Well, one of the 4 principal functions of
the CIA is to gather intelligence and and
ideally forward it to the
the president, the users of information, the policy
makers, as they say. There are other functions,
however, some of them more legitimate than others.
1 is to run secret wars,
the covert action that's written and talked about
so much, like what's happening in Nicaragua today
from Honduras.
Another thing is to
disseminate propaganda to influence people's minds,
and this is a major function of the
CIA.
And,
unfortunately, of course, it overlaps
into the gathering of information. You you have
contact with a journalist,
you will give him true stories, you'll get
information from him, you'll also give him false
stories. Did you buy his confidence with true
stories? You buy his confidence and set him
up. We've seen this happen in, recently with
Jack Anderson, for example, who who has his
intelligence sources, and he has also admitted that
he's been set up by them. You know,
every 5th story just simply being false.
You also
work on their human
vulnerabilities
to recruit them in a classic sense to
make them your agent, so that you can
control what they do, so you don't have
to set them up, sort of, you know,
by by putting one over on them. So
you can say, here, plant this one next
Tuesday.
Can you do this with responsible
reporters? Yes. The church committee brought it out
in 1975,
and then Woodward and Bernstein put an article
in Rolling Stone
a couple of years later.
400 journalists
cooperating with the CIA,
including some of the biggest names in the
business.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent
news as we see it from the last
24 hours.
Wednesday, September 25, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
Follow-up today in regard to what's been going
on in Lebanon, the horrifying reality of what's
taking place. The ex the kind of extension,
the growth,
the mission creep, whatever you'd like to call
it. Reality being this was the plan from
the start, if you've been paying attention.
Unfortunately, we're gonna have to cover the horrors
that have been taking place there, but I
wanted to stand back and touch on this
story and highlight,
I guess, it's not something it's not a
new topic for what we discussed, but in
the context of these points today,
just the larger agenda around
the the Zionist agenda, the influence of our
government, and how you see all these different
agendas taking place. Now when for those that
because this is the focal point of today,
how obvious what's going on, it can seem
as if it's all around this one topic.
But realize, this is one element of a
larger thing that's been going on. Like, because
we can see and there is even people
that would argue, and there's I I disagree,
but there's points to be made about where
you could argue that it's United States government
using
Israel and Zionism or but the point being
is I think the evidence suggests the other
way around with APAC and the evidence of
our elections and so on. But either the
point I'm saying all that is that what
we can see around the world,
whatever your opinion, going back a really long
way, even before the
foundation of the illegal state of Israel,
you can see the influence of and and
a great point to make here. David Eich
and I had a conversation a while back
about Saboteanism
and how important that is as sort of
the argument
being that that is a foundational sort of
ideology
that spawned
3 things, Nazism,
Zionism, and communism.
And one of the foundational points of it
is that it was rooted in in in
infiltrating religions and political ideologies. And so it's
very clear that we can see this today.
And all that's to say that the thing
we'll discuss to start, which is around primarily
the continent of Africa, but just the regime
change concept that I see
kind of like a dying gas, like this
desperate, flailing
action to just throw governments out. Like, right
now, we've seen regime change go back a
long way, long before the beginning of the
US empire.
But we've seen it, at least in some
ways, in some tactful ways, trying to make
it a little bit more
con conspicuous
or inconspicuous. Excuse me. Today, it seems like
we can tell, like, with for obvious reasons
that these power structures are pretty desperate, and
they are reacting in ways that make their
actions very, very clear. And so I wanna
go over that in that and and this
is my opinion about why we see this
so clearly. You can decide for yourself. But
the point the facts are that we can
see clearly that the US government
is acting in regard to as, basically, beginning
regime change tactics in a lot of locations
around Africa as well as around the world.
And I think that's important for many different
reasons,
whether we're talking about Russia or China or
Israel or rare earth minerals or many different
factors, I think that this has to do
not just with the declining of Zionism, but
the the it coincides with that dwindling power
structure and what that then just
creates the necessities around that, but also the
larger agenda. The globalism concept, the the technocratic
panopticon is the easiest way to just say
that without going into all the the many
different facets of that conversation. And so I
think that this is important to begin with
so we can discuss,
you know, that it's happening and how ridiculous
it is, how illegal it is, and why
how that connects, but then the bigger point
being, these are the people that are supposed
to be the the rules based order, which,
you know,
that whole illusion is out the window even
though they're still trying to desperately hold on
to it. But they're the ones presenting themselves
as the the root the the
the sane minded ones, the the the ones
that will bring you into the the the
the future
and change your lives for the better. We're
only acting in the interest of the peoples.
We care about freedom and liberty and democracy.
These are all completely
obvious clumsy lies at this point. And so
what I wanna show you is that that
doesn't mean that the other side of that,
whatever you think that may be, is necessarily
the good to the bad, but that the
most important thing and this is the same
conversation about the illusion of our election right
now. Pointing out that they're both the same
thing or both just as bad and there's
not a lesser of anything in that conversation
does not then mean anything other than stating
that fact. I I'm sure I have I
have plenty of thoughts I could add to
that, but the assumption that you're then saying,
well, then you mean this, or what we
should do is that, or if you say
that, you mean I should vote for her.
That's the party that's the the manipulation of
our politics circumventing logic. We should be able
to identify a fact without then tagging along
a lot of narratives to it or
agendas.
The fact is the same, that those 2
are terrible.
They're both the same thing. And what we're
seeing around the world is the people presenting
themselves as the one fighting for the good
of the world are nothing of the kind.
And that alone has to be something we
acknowledge before we jump into other conversations.
So I wanna start with that and and
and some other important conversations around that. I
wanna make sure we talk about the
the importance of from that point about the
United Nations
and and not as a body, but the
the ruling around Palestine that recently happened and
many others before it. And just how what
this truly shows us about the
the illusion of that very point, rules based
order or illusion of authority in general. I'll
be interviewing, like, Larkin Rose tomorrow. Probably won't
it won't be live, but it'll be coming
out a couple either that day or day
after. I say that because his important book
is about that, the most dangerous superstition, the
illusion of authority, voting.
And so I wanna talk about how important
it is that that whole thing is out
the window at this point. No matter what
they keep saying, if they can just go,
well, we don't care what you all decide.
You can't just go back to the UN
tomorrow and say, oh, this new resolution means
Iran has to do what we say. Well,
that's that doesn't really it mean, never it
didn't really hold water before because of how
illegitimate most of these entities are. But today,
I mean, that that ship has sailed. So
what does that mean?
Again, there's lots of criticism around the body
of the UN. Obviously, Israel just simply says
it's Hamas, apparently, or how much you wanna
bet it'll be Hezbollah very soon. Either way,
it's important to see that that changes things.
At least the illusion of power to other
countries that may have at least let's just
even say other bad entities that may have
held back on certain things because they thought
there was some kind of a structure that
would care if they broke the law. It's
really interesting and it's worthy of point a
point to be made. And then, of course,
this brings us to Iran
and the conversation around, I mean, many factors
here. Obviously, this is all being driven from
Israel. It's not even up for debate. The
obvious nature of how the in immediacy of
the selection, the election, that all of a
sudden,
claim after claim of Iran trying to do
this and Iran's kind go after Trump. Not
not even the illusion of evidence. Not even
trying to give you something that proves anything.
Just going, well, this was what somebody said
and I'm pretty sure Iran bad guy. So
I mean, that's about the gist of it.
Now you can assume that this background conversation
is somehow intelligence, but how well has that
worked out for us? How often does US
intelligence give us the facts? That's why I
started with that clip because their job is
to misinform you.
Most obviously, whether we're talking about COVID 19
or foreign policy, the biggest misinformers
are the US government, are the agencies, whether
CIA and CDC or whatever you wanna talk
about. Of course, then we're gonna talk about
the conversation of how it relates to Trump
and that conversation
and that overlaps with Israel. And I wanna
start from there with Gaza and make sure
we don't miss some of the things that
have recently happened, but then the latter half
will be hopefully, in that part, it won't
take very long. I'll do my best, but
we wanna I wanna get into Lebanon
and finish the latter half today with what's
been going on, follow-up on the show we
just did around,
just the the cobbling together of the same
narrative. It's just Gaza 2.0 in regard to
what they were doing, like, the exact same
narrative which we all predicted would happen. And
going back to things they already said, This
wasn't some reaction to some event. They were
saying, we'll do this to you. We're gonna
we'll turn Beirut into Gaza. Mark my words.
And they were open about this months ago,
even stating this was part of the plan
from the very beginning. This is the point
as always if you just listen to what
some of the most belligerent high level aspects
of the Israeli government
say, it's they're telling you the opposite of
what Blinken still pretends is the case.
It's it's it's infuriating. One thing I was
noting on noting on before I went live
to myself, I really had to
do my do better to to not allow
this to become personal.
I've been really good about that in my
career and this in general. I've always been
I've always been able to sort of decouple
myself from what's going on. And stand sit
back and, you know, just disconnect from it
after I'm done. But this more than ever
has has made it it gets to
me. And it should. I mean, this is
horrifying stuff. I mean, it's not just the
bad things that are happening. That's that's worse
than anything. But the idea that these people
are, at least in the moment to moment
aspect, getting away with it. The Elon Levies
of the world, the Blinken's of the world,
the smug
morons that occurs. The the smug people out
there that will scream things, scream falsehoods in
a smug dismissive way, and then just and,
you know, bots will jump on top and
get and and the point is that at
the end of the day,
these people know that they are seen. It's
there's no way around it that anybody in
this position, the world around the vast, vast,
vast majority, more than I've ever seen a
visible majority in any topic I've ever covered,
sees what they're doing.
Sees that's this whole conversation we just had
about the rest of the world. No. No.
No. Europe, some of it, and the west,
part of it, believe Israel. The vast majority
of the rest of the world and all
of their they do not believe Israel is
doing the right thing. And so they know
they're in the wrong. They know it. And
I whether they're uncomfortable or not, I hope
they are, because they're sociopaths, probably not. But
they know that you see them. And so
it bothers me that they can just stand
there and act like they're giving you know,
and it shouldn't bother me,
especially because we can see them failing. But
it's the accountability
that's what I wanna see. I just had
to say that, so I shouldn't I'm taking
too long to open. So let's jump into
it. But I wanted to make sure we're
gonna go through the lies around Lebanon. The
obvious misinformation around how they're cobbling us together
which is where I was and the idea
that they're human shields, bombs under buildings, no
evidence, no verification, and then just just absolute
massacring of civilians. And the only thing you're
supposed to democracies are gonna scream about is
how bad Iran is and how we stand
with Israel.
It does. It it should bother us, but
let's work to not allow it to become
emotional because that is how they circumvent logic.
Now I wanna start today
with a,
a very positive note. That, Derek has been
traveling of t he's just getting back from
the summit of the future. We'll be doing
we're we're gonna be doing interview as we
always do on the stuff that he because
he he it's it's always important. Make sure
you're following Derek day to day anyway whether
it's about TLAB or not. Conscious resistance is
doing amazing work and he's he's he does
a great job getting in there, even just
covering the events but set catching people off
guard and kind of just not like, you
know, there's a lot of ambush journalism out
there. But that's not necessarily he just he's
just tactful about the way he finds himself
in a position where they happen to walk
by and go, hey. I got a couple
questions for you. You know, very very you
know, showing decor decorum but gets really good
work done. And so in this case, I'll
make sure you check out what he did
and what he was he he had a
couple interviews there.
Positive notes on that really quickly around the
summit of the future. I mean, ultimately, the
whole thing is a problem, but there was
a small step back in regard to the
emergency,
what was it? The I forget the term.
Check out the recent coverage we had on
TLab, but there was a part of it
that was removed, which to me only signals
that they don't want us to see where
it's going. But it is still a positive
step to show you that they that people
pushing back does make a difference.
Now while he was there, this this very
important
event happened that we've been covering for a
long time on this platform, Derek Derek even
further elsewhere.
And that is the fluoride lawsuit.
Now you will probably
not surprised to see that literally nobody in
the corporate media or the mainstream alternative media
for the most part were covering this.
Florida Action Network, you should follow, says we
are thrilled to announce that the court has
issued its opinion
on the lawsuit, and they've won.
Details to follow. And now they put this
out this and to check his account, there
should be probably details coming out today on
his account.
Either way,
I've still not I'm I'm all you know
me. I'm worried about the way this goes.
I'm I'm I'm only jaded and and pessimistic
in this world because that's what they've shown
us. I've just I learn. My whole life
has has shown me that that is how
these people operate and they do lie, you
know, either way, I hoping for the best,
expecting the worst. And I think with this,
it is a positive step. And again, same
point, shows you that we are having an
effect. That's a powerful thing to sit with
for a moment.
You, right there listening, you alone in your
room are having an effect on how this
came out.
Just sit with that. Think how I mean,
that's that not only is that whether it
even goes the way we don't want it
to, that moment alone
just this shouldn't be something we strive for
because it's not it's supposed to pat but
it I mean, it probably irks the hell
out of the social engineers out there that
they had to do this differently. So just
let that be a small win. But we're
not gonna stop.
And the point is that ultimately, this is
gonna have to go back to judge Cham,
I believe, and this will end up becoming,
some kind of a ruling in regard to
what this ultimately means, and they're gonna go
back. I mean, this will probably go on
for another period of time longer than we'd
expect because of the way the US government
operates. Nonetheless, what we know from this, and
I'll include the actual breakdown of Derek's, I
don't know, probably 15, 16 articles thus far,
started covering this long back before anybody even
knew it was happening, because he was in
in communication with Michael Conant from the Florida
Action Network,
is that ultimately this is dangerous. Not ultimately
it is. Period. Their own and we knew
that long before, but their own studies in
this, the actual study from the group that
they were working with, the NTP report, their
own government study who they tried to then
censor because of what it showed was very
clear. It's dangerous. It's a neurotoxin. It does
hurt you, and it and it does reduce
the IQ of children. Now the whole game
is about to what level, and this is
some the one we think is the point
is that within any context, you digest,
you ingest more than they claim is in
the water. It's in your toothpaste, it's in
your food, it is water you drink, it's
what when you're taking a shower, it's it's
all over the place.
But we've also proven that in many places
in the country, just in the water. It's
over where it should be. And even with
the study, but any is dangerous. This is
not something that should be in your water.
There is no benefit to this despite the
lies. So it's a positive thing to see
that these things are being locked back. But
we need to realize,
not to put a pass bad note on
the end of it, but this has been
going on for decades.
And your government knows it's bad. Your government's
known it's bad at the very least since
this lawsuit has started because they've been trying
to cover up the findings.
So they've been fighting to keep what's been
proven in court to be dangerous in your
water for your children and they're still gonna
keep it there right now. How long does
it take until this gets changed at all?
Right now your kids are drinking this water.
Anyway, the point is recognize what a win
it is but also recognize what it shows
you about who it is we're fighting.
Not the left. Not the right. It's your
government.
That doesn't mean anything about violence. It means
that these are the people that are there
that don't care about you. So what do
you think that means? Voting new ones in
place or something else? That's just the point.
Just highlighting the problem.
You guys can decide what solutions you wanna
take, but recognize what we're dealing with.
Oh, and I want to point this out
too. So Peter Sweden pointed this out. Whoever's
he he did good work during COVID. I
mean, I haven't really followed his account that
much, but he did some good, you know,
posting things about COVID and was critical of
that during the time. But my here here's
what he said about this.
No. So is nobody going to talk about
the UN pact for the future that they
just voted yesterday to implement?
Nobody was even told about this.
Well, Derek commented down there. Well, I said,
well, yeah, TLAB has been breaking this down
the entire time.
From the the law again, say just like
the fluoride discussion, Derek was breaking this down
from on TLAB and the conscious resistance to
I mean, he before anybody, as far as
I could tell, he was ringing this bell
and nobody liked it. I was like, what
is that about? This was months ago.
He's been on this since 2023.
If you think nobody told you about this,
maybe you should reflect on the scope of
the media you consume. Now, this isn't meant
to be an insult. I'm sure it'll be
taken that way. Everyone bristles. I mean, I
it's we get I I mean, even I
might if I didn't know where it was
coming from because of the way the ego
the the whole sphere is today.
The whole me is landscape is so toxic
right now, and that's by design. So I
get it. But I want didn't mean that
to be in any negative context, just to
point out that, look, it was there. So
if you didn't know that and this is
coming from an honest place, then go, well,
hold on. Maybe I should've been looking at
other things. And this, Sarah Westall chimed in.
Oh, by the way, I included the link
right there to one of his recent articles.
And she said, unfortunately, he's right that only
suppressed media, TLAB is suppressed, I agree with
that, is covering this. None of the major
outlets are. It should be a huge red
flag to stop consuming media that fails to
cover the most important developments in the world
and but it doesn't seem to register. I
agree completely. She nailed it. But I did
put I did say, but he didn't most
definitely, but he didn't say suppressed. It's not
what he said. He just said, nobody's gonna
talk about this. I think that's important. So
I said it's important to also point out
how many major accounts who see themselves as
independent media. That's not a slight. They just
that's they see themselves as part of this
something outside the mainstream or mainstream alternative media.
But how many are still somehow missing independent
media coverage of topics like this, since they're
largely still looking at mainstream media and mainstream
alternative media?
And, you maybe that's just because they don't
know it's there, but the point is still
the same. Food for thought. Think about that.
Take action to make sure, okay, there are
other platforms that are outside the controlled sphere
of even the mainstream alternative media. It's the
same trap we fall into with the mainstream
media. As you look and you think, well,
this is what there is. Even with mainstream,
there's other platforms that we don't talk about.
So instead, even the mainstream alternative media con
the kind of ecosphere,
you find the same kind of top channels,
almost all of which are half like a
half a step removed from the corporate media
or being funded by them or, you know,
it's just and we all know this. Now
that doesn't mean all of them are compromised.
We shouldn't just blindly assume that.
But so there are a ton, as you
know, which we're gonna be highlighting more with
the Independent Media Alliance.
People out there that just never get noticed
or risen up because they don't fall into
the paradigm.
And they're everywhere. And there has been a
lot of people talking about that. And I
simply said, and that should not be taken
as an insult or a slight, since we
are all fall victim to it at times.
More so some helpful insight as I see
it. Many like Derek were breaking this down,
but so few saw it due to the
controlled media structure, especially in the mainstream alternative
media.
And then, Indy News also followed up and
said lots, there are lots of other great,
craters who were covering this and included some.
So here it is for you. Thank you,
Indy Media, for pointing that out.
I'll include the fluoride trial breakdown. Make sure
you check that out as well. Oh, and
then one point just on kind of independent
media point of view.
Check this out.
Geo geopolitics and empire, who is part of
the alliance, says, look. Would you look at
that? Cobra commander Klaus Schwab is back, and
what do you know? Hanging out with Elon
Musk and Maloney
and others at the totally globalist Atlantic Council
Awards.
I mean, I don't I have no clue
how anybody on either side of the paradigm
can look at these kind of things and
go, no big deal. Like, if this was
Biden, it would be the same thing all
day long. We should care. The Atlantic Council
is a horrifying I mean, it's part of
the machine.
That's why I keep saying when he when
Elon just the other day made a point
about finding the machine, I said, you are
the machine, man. I said, guy? And somebody
was like, guy? What are you, 6 years
old? Those people are so funny. I'm just
I didn't try to you know, anyway, the
point is that these guys
are all part of the same thing. They're
sitting there with Klaus Schwab and world leaders
and
if you can't see by now these people
are not any part of a resistance or
outside or independent,
you just don't wanna see it. And if
you do see it but you're still feet
gravitating towards the people that are pretending that,
think about that for a second. At least
consider other views. Which maybe that's why you're
here. I hope so.
Now,
on the regime change point. Now, again, this
overlaps with with Elon Musk and the rest
of that same conversation because we just saw
the technocratic side of this with what happened
with Venezuela, what they were trying to do
with Haiti. I mean, it doesn't matter what
you think about the narratives around that.
The way that they conducted that from their
from their Twitter accounts or whatever else, which
they have a right to free speech, but
you realize there's a difference in the dynamic
when you're coming from the level that they're
at or the government side of it. I'm
not even necessarily pointing at Musk in that
context, but we have to know that that
is a static reality. If you're part of
the government, that changes your dynamic. If you're
a military
government contractor and a billionaire oligarch technocrat and
you're literally working alongside or and are basically
a tacit part or not tacit, but,
you know, about to be a part of
Trump's administration.
And then on top of that, the way
he was doing this with Venezuela and pushing
straight up government talking points from the US
government regime change narrative, we have to consider
how that plays out.
So all that's to be said, that what
we need to see is whether it's Kamala
Harris and Biden or Trump and Lev Musk
and RFK and all the rest of them,
all of this, your government in the United
States are part of the most obvious long
term
terrorism campaign that we could talk about today.
The ongoing regime change tactics in most cases,
for nothing other than desires. For what they
want, what they covet, what they need from
these countries, for their agendas at the expense
of literally everybody including you. If you can't
see that by now by looking back at
the history of just broken countries behind the
government screaming freedom, I don't again, you don't
want to see it. These are objective realities.
You know, like the US government funding, creating,
and working alongside ISIS and Al Qaeda. Again,
we should not be shying away from pointing
out obvious facts that you can prove.
Or lying about gassing in Syria. Like, these
don't then mean Assad Goodguy. You have to
realize that these things are still lies, though.
But going back to the point of Africa,
African Stream pointed this out. US congressman, this
is just about Nigeria,
calls to invade Nigeria.
Maybe you didn't hear this.
Africans everywhere have a responsibility, it says, to
defend Nigeria at this moment, which if you
don't know is a country in Africa.
And says, why so? Well, Nigeria is the
first African country to expel US African command,
AFRICOM,
and to forge a sovereign path with 2
neighbors. Now one thing you're gonna see a
lot right now, and this is my point
about the shifting dynamic which everyone loves to
frame as some kind of, like, a China
Russia ploy, which maybe it is, but realize
that people are tired of the the authoritarian
boot on their neck that it represents the
US government and the people that they work
with. Doesn't mean the other alternative is any
better. But, again, just understand
the fact that we're starting with. But the
point is that you're seeing resistance to things
like AFRICOM
or ECOWAS
or different organizations that are basically loose control
structures for these same powers. Now whether we're
talking about military like AFRICOM or a kind
of a a country alliance like with ECOWAS,
we're gonna talk about next, or others,
they don't always mean bad things. But the
point is, the reason these exist you know,
it's it's like a NATO or European Union.
Like, these things grow out of control
by the very same people trying to give
you the illusion of some kind of a
group power structure. Now what's funny about it
is that as they're bucking the idea of
a bricks or collaborative thing, which I'm just
as concerned or, you know, skeptical about, but
I just like I would can't hope the
best for Donald Trump, I'd be skeptical and
know he's done. So I know what these
countries have done, and I'm skeptical where it
goes, but I'm hoping for the best. Same
thing with everything. That's objectivity.
Right? Not one side or the other.
But
Oh, shoot. Where's I going with that? So
the point was,
oh, I lost
it. Shoot. I hate when I do that.
Anyway,
the point I was getting at is that
these these kind of acronyms, these, oh, that's
what it was. The the idea that you
can see them pushing back on that as
some kind of a problem, like a, you
know, the multipolar world versus whatever they claim
the US has done. I don't even know
why you pretend the what the US represents
is a positive in anything compared to anything.
But what's interesting is isn't that what the
US government's been doing this whole time with
these other government organizers
or like AFRICOM or ECOWAS or anything? It's
the same kind of thing. But it's funny
when it represents the other guys, you get
the point.
Whatever they do, it's bad. If they spread
freedom around the world legitimately, that's still terrorism
because it's being done by them. See? It's
just it's it's a childish mentality. But it
goes on to say, and to forge a
sovereign path with 2 neighbors.
Right? So Nigeria was the first to expel
Africa and then forge sovereign paths with Burkina
Faso, which we'll talk about, in Mali.
The 3 countries
recently ousted western aligned leaders and booted the
French military because most of these were, you
know, French occupied
colonies for a very, very long time, like,
right up until recently. And we'll point the
this by the way, these still exist. We're
gonna talk about one from the UK and,
like, a Cyprus point. Like, these these these
people screaming about democracy literally have, like, straight
up illegal well, you call it I would
call it an occupation, probably illegal. The point
is that because of how it began. But
today, they just kinda operate under a military
rule, and no one talks about it. But
we'll get to that. Now it says they
also make up the alliance of,
Sahal States Confederation.
This new anti imperialist bloc shares defense, economic,
and foreign policies and has agreed to issue
a joint passport.
Now why would anybody have a problem with
that? Because see the pro the only way
that you can end up making an issue
about this is if you go, uh-oh, that's
being done because they're secretly being manipulated by
this bad guy. Well, even then, that's not
your decision, US government, but the point is
that maybe what they try to say. Or
they could say, it's actually that they're all
terrorists, which is usually the route they take.
No. No. These aren't fighting for free. They're
all evil terrorist,
groups and and, you know, allude to some
connection with Iran or whatever.
But the point is all they're really doing
is saying, we don't want you involved in
our decision making anymore. We don't need you
to decide how we live, what we look
like, what we think, and what we're forced
to create.
So we would like to make our own
agreements with our own allies and come to
our own economic defense and foreign policies. But
no. The US government says, no.
We don't want that. But it screams democracy
as they destroy these things and take what
they want and put people in prison.
You know, and then leave with tatters of
the country like every other time. It's not
my my opinion. This is history. Now it
says in this clip from the recent episode
of This Week in Africa, they talk about
this.
And it says western powers not happy about
the revolutionary turn of events in Africa. For
example, in May, just a few months after
Nigeria tore up a military cooperation agreement with
the US, and a few weeks before the
US agreed to leave Nigeria, as well as
we'll get to the overlapping of Israel and
them bucking that entire thing,
Matt Gaetz literally stood up and called for
the US to invade
Nigeria. Now it's not just that that I
wanna play here. It's what he said when
he said it, and I'm gonna get to
the point about Trump as well. Like, this
overlaps with Lebanon. The idea that they're literally
targeting you oh, I mean, targeting might even
be generous. They're just literally carpet bombing civilian
locations.
But it it wouldn't surprise me if they
were targeting civilians.
It's what they do. But what's interesting to
me is that here, you'll hear Matt Gaetz
say, well, you push back. We'll target your
fam. We'll we'll go after your homes. That's
what he says. Paraphrasing.
Trump over here talking about Iran says, we'll
obliterate you. We'll we'll go after you. We'll
tear we'll destroy your entire cities or whatever.
The point is that that, no matter what
they did first, would still be a crime.
But they don't care because they're not following
the law. They're not bound by it in
their minds. They only apply that to people
that they don't like and usually lie about
them breaking the law because other entities, in
more cases, act within the law far more
than these countries because, one, they know it
doesn't work for them that way. But, 2,
you could I mean, I would argue that
they just simply are not the same level
of
villainy that we're staring at here. That does
not mean good guy. Every government in the
world, I have problems with. If you understand
my opinion, like anybody knows this show,
I think every government is bad because I
think government is the ultimate problem. And any
government left enough time and power would end
up just like the US government. That's my
genuine opinion, and I've said that from the
moment I ever started doing this show. But
people always love to frame it as you
said this, therefore you support them because that's
their binary way of thinking. Well, let's check
out what Matt Gates said here.
What a real US president would do say
that c one thirties are on their way
to Niger today with the water and the
medicine and the food our troops need, that
they will have a full fighter pilot escort
there. Oh, for their troops. See, you might
you might have, for a moment, thought he
meant for the people that need it. No.
No. No. Because they're they're they're not the
the troop the illegal action, they don't get
support. Oh, we need support. Oh, you don't
give it to them? Well, fine. Well, come
in there with our military, give them the
food they need to keep fighting you, and
then we'll blame you for it's just it's
the belligerence of these people. The idea that
they think that they have this right. They
love to stand up and say, we don't
wanna be the policeman of the world. And
then they force everybody through a butt of
a gun or a barrel of a gun
to acknowledge that they have that right. But
But they don't wanna say it out loud.
Remember Trump famously said, we don't wanna be
policeman of the world, then what did he
do? Remember he just even just recently said,
I didn't start new wars even though that's
not even accurate, but I ended them. But
that's not true either. But the point is,
yeah, you sure as hell kept the military
wars going.
And if the food our troops need, that
they will have a full fighter pilot escort
there. And if the Nigeria government or any
other third world
thug tries to even turn on their air
defense systems, we should show those leaders and
those thugs what the target package looks like
on their houses and On their houses. Their
family members. On their family members. What?
Okay. So even if you think let's just
even say for sake of conversation, which as
far as I can tell is not true.
That the Nigerian government is targeting civilian homes
somewhere.
Are we to pretend that that means that
the US government should then target their families'
homes to because they did it first? Are
you 6 years old? That's what they that's
what the US government does, what Israel does
everywhere. Well, they bombed us so we're gonna
murder their families. That and even though the
reality becomes they didn't even do that first.
That's what we're gonna talk about later. But
either way, what he's literally saying here is
that
we're gonna do this regardless of your sovereignty.
Try to shoot us down. Who gave you
the authority to do this? Why do you
think you have the authority to just force
your way into a country that doesn't do
what you say? Because that's how they see
themselves.
The illusion of the the democrat even pretending
even democracy is what we want. The illusion
of some kind of representative dynamic or that
these people care about freedom or liberty or
democracy or any of it is the illusion
of our time. They don't care. They are
the authoritarian
monarchy mindset. That's what they believe they are.
They just know that they have to represent
these things to maintain that kind of power.
For the time being, the United States has
lost that battle.
The United States military has officially all been
expelled from Niger. So they are no longer
in the airbase that he's referring to. It's
really important, obviously, that we defend Niger in
this moment. I think we need to be
super realistic.
What Niger has done is incredibly
bold. Like, if you don't kick out the
United States military and not face any consequence.
They see an opening. It's what I've been
talking about, guys. It's the moment. I I'm
not I I saw an opening for something
different action from the side of peoples of
their countries, right, like in the context of
Israel. But my point is the same moment
was there.
Peep these governments and and active peoples of
the world recognized a shift in the in
that in,
I mean, it it there's been multiple examples
of this. But what I was talking about
was the reality that people were suddenly seeing
things, calling things out that nobody had expected.
But what that then caused, or even at
the same time, was a diminish of power
for these same structures that have been holding
these people under their boot.
So
they exploited that moment.
What's funny about it is that, you know,
the same thing Elon Musk tweets out every
Thursday or whatever. More than once, I've seen
him do You know, all these all these
movies, you supported the resistance, but in real
life, you stand with the empire. It's like,
well, that's you, man. That's the whole point.
And as we literally see the most the
living embodiment of the of the empire literally
destroying the resistance or trying to, you guys
are standing with the empire. It's funny how
it's just the the the lack of self
awareness or just trying to represent the opposite
of what he knows people see in him,
that these people are the ones pushing back
against the authoritarians. It doesn't mean that they're
inherently good. That's not the way the world
works. But they are still in the right
in what they're doing. There's people that demand
that they have all their own self determination.
That doesn't happen. Right? It's not like the
United States is like, okay. You've given us
the boot. We respect that. There's no there's
no reality in which, you know, this isn't
something where the United States is going to
retaliate in some way or another. And so
I really, really want people like, if they
take nothing else away from this entire stream
to understand that, like, this is the time
to organize,
to defend the alliance of Sahel States. All
three countries, Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger. If
you're watching this from Kenya, if you're watching
this from Zimbabwe,
if you are, you know, watching this and
you're an African living in Japan, like, you
have to understand, like, this is a window
of opportunity
we've had for liberation that we haven't had
for decades.
And if we lose this, like, we're going
to be set back so far as a
people. And so wherever you are, like, this
is the time to really defend the alliance
of Sahel States.
It's just so inherently disgusting that we always
act like that's it's inherently bad. Right? If
they wanna do something that's different than whatever
western culture we're looking from, we somehow frame
it as backward and wrong and bad. It's
just so it's inherently disgusting.
And I don't I honestly don't think most
people feel like that. I'd like to believe
that we're better than that in general. But
too many people have been played by the
people out there who are presenting the lowest
common denominator,
the worst of humans of humans'
characteristics
as what we should be like. Like, somehow
it's praiseworthy to be crass and low minded
and racist and disgusting and just you know,
it's you could be however you want. That's
your right.
But framing this is somehow the right the
the way that, like, you're too afraid to
be this way. It's just small. These are
petty, small, cowardly people who are trying to
take control using you. You playing at your
lowest nature. Show them that you're better than
that. Now here's the point from Nigeria.
This is from 22 a while ago, but
this was when they cut ties with Israel.
Then recently, they were being, basically, the US
government and Israel were pressuring them
to reestablish
ties and they refused. So I think that's
one part of this. Now it's just even
in this conversation, I think it's far more
US interest, but it's important to highlight that
this plays a major role of what goes
on in US foreign policy. I'm gonna play
a clip for you in a second that
shows you that. It's just I mean, we're
we're gonna carry this into Iran because that's
the larger point. But you have to realize
that everything that's happening in US foreign policy,
everything has to do with something in some
way, if not entirely, that is an Israel
agenda.
That's not an opinion. It's very easy to
see. Now that doesn't mean they did it
for Israel. I think that is the case.
The point is that they did everything you've
seen them do going back to the, like,
I mean,
I don't know, the seventies. I I it's
it's hard for me because I only got
invested in this work,
I don't know. What was the exact year?
You know, what not that long ago.
So looking back things before that, it's really
just me doing research going back, which I
have done a lot in in times that
I started doing
this. My point in saying that is just
that I think that I'm much more attuned
to things that are currently happening and since
I've started doing this. But my point is
that ultimately,
you can see that going back. Like, to
me, it jumps to mind in things like
like,
Zviq Dubrzynski and the conversation of, like, the
balkanization of the Middle East. But
since the creation of Zion, over the of
Israel, of this, like, the illegal Zionist state,
I think we've seen a lot of stuff
shift in that direction. But nonetheless, the point
is that their foreign policy is Israel's foreign
policy. It's it's right on the record. I've
said this many times, and it you should
prove me wrong. The US government rather, the
two sides of the illusion of our US
government are aligned
in 2 always in 2 main things, which
is the war and pro and support for
Israel. We're almost always at war because of
Israel.
Look, it's very easy to prove. But so
Nigeria cuts ties with Israel and I think
that plays a factor. Here is what, what
is this? Ijeli Speaks and accounts on Twitter
points out the throttling down of his account,
he's claiming anyway, started after he started speaking
up against ECOWAS.
Planned invasion of the Republic of Nigeria, which
is it you these these are, that we
go into actually, in here it cited as
well. The point
is that this has been an ongoing,
dynamic.
Now ECOWAS,
the economic community of West African states, that's
what I was talking about,
is not what it appears to be. Sort
of like the AOS and the rest of
these groups that they love to create to
make it look like it's all about freedom
and democracy, and these are just simply co
opted ed. Like, even like the USAID and
any national down for democracy, these groups present
as some kind of humanitarian aid organizations.
And they do in some ways do these
things and people act these out because they
have to creep up that front. But at
the end of the day, as James Corbin
has covered many times or as he calls
it in one of the best shows around
this, it is simply a Trojan horse for
regime change. It's what they are. And even
they have stated this. Paraphrasing, they say something
like, we do today what the the CIA
used to do in clandestine fashion 50 years
ago. They openly stated that. So these groups
are created
for a
grouping of 4 of foreign countries to have
control. I mean, that's that's my opinion, but
I think that's what the facts show.
So he's pointing out that when he starts
highlighting that ECOWAS was discussing
regime change in Nigeria, he says ever since
he started pointing this out, it's gotten worse
over his post against the Gaza genocide. I
I like, you I who knows if he
is being threatened or not, but it wouldn't
surprise me that 100% is happening on this
platform largely re of regarding Gaza, but I
think it connects. I think it's about US
foreign policy of which Elon Musk is a
new technocratic part.
Now it says, if you're reading this, it
means you're one of the few who can
still submit posts.
Check it out. And then you should just
check out what he's talking about there. I
think it's important. Now here's what it says
under Ecooss on Wikipedia.
In 2024,
Nigeria, Burkina Faso, and Mali, interestingly, the same
three countries she was just pointing to, announced
their withdrawal from the block. The countries had
earlier been suspended from ECOWAS due to military
takeovers of their respective governments.
This is this is casually stated. They've early
been suspended. Why? Because the mili military take
so the point is, what they're really saying
is these countries
took back control of our countries. Now you
you can disagree with that. Look into the
background and realize that it's very obvious these
pretty much every comp every country in Africa
has been occupied long before the United States,
but the the that the game still exists
today. And then, of course, again, not good
guy, bad guy, but China steps in playing
the alternative role to this and says, here,
we'll give you a deal,
which I guarantee is dramatically in the benefit
of China, usually at the expense of everybody
else.
But it's an option. And they go, wow.
Okay. So US is saying, we'll take whatever
we want and you can shut up. Okay.
And then pretend maybe we get a benefit
here and there. But they're going, look. We'll
make a deal with you. You'll get this
and we'll give you that. What do you
think they're gonna choose?
Some level of autonomy. That's the point. So
here, all they're saying is they frame it
as their military's taken over. The point is
these got they stood up and said, we
don't want you controlling what we do anymore.
I think that's important to think about.
Now Pepe Escobar, who you should check out,
respect his work, says ECOWAS is a bloody
scam. Controlled by France, US UK and the
US, like all the rest of these, they
gave a 1 week ultimatum to Nigeria military.
This was in July of 2023
and threatened to invade
them. That's on top of the rotten EU
garden suspending money in security cooperation. So that's
another way, by the way, in a larger
conversation, the same thing they do with foreign
policy where they once they take over, they
force them to export
or really to, you know, produce only things
the US the the what the other countries
controlling them want, forces them to import whatever
they need from those countries. So at the
point and this is this is, like, part
of the whole confession of an economic hitman.
Well, it's more so about the the loans,
the money, but this is part of the
foreign policy dynamic where once they're in that
position, should they start going afoul of what
they want, they can pull that rug out.
Suddenly, you literally don't even have the infrastructure
to sustain what you need because you've been
importing it from the countries that now cut
you off. That's by
design. It's been talked about. It's been written
about many times. So when he's saying suspending
the money and security cooperation, I mean, this
represents the way that in many ways, that
rug being pulled. But I think in many
ways, these governments have been expecting
knowing they were gonna push back. So I
think same way Russia has tried to kinda
insulate itself to US sanctions and has largely
succeeded.
There's still you know, for how long it's
been going on, that's the point.
Now I pointed this out back on August
fur a second when Burkina Faso or WarWatch
highlighted that the president of the transition
of Burkina Faso wrote that there will be
no more exporting of gold to foreign countries
for processing. Burkina Faso's gold will be used
to back up the country's currency.
Right? Of course, as we all know, if
you wanna really get some, you know, regime
change democracy going, you you know, talk about
a gold backed currency.
But, obviously, you know, there's a lot more
going on today than just the gold backed
dynamic. But that does play a huge factor.
That undermines their sanctions control.
But I that's why if you don't remember,
we do this. I've I've only seen a
few other people do it, but it is
a good thing to do. You see something
that you're concerned about, like, that looks like
it could be problematic,
just hashtag regime change watch. Put it out
there, maybe nothing, but keep an eye on
it. Right? So we can remember this when
it comes up. We can search for this
hashtag, which by the way is why Twitter
is pushing back on hashtags because it allows
you to be able to comb through these
things much easier without just looking at what
they want you to see that day.
But there's a reason that this makes sense
because of all that's been going on, not
just gold.
K? Then on the September 20th September, which
I posted again.
This is from the president of Burkina Faso.
Same person. He says Africa doesn't need the
World Bank, the IMF, Europe, or America. And,
frankly, they don't. We have what it takes
to grow our economy without loans and refuse
to financial slaves. What's what's interesting is most
of these countries need Africa
desperately for many reasons, especially rare earth minerals.
The only way around, that that that you
should ask yourself why. They love to make
it again, some racist point about how they
just can't function. They don't know how to
take care of themselves. They're not educated. It's
not true. The point is these countries have
been suppressed by foreign powers
for centuries.
Long before the beginning of the United States
empire.
Because they take what they want from them
and they colonize them. And then they keep
them in poverty so that they can abuse
and take what they want and they can't
grow up and push back.
So the point is they need all this
stuff. They could self sustain everything that goes
on in these continents, they very much can
self sustain. Especially with the resources that are
valuable that they could actually sell for their
own benefit to foreign countries, but the US
and everybody else just takes what they want.
And that's why regime change watch, because it
seems very clear this is building.
Now, sa Saleh revolutionary soldier points out Burkina
Faso, prime minister, and this is back on
the, July 2024,
says, quote, we reject the neo colonial vision
of your organization.
Speaking of ECOWAS, he says, he warned that
Burkino Faso is watching closely, and if necessary,
will won't hesitate to leave both the African
Union, even the UN.
So this is the point about ECOWAS in
general. Just so you see that they're calling
them out. They see at least in their
minds, they see it as a representation of
all that's wrong with foreign policy.
He also points out the minister of security,
Sanna, announced and this is yesterday as of
September 24th. So technically, yeah. Yesterday.
So yesterday says on national TV
that people in Burkina Faso, the civilians and
soldiers living in particular in a specific location,
Cote d'Ivoire,
and Ghana, have tried several times
to destabilize
the institutions of FAFSA with the help of
foreign powers. So all and again, you could
take it for what you will. He could
be lying. It's always possible.
Objectively,
it makes perfect sense with what we've always
seen in this dynamic.
They push back, they don't want control, they
start making gold back currency, and suddenly,
there's protests.
Suddenly, there's revolution, and maybe we should never
decide we should never and this is what
a re an honest, objective person with integrity
will do. Even though you know this is
what US government does, you still stay back
and go. It could be a real revolution.
It could be people actually wanting change. In
some cases, they do use a real element
of that. Then they drive it into chaos.
And usually what happens is that real movement
peters out and then the the chaos continues.
But the point is that nonetheless, we know
that this is what they do. This is
their hallmark. Now suddenly, as of yesterday, he's
telling you that their inter their their neighbors
and even people within their country are beginning
to
seek the help of foreign powers to overthrow
them. And really, I argue it's the other
way around.
Sprinter points out, and this one's on August
1, 2023. Sorry. I could've put these in
better or time order. He says joint statement
by the heads of Burkina Faso in Mali
back in 2023. They said any military intervention
in Nigeria will be tantamount to a declaration
of war by the US, which they don't
care about. They'll frame them as terrorists and
do what they want. Also, he says the
head of Burkina Faso, the same person we
were referencing here before, says he banned the
export of uranium
to France, United States. So you see where
this goes.
This is the power they hold. Should they
recognize and and really, should they see the
actual possibility. Because if you stand up and
do this like she was saying earlier, you
get shut down. You get stepped on. You
get destroyed. You get put in your place
because these powers don't care about human rights.
They don't care about your the legalities.
They'll just frame it however they want because
they control the structure.
The point though is that uranium and the
gold and every all of the other rare
earth minerals, lithium and cobalt are monumentally important.
I mean, let's not forget this, the continent
of Africa. Even the the Israel's
primary source of it were large or the
the blood diamond field, their their entire industry,
which is a huge part of it, which
is explicitly
blood diamonds, which you can eat. There's been
so many articles written about that and nobody
cares. These things When these things get cut
off for these con these governments, it's very
problematic.
And that's why they can't allow this. The
summit of African countries, plus Russia and Saint
Petersburg was excellent, Sprinter says.
Now, Jackson Hinkle also points out, the cut
and this is back from,
where was this? January of 2024.
At the time, and still to this point,
the countries that were supporting South Africa's claim
of genocide against Israel. Now you'll note some
very obvious inclusions. Now first, just note, as
right now they love to be like, look
at all these look at the rest of
the world supports Israel. Really?
Not really. It's actually shockingly the opposite, but
it's admit they lie about everything. That's what
they do. But the the country is denying
claims of Israeli genocide, the United States, the
United Kingdom. Even most of Europe at that
point was really quiet about what was going
on. But even today, they kinda,
you know, they clearly, they will,
for whatever reason, still support the ongoing genocide,
but act like they push back against certain
actions.
Either way, the vast, vast, vast majority of
the world sees what's happening. But I wanted
to point out in this context well, obviously,
Venezuela, just so you recognize that. But the
ones we were just discussing,
I had it highlighted, but let's see. Mali.
Right there. Mali. There's Nigeria.
And Burkina Faso. So I just wanna point
this out. So there's obvious different reasons for
this, but I very much think that the
Israel overlap is important to this conversation.
Now, also, as Casey Wright points out, Bloomberg,
for whatever reason, has done no more than
no fewer than 15 articles
about Zambia just in the past month. So
see my point? There's something building here. And
I think it has to do more so
with just the continent of Africa and control
over many different things, or at least important
dynamics within it. Zambia has a plan to
drop the dollar and has implemented a gold
backed currency called zig. See, this this they're
losing control of everything.
All over the place. That's, again, what I'll
point out in a moment about Honduras, why
I think they were able to take back
control of the government from the coup that
allowed the
zedie
fake techno fake libertarian
technocratic control area that's clearly a part of
a larger agenda, which I'm gonna do more
on around Trump's freedom cities, this weird overlap.
There's very alarming discussions going on there that
is exactly what you think it is. But
the point here is that clearly, this is
important. All these countries are exploiting this opening
and it's this is going to get interesting
to see how they respond to this.
Now it says and he's pointing out the
same things. A coup of some type is
almost certainly in the works.
Now I will get this I to get
into this now would take up the rest
of the show, but I'm gonna come back
to this in a and hopefully tomorrow or
the next day in one of these next
shows.
On top of that, and again, this is
about this discussion right here which I went
over in-depth.
I really hope you'll take the time to
watch this show entirely, it's important. There's something
about this that's a very po I just
I know it in my bones, to
the next step of what's coming. The technocratic
regime change, under the guise of freedom technocrats,
are slowly taking control. This has to do
with this fake libertarian city called Prospera, which
is just a basically illegal occupation using an
illegal coup regime to just sign a contract
that has signed over the sovereignty of this
location in Honduras, which they don't. And and
even even at that time, they still had
to
expel people from the court system and put
them in place to make them vote the
way they wanted to. It's it's all criminal
from top to bottom. And now they're even
expanding. Crawfish rock apparently is gonna be absorbed
into this it's crazy what's happening. And now
they're suing the government of Honduras because they're
claiming they're violating the contract even though it
was a literal military regime change and an
illegal contract that they didn't even meet it
seems,
for $11,000,000,000.
The entire GDP of Honduras is like $35,000,000,000.
If they win, that's what I'm worried about.
Even right now, I'm worried about what that
looks like. That's an over I mean, even
with the Freedom City point from Trump in
his articles, they use Prospera as a reference.
They're using Bitcoin to back this that literally
Starlink is being allowed only for this it's
so crazy, these overlaps. Now again, I I'll
get into it in the next show. But
the point,
here's Honduras.
Recent post.
Honduras stands up for Palestine, which is not
new. They already pulled their ambassadors. They've been
screaming about what they're doing in Gaza. They
know they're they're a part of this the
they're on the right side of history with
this. The foreign minister has stated that Honduras
will not return its envoys to Israel until
a cease fire is achieved.
He confirmed the decision reflects the country's stance
and concern about the situation in Gaza.
And I included that regime change watch
as well as wanted to reiterate this point.
Remember, this is the current leadership in Honduras.
And she just said on September 3rd,
she said the same dark internal and external
forces of 2009, which is an Israeli US
backed coup in Honduras, which allowed this fake
libertarian city, which is actually a technocratic overtake
of the country to be established.
That's the it's
I've proved this in the show.
She's saying the same entities that did that
in 2009
with the complicity
of the national international corporate media, are right
now reorganizing in our country to state a
new coup. So Mali, Burkina Faso,
Niger,
Honduras,
which is, you know, obviously not in Africa,
but the point is what we're discussing today,
on top and Zambia. I mean, really, we
could go into more about South Africa in
general or excuse me, South America in general.
And there's plenty of examples,
or all over the world for that matter,
of this kind of thing taking place, All
of which is for the explicit interest of
the empire at the expense of the peoples
there and to you. Whether you're in America,
when you're not in Europe, it doesn't matter.
This is going to come back and hurt
you.
And in many cases, they're using your tax
dollars to do it.
Now here's a new statement that she put
out
today.
As president of Honduras,
my first action was to
call out
and condemn the genocide against the Palestinian people.
Already, more than
40,000
innocent people
have been murdered
by bombing.
And in response to that,
some countries have remained silent.
I also must raise my voice
and call for an end to this genocide.
Lebanon
must not become another Gaza strip.
Yes.
And we're getting to that.
Oh, wait. I'll make sure I didn't miss
that.
So clearly, that's not gonna sit well with
the people
who want them to fall in line. Right?
See them as vassal states to the United
States. Oh, Sarah Abdallah just said, at the
UN today, the president of Honduras accused Israel
of committing genocide against the Palestinian people.
Now what we're gonna we're gonna I have
some other clips from the UN, by the
way, we're gonna play. Of course, at the
same time when you're having all these scathing
statements, you know, you get the the same
old technocrats out there who you know I'm
sure you know I'm talking about, who play
the clips of some people that they love
to misrepresent.
Right? Clips that are really applied to all
of our government. They go back long before
the Biden administration that apply to left and
right doing the same things around the world,
censoring people on their platforms, including Twitter then
and now. But, of course, they love to
make it out to be how it's a
scathing indictment of Biden's administration because that's all
they can do. And usually, the people that
are literally part of that agenda love to
frame it as look at what we're pointing
out, which tricks smaller minded people into thinking
they're on the other side. It's very, very
small. It's like it's like reverse psychology. It's
like bay basic stuff. They think it does
work on some people. But Matt Kennard points
something out I thought was really important, and
I simply put hashtag rules based international order.
Now overlaps with the same point about regime
change. These are the people trying to present
themselves as the rules based order.
He points this out. UK is sending and
this is posted on, today. UK is sending
700
more troops to its Cyprus colonies.
Did you end he one of the things
he this is from declassified UK. One of
the things he's been pointing out a lot
is the the UK is involved, has been
from the beginning in regard to the genocide
and what Israel is doing going back a
long way, as well as things like this.
That they're the illusion that there's some kind
of a peaceful just like the US government.
They're not what they appear to be. He
says UK is sending those troops. Did you
know that Britain kept
3% of Cyprus upon, quote, independence in 1960?
I didn't know that. He says the territory
is run by a military dictatorship. Oh, yeah?
How what's how how's all the democracy working,
UK? Like, it's funny how you guys love
to scream these things, but then you literally
have a military dictatorship. Friends is saying, why
don't we talk about that? I'm sure you've
got your reasons why that makes sense, but
it's called hypocrisy at the end of the
day. He says, with all the power residing
in the MOD appointed administrator.
So a dictator.
And and a literal dictator, a ruler of
this location.
And he says, I recently went. So what
we're talking about here is is the
a section of this location they claim was
in who whatever the legitimacy of the independence
we can look into. But that they just
held on to this location, and people live
in this location where they they just maintain
a dictatorship
with one entity that rules over their lives.
These are supposed to be the people that
are fighting for the opposite of that, everyone
in the world, but they maintain why?
Because there's obvious need for them in this
loca I think what we need to see
in a larger sense around the world, like
the illegal occupations, like them murdering children and
screaming democracy that these people are not.
In fact, they are the diametric opposite of
what they want you to think that they
are.
Now on that note, I wanna play this
clip from Macklemore regardless of all the partisan,
you know, left, right dynamic. Everyone loves to
jam things into it. Who whoever said this,
it doesn't matter who says this. The statement
is important. And I I and I believe
that this is where we actually are. It's
not about one country or left and right
or communism and fascism. It is about
the opening, the moment
for an actual shift. And I'm not talking
about bricks or the other all you know,
the it's my point. It's the binary thinking.
If you have you have to stand back
and look outside of the one side versus
the other and just recognize maybe there's a
third or maybe there's 14 other options. Maybe
there's a new path, and we need to
fight for that.
Look.
I just wanna say one thing real quick.
I just wanna say one thing.
This
someone asked me,
you know, a couple a couple hours ago
back here, like, you know, how did, you
know,
how did you how did you get involved
in in the movement?
And
I didn't know before.
I didn't know.
And we're on tour.
October 7th happens and I start paying attention.
I start I start
learning.
I start listening. I start
I start going back
and learning the history. It's all takes. This
issue that was deemed so complicated.
Oh, that's complicated. You don't wanna go there.
No. It's actually not that complicated.
It's actually not.
Genocide.
It's a genocide. Absolutely. And it has been
since 1948. Don't get it twisted.
And so and so
I I made a choice
to to speak about what I was what
I was seeing and to post about what
I was seeing. And once you see once
you see enough,
you can't turn back. And once your heart
is open, you can't go back and close
it.
And so
I thank people
like Motaz. There's not words there's not words
to say thank you It it it actually
can capture the depth of that sincerity, of
that deep, deep gratitude because people like Motez,
the people of Palestine
have opened up my heart and my spirit
in a way that would have never been
opened up had it not been for their
struggle, for their
for their fight for liberation, for their fight
for life. It has opened up my experience
here as a human being. And I just
want them to know out there in Palestine
that we are not going anywhere.
This is not something like, oh, shit. It's
it's been a year. Like, now we're fading
out. Fuck that. Our liberation right here
is dependent on Palestinian
liberation. It's dependent on liberation in the Congo
and Sudan. It's collective liberation all around the
world that we are seeking. We must advocate
for the most marginalized.
We will not rest until we are all
free from the river to the sea.
And you see, this is an important point.
As Kathryn Austin fits in a recent interview
said that they they're, you know, doesn't matter
who you vote for, they're all gonna gen
they're all for genocide, they're gonna genocide us.
Now that seems that was slightly misrepresented
by some as meaning only the shot. No.
No. No. If you watch the full interview,
she's talking about Gaza. She's discussing Israel. We
had very very a whole conversation about both.
And her point was that if you look
at
them, not only are they all supporting genocide,
but they will and they support the action
of the injection, both of them used in
your body,
they support genocide
against you and anybody else. So the point
that he's making here is important.
And the way that they love to try
to misrepresent, you know, it the, what is
it? Globalize the intifada. Right? The you could
it's so embarrassing, and it shows you how
desperate these people are. All these US politicians
who are supporting genocide, who love to pretend
they represent you, who are blindly supporting a
foreign government, who is attacking you in every
possible way as well,
blood to lie to you about these things.
Of course, you can use the word revolution
to mean bloody terrorism. You you could name
you could use these words however you want.
Intifada simply means resistance.
And so the point is when you say
globalize it, it means we need to stand
up and recognize not just Gaza, not just
Syria, not just Burkina Faso, not just many
locations around the world that are currently occupied
by these powers.
It's all of us. It's people who are
marginalized, who are repressed, who are occupied, who
are
put in a position that is not
just lacking self determination.
It is now, it is time to stand
up and take advantage of this moment.
And that's what he that's why he's saying
it like that because they that's what that
means.
To pretend that it means let's go kill
the Jews everywhere. Like, it's just so childishly
stupid.
It's cartoonish. And the truth is anybody now
is beginning to realize the the biggest threat
to Jews in the world is Zionism
for many different reasons, including explicitly killing them.
But here, what he's gonna say again, to
play again, is that we need to take
this moment.
I just want them to know out there
in Palestine
that we are not going anywhere.
This is not something like, oh, shit. It's
it's been a year. Like, now we're fading
out. Fuck that. Our liberation right here
is dependent on Palestinian
Liberation.
Now you could take that as many different
things. My opinion is that it's because the
reality of what is at what that's the
pinnacle what this all really does amount to.
The shifting of power, the control, and whether
we're talking about the technocratic side of it.
What we're watching play out is very important.
And I agree that the the outcome of
what this is and who is held accountable
will determine the next steps in our world.
And at the end of the day, that's
what people keep talking about. That if you
allow this, if you don't speak up, this
is what is gonna be normalized going forward
for you.
And if you can't see that by now,
I mean, I it it it's it's I
am scared for the future.
It's dependent on liberation in the Congo and
Sudan. It's collective liberation all around the world
that we are seeking. We must advocate for
the most marginalized.
We will not rest until we are all
free from the river to the sea.
And in case that was confusing, I'm not
scared for the future. I mean, I I
I am worried about where some of these
things are going. But as I keep pointing
out, I'm I'm more
hopeful
about things like this. The fact that there
are so many people,
the obvious majority,
without question, that are pushing back against this.
How was that not inspiring?
Yeah. It's feeling it's really uncomfortable right now
because of that.
That's why it's gotten crazy. That's why it's
so cartoonish.
That's That's why there's no evidence to their
claims. I mean, really, rarely ever is. But
right now, like the Iran allegations we'll get
into next. I mean, they used to at
least try, give it some level of effort.
Now it's just, well, Iran, because that makes
sense for the narrative. They're not even trying
to prove anything.
So there it there there I the right
now, where we're going, at the very least,
has an obvious opportunity for real change, and
I I'm what if that if not hopeful?
So the big win for Palestine,
which we briefly pointed out the other day,
which, you know, it's it's a mixed bag
because it is, as even Sam Husseini points
out, it's a pretty weak effort. It could've
been a lot more specific and a lot
more but it is still a win. The
United Nations General Assembly adopts a Palestinian resolution
calling, first of all, the fact that Palestine
is represented. Right? Like, legitimately,
which bothered Israel, of course, because that only
continues to prove their illegitimacy.
Calling on Israel to end its occupation by
an overwhelming majority. Only 43 abstained, 14 hey.
Look at that. Abstention.
Exactly. What we should be counting in our
election, there should be an option for that
in our elections. They've stolen that from you.
That because the point is there are a
lot of people who are actually very politically
active, like myself, who want to vote but
want to make sure you recognize that I'm
not gonna choose your lesser leavers die lesser
of evils dynamic.
Deploy the manipulation.
I'm gonna abstain in protest and make sure
you count that. And then recognize that that's
the vast majority of this country. Anyway,
14 against, a 124. 4.
Now what I wanna point out is that,
yes, this is an important win.
And as well as Sam Hussain, he's also
pointing out that
it is binding.
As Craig Mokayber and plenty of other people,
not just politicians trying to lie to you,
but people who are in this field, experts
in the topic of international law, are telling
you.
This is not that he goes, this, quote,
nonbinding claim is a distraction.
The general assembly resolution codifies the world court's
findings.
The court which is again, we're talking about
the ICJ,
the idea that this was the ruling and
then the, the the the UN is supposed
to be where this gets codified. That's his
point. The court's opinion addresses matters binding
in international law, including
erga omnes which I've latin for, something in
this context. I didn't look it up. Let's
see what it says right here.
It means
if it'll load for me.
That's weird.
That's strange, I've never seen that.
There it is.
Oh, what?
What's going on here?
That is weird. If you can I don't
even worth explaining for people to probably see
it on the non podcast? Alright. So it
means
the rights or obligations are owed are owed
toward all.
So but the point is that the obligations
are legally binding on all states. States cannot
be compelled to act by the UNGA, but
they will be in the breach of their
preexisting legal obligations if they act contrary to
what the court has found.
That's legally binding.
So the bottom line is, what anybody not
adhering to this is violating international law. So
that's the point that I wanna make. Obviously,
it's a win for it to happen knowing
that the US and Israel are gonna say
no because I mean, guys, they have whatever
you wanna call it. 10 times over double
down on this complicity of genocide or just
on this genocide.
They know. There's no pulling back from this.
They know that. The US government, more than
anybody, Blinkin' more than anybody as this as
the bumbling fool that gets thrown out in
front of you to be the focal point
of your hate at this point. But Blinken
just gets rolled out to say the stupidest
things contrary to what everyone is saying. I'm
I'm convinced at this point he will be
the one thrown out of the bus when
is needed because he's the face that everybody
hates because he's always the one out there
saying all the dumb stuff that everyone knows
is false. But it's just he's just the
puppet of the whole thing at this point,
but they're all part of it. But the
overall overarching point is that this is
something that should matter. Whether whatever your thoughts
about the United Nations, not the, you know,
the body, but these are independent states that
are voting, whether you think whatever you think
of them.
So So the question becomes,
now that they have just said we don't
care, in in countless examples, realistically, going back
decades,
usually around Israel, but any other context they
just don't care about, you've seen it over
and over. The US and Israel just go,
you're bad or you're you're not you're an
illegitimate thing or you're you're a Hamas or
you're a racist against me and just don't
care and disregard the rulings in the security
council, in the general assembly, constantly.
So my question is, doesn't that make this
an invalid
yes. It does. Because what does it matter
if they just get to only point at
the ones that they agree with while just
bucking anything else? That means that going forward,
it's just doesn't have any standing. And so
more than ever, it's been happening a long
time, but now with this point that everyone's
staring at,
what is this change going forward?
Because I'm gonna show you already where where
Israeli entities are going, look at this resolution
they're not following.
I mean, really, think about how embarrassing that
is for people like this.
Here's Elon Levy. This is probably one of
the most ignorant people in this conversation. The
fact that the UN Security Council 7 o
1701 has not been implemented in 18 years
is monstrous.
Like, think about how and then we're gonna
get to the point of Lebanon,
where they're going, imagine being displaced from your
home for almost a year.
They actually said that.
But, I mean, you know they know that
that all of Palestine has been displaced. They
just lean into the lie because what else
are they gonna do? But think about how
embarrassing it is to stand up when the
world knows that you've done that more than
once,
what, 25 times just since October 7th, and
you're screaming about how your illegal settlers had
to be removed from their illegal settlements for
a year and that's so atrocious.
So here he is going, the UN Security
Council. Wait a minute, Levy. I thought you
said the UN was Hamas. So now you're
upset that they didn't follow Hamas' resolution?
Like, we need to ridicule these people. They
are on the surface of the conversation proving
moment to moment to be ridiculous, to be
hypocritical, to be illegal, to be in I
mean, you could go on forever.
To be people that do not care about
the law but force it on you.
So here's what the state of Palestine said
or excuse me, the, the South, president c,
c Cyril
Ramfoza,
I believe of, South Africa, saying in regard
to Palestine and the recent United Nations conversation.
The violence
that Palestinian
people are being subjected to
is a grim continuation
of more than half a century of apartheid
that has been perpetrated against Palestinians
by Israel.
We, South Africans,
know what apartheid looks like.
We lived through apartheid.
We suffered and died under apartheid.
We will not remain silent
and watch
as apartheid is perpetrated
against others.
And don't forget, e Elon Musk is from
South Africa. So you'd think that he might,
you know, be a little bit understand no.
That clearly not. But the point
you know, maybe they're obviously different sides. But
the point here is that this is obvious
that people are standing up and calling this
out, and mo and the vast majority agree
with it. In case you forgot, I'll include
the 3 leading human rights groups that that
human rights watch Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International,
and Bethsallam, which is the leading Israeli human
rights group, telling you 2021 that this Israel
is an apartheid.
Here's amnesty. Israel's apartheid against Palestinians.
The leading Israeli human rights group.
A regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan
River to the Mediterranean Sea, this is apartheid.
Not just because they say it doesn't make
it the case, but it is the case.
Legally speaking,
in every other way possible. Everyone in the
world acknowledges other than the people who have
an interest in not letting you see it.
Now Francesca Albanese highlighting a documentary that you
really should watch, but you've seen
I mean, in other ways, damn near everything
that's in, horrifying realities of illegal settlers, raping,
pillaging, burning people alive, burning houses down, stealing,
terrorizing
long before October 7th.
TRT World put this out, this documentary called
Holy Redemptions, stealing Palestinian Land, exposes how the
sick mentality of illegal Zionist settlers is used
against Palestinians
in the West Bank.
Franchesk Albenis, UN Repertour, says, must watch. TRT
World produced a formidable account on why Israel's
presence in the occupied Palestinian territories
cannot be called other than settler colonial
is is criminal. And as ordered by the
ICJ, and now the United Nations generally assemble
general assembly
must be dismantled immediately,
which they won't do. In fact, they're expanding
in Lebanon now, which they already occupied Lebanon.
That's only going to increase.
Countries aiding or assisting this project may be
found complicit with heinous crimes. And by the
way, that's far too late. They're already complicit.
But our point is the simple reality that
this is
obvious. The evidence is on the record. They're
screaming about what they're doing. They're posting their
own videos of their own complicity and genocide
and acts of genocide all across social media.
Their own people in power are telling you
the things they're say that other governments are
saying aren't true.
It really is wild how obvious it is.
And then the the overarching point is still
the same.
What does it mean for the United Nations
going forward? What does it mean
when now's when what you can see on
the record is that they're just just disregarding
the most recent dice this example in the
one of the largest events that we're seeing
right now. And at the same moment, this
is today,
people like this are saying, what about that
security?
Really? Like, clearly, he's trying to make the
point
by saying, you know, but but by acting
like, well, that one didn't, but he doesn't
say that. The fact that it hasn't been.
But see, the point is this is not
new. You can go back decades and show
how many times Israel explicitly has just said
we don't care about that resolution. Usually, just
calling the UN racist.
So again, ask yourself why Elon Levy would
say that this one needs to be upheld.
Seeing as how you didn't care about the
others or that the UN is apparently Hamas.
We need to make fun of these people.
Glenn Greenwald, despite this, the reality of what
we're actually seeing in the recent United Nations
ruling, which again is supposed to be international
law.
Right? The old rules based order, or that
the US government, Blinken explicitly said the difference
between us is that we follow international law,
and here they are just ignoring it.
Again, that's I mean, in in in a
non genocide context, that you can almost make
that funny. How ridiculous and bumbling these people
are. How they just lie to your face.
But it's not funny because they're literally chill
killing children as I speak.
But despite that, despite the world view of
everyone seeing that they've said this is a
problem. You're supposed to do this. That's a
crime. They're occupying it. It's an apartheid state.
Guess what the US does?
Sends more troops to the Middle East to
help Israel fight Lebanon,
according to the Pentagon.
Who, Glenn Greenwald says, specifically made this decision
to deploy massive US military assets to the
region for Israel's new war?
It's a good question.
The point is, it wouldn't matter if it
was Trump or Biden or Kamala or any
they're all
doing the same thing.
So here we go. You know, everyone's screaming
about World War 3. The very people that
are acting like it's a it's funny how
the people that are gonna make that case
are pointing anywhere other than what Israel's doing,
and this is the living example of what
that I shouldn't say that. There is actually
a lot of Republicans
who are pointing this out.
Rather conservative, I would argue. Non team support
but they're pointing out that this is what's
leading us there. But what you will not
hear is from the mainstream alternative media, screeching
about globalism while ignoring the obvious globalist agenda
of Israel or pointing anything other than what
they're actually doing. And every string ties back
to them and what this conversation is, but
they don't want you to see it.
It's really sad. But make sure you note
that when you look to,
you know, engage with media.
Greg Stoecker also points out, remember how I
said, this is what he's saying, I wouldn't
be concerned until I saw deployment orders from
active duty combat units to West Asia? Well,
the 101st airborne division touched down in Cyprus.
Cyprus, talking about the UK overlap. Possibly in
Degev, he says, Cyprus media reporting mass mobilizations
on British bases. So that's that's, Cernod's whole
point. They've been active in this ongoing genocide
from the long before it even started in
regard to Israel's illegal occupation.
But here's the actual documentation they're deploying. So,
I mean, let's realize this is not some
kind of a small thing. It's already there.
The US government, the UK, they're embedded,
occupied. They're they are in law in league
with this complicit or with this genocide.
But this is just a public example, which
is pretty concerning.
And despite them screaming how they wanna deescalate,
every single thing they do is the opposite,
And that is the game.
People who want politically to pretend that's the
game, if it was Trump, for example, they'd
go, he said deescalate.
You're all lying even though weapons and bombs
and everything because that's what matter. Action is
what matters.
What either one of them say right now
is, as we all know, meaningless
for a 1000 reasons because it almost never
comes to pass
for whatever you wanna justify with. That's what
we should actually engage with. The reality, not
the team's warped politics. But as censorban points
out, all of this.
If we can't acknowledge by now that US
foreign policy is essentially an extension of Israel's
agenda, you're lying to yourself. That's not about
a racist point or a religious point. It's
about the obvious objective reality of what this
can be done by US foreign policy and
whose interest it has served.
Nothing has been in the interest of the
US government.
Or, well, I should say specifically the US
population.
You could argue that it's been in the
interest of the US government because their interests
are for Israel. But either way, it is
not in the interest of this country.
Not even remotely.
Even the idea of stopping terrorism. Well, everything
they've done has been growing that. In I
mean, literally arming funding and working with the
people that they say they're trying to fight.
We should know this by now. Whether it's
Israel funding Hamas right up until October 7th,
which is a shockingly obvious point to prove,
or the fact that they have been arming,
working with the worst elements of what they
claim they're fighting in the Middle East since
this has been going on. Don't forget that
the reality that Zionism
is the impetus for terrorism in this location.
The Zionists have used it and brought it,
in fact, to the area. Terrorism as we
know it today, the planting of bombs and
marketplaces and so on and so forth, was
in fact introduced into the Middle East by
the Zionists in the twenties.
But the net result of of Zionist,
terrorism and and violence in the in the
1st 3rd of 20th century has brought forth,
to my mind, the the anomaly, the
horrific and unacceptable status in the Middle East
today of the state of Israel, which is
in fact an armed garrison state, which now
exports more arms and distributes violence all around
the world.
And don't forget that, by the way. This
point can't be missed even while this is
happening.
Your government and many governments are dumping, dumping
arms and money into the hands of Israel,
who then literally, in some cases, sells it
to other people.
It's just so gross how obvious this is.
And it's it's and you why why is
that okay with anybody? Whether you're in the
UK, the United States, or anywhere.
If this is supposed to be because they're
in such desperate need, why is that happening?
There was an article written in Israeli media
about that.
Kills me. Vastly disproportionate to its size. I
mean, in that respect,
violence. But in it all, I think the
Palestinian is the victim. There's no question about
that. Yeah. There is no question about that.
Now here is a censored man pointing out,
how can anyone watch this and think that
Israel hasn't been running American foreign policy?
Other nations that you would recommend that the
United States launch preemptive attacks upon at this
point? The answer is categorically yes. The 2
nations that are vying, competing with each other,
who will be the first to achieve nuclear
weapons is Iraq and Iran. A 3rd nation,
by the way, is Libya as well. While
no one is watching, under the cloak is
trying very rapidly to build an atomic bomb
capability.
The question that you ask, I think, is
vital. It's important. And that is what do
you do about it? You have to dismantle
the network. And the question is do you
dismantle all of it at once?
No. The first thing you did after the
wake up call on September 11th was that
you took on the first regime, the obvious
regime. You removed the Taliban regime and you
scattered Al Qaeda over. It has not been
completely destroyed. Now the question is, what's your
next step? Knowing that 3 of these nations
are developing nuclear weapons,
this is not a hypothesis.
It is fact.
Iraq, Iran, and Libya are racing to develop
nuclear weapons. So now what is the next
step?
I believe that the next step is to
choose. It's not a question of whether you
have to take action, but what kind of
action and against whom. If I had to
choose, should there be military action first against
Iraq or first against Iran, I would choose
to go after Iraq.
How do we ignore something like that? And
the reality of foreign policy which followed suit
explicitly.
Let's not forget that Netanyahu himself
spoke about this, and this is Haratz. This
is from 2008.
Netanyahu says 911 terror attacks, good for Israel.
Oops.
Because they they're just belligerent.
They take advantage.
Here and I'll include James Corbett's work specifically
on the 911 suspects part of this is
a larger
multi part called 911 suspects series. This is
about the dancing Israelis and the reality which,
by the way, if you haven't seen this,
you watch this and there's no question about
what this shows you. It's on these these
people went back to Israel and did an
interview about how they were sent there to
document the 911 event. They were Mossad agents
and it's all on the reg it's so
easy to prove. But we just pretend it's
not there because you're racist,
which used to work.
Now let's not forget this clip, which will
bring us over into Donald Trump and the
rest of our government seemingly screeching about how
Iran is the next thing. But why do
you think that is? That has been Israel's
focal point, Israel's end point in this for
a long time. Maybe you've forgotten this clip.
Now regardless of what you think about Clark,
and we should be skeptical of why this
ever came out, doesn't doesn't matter. The truth
is that this is a real dynamic that
has taken place going back to Zbrenz even
before, but Zbib Khubrzinski and the Balkanization and
the long term plan of what they need
to accomplish
for Israel, but for their own agendas as
well, but I think largely be put forward
and driven by Israel. Like, post JFK assassination,
which was conducted with the CIA and Mossad,
things have shifted very dramatically in this direction.
And there's a reason that shift took place
and why that was taken out. Because, remember,
he was focusing on exposing the APAC connection,
influencing our government, and exposing the Dimona nuclear
plant, which showed that they had nuclear weapons,
that they stole parts the technology from the
United States. And then he was killed.
And here is what happened because of that,
or rather the one of the many things
that happened after this because of that influence
going forward.
For 911.
About 10 days after 911, I went through
the Pentagon and I saw secretary Rumsfeld and
and deputy secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just
to say hello to some of the people
on the joint staff who used used to
work for me. And one of the generals
called me and he said, sir, you gotta
come in you gotta come in and talk
to me a second. I said, well, you're
too busy. He said, no. No. He says,
you we've made the decision. We're going to
war with Iraq.
This was on or about the 20th September.
I said, we're going to war with Iraq?
Why?
He said, I don't know.
I always hate that people laugh right there.
Like, I get it, you know, it's it's
kind of the way he he's smiling.
But it's like you think about why would
that be a funny moment? Like, the point
is, like, we're going to war with people,
murdering, you know, killing people, but we don't
even know why.
That's not funny, that's terrifying. But, you know,
the point is it's kinda we're supposed to
look at it like that, like, you're outside
of it all. Right? We're fighting for freedom,
whatever, just kill those children, go back to
slits, can you go back to Walmart, McDonald's
and just enjoy our day? That's It's just
crazy to me how much American population has
been put to sleep
so these things could carry us, so we
laugh at things like that.
Remember,
500,000 children, we thought it was worth it.
That's that's one of the many outcomes of
this discussion.
He said, I guess they don't know what
else to do.
Yeah. For about 20th September.
I said, we're going to war with Iraq.
Why?
He said, I don't know.
He said, I guess they don't know what
else to do.
And of course, the all the other point
is that, remember, the narrative was come was
cobbled together that these were weapons of mass
destruction. Well, the point was they knew from
the very beginning that wasn't true. And that's
come out a long time ago, but nobody
went to jail for it. Ask yourself why.
So, I said, well, did they find some
information collect connecting Saddam to Al Qaeda? He
said, nope. No. No. He says there's nothing
new that way. They just And Al Qaeda
is a is a asset of the US
government in Israel. There's no question. Not every
single piece probably, but the overarching discussion just
like with Hamas or the way they used
the Mujahideen against Russia and Afghanistan. It's the
same exact dynamic, guys. This is what they
do.
Made the decision to go to war with
Iraq. He said, I guess it's like we
don't know what to do about terrorists, but
we got a good military and we can
take down governments. And, he said, I guess
if the only thing we have is a
hammer, every problem has to look like a
nail. We could take down governments. That sound
like democracy to anybody? I mean, look, everybody
everywhere with a brain knows that was never
the case. Ask yourself why we have to
put up pretenses for this.
So I came back to see him a
few weeks later,
and by that time, we were bombing in
Afghanistan. I said, are we still going to
war with Iraq? And he said, oh, it's
worse than that. He said he reached over
on his desk. He picked up a piece
of paper. He said, I just he said,
I just got this down from upstairs, meaning
the secretary of defense's office today. And he
said, this is a memo that describes how
we're gonna take out
7 countries
in 5 years,
starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon,
Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off Iran. Every
single one of which the US government is
bombing
Or or has been or some other way
manipulating and ultimately as at war with them.
This is the point.
That is an Israeli agenda for Israeli interests.
And currently with Lebanon, Iran being the end
game, all of these builds in the same
direction.
It's incredible to me. Trump and Trump included.
And the fact that this is so easily
stated, we're going to go to war. We're
gonna take out 7 countries in 5 years.
And this is a very public conversation. It's
not disputed. This is easily this is the
reality. Obviously, since we sought carry out. Not
necessarily 5 years, but the point is the
same. And yet we still walk around pretending
like there's something else going on. Let's get
past this. As Americans, as the world, let's
stop putting up pretenses for oligarchs and powerful
people that tell you how to think.
I said, is it classified? He said, yes,
sir.
I said
And then it goes on to make the
same point. And again, the bottom line is
that that was the case and and ending
with Iran.
So I'll include this since I mentioned it.
My interview is with Corey Hughes. It's a
great interview. Was Israel behind the assassy assassination
of JFK? At least in his research and
his opinion? Very much so, and I agree.
Then this clip which you've probably seen before.
Just showing you how this public conversation about
how we how are we gonna get to
war with Iran before we actually show how
they're beginning these agenda. Well, again, this has
been going on a long time, but it's
clear that this is beginning to come out.
This is beginning they they're they're marshaling their
efforts against Iran again. Now it may fail
again. It may falter because they're clearly losing
influence, but the point is that they've done
this many times. Going back to before op
the illegal
coup,
operation Ajax.
Right? Or and then after the revolution
where they took back control of their country,
whatever you think of them, against an illegal
occupation,
and then forever since, they're all evil terror
bad guys.
But the truth is, whatever you think, even
if that is the case, what they're doing
is still illegal. What they're doing is still
the worst example of what we need to
stop in this world.
Because remember, where the actual guy the terrorism
element comes from is their partner.
I frankly think that crisis initiation is really
tough.
And it's very hard for me to see
how the United States,
president can get us to war with Iran.
Now for this is the Washington Institute For
Near East Policy,
and this is Patrick Clausen.
Right out of the gate. It's really hard
to see how the president gets us to
war
with Iran.
This is who this is the reality of
our current rulership
and going back a long way.
Which leads me to conclude that if, in
fact, compromise is not comping,
that the traditional way of America gets to
war is what would be best for US
interests.
Right. Not democracy, not freedom, but what's best
for their interests. Not your interest, but the
government's interests.
And we've seen that. Again, if you you
could dispute that as a statement and what
you think is going on. But if you
look back at the last just 20 years
of policy,
obviously,
do you really think those choices were in
the interest of anybody other than Israel? Anybody
other than the immediacy of current government p
entities trying to benefit from that dynamic? It's
hurt this country. It's hurt you. It's hurt
the everything.
So that's the reality. That's that's the objective
reality of what that what the even if
you think they tried to do good things,
clearly they were failing. And that's the point
that I always make because it's so clear
that's not the case. But even if you
think that, shouldn't we go, woah. Don't do
it again.
Stop, please. Stop working on Lebanon. Stop the
because they are that bad at it. But
clearly, it doesn't matter because
the driving factor behind this has nothing to
do with logic. Some people might think that
mister Roosevelt wanted to get us into the
best US interest.
Some people might think that mister Roosevelt wanted
to get us into World War 2 as
David mentioned. You may recall we had to
wait for Pearl Harbor.
Some people might think mister Wilson wanted to
get us into World War 1. You may
recall he had to wait for the Lusitania
episode.
Some people might think that mister Johnson want
to send troops to Vietnam, you may recall
he had to wait for the Gulf of
Tonkin episode.
We didn't go to war with Spain until
the USS,
until the Maine exploded.
And Every war starts with a false flag
as a common statement. There's a lot of
truth to it. And the truth is, as
he said, crisis initiation is tough. So if
you hear him say that to start and
then listen to these, well, that's their it's
this is the way language works. He's discussing
crisis initiation.
Crisis initiation, which means all of those were
initiating
crisis, which would then lead to the justification
to war.
They did this. And every example he's listing
is pretty easy to prove.
May I point out that mister Lincoln did
not feel he could call out the federal
army until Fort Sumter was attacked. All the
evacuation. That's why he ordered the commander at
Fort Sumter to do exactly that thing, which
the South Carolinians had said would cause
an attack. Okay. So that's very clear. Ends
it by saying Lincoln literally chose to do
the thing that he knew would draw it
so then he could use that to justify
the thing that killed people, a thing that
you then point at and say, thou dare
the that you use that as the as
the cry for why you're the one being
attacked and we had to fight back.
That is the history of these people.
So if in fact, the Iranians aren't gonna
compromise,
it would be best if somebody else started
the war.
That's crazy.
But I would just like to sit And
the and the laughing, you know, like, just
this smug
superior idea that they get They're just chuckling
about entire continents going to war, countries going
to war, and how hundreds of thousands of
deaths
all for an all for your agenda.
Just that,
one can combine other means of pressure with
sanctions.
I mentioned that explosion,
on August 17th. And don't forget that. So
when he's pointing at sanctions, realize what he's
saying. He's not They're not sanctioning them because
we're trying to help the people of Iran
because they're starving them because they throw people
off the roof, all these narrative
claims they've thrown out. No. He's talking about
getting them to war. So sanctions are a
means to get them to war with Iran.
Like, just this is what's so frustrating for
people like us that are watching these things
that can see that just people that are
lost in the Fox News, CNN dynamic,
they just it's it's it's impossible sometimes.
It's so vividly clear that they are not
what they present themselves as, and our entire
job is just trying to get you to
look at it. Listen to them. They're telling
you, look at what Israel just did. Look
at what they're saying.
Everywhere.
They're trying to initiate war and then calling
themselves the victims, and you apply that to
anybody we're talking about right now.
We could step up the pressure.
I mean, look, people. Iranian submarines periodically go
down. Someday one of them might not come
up. Who would know why? Wow.
We can do a variety of things if
we wish to increase the pressure. I'm not
advocating that. Oh, yeah. Yeah. But I'm just
suggesting that, it it it it's this this
is not a a either or proposition of,
you know, it's just
Right. So we could destroy their submarines and
kill people or we could do sanction or
both. Good times.
Sanctions has to has to succeed or other
things.
We are in the game
of using covert means against the Iranians.
We we could get massed here with that.
And don't forget that killing people who are
not in an active military situation are a
crime no matter who they're part of or
what they're working with. These people don't care
about any of the laws, any of the
rights, any of the things they profess to
care about. And it that's not my opinion.
Look at their actions.
Now as Daniel McAdams points out in regard
to what Trump just said, this is today,
mind you. Trump says, big threats on my
life by Iran.
He's referring to these whatever you wanna call
them.
The whole Iraq debacle, the guy in the
field who's apparently had a gun who wrote
a letter that about how he failed months
before he ever did it, because that makes
perfect sense. Right?
Or I guess the other one that everyone's
claiming is some kind of third attempt, which
is just so it's getting it's, I mean,
it's actually crazy how cartoonish this is getting.
Maybe that's the point. I don't know. Consider
that too. Maybe we're supposed to call this.
I don't know. But what's wild is how,
out of everything, despite how crazy these stories
are. And I'm not saying one thing or
the other. I honestly don't know. I I'm
just what I can point out is, for
example, like, this is what I said in
a recent interview. The ear thing is really
interesting to me. Because from any object like,
if you took this outside of the Trump
partisan conversation and just took, like, a doctor
aside from everything and said, if I shot
with this gun and nicked the top of
that ear, would no. Is there anything I
could do that would make it be nothing
in 4 in 12 days? I mean, come
on, guys. I just did I mean, the
easiest explanation is that the
I I don't even wanna get into speculation.
The point is because that's where people jump
to conclusions. The point is not to say
this means that or I think that. I
don't my honest opinion about that first one
was just, like, it blows my mind
that it just got left where we'd have
no idea. Not even the corporate media ultimately.
They just went with the ultimate first general
narrative that basically republicans are are. It's funny
how the republicans are going with the official
narrative.
But that doesn't make any sense because there's
been so many contradictions. I mean, I can
go through it all again. It's blow blows
my mind. And then the Ryan Ruth thing
is wild. Because ultimately, remember,
he apparently sent a box months before to
somebody with a letter that said I failed.
And and then with a thing that said,
$150,000
to whoever completes the job?
So he planned to fail? I mean, they
are they are the they are either this
bad
and clumsy at patching this together,
or that's meant to be seen. But what's
crazy to me is most of the Republicans
talking about it weirdly omit that point. You
know why? Because it's far more useful to
make it seem like they were pray praising
a a a bounty on the president. That's
what they're doing. Look at the the government
put out a bounty and they're not even
ashamed to put it. Well, it doesn't make
any sense if you wrote it a month
before and put it in a box instead
of the the point is, guys, this is
clumsy.
Nobody cares. Like, the point they make about
Putin claiming to endorse Kamala Harris, which whether
he does or not is certainly possible. The
clip they point out is a joke, and
a 4 year old could tell that where
they were laughing about it. And the point
was Biden said he calls on his allies
and he goes, well, I guess I got
a criminal call then or Kamala then. And
they all laugh about it. And all of
them, to this very day, are going, he
supported Kamala. There you go. Because it works.
And they all know it wasn't true. They
just used it because it works. That's the
partisan game for you. They even had to
write an article from ABC that was like,
turns out he didn't really endorse her. It's
like, my god. Do we live in this
kind of a I just I don't believe
most people are that stupid.
But he goes on. Big threats on my
life by Iran with zero evidence whatsoever.
The entire US military is watching but waiting.
Come on. I mean, again, this is classic
Trump. Every military in the world, in the
universe, every planet I've ever known of is
currently watching my back.
As opposed to just some of them are
kind of looking for things that might happen.
The entire military come it's just it's funny
how obvious he is with his exaggerations.
We all know that, but it just it
just kills me. But he goes, moves were
already made by Iran that didn't work out.
Okay. For example,
Vance did the same thing. There's no evidence
of this. They're just bluntly saying the they
want you to think that the assassination attempts,
even though Vance even was like, well, we
don't know for sure,
is all Iran with no evidence because that's
an Israeli agenda.
But it says moves were already made, but
they will try again.
Not a good situation for anyone. Now, of
course, it's certainly possible.
But it doesn't make any There's no evidence
whatsoever that Iran had anything to do with
any of this,
other than somehow Like, I would argue with
the worst that or the best narrative. They
would try to cobble this back to some
Hamas action that they claim is Iran or
Hezbollah, but at the end of the day,
there is nothing like that. They don't even
tried.
It all comes back to some internal source
from the government that says,
because I'm surrounded by more men, guns, and
weapons than I've ever seen before. Thank you
to congress for unanimously approving more money to
the Secret Service. The same Secret Service, by
the way, that most of his supporters are
saying are trying to kill him because, you
know, totally lines up. But it says nice
to see republicans and democrats get together on
something. Right? That's just a a very lazy
kind of nod to this lie about the
unity party.
They're they're they're resistance and the unity party.
It's just it's just the same old two
party dynamic. It's just lazy. They really are
trying hard this time and it's failing. But
it says an attack on a former president
is a death wish for the attacker.
And this is where it comes to the
next part. A death wish for the attacker.
So anything that happens now is an Iran
attack, and that means I have to attack
Iran.
It's pretty easy to see how that works.
But here's quick side point before we go
to the point he just said about bombing
Iranian
homes.
The Anna Mastin points out that Trump is
working on the transition team
3 months early due to private donors. That
if you, you know, have are you paying
attention outside of partisanship? That should be kinda
concerning.
Because private donors means, like, the Adelson feel
overlap. And that's pretty weird to me for
them to be already kind of handpicking the
transition team before you
but let's just call it preparation. Okay? Put
that aside. It says Kennedy spoke in length
about this.
He said, Trump, I'm going to put you
on the transition team. Or he said Trump
said, I'm going to put you on the
transition team.
He says, president Trump told me that the
last time around when he got into the
office that he was not prepared to govern.
So you are to see where this is
going.
Just give me a pass. White wash everything,
including the way I still praise the thing
that killed all those people, the shot. I
just wasn't prepared. You know? And what did
we tell you last time? He came out
and said, I'm gonna surround myself with the
best people. And he picked the literal swamp.
And we said, those are bad people. And
they go, well, you gotta have insiders to
fight the inside. And then 1 by 1,
they all became the same people he told
you they were and they go, well, he
didn't know any better. Well, guess what? That's
what we were saying. But just because you
wanna kinda step along with how whatever Trump
points to at that moment and go, that's
the thing. No. That's the new narrative. No.
That's why. And you were wrong even though
you were right.
You're right. You're you're Scott Adams right there.
Same thing. The bottom line is that's what
we said would happen, and it's happening again.
But he's saying he wasn't prepared to govern.
He said he really didn't know what came
next. Well, isn't that a pretty stupid thing
to say?
You're running your entire campaign? You had all
sorts of I don't even believe that. You're
telling me you have an entire
grouping of people you've hired and they don't
prepare for the next step that you didn't
know what to do next? All this has
done in my mind is to try to
say, just give me a pass for everything
that didn't happen then and it was because
I just didn't I wasn't ready. Oh, he's
so humble. He admitted he wasn't ready. Now
now we're gonna do it right this time.
Come on, Theo and Vance and Elon and
all the rest of the same come on,
guys.
Silly.
It says that he was immediately surrounded with
business corporations, lobbyists who said put this guy
in power, put that guy in position. Yeah.
Yeah. Exactly. So if I was able to
foresee that, you're telling me Trump couldn't think
that together?
Come on. There are 14,000 positions the president
had to fill. Well, yeah, guys, this wasn't
new information.
And he filled them with the worst possible
people alive.
Anyway, you get where this goes. And now
the point is, well, now private donors
are allowing it to happen early.
Yeah. That's pretty terrifying to me. So what
that means is now the Israeli lobby or
rather the Israeli
lobbying effort is gonna handpick who he puts
in his cabinet. By the way, just like
every other time, Whether it's Israel or Citibank
or whatever you wanna talk about, it's never
what you think.
Tired of having to play this game, or
people that want you to sc screen you
down from beginning to notice this.
Now here is where this goes next, which
is happening now. So as he's being as
RFK was speaking on the stage, acting like
Trump just needs to get a pass because
he just wasn't ready.
Well, what's the excuse this time then, RFK?
Here's Daniel McAdams.
Where is Trump getting this idiotic idea that
Iran is sending hit teams against him? Well,
guess what, guys? From the same neocon thug
who wanted to arrest Trump supporters as domestic
terrorists. Exactly the point Whitney makes. He says,
come on, Trump. How can you fall for
this again? Well, you know, my point is
he's not falling for anything. He's just not
on your side.
Julie Kelly points out, the woman in the
yellow square, guess who? Avril Lavigne or excuse
me. Avril Lavigne. Avril Haines.
Averel Haines. The same
swamp creature involved with you the,
that to a one involved with many different
problematic situations that we've been highlighting for a
very long time. And guess what? Here she
is in Trump's ear yet again.
Says to the left of Susan Rice, to
the right is current deputy AG Lisa mak
Monaco. These are these people are informing Trump.
It says
or just specifically, Avril, but this case is
a picture about Obama's time. But it says,
Rice called Haines and Monaco her sisters. It
says Haines is now Biden's DNI. She briefed
Trump yesterday on Iranian threats against him. Now
it doesn't have to mean that she's blindly
taking direction from Avril Haines, but what it
means is that
whoever says it, it's like, good. Let's use
that.
Or it could mean exactly what he's highlighting.
But this says, my sense of things here
in the waiting waning months of 2024 is
that Trump is even more susceptible now to
nonsense intel and bad advice than he was
during the 1st term. Again, this leans in
the idea that he's like a bumbling fool
that doesn't know he's being misled. Maybe. But
that's pretty unnerving in any case, but I
don't I think it's more specific that this
is all part of something.
But Daniel says, sadly, I think you're right.
Zero indication that he has taken any realists,
let alone non interventionists, into his foreign policy
circle. You might have said RFK, except he's
blindly supporting the biggest genocide we can see.
Darke says, he's trusting the same organizations and
agencies that destroyed his first term.
Again, maybe it's because he's a part of
it, guys.
And here's what he just said. This is
from today, or at least posted today. It
says
I'll I'll I'll play it first.
For the president, I would inform the threatening
country,
in this case, Iran, that if you do
anything to harm this person, we are going
to blow your
largest cities and the country itself
to smithereens. We're gonna blow it to smithereens.
You can't Now see how this always works?
Words have meaning. Okay? Especially when you're a
a a ruler.
But as always, they're gonna go, well, I
was just speaking off the cuff, and he
didn't mean it's civilian. Well, how do you
know that? I love how they love to
jump in and defend and act like you
know what was in his mind. That's very
childish. It's like that you might as well
be corporate media. Okay?
The reality is he said blow the
the what was the first word? Hold on.
It was, something in country. The country itself,
just cities and the Your cities. So either
way, so all of a city or all
of the country. Let's just take city. If
you're gonna blow the city to smithereens,
you're gonna kill civilians. But we already know
this is how they operate, guys. They've killed
civilians, broads, I mean, in every single field
of war, including Gaza,
that you I've ever seen.
And that's interestingly enough, Israel loves to throw
that point out. You guys didn't care when
they were killing all these civilians in Iraq.
Well, yeah. We actually did. But thank you
for making my point.
So what he's doing there is saying and
let's just even say he doesn't mean it.
Because I don't know, maybe he's just blustering
because that's what he does. Nonetheless,
he is standing up as the one pretending
to be the rules based order, whatever you
wanna say his narrative is, fighting for democracy
or freedom or fighting for the rules or
whatever.
And screaming that we're going to just annihilate
your cities. Why? Because you you threatened us.
That is Israel speaking.
It's the same thing they do everywhere.
Right? You you poke my guy in the
eye, I'm gonna murder 17 of your family.
Yeah. That's sure as hell a crime. They
don't care. That's what we saw with the
UN, with the journalists. Right now with Lebanon,
one of the biggest examples you're seeing is
that journalists
and aid workers and UN members, and they're
tear they're pulling themselves away because they know
they're gonna get targeted.
So there's a successful operation, and the only
reason it's successful is because the power structures
pretending to fight for human rights turned a
blind eye to 100 of UN members, 100,
100 of people, journalists, doctors,
nurses, ambulance drivers, we'll get to in a
minute.
They damn well know that.
And that's the whole byproduct of it.
Country itself
to blow your largest cities and the country
itself
to smithereens. We're gonna blow it to smithereens.
You can't do that.
Nobody would cheer for something like that. Like,
that's not a cheer worthy moment. That's that's
like cheering on a movie. Even if you
think it's the right move, you don't you
that is something that's a that's a somber
nah. Yep. Yep. If you agree with it,
which I don't. Which is disgusting to say
we would bomb an entire city because you
threaten our people.
But that's what that's what he's turning people
into. He is the lowest common denominator.
Kamal is just too stupid to know what's
going on, but the point is they're both
leading in the same direction.
And there would be no more threats.
There would be Oh, there'd be no more
threats apparently. Despite Israel actively threatening us every
single day of our lives or many other
countries that you've destroyed who are actively recognizing
you as a threat. But no more threats
because we murdered this, but what that causes
is the exact opposite of what they frame.
Every time. This lie about
security through strength or through as Israel's literally
saying in Lebanon,
through escalation, deescalation.
I mean, they're just playing you for a
fool. That's how stupid they think we are.
Prove them wrong, because we're not that stupid.
The problem though is that the people like
this in the screen, or Kamala, or Trump,
or Avcare, or whoever we're talking about, redundant,
I said Trump twice,
is that they don't care. They allow it.
Most of us care.
They're just trying to bring you down to
their level.
All for the interest of a foreign country
at your expense.
Blow them to smithereens.
Well, Daniel McAdams points out that they're coming
they're they're really bringing up the temperature again.
They put out this ridiculous video of some
I I I think this came from,
this person says posted on Ayatollah's website. I
don't know the validity of that. The point
is that there's propaganda flying around everywhere and
all this is showing is Trump golfing and
some targeted attack.
Right? Which, again, that's exactly what we're seeing
in every dynamic. Everywhere. Israel, the United States,
I mean, they're all blustering the same thing.
My point is always is that's why governments
are the problem. But overall, what Daniel McAdams
says is they are and this is being
posted by Mike Lee, who is a,
senator for Utah. He says they're again pushing
the Saddam has WMD's
BS to gin up war on Iran.
And just like before, Washington's know nothing political
class is falling forward hook, line, and sinker.
But again, I simply argue
that they're not falling for anything. Some of
them are just blind followers and don't even
know they're being played. But I think most
of them are playing a role.
A lot of money is flying into their
pockets that has everything to do with interest
outside of this country.
Speaking of that, here's Tom Cotton.
He says, where do Hezbollah's missiles come from?
Well, from Hezbollah, and maybe their allies as
well. But you act like this is some
kind of a an entity that is like,
the way they love to frame these like,
even Iran for that matter.
Except when they wanna frame them as them
being technologically advanced to sell weapons to other
people. They love to frame as back cave,
you know, Muslims in their caves, like, just
disgusting racist sentiments.
When in reality,
they're one of the most technologically advanced locations
on the planet.
Speaking of Iran. But then the point is
Hezbollah
does work with their allies just like the
US government sells weapons to the most dangerous
people in the world. All of them. And
we're not talking about Iran or Saudi Arabia
or rather excuse me. Or Syria. Definitely Saudi
Arabia. But all these locations that they do
sell to are regarded as the most dangerous,
the most potential for human rights violations around
the world. The report comes out every year.
Every year, they keep selling them to us.
Israel, Saudi Arabia, chief among them. But the
point on top of that is that they
sell weapons around the world, but it's only
bad guy stuff when other people do it.
But either way, his point is, who where
do Hezbollah's missiles come from? And he says,
Iran.
The same Iran that Biden Harris gave 100
and 1,000,000,000 of dollars. Okay. That it means
nothing.
One,
it says in sanctions relief, the point is
on the they always love the point of
the money they gave back that was stolen,
that was their money. So whatever you wanna
say about it, the only narrative he's making
here, the point is that Iran bad guy.
Right? So they do something, it bad. We
can't give Iran money because Iran bad.
It's just just so it's weird. It's kindergarten
stuff, guys. Tom Cotton is a fool. If
you listen to him talk, this guy is
a bumbling fool. And he speaks in
phrases that have been paid into his mind.
We're watching them build a narrative that somehow
everything is Iran's fault with zero evidence.
But here's my point. He said, who gave
them missiles Iran? Which that's a clumsy, broad
statement. I guarantee there's more than just Iran
involved. And they have a legal right to
sell weapons to their allies just like the
US government does. But I said, where do
Israel Israeli missiles come from? Oh, the US
government. I said, oh, that's you.
I said, the same US government that has
a legally occupied country, count countless nations, raped,
murdered, pillaged, and destroyed every single one of
them with Israeli help and cultivated the very
terrorist population it now uses.
Simple. Right? The only difference is that one
of them is committing genocide.
But here's Tom Cotton telling you we have
to worry about the unprovable allegation of somebody
selling legal weapons to an ally.
Oh my god.
Ignore the children starving to death while he
type that. Ignore the ongoing bombing of civilians
in Lebanon. Ignore it because he doesn't care
about those things, or you.
Now this whatever this right honorable, Burham Taplow,
at least presenting as a British,
like, pre pre past British empire entity, he
says, TLAB, you support Iran? Its president stands
at the UN making incredible statements while its
regime crushes freedoms, funds Hezbollah Hamas. Oh, that's
Israel, bud. Houthis in Iraq, we've stabilized region.
No. These are all false claims. How does
that not offend anyone seeking peace? UN, Iran,
honestly, nut job.
So the point is he wasn't asking a
question. He clearly already thought he had the
answer.
Smart. But here is what Lee Dovah said,
which saved me having to respond. He said,
you're the perfect example of what TLAB talks
about. Just because he points out America and
Israel problems does not mean he supports the
other side. Oh, you think that a child
could grasp that logic, but not people who
have bad intentions.
He says, doesn't mean the other side isn't
bad either. TLAB has been consistent on his
views when it comes to all of these
governments because I have.
And they're all bad. And I agree with
that. He says some might be worse than
others, but in the end, they're all bad.
This black white thinking where one is good
and the other guy is the other must
be the bad guy, has trapped people, especially
the ones who who claim to be seeking
the truth, into an illusion that keeps them
ignorant in the dark. Well said.
Point is though, this guy didn't care if
he's even a real person. He's just trying
to play the other side game because the
point is obvious.
Sad. It really is.
Now this brings us to the point of
a little bit of the 2 party illusion,
but the point about the dynamic of the
overlap of the outrage of concern for Ukraine
versus Iran, the point of where you direct
your concern. And the mainstream alternative media,
their most important job right now, I think,
is to get you looking anywhere other than
Israel.
Out of sheer desperation.
Julia points out that Tucker Carlson oh, I
think I actually have the clip.
Maybe not.
Yeah. It's not important. So the clip basically
what he says,
I actually don't really wanna show up in
somebody else's state and attack their politicians, but
I saw a photograph of your governor, Josh
Shapiro, standing with a foreign leader,
signing an artillery shell that's going to kill
civilians in a country we're not at war
with, with a grain on his face. I
was disgusted by it. Actually, I was enraged
by it.
Well, you know where this is going, don't
you? You know, actual objectivity, not pretending.
I said, well, now address all the republicans
doing the exact same thing with the US
bombs. It is real currently being used to
murder children in multiple nations, Tucker.
I'm sure we can hold our breath.
I was just it's just so pathetically obvious.
He's literally talking about Josh Shapiro
signing
Ukrainian bombs standing next to the Zelensky.
That outraged well, it'd be that should outrage
you because it's disgusting. But isn't it funny
how he's never talked about, I don't know,
Nikki Haley or Mike Pence signing bombs in
Israel?
I mean, you because you you know why,
guys. Because they he loves to kinda give
you a nod to make you think maybe
he's against this, but that's not what's happening.
It's obvious these people are playing a role.
If you're I mean, look. I'm not ever
gonna be the one to say people have
to cover everything or cover what I do
or care about everything I do. But if
you can't acknowledge this is the most obviously
important discussion that pertains to US politics, that
it pertains to our tax dollars, that is
being done in our name, for crying out
loud. You're not a journalist. You don't have
to cover it all day long, but you
have to be clear about what they're doing
there.
I just think it's so embarrassingly obvious that
there are people out there that have no
concern about what's going on or the truth
as if it even brushes up against Israel.
That is an that is a failure of
objectivity, a choice.
Willful ignorance. Whether they're being paid or just
don't care or think they're a Zionist, it
should concern you. Here's Mike Pence literally signing
these bombs that went to kill children in
Gaza.
Here is Nikki Haley signing bombs that were
used to kill children in Gaza.
And here's what she wrote. Finish them. America.
Love Israel always. Aww.
I mean, it should make your skin crawl.
These people are monsters.
But here's Tucker Carlson screeching about Ukraine while
the person that you wanna vote for is
going to continue supporting Ukraine. Whatever you thought
he said when he said it would've been
over if I was there, and I'll do
it like this when it's my time. And
it just means it's not it's a meaningless
statement. And I'll I'll end it my first
day in office. Sure. We'll see how that
works out. The bottom line is that he
will do everything they've already done because he's
the same thing. I hope I'm wrong. I
hope you're right. But I think we all
know in our hearts that's the case because
it is always what happens. Look at the
last discussion.
They did the end. He's he started out
by all about the wars and stopping this
and stopping all the forever war stopping the
what did he say, he didn't say forever
wars. What was the term he used? But
in any case,
he gloats about continuing them. The war state.
All the thing because he's the same person.
Now here,
As they're signing those bombs, minus Tucker chooses
to have selective outrage for some of them
and not others, here is what an Israeli
MK said. This is back in May, June
2024. But this is my point.
If you actually care to look, these people
will scream the quiet part out loud. Because
I don't even think they understand that it
should be the quiet part. I think that
they they they believe this is what they
want. They I mean, look, you could I
I I should even avoid this speculation, but
I I think at the end of the
day, what this shows you in my opinion,
clearly they believe this. They believe they're superior
to these people. They believe that they shouldn't
exist. They believe that the child is guilty
as she herself has said twice in the
Knesset. That you're born in Palossa, you're guilty.
But the point is that they it shows
you that they know you know it's wrong,
and they don't care.
They blow they gloat about this. And then
the western media lies about it for you,
and Blinken lies about it. She says, quote,
the US is threatening not to give us
precise missiles. Oh, yeah? Well, I got news
for the US. We have imprecise missiles. I'll
use it. I'll just collapse 10 buildings in
Gaza. Ten buildings. That's what I'll do.
That's literally what she said.
This is a child, guys. Like I've said
many times, this is what it looks like
to gain this much power without earning it.
And that's just that's something you point out
for a lot of US politicians, quite frankly.
But this is an entire this is what
Zionism is.
They're children. I mean, it's disgusting the way
they act. They are everything the world should
reject.
Now it doesn't matter what ideology, what religion,
if you act like this, the world should
resist in I mean, should reject everything that
you are.
And yet, they send more bombs. They send
more weapons. They sign them. They continue to
completely align with what they're doing and they
pretend they don't want to. Now here's a
sad video that I wanted to play, and
we're gonna show you some things from Gaza
before we finish with Lebanon.
No worry. Now this is from yesterday.
Now as we're watching this continue, I want
you guys to remember, because we're gonna get
into Lebanon. But what's going on in Gaza
has not stopped. They're still bombing.
You know, we could talk about safe zones,
but that doesn't matter because they're bombing everywhere.
There is no safe zone. They're bombing literally
everywhere. Increasingly shrinking locate you know, dramming them
into the river or anywhere else, starving them
to death, which is still happening too. I'll
point this out next.
Creating disease.
Remember,
I think something like 60% of the population
is suffering from some kind of illness. Some
kind of rash or disease. Some kind of
many of them life threatening, especially
with no medical treatment.
And now they're going to do the same
thing in Lebanon be and they're telling you
that. And your so called leaders
want you to think not only it's okay,
but it's virtuous.
It's what we should be doing. And you
don't think that's gonna change the planet
forever?
This is a more important situation than I
think most people realize.
This is the problem of our time.
We need to take a stand against what
is changing right here or we will never
come back from this.
Here is what somebody just showed,
Saving children in Gaza who were buried under
the rubble because Israel continues to indiscriminately bomb
civilian buildings with no justification.
What you're gonna hear, sadly enough, if if
if it's on podcast, if you're gonna watch,
is somebody who spent 20 hours
trying to dig these children out of their
home.
And sadly, they died right before they got
to them.
Him.
You'd imagine the courage of these people.
Oh.
I'm sorry. You'd have to watch that. The
reality being that these this is
every day, over and over.
Every building, every family.
They are liter I mean, this is why
even a a new Guardian report is at
least suggesting the numbers could be upwards of
you know? I mean, look. The the number
the even from the Lancet report, we're talking
100 of thousands of people here Buried, dying,
sick.
It's just so unreal that we have to
live through this while we all I mean,
the the world sees what's happening.
I think that that sound of her last
breath will live with me forever.
As if we couldn't do enough to stop
that. This is what we're fighting for, guys.
We're fighting for human life. We're fighting this
is the idea of what Macklemore was saying
in the first place. This is the resistance
that we're we are fighting against the reality
of evil in this world. Now that doesn't
mean it's gonna stop, and then whether you
win or not, there will always be people
filling that role. That is the way the
world works. That's why it is always it
is always
a battle.
If we let our guard down, people will
fight.
The evil will win.
It reminds me of a of a of
a a a a state of quote from
Bob Marley, I'll probably paraphrase.
You know, the idea that essentially after he
was shot and ended up going back on
stage regardless, knowing that people were still trying
to kill him, When somebody asked him, like,
why are you gonna risk your life? And
he said, you know, because
the people out there doing evil are not
taking a day off. So neither can I?
It really does get you emotional to realize
what that the the the courage it takes
to stand against things like this. And this
is what I talk about with this work
and what you're doing in your life. I
mean, there there will be consequences.
There shouldn't be, but there will be. I'm
dealing with them right now from simply pointing
these things out for the rest of our
lives. And you know what? It's worth it.
It would have been worth it to save
that child's life in my mind.
And these are the people that your government
doesn't care about. They want you to think
are somehow all bad terrorists and it's the
same damn thing you're doing in Lebanon right
now.
And then the point that she adds, that
one of the defense workers said if or
the civil the the aid workers said, if
only we had the proper equipment, we could
have saved them.
They had a chance.
And that's what Israel will never give them.
We'll give them the equipment they need, you
know, because obviously, the equipment that might be
able to move rubble, of course, could be
used by Hamas. We can't give them water
or gauze or toys because Hamas could turn
them into weapons.
It's not a joke, by the way. They've
stopped chocolate. They've stopped gauze. They've stopped crutches.
They've stopped everything. And that's the point.
They're murdering these people in every possible way.
And I'll include this again from the other
day. The report they put out with 649
pages
of all the ages, the name and age,
gender ID number of everyone that's been killed,
which you can verify for yourself to the
turgren of, of course, of the Israeli government
screening about terrorism, you can prove who these
people are. And the first 14 pages
are 1 year old children.
Fourteen pages. Look at the size of that
type, guys.
Fourteen pages. 1 year old children. You know
how far it goes on?
Up to 10.
Think about how many pages we're talking about.
649 pages. Half of it is children.
Explosives dropped on Gaza.
Exceed those, as you guys already know, dropped
on London, Hiroshima, and Dresden combined during World
War 2.
And that's just Gaza.
How do we even pretend that e whether
they even tried to be precise, that that
could possibly be precise? Then you'll get the
mapping of where they bombed in Gaza. Oh,
and guess what? It's literally the entire area.
There's no argument about preciseness. And yet they
still try to shove that down your throat.
Sarah Wilkerson hides out highlights
how they are
displaying the ambulances that they bombed.
Rather, they're displaying the ambulances that Israel has
bombed in the courtyard of the Nasir hospital.
It says ambulances bombed by the Israeli Israeli
government are displayed as evidence of war crimes,
not that leaders care.
Now of course, they're all they're all gonna
scream, so they're using them. Well, yeah. Sure.
If you could prove that, I'd love to
see it. Every time they've pointed at one
of those, it's been later shown to be
a complete fabrication.
Every single time. I'm talking about the corporate
media.
As I've shown, the ones with the pretending
a kid with a bike is a rocket
launcher. I mean, it's over and over
incessantly lying to us, and yet they still
keep blindly taking their narrative because it's not
about them being too stupid to see it.
They're
choosing
to be on the side of genocide.
Look at all these ambulances. 1 after another.
Full of both injured children as well as
medics and nurses that are being killed.
Sarah Wilkinson also highlights that Israel has now
returned, and this happens constantly, this is today,
80 decomposing Palestinian bodies without any signs of
identification.
That's apparently the 5th batch delivered by truck.
Just truckloads full of dead Palestinians. Now you
wonder why so many are missing in Palestine?
You wonder why we don't know where they're
right there. They're kidnapping and murdering
or just torturing and I mean, it doesn't
and it doesn't matter whether they did intend
to kill them or not. They are taking
people and then they just die in custody
and they dump their bodies back out here.
Most of the missing organs, by the way.
That's not a secret. Human rights,
well, Human Rights Watch has written about that
in the past. EuroMed Human Rights Group has
pointed out their own investigation proving this by
she at Shefa Hospital. Doctors at Shefa Hospital
have said we saw them return bodies, missing
organs. Palestinians.
And it's it's as I've said before, it
is an open secret.
That's the image right there, by the way,
in front of the the sheep hospital. Israel's
open secret of Palestinian organ theft.
It is a worldwide open secret.
Both Israelis around the world that are conducting
organ trafficking schemes that tie back to the
government, or explicitly Israeli government connected organizations.
It's everywhere, just like the Human Shield dynamic.
All these things are hidden from you because
your governments don't care. An electronic intifada says
the issue of missing in Gaza is significant.
That's the
point.
A truck full of dead bodies probably answered
some of that question.
So many are missing. By the way, just
like Syria,
there's so many articles written about the just
the missing generation of children from Syria. Guess
who didn't care? The western world.
Many of them ended up in human trafficking.
That's not by accident.
Just log on to Facebook and you'll see
countless posts pleading for information.
Quote, so and so has been missing for
a while, last seen wearing a white t
shirt, and such and such. And look, here,
the point is in the article, the image
they're using is this is what we're they're
doing. Using those human shields. They're and they're
probably getting killed. They're getting killed when they're
done with them
over and over and over.
And then that's not if that's that's aside
to you know, aside from whether they're that's
aside from the starvation point.
Because they're all starving.
1,100,000.
Half of entirety of Gaza is experiencing
catastrophic food insecurity.
But the reality is, they're all at some
level of starvation. That's been re this is
from IPC,
the integrated food security phase classification. This is
the entity to look to.
Every one of them have called this out.
Nobody cares.
And they're telling you right now. The and
the guy I think this one's actually from
this is not issue 97. This is not
the newest one. Is one of the ones
from a f f, where was it?
I'll include it you can look for for
yourself. I just wanna include it for the
point so we rec so I can use
that keep it in your mind. But this
report came out months ago. They're starving to
death. Literally half the population is catastrophic food
insecurity, and your government doesn't care. It's still
sending them weapons. They're still bombing these children
right there.
And then guess what?
It turns out, which you already know because
you watch this show,
Blinken lied. Or rather the US government lied
and made him the stooge to say it.
Agencies found that Israel blocked Gaza aid. Oh
my god. Surprise, surprise. Blinken told congress otherwise,
which allowed them to continue to fund them,
which they don't care. They all knew they
were lying.
But let's go to the actual report instead
of ro the,
Rolling Stone. Pete, Prem Thacker points out this
is a huge scandal. It is. USAID, which
is my point from before, they are not
an aid. They they are a front for
government
for the defense department.
Then, yes, in some cases, individuals do carry
out acts of aid, but the point is
that they do not that's not their ultimate
goal in my opinion.
And here's the case. USAID and the state
department,
refugee bureau both said Israel blocked aid to
Gaza. Oh, I'm sorry. I was thinking of
I think there's another point.
Anyway, I'll come back to it. The point
was, there was a secondary point about USAID
being involved with the regime change. That's why
I was setting it up earlier. We'll come
back to it though. This one where was
I? Here we go. It's just about them
acknowledging the point, but which is that ultimately
we already knew this.
They're blocking the aid. I mean, guys, a
child knows this. Their own media is calling
it out. But all you're getting now is
that they're simply going, yes. We know that.
But guess what doesn't stop?
The weapons transfers to Israel. They're happening right
as we speak.
So now the u the state department have
said, yes. They're doing that. Blinken told congress
the opposite. So they wouldn't have to heed
US law that would force them to cut
off weapons.
So we know this. It's out in the
open. Blanken is Blinken in jail? No. Are
you still getting on weapons? Yes.
So all this is is what revelation of
the matter? I don't know. What whatever you
would call this. It's showing you that there
is no mechanism through which these people are
bound by the law. It just doesn't happen.
That's the question right now of our time
as Americans. What do we do about that?
How do we change that? Voting for Trump
or Kamala is not gonna do anything. It's
gonna enshrine the problem, which is what they're
hoping for. But here's ProPublica. You can read
it for yourself. Israel oh, and where's the
actual I'll quickly read this. This'll be quicker.
What what he highlighted, just to show you
that it's in the article, it says the
US government's 2 foremost authorities on human humanitarian
assistance
said Israel deliberately blocked aid. This is not
new, by the way. So they knew it,
didn't care. People resigned in protest from the
state department for many reasons, and they still
didn't care. Their conclusion was explosive because US
law requires the government to cut off weapons.
That's why they lied about it. Blinken
and the administration of Joe Biden, and it
would have been Trump if he was there,
Count mark my words, did not accept either
finding.
Israel deliberately blocked humanitarian aid in the Gaza.
2 government bodies concluded that. Blinken rejected them
both.
ProPublica broke this down yesterday.
Again, same point.
Did did did the Earth shatter? No. Did
something change? Nope. Everything's going exactly like it
did before we knew and we already knew
this. Already knew it.
So speaking of that discussion, so half of
Gaza is literally catastrophically starving, the rest is
starving in a lesser degree.
You've got the deliberate example, the oh, the
admitted example that they're blocking aid to people
who are starving. But you know what that
also includes? All of their hostages.
So there's no way to misunderstand that. As
they are bombing them, as they are shooting
them, they're also starving them. There's no way
at this point you could pretend like that's
an accident.
That is a deliberate choice to just kill
everybody. Because that's who these people are. Both
Israeli government and the US government. Mohammed Shehada
points out, Israeli ex hostage, lifts shits, we've
talked about before.
Says Hamas, and this is a new article
by the way. She was the 4 of
the I think the first one released who
then said, they treated me kindly.
And they hated her for it. Zionists were
calling her a traitor.
Because showing you it's totally about Judaism, right?
Clearly. No. It's about Zionism, and that's the
point. You go afoul of them, it doesn't
matter who you are or what religion you
have. It's about Zionism.
And she said the truth, and you're not
allowed to do that when it she hurts
Zionism.
So and same thing with Trump and everybody
else. There's not a there's not a there's
a reason those overlap.
Right? The whole it's just it's politics in
our country. It's the same thing. Which is
run by Zionism. They're clearly going, you you
can't say that because that hurts Trump. You
can't say that, it hurts Kamala.
What she's telling you now in a new
article is that they already tried to release.
She says Hamas offered,
which you already know, by the way, we've
covered this extensively,
unconditional
release.
And another woman as well, in the earliest
days of the war, but Israel refused.
We already told you this. Now she's publicly
admitting it. Why? Because the entirety of Israel
is highlighting that
I mean, I'm a little bit hyperbolic. The
the majority, clearly, of the media and the
people in the streets are highlighting, not because
they care about Palestinians by and large, but
highlighting that they don't care about the hostages.
And all they can do is scream, your
own represent your politicians in the United States
are screaming at you that we have to
fight for them. We're they're not fighting for
them.
Says Hamas then said they would drop them
at the borders.
But the IDF had declared it a death
zone, and so they weren't able to.
That's the exact that's explicit stated by an
Israeli Jew who was a hostage.
Israel stopped them from being released.
Now there's a recent point about some fake
deal. Now remember how this all went. Multiple
times, they've accepted the deal and Israel is
the one to buck it, and everybody lies
for them because they're either compromised or agree
with the agenda.
So now it came to a point where
everyone in Israel is going, take anything. It's
your fault. We all know that. Take anything.
The western media lies to you about what's
happening there, pretends that we're all stopping it,
Hamas won't accept, and then just keeps this
dumb cycle where everyone can see clearly who's
at fault.
So now, they say Israel official confirms a
deal proposal.
What do you mean a deal proposal? The
point is the deal was accept I mean,
every time there's something, they simply lob in
some new thing that nobody would accept. And
now they do it again because you shouldn't
need an answer. You already know exactly what
they're doing. They don't want them back. I
think they want them all killed for countless
reasons, but you can decide for yourself. At
the very least, they did this yet again.
Now Netanyahu
put out his own statement that literally says,
the fact that the prime minister Netanyahu was
from the prime minister's office, so it's kinda
framed as a sec third person. The fact
that Netanyahu accepted all the American proposals for
the release, despite an ultimatum from coalition officials,
completely refutes the claim that the sabotage for
the deal. See, he's acknowledging that even the
US media, everyone, even Israeli media, which I've
already shown you,
is clearly calling him out. How Netanyahu has
systematically
foiled talks to release hostages. And this goes
back to the 1st few days post October
7th. Both 9th 10th, Hamas offered a full
exchange of civilians,
and they said no. And they lied about
it. Everyone knows that now who's paying attention.
So he put this out,
saying, we're lying, because what else you gonna
do? And it goes on to say,
basically, the the the minister agreed, United States
proposal,
and ham and Hamas refused them. So he
added new information.
He forwarded the mediators an outline for the
release of the of basically a new a
very generous proposal, which despite the fact that
everyone had already agreed on the one they
already sent forward, so he adds a new
proposal and then goes, they didn't want it.
You know why? Because it was re it
was ultimately the ark the deal was,
you leave,
and we do an exchange,
and then it's over.
But wait, but ham Hamas, or Palestinians, are
fighting for their self determination.
They're first and foremost fighting for a ceasefire.
Right? And they said they would end the
war, which we'll get to in a second,
if they actually pulled out and stopped bombing
Gaza. But if to agree for Hamas to
leave, which is what they're ultimately saying, you
have to leave the country, well, all that
does is leave Palestinians under the rule of
of of Israel.
So everything is for is moot. Everything is
meaningless. And so the end of the day,
he knew that they would say no. And
so the only person yet again creating a
dynamic where it causes that to happen is
Israel.
And you have to realize, even if you
agree with the dynamic of what he's putting
forward,
the Israeli population doesn't.
They don't want that. They're screening. Take anything
that gets our families back. And he said
no.
Then he puts over a fake deal that
he knows they're gonna say no to, and
then everyone blames them us in circles that
no one's listening to anymore.
It's almost cartoonish.
And that's what Caitlin said. And here's here's,
you know, the dutiful Wall Street Journal blindly
lying about every. This is what all the
media does when it's necessary.
US officials concede Gaza ceasefire out of reach
for Biden.
Out of reach.
And it says, stop call oh, and then
she says, a catastrophic legacy defining failure. And
she says, stop calling this a failure.
Biden Harris did not fail to negotiate a
ceasefire. You could only fail at something you
tried to do. They didn't fail, they succeeded
at their goal of helping Israel destroy Gaza.
100%.
As always, I believe very clearly that if
if if not worse, with Trump in position.
I hope I'm wrong. Hope he comes in
and changes everything, but I don't believe that's
the case. Either way, whatever you think of
that, he she's right. The Biden administration did
not care.
They lied to you. Blinken lied to you.
As you can see here, they've been doing
this from the very beginning.
As well as this, don't
forget, the Canadian news saying defeating Hamas was
priority. Everything else is secondary, says Israel.
That's on October that was, like, October 11th.
They said that. People don't have the short
memory, it seems. Omar Bedard points out, Israel's
massacre in Gaza has killed more Israeli hostages
than it has rescued. That's a objective fact.
Including Israeli hostages waving white flags getting shot
by their soldiers.
For those that may be suddenly pushing back
on that because it sounds like something you
wouldn't believe, here's the article for you. Hostages
got shot by the IDF, put out SOS
sign. And remember, they shot 2 of them
as the this third one ran away. All
3 of them speaking in Hebrew saying, we're
hostages holding an SOS sign looking like Israelis.
And they shot the 2 of them, missed
the third one. 20 minutes later, the article
points out, they coaxed him out from around
the corner, and he's going, don't shoot me,
and 2 of them killed him.
I mean, I don't even need to explain
that. That's crazy, and it shows you what's
really going on.
They just try to hide it from you.
Ow. We were confused.
But it says, if you want to cheer
on the horrific massacre, at least drop the
ridiculous pretense that it's about saving lives. Here's
what Tal said. Here is why Israel must
continue the Rafa operation against Hamas or rally
all against Palestinians.
2 of our hostages who were held there
were rescued by Israeli forces overnight. That's back
from February.
And that's this is too. And so he's
responding going, let's stop let's remove the pretense.
Okay? It's not about human life.
They killed more people, including Palestinians and Israelis,
in this fake operation.
I I don't even believe they wanted to
save these people quite at all, for quite
frankly.
APAC puts out a tweet that says, free
the hostages.
APAC tracker responds saying, free the hostages. And
shows you the graph of the hostages.
And I I guarantee it's more than 9,400,
but and this is Israel admits this, by
the way. That's my point. It's it's more
than that because that's the number they put
out. 9,400
held by Israel.
Almost all of them, as they've said, in
ministry detention. They're without charge.
A 111.
But the whole world wants to make you
think that one matters more than the other,
because that's disgusting.
And here's even an article from PBS. Israel
says high probability, its own airstrike killed 3
hostages. Even they're having to act backwardly admit
it because they are failing.
Now on top of that, I think it's
important to point out that because of all
this, because of how clearly they're losing control
or straight up lost control,
well, guess what else they're gonna do? They're
they're gonna triple down on the atrocity propaganda.
Here's one of the most obvious propagandists in
this conversation, David Collier saying, just watched a
pre screening of a documentary covering the Nova
massacre.
You know, the the location where they moved
to be closer to the fence knowing this
was happening and then use them as human
shields and then actually use them as secondarily
as human shields to fire at the Abbas
members while the IDF came to, quote, rescue
them. Right? Countless examples of how they in
fact killed them. But, yeah, let's let's pretend
this is gonna be what you think. He
says, surviving October 7th, we will dance again
is what it's called.
It will be shown on BBC 2, Thursday
at 9. It's truly horror how ring or
harrowing. As for Hamas, I hope every last
they burn in hell.
Well, simply I said, well, get ready for
Israel's atrocity propaganda stuff film part 2.
I've I guarantee you it's gonna be the
same clips they've been using from the beginning.
And it says it is I I wrote,
it's wild to me. With the sheer volume
of verifiable lies the Israeli government has been
caught spreading,
by even their own media since October 7th
alone.
That anyone even pretends that they're a credible
source on anything. Let alone the Hannibal event,
which is what I'm calling the obvious discussion
of October 7th. Because it's been proven
that they ordered the Hannibal directive even by
their own media.
This shit is wild to me how clear
this is.
Let me let me preface these remarks with
I never
never ever believe
Israeli figures.
I've been in the government too long to
know that the Israelis are patent liars.
Now, of course, Elon Levy jumps to like
a puppet on his strings because that's what
his job is, to scream the things that
have already been proven to be false.
What what a useful fool. Like, he must
be I mean, think about how these peep
I mean, you know that. You know we
see this. This is a this is something
he tweeted back on November 1st 2023.
Guess who it is? 1 of these I
think that's the or one of these tangential
groups who have all been exposed for lying.
This explicitly.
Here she is saying, they cut off an
8 year old girl's hand and they lay
in the blood and it no. False. Even
Harratt has proven these are all false claims.
But he goes, I just heard the testimony
of the civilian volunteer who prepared this little
girl's body.
They I mean, what else are they gonna
do?
So when you know that everyone sees what
you're doing, you just have to grasp for
some shocking thing that's gonna scare people back
into line. It's not gonna work.
But as Ahmed said, I do recall that
investigation from the Israeli channel, interesting to watch.
And that's the investigation that says, an Israeli
journalist from channel 13 news has refuted the
claims made by the military regarding alleged crimes
committed by Hamas, which were published around the
world. You've seen this. We talked about it.
It's a long 4 minute view. This is
an Israeli journalist from channel 13
proving that's a lie.
All of these claims.
Babies on a clothesline, baby I mean, every
one of them. The journalist highlighted a particular
incident involving a, commander who spoke to another
channel giving details in the event along with
killing of 8 babies. I mean, all these
things. And the point is, they're false.
Fake.
This one's this is this is this, tweet
is from January. Remember, Haaretz, Times of Israel,
I mean, countless. Even the time I mean,
what was it? Was Was it not was
it New York Times? One of them, even
even aside from their rape hoax scandal, has
come out and pointed out that these were
lies. And they were. It's obvious.
If Israeli media, independent media, and even like
Greystone, Manda Weiss, intellectual electronic intifada I mean,
you realize this comes from statements from Israeli
witnesses.
Didn't happen. Khaboosse Perey? There's only there was
only, I think, 2 or 1 or 2
children that were killed in the entire dynamic,
and none of them were in these locations.
None of them were in ovens. None of
them were taken out of a woman's body.
They they've lied about all of it. And
yet, we're still pretending like we can even
take anything to say at face value?
So here's is this September 22nd? Elon is
putting this back out into the field. And
this. Or actually, no, this was another statement.
Richard says, are you seriously repeating these lies
again?
Here's another one you promoted. One of your
most ridiculous, but that didn't stop you. Here
he is saying, gal got it, acting academy
alumni.
He says, they deleted this bizarre skit lying
about another homos atrocity without proof. They deleted
this. It says, we asked him what was
it again?
Yeah. I I remember covering this when it
was the time. So he they used this
guy,
and they literally talked about chopping people's genitals
off. And just these 2 weirdos collecting in
the spot and talking about something they've seen,
it was false. They deleted the video.
I mean, think of how gross that is
to sit there and just be like, hey.
Let's let's do a video in this this
resort, and and pretend that we saw genitals
being cut off. Like, you know what that
says about these people individually?
It's just so horrifying to me that these
people even exist.
But the point is they're lying, and he's
doing it again. Because clearly, that's his job.
Hope that sits with you forever, Elon. And
then and again, he says they this is
the another one. Tiberias says, in response to
the Netanyahu on September 22nd.
Saying October 7th, the mass terrorist monsters burst
in Israel, murdering our people. Raped, beheaded. Guys,
this is September 22nd.
Netanyahu is just you know, I double down
is the way to say it, because there's
no triple, quadruple. But the point is they
just keep doubling down. They just keep doing
it.
Everyone knows the beheadings were lies. The rape
stories were lies. They've lied about everything. I
shouldn't say everyone. I'm being hyperbolic. But anybody
that is engaging with the evidence, the current
level of evidence, everything they're pointing to from
the UN investigation down has proven the opposite
of what they're saying.
Pramila Patton even went on to put out
another report
telling saying that they're raping Palestinians.
Not that we saw a fact evidence that
might mean that, but provable evidence.
Her investigation on Israel's claims concluded they lied,
concluded that it wasn't even a real investigation.
They lied about that too. But here he
is on September 22, 2024
reiterating the lies, even burnt babies.
It's just incredible that they think they can
get away with this. And he says there's
Tiberius says there's no evidence whatsoever of any
of those things.
This is Nazi level propaganda.
Wrapped in Nazi level propaganda.
And then, Elon, because he's just ridiculous,
decides to double down. He says they literally
tried to sell this person's head. It was
found in a freezer. And then I I
love this. I just I mean, I I
I
continue to claim that this is the wrong
he says, forensic archeologist identified the ashes.
Because he's just an idiot. I mean, quite
frankly, I don't the an archeologist would not
be involved with an event that took place,
a week before.
He's just he wants it to sound legitimate.
If you I mean, I think oh, actually,
I did I did that right here.
An expert who applies archeological methods to principles
to investigate crimes, typically involving human remains or
buried evidence. When you read what they're talking
about, excavation,
examining the environment, we're talking about old
not ashes from a body that was burned
3 days ago, or that that you burned,
by the way, with your own ammunition.
So he's just he's just just idiots. But
the bottom line though is he's saying, we
we our our people that we paid told
us what we wanted to hear. See?
The point is the evidence has now come
to even though we're saying it now in
September September 24th,
their own media has already broken this down.
And here's a Jewish podcaster saying, don't even
get me started on the rapes because that's
what he said. Don't even get me started
on the rapes.
It is a cartoon, a living cartoon. But
she says, because I'll need a moment to
make up horrific stories because there's zero evidence
that we are blocked in outside investigation.
Also, they burnt people from
the burnt people were Israeli Apache helicopters.
They killed their own citizens.
This is this she's an she's a Jewish
person who is calling out Israel, just in
case that's unclear.
But apparently, that doesn't matter because everyone attacks
her for being a non Jew because it's
only about Zionism.
Here we are. So before we talk about
Lebanon, I wanna make sure we establish some
important things.
Here's Kylie Willis, who's just one of these,
I I believe, just a, you know, paid
podcaster who just has no idea what you're
talking about around anything, let alone Palestine, Gaza.
But she says, Hamas. And then she goes
through each one and gives you the statement
that she wants you to think. Hamas, we
will repeat October 7th until Israel's destroyed.
Nope. It's not what it said. And also,
Hamas is funded by Israel. But Hezbollah, our
fight will end only when Israel's obliterated. No.
We'll get into what they actually are saying.
Houthis, death to Israel, cursed to the Jews.
Just so grasad how embarrassingly uninformed people are
or choosing to lie.
Terrorist simps will have peace when Israel stops
fighting. Okay. Well, let's look at these things.
Okay. Well, first of all, here's I knew
it would lose the highlighting, so here it
is right here. In recent weeks, and this
is from, PBS, and it's just common knowledge,
Israel has shifted its focus from Gaza to
Lebanon.
Hezbollah
has publicly and repeatedly said that it would
halt its attacks if the war in Gaza
ends.
So, of course, you could say they don't
mean that or that's not what they think,
but what she's telling you is what they're
saying, and that is not what they're saying.
That's not what they said. It's not what
they're saying.
So if she wanted to say, here's what
Hezbollah secretly thinks, that'd be different. But it's
not so she they're just blatantly lying to
you. Or rather somebody seeding her things just
like John Fetterman and the rest, who they
just clumsily put out there, or somebody else
writing their account. Who knows?
Okay. So Hezbollah didn't say that.
Here is hey. There's John Fetterman right there,
the mindless fool himself. And he says, for
the 2nd day in a row, I endorse
what Hezbollah is doing. So I said, thank
you for admitting that you support terrorism. Or
excuse me. I've said it backwards. Endorse weapon
weaponizing Hezbollah's tools of terror. So he endorses
the acts taken against Lebanon under the guise
of fighting Hezbollah,
which is terrorism.
Using pagers to explode. I mean, everything about
that was the definition of terrorism.
And I said, thank you for admitting that
you support terrorism and the killing of children.
We already knew that though.
This person says, no. That's Hezbollah and Hamas,
you ignorant muppet. And I I said, you
mean Hamas that funds it the Israel funds?
That Hamas?
Oh, weird. He didn't respond.
I'm shocked.
But, of course, that's the point. So here
she is going,
Hamas said, we'll repeat this until okay. First
point is obviously if you think that's what
they're saying, then why don't you blame Israel?
Seeing as how they funded them, here's 2020
where the Mossad chief went to Qatar to
petition them to continue funding them. I don't
need to play all these again. I've played
them a 1000 times. Here is the former
Chindet head and the former prime minister saying
they gave them suitcases full of cash because
they wanted them to be to to divide
Palestine.
Here is Haaretz on October 9, 2023 telling
you that is Netanyahu explicitly said, we need
to keep funding Hamas because it's part of
our strategy.
Okay. On top of that, the charter that
they currently have explicitly says the opposite of
what she's saying. Hamas re and this is
from the the,
hold on. How's that? Oh, there it is.
Jewish virtual library.
And it says, as you should know and
again, to be clear, the point is this
was updated in 2017.
Now there are different versions of the past.
Well, let's not forget, if we know that
Hamas has been funded by Israel, and I
think post 2006 is when things started to
shift. And I argue that there's been differences
of power influence on the overall that that's
what I think is happening here. Either way,
whatever you wanna claim, the reality is this
is what they're currently saying, which is
and it wasn't just after October 7th, Hamas
affirms that its conflict is with the Zionist
project, not with the Jews because of their
religion. Hamas does not wage a struggle against
the Jews because they are Jewish, wages a
struggle against the Zionist who occupy Palestine.
Yet it is the Zionist,
which is important to point out, who constantly
identify Judaism and the Jews with their own
colonial project and illegal entity.
Their point is, it's Zionism that put Jews
at risk. And they're not targeting Jews, they're
targeting the Zionist entity.
Now if that happens to be a Jew
acting in the IDF, because they're put that's
a different story, or a Christian for that
matter. The point is they're fighting Zionism.
She just doesn't care. And then of course,
the Houthis. That's the stupidest part.
The reality is that there is no evidence
whatsoever that they the point is, yet again,
and this is just public knowledge. They stated
this repeatedly. The Houthis
have stated that they will end their blockade
of Israel when the war stops.
But she wants you to think death to
Israel, curse the Jews, like we're in some
cartoon.
I mean, it really is sad. And the
reality is clearly when Israel stops fighting as
they've even express
I can't talk. Explicitly stated, yeah, then it
would stop.
But she wants you to think that's cartoonish
despite the open statements. I mean, it's really
embarrassing what's going on right now, and how
many people are falling for it. So I
recently talked about the pager attack in general.
And I wrote I did this in a
2 part thing. I put Israel's infiltration of
US tech in light of the Lebanon pager
attack.
So the point was that not only was
the the pager attack just absolute terrorism in
every possible way, but the in light of
that point, we've let's reflect on the infiltration
of US tech, and it's terrifying.
What we talked about, Comframe, Carbon 911, the
Unit 8200 influence, the overlap of Erik Prince,
the fake MAGA
privacy phone. All this is Israeli tech infiltrating
specifically the right at this point. And we
just pointed out another neocon that's been screaming
about going after the right and with for
precrime and all this, he was literally informing
Trump about Iran.
It's all the same thing, is the point,
if we're actually recognizing that it's not one
versus the other. It is all it's your
government versus you. But we talked about this
back on 20th.
Then we followed up on 23rd talking about
the important dynamic, which we're gonna briefly go
over again,
that, as I put, Israel caught,
massacring Lebanese civilians, and they're still doing it
to this moment, under the false claim of
Hezbollah tunnels under the homes. They've they just
shifted the narrative right over to Lebanon just
like they told you they would.
Now before we point out that, let's hear
here's Caitlin Johnstone saying. I think this is
important to consider.
And she, you know, kind of in a
way making a joke, but the point is
that this is something to I mean, this
is what's happening. She it's okay, she says.
It's been a few minutes since Israel's last
war. So it's time for us to refresh
the rules. Number number 1.
Recorded history began on October 7, 2023.
Maybe some things happened before that, but nobody
can remember. Number 2.
Rule 2. Anything bad that Israel does is
justified by rule 1. This is true even
if it does things that would be considered
completely unjustifiable
if it were done by a nation like
Russia or Iran. Rule number 3, Israel has
a right to defend itself, but nobody else
does. Rule number 4, Israel never bombs civilians.
It bombs terrorists. If shocking numbers of civilians
die, it's because they were actually terrorists or
because terrorists killed them or because a terrorist
stood too close to them.
If none of those reasons apply, then it's
for some other mysterious reason we are waiting
the IDF to investigate.
Number 5.
Criticizing anything Israel does means you hate Jewish
people. There is no other possible reason for
anyone to oppose military explosives being dropped on
areas packed full of children besides a seething
obsessive hatred for a small Abrahamic faith. Number
6. Nothing Israel does is ever as bad
as the hateful criticisms described in rule number
5. Criticism of Israel's action is always worse
than Israel's actions themselves because those critics
hate Jews and wish to commit another holocaust.
Preventing this must consume 100% of our political
energy and and attention.
Rule number 7. Israel can never be the
victimizer.
It can only be the victim. If Israel
attacks Lebanon, it's because Hezbollah attacked it completely
unprovoked while Israel is innocently minding its own
business trying to commit a little genocide and
peace. If people protest against Israel, bombing entire
cities into dust, then Israel is the victim
because the protest made Israel supporters feel bad.
Rule 8.
The fact that Israel is literally always in
a state of war with its neighbors and
with displaced digi indigenous populations must be interpreted
as proof that rule 7 is true, instead
of proof that rule 7 is ridiculous nonsense.
Which again, was can never be the victimizer.
Rule number 9. Arab lot lives are much,
much less important to us than Western lives
or Israel lives.
Nobody is allowed to think too hard about
why this might be. Rule number 10. The
media always tell the truth about Israel and
its various conflicts. If you doubt this, then
you're likely in violation of rule 5, meaning
you hate Jews. Number 11. Unsubstantiated
claims which portray Israel's enemies in a negative
light may be reported as factual news stories
without any fact checking or qualifications.
While extensively evidence records of Israeli criminality
must be reported on with extreme skepticism
and doubtful qualifiers like Lebanon says, or according
to the Hamas Run Health Ministry. This is
important
to do because otherwise you might get accused
of being a propagandist.
Rule number 12.
Israel must continue to exist in its current
iteration, no matter what it costs or how
many people need to die. There is no
need to present any logical or moral grounded
reasons
why this is the case. If you dispute
this, then you're likely in violation of rule
5. Rule 13. The US government has never
lied about anything ever and is always on
the right side of the conflict.
Rule 14. Americans only.
Nothing that happens in the Middle East is
as urgent or significant as making sure the
correct person wins the US presidential election. Ignore
any inconvenient facts which distract you from this
mission of unparalleled importance until the next one.
Rule 15. Israel must be protected because it
is the latest bastion of freedom and democracy
in the Middle East. No matter how many
journalists it has to assassinate, no matter how
many press institutes it needs to shut down,
no matter how many protests its supporters need
to disseminate to, dismantle,
no matter how many how much free speech
it needs to eliminate, no matter how many
civil rights it needs to erase, and no
matter how many elections its lobbyists need to
buy.
Well put.
I mean, it's just absolutely crazy how exactly
spot on that is. It's wild.
Now
here is what I wanna start with on
this point. As Gallant says, back in November
11, 2023,
think Think about how far that was. This
is the the the even okay. The first
point we recognize, which we're gonna go over,
is that they've occupied Lebanon. Okay. Long before
October 7th, parts of Lebanon are occupied. That's
a fact.
Now
which, of course, gives them the legal right
to arm resistance against military targets. That's the
international law.
For him to say this is because they
were standing against their actions in Palestine. Now,
yes, they were and again, the point to
make is there's been back and forth with
Lebanon long before October 7th, so that didn't
change.
It didn't just begin like they want you
to pretend, as Caitlin said was what? Rule
2? Everything started off October 7th. That's not
true.
So the point is they went some big
action and Israel was occupying them. So no
matter what they might do first, it's still
under the law.
You can't keep pretending these things don't exist.
Now he says, what we do in Gaza,
we can do in Beirut.
Like, this is even before we saw that
flush out to what they were gonna do
in Gaza because he already knew. No food,
no water, no electricity. Treat them like human
animals.
Amalek.
They knew what they were gonna do, guys.
They just your western media and your fake
government lied to you about it because they're
completely co opted by this government.
Either way, now we're seeing this happen.
And the whole media wants to go, we
couldn't have predicted this. Who know? That's all
worthy and justified because Hamas and Hezbollah and
what just it's just exactly what you think
if you're paying attention. He told you they're
committing genocide. We're gonna do it to you
too. You dare you better not speak up.
Oh, you're gonna bomb us? We'll genocide for
you too.
Knowing that the media will back them up.
Now, as Solrod, they'll go through some of
the some of the points we're reporting from
the last show to include for this.
Just like he just told you, we're gonna
do it to you. Well, guess what? He
was right.
Now Israel is using the exact same script
in Lebanon that it used to justify the
total destruction and mass slaughter in Gaza because
they faced no consequences.
The US continues to flow, weapons continue to
flow, media continues to whitewash. Now here's the
Israeli Defense Forces pointing out this ridiculous video
pretending to show you,
of course,
Dana Hogari.
Twitter just there you go. Show this is
sub this is a suburb.
They want you to believe that almost every
house, just like the claim they made in
Gaza, despite weirdly how none of that's ever
been shown to happen. Like the Canadian was
saying, it's weird how these tunnels just vanish
when they're done. Like, what? Are they fighting
the x men? I mean, sure enough. Right?
Might as well laugh about it how horrifying
it is. They just got away with killing
that many people and no one's even asking
for evidence? The rules based order doesn't care?
Yeah. That's something we need to digest.
They're claiming again, look at the missiles in
every single home because of a graphic they
made on their laptop?
Apparently so. Apparently, that's all they need today.
And that's something we're all fighting to change.
That's the bigger point. But, yep, just the
new narrative right over here.
And remember, as PVP points out, it's the
same thing they did in Shefa, which was
proven to be a lie by even corporate
media. They said, look at this big underground
construct. Nope. It was a break room with
a gun on the table. And everybody laughed
at how stupid it was. And Hargary himself
going, there's a list, and it was a
calendar with Abraham with,
Arabic writing on it.
And, you know, Eva Klompas. Nobody's surprised they
used the command center in a yo, it's
a school this time. 3 days later, it
was something else. And it's always the command
center.
They're just children, guys. They're blindly lying to
you. And they know that in some cases,
it's working in the establishments of power, so
they keep
going. Now Censored Man played this clip to
show you the absurd contradiction of pretty much
every basis of every main claim they're using
right now in Lebanon. First, is the fact
that they're using human shields or that they're
using weapons on their buildings.
And the great the clip is showing you
one of their generals or at least, you
know, one of their one of their assets.
He used to be a general, but I
think now he's like a front man for
the government.
Is telling you that well, 4 days ago
4 days before this started, that they don't
use human shields. Up until now, they haven't,
he says.
And his point was,
that's why there's no civilian casualty. See? The
difference is Hamas uses them. See? So he
uses this narrative to make it look like
over here. Like, so the point was to
demonstrate how Hamas uses human shields even though
they're clearly not as everything in evidence shows
you. Not that they couldn't or they haven't,
but I haven't seen a single example. But
we've got about 15 so far from from
Israel that no one cares about. Funny how
that works.
But he's saying, see, Hamas uses Human Shield.
That's why we keep forlornly killing all these
civilians. Whatever. But over here, that's why we
haven't seen over here in Lebanon. Okay. Then
weirdly enough, they wanna go out for Lebanon,
so Daniel Hogari goes, for 20 years, they've
been using Human Shield. Look at the infrastructure.
Please make sense of that. These people deserve
to be ridiculed because they're not lot lot
of them can't talk right now. Not only
my mind's going too fast because I'm getting
long. Not only
that just lost my thought.
Perfect.
I mean, the bottom line is they're using
this, the lies to continue to go after
people in Lebanon.
And they're just using the same construct and
they're using this to continue to murder people
in both places. Like, we need to reflect
on what this really shows you about the
depravity of these people and the governments that
are going along with it.
Take a look at how many civilians were
killed in Lebanon
as a result
as an unfortunate byproduct
of Israeli strikes. And if you compare that
to, the situation in Gaza, I think that
what you will find is it's the same
IDF,
the same operating procedures that we have in
Gaza,
only that here in Lebanon until now, the
situation is that Hezbollah has so far distinguished
itself from civilian population and they haven't been
fighting from within cities. And as such, when
the IDF has deployed lethal weapons against them,
then terrorists have been killed and not civilians.
Okay. So before the next part, so you
realize that if the argument is about just
having weapons in their homes, well, that very
claim right there would have been a lie.
So you could argue that that's the lie,
and this is the truth. But realize either
way, that they lie about everything to suit
their interest in that moment.
So I the are the real argument is
that they're both lies. They're lying about everything.
They lie about everything all the time. It
doesn't mean that they're not that the lie
is there, that they that the the the
counter the other point would be that they
are. It's just the point is they don't
even he's just saying what he wants to
say in that moment to suit his interest.
But overall,
we should be demanding,
Not some cartoon they put out, but actual
evidence, which by the why by the way
damn it. By the by the way, is
the law.
They're required, as everyone told you, the beginning
of the Gaza genocide,
required to prove
that there is
a huge shield or or missile before they
do so. And then every single example of
the controlled demolition of a building as Ritter
pointed out is an example of a war
crime Because it proved they were able to
go into the building, set those charges, and
come back
out, which proves they weren't there.
So it's just again, we already know this
though. I should it's just controlled demolition of
their infrastructure. But they're doing the sanding again.
And for anybody with a heart, with intent,
with passion,
who cares about the law for crying out
loud, should be demanding that they prove these
things. But your governments, the very government screaming
about those very things, are blindly letting it
go.
Always, the point is that they're either that
disgusting human being or that they are compromised.
Probably both, but the compromise part needs to
be very relevant especially as we
blindly walk into some kind of selection process.
For over 20 So again, here's the last
part. And they haven't been fighting from within
cities. And as such, when the IDF has
deployed lethal weapons against them, then terrorists have
been killed and not civilians.
For over 20 years,
Hezbollah has deployed its arms inside homes and
militarized
civilian infrastructure.
It's just it's it's that's e that's how
easy it is. Make another video,
give them the blanket claim,
including human shields, by the way, and then
you just kill whoever you want. Isn't that
the model they just verified? The the the
US government, the very least, completely allowed? Yes.
So at this point, no matter what you
think, the US government allowed this to happen
more than anybody.
And the UK as well as the rest,
but the US government has been the leading
asset in this, if not completely leading the
charge that has allowed this new dynamic. You
don't think that's gonna blow over into other
countries?
Other terrible entities that recognize an opening and
go, okay. I see how the world works.
I see how this so I'm gonna start
taking what I want, where I want. And
as long as I nod to US and
Israel, it doesn't matter. And that's the truth,
sadly enough, and we need to change that.
As a result, the Hezbollah terrorist organization
has turned Southern Lebanon into a battlefield.
Now what's funny is that's the place they
wanted to go. Isn't that funny? So then
once they get
hopefully not, but once they take that territory,
how much you wanna bet? Oh my god.
Now we think it's in this location. Oh,
it looks like the command center for 20
years. They've been using this Northern Lebanon.
And everyone's gonna blind the peep everyone people
that are a part of this will blindly
allow it to continue.
Now Kim makes an excellent point, and says,
uh-oh.
This is Mossad commentary saying, IDF spokesman has
revealed Hezbollah's tried to launch a cruise missile
from a house in Lebanon.
And then gives you another cartoon they create
on the computer.
I I I don't know why anybody thinks
that's even sound like anybody. Even people that
are along with their narrative. Like, that should
be embarrassing for you. That's ridiculous.
And Kim says, uh-oh.
How exactly would they launch it from inside
the house again? Does that does this house
have reinforced floors?
Exhaust channels? A clear exit path?
Mighty militaries can't even launch cruise missiles from
inside a building. Now they're they think you're
so stupid that you'll believe Hezbollah can fire
them from just someone's random house.
She makes an excellent point. Now you may
try to go, well, they don't even care
about the house. That's not the point she's
making. The point is that you wouldn't functionally
be able to work without those things.
They don't care. I mean, so the argument
being, like, that would make I mean, you
could go off forever. The point is that's
ridiculous.
They know they're lying. They know you can
see that if you're even remotely understanding how
this works, but they it's not about that.
It's not really even selling you. They just
need something that's functional. So the complicit genociders
can go along with it.
Now here's the Israeli Defense Force says this
on 19th.
IDF is currently striking Hezbollah targets in Lebanon
to degrade
Hezbollah's terrorist capabilities that apparently just started existing
for 20 years yesterday. For decades, it says
Hezbollah has weaponized civilian homes, dug tunnels beneath
them, used civilians as human shields.
The return of the residents that are home,
we promise.
All these claims that are completely fabricated.
Well, let's talk about the actual discussion of
using this the homes for missiles and so
on. We pointed this out last time. Middle
East Observer
highlights, they put it out 1st here. And
you you basically can see the little pops
going off right there. You see that?
They're dropping what what is being reported, which
does as far as I can tell on
some I've touched base with 2 different people
that would know about this and said that
that's not how that would look.
I mean, especially right there with those little
papa. They're telling that those are flares, as
well as other things they're dropping with this.
So it's what we should be clear about
right now that the Israeli government has been
caught lying by everybody.
So the the last thing you should be
doing is going, that's not can't be true.
The first thing you should be thinking is
that makes sense. Now it doesn't you can
still say maybe it's wrong,
but everything so far before this, every precedent,
every action, every
it's adds up to the idea that this
is exactly what they're capable of.
And what they're saying is that they're dropping
flares and other munitions
on civilian homes, so things pop off and
fly out, and they go, look, see? An
ammunition dap depot. We knew it.
And then weirdly enough, when you go back
and look, there's no evidence of that whatsoever,
which is what keeps happening. And then,
so this silencer points this out. Stay away
from the targeted areas after an airstrike. This
image is from yesterday's raid on the town
of Marche.
The enemy is dropping cluster bombs simultaneously
with the air strikes. So what's interesting is
what they were pointing out
here is just be wary of
stay clear because they're dropping extra munitions. But
what I don't think they recognize what that
does, it bolsters that point.
Right? So, yes, they are dropping these and
you're gonna find them, but that is likely
one of the other things that are being
dropped to make those things look like there's
ammunition.
This is what they're doing, guys. They're sinister.
Now here is Netanyahu
saying in in in his English message to
Americans in the West, which is very different
as always to what he says to the
Israeli population.
He says, the Lebanese people are fighting Hezbollah.
We're with you. Not we're going after Hezbollah,
not you. And the people that are using
you as human shields. The same old narrative
set up.
Except that's explicitly false. Because their own media,
their own politicians
are saying the opposite. Here's the Israeli minister
of education. Says there's no difference between Hezbollah
and Lebanon.
Exactly right on the beginning of Gaza, they
said, we'll let you go back home. We'll
let everything be fine. We know where to
you're not the problem. We're going after the
bad guys. And then, like, 99% of their
population and the and the or I meant
the the government. And then the majority of
the population
come out and go, they're all bad guys.
I'm a like all terrorists.
So he's aiming this at you because he
thinks you're that stupid and gullible.
Prove him wrong. I know he's wrong.
Here's the government of Israel saying they're all
the same. Kill them all. Here is
the in what the corporate media in Israel
saying this isn't it says they're basically saying
destroy all of Lebanon, every single village to
be destroyed.
Break down the rules, their bones as well.
Let's destroy all Lebanese villages.
These people are gleefully laughing about absolute genocide.
And they're being clear. They're talking about civilians.
That's what this has devolved into because that's
what's Israeli government has cultivated in this society.
Let's not forget. The Wall Street Journal back
on
the beginning the be
November 8th.
Israeli foreign minister says displaced Gazans will be
able to return. Yeah. How'd that work out,
guys?
They've already said that's not gonna happen.
So, but Lebanese people need to hear this
because they're not gonna let you come back.
That's the whole point. And Marion Barghutti points
out that Israel gave 2 hours
for the people of this one location to
evacuate,
But then started bombing in less than an
hour.
Because they're torturing people.
They wanna give the illusion of, look, we
got them out of the way. We dropped
this. We dropped we dropped
leaflets.
Talk about that next.
You have 2 hours and they'd bomb in
40 minutes. Because they're trying to make these
people suffer.
As well as the fact, because I'm telling
you this is what it's really about. The
greater Israel project.
BM on Twitter,
who is an Israeli,
anti Zionist Hebrew, he calls himself,
is pointing out, even in Lebanon, it's already
starting.
It's called the movement for settlement in Southern
Lebanon. It's published they published this map. It's
right here.
It's all so many. There's so many
quoted tweets, but this is being publicly posted
to return to the Gush Katif now. Is
that now a complete masonic troll?
Hold my white I I I'm not even
sure the the state the, narrow the
hold my white donkey. I'm not sure exactly
what that means. It's probably a translation thing
or some kind of a reference I don't
get. Either way, the bottom line is this
is a legitimate group, and it's just like
the settlement group that are openly telling you
they're gonna take Gaza.
The point? They're showing you a map of
southern Lebanon and saying,
the new Hebrew names for the settlements of
southern Lebanon.
This is my point of this is what
gets me so frustrated.
We're being told the narrative by both the
Israeli government, our western media, and our own
governments, and it's this easy to prove.
This is these are endorsed entities from within.
The like, the settler these are official entities
of the settler movement that are being the
Ben Gavir and Smotris of the world are
actively
actively working with them, are using them. And
their goal is to take this location. That's
why it's happening. And your governments are just
whitewashing it. And you realize that means they're
killing everybody. They're killing every civilian they can
see because they want to take this territory,
and your government doesn't care. In fact, your
government's saying that's called defending yourself.
Makes me sick. And here's their new logo
right here.
And, of course, it's the Lebanon that whole
tree Lebanese thing with the star of David.
So Zionism has swallowed up this area is
what that tells me. Because the star is
not about Judaism. As much as plenty of
Jews have been manipulating the thinking.
Now on top of that, as Casey Wright
points out, as Kavorka Maciem was highlighting, and
there's an article about it from Consortium News,
Hezbollah warns Israel's dropping leaflets with very dangerous
bar codes.
It says that there's they basically are dropping
leaflets with a QR code, which
how many times I told you this, guys?
Run screaming
from barcodes.
I mean, just literally. Like, anything, no matter
who you trust, whatever. I mean, look. I've
got a, like, a Bitcoin one on some
of the posts we put out. Because that's
an easy way for you to but I
I don't do it. Don't use it. Use
the the numbers underneath. It's only there for
convenience. The point I mean, really, as I
said, I should probably just take it down.
The point is that these things in by
and large are used to manipulate.
You can
very clearly add something. You can put the
sticker over the top of the one you
think you're scanning. It's I mean, I'm not
even talking just from governments. A random person
could put a sticker over that thing and
you're scanning and it's taken stuff from your
phone. Suddenly, you gave your access to your
I mean, it's crazy what this stuff can
do.
Scanning this code, here's one example,
could redirect them to a website that will
install malware on their phone. And you wouldn't
even know.
Then, that malware could be used to relay
relocation information that could be used to target
you.
So the using this to target civilians.
And as Kevork says, Israeli Air Force have
dropped these things. If you're a Lebanese civilian,
don't scan it.
They make a whole post breakdown so you
could read it for yourself. WikiLeaks says, Hezbollah
warns Lebanese public not to scan it. The
code dang it.
Will exact all the information on your devices
and poses a threat to your safety.
So get ready, guys. This is the same
stuff coming towards you.
Now the prime minister of Israel's account
says,
we will continue striking Hezbollah. This was yesterday.
Whoever has a missile in the living room.
So all they're doing is saying, retroactively,
that everywhere we bombed is Hezbollah because we
only bomb places with missiles. So if it
looks like everywhere, that means there's missiles everywhere.
Simple how that works. Right? Sort of like
the Obama era time thing that never really
left, that everyone that was killed in a
place they bombed was labeled as an as
a combatant.
Why? Because that means we only we don't
kill civilians, we only kill combatants. Just so
happens that if we kill a civilian in
an area we bomb, that means they're a
combatant. Funny how that works. That's a real
thing, by the way. That is what these
people are. Doesn't matter how clean-cut they are
or the nice words they put out or
whether they're clumsy, belligerent people like Trump, they're
all doing the same thing. It's just different
flavors of the same agenda that are used
at certain times to get you to do
the things they need. Now the main point,
he says, I told you yesterday to evacuate
your homes.
Yeah, man. That's pretty scary. I'm gonna come
back to this, but ask yourself, how in
the world Israel thinks it has the legit
the right, the legitimacy, the ability to go
foreign country, move out of your homes because
we say so. And then when they don't
move, well, you didn't move. It's your fault.
That's what they're doing.
At least in Gaza, you could argue that
they have I mean, technically, they're occupying them
even though they're not living up to what
that means as a pleasure to occupy. They're
not keeping them safe. They're not keeping them
fed. That either way, the point is they
would have some level of argument that they
have influence over the area. But here,
this is a foreign country.
And they're just delivering evacuation notices to government
buildings. We're gonna get to that. Not Hezbollah,
by you. Lebanese government buildings.
And that's what he's saying, because what was
missile there?
Mark my words, guys. This is a different
dynamic.
Something there'll be people that are gonna if
hopefully this gets staved off, people will investigate
this.
And it your governments will still not care.
But they're gonna prove to you there's not
missiles under every home. It's belligerent, it's clumsy,
and it's desperate. Now here's what the Guardian's
pointing out as of 2 days ago. Israeli
strikes killed 492
in heaviest dailies toll in Lebanon since 1975
to 1990 civil war. Now that's upwards of
500 at this point, but the point is
it says at least 492
have been killed,
over 1600
injured.
So that's over 2,000 casualties.
Lebanese Lebanon's health ministry has said of course,
get ready for the same game they played
before. Well, that that's, you know, whatever the
new narrative will be, whether unrog, hamant, whatever.
Health health ministry, how dare you listen to
them, but we'll listen to Israel's health ministry.
Even though they've been proven to be lying
every 10 seconds at the start of it
or well before.
And I I wouldn't trust Lebanon or their
government more than I would trust anybody else.
But what's funny is you have a very
clear track record. I mean, just the last
few days, you have enough track record to
prove that Israel is not to be trusted.
Harris Wilkerson, yet again. They're not trusted.
But they're gonna go, don't trust them because
they're bad guy and blind mindless followers will
go along. But you should question both of
them is the point. But it says Lebanese
Health Ministry said 35 children, 58 women were
among those killed, and this is the first
engagement.
Essentially, it says we are targeting comp combat
infrastructure that Hezbollah has been building for 20
years.
Despite the fact that 30 seconds ago, you
said they never did that and that's why
there was less over here, but who cares
about the facts? The IDF said that it
hit more than 1300
Hezbollah targets in previous 24 hours. 1300.
That's why they're killing civilians because they're just
bombing civilian locations. They're bombing suburbs, many of
which they're even claiming.
It says, in the biggest attack on the
militant group since the Gaza war began, or
really the biggest attack on Lebanon.
Now it's of course, it says, with Hezbollah
began strikes in support of Hamas. No. It's
in support of Palestinian Liberation.
And that's the whole game they're playing. But
it says Israel also carried out air strikes
on the Becca Valley and its 2nd airstrike
on Beirut in a week.
And that's again, they're just very clearly civilian
locations with what it said was a limited
airstrike in a southern suburb. See, even there
acknowledging strikes on explicitly civilian areas.
But they just say it was a limited
strike. And if anyone pushes, they're gonna go,
well, you know, Hezbollah.
And they're, oh, okay. It doesn't even matter.
It doesn't even have to be proven. Israeli
media reports that the target of the airstrike
was Ali Karaki.
Apparently, Hezbollah is number 3. Like, I just
saw Ben Shapiro put out some absurd little
graph showing,
what's his name? Al Al Bagouti?
No. That's not it. Baghdadi. Excuse me. I'll
be like, Baghdadi was killed, what, 7 times?
I think even now he probably still got
killed or any number of things they've done
like that. They say it when they need
to. The US, same with Israel.
Maybe that last one they said they killed.
The last Hezbollah leader apparently didn't apparently, by
all accounts, he wasn't even killed. But Ben
didn't follow-up on that. They just keep going
with the narrative. Right? Didn't Assad gas children?
Yeah. We'll say that forever despite all the
evidence. This is about 35 rockets were meanwhile
fired from Lebanon towards the Safed area of
Israel, which by the way is an illegal
settlement.
Some claiming coming down on open areas. Now
realize, 35 rockets compared to 1300 I mean,
more have been fired, mind you. But just
comparing that to the back and forth engagement.
This is the same game they always play.
They go look, they killed they bombed a
settlement and we were scared and had to
run. So we're gonna kill 75,000
or 75 or, you know, in Gaza, usually,
100 of people.
And then they go, well, we're defending ourselves.
But how do you even frame that as
the there you can compare the numbers themselves,
and that really shows you they just think
that's what we have to make them pay
for it. And that's the whole point.
That's vindictive. It is small. It is exactly
what these people are.
Now it says Joe Biden said he was
working to calm the situation.
And by calm, you mean arm, fund, and
and and assist? Because that's what they're doing.
Now it says my team is in constant
contact with their counterparts, and we're working to
deescalate.
And by that by that means, by Israel
just told you is through escalation, we're going
to deescalate.
They just think we're that stupid. We're not.
Earlier in the day, the IDF had warned
Lebanese people in Beirut and other areas visa
a via a phone call to evacuate the
residents. What about people that didn't have a
phone? What what about people that didn't couldn't
hear? Maybe they're deaf.
Well, it doesn't it doesn't matter. It doesn't
matter. They just give you a a blanket
statement. We warned them and then killed them
all.
The resident they evacuate their homes
and distance themselves from buildings holding weapons, which
apparently are none. And the bottom line?
They don't have the right to do that.
In any context, you understand. This is not
their country. It says, quote, the actions will
continue until we achieve our goal and return
the Northern residents safely to their homes.
Illegal settlements.
Just so it's clear, by the way, we're
talking about oh, still, I think the highlights
are still there.
We're talking about a specific location, Safed, or
I think it's,
whatever the other the Israeli name for it
is different. As always, they rename them. It's
an illegal settlement.
And
they have been
attacking this location because these are the locations
where these illegal settlers have been like, let's
realize this is the point about, first of
all, illegal. It's an illegal occupation, which again
means the Lebanese
military has the right to respond. Israel is
the one that gave these settlers official capacity.
You can't play it both ways. See, and
that's the game. And so the at the
end of the day, they're bombing indiscriminately
into massive Beirut suburbs and civilian areas, and
they're bombing
military targets, which is reasonably proven, and then
these settlement locations. Now, you can dispute that
that's a problem and say that's against the
law. Maybe it is.
But realize that within the law, military targets
are official.
They are within the bounds of legal resistance
for international law.
And
every way I mean, there's just no comparing
these two stories. If you wanna talk about
no symmetry, it's right there.
But again, the game they play with no
symmetry does not mean the law. That's what
they want you to think from. You can't
apply the law. Yeah. You can. The law
is equal for everybody. You break the law,
you're held accountable. But that's not how it
works. You apply the law unequally to people
you don't like, usually when they didn't even
break the law.
But in this context, what we're talking about
is that Hamas or Israel would be held
equally under the law. They don't like that
though, so they freak out about it. But,
anyway, the point is, as Mint Press News
points out, Hezbollah retaliates, footage shows multiple missiles
launched by the Lebanese group striking Safed occupied
Palestine.
Right? So just realize these are illegal settlements.
So as they're screaming about that, realize what
that means. Wait. They want to fight to
return these illegal settlers to an illegal settlement
that was taken from Lebanese territory.
Or, I I think I can't remember if
this is Palestinian or Lebanese, but the point
is they're occupying both. So based on what
mid press news said, Palestine.
So the reality
is that according to the United States, that's
illegal. The UN, it's illegal. Everyone.
And so they're boldly telling you we're gonna
keep murdering civilians in Lebanon until we put
our people back on this illegal settlement.
And then the US goes, we're fighting for
you. Yeah. Pretty much.
How embarrassing. Like, this is why they've exposed
who they really are. There's no way an
honest person can't see that. And then it
says, these are the days in which the
Israeli public will have to show composure. Oh,
yeah. Just like usual? Take it on the
chin for our genocide.
Right? Or United States, take it on the
chin because Putin. Or really because of their
genocide and what they're doing. Whatever you wanna
call these things.
They want you to accept that you have
to suffer for their wars.
How about not anymore?
It says roads leading out of the South
Lebanon were jammed with traffic as people fled
the relentless bombing. Just showing you it's indiscriminate.
There's bombing locations, bombing roads just like in
Gaza, with areas that have served as safe
zones.
Starting all over again. 4 displaced people since
la la last year, suddenly, in the crosshairs
of the Israeli military. This is the Guardian.
Doesn't mean that means it's true by default,
but realize that these are people that lie
for Israel all the time.
What they just said
is a war crime,
like everything they're doing, but they're bombing the
safe zones for displaced people in Lebanon.
Because that's what they're aiming for. I hope
you see that.
Now it says videos of collapsed buildings and
of bombs falling from the sky,
and the resulting explosions shaking the hands of
those filming circulated on social media as people
tried to track the extent of Israel's campaign.
In one video,
a driver films as smoke fills the air
on the road ahead of them after a
strike. Stop. Stop. Stop. 1 of the passengers
yells as the video cuts. It says, quote,
an important thing to note is that the
roads are not safe.
There is bombing from where we are
all the way to this other location. One
needs to think before they leave the situation.
So just like we're telling you, not only
do they give them 2 hours to bomb
them in 40 minutes, they bomb where they
are, they bomb the road they're going to,
and they bomb the safe areas. It's I
mean, guys, you don't I don't even do
a report. I can just say everything that
happened in Gaza, they're doing it again.
End of report.
It's right in front of you. And even
the Guardians has
enough
I mean, I don't know what you would
call it. Opportunism. But at the end of
the day, they're at least capable of pointing
at this.
People with family and friends leaving the South
made public appeals for any empty apartments or
rooms that could host their loved ones. Spontaneous
invitations and,
initiatives to provide housing emerge with individuals marshaling
calls for available rooms. My point in highlighting
this is what we're gonna get into when
they're screaming about how horrifying it is that
illegal settlers, many of which who are raping
and pillaging and burning people alive,
have to be fleeing from their homes. Just
imagine what that would be like. Well, yeah.
Ask the Gazan population for 75 years. But
now we can ask the lib the lib
the Lebanese people who are fleeing your bombs
as they do so. Not skinning their knees
to sirens and so on. Realize that there
are rockets that are flying, but by and
large, most people are not being targeted. They're
indiscriminately bombing
more than these the,
I guess you would call the front of
the current engagement.
That's by design. Now it says on Sunday,
Hezbollah launched about a 150 rocket missiles and
drones into northern Israel in retaliation for their
strikes. Even even the Guardian points that out.
Hezbollah has vowed to continue
its strikes in solidarity with the Palestinians.
And they put and Hamas, but at least
the point is, they've been very clear about
this. We're fighting for the Palestinians' rights. And
it says a fellow and, of course,
the point is they say they're fighting for
solidarity with Palestinians and Hamas, a fellow Iran
backed militant group, a fellow Iran backed
is is they just again, that's what the
Guardian has to do. It's just these are
these are just other entities that are aligned
in the interest of to fighting for their
self determination like Iran, while they're being attacked
and supplanted and and potential regime change by
Israel and the United States.
And it says, while Israel says it is
committed to returning the Israelis to the border
region. Right? So we're we're gonna keep launching
bombs into your area until we put our
illegal settlements back where they are. So they
can keep raping and privileging and murdering and
doing what we keep doing.
You didn't realize it's not my opinion. Even
the US government was about to sanction some
of these people. But the location they bombed
occupied.
This one says the same thing. The population
of occupied Safed is 42,000
settlers.
Not counting the settlers in the far north
who were displaced since October 8th. Though, God
forbid, they were displaced from their illegal occupied
settlements.
And many of them are, by the way,
sitting in nice comfortable hotels in the middle
of Israel
while Gazans are starving to death in the
streets and did suffering from disease and being
bombed there as well. Quite a different situation.
Right? You wanna hear no cemetery? It's right
there.
He says this means there are approximately 50,000
displaced settlers who have been added to their
list of displaced persons. But he says, the
Zionists will discover after the intoxication subsides that
Netanyahu,
with his aggression
against Lebanon, has actually added tens of 1,000,
if not 100 of 1000, more to the
list of displaced settlers.
Instead of returning a 100,000 settlers displaced since
the beginning. Because you realize his whole point
is we need to return them. And just
like he pretends he's fighting for the hostages,
he's not fighting for these displaced settlers. He's
fighting for what they want in Lebanon, using
them as a scapegoat, using them as an
excuse rather.
And he's just telling you, they in under
the guise of fighting for them, he's caused
more of what he says he wants to
stop. They don't care about any of us,
guys. That's the real point. Now the Muslim
lawyer here we've referenced in the past, that's
his name on Twitter, he points out, in
general, don't forget this, that all over the
United States and Canada, they're selling illegal land
from Gaza already.
And the West Bank.
Illegal property sales. Now we we went over
this a lot in the past. I'll just
include this for something you could take look
into his account because he's covered this a
lot. He's actually gone to them, the locations,
while they were doing it. And they, like,
arrest people or kick them out even though
they're, like, we're here to buy land. What's
going on? Oh, only Jews allowed. That's literally
what they're saying.
How is that even allowed? How is that
possible?
Isn't that against the law? Yeah. It actually
is. And so too is the sale of
illegally taken occupied land. But it doesn't matter.
You I'm sure you could piece together why
it wouldn't matter in this country.
Now Abuya, Ali Abu boom damn it. Ali
Abuneh
Mah points out what Haratz pointed out. After
failing to prevent escalation, the US focuses on
trying to prevent an Israeli invasion of Lebanon.
Now he frames it as incompetence,
which it could be. I'm sure it is
in some degree. But he says poor hapless
United States. I think he just wanted to
kind of take a poke at them, which
I understand.
Couldn't prevent genocide in Gaza. Couldn't prevent invasion
of Rafa. Couldn't prevent massacre of Lebanon. Won't
prevent invasion of Lebanon. Can't stop itself sending
2,000 bombs. 2,000 pound bombs.
He says, what a weak helpless nation like
a kid. And he's just trying, you know,
goading them. But the point is that I
I don't I I think we all know
that it's not I think there's a part
of that for many reasons, including
compromised from blackmail networks.
But it's also that they're a part of
this.
Right? They don't want to stop it, like
Caitlin was pointing out. And I do think
that's a huge part of it. Either way,
why are we pretending like what they tell
us is true? With everything we keep seeing.
I frankly think most people know that already.
Now here's what, anti war pointed out. Lebanon
health minister says, quote, the majority, if not
all,
of the 558,
which is what it's risen to as of
today, of the people killed by Israel were
civilians.
You realize, guys, this will be proven
because this is not Gaza. Okay? This is
going to come out, and this is going
to I mean, I hope this gets a
lot of reach.
They're killing civilians. They're broad stroke just bombing
carpet bombing civilian locations, and we can see
it. They're being recorded, which is what we're
gonna get to because it's not Gaza.
And yet they're just hoping they can take
over before I don't really know what their
logic is here. But the majority, if not
all of them, were civilians. Now, of course,
Lebanon has an interest in saying that. Right?
So consider that. But the evidence backs this
up.
Now here is what Blinken said. With everything
we just showed you, and worse yet to
come,
with the with the act of the pager,
the the terrorist act of putting explosives in
civilian devices that would drift it for 5
months all around the world, mind you, ended
up in Syria, probably were in cars and
planes and who in who even knows the
full reach of it?
Everyone withstanding in the international community and international
law,
other than the Israeli US compromised entities, were
explicitly saying this was a crime. It doesn't
even matter who commits it, where it happened.
This is the textbook example of terrorism. And
by the way, just like that clip was
showing,
this is why it started with them. They're
just showing you that this is what they
do. Zionism.
But here's a Blinken set. Showing you that
he's compromised
or simply evil. You can decide. Or both.
We've gotta start with a proposition that Hezbollah
is a terrorist organization. No question. So does
it so designated by the United No question.
You got no we're on the same side.
No question.
What a coward.
It's not, by the way. This doesn't mean
you can't doesn't mean that there's I mean,
the point is you can point out crimes.
You can point out all sorts of things
that you think Hezbollah's responsible for and cultural
differences that you might keep to that level,
like racism. But the point is that it's
not a terrorist organization.
And that's been explicitly stated by many different
people within the international community, including allies of
the United States.
It doesn't matter though, because this is the
only thing you can do to keep the
narrative going. But that aside, and the pandering
from the fake journalist there, he goes on
to blindly support what just happened. Law is
a terrorist organization. No question.
So designated by the United States. And the
reality is it's By the way, which is
meaningless.
So So designated by the group that's committing
terrorism more than anybody in the world. Please
continue. Very legitimate that
Israel do something about, Hezbollah. We'd like Can
I ask you about that pagers attack where
Hezbollah members were the targets and the And
they weren't, by the way? That's already been
shown. More than half of the people that
were hurt were children and women.
And again, this is public information because it's
not in Gaza, but they just don't care
because they're not interested in facts, neither is
this fake journalist sitting with them, whether she
knows that or not, she's going along to
get along.
The point is that these were ended up
in the hands of any number of innocent
people. And then on top of that, even
if it was targeted, Hezbollah, that's there's a
there's a military wing, and there's a lot
of people that work in this organization that
are political, that are aid workers, that are
nurses, that are doctors,
and they know that.
I mean, they literally work with Saudi Arabia
that carry out all sorts of terrorism. I
mean, they they have working alongside groups like
Al Qaeda and ISIS and the moderate rebels
who are explicit terrorist organizations. And that they
want to I mean, it just should be
insulting to you to make these cases. You
should be able to see through this by
now, and I believe most of you can.
They're literally in their hands. Their pagers
exploded.
Some see this as a technological
coup and Oh, on top of that too,
realize that many of them, even Hizbull or
not, were not in a military position.
All of these things are very easy to
prove as crimes, which is what shows you
so clearly people like Blinken are just complete
criminals.
Because it's very easy to see. It's like
killing a Hamas member in their bed. That
would be a crime. The the regardless of
how you rationalize it. Because there is law
in place. So every time they scream about
the difference being that we follow the law
and then they never do, it should make
you laugh,
but, you know, cry at the same time
for what they're doing. And an ingenious move
by Israel.
Others including John Brennan, former defense secretary Leon
Panetta, who you know well saying, it's a
form of terrorism and it went too far.
Where do you come down on it? Look.
Oops. It was muted. And the point is
that he said the beginning there, but the
point is, and you can look at the
segment is they black they openly support this.
They have endorsed this as a in innovative
attack.
Get ready for that to be seated into
your country by s whether it's Israel or
somebody else. Cause they just literally said, hey,
that's completely okay. As long as you claim
you're fighting somebody, and you claim you targeted
it, and they It's their fault, ended up
in somebody else's hands, human shields.
Of course, if anybody did even remotely that
and actually targeted only military personnel in this
country, they would be a terrorist attack. No
matter what.
Just, you know, complete, you know, clearly they're
they're
What's the word I'm looking for? Just, you
know, they logic applied equally, clearly. But it
says, US state secretary of state Lincoln has
just endorsed the Israeli terrorist attack using pagers.
Maimed 1,000 killed
What was it? 20, 30 something?
NBC, so but you you heard it. The
point is, it's very legitimate that they do
something that has blood.
Disgusting.
Here are the people he wants you to
think were legitimate targets.
In some cases. But realize that they're we're
talking about half, which is what it was.
More than half, I think,
were women and children.
Rami Abdul from the Euromaid human rights group,
images of several Hezbollah fighters and rocket launchers
that were targeted by Israel.
He's obviously, you know, being facetious.
These are children that were murdered because of
that attack.
Or rather, I mean, to be to be
not confusing, bomb ongoing attacks on what they're
doing.
They're just bombing locations and killing children. Now
in the pager attack, children were killed as
well.
Now here
is an example of one location.
Now this is just pretty crazy because it's
this easy to see just like in Gaza.
A resident from Southern Lebanon just came back
to his village, and this is yesterday, so
this would have been on the, the
it's posted on 24th
to pick up his wife.
He told the person posting this that he
is now stuck because the roads are too
dangerous.
Here's the video.
Look at look at the surroundings.
There's nothing. This is a suburb, guys. There's
houses. That's just every because they're gonna oh,
well, missiles
and stuff.
You think anyone's even caring to prove these
things? Like, ask yourself this. How would they
possibly know that? Let's just even say you
go back
when the last when they got whatever they
claim they got from that in that video.
Right? They've some internal investigation or some in
in intelligence investigation.
We've seen missiles in the locations. Like, there's
no way that could've been yesterday. Right? So
isn't it at least possible that these supposed
locations are no longer there?
How do they find out?
Is this these are just logical points that
anybody with compassion
or concern for the law would be raising.
And that doesn't apply to these people because
they're monsters.
Here's a disgusting picture. I should've warned you.
I didn't know what's next.
So this is a very graphic picture. And
this is what you're seeing in Lebanon just
like we saw in Gaza.
Greg Stoker points out, Zionists use the racist
term, pollywood,
whenever they're confronted with their try, their own
atrocities, which is meant to imply that they've
manufactured in some Hollywood version, right? Which is
always possible in any context. We know who's
more responsible than anybody. But it says, but
this is Lebanon, not Gaza. They'll have to
come up with a whole new fake film
industry to soothe their consciences.
Most moral army.
It's a demolished person lying on top of
a car in a civilian location because
right? Is there a tunnel right there? Is
there a bomb under the car? It doesn't
matter, guys.
They don't care because they're not do they're
not targeting anything other than civilians.
As Robert wrote on the 23rd, Israel launches
the deadliest attack on Lebanon since 1982.
Now it simply says on Monday, Israel used
Israel decided to launch an all out assault
against Lebanon. They called it Operation Arrows of
the North. It's revenge, what it is, using
the exact same tactics used against the civilian
population in Gaza.
Now it says Israel first began by sending
threatening flyers, which we'll get to in a
second. I wonder where we talked about it.
The flyers with the fake QR code and
text messages
to the phones of civilians.
Now first of all, ask yourselves how they
can do that.
Why is it that Israel is able to
send text messages to Lebanese phones?
Do I need to fill in the blank?
I mean, guys, this needs to overlap for
a much larger picture here. It's because of
the infiltration of tech and the Israeli side
of this. They've they've infiltrated tech all around
the world.
So they could just go, hey. Just hack
that. Give her make give them text messages
because we want them to know what we
want them to know. And how much you
wanna bet they're sending them pretending to be
Lebanese government?
The bottom line is, not only are they
able to send the text messages to their
phones in another country, they're ordering them to
leave their homes.
Why would they listen to that? Why I
mean, especially with what they know they're doing
in Gaza.
Then they started bombing them.
Now let's get into this.
Now I think that okay. This is a
really important point for us to consider because
this goes into so much bigger discussions.
Why or, you know, how is it possible
or why are they able
to send evacuation orders to Lebanese people?
And and and to
other locations.
Like, I really want us to think about
how this possibly makes sense because there's a
huge line being crossed right there. And then
what happens if they tell them to flee
and then they bomb where they went like
they do? And they are.
Right? I mean, there's a whole thing in
there that's very easy to prove and this
will come out as well. But so here's
what you're seeing. And this goes over this
is bigger than just the but that point
alone, I think, really needs to be important.
They're crossing a line there and they're also
telling these people to leave and then using
that as justification for if they die, well,
they didn't get out of the way. They
did it in Gaza too. But you don't
have the legal right to do that. Then
it goes into another point, which is that
they're bombing and or rather, doing this to
government buildings.
Not Hamas, even according to Sky News, but
government buildings. Building
houses
the Ministry of Information.
And a staff member here got a call
this morning from the Israeli army telling her
to evacuate it. But it doesn't belong to
Hezbollah. This is the government of Lebanon.
People are wondering just how far the Israelis
are prepared to go. Yeah. I think we
all know. The fact that it's even posing
that question used to never be allowed. We
know how far they're gonna go. They're gonna
kill them all, if you allow it. Because
that's who they are. Not every Israeli or
every Jew, but the Zionist government of Israel
without question and their complicit followers.
Meaning, the governments do.
But realize how incredible that is. Like, that
that is a government building of Lebanon. Not
only do they order them a government entity
to evacuate the building,
but it doesn't have to do with Hezbollah
at all.
And they and this is my point. So
and then they're bombing these locations, which is
what's happening.
Now on top of that, here's the the
tweet from the prime minister's office,
centred man points out, which had 7,000,000 views
when this was posted.
This was you could see it on the,
23rd.
And says, please get out of harm's way
now.
Once your operation is finished, you can come
back safely to your homes, which we know
is a blatant lie. Not only their home
is being destroyed, but they're bombing them when
they come back, and they won't let them
come back anyway because they want this location
just like they lied in Gaza. But look
at what he says.
595 likes.
7,000,000 views
and 9 the and just another 600 likes.
So not only this shows you 2 things.
1, that the Israelis are like, screw that.
Don't give them their their home attack, but
they don't that's not gonna happen. But on
top of that, that even people that see
this, like, you're not and it shows you
that you don't like it as well. So
nobody likes this. Neither is not the Israelis
who probably from that side I would argue
anyways that they don't want that to happen.
It's my opinion. But on the other side
of it, the rest of us, they're going,
screw that. What you're doing is illegal.
It's just interesting to show how clearly this
is failing.
But yet they're murdering people anyway. Now here
is a a member of the press speaking
directly to Lebanese
civilians. Journalists saying, Mohammed Abu Salama saying,
don't evacuate.
And just like with Gaza.
Right? It's the same dynamic despite the fact
that they said if they don't, that means
they're terrorists. The the same thing they're gonna
do here. What he's saying is they're torturing
you. If you evacuate, they're only gonna bomb
you where you are, just like we're seeing
now. They're gonna they're gonna starve you. They're
gonna get you, and and and they're gonna
psychologically torture you and move you from place
to place just like we saw here. So
stand your ground. Not only do you have
a legal right to, they have no legal
right to port force you out of that.
I think it's important to think about that.
He says, in Lebanon,
documents of all the crimes of the Israeli
army. He said, document that he's telling him.
Use your phones.
Who who's barbaric
and excels at killing innocent civilians. Document all
the events with your cameras and your phones.
Document them. Guys, this is gonna come out.
It already is. For history will not forget
these crimes and for those who are being
displaced.
He says,
this is a message to you. Do not
allow yourself to be subjected to displacement, and
do not allow them to displace you as
there is humiliation displacement, which is what they're
striving for. There is he says,
this is your land and your presence and
resilience in it.
In the biggest challenge of the steadfastness, despite
all the calamities that you're going through
and the suffering from we are here, and
you are in your own place.
Greetings to you from Gaza and the northern
real region. So the point is, of course,
they're gonna try to frame this. I'm sure
somebody are doing as The terrorist telling you
that you have to stay, which is the
clumsy way they made it out last time.
And even though you see the civilians going,
this is our home. We're never gonna leave.
They're like, they're being forced to stay. It's
just desperate lies. It's all they have. But
the reality is that people are largely going
to push back. That's what I'm seeing anyway.
And this this is just the cherry on
top of the ridiculous spot. This is so
insulting.
And it what it shows you is that
not only just extreme desperation.
And I know you all sense that because
it's their failing, they're losing. Everybody sees it.
But how that they always this is what
Elon just did over here with the UN
thing.
He knows you see that they've no care
about the UN. This guy knows you see
that they've displaced entire populations.
But he still wants to pretend that it's
somehow unprecedented
that illegal settlers have been forced to be
away from their homes, living in nice hotels
in the meantime,
for a year. Oh my god. Can you
even imagine?
That our people to be home safely in
their homes, it's almost a year. It's almost
impossible
for a man to imagine. I imagine I
encourage your sky viewers to imagine what it
would be like to be essentially evicted from
your home. Wow. In your home, in our
own sovereign territory, to be evicted from your
home.
I can't even believe that. Like, legitimately, I'm
shocked when I I could I've
usually, there's I just it's such a ridiculous
level to take it.
As as the savior, the quote the the
channel that posted it says. Just he says,
is this some kind of a joke?
He says, there I mean, everyone everyone down
here is commenting the same thing. Like, it's
just embarrassingly ridiculous. Like, in case you happen
to not know, they completely displaced the entire
Palestinian population in 1948 and have continued to
displace them repeatedly over and over ever since.
And since October 7th forward has been on
some psychological terror campaign of moving them from
place to place, sometimes multiple times a day
while bombing them every location.
And he is the gall to stand there
and say, just imagine what it must be
like for these illegal settlers
to have to live in another safe location
outside of there until we get to put
them illegally back.
It's not Gaza, mind you, because I already
wrote about this or covered it. They're living
in hotels. They're putting them up there.
This is just so crazy that anybody pretends
this makes sense.
And then here's just a quick video so
you can see what it looks like. The
Nakba never ended. 1948 compared to 20 24.
It's the same thing over and over. And
he really wants you to pretend like it's
now can you even imagine what it must
be like? Yeah. You're damn right we can.
They're living through it, guys.
Lebanon,
Gaza, they're all living through it. We just
told you that. They're they're even in Lebanon.
They're scrambling, trying to run to places to
live. Yeah. That's going on too.
Only one of these people are illegally occupying
somebody else's territory.
Horrifying.
Now, time, anti war
came out with an article today. Israeli military
chief
preparing for ground offensive in Lebanon. So this
is escalating. So this brings us to today.
To where Israel is openly stating that they're
about to invade on the like, where where
is Blinken and Biden and the rest of
these morons?
What? Red lines. They already pretend there's a
red line in Lebanon, but they didn't care
about the red lines in Rafa. Oh, wait.
No. It's not a major operation. Yeah. So
they destroyed 90% of it, but it's not
major? Got it.
I mean, this is so stupid. These people
know you see them.
They just must be that compromised.
A ground invasion of Lebanon? I mean, this
is exactly what we told you was coming.
And we're gonna pretend they're gonna occupy and
give it back. Well, you know what? The
Israelis have a real great record of occupying
and then giving back territory.
It says,
Halavi told a group in IDF soldiers that
their, quote, military boots will enter enemy territory,
and Israeli air strikes in Lebanon are part
of the preparations for a ground invasion, which
simply shows you, no, they're not bombing this
because of some offer. They're preparing for what
they've always been planning to do. As Gallup
told you back then, we're gonna do what
we did in Gaza and Beirut.
And now they're laying the groundwork to start
the ground invasion because this is part of
a plan.
It says, quote, today we continue.
We do not stop.
We continue to attack and continue to strike
them everywhere.
Just like I said with Trump, these words
mean something. Everywhere doesn't mean some places. Where
there's military equipment, it means everywhere because that's
what they're doing. And they love to flaunt
that to show that we can say what
we're doing and then lie to you and
get away with it. It says the goal
is very clear to return the displaced residents
of the north safely. The illegal settlers is
what he's talking about. To do this, we
are preparing the maneuver, the ground invasion. So
why would you need a ground invasion of
other territory to bring people back to the
settlement? Like, all you would need to do
but their argument is we need to here's
what's here. This is very clear.
Explain for me
how you could
how bombing in this location or invading it
would secure the location they're talking about unless
they held
it. Right? Because right now, they could just
bomb and then put these people back and
defend it. Right? That's their location.
They but that they're not doing that because
their point is these people here want to
attack us. Just like with Gaza. Even though
that's not the truth, they clearly said they'll
stop if you stop your genocide in Gaza.
And so the only logical thing to do,
and this is my point about deductive logic
and how easy it is to see their
lies, is that they take this and hold
it. And I guarantee you, they're gonna say,
until we're sure the threat is over, which
will become 75 years and indefinitely.
I I mean, you know this. I mean,
I don't even think I need to convince
anybody.
And says according to Israel and media reports,
the US is in talks with Israel on
a potential pause in attacks in Lebanon. Oh,
here we are again. A pause, which basically
tells you it will never stop. It's not
a ceasefire.
It's a pause, which means we're gonna go
back to it.
Except and they that there's language like that
for a reason. Now it says since October
7th, US weapon shipments and other support for
Israel have emboldened Israeli prime minister Netanyahu
to escalate
everywhere else.
It's the truth.
Now, let's get into the victimized idea. We
just talked about this. Caitlin Johnstone made this
clear. Here's the fake human rights lawyer. And
I only ever say that because there's no
way this guy could pretend to be a
human rights lawyer while advocating for genocide. Just
saying. But he says, hello. How is your
morning? Arson Atrovsky is his name. He goes,
here in Tel Aviv at 6:30 AM. And
we bought we had to rush our babies
to bomb shelters after Hezbollah terrorist cowards fired
missiles at half a 1000000 people. This is
a war crime. This evil must be condemned.
There's so many points to make.
But let's start with the people said down
below. Let's look, you know, the obvious of
how you can continue to murder children in
Gaza, gloat about it, tell you it's a
good thing, and then cry foul when you
get attacked back. You know, obvious ridiculousness. But
Kim Iverson
says, if we are asked to condemn Palestinians
for putting their children in harm's way, we
should condemn people who move their children from
the safety of Australia to become settlers in
Israel. Which by the way, is this man.
It's truth.
Just like pretty much every one of them
illegally moved because they were told to take
line for Palestine, and have taken land.
And then they claim they're the victim.
So he's she's saying, look, if you're gonna
apply logic equally,
you came from Australia where it was safe
for your child, put there her in line
of fire, and now you blame them for
you being there?
On an illegal settlement? Yeah. That seems pretty
stupid. You'd think a human rights lawyer would
understand international law.
Doctor Amira Dalton says a Ukrainian Australian decides
to move his family from the safety of
Sydney to become Zionist settlers in Palestine.
Bad parent and ideologically brainwashed troll.
Fair point.
This person says, you wouldn't guess from his
sympathy siphoning victimhood post that this putrid soul
champion of horrors
has spent 11 months screaming for more children
to be bombed in Gaza, because he has.
Only a Zionist can be so brazenly bald
faced with their hypocrisy.
I mean, guys, there's no way to misunderstand
that. They have been called they they they
have been telling you that what they're doing
is justified, and now he wants to cry
foul because now he's the focal point.
It's it's it really makes your skin crawl.
Voice of justice says, Hezbollah has been saying
for 11 months,
and the genocide in Gaza. Hamas has been
saying for 11 months, and the apartheid occupation,
meaning then they'll stop what they're doing. Very
clear.
You are a POS demon and your babies
will condemn you and be ashamed of you
if they grew up to survive this. Now
you can decide for yourself if that's the
case. His point is simply that what you're
doing is obviously the opposite of what you're
saying and your child will be ashamed of
you if they have any kind of,
you know, compassion or or morals when they
come back and look back at what you're
doing right now. I happen to agree with
that.
Here's another example. Elon Levy,
born
in London.
And it say he wrote he says woken
up by sirens in Tel Aviv and trying
to work out if it's Hamas, the Houthis,
Hezbollah, Iran, Shia militias in Iraq or Syria
or someone else trying to kill me in
my bed this morning. Of course, wants to
be the victim, except every single one of
those locations has been occupied, bombed, and supplanted
by you and your agendas and the United
States and everybody else.
Look at them. Every single one of them.
Yemen is literally occupied and continually blockade blockaded
by Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the United States.
Hezbollah and Lebanon is literally occupied
by Israel. Iran has been cooed, overthrown, bombed,
assassinated, attacked. What you you point out what
you claim they're doing. They love to play
point at all these groups. But as I
say every time, even though it's not true,
if you take every claim they make at
face value, they still don't even come to
a fraction of what Israel has verifiably done
around the world.
How about Iraq or Syria? You know, both
who are legally occupied by both of them.
I mean, think about how stupid this is.
So you're the one who's occupying everyone, which
then gives them a legal right to do
this.
I'm not bombing his location or a civilian
location. That's not what's actually happening,
but he's playing the victim.
And meanwhile, they're all running to their safe
locations. Mile Gosens are suffering in the streets
and dying as we speak.
But let let's feel bad for this London
guy who wants to pretend he's a za
you know, it's just it's just so embarrassing.
And I'm so glad that people in the
world are finally starting to see this stuff.
Now, Rania Kowalik points out that the White
House says, Hezbollah attack on Tel Aviv was
deeply concerning.
And she says the White House calls Lebanese
resistance missiles aimed at Israeli military installations in
defense of Lebanese civilians being massacred by Israel
terrorism,
which you could disagree. Plenty will. What she
says is provably correct. This word has no
meaning.
The terrorism is the point. The Israelis and
Americans want a world where they can kill
us by the 1,000 without any consequences. It's
unreal.
I agree with that.
And then this person says, should let this
is I think this is a hilarious point,
but accurate.
He goes, well, we should let Hezbollah investigate
itself before jumping to conclusions.
Right? This is what I've seen and heard
for Israeli attacks for a year now. Right,
Matt Miller? Shouldn't we let Hezbul investigate to
make sure we don't jump to conclusions?
Oops. I guess that only applies one way.
Right?
These children.
Now David Roth Lindbergh points out, here are
a few of the plus 500 civilians killed
yesterday
by criminal terrorist entity Israel's indiscriminate terrorist bombings
against southern Lebanon.
It it's ongoing, and you will get people
categorizing and outlining this as we go forward.
They're just murdering children, guys,
Everywhere you
look.
Arson McCroskey again says, we fire at their
terrorists.
Which, I mean, even just starting right there.
You know, just aside from the tens of
thousands of children,
14 pages of just 1 year olds. Right,
arson? But, yeah. But only terrorists. But in
his mind, they are, which is why he's
not a human rights lawyer.
They fire at our kids. Therein lies the
difference. That's what he says.
My god.
And I said, well, you got the lies
part correct.
Are these your terrorists?
These children
you just killed?
Those are the pictures I was showing.
Well, here is a Jewish doctor discussing how
children are being shredded by Gaza and Israel
while barely holding back tears.
How can you look your children in the
eyes?
You absolute monster.
I think it's just it's
important
that we recognize the depravity of what these
people are,
what they're doing, what they're hiding, what they're
a part of.
When were you in Gaza?
End of April for the first couple weeks,
and then there's sniper bullets. I have children
that were shot twice. Wait. You're saying that
children in Gaza are being shot by snipers?
Definitively.
I have 2 children that I have photographs
of that
It's just so hard.
You've seen that many, many, many times. That's
the I included that video in the last
put last link.
He He's literally almost cries while describing the
shredded children, the double tap in the forehead
sniper shots to children. More chill- almost exclusively
children was his quote.
But yeah. But Arsenal wants you to believe
they only shoot terrorists apparently. Yeah. Again,
he actually believes that. And I don't mean
because he thinks they're shooting terrorists. I mean,
because he thinks they're all terrorists.
Just look at what he's been saying.
Now here's Israel, again, the actual Israel account,
just trying to deflect.
And even deflecting to something we know they
were responsible for. Here they go, they go,
some of you have short memories. We don't.
They were murdered by Hezbollah for playing soccer.
No. They were murdered by you, and then
you blamed it on Hezbollah. Robert wrote an
article about it. I said, like everything you're
doing, this is a blatant lie to cover
up that it was actually your Iron Dome
system that killed these kids. Either by design,
which would shock no one sadly, or by
negligence.
And then you blamed it on Hezbollah.
As is Robert's article and Israeli false flag
to justify attacking Lebanon.
And you can look there's been
there's very many examples showing these things going
back from examples before, where the Iron Dome
shoots up and lands in this exact location.
And they do it again, we see the
video of it in real time, and they
just blame Hezbollah.
Because that's what they do.
Now on top of everything,
let's not forget
the many, many, many examples of Israeli false
flags.
Here is a former British agent
saying Israeli Mossad
bombed their own embassy in London 1994,
which by the way is not unique as
you might think.
But the two cases that really got us.
First of all, there was a a false
flag attack in London in
1994
where a car bomb exploded outside the Israeli
embassy in the center of London. Now I
remember this vaguely. This is we're talking 14
years ago. It's a long time ago. But
it was huge at the time. I mean,
it was a huge worldwide story. Yeah. Yeah.
In fact, there'd been, an earlier attack against
some Jewish interest section in Buenos Aires earlier
that year as well. Similar sort of MO,
modus operandi with a car bomb driven and
parked outside that exploded. Very minor injury. Modus
operandi for a reason, guys. That's their signet.
This is Zionism. Zionism is what is created.
This is what I keep trying to tell
people, if you really wanna understand that the
world and the way it is now,
but and and the problems we're discussing, Zionism
is the impetus. That's the problem. That's why
we're highlighting this. It's not about Jews or
Israelis, by and large. Right? It's about the
Zionist influence over all of these things. And,
yes, that seems to be focused on specific
religions and entities, but that's a byproduct. That's
what they're doing.
We need to understand that. It's how it's
important to understand where this all comes from
if we truly wanna change it.
Yes. That was all. Nobody was killed.
And, it was a very sophisticated device. It
appeared to eat itself, eat all the forensics.
Now this is very very rare. Even the
IRA which is a very sophisticated terrorist organization
could not make bonds that,
effective.
So it looked like it, you know, sort
of fairly technical person had put that together.
But what emerged from that,
the senior Mi 5 officer who was in
charge of the investigation into it, and had
seen all the evidence but also all the
intelligence which isn't necessarily admissible in court, wrote
his formal assessment at the end of the
case and he said he reckoned that Mossad,
the Israeli external intelligence agency, had bombed their
own embassy. It's sort of
controlled explosion outside the embassy.
And as I said, that was a senior
MI 5 officer. That was his formal verdict.
If you read that on the Internet now,
you would say that sounds like some mad
conspiracy theory.
But it wasn't. This was the official position
of Mi 5. Right. And he said that
they did it for two reasons.
One, they were always hassling Mi 5 for
increased security around their embassy and other interests
in London because, of course, London
had a a reputation of giving safe haven
to Arab distance from around the world at
that point. See how that works. Right? So
they want something, so we just bomb ourselves
and go, we need now we now give
it to us. We demand it. Otherwise, you're
racist.
As far back as you wanna look.
And Mi 5 kept saying, well, there's no
reason to increase the threat assessment. You don't
need extra protection. So letting off a controlled
explosion outside, of course, they immediately got what
they wanted there. Mhmm. But crucially,
2 innocent Palestinians
were arrested, charged, and convicted of conspiracy to
cause that attack. Every time. And
they were very active in a Palestinian support
network in London. Let's not even forget, like,
the JFK overlap in the same point, guys.
These things are constant.
All the hallmarks of exactly what you're hearing
here applied and what the I mean, so
many different examples we can go off. I
mean, and we probably should do a focus
on just that. Called campaigning for people on
the West Bank and the Gaza Strip and
they were gaining some traction in the media.
They're getting quite a lot of support. So,
by arresting these people and framing them from
attack and sticking them to prison, the whole
network just shattered and has not back on
its feet to this day. So that will
be a clear political advantage.
Right. So the bottom line is just like
we've seen in every other example. The moment
that something starts going in the direction of
the Palestinian interest, they they carry out a
false flag. They blame the they blame it
on the Palestinians. They claim they're terrorists. They
create Hamas in order to justify division within
the group. It's every single time.
And all she's highlighting for you is that
they use those Palestinians. So one, they blame
their own ally to get something from them
instead of, you know and then they blame
it on the Palestinians to slow down and
hinder forever seemingly the discussion of what they
deserve. Because then what happens? The politicians, they're
funding and co and co opting and blackmailing?
They stand up and go, They're all terrorists.
We can't allow this. That's unjustified.
And here we are today, which the next
point will be exactly about that.
Now oh, so this was just the last
two points here. This video is it's, subtitles.
But this is a video that that was
put out, I guess, by,
Lebanese propaganda.
And it's simply saying that your we you
hit our cities, what your cities. Same kinda
thing. Like, goes through and saying, you hit
our airports, we'll hit your airports. That's what
the video is. And it's saying, Hezbollah target
to Tel Aviv? Tel Aviv is not safe.
Settlers leave, it says.
So my point in all of this is
to simply highlight that everything they're doing
is
the bombing, the everything we just talked about.
And so and they stand up and say,
well, we're gonna bomb a city back. And
they go, terrorism.
Now, yeah. Sure. Enough. It's the same point
to make in reverse. If it actually happened
that way and if that's exactly what is
being said, the point is that that makes
them just as bad.
Because you're simply doing the same thing in
reverse, which at the very least makes you
the same. That logic applies
with Israel. And it shows you every time
they do the same thing, they act out
and do terrorism. And usually, it's rooted in
something that you could prove later didn't even
happen. So it simply makes them the terrorists.
But at the end of the day, this
is overlapping with the settlement point and what
we're talking about. 1 are illegal settlements. They
have a legal right to arm resistance. They
gave them official capacity.
And all they're doing is bombing civilian locations
and framing this as their response being terrorism.
It's exactly what happens every time. But the
point is, what happens,
not the statements or the narratives, is what
matters.
An equal application of the law, which never
happens for Israel.
Now I'll this is just a solid point.
And this this was just simply or a
soft MD. This is just pointing out what
settlers are doing. And he simply points this
old video, which I've shown you before, of
a group of Israeli settlers dancing and celebrating
that a child that they killed burned alive
inside of a house they burned down. And
this is a very public story. You've talked
it's called Ollie. They're they're chanting Ollie's on
the grill while stabbing a picture of this
infant who burned alive while dancing at this,
whatever it was. A,
a wedding or something.
That's what they're doing right there. It's a
very cool story. Robert covered it in this
article entitled Israeli settlers consistently use arson attacks
to burn Palestinians alive. Now this goes back
to that story from 2015,
overlaps with what they've currently done since October
7th. That's Ollie right there. They set this
fire this this house on fire, and that
child burned alive. Then when the family was
walking up to deal with this, they were
literally laughing and jeering them. Ollie's on the
grill.
And then that's an example of them chanting
this at a at wedding or whatever, and
dancing and laughing about it. Apparently, Ben Gavir
and others were there cheering it along.
This is who we're talking about, guys. That's
disgusting.
And these are the settlers that they're telling
you are victims right now. Now not every
single one of them, but the point is
that this is where those ones are coming
from. And by and large, what we can
see is people that are acting just like
that. Now lastly, to finish off, as we've
just talked about, here are all I mean,
here's what I in fact, I was gonna
do this. I took I was gonna go
through every single one of these people.
Because this it's easy to do. And I
quickly realized that this is just too much
work for how obvious this is.
My point would be that if you went
through almost every single politician, save for just
a few,
every single one of them
have said, I stand with Israel. Defend Israel.
Why? Because as we just showed you, I
think it was something like 97% of the
candidates in were supported by APAC.
I mean, left or right, mind you.
Even though we're apparently supposed to think one
of them are antisemitic or both, whatever they
want them to, it doesn't make any sense
other than control.
So here's Tom Cotton. Hezbollah unprovoked.
Already stupid. I mean, obvi- I mean, they're
illegally occupying Lebanon, so the game they play
is all life for Israel better than you.
Started launching rockets on October 7th. That's not
true. It happened was it going back and
forth long before that? But it says, no
other country would accept this. Yeah. You're right.
Nobody other no other country would accept Israel
to illegally occupy their territory. And the point
is they just keep getting forced to because
the US government makes that happen, like you.
And it says every casualty in Lebanon is
direct fault of Hezbollah. So it's same game,
same narrative. Doesn't matter. In 3 months, we
have 10,000 civilians. They're gonna say, well, Hezbollah
did it because Tom Cotton said,
that's the same game they did before. Anything
happens, it's because of Hamas, and therefore, the
100 of 1000 killed are just Hamas because
it's that's what we said.
Now Yousef says, if I got a nickel
for every tweet Tom posts groveling at the
feet of Zionists, I would be a very
rich dude.
Get back to work. Your constituents resign. Or
or it says, get back to work for
your constituents or resign. Here's an article, Tom
Cotton. What's the reason for APAC's $4,500,000
support for this young senator? Gee, can you
think of a reason?
I sure can.
Here's Ted Cruz.
This was posted. And these are all posted
these first couple right now. Here's this is
September 23rd.
My statement on Israel's military strikes. He says,
Israel government has the right and obligation to
respond.
Guys, these people are openly supporting the most
vivid terrorist acts we've seen in a long
time.
And now just bombing open suburbs in Beirut.
They have the obligation to do this?
This is quite terrifying to see how,
you know, vile these people really are. I
unequivocally stand with our allies. Yep.
Crazy.
Here's mister Randy Fine. He's one of the
worst.
This is when, peep like random civilians, children,
and women had their eyes blown out by
these pagers.
And this person says, this is what so
many are giddy about? And he goes, yes.
Yep. Eyes away.
Remember, this is Randy Fine,
who has been endorsed by Trump. He's real
proud of that. Randy Fine is a MAGA
Warrior.
He's also a disgusting human being that is
cheering on the hurt the murder of Americans.
That's this post right here from Randy Fine.
There's the American that the IDF murdered,
and he goes throw rocks, get shot. One
less terrorist.
That's an American citizen. Not a terrorist.
Not even remotely. No no one other than
Randy is even I can can I that
I can even see is calling her a
terrorist. That's an American politician not only calling
her American a terrorist, but cheering on the
murder by a foreign government.
What a MAGA warrior.
Here's
Randy Fenstra.
Israel's making our world safer by eliminating terrorists.
September 23rd.
Rick Scott. And this is just one where
he's claiming, these terrorists puts
anti Semitic lies on my door. You know
what it says?
The United States is illegally bankrolling a mass
murder, maiming, starvation, torture, and terror of 100
of Palestinian children. Yeah. Objective fact. And he
says, Americans have blood on their hands. 61%
of American adults oppose sending weapons. Okay. Wait.
Where is the racist part of this whole
thing? The point is, anything bad is real
is immediately racism because that's a lazy argument.
Because that's all they have.
And he's probably being influenced by, I don't
know, money, blackmail, who knows?
The bottom line is that's an objective reality.
But Rick Scott doesn't care because Israel.
Here's Brian Mast literally wearing his IDF uniform.
Shouldn't be uncomfortable at all. Half a $1,000,000
from Israel. And it says, right now, Hezbollah
is partially run by the guys that previous
leadership didn't think were worthy of pagers.
So when when the point is when you
dump pagers in the hands of civilians who
will take them, and then claim it's all
Hezbollah, he's trying to make a point that,
well, now it's the like, this this the
game of taking out the Hezbollah leadership.
I mean, as far as I could tell,
that didn't even actually happen. But Brian Mass
doesn't care because he's a bought off liar.
Here, representative Jerry Carl. We have a biblical
and moral obligation to support Israel. Okay. So
you get my point. I started doing this
and I'm like, oh, my god. Every single
one of them. Here's Barry Moore. America stands
with Israel yesterday, today, and tomorrow.
Here is representative Mary poll poltola.
This is horrific day for the people of
Israel and everyone who hopes for peace. It's
just it's just unequivocal support for a terrorist
country.
Ruben Gallego.
Today marks the 75th anniversary of Israel's independence,
and I'm proud to stand with our ally.
Rick Crawford. Israel has every right to defend
itself.
Doug LaMalfa. Congreg I mean, half of people
I don't even know of. Congress must continue
to stand with Israel. I st I'm a
I was going down the list, guys.
And then just goes like, I'm a just
wasting my time. Because, yep. Every one of
them blindly support Israel. Here's Muhammad Shehada pointing
out what even an Israeli
from the government,
ex defense minister is now openly saying about
Israel, while the 9 like, 99%
of your government
is blindly and even saying unequivocal support. Unconditional,
you keep hearing.
Well, here's what the ex defense minister says.
The IDF is no longer a moral army.
Same
Yalen brag this the same person in 2017
brag, quote, there are hardly any senior government
officials and Knesset members who have had to
kill more Palestinians than me.
That's this guy.
He says, Shahada says, so you can imagine
how far worse things have become if this
guy is saying they're no longer moral.
Moshe Yalan adds that many Israeli terrorist settlers,
aka hilltop youth, the ones we were just
talking about,
who kill Palestinians for sport,
have been now recruited to the IDF to
continue to kill Palestinians, but in uniform instead.
Here's my point.
Not only have they given official capacity to
these settlers themselves,
given guns and support, but with IDF support,
but now they're just overlapping with the IDF
entirely.
This is the ex defense minister. He said,
Yolan, a right wing politician himself, warns that
Israel's far right government wants to ethnically cleanse
and forcibly transfer Palestinians
and is pushing for a Gog or Magog
war. That's the end times.
That's prophecy stuff. He says he calls on
Israel's AG and Shin Bet chief to put
Netanyahu in prison.
This is what one of their hot leaders
are saying and your government is blindly going
along with it. How does that not demonstrate
control?
It's pretty cute. It's pretty scary to me.
Now, Tiberias put out a point to end
on.
Here, the White House basically says a Reuters
says, the White House says there are monitoring
Israel's wars and Gaza, Lebanon, saying that a
war with Egypt would be their red line.
I mean, how dumb do you think we
are? So now, I mean, so the red
line apparently was Rafa. Oh, but but then
it's Lebanon. Then what they said, oh, we're
now it's Egypt though because we're in Lebanon.
So the point is the red line's meaningless
nonsense that you put out to make it
look like you have a red line.
Everyone knows that if they have a brain
or even care to look.
Now Tiberias makes the point on that. He
says, prediction, obviously. It's 2027.
Israel has nuked 14 countries, killed 300,000,000.
The western world is collapsing into civil wars,
yet dictator Netanyahu says Israel must now invade
France because of October 7th.
The Harris administration
says this will be a red line for
the 37th time this year.
Now, obviously, I would argue it would be
the same difference no matter who we're talking
about. I guarantee Trump would use different narratives.
But the point he's making is obvious.
It's never going to stop. And I would
argue no matter who, what puppet is currently
in power, unless we as the people do
something about this.
But to end on a positive,
I want us to think about like, so
what we're talking about here is that this
is where we're going,
but we can stop this.
I know we can stop this. I know
we're doing that. It just takes us to
recognize the power that's currently in our hands.
They're scared of you, and that's why this
is happening. If we can simply recognize that
the screening partisan morons and the partisanship who
are telling you to choose between 2 evil
people and
the people in the government outside of that
minority that everybody else can see this, we
need to do something about that. Stand up
and put your foot down
because they are afraid of that. That's why
this is all happening and why even the
the mere mention of the 2 party illusion
and what we're doing suddenly freaked out the
paradigm when we've been saying this for 10
years because they're vulnerable.
Take advantage of this moment to do something
about this because right now, we are watching.
Like, if you wanna talk about World War
2 or different genocides, we're literally living through
it in real time, one to the next.
And it's gonna continue. Like Katherine said, it's
gonna come to you
unless we stand up.
Do something about this. Care for people, the
marginalized peoples we're talking about earlier.
Because you are those people, guys. It's one
step away from you being the next target,
whether that's Israel's pager attacks coming to you
or your own government deciding to step on
your throat because you're suddenly a threat to
their cop their agendas, which is happening in
the US right now.
Now the positive note is that we can
make that difference. Now it's hard because it's
a it's it's it's hard up to focus
on the negative and all that.
That it is scary. It is what they're
doing is horrifying, and it is a bad
thing. But my point is, as always, that
it's balanced. It's it's happening simultaneously with the
rise of your consciousness to see a change
happen. And, I mean, what is that if
not hopeful and positive? What are we fighting
for if not the awareness of the majority
to do something to change the reality? That's
where we are right now. I don't think
we can see it, though. And all I'm
trying to get people to do is recognize
that. You wanna vote, go vote. You wanna
engage, do that. But we need to take
advantage of this moment
to actually shift things that I think have
nothing to do with that illusion of some
process. That we can shift the power structures
by simply applying the leverage that we have
if we recognize that.
Take action. Say things. Stand up. Speak to
people. Have your own meetings. Send flyers. Talk
to your politicians. The point is take action.
Do something. Be better today than you were
yesterday, and we will see this course in
front of us. I know it.
So I'm gonna end with the clip that
I played the other day from Lev from
from Libya,
since we were highlighting the Africa conversation today,
because this is blowing up to the this
is expanding,
for a better word, around the world. I
mean, it's already there, guys. You understand US
foreign policy through Israel is everywhere. But what
we're seeing now is the reiteration of this
because of their failing influence, because they're stretched
too thin. There's that opportunity.
Hear the words into what he's saying. Recognize
that this is now again, even if you
think he's just being an opportunist
and using this to con con convince you
that he's on the good guy side, well,
I don't don't be objective all the time.
Don't apply good guy, bad guy narratives. Just
follow the facts. Stick to your trust your
morals, your integrity. Follow your heart.
And if he's saying the thing you yes.
Good. What the what he said. Don't fall
in line and say, now he's who we
have to listen to or that Musk or
Tucker or whatever else or the new partisan
narrative.
Listen to them if you wanna engage with
the content, but recognize that it's about you
and your choices day by day and taking
these steps forward. And we will see the
path develop in front of us. It's happening
right now.
So these words on the end. Listen to
what he's saying regardless of what you think
he is,
and think about the possibility of a world
like that. Of what it would really look
like to apply that.
Not from some government
barrel of a gun telling you you have
to act this way, but simply because the
majority recognizes we want that. And then we
take actions to make sure that maintains and
that we bolster that ourselves, which history shows
will eventually taper back down. But this is
the point of being vigilant.
It'll always be there. There will always be
people like this that wanna take advantage and
co opt. That's why we need to be
an informed electorate to make sure we understand
things, not for elections, but because we see
things and we discuss them and we have
an open mind if we don't fall asleep
and pretend that they're gonna take care of
it for us.
Take responsibility
for you, for your family, for everyone around
you, for your choices because we can do
this. I know this. I love you all.
As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Who will aim at you and say,
welcome to the world of double standards.
And talking about double standards,
just a while ago,
we heard the representative
of the occupying Israeli forces
bashing you all
as he does with and his predecessors,
perform a show,
and teaching us and lecturing us about humanity
and morality.
Totally disconnected
from reality.
Even today,
he couldn't bring any
justification
nor speak about the topic we're discussing,
the illegal settlements.
He could not address
the resolution
and trying to show that the world started
only
on October
7th,
neglecting the fact of history.
Well,
if he considers this assembly a circus, guess
what?
I consider him a clown performing
in this place,
always bringing his preps,
trying to produce a show,
failing to make us laugh,
deceiving us from reality.
That's what they try to do, but they
failed dramatically.
So when I asked him if he thinks
this place is a circus,
why are you performing in it? Why are
you still a member in it?
Ladies and gentlemen, it's time for you to
show action and not words.
Nearly a year will pass and the massacres
and genocide in Gaza
and the West Bank is continuing.
The inability
of the international community, especially the security council
to stop these atrocities
and reach a ceasefire,
and the silence of many of you
is what allowed the killing of tens of
1,000,
injuring 100 of 1,000,
the displacement of almost 2,000,000,
the spread of famine,
and diseases.
So today, do some justice for those innocent
and vote in favor of this resolution,
which would be a message from the world
to the occupying forces
and who support them blindly,
say enough is enough,
and it's time to act.
Libya reaffirms its position that it won't define
resistance
against occupation
as terrorism.
And who from your countries didn't gain their
independence
without
resistance,
especially when the doors of peaceful solutions are
completely shut down.
Libya affirms its position that the only peaceful
solution to this 7 decades of aggression and
occupation
is by recognizing the Palestinians' right to defend
themselves
and resist occupation
and the right of self determination
and having an independent state with Jerusalem,
its capital.
In conclusion,
it's time now for all to comply and
respect the outcome of the ICJ.
This court, which we all know
has established or was established to help in
ensuring peace and justice
where international law should prevail
over the use of force.
Therefore, we call on you all to vote
in favor of this resolution to pave the
road for peace.
History will remember
those countries
who which had taken a principle,
a moral,
a legal, or humane stance,
and it will also remember those who had
their humanity in deep coma
and were aware and deliberately participated
in this live broadcasted atrocity,
especially
the 21st century holocaust,
the holocaust of Gaza.
Voting in favor of this resolution today
is a vote for peace, and it's a
vote for justice.
I thank you.