I frankly think that crisis initiation is really
tough
and it's very hard for me to see
how the United States,
President can get us to war with Iran.
Which leads me to conclude that if in
fact compromise is not coming
that the traditional way of America gets to
war
is what would be best for US interest.
Some people might think that mister Roosevelt wanted
to get us into World War 2 as
David mentioned, you may recall we had to
wait for Pearl Harbor.
Some people might think mister Wilson wanted to
get us into World War 1, you may
recall he had to wait for the Lusitania
episode.
Some people might think that mister Johnson want
to send troops to Vietnam, you may recall
he had to wait for the Gulf of
Tonkin episode.
We didn't go to war with Spain until
the USS,
until the Maine exploded.
And may I point out that mister Lincoln
did not feel he could call out the
Federal Army until Fort Sumter was attacked, which
is why he ordered the commander Fort Sumter
to do exactly that thing which the South
Carolinians had said would cause
an attack.
So if in fact the Iranians aren't gonna
compromise,
it would be best if somebody else started
the war.
But I would just like to suggest that,
one can combine other means of pressure with
sanctions.
I mentioned that explosion on August 17th.
We could step up the pressure.
I mean, look people, Iranian submarines periodically go
down. Someday one of them might not come
up. Who would know why?
We can do a variety of things if
we wish to increase the pressure. I'm not
advocating that but I'm just suggesting
that,
it it it it's this is not a
a either or proposition of, you know, it's
just sanctions has to has to succeed or
other things.
We are in the game
of using covert means against the Iranians.
We we could get nastier that.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Thursday, October 3, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today. We're gonna
be following up on what's going on in
Lebanon, the overlap with Iran, the important kind
of coverage of how this is clearly continuing
to escalate.
While it seems that many parties who are
typically called the terrorists in the room are
the ones that are trying seemingly every possible
way to pull this back from the precipice.
And Derek put up a a really great
article today that we're gonna point to. But
we're also gonna discuss something in the latter
half of the show
that I just mentioned briefly the other day.
And eve the discussion around North Carolina, the
the lithium conversation, the storm,
I'm gonna cover this in the latter half.
And to kind of let's one of those
types of with the
coverages we had in the past where it's
like, you know, this is what's being put
forward. Let's get to the root of the
point. Let's let's let's look at the facts.
What can we prove around this conversation?
Probably not gonna be what a lot of
the partisan viewers out there want from this
conversation, and there is some interesting things within
it. I mean, I'm the first person that's
gonna be willing to consider even the most
crazy allegations, those crazy possible theories.
But, of course, we're and we're gonna end
up with what we can prove. And if
we don't have things to back up these
claims, then it has to end up where
we don't know if that's the case. What
I always see in these conversations and just
right out of the gate, I'll tell you
that there is interesting overlaps.
But in regard to the the usual things
we tend to see, government land grab conversations
and your possibilities of I mean, really the
biggest thing, as I said yesterday, is malfeasance.
Just the absolute shocking reality of how little
your government cares about you in real disasters,
whether natural or not, and while dumping 1,000,000,000
in the hands of
dictators,
oligarchs,
despot country. Like, just the the obvious
I mean, the diametric opposite of what they
want you to think that they are, that
we are as Americans clearly because they act
this way. Right? But realizing that they'll let
you suffer, let your family suffer, let things
let I mean, just even, like, the infrastructure
side of this. Why these streets are falling
apart because there's a storm? Like, let's recognize
that your government, whether local or or federal,
clearly
is not focused on your interest as a
priority. And I think that's one of the
biggest things we tend to miss when looking
for a larger story. Just like with Lahaina
or East Palestine, there are bigger parts to
the story. But
immediacy of the like, right now, there are
things that should be
local level, parts of the government, or even
from the the the FEMA level or the
Tennessee version of that or with North Carolina,
that these groups are doing things that should
shock Americans or even just the money in
the flow where
how much we pay in our tax dollars,
and how in the moment, there's always some
reason why it's just not there for you.
These are the things that we should care
about, and we should recognize that there are
people that are padding their pockets throughout this
process when they you know, it's sort of
like an insurance company. That you'll spend so
much money over the years pretending that you're
protected, and then the moment that you need
it, they go out of their way to
try to find a way not to help
you. That's just exactly what your government does.
I mean, it's what the model is. But
we're gonna go through all that and get
into some of the other conversations as well.
The idea of the lithium, the I the
possibility that this might have been that
well, first of all, that the lithium is
there and what that might have driven people
to think or do or take advantage of
situations or even the larger point about the
weather itself and whether it's possible, this could
have been manipulated. All of these things, no
matter what you may be thinking right now,
are 100% possible. I mean, scientifically, technically,
just the fact that our government would absolutely
throw you on the bus at a moment's
notice, but does that mean they happened?
Well, I'll let you decide that with the
facts. But it's important to think like that
today. There's so many people. And one of
the so many people out there someone just
gave me a hard time about doing that.
I do it often. My mind jumps and
I don't finish my point. There's so many
people out there who are,
I mean, they just would do would
fool you for the smallest benefit. That would
lie to you and deceive you and get
you thinking they're just for the smallest gain
in that moment. And I mean, people out
there that would love to project themselves as
being the most altruistic, helpful you know, there's
a lot of manipulators out there. Question them,
question me, question everybody. That's how we have
to be. But we have to realize in
all of this that there's a lot of
other dynamics going on in any time. And,
I mean, literally any time you see a
massive partisan
focus,
at least acknowledge that means that you're guaranteed
to have people using that. So that doesn't
mean that has to be fake. It it
could be, like, with the larger possibility. But
when you see this weird focus, whether left
or right on any story, my point is
that you will have the people within that,
the individuals online who just wanna get clicks
and shares, the people in government that wanna
get some benefit from funding or lobbyists because
of this story, you will always have people
who try to make take advantage of your
suffering for their benefit. And that that's my
point is the moment I started to see
this get weirdly focused on and then all
of a sudden, you like usual, the usual
characters out there start cobbling together narratives and,
you know, we saw it with the with
the Trump shooting scop discussion. We were 14
stories down the road before we even knew
the base facts about what was going on,
and that's, I think, by design. Again, as
always, we should never shy away from asking
those questions, but when we start to realize
that we're digging into the theories more than
even caring about the facts to begin with,
maybe we should see that we're being misled
or consider that that's not in the interest
of the truth. But I'll leave it there
to start. But,
it's important, I think, that we don't lose
sight of how important the larger worldwide dynamics
are.
Now you can obviously decide what you think
is most important in your life in this
moment or just decide that you just simply
don't care about other things or I don't
care what's going on in the world. That's
completely your prerogative. And, really, that's I mean,
it's not for anybody to say is right
or wrong. It's up to you to decide.
But I think it's objectively important that we
stand back and because there's a lot of
this kind of partisan push right now to
say, oh, well, why are you like, for
example, Kim Iverson is, I think, doing good
work around Israel, but she talks about a
lot of things. For some what's funny is
that the people that don't like that she's
talking about Israel tend to frame it as
that's the only thing she thinks matters in
the world. That's just not true at all.
I get similar points,
but as we will see today in Polanyi
shows, there's a lot of things we talk
about. But I think what's interesting is what
that's really showing you, at least as I
see it, is that's something that they will
never talk about. And And that's why they
wanna frame it that way as you see
her talking about plenty of other things, but
they seem to never highlight that. Or the
conversation of funding about North Carolina and everything
else. A lot of the right wing conversation
is saying, well, all this to Ukraine, but
only this for them. And then where are
they leaving out the higher number that went
to Israel and has always gone to Israel?
It's interesting the omission there. But just recognize
all the diff you know, the overlapping discussions
for a lot of these things, but how
the point being that people will always try
to manipulate you within these stories to benefit
themselves.
But we're gonna start with the overarching
Lebanon
worldwide conversation, Israel, the the growing threat,
and how this matters to your life. What's
going on in Lebanon or just the fact
that these are human beings in the world
that are suffering using your tax dollars, but
even if they weren't,
this should matter. This is an objectively worldwide
important story because of what's happening. Now if
we argue that, well, these
imaginary lines we call borders, even though there
is the the point being that we should
care about,
you know, cultural differences. I mean, these things
all matter, but let's realize those are imaginary
lines based on governments and politics and so
on. The point being if we pretend that
this makes you know, anything within this line
matters to me more than anything out there,
Again, it's up for you to decide, but
I would argue that we should stand back
and think to ourselves,
shouldn't it matter that hundreds of thousands of
innocent people are being murdered
and then comparing that with something like this
and even say, like, because this is local
for me, comparing the two things, one's objectively
more important in the world.
Now even that saying that's probably gonna bother
some people, and I don't really know why.
I think it's obvious that this is a
monumental story. So I'm just saying that in
the context that let's stand back and make
sure we don't get pulled in to some
hyper focused partisan story while there's a even
from an American perspective.
I I would argue that even, like, other
the lithium conversation,
the possibility of manipulation of weather, these are
huge stories. But that even just the malfeasance
of the government, that's a huge story. But
even that in and of itself,
I would argue that there's objectively more important
things right now happening inside the United States
that get less focused because of the partisan
over you know, the the like I said
earlier, the idea that weather itself becomes this
big hype story. Fox News is just going
wall to wall coverage on the death and
the suffering and it's just like that's that.
I find that kinda gross, personally.
Anyway, so I'll start off with the point
about a couple
of scattered points I wanted to make sure
we included, and then we're gonna start right
off with the updates on what's going on
around Lebanon and, of course, the fact that
an American was just killed in Lebanon, which
is where I wanna start today because of
how
as always, it should not matter
more than an American was killed in any
context than anybody else. Is despite the unfortunate
sad the the fact that that is an
what we're forced to let's put it this
way. The way that the western media would
constantly put forward as the case. We're not
even saying it half the time, but clearly
we all see that. That's not the case.
Human life matters no matter where or how
who what they look like, what the religion
is. But what's important to see in this
context is the US government's taken action that
has allowed this to happen.
And then bigger for the
people acting like one side or the other
is more important for America.
I mean, both of them are doing that,
but obviously one is the one acting like
make America great again. The point being is
that this idea
is very contradictory when you see that they're
supporting a group that just murdered an American.
Murdered an American, an innocent American, as well
as a lot of other innocent people, both
Lebanese and Christians and Jews and all sorts
of people.
And they are more important to them to
focus on supporting the government of Israel than
to acknowledge that that is something
that I mean, you can't call that America
first, can you? And I think that's a
really interesting contradiction, and I think a lot
of Republicans are having a hard time with
that story. Or the hundreds of Americans that
were killed in Gaza, none of them seem
to care about or any of the American
politicians seem to care about.
So first,
I wanted to give a shout out to
an upcoming event
that I'm looking forward to. This is gonna
be November 1st. Well, technically the second, but
I'll be there in the first. It's the
Voluntarism
Conference.
Now this is being put on by,
Etienne.
I I've always I've always I I know
his his other name, but, De La Boutin
Square, I think is how he says it.
But he's a great guy. Really, really in
insightful. I mean, I've met him a lot
of times over the years in different events,
and this will be the first time I'll
be able to join one of his. And
you'll see as you see, Derek will be
there. Corbett, I think, is doing remote, but
he'll be there speaking.
Larkin Rose, who again, I have yet to
play our interview, but for obvious reasons, I
just don't want it to get buried by
what's going on in the world because it's
sort of evergreen, what we talk about, just
the idea that voting and authority are illusions.
Anyway, I'm gonna be doing an interesting event
here. Now one of the reasons I wanted
to do this when I as I I
I it's important as much as I don't
label what I think, and I think that's
I actually think it's important not to because
you get forced into kind of boxing yourself
in. I've got opinions that stretch all around
left, right, middle, or anarchism, libertarian, you know,
it's I think that's how it should be.
I think you can I I think you
can align with different opinions? And sometimes you
that's why these kind of
categories evolve over time because you realize, well,
people that think this way tend to be
in this sort of category. But realizing the
more you grow, the more you realize that
there are differences and nuances and sometimes you
do agree with what this person might say
in this category, but you get the point.
My say in saying all that, I want
people to know that I very much, as
I'm sure you all do by now, am
leaning far more towards the point of anarchism.
The idea that authority and government in and
of itself are bad. Or the idea of
of agorism or volunteerism or the idea of,
you know, peer to peer exchange. Like, we
don't need some authority telling us how to
live our lives. And so I wanted to
I wanted to make sure that I
did that scene. And so not just being
able to speak, I'm gonna be doing a
behind the scenes sort of all day event,
which I'll probably regret signing up for because
it's gonna be longer than even my show.
It's gonna be at least I think so.
It's gonna be the whole event. So as
the event's going on, I'll be behind the
scenes doing like a green room interview with
each one of them before they go on.
As well as doing some like
live kind of walking around the audience, like,
you know, kind of the back surround kind
of thing, which can be kind of fun.
That's a new thing for me. And and
it's gonna be
as well with me doing other content to
my own, so I'll be interjecting parts that
I have to say or interviews I'll be
doing around the side. And on top of
that, the point is it'll all be free
because that's I think that's important for because
it'll be going through TLav website and so
on. But you've if you wanna sign up
for the event, which will be behind a
paywall as as they've decided, you'll be able
to sign up using a code that I'll
include, which I think is right here, Ryan
5, and you get to have a discount
to join the event. But that'll help TLav.
Right? So whatever you wanna do, you can
join me. You can watch our event and
and engage with this and see kinda part
of what they're gonna talk about. But if
you wanna see Derek's and and how or
ATN and and, James and their different and
Larkin and their speeches, you can sign up
for that if you want to and join
their event. And then come back and watch
me for the rest. They know that kinda
thing. It'll be fun. I'm really looking forward
to it. It's gonna be an interesting kind
of on the fly thing where I'll be
asking questions and so on. So make sure
you check out for that. It's a month
away right now. I'll be chatting to that
as we get closer. And I will have
a page on on Tlev. So, you know,
because it as much as this is this
event, the way we Howard or Etienne and
I discussed it, it's gonna be sort of
a, you know, through TLav event that we're
doing on my channels and it'll be, you
know, so it'll be it'll be fun. It'll
be a really interesting thing. I'm really looking
forward to it. I'm glad he he invited
me and it's Sedona art of liberty.org is
the website.
So on top of that, I wanted to
make sure you saw one more thing before
we started. I think I've already told you
this, but just because I think it's just
funny
how many times we've been censored, which I
I objectively don't know anybody I've ever worked
with anywhere or even heard of that's been
censored as many places I have and I
think that's a subjective reality.
TikTok censored us completely, but I don't know
if I mentioned this so I just wanna
include it. But you can see here's the
website itself or the URL and it just
says this could not be found. I think
I've told you that, but I think it's
funny. Of all places, TikTok. Right? Isn't that
supposed to be the China website or whatever
else? But see, funny how TLab gets censored
by all of them because
I think we're inconvenient for power structures, which
is what we all should be striving for,
not just one side or the other. Another
note is Florida Action Network put an important
statement out. Now we've already talked about this.
Derek has been killing the story from the
moment it started to be like, well before
anybody on any media structure was really talking
about it out for the most part outside
of other than those that have been doing
it like him for a long time. Fluoride
Action Network, again, fan or Fluoride Action Network
being the kind of the driving force for
why this just happened. Again, if you haven't
seen it, they won in court and judge
Chen himself put out a statement saying, you
know, paraphrasing,
fluoride is dangerous for you. K? It is
a neurotoxin. It is dangerous, and it does
affect your children's IQ. Period.
That's important to make sure you understand. It
is a neurotoxin and they just found that
in court, federal court, and the problem is
they fought for the last year to make
sure it stayed in your water.
That really is the moral of the story
and that's terrifying. So imagine what else. And
your my this audience is probably well aware.
But Florida Action Network put this out,
today.
And this is what I want you to
take away from this. This is powerful because
what we're seeing,
whether or not the Arkansas government locally
cares or not, what you're what and this
is my point I make about Israel.
You start to see people recognizing the writing
on the wall. Now first of all, I'd
like to believe that they're just local government
that cares about their people, but you know
how jaded I am about government in any
sense. But the reason I say that is
because whether or not they do,
when you start to see things shift, when
you start to see the world or the
media and everybody else recognize that Zionism is
failing,
not because they exposed it, because they've known
they don't care, they're lying about it. But
now they see that we're calling it out.
The mass movement people around the world, the
growing awareness
is changing. So they go, well, we can't
keep pretending it's a good thing even if
we think that because they don't think that
and they're the people that basically pay our
bills.
You know, that's actually not accurate today, but
you get the point. The influence is what
matters. And so they start changing their story.
That's powerful.
Now in this case, we're talking about, I
guess, sort of the enforcement arm. It's the
government side of it, but the idea is
not the same thing. But in this case,
we're talking about local versus federal is kinda
the point I'm making,
that they're now pushing back. It says one
water district in Arkansas serving more than 5,000
customers has now refused
to add fluoride to its water system as
required by state mandate,
which is technically not the same thing. That's
like a mask mandate. Right? But the point
is that technically this has not trickled down
yet. The ruling just happened. And they're still
kinda sussing out what the levels will be.
And they're just going, okay. We're gonna we're
not we're not complying.
Look at that. A local government,
I will not comply. That's powerful.
Again, like I said in the beginning,
whether you think they care or not, this
will start to trickle up, down, however you
look at it. This will snowball. People will
start recognizing that they're more important to their
constituents
whether or not you think the vote translates,
it's about power, it's about influence, it's about
perception,
so they'll start doing it. You wanna get
elected or rather be you know, again, whatever
you think about it. The point would be
that you start going, hey, I'm the I'm
the underdog but guess what? I'll take fluoride
out of your water. I think Zionists are
killing people. Oh my god, everybody supports me.
And you start to see the politicians see
the writing on the wall. They start doing
the same thing. All of a sudden, the
maniacs out there that have been
in power forever because they total line and
they were you know, the it you do
the right thing, you say the right thing,
right now is dynamic, you get those positions.
But the 1 by 1, when people start
seeing that they get more and more well,
even if Zionists are gonna attack them, they'll
start coming along.
So I just really want that to resonate
for the larger story. Whatever we're talking about,
You're having an impact out there. What you're
doing, what you're saying, even if they don't
care about it, you can force them to
change.
And I think we're seeing that right now.
Now it says as a result, the water
authority has been fined $500 a week, but
they're doing it anyway.
Board chair Andy Anderson said on September 30th
that he had just opened the latest bill.
The fines now add up add up to
a $113,000.
Despite that financial pressure, they're standing firm.
That's actually pretty crazy to me. I mean,
I'd like to believe that they just care.
For whatever reason, the anomaly that it is,
that's powerful.
So you're making a difference. Don't forget that.
Now another point that I wanna share was
this is this is interesting. Now this is
a this is, you know, more of a
pess or, you know,
sad point, bad point, negative point.
It's what we've been telling you.
Now, my perception of the Trump administration, which
in my opinion is the same thing as
any administration, come all abide or whatever else,
but I just see them as the chosen
next step. That's my opinion. But I think
it's very obvious the concerns about what
during COVID 19, the republicans would freak out
about almost every single thing that all of
them represent
if it was a lefty.
The everything. The electron leaning into electronic vehicles
or the idea of of every checkbox for
the great reset or the idea of the
brain machine interface or the idea of surveillance
or ISRA. I mean, every single thing we've
talked about would be a problem if it
was coming from somebody else. But because it's
Lee Elon and Vance and Thiel and Trump,
it's all just ignored.
So here,
Daniel McAdams highlights what, I think this was,
Michael Tracy speaking with the lead for the
transition team for Trump.
I'm only gonna play the first little part
of it. It's about 4, 6 minutes, 5
minutes, 6 and a half minutes.
Is as Daniel McAdams
says, this is all you need to know
about Trump 2 point o. The personnel is
the policy.
He says, after you what you hear what
this guy says, based on this, there is
zero chance he will be putting together a
foreign policy team that is actually pro America.
One of the main reasons because Jared Kushner
is helping find the talent.
Pierre Kushner is an open rabbit Zionist. I
mean, and this guy, he's the one that
was behind the architecture of the ridiculous
deal of the century and it was a
flop. I mean, it was a lie. It
was a wildly pro Zionist.
It was pretending that the current dynamic is
a 2 state solution. That's pretty much what
it was.
So I'm gonna play the first part, so
it's more than just that. It's about the
idea that this is the opposite of what
anybody would have asked for should you have
asked what Republicans wanted before this statement. But
now, because this is how it's designed, you're
gonna hear the same things. Well, you gotta
have people from the inside to fight the
inside. Well, how'd that work last time?
It's,
mister Ludnik. Ludnik. Sorry. Thank you for the
pronunciation correction. Yeah. Howard Ludnik, Cantor Fitzgerald. I
do know that. I recognized you without even
having to look it up. Okay. So you're
the cochair of the Trump transition
team. Is that right? That's correct. So in
the first Trump administration,
a lot of lobbyists got appointed to prominent
cabinet positions. Mark Esper,
defense secretary, for example, was the top lobbyist.
Raytheon, lots of other examples. Is that a
philosophy that you would wanna see perpetuated in
a second Trump administration? Would it differ? What's
the status of that?
No lobbyists
are part of the transition.
So
So just so you know,
I don't believe it for a second. And
you'll hear as he goes on, it gets
a little more abstract.
This is simply how it works, ladies and
gentlemen. You go back and look as far
back as you want. I mean, whether it's
Obama and Citibank or whatever else the point
you wanna make, this is how it works.
If you think for one second they're not
gonna have it's gonna be the it's there'll
be a there'll be a rationale.
Right? There'll be something Trump says that makes
them go, oh, that's why it makes sense
even though it won't. It's just whatever he
says will fill the blank, just like always,
or Biden or Kamala or any of the
rest of them. They do the same thing.
Or suddenly, you don't want these oil
lobbyists on your democrat side, but suddenly, they
say, well, we need this because they're oh,
okay. Well, it all makes sense. That's how
it happens every single time. And in this
case, I don't believe it. You're gonna have
all the same problems just like we have
every other time whether it was Trump or
anybody else. This is not unique to Donald
Trump. This is how American politics works.
So he's gonna go on to make it
clear that that's pretty much a lie. I
don't think so at all. I think we
have
the greatest group
of potential,
you know, people who wanna serve that you've
ever seen. We have the leaders
of America
from technology,
pharmaceuticals,
business.
Oh, great. Defense. They're all Oh, good. Okay.
So big pharma, defense, pharma
so pretty much all the people we don't
want in power. Got it. Technocrats, big pharma,
defense contractors.
Why is that a successful thing? You see,
the problem is that these people wanna pretend
that, you know, this is my point about
is always that, you know, Trump is a
businessman.
He does not do he does not take
it. Look. You read his books, you look
at his past actions, or look at his
last administration. He loves to act like he's
for the small guy and he wants to
bring things back to America.
I can promise you
that if it comes down to a profit,
it will go the other direction.
Or what he thinks is a better business
deal.
And they'll all go, well, yeah. It just
makes sense because it made more money or
whatever. And the point is, well, that's the
exact opposite of what you said we needed.
But now because there's a narrative there, people
in the partisanship lie to themselves. Or rather,
I would argue the people at the screaming
top of the Toonsport politics side of it
do that, and then people on their sides
feel obligated to follow suit. Either way, why
is that what we want?
It's not. I mean, if you listen to
what RFK was saying about what he would've
chosen. It's not that. It's not the leaders
of big pharma in defense. That's not what
we should want in power. But guess what?
That's what it's always in power because guess
what? That's who's in power. It's not it's
not Trump or Biden. It's who he's outlining.
And also remember, he's just the guy that's
putting together transition. He's not the one that
actually chooses. That would be Trump's administration or
Trump himself.
So mark my words. Mark my words when
it happens,
and they'll they'll be a narrative for it.
All willing to both willing to serve. You
saw Elon Musk is willing, right, willing to
try to help and I don't know why
anybody pretends that's a positive thing, but I
guess, you know, the the fun narrative they
built around him is why. Take a cabinet
position? No. I think he'll be an adviser.
Right? And he's gonna help build technology because
he wants the efficiency of the US government.
You've got Of course. Because they know what
he wants. Right? Because we all know what
his intentions are. Right? Then we just talked
about this as I think it was Sam
Hussain, he calls it political mind reading or
media mind reading.
They're just trying to present for you what
to think. You can say he's doing this,
you can't say he wants to do this.
So you can say he said he wants
to do this. To pretend we know what
he wants or what anybody's intentions are is
childish. That's not journalism. Or if whatever, you
know, from his side of it. But either
way, I wanna point out that if he
gets whether it's an adviser or an actual
cabinet position,
they're still there's that's still part of the
government.
So when that happens, which technically, it's already
sort of up in the air right now
as this goes forward, at what point does
that become a problem for him expressing
what he's doing on Twitter?
Now I'm not saying he should restrict free
speech, applies. But from a government perspective, that
changes the dynamic. Right? If you're out there
talking about foreign policy or driving with massive
influence actions around government,
then how is that different than him censoring
people from foreign governments influencing our policy? It's
not. But I promise you there's gonna be
a line drawn where he's just doesn't apply
to Elon, which like everything else.
Amazing people trying to help, and they're all
focused on it. And so we will have
the greatest administration you've ever seen. And it's
really been
it's so much fun. Shockingly fun because everybody
wants to help, and and there's just no
friction. So no lobbyists in a second Trump
administration?
I don't I would not expect people who
are lobbyists
to be a material part. I can't say
none.
Ah, okay. Now we're walking it back a
little bit. I may be some. You know
how it goes. 4000 people joining us. Just
a little bit.
Senior level cabinet positions, let's say. I don't
think so.
And is that a concerted decision that was
made somewhere along the way to sort of
break from what the approach was in the
first administration?
I think we with respect to transition, no
one associated
and as part of the transition is a
lobbyist. So we don't have lobbyists
as part of the transition.
Yeah. Yeah. Except all of the Israeli lobbyists
who are literally dictating. I mean,
share Mary Madelson
is seemingly holding his hand as this goes
along. And he or he himself called her
a lobbyist even though she's technically not. I
mean, depends on how you wanna frame that.
She's not part of some massive she is
a a Israeli oligarch who is funding his
campaign in the interest of getting West Bank
annexation, which everyone knows and nobody seems to
care even though that's shockingly illegal.
My point though is that there's no way
that you can't see this happen. This is
where it's going to go. It's already happening.
And by the way, you just because you
wanna pretend that somebody like Mark Esper, for
example, they didn't call him a lobbyist necessarily
even though he is. It's it's the revolving
door.
Half these people are lobbyists already you know,
or they're currently in a position, there'll be
lobbyists when they leave or vice versa. This
is how it all works. This is your
corporatocracy. Right? This is not what we pretend
it is. Overarching well, at the end, he
mentions Jared Kushner, which is the point that
Daniel McAdams is pointing to. Obviously, that's going
to lean in the direction you think it
will, just like last time. But this worries
me that we pretend it's any different. The
the main point is it really doesn't matter
who they pick. They could pick the who's
who of the worst people you could possibly
imagine, and it'll be good because Trump picked
them. That means he knows something we don't.
And if you think that's different on the
left, you're lying to yourself. It's the same
way it always goes. It's a good choice
because they know something we don't. If they
pick them, therefore, this is the right way.
And they'll do it, like they do every
single time.
But just recognize that. It's all going in
the direction that you expected if you've been
paying attention. And then one last note that
you just have to make you laugh about,
which shows you how absurd everything is. Like,
we live in an actual clown world. It's
not just the United States. World news. And
this is it. This appears to be real.
I mean, I only say that because of
this day this day and age, it just
seems like even corporate media gets tricked by,
like, Pompeo and the rest get tricked by
comedians. It just seems bottom line is this
is being roundly reported that Vladimir Zelensky is
being nominated for a Nobel prize.
I just don't even understand how we get,
like, that's I mean, even Obama had to
push back when he got it because he's
like, I don't deserve that.
It's just this is sad. This guy is
a monster like the rest of them, and
he is actively ahead of one of the
most openly Nazi governments that we've ever seen
in, you know, living memory for like, was
how rather
yeah, I think living memory is the right
way to say that because obviously we're talking
about post World War 2. But the bottom
line is for yeah. Well, yeah. Because right
I'm 83. Mine was born. The point here
is that clearly,
this is not a person that deserves
an a pea a Nobel Prize or a
Peace Prize or anything. He is a puppet
that was put in place by a all
a a terrifying
force that has no interest in anything other
than their own occupation, their own interest, and
he and and then gee, I wonder who
picks who gets nominated. Right? They're just trying
to paint a picture,
Historically. You know what I've said so many
times over the years? History is written by
the winning hand. It's a line I wrote
in a song that's been said many ways
before another long before I wrote that. But
I just think that is the it's obvious.
Right? Whoever ultimately wins,
wars, history, they're the ones that write down
the way you wanna think, the way you
wanna look at how it's that's why you
like, Winston Churchill was an amazing leader. No.
He was a horrible
horrifyingly bad person. But who cares? You know?
Because we write the history. It's not it's
not unique to UK. It's pretty much all
of them. But I think that's an interesting
point to start at. Right? Just recognizing that
everything is a lie. K? So let's talk
about Lebanon first. And I wanna start with
the point of the American that was just
killed. Because I'm not seeing
anything.
Your government's not sending imagine if this was
the other way around. Imagine if there was
an American citizen
who was just sitting in a building in
Israel that was bombed by Lebanon or Hezbollah.
What do you think would happen? Well, we
already saw what would happen. We saw that
with the American Israeli IDF members that they
all they had ceremonies for it at 3
days long of all these discussions when they
were a part of the military fighting
a genocide
or conducting a genocide. But of course, you
can have endless examples of Americans,
whether Palestinian or not, but Americans or Palestinian
Americans who were being killed in Gaza.
Not a peep.
Brian Mast out there? No, he only cares
about Israelis.
Right? That's very clear, he's part of the
ITF. That's an American representative.
Who's literally part of the foreign military. I
mean, this is terrifying that we can't that
we can even pretend that we have to
have a conversation about how obviously wrong that
is. Instead of just going, yes, we can
all see that, we have to debate that
it's somehow
appropriate for them to ignore Americans killed by
a foreign government. Right? America first. Right?
I mean, this should really be a come
to Jesus moment for a lot of people
pretending that's what's happening. So, the Jerusalem Post,
I wanna start with this because we just
talked about this in the la the last
show. They the the Israeli government made a
point to restrict the airport.
K? They restricted the under a guise of
weapons importation, okay, which probably
the prob I mean, you you can call
it a valid claim, but the point is
that that's not all that happens in this
civilian airport, if at all. We're talking about
civilians, both Americans, Lebanese people, even Israelis, people
from other countries that are trying to leave
Lebanon. Right?
And they said
no. And, of course, instead
of, you know, the the American government stood
up and said, no. How dare you?
You can't stop a foreign country from leaving
their own airport? You can't stop Americans in
Lebanon from leaving?
We're no longer your ally. No. Of course.
That's not what they said. The US government
meekly followed suit. And they said, okay. But
we're not evacuating US citizens at this time.
There's a commercially available flight though if you
wanna pay for it, even though Israel's blocking
them from flying out.
That's what happened. That's disgusting. That's the US
embassy from Beirut literally saying, Americans in Beirut,
you you can pay for it if you
wanna leave. We won't help you, knowing that
Israel was blocking the airport.
Think about that for a second. You think
they care about Americans more than Israelis or
or anything? And they're literally letting you stay
there while they allow a foreign government to
block you out as they pretend you can
pay for it, assuming you had the money
to do so, assuming the banks were working.
I mean, think about how crazy that is.
So that brings us to the point of
today.
While they did that, which means that the
US government is explicitly complicit in allowing this
person to be killed because maybe they would've
flown away. Maybe they would've been flown out
had the United States actually done its job.
American killed in Israel's military campaign in Lebanon
says the family
and US lawmakers.
This is from yesterday.
An American from Dearborn, Michigan was killed in
Lebanon in an Israeli airstrike according to the
man's daughter, friend, and a US congresswoman representing
its constituency.
I just this really needs to be one
of those moments for people. And again, it
shouldn't matter any more than the other Lebanese
people that were killed in the same strike.
But this matters from an American perspective for
people that believe in American politicians.
This should make you livid.
Especially since they're not having press conferences about
it. Matt Miller and the rest are kinda
blithely dismissing it like we don't know, we're
gonna investigate, when they never follow-up at all.
Their job,
as they would tell you,
is your security.
American national security.
American interests. Right? Protecting Americans at all cost
unless they actually have to do that in
the face of Israel.
So right, just in case you missed the
point, for the 47th time over,
if it bumps up against Israel,
you don't matter.
Your own government would ignore your life if
it goes against Israel's interests. So maybe we
should ask whether they're even your government anymore.
Let's let's really reflect on how alarming this
is.
Now The Cradle reported, as of today,
1,974
martyrs. Now remember, all that means is people
killed despite
what's his name?
Josh Hawley and the rest of these absolute
morons in congress screaming falsehoods about what these
things mean because they're just grandstanding and trying
to make it seem like when the person
in front of them was just trying to
say, no. There's nuance and those have meaning
and sometimes it could be enough. They go,
no. How dare you not scream the thing
we just told you to say. It means
somebody who was killed. Yes. It could mean
somebody who was acting in military capacity. It
could mean somebody who blew themselves up. Or
it could mean a child that was killed
in their bed.
All of those apply because that's what it
means. Martyrs simply mean people that were killed
in this in this dynamic.
Easy to look up. And that's why the
Cradles reporting it as these martyrs, people that
were killed. Most of them all were I
mean, the vast majority were civilians,
including a 127
children. So those 20 those children were in
that murder number.
And
261 women. And 9,384
injured.
Over 10,000 casualties
since the beginning of this aggression on Lebanon.
Just the most current version of it.
There's no misunderstanding this. I don't think we
need to convince anybody anymore what's really going
on. We just need to make sure we
find a way to stop these belligerent
genocidal governments.
Now, I
wanna include some things from the last show,
in case you didn't see it, that are
really important to understand what's going on. 1,
is that even the Washington Post and other
corporate media are making sure you understand despite
the lies,
they're hitting military targets.
Glenn Glenn Greenwald says every one of the
confirmed missile hits in Israel documented here by
Abbott Hill was aimed at an obviously legitimate
military target. Ask yourself how far Israel has
lost the plot when even the corporate media
that they're buying, funding, lying, threatening,
is calling out that they're not that they're
lying. That Iran is not aiming at civilians.
That in fact, they're just explicitly aiming at
military targets, and then Israel is just lying
about it.
He says there's a fundamental difference between that
and flattening apartment buildings,
UN buildings, schools, and refugee camps.
So not only are is Iran explicitly aiming
at military targets, as Robert covered in an
article, I'll point that in a minute,
but you can prove it. You know why?
Just like I told you before, this is
not Gaza. There are people all around in
Lebanon. People filming, people showing what's going on,
people going after the fact, which I'll show
you today, going where were the tunnels? Right?
Where is the missiles?
Right? If you keep telling us all these
were in where are they?
This is going to come out. There's no
way they can hide all of this. But
the clear point is this is how desperate
they are. They're not they're thinking 10 seconds
ahead of their situation.
So on top of that, as Menchocint points
out, don't forget the one of the main
locations, and these were I think there were
3 main locations they were targeting.
For those that don't know yet,
the Nevatim airbase
is or was, depending on the full validity
of the claim. Some people are arguing it
was completely destroyed. That does seem to the
be the images and the things that I've
seen, at the very least, it was clearly
hit.
But some are arguing it was completely taken
out. But it says is was where Israel
was receiving
American bombs that were killing civilians in Gaza,
Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, everywhere. Which
there's nothing I mean, there's
little else that would I mean, that's about
as military target as it can get.
And then he shows you the means to
the raining down on these locations.
Now Furqan points out that a Lebanese journalist
has gone around, this is as of yesterday
or today, visiting the sites that were bombed
by Israel. And this is the point. You
can watch the whole video and showing you
that there's nothing under there. Now, of course,
this is people that don't wanna see they're
gonna say, ah, he's lying or he's he's
hidden or this has been removed. The point
is this is going to come out. People
will do investigations largely from Lebanon, I imagine.
And this won't be like the Beirut blast
of last time where everyone just ignores what
they show you. This is so this is
a worldwide discussion now that Israel's made that
the case. And so they're gonna go and
show you that there is nothing under these
locations. There's no tunnels. There's no bombs inside.
And you could argue some of them might.
I haven't seen any evidence of that. But
the point is they're bombing, carpet bombing, like
always, entire civilian blocks.
So when you can show that let's let's
even put it this way. Let's say you
go back and look and find here's a
bomb in this one house,
but weirdly the other 7 buildings didn't have
any.
Well, even if you that alone. That's end
of story.
Even if they were to find 1, that
means they bombed 7 full buildings of people
with nothing under them. My point is that
I don't think any of that's there. I
I'm I that's what I think the evidence
shows. Regardless,
there's no way around this.
They just You can watch the video for
yourself, they're just showing you that there's nothing
there.
Dan Cohen points out, as I said the
other day, turns out that Iran is the
most moral army in the world. And what
he's showing you are the facts, which is
that air Israeli air strikes on Lebanon, and
this were this was back on 1st, had
killed 500 people. Just that just that one
day. BBC
dedicated 10 minutes to it.
Iranian air strikes in Israel with 0,
even according to Israeli media, 0 known victims.
BBC evening news dedicates an entire half hour.
There's, I mean, there's no comment needed. That's
crazy.
And here's even c b d CBS News.
US and Israeli officials, both of them, said
there were no reports of Israeli civilian casualties.
Now, what's interesting is you could easily say
that was because they tried to frame it
as they were untouched.
You didn't get us. We won. You're too
weak.
Either way, either it's a lie, which that's
what they do all the time and you're
showing you they're dishonest and they hid their
own casualties to make it seem but I
think it's the reality. I think it's obvious
that there were no casualties. They aimed at
military targets and whatever you think it is,
even Israel said that. So how can you
pretend like this was indiscriminate? That they were
bombing civilian targets? Or that there's any
as moral equivalency
as they love to put in the other
conversation? There's not. There's one side who is
clearly killing civilians at a a rapid pace
and one that's not.
End of story.
Now what the media hides, right, 200 Iranian
missiles, at least that's what Israel is mostly
saying. I think Iranian names kind of said
dozens, which I guess could reach that level.
0 Israeli victims, according to everybody.
The entire west condemns it.
Israel kills over a 1000 Lebanese people in
previous weeks, and they say nothing.
Do you understand it yet?
You get what you're looking at? You should.
Now Philip Proudfoot going into some d information
from today, he says, I want everyone to
understand what happened in the last 24 hours.
Israel completely failed
to illegally invade Lebanon and was forced back
by Hezbollah.
In response,
they dropped chemical weapons on civilians in Beirut
and leveled apartment buildings after apartment buildings. And
bombed Gaza. Right? And Syria, by the way.
We'll get to that next.
And he just highlights the Diah doctrine, mowing
the lawn. Right? What they do this and
a lot of times, it is just because
of petty reaction. That they feel stupid, they
feel slighted, they feel that they're weak, so
they just murder people.
And as low key just recently said on
an interview, I think it was Pierce Morgan,
the point is the the the war is
meant to be how you view a win
is if you end up coming out of
it and you've more people believe your perspective
than anybody else.
And the problem is that they're not. Objectively,
they're failing at all this because everything they
do is causing more people to see what
they are and more people to hate what
they're doing.
But his point is what they do is
aim and murder the weakest of the population.
Right? So they do this, and it's killing
the children and the sick and the women.
That's what they do. That's what is that's
what Zionism is.
And so, dot mowing the lawn, as their
into their own policy,
if you actually read what they say this
is just they they just go in and
mow the lawn every so often. Kill a
couple of people, let them know we're still
there. That's what they would tell you. And
they've said this on interviews before.
So, people down below asking about chemical weapons,
he's talking about white phosphorus. Which by the
way, I even included that image on my
that on my main image for the show
yesterday. I didn't end up talking about it,
which is one of the many examples and
it's it's not even remotely new. Understand, this
has been going on long before October 7th.
Pellon pointing out Israel bombing a health authority
center in Beirut with white phosphorus.
They've used chemical weapons containing white phosphorus on
at least 17 villages in Lebanon just since
October 7th. The Geneva protocol, which prohibits the
use of chemical weapons in warfare, was started
in 1925. Now before these app the people
that try to misrepresent the situation pretend that
you're allowed to use this, well, first of
all,
it's outrageous that that's even, the game they
play. This is a weapon.
This game that you could use any number
of more effective and less dangerous things to
signal or to to light an area. So
they pretend though that you use this at
certain times to signal or light up an
air, but then look, see the images you're
looking at? Well, those are during the day.
And over civilian areas, which means they are
explicitly
illegal. That's that is as illegal as using
Sarin gas. It's a chemical weapon. That's the
point. It may not be as dangerous, but
it is horrifyingly deadly, and it will melt
the skin off children, which it's done many
times. Which is why they use it. You
wanna listen to them talk about it? They've
made statements, guys. The bottom line is this
is not new and it's provable. This is
October 12th from Human Rights Watch. White phosphorus
used in Gaza and Lebanon. And realize, guys,
look at the picture. This is during the
day over a civilian building.
There's no way, no matter what the concept
con
the narrative around it that would make that
legal.
And they know that, they just don't care.
That's why if you read Human Rights Watch,
they're saying this is egregiously
illegal, this is a massive war crime. Use
in populated areas poses grave
risk to civilians.
So, yes, when they use chemical weapons as
a response to hurt people because they feel
slighted, or because they
wanna hurt people because they're losing,
That should show you what they really are.
And let's not forget, on top of all
of that,
Times of of Israel made sure you understood
that Netanyahu
used everybody.
He used, as they reported, this is Times
of Israel, the trip to New York.
The entire United Nations pomp conversation. They used
that to quote
they use it as quote part of a
diversion
so that Nasrallah would think he was safe.
Like I said in yesterday's show, using diplomacy
as a weapon of war. Under the guise
of diplomacy,
murdering innocent people,
which that was the case. This is not
a terrorist we're talking about despite all the
BS you hear from people in the west
and partisan morons.
The reality
is that this is a massive like, listen.
Even if you think he is a terrorist,
this is such an egregious crime. What you're
doing is using the United Nations, using the
guise of ceasefire, which so there's just nothing
sacred. These are terrorists, ladies and gentlemen. That's
what they are. So the the blinking with
how you believe the difference between us is
that we believe in international law, and they
don't. Except you don't though. In every possible
way, you don't.
And again, the ceasefire conversation
was also used, pretending that they were working
towards a ceasefire so they thought something was
changing, or using the United Nations setting. And
where by the way, which is where he
ordered the assassination.
It's overwhelmingly
clear what these people are. And now, Christine
Amapur from CNN, who I have a little
opinion of, had an interview with somebody from
Lebanon, the foreign minister.
And he reported to CNN
that they agreed.
This is a new development as of yesterday
and just today, which, by the way, I
think was already pretty clear, but the do
the new part of it is that Nasrallah
apparently had publicly agreed to a ceasefire,
which I think adds to the story. So
not only do they use the ceasefire dynamic
and the New York UN part as a
diversion,
but they let him agree. They pretended to
agree,
so he thought a ceasefire was in place,
and then they murdered him.
That's what they do. That's why when Donald
Trump invited Soleimani, or rather used Saudi Arabia
to invite him to under a guise of
diplomacy,
he bombed him on an international airport. Who
do you think who do you think drove
that into reality, guys? That was Israel.
Everything about that was illegal. So why would
anybody else take diplomacy at face value from
the US or Israel? Why would anybody not
do the same? Why wouldn't they light them
and then murder them in the in the
because that's what they're doing. Now nobody should
agree with that. Nobody should advocate that because
that is the worst of the worst. That
is terrorism.
Let's not forget where it actually originates from.
But let's realize that this is a big
deal. Now here's a clip that I'll play
for you of a journalist asking Matt Miller
about it. And you get the same wishy
washy nonsense. But let's realize, here's the actual
interview or clip of it from that discussion.
That they know this.
They know what they're doing. They know what
they're covering up.
If this was Russia,
you damn will know what the conversation would
be. They they wouldn't even need to have
any evidence. They would have Israel telling them
Putin did this, and they would scream about
it for a week because they're children.
His foreign minister told CNN
today or yesterday that,
Hassan Nasrallah, before he was killed, had actually
agreed
to the 21 day ceasefire,
that the US had been putting together last
week.
Is that accurate?
So I can't speak to whether he ever
agreed to it and told somebody inside Lebanon.
Obviously, that could be something that happened that
we wouldn't be aware of. I can tell
you that if that's true, it was never
communicated to us in any way, shape, or
form.
And
It's important to realize
what he just admitted right there, as we
already knew,
they were in the process.
K. So that alone is an egregious
it's a crime, but it is a
or sorry. Word for it.
A violation of the of the process itself.
Right? The idea is that they were caught
they were in this conversation. Now I believe
this reality. I think that it was accepted.
I think that's exactly what we already knew
based on the previous information. But
even if he hadn't, the point is that
they were in this process.
So to per to to be of the
mind that in the middle of trying to
reach a ceasefire, that you could be assassinated
by one of the sides pretending to seek
it, is everything we're talking about. Why would
anybody ever enter into agreements with them ever
again?
So all it's so all he's demonstrating for
you is whether or not it was agreed
to, this is a major violation of that
process and a crime. And they know that.
Just you apply the exact same logic and
the exact same dynamic to any of their
adversaries, and you know damn well that Matt
Miller would wax intellectual about it for the
last half hour about how it's a crime
and how egregious it was and how we
can't allow these people to exist
every time.
You guys met with
secretary Blinken, met with Lebanese officials. He did.
We were having a number of specifically discussed
this 21 day ceasefire. That's what she's saying.
So you were there. You guys met. You
talked about it. It was in the process
is the point she's making. We were having
a number of conversations with Lebanese officials as
well as with others in the region. And
I can tell you, at no time was
it ever communicated to us that Hezbollah had
accepted a ceasefire.
But they were giving you confidence. And ask
yourself, do you think they would be honest
with you if they did know that? I
mean, really? Is there anybody in the world
that would bark at pointing that out? We
all know that they're liars. We all know
that they would easily,
blatantly, knowingly lie to you to hide this
for Israel.
It's amazing that that's that should be contentious,
but it's not.
That Hezbollah had accepted a ceasefire.
But they were giving you confidence that they
that they might, but
it not wasn't necessarily from that problem. We
were having a number of diplomatic engagements to
talk about the proposals that we were gonna
put forward. Right. I think all of the
party I mean, what a stupid way to
say that. So you were having meetings with
the other side to discuss what you might
bring?
No. That's what you would do on your
side, and you've come to the table to
discuss the actual deal.
Like, yes. You the point is he's just
trying to really make it sound like nothing
was happening. But the problem is
before this, they were screaming that they were
getting close, and it was it's always the
other side that doesn't want anything to happen.
You see how they they they will tell
you what they want you to hear on
either side of the narrative.
It's only Hamas that won't let it happen,
except we find out today that, nope, they
they you know? I as actually Matt Miller
I should even play that clip again how
embarrassing that is. Matt Miller comes out and
says that we never wanted a ceasefire with
the moss, but the only reason it happened
is because Moss didn't come to the table.
It's like, are you really that stupid? Apparently,
that's the best they can do.
Were well aware of the proposals that we
are gonna put forward, but at no time,
in those conversations,
did we get a message that Hezbollah was
Hezbollah had agreed or was going to agree
to it. Or Nasrallah himself. Yeah. Or Nasrallah
himself. Well, I mean
So here
is today,
ongoing,
indiscriminate bombing of Lebanon.
The aftermath of Israeli strikes in San Therese,
in Beirut.
And it's just it's just cr it's really
shocking that we can just just just going
through the motions again.
Just
oh, where where I mean, where do you
use their missiles, their tunnels, their human shields,
we do even care.
The US government is just allowing genocide,
which we all know.
Just destroying the end of the location.
I hope to God that somebody is held
accountable for this.
Glenn Greenwald points out, and we showed it
just the the other day, Bernard Henry Levy
is saying Israel is not invading, it's liberating
Lebanon.
And as he says, that's exactly what this
same individual, the same swamp creature said about
the invasion of Iraq. We all know how
that worked out. They're screaming about the virtues
of American Liberation. Right?
Or the complex exact opposite. As we destroyed
every or the government destroyed everything in that
country and is still illegally occupying it and
has been destabilizing them ever since and allowing
Israel to do whatever it wants. That's what
it looks like to be liberated by the
US government.
That's what he's saying. He said, we're not
we're gonna liberate Lebanon.
Pro Israel fanatics and US interventionists always depict
the flattening of apartment buildings and killing of
huge numbers of civilians as liberating them. It's
insulting.
Now here is Netanyahu, 22 years ago, and
I played this before, arguing that the US
invasion of Iraq
would have, I guarantee you, he says,
enormous
positive reverberations on the region.
Just like he's saying now about Lebanon.
If you take out Saddam,
Saddam's regime, I guarantee
that it will have enormous positive reverberations on
the region.
And I think that people sitting right next
door in Iran, young people,
and many others will say
the time of such regimes, of such chess
spots
is gone. There is a new age. Something
new is happening. And that is rough speculation
on your part or you have, some evidence
to that effect? You know, I was I
was asked the same question in
1986.
I had
written
a book in which I had said,
that
the way to deal with
terrorist regimes well, with terror was to deal
with the terrorist regimes. And the way to
deal with the terrorist regimes among other things
was to
apply military force against them to The way
we did in, Afghanistan.
The way, for example, I I want to
answer your question I guess I'm running out
of time, so I quickly was trying to
get to we've done, I think, what you
proposed in Afghanistan, yet I haven't seen that
sort of neighborhood effect. Well, I think I
think there's been an an enormous effect.
Oh, has there? Yeah. Because Afghanistan is a
shining beacon of democracy today. Right?
No. But they leaned in with the the
bad guys. Right? The very people they said
they were gonna give real, Taliban's no still
power, or Syria, or Iraq, or any number
of them. They supported the very entity that
we now recognize as the problem in every
single dynamic. Or whether it's ISIS or Al
Qaeda, or the moderate rebels, or any number
of examples.
That's who they are. He's literally telling you
he this is a person who is bull
is driving US government to take action to
its detriment, to your detriment, for the interest
of Israel's prophetic future. That's what it is.
Right on the surface.
And either these people are too stupid or
too bought off or too blindly pro Zionist
to recognize
all of this that's happening. I mean, look
at how much information we have going back
to this point.
One country after another. Or Libya, for example,
over and over for the interest of Israel's
agenda in the Middle East.
The effect was we were told that there
would be,
a contrary effect. First of all, people said
that there would be tens of thousands of
people streaming into Afghanistan,
zealots who would be outraged by America's action
and this would produce a counter reaction in
the Arab world. But I think you're not
saying that when you take an action like
we did in Afghanistan, we're gonna see all
the other countries just fold. No. What we
saw is something else. First of all, we
saw everybody streaming out of Afghanistan. The second
Yeah. Because that's what they want. Just like
we see in every other location, every single
one of them. Right? We're gonna see right
now from the 1,000,000 plus Lebanese that are
being driven out of Lebanon.
They're going to end up coming into Europe
or the United States. Those very people will
turn around and say, they're the reason we're
they're coming in to hurt. It's their fault.
No. It's your fault for supporting this maniac.
That's the reality. But most of them know
that. They love to play it both ways.
We blind support Israel, then we demonize the
the people coming in because of what we
did and how we supported Israel. And it'll
make them out to be the villains. All
of the right wing people you could think
of right now will scream about how they're
middle military age males. And and let's put
it this way though, even if that is
an agenda within it, guess who's doing it?
You're staring at it.
Thing we saw is all the Arab countries
and many Muslim countries trying to side with
America, trying to make to be okay with
America.
The application of power
is the most important thing in winning the
war on terrorism. If I had to say,
what are the 3 principle You you see
where Trump's mindset comes from? Of winning the
war on terror. It's like, what are the
three principles of real estate, the 3 l's?
Location, location, location. The three principles of winning
the war on terror are the 3 w's.
Winning, winning, and winning. The more victories you
imagine, the easier the next victory becomes. Yeah.
How'd that work out? I mean, depends on
how you define victory. Right? He sees it
as victory because he got this country to
bumble in and do its war for it
and has completely, in every possible step, been
to the detriment of American interest. Every way.
Can you I mean, you point out one
example of what any of these wars have
done for the American people.
By their own accounts, it has made you
less safe. Even by American think tank accounts,
there's more terrorism today than there was before
they started this war on terror. Maybe because
it was a war of terror. Sort of
like the war on drugs that actually grew
the problem because that was the point. We
are being played
by this person, but by a lot of
individuals. But the bottom line is if we
don't start recognizing
as Americans that your own government is acting
against your own interest, then we will never
stop this pro we'll get to a point
where I see building right now where we'll
be I don't think we'll be able to
work back from it.
Honestly. I mean, that's just why I I
think this is why they're doing a lot
of what they're doing because a lot of
us are beginning to see through the lies.
So they need to put us in a
position where it won't matter anymore.
The first victory in Afghanistan makes the second
victory in Iraq
that much easier. The second victory in Iraq
will make the 3rd victory that much easier
too, but it may change the nature of
achieving that victory. It may be possible to
have implosions taking place. I don't guarantee it,
mister attorney. But I think it makes it
more likely.
Yep. They're staring at the responsible party.
Right? The just I mean,
100 100 of millions of innocent lives
around the world as they scream about individual
think about how many people from the war
on terror. We're talking 100 of millions of
people that have been killed direct or as
a consequence of their war on terror of
terror around the world, all for the interest
of Israel.
Now lord Bebo points out this this video.
This is of Matt Miller.
It's it's just the it's the hypocrisy. Discussing
the fact that obviously,
the one of the main central things we've
seen is the focusing on civilian infrastructure.
And what he's talking about is how we're
now seeing it again in Lebanon.
And this is the fact that we just
keep dragging this narrative along. Everyone can see
what's happening. And now let's realize, there's not
human shield there's not hostages.
There so what is their narrative now? That
Hezbollah is just forcing them all to stay
there? Well, they really tried to say it
in the beginning, but nobody real not even
the corporate media picked it up. Because it's
ridiculous.
They're just bombing innocent people in in Beirut,
and everyone's just pretending like that somehow makes
sense. And now as they're bombing hospitals
and civilian infrastructure, like everywhere else they're bombing,
he tries to play it like it doesn't
matter.
On on this,
the reports of this strike on,
in Bashura in Beirut, Evernight, which is a,
you know, very residential area.
Reportedly has bottlenecked the Islamic Health Organization,
in which, like, reports say 9 people were
killed. I mean, do you have any assessment
on that or any I don't. Obviously, we
wanna see hospitals and health care facilities protected.
I don't know any of the underlying circumstances
related to that strike, so I certainly can't
speak to it. Because it feels like the
I mean think about even saying that and
then looking at every single hospital in Gaza
being bombed and attacked and destroyed, every one
of them. Some of them are still semi
functional because they've just try continue to work
out of some hole in the ground because
that's all they can do. But the bottom
line
is that every single one of those, every
single one of those, as he'll explain right
now, were obviously illegal. By the way, even
if you believe their claims.
But that's on top of the fact that
we can prove that they've lied about them.
The doctors from these locations here, I'll play
you this really quickly since I wanna I
want you to hear what he says next
in the in in this context. Because what
he's about to tell you is explicitly stated
from international law that it shows you that
even if they were Hamas members, even if
there were that it would still be a
crime the way they conducted this, which you
already know. It's what we've been saying from
the very beginning. But it's important to hear
this again
that there's doctors that were there
from other parts of the world that are
screaming to you that they saw
that there was no Hamas there, and they
killed people anyway. Every single part of the
hospital has been destroyed.
The whole infrastructure of the hospital has been
destroyed. When I spoke to Marwan yesterday, he
told me there were a 107 patients
sitting in the hospital, 60 medical staff.
God only knows what has happened to them.
I think we've seen some of the pictures.
Surgeons I know have been executed,
in the last 48 hours there.
Bodies have been discovered,
in the last 12 to 24 hours with
who have been handcuffed
with their arms behind their back.
And so there is no doubt at all
that that multiple health care workers have been
executed there in the last few days. Ex
you believe executed by whom, doctor?
By the Israeli Defense Force.
Why would they seek to execute surgeons and
medical professionals?
Well, they've been doing it since October 7th.
Over 450
healthcare workers
have been killed. Friends of mine that I
have worked with over the years,
many have been abducted as well, and nothing
has been heard of them since. So there
is no doubt in my mind, and I've
I I I can bear witness from this
from my time at Al Aqsa Hospital and
from talking to people that there's been direct
targeting of the health care
system in
Gaza, direct targeting of hospitals,
and multiple killings of health care workers. Any
death is tragic, but this is not, and
I say again, anyone dying in any sense.
So this is not, and please don't be
upset by this expression, collateral
damage. This is specifically targeted, you're saying, medical
professionals
by the IDF to be taken off and
executed is your belief.
Most certainly. That is my belief.
Have you at any time seen anything that
leads you would lead you to believe that
there had been terrorists who were hiding in
the hospital? Without exception, every single one has
responded to say they have never witnessed any
Hamas militants in the hospitals they have worked
in.
Without exception. Now that's just about al Shefa
he's talking about. But he's that's Nick Maynard,
and he's he's worked at other sense. And
they're all telling you the same. Now as
this is playing, I'll include the the the
thread where I have many doctors that are
saying the same conversations.
But what he goes on to say here
is reading from international law, you can clearly
see
that
no matter what the narrative they're putting forward
or explicitly what they're saying, it still makes
what they're doing illegal. And now this is
happening in Lebanon.
Strike on,
in Bashura, in Beirut, Ebanet, which is a,
you know, very residential area,
reportedly has bottlenecked
the Islamic Health Organization,
in which local reports say 9 people were
killed. I mean, do you have your any
assessment on that or any I I don't.
Obviously, we wanna see hospitals and health care
facilities protected.
I don't know any of the underlying circumstances
related to that strike, so I certainly can't
speak to it. Because it feels like the
phenomenon we saw in Gaza of health care
facilities being targeted may now be happening in
Lebanon. I love it's funny how he says
targeted,
and Matt doesn't even push back on that.
Like, they're supposed we're supposed to be being
told that they're human shields and they're not
and they're using them as military dissenters.
No. As we all know, and even the
corporate media is telling you they were targeting
hospitals. It's just funny how that's just, like,
casually the reality. The point is, even Matt
they know we know that, guys. That's the
point. Now that it's kind of shifted away,
they're just focusing on the the new propaganda
focus. We wanna make sure you're misunderstanding what's
happening in Lebanon. We don't care if you
guys were past that. I mean, I think
these people all recognize that they're in a
really dangerous spot. They're complicit. The world sees
it. They could end up in a jail
cell tomorrow. So I think this is just
about maximizing the illusion, the propaganda,
but they are targeting hospitals. That's obvious. With
the audit evidence we have, I can't believe
anybody even has the gall to pretend otherwise.
But all you're getting is a bunch of
rabid Zionists lying to you about things online
and people that are following it for their
own interests.
Am I I mean, do look around.
It seems like everybody everywhere is recognizing what's
actually happening outside of people in political interest
and Zionists supporting it or people that are
just not caring enough to look.
And so, you know, the bar under international
humanitarian law is extremely high.
So I wondered, you know, if how closely
you're looking at this and what conversations you're
having with the Israelis. So I just can't
speak to the circumstances of this, right, because
I don't know. I but I will say,
when it comes to Gaza,
there are circumstances
where not the Israeli government, but the United
States
assessed
and had definitive evidence that Hamas was operating
outside of hospitals. And No. So you were
there, Matt?
On the ground? No. You I've I I
know exactly what they're referring to. They were
repeating what Israeli intelligence said, which is what
they do every time. We worked with our
counterparts, and they assured us their investigation. That's
what every time.
And interestingly enough, they're the party that we're
investigating. So you're asking the person possibly guilty
to investigate what they did and let you
know if they were guilty. That's how dumb
this is. They had built bunkers underneath hospitals.
So, How do all she even work out?
Did that work out? Or did they end
up showing you a waiting room with a
gun on table? And even the corporate media
laughed at them. But Matt Miller
following suit. We do wanna see health care
sites protected, but at the same time, you
know, at least in Gaza, we saw Hamas
actually operating outside of a hospital. So I
have to speak to this strike because I
don't have Not true.
I I they're operating see, you could claim
that there are tunnels that they're working, but
the claim that you can prove they were
operate, period. False. Lie. There's not been evidence
in any of these context to prove that
claim. Even the UN, other people made this
point, and And that's why they came out
and said, look. It's on you to prove
that they're using these before you bomb them.
That was in the 1st couple of weeks.
Never done that.
And still to this day, the only evidence
we have is that they are simply murdering
civilian people. And executing doctors as everybody seems
to be telling you, including the doctors that
are there, including
human rights groups, including aid workers, including everybody
but Israel and their blind supporters.
I don't have any definitive information about it,
but but just just an important point about
the the But I think it's important it's
important to ask the accountability question. I mean,
article 9 of the 4th Geneva Convention, when
you talk about protection ceasing if it's used
for hostile intent, but that is only after
g warning has been given, naming, and if
all appropriate cases, a reasonable time limit and
after such warning has remained unheeded,
the fact that sick or wounded members of
the armed forces are nursed in these hospitals,
shall not be considered to be acts harmful
to the enemy. So even if it is
a Hezbollah linked organization, the medics are there
treating, you know, potential militants, whatever, that's still
not high enough bar to attack it. And
just so he's clear, he's talking about, well,
as we know and we can prove,
aid workers, UN members, doctors like Nick Maynard,
they are there. Israel just says that there
were there are some laws there too, so
somehow that makes it okay to murder all
these people, or the people in beds, or
the babies in incubators, all of which we've
seen. So what he's saying is that does
not like, explicitly, that's actually important to make
sure we understand, That according to international
law, even if they are Hamas or Hezbollah
members who are being treated, that does not
allow you to bomb the building. We went
through all of this in the first so
many weeks. Like, people like Francesca Albanese from
UN UN Rapporteur, they were telling you, there's
nobody in international law agrees to anything they're
doing. It's collective punishment, it's a crime. And
they just say we disagree. So you have
the experts and then you have the politicians.
And you should consider for yourself based on
your due diligence, but point is you should
not be taking either one at face value.
But it's interesting how
politicians who have a clear interest in a
political outcome for themselves are the ones telling
you that the evidence isn't showing you exactly
what it is actually showing.
That's where we are. The evidence is obvious,
but the politicians go, not true. And people
who wanna be political,
left right team sport politics or blindly Zionist
support. You get where this goes.
This is how frustrating it's become with all
these stories. Even the conversation we're gonna get
to next, like, the evidence is there, and
then seemingly everyone loves to focus on the
narratives, the theories, which are there's a purpose
to it,
but not at the expense, not in lieu
of the verifiable facts that start the conversation.
Once it is attacked, there has to be,
you know, a huge amount of warning given
and enough time for people to leave. So
I asked the question because are you getting
a sense from the Israelis that they're doing
that? And we've seen this one here overnight.
I'm fully aware of the provisions of, international
humanitarian
Yeah. We know you are. That's why we
know you're violating them. I just don't have
the underlying facts about this, about this strike
and why they made this strike and what
they believe they were hitting and what they
actually hit. Okay. And then what's important to
recognize there is okay. So that would imply
that he cares and we're gonna find out,
but he won't. If nobody follows up, they'll
never look further. They'll never ask another question.
They'll never follow-up and say, here's what they
invest they don't care.
They're not in the interest of finding out
what happened in that hospital, but they'll be
driven to tell you what Israel said about
it and act like that's definitive if you
push them. The reality though is it's like
every other situation. The evidence on the ground
is clear. They're bombing hospitals. There's no military
target. Every I mean, look. We just saw
this with even corporate media around the Iran
versus Lebanon bombings.
Iran aimed at military targets, Israel did not.
That's objectively the case.
Now I'm gonna include this thread of all
these doctors all telling you the same thing.
All of them saying they're shooting children, they're
targeting civilians.
It's incredible.
Now here's a here's a by the way,
I've shown you I mean, Haaretz recently wrote
an article talking about how Israel used human
shields. I've given you countless
UN articles and human rights groups going back
decades saying Israel uses human shields when you
have very, very little, if at all, evidence
showing you the opposite.
Doesn't mean it's not happening, but doesn't it
matter that there's such flimsy evidence and all
you get is narratives from Israel who keeps
getting caught lying? Here's Haaretz in an older
article from 2021.
It says Hamas with question mark. It's Israel's
leaders who are hiding behind civilians again.
I mean, my god. It's incredible what people
can ignore.
Now Sarah Wilkerson, for going into today,
is pointing out, like a lot of people
have been highlighting, this is as of she
says less than 10 minutes after the evacuation
order. So we just heard the talk about
this.
Has to even if you think it's packed
full of Hamas members, if it's a hospital,
they have to give ample time for people
to get out of the way. The problem
is even if you let's just say there
are Hamas members or Hezbollah. Israel doesn't wanna
give anybody time because then they can leave
too. They'd even said that before. So that
means they want they'll kill civilians just so
they can also kill these people. But my
point would be, I don't even think they
care. They're not distinct there's no distinction. They're
killing people in Lebanon.
Just like they're killing people in Palestine.
Because,
I mean, you feel in the there are
plenty of obvious reasons whether it's
pettiness or just the fact they wanna just
murder all these people, they wanna take the
Lebanese territory. The point is that 10 minutes
after they gave an evacuation order, they immediately
started bombing the Burj Al, Barajne
area, some south suburb of Beirut.
Every time. We've seen this proven by UN,
by human rights groups, by people that were
present
in Gaza.
Aid workers, not not UNRA, but, aid workers
for for example, were wolf world food program
or WCK telling you that we see these
things happening.
Giving or or in Gaza, countless examples of
giving leaflets that had contradicting information that were
telling them to go to an area that
they then bombed or going telling them to
go to a place that they knew wasn't
safe. All of this is happening. And the
real point to make is they bomb everywhere.
We already know this. They bomb where they
are, they bomb where they're told to go,
and they bomb along the way. This has
been going on since day 1 of this
post October 7 discussion, and frankly, for 75
years plus.
But here we are again where they're just
going, get out of the way, and then
bombing them up they as they're picking up
their belongings because they don't care. They wanna
give the illusion of process,
but make sure they hurt them as much
as possible because that's who these people are.
The savior points this out. Here's just the
video.
Iraq and Beirut's air,
Bay Area a short while ago was bigger
than the strike that assassinated Das Ralla, says
a site,
Reuters source.
You can see this is what they're doing
in Beirut right now.
This one's just more sound, I think. Yeah.
You see in the background.
There it is.
So they're bombing all over Beirut just like
they were every other day before. This one
again is more recent. This is only from
a this is, couple hours ago. Air strikes
on Beirut are insane, it says.
You realize, guys, this is a densely,
densely civilian, little populated area.
See, just so you understand,
Iran, for example, even according to corporate media,
is aiming explicitly at military targets, and they
just lie about it.
Here, we've got Israel
bombing a suburb in Beirut and just going,
but Hezbollah has stuff there, or narrative, or
they're using human shields, with no evidence to
back it up. So on one side, everybody
can see the military targets and they go,
but no. You're missing the reality. They're lying.
So narrative.
Facts and then narrative.
And every side, the narrative is coming from
the Israeli government saying, no. This is no.
You're lying. Don't trust your eyes. Ignore everybody.
They're all racist.
How how do you not see this as
just shocking desperation?
And then just murdering, murdering, murdering, murdering, constantly
bombing people in Gaza, Lebanon,
and Syria, by the way. And we'll come
to that in a second. Now Robert just
put this article up today. Why Iran's retaliatory
strike attack on Israel was justified?
Now, I'm sure people will find that contentious.
It's not. What's crazy to me is that
it's contentious to point out the law.
I don't care what you think about Iran,
probably some if you think if if you
believe anything Israel is saying about them or
the US government, you're probably believing a lot
of lies. But understand,
like, every government that exists,
I don't support them. I don't believe in
government. I don't think these people are on
your side. I just don't. That's not to
say good guy, bad guy, but the reality
is clearly as we can see
that as Robert writes in this article, as
everybody with an objective stance is telling you,
Iran is acting as the adult in the
room here. They are actively trying to deescalate.
That's why they accepted a cease fire deal
and did not respond until they found out
that they were being tricked. And that's before
the last time we just discussed. That's in
response to the assassination of the, the Hamas
leader, right, in in Iran.
They vowed to respond, then they were told,
okay, we're gonna we have we have a
real ceasefire coming. This has already been reported
by corporate media as well. And that's why
they chose to wait.
And then they assassinated people, they murdered innocent
people, and Iran said, okay. Well, clearly they
were lying. And then they responded. Right? And
then they got tricked again and said, no.
Okay. That's why Nasrallah wants the building under
the guy. Now, you could call you could
say tricked or you can say that they
just recognize how dangerous this is and don't
want this to escalate like Israel clearly wants
it to. And so they hoped. Maybe they
will and then they killed him.
Same time, over and over. So what he's
talking about is the reality that from a
legal perspective, it was a completely justified response.
From every
possible perspective, what they're doing is measured and
it is resp and is a meticulous,
measured response that is arguably
meant to deescalate.
And the context of that is to show
you that's that we told you.
We're gonna bomb you in a couple of
hours. Is that what somebody does when they
wanna maximize suffering?
No. It's clearly because they want them to
see it's coming. They want them to be
able to stop it. They want to minimize
any possible fallout so they can then say,
okay.
Now can we start de escalating? We responded.
We we we
retaliated.
You get to make it look like you
succeeded somehow by acting like it's weak and
you could barely hit us even though it's
not what happened. Let me ask you think
about that for a second. Even when they
warned them and said we're gonna bomb you,
they still were able to get through all
of their defenses. And they still were able
to semi destroy one of these bases. Think
about that for a second. That's probably why
Netanyahu's hands were shaking when he was reading
that letter because that's pretty that you're gonna
fail. That's why they're desperate to get the
US to blindly step into this. But make
sure you read this because it's not contentious.
It is an objective perspective on the reality
that Iran, whether or not you think is
capable of the worst things in the world,
right now, is demonstrating the opposite.
And everything they're doing in regard to this
is being proven to be what you would
expect or rather, let's put it this way,
what the US and Israel pretend they're doing.
And that's not a pro Iran or Iran
supporting concept. It's just an objective statement of
the current facts.
Now president Biden put this out saying this
morning, this was yesterday, I called I joined
a call with g 7 leaders to discuss
Iran's unacceptable attack. I'm just showing you how
ridiculous people are. And by the way, Trump
is exactly in the same mindset.
Unacceptable is only when somebody responds to Israeli
aggression. That's that's what that word means to
them, apparently.
Against Israel and to coordinate his response to
an attack including new sanctions. Right? So you
sanction the Iranian government for responding to an
Israeli assassination that was illegal,
or the bombings that were illegal, or the
occupations that were illegal, or it's an its
entire existence that is illegal. Who cares about
those legal realities? Let's just make up a
story about Iran that we can't prove and
claim they're doing things that we can't see
or they're you see, this is how everything.
How how long until we start recognizing narrative
verse fact? He says, I reaffirm the United
States' ironclad commitment to Israeli security. Why do
we have a commitment to a foreign government
security?
I don't know. Maybe we should reflect on
that.
Marco Rubio, of course, says Israel should respond
to Iran the way that US would respond
to some country that launched a 180 missiles.
Even though, you know, bottom line is he's
saying that the US government and Israel should
respond and attack Iran.
These guys are belligerently dangerous.
Even though it was a target, a strike
towards military targets that was in response to
an attack, and, I mean, there's nothing about
this that even is even escalatory. But the
bottom line is he wants them to attack
because he is either being driven by Israel
to do this or he actually wants this
to boil into something that hurts Americans.
He says as they should do in Lebanon,
what and they should do in Lebanon what
we would be demanding our leaders do. No.
Most Americans would not. You maniacs would. If
terrorists were launching anti tank rockets at us
from a neighboring country,
forcing 60,000
Americans to evacuate. Yeah. He's talking about illegal
settlers who have been raping and burning people
alive, who have been forced out of illegal
territory and are living in hotels. Not the
people in Gaza, for example, who are all
barely surviving and starving to death, riddled with
disease, who are currently being bombed, has been
displaced 14 times since October 7th, who doesn't
care about them. Or how about the Lebanese
people who who have been occupied by Israel
for a long time, who are currently being
driven out of their homes? A 1000000 people
who have been and he's talking about 60,000
people.
And that's not even the that's actually not
the right number anyway. Think about how crazy
that is. I mean, it's just so obvious
that those people don't matter. Only Israelis matter.
Even
over Americans.
As Kim Iverson writes, are you an American
or Israeli?
These should not be contentious points, guys. We
need to start being real about what this
shows us. Now Syrian Girl puts this interesting
clip out. I I don't have the exact
date on this, but clearly this is from
a while back. Not suing you can tell
just by the by the,
resolutions. It's not that far back, but it's
not recent. But it's it this is it's,
Israel wants Americans to fight Iran for them.
Now if if there's ever a point that
shouldn't be contentious, this is right on the
surface of the conversation. But this is corporate
media talking about
it. And what he really would like to
happen is Israel Israel sits back
and the Americans
do it for the Israelis.
It's it's it would then be internationalized.
He knows that Israel will be attacked, whoever
does it, but they'll be attacked less.
And what he's most worried about is the
retaliation.
Talking about Netanyahu in Israel,
that's pretty wild. Right? But we know this.
And what's funny about it is they know
it too. They're just doing their job which
is to obfuscate the facts. That's what corporate
media does. For whatever reason, they wanted you
to think of that right then. Today, they
don't want you thinking that. But it's the
truth.
They're using you, Americans. How about, you know,
you America First Republicans out there, maybe you
should concern yourself with the fact that Americans
will be coming back in flag covered coffins
for an interest of a foreign government.
Nobody should want that in any context, let
alone for a government that doesn't care about
you, that is actively
parading is is talking about it to its
own people, about how easy it is to
manipulate Americans into doing things for them. I'm
not talking about a Jewish thing or a
Israeli
government
discussion. Netanyahu on multiple videos has been caught
bragging about how easy it is to play
the paradigm against itself, to use the 2
party illusion, to way to get them to
do whatever they need.
And in a in a smug sort of
laughable way, like you guys are being you're
so easy to play.
As we just saw in America killed in
Lebanon. I wonder if Trump said anything about
that. Did Biden say anything about that?
No.
Now here's probably one of the reasons why.
Sam Usseini points this out. The more I
think about, the more this seems to be
a full endorsement of an expansion of the
settler imperial project.
This is Walls,
and a quick clip saying the expansion of
Israel and its proxies
is an absolute fundamental necessity
for the United
States to have steady leadership there.
You realize what he just said? This guy
is a huge gaffe in my opinion. Or
maybe there's a reason they want you hearing
this.
The expansion of Israel?
Well, isn't that exactly what they're all desperately
telling you isn't true? The Greater Israel Project?
The only way Israel can expand would be
taking somebody else's territory. Well, duh. That's what
we're all showing you. Whether it's Syria
or Palestine
or Lebanon
or Jordan or Egypt or Saudi Arabia or
many others. They're all publicly telling you that
that's what they want to do. And yet,
he's either too stupid to know we just
let that out of the bag, or they
want you to thinking about this now. But
what he's talking about, first, is expansion of
Israel. That's alarming in and of itself. But
that the that the expansion of Israel and
its proxies?
Okay. What are we talking about exactly? Now
Sam, which he fair this could be what
he means, is thinking settler projects. But I
don't see that as proxies. I see that
is Israel. That's even they identify that as
who they are.
So who exactly are we talking about as
proxies?
Maybe the Egypt leadership?
UAE leadership? Because the countries do not support
Israel, clearly.
But I think that's probably what he actually
means.
The proxies,
which is funny enough exactly how they frame
Iran, Hezbollah, and Hamas of Iran even though
that's not even remotely the case. I do
think it's
every accusation is a confession. I mean, it's
pretty much what seems to happen today.
But he says proxies could mean right wing
Christians in Lebanon, al Nusra type nutjobs in
Syria.
He's right. It could mean those things, but
I think it's a combination of all of
it.
But I think the real point is that
we can't deny. Because, you know, we could
debate about what the proxies may mean, and
that's alarming in and of itself, but the
expansion
of Israel.
Wow.
Israel and its proxies is an absolute fundamental,
necessity for the United States to have the
steady leadership there.
Right. So in other words, we need to
regime change countries that we don't like the
leadership of because that's what we want. You
know? Democracy. Right, guys? Yay. Freedom and liberty.
Let's take over these countries and steal from
them because, lads. I just it's childish
that we pretend like we can't see what
they're doing. And I think a lot of
them do. They just don't want to admit
it because America. Right? We can just take
what we want because strength through you know,
it's like it's the same kind of thing
we see building yet again through the Republican
channels.
Peace through strength
or maybe escalation through de escalation.
Funny how it's the same conversation.
All that we're seeing here is the
mainstream endorsement from the vice president for the
potential cabinet of Kamala Harris
that we need to lean into Israel expanding,
which is a huge deal, which is what
we're seeing whether it's the West Bank or
other countries,
and let their proxies essentially be taking leadership
positions in other countries.
Or as he's saying, the the moderate rebels
in Syria or Al Qaeda and ISIS, which
are their proxies.
Either way, it's no different than the right.
It's the same thing. Walls, I just think,
is just too clumsy.
But they're all leaning into the same dynamic.
Now Hadi also we we already made this
point, but he just has a great, tweet
here showing you the actual image.
But the settler program in Israel is openly,
proudly telling you that they're gonna take Lebanon.
Just like they were telling you they're gonna
take Gaza, which they are.
And even though realized well before the
current October 7th forward point, they've already occupied
Gaza. Just so we're clear about that. The
anybody who is pretending that doesn't the case
is either really, really uninformed or deliberately lying
to you.
Going back to this and by the way,
even the larger conversation, I dispute with other
people that are mostly on my side. It's
been occupied since 1948.
Just realize that whether or not they physically
did this or took this piece of land,
since that point forward, Israel has claimed ownership
over Palestine.
And going back to the original UN documents,
that was the point. It's they occupy. They
took it all. And, of course, then it
come you can go forward, you know, 67
forward, for example, on the West Bank and
Gaza.
The point is that's just a constant variation
of the occupation. But either way, the point
is they want you to believe, they want
you to know they're gonna take Lebanon. Israeli
settlers are rallying to promote building settlements in
southern Lebanon.
Here, they even have the graphics for it
now.
This is real, guys. As they want you
to believe that it's all just liberating Lebanon
as we steal everything like they do every
time. Now Adam has a point just about
Iran I think is important to include.
He says nearly 70% of Iran science and
engineering graduates
are women.
Most Americans think women can't even go to
school there. Totally brainwashed.
It's really sad how shockingly uninformed a lot
of the partisanship are.
And both sides, mind you. Left and right.
Because realize that it's just your government.
And the game
all of your government, both left and right,
lie about Iran.
Lie about foreign policy. Blindly support Israel. There's
a reason why.
But that's interesting, isn't it? All the screaming
about women's rights and all. It's just it's
compare that to other countries. Or the reality
and look, I'm there's there is plenty that
I could point out about the problems there.
We've gone over it many times in the
past. A hijab conversation, the reality of what
it means, and that there are some people
that disagree, there are some that believe it
religiously, but there's a large faction of people
in Iran that still do this, women, because
they see it as a protest against US
influence.
Not because of there's a whole dynamic there.
But, of course, they just misrepresent it as
if we're trying to liberate them when all
you wanna do is steal them and put
them in a worse position. Steal from them.
But Jeanne points out they're the same lot
that think Lebanese women don't wear bikinis. And
we just made this point. Rana Rania pointed
this out. And she was like, I was
just there last week and they were wearing
skimpier things than than Miami. And you've got
this majorly influenced supposedly a Lebanon expert who
is telling you that they're suppressive and they
can't even wear bikinis anymore.
I I mean, either he's knowingly lying as
a dishonest person or he's, as an expert,
that's stupidly informed or uninformed. And what he's
an expert in is
propaganda around Lebanon or propaganda around Iran, which
is what Roberts made the point about many
many times.
But these are the people they try out
on corporate media, both left and right. Now
y'all's response to this, Nesta says, sure they
can and this is actually pretty funny. So
70% of women
are Iran Science and Engineering graduate to women.
And this guy says, sure. They can be
engineers, scientists, and many other well respected positions
in society. But do they have freedom to
be to open and OnlyFans like truly empowered
women?
Now, obviously, I think it's clear that he's
joking. But what's funny, as Adam says, I
wish this was satire,
the point is that in the world we're
in right now,
it's kinda scary that that may actually be
real. Like, I in any
I'm pretty sure he's joking. That's the sense
I get. But that's the point, is that
maybe he's not. This is something that people
would actually say today, which is crazy. But
some people would see it that way.
Sad.
Now let's talk about Gaza.
Some other points on this that I wanna
make sure you see before we finish with
the conversation of North Carolina.
Now as Dan Cohen points out or I'll
just start with doctor Fidel Naim. Elon Musk
just censored this. Twitter removed this post, not
this one, but the one these were originally
shared on, but we will not be silenced.
Enough with the killing.
Don't add to our suffering by silencing our
voices.
A terrible night in Gaza, this is being
posted on the second, after an airstrike hits
schools. Now you see this is the point.
While we're being we're many people are now
focusing on Lebanon, they're still indiscriminately
murdering children in schools
in Gaza.
An airstrike hit the Alomal Center For Orphans,
guys. The Alomal Center For Orphans.
There were thousands of displaced people from Gaza
city and Northern Gaza who took shelter there.
Dozens of injured women, children, and elderly arrived
at this location and of the El Sheba
Hospitals.
Here is just a few of the images
of the dead children that were there as
a result of what they did.
Not much peep not much coverage of this
because people are focusing on the larger discussion.
But Twitter
removed this post.
Can you think of any reason why that
might be the case? And as Dan Cohen
points out, while Elon Musk and his legions
of sycophants portray him as the savior of
free speech, he straight up censors evidence of
Israel's genocide in Gaza.
I don't need to convince any of you
they're actually paying attention. It happens every day.
Now,
miss Palestineia points out that these are children
who were living in the tents
before Israeli air strikes burned them to the
ground in Rafa.
They don't know which children are still alive
from this video, but logically, most of them
are probably dead based on what's going on.
Missing, for sure.
Most of them dead.
Here's what we're seeing.
It's a real photograph.
This photo needs to be the front page
of every newspaper in the world.
Mohammed Safa points out.
20
tents full of displaced families burned alive in
Gaza.
I just really want this to to sink
in.
This is what they're attacking. Are we gonna
believe that there's rockets under those tents? Are
there tunnel construsted? I mean, what are we
what was the story here,
Israel? Oh, that's right. There wasn't one. Because
nobody's asking questions anymore. They're just bombing entire
tent cities, you know, where they drove them
to. You realize the reason those are tent
areas is because that's where they told them
to go to be safe.
Safe. And then they bomb them and burn
them in the they burn them in their
tents in the middle of the night, mind
you.
Because that's what it is.
Is that what a democracy does? The only
democracy in the Middle East? Most moral army
in the world?
It's like just It it hurts me to
even say that.
Put a bad taste in my mouth.
Are these people undeserving of life?
These children?
Also, Rod points out,
this is what genocide looks like.
In 1 year,
902
families.
Almost a 1000 families have been wiped off
the civil registry.
According to Gaza's government media office, which added
that at 1,364
cases,
one family member survived.
902
entire families. Now I'm a I'm a I'll
show you Robert's tweet in a minute about
the over
100 members of his his extended family who
have been killed in Gaza.
Now for all those that will immediately jump
to the expected response of, we can't trust
the Gaza. Well, your government already told us
we could.
Here's VICE News Israeli intelligence, so your intelligence
apparatus, has deemed the Hamas run health ministry's
death toll figures generally accurate.
So when the Elon Levies of the world
screech about how you shouldn't trust them, well,
then you're telling me that your own government's
lying to you? Or us?
Probably. Probably actually the case. But the point
is that you can't pretend that's it that
we shouldn't be trusting it because that's what
we all know when your own government, both
the intelligence
and the army,
made the case that it you that these
were
this case was accurate.
The army itself
has found that they are reliable.
Many, many, many times over the years, it's
been shown. And even though they know that,
even though the media knows that, you still
get these same arguments from the people like
Levy and and
David Collier and these absolute morons out there
that will just lie to you because Zionism.
That's why this is important because they're gonna
try to pretend this isn't the case.
Gaza Health Center, that'll work.
Pro
probable evidence
that the human toll in Gaza
is already greater than a 118,908
civilians.
This letter was signed by 99
US medical professionals.
99,
not Palestinian doctors, not unremembers,
US medical
professionals.
Directly signed and and and addressed to Joe
Biden.
We are 99 American physicians, surgeons, nurses, midwives,
who have volunteered in Gaza,
and they're straight up telling you that this
point based on the estimations, and I guarantee
this overlaps with the Lancet investigation and so
on, it is likely that the death toll
is greater than a 118,000
people. That's almost 5.5%
of Gaza's population.
But it'll be ignored by the same people
pretending they care about human life. Now realize
this is not even just Gaza. And it's
not even just the like, realize the West
Bank also spun out after this, which was
part of what Lebanon is Robert made this
case. They he predicted this exact thing would
happen because they failed in Gaza. It was
embarrassing for them. And so they stepped into
West Bank and just murdered a bunch of
people. Taken and and guess what? They framed
that as a win to their people. Look
at what we did. They can't stop us
in the West Bank. Think about how weak
that makes them.
But not only did they just invade the
West Bank and march through like charm troopers
and burn houses down and rape and pillage,
They are carrying out air strikes.
Air strikes. You realize how crazy that is
when you're talking about technically being part of
Israel proper? That's Israel
carrying out air strikes on Israel. Now I
mean that in the sense of how they
view it. All of this is Palestine.
But this is not Gaza. This is the
West Bank. There's not a Hamas presence there.
That's provable by every account. That's not to
say that there might not be associated overlaps,
but the people are there is not a
Hamas entrance presence in West Bank. And they
are carrying out air strikes in the Tulkarim
area of Northern occupied West Bank.
Fourteen Palestinians
killed.
I think that's crazy. Think about that. That's
like air strikes carried out in the town
next to yours by your government. Because they
claim that there
are terrorists holed up in somebody's home.
I mean, I just this is exactly what
we're talking about.
Now this
documentary came out in regard to specifically the
I mean, a lot of different points, but
this one has to do with the idea
of blocking aid.
And I think it's important to hear this
because these are people from the US government
that resigned in protest who know what's happening.
As this as Rania writes, I hope it
haunts everyone backing this horrifying genocide.
And what you write in your resignation email?
I said that report will haunt us.
And it does, and it haunts me.
The determination
that Israel is not blocking humanitarian assistance
is
patently,
demonstrably false.
Famine happens when assistance is blocked.
It is the outcome of a deliberate decision.
In April, Stacy Gilbert was asked for her
input on a Biden administration report on whether
Israel was committing war crimes in Gaza.
I was shocked to see that it said,
in very clear terms,
it is our determination that Israel is not
blocking humanitarian assistance.
You had advised that that wasn't the case.
Is that correct? Yes.
The subject matter experts were removed,
and the report was moved up to a
higher level.
We just talked about this. Remember Matt Miller
tried to act like you're just playing the
game where the one you like is the
expert? No. That's what I said before. There
were the subject experts and then there were
politicians who have an interest in a political
game against Iran.
And so what they asked the experts, right,
and they said, they're blocking it.
No. It wasn't they gave it to 2
different groups and both chimed in. They gave
it to the experts. They said they're blocking
it, then they go, well, oh, let's get
a second opinion. Let's let's let's go to
the people we know are gonna give us
a con it's the same with the fluoride
game. We just talked about this. Right? They
are playing you. They know. They ask the
experts, The report comes out. Yeah. Florida's killing
people. And they go, woah. Let's ask everybody
else. Hold on. CDC, EPA, let's get everybody
involved. And all the industry entities step in
and go time out. Even though that happened,
we still now know that we forced it
through. The NTP and FAN made sure we
saw that. But they have been stri desperately
trying to maintain it. It's the same thing
here. They knew
that they couldn't let that be the case
because they don't care about American interests. They
don't care about innocent life. They don't care
about human rights. They care about supporting Israel
blindly.
So they went to anybody who would give
them the answer they want, and then they
forced this person who's actually being honest out
of her position. That's what happens over time.
Government drives out the people that care and
fills it with people that will blindly follow.
And then over the process of decades, we
look back and go, we can't be everybody
pro yeah. It can. It really
can. We were told you will see the
report when it is released publicly.
And then the report comes out
and just doesn't include what you had to
say. I wasn't sure I read that correctly.
I read it again, and I sent an
email
then that I would resign as a result
of that.
Yep. I mean, think about how many times
now. It was very short period of time.
Like, just going back to COVID 19 illusion,
FDA members,
people or how about this guy?
This one I think is powerful every time
I in whatever context. We have to condemn
the atrocities that happen every day to Palestinians
in the West Bank. You mentioned sexual violence.
I was part of the human rights vetting
process for arms going to Israel,
and a charity called Defense of Children International
Palestine,
drew our attention at the state department to
the sexual assault, actually the rape of a
13 year old boy that occurred in an
Israeli prison in Moscabia in Jerusalem.
We examined these allegations.
We believe they were credible.
We put them to Israel to, the government
of Israel. And you know what happened the
next day?
The IDF went into the DCIP offices and
removed all their computers and declared them a
terrorist entity.
I think it is vital that atrocities not
happen to anyone. Not sexual atrocities, not sexual
violations, not any kind of gross violation of
human rights. We are looking at a situation
where there is so much dehumidification
where people are not seen
Right. He resigned from the state department.
And this is before October 7th. Let's not
pretend like it was all because of October
7th that they ended up raping those people
in prison. No. That's what Israeli government direction
has caused.
Period.
And he tried to call it out, and
they knew it, and instead, they tried to
cover it up. And guess what they used
to cover it up? You're a terrorist.
Yeah. Because that's usually what happens. Or racist.
One of their 2 go to's.
Kuds News Network highlights that food supplies in
Gaza have sharply declined as Israeli authorities implemented
new custom rules for humanitarian aid and scaled
back commercial deliveries. You see, people have were
looking elsewhere. Not as they're pretending, it's not
the as Elon would tell you, levy
more food than they ever had, even though
we know it's not the case. Well, now
it's gotten even worse. So already, famine and
here, I'll include this by the way, seeing
as how this is important to have
in front of you, the IPC itself, the
expert in the field, telling you at the
at this moment, famine is imminent for 1,100,000
people in Gaza. Catastrophic food insecurity
right now.
And they lie about it. And many of
them are calling it a hoax, you you
know, Levy included. It's a hoax.
Imagine you calling something else a hoax like
that. What would they do? Right? The bottom
line is that
past that point, knowing this is where we
are, they've made it even worse. They're actually
taking action, making new rules
to drive this into further famine.
I mean, look. Based on their current actions,
we damn well know what they're trying to
do. They want every single Palestinian gone, and
here's what they're doing. They can act like
it's their fault somehow.
UN aid trucks have from Jordan have been
halted for 2 weeks, guys. 2 weeks. Raising
concerns about increasing malnutrition in Gaza. Commercial food
shipments also dropped with Gaza now receiving as
few as 45 trucks a day. Remember, it
starts with 500.
Before October 7th,
500 a day, which included other than food,
but 500 a day.
And they were still food insecure. That was
barely maintaining a food insecure position. 45 trucks
a day.
They realized
I mean, that's a guaranteed
decline into death.
Period.
And before you start jumping to the narrative
from Israel about how they shouldn't, the point
the only reason they even need assistance is
because they've never allowed them the right of
return. They forced them into refugee camps, removed
them from their homes, and have kept them
in these positions, and in Gaza, are not
allowed to leave anywhere.
And then make it their fault. Just straight
up racism, guys. The pea they're it's disgusting.
Humanitarian workers warn that food insecurity is at
its worst in recent weeks, impacting 2,300,000
Gazans. That that's the whole country, guys. That's
all of them.
Now I'll include the ProPublic article, which, you
know, it's amazing how much evidence we have,
and all we end up going with is
what the politician said.
Everything else shows you, but Blinken said. Right?
Israel deliberately blocks humanitarian aid. 2 government bodies
concluded. But Matt Miller went with the expert,
apparently. No. He went with the politician.
Here is Avi Shlom, who I've played many
times.
Now I don't know if this is a
new one or not. It's at the, the
kind of was it the Oxford kind of,
what is it called again? You know, we've
we've seen this setting of them once, where
they have these little debates. I think it's
Oxford. I could be wrong. But the point
is, he's simply standing up and giving his
side of the argument. But this is an
Israeli
academic, highly respected,
who speak spoken many times over the years
about what Zionism really is, maybe I'll play
that next. But here he is talking about
he how he served in the IDF and
what they actually do.
Which by the way, there is so many
videos like this coming from people that were
in this position. He served in the IDF
in the mid 19 sixties.
The ultimate aim of all these policies
to deny the Palestinians
any independent
existence
in Palestine.
Let me turn briefly to Hamas. Under international
law, the Palestinians
have the right to resist the occupation and
Hamas is the vanguard of this resistance.
Now now if you hear him flush out
his thoughts, he wouldn't tell you that I
blindly support Hamas or if they're even good.
But he's simply he's making a objective point.
Whether or not you support them or think
they're good people, it's still the law and
this still is the reality.
Now if they commit crimes, that was just
still crimes. See how easy that is? But
the problem is you get these emotional
screaming arguments about how, yeah, how dare you?
They're the worst terrorist group in the world.
No. Those are the people you're supporting. Those
are the governments that you think you're a
side on.
Period.
Doesn't matter what you think about the groups.
These are the groups that I mean, let's
see. Going back to the election conversation, I
still think Israel is completely involved with making
that illusion happen. Either way, let's pretend it
wasn't. They elected this group. You don't like
them. You think they're terrorists, but then you
go, no. We don't like that, so somebody
else. Well, then you don't believe in democracy.
And the bottom line is, what he's telling
you is that they are the vanguard of
that resistance.
And that means they have the legal right
to act against Israel,
including and especially talking about the illegal kaboot
settlements that are used as a human shield
between Israel's prop May areas and everybody else.
But the point,
legally, they have this right. The international law,
the Palestinians
have the right to resist the occupation and
Hamas is the vanguard of this resistance.
Israel is a reactionary and racist colonial power,
which relies on brute military force to impose
its apartheid regime on the Palestinians.
Israel is the main obstacle to peace, and
I reject this motion with some views.
Zionism
is racism.
Israel cannot be both. Israel is either
a racist Jewish state or it's a democratic
state for everybody, and that's what I would
like this here to be. I'd like
a democratic solution, one state with equal rights
for,
all its inhabitants.
Your organization Human Rights Watch issued
a report last year,
about
Israel Mhmm. And the conclusion was it is
an apartheid state.
And there are 4 major
human rights groups in the last 2 years
who issued similar reports
reached the same conclusion.
Israel
is an apartheid state. So
apartheid
is racism.
Apartheid
is discrimination.
But
Israel is the only member
of the United Nations that I know
which is officially racist.
And I say this
because of the,
July
2018
nation state law, which says
the Jews
have
a unique
unique right to serve the termination
in Israel.
Unique means exclusive. Yes. It means Arabs have
no right to serve the termination. Mhmm. It
means even if Arabs became a majority Mhmm.
They would still have no right to serve
the termination. Mhmm. So most certainly,
Zionism
is a,
is a racist ideology
and it is largely responsible
for the Anakba
that has unfolded throughout the last century and
continues today.
And, of course, as you can see, I
grabbed for you the I I don't know
what the 4th one is. I'm there's more
than 4, by the way, but I don't
know what the 4th major one he is
talking about. If you know, let me know.
But these are the 3 main
highly regarded human rights groups in the world.
Human Rights Watch, 2021,
apartheid state.
Undeniably. He was right there, he was speaking
with Human Rights Watch.
AMIS International. Israel's apartheid against Palestinians, 2022. Or
yeah. 2022. And then, of course, I think
the most important, Beth Solon. And and leading
Israeli human rights group, not a Palestinian, an
Israeli human rights
group. This is apartheid.
A regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan
River to the Mediterranean Sea. This is apartheid.
Which, as you just heard him discuss this
Israeli academic, it is the worst example of
of racism that we know of.
On top of that, the nation state law
he points to is important to remember as
well. This is from 2019.
Very real. The law exists,
and the point was that I always make
this case.
A
TV star
who either doesn't know and is blinded by
the narrative or is lying for Israel stood
up and says and say it said Arabs
are equal citizens. So in this narrative, you
keep hearing people saying that on Twitter, Ben
Shapiro, the rest of liars.
Well, guess what? The star the TV star
said that publicly, Netanyahu himself stood up and
corrected it. Not stood up, but, you know,
responded And says, Israel, this is a quote,
is the nation state of the Jews alone.
That was his response
to the to the claim that Arabs are
equal.
And yet, here we have, all the people
in the world telling us that you're such
a racist liar.
They're either really stupid and uninformed, or they're
a dishonest person. It's right in front of
you. A lot of this is like that.
Now, this is, what was this? From TRT
World? The US is responsible for 37 out
of 41 vetoes where the United Nations Security
Council has tried to hold Israel accountable for
their crimes.
This and and the guys and this goes
back a long way. But I I in
fact, I thought it was more than that.
But in any case, a lot of times,
they've tried to hold them accountable for ever
crimes that the world can see, and every
time they stand up and say, no, we
won't allow that. Not because they're upholding the
that, you know, the claim is always they're
racist or there's some kind of a bias.
Well, if the law is biased, well then,
I mean, you could argue in any cases
it could be applied. The application of a
law arguably would not be. You could I
mean, it's you could always make a case.
The point is in this case, the law
is what they're breaking. They're killing children,
using human shields, occupying territory,
and they just go, you're racist.
End of story.
Which by the way is what we get
today. Oh, you keep your starving children to
death. You must hate Jews.
That should sound stupid because it is. Here
is a documentary from Al Jazeera.
And this this is a a hour 20
minute long documentary which I highly recommend you
check out.
That shows you exactly what's going on. And
there's a few of these coming out right
now. There's one around health. There's one about
the starvation. There's I think there's actually 2
from Al Jazeera. Either way,
they're breaking down just untold amounts of war
crimes that publicly pointed out. They're praising them.
They're laughing about them. They're having little streams
about how they're killing children. It's the worst
thing you've ever had to watch. Now compare
this to a fake snuff film made up
of a bunch of provable lies that Israel
still circulates.
Very different than some bloody room that you
lie about and find out you later fabricated,
or
actual explicit videos taken by IDF members laughing
about how they just murdered children.
Bit different, isn't it?
Robert Lindlikes says this, as this was today.
I'm accused of pro Palestine bias as a
journalist.
To be clear,
when you see kids shot in front of
you, which he has.
When close friends are blown to pieces with
their children, which they have been.
When you lose 100 plus
extended family members and colleagues, which he has.
You can't be objective, in quotes,
but you can tell the truth.
I mean, just there's there's few people I
have more respect for than Robert and Lukes.
But imagine being in this position. You read
his work.
Imagine what it takes to remain unemotional objective,
which he is, in the in this position.
And he makes a good point. I mean,
this is the point. We all have our
biases. We all do.
And clearly, you can see why he has
a he has a reason to be to
hate.
To be outraged. And yet he still finds
time a way to keep himself objective and
and straightforward with one of your reports. And
clearly, in many cases, I mean, you you
it's read his work and you'll see what
I'm talking about.
Can you imagine that?
A 100 members. Now this is extended family.
Right? It's not just immediate but that's a
that's part of his family. His wife's family.
And the greater extended family. A 100 plus
people in Gaza. That's like these 902 families
that are being wiped off the map.
Not not Hamas members.
Just his family.
Personal.
Jonathan Cook makes a good point to end
this segment.
He says, you decide.
And hopefully, we've got some people out there
that have been paying attention to the show
today that maybe disagree with us.
If you're being objective, you tell me how
you you decide.
He says, I've been saying for 25 years,
I've lived in and studied Israel, that it
is a highly militarized,
ethno nationalist, apartheid state. You know, but that
basically every human rights group just told us
that, but, you know, he's saying that's his
belief. Driven by an ugly Jewish supremacism
that aggressively craves, as he this, word we
just looked the other day, the Levenshrahm, is
sort of like the
defining
nation it says the territory that the state
or nation believes is needed for its natural
development. It comes from the Nazi German mindset.
And it says, and cannot make peace with
its neighbors. Actually, make sure that was the,
yeah, specifically associated with Nazi Germany. And so
he's see he sees it as a militarized,
nah ethnonationalist
apartheid state driven by supremacism,
aggressively seeking other people's territory.
That cannot make peace with its neighbors. He
says Western politicians and pundits have been telling
you over the same period that Israel is
a normal, liberal, democratic state,
where the rule of law applies and anyone
who disagrees is almost certainly an antisemite.
Which account of Israel better records with what
you have seen
of Israel's behavior
over the past year?
Over the past month?
Yesterday?
You tell me, when you stand back and
are being real with yourself,
which one of those lines up with what
you're seeing?
You guys can decide. I think it's pretty
clear.
Now, Israel also just bombed and it what
seems to be a pretty large escalation, but
at least it's being framed that way and
it is.
But I argue it's not as much because
this has been going on a long time.
Anybody that's actually been paying attention? Israel's been
bombing Syria and in some cases, pretty much
Russian territory or I bases or at least
tangential or close enough to where it should
matter
for a long time now. Now this one's
a little bit more specific, but I just
think the point it's important to point out
that Russia could let this fly over and
not respond just like they have many times
already.
Because whether it's again, do never take this
as good guy bad guy because that's just
a childish binary view of things. But the
reality being is that it Russia has many
times since they've been bombing,
Syria, both the US and Israel, has shown
restraint
in times where the US and Israel would
have never.
Just important to think about. And it says
Israel apparently just destroyed an ammo depot owned
by in owned by Russia in Syria. When
is Russia going to wake up here? This
is Casey Wright saying this. He ought to
watch Nasrallah's final speech because the last line
is relevant.
But he said this is, Middle East observer.
Sham, the foreign minister,
firefighting teams headed to one of the sites
surrounding the Jubilee,
area after columns of smoke rays rising from
it. This is the,
basically, a Russian base
that they have bombed.
That's the general reporting we're getting. Now this
is this is as of this is late
yesterday into today.
Russian defenses have begun to support Syrian air
defenses, which again has been kind of going
on for a long time now.
So I think this is gonna get a
little bit more like, let's put it this
way. If Russia needed an excuse to drive
this harder knowing that they're already supporting, I
I can at least ostensibly,
the Palestinian plight or the Syrian plight plight
that then extends to to Palestine, however you
wanna look at it, This may be the
the move that will I mean, everything Israel's
doing is shooting itself in the foot, but
this could be
a more of
a blowback than they expect.
So here's what Wilkerson had to say about
this, and I find it interesting.
K. In almost every category, I don't wanna
even get into the domestic issues. But in
terms of international relations, foreign policy, security policy,
this is the most damaging,
cretin like group of people I have ever
encountered in my life in this country.
Tony Blinken leads the list. Joe Biden is
right there with him. Jake Sullivan is right
there. Lloyd Austin has resurrected himself a bit
because of what I've heard in the background
about him trying to bring the hammer down
on people, including Bibi himself. He was totally
ignored.
But that's the only sign of sanity and
sobriety in this administration. Administration. And we are
just doing along with Ukraine,
we are doing irreparable damage to ourselves. Last
night, I picked up a a communication that
Israel had launched a strike against Tardis, the
Russian base in Syria.
I've yet to confirm it with,
sources that I respect,
including our own here, but I wouldn't be
surprised.
They they're attacking the Russian base, and they
got fired at by s 300 and s
400 missiles.
I don't know if they brought some
vaunted Israeli
aircraft down, but they may have. I also
know
that we have been dislodged to a certain
extent from our little fiefdom in Syria.
We are in Syria illegally.
Bashar al Assad is the leader of Syria.
He has not asked us to be where
we are. We are not fighting ISIS. We
are protecting oil wells that were at least
pumping oil to Israel. I'm told with the
help of Russia, we've been pushed off that
particular installation of So here's important that the
as he's claiming, the oil they've been stealing
from Syria for a long time now is
being used in Israel. Surprise, surprise. So it's
just the extension of their
terrorist network. Right? Their their criminal organization network
where they're just occupying countries, stealing resources, and
pumping it into the new genocide.
Pretty obvious.
But let's realize as, you know, Russia is
clearly playing an interesting role in this. There's
obvious influence from Israel
in Russia like there is everywhere.
So consider that fact. But the off the
obvious point is that we've seen a lot
of different responses from Russia overlapping with Syria.
I don't think it's as simple as simply
saying it is even in the United States.
We realize that obvious influence there more than
anyone in the world, which is easy to
see. But nonetheless, there are still things that
seem to go against their interest in some
cases. It's never as simple as just going,
everybody's controlled by x y and z. Right?
But nonetheless,
it's all showing you the the criminality. Well,
I mean, on top of the overall, Russia
has been showing the support for Syria. Syria
wouldn't be there right now if they weren't.
So even that seems to aggressively contradict what
Israel's intentions were for Syria. At least as
we can see. And the point is what
they claimed. Not what I'm pretending they want,
but they themselves have expressed in other conversations.
And I'm talking about the leadership, the rulership.
It's like this. And so we might not
be protecting those oil well people. But we're
involved in the largest oil smuggling operation in
the world in Syria if we're still doing
that. Mhmm. So this is just a comedy
of errors that is nonetheless
not comedy at all. It's bloody. It's filled,
as Lloyd Austin said, with civilian casualties. Lebanon
has added to that toll immeasurably.
We now are building a civilian
a civilian casualty toll in Lebanon as well
as Gaza and on the West Bank,
and we're associated with it. Oh, we're not
just associated.
We are the enabler.
They are. We are not the government.
The government is doing this.
Most of those things that they're taking into
Lebanon,
the artillery rounds, the artillery the 155 artillery
pieces, the MLRS and such, all are things
that we either provided them the funds to
buy or we gave to them.
So we're as much invading Lebanon as is
Yeah. The government is. Your governments who are
acting in your interests.
Now as somebody mentioned in the chat, by
the way, and I had this pulled off,
but I haven't I wouldn't I didn't wasn't
able to flush it out entirely. I saw
it last before going into the show. The
the reports are saying that Ukrainian attacks have
hit towards a Russian power installation, nuclear power
discussion. But ultimately and I haven't seen it
fleshed out, so we'll be looking into that
going forward. But the point is, let's not
forget who is influencing and arming and funding
and driving action through the Azov Movement, the
US government in Israel. For I think right
now the desperation of Israel's needs is being
shown in every string that it has. Everything
it can pull, it is pulling. And you're
seeing it. That's why we just went over
the every single US politician left and right
coming out yesterday going, I pray for Israel.
Well, you can prove objectively they are committing
more crimes, more war crimes than anybody in
a short period of time we've ever seen.
More shelter death toll, more civilian bombings, more
targeted attacks, more human shields use, more illegal
u munitions. I mean, it's just incredible,
which has to show you how bad of
a position we're in as Americans.
Every single one of them came out and
said, yeah. We're blind support, unconditional.
During the most obvious and most documented genocide
we've ever seen.
We are in a bad position as Americans.
We have to see that. As the savior
points out, here's Ukraine. Can we bomb Russian
air bases?
The US, no. It can lead to escalation.
Israel, we bombed the Russian air base.
It's just The point is there's no consistency.
There's It's it's Israel does whatever it wants
and the US f toes the line.
Now,
we're gonna talk more about this as we
go forward.
Obviously. I mean, right now, they're bombing in
Lebanon. That is happening. And they're bombing in
Gaza. They're bombing Syria. They're bombing Yemen.
All of these countries are actively fighting to
free
countries from occupation.
Doesn't mean good guy, bad guy, but that
is the objective reality. Now just because you
see them as terrorists because the group trying
to occupy them tells you that,
maybe you should ask whether they might have
an ulterior motive.
This is a thought.
But whatever the overarching point that you think
is most important,
there is law in guard in in in
action here. And if you think that ultimately
they can just ignore that law because they've
told you the people over there are bad,
Again, I think this is a childish mentality
that allows you to ignore criminality
because you've chosen the side. And if that's
not the 2 party illusion in real time,
I don't know what else is. But make
sure you pay attention to what they're actually
doing, not what they're telling you they're doing.
What they're currently doing is bombing civilians by
every account other than the US and Israel
and people blind supporting what they're doing. I
mean that. Look around.
It's important to see this, and we need
to do whatever we can to stop this
from continuing to escalate. Now in other news,
from a local perspective, from an American perspective,
I thought it was important to discuss this
story because
it is a import what's the right word
for it? In the partisan conversation, it has
sort of overtaken the conversation.
That always is interesting to see. So I
wanted to start with
the last show we just did.
Major dioxin risk in Georgia, which I I
argue is a very big deal, which is
getting very little coverage overall, even though it
has now seemingly dissipated, it was days of
nonstop chlorine and other unknown chemicals, they won't
tell you, burning. That is a maximized dioxin
problem. Chlorine is the pinnacle reason that these
crude dioxins are formed.
So hopefully, we're not gonna you know, Georgia
and the surrounding areas need I think it
was it was, was it covers or, forget
the name of that one, the main location.
But jor generally, the areas in the surrounding
states based on East Palestine and how we
know this stuff drifts along the air, as
we are now being told that with states
across after East Palestine, which, by the way,
is what we're telling you right at the
beginning, they lied about.
We need to ask whether we we need
to make sure we get independent testing, find
out what actually happened, what the actual reports
are showing from dioxin release,
and
hold these people accountable.
And the the media, the local government,
for what ask them why they're not doing
their job, why they're not testing for it,
why they're not telling you what was there.
But we also talked about
the overlap.
And there's a there was a there was
a
Ohio example as well, coming back from East
Palestine, by the way. But I wanted to
just point this out so you make sure
you don't miss that important story and overlap
that with 2 points before we go on
more to the to the the part from,
North Carolina.
This is from
yesterday.
Haze,
chlorine smell from chemical plant fire could be
noticeable in Atlanta.
So just like I told you before,
when if people were feeling ill or feeling
smelling this or seeing drifting ash fall all
the way across state lines, those are that's
dioxin trend that that means that's how far
that went. And I wanna make sure people
understand this. Look at the last show we
just did. The fact that there was a
is a chlorine
the one of the largest things they were
producing was chlorine. And your and the amount
of smoke and the red colored smoke, that
means that they're burning particulates
and then a massive chlorine combustion. That is
guaranteed,
in my opinion, based on the science we
looked over, to cause a massively larger dioxin
release than what we saw with vinyl chloride
in East Palestine.
But I guarantee there are experts out there
that know more than me in this topic.
Where are they? This should be discussed. I'm
hoping somebody like Scott c Smith or somebody
actually goes and starts testing there because I
think it's a problem.
But my point is to show you this
and kind of over dovetail this with the
conversation in
hurricane Helene.
Because here's what I'm hearing in Tennessee.
Tennessee environmental department, this is as of this
morning or late yesterday,
warns people to temporarily avoid all bodies of
water affected by extreme flooding. Now, obviously, the
first point is that during this the flooding,
there's always, you know, sewage and different problems,
which I don't even know why. I mean,
in some cases, you can see why that,
you know, the drains and the ground and
so on. You think it'd be better protected
than that or seal but the point is
you can have that happen. When flooding happens
and you worry about sewage and, you know,
disease and whatever else.
But I found this interestingly overlapped. So at
the same time, when just a few states
over, you have
this happening,
all of a sudden, they're going, don't drink
any new bodies of water.
I don't know. I find that interesting. Now
it could just be that it's simultaneously happening,
but I wanted to make sure we saw
that. So but this brings us over into
the idea of the hurricane
and the larger conversation of what might be
going on.
So what we're gonna get into here to
finish up and it shouldn't really take all
that long, but I wanna go through this
and show you what I found and what
my perspectives are. And
explicitly stay out of the the gate from
this cup this part of this segment. It's
important that we question everything.
Do not dismiss the possibility of weather modification.
Do not dismiss the possibility that there may
be some kind of an
surreptitious agenda from the local government or some
other corporation. I mean, guys, this is literally
what
this is
I mean, the plot of every damn movie,
it's it's literally what we've seen happen over
and over and over through our history. And
you know what the the usual kind of
the the common thread
is that they lie about it until they're
caught and then give you a narrative and
try to lessen the damage every time. Or
in the interest of or the example of
Norfolk Southern,
lie about it, get caught, nothing happens,
Which is what happened.
But and my point saying all that is
that we should it's important that even though
things seem like they may be crazy, things
that we now know, like with during the
COVID 19 illusion or even geoengineering itself.
These are obviously real. They've admitted these things.
But one second ago, it was crazy, lunatic
conspiracy theory.
So just don't dismiss anything. But at the
same time, that applies to the other side
of the coin.
Question everything.
Including things that might be coming from people
you trust. Including from people that are trying
to tell you that there's more going on
but yet not giving you any facts to
back it up. Or, you know, this and
I'm not even I'm not even saying I
have an example in my mind. I'm just
saying every time we see these large conversations
that is overrun with people dumping in BS,
making up narratives to get you clicking, or
to get you
how about more how about more specifically, that
everything that we're highlighting is real, but then
you get people with other agendas trying to
muddy the waters with nonsense to make you
miss the real part of it? You know,
like for example, with Lahaina,
there was a very real overlap with the
directed energy directorate. But as far as my
research showed that we were never able to
definitively prove that because we honestly, we didn't
even really need to because the criminality was
so extreme just with what happened that we
could prove, but guess what? Nobody was held
accountable.
Because these bombastic
morons out there were driving you into conversations
that had no basis in reality. They were
making you miss the forest for the trees.
But here's an the thought would be that
maybe
maybe those maybe they were using direct anti
weapons, which are very real. And because of
all those bombastic morons, that got missed. Because
instead of highlighting the provable location and what
they might have actually done scientifically sound, you
end up with blue things and lasers and
dumb stories that I can prove to you
were false that would that make you miss
the real story.
So all that's to say, let's go through
this with an objective mind,
holding on to what we can prove,
and asking every question. So here is, XBN
saying breaking and this is highlighting a Fox
News report.
Nearly 200 people have been confirmed dead, this
is as of today.
Now my point is what Fox News is
doing here is is what I kinda find
gross. Just the kind of just constant coverage
of just people suffering,
which there is a news value to just
going look at what's happening in North Carolina.
And yet and the fact that it's ongoing,
yeah. The the daily report here is what
happened. But what we keep seeing from corporate
media is we know going back a long
way. Big storm events
get views,
so they hype it. They hype it like
it's some kind of an investigation when it's
just a storm. But see, the point is
that if we can prove government malfeasance level
1, then that absolutely matters. But they rarely
go into that. If we can't prove that
there's some kind of technological manipulation going on
with the weather, then my god, that's a
huge story. But we should prove or have
something to go on other than there is
an agenda to take the land, therefore, this
must have been what happened. Which is not
what I think. I'll go into all of
this for you.
But what they're doing from the corporate media
perspective is sort of like just they you
know,
like NFL coverage of the ongoing weather story,
and it's just it bothers me. But let
me play this first just so you can
hear what they're reporting. This is as of
yesterday into today.
Now we can tell
you that the number has just jumped.
The confirmed dead,
at least 200 people.
We are just beginning to see some new
and more heartbreaking images
of the storm's intensity.
Nearly 1,000,000 people
remain without utilities, no electricity,
no running water in certain areas
across 4 states.
Damn. That's crazy.
Now, it it may just not to say
that there may be some logical reason why
they can't or whatever you wanna fit in
right there, but it shouldn't really matter. Right?
The idea that people have been left in
this position while your government is dumping 1,000,000,000
of dollars in foreign countries, it it obviously
doesn't sit right for most people, left or
right. And I think that's a problem for
them right now, that we can all recognize
that this that you are not the primary
objective for your government, if ever, by the
way. Now let's not forget going back to
hurricane, was it Harvey, I think? Where they
were literally forcing people to sign documents that
made them pledge an oath to Israel before
they got
aid
from your government.
Very real story, and that happens all the
time. They've signed anti BDS pledges. I mean,
your government constantly acts in the interest of
foreign countries
ex at your expense.
But so to think about that,
keeping it in mind, let's go through, you
know, objectively what we're seeing. Because one of
the narratives we're seeing is that this was,
that the government is, you know, choosing not
to help,
which may be the case, which I I
don't think it's a I think it's just
they just don't care. But it's building towards
the idea which gets into the lithium conversation,
which is real, that this might be done
to take this land. But it it's interesting
because there's a real interest there in what
corporations and even the government might be wanting,
but it doesn't seem to line up with
what's actually happening.
That there is already something going forward, but
I'll make a point about how it could
be that they just don't like that it
might take longer than they want and that
maybe this could've been taken advantage of. Or
you could argue they
created a hurricane to do that, which, again,
all of this becomes really abstract. While certainly
possible, the evidence to back that up
altogether
does not seem to be there. But land
grab? A 100% that seems like a possibility.
Or the idea that this was like, in
that case, like Lahaina, you could argue whether
or not the other part of the story
was there. Every single time you have an
event like this, there's things that happen. You
find corporations that try to take advantage of
land that they want. Every single time. Right?
Every single time there's an emergency, you have
other people trying to take advantage of that
emergency for their benefit. You have government actions
trying to take advantage of the situation to
benefit their own political standing or to
line their own pockets at your expense. I
mean, this is every time. Or for example,
every time we have an emergency like this,
hurricane or otherwise,
you have the same things that happen, which
I don't agree with. And I'll point this
out as we go forward. You have the
government saying,
you can't come in and help people. Right?
You can't come in and help people. That's
our job. You can't donate unless it's through
certain channels.
All of that should bother you. But it's
not unique to right now,
which is kinda how it's being framed.
So let's start with Billy Bowling saying, I
understand the frustration with slow responses for these
tiny Appalachian towns. This is a main thoroughfare
connecting Damascus, Virginia to 5 other towns and
the North Carolina line. He says, it's just
gone.
Every route is like this in some way.
So first, what he's highlighting for you is
that and this is not to say excuse
for the government, not even remotely because that's
why I hope I just outlined. But nonetheless,
you can see why there may be a
genuine reason why people are unable to. Now
that again, to point out, there's helicopters. There's
plenty of other ways that they could as
the government if they really were able to
let's just take the 1,000,000,000 upon 1,000,000,000 upon
1,000,000,000 of dollars going to Israel and Ukraine
and just said, no. We're gonna use that
immediately to help you instead. Obviously, there wouldn't
be a problem. With that much money, you
could do whatever you want. But what he's
highlighting is that the roads, this main central
road here that will take you through, which
is where they would be used to get
a lot of this there, is basically inoperable.
So just keep that in mind. That does
play a factor. And it's right there. Look
at that. That's it's crazy. And there's a
lot of these. Just kinda jump through it
real quick. He goes along this road with
a drone. I mean, look. That's gone. That
road doesn't exist, guys. And apparently, as he's
saying, it's a main connection through multiple five
locations.
And this person says, is that highway 91
still closed as well? And he goes, 91
is open to mountain, but it's really bad
in spots. You better bring your patience. Just
showing you the images right
here. Okay. So that being said, there there's
clear damage on these roads which might hinder
any kind of a process. Just keep that
objective fact in mind. Ryan Teer points this
out, which I found interesting. Now he's as
in this is his experience,
but from other examples.
He says, if you're wondering why citizens are
being turned away that are coming to help,
which they are,
Which is disgusting, outrageous,
but not unique to this event.
He said that's both Tennessee and North Carolina.
He says, you'll want to hear my experience
as someone who has been doing this as
a private citizen for almost a decade.
He says, I was able to get into
and out of Asheville. We brought food, water,
fuel, and other supplies, as well as help
people affected by the floods. But there are
reasons why they are not allowing help outside
help.
He says, I cannot confirm the reasons why
North Carolina.
Even though he's saying that he has gone
in now. He's saying, but I can tell
you the reasons in other storms he's worked
at or worked in you know, were there
helping people.
He says, let me share with you the
first disaster area that I finally realized that
this was all about money.
So level 1, guys. Because we're we'll get
into the idea of other things we talked
about. But just level 1,
money. Government just corruption.
Whether local government, whether corporation corruption, whether individual
people trying to hawk things for higher prices.
There's always people taking advantage.
And that doesn't always tie back to some
larger conspiracy.
But what he's saying is that this he
has this experience. He's realized that all of
it is ultimately about money, which I think
we know. He says in the Florida Keys
with hurricane Irma. After Texas, we got hit
with Harvey. We finished our efforts in Texas
and were the 1st citizen team to make
it to Key Largo. He says the federal
agencies had US 1 shut down,
just sell the Key Largo, and wouldn't let
anyone in or out,
even though the road was okay to pass.
Now that to me, that seems strange. That
doesn't make any sense. Why would you stop
people from coming in? Now, of course, I
think their argument, which I don't really think
makes sense, is liability.
But that's not enough for me. There's somebody
as somebody was saying in one of these
comments before I went live, you don't need
the government's permission to help people. I don't
care what they say. I don't care what
bureaucratic nonsense they throw at you. You do
not need somebody's permission to be a human
being and help somebody in need. But that's
what they do.
It's kinda like the lie they say you're
not allowed to give food left over at
restaurants because liability. That's actually a false claim.
There's been plenty of legislation, federal and local
in many places, that say that doesn't apply.
That then they just do it. They just
dump it in trash anyway and pour bleach
over it because they're bad people. But at
the end of the day, it's the same
dynamic.
Right? I don't care if you claim it's
like, oh, you know, you could go in
and get hurt. Well, I'm a free person.
I don't need your allowance to risk my
life.
I ultimately don't think that's what it's about.
You can decide what the alternative could be.
But he said it says, we explained to
them that we had boats, jet skis, food,
water, chainsaws,
and fuel to bring to people who at
the moment were desperately in need of all
of those things and were not having those
needs met by the government. That happens every
time. Harvey was a great example of that.
They didn't care. Wouldn't let us in. Now
we're seeing that right now. Now of course,
that's in and of itself. That should be
a big deal. And we should highlight that.
We should seek to change it. But of
course, you get a lot of the partisan
players who are connecting the dot with that
to some bigger narrative. And the problem is,
even even if it may be,
you miss the immediacy of the point.
That is a problem. That should be enough
for people to be upset.
But when you try to lurch into something
else that you maybe you don't have all
the evidence for, we fail to highlight this
point. We don't have accountability for the immediacy
of this point. And it says, I was
night by it was night by that point
and you rarely saw the lights of vehicles
in the distance on the individual keys, meaning
the emergency response teams from FEMA
weren't even working.
It was all quiet.
He says, we decided that we would go
anyways.
We filled up the boats and jet skis
with all that we could reasonably carry, we
went by water, around their BS blockade, and
around their law enforcement presence on the water.
Doesn't that sound like Lahaina?
Right? Like it's just weirdly like just militarized
block down of yeah. That's very strange.
It was 87 miles by water to get
our first stop.
It says when we arrived there, we were
greeted by a homeowner. He says per per
privacy, won't give a name, though we have
video, who was elated to see us and
all the supplies we brought.
His house was in shambles.
We started offloading supplies on the shoreline and
helping to get them into what was left
of his house.
During that process,
he explained to us that FEMA had set
up a command center at a local high
school on the island,
but that they weren't doing anything to help
the residents,
not even bringing water.
Now what's also important I should note,
it's easy to want to believe everybody who
has everything to say all the time.
Well, that sounded confusing. Just every anybody wants
to speak up. It's easy to wanna take
them at face value because you don't wanna
believe they would lie when it's going on.
And, that's not most likely I would say
they probably don't, But, obviously, being objective, somebody
could easily, especially in the world today.
Everything is partisan right now. Everything. Especially when
it becomes partisan. When all of a sudden,
you got this weird partisan focus, well, then
you got people in that town that go,
well, hey, maybe I could say this. Maybe
I'll get on their show. Or maybe I
can say this and it'll help the agenda.
Because we you know, I believe it's true,
so I'll lie about it for my truth.
If you don't think that's possibly happening in
any discussion, you're lying to yourself. You know
it's happening in every discussion. Now that aside
though, my point is that maybe this per
let's just take this example so it's not
about North Carolina. This person in Florida,
maybe everybody else got helped and they ran
out and they get to help them. Right?
But yet, he reports to this guy, they're
not even helping. I didn't get anything.
See, I'm just trying to be objective here.
The point is you know how there could
be it's easy to kinda see what you
want. All I'm stressing is objectivity and caution.
Because I'm telling you guys, there's a lot
of people out there, I'm not gonna name
any names, people I've talked to in the
past, who were always the one that sticks
their head up in these stories. One of
the ones I pointed out in Lahaina who
got literally called out by the supporters who
said, we gave you all this money and
now you're staying in a 5 star hotel.
Yeah. And then and confronted live on TV.
Live on the re their stream.
They said, you didn't even show up. You
didn't you didn't even tell us you were
here. You promised. Blah blah blah. The point
is these people tend to pop up in
these situations.
Lots of backing funding,
even though they take donations.
And I think that these people have a
tendency to lean into whatever is the most
bombastic story. Whatever becomes the most contentious.
Even if it's not accurately backed up by
the facts. That's the mainstream alternative media for
you. But it goes on to say, instead,
he explained now again, I would argue the
reality is probably that. That he probably they
probably weren't helping because I actually think that's
more likely what's going on because I don't
think FEMA or your government cares. But objectively,
you can see what I said there does
make sense and is probably, in some cases,
happening. But he goes, instead, we explained that
we were driving around using a loud speaker
telling people to stay in their homes. They
weren't even helping the homeowners with supplies.
Or he explained that's what they were doing.
Just stay in your homes. They weren't giving
them anything. He says, I was skeptical at
first when he was telling me all of
this, but then he said something that broke
my heart.
He told us that the people of the
Keys were all in despair because they had
just seen weeks before
the overwhelming support for Texas with hurricane Harvey,
but by the citizens of this country.
He and his neighbors all in the all
on all of the Keys, the islands, felt
like Americans had forgotten about them completely. Because
at this point, 5 days after landfall,
all they had seen for was FEMA,
and they were of no help, at least
from his perspective.
The residents were cut off from the outside
world. Again, very familiar. Right? We're all this
is one of the things we're hearing now.
Why are they cutting off communication? Why are
why haven't they given them any way to
communicate?
Again, it very well could be some very
serious conspiracy.
But I want you to recognize that this
has been this is a kind of a
un not a unique dynamic. So that could
very well mean that every time there's something
weird happening. But I just wanna make sure
we're being objective about this.
It's saying,
excuse me,
cut off. No cellular, no Internet, no way
to contact anyone.
Now this could very well just be because
the local government like, I'm willing to bet
you,
even considering another larger part of the story,
that the local governments
probably have some kind of an internal dynamic
where they go, look, we need to cut
them off because we don't want this to
happen. We don't want them screening about how
we're failing or how we don't meet their
needs.
If that's what government does, guys. And I
guarantee you, they put them above your interest
every day of the week. It says the
only communication they had, this is still Florida,
was from a local radio station on the
Sugarloaf Key that was broadcasting on AM to
the surrounding Keys. The man, after hearing that
there were citizens trying to bring them help,
but being refused entry by federal law enforcement
was visibly upset.
He and his neighbors really thought the country
had abandoned them. He insisted that we get
into his waterlog truck and that we would
take us to that radio station so that
we could go live on the air, to
tell the citizens trapped in the keys that
we, the American people,
were there to help and that the government
was trying to stop our efforts.
And this is exactly what we did. After
that, we were determined to help as many
people as we could, but we were met
with red tape throughout the whole process.
And time
and the process and time we were in
the keys.
Which, again, that doesn't have to be a
conspiracy. It could just be government.
I mean, in and of itself, that should
drive us crazy. But my point is that
that should be a problem aside even if
there is a bigger screen that we that
we first recognize.
The bureaucracy,
the interest. What that really shows you is
their personal interest and their liability is more
important
than your safety, than your needs. Right? We
gotta make sure we're not accountable first. We
gotta make sure we don't get sued first.
Really?
Like, you I mean, some for some level,
you understand because they will they could get
sued. But my point is, if your interest
is helping people, then you shouldn't be blocking
anybody else.
Let the guy go up there with his
truck. Why? You it's you get the point.
And this is the same thing we see
every time, and it's frustrating.
He says, we finally were able to walk
talk to some authorities that led us down
to the certain areas towards the end of
the certain keys boot key. This was the
same hotel where state and local authorities were
staging their personnel and they were happy to
see us, apparently. He says, I was able
to coordinate several trucks full of supplies to
be brought down to a certain area.
I I'm just trying to wrap wrap Russ
through an EOC marathon. And since I was
privy to the EOC meeting, but was informed
in that meeting that all of them all
of the semi trucks full of food, water,
hydrogen supplies were to be turned around
and not allowed to be offloaded.
The reason they gave us
was that these donations, and this is also
happening today, guys, were not from companies on
their preferred vendors list,
which is just the cherry on top of
the outrage buyer, guys. That's incredible.
So not only are
you stopping people who have something that could
be helping for your own safety, your own
liability, you're literally stopping
company anything coming through. Even if it's handed
to you if it's not on the certain
list.
Now you can read so many things into
that.
You could I'm I won't try to jump
into the you guys can just that alone
should be outrageous. But there's plenty of things
you could try to find to connect to
that. Plenty of reasons why they might do
that. But your government is using I mean,
what would you call that?
They're more interested in
making sure their corporate allies are getting the
benefit than you may be surviving.
And it says, Anne, that they would not
accept them or give them to the residents
of the Keys impacted by the storm. He
said it was all at that point I
realized it's all about money. They're literally profiting,
if not a lot more, off of your
suffering.
It says these preferred vendors, in quotes, are
getting part of the money being released by
the state. And that's the disaster stuff. That's
the emergency released. When they declare emergency or
disaster, it opens the doors of floodgates to
this.
All the things we saw during the COVID
19 illusion,
circumventing laws or just ignoring them like usual,
funding that gets used
in the in the cares act dynamic. It
went to the exactly like we told you
it would. Major corporations, most of which didn't
have any concern about you.
Despite Trump screaming how it's all about small
business. No. No. Not even remotely.
It says in turn,
some of these vendors make it on the
list because of a friend that gets them
on the list. And in return for getting
ridiculously outlandish amounts of compensation for the services
they render, they also get kickbacks.
So accepting outside donations, even though they are
on on are on location and can help
people now,
they would rather let people suffer so they
can get their kickbacks.
This meeting solidified his resolve, he says, to
help these people, regardless of what the greedy
officials wanted. See my point? This in and
of itself could be exactly what's happening.
Don't dismiss other things, but realize that this
in and of itself is something worthy of
news coverage.
I diverted all semitrucks, he says, to the
Farrell Blanco Resort,
filed the entire first, filled the first floor
with pallets upon pallets of food, water, and
essential supplies, and created a food pantry for
residents to come and get anything and however
much they needed.
From local state troopers to the homeless, we're
all given wheelbarrows for barrels full of and
free rein to get anything they needed. We
also delivered supplies.
And it says, when FEMA finally started handing
out boxes of canned goods, limited to 1
per household, we were filling cars of food
and supplies for people and pets.
There's so much more to the story.
So my point is this happens every time.
Every single time.
So thank you, Ryan, for pointing this out.
I think it's important that we recognize that
this
is not unique to the situation, but it
is very important that we change that dynamic
because it doesn't ever change, which is kinda
my point I keep making.
Saudi Agris points out,
here's bootygegg saying, drone pilots, don't fly over
the house.
Don't fly over the recovery area. Now, I
think you can obviously hear what they might
say.
We're flying operations in to help, and you
might get in the way. Well, clearly, you're
not, though. Not really.
Either way, I don't agree with that. Whether
or not there's a liability issue, the point
is the same. I think it's about making
sure, like, they cut like, they don't rapidly
reconnect communication
is they just kinda don't want this to
be seen. Because there's always ways we can
criticize their response and they know that. Even
if it's unjust. So they just don't want
you to be able to do so. If
that's what's happening, you can decide for yourself.
But not allowing the drone flights in kinda
seems like the same thing. Now realize, they
could literally be flying things in with drones.
But they're not.
And Sal says, as I agree, they prefer
you died.
You will always be, at best, an inconvenience
to the political class.
That's not left or right. As he said
recently, there's no red, there's no blue. There
is the state, and there is you. That's
the reality.
Now, axiomatic entity of the state says without
government,
who would threaten to throw you in a
cage for helping people in distress?
Right? Gotta have that.
Obviously, a little bit of humor on the
sad face, you know, the kind of macabre
side of it. But he's making a good
point.
Who else would throw you in jail for
being a human being?
True story media makes the point about the
FEMA or TEMA, which is the Tennessee emergency,
same thing from Tennessee.
As they writes,
all the people saying that FEMA didn't or
wouldn't say that that, you know, that they
won't allow donations with even though we just
showed you a previous example, this is their
post.
Affected counties are beginning to establish local donation
and volunteer recip reception centers. And this is
pleased with the link.
It says, while local communities appreciate the volunteer
spirit,
please do not,
in
capitals,
send donations
that have not been requested by the state.
How in the world does anybody make sense
of that?
Eve especially while you know right now is
you'll hear from people, Again, taking with a
grain of salt that there could be they
they could be misinformed. They could be the
only one. They could be lying. Not assuming
that.
In fact, I would say what what the
logical way to look at this is accepting
what they're saying, but keeping in mind that
they could be misinformed. Right?
The point, nonetheless,
they're telling you we don't have enough. We're
struggling right now. And they're turning away stuff?
Well, yes.
That's crazy, but again, not unique to the
situation.
That but that blows my mind that we
pretend like that that's maybe it's always been
happening.
And like he just said, what else could
it be but money?
Now just to show you, but the that
same thing's happening. There's I've seen a lot
of these. This is insulin, at least according
to Foxy Farmer, being delivered by Pack Mule.
Literally by Pack Mule.
The point is that whether this is, you
know, these are videos we're finding on Twitter.
There's a lot of examples of people who
are, you know, trying to bring boats in,
trying to bring and many of the cases
being turned down, but people are trying. And
I just wanna use that as a point
to highlight that this is the powerful nature
of just, you know, human resilience. The people
that are saying, you know what? Screw you,
government. We don't care that you're telling us
we're not allowed to help people. We're gonna
help them anyway.
That's what inspires me. And that is happening.
So all that being said, let's talk about
the idea of the funding part of this.
Because this is my opinion, the most obviously
provable part that should outrage everybody.
As chief of their rights today, this is
Kamala Harris saying $750
$750 for Americans.
It says today,
$750
oh, hold on. I thought it was subtitles.
Yeah. That's all she's saying.
Right. So he here's,
I mean, less than a grand in in
a time when I mean, it's like here
get some gumballs in the reality of the
world today. I mean, obviously, that's more facetious,
but that's pretty wild. Now even if you
think that's somehow enough for people who are
struggling in a disaster zone.
What chief nerd writes, of course, is 750
for Americans. 6 days ago, 2,400,000,000
for Ukraine.
And let's let's scroll down so we can
include oh, wait. No. There's nothing else. I'm
sorry. I thought there was more to be
read.
I'm being facetious, obviously. I said, did you
just forget to include the 100 of 1,000,000,000
of tax dollars going to Israel
since October 7th alone?
Of course not. As Michael points out, the
anti war party is always entirely relaxed about
financing Israel.
Exactly. Here's Bennie Johnson. Kamala just told us
750.
We also send 1,000,000,000 to Ukraine.
It's just funny to me that, you know,
they can make that point, but then
kind of like across the board,
not concerned about the Israel funding? Well, wouldn't
that be the same point? Well, it wouldn't
because they are agreement. They they are okay
with that. We see the point shouldn't be
about which war you're okay with. It should
be about whatever. Even if you agree with
the wars. That money is going over there,
but not to you. But you see, it's
very, very telling. It is a very conspicuous
omission. It's the silence is deafening
to not include that point because it would
make the same it's the same point. You
should just simply say foreign policy funding, but
there's a reason that all of these Republicans
are not highlighting the Israel funding.
I'm sure you could piece that together.
Which is pretty disgusting, I think. But here's
Isabella Maria DeLucco pointing out something important, the
real picture. She says, so this so far
this year, the United States has given and
again, these are numbers that I'm sure are
there's always kind of an ebb and flow
to this, whether they're including
all the funding that went to tangible groups
or the for the aid versus military. It's
always the game, but, generally, the point is
the same.
This is just crazy amount of money we're
talking about
to to Ukraine in general.
24,000,000,000
doll $24,000,000,000,400,000,000
to Ukraine,
which to be clear, that's my point here.
Israel is a hell of a lot more
than that. So just just in general, so
you know, just in the last
few weeks,
the US gave another $20,000,000,000
to Israel. Just Israel. A week before that,
the US gave them $3,500,000,000.
Prior to that, they gave them $17,000,000,000
about a month before that. That's nearly $50,000,000,000
just in the last few months. And October
7th was a year ago. So I just
wanna make sure we understand that this is
not that it's weird how the numbers get
manipulated around Israel more than anybody else. It's
very obvious why. But 11,000,000,000
is not the full picture. Okay? But so
my point is it's more than Ukraine, but
that's why and they're but the people on
the right don't want you to highlight that.
Obviously, Israel would be the obvious right point
seeing as how more money's gone to Israel
than anybody else, but they're okay with it.
Same point. But to what they're pointing out
here,
24,000,000,000,
over 50,000,000,000 going to Israel,
almost 2,000,000,000 to Ethiopia,
1,600,000,000
to Jordan, 1,400,000,000
to Egypt, 1,100,000,000
to Afghanistan,
11.1 to Somalia, $11,000,000,000
to Yemen, $987,000,000
to Congo, $896,000,000
to Syria, $9,000
as they're riding per illegal immigrant that's entered
the US. Now, you can go into that
as you want, there's all sorts of political
nuance to that conversation, but nonetheless, the point's
the same.
Why?
Why is your government giving money to either
illegal immigrants or immigrants or foreign countries or
anything else while Americans are suffering? That's not
a racist point. That's just an objective reality.
They're the US government.
Americans are struggling and they're dumping money in
anyone's hands other than Americans. I mean, it's
the same during COVID 19, giving you a
a a insulting check for, you know, a
small amount of money when they're down the
largest transfer of wealth in this country's history
took place in the hands of elitist oligarchs
because of Donald Trump, and it would've been
Biden the same if he was there at
that time.
That is a huge point.
Obviously, we should scream about how they're not
helping Americans while dumping this much money in
foreign hands, especially while they're committing a genocide,
or especially while they're a Neo Nazi government.
But that's not the focal point. It should
be though.
It is for a lot of people, at
least it's a part of it.
But and then she writes, and Americans who
have lost everything to hurricane Helane will be
getting a hun $750
from FEMA.
That is really crazy. There's no nobody should
be trying to pretend there's some kind of
nuance to that. That that is just straight
up outrageous. Now this is a New York
post article, which I gotta be honest, more
than any platform right now in the context
of Israel and the foreign policy, New York
post is showing itself to be the National
Enquirer. Like, really disgustingly bad. They've been caught
pair pair like, more than I think almost
the you the sole
parrot
of what Israel keeps saying in many of
these recent discussions that have later turned out
to be exact opposite. But the New York
Post just said what Israel said. So I
just wanna make sure we remember that. I
think Robert's gonna be working on art. There's
a new story that came out today that
I mean, it's just, cartoonish.
About a girl that was kidnapped by ISIS
and then given to Hamas and then just
got rescued. But and to the best of
our understanding and research so far is a
ridiculously false story. But Robert's investigating. We're gonna
come out with that, I think, soon. The
point though is that that's a New York
post article is the point. But this is
an article from the 3rd from, yeah, today.
Feds say there's no money left to respond
to hurricanes.
Now that is what is being said.
I don't I don't think they're saying because
we set money on immigrants. That's how they're
framing it. But it's still a fair point.
The idea that there's but see, my frame
will be what I was just saying.
Whether
it's migrants,
whether it's foreign governments, whether it's military spending,
none of this should be happening while the
if they're barely getting I mean, not helping
Americans.
Because that's your money.
But we should know this by now. They
don't care about you. So whatever the discussion,
the point is that there's they're going, well,
sorry.
Sorry.
Really? So you can print money and just
dump money in the hands of foreign genocidal
governments whenever you want because
it's just a fake fiat money, but not
when you need it, not when schools need
textbooks. No. No. No. We're gonna you see
my point? It's insulting. And we all know
that. Left or right or the reality of
the unity party of all of them, not
the unity party. They're all the same thing.
They don't care about you.
And I know they would love to pretend
that, like, Trump, if he was there, he
would do I don't know why you guys
have this opinion.
He has a track record. It's pretty clear.
He there was examples we just talked about
Texas. Right? There's examples where he's in power
where the same exact thing happens. And even
more so where you're signing pledges to Israel
to get that aid.
That should matter to you.
Just a thought here, who by the way,
I have an article she gave she sent
to tea lab that I'm gonna publish soon.
I had been so much going on. I
haven't had a chance and anyway, we're gonna
get to these a lot of different things
coming soon. But I I really respect her
opinion. I think she's very insightful. She says,
it's really really important that you understand what
is happening here. We are experiencing a controlled
demolition of our government. They are exposing their
own corruption. Now, again, I you can disagree
with or not whether this is why, but
what she gets at
is I I agree all the the point
is whether you think it's controlled demolition and
they want you to see that you decide
for yourself. But I think it's a valid
point to consider.
They are exposing their own corruption and hatred
of the people.
They want you to scream
for their dismantlement.
Then this is kind of the engineered collapse.
Right? She's saying, we should dismantle our government,
but we should not look to technocrats
to take their
place, which I see everywhere right now,
which is exactly what the plan is, she
says. Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and the like
will step in, and the people will cheer
them on.
Scary how real that seems to be happening.
Beg for their help.
But what they'll usher in? Digital IDs, CBDCs,
biometrics to cross the border, brain chips, millions
of satellites, Starlink, which by the way I'll
show it next. For more surveillance, drone warfare,
remote shutdown of cars, and the Internet will
be like something from a terrifying dystopian sci
fi film. But this is not a sci
fi film. This is happening. There are 1,000,000,000
being funneled into all of this and more.
There's no denying it. Please have discernment in
these days in the days weeks months, the
years to come. You're going to need it.
And she's highlighting this. Same thing we're just
showing you. Right? The idea that this is
you know, the point is there is a
level of reality here.
I mean, it's not just a level. This
is the reality. Not the the part of
no money. They were dumping money in wars
around the world and don't have enough for
Americans.
And and her point is that's they're kinda
going, look.
The government's failing you because they are. They
always have been. But now it's being really
highlighted at their point is that engineered collapse.
Consider that. It's a fair point to make.
But this is what I was gonna say
about STARLINK
as the cradle points out. And don't forget,
I've made this point in many other discussions.
Honduras, for example, as they deploy Elon Musk
deploys Starlink for Prospera and not all of
Honduras, which is specifically something that is taking
territory from Honduras we've gone into the past,
or Starlink in Ukraine for the Neo Nazi
government, or Starlink
in pow in in occupied Palestine for Israel
to use to genocide Palestinians, or really, as
the Krayal's highlighting, Starlink in Yemen, which just
happened, a Trojan horse for espionage? I would
even say for regime change. I think what
it demonstrates is a precursor for war.
Now there's obvious an examples where that may
not be the case.
Because it's just it can be used in
any number of ways. My point is that
I think when it's the massive deployment in
certain locations, that implies something more than just
we wanna help people. Now it maybe that
means nothing in this context.
But they're claiming to rush this out for
people in North Carolina.
I just want us to think about this.
Even if you think it's helping you in
this moment, is it we should at least
consider whether this is some kind of a
mess like, filling the role of what's needed
and now all of a sudden, like, realize
that I at least in my personal pers
opinion, I don't trust what this is being
done what's being done with this.
I don't trust that Starlink is in the
interest of any other than the military industrial
complex.
So just be concerned about just because Elon
Musk, don't blindly assume it's on your side
or not the problem. It's all just your
government. He is a military contractor. He is
an elitist oligarch technocrat.
So make sure you recognize that. So and
read this for yourself. But if as this
is deployed in all the current fields of
war, maybe we should ask whether there's something
more than just that correlation.
And that's the
I'll leave it alone. I'm just gonna say
something else. But, the to get into the
point about
lithium or rather just a land grab to
start for the most part.
I find this to be a very relevant
point
Because there is lithium there. And obviously, that
is a monumental point. I genuinely think that
one, if not the only reason, but definitely
one of the reasons we see the Venezuelan
efforts is lithium. The reason we see Bolivia
overthrown is, if lee one of the main
reasons for the lithium. As don't forget, Elon
himself
said on Twitter, we'll coup whoever we want,
in response to taking lithium from Bolivia,
which he clearly is invested in. He is
an active proponent of in electric vehicles.
Weirdly enough, while the argument is that that's
why this is happening, because the great reset
and sustainable 2030 agenda for all the vehicles
in 50 minute cities, and then Elon Musk
is a complete supporter of that.
But let's ignore that because we don't wanna
see how that connects.
But starting here, David Icke points out, on
the first and I've seen a lot of
these.
I I don't what whatever whether you trust
the person or not, if all you're getting
is this somebody said this or was a
comment over here, you shouldn't just take it
at face value. Consider it like anything else.
It's a data point. But I'm getting a
lot of these that I keep seeing circulated.
Where people are saying, I just got this
comment. And weirdly enough, what I keep seeing
is other people sharing the same thing. So
either they all got the same comment or
it's one of those things that's being copied,
repeated online, which means that probably should be
wondering what's going on. Not this one, but
same point though. Because he's saying email from
somebody.
Right? So just keep in mind, it could
they could be lying, they could be wrong.
But it says, they have been offering
me to buy my property for cash constantly,
which I don't even know why anybody would
doubt that. There's huge lithium deposits, one of
the largest in the world in this location.
So obviously, somebody would wanna buy it.
And it says, only one way in and
out.
Nobody allowed to move. That's in regard to
the current dynamic. Trucks with aid and supplies
are getting their tires slashed so they cannot
reach their destination.
Now, again, maybe that last part is not
real. Maybe he saw that and it's it's
somebody else, or maybe it happened and had
nothing to do with it. Or maybe they're
slashing tires to stop the aid.
Make sure we're being objective.
Oh, by the way, don't forget Derek's got
an interview coming out with Ike very soon.
Now, Angel points out the Kings Mountain, which
is the location we're talking about, is smack
dab in the middle of the flooded zone.
The and the al al,
Abel Morrow I I I I'm trying to
make to make sure I pronounce this before
and I'm gonna screw it up.
Albel, it's,
Albemarle.
God, how did I say that before? It's
a a strange word. A l b e
m r. This is the company we're talking
about. It's the corporation.
Albemarle. I'm gonna say Albemarle. I think that's
what I said before before the show. But
Albemarle Corporation
is the and again, largest shareholder, stockholder is
both Vanguard and BlackRock, which by the way,
so is Rumble
for objectivity. Okay? It's funny. But I I
think this def I definitely feel this matters.
But there's a lot of people saying it's
owned by BlackRock.
It just becomes simple. Right? But if you're
gonna claim that, then BlackRock owns Rumble more
than they do this company. Just to make
sure we understand the the more stock involved
in Rumble, but they're just shareholders. But either
way, the point is
they're under contract.
Abel Marl Marl is under contract for $90,000,000
to mine lithium in the area, which is
true. Sorta feels intentional, all of it. That's
what that's what they're arguing. Now certainly a
valid thing to consider.
Now, first point, without any other information would
be, did they are they taking advantage of
the storm
to swoop in and take land? Well, I
mean, that's I I I don't even know
why we'd dispute that. In every single situation,
if there's a storm or a a destabilizing
event in a location where there is somebody
with value or a property with value, there
will be somebody trying to swoop in.
And that's not okay. I'm just saying that's
just the dynamic. That in and of itself
can happen outside of any other conspiracy concept.
That people, whether real estate agents like we
saw in Lahaina, people are salivating about this
stuff. So right now, there is 1,000,000,000 of
dollars under this land, and people are seeing
an opportunity.
So
is it intentional? Which I guess the only
reason the only way you could make sense
of that would be that the storm was
created.
Right? Or in the case that the this
point, that they're ultimately
extending the ex the emergency, stopping the aid
to force them out. Now that would make
more sense. But so those I those I
say were the 3 possible dynamics.
The potential of manufacturing a storm to do
it,
taking advantage of it after the fact to
just try to set force them off their
land, or in the middle, maybe
stretching out the emergency to drive them out
of their land. All those are certainly possible.
Some of them more so than others, right?
But clearly, we have to acknowledge the possibility
of every one of them.
So keeping this in mind, here's what Corey
Diggs had to say. I greatly respect their
work. Now this is important.
Because again, here this person said, does anybody
else think it's weird that BlackRock signed a
$90,000,000 contract? Not true.
This company did, and they're one of the
shareholders, and that's only, like, 12%. Oh, yeah.
Right there. 8.4 for BlackRock, Vanguard 12%.
Actually I'll grab this really quick for for
context.
This is the rumble stock page,
and you can see very clearly.
Oh, actually I take it back. I thought
it was more than that. May I it's
probably shifted 10¢, to be honest. But here's
vanguard at set almost 7%. Black rocket won.
Same point though. I could've swore that was
higher. Let me know in the chat if
you remember that being higher last time we
looked at it. And these things do fluctuate.
But anyway, the point is, if you're gonna
make the criticism
that it matters that these are shareholders for
a company, then you damn well better make
that criticism for Rumble. But my point is
that all the people that do would make
the claim would omit that because Rumble is
the one that they're using. So it's just
it shows you a lack of objectivity.
Not any money in particular, but just where
that might be happening. But see, Corey points
this out. No BlackRock didn't sign a $90,000,000
contract. That's just not true.
The the DOD funding
Albemarle
Corporation, $90,000,000,
and many others.
BlackRock has 8.48%
share. Vanguard, 12.18.
2 years to obtain permits to proceed on
existing a mine from 19 thirties. And I'll
go over all this in an article. The
point is this is from an old mine
that they're basically trying to revitalize. And it's
an ongoing thing right now. It's not as
far as I can tell, there's one point
I'll make about how they might just feel
that it's going to be hindered, but as
as far as I can tell, it's all
in the process. So the question would become,
why would they do this if it was
all going in their direction anyway? Right? Just
a logical point. But it says both have
shares in Piedmont, just north of with Permihs,
who is failing.
The point here is that there's many others
in these similar locations that are already, you
know, happening. But it says the DOD and
Department of Energy have been on the lithium
funding strategy for quite some time now.
Again, in the article, we'll read or show
you how the it's just exploded, the the
the the value, which is now suddenly why
this is all happening. It says, I could
post a a slew of links on companies
they funded 1,000,000 to. Here's the DOD
20 23 to 20 30 lithium battery strategy
that Corey Diggs personally thinks is going to
fail. Here's the link, business defense.
She read, so the DOD is funding
Abel Morrow $90,000,000
to reopen
the Kings Mountain Mine, which will take a
minimum of 2 years to obtain permits
with links. The d o the the Department
of Energy has which, by the way, seems
to be where Elon is gravitating towards, has
funded
Piedmont, or at least one of the possibilities,
by the way.
A $141,000,000
for mining in Tennessee, which they recently had
to bail on.
There's been a major drop in lithium prices,
and it's hurting Piedmont and others. Now there
was a spike that went crazy, and then
it came back down. So the point is
there was, like, a a big rush, and
they all put a lot of effort into
it, and then it kinda went down a
lot.
Now all of a sudden, these things are
struggling.
Not I mean, struggling's not the best word,
but, you know, the point is if you
invest a lot and it drops by half,
you're gonna lose money. But it says Piedmont
already has permits just north of Kings Mountain,
but still needs a zoning variance and a
lot of cash.
Says if and when Abel Morrow obtains permits,
which is in the process,
their project, this is very important,
pla their project plan sits south
of the town,
not through it, which is what everyone's reporting.
It says I wouldn't I wouldn't want it
anywhere near my town.
If they succeed with permits, it wouldn't begin
until 2026.
Now, of course, as as we just showed
you before,
what they're showing you on the map is
where Kings Mountain is, not where the proposed
location would be.
Seems pretty lazy. Right? They're saying that's smack
dab in the middle. Well, not really.
Right? Kings Mountain is in the middle of
the storm, but where this is located would
be away from that.
Which is still in re in regards to
the actual storm, but just realize that these
might it's when you can see a lack
of odd like, where you if they're reporting
that, that means they didn't do the due
diligence. That means they jumped and just said,
look at that. It connects.
Be careful. That might not even be intentional.
It could just be lazy.
But the point being that this is going
there this is an ongoing process, and it
seems to be out in the middle of
town, outside of it. And it says, you
can see the geological survey in 1942.
And all these are linked, by the way.
BlackRock has a healthy mining portfolio in a
lot of locations, as does Vanguard. Based on
all evidence,
finishing saying, I do do do I think
they steer the storm to hit this town?
No. Do I think EV cars will be
the future? No. That's their their their opinion.
Re regarding homes, this is BlackRock doesn't purchase
homes. They invest in builders like this one
who coincidentally own 3 rental communities in Asheville,
Fairview, and Black Mountain.
All areas impacted by the hurricane. Right? So
what's funny is if you came out and
just said, they're not purchasing homes, you would
get a reflexive
push back from people who think that's what's
happening. But when you actually read what they're
saying,
they're adding to it. Right? The point is
that maybe they don't buy homes, but they
clearly have a profit motive
to, in some way, influence the situation. So
I I 100%
think that's what these companies are capable of,
If not do actively all the time. Finishing,
it says, for absolute clarity, read their comprehensive
report on the US housing market. Homeowners and
mom and pop investors are kick kicking butt.
There are a lot of misconceptions out there.
Who really owned the US housing market?
Always doing great work.
Include this one for you. Now let's go
further on this.
Here, by the way, is just an actual
report from September.
BlackRock Inc's strategic acquisition
of Albemarle Corp shares. That's what we just
saw. Same point. Was it, 8.4,
12% being Vanguard? But nonetheless,
important. I do not wanna diminish that I
think that's important. I do think, as we've
talked about before that Black Rock is a
very important aspect to all this. What's very
obvious is rarely overlaps, but I'm gonna include
one of the articles we put out about
this, one of the shows, in regard to
the COVID 19 conversation where they had a
plan that they they laid out before the
COVID 19 illusion, basically taking over the US
economy, the US in, financial interests,
and then use that plan that reguise a
COVID 19. The COVID coup, the BlackRock takeover
of American interests.
That's who we're dealing with, and it is
very real. But, of course, you're not gonna
hear that in many cases when it goes
against other interests.
But here's one thing I wanna point out.
The because there is an easy overlap here
in one way, which is that Albemarle
Corporation
is a US based chemicals manufacturer.
They entered into a long term arrangement with
Israeli Chemicals Limited
to supply global flame retardants.
You know what the primary one was?
They are the sole provider of white phosphorus
to the US Army
all the way up until 2013.
The US has supplied white phosphorus projectiles to
the Israeli military, which deployed them in its
assault on Gaza.
Not even making a case that's somehow connected.
I just find that to be interesting. That
this company that's actively trying to take control
of the lithium dynamic in this and and
just the mine itself, if not more, which
is kind of the set the argument right
now, you can decide,
is the sum is a company that has
been involved with creating white phosphorus that's used
in foreign wars that are absolute war crimes.
Just find that pretty interesting.
And then here, Heretz, Israel chem Israel Israel
chemicals entering joint venture with Albemarle of the
United States.
I just find that interesting. And that's the
same point. That's about chemicals and white phosphorus.
This is in 2014.
Here's Jerusalem Post. Israeli space tech startup.
And whenever you hear that, that's that's tech
startup, that's a u n a 200 overlap.
That's what that means. They can now apparently
locate lithium deposits on Earth.
2022.
That's Astera.
And 1 if there's 2 of them in
fact doing similar things. I just just make
overlapping points I find interesting. Clearly, I think
Israel has an interest because of their tech
focus in regard to rare earth minerals and
so does the United States. And so that
could play a factor in what we're dealing
with here. On top of that,
this is
from 2023.
One second.
From 2023,
Iran lithium field discovery
to change balance of power.
Israeli media.
Just overlapping conversations today. I find it interesting
how the point here is only to make
the point that is or rather, lithium or
rare earth minerals in general, as we already
know if you've been watching this show or
plenty of others,
are a central
play. It's a huge factor of what's going
on today.
So you just have to see how this
could be moving a lot of different pieces
than just what we're talking about today.
Now in, oh, larger point, I wanna include
the article about Israel's infiltration of US tech
in light of the pager attack, but realizing
that there's more infiltration than we have talked
about today, which I've gone over in previous
shows. And a one quick point on that,
declassified UK points out,
the the the MOD admitted
in in in answer to the parliamentary question
that there were 6 Israeli military officers
posted in the United Kingdom.
Think about that.
So not only are they on the ground,
and Gaza, they have, Israeli military personnel in
positions in the UK.
You could read that as advisory
or you could read that as control.
You could decide for yourself. Why in the
world would there be Israeli military positions in
the UK?
Aren't we supposed to believe that's a little
tiny outbound, little tiny country? How could they
influence? Yeah. You tell me.
Very weird.
Now
let's get back into this.
For those that were asking, you know, in
general, Kings Mountain, North Carolina. And this is
from the Albemarle website.
As they write, the area is well known
for its lithium resources.
And this is an article from
maybe there were some of these don't have
dates on them usually, but yeah. This is
from before. This is not super recent, but
it's not old. It's well known and it
says in fact, Kings Mountain,
according to
a, Albert Meryl,
is believed to have one of the largest
resources in the world.
Now if you don't think that matters, you're
not paying attention to how the world works.
That is that could they could literally move
mountains, no pun intended, in regard to how
these things could change dynamic. That's a that's
a lot of money. A spare at a
time when that,
amongst a few things, may be the most
important things they're looking for today over oil,
over gold.
Now here's an article from Daily Mail. America's
Lithia Boom Hits North Carolina.
This is from 2023.
DOD to reopen Kings Mountain. Now here's what's
important.
Actually, I should've probably done the this article
first, which we're gonna go into next. You'll
see why why I say that. Because the
point is the history they outlined there is
that ultimately, this was a place that goes
back to the thirties, forties, and it was
a a big lithium
mine. And ultimately, it it lost its
profitability, its interest. Ultimately, it waned and they
and it stopped. It just went defunct and
they stopped using it.
What rainwater filled it and, you know, it
just became a big hole with water in
it. Now then, all of a sudden, lithium
starts exploding again because of the focus on
in electric cars. And now, all of a
sudden, they wanna reopen it. Okay? So what
happens is the DOD, the Department of Defense,
wants to reopen the mine.
And this is where the contract comes. So
your government is doing this for their interest,
not because of just money,
but much more. But my point is that
so this happened.
They then they start they kinda reopened it.
But then in between September and now, there
was a lot of pushback,
a lot of resistance, and they had to
push. They had to extend it out. Now
that's the point of this. This well, and
this was all the same one from September.
But here is a report from May,
2024. So this is September 2023.
May in 2024,
and lithium giant, Albemarle's plans to reopen
the mine will take years to complete. So
the point is there's a whole extension here
where people are pushing back. So the reason
I'm including this point
is that I think there is an opening
there for a logical conclusion for why they
might wanna take advantage of what's happening here
or cause something
because they felt like this might not meet
the needs of the immediacy of the fluctuating
lithium price. Which by the way, again,
talking 1,000,000,000 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars. Like, that
is something that might drive a lot of
action.
Just if I I'm just kinda skipping over
a lot of back and forth, then it
goes over in this article next. But the
point is that the people in the town,
other restrictions, all sorts of things started changing
this dynamic, and it wasn't as simple as
that we were moving forward. So now we're
all the way to now, not just in
May, but right to this day, where now
they're they're estimating 2026.
A lot and even in now, the town
is sort of pushing back in certain ways,
right up until the storm. So it's not
hard to see how there is an opening
for that potential concept.
Nobody should dismiss that. But if we end
up where we can't prove definitively that it
is happening, we should just lean in to
what's most exciting.
Well, let's go through this article. Now this
goes back to this is August 2024.
The lithium boom,
and they write, what's holding back the rush?
The lithium rush in the United States. There's
a lot in this thing you should read.
It's basically an interview with multiple people. You
should read through it. It's interesting. But let's
go to the part that stand out stood
out to me. Now I'm just gonna skip
the basically, I'll I'll do this real quick.
Here's who they're talking to, and I'm not
gonna go over each one of the names
every time. But Hengly,
cofounder of People of Red Mountain, an activist
group working to protect indigenous lands.
Lay Larry McDaniel
is at is King Mountain, North Carolina resident
who's basically speaking about the process and what's
been going on over the period of time
for 38
And then Daniel Green,
he's a resident
who's actually worked at the mine.
Jim Palanik,
city manager of Kings Mountain. And then you
got re Rafe Soli who's the CEO of
Lilac Solutions, a California based lithium ex- extraction
company, giving you kind of context on, on
what might happen, right?
So here,
this person is commenting and again, just to
show you the first one anyway, that was,
oh did I not say that guy's name?
Hold on.
Oh, so that's that's one of the interviewers.
Sorry, so just confusing myself. So this this
name here, Chakkar Bharati. So starting this, it
says, but when it comes to lithium
that's still in the ground
in the United States that has some of
the largest lithium deposits in the world, at
least 14,000,000 metric tons
according to US Geological Survey. That's not just
North Carolina. So that's one thing to consider.
There's a lot of stuff in this that's
just kind of, you know, adding to your
understanding.
A lot of those deposits are in Kings
Mountain, North Carolina. Population, roughly 1212,000.
Pretty small. Nestled in the foothills of the
Blue Ridge Mountains about 30 miles west of
Charlotte.
From 1938
to 1988,
lithium from Kings Mountain was a key ingredient
in the whole range of global products.
Things I I forgot one reason why it
diminished was because they found cheaper versions of
it elsewhere. It was just things like ceramics,
glass, pharmaceuticals, pacemakers,
paints.
For about 30 years,
the region supplied this location, mind you, supplied
almost all the lithium in the world.
That's a claim being made by this article,
but that's a crazy Think about how crazy
Think about how important that makes this location
when this suddenly rises again.
Very important to consider.
Now it goes on to say, but by
1988,
lithium demand dropped.
The the, food the the Foot Mountain Mineral
Company shut down Kings Mountain Mine.
Deposits in Chile
were cheaper to extract.
Now the foot mount let me make sure
that's actually what that says.
Yeah. Foot mountain oops.
That's what it was. F o o t.
How did I just lose that? There it
is.
F o o t
e.
Foot mountain
Foot Mineral closed the mine,
but Kings Mountain Lithium processing facility remained open.
Today
now, it's interesting. I wonder how could they
could remain open with nothing on what what
have they been doing this whole time? Not
that that name necessarily has any meaning. I
just don't think interesting point.
Maybe they had some contract or something we
don't know about for that had nothing to
do with it. But, anyway, so they remained
open. Today,
less than 1% of global lithium is mined
in the United States. And all that does
is coming from Nevada.
Now it just sounds like the familiar tale
of an American community,
once home to important industry and good jobs
abandoned for cheaper materials and labor abroad. Now
this is something that we need to recognize.
As much as Trump loves to say he
fights for this and in case I've seen
examples where he does do that,
My point is that all of them, in
my opinion, would air on the side of
what is in the interest of the government.
And based and that's manufacturing at the end
of the day, the price. So when they
tell you we're gonna bring this home, we're
gonna bring this new lithium plant to this
location.
What's gonna change from a year from now?
Finding a cheaper source and doing something else?
Because they don't really care about you. They
care about extracting the wealth from you. At
your expense, just like they do in foreign
countries. That's my opinion anyway. May maybe I'm
jaded.
Maybe there's companies out there that are actually
good be I don't believe that. But my
because I think my point is it's it's
how the the industry works because of the
way our government operates. You don't exist. And
if you're not cutthroat in this world, in
regard to the companies and how they got
the you know, how they operate.
But
they make a point in this about the
coal companies. I think I think I highlighted,
maybe not. You know, these coal companies, same
thing. They come in, they extract, they live
all the wealth gets moved somewhere else. And
the people in those countries get nothing. And
the the counties get nothing for it. Maybe,
you know, they they're promised to the jobs
and the world and everything, and they rarely
get that. And now we've already seen the
same thing with the defense industry. Right? Oh,
we're gonna do this in defense industry, and
then they outsource to foreign countries.
That's what they do.
Now it says Kings Mountain could supply a
million
to a million and a half electric vehicles.
That's what they're arguing is the positive thing
to do. They're the whole thing is about
saving the planet with lithium despite the fact
that I think we all have recognized that
largely a manipulation.
And let's not forget that Elon Musk
is actively in he said it many times.
Sub he says stopping production of electric vehicles
rather than fossil fuels is extremely dumb.
Well, most of the people supporting Trump's administration
disagree with that. But he says almost all
vehicles will be purely electric. Long term, combustion
cars will be niched, like horses.
Now you could agree with that.
Or I think it's interesting that he's part
of an administration that, I mean, Vance seems
to be, like, outwardly against this. I find
that interesting.
But maybe you wanna pretend it's because they
have different opinions, and that's okay. I think
we're gonna see that's not the case once
the administration starts moving forward, but I hope
I'm wrong.
But it goes on to say,
as a result, the price of lithium has
skyrocketed.
In 2022 alone,
lithium prices shot up by 400%,
reaching a high of 50,000 per ton. Now
that's what started the conversation. Right? Everyone was
ramping, just chomping at the bit to get
something like this going. But because there was
pushback, right, September 2023, they were reinitiating. It
was moving, and then it and it just
kind of floundered a bit, and the price
went back down.
That's interesting because I think that's caused a
lot of this kind of up up and
down. But it's still very high, mind you.
There's still a huge push for this. But
I think the it the realization
that actually making a feasible market from this
is not it's like the windmill stuff or
any number of these things, or the solar.
There's a use for this stuff. But to
pretend that it can be immediately scalable has
already been shown to be false.
Maybe by design. You can decide. But it
says, Abel Morre, Abel Morre declined an interview
request, but it said the that the mine
will create 300 jobs and can open as
soon as 2026.
300 jobs does not seem like a lot
for what they're doing. But it says Jim
Palenik is Kings Mountain City Manager. He supports
o reopening the mine. But he says if
Kings Mountain is going to play a major
role in America's clean energy future, pretending like
that's all it is even though it's actually
gonna destroy the area, he wants more benefits
to stay in this community.
And he says, I really feel for some
some of Oh, that's where he references it.
Some of those West Virginia coal communities where,
you know, you have a big open pit
mine that got great value, took it out
of the ground, but not much of that
ever went back to the poor or even
the community at all. The West Virginia coal
mining community.
Why?
Because your government exploited you guys. The company
was allowed to exploit you because the government
allowed it.
So it happens.
So we want to take a lesson from
those and say you're not going to leave
this community that way. Now to be very
clear about that, I'm not suggesting the government
should always have a say over corporate actions
or companies. But my point is that that's
what we dealt with there. We've seen a,
what's the word? A a a,
I'm just blanking on the word.
Incestuous relationship between the government and these corporations.
A fascistic relationship where they do
work together to exploit you while pointing at
each other.
Now this says in 2022, inflation reduction act
comes with hefty e, electric vehicle tax credits,
but they only apply,
interestingly enough, if the materials used to make
the vehicles,
the batteries included,
come from the United States. Or nations in
free trade agreements with the United States. Isn't
that funny? So who cares? Like, here's what's
funny. Let's pretend like you think that's all
the right direction.
Then we should do this because we're saving
the planet. Right? But we're only gonna save
it if it's a group we agree with.
Right? Because that makes sense. Right? We won't
save the planet if Iran wants to help.
We won't save the planet if Russia wants
to help. Even if they're the only ones
wanting to help. We'll let the planet die
because we don't wanna work with bad guys.
Okay. Just does not seem a little dumb?
What that needs to show you is that
that's not really about saving the planet. If
it was we're all gonna die if we
don't do it, they wouldn't be drawing lines
on who they could do it with. Right?
My point though is that
how do you make it only about coming
from the United States? So what you're trying
to do there is force the industry back
into the United States, which will exploit these
communities, even though I think we know this
is not scale.
So, again, it's about you and money and
profit. It has nothing to do with what
they're actually claiming it does. Because if you
really just wanted to do this to save
the planet, well, you would've give them credits
if they simply use it. But I think
the point is that's not how this actually
works because that's not what's actually happening. But
it says, hence, the vast sums of federal
funding such as the $240,000,000
that already went to Albemarle Corporation, North Carolina
for lithium mining.
And it says, when we spoke with your
colleagues, Patrick Donnelly, he described the coming expansion
of mining activity in the west as so
large, it makes the gold rush pale in
comparison.
So if you're ready for this massive mining
explosion for lithium that's gonna destroy like, you've
seen what these mines look like in foreign
countries. Right? Now you could argue that they
would take more care when they probably would
with your country versus places that they don't
care about. But I kinda don't I I
don't think they care about any of us.
So my point is, as if they're telling
you the this will pale the comparison to
the gold rush that's coming to you soon,
that should be concerning.
And ask whether we think lithium is even
what we actually all care about, as opposed
to just what the government and the intelligence
apparatus
cares about.
It could be the largest expansion of mining
activity in the history of the Western United
States, they say. It says there are 83
lithium mine proposals. 83 in ver in Nevada
alone.
And there are a 130
across the west.
It's worrisome.
Those are basically 2 kinds or there these
are 2 basically, 2 kinds of lithium mines
extractions that they have. The Albemarle plant in
North Carolina
in and here in in, oh, no. They're
speaking about this. So the Albemarle plant is
the company that they're building in Nevada or
in in North Carolina, but they're referencing their
plant in Nevada. And they're saying it is
brine evaporation operation.
It says, so what that means is they're
pumping brine out of the ground.
About
3.6326000000000,
that's with a b, 1,000,000,000 gallons of water
are pumped out of, operation every year.
And it says, and the water is essentially
evaporated off, which leaves behind salt deposits, which
are then processed.
Anybody wanna ask what happens to the, you
know, maybe the 3.6 billion gallons of water
that we might need?
Sorta like how they don't care that we
use God built gallons and gallons of water
to frack that also causes earthquakes and destroys
the I mean, they don't care about what
they're doing to the planet while they pretend
they're saving the planet. Pretty stupid.
My point is that this is clearly,
objectively damaging to the environment, but the water
seems to be shockingly relevant to where the
world is going.
And that you realize that they're they're saying
a year, s
let's just on the small side, 3,000,000,000
gallons of water from this location a year,
what do you think that's gonna do to
the surrounding environment? Maybe that's why when you
look at pictures of what they've done in
these areas, that's what they tend to look
like. Bare and wastelands because that's what they're
doing.
It goes on to say, that's massive. That's
a huge land use con commitment.
Again, that's the thing think that's not just
some tiny little group that there's a huge
land commitment to what they're doing. And it
says, and I don't have an exact figure
for you, but I can tell you that
both here in Nevada and in South America
and coming to North Carolina, you can look
at Google Earth
and then see
these he
these see these things pretty clear from the
satellite.
So if you're in a community of 12,000
people,
do you want them building some massive
mining operation from you can see from space
that's That's gonna I mean, I don't think
any whether they promise to give kickbacks or
not, I don't think anybody would want what's
gonna happen here. It says, so it's a
significant use of space.
Now again, I'm not saying maybe there's oh,
they're gonna do it different way that won't
cause that fallout. But I my point is
that the the mother looks bad in the
surface, what they're taking from the ground, I
think, has long term consequences.
Then it says, what we've seen at the
Silver Peak facility, for example, is that even
though that's extracting brine,
it has caused the freshwater aquifers to area
to drop.
But what they're saying is somebody he asked
about the brine. The point is even though
they're it's called brine, it's still natural water
resources in the ground. It's not like the
byproduct of something. So they're extracting water from
under the ground, and they're telling you, we
saw immediate examples of freshwater aquifers dropping.
Is that what you want, North Carolina?
I wouldn't want that.
And it says the groundwater level in wells
have gone down, and springs have gone dry.
I hope you're listening out there because this
is what's coming your way.
This is because most of the places where
lithium is being mined or could be mined
in the future in this country are located
within 35 miles of native American reservations.
That's interesting.
Now finishing.
Again, Elon Musk, many tweets about how electric
vehicles of the future. I just want you
to recognize one of the many points of
showing you how if this was anybody else,
people would be calling these things out. I
think that's important.
Now this says, Alvaro unveiled its new details
for lithium mines as residents ask, how do
we benefit?
I think there was only one point that
I was gonna highlight, but really
yeah. I mean, just showing you that they
plan for a 12 fa a 1200 acre
mine,
30 miles west of Charlotte. So think about
that. So as they're all showing you this
location on a map right in the middle
of the storm,
where they're really gonna build is 30 miles
away from that.
That's important, don't you think?
I just think that some all these people
out there jumping to conclusions about things, and
even if they turn to be right, the
point is that the it's we have to
be clear how much of this is a
problem, and I'm not saying it should be
censored. But we just need to acknowledge that
there's a and I honestly think it's deliberate.
I think it's to
obfuscate
and water down what independent media are genuinely
doing.
Here's the consequences. Then
it will end with the the weather modification
point.
Water pollution.
Particular and and that is particularly
with brine extraction.
Exactly what they say they're gonna do in
North Carolina.
Water pollution, not just diminishing.
It can contaminate fresh water sources.
Chemical treatments used. And they're only 30 miles
away. I guarantee that's gonna have lasting effects.
The process can leak into irrigation, drinking water
supplies, as seen in Tibet and China.
Sure. But why would we want I mean,
you realize the idea of these the only
reason they claim that this is necessary is
to save the world from climate change that
is clearly not even the reality.
Now we're absolutely destroying the planet doing things
like this, which I think is concerning.
But the game of carbon and the it's
we are being tricked, guys. I think it's
obvious. Experts around the world are telling you
that.
Selemization.
It says removing brine from underground lowers the
water table, which we just read.
Atmospheric pollution.
Extracting lithium from lithium rich clays involves atmospheric
pollution from processing minerals and chemical reactions.
Land degradation.
Lithium mining can lead to land degradation as
seen in the Nevada project, which we just
referenced. That's Abilme that's Abil Merrell Corporation,
where a giant pit will be created, potentially
contaminating groundwater, leaving behind waste.
Loss of biodiversity,
which is, by the way, literally one of
the things they're claiming this is going to
add to. And it says mining operation can
disrupt ecosystems threatening local biodiversity.
Social consequences,
displacement of communities,
health risks,
exposure to toxic chemicals, heavy machinery can obviously
pose health risks. Economic inequality,
cultural heritage law. I mean, this just goes
on and on mitigation. I mean, it it
doesn't stop.
And again, just this is just a couple
of random images, but you could see
what these things look like.
They turn places that weren't that were might
have been fertile into a barren wasteland or
a chemical wasteland.
It's sad. And yet we're being told this
is the future. Right?
And you know, who knows? Maybe you think
it is.
But if that's the case, then we need
to acknowledge that we're not ready to take
that step yet. Because that's not how it
should end up. Now, I'm gonna end with
this clip I'll play really quick. I'll end,
but I'm gonna play this really quickly, and
then I'll end with some links I'll show
you.
Because I look. Here here's the and I'm
not gonna take that much time on this
because I think this is a very valid
point. I don't know, right now, it it's
up to you whether you think that this
is part of what happened here.
My bigger point is that this is
100%
a real discussion.
And I'm not just talking about geoengineering. I'm
talking about literal weather modification,
the use of all sorts of different things,
whether electronic or or, you know, particle ionization,
like, all sorts of things, or just using
devices that pump things atmospheric.
What's the word I'm looking for?
Like, we talked about this in Harvey. The
design to these things that, like, literally pump,
like, mistype things into the air, which have
proven to have effects on the weather or
the things we talked about in South America
where car companies are using devices that stop
the hail,
but then have caused droughts for the surrounding
areas. Like, all we if they explicitly prove
as and so do all the patents, by
the way, or all the real time investigations
that show you that they absolutely have done
this, or the military telling you they've done
it.
So for someone to dismiss the possibility
for 1,000,000,000 of dollars seems a little bit
naive, doesn't it? But my perspective at this
point is that I have not seen, like
so what I'm gonna show you from Dane
Wigginton here
is this is why I respect Dane. He's
a very, very smart person. He knows what
he's talking about. But some what he ends
up highlighting for people can seem a little
bit outrageous because they have yet to understand
what's really going on.
But I'm gonna play his clip for you
to show you one of the many possibilities,
and he argues what you're seeing here is
what it what's driving it.
But, again, I would argue I don't know
how you could argue that that means you
could guarantee like, you can decide for yourself.
All I wanna end with is the reality
that this is certainly a possibility,
and for you to come to your own
conclusions about what ultimately went down.
But do not miss the reality of the
criminality or the malfeasance that is inexplicit
in the first part of this conversation, and
we should seek to change that first before
we even get into anything else. But then,
yes, get into the rest of this. So
here's what Dain said. Was the hurricane Helene's
path and behavior just an act of nature?
What do you think?
Hurricane Helene's path and behavior
just the result of natural processes and climate
patterns, or was it manipulated?
The circular blue flashes seen in this video
are frequency transmissions from the Nexrad network of
transmitter installations.
All available science evidence makes clear that atmospheric
frequency transmissions can and do have a repelling
effect
on air masses, especially if and when the
air masses have been seeded with electrically conductive
nanoparticles.
The brighter the blue flash from a frequency
transmission installation, the more pronounced and powerful the
repelling effect on any air mass or storm
in the vicinity will be. Now the question
is, did they do that?
Right? So to be clear, what I I
would agree, what he's saying scientifically,
100% is possible. I mean, there's again, there
are patents for these things. It doesn't mean
patents don't mean they're real or exist, but
it means that at least they argue the
technology is sound, and my or at least
they think they could make it sound. And
my point is what he's saying scientifically is
completely accurate. But in my from my understanding,
But did they do that? Do we have
evidence of them seeding these things? Well, I
would argue we have evidence
1000 times over of cloud seeding, of geoengineering,
of stratospheric aerosol injection,
of exactly what he's talking about. But my
question is, can we prove it now in
this location before this happened? And if you
can, reach out to me. I would love
to talk about it. Where there are no
blue flashes, there is no transmission, thus no
repelling effect,
thus no resistance
for a migrating storm. Translation,
a migrating storm will be hindered from moving
toward frequency transmissions and will easily migrate in
a direction with no transmissions.
So, again, I ask, was hurricane Helene's path
and behavior just an act of nature, or
was it engineered?
You decide.
Which again, is why I respect his work.
He's not screaming that you think this. He
wants you to make your own conclusions based
on his
scientific delivery.
It's it's, it's upsetting to me that someone
like Dane gets such little discussion around this.
I think it's the same reason that probably
we do or don't. You know? Because it's
not coming from some aggressive partisan side. But
I'm gonna end with these, these previous discussions
we've had. This one goes back to 2020
or the oh, this was actually not that
old. Oh, excuse me. I forgot I moved
him around. This one I have 2 interviews
with Dane Wigginton. This one's from 2024 in
February.
Geoengineering,
nanotech, and bio carrier plot biocarrier platforms for
pathogen dispersion.
It's actually really crazy. The the opening clip
in this is from his documentary showing you
the patents, how they're using these planes to
do exactly that, and he gets into this
really alarming overlap.
This one, we discussed the geo the kind
of climate change lie overlap. This one's entitled
geoengineering and the climate change or end climate
change, gambling with the human species.
It's a really interesting discussion.
Now this one goes back to 2017.
This one is called cloud seeding. Was
cloud seeding was used before hurricane Harvey. Was
it responsible?
Important to check out. This one was a
show that I did for 2017.
This is the one that really started my
path in understanding how serious this is, how
obvious this is. I simply titled it, weather
is being engineered in the gulf. Evidence that
is hard to deny.
Now, unfortunately, when I went to go check
to see if the articles of these were
in here, the YouTube was taken down a
long time ago. But for some reason, I
can't the the
BitChute version just won't play. And I was
able to it won't let me download it.
I can't find it anywhere. So I'm gonna
try to find this. I reached out to
BitChute to say, hey. Is your can you
fix this? Because I can't find this video
anywhere. But I wanted you to see it
because it's this is the one that gets
into this exact conversation about showing Harvey
essentially being
driven on
and then powering up over the land. Hurricanes
don't do that. And then we can show
you using these thermal discussions of where it
was being charged and then you can prove
where these little plants were, where you can
see these little it's very fascinating to me.
And then even the every time it went
over a landmass, it seemed to get another
boost that doesn't make sense with hurricanes. You
can decide for yourself. But I was fully
convinced that there was something going on here.
To what end? That's for you to decide.
Then this goes back a long way to
2016.
I covered this a long time ago. This
was actually an article I wrote entitled,
government quietly admits weather modification.
And all it came back to was an
article or a a little,
ad
put in his paper.
And it it it was a notice of
intent saying the county of Los Angeles Department
of Public Works hereby gives a notice of
intention to conduct a weather modification program.
That's the guess. It's what it's just not
a joke. It's a very public discussion. And,
of course, everybody's like, oh, it's just cloud
seeding. We all knew about that except in
in many other context, cloud seeding is also
the United States. This is funny to me.
But
this is an interesting conversation. I overlap that
with government q and a's from harp and,
you know, it's it's an interesting conversation. I
wrote this a long time ago back when
I was writing more. I should do more
of today. And I will end with this
one from 2017,
geoengineering.
The US history and cover up of stratospheric
experimentation.
Very, very, very, very, very easy to prove.
And it goes long before the Brennan example
of the CFR saying we're gonna look at
this or Harvard. It goes back a long
way and you can very easily prove it.
So should you be denying this possibility? Absolutely
not. What can we prove that that was
the responsible re the responsible
action for why this happened? I I so
I think it's up in the air. And
I I would love to see you guys
send me whatever you have on that because
I do find I'm very interested if we
think we can prove that. But, again, going
back to the main point of it all,
we don't need to kinda cobble together these
3 different parts to see that each one
of them by themselves is worthy of conversation.
So let's focus on this story. Let's focus
on not just the suffering of people because
of weather event, but ask whether or not
there's a government malfeasance happening here. Are they
deliberately holding back aid? Yes. Are they stopping
donations from unallowable
entities, which I guarantee in some way overlaps
with some foreign discussion like we saw with
Harvey. But, yes, they're doing that. That alone
should be stopped immediately. There are people with
with food and and energy and
and medical aid that are saying, we're want
we wanna help them. And they won't let
them go.
Now, again, they're gonna say, oh, you're gonna
hurt yourself. But that at what point did
the government start making it their job to
remove all danger from your life? Even though
we know they don't actually care about that,
they use that as an excuse to stop
you when they want to.
So as always, partisan manipulation is everywhere.
Discussion of Israel,
everywhere.
Omission of how it'll matter. I mean, every
topic we've gone over today, it's obvious the
partisan angle is desperately trying to slant it
in their direction,
which is why you watch this channel, which
is why you support groups
that are objective and nonpartisan.
Hopefully, you listen to all of them, including
them too, but come to your own conclusions
and don't fall into one camp or the
other, even if that's our camp, guys.
It's important to make sure we objectively consider
all perspectives.
Because otherwise, you're choosing to
you're choosing a narrative as opposed to
what's the right word?
Invasively
investigating. I just let you know, not just
looking into it, but really taking your time
to dig through, which is why we do
4 hour shows or 5 hour shows like
yesterday. Because it's important to take the time
to understand these things and not just parrot
headlines, which is what everyone seems to do
today in the partisanship.
So thank you for continuing to support this
platform, guys. The links will be included below
for you to support. We need your support
as always. We're gonna continue to fight no
matter what.
So stay with us. I love you all.
As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.