeley, but he goes on to say that
the the main difference between the natural earthquake
and a nuclear test is the type of
waves. His point is that you can see
the size the earthquakes dominated by s waves,
nuclear tests dominated by p waves. The seismic
graph seismic graph from Iran is dominated by
s waves.
Seems pretty simple. And you can look this
all up for yourself. It's all documented.
Doesn't make don't maybe maybe there's a reason
they hit it. Right? There's always an opening
possibility. The evidence points to the fact that
it was simply an earthquake.
The point is
partisan narratives jumped on the opportunity to say
Iran's secret nukes because they want you to
think that because Israel is trying to make
this case right now. So let's talk about
that. Okay? So here is the October 5th
article saying Israel is preparing a response
to Iran attack as October 7th anniversary looms.
Okay. So it seems Israel's the one trying
to drive in an October 7th event. Right?
As usual.
But they're saying, Israel's preparing a response.
Well, Iran, as what I was gonna show
you here, has recently locked down their
airspace.
And even then, people are making that out
to be some kind of an indication that
Iran is gonna do something. Guys, let's be
clear about the reality of the legal dynamic,
which is that Israel is the one breaking
the law in every possible part of this
conversation.
On top of that, that they are the
ones that keep killing civilians and bombing individual,
whether it's assassinations that are
I mean, whether you wanna,
whether it's the Hamas leader and you wanna
put you wanna call them a terrorist, if
you are recognized, Israel funds that that group,
or we're talking about people that are not
terrorists, whether Soleimani or Nasrawa who are not.
Israel has continually proven themselves to be the
one that are almost deliberately trying to break
the law.
So all that together shows you that they're
preparing a response even though Iran said we're
gonna do this, gave them a warning, allowed
them to potentially stop all of it but
they didn't anyway, which is probably embarrassing for
them. And now they wanna just do it
back because they're a small childish entity. Right?
They're the child in the room. They're a
sullen child that is pushing back because they
don't know what else to do.
So, we should worry you, as Greg Stoker
points out.
US Central Command Commander
just landed in Tel Aviv.
I don't know how many more examples we
need to recognize this your government is committing
genocide.
He says, can't believe we're stay we're starting
World War 3 over a stupid, violent, narcissistic
little colony.
He says, can we fix North Carolina first?
Clearly not.
Now here's just the post from October 16th.
CENTCOM commander arrives in Israel. It says, Tel
Aviv
oh, wait. This this is the old this
is the older one. Damn it.
Well, any case, the bottom line is
the leadership is in Israel. And I already
made this point about this going back a
long time ago. Remember I told you there
was a 3 star general who was this
Axios reported this, who was helping organize what
what they were gonna do next. Then this
entire time, they act like they don't know
what's going on. We're not involved. And you
can prove that they've got people in the
command room. It doesn't matter because they're all
part of some massive lie.
Now
I wanna make this as clear as possible
because it seems like there's a massive denial
going on around this conversation.
Because we gotta pretend that Trump's the anti
war candidate. Right? Even though that's stupidly, obviously
not the case.
2 times in the last 3 days,
Donald Trump has publicly,
without question,
advocated for bombing Iran's nuclear
facilities. Now realize we're talking about civilian nuclear
power,
not nuclear weapons.
Now, of course, I could be wrong, but
all of the evidence, including from your government,
says the opposite. I'll show you next. But
let's clearly point out that Trump is advocating
without question that that's what Biden should do.
And then it because he doesn't, he's being
weak.
Israel should not target Iranian nuke facilities. What
are your thoughts on that? What should Israel
respond? I mean, that's the craziest thing I've
ever heard. It's the biggest risk we have.
The biggest risk we have is nuclear.
So so craziest thing I've ever heard without
question implies that Israel should bomb the the
nuclear
technology.
And he's criticizing Biden for for saying they
shouldn't. I mean, to make this statement, please
leave their nuclear alone.
Yes. See, right there, he's playing on your
ignorance. He wants you to think weapons.
The state department has said that's not true.
The International Atomic Energy Agency has said that's
not true.
But that's what he does. He's no he's
either,
as usual being misled by the inner circle,
just like his last administration,
or he knows he's lying to you. Either
way should make you very uncomfortable. I would
tell you that that's not the right answer.
That was the craziest answer. Because you know
what? Soon, they're gonna have nuclear weapons, and
then you're gonna have pro So what if
you want to do that one alone, you
might pretend the last part is like, well,
and this is what Trump loves to do.
He gives you an out. He didn't say
they should bomb them. Well, yeah. He actually
did if you just listen to the way
words work. But because he didn't deliberately say
explicitly bomb
it, people just want to pretend. It's very
childish if you ask my honest opinion, but
he said it again.
Ask him, what do you think about, what
do you think about Iran? Would you hit
Iran? And he goes, as long as they
don't hit the nuclear stuff.
That's the thing you want to hit. Right?
Oops. Yeah. Exactly. Now if anyone is still
trying to pretend like he's not advocating for
that, you just you're you're a dishonest person.
Or you're I I mean, I don't know
how you could actually pretend. Like, that means
you're choosing to pretend he didn't say that,
which is simply dishonest.
I said, I think he got that one
wrong. Is that the way you're supposed to
say it? I mean Right. So let's start
a nuclear disaster.
Because bad guy? Like, you have to realize
how childishly stupid that is. Like, he does
he really not understand what that means? Can
we not forget about the Zap Russia power
plant and how everybody's losing their mind about
Russia bomb even though that's not what was
happening? And in a moment, Russia took control
of it. Ukraine started bombing it, nobody talked
about it. Like, it just was it's so
much dishonesty.
You're talking about bombing and even if it's
a civilian nuclear power plant, something that could
cause a nuclear disaster.
Didn't you just get done telling us how
you wanna fight for the Iranian people?
Well, clearly not.
Either way, my gut actually tells me that
I don't think he would advocate for this
while in president. He wants to make Biden
look weak, so he's saying the opposite.
But let's realize that even if he doesn't
mean it, that's a very dangerous thing to
say because Israel's listening.
And they do wanna do that, and they
will.
You just we gotta stop pretending that these
people are not very dangerous or just irresponsible.
The bonus is the biggest risk we have.
No. It's not. The nuclear weapons, the power
Yeah. They don't have any and they're not
the risk that you're talking about. The risk
we have more than anything in the world
is Israel. If not that, all of the
terrorist groups that you guys have created that
you pretend aren't there. Nuclear weapons to power
or weapons. You know, I rebuilt the entire
military jets. Everything I built including nuclear and
I hated to build the nuclear.
But I got to know firsthand the power
of that stuff and I'll tell you what.
Yeah. He's the one that drove us into
the tactical nuke discussion which is bought driven
by Israel as well. We're talking about and
it's we've seen examples of these tested. Many
people think Beirut, the big explosion before this
started was one of those. But we've proven
in the past, even human rights groups, that
they have used nuclear
tactical nukes in Gaza, in Palestine, in places
where nobody's looking. And again, tactical. We're talking
about things that are not and and people
have tested for this. We're actually gonna get
to a point in a minute where we're
showing Israel's currently using depleted uranium in Lebanon
right now.
It's soon to be shocking to you. The
US government gave them to Ukraine. They've been
doing it for a long time. Even though
it's shockingly illegal by everyone's account.
We we have to be totally prepared. We
have to be absolutely prepared. But when they
answer that question, the answer should be hit
the nuclear first.
Oh, yeah. Take the guns. Due process later.
Yeah. Hit the nukes. Deal with it later.
So are you still pretending they didn't say
it? Is it out of context? No. It's
exactly what he said.
So,
the International Atomic Energy Agency
has said repeatedly, and I've talked about this
forever, has consistently monitored and verified Iran's nuclear
program. And its findings do not indicate that
Iran is seeking to develop nuclear weapons.
Now, it says lack of evidence. According to
the IAA,
the IAEA
ongoing inspections and monitoring, no evidence has been
found to prove Tehran is pursuing a nuclear
weapon. Now, they obviously say they don't. You
could argue they're lying. It's a it's a
religious thought while they do not believe that
they should be allowed to do that so
they don't. History is showing that they haven't.
And here we have again, a year after
year. I mean, I go back to the
the, the Japanese guy, the Amano who was
the leader of the IAA.
He publicly said Israel was threatening him to
claim they had them.
He refused. Then he mysteriously died in a
month. Some rapid cancer. That's not I'm not
making that up. And bottom line is even
then, they still have but continue to say
that we can't prove that.
Now that could mean to you that it's
not that maybe they hit it. Of course.
But how many times Israel's been caught manufacturing
fake evidence, bringing in material that has something
on it that they try to put in
some kind of area that they'll test later?
This they've been caught. Even by the US
government, guys.
Just like everything else we talk about.
US, the state department, has confirmed there is
no evidence to suggest that Iran is actively
seeking nuclear weapons. Here's an actual report from
the United States Institute of Peace.
From 2022.
March 8th, the annual US intelligence assessment reported
that Ron has not taken the steps necessary
to produce a nuclear weapon. Now remember, the
idea of the increasing of enriched uranium
was allowed under the JCPOA that they all
agreed to. And the bottom line was not
about making a weapon because you have to
realize, they have to get to 90% to
be able to make the materials needed for
a weapon.
They're not there. Now, yes, they've increased the
percentage over the years because
it's legal under the JCPOA
that they should be allowed to increase that
if the US government pulls out of the
deal, which is what Trump did. See, you
literally did it in order to give them
that opportunity, in order to turn around and
say, see, they're doing it. The thing that
was allowed in the deal that you chose
to break. And if you didn't, it wouldn't
have happened because it wasn't until you did
that.
You see my point? It's just a lazy
argument.
They acted knowing they would create the things
they could misrepresent so Israel could pretend they're
doing the thing that they've never done at
even though they've been screaming 30 seconds the
bomb in 30 seconds for decades.
And they're and right now, they're not even
at the point even remotely close to be
able to make the material needed to make
a bomb
in regard to nuclear bombs.
And if we
snow the state department and the entity designed
to check these things is saying that they're
not,
why only believe what politicians have to say?
Why would we believe what liars have to
say?
This person says,
well, Sam writes, I have zero love for
the gulf sheikdoms, but why would Iran target
them rather than the Israel
in response to an attack? There's narratives floating
around that Iran is actually gonna target our
oil. All because they wanna hype more these
what you intend to get are people that
go on Fox and CNN, the so called
Iran experts who have never been to Iran,
who are experts on the way we're supposed
to misrepresent them, who will just float narratives
like this and say they're actually gonna attack
our oil strategically to make more sense. Okay.
Well, certainly possible.
Seb says I have zero love for the
sheikhdoms.
But why would Iran target them
rather than Israel in response to an attack
by Israel on its oil facilities?
Wouldn't Israel, in spite of its pseudo alliance
with the Sheikdoms, take some delight in Arabs
and Persians hitting each other? The guy says
disrupting oil supplies to the west is likely
to have a greater effect on western policy
than taking out Israel's oil energy infrastructure, which
is a fair point. But the point is
always is to demonstrate the
ceaseless
restraint.
It's not my opinion. Look
of Iran in the face of ongoing aggression
and assassinations and destabilization and regime change from
the US and Israel.
Okay? So the point is to do this
now would be ridiculous. It would be out
of character. And in fact, would be like
just like with Syria and the supposed gassing
attacks that were the one thing the US
needed to go back to. And Assad did
it the last second and gave them the
reason to go. And then later was proven
to be a complete fabrication by Robert Fisk
and the rest. But who cares though? We
got our narrative done. So the bottom line
for me is that this makes no sense,
and all it would do was give them
the excuse to create the war that Israel's
trying to create. They know that. They're not
stupid.
And Sam writes,
why stop at Israel's oil then? What about
actual US facilities? How do you know that
you're not playing into Israel's hands by striking
states that don't hit you? Right. The point
is that Israel is actively driving all of
this stuff.
Brian
Berletic
points out the important document,
which path to Persia.
This is actually very we've talked about this
many times over the years. And it says
the US claims of not wanting Israel to
strike Iran nuclear sites is verbatim.
The 2009 Brookings,
which path to Persia.
The strategy
of maintaining plausible deniability while in fact attacking
Iran including nuclear sites.
Think about that. So it's it's documented. You
can read it for yourself. We've gone over
this document probably 18 times over the years.
And the point is, it's written down clearly
that this is how it would go. So
we should at least consider that that's why
this is happening, especially as we see the
US lie about everything happening in front of
you right now. Now it simply says, as
in the case of an American air strikes
against Iran, the goal of this policy option
would be to destroy key Iranian nuclear facilities,
and the hope of doing so would significantly
delay the the acquisition of nuclear weapons. Now
realize this goes back a long way. Not
long way, but I think it was 20
What's the date on this again? Give me
the chat if you remember what the date
was. I don't wanna take the time to
look it up.
Not super recent. The point is that I
think that even the statements from US have
changed over the years. Either way, the point
is in order to basically
deflect away from the US and on to
Israel. Now, what's funny is Israel's got a
similar policy. In order to get the US
to do it, to deflect away from Israel.
It's funny how they're both playing each other.
Well, I think, honestly, the US
gets abused and manipulated a lot more by
Israel, but that's my opinion.
Overall,
it's important to recognize that this is a
long sought agenda.
And,
remind you, from the very thing you would
identify as the deep state, any other context,
as a Republican,
and Trump is guiding this agenda right now.
Just like Kamala would, despite who regardless who
will get in power, they're both gonna do
the same thing because it is the government
agenda.
And you're falling for one that wants to
pretend to be something different.
I might as well play this right now
since we're already pretty long anyway. I think
it's a good time to you just saw
it, but I think this is a good
time to play it for those that might
not have.
Oh, actually, I think I've got it set
up. Oh, you got it right here.
I frankly think that crisis initiation is really
tough, and
it's very hard for me to see how
the United States,
president can get us to war with Iran.
Which leads me to conclude that if in
fact, compromise is not coming,
that the traditional way of America gets to
war is what would be best for US
interests. Damn right. Some people might think that
mister Roosevelt wanted Always what it's about. Not
human life, not human rights,
not international law, whatever's best for US government
interest at your expense. Get us into World
War 2 as David mentioned. You may some
people might think that mister Roosevelt wanted to
get us into World War 2 as David
mentioned, you may recall we had to wait
for Pearl Harbor.
Some people might think mister All black. Wanted
to get us into World War 1, you
may recall he had to wait for the
Lusitania episode. All black. Some people might think
that mister Johnson wanted to send troops to
Vietnam, you may recall we had to wait
for the Gulf of Tonkin episode. False flag.
We didn't go to war with Spain until
the USS,
until the Maine exploded. False flag. And may
I point out that mister Lincoln did not
feel he could call out the Federal Army
until Fort Sumter was attacked, which False flag.
Listen. Is why he ordered the commander at
Fort Sumter to do exactly that thing, which
the South Carolinians had said would cause an
attack. Well, to be clear, different. I wouldn't
even label that as a false flag, but
it's the same dishonest logic.
False flag would be more so of
using attacking pretending to be somebody else to
drive their response. Either way, the point is
they wanted the outcome. They wanted that, so
they did the thing they knew they would
use, then they could use that to jump
the door. Same with the Pearl Harbor conversation.
Right? More or less of less more so
that than a false flag, but the same
dynamic where you know it and you allow
it. Like, that's there's a that's the myhop,
myhop conversation. Let it happen on purpose. That's
what we're talking about here, guys. And we
need to be real about this. This is
not fake. These are laughably discussing the reality
of our own history. This is happening now.
So if in fact the Iranians aren't gonna
compromise,
it would be best if somebody else started
the war.
But I would just like to suggest that,
one can combine other means of pressure with
sanctions.
I mentioned that explosion
on August 17th.
We could step up the pressure.
I mean look people, Iranian submarines periodically go
down. Someday one of them might not come
up. Who would know why?
We can do a variety of things if
we wish to increase the pressure. I'm not
advocating that but I'm just suggesting that,
it it it it's this this is not
a a either or proposition of, you know,
it's just sanctions has to has to succeed
or other things.
We are in the game
of using covert means against the Iranians.
We we could get nastier at that.
I I just saw somebody make a meme
or try to with that. So it's a
good idea. That's one thing. I'm surprised we
haven't seen memes with that. There's probably a
reason why we don't. But that that shot
right here where he's,
right here. Where was it? My
You know? One day, a submarine might go
down, then it will come, like, come back
up. Who would know why?
Let's see if I can grab it right
there. I see. Okay. Clip that out right
there. Get that image. Let's start making a
meme. Let's get this viral. Right? Like, this
is important. Like, the idea, like, oh, maybe
not or, you know, like, a fall a
fall whatever your funny thing about it is,
make it revolving around false flags or, you
know, US policy where it's like, oops. We
didn't know. Nord Stream pipeline. You know, like,
that kind of thing. I would love to
see that go viral. And then we could
make sure we then tie it back to
what this is about.
Right? The the joking narrative about how we
can savage sabotage a submarine. Who knows why?
It's like, this is who we're dealing with.
Not the left or the right, but your
government. Now, realistically, this is a think tank,
but it's the revolving door. It's it's same
thing we see in every concept. Concept. Context.
Excuse me.
They I mean, they're doing it everywhere. Now,
unfortunately, I'm realizing that I
I'm gonna have to cut this short today,
not right this moment but there's a lot
I want to get into still but we
might I'll just push over the next show.
But to wrap this on this this Iran
part,
this is it's just crazy to me what
how how this kind of sudden oh, I
guess I mean, I don't even wanna go
there. Whatever you think is going on with
Jordan Peterson has shift into this religious perspective
which seems to be overtaking a lot of
this right wing conversation. It's a very weird
and artificial thing. Now I'm a Christian.
The way this they're weirdly, like, blinded towards,
like, the Zionist perception of Christianity.
It's very strange. And then, like, blindly supporting
Israel as they murder children? How in the
world is that Christian? Either way, here he
is going, beware of Iran. Beware of Iran.
That's Jordan Peterson. A guy who used to
be so obviously logical and back based. And
here he is driving
me I mean, just to be clear,
beware of Iran is a dumb thing to
say for any contact with all the stuff
that we can easily look up. But here's
what he's tagging.
Emily Schrader,
this infantile manipulator who is just blatantly dishonest
all across the board. And here's what she's
saying. This is the world's biggest sponsor of
global terrorism.
Oh, is he? You mean the group that
was attacked by ISIS
twice since October 7th?
But I thought we were told ISIS is
the live the obvious entity. Isn't that the
biggest threat? Okay. If that's not the biggest
terrorist group we're talking about, what is then?
Because you're not saying they're terrorists. You're saying
they're sponsors of terrorism. So what are we
talking about?
Even if you wanna pretend, which is not
the case, that they fund Hamas, no. That's
Israel. Or Hezbollah, which is not an Iranian
proxy.
Even if you add them all up, that
doesn't even come close to what we talked
about with ICE. You know what? The point
is, it's clumsy and there's nothing to back
it up. This is a group that's been
fighting the group that you guys are funding
and creating. ISIS, Al Qaeda, moderate rebels,
destabilization, overthrowing,
raping, pillaging, and robbing. Libya, Syria, Africa,
Everything. It's embarrassing how obvious it is, and
all she can do is just keep repeating
narratives.
Biggest state sponsor.
And goes on to say he is responsible
for the destabilization of multiple countries. Really?
Are we really trying to pretend that Iran
is responsible for the destabil I mean, I
it just blows my mind that again,
just like with the genocide, the people who
are gobbling this up are scientists,
politicians, and people who have a political interest.
I don't think anybody with a brain is
gonna pretend this makes sense.
Most of the left is able to acknowledge
that the I mean, millions of of deaths
post the world the war of terror and
the open destabilization
of countless countries, more than any other state
or terrorist organization
in the world.
That's the US government with Israel's open support.
But she says multiple countries in the Middle
East and numerous proxy. All she's talking about
are the groups that Israel's bombing. So you're
destabilizing those countries and you pretend that you're
doing that to stop them or save them.
And the groups that you keep screaming are
their proxies, which they're not.
And I've gone over these explicitly on this
show. So is Robert. There is nothing to
back this up. They rely on flimsy allegations
from US State Department or intelligent entities that
do not prove anything.
Or for like, how about for instance, like,
Soleimani? They love to make these claims, and
Trump used them to justify murdering him under
a guise of diplomacy in an allies' international
airport, Technically, an occupied territory's international airport.
The point is that how he killed Americans.
No. What they did was defend against the
illegal invasion of American
troops into Syria,
then went on to actually fight ISIS while
you were arming and funding and moving them
around.
But they loved to go terrorism.
Because of what? Defending against an illegal occupation?
Well, same points.
But they rape and murder and kidnap. Are
you talking about Israel right now? Because I
think that's what the most obvious point is.
The rape, the murder, the kidnapping. I mean,
that you are talking about Zionism right there,
but they wanna pretend it's only Iran. But
look. All these governments are potentially problematic and
are not are criminal to me to make
before you jump to conclusions about me defending
1 versus the other. I'm simply pointing out
that this monster is pointing at another government
as if they're doing what they are actively
doing right now.
Now anyway, the same nonsense. The whole thing.
The point is this video goes on to
say,
I'll lock the flood. We're talking about October
7th. Okay? And he says the operations
that took place
around this time last year
were a just logical and legally justified international
action.
That's true.
Same thing any international lawyer will tell you.
The same thing I'll play Wilkerson telling you
next.
You know why? Because it is. It's a
legal act of armed resistance. The crimes that
were committed around that were not. Just like
in any war we've talked about. Just like
the illegal war in Iraq or the illegal
war in Syria or the illegal war in
Afghanistan
or the illegal war on and on and
on and on. And every single case, we've
got a litany
of horrible crimes. Rape and torture.
Okay. So if we wanna put if that's
the case, then that's an invalid war. Right?
Then, yes, if you wanna be consistent with
your logic. The point is, though,
well, 1st and foremost, those were illegal wars
in and of themselves.
So it's not a technically, it's not a
good point because the US government is committing
legal wars everywhere. They don't have the legal
right to defense. The point though is that
Palestine does.
Syria does.
Afghanistan does.
Iraq does.
All of these countries have the legal right.
Lebanon does because they're illegally occupied by every
single metric of international law.
Right? So the point is that they do
have that right. But just because crimes were
committed,
doesn't mean the entire act of resistance is
invalidated. That's the point I'm making about the
other wars. They don't apply that logically consistent
to anything else they're doing.
So just to be clear, there's no denying
that. No matter how much that bothers you
or insults you, I'm not saying that when
a Hamas member kidnapped a child, that is
somehow legal or okay. It's not. They should
be held accountable for that. But all the
rest of you're gonna highlight is up in
the air around whether Israel killed them or
it was them. I'm not saying they're not
capable of killing them. I know they are.
Hamas.
Especially since we know they're funded by Israel
and you have to care about that.
But reality is that Hannibal directive was ordered.
We know that as Israeli media has told
us that. Then we know that they bombed
them as they went. They've been bombing them
while they've been in Gaza, and they've been
making sure most of them don't come home.
Their own people are saying that.
Kinda changes it when you know all the
facts, doesn't it? He goes on to say,
and the Palestinians were in the right. They
were, legally speaking. And it says and they
all that says, god is great. God is
great. It's funny. I love to make that,
just like everything else, a terrorist thing. It's
it's like me saying praise God. That's all
it means. And it goes on to say,
Khomeini is our leader.
Death to those against the guardianship of the
Islamic,
jurist.
Now, this is the point they love to
hype And I've made this clear and it's
it's not my opinion.
He goes it says death to America, death
to United Kingdom, death to Israel.
Now first of all, for all I know,
that's not even what they said. I'm not
it doesn't even matter to me because even
when they do say that, they themselves
have made it very clear in many interviews.
I mean, frankly, let's real let's be real.
I'm willing to bet you if you translated
exactly, that might not even be exactly what
they're saying. It's simply that this statement means
death to America. But even if it verbatim
says that, they have made it clear. We're
talking about the government.
We're not talking about the people.
Now, of course, just like Israel pretends they're
fighting for the Lebanese people, but they're not.
They could be lying. That's being consistent.
But the reality is their actions have shown
otherwise. We are fighting the government. The government
of Israel, the government of UK down with
them. And by the way, a lot of
people in these countries are starting to say
that these days whether you agree with it
or not. So for them to frame this
as terrorism is disgustingly dishonest.
And there's Jordan Peterson falling for it because
he's got this
universe sized blind spot right now for Israel.
Or
he's never been honest.
I frankly think it's the former. I think
that he got pulled into some idea that
he found some religious awakening and maybe he
did. Because I I think that's a good
thing if he didn't get trapped by the
idea of the Zionist Israel perspective, where he
thinks that's somehow this foundational entity of, like,
all religion
as they're murdering and starving children to death.
Because that lines up. Right?
Caitlin Johnstone says, but if you in case
you haven't figured it out, quote, terrorist organization
is a completely arbitrary dis designation, which is
used as a tool of western narrative control
to justify war and militarism.
And in fact, it just means disobedient population
who needs bombs dropped on them. She's not
wrong. It's exact I mean, it's a they
more I mean, almost
blanket statement.
Whoever they call terrorists are almost never actually
terrorists, and the people that they fight along
side are typically the ones committing terrorism.
Now Kim Iverson, this this is, the one
we just referenced before. Saeed Mohammed Marandi speaking
with Kim Iverson. I wanna play this clip
before we wrap.
And then, by the way, this is what
just got,
Rachel Blevins censored. Maybe Kim will get sent.
I hope not. But it will show you
what we're talking about.
Anybody willing to objectively hear the facts on
this story because it is objectively obvious
seems to be getting shut down. You know
why?
Because it's obvious.
I mean, Iran is a nation of 90,000,000
people, almost 90,000,000 people. Israel has about 9,000,000
people.
So there's a massive difference here in population
and in arsenal. There is no way Israel
could win. As much as there's a lot
of talk of Israel could beat, you know,
defeat Iran and all. I mean, that is
just insane talk to think that 90,000,000 people
are gonna be overwhelmed by 9,000,000 people. It's
just not going to happen. The terrain size,
Iran is huge in comparison to Israel. It
doesn't take much to target a tiny country
of 9,000,000 people. So I don't see how,
this would, you know, a war maybe if
if Israel has nukes and there's a worry
of that, of them dropping nukes on Tehran
or something, I
100% they have nukes. It's not up for
debate. I was actually gonna go over that
at the show today but I'm gonna push
it off to the next pro I'm gonna
try to do it tomorrow. But just to
be clear, there's no question. They've accidentally made
that clear, like, 7 times. It's not a
it's it's embarrassingly obvious.
I suppose.
I mean, what is what's Iran's deal? Why
is Iran not really bad? Do are they
not able to, or do they not want
to?
Well, Iran has done a lot. I mean,
all of the defense capabilities of Hezbollah, which
have not been revealed. They have huge missile
arsenals and huge capabilities that are all underground
and they're all touched.
And the infrastructure in Yam in Lebanon,
alongside
Gaza,
the tunnels in Gaza, that's a huge investment
and a huge that was a huge project.
And the same is for in Yemen and
Iraq and Syria. So
Iran Iran has put a lot of effort
into this, but I I think this strike
was
a strike where Iran intended to hit Israel
very hard, and I think they they hurt
Israel very badly.
I think Israelis are going to hit back
at Iran,
but the Iranians have said if they do,
they're going to hit back even harder. And
Iran has a huge arsenal of missiles
and the drones because they've they've they've created
all these underground
cities
full of missiles and drones.
When the Americans invaded Iraq and Afghanistan, this
all began because Iran was preparing itself for
an eventual war with the United States.
Though they have far more than enough
to deal with the Israelis, this is not
a battle that the Israelis can win. What
this what Netanyahu is doing is he's desperate.
He wants the Americans to enter the war.
So the answer to your question is why
would Israel do this? Because they want the
Americans in. Why are they invading Lebanon? I
think it's partially ideological because of the people
around Netanyahu and his government. But Netanyahu is
desperate to expand this war to get the
American remember when I was saying A 100%
agree with that, but don't miss the first
point he said right there. Roberts pointed this
out. That there he's being driven
almost out of out of his own control
by the Ben Gavir Smotrich, extremist, Zionist element
to go after pout Lebanon. They want Lebanon.
They want they covet that territory.
It's very clear. So that's one part of
it. And I don't think Netanyahu even has
control of that anymore. But secondarily,
it's because he wants if the US does
not get involved, they're they're already losing, and
they might lose either way.
They don't care about western brands
and west electronic devices being made by
Americans or Europeans becoming discredited or people moving
away. They don't care. And now they don't
care about American lives. They want the Americans
to get into the war,
to fight Iran. But this is very dangerous
because if the Americans get into a fight
with Iran,
Iraqi resistance is going to
kick the Americans out. Which by the way
has already been shown. Dan Cohen was just
talking about this. We've already seen Iraqi,
respond like, militia action, which is I mean,
like, I think that's on the precipice right
now. I don't know what the US would
ultimately do if that there was enough support
for that push because legally speaking, they've already
been voted out. Their own they already voted
them to leave and they just disregarded it.
But they said, we should respect your sovereignty
though while ignoring their sovereignty.
But there is a rising effort to push
out the oppressor.
There there will be war in Iraq between
Iraqis and the Americans because they're very sympathetic
to Iran and pal and Palestine and Lebanon
and Hezbollah.
But, also, all the bases in the pros
for US bases in the Persian Gulf will
be swept away. And those countries that host
them will be swept away because they'll be
seen as hostile. So oil and gas, that'll
be all gone. And if people think that,
no, the Americans can beat the Iranians in
the Persian Gulf,
I just I prefer them to the Red
Sea. If the Americans can't defeat Ansar Allah,
then they really have no chance Yeah. Against
the Iranians for sure.
Right. It's a fair point.
Right? I mean, I mean, a lot of
the things he's saying there is half the
reason why a lot of people in the
US will just automatically argue that they're the
bad guy
because they see that as somehow a threat
to their really, to the government's interest that
you've identified as your own for some reason.
End of the day, what they're doing is
illegal.
Bottom line. This idea that Trump drives strength,
peace through strength really just means might is
right. He's just trying to convince you that
them being powerful is more important than law.
Everything they do shows you that. It's rampant
lawlessness.
Don't fall for it. Don't be small minded.
Recognize what they are is a detriment to
US interests in every possible way, and largely
being driven by Israel.
Now this is Jerusalem Post as of today
saying US is to give Israel compensation
if it hits acceptable targets in Iran. I
mean, it is pretty meek and pathetic. Right?
Now, obviously, the point is that Trump,
and I would argue, quite frankly, the Biden
administration
do want that. Like, we just read from
the the path to Persia document.
And this is more so about, sort of,
creating a justifiable,
you know, plausible deniability.
But or or, you know, that's just one
of the possibilities.
And I would argue that makes more sense.
But overall, it could just be this look
at how weak they are in this position.
No matter what they say or do or
want, Israel just does what it wants. The
world recognizes that. It shows you how the
US is just getting dragged along into this
con or genocide.
Or you maybe it's the other way around.
If you think that that one either one
could be possibly the reality.
But this
just demonstrates weakness quite frankly. What will pay
you to not bomb those things?
It's pretty crazy. But either way, it shows
you that that is a possibility, and that
should be worrisome for all of us.
Now I'm gonna skip over this and talk
about I'm gonna kinda rapidly one point I
wanted to highlight just quickly is that Macron
came out and was like, we're stopping arms
Israel. And then Netanyahu stood up and said,
you know, threatened him essentially. Near week, we're
gonna do this, and we're gonna stop that,
and he immediately went back. Just instantly fell
and went right back in line. What a
coward or maybe that was set up for
some reason.
But then, what was interesting is in between
that fact, apparently, they were bombing things. Not
exactly what it says here, I guess, but
dent generally French interests in Lebanon.
So maybe that's why he fell back. They're
gonna start bombing your interest in Lebanon? I
mean, it just shows you they all know
what Israel is.
He stands up and go, we can't help
them, but then they started going after things
and threaten them and they fall back in
line? How do you misunderstand that?
Israel is the problem here. And here's John
Bolton.
You know, somebody we all should trust. Right?
Saying,
Netanyahu is exactly right. Macron should be ashamed
of himself. Right. Because calling for weapons to
stop going to an entity committing genocide
is what you should be ashamed of?
Right? This is what Caitlin he he he's
who Caitlin Johnstone calls the murder walrus because
of his really stupid mustache. Here he is
adjusting his glasses because he's so full of
himself. But the bottom line is John Bolton
is a maniac. He's one of the most
I mean, psychopathic. I was gonna say sociopathic,
but my god. This guy is a maniac.
He's the one that drove the limpet mind
conversation for Iran during Trump's administration based on
nothing but absolute lies and false flag attacks.
It didn't still didn't happen. And that all
came out. And he just no. It's this
is what Trump allowed in his cabinet. How
how much more bet he comes back in?
Bottom line is he's telling Macron,
which I think is a globalist lackey anyway,
that that you should be ashamed of yourself
for momentarily
doing the right thing. We are led by
monsters.
I shouldn't say led. We are ruled by
monsters.
Now, this we're gonna get into the general
point of of of Gaza and what's going
on in Gaza, and we'll go over more
of this pro pro hopefully tomorrow. I'm gonna
play this clip to end from Wilkerson.
We also are gonna talk about some of
the information around
oh, just a quick point about this we'll
talk about tomorrow, and then Lebanon in general
to finish. I just want you to see
some of these because right now it's ongoing.
From yesterday into today, just non stop bombing.
In in what's interesting that the the the
Dahjar, was it? The Dahiya
doctrine, the mowing the lawn. One point they're
making is they're literally bombing that location. It's
Nay Dahjar location in Lebanon and doing that.
It's just kinda grotesque.
But bombing remember, it's like, remember when hot
bombing hospitals was was bad?
Lebanon bombing hospitals. Or Israel bombing hospitals in
Lebanon. There's not even trying to manufacture narratives.
They're just clumsily saying, human shields and stuff.
And we can't prove any of it, just
like with Gaza, but this time we don't
even have the control of it like Gaza.
We'll just say it, and the world's going
along with it. Destroying mosques, right in front
of us.
Here's Blinken saying,
the US is going to send a $157,000,000
to Lebanon. Again, well, North Carolina suffering, but
realize that none of it should be happening
if we think the consistent point is they
should not be sending for an aid, not
just that we disagree with funding Gaza in
Lebanon, but Israel's okay, which you're gonna get
from the Republicans. My point though is that
you're gonna send this over there acting like
this is some kind of humanitarian
response?
I mean, think about how gross that is.
I said the growing crisis, which is what
he called it. Are you referring to the
Israeli carpet bombing of civilians that you are
actively obfuscating?
Yeah. Say that Blinken secretary Blinken is a
war criminal.
You're saying your the growing crisis is Israel
bombing civilians. But here's some money for what
we're allowing and arming.
I mean, think about how grotesque that is.
And then, of course, the point is, as
he's knowingly obfuscates this whole thing, remember, this
is exactly what it looks like to manufacture
refugee crisis and wealth transfer. Don't forget that
when 30 seconds later, they're calling them the
problem.
UN refugee chief, as of today,
calls air strikes in Lebanon
violating international law. But guess who won't care?
The international community,
sadly enough.
Bombing with depleted uranium, according to the experts
in Lebanon. We'll go over that hopefully tomorrow.
Massive war like combat zone or like a
like a fortress,
which is the US embassy in Lebanon.
It's not a joke.
I simply pointed this out with that clip
that are we the baddies.
And it says, look. You you're not the
government. Listen to this, guys. You're not the
government. Even if you're still tricked into thinking
your vote matters, and it should, by the
way, but they've stolen it from you.
Nonetheless, many of us need to ask ourselves
if our government represents everything
we pretend we fight.
If you're really honest with yourself,
the answer is pretty clear.
It's like a death star, guys. We are
the the these are this is the empire,
not the resistance.
And as this last point before I finish,
she says this is the road to the
civilian
International Airport in Beirut.
It's completely blocked off and destroyed. Now this
just adds to the point we made before.
Remember, Israel said, we're not letting airport flights
out because weapons. And then the US Embassy
meekly was like, we won't allow we won't
pay for your flight, but you can fly
out if you want,
knowing that they had stopped it.
So they don't care about Americans. That's pretty
clear. Let's recognize that that's clear because Israel
just killed an American with indiscriminate strikes in
Lebanon.
Maybe they would've been alive if they wouldn't
have been trapped there by their own government.
Or the meek actions of their government while
Israel stopped them. But don't forget that, guys.
They literally
blew the they stopped the ability to get
to the airport, they shut down the airports,
and your government refused to pay for you
to leave through or even use their own
military planes. They said, you can fly out
if you want. But when they said that,
they knew Israel had blocked it.
Think about that for a second. We're talking
Americans in Lebanon, and your government would rather
gaslight for Israel's genocide than save you.
I hope that resonates with some people out
there.
Now we're gonna finish with this, and I'm
gonna get back to the rest later. Now
this is Wilkerson simply pointing out.
What they did on October 7th, they had
the right to do.
I'm sure that bothers people, but the reality
is that's legally the case.
So thank you for tuning in today, guys.
Always enough to too much to talk about.
There's so much to get to. I'm gonna
do my best to get to this tomorrow.
For most likely tomorrow, that's the plan. And
I think I've got a couple of I
got Saw my interview with Larkin Rose. I
might just get that out right away. I've
been kinda holding off because I feel like
this stuff going on in the Middle East,
but, you know, the the genocide they're committing
is obviously taking a lot of the conversation.
I don't wanna be able to miss what
we talk about. It's sort of evergreen, right?
It's about the idea of the illusion of
authority.
But I just I wanna I think I'm
Probably pretty soon I'm gonna play that just
because I wanna may maybe we mentioned something
in there that's rev relevant over the last
week. So that'll be coming your way soon.
And I think I have a few more
things I'm blanking on right now. In any
case, plenty more coming your way, guys. So
thank you for continuing to support the last
American Vagabond. Oh, one thing was the I
wanna make a point about the inter the,
Independent Media Alliance.
Right right now, like we said before, guys,
we're this is all being put together. People
are asking, like, what's going on? We had
a couple panels. Whitney, Derek, and I still
plan on doing our our three one. It's
sort of meant to be like an official
announcement. But right now, we're very close to
putting out the the,
the our online presence of it. Like, it'll
be like a IMA website location
where you can a where go to get
all the people that are involved in it.
It's it's gonna be it's gonna be pretty
cool. And so that's gonna be coming very
soon. We're just making sure it's perfect, making
sure we like the way it is because
there's I mean, really, there's no there I
mean, there's always a rush. There's always crazy
things going on. But I think it's important
with how much it's obviously,
threatening to a lot of entities that are
already trying to attack it. That we wanna
just make sure that everything's there are ducks
in a row, that everything's right. There's no
reason. And, of course, as we've already made
sure, there's no you know, outside of being
able to donate to any of the individuals
like already exist, there's no financial end to
end element to this. And I don't think
there ever will be. That's what we've already
discussed. I think that's important because this is
not about that. And I wanna see that
that give people ammunition to argue plenty of
things. This is about just trying to break
through the mainstream alternative media manipulation of things
right now. So look forward to that. There's
a lot coming your way. I'll leave it
there, guys. Thank you for tuning in today.
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Palestinians
had every right to do what they did
on October 7th.
Israel
has been under the UN Charter as an
occupying power and under Geneva
since 1967.
It has never,
never fulfilled its responsibilities
as an occupying power,
never intended to fulfill them.
In fact, it has dispossessed the Palestinians of
their lands,
of their orchards,
destroyed their homes,
killed their children.
It is an irresponsible
under the law occupying power. Therefore,
the Palestinians
had every right to do what they did
on October 7th.
Every time that f 16 flies over Gaza
and drops that 250 pound bomb and kills
that child,
you are guilty, America.