At least in my opinion, I think where
the powers that be, however you wanna define
that,
are taking people is essentially leading us to
some sort of 2 tier society where there
is really no need for a middle class,
and it's really more accurate accurately described as
like a neo feudal
style society
where you have a large underclass managed by
sort of this more elite group,
that would do the managing. And I think
it really falls under,
what some people have referred to as technocracy,
sort of this idea of more of, like,
a scientific,
dictatorship.
And there's actually this prominent,
figure from the Club of Rome, named Dennis
Meadows, and the Club club of Rome is,
an entity that has a very intertwined entity
with groups that have become infamous over the
past several years, like the World Economic Forum,
for example.
But Dennis Meadows essentially said something to the
effect that, you know, for the good of
people and the planet and the economy, and
in his words,
that it was gonna be necessary to either
reduce the world's population so that people could
have freedom and use resources the way they
want
or that, there would have to be a
scientific tater dictatorship,
imposed on 8,000,000,000 or 7,000,000,000 people in order
to to ensure,
accurate allocation of resources and all of this
stuff by
educated technocratic scientific elite.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Saturday, September 7, 2024. Thank you for joining
me today. Now I shifted plans today. I
had a fantastic interview with cast Catherine Austin
5th yesterday around a lot of important topics
that I still may end up playing today.
But I'm gonna say afterward, I may end
up putting that up till tomorrow
for for many different reasons. But I I
today, in in particular, I'm focusing on one
main topic.
And really just one topic, but the things
that may connect through that that may tie
to other things we've discussed.
But yesterday, or rather, I think the day
before yesterday,
I did one of the parts of the
title was the the rise of technocratic regime
change. And my point to discuss on that
show was
to kinda just highlight that this was something
that was new, at least that in my
view, was something that was different than what
we've been seeing. Unfortunately, in the time frame
of the show,
I ended up having to sort of rush
through it at the end in regard to
this a thread that somebody put out.
So I decided today to discuss this because
I planned on on having more conversations about
this.
I decided to go into this one main
topic today and break down not only the
main discussion of Honduras,
this this kind of faux libertarian
utopia
that is called Prospera.
They when I say that, I don't mean
that it's foe like, the I mean that
they're pretending it's some kind of libertarian idea
when it's not. It's, in my opinion, an
obvious technocratic authoritarian
kind of control structure
other than different dynamics of the community they're
using to make it appear this way. But
I mean, like, from the way that it's
being done, the way that it's controlling.
It we'll go into it all. And you
can decide for yourselves, and I hope you
do, about what you think this may be.
But even aside from the labels,
just what this is I find very concerning.
We're gonna go through what this is, the
US backed regime change that created the circumstances
to justify
the economic zones that were created, which allowed
this company to come in and create what
it did.
And then the the dynamic that's happened along
with the government since then, how the people
don't want this there and how it's very
it's it's very manipulative, and it comes back
to the US government. It has ties back
to the Israeli government.
And
on record, on the top of everything,
is being funded by Peter Thiel, overlap with
people like with like Sam Altman,
Andresine, all these different individuals we discussed many
times over the years that are
completely tied in with everything that we've been
discussing around the technocratic drive, the World Economic
Forum.
It's it's it's kind of unnerving to see
how many different things have
undergone a facelift in, like, in the last
so many months even around the new election
conversation, around this new rising idea that it's
now, I guess, Trump and MAGA versus the
world. It's just like a new you you
it's a 2 party illusion 2.0
or communism versus what Trump's doing. All these
different it's really the same dynamic. And the
reason that's brought up in this conversation is
because the same people that are building this,
and I'm gonna make these overlaps.
And and and really overlapping with everything that
in any other context the people supporting them
under Trump would be screaming about are being
pacified around it because they're on Trump's side
of this, on the Trump administration, or part
of whatever they see as this rising new
push against what they think they're fighting. When,
really, when you stand back, it's all just
your government in multiple different ways doing the
same things to compete, keep us divided, keep
us attacking ourselves while whatever they're trying to
accomplish around the world is going off without
a hitch. I mean, in some
cases. And so that is the focal point
of how it pertains to the election conversation,
how it pertains to other different
internal domestic US government and our you know,
as individuals in this country and the way
we perceive it, but then on a bigger
scale.
The idea of just how I and I
think any a lot of people paying attention,
even in this republican conversation,
are seeing that rise of technocracy, as as
Whitney was describing there in a different interview
that we've talked about quite a by a
lot. Now on that interview, what she was
discussing
is not that she views them as elite,
but that they see themselves this way. They're
really elitists.
That's the right way to frame them because
they're not, in my opinion, anyway like, someone
like an Elon Musk is exactly that example
to me. And I'll go over this in
a a small way as we get toward
the end around the new position that it
seemingly has taken on Trump's administration about the
the Department of Government Efficiency.
I mean, if you really understand it's like
Trump calling himself any I mean, the point
is that these people have shown themselves to
not really be what they project.
Trump and and, you know, all the times
he's declared bankruptcy or or Elon Musk and
the many different failures around I mean, looking
at SpaceX or or
Tesla and the just failure after failure and
the crashes after crashes. And, sure, you could
argue they're trying to fine tune. The point
is that
failing,
you know,
spectacularly
every time up until you eventually succeed only
works for people with 1,000,000,000 of dollars and
internal support from the elite circles. If you
were out there trying to accomplish these things
and failed 14 times before you succeed, you
wouldn't have gotten there. So the point is
about how they frame themselves and the overlapping
idea that what we're seeing, in my opinion,
is these technocratic oligarchs all around the world,
mind you, not just in the United States,
slowly taking control.
And I in some cases, not slowly at
all. But if you look at how long
this has been happening and the incremental moves
that that I think we're all paying attention
to, that's what it amounts to to me.
And that's that overlaps other conversations around what
technocracy is. And it's not just science. It's
more of the, you know,
engineers and scientists and the more the the
more technical knowledge around what not just the
politicians that utilize those people and what they
know. And in some sense, that does make
sense to people. The original concept is like,
okay. Well, why wouldn't we want the the
leaders in our community, the ones making decisions,
to be the ones that actually understand how
things work, not just people that are understanding
how to maneuver how things work or maneuver
and manipulate those that do know how? That's
politics for you. But, whether it ever started
in a in a genuine drive or not,
it was very clearly, very quickly something else.
Another shift into some other as she tops
it talks about whether it's with with, you
know, the right people in place, still a
form of dictatorship.
A form of top down technocratic control over
your life for their benefit, just with another
flavor. Or rather, just a authoritarian situation with
another flavor, this time being a technocratic flavor.
So you guys please listen to this stuff
and decide for yourselves, as always.
Especially when it comes to the Israel part
of this. Because I'm gonna make a case
that I think is undeniable, that there's very
clear involvement. That I think, frankly, anyone really
paying attention knows that that's not something that
should be backed at in almost anything we're
talking about. Because they've been showing themselves and
have been shown
and have really been publicly being easy to
see for a very long time. But right
now, people for whatever reason are seeing it
more or able to have shown themselves to
be involved with some of the worst things
in the world. And I'm talking specifically about
the government of Israel
and the many different things involving with US
government, complicity and vice versa that they've done
around the world and involved with many different
genocides and all and this is nothing about
Jewish people or Israeli individuals.
Some there's many overlaps,
but it's about Zionism and Israel's government. And
my point is, be critical about this because
I get that there's a big focal point
here.
And, obviously, I don't even know understand why
anybody can argue that this, whether American or
otherwise, would not be a major central talking
point in the world. You know, like the
way we pretend that any other discussion of
the past should always be, like World War
2 and the Holocaust or any other genocide.
And I always say pretend because everyone can
have their own opinion. But the reality is
we all look back at
Bosnia, Rwanda, and these things are major important
discussions
still to this day. And yet, right now,
while we're in the midst of this genocide,
we've got people trying to shout others down
for, why are you focusing on this? Look
at what else is going on. Well, if
you pay attention, they're also pro I can
the one I'm thinking of anyway is also
talking about those things.
It the when you look into who's calling
them out, you'll notice the one thing they're
not talking about. And that's what I think
the real problem is. But any case, the
point is come to your own conclusions about
what this is and what might be happening
as always. But especially because I think anybody
can lose themselves in other topics. I honestly
don't think that's what's happening, but I just
want everyone to look into this with a
fine tooth comb or go through it with
a fine tooth comb and ask yourself how
big you think this may be. And I'm
only saying that because I'm hoping you will
continue diving through this because I'm convinced this
is something that
and I'll try to define it as best
I can as we go through. And hopefully,
somebody who's smarter than me or more immersed
in this topic will break this down and
kinda find you know, contextualize it more for
us. But
I feel like this is some kind of
new form of governance or some kind of
which really is I should even say I
feel. That's what technocracy would be.
But
as we go through the Honduras part in
particular, you'll notice an interesting dynamic where this
is a corporation,
and you could overlap that with a fascist
concept as well, that's taking control over
locations of other governments, other other nations, but
also with their own police force, with their
own laws in certain zones within other countries.
And you start to ask yourself, What happens
if they ultimately take complete control? Not of
the government, but everything else.
What then is really in control? And are
we then
blinded by the illusion of this
governance
facade while really the powers are somewhere else?
I've just it's just a thought that I
had, but really, please listen to this as
we go through and decide for yourselves. Now
I wanna start
with what I was highlighting the last time.
And I I was just kind of you
know, and I really, I thought of it
afterward. I was mad because I really wanted
to at least break down his thoughts on
this. And I had planned to go through
it again. But you I'm sure you sensed
at the end of the show because I
there was other things going on that I
ran out of time and I had to
go through this reasonably quickly. But Garrison Lovely
here broke this down and he writes, seems
like more people should be talking about how
a libertarian's
char charter city, which is just what they're
calling it. Again, I aggressively disagree when you
see the full picture that this is libertarian
at all, other than
the people that might be involved who are
libertarian, who might be doing things within this
community that they would see that way, but
the control structure from the top down is
not remotely libertarian. It's it is authoritarian.
These are, technocracy.
But
a start up city funded by
Sam Altman,
Mark Anderson,
Peter Thiel,
and how they're trying to bankrupt Honduras right
now. And I'm gonna go through all this
and explain very clearly why this is happening
and how it started.
Now he writes Prospera, which is the name
of this supposed utopia they're building, is suing
Honduras now. This is as of September 3rd,
2024.
The article he's highlighting is from January of
this year.
They're suing Honduras to the tune of $11,000,000,000.
The entire GDP of the Honduras is $32,000,000,000.
And apparently, per New York Times, they're expected
to win.
Which well, you'll see why that adds to
how crazy this is based on how clearly
illegitimate
all of this is. Contracts or not, the
way that this was put in place, to
sit quickly tell you now, is a coup
was taken or carried out in the country.
They put people that they could control who
then made a deal with this company, and
then the people got put back in play.
However you wanna see it, arguably, that the
democratic
process succeeded and people were put back in
place. They removed the coup government, and they
quickly were like, no. And you can see
very clearly, nobody, the gover not the government,
not the people, want these
special zones they've created which allowed them to
do this. So then now that they're in
a position where the people are back in
place and they removed that, they're going, no.
We've got a contract.
Well, yeah. It's a contract with an illegitimate
government that you put in place for a
brief moment of time. Does that make it
legitimate? Well, there's a fair question to ask
in the context of legalities.
But I think there's a conversation to be
had about how they're maneuvering this, Abusing our
adherence to things that they don't care about.
You know, law.
But a good thread here.
You should read it.
So I'll include an article that Derek put
out a while ago, May 2023, about Sam
Altman in particular.
Artificial intelligence, the Bilderberg Group, and Worldcoin,
all overlapping with them trying to get tricking
you into giving your biometric data for a
few coins.
Crazy. That's a separate story, but it's overlapping
with the bigger picture of all these oligarchs
and technocrats
maneuvering and positioning themselves in places that are
growing in control and power over your life.
Now
here is just a quick search for Peter
Thiel, Prospera. And it's Prospera as a private
city and special economic zone. Now that's very
important for this conversation. As you see here,
special development zone. There's a lot of different
terms for the same kind of thing and
it is very relevant and I'll show you
next.
A special economic zone located on the island
of Roatan in Honduras.
It is an autonomous zone with its own
fiscal, regulatory, and legal architecture.
I mean, how that's even possible? I mean,
there's things like this exist, Hong Kong, a
different place in the world
that there that, you know and even then,
you could argue that there's sort of similar
things going on with these areas, but why
any country would allow this? Now think of
it like this. Think of it like, you
know, Israel, for example, setting up its own
little autonomous zone and somewhere in the United
States. Where they are within the United States
structure, but at the same time they're not.
They exist in their own little state with
their own law enforcement, their own laws, their
own fiscal, regulatory, and legal architecture.
Or China. Or Russia.
Any of those should matter. Funny how each
one of those gets different people angry or
ignoring it. The reality being, any other foreign
entity coming in and taking a part of
territory that they claim they own and even
that they legally can act within as they
see fit with their own laws, how is
that something any government, any peoples would allow?
Now that's the main issue, rightly so, of
the current government to this very moment. It's
a complete violation of their sovereignty.
You just coming from an American perspective or
anybody, you know, anybody with logic and concern
would see that this is wrong. That this
is an obvious manipulation.
That anybody else, if it was happening in
your backyard or your own country, you would
care about it.
Now it says the project was initially backed
by American economist and Nobel,
Memorial Prize Laureate Paul Romer, who was involved
in the project's early stages. Now that is
a bit of a it seems as if
they used his
outline.
Now whether he was really involved to begin
with or not is sort of disputed in
the what I've read. Either way, he's not
involved now, and I think it's obvious why.
It seems like a bastardization of what he
was ultimately doing or envisioning envisioning.
You can decide for yourselves on that point.
The reality is that that was an early
thing if ever, and he's not involved now.
Now it says Peter Thiel,
a billionaire entrepreneur entrepreneur, who was a huge
supporter of Trump's administration and literally, financially, almost
entirely backing Peter,
Vance,
hand picked, placed with Trump, even though they
seem to have hated each other before this.
And also, you'll find an overlap of Musk
involved with the Starlink and Honduras in particular,
and we'll get there.
But his through his venture capital firm,
pro I think that's venture. I didn't even
think about it before. Pronomos
Capital. I don't know. It just seems like
pronoun. A fund that appeals the lessons applies
the lessons of Silicon Valley to create a
new model for urban development where the city
is the product.
That sound I mean, how does that in
any way sound like libertarianism?
You're literally creating a democratic
profit zone for them using you as your
capital. The bottom line though is that we're
talking about the Silicon Valley oligarchs, which Whitney
has been really talking about for a long
time being the primary control structure, power structure
of our
country if not the world in regard to
this growing problem.
And that is the Peter Teals of the
world. That is the it's everyone we're discussing.
So the con as it says, controversies, criticisms
are obvious. Neocolonialism,
bypassing their laws, a lack of accountability,
a threat to their sovereignty.
Not some small passing thing. Right?
So
getting into where this, at least for this
story's sake, started in the context of the
coup that took place in 2009.
This is The Guardian article. Crisis of Honduras
democracy
has roots in US tacit support. So let's
just start with the way the corporate media,
which we should never blindly listen to or
trust or really anybody for that matter, let's
even they were framing it at 2009.
And this is written in 2017, but it's
about the 2,009
regime change.
So it says,
shortly after the coup, and this again is
a and even as Guardian's framing it, something
that the US government was involved with allowed
you'll see how it frames it, and then
we're gonna get into the undeniable obvious truth
that this was a US government regime change.
Shortly after the coup, the US froze aid
to the Honduran government. But it was restored
shortly thereafter, and Hernandez has enjoyed continuing support
from Washington. So as usual,
the feigned action.
We we decry the action that we 30
seconds later ignore or blatantly support. So in
this case, they froze the aid, but then
very quick at and they made a statement
about it, and then very quickly went right
back to funding the group.
So that alone should be like, well, that
doesn't make any sense. Either you disagree with
them or you think they're illegal. I mean,
look at how long they like, Maduro or
any of the rest of them, they don't
just quietly go back right afterward. Eventually, with
Maduro and oil for example, they waffle back
and forth.
Either way, the point is and Gardner, by
the way, to Maduro,
none of them support
or rather all of them support the opposition
to Maduro even though they each try to
pretend like the other one supports the other.
No. They're all supporting anything other than Maduro
despite claims of socialism, communism. I think it's
it's ridiculous what people will fall for. And
that's what I think is so funny is
they were on that case.
That's what the Evon conversation was all about.
And look at what they want the other
guy. No. They were openly supporting Maduro.
Or rather, the opposition to Maduro because they
want control. They don't want communism, socialism. They're
all technocrats or oligarchs or authoritarian capitalists.
But it says after the 2009 coup, the
government essentially stopped functioning
in rural areas where organized crime took hold
and cocaine shipments started arriving in large numbers.
Yeah. Pretty much what always happens when the
US government
liberates the country.
No. What they did was put a illegal
government in power, which they which would that
government would be happy to allow them to
do whatever they want because they got power
and lots of money. And they could rob
and steal and rape and do whatever they
want, and the government gets to do what
it wants. That's how that works. The same
reason Israel funds Hamas or the US government
and Israel fund all the radical people in
the Middle East and then use that as
an excuse to justify what they're doing. It's
what they do.
So the point is that after 2009,
they they people in power didn't care about
the people of Honduras. So it's obvious why
the people of Honduras are aware that this
was not in their interest right away.
And, of course, the issue with cocaine shipments,
you know, if it's a hint or even
an allegation from Venezuela, oh my god. It's
a big threat to our democracy. But we'll
ignore Colombia and Brazil, all the rest of
them which are the leading cocaine distributors, but
it's our allies, so we don't care, speaking
for the US authoritarian
control structure. It says this prompted even more
US anti drug assistance.
Now you'll rapidly see as this goes through.
What that amounted to was more presence, more
funding, which went right in the hands of
the people they claimed they were pushing back
against.
It's all an illusion. And I mean, explicitly
and easy to prove. Then it says, as
institutions
hollowed out and became corrupted,
you know, after the US assistance to stop
those things, gang activity increased and the United
States government got a wave of migrants.
And now you're beginning to see how this
all plays into the bigger picture as well.
Because like every other one of these games,
they create the very migrant problem that they
point to later to justify what they want,
or in this case, to trick you into
a digital ID or whatever else. But it's
always
I never I shouldn't say always, but in
almost every case we can see that relates
to US foreign policy or domestic policy,
it's because of US foreign actions.
Or their allies and they're going along with
that. But in this case, they've literally created
the migrant problem that nobody was paying attention
to at that time in the context of
why they may have caught might have caused
it. Or a few anyway.
It says, an unstable Honduras will mean more
of this. That's a quote.
Now in many cases, you could argue that
was the point.
Honduras has long been a strategic partner for
Washington.
Since 2009, you know, after they the coup
government took control and they pretended they were
outraged at the corruption despite funding them, the
US has invested nearly a $140,000,000
in security assistance
to establish elite military and police units.
Okay. So, right now, if you can look
back, which we can, and recognize that they
only continue to work with this group, and
they only continue to give them assistance, and
this is the only reason they've established this
you realize that that was not going to
anything other than helping them build out their
structure that they were using to control the
country.
Because that's what happened. It says ratchet up
border security and carry out counter narcotics operations
as part of Hernandez's crackdown on gangs. You
know, the very person that was put in
position by them. Or the idea that this
was something that only grew despite these things.
It's an illusion.
One side of this is always about controlling
international,
you know, geostrategic control,
resources.
But also about using these to you know,
you got these different groups, many of which
the people involved with don't even recognize they're
being used, USAID employees and so on, who
think they're going to help. Here, we're gonna
give assistance and we're gonna help build these
to fight for the people.
And all it really does is dump this
stuff in the control of the people they're
working with.
And, you know, and then that then gets
used to justify why we need more of
these programs. Because look, we need it. It's
a money laundering and and, you know, every
other thing you could add to it.
It's the corruption of what our governments are.
It says the country still ranks among now
this is today, mind you. 2017.
After all that money, after your tax dollars
that went through this, right now, the country
still ranks among the most violent places in
the world and remains a key corridor for
drug smuggling to the United States. Now it's
despite their million $100,000,000
investment in stopping that exact thing.
It didn't go away. It only got worse.
That's because it wasn't trying to stop it.
Then despite corruption scandals implicating the very government
that they pretend they're fighting, Hernandez is still
regarded
right now as a reliable US ally. Funny
how that shifted. So from 2,009, they were
like, bad guy, coup, and drugs and stuff,
and we're gonna fund to stop all of
that, and then brief and without it just
we look in other directions, suddenly there's an
ally. Suddenly, we he's working alongside the US
government all the way to this day. Obviously,
a child can see that that was not
actually what happened. They put this person in
place and a 1,000 other things happened around
it. We're focusing today on the creation of
these zones which allowed the technocratic city that
they built.
You know, you could also call it a
smart city. A 15 minute city if you
will.
The US Democratic senator Patrick Leahy at the
time said he had yet to receive information.
Oh, wait. I skipped the part. Now it
says after this after the point of them
saying that he's right now or at least
in 2017 when they wrote this and he's
not in power right now, the point is
that he was still an ally up until
that point. But the US government had barely
commented
on the current crisis, it says. Beyond a
few embassy statements, praising a partial recount and
lamenting the violence.
Typical. Right?
Lazy responses like, you know, we care and
that should stop. Oh, yeah. Really. Good great
job. Here and by the way, here's a
$100,000,000 to keep doing the things we just
claimed we didn't like.
The US Democratic senator Li Hay has yet
to receive information he has requested from the
US embassy
about the electoral irregularities
and the violence that followed.
The point to this case is about how
they've maintained control over these people using illegitimate
elections because that's what they do. And he's
going, well, I'm I'm I'm still waiting on
you guys to give me ins insight into
all these irregularities.
He says the lack of responsiveness the responsiveness
in such a time of crisis is troubling.
Yeah. You can imagine what happened, nothing,
So the US embassy didn't care. Despite this
crisis, however, it writes Reuters reported this week
in 2017
that the US had quietly certified Honduras
for making progress in fighting corruption and improving
human rights. Despite being one of the most
dangerous places in the world still.
Freeing up millions in US assistance. Funny how
that works.
So you put the bad people in place,
you then decry their violence, but then fund
them and pretend you're stopping what they're doing,
but then go on to call them a
a continual ally.
And And then when it just becomes a
little bit less of a terror zone and,
you know, unstable situation,
you go, great. You're getting better. Here's more
money.
That sound like a legitimate process to anybody?
Guys, this is literally what's going on all
around the world. It says the cert the
certification and the weak embassy statement so far
tell us how low a priority democracy and
human rights are
on this administration's list of US interests, says
Iacson Isaacson.
So the point is despite what they're saying,
the reality to everybody included in the situation
is that they clearly do not care that
people are suffering. They gave more money to
the government that created the suffering because they
put them there.
So this is 2009,
written about in 2017.
Now here
is an interview with The Intercept.
This is on July of this year, 2024.
Honduras, 15 years after the coup, an interview
with ousted president Manuel Zelaya, was the which
is the person they removed from power to
put their lackey in place.
Now the point
here, it says democratically elected Honduras president Manuel
Zelaya was ousted by a military coup. The
coup led and this is what's important. This
is what you're just kinda summing up what
I was going over right there. So they
removed him from power.
That coup led to 13 years of a
right wing rule marked by collusion with drug
trafficking organizations,
widespread privatization, that's one of the things that's
the focal point of this today, violence, repression,
and a significant migrant
migrant exodus. Now and so what do they
get for doing that and allowing that to
be the case? Multiple stages of funding from
the US government and military help and literal
training on the ground, which I can only
imagine was involving Israel. That's my opinion, but
I'll get to why I'll get to why
I say that.
Zelaya sits down for an exclusive interview with
journalist Jose Olivares to discuss the 15th anniversary
of the coup, the end the ensuing
resistance movement,
the right wing and drug trafficking organizations' control,
and the US government's role and influence. It's
a great interview. It's really just like a
back and forth
actual interview written written down so you can
read the whole thing for yourself.
Now here is is a clip, which I'll
play for you.
The gray zone interviewed him as well. And
this was on June 29th, 2019.
The US has almost complete control over Honduras.
Now, again, all these take with a grain
of salt. You don't know whether they could
be lying or he could be saying this
for his interest. But, again, all of the
facts behind this and and from every direction
clearly back this up. But look into it.
Question it for yourself.
And this is, Anna Prumpill sits down with
president former president Zelaya on the 10th anniversary
of the US backed right wing coup that
overthrew him. Here's what it says. It's been
10 years
since you were removed
in a US backed coup
from your position as the democratically elected president
of Honduras.
What has the United States accomplished
here since then?
What has changed in your country?
He says that that has been a sacrifice
for the Honduran people.
Because the side that took power had the
support of the United States.
He says the US is the major beneficiary
of the coup.
And there is a principle in in penal
law that says
The beneficiary of a crime is the principal
suspect.
Really, that's the same as saying who benefits.
How has it been the beneficiary?
The US, he says. The US is almost
complete
control over Honduras.
Control over justice through the OAS.
That's important.
The Organization of American States is the same
thing that was used to manipulate,
Bolivia.
And remember,
they're same thing what they did they didn't
successfully just do with Venezuela. Same argument.
They said it's a little legitimate election. And
the same thing, there were 100 of international
observers from all over the world, countries that
are even US allies that said, nope. It
was on the up and up. Same with
Venezuela. But in Bolivia at the time in
Bolivia, they had more military influence and power,
and so they ultimately used that power to
overthrow him. With the OAS giving it some
semblance of legitimacy
saying, it wasn't a legitimate election and we're
all about democracy.
Right? And then when they used the military
to take power and then didn't hold another
election, they were like, yay, democracy.
No. In fact, they just went really quiet
and stepped away, which shows you they don't
really care about democracy if what they got
what they didn't comment on was a military
control. I remember, I think I believe she
was even put in jail after that eventually.
Of course, nobody talked about that.
The the point is that this was about
control and influence over Bolivia, and the OAS
just dutifully went along with it. They are
not a legitimate organization. They've proven that many
different times. That's what he's saying. They have
control through it over with things like this.
Think of it like the USAID and NED,
National Down For Democracy. These are regime changed
trojan horses. That's what they are.
Under the illusion of humanitarian assistance, which is
why they're basically illegal in many other countries
around the world because they're very aware of
how they use these things. We've seen this
in with the overlap of of,
Taiwan, the United States, or even Hong Kong,
many different times where they've come and caught
using these
tools openly.
Control He goes on to say, it controls
security through the southern command.
Control It controls the economy through the International
Monetary Fund.
World Bank and IDB. You're gonna see how
the World Bank comes into play with this
overlap already.
It controls the me the media networks in
Honduras.
And you can see obviously why now look.
There's a valid point to make about why
country and censorship has to matter just as
a general constant.
But you can at least understand why other
entities who can see how these things are
being used might have an who might make
the wrong decision to just blanket censorship.
But under the mindset that these things are
being used to circumvent their power. Now my
point in saying it like that is that
I disagree with censorship of individuals regardless.
Period.
But at the same time,
another action I think should've been taken other
than censorship, but I think they have a
right mindset in regard to why these things
are being used. Now I'm not saying that's
necessarily Twitter. I do feel that's likely with
where we are right now. But I'm only
has I'm not I'm only saying it that
way because I'm objective enough to say that
I don't have hold cold hard evidence that
Twitter is being used in that same way
right now. I've got there are there are
evidence, I think, to suggest that, but I
would let's just say it's not proven.
But with things like Brazil, for example, we'll
get to in a minute. I think we
should at least consider that both things are
happening. Right? Brazil is definitely censoring, and we
should not be okay with that. But I'm
very interested in how there might actually be
some
that Twitter could be used as a vehicle
for exactly like we're talking about. I mean,
quite frankly, I think that's a no brainer.
I think these social media platforms are in
many ways used like Israel's using right now
against you in this country or all around
the world and used in that way. But
censorship, I don't agree. I don't think is
the answer. I just don't. I think I
think that's obvious.
It funds many churches which receive donations from
North American NGOs.
Very, very manipulative. The
North American.
If And it finances Honduras' NGOs.
They that not not even like the USAID
type things, but specifically ones created in Honduras
and as an illusion.
So you think that these are Honduras
organic grassroots things that they've literally put together,
funded, and used as vehicles in the same
way.
We have to consider these things.
It says it controls public opinion.
It controls the powers of the state.
And in this way, it has high interference.
Poor states, weak states, states like Honduras, he's
saying,
where the rulers to receive protection give up
everything to the North Americans. Not that he
said, by the way. Not that I'm saying
that, you know, it is. It's in that
the Honduras is in that position because of
these regime changes, but he's talking about other
states in that same way that are being
taken advantage of because of that.
To receive protection, give up everything. He's saying
these people and this is the point about
it's not it's that part of it, giving
up
control or to to everything to North Americans
because
protection and can and and their, you know,
power.
But I think people are put in that
position who are already willing to make that
kind of compromise because they just want have
they want power.
Right? But the usual the history shows that
they're the next person to be used. The
Saddam Hussein's of the world, the Osama bin
Laden's of the world will tell you that.
And that's not to say they're good people,
not even remotely. They're terrible, that's the point.
They chose them because they're bad people. But
the point is that they were,
right before they became the biggest boogeyman alive,
they were an ally of the US government.
Saddam Hussein,
some I mean, remember, the Washington Post literally
called Osama bin Laden a warrior of peace
before he became the biggest boogeyman.
That's propaganda for you.
So the point, clearly,
is that the US government was responsible
for the regime change. Now it's not because
they said so. I think that's because the
facts very clearly show that. Now, what this
essentially set up
and, again, remember, we're talking about one aspect
of a much larger, as always,
multifaceted agenda. When it comes to resources, to
geostrategic
control, other regime changes,
but specifically focusing on one aspect of what
this was done. What you know, and this
could even be a byproduct in your mind,
that they did this for financial
interests. But it ultimately built into something I
think is becoming far more relevant. Now they
took control with this coup government. And one
of the things they were referencing there, which
we'll get into more in-depth, is what they
set up what are called zones for employment
and economic development. And of course, this was
out of the guise of doing this because
we wanna help the people. Despite everything continually
getting worse all
until that person was removed from power.
That's not by accident, mind you. No. These
are called zed
zed zed, zone for employment and economic development.
And it's an administrative division in Honduras that
provides a high level of autonomy
with its own civil code. And while subject
to the criminal code of the Honduras government,
its claims, there's there's an issue right there
already on the table with the fact that
they have their own laws created which circumvent
what Honduras
has laws for themselves.
So one of the main points that's coming
up now is that whether or not they
the point even before the contract and how
they're being sued even comes into play, they're
saying they were already violating laws, and even
the original contract might be null and void
because they never met what they claimed. We'll
get to that. The point is that they
set up these zones.
That created the justification for Peter, Theo, and
Prospera
to
begin
their occupation, if you will, of part of
Honduras
for larger for other interests. Now another name
for the ZED
would be called special development zones.
Special development zones are SDZs.
Now, really, zed is a specific to Honduras
point, so in a larger context, they're called
special development zones. What are those? Designated areas
within a country or region that have unique
legal, administrative, and institutional frameworks, exactly what we're
talking about, to facilitate rapid economic growth, that's
the claim anyway, development, and innovation.
Key characteristics.
And I even I just did this so
I wouldn't miss the things I highlighted, which
already went away.
Allowing for experimentation,
which I find interesting.
Doesn't have to be some kind of weird
scientific thing. It was just, you know, experiment.
But the point is, these are, locations to
kind of experiment, adapt to to new things,
and change. That that
we all know how that can be concerning
with oligarchs and technocrats and billionaires
playing god. But
inclusive and sustainable.
Okay. So remember, this is Peter Thiel backing
Trump's campaign who put
Vance in place.
Another technocrat billionaire would be Elon Musk, who
I'm gonna show you I think is involved
with this. But either way, the point is,
these are made for the aim to achieve
inclusive and sustainable
development.
Okay. You may just say those are just
similar words and it doesn't have to be
the same thing, except the fact is another
another term for SDZs is also
SDZ, which is stan Sustainable Development Zones.
And again, these are these these are synonymous.
Special development zones or zone for employment and
economic development or simply just sustainable development zones
are the same thing.
This one, the definition, a concept introduced by
the SDZ Alliance,
a nonprofit organization which aims to create new
urban communities
with special legal administrative institutions. You see? Same
thing. But to promote
sustainable development in line with the UN Agenda
2030.
That has to be relevant.
I'm sure a lot of Republicans who don't
wanna recognize this is the backing for the
Trump administration is gonna wanna review you know,
that's probably the point is, guys, it's all
the same thing. It's not a attack on
Trump, but Kamala is the one. No. They're
all doing it. Every single one of them.
And anyone that's really listening to this show
or what I'm saying is not pretending this
is some kind of a
veiled attack on Trump. This is the point
is, they are the ones being pushed forward
as the next step. They are the selection
in my mind. Kamala is a joke. She's
a ridiculous authoritarian joke that is completely shown
to be such by everything she's saying.
I mean, if we can all acknowledge she's
not a serious candidate, why would I I
mean, the point is that's a static reality.
I don't think they're I think the obvious
point is that they don't even I mean,
we'll see how this goes. My mind is
that either way, this is what's happening. Because
clearly, at least the republicans could acknowledge that
that's what they're pointing at. I'm just trying
to make sure we see that all so
too are the republican side of this. To
make that an attack on Trump is that
that only becomes an attack for you because
I'm highlighting an an uncomfortable truth that also
exists on the side of Kamala, which we
all agree with. So how is that an
attack? It's simply acknowledging or putting light on
the full picture.
My point in showing you this is that
these are the same things under a different
name, being built by different people,
driving the same agenda.
Now here's what this is the Latin American
Working Group
wrote about what this is in general. Just
to give it a very clear point. What
is a zone for employment and economic development?
It says its supporters sell it as a
chance for countries to attract investment and increase
economic development.
ZEEDs or zedis
is a fancy term to cover up the
fact that foreign investors
can buy territory
and com and hold complete control
over a large portion of land with within
the state of Honduras.
Or special development zones otherwise are elsewhere the
same way, but in different states
or countries.
But it says, yes. You read that right.
This means the government of Honduras
practically gives up rights over that land.
The z becomes a state within a state.
This started to sound familiar like other things
we're seeing happen in the world.
The law has the potential to undermine the
rights of of workers.
It says leaving them with vulnerable
to the whims of private investors.
In 2021, the United Nations warned the Honduran
government that zedie law would threaten human rights
of Honduran citizens. There are currently 3 zeds
in the country. 3 of them. We're only
talking about one today, Prospera.
And that's specifically located on Roton,
an island, which apparently they're just about to
build their second one on the island. Despite
the illegality of it right now.
Which that only makes my point, we'll get
to, about the fact that they don't care
in any sense that it's illegal. They're suing
them based on the fact that they violated
a contract, but they're, right now So that's
only based on the idea that they signed
that contract at a time when those were
allowed.
Because the coup government.
Now, they've already appealed that. We'll get to
it. But the fact that they're going, we
want a second one, we're gonna make that
happen while they it's there's no way that
could be shows you they don't care about
the laws. I think they're hoping to get
control of Honduras through this.
Excuse me. It says, this sounds bizarre, but
seeds are not a new concept.
It originated with the US economist at New
York University, Paul Romer, as we mentioned before.
But, yeah, whether or not he had good
intentions, the outline seems to be based, at
least on the surface, about improving the lives
of the individuals and not about profiteering under
the guise of liberty for technocrat oligarchs,
which I think that's largely why he probably
is not involved today.
But going forward,
the point is in 2022,
the president, the new president,
who ran her entire campaign, or at least
the focal point of getting rid of these
zones,
she got elected.
And again, you could argue that the reason
this might like, let's just say going back
to the point of US regime change, you
have to realize at this time and still
even more so right now, the US government
has a lot on its plate.
They're they're failing regime changes everywhere else. So
I think it's clear to point out that
the reason this might have been that they
couldn't step in and make sure their people
maintain control is because they are spread thin.
It's my personal opinion. Or I guess you
could consider that this person too is a
coo is a puppet. That's always something to
consider, but the actions deviate from what their
agenda is. Either way,
president announces repeal of the ZEDI law and
classifies it as a violation of national sovereignty.
To me, that directly challenges the US government
interests, the coup government interests, the technocrat oligarch
Peter Thiel funded interest, what they're trying to
do, all of this.
So here in 2022 in July, the articles
written by The Guardian, go home. Honduran islanders
fight what they call at this point, crypto
colonists or colonialists. Now it says, when the
new Honduras government repealed a pair of laws
in late April that had allowed for the
creation of a semi autonomous zone called a
ZEED,
I'll just go with that, it sent a
similar message. But investors in the ZEED on
Roton,
known as Honduras Prospera,
have challenged the move. So now we're getting
into the point of 2022,
they
the people arguably took control back of of
the government, or at least what they wanted
to be in power. They immediately repealed this
law because it's completely illegitimate to my mind,
violate their sovereignty,
made with an illegitimate government in the 1st
place.
Right? It's a military coup that took place.
I mean, that how can that be regarded
as somehow the people's
democratic choice. Right?
And so now, because of this, they're challenging
what they're doing and they're suing them, and
that's where the $11,000,000,000
lawsuit comes in. It says, quote, when investing
in Honduras,
Honduras Prospera Inc, I'll show you who the
CEO is, relied on specific legal stability guarantees
from Honduras
that the rights and authorities provided by the
ZEED legal framework will remain in effect as
to Prospera for many decades. Well, you made
it this deal with an illegitimate coup government
put in place by the US, probably, at
least in one case, for this purpose.
And that's what investors wrote in their May
4th statement.
They added
they they said Honduras
they added that they expect Honduras to respect
its commitments
under legal stability agreements and international treaties.
There's a few different treaties I think they're
referencing there. 1, I think, has to do
with a more of
a
I I think I have it listed somewhere
else. I don't want the one one people
discussed within this is in one of these,
international treaty agreements with Canada that Trump put
in place, which might add. The point is
they're putting these different ideas out there saying
these different things make the legal case for
why you can't renege on this deal. But
I don't I, personally, I find this to
be quite incredible seeing as how, one, the
government clearly backing this doesn't honor just about
any deal anywhere that they don't want anymore.
On top of the fact that these people
are clearly acting illegitimately through all the maneuvering
laws, making their own, the fact that they're
hope for asking basically, demanding that they up
adhere to the a law that was passed
while they manipulated, and I'll get to that
next, by putting other judges in place that
would make that the case. Then they appeal
that based on the fact that that law
should be upheld even though it was illegitimate
to begin with.
It says the controversy dates back roughly a
decade when the Honduran government,
under the coup government, reformed the
constitution and passed a law that paved the
way for the creation of these zones.
The idea, as I pointed out, was, it
says, ripped from the economist Paul Romer's proposal
of a charter cities,
which the Nobel Prize winner theorized could promote
development in areas plagued by poor governance.
Now you can see how the very idea
of something being used to circumvent poor governance
is being used to literally create poor governance.
It says, Romer Romer proposed that a former
a a foreign nation act
as a guarantor
for the governance of charter cities,
but the Honduran law instead allowed corporations to
build a private city. So that's my point.
That's why I think it's quite clear that
he does not wanna be involved with this
because it wasn't the original concept.
The idea that even then, I don't the
idea that that makes that any of these
can be abused. But the idea that you
would create sort of a special zone that
would and a a a neutral third party
government would act as the guarantor. But all
they really did was use that to then
allow companies to come in and make a
privatized entity.
I mean, it's it's like everything else we're
talking about. Public private partnerships. We're watching this
act slowly drift forward,
which seems to be circumventing everything we think
we're guides our current situation.
But it's all and my point is we
a lot of people don't even see it
happening. We're gonna wake up one day in
a new control structure, that's the whole idea
we're talking about. The technocratic panopticon, where in
every angle, whether digital IDs or what we're
talking about here, we're being slowly drifted into
that and half the people aren't even seeing
it happening.
It goes on to say,
further inflaming the situation,
Prospera posted on its website
drawings of 3 stages of expansion
that appeared to include the center of crawfish
rock, which is an essential area there, within
this jurisdiction.
So now we're getting to the point to
where not only are they resisting what the
people want and what the current government wants
and threatening to bankrupt the entire country,
they have plans that are publicly posted where
they plan to absorb new areas. How is
that
not
occupation?
That the crawfish rock does not want that.
That's what they're openly stating. It says, Stoking
fears that investors could invoke a legal clause
that would allow for the expropriation
of the land the community has lived on
for generations.
So this is again, there's a clause within
this that's been added by this an illegitimate
government using an illegitimate situation with packing the
the the or adding more judges that are
more prozied to get this to pass in
the first place, in fact removing some that
didn't, it shows you this whole thing is
illegitimate.
It then allows them to, I guess, just
say we can take more territory.
It says, as the controversy
oh, wait. Hold on. Where were we?
Yeah. Representatives of Prospera
promised that they would not go that route.
But their words provide a little comfort.
So the point is they have a a
stated and a a drawings where they show
them taking this territory. It's a clause within
an illegal and I argue an illegal deal,
but they're going, don't worry though. We just
won't do it. Sorta sounds like other promises
we hear all the time. As as the
controversy spread across the nation, a movement was
born that demanded the protection of land rights
and decried the succession the concession of sovereignty
sovereign territory to foreigners
and corporations.
Guys, this see, right there, this should be
quickly be shown as a bigger issue that
everyone in the world is talking about. Whether
we're talking about Nestle taking water rights, whether
we're talking about any number of corporate entities
taking assets,
whether we're talking about the COVID 19
contracts that Pfizer had with governments that they
had to put their own assets on for
collateral. We're watching some kind of weird shift
of power and control over assets that are
necessary that circumvent government control. Corporations taking that
control. Or oligarch technocrat,
fake libertarian cities. I mean, it's all it's
it's it's hard to define,
but I know if you're if you're watching
along, I'm I'm hoping you can see
the kind of the the
developing that's another word I was gonna put
right there. The kind of emerge
it's emerging as something that is bigger than
just one individual project here and there.
And as Americans,
again,
can you even imagine a foreign government or
company, an Israeli company, a Chinese company, a
Russian company, claiming to own land within this
country or within your county or within your
town? Or how about we talk about Israel
and and Palestine, the idea of the land
disputes? Like, cannot can't we see how important
this is?
Now it says president, I think it's Xiomara
Castro,
who was elected in a landslide in November,
made the zed a signature issue of her
campaign. Now remember, this article was written
in
2022.
So she in November 2022
well, I think it maybe it was 2021.
In any case, the point was that she
was elected,
and was basically on the primary point of
removing these zones. Now it says, when Castro
sanctioned the repeal in April, she called it
the most important day in her presidency thus
far. Yeah. So I'm I'm thinking 2021 November,
and then April, when the article was written,
is when this is being stated. Go home.
We don't want you here. Now it's important
to recognize is despite that, they don't care.
For the people of Crawfish Rock, who see
that as their next to be taken, absorbed
by
this illegitimate entity,
is mo it most certainly was to them.
A very important day.
Words cannot describe how happy we were, it
says. But the the elation was short lived.
Just before the repeal,
Prospera announced a new round of investments
totaling $60,000,000
and the adoption of the cryptocurrency
Bitcoin as legal tender.
Now, again, from some perspective, you could argue
that that might be something that any that
we should want.
But
others have a very clear concern about cryptocurrency
in general. All of those things are something
we should consider. My my worry is what
we keep talking about with Peter Thiel and
Elon Musk and Donald Trump and RFK Junior
and this weird kind of co opting of
the Bitcoin space. And as we'll get to
with my our discussion with k Katherine Austin
Fitts,
I mean, lays out how that I mean,
that changed her entire support around RFP Junior.
As far as I can tell, she doesn't
even and I think she stated this. She
doesn't support him anymore because of that that
one speech she gave around this that seems
to be outrageous. Her her her point is
that the very claim of using Bitcoin the
way he claimed he would is completely illegal.
Using or arguably using an executive
order to change
certain financial dynamics of the way our country
I mean, the her argument is simply that's
illegal and it's he knows that.
In any case, this whole Bitcoin overlap, the
way that they're trying to use it is
do I mind completely undermines the very premise
of what these things were built to do?
Or I shouldn't say it like that because
I'm also one that would consider at the
very least whether these things were built from
the very starting point as something to control
us. My point is what what the community
believes these things are built to do.
So going forward, it says, in these weeks
months since, the company has continued to operate
as if nothing has changed,
moving ahead with construction projects and clinging to
their plan to build a libertarian
oasis of sorts. Not even remotely what it
is, regardless of what you think it's doing.
Government officials said that any ZED currently
operating
has 1 year to conform to another kind
of legal framework.
And so that's where we get into the
lawsuit that is beginning because after that year
passed, which is 2022, the point is at
the end of 2023,
which we're gonna do next,
they they're suing them. And and seemingly, I
almost argue by design,
collapsing the government. And what happens if they
win and it goes to bankruptcy?
Does that mean that the Peter Thiel's Prospera
company could essentially take
what the I mean, I don't I don't
yes. It seems that way. But now we're
talking about governments and states. What about the
peoples of that country? They didn't vote for
that. So now we're seeing a possibility for
where you can have a literal shift of
power on the rec like, at the highest
level
without any kind of democratic process. Well, guess
what? That's pretty much what already happens and
we just lied to about it.
Well, not that we should accept that or
want that. We absolutely
need to change this.
The idea that we should pretend that everything
is the way it should be, but they're
just kinda bad choices, that's the real black
pill here in any of these countries. The
point is that we need to recognize how
bad it really is to effectively
possibly change it.
Now it goes on to say, but investors
cite a sunset clause
in the seed law that gives them a
term of at least 10 years, as well
as other international trade agreements that they claim
grants them decades more. Again, made with an
illegitimate government with an illegitimate
con
judicial setup with an illegitimate
agreement
because of all of that. That's how I
see this.
Either way, you don't
literally military coup an entire government out of
place and then put someone in place that
will make this deal and then pretend that
that deal has standing.
It says legal analysts consulted by The Guardian
suggested that in order to avoid a lawsuit,
the government could either strike an agreement with
investors
or challenge whether the zed were created in
strict accordance with the now repealed laws.
Okay. So that's a different dynamic. I argue
they should be going at this from the
main point, which, again, I don't think would
succeed quite frankly because I think the government
structure or the legal structure would side with
the American government like they usually do. But
what they're saying is that they might in
fact be vi have violated, which seems to
be the case, even the laws they set
up to abide by themselves.
Right? So they set up this idea, the
z the z this ekno economic zone structure
that allowed them to set this up. What
they're saying is they may well have not
even been in accordance with that law anyway.
So if they can prove that, well, they
can make it null and void to begin
with.
It says, quote, I emphatically believe that the
repeal is good, but it does not end
there, said Gustavo
Solorzano,
lee legal adviser for COHEP, the country's largest
chamber of commerce.
Says now, the state has to review these
concessions, and it would be best for the
state to verify if all the legal requirements
were even met. Or if not, proceed to
cancel the concessions delivered.
Says meanwhile, the residents of Crawfish Rock remain
vigilant and says, quote, we have our eyes
open. We don't trust no one.
So going forward,
now in 2023,
July,
Prospero demands Honduras pay them
$11,000,000,000
for outlawing privately run city.
This is pretty damn alarming to me.
This company, it says bay bay US state
of based out of Delaware,
which is what it says on paper, but
the reality is their offices in it's it's
a Washington DC loca I'll show you on
the SEC filing. So I find it interesting
that they are we're in Delaware, but there's
a lot of weird I I think that
I think what we already went over shows
that this is clearly something government connected.
But the point is, getting them to pay
them $11,000,000,000
for outlawing what is an illegitimate thing to
begin with.
Based on the idea floated by former World
Bank, and same thing, Paul Romer,
it was it was, I had I had
I'm just gonna skip it, I had highlighted
it but I lost it, I didn't take
a screenshot.
The point the the main point was what
I was just saying a second ago.
What happens if this goes forward?
Or even just the idea that in any
sense, you can have a company
through contracts which, again,
with a government that was illegally put in
place by the government of the United States
to make this the case,
essentially take control of the government, or all
of the assets and everything that means anything,
even if the government remains. Who's actually in
control?
Is it just some kind of an illusion
of control if everything is being run by
this new outlawed private city concept?
We'll have to see how this goes for
either way, whether this wins or not, what
they're already showing you is this is part
of what's happening. This, you know, I think
is a new structure, a new regime change
tactic, a new vision for how they will
control things.
They being, in this case, these technocrats.
But it could be any number of overlapping
points. Now this brings us to the article
that was shared from the original thread.
This is from January
24,
2024.
So think of the timing on this. Right?
So this brings us into the beginning of
2024.
I'll I'll come back to this, but remember
the date on when this so the point
is in right at the towards the end
2023
is when this lawsuit was put out.
Now it says they they allow the
these special
economic zones, allow private corporations to enjoy an
astonishing level of autonomy, which you already know,
just to read it again, including establishing their
own courts,
laws,
tax systems, and private police force. How in
any way are we gonna pretend that that
means they're still somehow bound by the government's
laws that they're clearly ignoring right now?
Clearly, this is not about adhering to anything,
but taking control.
What government, what people would allow this? This
is a direct violation of sovereignty. What about
the people in that live in these areas?
Because you have to realize what like with
Crawfish Rock, for example. They're already being shown
to be the next area they're gonna absorb,
and they don't want that. Well, are they
now have adhering to the new laws made
by Peter Thiel's Prospera?
Now it says all with virtually no transparency
or accountability mechanisms. Why? Because it's a private
company, guys. It's a public private partnership. Well,
I think that's the reality because I very
clearly see the government strings attached to this.
But the point of doing that is to
hide the fact that it is connected.
No transparency.
In 2021, the United States and United Nations,
as we've read before, expressed strong concern over
this, stating they had posed a potential threat
to human rights.
The United Nations
estimated
that Zieves would wind up controlling
approximately
35%
of the country's territory.
35%
of the entirety of Honduras.
That same year, a Honduran court, a corruption
watchdog,
published a scathing report on ZEEDs highlighting the
opportunity
they provide for corruption actors to corrupt actors
to engage in money laundering and other illegal
activities. Well, guess what, guys? That's what your
governments do everywhere.
That's in fact how they keep things moving.
Money laundering,
human drug trafficking, everything. And this is not
my opinion. You know how many times over
the years the CIA's been caught trafficking drugs?
Or human trafficking across war zones?
DynCorp. We just mentioned this and I agree
with Catherine's fact. DynCorp was a huge issue.
Nobody talks about it now because we don't
want it. People the government and the media
don't want that to be a focal point.
But the point is, this is what they
actually do. And the the report simply showed
that. That's what these things are doing. They're
creating the area through and we must not
forget, the 2009 coup,
the 13 years after that, that's what it
did. It increased all those things. And here
is a little special zone that it's now
facilitating that as well. Now it says, understandably,
these are highly unpopular for Honduras. That's a
point to remember regardless of what the new
election government,
the people of Honduras have been outspoken about
how they don't want these things. There's been
campaigns. One of their slogans is no to
the zed. This is the people.
Citing potential future losses, Honduras Prospera,
the company, it says a Delaware based US
company, but again, we'll come back I'm gonna
show you the reality of where it's actually
located.
District of Columbia, Washington. That's the name of
their location.
It says
that it's operating a zed called Prospera on
the island, off the northern coast of Honduras,
is suing the Honduran government in an investor
state dispute settlement court located in at the
World Bank. So, gee, I wonder where this
is gonna go.
It's all part of the game, guys. It
says, though US president Joe Biden has announced
his opposition to such investment,
investment state arbitration and future trade agreements,
The Zeed investors claim has received a a
potent boost
from the state department and the US ambassador
for the location in Honduras. Now what's important
about this, one, is on the record,
Biden in many other cases as well has
sort of called out these agreements except the
fact that the government doesn't actually do that.
So you could make this about lefty if
you want. The reality is this has been
the same thing through Obama's administration,
through everybody else's. The Trump's it's it's a
it's a bipartisan
issue. Foreign policy usually is if we're paying
attention.
Despite the different narratives, the same thing continues
to go forward despite who's in control.
The point though is that just to be
clear, Biden has stated he's against these things.
But at the same time, his own state
department, same with Trump's, same with everybody else's,
have allowed and continued the same process.
Now it says enshrining
Zid's in Honduran law was a messy and
undemocratic
affair from the start. Now this is foreign
policy magazine for those on on the podcast.
And, again, this is based on the watchdog
reports. It's based on the basic and provable
reality of what all the evidence shows.
After the first iteration of the zeds what
were was decreed
by president Lobo in 2,011,
to, you know, see
2 years after
the coup by the US government, the person
they put in place, Honduras' constitutional court,
the following year,
found Lobo's decree to be unlawful
because it violated their
sovereignty. Okay. So here's what's important.
They were able to put the government power
and struck structure and power that they wanted
to manipulate things. And, again, don't forget that
it's far more than just this one talking
point.
Resources, god knows what else. The point though
is that at the inside of that, there
there clearly, it seems, that their own court
had this was not controlled.
So they they had the government executive structure
in control. They were getting what they wanted
from that, but the court itself stood up
in the next year and said, no. This
is against the law. So what'd they do?
They shut it all down, went back home,
and said, sorry. You got us. We were
cheating. Hardly.
In fact, what they did
was the Honduran Congress that influenced by the
corrupt government simply replaced
those judges.
Sound familiar?
It's it's what Israel and your that new
government are doing to their broken judicial system.
It's what the US government, both sides of
it, are always trying to accomplish. It is
a game.
So all they did when they were told
it was illegal was remove those judges and
put ones in place that were openly proceed.
Yeah. Where where the US government step up
and decry the illegitimate? Nope. Didn't care. Didn't
say a word.
This continued.
And guess what? In 2013,
the revamped constitutional court, or rather the illegitimate
court that has been
deconstructed and put back in place so it
got what they wanted from it, issued a
ruling that allowed the congress to approve the
z enabling law. So at this point, you
have the people that are outspoken about this.
You got the constitutional court that said this
is completely illegal. It violates our sovereignty.
Then they remove judges, put their own people
in place, pass it, and call democracy.
And US government completely goes along with it.
Remember, the people they put in place in
it, for a brief moment, pretended like they
were concerned, but they dumped 1,000,000 of dollars
of funding into these people's hands.
I mean, this is just so shockingly corrupt.
But guess what? This is just Tuesday. It's
just another situation that's happening every moment right
now because your governments are doing this around
the world. And we're so mired and lost
in this ridiculous show of jingoism around this
stupid election that, in my opinion, has no
bearing on what actually happens in this country
or or anywhere else for that matter.
We miss these
things everywhere.
Now if you genuinely think that you're voting
for these same the the Pepsi and Coke
situation, which really now it's like Diet Pepsi
and Diet Coke, they're reframing how it looks,
but it's the same game, then I support
your choice to do so.
But if you're gonna vote for somebody you
don't want because they tell you that's all
you've got, then at least acknowledge that you've
simply given up. And if you don't wanna
acknowledge that, then come over here and recognize
that there are other choices than one or
the other.
They just don't want you to see that.
They're screening that what that other choices is
black pill no.
Exit and build or actually
participating
and abstention or any other thing or voting
third party for that matter. All of those
things are op other choices than falling in
line.
The point is that this is what they're
doing to you too, guys.
This is what they're doing everywhere.
And then you could even then ask whether
that that this or they are who you're
thinking right now. If you're thinking the US
government, maybe that's not the case.
Right? Or if you're thinking Israel or China
or Russia, maybe it's not something. The point
is that all we're seeing is the real
power structure. And it could be one of
those things or it could be some kind
of oligo
oligarch, technocratic, elitist group.
I think it's probably a combination of all
these things. And I think the Israel representation,
as Catherine agrees with in our last interview,
it's just on my mind from yesterday,
they are globalism. They represent globalism. So all
these people acting like they're fighting globalism but
act like what Israel's doing is justified are
lying to you or are incapable of seeing
how obvious it is that the very thing
they're pointing at is what they're building.
And that's for this, that's Israel, it's what
they're doing there, it's what they're the occupation,
it's the smart city, it's the sis the
UN 2030 agenda, it's all interconnected.
Now it says Lobo and Hernandez,
the 2 presidents who engineered the seed's creation.
So Hernandez was the point I think by
the way, I think I said so Hernandez
was the one after the coup. Lobo was
the one that followed.
Both clearly in line with the US agenda.
Both have since been indicted
on corruption charges in Honduras.
So think about how crazy it is that
despite all that happened, both of those people
have been indicted on corruption charges, and still
to this very moment, not only feels Prospera,
but the US government as well are blindly
well, I well, more so the state department
sort of quietly agreeing with this, but both
are allowing this to continue.
All these high minded claims about
rules based international order and human rights and
democracy
only when it applies to their interests.
It's just so shockingly dis it's so dishonest
on its face.
Lobo is currently barred from even entering the
United States due to his involvement in significant
corruption, in quotes, while Hernandez is in US
custody awaiting trial on drug trafficking weapons charges.
Now, I don't know whether I take that
at face value or not. I mean, it
either could apply. Let's not forget, just like
I said,
Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein,
or how about how about
Guaido, or any number of people that they
were like, this is the person, until suddenly
they're just no longer useful, and then they're
dropped.
Or killed.
Right? A s bin bin again, Bin Laden
and Saddam Hussein are verifiably
people that were working alongside the US government
agenda until suddenly they weren't anymore. And then
they became the biggest thing,
and they were bad people. But it very
least shows you they're willing to work alongside
the worst people to get what they want,
then throw them under the bus.
So in this case,
the fact that one is not even allowed
to enter and the other is in currently
in control, that could mean that they're just
screw them. They're we're done with them. We
got what we wanted, now let's get rid
of them. Or it could be that they're
still assets and they're being treated in a
certain way. Like, why are they I mean,
after all this time, why is he still
in custody awaiting charges? I bet you that
is something else. Or that he's not even
he's not allowed into the US? Shouldn't he
be arrested?
I don't know. You could take that for
what you will. The point is the facts
show what they did with them. Show that
it was an illegal coup, show that they
used them to get what they wanted.
And now your government just doesn't care despite
the fact that they're both indicted by the
current government of Honduras as criminals.
It says,
the, 3 zeds were eventually created in Honduras.
3 of them. The Prospera zed, which was
granted official status in 2017,
ad advertises itself as the fastest growing private
city project in the world,
home to, quote, some of the world's most
innovative new companies.
Well, again, I don't wanna get to why
I think this overlap exists, but let's not
forget what government is boasting that.
All the most startups in the world. That's
Israel.
They're the that's the biggest thing they're talking.
Silicon Valley, Tech World, startups all around the
world. And what we're showing you is that
that is just an extension of their intelligence
community. And they openly talk about that when
not on Fox News and CNN.
So my concern is that that is there
and that's part of this overlap.
Which I think is just self evident when
you look at the big picture about who's
involved with these all these agendas. The globalism,
the technocracy, everything.
But overall
2017
was when it was given the status, and
again, the point was the people pushed enough
to get somebody in power now who is
now put indicting these people, removing these zones,
and all they're doing is suing them for
not allowing the corruption to continue.
Now again,
these are some of the most innovative companies
in the world
that are that what is what they're working
within. The the really the Zeed Prospera
entity,
giving that making that home to some of
the most innovative companies in financial technology,
gene therapy,
robotic constructions, and more.
Is promoters a group of Silicon Valley self
proclaimed innovators?
We I mean, all of these things should
be generally concerning for how this is going
down. Prospera has little to show in terms
of investment or infrastructure. So think about all
of this. All of this time.
For how long? I mean, even just since
2017, but it was happening before that. But
they got official status in 2017.
And the whole point is this is about
improving infrastructure and lives of the people? Well,
apparently they've got very little and this is
written in 2024.
Very little to show for it in for
in in terms of investment or infrastructure.
With apparently only a handful of buildings even
constructed.
So how do so we need to go,
okay, what's really happening here?
I think we already went over that. I
think it's clear what this really is. Now
we can see even more so that they
don't even try to feign some kind of
building construct for the new peep no. This
is a cutout, in my opinion, for something
else.
It says it was necessarily
antagonized.
It has
successfully I've just read that. It has successfully
antagonized the surrounding community of craw Crawfish Rock.
The locals first believe the project was a
seaside resort. How how are they not even
being told what's going on?
Only to realize, according to their of their
own own,
they they just happen to realize of their
own accord
that the land around them was gradually being
gated and privatized.
Then they found out that the project planned
in 3 stages
might actually engulf their ancestral land.
To me, you guys, this is right on
the face. Everything about this is wrong. Now
it says the US ambassador to Honduras, Laura
Dogu, and this is 2024,
who has made a habit of publicly criticizing
the Honduran government on domestic policy. Why? Because
it's currently the government they don't control,
Has also rushed to the rescue of Prospera.
Despite
Biden giving his lip service to caring about
this,
they don't.
A few weeks after the US embassy tweeted
out Dogu's deputy meeting with Prospera investors in
September 2022. The US ambassador slammed the Castro
government for wanting to, quote, reduce or eliminate
investment incentives.
Oh, so all we should care about is
just taking money? Well, that's I know that's
how the government thinks. Shouldn't we care about,
you know, where that money comes from and
what they might want to accomplish? I don't
know. You might wanna ask Tim, Dave Rubin,
and Tim Pool, and all the rest of
them how that works out. The reality is,
yes, we should care where the money comes
from. Yes, we should care what their interest
might be. And the bottom line is that
all they're doing is criticizing them for not
just taking the money from an oligarch technocratic
interest that's clearly trying to take control of
their country. And guess what? The US government
knows that, and that's probably why they're pushing.
Now it says, without a doubt, the ambassador
said, the US ambassador, the Castro government's actions
are sending a clear message to companies that
they should invest elsewhere.
Yeah. Exactly. But not investments in general, but
ones that try to surreptitiously use those investments
to take control of our sovereignty. Yes. The
US State Department, in apparent disregard for Biden's
opposition or that he's saying that to make
you think something other than what they actually
wanna do, which is what I think is
the case,
the state department
has also voiced similar concerns.
Alleging that the Honduran government's decision to repeal
the seed law, quote,
further contributed to the uncertainty over the government's
commitment to investment protections
required by industries. So now you've get get
how crazy this is. This is why people,
rightly so, we've talked about this over the
years, criticize these international trees and trade agreements.
Because in most cases, they're used surreptitiously to
control other aspects. I do understand the need
for trade agreements. But the point here
is that what they're saying, using this idea
to say all you're doing is contributing to
the uncertainty around whether people can invest. Wasn't
that their prerogative? Why why do you care
so much about whether they want investment?
They pretend it's because they care about the
people of Honduras.
Clearly not. Look at what they've done to
them over the last 2 decades.
It's the same everywhere you look. We care
about people of Haiti, but we rape and
steal and rob and destroy and pretend like
we're helping.
Everywhere you look, guys, that's what they're doing.
So,
just let fine point before we go into
some other points in the overlap to Israel.
Jacobin put it like this. And this is
as a a recent article. This was
2024, I believe. 2023. End end of 2023.
Billionaires are suing the Honduran government for blocking
their profit making scheme.
Simply just wanted you to highlight again, the
Peter Thiel backed firm Prospera
is suing the country for constraining its profits.
I just think that's so crazy on its
face.
Not even getting in to what is actually
going on behind it. That alone is all
it just shows you the new structure here.
That you can surreptitiously
create some contract with an illegitimate government, then
use that to essentially take control of the
entire country. Which is what seems to be
about to happen.
Now, on Honduras Prospera Inc, which is the
first
name for the company,
it and this is just a search on
the on on, the search engine from Brave.
It is a bellow a Delaware Delaware based
company incorporated in 2021, except the company's business
address is actually Washington DC.
Okay. It's that seems like a little bit
of a weird shift, but the old overall,
it could be nothing. But the it's important
to recognize that it's DC. That matters, guys.
That matters.
And it says Honduras Propera or Prospera
is a trademark of New Way Capital LLC,
which may I didn't maybe nothing. I wanna
look in to see who that is and
what that means.
Special development zone.
So here
is the SEC filing form d for Honduras
Prospera LLC. Again, just to show you that
it is clearly Washington DC, but the main
point down here, and that's every one of
them,
is just to find out who the CEO
is. Who is Eric a Brimann.
So I looked into him just to see
the overlap. Here's his Twitter account if you'd
like to check it out. Founder and CEO
of Prospera. Very small following.
Now I looked into this and one thing
that I found on his on his page
that's what I was saying earlier briefly. This
is posted on,
July 15, 2024.
We're building another village. So you realize this
is well after the lawsuit,
well after the repealed law. So how do
you fit this into it? Now there and
realize there's already 3 of them. This is
about a second one on Roatan, the actual
island that Prospera is already on.
Okay. So isn't this exactly what Crawfish Rock
is talking about? Yeah. They're like, don't worry.
We're not gonna here they are. We're openly
stating, and he retweeted himself,
this one's called nomad apparently.
We're gonna take more territory. Well, how is
that possible exactly? How are you gonna take
or make another one when the law has
been repealed, so you can't do that? You're
literally suing them because you know that and
they're trying to take profits away from your
first so but you're just gonna make a
new one?
The point has to be taken clearly that
they don't care about the law, or rather,
more on point
or to the point, they see themselves as
above the law.
Just like the US government. You know why?
Because I frankly think this is the US
government.
Or or if you wanna look at it
another way, that the US government is this
technocracy.
That's important to think about. How do you
how in the world would they put even
tweet this out? Sharing videos about how they're
going to make a new thing, knowing either
they know something we don't, they're gonna force
another coup and put the thing back in
place, or they just don't care that it's
currently illegal. And the 2 people in government
power that put that in place are currently
indicted in court charges for doing it.
I mean, this is a wildly dishonest
and on its face illegal venture,
and they don't care.
Think about the impunity that shows you.
Now, interestingly, I found his way his substack.
Or excuse me, medium.
And there's about 5 6 5 or 6
posts entire. And it's entirely I've let me
look real quick to make sure I'm correct
on that.
Yeah. So 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
So 6 total. 6 total. Going back to
2018.
Talking about the Honduras in 2018.
This one says, where there's demand, these Honduran
women supply. That sure sounds lovely.
Well, the last 2, which ended the last
one was January 17, 2018. Guess what it
says?
Lessons from Israel. The startup nation part 1.
Lessons from Israel. The startup nation part 2.
Yeah. Because it's such a startup nation. Right?
And the idea if you will if you
look into these, which you should, read them
for yourself,
it's praising what Israel is. Every part of
it. Foreign aid, immigration,
hostile neighbors. Talk about Palestinians. And the point
with the point they're making is that we're
learning lessons from what Israel is doing to
take those lessons into our prosperity community.
Read it for yourself.
That's pretty damn concerning with what we currently
see happening and what we really should understand
Israel's Zionist government is and what the entire
Israel state project is as a Zionist
occupation, ethnic cleansing, genocidal concept.
That's not that that's not criticizing Jews or
Israelis specifically,
but anyone,
Christian, Jew, or otherwise, who are taking part
in that Zionist agenda. The bottom line,
part 1 and part 2 should show you
that there is a little bit of an
at least an overlapping mentality with what they're
doing. Now that alone could just mean that
he's enamored by the
ethnic cleansing apartheid
concept of what Israel Israel is. That alone
should be concerning.
Now another point I found interesting was and
that this one I haven't been able to
fully verify, but I'll just include it and
then we'll show you the next points. This
is Honduras Prospera trademark details for Justia trademarks.
It lists their lawyer
as Nadia
Semer D. Gevia.
Now everywhere else I looked, they couldn't find
this connection, but weirdly enough, the brave search
engine
says that she's an Israeli attorney.
But, again, to be clear, nowhere else was
able to find that. So let's be clear
on this, that these search engine,
you know, whether it's Grok or whatever else,
these things can be unreliable. Let's not forget
that.
But it's interesting.
Who knows why? But she says, an Israeli
attorney with extensive experience in intellectual property and
in house corporate law.
Here is under
oh, and this was the other, where was
that actually?
Where I have that.
Shoot. I forget what it said that. Well,
any case, the oh, I was gonna show
you guys that.
Make sure you saw that that's not just
me making that up. Was it right here?
Shoot.
Well, let me just search for this real
quick. I wanted to show you the,
Neeway
overlap. Because that's what this the Nee Way
Capital LLC.
Oh, I did show you that already. I
think I closed it.
The point was that remember I said the
trade it's trademark under Nee Way
LLC.
So Prospera Honduras was the name, but it
was a trademark by this company. So, again,
maybe it means nothing. But I figured let's
look at it, right, and see what it
says. And I found the COO of Neeway
Capital is Nicholas b Jenkins.
And that per now based on the research,
it seemed see, it seems to suggest that
might even just be an alias and that's
that's not a real name. But overall, it
may it shows that Niwe Capital has a
central location in Israel.
Again, though, that's very common with a lot
of these overlapping companies. So take that for
what you will, it could mean nothing.
So that alone, to me, shows an interesting
overlap with where this goes. But this is
what I found most interesting.
Sarah Abdallah highlights, which we I think we
pointed out as well. In May 3rd, 2023,
guess what Honduras did?
They withdrew their ambassadors from Israel
in protest of their genocide in Gaza.
November 3, 2023.
Right? So they're
being sued
in the upward right toward the end of
this year or of 2023.
Remember that we're talking about this, and here's
the article from from the lawsuit, what that
might mean for Honduras, for Jan for in
January 24, 2024 that actually began right before
in the end of the year before.
But all of this now is resurging, because
we're gonna show you next the idea that
the current administration is telling you. In 2009,
the same people involved are now
taking over again. They're now pushing again to
take over a new coup of this country.
It's exactly what we said. So I think
the reason that
Prospera and t Peter Thiel's company and the
the larger agenda is already building a new
one, even though they don't care, the laws
don't apply, because I think they I think
they think they're gonna get control again.
But I find it almost impossible to miss
that right before a lot of this spins
out, that Honduras had pulled their ambassadors from
Israel because of their genocide.
And on top of that,
right after that happens,
December 7, 2023.
Right?
Elon Musk
says, boom. Starlink is now in Honduras.
Which again, could just be a coincidence.
It could be an overlapping thing going on.
But what I think, if you want my
honest opinion,
which is always what I give you,
is that we can clearly see, as I'll
play you this next,
they are about to be cooed again because
they're losing control of one of his major
interests.
What does Starlink usually happen? Overlaps with the
military objectives. We see them using that in
Gaza right now to help the genocide.
So all of a sudden, right after they
pull their
ambassadors from Israel,
we see this new push for a coup.
We see Elon Musk step in giving Starlink
to Honduras,
but really, arguably, whoever he wants to give
control of that to, probably just and here's
the main point, actually, before I just say
it without the point is that they're already
doing this.
This is August 2024.
Prospera, the eccentric private liber libertarian, which is
not what it is, enclave,
who are already using Elon Musk's Starlink satellite.
So the satellite's there, but I don't think
for Honduras' current government that doesn't agree with
what they're doing. I think it's there for
the control structure that's being used through the
Prospera entity, and I think we're about to
see another coup take place in Honduras.
I hope I'm wrong.
Overall, though, we need to recognize how alarming
all of this is. This major push and
all these different overlapping technocrat oligarchs that seem
to have control,
regardless of the governments, all over the world.
Or at the very least alarming influence using
both a combination of kinetic military force and
also surreptitious
propaganda, psychological
operations, that is the 5th generation warfare. That's
the partisan psychological warfare that we're talking about.
So let's play these.
So this is her speaking.
This is the current president of Honduras,
Castro, warns, quote, the same dark internal and
external forces of 2,009,
which is the US government and whoever else
they're working with, with the complicity of the
national and international corporate media,
are reorganizing
in our country to stage a new coup.
In relation to the video from 2013,
published today on social media,
I condemn any kind of a negotiation
between drug traffickers and politicians.
So that what they're trying to do, like
always, is push the idea that they're somehow
overrun by darko traffickers. But remember, the only
reason that problem got where it was before
they took control and, oh, look. From what
I know, they are overlapped with. Maybe they
are drug traffickers. My point though is to
highlight the fact that the US government
and the coup government they put there,
they exploded the things they're only now suddenly
concerned about. In fact, during the time, they
only gave them money and support. But now
that they're not influencing the power structure, or
at least as it as it seems to
be, now they suddenly care about those things.
And now they're gonna call them out and
say, look. We need to get them out
of power even though they got to the
place they did because they allowed it in
the first place, the US government.
This is as I expressed in previous days.
After the threats of the US ambassador,
accusing the joint chief of staff
of the of the armed forces
and the former minister of defense
of being drug traffickers.
I mean, again, me while being open allies
with Colombia that has the largest export of
of cocaine in the world. Nobody talks about
that because that's these are hypocrites, guys.
This is I ratify that the peace and
international security of the republic are at risk.
The plan to destroy my democratic and socialist
government, which right there,
I guarantee,
regardless of how illegal and and against the
interest of the people everything is that's happening
here, there will be people on one side
of the paradigm that will immediately go, I'm
on the other side. And that is how
simple this is.
All governments, democracy, social, and communism, whatever else
you wanna call it, are simply governments,
peep entities
that are collecting power at the top as
fast as they can.
Look at what's happening in our country, and
neither of those people running currently are socialist
or communist. They're all oligarch authoritarian capitalist concepts
or technocrats if you really understand where this
is going.
And, by the way, as I've shown many
times, their plans are they're literally all saying
the same things right now, and you all
just think of something different. Biometric control structures,
immigration, Israel support, all of it.
And the next electoral process is underway.
The same dark internal and external forces of
2009,
with the complicity of the national and the
media, are staging another coup. And the people
must repel.
A plan against crime being executed
demonstrates our political commitment in favor of extradition.
But I will not allow
a selective use of the treaty in force
with the United States
to dismantle the armed forces.
Meanwhile, we realized, meanwhile, they have a little,
like, a little mini state within the state
that already has its own member, courts, laws,
jurisdiction,
financial setup, everything.
So how easy it would be to just
kinda swap into that being the main control
structure?
I mean, it wouldn't be easy really, but
it would be easier than just destroying everything
and starting anew.
To overthrow our government, to destroy the elections,
they're saying.
So right there, the it's really quickly. It
says the request of the attorney general's office
to act to exercise drastic actions in all
the cases presented here without any selectivity in
the fight against drug activity.
Like, so basically saying, you know, that that
they want them to go in a certain
direction. They're gonna go through the processes like
normal. I respectfully request the National Congress where
my party is in a clear minority
to reform all the legal norms so the
security forces of the state, currently limited,
is able to fight with force against the
organized criminal activity. Now they're gonna use that,
turn around and say that's them doing the
same thing they're doing, which maybe it is.
Either way,
point being, we see the past. We see
what they've done. We see what they're involved
with. None of this is in the interest
of the people on the ground. Maybe neither
of them are. That's certainly part of the
conversation.
But we need, especially as Americans, to recognize
what your government's doing.
Not I mean, if they're the one if
they're the ones acting like it's about rules
based order and law,
human rights,
then we need to recognize that everything you're
doing is counter to that. Regardless of what
you think the other side I mean, here's
what's funny about it. Right now, you can
almost hear the argument, oh, the they're worse.
Is what you might hear. Well, they're a
socialist communist government, so the US government has
to do things a little bit outside to
stop them.
So, yeah, let lesser evils, you might say?
Funny how that always seems to come back
up. You're being played is the point.
Says able to fight
in order to a new minister of defense,
attorney, attorney
Rishi Mandakata
to provide all the tools and technology required
by the armed forces to prevent Honduras from
continuing to be used as a bridge for
the trafficking of drugs. That's the real point,
as we can clearly see,
that are consumed by the tons of the
countries
of destination.
Next,
another point where she's speaking elsewhere, I'll just
read it. It says, 2009, the US backed
a military coup in Honduras. Today, 1 month
after Honduras angered the US and here's another
point. It's gonna fall right into this the
idea of people that wanna only hear certain
points by establishing ties with China.
President Castro warns that the same figures that
contributed to the 2009 coup are once again
trying to destabilize the government. Now if all
you care about is that communism bad, China
bad guy, that's the only thing that rules
your view of the world, then maybe you
only care about that. Maybe you blind yourself
to the fact that your government is working
alongside a genocide or actually using and carrying
out a genocide or or destabilizing
countries for the sole benefit of their technocratic
elitists
and usually at the counter hearing your interests.
And in fact, by the way, acting alongside
many of the very governments you think you're
not agreeing with or that you're working against
because they are x, y, and z, or
they have these labels behind the scenes, happily
working with them.
They're laughing at you when you think of
the those are the only things that matter.
Now I'm not saying China good guy or
that we should support, and I am against
all of these governments. I think all of
them are part of this problem.
But the bottom line is that the people
of Honduras
need to make their own choices.
In every context, every go now you could
argue their their government is manipulating them, but
that's for them to manage.
For the even if you think the US
government might be able to make it better
for them, the point is that's not even
what they're trying to do. They're trying to
exploit that vulnerability
so they can be the one taking advantage
of the people. That's what they're actually doing
and our history is very clear on it.
Overall,
China connection, social or whatever, it is undeniably
clear that this is not even to do
with either of those things. This is about
a technocratic control structure that is utilizing all
of these things and our division and our
bickering about 2 party politics to take control,
possibly even from your government.
But meanwhile, we're so mired in that BS
that we don't even see it happening.
Now, on that point,
let's talk about
where this goes in the current situation. Now
re realistically,
shouldn't well, this shouldn't take that much longer.
I was hoping to be under an hour
today, but we're hour 30. The point is
to what we've already talked about and how
this ties into other conversations. Now remember, we
already talked about the Israel side of this,
which I think is a very clear overlap
to what's going on in Honduras
and elsewhere with these, US and these entities
are say, I mean, same point, by the
way. You could easily argue that the UK
is involved with many of the US agendas
around the world. That's not some focal over
focal point on Brits simply because they're very
clearly tied up with what they're all working
together on. And Israel is a central I
mean, that's the key strategic ally. There's a
reason that they're overlapped with all of these
genocides and all of these regime changes because
they're all aiming in the same direction. You
could argue one influences one more than the
other. That's for you to decide. I think
it's obvious.
But in this case, the point is to
see, in a general sense, outside of Honduras,
that and that this is the art the
show we put out on August 2024, the
Israeli election interference and psychological operation industrial complex.
Remember, this story was about the guy here
who was caught by the Guardian in other
platforms
for boasting and provably doing so,
and he's an Israeli asset, don't forget, on
the record
influencing elections, including in the United States.
He boasts that they've influenced in which means
they put their person in power in 27
presidential elections around the world. Think about what
that means. Honduras, for example,
that's what we're talking about.
And this is an ongoing and on top
of that, they've got the massive bot farms
and everything else they're using to influence your
opinion.
We've also talked about how the Israel specifically
uses the 2 party illusion, as I just
described, to divide, destabilize,
and control policy,
but also outside of the US.
Now here is the other one we wrote
on August 4th or put out on his
4th. The US Israeli 5th generation warfare. Israeli
bots, destabilizing propaganda, digital regime change. Now that
has to do with just the digital aspect
of it. We saw that with the attempt
by Elon Musk with Venezuela to kind of
shift the narrative in their direction and it
didn't work. Because they got caught lying like
45 times right away. That that's not my
opinion. It was embarrassing. They had to delete
tweets, there was their own Twitter community noted
many of the things Elon put out. They're,
no. Those are air conditioners. Those aren't ballot
boxes. Oops. Nobody cared. Nobody corrected the record.
That's I mean, they have a right to
lie. That's free speech. But we need to
recognize the kind of power they're wielding.
That's not to say the same things that
they're saying from some kind of internal political
dynamic, which of your government, you might call
that left versus right.
That that we need to control this because
he's lying. Nope. That's that's a limited hangout.
The point is that we need free speech
is absolute.
That's a static always reality, but we need
to then recognize
that because of the and on top of
that, meaning that and proving that Twitter's not
that. They are censoring. So right there is
the first part to start at.
But that they are using these platforms to
initiate much larger agendas,
and that has to matter to us,
as well as the rise of partisan psychological
warfare.
Now, all of that said about Honduras and
the technocratic influence around all these things, let
me play what Ben Swan said about Brazil
and and Twitter.
And I'll give you my thoughts possibly as
we go through most likely at the end.
It's only about a minute, I think, or
minute 40.
Now, obviously, the point was before. I think
it's
quite evident that Brazil Brazil is censoring.
And I think that you can by the
way, what's funny about that is that right
now, Twitter is censoring things around Israel.
And they'll tell you, well, you know, hate
speech or criticizing. You can't say these words.
Okay. So all you're really acknowledging is that
they have their line that Twitter will censor
for.
So isn't that the same real conversation? And
I disagree with Twitter. They're they're censoring and
that's not okay.
But the same point we made for Brazil,
where they're they just have a different line.
And all of it's did not okay. That's
the point. All of them are censoring and
we should all disagree with that. But it's
weird how we just decide what lines are
okay. Right?
Oh, they made a bad joke about Trump's
assassination. Remove them from society. You know, it's
hypocritical is the point.
So when you when you watch this video,
think about this from the other light. Recognizing
that I do think that it's obvious Brazil
is censoring, but maybe there's another flavor to
this story about how Elon Musk is playing
a part in this larger technocratic
influence about other countries. And maybe Twitter is
being used as a vehicle for that. And
maybe there's a reason that Brazil is having
a problem with that. And I'm not trying
to rationalize or justify the censorship. I'll say
it for the 4th time. They're censoring and
nobody should be okay with that.
But at least ask yourself whether there's another
dynamic to this story because this does have
to do with Starlink as well.
Has been banned in Brazil and Elon Musk
is furious. But the question for us, could
the ban come to the US next? This
battle began between x and Brazil when earlier
this year, a judge by the name of
Alexander de Moreas
ordered the shutting down of accounts accused of
spreading misinformation.
Elon Musk
So I will stop right there because the
point is, right there, nobody should be okay
with that. Like, even if the proof comes
out that these were bots put out by
Israel or Elon Musk or whatever else, to
explicitly influence the outcome of the election,
that's still censorship to me in the sense
of shutting down the platform.
Because the individuals on that platform
have a right to that free speech on
the platform. But at the same time, when
it comes to them saying you have to
get rid of these accounts,
the point is that if they are government
accounts, that changes the story, doesn't it?
But we don't know that. And so we
have to leave it at that point. If
they were individuals,
then that's that's a problem. But we have
to recognize
that if this was the other way around,
if this was the United States or whatever
else that makes make that works for you.
This is this was
let's just say it's Elon Musk.
And he's saying, I'm removing these accounts because
they're Chinese state backed
agents. Do you think the Republicans would cry
foul?
Obviously not. And you need to recognize how
simple that point is. I'm not saying that
Brazil's the good guy. I don't know is
the point. But the reality is that if
that was happening here and Elon Musk was
claiming these were Russian is Chinese
state backed actors pretending to be people, which,
by the way, they keep doing. They keep
deleting all these bots. We oh, we lost
a 100 followers today. Maybe they were bots,
we don't know. They claim they are. Really,
we know that Israel through CHEQ is flooding
the platform with bots, they're not removing. My
point is if you're okay with that,
shouldn't you at least be objective enough to
go, maybe that's what Brazil's doing? That they
were removing accounts because they think that they're
influencing by government? Or they're using it to
censor their own people because they're just other
government that wants to control what you think?
All of that is all possible simultaneously is
the point.
Says that x was told to ban opposition
politicians
from posting, and he refused.
Sorry for the low volume. That's just how
low the video is. I'll I'll I'll wait
to speak to the end then since it's
a hard change on the volume. So let
me go back and start it over.
But the question for us, could the ban
come to the US next?
This battle began between x and Brazil when
earlier this year, a judge by the name
of Alexander de Morais
ordered the shutting down of accounts accused of
spreading misinformation.
Elon Musk says that X was told to
ban opposition politicians
from posting that he refused.
Moreyas opened a criminal investigation into Musk himself
in April of this year. The company then
posted documents that they said threatened their attorney
with arrest if it did not, quote, comply
with censorship
orders, end quote. So Morais gave Musk until
Thursday of last week to appoint a new
lawyer. He didn't do it. So Morais shut
X down beginning on Saturday.
Brazil's supreme court upheld that decision on Monday
with one judge stating that x seems to
believe it's above the law. Responding to reporters,
Brazil's president, Lula, said that the world is
not obliged to put up with Musk's far
right ideology
just because he's rich. Well, x is down
in Brazil even though people are still able
to access it using a VPN
at risk of being fined over
$8,000 a day. So in the US, some
are celebrating the shutdown of x. People like
Keith Ellison, Tim Wall's attorney general in Minnesota.
He posted
Brazil or thank you Brazil on x, leading
to a fury of backlash from Musk's supporters.
Could Ellison's
enthusiasm be a sign of what's to come
here in the US? Well, as for Musk,
his fight in Brazil is not quite over
yet. See, one of his other companies, Starlink,
has stated that they will not comply with
the order to block x, leaving the company
open now to sanctions.
It's all very interesting.
Right? The whole thing is very the overlaps.
Above the law, the idea of sort of
a technocrat and using it's it's interesting.
And you obviously, if you're being objective, you
can see the overlaps to the situation, but
they very well could be different. It could
be simply Brazil censoring people and Elon Musk
standing up for free speech, except he's not
even doing that here with other things, but
we'll just ignore those contradictions.
Obviously, I don't think, in any case, that
he is a free speech savior. In fact,
it's very obvious the opposite.
But it doesn't mean that he's necessarily wrong
in the context of of what's going on
in Brazil. But what stands out to me
like, again, first, the idea of, like, the
VPN.
The fact that they're trying to legalize that,
that's a larger agenda that goes well beyond
that one situation that I think is in
the interest of the technocratic agenda and and
great reset and everything else. The the and
don't forget, Elon Musk was a champion around
that. We're gonna deanonymize. You can't be an
an anonymous on this platform. Remember that? That
was the whole point of the verification, which,
by the way, still uses Israeli Authentic's biometric
scan,
or they take your biometrics
from the
process
despite his claim that they wouldn't use that
anymore.
That's a lie. Still there. It's it's I
I'll show you the article in a second.
But the idea of removing that is is
a problem. No matter what the whatever what
no matter what Twitter may be doing for
them to say they can't use a VPN,
that's just a violation of their freedom, in
my opinion, in an international sense.
But the other point is all the all
the pushback.
Walls and the rest of them, thank you.
You know? Like, I look. I think it's
almost
absurd,
comical, ridiculous that we have to see people
standing up and acting like, you know, free
speech is limited. Like, this game they're playing,
it seems very coordinated to me. And it
could just be that they're that bad because
they are.
Kamala and Walls are ridiculous.
Even more so by the fact that they're
pretending that somehow you can you've you've outrun
your free speech permit or whatever the dumb
thing they're saying is about. Elon Musk has
no longer got the rights to free speech.
It seems almost
cartoonishly coordinated to where we go, okay. I
don't care if I'm a democrat or not.
Like, that's just dumb. And over here, at
least they're saying the right things out loud
despite their track record, so I'm gonna lean.
And that's happening.
Everybody it's it's very interesting to me. Despite
their principles around what they believe in, they
suddenly go, you know, it's just it's very
strange dynamic.
But overall, I think what it shows me
is that there's at least an opening here,
a possibility that both of these things are
happening at the same time. And if you
fully see what these people are and the
overlapping connections with Elon Musk and the rest
of them, with every single part of the
Great Reset, every single I mean, don't forget,
Elon Musk is currently a government contractor.
If I remember correctly,
Biden is currently the executive branch.
So, by default, Elon Musk currently works for
Biden's administration.
But we don't care about those things, right?
Because, oh, he's against the The bottom line
is that they're your government. And he works
for that government. And he's a technocrat. He's
a billionaire. He's an oligarch. And he is
very clearly using this platform to walk you
right into these things. That's my opinion.
So with what's going on there I mean,
you could even take a step further back
and say, maybe this is all coordinated. Maybe
we work with Brazil and everybody else included.
I mean, I don't know. But if you're
incapable of asking those questions with what else
we're seeing, again, I think you're just choosing
to, in a way, bury your head about
what you want, you know, the hopium around
the idea. And, again, I I hope you're
right.
I really hope you're right. Sadly, I think
the evidence proves otherwise.
Now here's one that I wanted to go
over reasonably quickly. And, again, I I've mentioned
this a few times. I'll include the article
in general, but it's a it's a substack
from from,
Majid Nawaz.
Telegram CEO and honeypot Intel asset Pavel Durob
arrested and charged in France. Now we've talked
about this many times.
The point in this article, as he says,
the same kind of thing. That both these
things can be happening simultaneously.
That, yes, the fact that he's being shut
down and the censorship around it should be
outrageous.
But it does not change the fact that
in his mind, and I agree with the
evidence here, that it's really an Israeli honeypot
asset.
That's what this that's what he argues this
is. And the evidence is pretty clear. The
point being that they're using this to help
drive the larger agenda. And one of that
is, ar arguably making you think that they're
all on the side of the free speech
savior concept and Elon Musk is standing up
to work with them. And let's not forget
Telegram or even things like WhatsApp. There's many
different examples over the years that show that
they're not not only that literally none of
them are actually secure. As,
the late McAfee,
John McAfee said, you know, there is no
privacy in this context. They all can see
I think we've proven this over the years.
But they've also been used for,
like, geolocation purposes. We talked about the recent
assassination by Israel. What that was the case.
But he says, the CEO, the honeypot app
Telegram, Intel asset, has been arrested.
Netanyahu simp, Elon Musk, has typically intervened on
Twitter.
He says, seemingly oblivious to his own hypocrisy
as usual. Right? The guy the game of
saying,
you know,
censorship is bad, and then just completely being
the same thing. It's it's ridiculous.
But it says others online have met this
development with much naive protestation over the loss
of western civilization.
Candaceowans, kim.com. He says the reality of the
situation as shall be revealed receipts in this
post is that Pavel Dharav is a billionaire
intel asset running a honey pot operation while
deceiving others into believing they are on the
encrypted platform. So that his private company has
access to all their data,
excuse me, posted in the belief that it
was an end to end encrypted.
Telegram was not encrypted, he says.
He says, du Durov arrested by Macron's France
is clearly politically driven, but this does not
absolve him from trend of responsibility
for the crimes of which he stands accused.
Crimes against minors must not be ignored simply
because we happen to agree politically with the
accused.
He goes, Paul, Paul, Pavel Durov has been
charged on 12 counts of the following. It's
for WikiLeaks,
including
providing cryptology services aiming to ensure
confidentiality
without certified declaration and six counts of complicity
with alleged criminal activity by Telegram users.
Among the most concerning of these 12 charges
were complicity,
possessing pornographic images of minors,
complicity, dissemination, offer, or provision of pornographic images
of minors by an by an organized group.
Now what's interesting to me is in any
other context, this is something that is being
used to mobilize bloggers of the right to
act against their own interests.
But but when it used by Elon to
counter the other side, we just look the
other way. I mean, it just shows you
that the tea party politics are used to
constantly, like I just said, drive you to
act against your own interests because you're on
team sport politics. Right? I'm on this side,
so I'll pretend that doesn't matter. Or like
we saw with Trump. Don't point that out.
It makes Trump look bad. Or vice versa.
They're all doing that. We can't say that
about Kamal, you're gonna let Trump win.
So were it to lie?
Yes. That's what they want from you.
Macron has protested that it was not political.
This is obviously false. Macron, the globalist, lost
the French election yet remains in power, which
is actually crazy. I've mentioned that briefly. There's
It's some It's it's through some political manipulation
about the some nuance thing that has never
happened before and they were they were resigned,
but they're still technically in power. It's ridiculous.
Frankly, it makes zero sense in the real
like, if if this was what we pretend
it is, this wouldn't be the case. Same
with our country and anywhere else, guys. What
we're beginning to see is the illusion fall
down. And I think by design, I think
they want us to become comfortable with the
fact that we live under technocrat oligarch authoritarians
that are deciding for us what will happen.
And that's what's always been happening, you see?
And now they're just slowly revealing that to
you because they're coming back out of the
light or out of the shadows.
The only reason more,
well, I think in general, I think the
point and make sure you read through this
because it's
in in general, I I added a timeline
on what I'm gonna aim for today, so
it'll be under 2 hours. But I mentioned
this already in a previous show.
And the reality is what he's saying.
Right now, I'm getting into the allegations of
a honey pot, but simply that we can
have both things exist simultaneously where the crimes
are being accused of
can be there and should be acknowledged.
At the same time,
it could also be censorship.
The problem is that because of the 2
party politics around all of this, we are
blinding ourselves to one side or the other.
Now to be clear,
the idea of anonymity
and and confidentiality, these things obviously matter. But
the what the problem is here is that
this is an action from the the
owner of the platform
to allow that specifically for these concepts.
Adapting it for that as opposed to just
having a blanket concept that they're all actively
using.
Well, at least that's the argument. The point
being that these things need to be fleshed
out. At the end of the day,
I think that it matters that both can
exist in the same conversation, whether it's Twitter
in Brazil, whether it's HODL, all of it.
And I think that they're playing
the just like I said before.
These entities, oligarchs, governments, they don't care about
the law. They don't care about your rights.
But they will always use the fact that
you want them to care about those things
to manipulate you into a certain position, knowing
that you care about them.
That's a problem. And we can't allow that
to make us not care anymore, which is
kinda where that's going.
Now on on the same vein, here's Elon
Musk saying, Malay is bringing prosperity to Argentina.
Here's Mario Nafal saying, Malay surpasses expectations with
strong economic performance. Right? Because that's all that
really matters, right, whether the government's making money?
That's that's what they love you to think.
The stock market's out of control. Well, we're
all starved to death, but it's okay because
we got what we wanted from you.
That's kind of the game being played. My
point is not even this entirely, but here's
Elon going, he's the one. You mean that
Zionist pretend libertarian?
Uh-huh.
Here's an article from 1 month ago. Argentina
will use AI to predict future crimes,
but experts worry for citizens' rights. Yeah. Have
you have you not heard Whitney talking about
this extensively? Like, we're we're talking about,
Bill Barr from Trump's
administration initiating this or Palantir being the focal
point for how this is being executed in
the United States and around the world. We're
talking about
medical or just precrime.
We're talking about they're telling you, we're gonna
let you know before you commit crimes using
artificial intelligence.
How in the world is this libertarian?
Doesn't matter though, because they made money using
the word libertarian. Same thing we're seeing in
Honduras and everywhere else. Or Twitter, it's all
the same game. That's what I'm seeing right
now. Then we're watching the new structure get
put out there, and eventually the government facade
probably won't even matter.
Hope I'm wrong.
Now here's that post he put out saying
he continue oh, this is a different one.
Oh, no. It's the same one. Continues to
defy critics with an economy that has outperformed.
And he says, including aiming for a NATO
global partnership.
Right? Yay. Libertarianism,
democracy, freedom, NATO. Wait. Hold on. That's not
that's not how that's supposed to go. Right?
Yeah. We're we're all the libertarians who would
freak out about the idea of proposing
global NATO partnerships.
My point is, I can't believe,
one, that anybody is still pretending they're libertarian
while supporting somebody doing these things. And I'm
not even saying I'm libertarian. I'm just I
can acknowledge the contradiction here.
Or that people who don't know the difference
are out there pushing you in that direction,
or even 3rd, that they know that this
is the direction, and they're still using libertarian
concepts to get you into a position to
accept these things.
Here's Anya pom propel,
Pirampel saying, why is NATO expansion based now?
By the way, I hate these new based
and these trendy terms they're using. It's just
so silly to me. Maybe I'm the new
old guy that's like, that's a dumb word.
But I it's just funny to me. And
even more so, what kind of grosses me
out is to see these, you know, I'm
a new hip politician. That's based. It's like
you're an idiot. Get out of the way.
I yeah. I I think I think the
word's silly anyway, but I think it's funny
when you see people trying to look hip
and trendy like Elon and the rest of
them do all the time. Anyway, it says,
do we want a Ukrainian style proxy war
on American on the American continent? I sure
don't.
The point is that NATO expansion or NATO
in general, I mean, that that is remember,
post World War excuse me. Post 911,
the initiation of, I believe, article 5 is
how this started. This that is the world
military. That's what that has been used for.
1 you attack 1, you attack all. That's
why they're trying to add Ukraine and argue
that they that that's why we have to
make this a NATO war, which it already
kinda de facto is.
The bottom line is how in the world
is this what freedom anything wants? Or people
that are libertarians or anything overlapping with what
they all pretend they're fighting for.
It just it doesn't it lines up with
more government and more control
over your life.
Now, we've talked about the overlapping biometric discussion.
Now, this is the same thing with the
the technocratic
drive. So we've talked about other countries being
driven in different directions, but what we're seeing
in this country, from the American perspective,
is the very person building that fake utopia
that's meant to take control of Honduras with
another coup about to come, is the person
literally, seemingly financing this this at least the
primarily on paper Vance,
but openly supporting Trump's entire push. And then
we've got Elon Musk that now has just
seemingly publicly accepted a position on Trump's campaign.
And as Whitney wrote, the man behind Trump's
VP pick, which is teal, is worse than
you think.
That's Palantir. That is your biometric surveillance. That
is your world server. That is your pandemic
surveillance.
We talked about the co opting of Bitcoin.
Same kind of direction. We saw them speak
in the same way. Bitcoin, Nashville, Peter Thiel,
Donald Trump, and Rumble. All this new ecosystem
being built. They're co opting all the actual
freedom direction platforms.
Here is Trump play and I I think
I grabbed that. I'll just play it again
since it's important if you haven't heard it.
But the idea of Trump openly telling you
that we're gonna make a biometric tracking system.
And realize I played the I showed you
the article in the last show about in
2017,
guess who all jumped on that? Silicon Valley
entrepreneur. They jumped on the idea of a
biometric wall and they started building all of
these things. It it's not about the wall,
it's about everything. And they made that clear
in the article. It's about biometric tracking for
you in this country and everywhere else. That's
what that's building.
Here's what he said. Alright.
We will finally complete the biometric entry exit
visa tracking system, which we need
desperately.
In system which we need desperately.
That this system is in place
and I will tell you it will be
on land,
it will be on sea, It will be
in air. We will have a proper tracking
sys
Why does any Republican want that? How was
that even remotely in line with what any
Republican was saying
30 seconds ago? Right before right during the
pandemic. I mean, even before.
Like, if just before he even made that
speech, I would've argued they would've said no
if you asked him. But Trump said,
air too. Right? Because immigrants are, you know,
flying on jumbo jets across no. The point
is about you being controlled
under the guise of whatever they tell you
is the big boogeyman at the moment. Or,
you know, immigration in the context of the
SAVE Act and getting you to sleepwalk into
a digital ID as Biden rolls out the
mobile driver's license which removes the other options
that were on that bill,
which only leaves real ID compliant identification, which
is exactly what I told you would happen.
And now you're being driven a digital ID
without even knowing it, or maybe you do
and just don't care. But on this other
clip or other post is Trump saying the
vaccine saved lives and still does and it's
good and nobody dies and they take it,
which is a complete lie. Or him saying
that Israel should control congress and rightly should
rightly so did before and should again. That's
what he promises in 3 different videos. Here
he is saying that we need to control
the Internet and maybe shut it down a
little bit because of bad people and work
with Bill Gates to do it. It's right
on the record. Here he is saying we
should take the guns first, deal through process
later. All these things should matter to somebody
who cares about consistency and
actual principle.
And most of these are still his open
stance right now.
I I frankly, I think all of them
are, but open stance is my point. He
still says many of them right now. So
weaponized migration and experimentation is one of the
reasons they're being were being manipulated. And Israel
is a
will a obvious
surface level part of the weaponized migration. They're
promoting it right now. Here, the Save Act,
the Real ID, and to ID 2020 discussion,
showing you how it's a Trojan horse digital
ID because of weaponized migration.
And the fact, again, I'll include this article
that Twitter is still using Authentix right now.
An Israeli unit 8200
intelligence based asset that is literally working with
a vast majority of their intelligence in general
that has just happened to you know, I'll
do a I'll I'll come over here and
help Americans with their identification for Twitter, you
know, because we're kind like that. Hardly.
That's that's Israel and the government and their
intelligence assets taking your biometrics through Twitter and
Elon allowing that, Which, by the way, is
still happening. Because when Censored Man called it
out, made it you know, he's got a
huge platform on Twitter. And I was retweeting
it, we were talking about it, we were
making this point long before that got a
lot of attention.
Elon Musk was forced to acknowledge it. And
he said okay, sorry. We'll use Stripe instead.
Guess what never happened?
You're still being used, but it Authentix is
still taking your biometric data through Twitter. Right
now.
Now, to rapidly end here.
The problem is that we're seeing this new
this re this facelift for the 2 party
illusion.
Here's what Doge Designer says, and don't forget
Doge has been something that Elon has leaned
into for a long time. It's a meme
coin. It says, it's no longer republican versus
democrat. It's America versus communism.
Same old thing.
Trump or communism. It's just so embarrassing.
Like, on its face. And so this is
why people around the world who aren't immersed
in this game look at us and these
people are children.
Neither of these people are even remotely
in
close to communism.
Again,
all of these governments,
whatever you wanna call them,
will lead to collection of power. That's what
they do.
If you're somehow obsessed with the idea that
only one kind of government is the problem,
you're falling into the paradigm.
We're looking look what happened during COVID 19
no matter who was there. Trump or Biden.
We all got control. That's the point.
The point here is that by framing it
as just America versus communism or patriots versus
the uni party or whatever, all you're doing
is 2 party illusion 2.0.
I hope I'm wrong.
But once this goes through, and the another
4 years goes by, and then we write
down most important election of our lifetime, you'll
see the same exact framing.
Maybe not Trump Communism, but some other duopoly
where they act like you've gotta fall in
or you're gonna give it to the worst
person. It is every single time.
And he goes, not immediately, but firmly on
that path.
Okay. In what way?
Because come all might win? I mean, what
are you talking about? Their policies are damn
near identical right now. Despite narratives and talking
points and what what they're actually saying, if
you look at the comparison, is the same
things.
Here,
Alex says Trump
well, I'll just I'll just play it for
you. Elon Musk said this is badly needed.
So here is Trump telling you, Elon Musk
is now part of his administration.
That the suggestion of
Elon Musk,
who has given me his complete and total
endorsement, that's nice. Smart
guy.
He knows what he's doing. He knows what
he's doing.
It's very, very much appreciated.
I will create a government efficiency commission task
with conducting a complete financial and performance audit
of the entire federal government and make Which
by the way, obviously, we should want. But
guess what, guys?
It's they've talked about this forever, whether it's
the Pentagon or the federal government. And guess
what they always do? First of all, it's
probably gonna take years.
Or it shouldn't, but they'll tell you that.
And maybe even more than 4 years. The
point is, it's all about getting you thinking
it's happening. I'm gonna go ahead and predict
that what's gonna happen with this illusion is
they're gonna give you the facade of some
kind of accountability, maybe even throw you a
couple of bones to make it look like
they made something different. The bottom line is
either it will never conclude, because it'll end
like the Pentagon where they go, you know
what? There's too many moving parts and we
just don't know. Or it will conclude in
some flimsy way that makes you think something
changed when really the entire structure stays the
same in the benefit of one side or
the other.
I hope I'm wrong, but history shows you
that's how this always goes.
Do you know how large of a job
that is? You know how many moving parts
around the world and black operations and different
unaccountable
entities or intelligence assets, all of which tie
back to the federal government. There's no effing
way that they're gonna get this done.
Even if they wanted to, you understand? That's
by design. But on top of that, the
point is that I don't think they even
want this because guess what? If they did,
their own dirty laundry will be laid out.
I know you don't wanna think that about
these guys, but they're all criminals, guys. They
it's undeniably true if you're objective enough to
stand back and look at all of them.
Biden, Trump,
Obama, Bush, they're all criminals.
They're all war criminals. They're all complicit
in everything we've talked about. Trump during his
administration
committed all sorts of crimes. Assassination of the
Soleimani, the theft of oil and resources from
Syria,
con ongoing occupation like all the presidents,
bombing in the Sudan, all these different locations,
attempted coups in Venezuela. These are massive war
crimes when we just pretend they're not because
we're fighting for freedom. Right?
The bottom line is that I don't think
this is possible.
Recommendations
for drastic reforms. We need to do it.
Can't go on the way we are now.
Yeah. You know, we also need to lock
her up and end the Fed and JFK
information and 19,000
other things that we
the point is they know what we wanna
hear. Trump's good at that. He's doing it
again.
And Elon, because he's not very busy,
has agreed to head that task force. Be
interesting. If he has the time, he'll be
a good one to do it.
Right. So three times there, he made the
point that Elon's accepted and he's gonna head
the task force. But even the way he
ends though, sort of makes it sound like
it's not it's up in the air still.
I think that's by design. It's very weird.
But now there's at least and and he
says, this is badly needed. Now, another one
that came out weeks ago, he said, I
accept this. So right now based on their
back and forth and their statements, it seems
pretty clear that Elon Musk is gonna be
part of the government, which is pretty terrifying.
Regardless of the illusion he puts out about
how, you know, innovator and all that, I
think it's pretty obviously the opposite, just like
with Trump.
But here's Ivanka Trump News saying, just in,
which is not just in. I think this
is from months ago at at if not
more where he kinda floated this concept, I
think it was July. But it says, Elon
Musk is advocating for the complete removal of
all electronic voting machines. They just love to
go just in and throw 45 different red
lights on there because that really gets your
attention.
Great new the rest of the new media,
guys. It's just so stupid. Not even remotely.
The point though,
is that what he really wants?
I mean, sure, it's what we're kinda thinking
right now. Right?
Paper ballots. It's what it's what we pretend
these people are pushing for,
But they're not, though. If you look at
what they're actually putting forward, it's about digital
ID. It's about technocratic direction. It's about turning
Twitter
into your voting machine. Turning Twitter into your
one stop shop for everything. That's what he's
actually doing. So when he calls for the
removal of voting machines,
look, and look, I hope I'm wrong, and
I could be. But maybe he really is
pushing for that. Because I've heard him say
that before. I've heard him I've seen him
write that before.
But when that happens is when we should
praise it, not when he floats the idea.
That should be a classic understanding of politics.
But that they each side uses that illusion
and the childish and, you know, they fall
in love. Oh my god. Look what he
said. Oh, he's so great.
You know how often that comes to pass,
what they say? I mean, somebody should go
out and actually do, like, a mathematical breakdown.
I'd be willing to bet you it's it's
99%
doesn't happen.
They tell you what they want, and whether
they just don't do it, or there's some
kind of a narrative that explains why they
couldn't, and you oh, he knows, and he
turns out it was a Democrat that wouldn't
let him do it. Usually, there's something.
Either way, the point is, from people like
our perspective, is that, well, it was never
going to happen.
I hope it does. I hope paper ballots
is at least one of the right directions
here. But the bottom line is I think
where it goes
is some kind of digital process.
Likely something like on your phone that they'll
then you'll get the Republicans cheering for because
the Republican
administration put it forward. Even though it's this
I mean, if it came out under Biden's
administration and it was about voting, they would
scream it was wrong cause we shouldn't want
digital anything like like Catherine Austin Fitts is
recently tweeting about.
We shouldn't. That's that that is the solution.
Her point is or that is the the
not the solution. That is the
the I don't know what the word I
was gonna say. The opposite of the solution.
Right? That is the slavery. That's the thing
that might jump into my mind. Because what
she just recently said is what we once
we go past that barrier, once we step
into the digital ID infrastructure,
it's over.
I mean and that that's her opinion.
And frankly, I think that there might be
the they re I don't I don't like
to make it so black and white.
But I re I very honestly see that
once you get past that like, I made
this point with her on the show. The
1971, when you go past the oh, maybe
I forgot to bring it up. Once you
go past the
gold you get away from the gold standard.
What we saw was an explosion
in,
basically, the how much you got paid stayed
the same, but productivity continue to increase.
Whereas before that, they were perfectly in line.
So my question is, what happens when we
take this next step?
Well, we're already completely decoupled from the fact
that you're any con connection between how hard
you work and the money,
but then you bring it into a digital
point. I think we're gonna see another moment
like that where it completely falls apart.
Because there's no way to I mean, we're
done at that point, regard monetary wise. It's
all completely in our control.
So things like this,
like always with a Trump or Biden or
anybody else, we should wait for the action
to praise it. Not the hypothetical.
Because that could turn in something else. And
here's what Whitney says. The millions Musk has
donated Trump is also sure to do wonders
for Musk's planned everything app,
I e, American WeChat, a Chinese concept,
that he plans to be at least half
of the US financial system.
Does not matter? Maybe also voting as well.
I mean, that's the whole point we're trying
to make here.
Here he is saying that.
I've been working on an edit button for
a year. Well, it's a hard it's a
tricky situation.
Edit's incredibly complex.
Yeah. It's a good one. Indeed. I mean,
we don't even have, a a a map
that's as good as WeChat in China.
Like, in China, you can, like, live on
WeChat, basically. Live on that. Yeah. It's like
yeah. Everyone everyone's, like, been there. Like, you
live on WeChat. You do payments. You do
everything. It's like Yep. It's great. Basically, WeChat's
kick ass. And we don't Voting.
Everything includes voting. Basically, like, WeChat outside of
China. It's true. So I was like, my
dear would be like, how about if we
just copy WeChat?
Hey. Really?
Copy them.
Buy us Twitter copies WeChat?
Yeah. Pretty much.
I guess.
Yep.
That's where this goes.
And here he is saying and I just
find this almost ridiculous.
Not just because of the image and whatever.
I mean, there are people in the chats
below saying, dude, you're Yeah. It's right here.
It's somewhere in there. Oh, here. It's on
this one. See, this is Wall Street Silver.
I'll come back to that.
Yeah. Al McLeod says, you're 53 years old.
It's just it is kinda childish and silly.
But either way, the point is, you know,
it's you you can have fun with it.
But the point is,
Dogecoin,
as he's constantly highlighting,
is is is a meme coin that he's
been backing for a long time. Joking, you
know, putting out memes. And now the Department
of Government Efficiency.
I mean, really?
Was that planned? Was that something I just
think I don't know. It could just be
coincidence, but it's these things like this that
stand out to those of us that that
watch.
Right? That state like like, I think that
was the point, like, with the FDA. Well,
what's his name? Gruber and, you know, these
these people that were we started asking questions.
Is there a reason those names mean nothing
and dirty or, like, you know, there's there's
a sometimes there is meaning behind these things.
And so here to me, I find that
almost
comically ridiculous.
But who knows? You could think about it
what you will. On to my point is,
really, Elon Musk is gonna be the government
efficiency guy or Donald Trump? 2 people that
are I mean, do you think they have
any real understanding of what your life looks
like? Or the idea of what we should
actually be making efficient? Or whether how about
if they really wanna make it efficient but
they just don't think efficiency is what you
think it is? I don't think these people
have any real understanding
of what we actually want or even care,
quite frankly.
Or even on the main point, or even
capable of c of actually being efficient when
dealing with something that we're talking about, this
monstrosity, this is the federal government. But here's
Wall Street Silver. Epic. Burn it all down.
Yeah. X continually showing that you have no
real understanding of what these people are. Burn
it down. Or build it much larger and
call it libertarian.
Right? You think you will I mean, are
we really pretending they're anarchists? That you're gonna
burn yeah. Destroy the federal government. No. That
would be doctor Shiva. That would be the
the late McAfee.
That would be,
what's it, Adam Kokash. These people that have
run-in the past, or Shiva running currently, under
the actual premise of we'll break down the
federal government.
Not somebody who's going, give me power to
build out new things and we'll just call
that something different and better. If you think
for one second that Musk and Trump or
any of them represent anything
but more government in different ways, you're lying
to yourself.
These people are not radical.
They are absolutely part of the system. In
fact, literally part of the elitist structure, oligarch,
telecracocrat,
everything.
But here we got all these sycophants going,
yay. Change the words. It's just again, may
I I hope that I'm wrong. I swear
to god. If this changes to a point
to where they change the world, I will
happily apologize to everybody.
I just I think there's so much evidence
to the contrary it makes my teeth hurt.
But burn it all down. Right? Are you
now becoming an anarchist? Have you finally seen
the light? No. No. You're supporting an open
technocrat, oligarch, authoritarian,
and just hoping he burns it down. That's
pretty silly.
And he goes he laughs about this. Rothius
says, leftists are the system. And he says,
fight the system by making it bigger.
Yeah. What's funny is they love to put
these memes out. They literally criticize all of
them while pretending it's only about
left. That's exactly what's about to happen.
You think Trump's gonna break down the government
or businesses or corporations? No. He is a
businessman. It's gonna grow
in the ways they want it to. And
the republicans will all scream exactly the way
they frame it because that's how that works.
Just like on the left.
Now Kim Iverson wants to make a made
a point about Israel and this overlap. You
see in this new push, here's Robert Malone,
who seemingly now lashed out at anybody calling
out Trump for what he's knowingly doing. Or
that, you know, Operation Warp Speed, that old
thing we shouldn't care about anymore. Really, man?
Now I look, there's been a lot of
people hauling him out for different things over
the years after COVID 19.
And I've I've been skeptical, but the thing
this is one of the clear moments where
this is too far for me. I mean,
I've a lot of them in the past
are in a similar boat, but
to tell us that we shouldn't care about
Operation Warp Speed,
after being so called champion of pushing back
against Operation Warp Speed, I mean, come on,
guys. That is something that will be relevant
for the next 100 I mean, forever, for
all we know. This is some kind of
genetic problem that goes on through the bloodlines.
The bottom line is this was a monumental
mass genocide using a gene therapy.
He called it out for that, but now
we're supposed to ignore it because, you know,
Trump's better than her?
I just that to me sells me on
the idea that these were never real people.
Not everybody here, but specifically somebody making that
argument. But here see this is a the
whole point of this graphic, rescue the republic.
Again, afraid of pretending for a moment that
we even have the semblance of anything remote
remotely a republic, shows you how uninforming people
are. Yes, that's what it should be, that's
what it was founded as.
But we're not even a democracy anymore, guys,
if we should even want that. But let's
pretend like we're rescuing the republic. You know,
this the game is
or as as, Kim says, is everyone on
this list pro Israel? Sure looks like it.
But, yeah, let's rescue the republic.
Okay. It's silly. Right? And her point oh,
this person says, I understand your point. And
I love your show, Kim. But this is
purity testing.
See? Here we are again.
Black pill, purity testing. There is a clear
coordinated end this is being seeded through the
conversation, and anything that bumps up against their
chosen ID logs, suddenly you're black pill. Suddenly,
you're creating a purity test that nobody can
reach. Really?
That's black filled.
Pretending like there's nothing better and there's no
other choice? That's being black filled. Or the
idea that what you're saying is that asking
for something that's not compromised by Israel was
some mesh metric that nobody can reach?
That's depressing
and false.
But it says not everyone who advocates for
some good is going to be
enthusiastically pro Palestine. See, what they're trying to
do is boil down what she's saying
to only about pal that's not what she's
doing. She's making a fair point within the
context of what you're talking about.
Shouldn't we care
that these people who are all pretending to
save the Republic are influenced aggressively, financed by
Israel?
Yeah.
Or the politicians that they're supporting?
Yes.
Or how about we just put Israel aside
and make it about China? You see, that's
the point she's making. The fact that you
can't decouple the fact that you think it's
only about Israel, that's the problem. And in
doing so, blind yourself to the entirety of
the genocide.
It should matter no matter what country has
this kind of influence.
But it says most people are certainly certain
for stop certainly for stopping and defunding Israel.
That's not true. The vast majority of these
people, I don't believe, are in that camp.
And it says, I am for the the
rally and glad it's happening.
Kim says, this isn't purity testing. This is
the fact that this is the fact this
event isn't balanced
and is instead filled with a slew of
pro pal Israel or silent about Israel because
I don't wanna deal with the consequences
crowd.
100%.
This guy goes on to say, the focus
of the event is to bring awareness of
the erosion of our civil liberties. From what
I can tell, it's not designed to be
a Gaza Israel protest. Again, he still hasn't
grasped the
point. The it's not about the Gaza Israel
conflict. It's about the fact that Israel,
separate from that, is influencing the very people
that are making policy in this country.
How are we supposed to
be bring awareness to the erosion of civil
rights when the when you're ignoring the very
central part of doing that erosion?
She says Israel is one of the biggest
perpetrators of silencing our dissent, passing laws to
silence us, ruin our lives, kill jobs. It's
COVID, but it has been go it's COVID,
but has been going on for longer. You
can't be pro free speech and not be
against the Israel lobby.
Simple.
But, of course, no response because that suddenly
went too far. We can't she's crazy.
It's sad that people choose not to see
this.
Now she responds to this her own tweet
by saying, you can't be pro Save the
Republic, yet remain silent about the influence of
the Israel lobby, when we have
dozens of laws on the books that hinder
our speech against Israel specifically.
You thought COVID was bad? Just wait till
you find out what our bought off politicians
have been doing to stifle dissent against Israel.
2, all of our Middle Eastern wars that
that suck up American dollars, time, and lives,
and attention are at the behest of the
Israeli military complex. Guys, that's that's a a
undeniable reality.
She says, we are not a sovereign nation.
Not being not being a sovereign nation, making
our own choices seems quite important when you
want to save the republic.
Well put.
Sad though that they don't wanna hear it.
And Ryan says, one step at a time,
Kim.
You've been tricked into focusing on one divisive
issue. Keep your eye on the ball.
How I mean, it really is depressing to
me. I mean, honestly, the way it seems
to me like this is a person who
genuinely thinks that and is trying to convince
her otherwise.
The way it's written anyway. Could be a
bot. Who knows?
My point though is that that's it's wild
to me that what she just wrote out
doesn't ring true for you. And your point
is you're you're lost to the Israel conversation.
Her point has nothing to do with Israel
and Gaza. It has to do with anybody,
in this case Israel, influencing our politicians and
our policy. But you only wanna hear Gaza,
genocide, Hamas because you have been tricked. You
can't see anything within that conversation because of
your political bias.
Watch Kim's show. She's talking about all sorts
of things. But, yes, this is a focal
point in a lot of ways because it's
monumental.
It's imagine people during the Holocaust ignoring that
it was even going on. Or during the
Rwanda genocide. Or during the Bosnia genocide.
Just ignoring it. Going, You're over focusing on
that. Stop paying attention. We're talking about this
thing.
Well, yes, so am I. So are we.
But we're also adult enough to go, My
god, that's a genocide. And maybe we should
care about that, especially when your tax dollars
are being used to fund it. Or even
more so, that your government is literally
part of it.
I just it really does depress me.
Now, also don't forget that the CEO of
Palantir
recently
spoke out about how we need to censor
because of criticism of Israel.
So how how do we not see these
things?
And Whitney says this is proof that no
matter who wins in November, which I agree
with, both candidates will move to criminalized criticism
of the state of Israel as antisemitism,
which it's not.
It's a criticism of the of a government.
It's not the same thing. And Jews around
the world will tell you on top of
that that Zionism is not Judaism. The gov
state of Israel does not represent all Jews
in the world.
But they'll lie to you about that, and
that's all coming out right now. It's been
there for 75 years, but it's finally being
seen.
But what's interesting about this
is right now they're in this major effort
to frame Kamala Harris as somehow anti Semitic.
She's against Israel. Trump literally said if she's
in power, Israel won't exist. You know, despite
the fact that she's been screaming about how
we'll give Israel everything they need, we'll make
sure they can defend themselves. But that's, I
guess her secretly saying wink wink, we're gonna
destroy them. Right?
No. It's because Trump's lying to you because
that's what gets them
support. That's what makes sure that they get
more support from Israel, which by I can
see a lot of the Israeli conversation leaning
in more with Trump. So Kamala Harris has
been just kinda dumping her praise on trying
to get more support. None of them are
against Israel.
It says Karp, CEO of of Palantir,
Thiel's company, backs Kamala and Biden's top intel
chief, who will probably stay on for Kamala,
has major ties to Palantir.
For Trump, he's backed by several Palantir execs
and cofounders and has vowed to criminalize nonviolent
protest against Israel politics, policies, and wars. He's
openly said this. Under Trump, US government contracts
with Palantir exploded, and Biden Kamala also expanded
its influence even more. Criminalizing criticism of a
foreign nation that is currently committing genocide with
the use of Palantir's AI, which it is,
is so dangerous to the first amendment, you
think more in the free speech camp would
call it out. Especially with the fact of
CIA front Palantir being so involved on both
sides.
But alas, free speech is most in include
free speech for most, including its loudest supposed
advocates, seems to be only for the speech
they want to hear.
Now, I would argue that this shit means
that they're not a free speech crowd. Right?
That there's a lot of us out here
that are. And I that's the point she's
ultimately making. She's just trying to hopefully make
them see that.
That these people are the fake free speech,
limited speech, Elon Musk, Twitter conversation.
The act like it's all free speech, or
act like everything act like the Twitter files.
Where's everything you need? No. It's if they're
lying to themselves or are incapable of seeing
it, which is pretty alarming.
Overall,
you're supporting
everything you claim you're fighting.
And that's pretty terrifying on top of all
of it.
And then I'll grab this for you.
The strategic
support. Palantir supporting the openly supporting.
Because this is on January 2024.
Openly supporting a genocide.
Palantir agree with strategic partnership for Israel. They're
using that to murder children openly.
Now lastly,
here's Elon Musk while I was just highlighting.
Freedom of speech is under massive attack around
the world. I agree with that, except he's
part of that, and so too are the
people that they're working with. But what he's
highlighting is this unbelievably stupid statement from from
Kamala, which is dumb. I mean, it's laughably
stupid.
Elon Musk warns that free speech may not
exist if Kamala Harris, who is a strong
support or who was it?
Oh, well, the I'm sorry. This isn't the
one where he's written it out. But here,
she in this interview, she's basically saying but
2 things they're both constantly putting out. That
speech is somehow,
you know, under the control of the government
and they can allot you that spec freedom.
That's ridiculous. And even Elon Musk, I just
commented on it today, made a statement about
how that you're free speech under the constitution.
They don't understand these things or they're trying
to deceive you. You don't have rights because
of the constitution. The constitution outlines,
whether it was ever written or not, your
inherent god given rights. That's what the free
founders made clear to state.
But they're all, all of them, including Elon
Musk, giving you this impression that somehow they're
the power that will allow you to have
that free speech. That's not how that works.
Just because they say they're against it, does
not mean they have the ability to take
it away. They can choose to not,
not
what's the word I'm looking for? I always
say it. I just forget all of a
sudden.
Honor.
Clearly, they cannot honor your rights.
As a government, that means they can effectively
shut them down. Right? That's clear. Elon's doing
that on Twitter. Biden and Trump, both did
that during their administrations.
The point though is that they exist regardless
of whether they honor them. God given, inherent.
So the point when her coming out and
making these statements or walls saying how, you
know, limited it's embarrassing.
But realize, it's exactly what not freedom of
reach but freedom of speech is. So they're
really saying the same thing in different ways.
Limited speech. That's all that means. Right now,
they're censoring hate speech on on Twitter. Right
now, they're working with the ADL. Right now,
they're using Israeli overlaps to censor people saying
what they don't like about Israel. But I
also just talked about a post about a
cyclist that they censored. Or things about the
injections that they actually censored. No one's talking
about that.
Because they're censored to the agenda. Now here's
RFK again making it clear that freedom of
speech without freedom of reach is not freedom
of speech. That's August 31st. He also commented
about Twitter and Rumble were censoring content.
He just said that, which is really confusing
to me, but it's interesting. And he said,
the news asked, okay, then why are you
praising Twitter as a free speech
bastion? Because that's what Elon's doing. It's pretty
confusing, isn't it? So either you're lying
or you're deceiving.
Again, this is how Israel uses the 2
party illusion to divide, destabilize,
and control policy.
Now here's David Icke highlighting what Alex Jones
said. Don't forget this overlap with using artificial
intelligence. Whether we're talking about in Honduras, whether
we're talking about in in Israel and Gaza,
whether we're talking about in your life for
precrime or argent or, Malay for precrime investigation.
Here's Elon Ma or Jones saying, the answer
to 2084 is 1786.
Always playing on your reverence for things that
they don't I don't think they actually care
about. It says if we don't decentralize
artificial intelligence, it'll become unstoppable.
It's a limited hangout, guys. As David Icke
points out, AI is
a force of evil for evil. That's the
real reason it exists. Centralized or decentralized
is neither here nor there and a false
choice. But guess what? That's how this works.
So you got the Elons of the world
that come out and go, we'll give you
the good AI, the decentralized one if that's
even real, what it is really what it
is.
And the point is, all of these people
are pushing you in that direction, fighting for
the truth. Nope. Just like the rest of
them, they're very dishonest.
And this is something we just recently pointed
out again.
The idea that this has been stated by
people that work with them like David Knight.
That they're shockingly lacking due diligence, which I
was just gonna make a point about digital
IDs, I'll make it another show. Same with
that, the people's voice overlap. They're all just
sharing back and forth the nonsense they put
out even though they're usually sharing either things
that are years old as something new or
completely lying about what they're showing. It's constant.
This is a false choice. He says hard
sell, Schwab, Kurtz Kurzwell, or soft sell, Musk,
Teal, and Company leads to the exact same
outcome.
As always, fine. That is the same concept
as everything.
Divide and conquer, 2 2 2 party illusion,
probable reaction solution that give you
or get you
in a very clear position where you're forced
to choose. Guess what? Lesser of evils.
Well,
I know it's AI. You may be resistant,
but Tio and Musk are better than Schwab.
You see how this is always what they
push you into? They're doing it right now
with the election.
There are more choices. Or how about neither
of them are the choice? AI, for example,
is not what I think we should be
driving towards. But they give you you've got
to pick and this one's not as bad,
and then you force you to choose.
Like, I mean, see, this kind of goes
in the direction that it's will divert from
the main point that I'm making. But overall,
if you know where my mind's at regarding
voting and not being the largest superstition, we
we're gonna give you luck and rose soon.
Really, it should drive you to the point
where you maybe ask the larger question. Maybe
we shouldn't need that. Maybe we don't need
the government structure telling us what how to
live our lives. But again, as always, this
country is just not ready for that radical
proposal.
Either way, I support you choosing what you
actually believe in, whether voting or not, if
you're actually doing that. Not playing lesser of
evils, which is a controlled dichotomy.
But here is why
Dave and Ika is calling out Infowars.
I am going to share a community story
from our friend Richard Grove when he was
at the Infowars studio
behind the scenes because of his documentary that
he just felt making State of Mind. And
the commentary that he gave observing that studio
firsthand
Was that they don't check their facts? They
basically just run with it and they do
it way too fast It's the same reason
that like David knight left the organization
because he didn't go back off with the
fucking truth street kids. Yeah. Yeah. So that's
the thing. It's like it's a nonstop thing.
He's been like this for so fucking long.
It's maddening.
It's it's just ridiculous. For for a number
of reasons. But Yeah. But, you know, after
the news with what was going on was
one of the reasons
gave for leaving info wars back in the
day too.
Yep.
That's important to think about.
Now I'm gonna grab both of these for
you.
There it is. So one, I'll include my
interview with David Ike, specifically about
Zionist infiltration of Judaism, weaponized migration, and mainstream
alternative media, where he calls out all the
people we're talking about. But also the interview
with David Knight,
fighting for objectivity in a partisan world gone
mad, where he talks about all the same
things and
Alex Jones pushing Trump's sugar water, which definitely
hurt people.
Now here's David Icke also calling out Doge
Designer, who says SpaceX has played a pivotal
role in advancing space technology and exploration for
the United States. Its assets have been unlawfully
seized in Brazil, and there has been no
official response from the US government. By remaining
silent, they are endorsing censorship.
Well, again, we went over this, and it's
a whole different conversation about the asset conversation.
But either way,
censorship clearly needs to be called out. But
only focusing on one side of the story
and not asking what else is happening within
it might be important to think about. But
either way, here's what David Icke says. This
would be the US government,
NASA and the Pentagon
that funds SpaceX. Right? And without it, which
it would not exist.
The what the point he's making, guys, they
love in this community of, like, the free
the Trump and Elon kind of rebellion,
the republic they're building. They are the government.
They represent exactly what we are fighting if
you actually just open your eyes and look
at not what they're saying, but what they're
doing and what they are.
That's what I was just saying before. He
is a government contractor
in multiple ways right now.
That is Biden's administration.
So we need to step back and realize
that they are the government. That's what these
things are. And all they're doing is this
theater show in front of you to get
you dancing in the way they want you
to.
David Icke sees it.
Another one, here's David Knight. It's a 30
minute breakdown of or 20 minute. And then
she's talking about the whole he calls it
Griftergate,
Tim Pool, Dave Rubin,
Chen,
Southern Lauren Southern. All these different people that
have been exposed for being just dumped
shocking amounts of money in regard to content
that was being influenced by the background. Of
course, they're making about Russia. My coverage on
that show that that's,
it's hard it's just ultimately should be skeptical
about. Either way, it certainly could be Russia.
The point for me is independent me mainstream
alternative media
just selling out to the highest bidder.
Not objective, not nonpartisan, not actually breaking these
things down as the truth or giving you
source material. But he break David makes or,
David Knight breaks this down.
Oh, but you know, why we should care
about this, and I agree. And David Ike
says the hijacked fake alternative media is a
cesspit. And I, for 1, am sick of
its diversions,
limitation, and calculated misdirection.
And again, don't forget, he's he when he
calls this out, he's talking specifically about Tucker,
Ben Shapiro, Tim Pool,
Alex Jones, All everyone we're talking about. Now
you can decide for yourself, and I I
recommend that you do. Don't just take anyone's
word for it. That's what everyone does today.
Look into it for yourself. But at least
consider the fact that somebody's been doing this
this long, and a lot of people that
see through the larger picture can recognize these
people are at the very least bringing you
limited hangouts.
It has become an intelligent psyop, and even
many of its algorithmically
promoted big names, which I I agree with
him, largely are kind of willfully ignorant. They
don't wanna see that they're being influenced, but
they know that they are somewhere in their
mind, are so mesmerized by the fantastic money
involved that even they have no idea this
is so.
Such is the sheer breathtaking ignorance we are
dealing with as well as corruption the deeper
you go.
You'll see here and elsewhere that I am
not alone in seeing this as a long
seeing this a long time ago.
Lastly,
again, to highlight the fact that this is
exactly why we're trying to build something new.
And it's not some corporation. It's not some
mass finance thing from elitist oligarchs. It is
simply a publicly stated overlap.
That at least right now.
And the idea being that all we're trying
to do is align overlap with other independent
media people that are consistent, objective,
and and I argue nonpartisan, but I think
arguably is rarely
willing to criticize any of it.
Around three main things that we've seen kind
of highlighted the illusion of the independent media,
the COVID 19 conversation,
Israel's assault on Palestine, and the 2 party
illusion.
If you have been correct early, beginning, consistent
on these things, and calling it out the
bigger picture, not how we see it, not
the way that the 3 of us see
the picture, but simply being able to consistently
cover this in a way that's objective,
that's what we're trying to collect with here,
an overlap. Talking about panels and interviews.
Really just to try to rise up as
a, you know, kind
of as we're all being censored and suppressed
and pushed back and I'm being sued 40
different times like, that's what it's about. Trying
to be stronger,
working together in a way that is able
to circumvent the kind of control structure with
the 1,000,000,000 of dollars of backing that we're
seeing dumped into these people's hands.
Truly just about the truth is the best
we can find it.
Right? Trying to show you the way we
see things happening, holding ourselves accountable. That's a
big part of this. But the main part
about it is this is simply just a
collection of entities. We're not even, like, part
of some new it's it's you we'll get
into this more as we go forward. The
point though, and again, Catherine, part of that,
I'm gonna play the interview. I'm thinking I'm
gonna play the interview with her tomorrow
just because I want this to rest, and
that interview has a lot of kind of
timeless stuff in it that we'll get to.
And I might not be able to get
through a show tomorrow, so I'm I'm probably
just gonna do that, prom tomorrow, probably in
the morning.
But the overall point,
as her being a part of that,
is that this is something that is profoundly
important. And not just to join what we're
doing, but to do it yourself.
Right? To seek out people that are not
just thinking the same way you are, but
have the same principles that you do. And
almost importantly, have different opinions, but still maintain
those principles.
There's people in this group that have different
opinions on certain things, but we all agree
about the objectivity, about the idea of seeking
this out at all costs and not being
swayed by money or influence.
Hopefully, hopefully, more will do the same. And
I I really believe that, guys. I believe
what this is,
what we're doing, and what a lot of
people in this field are beginning to recognize
why conversations like COVID are falling apart and
we're or have already or Israel and Gaza
or any number of things. Why that's happening?
I think it's because people are starting to
see it. And a a point that Katherine
makes in the interview, in in a in
one location, they were doing a a a
poll around where people were were politically for
the coming election.
In one of these locations,
92%,
I think it was under 30, were registered
as independent.
It shows you exactly what we're talking about.
They and and large I think largely these
are people that aren't don't vote. Are registered
as independent that ultimately are rejecting the overall
point. And that's the idea is that you
have most people that don't even participate, then
you got the largest block that's independent, and
yet they still want you to believe that
these two people are the only thing that
matters.
We all see through it. Despite all these
screamers and manipulators and bought off, whether through
this kind of thing or the Israeli or
whatever else, are so desperate to maintain their
gravy train. Or just their influence or just
the fact that they think they're in private.
It doesn't matter. At the end of the
day,
it's collapsing.
As I wrote in the recent show, the
2 party illusion is circling the wagons. That's
why there's so much pushback. The black pill
purity test.
No. We're just called the truth. That should
matter.
Well, hopefully, as you can define for yourself.
Don't take our word for it. Do your
own due diligence. That's the main point. So
if you wanna continue to support this, what
T Lab is doing in
in in in particular, We do need your
support. So make sure you guys dump those
links in the chat. Let let them know
where they can donate and support down. If
you're on another platform and there's no chat,
down below the video, you'll find all the
links on the website itself, lastamericanbagabond.com.
You can buy the shirt that we're selling.
You can support us with cryptocurrency.
You can reach out or or give SendGo
or Substack or or Subscribestar.
Any of these things you can do to
support us. Because, like I said, we're gonna
keep going.
Whether or not. And it would sure as
hell be nice to be able to push
back into things that are about mounting against
us as we, you know, think about what
we're pushing back against, guys. I mean, really
take a second and think about the monumental
reality of what we're pushing against.
I mean, we're putting art my face is
right here. They know who I am. They
know what I'm saying.
I'm gonna do it anyway because I believe
this is important, that I believe it's worth
sacrificing for. But realize that this is not
a small thing. And there will be consequences
for pushing this forward. And I think that
that's important to acknowledge
if you are willing to take those risks
and chances and for, you know, for actual
freedom, for true liberty, then support us. Or
those that you think are doing that, but
support that. Don't fall into line with one
party or the other unless you truly believe
that's the answer. And I think most people
are beginning to see that they know it's
not.
So stand up. Find the courage
to stand by your principles.
Thank you for tuning in, guys. I love
you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Thank you. From
the president's office in the White House in
Washington DC, we present an address by the
president of the United States, Dwight d Eisenhower.
In holding scientific
research and discovery in respect,
as we should,
we must also be alert to the equal
and opposite danger that public policy could itself
become the captive of a scientific
technological
elite.