Welcome to the daily wrap up. A concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Thursday, September 12, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
I appreciate those of you that expressed concern.
I know it's been a while since we
had that kind of a gap for the
daily wrap up at least. But I just
you know, in general,
most of you know what's going on, but
not to waste time to start in general.
It seems like the entire world is
conspiring against me to stop me from doing
this show,
but I won't stop no matter what. So
make sure you remember that. I'm gonna be
here. And, of course, if you are not
seeing the daily wrap up, first, make sure
you check the website.
Because a lot of people, when we got
kicked off other platforms, YouTube, for example, were
quick to say, it looks like Ryan stopped
working. Corbett made the same point, and we
were just, you know, just as prolific that
we are on different platforms. So first, check
the the website itself. Make sure these platforms
aren't removing something.
Then if you're not seeing any content on
the website itself, which, by the way, if
there's even written articles, that's me doing that,
posting those, editing them so you know that
I'm there. But, also, unfortunately, probably just Twitter
is where I'm engaging in most part. So
you'll see me on the days where I'm
not doing the show just in case you're
worried something else is going on. But thank
you for those that were expressing concerns. So
definitely a lot to get to.
In general, there's just a lot, you know,
whether personal or whether lawsuit.
There's a lot of stuff that seems to
be taking up all of my time these
days, but I'm doing everything I can to
kinda channel this back in. And as well
as, honestly,
considering,
you know, this will never stop, to be
clear. Other things that we could bring into
the fold, other versions even, like, we're thinking
of there's ways that I could
jump off for 30 minutes and get something
out there that would be it's just so
hard for me to do this show, which
takes a lot of time, a lot of
prep, even just day to day, like, the
individual day setting up the show, the title,
the image, all sorts of stuff. So I'm
trying to think, if you have any ideas,
reach out to me. The different
styles I could do or little smaller clips.
So we do the clips and they break
them down from the show, but I find
it difficult for myself to do focused one
topic short videos only because of the way
we've been doing this for so long. I
have so much I wanna include.
But all that's to say, that we will,
sorry. I got distracted by the chat. I
wanna address that. But that I will I'm
thinking of new ways to to evolve this
and and get more work out there. But
that was one of the other things, by
the way, that they're mentioning in the chat
that in the last 4 days, really, it
hasn't technically been resolved. But
after, what was it? 4 days? After the
Catherine Austin Fitts interview. We've had we've had
nonstop attacks on this platform as far as
I've been long been doing this. But, really,
during the interview with Catherine Austin Fitts, I've
never seen that much
near continual suppression.
And, you know, usually, there's something like, oh,
the Internet's down or not bad connection.
Not to get all the details, but from
my end, everything was perfect. Everything else was
working.
I would literally have a 1,000 upload a
1,000,
m s, 1 gig upload,
which is just incredibly fast. That's it's I've
I've never heard that anywhere. It's fiber. It's
incredibly fast, and yet this thing was dipping
out every 10 seconds. Weird parts of the
conversation was getting missed, and it was so
frustrating. And then since that day forward, the
website has been, I mean, chaos,
up and down. We don't know why. So
right now, so you guys know, we're in
the process of making some moves and prefer
to leave it like that until we're down
with what we're doing. And, ultimately, there might
be some downtime
going from today forward that might be, potentially
expected
with different moves and so on. But at
the end of the day, what's been happening
over the last couple of days is crazy.
I mean, it's it's exactly what I expect,
post Gator and whatever else. I mean, I'm
not gonna assume, but it just continues to
show me that we're on the right path.
And whether that's a glitch or whatever else.
So that's been taken up so much incredible
and so much of my time. But today,
I wanna make sure we get into some
important things. Really kinda playing catch up from
the last week or so about things that
I wanna make sure we get our our
I give my thoughts on that in case
you didn't see it that you know is
happening. And, of course, we're gonna touch on
the debate and the illusion the absurd theater
of all of it. And, you know, really
highlighting what's going on in the world that
these
ridiculous illusions are distracting from. But give my
points on why these things are important.
And, you know, there's a couple of things
we're gonna get into. I really wanna I
I've been,
in my opinion,
failing in my duties even in regard to
highlighting what's been going on with Gaza, with
the West Bank. I've been highlighting some of
the things that have been happening, but I'm
gonna do take some time today. Probably gonna
be a long show and make sure we're
highlighting,
like I like I frame the title. Just
the erasure of all Palestine.
I mean, because let's let's be clear about
this. We'll get to in the latter half
of the show. The war or whatever you
wanna call it, the ongoing genocide has completely
shifted into the West Bank. It always was
happening, but now as even has been stated,
which I have I don't think I've seen
anybody point at. I know somebody out there
has, but that's one of these are the
kind of things that make me so angry
that I can't jump on there and get
these out. That Israel publicly said, this is
now a new phase of the war. Like,
we're gonna treat West Bank like another phase
of Gaza. Like, a part this this is
in Israel proper if, you know, the way
they would frame it anyway even though technically
it's all part of occupied Palestine.
And they're arresting and then detaining and torturing
and raping and burning image. Everything you've seen
over here and really what has been going
on with Zionist influence in Palestine,
but with very little discussion.
An American was killed, which by the way,
it's another human life. Shouldn't be any more
or less important than all the other humans
being murdered by Israel right now. But from
an American government perspective, that's clearly something that
needs to be discussed.
I'm I'm hoping you've all seen this. It's
been days now, but I need to go
through this and highlight how incredible this really
is. How and then overlap that with people
like Sherry Sherry Nabeau O'Klay
and and a journalist at that time that
was murdered by Israel and the, like, 3
week phase of how their narrative shifted and
evolved and really just got cobbled together. No.
We didn't. You're lying. It was Hamas. No.
It was us. It was an accident. Oh,
it ricocheted. Never mind. Shut up. We're not
you know, it's it's every time it's the
same way. And we're gonna go through that
and show you how incredible it is that
your government is ignoring that, wherever you may
be in the world. But we're gonna start
with the conversation around
the 2 party illusion. I wanna highlight our
interview with Catherine, talk about some interesting points
around
the the larger deception in there. Some kind
of scattering points to start, but I wanna
make sure we talk about the,
as I call it, the meaningless debate. And
I'll get into why I think that there
are some interesting things that happen, but it's
they're lying about everything, both of them, all
the time, otherwise known as politics. And everyone's
already decided who they're gonna vote for. So
what was Stahl a big theater show apparently?
And we'll go through that and the thing
things that stand out, talk about some of
the points that I think are highlighting something
very interesting around the Republican party in particular
about somebody that he I'm not gonna hide
my disdain for, and we'll get to that.
And I you know, I'm try I'm gonna
try not to enjoy highlighting how refined this
is to show how
this whole thing is happening. I I don't
wanna jump into it just yet. I've got
I'll say one word. I'll jump into it.
But you'll see when we get there. And
we're gonna talk about Syria as well. Robert
wrote a great article around Israel's unprovoked, I
think. I I I don't wanna misquote it.
We'll read through it. But 70 there it
is. 70 70 times.
70 different times since the beginning of just
the war on Gaza.
And you may be you'd be forgiven for
pretending for thinking that means 75 years. No.
Just this current war on Gaza
since October 7th is the point. 70 times
Israel has attacked Syria.
Why isn't that being talked about? A point
that I'm gonna get into that I'm absolutely
blown away by is the fact that Syria
well, I guess I shouldn't say blown away
by, but is such an important point. I
say that because I don't have any faith
in these institutions, but that they have been
going
every time to the United Nations.
Every time. They don't respond. They don't militarily
react like the the US and Israel will
bluster into another
7 wars because you looked at them funny
like I'm being facetious, but the idea being
that they will immediately act with illegal
killing civilians, also, you know, war, kinetic action.
Syria,
even with Russian backing, has not responded every
time they carry out an openly,
unquestionably illegal attack, usually on civilian locations like
this last one. And I go to the
UN, they petition the UN, and nothing happens.
So all that needs to show you is
that this is a broken system.
Same points we'll make about the election and
voting in general, but realize that when we
see that, we can't just go, okay. Let's
go back to the United. Even though you'll
show a mechanism that seems to be in
some way well, really, it's the ICJ and
the ICC, but the United Nations angle of
this has driven some action in regard to
what's going on here. I think it's simply
out of desperation
seeing that everyone sees what Israel is doing
and what they are.
Zionism, in particular. Not all Jews are Israelis.
But my point is that it needs to
still make you recognize that this is something
that is designed, at least to this point
today,
to not work. But that is, in a
weird way, the way it's supposed to work.
And that's how this is being played. But
all that shows you is that if you
don't just go back to the UN tomorrow
and say, well, we want this or here's
a resolution. If we can see it not
working, we need to address that now. Just
like the voting, just like anything else we'll
talk about.
Then you can have change. But just to
pretend like, well, just go back no. That's
failure. That is them allowing what's going on
as well as with Gaza, by the way.
But, yeah. As as I said, see, I
jumped into it and I wanna talk about
it. We'll get back to that in a
second. I wanna start today
with a couple of quick points since we're
not gonna focus on this anywhere else. Just
a couple of things that stood out to
me that I think are interesting and noteworthy
around the medical freedom conversation, specifically COVID 19
shots. Moderna
shares plunge,
which is by the way, you know, good
and really I don't know why anybody would
be supporting a company like this that invested,
you know, its entire success is on the
back of something. We're all kinda like, yeah,
that actually hurt everyone and we all know
that. But it's winning and succeeding because the
government's telling you everything's they're all buying, Josh.
The point is
Moderna, I think they all know they know.
Pfizer probably as well with the countless amount
of lawsuits and all the you know, they
they know they're inside. They know the government
is kind of subsidizing what they're doing, but
at the same time, they know we all
see them. So it's interesting. But my point
is
their shares
plunge. Why? Well, on plans to cut $1,100,000,000
in costs,
but launch 10 new products by 2027.
That sounds fun. Let let's let's think about
this. A company that has wrapped a little
both Pfizer and Moderna,
rushed out something that was done previously in
years, but in this time in months because
Trump made it all work for everybody, and
he's still owning that, saying it's a success
and you don't get hurt by all this
despite us all knowing that's not true.
But we're gonna now cut costs and increase
production
with things that are killing people. That sounds
like that's gonna work out real well. I
just want us to recognize that this is
what was always going to happen. This is
a company that is being used. Like, we're
we're we're shrinking research time, we're shrinking safety
testing time, in fact, it's non existent it
seems.
And then you're rapidly producing at a time
you know, what? A quarter if not less
of the time it used to take? And
now cutting cost and doing 10 times because
remember, they had one product. That was the
shot. And now they're gonna do 10 more
with a 1,000,000,000 less you get the point.
I think that's sort of funny in a
really scary way, but I just think we,
as the peoples of the world, need to
just go,
no.
No. Never mind. We're not doing that. You
can make whatever you want. We're all we
need to just start recognizing these things and
standing by our principles and seeing that others
will do the same. And then what you'll
end up with is this fraction of people
acting like they're the whole conversation, screaming that
you're all dumb, but then they realize, but
nobody's listening to us. That's happening with the
election. That's the ones telling you you're the
only adult adults will vote lesser in evils
and all these ridiculous
counterintuitive
things, but we sway because we're, you know,
we're herd animals at the end of the
day.
Here, Mary Talley Bowden points something else out.
Houston's largest school, and this is posted on
September 11th,
sent out a letter urging students to get
vaccinated
based on increased COVID in the wastewater.
Now here's a good example. 1, just to
recognize this is sort of like medical precrime
in a way or at least medical well,
it's not precr I mean, in I guess
it could morph into literal precrime at some
point using wastewater, but I would argue this
is about, you know,
there's an illusion therein.
Now let's just say first of all, there
is COVID remnants in the wastewater. I've always
felt like that's a little bit of a
there's a weird thing with that in regard
to privacy, I guess. But technically, it's, you
know, whatever. But the real point is about
ultimately,
I don't trust them. I don't think you
do either.
So how much we how at what point,
if well, maybe not now, at some point
in the future, will they go, oh, is
the thing happening? And lock down, because we
see it coming. Whitney and I talked about
this, like, in 2020.
Or maybe 2021.
And really, credit to Whitney and her work.
So think about how incredible it is, 1,
how far ahead she tends to be on
these stories when things that like, my point
is this stuff comes out and, like, in
maybe another year, it'll become like a focal
point and it'll become a a system they're
setting up. And nobody will remember that she
was waving her hands and screaming and jumping
up and down about how this was happening
4 years ago.
There there is sort of a detriment to
being that far ahead of a story, and
we we bump up against that all the
time. The point though is to recognize that
I don't believe that we can I mean,
they could just make this up? Or they
could be using PCR test, which guess what?
In many cases, that error that is what
they're using to claim one one of these
things are present.
They're now using PCR test in just about
every level of testing for monkeypox, whatever else.
We we seem to have all acknowledged that
that's a they're using it inappropriately to make
it as clear as possible without going into
it all. So this scares me. It genuinely
does that they're now going and, you know,
maybe urging shots. But by the way, urging
shots that are very deadly, especially for children.
2
children, but bigger than that simply that at
what point does this
agenda verge back in, you know, veer back
into well, you kinda have to now. Or
to go to school or maybe you can't
do this if you do that. We all
know that's right there. It's right in the
wings. Maybe it doesn't come back. I hope
not. But we know it's there. And do
you they I find I'll just put it
this way. I rarely see government have tools
of authoritarian use that they never that they
put down and never pick up again. Or
quite frankly, let's put it they never put
it down. Right? The Patriot Act, whatever else.
It just kinda gets disconnected. We don't point
at it until suddenly it's right in your
face again. That's what this may be. Or
is, quite frankly. So we'll come back to
this as it develops as always, but, you
know, we need to recognize that this is
still there. And that's my point from the
beginning.
Say no. We will not comply.
Period. And, yeah, that often comes with consequences,
especially when there's too many people that wanna
be passive about it. But stand your ground.
Stand your ground.
Now
starting with a point from James Melville, I
really appreciate it, into the 2 party illusion
kind of conversation.
And he re it reads literally everything
is questionable now.
Which I appreciate because, I mean, quite frankly,
I've been saying this since I've started doing
this work. I'm actually kind of all I've
always been shocked that we don't have an
inherent mindset of question everything all the time.
Which doesn't mean ignore anything. It literally means
question everything because you're engaging with everything. You're
entertaining all possibilities, but then equally skeptical to
all of them. To some people, that's like,
oh, it's exhausting. That's only because you well,
look. Put it this way. If you're not
willing to do your due diligence on things,
then don't pretend like you have the ability
you know, you're not in a place to
sit down and inform people of what's going
on. That's okay. Not everyone has to do
that.
But the reality being,
we should've always been absolutely engaging with all
these data points and questioning them if you
truly wanna stand up and go, here's what
I think is happening. You know, in a
context of corporate news and and whatever else.
The fact that we're in a position where
we just go, well, I'm on this side
or this team, or I'll ignore that, or
that this person has clout and he said
this and he's got a background, or a
doctor, or the FBI, or the media.
It applies the same way everywhere. So I
just am really happy to see people pointing
this out, because this this is like 1
+1 equals 2 to me.
The line he says, literally everything is questionable
now. The lines between fact and fiction have
become blurred.
What our leaders and mainstream media peddle as
the truth is often misinformation. Now I argue
simply that's pretty much always how it's been.
We're just, for whatever reason, becoming aware of
this.
Now obviously, it degrees of of change, but
I truly think we've all whether, you know,
before the media, before tea, before the internet,
going back a 100 year, over 200 years,
I argue that there's always some form of
people in power
using what they can to manipulate you into
a position that's advantageous for them. I mean,
this is just the way people work. And
it goes on to say, and what is
really the truth is smeared as misinformation.
In an era of rolling news and social
media, the bamboozle has captured us. Now that
point, I think, is what's most important. It's
because of these new tools that people have
become so immersed in this that they can't
see beyond their own hand. I mean, they
can't see anything. They're seeing only what is
presented in front of them. The the Plato's
cave scenario. Now it says, in in particular,
are elites, elitists,
masquerading
their greed as virtue or any other Orwellian
dynamic?
Ignorance as strength. This is exactly what we're
living through. They're literally pointing at their greed,
at their hatred, at their war, at their
belligerence and going this is what powerful people
do. This is what you should be striving
for. And people in the paradigm
fall for it. Or they don't care, they're
having fun, they don't like the other side,
whatever the narrative is or their logic,
we see this. We all see it. Now
most everybody sees it except in the paradigm,
they just wanna point at the other side.
Even though anybody outside of that can go,
you're both doing the same thing in a
little bit different way.
The modern world is a is a,
I forgot to,
look that I looked it up and it
it's simulacrum.
I've never even seen that word before. Apparently
it means an image or representation of someone
or something. I've heard fulcrum, but that doesn't
seem to be a similar it's interesting. But
anyway, so basically saying the modern world is
like an, an a representation, like an illusion,
a phantom,
largely caused by social media and increasingly AI,
where reality has been replaced by false messaging
and imagery.
K. This is Twitter. This is Twitter files.
It's all social media. That's what this is.
What he's talking about. I just tend to
point to Twitter files and so on because
I think it was one of the very
prominent example of how they were trying to
shift the way you engage with information.
It went from, well, anyone that still wanted
to or cared to, I wanna see source
material so I can verify this, to, well,
that person put it out. Here's a screenshot.
He probably has it behind there somewhere. And
I think they did at that time, but
the point wasn't about that. It was about
getting you comfortable accepting
a screenshot instead of more to back it
up. Because of the person behind the screen
not had it really the information was irrelevant.
That is exactly what we're dealing with.
Policy's irrelevant. I'm voting for him because she's
worse. See how that works? Or vice versa.
But it says it goes on to say,
to such an extent that one cannot at
times distinguish between the real and the unreal.
I mean, guys, this goes back to many
the quote from the CIA director, you know,
once every once everything Americans believe is false,
then our our
paraphrasing, then our job is done. And that
is a real quote, despite the pushback. I've
proven it many times. Direct direct statement from,
I think, the chief of staff who was
in that room who wrote this down.
That's what the objective is. At the very
least, it gets you to be unsure enough
to where you sit back and go, you
know, whatever. I'll let them decide. I can't
figure it out. That's by design.
Engineered apathy. It says, and as a result
of this, we end up with divide and
rule caused by manipulated confusion.
You know how easy it is to manipulate
a a an entire population who's lost in
that feeling, in that moment?
Easier than anything else. Because all you do
is pit them against each other, and you
stand back and do what you want.
The reality of all of this is that
we are sleepwalking towards the biggest asset grab
so k cah k, Catherine was talking about.
For all the actual assets in the world.
Land, you know, solid anything that's a real
solid tangible asset. And we're talking about the
powerful.
That's why she pointed out you got China
buying land in the United States, buying up
they're they're sweeping up farmland, Bill Gates. It's
all and this is a non partisan thing.
And the reality being
that we are watching this begin to happen
as they shift you into a digital world
where they can just print you know, it's
not printing anymore, they just
type they make whatever they want happen. The
reality is whatever they input.
And that's how that's that's currency, that's everything.
And so then suddenly, the only things that
are actually real are the actual assets, and
then we are engaging with the fantasy.
That's what that's what Catherine was talking about.
He says they are trying to destroy farms,
land, healthcare, businesses, freedoms, housing, individual wealth, and
data, and own them or sell them off
to the highest bidder. And at the same
time, they are trying to ring fence society
into the entrapment of being controlled by data.
Either through health passports or the slow mission
creep towards central banking digital currencies, CBDCs.
Or the privatized version of it, which is
just as day if not worse,
then that would be some kind of Jamie
Dimon, JPMorgan,
Trump
aspect, which is seriously in the works.
It's a giant asset grab of what we
own and control, he says.
They frame all of this being in our
interests,
But it's the biggest corporatist swindle ever.
They've done this before. In different generations with
different things. But it is happening again. This
is not new. As George Carlos said, he
writes, they don't care about you. But they
want to fool you into thinking that they
do.
And here we are. And that's not one
half, or part of it, or this guy,
or that it's all of them. It's Trump,
it's Kamala, it's RFK, it's it's the entire
problem.
And that's not black tailed
to acknowledge that we're in this. Because the
reality is, if you actually listen to what
we have to say, there is a lot
that we are putting forward as potential solutions
to that problem.
Not what I'm gonna get into today is
the focus of this point. And we've talked
about it. I mean, that's why I respect
Derek so much because his entire platform is
about exit and build. That doesn't mean move
out in the woods. It means exit from
the system. Whether that means digitally, voting, it
means exit and build something else. I just
had a conversation about this in an interview,
about the idea of building a new machine.
Right? Whatever that means to you. The idea
is we need to start and I said
in the same interview, I said, we need
to consider the fact
that have both conversations, as I keep saying,
despite being misrepresented
as always by the paradigm, p both sides,
that I am openly, continually, every time I
bring it up, saying, look, if you want
to vote, I
I I back your
choice in doing so. I don't think it
translates. But if that's something you believe in,
do what you believe in, but follow your
heart. To fall into lesser evils that are
both bad but she's not as bad, well,
that's clearly not what you want if that's
your opinion.
Don't fall into that trap. Don't listen to
their narratives and ex ex explanations
about how you're taking from this and you're
doing that.
Except every other moment that your vote matters
and you should do what you believe in.
They're inherently contradictory. And the bottom line is
whether you're talking about vote pack and Sam
Husseini's idea about 3rd party 3rd party voting
with the other side so you're not taking
a vote away, or actually just voting your
principles regardless of what everyone else tells you
to do,
or any numb or abstention, we've gone over
this a 1000 times.
The idea of falling into that trap is
exactly what he's talking about. We are binary.
We're falling into exactly the way we're being
played. My that's my opinion, obviously. But at
the end of the day, if we keep
seeing the same things over and over, and
the same policy, and the same and especially
since everyone seems to be feeling that this
one after this one might make it, we
won't be able to come back or this
will change everything. Well, yeah. What if you're
right?
In both cases, right? What if you stand
back and, like, if the idea is we
can't take a chance, we have to overturn
because she'll be that much worse,
well, what if you're wrong about Trump?
So now you're you're this by that same
logic, you're taking the chance on the other
side. My opinion is they're both the same
thing.
Both Coke or Pepsi will lead you into
the digital prison.
Now there's a lot of things to discuss
around what actions can be taken to stop
that. And I think what we're doing day
by day, anybody in this field that's actually
calling this out, is putting a stick in
the spokes. That's why we've seen so much
aggressive push back against this.
But
we'll talk I'll briefly say more about that
I think when we get to other points.
But I just think it's so important that
we continue to think about they at least
consider
the idea
about whether or not we've been put into
a place where we no longer actually have
we're we're on the we're the child steering
wheel in the car.
And you know that's possible. Anybody logical can
go, yeah. Certainly possible. And if you know
it's possible, then you have to engage with
the facts. And what the facts show us
is that both sides constantly make this point,
but when it comes to the time when
they both want you to engage, suddenly we
don't talk about it. Isn't that funny?
It's obvious is what it is. Now, we
had a great conversation with Catherine Austin Fitts.
See beyond the duopoly and take responsibility for
your future. It really is a power it's
crazy
crazy stuff we get into. She talks about
neuro weapons and and the the idea of
how they're this is an image. She's a
very intelligent person, and she has worked in
these deals.
And the idea being that this is something
that's being used. And I've had the whole
shows about this. And we've seen World Economic
Forum discussions about using this and that to
influence the the way you feel, the way
you think, and literally talking about using these
things to in to make you act against
your own interests. Seems to be happening in
many ways. She thinks that.
Overall, the point was simply about the illusion
and us taking responsibility
for what we want. Like, let's just say
even you think that Trump's gonna change everything.
I hope you're right. I don't know why
everybody would hope otherwise.
The point is that even if that's true,
if they get put into place, the point
is that everything that you may want, the
changes you may want, are only possible if
he keeps the machine going. If he keeps
the broken, corrupted machine that involves all the
same people you think you're fighting against in
play.
She made an excellent point in this. And
so the point comes down to yet again,
it's not about whether you vote. It's about
you and your actions and your responsibility for
your life. And at the end of the
day, we need to change that. And that
may be, as she points out, making new
options, fixing the machine, or I think making
a new one. The point is going through
the same path is going to give you
the same thing.
Well, you need to take responsibility and really
take it away from them.
Because if you know that he's gonna step
in there, and even if he wanted to
take all these actions, he turns around and
realizes the only way I can do that
would be to destroy the actual background that
allows me to take these actions with funding
or whatever else. She makes a very good
case about this. And I think we all
acknowledge how broken, corrupted by banks and big
pharma and foreign entities.
Everything is from both sides.
But, yeah, just she's a little less or
he's a little less. Let's vote that way.
Knowing all of that, doesn't that seem childish?
Now, again, to be clear, what I'm saying
this is what people I I get why
people can mishear that. My point is, like
I said, was not that, but voting what
you believe. I argue still it doesn't have
an effect. But in that dynamic,
if just picking the lesser of evils, that
that seems crazy to me.
Knowing what we just discussed,
especially as well, voting local, is
obviously something, if any of it's gonna make
a difference, that's your direction. But, any case,
I I also talked about this, which I
wanna make sure we would think about. Because
this overlap with the voting conversation.
We I I talked about this on on,
David Ike show, over g Allen. Like, this
is an important conversation about Honduras.
Peter Thiel's
company, who is basically
occupying Honduras illegally.
2009, they overthrew Honduras. The US backed it.
It caused chaos. They used that chaos to
create special development zones called zedis there. But
this is
sustainable development goals are one of the points
in this in the 2030 agenda. And that's
what these are.
Thiel, who put fans in Trump's cabinet who
is backing all of them. There's a thousand
of points you can highlight which shows you
the contradictions.
Point is they use this to create these
zones and then use that to create what
they're claiming are libertarian utopias, but have barely
built anything and then they're not even remotely
libertarian, neither is Peter Thiel, by the way.
The point is that they then created this
and people around them are saying you're taking
this
you're violating our sovereignty.
Now once they got people back in power
that were listening to the people, the bottom
line is the people that were there because
of the US government were indicted. And even
the US government calls them criminals today. So
it shows you how this was all a
manipulation. The point is they then passed a
law that stopped this. While the illegal government
was in power, they couldn't get it to
pass. You know what they did? They removed
judges and put judges in place that voted
the way they wanted to. That's an illegal
government because it was based on a coup
and nobody wanted it. And that's how they
got it. Now that it's been removed, well,
they're not stopping. So there's no law that
allows them to do this anymore and they're
already building another one on the same island
that this Prospera
utopia is built.
And on top of that,
they are openly saying their their the government
of Honduras is saying the US government is
about to cool us again. They're saying that
right now publicly, September 5th.
And that's why I think the Thiel's company
is not stopping because they think, well, we're
gonna have someone in power that will allow
us to have my opinion. Either way, the
point is, what does voting voting ultimately matter
if we end up in a position where
technocrat elitist with their corporations
are taking control of territory
where they in this the point is they
have their own law law, their police, their
own law system, their own tax system
inside of Honduras.
And on top of that, now that they've
revoked their con their their the law, they're
suing Honduras for $11,000,000,000.
The GDP of Honduras entirely is like a
35,000,000,000.
New York Times believes they're gonna win. So
what happens when they take all the assets?
But the government's still there. Are they even
in control? It's an illusion. So we're watching
the technocratic takeover of other country. Maybe as
a starting point, maybe as a litmus test.
I don't know.
End of the day, this is terrifying to
me because we're watching Technocracy
literally show its face and start taking over
different territories.
There's multiple things like this in just Honduras.
And guess what? It's not just about Honduras.
Israel
is a huge part of it as well.
Big surprise. Actually, a huge part. But let's
talk about that. Because this story is important
to me. So we we did a little
breakdown on this. Make sure you check this
out. A little clip that,
Jason Basler did for us. Who's you know,
it's if you don't know, t's part of
TLAB now and he's doing I gotta add
him to the website. He's doing the clips
for us like Brock do but Brock does,
but sort of on Twitter and smaller like
MeWe and different platforms.
But Mark also adds a good point. He
says, isn't this the same as the special
economic zones that Matt Kennard talks about in
his book, Silent Coup, How Corporations Overthrow Democracy?
100%.
I actually reached out to Matt. If you
know him, let him know I'd like to
interview him because this is exactly what we're
talking about. And this is not new by
any means. This has been going on for
a while, and Matt was covering this in
his book, Silent Coup. That's exactly what we're
talking about, but this this technocratic
overlap is what I think is the newer
angle to it. But here's what's important.
We talked about this as well. Right at
the time when this all was kicking off,
guess what Honduras had done? Well, they removed
their ambassadors from Israel. Or not right when
it kicked off,
but post October 7th.
And this is a lawsuit that's happening and
they call it out. They removed their ambassadors
from Israel because they're committing genocide. And then
what do you know? All of this starts
getting more intense. I find that interesting.
Or and on top of that, their Israel
is absolutely overlapped with a lot of the
different dynamics we're discussing, whether US foreign policy
or their entire
I think the overlapping of the globalist idea
is very clearly tied.
But on top of that,
armed by Israel,
Honduras' illegal regime returns the favor at the
UN. That's 2017.
So big surprise. Not only did the US
government back the regime change, but the illegal
entity they put in place was being armed
and backed by Israel. So maybe they didn't
like that that entity being removed.
Here's another example.
Honduras recalls ambassador to Israel condemning the humanitarian
situation. That's, again, that's the point I was
making. 2023.
Here is a point from March 8, 2024.
Israeli official faces corruption allegations in Honduras' president's
trial. You know what it's for?
A witness to the trial accused an unnamed
member of the Israeli embassy in Colombia of
participating
in a cocaine ring. You know, often I
mentioned Colombia and the idea that they export
more cocaine than anybody, but they never bring
it up, but they'll love to throw narco
trafficking at Venezuela that produces a fraction of
that. It's just it's so dishonest. Everything they
are is dishonest. They don't believe in anything.
And Israel plays a central role in what's
going on there.
Now Whitney also points this out about Peter
Thiel.
People who keep claiming Peter Thiel is a
libertarian need to qualify that he is not
a free market libertarian. I argue not at
all, but a cartel market libertarian.
He openly hates free market competition and favors
monopolies. I would argue that right there alone
makes him not a libertarian.
But she says even worse, his monopolies, PayPal,
Palantir,
he built with 3 letter agencies. You know,
the worst embodiment of what government is, the
opposite of what libertarians want. He says, the
worst part of the state. Oh, she says.
She goes on to say, Theo is about
building monopolies controlled by a cartel. He is
more of a Mussolini corporatist than a libertarian.
Or the white I mean, the fascist.
This is also, she says, the guy who
made Trump's VP, who he is. And he
openly doesn't like a free market. Yet somehow
the market cons free market conservatives don't care
and call her a communist and or Iranian
agent for pointing it out. Lazy. Lazy allegations
that have no basis in reality because you
must be that if you're saying this, binary
thinkers. That's how it works.
Now, like I said before, don't forget, Trump
says he's mulling Jamie Dimon for US Treasury
because there's the JPMorgan overlap. There's your private
coin. Now that's a prediction, but it seems
to be developing as we talk. That's Whitney
is the one that pointed that out.
So no CBDCs, but here's your privatized version
of it that's way worse. Sort of like
Palantir with the privatized version of what they
tried to do with Lifelog and,
was it main core? These are things that,
specifically Lifelog, was a public public thing that
everybody pushed back on, privacy. And they said,
okay. We hear you. And then privatized it.
That's Peter Thiel, Palantir.
Working Working with Israel to commit the genocide
right now.
Now let's not forget, Donald Trump
openly is discussing the idea of the biometric
tracking system. And other videos on here is
him saying that the injection is good and
no one died from it and helps everyone.
Lies. All lies. And he knows that. As
well as the one that literally says Israel
had control over congress before and rightly so,
and I'll make sure that happens again. Three
videos he says that in.
And then down here is a video of
him saying we should
shut down close-up the Internet. Saying we should
work with Bill Gates to close-up the Internet
because people are working with ISIS. That's what
he said. It's a while ago. This one's
him saying, take the guns. Due process later.
You know, all these very un you know,
inconsequential
stances. Right?
Some incredible people will ignore. And sure, maybe
he's changed his opinion, but almost all of
them he still says today. So, you know,
craziness.
And then the ones that are the additional
ones. These other clips where he's also saying
that Israel should control congress.
Blows me away.
Now, Whitney also points out some people who
claim to care about Epstein's crimes,
and the which, you know, predominantly Republicans it
would seem, but we all should care.
And also and, basically, some of the people
who claim to care about Epstein's crimes and
abuse of minors
will also tell you that we should keep
giving Epstein's state sponsor
1,000,000,000 of dollars and lots of weapons so
they can continue murdering minors. Can you guess
what she means? Yeah. The genocide is real.
That's what she's talking about, because it's the
truth.
She says those people suck. The reality is,
Acosta and plenty of others have already let
the cat out of the bag. He was
an asset of Mossad and the CIA. Sort
of like the people that killed JFK. That's
the reality. The point is that there are
people that are pretending, we don't see that.
We're gonna keep funding this even though we
pretend we care about this. You can't. They're
these are the same conversation.
There's too many of these people today that
are grifting out there. Now in another note
around Twitter I just wanna include, there's there's
a lot of this going on. I mean,
I overlapped the Brazil conversation with the the
Honduras Prospera point. At least for us just
to consider there is another angle to that
story, while also acknowledging Brazil is clearly censoring
its own people in order to stop whatever
they think they're stopping. Maybe it's illegitimate. The
point is, you can't stop people from using
VPNs. You can't kick them off a platform
because you don't like what Elon may actually
be doing or people that he's working with,
whatever. My point was simply like, at least
consider the fact that maybe they were actually
doing something. Like, my point I said is
imagine Elon Musk came up today and said,
I've identified
10 different Chinese nationals working for the government
that are pretending to be other accounts on
Twitter. Do you think anybody would cry for
censorship if he deleted them? We wouldn't nobody
would be able to prove that.
We'd all be like, okay. Well, I guess
we you know, the point is if they
are government entities, that wouldn't be censorship, they
are breaking the law. So the point is,
how do we know what's really going on
with people that are doing I I I've
not tried to defend Brazil. I quite frankly,
I think they're completely happy censoring people for
their own interests. Like every government anywhere, I'm
not defending governments. But at the end of
the day, we need to be open minded
enough to see that there may be the
other side of that story. That he may
in fact be using this this platform to
do like what he tried to do with
Venezuela. You know, influence the election. When this
comes up to the November, it's gonna be
a very interesting overlap for people screaming your
anti Trump or anti free speech by simply
pointing out that he is in fact using
this to carry out very weird actions.
Now my point is that he has a
right to free speech too. But once he
becomes a member of the cabinet, well, suddenly
he's part of the government. And quite frankly,
he's a contractor for them anyway.
That changes the whole story, doesn't it?
Now he's influencing based as a government entity.
Now, again, there's people on platform. They always
love to play the game. Well, I'm speaking
as a private citizen. It's like, well, they
do have free speech there. But the end
of the day, it comes down to the
actions. So all I'm asking is to consider
all possibilities and recognize that there is a
very obvious technocratic agenda taking place in front
of us, and he has a central role
in that.
Now here's the article
from September 6th. X Twitter complies with EU
data laws. Stops AI chatbot data collection. Is
it funny?
Yeah. The thing they're like, we're totally not
doing that. There's no bots and yeah. Except
all the Israel bots that are absolutely scooping
up all your information for their interest or
using Authentix to continue to verify people, which
is an Israeli unit a200 intelligence entity that
is clearly taking your biometric data as it
says right in the terms of service.
They're They're still using that right now despite
him lying about Stripe.
Here, x Twitter complies with EU
data laws.
Okay. Well, I mean, he he could've just
as easily been like censorship and or whatever
else. But it technically, it's something different because
of what he's talking about is or they're
saying
their AI chat bots are taking people's data.
And they said no. And he's okay, we'll
stop. So that means it's happening to you
here.
At least acknowledge that and you shouldn't be
okay with that.
Now, David, I point something else out. And
this is just a larger point about the
kind of, like, what Catherine and I talked
about, 2 party illusion,
this really clear structure that's being built as
this false alternative media. He says, does anyone
this is just a clip from this guy,
George. You're just like a shameless promoter of
people who says the most incorrect things like,
this is the most crazy I mean, I
think it doesn't matter. Like, just, you know,
making things hyperbolic.
Like, the like, you know, like with anything
else we've talked about with Trump or anything
else, he's a blind this is unprecedented.
It's never seen a speech that's so powerful.
He said, like, the debate. Like, Trump won
more than I've ever seen anybody win anything
ever. It's like you guys are just blindly
supporting.
But David Icke says, does anyone really think
that the cult and this is he's referring
to the the what we're always discussing. You
know, he calls it the cult of you
know, the point is, like, this conglomerate, the
2 party illusion with these fake personalities that
are pretending to be independent. That's what he's
all highlighting as a large thing. And he
says the cult is do you really think
the cult is so stupid that it would
quote fire Tucker Carlson for Fox News
and not know this would make him immediately
an alternative superstar with a vastly bigger audience
on Musk's Twitter.
That's exactly what I said from the beginning.
In fact, I've never even seen it proven
that he was even technically fired. Remember, when
he left, he was technically still under contract
when he started this.
That to me seems legally
really fishy. But either way, let's just say
they went on and fired him. For what
reason? I know they've got a narrative. He's
one of the most popular characters in this
conversation and they're just gonna, yeah. Like, let's
be real. It's not a new organization. This
is a business.
And you think they're gonna get rid of
their money? Come on. I mean, look. I
I it's certainly possible.
But I think even if they did, I
agree with what he's talking about here. This
was an organized concept in my opinion. That's
for you to decide for yourself. The idea
of turning this into the like, it's what
I keep pointing out. Whether it's Musk or
Tucker, we're in a position where people are
looking to new voices and look at that.
Boom. They create one out of somebody who
was 30 seconds ago part of the system.
I see everything now and now I'm independent
and so people kinda flock to that. Well,
he's independent. He's not part It's that easy,
guys, in some cases. But I increasingly think
it's failing.
I really do. They they're more about they're
more percenting you as the idea that everyone
supports him, when maybe not. Alright. Think for
yourselves.
But he says,
is anyone really that naive?
So why did they do it? He says,
think outside the box. Think how the cult
thinks. World events
then look very different.
Now, he's not just telling you how to
think. Right? He's giving you the tools to
think about it for yourself.
I agree.
Now, we're gonna come back to the story
about Syria, but I wanted to point out
something that Dave said here. Which I think
is interesting.
It was a post about Syria.
And I it was I've I've been putting
out all of our written articles on Substack.
And really in a way to keep this
go I mean, I'm gonna keep posting on
Substack
in general, other things that but mostly the
right written content. But if and when there's
an issue with the website, I'll be posting
my shows there as well. But I kinda
like this being sort of the written content.
But
he rightly says, which is fair, which other
than, you know, I mean fair to point
it out, he thinks this is the reality.
I don't know what you can take from
this as you will or if it's even
true. I mean maybe. But he says, I
appreciate your content,
but the main investor of substack is not
your friend, which I don't believe is, I
don't trust any of these people. But says
it also invests in communistic
tiny homes
and 50 minute cities. Which, you know, tiny
homes are not communistic. I'm a huge supporter
of tiny homes in any sense because it's
about it's about lessening your footprint in general,
about living in a minimalist way. But, you
know, the republicans have grabbed this and made
it about communist everything. Anything we do, it's
just a sad state of affairs.
But the idea obviously fit him in the
cities, but don't forget, that's might as well
be what we're talking about in Honduras, the
way that they're building this, the technocratic
build. Anyway,
the point is he he can say, hey,
worry about this. But my point is,
I'm just using Substack just like we're using
Twitter, which is also a thing to consider.
Maybe we shouldn't. Right? I agree with that.
But it it there's re there's a mixed
bag of reasons we've talked about on why
we still think we can use it to
reach and so on. I just simply said
this in response. And I wasn't darn mean.
I was trying to make a point. So
he said, I appreciate your content, but the
main investor of Substack is bad. I said,
I appreciate your comment, but the owner of
Twitter is not your friend. He also invests
in mRNA tech, artificial intelligence, brain to machine
interface tech, and over overtly stole sensors. I
hope you take my point, appreciate your support.
Here's what I here's where it was posted
first, which was TLF.
So it's interesting that we have these lines
that we draw, and that's the point I
wanted to make.
Dave I've Dave has made some great comments
in the past, I'm not trying to hate
on Dave. The idea is that we we
draw these lines for ourselves.
These red lines that thou shall not pass,
but then we kind of ignore
things that we don't. Like, it's our it's
it's subjective is the point. Because if you're
if we're gonna say, well, you know, this
sub sack, I don't know. Because, you know,
this person is an investor, which doesn't even
mean the people who are running it are
in fact beholden to that person. It can
mean that, and we should ask that question.
It usually does in these larger fields, but
just, you know, we have to be objective.
But we should consider that. The point is
that
Twitter is the words we're all using. It's
it doesn't make it any better. I'm just
making a fair point about how we should
consider that with all of these things, is
that it's clearly if one of the most
obvious example, the literal owner who's constantly using
it is the embodiment of all these problems.
Just because you don't wanna call it communist
or you don't wanna see it in one
light, the point is that it's the same
direction of what you're talking about, the few
minute cities, the technocracy.
So I just think we need to stand
back and think about that. I think the
way that we draw these lines can be
very dangerous. And all we need to do
is be open to all of it. Well,
check. We're considering everything.
Right? And just like with these platforms,
like, use Substack, use Twitter, use them as
or not if you think that's a line
for yourself that you wanna draw. But let's
be,
consistent
with that
idea.
You see what I'm saying? And I always
think that using Twitter, for example,
is right now, it is clearly the platform
that has the most influence in regard to
real time information, being able to reach people
on these platforms.
And, you know, and look, I'm I'm gonna
acknowledge that maybe I'm wrong in doing so.
Maybe I should've stopped using it a long
time ago like Corbett did. But I do
think that there is a, like, I've I've
made it with YouTube. Same reason I still
put my content there.
The most lost people in my mind, like,
not seeing the bigger picture are on these
platforms. And so my only job is to
reach people that don't know this yet. Not
just high five with those that already know.
Part of it is informing those people and
continuing to keep up to date as I
see it, but trying to reach the new
people. I just thought that was important to
point out. Now in regard to the democrat
party left of the left right paradigm, I
just think this is hilarious. And we keep
seeing this dumb stuff like, Gabbard, now a
Republican. Oh, Alan Dershowitz quits the Democrat party,
slams the anti Zionist DNC. Anti Zionist?
These people are ridiculous. Look. He is an
agent of the Zionist machine. It's very obvious
to me. And the bottom line is that
he is
switching parties? It's just like I said about
Gabbard. Oh, okay. So then you've admitted you
have no principles. Because let's not let's be
clear about this. This is not I'm just
aligned, like, that I'm I'm gonna stand with
these people.
Switching parties means we're supposed to pretend anyway
that you have a very different value set.
So are you saying that you no longer
believe anything you've believed your entire life but
now you switch? Well, no. He's not saying
that. He's just trying to make a point
because the reality of what they're showing you
is it's all meaningless. It's TeamSport politics.
Because the DNC is not anti Zionist. They
are openly,
gushingly supporting both like Kamala just said on
stage.
But this is about, look, look, we're this
is the side.
But let me put make something very clear.
Because I don't think anybody's really endorsed this
for this because
I don't think Alan Dershowitz joining your side
is as you know, is and what the
the boon he might've thought he was giving
them. Mister, I only wear my underwear. I
I I have my underwear on. It was
just a massage at Epstein's Island. This guy
is a creep. He is a disgusting human
being that has been openly supporting the worst
things I've seen for a long time. Bottom
line is that he is now switching over
to the other side, which is just it's
not one or the other. There again, it's
all one thing, guys, in my opinion. So
don't ever take my points as that waste
one side worse than the other. I I
think they're equally ridiculous.
This to me just simply
exemplifies that point.
Now I had a great conversation with with
David Knight, who I really appreciate talking with.
I'm I'm gonna be joining him again soon.
Actually, I wanna write that down.
Make sure I don't forget to respond to
but we had a really great
talk about a lot of stuff.
It it this is the, the the
RJ Phoenix is the one that posted this.
Great interview. Keep an eye on the UN
Summit of the Future, which we talk about.
We talk about the pact for the future
that's within that. We talk about the 2
party illusion, the the debate. Really enjoyed the
conversation. Just wanna make sure you guys saw
that because we really had focused on a
lot of this.
Now I wanna start play this clip kind
of to begin before we get into the
rest of it. Now you probably all seen
this already. This went around this went very
viral. But it is very and, again, on
top of that oh, by by the way,
I was I forgot to I wanna make
a point about that. I think this is
kinda crazy. Now this this is a very
viral clip. And I did get some pretty
good reach on it, but what's funny about
it is that these things I we this
was posted early in the comments before it
was really prolific.
Same point about David Knight. David Knight
has
a 137,000
followers,
which you've seen the equivalence of people out
there, even remote even close to a 100000,
to get, you know, a lot of engagement
if
they're engaging with the right algorithmic conversations or
in the right way. Now I say that
for a reason because there are people that
are on the same conversations, even making the
same points that don't get the reach because
they're not and they have the following.
It's very manipulated. Like, there's something that's what
I've been saying from the very beginning, and
I know you're all starting to see it,
if not already from the beginning.
Just because there's not as much blunt and
constant censorship, it is still there, by the
way, so it's not free speech.
There is a much more dark, surreptitious
social engineering dynamic going on right now. And
the point about that is trying to funnel
whether it's about setting people up to be
what they claim they would turn them into
on Twitter or just be about raising up
the voices that are subjective and deceiving and,
you know, whatever.
Never the objective nonpartisan voices.
Look at his content.
A 137,000
followers.
He's got 11 likes on this post.
Five likes.
Now you may say, oh, they don't like
his content. Well, these are people that are
subscribed. And even then, you don't get all
of them. The point is, if it works
a real way, you would it's it's pretty
much a mathematical thing. If you got this
much, you should get this percentage that kind
of engages with it. It's the usual metric.
He's being throttled. Look at the look at
the engagement on his posts. I I mean,
I'm actually blow it's less than I get.
I find that wild.
And I think it's because he is very
clearly, very critical of Musk, of Alex Jones,
of Tucker, of the 2 party illusion,
of all of it.
And he's a very he's got very bal
he's a he listened to. He's an intelligent
guy. I don't agree on everything he says,
but he clearly has a lot of important
things to say. And I wonder why this
platform is suppressing his content.
Same point for us. But let's get into
this because this tweet, this conversation from Massi,
by the way, is exactly what I think
they one of the many point their this
platform and this agenda is trying to keep
buried. Now before I even play this,
one of the things people brought up, which
I do agree with, we should consider at
the very least that this is, you know
and this is just being, like you know
I'm jaded about politics and all politicians.
Of all the people in this conversation, Massie,
who you know, current political figures in the
system,
he says I mean, I've I've damn near
agree with everything he says lately.
But just because of how jaded I am
and how clearly I am, you know, I
I we've we've been through this. I've seen
it. I've I've gotten hope for people and
then had it dashed to me over and
over and over and over like anybody else
in this process. My point in saying all
of that is that we should then still,
regardless of how right he's been, consider that
this is another kind of revelation of the
method kind of move. Where he comes out
and just highlights the thing that we're all
already seeing but in a public way from
the government so that starts a conversation but
it's in a controlled way. Now I don't
know if I believe that, but I think
it's worth considering
that, you know, he may be the next
one to run and end up continuing the
system.
I hope I'm wrong because I I really
like this guy from Kentucky that has a
lot of good things to say about a
lot of the different things. And, you know,
runs his own farm homestead and farm. These
are good things.
So what he's highlighting here is the idea
of the 2 party illusion in one way,
but also the save act in particular and
how they play these games. Now you don't
have to take this as the entire thing
is false. I believe that's the reality. At
the very least, recognize what he's saying is
they'll use what you care about as always
for momentum.
Even though they know it's not gonna happen.
In this case, the say back before the
election, which was the whole point about having
this in place so immigrants couldn't vote if
they're illegal.
Even though it's completely a Trojan horse for
digital ID. I'm convinced.
But they know it won't be there, so
why do they push it around the election?
Because they're trying to jam it down, get
at a point when you're distracted with your
emotional ideas about the election because so you
won't really think about the digital ID overlap.
That's what I think.
Here's what Thomas Massie had to say. I
think this is very powerful.
Be honest with the American people about what's
going on here. This is political theater.
I'm gonna call out both sides right here.
It's all posturing. It's fake fighting. We all
know where it ends up. This is Groundhog
Day. I don't care if the Democrat is
the speaker or a Republican is the speaker.
We always get a CR in September
and then we get an omnibus.
Sometimes there's a twist on that. We might
get the omnibus before Christmas,
but if we're not good, it comes after
Christmas.
But that's what's going to happen.
And in the meantime,
it's political theater.
You know, we've got some it's good theater.
We've got great writers.
I wish they'd just come up with a
new plot.
It's the same plot every fiscal year.
What So what do you think he meant
by that point by itself?
Great writers? Now, obviously, he could just be
playing into the analogy.
Right? Like, not necessarily pointing at some specific
group that's dictating their words.
But I wonder. Alright? Because it's an interesting
time to make this point. Nobody in this
room arguably wants this to be said out
loud. So when he says we've got great
writers, do you think he's simply playing into
the analogy and making it sound like this
is some script thing when really he means
we just kinda go through the motions that
we all know won't happen? Or does he
literally mean that somebody is, you know, maybe
not writing every word out, but kinda going
this is what we're gonna do today? It's
a very interesting thing to think about. Israel
was an obvious point to make or lobbying
in general or out of some kind of
other structure that we're not talking about. I
don't know. Interesting as hell. I mean, it
brings to mind an interesting thing that, by
the way, I still have never even looked
into after this is brought up.
Blows my mind, by the way, at least,
I mean, this whole conversation about, like, the
NFL and whether it's fake, it's it's crazy.
This slow news break day brought this up
to you, like, a few shows ago. I'm
like, what? I mean, I've always known that,
like, the refs cheat and, you know, whatever
else. This is a classic reality. But to
the point to where people argue that it's,
like, literally scripted. There's videos where they're reading
the scripts and making points. I just can't
I haven't got enough time to dive through
it. It could be some kind of a
big play, a joke. I don't know. You
know? It's like we need to ask whether
or not we there's a lot more than
we realize that is literally being scripted. I
just thought that was a fun point to
engage with. The point is obvious either way.
Should we be doing? It's already been discussed.
We should have done 12 separate bills.
We should have done 12 separate bills. But,
again, whether Democrats are in control or Republicans
are in control, we never do the 12
separate bills. You know, and my point on
why that's always the case is because with
12 separate bills,
it's much easier to fine tune to see
all of what's going on and the writers
get cut are much easier to see, which
is always what this is about in my
opinion. The I the there's, you know, this
is happening and then they, you know, there's
a point they disagree on and they go,
okay, well, let's slip this bill in here
at the end where nobody's looking and then
we'll and okay, then we'll overlook that. And
we've talked about this over the years. Usually,
50% of the time and I'm literally not
I mean, I'm not gonna say today but
when I was looking back in the day
when I made a point about this, you
look through the current legislation, any given moment
at that time, like, 50% of what was
being proposed in some way had Israel's name
in it. Things that had nothing to do
with it. And they just would insert something
about Israel in West Bank. Crazy stuff. And
that's always what happens is they're using this
as a a way to sneak by things
that you're not paying attention to or just
playing, but, you know, here, I'll give you
this, you give me
that. So if they had 12 separate bills,
well, yeah, maybe it wouldn't be 5,000 page
bills that nobody reads. That's by design.
What did what why do we always
spend at least as much as we did
last year, and why do we never cut
spending? It's because democrats
wanna grow the welfare state, and republicans wanna
grow the military industrial complex. It's also because
like any other business, if you wreck if
you demonstrate that you don't need it, well,
we're not gonna get as much, which is
not really what will happen, but the American
people may notice that. Well, every year, you're
asking for more money, but you don't you
don't even spend. You don't need as much.
Why can't we get some of that back?
So if they actually spend or really stress
the idea that we just don't have enough
every year, well, every year, you'll be able
to increase that, which means stealing more money
from the American people.
And we're we're eventually gonna get together,
and they're both gonna go up. I guarantee
it.
And both parties are just fine letting the
bureaucrats
do their thing, which should be our thing
according to article 1,
section 8 in the Constitution.
We are empowered with these things.
Most
important of the things we do is the
funding, and that's the big lever we have.
You know, I've sat through now almost 2
years of hearings in this Congress
where we've exposed lies at the CDC,
shortcuts at the FDA, unconstitutional
gun bans at the ATF
over prosecution of January 6ers at the DOJ,
targeting common citizens at the FBI, spying by
the NSA,
illegal mandates for livestock by the USDA,
targeting plant vaccine
or transgenic plant vaccine at the NSF,
and
censorship,
the censored industrial complex at the end of
which the NSF is part of, automobile kill
switch at the DOT. Now these are all
things, I think, most Democrats are just fine
with this kind of totalitarian state that the
bureaucrats are pushing on us. But Republicans
at least pretend to be against these things.
But what are we gonna do this September?
We're gonna fund every freaking one of those
things that we have exposed.
That is the tool that we have is
the funding.
Why are we funding things we don't like?
We don't have to. Oh, it's because we're
addicted to spending.
And this
Well, to be more specific about it, it's
because you're being
driven to.
There's not I mean, just addicted. This isn't
a shopaholics.
Maybe there's some level of that, but at
the end of the day, it's because there
are lobbyists driving action. There are lobbyists who
are paying, literally bribing, that's what this
is, individuals. And, you know, Israel and APAC
is the largest end entity within this to
take action
for for no other reason that they're getting
paid to do so.
I mean, you for there you go. Minor
addition, that is what lobbying is. They don't
have to pretend it's about long term lofty,
you know, like, we just we won't fund
them next year. We've seen from APAC where
they're literally in real time dictating funding based
on choices made in policy.
That's it it's that's why the FAR Act
exists, and nobody cares about that.
The bottom line, in my opinion, is that
these people are being driven to do so
by outside interests that are countering American interests.
I mean, how what else do you call
that? I mean, that these people are not
acting in your interests.
Doesn't do anything about the addiction
at all.
So,
why let me let me
touch on one point too here that I
think is important.
Is, you know, a couple years ago or
a summer and a half ago, I suppose
now, we did something where we
allowed the debt limit to be increased.
But as,
as a condition of that, we said if
you do a CR that lasts past April
30th,
everything's gonna get cut 1%.
And that, to me, seemed like at least
a little tinge of fiscal responsibility was creeping
in.
But now I noticed that this CR,
instead of going
1 year
and giving us time
to do the 12 appropriations
bills, is gonna go 6 months. Now let
me tell you what's gonna happen because this
goes 6 months. Number 1, it ends in
March 28th,
on March 28th.
Well, the automatic cuts happen on April 30th
if the CR went past that. So that
is exactly why the speaker chose a 6
month CR.
And so we don't
have even the chance,
a threat
to this to this town. It's a threat
of a 1% cut. We don't wanna even
this is like t ball. The 1% cut
is on
Which is what every American wants.
They know that. That's why they give you
a fan like a flimsy half thought through
illusion.
What he's saying is they made sure that
it was 6 instead of the the usual
because it allowed them to make sure they
would have to event they they're doing they're
they're manufacturing
the thing that they want under the guise
that they're doing what you want.
These people literally don't care about you. George
Carlin nailed
it. The t, and Republicans won't even swing
at it.
So instead,
we're gonna do a 6 month CR instead
of a 1 year CR. That sets up
this another crisis next spring where we can
do another pretend fight.
More riders, more other legislation based on that
idea doing happening the same thing, by the
way. So they get to use it twice
to insert new things.
Right? This is how this always works.
All of these things are usually, you know,
typically against your interest because they're that's why
these things are done quietly and around the
side.
Sometime around March.
And that fight'll it'll be the same fight
regardless of who wins the presidency and who's
in charge of the senate and the house,
and we're basically gonna get pretty much the
same result.
Two party illusion.
But that's 6 months from now.
In the meantime, we can kick the can
down the road. All of these things that
we've exposed and all of these hearings are
gonna continue to get funded.
So make sure you don't miss that part.
He's talking about all the things during the
COVID 19 illusion. The FDA, criminality, the CDC.
Yeah. But we'll we'll we'll just kick it.
We'll have another 6 months
of funding for these things hurting people because
you wanna be able to increase funding
even though it's been exposed. This is my
point about all the things I've said over
the past about the Clinton pay to play
stuff. These you know how many times we've
had evidence nailed to the wall
proving criminality where literally nothing happens because of
some bureaucratic nonsense like this?
They're always lying to you. Lock her up.
My come on. The idea is clear that
there were so many opportunities, so much evidence.
It's not gonna happen this time either.
But wait. There's a bright shiny object on
this CR. I've never seen one of these.
I have never seen a bright shiny object
attached to one of these must pass bills.
Oh, wait. No. It actually happens. There always
is. A bright shiny object. A bauble, if
you will.
A little little something to get excited about.
This SAVE act gonna save us all.
Right? Interesting.
And and by the way, this is good
political theater. I do like this part of
it, that we're gonna see almost every Democrat
cast a vote so that
illegals can vote in our elections.
I mean, that's pretty clever on the part
of our speaker to set that up. May
And, again, that is a problem. Right? It's
the law is there, and it's we're people
seem to be aware of the fact that
people who don't have citizenship couldn't potentially vote.
Anybody trying to make that happen is ridiculous.
That's not a political thing, a left right
thing. That's just simply the reality.
Nobody should be this is all that I
think is completely flimsy and based on the
idea that it sets up the Republicans to
say, see, they wanna elect do it's about
a narrative control concept. At the end of
the day, I don't think it's even legitimate
to say that every single immigrant, no matter
where they're from, will vote Democrat. That seems
pretty stupid to me. But that's where the
argument gets pushed forward. Either way, I think
it's about a a dichotomy as always,
distilling it down into one specific point where
you think they then they give them both
the ability to point at the other side.
If you all take that vote. But here's
what he's gonna do after you take that
vote.
He's gonna take it off. The bright shiny
object goes away. It's Lucy and the football
again.
And the American public is all revved up.
Yeah. We're gonna get to save it. We're
gonna save these elections.
We're gonna stop the illegals from voting.
Really? How are you gonna do that in,
like, 6 weeks? I think they're already
registered.
Yep. If they're gonna vote. Some of them
probably already voted.
And how in the world as an illegal
alien that you can register or immigrant? That
seems I mean, these are valid points. This
is not a partisan issue.
I mean, I mean, you could argue that
you think the law should change, and then
we can hear out your argument. But just
to simply say, it's like the second amendment
or anything else. You can't just be like,
I don't like it. That's wrong now because
I disagree. Well, the reality is the law
exists. And I'm the first one that will
tell you just because it's a law doesn't
mean it's legal. But the reality nonetheless is
that it is the case and you if
you're if you don't have citizenship, you're not
supposed to be able to vote. And the
idea that they're just trying to make that
the case, it's ridiculous. I mean, there's not
even a logic to it other than somehow
that they should have the rights that we
do. What's I it just it seems like
this lofty idea that's almost meant to be
dismissed.
Now this is my point about the 2
party illusion, Trump being the selection. I that's
my opinion and maybe I I'm seeing that
missing the forest for the trees. Consider that
as well.
This save act ain't gonna save anything.
And particularly, because it ain't ever gonna become
law.
It's a it's a false promise
to get all the Republicans half pregnant. I
disagree with that. I'm almost willing to bet
you anything that it does become law. But
either way, what he's saying is that they
are lying to Republicans anyway.
So it's just no matter how you spin
this, it seems like we're all being deceived.
And then you're gonna get fully pregnant by
the end of September
when you vote for this CR.
With the is not gonna have
this I mean, I hate to break this
to you.
I mean, the Democrats already know this. I'm
not telling you anything special. I hate to
break it to the Republicans.
You ain't getting the SAVE Act. It is
not gonna stay on this bill.
Why?
Because we're gonna cave.
We're gonna cave. Is it a fight worth
having? Absolutely. It's a fight worth having. Make
those Democrats say they want illegals to vote.
Make them take that vote as many times
as you can, and then make them go
to the ballot box in November.
But that's what it is. It's political theater,
folks. We all know where it ends up.
We've seen it. I've been here 12 years.
I've seen it 12 times.
I refuse to be a thespian
in this failure theater.
Now And with that, I yield back. In
case you missed the point at the end,
what he was kind of the conclusion is
that what he's saying is that ultimately,
even though they get them to say that
the Republicans will end up caving for whatever
the reason becomes about the necessity for this
to pass by a certain deadline,
and then that will no longer be there.
Even if it was, though, it still wouldn't
happen by the end of this election time.
So the the bottom line is it seems
pretty clear. Whatever angle you spin this at,
you're being played. And that's my point about
all of these people, left and right, all
of them. You know? So the what what
but the main point that I'm making
is that this is a true a a
digital ID Trojan horse. And we covered this
in July, the SAVE Act, Real ID, and
ID 2020, using the 2 party illusion in
the election to usher in digital IDs, which
I've said before overlaps with the mobile driver's
license point from Biden,
which is how it usually works. It's just
your government taking action from both sides, which
end up giving you one thing, and they
all get the point to each other. Because
on that point, it says in there that
these new mobile driver's license discussion will be
your one stop shop for your identifications,
not just driver's license. So once that happens
and they force that in, you'll no longer
be able to have a valid use of
these
paper versions. Because that's what it's point if
you read it, the point is this will
take place of those. It'll be that's what
you use. It'll be the official version that
will no longer accept the paper.
So once that happens, then that invalidates those
anywhere they might be used. And that takes
those options away from the SAVE Act. What
does that leave? Real ID compliant identification.
Otherwise known as digital identification.
It's very simple.
It's happening right in front of you. That's
why I'm convinced this will pass. I hope
I'm wrong.
Not in the case of what he's saying.
He's saying, you know, it'll eventually pass as
my point.
Now,
going into the debate,
more on the 2 party illusion.
As I said, and I I very much
mean this, it was meaningless.
Now, obviously, there was a lot of entertaining
ridiculousness to point out. Both of them were
lying. Both of them were you know? Like,
to be clear, it seems quite obvious that
Trump
got manipulated in a way based on the
way she I mean, she really did seem
to I I I'm always of the mind
that one of the main possibilities is that
it was all literally theater. So think about
that. But let's just, for sake of conversation,
pretend that, no, they weren't in the mind,
that they were all acting, this was something
they were doing. You know, even if they
both recognize they both support Israel and will
do the same things, but they wanted, like,
Clinton and Trump, whatever, despite having their dinners
and having friendship and saying they're good people,
when they're debating, they hate each other. Right?
So,
ultimately, Kamala very clearly did get him to
kind of react,
which is what they seem to say beforehand
being like, well, you know, he they're gonna
try to rattle him to get him to
react this way. It was like a public
conversation and yet here we are. And she
said that you were an embarrassment and the
lead world leaders think you're a joke and
you could see it on his face.
He was like it bothered him. Because I
think he's a very,
you know, kind of shallow in you know,
he it's hubris.
And I think that bothered him. And then
he then you see him spin out into
things where he's attacking personally and, you know,
all he had to do was focus relentlessly
on the fact that she has no policy.
That she that everything she's producing, it's it's
it was a,
it was a no brainer. It would have
been a a home run. But instead, he
went he he showed himself to be the
petty person that he ultimately is. Now inside
of Kamala, I I think she just exudes
this this this
same thing, petty, kind of, you know, childish
mentality, but also very, like, what's the word
I'm looking
for? That yeah. Smug.
Smug is what I think from her. Every
possible thing you see from her. That's why
you use that this stupid picture of her
with her hand and her chin. Like, it's
just this gross, smug, you know, I know
better even though I have no way to
I can't articulate it because I don't even
know how to.
But either way, I think it came away
as the same this is why I think
it's meaningless.
You could try to argue that Trump won
or she won. I mean, I think if
you wanted to try to lean it one
way or the other, it seemed that at
the very least, it seemed like Trump lost
more from it. I don't think either of
them won anything. I think that he would've
maybe lost more support than than they, you
know I think both of them lost support.
Let's put it that way. And I'll make
some comments on that going forward. But the
main point for me
is the idea that
they both lied
about everything. They're both presenting this and lying
about the other than the support for Israel,
mind you, which I'll play a clip of.
It was just gushing back and forth who's
more supporting of Israel. So if we know
they're by the way, we all know this.
They lie. Politicians lie about everything. They're always
projecting what they want you to think. So
when they get up and do their dance
about what we're gonna do,
I don't know why we pretend that means
anything. I'm I'm about principles and looking at
what they've done. Well, Trump has shown himself
to be somebody who doesn't follow through despite
the narrative they wanna push down your throat,
or COVID 19 lockstep,
or, you know,
warp speed and all the rest of it,
Kamala Harris says, clearly. This is why I
give less attention on those because she is
a ridiculous person. Her track record is absurd.
But does she pretend she is is shown
to be the opposite by what she's done
in her past. Or the fact that she
can't seem to lay out an articulate sentence,
I guess, outside of this debate. It's just
it's it's it's crazy that these people have
any attention at all.
But what it's a meaningless
more than that because we already saw that
everybody stood up and said, I'm gonna vote
this way already.
Bill Maher and and, and Quentin Tarantino, whatever
else, where the idea is that, I don't
care what they have to say. I'm voting
for her because he's a maniac. Or, I'm
voting for him because she's a communist.
That's the reality of our political situation. I
think anybody who's seeing something else has either
decided the vote doesn't translate or recognizes that
you're all being manipulated so they would choose
to abstain but they can't so they don't
go.
I think we're increasingly seeing a smaller conversation
of like 10% of the people involved who
actually are being they represent that as the
entire conversation.
That's the point as always. The largest grouping
of every election are people that do not
participate. And I think most of them are
people that would rather abstain if they had
that option. Because that that's my point. I
wanna
vote abstention. So and then it should be
tallied, it should be on the screen, they
don't do that. They've taken that from you.
But then, in the grouping that does vote
every year, every year, 40 plus percent are
people that register as independent.
That number grows every year. So every year,
this pretend conversation gets smaller and smaller and
they all go, that's the only thing. Choose
between the 2 people that are terrible.
When really they're the same thing driving you
in the same direction. That's exactly how it's
supposed to work. So the reality is we
can see that everybody made their minds up,
they were lying about everything, and all it
did was essentially show themselves to be petty
and small.
So it was meaningless.
I think so very very very clearly. But
obviously there were standout moments and, you know,
he's he said her thing back to her
and I'm talking now.
Oh. It's like it's it's just so silly.
Or she does the same thing about how
she's trying to act. Like, the point we'll
get into some points actually right now about
the animal stuff and the different points of
back and forth. But I wanna start with
this.
Harris lies in debate with Trump by claiming
no troops are deployed in combat zones. So
what I think this shows, and the fact
that it wasn't really pushed back on, is
that they're both trying. Like usual,
there's certain things that both
are trying to achieve.
And this is the case that we're talking
about the idea that we're ultimately, you know,
we're not in war. We're not dealing with
in the fact that just like with Trump's
situation, yes, he did initiate new things and
didn't end up becoming wars, but he clearly
tried to overthrow Venezuela. He clearly assassinated a
person, a a leader of Iran, either of
which could've spun out into major wars. He
continued to bomb every one of the other
countries and and Sudan, by the way. And
we don't talk about any of that. Then
try to pretend like nothing new happened. Or
try to act like we're not deployed anywhere.
They're both lying to you.
The point is it says, quote, as of
today, there is not one member of the
United States military who is in active duty
in combat zones, any in war zones in
the world. The first time in the century.
You know, despite all of the obvious combat
zones they're currently in. Not least of which
is Israel, which we know they're on the
ground. They've publicized this now.
How is that not the most obvious combat
zone in the world right now?
It's the antiwar.com,
a great platform, says US troops are, in
fact, deployed in Iraq, Syria, under the anti
ISIS coalition, and actively to participate in combat
operations. Now I guarantee when get when if
and when pushed, they'll simply say,
that's not considered a combat zone because they've
got some ridiculous definition of what they claim
a combat zone is. Certain number of people
and time frames and blah blah blah. No.
That's that's
doctor Fauci and gain a function. No. No.
No. It's now called EPPB. So you're lying.
No. You just changed the name. Okay? You're
all liars.
Bottom line is it's obvious the US government's
involved in wars all over the world. So
this is just a ridiculous point, and both
of them are misleading you about it. But
it says less than 2 weeks ago, 7
US troops were wounded in a raid against
suspected ISIS hideouts in Iraq.
US troops, it goes on to say, have
also been injured in recent weeks by drone
and rocket attacks in US bases in Iraq
and Syria, which significantly ramped up last year
in response to US support for Israel's genocide
in Gaza.
Back in January, 3 US Reserve Army soldiers
from Georgia were killed in a drone attack
on tower 22, a secretive US base in
Jordan on the Syrian border. Yeah. Nobody deployed
anywhere. Harris made the false claim while discussing
the US withdrawal from Afghanistan.
She said that she agreed with president Biden's
decision to pull out, even though technically that's
not the reality,
but also criticized Trump for negotiating the deal
that led to the withdraw. She says, quote,
he bypassed the Afghan government. He negotiated directly
with a terrorist organization called the Taliban.
Well, yeah. But so did you. And the
idea being that this is an entity they
have worked with since the beginning.
Remember the game is we're going after the
Taliban and then didn't do that. And they
ultimately then worked alongside them, but ultimately came
back to the point where Trump then said
we're having negotiations with the Taliban, which I
also criticized.
The idea is that you you base the
entire illegal war on the idea you were
going after them and now you're negotiating with
them. The point was it was never about
them. They're another entity they can use and
influence like the moderate rebels, whatever you wanna
call them.
So she's saying,
he's the one that went around the government.
By the way, it's an illegal government set
up with a bunch of warlords that is
not what they're like, they are always manipulating
you from both sides into one position.
We're supposed to pretend like we got out
of Afghanistan. No. You didn't. There's clear presence
there whether they are militia, whether they are,
shoot. I wanna say mercenaries is the point
in my mind, but it's, contractors.
That's how we pretend they're called when it's
US government people. Right? Otherwise, known as terrorists
anywhere else. But the point is that clearly
the US government has presence, and just like
anywhere else. And the bottom line is, they
did leave all that stuff. But I guarantee
you the same thing would happen with Trump.
Because the point was allowing them to pick
this up to continue the operation in Afghanistan.
But since Trump defended the the deal, calling
it a very good agreement, of course, because
he was involved, and criticized the way Biden
carried out the withdrawal.
It's just so funny. It says, these people
did the worst withdrawal and in my opinion,
this is what he said, the most embarrassing
moment in the history of our country.
Oh, really?
So not the USS Liberty,
not
Pearl Harbor, 9/9/11,
not the ongoing genocide you were no. But
this, that
withdraw
from a 20 year war, which should be
at least in some way a positive thing,
but left some stuff behind for bad guys.
Most embarrassing moment in our country. Why? Because
that's the that's one of the talking points.
Yeah. It was pretty stupid. But I think
it would happen either way. Most embarrassing moment?
I'm gee, I wonder why he's ignoring all
the Israel conversations we could have. But it
says, when the genocidal war in Gaza was
brought up,
Trump claimed Harris hates Israel, as we keep
showing you. And that the country wouldn't exist
if she were elected, which is just embarrassing.
I'll play the clip next. Because it's obvious.
They're gushing over who supports Israel more.
I I I think it's important to see
what I mean, ask yourself why that would
be his point. Okay. Think about this.
Even Republicans, by the way, most Americans do
not support what's going on in Israel.
Most of the world, the vast majority, are
aggressively speaking out about it. So ask yourself
why he feels the need to tell Americans,
who mostly don't support Israel, that she hates
Israel.
Do you know who he's talking to when
he says that? He's talking to Israel.
He's talking to the people in this country
who desperately support Israel. Because in his mind,
that's what matters.
Tell me show me prove prove me wrong.
I think that's really important to consider.
This is the most hated and obviously highlighted
genocide in real time that we've ever heard
of, ever seen.
Because it's it I mean, when's the last
time you saw like, in real time I
mean, the obvious reality is that people don't
want the Americans, even as I'll play a
clip from Kim Iverson, even Republicans are starting
to push back against what's going on. And
yet he still stands up and goes, you're
our worst, you hate Israel. He goes, no,
I like Israel more. Doesn't that seem crazy?
It should.
And it says what this is what I
think is hilarious. Typical Trump kind of way.
She goes, she hates Israel. If she's president,
I believe Israel will not exist within 2
years from now. Which is crazy because she's
promised support no matter what. Then it goes
on and says, and I've been pretty good
at predictions.
Well, I I guess. Not I mean, it's
not really. But it says, and I hope
I'm wrong about that one.
Because I guess what's interesting is because you
want Israel to exist, not because you don't
want it her to be wrong. It's funny,
but it goes, she hates Israel. Says it
again. 3rd time. Then says, at the same
time, this is Trump style,
in her own way, she hates Arab population
because the whole place is going to get
blown up. Arabs, Jewish people, Israel, Israel will
be gone.
Okay? You can just let it rest with
she hates Israel. But also Arabs and whatever
else, so she just hates everybody apparently. It's
like it's just it's lazy. It's lazy arguments.
If she hates Israel, why would she hate
it just doesn't make any sense. It's because
you get to pick. Right? You it's her
that's what he does. I'll throw it right
down the middle, and you can decide which
one you like. You want her to be
anti Israel? There you go. You want her
to be anti Palestinian? There you go.
Sad.
But he goes, Harris responded by, of course,
declaring her strong support for Israel. No. Her
gushing support for Israel. Harris also said the
debate that she would allow always, quote, give
Israel the ability to defend itself. Like, you
don't say that ridiculous,
ignorant statement today while they're committing genocide if
you don't blindly support the genocide.
And it goes meaning, US weapons shipments will
continue to flow if she becomes president, which
she has said explicitly.
Discussing the war in Ukraine, of course, Trump
said that he would try to end it
before he was sworn in. Same point.
What does that mean?
Well, he would people love to believe it
means that he'll stop it. He'll step in
and he'll sigh. You know? And the point
is depending on what side you're on, you
get to pretend that means that.
All he all he is saying is the
say that to me, that is lock her
up. That is end the Fed. That is
JFK docs. It is a statement that's meaningless
when it comes to pass. Whatever ultimately happens,
he'll say, I did that. And if it
the point is it's not about ending the
war. It's about continuing the same agenda. He
will support Ukraine.
Mark my words. He'll support Israel because these
things are central to Israel's objectives.
Now I no. And I mean, leave it
there. I was gonna add one more thing
to only confuse it, but leave it there.
The point is,
clearly,
to say he will end it will all
it's the same thing he said about Israel.
We'll end it. Right? It'll be done by
the time. And what does he mean by
that? We'll give them everything they need. That's
not the same thing people wanna hear from
that.
He said, how would he end it before
he's sworn in? What does that even mean?
He's just being hyperbolic because that's what he
is.
Quote, I want a war I want the
war to stop. K? Still doesn't make it
clear what he's talking about. I want to
save lives that are being uselessly,
he says, people being killed by the millions.
But it's the millions, he says. Oh, not
not Israel. You'll be forgiven for thinking he
cares about that genocide where millions are actually
being or rather millions are being potentially killed
or displaced.
In Ukraine, it is a high it is
a high casualty count. But the point is
it's interesting how one matters and one doesn't
him. But it goes, it's so much worse
than the numbers you're getting. The numbers are
fake numbers. Okay?
Either way, they're both going to support Ukraine
against Russia.
I hope I'm wrong. I really do. And
even then, I guess I'll say, the point
is if it ends up being the opposite,
I would simply think it's likely that that
interests what they're trying to accomplish. Because I
do think at this point, it has lost
its what they're trying to do seems to
have at least floundered.
But we'll wait and see. And we need
to engage with them objectively, and it's certainly
that this could be
a skew like,
whether this ends up being Ukraine as a
central role or not, I think is what's
the important point.
Israel?
I I would bet my life on it,
but I think you already know that. If
they're both competing for who supports them more,
neither of them are gonna step in and
stop what's happening, which is terrifying.
But it says Trump repeatedly blamed the invasion
of Ukraine on Biden being weak,
which, again, it's a lazy argument. What does
that have to do with anything?
Are you are you telling us you would've
gone in and defended Ukraine? So then how
does that mean that he'll stop it by
supporting
which arguably be supporting Russia? Because everyone frames
this as stopping the war supporting Russia.
The bottom line is this happened because the
US government made this happen
and other entities involved.
That's undeniable. And if you're disagreeing with that,
you're lying into the propaganda. I think the
evidence is shockingly obvious because they were literally
telling you it was gonna happen. You've got
Lindsey Graham telling you there in 2017, this
is your war is our war.
It's just and obvious neo Nazis, the Crimea
aspect, which was clear, the Donbas ethnic cleansing
for a decade.
Oh, weird. More ethnic cleansing. And remember, Israel
openly funded the Azov movement. In fact, they
both created it together.
But it says and and said that both
the invasion on October 7th,
Hamas attack on Israel wouldn't have happened if
he were president. You see my point? Who
can take that seriously?
What exactly would you have done, Trump, to
stop Hamas from doing what they did? What
exactly would you have done when nobody saw
that, at least arguably, saw that developing?
Somehow you being present would have scared them
away? That's probably actually what he's saying.
That's that is deserving of ridicule.
It's either completely lofty without meaning, which means
you should go, you're just trying to manipulate
me, or that he genuinely thinks that his
presence would have somehow warded off people fighting
for their self determination.
But he goes, Harris accused Trump of being
fond of dictators and took a very pro
NATO line.
Understand, it says, why the European allies and
your NATO allies are so thankful that you
are no longer president. And we understand the
importance of the greatest military alliance the world
has ever known, which is NATO.
Both of them, by the way, seem to
be openly supporting the idea of increasing NATO's
importance
despite the fact that Trump said something quite
different before. And his cabinet is very clear
on that. And it says, and what we
have done to preserve the ability of Zelensky
and the Ukrainians
to fight for their independence.
Right. The illegal coup government you put in
place is run by open neo Nazi elements.
But, yeah, independence.
But we'll ignore the obvious 75 year fight
for independence for the Palestinians, both of you.
But it says Harris claimed that if Trump
were still president,
Putin would be, quote, sitting in Kyiv right
now.
It's just such a silly game. I mean,
I'll get to a point later when the
one of these people we're gonna discuss is
you saying, Putin endorsed Kamalas.
Anybody with a brain or even, you know,
a, you know, integrity
would be like, come on. Maybe that's the
truth somewhere behind the scene, but what he
said publicly was so obviously a joke.
He said laughing. He literally said because Biden
called on everyone to support Kamala, then all
all of his allies to support Kamala, then
I guess I have to support Kamala. And
they all laughed about it. Like, you're really
gonna think he stands up and acknowledges that
he's an out he's an asset of Biden?
Like, you guys are either willfully deceiving because
you like the point because it'll trick people
into supporting Trump,
or you're too dumb to see it.
Now here are them battling off on who
supports Israel more. And as Anarba Tran wrote,
most telling part of the debate,
both argue on who loves Israel the most.
About Israel. All of a sudden, she hates
Israel. She wouldn't even meet with Netanyahu
when he went to congress to make a
very important speech. She refused to be there
because she was at a sorority party.
Now I don't even know if that's true
about the party, but probably for all I
know. But the point is,
I argue she did that because she was
hoping that that would give the indication to
her base who clearly does not support the
genocide
that she doesn't support them, even though she
does.
Very clearly as she says right now. But
do in doing that, I think it was
kind of the hoping that they would go,
oh, see? Say, just like they tried to
do with RFK Junior. Oh, he's just saying
that to get elected and she really will
end it once she gets in. Can't you
tell? Because she wouldn't even talk to him.
They all just hope you read into everything.
The truth is, they are all the same
thing in my opinion. 1st, she want to
go to the sorority party.
She hates Israel. If she's president, I believe
that Israel will not exist within 2 years
from now. And I've been pretty good at
predictions, and I hope I'm wrong about that
one. You know what? You know what's actually
interesting to me? That very well may be
the reality that is inevitable right now.
So what's funny is I bet you he's
hedging his bets right there. Where if she
gets in power,
it will end because it will probably within
the next I don't mean necessarily it will
be gone. But the reality of what the
Zionist controlled Israel is is clearly on the
decline. The world sees them. There's no taking
that back. And I'm not talking about all
Jews or even all Israelis, but specifically
the genocidal Zionist government that we all can
see at this point.
So that's a that's a pretty wise play
for me. If he ends up losing, he
can say, see, she destroyed Israel when in
reality it was already happening anyway. Interesting point
to think about.
She hates Israel. At the same time, in
her own way,
she hates the Arab population
because
the whole place is gonna get blown up.
Arabs,
Jewish people,
Israel Israel will be gone.
Now how exactly do you think that's gonna
happen, guys? Let's take a fun moment and
think logically. You know, deductive logic that Trump
doesn't like apparently.
Who has nukes over there? Not the Palestinians.
Pretty much I mean, there's only a very
few examples of, in regard to the Middle
East in general that you could even argue
might be able to. It's not Iran. That's
for sure. That even the US State Department
says that.
Israel does though, and they also have what's
called the Samson option, which by the way,
I don't even need to prove. Look at
it. Type it in. You look it up.
It's very provable. It is a very clear
point that they have in their policy that
should they know they're about to be lost,
that they will deploy a nuke.
That's an Israeli policy.
So, is he I mean, deductive logic would
argue that if nobody else there but them
have well, what he's saying is it will
be all destroyed.
So because, I guess, Israel launches a nuke.
And in any case, in many wild, fanatical,
prophetic Zionist minds, that's exactly what will end
up bringing on the end times. And they
call him the pro they call him the
chosen one. They call him the one bringing
on the end times. That's not my opinion.
Not the some of those. Some of the
more prophetic Zionist and rabbi overlap do.
I just think that's pretty terrifying, actually. I
didn't think of that before.
It would have never happened. Iran was broke
under Donald Trump. Of course, because Iran attacked
Israel. Right?
These people are ridiculous. I mean, if he
thinks that, he's a moron. But I don't
think he thinks that. I think he knows
it's not true, but that's what Israel wants
them to say. Now Iran has $300,000,000,000
because they took off all the sanctions that
I had. Jesus. Right. So in other words,
they have their own money that you kept
stealing from them.
I just I don't even know why anybody
doesn't recognize how silly these things are. Just
be the only thing that would ever make
that make sense is Iran bad guy because
they said. We can't let them have money
or weapons because bad.
You know, like every other country everywhere. It's
just so stupid. We need to start ridiculing
these kind of things. Rand had no money
for Hamas or Hezbollah or any of the
28 different,
spheres of terror, and they are Oh, yeah.
28. He just made that number up. The
point is that they're the things they point
at, these different groups, are not Iran controlled,
and they're all largely resistance movements risen up
against Israel and other occupiers, which have a
legal right to do. But what's funny is
state leading state sponsors, what he's trying to
kinda do right there,
Well, I thought ISIS was the leading entity
of terrorism we all talk about, and ISIS
just literally attacked Iran more than once since
October 7th. Why? Because they're assets of the
Israeli government and the US government. Guys, it
is a provable reality.
Undeniable. Ben Swan has a great documentary. James
Corbin has multiple document. It is the receipts
are clear.
So the bottom line is that they are
an entity that is being attacked by the
state sponsored terrorism. That's very clear. And I'm
not saying that means good guy. I don't
think any of these governments are acting in
people's interest by and large, is my opinion.
But realize
that when they do that, there's only one
reason that's happening. Because Israel has a vested
interest in making that the case.
Even the US in many ways has walked
these things back over the years, but here
are your 2 leading candidates,
both of which are screaming how Iran bad
guy and Israel war going forward.
Fears of terror, horrible terror. They had no
money. It was a big story, and you
know it. You covered it very well, actually.
They had no money for terror. They were
broke.
Now they're a rich For terror because the
terrors
I just guys, I just can't even listen
to this. Like, it's like a car like,
tear what's what terror? You mean crimes? You
mean violence?
They're they're spreading terror around the world. I
mean, these are buzzwords that mean nothing.
What exactly, Trump? You show it to me.
You mean the destruction of countries everywhere? Oh,
no. Sorry. That was the US government. You
mean the ongoing genocide? Oh, that's Israel. You
mean every other example of war and destabilization
and theft and and we're talking about these
people.
Again, Iran has very clear things that we
could highlight from internal country dynamics that you
could criticize.
You wanna point out to me anything other
than Hezbollah, Houthis, or on Saral movement, and
Hamas. By the way, Hamas that is funded
by Israel, that cat's out of the bag,
so there goes one of those stories. You
show me how those things represent anything other
than a resistance movement within these countries. Now
that's not they're not free of crime either.
But you can clearly show that they are
not Iran created. Now I can make the
argument that they're now, especially today,
working a lot working to push back against
these entities because they're all being attacked by
it. And that may mean weapons. But I
don't know why suddenly working with allies and
helping weapons exchanging weapons is a a major
thing. It's only because they say bad guy.
If you recognize what the US government's done
around the world and is still doing right
as I'm speaking,
there's no better example of a terrorist in
the world. Or Israel for that matter. But
weird how that's weapon sales, but over here
it's terrorism.
At least let's just at least try to
be, you know, consistent with our logic here.
Nation. And now what they're doing is they're
spreading that money around.
Look at what's happening with the Houthis and
Yemen. Look at what's going on in the
You you mean the Ansarole movement that is
literally the only thing pushing back against Israel's
weapon sales, which has had a very huge
effect? Their blockade has basically put that country
into like, they're they're struggling economically
everywhere.
One of the reasons is the Yemen blockade,
and these are it's obvious what's going on
there. Realize the US government and with Saudi
Arabia occupied Yemen to put their puppet back
in place. They have yet to succeed. And
in doing so, for a decade plus, they
have been blocking the Hudaydah port. They have
been starving people to death, you know, just
like Israel's doing in Palestine right now, using
a blockade.
And guess what?
The biggest pocket of ISIS territory within Yemen
has been snug right in the middle of
Saudi Arabia's territory they control, and it's only
gotten bigger since this started.
All this is very easy to prove. But,
yep, puns are on Sorolla, biggest terrorist group
because they're fighting the terrorism that we support.
And I'm speaking as I would be, you
know, Trump or US government. Middle East. This
would have never happened. I will get that
settled and fast, and I'll get the war
with Ukraine and Russia ended. Yeah. We'll get
done fast. We'll end that. Great policy.
How much wanna bet that doesn't actually happen?
If I'm president-elect,
I'll get it done before even becoming
president. Vice president Harris, he says you hate
Israel.
Oh, that's absolutely not true. I have, my
entire career and life, supported Israel and the
Israeli people. He knows that he's trying to
again divide
and and distract from the reality, which I
mean, again, so think about saying this at
a time when the genocide is on the
surface of the conversation, and she knows her
entire party by and large
knows that.
And here she is going, nope. I support
them no matter what. They can defend themselves.
These people are both genocidal criminals.
Which is it is very well known
that Donald Trump is weak and wrong on
national security and foreign policy. It is I
genuinely think those things bother him. I could
be wrong, but I think it's his hubris.
And I think that's what got him off
on his back foot during this debate. Well
known that he admires
dictators.
Which is I think they all do. It's
a silly claim.
And really, here's what's funny about that. The
reason they say that is because he tried
to talk with Putin or had meetings with
Kim Jong un. That's what diplomacy is, guys.
That's not why he's a dictating loving criminal.
It's because they're both are because they're supporting
people like Netanyahu
or people like Musham Mohammed
bin Salman. That's right. Or whoever is in
charge in Saudi Arabia. That's why they're both
loving dictator they both love dictators. But it's
funny how they try to point to the
one thing that actually the diplomacy
that's why he loves dictators and he told
you he'd be a dictator. No, he didn't.
You know, it's just it's just so I
I do I think they're both disgusting criminals,
but the but I can still be objective
and honest about whether he said something or
not. Like, great people on both sides, this
ridiculous lie they keep shoving out, which I
think is almost designed to cover the reality
that Charlottesville itself was the rise above movement,
which is the US arm of the Azov
movement from Ukraine, and they both fund that
entity.
So I think it's in all these narratives
pointing back and forth using fake things to
hide the real, the the truth right beneath
it, as usual. Wants to be a dictator
on day 1 according to himself.
I support Israel. No. I support Israel.
Well, here's another interesting thing from the debate.
There's a couple of things I wanna point
out before we get to the animals being
eaten point.
Ryan points this out.
This is wild, he says. Is this real?
Now, I'm this has been floating around where
somebody found these earrings
that do look pretty close to what she
was wearing. They're apparently and this is a
real thing. They're apparently, like, you can communicate,
make a list of music.
Now, this image, I like, I want you
to look at this versus the other one.
The point is that this the way this
earring looks looks different in the other picture.
I just let's be clear. It's very common
right now for people in the paradigm to
just blatantly make things up, lie, alter images,
and just be a lie for your truth
as I put it. Well, what's interesting is
here's there's another image. Here's the video. We
gotta play it, but the point is that
these these are real. There are at least
little elegant smart earrings. Where does it say
it?
Accessorizing the go, connect without disconnecting.
Directional sound from pearl to the ear. Right?
You can just clearly see this could be
used for audio. Right? So people could speak
into your ear, and and apparently you could
hear. It was just kinda crazy if it's
on your earlobe.
Here is the post from Twitter, which has
already got a community notes on it. It
says rumors are circulating that Kamala Harris was
wearing audio earrings and being fed lines. Now
I don't know the point is that I
can't see anything other than this image, and
that somebody found something that looks like that
image, which is which is a valid thing
to consider. Certainly could be. I think all
of them probably do it, to be honest.
All of them have body double. These aren't
fake things. These are very real things that
have gone far back in history. Body doubles
for any number of reasons. Like these are
but whether they are the things they're pointing
at every time they make those allegations with
no evidence is up for you to decide.
My point is that far too many people
make things like this and claim things like
this without truly being able to prove it.
That's what we'll get into when we get
to the animal point. It's very subjective. It
could be. But at the end of the
day, there's some ev like, for example, the
fact that that earring looks like the other
one, that's an evidence point. Evidence is not
proof. Evidence can be falsified. Evidence can be
wrong. The point is that it is still
evidence.
This point says rumors are unfounded. It says
Harris wore earrings by Tiffany and Co. Well,
I imagine because that's what she said.
And it's worn many times before. It says
hair and it says not the Nova h
one audio earrings. But here's what's interesting. This
looks very different right there, doesn't it? Almost
kind of clear as opposed to being dark
white, whereas these look more white. I wonder
if somebody altered the other one. But in
any case, I think it's something to consider.
I I wouldn't be surprised if any of
all of them are being fed lines for
whoever their string pullers actually are.
Now here I just wanna include that by
the way, because I think it's interesting. I
don't know why we would dismiss the possibility
that any of them would be doing that.
Right?
But at the point, as far as I
can tell, it's up in the air. It's
an image that looks like those, and that's
as most I've seen out there. If you
got more, let me see it.
That's where we should leave it though. That's
how this needs to continue to go forward.
We need to be more like, we're irritatingly
objective. Right? We need to be that way
today because of how dangerous this is getting.
By design. To mire you in a position
where nothing is able if we can't prove
anything, then that's where we leave it.
Now here is an important clip that I
think changes the conversation. Now there's a little
bit of crude and and some cussing in
here, so just be care make sure if
your kids are watching, ear muffs here. But
this is the most important clip from the
debate.
My plan is to build a wall. No
taxes on tips. Increase the child tax credit
and cut the cost of insulin. I believe
this will make America great again. I should
just give you a MAGA hat since all
you know how to do is copy me.
You're a racist. You tried to end democracy
with the worst event in the history of
the universe. You want to end the constitution.
You called veterans suckers and losers. You want
to be a dictator with project to 2025,
and you won't let us kill babies. You
let millions of illegals into the country and
they're eating pats? Oh, no. No. That's not
true. Shut up, bitch. I'm speaking. Does that
sound familiar? They're eating fluffy. Believe me, you
are fake news. Also, my crowd sizes are
huge.
Vote for me if you want to fix
all the problems we have now that I
haven't fixed, because the former president called some
people and told them not to let me
fix stuff. The only reason I came here
tonight was to let you make an ass
out of your lying self, and you didn't
disappoint. Tell Tim to stay away from my
horse.
So yes. Obviously, that's not real. What's what's
funny to me though is that it's you
know, one is just that, you know, you
could tell if you look close enough. But
at first glance, it's pretty good. It's an
AI, obviously, or rather just a edit, you
know, of the mouths, I think, is really
what it was. But it's it's crazy to
me how it was. What's funny more than
the fact that it's,
you know, if somebody had like, my point
is this could be done on a map
today. The government could do things that you
will never be able to tell. But what's
funny to me is if you actually watch
and listen, that did a pretty good job
of summing up how dumb it all was.
Like, those points are back and forth. That's
pretty much what the back and forth was,
but summed down to, like, a really dumb
pretty much what the actual content was. I
find that hilarious.
Now,
again, it meets the point of how this
is really just about narrative and talking points
and fake things back and forth. Right? Again,
in case you missed it, that was not
actually the debate. That was something that somebody
made. But I find it funny to think
about how
you could've just watched that and you probably
would've gotten the gist of what the debate
really was.
Now it says, in case you missed tonight's
debate, I broke the entire thing down in
under a minute. It's just funny.
Now,
here that Mac Blumenthal said now, of course,
this will be unpopular for some because he
argues that Trump won, but he his Trump
supporters are deluding themselves that they think he
won the debate, or rather that he lost.
Trump fell for the bait Kamala's handlers set
for him at every possible point.
Spent much of the debate on a defense,
stammering, spewed references to only extremely online to
reference only that that only extremely online members
of his base would recognize and got clobbered
in on abortion.
When Kamal was taunted she when Kamal taunted
Trump about the size of his rallies, he
stumbled cluelessly into her trap. And that's the
point I think is actually I think that's
what happened. Honestly, that or maybe that was
by design. But either way, that these statements
about him and how he's embarrassing and he's
a disgrace, like, I think it did kind
of get him upset.
My opinion. But I said if Trump had
entered the debate with an actual strategy, he
would've had responded at that after Kamala's massive
elaborately staged campaign launch in in Oakland in
2020, she failed to win a single delegate.
Wasted tens of millions of don't you see
the point? Like, these are very important points
that didn't even get touched on.
Wasted tens of millions of donor money and
was only installed as a dem nominee by
the media and party elites, which by the
way is not different than the reality quite
frankly. It's just been shown to you bluntly.
Let's not forget the DNC and Abby Wasserman
Schultz, and who by the way is still
in a position of power even though they
blatantly told you we we don't care what
you think. We we we can we'll consider
it, but we'll ultimately do what we want.
Cigars in back rooms and all of that.
That's a very real thing. So I I
find it funny that this is always a
coup, which if we're gonna make that point,
then it should be going back 50 years.
Right? Every single one of them. Because that's
what keeps happening. The primaries are an illusion.
They don't really care what you think and
they ultimately just choose what they want. Just
like happened again, they just did it right
on the surface this time. Doesn't mean it's
okay, but it's funny how we parse these
things.
Now it says that critique only came in
latter half of the debate when it was
too late, and most viewers' perceptions had solidified,
which I think that was the case before
it started. Similarly, when Kamala cited Goldman Sachs
and and Wharton to tout her economic credentials,
Trump had an easy opportunity to hammer home
Goldman's role
in the foreclosures crisis that destroyed the lives
of millions of hardworking Americans. The exact opposite
of what she's fighting for, if any of
us. Instead,
he grumbled that he graduated from Wharton before
veering off track again. When Kamala predictably raised
Trump's call for executing the Central Park 5,
he could have reminded voters of how she
boasted of geeling massive numbers of black youth
for truancy and marijuana possession. On foreign policy,
Trump should have honed in on Dick Cheney's
endorsement of Kamala for a redo
of, a redux of his demolish demolition of
Jeb Bush in 2016 prime primary debates.
He had 2 hours to put forward a
critique of a candidate who was was not
well known to most swing voters, to paint
her as a media created phony and reckless
warmonger after her own record, and he failed.
As well as the fact that, again, her
own policy seems to be very apt I
mean, again, I kinda think that's always what
it is, but she seems to be a
little bit more in that direction where there's
not much content,
substance to what she's saying. But, again, Trump,
I think, is the same thing, but at
least it's presented a little better. But he
could've gone after that because that is a
growing thought process.
Trump supporters are correct that the moderators, which
I agree with, David Murr and and Christian
Welker, orchestrated the debate in Kamal's favor. Never
fact checked her checking her and feeding her
one alley loop one, one alley oop after
another. Oh, I think is that how you
spell it? I guess it is, alley
oop. While relentlessly concerning Trump
cornering Trump. And the point is, clearly, they
did go after him and claim but I'm
gonna make a point about one of the
big ones that I do believe is actually
not real, quite frankly, but you could decide
for yourselves. But the point is that's one-sided.
Now you could break you could boil that
down to
a coordinated effort to help her win, which
is just as likely as anything else or
rather just the way they want us to
see this, drive you in support of Trump,
I would argue. But or it could just
be that these moderators who do have their
own opinions, and I argue are not as
informed and in the no's we like to
pretend,
just have that opinion. They just align with
Kamala's points and go after Trump because they
think he's wrong. Either way you look at
it, it's unfair, at the very least. And
it says, Murr and Welker clearly saw saw
the Beltway press corps disappointment with Dana Bush
and Jake Tapper for failing to ruthlessly fact
check Trump in the first debate and seize
the chance to burnish their status. Exactly. Right?
And he could it could be as simple
as that.
In the past, Trump would have recognized the
moderator as the second opponent and blasted the
fake news media for a shameless bias. He
should've. But the Trump of 2016,
whose campaign was propelled by a popular sense
of anti establishment betrayal after the Iraq war
and financial crash, is a ghost.
If he somehow makes it into the Oval
Office after this performance, which I genuinely think
is what's gonna happen, he will be focused
on personal survival, with his agenda hijacked and
subverted by the forces he once thundered against.
It's a good point.
Assuming you think that the vote translates and
that will happen, at the end of the
day, the idea that he is anything anti
establishment is completely the opposite. I mean, he
is the establishment by definition at this point.
He was president. And he has clearly shown
himself to be the same businessman focused per
business focused person that he was. Big business.
Not small guy, small it's it's opposite of
what he's always been.
But at the very least, he had that
that narrative going for him in the beginning.
I'm the outsider. But clearly, they're not even
trying that anymore.
And I think the best point was made
all day was Sal Agger's thing. Bread and
circuses for the fluoride drinkers.
And it says, Trump won the debate. Come
on. All the debate. And then it says
over here, why has the median income of
to to cost of housing ratio increased so
much in the last 50 years? Right? It's
just like, you know, look, we're over here
screaming each other and, you know, all these
very the point is that nobody his point
is that it always continues no matter whether
you got Coke or Pepsi.
And it's it's obvious.
Facts you could argue that just happens to
be aligned with, you know, that it doesn't
mean that they're the same thing but at
least you should can be considering that, seeing
as how the all of the data points
in that direction.
Now let's talk about this eating animals discussion.
So I do think this is important.
Only because of the way this has kind
of overwhelmed the conversation, which is usually how
this stuff works. But it comes down to
2 to 3 main things really. That this,
as far as I can tell, at this
point, is based on
flimsy assumption at best,
which is still evidence, mind you. One of
which is a a a a video of
a person in a town hall who is
stating this, which we don't know who he
is, we don't know whether it's real, he
could be lying, he could be wrong, or
it could be accurate. Then you've got a
video that Kevin Serbo is suggesting
is the evidence he's saying doesn't exist. Now
let's be clear, both of them constitute evidence,
so he's right in that point.
As I said before, evidence can be wrong,
like this, or falsified.
Evidence is not proof. So as the guy
stands up and says there's no evidence to
back it up, that is actually incorrect. But
what Kevin Sorbel's trying to argue is this
video, which is not of a Haitian
immigrant, but actually somebody from Ohio,
and the and whether they even ate anything
was simply put forward by the person filming,
and there's no evidence to back that up,
does not amount to what they're claiming it
does.
Now this is just another fact check on
Twitter. It says, this is a this this
is the case before this was posted.
The woman is in the videos is not
an immigrant. She's born in Ohio. Additionally, this
video was shot in Canton, which is a
170 miles away from Springfield.
Yet, here's Kevin Sorbo and the rest of
them, because you can click look at look
on Twitter on Republican side, they're all pointing
this as in Springfield, Haitian, and we knew
it.
Why? Because they're subjectively
assuming
or being led by the nose by the
people that they've blindly chosen to listen to,
a la Twitter files, which was the point
they made here.
You just got a Twitter file. The point
I'm making, if you don't remember, is that
I think Twitter files, as I said earlier,
is about trying to re
to engineer it to cr push you in
a position where you change the way you
engage with information.
You got screenshots.
The promise of source material, which by the
way, has still yet to ever develop,
despite everybody it was believing in them going
you're alive, they'll put it out. No, they
never did.
So all it did was kind of solidify
your mind that it's okay to just kinda
accept what you're being presented with without proving
it because, you know, well, they're on my
side.
That's dangerous.
Same thing here. This is swinging around and
everyone's using even though it's not actually the
case. Still, by the way, doesn't mean that
it didn't happen.
But the evidence that the proof does not
seem to be there right now.
Casey Wright made this point.
Basically, showing how he figured out how this
happened. Basically, a video of a city council
meeting in Springfield.
It features a fair a a guy complaining
about Haitians killing ducks. That's the and he
that's who who knows if he's accurate? Who
knows if he's making it up? I mean,
who knows? Or he's or he's telling the
truth. The point is nobody knows, because it's
one guy saying something in the in in
a in a you know, even if he
truly believes it, it could still be false.
That's this is the point about evidence improved.
When he says the other video is a
totally unrelated video which we just showed you.
Now I'm gonna play both of them for
you.
Here is the first one, and this is
seemingly where it started.
Because it's the people that's bringing them down
here because wherever they're at, that's what they're
used to, bro. Oh, and by the way,
I should say that there is clearly an
I've seen these overlapping points about bringing in
immigrants, Haitians in this location or others, you
know, which I think this is something I
mean, I don't know why in any world
the people of this community wouldn't be able
to have a say in whether that happens
or not. It's not about I mean, it
definitely could be overlapped with racism more entirely.
But the point is that there's other dynamics
to consider.
Whether or not you dislike them because of
the skin color or not, influx of people,
especially from another location, unfamiliar with the location
and the different
customs and traditions or whatever, will cause chaos.
Case or at the very least, destabilization. It
will cause an overburden on systems. I mean,
this is basic reality.
Well, that has to be considered. That can't
be racist till we point out the fact
that that should matter. And if you care
more about your,
you know if look, bottom line, if you'd
rather deal with your interpersonal situation and what
you get from the system and your what
your children need, then then show charity for
these people, which is not even meant to
be a slight. That's comp I mean, your
family has to come first. It's not something
we should be criticizing. My point in saying
all of that is that this is there
is a real problem here that is being
manipulated, taken advantage of, however you wanna look
at it. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't
be considering helping people that may be in
need. But I've always argued that comes down
to a personal choice, never government telling you
you have to. So all that being said,
whether or not these people were doing this,
whether or not they were the Haitian immigrants,
like we just got manipulated about this woman,
I'll show you next, or whether he just
made it out and we don't know. And
neither do the rest of them. Neither does
Trump who said this on the debate
because apparently Laura Loomer told him that. We'll
come to that next. They're in the park,
grabbing up ducks
by they neck, and cutting their head off
and walking off with them. And and eating
them like Okay. So how does he know
that?
Think about that. So he said they cut
their heads off and walking away.
Did you follow them home? Did you go
in their kitchens? Are they sitting down in
the park with a fire? I mean, I
certainly, questions to ask.
But it kinda feels like that part was
his opinion.
Right?
This is why things this is why when
we're using subjective, important information,
this is how things get out of control.
That's important. Even if it turns out to
be true, still a valid point to make
that when they're doing this, when they're saying
they still don't know, they're saying it because
it's a political point that works for them.
Even if it ends up being true right
now, they didn't know for sure. And that
has to matter to us. And I I
I argue by the evidence. It does not
seem to be the case.
Y'all get the highway state patrol down here
every week, and then y'all get, like, a
task force for the highway state patrol. And
they look for guns, and they look for
dope, and this and that in the 4th.
That same people that y'all got riding up
and down Limestone doing U turns pulling people
over for blinkers and pulling people over for,
like, going left to center in, like, a
couple miles over. Like, y'all can take them
same people, the highway state patrol, and you
can take them in every single one of
their silver charges and Dodge Durangos, and y'all
can take them to, sunset.
I mean, is that wrong? Right? I mean,
I'm the first one that will tell you
that the ridiculous tickets and traffic I mean,
non violent crimes don't care, quite frankly. We
had a whole conversation about that.
They could very well take all these people
that are simply just racking up revenue for
the system and actually have them stop the
rapists and murderers, all the rape kits they
should deal with, or immigrants if so, killing
ducks in the park or maybe eating them.
He's right.
Y'all can park them right over there, and
y'all can teach people how to drive since
the highway state patrol know so much how
to know so much about traffic laws and
know what to do in traffic. They need
to y'all pay them. They can go over
there. It's you get the point. He just
kinda goes, I I agree with him though.
It's a fair point to make that there's
an issue here. If that is case, if
he's accurate or and you know, the same
point's already made. Big ifs though.
Oh, and then here's the other one. This
is the one that is you the one
that's largely used. This came after this one,
and I think that's how these got connected.
And this is how this works. The person
in this video is the one asking if
did she eat it? Did she eat it?
Why do you think that was in his
mind?
The assumption then gets out of control.
Oh, she's black, so she's a Haitian immigrant.
No. That and this is the same thing
we keep seeing everywhere. People sharing videos of
just anybody with a different color of skin
doing anything to a person with white skin.
And the narrative becomes, they're taking over until
you find out that that's not any the
the person, just because they have a Palestinian
flag is not from Palestine. They live in
London. You know, it's it's just they're lies
everywhere.
And it's like we said with with Melville's
point.
We have to we have to literally question
everything all the time. It's how this needs
to work.
What did you do?
Why'd you kill the cat?
Smile for me.
Smile. And look, there's no blood on her
face, by the way, guys. Because if you
saw the beginning picture, she's kneeling over the
dead cat on the ground.
So there's nothing on her face. So by
logic, it doesn't seem that she was eating
it, but who knows?
Go like this.
Did you eat that cat?
Did you eat it?
No. Why'd you kill it?
No. I said no.
Why'd you kill it? So even in the
video itself,
the response is no. And they go, oh,
wow. She's lying. You know? It just it
doesn't matter what. Just assuming into the direction
of what you want the case to be.
Guys, this is irresponsible.
It's subjective, and it is everything the 2
party illusion on both sides represents.
Did you guys see all this? No. We
pulled up, and she was just laying there
with me. Did you see her eating it?
Eating it. She was eating it? Yeah. She
was. You can call the humane society to
see if they'll come pick those cat up.
It's deceased.
That's all you got.
Right? So my point is, it certainly could
be the case. She said no. He responded
to that. They asked other people who simply
saw her leaning over this, doesn't have any
thought anything on her face, but maybe they
wiped it off. I mean, the point is
we don't know, and that's the right response.
Just because people who you don't get to
see, who for all we know were added
audio after the fact I mean, I'm not
I don't I don't think that's the case,
but my point is that neither do they.
They heard it. They liked it. They went
with it. Just like Alex Jones and the
Trump getting the shot in the ear or
Luke Kradowski sharing it going, oh my god.
Look at his ear. One of the most
obvious and insultingly obvious fakes I've ever seen
in my life. Reversed image with a fake
ear thing, and they all fell for it.
Why? Because it works for the moment.
Now, again, to make it clear, for all
we know, this could end up being the
case. And I and I'll say, okay. There
we go. Now we know for sure. But
right now, neither do they. And yet, it
is everywhere.
And in fact, it's being used by the
other side to make Trump look stupid.
Maybe that was by design.
I'm just so I'm so tired of how
obvious this is. And I don't think it's
the majority, so it's time for people that
are not or seeing it, whether you're on
the left or the right, stand up and
call them out. If you want your party
to be better and you want people to
believe in it, call these people out for
what they're doing.
Now here is an article from, BBC from
6 hours ago.
Ohio leaders dismissed the claims of migrants eating
pets. Now, of course, my point in the
first time I said this was, well, okay.
That's I I talked it on a show
I think.
Obviously, they would wanna lie about that. I
don't have people who would wanna go, yeah.
We've got this happening in our state. That's
a fair point. So Trump kind of insinuated
or basically said in the in the debate.
Well, I wouldn't wanna say it. Well, that's
you to say to it's it's the kind
of thing like it's q n on stuff
is really what it is. Whether you're left
or right or whatever. To simply say that
the absence of it is proof that I'm
right. Right? Well, they didn't say that because
we know they wouldn't want to. Well, that
doesn't then prove that it is the case.
That's just a logical point than why they
might not want to if we end up
finding out that it is real. But this
is how people's minds are working right now.
The Twitter file stuff is everywhere. And I
just use that as kind of a point
to remember that we're being manipulated.
So but here's what's interesting.
Both the as we play the clip that
we play in the air, the rather the,
community person that they referenced in the in
the debate, and that is the case, said
it didn't happen.
But they they're more locals, so I think
they have even more of a reason to
just push back on it. But guess who
stood up and said it's not true?
Republican Mike DeWine. But I'm I'm sure they
have their opinions about how he's a a
rhino or whatever, but then that still does
not therefore make it the truth because he
said otherwise.
That's the whole game of, well, he said
no. Therefore, it must be true. That's a
very simple minded way to look at the
world. Can be the case, but often is
not today.
Either way, it's a Republican telling you that's
not the case. At what point do we
stand back and go, okay.
There's a very few things that seem to
potentially suggest that it might be there and
literally everything else is showing you that it's
not. People that are on the I mean,
I just went over it. At that point,
you need to recognize that the evidence does
not back it up. And at best,
leave it there until you can prove it
until and the answer is, well, we don't
know. But that's not what's happening.
Now now here Ben Swann put out a
video about this. Now in in his credit,
he does essentially end with the point of
being like, well, we don't know and journalists
have to ask all these questions. But I'm
a little bit disappointed by this video only
because he starts off by essentially going, it
is true and here's the evidence, and then
sort of walking it back at the end.
You can watch for yourself. On my point
is exactly what I just said. And he
doesn't add anything new to the conversation, shows
those 2 clips, but the idea that they
said it does not therefore make it the
case. It just doesn't. It's, it's evidence in
that direction. But based on where this is
going and what's happening, I'm very doubtful that
this is exactly what's happening.
Trump says immigrants are eating cats and dogs
and ducks in Ohio. In Springfield,
they're eating the dogs, the people that came
in. They're eating the cats. They're eating
they're eating the pets
of the people that live there. And you
know what? Whether or not it's a true
story, the way he did that made him
look really stupid.
I mean, it really did. I mean, it
just it whether or not it's the truth,
the way he presented that with really nothing,
which kinda just show you, which we'll get
into, that he was just in a moment
where he felt like he was on the
defensive and he just la he just went
to something that was in his mind and
that's Laura Loomer. I'm gonna show you that.
Apparently he flew with her, his entire cabinet
seems to be going get her the hell
away from us. I'm gonna read it to
you right from the article. The point though
is that she apparently is the one that
put this in his ear. I mean and
that's ex you guys know my opinion. That's
exactly right that's exactly right there. Because these
people are ridiculous.
David Muir of ABC said that the city
manager of Springfield, Ohio says there's no evidence
of this. But there actually are multiple reports
that this is happening, including from this man
who says he witnessed it in Springfield.
There Again, so that's right there. 100% agree.
Evidence. So he's wrong to say there's no
evidence because these things are evidence, not proof
though. In the park,
grabbing up ducks
by their neck and cutting their head off
and walking off with them and and eating
them like There's also 911 calls reporting groups
of men capturing and taking away entire flocks
of geese.
And I saw that. I'm like, yeah. This
has gotta be reported. So how how many
geese did they have?
They each had one. But they've been Okay.
So right there is a new point of
evidence. What's important, though, is to recognize is
simply reporting on the same story.
Right? So you have a call about saying
people taking ducks. Well, we already know that
because the guy was saying this. It again,
no. That at least it's being stated in
front of the community that they took these
ducks, cut their heads off. So, again, that's
the same report.
At the very least, none of them ultimately
prove that these things are being taken and
eaten. Or very at the very least, let's
be clear about the fact that people in
all of these conversations, whether it's Israel, Palestine,
whether it's a 2 party illusion, whether it's
anything we're talking about, We have seen a
rise in people who are willing to stand
up and just lie
for what they want the narrative to be.
We've seen this 3 days where God's thing
just on constant display. But it is a
2 party illusion thing as well. So just
consider that. Pears says there's no evidence. He's
not saying that they haven't found evidence because
ABC News sent a crew to Springfield to
find out. Instead, he says no official has
publicly agreed with that statement. As journalists, we
should take the step of investigating first
rather than deciding that until an official agrees,
it's not happening.
Yeah. And I agree with that. But I
guess I guess my only pushback on that
was just simply that it kinda starts out
to suggest that it's real.
But I guess that's just the way I
interpret it. The bottom line is that this
is something that is not backed up by
proof.
It is it is sub I put data
points to suggest that ducks are being taken,
which is the best we can prove or
at the very least being killed.
Which, again, I'm not gonna say obviously, if
you're gonna be logically go, okay. That seems
like that leads in the case of people
taking them to possibly eat them or whatever
else, then we should look into that. Now
if if you're angry that I'm being objective
about this and simply highlighting that nobody has
yet proven that anything's being eaten, then that
you have to realize that that is your
failure.
We have to care about that. I've said
14 times that it obviously could be that's
what's happening. But we all need to acknowledge
that nobody seems to have proven that yet.
And yet, it is a forceful point being
shoved in the conversation by everybody.
Doesn't that seem a little crazy to you?
That we're at a point now where out
of everything going on and all the important
conversations we're having and whether there's genocide,
this becomes a focal point. And all we're
doing is debating on something that nobody can
prove.
To me, that seems by design.
You can decide for yourselves. Now here's what
I find hilarious.
This is from
September 12th, so this has come out today.
Republicans point finger at Laura Loomer for Trump's
pet eating rant.
Now I'm not gonna I'm gonna do my
best to avoid going into my absolute disdain
for this monster of a human that is
absolutely
jovial about the genocide and continuing to say
the worst. I mean, what's funny about this,
we'll get into it, even republicans are calling
her racist, calling her, you know, whatever. She
is, in my opinion, an objectively,
dishonest person. Let's put it that way. Don't
make it too much.
I mean that. She's lying to you about
things all over the place. Or even just
how about we can highlight the fact that
she basically co opted a story that someone
like Alice Rubinstein has been talking about for
a very long time, myself included far less
than him, but has been talking about for
a long time. Around the Azov movement, around
the Ukraine conversation, about the rise above movement,
about Charlottesville.
And, of course, right before October 7th, which
needs to tell you something,
seems she jumped into that story, took over
the story, and said everything except
one of the most important parts, that Israel
was behind creating them along with the US
government. And that Kolomoisky, who is the chief
financier of Zelensky and the financier of the
Azov Movement,
is also the head of the Jewish Congress,
or he was. And he's very clearly a
vile pro Zionist. And, yes, they're openly funding
this group. It's funny how we don't talk
about that overlap. I wonder why.
Now that, I think, was intentional. Now anyway,
the point is that this is a very
dishonest person. That is a
I mean, on the surface, subjective,
assumptive,
childish.
I mean, and there's a lot of people
like this, and she's going for like a
1000000 followers on Twitter. You can decide whether
you think that's genuine or Zionist bots or
whatever you wanna talk about. The point is
that it's hilarious to me that she has
and and look, I mean, think about it
like this, as we read through. Her the
people on Trump's side of this
are seemingly telling him, and I've seen I've
seen seen 3 articles like this already, telling
him we need to get her out of
this. She's not she's not they they're advising
him to not keep her around.
And yet he does anyway. Again, despite her
being like anybody with a brain, objectively
not a gen it's a person who is
the opposite it's a it's a
caricature of a journalist,
and yet he keeps her around.
Who do you think is pushing that? She
is one of the most openly rabid pro
Zionist people in this conversation, and she's one
who is really pushing, like, the most extremely
openly racist points from Israel.
I think there's a reason for that. I
think there's somebody who's, like Trump, who is
listening to what they have to say. That's
my personal opinion. But here's what it says.
Republicans are blaming the influence of Laura Loomer,
a right wing conspiracy theorist for the week's
botched debate performance by Donald Trump. Of course,
it's also easy to go, she he failed
because of her, if you wanna look at
it that way, which included the former president
repeating a bizarre and unfounded claim that pat
pat pat cats and
cats and dogs
are being eaten by Haitian immigrants.
Lumer flew with Trump on his private plane
to Tuesday's debate, I can't believe that, in
Philadelphia. I mean, she he also brought her
up by name in the be in the
Bitcoin speech. This is very strange to me.
And if anybody who is I mean,
even if you think that she's somehow a
good journalist,
what she represents is usually seen as an
as a bad thing for politics. Right? She's
flamboyant. She's very opinion. Like, she it's not
usual.
So I find it interesting
that he has been continually bringing her into
the conversation. I don't think that's by accident.
And, again, frankly, I think that anybody, including
Trump, can see that she's quite ridiculous. But
it says, for this week's botched debate performance
by Donald Trump,
oh, this one. Loomer flew with him and
has been identified as the key promoter of
the pets rumor, surprise, surprise, which has been
dismissed as false by authorities in Springfield where
the practice was alleged to have been taking
place.
The rumor had also been disseminated by JD
Vance. Oh, interesting. Trump's running mate, who in
the aftermath of the debate justified doing so.
Nevertheless, following the event scrutiny has turned on
the supposed role of Loomer.
The semaphore website quoted an unnamed source close
to Trump's campaign as saying they were 100%
concerned about Loomer's sway over the Republican nominee.
Trump this year proposed giving Lumer an official
role in his campaign, but the idea was
resisted by staffers.
Oh, god. That would terrify me. And I
for simple because I what she would do
to this I mean, it that's horrifying. Just
think about what person like that would do.
In a sign of resentment among Trump loyalists
over her supposed influence,
the far right Georgia congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene
attacked her as racist on Wednesday over an
earlier post in which she had said the
White House would smell of curry if Harris,
who has Indian heritage, was elected.
Now even if you wanna call it a
joke or not. Not whether you care about
racism or not. It's just it's just a
low brow thing to do. It is and
by the way, it's exactly what's overtaking a
lot of the republic republican conversation. I've even
seen Gabbard suddenly start making these petty small
points about personalities and what you are and,
oh, she slept with a lot of people
or not that Gabbard said that, but the
point is that's where the conversation's gone to.
They're literally bringing this down to the lowest
common denominator. We're not talking policy. We're talking
about how she cheated and she's not real
and she like, it's just gross.
Of course, you could talk about it. Talk
about everyone. It's free speech. But I I
also because free speech, I can say that
you're acting like a child. There's no decorum
here. We should talk about policy. We should
talk about what actually matters in the long
run. And yes, they're dishonesty and whether they're
infidel. Those things matter. But if we're gonna
pretend like not every every single person in
this entire congressional picture is not also dishonest
and lied about a 1,000 things over their
career, The point should matter about what they're
trying to accomplish, their track record, and what
they're proposing.
But she comes up and makes it a
personal point about her heritage because that's how
gross these people are.
And it says, Denny Leno,
a republican consultant, told Semaphore that Loomer's presence
was not the only factor affecting Trump's performance.
Says, quote, Trump lost the debate because of
his performance or lack thereof. This is one
of peeps somebody on his side. It says,
that's what happens when you wing it. Live
in the Fox News x bubble and rely
on Matt Gaetz,
let alone Laura Loomer.
Interesting.
Now here is that tweet in case you
wanna see it where she says, the how
White House will smell like curry.
And then, of course, then makes a joke
about basically Indian call centers.
The you have to and a survey at
the end of every call. You know, it's
it's just again, it's it's that's not even
that funny, quite frankly. All you're doing is
making a joke about race, about how mo
people on the phones are Indians. It's not
very intelligent either. It's a crude joke about
race. And all I mean, it's it's small,
guys. This is small. Just small person.
And of course, when people start calling these
things out, what does she do? She lashes
out. Personal neg personal points against cares against
everybody.
Here, this is a person highlighting her getting
off the plane, by the way, with Trump's
plane apparently.
And he says And this He says, my
favorite Laura Luebner fact was that she started
an ISIS fan club at her college to
prove that liberals would join, but nobody joined
and she got expelled for starting an ISIS
fan club. I'm gonna point is that she
has been
pretty ridiculous throughout her entire career.
And for and for the most part, was
pretty inconsequential until I think there was a
clear Israel push.
But here's what it says in her Wikipedia
page. In April 2023, it was reported that
Donald Trump wanted to hire her for a
campaign role. However, the idea was said to
have been met with heavy resistance from Trump's
team, as well as warnings from Marjorie Taylor
Greene over hiring a documented liar.
One thing you'll see us ever me and
Marjorie Taylor Greene ever agreeing on, which is
that. She since October 2023,
Lumer has written and posted false claims about
the Israel Hamas war, which is fascinating coming
from Wikipedia.
I mean, she's pro Israel, which arguably so
is Wikipedia. And the point is that she's
still being called out for lies about that.
I just think that I think she's becoming
a pariah to everybody because she's ridiculous.
Close these real quick.
Now here she says and this is the
what Marjorie Taylor Greene makes comment about her.
And I find this fascinating from the idea
that this is internal.
To the point to where she's so close
that Trump is considering of her position, but
Marjorie Taylor Greene, who is at least outspokenly
a part of the MAGA movement and so
on, coming after her because she's dishonest. It's
just interesting.
And she says, we're 50 days out from
the election and Marjorie Taylor Greene is speaking
to the leftist media, which, to me, I
media. It seems like there's each one of
them represented there, but, of course, narrative is
what matters to these people. Make it about
her helping the lefties and you get people
on your side subjectively
as usual.
And it says attacking what Trump's strongest allies.
Quite lot of hubris there, Lumer? You're you're
framing yourself as one of his strongest allies,
which is simply not true. But it says,
can someone say jealous?
You know? And then, that's my point. Small.
You don't need to say that. Like, that's
you being insecure. And it says, there Roger
Teller Green has been telling election integrity activists
in Georgia that she doesn't think Trump will
win. Now my point here,
that's supposed to be a call.
That's why you shouldn't support her. Well, what
if she thinks that? You're not supposed to
say it. And that's exactly the point.
Truth
is less important than helping Trump win. Or
for Kamala, it's the same point. You'll see
just as many democrats like Tarantino. I don't
care what she says. I'm voting for her.
It's the same point. But they what it's
become is that, well, you can't. And so
if you what if you genuinely think he's
not gonna win? Win? You can't say that
out loud? No. You can't. Because that so,
again, truth is secondary
to all of these people. Here's what Mary,
Taylor Greene said. I have concerns about her
rhetoric and her hateful tone. To me, many
of the comments that she makes and how
she attacks Republicans like
me,
that she makes and how she attacks Republicans
like me,
many other Republicans that are strong supporters of
president Trump, I think they're a huge problem.
And that doesn't represent
MAGA as a whole. It doesn't represent who
we are as Republicans.
And, you know, I typically
try to ignore her post, but someone had
sent me that post about Kamala Harris, and
it bothered me so much. And, you know,
my personality, everyone knows I'm outspoken. And I
just felt like it was time to call
it out. I think it's wrong.
We're not a party of identity politics. We're
a party for all Americans.
That's hilarious to me. So she just accused
Lumer of identity that's what it is though.
Right? So this is the point about the
woke right, which is what she is. She's
part of the woke right.
They just have different things they're concerned about.
Right? Different racial aspects, different character traits. It's
all still culture wars. They're all in the
same game. When she's highlighting that point, which
I always have to joke, but the point
is you actually look at her content, it's
all very similar. Right? Arab's bad, Muslim bad.
It's the same kind of thing. It's about
it's it's it is culture stuff. Right? So
it's funny how they love to frame it
as one side or the other. Now I
don't I think Margit Teller Green is pretty
ridiculous, quite frank. Well, again, big surprise from
Ryan. I think they're all ridiculous.
But
I wonder where this is coming from. Is
this that she wants Trump to win and
then she thinks Lewer is just that toxic?
I don't know. You can read it for
yourself. But what's what is interesting is that
we have seen this kind of parasitical aspect
where more so on the right than anything.
Like with Kyle Rittenhouse.
He says something that's objectively true, but they
eat him alive because he said it.
You're not on our team anymore because you
said the truth because and it's bad for
Trump. And even basically cowed him into walking
it back.
So that's kind of I mean, maybe that's
what she's talking about because that's what she's
doing. If you look at her thread, she's
going after anybody that's, like, even briefly saying
something outside their controlled narrative. And again, that's
what they wanna build. And again, both sides.
And I think that's so important.
And I think that that we need to
be focused on our policies, the inflation, the
economy, and the border,
and not attacking people for their race,
not attacking them because they may not have
children and they love their pets. And I
don't wanna have anything to do with that,
and neither do the people, my voters at
home in my district and most people I
talked to across the country. And so, yeah,
I called her out last night,
and and I think it was important to
do.
Now, the other point is about the lifestyle
thing, right? And you'll see that a lot
from these people acting like there's only one
right way to live your life. You have
to be Christian, you have to have a
family. You know, look, I I I have
similar perspectives on what I think is best
for sir for happiness for us, my opinion.
I would never presume to force that on
other people and say, you're this or you're
that because you don't have any kid. But
this is what you're seeing. Right? Because what
it's become is a left back and forth.
It's, again, it's the same thing. It is
a culture war. Right? So it's like, what's
her name? That one actress or a comedian
girl
who made that point about not having kids
and being happy because she can do whatever
she want. And then the right kind of
went after her because she's, you know, whatever.
You know, they called her names, that she's
loose or whatever else. Like, that's what happened.
And it's like it's like that that is
part of the problem.
People, live your life. Isn't that supposed to
be freedom? You know? But we're seeing this
game that people get drawn into that. Now
here's just another example where she goes this
is a guy I forget his name off
the top of my head. Another politician. You
we recognize him.
He's saying he basically calling out Trump for
bringing her to the
911 memorial.
And be why? Because she's a 911 conspiracy
theorist. Well, here's what's hilarious to me.
I would never use the word term conspiracy
theorist because I think it's ridiculous in that
way. But guess what? She is deceiving people
around 911. You know why? Because she'll never
tell you how Israel was involved ever
by design.
And why you think she's brought with Trump
to the 911 Memorial. And that's my opinion,
but I think that's interesting to consider. And
what he's doing is going after Trump from
a political perspective because for their interest, saying
he's a liar, conspiracy theory, and and it's
insulting that she he would bring her to
this because, you know, we memorialize
911, which I'm not agreeing with him in
many ways. But it's interesting to think about
how this is happening from both sides.
And, again, I have to be honest, there's
a part of me that's happy to see
somebody that I know is dishonest being called
out from everybody from all sides.
But here's what she says in response. She's
basically making their point from dollar tree Barack
Obama is speaking. He's such a small person.
Can someone please translate for me?
Translate?
I mean, speaking English by the way, so
that's just a very small in the racist
point apparently or whatever you wanna call it.
What's funny though
is she is lying about 911 unless she
presi presents this. She's going after it from
a very pro Israel perspective which is not
the truth.
So I wanna play this since we didn't
have anything didn't do anything on 911 other
than a couple of interviews and other people
shows. But I, you know, quite frankly, I
think we've done I'll bring up my James
Corbett work that after this. You know, a
lot of work over the years that really
breaks a lot of this down. I do
think it's very important right now and if
I I was free, I would've done a
show probably focused on that. But, you know,
again, it's it's important
to remember the bigger picture.
Make sure you go back and I'll include
some links for you to dive through.
My point is I guess my point is
only that I'm not gonna dive into it
all the next day after because we've I
mean, you know, it's I think we've done
a lot of work on it either way.
But I want to play this one clip.
It's a clip from jay or rather kim.com
breaks out a part of James Corbett's larger
discussion. I included the link to the 911
suspects specifically dancing Israeli's part. But make sure
as I said, do yourself a favor and
watch his entire series, the 911 suspects. It
will change your opinion. Period. There's no way
around it. The source material's there. Either you
want to know the truth or you'll ignore
the truth. That's what'll happen here. Because the
the receipts are with it.
Now here's what he has to say just
about the dancing Israelis, and this should change
your mind. And if you understand, this is
one part of a much larger
grouping of information showing that Israel was undeniably
involved.
All this narrative is still trotted out when
the story of the dancing Israelis is raised
in the media. It is an easily demonstrable
lie. And and just so it's clear, what
we're talking about is a grouping at and
I think it does address in the clip
of Israelis
who were dancing and celebrating and documenting
while 911 happened.
And it was even covered on the ABC.
They literally talked to the woman who saw
them from her window.
FBI reports confirmed that the men were not
taking somber pictures of a horrific event.
When their 76 pictures were developed, they revealed
the men had indeed been celebrating,
smiling, hugging each other, and high fiving.
One of the pictures even featured Siobhan Kurzberg
holding a lighter up with the burning tower
in the background.
And, these were no ordinary tourists.
Oded Elnor had $4700
stuffed into his sock.
They lied to the police about where they
had been that morning.
They were carrying plane tickets for immediate departure
to different places around the globe.
The FBI confirmed that 2 of the men
had ties to Israeli intelligence.
That alone should be enough for you to
ask these questions, guys.
Tickets ready to fly wherever everything I mean,
it's just incredible the amount of evidence that
one never gets brought up in government circles
or paradigm circles, but the fact that this
is so easy to see. Came to suspect
that they had indeed been on a mission
for the Mossad.
They were carrying plane tickets for immediate departure
to different places around the globe.
The FBI confirmed that 2 of the men
had ties to Israeli intelligence
and came to suspect that they had indeed
been on a mission for the Mossad.
And, of course, after returning to Israel, Elnor
claimed on national Israeli TV that they had
been sent there to document the event.
And at that point, we were taken for
another round of questioning.
This time related to our allegedly being members
of Mossad.
The fact of the matter is we are
coming from a country that experiences terror daily.
Our purpose was to document the event.
Their purpose was to document the event?
But, how could they possibly have known what
event they were documenting at that point before
the second plane strike when those few who
even knew about the situation had assumed it
to be an accident or pilot error?
And, when did they arrive at the parking
lot to document the event anyway?
The FBI reports show how the men gave
confused and often conflicting accounts of when and
how they learned about what was happening and
when they arrived at the parking lot. Odette
Elner even said they had arrived there shortly
after 8 AM, which would have been 45
minutes before the attacks even began.
This is in line with one of the
eyewitnesses that had placed their Urban Moving Systems
van at the parking lot at 8 AM.
And by the way, that's Urban Moving is
a moving company, a cutout that they claim
they all worked for despite having tickets to
fly in different places right when they were
gonna be done. And then right afterward, the
entire company disappeared.
I mean, it's just it's so insultingly obvious.
It takes a special kind of willful ignorance
to not acknowledge this.
How could they have been in place and
ready to document the event
unless they knew what was about to happen?
Any way you cut it, this story is
unbelievable.
Men with documented connections to Israeli intelligence and
working in the United States without appropriate permits
were detained after having been caught celebrating the
attack on the World Trade Center at a
time when no one knew that the WTC
strike was an attack.
So, surely, these men are locked behind bars
to this day. Right?
Surely, they were transferred to Guantanamo and held
without trial for 15 years as part of
the war on terror, weren't they?
No.
They were immediately transferred to Federal custody, held
for 71 days, and then deported back to
Israel.
The owner of the Urban Moving Systems company
that had employed them, Dominic Suter, was investigated
by the FBI too.
They concluded that Urban Moving may have been
providing cover for an Israeli intelligence operation
and even seized records and computer systems from
the company's offices. Wow. When they went back
to question him again on September 14th,
he had fled back to Israel. And in
case you're hearing this and going, well, it's
just a man talking, fair enough. I'll include
the link for you to look at all
the receipts, all of the source material that
come mostly from government documents, from very provable
aspects.
And what about the dancing Israelis pictures themselves?
The justice department destroyed their copies on January
27, 2014. Because that makes sense. Right? And
these intelligence agents on an intelligence mission who
were there to document the event of 911
before anyone knew 911 was taking place,
don't worry. They were just spying on Arab
terrorists.
Wow. And while the FBI or certain sources
might believe that in fact they were Israeli
intelligence, they don't believe that the US was
a target, that they were actually investigating Muslim
groups.
They believe if this was an intelligence operation
by Israel, that it was focused on the
Islamic groups, and charities that raise money for
groups that are considered by, US law enforcement
and others terrorist groups.
Which in no way even remotely explains the
idea that they somehow knew what was about
to happen.
But, of course, this is classic, clumsy, cobbled
together, reactive Israeli propaganda where they go, oh,
well, we were there
studying the the Muslim terrorists. You know, the
ones that attacked you. And we happened to
be there because we were following them, and
then they didn't. And we saw it. No.
We we and we celebrated?
Sorry. That doesn't add up, but we'll ignore
all the parts that don't make sense and
just lie to everybody.
It's unreal.
Here is a great breakdown, 3 part documentary
from James Corbett called The Secret History of
Al Qaeda, which includes 911, but also a
lot of other aspects of how the US
government in Israel have literally created Al Qaeda,
ISIS, the whole thing.
Undeniable just like that with the evidence to
back it up. This is actually a part
3,
3 part watch along where we watch along
all 3 of them and we watched the
last one, last year on September 11th live.
And so you can watch and get our
comments and so on. I'll also include his
full documentary, 911 Suspects.
It's unreal how many people. You know, if
Giuliani I mean, he goes over all of
them. All the source material, please make sure
you check it out. Do yourself a favor.
Now to finish this segment, here's Laura Loomer
saying more evidence that Marjorie Taylor Greene is
working with anti Trump, Marxist like Robert Junior
or Kevin or RFK Junior.
Okay. That was, May 9th?
So apparently RFK Junior is a Marxist and
an enemy of everybody.
Not only has he paid RFK Junior over
$300,000,
the whole point, if you read through this,
that she's working with him to circumvent
Trump and to manipulate Trump and all this
and all okay. Big layout with all these
things. None of which I think is even
that end of the day,
what does it amount to?
Oh, actually, let me do this next.
Well,
here's another one. This one is from
August 7th.
Ex UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter,
home in in upstate New York was raided
today by the FBI in part of a
federal investigation.
It says Ritter is RFK Junior's trusted national
security adviser.
Says he he was with RFK Junior yesterday
eating burgers according to Ritter's latest tweet. The
point is simply going, look, Ritter bad, RFK
bad too.
And if she uses the same claim about
sex offender right? He has addressed this so
many times. It is a ridiculously manipulated claim.
Our I argue clearly against somebody who is
calling out things in the government. But he
addressed this very clearly. And it's obvious what
he said. You could doubt him if you'd
like. But to keep making the case that
he's somehow a, you know, a rapist or
whatever, it's not true. Based on the evidence
that we can see and based on what
he's presented, you can look at it for
yourself.
The bottom line,
RFK Jr. Is a cancer.
Okay. August 7th.
What's what's this? This one is hey. August
23rd. So a couple weeks go by. 2
days later,
as at his rally, Trump said RFK is
the greatest thing ever, so now we love
RFK. Yay.
I'm proud, Bobby. You and a party make
America great.
Yeah. We should all laugh because these people
are ridiculous. Because you are hypocritical, you are
subjective, and at the end of the day,
he's the biggest Marxist terrorist terror, but now,
oh, yay. Trump likes him and he's gonna
change because he said so. So facts don't
matter, so nothing other than statements matter. Okay.
Understood.
And the bottom line is uni uni party?
So now you're turning the very thing that
we're pointing at as a problem into the
yay. We're gonna now have a uni party.
Why would anybody cheer for uni party?
Doesn't that imply that we don't have and
yes. It means there's no choice. There's no
options. But that's okay because we have the
right option. It's just
it's hilarious to me. Uni party is exactly
the point. Not because RFK joins Trump, that
they want you to think as democrats, the
good democrats are joining the good republicans. You
know? Well, that would still constitute a 2
party game because there's still the other people
that you're pointing at. Facts, logic. You know?
I know it's tough for them.
Now that thing this was oh, and I'll
just I'm sorry. I was gonna I put
this the wrong spot. Let's do both of
these.
Here's one from August 23rd again. Says did
you know that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris
were never mentioned? They never mentioned RK junior?
Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, the democrats can no
longer ignore RK junior. RK junior, Donald Trump
will create the unit party.
Okay. This is 2 weeks ago. She he
was a Marxist may somebody was gonna destroy
everything.
Now, they won't talk about him because he's
the best. In case we I don't know.
Anybody looks at this stuff and doesn't acknowledge
that that's at least inconsistent.
And then, of course, he highlights this.
Vladimir Putin just endorsed Kamala Harris. That was
what I was saying earlier.
That's not, like, kinda, it was a joke,
but we can make a point of it.
No. That's he did that. We knew it.
See? Because Trump's not the one with Russia.
She's the one with Russia. Even though it's
based on something that is objectively a joke.
Well, maybe he does support her, but that's
what he said was not him going, I
officially endorse Kamala Harris. He was joking and
said, Biden called on all of his allies
to support her, so I guess I have
to. And they laugh about it.
Either they didn't she didn't know that, which
is embarrassing, or it doesn't matter, which is
insulting.
That's how this works.
Look. Trump and RFK Junior are fighting to
make America safe and healthy again.
September 6th.
Now here, of course, is the one point
that we won't get into from this objective
coverage. Right? The fact that he will not
point blank
acknowledge Israel's influence.
This is this is actually a really important
clip. Just the way that Dave's face looks,
the way that RFK's face looked, the way
that he responds,
it's un now look, my opinion, this is
subjective,
but I think it's obvious.
1, he didn't expect the question. 2, that
his answer shows you that he knows but
chose not to answer. My opinion, decide for
yourself.
Do you have concerns about,
the the level of
Israeli influence in our our politics here in
the United States of America?
I I don't know. I mean, I I
don't know.
I just I'm not, you know, I'm not
a politician
in Wow. Political office, so I don't see
much of that.
So you don't think like so so in
after,
911
Listen. I think, listen. I think everybody
has, you know, that that there's so many
malevolent influences on Capitol Hill,
and they include Like a Dave's face.
He's just so obvious. Like, this is b
s. Many nations, and they include many, you
know, corporate entities.
Oh, and I, you know, I wanna have
a real democracy in our country where you
have money out of politics and the influence
out of politics. That's what I would like
and have. That'd be nice publicly funded elections
Oh, I don't think anybody but do I
think the israelis have more influence than others?
I David I believe
in the, you know, in supporting Israel that
it's important to the United States. He didn't
even answer his own question.
So if you I think is your point
that, well, everybody manipulates congress, therefore they don't
do so any more than anybody else? That's
wild. Because That's essentially what his point was
leading to.
Either way,
how was this what I mean, your argument
should be to acknowledge that. Like, right now,
if the whole point is changed, it'd be
like, This is the problem.
Clearly, he did not wanna highlight that. And
you and I can disagree on that. I
believe, and I believe our aid to Israel
of $4,000,000,000
a year is designed to keep the peace
over time. Wow. Wow. Wow. Watch watch the
beginning again. Watch Dave's face. Watch the response.
The gap is important. Concerns about,
the the level of
Israeli influence in our our politics here in
the United States of America?
I I don't know.
Whoo. That's rough.
Okay. So and then what watch Dave's face.
I mean, I I don't know.
It's that one and then this one right
here. He's like he just he's laughing.
But either way, the point
is so you don't know. So his point
was directly. Does Israel you know, are you
worried about Israel's influence?
And weirdly pauses then says, I don't know.
Okay. But then you go on to say
that, well, there's so many malevolent influences
on on congress and, you know, do they
have more? Didn't answer it.
So you're acknowledging they do, acknowledging a lot
of people do, but yet not getting into
the point of whether that's a reality, acknowledging
his question, do they have too much?
Do they the fact that they have any
should bother everybody, especially with what's going on
today, and that he's unwilling to even acknowledge
that, let alone push back on it. I
just think that that is a no that's
a nonstarter for me.
For any of them. Because this is about
a an obvious Zionist influence that is literally,
openly, gleefully committing genocide with their support. That's
not the only issue that matters. But it
clearly is paramount in the conversation when they're
using your tax dollars to murder people around
the world, not just in Gaza.
Now here is one of the points about
the that debate and the segment
as Greg Stoker points out.
So
Kamala is doing her, closing statement thing. I
just like to emphasize and bring to everyone's
attention that
just like everything,
every event that happens in America, whether it's
the Super Bowl or the Oscars, Israel is
currently using this cover to bomb the shit
out of Lebanon
and Gaza.
Yep.
And that's important. So along with everything else,
Israel, as usual, uses these events that we
celebrate to murder people. And that's not an
accident, guys. That's by design.
Every Christmas, every Easter, it happens every time.
He's not wrong.
But yeah, that's no big deal, right? Because
we just don't talk about it because r
f people the RFKs of the world who
pretend to be on your side will steer
away from it when it's necessary.
That's very problematic.
Now let's talk about what Israel's doing.
Because Robert wrote an excellent article about Syria,
which you may not have heard about because
we're focused on so many other things. And
this does matter.
Whether it's about the world and just international
law and how that directly affects your life
because your government is the one
complicit in all this,
or the fact that they're using your tax
dollars to do it.
Israel's largest unprovoked attack on Syria in years
kills at least 18 in Syria.
So just despite the fact that the Israeli
Air Force has carried out hundreds of air
strikes against Syria since that time since, you
know, for since a long time, Syria has
not responded since 2018.
While the Syrian state was fighting an intensive
civil war
against a western gulf backed series of opposition
groups between 2,011 and 2,018,
completely illegal, ever very transparent, that's moderate rebels,
that's all the stuff we know, both sides
of our paradigm.
The situation has somewhat stabilized since then. He
goes, however, 1 third of Syrian territory is
illegally under the de facto control of the
United States, as Trump openly stated, will take
the oil,
and their allies,
while the northwestern Idlib province is controlled by
Herat Tar al Sham. That's Al Qaeda, that's
terrorism, that's the moderate rebels, that's who they
support.
Israel as well.
And then Turkey, NATO ally,
also occupies land across northern Syria. See how
everyone just the the rules based order just
kinda chops it up and takes what they
want because they're criminals, not rules based at
all. That's a it's rules for the but
not for me kind of a game. That's
that's no one's cared about that. In the
context of the ones dictating how the world
works. Right? It says this as EU US
sanctions have also made it impossible for the
dam damac Damascus
based government,
Syria, to reconstruct much of the nation that
was torn apart during the war.
Yeah. Because you care about the Syrian people.
Right? Right, guys? That we're fighting for them,
but we keep sanctions in place for a
half a decade to make sure you can't
rebuild for those people? Yeah. Because Assad's bad,
and we don't like him even though you're
the ones that gassed everybody and blamed it
on him because we can easily prove that.
Nope. Doesn't matter. There's the important part. Israel
has attacked Syria
over 70 times, 7 0, just since October
7th.
70 times. Every single one of those is
illegal. There's no act there's no declaration of
war. There's not some response that they're responding
to, re defense. No. They're just bombing Syria.
He says the Syrian Arab Army has not
acted or reacted against Israel. Instead,
the Syrian government, as I said before, appeals
to the United Nations, As it has done
continually since 2018. Oh, weird. It's 2024.
I guess they're just very slow in
doling out justice. Right? Or at the very
least, upholding the law.
In case you're missing my sarcasm, that's not
what they're there to do.
Or however we're talking about the bigger overlap
of things. I mean, there are movable parts
and different aspects of pe you know, like
within groups in the United States that believe
and actually try to do some good. My
point is, from the top down, these establishments
are not on your side. And the clear
reality of that is how we can see
the crime. Everybody can see the crime. And
because Israel and the United States have a
veto, they never let anything change. And on
top of that, there's other mechanisms that could
be employed, but they don't do that either.
Outside of Israel and United States. So they
just let Syria continue to be murdered. Civilians
in Damascus or wherever else get bombed and
attacked whenever they decide to, and they go,
you know, Iran or something. No evidence. No
claims. Even if they're there, does that mean
they have the right to bomb Syria? And
it just keeps happening.
Like it just did again.
I believe on 9th.
It says,
which the United Nations, despite all of that,
does not restrain the Israelis in any way.
Barely even doesn't even speak up about it
90% of the time. Even after numerous attacks
against civilian neighborhoods,
port facilities,
and the nation's 2 international airports. Let's not
forget,
Trump
assassinated
Soleimani in an airport. The Iraqi airport.
The point is that they do these things
all the time. These are massive war crimes.
Just because they have a narrative for why
that might line up with what they want,
doesn't mean it's legal
or even right.
It doesn't matter though.
Now here it says, so when the Israeli
regime is in a state of embarrassment, like
right now, and is seeking to secure small
victories,
it uses Syria as its punching bag.
With full knowledge, which, by the way, means
killing of civilians every time, with full knowledge
that the Syrian army will only use its
air defenses to do nothing offensively.
Or that Syrian army will
yeah. So basically, oh, no. Nothing. Only defend
when they're coming in, but not fire back.
But it says, sir saying this,
it is not as if Syria plays no
role in regional events
as it is the actually the hub for
regional resistance against Israel and acts as a
base of operations for countless armed groups throughout
the region. That's now post October 7th, mind
you. Also, allowing for the transfer of weapons
to Hezbollah in Lebanon. Therefore, it plays a
major role in the fight against the Israeli
military without actually engaging directly in combat. Now
for plenty, that'll be more than enough because
they've decided their terrorism because bad guy.
Not based on anything other than narratives from
the actual bad guys, or rather the most
obvious example of the bad guys. Again, I
think most of these governments would be in
the same position should they have the same
amount of power.
Either way,
the US government sells weapons to the most,
and I mean, the most dangerous people in
the world.
Not my opinion. There's think tanks all over
the world that dictate every year these reports
come out. The most dangerous, the most at
risk, the places that are most likely to
use them for war crimes, like Israel, like
any number of groups, like moderate rebels and
things I mean, all over their different locations.
Groups that they're funding. We talked about the
Honduras coup. In 2,009, we talked about the
attempted coup in Venezuela. This is this is
what we're talking about.
They will sell weapons to people knowing they're
gonna kill civilians. They'll give chemical weapons to
Israel. They'll give chemical it doesn't all over
the world.
But that's not a problem because they're selling
weapons to their allies.
Over here, when the same dynamic is happening
and arguably with less murder,
they're terrorists because weapons.
That's it. It's amazing how simple these things
are and people fall for it because they
want to.
Now it says, therefore okay. I've read that.
And it goes on to say, the threats
against Lebanon are inherently tied to the fate
of the sea of Syria also.
This is because of of the fact that
the Israeli army chose to go to war
damn it. It's a typo. Chose to go
war against Hezbollah.
They will have to launch a large scale
attack against Syrian territory as well. If Israel
seeks to conduct a ground operation against Lebanon,
it would be a suicide mission should they
deploy directly over the Lebanese border. And so
it is more likely that they will choose
to invade Syria first.
In the event that the Israelis aren't looking
for a full scale war, they will still
likely attack targets throughout Syria to prevent supplies
heading through to Lebanon. Now here's the main
point.
Why do you think all this is happening?
Why do you think the US government's occupying
Syria? Why do you think they're bombing them?
Because of what he just highlighted for you.
It's the same re it's in fact almost
what is what US government was kind of
saying. That we need to go after this
location, well, arguably because of Assad and because
of the oil, Trump would say. But as
many strategists from these administrations
have said,
geostrategic control.
Supply lines.
They need to control Syria because they need
their supply lines, but also to stop anybody
else. And because it's right the point is
that they need to control Syria before they
go after the others they're talking about, at
least, logically speaking.
All but they'll always jam down the humanitarian
narrative.
Even at a time when nobody even believes
that anymore.
But here's Syria calling out the crimes, you
know, going through the right channels. Here, UN,
we're being attacked. Oh, nobody cares. Here's Israel
murdering children. And, you know, it's just it's
crazy how these people do not react
other than when being like, oh, I guess
these people. But, anyway, the point is about
a multifaceted entity with the US and Israel
being able to veto most everything.
Bottom line is Syria is trying to go
the right route, sort of like Palestinians and
BDS, but what they do, they get called
terrorists for doing it.
Now this is a report from Yemen. Foreign
policy, 2 girls reportedly killed in US strike
near school in Yemen.
So US government bombing Yemen,
killing children in a school.
Funny how their actions seem to be pretty
much unified.
Now why are they bombing Yemen?
Because they claim that they're terrorists. Well, in
fact, it's one of the most impoverished countries
in the world, and yet they're the only
one actually standing up and pushing back and
then having a huge effect on what Israel's
capable of right now.
That's why. They don't like that they're being
shown that that's how
I mean, not powerful they are. If this
impoverished nation that you've been starving to death
for a decade can step up and stop
you still?
It says, Yemeni media reported Tuesday that a
joint US British airstrike struck nearest school in
a Houthi controlled area, which is a popular
movement supported by all the people of Yemen,
Killing 2 female students and wounding 9 o
9 more.
To what end? Why is this even legal?
It's a fair question. They're not there's no
I mean, they have been starving them to
death for a long time. And I mean
literally.
People have been dying of starvation in this
in because they're openly blocking the import of
food and water and medicine, everything else to
the high who data port.
The US has kept a heavy bombing campaign
in Yemen since January.
All under the guise of stopping them from
stopping the blockade.
Sure has worked though, hasn't it? Since January.
You'd think that they would go, oh, well,
we're just murdering people for no reason. They're
not gonna stop. No. They don't care. Probably
because Israel wants them to keep bombing,
which has only escalated the situation.
Yemeni media typically reports all the US attacks
as joint US British strikes
since the UK has jointly severed,
joined several of the bombings. But the majority
of the strikes have been launched unilaterally by
the United States. This is via antiwar.com.
The Houthis, the Ansar Allah movement, strongly condemned
the strike, quote,
targeting civilians and educational facilities is a dangerous
escalation that reflects the American and British frustration
due to their failure to protect Israeli navigation
in the Red Sea. Nailed it.
They're just straight at I mean, they're just
they're doing what Israel's doing. Oh, yeah? Well,
we're gonna kill your kids. How about that?
That's who
they are. Now getting into Israel in general,
I think it's very important for people to
understand that you're being lied to in the
West. I mean, I've been nailing this to
the wall for months now. But if you
haven't seen it, it's important to understand
what you're being sold in the west through
Israel and the western media is a complete
fabrication.
The Israeli media is telling you everything that
the west is not, which is so wild
to me. I mean, is it is it
the case that they have less influence over
their media than they do on western media?
It's certainly possible. But you can decide for
yourself. The point is, what we can see
is backed up by Israeli media. And it's
the case whether or not they wrote this.
Here's the opinion from Haaretz. This is from
the 3rd September.
It is not Hamas that is collapsing,
but Israel.
That's from an the leading Israeli newspaper.
Israel's collapsing, not Hamas.
Here is
Steven Walt.
Armand Batrand is writing is is covering what
he said here, basically saying,
possibly the most renowned Harvard professor
of international relations. His point?
The Palestinian resistance movement
is completely legitimate.
Why? Because, as you've heard from me thousands
of times, international law explicitly says that populations
under occupation
have a right to resist.
And, basically, by the 19 nineties, the Israelis
had won.
They their state was established. It was prosperous.
It had nuclear weapons. It had military superiority
in the region. It has peace with Egypt,
peace with Jordan.
Right? Syria is not a serious problem for
the Israelis anymore. The Soviet Union is gone,
so the Arabs don't have a great power
ally to help them. The Israelis have won.
And in victory, they needed to be generous.
They needed to be generous and say, the
only problem we have left is the Palestinian
problem, and what they need is a state,
and we want that state run by legitimate,
popular,
highly competent people who aren't interested in going
to war anymore.
And instead, what the Israelis did was they
kept building settlements, and they did everything they
possibly could
to keep the Palestinians
weak and divided as a result of which
they have faced violent movements
doing the only thing that's left to them.
But let's not forget that in so in
keeping them divided, one of the main things
they did was fund and grow the very
thing he just pointed to. So that's not
by that's there is a level of just
byproduct there, but they made that the reality.
They turned that into what it is today
so they could keep them divided.
So that's important to recognize. So if you
wanna blame somebody for any of this, Israel
is explicitly a fault.
Right? Which is to try and resist. It's
worth, by the way, worth remembering that the
UN Charter
explicitly says that I'm sorry. Not the UN
Charter. International law explicitly says that,
that populations under belligerent resistance have the right
or a belligerent occupation have the right to
resist.
How they resist matters.
Right? So they can't commit war crimes in
resisting,
which is why what Hamas did on October
7th was wrong.
Right? But it's not like they have no
right to resist as But that's I would
argue it's a bad way to frame that.
Now clearly, he he's an expert in the
field, so you guys consider it for what
you will.
But the reality, as I understand it, is
clearly like, I mean, it's the same point
you make it in any other war. By
that logic, any war crime committed by any
individual would invalidate the entire war. Now maybe
that should be the case, but it's clearly
not based on the consistency of US foreign
policy or Israel foreign policy. So the point
to be made is that, yes, crimes were
committed. The the taking of the children, undeniably.
Despite the fact that they were later killed
by IDF bombs and they still use their
names, the Bivas family, every day.
The point is that those were crimes. They
need to be called out. But the active
resistance is not invalidated.
Now I argue if you actually if I
had him, he'd probably make that point clear
if you had him on the show. But,
I think that is the provable reality.
Well, and I think Americans often forget that.
That what you know, Palestinian resistance is completely
legitimate provided it follows the laws of war.
Right.
Now here's what B'Tselem has to say on
the other side of this. B'Tselem being the
leading human rights group in Israel. It's an
Israeli human rights group. In fact, one of
the leading groups in the world that says
the Israeli government places no value on human
life,
whether of its Gazan subjects
or of its own citizens.
Wow. That's pretty extreme.
There this is the Israeli group talking about
the Israeli government. Now you won't you'd be
surprised probably to find out that's what a
lot of Israelis are thinking right now.
It says the 6 Israeli hostages whose bodies
were recovered from Gaza this morning could have
been saved if the Israeli government had heeded
the pleas of their families and Israeli public
to reach a ceasefire and an exchange deal.
The Israeli government places no value on human
life whether if it's gods and citizens or
if it's own. And we're gonna get to
the ceasefire in a minute down, down in,
you know, down the line.
The point is clearly and I think it's
right here. Yeah. Look. This is look at
this headline. This is the reality.
Netanyahu rejects US assessment on the ceasefire. Says
there's, quote,
not a deal in the making. At the
exact moment, here's Blink and the rest going,
it's up to Hamas to accept the deal.
Like, they know they're lying to you guys.
It's wild.
And they know that you can see it
if you just look, which shows you that
they're desperate.
That's seldom. Right on the surface. I'll include
this. I won't go through it now, but
here's Linda Mamone simply highlighting as she says
a lot of people in the US don't
seem to know what Israel did to Palestinians
long before October 7th.
Just just a quick, you know, word text
breakdown showing you all the different atrocities that
have been committed over the years, that they
all get lied about.
Zachary Foster saying the greatest myth of Zionism
and the state of Israel is that the
point of the enterprise is to protect Jews.
I'm making this point all the time. He
says false. There are Zachary Foster has a
PhD
in in Palestinian history from Princeton.
And I'll include this.
Interview with Zachary. He's a good smart guy.
This now he says the goal of Zionism
was to create a Jewish state in a
land that was 95%
non Jewish.
To do that, many, many, many Jews needed
to and still need to sacrifice their lives
to that end.
And as well as Christians, let's not forget,
it's the majority of Zionists in the world
today are Christian Zionists, not Christians that support
Zionism, but openly Christian Zionists. Because the game
they play where Zionism
is just only about Jews is not true.
It's just simply not. In fact, the origin
of it goes back to Hersl who was
an atheist, but original entities are are arguably
based on historians, Christians, Christian Zionists, who then
sort of tricked the Jews into
starting this out of the idea that they
would bring on the end times. And now
Jews are saying the same thing about Christians.
When they're destroyed, it'll bring on the end
times. All this is easy to look
up. Whether it's real or not, they believe
it. The point is that ultimately, it is
about a manipulation of, I think, whoever will
be who will be used. But it says,
that's why 1% of the Jews in Palestine
died in 1948.
6,000 Jews had to die to make a
Jewish state possible in a land that was
2 thirds non Jewish. That's why in 19
fifties, Israel built a 108 civilian centers in
border areas to serve as its first line
of military defense, including towns like Nahal Az,
short for Nahalem Mul Azah,
Nahal soldiers across from Gaza, which tragically ended
up serving the purpose for which it was
built, to put Israeli civilians on the front
lines as human shields.
It's what they do now.
That's why military service is required for most
Jews in Israel. The state needs more and
more Jewish bodies to sacrifice their own lives
to ensure acquiescence to the project of Jewish
dominance in Palestine.
That's also why Israel invoked Hannibal directive on
October 7th, provable now based on everybody's statements,
killing and they say is from their own
government, their media. I mean, everybody's acknowledged at
this point despite individual Zionists who say otherwise.
Killing dozens, if not 100 of Israelis on
October 7th, Jewish bodies were the sacrificial lambs
necessary to ensure the Jewish state could maintain
its strategic domination
over the Palestinians.
That's also why the Israeli hostages and prisoners
of war have been left to die. The
state of Israel cares about its own preservation
and domination, not about saving Jews. For 76
years, the state of Israel has proven itself
to be a total menace to the Jewish
people. In my opinion, as I've said many
times, it is the biggest threat to Jewish
people in the world.
I call on all people who care about
the well the well-being of the Jewish people,
he's a Jew himself by the way, to
stop arming Israel and start stop supporting this
genocidal state. The survival of the Jewish people
depends on it.
Also include this.
For he may have pushed back on the
idea, even though he's a Jew himself, on
the idea of Jewish supremacy or whatever. Forget
the way he framed it. This again is
the leading Israeli human rights group.
That's Ellen.
The headline, Jan for January 2021, a regime
of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to
the Mediterranean Sea. This is apartheid.
That you you could push back all you
want, make it about racism. This is obviously
what is being perceived as I mean, guys,
it's what they state publicly themselves.
Now, but be clear about the manipulation that
I'm highlighting within it around Zionism. Either way,
clearly.
The there the idea that this is not
I mean, it's on the surface of the
conversation at this point.
Include that for you.
This one too.
Now, moving on to the next point.
I wanted to highlight some points around this
that I thought were relevant to mo largely
around the awareness of what Israel is becoming
or has always been. And and one of
the main things we keep seeing is that
WikiLeaks or rather, excuse me, the, the ICJ,
ICC,
Khan and the prosecutor therein,
has been pushing for actual accountability, which maybe
that's just politically advantageous for him or,
you know, his own career. I don't know.
Because, I mean, he to be clear, his
history is pretty bad on this topic. But
now he stood up and says, quote, or
he says that they said this to him.
And he already said before that they said
to him, we started this for African countries
and Russia.
It's very embarrassing for them because they pretend
that they're all about equal, equality, and the
law. No. They're not. They're simply not. He
says that they told him world leaders threatened
him, quote, target Israel, and we will target
you.
Think about that. Think about how clear this
is. That's why people like Trump and Kamala
and whoever else we have to ask, what
is actually driving this? RFK Junior.
What's driving this weird adherence to the law?
Everything that counters what he is, at least
he presents to be.
Target Israel, we will target you.
That's through the ICC prosecutor.
And, of course, the US government,
we you know, what what did Blinken say?
The difference between us and Hamas is we
uphold international law. Well, clearly not.
Mohammed Shehada points out Israel is preventing
the US government from obtaining any testimonies, evidence
from IDF soldiers and officers who were active
on October 7th out of, quote, fear
that it'd be used against them in US
tribunals in The Hague. This is a quote
from Israeli media.
Think about how crazy that is. They won't
let them get testimony from his Israeli soldiers
that were there because they're openly going, well,
you're gonna use it against us in international
law. They know that they're guilty.
It says right here in Israeli media, the
link below, they is the in it the
title is saying Israel transferred evidence from the
massacre to the US, except
from the soldiers, and evidence means they're propaganda
videos they've cut together with lies. In in
Israel, they cooperate with American investigators and allowed
them to collect testimonies. However, it was decided
not to transfer evidence collected from the soldiers
for fear that it would be used against
them. An American tribunal.
I mean, how else do you read that?
Now Sam Husseini highlights another lie been circulating.
ICJ denies South Africa's genocide case
extension.
But his point is, this is Twitter pushing
this story with no evidence. Tax community notes.
Hey. What do you know? There's no comment
from community notes. I guess they just missed
it.
The point is here's here's more in rebounding,
and this is the case. ICJ could not
have refused South Africa's request for deferral because
no such request was ever made.
But it's a mere merry excuse to regurgitate
blood libel yet again, using that against them
in quotes, to juice to go juvenile with
anal,
anal references and defame demonized opponents to genocide.
So what the hell?
And he's tagging what Aviva Klopp has said,
one of the classic propagandists.
And, you know, and the point so Sam's
calling this out. Here's what she posted.
First said, unable to find evidence, and she
highlights a weird cut out, a lot of
Twitter files, that doesn't show you where it
came from. Isn't it strange? It's from Jewish
Syndicate. And the idea is this platform is
a completely openly propagandizing
it lies for Israel. I've shown you countless
examples where they were blatantly selling you on
the narrative that later draws to be false.
But she goes, unable to find evidence of
genocide taking place in Gaza, South Africa's asked
them for extension to give more time to
find, fabricate, question mark, evidence?
Great. So using a false claim based on
a Twitter file screenshot to insinuate something on
top of that. Really great stuff.
This is a liar. This person's been caught
lying like all of them around. They are
desperately
like, think about this. They've had to make
up this story to push this out. They
know they're doing that. She goes, this has
been the most covered conflict in the world
for nearly a year. How South Africa considered
that they can't find evidence? I mean, how
are we even pretending? Think about the gall
to stand up and say that we can't
find evidence when you can turn on Twitter
and find 14 examples in 10 seconds
Or TikTok. Ever and there these these soldiers
are posting it themselves.
But here she is, desperate to hide this
because, I don't know, she's being paid because
she thinks she's gonna be held accountable. I
I don't know. I I as I've said
to her online, is I hope you are
desperately unhappy.
Because I I actually I think I have
that coming up in a second.
The international court of justice, she follows up,
has refused the deadline. So a fake story
and then a fake claim on top of
that story, and he says the same thing.
What evidence do you have for this? Who
do you know? It's Funny how they don't
respond. This person says it's just the new
outlet she edited out on purpose because you
get the point.
These people are ridiculous, guys. It's embarrassing.
Sam Musseini is calling on community notes. Now
I can you think of any reason why
community notes wouldn't chime in?
Maybe the Israel overlap and the CHEQ bots
and the autentics verification and all the very
clear Israeli intelligence military investment in Twitter? Gee,
I wonder why.
Now here's what I find find interesting. Here's
so see the press. This is from September
3rd.
US charges Hamas leader. You know, the leaders
kept comfortable in Qatar that Israel funds, because
we don't wanna talk about that. Other militants
in connection with October 7th massacre. Think about
how much evidence there is around what's going
on post October 7th.
And the US government just deflects and denies
and remove and the the only thing coming
out of October 7th is a bunch of
mostly debunked narratives coming from Israel. Other than
the obvious, which we know, they they went
in under a legal act of armed resistance,
and, yes, they did kidnap children, and, yes,
there was acts that you could call crimes.
But that's been sitting there for 11, 12
months.
You have
12 months of nonstop
murder, genocide, rape, torture that has even been
proven by Israeli entities, by corporate media itself,
and yet where's the charge against Israel?
You see how ridiculous that is? Like, look,
I could argue, yes. There's a clear case
we made about charges that could be leveled
against individuals from October 7th.
But funny that it's aimed at individuals that
you can clearly show are being protected in
Qatar and are being funded by Israel, but
either because I don't think it'll amount to
anything while ignoring all the crimes that we
can prove
far more evidence.
You know the end. You know why. It's
obvious. It's they don't are not gonna go
after Israel.
But here's senator John Fess John Fetterman.
I mean, I think it was a good
point to make. ICC prosecutor seeks warrants against
Israeli leaders with utmost urgency, Times of Israel.
And he says, no standing,
untrue. Everyone in the world can see that
they're clearly committing crimes. No relevance.
No relevance?
And in what context?
You mean, they're both committing I mean, I
just just the guy this guy is simply
regurgitating. Or I I question whether he's even
the one typing this out. No credibility.
Then he goes, here's the point. This false
equivalence between them, they just love keeping here's
what's funny about this.
In what way?
What's the false equivalence? What what equivalence are
you looking for here?
Equivalence
under the law.
So are you literally saying that they're the
law applies differently?
That's not what he wants you to take
from. That's the only way you can read
this. Because to the point is, well, they're
not the same thing. You can't treat them
the same. Well, the only way to read
that is that the law should be applied
differently.
But that's not how that's supposed to work,
you know? Bl blind justice and all. Right?
If you commit a crime, you're held accountable
for that crime. You murder someone, you go
to jail. You rape, torture, you get held
accountable. But what they're trying to tell you
is you can't do it the same way
for both.
But if you flesh it out one more
step, it becomes obvious that you're literally claiming
that the law doesn't apply to them. It
only applies to terrorists.
That's exactly what they think. So clumsy John
Fetterman is just showing you the game like
they all seem to do because Israel is
more interested in selling you on their narrative,
especially when that makes the US look bad.
But here I mean, and this is just
from this is from the first. I just
had this one that's off the side, but
every day is like this.
Brian Riz Raspiani, September 1st.
52 Palestinians were killed in the last 24
hours. 52.
But we only heard of the 6 hostages.
Israeli hostages. 1 the the, you know, the
American Israeli hostage. But what about the other
American overlaps? What about the 600 Palestinian Americans
that have been trapped and bombed to death
inside of his Palestine,
Gaza, since October 7th, as NPR wrote about.
Nobody cares about them.
My point is that, obviously, life does not
matter the same to these people if you're
on one side or the other.
He also writes,
I encourage you and this is the point
about this. So if we
the reality of what most Israelis seem to
project
is undeniable.
That does not mean every Israeli, every Jew
thinks the same way.
But just like every government propagandizes
people, you can easily see that most Israelis
have a an an an unhealthy
hatred for Palestinians by and large. Not terrorism,
but just if you're a Palestinian. A child
that was born 10 seconds ago, like Laura
Loomer famously said with George Galloway in an
interview a long time ago, they're all terrorists.
Because that's how dumb this is. It's the
same point they make up people in reverse
who say, oh, Jews are the problem. You
mean that child that was just born and
their family's Jewish? That child's now a bad
person? Yep. No. You're ridiculous. You're both racist
and you're both ridiculous.
The bottom line
is that you can see this prevalent in
their society where a lot of Israelis have
been engineered
to blindly hate them just because they're Palestinians.
Now you can make a fair argument about
some case that that level of that happens
on the other side too. But the different
point that to make, both of which would
be wrong in the larger sense, but the
point to make is that Israel has been
genociding them. They have been illegal occupying them.
They have been raping and torturing and murder.
Yes. That is easy to prove. Now has
any level of, you know, Hamas or other
groups reacted in some ways that you could
argue are not the right path to take?
Yeah. Of course.
But as always,
legal resistance
within within the legal construct of that law.
And that's the point to make.
So here, we're gonna show you a clip
that you've probably already seen of 2 Jewish
podcasters
saying the lot quiet part out loud. And
now coming back around and going, you took
us out of context. No. No. You really
didn't. Which shows you that they know somewhere
that they're wrong or at the very least
that they know that you seeing them say
that
is bad for their image, which means at
the very least they know that you know
or you think that it's wrong. It is
wrong. As Ryan says, I encourage you to
watch this and get a window into the
Israeli mindset.
Made me sick.
People in Israel, if you go oh, I'll
I'll just he they they just I think
he just writes it out. I'm gonna let
you listen to it.
Here's Owen Jones. I'll I'll read that next,
actually.
I would
if you gave me a button to just
erase Gaza, every single living
being in Gaza
would no longer be living tomorrow, I would
press it in a second.
Wow, that's just I think, I mean, I
think most Israeli If that's the choice. Yeah.
Yeah.
Mhmm.
No. Even if it's not, like, right now.
Yeah. No. I would press it right now.
Mhmm.
Right. So if that's the choice, try to
add some kind of qualifier, it doesn't matter
how you frame this. Your idea is that
we would kill all of them if I
had the option.
You listen to the rest of it. I've
listened to I it's that is in context.
It's disgusting, and these people are disgusting.
Yeah. And same with the territories. I would
press it right now.
And by oh, by the way. No. He
needs, you know, show on He needs the
West Bank, by the way. So how do
you factor that in? If the whole point
is Hamas bad guy and all of it
but, you know, West Bank, we've allowed to
live differently and that's not even if they
wanna tell you today, oh, Hamas is there
and now they're going after them today. The
point is that the idea would be Palestine.
And that's it's obvious based on the idea
that we would destroy them all. There's no
way you make this about only the terrorists
unless you wanna say all Palestinians by default
are terrorists, which is what actually they all
think. The people saying this, by the way.
Not all Israelis are all Jews. But the
reality is, you can't decouple those two things.
So as they go into Gaza and just
murder everybody, that's obviously the plan, guys. And
even your government knows that. And they're not
only allowing it, They're helping it. They're arming
it. They're part of it.
Is safe at home? God willing. I don't
know. I haven't spoken to her in, like,
an hour.
No. I'm saying for the chance.
Yeah. Yeah. I would press it right now.
Give me that button. I'd press it right
now. There you go.
And I think most Israelis would. Yeah. Most
Jewish Israelis. They wouldn't post they wouldn't talk
about it like I am. Mhmm. They wouldn't
post they wouldn't say I pressed it. Yeah.
But they would They don't have balls of
steel like you. They would
but they would press it. You're right? Yeah.
Balls are steel. Right? Now he now he's
trying to walk it back. I would take
it under context. Yeah. Real tough.
Right? The bottom line is it's obvious. He's
just it's genocidal.
Whether it's engineered or not, they're all I
would kill them all. That's the only way
you could take that. Like, if they were
in a closet alone, they would they wouldn't
even hesitate.
Mhmm. Someone came to them, and the dark
said, no one will know. You press this,
all the Palestinians are gone. Yeah. And you
know what that means? That means you're disgusting.
The whole the main point they're under to
realize about people, you know, you are the
actions you take when you think no one's
looking. That's who you are.
He's telling you right now. If not if
if yeah. I'll I'll do it. Yeah. The
bottom line is that even if you do
it in the quiet where you nobody would
see you, that's that's more who you are
than anything else.
And as you're jokingly talking about this, children
are starved to death. As you're making fun
of this and laughing about it, pea kids
were literally just blown to pieces by Israel.
That's the
reality. You'd be like, fuck me. Is there
another one?
Is there another one?
You can't pretend
for one second that that is anything other
than exactly what they think. When were you
in Gaza?
End of April for the 1st couple weeks,
and then there's sniper bullets. I had children
that were shot twice. Wait. You're saying that
children in Gaza are being shot by snipers?
Definitively.
I have 2 children that I have photographs
of that were shot so perfectly in their
chest I couldn't put my stethoscope over their
heart more accurately.
And directly on the side of the head
in the same child. No toddler gets shot
twice by mistake by the world's best sniper,
and they're dead center shots.
In fact, more than 20 doctors recently in
Gaza
also told Sunday morning about gunshot wounds to
children.
One American doctor told us he even reviewed
CT scans to confirm what he saw because
he, quote, didn't believe that this many children
could be admitted to a single hospital
with gunshot wounds to the head.
It just every time. I don't even wanna
watch the part where it gets choked up.
It kills me every time.
Here's what Owen Jones had to say. These
are Israeli podcasters supported the extermination of all
Palestinians and said most Israelis support that. If
they're just fringe extremists, attest.
International and Israeli law criminalizes the incitement of
genocide. Where's the arrests?
Obviously, it's not gonna happen.
Now here's an interesting point.
Drew Pablo is one of these openly, you
know, aggressive pro Israel manipulators
on Twitter, in my opinion, or the very
least, is so blinded by their hatred that,
you know, whatever. It's very pro Israel.
He says And th this is a tweet
for somebody going, I don't I don't give
an f about dead Israeli hostages or their
crying mothers. Maybe don't shake your ass on
occupied land next to the concentration camp next
time. What you're referring to is the videos
of them dancing and then getting taken, which
is what happened. And they're all IDF members,
so they are POWs or detainees.
But my I I want there's never, in
my opinion, the right moment to relish in
the death of a human being.
Even now, it's gonna be better for everybody
in the case of, like, a terrorist or
so on and, like, you know, whatever. You
think that. But I just my point is
simply to say that I don't give an
f about cry. Well, they're mothers. They're not
the same point. The point is,
objectively, you can say that's pretty harsh. Right?
That she seems to have a lack of
concern for just Israelis in general because of
the actions of their government. Even though we
can see by and large that seems fair.
Right?
He says, anyone who's able to publicly endorse
the execution of civilian hostages as well as
a massacre of civilians at a music festival
is a massive danger to society. Please make
sure to remember the names and faces of
every single person who has spent the past
year expressing public support for Hamas, war crimes,
and terrorism. And I simply
posted
that video,
which, of course, got zero engagement. Right?
Because it's exactly the same thing. Here he
is going, anybody who could publicly endorse you
mean like this guy? And laughing and jovially
discussing how we could push the button twice
and kill them all?
Apparently, your outrage only goes one way.
When, objectively, you can acknowledge both are you
know, obviously, theirs is far more extreme.
Either way, similar points.
But we need to acknowledge these people don't
care,
arguably, at any of them.
Zachary Foster says the nice Jewish boys, which
is how they're being framed, have issued a
defense of their call for genocide of a
100% of the people in Gaza. Included in
their defense is that other Israelis are also
genocidal.
It says you literally can't make this up.
It says it's also worth noting that many
victims of October 7th share our sentiments. This
is a member of Khaboos Bury saying I
will come back to bury only after the
very last Palestinian is dead. You know, the
location where most of them were killed by
Israeli IDF members in a Hannibal directive. But
he goes, nothing screams nice boy like calling
for the murder of 2,200,000 Palestinians in Gaza.
This is incitement of genocide according to the
1948 genocide convention, but nobody cares. Still on
Twitter. No mark. No and I'm not calling
for censorship. The point is it's not applied
equally.
But I it's funny. I I think I
forgot to grab I had another one. I
guess I didn't I didn't grab everything I
had saved. Point was, apparently, they're also claiming
that this was taken out of context. Right?
They're probably also claiming a self defense, probably
no. It seems seems very very in brand
on brand. Now here is another example, and
I'm I'm I'm gathering a couple more before
I add it to the thread, which I'll
include that you should I mean, look at
how long this is getting. I mean, this
is just a fraction of them. As I
said, how many doctors returning from Gaza telling
you that Israel is deliberately targeting children or
just killing people indiscriminately
do you need to see before something shifts?
4, 8, 12, 16. I mean, look. Look.
Look. This is gonna keep going. There's probably,
like, 20 what is that? 26 now? I
think I was at the one at the
bottom. No. So it'd be
24.
And there's one more. That's the one I
just played, just part of it anyway. Every
one of these doctors is telling you. Oh,
and almost every one of them are not
Palestinians.
Which the only reason that matters is because
people would dismiss that Palestinians would lie, whatever
else, but they'll do that regardless because they
don't wanna hear it. All of them are
telling you these are pea their Israel is
killing indiscriminately
or murdering children.
Here's a new one.
Daniela Mohita shared with us.
Saying you've just returned. You are working at
Nasar Hospital,
in Khan Yunus. Can you speak to what
you saw there and what shocked you the
most?
I think, what shocked me the most this
time was the number of children that,
I saw
and and in fact operated on.
When I'd been,
at the European Guizer Hospital in March,
it was a it was a lot of
children then. But now in August, I would
say that 80% of everyone I treated was
under the age of 16.
Now now this is not just because half
of them are under 18 in Gaza, which
is the truth.
It's because they're targeting children.
This has been shown roundly, well before October
7th. They they talked about the idea that
these snipers were paid. Like, there's a general
on record I talked about years ago that
openly admitted they were ordered to fire on
children. I played that clip of you where
they're shooting a sniper bullet, the child just
standing there. I mean, that might be good
to play again right now just because
let me see.
It pops up real quick. Yep. There it
is.
And this video's been around a million for
a long time. And this was covered by
the Guardian and plenty of others, the Israeli
and it's so funny how even in the
video they act like we can't verify. There
I'll I'll make a point when it comes
up. There's only one entity this could be.
It's very clearly on the other side of
the protected fence where nobody is alive. They've
opened fire on a child standing in the
middle of a field, and they laugh and
cheer. This is well before October 7th. Then
then I'll play this until the video is
done loading. What sorts of injuries would you
see and
what sort of operations would you be carrying
out?
All of the injuries were explosive
related,
and burns. There there was no real other
injury apart from explosion
or a a burn.
So the sorts of things that I was
mainly treating,
were,
sort of 3rd degree burns, 30, 40%.
I saw a lot of, lower limb trauma,
children
losing legs,
losing arms. We had a couple of upper
arm amputees, a lot of facial injuries.
I had a 7 year old that had
most of his nose blown off and, a
big hole in his lip,
a girl that had lost quite a lot
of her,
skin down to the bone on her on
her forehead.
So so what tended to happen is in
the explosions, the children would either get burnt
or shrapnel or or,
that part of the building that had crumbled
would be would be weaponized and held at
them and then inflict a sort of soft
tissue wound with or without an underlying
bony injury.
Have you ever seen anything like this?
No.
Never.
Same answer.
Every single one of them.
Never in their experience, their entire lives. The
other guy, the boss playing first. Been been
all the war zones ever all around the
world, never seen this. The guy literally starts
crying as he's talking about shredded children and
mass children. It's it's unreal.
Every time we go over this, how this
has ever been continued, I mean,
even that it began and and their governments
were supporting, but the fact that we've gone
almost a year, an entire year of not
just
ignoring it, but funding it, supporting it, telling
you that it's the right thing, well, we
all know that's not true. Here's the example
of something that goes back well before October
7th. You tell me they're not cheering about
being at least allowed to murder this child
because he's standing there.
See, that's my point for the podcast is
The Guardian was unable to verify the authenticity.
Really? For you know, from a sniper window,
from on the other side of a protected
fence that's only in Israel that clearly we
know exist? I mean, it is verified. This
is exactly what it is. It's been roundly
discussed and reported on for a long time
now. This is an Israeli sniper aiming at
the other side of the protected fence where
all the protests were happening where they just
murdered the child because they wanted to and
they recorded it.
It says, do you have a bullet in
the barrel? That's okay. That's on him. I
got him.
Just wait. I can't shoot because of the
the wire.
I'm speaking in Hebrew, by the way.
He said there's a small child there. Well,
they know.
How does he always bend over right when
I follow?
Not the pink. I'm on the blue. Why?
This is done.
Yes.
It says, what a video. Son of a
whore. That's what it says.
Oh, mama. Did you film it?
What a movie.
There, go running to evacuate him. Of course,
I filmed it. Think about how
dehumanized these people are monsters.
You not only just murdered a child, but
just the the the complete disregard for these
people's lives
because they're Palestinian.
There's no way around it.
And that's nobody's fault but the Israeli Zionist
government that has made this the reality.
Obviously, I'm not in any way dismissing that
these people are disgusting. But my point is
no long term of why the society is
the way it is. It's because of the
Israeli Zionist government and the people that support
it. Saddam did.
Yeah. It's just that's it kills me.
So here on that note is what Alan
McLeod's highlighting, what the telegraph wrote. As he
says, what kind of psychotic genocidal nonsense is
this?
This is
James Wallace Simmons.
The title, Israel has always been forced to
be too kind
to its enemies.
I mean, I'm speed is unreal.
When it comes to pushing forward victory in
war, the Jewish state has always been held
to a different standard. You're damn right.
It's the standard that nothing they do can
be a crime. The idea that they've been
too kind to their enemies, I mean, it's
insulting to your intelligence.
It the the open even what Israel claims
is not is the opposite of that. It's
unbelievable that anybody could put this forward. Either
this guy is so aggressively blinded by this
story because of whatever interest, whatever influence, whatever
blackmail, or
he's just lying for Zionism.
Here's even CNN.
Now, again, I argue now because it's the
writing's on the wall. These groups that have
always been hiding and covering for Israel recognize
they're losing everything to continue to lie about
it to you. So they start to give
you some. But even then, when it matters,
they're still adhering to the narrative. But here
is CNN reporting to you something, again, that
we've already talked about, that everyone knows about,
that's been out there for a very long
time, that's become a common talking point since
October 7th, and that's why they're finally pointing
to it. Nonetheless,
it's still interesting to see them point to
it at a time when Israel is screaming
all this as blood libel and fake, and
the reality is it's an actual policy. Like
the neighbor procedure, like their human shields, like
everything else, mowing the lawn is the way
they refer to what they do in Gaza,
which
explicitly means indiscriminate bombing. That's what the policy
means. It's openly acknowledged.
The process is an attack to prevent terrorism.
This is the main story.
And in fact, we mow the grass.
The moment will also come when we pull
out the roots.
That must be done.
Well, Israel is simply quote mowing the grass
or the more commonly used term mowing the
lawn in the West Bank.
I've heard this language from Israeli leaders
countless times in the 25 years I've spent
covering this story. Funny how you've never brought
it up before, though. Right?
It shaped a core part of Israel's military
strategy to
Isn't that sort of like what's her name
saying? We all knew about Epstein. Yeah. But
no one said anything till now. Towards Palestinians,
and it's a term regularly used to describe
IDF offensives in
Gaza.
Take a
listen to Naftali
Bennett
speaking
in 2018.
In our neighborhood,
he who does not mow the grass,
the grass mows him.
Well, Bennett was a member of the Knesset
at that time. But 3 years later, he
went on to become prime minister. And in
2014,
2 Israeli experts wrote a paper about the
strategy saying, quote, Israel
simply needs to mow the grass once in
a while to order,
in a while to degrade enemy
capabilities. Now look, it's never clear how much
enemy capabilities
are being degraded if at all.
But what is clear
is this.
West Bank for podcast.
That term
completely
dehumanizes
Palestinians
in the occupied West Bank whose homes have
been turned to rubble. And indeed, the nearly
2,000,000 who call Gaza home. We're talking about
real people, not a plot of grass
to be trimmed.
Recently, Yoav Gallant has opposed prime minister Benjamin
Netanyahu's insistence on prolonging the war in Gaza.
And yet like similar references he's made in
the past, he maintains
this policy underscoring the grim reality.
A suggestion that this idea is systemic.
No catchphrase, no matter how catchy it may
sound to some in Tel Aviv,
will make the catastrophe
unfolding before our eyes acceptable
or any easier
to You know what's funny? Digest. Almost the
way she's re putting this forward, it's almost
insulting in itself. Like, you know, almost makes
you think that it's like, you're lady you're
like 40 years too late. Obviously. I mean,
it's so like, maybe the genocide happening after
that might give you indication that not just
maybe, but absolutely is. I mean, they are
indiscriminately murdering people. 972 Magazine, they Lavender, Habzora,
all these different AI programs. I mean, IDF,
whistleblowers,
everyone has told you the same thing. Doctors
seeing it. But, yeah, it was maybe kind
of. We're not sure.
Bull BS. Almost custard there. Here is Hamas
International. The Israeli military's campaign to significantly expand
a buffer zone
along the eastern perimeter of Gaza should be
investigated as a war crime of wanton destruction
and collective punishment.
One after another. Because it is, they are,
and it has been for a very long
time. And Amnesty and Human Rights Watch have
been calling it out for years, but nobody
cares. It's all subjective until the US government
goes, we'll investigate, and it never does. Here's
Derrick Rose, and this is what we need
to see more of.
And, by the way, it's everywhere. You're just
being lied to about people and ignoring these
things from the corporate media. But there are
Jews all around the world using moments like
this when they know it's not popular in
that room, largely.
Despite the fact that you can see a
lot of the left side of the conversation
at least calling out the genocide, most of
these people still arguably see Israel as the
ally
because that's good duopoly to party illusion policy.
But as Derek says, every time someone breaks
the silence, it becomes harder for the public
and politicians to make excuses to choose ignorance.
This is a Jewish filmmaker, Sarah Friedland,
at the Venice Film Festival.
Here's what she had to say.
American artist working in a time based medium,
I must note, I'm accepting this award on
the 336th day of Israel's genocide in Gaza
and 76 year of occupation.
I believe it is our responsibility
as film workers to use the institutional platforms
through which we work to redress Israel's impunity
on the global stage.
I stand in solidarity with the people of
Palestine and their struggle for liberation.
Now it definitely seems like the crowd's happening,
but, like, my feeling on that is that
there I just you I get the sense
that there's a loud section, but not everybody
in there is really but they don't wanna
be the one not clapping. Like, I just
I mean, my opinion, obviously. But I I
think a lot of people tend to make
this about a partisan thing. It's really not.
As much as the the republicans are desperate
to make it seem like it's only a
left thing to lie about Israel is kinda
how they're framing it. I mean, even if
that's what they think, even if they're doing
this because they think it's a lefty thing,
it doesn't matter. It is the truth. The
facts are undeniable.
It's
there's never been something as clear as this
to see what they're doing on in the
name of the Jewish people when, really, it's
a Zionist attack it's it's a US government
Zionist agenda.
But whatever her reasoning,
what she's saying is the reality. There is
a genocide, and we should care about it.
To to force it into a partisan discussion
is a way to get it mired in
the duopoly, which makes it never change, never
seen, or at least only half seen, which
is the way it always works.
So Ryan Grim
adds a point I didn't want you to
miss. The viral story you may have heard
of an Israeli man ending his own life
because he witnessed a rape on October 7th
has now been publicly
confirmed as a hoax by Israeli media.
Added to the growing list. Credit to the
Israeli reporters who confirmed it. The story didn't
square on its face for lots of reasons,
yet it was shared by many prominent journalists
anyway, Like every other time.
We had a babies and all the rest
of it done with Biden himself. Which I
can guarantee Trump would've repeated if he was
the one in power.
That's my opinion, but you I mean, you
know that's true based on his in blind
support for Israel.
Adam point oh, this just this just the
reporter for channel 13.
Editor of the channel 13 network. And he's
the one telling you that it is a
confirmed hoax.
But you're not gonna hear that reported on
followed up by all the liars on the
corporate media or the liars on the in
mainstream alternative media or all the liars on
the end of on the social media platforms.
Just like all the rest of them. Now
on that point about rape, I'll include this
for you. Here's Pamela Patton, who was used
by Israel, lied about in regard to her
investigation, which explicitly we'll watch the clip. I'm
not gonna play it for you again. It's
about 5 minutes.
Where she openly states, this was not investigation.
We did not conclude fault. We ultimately gathered
what they gave us. And then within that
discovered multiple lies. Ultimately, it did not conclude
anything.
That's what she states. It wasn't even a
real investigation. What we need is a real
investigation.
And then what they do, they go, she
proved it. She said there's no it's all
the evidence we need. They lied. And that
later came out because all of their lies
clearly do because they're desperate.
And then why I'm bringing this up now
oh, wait.
Hold on. Did I mess this up? I'm
just making sure I'm a mess the point.
No. I think okay. I thought I've seen
I'm misremembering. I I thought I had a
secondary point that was gonna come after that.
Anyway, that got then the point ultimately then
becomes
which I was gonna add after the fact,
but the point is that her the the
claim about the rape
right? The whole point of it that the
person even killed them so not only is
it a lie,
but then it ends up being a lie
on top of a lie about a person
killing themselves because they saw the rape, which
ultimately was used, fabricated to make it act
that's a secondary point and then go see
that proves it. Sort of like putting out
false claims, then another network cover those claims,
then going see, they called it. They said
it. Now there's more facts. No. It's just
another network pointing out the same lies. And
that is the reality around this. Oh, here's
what I was gonna come to.
Pamela Patton says sexual violence, especially in detention
only, constitutes grave violation of human rights. So
now it's turned back around. And now what
is she saying? Palestinian detainees are being raped.
Well, look at how that worked out. I
find that ridiculous and hilarious at the same
time. But coming back to more lies, here's
Avi Ocampas.
Lying again.
Surprise, surprise.
Now this is about
people being interrogated
and saying things that they want them to
say.
Here's a Jerusalem Post article. Gaza, quote, journalist
reveals he's actually a terrorist in IDF investigation,
says KAN.
I mean, really, like and again, screenshot,
no more information.
There's a reason for that, which she goes,
is a surprise to nobody.
I simply said, you're a clown and a
genocide supporting dishonest one at that. I hope
you're desperately unhappy as you gaslight for rapists,
torturous, and murderers. Interesting, all the claims you
baselessly threw out right at the beginning, all
of which has been proven false by Israeli
media. And just included some important things. Here's
the Heretz article from 2022, tortured in the
confession. 2 Palestinians recount hellish interrogation
for heretz. B'as elam, Israeli platform, torture during
interrogations, testimony of Palestinian detainees, testimony of interrogators
who admit that they tortured them. Here's, I
24. Israeli court says Shin Bet pressured man
to give false testimony. This is all Israeli
media, by the way. Here's,
dotcomocracy
now. Israel accused of running torture camps as
video emerges of soldiers raping Palestinian prisoners.
Point,
guys.
It's all over the place. And here's all
the links that I've and and more, by
the way. Here's Amnesty International.
Human Rights Watch. All of which giving you
the same information.
Long oh, I think I've got it right
here.
I'll include all these for you.
There's Human Rights Watch, interrogation of Palestinian prisoner
prison from occupied territories.
Is, amnesty,
horrifying cases of torture, degrading treatment of detainees,
tortured
confessions.
Torture torture during interrogations, testimonies, what I showed
you. And then here's just a by the
way, just a running
confession through torture IDF. I mean, it's unreal.
How many you could find?
But it doesn't matter. Right? Because this works
for us.
We kidnapped a guy, made him say what
we wanted, and then put it out there
as, see, that's what all the journalists are
that we've been murdering with no justification.
Anyone surprised?
These people are embarrassing. It doesn't I mean,
they're they're so desperate that they'll put out
anything they want to share you to push
a narrative. And here's the point about that
coming back around. I do have Klompas who's
been pushing the rape lie from the beginning.
The very person they're pointing to is now
coming around and admitting that, yes, they're raising
people in detentions in Israeli prisons.
Here is Arson Ostrovsky, one of the other
manipulators. He's, apparently
a fake international human rights lawyer. I say
that because how could he be with what
he keeps pushing? And I guess you can
go through the classes and not or the
school and not actually be a human rights
person.
But here's another post. IDF detains terror suspect
embedded with UN team.
Same point. And he says shocked. Just shocked
that Palestinian terrorists will be embedded with the
UN team. Nothing about this is proven other
than Israel
says they were that. You know, the same
Israel that said all the other things that
we just proven to be lies.
Again, I don't know what else to call
this but a desperation.
But here's where this gets really disgusting. This
was on September 9th. You know what they're
using this to hide? The fact that they
straight up murdered about 11, I think, UNRWA
employees.
Now let's not forget that nobody has yet
proven, because it doesn't exist, that UNRA 1
was, working with them on October 7th or
that they evolved with Hamas at all. Even
the US and Canada have come out and
said, you have yet to present any evidence.
And then nothing has happened since.
That's where we are. Don't forget that. I
think I can have one at least come
up here.
Yeah. There's one. I mean, there's I've I've
shown you so many. Israel yet to provide
evidence to back unreclaimed. I mean, it's everywhere,
guys, and they just keep lying about
it. Include that for you.
The reason I bring it up is because
here's what's going on now. Oh, one more
point. So this is I am Palestine.
And this goes back to the point about,
like, you know, WhatsApp, Telegram, these kind of
things. But in this case, it's really just
phone calls using the same way. My point
is using all these things to sort of
pinpoint locations and use that to murder, abuse.
Israeli forces have been using deceptive tactics by
calling Palestinian civilians,
mainly women, under the guise of international aid
organizations. So now we've seen them dress up
like aid organizations and murder people. We've seen
them use their cars with US help to
drive in and murder people. We've seen them
murder and assassinate anybody going to try to
get the aid from trucks they're manipulating. Now
we have them calling, pretending to be aid
workers, then killing them for doing so. For
answering, apparently.
After extracting their personal information, they target these
civilians in air strikes.
This is gonna say, journalists on the ground,
breaking this down for you. Here,
Saint Zionist Observer, breaking this down from another
post from,
this was what's a journalist on the ground
as well. We've talked about it before. Abu
Baker Abed.
11 and this this is on September 11th,
mind you. Surprise, surprise.
11
under workers have been killed. And an airstrike
on an un rescool or at least adjacent
to it at this,
refugee camp.
There's just not even like an effort to
make, like, say they were all terror. That's
why the other story just becomes, well, there
was a terrorist around
because we said so.
Point is IDF apparently targeted
very specifically
a meeting of teachers
working to figure out a way to provide
education to children in Gaza this year.
They literally having a meeting about how to
assemble have some semblance of education.
I guarantee they got wind of that murder
these people. That's my opinion. But not the
murdering. Why they did it. Either way, they
murdered these teachers.
Here they are.
They're they're gonna make they're gonna do their
best to try to tell you they're terrorists,
like always. But 99% of the time and
I'm really just whether they're Hamas or not
is the point. But 99% of the time,
they've been shown to be wrong. Or lying.
Or torturing people to say what they want.
And let's not forget, that happened right in
the beginning. Remember when they had all these
people in whatever clothes whatever those weird rags
they were wearing? They were shaking and they
were like, tell me what happened. And we
raped everybody and and we killed all the
children.
And turns out all those were false because
their own media proved it to be false.
Everything they were saying, beheading babies, they made
them say all this on the record, and
now we know that's not true. And yet
we can't piece together that they might be
doing it again?
Mohammed says Israeli soldiers in Gaza surrounded a
UN convoy with tanks,
rammed it with a bulldozer, dumped dirt on
one of the UN vehicles to trap the
staff inside. The UN staff were on their
way to help administer polio vaccines. And I've
seen this as well. This is crazy to
me because ultimately,
probably in their best benefit to not get
these dangerous shots. But here's what's crazy is
Israel's pointing at that as how they're helping
everybody. And yet, then they let them go
in and they burden them for trying.
It's very interesting. Now, the details here, you
can read for yourself.
I'm I'm just now realizing I'm almost in
4 hours, and I have a whole bunch
I wanna get through, so I'm a have
to save some for tomorrow. But here, of
course, is what they end up with. This
is the editor, former editor of the Jerusalem
Post.
He says,
Israel has confirmed, which means
they're saying Israel said, that's all it means,
the identities of 9 Hamas terrorists killed in
the airstrike that targets a command. Okay. Here
what's hilarious about this.
So if you knew they were terrorists, why
wouldn't you make this the case publicly, like,
make it a legal case? No. What they're
telling you is we bombed an area, and
then afterward, we're like, oh, look. We killed
some terrorists,
which, by the way, is also not even
the case.
There's no there's show me where that's confirmed.
What he's saying is Israel said there's not
a public statement, there's not some kind of
evidence database. They just go, we killed bad
guys. And the US goes, oh, they killed
bad guys. They're investigating. We raised the issue.
Targeted a command and control post, he says,
inside, oh, guess what, of a school.
Guess what, though? You'll never find any evidence
of that because it doesn't exist. They're lying
to you.
And here's and Gutierrez simply saying what's happening
in God is unacceptable.
A school turned shelter for 12,000
people hit by air strikes.
Because that's actually what's happening. And but the
reason I'm saying that so definitively because the
doctors on the ground who are Palestinian, who
are from London, who are from Germany, all
over the world have been telling you this
non stop.
They're just murdering people. We're in the hospital.
There's no Hamas. I mean, here, I'll play
this one. This one's important because it's the
same thing from every single one of them
if you just care to listen. Every single
part of the hospital has been destroyed.
The whole infrastructure
of the hospital has been destroyed. When I
spoke to Marwan yesterday, he told me there
were a 107 patients
sitting on the hospital, 60 medical staff. God
only knows what has happened to them. I
think we've seen some of the pictures.
Surgeons I know have been executed,
in the last 48 hours there.
Bodies have been discovered
in the last 12 to 24 hours with
who have been handcuffed
with their arms behind their back,
and so there is no doubt at all
that that multiple health care workers have been
executed there in the last few days. Ex
you believe executed by whom, doctor? By the
Israeli Defense Force.
Why would they seek to execute surgeons and
medical professionals?
Well, they've been doing it since October 7th.
Over 450
health care workers have been killed. Friends of
mine that I have worked with over the
years.
Many have been abducted as well, and nothing
has been heard of them since. So there
is no doubt in my mind, and I've
I I I I can bear witness from
this from my time at Al Aqsa Hospital
and from talking to people that there's been
direct targeting of the health
care system in
Gaza, direct targeting of hospitals,
and multiple killings of health care workers. Any
death is tragic, but this is not and
I say again, anyone dying in any sense.
So this is not, and please don't be
upset by this expression, collateral damage. This is
specifically targeted, you're saying, medical professionals
by the IDF to be taken off and
executed is your belief?
Most certainly. That is my belief.
Have you at any time seen anything that
leads you would lead you to believe that
there had been terrorists who were hiding in
the hospital. Without exception, every single one has
responded to say they have never witnessed any
Hamas militants in the hospitals they have worked
in.
So here's something funny, by the way, guys.
It looks like I might they I've got
one of the chats up with YouTube,
and everyone's like, oh my god. You froze.
Something changed. It ended. No. We're still live.
This is I've this is the first I've
seen this. YouTube just ended my stream. The
video is still there.
Just ended it.
Apparently, you can watch it all right now
up until the last 20 seconds. Now it's
done.
That's not by accident. I'm telling you. That's
something that has to be initiated. YouTube just
decided to end my stream. They didn't delete
the video. They just cut me off at
a point when we're talking about something important.
I find that just unbelievably obvious. Very, very
clear what's going on today, guys. I'm actually
gonna check real quick. Let me see the
the home page here and see if it's
even that's still there. Yeah. It's it's still
there.
It's crazy to me. Anyway, let's continue. Which
which I I posted in the chat, this
is why you shouldn't be watching on YouTube
because YouTube is ridiculous. And either but I
get the, you know, people like their community
and then point is that's going to happen
in a lot of these platforms. But let's
go back to this.
Let's talk about the ceasefire conversation.
And this is going you know, all this
comes back to the same dishonest tactics. They're
just you're being blatantly lied to by the
Israeli government, and your governments are blindly allowing
this.
Netanyahu rejects US assessment on ceasefire,
says there's not a deal in the making.
Like, how is that even possible? Now this
was written on 5th. So this is, again,
this is where I'm playing catch up from
being, you know, the last so many days
and and roller week where I haven't been
doing as much as I want. This is
supposed to 12th today.
The point is this narrative never stops. It's
been going on for, what, 8, 9 months?
Just constantly keep kicking it down the road
and they're blaming Hamas? It's undeniable. Even in
Israeli circles, more than anywhere in the world
apparently, that Israel is the one making sure
it doesn't happen Over and over and over,
and that's why they're pushing back on their
own government at this point. I'll include the
article about how it it it Netanyahu is
systematically
foiling talks. This this is from this the
the,
was it the, the 10th July?
Families of American citizens held in Gaza are
now asking the US directly, cut a deal.
Circumvent Israel. Because no clearly, we could tell
that it's only Israel that's causing the problem.
So now we're seeing that most Americans,
almost all Israelis, whether they like want Palestinians
to live or not, which is the majority
that they don't, but they still are arguing
to make take a deal because they just
want their families back. And if just that
alone wouldn't be enough, they can tell and
have publicly stated Israel is
some of them killing them, genuinely saying they're
trying to kill our families, but other rest
of them are just saying you don't care
about them. You're bombing everywhere. You're starving everywhere.
You're doing you're it's you're killing our families.
They don't care about them, and so they
see it and they're calling it out. So
the it's just so incredible. You can see
more than I've ever been ever it's ever
been possible
to see what these governments really are. They're
on display. They know that they're taking stances
that most of the world doesn't like, And
why they're keeping for going forward is the
question you should be asking. What influence over
them? Are they really this evil? Are they
being blackmailed?
Who knows?
But we need to start standing up and
calling this out.
Now here's what Beth Sullivan had to say.
Again, leading human rights group in Israel on
September 5th.
The families of Israel,
they see this.
I now give the floor to miss Yuli
Novak.
Thank you.
Members of the Security Council, it is an
honor to address the Security Council today,
and I thank the Slovenian presidency for the
invitation to talk to you about the state
of human rights in Israel Palestine.
On Sunday, we woke up to the news
that 6 Israeli hostages
were executed by Hamas as Israeli forces came
close.
Another 6
added to the tens of thousands of people
in this land who should not have died
over the past year.
During this week, 100 of 1000 of Israelis
have taken to the streets.
They feel angry, desperate, and betrayed by their
government.
They have understood that the Israeli government does
not want to retain the hostages
in the deal, but to continue the word
indefinitely.
To understand the Israeli government's criminal conduct over
the last 11 months,
you must you you have to understand the
overall goal of this regime.
Since Israel was founded, its guiding logic has
been to promote Jewish supremacy
over the entire territory under its control.
The current government's guidelines state that, quote,
the Jewish people have an exclusive and unquestionable
right to all parts of the land of
Israel.
In the criminal Hamas led attack on October
7th,
1200 Israelis were killed and
250 taken hostages.
Since that day, I and every Israeli I
know have been living in deep fear.
Our government is cynically exploiting our collective trauma
to violently advance its project of cementing Israel
control over the entire land. Listen up. To
do that, it is waging war on the
entire Palestinian people,
committing war crimes almost daily.
In Gaza, this Just so it's not and
so it's hopefully clear, that's an this is
an Israeli speaking.
Right? So and and you could argue that
she's misrepresenting it, but on behalf of the
Israeli people is taking the form of expulsion,
starvation,
killing, and destruction
on an unprecedented
scale.
This goes beyond beyond revenge.
Israel is using the opportunity
to promote an ideological
agenda,
making Gaza
inhabitable.
As this council has been informed repeatedly,
a vast part of Gaza's homes and infrastructures
have been completely destroyed.
By driving Palestinians
out of entire areas and displacing millions,
Israel is laying the groundwork
for long term control
of Gaza
that could lead to reestablishing
Israeli settlements there. That is the point. In
the West Bank, including East Jerusalem,
the government is exploiting the c circumstances
to create irreversible changes.
Since October, Israeli forces have killed 640
Palestinians there, including at least 140
minors.
Settlers are attacking Palestinians and carrying out pogroms
in broad daylight
with support of the gun of from the
government.
They have so far managed to drive 19
Palestinian community out of their homes.
Wow. And recently, the military,
launched a huge operation I mean, as we're
listening to this, think about how it's possible
that this could be going on with Israelis
speaking up about what their government's doing, and
yet nothing's happening.
This is in the West Bank she's talking
about. They're raping and burning down houses and
burning people alive. That's not hyperbole. It's all
been reported on.
Displacing, which has always been illegal, build and
demolishing homes.
Right? I mean, it's just right there in
front of us, and they're pleading with the
world, and yet the world the the actual
people just look away.
The governments, that is.
That needs to show you what the problem
is as I'm highlighting my entire career,
not just one or the other guys, but
the government government
in general. To damage infrastructure
that serves 100 of thousands of people in
the northern West Bank.
The international community did not stop Israel's criminal
policy of massive harm to civilians in Gaza.
Now this cruel policy is spilling over into
the West Bank.
The war on Palestinians is also happening inside
prisons.
Since October, Israel has arrested thousands of Palestinians
and held them in inhumane conditions.
Last month, we at B'Tselem published a report
called welcome to hell. It shows a shocking
pattern of abuse that amounts to torture.
The government of Israel has used the war
to turn Israeli prisons into a network of
torture camps for Palestinians.
This violence is possible because Israel has enjoyed
impunity for decades.
As long as this impunity continues, the killing
and destruction
will continue and expand,
and fear will continue to rule the land.
The international community has failed its duty to
protect civilians.
4 UN Security Council resolutions on the Gaza
conflict did not lead to its a lasting
ceasefire or free the hostages.
The risk of regional escalation has grown.
Diplomatic efforts did not stop the mass killing
of civilians and the humanitarian disaster in Gaza.
The council must acknowledge this failure
and take effective action
to compel Israel and Hamas
to immediately and permanently
cease all hostilities.
But de escalation is only the first step.
It is time for the council to address
the opinion of the International Court of Justice
on the illegality of Israel's entire occupation and
settle settlement project.
Every day that this council does not act
on the court's call to end the occupation
and apartheid
is another day you are abandoning
us,
the people of this land, who are suffering
and dying in tens of 1,000
needlessly
under a cruel and unjust apartheid regime.
Thank you.
It's powerful.
Now, by the way,
this is what ultimately happened. I just looked
back so the video is still technically there
because that's not the video. So weirdly enough,
they gave me a strike for another video
while we were live, and I just ended
the video because of that. That doesn't even
make sense. It has never been the way
it worked before. But this is about this
is the video,
Israel invades West Bank, curfew in Massachusetts due
to suspect mosquito EE risk and the monkeypox
deception. They seem to be very clearly still
on guard about the whole COVID 19 medical
freedom point, but that's that video is from
a week and a half ago. It's ridiculous.
Anyway, so
wrapping up this segment, I wanna highlight this.
Here's The Guardian from September 12th, today.
Aid not reaching Gaza, says relief groups, as
more than a1000000 go without food. There's just
no way to highlight. This is everything we've
been warning about and it's only getting worse
day by day.
This has lost its focus because we're I
mean, they're just straight up demolishing children live
TV now. The end the point is people
are still starving to death right now. They
are actively continuing the starvation tactics as they
and then as the US pretends like we
have to wait one more week or one
more day or one more we'll have to
wait for this tomorrow, more people die. More
starvation. Just kicking the can down the road.
They know what's going on.
The only reason this is happening is because
of Israel. And they're openly saying this at
this point. There's and they'll still lie about
it, but every point in the media, including
Israeli media, is being pretty open about the
reality of what's going on. And yet, weirdly,
it just keeps going.
Sadly, here's another child. I've seen more starving
to death children than I've ever, I mean,
thought I would see ever in my life.
Palestinian child, Azam, from Northern Gaza, passed away
due to malnutrition
and lack of medical treatment as a result
of the ongoing Israeli aggression and blockade on
Gaza.
Here's Matt Miller.
It's time to fire a ceasefire deal, he
says. You know, the deal that Netanyahu just
literally said isn't even real.
Make sense of that for me. That's recent.
Netanyahu just said that. There's no deal in
the making. But here's Matt Miller going, well,
it's time to make a deal. Hamas better
step up.
Guys, this is schizophrenic.
We all I I don't even know how
to address this anymore. Like, we it's just
this the only problem in this is that
this government is as well as the people
that are supporting it,
just clearly won't stop. There is nothing that
will cross this line.
Here's what he said.
Sunday morning in Israel, the parents of Hirsch
Goldberg, Poland
received the devastating news that they would never
see their son again. Yeah. Okay. So it's
about the Israeli hostage or rather the Israeli
detainee because he was an IDF member who
was killed, which is sad.
Which there's a fair argument to make that
this was killed by the IDF. Like, like
pretty much every other one that's been taken
back or is killed in Gaza, by the
way. Which is what what Hamas suggests and
what others have said to say, but who
knows? The point is, it's weird how what
about all the other deaths that have been
happening, including Americans, which we'll get to next?
Weird how they don't care about that. So
let's recognize that this isn't about whether you're
American or not, it's whether there's an Israeli
American or Israeli attached to that discussion.
That's simply the reality.
They're only talking about this because it's politically
important to them. They don't care about any
of them, I would argue.
But the bottom line is that they're ignoring
so much death and suffering while out jumping
up in outrage about anything that happens in
regard to Israel.
Even if that might have actually been the
idea that was responsible. And they've done this
many times in cases where we can now
prove that. After he was murdered by Hamas.
Which again, just to be clear, is simply
the narrative because Israel said.
Now that could be the case. It wouldn't
surprise me. But the reality is they've been
caught lying about 90% of this, so him
simply repeating what they said
should bother you. On top of the fact
that remember when he said that they're probably
being raped over there, and he was got
now that's been that's clearly a lie, but
he suggested that because he was being driven
to do so, because they're liars.
John Polin and Rachel Goldberg Polin,
the families of 5 other hostages also found
out on Sunday that they too had lost
their loved ones forever.
We grieve for all of them, and we
demand justice
for all of them.
Secretary Blinken said this weekend,
Hirsch Goldberg Polin is an American hero.
The secretary got to know Hirsch's parents over
the past 11 months, and
like so many Americans who met them or
who saw them in one of their many
television appearances advocating for the release of their
son.
He heard from them time and time again
what And by the way, in many cases,
they're advocating for Israel to take whatever deal
was offered. They love to frame that as
advocating for Hamas to release the hostages, like
it's on them to just do what they're
asked.
No. They were saying Israel, take a deal.
You're gonna kill our children, that's what happened.
A special human being Hirsch was.
Hirsch was a young man known by his
family, by his friends for his kindness. I
mean, I mean, I'm not trying to doubt,
like, this is sad reality for anyone to
be killed.
But doesn't it seem strange?
Do you realize how many Americans have died
just since October 7th forward? And I'm talking
about not just Palestinian Americans, but Americans. There's
been 3 stories I've shown you where there's
been a man one from Chicago, I believe,
who was dying in Gaza, was going, Where's
my government? Nobody spoke up for them.
Just weird, like, how Matt you think Matt
Miller knows this guy? He was a special
person with all these great qualities? Have you
met him,
Matt? So this is propaganda then. And it
feels very strange coming from an American representative
while they have yet to acknowledge all of
the other Americans that were killed by Israel,
which may include this one.
For being a gentle soul who loved traveling,
who loved music.
And, of course, he was attending a music
festival on October 7th when it was attacked
by Hamas. You know, the one that they
moved to be right in line of where
they thought that might happen. And he witnessed
the murder of so many citizens, not just
of Israel,
but of countries around the world.
The world also knows about the courage that
Hirsch demonstrated that day,
how he took refuge in a shelter with
others who were attend You know, again, you
know, what we've been told. I'm sure pretty
sure we can all just trust that what
Israel laid out for us is absolutely the
truth. Right? I mean, the point is obvious.
This is this is unnerving to watch this.
Not because we should that we shouldn't care
about the individual but because of how this
is very selective.
And let's not pretend like Matt has some
kind of special
insight to who these he's reading what was
handed to him. That in and of itself
should be creepy.
Why is it so emotional?
Because he's trying to emotionally manipulate you.
But let's talk about this.
Right?
Let's talk about
this American.
Censored man on the sex of the 6th,
which by the way this
was posted
on the 3rd.
So, here's 3 days later. IDF shot a
a American activist in the head, in the
West Bank. In the West Bank, not Gaza.
You probably I'm sure you've heard this. It's
been this story been roundly discussed, and we've
already seen it come to apparent conclusion.
Oops. It was a ricochet. Our bad.
That's what they're saying.
Israeli soldier fatally shot an American woman at
the West Bank protest, a witness says.
Reg Sarah points out the illegal occupation that
Starmer and Sunak were both defending
just shot another journalist dead.
No. Sorry. And this is this is the
American activist shot in the occupied West Bank.
This is, after the
where was here we go.
BBC coverage, the magic bullet from 1963.
He's making references. The point is simply to
highlight that, you know, everyone around the world
is highlighting this. Even in even the UK.
Saying, they just killed an American.
Which, again, to be clear, in no way
am I suggesting that should matter anymore than
any of the rest of them. But from
an American government perspective, it's interesting that you
will freak out about anything or make this
huge
statement about how a great person he was,
about an Israeli American who is an a
detainee, who is an IDF member, who has
there's all the overlaps that would come with.
The legal reality of how a resistance would
be able to take or kill that person.
Not saying it's a good thing, but the
reality is that is a legal act under
the Fortiva Convention in occupied territories,
as you heard the expert highlighting.
Because that would be a military target, you
understand. Especially since the reality is these caboots
they were invading were in fact on occupied
Gaza land. The human shields, if you will.
Here's what Owen Jones had to say. This
is the image of the American activist shot
in the head
by a sniper, just like all the children
we were just highlighting.
When a US citizen is killed by Hamas,
you will hear Biden and Harris, the Hemet
League, denouncing the evils of the killers, as
well as anybody else, Trump and RFK and
all the rest of them. There will be
no such speech denouncing Israel after the soldiers
murdered this woman.
I don't wanna mispronounce her name.
Washington Post, US concludes
unintentional Israeli fire likely killed American journalist.
Makes your skin crawl.
Lincoln says,
oh, and this
this is now, just so we're clear, that
is the reality of what it currently is.
We'll get to that, but this looks like
an older example of the same exact thing.
Lincoln says, any actions we take are driven
by the facts. You know, unless it's in
our interest, of course. Right?
But when the facts point is real, then
take no action, is what she writes and
I agree.
Here is
both Blinken and Patel.
I'll let them speak for themselves.
Just it just makes me sick the way
these people handle these situations.
People looking at this incident have pointed out
the,
what seems to be a double standard or
or a different treatment of this death, you
know, death of a of an American citizen,
at the hands of Israeli forces to,
you know, other incidents where Americans have been
killed in the conflicts in the Middle East.
And this is the whole point. There's no
cemetery.
Well, yeah, there is. It's called the law.
The law applies equally to everybody. That's what
we've always been taught, right?
Even though we know that's not the reality
of the way the world works because of
people like this. But it is what we're
told. So when they say there's no symmetry,
what are they actually saying? That they're they
should be treated differently. There's no way to
misunderstand that. And this is an example of
that.
Or or injured. You know? Obviously, there are
there are different circumstances, but the the president
in, in relation to to
some an attack by Iranian proxies
earlier this year said, if you harm an
American, we will respond.
Does that apply in this case, or are
we talking about a different standard? Well, it's
clear to anybody, Simon, that what the president
was talking about in that context was a,
terrorist attack. Ah, okay. So it's not a
terrorist because we did it. See the difference?
But if you do the exact same thing,
you're a terrorist, therefore, that's bad.
That's what he just said. I mean, it
the the bottom line is that we just
don't see ourselves as terrorists, therefore, it's not
the same thing.
These people are that's that's embarrassing.
Or a direct attack,
from a state or non state actor that,
intentionally,
was conducted to And there's the point they're
trying to use, which means he's already got
his talking points. It was unintentional.
It wasn't. I mean, it's like everyone, like,
we'll show you, like, sure Shireen Abu Akleh,
which they got caught lying about, and they
first said the same thing. Accident. In fact,
what they first said was Hamas, then they
said, no, it was somebody else. Maybe p
p I j. No. Then it maybe one
after another. Lie lie lie lie until eventually
they had to admit that it was accident,
which but it wasn't an accident. They murdered
her. And people in right in front of
everybody watched it happen just like this one
too. Put Americans or American citizens in harm's
way.
And, of course, when it comes to the
protection of our citizens and our personnel,
and if they are targeted, we, of course,
will take, appropriate action.
In as it In in other words, not
at all ever is what he means by
that. That may sound confusing, but that's what
he means. Relates to the events on Friday.
We are still gathering information as it relates
to what transpired,
what happened,
and as tragic as as it is, and
it is tragic. It is tragic anytime,
anybody loses their life, any civilian,
loses their life, for people Unless they're Palestinians,
of course. Right? Who work at this department,
it is, especially tragic when an American citizen,
loses their life. But we still don't,
know,
with full certainty,
what transpired and what happened, and that's why
we are,
working to,
get as much information as we can as
well as encouraging our partners in Israel to,
quickly and robustly Investigate themselves because that always
makes sense. Conduct and conclude their process and
make their findings,
public so we can, understand,
what happened. And should whatever
happened,
deem that Yeah. There be appropriate accountability,
the United States would, certainly, expect that as
well.
Go ahead and say this guy knows he
like, that's my sense anyway.
He's usually pretty well spoken, but when he
when he's I think when he knows he's
lying, you get the like every other sentence,
every other word. Before. It is it is,
of course, tragic when any,
civilian loses their life. You already said that.
You already said that. You're circling back. And
to know what you said, Simon, which is
that each circumstance is different,
and it is,
really important to, That's not what he said,
by the way. He was musing that to
make the point that you're inconsistent.
So he he loves to the guy does
this all the time. But at the end
of the day, all you're acknowledging is the
laws apply differently. We're not terrorists, therefore, it
doesn't apply.
But it's exactly what happened by all the
evidence on the ground and the idea that
this was a person I mean, even if
you look at the conversation on Twitter,
even from, like, the high level individuals we're
highlighting,
not some random person, but like these if
Eva Klompas type characters, not to say she
said this, probably did for all I know,
but people like that. That that level,
in some cases, he's really government adjacent or
even in the government are openly going, well,
she was throwing rocks.
So good. Good riddance. And I'm in fact,
I'm think I don't wanna get let the
cat out of the bag. There's an American
Trump supported politician who said that explicitly.
So wait a minute. Was it an accident
ricochet? Or was she throwing rocks and she
was shot? And that's good.
An Israeli bullet?
I I am not, going to get ahead
of,
a process here, Simon.
Let's see. He asked directly if you have
doubts, not what the process might find.
But you see my point is just they
they use these couch arguments. If I was
in this room, of course, they know that
if they push back at the wrong time,
they'll never be let back in. That's access
journalism for you.
The bottom line is that do you have
doubts?
That's a point blank question about what you
currently know, not even definitive,
but he can't answer. You know why? Because
they can't say that. Obviously, there has been
a great deal of open source and public
reporting and eyewitness reporting about, what transpired on
Otherwise known as evidence. Friday,
and I certainly will let those comments and
those reportings be, but, What does that mean?
I'll certainly let them be?
One of the worst displays I've seen from
this guy. That doesn't even make sense. So
that in a way you're saying you'll ignore
them or you'll let them be be a
part of the conversation?
I'll let them be.
Moving on. I think most important is to
let this process play out for the You
know, the investigation of themselves, which will ultimately
amount into we found ourselves not guilty like
every other time, but let it play out
6 months later, we'll maybe talk about it
again. Facts to be gathered and for those,
to come to light.
And and I will just leave it at
that.
Sad. Ask you,
about a couple of aspects of the Middle
East. The Israel, the Israel Defense Forces,
just a moment ago released, an investigation or
released a preliminary some preliminary findings to the
death of an American citizen,
miss Eisnor,
any.
Could you say they said that she was
killed, most likely by Israeli fire, but, but
unintentionally.
Are you confident with that assessment?
Does United States wanna see anything further? Are
you confident with the assessment that was unintentional?
And what what more do you want Israel
to do? Could there be repercussions?
With regard to
the tragic killing of Isenor,
I think what we saw this,
investigation
is it seems to show what
eyewitnesses have said and made clear
that
her killing
was both
unprovoked and unjustified.
No one
no one should be shot and killed for
attending a protest.
Unless that's when US does it all the
time and blames it on the country. You
know? No one should have to put their
life at risk
just for freely expressing their views.
Despite you know, I could make a 1,000
examples right there. It's just funny how they're
such hypocrites. Our judgment Israeli security forces
need to make some fundamental changes
in the way that they operate in the
West Bank,
including changes to their rules of engagement. Oh,
changes. Right? So not like you're gonna go
to jail because you just murder people and
it's a war crime, but, you know, we
disagree with that. So give me some differences
and at least present differently and we'll ignore.
Like, that's not how you treat criminals. You
don't go, hey. I don't like that murder.
Change up your stance.
It's not what you do. You go, you
killed a guy. You're going to prison. But
they don't do that because they don't hold
themselves accountable.
We've long seen reports of the security forces
looking the other way
when extremist settlers use violence against,
Palestinians. You mean the ones that have been
ordered to do it by the Israeli government
that you never address? These people are disgusting
liars.
We've seen to realize the reason even that
this is what I was gonna say at
the end of this. The point is that
this is different. Right? He's saying something, and
what you need to recognize
is that this shows you how much they're
failing.
They're desperate. They've lost control of the narrative.
This is him saying something you've won't change
from you. We need to see action. No.
It's just the settlers. This is important
because
they're gonna go after him. Israel doesn't want
any of this stuff to be said, but
at the end of the day, he's still
throwing them a bone, not holding them accountable.
Reports
of excessive force by Israeli security forces against,
Palestinians.
And now we have
the 2nd
American citizen
killed at the hands of Israeli security forces.
Seriously? The second?
Other than the 600 Americans that were already
in Gaza, God knows how many have been
killed. I guarantee a lot of them.
It's amazing how they only care about certain
the Americans that get publicity,
whether they want them to or not, the
ones that get noticed, that was the we
care.
No. You don't.
It's not acceptable.
It has to change. And we'll be making
that clear to
the senior most members of the Israeli government.
Oh, I'm sure. We're looking Right. Make it
clear that we want you to do something
different, but no accountability for the crimes that
you've racked up over the last year. Carefully
at the,
results of this,
investigation,
but even Again, and that's the point. And
then the investigation concludes that it's unintentional, and
then they never bring it up again despite
all of your sort of big talk here.
On an initial read and even accepting it
at face value.
It's clear that just be here to see,
like, seem very uncomfortable whenever he's doing this.
There are serious issues that need to be
dealt with. It's rocking back and forth. Insist
that they'd be dealt with. It's like he's
a hostage.
Right? I mean, just my opinion.
Now I'm gonna unfortunately have to rapidly wrap
this up for a couple reasons, but really
just long in general.
I mean, and I damn it, man. I
swear I do this every time with this.
I mean, I already went over a lot
of what I wanna talk about, but the
la this last part in general was focused
on the West Bank in general. I'm gonna
play some of it, but I'm gonna make
sure we try to get to it tomorrow
or the next day. They accidentally shot her
in the head, she says, just like they
accidentally shot Shereen Abuah Clay in the head.
Accidentally,
crushed Rachel Corey with a bulldozer, accidentally
targeted Mark WCK cars 3 times. It's the
same story. Or the flower massacre.
Every time they get away with this.
Same story. Global outrage, Israel investigates itself, says
oops.
You you can we've we've wrote about this
many times. This one is the one of
the I think the one of the concluding
ones from 2022, September. Israel by the way,
September 10th.
Israel covered up the murder of Shireen Abu
Klee with US help. I mean, it really
is embarrassing. There's links to each stage of
it.
Hamas did it. Or rather, it was one
of them. Or then this happened. Then, no,
it was like this. Or no, it was,
it wasn't a bullet at all. Something fell.
I mean, I I'm just kind of ad
libbing here. The point is you can see
how it went from they did it. No.
We No. But it wasn't them. It was
a different group. Oh, wait. No. Maybe it
was us, but it was an accident. Oh,
no. It was us, but it ricocheted. Every
It's the same story. And then in case
you missed it, here's where the IDF attacked
while they were in the funeral procession.
Yeah. That's the end of the story. Period.
Nothing else. They just started hitting the legs
of the people carrying the coffin because, you
know, freedom and democracy.
It's just blatant. They blatant they just wanted
them to because they were angry, because they
got caught. That's what I think. Either way,
these weren't armed people. These were Palestinians carrying
a coffin. And they came out in force
and started beating them as they walked along.
Good on them. They didn't let it fall,
but it almost did. They were trying to
make them drop the coffin. That's it. End
of story. They walked away. It was over.
Good times. Freedom.
Gosh. May turn your stomach, man. Matt Lee
points out, so the official explanation is that
she and other protesters were hurling rocks,
causing an Israeli sniper who was 2 football
fields away for fear of the safety of
fire or for fear of his life. That's
the as always, defending yourself.
Accidentally executing the wrong political dissident.
I mean, he says the Hasbro is bad.
I agree.
You're gonna tell me this sniper felt scared
to have to shoot this person throwing rocks
200 yards away? Or that you even thought
the IDF was at risk in their riot
gear?
Throwing rocks? No. This is about murdering people
and then getting caught and then having an
explanation.
Here
is representative Randy Fine. And I've shown you
this more than once.
What he is.
And look, even Twitter has this not removed,
not censored, which I'm not asking for, but
the inconsistency with somebody going free Palestine censored.
Just limit his post. Why? Because they don't
really want people to see it. That's what
I argue. Because it's blatant.
Throw rocks, get shot.
One less Muslim terrorist.
You realize that no one's saying she's a
terrorist. Not even the Israeli government. They're simply
saying she was a protester throwing rocks.
But Randy Fine, who was an absolute lunatic
Zionist, who, by the way, was endorsed by
Donald Trump,
Randy is a fine MAGA Warrior who will
stand up to anyone. And this is a
screenshot, but I've already shown the actual one
on the show last time from Truth Social.
I said, how and here here's what he
shows by the way.
Of course, Visegrad.
The classic ridiculous propaganda platform pretending to be
a journalist who says, the Turkish woman with
US citizenship citizenship was shot to death in
the West Bank by the Israeli army. It
says the woman had joined a mob of
locals and foreign activists that were peddling rocks.
Okay. I didn't see the word Hamas or
terrorist in there anywhere, but the point is,
oh, Palestinian terrorist
according to Randy Fine. Well, here's
it says, get throw rocks, get shot, one
less Muslim terrorist.
My god.
Fire away, he says.
This is an American, guys.
And I said, how exactly is it America
First or MAGA to praise the killing of
an American citizen killed by Israel?
And no, she was not a Muslim terrorist,
but this MAGA leader is happy to tell
you that he supports her killing and the
government who just murdered her. Hashtag 2 party
illusion.
Guys, there needs to be a come to
Jesus meeting right now with the people that
are leading these parties. Both sides. But if
you're a Republican for this point, how are
you okay with that?
If you are, then you're equally disgusting.
Just a press news. Additional story. Just in,
Israeli army executed a family of 7 members
using snipers.
The New York Times published a video investigating
that delves into a series of horrifying events
that occurred in early December. Investigations of this
kind are rare due to lack of sufficient
footage and the difficulty in investigating the sheer
number of similar incidents.
You can watch the video for yourself.
Now, unfortunately, I'm gonna leave it there. I
wanna I'm gonna end with a video.
But I prom I'm gonna make I mean,
look. No matter what, I'm gonna talk about
this right out of the gate the next
time. But the point is simply the idea
that the West Bank is now under invest
under in they're invading. Here is real military
treating the West Bank as the 2nd combat
front. How is that not world global huge
news?
They're invade they're it's all occupied, by the
way, but they are now literally marching in
like stormtroopers
into the West Bank and removing people.
There's no not even the US government says
this. Not that it matters, but it's all
illegal, like everything else they're doing. All it
shows you is there is no red line
here, guys. They can do what they want,
and the supposed rules based order of the
world are gonna look away. In fact, not
just that, they're gonna arm them. They're gonna
clap for them.
That needs that should bother anybody who cares
about anything they pretend they're fighting for here.
They're showing you the destroying of the West
Bank, tearing up the roads, I mean, it's
everywhere.
Everywhere.
Doctors Without Borders
telling you that they're just obstructing their work,
shooting at them so they have to postpone
what they're doing, which is all by design.
They're bragging about taking things in the West
Bank.
It's just so crazy to me. And the
way they report about it is families leave
the West Bank.
That's literally what the BBC says about this.
Oops.
Marion Barghutti says they were forced out of
their homes at gunpoint and then had their
homes bombed as they watched. But, yeah. Families
leave.
Disgusting.
Now, I'm gonna play this
clip to end here. We'll go over this
in the next show.
Just a little and here's that on the
West Bank. 10,300 Palestinians have been arrested since
October 7th in the West Bank.
This is a clip by Ryan Raspiani just
simply talking about the West Bank to end.
And I do wanna go over this point
about Gaza as well, The lies about the
tunnels that I think were ridiculous.
So you know, I'm gonna play, this clip
to end and I'll play I'm gonna go
over the West Bank in the next show
no matter what. But I'm gonna end with
this in general because I wanna end on
a positive note here, guys.
I really do think it's important to recognize
the positive here.
This is a Portland
City Council
who found the courage
to vote unanimously to divest from Israel.
As I said,
the quote, I think it's Margaret Mead, never
doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed
citizens can change the world. Indeed, it's the
only thing that ever has.
And, no, it doesn't mean I'm endorsing everything
that Margaret Mead ever was. Did you know
that she did this, did that?
Always. Every time. The point is the words
mean something, and that's what I agree with.
Because the reality is they want you to
think that, no. It's all about the mass.
You know? You can't vote this way because
you'll give it to them.
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful,
committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it's
the only thing that ever has. That's why
they're so desperately afraid of these kind of
things happening.
So here's what she had to say.
This is a vote by hand. All those
in favor will signify by doing so.
Clerk will notice unanimous.
Now I grabbed the wrong one. That's the
one of the vote.
Here is the statement that I wanted you
to hear.
Hold on.
There we go. As I've been sitting here,
I've been thinking about the old story often
repeated of the girl and the starfish,
where
a young
girl happens upon a beach where she sees
thousands of starfish have washed up on shore,
and she's motivated to try to save them.
And 1 by 1, she picks them up
and begins tossing them back into the water.
And a crowd of people develop around her,
and a man comes up and says, what
are what are you doing? You know? You're
not making an impact. There's so many starfish
here. You're never gonna be able to save
them all.
And she picks up another starfish and tosses
it into the water and says, yeah. But
for that one, it made a difference.
And through her leadership,
the crowd follows her, and each begins picking
up starfish and tossing them back into the
water.
And the reason that this story came to
mind is because this issue,
it's
it's huge, and it feels overwhelming.
And it feels so far beyond the capacity
of 1 municipal body.
But the real
power that any of us has
as individual elected officials
is the power to model leadership
and to have that leadership be guided by
compassion.
This resolution
is a rejection
of
extreme violence.
It's a rejection
of cruelty.
It's a rejection, yes, of genocide and of
war crimes.
And the best that we can do
is to live by our morals
and to hope that we create a ripple
effect
so that others will follow.
Right.
I mean, this is why local voting, I
think, is more important than anything. Right? Look
at the difference you can make, and that
that that goes
drifts upwards. Right? People beyond, like, this will
grow and it already is.
Regardless of what you think or the political
opinions you probably have, the bottom line is
we can all acknowledge that this is wrong
and that whether you think they're driven by
their politics or not, the point is it's
good to see that people are standing up
by and large representing
what the people wanted in their area, but
also just that this is the right thing
to do, that we need to call this
out. And it's not it's this is what
BDS was all about,
to make it a terrorist movement. I mean,
you're literally going through the political channels through
actual legal channels is what they kept telling
telling them to do. And they do it,
oh, you're terrorists there as well.
Even though the act of legal resistance is
actually not terrorism.
But here's what's hilarious about this. So this
person says, hey. Look. They banned this. And
this guy, Orin Barksy, who's, you know, the
one of the many liars around this, he's
the one that lied about the bread hap
you know, the the al Musa bakery that
was destroyed but pretended it wasn't. These guys
are all liars.
But he goes, this Portland, Maine,
what would Israel do without their big investments?
Right. Oh, so that's your response? You're not
important?
Yeah. Your desperation is like, it's reeks.
Like, the I think about what's funny is
don't they always make this point about, look
at this tiny little Israel over here. We're
not
it's just it's just funny to me. Oops.
Zoomed it. There we go. That, you know,
the the idea is simply this is powerful,
and that's why you have to respond to
it.
But your point is that you don't matter.
I just find that to be desperate. I
find it to be very clear what they
what that really shows the opposite. And here
is another person pointing out that in the
UK, they've unanimously,
in this in this in the trades union
congress, voted to halt arms sales to Israel.
It's it's a trickle up effect, guys. It
is happening. People are seeing this. And the
more that we as individuals take action at
our local communities and our businesses,
we are making a difference. Yemen,
the most impoverished nation on the planet, is
making more of a difference than any of
these governments because they are block aiding what
they need to commit genocide, and that's also
affecting their economy, which in many ways is
how is hurting people that might not want
the genocide to continue because most of these
places are struggling. But the point is that's
the fault of the Israeli government that is
committing genocide where the Ansar Halov movement is
the only one having the courage to push
back against these corrupt entities.
They're doing what we should be doing, and
here are more examples of people standing up
where it matters. And there will be pushback.
I guarantee you that Portland itself will probably
have consequences because of that, but it's still
the right thing to do.
News
and it's that the British Trade Union Conference,
the TUC,
have unanimously voted for an immediate end of
all arms sales to Israel because of the
genocide in Gaza.
Now the TUC is a collection of 48
different unions
with a total of 5,500,000
members, thanks to Taj Ali, for these figures.
Now this is really key
because
the government
need to listen to the TEC because if
they don't,
it will result in strikes or industrial action
or have other ramifications.
So what it comes down to, and this
is really important,
Keir Starmer,
are you serving Israel or are you serving
Britain?
Are you on the side of justice Mhmm.
Or on the side of genocide? And, of
course, they wanna make that about racism. No.
Not even remotely. We're talking about a government
committed genocide and you taking what action you
can to stop
it. That's why the desperate claims of racism
are just that, desperate. And it's obvious today.
Now lastly, which I find hilarious and speaking
of desperation,
Vivid, one of these ridiculous, wild pro Zionist
propagandists on Twitter,
says Palestine, in quotes, has been officially granted
a seat at the general assembly of the
United Nations. Great news. And he says, is
this an effing joke? Is it time to
reward for massacring Israelis? Wait. Oh, wait a
minute. I thought that was Hamas. Aren't you
the whole point is that it's Hamas, and
we're trying to help the Palestinians get away
from Hamas? Oops.
Your your your overt racism and hatred
just can't help but be hidden. Or that
can't help but be shown.
The point is, if you're gonna claim that
they should all be punished, well, you're you're
saying all Palestinians, which is what we know.
Just be real. Be honest. You don't what
you think Palestinians are all bad.
Nobody can make that statement because even the
Israeli government is pretending otherwise. But here they
are,
hating. Oh my god. How can we allow
what people that you tell us you wanna
state with to have representation?
Oops. It's just embarrassing how obvious this is.
The bottom line here says down here, granting
a seat to a country that doesn't even
exist, which again is the whole point of
what you're claiming you want, at least up
until October 7th, especially when it's so called
people, in quotes. So so people don't exist
now? Are in favor of killing all Jews?
No. Not even remotely. In fact, quite the
opposite. But this is all they have. Again,
you're racist.
So it boils down to that, doesn't it?
I almost feel bad for these people, but
then I remember they're committing genocide and I
don't care. So let's finish
with an important
clip I've shown before.
Just inspiring.
Long show today, but ultimately, I think we
didn't even get to everything.
Important to keep up on this stuff. And
I'm just As always, I'm gonna make, you
know, do my best to get this to
you as much as I can, as often
as I can. We will eventually get back
to some symbol of normalcy semblance of normalcy,
but thank you for your ongoing support. I
mean, many of you have been sending, you
know, whether it's donations or just words of
encouragement that I you know and everything most
of you end up getting something back from
us eventually. It's what you know, it takes
a minute because we handwrite everything
because it means something to us. And I
wanna make sure you see that, that you
feel that it means the time that it
takes to write this down by hand because
we care as much as you care to
reach out to us and send us something
to support we're doing.
The point though, is that
we will continue to do this no matter
what, and we will continue to push back
into the attacks. And in general, your support
will continue to help us grow and reach
and and, you know, have these conversations.
But as always, the most important thing over
anything else is to get the content out
there and share it. But we have received
all of your amazing letters and all of
your support, and it means the world to
us. We couldn't do without you. As I've
said many times over the years, you are
the last American vagabond.
Thank you for tuning in.
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
You also Hind Rajab,
6 years old in her car.
You all heard the audio, you amplified that
she was 6.
She calls the red present and she says,
I'm scared I'm stuck in the car. They
said, where's your family? She said, I'm surrounded
by their corpses, they're dead. My
dear.
My dear?
He tries to read Quran to a tells
to reassure her, we will send the ambulance.
The genociders were so merciless.
When the ambulance turned up 24 hours, the
tanks blew up the ambulance. Him, 6 years
old, died alone surrounded by the corpses of
her family.
Sidra Sidra Sidra
was playing with her cousin running on the
road.
They told them, go to the south. We
won't touch the south. But they lied. The
liars, they lied.
They bombed the north and then bombed the
south. Sidra, the pictures went viral because of
you. You showed the world she was hanging
from the wall with her legs blown off.
You have exposed
the genociders,
which is why they are ringing the bells
to get you to be quiet.
Which is why they are waiting for us
to slip up to expose us. They are
worried that now that the world has seen
the truth, the highest Jewish representative in the
US in the senate, Chuck Schumer himself,
comes out and says Israel is on course
to becoming a pariah state.
Elizabeth Warren says that if the law is
to be applied, Israel is committing genocide.
Even the right wingers in Donald Trump's rally,
they're chanting genocide, Joe. Genocide, Joe. You entered
areas Palestine couldn't enter before.
You delivered the message to corners it couldn't
reach before. It wasn't because of the mainstream
media. It was you, you carried the voice.
You are making the change. You are changing
the world. They are desperate for you to
go home. They want you to pack your
tits and go home. Tell them and roar,
we're not going home until
Palestine is free. Roar and let them hear
it.