Jews still standing with Israel? The government of
Israel may claim to represent you and protect,
quote, our kind, but Jewish people are not
synonymous with the Israeli state. You as an
individual Jewish person do not bomb aid workers,
journalists, medical infrastructure, and refugee camps, bulldoze homes,
indiscriminately kill children, or torture people. You didn't
blow up an ally's ship, plot and commit
terror attacks, including on civilians, try to work
with literal Nazis, displace 100 of thousands of
people, or prop up Hamas as a power
play. That's individuals working for the Israeli government,
hallucinating magical authority and claiming to act in
your name. Conversely, the government of Israel is
not your family that was persecuted, hunted in
pogroms, and shipped off to death camps, as
members of my family were. But the people
running this government desperately need you to believe
that they're synonymous with you, your ancestors, your
faith, and your very sense of self, so
you continue to view this government as a
victim rather than a perpetrator. This government exploits
your family's suffering and trauma to maintain your
support for the destruction of innumerable families. Likewise,
this government needs you to believe that all
Palestinians are Hamas or whatever authority claims to
act on their behalf. To say nothing of
the highly misleading narrative that a majority of
Palestinians or Gazans elected Hamas, would you wanna
be punished for the actions and policies of
politicians in the ruling class you voted for?
Or for those others elected with a slim
majority? Speaking of Hamas, it's obviously absolutely wrong
to kill civilians. And when you support the
same behavior because, well, your enemy did it,
you can't claim the moral high ground. Further,
the government of Israel doesn't even protect Jews.
Its agents abuse not just Palestinians, but also
Jews who dare to protest, and this state
keeps endangering Jews there by radicalizing surrounding people
through indiscriminate violence, seething collectivism, and dehumanization,
exactly what Israel's proponents claim the state was
created to guard against. However much you may
identify with Israel, I repeat, you are literally
not Israel. No matter how hard governments around
the world, not just Israel, try to convince
people that We, the people, are the government.
There's one class of mortal humans who believe
they have special authority to inflict violence and
control others because they work for government, and
they're the rest of us. On that note,
Israel has no right to self defense because
Israel is not a self, nor is any
other government. This gross, diluted propaganda gets otherwise
decent people to support heinous acts out of
fear and weaponized collectivism.
Likewise, not all Germans, Chinese people, Russians, Americans,
or others commit unspeakable atrocities. A small group
of people calling themselves governments and ruling powers
do, cheered on by the poor souls duped
by pro government collectivist propaganda, who at times
even commit that violence themselves.
Additionally, we as Americans are not arming the
government of Israel despite their ongoing extermination of
Palestinians, politicians, and their defense contractor cronies are.
To the Jews conflating themselves with the state
of Israel, please get a grip and stop
lending your identity to a government that abuses
its, quote, own people and eradicates those it
deems less than human. And to some of
the actual anti semites, not people who condemn
Israel's condemnable behavior, Israel is an abusive and
corrupt because it's run by Jews. It's abusive
and corrupt because it's a government and all
governments necessarily rely on violence to assert authority,
which invariably leads to abuses of power. So
one last time to the Jews standing with
Israel, you are not the Israeli government and
you're not committing these atrocities, but your blind
support for this state allows its agents abuses
to continue in a sick irony where past
hatred, collectivism, and brutality are used as fanatic
justifications for present hatred, collectivism, and brutality.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Wednesday, October 2, 2024. Thank you for joining
me today. Gotta start with Carrie Wedler.
Some the somebody out there talks almost as
fast as me. Maybe faster. It's hard to
tell. But outstanding.
Always doing an outstanding job of just rapid
fire breaking down on the facts.
And as a Jew herself speaking about this,
telling you that if you're blinded by the
illusion out there around any number of things
she was highlighting there, there were it's just
like with the COVID 19 conversation.
You are the majority. They're trying desperately to
convince you that you are not, that you
are the crazy fringe lunatic, whether that's about
seeing through the 2 party illusion, recognize
recognizing Israel is carrying out genocide or your
own government carrying out illegal occupation, war crimes
around the world. Everybody sees these things. Different
flavors. And and this is I mean, you
could call that
wishful thinking. You could say that's maybe hyperbolic.
I genuinely think that's the provable reality. Just
like I said during COVID, just like I'm
genuinely saying now around elections and 2 party
illusion,
I think people for lack of options get
driven into these things.
So to start with her there, I just
wanted to make sure we kinda set the
tone for, you know, not just that one
topic. We're gonna talk about a few different
things today and gosh darn it, it's gonna
probably be a long show. So as always,
I'll do my best to get down as
fast as I can. Not really. I mean,
by just today, I'm probably gonna sit down
and let this go as long as it
does because I think it's important. And we
haven't had a show in a couple days,
so I think it's important. Been really feeling
under the weather the last so many days,
so it's been difficult for me to even
keep been trying to keep up on a
lot of these things. Now this story we're
gonna start with today around Georgia is something
that's it's been going on for, I mean,
almost what? Almost a week. Maybe 4 to
5 days.
And it's important that I go not, you
know, breaking news coverage on this, but something
that really kinda floored me when I do
when I went through this in-depth today around,
you know, because you know I have a
I have a whether it's just about medical
freedom, whether it's about environmental disasters coming. Really,
not even just the disaster itself because these
things can just happen. Sometimes it is just
incompetence or, you know, not a the story
that sometimes we try to find within these
events.
But
oftentimes, the story really is just incompetence
that they
should have done something more. The government loosened
restriction, you know, loosened the you know, any
number of things that are the story. Right?
The fact that it happened, like, with East
Palestine, obviously, as my mind is going, that's
a huge and is still was then and
is a huge story that went nowhere,
obviously, because government corruption. And that alone is
probably the reason it didn't happen. Nobody went
to jail. But because of the I think,
quite frankly, as I'm gonna play a clip
about today, this budding, fake, independent media field
absolutely gotta just same with, like, Lahaina, for
example.
Very valid reasons to get into a lot
of these peripheral parts of the story which
are fascinating,
entertaining, but also very important because it's possible
that there was a lot more going on
there. And I do think as you watch
my coverage. I'm convinced there was more to
that story. But when you start getting into
the ridiculousness of the the Peters of the
world out there, the way that they covered
this,
it gets people looking for something above the
criminality that's right in front of you. And
I think there's part of a design there,
whether they know it or not. Where, like
I've said then, you know, missing the forest
for the trees. Why did nobody go to
jail for the out the overt criminality around
how that went down? The lack of,
listen. They're saying it's not playing on YouTube.
Hold on. Let me double let me what
was my point? The lack of accountability around
East Palestine.
Let me double check this really quickly. I
think I know what the problem was. Sometimes
sometimes, you know, it's not that I honestly
care that much about YouTube these days, but
sometimes they have a redundancy where they have
to, like it'll make me check things twice
or refresh things twice. It's just I'm telling
you it's because they know what I'm doing.
So let's see if this fixes the problem.
I just had to basically refresh the page
and maybe it'll pick it up this time.
But anyway, the point coming back to and
let me know,
I guess you wouldn't know because you won't
see this on YouTube until it starts playing.
But let me know who else is paying
attention or, well, if you're watching this on
other channels if it starts picking up on
YouTube.
But where I was is the ultimate point
is that, you know, around the East Palestine
story, and I think I kinda did lose
my point. I lied.
But then ultimately, the the bottom line being
that the it's obvious that these people should've
gone to jail. That was the general point
that instead we're focusing on the other larger
the possibilities.
And around Lahaina or East Palestine for example,
there were crimes that were committed that were
undeniable.
And again, back to Lahaina, like, even just
the lack of, you know I I there's
a genuine cry like malfeasance is an actual
thing. It's government
in
malfeasance is the best word to describe it,
but the point being is that that's a
government failing to do what it's expected of
them to do.
And and and like a legal sense. Right?
And so they have an obligation to do
this and they show and they didn't or
they failed to, and there's accountability there even
if it was a mistake. The problem is
this never happens. People should have been held
accountable for the lack of water, the turning
off of the water, the the the lack
of deployment, the the way that they directed
people or East Palestine, for example, the way
that we can now prove, as we'll get
into today, prove that they misdirected deliberately the
local fire department, lied to them, withheld information,
did things that they knew were to the
detriment of the location and the benefit of
their own liability and nobody did anything about
it because everybody, and still okay to do
so, but were looking for other stories, but
the problem the not okay to do so
in my mind is ignoring
and not focusing on the actual criminality that
we could have put people in jail for.
And so my point in saying all this
is we're gonna talk about Georgia today as
well as another story from Ohio that I
think is an obvious I mean, like, literally
without question, in my opinion, I'll give you
the science to back it up, a huge
dioxin problem or a risk of dioxin issue,
even with what was released, even with the
fact that it can dissipate the idea or,
in this case, I'm thinking of Ohio at
the same time, but the burning of the
factory we're gonna get to, there's no question
with that large of a fire with what
was burning that this is was a massive
dioxin release.
There's no question. Now vinyl chloride was with
East Palestine. We're literally talking about chlorine specifically
which is the main component that exact that
is like the the foundational reason for the
toxin creation along with the burning of other
material. And so the problem is that if
we know that, why is that not being
discussed?
Why are they being told to shelter in
place when the obvious issue should have been
to immediately get the f out of there
as fast as possible because of this risk
on top of the risk that were already
there. Now I'm not even gonna get into
how they should have dealt with it. I'm
just my only concern is to make sure
the residents of these locations are aware of
what I see in the data, come to
your own conclusions about it, and maybe take
a little bit of extra precaution based on
how it went down with East Palestine now
that we sort of generally know that it
went 5 states across the country. Even though
we were saying that day 1, 2, and
3, and they were calling you crazy for
saying that and allowed people to stay within
a 1 mile radius and now they're gonna
get cancer, which is not an opinion, guys.
The reality I should not every single person,
but it's already happening. So anyway, obviously these
stories bother me because of the lack of
accountability, but we're gonna start with that discussion
and we're gonna get into, you know, it
connects with a few different things, but the
overlap there, we'll we'll talk about a few
different overlapping stories that have to do with
that accountability.
And I think dioxins are really the issue
for me around that, but we're gonna talk
about another kinda partisan point that I wanted
to get into that I think is very
interesting
around the conversation of, I guess I get
just just call it 2 party illusion conversation
that I think is relevant to a larger
conversation. And then we're gonna talk about from
there forward the foreign policy dynamic around Iran,
Israel,
Lebanon, Gaza, which is still happening.
And the way that I mean, the one
I kinda plucked out for the title today
is the idea,
undeniably, by the way, even corporate media, shockingly
enough, highlighting this in some cases in the
kind of dark corners of the end of
the mainstream field that nobody sees. My point
is they write articles in the back corner,
bottom page, which you can see if you
know where it's at, but they're not really
promoting it. It's a classic tactic of the
corporate media to say we talked about it,
but it wasn't really highlighted.
The idea that they knew what they were
doing, faking diplomacy, just like with Soleimani, by
the way. Donald Trump assassination under the guise
of diplomacy, which is a not just a
massive war crime, but just, you know, makes
it that much worse because you're using it
as a guise as opposed to just committing
a crime. That's the thing I always say.
You're pretending to be diplomatic while then using
that lie, which is a crime in and
of itself to then carry out another war
crime. But they use the guy the guise
of diplomacy to to assassinate
Nasralla,
freaking blank on the first name all of
a sudden. Give me the name full name
in the chat.
But overall, the point being that this has
happened more than once now. Knowing that they're
using this even with with the assassination of
assassination, the bombing of civilian buildings, but also
the overlap with Iran, Lebanon, and every other
thing they're doing. They're they're playing people around
the let's for for example, the guys of
the ceasefire to act like this might be
happening and then people take action in accordance
with that and then they use that to
take advantage of the situation. The pier, for
example. We all see how that went down.
This long, very expensive process that led to
the use of that guise of a pier
to murder civilians that they otherwise claim they
were going to be using to help them
to feed them.
I mean, it's just it's actually really grotesque.
And it's the thing I the general point
I was saying a second ago.
Somebody who murders people is a horrible person.
Right? That's just detestable. You're a you're a
murderer. You're disgusting. You deserve to rot in
a jail cell. People that then murder
but then pretend to be good. There's a
whole another layer
of of just disgusting. But even more than
that, people that murder or rape or pillage
and then pretend to be the good guy
and then ask for you to praise them
for it.
That I'm I'm actually doing right by the
world, so you tell me I'm a good
person and then we go on carrying out
raping and murdering. That's what we're dealing with.
It's the, in my mind, the epitome of
evil, the worst of the worst.
Tell me how I'm wrong. Now you can
decide who that is, but we have to
acknowledge there's a special level to that. Now
when there's a lot to get into around
Lebanon and Israel and what's going on. I'm
gonna give you the updates today on the
where it currently is at, the back and
forth of it all. And I mean, it's
and it's seemingly increasing quite a bit. So
as I said, a lot to get into
today. So sit down, engage with this, write
down things, discuss, take out clips, make sure
we discuss these things with people around you
that you wanna have, you know,
engaging somebody that you want to like, my
point where what I was in my mind
just right now was about the idea of
making sure you find people that are willing
to have conversations about things even if you
disagree. That's more unique than it should be
today. And then reach out to those people,
whether it's my show or somebody else's or
other multiple shows, and
and create some kind of a routine where
you discuss these things. And it can be
whatever channel, whatever content, but make a point
to do so where you discuss the content,
you debate the content, you bring up other
opinions and perspectives,
and and make it a common thing. Challenge
your own ideas. The fact that this is
so rare in the mainstream alternative media or
nonexistent
is everything you need to see. My point
in saying that is because these things are
challenging ideas, and I even I get conflicted
about where I see it. And so having
somebody else to discuss these things with and
bounce ideas off of and debate or disagree,
it it it's the it's very important to
a informed electorate, if you will, or an
informed individual depending on what we're talking about.
But I'm gonna start today with oh, just
a quick shout out to Carrie Wedler because
really I just really just absolutely love what
she does. It's fantastic. We are very similar
minded, which is probably why I think, you
know, the the idea of the just government
is the problem and I wholeheartedly
agree with that, Which is kind of the
root for a lot of my mindset around,
you know, why people that know this show
know that we'll talk about different things and
like right now I'm much more concerned about
where the the Trump feel Vance call, like,
kind of manipulation is going. But those that
know what I'm talk know what I feel
in my background and my opinion know that
I they're all the same thing to me.
Kamala, Trump, it's your government. Or for that
matter, whether we're talking about Iran or their
government or Russia or China, their own government
to me. And I'm e e equally capable
of calling out what part of these or
what side or what nation
I see or the governments within that are
the problem of the moment, but that never
should be taken as then the other side
is good. That binary thinking is a trap.
My opinion, they're all part of the problem.
I could if I could remove all of
them right now, I would.
My point though is that we have to
recognize and be honest with ourselves about who
is the actual problem in these dynamics. And
I think it's obvious right now that the
US government and Israel are leading this world
in a very, very dangerous direction.
And I you could argue amongst yourselves of
where you think that the US or Israel
is which one's the meek follower? The one
that's unable to stop the other? But really,
at the end of the day, it's hard
they're both doing it. I mean, and the
reason I say that is because from my
side of it, I think it's clear that
the US government is just being manipulated, I
mean, everywhere. Whether Trump or Biden, by the
way, or whoever else is stuck in that
position. And I think this is self evident.
But the point is, recognize that they are
leading us in this dangerous direction. And I'm
gonna make this clear to you, my opinion,
but I'm gonna make it clear with the
facts around what's going on around Iran and
how this is being played out.
Whether you think good or bad or whatever
you perceive it as, what they're doing right
now is, in fact, very clearly trying to
pull this back from the from the precipice.
And everything every act they do that may
lead in a way to truly deescalate is
taken advantage of. But they're weak, and we're
gonna go harder because that's what the US
and Israel are. It's what they do. They
are the living embodiment of what they've always
claimed the Soviet Union was and all these
the history the bad guys that are all
in power and strength and villainy and attack.
That's what they are, and it's obvious based
on the way they conduct their foreign policy.
Okay. I'll leave it there. Now to start
off, I want to
talk about a couple of kind of, you
know, random points that I think are important
around,
I guess, the election for the most part
or other or the debate. And just a
couple of things I didn't know where else
to fit in that I wanted to talk
about before we get into Georgia.
Tim Iverson says this, based on my conversation
with Normies, not on Twitter, this post debate
assessment is completely accurate. Now, frankly, if you
want my tr my as always, my opinion?
I can't find I can find very few
things on the planet that I care less
about than a vice presidential debate. Let's be
really honest. This game they play where, look,
but Kamala is vice president now, so shouldn't
everything be what you want?
Like, not even they think that. That's a
really stupid take playing on the ignorance of
most people. A vice president is damn well
ineffectual in that position as we all generally
know. There's power to it. Yes. They can
influence things, but we all I mean, it's
kind of like this accepted understanding that it's
a pretty
it's a sick it's a it's
a symbolic
job in most ways. And I I mean,
it's that's kind of an over characterization because,
yes, there are things they can do, especially
when you wanna argue right now that Biden
is just not there. But even then, it
doesn't just hand the power to Kamala Harris.
It's not the way it really works. But
it might be anyway. The point is
that this debate, and usually, in in a
vice presidential debate is very meaningless when it
comes to the overall dynamic. And what she's
simply saying is and, again, that's my opinion.
I'm sure people disagree, especially right now because
politics means everything.
It's really not.
But she's saying if you if you don't
agree with the idea that that she says
unless you're hyper partisan, both Vance and Waltz
came out even and improved their images.
That's what she thinks. I didn't watch it.
I don't frankly care about it. But it
says if you don't agree with this, it's
possibly a sign that you're partisan and no
longer operating from a level minded place. That's
what I wanna come at the come at
this from.
That
I think everybody trapped in this, and I'm
increasingly seeing Kim hold a similar position about
just the fact that people in the 2
party illusion
are the same thing. I mean, different flavors
of the same manipulation, the same,
you know, hollow arguments, the same you know,
because it's the same kind of manipulation in
my opinion. Of course, I could be wrong.
But the fact is that ultimately, these two
people kinda went at the the same like,
ultimately, I mean, frankly, I don't even waste
time on getting into the breaking down a
bit. The point is that she's arguing that
they ultimately came out of it the same,
and that she's arguing that if you don't
feel that way, it's probably because you see
it from a partisan angle, which is the
same thing with the Trump and and, and,
Biden discussion. Or rather, excuse me, Kamal at
this point, where ultimately, it's well,
you know, they both have their shortcomings. They
both have their ridiculousness. They both again, I
they're I think they're ultimately the same thing.
But she says the same people who could
clearly see
the same people who could clearly see average
voters didn't or don't care about Trump's wild
tweets
can't seem to grasp the average voter doesn't
care about Wall's misspeaking.
I'm she says, I'm seriously so fed up
with partisan MAGA. I would say it from
either side of this, but I agree there's
a focus just like there was on COVID
to the left, on the right right now,
from the establishment, from whatever you wanna call
deep state. Just when I had hoped, she
says, for them they prove their brain rot
is real on both sides. That's my point.
That's what's interesting is that she's arguing that
all this stuff doesn't matter. And that's what
I'm getting at is that at the end
of the day, people have made their minds
up. Anybody out there that still pretends like
these are the choices we actually have and
that you just have to because that's our
old our our solemn duty, even though technically
I would agree with that even in a
real dynamic, even though I wouldn't choose that
if I under my my point is I
don't think the idea of government and the
voting process is even important in the reality
of the way the world should be.
But if we're stuck in that, then yes,
I would agree that voting is paramount.
Now if you know if you watch the
show, you know what I'm saying. And I'm
not gonna get into my belief of the
idea of government being wrong and, you know,
the idea of I'm gonna be playing our
interview with Larkin Rose very soon, which you
guys will get the point there, which if
you haven't already, I'm making it clear in
most cases. But
that I think what we're dealing with is
the fact that there's a far very small
percentage of people that are being shown as
what we all think and do, and, ultimately,
everybody and and people in that dynamic don't
care. They don't care what Donald Trump says.
They don't care what Walls does. They don't
care what Vance does. It's it's kinda crazy
because
it's all just about winning. It's all about
your side being the one that gets the
attention, and everyone else is getting sick and
tired of it. I mean, that's genuinely what
I feel. And I think if you really
look into this, you will see the same
thing. The peep even if they're voting and
if they convince you that Trump is the
one, if you actually take a minute to
sit down and go through what they think,
they're not comfortable. They don't think they don't
like that Trump supports the injection. They don't
like that he's blindly supporting Israel. And on
the other side, the same thing. They don't
like that Kamala's blindly okay with this genocide.
They don't like that she went after people
for petty crimes and put them in prison.
It's the same kinda dynamic, but they're being
forced to pick. But there are more than
2 choices. Now it's also funny.
Didn't we just go through this with Vance
where the people on the partisan side were
going,
why, Carol? They're all just calling weird. Like,
they just can't they just follow along and
they all say the same thing. Well, guess
what? Weird how it flipped the coin. Now
we got the right saying, look at this
weirdo Waltz. Yeah. They're both weird. They're both
weirdos. They're both insider political o oligarch, you
know, elitist
who have no idea what your life is
like and probably never could even grasp what
the average person's life is like.
But just watch, weirdo waltz. I mean, how
how much one of that's gonna start trending?
I've already seen all over the Internet people
now, Waltz, such a weirdo. It's just so
funny to me. So you guys I mean,
if you wanna do it as some kind
of an ironic response, which is how they
always frame it. The partisan people are the
same. Prove me wrong.
You're just doing the same thing in reverse
and acting like you're the one being snarky
about it. It's the same damn thing. You're
both doing the same thing. It's so infuriating
to watch all of it continue to go
round and round. Now
on the point of the storm now I
just wanna make sure I pointed it out
that ultimately I mean, I'm in Tennessee. It
it did hit us. I mean, I was
even having some power stuff that got a
little hairy for a minute, just not super
crazy like it did over there, but it
touched in Tennessee for the or at least
where I was.
But what's interesting is that I I tend
to have a pretty hard and fast rule.
I don't weather is not news.
Now, the byproducts of that, yeah, if if
people are suffering, if there's I mean, but
even then, let's realize, if your story is
these people have a hard time right now
and their lives have been destroyed, yeah, that's
newsworthy,
but for one time
and I'm not trying to diminish the suffering,
but let's realize, what is the worthiness what's
the newsworthiness
of going, look at the chaos.
Look at what happened.
Well, there's not newsworthiness there. There's entertainment there,
which is pretty disgusting when you think about
And a lot of people love to just
get in, oh my god, and look at
their lives, they've been destroyed, and these people
died, and I was Yeah. No. It's right
there alone, I don't find to be newsworthy.
That's why I rarely cover this stuff. New
weather is not the news. But, the lack
of government
accountability
would be news. If you think that they
manipulated it somehow, yeah. I'm I'm with you
there. Those things I think are interesting. But
if we can prove those things, yes. I'm
all about it. So all I'm saying is
that I find it frustrating how everybody loves
to flock to these massive terror, you know,
weather stories
in all in the case of just because
it's there.
Now, like, Dane Wigginton, for example, and others
have looked into this. They do think there's
manipulation. I think that's important.
And we talked about it on a on
a recent show. But the reason I wanted
to touch on it is because overall, the
most of the coverage right now just seems
to be kind of like I don't know
what you call it. Was it is it
do
not fear porn, but like something like, you
know, disaster porn. Like, you're just like getting
in you're just enjoying watching all the chaos
and everyone's covering this. And that guys, that's
mainstream media. That's what they do. So just
keep that in mind. They're not trying to
diminish people's work. They just wanna give you
the news. But for me, if I was
gonna cover this, it would be like, here's
the devastation. Here's what happened. Right? Here's what
people are arguing. There seems to be some
anomalies here, and I'd leave it alone unless
there was something new coming around. But we're
on this, like, weak coverage for a lot
of people of just this ongoing storm, and
I think that's
problematic. But as this person writes, I don't
wanna hear another damn word about any other
country until this looks like the way it
did Wednesday. Now that, I am a 100%
in line with, which is why I wanted
to make the point. That the the old
one of the main things that stands out
to me, aside from the legitimate concern, if
you if you have evidence to back it
up, which I think there's some, just like
we covered during Harvey, that there was some
kind of manipulation there, then that's worthy of
coverage.
But or the other part would be that
if you think that they're not helping these
people
alone. Right? They're alone. That would be a
story. And I agree with that. I think
that's happening. On top of that, if you're
then recognizing
1,000,000,000, actually, 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars flying out to
wars that almost nobody in this country truly
wants to support. Now, I'm not saying you
support what they're trying to do.
Most people in this country, left or right,
do not support more money going to these
countries. That's actually the reality.
Here we are, where
they're not getting in very little help as
it were. They're even claiming they don't have
right resources or FEMA's not a pro it's
just it's crazy to me. All your tax
dollars dumping into these, they just give it
to foreign countries because guess what, guys?
They're not
there for you.
Maybe that never was. But at the very
least right now, the money going to Israel,
the trillions
overall,
is coming from your pocket because they don't
act for you. They're clearly acting in the
interest of a foreign country you pick, not
for you. So please let that sink in.
Especially from North Carolina or Tennessee, where I
argue most of them are probably leaning towards
Trump, even though he would do the same
thing. And I know you love to think
otherwise because he says things differently or he
loves to show up and go yes, but
at the end of the day, it's about
the money that is not going to help
you. It's going to a foreign country and
he would be doing just as much if
not more.
And I think you know that somewhere.
Now let's talk about first Ohio.
Now this is this one is already seemingly
dissipated. It's just it seems like a smaller
story but I wanna include it just because
it's interesting and I wanted a couple points
around it. One, just because of the larger
problem that we all pointed at during East
Palestine and nothing ever changed.
The dynamic of the actual problem, not just
the the the incident,
but the fact of the the whole process,
the the lack of safety, the the the
reduced
the regulations that was during Trump's administration. Like,
the whole bottom line is that they're shipping
day very dangerous chemicals right across your backyard
all through this country
every day.
Now, yes, I get that there is some
level of a necessity there. Well, they would
tell you that. My personal opinion is no,
there's not. We don't need these chemicals as
much as they would love to tell you
we do.
I'd I could yeah. I'm sure that there
might be commerce problems, peep businesses could go
under. Yeah. Good. Let it happen. I care
more about people surviving, not dying from cancer
when they're 45. That's what I care about.
So there are it's my point is whether
you talk about foreign policy or anything else,
there's always gonna be consequences from pulling out
of the catastrophe your government's put you in
by design, and they do it on purpose.
We can't just pull out of this country.
There'd be chaos. Well, you know what? We
shouldn't be there in the first place. We
shouldn't be allowing these we shouldn't be using
these terrifyingly dangerous chemicals that give your children
cancer and endocrine disrupting chemicals. I mean, this
is in your children's toys, it's in the
air you're breathing, and it's everywhere. Glyphosate glyphosate,
excuse me, or whatever else you wanna talk
about. We already know this. My anyway, my
point is that these these stories are important
because it's still going on.
And nothing actually changed. They just gave you
a bun in fact, Norfolk Southern, as far
as I can tell, came out ahead after
what happened there.
That makes me sick.
And I'll cover it at the end. But
so this is raw news alerts from the
24th telling you there was an emergency where
hazmat crews were called out in Whitewater, Ohio.
By the way, there's probably been, like, 4
or 5 other examples that were worthy of
notation from Ohio since then. I mean, like,
big leaks and crashes, train crash, Happens all
the time. It's shockingly common,
which shouldn't be the case.
But it says numerous emergency and hazmat crews
were currently on the scene after an immediate
evacuation order was issued following a train car
leak of a chemical called styrene.
So we're told anyway. One of the things
we should learn from East Palestine is they
will lie about everything if no one's paying
attention. They being whatever authority figure you're dealing
with. You take your pick. The point being
is that nobody this didn't get as much
attention to these Palestinians. For all we know,
there's 7 other chemicals that leaked out or
burned. Who knows? And I'm not saying I
know that. All I'm saying is that we
need to learn these things about how these
things operate, whether it's the company involved, the
town government, or the federal government that ultimately
don't want this attention of the problem.
Right? They make money off these things too.
There's contracts involved. But the bottom line is
that these things are never covered properly. East
Palestine should've proven that to us or every
other disaster before it where we find our
oh, so you didn't tell us all the
chemicals. Oh, so you didn't need to burn
it. So you knew that it was actually
treated vinyl chloride and it wasn't gonna explode
most likely according to urine experts. And you
didn't tell that to the fire department. 100%
accurate. Been saying that for a I mean,
a sense of 3 weeks after this thing
resolved. Nobody cares. We should.
But
this is a colorless flammable liquid with a
sweet odor, it says, and highly volatile. But
it does dissipate quickly as I understand it.
And so this is what you're looking at,
where it was like a leaking point. Now
the the actual problem with this was that
this thing was just sitting there.
This company was allowed to let its chemical
is is tray is trains full of dangerous
chemicals sitting in this town because they just
they were whatever they they whatever reason they
gave, who knows if it's accurate. They weren't
able they didn't have the load, they had
to wait, they'll come back later, whatever it
was. So the town got stuck with this
stuff, which I guess you could argue wouldn't
always blow up or explode or or leak.
But it did.
Right? And so the point is this kind
of dissipated.
So this is as of 24th.
And it's simply saying that the officials,
the evacuation still was in place in 24th.
Roads were closed and just warning about the
issue. Now we're gonna just jump ahead to
the oh, and the one I think I
wanna show you was, where's this one from?
Okay. Was from the actual point on the
Wikipedia page. And it just seems like this
is my point about what these all all
the things they're pumping through your towns. Where
is it? Under hazard it was highlighted. Here
it is. Now it's a regarded as a
known carcinogen, of course.
And it says especially eye contact, but it's
largely metabolized into what's called styrene oxide when
it enters your body.
Resulting, with the point was that that, styrene
oxide, which is what largely turns into when
you breathe it in, in your mouth, whatever
else, is considered toxic and mutagenic. Of course
it is. Mutagenic means that it is
a a a it's a physical or chemical
agent that permanently
changes genetic material,
Usually DNA.
I just find that to be so ridiculous
with everything else we've dealt with. You know
what I mean? So, like, I don't know.
You you could jump to all sorts of
conclusions, which we should, but recognize they're not
these are hypothetical conclusions hypothetical thoughts.
Right? Not that we should just go, that
makes sense and that's the story. I'm only
saying that because it's always okay to ask
questions as long as we're clear that we're
only considering possibilities. And one thought that jumps
to my mind is the idea of, like,
a lot of other things that were happening
around the injection,
where you've got all these
overwhelming problems that like, I know a lot
of people have been pulled away from that
story.
But, eventually, more and more, there's gonna be
more long term database studies that come out
that show you go, my god. Look at
the explosion of DNA genetic manipulation. All these
different things. So these kind of things happening,
which is a lot of them, could easily
be used to just simply add muddy the
waters. Not just one thought. Either way, it
could just have happened randomly.
My point in large point is is that
this is something seems to happen a lot
regularly,
and these are very dangerous for you. And
your governments don't seem to ever care to
do anything to change that. Now all I'm
simply saying is that we just off the
East Palestine conversation,
what is the main thing they were talking
about? The the changing of the of the
policies of these companies that allow them to
go well past the safety measures, which is
why that happened. This policy where the train
had a wheel with a problem, but they
looked at the regulations and they were allowed
to go past that and it was starting
on fire. We all heard this story.
Far as I can tell, nothing has actually
changed. A lot of big talk around these
things, some kind of feigned conversation in congress,
and then it all just went away
because nobody cared. I don't think they ever
cared to change it. That's the real point.
The lack of concern for your safety when
it comes down to their profit.
This one is from October 1st, from yesterday.
Same story. Residents impacted by Star Marine Leak
get some questions answered. So this is the
ultimate point I wanna make from this first.
It's it's a smaller event in the larger
scheme of things, but the way that they
responded with this show you that they don't
even have to pretend
to care.
Now it says, you're you're seeing
that even though the standard is a 100
parts per million,
according to the experts, the same people involved
with the companies, the same ones that tried
to cover it up in East Palestine, the
same ones that lied to you about the
way it went down with the CDC,
EPA, or how about
Florida water,
glyphosate? I mean, everything.
We just went through multiple stories showing you
that the EPA and the CDC in particular
are straight up pay paper tigers. They do
not care
from an in from a from a top
level down. There's individuals that probably think they're
trying to do right by you, but at
the end of the day and that's why
during COVID 19, we saw people resign left
and right from these groups because they what
they their illusion was shattered. Oh, so we're
not doing the job I thought I was.
I resign. Nobody cares.
The point is, so these people are the
ones setting these numbers and telling you what
it looks like, so just question it. They
got caught lying all over the place during
the last stories. 100 parts per million. It
says over the 5 sampling events, which again,
going back to the sampling we told you
from East Palestine, what they do, they took
surface level samples from the wrong type of
areas. They're called out by every independent
expert. You're taking samples that guarantee you're gonna
get the lowest number. Is that about safety?
No. So all I'm saying is we shouldn't
take these things at face value. And it
says 5 sampling events on 7 7 of,
September 24th 25th. The highest levels we saw
were 280 parts per billion. Okay. So shot
a lot lower than what would normally be
stated as what would be a risk, but
it's still present. Okay? So then my point
is just on itself, in and of itself,
there's a risk because it's present. Even if
it's the level like, the point is they
they give you like with fluoride, they give
you an arbitrary level, and we now know
that level has been dangerous your entire life.
So keep that in mind. And then on
top of that, even though if it's below
that level,
it still has a it still has an
effect on your body.
So then the question is does it continue
to accumulate and blah blah blah. But that's
I'm not worried on this story because it
seems to have dissipated.
My larger point
is about how this was not engaged with.
And it was one of the there were
the,
oh, the the the actual concentration.
People are arguing that they're already having effects
on this. No. There's always the consideration of
psychosomatic. I think that's a huge problem that
we don't ever acknowledge until we want to
see something else. Like, with COVID 19, obviously.
3 different peer reviewed studies showed you that
the long COVID was at least in part,
large part, psychosomatic.
3 peer reviewed studies, and yet people still
dismiss that. My point in saying that is
that we have to always consider that even
if it's not in the line with what
we think is happening. Then it goes on
to say Kasterman added that no dangerous levels
of stuttering were ever detected.
But some symptoms that residents shared were tasting
metal,
vomiting,
and aches. Now I don't know how in
the world and realize, these are not people
that are, like, breathing the smoke the the
fumes. These are people in their homes within
within the radius of this train track. And
they're vomiting? Oh, guys. There's no way to
me that you could argue that there wasn't
a a level that was dangerous if it
got to the point where it made you
vomit. No way.
Or tasting metal. Now if you look into
the material safety data sheets on these things,
those are not good signs. These are showing
you that it's a level that would cause
vomiting.
So right there makes me just question even
though it's now the point is this story's
on decline. It's dissipated. They've stopped it. So
the risk is over, I would argue. But,
nonetheless, what happened
could rise to the point of lasting effects.
It could.
Based on what I'm seeing here, but I
can't tell because these stories you know, it's
hard
both sides have the reasons for potential doubt.
Right? They could be saying this because they
want attention. They could be saying this because
they thought they did, Or they could be
actually feeling it. I'm leaning towards that. Just
in a general sense, but who knows? And
it says,
adding that there's not much research on oh,
this is that point. I thought it was
crazy. They should all seek medical attention if
they experience those symptoms, which again, doesn't seem
to say it's diminished. But adding that there
is not much research on human exposure to
this chemical.
So we don't have much research on human
exposure but you're good though. Those are the
kind of things that make us uncomfortable.
How would you know though if that's not
if you're okay, if you haven't you know,
see my point? It seems self serving. One
of the most common questions from the community
members were in regards to why the car
filled with dangerous chemicals was simply parked right
near their community for a week.
Many were calling for new regulations or procedures
to inform residents and the community when chemicals
are parked near their homes. Yeah. Shouldn't that
make sense? You've got an entire thing full
of, you know, tanker car full of dangerous
chemicals right next to your children who are
playing, schools, parks, water.
Yes. How in the world that's ever been
allowed is beyond me. The point is that
this is because that well, here's the point
is that's being left there.
Now there's nobody technically responsible. Now they're still
gonna be forced, I would argue, to take
accountability for it.
But there's no action. They're not moving it.
There's no drivers. It just happens. So there's
a level of lack of accountability there. Nobody
should be stuck behind, you know, having to
go to school or live behind some dangerous
chemical when we know that they clearly aren't
taking the regulation seriously or even have enough
to keep you safe. I mean, this is
not my opinion. During east Palestine, this stuff
started coming out left and right about the
fact that this happens all the time and
we don't talk about it. Central Railroad of
Indiana
said the INEOS,
the company that owned the actual tanker car,
did not have the capacity for the cars
and asked the railroad to hold them. Oh,
so you mean you did this knowing you
didn't have the capacity.
So you just took advantage of them and
said we're gonna leave it there until we
have to come back for it because we
didn't have the capacity for the cars that
we so they're maximizing their profit at the
expense of everybody else. Now you could say
they didn't know that it would explode or
leak,
but at the same time,
they're taking advantage. Now you could also ask
whether that might have been on purpose. Maybe
there's an insurance dynamic going on here. I
don't know. These are real questions that you
should always be asking. It says, but they
told residents that that will not happen anymore.
Leading from applause from the crowd. Okay.
Hollow argument until we see that it's actually
stopping. But it says, INEOS was invited to
the meeting.
They emailed them several times. This is the
the the,
ruler speaking of the government there. And they
responded.
He texts them, and they responded.
And then they didn't show up.
End of story.
Yeah. That's just like Norfolk. I mean, I
think the end of the day, they were
forced in because there was a massive, you
know, legal dynamic going on. But they just
don't even have to show up. People are
getting sick, and your chemical's around there, and
you left it there. You don't even show
up. Yeah. I don't think anything's gonna happen
either. It doesn't matter.
It says one resident asked when criminal charges
or a lawsuit will be filed against this
company, holding them responsible for the leak. No
official at the meeting had an answer,
leaving many upset.
There it is. Here's the number, by the
way, if you wanna reach out.
That to me, doesn't that alone? I mean,
even though clearly this seems to be a
lesser story, that that should bother us, guys.
That's crazy.
That's a lack of accountability.
Now Georgia,
I think is a little bit more concerning.
So if you are in what is it?
Conners? Conyers?
Georgia,
I argue that you should do some due
diligence.
And I'm, I'm blanking on his name all
of a sudden.
Shoot. I have it in here.
The the the the guy that was testing,
and he and he's Palestine.
I'll have to grab that and get it
back to you.
The point is that this guy
was going around and testing all this. Oh,
there it is. Perfect. Scott c Smith.
I had an interview with him right here.
So he's one of many. I mean, there
were there were independent testers all over the
place. But I would reach out to Scott.
He's been the he's the kind of person
that shows up at places like this to
make sure. Like he did here. We'll get
to that in a second.
So it's interesting.
That well, the point is make sure you
find somebody to make to test this stuff.
Test the water in the area. So here
here's what we're looking at, guys. This is
a massive
Look at that burn.
The colors I mean, everything about this is
is problematic.
So it says currently a shelter in place
order and evacuations are underway as a as
numerous hazmat crews and other emergency services respond
to a significant fire at the bio lab,
that's that's the name of the company, not
necessarily a biological laboratory,
which I find very strange.
It says bio lab chemical plant in Conners,
Georgia. The plant, which is part of the
swimming pool and spa water care division of
KIK
Consumer Products, is sending a massive plume of
thick black and brown toxic smoke over the
town that can be seen from miles away.
Now it's but it it it's smoking and
burning up until today.
Now it seems to be on the diminishing
side of this based on what they're saying
today, but that's up for the people of
that location to tell you because I don't
trust any of these government side of it,
the company side of it, because they are
all acting for their own interests.
That's what we should understand by now.
What's it? What's what's so right out of
the gate, what's the most concerning is this
is a
law one of the largest chem chemicals present
they're at least acknowledging, but while seemingly keeping
it under their shirt what's actually there, which
I find very terrifying, is chlorine.
Now let me show you why chlorine is
the most problematic element in this conversation around
dioxins.
Now remember, vital chloride
was the issue,
little primary issue at East Palestine.
And the reason that was the dioxin overlap
is because of the chlorine element of vinyl
chloride.
So this is what's really concerning to me.
Now this has been burning up until today.
Multiple days, and that's a long term. So
think about that. We're this is the kind
of thing you're seeing
for days. All that smoke,
all that toxic material,
all the black. They're just like with these
Palestine. The point is the black.
No. So at least Palestine side of it,
the art the idea was that it was
an uncontrolled they they still to this day,
the childish mindlessly stupid corporate media and mainstream
alternative, by the way, some of which are
the ones like Nick Sorder out there pretending
to cover the story, still call it a
controlled burn even though they're supposed to be
challenging the story. Right? No. It wasn't a
controlled burn. It was an uncontrolled burn by
definition because you can see the black smoke.
Controlled implies oxygen flow.
So if you see black smoke, that means
there is not an oxygen control, which means
that it's all particles. The particulates are flying
in the air, which is the the guaranteed
way to make the dioxins go as far
as they're possibly able to go. Now
the point
is that you see the black. That means
this is all that material and all the
toxic stuff. That's the problem. And this went
on for day look at that. For days.
Right up until right now as I understand
it. And we'll show you this clip here.
This one
is somebody from today
saying the biolab fire isn't out. Now this
was this morning.
It's still spewing gas into the atmosphere. My
son has thrown up today from exposure. He
is safely elsewhere now. It's been several days.
This is a disaster. Why hasn't it been
put out? Why is it still leaking?
You're right. The problem on top of that
is it seems that nobody's really talking about
this when it comes to the the the
mainstream
sphere.
Now
this was put out yesterday
saying
emergency situation updates.
Biolab incident alert. It says during certain times
due to weather and inversion in the in
the evening, air reading, quality readings may dip
to concerning levels. K. So here's the problem.
As far as I can tell, they're not
testing for dioxins.
Just like East Palestine,
they're testing for chlorine.
And other well, it doesn't no. It says,
I'll read it in a second, other certain
things, but it leaves it open. So I
don't know whether they're testing for that or
not. And the question is, if they are,
why aren't they telling you that? And if
they're not, then it's just it's East Palestine
all over again. Where they're going, well, the
levels aren't that bad. But you're testing for
something that's not the primary issue. Their actions
are the most dangerous chemical on the planet.
Specifically, t c p t, was it t
c c p?
Make sure I'm saying I haven't talked about
it in a minute.
It is
TCDD.
Was that right?
Trying to remember on top of my head.
Anyway, the point is that they've put the
the highest level of dachshund chemical is the
most dangerous chemical on the planet. It was
even used for chemical weapons used by the
US government to try to assassinate a foreign
leader by their own ex by their own
ambition, by the way.
So, coming to today, the point being is
that you can still see that it is
smoking across the highway
So here's where we're gonna come to on
this article.
Vancouver is awesome. It says it says chemical
smoke spewing from a Georgia factory is projected
to spread toward Atlanta as winds shift. This
is from
today.
Now it says chemicals continued spewing from the
beleaguered chemic chlorine facility. Now next we're gonna
get right into it next, the point about
why I think that's the most dangerous, but
I wanna give you all the information.
Says Rockdale County emergency officials recommended that residents
shelter in place from 7 PM to 7
AM each night.
How does that make any sense whatsoever?
Are we to believe that the chemicals in
the atmosphere are somehow less dangerous at a
certain time? I guess you could make an
argument that the temperature change or the at
the the,
humidity might somehow in effect. I don't see
why that makes sense. We're talking about a
concentration
of dioxins, which is or or chlorine. The
point is that seems arbitrary.
Randomly, you have 7 to 7, and then
you're good, apparently. But that doesn't make any
sense. Air quality readings may reach concerning levels
during those times for people in the path
of the chemical plume.
So they're they'll let people shelter in place
right near this stuff. I just don't get
how that makes sense whatsoever with anything you
understand even if it was just chlorine. Now
it says, but concerns and complaints are not
limited to the Conners area. People in Atlanta
and the surrounding suburbs have reported a strong
chemical smell and a case for miles around.
So right there, there is no way now
remember, the main point we talked about with
Palestine,
that we've now had broadly reported, is that
it went across the the
the right side of the country.
They said, I think, 4 states across, and
this is exactly what we were talking about.
Now since I'll come back to it, but
the point is that we talked about this
during our focus during East Palestine.
This is a study from the US government,
long range air transport of dioxin from North
American sources to ecologically vulnerable receptors in the
none Nunavut Arctic Canada.
This report from the year 2000,
guess what this found?
It found that women,
Inuit women, which people sometimes inaccurately call Eskimos,
but Inuit in this location,
in Arctic Canada,
where there is not I think it was
200 miles.
Well, I don't wanna try to search for
it all right now.
We went over this many times in the
past, but I'm I'm 90% sure it was
200 miles. The point is that in this
location,
in any direction, there were no sources of
dioxins anywhere.
What they traced it back to, as it
says right here, from North American sources,
was that in the United States,
from all of our horrible production, you know,
the chemicals and plastics, whatever, all the dioxins
are being produced, and they were drifting along
the air currents all the way to Arctic
Canada.
And then, in their breast milk, dioxins were
coming through to their children.
So imagine for a second if they're able
to travel that far to a dangerous level
in the breast milk of Inuit women for
their family members, for their children, with not
a single source in 200 miles, what do
you think it's doing to the people that
live next to where that's coming from? What
do you think it's doing to the people
in the state over?
This is one loca I mean, this is
the problem that nobody wants to talk about.
It's the same like glyphosate. I guarantee at
some point in the future where there's no
turning back, well, well, too late now.
But as even CNN covered this back in
the nineties, saying that they what the docs
that they were finding in fast food was
200
times the safe level, and then we just
stopped talking about it.
That's why. Either it's because they realized that
there's no turning back from this and there's
that we'll just get it and, you know,
people help somebody will be held accountable for
this terrible
I mean, I don't even know what to
call this kind of disaster. The most dangerous
chemical on the planet is so overwhelmingly saturated
this country and the world because of what
they're doing, and we just go, oops. Or
rather just go, never mind. We're not gonna
look at it.
That's what I was saying back then, but
still, seems like nobody wants to talk about
that very clear problem.
But that's the point. So when you see
a chemical smell and haze for miles around,
there's a problem there. So actually, let me
do do this first since this does make
sense for you to understand what we're talking
about. We'll come back to
this.
Burning chloride
and dioxins.
This is just a brave search.
Based on provided search results, it's clear that
burning chlorine
containing materials,
not let alone chlorine alone,
such as polyvinyl chloride or, for example, vinyl
chloride
can produce dioxins.
Very simple. Here's even
the Google search. Same thing.
Yes. Burning chlorine can produce dioxins, a group
of highly toxic industrial pollutants. But here's the
main point for me.
This is a study from 2,001.
Chlorine, combustion, and dioxins, scientific study.
Does the chlorine content of materials that are
burned affect dioxin formation?
Since every molecule of dioxin
contains 2 or more atoms of chlorine,
chlorine is an absolute
necessity for dioxin formation.
Therefore, when no chlorine is present,
no dioxins are formed.
So by the clear reverse principle here, the
reality is
the more it's present, the worse the problem
becomes.
It says, can dioxins formation be reduced by
restricting the chlorine content of materials that are
burned?
Quick answer, yes.
Let's just come to the conclusion so you
see what it says. A positive chlorine dioxide
relationship has been documented in studies of laboratory
and pilot scale combustion systems,
small scale combustion systems, and full scale combustion
systems, including some studies involving numerous waste incinerators.
So the reason this looked into is not
because of the risk of burning
chemicals in a plant, or rather, like this
kind of way, but the idea of incinerating
waste like burning plastics and which happens all
around the world, which is part of the
reason they don't want you knowing this is
a problem because then what do they do?
Right? These things are either floating
in country sized waste islands in the water,
which is a real thing. Plastics and just
like a floating plastic island out there, which
is a very real story.
Or they're burning them or shifting them to
China and they're producing
massive dioxin problems that don't dissipate. In some
cases, they never go away.
You start to get why they don't want
you knowing this is a problem? Because they
can't do anything about it as far as
I understand it.
But they could stop doing it, but can't
do that. They've stopped making money. Can't do
that. They don't care about you.
The bottom line is that they're worried about
the incinerators, but there
a thousand other ways what they're doing, or
their accidents, or whatever actually happened, are causing
massive deployments of this or releasing of this,
and they don't care.
Given the many extraneous factors affecting the study
of a of full scale waste incinerators,
these numerous studies constitute
a compelling body of evidence that dioxin formation
in waste incinerators or wherever they're being burned
or created
decreases
when chlorine input is reduced.
So exactly the point. So more chlorine would
mean an increase of the problem.
The worst kind.
Seems pretty simple to me.
So
smelling chemicals in a haze for miles around,
chlorine being the main point as you'll see
in here, then that seems to suggest a
very obvious problem.
It's about 25 miles southeast of downtown Atlanta.
They're smelling this. They're seeing haze in the
air. Winds are expected to begin shifting from
the east to the west on Wednesday,
which is you know, I'm in Tennessee. This
is concerning to me. Pushing smoke toward Atlanta
and the the Georgia Emergency Management and Homeland
Security Agency said,
quote, smoke is predicted to settle towards the
ground as it moves toward Atlanta. Yeah. That's
all that's exactly the problem. And the settling
particles
are there for I mean, the idea of
the dachshund that we're talking about,
just like we in the in regard to
the shipment of this stuff from East Palestine,
they're not even able to get rid of
it with the incinerators, which is back to
that same point.
That's why I made I'll include that since
I bring it up. This was one of
the biggest concerns for me.
The idea that this will seem and even
even Scottie Smith made a point that this
seem this is a ongoing, like, conspiracy
almost.
The clean harbors waste disposal Ohio scandal.
Clean Harbors seems to be their go to.
And they they they just give them things
that are not even capable of dealing with.
Not even just by accident, mind you, but
PFAS was a problem here as well. And
I called them. You can listen to the
phone calls.
They did not
have a way to do this. Most of
these places are bearing at the ground. So
the bottom line is even if they were
to incinerate it, the shockingly high temperatures that
many of them can't even do to maybe
get rid of it, they still have leftovers.
So now what we're talking about is that
this case, if you're just gonna let the
it's gonna settle the ground,
wherever that settles, there's a problem with dioxins.
We're and again, this is not my opinion.
Again, the only anomaly or rather unknown is
whether this the level of dioxin issue from
here, which just seems like a no brainer,
the when it's chlorine being the central problem
here.
But based on East Palestine, we already know
this now. It went multiple states. And, yes,
there are far reaching examples of people getting
sick while this was happening.
That means it's lasting. Dioxins do not go
away.
Now it says, smoke is predicted to settle.
This is there is a high likelihood that
people across metro Atlanta will wake up on
Thursday morning seeing haze and smelling chlorine.
On Thursday, that's tomorrow.
Overnight monitoring around the facility detected some exceedances
above the action level for chlorine.
So seemingly testing for chlorine. Well, if chlorine
is what's being burned,
why would we be testing for chlorine?
I mean, obviously, that's gonna be the the
lesser of what's going on. Right? The byproducts.
It's a no brainer.
To me, this has all the hallmarks of
yet again trying to just side step the
point, make you think they're doing what they're
supposed to, when in reality, they're testing, as
Scotty Smith himself pointed out, the generalized category.
As opposed to what they actually should be
looking for and they damn well know it.
So I'm concerned. I genuinely am aware of
where this is going.
Include that for you. You may you may
sure you brush up on this story of
Palestine. It is
crazy that this didn't go anywhere.
I actually wanna save that.
Now, this, this is an a smaller article,
moms for,
clean air force. Just simply highlighting this from
back on,
East Palestine, April 2023.
And they're just highlighting the same point, which
is easily there's link in there. You can
look it up for yourself, and I've basically
already covered it. Dioxins are a group of
highly toxic industrial pollutants.
They are mostly produced during processes that involve
petrochemicals,
like the manufacturing
of pesticides and plastics. They're also produced when
paper gets bleached with chlorine for everyday items
like toilet paper and tampons. Now using the
study peer review that we just talked about,
the point is they're highlighting that the chlorine
aspect seems to be the central problem.
But it says, but dioxins can also be
created when chlorine is burned,
like during waste incineration involving plastics or if
a chlorine plant goes up in flames. During
burning plastic is just never going to amount
to any good. Now here's, by the way,
a very horrible thought.
As even I think even I forget I
think I forget exactly who it was, but
the point being made was that historically, these
companies like Norfolk Southern have learned how to
minimize their own liability,
but at the same time doing so maximizes
the fallout of the people.
They do so without you seeing this. Spreading
the problem around to minimize their liability, but
maximizing
the problem on the ground.
That's usually the the inverse relay. So the
point you could maximize your own liability, ex
you know, and and and reduce how many
people suffer, but of course these companies aren't
gonna do that. They never ever do.
So the problem here
Whereas like going into toxins can also be
created when chlorine is burned.
I just lost the point I was making.
So the either with the the anyway, the
point is that dioxins
are created or the chlorine factory itself being
the problem, and that's burning.
Yeah. I was gonna make a point there.
But yeah. So, obviously, that should be a
larger problem. If we're talking about this being
something that is a problem of chlorine and
paper is being burned, if you have a
major factory with all of the other byproducts
along with just chlorine itself, this is going
to be a massive, massive dioxin release. I
don't see how there's any way around that.
Something important I was gonna say right there
and I forgot, but it says dioxins make
the news when there are contamination incidents including
East Palestine.
Many of the train cars contain vinyl chloride,
which burned in uncontrolled conditions for days, creating
dioxins and, of course, releasing the oh, that's
what it was. I'm glad I remembered.
So one of the concerns, the dark thought,
is that as in the idea of them
spreading the problem, isn't it isn't it possible
seeing how, you know, reasonably so if we
know that these Palestinians' problem went all over
the East Coast,
you contaminate the area with yet another massive
dioxin release. Well, how are you ever gonna
prove that it went back to Norfolk
Southern? Just a thought. I mean, you don't
think that's possible? You haven't been paying attention.
Not saying that's the case, though. It says
creating dioxins, of course, releasing them into the
communities surrounding the disaster site. The first of
the World Trade Center burned insul the first
fires at the World Trade Center burned insulation,
plastics, polyvinyl chloride, and electric cables burned, which
also create release dioxins.
Of course, we never talk about that. Never
ever seem to want to talk about the
actual problem, the real problem around the other
problems. Now this one is from Daily
Mail. It's, like, still highlighted here. So
it says the malfunction
caused a small fire
that was apparently contained to the roof
before
reigniting
hours later.
Okay. So the obviously, incompetence,
malfeasance, whatever you wanna call it. You know,
the idea is that this was a fire,
and if they actually cared enough to make
sure that this wouldn't become a devastating health
problem for the re the the residents, they
wouldn't I just don't think that would've happened.
But who knows what actually went down? Maybe
they couldn't have been helped. But either way,
I think that's a little bit concerning that
this could've been stopped and they were even
there to stop it and still didn't happen.
That's suspicious at the very least. Officials stated
that anyone in this radius needs to leave
the area immediately. So think about that. So
leave immediately, but at the same time, there
were shelter in place orders put out right
from the beginning.
Seems to be a bit conflicting, if you
want my honest opinion.
It says a shelter in place order has
been put in effect for residents in the
north half of the county
and homeland according to the local government.
I to me, that seems dangerous.
Like, if you really wanna talk about I
mean, the problem is they never wanna have
to order the evacuation because one, that's more
problematic. There's more cost involved. But that's my
point. It shouldn't ever be about your benefit
or loss. It should be about doing what's
right for the people. And that never is
the first concern of your government. And I
hope we can see that by now. The
residents in the area are encouraged to remain
indoors and keep windows closed to minimize exposure
to any potential hazards.
It says witnesses in the area describe the
sky filling with black smoke and ash falling
in their yards just like he's Palestine.
That is problematic.
If I were you right now and you're
there, I would be taking samples and I'd
be saving that for later and getting the
f out of town. That's my opinion. You
guys do your your make come to your
own conclusions, do your own due diligence.
Lastly, it says, this is the 2nd fire
within the past decade at that facility. That's
the same point from before.
This
these things can just happen. But with this
being a a recurring problem, when there were
when this kind of dangerous reality is probably,
like, the most dangerous thing,
It I just don't know how we allow
this to be the case.
So as individuals out there, we need to
start reflecting on whether we even need these
things. Why are we even producing these things
that are dangerous?
Yeah. I'm guarantee you're gonna get pushed back
on that idea. Well, for pools or whatever.
Or I'm sure there's other that I don't
know about necessary things for caloric, whatever you
may decide.
I genuinely think that we don't need any
of these things.
Call me whatever you want. I think we
can get away from using any of these
unnatural things and go back to things that
actually work better, that are better for the
planet. But, of course, it's all up to
you and your choice. But I think the
idea of these corporations and the government overlap
are where this becomes a very serious problem.
Says the lab experienced thermal decomposition event that
led to a fire in September of 2020.
And who knows if it just happened all
over again?
Now this is the last update. This one
is from, yesterday.
Simply saying that the chemical cloud moving around
Atlanta suburbs prompt a new shelter in place
alert.
Bio labs website says that it's in in
it it is the swimming pool and spa
water care division of
Lawrenceville, Georgia based KIK Consumer Products. Residents around
the area expressed frustration that company officials in
their public statements didn't specify what products were
being burned. How is that even possible with
what we just went through?
Because they know they can get away with
it. Because the government is not going to
hold them accountable.
We should know this by now. And you
think that Trump is any different?
Whoever's the president? I mean, Trump is a
he is all about big business. He would
do the same thing. They would lean into
what works for businessmen.
For the business operations, for the lack we
gotta make sure the trains get right back
up and running. That's what they do.
Bottom line is, if left or right, it's
the same point. Always goes the same direction.
Atlanta's fire department said it was testing for
the presence of chemicals including chlorine, hydrogen sulfide,
and carbon monoxide. Oh, wouldn't that be interesting
to tell the people there? Here are some
other things you might wanna be on the
watch out for? No. Because they don't want
you informed. They don't want this happening right
here. They're always looking out for their own
interest even while you're in danger.
The
US and the EPA has been monitoring for
chlorine and related compounds.
Well, thanks for keeping us in the know,
EPA.
They're watching out for their own butt. That's
what they're doing.
Or compromised, which I think is probably more
the case. Residents north of the interstate twenty
were ordered to evacuate on Sunday while others
were told to shelter in place. But residents
of Atlanta's densely populated eastern suburbs
can and the counties therein are also reported
seeing a haze or strong smell of chlorine.
Now at that point right there, don't you
think you should've been like, just for safety,
we should probably order at least advise you
to go somewhere else when you see a
haze of dangerous chemical smoke lingering for days?
Yeah. Just maybe.
Nobody would disagree with that.
But they're not doing that.
Quote, what's especially egregious is that the defendants
have been here before, having exposed this community
in a similar fashion over the past 20
years.
How much you wanna bet it happens again?
Now this one is from today. BioLab was
still smoldering
this morning
as a large mile long plume was still
visible. So it's still putting off toxic chemicals
as crews worked at the plant and that
caught fire days earlier, but the sun lifted
above the horizon so did the shelter in
place order. So apparently, they're claiming they have
lifted that order. Despite conflicting back and forth
orders, those living nearby have been advised to
stay inside every evening
though early morning until Friday.
So,
we'll we'll take away the shelter in place
order, but we kinda, same time, say maybe
you should stay inside until Friday? That's 2
days from now.
Does that sound like conflicting information? Because it
kind of is.
I just makes me sick. These people just
I it's like, I bet you they sit
down and they go, look, if we give
them conflicting orders, then we can act like
either one I mean, I do I don't
know. I don't wanna always assume that people
are that sinister.
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe there's a reason. But
at the end of the day, it's it's
it's at least incompetence.
How can you give them conflicting
orders to begin with? How can you let
anybody stay when you don't know what's going
on? How can you not tell them what's
actually being released? How can you not acknowledge
that dioxins are a no brainer with any
chlorinated product being burned? Because they don't want
you to know.
And I'm just so sick and tired of
how obvious this corruption is and everybody on
other side will tell you, it's okay, just
pick the other side this time. And we'll
all keep moving down the same corruption
train you know, whatever you wanna call it.
No pun intended. The bottom line is we've
been here before.
I'll include these articles for you to what
to read or watch, excuse me, the the
show.
Investigation found East Palestine, quote, control burn was
unnecessary.
That was that was found in a court
of law. Norfolk was
admitted that they were they misinformed
the local
volunteer fire chief. They told him we this
is they basically left out the fact that
his own this man's own experts,
Allan Shaw, his own experts, told him
that it was treated by Ochloride, which nobody
seems to still know, and it was one
likely to explode.
Don't you think that mattered? And then he
went on to not tell the chief that,
and they made him think it was his
decision,
But which I will tell them, arguably is,
but they kinda pressured him as even he
later said he was railroaded, no pun intended,
to make the decision to blow it up,
which exacerbated the problem for half the country.
But it got the train back up and
running. And they buried dangerous things under the
ground to get the train out of the
way, then had to dig it back up.
Guys, they they, in every possible way, made
this the worst possible disaster it could've been.
Every possible way.
And nothing happened to this person. In fact,
from what I can tell, they seem to
have gained from the whole situation.
Even though they're they lied. They omitted information
that was
paramount.
Probably because they wanted that to happen. Who
knows why? You can decide for yourself.
As well as the fact that Scott c
Smith was testing
well, I mean, how long was this afterward?
So this was what was the exact day?
I forget exactly what date it was.
Anyway, months after the fact, well after the
situation, this is July 2023.
At that point in time still, up to
14,000,
not a typo,
14,000
percent
more dioxins in East Palestine homes in their
filters compared to the control.
This guy is a very respected expert of
the world, and this is Scott c Smith.
Somebody who's
been hired, been at major disasters
hunt countless times.
Every disaster you could think of he's probably
been there. He talked about world I mean,
he's been around. He knows what he's doing.
He's a highly regarded expert. And his point
is, he's testing their filters in their homes,
comparing it to an area of control, and
it's 14,000
times the dachshunds.
We ask why they're getting sick in their
homes and have nosebleeds and guarantee
with that long term exposure that they're gonna
have some level of cancer. But you know
what? So is half the country anyway. Maybe
that's why.
Last time I checked, one in every 2
people in this country get cancer at some
point in their life. Why do you think
that is, guys?
You're staring at it. One part.
So, moving on.
I wanna talk about something else I think
is interesting.
To get into a
partisan part of the conversation.
You might have seen this story. Breaking news,
Trump promotes the purge.
Now of course I saw this and I
go, okay, well that's crazy.
Right? Look at it, I'm thinking okay, it
seems ridiculous. But you know what's actually most
incredible to me is that I thought, well,
it's probably possible that they would actually talk
about that because that seems where this stuff
is actually going. But because I'm actually nonpartisan
and I'm actually objective, I took the time
to look into it. And guess what? Just
like the stupid narrative about both good people
and all of a sudden, They I mean,
and this is actually pretty incredible.
The the way that they tried to take
him out of context in this this this
is it's it's actually pretty shocking to me.
Even for them. And what that continues to
show me
and what it makes me feel, and maybe
it's because I already sense it, but it
seems to be in every way
driving people to Donald Trump.
I mean, because look, guys, there are gonna
be people on the left just like the
people on the right that will pretend it's
the case even if they know it's not
because Trump's the bad guy. Those people are
children. They are very small minded people who
can't see past their own desires, and they
will happily lie to you for their truth.
Those are small people. I don't think that's
even remotely the majority. But the same thing
at the point is there are people that
will pretend and, you know, whatever else. But
I think most people, democrats included,
liberals included, would see these kind of things
and then go, well, that's crazy. And at
least look,
watch the clip, and go, well, that's very
stupid. He very clearly didn't say that. And
then go, well, okay. So that's crazy. So
my my perceived side is this in you
see my point? Honest people, even within the
paradigm, are gonna be driven away from this
kind of absurdity. And on top of that,
Kamal Harris is just ridiculous.
That's again, from a nonpartisan. I'm not I
think all of them are bad. That she
is just like this cartoonish figure. Trump, just
is more worrisome for me, quite frankly.
Not in the sense that one's worse than
the other. What I mean is that, ultimately,
I think they're the same thing. But right
now, the the agenda being built around them
and way people are believing that, like, some
kind of gospel level they're gonna be safe,
that does worry me.
But the point is that this is absurd.
And the title from Forbes, the purge trends
as Trump suggests,
one rally
excuse me, one really violent day could end
thefts.
Now if you read it like that, you're
going, that does kinda sound like that. Right?
And if you read it, it's like they
go out of their way to try to
leave it open, so you just kinda read
between the lines.
And I I it's I'm actually still this
blows my mind how silly this is. So
here is one of these ridiculous people that
I think even objective non partisan people can
see as, you know, again, I might find
that she's just as ridiculous as the p
like, even what Elon Musk does today is
just as dumb as what this guy is
doing right here, quite frankly. They're just partisan
players. But this Brian Krasen scene again, this
there's a whole story around this guy where
I think this is one of the ones
that, like, were some other account, like, a
some kind of fan base account that just
shifted into their media account. Like, there's so
many grifters out there. It's crazy. And it's
it's all these people in the mainstream alternative,
and it's both sides of it. And this
is what they're doing.
He goes, did Trump just effing suggest the
purge? I'm willing to bet you this is
probably where it even started. Let's what's the
date on this?
Yeah. Look. This is the 30th. So these
so called may journalist platforms look to some
moron on Twitter,
run with a story. It's just it's embarrassing.
But it says, Trump implies that his idea
for stopping crime to allow one really violent
day. That's not what he actually implied. So
let's actually watch the clip. You know, like
an objective person would do. Now look, I'm
willing to bet there are people in this
audience
who would be okay pretending that's what he
said because you think he's that bad. Now
I even if I agree with that he
is that bad, we have to be better
than the corporate media, than the mainstream alternative
media. We just need to be better than
we were yesterday, better than ourselves. Every single
day, we strive to be better than we
were yesterday. That's how we succeed in life.
And so here, when we see this,
make sure, even if you don't want it
to be true, that you care enough to
look into it and tell people, yep. You
know, he's bad, but that's not true. That's
what we all need to be doing. And
that's how that's like a a kryptonite to
where this all goes. But watch this clip,
and then we'll talk about it.
Because the liberal left won't let them do
it. The liberal left wants to destroy them,
and they wanna destroy our country. You know,
if you had one day, like, one real
rough nasty day with the drugstores as an
example
But they have to be taught. Now if
you had one really violent day, like a
guy like Mike Kelly put him in charge
congressman Kelly put him in charge for one
day.
Mike, would you say he's right here.
The whole it's a chain of events. It's
so bad.
One rough hour,
and I mean real rough.
The word will get out, and it will
end immediately.
End immediately.
Correct. You you get do you you get
what he's actually saying and you get why
they chose to try to mislead you about
this?
So what he's saying, I think, is very
clear if you listen to what he's talking
about and and don't watch the you know,
if you watch the full context, it's even
more obvious. That's why Brian and the rest
clipped this in a way to make it
seem like that. He's clearly talking about the
whatever you think of the dynamic which I
think is worthy of investigation around the, you
know, California, for example, just letting people rob
stores. I don't think it's as simple as
saying they're all just letting them rob. I
do think that's it's what's happening, but there's
more to that story. And not even the
way you might think. I don't wanna get
into it. It's it's I think it's ridiculous.
The fact that it's allowed to happen, whatever
the dynamic, is crazy to me. If I
was a store owner, I don't care what
you're discussing. I'm not letting you steal from
my store. I'm stuck to let that happen.
But, you know, working in stores growing up,
while at retail when I was, like, 16,
I remember one of the thing to tell
you, you do not you you someone tries
to take something, you don't do anything because,
you know, you don't wanna there's like a
liability problem there. Anyway, the point is that
that is a problem that we all kinda
think is ridiculous.
And part of it my other reason I
frame it that way is there is a
partisan level of kind of over framing it,
making it look crazier than it is. It's
what it's the it's the partisanship.
Both sides are crazy and ridiculous and stupid.
But the point is that what he's talking
about is that fact, that people are just
robbing stores and there's just all these videos
showing them just leave and nobody cares. Well,
we say, okay. My guy here, just put
him in charge. Let him enforce the law.
Right? So that would be a brutal hour
where they're just grabbing theft and so there'd
be, like, these mobs, they have to engage
them, it'd be brutal, people would be fighting
back, and then the word would get out
that they're enforcing the law and it would
stop. Whether that's the case or not, how
in the world you're stupid enough to frame
that is him talking about a purge
of 20 a a hour of no law
where, what, we get it out of our
systems?
That's actually what one reporter said on Twitter.
It's not what he said. And it infuriates
me that we have to be don't even
have to talk about stuff like this, but
people fall for it. People on the left
who might otherwise be, you know, good intentioned
might think that's the case, like even I
said. I actually wouldn't if I would've seen
it, it wouldn't have been as shocking as
you might think. I'd be like, that's crazy,
but it seems more like it's where it's
going. Right? Because that's how they frame either
side. So I just wanna make sure that
we actually take the time to look at
this stuff because there are a lot of
people out there trying to mislead you from
both sides, guys.
And that's an important point right here to
play. Now this is just a clip coming
from Derek's upcoming interview with David Icke, which
I think he's gonna be releasing this weekend,
I think. He's he's traveling right now. But
he had a great discussion with him. And
one of the main things he gets into
is the idea of the mainstream alternative media,
which I is exactly what we're talking about
there. We're living in this massive psychological operation
that doesn't seem to end right now because
people are playing these roles and getting you
driven further into these cartoonish sides. In fact,
what they keep telling you these sards are.
Right now, Elon seems to be turning in
the people they're following on the right into
what they said they'd become on Twitter. Now
I don't think I think most of them
are starting to see through it, but they're
all the occasional people out there that are
just kinda being pied piper right into what
they said they would be. It's the same
thing, the same trap we saw during the
January 6th conversation or, you know, different alternatives
on either side where you can see that
they're being led to be what they claimed
you were. And thank god you didn't take
the bait. Not entirely.
But my point is it's the same thing
that's happening right here. And I believe that.
Like, with the Sabac and digital IDs,
every side is having their little issues, the,
you know, the the establishment part of it,
that are trying to convince you to take
the same steps for different reasons.
Like a story like, every like, the stories
we just went over.
Those things are designed to get you to
think either
I mean, look, I could go off about
what I think, because that's just my opinion.
But you can see clearly that it wasn't
true,
it's been promoted by very influential people online.
Why? Who knows? But they are having huge
followings, and that changes people's minds.
I think that's a dangerous thing to acknowledge
or to understand, and I'm just hoping more
people can see through that and recognize this
is not an accident. They're not just one
individual out there. Some of them may be
acting of their own accord. I am absolutely
convinced there is a coordinated effort, effort, which
by the way is the reason that we
started the Independent Media Alliance,
to make sure that we can bolster ourselves
against this rising problem of others out there
trying to deceive you in very, very
influential and highly resourced ways, which, obviously, we
don't have that stuff. Right? We're not we
don't have just endless funds coming from oligarchs
and elitist pretending like you're independent.
So great clip. Make sure you keep an
eye out for this upcoming full discussion.
The alternative
media was,
unfolding, and of course, when I started out,
there was no alternative media. It didn't exist,
but I watched it form, and I was
delighted
that it that it was happening, and more
and more people were seeing it and communicating
it.
But
what I saw was a barricade suddenly being
built around it. So as as it unfolded,
people started to grasp
that we live in 1 party states.
That although you have
2 parties, sometimes 3 parties who can form
a government, if you go into the next
stage of the shadows, into the shadows,
they're they're controlled by the same hand. That
that was kind of a gimme.
And what I've seen since this MAM hijack
happened
is a regression
into left right politics. Now,
what has that
center core
of the mainstream alternative media
become?
It's become quite simply what they used to
talk about in the days of Reagan and
and that, whole period,
the Christian right.
It's become the Christian Right.
What is alternative
about the Christian Right?
And and the Christian Right has got its
hero in Trump,
and it's got all these Silicon Valley
venture capitalist,
insiders
manipulating it through funding and whatever,
to hold that line, to hold that barricade,
to because I I read a quote which
was
really, really excellent. It talks about the fact
that, and you you know, you you will
have experienced this as I have, where you
don't awaken,
you have a series of awakenings.
So when you first awaken, you go the
world's not run by the people,
that we think it's run. It's not run
by presidents or prime ministers. Okay. But if
you stop there, that's as far as it
goes. Yeah. You have another awakening, and another
awakening, and and and how you see the
world
and the scale of what's going on gets
bigger and bigger and bigger
and so what they're doing is holding that
line
they're holding that line, not least with the
the Christian right masquerading
that's what it is
as the, the alternative media. And, you know,
look at some of the the people involved.
One of the things I've learned, Derek, over
the the years is,
while this
manipulative force, let's call it that,
is,
bloody stupid, because you don't want to do
what it's doing unless you're you're an idiot.
Right?
But, you know,
you can have cleverness
without having wisdom. Right? So what we're looking
at is a force that is clever, but
not wise. Right? It's stupid.
But one of the great assets it has,
one of the great gifts it has,
is the ability
to manipulate
human perception,
thus human behavior,
and to predict
accurately
that if you provide stimulus
a, you're gonna get reaction b. Right?
So let's look at Tucker Carlson.
The black and white
way of looking at what happened to him
is,
he was going too far on Fox
with, what what was it? 6,000,000
a night or something like that, that he
was getting.
And so they sacked him. They fired him.
By which time, Musk has bought,
x, Twitter
X, and and he had a natural
transition to X. Not with 6,000,000
an eye on Fox,
but with,
sometimes, 100 of millions.
Now the idea that this cult, with its
expertise
in predicting
public reaction to stimulus,
didn't know that was gonna happen is ridiculous.
I can't tell you how ridiculous it is.
Was obvious that when he
was sacked by Fox, he was gonna become
an alternative
superstar,
and look at what
Tucker Carlson does. He focuses on right wing
politics and Christianity.
He's the Christian right. Yeah.
And and he's part of this barricade.
And then you get people like Russell Brand,
who used to be a left wing woker,
then became
a a a kind of, new age guru,
then
conspiratorial
podcaster, kind of in a flash, where did
that come from?
Then he becomes a right wing political icon,
then
he's baptized to become a Christian into the
Thames,
and in no time, another flash,
he's a Christian icon
on his knees doing
prayers with, with Tucker Carlson.
And and, you know, you you you see
this constant
theme of of the the Christian right the
Christian right masquerading as the alternative
and outside of that barricade
and the point is about the
that that within the barricade is they get
the algorithmic support,
they get the promotion, they get the funding,
etcetera, etcetera. But outside that barricade, when you
look at people like yourself, myself,
Whitney Webb,
and such like, there are genuine,
really genuine alternative,
activists,
researchers,
who don't get the algorithmic support that they
get, who don't get the funding they get,
who don't get the promotion they get. And
that's that for me is not an accident.
It's not happened organically.
It's happened because it's,
it's holding that line,
and stopping this
expansion of the awakening to greater and greater
levels,
and holding people in the myopia.
Exactly.
So look, keep an eye for that, because
he does go deep into it. He gives,
you know, big shout out to the Independent
Media Alliance, which they're, you know, they're they're
essentially we've reached out to them in the
beginning and the Ikes in general, and they're
gonna be overlapping and working with us on
others, you know, panels and so on. And
just, you know, the because
large the the nature of alternative media dynamic
is a large kind of reason for why
this is happening. So important to think about
that. And what he really is highlighting, whether
you disagree or not, consider the dynamic. Including
applied to us as well. Consider what he's
talking about and apply the logic. And recognize
that there's very clear strings to these things
that you can see. I've made these points
many times over the years. Now getting into
some other 2 party stuff I thought was
interesting.
Speaking of Elon Musk and his reference in
this recent clip,
this is just interesting to me.
So,
Amjad Masad Masad
points this out.
Greg Price says yesterday, Biden answers no. When
he asked he was asked if he deploy
more troops to the Middle East.
Today, this was on the 30th,
Pentagon announces more troops being deployed.
Okay? And he goes, somebody's running the country.
It definitely isn't Biden. Now let's be clear.
First of all, you know, this is a
clear partisan, like, 123.
Could it just be that they changed their
minds? Yeah. Could it mean that he could
it be that he was wrong? Yes.
Now look, I'm in line with the idea
that Biden, I don't think is even, like
or Trump, by the way, or anybody in
that position is actually making these larger decisions
we think they are. That's my opinion. Of
course, he would only see it applied to
Biden, not Trump because that's partisanship for you.
But the point is that it's funny just
to go, this is good. You know, he
said this, this is what happened, therefore, he
lied. And it's just very blind partisan black
and white kind of play to that. But
the the and let's not forget what Wilkerson
said. Right? This is what you would do
if you actually cared about objectivity and due
diligence that he seemed to suggest the Pentagon
came out earlier and said, look. We're not
gonna support anything on Lebanon or Iran if
you go start this yourself.
So doesn't that seem to be, like, the
opposite? Where so Biden comes out and says
that, but then Pentagon does deploy support? It
seems like it doesn't make sense. So there
seems to be more going on here than
just Biden's not in the know.
But that's also the case, by the way,
because Biden seems to be confused in all
the time. Let's let's just be clear. I'm
not suggesting the opposite of that. The point
is that this is a self serving partisan
perception. But that's all to say. The point
is that
Biden's not in control. That's kind of the
overarching point for the next case where
Umjad makes a point saying, like Jeffrey Sachs
recently said, quote, after the Kennedy assassination,
there has been no president.
There have only been facto fact factotems
of the system.
And by the way, that's where I did
have this before. I forgot to
grab my Corey Hughes interview that's specifically about
the idea of did Israel assassinate JFK, his
work, and his research. Well, in my opinion,
one of the foremost researchers on the topics,
I he's a 100% believes that. I agree.
I think the evidence is undeniable.
That being said, after Israel assassinated JFK, weird
how we've happened to have a president since
according to Jeffrey Sachs. Only fact totems of
the system.
Very interesting and related to think of it
the larger conversation we're gonna get into why
that's important.
But here's the point on this.
So that would imply that ever since then
we haven't actually been voting. We haven't actually
had any kind of political inadequate. It's been
a it's been a theater show.
Right? Or at the very least that we
have votes and whatever, but it doesn't fully
translate to the outcome.
Hey. Something like I've been saying. Right?
Well, Elon Musk goes, what the heck's going
on?
So of course, you you could so you
read into it however you want me it's
kind of a meaningless response. But at the
very least, it suggests that there might be
something to be considered here. Right? That's why
he does that. Raising it up.
Using your reach more than anybody seeming any
other world that would seem. And you're going,
look at this. What's this? Okay. So all
that is saying is that that there's something
to be considered there. Right? So that would
mean he's at least giving some level of
credence to the idea that we're not voting
the president. That we haven't had a president
since Israel or whatever he thinks happened on
JFK. Right? Okay. Well, so think about what
that might mean.
Right now, well, let's let's just take it
on the heels of this next point.
Doge Designer says, this election isn't about just
America.
It's about the future of civilization itself.
And Kamala Harris' wind could be disastrous for
civilization.
Jeez. Tell me how you really feel, Well,
this is kind of like most important lesson
of our lifetime
to another level.
I mean, come on. I I don't know.
I'm I'm like any other discussion. I could
be like, yeah. Sure. We could obviously see
how one or the other could lead you
to exacerbation of the building World War 3
dynamic, obviously.
But like I we think we are all
highlighting, both of them are blindly supporting Israel,
which is the real problem here in the
dynamic of what you're pointing to. So if
you're gonna pretend, like, you know, the point
is obviously they're both driving to the same
direction. But for sake of conversation,
the point is that all we're doing is
saying this is the most important election of
our lifetimes in a little different way. Why?
Because we're tired of hearing that same stupid
argument every 2 years. Now
if we don't do it now, we're all
gonna die, which is kind of always the
sentiment. But now they're just coming right out
and saying it. The end of civilization
if you just vote for the wrong person
in an election that's over here, we're being
told doesn't matter.
So what's funny to me
is he says this is my strong belief.
Okay. So if you're at least considering this,
which again, I'm he's not saying he agrees
with it, but he at least raised it
up. So we haven't had a president since
Kennedy was assassinated,
Which means the system doesn't work because it's
been broken or at least co opted. Right?
But then let's vote in that system because
if we don't, we're all gonna die. I
think there's a little bit of inconsistency there.
Don't you think? I think the funny point
is I don't think he actually even cares
about any of this.
It's Paul if you're he's a political figure
just like all the rest of them, driving
you to a logical outcome that they want
you in. And I I mean, come on.
How do you anyway, you get the point.
To me,
this is the logical reality
that we have been whatever whatever the reasoning,
we can prove that one side or the
other, he cheated, Russia influenced it, or, you
know, that we haven't had a president. Their
election doesn't the vote doesn't translate.
A 1,000 different ways we all agree that
we're being cheated and lied to, but it
only matters when the other side isn't responsible.
That's partisanship
rotting your brain. I think most people can
see through this right now in general.
So when we're over here going,
if we don't vote in this direction, we're
all gonna be our our entire civilization,
which I guess would mean what? That if
you vote Kamala, she's gonna end up bringing
us to world war 3? How does that
possibly even make more sense? Out of the
2 of them, Trump is more obviously supporting
of these people in the context of, like,
war and bull. Like, what she's doing is
just blind passive support for Israel. But Trump
is very
strength
peace through strength. Right? Escalation
to de escalation, exactly what Israel's putting forward.
Now to hear me clearly, I'm not saying
one is more problematic than the other. What
I'm saying is if you look at the
personas they're putting forward, obviously, Trump would be
more of the, I'm gonna strike first and
ask a question later, which is what he
did in the entire camp administration.
So the idea is that if we don't
vote for him, it's the end of civilization.
Like, are they saying because what? Communism will
destroy the world? Like, it just doesn't hold
water. What they're trying to put forward is
a lazy argument. We're all gonna die if
you don't choose what I think is most
politically advantageous for my current circumstances.
So I think that's kind of sad. And
as Tiberias says, the United States is disastrous
for humanity no matter which puppet fronts the
oligarchy.
That doesn't mean the people, mind you. It
means the government that has brought us here.
And I frankly agree with that. That's the
point is it's a uni party, not a
unity party. You could pretend that you this
is just slightly changing the game. We're patriots.
No. It's still the 2 party illusion. The
unity party. Well, that's the same damn thing
with a different name.
Stop falling for it.
Now another point about this I think is
interesting to note, which we already did by
the way. This is only just getting more
interesting. So again, this is the guy that's
saving free speech apparently while censoring people all
over the place because that certainly makes sense
and partnering with Garm in July by pretending
to fight them or being a part of
every single thing involved with the great reset
or the you know, but let's all true
because he's the good version of AI. Right?
The the good technocrat billionaire because it all
lines up. But here's what Daily Mail put
out. Danny accused of abusing 9 year old
boy and spiking drinks with horse tranquilizer as
a 120 victims come forward with shocking claims.
Just another
cease release valve of the whole Epstein network
that the government, including all these people were
I mean, everybody.
I I mean, Elon Musk or Trump or
the rest of them, Mike, these are all
people on the inside. If you think for
one second they didn't know this, you're lying
to yourself. And the bottom the bottom line
is, like, Epstein, it came out that, yeah,
everybody kinda quietly task accepted, didn't do anything
about it.
Just like now. So why we're being shown
another example? We need to recognize it only
means that the system wants you to think
something's happening.
It's all in place. You these things have
been there going back a long way.
So when he speaks up and says, how
many people in music entertainment knew about this?
Well, maybe we should realize that you did,
bud. Seeing as how he was a very
close friend of yours. As you said yourself.
I mean, that's that's what's so concerning to
me here. He says, I don't know if
you know this, but Puffin is an investor
in Twitter, which he is by the way.
He says you know, he's a good friend
of mine. We text a lot.
Well that's pretty weird. Now knowing he's been
spiking children's drinks for I mean, you of
course you might not know, I'm not gonna
assume he did. But what I want you
to think
about, as usual, is the objectivity here. Let's
just say this was Biden
or anybody who's not on the right. Do
you think they'd be like, oh, well, he
just but didn't know.
He or even an investor in a company
they own. Wouldn't you then start peeling through
the company and saying this company's problem? Yeah.
They would. Not now. No. Not now because,
well, Elon's on our side, so we're not
gonna look at that.
You know, you damn well know what I'm
talking about. And that's left and right. It's
the partisanship.
Blinding themselves to lie to the realities of
the things that are on their side because
it's inconvenient.
So as Liz Crokin points out, Elon, you
admitted Diddy is a friend of yours and
also a Twitter investor who helped you acquire
Twitter.
Is this why my account, sex trafficking survivors
and others exposing elite pedophiles, is censored on
Twitter?
That's interesting.
And there's a lot of that, by the
way. Epstein survivors, for example, being censored and
suppressed on this platform.
Guys, all of this ties back to Israel.
If you think that's not the case, you
need to pay closer attention. And also CIA,
United States, but realize this guy is completely
I mean, from the Netanyahu,
whatever you wanna call it, inviting him both
way. He's going to see him, then he
brings his personal invitee
to the I don't know, whatever you wanna
call it. His 54 standing ovations in congress
while he spout nothing but lies about rape
and murder and genocide.
They are completely in
whatever you wanna think about what that shows
you. The point is that they are suppressing
this stuff. So when he puts this out,
that's a little bit weird to me. Trying
to be like, who knew?
Yeah. I think we know who knew.
Now keeping that in mind as this goes
forward,
recognize that there is an overlap to this
stuff and how many things that tie Elon
Musk to all the problems that I call
out before they start recognizing that he is
one.
That's up for you to decide. But Jacqueline
Sweet also points something else out that I
find interesting.
Elon's pro Trump America pack has a new
website for voter registration.
After the first one raised questions of illegal
voter data collection under the guise of registering
voters. A point there's originally there's a problem
where
oops.
People were signing up,
and they the the pack was, guess what,
collecting data
through the register to vote link on the
website
only for people in that state to not
be able to vote.
Oh, so kinda sounds like a data mining
operation
under the guise of a voting dynamic.
That's interesting.
But then, of course, this it changed, updated
because people saw that. Now the new version,
it's saying the button to pledge to vote
directs to the new site, created on 9
16 but before 9 29 and with more
vague language.
We provide you with the information you need,
voting confidence, blah blah blah. Now it's saying
the new influencers are pushing the new site
specifically targeted to PA. And it says the
site has publicly accessible page that shows you
the IP information that it's collecting from you,
which isn't something you generally see.
Why does it need all this personal information?
Your IP address,
latitude, longitude, postal code.
Very interesting.
That'll let you decide for yourself. You guys
that's I think that's weird. And my point
is, seeing as how we already know, which
is every day being re proven and nobody's
seen I I still wanna know, like, why
censored man, for example? He made a big
deal about this, and I think he's probably
seen it again and I haven't called it
out. Why?
Authentics is still being used by Twitter. That's
a problem. And I'm not even suggesting anything.
I'm just hoping if you haven't seen if
put it in front of him. I think
it's possible he has just I mean, this
has been floating around, but for all I
know, what we talk about is suppressed in
front of everybody else. It's probably the case.
The point is that he was really calling
this out and is the reason that Twitter,
Elon Musk personally addressed it and said we're
gonna use Stripe, but he never did. They're
using it in other ways, but Authentix, the
Israeli
intelligence group from Unit 8200 overlapping intelligence
entities
that they use for a huge portion of
their intelligence for the government is being used
for Twitter
to to confirm your who you are. Because
that all lines up. Right? And, of course,
they're taking your biometric data. As it says
right in the terms of service, even though
Twitter doesn't need that.
With what Israel's doing in the world, doesn't
that seem a bit weird to you right
now? And they're still using it because it
hasn't been taken away. And the point on
top of that is that well, just in
realizing if they're scooping up your data for
some reason, I think that should be very
concerning to people. Now on top of that,
Elon Musk came out and just changed something
on the 30th, which I thought was interesting,
which really makes the point about how this
platform actually operates.
He says due to immediate and ex excessive
use of the bold font,
Twitter will be removing
that view from the main timeline.
Okay?
You will have to click on the post
to see it. My eyes are bleeding.
Okay?
So this guy could just be like, done.
I'm changing something because I don't like it.
Well, yeah. He's he's it's his prerogative. Right?
He can do what he wants. But I
think you have to recognize that that happens
every day.
I don't like what he's saying. I don't
like what's happening here. Let's shift it this
way because I think this or I like
that. This is Elon's sandbox,
which should be problematic for anybody that actually
likes objectivity and free speech and all the
things we pretend this is supposed to represent.
But it says Liz Crokin says, oh, thank
you holy god free speech emperor Elon Musk.
Let's all clap like seals about you fixing
the bold font issue. Now what what about
you fixing the sensor blocks on Epstein survivors?
Is that not more important than the bold
font issue?
Good point. But you wanna you know, but
clapping like seals. Of course, captured. Thank you.
Yay, Elon. You did it.
Hooray.
Which you'll see an endless procession of all
the same people going, good job.
You did it. You saved us from bold
font. And, of course, the point though is
that I still see bold font in the
stream. I just saw it today. I saw
bold font on one of these things we're
gonna talk about next,
which is an endless procession of US politicians
who were all saying, I support Israel while
they commit genocide in multiple countries. Weirdly enough,
I saw bold font today. Maybe there is
something that pushes through the new rule. I'll
let you read into that for yourself. But
either way, the bottom line
is that this seems interesting to me, coming
off the things that we're seeing. As propaganda
and co says, what happened to the voting
for decisions about Twitter? Which is what he
said would happen. Right? He said, just kidding.
Don't really care about this. The point is
that this was all a flow where Twitter
files and proven free speech and then we
censor and work with World Economic Forum, Yaccarino
and partner with GARM and I mean, every
time it happens, it's like, well, he knows
and he's on our side, so let's ignore
all the red flags.
I mean, think about everything that's happened. And
just because he says the things you want
to hear while doing the opposite, we all
do not we all, but the people trapped
in the partisan paradigm, the team sport politics,
which I don't think is the majority. But
it's kinda sad how obvious it is, and
we people just keep falling for it. And
he, guys,
represents
this, in my opinion, anyway.
Here's another video put out by your military
or the military of this country,
showing you what they're doing. We already played
that one a while back, which is super
creepy coming from the army, talking about psychological
operations while kinda pretending like they don't do
that. Here's another video. Just floating the idea
that what they do is I mean, god,
what this represents to me is what they
plant the what if this was done by
any bad guy in their mind
exactly the same way, it would be called
terrorism.
That's what they but that's what they're doing.
So I think he represents a part of
this larger agenda in the psychological operation field.
Casey Wright shared this. This is from the
Army Special Warfare Center for school, and just
dropped this about irregular warfare.
Recognize this is what we're in.
What Elon's doing on Twitter?
The manipulations around how they want you to
feel about that's all irregular warfare. It's waged
against you because you are the focus of
this government's warfare.
Yeah. Just military general.
Gotta love that.
So what's interesting, by the way, is what
we've talked to him before.
The idea that like so what they're really
saying here is that this is, you know,
normal warfare. And somebody in the chat makes
the point that there's no normal in our
like, war should be something we don't see
as normal. But the idea that irregular or
normal would be just, you know yeah. I
mean, like, even going back to, like, the
old, like, British, like, where you just line
up and fire at each other, which the
idea in that time frame was about, like,
some sense of, like,
honor.
Right? Where you're just it's, you know, you're
you're instead of trying to sneak around, like,
that's the idea. Like, that's the way they
perceive, like, the kind of revolutionary ideas that
they weren't fighting the way honorable people did.
Right? And the idea is but you can
argue that that's just not strategic. Right? You
should just stand there and get shot, especially
when you know you're don't have the same
power. Right? But this is gonna state to
state warfare. But so today, it's the same
idea where you you could argue warfare would
be just militaries going at each other, but
irregular warfare is the
around the scenes. Right? Dressing up as something
else, pretending to be false flags, psychological operations.
So that's exactly what they're highlighting, which you
could argue is just part of war today.
But the real question should be asked is
if there wasn't that like, okay. For terrorism,
for example, in the Middle East,
as I hope we're learning this today, at
least the way that we see terrorism,
that originated with Zionism.
Not to say that there wasn't people carrying
out violent acts, but the the idea of
the suicide vest, that was a Zionist tactic
that has been used.
And arguably has continued to be used by
Zionists to make it look like I mean,
this is something you need to understand academically.
Not to say that other people, Arabs included,
haven't done the same. But the point is
to realize where it began. And so the
question becomes, is that the same thing we're
dealing with here?
If these weren't the people if this wasn't
being done, it would exist in some way.
But would the state level action that we're
seeing in the world today, would the other
states be doing it as well if they
weren't doing it so pro prolifically around the
world? I would probably argue yes. That's my
opinion about how governments any government left to
the power and influence of this government here
would end up in the same way. And
and maybe I'm a pessimist, but I think
that's what government will ultimately become, which is
why I think it's the problem.
But do we still ask the question? Right?
So this again, this is the point about,
you know, Zach Adelym telling you about Israel
being the foundation or Zionism of terrorism. Is
it possible that we're seeing the same thing?
We're we're watching the US and Israel, the
British of the of the governments of the
world
using these tactics around the world and forcing
everybody else to respond in kind.
Maybe that's wrong, but it's worth considering.
Well, I mean, certainly, the Zionists have used
it and brought it, in fact, to the
area. Terrorism as we know it today, the
planting of bombs in marketplaces and so on
and so forth, was in fact introduced into
the Middle East by the Zionists in the
twenties.
But the net result of of Zionist,
terrorism and and violence in the in the
1st 3rd of 20th century has brought forth,
to my mind, the the anomaly, the
horrific
and unacceptable status in the Middle East today
of the state of Israel, which is in
fact an armed garrison state,
which now exports more arms and distributes violence
all around the world,
vastly disproportionate to its size. I mean, in
that respect, I think it's a it's it's
a horrible cycle of of violence. But in
it all, I think the Palestinian is the
victim. There's no question about that.
It's important to know. It really is. The
reality of that. Now hit let let's get
into
this was there's a couple of points around,
like, the regular warfare mindset that I wanted
to make. And now this one was specifically
about something I've already mentioned.
I mean, it's actually something that I kind
of jokingly make fun of all the time.
As the these these these news points out,
during the VP debate,
if you waste your time on that,
the moderator
prefaced her first question
about Israel and Iran by saying that president
Biden has deployed more than 40,000 US military
personnel
and access to that region over the past
year, which is crazy in of itself,
to try to prevent a regional war.
Okay.
How does she know that?
Right? So is that what Biden said? Right.
Okay. So but do do you know this
and this is what ultimately Sam Husseini has
highlighted as called media mind reading.
Obviously, the point is, he's deployed these people.
That's what a news reporter would do. Not
that he for this reason, you don't know
what his mindset is. They lie all the
time. So to report facts, that's what you
would do. But when you insert what you
say their intention is, and then, of course,
you slant that one way or the other
based on who you like and don't like.
Right?
His his design is to prevent war. Iran
doing the same thing is to escalate.
Right? Their intention is to cause chaos and
spread terror.
Well, you're just adding your own interpretation of
the same act on either side. That's what
we talk about every day. Right now, you
see that no more prominent than in the
mainstream alternative media right now, screening about these
things where they ever they want this and
Kamala wants that and Trump's going to do
this. You guys don't know what you're talking
about. You're you're simply parroting what the other
side of the paradigm, like, the what the
game is within the lie.
Trump's a fascist. She's a communist. No. You're
all being played.
But I find this a very important point
in all this.
It says it's as he that says it's
chronic problem in the media. The beliefs, motivations,
and intentions of certain preferred sources, usually the
US government, are described as matter of factly
by the press, as the reporters have the
ability to read their minds. That's what Sam
wrote in 2004.
Very important to think about. We see this
every single day. And we're gonna show you
some of these
presentations in a minute coming from Matt Miller
and the rest. But on a couple points
on foreign policy,
we just talked about this. GlobalEye news reports
on the 30th. An assassination attempt
on Ebrahim Tarore,
president of Burkina Faso, what has failed.
We just tweeted this out, I think, 2
days before this, regime change watch. Now as
we were just saying, hashtag regime change watch,
because this is happening. Right now it's building.
I think there's what? Mali I mean, there's
at least 5 or 6
countries in Africa that I think are on,
like, on the prepice precipice of some kind
of regime change effort from the US government
and Israel in particular.
And there's reasons for that. Most of these
countries have pulled their ambassadors from Israel. They're
speaking up about what's going on there, and
they're pulling back from the US dollar. Every
one of these are deal breakers for the
US imperialism.
Now on top of that, this is from
Sprinter, intay the intelligence services of NATO countries
and Ukraine.
He's reporting anyway. Or or rather, the Russian
intelligence forces are reporting, so take it with
a grain of salt. But I should point
out that every other time they've made this
claim in the past,
it's come to pass.
As objective reporter, I can tell you that
because I'm not gonna lie to you based
on partisanship or the US government versus Russia.
The fact is they've said this in the
case about Syria,
and it happened. They said this about Ukraine,
and it happened. And I'm talking about not
that that the event happened that I just
chose to believe what they said. The facts
proved that this in a 1000 cases, is
Syria is the best example?
Because they did tell you they're gonna carry
out a false flag attack. And then eventually,
even somebody like Robert Fisk from the independent
went there on the ground and said, yep.
That's what happened. And they still lie about
it. That doesn't mean that they're not they
could be lying now. That's just being objective.
But realizing that they have a track record
of telling you this is coming, and it
does.
And the point is, they're telling you that
the NATO countries and Ukraine are preparing a
provocation
to use chemical weapons in Syria. You know
why this makes sense more than ever? Because
Israel is
shockingly desperate for anything to take the attention
away from what they're doing.
This would and realize Syria is one part
of what they're doing. So on top so
it all it actually folds into larger agenda.
Syria is part of the greater Israel project.
They've been going after Syria for a long
time, both for that. Assad's support for Hezbollah,
which by the way is a group that
I think frankly most people in the world
can understand why they support them at this
point because it's a resistance group toward the
illegal occupation and an authoritarianism
and imperialism
of these people. That does not translate to
good guy. It just simply means you understand
why they do have the mass support that
they provably do in these areas and most
of the world, mind you.
Calling the terrorism is just a clumsy thing
that the US government does against anybody they
wanna dehumanize and want you to think is
bad guy.
You know how many people they've called terrorists
around the world? People that have later turned
out to be the exact opposite are people
that they say are their allies who are
the real of the world or in fact
become that?
Saddam Hussein or Osama Bin Laden who were
allies of the US until they suddenly weren't?
Right? It's just crazy how obvious this history
is. But
the point,
the goal, he says, is to launch a
campaign to discredit Damascus and Moscow in the
UN and the OPCW, of course, which I
don't know why they even have any standing
in the world anymore. In order to achieve
this, it is per it is proposed
to involve the nongovernmental organization, the White Helmets,
yet again, as Vanessa Beale's covered for the
longest time. That's what they do. They're not
really the civil organization they pretend to be.
They stole the name from a group that
actually existed, and it's a US group put
on by a UK entity. We've covered all
of this. They are simply a propaganda
site, you know, entity from the,
I guess, even from a NATO perspective. But
really, you can see the US, UK influence
on this. I mean, their names are written
in English in the back of their shirts.
It's just so stupid.
Using the white helmets yet again, says whose
activists will be engaged in video recording the
consequences of the incident? As usual, carrying it
out then filming it like they've done already
many times. The plan of the operation envisions,
envisions
that the militants will drop a mined container
containing chlorine from an unmanned vehicle
during an attack. Chlorine, interesting overlap. On top
of the fact that they've already done this
in the past.
The already the conversation, I there's just so
much propaganda around this discussion. It's it hopefully,
you're all very versed on the lies around
Syria.
I mean, it even says on positions in
in the de escalation zone of Idlib. Right?
Idlib. I mean, these these Brett McGurk himself
told you it was a hotbed we've never
I haven't seen in centuries of of ISIS
and Al Qaeda.
The group the area which they're working through,
which is where the groups they're working with
are positioned.
And yet we just pretend we can't connect
those dots.
They are working with the obvious. Like, so
if we wanna pretend that Iran is a
state sponsored fair
the only reason they make that claim is
because they work with the groups they call
terrorists. If you objectively stand back, if anybody
anybody in the world that doesn't blindly take
sides and look at what we know are
the best examples of terrorism on the planet,
ISIS, Al Qaeda, moderate rebels, all the people
that they're actually funding.
They haven't been fighting them as much as
they pretend they are, and they're literally in
countless examples working alongside them. Locations in Yemen
that I talk about all the time embedded
within the Syria Syria Saudi Arabian controlled territory,
Or you Israel giving them treatment in Golan
Heights. Or the fact they've shipped them back
and forth helicopter wise to multiple locations they
use them. Or moving their families around. Or
just a simple, provable reality that they were
a proxy element created by Israel and the
United States. That's not up for debate.
But, yeah, let's forget all of that and
pretend like they're fighting terrorism because US government
says. So when you realize the the Russia
all that being said, Russia could still lie
about this. So consider that they might be
building something, and it would make a lot
of sense with where this goes, but remain
objective, question everything, and we'll see how this
goes forward.
Glenn Greenwald
makes a larger point about China, which I
thought was interesting. Alright. So right now, there's
a lot shifting in the world.
In no way do I see China as
some kind of a better replacement or even
any different to the US government, quite frankly.
They're shockingly alarming to me in a lot
of ways that the US is budding towards.
And in other ways are different in a
lesser degree than what the US is, but
they're both, in my opinion, the same kind
of thing.
But nonetheless,
again,
truly being objective and standing back,
the US government's been carrying out wars of
aggression and occupation and theft and terrible things
for its entire existence for the most part.
It's not up for debate. So is the
UK.
China, on the other hand, has been
not carrying out wars like we can see
here. That does not mean good versus bad.
There are plenty of things we can get
into around what China does. I mean, just
with its own population, with the idea of
the social credit and technocracy
in that direction, that very worries me. But
overall,
what he's pointing out is that he's at
least claiming,
even if you don't agree with this, and
I'm not even saying I do, but you
can see how the people in the world
might start coming to this point. Ask yourself
as an American why this should matter to
you. The way that frame sounds weird, but
realize why this should matter to you. Whether
or not you agree with it.
This person says in regard to what,
secretary of defense Lloyd's point speaking is, I
spoke twice with Israeli prime minister Gallant yesterday
about the events in Lebanon. I expressed my
full support for the right to defend itself.
Like, gosh. Just it makes me you almost
wanna throw up in your mouth when you
hear that. And they keep doubling down.
Defending yourself?
Against what exactly? The occupation of Lebanon? There's
no hostage in this dynamic. What are they
actually doing? Just murdering civilian buildings and you
just go, defense.
Like, you guys have lost the plot. You've
lost everything, in fact, but that's where we
are. But he's saying he's determined to prevent
Iran and Iranian backed partners from proxies for
exploiting the situation.
So based on the flimsy allegation that Iran's
backing the group that everyone in Lebanon supports
is somehow the justification to just blow everybody
up to prevent what you claim might happen?
I mean, how does anybody give these people
any credence? It blows my mind. And it
says, I made it clear the United States
remains postured to protect US North blah blah
blah.
Glenn says, the US spent 3 years sanctimoniously
preaching the sanctity of sovereignty, you know, while
illegally occupying multiple countries. We should laugh about
that. And evils of invasions,
he says, often from those who invaded Iraq.
Now the US defends Israel's invasion of Lebanon,
realized while still pretending Russia did everything wrong,
which is crazy to me how objectively hypocritical
these people are.
He says, in case you wonder why most
of the world sees the US with zero
credibility
and migrates to China.
This person says,
China and technically, Glenn didn't even say feels
that it has more credibility, but people are
doing that. Right? That's the point to make.
And he says, China has more credibility than
the US? Daniel asks.
And he says, probably has something to do
with the fact that China hasn't fought a
war since 1979.
Now, of course, from, let's say, republican perspective,
it'd be a secret subside you know, underneath
war. Then maybe you're right.
But even that does not pay it pales
in comparison to the overt war of aggression
we call the war on terrorism that is
simply war of terror to the people around
the world, and including Americans. Or the COVID
19 war on you, or any number of
things that they've supported with Israel's genocides throughout
the world. But but
China, because the secret narrative we think is
happening, which maybe it is, but doesn't even
compare. You see how that doesn't make much
sense?
And, again, to try to pretend that means
I think China good is not the reality.
The fact that I always have to say
that is just battling against the partisan misrepresentation.
But it says, while the US has invaded,
bombed, occupied, and imposed coups in countless countries
in that time. I didn't even mention the
coups.
But removing yourself from western propaganda is helpful
to see how the world perceives the US.
So that's the point. Not that I think
that this is but simply how the world
perceives this.
It's out there if you're suddenly on the
side that you think that this the US
and and Trump represent this glowing democracy beacon
for the world.
Ask yourself if it makes a difference if
the rest of the world
has that perception.
Even if you think you're right, even if
they are wrong,
it should matter that the word there's a
reason that they see it that way.
And if you can't acknowledge that the US
government has been marching around the world and
destabilizing, destroying, raping, and pillaging,
And you just aren't being honest with yourself.
We could change it. We should. We want
I want to. I don't think Trump or
Kamal represent anything in that regard. But it's
important to think about how this is shifting.
And if the only argument is that you
think it's some surreptitious plan by the other
countries to steal, and maybe there's a part
of it there, but you that is stopping.
You're refusing to acknowledge the problems that are
ours, or specifically the governments that take our
name.
But as always, you can't actually solve a
problem until you acknowledge you have one. To
just blame Russia and China, even though they
are playing a part in the way these
things may go, is choosing to hide from
the problem.
Which is your government.
In other cases, ignorance, the root of all
the stem of evil points out, a clip
from
I think this was ultimately, the Duran. But
it says European corporations have bought more land
in Western Ukraine, Nick Wallace speaking, than the
Russians have taken.
Right? So all those people screaming about Russia's
gonna march around the world. These European corporations,
and I would argue US as well, have
taken just to to be clear about his
point, European corporations have bought more land
during the ongoing war that the US and
everybody else is maintaining
than they than Russia has taken.
And yet what all they could talk about
is, Russia's gonna take everything. No. You're taking
everything. You're using this to steal from Ukrainians
while acting like they're the bad guy. It's
just so shocking how obvious it is that
in this dynamic, what they're in doing, they
they are the representation. They are exploiting the
people of Ukraine while putting them in a
position to suffer.
Now even if you think Russia is in
its own ways taking advantage, you have to
objectively argue that what the that side's doing
is worse objectively.
Because you're making this happen and you're stealing
from them while it's happening and keeping it
going while you're stealing from them. And objectively,
Russia has not done what they all scream
is happening. Maybe he will tomorrow.
I wouldn't be surprised.
But there's no indication they're gonna do that.
You know who is showing you the indication
of continuing to take other places over?
Israel.
The United States. Pretty much everybody the US
leans into.
Funny how that works.
Now Wyatt Reed, another foreign policy point, says
the state department says it's absolutely false that
anything to do with a recent regime change
in Bangladesh.
Over and over and over, they're doing this.
But leaked docs show that they were explicitly
apprised of an effort to, quote, destabilize Bangladesh
Bangladesh politics
by a CIA cutout.
Here's a great article highlighting, yet again, another
US regime change that we just ignore.
It's constant, guys. And more now than ever
because I think Israel's driving this to extreme
level.
Desperately trying to move pieces around the board
in hopes they could somehow dig out of
this hole they created.
But you this this
disgusting human being sitting here acting like he's
watch
screaming for peace and freedom as they literally
steal from everybody.
Everybody. You, their neighbors, their allies,
everybody.
Well, I wonder why, when they're working with
an ally like Israel, seems to run downhill.
Lastly,
this is pretty hilarious, mind you. Uh-oh shared
this. Vavon and Lexus, these I've seen we've
seen them before, those these, pranksters.
I think they're Ukrainian. Right? Or Russian. I
forget. But the bottom line is they do
these where they call politicians.
I don't know how they keep doing this.
They literally got Mike Pompeo.
Very interesting to hear his claims while knowing
his previously held position of power. He He
claims all sorts of weird things about Ukraine.
Who knows if he could take it at
face value? But here's what's funny.
I said it's incredible to me how easy
it is to fool these clowns.
Maybe why Israel had such success infiltrating US
politics despite being shockingly incompetent when it comes
to propaganda.
They make decisions, these people, like Mike Pompeo.
Not in the moment, but in most and
still in some cases though. They make decisions
that can change your life,
and yet they're falling for phishing scams and
pranks. Let's not forget the argument from,
what's his name? Clinton and,
what's the weirdo guy's name? Podesta.
That's how apparently, how that happened. Some phishing
it's a literal phishing scam. Like like your
your grandparents would fall for. These guys are
high level inform I mean, it's just mind
blowing. It shows you that these people aren't
actually as smart or influential as they it's
it's like the idea of fiat money.
It has value because we give it value.
And the funny thing here is that this
guy literally gets I don't waste too much
time on it, but you watch it. It's
hilarious.
And it's just embarrassing.
Are they not doing their due diligence? You're
gonna just jump on a call and talk
to some random people? Like, it just blows
my mind.
I think this will come back to this.
This is a point about where this
they're stand with us or against them. It's
it's already popping up in the Lebanon conversation.
We'll come back to it. But let's start
with some points on Gaza. So fake news
and foreign policy.
Because we have to realize
this is still happening.
And it's sad because
even now this has lost attention because people
are focusing on the current thing.
The reality is as they're continuing to
murder people in Mel Lebanon, they're also continuing
to murder, rape, starve, and pillage in Gaza.
Still happening.
Muhammad Shehada points out with all eyes on
on Iranian missiles, which we'll get into, Israeli
soldiers executed and maimed at point blank dozens
of Gazan children and civilians who simply tried
to go back to their homes in northern
Gaza.
Right? So you that that's what we're telling
you. They've they're they've now taken it. It's
gone.
They created that halfway measure.
Now children trying to go back to their
homes being shot.
They don't care whether they're terrorists or not.
They see them all as terrorists. That's the
point. That's how they view this. They've said
it themselves.
This is as of yesterday,
still happening.
The cradle of force is rarely strikes in
Gaza, mind you. Homes, tents,
schools,
killing children in Gaza. Dozens.
Imagine doing that simultaneously,
carrying out a massive war and aggression on
a Lebanese civilian location
as we'll get into while they're bombing military
military targets even according to Israel.
Israel, including having, as far as I could
tell, at least before I started, 0 actual
casualties.
They're bombing children's schools, homes, tents in Gaza.
And in fact, bomb them again after they
got embarrassed by what happened because that's who
they are.
Can't take it out on Iran, so we're
gonna just kill a bunch of children in
Gaza. That's what I'll teach them.
Why do you think they resist?
Because you don't care
speaking to people who don't.
There are a lot of people out there
who see these things and look the other
way. The governments is who I'm really talking
about, who just don't care. So what do
you think they're gonna do?
You expect them to just sit back and
hope you the the law saves them? I
mean, come on. Like, genuinely think about what
it takes to be in that position.
They're gonna fight back. And then when they
fight back, even through the law, even through
legal channel, they still get called terrorists.
It's been going on for 75 years. 76.
Rami Abdul from human EuroMed Human Rights Group
says the 7th,
number 7, the 7th massacre committed by Israel
and Gaza as retaliation for the Iranian strikes.
So since Iran responded, which was what, yesterday,
7 massacres. Moments ago, Israel bombed Muscat School,
killing dozens of civilians and targeted a home
next to the Al Amal Orphanage.
They're not even covering this stuff because, again,
we're looking over here. They're just executing people.
In broad daylight bombing school, they're not even
giving you a narrative anymore because they know
they're not gonna be held accountable.
Now let's prove them wrong.
Let's make that the case that they're gonna
be held accountable. Screw what your government thinks,
their influence.
We can make that happen. Because what we're
watching is one of the most grotesque things,
if not the worst thing I've ever had
to cover.
It's not even just the graphic nature of
it. It's the ongoing day after day. Now
we've shifted into a new location.
A year nonstop of just murdering innocent people.
And now we're just going, let's just kick
it into Lebanon because the US government is
so cowardly and meek and feckless that they
go, well, we'll get away
with it. Seems to be what's happening. Hopefully,
left or right, you see that enough to
care.
7th massacre
in Gaza. Not even getting into Lebanon yet.
Here's a really disgusting graphic that came from
the United Nations.
Children killed in conflicts. Now we've seen different
levels of this, the the bombing locations, Dresden
and the UK compared to like, it's just
every possible metric. Israel has shown to be
so far above any location, combined locations in
amount of children killed, bombs used, you know,
per capita location, seismic, everything. And yet they
still have the nerve to come out and
say precision
and most moral. And what was the other
one about the more than more targeted than
any military in history or whatever these really
stupid claims are. And as I've always said,
they could just come out and say, no.
No. We're not targeting them.
As opposed to just going out and saying,
more targeted than or more precise than any
or the whatever the point would be. Instead
of saying,
we're we're just not bombing civilians, they come
out and say more targeted than ever in
history of any planet in the existence of
every universe in the world. Sort of like
Trump does.
Why did that take you that far? Because
they're children. Because I think they're actually insecure.
At the end of the day, you could
just play it safe. No, you gotta make
it. We didn't kill any showmen at all.
As opposed to just going we didn't kill
as many as you said. You see? We're
not starving them. We have more food there
than they've ever had in their lifetimes. That's
what Leo Levy has said more than once.
Paraphrasing.
Well, here's a clip or a a graphic
that's showing you that 12,300, and that number
is way,
way higher than that when you understand how
many are buried, how many have died that
we don't know about, how many are lost,
how many have been kidnapped by Israel. All
of those are real things according to even
the UN.
October 2023 to February 2024.
There were 12,300.
The world
the world, 2019
all the way to 2022 combined.
Children killed in all conflicts from all that
time frame, 12,193.
So Israel has killed more children in a
small
focus of their warfare
in this tiny period of time compared to
other wars that go on for years,
compared to every other war since 2019.
But yeah. Tar most
targeted.
Most moral.
I mean, it really it genuinely gives me
a physical response to see people make these
claims. The ones out there acting like the
most moral.
And then when you see this
plastic human being
responding in ways that really make it's same
thing.
There's a perfect pause. I mean, guys, these
these people are terrifying to me. Not because
I'm scared of them, but because they exist.
The fact that we you have to live
in a world of people that are this
cruel,
sociopathic,
psychopathic,
sinister.
The kind of person that would not, like
I said, not just be capable of doing
this, but capable of hiding it. And on
top of that, capable of saying it's a
good thing.
That children who starved today, it's good. It's
fighting for freedom. So go back to sleep
and pretend you're voting for somebody tomorrow.
These are monsters, guys. The monsters of our
time.
And what they're gonna do here should make
you laugh and cry at the same time.
So we've been talking about the ceasefire, the
the the hostages, the idea of aid. Right?
This is about the ceasefire overlaps with a
point.
Matt Miller, I I don't know whether he
just lost his footing and made a mistake.
He genuinely makes an argument
that we never wanted to deal with Hamas.
Actually, I'll just read what I said here.
I said it's perfectly clear.
They wanted a cease fire, but not with
Hamas, he says. You know, despite saying that
countless times on the record. That's really dumb
in and of itself. But
it's also, at the same time, Hamas' fault
that the ceasefire they didn't want with Hamas
never happened. You know why? Because Hamas won't
come to the table,
despite doing so countless times, which is the
obvious reality.
I mean, makes sense. Right?
So it's their fault we don't have a
ceasefire
because they wouldn't come to the table. But
we never wanted it with them, and if
they did, we wouldn't accept it.
I mean, it's embarrassing that anybody pretends like
this even lines up. Even the people in
the room, back at what he says. What
he's exposing here is that this was designed
to fail, which brings you into the point
of how we know that they used this
fake process
to assassinate Nasrallah,
to trick people into
positions of insecure or of of comp
thinking that they're not at risk,
only to use diplomacy to wage war because
that's what terrorists do.
Diplomatic resolution. But was that the case with
the Rafa first? It's not just in Rafa,
but We've never wanted hold on. We've never
wanted to see a diplomatic resolution with Hamas.
Well, okay. Well, oil what about the ceasefire?
We wanted to Okay. So the reason he
looks so confused
is because everybody everywhere knows that's involving Hamas.
Okay? So Cutter
and everybody else involved
have only been dealing with Israel and Hamas.
That's it. We all know that.
I mean, think about how dumb it is
for him to say that right now, seeing
as how you've had Blinken and Matt Miller
more than once say it's up to Hamas.
Right?
I mean, for crying out loud, I could
probably find one of those right now.
Let's see.
I
mean, it's just so stupid. Like, hey. Check
this out.
Just randomly searched.
According to various sources, including official statements and
reviews, US secretary Blinken has repeatedly emphasized that
the responsibility
for agreeing to a cease fire
lies with Hamas.
Okay. So you never wanted a deal with
Hamas, but you've been waiting for them to
accept a deal you never wanted with them
and weren't gonna like, his point is not
to say that we didn't want to, but
we grudgingly had to. He's saying that that's
never been the case. You know why? Because
Netanyahu
is saying that now.
Remember, their whole point is we there's no
diplomatic resolution where Hamas is still around at
the end of it. And yet they still
pretend like we're gonna get into an agreement
with Hamas at the table.
That's been happening for months. For all hap
I mean, what? For 7, 6 months?
Over and over and over. Since the very
first week,
Hamas was offering a full exchange. They denied
it.
It's just so embarrassing. Look, here's plenty of
articles. Blinken says Israel accepted. Urges Hamas to
do the same.
I just don't know why normal people that
wanna pretend that these people, whether left or
right, what they're doing exposes everything. How can
he possibly pretend at a time now when
everybody, including Israelis, want this to be resolved
that they never wanted this despite him saying
that countless times?
That's just embarrassing.
With Hamas.
Well okay. Well, oil what about the ceasefire?
We wanted to see a ceasefire, but we
have always Not a lot of people. We
have always been committed to, the destruction of
Hamas. And I wish So they come to
the table so you can have a conversation
about a ceasefire.
But you have only one party at the
table who's capable of doing that if Hamas
wasn't ever on the table.
I mean, do I I mean, do I
even do I even need to explain this
anymore? Like, I feel like some people can't
grasp how dumb this is. He is explicitly
proving to you that they never wanted this.
You can't have a ceasefire with one side
involved.
There was nobody else there. Hamas was the
representative for the Palestinian side. And let's just
even say you think that that was Haman.
Israel comes and goes, no. We can't deal
with them. Okay. Then why did it continue
to be Hamas
for 7 months, 8 months? Because they they
wanted it to look like something was happening.
And then Netanyahu at the end would go,
well, we're not gonna do it because Hamas.
And they would go, well, it's up to
Hamas. But he just said he was never
gonna allow Hamas. You can't be in a
position where Hamas is left at the end.
And then they would do it again. Go
back to the table, Hamas was there. They
have a conversation. And they go, well, it's
up to Hamas. And then then you're going,
well, I'm not gonna deal with Hamas. They
go, well, there you go. And and they
act like we're the ones being stupid about
this.
It is painful.
And the crazy thing is there are people
out there that know that and just don't
care.
To,
the destruction of Hamas. And I wish
that Hamas would come to the table
and work with us on a ceasefire as
you Despite doing so, I mean, a 100
times.
As even they have talked about. I mean,
you would not have had the progress if
they weren't coming to the table. What they
were doing was agreeing and then Israel would
add new problems and they would and they
we already agreed. And they would go, they're
not coming to the table, but why would
they need to come to the table, Matt,
if you never were going to deal with
them?
Kinda seems like a logical
in a logical conclusion or rather a inconsistent
point.
So as you heard me saying earlier, Hamas
has been absent for weeks. Won't even respond
to the mediators putting forward
ideas asking whether they would agree to a
ceasefire or not. How does that even make
sense? Why would they how could they agree
to a ceasefire if you'd never were going
to make an agreement with them? Like, it's
just self it's contradictory in and of itself.
Like, I know I'm over harping. I you
probably already get it. But it's in a
way, it's almost entertaining to see how dumb
this is. And I'm hoping that there's some
I think there are some people that have
yet to really wrap their mind around what's
going on and how what he's saying does
not line up with the end game. And
that shows you that they are so desperate.
They can't even hide this.
Why I mean, there's any number of other
ways you could have tried to cobble this
together.
Look. You can talk about Israel and the
culpability that has, that Israel has and the
tough decisions that Israel needs to make. And
it's absolutely true that Israel needs to make
tough decisions to get to a cease fire.
But the way out of this conflict is
a cease fire, and it is Hamas
that's missing an action right now that won't
Yes. But so he ends by saying it's
Hamas that needs to come to the table
to agree to a ceasefire that will never
allow because Hamas is gonna be a part
of it.
I mean, I mean, someone needs to make
like, that needs to be done in some
way. Like, I can't even do it justice.
It's just the funniest, stupidest thing. And you
know what's sad about it? Is that we're
dealing with human lives here. While they're playing
this little tap dance y clown show, people
are being murdered. They know that because they're
giving them weapons and the money to do
it.
So it's really disgusting. It really truly is
unnerving that we can be in this position
where they're playing this game while they know
what they're doing. That's my point, guys. These
are villains.
Villains.
Now
what normally happens in this game, because it's
so obvious, is that people get called out
for blatant misrepresentations
and they just block you. But I wanted
to highlight that that I've got a pretty
great track record so far. I mean, I
think almost all of them blocked me so
far. They Eli David. I mean, I I
can't
Hen Mazig and all these ridiculous Zionist propagandists.
Well, I just got another one from, what's
her name, Flor Hassan, this absurd person who
was lying on in with Iain Mate. And
I simply pointed out, in case you've missed
it, this ignorant woman who's smugly dismissing easily
verifiable facts about Israel's genocide, don't forget she's
the one that very embarrassingly got caught by
LBC
lying about hospitals in Gaza. And then when
she got confronted about it, she goes, well,
no. They they they used to be, but
not anymore because they they removed them. And
she goes, no. They're there. And I just
talked to them. He goes, well, I don't
know. Let's talk about something else. Like, just
knowingly
trying to lie to lean into Israeli narratives
because that's what they do. It's pretty sad.
But so when I called her out for
it, she blocked me. Because what do you
do? Right? You know you're lying. You know
that we can see you're lying. And we
know there's no argument against it because so
flimsy, so you just block in hopes that
you can reach somebody else. Same point here,
which I think is interesting because even according
to you, Twitter rules,
this is a representative of the government.
Now I think that I don't know if
it applies I think it applies to only
their official account, but I don't think she
has an official account. But she is a
spokesperson for Israel. I simply pointed out that
she's wrong. She lied. She actually said the
Gaza famine hoax as Elon Levy did.
I mean, in every other context, Twitter and
YouTube would be like, you can't shout. Like,
if we came out and said the holocaust
hoax, which I don't agree with. But I'm
saying, if I said that, you can't well
know you get censored. But you're not allowed
to say or you're allowed to say that
the entire famine, which every institution in the
world that has any standing in that field
has said is a famine, you're allowed to
say it doesn't exist. That it's a hoax.
That children aren't starving to death as I'm
speaking. Yeah. These are monsters
because they know it's happening. Because they're making
it happen, and then they go, you're lying.
They wonder the children fine. And I simply
pointed out, well, according to the IC
the IPC, imminent.
Famine is imminent for half the population.
And this person said this is her, by
the way. There's absolutely no famine in Gaza.
What is what there is is Hamas stealing
and blah blah blah. The same old tired
narratives. She even references that Elon Levy lie
about cutting off hands,
which was already proven to be a lie
by the fame same Zaka liars from the
very beginning. And I said, oh, except for
the pesky little fact that literally everyone in
the conversation has called out Israel for what
it's doing, and Israel's been caught lying by
its own media about every aspect of this
genocide, even killing its own people.
And I gave the article that has been
used even by even Blinken has been reprimanded
for it. Israel deliberately blocking aid, and she
blocks me.
Because that's what cowards do. Now look, I've
blocked plenty of people in my time for
reasons that are because they're just
obvious. But bottom line is, I'm not going,
you're stupid and I hate you and I'm
I'm simply pointing out a fact.
And you block that fact because you have
no response.
Right?
I'm sure the people out there that think
I did it to them. And the point
is, I only block people when I'm I've
made the mind up these people are here
in order to extract the conversation or they're
absolutely constantly trolling and chilling whatever else. My
point is, I will always engage as you
guys see all the time with people that
are just simply trying to battle on the
points.
And it's sad that these people just because
they they showed you. They know what they're
doing. But that also should reflect the fact
that she knows she's standing here telling you
that this isn't true, while what they're doing
is starving children as she speaks.
That should be her legacy for the rest
of her life.
And here's the article. Israel deliberately blocked humanitarian
aid. 2 government bodies concluded. Here is,
a point about this coming from the Atlantic
where Netanyahu told Blinken Israel denied humanitarian aid
because they wanted to inflict punishment. That's coming
from the Atlantic.
You know why? Because it's easy to prove.
Not only do they deliberately want to conflict,
but because they've said it openly. No water.
No fuel. They're all animals. It's obvious, and
we all know it. Everybody.
The point is now it's coming out. Even
Blinken later certified that Israel had not arbitrarily
denied humanitarian aid.
The point is
alright. Hold on. Did I misread that?
Oh, so he simply tried to argue that
he didn't do that. But the facts are
obvious. That's why he's saying testable.
So we have ProPublica. We've got Atlantic covering
this. It's not because they said so. The
evidence is already there as we've been covering
for a long time. Max Blumenthal covered that
Tony Blinken was even written up this week
for lying to congress about blocking aid.
And yet, here she is trying to say,
it's fake. We're lie you're lying. We're not
blocking aid. They're stealing it. No. You're blocking
it. In fact, we have hundreds of videos
of settlers blocking it, burning food, destroying the
food in general, of you guys deliberately stopping
things that going in. We have the w
c k c k. We've got Hugh UNRA.
We've got,
World Food Program. Every single one of them
say you've shot at them, you've attacked them,
you've murdered their people, you've stolen from them,
you've returned back aid that was just bandages
and crutching
over and over and over. You guys all
know this. The sad thing is they're still
gonna lie about it.
So here's Matt Miller
continuing to lie about this very point.
Specific follow-up on that. You you talked about
these, different parts of the state department making
different recommendations.
In the ProPublica story, and and and I
guess we know about this from from the
NSM, but
the
if you if you were gonna look at
look to parts of the US government to
tell you on the specific question of whether
a country is,
blocking the delivery of humanitarian aid, wouldn't you
look to USAID and PRM in this building?
Aren't they the 2 exactly the 2 parts
of the government that you would ask that
question? So I would look to them. I
would also look to our experts in the
region, our experts in the bureaus that cover
the region, as well as other US government
agencies. And that's what we did. And without
speaking to the recommendation of any individual component,
any individual bureau or agency, because it wouldn't
be appropriate for me to do that, the
secretary got conflicting recommendations and had to resolve
those. Doesn't it suggest and isn't the secretary's
decision based on recommendations he's taken this the
expert
recommendation of on that specific humanitarian question
and considered it looking at the political and
So strategic other other influences and made a
decision. But the actual technical advice from the
2 agencies involved in that specifically was
that they are blocking it. So this is
not a comment about the the question, but
I it is a comment about some of
the criticism that the secretary has received. One
of the things that I have found over
the years in my in government is when
there are conflicting reports,
the side that had the opinion that you
agreed with was the expert side, and the
other side was a bunch of political hacks.
Yeah. Except a literally one side is experts
in the field of what you're discussing, the
other side are literally politicians. So that's a
stupid thing to say. All you're trying to
do is water it down as if, well,
we both make that claim. No. We don't.
One side are the experts in the in
the group. The other side are politicians who
have an interest in hiding part of that
information. And all he did was side with
the with the argument that was there was
not a problem.
I mean, it's it's it's objectively obvious to
see, especially now that it's come out, that
they were wrong. And that is always the
way that people people,
interpret these.
We look at it as all all of
the all of these officials who made recommendations
had expertise. And the sec Oh, yeah. But
see that's he's loves to play word games.
No. No. No. We're talking about expertise in
the actual dynamic. What will USAID, for example,
of people that are actually in the context
of delivering food and whether versus politicians
who like, for example, to say you're an
Iran expert in US politics is a laughable
joke as Robert talks about all the time
because what they're experts in is the propaganda
narratives. Most of them have never even been
to Iran. So the game is about these
experts having expertise, but it's really about how
we're supposed to manipulate the information. It's what
they do for a living. Valued
all of their expertise equally
and ultimately took their recommendations, but also dived
into the underlying facts and dived into
not just
looking backwards months months months months, but what
the the change in the situation and the
change in the delivery of humanitarian assistance when
we made that assessment.
So he's just trying to muddy the waters.
Did they block it or not, bud? That's
what matters. What they're saying is, woah, we
stood back and we looked at their long
term dynamic and whether they tried, that's what
he's really getting at as he says in
a second, what they really did best effort
to make it better and yeah, I didn't
fix it but they tried. That has nothing
to do with anything. They blocked it, we
can prove that. And all you did was
lean into the idea that maybe they didn't
mean to some kind
of abstract nonsense.
The point is, he's not accidentally doing that.
He's lying. That's what his job is, to
obfuscate
for Israel, it seems, but obfuscate.
And found that to be just as important
as the events that had happened,
in the previous months. And the reports language
reflected all of that. We were quite transparent
about Yeah. How we had seen the situation
change over time. Oh. Wait. Wait a second,
Matt. Clearly represented by the shock and awe
of the people in the room. Clearly represented,
but nobody agrees with Matt. I don't understand
how you can say the secretary valued all
their expertise equally
when he rejected
the the the side that He so you
can value someone's expertise and still disagree with,
I value very much your reporting, Matt. I
disagree with some of the stories that you
write. You can value Well, first of all,
I question I question that. You can you
can value someone's expertise and still disagree at
times with their recommendations when you have conflicting
information.
It's just Wait. Wait. So there was conflicting
information that's suggested? You had conflicting assessments from
different bureaus inside the department. Okay. But assessments
were based on facts on the ground. Right?
They were based on Right? They were What
what was what was happening on the ground?
So it's not just So it Right was
the answer, Matt. Correct. Because but it wasn't
though. You see, one side had facts on
the ground, which is what Matt's getting at.
The other side
had a political perspective.
And they spoke to Israel. And they said,
well, what's going on in Israel? Oh, here's
what really here's what happened. Well, one side
has facts on the ground and can see
that a was blocked, and we can prove
it. The other side is, like, well, let's
consider the contextual reality of how Israel's dealing
with BS.
That's what they're doing. It's very simple. And,
Matt, it clearly has no BS in this,
which is why I like his work in
here. Unless one of these 2 bureaus
just got it wrong
and didn't then It is they were giving
their No. It is Their their assessment was
based on the fact. No. It is not
just the He said no, by the way,
but I don't think he meant to, but
that's funny how it sounded. Assessment of facts
on the ground, but how facts change over
time, which is one of the things we
laid out in the report. There you go.
Simple.
So the facts on the ground prove they
blocked aid. But
when we let it go on for another
6 months and we go, well, they did
their best effort to try this. It doesn't
change the fact that they deliberately blocked the
aid, which by the way, a child can
see today because it's been proven 40,000 times
over. But because Israel did their best or
at least they told Matt on the phone
that, and he didn't care to believe it
doesn't even matter if he believes it or
not. They said it, and I'm gonna repeat
that. The bottom line is Israel did their
best to change it, and we're gonna stick
it out till the end. That's what he's
that's what he ultimately about to say. That
if you looked at the actions by the
government of Israel and as important as actions
at time, inaction, things that we had recommended
they do that they didn't take,
we concluded that some of the actions they
took and some of the inactions,
things that they hadn't done had led to
a slowdown in delivery of humanitarian assistance. No.
No. No. No, Matt. No slowdown. A deliberate
blocking of aid, which is what the facts
showed and you damn well know that. He's
miting the waters. This is political gobbledygook. But
we had intervened with them and they had
had taken a number of meaningfully,
meaningful steps in another direction. Oh, did they?
Well, gee, I wonder the next question which
Matt will ask is, well, did it change
then? That led us to make the assessment
that we did. To the point where now
everything is just That was a this as
I said, it is an ongoing assessment. Oh,
okay. So they didn't listen then. So you
said do this. They didn't, and it's an
ongoing process. So the only ongoing process is
you said do something, and they didn't do
it. So it's ongoing.
That's gonna be pretty damn embarrassing for this
moron. But, you know, people see through it
today because it's obvious.
You can't just lie that clumsily about the
well, we're we're trying to cease fire with
Hamas, but we can't let Hamas be part
of the ceasefire. Right? Without people going, okay.
These people are clowns. They're desperate. They're lost.
They're complicit in genocide. And I think the
world sees this. Now the only thing we
should be hoping for here is accountability
around that and the immediate stopping of murdering
of innocent people.
But they don't want that. So they're gonna
keep dragging this out. That's why we're trying
to find ways to stop this outside of
the US government having a sudden conscience. Because
it doesn't.
But that's pretty sad, isn't it? The obvious
nature of what they're doing. The deliberate, deliberate
misrepresentation
of knowing and at the evidence proving that
they blocked this aid, and that's the best
you got. These are supposed to be the
representations of the rules based order. Right?
It is depressing
at the end of the day because some
people want you know, we should be relying
on one entity to save us all from
something, but it's sad to see that the
group you know, people want to believe this
is the shining beacon of something. It doesn't
mean it doesn't exist. Don't let that be
the alternative. But they are not that.
Now here's what Heretz wrote. Right? So as
these people are gaslighting for the most obvious
genocide on the planet today, here's what their
own corporate media says in Israel.
Hamas
surprised Israel with an organized attack. Israel surprised
Hamas by expelling the residents of the northern
Gaza Strip.
But more than it surprised Hamas,
Israel surprised itself
when it decided to leave hostages behind.
It's another of a long string of scathing
articles showing you that the Israeli government doesn't
give an s h I t about its
people. Just like your government.
That's what they're all screaming as they march
in the streets, but you're not gonna see
that because the western media is corrupt.
Now let's talk about
why your your government doesn't seem to wanna
care about that. Whether it's Trump or Kamala,
mind you. We're gonna make a big point
about that.
Now this is just on the Trump side
of this, and I think it's important because
he seems to be the one that people
think is gonna save the world from the
rising problems.
And what's funny is, like, it doesn't even
seem that you get that sentiment from the
Democrats about Kamala. We're just rather just joy
and positive change, I guess. It's like a
kind
of sound like a like a lesser version
of Obama. But the funny I don't mean
that like in any other sense that, you
know, hope and change kind of a dynamic.
But what's funny
is that they're all actively doing the same
things in different levels.
And, I mean, really, if you come back
to the main point of what is clearly
the the central point in all these problems,
they're all blindly acquiescing to that. Now here
is Donald Trump back in 2019,
making a case not just about Israel and
the government, but Israelis,
generally speaking. As the Times of Israel writes,
Trump says Israelis
should be immune from international criminal court.
Friday's statement
marks the second time, twice, US and up
until this point anyway.
The US administration
explicitly
vows to protect
citizens of Israel
for prosecution.
Think about that.
So we're we're not gonna allow,
this not Israeli government or military citizens of
Israel to be persecuted,
or rather specifically held accountable, by the International
Criminal Court. But by the way, it's the
same thing it did in you this country
in regard to Iraq war criminals or Afghanistan.
But the point was making sure you understand
that Trump at that time was doing the
same thing
blindly.
You can't just broad stroke this. What if
they committed to a mass atrocity?
Nope. Not Israelis though.
That's crazy. That is absolutely crazy no matter
how you spin it.
Well, don't I'm gonna go through a couple
new clips you might not have seen, but
I'll start with the one you have.
Realizing that this is what they all think,
but they don't all say out loud. That
seems to be one of Trump's kind of
failures overall, that he tends to say the
quiet part out loud because he thinks it
gives him a a boost.
Right? He's speaking in front of Israeli audience
and he says the thing you're kinda supposed
to say.
He does that all the time. Maybe it's
by design. You can decide for yourself. But
here are a bunch of clips but I'm
not gonna play them all. The one I'm
gonna play is right here. 2 of them
well, the point is one of them is
about tracking in the biometric wall, which is
coming. They all want that, Kamal included. The
idea of the COVID 19 jab being very
good and still saving lives which we all
know isn't true. That's right up into this
moment. He still blindly pushes that not as
in
not something doesn't hate on it. He blindly
still says that it saves lives.
If you get it, you don't get sick.
He still says that. Everybody knows that's not
true. But the point I wanna play is
the idea of how congress,
rightfully so,
used to be controlled by Congress. That's a
quote. Rightfully so. Or Israel used to control
Congress,
and he's gonna make it that way again.
You know, the biggest change I've seen in
Congress is Israel
literally owned the congress. You understand that 10
years ago, 15 years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And I think you know exactly what
I what I'm saying.
They had such power. Israel had such power
and rightfully
over congress.
Very clear. It's a very public radio
experience
rightfully so over congress.
It's no misunderstanding that. Again, I I've there's
4 other clips I have where he's saying
some other form of the same thing. I'm
also include. You know,
Israel was the most powerful lobby
in the country 15 years ago.
Today, between Tlaib and AOC and all of
these people, what they're doing,
Israel,
they don't have the backing that they once
had. You'll give it to them. Yeah. I
have the I'm good.
And and the other one he says,
today, they wouldn't be in politics.
Right? AOC and Julian with the rest today.
If if there was like it was then,
they wouldn't be in politics. Okay. So you're
admitting openly that Israel controls who's in US
politics, or at least that's how he sees
it. There's no way to misunderstand that. So
these ones were about him saying, shut the
Internet down with Bill Gates because of ISIS
joiners.
It's just crazy how people ignore all these
red flags. Here he is saying, take the
guns away. Do process later. It was for
different conversations. But this was about this conversation.
So I include these other 2 clips as
well. Both of which in a Trump rally
advanced Trump rally where they had seemingly more
Israeli flags behind them than American flags. They
were introduced by Miriam Adelson and in speaking
to an audience all about pro Israel dynamics.
And and why would you have Israeli flags
behind you at a Trump rally for an
American presidency?
Good question. But both of them, you could
watch as one I just explained, are saying
the same things.
Here are clips from Trump's recent campaign event.
Trump openly states Israel used to control the
US Congress, and he says that it will
again when he's president. Now for all the
people down there going, that's not what it
says. It's explicitly
what it says. And he's repeated it over
and over again. These are either bots or
people that just don't want to hear it
because it upsets them.
Now, here's Mary Madison, Sheldon Addison's wife, as
he's now passed, she was telling you, he
did all these things for us. He gave
us the Golan Heights. He moved Jerusalem. None
of which he had the legal authority to
do, all of which were criminal acts, according
to the international community.
Those matter.
And I'm a play clips here that I
added to this thread, which are pretty damn
concerning.
Telling you that, well, I'll let it speak
for itself.
Higher world, and you have to take it
that it is a wake up call. Get
smart.
Instead, even here in America, Jewish citizens have
been forced to endure the worst outbreak
of anti Semitism in many generations,
and so many people shockingly even deny the
Cole, I'm gonna come back with that one
since I'm gonna go into antisemitism after. I
thought I had that one at the end.
As I promised, I recognized
Israel's eternal capital and opened the American
embassy in Jerusalem. Jerusalem became the capital.
I also rec
and the reason that was necessary for the
Israeli agenda is because that's not how the
the Jerusalem dynamic was supposed to be different
based on the actual two state solution.
Right? But Trump gave it to him, so
too late. You know, it's like it it
there's no legitimacy to anything they're doing.
And if you go back I mean, even
you Israel used to pretend they wanted that.
They never did. That's obviously clear. That's why
they funded Hamas to make sure they were
divided according to even heretz.
But what he did was just hand it
to them. Here's Golan Heights. Here's Jerusalem.
And none of this was legitimate.
Recognize Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights.
Syrian territory.
There's no reason anywhere in the world why
that would make sense. But, of course, because
you don't care about illegal occupation. Not in
Syria, not in Afghanistan, not in Iraq, not
in Palestine, not in not in Syria for
Israel. Right? Not Lebanon for Israel. It doesn't
matter. We can illegal occupy whoever we want
because that's who they are. Don't misunderstand that.
That's not an accident.
They do not follow the rules and laws
they force in everybody else.
What he's saying is we gave them land
that they took illegally
from Syria according to everybody who was standing
in the conversation because he wanted
to. You know, Miriam and Sheldon
would come Adelson, what I was just talking
about. Come into the White House probably almost
more than anybody.
You see my point? By a part out
loud. He's trying to see speaking to the
Israeli American council.
Right? Another Zionist influential
platform that has little to do with anything
other controlling US politics and using PACS influence
politics. And what's funny
is this part is meant to, like, show
them he will do this again.
Right? That I'll lean to your interests. That's
what he's trying to demonstrate. But he does
it in a very loud way that makes
average people go, well, that's weird.
Why are these Israeli
oligarchs
coming to the White House more than anybody?
Shouldn't it be somebody with American interests? You'd
think.
It's more than anybody
outside of people that work there.
And they were always after. And as soon
as I give them something, always for Israel.
As soon Always for Israel, not for the
United States. As soon as I give them
something, they'd want something else. I said, give
me a couple of weeks. Will you please?
Right. Just constantly getting stuff from Trump using
your tax dollars. Right? Using your using his
time that's supposed to be in the interest
of Americans for another country.
Number 1.
But I gave them the Golan Heights and
they never even asked for it. Oh, really?
I I don't believe that. I think it's
pretty clear that they asked for it. That's
he said that otherwise, by the way. Again,
he's trying to beef himself up for the
crowd. I gave him it illegally even though
he didn't even ask for it. He's already
said before that they they asked him for
it, that he made this clear in many
responses. So Trump's a liar. We should know
that by now. They're all liars. They they
lean into what they want you to think
in all cases. But what's crazy about it
is both Kamal and Trump are doing this
in every way. They are fighting to display
themselves as more pandering to Israel than the
other.
That should be terrifying for Americans that actually
care about foreign influence. All of it from
anybody.
For 72 years,
they've been trying to do the Golan Heights.
Right? Yeah. Since their legal occupation of Palestine,
right, in the beginning, they've been trying to
take Syrian land. Yep.
Clear. And,
even Sheldon didn't have the nerve, but I
said, you know what? I said to David
Friedman, give me a quick lesson, like, 5
minutes or less on the Golan Heights. And
he Oh, good. So he educated himself.
Right? Hey, Israeli. Tell me what I need
to know about the land you want.
Now, yes, he is supposed to be The
point is David Friedman is one of many
Zionists that influenced the US political dynamic. And
the bottom line as an ambassador himself is
the is the the middle of bridge there.
And the bottom line is he is a
shockingly
open Zionist for Israel's interest at the expense
of everything. Friedman,
open. Look at his work. Look what he
says. The bottom line is that he would
give Donald Trump
an outline that this is our land, evil
bad guys have it, Syria's bad guy, Syria's
Arabs wanna kill all Jews, so we want
it and that's for our safety. And Trump
goes, oh, okay. So this is my point
about why Trump, whether or not he is
aware he's doing it, is e it's the
same point. They use his hubris. Oh, you're
gonna surround yourself with the most in educated
people? Clearly not. You're gonna surround yourself with
what you're told are the most educated people
by the people controlling what you do. Which
means you're gonna be played. Even if you
think he's I'm I'm I'm of the mind
that he's far more involved.
But even if not, there it is right
there.
He gave you a 5 minute lesson on
land disputes that are stolen from other countries.
Yeah. You need a bit more than 5
minutes to understand the dynamic around Golan Heights
that Israel wants to steal because of massive
water resources and others, as as well as
the high ground to be able to bomb
down, which they've been doing ever since, bombing
into Syria.
Which, in reverse, was not happening despite the
constant claims to the effect.
And he just got told lies and dumped
it over, even though he doesn't have the
legal ability to do that.
He did. And I said, let's do it.
We got it done in about 15 minutes.
Right? Think about how disgusting that is.
Oligarch billionaires in backroom signing papers say, here,
take this land illegally.
Yeah. It's disgusting.
It's disgusting. That's who these people are. They're
making back deal room backroom deals about everything
that affects your life that has nothing to
do with you or your interests,
constantly.
Here's the next one. All across our land,
you've
seen Jewish
Oh, wait. Maybe that was the wrong one.
So this I'll end with this one. Sorry.
But I guess this was the right one
the first time. Entire world, and you have
to take it that it is a wake
up call, get smart.
Instead, even here in America, Jewish citizens have
been forced to endure the worst outbreak
of anti Semitism in many generations,
and so many people shockingly even deny the
attack took place. This is a new thing.
I saw it
recently where they're interviewing people. They said, well,
we don't know if there was an attack.
I don't know. It's just so terrible.
I don't even know what he's talking about.
Is he trying to act like we're he's
just trying to make a point about denying
holocaust, but kind of clumsily overlapping with October
7th. I mean, there's plenty of discussions about
how they might have allowed it, But is
anybody anywhere pretending it didn't happen?
We know for a fact they've lied about
a lot. Fact, easily proven to be the
vast vast majority of these anti Semitic attacks.
And that was proven by corporate media in
any case. That was proven by in police
investigation.
Even the congress in congressional settings, they're forced
to admit these things never happened.
But they just keep lying anyway. But see,
he is speaking to a certain audience. And,
you know, there were people
I read Or certain financial backers. Many times
during
the holocaust, we had people denying it. They
were deniers.
They said,
we don't
believe it ever took place.
And it's So see right there, he's just
cobbling it together. What he said was during,
but then said, they never took place.
Well, Well, that doesn't make sense. How could
you say it didn't take place while it
was happening?
He's just leaning into the narratives, what he
does. It's a terrible thing when they say
that. I never thought I would see anything
like what is happening right now. I never
thought you'd ever see a thing like this
ever happen. You would it's beyond
it's beyond belief. You know? 15 years I
don't even think he knows what he's talking
about right there. To go Israel with the
strongest
lobby, if you wanna use the word lobby,
had the strongest representation of people like this.
These are great people, Miriam. Miriam. So just
so it's clear, he's talking about Miriam, and
she is not an a lobbyist right back.
She is a a Israeli oligarch who's acting
in the interest of Israel and openly says
West Bank annexation
is what she wants, and he agreed.
It's illegal. In every stretch of the imagination,
even according to US law and US politic
political stance, it's illegal.
But he he took a $100,000,000 and said,
okay.
And so what he's telling you right there
is that this he's pointing at them who
aren't even lobbyists necessarily. They're just people giving
him money for the interest of Israel. And
he's telling you right there, that's influencing his
decision making process. But you'd ever see a
thing like this, John. You know, 15 years
ago, Israel was the strongest
lobby, if you wanna use the word lobby,
had the So he's using that as kind
of a euphemism for just Israeli government influence
over US politics. Strongest representation
of people like this. These are great people,
Miriam.
But the strongest there was if you said
something about a Jewish person or something about
Israel that was bad,
you were out of politics. Oh, yeah. Alright.
Yeah. You you you said Israel bombed children.
Oh, you're out of politics, man. Can't say
anything bad about Israel.
I'm sure people will try, that's not what
he meant. But how Yeah. You His words
have meaning.
You don't know what he meant any more
than I know what he meant. We're taking
what his words say, and we're reading. And
the point is, he said that over and
over now,
many times.
Rightfully so. Israel controlled congress. Right? You can't
keep pretending that he's not saying exactly what
he's talking about. He thinks that they're supposed
to control us.
Hope you're hopefully, you're paying attention.
Unless your name was Ted Cruz, he could
he could get through.
The last one is about the anti semitism.
Tou rest and attack across our land, you've
And don't forget what we're talking about, which
is, by the way, been proven
that the ADL
took every single Palestinian protest and called an
antisemitic event,
which I'm I guarantee some of them exist.
Many, many, many, many of them have already
been shown to have been outright fabrications,
very clearly. That's not my opinion.
But the point is that some of them
sure exist.
But you if you label every Palestinian event
as a as anti semitic, that's why you
saw 400%.
That's what they're all pointing to. Every time
this conversation comes up, that's what the the
dark cloud of anti sem it's all because
of that false number coming from the ADL
using anybody wearing a certain flag or way
saying a certain none of which is even
remotely anti Semitic.
It could be if you want to be
racist about something and say, you know, my
point is by saying from the river to
the sea does not mean anything other than
what those words mean.
You could argue that means I wanna destroy
Israel in that context, but that still wouldn't
even be anti Semitic because you're talking about
a country. The only way it becomes that
is by them claiming if you say that,
therefore, you being all the Jews, that's what
you're doing. You are putting that lens over
there. The fact is that's not even the
reality.
It's the exact opposite today, and it's growing.
But he's gonna tell you because of this
allegation
that's already been proven to be false, not
to say that it doesn't exist in racism,
but at the point of the the rising
cloud, he wants to do something about that.
And if you don't recognize that's the same
thing Clinton was saying, the same thing the
corporate media, CNN were talking about, that we
need to stop antisemitism. How do you think
it's gonna do that?
First of all, that would be hate speech,
ladies and gentlemen, whether you wanna call it
that or not, to avoid how close you're
getting to the left right now because you're
the same thing.
It's about stopping hate speech. That's not a
crime.
We can all say being racist is disgusting.
That's separate if you wanna say that. I
agree. You're a gross person. But you have
a right to say it under free speech.
But apparently, Trump and Elon Musk and the
rest of them, who are partnered with the
ADL and are currently censoring those things, don't
think that.
But you can keep lying to yourself, so
when he says, I'm gonna shep in the
1st day and tackle this problem,
what do you think that means?
Is he gonna strangle your throat? Is he
gonna come tell you, come tap you on
the wrist? No. They're gonna take government action
to stop you from saying those things.
Especially when it means
the Israeli government committed a crime and they
call that antisemitism.
Same difference. And you think Trump's gonna somehow
make that distinction? He's not. He's already doing
it right now when he says all of
this antisemitism, when we know that's a lie.
Seeing Jewish Americans harassed and attacked and terrorized
by antisemites
and
Hamas sympathizers.
Oh, Hamas sympathizers? See, this is how lazy
this is. You could just call them
Palestinian or or you know, the point is
that the vast majority of them, as you
can listen to them say themselves, don't support
Hamas. They support the act of resistance, but
they do not support just, like, look, just
like I would say,
you can argue if an act of resistance,
I'd be supported by damn near anybody
because they're supporting the resistance of the Palestinian
state, but
Hamas is funded by Israel, so why would
I support Hamas?
See, that's a that's a consistent
stance.
Because I I I don't support the organization
because I'm worried that there is still influence
from Israel. I think that's a valid point.
But I can also argue that it's changed
over the years because it has gotten I
think, obviously, has lost control over it to
some degree since 2006.
But I guarantee as they still funded them
up until October 7th that they have influence
there.
So I'm arguing very clearly other than them
going wink wink, see all this means, Hamas,
that the most of them do not,
out of principle.
But it it it doesn't even matter. The
point is they're not talking about Hamas, but
they're talking about people that support Palestine.
But it doesn't matter because it's all about
getting to the point where it can tricking
the Republicans into going after that, which comes
around and bites you in the butt. Or
they then censor you claiming that what you
do, oh, you're wearing a red hat. You
anti Semite.
Did we all forget that already?
Apparently so.
I can't believe what we've been witnessing over
the last year. Actually, I've watched it
in great detail. I've watched it, and I've
watched it take place. It's hard to believe.
Yet despite
presiding over this explosion of anti Semitism,
Kamala Harris has done absolutely
nothing.
She has not lifted a single finger to
protect you, or to protect your children,
or to even protect you with words.
I'm here today to tell the Jewish American
community that this ugly tide of anti Semitic
pro Hamas
bigotry, and hate
will be turned back and crushed
starting at noon on January 20, 2025.
Oh, good. So the moment he's elected, he's
gonna suppress your speech.
Woo hoo. Free speech. Boo.
Right? Tell you that's what you're doing. There's
no way around it. But you're gonna see
that. Because the people screaming about free speech,
save your Elon Musk, gonna go up, but
not that though because that's bad. Or just
be quiet about it because you don't wanna
call out your side. That's cowardice. That's
childish.
Kamala Harris, Because she's in charge? It's just
lazy argument. Look. I'm the I will be
the first to tell you that Biden probably
can't tie his own shoes. But to pretend,
even though you can't definitively prove this, that
Kamala is just the one that's responsible for
everything,
is lazy
because she didn't take action. She's not the
president.
Now I'm the again, I will argue that
it's certainly possible that that's how this worked
out, but they don't know that any more
than you do. That they just wanna use
it because that way we can claim Biden's
track record is now Kamala's. Even though that's
not how it's ever worked with the VP,
but it doesn't matter. Because nope. None of
these people are honest. Not even the ones
following them acting like they're actual followers trying
to get you to follow too. That's the
mainstream alternative media and all these partisan screamers.
They're in this for a very different reason
than you think you're fighting for.
I believe that.
Now here
is what's going on. Here's Josh Hawley, one
of the many Zionist manipulators out there screaming
in, you know, lies in defense of Israel,
shouting down somebody from one of these colleges
because they wouldn't call long live the intifada
hate speech. Now ask yourself how it makes
sense to see a Republican screaming about suppressing
hate speech. Why? Because you're all the same
thing. I shouldn't even say it like that
because it's not gonna reach the people that
I want it to. They're the same thing.
The left and the right of the government,
guys, they're just driving you in a position
to rationalize the suppression of your speech. And,
really, it doesn't matter what point you give
them.
You give them this tomorrow, everything's suddenly antisemitism
because they can then suppress it. That's how
this works. You give them an inch, they
take 47 miles every
time. They're gonna be used against you. And
Trump's gonna roll it in. And whether that
becomes some digital ID to stop it and
people go along with it, it's gonna be
the same kind of direction, all leading you
in the digital panopticon. I see it building,
and I know you do too. It's time
to call out these screamers,
the partisan people, the may the mams out
there who are constantly lying to you, even
though some of you notice it. No. It's
not globalism.
It's clearly Israel in this case, but we
don't wanna say that because that's the boo
boo word we're gonna go say. They're not
on your side if they're doing that.
Now here, they're trying to convince you that
long live the intifada
is some height to height speech. Now even
if you think it means terrorism, which it
doesn't,
it's not hate speech. And this is, guys,
the right. The right wing conversation trying to
convince you that this is not just hate
speech, but we need to stop this. That
they, as college leaders, are supposed to be
stopping them from saying these things.
How can we not see how easy that
is? Again, if you've forgotten that they called
you all antisemites because you were a right
wing you're a right wing Nazi. Right? Red
Hat means anti Semites. Look at them saying,
we hate Jews. That they were all framing
you like that. Now suddenly you're doing that
to the other side? How are you this
easy to manipulate?
Now to be clear, intifada
does not mean anything other than resistance.
Struggle.
Of course, you could use it as a
bad word. I could use the word revolution
to mean all sorts of terrible things, or
it could mean the American Revolution.
Right? You can say long live the revolution.
It's the same damn thing.
The only reason they call into thought or
bad is because they make they want you
to think of some evil Muslim terrorist when
you think of that word. They are playing
on your ignorance.
Now, obviously, I could say that and mean
terrible things.
But to pretend that it is that no
matter what is an Israeli propaganda
interest.
There's a reason people are saying long live
the resistance.
Because right now, the world is changing whether
you like it or not. And people around
the world, and who knows? Maybe even even
if it's a positive step to begin with,
it could lead the worst position. That's just
the way the world works. But, nonetheless, I
will always still side on what's right for
people resisting occupation. For the they for the
people that I've stepped on.
The country that may Africa, entirely, it seems.
Most of these countries are seeing an opening
and are pushing back, and they are trying
to crush them.
This is what they're doing. This is what
they're leading. The the the crushing of a
any resistance
to authoritarian power.
Don't but last thing, but don't forget the
whole Musk and the you this you watch
this movie, you side with the resistance. You
watch this movie, you side with the resistance.
In real life, you side with the empire.
They are the empire. Elon Musk and Trump
and Kamala and Biden, they are the empire
and you're siding with them. But meanwhile, the
resistance,
you're calling terrorists.
And any student targeted on campus, a Jewish
student Will you condemn this right here? Right
here. Long live the epiphanal. You By the
way, isn't it funny that isn't that exactly
what the left was being called out for?
Do you condemn Hamas? Do you condemn Hamas?
Right?
You're the same thing. Condemn
Jewish students aren't targeted on a campus that's
being targeted, and the office of civil rights
should successfully be given funding. Will you get
will you condemn this as hate speech? I
think that can be hate speech, but I
don't think it's automatically hate speech. That's a
very valid argument. That's exactly what I'm saying.
See, this is logical.
Of course, I could say long lived intifada
while holding a Nazi symbol or whatever, and
you could say, well, that's how you're using
that to mean bad things. That's what con
that's how context matters. But even then, you
can't really know what they're thinking, so it's
still the same kind of manipulation. But, again,
obviously, even if it was hate speech, that's
not a crime, ladies and gentlemen. It's protected
under free speech. But these people don't care
because they're not really fighting for your free
speech or anything that works for you. But
what she's saying is that, yes, it can
be,
but we don't know that.
It could also just mean
long live the resistance,
and not the American revolution was the resistance.
But here's how they respond. The problem is
that there's nuance I'm trying to introduce to
this conversation. What's the nuance when these people
are marking the call of the Jews to
be killed? No. They're not. See, he this
guy loves to grandstand.
What do you mean? Well, when they're calling
for the where does it say that? Anywhere.
Are they saying that? No. Are they have
sign to say that? No. You're reading that
sign and going, that means kill the Jews
because you're a child or you're a blatant
manipulator for Israel.
But that's what we're dealing with, guys.
Cruz and the rest of them. They're all
doing the same thing. This is the right
side of the conversation,
screaming for censorship.
Sir, because long intifada also means uprising for
Palestinians. The way I know. So it's ambiguous,
so it's hard to say.
My gosh.
Yes.
It's a word that has multiple meanings.
This guy is just he's trying to hide
the reality.
But think about it like this, guys. If
that's the best they could put forward,
how do you not see that they're manufacturing
this?
These aren't they the ones telling you that
there's some dark rising cloud? They're marching through
the streets going, we all killed a Jew.
But then you don't seem to have that
evidence. All you have is this and going,
that's what it means?
Yeah. Because that's not happening.
They are just whole cloth manufacturing this to
save a dying entity.
Okay. Let's try another one. What about this?
Please. Audience will please
Oh, yeah. I I mean, I that's fine.
We we know what you think. Right. Exactly.
I mean, I think you've made it clear,
those who were cheering earlier when senator Cruz
was asking about the attempts to destroy and
kill Jews.
I I There's there's a video that went
around where they were taking out of context
because the the the microphone only picked up
the one moment where he was saying basically,
what it seems to me, the guy was
simply saying that all you're telling is talking
about the Jews. Talk about the Israelis.
Right? And they got the last part of
it. It goes the Jews, and that's all
they highlight.
And that's and and Cruz used it because
that's what they do. And even and let's
even say for sake of conversation, the guy
was a racist. What does that have to
mean about so because he is everybody anywhere
who disagrees with you is now a racist?
Well, that's how the government tends to frame
things because they're dishonest.
Just let let's just be clear about what's
going on here because here's what's happening at
this hearing. We can't talk about anti semitism
without also talking about something else. The message
that's being sent today, at this hearing today,
is antisemitism
isn't enough. The attempts to kill Jews on
campuses, that's not a conversation worthy of dis
See, hey, it's just lazy. All you just
did was conflate what they're doing with killing
Jews. That's not even objectively
that's not even intellectually
it's false.
I mean, period. He's holding a sign where
it says there is only one solution. Right.
So you wanna pretend that means some kind
of Nazi reference. They're talking about a 2
state or one state solution. I can't know
for sure which one they mean, but that's
what they're talking about.
It's it's it's everywhere. He's that is a
common sign we've seen. Now usually, I think
it means one state. That's why it's phrased
that way.
But to somehow that what he's trying to
make you think is the final solution, despite
the fact that Israel literally worked with Nazi
Germany during the final solution. But let's not
talk about the facts. Let's continue to conflate
calls for actual self determination in the end
of the war with the idea of hating
Jews because that's all you have.
Discussion. You've gotta add something else to it.
So if you wanna kill Jews, oh, well,
we can't talk about that unless we also
talk about How lazy.
Even he starts by saying
Palestine. Now he just jams it in to
say we can't talk about killing Jews without
talking about this. You're conflating even antisemitism
with killing of all Jews. You realize that
other people than Jews are semites and in
most cases they're not even semites. The bottom
line is because somebody has racist sentiments does
not mean they want to go as far
as to kill somebody even. I'm not even
defending racist sentiments. You've heard me denounce these
a 1000 times. If you think people are
bad because of their religion, racism, you're a
disgusting person and should be called out. But
for him to go as far as to
claim that anybody supporting Palestine, not just hates
Jews,
not just is antisemitic, but wants to kill
all of them, no matter what, because that's
just a blanket statement. This person is deserving
of ridicule.
Quite frankly, I think they know that. I
think most people think they're stupid. But, as
we've seen from the beginning,
they've lost all credibility because of their support
for genocide but they keep doing it.
Why? Is it funding? Is it blackmail? I
don't know. But it doesn't make sense, does
it? 15 other things and now we have
a witness sitting here Yep. Who will not
condemn the attempts on these campuses that are
blatantly anti Semitic tropes. Not even remotely. See,
that that he's play what he means by
that is that's what that really means, wink
wink. We know secretly what you mean.
Nope. That's dumb. That's ignorant.
Right? That's like everything else we've talked about,
saying this but meaning that. This is all
they have, which means they're lying to you.
Nazi tropes to try and kill Jews. What
about this one? There's only one solution.
Is that a a national organic human rights
movement? No, sir. I trust that's in reference
to holocaust, and that's I would say the
fine No. It's not. You see, she's just
trying to lean into this because it works
for her in the moment because they're attacking
her. How in the world would that mean
I mean, guys, it's just lazy.
But even if it did, does one sign
represent every single person fighting for self determination
for the Palestinian state?
Kill solution. What about this? What about this?
But
Glory to our martyrs. I
Yes. See, this is is he's playing on
the scare tactics they've been shoving down your
throat for your entire life. A martyr is
somebody who's been killed by Israel.
Right? It could be a fighter or it
could be a child that was murdered in
their bed. They're considered martyrs.
It's all it means.
So when you say glory to our martyrs
on a hospital building, it means glory to
the people you murdered, Israel. That's what it
means. He wants you to think it means
terrorists
because he's either that stupid or that dishonest.
Again, I don't understand the point of messaging
like that. I don't know what that means.
So you could this guy's a dog with
bone. He's just rapidly going after what he
wants her to say and what he wants
you to think because that's what politicians do.
They're liars.
There's no way around it. Now there's no
way to argue that there's no racism.
But to pretend, one, that every single person
fighting for Palestine is racist is just simply
dishonest.
But on top of that, again, to the
point we're making, these these are Republicans
actively calling for censorship.
Doesn't that concern Republicans who think you're fighting
Democrats trying to censor you based on culture
war points or social war I mean, this
is woke right. It's what it is.
Now here is Ritchie Torres
introducing the no foreign gifts act.
You know what that means? A bipartisan bill,
of course, because it's always bipartisan when it
has to do with Israel because they blindly
all are in one direction,
That would ban foreign nations that fund terrorism,
which by the way is arbitrary. They their
terrorism is whatever they say it is. Saudi
Arabia doesn't apply. Israel doesn't apply. All the
most obvious terrorist in the world doesn't apply.
Right? But Iran or somebody else. But here's
the point.
Banning them from donating to American universities. Okay.
Why is any foreign government donating to American
First Universities?
Doesn't that seem weird? Especially since there's many
points going around right now how there are
universities who are profiting from the war.
Doesn't that seem a little bit counterintuitive?
But either way, the obvious point is there's
no reason any foreign government should be funding
American schools. That seems pretty weird to me.
Now you could argue it's because they wanna
help, you know, whatever, but it's it's education
or whatever you wanna pretend we're doing with
our Prussian based,
you know, obedient workers' school system, which is
what it's literally based on. Prussia with a
p. But the bottom line
is that that means they could influence what
you're taught.
Why would we ever we're all screaming about
national security, but here, Israel, fund our education.
Doesn't that yeah. That's stupid. But here's the
point. They're only gonna stop what they don't
like. Right? Which none of it should be
allowed in my opinion, but you're gonna say
no, Russia, no, China, but yes, Israel, go
ahead. Yes, Saudi Arabia, go ahead and fund
our children.
Doesn't that seem stupid?
It's blind, blind support in the interest of
Zionism at the expense of you.
APAC Tracker made an excellent point. What happened
to all those free speech absolutists?
What are they why are they silent about
the antisemitism
awareness act? Which don't you think Trump that's
what they're all leaning into right now? Which
is about to criminalize
criticism of
Israel. We have to realize what this is.
We already talked about this. They're just putting
out this this track APAC thing. It's h
r 6090
or s 4127,
which will become one thing when they all
pass it. And the idea is that this
is using,
I think I had the
oh, I I I forgot the quote around
this. I I think it's the the holocaust
memorial
definition or what's the term? I forget the
term of the group. Anyway, it's based on
the the group built around that and their
point is that any criticism of Israel at
all, anything, even criticism of Zionism
is antisemitism,
therefore is illegal.
That's what your government is passing, bipartisan.
So how is that different than censoring hate
speech? It's not. They just simply now say
anything they wanna censor is hate is is
antisemitism,
Which by the way in their minds is
part of hate speech. So you're all the
same thing.
That's a sad reality to recognize because this
is coming. And they're using this
I thought I had it on the back.
Oh, jeez. Look at this.
Oh, let me jump this down here. We'll
come back to that.
So, forward the article here is writing senate
to advance the contentious bill to crack down
anti anti israel activity on campuses.
Be Even though that's legal.
You're supposed you have, I'm against a country.
Right? Not allowed to though, because to them,
with this new bill, if you're against Israel,
that's against the law. You could be against
China, you could be against Russia, you could
be against them. But not Israel though, that's
against the law.
That should make you uncomfortable.
There's no way in the world this aligns
with what we pretend we believe in this
country,
with the idea of our rights, constitutional and
otherwise. How does this make sense outside of
protecting Israel against you,
against your rights,
despite what you believe and what you pretend
to say? How do you not freak out
about this? You should.
I'm speaking to all the open minded people
out there, left or right, voting or not.
You see this. Don't be quiet about this.
Don't pretend like, you know, don't be cowed
into the position from all these screamers that
this election is just so important that we
have to ignore all this just until afterward.
No. They do it every time. Most important
thing every time. It's gonna be the same
damn thing in 4 years from now where
they're trying to drive you right back into
the same position.
Time for something different.
Here is that group Trump was speaking to.
He said it says get ready to be
inspired at the IAC National Summit 2024.
Our lineup of speakers includes leaders, activists, influencers.
Well, guess who is a lead speaker? Donald
Trump.
You got Donald Trump.
You got Michael Rapaport. Oh, these lovely, terrible
people. Oh, Alan Dershowitz, mister Epstein himself. I
only wear my underwear. Right.
Elon Levy. All these real great people. Right?
Guys, I know there are Republicans out there
that recognize how horrible,
like,
terrifyingly disgusting these people are.
Trump is the keynote speaker.
Hey, Mary Madison.
Doesn't this bother people? This is about people.
This is at and the the one I'm
gonna get to here is his royal highness
Reza Pahlavi. That is the son of the
shah.
Operation Ajax, the illegal operation that overthrew the
Iranian government and spun into a terrifying reality
for everybody but the oligarchy that Israel and
the US kept in comfort, and everybody else
was starving when terrible it was terrible.
Despite the narratives of the US government, it's
objectively the reality everywhere else in the world.
It's easy to prove. Then in 79, they
took their country back.
Right? And then from there forward, they called
terrorists even though it's obviously not the reality.
They're trying to convince you. And it but
the point to make here is not only
that Israel, but this all is being tied
back to Iran.
Right now, they are is you Trump and
Kamala are gonna be driving the idea that
Iran is the focal point because that's what
Israel wants. There is nothing that makes this
make
sense. Here he is, Reza Pahlavi. Tomorrow, I
will address and this was so this was,
on 20th. It looks like this happened.
So the the Islamic Republic wages war on
Iran.
Wait. As the Islamic Republic wages war on
Iran, Israel and the US and the Arab
world, we face a historic struggle. So all
he's trying to frame it as is that
Iran is against this. The people of Iran,
that's never been the case. Now there are
very clearly people who don't agree with the
current government, but they are not calling for
support from the outside. They make this point
every time. What you get are people like
this, the Israeli funded leaders, rulers outside of
these areas. We've already caught them multiple times.
Caitlin Johnson has written about it every time
trying to over to manipulate Iran yet again,
and they fail every
time. They do not want outside influence, but
they definitely have just like with this country,
half the country hates the current government. Does
that mean
some other country should step in and fix
it for us? That's what it is. That's
what the US pretends.
The bottom line is this is clearly building
towards this. And they've been doing this for
a very long time to is raw Iranian
regime change yet again for the interest of
the greater Israel project, what Israel is trying
to accomplish in the area at the expense
of everybody, including the peoples of every country.
D DiDi geopolitics, the exile prince gives his
unsolicited opinion. He says, this is not a
national patriotic war. Do not fall victim to
the the apocalyptic ambitions of communion. The is
is the Iranian leadership
and his corrupt associates of the Iranian rulership.
Turn back on your Iranian regime and stand
by the Iranian people.
The exiled leader.
It's it's just it's funny how they're these
are and my point from before. Whether it's,
you know, Africa, whether it's South America,
it's happening everywhere right now. There's a massive
push to try to take to shift pieces
and control of what they're trying to accomplish.
Desperately, I would say. Even if they have
managed to overthrow some of these countries right
now, there I think this Zionism is on
the way out.
Not me. It's never gonna go away like
any other ideology, but it is on the
idea of what it is and its influence
is waning.
Good. Because they're maniacs.
I mean, it's just not even up for
debate. Look at what they're doing.
My point is that this is what Iran
or rather Trump and Kamal and the rest
they're being driven to because of Israeli interests.
As Sal Diagris points out,
I need this that classic meme we've seen
many times. Iran wants war. Look how close
they put their country to our military bases.
I mean, this is not a joke.
There's far more than this to even know
about. The reality is that they have completely
encircled Iran both by the occupied countries and
the bases they built right along their border
and constantly act like Iran is always threatening.
Even though, as we've said earlier, whether it's
China or anybody else, they have not been
in the wars that we've seen both Israel
and the United States conducting
near daily.
But they all want you to think it's
somehow their fault secretly, despite the actions going
directly back to what they do. The in
the actions of Israel and the United States
on the claim of bad guy Iran. Don't
forget John Bolton, for example, during Trump's administration.
The limpet mines. Remember that whole dynamic?
The whole fiasco that turned out to be
absolute lies from Bolton.
It came out later that it was just
Iranian boats moving in their harbor.
That they saw some and they said, oh,
it's a credible threat. They just used it.
They made it up. And they used it
as a credible threat, which turned out to
be nothing. Fabricated limpet mines, which also got
exposed.
All to try to usher in some war
for Israel.
And they failed.
That itself could've been a massive war. I
mean, that's one that I forget to even
bring up. Trump loves to claim, oh, he
didn't start new wars, but that could've been
a war easily. And it would've been if
they'd exceeded. That's what they wanted.
Venezuela, the regime change, could've blown up into
a massive war. Same thing with the assassination
of Soleimani. But I go, oh, so that's
why. So that's Iran, same point. Either one
of those could've spun out into major wars.
It just didn't.
Doesn't mean it didn't study. I was at
trying to start those things. The reality though
is they're driving you to this position. Daniel
McAdams points out, this it's a clip from
a Ron Ron Paul show talking about America
isn't located in the Middle East. American troops
should only defend America.
And then Daniel says, what a novel idea.
The US military should actually protect, I don't
know, the United States.
But see, they love to make the argument
that this is protecting us even though what
they're doing is not in the interest of
Americans. It's only in the interest of Israel,
not even the Israeli people, but the Israeli
government.
And that they say that's in our interest,
but it's not. What they do drives these
things back home
constantly. Well, I don't mean necessarily military action
in the United States that seems to be
building though based on what they're doing. It's
only a matter of time, and I don't
want that. But it seems like that's what
Israel is trying to manufacture, if not drive
themselves.
But overall, it does cause the very problems
we're dealing with around the world. It does
blow back and we all know that. Sending
your military troops around the world for the
interest of another a genocidal empire
is only going to cause Americans to be
unsafe. It's the exact opposite of what they
claim they're doing.
Dan Dave Smith simply says, Iran poses zero
threat to this country.
The people advocating war with Iran pose a
major threat to this country.
They are your enemy.
Iran is not.
I love that he has the courage to
say that because a lot of his supporters
disagree with that very Republican leaning, I think.
Either way,
he's absolutely right.
Absolutely, 100% right. It doesn't mean that Iran
isn't capable,
technologically speaking. And I don't mean the lie
of nuclear weapons. I mean, just literally technologically
speaking. They very much even just the population.
They could wage a very serious war even
against the United States.
Clearly, they don't want that. They've demonstrated this
a 100 times over.
Even the current leadership
or even even go even overlapping that with
the number the different dynamics surrounding them. The
ancient location. We're talking about Syria or Lebanon.
The point is that these different the reactions
they've been pushing back, the restraint they've shown
over and over and over, or Russia, for
example, show you that they had every opportunity
a 1000 times over. If they wanted this,
they could have had it by now. The
only person trying to drive this through the
US and their own clumsy actions is Israel.
It's obvious.
So he's saying they're not a threat to
you.
The only ones are the ones trying to
drive you to war. I would think that's
pretty easy to understand.
Now Michael Tracey brings this into the point
about Trump supporters.
The question is, are the so called America
First Republicans
up to and including Donald Trump for or
against an upcoming war with Iran?
Important question to ask yourself if you're out
there supporting Donald Trump.
Now we're asked the same question, by the
way, to Kamala supporters, but what's interesting is
they it's a different dynamic, but specifically the
republicans.
I don't think if look. If you if
you are actually in the mind of America
first, how do you frame this as America
first? By pretending that they're a threat to
us is not America first.
That is the exact opposite. 1, they're not.
But secondarily, this is a foreign country in
the Middle East.
To simply say that they're gonna well, I
mean, the only way to make that would
make sense would be some kind of an
active attack, which doesn't line up with anything
they've ever done or even actions they wanna
take or what they claim they're gonna do
or even nuclear weapons. I mean, there is
a 1,000 other people that are far closer
and far more dangerous. The bottom line is
this is all narrative coming from your government.
There as you would speak to a 100
of the things that are needed in this
country before we even discuss that. So if
you're getting all amped up about going to
war for Israel because it's a foreign country,
maybe you should reflect on what America first
actually means.
Now let me show you what that means
in the minds of politicians.
Anya Prampil points out that she's I've been
I've been she's she says, I've seen more
US politicians
tweeting prayers for Israel over the last hour
that I've seen prayers for American people underwater
for days.
Going back to the the disaster,
the the the weather, the the hurricane.
Why aren't they speaking about that?
Or why are they praying for Israel while
what they've been doing is committing genocide for
a year and occupied countries that are fighting
back, which no matter what you think of
Lebanon's actions is the provable reality.
She says, why do we put up with
this occupied government?
Americans wake up.
Right? So when she says that, does that
mean she's a Neo Nazi? No. As somebody
ridiculously ac accused me of, who I won't
even bother naming because I liked his work
during COVID 19.
My the point to acknowledge that this government
is obviously,
whether through APAC or a 1,000 other mechanisms,
whether you wanna call it occupied, influenced, controlled,
is a no brainer.
Yes. You could argue that that's the reality
based on obvious, provable facts while also not
believing that Jews are bad or hating things,
you know, believing you're a white supremacist. That's
clumsy logic. It's not even logic.
It's it's an assumption based on narratives that
you've signed because the government played you to
think the skinheads think this way. The Zog
argument.
Well, yes. Because they're using these things to
trap you into thinking anyone that says that
is this way. Because they're hiding, just like
the Zionist government uses Judaism, they're hiding behind
that. You'd think you could piece that together
with the COVID nineteen narrative and the agenda
around that being so complicated.
In many cases anyway.
My point saying that is because it's obvious
to acknowledge, whether occupied or whatever word, that
the Israeli government is 100%
influencing our government in ways that are absolutely
too against their interests and yours,
They're being the politicians themselves.
So I'm just tired of people accusing you
of being a racist for simply pointing out
objective facts. But as she says, Americans wake
up. Now I could have gone a lot
further than this. What I decided to do,
just like I said the other day, I
started going through it and I said, this
is just a waste of time. It's everybody.
Every single one of them have come out
because they're supposed to
and said, I think this or I pray.
This didn't happen during other countries' wars. Did
you pray for the Sudan? Did you pray
for no. You didn't. Some of them might
have in certain occasions, but nope. There's a
thousand examples during these wars where they don't
go, I pray for this person suffering.
Even during ones we all talk about.
Like, I mean, I could go off for
just an example. You get it. There's plenty
of things you've seen where they the US
government pretends to care, but they all didn't,
in clear succession, come out and do the
the dutiful thing they were told they were
supposed to do.
So what I did this time was, like,
every everyone I see, I'm gonna pull aside.
And these are all the ones that popped
up in my feed. Now ask yourself this.
Why is this happening? Well, let's just start
with the start with this one.
Why would congressman Mike Lauer saying justice for
our marines, good riddance?
Why would that pop up in my feed?
I'm not following him?
I I clearly don't follow any politicians for
the most part, say for a few just
because of certain
circumstances.
Okay.
Maybe one you'd understand. Right? But 20 of
them? All in the same day?
You get what I'm getting at here? As
Elon's over here going, no more bold because
I don't like it. I think we get
what's going on.
I don't follow any of these people. And
yet for some reason, my feed was overwhelmed
with US politicians saying, I pray for Israel.
I think you know why.
So as she's saying, she's seen more than
1 hour than she's seen. That's there's a
reason for that. Because we're being algorithmically engineered
through Twitter to think that's what we're supposed
to be doing.
Okay. Congressman Mike Lauer,
pretending that this guy is a terrorist, has
been killed even though they murdered 100 of
people in massive civilian buildings, and he was
there because he was tricked into being there
under the guise of a diplomacy, under the
guise that there was a cease fire underway.
And then from the United Nations, using the
UN as a ploy as well, they murdered
him along with 100 of civilians. And that's
supposed to be targeted
according to this absolute
I mean, I can't you know, it's like
I
the more you talk about this stuff,
you say it enough and I'm like, you
know what? Monster doesn't even do it justice.
There needs to be something more for people
like this. The Brian Mass of the world.
Israel targeted Hezbollah terrorists with precision strikes. Iran
responds by launching its civilian. It's the exact
opposite, by the way. It's, I mean, provably,
according to many different locations. But, of course,
I said by targeted precise strikes, you mean
the buildings that they bombed in Lebanon,
killing hundreds of civilians, even by Israel's account?
They admitted that. All to try to kill
Nasrallah, which I get I think it's easy
to see. They didn't even know for sure
until after the fact. How is it possible
that there could be anyone left who does
not see your Israeli strings?
How you possibly can make the argument? I
mean, you could at least say that I
agree with it, but to call it precision
strikes that kid took down 6 buildings
for one
person, he's just a liar, guys. He's a
bought off manipulated liar.
I mean, it's it's like it's like saying,
I just take you take anything.
The sky is purple. The sky is black.
It doesn't matter. I guess any of those
cases could be. The sky is, I don't
know, magenta. The point I guess that any
I guess the sky could be any number
of colors. The point is to say something
that's just so fundamentally false and just say
it anyway, and we all know it's a
fault. That's a lie.
Even by Israel's own account, and it's painful.
But, oh, this person responded saying this guy
was a terrorist. What about the justice for
our 34 fallen shipmates that Israel killed when
they attacked our ship?
This is the actual account for the US's
liberty veterans.
Of course, that he won't say anything about
that because he doesn't care about US citizens
being killed. He cares about defending Israeli
government actions.
So, again, here's Mike that is representative Brian
Mast
saying
precision strikes where Iran targets civilians.
Everyone should condemn this brazen assault. We're not
condemning the genocide that went on for a
year. We're not condemning the hundreds of thousands
of people that have been killed there. We're
not condemning the occupation. We're not condemning the
illegal strikes on many civilian locations. No. No.
He just only wants you to condemn how
Iran responded to Israel's unjust
strike.
But wait. By Israel's own defense, that would
be defense though. Right? But no. No. Not
for Iran though because Brian Mass said.
These are criminals, guys. No way around it.
And, of course, here is what Israel's
targeted
strikes looks like.
Mass displacement,
destruction of entire locations.
Right. Does anybody trust people like Brian Mast?
Anybody other than Israeli Zionists? Anybody?
I don't know how how it's possible. Here's
Lindsey Graham. I realize this is all in
one general time frame. This is a moment
of choosing for the free world regarding Iran.
See, that's all that, you know, most important
election.
Choose now or we're all gonna die. That's
just how they get you, guys. They get
you emotionally wrapped up in the idea that
if we don't choose now, the free world
is gonna go. Boy, I thought the election
was about the free world and civilization.
No. But it's Iran and Israel too. So
whatever they care about is about the world
and civilization.
It says the Ayatollah and Iranian regime are
religious Nazis. Oh my god.
He went there.
So we're literally dealing with the perfect I
mean, what better embodiment in the world right
now than the Israeli Zionist mentality embodies religious
Nazis than any what better embodies that? Anywhere.
You realize what he so you're calling Hamas
Nazis or also
extremist Muslim. You know, either just whatever. It
doesn't matter. We'll just use ISIS or Nazi,
whatever works for the moment. But if you're
gonna call Iranian
leadership or rulership, your Iranian government,
religious Nazis,
while you are literally working with Ukrainian actual
Neo Nazis who are being funded by a
religious extremist government, Israel, who are absolutely aligned
with the Nazi ideology from day 1 all
the way until now. There's no question.
He's just trying to lump it onto them
because that's what you do. That's like saying,
leading state sponsor of terrorism while you guys
are literally funding all the terrorists.
It's just what you do
if you're a liar. And it says, who
want to destroy the state of Israel? Well,
actually, I would argue that they clearly want
to I mean, the state of Israel is
an entity. I bar I argue most of
these groups would want to get it out
stop it from existing.
Very different than murdering all the Jews or
killing every Israeli, which I don't think personally
that's what Iran's government or even their people
want.
You can decide for yourself. But if all
you're basing that on is these screeching cries
from Lindsey Graham, I think you should think
better if we listen to. But it says,
their words, not mine, which, no, it's not.
It's really not. When they say death to
Israel or death to the United States, they're
talking about the government as they've made clear
a 100000 times. Now, of course, you could
say they're lying.
But to argue that what they're saying means
death of Jews, they're not saying that either.
So you're taking their word from a person
who is absolutely lying about everything they do.
Lindsey Graham is one of the most dishonest
people I've ever seen in my life, standing
up and calling for the death of foreign
leaders and acting like that's not a big
deal. But it says they want to purify
Islam
and attack the United States. Again, their words,
not mine. That's not true.
He's talking about the extremists that the the
US and Israel are actively funding.
That's the reality. You wanna listen to the
MEK? That's what they talk about. They were
a terrorist organization on the list of the
US designation,
but Clinton took them off.
They don't change what they talk about. They
are radical.
What do you think what do you think
the Azov movement says? They're gonna spread the
white race around the world.
See, everything they support is that, but they
claim that's what the other people are doing
even though you don't see it anywhere.
Israel is absolutely saying this. They've threatened to
attack the United States should they not go
along with what they want more than once.
The missile attack against Israel should be a
breaking point despite the fact that they were
responding to attack on Iran that was illegal,
but who cares about the facts? And I
would argue the Biden administration
urged them to coordinate an overwhelming response with
Israel.
So he wants you to bomb Iran. That's
literally what he wants. This is one of
the classic examples. This guy has been around
a long time. He's been screaming and rapidly
frothing at the mouth about that as far
back as you can look.
These oil refineries need to be hit. Like,
do you realize what that means? He's literally
calling for the US government to attack Iran.
That would be World War 3.
There's no way around it.
Do you do you I mean, does it
does Lindsey Graham think that would be in
the interest of Americans
or anybody for that matter? This would not
be some one and done thing. This would
be a big deal. This would be an
Americans being killed. Why?
What's the argument that Iran is such a
threat? It's Israel driving him to do this.
There's no way around it. Yes. That's my
opinion.
He says my prayers are with the people
of Israel. That's the point.
One after another. I I should have included
that one for this segment because I wanted
to go quickly through it. We're back to
it the rest are short. But Lindsey Graham
is a dangerous person.
He is a dangerous,
dangerous, maniacal person.
Just make sure you really look into what
he's saying and think about the logic around
what's actually gonna happen here. What does he
really think is gonna be the outcome here?
They're gonna bomb their oils, then oil refineries,
and they're just gonna go, you got us?
We're done?
No. This will be a massive war involving
other nations that are nuclear armed. Not is
not Iran,
but Israel is, despite the lies.
He doesn't care, guys. He doesn't care about
you. He doesn't care about American interests. He
cares about his own interests.
Now, here's Biden.
This morning, VP and I convened our national
security team to discuss Iran's plans to launch
an imminent attack. This is before, obviously, they
launched yesterday.
We discussed how the United States is prepared
to help Israel defend. Well, that doesn't seem
to be the case at all, quite frankly,
but he that's what he's supposed to say.
And then she says, wait. So your plan
to unconditionally support Israel's rampage through the region
and genocide in Gaza of rejecting international efforts
towards ceasefire? Yeah. That is the plan.
Here's Richie Goldberg. Strike Tehran. Strike hard.
That's another US politician
openly calling for the US government to attack
a foreign government.
I just don't understand how how do we
not do you see Iranian government
entities standing up and saying, bomb Washington DC?
You there I've seen smaller examples throughout past
damn time frames.
I mean, like, I well, it's been a
long time. Give me an example of that.
You show me somebody because that's just as
belligerent. I I again, I wouldn't surprise me,
but you have to recognize who represents the
rabid
the danger to us all right now. The
US and Israel
are literally using diplomacy,
using the guise of ceasefires, using the guise
of some kind of an agreement to
drive war.
Iran, we'll get to in a second, responds
with some a a truly deescalative deescalatory
measure. That's why they were told it was
coming, and they just use it to push
further
Because they're not in. And what do you
think that's gonna show the Iranian government?
If all they're gonna do is take advantage
and drive harder, we might as well go
full blow because they're going to do that
anyway.
And there you go. They get what they
want. You realize how
think about how alarming that is. It for
the for everybody, including the Iranians.
This guy is my it blows my mind.
Joe Wilson. America stands with Israel.
One after another, all jammed into my time
feed and ever and APAC tracker showing you
how much they're making because Israel gives them
money.
Should be it should matter to you. They
give him $300,000.
Do you think that might influence what he
says? Why why are they able to be
funded by a foreign government anyway?
Representative David Gustaf says today and every day,
the Israel the United States stands with our
greatest ally. Yeah. They're committing genocide, and they're
murdering innocent people in Lebanon, but all these
people stand with them. Ask yourself why on
the same day they all felt the need
to stand up and express that support.
You know why, guys. You know why.
Somebody's pulling strings.
There's a reason that they know this is
uncomfortable. They know that most Americans are going
genocide, and they do it anyway.
Why? Because they have this position because of
Israel.
Sarah Huckabee. The evil forces of radical Islam
are attacking our closest ally. Oh, the evil
forces of radical Islam? Just the Iranian government
now?
I mean, you have to realize how ignorant
this is. As we know, as a matter
of fact, that they funded Hamas, and that
they funded people like the Saudi Arabian government
or all of the most radical elements of
Islam that they claim they're fighting. The moderate
rebels. How about ISIS and Al Qaeda in
general? But they want you to think they're
attacking the radical Islam. No. They're attacking the
groups that are at the very least, less
radical, which is why they went for the
other ones.
It's an easy academic point to look up.
They leaned into the people that were radical
because they were willing to be bought off.
If they could've bought off the Syrian government,
they would've. They didn't let that happen. So
they went to the people that were able
to be bought off, and they used them
to destabilize the government for their interests.
And they screamed freedom when they did
it. Well, they destroyed lives including your own,
including our militaries.
We must stand with Israel.
That's what she says. Representative Burgess Owens says,
praying for the people of Israel targeted indiscriminately
by Iranian missiles. Guys, these are all representatives
of the US government who are either too
stupid to know what's going on or just
don't care, or are completely supporting genocide and
are lying about it. That should be really
unnerving for people.
Matt gay Matt Gates. The terror raining down
on Israel is unjustified and unacceptable.
I mean, guys, we'll get to it in
2 seconds here. Military targets across the board
at while Israel is indiscriminately bombing Gaza as
we speak.
Or or Lebanon, Beirut, where there is no
hostages to be defending for. They're bombing civilian
locations.
DeSantis,
the attacks against Israel presented continuation and escalation
of Iran's decade. We should be asking why
both left and right, every side is all
blind and supporting Israel.
Should matter to you.
Senator Katie Boyd Britt, Israel, America stands with
you and your people. Isn't it so it's
like they're all trying to to to, you
know look at me, Israel. I am the
one. I support you more. That's what they're
all doing as American politicians.
We are pray we are praying with you
as the as you weather attacks from Iran
and the terrorists they back.
Roger Williams, praying for the people of Israel.
Now more than ever, we must stand strong.
We're like close ally.
Senator Christian Gillibrand, the United States stands ready
to help defend Israel.
How is it possible with what's been going
on?
Like, you have to realize that most Americans
see this, which is pretty clear by any
amount, any numbers, any polls,
And yet across the board, your politicians are
blindly
supporting
the most obvious genocide on the planet.
Senator John Corn, all in bold, sending prayers
to Israel today and every day. Texas stands
with you.
Tom Cotton. Remember Joe Biden and Kamala Harris
sent 1,000,000,000 in sanctions relief. No. They didn't.
They gave him money back. But Tom will
keep lying because that's what they do, because
that's the narrative for the political side. They
deliberately enriched this terrorist regime.
Congressman Nick Langworthy. The United States will always
stand with Israel. Right? Doesn't matter. Unconditional.
Commit genocide. We don't care. We'll stand with
you.
Mike Pompeo, Susan and I are praying for
the nation of Israel. Fortunately, most of these
attacks from Iran have been thwarted. Alright. That's
we'll get into that. Keith Keith, just classic.
The narrative being despite all the evidence your
eyes will show you that they did barely
got anything through. This is the same game
as always. As Iran is even saying, we
don't care. Lie to the world. You pretend
that you weren't hurt. That's fine. You know
what happened, and you know what's gonna happen
next. That's what their their message is right
now.
Make Eric mayor Eric Eric Adams. I'm praying
for Israel amid the news of the launch
of every single politician in the United States.
Senator Deb Fischer attacking Israel would be a
grave mistake. Iran should suffer serious consequences if
it follows through despite the fact that Israel
did it fir. Like, when they do it
well, I'll get I'll let the tweets explain
it. There's there are a lot of them
making that point.
Escalation to deescalation, good for Israel. Iran will
do it too. Nope. Bad for you.
It's just it's just childish.
Anybody who's actually being honest with themselves can
see how completely inconsistent all this
is. Nick Langworthy. The United States will always
stay with Israel. Oh, I think I had
that already. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene. Pray for
Israel. Under a lot of them, by the
way, I was posting this thing. Is this
what you're praying for? And just showing you
the the doctors, all of them including the
one that I think is most impactful, speaking
to what Israel is actually doing. Shredded children,
deliberately sniping them in the foreheads. These are
doctors from around the world telling you what
they're seeing. And people like Marjorie Taylor Greene
are either too dumb or too
too dumb to see it or blindly supporting
genocide.
Now here is
Harris. Kamala Harris pledges unwavering support for Israel,
October 1st.
So all those wanna pretend it's gonna be
gone with Kamala. No. Just the same as
the rest of them. They all support Israel.
They're all competing with each other to be
the most one that supports Israel. That's the
reality. That's scary.
But what's weird to me,
despite the fact that it's very obvious Trump
blindly supports Israel,
why hasn't he tweeted about it? In fact,
I wasn't able to find what true social,
but I couldn't search it as easy. I
looked for a long time. But you'll notice
and it could this by the way, this
just could be Twitter hiding that from you,
which is part of the that does happen.
I've done that in the past with Elon's
account for certain things that you can find
that weirdly don't pop up when you search
for them. You let's I think we all
know what's happening there. But
no no search for Israel for Donald Trump.
That's strange, isn't it? Why didn't Trump stand
up and say I support Israel? I don't
know. Find that interesting.
But here are some clips that he did
say. Now these are all recent.
And it's funny the way he walks this
line, which shows me that he recognizes
that people don't support Israel. So he's trying
to walk that line.
I'll end it when I start, or this
would've never happened if I was there. These
meaningless statements he loves to throw out which
really mean nothing.
But here's two examples of this. This is
what this is Trump around what's going on.
So if you thought for one second that
he was subtly showing you that he actually
doesn't agree with it, he does.
You know, you have to give Israel a
lot of credit for being able to protect
itself. You look at these forces, they shut
down almost 200 rockets today. Right. Now to
give them credit for defending themselves. Right? You
know, so what he's taking is the blind
air that Israel shot them all down. They
really didn't. They that won't get to it.
A lot of damage. And I know this
is going really long today, guys, but I
knew it would. I warned you in the
beginning.
But this is not the way,
anybody should have to live. So we're going
to,
Right. Anybody. So the Palestinians? Nah. We don't
care about them. Lebanese? Nah. We don't care
about them. Syria? Nah. I don't care about
them. But anybody, only Israel. Got it.
Obviously, be very involved in the Middle East.
This would have never happened. We did the
Abraham Accords.
I think everybody, including Iran, would have been
in the Abraham Accord. Okay. So from here
forward, he trails off into his it's Trump
the Trump show. Right? So we start off
going, this thing that happened in Israel defending
themselves, but I if I was there, it
wouldn't happen. Trump records and Israel owns a
card, and I I did this, and I
did that, and Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump.
That's what he does for the next 30
2 minutes. It's what he does. I mean,
it's just he's he's full of hubris.
And it's it doesn't make any sense when
he says half the time in this conversation.
But the point is what he's getting at,
he would support Israel,
Iran bad guy.
And then what's the other one? It was,
Which had this would have never happened. We
did the Abraham Accords. Oh, and and the
Abraham Accords, of course. Because me, I did
that. Even though it was a shocking failure.
They love to point at this, guys. All
it really did was get a few countries,
not even all of them, not even the
most important ones
to
align to to normalize
whatever that means with Israel.
Like, well, Egypt, for example, the people don't
want that. They don't still don't. That they're
rapidly anti Israel in Egypt.
Sisi was a regime change. They put a
puppet in place. Where's my favorite dictator?
Trump famously said.
And then they just normalized Israel. So all
it's it's fake. It's flimsy.
It's an illusion. It's paperwork. It didn't change
anything.
Then, of course, they tried to force in
other countries. The Sudan was a famous example
because they didn't change anything.
They just said, hey. You're a terrorist, but
if you work with Israel, we won't care.
Or alternatively, you were never a terrorist, but
we'll take that name away if you work
with Israel. That's it's just shockingly obvious. That's
what they tried to do. They tried to
muscle these groups in a the governments, mind
you, or put people in place for regime
change if they wouldn't to be there to
work with Israel. But Saudi Arabia is one
of the most important, and they now have
pushed back from it because of Palestine, or
at least that's what the one of the
narratives.
But the point is it ended up doing
nothing. It didn't do anything.
That's what he tried to call the deal
of the century on top of that. To
make the 2 stage solution, and all that
was was a fake deal
that enshrined the Israeli occupation. And they called
it a 2 stage solution.
None of it happened.
So my point is, all he can do
is point back to something that never even
actually materialized as somehow a success.
And that's where he trails off from when
he's supposed to be talking about the question.
I think everybody, including Iran, would have been
in the Abraham Accords. Not even close. Not
even close.
I'd taken over as president.
I believe I think even Iran would have
been in the Abraham Accords. Ultimately, it would
have been great for everybody, and you would
have had peace in the Middle East. Oh,
yes. That would happen. Right. So you have
some puppet leaders who claim to not care
about Israel.
Everybody else still does though. Like, you really
think that makes sense? And even on top
of that, what what do you the the
peace in the Middle East,
Israel continuing to take what it wants at
the expense of everybody else would not be
peace.
But he knows that. That's actually what he
wants.
We got 4 countries solved and very respected
countries, as you know. They were signed up.
And then,
when Biden took over, they'd had they haven't
signed one country. I would have had every
every country in the Middle East would have,
been signed up. It's just not true.
Just period. Many of them were like, f
no, no matter what. So he this is
what he does though. Had I been there,
the whole world would have changed, and we
would have done this in 40,000 times in
every other direction. All the he's just he's
hubris and hyperbolic. That's what he is. The
only question would be Iran, and I think
they would have, you know, for certain reasons,
I think they probably would have been there
too. It would have been peace in the
Middle East and said, this is just tearing
it apart. This has really been,
this has really been bad.
But, they have to finish that process. What
however it turns out, they have to finish
the process. This is,
a little bit Okay. So in case you
missed it,
he loves to be like, it would be
over if I was here. It would've been
let you think you have to finish the
process.
Like, that's a really gross way of describing
what's happening, the process. So let Israel finish
in case you missed it is what he's
saying.
So genocide.
Got it. But like, 2 kids fighting in
the school yard. Sometimes you have to just
sort of let it go a little bit.
Yeah. So we got a kindergartner. We got
a guy in in
in in senior high school. Yeah. Let him
duke it out. Let's see what happens. Now
equivalent meaning, like, militarily. Right? Because that's what
we're talking about. You got you have an
open air prison occupation
that has minimal resources because they've been put
in that position. And, yeah, just let him
keep murdering each other. It'll work
itself
out. Either this guy
is far more stupid than I ever gave
him credit for or he is trying to
play you. He's trying to convince you that
we just have to ignore it.
Which if that's no stupidity,
I mean, it's
sinister.
No. You're trying to play us to think
that this is somehow not our responsibility
while you have driven this into reality with
the weapons and the funding and the support
and the logistics and the intelligence. But no.
No. We'll just not let them deal with
it. We'll look over here.
Guys, that's crazy. I mean, that's absolutely crazy.
At this point, it is America's war.
And,
we'll see what happens. But Oh, yeah. But
we'll see what happens.
Really nonchalant.
Right? Well, I'll let it I'll let him
punch it out. We'll see what happens. Yeah.
The little old genocide. No big deal. That
that's really caused by a lack of respect
for the United States of America. This would
have never happened. Right. Israel would have never
happened October.
Israel would have never happened. I he didn't
mean to say that, by the way, but
I think that's funny. Yeah. But see, it's
not hubris at all. They just don't respect
me. And and and this is it wouldn't
happen. I was there. Said the United States.
What he's talking about is his presidency. Or
even if you wanna think the United States
is still hubris that they just don't have
respect for this country. Why? What he's trying
to say is military power. What he means
is if we are more militarily strong, that
they won't it's not true.
Never has that been the reality.
It just doesn't make sense. The strength to
pea peace through strength. It is a lie.
What it means now, you could argue that
by demonstrating that you have the power and
actually showing restraint, that I can agree with.
But that's not what they mean. They mean
murder, bomb, occupation, strength. That's what he sees
it as. He showed you for 4 years.
And it didn't work, did it? Did they
stop? No. Because what you're doing is you're
showing people that you don't respect anything. So
they better fight back.
7th never would have happened.
Russia never would have invaded
Ukraine. And for 4 years, they didn't. They
would have never invaded. We wouldn't have had
inflation. We wouldn't have had God. Not the
withdrawal because we were straw. We're the ones
that got it. It's just so lame. I
mean, again, from a nonpartisan perspective,
what you did in the COVID 19 there
was the worst thing in this economy. You
can't pretend like that wasn't your fault.
No. It's the economy, the pandemic, whatever. The
point is they play off each other back
and forth. They're all doing the same thing.
Your government push you in this position. Your
government drove Russia into that position. Your government
is responsible for supporting Israel. That's it.
You see how simple that is when you
break it down, when you pull back from
the partisan nonsense? Your government is what you
hold accountable.
Your government, which he is a part. Ready
to withdraw, but we wouldn't have had that,
horrible, most embarrassing day in the history of
our country. And a lot of other good
things would have happened. And right now, we
have a a world in chaos.
I always quote Viktor Orban because he's a
very respected tough guy. They say, he's a
tough guy. Well, I guess, they're all sort
of tough guys. But Viktor Orban said, if
Trump comes back, you won't have any wars.
You won't have any wars. I wonder gee.
That wasn't humorous at all. I'll put the
guy who said I'll do whatever. It's it's
just so stupid. If Trump comes back, there'll
be no wars.
He had 4 years. How'd that work out?
And, no, you already know the lie that
was there was obvious examples of how he
did and he clearly could have started and
tried to start more wars. The point was
he even said publicly recently, but I finished
them, but he didn't though. They didn't finish.
You what you meant was you continued them.
Why that's a boast? I don't know.
Here's another one.
This one's pretty upsetting because of the same
he said this last time too. He he's
the point is this one shows you his
hubris more than ever.
They try to poke him about the idea
that he didn't show strength when Iran attacked
last time. And it it wasn't. He he
they was meek. The response was clearly aimed
at PMU, which wasn't Iran, and it was
a sidestep.
And he also lied about how these people
I think they got killed. But watch him
downplay,
which was over a 100
traumatic brain injuries.
At last time he did this, those people
spoke up and were outraged.
There are people in the hospital, and he
was like, oh, they had some headaches.
Do you think Israel should retaliate,
to these missile attacks from Iran? But also,
do you believe that you should have been
tougher,
on Iran after they had launched ballistic missiles
in 2020,
on US forces in Iraq,
leaving more than a 100,
US soldiers injured?
Now, obviously, the question was the first point,
which he just jumps right over and talks
about himself for the whole time because that's
what he does. And it's easy to get
him all riled up that way, which is
why I think he had, you know, had
more of the effect in the debate. The
the point here clearly
is that
he's avoiding the question. I genuinely think that
because I think he knows that most people
generally don't want war. So instead of coming
out and playing it the way that, you
know, Israel wants to come out and say,
yes, I support it because Iran bad guy.
He just tries to walk it down a
little because he that's politically smart.
But everybody pretends that he says what they
want him to because that's how the game
works.
But what's funny is he jumps right over
the real question, right,
That basically,
should they respond?
And that's what I wanted to hear. Does
he think that they should? Because obviously, the
quest the answer is yes. There's no question
about it. He supports Israel no matter what.
Watch the way he responds.
So first of all, injured. What does injured
mean? Injured means you mean because they had
a headache because the bombs never hit the
fort?
They had traumatic brain injuries. Now look. They
could have been lying about that. Right?
But that was what was reported. So either
you're admitting they lied about the severity
to make it seem worse at the moment
because that is something they kinda wanted,
or you're downplaying that they were dramatically hurt,
dramatic brain injuries that can be
forever. Like, you'd have lasting forever problems.
But the reality is
they bombed the base, which is what they
said in the beginning. That now gets watered
down when they bond close to the base,
and then Trump knew that, and they got
the call, which I'll show you, which plays
into what just happened.
But remember that after that, we had a
series of weird random
helicopter crashes where marines kept dying. Oh, some
3 marines died here, and some of them
died over there. And it kept happening. And
I'm like, why is this weird? Now I
don't never was able to prove that. My
gut told me that they were trying to
hide the deaths by pretending there were some,
you know, training exercise over here. A couple
aircraft, it is everyone kept noticing it. What's
with all the aircraft? What's with all the
random training exercise killings?
That's what I think. You can decide for
yourself.
So just so you understand,
there was nobody ever tougher in Iraq.
They had no money with me. They would
have made any deal with me. I would
have had a deal made within literally, I
would have had a deal made within
one week aft I mean, there's nothing that
makes that make sense. It certainly could be,
and I don't know about it because behind
the scenes. That's why he's doing that because
nobody can prove otherwise.
But based on what was happening, it from
what I could sense, Iran was not falling
for his BS. To the election. They were
dying to make a deal. And when you
say not tough,
they had no money. They had no money
for Hamas. They had no no money All
she was talking about was your lack of
response around the bombing.
So he just lurches into other things he
did to Iran. Like, you fall for the
bait every time, man. Before Hezbollah.
And when we hit them,
they hit us, and they called us. And
they said we're And by that, he means
the illegal assassination of Soleimani under the guise
of diplomacy at an international airport.
A
glaring war crime. Going to shoot at your
fort, but we're not gonna hit it. So
in case you missed that, he's saying Iran
told them ahead of time, which we do
know, which was the point. And at the
time, they didn't want you to know that,
not really, because they wanted to seem like
they defended against the bad guy attack. It's
the same way they play all this. But
now because in his interest, he's letting that
out of the bag even though we already
kinda knew that, which was that they called
ahead and said this is gonna happen. Why?
Because they were trying to deescalate.
That's why I just tweeted out him earlier.
I'll show you in a minute. Iran is
clearly the adult in the room right now.
They are showing you that they're trying. That's
why they told them the attack was coming.
That's why the media was able to go,
it's coming soon.
You really think they're gonna tell you it's
coming when it's supposed to be some kind
of attack to get you back? We can't
be this stupid.
And if you were a truthful reporter, which
you're not, you would tell the following,
none of those
very accurate missiles hit our fort. They all
hit outside,
and there was nobody heard other than the
sound was loud. And some people said,
that hurt, and I'm I accept that.
That's a really silly answer. No. So they
went to the hospital or at least as
you told us
then. So you're either playing this both sides
and you lied about it then, and you're
trying to tell us the truth now because
it works for you now. However you wanna
look at it. The point is they reported
over a 100 traumatic brain injuries.
And him calling it headaches is pretty insulting
to the people that suffered. Why? Because of
their actions.
He did that. He assassinated a leader that
is not somebody who is a terrorist.
And then they responded,
and people were hurt because of it. And
then he said nothing happened. That should be
insulting. But the point,
they warned him.
Now, again, he could be lying about that,
but let's take it at face value because
it happened again. Now to be clear, I
do think that's what happened. I think he's
using this now because it just suits him
now. Back then, it was more important to
make it look like, like Israel's doing today,
that they were able to defend it and
see how weak Iran is. It's not what
happened. And we all knew it then. They
just lied. That's what they do. They lie.
As Sal de Agris points out, as we're
coming through all the politicians who blindly support
Israel, again, there is no red. There is
no blue. There is the state, and there
is you.
That's the reality, guys. We need to start
getting our minds around that. Whether you wanna
vote or not, recognize that there is just
the government.
Whether you vote 1 maybe you think 1
person in that position is better today than
tomorrow, but it's still your government. To keep
playing this left right game, it never ends
up changing anything. They use it against you.
Now, also, to show you before we get
into the next segment about Iran,
just recognize that this is as all of
our politicians,
left and right, are competing with each other
to blindly support Israel more,
here are a group of Jews protesting against
AIPAC, showing you that Israeli media, Israeli people
on the ground, a Israeli organizations,
or specifically Jewish organizations in this case, but
Israeli too, are calling this out around the
world.
Well, your politicians
attack you for not supporting the government that
we all call out, including their own people,
including Jews themselves.
That's in that case, I mean Israelis and
then Jews in general, which are not necessarily
Israelis. But it says today, rabbis, Jews, and
allies sat at the APAC offices.
That's the group primarily
controlling your politicians.
They are demanding APAC stop claiming to stand
for Jewish safety while supporting genocide of entire
people.
You just can't keep ignoring this, guys. That's
this is the game of anti Semitism. How
can you pretend
criticizing Israel is antisemitic when this group of
Jews is sitting there doing it right in
front of you? So under that new law,
they would be
criminally antisemitic.
Even though they're Jews themselves calling out the
state of Israel. You see how ridiculous that
is?
It's happening. Trump's gonna do it too. Here's
another example. Jewish Voice For Peace.
The Israeli government is employing the same genocidal
tactics in Lebanon that it unleashed in Gaza,
relentlessly bombing both while engaging in mass killing,
force displacement, and the destruction of cities and
villages.
Stop arming Israel.
Lebanon, Gaza, Syria, Yemen, bombing them all.
And there's a big thread you can read.
The point is just simply that they just
don't stop.
Multiple Jewish organizations in the world are calling
it out, including
holocaust survivors, including any number of high ranking
influential Jewish people in the world.
All of them.
Trying to get your attention, trying to tell
you
it's genocide. And they see it. It's not
in support of Jewish people, it's in the
support of the Israeli government
at the expense of everybody.
This is this is that point I was
briefly pointing out earlier.
Chief propagandist for the Israeli government. It says,
you don't negotiate with terror.
You destroy terror.
I mean, it even just sounds dumb saying
it out loud. And I said, are you
starting to see where the Bush war on
terror rhetoric actually came from?
Now if that's speaking to people that might
just now be discovering this. Obviously, if you're
watching the show or even paying attention at
all, you already know this.
But I said this it says this most
definitely did not start on October 7th, not
for Palestinians
or for Americans.
This is the same thing we're seeing now.
If you wonder why Trump and the rest
of them are all having the same Iran
aimed rhetoric, that's why. Because it's coming from
one place.
Let's talk about that.
Here is Politico.
This is new. This is from the 30th.
Netanyahu says this. Iran regime change will come
quote a lot sooner than people think.
How interesting. You know how long they've been
saying this? The point is though, they've really
been trying, and they've tried many times.
So if you know that, which is objectively
easy to prove, shouldn't we be asking that
again right now?
They don't want you to think that. They
want you to tell, we're fighting bad guy
stuff. But the point is that they manufacture
these decisions, these situations, in order to drive
their narrative.
And guess what? It's working.
1000 more US troops attack aircraft heading to
the Middle East.
Now, unfortunately, as she told me earlier, Orwell
in the chat, has her her family being
deployed to Israel. This is real, guys. This
is not some side thing. There are American
troops
being deployed
to Israel
right now.
That's where we are. For everybody out there
trying to scream about this world war that
or this, that's happening right now because of
Israel. Your American troops are deploying
to a foreign war on behalf of an
Israeli genocide.
You'd wanna hear you wanna talk about object
a conscientious
resistant or what is the term?
Conscientious observer? No. No. No. Conscientious, what's the
term? I don't wanna say it wrong. What's
the term in the chat? Give me the
term. What you know, what what do they
spoke with the term when they're,
giving a moral reason they don't wanna join
the war?
Now is the time for that.
Greg,
was it Greg
Greg Reese? No, not Greg Reese. That's the
info wars guy.
The the 4 the, military veteran. I was
just referencing earlier, I can't remember his name
now. He was the one pointed out. Most
of them are apparently observed, which I'm just
kinda hard to believe.
Objector? Was that was it really conscientious objector?
That doesn't sound right. But the point is,
if you're in the military or you're being
I mean, we're we're at the point where
they're discussing draft conversations. I mean, this is
getting outrageous.
It's been that way for a long time.
Not Brad Miller, but the other one, Greg
something I thought, Stoker maybe?
Any case, conscientious objector. Is that what I
said? Anyway, the point is clearly this is
happening. And if people in this chat right
now have family members being deployed to Israel,
as we all see a genocide being carried
out, there has to be something we can
do.
I mean, I'm doing everything I can on
this show and outside of this. Everyday.
I'm calling on all of you to stand
up and do what you can in your
lives to try to stop this from going
forward. Greg Stoker, thank you.
Now if you don't remember this stuff, you
I'm gonna play these for you. This is
not new.
The US government and and representatives of it
have been screening for regime change in Iran
again
for a really long time. I'm a I'm
just gonna play you 2 clips that I
think are important. This one is Rudy Giuliani.
Speaking, by the way, to the MEK,
I it's a terrorist organization. Even according to
the US government before the Clintons took them
off the list because they want them in
power. That's what the whole point is. So
now if you can stand back and recognize
they fund the moderate rebels and we're trying
to use them to overthrow the Syrian government
so they could put them in power, they're
they're backing a guy named Hadi to put
him in power in Yemen even though he's
a a absolute monster and he lives in
Riyadh. Like, they're the point is just like
with Hamas,
they will fund the radical elements to use
them for control. They don't care what it
does to the people. It's the same dynamic
here.
MEK was what they wanted to put in
power in Iran, even though that's a radical
group that is an actual cult that would
put people in a position of absolute deep
the people of Iran would suffer
more than they are now, but they don't
care as long as they have control. Happened
under the Shah the same way. The
Iranian people suffered.
The in the elitist US Israeli,
cult,
elitist circle
benefited wildly
like it always does in this circle. The
the elitist corporate kind of that that's what
benefits the rest of the people suffer. Of
course, when they wanna show you on the
news later in the year, they go, look
at this amazing area. Look at how great
it's doing. Well, you don't see all the
poverty of people starving to death in the
streets because we give it to all the
people that are working for US interests. Here's
Rudy Giuliani speaking at the MEK about how
their regime change is working.
You know how we can tell?
Iranians are selling their organs for food.
That's what he tells you, makes a good
regime change. Not a joke.
So now tell me that you're not a
serious threat.
It's the regime we're trying to overthrow sees
us as a threat. You are a threat.
It is a reality. The protests are getting
worse. I don't know when we're going to
overthrow them. It could be in a few
days, months, a couple of years, but it's
gonna happen.
They are going to be overthrown.
The people of Iran obviously have now had
enough.
Now aside from that last statement, which is
not true, what you need to understand what
he's saying is it's ongoing.
It may be now, tomorrow, next year, 10
years from now, meaning they've never stopped. It's
an ongoing effort to control the area, not
for the Iranian people because you can prove
that's not what they want, but for their
interest at the expense of the Iranian people.
Because listen to what he says next.
The sanctions are working.
The currency is
going to nothing.
They're where Russia was. They're where Poland was.
Meaning the sanctions are causing them to destabilize,
causing them to starve, which is what we
always tell you right there. We see signs
of young men and women saying, give me
some food. Right. We saw a sign of
a man trying to sell his internal organs
for 500 American dollars,
probably a fortune in Iran today.
This is truly pitiful.
These are the kinds of conditions that lead
to
successful
revolution.
Did you hear that?
There's no misunderstanding that. This is no. This
wasn't a publicly displayed this I don't this
was not meant to be roundly displayed.
He's speaking to a radical terrorist organization they
want in power, who's, by the way, he's
paid to be speaking here by the MEK.
And what he's saying is we have examples
that our sanctions are working. The money is
in the money is
no longer valuable.
They're starving.
Here's an example of an Iranian selling his
organs for food. This is what makes a
good revolution.
Guys, that should be written on his tombstone.
There's no misunderstanding that.
Probably a fortune in Iran today.
This is truly pitiful.
These are the kinds of conditions that lead
to
successful
revolution, and god willing, nonviolent revolution.
Right. Speaking to a radically violent organization and
speaking about how people are selling their organs
for food. But, you know, this is the
game about nonviolent. So sanctions are apparently nonviolent
despite what you just described. No. They're not.
Just because they're not kinetic violence, what you're
doing is psychological
on top of everything else. You are literally
starving to the death and claiming it's the
government's fault. Pompeo said the same thing.
Do what we say or your people will
starve because of you.
That's how they frame that. It's your fault
because you didn't do what you were told.
So they fund a radical element that will
do what it's told so it can have
power over everybody else. You know, until they
don't, they replace them later with somebody else
just like every other time.
Okay. Now here is one you've probably seen
a lot, but very relevant to the same
conversation.
Patrick Clawson at the Washington Institute, who is
telling you,
it's very hard to get the government to
war with Iran,
which we need an event to start that.
No war in the past, as plenty of
people have told you, has ever been started
without a false flag. Here he is
casually outlining that for you.
I frankly think And by the way, this
is a Washington think tank. It's Washington Institute,
very influential. What the Washington Institute For Near
East Paul's Policy.
These this what they do is they sit
around and they talk about things just like
this.
These people are wildly influential. There's many people
that's kind of
revolving door fluctuate in different government positions.
These people are influencing outcomes.
What they're telling you, what you're gonna listen
to is the outlining of how they need
to use psychological operations to force this into
a war for their interests,
rather for Israel, if you understand the dynamic.
Crisis
I frankly think that crisis initiation is really
tough.
And it's very hard for me to see
how the United States,
president can get us to war with Iran.
Which leads me to conclude that if in
fact compromise is not coming
that the traditional way of America gets to
war is what would be best for US
interest.
Some people might think that mister Roosevelt wanted
to get us into World War 2 as
David mentioned, you may recall we had to
wait for Pearl Harbor.
Some people might think mister Wilson wanted to
get us into World War 1, you may
recall he had to wait for the Lusitania
episode.
Some people might think that mister Johnson want
to send troops to Vietnam, you may recall
he had to wait for the Gulf of
Tonkin episode.
We didn't go to war with Spain until
the USS,
until the Maine exploded
and may I point out that mister Lincoln
did not feel he could call out the
Federal army until Fort Sumter was attacked, which
is why he ordered the commander Fort Sumter
to do exactly that thing which the South
Carolinians had said would cause an attack.
So if in fact the Iranians aren't gonna
compromise,
it would be best if somebody else started
the war.
But I would just like to suggest that,
one can combine other means of pressure with
sanctions.
I mentioned that explosion,
on August 17th.
We could step up the pressure.
I mean, look people, Iranian submarines periodically go
down. Someday one of them might not come
up. Who would know why?
We can do a variety of things if
we wish to increase the pressure. I'm not
advocating that but I'm just suggesting
that,
it it it it's this is not a
a either or proposition,
you know, it's just sanctions has to has
to succeed or other things.
We are in the game
of using covert means against the Iranians.
We we could get nastier that.
Now the question is,
are the Iranians in the game of using
covert methods against the United States? I would
argue yes. I think that's how this all
works.
But it's really easy to see the lack
of public example around that.
I mean that. Like, you really take a
step back and look at how many different
examples you have of the US government using
those kind of means that you just outlined,
whether Iran or anybody else. And I can
clearly show you responses in different ways, but
I the examples of the worldwide dynamic or
just between the US and Iran,
they're pretty thin bear
thread bear.
So think about that for a second and
ask yourself who is the real just like
this origin of Zionism terrorism in the east,
ask yourself where this is really stemming from.
That's not a good guy, bad guy point.
As always, I think all governments could lead
to this position if left with this power.
But nonetheless,
the reality is the current situation and we
have to be honest about that.
Now, Dave Smith points this out. And this
this is an excellent point as always, I
think he makes great points. Which is this
is just how in the world anybody, left
or right, pretends this all makes sense to
trust. He says, so we all know that
the the regime, the US, by the way,
lied about WMDs,
left and right, by the way, lied about
mass surveillance,
lied about the Afghan military, lied about Russiagate,
lied about the 100 laptop, lied about COVID
19, lied about the vaccine and everything else,
every war. I mean, really, like, legitimately going
back as far as you wanna look, just
everything.
They says they covered up a goddamn child
trafficking network, but I'm supposed to take them
at their word that Iran is trying to
assassinate Trump?
I'm not supposed to demand evidence for this
most convenient and unbelievable assertion from those lying
psychopaths?
I mean, it's just it seems really I
mean, it's the point is it's the same.
Most people of the conservatives and liberals and
people that see through the 2 party paradigm
are are very aware.
They're all lying to us, but people don't
know what else to do. The problem is
that the people that are on the conservative
liberal kind of extension of the 2 party
paradigm but see through it are get pulled
back into it by these screamers who don't
care about you or the actual agenda. They
care about their own interests. They care about
gaining something. They care about money from Israel.
They care about influence because the RNC is
suddenly backing their pocket. It doesn't who knows?
It's not about what you're fighting for. You
think you're fighting for the saving of this
country? They don't care about that.
They're lying about everything.
Pretend that we have to go to war
with Iran is not America first. Right? That's
not in the interest of whatever narrative you
wanna spin it as. It's not in the
some kind of a communist direction. It's not
in the interest of going to fascist direction.
It's just what your government wants to achieve
because Israel is influencing its outcome.
It's pretty simple.
Now I'll include what Muhammad Shahada did the
other day just because it's a great breakdown
of all the endless,
endless amount of lies that Israel's been caught,
even by its own media or corporate media
itself in the in the United States or
the UK, proving that they were lying about
just about everything they've done from the beginning
of this. It's important to make sure you
check this out. I'm retweet this.
It's so weird how this happens. Look.
That that's Twitter for you.
The like is gone even though I always
like and retraces, but I every time, no
matter what.
But that's what they do. They hide and
stuff.
But Alan McLeod,
pointing out all the lies we're just talking
about, here's one example of how they use
these people.
He says how x in quotes, which I
agree with, Israeli spies literally write the news
we read about Palestine,
weaving pro Israel propaganda into our news feeds.
A tale in 4 pics.
Axios, the big picture. It says Israeli officials
said their increasing attacks against Hezbollah are not
intended to lead to war, but are an
attempt to reach de escalation
through escalation.
Yeah. It's just dumb. It's like it's like
preemptive self defense. It is an oxymoron, and
it's insulting to your intelligence.
Then it says, US fears war with Lebanon,
but hopes Israel attacks push Hezbollah the deal.
Same article.
Barak Ravid, who you've seen before.
Over here it says under forward, Barak Ravid,
Haaretz' diplomatic correspondent and a unit a 200
alum.
Oh, right. So it's like saying former CIA.
It's the same it's unit a200. We keep
talking about this.
Everything we're talking about this over the carbon
9 on the comp frame, the influential dynamic,
the the influent the infiltration of US tech.
Include that article, the show. I keep saying
that the show that we did around this.
Israel's infiltration of US tech in light of
the Lebanon pager attack. It should be really
disconcerting for us to realize they have completely
influenced this may American tech or the around
the world using unit a200 influence in Silicon
Valley.
And the problem is that they whether it's
through Unit A200 influence or different programs where
they're infiltrating this stuff, mill as personnel or
the tech we field, it's everywhere.
Now this is where they try to conflate
this with you going, Jews run everything. I'm
not saying that. I'm talking about Zionists and
Israeli government.
But see you see how that ploy works
to get you people that are they're so
afraid and so sensitive to that claim that
they'll sense that you're making anything tangential and
go, I'm not gonna talk about that. You're
a racist. Which is my point from before.
Saying APAC influences politicians, I get called a
racist even though that's fundamentally the case.
So in this case, the obvious reality is
Zionism, which both, again, more Christian Zionists today
than is than Jewish Zionists
influencing this or Israeli government, which is doesn't
matter. You you they can say what they
want. I'm talking about the government. And unit
a200 is an intelligent entity. And the fact
that that is influencing all this stuff is
not a design it's not a lie. They're
telling you. But pointing it out somehow makes
you a racist.
If it was China, of course, it would
be un everybody you know what would happen,
or Russia, or anybody else.
It's foreign influence.
And then he just describes what unit 8200
really is. Clandestine operation, collecting signal intelligence, code
decryption,
military intelligence, counterintelligence.
That's what this is, guys.
The bottom line is this guy is the
one telling you about what Israel is doing.
Quite the objective reporter. And here he is.
Senior White House official. We're actively supporting defense
preparations and defensive attacks. This is what this
guy does. In parrots what he's told, calls
it journalism.
The squirrel points out before we get into
Lebanon and Iran and with the ongoing attacks.
Going back to Ger Galloway from 2006.
This is not new. So just like October
7th, they went all started that day. No.
It didn't. There wasn't a they broke a
ceasefire. No. They didn't. These are just blatant
lies that anyone with the brain and interested
looking into it, going back to even even
Israeli sources before this. That's not true, and
we all know that.
Galloway was breaking this down the last time.
2006
or well, the last major one, I think.
There's been many different skirt. The point is
that this has been occupied for a long
time.
And this was a major invasion of Lebanon
and Galloway spoke up and called this what
it was. You'll probably be shocked to see
how similar the conversation is.
Now is a man not known for sitting
on the fence. He passionately opposed the invasion
of Iraq and now he feels that Hezbollah
is justified
in attacking Israel. The respect MP for Bethnal
Green is in our Central London studio. A
very good evening a good morning rather to
you, mister Galloway. How do you justify your
support for Hezbollah and its leader, Sheikh Hassan
Nasrallah? Preposterous way to introduce an item and
what a preposterous first question.
24 years ago, on the day my daughter
was born and I've just celebrated her 24th
birthday,
I had to dash to the maternity hospital
to see her given birth
from a mass demonstration in London
against the Israeli invasion and occupation of Lebanon.
Israel has been invading and occupying Lebanon
all of my 24 year old daughter's life.
The Hezbollah
are a part of the Lebanese National Resistance
who are trying to drive having successfully driven
most Israelis from their land in 2,000,
Israel from the rest of their land, and
to get back those thousands of Lebanese prisoners
who were kidnapped
by Israel
under the terms of their illegal occupation of
Lebanon. Sound familiar?
That's what they do. Kidnapping innocent people under
the guise of they just this is what
they do. They just have different narratives. This
is the Israeli government. So what's important to
recognize is now we're dealing with the dynamic
where there are Lebanese civilians being held in
prisons in Israel, but there's not hostages in
Lebanon. Funny how things are now switched around,
but yet they're doing the same thing with
the same exact narrative. Funny how that works
out.
They're the criminal.
It's Israel that's invading
Lebanon. It's Israel that's attacking Lebanon,
not Lebanon that's attacking
Israel. You've just been carrying a report
of 10 Israeli soldiers
on the border
getting ready to invade Lebanon
and you ask us to mourn
that operation
as if it were some kind of war
crime.
Israel is invading
Lebanon and has killed
30 times
more Lebanese civilians
than have died in Israel. So it's you
who should be justifying
the evident bias
which is written on every line on your
face and is in every nuance of your
voice and is loaded in every question that
you ask.
Right. Now it goes on. It's worth watching.
For time, I'm gonna leave it there but
there's a bunch more where he goes back
and forth and, you know, it really does
rip her apart.
I mean, it's obvious. I mean, she's coming
from a very propagandized perspective. I mean, he's
simply pointing out this that's the game he's
the same thing we're seeing today. You're coming
from the perspective that, well, it's a terror
organ it's a terror attack. They killed them.
They're invading Lebanon.
So they invade the country and they fight
back and now they're terrorists because they killed
them? Well, yes. It's exactly what the US
government does right now in Syria or Iraq
or anywhere else. They're illegally occupying. But the
moment they do anything, it's all terrorism because
that's how you make this make sense.
It's terror you you're a good guy, everything
else bad terror. That's it. Right? Didn't you
just see your Naftali saying that? You don't
feel with terror, you fight terror.
It's it sounds stupid because you don't fight
terror. Right? Terror is a an idea. But
that's the whole point. War on terror means
you never end up it's it's an ongoing
agenda that never stops because there's always somebody
you can call a terrorist,
especially your enemies even when they're not.
Now Jimmy Carter in 2006 said Israel should
withdraw from all Lebanese territory, including Sheba Farms,
and release the Lebanese prisoners.
Yet, yesterday, prime minister Ehud Olmert rejected a
ceasefire. There will be no subs subs substantive
and permanent peace for any peoples in this
troubled region as long as Israel is violating
key UN resolutions,
nothing new there, by occupying Erblans and oppressing
the Palestinians.
Nothing changed.
Jimmy Carter speaking of back in 2 same
thing right now. Funny how this the more
it changes, the more it stays the same.
Right? The point is it never changes. It
just stays the same and they lie to
you different ways every day.
Now, these ones,
I'm gonna skip just because of time. But
ultimately, Matt Miller again with his evil stare,
I'm trying to tell you that Israel doesn't
escalate anything. Right? He says, is is anything
Israel has done last few weeks escalatory? And
he goes, woah. It's it's expanded, but it's
not escalatory.
Working himself into a pretzel, mental gymnastics, just
not to acknowledge that their obvious explosion of
this war into Lebanon based on
not expansion though. It's not it's not escalatory
because everything anybody else does, that's escalation. Israel,
just defending yourself.
It's it is actually very childish.
We all see it. We all feel it.
People that want to be on a certain
side just go with it. But you can't
continue to pretend that anything, even when Israel
attacks, they respond, is now still their terrorist
act. It's stupid.
And, again,
whatever semblance of tattered reputation they have left,
they're still destroying it. They're they're stepping it
on into the ground. They've lost their reputation.
Now they're lighting it on fire. They just
don't care how much they destroy to blindly
allow Israel to keep murdering children.
How do you possibly make sense of that?
They must be compromised in some way. I
don't know how to make sense of it.
Same thing, Jake Sullivan. Obviously, this is a
significant escalation by Iran, a significant event. Was
Israel and it says hold on. Was it,
let me see which one it was.
Oh, this is a short one. I think
I've got this right here.
Station in the region.
Obviously, this is a significant escalation by Iran,
a significant event, and it is equally significant
that we were able to step up with
with Israel
and create a situation in which, no one
was killed in this attack in. Okay. I'm
glad I include that. So the point is,
clearly,
it was only an escalation when Iran responded
to Israel's attack. Right? That's it. Nothing else
was escalatory. But of course, the re because
we were able to defend, that's why nobody
was killed. They they tried. They were indiscriminately
bombing everywhere, but we were able to stop
it. You know, all that is except for
the fact that they literally warned you it
was gonna happen and told you where it
would be. Right?
Same thing. That's exactly what happened before. They
pretended when Trump attacked. They they didn't do
that. We yeah. We defended him and we're
strong. Yet today, here's Trump going, no. They
told me and that's why.
Yep. It's the same thing. And we can
literally prove Iran let them know. That's why
I mean, do I need to piece it
together? They were able to go, it's coming
in an hour
because they told them. This wasn't some
inside intelligence. They got Ron literally told them
just like before because they were trying to
deescalate.
So that's what happened.
And
Thomas Massie just pushing back on this saying
he's saying we have to work with Israel
to make sure and he goes work with
Israel, excuse me? The constitution requires you work
with Congress.
So as always, another war spins out and
they're not going to congress to get approval.
Why? Because this does not mean anything.
Legally, it's supposed to. We're supposed to believe
that the cons the con congress is the
one that decides whether we go to war
and the voting and dynamic and considering what
their constituents want. Nope. Doesn't matter.
Whether that's because it never mattered or they
just don't care today, it's it's kind of
irrelevant. They're showing you that they don't believe
in what holds
whether it's the constitutional rights that you hold
or the idea of the constitution is what's
supposed to bind them. It doesn't matter. They
are a rogue state.
That's the reality. How else do we see
this? Whether it's Israel or the United States,
it's the same dynamic. Ryan Grim,
Laura Friedman saying well, just highlighting another one
of these representatives. Members of congress are lining
up to support Israel. Well, I just showed
you that. May god watch over Israel, what
we're seeing. Now Ryan Grim says Iranian attacks
are always brazen, and Hamas attacks brutal, and
Israel's limited and precise.
It's in it's in it's insulting.
Anybody who only reads the media coverage
would assume that 40,000 plus killed must be
Israelis, and yet,
exact opposite.
Right?
Per as far as I can tell, none
right now. But this is what we get.
O s I n t defender.
Iran has completely lost its mind.
But then look let's see what they said
about Israel. Oh, look. Hauntingly beautiful images of
tonight's Israeli attacks on Lebanon.
I mean, that's embarrassingly
embarrassingly one-sided.
Hauntingly beautiful while they're murdering civilians. But Iran's
lost its mind when it carries out a
deliberate focused attack where they allow them to
be it's just it's it is pretty sad.
Pretty sad.
Now Arnab Batran writes, one aspect of the
Lebanon story which I've seen mentioned nowhere,
but which is actually fundamental, is the fact
that the UN genocide convention states that a
legal obligation to prevent and punish genocide,
which none of them are doing, despite the
ruling from every inner everybody that has any
standing on this, they just ignore it. The
and then yet expect everybody else to be
bound by UN.
It's insulting.
We just we just went over 1.
Many UN resolutions going back 75 years that
they just don't care about. But they as
Elon Levy just recently did, what about this
UN resolution?
Like, they're supposed to be bound by it
while you just don't care.
It says it's article 1. It's number 1
of the convention which states, the contracting parties
confirm that genocide whether committed in time of
peace or in time of war is a
crime under international law which they undertake to
prevent and punish. Now realize,
within this, it makes clear that the the
the ruling factor on what is genocide
are groups like the ICJ and the ICC
and the United Nations.
So even if you disagree with that, that
is the reality. So when the US just
goes, we disagree. Well, that you don't get
to. Sorry. All you're doing is ignoring the
dynamic whether you think it's true or not.
Whether there's bias or not. You're just going,
nope.
And then holding everybody else to the same
standard
or a different standard. It says, and we
have, as per below, Israeli officials telling us,
telling you, the very reason that they're attacking
Lebanon
is because Hezbollah refused
to accept a deal whereby they'd agreed to
let Israel continue its genocide unimpeded.
Think about it.
And think about all the western declaration of
support for Israel's bombing and invasion of Lebanon
in that context. His point
is just this right here.
Israel decided to kill Nasrallah after he refused
to separate Lebanon from Gaza.
But they're actually arguing in all of this.
We have decided to kill Les Raul after
concluding that he will not agree
to any solution
that isn't tied to ending the war on
Gaza.
That's directly quoted from from,
many news locations, by the way. This one's
a Humanitarianist. This one is, Al Jazeera. I
think the other one's BBC. The point is
and this is quoting NBC.
They're claiming
we killed him when he refused
to make any deal unless we stop the
genocide in Gaza. A genocide which has been
ruled to be as such or at least
plausibly so in every possible way.
So what Arnand is saying
is that they murdered him because they would
not allow the genocide to continue.
Simple.
And that's supposed to be justifiable? Whether you
think he's a terrorist or not, which he
was not,
that's pretty disgusting.
All we should see right now is that
the US government
is not just accidentally,
kind of, they
are actively involved in a genocide.
Pretty crazy. Now don't forget this, which we
played before.
Times of Israel reported,
the prime minister's trip to New York,
supposedly for the United Nations, was, quote, part
of a diversion, that's their quote, so Nasrallah
would think he was safe.
Right? So you put you decide to murder
this man in extra just judicial assassination
because he would not
cave to you start to to you continuing
the genocide.
Then you use the UN and it's and
it's the United Nations decision
and the lie of a ceasefire, which is
the third part.
Floating the idea that, well, we're gonna do
a ceasefire so you're not at risk. To
allow him to let his guard down,
and then you murder him along with 100
of civilians. That makes I mean, everybody. They
they use the United Nations. They use the
entire body. They use the uni US and
its dynamic. They used everybody.
How is it possible these governments are allowing
these people to keep doing this?
I just same point. I don't know exactly
what it is, but we all there is
something.
This is making them look like fools. They're
showing the rest of the world that Israel
can literally commit genocide and then laugh about
it in your face, still can't do anything
about it. They can use you. They can
use what you think is sacred
and still do it and get away with
it. Nobody cares.
On top of that, remember, she writes, Biden
chose to support Israel's escalation in Lebanon
while pretending to back a ceasefire.
Politico. US officials quietly backed Israel's military push
against Hezbollah
while outwardly pretending we're working on a ceasefire.
And that's the other dynamic. The reason, apparently,
he let his guard down and went to
the meeting was because it was under the
guise that diplomacy was underway, then they murdered
him from the UN in that building,
along with hundreds of people in other buildings.
Because they didn't know exactly where he was.
They but that's my point. They bombed 6
buildings
and then didn't even say they got them
until after it was reported because they didn't
know because they're murdering people just in case.
The Baidab had knowingly supported every Israeli action
from regional escalation and invasion
to starvation and genocide in Gaza.
I'll play this real quick.
It's just there's some
statements coming from Tehran that they waited so
long after Hania was assassinated into Iran
because they received,
messages from the United States
that something will happen regarding
the ceasefire in Gaza, and this maybe will
give them a way of not responding to
Israel. And this did not happen.
To Jew. So what he's saying, which is
the reality, is that ultimately and what it
shows you who the adult in the room
is, they're lying and saying we we're gonna
get a cease fire. So Iran waited
and waited. And and then again and they
got he Nasrallah got assassinated. And they they
were bombing Lebanon. And so Iran was played
into thinking that they might actually not wanna
murder people for no reason.
And that and then eventually then that's why
they finally responded. Right? The point is that
we've seen this in multiple ways. It's also
been reported, like I just said, that that's
why Nasralla was there because they thought we
see what how does that show you? How
does that not show you that these people
are the ones that are at least leaning
into the hopeful idea that maybe we don't
have to keep this going? Sure doesn't sound
like terrorists to me.
The one that is forcing it in no
matter what does, but you can decide for
yourself.
Saudi Agra says there are no hostages in
Lebanon. Israel's invading Lebanon so extremist settlers can
steal their land. That's the truth.
Realize we're talking about illegal settlers in the
north, which is what they want to return,
that nobody believes should be there or have
a legal right to be there. That's the
way it is. Even the United States.
Now weirdly enough, or it shouldn't be surprising
at this point, Margaret says the US mediator
is in the Israeli army. No wonder they're
killing people in Lebanon. Guys, this is actually
ridiculous.
So the US mediator for Lebanon and Israel
is a member of the Israeli military.
A
g I you can see my this is
designed.
They're doing this on purpose.
Now same Siemens points out the IDF has
announced the invasion of Lebanon. Now this was
on the 30th.
Now this is about the ground invasion dynamic,
which, by the way, we reported
back back on 25th.
Israel confirms its ground invasion of Lebanon has
begun.
So just to understand, like, this is far,
far more obvious and do and deliberate. This
is not about some stopping Hamas, guys. They're
they're invading Lebanon.
And the the problem is that straight up
telling you that they're gonna continue to occupy
it. They're telling you that.
Mohammad Shehada points out that the 98th division
currently invading South Lebanon is one of their
most openly genocidal.
And it goes on. The the examples, these
are the people screaming about murder sing murdering
children, starving people, bombing. They're laughing about innocent
people dying.
This is the group they sent in. Do
you know why? Because this is torture. They're
using the same tactics they did in Gaza,
and they're simply going, who's the worst we
had over there? Who are the ones that
are laughing the most about killing children? Yeah.
You go. That's you.
You think that's by accident?
That's what the Israeli government is. Al MacLeod
points out, delete your subscription to the New
York Times. I cannot stress this enough.
It says, we absolutely need to escalate in
Iran. This is I should've put that before.
That's when I shoved further ahead. The point
is as we get Lindsey Graham and other
US representatives telling you we need war with
Iran, these people are driving you into destruction.
It's unreal.
Bret Stephens, opinion or not, that's New York
Times. They're telling you we need to escalate
with Iran?
God, that's just crazy to me.
Now Abby Martin points this out from BBC
saying Israel tells US its plans to launch
limited ground incursion.
Here we are again. Remember the remember what
that looks like? We showed you Rafa. Well,
here it is. This is what this is
their last limited incursion.
There's their Israeli flag they put up in
the rubble.
That's the point, guys. That's Rapha. It's destroyed.
It's gone.
But, you know, so funny how Kirby never
ended up telling you that it shifted into
the real one. It always was.
So as they're lying about it again, Kirby
and the rest are blindly,
actively supporting genocide.
This one actually blows my mind, even with
everything else.
So they're bombing Lebanon,
and the BBC has to cover it like
this. Quote, the bombs were everywhere.
Because clearly precise. Right?
The feeling this has the people fleeing
Lebanon air strikes.
That's deliberately meant to confuse people.
As it says, even down here, Twitter,
the article's title could be misleading. It should
instead be Israeli airstrikes in Lebanon. Duh. Really?
You think these BBC journalists don't know that?
That is a straight up deliberate effort to
manipulate you into thinking that Lebanon is bombing.
If not Lebanon, somewhere else.
Gosh. Unreal
how obvious it is. Glenn points this out.
Bernard Henry Levy says Israel is not invading
Lebanon. It's liberating it.
They just don't have any new material, guys.
It's the same old thing.
It's a historic moment, not only for Israelis,
but for Lebanese. No. No. It's only historic
for Zionist genocidal neo cons and everybody else.
Glenn says this is exactly what the same
individual said, him by the way, about the
invasion of Iraq.
We're not invading Iraq. We're liberating it. They
just don't have any new material.
Pro Israel fanatics and US interventionists always depict
the flattening of apartment buildings and killing of
huge numbers of civilians as liberating them.
And then this is one of the images
I used today, but you might be surprised
to find out that's actually Yemen.
So not only are they bombing I mean,
they're bombing everywhere now. Everywhere. In in the
you know, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon,
Gaza.
But the point is interesting here. He says
when it comes to bombing Yemeni oil depots,
Lebanon oil fields, or Russian gas pipelines like
Nord Stream, the bombing of which was said
to be the planet's single largest ever c
02 emission event, which, by the way, you
know my opinions on the lie around that.
But just to make their point from their
narrative, you know, sort of like COVID lying
from within their narrative or or
what's the what did I I didn't say
lying. It was the point I made before,
arguing from within their narrative. Right? The point
being that we're we're making a point using
their narrative, even though we know it's not
true to make a point for people that
believe it. Right? The point is, those were
the largest single one that North Stream, largest
single ever c o two event.
Saying when it comes to those, there's no
environmental concerns. We don't care. Sorta like the
people screaming about the environment using 14 masks
and 10 pairs of gloves every day during
COVID. Who cares?
Environmental concerns are for when Nigeria is building
a new oil refinery. Right? Or Uganda is
building a new oil pipeline. Or South Africa
wants to build a coal file power coal
fired power station to give black people access
to electricity.
Poor people should protect the environment at cost
of remaining fur poor forever.
Rich people should bomb it with reckless abandon
because they can. Nothing is greener than US
dollars. It's a great point. Now whether you
wanna make it about race or poverty, the
reality is obvious.
It only matters
when the ones we don't want doing it
do it. And usually, that does mean countries
when we wanna keep under our thumb. So
whether you think they should be building those
kind of energy processes or not, the point
is that's their choice.
Meanwhile,
military burn pits or your bombing of these
things around the world are causing so much
more of this thing you think you're fighting.
But let's not talk about that. Meanwhile,
Israel launches massive airstrike on Yemeni infrastructure
and oil locations in in one of the
most impoverished locations in the world. Why? Because
of US and Israeli occupation.
It all just comes back together. Now Iran,
as you already saw yesterday, has launched 100
of rockets as they're reporting. It's disputed on
how many as usual. They're saying dozens. Israel's
saying over 500.
Usually, somewhere in the middle. The at this
point, I'm leaning more toward the side of
less because of what we've seen. But either
way, they're claiming
to have stopped the law.
What's funny, it was first of all, Sarah
Abdallah points out, turns out dropping bombs on
Lebanon, Syria, and Palestine, and Yemen, and Iran
have consequences.
Yeah. You don't say. Here's Israel. This is
normal.
Every single one of these rockets is meant
to kill.
They're just really childish. The way it's just
funny, like, the more you see this flush
out,
they're just bad at this. They're lazy, they're
clumsy, they're out of touch with what people
actually feel and think and how they talk.
This isn't normal. Like, you're literally doing that
all over the world, but it's not normal
when it happens to you. Yeah. We get
the point. You're different. You're special.
Every single one of them meant to kill,
like, it's just a weird statement.
It's like terror tunnels. It's like, yeah. We
get it. Bombs are meant to kill, but
you wait. You you just make yourself look
cartoonish the way you always you know, you
get it.
The bottom line though
is we're gonna get to
they were aimed
verifiably at military targets.
Now that's not to say that they always
do that. For all you know, they never
do. This time, the point is they knew
the world was watching, and they're making a
clear point. You're bombing civilians because that's what
they do, and there's no way you can't
prove that right now. Then they respond to
hit military targets. And what do they have
to do? They have to manufacture narratives. They
have to screech about how it's bombing this
and bombing that when and then restrict people's
access. You're not allowed to show this. You
can't show these rockets launching. You can't show
where they hit it because they're trying to
manufacture a narrative.
Either way though, they've been bombing civilian infrastructure.
So even if they did, which doesn't seem
the evidence to back up, it would be
logically response based on what Israel says is
defense,
which I don't agree with. I draw that
line. You should not be aiming at civilians.
But what's hilariously stupid is they can sit
here and scream that we're allowed to do
it because they did, and then when they
respond, it's always terrorism.
Hassan Mafi says close footage of the impact
of an Iranian missile on occupied territories. Again,
occupied territories, which means they legal
The idea of occupied territories having a legal
right to arm resistance. That's the point.
Make sure I didn't miss one of those.
It doesn't look like it. Okay. So going
forward,
important first point.
Haaretz, Israeli media, reports the US says Iran
attack appears ineffective.
Navy destroyer shot down missiles from Iran. Israel's
army says a 180 missiles fired from the
barrage. IDF will continue striking. That appears ineffective.
It's just, you know, they're trying to make
it look like they did it. Neurons meek
and ineffectual. That's just not the case.
But I said, in my opinion, and this
was on the first, this was all by
design. Just like last time. Now, this is
even before I had all the information. This
is my opinion. Which is why they all
knew it was coming. It's just deductive logic,
guys. They don't they all they everyone knew
it was it's a in an hour. They
wouldn't know that if it wasn't told to
them. Now, I'm sure you could have intelligence
to serve. But the point is, it is
the case. We know that now, either way.
They were told. This was action meant
to truly deescalate
or give the opportunity for it.
And still, the US and Israel are so
small that they have to lean in harder.
Iran is the adult in the room, guys.
That's why it it they didn't they're ineffective,
and they failed, and Iran's gonna now Israel's
using it, and we're gonna fight back even
though it was ineffective. Like, they gave them
an opportunity to say they failed, and so
we're the winner, and let them pull back.
And show you who the small
hubris riddled the people that are
more concerned about their own perception, how the
world sees them, than actually their their people's
lives.
They gave them that. We'll let you pretend
you're the winner. Okay? Because that's what you
care about. And they still couldn't take it
because they don't want that. They want this
to continue. They're driving everybody else.
Now as Kim also said the same thing,
Iran notified the US, meaning this was like
their previous April showcasing. That's the one in
regard to the the last time when they
basically said it's coming and they warned them,
but we already talked about it. Merely a
show to retaliate for the Hamas and Hezbollah
assassination assassinations.
The question is whether or not Israel will
accept it, which they're already showing you they
won't.
Barak Ravid, same one we just talked about,
propagandist here.
So the senior Israeli official told me that
the warning
about the expected Iranian attack reached Israel this
afternoon. So even they were admitting on the
record that they were warned it was coming.
Are we really gonna pretend that Iran would
go, hey, Israel, we're gonna attack you?
And then you're gonna go
they're gonna frame that as them succeeding
or somehow Iran's weak because we stopped it.
They warned you,
and you told us that. And yet here
they are
Waiving that we won. We did it. Iran's
weak. That's what they're all doing right now.
It's very, very pathetic. According to him, it
is estimated that the attack will be carried
out in the next few hours, which is
why we all got that report.
Mayotte
says, in April, this is what Iran did.
Same point. Just so you have another video
example. This is Trump saying the same thing
in a different meet different point. Saying, when
I was president, we killed Soleimani, which was
just a horrifying war crime. Just like with
Nasal, the the Nasal, the guy is not
a terrorist.
In fact, he's a very beloved person in
the world outside of very specific corners of
it and says, the Iranians called us and
said we should respond. We would respond with
18 missiles to save face, but not a
single would hit you.
Today, he's saying that. Back then, they lied
to us. Or they lied then. He's lying
now. I mean, or or they told you
through then, lied now. It's up for you
to decide. The point is that's how this
always goes.
I believe it's the latter or whichever way
I said that. I believe Iran warned him.
Right? Because they wanted to know because they
wanted to deescalate and then he lied about
it then.
But I guess the one overlapping point that
makes me doubt that is the the TMI,
the the traumatic brain injuries, TBIs.
Again, it's hard it's hard to know. It's
all up in the air because we we
lied to about everything. You can decide for
yourselves. But here's what Marco Rubio said because
they know where this is going, right? They
know they got the warning. So Rubio does
not want you to think Iran's the adult
in the room. They're the ones actually de
escalating while you're all belligerent maniacs trying to
force this in. So what does he do?
He tries to get ahead of it. Knowing
the warning came out, he goes, a large
scale not symbolic
missile attack from Iranian regime against Israel. A
large scale Israeli retaliatory response inside Iran is
certain to follow.
That's just you can't these people are children.
Children with a lot of power and a
sociopathic desire to murder people. That's pretty scary.
But here's what Kim said. Now she's been
doing this in response to the come out
and give you the false, you know,
like like this. Large scale attack coming, Israel's
retaliatory response to follow. And she goes, Iran
conducted a large scale retaliatory response, not an
attack. I said, just flipping it back the
other way. Like, if you could you pretend
one's an attack, one's a response, well, guess
what? Here's a back at you. It's only
because you go Iran bad guy. But the
reality is, in fact, in this case, v
without question, because we're all paying attention,
they just attacked Iran just now. So Iran
is responding.
But you wanna make it out to be
theirs in attack and they're responding. It's just
it's just childish.
Elijah Manje says, Iran has escalated to deescalate.
Oh, yeah. Right? Isn't that what we just
were told? Isn't that the same thing? Can't
you make the same argument? Or is that
only allowed for some people?
Because you realize that's not unique to anybody.
You can say, I'm going to deescalate with
the interest you or I'm going to escalate
with the interest of deescalating.
Right? That's that's an illogical statement in my
mind. But nonetheless,
the point
is it would apply if it was actually
something that would make sense. But nope.
Israel says we're going to deescalate through escalation.
Israel the US goes, of course, we support
you. Iran says, oh, go cable do the
same thing. As you as US goes, no.
We meant only Israel. Only they can re
you get the game. It's it's insulting to
your intelligence.
Sarah Abdallah points out that as of the
later on the first, so after that, they
responded.
Right? So Iran sent missiles,
which I think I thought I had oh,
here we here's some of them. I think
I just I think I'm just rushing through.
I had the video showing the the missiles
launching. But again, this is from yesterday. The
point is coming through to today. But nonetheless,
the point is Iran launched rockets or missiles
at Tel Aviv.
Oh, no. I I am gonna get to
it. I have it right here.
Yeah. Sorry. I just have this little bit,
out of order. Now point is that on
the first,
they attacked Beirut
again.
Dropping bombs on Lebanon's capital in the middle
of the night, flattening at least 4 more
residential buildings packed with this Lebanese families.
And it's it's a constant, guys. I mean,
it's actually really crazy how easy this is
to prove right now. There are people filming
this. There are Lebanese people all around. This
is not Gaza. And yet your politicians are
still just blindly going along with this. There
is no legal justification here.
There's just by see, it feels crazy. Is
in Gaza,
you could try to flimsily make the argument
that there's, like, tunnels and human shields because
of the the dynamic. Even though it's still
legal, it didn't apply. But now you're talking
about
Beirut.
I mean, wherever you are in the world,
imagine that's your city. Right? That's Saint Petersburg.
That's Sacramento. That's Las Vegas. Whatever you are,
that's the main city, and they are bombing
major buildings under the guys that they say
you're holding people there or the tunnel or
something. They're not even trying to prove these.
Ask yourself how they could even know these
things right now. This is not Gaza.
It's just nobody seems to care. It's actually
wild to me. On top of everything else,
it still is. Now, Middle East observer points
out that in Iran,
again, this is kind of actually backward because
I'm gonna talk about the Iran launching them.
But to finish up here quickly, the point
is that they saw missiles flying from
Iran or from, from
excuse me. In Iran,
seeing missiles flying to Palestine.
Right? So what would this is meant to
highlight. Yes. This is frustrating. So I I
think what I did here, I moved these
around.
Yeah. It's okay. It's that you guys get
to it's the point is we just we
all know Iranian attack came from yesterday. I
wanna show you some examples of how they
hit military targets. It's a little bit out
of order. My point is that after Iran
attacked,
Israel responded. That's what Sarah was just showing
you bombing Beirut again. But on top of
that, on top of bombing Beirut in response,
even though they could've just let it lie,
they could've said Iran tried to attack and
they're so weak. We stopped them. But nope.
They're very childish and so they had to
get the last attack. So I bombed Beirut
again and murdered a bunch of civilians despite
Iran's attacks hitting specifically military targets, which many
of them did get through. And many of
them were they and both were warned publicly.
Either way, the point is
they bombed Gaza.
I mean, they they made a big show
of it. Right? They literally just, oh, yeah.
Then we're gonna murder people in Gaza. And
they did.
As Rami Abdul points out, this is on
the first.
In response to Iran's attack, the Israeli army
is retaliate retaliating against 100 of families in
Gaza.
The video recorded by a family under siege
in Israelis by Israeli forces in Khan Yunus,
you know, the safe zone, Shows heavy gunfire
directed at their homes. So not just even
bombings. They're shooting rapid gunfire, bombing missiles. A
woman can hit be heard screaming, help us.
We're dying.
It's just so it's just
so to try to rapidly end here,
the point is as even Glenn Greenwald's reporting,
even this person from, I think this is
what Washington post,
every one of the confirmed missile hits in
Israel has been documented here by by the
always thorough, he argues, Evan Hill, who I
believe is,
yeah, Washington Post,
and was aimed at an obvious legitimate military
target. Now, obviously,
more than anybody, I don't trust the corporate
media. But the point is that they even
the corporate media
is confirming that almost every single Iranian strike
in Israel was aimed at a legitimate military
target.
And yet, nonetheless, your politicians and Israeli politicians
are just screaming otherwise to the world.
Isn't that wild? Like, so even the corporate
media, all of the international entities, all of
the human rights groups, everybody is reporting generally
the same thing, except for the politicians who
have an interest in power.
And somehow people are acting like that makes
sense. We should listen to them
and consider it. But when you realize very
rapidly that the evidence is very clearly in
one direction, and all you're listening to is
politicians who are desperate to hide what they
just did, it's shocking to me that anybody
falls for this.
He says there's a fundamental difference between that
and flattening apartment buildings, UN buildings, schools, and
refugee camps.
Yes.
Obviously.
Now hope for for those that weren't able
to sit through almost 5 hours, unfortunately, you
missed that. But the point is to see
clearly that this is undeniable.
So clip this out if you're watching right
now. Make a point about the fact that
there are military targets that they're hitting. Pelham
points out these aren't hospitals, schools, or refugee
camps, or civilian homes.
This is hypersonic missiles targeting the Nevatim airbase
in Israel, which, by the way, is right
near a major central military installation.
And it says the f 35 fighter jets
and transport planes and radar systems that were
used to target hospitals, schools, or refugee camps
in civilian homes has been destroyed.
Because these are the locations they're bombing.
Objectively, you understand. Like, these are being proven.
Now Casey Wright just makes a point that
it's funny how the Iran is Iran is
striking military targets to such a degree that
most of the ones being reported about even
have their own specific regalia, like, you know,
spit like, to the location. The Iranian ballistic
military, they hit the Israeli Ortel Naf Air
Force Base, and it's just funny that he
just generally make it a point which you
can look into yourself that these locations even
have their own little signals or symbols, I
mean.
But the point here is Mensch Osen points
out that for those who don't know yet,
the Nevateem airbase is or was, because it
seems to be completely destroyed, where Israel has
been receiving American bombs that are killing civilians
in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen.
Yep.
And, yeah, this is the air base on
look at that.
Now
when you realize that they're bombing this base
that has been literally taking in the bombs
used to kill innocent people and they try
to screech about how that is indiscriminate bombing
civilian, you get why they're doing that. Because
they're being
they're losing.
And then what they do is respond to
indiscriminately bomb a bunch of tents in Gaza
while claiming they're the victim. Because these are
villains we're talking about here. The worst of
the worst.
Muhammad Jiata points out that even CNN was
forced to admit something we've been highlighting a
lot. I think the squirrel was the first
person that we that we highlighted pointing it
out. But the fact that their base I
mean, the entire concept of the Israeli colony
is a human shield dynamic.
US Intel view
that among the targets were Israeli airfields, but
also, and this is crucial, the headquarters of
Mas'ad, the the international intelligence service of Israel,
which is
inside
Tel Aviv. It's in the northern part of
Tel Aviv, but it's in the city. It's
in a densely populated area.
And, of course, the concern is if you're
firing even even though Iran might consider that
a military target, it is in a densely
populated city,
with civilians around it. And that's just one
more layer of escalation.
So I'm gonna grab really quickly. Well, so
all what he's talking about is what we've
showed you before.
The obvious reality that the base itself or
or most of its military installations are embedded
specifically around, like, densely civilian areas. Now the
argument you hear online is, well, they're not
doing it inside their homes, which, by the
way, you've never proven that either.
Just reck you recognize that. You're saying that
because they said that, but there's zero evidence
thus far. Doesn't mean they haven't done it.
But even the UN's previous investigation from past
wars came to the same conclusion. There's not
evidence you haven't proven that.
But the interesting part about this is here
Where was that one? There's an the most
recent article, it's gonna grab it really quickly.
Where was that? Maybe I didn't
Oh well.
Not the human shields, but I mean, Harrat's
literally just wrote an article about human shields
and Israel doing that. Let me do this.
Oh, that's that actual article there. Hold on.
That happens all the time. It's so weird.
Okay. So this is the article since I'm
gonna talk about that next.
Let's see if this pops up.
Which is crazy. Look at how many articles
there are about this. Israeli soldiers filmed using
the tinnies as in Gaza as human shields
as July 2nd. Israel uses human shields on
the battlefield as a war crime, August 15th.
These are all these are all arrests for
crying out loud. IDF uses gods and civilians
as human shields to inspect potentially. That's August
14th as well.
For 5th for 2 in 2 days, by
the way. But they just wrote a big
article about that. Dang it. Where was that?
I don't wanna waste more time. This is
a super long show right now. But in
any case, it's obvious. So even CNN is
reporting this. Now here's the article about it.
This is from her ex. Does the presence
of the IDF headquarters in Tel Aviv endanger
the city's population? What the article finds? Yes.
It does.
Here's the the graphic they use right here,
showing you that they're just jam packed in
this area.
That's what this IOF human shield dynamic is
discussing, same point.
Dan Cohen
says it turns out that Iran has the
most moral army in the world.
Here's what Jonathan Cook says. Israeli air strikes
on Lebanon kill over 500 people.
The BBC evening news dedicates 10 minutes.
Iranian air strikes on Israel, this is important,
no known victims.
No known victims.
Even though
Or, I mean, that's even according to Israel,
by the way.
Now, I guarantee they're gonna force something in
or even lie if they have to, but
right now,
after everything they're screaming about indiscriminate,
not a single death so far. It's the
last I checked.
The BBC Evening News dedicates its entire half
hour schedule.
500 people, barely anything.
Not it's just it's clear, the dynamic.
Now here is even from,
CBS.
7 people killed in Tel Aviv mass shooting,
which apparently, which we might talk about coming
up the next show seems to be Hamas
operation, by the way. Which, you know, my
opinion on the very I'm very skeptical about
how Israel might still be influencing through it.
But let's be clear, it certainly would not
be out of the realm of possibility for
Hamas to simply do that. Because that is
the reality of this background. That's being objective
about it. But just to be clear,
it's I I'm gonna ultimately, right now, what
it seems that they have claimed it,
but I haven't dug for far enough to
understand, in my opinion, how to flush it
out just yet. That's why I don't really
get into it yet. There's a lot to
talk about. But US and Israel officials said
there were no reports of Israeli civilian casualties
from the Iranian missile attack.
Very clear.
Very, very, very, very clear. Now here is
Eaton Fishinburger saying forget what they say about
Israel. This is what indiscriminate attacks look like.
Islamic Republic of Iran seeks to murder every
man, woman, and child. Showing you the bombing
without any context, mind you. And here's what
Janice says. If a Zionist lips are moving,
they're lying. Israeli Israel war, day 361,
no casualties reported from massive Iranian attack. That's
harrettes Israeli media.
Explain for me how that can all make
sense when they've killed 500 I mean, way
more than that now. They've hundreds of people
in those buildings they bombed, ongoing bombings during
this and after this. And right up to
this very moment, they're currently bombing in residential
areas, or at least before I went live.
And not a single attack, and all they
can do is screech about how we pray
for Israel. It's all they're under attack. How
is that possible without what we keep showing
you? Something is going on.
You know it. Everybody knows it.
Now,
doctor Eli David, of course, which I probably
would've caught if he hasn't blocked me because
these these people are terrified we're gonna call
them out. This is lit this just shows
you how
embarrassingly desperate they are.
Right? So he comes out and legitimate
it says,
Elon Musk. He tags him. This video is
reversed. These are Israeli interceptor missiles being launched.
He's trying to pretend, even though broadly been
exposed by hell, that everyone's telling that these
are Iranian missiles and that's very clearly what
happened. That they bombed them, they got through
with a whole bunch of them despite them
trying to pretend like they didn't work, even
though they warned, by the way.
And he's trying to go, no. It's reversed.
Poorly Lord Beeville says, breaking. Eli David published
the real footage. Israel repelled the Iranian attack
fully. Just look at how many intercepts were
fired. He's he's making fun of him. When
you read through it all, the point is
you get down to it. The guys are
saying look. He's like, you can see
the violence
of a missile birth before it flies back
to its launcher. Don't be confused by people
walking backwards. He's laughing. It's like, the guy's
a the guy's an idiot.
Like, you this is how stupid they think
you are or just how desperate they really
are. That if you like, if you go
when you if you look at the old
thread, the point is that you can see
all these examples
of of how ridiculous it is. You could
hear them talking to backwards. You can see
these things. There's a thousand reasons showing you
that all he did was reverse the video,
or rather what I think happened is somebody
sent him this, and he just used it
because that's what they do. Bottom line,
it's very easy to see was it this
one?
I mean, all the rest of them even
like, here's what's funny. Even let's just even
say David is telling the truth. He's not.
He's blood broadly lying.
Everybody else is using it the other way.
Elon Levy going, Help us, they're attacking us.
Well, then, I thought you just told us
that none got through. You know, it's just
it's just funny how they lie about everything.
Everything.
But here's Elon Levy,
and here's even Israel going, This is not
a science fiction movie. That's Israel right now.
Yeah. Because you're bombing foreign countries and occupying
foreign territory. But it says, can someone check
on the human rights organizations? Are they still
alive? Are they breathing?
He thinks he's so funny. And I said,
they are all watching Iran defend itself. Right?
They're all just going by the logic of
defending yourself
that you have been bleeding about for the
year, last year. Did that logic suddenly change
when you started attacking?
Whatever for.
It's just a really where the brain can
see how inconsistent this is.
Dan Cohen says Israel's most popular right wing
media personality and former m, member of Knesset,
Yinnon Magal, calls Iran's retaliatory strikes Gog and
Magog. Biblical enemies
prophesized
to wage an apocalyptic
battle against Israel and be defeated by the
messiah,
ushering in the end of days and a
third the third temple.
Israel is a lunatic state with nuclear weapons.
These are very influential people who are open
I mean, they're talking prophecy here, which calls
for the end of the west, mind you.
Realize that.
Alonzo points out, do not forget, Palestinians have
been under bombardment for 11 months. More than
that.
40,000 of them have been killed by bombs
like these. Whatever you hear from Western media,
this was yesterday,
whenever you hear about this horrible development, which
not a single person was killed according to
Israeli media,
Ask yourself, why did you not hear about
Palestinians?
Right?
How many times they were bombarding buildings and
hospitals or ending up we don't hear about
the pray for Palestine. Nope. Didn't hear any
of that.
Why?
You know why.
Paris Marks even, and we just showed you
BBC making the same point.
Just a visual representation.
Purple is has is is is real, yellow
is Hezbollah.
Point is,
Israel tax
shockingly outweigh
Hezbollah and almost entirely aimed at civilian locations,
bombing. I mean, it's it
hell of a lot more air strikes.
The point is, this is Israel's conflict.
It's it's this incredible Bloomberg visualize
visualization clearly showing what's actually going on. Despite
all the talk of the threat of Hezbollah
rockets hitting Israel, it's actually Israel that's consistently
firing far more rockets.
But nobody wants to hear the truth.
Now this is simply
I mean, we're super long.
I guess it doesn't matter, but I just
I'm getting tired as well.
This these are, interesting back and forth. It's
a 5 minute clip. I'll play it in
in one of the next shows. But it's
it's it's sad.
Sky News coming in and trying to go,
so you failed. Right? Iran's weak. And it's
just
they're just
embarrassingly
out either blind for Israel or that uninformed
as supposed journalists. And then she says, you
know, we got the Internet. Right? I mean,
we all see what really happened.
And same thing with Jacob Jake Jake Sullivan
Phillips, yeah. Jake Sullivan.
He's simply going. It looks like they stopped
all of them.
Not even remotely true. Here is an example
of what right we Wyatt Reed showing you
with missiles breaking through and bombing just very
clearly. Israel is intercepting less than 10% of
the missiles.
The quote, Iron Dome is a paper shell.
I've been saying that for a really long
time. Just to make you laugh real quick,
this guy goes, Iron Dome, be like
this is actually a real thing by the
way.
Guy just going through the motions. Right? TSA,
keeping you safe. It's just and you guys
if you are see, you have to make
sure you will look at this on the
podcast.
It is just the guy's like naughty not
even really doing it. Just kinda touching your
arms, pretending to pat you down. That's that's
the Iron Dome right now.
And Tiberias says there are reports Israel's threatening
to arrest any Israeli who post images or
videos of Iranian missiles striking
their locations.
I wonder why. Same thing here. This is
from the Times of Israel. The exact locations
of impacts and damage are barred from public
publication by the IDF sensors.
Why would that be?
Because they don't want you knowing what's actually
happening because they're losing. Well, now Israel on
top of that, again, like I just told
you, because their children
are replying another attack. Now this is as
of as of today, which they're already attacking,
so I don't know whether that means that
or some bigger response to make it seem
like they're winning.
But this is important to see, guys. This
is Netanyahu.
His hands are literally shaking as he reads
this report.
Here's it. This this one's actually better. You
can see it closer
without the without the words. Look at his
hands tremble, guys. His hands in his chest,
they're trembling.
Now, of course, you could maybe he's on
drugs, maybe he's tired, or whatever.
I frankly think that they know what's going
on. He knows he is bow about to
be
removed from power.
Now Greg Stoker, there's the one I was
referencing earlier, also points something out. This is
from the first. So he's saying flights for
today
from Tel Aviv to New York,
fully booked.
Just saying.
So it's interesting. 2 things. 1, they just
flee the location they claim is theirs. But
on top of that, realize that that's how
easy it is for these interlopers from New
York and around the world to claim that
they own parts of Palestine.
They get to fly away.
Or the settlers of the north are staying
in fancy hotels, while the rest of these
people in Gaza and Lebanon are fleeing for
their lives. Now even in Gaza, more more
particular, have nowhere to go.
Mossad,
on the first. As I said, just, you
know, casually
foreshadowing their war crimes.
Iran's largest power plant. This power plant produces
a total of about 2,880
megawatts of electricity. That's all it says.
Now, it's, truth. Sojaw says Iran is not
the nuclear threat in the Middle East. Israel's
demonet nuclear facilities have produced a rogue nuclear
weapons arsenal that remains unexpected. Remember, JFK was
opposed to it, then they killed him.
Now The Guardian reports the Middle East crisis
lives as US does not back strike on
Iran nuclear sites. Iran not looking for war.
That's interesting.
So, again, the US is coming out and
publicly saying that we do not support. Now
they'll probably support anyway, but it's interesting to
see that push in that divide. Now Kim
Iverson says well, GlobalEye reports Israel has decided
to respond harshly. That was 9 hours ago,
so that could be what they're doing now.
But she says it's ridiculous to think Israel.
A country of about 9,000,000 in the size
of New Jersey can take on Iran, a
nation of nearly 90,000,000 people and an endless
stockpile of weapons. They know they can. They
know they want Americans to fight the war
for them, and they know they can get
it because they fully infiltrated
every level of American government and propaganda machine.
It's not racist. She's talking about the Israeli
government. It's true.
And on top of that, this is as
of
5 o'clock,
October to sit from today.
Israel's bombs are falling near downtown Beirut.
Having failed to confront the resistance fighters at
the border, Israel was now unleashing hell on
Lebanese civilians
while they are asleep.
It's what they're doing.
That's nothing new.
Meanwhile,
remind me again, what was what was the
result of Iran's indiscriminate bombing? Oh, that's right.
Zero people being killed. Not because of their
ridiculous fake iron dome that didn't stop very
much, but because they were bombing military targets.
Now I guess I've seen I'm just getting
con we already went through that. I I'm
just getting
mixed up on here. So we the we
already went through the point about the Iran
the the military targets being specifically targeted unless
I'm somehow missing that. But the point was,
yeah, it's already been 5 hours. I feel
like I'm just blending this together. Bottom line
is as we can clearly see as I
think it was even Kim or or many
of others we reported on proving to you
that they're bombing nothing but military targets one
after another.
To finish, Middle East eye, Israeli commanders say
they have an opportunity to shape history in
southern Lebanon.
They're openly telling this.
They're saying we are going to control this
area.
And it's not just by politics, which by
in and of itself would be a violation
of their sovereignty, but they're doing that. But
they're telling you we're gonna take Lebanon.
Israeli settlers are now rallying to promote building
settlements in southern Lebanon.
They can't even return to their settlements in
the north after Hezbollah turned them into ghost
towns, and they think they can set foot
in Lebanon Lebanon locations, he's saying. The point
is, they're actively doing this. We already showed
you this. This is their post where they're
making Hebrew names for peep places in Lebanon.
And we are acting like we all can't
see this. It's obvious what's going on. The
movement for settlement in southern Lebanon is what
it's called right now, publicly.
Lastly, again from Ma'at saying,
all this territory is ours.
We have Ben Gavir who will carry it
out.
That's what this rabbi is saying. The founder
of the Temple Institute. The lead force behind
rebuilding the 3rd temple and the red heifers.
The prophecies.
It says now, what is special about Ben
Gavir?
That he has so much faith in him.
They're telling you, we are going to take
this territory.
Guess what he says? Soon to see greater
Israel.
From the Nile River to the Euphrates,
everything will be ours.
Egypt,
Jordan,
Syria,
all of ours. Ben Gavir, who will carry
it out.
That should be damn concerning.
Now we'll leave it there. One of the
longest, I think we've had longer before, but
I told you it would be long today.
So thank you for blasting it out.
Just so much obvious information around all this.
I just hope people out there maybe you're
new to this or, you know, this channel.
I mean,
just one thing to take away from this
is you just gotta be willing to question
myself,
left, right, everybody.
Every piece of information, you have to do
due diligence, you have to break it down.
And the reality is it's really not that
difficult to see. If you're not coming from
a partisan place, most of these things are
pretty transparent.
They're killing innocent people.
In fact, what's crazy about it is not
only they're doing that, they're telling you they're
doing that. They're making jokes about it. They're
making skits about it. They're having rallies about
it. Whether it's starvation or or I mean,
or or or posting TikTok videos of your
own genocidal actions.
Or members of the Knesset standing up and
literally telling you all of them are the
same, kill them all, or in Lebanon saying
there's no such thing as they're all Hezbollah
and telling you we all it's just all
right on the surface, and your government
knows that.
And not only are they allowing it to
continue, they're funding it, they're supporting it, they're
telling you it's a good thing.
We need to change that.
From the world perspective, from the US perspective,
wherever you're coming from, we obviously
need to change that. And pretending like we
can vote somebody in to do it when
both of them are both proudly supporting the
same thing, it shows you the illusion.
Help me change that.
I'm just so tired of seeing these people
suffer. And it's only gonna look look what
we just told you.
It's going to spread.
That's why they're saying globalize the end of
5. They're not talking about terrorism. They're saying,
make sure we change this from a global
perspective. If we don't stop it in Gaza,
it's going to expand and look at that.
Lebanon.
And then Egypt. And then more of Syria.
And then Jordan. And then on, on, on,
on. Because that is actually what's happening. Now,
let's just even say right there, maybe that'll
stop right there. Because that's the great original
project.
But what they ultimately say when you listen
to the prophetic discussion is the world. But
even if they don't think, that's why are
we okay with them taking more countries' territory?
That's what they are
and it's what they pretend everybody else is
doing.
Take a stand. Don't be cowed along by
the screams of racism. Stand up for what
you think is right, whether that's voting
or simply taking a moral stance on the
obvious genocide taking place. Find the courage
to fight for what you believe in. It's
never been a more important time. Thank you.
If you guys would like to support this
platform,
we definitely need your support. I'm gonna be
having some updates coming soon, by the way,
on on just some of the other things
that have been going on. I've just been
dragging my feet on even because it's just
it nothing's really changing that much other than
me just bleeding funds because of the ongoing
nonsense of these 4 different lawsuits.
But it doesn't seem to be going away.
I believe we're probably gonna get more. But
that's just one aspect. Frankly, I was just
talking with Derek about this. I just hate
even bringing this up because I'm not the
news. This shouldn't be what we're talking about.
It's it shouldn't be the reason you support
us because I'm being sued. It should be
because you believe in what we're doing and
you believe in the way we're doing it
and the objectivity we strive for. That's what
should matter. But I know it's important because
you just need to know why I'm you
know, why the show has been so intermittent
lately and what's been going on. I I
will be getting to more updates for you.
But just at the core of it all,
just know that I'm I'm going to keep
doing this
no matter what that looks like because you
guys believe in what we're doing and I
will make sure to return that. I will
never give up on what you're doing or
what you I've never I will never give
up on you guys because you've believed in
me, or us, and what we're doing in
general. So if you'd like to support us,
please drop those in the chat. There's lots
of links for you to do so.
But as always, the most important thing, share
the content.
Make clips of this, talk with your friends,
have discussions,
just talk about it. Break this stuff down
and you'll find quickly that it's not as
hard as it may look to see. So
thank you for being here, and as always,
I love you all.
Question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.