The Zionists have used it and brought it,
in fact, to the area. Terrorism as we
know it today, the planting of bombs in
marketplaces and so on and so forth, was
in fact introduced into the Middle East by
the Zionists in the twenties.
But the net result of of Zionist,
terrorism and and violence in the in the
1st 3rd of 20th century has brought forth,
to my mind, the the anomaly,
the
horrific and
unacceptable status in the Middle East
today of the state of Israel, which is
in fact an armed garrison state, which now
exports more arms and distributes violence all around
the world,
vastly disproportionate to its size. I mean, in
that respect, I think it's a it's it's
a horrible cycle of of violence. But in
it all, I think the Palestinian is the
victim. There's no question about that.
Welcome to the daily wrap up. A concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Friday, September 20, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today. A very
important follow-up story today. Really, I mean, it
is generally a follow-up for a lot of
reasons, but the story of specifically the pager
attack in Lebanon
and and how this has been a continuing
developing
issue. And that clip starting I've I've made
that point many times right there. And it's
important to understand that this is a this
is an academic reality, to understand
what, you know, the idea of what we
have of suicide vests and all these conversations.
Zionism is the impetus for these conversations. And
it's an important time to reiterate that point
while what just because of what just happened
in the
many different civilian locations where this happened. Now
we're gonna go over that point to start
today, the the importance of understanding that. And,
again, forgive, you know, those that are used
to the more day to day coverage. We
will get back that. I promise that you're
used to I'm I'm gonna covering some things
that are gonna be over the last so
many days and, you know, from the beginning
of that event up until now to highlight
or maybe just make sure you understand what
happened there. Make sure you have all the
facts to discuss this this conversation,
you know, who was involved, whether the US
government knew,
what the how Israel went about doing this,
what companies they used, how long ago it
was planned so you know the full picture.
Because there's a lot of, as always, misinformation
flying around. But then the point of today's
show
is to highlight how important that is with
the reality, the very unnerving reality with what
we just saw
of how the u how the US government
or really just the United States' tech industry,
which I I recommend you look at Whitney's
conversations and her work around the kind of
the fascistic kind of meshing of Silicon Valley
and our government in a lot of different
ways.
But the infiltration of Israeli unit 82100
intelligence connected start up companies
throughout our tech field
in very alarming ways. It it draws to
mind the conversation of
the China discussion
of our Apple phones and all these different
which are very much was it a concern
and should be. Any foreign entity
any foreign entity that is infiltrating your tech
and has backdoors to your information anything like
that obviously should matter. That was the premise
for the whole point at that time.
Why now is this not a concern with
what they just demonstrated?
Well, the obvious answers you'll get because they
would never do that because we're a strategic
partnership and all these different despite the fact
that Israel has very much done that to
the US and to Americans repeatedly
since its inception, all the way to this
very day when they or this very moment,
in fact, where they just killed an American
activist in Israel and your government simply didn't
care. And we'll touch on that a little
bit today.
So
let's talk about this from the beginning. Now,
actually, I wanted to start with one point
that I wanna make sure you didn't miss
in regard to our, the update on our
recent panel we had from the IMA, which
will open with a point about the independent
mainstream alternative media and why that's an important
conversation for this. But, really, just so you
see that that the the developing part of
that
initiative, that alliance that we're building, but also
that you see, you know, the the the
I it's important to recognize the the angles
of how the the
mainstream alternative media, as David Ick pointed,
controls, manipulates, drives a lot of these conversations.
And right now, it's obvious what side of
the false two party paradigm or just your
government
is driving or hiding most of the stuff.
So the the the narratives around Israel to
make sure we see it in a very
specific light. But as always, it's it's a
teeter totter. It goes back and forth depending
on what's going on. It is simply the
Uniparty playing different roles as we've talked about
a lot, but we're not gonna get into
that so much today. But let's start with
this just in case you missed it. We
had a really great panel
announcing the Independent Media Alliance. So I'll, excuse
me. This is actually our our press release,
and I'll show you the panel next.
We put this out both on conscious resistance.
Pretty much a lot of us put it
out in different platforms, just the media alliance
announcement. And, really, it was just a highlight
for you what this was about and and
just so you understand what we're trying to
accomplish. And all we said was we're thrilled
to announce the creation of the Independent Media
Alliance, a collaborative effort focused on promoting objective
fact based media from a diverse team of
journalists, podcasters, and writers.
Our emphasis will be on countering narratives currently
being seeded within the, quote, alternative media space,
including but not limited to, the false two
party paradigm, hopium and politicians,
support for imperial wars, 5th generation warfare, and
technocratic solutions to legitimate problems. For example, digital
IDs pitched as the only solution for immigration,
voting fraud prevention, or whatever else they'd like
to fit in there. The IMA will take
several actions in the pursuit of this goal,
including regular panels and debates featuring alliance members
and guests,
collaborative and joint investigations, and launching a new
decentralized media network to host relevant content from
Alliance members. Now the Independent Media Alliance will
be partnering at with the decentralized video platform
Odysee to ensure that the content cannot easily
be censored.
Now, right, at the moment, that's still sort
of developing. So it's anything there may be
reasons that come up down as this process
develops that we may decide to change course.
But at the moment and I'm only saying
I'd just be objective because right now, it
seems like that's our direction. They're building something
that will be the very first decentralized media
network.
Now the list down here is the are
are are the people that have so far
that are officially part of the dynamic going
forward. There's a few out there like, for
instance, Kathryn Austin Fizz or True Street Media
that have, they've signaled that they wanna be
a part of this, but they're busy and
they don't wanna necessarily start at the moment
and so on. So the point is this
is gonna be evolving going forward.
To be clear about things to start, the
reality is as I mean, really, the 3
Derek, Whitney, and myself were very explicit about
this in our early conversations. And we've all
agree at this point that finance
financial aspects of this are not part of
the conversation. We're not seeking funding, we're not
asking for funding, we're not even like, even
in regard to the odyssey part of this,
we're we're getting our discussions are about not
allowing there to be any financial dynamic. Like,
if individuals within this, like myself and our
links down in the chat, wanna say, hey,
if you wanna donate to me personally, it's
right there. Of course. But the idea of
any other concept, which is important with all
that's going on, is not part of this.
It is simply an alliance of people with
with the the what we just described. The
idea that we see something very alarming happening
in the illusion of independent media, and it's
important that we wanna on the side of
nonpartisan,
objective, fact based integrity,
rooted integrity content.
So I I feel very positive about this,
and I think a lot of good things
are gonna come from this despite all the
kind of irrational
screaming of people that think this is bad
for unextribe
you know, the reasons are usually pretty broad
and subjective. The point is,
I'm not asking you to buy in anything
or buy anything.
Simply
judge it by the fruits
as we go forward. And the the recent
panel that we just put out, make sure
I'm not missing anything I was gonna say
there. Really, just that this is you know,
know, I'm excited about this and I do
think this is gonna be very positive. And
the ultimate point, I think, is we're gonna
sort of make one of whatever we decide
seems like that's gonna be Odysee being a
a hub for
in a decentralized network where we individuals within
this group could post their content, but we
also have the main place to be posting
this through. So at the moment, we put
this through TLab and that might be kind
of oscillating between channels before we get that
going, but that's ultimately the plan. So this
was our first discussion.
Debunking the false binary with the Independent Media
Alliance. And we'll have plenty more conversations even
just on this topic.
And again, I used an American centric image
because I thought it was important to make
that point, but ultimately I made the real
clear point here, this is much bigger than
the United States. It is the binary idea
that's used even outside of politics to force
us into a position where in many cases
we think we're making the choice, but we're
not being given the full picture. So make
sure you check this out. We had a
really good conversation.
Oh, I'm sorry about that. I'm sorry. I'm
just really irritated immediately by the idea that
it looks like Rumble is, for some reason,
not playing.
Well, I don't wanna waste time. I wanna
make sure we get into this. I'll fix
that later, I guess. I'm not sure. I'll
rum rumble. There we go.
That's pretty interesting, isn't it? Well, anyway, for
some reason, rumble was still playing the opening
of that video that was aired day the,
day before yesterday. I think the point is
I wanna show you really quickly who was
in it For the time
being, the or for the show, this these
were the people that joined. We're gonna have
a lot more people coming in and joining
and discussing. And one of the oh, that's
the last thing I was gonna say. I
knew there was something. One of the next
thing 2 things we're gonna do.
There's gonna be a panel just or really
just a a kind of an announcement from
Derek, Whitney, and I in a video form
and sort of have a a little panel
of our own, which we wanted to do
before this, but just timing didn't work out.
Or we're gonna sort of announce it publicly
and just in a video form as well.
And then I think one of the next
things we wanna try and do is, we're
discussing who, but we wanna try to find
somebody that is a very small channel out
there that has been doing amazing work through
COVID 19 8 1984, through the the Israel
Gaza discussion, through
know, any coverage of the 2 party illusion,
which was our 3 kind of main things
we're highlighting,
and and and rise them up. And say,
look at this person doing amazing work. And
the reason they're not getting attention is because
they're nonpartisan, because they're objective, because they don't
meet these boxes that the partisans sides want
to endorse. So look forward to that. Again,
please judge it by its fruits because it
you know, that that's what all we're asking.
There there's so many things that are being
the conclusions being jumped to.
I'm just excited about the fact that we're
working with so many great people with great
independent thoughts, and we don't agree on everything.
And I think this is what independent media
should really be about.
Now
on top of that, I wanted to highlight
what World Alternative Media pointed about this. And
this is the same thread that keeps going
around. It's It's really interesting. So Terrible pulled
this out, like, months ago.
And it says, in a time of deceit,
telling the truth, it's a revolutionary act. Unfortunately,
many big accounts on Twitter are compromised, chasing
money, but real journalism is still alive. You'd
think she's pointing at us. No. No. She's
pointing at all the people that are big
accounts that are compromised that are chasing money
on Twitter. I'm not I'm kinda joking but
most of them. There's a few in here
that I have think do some good work
here and there but the bottom line is
if you look through this list, you're gonna
find people that are a prolific intentional liars
in my opinion. Who are actively promoting things
that they know aren't to be true or
are lying for your true the bottom line,
maybe they don't even know that, but look
for yourself. It's the people that I've highlighted
over the years, many of them that are
constantly like Chuck Astellas in there. I pointed
it out during the during the beginning of
this the October 7th discussion. One of the
most important lies he put out right in
the beginning was the lie about all the
children, their burned bodies in that dumpster which
he deleted right after, which still got used
for a long time. Robert called it out
right in the beginning and said, nope. Those
are those are,
members of a mosque that they killed.
Right? And they blame they pretend that they
were all the bottom line is they put
out things whether they're a lot of the
independent mainstream alternative media is putting out information
that they're not vetting, that they jumped to
conclusions about, or just blatantly lying to you.
Maybe they're not doing it on purpose. The
point is that's irrelevant to the idea of
actually showing, you know, what we're trying to
build. Due diligence, taking time, acting with integrity,
making sure that this stuff is inaccurate whether
or not it's partisan related or whether or
not it helps the person that you want
to highlight. And as he wrote,
all the people who hijack the truth community
with solutions like vote and trust us. Yeah.
Great. And he says, David Ick, in case
you wanna have a laugh, check this out.
This is what you've been talk saying in
a nutshell. Which is the mainstream alternative media.
Now Whitney pointed this out, And I think
this is an extension of this point, which
is really interesting. Now, she's been highlighting the
idea that she has been de personed on
Facebook. Where you have and I mean, I'm
dealing with I think a lot of us
are dealing with much smaller
examples. But this is a pretty prominent example.
It's really interesting. Like, on on Telegram, for
example, there's every other day, I see a
new person pretending to be TLAP, saying, hey.
Join this crypto thing, which will never I
will never do that. Whether I support it
or not, I'm not selling you anything. I'm
not posting links to anything ever. Even if
I have shirts to sell, I simply point
it out in the show. You never see
me do that, so don't fall for that.
Or on Rumble, for example, there's a fake
TLav account that makes comments pretending to be
me. I see it all the time. It
has TLav, you know, at the end and
a one at the end. A lot of
times you can't see that.
This is Whitney's account or account on Facebook
pretending to be Whitney, not this here, but
this is her pointing it out. What's interesting
about this story we're gonna highlight is what
Whitney says here is this fake Facebook account
impersonating her
that Facebook, in fact, refuses to remove, which
she's been
highlighting this for a long time,
is being tagged and promoted as she's claiming
here by Simone Gold, and it does appear
that way. What's interesting is it turns out
that what people are highlighting is that's also
a fake account. Turns out it's a fake
a Facebook account pretending to be her with
52 followers on Facebook. Someone Gold has a
really large following.
So what's interesting to me is what we're
beginning to see is the outline it's more
this is what we're seeing. We're trying to
show people there's a very undermine like a
very surreptitious
thing going on on Facebook and Twitter and
all these different platforms that always has been
going on. But in this case, now you've
got a fake Whitney Web account making fake
content, and then a fake Simone Gold account
sharing that content and going, Look, we're working
together to make this big thing.
And no one on these platforms care.
And she's simply going, look, this is crazy.
Now, at the moment, I think and they've
tagged it on here, so I think she's
seen this. But she's highlighting this, I'm not
part of this. She's, I have nothing to
do with this project or gold, and I
continue to reject the fake accounts, efforts to
impersonate or reperson me as a means to
discredit my reputation and my work. This is
happening everywhere.
And now especially with this new project, which
people seem to be very de desperately concerned
about, I guarantee more of this will happen.
People trying to make up narratives to make
us look like we're doing something we're not.
I mean, this is the world of defakes.
This is where it's going. And the announcement
says our film, What is a Doctor? Will
be released October 6th. We're going to blow
the lid off the gender affirming care and
expose the health care industry. And it simply
says, You don't wanna miss this with Whitney
Webb.
And so what the what are they trying
to accomplish here? Is it all just about
decrediting discrediting her? Or is it about trying
to use them to push their own narratives?
It's pretty unnerving, isn't it? Now, Decenters News
has been highlighting her being deep repersoned, depersoned.
Now, Sheryl's the one that pretty much highlighted
this, high tagging her the her real account
here on of which is almost a 1000000
followers.
But simply highlighting that this is not really
her.
And I it's very interesting. I just wanted
you guys to see that. You know? But
who knows what the objective is, but clearly
there's a lot of this going on. And
a lot of this overlaps with this kind
of just fake building
It's not even alternative media. It's mainstream mainstream
media. That's I mean, most of these people
are huge
elitist with lots of backing for money and
you can't see, and half of them are
people that just stepped one half step away
from corporate media. And we're like, we're independent.
Just don't buy
it. Oh, and this is the same tweet
right there. Now here, David Icke chimed in,
not about this explicitly, but on 16th, and
simply said, I keep saying this about what
Woody said here.
Saying this to so much abuse because I
keep saying this, essentially, you get so much
abuse because it's true and in your face
if you would only open your eyes and
see. Thank goodness others like Whitney can see
it. You are being misled by those who
say they are on your side. Wake up
before the alternative, in quotes, hijack leads over
leads you over the same cliff the workers
are heading for. Now the reason this is
important is an opening note that I want
you guys to see, but also consider this:
as we're literally watching
the most important ally of our government
openly carrying out terrorist attacks that are indiscriminately
hurting people. Now, whether or not we'll get
into it, the pagers were explicitly Hezbollah information
does
not make that even remotely provable, but the
point being that they were clear there was
I'll just say it now. 5 months out
is when they started this.
There's no way they could know where these
pagers went and who was holding them or
whether they were in somebody's bag that was
taken by other people. Or in a plane
or in a car, which most of these
things happened.
So the point is, they're
the partisanship,
largely, will ignore these things. But my concern
is the fact that this government that is
doing these things has explicitly,
like, incredibly, obviously infiltrated the tech field in
this country. And most of these people on
the right right now
will ignore that because the same people,
the Elons and Thiels and Trump, they're all
supporting that same direction, including Israel. So it's
important to see how we're being misled. And
now as I've always pointed out, it goes
back and forth. Just like during COVID 19,
the left was blind to this conversation, and
I think the right more so saw it.
But I think that's why Trump was using
that situation to pacify them. But it's never
about, they're the ones that see it, they're
the ones that don't. It always changes.
They're playing you against yourselves, that's the 2
party illusion or multiple parties in some countries,
but it's still the same game. So the
false whatever you would call that, false binary
and the same concept, you know. So here's
what Whitney had to say about this. Speaking
with Richard Willett, by the way, who I've
interviewed with many times.
A lot of the bullying tactics that used
to be mainstream media directed at alternative media
are now being weaponized within alternative media now
that it's coming to sort of supplant
MSM, and we have the mainstream alternative medias
as David Icke has called it. I think
it's a very good name for it.
We have that growing and and developing it
itself and linking itself very much to Trump
world and,
you know, political parties elsewhere as well.
And I think, you know, a lot of
people sort of,
yeah, are being sucked to sort of a
hope and change operation,
for right leaning,
freedom loving, constitution
loving, and also gun owning Americans because the
gun ownership is a problem for people,
the powers that be in the United States.
How do we disarm the public? Well, the
easiest way to disarm the public is not
to come take their guns. It's to it's
to psychologically neuter them. And how do you
do that? You make them think that,
their guy who loves and protects them is
gonna,
you know, solve every problem once he's in
office, and you can just sit back in
your armchair and relax and trust the plan,
you know?
Getting the gun owners to just sit back
and be compliant. They'll be more compliant when
they think their guy's running the show.
Right? And their guy that's running the show,
or that they hope will run the show,
Trump, when he was in office last time,
he called on social media companies to profile
users to,
enact a pre crime paradigm where people that
might commit shootings before they happen should be
targeted by social media and reported to law
enforcement.
And then
his administration was considering a a program,
to basically use AI to go over social
media profiles and social media posts of regular
Americans
and look for what they called early warning
signs of neuropsychiatric
violence. And then have those people, like, go
by court order to a court ordered physician
and be, like, medicated,
put under house arrest, or indefinitely
detained.
So,
people this is why I say policy records
really matter because, I mean, people talk about
Trump and the vaccine and, like, yes, that's
absolutely true, but there's a lot of other
stuff that happened during his his administration
that is bad for the constitution,
bad for freedom and liberty.
Right. And this is our like, this is
the whole point that I mean, policy
history is all that matters in my opinion
and pray because everything else is narrative. Now
even if they mean it, the point is
who knows what may come along next where
they just changes their dynamic, changes their opinion,
or they can't do it. The bottom line
is what you can see of what they've
already done, what they've followed through with,
that's what matters.
And so all what we can see is
a is a an example of that already
being the case, where promises were not followed
through with. Now whether you think there's a
reason behind it or not, the bottom line
is what we're seeing
now
are, you know, the same kind of dynamic
where you're saying a lot of things you
think they wanna hear and many people just
wanna accept that as hopeful. And I get
it. I wanna be hopeful too. But our
point ultimately is that whether it's the the
vaccine, which is more than enough, by the
way, the amazing reality of what you can
ignore of the guy who
I mean, how can you ignore the continual
support for that thing? It's unreal to me
that anyone can blind themselves to that. But
there's a lot of other examples she highlights.
And even just speaking with, Dan Cohen about
the idea of the Global Fragility Act which
is currently being used right now to try
to re occupy Haiti. This was passed under
Trump's administration. There's a it's just it's important
to stand back and see the bigger picture.
The left and the right are the same
thing. Kamala and Trump will drive you in
the same direction even though you don't wanna
admit that to yourself. I hope I'm wrong.
I really do. Now here's what somebody followed
up with saying, just one question to David
Icke. I mean, no offense, if you happen
to read this. How can we be sure
that you're not controlled opposition? I'd love to
hear your take on this. And I wholeheartedly
agree with David's point. This is like me
this is what I was just saying about
the IMA. Judge it by its fruits. Question
everything.
He says, that's exactly the question you should
be asking about
everyone.
If they stand up to scrutiny, great. If
they don't, you'll see who you can trust.
And, obviously, there's a point in there where
maybe you maybe somebody just fails in some
way that makes you think they're the point
is that it's a it's erring on the
side of accuracy, erring on the side of
integrity and principles.
If somebody falls short, then you make sure
you note that. You don't give them excuse
and go, well, there must be something that
makes that make sense, which is the only
thing I seem to hear during Trump's administration.
He'd bring up this crazy thing or be
using the the, you know, the story that
came out about him about the the military
using the largest non nuclear bomb in Afghanistan
without even asking Trump and I showed people,
oh, there that can't be true. Oh, yeah.
It was. But you people just didn't wanna
hear it because it was something that didn't
make sense to their paradigm. The point is,
if you apply the same level of criticism
and truly question all of them, this wouldn't
be that difficult. But most people don't want
to do that. That's team sport politics.
He says, if they don't, you'll see who
you can trust. He says, I've been doing
this for 35 years. Long before anyone, but
a tiny few was revealing any of this.
And he's right.
He says, is that is that more likely
to be controlled opposition
or those who have moved in since the
pioneers revealed the themes of control, which are
now being revealed as bombshell news and breaking
news? That's the revelation of the method kind
of thing. Like, well past the point. They
want you to see it now as they
drive you into the next part. He has
been calling this out for a long time.
He says, ask yourself who is bringing anything
new to the table. If they aren't, just
repeating what others have revealed long ago,
big red
flag. This is why I I really appreciate
David Icahn. I support his long term work
despite what people may think about some of
the claims he puts out. He really has
been calling this out in a larger way
for such a long, more than almost anybody.
Now, on the voting side of this, I'm
gonna include these just to kinda quickly go
through. But I thought it's important to think
about stuff like this. Because the point is
we're leading into this. And we will talk
about this increasingly as we get closer to
the day of the selection.
But Thomas Massie recently put this out and
said, our country was founded upon, quote, the
consent of the governed to be governed.
At what point will citizens rescind
that consent?
Productive moral people will not forever consent to
serve a klept ocracy regardless of whether it
has the trappings of a democracy or a
republic.
Now and and I think what what does
kleptocracy again? It's the,
rule by the the people who use their
power to steal a country's resources. There's also
I mean, there's oligarchy and there's corporatocracy.
It's all generally kinda the same dynamic in
my opinion. The bottom line
is that let's just say you decided you
wanted to rescind your consent. What does that
look like today? Can you stand up and
be like, you no longer govern? No. That's
we don't live in a democracy. We don't
even live in a republic. We don't live
in anything we per we're told that we
do today. Now whether that's always been the
case or not isn't a good question, but
right now, it's not the point. It's the
point is that we need to recognize that.
If every American stood up right now and
said, we don't recognize your your ability to
govern us. You think they would care? You
think they would slowly stand down and give
us their rep no, guys. That's important to
recognize. The idea of the constitution saying that
we have the right to alter or abolish
should we recognize they no longer meet the
needs of what we're expect
they don't care about these things despite it
being in the constitution. That's clear by other
things they're trying to alter. But this is
a member of congress highlighting to us that
we should be doing that.
Now whether that hit is in and of
itself a ploy. I'm skeptical of all politicians,
but I do appreciate the point. I said
exactly what many of us are trying to
draw attention to regarding the upcoming selection.
Lesser of evils is the manipulation.
All we are doing is consenting to 4
more years of the same. I know you
all sense this. Time to stop going through
the motions and stand on principle. Now before
all those screeching partisans out there scream about,
well, why would you do? We've already gone
over this 4,000 times. And and this isn't
the point today. But just because you have
not done your due diligence or even cared
to look at the shows that are literally
titled about what you would do instead, doesn't
mean you should demand the you know, the
point is, there are other paths to take.
The idea of falling back into the, well,
what else am I gonna do? That is
giving up. But I want you guys to
think about the idea that there are other
paths and maybe one of those is simply
standing up and trying to acknowledge that they
no longer
deserve your consent. Which other side whichever side
you think you're looking at.
Now, I think in interest of time I'll
just include these because I wanna get I
wanna get right to the point. We've already
been on for 25 minutes. But Caitlin Johnstone
made a great point here about the election
in general. You know what? I'll read this
one and skip the next one. The wealthy
included, she made a point about why she
talks about this stuff. But she simply said
the election November will be rigged. This election
rigging will not be done by Russia or
by China or by Iran or by far
right coup plotters or by some shadowy cabal
tampering with voting machines. It will be well,
probably somewhat of all of those things might
be happening too, but it says it will
happen right out in the open.
It will be perfectly legal. That's the important
part to think about. That's the idea of
rescinding your consent because of things like this.
They're doing what they're supposed to be doing
in their minds.
It says, in fact, it's already happening. The
elect this election is being rigged by the
donor class, it's being rigged by lobby groups,
it's being rigged by the plutocrat owned mass
media,
and by plutocrat controlled Silicon Valley algorithm manipulation.
Now there's the overlap we'll talk about. It's
being rigged by obscenely wealthy people who can
afford to extract political favors in exchange for
massive campaign donations in ways no rep members
of the public could never. It's being rigged
by people who've brought up who've bought up
so much narrative control in the form of
media ownership that they can set agendas for
the entire country in ways that average voters
have no chance of ever doing.
These election meddlers dictate the political framework and
information environment in which elections take place. We're
seeing that right now. They decide what positions
will be considered normal and acceptable and which
will be considered radical and extreme.
That's why both of them are blindly going,
I support Israel. No, I support Israel.
It says
they predetermine the location and range of the
political spectrum at which the election will be
contested, and they restrict the Overton window of
acceptable political opinion within which debates
and discourse will occur.
They do this without any regard for the
interest of ordinary members of the public, but
solely for their own interests. That's why you
see candidates arguing about whether wars should be
whether
whether wars should happen, but not which wars
should happen.
And or rather let me just make sure
I say that right. That's why you see
candidates arguing not about whether wars should happen,
but which wars should happen, and how they
should occur.
Always war is the point. It's why you
see them accusing one another of being too
weak or dovish on foreign policy instead of
attacking each other as reckless warmongers.
It's why you see them arguing over who
loves Israel the most and who will send
it the most weapons rather than who will
do the most to end Israel's genocidal atrocities.
And this is the reason you don't get
to see the actual breadth of the full
picture of what people might be running for
president whether they're popular or not because they
will say those things. Even if it's simply
an interest of being the opposite of them,
which is my point about making that possible,
you will find more opportunists that will step
in and give you what you wanna hear.
But we can use them as vehicles for
change as long as we maintain the understanding
that all politicians lie.
The point here is that whether you're talking
3rd party or even people that are not
even acknowledged, there are people who have the
opinions exactly like this. They don't want them
being expressed because it forces the Kamala Trump
duopoly,
uni party, to address those things.
And it'd be and it's impossible to see.
It's it's possible to ignore how weak they
are on those positions when challenged with one
that's real. It's why, she says, you see
them debating who supports most fracking and oil
drilling instead of promising to end e ecocidal
policies and stop the corporate destruction of our
environment. It's why you see them arguing
over the minute details of what capitalism and
imperialism should look like rather than if capitalism,
imperialism should exist at all. It's why also
why when you see a candidate show up
with a platform of ending war and militarism,
stopping ecocide, and curbing the injustices
and abuse of capitalism, they are treated as
outlandish extremists.
Not just by the rich and powerful, but
by ordinary members of the public who've been
indoctrinated by by all of this manipulation
into accepting status
quo politics as the norm.
This rigged, controlled political environment is what we
were all born into. It's we so we're
conditioned to think it's normal.
It's very easy to miss how freakish and
abominable
the whole thing is. How destructive it is.
How much needless death and misery and destruction
it causes. This is rampant lawlessness we talk
about. It becomes normal.
She goes on, if we came from a
healthy world into this one, we would scream
in horror. But because we've never lived in
a healthy world, we can be manipulated into
mistaking the sickness of the civilization for health.
Elections are rigged in this way by a
fairly small group of plutocrats and empire managers.
Not just in the United States, but throughout
the western world. Really, the world in my
opinion. They rig our entire political system in
their favor and then have the gall to
tell us we need to freak out because
some Russians made some Facebook memes near election
season.
This is not democracy.
This is plutocracy.
This is oligarchy.
We're just indoctrinated into calling it democracy. And
I'm I'm arguing we don't even want democracy,
which is simply mob rule, by the very
same mass scale psychological manipulations they use to
keep it from being a democracy.
Now remember, this country is founded on being
a a a constitutional republic.
But it says all US elections these days
come with allegations of election interference, especially from
the losing side. But it's important to keep
in mind that even in the unlikely event
that those allegations were a 100% true,
they'd still be a tiny drop in the
ocean compared to the election interference that's already
happening right out in the open.
We just pretend it's normal.
Now here is another example of Donald Trump
expressing very recently that Israel
used to be able to control who's in
politics.
Not a surprise because we've already talked about
this. He said this many times. I just
want people to recognize before we get into
more explicit examples of the terrorism they're conducting,
including against Americans, including in ways that could
affect you right now, Here he is telling
you that they used to be able to
decide who was in politics. And if you
said a bad thing about Israel, well, you
wouldn't be in politics.
Entire world. And you have to take it
that it is a wake up call. Get
smart.
Instead, even here in America, Jewish citizens have
been forced to endure the worst outbreak
of antisemitism
in many generations.
100% false. Every single time they show these
statistics, it's always shown that the ADL and
the rest are simply using every single allegation
or
or claim or example of Palestinian protests, or
from the river to the sea, except not
when Israel says it, or any number of
examples. And then we saw during the campus
protest fervor that they kept using examples that
then later were proven not even to be
true. So the bottom line is this is
a wild Zionist manipulation in order to justify
its existence, and most Jews, in my opinion,
that I talk to are beginning to see
through it. But Donald Trump is being funded
by this Zionist organization and everybody else, Israel
included, probably more than that. You can imagine
what I mean. The bottom line is,
this is ridiculous for him to say based
on things that are already been shown to
be at least hyperbolic, have you exaggerated?
But it's what he says next which is
most concerning.
And so many people shockingly even deny the
attack took place. This is a new thing.
I saw
it recently with their interview The attack? Like,
you're just kinda lumping it all into one
thing?
Right? That you're just denying them? Because that's
how this works.
If you deny a claim of a Zionist,
you must be racist. Even though we're talking
about Zionism and not Judaism, which they love
to conflate. Oh, right now, based on this
new building antisemitism act, that would be considered
a crime. Even though it's actually true and
it's actually free speech. But listen to this
guy tell you why free speech is so
important. No. Exactly the opposite. Doing people, they
said, well, we don't know if there was
an attack. I don't know. It's just so
terrible.
And, you know, there were people
I read many times during
the Holocaust. We had people denying it. They
were deniers.
They said,
we don't
believe it ever took place,
and it's a terrible thing when they say
that. I mean, you know how you can
tell that he's just repeating what somebody told
him? Or rather, that he it was put
to him to say this in this conversation?
What do you mean during the holocaust they
were denied what he's trying to say is
that people denied the holocaust.
I mean, I I have no doubt there
was somebody during the time frame that was
going, I don't even know. Are we actually
pretending there was some kind of, like, mass
movement during the time frame going, that's not
really happening? My point is that what he's
actually talking about, whether that exists in some
frac some part of the conversation or not
at the time, is that people denied that
it happened or denied what the the claims
were despite the fact that Israel has been
caught through its entire existence bolstering and lying
about damn near everything. The reality around this,
I recommend you listen to Norman Finkelstein,
who explicitly highlights the reality of the holocaust,
but also argues that but saying that you're
not allowed to deny this idea, even if
they're wrong, is obviously a violation of your
free speech. And the whole point is it
creates what they're trying to build. But that's
why I point to him. Because people try
to misrepresent him as denying it when in
reality, he's not. His very clear statements are
the opposite of that. This is why they
end up getting caught lying for damn near
everything because it's so obvious that what they're
trying to do is manipulate you rooted on
things that are completely fabricated. And I'm talking
about just the point I made in regard
to October 7th and pretty much entire history.
Again, to be clear, Finkelstein would tell you
as a Jew himself in the history that
this was something that did take place. The
numbers, you can dispute because you have free
speech if you choose to look into it.
But the bottom line is that what we're
talking about here is the idea that people
denied these things. Now he's overlapping that big
story with the reality of things that were
completely lied about.
Why? Because that's how you do this. Somebody
says a bad thing about Israel, racist, holocaust,
that's how this goes and people are starting
to call it out. It's not insulting to
point it out when you can prove they're
continuing to, to well, really, insulting to point
it out in general because that's your opinion,
you have a right to free speech. People
can be insulted if they want. But it
is also true. And they do this and
it's constant in regard to and again, to
be clear, despite the fact that it's said
every 30 seconds, we're talking about Zionism manipulating
the world, including Jews, into believing these lies.
And I'm only here talking about the idea
of
claims of antisemitism post October 7th.
It's flimsy on on his face. I think
it was like 400% increase, they claim. That's
what they're pointing to. That was rooted in
absolute fabrication.
Now to be clear on top of all
that, obviously there's racism, obviously there's antisemitism.
And we can also overlap that with the
idea of what semites really are and the
lie about all of that. But the bottom
line point is anyone trying to say it
doesn't exist is lying to you. Anyone saying
that it's 400% spike is also lying to
you.
That's the reality of being objective and nonpartisan.
Never thought I would see anything like what
is happening right now. I never thought you'd
ever see a thing like this
ever happen. You would it's beyond
it's beyond belief. Now, what do you think
he's talking about? Yeah. You you might be
shocked to find out that he's totally not
talking about the biggest genocide we've seen in
our lifetimes
that Israel is yet again involved in. You
know? No. Not Bosnia. No. Not Rwanda. This
one. Also, that Israel was involved in.
And he's talking about, I guess, the general
discussion of antisemitism
post October 7th, and that's what he's talking
about? That's his con I can't believe what
I'm seeing. But let's keep giving them weapons
to murder children and starve them to death.
Use
disease as a weapon of war,
but you're I can't believe what I'm seeing
around these false claims. Really?
I mean, how does that not shock
honest, objective people? Even if you believe in
Trump, even if you believe in Israel, you
have to acknowledge
I mean, it's just mind blowing that that
would be your thing that you're blown away
by when you're watching them commit genocide that
the entire world can see.
Right now. I never thought you'd ever see
a thing like this ever happen. You would
it's beyond
it's beyond belief. You know?
15 years ago, Israel was the strongest
lobby, if you wanna use the word lobby,
had the strongest representation
of people like this. He's pointing at Mary
Matlelson and Zionist support. Like, they're not lobbyists
sitting there, by the way. He's here's what's
important to what he just did. He'll he'll
say it. These are great people, Miriam. Miriam.
Okay. Just so you heard that. Okay. So
what he just did right there was simply
point to
Israeli Zionists who are supporting him. Adelson is
you know, really, remember Sheldon,
a very wealthy individual that's always been influencing
politics. This is Miriam, which is his wife
after he passed away, continuing the same thing.
Now, this is not AIPAC. These are direct
connections to Israel.
So all he just did right there, which
is what he seems to constantly do, maybe
there's a point they're doing it on purpose,
I don't know, but he just let the
cat out of the bag. No. We're not
talking about lobbyists. We're talking about Israel directly
influencing US policy. They're not even trying to
hide this anymore. I mean, APEC itself is
clumsy and obvious
because of what they've been doing over the
last couple of years. Like, they've gone even
MSNBC
broke this down.
It's very clear. The FAR Act is obviously
relevant here. But he just pointed out that
they just it's just all lobbying. You know,
Israel will influence our politics lobbying.
No. It's it's, you know, infiltration of our
politics. And, of course, that become racist. No.
It's obvious. And we're not talking about Jews.
We're not talking about Israelis. We're talking about
Zionist influence. And that overlaps with all those
things, but it also overlaps with Christianity. It
overlaps with a lot of different things. It
is a political ideology, and it's politically
influencing this political campaign.
But the strongest there was if you said
something about a Jewish person or something about
Israel that was bad,
you were out of politics.
How do you get away with saying something
like that? Like, I assume that's not the
right way to frame that. Like, think about
what he just said. And I I'll play
the other one of them, but I got
4 clips of him saying this over the
last couple of months. He's explicitly saying and
repeated it 4 times now that at their
u the golden age was when Israel got
to decide who was in politics. When they
could just like, if you said he the
other one, which I'll play now, he says,
well, you they used to have complete control
of congress, rightfully so.
How do we not acknowledge this? Where are
all the Republicans around, specifically conservatives,
that are not blinded by teams of our
politics, but believe in Trump, that are unhappy
with this? Why where is that crowd? It
must exist. Speak up and go, that's crazy.
I don't care whether it's Iran or China
or Russia or Israel, you're talking about a
foreign government
be
he's stating that we should be okay with
them controlling what congress does.
This is him just saying back then that
you wouldn't even be in politics if you
said bad things about Israel. You know, it
doesn't matter whether they commit terrorism, which they've
been doing for 75 years, or murdering Palestinians.
No. No. It's just we just you won't
be involved. Why do you think we're in
the position we're in?
Unless your name was Ted Cruz, he could
he could get through.
I'm not sure what he meant by that
unless you're Ted Cruz. I I'm you know,
maybe let me know in the chat what
you think he means by that. But, see,
here's the next clip. And this is the
one that was on a radio show not
long ago. And And here, I'll just show
you the next clip, just so you remember
this. And I'm not gonna play all 3
of them. Well, all 4, technically.
This was from a campaign rally
with Israeli flags behind him, even though it's
a Trump fans rally. That makes a lot
of sense. Right?
And Miriam Adelson, there to support him, because
she's giving him a $100,000,000
and explicitly stated by Israeli media so he'll
allow her to continue to annex the West
Bank.
Well, that's already beginning to happen now anyway,
but the point is it's illegal. He agreed
to allow that illegal thing to happen so
he got money for it. Like, that seems
like a crime to me. But either way,
the bottom line is that and just so
it's clear, Kamala is doing the same thing.
They're all on the same maybe not Miriam,
but they're all doing the same thing.
All these clips say the same, and here's
Miriam pretty much saying the same thing as
well. That congress or politics
are should be influenced by Israel, and that's
what we need to get back to. He
says this in many different ways or similar
ways in all four of these clips. Here's
the one you probably remember. You know, the
biggest change I've seen in congress is Israel
literally owned congress. You understand that 10 years
ago, 15 years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And I think you know exactly what
I what I'm saying.
They had such power. Israel had such power
and rightfully
And rightfully.
Or Israel had such power
and rightfully,
they had such power. Israel had such power
and rightfully
over congress. You know,
Israel was the most powerful
lobby
in the country 15 years ago. Today, between
Tlaib and AOC and all of these people,
what they're doing,
Israel,
they don't have the back end that they
once had. You'll give it to them. Yeah.
I have the I'm good.
And the point is they also said another
clip where they wouldn't be in politics today.
If if they had the power, they should.
So it's just in multiple styles, he's telling
you that Israel should, 1, be dictating who's
allowed in politics in the United States government,
and, 2, can ultimately decide or rather, 2,
is rightfully supposed to be there, is the
better better way to put it. Unreal. I
mean, I just can't and, again, in case
you're pretending we're only aiming at Trump, Kamala
is in the same position. What's important to
me is that this seems to be the
choice.
That's how I see it. But, I mean,
like I I joked on the radio shows
this morning, I'm pretty sure Democrats would vote
for a potted plant with a Democrat sticker
on it if
it it goes both ways, really. Because it's
really just about how that person's worse. So
you give me anything other than that and
we're gonna vote for it because, well, that's
worse. And they're both doing it. It's just
so sad, what we're watching right now.
Now, here's what Craig Molkheimer said, and then
we're gonna get into the Lebanon discussion, and
that'll be the rest of the conversation today.
He says Israel provided his military support to
South Africa during apartheid.
Undeniable.
I mean, and don't forget, one of the
things they were working on, and this is
public information, were specifically,
what's the I'm blanking on the word all
of a sudden. Bio weapons that are focused
on specific ethnicities. Ethnic focused bio weapons. It's
not a secret. It's very e you can
look and there's all sorts of document that's
not to say they succeeded. I I think
that there's some level of the research that's
still going on in the United States and
elsewhere,
and Israel. But the point is that that
was, in fact, what was going on.
Now and also, to
Rwanda, before, during, and after the genocide, which
I'll include this link for you to go
through and watch the show. It's it's public
knowledge, but people just don't like to talk
about it, or if they do, they call
it fake news. But it's very easy to
prove. Also in Serbia, during the genocide in
Bosnia as well. Roberts covered this. And to
Myanmar,
during the genocide against Rohingya. The these Israel
has been supporting every genocide that we actually
know of right now. These are not
this is not like any the claims of
antisemitism.
These are factual based things that you can
look up for yourself.
The point is that you say it and
Israel shouts down, controls politics, influences, lobbies, and
people don't talk about it.
It's amazing to me that you could say
that about Russia or China and people wouldn't
bat an eye. But you say it about
Israel and you're racist somehow. It's just it's
in sure there could be an overlap. But
it's incredible how well that's worked with how
flimsy their propaganda
clearly is.
It says today, it supports oppressive regimes and
is allied with ethnonationalist
forces around the globe. One of the most
obvious is the Azov movement.
They funded and influenced that group for a
long time. It was, in fact, created by
the CIA back going back decades, 19 40
something, I believe. And this is a very
obvious reality. The CIA documents prove it. They've
been building this fascist entity for a long
time to use, at the time, against the
Soviet Union. Now they're using it against Russia.
Israel funds it even though it's an opium
Neo Nazi group, and there's a real interesting
contradiction there that you need to understand. It's
Zionism lying to you. But it goes on
to say, it attacks its neighbors. Oh, far
the most important part, it is a key
source of weapons, intelligence, and tech
to oppressive regimes in every region.
So is the United States in a lot
of ways. It attacks its neighbors and assassinates
foreign officials. Its agents corrupt governments and harass
human rights defenders in the west.
Still think this is only a Palestinian problem?
And this is one of the main reasons
we're talking about this in the context of
of, you know this is not just a
like, right now in the US political s
discussion, despite our tax dollars predominantly being used
to carry out this genocide and the fact
that they're doing this in many ways in
the interest of American warfare or rather vice
versa,
The point being, Americans in a lot of
cases pretend that this is not something we
should be talking about for our election.
But we have to realize, as I've said
before, this is one of the most important
issues of our time right now. The realization
of what Zionism has done to the world
and still does to this moment if we
do not stop what's happening.
Very important to consider.
Now, that all being said, that's why this
is important to consider this conversation. So this
is coming to right now. The history, which
we'll go through a little bit part here
and there as we go through this discussion,
is obvious.
The idea of the terrorist background, the Zionist
and how it was created, or Zionism and
how it was created and what was used
to push this into reality, what we're seeing
right now, and still taking place, as as
they're currently bombing Lebanon is that they're currently
probably bombing multiple places as well. Which is
what's kind of always seems to happen, this
randomly bombing Syria, currently bombing Gaza, or starving
people as we talk.
This was an attack carried out on Lebanon
that is, to a t, a terrorist attack.
This is this is state sponsored terrorism. There
is literally no way around it. Just because
the US and Israel scream up the other
otherwise
does not change the fundamental reality. I mean,
you could make make it a simple point
to think about. Let's just
say the definition of terrorism was somebody shooting
a gun. It's not the case, but let's
just say for to make it easy to
understand. Israel then stands up and shoots a
gun.
And they go, No, because they did this
first. Or, No, because I was holding the
different kind of No, because I was holding
it at a different angle. It doesn't matter.
He still fired the gun. It's terrorism. And
that's how this has to be understood.
This meets the explicit definition. They have used
whether it's the booby trapping of devices that
are out in public areas, which is explicitly
against the law in international law, or the
idea that this is
on the back of their infiltration campaign in
regard to civilian locations, or Hezbollah itself, which
is not a terrorist organization, the way that
they carried this out in every possible way.
Or the idea that these people, there's no
way they could known if they were in
military capacity when this was executed,
which also matters. But because they go, well,
they're all bad guys, so nobody should care,
isn't that what the other people would say
when they bomb in your location? I mean,
the point is it it's
the only thing they use to make it
look like they're not bad is that they're
worse.
Sounding familiar?
They say they're terrorists. They broke the law
first. No. They started bombing our areas first
so that way we can bomb their civilians.
Which is pretty much what you're hearing online
right now.
So, as I've always pointed out, so then
you're just the same then.
At best, you're just the same. You're just
doing it back. So you're just as illegitimate.
It's more than that because the reality of
what's going on with Lebanon or Hezbollah in
regard to the illegal areas
is very different than what you're being told.
To sum that up before and we'll get
to that in a minute in regard to
the follow-up and what they're doing in Lebanon
after the fact after this,
remember the reality of what's been going on.
1st,
Lebanon is illegally occupied by Israel. That is
a fundamental fact in this that we cannot
be ignored. Just like with Gaza,
locations of Lebanon are currently occupied by Israel.
That's an international reality.
So just like with Gaza, they have a
legal right to arm resistance.
Okay? So then, of course, if they're bombing
civilian targets, well, no. That would be a
crime. Here's why Israel claims that every single
time they're bombing these locations, even though they're
not, because that's how they try to hide
the fact that what they're doing is, in
fact, aiming, one, at illegal occupation areas, illegal
settlements by everyone's perspective in the world and
and is now even getting more attention in
the UN uncomfortably
because it is a focus all of a
sudden. They are calling them settlers and it
is illegal occupation and everybody knows that. But
now Israel is in this bad position of
trying to argue that they're under attack while
trying to undermine the reality that you're technically
they're bombing illegal locations. You can't see, there's
a whole problem there for them. But the
point is, because it's legally occupied,
and secondarily, because they've now given their illegal
settlers official
capacity,
Those are military targets. That's their dynamic. And
that is also a way to look at
them using them as human shields.
And so as they're bombing these locations, and
explicitly as at least let's just say to
be objective at least what they're claiming and
what Robert would back up, that they're bombing
actual military locations. Because those also exist in
these areas that are supposed to be settlements
where people just it's all the way Tel
Aviv and Israel works.
Their central location for their military capacity is
right in the center of Tel Aviv anyway.
All these things and that or that I
mean, there's even Zionist discussions about how that's
kinda the case. So bringing this back to
the point.
Lebanon has been bombing
since this started.
If not constantly,
but intermittently, and in different surges because of
what's going on in Gaza. Same with Yemen.
Same with many other locations that are simply
standing up, specifically the Houthis and and Hezbollah,
to stand up for
Gaza and their self determination. And I've explicitly
stated, as I'll read right now, that they
would stop the moment that they stop their
attacks on Gaza.
But they don't wanna do that, you see?
Because they want what they want at the
expense of everybody else. So all if they
really wanted this to stop and get their
people back, which is part of that conversation,
then they could just stop. They could back
away and stop and it would all end.
That's been at least that's what they're promising,
and so far they've met pretty much everything
they've said they would do regardless of your
opinions about them. Israel has not.
So Israel uses the fact that they're bombing
illegal locations, which is under e international
law, legal under the Fort Geneva Convention for
armed resistance, and then they bomb civilian locations,
which they do constantly in Lebanon. This took
this to a whole another level. Now we're
gonna get into why this is so alarming.
1, just because of the simple concept of
what this means for what they're capable of,
but also because of the obvious point of
the infiltration of American tech
in this country.
And how on the record, on the surface
of their conversations, largely from people like Ben
Gavir and Smotrich,
they want the destabilization of the West. If
you don't know that, you're not listening. They're
telling you these things. They're openly discussing this.
And we've also played discussions that are a
little more one step removed. So for, like,
rabbis within this conversation
arguing that the idea of the migration into
Europe and the west is what needs to
happen for the end times to come. My
point is that is what Ben Gavir and
Smotrich are constantly pointing at. Not some side
point but the reality of the prophecies, of
the idea of fulfilling them for their interest.
I mean, this is not a secret.
And it should sound crazy because these people
are lunatics. But it is real. And you
if you just look at their accounts, they're
saying it all the time. So that has
to be considered in all of this. It
has to be considered in how this is
playing out and why those things might be
used against you, and maybe
already have.
When you go back to things like 911
or go back to many other events, or
the US' Liberty and how this is not
a new
or unique event. Your politicians have just hid
it from you for your entire life. Now
Robert wrote this on 18th. Israel carries out
large scale terrorist attacks in Lebanon.
It says this Tuesday, less than 24 hours
after the Israeli security cabinet officially agreed to
expand their Gaza
war aims, which remember, they already argued that
the West Bank is now one of their
new military focuses despite that being, I mean,
shockingly illegal like everything else. But even Jordan
and the United States were the ones saying
that West Bank is off limits. They do
nobody cares. They've shifted in. They've fully engaged
war in West Bank. Nobody says a word
because those people are either shockingly compromised or
already completely in line with what they wanna
do. Probably both, to be honest. The Blinken's
and the Bidens and the the rest of
them, Trump included or or the Matt Millers,
they're just full on supporting this stuff now.
But on top of that,
Lebanon,
they're now explicitly stating is gonna be part
of their war. And this was always what
Robert's been telling you was gonna happen. They're
trying to force the United States government. I
wish they saw a clip from Wilkerson saying
that from his inside information that their the
US government, the military specifically, is going, you're
on your own. We are not gonna jump
in with Iran or Lebanon if you make
this happen. Now it's hard to say whether
that will flush out or not, but Wilkerson
seems to be when he he tends to
what he says tends to be the reality
in in history what I've seen him say.
So either way,
they are pushing this either way regardless. And
so they've initiated that. Now despite at that
very moment, the US government standing up, as
always, and going, we're trying to deescalate.
Where Israel said, we wanna bring this back,
and then they do this.
So you have Israel going, we're gonna do
this. We're go or rather, we're gonna increase
the warfare. We're gonna aim at Lebanon. We're
gonna make the and the US lies for
them. And then under that lie cover, they
make this happen. There's no way to misunderstand.
I mean, either you can look at it
that the US government is a
a useful idiot in this conversation, which may
be somewhat true,
or they're part of it. And I think
it's it's kinda both, but it's really the
latter. The US government was aware of this.
I think we can prove that, and are
just now trying to hide that fact.
Now it says
that they expand their war in Gaza, including
stopping Hezbollah forces is what they claimed. Israel
inflicted the worst mass casualty event in Lebanon
since the Beirut port explosion. Now we covered
that at the time.
In my opinion,
I think that's over. We'll get to it.
No. I forget where that was. I have
it in here somewhere.
The point though,
is that was that was an Israeli attack,
in my opinion. Now really, I mean, the
evidence
that was what the evidence pointed to.
All the lies around it, weirdly enough, were
sat were completely satisfactory to all of the
governments that were pretending they cared.
Just so you understand the story, we're not
gonna go into it in-depth now, since the
point is that the information that was shown,
it was reviewed by weapons experts that were
like, that's absurd.
That these weren't bags of fertilizer, that you
guys were I mean,
what it really was, I think, still was
kinda somewhat left up in the air, but
the evidence clearly pointed to Israel.
And that was a I mean, in in
Lebanon, they called that their 911. I mean,
it was a horrifying event.
But, oh, they dismissed it and moved on.
I mean, yet you have an allegation from
Israel and the world stops for 2:8 people.
It's just it needs we need to well,
I shouldn't even say that. I think we
already recognize. I think most people watching this
and anybody with a brain and objectivity
is already kinda sensing there's a big problem
here.
He says over 4,000 casualties, which has increased
by now, were inflicted simultaneously across Lebanon,
indiscriminately
wounding men, women, and children, which is, by
the way, despite all the screeching narratives online,
is undeniably proven. Corporate media has covered this,
even Israeli sources have highlighted the fact that
children were killed, elderly, women, and in places
that there's no way they could've in any
way tried to control it. Despite their screaming
about how how
indiscriminate
and targeted the whole thing was because that's
all they can do.
And importantly,
wounding and killing Christians, Muslims, and Jews.
All affected by the Israeli decision to rig
pagers and secondarily walkie talkies with amounts of
explosives, which does seem to be what ultimately
played out.
Detonating them in many different civilian locations.
Now videos emerged, and I'll play this one
in a second for you, from across Lebanon
featuring adults and children thrown to the ground
after small explosions ripped flesh from their bodies
in packed marketplaces,
stores, and in streets. Lebanese hospitals also put
out calls for blood donations as the sheer
scale of the injure became difficult to deal
with all at once. In and of itself
might be something right there to look into.
You know, what maybe they tainted the blood
I mean, just thinking outside the box. Like,
I send this I tend to see how
Israel
has secondary agendas with all this, like with
the flooding and black water and the disease
aspect. Like, this is how they do these
things. And they know that people are paying
attention, they just don't care.
When Western media called it an attack targeting
Hezbollah,
widely refraining from even blaming Israel,
the first victim was a 10 year old
girl.
Then, one day later, Israel began detonating walkie
talkie devices
that contained even larger explosive charges. These devices
exploded inside people's homes, cars,
motorbikes, as somebody points out. Do you ever
pretend this is discriminate, but yet you blow
it up inside of a car, which the
point is they didn't even know where these
things were, and that car crashes and kills
a family of 6. Like, the point is,
that is in no way meeting the the
the necessary
metrics to make this a targeted attack or
even legal by any stretch of the imagination.
Everybody was standing outside of Israel in the
US blind support is telling you that.
And on top of that, the devices exploded
in their homes as well as a funeral
procession. And you know what bothers me almost
more than anything? The fact that this was
the next day, and it was at a
funeral procession for one of the kids that
died in that first attack.
At least as the reporting I've seen from
these locations is highlighted. The western media all
but applauded these art attack these actions, even
describing them as movie style plots or innovative.
I mean, it's just sickening, the kind of
sycophants we're seeing, the blind support, which it
seems like they're going right listen to my
point about the opportunism. Just because you see
them highlighting the genocide,
they fall right back into line when it's
needed.
The reality of this situation is that Israel
just carried out an act of terrorism against
Lebanon.
If this situation was the other way around,
which most people are pointing out, and Hezbollah
had managed to rig communication devices belonging to
Israeli reservists and high ranking military officials, then
detonating them all,
knowing that some of them were in the
hands of civilians and that others were carrying
them while in a civilian capacity. That's also
a point many people aren't pointing out.
It let's just say this was a Hamas
member in their bed.
Killing them in their bed is a crime.
Whether or not they're Hamas member, whether or
not you call them terrorists, they're not in
a military capacity.
Just because they don't want that to happen,
or because they make up crazy narrative to
justify killing them along with their 40 members
of the family because that's how the it
doesn't change the fact that it's still illegal.
At some point, we're all hoping that this
eventually fleshes out, which is horrifying to even
say out loud, to the point that they
will reflect on all of the people they've
killed despite all the lies. Because of the
UN and all the human rights groups and
everybody withstanding under the United States, highlighting that
we don't care what you're saying right now.
We all know these are crimes. This has
been genocide since day 1. We can see
what you're doing. You can't collected punishment, bombing
400 people to allegedly try to kill 1
guy that wasn't there. These are one of
these alone
should put people in prison.
We're talking a year plus.
It's just terrifying
that this could even continue to happen with
the support of all the people screaming that
they're the ones leading the rules based order.
Now, again, even if these were all military
targets, the point is
that they would call it terrorism. That's what
Robert's saying in this last point.
If if this was pagers explicitly used by
only IDF members in active duty, they would
still call it a terrorist act, and you
know that.
It says knowing that some or the last
point being, it would be instantly labeled as
an appalling act of terrorism. Matthew Miller, of
course, told journalists at a press briefing that
he was not aware of the operation and
was not involved.
Except we'll go through all the evidence to
suggest that's clearly not the case. Including an
example of the Beirut Medical Center, the American
University of Beirut Medical Center, weirdly replacing their
pagers 2 weeks before this happened.
The truth is, the United States government is
standing behind Israel's every move when it comes
to their offensive actions against Lebanon, Syria, Iran,
Yemen, and all the other regional actors.
When Israel bombed Yemen's Hodeidah port and inflicted
90 civilian casualties, which was bad of it,
nobody even cared,
the US denied involvement.
In June, when Israel managed to take take
back 4 of its captives while killing a
lot more, allegedly held in Gaza's Nusrat refugee
camp, killing almost 300 civilians
and injuring 700 more with clear US intelligence
backing.
Washington also claimed it had no idea. It
wasn't involved. The evidence proved explicitly otherwise. They
don't care. When Israel bombed the consular seg
segment of the Iran embassy
in Damascus I mean, in no way no
the point of that one was that there's
no way. Republicans were trying to scream how
it was not the same. It was a
crime of the highest order. No matter who
was there, no matter what the concept, this
was a embassy building that they bombed.
And, again, you'd think you'd think one of
these things might go, okay. We can't stay.
US government, we can't support that. Nope. Doesn't
matter. Rules based order accept everything they do.
And, of course, the United States also claimed
to have no idea what happened and who
even attacked the embassy.
More recently, in late June, right after Israeli
prime minister returned from the US and had
delivered a speech about the need for absolute
victory
over Iran's axis of evil,
there are suddenly 2 major provocations in both
Iran and Lebanon.
What he means by absolute victory, of course,
is for his interests. At the expense of
literally everybody, including Israelis, as you're seeing them
protest in the streets saying they do not
support them. That they are getting their families
killed in Gaza, despite how the screeching liars
of Aviva Clampas and the rest would tell
you when they say that, they're speaking to
you. No. No. They're talking to Netanyahu and
how their leaders have let them down because
they could've brought them home 14 times now
and have chosen not to. Their own statements
make that clear.
He says there are suddenly 2 major provocations
in both Iran and Lebanon. 1st, Israel launches
air strikes into a civilian building in the
Lebanese capital Beirut, killing Hezbollah commander, Faud Shukur,
along with women and children, including 74 excuse
me, injuring 74.
So right there, the argument. Was this guy
in a military capacity? Is Hezbollah even a
terrorist organization in the context that would justify
such a bombing, killing innocent people along with
him? The point is that this is a
political
organization.
I'm not support just like just like I
would point out how our US military has
done horrifying things around the world.
Think about the overlap there, guys. Just because
there's things they've done bad, which, I mean,
my god, look at what the US military's
done, Does not change the dynamic
of what they ultimately are. It's an organization
and in many cases, it's like it's like
them calling the Iranian government and military
terrorism. It is absurd what's ultimately happening today.
They label that anything they want to attack.
And so the bottom line here is that
when they bomb this guy, even if you
wanna pretend he's Hamas, whatever else you wanna
think is justifiable,
along with his family in a location that
was not in military capacity is a crime,
no matter how they're spending this. But nobody
cares in position to do something about it.
He says then, hours later, Israel also assassinated
the leader of Hamas. You know, the Hamas
that Israel funds up until 2020. Or, excuse
me, up until October 7th.
2020 was when the Mossad
leader, head of the Mossad, went there to
petition Qatar to continue funding Hamas.
Just for the person who's right now, but
typing out how that's not true,
here's the article for you from 2020.
Going forward,
it says
then they targeted the leader, Hamas, in Iran's
capital.
In both these cases, the US said it
had no idea what had happened, was not
informed, and did not take part in it,
Despite the Biden administration claiming at the time
to seek de escalation when the issue triggered
at the United Nations Security Council meeting, the
US and UK
chose to both dedicate their time to condemning
Iran for stoking regional tensions. I mean, guys,
that it it should make you laugh out
loud. Everything they're pointing to are groups they
simply claim Iran is backing or I mean,
not backing because that is the reality, they're
backing their right for self determination, but the
idea that they are Iran.
Hamas, one of them, despite the obvious provable
reality of Israel funding Hamas and the lie
about the I mean, everything.
They simply lie to you about these things
to justify what they're doing.
The idea of Iran stoking tensions, I mean,
there's plenty of things I could criticize about
Iran. But you show me the same kind
of genocide that they're committing in Gaza. You
show me the same kind of occupation they
have in Syria or Lebanon. You show me
the same kind of terrorism they've been carrying
out for 75 years. Or how about the
United States government?
Even if you wanna take every claim they've
ever made about Iran at face value, it
does not even
come to a fraction of what these people
have done in the world. And yet, they
want you to believe they're the ones I
mean, it's just it's it's absurd. We should
be concerned about every government, is ultimately the
point. Now it says the US refused to
acknowledge that Israel, of course, was responsible for
the assassination in Iran, let alone condemn it.
Despite it being completely illegal in every sense.
Instead, choosing to blame the victims of the
aggression and warn them not to take further
action.
You know, despite every other moment saying Israel
has the right to defend itself, and then
when the same thing happened, oh, that you
can't defend yourself, that's a crime.
In fact, when the US officials are asked
whether Iran has the right to self defense,
I've shown you these clips, they simply refuse
to even answer the question.
Instead, parroting a line about Tehran funding terrorism
because that's the only thing they can do.
Without any actual evidence to back these things
up.
Now it says it is clear that Tel
Aviv does not seek to be the one
viewed as initiating the war with Lebanon,
and wants to provoke Hezbollah into taking retaliatory
measures, which could be interpreted as starting such
a conflict.
Because, I mean, just you could talk about
Wilkerson's point. Maybe they think they can trick
them into going, Well, we didn't start it.
Either way, it's obvious that they know, which
is, I mean, militarily,
fundamentally provable, that they cannot defeat either of
these locations clearly. They need the US
basically holding their hand or taking the front.
And this is about trying to push them
into that position.
Every single time he writes Israel has attempted
to provoke a wider war with Lebanon,
Hezbollah has chosen to deescalate
by responding with much hamer attacks than Israel's
initial provocations.
While Israel has killed nearly 200 civilians in
Lebanon just since October 8th,
even Hezbollah began firing on military positions along
southern Lebanese border. Hezbollah has been killed a
has only killed a handful of Israeli settlers,
opting instead to target, guess what, soldiers and
military targets. Now, they only hyped how many
rockets are flying. You know why? Because what
he said there is easily provable.
And it's also illegal occupation areas. It's also,
whether they're even illegal Lebanese areas, illegal settlements
in and of themselves. And the bottom line
is what they are targeting are those, and
you can prove this. But again, tell come
to your own conclusions about it. Simply recognizing
that it is illegal and they do have
the right to arm resistance, and the civilians
they're bombing in Lebanon have been killed.
It's all it's it's unnerving to watch how
clear this continues and you just get the
same I mean, it's obvious. The people supporting
them don't care about the law. They don't
care about human rights. They don't care about
you. They care about their agenda, and, clearly,
that seems to be it.
It says it's clear that Hezbollah views his
limited military operations against Israeli military targets in
the north of occupied Palestine
to be achieving their desired goals, serving as
a one front as a one front in
an ongoing war of attrition that has the
ultimate goal of securing a victory for the
Palestinian resistance groups in Gaza through
a ceasefire agreement.
And they made this clear. The moment that's
done,
they're done. They're stopping.
So ask yourself, if they really wanted this
to stop, then that's what would ultimately happen.
Even again, think about it. They're also telling
you in other conversations they do want that
deal. They do want their people back.
Even Netanyahu's now trying to float some new
idea. We'll probably talk about that possibly tomorrow,
if not the next show. Or do we'll
have a pirate's dream planned tomorrow.
That ultimately, we want our hostage back. And
we'll even float a deal to pull everybody
out. As long as Hamas leaves, we'll end
this whole thing. Okay. Well, then, there you
go. They're offering it. But you don't want
that. Not true.
Now it says, however,
we have now entered a new phase of
the war, he writes. Israel is now officially
announcing Lebanon is within its scope of the
war.
And that the goal of returning some a
100000 Israelis who have fled their settlements near
the Lebanese border will only be achieved through
force. Okay. So all he could say all
he said right there is, these illegal settlements
that are illegal in everyone's mindset, the world
around, the UN has been calling this out
during these these
faux conversations they're having as Israel just calls
everyone racist.
And these they're simply going our goal is
to put those people back in those illegal
settlements. How is this the conversation right now?
Because the people leading this are completely illegitimate
criminals.
The US government, everyone supporting this, knows that's
illegal. And now you're gonna allow them to
fight a war against a foreign country to
make sure those illegal settlements can be put
back in place?
Yep.
It's pretty crazy.
Now it says Hezbollah has made its position
crystal clear.
It does not seek a full scale war,
of course, you could say they're lying, but
their actions pretty much back this up, and
is providing a supporting a support role to
Gaza. The secretary general of Hezbollah
has repeatedly said that if Israel signs that
ceasefire agreement and prisoners exchange with Hamas,
they will immediately stop all their operations,
as well as Anzarallah in Yemen.
They vowed to stop.
They'll they'll move their blockade, they will stop,
if they simply stop their genocide.
Think about how crazy that is, and they
just say no.
Yet Israel's rulership is not interested in signing
a ceasefire and does not really care about
returning its captives alive. Instead, it seeks an
impossible total victory.
And again, at the expense of everybody, including
their own people. The Israeli military has already
invaded every single area of the Gaza Strip
and has failed to defeat Hamas or return
its captives.
So now it's turning its focus to Lebanon.
Always a great article from Robert.
Include this for you as well so you
remember what
who funds Hamas.
Now Dan Cohen pointed this out on 17th.
Now I kinda keep this chronological, but we
jump around a little bit. But so this
is on 17th. He says Israel is pushing
for the US to join an all out
war against Lebanon and Iran.
Overnight, Netanyahu added to the list of goals
the safe return of citizens to their homes
near the border. Right? Again, putting people back
in their illegal occupation.
Out and which serves as their human shield
buffer.
Hours later, thousands of beepers exploded in Lebanon
in a massive terrorist attack targeting Hezbollah fighters
and civilians alike.
The close associate of Netanyahu, Topaz Luke, credited
Israel for the attack quickly before deleting his
post. 2 it's already out, by the way.
It's they've already publicly accepted that. Probably because
they, just like always, are never really in
control of their narratives and somebody dumped it
out there. Some they accept. Either way, the
point is Israel has accepted and stated they
did this. An Israeli group called Fighting for
the North credits Israel for the attack and
demands Netanyahu launch a full scale war on
Lebanon. He says, quote, we expect this to
be the opening blow of a war in
the north and not another one off operation,
however impressive it may be. This is an
opportunity that must not be missed under any
circumstances.
So Israel's definitely pushing for all at war.
The Biden administration, as he writes, is a
ghost ship. And I argue it would be
almost worse. But, you know, either way, both
sides are going to continue sporting this.
Will Jake Sullivan, he asked, or whoever is
running the foreign policy, agree to a full
will full full war against Lebanon and Israel?
Wilkerson seems to think the Pentagon at the
very least is saying no, but that's not
necessarily the only thing that matters. Are Americans
ready to die in World War 3, he
says, to protect Netanyahu from criminal prosecution and
keep genocidal Israel from collapsing?
I don't I mean, there I know I
know in my heart for sure that the
majority of conservatives and liberals, the majority of
this country does not believe that.
But the partisanship,
2 party paradigm, the team sport politics very
much does. Now here's a video of
the the marketplace. Just one of the early
videos to show you. This is one of
the many examples of what we saw.
It's obvious there's a lot of civilians in
this location.
Women, children, men, we it it it goes
off and hurts people who are just in
the vicinity.
Now, to be to add a point that
people have highlighted, and that we should obviously
question everything, the entire I mean, everything, guys.
But some people are arguing that we should
at least ask, you know, that this entire
thing was a big facade. Which is certainly
possible.
But I for me, it's hard to wrap
my mind around how that makes sense in
the context of why Lebanon would be talking
about, you know, but but certainly question that.
I just wanna include that because I've I've
seen people bring that up. That maybe this
whole thing was, you know, like anything. But
it's hard if you got more evidence of
that, I would love to see that. That's
fascinating to me. But I don't think that
adds up for me.
Now here
is t what Tim Anderson posted. There's a
a gentleman discussing his opinion around what this
the kind of the absurdity of all of
this as it's called the Israeli Motorola massacre.
Drill planted explosives on pagers and detonated them
remotely in a wide range of Lebanese civilian
spaces, including grocery shops, busy city streets, medical
facilities.
And since the media is not reporting this
accurately, I thought I'd just clarify
very quickly that this is the definition of
state sponsored terrorism,
and the US is busy legitimizing the cyber
terror attack. Again,
Israel detonated thousands of bombs in Lebanon knowing
that this will harm and kill children, civilians,
medics, and passers
by who are just going about their daily
lives in markets and on the street.
This is terrorism. I mean, imagine if another
country remotely blew up tons of devices inside
Israel and killed a bunch of people.
Or
think about it like this. This jumped into
my head. How about the idea of the
US government? Right? Okay. Well, hypothetically, the US
government's currently occupying Syria. Right? What if Syria,
like, from a government perspective, like a military
the Syrian military decided to do this, but
only targeted US military personnel in Syria? Which
I don't want to happen. I don't think
I don't want anybody to be hurt. The
reality being, that would be a legal targeted
that would be a attack on an occupied
force.
The legal armed resistance against the military legal
illegal occupation of Syria. And then only targeting
military personnel? Well, I mean, look. It doesn't
even matter about occupation. I mean, it does.
But the bigger point is the US government
clearly invaded Syria. That's Syrian territory. So they
have the right to fight back. That's actual
self defense. What's crazy though is you already
know. You don't they don't even need to
tell you they would call it a terrorist
act attack against the US government. You know
that. So the point is to think about
this in the broader context of how it
would apply almost anywhere else except in this
one.
And the big question, obviously, is why do
you think that is?
The US would,
I mean,
you know what they do. In general, yes.
Of course, we support,
operations to target Hezbollah militants who continue to
launch terrorist attacks against civilians.
Israel has a right to defend itself. Again,
that is the that's the mantra.
I argue the evidence suggests otherwise.
And I only say that because it could
be objective because, obviously, I'm not there, but
the evidence that we can see and I
I, you know, I I put a lot
of weight on what Robert says and what
his research shows. The point being that that
does not appear to be what we're talking
about,
Including the fact that if you really look
into the bigger sense, that they're only seemingly
targeting the illegal occupied areas. And those have
been given official capacity. So what are we
talking about? Those are military targets.
Against terrorism and a right to carry out
legitimate attacks against terrorists. Not civilians, but terrorists.
So as a general proposition, yes, of course.
Okay. So let me go take you back
to the legitimacy of targets and so on.
Yesterday,
a group of settlers attacked a school
in Jericho.
They beat up the students. They broke their
bone. They beat up their teachers and so
on. Mhmm. Are they a legitimate target? Should
they be a legitimate target by the same
kind of definition that in which you have
defined the other target? Our our
Of course, he goes on to just completely
just sidestep the question and act, oh, Israel
will look into that. No. They're completely they've
given them official capacity. And it's a it's
a shocking video if you haven't seen it.
They literally store it's a it's a school.
They're they're children, well, from like 18 all
the way down to younger. And they go
in there with big sticks and just start
beating people up. Why? Because they hate Palestinians.
It's as simple as that. And nobody cares.
In fact, usually, they've got IDF support to
back them up against the unarmed civilians.
This is the reality.
Now, in regard to the US being involved,
you might find this quite interesting. Ashpad Vibes
highlights this. The US State Department says that
they were not involved.
In unrelated news, the American University of Beirut
Medical Center replaced the pagers of the doctors
and staff 2 weeks ago. But just completely
verifiable. And so what's interesting about this, and
this is just one side point, it's obvious
to me the US government was very aware
of what's going on here for many obvious,
you know, strategic reasons.
But we need to really ask about whether
or not
this is an example of the US government
facilitating
the act,
working with them, allowing this. Now it's also
possible Israel could have used this relationship like
it does all the time. It takes advantage
of these mindless politicians
constantly
and laughs about it on video, and they
still don't change. So that has to tell
you something.
I I don't I I did get this
one. Hold on.
I think I'll get to that in a
minute. The point is he denies knowing anything.
That's what the video there is. And so
overall,
it's clear that the US government played a
role in this, I would say.
Now Mary Kostakaitis
points out an important discussion from New York
Times. Here's the article if you wanna check
it out for yourself.
American officials
tell the New York Times it was Israel,
which shouldn't be shocking because that's pretty public
now, but guess what? That was in 17th.
So here you got Matt Miller,
standing up and going, oh, hey. We don't
know. We weren't involved at all. Yet yet,
weirdly enough, US officials, before we even acknowledge
who was involved and who were responsible, are
going, it was Israel. We know because it
how do they possibly know that?
So US it's just simply points at conduct
the clear, deductive logic. So the US knew
about the pagers and injuries and deaths of
civilians that would result. New York Times, Israel
planted explosives and pagers that Hezbollah had bought
and then triggered them with fake messages, American
and other officials said. So my point would
be not just that it happened and they
were involved,
but they knew details.
They had pagers that they did. And how
they did okay. So how would they possibly
know that if Matt Miller, who's supposed to
be on the inside, is going, We don't
know yet. Because they were involved. And that's
how clumsy this is right now. I just
think they're acting with impunity now that they
care.
Hopefully, we can prove they're wrong, as they
end up in jail cells for murdering innocent
people.
Here's what Kirby had to say about this.
And guys, this is painful. This one in
particular, by the way, what Matt Miller does,
just no comment, like, very eerie, eerily showing
you how much they're involved.
Sources have confirmed to us. It's been wide
widely reported that Israel is responsible for this,
but notably, you still won't say that. Why
is that? Is it because that's not your
assessment or because you don't support what they're
doing yet? It's because I don't have anything
more to add on this issue, as I
said. That's kinda what you're gonna get the
whole time. Just not a not a yes
or no. Like, just very politic very, like,
legally speaking, like, we're not gonna give you
anything.
How do you not take that as you're
clearly criminal you're you know, either you're covering
for them or you're clearly criminally involved. And
it's it's not that's my opinion. But you
tell me what you think. How do you
answer like this, both of them, without you
knowing again, at a time when even the
the corporate media is is telling them that
Israel's involved, we know that, everyone's talking about
it, and they're like, no comment. We won't
give we don't need nothing nothing in the
right in the middle.
Is it because that's not your assessment or
because you don't support what they're doing here?
It's because I don't have anything more to
add on this issue. As I said, there
was no US involvement and I'm not gonna
go beyond that today. And you know what
I what jumped in my head right now?
What I think is because I don't think
this is over. I think this is an
ongoing
agenda. And that's that actually makes much more
sense to me now that they they don't
wanna give
any details at all because this is not
over yet. That's my again, my opinion, but
pretty eerie.
These kinds of tactics, blowing up pagers and
walkie talkies, is this type of warfare acceptable
to the United States? Again, Mary, I appreciate
the question. I'm simply not gonna be able
to address these incidents over the last couple
of days in any But see, that's not
about the incident. That's about a broad question.
Like, if I were in that room, I'd
frame it differently. Hypothetically speaking, if I were
to use, you know, somebody's cell phone
to blow them up, you know, the government
did, would that be a crime? They still
won't answer the question.
Even though it's obviously a broad question that
you would be able to answer, it's not
about Israel, It's about the premise of what
actually happened. Why? Because it's a crime. They
know it's a crime. These are the rules
based order. These are the good guys fighting
for freedom and liberty. Come on, guys. We
can't be this blind. And I'm speaking specifically
to those that think these people are gonna
lead you to some kind of new position,
whether left or right.
Level of of detail one way or another.
Okay. Let me try one one other thing.
Please. Yep. Everyone keeps urging, you know, all
parties involved not to escalate this. Isn't this
an escalation already? I mean Yes. Isn't this
Israel doing exactly what you've been warning them
not to do? Again, I'm not gonna speak
to the details of these incidents. I understand
that's frustrating. I I get it. And I
understand where all your questions are coming from.
They're all valid. They're all fair. Oh, so
it's all good because Kirby understands.
Thank god. I'm just not gonna get into
this. I will add,
if I could, restate a little bit to
what I said to Gabe.
We still don't wanna see an escalation of
any kind.
We don't believe.
All that means is Iran, you're not allowed
to do it. You can't fight back, or
Lebanon, or whatever we're talking about. It's because
the point is they did the same thing
to Iran last time. Right? They bombed them.
They bombed their capital. They assassinated
oh, you can't. You better not. That'd be
a crime.
It's, I mean, it's on its face, embarrassingly
hypocritical. And everyone can see that. You don't
just get to say, well, we deem you
bad guy, therefore you don't these don't apply.
All that shows you is the same old
narrative. The rules for me, not for the
rules for thee, not for me. Right? You
are acting like you just get to I
mean, they act with impunity. Simple as that.
That's what criminals do. That,
the way to solve,
where we're at,
in this crisis is by additional military operations
at all. We still believe
that the best way to prevent escalation,
to prevent another front from opening up in
Lebanon, is through diplomacy, which is why mister
Hochstein was over Hold on. Hold on. Stay
there.
The way to solve a little bit to
what I said to Gabe. We still don't
wanna see an escalation of any kind.
We don't believe
that,
the way to solve
where we're at,
in this crisis is by additional
military operations.
Okay. How do you take that at face
value when they're literally still arming Israel
in exactly that for against Lebanon or Gaza
or anything else they're doing? I mean, they're
literally screening about how they're gonna make this
they're broadening their war focus, and here he
is going, we don't think more military action
is the right path. But all he's doing
is saying Iran and Lebanon, you can't do
that. But we'll let Israel do it. We'll
we'll act like we stick our nose up
at it, but we'll keep giving them weapons
and arms and lying about what they do.
I mean, this is a this is a
dumpster fire. I mean, it is so incredibly
crazy that we're at this point. And, I
mean, again, I've said this many times, but
I don't know how it
the only people that are going along with
this are people that have an interest in
maintaining this narrative, maintaining the status quo, blindly
supporting Israel, or some kind of partisan narrative.
Like, literally, the rest of the world is
like, how in the world are we still
pretending this? How is this still happening? Now,
again, that you may think I mean, look
into it for yourself. Because in my opinion
now, it's very clear. And I I don't
know what the percentage is, but, I mean,
it's clear to me that the vast majority
of people, countries, organizations
are all pretty obviously pointing this stuff out
right now. Even Israelis are pointing this out.
And here we are. Keep lying about it.
At all. We still believe
that the best way to prevent escalation,
to prevent another front from opening up in
Lebanon is through diplomacy, which is why mister
Hochstein was over in the region this week.
And we're still gonna pursue those kinds of
outcomes.
Well, that would just be in general. What
what does the US know, about what happened?
There have been series of deaths and injuries
apparently from Sweden pagers.
Is it was the US the US have
any knowledge,
what does it know now, and and when
did it know of of what is happening?
So we are gathering information on this incident.
I can tell you that the US was
not involved in it.
The US was not aware,
of this incident in advance, and at this
point, we're gathering information.
Oh, so Robert made fun of this because
think about how dumb that is. So we're
gonna pretend that you're just like every you're
you're framing yourself as one of the journalists.
We're we're just trying to find out.
Really? So you're arming them and don't even
know what's going on? Like, either that's really
embarrassing
or they're lying. It's probably partly both.
And what information have you gathered so far?
We continue to collect information. I don't have
any quite any public readout to give now,
but, we're collecting information, in the same way
that journalists are across the world They to
They we're just like you. It's pretty pathetic.
Gather the facts about Just wanted to pin
down some of the basics again on the
exploding pages. Yeah. I mean, is it still
your position that you are not saying publicly
who you believe carried out these attacks? I
don't have any comment on it at all.
And is there any reason that you would
That's wild. Say why
what your assessment is of who carried these
out? I just don't have any comment on
it at all. Okay.
God, I mean, that's just creepy to me.
The smile, everything.
Just nothing. Move on. No more.
That's not we're not you know, it's it's
I mean, that's to me, that's more important
than actually his fake answers.
That's wild.
Now fear Theodore, Fieruel Isabel highlights the New
York Times
pointing out on 18th, mind you, while they're
still pretending we don't know, Israel planted explosives
and pagers sold to Hezbollah. Now that's the
way they framed this. The reality, as far
as I can tell, this was much more
broad and indiscriminate
than Hezbollah pagers, which I'll make a point
about. These were just pagers, in my opinion,
that were given out to people that you
know, you could argue that they were maybe
what they perceived to be,
Hezbollah and Hezbollah tangential people. At the end
of the day, there's more than enough evidence
to show that there were plenty of just
random people that had these things. And she
writes, breaking Israeli sources admit responsibility for attacks
on devices in Lebanon saying their attack is
phase 2
of Israeli intelligence op against Hezbollah and their
comms network.
New York Times claims Israel planted explosives in
recent batch of Taiwanese based pagers, and we'll
get to this. There's important information to understand
about what this group is and that will
segue into the conversation about why we need
to care so much about these Israeli startups
that are simply fronts for Israeli intelligence.
Now with the second one, Lebanon's rocked again
by exploding devices as they declare a new
phase of the war. These are the walkie
talkies they're discussing.
And here, Megatron simply shows you one of
these I'll show I'll show you a quick
video about this. Japanese made Icom walkie talkies
began exploding in Lebanon. Around a 100 people
have been injured. Now as much as there
is still very we'll touch on this explicitly,
the point about the concern about our devices
right now,
which
I'm right there with you, I'm concerned about
how far this may be reached,
but to be clear,
this appears to have been something that was
started 5 months ago. And so that's one
of the easiest points to show there's no
way they could've known where these things ended
up. They could've been anywhere in the world.
They could've been in the United States by
now, for all we know. They could've been
in there in Israel, for all we know.
And the point is that it's indiscriminate
on its face.
Now here is the, apparently, this is the
Japanese company that makes those walkie talkies, who's
who's basically
investigating the reality and making sure people know
that they weren't involved or at least saying
that. And all it said goes forward to
the company whose name is on the walkie
talkies that blew up on Wednesday are are
investigating.
And it's and it shows you these walkie
talkies, and it says Icom.
The manufacturer in Osaka, Japan says it discontinued
this specific device a decade ago.
That's pretty interesting.
And he says, I have a picture of
the device that exploded.
The the hologram sticker should be here.
The fact that the sticker is not on
here means we cannot determine if it's genuine.
He says the fact that the sticker yeah.
Say this which is isn't on the ones
that were used.
And it says the Icom says that it
sells product only to authorized distributors following Japan's
regulations.
We have a robotic production line that's very
fast. And so right there, you could argue
that there there's a point of infiltration potentially,
or any number of these things. The the
the distribution lines. My point is to think
about how Israel influences or infiltrates
the tech field out there today.
How exactly did they get in this? Did
did did I mean, it's certainly possible they
just found old versions of these, like he's
saying, or bought them up before and and
used this on a side project. But it
also could've been something where they infiltrated the
actual company or you can't make sure you're
considering all the possibilities. Because because this is
a real thing, guys. This is not some
kind of a hypothetical discussion. This happened. So
we have to consider what the real extent
of this might be.
And he simply says, and so there's no
time to set an explosive device. So his
point is it didn't happen in their factory.
So that that's what he's saying. Because of
how fast it goes, it wouldn't have been
possible.
Good point. And he says
oh, that was the last part. So they're
just pointing out they weren't involved. Now, o
s I n d a t defender
is simply highlighting what Sky News said. So
I think it's important to just be skeptical
about all these, but simply pointing out that,
Mossad was able to inject a compound, and
they're claiming, obviously, in sources from Israel about
what I think it's, well, just the acronym
is p e PETN,
into specifically the batteries
of new encrypted pagers. But the point was,
at least with the walkie talkies, that they
were old. So the question on the pagers
is a different dynamic. Right? But the so
they're claiming they were new, that or either,
I guess, at least new to the people
that were using them. And that Hasbullo began
using around February before they even arrived in
the hands of the members. They're claiming only
Hasbullo, but, again, that's not the reality. It's
obvious these were in the hands of plenty
of innocent people, allowing them to remotely overheat
and detonate the lithium battery within the device.
Now that's interesting though because
I don't know if I believe that fully
pictured because if it was overheating, why was
it simultaneous?
Why was it the text messages that caused
it? Maybe it was the message that triggered
the overheating. These are all these are these
are important questions to ask. But the point
is that they gate like, or are they
overlapping with the with the walkie talkie?
How do these things line up with the
walkie talkies if they were 10 years old?
How did they end up in their hands?
The pagers were delivered, but, you know, there's
a lot of anomalies to this. Another reason
why you might wanna question the validity of
the larger story.
Now, getting into the important part of this,
around
the company behind it. Freddie Pontone did an
excellent work on this.
And this again, getting into the startup nation,
the startup. Israeli Unit 8200 intelligence overlap startups
being seeded around the world. And we're gonna
get to the most important part today, coming
back to an article Whitney wrote for TLAB,
The Prince and the Spy, discussing
this very point about their own statements of
how they infiltrate
these fields. Israel blurs the line between defense
apparatus and local cyber cybersecurity. That's 2018. We'll
come back to that. Now, Freddie writes, the
start up company, Norta Global,
registered in Bulgaria, finds itself involved with the
killer pagers. The capital
of only BGN 200, just above a $100,
was transferred to the Hungarian
DSK Bank, I believe that's Denmark. Right? By
the
39 year old lawyer in Sofia,
Atanas v,
the the citing the the law this,
legislator, the court case in April 22,002.
Now guess was did I I think DSK
applies to just Hungary. Right? But tell me
I think that's what that stands for. The
DSK, I believe, is that let me know
in the chat just so we can clarify
that. And it says the balance sheets of
the company were more than modest until
someone poured $1,600,000
into the start up. Now this is an
example of simply co opting other startups, which
is also part of this dynamic.
But on he posted this on the on
19th,
6:43 AM. This one goes back to a
little like an hour before that. And he's
simply pointing out the Norta Global Limited in
Sofia, Bulgaria, another empty shell used by Israeli
intelligence, and we will flush this out.
But he says this is the other post
that he,
quit
tweet quotes or quote tweets. Sorry. Can't stalk
right now. The killer pagers in this thread,
he writes, Israel's Mossad spy agency planted a
small number of the explosives inside the 1,000th
of pagers sold in Lebanon months before.
Images of the destroyed devices showed a format
and stickers consistent with the AR 924 model
of pagers and Gold Apollo branding. However, the
firm's founder said the devices were actually made
under license with Budapest Firm. Now this is
where it's important to realize that they took
over this company and then produced these things
using old models, I guess, which is what
we're seeing from the Japanese company. Or, excuse
me, that's the the walkie talkie. In the
case here, we're still talking about the models
that they're using to produce, and they're simply
saying it was the the actual owner here
or the, where did I miss it? It
says CEO? The founder. Excuse me. The founder,
Hsu Ching Kuang. So the devices were actually
made under license at Budapest by a firm
called BAC Consulting using Gold Apollo name. Right?
So the illusion of being through this company,
but really being a secondary kind of, what
what do you call that? A,
like a
oh, what's the term for that?
I can't remember the term. Like, if you
open a restaurant and then you open, like,
a secondary version of it, but you're not
part of the main company.
God. I can't can't remember the names. But
so, either way, the point is that it's,
like, it's under the illusion of that company,
but they're clearly not. And this is BAC
Consulting was created by Barbara Chamberlain
in Chicago in 2000. Barbara grew up in
a moo in Michigan.
Yeah. I'm just jumping through for the but
this this is important to read, but, ultimately,
I wanted to try to keep this show
reasonably shorter than usual.
Barbara Chamberlain, profile on LinkedIn. You can check
it out for yourself. Here's her image. This
is well, this is Christina, actually.
1 of BAC's consulting's many projects was bridging
technology and innovation from Asia. The aim of
this project was to develop international technology cooperation
among countries for the sale of telecommunication products.
I mean, the weren't this is all building
into the major point. I'm just trying to
jump through this for you. Franchise. Thank you
for the chat. Franchise, I was talking about.
Now he ultimately leaves us up in the
air, but the point was as he comes
through, which we'll get to in a second,
is that this is in fact an Israeli
company, but we'll come back to that. Mariam
Barghouti so keep in mind at this point,
he's talking about simply the idea that we
have the connection, a company that is being
used kind of secondarily to produce these things.
Mariam
Barghouti points out that according to Lebanese security
sources, the explosive devices that resulted in the
injuries of 1,000 in Lebanon today and in
Syria, she wrote this on 17th,
and the killing of at least 9, including
children were,
imported 5 months ago.
Implanted up to 20 grams of explosive material,
this means this was premeditated
and pre planned months ago by Israel. Now,
but the reality of this is outside of
Israel as well. Now, that could show you
simply the breadth of how not discriminate this
was, that some of these found their way
outside of the location or
that it was not planned, I mean, not
aimed at anything in particular, but the bottom
line is that it killed civilians. And it
was planned so long ago that there's no
way they could've known where these would end
up. Not entirely.
Now here is a doctor you're familiar with,
Doctor Abu Sita. We've talked about him in
the past, he was in Gaza for a
while and he was telling you what he
was seeing and it was horrifying.
Here he is, dealing with people hurt in
the Beirut.
And it's the same thing we're the it's
the lies that we're hearing. It's the reality
just in contrast to lies we're hearing from
Israel.
As he says,
almost all the victims will end up with
some permanent disabilities, and we are talking about
civilians here.
Who have you been dealing with, and how
have they been? And then give us paint
if you can, paint us a picture
of the type of injuries of the survivors
are dealing with and what you're doing in
the theater because you've come out of theater.
I see you you you know, you're ready
to go back in again.
Tell paint a picture of what's going on
inside the hospital.
So these pages went off randomly. Some people
were in their car in confined spaces. Some
people were next sitting next to some of
the wounded.
Some of them were in the house when
they exploded.
And so what you have is a different
kind of collection of people,
of all ages,
men and women who've come in with that
blast injury.
The catastrophic thing is that almost all of
them will end up with some residual
disability,
some permanent disability.
The hands,
overwhelming majority,
have been mangled with a lot of amputations,
and a lot of the shrapnel's gone into
the eyes with Mhmm. Almost loss of eyes
with Mhmm. Almost loss of eyesight, complete in
one eye and some, unfortunately, in both eyes.
Right. So the reason that's the point, both
hands and eyes seem to be one of
the big foots. They obviously what they the
pager went off,
and they bring them up and look at
it. Right? And so the hands and the
eyes seem to be the focal point of
most of the damage. Some of them are
on their hip and their side and so
on. But some of the art claims we're
gonna get into the responses from the politicians,
both US and otherwise, and or supposed journalists.
The responses make me sick.
Laughing about this. We'll get into it. You
know, Randy Fine, for example. You know, the
big MAGA hero that Trump supports, openly yet
again going, good. Keep going. Take their eyes.
Like, this guy is an absolute monster.
He is a US politician.
Oh, it's openly endorsed by Donald Trump, and
that's scary to me. Asal Radd points out
noncombatants were also drawn into the fray. This
is from the New York Times.
New York Times is trying really hard to
avoid saying Israel killed civilians because that's what
it means.
Drawn into the fray. What is this? A
field of war now? We're talking about civilian
locations and markets. People were murdered by exploding
devices in civilian locations, and the best they
can do is put noncombatants
were drawn in. It's
disgusting.
As well as the BBC, she says half
the death toll are children and medical staff.
Half killing civilians in random explosions would be
called terrorism
if anyone else did it. But when it's
Israel, they call it Hezbollah pager explosions.
That's what BBC points out. And again, even
in their own article, including 2 children and
4 health care workers.
Michael Tracey points out another article. All these
are very public. You could look these up
for yourself. Fatima was in the kitchen on
Tuesday when a pager on the table began
to beep, her aunt said.
2 women, by the way. She picked up
the device and to bring it to her
father hold on. Oops. There we go. To
bring it to her father and was holding
it when it exploded, mangling her face and
leaving the room covered in blood. Fatima was
trying to take courses in English. She loved
English.
Tracy says this is what happened to a
9 year old girl who was killed yesterday,
killed, in Lebanon
because of the pager attack. Such incredible technological
innovation. Couldn't be more impressed.
He's obviously being sarcastic.
Now, of course, what do you get from
the Israeli Zionist disgusting terrorist 9 mentality right
now?
Well, then, Gucci, he shouldn't have been a
Hezbollah terrorist. Because that you've proven that? You
don't even know who they're talking about. The
point is that at the end of the
day, the narrative
is vomited over the top of anything, including
innocent people being killed, because they don't care.
Owen Jones says, if Hezbollah blew up the
phones and pages of Israeli reservists, inevitably killing
and maiming children and bystanders,
those cheering on Israel now would be denouncing
an obscene act of terrorism. Everybody knows that.
And Biden says anyone publicly cheering
on in the West would be liable for
arrest.
But not with this, not with the reverse.
That's what we're seeing, people being arrested both
by the whatever administration's in place, if you
dare point out crimes of Israel.
Francesca Albanese highlighting with the Lemkin Institute. Now
early on in this genocide,
even Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders pointed to
the Limpkin Institute and Limpkin, quote, making arguments
about why they were doing the right thing.
Here's the Limpkin Institute, which by the way
already spoke out very early saying they were
committing genocide,
saying the Lemkin Institute condemns Israel's terrorist attacks
against Lebanese people in the past 2 days.
And this is the this is why they've
tried to point to them early, the Lemkin
Institute for genocide prevention.
And they're calling it genocide.
It says and not this, but obviously what's
going on in Gaza. And it says, using
explosive pagers and walkie talkies, it has killed
29 Lebanese people. Wounded at least 3,200,
including 9 year old Fatima,
and an
11 year old boy. While supporters of Israel
claimed that all victims were terrorists, because that's
what they always do, that claim does not
appear to be born out of the evidence,
as always.
Certainly, a 9 year old and an 11
year old were not terrorists.
Hezbollah,
the ostensible target, in quotes, of the attacks,
because there really wasn't a target, it seems,
is not a simple terrorist organization engaged in
criminal activity. As much as they don't like
that narrative we talked about and US and
Israel will scream otherwise, it's an objective reality.
Same with Ansar Allah or the Houthis.
They're not what they pretend they are. I'm
not saying that makes them everything they do
good, just like the US military point I
said before. But they are not
I mean, look. You wanna compare terrorist actions?
Compare it to what Zionism has done in
its entire existence. Or the US military. Or
compare it to other the ISIS or Al
Qaeda, which the US government is real fond
and support and give medical treatment to. You
won't even find a fraction of what they're
talking about.
And it says, it is also a political
party and service provider for Southern Lebanon. Because
that's true. It also includes civilian doctors, nurses,
teachers, and so forth.
Isn't that important?
Right? I mean, this is like saying you're
bombing or attacking UNRWA because you claim they're
Hamas, and saying it doesn't matter because they're
all bad guys. The point is, Hezbollah does
in fact have other aspects of its dynamic.
Not all of them are the military wing,
and they don't care.
So even if you don't like Hezbollah or
think all of them are bad, there is
military capacity under the law, and that doesn't
apply. And everybody with standing is telling you
that other than the people blindly supporting Israel.
When does collateral damage become the point?
They ask. It says, what we see is
a genocide state that is completely out of
control and supported by a Western world that
is, in their opinion, in large measure, too
racist and Islamophobic to care. Now I don't
know if I necessarily agree with that by
and large. I would say that the ruling
conversation
is presenting a lot of that. But at
the end of the day, I don't believe
most people feel that way. That's my opinion
though. It says, since yesterday's well, I would
add too though, that it's hard for the
outside entity to see that, right, because they're
only seeing through the lens of propaganda just
like we are.
But it says, what we see is a
genocidal or next one. It says, since yesterday's
attacks, Israel has declared a new phase
in its hopeless and destructive, quote, war.
We call on all nations, the Lemkin Institute,
of moral conscience
and sanity,
to intervene immediately, to stop this slaughter of
Arab peoples before the world the whole world
is drawn down into the breathtaking
moral collapse
and darkness
that we all see before our eyes. That
is powerful.
My point is, I think we all know
that everyone feels this way.
What are we gonna do about it?
The genocide of Palestinians must stop. Israel's international
escalation and expansion of violence must stop. Since
the UN is weak and the West is
complicit,
a concerted intervention for peace and justice must
be made by the broad coalition from the
global south. Of course, that's gonna really bother
the people that act like that's you know,
look. We should be skeptical of all of
them. I'm not necessarily saying one group over
the other should take control of anything. But
the reality is that people that have conscience
or care about people's lives
need to stand up and push back against
the power structures that are keeping it going.
So agree with them in that dynamic or
not, the reality, ultimately, in their mind, seems
to be that they think that entity will
help stop this. It doesn't necessarily have to
be and they think that will bring some
rising tide of freedom to the world. I
don't even agree with that. But the point
is without such an effort, regional and global
war are not far off, and the wanton
slaughter of all mankind will rule the day
once more.
It's a good point, and it's sad because
I think a lot of people will ignore
it.
She just simply quotes one of the parts
there. Franchesca Albanese, you are repertoire.
Now Tiberius points out, and this is in
response, essentially, but we're starting with it, to
all the people we'll cover next.
Despite the reality, and I mean, like, the
provable evidence that everyone is engaging with, even
the corporate media for crying out loud, that
this was indiscriminate, they try and that children
and women were killed,
Most everybody that is in a position to
support Israel is just
bleeding that it was the most and how
many times do I say this? The most
discriminant targeted attack in the history of warfare
in every universe that's ever existed. Like, ridiculous.
Instead of simply saying, no. It was not
indiscriminate, you have to go so far over
the top to make people feel uncomfortable.
Like with the starving.
No. We're not starving them. They've got more
food than they've ever had in their history.
That's things that Elon Levy says, which we'll
point at.
Instead of just saying, no. No. We're feeding
them, like we're supposed to,
they they make it cartoonish. And maybe there's
a real maybe they're just that clumsy.
Like I've said before, this is what it
looks like to acknowledge a power structure that
did not earn what it has.
But this is what Tiberias says. This is
what this was it's a quote. This was
actually a precision attack, only targeting specific military
personnel. We keep searing these. Now that even
would be a more measured response.
That no. No. We just targeted military. And
that would be what I would expect from
the propaganda in reverse. But you're gonna see
some of the most cartoonish responses
in any context.
And Tiberias says, of course, it wasn't, you
bumbling mess of regurgitated propaganda and bio. There's
no way to control where thousands
of pagers for 5 months, mind you, were
going to be at the time of detonation.
This was the opposite.
Here's David Frum.
The
most precisely targeted
anti terrorist operation in the history of the
world.
I mean, you know, see my point? Why
not just say that it wasn't indiscriminate? You're
lying about that. You have to go so
far over to make yourself look like an
absolute moron.
No, these are just people that are blindly,
and I think desperately, in the interest of
supporting Zionism.
The most targeted in the history of the
world, despite the fact that it wasn't targeted
and killed lots of women and children, half
in fact medical workers and women and children,
half? I mean, it needs to be insulting
to your intelligence, you need to point these
things out.
Here is Elon Levy,
highlighting Petra de Sutter who says, I strongly
condemned the attack because it was a crime,
in every sense of the word, which injured
thousands of people, a brutal escalation of violence.
Silence is not an option. An international investigation
is called for. This is,
what is that, Germany?
I can't read the let me see real
quick.
Get the translation.
Or not.
Oh, enterprises, publics, and
what does that say right there? Let me
do this. There we go. That says oh,
it doesn't even translate. Isn't that is that,
it's not coming up. What's that flag right
there? Let me know in the chat so
I don't miss mispronounce it
Or miss miss misannounce it. But any case,
the point is she's simply calling it out
like she sees it, and I completely agree
with that. And she's got the great check
marks on it's it's a, you know, government
thing. Her point though, what Elon Levy says
is beyond parody.
This guy is such a clown. Like, I
can't wait for a time when this guy
has to revel in his in what he
built for himself here. You know, you're you're
flaming dumpster fire of a con of a
of a propaganda network that you think is
influencing people, but you're getting bots and morons
to support you. The point is I don't
believe even these numbers we see. But either
way, he says beyond parody, the most surgical,
targeted,
precise,
counter terror operation in history
against an enemy army that's been waging a
war of aggression for 11 months. Oh, you
mean, Zionist Israel? No. No. No. Lebanon.
They just want dead Jews. Oh, you couldn't
you couldn't resist. Right? You gotta throw in
the racist point because what else? I mean,
guy, this is a cartoon. Like, somebody really
needs to I mean, people have already done
that. Made, you know, little skits or whatever.
It's just it's so embarrassing. These people think
that they're influencing anybody other than people that
already buy their lies.
It's not indiscriminate.
But you couldn't just say that you have
to make it the most surgical targeted precise
thing we've ever seen in the history of
any civilization anywhere, any universe ever existing. You
know what it sounds like to me? The
same thing Trump does all the time.
The the complete hyperbolic extreme, you know, it's
it's embarrassing.
Here he is again. Because that's what this
guy's job is, obviously. Marco and Jones is
attacking personal device in a manner that harms
1,000 and kills numerous civilians as a terror
attack. Pretty objective. That's pretty basic. Doesn't matter
who does it. Right?
He says it was literal it was what's
funny? Well, anyway, he goes, it was literally
an attack on personal devices
given only to operatives of the terror organization,
which is fundamentally not true.
In many cases, you can prove the exact
opposite of the case. But on top of
that, if you have a 5 month gap
before doing so, there's no way you could
know where those would end up. On top
of that, there are other people in the
military in Hezbollah.
Medical workers, aid workers. That doesn't matter though
because you guys lie about everything. And since
that's the definition of a targeted counter terror
attack.
Counter terror attack? I don't think he understood
what that means. I think he thought he
meant counter terror operation. He's a counter terror
attack.
This guy is such a moron.
Is a terror attack. What he meant what
he what he meant to say was a
counter terror operation.
If you say counter terror attack, you're responding
with terrorism.
I mean, how can they have ever influenced
anybody? These people are jokes. But the bottom
line
is that it's not a counter anything. You're
carrying out a terrorist attack. You're not responding,
you're not defending. This doesn't be you're defending
for the rest of your life in the
way they frame these things. But make sure
we recognize that. I didn't pick up on
that earlier. That's embarrassing.
I hope other people make fun of that.
And I simply said lying as usual and
gave him the the, Wilkerson clip and the
the actual video showing civilians get bombed, which,
oh, I didn't I didn't even I showed
you this. It might be next.
Well, it's it's just a it's a market,
you know, or a little workspace where you
got a woman, you got a child, you
got a man, and it just it just
blows up.
And they all run out. You know, it's
it's everywhere. It's everywhere. These the evidence is
all over the place.
Here, another one from Mark Owen Jones. He
says, why do IDF spokespeople love to brag
about indiscriminate maiming and killing?
And he says, why do some people call
quote indiscriminate
what is literally he just can't resist? The
most discriminant counter terror attack in history.
Again,
this is ridiculous. Impossible to be more targeted
than this. You see, you can't let it
go.
How is it impossible to be more targeted
than this? So you're telling me you couldn't
carry an attack on 1 individual that's a
terrorist suspect and kill him and that wouldn't
be more targeted?
Well, obviously, it would. So you're wrong. And
you know that because all it is is
hyperbolic screaming out of absolute desperation because your
entire world is collapsing. Zionism is falling apart.
The state of Israel is collapsing because of
what you've done, and you're hurting everybody,
including yourselves.
So keep keep being desperate. I mean, there's
one one sliver of of positivity in this
is that these people are probably feeling very
uncomfortable. On top of that, that the world
is seeing what they really are.
And I'm talking about Zionists, of course, as
always, despite all the people that would love
to misrepresent everything people say. But here's Emily
Schrader using doing what they always do. Okay.
So hopefully, it's clear that these things were
indiscriminate.
I mean, corporate media it shouldn't matter that
corporate media said I mean, the point is
that when corporate media says it, it's interesting
because usually they're the ones bolstering the narrative.
So it's being said clearly around the world
that these things were in people's hands that
were random civilians. Or like we said, on
a counter somewhere, somebody picked up. The point
is that they always try to cobble together
these narratives. So there's a lie out there.
Most targeted thing ever, despite Elon calling it
a terror attack like an idiot.
And then they go, woah, but how how
come one of these targeted Hezbollah pagers was
in the hands of this Iranian ambassador?
Okay. Well, that might seem to make sense
if your assumption was that it was only
in Hezbollah hands, or that it was even
only given to them. And as opposed to
just getting it in as many Lebanese hands
as possible, or anybody for that matter, including
Iranian entities.
Now look, let's be clear. Hezbollah is a
political organization, and Lebanon general has an ally
of Iran. And, yes, there is an overlapping
relationship. You wanna call it the strategic partnership
if you will.
It's not the way they frame it as
somehow Iran, like, dictating everything that happens here.
So the point is, it wouldn't be surprising
there would be overlapping communication. The only thing
that makes this into what they want it
to be is the lie that this was
only given to Hezbollah. And then on top
of that, knowing that they weren't even all
military aspects. So the fact I look, I
don't even know the reality of whether this
in fact was what happened in his this
this case, or they just chose to bomb
this guy or attack it with something else.
But nonetheless, she comes and he goes, because
can't we focus on the fact that the
ambassador of Iran
had a Hezbollah pager?
This is not legit this is not a
legitimate regime. It's a terror organization. This is
so they're just trying to scoot the narrative
along. Don't look at the illusion, the lie
that everyone sees as a lie. Let's push
it further and make it about Iran because
that's what they're trying to do. And I
simply said, you guys just cobble together one
lie with another and act like we all
can't see it.
Because the truth is that if we don't
know for sure this was given to only
Hezbollah and it seems to have been provably
not, and it's in the hands of civilians,
well, all you're doing is using the lie
to make it seem as if this guy
is now Hezbollah, even though all of it's
brooded in a complete fabrication.
Now, of course, the point is that you
can see the influence of these people. Right?
So there's an Israeli entity. She I mean,
she is,
what is her current position now? I believe
she was the in regard into the UN
first. Right? What is she,
a journalist, writer,
advice
so I she's definitely acting at behalf like,
she's been doing interviews as an official representative
of Israel. She was basically, let's be clear
that this person is a representative
in many cases of the Israeli agenda.
So he she comes out and goes, why
did they have it? And so did a
lot of Israeli entities. And look at, randomly,
the creator of Libs of TikTok,
of her own accord, of course. Why did
the Iranian ambassador to Lebanon have a Hezbollah
pager? Of course, that's completely organic. Right? She
just woke up and was like, that's a
good question.
Or, and I'm spitballing here, somebody put it
in front of her. I think we can
all acknowledge that that's part of what's going
on today. I just wanna make sure we
recognize that.
And here's where we get get into the
idea of the
eyes being hurt predominantly.
So La la all Ari Ariane says oh,
wait. Did I I'm back one more.
Hold on.
Shoot. I just lose it now? I think
it was right here is where we were.
So bottom line is she goes, this this
is what so many of you are giddy
about?
Because you're seeing this spread around and the
Zionist circles are laughing. The TikToks and all
these different things on their Telegram channels, they're
all posting, laughing, and it's all out in
the conversation, you can see it everywhere.
Gloating about this because they're arguing, oh, it's
all terrorists. Right? But it says, as you
already heard, as Abusita pointed out, children, women,
some of the patients we had to remove
they had to remove both eyes.
Doctor Elias Warak points out. It kills me,
he says. In the past 25 years in
practice, I've never removed as many eyes as
I did yesterday.
And she's simply going, this is what you
guys are cheering about? Guess what Emily chimed
in with? You're damn right.
I don't care if every single Hezbollah terrorist,
and see that's a lie, goes blind. They
are terrorists all hell bent on destroying Israel
and creating war No, that's not even remotely
true. Not even remotely. Even if you think
they're terrorists, that's not actually accurate in any
sense.
The reason all this is happening is because
of the balayders of Israel. There's no question
about that. But the bottom line is that
there were other people hurt. That not everybody
in Hezbollah is a military entity. They don't
care.
These are criminal actions. These are terrorist entities
parading as some kind of democracy.
And the bottom line at the it it
on top of that is that we can
see
that she is praising this, promoting this, laughing
about this. And it doesn't matter that you
can see doctors telling you that it was
children, or that it was women, or that
these weren't pagers given to Hezbollah. It doesn't
matter. Because the narrative will be paraded by
the libs of TikTok people and the rest
that will just continue to say whatever Israel
says. Now Dan Cohen points out that even
Zaka, you know, the supposed aid or support
group, the rescue organization that's all about helping
people,
they made a joke about it too. Because
everyone's doing that right now.
Apparently on Twitter, it's completely okay to to
praise the terror, the violent actions of Israel
and make fun of it. Go look at
how they all got killed. Look at their
eyes are out because of the pagers. But
apparently, in every other context, you're not allowed
to praise a violent event.
Isn't that right in their terms of service,
like in YouTube and Twitter? Yeah, it really
is. But except not when it comes to
Israel because those things mean nothing
when it's Elon or the rest of them,
Twitter or Facebook, they don't care.
Because those things only apply when they want
to stop you from doing things that they
don't agree with. They censor all the time.
And they also allow things to violate explicitly
their own rules when they want to.
And it says, sorry we haven't been here
lately. Ran out of batteries in our pager.
Let it be clear, in no way am
I even suggesting they should be censored. Even
the ones that you probably think should be
in some cases. I am always erring on
the side of absolute free speech. I'm simply
pointing out that they will censor people for
saying from the river to the sea, and
then allow people to praise and gloat about
and
cheer on violent acts against civilians as long
as it's Israel.
Now, Rami Abdul
points out the legal dynamic here. And remember,
he is the chairman of the EuroMed Human
Rights Group.
No international body, and this was at least
as of 18th, has condemned Israel's use of
booby traps,
like pager explosives.
A violation of custody inter of customary international
law, rule 80, which bans traps
linked to protected objects or civilians.
And they violated this, explicitly.
No one cares.
Af,
Afshin Ratzani from the, Going Underground
pot show, under the rules based order, you
can, apparently,
infiltrate supply chains and turn thousands of communication
devices into weapons,
detonate them all across the sovereign country, indiscriminately
causing mass civilian casualties,
remain silent and have the supposed enforcers of
the rules based order not condemned, let alone
act against a blatant act of state terrorism,
Israel's actions in Lebanon once again exposed the
rules order based order as simply rules for
thee and not for me.
There's no way around this. And anybody with
a brain can see that. They just, you
know, people just don't wanna acknowledge it. Now
Robert also points out, as of this was
today, I believe, yeah, in regard to what
happened in the United States, the Security Council,
that was on this exact point,
China
said it was illegal, because it is. Russia
said it was terrorism, because it is. Lebanon,
of course, said it was terrorism, because it
obviously is. The US
said Iran was bad and we support Israel.
Which has what has to do with what?
Well, what it is, is exactly what Israel
wants to come from this. That Iran is
why Lebanon's doing this and we're fighting Iran.
Think how abstract and ridiculous that is when
you just murdered children and civilians with exploding
pagers that have been there for months.
And you get the US to stand up
who screams about liberty and freedom and rights
and law and go, We're on, bad guy.
Where do you stand with the terrorists that
just killed children?
Because that's what they really are, in fact.
Israel, of course, Hamas, Hezbollah, human shield, killing
children, self defense, exactly what you would expect.
And he's not making this up by the
way. He's just summarizing for you and he
goes there, save you time.
Watch it for yourself.
We'll make a point at the end.
I mean, it's embarrassing.
Even about the the West Bank settlements right
now, they're having UN discussions about it. Because
it's both this, the conversation of how it
pertains to Lebanon, the back and forth, but
also because it's impossible to ignore. They're literally
overtaking
I mean, everyone in the conversation knows it's
illegal. They know it's illegal.
And yet they're trying to argue that we
somehow have a right to defend ourselves while
we're pushing people back into what you already
know is illegal.
They're forcing them to acknowledge these things in
real conversation. And so even that conversation, when
you're like, is this legal? Are these West
Bank settlements supposed to be there? What do
they do? They stand up and go, you're
all racist. And how dare you? The UN
is Hamas. It's the same stupid things every
time.
But here we are.
Now Daniel McAdams points out to specifically, speaking
to US conservatives, he says, particularly
Christians, justifying Israel's act of terror as a
targeted attack, he says, are you so morally
de degenerate that you believe turning everyday devices
into literal suicide bombs that can kill at
random
and without warning, anyone in proximity of a
target is somehow just how just how war
works? Or them's just the brakes?
He says, Hi, daddy. Here's your pager. It's
going off. Well, it's the kids' fault. These
are things that you can see online right
now. Driving,
flying with dozens of innocent even if the
target is a Hezbollah,
all these are happening. Is this okay with
you, fellow Christians?
Are you sick? Is it totally justified to
put thousands of totally innocent people at risk,
but at the same time, you are constantly
bleeding about Israel as the only democracy with
the moral most moral military?
I am not going to call you out
by name, he says, but you bloody well
know who you are. You make me sick.
May God have mercy on your soul.
Now, honestly, the point that sticks out to
me
is the idea of of the terrorism aspect
of this or the suicide bomb discussion. Like,
we'll play that clip again in a second.
This is where this stuff comes back to.
And really, even if you wanna act like
these are bad guys, the point is that
you can't
right now we're talking about the idea of
pro proximity
or the idea of of of,
what's the word I'm looking for?
PATA reciprocal, but
symmetry, I guess, is where there's another word
I wanna use there. But the point being,
these are all about international law. Right? So
you're highlighting whether it's it's proportional.
That's what I was looking for. Proportionality,
All these things matter whether or not this
is a legal act in any concept context
in war. But what we're seeing here is
indiscriminate.
I mean, at the very least, you can
see that half the people that were hurt
were not what they're claiming they are. And
then people that support it just go, well,
too bad. They shouldn't have been there.
And then pretend that you're supporting international law
when you're claiming they do it over here.
It's ign it's ignorance. And I know that
people out there who are on their side
of this, maybe conservative or whatever we're talking
about, there's liberals doing it too. I know
you see it, you feel it, you know
it's wrong, but in some cases, you're choosing
not to say anything because you don't wanna
challenge your party. Speak up.
You're only hurting yourself, you're only hurting your
party even, or even people that are in
that, if you continue to pretend this is
not exactly what it is.
Edward Snowden. Now he was covering this as
it was happening, kind of wonder going back
and forth about whether this was,
implanted or whether this was some kind of
reaction. That was the worry at first, that
they were able to, like, electronically cyber attack,
like, create this explosion. That was pretty terrifying.
It does seem that this has been deduced
down to actual implantation. And he says what
Israel has just done is via any method,
reckless. I agree. He says they blew up
countless numbers of people who were driving, meaning
cars out of control, shopping, your children are
in the strollers, standing behind him in the
checkout line, etcetera.
Indistinguishable
from terrorism.
It's amazing people are acting like this is
not what everybody thinks.
Now Kevork also points out that we need
to consider this in the context of the
Beirut explosion.
Really do.
Lebanon's 911. And the reality of what it
actually was that everybody knew, and they just
somehow buried this. Now I'll include this discussion
we had on it on August 10th. Check
out Kevork's work and everybody else that covered
this. Beirut Blast, who benefits? You damn well
know.
Now,
the responses.
Now, actually, let me play it. Since we
just came off the terrorism, I'll play this
twice in fact. I wanna reiterate this point
from the beginning, and I'll play it again
when we get to it next. And this
is the idea
that this is where this stuff comes from.
The bombs, the pagers, the cell the suicide
bomb conversation
comes from Zionism. I think the Zionists have
used it and brought it in fact to
the area. Terrorism as we know it today,
the planting of bombs in marketplaces and so
on and so forth, was in fact introduced
into the Middle East by the Zionists in
the twenties.
But the net result of of Zionist,
terrorism and and violence in the in the
1st 3rd of 20th century has brought forth,
to my mind, the the anomaly,
the horrific and
unacceptable status in the Middle East today of
the state of Israel, which is in fact
an armed garrison state, which now exports more
arms and distributes violence all around the world,
vastly disproportionate to its size. I mean, in
that respect, I think it's a it's it's
a horrible cycle of of violence. But in
it all, I think the Palestinian is the
victim. There's no question about that.
So here is Dave Portnoy
highlighting the New York Post disgusting headline.
Beep beep boom. 2,800
Hezbollah terrorists hit by explosion. No. It's well
more than that, about 4,000 casualties as I
understand it. In fact, that's not I bet
you I think there's even more including the
the
the walkie talkie part after the fact.
Thousands and thousands of casualties, which include injuries.
Beep beep boom.
Right? Think about what they're doing right there
when they when the re the obvious reality
is the killing of innocent people.
It's disgusting.
And they just go Hezbollah fighters because that's
what they were told by Israel. That's journalism
in this country as it pertains to the
corporate and mainstream alternative media. Now Dave says,
I can't wait to watch when this becomes
a spy movie. That's where we are at
this point already? We're not even engaging with
the fact that there are people that are
right now having their eyes removed from their
head because you killed them or you exploded.
I mean, it's so disgusting the kind of
way these responses are. Even if it was
just Hezbollah members, these are still human lives.
The way that these partisan people respond, it
kills me.
This is the craziest counterterrorism plot I've ever
seen.
And Linda Yaccarino
responds with an explosion emoji
and gets about 1,500
likes. Assad m
or a a a a soft MD responds
saying, you're endorsing a terrorist attack that's been
condemned by multiple nations and the international community
broadly,
and gets 5,200,000
likes.
Think about
that. We all see it, guys. The fact
that they're blindly trying to usher you into
this, and they're aiming at specifically the whoever
they can force back into the partisanship, which
is the minority of this country,
it needs to show you the illusion they're
building.
They're trying to force them. 1 by 1,
they're hoping they get just enough to maintain
the illusion. We see you, Linda. We know
what you people are doing.
The world sees you.
Owen Jones, showing you that same picture of
innocent people. He says, leave aside that these
pagers are used by doctors and nurses.
If Hezbollah blew up the phones or pagers
of IDF soldiers, whether or not on duty,
inevitably killing and maiming children and bystanders, which
is exactly what just happened, He denounced this
as an obscene terrorist attack. He's referring to
a a so so called journalist from the
mail.
The, you know, the may the commentator mail
on Sunday. It's, you know, UK. The point
is, he goes, it's hard to think of
a more sophisticated and targeted attack, a terror
group. He says it on 17th. Because he
was there? No. Because he knows? No. But
because he was told by other interests that
are coming from the Israeli agenda. There's no
other way around it.
This is the day At this point, Matt
Miller and the rest are going, well, we
don't know. We we're waiting for information. He
stands up and goes, The most sophisticated targeted
attack of all time!
Because the Elon Levy morons of the world
were saying that.
These are the journalists we're supposed to listen
to, or at least consider. Come on. That's
embarrassing. And the point is that he goes,
Look, this guy, the same guy, would be
screeching about terrorism if the same thing only
targeting IDF members actually happened.
Ben Shapiro, another fake journalist going, looks like
Mossad reached out and touched someone.
Oh, real funny.
Real real humorous. I don't you're gonna go
speak to the children they killed after you
make that joke?
And same point. These are this is it
it says breaking via Reuters. Hundreds of members
of Hezbollah are seriously wounded.
Looks like Mossad reached out and touched someone.
I mean, it just has to make you
sick that these people act like they're in
any way have moral standing, that they're somehow
fighting for good things, or that they think
that they represent democracy, or for you know,
everything they pretend they're pushing out.
Ben Shapiro has shown himself to be one
of the most feckless
in I mean, what what they're doing this
entire time is blindly supporting what everyone can
see at the expense of even his own
dwindling influence. And I don't mean that in
the sense that they don't have a major
platform. I mean, the fact that people would
look at this person and not go, I
either blindly support him because he says what
I like or that you get an objective
audience that interests in your actual fast fact
based reporting.
If you ever thought that was the case,
you need to realize now that he is
completely blind when it comes to this topic.
And what else? That's the kind of way
you should be thinking about these people. If
you could pretend this is not genocide, if
you could pretend that this is somehow something
worthy of joking about, or that these people
were the most targeted
You're not worthy to be in this field.
You are lying for your agenda or are
that stupid. That's what you need to see
about these people today. And I simply said,
now you publicly support targeting civilians?
I said, wow, Ben. Tell us how you
really feel.
Here he is going, Israel just carried out
same thing on 18th, mind you.
Israel just carried out the most pinpoint
anti terrorism operation, you know what Levi was
trying to clumsily say, not terror attack, but
terrorism operation, in history.
I mean, think about this. This is not
some Israeli politician. This is Ben Shapiro in
the United States saying that what we just
saw,
despite the evidence, despite the children and women
and ever that this was the most pinpoint
tarop in history!
Guys, this guy's a he's a cartoon.
That's insulting to your intelligence. And he says,
and the enemies are still complaining,
which suggests that their complaints have nothing to
do with humanitarianism.
Again, you what? So, you know, we'll get
to it that you're racist somehow if you
make these cases. If you point out that
it wasn't, then you're racist. Because that's a
really logical argument. Right?
I said, hey, Ben.
Here well, here's a thought. You know, just
to save you some time. You can just,
in the future, title your show, exactly what
Israel said, episode 200 or whatever number. Hope
that helps.
I genuinely mean that too. Wait. Just tell
me this is what I was told to
say today. Breaking news.
Here he says
this person responds to him who seems to
be somebody who follows him based on their
ongoing conversation. And he's like, why did you
freak out at me? I was just trying
to ask a question. He says, are these
not war crimes?
To Ben,
who highlights
doctor Eli David, who's I don't know who
knows if he's even really doctors. This guy
has been one of the screaming propagandists for
Zionism the moment this started. And all he
says is breaking tens of Hezbollah communication devices,
you know, just selling the narrative the moment
it started based on the fact, you know,
that we know that's not true.
So this guy, along with a lot of
the ones we've highlighted, are just they're given
something and they report it on that moment
when nobody else knows because they are part
of the operation for propaganda.
This guy's one of the worst. He's blocked
me, that's why I can't see his tweet
there. Because I was making him look dumb
with everything he said.
But he goes and he just highlights what
that guy said and says,
Hezbollah's been forced to rename itself Hezza because
they're losing all of its balls.
Like, the fact that he thinks he's even
funny, first of all, you're making a joke
about people, innocent civilians that have got their
bombs exploded around their bodies and this is
what you do?
And this guy, one of his followers says,
Are these not war crimes? And you can
read down here. He goes, why why are
you so upset? I don't wanna ask the
question. The point is, he says no.
A war crime get ready, you're gonna be
educated by Ben Shapiro. A war crime is
when Hezbollah fires 8,000 missiles at civilians, not
what happened, forcing the evacuation of Northern Israel,
which is illegally occupied,
and amazingly and he goes, and
an amazingly awesome military operation
is when you pinpoint
target Hezbollah terrorists by blowing up their pagers.
Okay. So let let's break this down. So
it's not a war crime when you target
civilians
because they did it first.
But then you lie about it and make
it about pinpoint targeting Hamas, which a child
can see that that's not true. But, you
know, your journalism is so strong.
The point ultimately is that if you're gonna
pretend
that either side of what he just laid
out is even remotely true, then you're blinding
yourself to the narrative. But on top of
that, so it's not a crime
to target civilians
because they targeted civilians.
Some good logic there.
So all you're really saying is, if they
do it first, it's not a crime, we
do it back.
Hey, that's just simply not true. It's a
crime no matter what because it's a crime.
But they want you to think like that.
Right? They did it first. They've been doing
it forever. So when we kill children, use
human shields, use chemical warfare, but use disease.
It's all because they started it. Are we
in kindergarten, Ben? Like, maybe you should think
these things through. But at the end of
the day,
that's the best they've got. Same thing he's
doing here.
Simone says, or Simone says, nothing upsets racists
more than Jews doing something clever.
Because that's the best you can do is
boil this down to only about Jews, first
of all, or that we're racist because we
don't like them killing civilians.
It's lazy. It's clumsy. It doesn't even add
up with what's going on. But Asaf says,
just so we're clear, you're cool with implanting
explosives in electronic devices, then detonating them in
a 3,000 in 3,000 distinct areas in a
large metropol,
metropolitan city?
Here's what he says.
As cool as you are with October 7th
okay. So all he just did right there
was go, yes. We are breaking the law,
but we think it's okay because we think
you did first.
That's the conversation, guys. And that's the point
is, that's not the reality. The legal standing
is very clear. Not that there weren't crimes
committed that day. But the bottom line is
what he's highlighting is that we are doing
that. We are targeting civilians and I am
okay with that because you started it.
And he says, Of course! Handsets utilized by
terrorists. You forgot that bit. You should be
a doctor. No. Of course, you're lying and
we all know that, and the point is
that that's all you have.
But just recognize that Ben Shapiro
and this Zionist supporter are pretending that it's
okay because you started it. We are hurting
civilians, but they did it first.
Dave DeCamp
from, from antiwar.com
highlights what Phil here said,
and Rishi believes it's disgusting highlighting what just
happened, and he says, They were all terrorists!
Rashida Tlaib supports Hezbollah! So it could be
that he knows that's not true and he's
lying anyway, which a lot of them do
anyway. He's got a huge following. Or it
could be that he is stupid enough to
blindly follow what Israel said out loud knowing
they've lied all the time. Or maybe a
mix of both. Dave DeCamp says, the 8
year old girl was a terrorist?
Obviously, these things matter.
If you're objective, you can see through this.
It's simple as that. Like like Dave what
Dave Eich was saying in the beginning.
You gotta apply the skepticism equally to everybody.
And if you really do, it's like watching
a cartoon. It becomes very clear.
Here's Nikki Haley speaking of cartoons. It says,
Iran accusing Israel of a terror attack of
Hezbollah is colical.
Like, they just love to frame it like
that. Like, there's just no point there's no
world in which this could ever be possible.
So it's not possible for a state to
carry out a terror attack as a state?
Apparently only when Israel's involved. Right? She said
it's called defense.
Yeah. I I can't even believe they're trying
to make this. So it's defense to carry
out a 5 month long term implantation
terrorism or whatever. Call it what you want.
How is it defense to s
to plan out and execute a long term
plan?
That's not defense. That's an attack. No matter
how you spin this, no matter what happened
before it, the game is they just call
whatever they do defense. And they know we
see through it, but it's desperation. You're lost.
It's over.
Jesus, October 7th was a terrorist attack. No.
It was an act of armed resistance, legally
protected by international law, 14 Unit Convention. And
yes, crimes were committed by Hamas, but far
far more were committed by Israel. And it
says, the daily rockets launched by Hezbollah in
Northern Israel, an illegally occupied territory where illegal
settlers are actively committing violence against people all
the time, displacing
60,000 civilians from their homes. By the way,
most of them are IDF members. Most of
them have official capacity or all of them
do. So that's not even valid point. But
on top of that, it's an illegally occupied
territory.
So they keep pointing at that like they
just don't want you to know that. They
think you don't.
They are bad people. They are actively facilitating
the occupation of illegal territory and supporting
genocide.
But they want you to be the bad
person.
It says terrorists have been holding hostage in
Gaza for a year. That's what you point
at. Not the genocide, though. And guess what?
Those people would've been rescued on 9th 10th
October, should they have accepted either deal on
9th or 10th that they actually offered.
Israelis are calling this out. But Nikki Haley
doesn't care about Israelis. She doesn't care about
Jews. She doesn't care about Christians or Americans.
She cares about Israeli government Zionist agendas.
She goes, let's be clear. They always love
doing that. Iran wrote a textbook on terrorism
and lives it every day. What do they
even mean?
No. They actually didn't. And you're just making
that sound like they did they're they she's
trying to say they wrote the book on
terrorism.
Comparatively,
it's the most obvious false statement in the
world. Look at what they're currently doing. Look
at what the US does all the time.
Look at what Saudi Arabia does. And we're
really gonna make this sound like that makes
sense?
Here is what an American politician said. So
here's Madia Benjamin.
And and just to be clear for some
context, she does go, you know, approach these
people all the time and ask them questions
that make them look stupid or makes them
exposes that they're criminals or that they don't
care about human life. So they obviously don't
like her, I think. But but that's only
because she's exposing that they're bad people. My
point in saying that is that I get
that they're they just kind
of lash out when they're trying to get
a point. But listen to what she says.
So with what you know, and by the
way, this is on 19th. So enough time
for this to have been very clear. Civilians
were hurt, it was not this the discriminate
attack, it was a indiscriminate attack.
And she simply asks,
what do you think about that?
Here's how she responds.
Year old and 11 year old. 20.
Say 8 year old and 11 year
old. They don't think what Israel's doing with
the pagers and have a walkie talkie. They
kill the 8 year old and 11 year
old.
She asked if we have our pagers on
me. Why do you want them to explode?
Is that why you're insinuating?
Yeah. You threatened to die. There's really no
way to misunderstand that.
But one, she's imp she's implying that they're
Hezbollah. Wait, I thought they were wrong. Oh,
wait. I thought they were Hamas. Right? 30
seconds ago, they were all Hamas. Oh, now
they're now they're Hezbollah.
Maybe you should get your narrative straight because
they're not the same thing despite the clumsy
overlap. These people are ridiculous.
But overall,
you could even take that as a threat.
But this is an American politician speaking to
her own constituency
and saying, do you have your pager on
you?
I mean, that's gotta be up it it
needs to show you what these people really
are. I mean, I believe it was just
me, but even the way these people look
screams there's something wrong.
But that's terrifying to me. And I said
these people are absolute monsters.
They truly feel that they can act with
impunity.
Let's prove them wrong. 2 party illusion. And
the bottom line is that they continue to
do this.
And, I mean, since October 7th, highlight that
they're no longer even bound by the illusion
that they're somehow trying to win political seats,
which I think speaks to the illusion that
we all know exists, hopefully, around voting, but
the point is that they don't care. These
are the people that are supposed to vote
for them. What happened to the time when
politicians would tell you what they want you
to hear because they want everyone's vote? Not
today. Probably because they only need one vote,
and you know who I'm talking about.
Senator John Fennemin, a good example of that,
who I don't even think is posting these
things quite frankly. He says, for the second
day in a row, I absolutely endorse weaponizing
Hezbollah's tools of terror against themselves.
Not what happened.
And Hezbollah's not a terror organization, and there
are innocent people even within that, and these
people don't care.
You I mean, look, you can pretend that
you agree with this or you can actually
agree with it, but don't pretend that these
things or these people support human rights or
support international law, or support anything they pretend
they do. And I say, thank you for
admitting that you support terrorism and the killing
of children. We already knew that though.
Congressman Brad Sherman.
He says, let's be clear. They they always
think that gives them some kind of gravitas,
and they go, oh, it's ridiculous.
Like the words wouldn't be clear in their
own right. It is strategic, in in in
its strategic attack Alright. This is on 17th.
A US politician,
when there's when there's really no way he
could possibly know what actually happened other than
having people in Israel tell him what they
said happened,
he decides to post it, vomit it out
on Twitter. In a strategic attack on Hezbollah,
Israel used innovative methods to carry out precise
built nope. He's already lying.
Maximizing the elimination of terrorists. Nope. While may
may minimizing harm to civilians. Well, at least
he acknowledges harm to civilians, but that's also
not true. There's no way they could've minimized
anything. This was an indiscriminate attack with a
5 month gap between when it was put
out and when they executed it.
And he says, Iran's ambassador must explain why
he had a Hezbollah built it. Oh, look
at that. Don't you wonder who's seeding these
thoughts into their minds? It's very clear to
me.
What's the other point? He's simply saying using
diplomats to carry out terror. It's all assumption.
Saying, given that Iran's long history of using
diplomats to carry out terror oh, are you
talking about Israel? Maybe you misspoke there. Pretty
sure Israel is the one that's been caught
doing that over and over and over and
over and over. This includes the plot to
assassinate Saudi ambassador. What about the assassinations of
nuclear scientist Iran? And I mean, like the
civilian nuclear program that the IAEA and is
and even the US today have admitted are
not in the it's all the same story.
The point is they lie about everything and
what you're highlighting there is pretty much, as
usual, accuse them of that which you are
guilty.
It says, in war, it's impossible to fully
prevent harm to civilians. So you end with
the point of kind of like, wait, this
is pinpoint targeted, but should you acknowledge or
understand that they did and it wasn't true,
even then, it's okay
too. They always do that. They give you
both sides.
So no matter what you understand, all of
it makes sense and it's all legal and
it's all okay, so shut up and go
away.
No. You did not minimize harm to civilians.
And then you go on to say that
no one can not harm civilians. Yeah, you
actually can. Especially if what you're actually doing
is going after the people you claim you
are. Not bombing them or 5 month gaps
in in the middle of civilian locations.
Because which is what they keep doing. Oh,
we bombed a market full of 400 people
because we thought he might been oh, it
turned out he wasn't there.
Funny how no one's in prison for that,
even though it's one even Wolf Blitzer couldn't
swallow that.
Now it goes on to say, of course,
all the same kind of narratives, some impacted
by this operation may be civilians. Why? Human
shields.
Do you think he knows that? Do you
think he's making that up? Do you think
he's just saying that because he's been paid
to? You can make your own mind up,
but that's not true. We can see the
videos of innocent people being killed. But here's
a US politician
blatantly making things up in the interest of
defending a terror act by a foreign country.
That should make you pretty uncomfortable if you're
being objective about this. And then Zachary Foster
highlights the reality.
Even Horetz wrote, Israeli army uses Palestinian civilians
to inspect potential booby trapped tunnels in Gaza.
Or the clip I could play for the
100000th time of every other human rights group
telling you, the naval procedure, human shields from
Israel, over and over. There's been 7 times
since this started on October 7th, just this
part of it, where they've been caught using
human shields. But Brad Sherman wants you to
believe that they
I mean, it is this is pretty terrifying
to see US politicians blindly doing this at
the expense of Americans.
Here's mister Fine.
Representative Randy Fine, who again, make sure you
understand, is a he's proud of it. It's
pinned right to the top of his Peter
feed Twitter feed. Donald Trump on True Social
said, Randy Fine is a MAGA Warrior.
He will stand up to anybody. And he
goes, I'm honored.
Yeah. This is the guy that's been promoting
and, cheering on, attacking even the American citizen
that was just killed. He said, good. Kill
them more kill more of them. They're all
terrorists. That was an American citizen and he
didn't care.
Here's this same post. Here's what you're all
giddy about?
Innocent children and women having their eyes taken
out? And he says, yep. Eyes away.
I just don't understand how this can exist
in a conversation where we're pretending America First
is even on the table.
Where are all the people that are saying
that when you're looking at somebody telling you,
we don't care about Americans if Israel's involved?
Terrifying.
Bassem Youssef, getting into the point of where
this overlaps, the most important part of this
conversation.
The influence infill infiltration of tech around the
world.
Bassam Yousef points out, and suddenly,
my phone, our security system, my kids' tablets
are time bombs that detonate at the whims
of 1 country.
You win, Israel.
Not a single politician or late night talk
show talks about this.
None of that worth the news?
Nothing? Nothing funny that can come out of
it? The whole country is truly a hostage.
The whole world is.
It's pretty scary.
And you know, I mean, what's funny is
everyone's talking about World War 3 and all
these different things, and no one in that
very conversation can point at how terrifying that
really was. Now these the hypotheticals are pretty
scary. But they're hypotheticals.
You just literally witnessed something that is truly
terrifying, that has implications that are far reaching,
and none of those same people are going,
that's terrifying.
Why? Because I think that large conversation has
been completely shifted to focus away from that
at all costs.
Now Daniel McAdams highlights what George Galloway says,
which is what if what a Lebanese electronic
device
is currently above your city?
Right? Your window seat.
On board a commercial airliner.
Bringing a Boeing 747 down on your family.
Your neighbors.
On you.
Would you be laughing then?
He's talking about all the people out there
screaming that this is something to be jeered
about, laughed about, praised.
There were people in different locations and cars
and play things that ended up hurting other
people around them.
What if it happens again? They happen twice.
What if it isn't a play? What if
it's meant to be? Now think about these
things, and it's amazing that anybody can deny
the validity of these claims. And Daniel McAdams
says people don't understand
the massive scale of this Israeli terrorist attack.
Suddenly, nothing and no one is safe anywhere.
Now I'm not gonna go as far as
to try to, you know, that I it's
I can't live like that. Even if that's
the reality, it's it's impossible to jump at
every shadow like that because you'll never the
point the point is you could take it
to that extent. You could realize, and which
is what we'll get into in the US
side of this, that this could possibly mean
that. That the phone in your hand right
now could be one of those things.
Daniel McAdams
highlighting
Ward Bebo,
who says, guess what?
Israel produced the pagers.
Now it's important to see this. The reason
I bring this up in the beginning, especially
when we get into the point of of
what Freddie Pontone adds to it.
I wanted this to be an evolution of
understanding.
Right? See, just just by the way, I
very well could've
jumped this out right in the front, probably
got a lot more attention to views for
but see, that's not my objective here today.
My objective ever is not about maximizing view.
Even though there's a level of reaching more
people, I think we're suppressed anyway. My point
is to for those that actually know we're
here and actually care to follow and enter
and and and entertain the possibilities and think
about the source material, look for themselves,
it's about trying to bring along the evolution
of understanding. And now the point here is
that we can see not only was Israel
involved, not only did they put the explosives
in there and have a 5 month gap,
but they actually built these things. And that
overlaps with Pontone's research, which by the way
was sort of why I was jumping through
that pretty quickly because I wanted to bring
this back up now in the context of
what he already found out. So that was
his pre previous research I wanted to include.
Israel this is mail online. Israel did not
tamper with Hezbollah pagers. They built them from
scratch using shell companies
that had been making and shipping the devices
to Lebanon for years in preparation for the
attack. Think about the long term planning
of taking over shell companies or franchises, however
you look at it,
and then keeping this going for years in
order to keep the and then after this
long period of time, building these from scratch
and facilitating this, and then a 5 month
and then executing this.
You know as well as I that these
things are all over the world.
They're they are praising that. They're promoting the
idea of the Israeli startup, Unit A200,
Silicon Valley, everything.
We'll get into how in-depth this is in
the United States.
He says, now it appears that the Israelis
set up a front company across Europe, or
companies, to manufacture the pagers themselves, embedding small
amounts of this explosive inside, ready to detonate
when they should want it to. That could
mean there are other explosives still around.
It really could. And I'm really not trying
to fearmonger. I think this is a valid
concern. Daniel adds
that and then he highlights what he said
that could be still around. He says, I
keep saying this is a serious issue. No
one knows how many killer electronic items are
floating around in the global marketplace because this
has been going on for a long time.
That is why it is a colossal lie
to call this the most targeted top ever.
It is the exact opposite. A massive crisis
and a door to global terrorism. The Rubicon
is crossed.
I really think it's to the level of
that concern that we're talking about, or at
the very least, the possibility that these things
could be literally everywhere. I mean, let's not
let's be clear about the reality that Israel's
government has been openly stating over the years
that they don't care about America, and they
don't care about their own people. But that
they've that they can manipulate the United States
whenever they want to. They can pit the
parties against themselves. Netanyahu, in multiple cases, has
been caught on video saying these things.
And we consider the Samson option.
Very provable, a stated policy of if and
when they should be under the risk of
annihilation, that they would execute a nuclear attack,
I guess, on the world or whoever they're
fighting, anyway that would hurt the world regardless.
So I wouldn't put it past them from
putting these things everywhere.
And then having that bill the ability to
do it to anyone anywhere whenever they should
want to. That terrifies me. And you know
as well as I that it's very possible
that we're looking at here.
Now we're gonna overlap this with these points
about the US government, with the the claims
of the the overfocus on China. Because there
is a reason to be word there, but
if you're so concerned about that, why would
this not matter to you?
Which is what we see in the largely
Republican conversation. Now Matthew Keyes has an important
part to this. He says, as we hear
about the pagers in Lebanon that injured more
than 27100 people today, this on 17th,
a reminder
that one of the things that came out
of the Snowden leaks is that the NSA
intercepts packages
en route to customers
to install
malware
and surveillance devices.
Alright? So that means that even if you
order from somebody else, they'll intercept it on
the way and do something like that. Now
we're either talking about surveillance and malware,
but he goes, these piqued, quote, these pagers
were likely modified, he's quoting the article,
in some way to cause these types of
explosions. Now this is obviously early. The point
is we now know the explosive part of
it. And it goes, the size and strength
of the explosion indicates that it was not
just the battery.
It then goes, the exploding pager's attack is
a turning point in electronic and psychological
warfare,
opening up a new and frightening front.
Your governments are supporting all of this or
at the very least too scared or compromised
to do anything about it.
Then he says, and he's pointing back to
something before saying, in a sizzle reel showcasing
its pagers and other wireless products,
Gold Apollo, which is one of the overlapping
parts to this, says it manufactures everything in
Taiwan. After thousands of pagers exploded in Lebanon
on Tuesday, a Gold Apollo executive claimed the
company outsourced those pagers to a company in
Europe.
That's where we're getting to.
And he says here, the New York Times
claims the European company, BAC Consulting, that produced
Lebanon's exploding pagers was a shell company
set up by Israeli intelligence.
The pagers have been manufactured and shipped for
at least 2 years.
This is absolutely terrifying to me.
I forgot to grab this.
Because of the obvious implications
that everybody seems to be ignoring that doesn't
want to implicate Israel in what's going on.
Maybe it won't maybe there's no way back
machine. Let's see. There we go.
Or rather archive
as that opens.
There we
go.
It's right there. Israeli government did not tamper
with the Hezbollah phones that exploded. Defense and
intelligence officials say wrong one.
I don't know. I should I forgot to
open this earlier. The point is that you
could read through this for yourself.
Over the summer, shipments of large pages level
increase with 1,000 arriving the country as blood
fusses and lives about intelligence.
As below, they were a defensive measure, but
in Israel, intelligence officers refer to the pages
buttons.
Anyway, I don't I it just we're already
way past our time. Shoot. I know you
guys also and you have a re you
have every right to make fun of me
for how much I try to make them
shorter and then just never seem to happen.
Especially when I did that the other day
and went for 5 hours because I gave
up on that throughout the middle. Anyway, I'll
include this for you. Read through it for
yourself. The bottom line is we can see
clearly,
oops, wrong
button,
that the the NSA aspect of this, it
could play a role. And I only argue
that in the sense that we know that
there's an overlap of the intelligence apparatus as
Whitney's covered very extensively.
And so we need to wonder what role
that may play coming into other countries or
specifically in the United States. And the fact
that this is very clearly tied back to
Israeli intelligence, which we already know.
Now Craig Murray adds this point. And this
is where it gets worrisome for me in
a US perspective.
Because I've seen this as well. And this
is what always you've seen me point this
out the entire time, whether it's the reactive
propaganda or the fact that the Israeli Zionist
element.
Well, I scream the quiet part out loud
because they wanna show you how powerful they
are. Or it's it's pettiness. It's hubris. It's
small.
In this case, exposing the larger reality
because they wanna gloat about how much power
they have. It says, extraordinary.
The number of Zionist shills who have gloatingly
tweeted to him, Craig Murray, about how much
Israeli tech is in Western consumer devices.
He says they're too stupid to grasp that
industry buyers are urgently researching alternative suppliers
this very moment. Now,
I would argue the larger worry is, like,
this agenda's been the trap has already been
set.
So whether or not they get new buyers,
the point is, too late, it's already seeded
throughout your electronics.
And they're gloating about it. Now, it could
just be that they wanna scare you,
but that's terrifying to me. And it says
plus, even the European Commission are now on
to the day on to it as a
danger to the UEU and consumer security.
Now here's Brian Mast.
You know, mister Zionist Brian Mast who served
from the IDF but somehow pretends he's an
American politician. He says, this is a war
this is warfare of the 21st century. He
goes, this is why we need to stop
relying on China for our tech. Make things
in America.
He's literally highlighting the point.
This is what China would do. Really? So
you're not worried about the Israeli in which
is wildly infiltrated throughout our government our entire
country? There are Israeli startups using this is
the next point we're gonna get into.
Everywhere.
911 call centers. All sorts of overlapping
tech points in this country. And the only
thing I could point out is worry about
China when you can see the problem right
in front of you.
You know why? Because this guy is not
in the interest of Americans.
And APAC tracker goes, is this you?
Cracking a joke about it.
He goes, this is what I call sending
a message.
Those are civilians being killed, Brian.
He doesn't care, guys. Because it's Israel's enemies,
so it's in his enemy
too. And including if that's you, mind you,
whether you're American or not. Did you see
him scream about the American they killed in
Israel? Did you see him condemn the violence?
No.
Bottom line, these people
are actively pointing at the problem, but only
when it pertains to China.
I think that's pretty terrifying from American politicians.
He also pointed this out. Leaked blueprint of
the next Hezbollah communications device.
They're making jokes about this. Really trying to
downplay the concern
as it pertains to you, I think.
Now let's get into the main point here.
Great article from Whitney.
This is an original article for The Last
American Vagabond from May 12, 2023.
The Prince and the Spy.
As it says, a TLAB investigation
has found that Erik Prince,
the man behind the Blackwater mercenary group now
called Academy,
recently teamed up, this is in 2023, with
an Israeli spy, creating a front company
with her to help Israeli defense technology providers
exploit loopholes and sell their products to the
American military.
That's how crazy this gets. Now you've already
seen this, and I've talked about it in
the past, or I have more than once.
If you haven't seen this, this is probably
gonna blow your mind. So her name is,
Latal Leshem.
Now she
was the operations officer in the IDF of
the besieged Gaza Strip and later becoming a
major as a position that she continues to
hold to this date, at least at the
time of this article. According to her LinkedIn,
she served in the Israeli military intelligence from
2,005 to 2,011, and more specifically,
served in its signals intelligence unit,
Unit 82100. That's important.
She later attended IDC
Herzliya, an Israeli university deeply tied to its
military intelligence apparatus.
There, she met Amir,
El Shai,
and the 2 would cocreate the company,
at the time was called Reporti,
later called Carbine 911.
Today, it's known simply as Carbine.
This is one example
of something that has proliferated throughout this country
and the world, quite frankly, in alarming ways.
Carbine was originally founded as reportee in 2014
by Leshem, each, each,
Elich, Elichai and Alex Dezenghoff.
Leshem and Elichai are unit a 300 veterans.
And, again, this is think of it like
the NSA. Right? This is a a an
intelligence apparatus that is used by the Israeli
government, and they are outspoken, which we'll get
into in a second, about whether they're current
or not, sort of like the CIA, that
they're acting in the interest of of Israel's
interest wherever they are in the world. They've
said this publicly in this about every interview,
but if you say it, you're somehow racist.
Now it's saying,
while Dezigoff
previously worked for the Israeli prime minister's office,
so all coming from Israel intelligence and government,
before it was revealed that Jeffrey Epstein had
poured at least $1,000,000
into the company at the behest of his
close associate, Ehud Barak, Carbine's board of directors,
which Barak chaired, included the former commander of
the unit 82100,
Pinchas,
Butris,
as well as Epstein associate turned venture capitalist,
Nicole Junkerman.
You realize that co that company still work
is existing today and still does this, despite
Epstein, despite Israeli government overlap, despite intelligence, despite
this very story.
In the wake of the Epstein scandal, of
course, Boutrous, Barack, and Junkerman, among others, were
removed from the board because there was an
interest in hiding the real point, I think,
and were largely replaced with veterans and former
heads of American intelligence and law enforcement agencies.
Leshem had left the company in 2017, but
has continued to own shares in the company.
Now despite that shift, there's still obvious connection
overlap with unit a200 members and Israel itself.
Now she says, Carbine is a next generation
911
platform or an NG 911.
And the explicit goal of NG 911
is for a 911 systems nationwide,
all of them nationwide, all of the 911
call centers, to become interconnected.
It is currently active throughout the United States.
Its main target market
being the United States, guys.
Its software has been criticized
due to quote, security privacy concerns
about the amount of information it harvests from
smartphones
that call a 9 one one call center
running Carbine software.
For instance, Carbine's smartphone app extracts the following
information from the phones on which it's installed.
Quote, device location,
video live stream from the smartphone to the
call center, call message, text messages, in two
way chat windows. Any data from a user's
phone, if they have a Carbine app and
ISINET.
And any information that comes over the data
link which Carbine opens in case the caller's
voice link drops out.
That's, you know, think of it like the
autentics aspect of Twitter. Like, there's so many
aspects of Israeli intelligence scooping up American in
information, and your government doesn't care.
Neither does Elon. Neither does
Blackwater and Erik Prince. Now it says, in
addition to Carbine,
in addition, Carbine stores all data on past
calls and events
in order to, quote, enable decision mark makers
and accurately analyze the past and present behavior
of their callers. Does that seem like that
makes sense for their objective? React accordingly and,
in time,
predict future patterns. That's why. That's the precrime
aspect. That Bill Barr and Trump's administration were
the ones spearheading.
And now that we're seeing all these supposed
assassination attempts, let's ask where that's really going.
I'm willing to bet it leads to some
justification for more gun control and more pre
crime, which will be cheered on by the
very people who are fighting it right now.
Prediction, but we'll see what happens.
Now it says, as a result, Carbine, along
with other Israeli intelligence connected companies,
seeking to dominate the American public safety market,
which is a stated objective,
has the potential to facilitate controversial predictive policing,
I e pre crime policies. In addition to
Carbine, Leshem also works for Black Cube.
Black Cube again, Black Cube, if you remember,
was the group that was hired by
Weinstein
to literally harass and surveil his victims.
It's populated with all supposed former Mossad members,
in big quotes. Black Cube was specifically outed
as an Israeli intelligence front organization
in a 2019 article published by,
Kalkalis Tech. That same article, which I showed
you earlier, I'll show you next,
contains
the stunning revelation that many Israeli companies, including
Black Cube, have been founded as fronts for
Israeli intelligence operations all the way since 2012.
It states that since 2012,
cyber related and intelligence projects that were previously
carried out in house
in the Israeli military and Israeli's main intelligence
arms are transferred to companies that in some
cases were built for the exact purpose that
they're using.
So like Carbine 911, for example.
The also the article also adds, in some
cases,
managers of development projects in the Israeli military
and intelligence arms were encouraged
to form their own companies, which then took
over the military and or intelligence project.
This is the point.
I mean, it's so obvious that we need
to recognize this problem.
Here's the article. The one I'll show you.
Feel free to read through this. It's exactly
what you know, Unit 8200 Israeli intelligence. Israeli
is siphoning cyber related activities from its national
defense apparatus
to privately held companies.
It's as clear as day. Since 2012, cyber
related intelligence projects that were previously carried out
in house in the Israeli military, and their
main intelligence arms are now transferred to companies
that in some cases were built for that
exact purpose.
It says, Leshem, again, the one of the
founders and now stockholders of Carbine, has also
worked for another company tied to Barak, who
Ihoo Barak, former prime minister of Israel, that
has been described as worse than the NSO
group that we've talked about in the past,
which produced the notorious
Pegasus software.
Called the company she's involved with called Toka,
its top executives,
like Carbine, by the way, are largely veterans
of Israeli unit 82100. It's like it's all
of these. And that's the stated purpose of
it. Where Leshem also served, our former or
former commanders of their military cyber operations.
The company is directly partnered with Israeli Ministry
of Defense and other Israeli intelligence security agencies
since its founding. And the company only sells
its products to countries that are considered
allies of Israel. It's per and they realize
that's we can see what they're doing to
the United States, we can see what they're
doing to so called allies all around the
world.
It says it purports to be able to
hack
not just smartphones,
but any device with Internet connectivity,
such as doorbell cameras,
other quote smart devices.
That's so what they're literally telling you is
that the company
that they have founded,
that is overlapped with Carbine because of the
background, because of the people that founded it,
because of the Indian Internet connection, are openly
telling you that this company is able to
hack anything. Now, of course, they could be
lying,
but why in the world do we want
that in any connection to something that is
tied to you?
Your government, I don't think, cares
or is not even capable of defending you
from this anymore.
And it says, as will be noted later
in this article, Leshem herself
has noted that Toka has an open relationship
with the CIA.
Let's not forget, CIA Mossad,
that's JFK assassination.
After being involved with the series of Israeli
intelligence fronts and her enduring ties to Israeli
military intelligence
through her, quote, reserve duty activities,
Lusham was courted by a surprising figure,
Eric Prince,
war profiteer and founder of the controversial mercenary
outfit, Blackwater, now Academy, and seemingly about to
become parts of Trump's administration. They're talking about
privatizing the Defense Department, horrifying things in this
context. Now there's, there's ways you could think
there are what they're trying to do in
general is take the ideas from a libertarian
perspective that might actually have some kind of
positive outcome and pretend that's what they're doing
when all they're really doing is more authoritarian
control, more
fascist public private partnership concepts. They're driving you
into the same structure under the guise of
what you're asking for. It is Prospera, Honduras,
Peter Thiel's company, it's everywhere in the world.
We will be doing more on that. We'll
talk about it with our PowerStream conversation tomorrow.
Now over it finishes by a couple more
points saying,
according to Leshem's website,
a year and a half after she started
working for Erik Prince,
she and Prince, quote, joined forces to found
a company called Comframe,
a company that takes the best of Israeli
defense technology,
the provide the providers therein,
and helps them penetrate, their word, the American
market by bridging prevalent gaps.
Now, of course, everyone wants to pretend
best allies, strategic partnership, most moral, all these
lies.
You would you go, there's no problem there,
because we're allies.
But how many examples do you truly need?
Of Israel stealing it American nuclear technology and
potentially overlapping that with secret sales and offers
to China. Or the idea of the infiltration
in a countless ways to the bombing of
the US liberty or the spy devices on
the White House during Trump's administration. Or the
obvious influence and occupation of our ongoing political
structure.
Has nothing to do with race or religion.
It's about politics.
Despite how these terms can be used in
other conversations from racist people.
People that wanna misrepresent that as about racist
or Jews or Israelis. It's not. It's about
an organization, whether Zionist or otherwise, or a
political entity like Israel's government
influencing policy. The fact that we can even
debate about that right now blows my mind.
They're telling you what they're doing.
Leshem
also says Comframe was assisted by her, quote,
premier integrator
and business development platform
for deploying advanced military special operations, public safety,
and HLS solutions,
specifically in the United States,
and a wide network of partnerships, both government
and civilian.
This really does blow my mind. Like, this
is right. This is from 2023. Now think
of this in the context of what we
just saw.
Now the article
that referenced above notes that Comframe, quote, is
focused on recognizing needs
in the US defense industry
and matching them to possible solutions
from Israeli companies.
That
this is a funneling process.
It says, however, the article notes, quote, to
meet the demands of American security needs, one
must have an American entity.
Leshem, of course, is then quoted as saying,
Rahm,
Zachary of of Tom Carr had been living
in Phoenix for 15 years. He but he
can't do that,
sell to to American military because he's not
a citizen, but we can.
So what they're saying what she says right
here. In other words, Per Leshom,
Comframe,
utilizes Erik Prince,
and presumably Burgess, who's referenced above, to sell
Israeli defense technology and products
directly to the to the American military.
That in any other context would otherwise not
happen because of the obvious national security concerns
around buying
foreign made products for sensitive defense and military
operations. But simply because Erik Prince is part
of the company, well, nobody bats an eye.
Can you think about how terrifying that can
be, with what we just saw happen and
the possible implications of where these devices may
be? We have literal Israeli startup intelligence companies
populated throughout this country, producing all sorts of
other things other than cell phones, utilize controlling
our 9 one one call centers, And possibly
having access to your phone in that way.
These things should be concerning.
It says, Comframe is specifically targeting special operations.
She also suggests that aside from the US
military,
another intended market for the company is NATO.
She told Jerusalem Post that the US, quote,
controls
70% of the NATO's defense industry. So, by
default, through the US control, they're controlling 70%
of the of the NATO aspects and what
they're using and their technology.
Guys, this is a terrifying view if you
realize what this could mean about the influence,
about the control, the infiltration
of just electronics
or even just in defense technology or intelligence
throughout the world?
How far has this actually gone? How long
has this been happening?
Now finishing actually finishing. It says, Confrain is
a very suspect company. It is highly, highly
secretive,
targets sensitive American military agencies with foreign technology,
that's its stated purpose, and its known employees
are apparent spooks
and intelligence linked mercenaries.
Not only that, but the history of Israeli
espionage in the United States, which is long,
from Jonathan Pollard to Promise, the software, to
Converse and beyond, so Converse we're discussing,
Shows a concerted effort to target the American
military and security agencies with
bugged or, quote, backdoor technology.
So as always,
Israel or, Russiagate was actually Israelgate. The China
hacking phone conversation was, even if real, was
probably just to hide the bigger problem of
what this really highlights.
Maybe there was an overlapping interest when Israel
started saying, Woah, you gotta stop China because
we're doing it. I mean, who knows? You
can think about it all you want, but
let's stick to the facts when you actually
break things down. Hypothesizing an important part of
this.
But what we know for sure
is the very government that just executed a
massive attack using infiltrated devices
clearly has the ability to do that
everywhere throughout this country.
What happens if tomorrow,
they they US government
goes afoul of Israel? What happens then?
Certainly possible, isn't it?
In addition to the the the above, Prince
has also recently engaged in efforts to market
a very suspect smartphone
to MAGA Republicans
as being unhackable and unsurvailable.
The reality is, like, everybody that's written up
on it is, like, that's not even remotely
true. It might as well be an iPhone
with different small differences. The point is, it's
not even remotely unhackable or unsurvailable. If you
actually want something like that,
since we're bringing it up
let's see if I can get it pop
up real quick here.
Well, there's the actual link to that, but
I wrote about this. Are we getting a
show about this?
Dang it. It's not coming up. I'll try
and include it afterward. But here's the actual
link to the above phone in general.
If you wanna in in the show notes
of the show, you'll have there's a link
if you wanna, you know, grab one and
you get a discount and so on. I
I really believe in this company. It's a
it's a it's a freedom phone that is
literally d Google that is absolutely disconnected from
all this all the things that his pretend
smartphone or secret phone or whatever it is,
privacy phone, all the things that his still
has. The point is this is actually disconnected
from all these things.
But the the point here is that he's
selling this specifically to MAG Republicans.
Why is that?
He says that phone was, quote, designed in
Israel,
which is true, and the company that produces
it is called Unplugged.
According to the reports, Unplugged's day to day
technology operations are run by Aaron Karpen, a
former employee of Communitech, the Israeli startup that
gave rise to how in now infamous hacker
for hire firm NSO Group.
Karpin, like Leshiam, is also a veteran of
Unit 8200. So now you've got a Unit
8200 intelligent entity that is building a phone
that's aimed at MAGA Republicans?
Maybe you should think twice about that when
you're watching them explode phones in Lebanon. Just
a thought.
Prince debuted Unplugged's phone on Steve Bannon's war
room, because of course he did. But both
Prince and Bannon have controversial relationships with exiled
Chinese billionaire, Guai Weng Gu, and known as
Miles Guo, we've talked about in the past.
I think and Matt Aero's read a couple
articles about that for TLab that you can
check out. That prince would help market this
phone,
specifically aimed at MAGA Republicans,
is disturbing. Giving that his associate, Leshem,
and other unit 82 100 Israeli intelligence veterans
and operatives
have played a major role in developing that
infrastructure for the US war on domestic terror,
which is mainly targeted at the political right
and has already utilized mass surveillance through smartphones
and other technologies
to justify arrests, including pre crime arrests.
What do you think they used to track
down people from January 6th? The point is,
guys, this is an overlap that you need
to highlight. And if you're too afraid to
point this out because of the TeamSport politics,
then you're in a bad position. Recognize that
that's not healthy for you and stand up
and act
with principle.
Call out people that you know to be
lying. And call out people that you know
to be ignoring very obvious threats to your
safety.
Now
this is the article came from. I'll include
that as well so you can read that,
or what the point she made about what
they're stating this. And it was it's a
very public conversation about Israel praising the fact
that they're using these startups to change the
word tech industry, and all of them are
directly tied back to intelligence. And all of
them, at many different points, have stated that
what they do is in the interest of
Israel.
Now here's Freddie Pontone, and this is the
evolution of his research up to today, saying,
the CEO of the Shell company
and this is the Shell company that we
talked to the globe, I'm blanking on the
term now. It's, gold or the one that
was saying that, no. No. It was outsourced.
It wasn't us. So this turns out to
be the outs the shell company
called Norta Global
in Bulgaria.
It says in Bulgaria, Rinson Jose was a
mem or, gosh. Sorry. There's supposed to be
a period there. Rinson Jose was a member
of Founders Nation,
a platform to help entrepreneurs find or become
a startup
cofounder
in Israel. So you know what that sounds
like to me? That sounds like a way
of trying to hide even the fact that
you're a startup unit. Why? Because other countries
are catching on.
So now you need to find somebody else
to be the front man for your unit
a 200 startup company for Israel. But now
we know this is what this is.
Israel and CEO of Fastlane Israel was a
member of the founders' nation. It says, m
Mamrem Alumni Association
is a state created defense entity and was
created to satisfy perceived
needs within the IDF, including support for cyber
intelligence operations.
The founders,
the the Founders Nation website is down, but
we can still see the link where the
association is listed. Why is it down? Because
they're being exposed right now. That's my opinion.
Same goes for the Norwegian entrepreneur,
Rinson Jose, all of which are involved with
this Founders Nation conversation and the company, which
is shell
that is a shell of the larger company
that's being used to hide the fact that
Israel is producing these.
And lastly, it says the Israeli Defense Corps
Center of Computing and Information Systems, known by
its by its Hebrew acronym,
and that's the point he's making or sorry.
Just jumped.
MAMRAM
is part of IDF C41
and Cyber Directory. Is that 1 or an
I? Looks like an I maybe. C4i?
Yeah. C4i.
Ma Mamram is responsible for the full world
of IDF computing software algorithms and cyber defense
and is based on advanced computing abilities. The
fruit of its products can be felt by
the military's EDGE users on land and sea
and air. That's what they're saying. The point
is, this company
is through I mean, this is explicitly intelligence
from Israel. This is the company that built
these things, that put them out there. These
are the same overlapping companies that are in
the United States
doing the same things, but from a different
guys.
That should be scary for people.
He says this is a quote from a
oops. Let's keep doing that. From the,
a colonel in the IDF saying, in the
past 2 decades, as cyber arena became a
new combat arena,
that's and that and this was hold on.
Grab it in a second. Its role grew
even more central since every part of the
IDF has an electronic component.
Now remember the time we're talking about here.
So this,
I thought it had in there.
I'm I'm remembering wrong. I thought there was
a date included with the quote, but the
point was that ultimately we know it's well,
it says that the past 2 decades, but
I I thought it was I thought it
said 2,012. The point was that 2012
was when this whole kind of push is
arguably really kicking off. But But either way,
we're talking 2 decades, so it's pretty much
right there. The point is that this is
when this began.
So you can pretend they're 2 separate things.
You can pretend that the start up idea
and the new tech world is all about
helping the planet,
despite the fact that at the exact same
moment they're saying, that same cyber arena
is a new combat arena and we need
that because the IDF is tech okay.
If you think for one second they did
not build out their technological influence, which we're
already proving today, for the very purpose of
their military influence around the world, or rather
intelligence, at the expense of everybody they pretend
they're allies with, or enemies,
you just don't wanna see it. Because my
point is not just that that looks that
way, but they have said this.
If you listen to their interviews, specifically in
Israeli media. Because as always, I keep pointing
out, they love to praise how they're using
other countries. They do Netanyahu's been caught countless
times
act making fun of how easy it is
to manipulate the US government.
Now he adds as well the that just
her her, LinkedIn page you can read for
yourself. And it's saying it's the 1st technological
unit
of the IDF.
Now Eric Prince is on a video here.
This is on 19th.
Simply adding other dynamic to this saying, Venezuelans
and lovers of freedom worldwide have come together
and already donated
$1,000,000 to the Yaa Cassie Venezuela movement.
Like, it just what's interesting, let's not forget
the point for Venezuela, which is that the
one of the, the members of the government
that the US wanted in place had written
a letter to Netanyahu in 2018
asking him to facilitate regime change in Israel,
or in in in Venezuela.
Very public.
Now we see all the I mean, this
has been going on for a long time.
They were the ones the US pretended won.
Everybody else seems we're acknowledging that this was
not only a legitimate
election, but, I mean, there was like over
800 international observers, countries that the US are
allies with. Some of the people that were
in the opposition said that this was completely
up and up. But of course, just like
Bolivia and everywhere else in Syria, they just
lie because they want control. Like, we're seeing
everywhere you look. I mean, let's not pretend
that we're gonna think that they wouldn't lie
about this election,
but at the same time would support a
genocide.
Right? They're lying to you about what just
happened in Lebanon, they're lying about the starvation
of children, lying about the bombing of innocent
people. But yeah, I'm sure they're being honest
about the Venezuelan election, right? Despite lying about
everyone before that. Like the only people that
I think go along with these, like the
Musk crowd Pied Piper nonsense, is because they're
either blinded by the following or they don't
care.
The point is, here he is, trying to
act like we're gonna save Venezuela.
This is a building problem and these people
are I'm seeing the outlines of what this
is about to become with Trump's administration.
He says, now it's time for the business
community to step up and contribute to this
critical cause. Right? Give money to this mercenary
to help overthrow Venezuela.
Your support will help bring freedom and hope
back to Venezuela
and bring the Maduro Cartel to justice.
These people pretending like they're fighting for freedom,
these fake libertarians and freedom fighters are using
your wanting of freedom and good things to
help
and to blind you to the reality that
they're literally overthrowing people that are, in some
ways, actually helping their people. But as long
as they do not help the US agenda,
it doesn't matter what they are. They'll support
genocide as long as they go along with
what the US wants in some cases, or
arguably more compromised in that way. But let's
say any other government.
Groups that Saudi Arabia. As long as you
get something, we don't care that you're terrorists.
As long as you work with us, hey,
Sudan. You wanna partner with Israel? We'll look
overlook everything.
These people are the bad people of the
world, and we need to be honest about
that. Now here's Israel or, Whitney's article about
Israel in the same context from 2019 from
Unlimited Hangout.
How the CIA, Mossad, and the Epstein network
are exploiting mass shootings to create an Orwellian
nightmare.
Here's one from 2020
from your unlimited hangout. Meet the IDF linked
cybersecurity group, quote, protecting
US hospitals pro bono. You see how this
keeps happening? This was COVID, before it was
cyber school shooting. Every time they use these
events to further infiltrate
everything, specifically the tech industry. Or in this
case, our health industry.
Here from 2023.
CIA and Mossad linked surveillance systems quietly being
stalled throughout the United States.
Now, when you piece all this together, you
tell me that's not alarming. To realize that
this entity that's committing genocide, that doesn't care
about the government, doesn't care about you, doesn't
even care about its own people, that just
literally carried out the most obvious terror attack
terror attack in Lebanon,
killing innocent civilians,
and yet you can see that they're controlling
911 call centers, our medical system, the survey
their surveillance apparatus throughout the United States.
These things are not made up. You can
look these things up directly from Israeli discussions.
And we're not supposed to be worried about
that?
Or,
coming up on the election,
the very open conversation that even The Guardian
broke down of what I call the Israeli
in the Israeli election interference and psychological operation
industrial complex.
This guy was exposed by by Mondawai it
was no. It was not it was,
shoot. I'm forgetting them other articles. They're a
bunch of big mainstream platforms from multiple countries
jointly investigated this.
This guy is an Israeli asset. He works
for the Israeli government, now it's been exposed.
And what he was doing was being paid
to manipulate elections,
and and hack,
and use bots to manipulate online.
All of this is really happening, and this
guy gloated
about influencing
27 out of 29
presidential elections he was involved with. And he
mentions the United States, mind you.
This is the real picture of what's going
on. And all the partisanship, including the left,
by the way, are ignoring it. Even the
ones that point out the genocide don't wanna
admit that our elections are not what they
appear to be. Not in the context with
Israel anyway. Met Richard Medhurst points out something
bigger in the context of how long this
has been happening.
He says the deadliest terrorist attack in history
against British subjects
was carried out by Zionists.
Never forget that fact.
Right? Manichean,
was it
but, Bayan I forget how to say his
name all of a sudden. But one of
the previous prime ministers or the original one
of the first prime ministers of Israel,
b e g I n. How what is
it? It it Behan?
I don't know why I'm forgetting that right
now. But anyway, responsible for the King David
Hotel bombing,
even became the Israeli prime minister because Israeli
society rewards violence.
I think that's by desire. I think it's
been, you know, same way the US government
traditions Americans just to to reward war. Right?
But he says in 2006, the Israelis
unveiled a plaque at the site of the
King David Hotel to commemorate that bury attack.
A bit like if Al Qaeda would unveil
a commemorative plaque at the site of the
Twin Towers. It's exactly what we're talking about.
Netanyahu attended the celebration of terrorism.
The plaque even
blamed the victims for not evacuating fast enough,
the same way Israelis think you deserve to
die for leaving quickly enough on the on
the roof after a roof attack. It was
so offensive, the British government officially protested and
the Israelis changed the text. But only in
English,
not in Hebrew. That's my point from before.
It's in your face.
They want that to be the case because
it's important for the people that they support,
or that support them, to see we're we
have that control over these people. Israel, Europe,
and the United States, they're all powerful. Look,
we control them. We can influence them. That's
not my opinion. They praise that all the
time. That's why Netanyahu's been caught on video
more than once making that statement. We just
pretend it's not there.
Then he finishes by saying, and then we
give these people weapons and intelligence.
How humiliating.
And then there's this clip again. The point
is, this is where it started.
Many of the scientists have used it and
brought it, in fact, to the area. Terrorism
as we know it today, the planting of
bombs in marketplaces and so on and so
forth, was in fact introduced into the Middle
East by the Zionists in the twenties.
But the net result of of Zionist,
terrorism and and violence in the in the
1st 3rd of 20th century has brought forth,
to my mind, the the anomaly, the
horrific and unacceptable status in the Middle East
today of the state of Israel, which is
in fact an armed garrison state,
which now exports more arms and distributes violence
all around the world,
vastly disproportionate to its size. I mean, in
that respect, I think it's a it's it's
a horrible cycle of of violence. But in
it all, I think the Palestinian is the
victim. There's no question about that.
So
in basically, I'm just I'm gonna skip some
of this at the end, which whether it's
tomorrow or the day after that, I will
be getting into.
But ultimately, to finish, I wanna include a
few points about the other aspects of this.
And then I was gonna go into a
larger point about, you know, what Israel's doing
still to like, the showing you what they
really are in the context of, like, the
moment to moment actions of the last few
days, like I usually try to do. But,
also, in the context of what we just
discussed.
The infiltration of Israeli in the tech or
intelligence in in many different forms,
It also applies to other countries too. This
is very interesting to me. This is posted
on September 11th, mind you, 2024.
Israeli
pleads guilty
to shipping US made avionics
to Russia,
which by the way was violating sanctions. How
ridiculous is that?
It says the US justice department says this
person sent aircraft tech, some of it while
with missile applications worth $2,000,000
to Russian customers. You know, this is exactly
what happens everywhere. Same with China I mentioned,
that's happened where they're James Corbett's covered this,
just Israel just kinda facilitating that process to
China, or the idea of using this in
any other context. Stealing stealing nuclear technology.
These people abuse that relationship at every turn
and your compromised politicians either don't know or
don't care or are aren't able to do
something about it. The reality, though, is that
if you're if the Israelis
in this context are using this pipeline, how
do we know what else is influenced?
Right? They're using how is the NSA overlap?
How do we know they're not simply part
of that same point? How do we know
we're not gonna see Russian planes start falling
out of the sky? We need to worry
about these kind of things because it's happened
before.
Or
this is something that Casey Wright pointed out,
which is pretty crazy to me. I guess
his name now is back to bread and
circus.
So lord Bebo points this out, and this
does appear to be a real story. At
at the very least, that this guy is
claiming this from
Russia.
And I guess this guy is, like, the
the, leader of the Chechnya Republic in Russia.
Here's a an image of him on a
Cybertruck with a gun.
Apparently,
Elon Musk has remotely disabled his truck.
Obviously, you know why this connects.
So he writes, how many accounts who retweeted
this or liked it have fearmongered about Joe
Biden doing the exact same thing?
Right? I mean, we know this from from
the leak from WikiLeaks, the conversation of, what's
his name? I'm blanking. Michael
dang it. I just for some reason, I
just can't draw these things today. Usually, I'm
good about bringing them up. What's the his
name? Give me the name in the chat.
The, you know, the example of somebody who
clearly,
arguably, I think the evidence suggests, was killed
using the hijacking of remote vehicles.
Right? This this is what Ricky Lee's exposed.
There is this element. As well as the
fact that the whole Vault 7 conversation, it
showed that the the US government, and I
guarantee is real, has the ability to hack
or do these kind of things and leave
the fingerprints of somebody else,
specifically Iran.
But so the idea though is that that
should be terrifying. Because if you and this
is not just the Cybertruck, mind you. But
at the very least, realize that if Elon
Musk is willing to cross that line,
publicly
Hastings. Thank you. Michael Hastings.
I mean, that has to show you where
this is going, guys. Why? Because and that's
that's Michael Wright's point here, or, Casey Wright's
point here.
Why would you praise it here but be
scared of it over there? Because partisan politics.
Oh, it's the good AI. Oh, it's the
good technocracy. Right? You it's blinding people that
don't care because partisan teams are politics. The
problem here is that this is where we're
going. That you can just be like, I
disagree with your opinion, even if it is
something that might everyone want terrorists, whatever. Whatever
you wanna claim. Well, at what point does
it become, oh, you're anti Semite. Oh, you
said the wrong thing about Israel. Oh, you
whatever it is.
Now you're censored. Now you're shut down. Now
your car doesn't work. Now you can't access
the Internet. That's where this is going.
And his point is that everyone's basically cheering
this on.
Oh, yeah. Bad guy. Get him.
It should be scary to you to see
where this is going, and the very people
that should be the most resistant to this
and were during the COVID 19 discussion, when
all these same things were coming up in
different contexts, are being the most pacified because
of the power structure that I see developing.
It's the same thing I think happened during
COVID 19. They're being pacified by the element
of Trump. In this case now, Musk and
Thiel and Vance and everything else he's building.
I hope I'm wrong.
Now to finish in general, I just wanna
highlight that I will go through this more
because I'm sure this will continue into the
next couple days, sadly enough, which is that
ultimately, Israel has just continued to bombard civilian
areas in Lebanon. Now this is being reported
broadly, by the way. Bombing
the capital of Beirut,
which is very pot densely populated civilians or
kill this one says killing, commander. But, oh,
I think it's this one actually. Yeah. IDF
confirms air strikes on southern Beirut suburb. And
there's videos. I mean, there's it's an oh,
it's a suburb full of civilians. They are
openly attacking civilian locations, and my point is
they're just going, that's because they started it.
They bombed us first.' But they didn't though.
They didn't start it. You're bombing
illegal occupied areas and military targets, best as
I can tell. And here you are praising
the bombing of civilians.
And they go, well, we killed a commander.
And it's the same game we're seeing. Didn't
you already hear what they said? Oh, it's
because they're using human shields.
They are setting this narrative up. That's what
they're doing right here. Herzog. I repeat again
and again, we did not want this war.
But we are entitled to the most basic
rights of nature.
Self defense, they're saying. Security. Tranquility.
And that's why you carry out a terrorist
attack and kill civilians? Like, I don't think
people are gonna feel that makes sense.
Bring our hostages back. Well, you're the one
not doing that, and your own people keep
saying that. So this is aimed at the
western audiences because they're desperate.
It says last night we saw the precise,
impressive actions of that's all they're trying to
do, make it seem like we did a
good thing.
And all they ultimately argue is they're using
human shields. That's what it says right here.
The hostages back to their families displaced oh,
wait. Is that the right?
Hold on. I'm I'm trying to just rush
through this. There was a
yeah. Right. It's right here. IDF says, the
IDF is currently striking Hezbollah targets in Lebanon
to degrade Hezbollah's terrorist capabilities.
Right. So that which means, by the way,
inherently,
people that aren't in the military wing, just
Hezbollah is a broad term. Right? That's like
saying I mean, it it in this case,
we can prove that there are elements of
this that are not there are, as they
said, doctors, nurses, hamburgers.
But it says, 4 decades and here begins
the new phase of the war. Just like
we saw in Gaza, they're just gonna lazily
move it over to Lebanon. 4 decades, Hezbollah
has weaponized civilian homes, dug tunnels beneath them,
and used civilian shields. Well, there you go.
It's worked for a year. Right? So now
you could bomb anywhere in Lebanon because you
said there's tunnels and stuff. Who cares about
proving anything?
All you gotta do is make some video
highlighting an old tunnel that you showed 30
days ago and make it look like Lebanon.
Everyone's gonna pretend it makes sense. Having turned
them into a war zone, or human shields
for that matter. You mean despite what Owen
Jones showed you and we've all seen that
even Horetz has pointed out that you keep
using human shields? So does that mean they
can bomb anywhere in Tel Aviv? By that
logic, that would make sense. Right? But no.
That's not how that works. And it seems
like only one entity is doing that.
The idea of it's operating to bring security
to Northern Israel. You mean the illegally occupied
territory? Like, guys, they have lost the plot.
Anybody that has any understanding of anything in
regarding the international law or this situation should
be laughing at how dumb this is, but
no one seems to want to stop them.
This point was them bringing oh, this was
simply saying
the point is that over this is from
BBC. Over 83 of all the attacks conducted
between Israel and Lebanon since October 7th have
been made by Israel.
That's from July. But it's true then, it's
true now. That's from, you know, not that
I'm BBC verified. It's about the facts that
are there, for whatever reason, they're highlighting that
fact. And it is the case. They're just
making it out to be that they're under
attack all the time when Israel's the one
that is going after Lebanon. Roberts made this
clear. And you got these other propagandists for
Israel coming out and going, how quickly we
forget about the 12 Druze, not Israeli, they're
Syrian Druze population. They were explicit about that.
They drove Netanyahu out. They said, you're not
part of this. It's an illegally occupied territory
that Trump gave Israel when he doesn't have
that right.
Now this case, you remember because Robert covered
it and the video undeniably
shows the reality that what they did was
launch a
rocket from the,
Iron Dome. Now, whether it was an accident
or it was deliberate, that rocket, which went
in the sky and then fell back down,
which we've shown many times
And this one's actually from a previous example,
but it's happened And the one we showed
you was at Zwel, where it flies up
and falls back down, and all of the
evidence. I mean, across the board. I think
this is the one.
In any case, this is the one that
rush him out. The evidence is undeniable.
They bombed,
either by accident or by design, a bunch
of children playing soccer, and then just blamed
it on Lebanon. And the reason they rushed
away from it so fast is because it
was obvious. Sort of like the flower massacre
that they just dropped, run from, ran from.
And that's the same reason, oh, how fast
we forgot. Well, because you stopped talking about
it because the evidence show you murdered those
children and just thought you could use it
and it didn't work. Same thing, the Persian
Jewess.
These 12 Druze Israeli children, they're not Israeli.
The only people anywhere in the world saying
that is the Netanyahu government.
But that's all they have. They're failing. They're
losing.
Now lastly, I was gonna go through these
just rapidly. I'll play this later. It's a
great clip from Ben Swan. It says, an
Israeli Hebrew language newspaper is highlighting that the
IDF general has openly argued that turning Gaza
into a place where no human being can
exist is necessary.
That's new.
But let's keep pretending it's all about Hamas.
Okay?
Because if you are, you're a bad person.
And you know that and you're lying to
yourself because you don't care about human life.
Or at the very least, you think those
people there aren't worthy of it.
If you went to 1 funeral for a
day
a day if you went to 1 funeral
a day for the children killed in Palestine,
it would take 27
years
to attend all the funerals.
Here is why we can tell you that.
Here is this has been released by the
Ministry of Health from Gaza. Now despite all
the stupid claims from Israeli propagandists, both the
military
and the intelligence aspect of the Israeli government
have openly said that the hit the Gaza
Ministry is both accurate and reliable. That's not
my claims. That's directly from the Israeli government.
Now I'll just grab one of them since
I brought it up.
And the point here is just are accurate.
That's from the Israeli intelligence apparatus.
Reason I'm saying that is because this is
from the Israeli health ministry that the Israeli
government told you was accurate. And they are
saying, here are 649
pages
with the ID, the gender, the age, the
name of every Palestinian killed.
So let's pretend that they can prove they're
all Hamas members. At some point, very rapidly
now, this is gonna be flushed out and
they but the point is they won't care.
Because they're already hiding every lie. They're already
hiding every genocidal act. And your governments don't
care. But the facts are there.
And the reality is the first 14 pages.
The first 14 pages of this document are
1 year old children.
Really let that sink in for a second.
Fourteen pages of 4 of 1 year old
children but we're gonna pretend this is all
pinpoint targeting.
Tell us again, Ben Shapiro, about how they
pinpoint target everybody.
Makes me sick.
And then another representation a visual representation of
the 355
bullets, which has been proven, both by human
group human rights groups on the ground, by
the UN investigation,
the fact that the Israeli occupation army fired
355
bullets
at that little girl by herself in a
car.
Hindry job.
Here's a clip, by the way, that, Marshall
shared with me as well. Here's Owen Jones
sharing the same of the Israeli military throwing
off a dying Palestinian man off the roof.
Didn't we hear that so long before? Isn't
that what they keep screaming about Iran and
about everybody else? They throw them off the
roofs. Well, here you go. Every accusation
is an admission.
This is real, guys. This is I Owen
Jones says, ISIS throwing people from the roofs
was long regarded as the trademark of why
they're depraved. Well, here you go. Throwing a
blindfolded Palestinian from a roof.
That's the reality of what we're dealing with
and your governments don't care. Shooting a journalist,
which we're seeing there, yet again.
The idea of these doctors, which I was
gonna play you yet another clip from another
doctor that's speaking up, telling you what's happening.
This person giving a testimony about how she
changed her mind around Israel because of all
the facts. The American that they killed, and
ongoing, which I'll show you next time, as
how Matt Miller and the rest of them
keep pretending like we won't investigate, we'll trust
what Israel says. About an American.
Kind of America first. Right?
Or this ambassador. I'll just play this one
short. I'll play you this one. Here's Here's
what you're getting from these people. These people
are a joke. And Iran's fingerprints are all
over all of the bad things that are
going on in this region. And Iran needs
to end its support for these proxies. They
need to do it now. And we need
to all work for de escalation of this
conflict that is Unless Israel attacks, then we
defend that and say nobody else can respond.
Right? Or that everything we can clearly prove
is tied right back to Iran. Right? Or
the Houthis. Or
Hezbollah.
Or Hamas for that matter. But let's remember,
Israel has funded Hamas up until October 7th.
But you show me how you can prove
all of the actions that are explicitly bound
to Israel are somehow the fault of Hamas.
Why? Because they're always defending themselves, apparently. This
person is either that stupid or that compromised.
But here's what he says when about the
obvious culprit. Of paramount importance right now. What
about Israel's fingerprints all over the region? I
I don't know what you what you're talking
about. Do you? Oh, yeah. Good good job,
American politician.
Really well put.
Unbelievable. Now this is a good win at
the end of the day or at least
a positive step. If you haven't heard, the
United Nations Assembly
has adopted a Palestinian resolution calling on Israel
to end its occupation
by an overwhelming majority. So right there you
need to recognize that the vast majority of
the world is very aware of what's going
on. They don't want you to see that,
though. Sam Husseini highlights who was for and
who was against, who abstained. You know, abstention,
which is supposed to be a part of
the voting process that we got stolen from
us in this country.
And he also highlights that many are trying
to dismiss this as nonbinding. He says Craig
Mokayber points out the reality that it very
clearly is despite the I mean, they lie
about everything, guys. That's the reality.
Orson Ostrovsky, the pretend international human rights lawyer,
says the ambassador is absolutely right. This is
Danny Dannon saying,
as we said after this week, it is
evident beyond doubt, get ready to laugh, we
told you this was coming,
that simply put,
the UN has become the diplomatic arm of
Hamas. You know, the UN. Right? The multifaceted
entity of different countries all representing themselves and
the body itself, all these moving parts. They're
all just Hamas now. You never realize that
the United States is part of the United
Nations or you don't have to think that
one through, or it doesn't matter though because
Hamas everywhere, which I said down here.
Everyone I don't like is Hamas. A child's
book, a guide to online political discussion.
How embarrassing. Like, these you know, you realize
that they're kind of a laughingstock in the
circle of the UN right now? If you
watch these people's responses, if you look at
their faces while Israel's speaking, it's like the
child is speaking.
No. Here we go. We're all gonna be
called racist. We're all gonna be called Israel
haters now. Get re and and it's not
even addressing the topic of the day.
All they do is grandstand for the little
clips they put out when nobody other than
their followers support. And the reality is, if
you're gonna pretend that just the UN is
Hamas, which I've been saying almost as a
joke,
you're a joke.
These people are committing genocide and pretending that
the only entity in some cases that's saying
anything about it is somehow Hamas. Even though
you fund Hamas, you absolute morons.
Now,
here he is standing up or rather or
Rami pointing out when Dannon was standing up
and claiming that their action through the gen
the UN,
the the actual resolution that was calling for
the legal
conclusion of the process,
he said, was simply
diplomatic
terrorism.
That's how stupid this thing is. And her
point is simply that look. Or his point
simply, even when we do the thing through
the right channel, which, you know, whatever it
is, BDS or whatever you're claiming, you still
call it terrorism.
Now it's diplomatic terrorism because you forced everyone
to acknowledge that you're I mean, it's just
so embarrassing. And then lastly, Hany Naftali, thank
you to the nations who stood up for
the for Israel at the UN. Well, let's
review who those nations are.
The the clear bunching of all the leading
democratic and liberty focused people in the world.
Right? The United States, Hungary, Paraguay, Fiji, Czech
Republic, Argentina,
Malawi,
Micronesia,
Nauru, Palu,
Papua New Guinea, Tonga, Telugu. Yeah. All the
leading countries in the world, clearly.
Or if you have any understanding of the
world, pretty much the people that Israel is
still able to influence and literally everybody else
is like, yeah. You're crazy. We're done. Or
even the ones that support them are recognizing
that they're on the way out.
And so they're siding with history.
I mean, think about how embarrassing it is
for these people to go, thank you for
all I mean, I'm not diminishing these countries
at all. What I'm trying to say is
that in the context of the world and
the global picture of the UN, that's pretty
damn embarrassing. But
you gotta pretend it's everything because that's what
they do. Now we're gonna end with this
great clip coming from the UN discussion
about the world of double standards.
So I'll leave you there.
Obviously, kind of, as always, longer than I
wanted today.
I'll get there one day. We'll see. We'll
break it down in shorter. I again, I
was actually putting more thought recently into how
I could do this same version with a
longer discussion, but then have some, like, one
topic a day off I might have. I
wanna jump in and do something. I can
find a way to do that. You know,
like and and I mean, there's plenty of
ways to do that. But I mean, like,
in a way that's it works for this
dynamic where I can do, like, a quick
like, call it something else. Like, not the
daily wrap up or even somebody suggesting I
should just call it the wrap the the
tea lab wrap up, which I get why
I will get back to my routine schedule
as hopefully soon enough. But then I can
have, like, more of a focus point and
call it something new. So, hey, if you
got thoughts on what I could call that,
some kinda new focus point for what we're
doing, reach out. Let me know. But thank
you for your support, guys. I I appreciate
everyone that continues to tune in and support
what we're doing and supports the Internet the,
the,
Independent Media Alliance and everybody else involved and
all the great people there with all the
multifaceted opinions. You know, some of which think
voting mad. It's very multifaceted.
And that's the whole point. You won't find
that in the mainstream alternative media.
So thank you for supporting people that truly,
truly, whether they take the right action or
not, want to do the right thing. And
the reason I say it like that is
because we all make mistakes.
People can get misled,
Clearly, we can get manipulated by foreign countries.
Excuse me.
But the bottom line is it's about your
integrity and principles.
The people in this group, the people who
I, you know, collected in the TLAB Organization,
The reason that we're they're here is because,
we on the side of integrity and principle
and what we believe in.
Clearly, in the context of the context of
this election where everyone's telling you that only
adults will end up with it. We're and
we're bucking that whole thing because it's obviously
childish to say that giving up in a
system and voting for somebody you don't like
is ultimately what you're supposed to do. Pretty
sad.
Right? And again, I've There's plenty of discussion
we've had about what other options there truly
are, and we've got into that in that
show that you saw in the beginning and
we'll get into it plenty more. But thank
you for those that support
honest,
independent journalism.
Thank you for being here. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Who will aim at you and say
welcome to the world of double standards.
And talking about double standards,
just a while ago,
we heard the representative
of the occupying Israeli forces
bashing you all
as he does with you and his predecessors,
perform a show,
and teaching us and lecturing us about humanity
and morality.
Totally disconnected
from reality.
Even today,
he couldn't bring any
justification
nor speak about the topic we're discussing,
the illegal settlements.
He could not address
the resolution
and trying to show that the world started
only
on October 7th,
neglecting the fact of history.
Well,
if he considers this assembly a circus, guess
what?
I consider him a clown performing
in this place,
always bringing his preps,
trying to produce a show,
failing to make us laugh,
deceiving us from reality.
That's what they try to do, but they
failed dramatically.
So when I asked him if he thinks
this place is a circus,
why are you performing in it? Why are
you still a member in it?
Ladies and gentlemen, it's time for you to
show action and not words.
Nearly a year will pass and the massacres
and genocide in Gaza
and the West Bank is continuing.
The inability
of the international community, especially the security council
to stop these atrocities
and reach a ceasefire
and the silence of many of you is
what allowed the killing of tens of 1,000
injuring 100 of 1,000,
the displacement of almost 2,000,000,
the spread of famine,
and diseases.
So today, do some justice for those innocent
and vote in favor of this resolution,
which would be a message from the world
to the occupying forces
and who support them blindly.
Say
enough is enough,
and it's time to act.
Libya reaffirms its position that it won't define
resistance
against occupation
as terrorism.
And who from your countries didn't gain their
independence
without resistance,
especially when the doors of peaceful solutions are
completely shut down.
Libya affirms its position that the only peaceful
solution to this 7 decades of aggression and
occupation
is by recognizing the Palestinians right to defend
themselves
and resist occupation
and the right of self determination
and having an independent state with Jerusalem, its
capital.
In conclusion,
it's time now for all to comply and
respect the outcome of the ICJ.
This court, which we all know
has established or was established to help in
ensuring peace and justice
where international law should prevail
over the use of force.
Therefore, we call on you all to vote
in favor
of this resolution to pave the road for
peace.
History will remember
those countries
who which have taken a principle,
a moral,
a legal, or humane stance,
and it will also remember those who had
their humanity in deep coma
and were aware and deliberately participated
in this live broadcasted atrocity,
especially
the 21st century holocaust,
the holocaust of Gaza.
Voting in favor of this resolution today
is a vote for peace, and it's a
vote for justice.
I thank you.