Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Sunday, September 15, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
Really felt it was necessary today to start
with that song and across my path today.
That just was I I don't know. I
mean, I I know exactly
why it was so powerful for me when
I watched it today.
But I thought I just wanted to share
that feeling with you because there's something that
I expressed today that really struck me. That
there's something about this work
that is so monumentally important for the very
interest of fighting for that,
of fighting through all the terrible things in
the world to achieve a point in which
people can genuinely be happy without having to
appeal to some power or another.
But the point is that inherent within this
work of going through all of that, there's
a piece of me
of who I am as a person that
is state that is just slowly taken from
me. And I don't mean that in any
way other than it's just the nature of
what this is. And it doesn't all it's
it's also the point that that I something
that I just won't let happen.
But it's it's interesting that there's a part
of me as a person that is that
that it it's weird. If if you would've
known me as a younger person before I
got in involved in all of the work
that I do today, you would have never
guessed that I would be a person that
would be day by day talking about the
kind of things that I talk about. It
makes sense if you understand why I'm doing
it.
But I thought that was such a powerful,
wonderful song that I wanted to play. I'm
not familiar with the guy. I'd so I've
seen his accounts. I'm gonna look into more
of his music. But there's just something about
that, you know? Thankful for sunshine, thankful for
happiness, thankful for pain, thankful for simply having
the, you know I'm telling you, just It's
It makes me emotional just even thinking about
that because it's such a It's a powerful
thing that we can choose
to be happy. We can choose to find
the powerful moments and the the important, you
know, the the the goodness in all of
the terrible things around us and recognize that
that what we're all doing and quite frankly,
I think when you really try to look
like that, you recognize that there's more goodness
than there is bad in any moment in
this world.
But the problem is that the powerful people
of the world that are usually more able
to to, you know, dictate how you see
things and through what lens you look at
the world
tend to have much more influence over the
way we see things.
And I just want you to think about
that because there's a lot of things we'll
talk about today that are that are tough,
that are that are hard to to
accept.
But the whole point of what we do,
and that's the reason I brought this up
today, is to fight for those things, to
fight for the not just the freedom to
make those choices, but the real the world
in which people do not have to feel
bound by things that are outside of, you
know, there just live your life
without the constraints and the shackles of government
and influence and possession and everything else we
talk about. Now if you want those things,
that's up to you to decide. Right? And
for your anyway, I philosophically
go off forever, but I just I thought
that was an important moment to start with.
One, just because I thought it was powerful
for me, but hopefully it gave you a
little bit of you know,
remembered what we're actually fighting for today.
Now today, we're gonna go over a lot
of a lot of stuff.
And again oh, and I I also want
to start with the idea of as of
now, we should be switched over to a
new server. That's why I didn't I mean,
it was pretty clear what was happening before,
but I didn't wanna just kinda lay that
out in case that might help whoever wants
to try to suppress what we're doing. But
now we are
we are effectively away to our new server
at this point. And so I want you
guys to let me know if you're having
any issues with the website. Are you are
you able to access it? And, you know,
the usual game that gets played with this
or not game, just the dynamic the situation
is that when you do something like this,
a lot of times, it takes a minute
to populate.
A lot of times that can be dragged
down by the very systems we're fighting against.
But the idea is that if you're out
there and you're unable to access the site
right now, as irritating as it is to
me when I get told this, try clearing
your cache and seeing if that fixes the
problem. I've already heard that it has for
a lot of people. It's not, again, it's
not really a problem. It's just simply that
your computer has stored an older version that
takes you to the wrong location. And eventually,
it would fix itself. But if you just
do that, you'll I would argue you'll be
able to access it right now. And if
you're not, let me know because that then
I need to look into why not. But
my point is that I feel like we're
gonna start to be able to have less
restricted access to the website, should be moving
faster and, you know, positive things in that
direction as well away from these control structures
1 by 1, step by step. That's what
we're trying to accomplish. But let me know.
And, also, it should hopefully,
guaranteed, free up the time that that was
taking from me, which was a lot on
top of everything else. Only that's only to
say that hopefully that will allow me to
get back to my usual routine with all
the stuff that's going on. But please let
me know how the website's working for you
speed wise. Anything you see that's different, reach
out to us. Let us know.
And I think that was it that I
wanted to open with in general, but we're
gonna talk about a lot of stuff today.
We're gonna really go through a large portion
of of foreign policy to start like I
told you I would. West Bank, Gaza, a
Venezuelan update about, very interesting story about an
at least an alleged attempted assassination on Maduro
which,
I mean, certainly could be made up by
Maduro but it's, I mean, it's like it's
just saying it's like it's Wednesday over there
for Venezuela from US foreign policy. It's just
it's constant
assassination attempts, regime change attempts, destabilization.
I mean, if you if there's anything you
would've take at face value and you never
should in this context, but if anything was
gonna be, it would be the US government
just tried to kill Maduro for the 50
1000th time or, you know, any the leader
of Venezuela. We're gonna go over what that
shows, the overlaps I find interesting.
And and, we're gonna start with a focal
point which I think is very important today.
And, again, I'm very aware of all of
the
of again, in regard of distraction, a very
of all the breaking stories of gunshots in
an area near Trump that's overtaking the conversation.
And I think you should ask why that's
happening right now. We're gonna touch on an
important story in regard to breaking news about
Israel, a WAPO investigation, which doesn't mean we
suddenly trust WAPO. But there, whatever reason, showing
you this data that that Israel lied, surprise,
surprise, about shooting that American activist just like
Abu Shrin Abu Akleh and many other discussions
of Americans being murdered by Israel and your
government ignoring that. US is liberty entirely, in
fact, or any number of examples. Core,
Corey, a blank all of a sudden, gosh,
just so many murdered people from Israel. It's
hard to keep their name straight. Unfortunately, it
bothers me. The activist that was killed by
the bulldozer, I'm just blanking on her other
name at the moment. But it's it's just
constant how this happens, and your government will
never address this, which is obvious. That should
be very clear to you why that matters.
And And all these people screaming about patriotism
and why we should care seem to not
care when it has to do with Israel.
Only that group I'm talking about, not everybody
in every political section aligns with the the
point is there's a lot of people that
don't wanna see it if it has to
do with Israel. That's important to consider. We're
gonna talk about UNRWA and the, follow ups
discussion about another assassination of a bunch of
teachers and and aid workers that they've outright
lied about yet again. Not really a news
story sadly enough, but your government and the
rest of the corporate media don't care to
follow-up on it, so we'll do that for
you. The Hannibal directive is being followed up
on by Israeli media, and it's exactly what
we've all been telling you. And it shouldn't
you shouldn't even need that to prove it
to you at this point. It's undeniable what
happened. The point is that it's now becoming
even more important in Israeli media, and the
Israeli population is saying, this is unacceptable. We
need answers. We need people's, you know, political
heads as it were. And it's a very
important story. Guess where you're not hearing that?
Matt Miller, Blinken, Biden, Trump, RFK, Kamala, any
any of them out there telling you that
they're fighting for freedom in American interest, ignoring
the American citizen, the aid workers, the any
number of things that are happening at the
hands of the very people they're arming, funding,
supporting blindly.
That's disgusting in any context.
And then again, we'll talk about West Bank
and Gaza and what the ongoing reality is
there. But then we're gonna get into a
conversation around the 2 party illusion,
talk about the woke right and left as
it were, and also discuss a major point
that you guys have been seeing around the
Haiti conversation
and get into the the story around all
of that, and it's exactly what you might
expect. And, again, the point being, as we
said at the time, and I'm gonna say
again today because it's the same situation,
it seems to be rife with outright lies,
deception,
complete fabrication. Well, guess that's outright lies. But
on top of that, that the story ultimately
ends up at a point where you have
subjective
claims, which means that ultimately could be the
case to some degree. It's clearly not even
remotely what the story is being presented as
in regard to the Haitian the whole story
we'll get to.
But there is an element of the story
that is true and we'll go into that
and show you what that means. And I
far as I can tell, not even remotely
from what they're putting forward or the people
they're pointing to or the images they're showing,
it seems to be a cobbled together story
from something that's been going on for a
long time that has a whole another conversation
to it. And weirdly enough, as usual, all
the big points that are being shown are
being shown to be false. Doesn't mean the
story is false, though. But the point being
that if you are in a position where
you're looking at things that are being shown
to be false, proven lies, things that are
from 4 years ago that are being shown
to be today, and all the story is,
well, you know what's happening though anyway,
except all you have are people saying, I
saw this happen. You can't see it. And
anybody can lie.
Anybody could be wrong.
So that is a data point. It is
evidence. But at that point, you don't know
for sure. And what's happening is people are
running around saying this is happening and we
can prove it. Look at all these videos,
but we just acknowledge most of those are
from 4 years ago. That one's not true.
That's a fake story. That's a person rounding
up.
But the point is, you're part of the
problem if you're pushing a story that is
false. Or rather, unverified at the moment, I
meant. Because the point is, it could end
up being false. It could end up being
true. And even if it ends up being
true, assuming is still the wrong point. Just
because you when you assume in the beginning,
just because it ends up being true does
not make it right that you assumed. And
this is an important part of what real
journalism is and what the fake point of
what all this independent nonsense is that's going
on right now. In no way is that
a knock on independent media. But I'm talking
about the nonsense going on within this part
of the field, which in my opinion is
just the mainstream media grabbing a hold of
all of what and we've been calling that
out for years now. But suddenly, most of
the people that were kind of highlighting that
problem have now shifted into being the mainstream
alternative media, which to me simply shows they
were always there to do that. And just
like with the COVID conversation, we're highlighting something
that we all cared about to gain your
trust and clout and then shift it dump
it right into Trump's lap or, you know,
r f k analogy, but whatever you wanna
call
it. But we're gonna go through that and
Honduras overlap as well and a an important
conversation around the history of that. But let's
start off today oh, first I just wanted
to shout this out.
Because this this was, and I the the
guy's account is down here. The Kifness, I
guess. I'm not really familiar with his work.
But that song is just powerful for me.
I really liked it. I said I think
we all feel this
manufactured pain and strife that the government, in
my opinion at least, has created to drive
us to fall in line, which I think
is always what happens. The moment things start
shifting in a direction that they don't like
or want or fear that they could lose
control of,
the easiest thing to do is ramp up
your pain and suffering.
Increase your threat, increase your scare, your fear,
increase any so all you do is you
look to the power structure. When you feel
outside of your control, you look to the
people telling you, don't worry, I've got it
under control. Even when they usually don't and
frankly never seem to act in your interest
anyway. The point though is that we all
feel this happening right now, and I think
that's what's happening. Driving you to fall back
and pick something that they're putting in front
of you. It mo and I say it
most definitely weighs on us all. But in
the midst of this election hype and culture
war politics that's happening from both sides, both
sides of the paradigm are the culture war
despite everyone pointing at the other side, don't
forget what is actually real.
I'm thankful for all of you. I'm thankful
for your support. I'm thankful for your belief.
I'm thankful for your concern, your compassion, your
empathy.
Being a real person.
I think we have to remember that. Get
your feet on the grass out there. Enjoy
the sun. Remember that all these things are
basically meaningless
unless you're tapped into looking through the lens
they want you to see. I don't mean
necessarily they're not happening,
but this is the same thing we said
during COVID 19. If you go out and
you stand in your front yard let's just
say you throw away all your devices, your
phones, your TVs, everything.
How long would it be before any of
this was anywhere
near you, if ever? That's not to say
that it doesn't matter. My point is simply
to say that we have to remember
that a lot of this stuff, if not
complete hype and fabrication, are things that people
force you to fixate on for their interests.
Now my point as well is to say
that, look, we should be concerned about what
your government's
money taking from you, your tax dollars are
being used to fund.
But the point is that it had it
should not, in any sense, in any of
these conversations,
consume
everything that you are all the time
because that is exactly part of the problem.
So think about that.
Now,
I know I as purple Nerples pointing on
the chat, I did see that as well,
but that's irrelevant. The point is not about
what else the content is wise. I think
the point is the song is powerful in
and of itself, regardless of other opinions people
may have, which is always the point. Now
let's start here.
An important,
image here you might have seen of a
Ukrainian group,
Ukrainian group holding a Ukrainian female soldier.
Or a Russian group. Excuse me. A Russian
group
holding a Ukrainian female
with a blindfold.
Roundly called out on the Internet as a
complete
war crime. Right? I mean, we should all
care about that. This Ukrainian woman is clearly
blind blindfolded,
and they're laughing, and they're have her guns
aimed at her head. I mean, clearly, we
should all be outraged. Right? And, of course,
all the people online were outraged. We should
be. How dare these Russian soldiers do this
to this Ukrainian woman? And, you know, anywhere
else, we'd also call it out, wouldn't we?
Oh, you would think. Because, obviously, you probably
read this before I moved down. The point
is it's actually
Israeli soldiers doing it to a Palestinian woman.
But, of course, the point is that when
you shared it like that, as Khaleesi is
pointing out, you get all these outrageous point.
How dare they?
Russians, we know they violate the law. Why?
Where's the international community?
Of course, when it turns out to be
Israeli soldiers and a Palestinian woman,
crickets.
All the same people and she she as
she says, a Russian soldier posted this photo
claiming to have captured a Ukrainian female soldier.
Immediately, 200,000 followers wrote that this was an
inhumane act.
He then replied, oh, excuse me. It's actually
Palestinians and and a woman. And then nothing.
No comments. No follow-up.
This is what we're dealing with, guys. It's
it's very selective. I don't need to convince
you of that. But just remember that. It's
the same thing we used to play. We
used to do that game in in the
past where you go, oh, breaking news. So
and so bombed the building. And then people
reacting, oh, excuse me. Never mind. It was
actually Ukraine and not and not Syria. You
know, whatever the context was. And it's it's
ridiculous how the same people suddenly change how
they feel about it. Oh, well, then it's
completely okay. But the context didn't change your
opinion of who did what, or rather who
I mean, really, at the end of the
day, you have an entity that create could
broke the law. But because they like one
of those entities, suddenly it goes, well, they
probably had a reason or whatever the narrative
is. That is the same thing happening in
our political sphere.
Now starting with the Venezuela story.
Sprinter highlights the special the special services of
Venezuela have arrested 3 US citizens and eat
one e one each from Spain and Czech
Republic who are sub suspected of attempting to
assassinate Maduro. Now this is largely coming from
Venezuela media, so obviously you should question whether
that's exactly what was happening. Just like you
should question it from the US media but,
you know, the fortune unfortunately, we don't always
get that same skepticism.
During the arrest, more than 400 American made
rifles were found and confiscated from the mentioned
persons, of course, because that's just a coincidence.
Could be. Of course, they could be using
them to make it look like it's an
American, but realize this is not new. Like
I said in the beginning,
if there's anything in this that just completely
lines up, it's that the American government just
tried to kill them again. It's not that
hard to wrap your mind around.
Now here is the, Associated Press. Venezuela says
it arrested 6 foreigners, 3 of which were
American citizens, allegedly involved in a plot to
kill him. Now it says the arrest of
the American citizens included a member of the
Navy who Cabello identified as Wilbert Joseph
Castaneda,
Castaneda
Gomez.
Cabello
said that Gomez was a navy seal who
had served in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Colombia, you
know. Because it's just very common that the
navy seals will just go off on road,
you know. It's it's what's funny about this
is it I sure know where this is
going. America was, we categorically
deny any action that would have taken out
the law, you know, whatever whatever the narrative
is. We don't break the law. We all
laugh at that because that's all they seem
to do. So but it's it's just a
statement. Statement is we didn't do it. But,
I mean, do you expect them to come
out and go, oh, you got us. You
got me. I did it. They never do
that. Never ever ever ever. You they could
you could have them nailed to the wall,
and they will say, no. It's a lie.
It was a deep fake. That just this
is what we always have to remember, whether
it's Israel, United States, or whoever you think
you support.
The point is that's obvious what's going on
here. The US State Department said they confirmed
the detention of a US military member and
said it was unaware.
It was aware, excuse me, of unconfirmed reports
of 2 additional US citizens,
which probably end up being CIA agents or
something like that. We're simply talking about a
a member of the military involved with 2
other Americans who apparently went to go I
mean, let's just pretend for sake sake of
conversation that wasn't US government organized.
That might almost make it worse that we're
talking about what rogue military assets who just
decide to take out a foreign leader, which
would still ultimately blow back on the United
States government. Or what if he's an Israeli
American? I'm just spitballing. I'm I'm not even
saying that's the case. I'm just saying you
can see how this could be something bigger.
And until we have more facts, we leave
it at the simple reality that it was
an American 2 3 Americans and 1 Navy
Seal, and the government's denying it. And we
have
a rife history of the US government doing
this many, many times. But for sake of
conversation, you could see how this might be
driven from some other angle. And I only
say those things because I sense that this
is where they are. Same with the Israeli
military. They're they have lost control of a
lot of things. Now far, far more than
the US government. But day by day, we're
watching these things diminish. So it's worth considering
what that might mean. Quote, any claims of
US involvement in a plot to overthrow Maduro
are categorically false, they said. The United States
continued to support a democratic solution. See right
there, we all should chuckle. You know, except
all the times you clearly did not in
Venezuela specifically. So it's right there where you
go, okay. Well, they could just be lying
about that to make themselves look good, but
usually that means that they're lying in general,
which means they probably tried to kill them
and then we want democracy. Except that means
that when we put someone in place that
we call democracy and we say, yes. That's
democracy.
But it's happened more than once around the
world. In fact, endless amount of times. Guaido
was an obvious game. We saw that was
a it was flimsy. Everybody laughed at it.
Guaido was a joke.
And they just kinda casually kept it going
for a long time until suddenly they needed
oil from Maduro and then, well, never mind
then. We'll just let that go. So he's
not a threat to democracy? If you need
oil, okay. That makes sense. These these people
are children.
And they know you see it. That's what's
so crazy about it. Now it says the
announcement of the arrest comes just 2 days
after the US Treasury imposed sanctions on 16
allies of Maduro, who were accused by the
US government obstructing voting during the disputed towards
July 28 Venezuela. It's only disputed in the
minds of western oligarchs and their and their
influence leaders. Let's not forget that there was,
I mean, almost a1000 as I understand it,
independent election observers like there is every time
in Bolivia and everywhere else.
Of course, they could all be lying. But
you know how much more difficult it is
to get to 800 independent different people from
multiple countries, many of which were US allies,
some of which were on the opposition,
All of which ultimately said that's completely legitimate,
including people in the opposition. I mean, I
don't know how you factor all that in
and just go, oh, but wait a minute.
So the only ones that are saying no
are all the ones in the interest of
controlling Venezuela? Well, I wonder that if they
could be making this up. Now I like,
I still always keep it open the idea
that this could all they could be manufacturing
all of that, but they've never proven that.
So it's amazing to me that we end
up in a position just like in our
political situation where you get a bunch of
narrative and a bunch of flimsy allegations and
let's just even say true allegations. Let's just
say they are trafficking cocaine and doing whatever
else, but that still doesn't prove. They cheat
in the election. All they have are claims
of, I mean, not a full picture of
the voting ballots, which they could have easily
lied about. Then what they show is not
a 100% of what they're talking about. They
have an argument around it. And the point
is that all the people involved outside of
those people say, but it all adds up.
So that's it's it's the evidence.
So you can stand back and go, I
don't trust that. Okay. Maybe you don't. But
that doesn't then immediately equal, then they must
be then they are telling the truth. It
means that you can have skepticism towards them,
acknowledge the other side hasn't fulfilled their duty
of meeting all the, you know, the
the burden of proof.
So you leave it there. But we don't
like that in this country, do we? We
like to choose what I like. I'm gonna
pick my narrative, and that's the one I
choose because that's more leaning towards my party.
You get my point.
At the moment here, from my ex if
you want my opinion, which is usually why
you're coming to the show, it seems very
clear that just like the last time, Maduro
won the election. Because he's very popular in
this country despite all of the narratives. And
it's very easy to look at.
Look at look to anything other than western
media, and even then, you find people within
that that are choosing to do a balanced
coverage of it, and you'll see when they
present all the facts that that's a very
select narrative from western manipulators.
Just like with Bolivia, it's the same thing
because the country very quickly went back the
other direction. And that's because the people made
that happen. As far as I understand it,
what's her name that they put there with
the military junta went to jail. Why don't
we hear about that? Because it only ultimately
showed you that the western governments manipulated in
that moment to get what they wanted. How
much lithium do they steal when that all
went down in the period they had it?
See, this is how it usually works so
we don't think about the bigger picture.
Goes on to say, now I mean, I
threw that out there just as a hypothetical.
I I don't know how the the time
that they fully had, I don't think it
happened before, how much long it would take
to mine. My point is that they had
interest there other than lithium as well, but
I am convinced that was a huge part
of it with Elon Musk's involvement
in many ways just by based on narrative
online and so on. Same with Venezuela.
I'll make a point about that as we
go through what he was doing around this.
The idea that he's a military contractor for
the US government using a very influential platform
to essentially publicly influence the outcome of an
election. That has to, like, if we're talking
about a state actor, or which we'll get
to in a second, the the line that
gets crossed, they claim with Russia.
Right? Well, it's it's not just people online.
It's not free speech. Those are state act
okay. But where where does that line get
crossed? I see a very fuzzy line around
where Elon is playing his role. I'm not
calling for censorship in any way, but if
it is an action, if he's taking action
based on the interest of a US government
in interest, well, then that would be state
action and that wouldn't be something he would
be allowed to you get the point. But
even because people wanna defend him, they'll jump
in and make these arguments.
Now it says at the bottom, despite international
condemnation over the election's lack of transparency, which
again, despite international condemnation,
just what's funny about it is as far
as I can tell, the majority of countries
do not dispute this. It's only the western
ones that clearly want in control here. But,
of course, AP does its job, as all
of them do, and frame it as the
entire conversation. So, you know, when they say
the, you know,
international
community, they don't they're not talking about Russia
and China and Syria and Iran. And, yeah,
I know some of you all think bad
guy because you've been brainwashed by all this
stuff. They're just other countries like the rest
of the world.
Their leaders are just as corrupt as yours
are. The point is,
the international community means just the ones that
they like and who are in their circle.
So it's not the same thing. But despite
international condemnation means the same thing. But as
far as I can tell, it's the minority.
But it says over the lack of transparency,
which I disagree with, Venezuela's supreme court, which
is long back Maduro, confirmed his victory in
August. Okay. So what that amounts to is
the court in this country supports him. Yeah.
Maybe he influences them, but they're not producing
evidence to show that he's coercing them in
any way. So see my point facts and
evidence have to matter, not just running opinion
and the memeification of everything, which is where
we are right now. Venezuela's attorney general then
filed conspiracy charges against Gonzales who fled to
Spain because that's usually what innocent people do.
Now obviously, I get it if he was
in an illegitimate situation with the cut government
that took power, he'd probably flee even if
he was innocent. But my point is the
track record here. Guaido,
Gonzales, like, you go back to Chavez and
before, we can see how many times they've
done this.
It just it's I mean, it's it's like
pretending that it's it's it's unjustified
to pretend that Trump is gonna make promises
and not follow through despite him doing that
for 4 years. Now I'm not talking about
all the things you think he accomplished. I'm
talking about the original promises of his campaign
trail that didn't come to pass.
So how he comes out and goes this
and this and this, and they're all like,
he's gonna do it all because
well, based on what? Only one of us
is acting on a track record. If you
think Kamal is any different, then you're lying
to yourself. They're all trying to manipulate you.
And there are other options I've gone into
in plenty of other shows. So if you
wanna pretend that's black billed, you can lie
to yourself all day long. Maduro, who has
been in power since 2013, has long claimed
the US is trying to overthrow him through
sanctions and covert operations. And it's guys, that's
if there's anything you're gonna believe in this,
that's easy to prove that. He's not claiming
that. He's telling you the reality that they
have done, and we can all prove it.
Now remember, the timing was interesting to me.
So this this took place
just, you know, yesterday, day before. The 14th,
13th, 14th, 15th.
I find it interesting that September 10th, Elon
Musk just kinda stopped talking about Venezuela.
Just an observation. Take that for what you
will.
Funny to me though. Right? Or actually, let's
go to latest and see if it's anything.
Yeah. So September 10th is the latest.
He simply says, national rent control will destroy
it, which that's not what Venezuela is dealing
with today. It was only happening while they
were being aggressively sanctioned by the United States
government. Starvation sanctions as they're called. The same
thing they do wrong. The same thing they're
doing to Gaza. The same thing they're doing
to Yemen. Let's pretend like it's their fault
we sanctioned them to death. Right? It's just
it's painful how stupid this can be. The
bottom line is it's September 10th,
and it is string of Venezuela, Venezuela, Venezuela,
Venezuela, which before that, he'd never even brought
up.
And then 4 days later, they tried to
kill him.
Let's not forget, by the way, that he
and Musk were going back and forth in
this weird little feud. Musk versus Maduro? Billionaire
accepts bizarre fight challenge. Is it possible that
Musk commissioned some kind of I mean, I'm
just for fun having this conversation. I genuinely
have no evidence to back it up, and
I honestly don't even think that. But it's
fun to think about. The idea that so
now we got the US government saying, we
didn't do that.
We got a US military personnel. We got
a very, very, very influential prominent oligarch technocrat
billionaire who could've made that happen. Interesting how
I the the only reason I'm even faff
for fun talking about that is because the
world is shifting right now. And I was
just highlighting the technocratic regime change dynamic about
where that goes. And by the way, the
point that I failed to mention which I
think is very relevant is just because I
feel like everybody knows this. Let's not forget
the whole, you know, economic hit man kind
of conversation, the Confessions of an Economic Hit
Man, a great book and the second one.
And the idea being essentially using the the
World Bank and using, you know, debt.
Using debt and finance to essentially
put countries
into debt based on regime change and manipulation
and sanctions and so on and then use
that debt to drive them into controlled situations.
I mean, we're watching that same thing with
a little bit of a technocratic flare. Right?
Because my point is in the in the
technotic the the Honduras conversation, which we'll come
back to,
Peter Thiel's company is literally
breaking the law and suing them based on
a contract that was created within a legitimate
government the US put in place in 2009
in Honduras.
And now they have their own little special
zone, autonomous zone, which is right under the
sustainable development goals, 2030,
which they have their own police force, taxes,
everything.
And they're literally taking control of the country.
And they're gonna sue them for $11,000,000,000.
The GDP is 34 or $35,000,000,000,
and their looks like they're gonna win. So
right there is the same dynamic with a,
like, a fast route to it.
But it's technocracy. So my point is all
this stuff is very weird concerning to me.
So this,
just want you to consider the idea that
he either could have been involved or not
at all by just his his impression of
Musk and I or rather just the idea
of Maduro, I mean. The idea that ultimately
that he stops talking about it in 10th.
I just think that's interesting. Overall, here's Maduro.
Of course, they don't they don't translate this
stuff. Twitter is so manipulative today. I swear
to god. It's so crazy. That just it
doesn't translate. And, be because I think because
what he's talking about is Twitter and Elon
Musk.
Ultimately, what he's saying is that Twitter
is in their country and it's violating the
law.
Now you could argue that he's trying to
suppress people from having their rights and and
may you could that fair argument. But in
this case, different than what we're seeing in
Brazil, Maduro is not taking action against individuals.
He's not threatening individuals that they use Twitter.
He's not sanctioning some thing. They can't use
VPNs as far as I could tell. If
you got evidence of that, send it to
me. I'll talk about it. But look, there's
I can't I can't it's not in the
conversation that I found.
The point being,
you could argue that's still suppression. And I
mean, it's a fair argument to make, but
that that begins to overlap with the other
point. If Elon is in fact, which I
don't know why anybody would outright dismiss that
unless you're some Elon fanboy fighting for some
Republican agenda, because we should just be objective
enough to say clearly this guy is not.
He's a billionaire oligarch technocrat who currently is
a contractor for the Biden government.
Make sure you understand that. And he will
be for the next government too.
Wouldn't that create some kind of an interesting
dynamic, especially since he was, like, screaming about
regime change for this country in the midst
of an election?
And Israel, who was clearly in his mind,
in his pocket, are are are lit are
are were the ones trying to make this
happen.
The woman who was try he was trying
to put in power along with Gonzales
wrote a letter to to Netanyahu in 2018
asking for him to help regime change in
Venezuela.
It's cray it's it's crazy. I did a
whole show about this. So here he is
saying that Elon's breaking the law.
And then the last part says, 10 days
to present your claims. Let the plans on
network so are violent. So basically saying, you
know, if there's you have to present evidence
and we're gonna dehash this out. Does the
Venezuelan people deserve respect.
So I just think it's interesting. This is
and, of course, then this is reader added
context and all they're saying is that's not
true. Twitter's not doing that. It's only Maduro.
It's basically what it says.
Which, no surprise there. Amnesty.
Here we go. We can translate it here.
Saying, Venezuela international organizations condemn violence and repression
and demand to guarantee the right to protest.
Right. So all this is is them highlighting
the international organizations, same old ones we've always
seen, are doing the same thing they've always
done.
Read it for yourself.
The point is we've seen this before like
we saw in Syria, like we saw in
Ukraine, like we saw in Venezuela the last
time. Remember where they were throwing Molotov cocktails
on their own aid truck full of barbed
wire and blamed it on Maduro? These are
the aid organizations that are doing the same
thing they're doing today by saying, we are
not letting us protest, but the reality as
always is these are rife with people who
are causing violence. People like,
Fiorella Isabelle, people like Dan Cohen. People have
covered this on the ground for a really
long time, including right up until the last
election.
Just make sure you understand how flimsy all
of this is.
And whether or not there's something much darker
going on, technocratically overlap. Now,
Owen, this is the same point about
oh, it's got 2 of them, it looks
like. Now that I just wanna include that
because I think it's interesting where that goes,
and I think that our government is desperate
for rare earth minerals in a lot of
ways, and I think that's one of those
directions.
So just keep an eye on how this
plays out. That's happening with all of these
countries.
Now on top of that, we have the
US government, you know, all clearly in mind
of peace,
openly justifying or allowing
strikes inside of you in Russia. But let's
be clear. This has already been ok'd and
happened. Maybe not publicly stated, maybe not acknowledged
by
Putin on some show, but I've already shown
you this so many times. The the the
flights using the the UK Times covered this.
Flying them in and, you know, or the
the the bombings we've already seen, the assassinations
in central locations in Russia. So this is
our not patron saying, I rarely if ever
tweet about Putin and what he says,
but he says that that,
it it it but this is something that
folks in NATO countries might wanna be aware
of. Putin says decision to allow long range
strikes specifically into Russia changes everything. He's not
wrong. My point is only to highlight the
fact that this is not for ask why
he wants to highlight this now and ask
why I mean, clearly, it's in his benefit
because it's completely illegitimate for the United States
and NATO who to work with a open
neo Nazi element that is secretly funded now
public by Israel and CIA to create the
Azov movement, a fascist entity to throw at
Russia like they did in Afghanistan. It's it's
an it's a very open conversation.
And this ties back to something we'll get
to later in the show around the Azov
movement, the rise above movement, Charlottesville, and a
new group called blood tribe and overlapping with
a Haiti story. It's it's all fascinating how
how intricately connected these fake stories are and
how they connect everywhere.
But the point
try to connect that thread back to what
I was saying. Anyway, the point bottom line
is that it's clear this isn't a big
deal because Ukraine
being allowed to strike into Russia
is e could easily spin out. And and,
I mean, the bottom line is we know
how this all started if we're not lying
to ourselves. Doesn't mean Russia good guy. It
simply means it's obvious based on their own
public statements, their own engagement, their own clear
propaganda push to drive this to happen. Ignoring
the ethnic cleansing going on in the Donbas
for 10 years, ignoring the reality of Crimea,
and lie after lie after lie after lie
after lie that all sides of the paradigm
seem to gobble up.
And now you're using the group that they've
grown a tear one of the most dangerous
things on the planet right now that nobody
wants to talk about, throwing them against Russia
and scooping up any innocent people they can,
forcing them into the military, and we just
act like this snake's no. It's no big
deal. You know, of course, it doesn't because
we're literally allowing Israel to commit a genocide.
That doesn't matter either apparently.
But here's who Putin says exactly. It will
mean nothing other than direct participation of NATO
countries, which my point, it's already happening and
he knows that. He's even acknowledged that before.
He says the United States, European nations in
the war in Ukraine.
This is their direct participation and this already,
of course,
significantly changes the very essence, the very nature
of the conflict. Now that was his point.
This it changes everything to acknowledge that the
US government is leading this war.
He says this would mean that the NATO
countries, the US, European countries are at war
with Russia, which if you really think for
a second he doesn't already know that, he
isn't already acting in that way,
then you're blind to yourself. I mean, it's
obvious. He's not a moron. He's one of
the most politically savvy people in this conversation.
And, no, that doesn't mean good guy and
we should support him. But it says, and
if this is the case, then bearing in
mind the change in the very essence of
this conflict, we will take appropriate decisions based
on threats that will be posed against us
opposed to us. Now, by the way, and
that doesn't I mean, I've I've the arguments
around Putin and what he is and so
on, you should decide for yourself. The only
reason I say that is because I don't
support any of these people. I'm so I'm
jaded in the political sphere. I don't think
government is the answer.
But I I can easily show you that,
I mean, just taking the last 20 years
alone and comparing foreign policy of Russia to
the United States government, it's not it's no
question.
There's no question that the government of the
United States has carried out more murder, terror,
rape, pillaging, burr everything you could talk about
than anything you could point to. It's not
up for debate. That's not a pro or
against conversation. It's fact
based. But nonetheless, I don't support any of
these people because I think that's an important
line to take. Because I think that the
government dynamic is what's but again, as I
always say at the end of that point,
the the world is not ready for that
apparently. I wish it was. We could highlight
the real problem of pretending these people have
any influence over your life other than kinetic
force.
But my point is this was a very
rational statement.
This will change the dynamic. What this means
is they're acknowledging that they're involved, and clearly,
this we that we like, he says, and
if that's the case, then bearing in mind
the change of the essence of the conflict,
we will take appropriate decision.
What's funny is that this was Netanyahu or
Trump or Biden or anybody else that would
come out and and belligerently scream about how
we're gonna murder your children. It's something as
stupid as that. I mean, obviously, not that
exactly. But like Trump, we'll go we'll take
action like never before seen if you dare
to do stuff like that. Almost verbatim.
This is what a real politician would look
like. Not the ridiculous
Rome is burning down kind of reality of
what our political sphere is. And I don't
mean that's even as a compliment. I mean
that it's just it's decorum. It's tactful. You're
simply saying the base you're saying, this changes
it and we'll take what's necessary. So it
doesn't get blown out of proportion. But what
do they do? World war 3. Putin said
world, which is what Alex Jones did.
Because why not scare everybody? I mean, it
is scary because it's your government doing this,
but that's not how that's being framed. The
reality is this is him saying what he's
always said the same way he's always said
it, and everyone blows out of proportion. The
reality is your government should be pointed at.
We should be screaming about how your government
is causing this to become reality,
not the other way around, which is what
most of the media is doing.
Keep that in mind.
Now going into the shooting of the American
citizen by another government your government supports that
clearly does not care about the law, and
they all scream about international law.
This is a this story just sad. Rachel
Corey was her name. I've just popped into
my head. I was think I remember her
last name. But Rachel Corey was the activist
that was killed
a long time ago by a bulldozer.
This is a news story. Oh, that's funny.
It's not funny, but that's
right there in front of me. Maybe I'm
I cut maybe my mind caught it and
I didn't see I didn't notice it. Anyway,
the point is, this is us all, Rod,
highlighting
the story that we've already heard. Now this
is just what we were highlighting the couple
days before. They she says they accidentally, in
quote, shot her in the head. Now her
and her name is So I'm The In
on,
Isonore.
I believe that's accurate. I'm just, you know,
especially with situations like this, it's just It's
a poor I I don't wanna
mispronounce their name at a time like that.
You know? But so the I Isonore
is a woman who was shot
by IDF
while protesting,
and they covered it up, like they always
do.
Now originally, they said, oh, it was an
accident. 1st, they just denied it, like always.
Then it was an accident. It happened very
quickly.
That went on until a new report came
out to yes, or that was today or
yesterday.
Today.
Saying that it's false. Oh, I'm sorry. Wait,
that says for 2 minutes. Oh, it's how
long it is. So, September 11th.
Saying that there was a lie.
That they were The the evidence very clearly
backs up the reality that this was not
just an accident. So, let's go through that.
And, of course, all the propagandists are saying
the same thing you might expect.
Not not not necessarily. The point is the
Israeli propagandists are out there screaming about the
narrative. Now here is the story about Sharin
Abu Akleh, that Robert covered more than once,
but this is how it ended,
September 10th, interestingly enough, 2022.
Israel covered up the murder of Shireen Abu
Akleh. Now it's worth asking yourself why these
weird these events always seem to I mean,
not always, but it's there's something to the
timing of when these things happen. It's sort
of like what,
I forget his name off the top of
my head. The former special forces guy were,
reported. Was it Greg? I forget his name
now. Stoker, I think.
You know, he's right. Every single holiday, every
single event, every time there's something going on,
whether it's an election, a debate, Christmas, Easter,
Israel murders Palestinians.
You look at you go take your time
to look it up. It's mind blowing. It
happens every single time. Now you could just
argue it's because they're kind of always killing
Palestinians, and you wouldn't be far off. But
it's not actually that it's just always happening.
They take advantage of events.
That is weird that the the another American
with a journalist or in this time an
activist was killed
almost on the same day. It's very strange.
Couple days different. Now the point,
as Matt Lieb first highlighted, so the official
explanation is that that, Eisnor and other protesters
were hurling rocks, causing an Israeli sniper who
was 2 football fields away to fear for
his safety, which is always their argument. So
he was apparently defending himself,
accidentally executing the wrong political dissident.
I agree. That's absurd
that anybody could even pretend that makes sense.
Now as I forget, Randy Fine,
who has been
endorsed by Donald
Trump, said this publicly.
Throw rocks, get shot.
One less Muslim terrorist.
Literally nobody is calling her a Muslim terrorist.
She's an American citizen activist there supporting
Palestinian rights.
This is an American
politician
who has no
I mean, talk about no decorum. Talk about
no
integrity.
No compassion. You're just gonna go, good. Murder.
Because I'm pro Israel. Like, this needs to
shake people free from their stupor.
I said, how exactly is it America First?
Which by the way, that is what he
said.
Randy Fine is a MAGA warrior who stands
up to anyone yeah. That's what Trump said.
How is it MAGA or America First to
praise the killing of an American citizen
killed by Israel?
And, no, she was not a Muslim terrorist.
But this MAGA leader is happy to tell
you that she he that he supports her
being murdered by the government who just murdered
her.
An American politician. I I just can't get
past
that. And, of course, Twitter does him a
favor by suppressing it so it doesn't reach
anywhere.
See, you think that's oh, we gotta censor
it because that's
what?
Censor what?
Throw rocks, get shot? Really?
You telling me that's worthy? I mean, guys,
the things they allow on this platform and
then then
limit the visibility of this, are you effing
kidding me? The same way they limit the
visibility of the every time I share that
video of the doctor describing what he sees
in Gaza, but you'll show those things, but
you'll censor him powerfully describing it. That's because
they're suppressing this narrative. The the entire Twitter
platform is aggressively socially engineering everybody.
It always has been, but we're talking like
something next level right now.
And, yes, censorship too, by the way, is
absolutely still happening. But I just want you
to reflect on this. This is Twitter,
Israel, through Twitter, without question, making sure these
things are not going anywhere.
Now and to and to be clear, what
I'm saying is the influence of what Israel
is trying to accomplish. If you can't see
Authentix in the verification,
the CHEQ company with the bots and the
way that they're flooding this platform
or it Musk's complete adherence to it or
Yaccarino's open statements about how they're working with
the ADL and the ADL has openly stated
they work with Twitter and they still do
to suppress anti Israel content. It's all right
in front of you, but people don't wanna
see it because they free speech.
I just like to say the words even
though I don't understand it or don't care,
because apparently what they're doing.
This guy is a monster.
Whether or not he's an American politician, he's
a disgusting human being that needs to be
called out for it. But in the world
that we're currently creating, while they're blind to
genocide, apparently this kind of person gets to
grow in power.
Now investigation from the Washington Post, which, by
the way, doesn't mean we trust Washington Post,
as always.
The point is that we should consider information
coming from all sources and come to your
own conclusions. I know. It's crazy. Right?
Investigation refutes Israel's account of shooting that killed
American activists.
An investigation conducted by The Washington Post refutes
Israel's account
of the Israel's as the Israeli military shooting
at Isanor, 26 year old American activist who
was killed in the occupied West Bank. So
the it the point is that there are
people around the world who are trying to
expose to you, which we'll get to today,
about what's going on in the West Bank.
It's one of the most important parts of
this new direction because it I mean, the
narrative just doesn't move over to the West
Bank, guys. It just doesn't. No matter what
they say, even if you argue that even
though Robert's proven this about the remnants of
any Hamas overlap to certain individual, there is
no Hamas presence in real in reality in
the West Bank. There's overlapping connections because of
everything we've talked about. And Robert even say
maybe you're gonna find an individual who is
part of Hamas but not acting in official
capacity there. And even if they are, the
acts they're taking by and large across the
West Bank are not because of Hamas. My
point is the facts don't back that up.
And as they've roundly shown,
they're murdering people in their beds.
It doesn't matter whether you think that's okay
or not. It's not. It's against the law.
Even if they're an ISIS member, it's against
the law. You're murdering people, especially with their
families, not in active combat. I know the
US government loves to put that to bed
because, well, we got him.
The person that you claim was bad even
though you worked with him your entire life,
you know, kind of a dynamic.
Or that's it. Who knows what actually happened?
You you pick the story. That could apply
to a number of the ones they've done.
Bottom line,
the way that they're conducting this in the
West Bank is exposing the reality to people
that might not yet have seen it that
this is about all of Palestine. It's about
destroying Palestine,
period. With the seemingly the most suffering possible.
Now it says,
Igi, with the last name Igi, was was
shot in the head by an Israeli sniper
bullet during the protest against
illegal Jewish settlements in the West Bank. Illegal
according to everybody.
Organized by the International Solidarity Movement, ISM.
The Israeli military said it was highly likely
one of its soldiers shot her, but claimed
the headshot was unintentional,
and that the real target was the key
instigator of the riot that was taking place.
Oh, so another person throwing rocks. So that
makes sense then. Right? Let's not forget Trump
openly saying that we should shoot children
at the border throwing rocks.
Nobody should be okay with that, guys. It's
unreal what we're pretending is okay because we
have been
dehumanized or they have been dehumanized.
But the post investigation, which was based on
videos, photos, and eyewitness accounts, found that Igi
was shot
more than half hour more than a half
hour after
Israeli soldiers confronted the protesters,
and 20 minutes after the protesters moved down
the road. Okay. So no question.
Their narrative is a flat out lie. So
the idea is that we were shooting at
the main instigator
to to stop the protest. So that means
while it was going on, which is what
they're saying.
Except the problem is that the actual protest
had already been shut down and moved away.
So that's a lie. It doesn't matter what
else do you hurt, that's a flat out
lie. So they made this up, probably knowing
that you could look and tell they were
lying, which happens every time, who knows why,
to pretend they didn't do it on purpose.
It says they confronted the protesters 20 minutes
after, moved down the road, and were more
than 200 yards away from the Israeli forces,
a distance where they could pose no threat.
So the point is they weren't the protests
had been moved away.
They weren't engaging with the massive protests. They
moved them away. They were far enough away.
There was no personal threat. There is no
way that you can claim this was done
out of defense or that they were doing
it to shut down the thing they had
already stopped. Now it says the shooting occurred
near a Jewish settlement known as Ivatar outpost,
you know, occupied Palestinian territory that was first
built in 2021
and recently given approval by the Israeli government,
which by the way is illegal. According to
United Nations, according to United States, even is.
No question.
Nobody cares though, apparently. Palestinians Palestinian residents in
the area met near the outpost on Fridays
for weekly prayers as an act of protest.
So here's the point. They steal the land
of Palestinians. Literally, everybody other than Israel acknowledges
that.
Then they go to protest by praying
in the area.
What monsters?
That this happens all the time.
Now, a local resident, a member of the
Palestinian National Council told The Post that the
Israeli military began coming to the area to
break up the prayers. Because we can't have
you, you know, engaging in your rights
as long you know, that that irritates us.
Right? So go go say like, the point
is that you have to acknowledge that in
in even in Israel, they pretend that you
have religious rights.
But not if it bothers them, though.
The Zionists.
Now it's and, of course, ignoring for the
fact that even Ben Gavir will literally champion
and lead in violent
storming groups into Al Aqsa Al Aqsa Mosque,
Shooting people. Sometimes live ammunition, sometimes throw up
bullets, gas grenades, while they're praying.
That's it. They love to do that. They
run-in there and they beat people up and
they throw gas grenades inside of a mosque.
But you don't hear about that that often,
do you? Happens constantly.
They call it storming the storming a locks.
They do it all the time.
Now it says, of course, that they suppress
us with tear gas, bullets, but the activities
continued.
Real bullets, mind you, in this case. On
September 6, the day Iggy was shot, the
Israeli military confronted the Palestinian residents. They used
tear gas, live ammunition
according to the eyewitnesses, and clearly, because she
was shot. The post said photos showed some
of the protesters throwing stones.
That's it, guys. They were praying. And this
is even according to the Israeli narrative.
And you can see them in the picture
they use. Iggy, who was attending her first
protest in the West Bank, immediately ran for
cover.
So now we the part not only did
they move them away, they she's ran away
and found cover in an olive grove when
the violence began. So she wasn't even around
them, regardless of the story. And guys, and
this is all, you know, whether you you
question everything all the time. The fact that
the Washington Post is writing this story and
using Israeli sources needs to matter.
You could consider that they're lying.
But if you would only consider that they're
lying and not consider that Israel's lying, ask
yourself, you know, maybe you should reflect on
why that is.
She was shot after 20 minutes of calm,
according to the Washington Post and Israeli sources.
During which the Israeli soldiers were over 200
yards away from the protesters. A Palestinian teenager
who was about 20 yards away from Igi
was wounded by the Israeli gunfire.
They they were just literally shooting because they
know they can get away with it right
now. I mean, think about how crazy it
is. They can literally assassinate to the head,
shoot with a sniper bolt to the head,
an American.
Not that that should make any difference to
the outrage the the idea that a people
were killed, but from an American government perspective,
that you could murder an American
in live in in broad daylight with people
watching with film
and nothing happens.
Literally nothing, they, I'm outraged, and we'll let
them investigate.
That's it. What do you think that shows
these soldiers? They can do think about now
what they they they're gonna they to Palestinians.
If they can get away with shooting an
American citizen alive broad or live coverage,
or rather just, you know, get gets covered
live in general,
they're gonna go out and commit even more
atrocities to the children, the women, the innocent
that have no recourse. That have no one
to talk to, no one to listen to
their cries.
We already know that's happening.
That's what your legacy is out there who's
allowing this, the governments that are ignoring
it makes me sick.
The post said the Israeli military did not
respond to questions of course. When Israel first
said this force is unintentionally shot,
shot
Igi,
president Biden backed the calm, not the claim.
Apparently, this was an accident, he says. Oh,
apparently.
Can you imagine if this was the other
I mean, look at look at the way
they've covered the Israeli American who got killed
by IDF bombs, by the way,
which we're gonna get to in a second.
Outrage.
Wall to wall coverage of how we need
to do this and we need to do
that. This oh, it's an accident apparently. They're
looking into it. Next story.
Sure glad they're America first. Right?
Not Republicans if you wanna take that or
any of them. Sure glad they care about
Americans first. Right?
They're always real first.
And if that doesn't matter to you, again,
how is that possible?
Apparently, it was an accident. It ricocheted off
the ground, he said. And she got hit
by an accident.
I'm working that out now.
I'm working that out now. So you state
as fact that it was an accident, but
then end by saying we're working that out.
So you're repeating that that was a fact.
I mean, this is disgusting.
Zombie zombie Zionist Biden just saying what he's
told. Biden later released a statement saying he
was outraged
over the killing, but still repeated the claim
that it was an accident and that they're
investigating their own. Quote, Israel's acknowledged this responsibility.
No. They have not. And a preliminary investigation
has indicated that it was a tragic error.
The US government has had full access to
their preliminary investigation. Oh, so in other words,
they gave you what they wanted you to
look at?
How pathetic these people are. And expects con
and and, and expects continued access to what
they hand you.
Guys, if we can't see the unnerving reality
of how clearly we are taking control of,
I don't know what else to show you.
I mean, I frankly think you all can.
I think the crazy thing is that we're
being led by a bunch of zombie 2
party paradigm liars that we all kind of
acknowledge, but we just don't know what else
to do. That's what it feels like we
are right now. This is an American citizen
murdered by a foreign government on record, publicly
shown. And this has happened many times before.
And what do they do about it? They're
gonna let us know what to do next.
Thanks, Biden. Or Trump. Or Kamala. Or RK.
Whoever was there, it would be the same
damn thing and you know it.
Now let's use, you know, look up her
name on Google.
So nothing, apparently, of this point. Washington Post,
a leading group in the me in the
minds of mainstream followers, comes out and
says
I guess with the yeah. Well, I think
it's just the way back or the archive.
New video witness challenges really accounting of the
activist killing. Oh, it's a very flimsy way
to write that. When you read the article,
it's they're lying. Period.
Either way, they water it down because that's
what they do.
But why isn't that here? Why is you
look at her name, I find it strange
that the guardian comes up and it's like,
oh, well, they had a funeral.
Oh, no story about how they lied about
shooting her? There's nothing, guys, except here's the
anti war.
I mean, here's Manda Weiss. Right? But no
Fox News, no CNN, no MSNBC.
You know exactly the point. I don't even
need to tell you what the point is.
So we're all outraged about how they fill
in the blank for Trump or Kamala even
though it's so stupidly obvious what's going on
in my opinion. We don't care about the
reality of American citizen being murdered by a
foreign government that won't even tell you, but,
yeah, no big deal.
Focus on the 2 party paradigm. Shut up.
Makes me very sad
for where some people are right now.
Associated Press in regard to hostages in general.
Breaking news. Israeli military says 3 hostages recovered
months
ago were likely killed in November Israeli strikes.
Wow. It's almost like you've heard that somewhere
before. Remember when we highlighted this reality about
how they were murdered by these IDF bombs
because that's what they said? That's what the
other hostages said and have now maintained all
the way back home? And that and still
we get called liars? Still we get same
with the Bebas children that they still try
to use as the father said publicly they
were killed.
Now, of course, you could argue that that's
maybe he comes out tomorrow and says, no.
They made me say that. And then we
could correct the story. The point is the
reality is he on the record said they
were killed by these bombs. Every single hostage
that has come
home has continued to back up what they
said on those videos. Every single one of
them. And now the narrative we know is
not that where they gave us pizza, they
or whatever it was. They took us shopping.
They were shielding us. Noah Arghamani said he
literally shielded her body from the bombs. Put
his own life in her way to save
her from the IDF bombings.
Kinda hard to reconcile that with what they're
telling us. So the point is, guys, they're
killing their own hostages. I don't believe for
a second this is by accident. At the
very least, it is complete disregard, which, by
the way, is what pretty much the entire
conversation in Israel is right now.
And so here we are getting lied to
by Blinken and Matt Miller and Biden and
Trump and RFK and Colson Gavin and all
the rest of them, when literally everything
else is telling you that they're lying to
you.
Doesn't that look like a very weird controlled
dynamic in specifically a western country? It should.
It should scare you as we're bullrushing into
this election where all of them are saying
the same thing on that topic. That should
worry you.
Here's what the article says. Now this is
about a a a humanity missile, but it's
about this part down here, saying Israel says
high probability its strike killed 3 hostages.
On Sunday, the Israeli military said there was
a high probability that 3 hostages found dead
months ago were killed in their own airstrike.
Let's be clear about
this. There's been at least 4 examples of
verifiable.
Not I'm not even talking about the 3
they shot,
which I'll bring up since I mentioned it
and it's gonna come up in a second
anyway.
They have killed plenty of their own people.
Hannibal Direct has been admitted too. We'll get
to that in a second too.
But not just in October 7th into what's
going on in Gaza. Their own people have
come back every one of them and said
they were more afraid of the IDF bombs.
As you'll see with the countless amount of
articles,
free top, of course.
Thanks, Business Insider. I wonder if that's normal
for old articles
to put behind a paywall.
Or is it just that you don't want
people seeing this?
Freed Israeli captives
were held by Hamas terrified IDF strikes would
kill them. What'd he know? You read the
article, even the title kinda waters down. The
title is not the title where we were
more afraid,
more afraid of IDF bombs than we were
of the Hamas people watching us.
I'm trying to find there's there's plenty of
them. Oh, yeah. Oh, that's good. I'll grab
our article too. I forgot about that.
Robert wrote this, freed Israeli captives, more than
one. I mean, all of them as far
as I can tell. Admitted more fear of
IDF bombs than Hamas.
How these things don't matter to people? I
have no idea.
It's incredible to me.
Business Insider.
Now, it goes on to say, in this
report, the army said there was high probability
that they were killed in the airstrike
based on where the bodies were recovered. Pathological
reports and other intelligence
according to that. It says, but it said,
it is not possible to definitively determine the
circumstances of their deaths.
Great. So you know what's great about this?
The the Israelis can go, it's it's never
we can never know for sure.
Interesting. So then explain for me how you
somehow know for sure they were killed by
Hamas when you find their bodies after the
fact, which happen every time. Every time.
If you even listen to their own stories,
they tell you they go in, they find
their bodies dead. Okay. Well, how do you
know you didn't bomb them to death when
you were bombing Hamas in those locations? Which
is what happens every time before they find
them.
My answer is no. It's a no brainer,
guys. So the logic only applies one way
when you want it to. Funny how that
works.
It says la late last month, Israel recovered
the bodies of 6 hostages that it says
were killed by Hamas captors shortly before Israel
forces arrived. The army's announcement in the first
so again, the point is when they found
it, they just said, Hamas did it. Now
they're ref going, well, maybe it was us.
Who knows why? I I mean, frankly, it
could be that there is really a a
diva, a kind of a s
what's the word I'm looking for?
A schism between IDF and, like, the military
and the government right now. It really is
clear. They're saying things that the government doesn't
want to say. It's interesting, and maybe that's
this. I really don't know. The truth is,
we knew this already. But this is the
IDF telling you that they think it might
be them, but we're not sure. That's the
story.
But the army's announcement in the fur it
is the first time it has been linked
it has linked the deaths of hostage in
general to its own air strikes, but now
it has happened. In other cases of bodies
being recovered, the army has said people were
either killed on October 7th,
died in a mass captivity, or were killed
by the militant crew. Now,
for anybody objective, this should open the door.
It already should've been opened, but it should
open the door to the reality that maybe
they were all killed by their bombs. Seeing
as how all the hostages tell you that
they're being treated generally okay,
They are kidnapped,
or POWs depending on if they're IDF.
But they are telling you that they're more
afraid of these bombs.
And that many of them even said they
have permanent hearing damage because of the ongoing
nonstop 2,000 pound bombs destroying everything above them.
And, like, it's like it's like earthquakes and
shattering. I mean, read these articles. It's terrifying.
Non stop. Like, imagine you're in a basement
and you're just being bombed with these bombs
that are, you know, £2,000 bombs. They're gigantic.
So now, I think we know the reality
here. In December, the army acknowledged mistakenly killing
3 hostages, which I am there's no way
this is a mistake. I just I've said
this so many times.
They came out with a sheet with an
SOS on it. There are 3 Hebrew speaking
Israelis. And they come out and say, don't
shoot us in Hebrew, and they pop, pop,
kill 2 of them right away. 1 of
them runs away. It's all written in this
article from the BBC. Israel's even acknowledged it.
They say it's all an accident.
Now the guy who ran away, 20 minutes
later, he comes back out after being coaxed
out by the IDF.
Whole time going, look, I'm Israeli. Don't shoot
me.
He walks around the corner, 2 of them
kill him. It's all right here in this
article.
Oopsie.
I mean, if you're an Israeli, I don't
know how in the world you can even
continue to live in this con I mean,
think about what they're doing to you.
Now it says, it was believed that 3
had either,
yeah, that that had fled or been abandoned.
Now, of course, we'll never know because they
murdered all 3 of them. Now it's also
possible they just killed them because of the
story they were telling. Who ultimately knows? The
Hannibal directive is in effect. We can't disregard
anything like that. Around 250
hostages were taken on October 7th. Israel now
believes a 101 remain in captivity.
Think about that.
A 101.
So we're talking about a 149
people that were almost likely killed by IDF
bombings. Do you realize how much hey. I
mean, where is this real quick?
Oh, I think it's further down here. There
it is. Guys, do you realize how much
they've bombed in this area?
Imagine I mean, these people were scattered this
I mean, regardless, they've been bombing the safe
zones, whatever you wanna call that. The areas
they've been moving on. Right? In the 1st
week, they bombed the corridor, they bombed the
path they were taking, they bombed the original
safe zone, they've been bombing everything the entire
time. This map is overwhelmingly
obvious. They bombed everywhere.
The point is, if you know that your
hostages are scattered around this area, you've murdered
them. I mean, ask yourself I mean, look,
I I almost guarantee that some of them
died from, whatever other reason. It's certainly possible.
Other things that have happened. Maybe there's Hamas
members that just didn't care and killed them.
But it's pretty obvious based on everything we've
seen that almost all of them were, in
many cases, protecting them from other people in
Palestine who maybe didn't wanna carry out an
axe against them for their own personal reasons.
That they were saying don't. They're under our
protection. There's 3 videos like that. Then the
point is that they're clearly trying to use
this to get their own people back. Now
within all of that, somebody could've probably just
decided to kill one of them or maybe
they got angry or maybe it's an accident.
The point is it's certainly possible. And with
everything we see and now with this admission
and all the facts that we have, it's
almost a no brainer that these people are
being killed
1 by 1 by their own bombs. And
by the way, that's pretty much what the
Israeli population is currently saying.
A 149
of them have been killed.
Why? We don't really hear much about that,
do we? I wonder why. And it says
so in it now believes a 101 remain
in captivity, including 35 were thought to be
dead.
So now no. Again, take it back. So
the other 35 on top of that. More
than a 100 were free during a ceasefire
in November in exchange for the release of
Palestinian prison imprisoned by Israel. 8 have been
rescued by their by their forces. Right? So
you can arguably say that a 15049
have been killed
in their alleged effort to save 8 of
them. And that's not even really how this
works out. Half of those people they stumbled
across, that's like the one they just found
is the Muslim guy they claim they rescued.
No. That story was revealed too. They they
randomly found him. Surprised they didn't murder him
too. Then they made up an entire story
about some long term investigation.
It's completely lied about. Their own sources told
us that. The problem is most Americans just
don't look at Israeli media.
Pretty wild.
Now ultimately,
the ceasefire point is very important. Right? Because
let's not forget, as we've shown you countless
times, here's Times of Israel, wrote this article
on April 26th.
The point, along with a lot of other
important stuff in this, it says we later
found out that Hamas, and this is Israeli
sources, had offered an, on October 9th,
2 days after October 7th or on 10th,
to release all civilian hostages in exchange for
the idea of simply not entering the strip.
That's it.
But they didn't. They refused. And best what?
They not only refused, they hid this from
everybody.
They protect Netanyahu publicly said, Hamas doesn't want
a deal. Actually, at first, they simply said,
the deal's later. We're gonna deal with Hamas
first, so don't even talk about it. The
deal is secondary, they kept saying.
And here's one of the
CBS news or CBC news or,
videos from 11 months ago, defeating Hamas' priority,
everything else is secondary, Israel says. It's the
truth. It's what they said. They just don't
want you to remember that now because that's
really looks really bad for them because of
what's happened.
The point is they had offered it. Now
once that narrative went away, or rather people
found out, they were saying, no. No. No.
We don't want that deal. They then shifted
into Hamas won't even let it happen. But
they were lying. They were turning it down
every time, not telling anybody. Then it became
to the point where it became very publicized,
and then it got 3 different times where
Israel said, it's up to you. Then they
accepted, then Israel rejected it and said, no.
Never mind.
Their people see this. There's no way around
it. Had they accepted this in the first
few days, all of them would be safe
right now.
Instead, they're being murdered 1 by 1 by
Israel.
Now the IDF publicizes, accord the Jerusalem Post
posted this, can probe confirming it mistakenly killed
3 hostages in Gaza bombing. That's the Jerusalem
Post.
This is from today.
IDF publicizes probe confirming
it mistakenly killed 3 hostages.
So
that and this is about the hostages that
they claimed earlier were killed by Hamas. That's
the story.
So you should be questioning everything always.
More so now because you just found out
that they, oops, made a mistake or most
likely blatantly lied. Who knows why they're now
pointing it out?
So the story comes back to the point
of an American citizen they just murdered, and
you should be asking that. Now here's my
point they always make about these ridiculous liars.
Eva Klompass has shown herself to be one
of the most shameless liars in this conversation.
Here she is going quoting these family members.
Lives hanging the balance. And here's how she
quotes it. Grieving and brokenhearted, these unbelievable parents
haven't stopped fighting to save the remaining hostages.
Now let's not forget, and Eva Klompas' whole
line is
we need to, you know, at same they're
all the same they're all doing. Release the
hostages. It's on you, Hamas. It's Amer
demand. They release the hot that's not what
they're saying.
She's pretending that they're saying this to you.
I'll play the best video to you. They're
saying this. They're literally going, it's your fault,
Netanyahu. It's your fault, Israeli government. That's what
they're saying.
And she uses this to make it seem
like they're all in solidarity calling the world
to release the we're fighting together in solidarity
against Hamas. Release the hostages. No. They're pointing
to people like you, Eviva. They're saying you
guys are responsible for making this not happen.
You should have taken a deal. That's what
they're saying.
Think about gross that is for someone like
this. It's the same way that she and
the rest of them use the Beavis family.
They, out near daily, will post these pictures
of them and say, don't forget the Biebes.
You guys murdered them.
And you keep using them anyway. That's just
monstrous.
Rachel and John have a message for what
you can do to help. That's how she
frames this. So what you can do to
help, what we can do to help is
demand that you and other Zionist manipulators
actually ask what the people want, which is
the deal. Here's what they actually said. Still
in mourning,
but we are also in an emergency
situation.
We're speaking on our behalf,
but also
in the sweet memories
of the precious souls of Hirsch,
Alex,
Almog,
Ori,
Edin, and Carmel.
Their deaths
could have and should have been avoided.
People in positions of power
failed them and failed us as their families.
No other family should experience what we're experiencing.
We must continue to act to save the
remaining 101.
What do you think I mean, it's very
clear. People in power have failed us.
So are you are you talking about Hamas
power structure? Because that's the only way your
narrative of EVA could make sense, is if
they're going, the Hamas leadership didn't listen to
our vague demands to release their only leverage.
That makes no sense at all. They're saying
as the rest of Israeli society is saying,
Israel
and Netanyahu have let us down.
They have totally killed our people and don't
take a deal that would bring them home.
You think I'm wrong? Listen to all of
the conversation you're seeing. It's literally across the
board.
Now let's not forget, by the way, this
is why they know that. Here is
antiwar.com,
and this is widely reported. Netanyahu
rejects US assessment on the ceasefire.
This is on September 5th. He says,
there's not a deal in the making.
You realize this is at the same moment
Blinken's going around saying it's up they say
it's every single time. Or Biden's going, we're
making good headway on the deal. And he's
like, what deal?
I just it's incredible.
It's schizophrenic. I don't know how this is
still happening.
Yeah. Right. The White House is claiming it's
90% done.
I mean, it's it's not only just wrong
and and confusing.
It's grotesque. It's insulting.
What they're doing is allowing them to keep
murdering children. You don't you think that's by
accident? This is not clumsy. This is deliberate
to allow it, to make you feel confused,
to allow Netanyahu to keep murdering people. All
Netanyahu, in my opinion, is doing is just
taking advantage of that.
He knows they're gonna hold water for him.
He knows they're gonna gaslight everybody and lay
shade for his narrative.
So what does he do? Instead of just
using the narrative the way they lined it
up, he jumps over the top and goes,
there's no DOU. US is lying.
And still they hold his water. Still they
maintain it. I don't know what you call
that. Blackmail, influence, threats, control, whatever you wanna
call it. That's not what normally happens in
fair dynamics,
where you agree with things, or you have
a a a joint agenda, or you're both
fighting for control of people. No. This is
Netanyahu going, you do what I tell you
and then I'll still make you look stupid.
And they still do it anyway. Over and
over and over and over. And videos come
out where he admits that he can make
them do what they ever want, then later
he comes back and they do what he
wants
over and over. And it's not just Netanyahu.
It's the Israeli government as far back as
you wanna look.
It should be unnerving for you if you're
actually an objective, honest person.
Here is the his horets from Israeli media.
How Netanyahu has systematically foiled talks to release
the hostages. But they're all racist apparently for
pointing out these obvious facts from Israeli media.
Now here is
our ambassador.
What's her name? I forget her name all
of a sudden.
You'll see her in the in the video.
Saying that it's a difficult situation.
And we just don't have the right circumstances
to give them the state that they and
then, of course, Francesca Albanese comes in and
says, you're a moron. That's not real or
even accurate. The point is that you don't
decide. There's not some kind of community structure
or some kind of committee that decides that
they get self determination.
It is. It's like free speech. It is
simply there.
Here's what she had to say. Is the
US going to do as more and more
countries as they are
are starting to recognize the Palestinian state, and
the Palestinians are becoming,
eligible for membership
in some of these organizations? A state
has certain For the podcast, Linda Thomas Greenfield.
The one that has vetoed the ceasefire
5 or 6 times and then comes around
and acts like we need a ceasefire because
they're disgusting people. Responsibilities
for its people.
And Palestinians are becoming Organizations. A state
has certain responsibilities
for its people.
And I do not believe the Palestinians
as they ex And the person that quoted
it or that she was quoting made a
point to say, look at the way their
hands move when she says the word Palestinians.
Like it it should they're writing away. I
mean, it just shows you like like almost
uncomfortable, like, you know that the Palestinians,
you know, it's like
it you're like almost like you're saying that
it's like it's the kind of an unreal
thing. I don't know. You can decide for
yourself but I agree. Whatever it means, the
way she does that seems to suggest that
she's almost like because to be to be
honest, you've seen the way,
KJ P and plenty of others, like, try
to avoid even saying the word because I
think Israel is clear that they don't exist.
Right?
People. And I do not believe the Palestinians
as they exist right now,
have that means.
All of the elements to give its statehood.
That seem that's her point. You don't this
is not like some committee of the world
that goes you now have a state. It's
self determination of the Palestinian people.
The only reason it's not in existence is
because Israel has its boot on their neck.
And what and, gee, I wonder if that's
the the factor that's not allowing them to
have the circumstances.
These people are absolute monsters. And just because
they pretend that they're modern, you know, balanced
and and object, these people I I you
I I don't for one second think that
she doesn't know what she's doing.
You don't you don't think she sees the
children being blown to pieces in Israel right
now? And she's making a case for why
that needs to continue.
And so, yes, there are a large number
of states that are recognizing Palestinian,
statehood.
They have now been given an The majority,
by the way, of the world. An alphabetized
place,
in the, in the general assembly, but they
we have to deal with the issues of
of peace and security. Okay. Okay. So what
she's saying is even though they're in the
UN now, which they are, and even though
the world and the UN and international bodies
and human rights, because everyone in the world
acknowledges that this is all a legitimate apartheid
state occupation, you just don't want it yet.
So you have all the other things, but
you can't have the state.
All that shows you is that they're artificially
holding them back from having what every other
you don't have a place in the UN
if you don't have a state. This is
the US government in Israel making sure it
doesn't happen. You know what's funny about that?
It's the 2 people screaming the loudest about
how they want a 2 state solution, making
sure a 2 state solution ever happens.
Good old fashioned politics.
And all of that is gonna have to
be negotiated
between the two parties on the ground for
this to work I see. In an effective
way. So Israel has to say okay to
giving them a 2 state solution so they
can have self determination. So it's Israel's decision,
apparently.
Even though she didn't say that, that's exactly
what that means, and they know that. So
she's a gold star. Good job. That's what
she she that that is her doing her
job in Israel's mind.
That's my opinion, obviously.
How do we not see this?
How continually they will act
outwardly.
We want this and in a rules based
order and freedom and democracy, free speech, and
then just ex not just don't do it,
but attack those things. It's just you all
see this. I don't need to convince you
of how ridiculous all this is. Here's what
Francesca Albany says about this.
With all due respect, that's not accurate. Palestinians
have a right to self determination
that means Israel's and others' duty to allow
Palestinians
and to enjoy their right to exist and
determine themselves, I e, right to self determination,
in their land. You don't get to dictate
dictate what they decide in their land.
Statehood, she says, is the form of self
determination
that Israel and the PLO started negotiating over
30 years ago. The enjoyment of self determination
is not negotiable,
quote, by the parties on the ground.
Should statehood be obstructed,
which is what's happening, and Israel persists in
maintaining control over their land, then it must
recognize full rights to all Palestinians.
Apartheid is no longer an option, which is
what she's allowing to maintain.
Because you owe what she's Francesca Albanese is
simply pointing out the law.
They don't get to maintain belligerent occupation for
75 years. The point is clearly, which I,
you know, disputing the time frame and what
narrative
however, whatever the number you think is accurate
for the actual occupation everyone dispute, I argue
the entirety Palestine has been occupied for 75
years, and it's not even an argument. It's
in UN documentation.
The point, though,
is that you either then the the reality
of the law is that first of all,
occupation is illegal.
But then if ultimately if, you know, through
as even though that's reality of just human
conquest and governments right up to this day,
US government everywhere. The point is once you
take the territory, you're supposed to allow people
to go back to the areas, to their
homes. You don't remove them. You don't ethnically
cleanse.
Then those people then are afforded the rights
of the current situation.
None of those things have ever happened and
that's because they always go Hamas.
Because Hamas did it. And of course, that's
always why it's important to remember that's why
Israel made sure that Hamas was in power
So that they could always use this excuse
to stop them from having the 2 state
solution.
There's no way to understand the situation without
first acknowledging
that undeniable reality. Right? This was a manufactured
problem.
And this is what Israel's done with everything
we've talked about.
I mean, you guys have seen this so
many times. So you're saying Benjamin Netanyahu deliberately
boosted Hamas to try to prevent a Palestinian
state? Yeah. Sure. He deliberately and systematically
even even told this on record
whoever wants to avoid
the threat
of a 2 state solution
has to support my policy of paying protection
money to the Hamas. So what we did,
with the permission of our prime minister is
to let
Qatar
to transfer
a huge amount of money in cash,
probably more than
1.4
$1,000,000,000. By doing it, we increase the power
of Hamas.
We
did everything in order to make sure that
Hamas will go on controlling Gaza,
and Palestinian authority
will control the West Bank so they will
fight each other.
That's all it is about.
I mean, that that's the former head of
Shin Bet. That's that's a former prime minister.
I mean, you know, and then in case
you care, here's Harrett making sure you understand
that this is what he said in his
own Knesset meeting in 2019.
Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of
Palestinian state has this bolsters support bolstering Hamas,
giving money to Hamas. That's not for humanitarian
aid, guys. The narrative is a lie. It's
obvious this is about, as he says, keeping
them from having what we publicly wanted everyone
to think we were trying to accomplish. It's
absurd how obvious this is. Here's the article
from Mossad,
2020. And the reality is this goes right
after October 7th. Masa chief visited Doha urging
Qatar to continue
Hamas financial aid. So the bottom line is
always is that they did this in order
to make sure they could blame Hamas for
not allowing the situation.
So the dynamic ends up in this situation
where they didn't give them the rights because
they made a threat that they said was
their fault and then forced them to work
within this dynamic so then they could later
go, look. They're all Hamas.
And you've maintained an apartheid o state occupation
devoid of their rights for 75 years.
And now she's over here going, we have
to let them decide like they haven't been
trying already.
And that leaves them in an apartheid occupation
forever. And the US government knows this.
I mean, there's no disputing it. Francesca Albanese
is simply pointing to the law. They just
simply say the law doesn't apply because they're
bad guy.
Apparently not.
Include these for you to make sure you
can share these people even though people that
need to hear these things rarely want to
acknowledge that they exist or they have a
narrative around why they're supposed to ignore it.
Now, here back to Ava Ava Ava Clampus
and how dishonest she is.
We saw this last time we talked about
this. Sam Husseini was calling this out. All
she does is screenshot which comes from the
Jewish news syndicate that po that claims con
news made the claim. And that's the and
and maybe they did on some broadcast, but
it's not rooted in fact anywhere other than
those two points.
And she says unable to find evidence of
a genocide taking place in Gaza, really is
what she said. South Africa has asked the
inner the IG, the ICJ for an extension,
but they've denied it. That's that's supposed to
be the narrative.
Even though the amount of evidence that is
on just on TikTok and Twitter from their
own people committing genocide is obscenely obvious. The
point is this doesn't seem to even be
real. You wanna see the reality of why
this actually got kicked up forward and people
like Habibas lie to you about it? Because
the day before,
Israel asks congress
to
congress to press South Africa to drop the
case.
I mean, it's just so silly. Here's Barack
Reid, by the way. Earlier, his point was
not referenced again. I'm just making that clear
again.
Pointing this out.
September 9th.
The next day, oh my god. They got
denied. They're lying. There is no evidence. Everybody
look away.
You know how desperate that is? You know
how ridiculously,
embarrassingly desperate it is for them to have
just manufacture fake net? Like, they know what
they're doing. That means the entire platform just
cobbled together a lie just to push something
on you. The reality is, it is happening.
The evidence is unbelievable,
and we're gonna see this flush out. Israel
tried to pressure congress, the US congress, which
they then dutifully tried to do, because we
saw that, to shut down this whole thing.
How pathetic.
These are genocide supporting monsters who are being
caught, and they don't like it.
Now talking about the UNRWA discussion.
You know, again, despite the reality of how
often we talk about this
And again, I've shown this so many time.
It bring up 17 articles like this that
go right up until, like, a month ago.
Israel yet to provide evidence to back up
the unreclaimed about October 7th, or that they're
part of the mosque. Both Canada, the United
States, and seemingly everybody has acknowledged that that
was a claim.
And I mean, there's possibility to there. I
mean, my point is you have the overlap
of Hamas that was made the government because
Israel made that the case.
And then these people in this entire society
were forced to operate through Hamas to get
driver's license, to get anything. That's why you
end up having the documents with logos on
it. Now it's all the way to this
day. They go, look. They're Hamas because of
this overlapping thing.
And or just lie about it because most
of them know they're not stupid enough to
it's so clear that they're making all this
up.
Because UNRWA is about the right of return.
It's about the evidence they have showing because
that's the entire point of what this organization
was created to do. And it's becoming a
organization because people have remained as refugees
for
decades.
The whole point was they were supposed to,
right away, let them go back to their
homes. That was the legal point I just
talked about. They didn't. Most of these Palestinians
still have keys to their homes that Israelis
from New York live in. Or rather American
Israelis live in the that that's how that
we're seeing all over this illegal occupation.
And the whole point was Unruh kept track
of that. They knew who was supposed to
go back where, and that's why Israel has
ever since been so desperate to destroy them.
So here we have another one of their
embarrassingly flimsy
propaganda stories.
So here is Kosher,
whoever this person is going, just released breaking
footage.
IDF just released this footage of UNRWA
headquarters
in Gaza? You know how many times they've
said this about Hamas headquarters? It's it's whatever
they're pointing at that day. Apparently, this tiny
room
with one desk and a chalkboard and some
wires and a chair in the corner, that's
there. Come get corners.
And the only thing that makes it seem
like, are we to believe they're working on
this gigantic drone on this weird short little
table?
I mean, maybe. But I mean, my point
is that it's I mean, look, it's core
anything. Of course, it's possible.
But do you realize how many times the
IDF has been, like, immediately,
not just caught by people, like, shown by
Israeli media, shown by BBC and CNN to
be like, oh, yeah. Oh, really? That's actually
completely fake. Oh, we caught your thing in
the corner right there. Oh, we got you
bringing those boxes in on the other video.
Over and over and over or the Al
Shifa breakdown, which it turns out they created
but then had to fake a hot headquarters
in that little break room, and they got
caught for it by everybody. And she went
forward with the bombing of all the schools
and the hospitals. They've been lying about everything
the whole time, and everybody knows it. And
all they can do is just keep pumping
out fake stories.
My point is that they just murdered,
depending on reports between 6 and 12 unread
teachers and drivers,
manufactured a whole story about it. It turns
out they're all provably just innocent people based
on and numerous human rights groups that broke
down who they were and what they're connected
to. Israel just made up life. Remember last
time they did this, it turned out 3
or 4 of them had been killed months
before this? And they just but they say,
we got them. We killed them in this
room. No. You lied about that. So now
all we get is this really dumb video
that, by the way, it starts like this
with a look. I mean, I
just I mean, I you can't do it
even laugh. I mean, it's it's macabre because
I'm terrible this is. But you got a
random thing,
a a
a beat up old door
with a bunch of, like, IDs and pieces
of paper with I logos, like, pinned. So
what? We're gonna pretend that they they all
stuck their IDs to the door?
So you could know that they were building
drones before you came in? I mean, do
you they don't even think this stuff through?
But they start the video like that to
make sure you see what they posted there
on the door, and then they open the
door. Oh, well, come on inside, and then
it's just this weird table.
Nothing else in this room lines up other
than the shit they excuse me. The stuff
they jammed on that table, which they've done
every time. That's it. End of story.
Breaking news. They're all caught because IDF put
out a completely unverifiable video that's been caught
lying the entire time of something that quite
frankly seems completely fabricated like they've done every
other time before.
It is embarrassing. Like, I'm embarrassed for them
if they weren't genocidal monsters.
And then of course, this guy posts this
same thing.
There is a list. You just can't come
back from that. He knew it was not
a list. He knew it was a calendar.
They just figured that you wouldn't be able
to piece together that it was Arabic that
said Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday.
He lied to you. That's it.
And now they're lying again.
Now, I just went over in this last
show the conversation of the UNRWA discussion within
this, as well as the one we'll get
to later in the show about Haiti.
But I wanna make sure we include that
so you could look back on what we
discussed, but I wanna update some more stuff
around this. Now, the bottom line is that
they killed a bunch of UNRWA teachers in
in a they they air through an airstrike.
Which they've done countless times. There's no evidence
they're Hamas, in fact there's plenty of evidence
showing that they can prove they're not. Nobody
cares.
Especially not your governments that pretend to care
about the law. Here is one of these
representatives, a UN teacher who's speaking about what
they're dealing with.
Colleagues said that they they're not wearing the
unrivast anymore because they feel that that turns
them
in in into a target. Another one said
that that morning, their children had stopped them
from coming into the shelter. They were particularly
angry by the,
the allegations that had been made
as to,
the involvement of
of their colleagues in in in, you know,
extremists and terrorists.
Now think about the point about the vest.
I mean, the bottom line is
they point to the under vest, like we've
seen, they go, well, they're Hamas because we
told you UNRA is Hamas. I mean, their
propagandist, including Israeli leaders themselves, have blatantly said
UNRA is Hamas. That's not true. It's absurdly
false.
So they take the vest off because, well,
they're gonna they're gonna see Unruh. They're gonna
shoot them. Then they go, look. They're not
wearing vest, so they're Hamas members.
They I mean, I've seen both of those
arguments from the same people making both arguments.
Because that's how flimsy this is. And anybody
honest can see that. And all the leaders
don't care.
All of the rulers, excuse me, don't care.
Activities for which they had no evidence, but
they felt that this really was a stain
on the memory of, you know, dear colleagues,
dear friends, son of one of the
the staff had brought a meal into the
to the, to the building, and they decided
whether or not to eat it in the
in the principal's office.
And then they decided that, no, they wouldn't
do it there. They'd eat it in, you
know, the storeroom or the science lab, wherever
it was. Although I actually think it was
2 classrooms, and it was, you know, they
they went there and they were eating when
the when the bomb
bomb bomb hit.
That that's how this works. I mean, they're
just murdering Palestinians, guys, every single day. Then
while we're speaking, they're killing children.
I just I, you know, I I don't
know. I I can't just stop saying I
just don't I it's one of the every
time it comes up, it's so infuriating that
we're literally sitting here watching our governments who
know this is happening, try to lie you
down from seeing it.
All of them. Everyone in this illusion of
a in this well, this selection process pretending
like they're different. Every single one of them
are allowing this to continue.
Many people around the world are. The world,
by and large, sees this. So it always
comes back to that question. You know, what
do we do in that moment?
I don't I I I just don't wanna
believe that just straight up violence will ever
achieve anything other than more violence.
I don't believe it. I don't I think
it begets violence. But the problem is that
we're in a situation where we the majority
sees this,
and we all, I will just vote for
it. Right? Just wait. Give it another couple
of months until we have an elect yeah.
Just let them keep murdering and genociding
until we figure it out. And then we
can elect somebody who can go, we'll keep
doing this till we figure it out.
What do what do we do right there?
How do we actually get this to stop?
It's a fair question. Because it doesn't seem
like facts or evidence matter at all to
the people that pretend they're in power.
Or that, you know, power the the the
the the powers that shouldn't be, rather.
Avi Mayer, former editor and chief of Jewish
law post, lies about this as usual. Antonio
Gotero just simply said that these were a
school turned shelter for 1200 people was bombed,
and 6 of their colleagues were killed. That's
what he was just talking about. He responds,
but of course only tags the screenshot because
he doesn't want you engaging with people actually
saying in the conversation.
There's Twitter files for you.
Israel has confirmed the identities of 9 terrorists.
No, he's lying.
100%. And easy to hear is Ravi Abdul
from human rep met human rights group or
EuroMed human rights group.
Same thing here. Blatant lie.
We've thoroughly investigated the backgrounds of these unarmed
employees and corroborated with multiple sources that none
of them had involvement in any military activities.
Only one individual, Mohammed
ad ad non had passed ties to Hamas
many years ago, but has ceased any affiliation
with them long before the war started. And
this is the point. That's why I'm saying
that. Almost all of them in the past
were forced to work through the entity that
they created. Or, you know, it could be
that he's a military part of the military
part of it. But that's a very specific
as he talks about the Cassini brigades versus
other aspects, Robert.
Either way, the point is that this has
been I mean, the fact that it even
excites in there that, yes, one of them
did have in the past will be jumped
on by these same maniacs. The point is
they're murdering random innocent people. In fact, people
that are working in a danger in a
dangerous situation just to help people.
And the reports are here for you to
look at. The reality is these people not
only are okay with murdering innocent people because
they're Palestinian, but will go as far as
to completely fabricate lies to justify that, which
means that they know that you know it's
wrong. They probably don't care, but they know
you know. That's why they have to feed
you a lie about why they did it.
Same thing. This is the
Israel the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations
openly lying about this. How surprising, he says,
that it turns the under workers were killed
yesterday. He's lying. Same thing. Blatant absolute lie.
Here's what Elon Lev Elon Levy said, just
showing you that they can't even here's what's
hilarious about this. You know how often I
point out how they can't just take like,
let's just even say their propaganda's working.
They don't just come out and say, like
we said before, no. No. We're we're giving
them enough food.
They're lying about that. No no no. They
have to go over the top and say
not only are they not starving, they're swimming
in food.
They're they're living in abundance everywhere. And, my
point in saying that is that it think
about how absurd like, it's almost like that
they're enjoying making it into a cartoon.
If you were just to say, no. No.
We're giving them enough. We're feeding them. They're
lying about it. You could get away with
that lie. People would accept that lie. When
you come out and say that they're not
only not starving, they've got so much food.
It's crazy. And then you show all these
children starving in the streets, or you show
their their places they claim they're getting food
from that are bombed 4 months ago.
It's like they want you to see it.
So the same thing here.
They could get away with the argument saying
they're Hamas because people who are out there
don't care will just accept their narratives. But
here's how far he goes.
Philip Lazzarini from UNRWA simply goes endless and
senseless killing day after day, which he's right.
After another school sheltering displaced people hit Nusserat
today, how many times they bombed Nusserat? It's
unreal.
Among the people killed, 6 UNRWA. Since the
beginning of the war, at least 220 UNRWA
staff have been killed. Imagine 220 UN workers
in any other dynamic.
Any of them. When the first one happened
in this conversation, people were hushed about it.
Israel was trying to avoid the conversation, and
then finally, just started going, well, they're Hamas,
and then the US government followed suit.
He follows up and he says, name them.
I dare you.
Elon Levy.
Israel has repeatedly asked, I'm gonna offer a
list of aid workers allegedly killed in Gaza.
No, no. They've gotten them. They've shared it.
They've been publicized. It's been talked about a
1000 times. You absolute moron. And he says,
so it can confirm what are indeed a
mass terrorist.
Unruh's refusing. That's not true. And that's it's
painful how much he lies about this. And
that you can easily prove it, as everyone
down below is doing.
And as Muhammad Shahada says,
they've been named
repeatedly.
You in Israel never showed any evidence to
prove any of them had engaged in any
militant activities.
All you did was name drop yelling, hamas,
hamas, hamas. Trust me.
And I agree, it only makes you look
desperate. The point is, they've they've been released
already. Their names, their photos, they've been discussed
broadly in the conversation. And he jumps in
and goes, name them. You can't even name
them.
You know why? Because somebody will come along
this who's not
really immersed in it and go, wow.
Yeah. They're lie I mean, so that's the
it's you're in a position where the world
sees you and you're all you can do
is cobble together outright lies that it takes
half a second to prove in hopes that
you win over one uninformed person?
How much more do you need to see
to not to realize how flimsy this they're
failing. They have lost already. I wrote that
article or the the show the 1st week
of this. I said Israel has already lost
the war.
I wasn't predicting. I could it was just
clear to me how that this was the
end of what they were doing, and it
was their fault.
Their narratives were falling apart. People were seeing
through it. Now you've got morons like this
coming out and just blatantly going like Eva
Eva Klompas.
They've returned down nope. Didn't even happen.
But you don't care or you don't know,
that's pretty pathetic. I mean, this is a
very pathetic person in general.
David Miller highlights what we covered before about
an actual breakdown con like, the the evidence
is over is overwhelming. IDF apparently has been
targeting, specifically,
a meeting of teachers. It's happened more than
once now. And as many have shown you,
they're going after infrastructure. They're going after things
that keep Palestinian life in in, you know,
functioning.
Whether it's teachers or schools. I mean, one
of the things we talked about, they were
gathering together in a in a group, we
already covered this, to discuss how they can
have some semblance of school for children. They
got wind of that? They bombed them.
David Miller says they targeted teachers deliberately. Just
like they targeted journalists, as we all know.
Utility workers, university staff, mosques, schools, water, sewage
facilities, bakeries, and all other means of life
in Gaza. They want to destroy all of
Gaza, build beachfront apartments as we've already heard
them discuss.
Trouble is, the resistance is not defeated and
cannot be defeated.
True.
Bottom line though is they're gonna keep lying
about it. And keep murdering children, keep starving
people,
keep creating disease, and your governments are gonna
keep nodding along.
Unless you do something.
Vivid, another Israeli propagandist,
says 2 Hamas terrorists were sent to hell
by Israeli air force in Rafa. Good riddance.
Here's the point about the reactive propaganda we're
always making. They're always discussing. It really is
all they have. It's pathetic. I mean, I
don't know why they can't recognize that and
just start pumping out other like, get ahead
of it. Might work for you. Instead, all
they do is wait for you to point
out one of their murders and they go,
wait. Here's what actually happened. And it's so
easy to prove they're lying.
So this one was something that got leaked
out. The point is, these are and you
could there it's not just the comments below.
You can find this video all over the
place. The bottom line is these people are
walking I mean, look it for yourself. These
are 2 random people walking down the street
in Rafa. And the point is somebody got
all this from a drone that they captured,
put this out to show you, look, they're
killing innocent people. So what do they do?
This random Zionist propagandist grabs it and just
gives you a narrative. We got them. It's
the same thing they've done 14 times. We
got the kid with a with a bar
nope. That was a bike. Remember we talked
about that too? It's a it's a rocket
launcher that what's it what's his name? Hananyin
Avtali.
Literally personally added a fake red line around
it to make it look like a rocket
launcher until it was proven by corporate media
and everyone else included that it was a
kid on a bike. Nobody cared about that.
Just went forward.
Point same point here. You can see clearly
these people walking down the street. They don't
have guns in their arm, doesn't matter. But
that's why they shared it originally. Because look,
they're killing innocent people, and all they can
do is just go, we got them. Kill
them all. And people share it and don't
care.
Here is what's actually happening.
Her name is Aseel.
They dropped a 1 ton bomb on her
family home.
And this is what she's dealing with now.
Is she a home office member?
At what point do we just you know,
the idea well, correct collateral damage.
Nobody should be okay with this. Nobody should
stand by and pretend. And and I'm frankly,
let's realize this is
look. I mean, this she's alive. Thank god.
One child is killed every 10 minutes. It's
probably way more than that. But that's what
we can prove. One child is killed every
10 minutes, and we're supposed to pretend like
that makes sense?
Based on what? That they've rescued 8 people,
in fact, half they stumbled across, and I
think the other ones are lucky to be
alive? Killing a 149, if not more? Hannibal
directive on October 7th? Shooting their own people?
Raping and torturing people that they, arrest be
whether or not they're Hamas, if they even
have I mean, it's incredible
what these people are allowing.
This is their legacy.
This will not go away, whether or not
they're ever held accountable.
And the point is that the Israeli
people
are calling it out.
Yet another report.
This is mariev.co,
Israeli Media, talking about the specifically highlighting the
chief of staff, but simply saying, where was
the army on on October 7th? Now a
dramatic detail has been revealed about the chief
of staff.
IDF officials
acknowledge that senior officials at the general staff
are working to prevent the summary of October
7th investigation in an attempt to prevent the
truth from being revealed. Now we already found
out that they wouldn't give the the in
the testimonies of soldiers to the US for
their investigation, only which the u the the
only reason we know that is because somebody
else leaked that. The US government wasn't complaining.
They weren't going you're hiding information. They just
didn't care.
Then it got shown, and now they're on
the hook to pretend why they didn't want
mind that Israel's giving them half information.
You know why. The important part here is
what,
Nick here highlights. Or excuse me, not Nick,
but the 12 ball highlights.
On the morning of October 7th, before the
incursion started, some officers in the IDF purportedly
attempted to move troops to the Gaza envelope
because Hamas was clearly preparing to attack.
But senior command
refused.
Think about that.
I just it's it's so
This is one of these conversations that we've
talked about, and the art It's all right
here. You have to translate it with your
whatever translator, but this this is
this is the,
hold on.
I Oh, what time we have? It it's
always hard to translations.
We just grab this.
Because it it depending on what what,
app used to translate different words or, you
know, use I was trying to search for
it really quickly. I was reading it earlier.
IDF,
officials acknowledge the senior officials and general staff
are working to prevent the summaries we already
told you. The IDF at a severe low
point relation and that's important to realize too,
they are. The the their own population just
barely supports what they're doing.
In the Gaza, envelope, the the level of
trust is extremely low.
They're not the the commands are not straightforward.
The spread of information on social networks today,
the IDF is conducting an internal investigation to
discover the source of the leak of the
6 kidnappers who were rescued, which continues to
happen. The information gets leaked out, they don't
want people to see.
IDF spokesman, Danfiri. The good decent man, the
fierce warrior, hardly. He's a complete liar. He's
been caught 14 times already.
Here we go. IDF, acknowledge general war is
underway and the events of October 7th, the
tensions between the senior officer and interim command
regarding the division of blame and actions. There
are reports that indicate the chief of staff,
Haley, was hunting
in the position of a military officer and
refrained from carrying out organizing operations to the
attack, say it's a different translation, so as
to not reveal intelligence capabilities and sources. Although
he was sufficient there was sufficient intelligence information
about Hamas' intention to carry a defensive action.
Same pro point. They knew they there was
enough intelligence to suggest that Hamas was doing
something
and, for whatever reason, didn't allow them to
take action.
This version receives external reinforcement from phone calls
between Gaza Brigadier General Abi Rosenfield and the
commander of the naval base in Ashdod,
where they sought to take troops to the
sea and said something was happening in Gaza.
I officials said Rosenfield hinted at this
call that he had no permission to move
forces.
That's crazy.
The fact and you're not gonna hear about
this in from US officials. Let's put it
that way. Who knows if they're gonna shift
in his in US or media in some
cases and cover this? But that's incredible.
So, again,
they chose
not
to send people. Now with all of the
other things we have, with all the evidence
we have of foreknowledge of the people on
those booths and everything else, I don't know
how you ignore this. That in some case,
there there were some allowance of this.
And then the Hannibal directive. I mean, it's
hard not to see how this might have
been a manufacturing effort with the, you know,
the sacrificial lambs, if you will, being the
Jewish population.
It's crazy.
Let's see.
Let me double check something really fast.
Oh, that's right. That's right. Okay. So going
forward,
he also puts this out just to threads
you can read for yourself about the more
information.
Israel secured plans for all acts of flood
over a year ago.
Israel disarmed Gaza border towns. They did. They've
they've removed, you know, basically, in some cases
where these peep they like, essentially, the moving
of the of the concert itself, the removal
of of the ability to defend themselves, the
ignoring of what was going on beforehand, Hamas
openly training along the border. Israel knew prior
on attack from other governments. Egypt warned them.
IDF triggered Hannibal maximized Israeli deaths. Those are
all facts.
Israelis should be outraged. Now electronic at the
final, there's a follow-up to this in regard
to there's an 11 minute video you can
watch about the allies on October 7th. The
simple point to take away from this, watch
the video. They do a great job and
here's the article we're discussing. Israeli forces accused
of killing their own citizens. That's from,
Australian media, hand held directive, which we all
should know by now.
The point is, on October 7th, acknowledgments of
battles and a and a tank fired at
the Nova Festival from the IDF side. Well,
obviously, they don't have tanks from the mosque.
In small print, this in Zionist media, they
reported this. Are those surviving? And he's asking,
are those people that, survivors, they stole a
dental hospital? I I I'm unable to find
that out.
We did have that report, by the way.
See, it'll still come up.
Maybe not.
Yeah. Not anymore.
There it is. Got it.
Always involuntary. That's what made it come up
last time. So this is still an important
part of the story. I just don't know
what happened to them after the fact. The
point was that on right afterward, a few
days afterward, the music, the music festival massacre
survivors, the the nova peep the people at
the festival
were involuntarily
committed
due to mental breakdowns apparently.
Or, you know, now with everything else we
know, maybe they know something. I mean, that
shouldn't be that hard to wrap your mind
around right now. That is pretty crazy.
Talked about that
months months months ago.
Now, Yoda Sarawy, just add a few points
to this segment.
Has a great video here that I think
you should watch.
No vaccine will help cause anymore. It's terminally
ill, they say. And our task is to
disconnect it from life support. The sooner the
better.
This this important, he says. We share footage
reported for the first time that reveal the
soldiers who blew up the university. Remember all
the lies they sold about what that was?
No. It was controlled demolition because they don't
want people in Gaza having any of these
things. Now, Eunice Sarawy doing the great work
he's been doing, breaking this down. They're and
it's like this is the point of the
of the evoclapus and the rest acting like
there's no evidence of genocide. These people are
literally documenting in real time all of these
crimes, laughing about it because they feel they've
got impunity.
I want I really hope that they're wrong.
Can I grab maybe I didn't grab this?
Well, you know what? Let me see. I'll
I'll play a little bit of it. I
wanna I'm I'm gonna make sure we don't
go as long as usual on the show
today.
Here is
this clip. I'm just gonna play a couple
minutes of it, and I'm gonna jump into
the next segment.
I thought I'd grab this.
Here we go.
Alright.
December 7th 2023,
approximately 16:15
local Jerusalem time. The Israeli military blew up
the Al Azhar University campus in Southern Gaza
City,
reducing the university
to rubble.
Our investigation
reveals the names behind the war crime.
No channels or military assets were reported found
by Israeli military at the university.
1 of the officers involved
described the mission as, I quote,
rigging one of the symbols
of Gaza's future, the Azhar University
in the northern part of the strip,
and blowing it up.
The incident was ordered by people fled. The
Israeli commander from Ukrainian origin of the combat
engineering corps of the 7th 149 battalion.
The 3 buildings of the university campus
were blown up at approximately
16:15
local Jerusalem time. Woah.
David Zaunton.
David was the officer who signed off on
the shipment of mines and participated in planting
explosives
in the university.
He's a journalist at the local Israeli website.
Now, you can see exactly why Yiran Srawi
is being used in a good way in
regard to the ICJ. I see, like, they're
using his data in his videos because he's
wildly detail oriented. And he he I mean,
he's breaking all this down. And he was
what's hilariously stupid about it, he's grabbing the
stuff from their TikToks and they're and they
must see this. They just don't think they're
gonna be held accountable for it. And what's
he's he's overlapping this with foreign entities from
different countries working with Israel.
All of these are
one of these events alone
can put people in prison.
Let alone build a clear
case showing genocide.
And this is why his work is so
important because this is undeniable.
Zoldan, before the explosion,
wrote in his personal Facebook account. Golden student,
you could have been a doctor of nuclear
physics. You could have studied philosophy in your
5th year. And now, what now? Nails and
feathers and destruction of dreams.
Zaldan has been holding other operations in Gaza,
including a recent demolition of a mosque over
2 days ago.
Wow.
Wow. And this company was sent back to
Gaza in the past tense.
And don't forget what Scott Ritter pointed out.
Right? So the idea that they were able
to put to control demolition in these buildings
proves that what they're doing is a war
crime. The only reason they would be doing
this, they argue, is that they're going after
Hamas. Right? And that they wouldn't they could
go in there and just go after Hamas,
but they're bombing because they claim that they're
like, they the narrative is that they have
to bomb these areas because Hamas and human
shields and so on. Right?
But they're controlled demolition, which means they went
into the building, they confirmed that there was
no presence, placed demolition, and then walked away
and then exploded it. That's a war crime.
That's destroying infrastructure for the sake of destroying
infrastructure. That's what they're doing. They're laughing about
it. They're commenting about it. Israel is giving
accommodations for it. I mean, it's ins absurd.
Your governments come out and go, you're lying
or you're racist or we'll investigate and we'll
follow-up.
Nothing happens.
Same point. Ask yourself how that's possible. What
are they doing to allow these people to
act against their own interests?
On September 12th, he writes on his social
media accounts
referring to the polio virus outbreak and hepatitis
epidemics in the Gaza Strip.
We are being vaccinated against the rampant polio
and hepatitis epidemics in Gaza,
but no vaccine will help Gaza anymore.
He's terminally ill. Now our task is disconnected
from life support. The sooner, the better.
Before the explosion of the university,
Zalzan commanded Nvivio.
Man.
Maya,
another female soldier, filmed the explosion and uploaded
it to her social media,
cashing it goodbye to higher education in Gaza.
She's one of 27 other Israeli soldiers
in the company that was involved in blowing
up of the Asar University campus.
That also included
US citizens like Roey Weix,
who were involved in planning explosives that led
to destruction of the institution.
The devastation left indeed behind shattered dreams as
the soldiers say more than just buildings.
It crushed the aspirations
and future of thousands of guards and students
hoping to complete their educational
career.
See that? The playdough.
Right? You mean control demolition? Yeah. Exactly.
If there was any justice in this world
I mean, for crying out loud,
it's all right in front of you.
I mean, the ICC and the ICJ are
doing something.
We'll see what actually happens.
Just destroying the lives of average people.
Good times.
And then breaking news.
Hamas had a military base under the US's
liberty, so I guess they had to bomb
it. I just saw that as I was
skimming a second ago, thought that was funny.
But You know, it's the same old dumb
narrative as everything else. I mean, the point
is it doesn't make sense. That's the point
of this.
They they'll just go Hamas and tunnels.
You know, where is the I mean, there
are the honest the the out the Francesca
Albanese out there who are at least in
this conversation,
incessantly
calling out the facts.
Where's the structure around her that's supposed to
care? You know I don't have any faith
in the UN body. At the end of
the day,
it's amazing that this many people can openly
defy and actively ignore open genocide.
I mean, my point is not that I
ever thought they were good people, but the
fact that they can just they the point
is that they know we see that they
don't do something. That is incredible to me.
That is where I come back to the
point about what is Stewie. Like, that's gonna
hurt their career. That's gonna hurt what they
can do. That's gonna hurt their power over
us for the interest of a foreign country.
How is that possible? What do they have
over these people?
I don't know. I mean, I probably just
find it logically hard to believe that somebody
could act so against their own interest for
an other entity.
Now Khaleesi just highlights that in a general
sense going off that video, here's another video
on 14th, Israeli forces armed and in full
uniform
fill themselves
storming a hospital in the West Bank. We're
gonna get into that next. The West Bank,
guys. A hospital?
Yeah. That's happening all over the place. They're
holding people
at gunpoint blindfolded outside of hot won't let
people go into the hospitals. This is supposed
to be Israel proper. This is not supposed
to be a Gaza open air prison or
however they frame it. This is supposed to
be an area that, the good Palestinians were
told. The ones that at least have some
overlapping citizenship are those that allow that can
function as nope.
Just suddenly no longer. We're just gonna go
after all the West Bank because we don't
want Palestinians here.
There's no way to misunderstand this overlap.
West Bank is not Gaza. I know they
love to play on the ignorance of the
average person, but they were the ones telling
us these two things were different. Now they're
just changing direction. And largely, Robert argues, because
they know they cannot
actually
do what they're trying to accomplish in Gaza.
So they're gonna shift over to the West
Bank where there's far I mean, if not
if any, real mil resistance presence and just
gonna wipe these people out and go, we
did it. We won. That's what he thinks
is happening. They're gonna use the destruction of
the West Bank to make it look like
they have as a military success because they're
gonna lose in every other facet, it seems.
How disgusting that must be if that's the
case. That you're gonna murder all these people
for you just so you cannot be embarrassed?
Too late.
But we can also stop them from killing
all these people.
But this is how absurd this is. Like
I said, with Yvonne Levy and the rest
of them, or Yvonne Levy, here's Israel Katz,
minister of foreign affairs, just stating a outright
lie? I mean, like, just such a complete
fairy tale.
He this is on the it's for today.
He says, well, today, we mark 4 years
since the Abraham Accords.
You mean that completely defunct thing that was
forcing Arab lead rulers
to
ignore their own interests and their own people's
desires and and make a deal with Israel?
Yeah. That's what they they forced Egypt to
do. Their people are famously anti Israel. And,
I mean, Saudi Arabia, they just said, no.
They're not gonna do it now because of
all the other thing. It's crazy to me
that he can put that forward first as
some kind of model. We, we did it
4 years. We Abraham Accords.
Also, I mean, even with the Sudan, I
make the point every time. The only thing
that happened was they exposed their game.
The Sudan was called a state sponsor of
terrorism by the United States government.
There nothing changed in regard to what they
were pointing at.
Then suddenly, they go, hey. If you you
normalize with Israel, we'll take you off the
list. It was an open conversation.
So, oh, what did that show you? The
only two things it showed you, or only
possible two things, was that they were either
terrorists, like they said they were, and that
they just didn't care about that as long
as they worked with Israel and were on
their side, which actually lines up with everything
else they do, Or they were never terrorists,
and they lied about that in order to
pressure them to organize with it, which also
lines up. Either way, you can't pretend like
I mean, they're they called them terrorists, then
they're willing to work with them. So one
of those things exist. There's only 2 possibilities.
So that's what the Abraham Accords were. Showing
that they were working with terrorism or that
they didn't care about it, and all they
were doing was coercing these governments into a
secondary passive position to whatever Israel wanted. It
says historic agreements, he claims, that reflect a
shared destiny
and have positively transformed the Middle East politically
in security, economic
is he is he having a stroke? I
mean, what are we talking about here? You're
literally in the middle of a genocide. The
world is talking about how we're about to
enter World War 3, and you're going, look
how great it is. The Middle East has
been transformed into this utopia that we all
thought we could do.
This is my I mean, does he not
think this I mean, this is the point.
You can come out and say, here is
what we've actually accomplished. Instead, you make up
a fairy tale about how you've changed the
world.
I'm I mean, you get I don't understand
the the way that they see their propaganda.
It's embarrassing. The Abraham Accords have made peace
in the region a reality.
I mean, do I even need to go
further? I mean, we should be making fun
of these people. They're just trying to set
a narrative that they want you to think.
Completely independent of fact. You know what? And
may that's the world they're trying to build.
That's the world we're gonna talk about net
in the in the second part of the
show. The memeification of everything where we're literally
fax policy, it doesn't even matter really. It's
just it's just it's boiled down to some
kind of an image or an idea or
a logo. And I pick him because I
like this side. Has nothing to do with
anything anymore. These people are just trying to
make that world a reality because then they
have ultimate control.
Now, today,
they're killing children, just like I keep telling
you. Literally as we're speaking, they're bombing children,
they're killing people, they're starving everybody, they're causing
disease, they're raping and torturing and burning things
down right now.
Every single one of the things I just
said are absolutely verifiable.
Times of Gaza. Number of children injured in
an Israeli stir strike targeting a house in
Al Nusrat camp. Again.
We we mentioned one before. This is today.
This is another one.
Cuts News Network highlights that government field assessment
teams have reported that 74%
of displaced people's tents in Gaza are now
simply unusable.
You know, those tents that were cobbled together
with extra pieces of everything? No wonder.
That have they're they're basically boiling them to
death in the middle of the summer heat.
Now, even those, 74% of those aren't even
functional anymore.
They're not giving them anything. They're not helping.
They're denying everything coming through. People are starving
to death. As even The Guardian just wrote,
a million people are currently suffering because they
will not like, in regard to, like, acute
famine, because they will not let anything in.
That story just kinda dropped off the map.
We're worried about other things. No. They're still
starving everybody. They're still shooting at aid workers.
Ask WCK. Ask Doctors Without Borders. They're screaming
about it. Nobody cares. You know, international law.
Right?
Out of a 135,000
tents, a 100,000 need immediate replacement due to
severe deterioration from intense heat over 11 months
of displacement.
Now when I say nobody cares, obviously I'm
speaking about the power structure. You care. I
care. Most people in the world care. To
make that clear. I I mean, I should
always make that more clear. You got I
made that clear in the beginning, I feel.
That we're talking about the fact that the
people that have the ability to stand up
and do, you can't have weapons. We're gonna
sanction you. They don't care.
We need to make clear be that be
very clear about that. Now, let's talk about
the West Bank and Gaza.
This is important to understand how this has
shifted. As the WikiLeaks just pointed out, new
evidence shows how 2 organizations
with close ties to the Israeli state provide
money and land used to set up new
illegal settler outposts in the West Bank. Extremist
settlers rapidly seizing West Bank land. This is
not a new story.
It's just that at post October 7th, it
has
exploded.
I mean, you could even argue that that
could just be a a bib a secondary
taking advantage of the situation. But you could
argue that it was part of this whole
thing.
The expansion of what they're doing. I mean,
it it's crazy to see how all this
is I mean, at least at the moment,
despite the like, I'll also put it this
way. In regard to occupation of Palestine, this
seems to continue to work for them. More
so in the area, but not I mean,
I shouldn't even say that. It's not successful.
But they've taken more territory at the very
least.
My but overall, they're failed. Their economy's collapsing.
Their own people are, are are literally protesting
in the streets.
They're still going though, and they they're these
governments are still blindly supporting it. And they
the point is the US government, the UK,
all of them say this is illegal, and
they just do it right in plain daylight.
And on top of that, they've made these
settlers official. They've given them guns, they claim
they're part of the official capacity in some
kind of military extent,
and those people are then raping. And I
mean literally raping people.
Literally burning people alive, stealing homes,
beating people up, stabbing, shooting.
I'll include this one for you. Robert wrote
about this. Now watch about a month ago.
And this goes well before this, we've talked
about Ollie,
that horrifying discussion about Ollie on the grill.
This is Times of Israel. Jewish extremist taunt,
Ollie's on the grill at their family.
So these peep these these West Bank settlers
burned to death a toddler. Then when the
family comes to deal with this in this,
setting, I think it's an accord or something,
there's chanting. Ollie's on the grill laughing and
dancing around.
I've covered this so many times.
That's well before October 7th. So, yeah. Totally
started after October 7th. Right? That's him right
there, sadly enough. That's the house he was
burned alive in. The point is that well
past October 7th, Israeli settlers consistently use arson
attacks to burn Palestinians
alive. It is the reality.
And yet,
rules based order. Right?
Add that for you.
So, we we talked about this in a
couple of recent articles. Israel Israel invades West
Bank. I mean, and this was legitimate. This
is not some this is an actual photo
of, like, stormtroopers,
Israeli soldiers marching in. It's not the first
time this has happened. But it's I I
mean, it's it's unprecedented, and I argue the
context of what's going on.
I I really think that. But overall, they've
they've had these incursions into West Bank before,
and it's always ended in blood and I
mean, just horrible things. Always at the expense
of the Palestinian people.
Israel launches a war on the northern west
bank. Robert followed up on the 5th to
talk about what's going on here.
And and they're literally calling this self defense,
which I just can't believe. How are you
pretending invading the west bank is self defense?
I mean, just please, anybody. I mean, I
don't even there's I don't think there's anybody
can give you an answer despite them just
claiming there's Hamas stuff going on.
Oh, so the same old false narrative from
over here? Got it. That's what's happening.
Middle East monitor. In this is this Gaza
or the West Bank?
In a a 7 day Israeli military operation,
mind you, this was at the 4th September.
It's still going.
Ingenin, in the op you know, West Bank
has destroyed 70% of the roads. Okay. So
why are you destroying the roads? Is are
they Hamas tunnel roads?
I don't understand. Yeah. Well, clearly we do
understand. They're destroying the roads because they're destroying
Palestinian
life.
That's it.
And I grabbed this just so you could
see how many I mean, it's all over
the place. Look at them. Just destroying the
middle of these areas.
This is just a quick search for that,
and it goes on and on and on,
destroying roads all over the West Bank.
Franchesca Albany says the widespread devastation and massacres
of the Israeli army in Jenin and other
parts of the, of the Israeli army, excuse
me, by them in Jenin and other parts
of the occupied Northern West Bank, where Hamas
is not ruling,
are a powerful reminder that Hamas is just
the last excuse for the state of Israel
to wreak direct the Palestinian territory havoc, to
wreak havoc on Palestine.
Everywhere for 57 years, Israel has made life
impossible for Palestinians under a brutal military occupation,
apartheid state I add, seeking to realize
a greater Israel. I mean, she sees it,
guys. These are all facts. Greater Israel's up
there. It's a conspiracy theory. No. It is
literally a patch on their arms. It's literally
on their podiums. It is literally something that
Ben Gavir and Smokers have been screaming about.
But apparently, it's all racist if you talk
about it. In agreement with the pa Palestinians
in the occupied territories, an international protection presence
must be immediately deployed to stop the But
it won't.
Because the United States government and the other
powerful western rulers
will drag their feet.
Because they're disgusting.
Adam points this out. It's worth watching this
play.
This
is in the West Bank, guys.
Long before October 7th. Okay? So the point
is this is a random Palestinian truck driver.
Now whatever let me just make up the
worst story in your mind about what you
think just happened. The point is we're supposed
to pretend this is a democracy. Right? We're
supposed to pretend that they have rights. Correct?
Well, and you you this might as well
be in the United States.
With some with some area where the police
think they can get away with it. So
the point is it's not new. But realize
that this is
the opposite of what we're told, and this
get and the reality is this is impunity.
They do this in plain daylight in front
of everybody. They don't care. They'll shoot this
guy if they want to and get away
with it.
And
the point see, the point is the guy
is not resisting. He's not fighting back. He's
leaning over him, and the guy knees him
in the stomach. This is straight up hatred.
This is punishing this guy because he doesn't
like him.
See? I mean, again, it doesn't matter. You
could maybe he's gotta read and not like
him. The point is that's not what we're
supposed to pretend this looks like.
And it it goes on for another 3
minutes or so. You get the point.
Asal Rad points out what the doctors without
borders are telling you. There's a video of
her speaking right here. She has nothing to
see here, just doctors without borders telling you
Israel's obstructing health care and targeting ambulances in
the West Bank, like every other time. This
is part of what's happening in Gaza because
of an assault on Palestinian life. So now
in the West Bank, they're calling this out.
How is this still happening?
The scale and intensity of Israel's 4 day
incursion in Jenin is very alarming, doctors without
borders say. And they've as far as I
could tell, they've never tried to argue that
they are Hamas.
So what's going on? Israeli forces keep obstructing
access to health facilities, blocking and even targeting
ambulances. So are we still pretending they're not
doing that in Gaza then? We're pretending this
is some kind of a propaganda
story? Clearly not. There's less justification for it
here, if at all. So we know what's
happening over there because we can see it
and they're lying about it. But yet, we're
gonna get pushed back from people calling you
racist for even pointing it out. Here is
one of these people talking about it. It's
telling you what's going on.
The 28th August, massive military incursions have been
going on in Jenin and Tokayam in the
occupied West Bank. These incursions are part of
a wider pattern of violence that we see
in the West Bank and East Jerusalem,
where since the 7th October, over 650
Palestinians have been killed. What we are particularly
concerned about is the obstruction of access to
health care for patients.
This includes ambulances being searched as they access
the hospital,
military view Okay. So where are the rights
here?
Is it so they just get to declare
this is a zone now and we just
do what we want? Like, this is not
so all that shows you is that these
people do not live in the world we've
been told they do.
There's not so there's where's the legal justification
here? I thought this was a democracy. Do
these people have rights? Aren't they allowed to
go to the hospital? Isn't the ambulance supposed
to have some special yes.
We all pretend that's the case. It's supposed
to be the case in Gazzi 2. They
don't care. They're showing you just like the
videos of them exploding buildings
and Lavender and Hasbora and these claim the
the provable realities of what their own media
have shown you. They're murdering people in their
homes. They're assassinating them just to kill them.
They're shooting children in the face. It's all
over this. That are placed in front of
the hospitals
as well as attacks on paramedics and medical
volunteers, including people trained by MSF. As MSF,
at this moment, we are limited in the
direct support we can provide as the insecurities
heavily restricting our movements.
What we call for is unobstructed access to
health care for all patients and an end
to the fear and violence for the population.
Yeah. That's supposed to be a crime. No.
M m s f, that's Doctors Without Borders.
Ever she it's open crime. What she's saying
is, would they need to stop breaking the
law?
And instead of people jumping up, absolutely.
I thought they were following the law. No.
You get the people to jump in and
give you some kind of a rationale about
why them breaking the law suddenly doesn't matter
right now. That's all you get.
Which is why this is so upsetting for
people. It should be.
Wyatt Reid points out, in regard to the
West Bank, Israeli settlers are openly bragging about
their massive territories in the West Bank that
they're currently stealing just since October 7th, with
the army's help, of course. Previously, quote, the
Arabs were walking around freely in the nearby
fields and orchards. And we looked at them,
and we went crazy with jealousy, he says.
It's all right here on video. He openly
talks about it.
And he says, now all the fields and
all the greenhouses around us are considered a
closed military zone for Arabs.
See how that works? So we like your
land. We want that land. So now it's
military. So you have to leave. And if
you don't, we'll beat you up, maybe shoot
you. But you have to destroy your things
before you go. Literally or you have to
pay us to destroy your house. That's what
happens every time. And it's probably happened to
these people 5 times already in their life.
That's that's freedom and democracy and liberty, according
to Israel, for Arabs.
Not pal not Hamas, mind you. Just Arab
Palestinians.
Or any Palestinian general.
Now they're military zones. Since then and of
course, that's until they turn into a swimming
pool and a park for only Israeli Jews.
Now since then it says we have the
right and obligation, he says, to go out
to these fields to show our presence and
to get to know these amazing actual treasures.
Think about this how gross these people are.
Not Israelis or Jews or whatever you wanna
pretend I just meant, but people who think
like this. The idea that you can stand
there and act like this is normal.
Now we have to be there to enjoy
this lovely field that you just basically murdered
a family to get.
Suddenly, he says, there's is space to walk
around.
Aside from the peep you know, comparatively to
people being jammed in tents where they're burning
alive and dying of disease. Oh, yeah. We
get to fucking
frolick in fields. And we do it, he
says, occupying the hills around us. See, they
know what they're doing.
They just think they're allowed to do it.
They've been propagandized their whole lives to think
that that's how the law works. That this
is different law though. Right? We have god
where god tells us we can steal this
and we can kill them if we want.
Because we're the ones this is what they're
being taught.
That does not mean that every Jew in
the world feels this way. This is Zionism.
He says in lookout points and picnic tables,
we put out the flag with pride. At
the same time, around the settlement, a new
fence is being built which makes the official
settlement
area more than twice the size.
So not only did you take their area,
you took other area to make it bigger
for yourself. It says the field and the
nature I was so attracted to just opened
up from front of me that I could
never imagine. Yeah. Just like it's magic. Right?
Magic and murder and ethic cleansing and destabilization
and, you know,
a number of other horrible things you're doing
to be able to magically make this work.
It really should make you feel sick. That
is this is disgusting.
Alan McLeod, here at BBC, families leave
Janine Camp.
You know, the ones he's talking about. Yeah.
They just chose to leave apparently. No. They
were forced out by gunpoint. That's what he
says. This in this textbook case of ethnic
cleansing, this is how the BBC describes it.
Mary and bug Mary this oh, this one
I met, Mary and Barghutti, same thing. Families
leave the West Bank.
They were literally forced out of their homes
at gunpoint and then had their homes bombed
as they watched.
She's like, no. I was there and spoke
with and still speaking with the families.
BBC World is intentionally manipulating their coverage to
misinform your audience. They just chose to leave.
It's grotesque.
Now Maryam Bogudi says, I have confirmed and
corroborated the Israeli army is detaining minors,
children, in Jenin refugee camps. Nothing new, guys.
It's going on all over the place. They've
got hundreds of children in their prisons with
no charge indefinitely
right now. 100 of them.
But we'll we'll all
I'm just so tired of having to make
the case. It's so obvious I shouldn't have
to go. This is why that matters. Yes.
It's frustrating.
The bottom line is we peed these people
will scream about the smallest an allegation
that has to do with the people that
they want you to look at. But you
can have 100 of children. There's no rationale
that suddenly makes that make sense. With no
charge, what democracy?
And using Palestinians as human shields. She has
confirmed this and corroborated it with the Israeli
army.
And you I've proven you this 45 times
over.
Using them in their own offensives against the
camps themselves.
And Israeli the Israeli regime, she says, and
its army are using automatic weapons and firing
live ammunition
recklessly
in a in in inner intentional way of
what they are calling a sweeping operation,
which means destroying everything in their path.
Which is just crazy.
I'll include my human shields discussion about the
open secret,
which it is, called the neighbor procedure, very
open.
Same with the organ trafficking, it's very open
public conversation, we're just not supposed to talk
about it.
Now here's what's interesting. Emily Schrader,
that that sociopath working for the Zionist says,
I thought you liked human shields, Miriam. You're
always shilling for the champions of human shields,
Samos. Why stop now?
And then she thought she was being super
clever. Right? Do you get what she just
did right there? And I said, oh, good
to see you're finally admitting Israel has a
policy of using human shields.
No response, of course. That's what she did.
Right? She goes, they're using human shields. And
she goes, well, I thought you supported that.
Oops.
You these are these people are bad at
propaganda. It's crazy to me. Bottom line, it's
a very open policy. It's called the neighbor
procedure as you well know, as we've covered
a 1000000 times because it's important to understand.
2013,
Palestinian children tortured,
used as shields by Israel, per the United
Nations.
Reuters.
Israeli soldiers who used Palestinian boy, a 9
year old, as human shields avoid jail.
Defense for Children International, an international human rights
group. Israel forces use 5 Palestinian children as
human shields. That's 2023.
This is from 2017.
Generally, human shields. Since the beginning of the
occupation in 1967,
Israeli security forces have repeatedly
used Palestinians in the West Bank and the
Gaza Strip as human shields. Israeli soldiers routinely
used Palestinian civilians as human shields by forcing
them to carry out life threatening tasks. It
was also following a high court petition against
this practice,
which was filed by human rights organizations
around the world in May 2002
that the IDF issued a general order
prohibiting the use of Palestinians as a means
of human shield against gunfire or attacks by
the Palestinian side. But then it goes on
to say, following the order, the use of
human shields dropped sharply.
However, the arms the army did not construe
as a human shield the use of Palestinians,
provided they consented.
The army continued the widespread use of this
practice, which they referred to as the neighbor
procedure.
Following another petition filed by human rights organizations,
the high court of justice ruled that this
practice too violated international humanitarian law, and that
this thus was illegal. And guess what they've
never stopped doing? Here is the Institute For
Middle East Understanding, the neighbor procedure, Israel's use
of Palestinian human shields from 2012.
Human Rights Watch. During military operations, Israeli soldiers
routinely coerced Palestinian civilians, including children, to perform
life endangering acts that assisted military operations, the
practice known as the neighbor procedure. Now see
this?
Unimportant.
That's just a clip. It's all very easy
to prove, guys. Countless, countless over the years
reports and verifiable stories.
And yet, today, it's like, what are you
talking about?
What do you mean neighbor procedure?
You mean every single group that we're talking
about suddenly forgot? Human Rights Watch,
Amnesty,
United Nations, Oxfam, everyone, US government. We all
know. But suddenly, just a 30 seconds goes
by and we're like, what? We have to
reconfirm the story. It's crazy. Kenneth Roth points
out Israeli forces in the occupied West Bank
return a Palestinian man dead
just an hour after attaining him, reportedly with
signs of torture. At the time of his
attention, he had been sleeping with his family
on their roof,
one after another after another. You know how
hard it is to hold him accountable for
things like this while they're literally bombing hundreds
of people from the sky? I mean, it's
the this is all falling in line.
They've got it to a place where we're
only focusing at some kind of 10,000 elevation
view here, the bigger and it's hard not
to when they're doing such law. But the
point is, in every moment, they are breaking
the law with everything they're doing. And guys,
this is the West Bank. They detain a
guy, bring him back dead.
So so much for your
rules based order and democracy here. Nobody cared
other than people like us calling this out
and Kenneth Roth. Abiir points out that who
exactly is the story is
armed Jewish settler attacks Palestinian children on the
1st day back to school. Right? So not
only do they bomb the teachers trying to
set this up, then when they actually try
to go back to school, they bomb the
children.
Or attack them, excuse me. Or when they
try to go back to school. And Avir
says exactly who exactly is the are the
armed Jewish settlers defending by attacking children?
Just a reminder that most of these settlers
are Americans born and raised.
From New York. It's most of them. It's
crazy. The point
is that they're not defending anything. They're just
attacking children. That's the point she's making. There's
no secret narrative there. They don't like Palestinians.
They're attacking them. Children and all. Mehdi Hasan
points out, so now Israeli soldiers have gone
from posting dehumanizing selfies from occupied Gaza,
as you know what's coming, to dehumanizing selfies
from occupied West Bank. Because that's just who
they are, ladies and gentlemen.
The people doing this, largely the IDF Zionist
manipulators.
There's plenty of people in the guy Israel,
IDF, the Jews, Israeli, who are calling this
out. That's important to always point out. Eunice
Rawi, Israeli soldiers from the 92nd brigdoubt battalion
took a mocking selfie with a kidnapped Palestinian
from West Bank.
You see the point? Is this Hamas now
suddenly? No. These they hate Palestinians. They're laughing
and torturing and enjoying what they're doing. It's
right there on their faces. That guy is
an innocent man from Palestine.
Period.
Nobody cares.
And let's not forget, the reason
that this has all continued to happen
because of Israeli influence over the conversation.
That's just like we're gonna see with Trump
if when he gets elected.
Trump is too desperate for Miriam Adelson's cash.
Her condition, West Bank annexation.
That's important to understand.
He but whether or not it's Trump, it's
still gonna keep happening, guys.
Here's what Kim Iverson had to say. It's
a interesting clip about a few different points
I think were important to include. She says
Israel's behavior towards the Palestinians is completely out
of control. Even pro Trump Republicans
are now turning against them. It's no wonder
why the IDF relies on bot farms to
inflate support, almost predominantly on Twitter, mind you.
Has lost the narrative.
No. But I mean, they are really they're
I I've had many conversations lately with a
lot of pro Trump
Republican voters and they are disgusted by Israel.
Israel is losing the narrative and all the
people you're seeing on social media, you know,
IDF has these, like, bot farms
that they're putting IDF soldiers in these computer
rooms and they're Hey. Just so it's clear,
they all do. The US government, China, Russia,
they all do this. But Israel has been
very prolific about it and then kinda public
like gloated about it. That's why it's very
prominent but at the same time call it
blood libel and conspiracy when you point to
it like everything else.
Having them just go on social media and
act like they're big supporters of Israel
just to try to gaslight us into believing
that they have a lot more support than
they actually do.
All right. Well, what would Trump do?
Well, I just want to share this with
you, but Trump's Israel
adviser,
this is former US ambassador to Israel David
Friedman. He wrote
Trump's Israel adviser. Make sure you hear that
when you hear what he says next.
A new book that came out. And you
know what he's advising Trump to do?
He's advising him to take $1,000,000,000
that would go to humanitarian
support for the Palestinians
and use it to quote assert and maintain
sovereignty over Judea and Samaria. That's what they
call the West Bank. They don't call it
the West Bank. They call it Judea and
Samaria.
And he says that he wants the United
States to use to redirect $1,000,000,000
from existing aid to the Palestinians, including funds
meant for the Palestinian security force to finance
annexation.
This is what they're doing right now. So
there's 3 things to talk about here. First
of all, how in the world are we
talking about taking money meant for Palestinian
anything
and saying that giving it to Israel to
control Palestinian land is somehow in the interest
of Palestine, which is what he's trying to
pretend. That's insulting more than anything else. But
ask yourself this.
How in the world are we supposed to
pretend that a $1,000,000,000
apparently sitting in something for Palestine
is just sitting there?
I thought we're being told that it's all
Hamas. They're just taking and using it and
buying weapons.
A $1,000,000,000? Now the reality is, let's be
clear, and I've said this so many times
over the years, all of this goes through
Israel.
All of the sup all all the a
Israel lies
about everything.
Israel takes this, uses it for its own.
Like, even the things they pretend are being
done for Palestinian
is not for Palestine.
It's and so this money is not I
mean, think about how crazy that is. Do
you know what a $1,000,000,000 could do for
the Palestinian people? They don't it's not the
the lies they spin about how they've tried.
It's all Hamas. Well, we can also argue
again that Hamas was put and created there
by Israel. That's a fact. So then you're
blaming yourself essentially. But either way, it's not
even the reality.
The reality is that they have
systematically
kept them in this position.
Now we're just gonna pretend that this money
sitting in some bank account somewhere is gonna
be used to take control of the West
Bank? Well, first of all, they don't need
that money to do that. They're just gonna
pretend that that's gonna that it's a way
to make it look like you're doing it
for Palestinians.
And all it amounts to is the same
lie Trump sold during the Aram accor Abraham
Accords with Israel where he said and this
is supposed to be the the deal of
the century he claimed. Or technically, I guess
it wasn't the Abraham Accords, but in that
same time frame, the deal of the century
which Robert called the steal of the century.
It was a complete
it was so flimsy.
They basically outlined the exact situation of today
and just called it a 2 state solution.
And then they could unlock all this money
and they could use that for their own
control over the very people they claim they're
giving something to. It's Orwellian in a way,
and it's just straight up insulting.
This is what Trump's I mean, I'm who
knows if Trump's gonna take the advice?
He's sort of a wild card in all
cases, but at the end of the day,
his people are telling him. Mary Maddelson is
driving him. He's giving him a $100,000,000,000
in the on the condition that she he
allows West Bank annexation. And then you got
Friedman. All these are Israeli people in his
ear, including Lumer, who we'll talk about later,
getting him to do certain things. Now maybe
he knows that. Maybe he's being threatened. I
don't know. At the end of the day,
this is all I mean, it's just just
as illegal as giving them the Golan Heights
or pretending you can move the m move
every move he made about Jerusalem, about the
Golan Heights, about I mean, everything. About West
Bank, allowance while he was president, all illegal.
Every single one of them. And now, it's
only gonna continue. Whoever gets elected, mind you.
Israeli annexation of the West Bank, which he
said will help improve the lives of Palestinians
under Israeli control. He said Actually, there's still
a lot that play right there for my
point, but that's that's make sure you hear
that. That's he's pretending, taking their money
that apparently Israel's just holding forever because it's
clearly their money. Right?
And using that to take control of West
Bank and then pretend that's for them?
I it's just I mean, look. If you
if even let's just even say for sake
of conversation that Israel taking full control of
everything would somehow work out in the bet
I mean, like, the point the point they're
trying to make is that if we if
Israel get re gets rid of Hamas, Israel
occupies, which they already do, but physically stands
and takes control of all of Gaza in
the West Bank.
That once that happens, then it will all
be okay. It'll be a one state solution,
but everybody will be okay. Everyone's got rights.
That's not what is happening in the in
it's not what would happen. Period. It's not
what happens for Ethiopian Jews. It's not what
happens for anybody other than Israeli Jew Zionists.
The bottom line is that they will not
give that to Palestinians because they're all saying
that right now. Everyone in their Knesset is
going, they're not people. They're all terrorists. So
we're gonna pretend that once you remove what
you pretend is the threat and then take
all full control that they're gonna suddenly be
allowed into your society? No. They've already said
they're gonna have to go through training and
they're gonna
all you're gonna do is effectively move these
people away like you want to. And you're
gonna take their money. You're gonna use it
to move them away and pretend like you're
helping every all you're gonna do is make
a situation where people who are willing to
fall in line and remove and forego their
rights and act as secondary citizens within a
controlled state are gonna somehow be free.
It's disgusting.
And what gets ignored?
The basic reality of Palestinian self determination.
Because it's the easiest bucket to tap into
and reposition it.
Reposition is that of the United States. So
he wants the U. S. To
force, you know, to get Israel to just
annex the West Bank and in which case
the
Palestinians would not be made civilians. They would
not be made citizens. This is the same
situation that Palestinians who are from Jerusalem.
The Palestinians living in Jerusalem when Israel annexed
it were not given
citizenship. They were never given Israeli citizenship. There
are Very important point.
So, Trump allowed that, which was illegal. There's
no He has no standing to do that.
Suddenly it changed, right? So, suddenly now that
they were they were living there. Now, suddenly
they're technically prop Israel proper even if the
action was illegal.
What she's saying is that Israel then just
continue
just never gave them citizenship.
Why not?
If your whole claim is that, you know,
we're we're helping the good Palestinians, well, what
what what's going they're already in an area
that's not Gaza. There's not Hamas presence. So
the bottom line is you just don't like
Palestinians.
It's very clear. Or millions of them and
they all live
they they actually are not citizens of any
country. They have no papers. They have no
they're stateless.
And that I think is the point. So
at some point, when you can hope, you
know, pretend that everyone's gotten sufficiently far enough
away from this to just not remember how
this all went down, or we pretend we
don't and we get propagandized from the partisanship.
And what do they do? They go, well,
they're not citizen. They can't be here.
Which is what they basically do everywhere else.
They go, well, you we need to build
a pool or a park right here. And
you don't have a permit, so you have
to move. Even though they've been applying for
permits for 50 years and been turned down
every single year because they don't wanna give
it to them. So they can eventually do
this. If you think I'm wrong, look it
up. I mean, it's about as easy as
anything else to find. It's everywhere. So now,
you have all millions of these people who
are basically like like that movie with Tom
Hanks where you're like stuck on the airport
with no citizenship.
But at what point do they get kicked
out of the airport? That's what we're dealing
with right now. They are watching this develop.
They should have given them citizenship. This is
not new. This goes back to Trump's administration.
But what happens when they take control of
the area?
You see my point? Like, there why would
they apply this any differently? This is a
good clip she put together. And I think
she's been doing good work on this in
general. And if they travel, they have to
get special permission.
And if they leave, here's where here's the
crux of it. We're because they're not citizens
of Israel, because Israel refuses to make them
citizens. If they leave,
they're not allowed to come back. Even though
they have a home, they've got possessions, they've
got I mean, you could in some cases
they still have the keys to their old
house that which was actually there before the
illegal state of Israel. And if they leave
because they weren't given citizenship even though they
were there before them, they won't be able
to come back because they don't want them
there.
So it's just a coercive tool. Now, knowing
that they're there and and sort of like
under,
you know, under the gun if you will,
I mean, technically too,
they're more
they're more willing to acquiesce to whatever Israel
wants because they know that they're under the
kind of oppressiveist here. They can just pretend
if if they dry if they do something
that gives them bad attention, Israel could just
be like, you're not a citizen. Get out.
Can't even be here. And they what are
they gonna do? The US the world doesn't
seem to care in the positions of power.
Israel will actually prevent them from coming back
to their own homes because they're not citizens.
And that's what Israel wants to do to
the Palestinians in the West Bank. Mhmm. They
wanna annex it and say, okay, we'll start
building up the infrastructure dealing with all, but
none of you will be citizens because we're
trying to push you out. And this is
a new interesting clever way, tricky way to
push you out, which is to just not
make you a citizen. And if you ever
leave the territory, we just won't let you
back in.
You'll be trapped, a prisoner. And you don't
wanna be a prisoner, right? So you just
wanna leave, just go. It'll be better for
you. And I argue more coercive, right? At
some point when they feel that it's necessary
or they have the right motivation or there's
just enough distraction,
they'll just make something happen and justify moving
them anyway. Or maybe moving them one step
away and saying, well, you gotta go over
here first because we're doing something there and
you're not a citizen. And then eventually, now
you gotta move again, which is what happens
to all of them all the time.
That's their plan.
It's a sick and twisted I mean, this
is it doesn't I there's no way to
sugarcoat it, guys. It's a sick and twisted
mentality in society
that has been allowed using fear. And let
me just tell you. Say saying that a
year ago, you know, rather I mean, maybe
like a year and a half ago,
You I mean, she even right now, I
guarantee she's get a she's getting attacked by
the Zionist and getting peep people who don't
understand that she's right attacking her for it.
But my point is a year and a
half ago, she probably lost her show. Like,
completely canceled, boycotted, do it. It's because now
it has shifted because of what they're doing.
It's no better example to show you that
the world generally
sees it. They're just trying to reconcile, kind
of like figure out how to move forward
with this. How do we keep lying in
the way that works for us? How do
we keep, you know, kind of staving off
Israel's pressure and attacks as they get more
and more weak
until we can no longer care about it?
You know what I mean? Like, it's so
the power structures are reeling with how they
deal with this. It is happening. It's slowly
falling apart.
We saw what fear would do during the
COVID pandemic. We saw how fear twisted brains
and made people insane.
Now multiply that by 75 years. We experienced
it for a few years during the COVID
pandemic, but now multiply that by 75 years
and you've got an entire society that has
been living in fear, believing that this other
group of people wants to murder them, kill
them. That'll be the holocaust all over again.
And they have been brainwashed over 75 years.
So think of COVID-nineteen
that pandemic on
incredible steroids,
like steroids time 100. Right. Where people have
been
just groomed from birth to believe
that there's safety above all,
that it is okay to rip the rights
away from other people,
to harm other people, to infringe on other
people, to limit other people,
to squash other people. And even if you
have to kill other people for your safety,
it's okay.
And we saw a glimpse of that during
the COVID 19 pandemic. Didn't we? We saw
a glimpse of How about this guys? How
about we see it every single day in
the way our government manipulates people or, you
know, increasingly failing. But over the years, I
mean, peak of like the war on terror
was when we saw the same thing, where
it didn't matter.
Right? It it it they they they might
be a terrorist, kill their whole family.
We saw the same thing in this country.
It's not hard to recognize how they're the
same
concept. And guess what? The US government was
at war because of Israel.
And that's how you can see through the
2 party illusion as I say all the
time. That they only agree on 2 real
things, which is support for Israel and then
war. And we're usually at war because of
Israel. The bottom line is that that's what
we saw. The pea this country went rabid
around anything, and and we see flavors of
that with Russia here and there. But that
was crazy.
You're an Arab, you're a bad person. Right?
Same thing's happening now with Palestinians, and it's
happening again in the same way. That's because
Israel's pushing the same agenda. But, it the
point is to recognize that this is what
governments do.
Governments in general. They propagandize people for their
interest.
Period. Now you can I mean, there there
are
ways
to build something that can begin and it
like, I do believe that there are ways,
even with a government, which I argue we
should just go without personally, but I know
people just can't wrap their minds around that,
to build we just have to be actual
informed constituents as individuals? We have to be
independent of party line. We have to stop
aligning with these ridiculous parties and just act
on principle and policy. Act on compassion and
what you you know, your principle, period.
And changing sides of voting this way, that
way, whatever you actually believe in, and be
engaged,
informed voters because voting does matter in a
real representative government. Point is we could find
some semblance of, you know but as always,
throughout history,
it's slowly, day by day because we get
more and more complacent as people and it's
by design. We get comfortable, we get lazy,
we and then eventually, you wake up and
you're in the same position. That's what government
does. Look through history. It's not my opinion.
It is simply fact.
Let's leave it there for in for time.
Finishing this segment off. Here's
Netanyahu.
Why all this is happening, mind you, simply
showing you a map where West Bank doesn't
exist.
This is not up for debate. They are
openly telling you, if you listen to their
conversations, that this is happening.
And he says, for those who were un
who were apolec apolectic over college students chanting
from the river to the sea,
This is what actual erasure looks like.
Right? And this is how this game works.
They use that
to lie about certain people, to hide their
true intentions, accuse them of that which you
are guilty. It's classic Nazi propaganda in fact.
Maryam,
Maryam Zonstein from 972 magazine in Israel
says, of course, the West Bank does not
exist on Netanyahu's map, and Gaza is forever
Israeli enclave. That's what it says. This speech
will go down in history as Netanyahu's open
admission to that world that is to the
world that Israel will remain between the river
and the sea indefinitely
as long as he rules.
This is an Israeli Jew writing for Israeli
media telling you if you just wanna pay
attention.
But here's the point that I always make.
We talked about this. Elon Musk said this
in 2023.
As I said earlier this week, from the
river to the sea
implies genocide.
Clear calls for extreme violence are against our
terms of service.
Okay.
So okay. Well, here is it. Here's it.
Here it is being used by the Likud
party. That's Netanyahu's party.
As part of their original party platform.
But I'm sure that is totally not the
same thing at all. Right, Elon?
It's literally part of their own platform party
line.
It's probably I think it's right there actually.
Here it is.
Between the sea and the Jordan, there will
only be Israeli sovereignty. So if you're gonna
make one claim, you have to make the
other. Both imply or you could read them
both the same way that one would mean
the other doesn't exist.
Right? I argue it's not as simple as
that. But the point is if you're gonna
make it one way, it applies both ways.
That's just simple logic.
But these people aren't logical, they're liars.
So he didn't care about that because he's
been they've been censoring people who were saying
these things, but not any by the way,
on this platform, Israelis are saying it all
across the all everywhere. Nobody cares about that
though because they're complete hypocrites.
But think about how crazy that is. And
now here,
Meta, Twitter, or, excuse me, Facebook,
rule their board rules anti Israel slogan from
the river to the sea
is not hate speech, which I found
interesting. Glad it happened, but I wonder why.
Maybe they're just the same opportunist recognizing that
Israel doesn't have the same influence they once
did, and they're tired of being who knows?
But here's what New York Post says, a
completely objective platform. Right? Despite Hamas
using it to call for Jewish state destruction.
Gosh. Just so I'm so tired of the
partisan nonsense. All I mean, it's they're just
corporate media, guys. New York Post is just
as stupid and ignorant and dishonest as CNN
and all the rest of them and Fox
News and everybody.
Despite Hamas no. They're not, guys. You're ridiculous.
You're simply adding a partisan line because you're
a partisan platform.
It's it's it's incredible how they make these
lines. But the point is, Nuremberg Bush is
playing its role like the rest of them.
Now here is Israeli settlers,
Khaleesi pointing out how they're stealing land in
West Bank and putting it on Airbnb.
That's happening right now.
Oops.
Oops. Palestinian families' land was stolen, then it
showed up on Airbnb. Israeli settlers run a
bed and breakfast on it. Ziyad Alwan, a
Palestinian American in Chicago, filed a lawsuit against
Airbnb.
For your occupation, they took our land there,
and they gave it to the settlers. They're
running a hotel
in my fatherland.
The United Nations exposed Airbnb along with a
112 other companies such as booking.com
and Expedia as being linked to illegal Israeli
settlements.
Despite Israeli settlements on Palestinian land being illegal
under international law, Airbnb intentionally allows homes to
be rented from these settlements. These tourism businesses
are operating at the expense of Palestinian rights
and livelihoods.
Right. So, yeah, boycott Airbnb. Right? But this
is this is how and just so it's
clear, the BDS movement is wildly effective. They
just don't like you to see that. We're
watching it take place as the well, largely
because of Yemen, which you'll point out in
the end here, but at the end of
the segment. But the point is that they
are suffering. Their economy is collapsing in lots
of ways because of these effects. And my
point is that what they're doing there is
unreal incredibly
illegal. Airbnb doesn't care because they've chosen a
political line. They could just take Palestinian land
and put it up for rent because we
don't care. Because nobody else wants to care.
All these other governments are letting everything else
happen, so we'll take money on it. That
means you're you're com you have no principle.
It means you're disgusting. So, never use Airbnb
because of that. If you actually care about
these principles, right? Some people don't. Fair enough.
I I mean, I I personally find that
that make I think that makes you a
bad person, but that's up to that's that's
for me to decide.
Here's another clip about what's actually going on
in the West Bank. EL is now launching
a major assault against the occupied West Bank
in the latest step of their genocidal campaign
against the Palestinians. The Israeli army deployed hundreds
of soldiers, armored vehicles, bulldozers, drones, and fighter
jets to try to destroy what it claimed
were militants in the regions of Jenin, Tulkuoram,
and Tubas.
At least 18 Palestinians were killed by Israeli
forces and dozens more have been injured, bringing
the total death toll in the West Bank
since October 7th to over 600.
On top of this, Israel's foreign minister has
now called for a voluntary evacuation of the
territory,
raising fears that Israel is going to do
the same thing to the West Bank that
it has been doing to Gaza, in other
words, ethnically cleansing Palestinians.
And these concerns are justified as Israel has
been slowly trying to take over the West
Bank since its illegal occupation began in 1967.
Over half a 1000000 illegal Israeli settlers have
colonized the territory,
supported financially and militarily by the Israeli government
in what is essentially a land grab. It
seems that the lack of action over Israel's
destruction of Gaza has emboldened them to do
what they want with the West Bank without
fear of consequence.
Now, that's part of it but I also
I like what Robert Robert's argument makes a
lot of sense to me that this seems
like a clue they're failing which is any
anybody objective can point out. And this is
an easy way to just destroy the West
Bank and turn around and go, look, we
did it. We won. Right? We we we
we destroyed this Hamas enclave or whatever they're
gonna put out there despite it not being
true. They're not having any resistance other than
random people pushing back.
So they're going to sweep through here. And
they're gonna make it look like a success.
Here is just some numbers.
10,300
Palestinians have been arrested since October 7. That
looks like a week old, probably way more
than that now. This includes 3 355 women,
720
children, 96 journalists.
8,322
are currently being held without charge.
That's just in the West Bank from October
7th. They've got tens of thousands of people
illegally held with no charge,
administrative attention. And your government just loves to
scream democracy.
None of this includes those who are being
held in Gaza. The occupation refuses to publish
those figures.
They are. They're holding people in areas they
control in the in the north and all
over.
Now, lastly, just some positive things, and we're
gonna shift over to the next segment. I
just wanna remind you guys that there are
very positive things happening out there. Right? Going
back to the beginning point, there's a lot
of amazing people out there risking their careers,
their livelihood, everything, in order to change something
for people around the world.
Like, that it's just it's the the amount
of courage and compassion and integrity it takes
to put your career on the line for
people that may not even ever know you're
there.
I mean, it's it's not it's it's just
it's empowering. And as I said, never doubt
that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens
can change the world. Indeed, it's the only
thing that ever has. It's a Margaret Mead
quote. And this is the city council of
Portland who just unanimously voted to divest from
Israel. They're I guarantee they're gonna get an
incredible
pushback, especially since they can get canceled or
whatever you wanna call it. They're a government
entity. They're they're gonna be they're gonna get
threatened. They're gonna get suppressed. They did it
anyway because they know it's right. And she
made a great speech about one person not
making a difference and the reality is, you
know, it's the starfish analogy. Right? Well, the
point is you gotta start that moving. You
gotta show people that action can make a
difference and people will follow suit.
We showed this the other day. The TUC,
the trade union congress in the UK have
unanimously voted to immediately halt the arms sales
of Israel because of the genocide. And he
talks about this. He he said there's tens
of millions of people in this union. And
that the government is gonna have to work
with them or they're gonna strike, which will
shut down UK in a large way. So
he says,
they should all I mean, the point is,
this is more and more powerful people stepping
up and going on taking action
in order to force the hand of their
belligerent governments openly committing genocide.
It's empowering.
As well, the fact that they've as we
said earlier, this guy's reading about it. You
know? Copa, it'll be okay.
Palestine has now been allowed a seat at
the General Assembly of the United Nations.
It's it's it's, there's some level of enjoyment
to watch these people screech online about, oh,
we're gonna allow that. You mean allow them
self determination that you're desperately trying to stop?
Because we care.
As well as this clip from Orwell put
out. So many are turning their backs on
Israel and acknowledging that their crimes may come
at a cost, and it's a wonderful thing.
And it just goes through all these different
groups across the world.
Protest, BTS movements,
Danish pension, divestment from Israeli banks,
ITOCHU
ending
ties with Elbit,
then it says I I s I I
s I f, divesting from 6 is really
companies. Richmond divestment. I mean, it's just one
after another, guys. It's happening all around the
world. People are showing up. San Francisco, you
and I divest from I mean, it's it's
not just places you would expect either. It's
all over the world. King's College London.
It's powerful, guys. I mean, the as as
they pointed out online, these bots and the
the impression is to make you think otherwise.
The world sees it. Your governments, for whatever
reason, are holding the line to their great
detriment.
That should make you confused and ask why
it's happening. France's former prime minister comes out
strong as Israel and urges the west to
use all available leverage to stop it. He
says, quote, the silence
there's silence. It is a taboo. The media
don't even mention it anymore.
All calling it out. Francesca
Rico Ackerman points out the MIT Coalition for
Palestine shares a major victory. MIT activist and
the first American Israeli weapons manufacturer partnership at
a university.
The Scientist Against Genocide Everywhere or SAGE Movement
at MIT continues.
So this is this is huge, guys. These
are huge influential entities.
MIT, they're forcing them to stop funding genocide.
Now
what actual what's gonna happen on the government
side?
The opposite.
Despite what the world is doing, despite what
they're doing, despite them being more exposed than
ever,
the state department approves on the 12th a
$165,000,000
deal for tank trailers with Israel. But the
point is, continuing to aid their genocide.
Giving them more weapons and more support. And
down here, I thought this was important,
Israel receives 3,800,000,000
in military aid from the US every year,
which you should know,
which includes 3,300,000,000
from the MFF
or FMF. In April,
president Biden signed a bill into law authorizing
another $17,000,000,000
in military aid for Israel, which we talked
about.
Right? So, you know, it was 5 plus,
4 plus years of aid all at once,
on top of the 3,800,000,000 they already got
for the year.
And by the way, if you're wondering, Trump
would've done the exact same thing, if not
more. In August, the state department that's my
opinion, obviously, but I think you all know
that based on what he's saying. In August,
the state department approved a series of weapon
sales for another 20,000,000,000,
including 18,800,000,000
for a new fleet of f 15 fighter
jets.
The US aid the US military aid is
required for Israel to sustain its operations in
Gaza, which kills dozens of Palestinians every single
day, if not a lot more. And it
supports escalation of the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria.
But here's another,
you know, $165,000,000
worth of aid because
we're not gonna care about the law, apparently.
Jason Jason Henkel make great point. So he
goes, Iran will be sanctioned, which they're doing,
for selling weapons to Russia, which is not
a crime, by the way.
But the US and Europe can keep selling
weapons to Israel while it conducts a genocide.
No problem. Got it.
Can we not just can we just protect
be clear with the fact that this is
flagrantly ridiculous? What they're doing is exactly what
they're pointing in the world, except they're funding
genocide. Iran is working with an ally. End
of story. Everything else is narrative. What they're
trying to pretend is they're doing all these
bad things. You're
guy you're the ones bombing, destroying, raping, burning,
pillaging. But they're the ones because they're working
with each other. Now, again, I've said every
thou a thousand times over many different shows,
I don't trust these governments.
I don't I'm not saying that they're out
there doing only flowers and sunshine. But they're
not doing what they're pointing at. And it's
shown a 100 times over.
And at the very least, even if you
think so, you're ignoring an open genocide or
the all the occupation of foreign countries, the
destabilization, the theft, the murder. Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq,
Bolivia, Venezuela, Ev oh, no. Somalia.
Non stop destruction, terror, threatened. But it doesn't
matter. Because we're the good guys apparently. Despite
the evil.
At this point, it's so obviously clear as
long as you're not blindly propagandized. And then
on top of that, this on 13th, US
army is upgrading an Israeli base. So not
only are they not stopping, they're upgrading the
bases they're using in order to deliver more
support.
It says to make room for new jets.
In addition to the 1,000,000,000 in weapons, the
US military is re renovating an airbase in
southern Israel.
Now it says it's announced the sale of
1,000,000,000 of dollars of missiles, bombs, and other
weapons in the past year. As the campaign
goes on, now the Department of Defense is
also building aircraft facilities in Israel to accommodate
American made refueling tanker planes. Yeah. Because they're
not supporting the war. No. What they're doing
is maintaining the ongoing war
for the inevitable future.
Yeah. But let's talk about the ceasefire again,
Blinken.
This is according to newly issued public contracting
documents.
Intercept's covering this. So what they're doing is
not just arming them, they're making sure that
they can maintain this war for the long
haul.
Freedom, democracy, liberty.
It's embarrassing.
These are the enemies of our time, guys.
These are the bad people in our world.
They are openly showing you that with everything
they do. That doesn't mean good guy on
the other side of this. But we if
we're gonna stand back and pretend like what
they're pointing at is bad, do you realize
that even the things they claim, let's just
say what they claimed about Iran, was true?
Are we gonna pretend like what they're doing
right now alone is not worse than their
allegations?
An ongoing genocide? The absolute destruction and terror
of multiple countries over a very long period
of time?
I mean, I'm just gonna show you this
now and finish with the Yemen part. Because
this is the point. We're literally talking about
the longest ongoing terror campaign that I've ever
seen.
This is from the Cost of War for
the Watson Institute, International Public Affairs, Brown University.
Summary of findings. Some of the Cost of
War Project's main findings include and we're talking
about the ongoing war on terror, guys.
At least 940,000
people have died due to direct war violence,
including armed forces on all sides of the
conflict, contact with civilians, journalists, humanitarian workers. Over
432,000
civilians have been killed in direct violence by
all parties to these conflicts.
Now you gotta look around and tell me
what wars we're talking about. You damn well
know what we're talking about. An estimated 3.6
to 3.8000000
people have died directly
in post 911 war zones. That's the point.
Bringing the death toll to at least 4.5
to 4.7000000
and counting.
Now sure. That's because of other people engaging
on both sides too. Right? Anyone wanna pretend
like these post 911 wars are I mean,
are we still pretending 911 was what we
were told? I mean, does anybody think that?
Are we actually that stupid?
We the the this government is committing wars
for Israel since that day and before, quite
frankly. But the reality is 4 point 7,000,000
people and counting have been killed because of
these illegitimate wars on countries for Israel.
Did Iraq have WMDs?
Is Syria killing children with gas? No. They've
lied about all of it,
and that's the result. But, yeah, let's keep
quibbling about allegations about Iran that we can't
verify, most of which have proven to be
true. That should matter more to
you. Even if their claims are true, which
I've proven most of them are not.
Now here is Yemen standing up and pushing
back against Israel.
Now realize, despite the many, many, many different
times they've been I mean, the ongoing decade
long starvation campaign, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the
United States have been conducting against Yemen. But
we're not gonna pretend like they have justification
to react. Right? Israel can claim defense for
45 years apparently based on something that they
seemingly were a part in, but Yemen can't
react
based on ongoing bombing and threats and starvation
because they're the terrorists.
It's just sad and obvious.
My point is that they have attacked Tel
Aviv.
Now you can pretend that that's somehow unjustified.
Now look. If they bought if the areas
they bombed were actually not the idea that
we're here's the thing.
Tel Aviv is the central location for their
operations, which many people argue is
kinda crazy that they put they choose a
central location like that and basically turn Tel
Aviv into human shield operation.
Either way, no one should be okay with
bombing civilian locations.
Period. We need to hold that line. I've
always said that. Whether Yemen fighting against Israel
or not. But the bottom line is that
we know that Yemen's in a position where
they're the only ones standing against what's going
on and having a huge effect.
And now they're stepping up the game in
response back to what they're doing. They keep
getting bombed by the US, by the UK,
by Israel.
So now they've responded. They fire at gas
pipelines near Tel Aviv. Now that's my point
is, Israel's claiming they're civilians because that's what
makes the story work, but I've been able
I'm unable to tell. It could be, very
clearly.
But I would argue that based on what
Yemen's done, it's more likely that they would
make sure to aim military targets. They've been
doing this for the very even the ships
they were attacking or taking, they they didn't
kill a single person.
Think about that for a second.
Now it says barrage of missiles flew 2,000
kilometers and took 15 minutes to arrive from
Yemen, also demonstrating their capacity has increased or
their ability,
evading every country's defense systems. Think about that.
Fighter jets jamming systems over airspace of allies.
Saudi Arabia and Jordan without even being detected
or shot down.
So clearly,
you're seeing that whether it's Iran demonstrating this,
Yemen demonstrating this, there or Syria even, they're
showing you that, look, you guys do not
have the if you push us, we're gonna
be destroyed.
And they know that. That's why they're so
desperately trying to get the United States to
act.
That's important to think about.
Now on that top of that, Sony Fang
points out Yemen's Houthis have already shot down
8 American m q nine Reaper drones.
Each of them worth a $150,000,000.
I mean, I forgot to do that really
quickly. We will see what that adds up
to.
$150,000,000.
My god.
What is that? 1,300,000,000?
Is that what that is?
That's crazy. So the point is,
a lot of your tax dollars keep getting
shot down because they're just wasting this on
things that aren't are you okay with spending
a $1,000,000,000 to bur murder innocent people in
Yemen? Hope not.
Now it says the cost includes associated maintenance
infrastructure, spare parts, and so on. Quote, Reaper
Jones have formed the backbone of America's air
operations. They have been involved in encounters with
Russia, and so on.
And, the
most impoverished nation on the planet, maybe save
for Gaza at this moment,
are winning.
And Vanessa Bealey Bealey points this out.
Netanyahu says Israel is too exact heavy price
for the Houthis for the attack. This is
today.
Quote this is what Vanessa writes just as
speaking as them. We are in a multi
front campaign against Iran's evil axis that strives
to destroy us.
Anyone who attacks us will not escape. Netanyahu.
And she goes Yemen.
Like, the point is that they don't Yemen
is clearly not giving Hey, if they were
gonna stop, they would've done that already. And
not only that, I think they're pretty much
showing that they have the upper hand even.
Which just it's, you know, I appreciate it.
It's it's very clear what's going on.
So important to see all of these things
and understand what's going on foreign policy wise.
But let's shift into a conversation starting with
the point about the 2 party illusion. Before
we go there,
the reason that it was so important for
me to cover this is because we're watching
a shift in something that's a shift even
within a very clear shift to foreign policy.
They we must be able to see that
they know we all see them. And the
way that they're acting shows you that at
least they think that they're gonna get away
with this in the long run. I don't
believe that. Honestly, I don't even see I
mean, I shouldn't say that. It's obviously possible,
but
I don't see how it can work out
for them where I mean, at the very
least, they would end up in a way
where they have to admit that they that
we know that they don't care what we
think. And this I think that's a it's
a it's a give and a take for
the way that the US government at the
very least manipulates the public. They need a
certain level of the population to believe that
they're involved, that we vote, and you care
what we think, and it's a dynamic. Otherwise,
they lose control.
And I think that that's a very close
line right now where they're losing that, and
that's why this is all so desperate. My
point is if they if they just
let this keep going,
it'll end up at a point where we're
like, well, yeah. Okay. Now you're done. But
we cut you're done. We all see you.
You there's no way you get away from
that. So I just wonder
what that dynamic is and how,
you know, I say I've said it 3
times now. What's driving that? What is it
that's forcing them to act in a way
that would potentially ruin their entire operation,
which is the US government? I I honestly
don't know, but what I think is important
is that we highlight these things to wake
up one more person every day, more people
that can see how important this is, not
just to foreign policy, but to your life.
What's going on inside your life in the
United States is directly affected by what they're
creating in these conversations. Not whether it's blowback,
whether it's because of the way your government
changes your life based on these dynamics. It's
important. There's a lot of people in the
election right now that are desperate to make
you think, why are you focusing? No. We
look at what we care about. That's the
point, though. We this is all connected.
What you what your government's driving into your
life, like the SAVE Act, the immigration conversation,
Israel has a hand in all of that.
Not little not least of which is the
fact that they're seemingly pulling the strings of
all your politicians, but that should be obvious
to you by now.
But let's get into that.
Let's get into the point about the politicians
and how that is being used right now.
So the 2 party illusion, you we've all
obviously been
talking about this for a while. Only recently
has it suddenly caused a lot of anger
in the 2 party illusion.
I think that shows its vulnerability right now.
And I think that shows you at the
same time as Israel's collapsing that the 2
are interlinked.
But as Salviagris points out, just to start
with a meme, republicans are red, democrats are
blue. Neither one of them gives an f
about you. I think that's the best way
to you wanna just simplify what we're gonna
talk about today, there you go. It's the
reality if we actually care to look at
it. And I think most people are becoming
aware of this.
Now, Elon Musk puts a tweet out that
I think kind of misses the boat, or
rather, you know, misses the forest for the
trees. Maybe it's by, you know, deliberate. I
don't know. But it's a little graph that
shows the self described party affiliation of US
journalists.
1971 to 2022.
Now what's funny is he points out only
one gap. He says the media is a
democrat propaganda machine.
What I think is more interesting about this
now really,
the bottom line is that the the media
leaning one way has been very like, it's
well, here's what the way to understand this.
There's multiple outlets. And, yeah, it seems that,
oh, that a by and large, most of
them lean liberal,
but then there's very clearly still like Fox
News, a very clear republican platform. So you
don't the bottom line is you've got media
for both.
This argument would only make sense if you
thought Republicans were being swayed by Democrat media.
But that way, I think more than ever
in our entire history, that's not happening today.
So you see my point? Like, it's a
it's a the point is, well, there's more
of them. And they're listening over there, but
you're still listening over here. So the propaganda
machine only applies one way. So I don't
see why having more democrat propaganda would influence
them any more than 1 or the point
is they're still getting the same message with
4 different platforms.
You see what I'm saying? So it's it's
kind of a a weird anyway, my point
is,
look at the top.
We're just gonna pretend that we don't notice
that 40, 50 percent of oh, wait. Actually,
52 or 3 percent are independent.
That's not just journalists, ladies and gentlemen. You
maybe hear you've heard me at this point
a 1000 times.
This country
is predominantly people that see through the 2
party illusion, that register as independents.
Every single time, every election, the largest block
of people are people that do not participate.
Now that's people that met be independent or
might want to abstain or recognize but just
are so frustrated by how obviously corrupt it
is that they just don't do it. But
arguably, if they had a choice, they would.
That's based on my research, but you can
decide for yourself. Then the largest block within
those that do vote is always independent.
Usually 40 to 50%.
And we're gonna pretend like this representation of
Kamala and Trump is somehow come on, guys.
We're not this stupid. And I know you
all see it. I'm hoping that you out
there can stand up and make it clear
that you all see it to shake people
out that are still lost in this. They
only need a certain percentage of people to
go along.
The point is that this is the same
thing now. Whether journalists or you or anybody
else, this country is aware of the problem.
And all they want to they just scare
people back in line at the right moment
every 4 years.
How about we change it? How about we
actually change something? That could mean voting.
But if you only participate in the illusion,
you're not actually voting.
Now I talked about this in 31st, the
bipartisan well, rather the partisan managers circle wagons
as the 2 party illusion begins to break
down. I feel that right now. Doesn't mean
they're gonna lose, that suddenly this whole thing
will change because once this election, all the
fervor, all the propaganda, and whatever big things
are, suddenly we people get scared right back
in the line. But at the moment, it
definitely I sense it. There's definitely a vulnerability
here.
Now this is just it's interesting. This is
a clip from, Blake Blakely LLC.
And she's making an interesting point.
So right now, the narrative is all about,
oh, if you're attacking him, you want her
to win. If you're attacking her, you want
him to win. You're gonna let them win.
Right? So the point is, here is a
Democrat, a very clear, open Democrat, who's saying,
Kamala Harris is bad.
She supports genocide.
But if you look at her, she she
clearly hates Trump. That's obvious at work. So
what's interesting
is your argument that she's trying to help
Trump win, or that she's inadvertently helping Trump
win?
You see my point? It's a lazy argument
that's not rooted in fact. The idea is
it's an assumption based on
2 party politics.
The point is she's just simply telling you
the truth about Kamala Harris. But she also
would would hate Trump.
Those things can exist outside of some kind
of secondary narrative. They want you to think
like that because they want you to think
that your only option is one or the
other, and she's worse, so you have to
go Trump. So basically, you don't have a
choice. We're gonna pretend you got a choice,
but we know there's no choice because Trump's
the only way to go. Oh, so there's
not an election? No. You can you can
pick, but don't pick her because then you
won't then it wouldn't matter. So there is
no choice. It's just like it's this endless
cycle. It's like we're watching Abbott and Costello.
It's obvious what's going on, but we lie
to ourselves because of the cycle. So here
she is telling you that Kamala Harris is
a maniac and a genocider.
Now I don't know if I'm I haven't
fleshed out her work at elsewhere. I don't
know if she wants Joel Stein or if
she's not voting. I don't know. But I
just want you to hear the reality that
this is more there are people of all
over the paradigm who can see right now
that there's nothing bad choices. And some of
us think that
that abstaining or not voting or exit building
or vote packed or voting third party or
all these things are out there and think
that these things might make a difference.
I'm I'm of the mind that
larger
protests around not doing this would make a
difference if not voting abstention, if that was
allowed. But all the other things are possible
too. I support your choice if you actually
believe in what you're voting for. But by
and large, people are being forced into a
lesser of evils dynamic. That's the 50% independent.
That's the people that don't vote. They're all
being forced at the vast majority of Americans
being forced into something they don't want. And
then acting like that's the adult thing to
do because what else are we gonna do?
That's being that's giving up. Now I just
wanted you to hear this from a perspective
about the fact that there are people on
all sides pointing out other sides' problems, and
we just have to be like, these are
just facts.
Facts
are facts. It's not about you can use
facts to drive an agenda,
but if you pretend that because of the
agenda that therefore the facts are no longer
relevant,
you're I don't I don't even know what
you would call that. Ignorance?
Easiest thing about people getting mad when we
say,
hey, if you want us to vote for
Kamala Harris, then she needs to change her
policy on the Israeli regime and commit to
stopping weapons shipment. People are acting like that
is a radical demand
when it's literally already the law. And I'm
not just referring to international law because, you
know, I know that we don't give a
fuck about international law. I'm talking about the
Leahy law. I'm talking about the laws of
these United States.
We are asking her to enforce the law.
When there was that interview that Dana Bash
did with her and she was asked about
this, her answer shouldn't have been repeating APAC
talking points. Her answer should have been, I
am committed to enforcing
the law. It And you see the point
is, the right the the right side is
going, she's gonna destroy Israel. She's gonna let
them fail. When even their own party are
going, she's all blindly supporting Israel.
Like, if we can't stand back and see
how dumb that is and recognize that we're
all being misled, if we're falling into those
binary traps, then we don't want to. And
I am increasingly seeing that as a smaller
and smaller percentage day by day. It gives
me hope.
Isn't her whole campaign thing, like, Donald Trump
is a criminal, and I am the top
cop and the prosecutor who's gonna prosecute the
case against this criminal
authoritarian
who wants to turn this place into a
dictatorship? Like, that is her campaign.
That's the message.
So then why would it be out of
step with your own message to say, as
someone who's running on law and order,
we want the Israeli regime to follow the
law. We, in the United States, are going
to enforce the law.
But you guys are acting like it's unreasonable
for those of us who are hesitant to
vote for somebody who clearly has said she
is not going to change her policy on
And that goes both ways. Now she's speaking
to liberal to to Democrats,
liberals,
but the point is it applies both sides
right now.
Both in how does that not show you
that we're in a bad situation here? If
both sides of the paradigm who are pointing
each other acting like you couldn't be more
different are both going, you just wanted to
you're both they're both giving you the same
narrative to support Israel's genocide.
Blatantly against the law, blatantly against our own
policies, which is incredible.
And it shows you nothing except obvious influence
of Israel over our entire political sphere. The
Israeli regime, it's going to be exactly the
same as Biden's. You want us, just regular
voters,
to change our stance, the same stance you
had 5 minutes ago instead of demanding that
her campaign change their stance. Make it make
sense. Because it's our government right now, the
Biden Harris administration,
that's having a meltdown that the UK caused
8%
of their fucking arms shipments as if that's
gonna make a fucking difference. And yet the
US is still freaking out. Their parliament is
even having the debate. Our congress isn't even
debating it. They're on the same fucking side.
Sorry, guys. I forgot to give you a
heads up on the cussing. I usually do
that. My my bad on that. But good
points.
I mean, it's all valid.
Now here's Kim Iverson pointing out the APAC
point. She she says I won't vote for
an APAC candidate.
Now you see, this is what's important. That's
called a principled stance. Whether you agree with
it or not,
if you know that APAC is illegitimately
influencing your politics, you go, okay. Well, I
won't vote for somebody who aligns with that
position.
And then you you acknowledge who actually is
not in that category, and then you make
a principled choice
To pretend that you're gonna vote for one
that is being completely bought off by a
foreign entity because what else am I gonna
do? That's being a child.
Now it says a foreign country has bought
off so many of our politicians, they now
control our foreign policy, have marched us into
wars, and have successfully lobbied for numerous censorship
laws.
Right? You you speak you're hearing that? Free
speech advocates on the right, they're absolutely censoring
your speech right now. Just because you don't
see an interest in calling out Israel doesn't
mean that it's it's it's same thing as
always. It's only bad when it affects you
in your way. Right? It's like if you
wanna censor or cancel people for making bad
jokes about Trump, then, yeah, who cares? You
it means you're a hypocrite. And my point
in saying both those things, child and hypocrite,
it's the minority of people.
My I wanna be clear about that. I'm
of the mind that most conservatives and liberals
are are beginning to see these things. It's
the team sport politics, cons Republican and Democrats,
who are desperate to maintain their power over
the rest of us, who are driving people
into those choices.
She says, since both Trump and Kamala are
APAC candidates
Trump more than Harris, she says, but I
I disagree. I think they're both very clearly
on the same path. She says, I won't
be voting for either of them. It's really
that simple.
She says, I say APAC, but I mean
the entire collective Israeli lobby, which includes non
APAC money, which is true, by the way,
like Miriam Miriam a Adelson.
Scott says, I'll vote for the one that
can keep us out of nuclear war. That's
it. If we can make it to November.
Now I don't I, you know, I like
Scott Ritter, but I don't like, like, I'm
all I can clearly see that we are
existing in a situation that is increasingly more
dire.
But this idea that somehow that it all
hinges around the election, that we're gonna go
to nuclear war, it's it's just as likely
right now as it is then.
So I feel it's a little bit hyperbolic,
and I feel like that's coming a little
bit from the kind of Infowars side of
this conversation. Apparently, he's out there screening right
now about the apparent assassination of Trump that
just happened. As as far as I could
tell, there was some shooting in some woods
near where he was and everyone's freaking out
and the story's gonna blow out of proportion
like every other story from the right right
now where it just gets cobbled together with
all sorts of fake narratives and assumptions and
fake images. And each one that gets pushed
aside, new one pops into place and we
don't acknowledge that they were already caught lying
Over and over and over, we'll get to
that story next. About the one about Haiti
anyway.
And, of course, it could end up being
something at the end of the day. But
at the moment, it still matters that people
are blindly assuming in the direction of what
they want you to think is going on.
That has to matter even if the assumption
later turned out to be true.
It's it's it's not about that they had
the facts and knew it then. They if
they had those, they would present them and
you would be able to decide for yourself.
They're floating an assumption and it later this
is what Alex is
everything they do. But
she says Trump will have zero control
over war with Russia. Congress has the power
to override him regarding weapon sales, and they
will. Threat of action is usually enough.
I'll leave that for a bunch of time.
But the bottom line is simply that her
point is obvious. And his point is coming
down, which I, you know, I like I
do. I like Scott Ritter, but the point
here
so based on this,
the opinion that this is a building into
some inevitable thing which both sides are driving
that you're gonna choose the I guess his
his point is, I guess, Trump. I mean,
I don't even know where to take that
as. Which one do you think will keep
us out of war? Trump says a lot
of things, but his actions prove that those
don't mean anything.
So and both of them are completely, openly,
broadly funding the group that is that that
biggest threat that Scott would tell you.
So it's it's a wash. They're the same
thing.
I don't know. I'd say it's I'm I'm
incredibly
frustrated how people keep just using what Trump
said as the barrier between who you choose
between.
Politicians lie to us on a regular basis.
I hope you're right, but why would we
base everything on the fact that Trump said
this now? Well, he also said a lot
of stuff last time that didn't happen. They
all do.
Well, in respond she also points out both
party and the well, this tweet from Republicans
against Trump. The Republican for Harris movement is
gaining serious momentum.
I mean, maybe who knows if it's even
real or if these are just, you know,
insider manipulations.
The bottom line is the idea that you
have people that are
republicans,
who are suddenly gonna vote for Harris even
though the idea is well, you know, let
me put it this way. I actually take
it to a degree. Your point is if
you're still go if you're still saying you're
republican and voting for the party, I in
a way, I almost appreciate that. Because the
idea is not just flip flopping parties because
on a team sport side, but that you
are a republican,
but you just feel that Harris has a
better policy set. That's how would this should
be going. The idea that you're supposed to,
like, blindly adhere to your party line and
ignore policy is ridiculous.
But that being said, I don't feel like
this is real. Just like all of these.
I think this is more propaganda about trying
and as Kim says, both parties can claim
they're the unity parties. That does feel like
a push both are trying to lie to
you about
because they are both bringing in people, quote,
from the other side. In reality, we're just
ping pong balls on the ping pong table
of the duopoly.
Exactly. Well put. Right? So whether or not
they're doing this or doing that, you're still
lost in that same manipulation
where they're both the same thing.
And this probably says, actually, all I see
is Democrats varying shades of blue and black.
And so this is the point I wanna
make.
All it comes down to is that if
they say the thing you don't like, well,
they're no longer Republicans.
You don't get to choose that, Ramis.
The point is that we should be able
to put vote on policy and not just
that they're red or blue.
He what he's saying is you're no longer
Republican if you do these things.
That's not I I thought it was based
on principles. Not anymore. This is the memeification
world that we live in where we're bay
it's just it's all boiled down to talking
points and lies.
It's a game.
Same thing here. This person says, they've never
been Republicans if they entertain such thoughts.
What thoughts? Voting for somebody other than the
Republican line?
So they're admitting it. And the point is,
they don't even realize how dumb it is
to say that.
It says Kamala's values are against the core
of what a Republican is. Now that's not
an invalid point, but that is for those
people to decide.
I mean, I'm gonna make a point right
after this about the woke right. And it's
the same point about saying, you can't say
this if you're a Christian. Well, that's not
for you to decide.
You can argue that you believe the values
of Christians shouldn't be that they shouldn't that's
not that's against the values of what you
think a Christian is.
But I'll I'll get to that point in
a second. The bottom line is that you
don't get to pick and choose what they
believe.
That you can argue that you think that
means that that, you know, I'm to your
the point is that I can call myself
I mean, I'll get to a second. I'm
I'm gonna go into that point. In this
point, it's the same thing.
They have never been Republicans if they feel
that they wanna vote for somebody else. No.
That that's showing your ignorance.
Period.
Because it's about what you believe in, and
you can still be a Republican and simply
argue that you feel Kamala's actions will better
this country. And maybe that means that they're
not republican policies or republican principles, but you
just feel that you see the point? But
you can still maintain your principles of what
you believe a republican should be.
But apparently, the people that are in the
the the childish mentality of the 2 party
paradigm won't allow people to think beyond red
or blue.
And a, Andrea Lynn says, serious question.
This is excellent. This is well put. If
Israel if Israel if Hillary Clinton
had been president in 2020
actually, I made this exact point if it
was Obama.
I meant I've said this so many times,
which is why I believe Trump was put
in this place because they knew it would
pacify the most the the what would be
the most resistant to everything that was about
to happen? The constitutional,
militia, gun owners.
But because Trump was there, they were pretty
pacified what happened during COVID 19.
Same thing I think is about to happen
again. Rolling out the digital ID and everything
else, and you're gonna put them in a
position where they're suddenly pacified because it's the
Trump Elon version.
But she says, if Hillary Clinton had been
president in 2020,
declared a fake pandemic,
initiated lockdowns,
forced socialism,
orchestrated the largest transfer of wealth via the
CARES Act,
promoted the COVID vaccines as safe and effective,
awarded Fauci,
called herself the mother of vaccines,
demanded credit for it all, but didn't mandate
the vaccine.
Would you give her a free pass, or
would you hold her to count?
Do you even need to answer that? I
mean, this is an excellent point that should
and I guarantee this makes some people very
uncomfortable. Because even as they read it, hopefully,
it woke some people up. The read list
going, man. Yeah. I would. I would. I
would be like, bang. You should put her
in jail.
But because Trump did all those things, now
I'm sure they're gonna take issue with the
calling what he did socialism even though, of
course, it's all selectively applied based on certain
things in certain times and who did it
and what their name is and what they
believe in. No. It's just based on certain
politics. The bottom line is even remove that
if you want.
All of these things. Even just one of
these things. If Hillary Clinton declared a fake
pandemic, period.
You know what would happen. If if everything,
initiated lockdowns, the idea that he didn't make
them. Yes. But he opened the door. He
did the emergency which allowed it. He did
Defense Production Act, which is basically a thor
it's, martial law for production, which then he
boasts to this day about masks and ventilators,
which kill people and still do.
I mean, it's not a no brainer.
If Obama
even blinked hard, people scream martial law. But
Trump comes in and literally initiates all this
and everyone goes, okay. It's Trump. That's the
point. And you know damn well that if
it was Clinton, this would she people would
be marching through the streets.
This person says, I think Trump made mistakes,
and this is the point, and this is
what you get when this happens.
But when you have governments worldwide, health care
professionals and media lying to you, you could
be duped. Okay. So your answer is he
got man he got tricked?
Well, you didn't. I didn't. We all saw
it. You're telling me he didn't listen to
anybody but his inside I mean, come on,
guys. That's pretty dumb. But at the very
least, you wouldn't want him again, would you?
If he's that easy to be played when
he won't listen to his own constituents, you
all saw it? Come on. That's pretty pathetic.
This is even when he recommended the smallest
suggestion
of other medications, those involved made him out
to
be root of, you know, Nazi war criminal.
But that's in fact, what he did put
forward were things that killed people, like remdesivir.
Even Ivermectin is now a disputed thing within
the Republican conversation. The point is, it's interesting
how that's your answer.
In fact, what he did though is keeps
to this very day pushing the injection. How
do you explain that?
And he says, I think the supporters, for
the most part, chose not to agree with
them on the vaccines.
Oh, so it's okay you're gonna ignore mass
genocide using a medical treatment?
Really?
We just don't agree on how he murdered
all those people or ignores it to this
day. At least in my circle okay. So
the point is and this is very this
is perfect. I mean, this neat this is
exactly like that Zionist circle showing you how
Zionist propaganda works.
Freedom First points this out.
It says, Trump supporters be like, he didn't
say that. And if he did, he didn't
mean that. And if he did, he didn't
understand it. Or no, sorry. I missed it
over. He didn't say that. And if he
did, he didn't mean that. And if he
did, you didn't understand it. And if you
did, it's not a big deal.
And if it is, others have done worse.
Tell me that's not exactly the mental cycle
of what we keep seeing about what Trump
keeps doing.
I mean, of course, the moment that starts
to register as real, it'll be, oh, you're
a lefty and you want to call it
a win. Let's put that to bed. Facts
and logic, put away because partisan.
It's just sad.
That doesn't mean they're all blind manipulators, but
it means that it's that easy to play
people who want to believe in an ideologue,
and many of which you don't care because
they're aligned with TeamSport politics.
Time and time again, that's been happening. And
it's again, it's not unique to Trump, but
I think it's more important to reach the
people on that side right now.
Now Anomaly put out a tweet on the
19th December of 2023, which I think is
important to reiterate.
Is I play this little stupid game believing
the Republican party under Trump was different. Until
the country locked down,
Trump claimed on social media he was the
one with the power to do it. He
printed trillions of, like, trillions like a psychosocialist,
gave out COVID stimulus checks like a communist,
yelled at Thomas Massie for being the only
one not sold out, gave $18,000,000,000
in socialist scam money to big pharma to
beat us down. Then Ted Cruz told us
only vaccinated people can take the mask off
and bear planes, and TP USA glorified him
every cent every year since like a rock
star with 0 journalistic pushback.
I'm right. I don't care how we go
or mad. This party is fake, and no
one wants the fantasy to cosplay delusion to
end. Timeless is timeless.
I'm not chasing coins and social circles.
I don't I mean, I I'm I'm You
can decide whether you think his opinion's changed
since then, but the point is clearly,
it's I mean, it's exactly the point. I
mean, people have lied to themselves about this.
My opinion is that they're all doing the
same thing, both sides of this. But, just
we need to recognize that this seems to
be the side most kind of under I
think most of Kamala's support is very flimsy
based on her. Like, they're the ones that
are very much more open and aware that
she's allowing genocide. Most of the Christian Republicans
or just Republicans in general seem to be
kind of lying themselves about that. So I
feel like it's more important to reach them
with this. But again, let's not forget the
idea of what we're talking about here, about
the allowance of where this is going now.
And the odds include this this kind of
compilation of of statements of him saying, we're
bringing the biometric wall,
air, land, and sea. It's for all of
you. Right? It's not just people coming in.
It's anybody coming in and out. And this
is Trump saying the vaccine very recently and
still says to this day helps people save
lives. You don't die if you get it.
It's only good thing. It's it's not true.
It's ridiculous. Here he is saying that Israel
should have control over congress and they once
did rightly so.
That's what he says. All on the record,
here he is saying that we should close
close-up the Internet and help that Bill Gates
help us because people are joining ICE, apparently.
Here he is saying, take the guns first,
do process later.
But, yeah, go ahead and give me all
your narratives that explain all that away.
Now Shannon Joy, who I'm gonna be on
the her show recent coming up soon, she
says for the let me play it first,
actually. And this is actually incredible because I've
seen so much pushback from largely republicans about
and we there's plenty of reason to be
skeptical and concerned about anything cryptocurrency related. I'm
right there with you. Doesn't mean I'm ignoring
and dismissing or discounting anything that might have
an effect, but my point is that we
should go forward very cautiously with some of
these anonymous things. I'm I'm outwardly
against all the ones that I can see
are being used by the governments. My point
is that I think there are some level
of cryptocurrencies
that might be able to play a role
in pushing back as we go forward. But
I'm not blindly going in that with a
you know, I'm I'm watching as it goes.
In the moment that I feel that this
is not the case and the bottom line
is, as always, these things are tools.
Like a hammer can build a house, it
can bash your head, and I think it's
how it's being used. That's my personal opinion.
And I'm ready for any more information that
you might think will change that opinion. And
my point in saying all that is people
love to frame that is we're just blindly
supporting crypto. It's not the case. Not even
remotely. We're very more than most, in fact,
very skeptical. My point in this, those same
people that would call us secret sell out
or this or that are
not gonna say a word about what Trump's
about what Trump is doing.
Join me live on Twitter Spaces at 8
PM, this September 16th,
for the launch of World Liberty Financial.
We're embracing the future with crypto and leaving
the slow and outdated big banks behind.
Oh, yeah.
Now
as Shannon says, for the love of god,
please don't fall for this scam from the
guy who told you to shove poison into
your arm after the fake pandemic. Now people,
you know, the idea about that, I would
agree, is misrepresented to to, you know, about
the bleach and the vein and all that.
But what he said was it's it was
clear he didn't understand what he was saying.
So I'll give him that out, but it
was stupid. So it's, you know, one side
wants to claim that he made the right
statement. The other side wants to make it
a little bit more crazy than it is.
I do agree with what you're saying that
the the guy, you know, is not someone
to be trusted. But anyway, the point is
this will be a programmable surveyable digital currency.
I completely agree with what she's talking about
here, which can be confiscated when tied to
social credit score. People cannot be this stupid.
Right? I agree.
My point is we already know what's happening
here. This is the just this is new
this is the new I seven on the
way back machine or the archives you can
look at it later. September 13th, Donald Trump
prepares to unveil cryptocurrency business. This will apparently
will be unveiled tomorrow. We'll see if it
actually happens. I think this is where it's
gonna go, which was Shannon was talking about.
Trump says he molds Jamie Dimon for US
Treasury. So the JPMorgan sort of private coin
that Whitney's been talking about,
which all the Elon fanboys and Trump supporters
are gonna pretend it's the right thing. This
is what we'll do. And probably make a
similar argument to what I'm saying from the
other side. That this will be the thing
we can use to fight back. You know,
maybe the right. Then question everything, consider it
for yourself. Personally,
why Jamie Dimon or JPMorgan would represent anything
but the system? You know, it's the same
thing they do every time. Suddenly we're anti
establishment, fighting the power, but then we're gonna
work with all the power. But you gotta
have the insiders to fight the inside. Whatever.
Just keep cobbling together your narratives and just
walk blindly into the same thing every time.
My point is, I think it's obvious that
this is just the same thing as Whitney
points out with Palantir. It is a privatization
of what they couldn't get away with because
people were pushing back. Now with pacification of
Trump and all the right wing conversation,
they'll roll this out and say this is
the good guy thing. It's not a CBDC.
It's private. But it is worse because of
that. Just like Catherine told us in a
last interview. It'll be worse because it's private.
It's the same thing.
Wake up. It's being built around you, and
you're falling for it if you're thinking this
is gonna change. Now the point is, the
same thing I was saying earlier,
this is the dynamic on both sides is
so clear.
They're using the same emotional,
subjective, assumption points to drive you into position.
My my point about saying this about the
woke right, Kevin Sorbo
put this out and said, you can't call
yourself a Christian.
So first, just to be clear right there,
you're already wrong. Okay? You can call yourself
a Christian would no matter what. But his
point is not about whether you can say
things, not free speech. He's saying, you can't
call yourself a Christian. You can't be a
Christian is what he means and support somebody
who openly advocates for abortion.
Now look. I've made my opinions clear about
abortion in general. And to sum it up
generally, my point is obviously from a religious
perspective or just like a human perspective, I
do. I have a problem with it. But
at the same time, from my liberty perspective,
from my freedom perspective, actual fault, my point
is it's their choice to make. And it's
my choice to be able to say I
think you're a bad person for doing that
or whatever the the conversation would be. The
it's obviously a hard conversation when it gets
into things like rape and so on. The
point is simple. It's not for us to
sit here and decide for everybody else. Your
government should not be the one deciding what
you can do with your body in any
context. That's that's real liberty and freedom, guys.
And, yeah, that means some people may be
able to do things that you disagree with.
Oh my god. It's funny how both sides
have those things. Right? The right the left
wants to tell you what you have to
be able to do and what you're free
but here's the right telling you what women
can do with their body. It's the same
dynamic.
And, yes, each side rationalizes it based on
what they believe is important.
Now that's not even the main point. But
we my point is generally, this is the
same that's culture war, different dynamics, the same
flavor, it's the same damn thing.
But my point here,
as I said, the woke right is just
like the woke left with a slightly different
flavor.
Is that the idea
is it ultimately comes down to the fact
that maybe as a Christian, somebody out there
believes
or interprets the bible differently.
That's what different church god you know, Christian
versus Episcopalian or whatever. They have different interpretations
about the same conversation for the most part.
So for him to come out and say
that he's the only one that knows or
his his group or his sect or what
he believes, it just shows you that what
you're trying to do is tell people how
to live their lives. You can say I
don't think you're a Christian, but you can't
simply say you can't be a Christian if
you think like this. That's closed minded. Then
my this this person says, what did he
say that wasn't true?
And this person follows up saying many Christians
support abortion rights, which is actually true.
Or, I mean, look. How about this? There's
people out there in the Christian world that
support Israel committing genocide.
Now, they could be wrong, they could be
confused, they could be bad people.
Still makes them Christians though. I just think
it's gross that anybody, Christian or not, would
support genocide. And I would argue that if
it's not a Christian value, but my point
is it's it's ridiculous for anybody like this
to stand up. And the point is this
is in support Oh, I should show you
this first.
In response to
Oh, where was it? Oh, you know what?
Damn it. I didn't get the,
damn it. It was underneath another post about
that. Damn it. I should grab that.
I can't I wanna go find it now.
But anyway, the bot it was oh, that's
what it was. It was about oh, that's
right. So I'm glad I remembered. So it
was Kamala Harris. And somebody's saying they were
gonna vote for Kamala Harris or support Kamala
Harris. And they're simply saying, well, you can't
be a Christian then if you support her
because she supports abortion.
You see? And that that's wildly abstract. So
now you're saying I can't be a Christian
but support somebody who has a different value?
You see my point? Like, this is so
incredibly that's that's woke mind virus for you
right there. Whether it's about religion or not.
You're telling me that I whether I'm a
Christian and I meet every single value that
you think makes me a Christian, I can't
be like, well, she likes abortion,
but everything else will say to this country,
so we can't vote for her or you
can't believe you're a Christian if you do?
Mean, do you wanna talk about purity tests?
It's right there for you.
And, I mean, the it's my opinion aside.
The whole point of people respond going, you
think that's Christian? It's not about my opinion,
guys. It's about the reality that you're drawing
lines about other people and what they believe.
How is that how is that any different
than what the woke thing or oh, a
trans agenda? It's the same damn thing. It's
gonna offend a lot of people, but I
don't care. It's the fact. It's the reality.
The point is, she says, but it should
be, a culture of death is not from
the Holy Spirit. Okay. That's again, I I
agree.
But people have different opinions about what we're
talking about. You're make you're drawing all these
political lines that should not they should not
see between them and God, not you and
your judgment.
He says, I agree, and I hope that
Christians feel the same way about not accepting
a slaughter of Palestinian children. Boom.
Well done, Karen. But that's the name, Karen
wrath. And all innocent victims were. And good
enough right? So care Carrie
says true.
But what's funny though is the point is
made very well. A lot of the Christians
who are openly screaming about how you can't,
cor Sorbo included,
are weirdly ignoring the ongoing genocide of children.
Many of which are pregnant by the way.
Or, I mean, women that are pregnant by
the way. Doesn't that matter too? It should.
I I don't think I included it actually.
Oh, I guess right here. Perfect. So this
person says, that's not being woke. It's actually
a foundational Christian belief, and he's a 100%
correct.
Here's what I said. Agreed
for his life.
Kevin does not decide who is and is
not a Christian.
Remember, judge not lest you be judged, Matthew
71?
Projecting and forcing your beliefs and interpretations on
those beliefs or excuse me. Projecting, forcing your
beliefs and interpretations of those beliefs onto others
is exactly
what that term embodies, Being woke. Today, anyway.
You just don't wanna see it.
I mean, to me, that is absolutely sound.
Especially the idea that I thought we weren't
supposed to judge the people. Like, you you
can you I mean, you have your beliefs,
and I agree. From a Christian perspective that
does challenge those beliefs.
That's where that ends. That's for you to
decide. That's for you to believe. For you
to jump over and say, you're not part
of this group because of what you're think
that's not how that's supposed to work.
But I guess that's not a Christian one
of the Christian values that they chose to
ignore. So I guess it's selective based on
their interpretations of the bible. See how that
works?
Projecting and forcing your beliefs, whatever they may
be, religious or not, and interpretations of those
beliefs onto others is exactly what woke is.
People are more and more seeing this, by
the way, guys. The woke right is just
like the woke left.
Here's another example. Same point. Woke right is
just like the woke left with a slightly
different flavor. Here's Bennie Johnson
saying ABC did a 90 minute live interview
with Trump and never once stopped to say,
sorry you got shot in the head.
It's just so stupid. First of all, he
got shot in the ear. I'm second tired
of him pretending he got shot in the
head. Your ear is on your head, it's
not your head, it's your ear.
You don't call your nose your head, do
you? It's on your head. The point is,
it's not even remotely what they keep projecting
projecting. And frankly, the whole story is completely
ridiculous for I'm I mean, it's just not
even worth diving back into. It is absurd.
And now we're watching new, you you know,
a shot in the field and everyone's screaming
about assassination again. The bottom line,
why does that have any relevance in the
conversation?
So the you know you know what? This
is just as stupid as going,
Trump didn't condemn those people the way we
like, so he supports all the bad things.
You're doing the same thing. And that's my
point.
You're now gonna do they didn't stop to
ask him how your ear is doing, Trump?
Because that's dumb. Because frankly, no. It's it's
a ridiculous thing. Bottom line is whether you
think the re whatever you think about what
happened,
why that has any relevance over what you're
going to be talking about, and or why
you think they obviously hate him, why they're
gonna go, hey, Trump. How's your ear doing,
bud?
It's just silly. I just wanted to point
that out because it is. It's the same
damn thing. You're using the points that you
think are important in the same exact ways.
Now Ian White points out, I feel the
Tenet Media gig, the whole Russia overlap we'll
make a point on,
could be created to do exactly that.
As well as for the victim podcasters to
offer up all their contracts for Pfizer. Now,
he's just pointing out the idea of how
the the same thing and how you manipulate
them. I wanted to use that to segue
into the idea of that Russian influenced
right wing media conversation,
which involves these people, by the way.
Now b x wanted to make a point,
first of all, about the shooting,
which I actually think is crazy.
Mister intelligence Jack Pesobuch says, bulletproof
is the first book written about the events
of Trump's assassination attempt, or whatever you wanna
call it. ABC cut off Trump when he
brought it up. Will not let the story
be silenced. Now who knows if that's even
true? It's the same as they just love
to fake create the strides and effect and
be like, they're gonna take the damage and
get it now. And And it's there for
the next 14 years. It's always how this
goes. But either way, the point is
bulletproof.
How a shot meant for Donald Trump took
out Joe Biden. That's what it's called.
B x says it's only been 2 months
since the assassination attempt, and there's an already
a book. Now I argue, yes. These things
have been streamlined today, but I agree. That's
at the very least, it's probably pretty flimsily
of research. Right? I mean, how for all
as far as I'm concerned, we never even
got answers for half these things and they
wrote a book about it. I can promise
you it is a republican talking point about
the story.
Either I mean, I I I'm I've the
only thing I took from this is that
there's about half the story that is completely
inconsistent with everything else.
And we just we just stuck to the
official story. So the bottom line is here's
now you got the republicans
selling you the official story.
Funny how that works. We'll probably go look
20 years back and go, here's why the
official story was false. Just like all the
rest of them. But it's funny how in
this case, the very people screaming about the
the reality of the conspiracies are the ones
selling you the official story.
Now onto their the RT tenant overlap, which
is important for the independent media point. Here's
what the, this is what the state department
just put out on 13th, alerting the world
to RT's global covert activities,
which I'm I'm not surprised at all that
any of these places, whether media or state
run media or both, are doing. But what's
funny is coming from the state department. One
of the most prolific propagandizers
I've ever heard of and very clearly in
the world right now, if not the,
maybe save for Israel.
Here's what they say, the point that I
wanna pluck out of this. The United States
supports the free flow of information. Yeah. Let's
all chuckle real quickly about how dumb that
is. And then they say, we are not
taking action against these entities and individuals for
the content of the reporting. Again,
So stupid. How obvious we know it's not
true. Or even the disinformation they create and
spread publicly.
You mean
I mean, in the regard to the tenant
story
I mean, actually, what's funny about that is
the more you look back what how much
of that was actually false information and how
much of it is just simply they don't
like that Russia's the one putting them to
it? I mean, look through what they talk
about. I I don't remember there being that
much that was false. It was just that
they were pushing them to make statements about
what was going on around Trump.
Either way, I'm sure there was plenty of
things that you could call misinformation or dis
that's what they're all trying to accomplish. But
what's funny about it
is that they're pushing this as if we're
just the good Samaritan
trying to stop the bad guys from propagandizing.
And he goes on to say, we are
taking action against them for their covert
influence activities.
Okay. So have you proven that a state
I mean, I know you love to scream
RT is state backed. And even if it
is, that's no different than Fox and CNN
and PBS and all the rest of them.
Okay. So does that mean that every time
our media makes a statement ever so suddenly,
yeah. Well, that that would apply. That now
that's official. It's the point we're gonna make
about both the Twitter discussion or just our
government acting around the world with their save
Ameri or, what is it? The radio free
America, radio free all they're straight up propaganda
platforms.
So that would make it a crime. And
that's why many company many countries don't allow
them in anymore. They cry foul. The point
is that they're sitting here pointing at RT,
but the only claim is we claim it's
state run, which arguably I hear from people
that work with them that they that there's
literally no overlap, but that could be lies
for all we know. But again, evidence matters.
So if we're stuck with that, we leave
it or it's up in the air at
the very least.
And they're saying that that is the problem.
So now you're pointing at RT
paying people to have conversations. And that's just
media, by the way. And saying the problem
is because it becomes a state backed action.
Well, that's the point they keep making. They
haven't proven that, mind you, and that should
matter to you. But it says, covert influence
activities are not journalism. Yeah. I agree.
The United States will always stand for freedom
of expression, except you don't anywhere, including for
those whom we disagree. And you don't do
that anywhere I've ever seen in my life,
but let's pretend. It says, we encourage dissent.
No, you don't. Open debate. No, you don't.
And free discourse. Hardly.
But we will not stand for attempts by
state actors to carry out covert activities. That
was the point. To hijack disclo discourse.
Well, Well, you know, we probably know where
this is going.
Here's what here's what Lincoln said about this
conversation.
In response,
today, the United States,
the United Kingdom, and Canada
are launching launching a joint diplomatic campaign
to rally allies and partners around the world
to join us in addressing the threat posed
by RT
and other machinery of Russian disinformation and covert
influence.
Under the,
using, excuse me, the the Internet intelligence diplomacy,
has become a hallmark
of our administration.
I've instructed US diplomats around the world
to share the evidence that we, using, excuse
me, the d and covert influence. RT
and other machinery of Russian disinformation and covert
influence
under the,
using, excuse me, the d Internet intelligence diplomacy,
has become a hallmark
of our administration. Did he just make a
big full full part? Did he just meant
meant to say diplomacy but said intelligence? I'm
pretty sure he just made that mistake.
That's crazy. I don't think there's an intelligence
diplomacy overlap. Right? So I'm pretty sure he
just meant to say diplomacy, which is what
he continues to say, but actually said which
I mean, really?
Exactly. It's an intelligence operation. It has nothing
to do with diplomacy. Hilarious.
I've instructed US diplomats around the world
to share the evidence that we've gathered on
RT's expanded capabilities
and the ways it's being used to target
individual countries and the information ecosystem
that we share.
Now each government of course is going to
decide how it responds to this, threat
but
we urge every ally,
every partner to start by treating RT's activities
as they do other intelligence activities by Russia
within their borders.
Now let me be very clear. The United
States respects
and champions freedom of expression.
I I by the way, I hate that.
Like, say they all would do it when
they want a man. Let me be very
clear.
And there's, like, no difference in the inflection.
It's just you just it's just funny. These
people are all such mindless robots. But the
point is as they write right here, as
combat points out, they are launching a global
censorship campaign. It's what it is. Now they
they love to make it sound diplomat diplomatic,
but the point is they're gonna pressure other
governments to do this. And that will come
out, it always does, as they got forced
or coerced or threatened. And it'll end up
being, we'll get it for their interest, but
you force you would take this away if
they didn't do it and so on. And
all you're doing is forcing them to censor
media.
So if you're gonna pretend state backed media
is a problem, well, then why then everything
you're doing around the world should be censored
too.
If it can be inconsistent with logic, but
that doesn't apply. Because it's not about logic,
it's about censorship.
Now I wanna play these clips really quickly
about the the the the point in regard
to,
the ADL overlap. This is just our clip
from our interview. Actually a clip from his
documentary, the short one from our interview with,
James Lee and it's about the ADL in
general. But I think these are important to
hear because what he he's sitting there stand
telling you that we have to worry about
how Russia is doing all this. And, yeah,
of course, if the I'm no doubt that's
part of what's happening.
But obvious point is always is how Israel
has so aggressively influenced
not just media, which is obvious, but obviously
the reality around how these groups, essentially spy
agencies, operate with impunity within our country and
threaten Americans
for speech.
And here he is screaming about how these
groups are trying to influence your mind.
YEL is an Israeli spy organization masking around
as a supposed civil rights group and doing
real harm to the Jewish community writ large
in order to run cover for the state
of Israel.
So have the power to monitor social media
activity across all major platforms and change social
media algorithms the way they see fit. Don't
believe me? Well, here's Jonathan Greenblatt, the CEO
of the ADL. We work with YouTube to
have we to get them to change their
algorithms. We work with Facebook on trying to
use a redirect method. So when you search
for holocaust, you get directed to, like, a
Yad Vashem
page. We opened a center in Silicon Valley
back in 2017.
And the woman who runs it, she's the
next Facebook executive.
I have software engineers and data scientists working
at ADL. We're monitoring
all this stuff, and we're working with all
the platforms, by the way. Google and YouTube
and Meta and Twitter and Yep. Reddit and
Steam and Amazon, all these companies. From, like,
Apple to Zoom, we work with all of
them. Right up until this moment, by the
way. Macarena was not secret about that. They
are partnered with the ADL right now.
Free speech.
Some might call that a conspiracy fact.
Just saying. And if their ability to influence
big tech and media isn't disturbing enough,
the ADL also partners with payment platforms like
PayPal to monitor online transactions
and cancel payment processing for those whose speech
they disapprove of. Just to understand this, is
this simply a research effort or is the
ultimate goal, I imagine, to effectively defund them,
which is to say that PayPal would effectively
turn off the spigot or at least turn
off the ability for them to fundraise using
PayPal? That's correct, Andrew.
Yeah. You remember we got stolen 6,000 they
stole $6,000 from our PayPal account. Never gave
it back. And I never even followed up
on that. Appear just recently, apparently, they just
sent me a thing saying they concluded it.
I'm like, oh, good. Only 5 years later,
you've concluded your investigation, and no money came
back to me. And, of course, it simply
said, yeah. You're wrong and you're bad and
we're not gonna give it back. Just didn't
say anything about the money. The point is
that it it's illegitimate
from top to bottom. They are a criminal
organization. And let's not forget who started the
PayPal mafia. That's the Musk and the feel
and the same people who are just about
to regain
very clear power over your life or at
least the illusion of it because it was
already there. Like, the illusion being the election
and that whole process, but they are clearly
being pushed into that position right this moment.
That should worry you. And the bottom line
or either the ending point for the segment
and I I had this up. I I
don't wanna have to search it out, so
I just quickly pulled this up. I think
Orwell sent me a a post about this.
Right now, apparently, PayPal was censoring Palestinians in
a pretty flag flagrant way. I'll include this
search for you guys to look at it.
I think it's it's important to see. This
has been ongoing for a long time, and
now in real time they are stealing money
from Palestinians who are getting money and support
from people around the world.
You know, because freedom and and and democracy,
right?
Include that for you.
Now,
Elon Musk, I'm a I wanna go through
this reasonably quickly but, of course, in my
opinion, this is the least important part of
today's show so that's probably okay. Elon Musk
points out, not this explicit part of it,
but the latter part we're gonna get into,
but he points out this voter registration point
that I wanna include.
Illegal voter registration in in Oregon.
Andy knows, says Oregon DMV has admitted to
registering at least a 100 of non citizen
citizens to vote since 2021,
which actually I I think I might put
this off for a deeper conversation in the
next show, but the simple point is, I
mean, obviously, we should care about this, which
I've said from the very beginning.
Like, it's obvious to see that there is
a weird dynamic happening here. Now from my
perspective, as I somebody who sees this as
just your government and not some left right
game where they're bottling each other, which I
just think is childishly obviously not true.
Point is that they wanna claim that this
is somehow about the democrats stealing votes. The
bottom line is I think this is clearly
about convincing you to drive in a certain
direction. Now whatever you think I'm I'm only
saying that so you know my opinion. Regardless
of what I think, it's obvious to see
that there is a point in which as
I've never been different, I've I've always claimed
made clear about this, but there's a manipulation
of the of the voting dynamic around
whether it's illegal immigrants voting or any or
voting more than once. I mean, guys, this
has been here forever. Forever. And I also
think it's pretty ridiculous to claim we somehow
know what immigrants will vote. The democrats want
more votes. I don't think I actually frankly
think it goes the other. It's a mixed
bag. I don't think it's as simple as
saying immigrants vote for democrats anymore. I think
that's changed a long time ago. That's why
I think they just go with the same
old narrative. My point in all this is
saying is that in Oregon, they're acting like,
whoops. We made a mistake. And there's this
whole open where they're basically
give basically giving people who came in the
country and were given a certain status, but
were still technically not citizens,
driver's licenses, which allowed them to potentially vote.
The main point in all this when you
read through the actual article, which they, of
course, don't mention right here, is that it
was so a a a single digits
actually ended up voting.
Now, of course, you can call that a
lie, but that's where you come back to
the point that I always point out where
if you are assuming into the story that
you want to be true and the only
fact there is the assumption, then you should
probably put it down until you can prove
it. But either way, the point is simply
that the narrative or the information around it
shows that they they got all these driver's
licenses, but nobody actually acted on it.
That's interesting to me. Nonetheless, the point is
there is a clear problem, but where do
you know you know where this is driving.
You know why Elon Musk is pointing to
this. Because they're all trying to convince you
into the idea of the save act, which
Massie let the cat out of the bag.
The SAVE Act will not have any effect
on this election regardless.
Whether or not it actually ends up being
there, I'm convinced that it will be either
way. Well, after the fact, and it'll all
be about driving you into the Trojan horse
of digital ID. I'm convinced completely about that.
But, yeah, I'm gonna I'm gonna go I
was gonna read a whole bunch from this
article. It's interesting. I'm gonna go into this
more in-depth. There's points to be made about
1, how, you know, whether this could be
a partisan dynamic from Oregon and the and
the the DMV,
you know, choosing to, oops, make errors in
order to make this happen. I mean, I'll
go through it. It's it's interesting. The overall
point for me though is that, yes, there's
a real issue here. Yes. We should care
if illegal citizen or, you know, illegal immigrants
are
either being put to vote or are choosing
to vote because that's not the law.
But that doesn't mean we need the Save
Act. You could do the Save Act without
the digital ID part. You can do I
mean, with the Biden side of it, the
mobile driver's license is just gonna be done
to step take the first step. The Save
Act will basically complete that. You'll have no
other option. And then they'll point to each
other as always.
Now JD Vance said if you were to
ask what caused me to change my tune
about Trump,
I could give you a few reasons. But
what we're seeing from Springfield
really drives it home, which we're gonna talk
about next.
And he gets into this, you know, not
nothing about the animals, just kind of an
appoint about what's going on in Springfield.
Zaid says Springfield was declining for years until
they saw an increase in jobs and growth
driven by people moving in. Now this is
again, this is well before
what we're talking about right now. That's that
means more wealth, healthier budget, etcetera. And he
says and this is just in their opinion.
Are there no upsides to immigration in your
view?
What about pair what anyway, I'm I'm just
rapidly going through this to the points at
the bottom.
JD Vance says, dude, I've always liked you,
so maybe this should be a long conversation,
but come on. Are there no upsides immigration
is a radically different question from should we
drop 20,000 people on radically different culture in
a small town. That's a good point.
That's this is one of the important things
to think about. The the the dynamics of
this location is incredible.
That's that's, like, I think that's more than
half of what the population was before this
or somewhere around there. There's no way in
what in any world where that logically makes
sense.
And that very I the the point is
there's no way around it. That is something
that is being done for somebody's interest if
not some political game. I'm very clearly convinced
that there's an overwhelming obvious agenda for weaponized
migration that Israel is openly driving.
Your governments are allowing this. Ask yourself why
the republican in in Ohio allowed this to
happen and allowed I mean, there's conversations about
what he has going on outside of the
country and the overlap they're in. That is
being driven by Israel.
And Israel has a very clear insight to
the republican conversation. My point is that why
is that happening? Are the question you should
be asking.
Instead of blaming random individuals, you should ask
why your government's allowing a foreign government to
do this to you.
Then the point is Jimmy points out something
important.
He says the part you're leaving out
is that those Haitian refugees are created by
oligarchs,
western economic hitman and imperialism.
To they love to see workers turn on
even poorer, more desperate people instead of turning
their attention to the people who created those
refugees in the first place. Kamala Harris is
busy creating more Haitian refugees as people lash
out at their neighbors instead of the oligarchs
who are creating them. You should point this
out. He won't. That's my point. Trump and
you would be doing us a service if
you pointed out what the root cause of
the problem is instead of focusing on the
result, which makes people turn on the desperate
refugees
US economic hitman and imperialism created.
Right? This point is, you know, I guess,
naively assuming that these people care about any
of that, or that they're just confused about
the reality.
These people are actively stoking hatred against a
certain group of people for their political interest.
That's that's not even up for debate. That's
not a left wing racist point. It's just
simply what's going on. They are lying about
an entire grouping of people. We'll go into
this next. That's not to say that there
aren't people out there eating animals. The point
is that they're using this to hype an
entire conversation
for regime change, for the election, for Israel,
for a whole number of things we'll go
through.
But here's my point.
I said, great point, Jimmy. And therein lies
the 2 party illusion grift.
They'll never address it since
I'm a go back real quick so I
don't forget this secondary comment I wanted to
read.
Here. Here we go.
So I said they'll never address it since
all sides have an interest in maintaining the
foreign policy to immigration pipeline.
They turn us against ourselves,
which only benefits the power structure and maintains
the status quo.
Alright. So my point is they're you're pleading
with them to address something they know they're
ignoring. They want you to think it's simple.
They want you to think it's the left
doing it. They want the left, want you
to think the right doesn't care about them.
The bottom line is they both allow this
dynamic. They allow their foreign policy to drive
immigration, and they both use it against you.
And then you turn around and realize Israel's
paying them all to ignore it anyway.
And driving it in for their own interests.
The bottom line
is that this is something that needs to
be addressed before all of it.
And that will never ever ever happen.
Neither Trump nor Vance nor any they're not
going to acknowledge this because it ultimately shows
they're all of them are part of this
problem. It's foreign policy. It's their belligerent wars
that they hand from one party to the
next that never stop.
That's the point. Trump's gonna end the forever
war. No. He's not. He's a part of
this.
That's one of these lies that Ritter's gonna
go, please, I hope that's the one. They're
all hoping. And I understand why they would
want that. I hope it's true too. I'm
just not gonna pretend that his words have
any meaning based on all of the things
he's lied about.
And both of them, all sides. But this
person says,
so to be clear, again, my point is
they'll never address this
address it, it being the immigration
to foreign policy pipeline.
He says one side is saying they're gonna
deport them all.
I guess that's not the same as addressing
it.
And forgive my frustration because this is everything
we're dealing with today. And I said
I should've we are I should've have an
apostrophe there.
We we are quite obviously damn it. I
hate typos. Referring to addressing the US government,
all of it,
foreign policy, the
referring to addressing the US government foreign policy
to immigration pipeline
that Jimmy is outlining.
Incredible how to to to me how the
partisanship hears and reads what it wants to.
His point, he's trying to act like I'm
like, one side's gonna get rid of all
these people.
That's not addressing it, I guess. And I'm
like, you didn't even hear the point. All
you can fixate on is bad immigrants.
My point was they wanna address the immigration
to foreign foreign policy immigration pipeline,
not just get rid of the immigrants because
it's just so do you see my point?
Like, how do you not read what I'm
saying? Oh, you read what I'm saying and
you hear immigrants bad or vice versa that
none of them should be like, that they're
all good. You know, it's just like it's
just such a silly dynamic.
None of them will address the fact that
their foreign policy, all of them, is the
reason this exists
because they don't want it to stop. And
I just wish that people could be honest
about that, but the party politics rule the
day.
Now I don't do I do wanna play
this, then we're gonna I'm gonna try to
rapidly finish this because it's it's important to
see but, you know, lesser importance of all
that's going on. But here's a great clip
from Chris Hedges that I wanted you to
hear because it is. It's this is the
2 party game.
Our political class does not govern. It entertains.
It plays its assigned role in our fictitious
democracy,
howling with outrage to constituents and selling them
out. The squad and the progressive caucus have
no more intention of fighting for universal
health care workers' rights or define the war
machine than the freedom caucus fights for freedom.
These political hacks are modern versions of Sinclair
Lewis' slick con artist, Elmer Gantry,
cynically betraying a gullible public to amass personal
power and wealth.
This moral vacuity provides the spectacle as h
g Wells wrote of a great material civilization
halted, paralyzed.
It happened in ancient Rome. It happened in
our Germany. It is happening here.
Governance exists,
but it is not seen.
It is certainly not democratic.
It is done by the armies of lobbyists
and corporate executives from the fossil fuel industry,
the arms industry, the pharmaceutical
industry, and Wall Street. Governance happens in secret.
Corporations have seized the levers of power.
Growing obscenely rich, the ruling oligarchs have deformed
national institutions,
including state and federal
legislatures and the courts to serve their insatiable
greed. They know what they are doing. They
understand the depths of their own corruption.
They know they are hated.
They are prepared for that too. They have
militarized police forces and have built a vast
archipelago of prisons to keep the unemployed and
underemployed in bondage. All the while, they pay
little or no income tax and exploit sweatshop
labor overseas.
They lavishly bankroll the political clowns who speak
in the vulgar and crude idiom of an
enraged public or in the dulcet tones used
to mollify the liberal class.
And when they see one of their political
puppets faltering as Joe Biden was, they step
in, cut off the funds, and stage a
party coup. The media plays its anointed role
in this farce as courtiers to the powerful
amplifying their fictitious narratives and lies.
There are only a handful who call them
out.
It's a good clip.
There's more. He goes on, obviously. Right? He
goes on to talk about but the point
is that he clearly sees it. Right? The
idea of the illusion of the whole dynamic.
I just it's important to see that more
and more people are finding the courage to
call this out at its core.
That has to be seen. We need to
be clear about how important this is. Whether
or not you feel that voting might still
have the bottom line is we'd still regardless
of that dynamic that I think is a
complete farce that is and should and will
be paramount in an actual representative government, which
is not what we're living through,
I we need to stand up and make
this clear.
This will not change until we do so.
Now I wanna finish with talking about Haiti,
as well as Honduras, by the way. And
I'm gonna include
just some of these past articles about this
from, you know, 2019 forward. US mercenaries caught
in Haiti, remembering that this was this is
not a new reality of US military personnel
being used to overthrow, destabilize. And but realize,
there there hasn't been an election, I think,
since 2016. Funny how they don't care about
democracy in Haiti because they're getting what they
want. But they'll scream about democracy in places
that just had an election because they don't
like who's in control. These people are illegitimate
corrupt liars.
Haitian authorities arrest Americans transporting cash of weapons
amid uprising. This was Alex Rubinstein back in
2,019.
Here is 2024.
This is my my show from
March 10, 24. Haiti chaos,
Israel's blood diamonds.
We talk about the reality of that.
We also talk about the idea that Haiti
was fighting to end western exploitation and being
framed for the opposite. That's all been building.
It's been chaos for a while now. This
is February.
Now let's talk about this this this article's
in it's important.
Did I not
oh, dang it.
I'm really
pretty certain that I forgot to grab the
screenshot of this text, but let's read through
it for as much as we can. It's
gonna take too long to do that. Damn
it. Well, this was a great article. The
outsourcing of Haiti. How US intervention laid the
groundwork for the crisis of today.
Bottom line is exactly what the title says.
Right? The idea that we're the US government
has been exploiting Haiti as long as it's
been as long as it's been had its
finger in the pie. And it is absolutely
laying the groundwork for what's happening now, or
it did, and now they're exploiting it yet
again for many different reasons. Now the point
is the overlapping of the story we're hearing
is is a combination of things in my
opinion. One, just political advantage using it because
it may it's something that could've distracted or
lied. You know, the point as well as
the fact that it's dehumanizing
immigrants
in a general sense and dehumanizing the conversation
about any it's a political game. But on
top of that, I think it's can I
my argument overall of this with Honduras and
Haiti is I think that they're about to
conduct some kind of a power shift in
both and that's one of the reasons that's
happening?
Because what do you do in all of
these dynamics? Anything they've ever done like this,
the first thing they do or, you know,
in one of the first things they do
is dehumanize the population.
And right now what you're seeing more than
anything is creating a mindset that these people
are gross, they're
they're creepy, whatever it is. They're eating animals
and they're voodoo and whatever. That's it's you're
taking a a fringe part of the population
and you're making every single person that exists
there. Infowars across the board, all of them.
They're all doing it. And it's disgusting.
Even we'll get into the actual claims, which
even them, they're being
we'll get into it all. But the point
here is that this is a long form
manipulation.
Now it says on August 19th, the state
department and the treasury levied levied financial sanctions
against Haiti's former president, Michael Martelly, for his
alleged role in drug trafficking, money laundering, and
sponsoring Haiti based gangs.
In many ways, the news was a long
time coming. Martelly has already come under sanctions
in other nations and faced global condemnation.
Still, Washington's move against him came as a
surprise main to main to many. The former
president had a long standing relationship with the
US and has spent much of the past
30 years in Florida. Now this is a
classic point about how the per the ally
of today for the US government becomes the
scapegoat of tomorrow. Now this is a person
or, you know, and it could go a
lot of different ways where they just get
tired of using him. He's not useful anymore.
Or maybe he starts to want a little
bit more than they wanna give him and
suddenly he's a bad guy. The bottom line
is this is a person that they put
in position as far as I can tell.
And that's what we talked about before. And
that's he's living comfortably in Florida and they're
having their chaos taking place. Now the point
is the new sanctions serve as much as
a condemnation of past US policy
as they do of Martelly himself. Since the
2021 assassination of Moise, the former president the
former leader, that's Martelly's successor,
Haiti has descended into chaos, politically instability, and
and and violence. Army and armed groups, including
some that Martelly allegedly supported,
now control large swaths of the capital. Right?
So you it's just the same game as
always. Through the people they support, they allow
the chaos, they use the chaos to justify
what they want. Don't care about the people
they claim they're trying to fight for. The
country has not had an election, yeah, since
2016 when Martelly left office.
An unelected transnational
or transitional government holds power, which once again
with strong US international support. And so why
would they this is my point about all
these different overlapping points, technocracy, Honduras.
Why do they want some kind of a
structure where they have to pretend some democratic
process when they can just do something like
this? When they can say, we have a
transnational
a transitional government
that dictates our and and what does that
mean? Some kind of a global act I
mean, that's what we're talking about with techno
technocratic global construct where they can say, we're
dictating power forever based on the fact that
you guys can't get it together. Sounds like
a Palestinian point in general where they say,
you guys are just too crazy. We have
to do it for you, except they're the
ones that made it happen.
The point is the US government is dictating
this outcome. That's the reality.
This person says in their book, aid state,
they show how the Haitian state and its
corresponding political and economic systems have been shaped
as much by foreign intervention and aid as
by the patient people themselves.
What does that mean? That means that foreign
entities have used this and extorted them, taken
it from the aid that they claim they're
giving them, and have shaped the country in
their interest and their not in the what
the Haitian people want.
Despite the fact that they got all that
money and resources and aid on the back
of what they claim they needed.
That's I mean, might as well be terrorism
in the form of aid.
That story begins in January 2010 when Haiti
suffered an earthquake. We've talked about this. This
is when the Clinton found the Clintons
moved in like vultures and took advantage of
suffering people.
It says they they're led by the US.
The international community
pledged more than 10,000,000,000 to, hey, look at
that. Build back better.
All the way back then. As the mantra
at the time went, Martelly, a popular musician
known as Sweet Mickey, known for performing,
basically,
one, a deeply flawed electoral process.
Or rather it says, known for performing nothing,
finished third and didn't flood process.
And they ultimately forced him into power. Now
it says, in the aftermath of disaster, with
the billions on the line, international community wanted
to make sure the country's next leader wouldn't
be an obstacle to its plans. You know,
otherwise known as democracy. Right? So the US
along with the local United Nations office and
the Organization of American States, the very group
that allowed the coup to take place in
Bolivia under a guise of democracy And as
they point out, a hemispheric body that receives
the majority of its funding from the US
intervened, of course.
Following the vote, United Nations officials told members
of Haiti's election council that it would not
allow the runner-up
to advance to the runoff
regardless of the results. You know, again, democracy.
The OAS sent a team to audit the
results and without conducting an analysis,
recommended overturning the results.
And, of course, then placed their guy into
the election.
Democracy.
While Martelly was a political neophyte, meaning he
doesn't know anything about politics,
he had strong standing with the Haiti military
and right wing forces. And it after even
admitting he'd been part of the Tonton,
McCourtis,
the Duvalet plea, probably dictator's deadly militia. Despite
this, Washington remained instead
invested in Martelly,
threatening to withhold its post earthquake assistance if
the government didn't comply. And you see, there's
the aid manipulation.
You put the person we want who will
give us money back. You let us use
this money for our benefit in your country,
or we won't give it to you at
all.
And then, of course, sending Hillary Clinton, which
is to their you know, the absolute destruction
of Haiti more than anything,
to deal with all this.
In 2 1011, the electoral
council declared Martelly the winner of the runoff,
surprise surprise, with 1,000,000,000. So this is the
guy that's a a performer. Another actor turned
politician. Isn't that funny how it works? Or
better a singer, I guess.
With 1,000,000,000 in foreign aid flowing in after
the earthquake, much of the Haitian state had
been effectively outsourced to the aid state.
The Martelly wash and the and Martelly, Washington
knew, would keep it that way. In 2012,
following a ceremony inaugurating a new industrial park,
the flagship reconstruction project of the international community,
Clinton called him the country's chief dreamer and
believer.
It's disgusting. In this accept excerpt, he dives
into long standing ties between Martelli and drug
trafficking organizations. As well as the narco industry's
coercive influence over Haitian politics. All of which
they are okay with it aloud, but will
call out in the countries they don't like.
Even though it's not even rar largely happening
even less. Especially to the same degree, like
in Colombia or these low like, in this
case, Haiti.
Only when Haitians have elected a political leader
opposed to the
US opposed by the US have concerns over
any of this ever materialized publicly. So the
point is they don't care about drug trafficking
as long as they have persons people in
place that they like.
When there's a government friendly toward the US
and western interest, those narco connections always seem
to fade in the background. Exactly my point.
By supporting Martelly and then the violence and
corruption plagued electoral process at the end of
the term, the US in many ways paved
the way for the multifaceted crisis afflicting Haiti
today.
I think that's the set of the right
there,
Yeah, I mean, I I don't wanna read
it all. I I I obviously we're well
past our time today. Let's make it a
5 hour show today. What do you say?
The bottom line is clearly that they laid
the groundwork for what this is.
I'm I'll include the article from,
myself. I wrote this back in 2017.
Doctor who exposed Clinton Foundation,
corruption in Haiti, found dead. And again, this
is crazy, by the way. This guy was
screaming about how Clintons were stealing all of
the money.
Saying one like, this doctor went there, and
her guys are helping
people. And he says he says, disaster management
was nonexistent. There's supposed to be 1,000,000,000 of
dollars flying around. Nonexistent.
Cheerios on the tarmac are not getting it
done. He says, once we arrived, we saw
severely damaged hospital with no running water, limited
electrical power, supplied by a generator.
Yeah. 1,000,000,000 of dollars, they were robbing them
blind.
Surgeries ring performed with the equivalent of a
large storage closet. It gets really disgusting, guys.
They found patients with
with pus dripping out of her open extremities,
fractions and injuries, maggots in their wounds. It's
horrifying.
He woke up about this and said the
Clintons are lying. And guess what? He committed
suicide.
What what a shocking story.
Unreal.
Now,
Zarifa Media points out an important overlap here.
At the center of Haiti's collapse stands the
richest its richest man. Oligarch Gilbert Bigayo.
A figure with deep ties, of course, to
Israel. Surprise, surprise. And a hand in the
nation's chaos. His fortune has fueled Haiti's violent
gangs, pushing the country to the brink. Gilbert
Bigayo owns Port Lafito
and is Haiti's honorary consul to Israel.
Bagayo was sanctioned by the Canadian government after
a revelation showed that Port Lafito,
which he owns,
is the entry point of all the Kalashnikovs,
m sixteens, and other weapons used by Haitian
gangs.
Guys, this is not unique.
The the tide is real. This is how
it goes everywhere.
It's not just Israel, but you have to
recognize, the US government and Israel are manufacturing
these things.
You remember all the weapons and mesh and
and Uzis that were used in the Rwanda
genocide were get were supplied by Israel. Their
own media covered this. They were explicitly involved
before, during, and after the genocide just like
they were involved before, during, and after the
final solution.
The Zionists were working alongside the Nazis. It's
publicly discussed. It's on Wikipedia for crying out
loud. Well, apparently, racist for pointing this out.
Then you can ask yourself why it makes
sense for them to claim they created the
state of Israel to fight against the thing
they were involved with. At the very least,
working alongside the group that did it.
I know that's super contentious despite how easy
it is to prove. It's crazy. Right? The
bottom line is this is what you keep
seeing.
He says, but there's a deeper connection to
the story with connections to, guess what, Jeffrey
Epstein. Because that all connects. And quiet backing
from US interest, we have a we we
have to ask, is this all by design?
As Haiti's resources are plundered and as people
suffer, the mass migration to the US looks
less like a coincidence and more like a
strategy.
I should I should have grabbed this earlier.
This article is important.
Let me see if this pops up. I'll
play this clip again if it pops up.
Let's see.
This one?
It happens every time. Let me explain it.
Yep. There it is. Perfect.
So first,
we talked about this, August 16th. Weaponized migration
and experimentation.
Tools for subversion, division, and manufactured consent. Explicitly
talking about how Israel is doing this, by
the way. And I'll play this clip again,
since I guess we're not trying to rush
anymore. Apparently, I forgot already.
Let's play this because it's important.
Now this is a clip that Adam Green
put out
where a a few different rabbis are basically
speaking on the record about how this is
a, you know, weapon weaponized migration. This at
the very least is being
stoked
by Israel
in order to justify the end times or
rationalize you know, drive in the end. However
you wanna see what they think is happening
here. We have to recognize how clearly this
is part of it. And what we just
showed you is undeniable. Israel, the United States
interest going back a long time,
and what they're doing is causing the driving
of migration, which happens everywhere. Same thing happened
on Honduras 2009 with the US Baku. The
same thing happened in Syria and Abkhari everywhere.
And then they point to those very people
and claim that they're the problem.
End of days,
you're gonna need the
iron of
Hisav,
which represents Edom, which is the West,
Europe, and the Americas,
to get intermixed
with
Ishmael, which is basically Arabs and and Muslims.
How in the world was this ever gonna
happen if not for this refugee crisis? At
the end of days, you're gonna have this
intermixing between Esav,
Edom, which is the West, and the East,
which is the Muslims and the,
and the Arabs,
making this through this influx into the world.
They're gonna have a far larger
birth rate than the indigenous people there, and
they're going to sort of conquer by number.
And there are many different sources for this.
Here's the point. What a lot of people
point in this conversation and talk about the
idea that this
is the the the great replacement conversation.
But what's interesting is that this is not
being then blamed on the people that are
publicly saying this needs to happen.
The Israeli conversation. I mean, I'm talking I
I I would just I wouldn't just point
at a random rabbi and make the point.
My point is this is being stated by
multiple rabbis, but it's been publicly discussed by
the smokes which have been gabirs of the
current administration
openly.
All of this prophetic stuff, the heifer, all
of it, they're proudly saying. So my point
is it's not a secret about their intentions
about at least,
well, you could argue well, it should be
objective as possible that they're pointing at it
and saying good because that will drive in
what we want to happen. So you have
to realize that this is something that I
believe they're absolutely stoking or manufacturing.
And, again, there's articles written over the last
50 years about Israel's use of weaponized migration.
Frankly, there's articles written over the last 4
or 5 months pointing out that's what they're
doing right now with Gaza in particular.
But either way, the point is we need
to realize that this is imp around this
is a bigger conversation around driving
in the kind of,
destabilization
through mass migration that then causes what they
say brings on the end times.
There will be many, many people killed and
so on and so forth. So
the idea of having these refugees come into
Europe, it's no longer a matter of whether
it's right or wrong. It's just simply a
fulfillment of what it was meant to be
all wrong. This is the fulfillment of, you
know, the rehazal and the prophecies.
This has to happen, and this is just
another sign that we are nearing, you know,
the completion of the stikhood of the entire
world. But we know one thing, right? That
when it comes to the classic Rome,
you know, which is Europe,
they're finished.
And you don't have to be a prophet
or a
great analysis for that. You have to open
the view, the the the the TV or
the Internet and see that exactly what was
prophesied then, that the sons of Ishmael are
gonna go and cause cause havoc around the
world. So France is completely barbecued.
English Now again, my point is always is
so if this is
why
why are people out of out of what
motivation are people blaming the immigrants themselves?
That's that's the thing I can't wrap my
mind around. Like, I can get how this
can be pointed out where about voting or
about the destabilization of of countries because anybody
from any group, especially with different traditions and
practices, and we of course, it's gonna cause
a problem. 20,000 people in Ohio, that's ridiculous.
But the where does it come in where
they start becoming the focal point of your
rage? Why is it their fault that your
governments and your allies' government's allies have destroyed
their country, stolen from them, starved them to
death, and then deliberately driven them into your
country and it's all their fault to the
point to where you have right wing propagandists
making up entire false narratives about what these
people are and can and if you wanna
argue using historical cases that this is the
I'll get to that about the past this
comes from. And in the and I'll show
you what they're pointing at now to claim
this is happening around the animals. The point
is that why are they focusing on them?
I mean, you can call it hatred. You
can call it racism. You can call it
ignorance. Call it what you want.
That is a part of the story no
matter how much you don't like it. And
it's not to say that that is part
of it does not make you some kind
of left wing, which is just your childish
binary way of viewing things. Those are just
the reality.
Why would they being there be what you
are mad about if you then can acknowledge
that this is something that's I mean, look.
Here's the crazy point. Most of these people
are the ones pointing at the idea of
the great replacement conversation,
then blaming the democrat, essentially, but then still
turning around and saying it's the democrats, and
they're bad, and they're 3rd world. They're gross.
That's the rumors and all these different people
making it out to be how these are
the bad people. How does that even remotely
connect? Even within your own narrative.
Is next. Now half of Europe is completely
com
half did. Now look what's going on in
America.
So, you know, now in a country And
and then the other point to make is
that we have to remember that these are
many, many, many cases of Israel and even
the United States government, Asian provocateurs, but especially
in regard to Palestinians, Israel dressing up like
Palestinians and Hamas and carrying out terrorist attacks.
Their own media has reported on this many
times. So my point is as especially after
we saw the Israeli agent that got caught
at the US border that is the moment
they got exposed, the Republicans stopped talking about
it. That shows you that there is inside
there the people inside of all this that
are being used to cause things they then
blame on the larger conversation.
Near you. Asking what's gonna be with the
Goyim when Moshiach comes. Will they be destroyed
and annihilated?
Someone asked, who cares?
Okay.
As a nation, they'll cease to exist even
as individuals. Every individual,
those survivors.
Not only as a nation, they'll cease to
exist, even as individuals. In modern terminology,
they call it
cultural genocide.
They'll be annihilated as lent as a They
basically learn there's gonna be cultural genocide.
Right? You know what? The Goyim is The
Goyim as they exist as Goyim Befrijatsma,
that's
done with.
Just not just because they're saying that does
not mean that's whatever Israeli or Abu Jew
thinks.
But the reality is, from a from a
power structure point, it is something that's driving
their actions.
So my my point is they've said these
things publicly. Now, this is what I just
talked about from January 28th.
This every the republican conversation freaked out because
this guy said he was from Palestine.
But once you even cared to do your
due diligence, it turned out he was actually
a Mossad a or rather was somebody working
with Mossad from Jordan, and that was a
very important story around the border.
Because if we care about foreign countries using
the border structure and the migrants to secretly
put in people, I guess we only care
if that's allegation against China or Russia. Right?
Or whoever, Mexico. But not when it's Israel
because this story got dropped and nobody brought
it up again in that conversation.
But it got proven though. So it's funny
how when it got proven, you dropped it
because it was about Israel.
We I don't know how that's it's incredible
to me that people can ignore well, I
mean, it's obvious why. Because they're not honest
in this conversation.
Now here's Dan Cohen who I've just set
up an interview with coming up soon about
this and a a few other conversations
who, you know, if you forgot, he was
breaking this down back in March. Remember the
whole point about Jimmy barbecue and all this
nonsense that's pushed out? By by the way,
the same people lying to you today a
lot of different things?
This was they were they made this up.
And I Dan broke this story down. I
myself had a few points that I proved
on this. They were showing that this was
not even remotely what they were claiming. Remember
what the claim was, guys? That he was
eating people in the streets.
Remember that? It wasn't true.
As Dan says, watch this if you want
to know the truth about Haiti.
And he's and he writes, why are we
seeing a sudden disinformation campaign portraying Jim portraying
Jimmy Barbecue as a cannibal?
Watch how he treks through the slums of
Haiti to ignite revolutionary consciousness among the masses
and you'll understand. The point is, just like
we just heard, they've been destabilizing this country
for their own benefit. They're using their mat
the migration to manipulate other countries. And the
point is this guy is standing up and
going, look. We can't allow this. We have
to push back. We have to resist.
And there you go. Now he's the bad
guy. And it's the same point as always.
We love remember Elon loves to make you
when it's the movies, you fight with the
resistance. But when it's the thing they want
you to think about, you don't. Well, here's
the point. You know, the Palestinians are the
resistance. Right? The Houthis, the Ansaral, they're they
are the resistance.
These people are the resistance against the power.
But it's only in the movies when you
side with the resistance
because that's the game. And they love to
point that out when they want you to
think about a selected point, you know, but
this is the reality. These are people who
are actually trying to mobilize the individuals against
authoritarian control.
He says,
he,
shares here, it was his name, Jimmy Barbe
Jimmy Barbeque is is trying to turn
Haiti into a productive and prosperous country that
benefits the whole population. The complete opposite of
the dystopia the US imperialism has created.
The man they're smearing as a savage is
leading a revolution.
I mean, you could with this a 2
minute video, it just breaks this down, showing
here.
It says maybe in the struggle
to liberate this country, people
say we talk too much, and that it's
time for us to take action. We're not
fighting in a hot hot headed way.
He says we know the struggle we're undertaking.
We know where we want to get, damn
it, get
in our struggle.
That's why we tell people wait for
wait for the signal.
He says wait for the revolutionary forces of
the g nine.
That's why every time we tell people onward,
they should follow us because the struggle
we're engaged in it is for them.
That's because they've made people think we are
bandits and gangs.
That's why we tell people onward. They're a
little reticent.
We're engaged in ideological struggle. We're showing people
the reality.
When the people are ready, they'll tell them
onward and they'll follow us.
I mean, you get the point. You know,
the bottom line is that this guy is
pops peeking out all over the place. Dan
Cohen has been investigating and breaking this down
with far more than just some flimsy video
on TikTok and some allegations for people you
can't verify, which is all that ultimately amounts
to this last time. And it was very
quickly shown to be completely false.
Here he is pointing out what Alice Jones
is saying today.
Saying and so Alice Jones is saying as
of 12th,
this is a Haitian voodoo ritual.
They don't just eat cats for food, they
do it because they believe it gives them
magical powers. Now there is a level of
overlap to that statement in regard to what
voodoo actually is or other versions of the
similar thing that people ignorantly call all voodoo.
The point is, as even in this country,
by the way, these things are, in some
cases, religiously protected. Not randomly killing animals in
the streets or inhumanely killing animals in general.
But I'll get you in a point. Just
it's important to understand the fuller picture here
about what gets chosen to be manipulated by
the partisan narratives. But the point is, he's
making this out to be this is what
they all believe if you actually watch his
content. The man in the video, he says,
is drinking the cat's blood. Now the point
is Dan saying it's not true.
This is getting deleted, so be sure to
copy it. Repost and share it. Don't forget
the con corporate media and democrats tell you
this practice. See, that's the point. That is
a marching order to say, no matter what
comes out, no matter how few and flimsy
the facts are,
it's all because they don't want you to
know it.
This is what all of them do.
Right? So you set them up to say,
what if they here's they just so showed
me facts that prove it's not true. So
that's the lie from the Democrats. So I'm
gonna ignore that. I'm gonna say, you're the
truth. Even the video's gone. We're just gonna
protect the point is it becomes
the talk it's the memeification.
Jones said it. Here's a claim. We're gonna
go with that because Democrats bad.
That's not even the majority in my opinion,
but it's happening across the board in regard
to the parties the the team support politics.
Dan Cohen says this is not a a
Haitian voodoo ritual. I can't talk. Haitian voodoo
ritual,
Which I can guarantee you he knows more
than Alex Jones about this topic. And and
this disturbing video clearly is not from Haiti.
And this is the important part. Unfortunately, it
is now deleted, which is probably by design.
It says it's not from Haiti as the
voice in the background is not speaking Haitian
Creole.
But, you know, facts and due diligence don't
seem to matter to Alex. Alex Jones is
lying, he says. He's no better than the
shady Democrats he opposes. He just plays for
the red team instead of the blue team.
Again, as you could tell, Dan gets it.
The idea of the 2 party illusion.
He says, if real Alex Jones
actually believes in anything and that's his tag.
If Alex Jones believes in anything, he investigate
what's actually happening in Haiti as I have.
Instead, he's lying to get Trump elected.
And on that note, I'll play this clip
again
since it it is relevant to the lack
of due diligence. I am going to share
a community story from our friend Richard Grove
when he was at the Infowars studio
behind the scenes because of his documentary that
he just felt making state of mind. And
the commentary that he gave observing that studio
firsthand
was that they don't check their facts. They
basically just run with it, and they do
it way too fast. It's the same reason
that, like, David Knight left the organization because
he didn't go back off with it. Fucking
Drew street kids. Yeah. Yeah. So that's the
thing. It's like, it's a nonstop thing. He's
been like this for so fucking long. It's
maddening.
It's it's just ridiculous. For for a number
of reasons, but, you know, after the loose
with what was going on was one of
the reasons Burmas gave for leaving Infowars back
in the day too.
I mean, you know, what's this is secondhand,
but the reality is that Richard Growe did
say that. Burmas did say that. TrueStream did
say that the point is these are people
with some pretty good standing in this community.
Right? That have that have been doing this
a long time. Night, obviously. I he said
that on the interview with me.
Talk talking about drones and sugar water and
the lies, and that's why I hate to
leave. The point is these people are very
well respected. At what point do we stand
back and go and it's it's it's just
you make your own mind up. If it's
just entertain infotainment, which is it? That's he's
got it all over there. The bottom line
is that the reality of the history, the
lack of due diligence of a lot of
the mainstream alternative media, as David Icke would
point out, is flagrant. And yet it all
just keeps drifting forward.
There's what Dan says in regard to that
other thread we showed you from JD Vance
saying, there's no doubt that suddenly and this
is important because Dan this, this same thing
I've said the whole time as well. Because
people love to misrepresent this as somehow that
you're, like, okay with
flooding the immigrants. I've I've been clear about
that from the beginning. It simply does not
that's why I like that gumball video. It
simply shows you that what they're trying to
do in regard to moving them in is
just illogical. It doesn't make any sense. It's
not gonna actually solve the problem. That's my
point. They don't want to solve it. It's
using these people and you by hating them
and calling them the bad guy is working
for their agenda.
He says there's no doubt that suddenly importing
and, by the way, one other point, in
no way is that to say that they
shouldn't be held accountable. Again, this game that
gets played where they fill in the blank
with the assumption that they want you to
the if people commit crimes, they should go
to jail. Nope. Nobody honest would ever say
otherwise, whether immigrant or not. If somebody's raping
somebody or committing a crime, put them in
prison. Deport them. But the reality is that
that's not the full picture of what's actually
going on. You get these hype stories about
individual things many times end up being something
they show you even though it happened 4
years ago or well before this, which we're
gonna get into next, all over the place.
But on top of that, the reality
that these people
the in the case in regard to committing
crimes,
the way that they're framing it is somehow
that they're the agenda is to allow them
to destroy and commit crimes. And if you
think that's the case, my point is the
same as before.
Why are you blaming them?
Why wouldn't you blame the power structure that's
allowing that? And if you think it's just
the Democrats, you're blind.
Because the same immigration things,
the problems and care events, based on foreign
policy have happened all through left and right
administrations.
There's just a different narrative that gets you
thinking differently.
But he goes on to say, there's no
doubt that suddenly importing tens of thousands of
foreigners into a small town will have dramatic
consequences and in day engender resentment from the
residents. And and and there's going to be
bad people in there.
If you take 20,000 people, you're gonna have
a rapist and a murderer and a thief.
That's just that's the world we live in.
There will be people that will choose to
do that. And look, on top of that,
you're gonna have people that know that they're
only in that position because of your government's
actions. So they're gonna be a little bit
more little more quick little quicker to break
the law. I'm not justifying it. I'm just
saying that's why it might happen. Now it
says, but pretending this starts at the border
is naive
at best and disingenuous.
Permanent Washington
has long meddled in Haiti's affairs via invasions,
occupations,
multiple coups, and is now in gen in
in engineering another military occupation of Haiti. That's
my point. With 100 of millions of American
tax dollars,
If we'd stop destabilizing
countries under the guise of democracy,
then we wouldn't have these immigration crises. Now
I wouldn't say that exactly. I think that
this is being driven from multiple points, but
I do agree that's a huge factor.
He says, fine. To finish, will you pledge,
if elected, to abandon the Biden administration's policy
of meddling in Haitian affairs? Of course. Nothing.
That's my point.
Big opportunity right there to be like, yes.
That's the problem. I agree. We'll stop that
on the 1st day. Of course not. Because
as I said to Jimmy's point, none of
them will is to acknowledge that because all
of them are using it. That's the 2
party illusion for you. And the, the rest
of the policies keep you divided and hating
people that are just being used as well.
Simple.
Now
looks like we might be going to 5
hours today. That might be a record. You
let me know. I forget. But let's I
wanna let's finish this off. So the point
is, as you don't if you don't remember
this ridiculous story start didn't start here, but
this is where it got its prominence and
it it's it blew out of control right
after this statement. Just don't wanna talk about
it because they're so embarrassed by it. In
Springfield,
they're eating the dogs, the people that came
in. They're eating the cats. They're eating
they're eating the pets.
You know what I love about that? I
mean, her laughing is just because whether she
knows about it, whether she doesn't care, it
worked because it made him look stupid, which
is all they do. These are lying politicians
who will say whatever they need to say
in that moment to get the win. If
you haven't seen that by now, if you
think one's different than the other, you're not
paying attention in my opinion. But what I
think is funny is the the way he
responds, it kinda doubles down. I just my
feeling is that and I think it's very
clear. She had him on the back foot
the whole time in regard to her saying,
I think it made him and I was
gonna say win or lose. I mean, I
think they both lost, so that's my whole
point. They're both look pretty dumb in this
thing. But what's funny is that he I
think he was clearly affected by your statements.
Like, felt angry because she was making him
feel small. And his hubris, I think, runs
his life in my opinion. Frankly, read his
books. It's pretty obvious. But my point is
watch her laugh and the way he redoubles
down. I think it's funny. They're eating the
dogs, the people that came in. They're eating
the cats. They're eating
they're eating the pets
of the people that live there. And this
is what's happening in our country.
Yeah. Okay. So the boy is, he says
this. Right? So here's what's important.
The way that this actually began is pretty
interesting.
Apparently, right now, the story is coming out
that the the woman who shared this first,
it turns out she regrets it because it
was based on something she couldn't prove. Now
that does seem to be the reality, but
who knows if that person was pressured to
do it. Now the guardian was arguing and
a lot of the republican
support,
administration for Trump were openly claiming that Loomer
in the plane ride with Trump was where
he got that from. I actually think that's
what happened. Whether or not the first claim
came from that lady,
the reason this was put in his ear,
I think, was because of Lumer. Now I
have a interesting thought or just a question
to consider about whether that might be another
driving angle from Israel. Lumer is a a
screaming Zionist manipulator. So the point
is that
this might be a larger point about driving
the dehumanization, about driving I mean, all this
stuff. That's just completely subjective. That's I I
have nothing to back that up. It's my
personal opinion. But I think it's interesting to
think about how all these different lines can
connect. You'll see what I mean as we
go through this. Now the point is starting
on the I think it's 10th or 11th.
Daily Mail wrote this article. Now clearly a
lot has happened since then, but this is
11th.
And the title is the truth behind viral
rumors that led to Trump's migrant pet eating
claims, how unproven reports, which was the case
at the time and still is for almost
everything. That was my point in the first
place.
My never did I say in this that
I like, even right now, I still think
large of the story is manipulation and false.
But I'm not saying there is no evidence
or that there's no case where this might
have happened. Same thing I said in the
first place.
At this time, and the same thing generally
right now, I'll show you, is that all
we have are evidence points, but not proof.
We've got angles of different unproven claims, most
of which are either now shown to be
false, shown to be 4 years ago or
last year. I'll go over all of them.
That alone needs to make you go, okay.
Wait a minute. If most of what they're
dumping into the conversation is incorrect or assumption,
then maybe even if it is real, we
should step back and go, what's going on
here? Right? In real in the sense of,
like, one example or one case. The point
is
at this time, there was nothing other than
assumption that made the case.
Both the Republican leader and the council entity
were saying it wasn't true, and the point
is that, nonetheless, it was still being pushed
by all of them. Danz and Trump and
Lumer, and, aggressively.
My point at the time was if you
were going along with that, you were part
of the problem even if it ended up
being true because you don't know that neither
do they. Just because you assume correctly does
not mean it was right to assume.
Now it says within a few years and
then there's the points I wanted to highlight
in all this. Because a lot of it
in here gets into, like, the, you'll see.
Just other points we we could go over.
But this is important to consider. Within a
few years,
under any kind of the stories about what
the struggles of of the Springfield to and
what they were dealing with. Apparently, most everybody
in the area was well before the migrant
influence in influx were struggling. And they they
were losing all of their high skilled people
and, you know, and drug addiction, all sorts
of problems.
At least as this is reporting from the
Daily Mail. Now it says within a few
years, after deciding they were gonna bring in
migrants to kinda fill the roles of job
vacancies,
within a few years, 20,000.
That's what it says. 20,000 immigrants arrived,
Swelling Springfield's population, which was only 58,000.
Guys, that's absurd.
So a little bit less than half, actually.
That's crazy. I mean, yeah, that is going
to, without question,
change the entire dynamic of this kind of
this area. Now, look, I can understand from
a perspective of wanting to fill gaps of
jobs,
but this is not the choice of the
government if we are still pretending that the
people are the ones that are voting and
have like, the idea that the government's a
living embodiment of their s extituents. Well, clearly
not. Which, again, we should all know that
by now.
But these people decided this, and this should
be the choice of the people that live
there. Because this is going to immediately affect
their entire city.
And cause
over, inf,
stress on the systems. And this is not
about race or hatred. It's just the obvious
reality. Now you could argue that we should
wanna help them anyway, but that's not your
choice for everybody.
That's crazy to me. Just on its face,
that's unreal.
And I'm convinced that that's not some democrat
plot. That's a larger agenda of your government
and foreign policy of Israel and overlap to
cause what we're dealing with. But decide for
yourself. That's my opinion.
The immigrants are there, it writes, legally. Now
there's a whole dispute there. Because let's be
clear, technically,
well, this is a point about whether you
think the law is just it's it's kinda
the same point as me saying just because
it's legal doesn't make it constitutional or or
even because it's the law doesn't even make
it legal.
Those are all valid statements. So my point
is just because Kamala Harris or whoever's in
power decides to wave a wand and say
you now have status,
you could make the same argument that that's
not, I mean, technically speaking, they would now
be legal because the authority said they were
or gave them that status. I mean, it's
the same as Trump pardoning anybody or Biden
pardoning a criminal because they just same thing.
Right?
So my point is just because you don't
agree with that case doesn't mean it's not
technically, actually legal. But I also agree that
I mean, it's just arbitrary. Right? It's just,
like, you just they're all I mean, with
the stroke of a pen or just awaiting
of your wand, just claim there is no
such thing anymore. I mean, it's it's old
nonsense.
But the point still stands that based on
the way we see things, technically speaking, Trump
or Biden can say that and that would
be or rather do a process and that
would be the case. So what they're saying
is because of that, they're legal.
But that doesn't change the ultimate point they're
making. The the illegal aspect is only being
brought into play because it's a political point
for Trump, in my opinion anyway.
Because it's really just about the idea that
they're apparently migrants
are killing animals. That's the real focus if
I'm unless I'm missing it. But, you know,
the recognize the migration part of it, I
think is a whole aspect.
But it says the immigrants are there legally
and eligible to apply for temporary protected status.
Now that doesn't mean they're citizens, but that's
the point is they're being allowed to be
there by the government.
According to an immigration,
FAQ page on the site's website, city's website,
which says the total immigration population in Clark
County is estimated to be 12 to 15000.
That's wild. But their arrival has put a
strain, obviously, on medical systems on everything. Egg
education, I mean, that's no that's no question.
You could've brought in 15,000
people from the other town over, and it
would've caused some of these problems. But it
says in August, a city commission meeting
held to address
the influx of Haitian immigrants seemed to offer
one of the first suggestions that the migrants
were setting up were setting upon the local
wildlife.
One aggravated man made the claim during a
city commission meeting
last
month to address the influx of legal, they
say, Haitian immigrants, which has revitalized the local
economy again, they claim, which again does seem
to be somewhat the case, but that's not
just the only it's not just the only
aspect that matters. But also spark controversy among
locals. One of the points you'll make is
that just because, let's say, house prices went
up, doesn't mean that the people that must
live in apartments. That that that, you know,
it's not not this is it's like saying
the stock market's got up, like, so we're
all benefiting. That's not even remotely the case.
But the elitists love to, like Trump, love
to point at that and say, look, you
know, watch it up.
99.9%
of the country doesn't care. Same thing here
is because they're going, look, the economy's increased.
Well, a lot of people are suffering predominantly
because of the influx of people and the
the services they need has nothing to do
with whether the economy's doing better for their
immediate needs.
Now, again, we'll go through this. That's a
woman from Ohio that they claim was a
a Haitian immigrant, a lie that one of
the ones that actually started a lot of
this. That's the guy that really started this,
saying he saw it, but would never be
able to prove that, other than images that
we pulled to that been shown,
most of which have later been shown to
not even be the case. Now this is
my point. Like, that's right there. It should
be pretty hard to be okay with.
But it says the unsubstantiated story, when paired
with the image of the unidentified man, spread
like wildfire across Twitter, garnering millions upon millions
of views.
They put out this image of the guy
paired with the image of,
what what the bottom line is just the
story and the story and the image went
around
at this point, be just because he says
this in front of the council does not
therefore make it true because you want it
to be, or because you like the idea
and it supports your idea of the narrative,
even if it ends up being true later,
Right then, it started spreading like crazy.
And that's that's the side of our times,
the memeification of everything. And it says the
VP,
the,
Vance
basically said it publicly as well right before
the debate, but then actually walked it back
a little bit and said it's possible, of
course, that all these rumors will turn out
to be false. So explain that for me.
So he's willing to admit right before the
debate that we haven't verified this. It could
be false. But yet Trump gets up on
stage and states it as fact, and from
there forward, it's too late. Now we've committed
the party to it, so you get all
the rabid followers that will the the net
defend it at forever, like Bloomberg.
That's what she's doing. It says among them
was 10 Texas senator Cruz who posted a
photo of kittens with a caption that said,
vote for Trump so Haitian immigrants don't eat
us.
I mean, it's just so disgusting. These people
will take advantage of anything.
I mean, and the bottom line is you
don't think there there there are actual Haitian
immigrants in some cases
that are actual voters, not illegal, but people
that have been here and they're even immigrants,
their second their families have been there. But
so he doesn't care, apparently. So the point
is these people are gross. Left or right,
anybody that would dehumanize an entire population, like,
for genocide, for example, are gross or bad
people. My point though is that they don't
care.
It's all manipulation. That's why we've seen all
these dumb images of kittens and all these
different things. Why? I'm I'm willing to bet
you some of this might have been, let's
this because we can turn it into we
care about animals and she doesn't. You know
why I think that's actually a viable thing
to consider? Because they know from politics, look
this up, that animals
are an easy way to manipulate you. Because
we do. I'm I'm one of them. I
mean, I I almost I get more shocked
and affected sometimes by images of animal suffering
than I do of people.
The bottom line is I think that might
be what happened here in one way.
But going forward, it says reports of people
eating pets and other animals, including ducks and
geese, remained unconfirmed. This is as of 11th.
With no evidence that Haitian immigrants or anyone
else have carried out such attacks in Ohio.
In response, it says, quote, in response to
recent rumors alleging criminal activity by the immigrant
population in our city, we wish to clarify
that there has been no credible reports of
specific claims of pets being harmed, injured, or
abused by individuals within the immigrant community. And
this is the same city of Springfield,
the city of Springfield said this. That's I
think it's one of the things the NBC
read. Then the Springfield police spokesman on Tuesday
added in in re in response to recent
rumors, basically the same thing. We wish to
clarify that there'd been no credible reports of
any of this happening. Okay. They could all
be lying to cover up for what they're
doing dealing with, but that's not I it
doesn't seem like something they would even care
to cover up. Wouldn't that be in their
interest as the police to say, yes, it's
happening? I mean, it's also easy to go
there lying for but then also don't forget
remember that DeWine their governor the republican leader
openly recently said it was also unconfirmed. That
there was no evidence of this and it
hadn't happened. Now going
forward well, take a little bit step back,
actually. Just Casey Wright was the one that
posted this, showing both these clips. Now this
guy, to break it down quickly, was in
front of the city commission and simply said,
he saw them taking ducks.
Now, he seemed to say that he saw
the the if you listen to it, he
says that they ate that they ate them,
but his point is he saw them walking
away with ducks.
So how exactly did you know that they
ate them? Like, it seemed it was quite
obviously an assumption.
That's my my opinion. But you've listened to
it yourself. There's no if you if you
saw them take the ducks and they're walking
away. Either you're arguing that they sat down
and ate a raw duck in the middle
of the nobody seems to be claiming that
other than in unsubstantiated
nonsense on Twitter,
or that they you made the assumption that
they took them to eat them. It's a
it's a fair assumption as we'll get into
some points here in a second, but we
didn't know. And then this one was the
the the, video
of the woman.
And the only evidence you get from this
is the guy in the background going, you
did you eat it?
And here she is.
And that one is the one that Kevin
Sorbo shared. And right after the debate with
Trump going, oh, yeah. No evidence. Well, it
would actually be an evidence point,
but an incorrect one.
Because she's from Ohio, as everybody has now
confirmed. That's her right here.
She was charged with cruelty to to a
companion animal amid reports that she killed a
cat by stomping on its head before eating
it. Now that's a report.
Based on my research, there's nothing that actually
backs that up other than the guy saying
that in the video and then a couple
people behind them saying, yeah. Yeah. She ate
it. Which maybe maybe it was. I don't
know. But the bottom line is she's actually
a resident of Ohio.
And who knows what actually happened? And the
bottom line is she killed the cat. She's
from Ohio. But yet, somehow it got worked
in the story anyway because, you know, wool
animal. And she's she's not white. So, like,
she's just so lazy, cobbling together. So this
was how it all began.
And there are other examples of people which
we'll get into going forward saying, I see
them doing this. At what point do we
like, every time these things start,
you get people without fail these days that
step up and lie for it. Whether because
they're Republican and they wanna push the agenda
that will help Trump or whether they like
seeing people argue or they just wanna be
you know, cause chaos.
We all know that's happening, but it's weird
how the parties love to ignore it when
it works for their side. So I'm not
saying we know that's all that's happened. My
point is once this goes a couple of
days forward, especially when it becomes this crazy
viral,
we must know that's going to happen. I
mean, from the top of the political game,
they know they can abuse this now.
Now here's where it got a little more
interesting. This goes back a day before. This
is actually the day
this is like right after the debate. The
debate was on 10th.
So
a, aim angel what is how do you
pronounce that? AgNewsLive,
who is,
has a 177,000 followers.
Savage illegals kill a bald eagle that they
plan to eat for dinner,
and Kamal didn't give a damn. Now it
does say in 2023 right there, my my
point is this is spreading. So good on
her for actually pointing that out.
But spreading
without any indication that this is happening last
year.
It says, 2 illegal Honduras migrants. So I
found that really fascinating that all of a
sudden we get a rehash story about migrants
that even back then is pretty questionable about
what they claim is actually happening. Daily Mail
is the one saying that based on narratives
around other people claiming that. Well, go through
it. It doesn't seem to be actually backed
up that they the bottom line is we
know they killed this eagle. They were illegal
immigrants and they were deported.
So what else other than that, that's all
that that was verified.
My point is this is now circulating through
this conversation. And, look, this guy's got
31,000
followers
saying the myth the illegals are killing the
animals has been debunked.
So people see this, they think it's new,
and they they pretend this is all here
we see, they're killing them everywhere. Honduras, they're
oh, they're coming from everywhere, and they're killing
our animals.
Well, guys, the story is in fact from
2023, from March 2023.
And if you read the story, 2 illegal
Honduran migrants are arrested after shooting down a
bald eagle. They claim that they plan to
cook and eat.
But, again, what we actually know is that
they shot it and killed it. But even
if, let's just say, they wanted to kill
and eat the eagle. Like, let's be let's
stand back for a second and ask ourselves,
is this about some kind of a, you
know, gross third world? I mean, there's multiple
things to consider.
I, first of all, which I hope is
clear by now, am absolutely in no way
okay with people randomly killing animals.
I mean, quite frankly, any of them. I
I I'm very against the idea of people,
you know, especially cats and dogs, but frankly,
anything. It's it's supposed to realize that in
this country or other countries, it's different.
We tend to see cats and dogs, which
I agree with, as being more human related
because they do have more emotion in the
way they respond.
But they're in India, for example, cows are
sacred. Right? So they would frankly disagree that
they're more important than a cow, and we
kill cows all the time. So it's just
really silly for us to pretend that our
values are the same as everywhere else. That
is the way they like you thinking in
the closed minded paradigm.
They're all gross and bad and they have
to act like us, so they're uncivilized.
Well, maybe they just have a different view
of the world. And I'm not talking about
eating animals. I'm talking about the way they
live elsewhere in Iran, let's say, or Syria.
We act like they're a bunch of cave
dwelling maniacs.
No. You're just a dumb, ignorant person who
per gobbles up the narratives from people that
love to control you and laugh how much
you listen to them. My point, though, back
to this,
is if this person shot an eagle down,
it doesn't have to mean that it's from
some secret dangerous ritual, which is what they're
all pushing today. Maybe the guy was just
desperately hungry. Maybe he hates this country, wanted
to kill an eagle. Maybe he shot it
down to eat it. I mean, the bottom
line is, it's not the story that we're
being jammed down down our throats today. Now,
again, the main point is that this is
from 2023,
but it's being presented all over the place
as being from today other than Angel to
Angel News here.
So that was 20,
September 10th.
Now my point about the Honduras thing, I
just wanna include really quickly.
So Haiti right now is pretty clear that
they're shifting power for the interest of their
power structure, as Dan points out. And what
a coincidence we get this massive weird out
of nowhere push about Haitian immigrants
eating animals.
At the same time, when we just heard
the Honduras leadership on September 5th publicly saying
the US government is about to coup us
again.
They're they're marshaling their forces right now. At
the same time, I was talking about the
Peter Thiel company who has created a fake
libertarian utopia, which I explained in the beginning,
that is literally taking a, apparently, up to
44% of Honduras.
Because they made a contract with an illegal
coup government that allowed them to do it
by removing people from their judge positions
that and putting ones in place that would
vote the way they wanted them to. Got
a contract to create a special development zone,
which by the way is right out of
20 30 agenda.
And now they're using that to grow and
take control of areas. They have their own
police force, their own taxes, their own laws.
What is that if not occupation?
And now they've they've changed the law legally
speaking from the government they have and
Prospera, which is the location we're talking about,
and Peter Thiel's company don't care.
Why do you think they don't care? Because
I think they expect a regime change where
it won't matter anymore. Either way,
this is a technocratic takeover. It's what it
is.
So all that being said, I find it
very interesting at the same time they suddenly
start pointing at an old Honduras migrant discussion
just like they're using with Haiti. Just something
to think about. I'll include the link to
the, Brock's breakdown of this over, this conversation.
Which I think is important by the way.
Oh, I tweeted earlier.
So,
back to the story. So now we're at
September 12th.
So here's what this guy is saying proves
the story.
Proves.
I mean, you cannot make this up. This
is coming Oh, you can. You can make
up at all. From the attorney general of
Ohio.
Dave Yost, to be specific.
He says, and I quote,
in addition to straining available resources,
locals have complained
of migrants causing car crashes,
stealing property, including livestock,
squatting in homes, and killing wildlife
for food.
Okay. So in case you missed it, he
said people have complained.
So now so it's a secondary it's a
claim from somebody else being reported by somebody
else and then being reported by the governor.
Or rather specifically being second that they claimed
it.
So whoever's categorized you know, taking that information,
collecting that information, the governor then claims that
this is somebody something claim. How was that
proof of anything?
It's another data point. And for all we
know, by the way, it's the same 3
people we've already seen.
That's because that's what always happens. So, again,
I'm not I'm just pointing out the obvious.
It could be real or it could be
more of of people claiming what they've already
heard. And the more this becomes a viral
phenomenon, the more this is gonna be pointed
to or lied about or misunderstood.
We know
that. And he also says, and I quote,
Ohio is a great place to work and
live, but overwhelming our small towns with massive
migrant populations without any coordination or assistance from
the federal government is changing that in front
of our eyes. Yeah. That's obvious. But that
that's not the point. It's not about whether
the mass immigration program was ridiculous.
I mean, there's a point there's a point
about that, obviously, but the conversation
is about how is focused on the misrepresentation
around the eating of animals
and what that means to the Haitian community
in order
to change people's opinions
around that point.
The but bottom line is everyone keeps pointing
at statements from officials
going, this is what has been said as
proving the story. That was the first thing
that circled around after Trump.
Yeah. I know it. Well, clearly, that's not
proving anything. And on top of that, I
thought we were just talking about how we're
dumb for listening to an official it's funny
how it works both ways. Right? Now it's
something you do wanna hear, so what they
said is true.
But over here, we can't trust what they'll
tell us. You know, it's it's just always
subjective and, you know, the hypocrisy.
Here oh, and then the comment below,
this guy says, again, the attorney general of
Ohio confirms the claims. No. He didn't confirm
the claims. He said people said that. That's
when that the claim is that people have
expressed this, not that the claims themselves have
been proven true. Even if they do get
proven true,
assuming that now would still be wrong. Now
he says that and this person just makes
a point. The caravans are coming. I I
made the same point. Remember that? All the
hype about the caravan in Venezuela. And I
remember that one is as soon as the
election was over, no more caravan talk.
Even though they accept the immigrants were coming
through and okay. So why didn't they hype
on it anymore?
Neither side, by the way. He says this
time, it's some other black people. I mean,
it's you could you could call him a
Democrat, whatever. The point is real. Both sides
do it. The idea is it's an election
season, and so they make up something to
hype.
This person says, let's just keep moving the
goal post. 1st, it was eating pets,
but that was proven false. Well, you can
just agree decide for yourself on that case.
Now you change it to wildlife.
The cope is hilarious. According to the AG,
they are eating wildlife, not pets. Well, it's
just a good point to make. Right? Because
couldn't that just mean deer? Yeah. It
could. So they are catching wild animals, AKA
hunting. Now, again, that could just mean him
saying that to water down the fact that
they're killing cats, but the point is we
don't know. It's the only point I'm making.
Face it. He goes, Trump looked like a
racist idiot in front of the world when
saying Haitian immigrants are eating cats. Even the
TikTok he posted proved they are not eating
pets.
Hey, America. This is what I mean when
I say MAG has a mental illness. Well,
I frankly think the 2 party illusion to
mental illness, and you're both doing it. But
the point, nonetheless, is that they all choose
to ignore what they want and listen to
what they want. Now here's another story. This
goes to September 14th.
Feds
city to crack down on animal sacrifices in
New York City's Jamaica Bay after dog carcass
with snap neck wounded pigs found.
Yeah. It's pretty shocking title. Right? Let's not
forget, the New York Post just put out
a completely false statement about the river to
the sea point. Right? So they're very partisan
and subjective just like all the rest of
our corporate media.
Here's what it says. Nonetheless,
consider with open mind.
City and federal parks authorities
Should there be an apostrophe there? Anyway, s
City and Federal Parks No. Okay. Authorities are
beefing up resources near Jamaica Bay in Queens.
So we're talking about New York, obviously. Following
the post expose last week of surging animal
sacrifices in the area. Then what we're gonna
go into next is the idea that this
is not a new thing at all. It
goes back a very long way.
And now that's different than saying it's not
happening. My point is though the idea of
this in a general sense is not some
new discussion.
And and that again, that's why my point
has not been that it's not real, but
more so that we have yet to verify
basically any of this. And so it's possible
on top of all the other things we've
talked about, this is a classic thing that's
always been there that they decide to sort
of hype.
And that's why it's a lot of flimsy
narratives we can't that are all fake and
prove because they're just using something that kind
of is there and then making a fake
story around it to push some kind of
a narrative. But either way,
it says the nation's park service promised to
install a pair of mobile lights
by the certain bridge in the federally managed
Spring Creek Park to ward off people torturing
and killing animals under the cover of darkness.
Again, all of the framing and the words
that are used come specifically from a republican
councilwoman
Joanne Arriola or Ariola. Yeah. That's right. That's
a weird last name. The point is that
the idea of torturing and killing and sacrifice,
well, I mean, that's certainly one of the
possibilities, especially since these areas have kind of
a history of ritualistic
actions
around some kind of religious practices. I'll show
you this in a second.
Which, again, whether you agree with it or
not is up for you, but the point
is that that is a choice to frame
it a certain way.
Now it says, Animals Rescuers said at least
8 animals were found dead or maimed.
So that's the story coming from Animal Rescuers.
Now, course, that could obviously be other things.
Right? It could be animals killing these animals.
It could be somebody doing it to make
it look a certain way, or it could
be animal sacrifice.
But the Republican congresswoman chose to frame it
a certain way, so consider that. It says
those these have included 5 wounded pigs, a
near dead baby rat stuffed in a bag
with chicken bones. Now that obviously has a
different feel to it. And a dog carcass
with its neck snapped.
But, again,
in this case, especially with the kind of
momentum we have going on, we should ask
ourselves whether a dead rat with chicken bones
might be a little bit too on the
nose. But that's up for you to decide.
Maybe that's done to make the case or
maybe there is a act. I mean, again,
you'll wait just fall through. We're gonna get
to in a second about the reality of
some of these things. Now it says, quote,
I've gotten in touch with my partners at
both the federal and city level and we
are going to bring a new level of
enforcement to the area and really crack down
on this sickening behavior.
Right? So all you ultimately know at this
point is there's dead animals. She's choosing to
frame it this way and crack down on
these bad things because it's very politically advantageous,
I argue. Animals should not be getting tortured
and mutilated.
That, again, the rescuers did not seem to
incise claim that they were mutil I just
didn't I feel that's a little bit heavy,
but you can decide for yourself.
Here's what we get from Elon Musk around
this post.
Again, I mean, you could look at the,
you know, a random little bone. I mean,
these things don't seem to suggest what the
if we had images of tortured, mutilated, you'd
get something to that effect. It'd be all
over the place, as usual.
That's my opinion. But this AI pictures of
cute little animals, that's my point about the
politics side.
You damn well know that affects people. People
that even know they're doing it.
And it's working to a degree. The idea
that Kamala Harris hates kittens and dogs, and
when he's the one saving them. And it's
a fairly lazy argument. It's it's has effect.
That's how politics works.
Boil down to the smallest thing. Use the
lowest common denominator. Now what I wanna point
out is in particular,
the killings of the Spring Creek area
weirdly started happening right on September 11th,
the day after the debate. So we're to
believe that this is something that they just
now realize these migrants have been there for
a while
And apparently only started doing it in the
one location you're hyping on this article the
day after Trump makes the claim?
That of all things is pretty hard to
wrap your mind around.
Or to be objective, as always, you could
argue that they only started
researching it or
deciding to report on it. So but the
same point would be, so clearly we don't
care about it unless it's politically advantageous? I
mean, you could take it whatever you want.
That is interesting as hell to me. Now
down here it says, while the exact motivations
behind these killings are unclear, which again, I
think is very irrelevant,
authorities suspect
that they may be linked to a sect
of devotees who have been practicing animal sacrifices
in the Jamaican Bay Area for several years.
So, okay, so this goes well back before
this current conversation.
But that doesn't then prove that's what this
is.
You see my point? That's just being objective.
And if that bothers you, then go back
to people telling you how to think. The
community has long considered Jamaica Bay a spiritual
site.
Interesting. And some believe that their recent animal
sacrifices are tied to religious practices. But if
that's the case, then why wouldn't this been,
in this location, more prominent? I mean, it's
worth considering.
But what's overall interesting to this is that
it says it's worth noting that similar incidents
have occurred in the past.
2014, which I'll show you next, several animals
were found in a place called Rock Creek
Park, which I don't think is too far
away.
Since July 2024,
at least 8 animals have been found either
dead or severely injured in the vicinity.
But that could be any number of things.
My what I find interesting is the idea
of the they that there people consider this
a spiritual site.
Again, in the debate on September 10th. Just
wanna make sure we saw that. The timing
of it all.
Now the spiritual side part, I find interesting.
And the idea that all we really know
is that this has happened there, it seems,
at least by reports in the local. And
again, if you're if you're gonna deny their
current reports about how it's not happening because
they could be lying, I don't know why
you would bluntly take the reports about how
it is happening. You see my point? It's
also so subjective about what you wanna listen
to.
That's why objectivity bothers people like this so
much, but here's the claims report from 2014.
Ritualistic killing suspected in animal deaths at Rock
Creek. Suspected, which is apparently the way it
ended up. There's there's no I think there's
no ultimately, you have dead animals,
but there is a history here and so
they think that's likely. But that's not proving
anything, but it says and to be very
clear, as far as I could tell, this
is something that has happened in some of
these locations.
Whether they're and and that doesn't mean Haitian
immigrants. It just means there are people in
oh, re this is interesting what it says
over here. Some religions, including from the West
African and Caribbean religion,
Santeria,
practice animal sacrifice.
You know who else practices animal sacrifice?
Israel.
Then it goes on to say, and the
US Supreme Court in 1993
2,009
has ruled to protect animal sacrifice as a
religious practice. Maybe that's why. Either way, the
point is if we're gonna freak out about
the idea, which I I will absolutely
say I care about, whether it's
Israel
or Haitian immigrants that kill sacrificing animals I
disagree with, whether religious or not. It's I
it's it's no in my mind, it's a
it's a living creature.
I mean, it's the same reason I have
such a hard time with the idea of
anything, like manufacturing. I mean, if you ever
seen, like, a slaughter a slaughterhouse, it'll stay
with you forever. I've been there more than
once because I used to be in, you
know, I still am a chef but used
to be running kitchens. And I thought it
was important at the time to understand it.
My point is that it is horrifying.
You'll never wanna talk to that stuff again
when you see how even with the current
technological level, it's horrifying. It's so it's import
it is literally a horror show.
My point is that's why I am you
know, I'm not necessarily a vegan.
I eat meat all the time. My point
is that I try to prac
use this and, like, realistically feel like I
could act all the way out in what
I want. I would only actually
kill my own animals and utilize every piece
of it the way, like, a a native
American practice would be. I mean, I have
Menominee in my background and for regardless. But
the point is simply that I believe that
that is the way it makes
sense. That you're using this for your nourishment
and you say and it's like a sacred
process.
That's just my I just wanna include my
own personal belief. My point is simply that
when it comes to this idea that you
wanna kill them for whatever else, I mean,
you know, the pie the idea that I
think that this is a problem of my
personal belief, but the idea that it's a
religious aspect of it,
well, it's something that'd be discussed. And here,
what's even more interesting is we have the
idea that the supreme court has ruled more
than once that this is protected. Now to
be clear,
as it says, animal cruelty laws require that
the animals be killed humanely,
a vice president with the Washington Humane Society
told the Washington Post. And in no way
am I even saying I agree with that.
I just find it fascinating that we have
2 different precedents from the Supreme Court that
argue that doing so in a humane way
is legal and that they think this location
is actually a a spiritual site.
So suddenly that kinda changes the conversation a
bit, doesn't it? Even if we disagree with
which I do, The argument being that there's
a legal aspect to this. And so at
what point do we cross that line? Why
is that not being discussed? I can tell
you why. Because this is not about facts
and understanding the situation. It is about political
screaming and getting you to drive in a
certain direction. That's all it's about.
So this one says Brooklyn Ceremony,
Cemeteries
Dark History. This is just,
you know, the the search on on Brave.
According to historical records, Brooklyn cemeteries have been
plagued by instances of animal sacrifices
and grave desecration with evidence dating back to
the early seventies. Okay. So the other point
is simply to go,
clearly, this has not been a new thing.
So why suddenly is it being fixated on?
I've already made that clear, I think.
And on top of that, the point is
that what they're pointing to to make the
claim today, despite there being history, is clearly
up in the air, which I'll show you
next.
And that makes it even more concerning that
there's something more moo manipulative going on. Manipulative
going on. Now here's another story from the
12th.
It's disgusting, it says. Again, that's one person's
claim of what they see, not that they
saw it happen. Three cats found, mutilated.
Now this is on 12th.
So now we're 3 days away. I'm the
point is you wonder, look, if we're I
mean, just to be objective, it is not
outside the realm possibility that somebody would do
this for this purpose.
Especially somebody from a, you know, more of
a larger manipulation
overlapping with larger agendas. But either way, the
bottom line
is that all we have
are cats that were killed,
which, by the way, could be done by
a wild animal,
and the point being right here.
Animal cruelty detectives are investigating,
saying
there's not enough evidence to know if for
certain if it was done by an animal
or a person. So So right there, it
shows you that if they can't discern whether
it was an animal or a person, this
was not some cut the head off sacrifice.
Because if it they if it can't tell,
that means it was so ripped apart that
it could've been an animal destroying it, which
would be very common.
But that's not to say it didn't happen.
And that's what frustrates people in the paradigm.
That's where we leave it. You put it
down because we can't verify it one way
or the other.
Now, here's a video coming off of Lumer's
ridiculous post,
saying they're taking the cats.
And now, look, there's some people that have
followed up on this, claiming that they can
prove this is some kind of a control
discussion where they're picking up a dead cat
for animal control. The guy is wearing an
all blue jumpsuit. I mean, come on, guys.
I don't know. But the point is, it's
a cat they're putting in a bag. I
don't the point you don't know either. At
the end of the day, for all we
know, this is from a different location, which
a lot of them have ended up being.
And if it it's just it's so frustrating
to me that these things are being used.
And, yes, these are flying around the Internet.
And this one, it turns out, is something
real, but it goes back to an old
story from 2020. That's what Eva is pointing
out. Sync reports about Haitians stealing and people's
cats. You know, a lot of them from
you could argue, in some cases, from a
genuine place
are are doing things that I argue are
completely obtuse and completely, you know, broad stroking.
The idea that immigrants are bad because they
are not like us is a disgusting opinion
regardless of whether you think it's true in
regard to rationalizing actions against them. Now you
can argue that's because it's your prerogative that
you don't think they should be able to
come in your city because you think it'll
change the dynamic, and that's completely up to
you. But the claim of arguing all of
them are one way,
that's my point. That's ignorance no matter what
your opinion is. Because it's not true.
It's like it's like saying everybody in what
in in the United States is all one
opinion. We know that's not true. Or we
all are fat and lazy and like to
do, you know, whatever the claim Americans are.
It's not the truth.
So the same thing to point out about
them. And the the problem with a lot
of the western conversation is it's it's almost
willful ignorance about the fact that our cultures
around the world are shockingly different.
And in some cases, there's things that overlap
that are hard to wrap your mind around.
Say you know how many things that happen
in this country that people are disgusted by?
In some cases, me too.
But she points out this person eating, in
in back in 2020, which she does claim,
eating, killing an animal on the street and
cooking it.
And the guy simply goes, I don't have
any money. The story's right here.
Sickening moment man casually barbecues dead cat in
the street. Now it it discusses it all
in here. The guy goes, you know, I
don't have any money. Then the woman goes,
but you have cigarettes.
Which is a fair point. That's basically the
gist of the story. But my point is
simply that, you know, this is
not indicative. Her point is this has been
going on around the world and you're only
just now seeing it. And to me, it's
it's one one example from a while ago.
It's not some overwhelming thing. You know, it
just it feels wrong to me that this
is being hype hype imposed over us when
there's so many more things. And the bottom
line is this guy is eating a cat
because he didn't have any money. I'm I'm
a 100% don't agree with that, and I
would call him out for it too. But
the bottom line is if you live in
a different country, in some countries that do
eat cats on a regular basis, which I
disagree with, the point is that it's just
it's it's the lack of trying to understand
where somebody might be coming from, even if
you wanna say it's a crime, which I
agree. In my opinion, that should be something
you should be stopped from doing.
But the idea to turn this into some
kind of hatred against all immigrants, especially knowing
that this is being manufactured for you, not
this example, but in general, it's it's choosing
to be ignorant about it.
Same thing here.
This ridiculous video
of whatever you wanna say this is, which
by the way I mean, are we really
pretending this looks like something being grilled? Does
anybody has everybody ever cooked anywhere? This is
a clearly, the grill is not lit. K?
This is clearly something sitting on a cold
grill.
So either this guy made this and pretend
did this. I mean, there's nothing about this
lines up at all. Whether it's about the
cooking, whether it's about whether if you think
it's been cooked, it doesn't it's clearly, it's
not something that has been cooked.
I can promise you that.
So now we've got a a random raw
thing sitting like, Casey Wright argues those were
a couple of and he's right. If you
look at, like, a duck with his legs
in the air, that will or any number
of things. I don't know is the point.
Neither do you. But all we do know
is this guy claiming he's looking at a
video, which nobody knows, like, thinks this guy
put his name on it apparently.
Even though it's not his video, and it's
a video that he investigated, but all we
get is his second hand second hand claim
that he walked around and asked people and
they're the that's all you get though.
I don't know this
guy. And you shouldn't blindly take anyone's word
for anything. But he says, we spoke with
the author of the video, which I can't
verify. And we asked to remain anonymous. So
there you go. So we have an anonymous
video we can't verify.
And he says he told us, the guy
we can't prove or verify, that he was
picking up his son and he noticed the
situation where he said some Africans that stay
next door
had a cat in the grill.
Now I frankly find that kind of hard.
I just did something about that just feels
pretty off to me. But he goes on
to argue that he double checked this and
he spoke to the neighbors. My point is,
there that's just a bunch of it could
be. I'm not saying he's lying. Take it
up for yourself.
But as always, if we're in a position
where all you have is this guy writing
on Substack about something that clearly seems like
it doesn't add up to me,
I find it hard to believe.
He says, we have discovered that migrants are,
in fact, eating cats in Ohio. You see
how weird this all feels? And the bottom
line is again,
that grill is not lit, that is not
a cooked piece of meat,
and it just feels wrong about the way
it's watch.
There's just something weird about this. And they
got all the guys going, man, look at
that, there's something on the way, that's weird.
And then, oh, there's a cat right there,
must be a cat. I don't know, man.
I just don't it's it just feels stupid
to me. As as much as I've already
shown you that it very clearly could be
something going on,
I feel like we're being manipulated. And this
person says, thought it was a a Haitian
migrants eating cats. Now it's Africans?
Where are the where are the migrants in
the video?
Whose house is this? How do we know
these people are immigrants and with the and
not Americans?
He says, click the link, read the article,
which I did too. It doesn't I mean,
there's claims, but they doesn't approve anything. And
she goes, write the article, same questions.
People will believe what they want to believe.
Oh, but look at this. It really makes
you feel good when the grifter from Maui
comes in and lie and pushes the same
story. Even though what I can prove to
you is that the best he could have
done was take the word of Christopher Ruffo.
But that's the how that works.
These people are absolute grifters.
Nick Sorter says, illegal migrants caught skidding, grilling,
and eating cats.
Excuse me. Minutes from Springfield. Oh, it's not.
So it's not. But it says the video
was obtained by this guy who has verified
it. Okay. So
you have reported this as fact because this
guy says he checked it. That's not journalism,
guys. That's a status blind
partisan
assumption.
The mainstream media called it once again called
it lied once again. Of course, Trump was
right. Mass deportations now.
My god. How are people falling for these
people?
Remember, this guy, in case you forgot, was
caught red handed, Showing up in Maui, staying
at a 5 star hotel using the money
he grip asked for donations.
Swore, I have a I'll stay in a
tent. I'm gonna get there just to help
the people that are suffering. And then took
the money, stayed in a 5 star hotel,
and did flimsy research at best despite all
the push he got. He was confronted on
video while he was on video with Bannon.
And the guy walked up behind him. He
goes, Nick?
He goes, yeah. I knew. He said, you
you you you know, and called him out.
Nick, basically,
almost started to cry. I'm not making this
up. I covered it live on the show.
Bannon was like, stay with it. Stay with
it.
The guy called him out.
These people are not your friends.
The bottom line is this is a complete
this is it works for me, so I'm
gonna pretend that I verified this, and look
at this, 8,600,000
views.
It's just sad to me. It's just very
sad that this is happening in general.
And there's another story.
This guy
is in a car with a migrant.
Actually, let me check something really quickly.
I reached out to somebody about what the
potentially seeing what this guy was saying. I
wanna see if he responded.
Nope. Not yet, it looks like. Anyway,
so next order says Haitian migrants in Springfield
are filing false replete police reports.
Try tying up scarce resources.
I personally witnessed this yesterday when my Haitian
Lyft driver, who spoke zero English, stopped the
car and called 911 claiming he was being
surrounded and scared for his life.
In reality, he was ticked off because someone
took his picture.
I mean,
I don't I just don't I don't trust
And a guy Oh, by the way, East
Palestine, same thing. These people were grifting on
these stories when the reality was exactly what
a lot of us were reporting, not from
one republican manipulated narrative. The bottom line
is if you watch this video, you get
a guy calling,
struggling to speak with this guy because he
doesn't speak perfect English, and all you'd all
they do is I mean, look, How do
we know this is even remotely accurate? It
completely rests on
the clout
of Nick's
order. So for me, I'm com it's nothing.
It means nothing. It's a it's a video
where he claims everything, so there's no point.
But the at the end of the day,
he makes this whole claim about the guy
not being able to speak to the driver,
according to the officer he spoke with later,
multiple units were dispatched. So I we can't
prove any of this.
And if you listen to him speak, it
it
I'm like, I'm not I don't. I'm the
bottom line is it's unverifiable.
I could give you my personal opinions, but
the bottom line, I think it's important to
realize that I don't trust these people and
I think they're manipulating you.
For all we know,
all this was the just, like, this guy
speaks creole, and so we're gonna I mean,
why watch the video. Why is this guy
letting him film? There's something very off at
all this. Just please, show skepticism,
ask questions.
Now
here's where it gets interesting.
The dark neo Nazi origins of Trump's migrant
pet eating conspiracy
It's from the New
Republic. Now it says a neo nazi group
is taking credit, and this was posted on
the 13th. He's taking credit for creating and
spreading this racist conspiracy, they claim, or they
call it from about Haitian immigrants are killing
and eating pets.
Which again, to be clear, is not a
racist conspiracy theory when it's happened in the
past. But to be real, we don't know
if it's happening now. The bottom line is
that this is Neo Nazis claiming they're the
ones that started this.
Guess who it is? Your old friend, Christopher
Polhas from the blood tribe. Remember him? We've
talked about this a lot. The leader of
the blood tribe, it's kinda like a patriot
front variation.
The blood tribe leader, Christopher Polhas, celebrated on
his Telegram channel on Wednesday after the presidential
debate be between Trump and Kamala Harris the
day before
Trump brought the false rumor,
or rather it's the rumor.
So this guy,
as I've done very I I break this
down in this show right here,
Azov
full further infiltrates US, which was that Khrystva
Poloz and the blood tribe explicitly
are directly connected to the rise above movement,
which the rise above movement is the US
arm, according to the FBI and other even
corporate media reports in the past,
of the Azov movement.
The Azov Movement, the Neo Nazi elements in
the United State or in Ukraine that are
funded by the United States and Israel.
Rise Above Movement that was Charlottesville
were the US arm of the rise of
the Azov Movement.
He is a direct connection to the rise
above movement.
So my point is this is all connected.
This this is an operation. This is not
up for debate. The Azov Movement is a
complete fabrication by Israel and the United States
to manipulate the country of Ukraine in many
other ways, but also to manipulate Russia.
But it's being used all around the world
at this point. This is an obvious connection.
My point is that now he's claiming, and
it seems clear based on this article that
this was being pushed forward by them before
Trump said it, that they were the ones
that started this lie, and he's calling it
that
In order to get rid of Haitian immigrants,
they claim. So at the same time, you've
got Laura Loomer pushing this in Trump's ear,
who is directly tied back to Israel. Then
you've got somebody who is an extension of
the Israeli funding of Neo Nazis in Ukraine
pushing the lie. So you could argue that
might have been a coordinated way to get
this all to happen, but you can ask
yourself that as you go through it. While
the exact origin of the rue is unclear,
it says, it was at least amplified and
spread by Neo Nazi group, the blood tribe.
In late or possibly the FBI. In late
June, local Facebook groups in Ohio in late
June.
In Ohio, we're posting about Haitian children chasing
geese and ducks. What do you know?
In the next few weeks, darker rumors spread
about the ducks and geese going missing and
possibly being eaten by Haitian immigrants.
So to be clear, this is explicitly stated
by them as something they were making up.
How is it possible that in June, in
Ohio, they're making up rumors about exactly what's
going around now, and it just so happens
to pass oh, come on, guys.
In August, Blood Tribe picked up on the
rumors and started posting about them on Telegram.
Members of the racist organization marched in Springfield,
Ohio
in early August and spoke at some of
the town's meetings, and guess what they were
talking about?
Yeah. Exactly.
It says from there, the false story was
picked up. So now, same meeting. Same city
commission meeting.
So how, now we've got the images of
these people standing up and they get squares,
right here.
Look at that. How do we know that's
not part of the same thing?
Like, realize that there's very clear overlap to
this that's very hard to deny.
So, again, you've got the blood tribe openly
stating this, that we tricked them. Now it
says from there, the false story was picked
up by the right wing and wokeness account
on x.
You know, which as usual, just blindly sharing
the partisan narratives without due diligence. It says,
which last week posted a screenshot from a
Facebook post and a picture of a man
holding some kind of bird. That was this
story. That was this right here.
And where is it? And it says the
picture
wasn't from Springfield though. It was taken from
Columbus on July 28th And the photographer was
has apologized and admitted he doesn't know the
ethnicity of the man. Doesn't matter though. And
Wokeness pushed it as a a Haitian migrant
eating animals and we got the proof. Why?
Because they all do that.
Left and right, mind you. But it goes
still, a post on Reddit made the rumor
go viral. With right wing influencers
soon creating AI generated pictures of Trump protecting
pets,
specifically cats, politicians from Ted Cruz to JD
Vance picked up on it. Now the increased
detention is causing problems in the town, leading
to threats against town buildings and elementary schools.
Apparently, there's been bomb threats.
As well as a condemnation from the mayor.
If the family's deceased son has been used
as a political tool, much to their, outrage.
Now this is the point if apparently this
kid was indeed killed by a migrant illegally
there,
but he has himself has spoken up and
said, I I would actually, he says this
publicly. I I wish that my son was
killed by a white 60 year old man.
And he said because
he would he wouldn't be used by the
political sphere. He's talking about all sides using
it.
Talking about the people like Trump and his
cabinet using him to push the idea that
migrants are the point is that this is
an accident, he said. But, yes, it was
an illegal immigrant. But the point is people
get in accidents all the time whether they're
illegal or not. It's all used to drive
people out. It's it's a political game.
A family's deceased son has been used as
a political tool, much to their outrage. Republican
leaders
Now the the bottom line is simply the
idea what we're talking about here.
It's interesting to see how this is being
played and how this has drifted through the
conversation.
Now we talked about this before. We've talked
about this in regard to the larger point
about Ukraine and the new Al Qaeda, which
is the same thing of building that's the
Azov movement for a very long time. Now
I'm gonna skip this for time, but the
overall point of this article is the memeification
point.
Saying this this simple, the debate over Springfield
illustrates
the continuing memeification
of politics.
Now that well, before they pointed this out,
we've been talking about this. The turning of
politics into a collection of signals and symbols
that discussions and then rather than discussions of
content or policy.
We all see this. Buzzwords and manipulations,
it is everywhere.
Now we'll end with this. Seems that the
last part is
seemingly and well, I guess we'll just sense
we'll
rapidly state it since we're already well passed.
But the idea simply is, remember, the Guardian
was pointing out as a lot of the
republican insiders around Trump were saying get her
away from him, That she was the reason
he had that in his ear.
Now, Bill Maher has apparently made a whole
thing about how Loomer is sleeping with Trump
and and she freaked out about it. And
she simply says, I should sue Bill Maher
for defamation, which, by the way, I also
laughed about.
Her entire grift is about defaming everybody all
the time. Anybody that goes afoul of anything
is a racist, a slut, or what. It's
crazy.
Her own supporters are like the point is
that this guy says, sucks when the shoe
is on the other foot, and you're the
one getting slandered and attacked. Laura?
I mean, she's right. I mean, it's what
she does. Accuses people of things that are
completely unverified all the time.
But this she says, I don't think that
I'm I don't I don't think that I'm
not taking note of which conservatives are sitting
back and doing nothing. And so now you're
threatening people that are on your side because
they don't stand up and say, maybe because
they think you
you get the point. I mean, look, I
have a very low opinion of this person,
but I'm trying to temper my you know,
it's kind of a happy accident that's overlaps
with the story, quite frankly. But the bottom
line
is that ultimately she's going after anybody saying
you're, you know, you're not standing up and
for Trump's biggest support or Trump's most important
allies, as usual, calling herself the most important
ally.
But this person says, Laura Loomer has secured
my support for the position of press secretary.
Oh my god. That scared the hell out
of me.
Think about that. Well, actually, kind of be
a positive too. Right? Because just like KJP,
she would drown in that position. Frankly, I
would be really shocked if anybody actually considered
that. But I think it'd be hilarious to
see. Either way, it's also kinda terrifying seeing
as how we're getting Musk and all this
this weird overlap of Trump's cap Gabbard. I
mean, it's just just turning into be some
kind of a clown show. But either way,
I really hope not.
I Okay. Since we're get We'll just finna
I'll just think this is funny. So I
don't know if this is true or not.
This guy
Where is it?
What? I know I grabbed that.
Well, this is it's right here. This is
true. Hold on. Let me just grab this
guy. Then he posted this anyway. There it
is.
There it is. So this is actually crazy
to me. So this guy has got a
1000000 followers.
He's claiming
and this goes over to the 10nd point
about people like this willing to sell out
for anything.
He says he set up a fake dog
food company last month.
Bought Purina
at the store.
Paid Laura Loomer a $100
to do this.
Of course he could've making that up.
But here's the actual post where she says
this.
I ate I just ate dog food. It's
human gray, which means you and your dog
can share a tasty nutrient dense treat.
Okay. If he did, that's crazy if he
actually did this. I find that crazy.
But, this lord Bebo even said it's a
$100 oh, it's a 100 only to get
lord eat dog food. I simply said imagine
what you get for $200.
Support independent real media objective nonpartisan media. Yes.
It does exist. It's just not being pushed
on by on you by platforms like this.
But so she literally makes this whole thing
about,
ever you know, just put put it's called
positive.
Multiple posts about this. Just ate dog food.
Here's what I find interesting.
If you click on the actual link, it
takes you to this weird page
not working correctly.
And but other variations of it seem to
work, like the point that she seems to
be using, bison topper. It's a topper of
human grade.
Okay. So it seems like it might be
a real website, but then what I found
interesting is that you call the number and
it goes to a like a cell phone
answering machine. There's no information on
it. Here's the account
on Twitter. It's got a 131 followers.
I think she might have actually gotten tricked
at eating Purina on her show. I think
that's just crazy. But the overarching point is
that these people will take money from anybody
and support anything
because that's what they are. And I'm making
that as a broad point because we've seen
that with Tenet and with any other that
it's just crazy how obvious this is.
But if that happened, I find that to
be absolutely incredible. It looks like even,
Russell Brand was saw talking about this. It
it very well could be a a real
because right there, it's positive thing, but I
find it really hard to believe that the
website's acting wonky like that. The the phone
number goes to a regular not phone, and
that they have that small of a following.
I just and look, they just joined in
April. I don't know.
And if I've it's crazy that this guy
is saying this. I just thought that was
a funny overlap. The all overarching point is
simply that this is something we should be
very aware of. That people like this
are willing
to do just about anything, like the Tim
Pool's of the world out there that are
showing you that they're willing to do this.
The tenant money was an important conversation. Now,
whether that's the Russia overlap or just RT
deciding I mean, who knows? The fact the
story is that they
didn't care to look into the background there.
Maybe just like this story.
Now I'm gonna end with this again because
I do want to end on a positive
feeling despite all the nonsense and everything. Oh,
actually, I forgot I wanted the this video
first. So the this I'm glad I didn't
forget that. So all after everything else we
just saw, I feel again, it probably just
leaves you in a position where it seems
like we don't know. And again, that might
be where we are. And so we put
it aside. We don't scream about narratives that
we don't fully understand. The reality is there
is an interesting background here,
And there's an interesting weird religious overlap to
the whole thing. It's it's a crazy story,
but at the end of the day, the
fact that we've gotten about 7 different complete,
provable lies on top of this, just like
the Trump conversation with the shooting. I mean,
there's so many things like this where it
happens. We need to recognize that we will
be, even if it is a true story,
we're still being played. We're still being used.
And on top of all that, it doesn't
seem to be adding up for me. But
you can decide for yourself.
And if it ends up turning out to
be verifiably happening, I'm my point would be,
yeah. It doesn't surprise me because there's a
history there. So there's already somebody reaching out
going, are you gonna retract what you said?
And I'm like, so pair so were you
not listening or are you just here to
to manipulate? Because I've said from the beginning
that there's just not the no proof,
but it very well could've you've heard me
a 1000 times. But there's always these people
out there trying to manipulate
others into believing we're saying something we're not.
That's the partisanship that is desperate, that is
vulnerable
to people that are offering something different.
So this is a clip of a guy
telling you what he feels is going on
in Ohio, Springfield.
A little different.
Yo.
We out here. Springfield, Ohio.
Let's just spill all this bullshit, all these
rumors, all these lies that you guys are
hearing. None of the Haitians is doing none
of this bullshit.
They can't drive.
We we we we will admit to that.
But
none of the bullshit y'all hear. Don't believe
what you hear in the media. Don't believe
what you hear in Trump say
the news say
no patients are stealing people's animals.
Cats, dogs, geese, ducks,
none of that. Eat them.
That's bullshit. So don't believe it. I'm right
here. And Now, of course, he could just
not be seeing it. He could be lying
just like the reverse.
So that has to apply equally to every
side of the conversation.
But it seems to matter. He does live
there, and I've many videos like this of
people that are literally in town. You could
confirm it by the buildings behind him and
so on. And they're saying, I'm I'm not
seeing any. You'd you'd think that there'd be
a kind of a large conversation right now
in the location that is sort of like
the central conversation
of this ring. And think about how dumb
that is right now with all the things
going on that this is what most people
are talking about in the paradigm. Springfield, Ohio.
Look, Springfield, the nest.
See that water tower? Water tower that everyone
shows to confirm they're there. It's been happening
a lot of these videos. Right there.
A lot of chatter says
Springfield,
Clark County, Ohio.
Trust me.
I'm in these streets. I'm in these streets
every day.
I deal
with people every single day. Every day.
None of this bullshit's going on.
I own this barbershop right here. I got
a lot of Haitian clients coming in here.
Haitians all through these neighborhoods, all in all.
Yeah. Good. Because there's half the population. That
perfect that makes sense. Now, again, that point
needs to be fleshed out.
Why is that allowed? Is there some kind
of an overlapping
interest to the per for the government there
locally that they're benefiting from allowing that? Like,
nobody should be okay with that, even if
they were again from the next town over.
You're changing the demographic or rather specifically just
the dynamic of the city, but in this
case, the demographic too,
radically in a short period of time. That
dish that's just ridiculous. That's not good government
policy.
Period.
All these streets,
none of this bullshit that you hear
is happening. Happening. You get it. This I
mean, very clearly, he's telling you it's not
happening in his opinion. So take that for
what you will. I'm hoping that people out
there watching are able to be objective about
this, which I know that's why you're here.
Because, I mean, and check, by the way,
we we almost have 3,000 people tuned in
just on Twitter. So it's clear that people
are interested in an objective perspective.
I wonder why.
So my god. 3 and a half, 5
and a half hours. That's that's, that might
be a record. I can't remember. We might
have done a 6 before, but,
you know, the the schedule is killing me
because I do so much more on these
shows because I feel like I'm missing everything
because I'm getting pulled in a 1,000 different
directions. I'm I'm I'm almost there. We're gonna
we got the website back in a new
server so I I feel like we're gonna
be, you know, getting closer to getting back
on schedule to what we're trying to do.
But any case, I'm trying to do my
best to get this stuff in front of
you when I can. So thank you for
your support. Thank you for continuing to back
what we do.
We got we got some I'm gonna get
into probably in the next show, I'm gonna
give you some more updates on
who we might even have a video before
then about the Independent Media Alliance. We're we're
gonna be starting some new panels and we
wanted we're getting our ducks in a row,
no pun intended, around what's going on here
and we're trying to get organized about, you
know, making sure we're gonna start on the
best foot.
But we'll have some more coming for you
very soon, so look forward to that because
it's gonna be pretty cool. We got some
pretty exciting things around the as as we're
as we're hearing about the odyssey overlap and
what they were you know, the idea of
a a potential platform for us to be
putting this out on, the first decentralized
independent media network.
That's exciting.
Not cryptocurrency,
but decentralized, which we all should want.
That's pretty powerful, guys. That's history, in fact.
So we'll be talking more about that coming
up. So thank you for being here. Thank
you for your support.
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
And mighty because tomorrow I may fall down
on my bed. So let's empty for sunshine.
Yeah.