Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent
news as we see it from the last
24
hours. Thursday, September 5, 2024. Thank you for
joining me today. Well, it's been a few
days, and I missed you guys. Honestly, kills
me not being here when I'm all the
stuff going on around and I being right
here, I miss this. When I'm distracted by
everything else and all the things that feel
like they're trying to pull me away from
doing this job.
So good to be back here. A lot
to talk about today. We're gonna focus on
to excuse me.
Excuse me. To to come out of the
gate quickly here, a couple of things that
I wanna highlight around
something in my throat all of a sudden,
technocratic regime change.
One story that I found really, really interesting
from Honduras that you might have seen might
have slipped under the radar.
Sort of a what the least is they're
framing it as sort of a libertarian
paradise, or at least that's how it's proposed.
And now it's in this weird kind of
adversarial
state with the state of Honduras.
And guess who's behind this libertarian paradise city?
People like Peter Thiel. And a lot of
overlaps that I find really interesting,
which I begin to see, which I've been
seeing, but more so with this
kind of noticed this growing
well, we've all been highlighting the growing, like,
technocratic problem. The techno like, the the as
I think Matt, Eric, and I discussed in
the past, kind of the resurfacing of the
the the the reality of who ultimately pulls
a lot of the strings in the way
the world functions.
And today, we see this kind of technocratic
elite or elitists as I would see them
stepping back out into the light.
And now what I'm seeing is this kind
of
new dynamic around regime change. Now that's just
just the way that it get the impression
that I get from it. The story in
and of itself is crazy and important to
see how these technocratic oligarchs are seemingly pulling,
you know, may they're major moves around the
world that you could argue are just their
own personal profiteering and actions or
see the outlines
of
power structures.
That we're not supposed to identify the way
that they are. More so see this classic
idea of representative governments and people being voted
into position. In reality, it's something quite different.
And I think we're all beginning to become
uncomfortably aware of that. So I wanted to
highlight that story and how important that was
around the other conversations we're going to have,
starting with an interesting one.
Interestingly timed as well, around the conversation as
we're talking about a new kind of just
loose network of of overlapping
people that we see as being
primarily
objective.
And I I argue more non nonpartisan than
you would otherwise see. But, really, that's my
personal opinion. But being objective, being a focal
point, being around 3 main topics that we
see kind of pulling people out of the
thinning the crowd in regard to people we
see as as at least doing everything they
can to be objective and accurate in every
way possible. That again, I say it like
that only because we all make mistakes from
time to time. The point being obviously around
COVID 19, Israel, Palestine,
and the 2 party illusion. And the very
important consistency around that and this independent media
alliance we're that we've been discussing that we're
in the background putting together right now and
not something that has any funding or possibly
likely ever will or something that is being
organized by some background.
Just the 3 of us decided we wanna
work with people that we agree with, and
we wanna work with people that we see
as
objective and,
you know, to a fault, as we've talked
about. As I jokingly say about myself at
a time when I thought it was necessary,
irritatingly objective. At a time when it seems
that word doesn't mean anything to some people.
So today, we're gonna talk about Tenant Media,
an overlapping conversation around DOJ indictment, and a
lot of right wing influencers that are gonna
get getting kinda wrapped up in this conversation.
I I'm not even happy with the way
the title frames this be in my the
the title that I created. Because I just
don't feel like it does it justice. We're
gonna talk about this today. Because I don't
think you guys are I mean, many of
you might see where
I mean, be able to guess where I
might go with this. But it's not gonna
be what anybody in the paradigm might expect
because it's either at this point people framing
it as,
you know, Russia influencing the right, which is
just simply wildly too simplified, if at all,
what's going on. And then the other side,
you might see it as well, I mean,
I I don't wanna I hate I was
I'm trying to avoid these days of framing
the party side of it because as you
know, my opinion is it's more illusion than
anything. That's not to say that people don't
have those opinions. I'm trying to kinda train
myself to get away from that because even
though I can see it clearly in my
mind, I don't wanna
paint it as a kind of couch picture
where these people think that, these people think
this. Because I really don't feel that way.
But we all know those categories exist
largely with the manipulation, I would argue.
But it's important to see how interesting this
is. A conversation about what at least the
government's telling us, Russian backed, state backed, not
just a Russian company, but state backed, which
that's gonna be a point they make important
that that's just their statement about what they
think RT is. That's the company involved in
this.
Backing Republican media
to exorbit amounts of money that you it's
gonna blow your mind the amount of money
that's going throwing at these people. So that's
the other part of it for me.
Why are these people not suspicious about this?
And I think the obvious point that I
think you might expect from me is it
because these are a lot of the, what
I would see as the mainstream alternative media
crowd,
they just don't really care.
Obviously, I think some of them care some
more about the truth than others. But I
think a lot of it just shows you
that it's this massive, just mire of profiteering
and and and opportunism.
And in in a lot of times, people
do their best to get the truth out
when they're doing that. But how important it
is to recognize the difference between what I
see, what we're trying to build, what we're
doing, and people that we see doing the
same, and people that I see in that
crowd and then obviously far to the other
side of this where it's just about manipulation
control,
brainwashing.
But we'll get into all of this. But
we're also gonna talk about some Israel conversation
if we have time around the West Bank
and others that I think are very important,
but that might get pushed off depending on
time. So let's start with a couple of,
articles that just came out
that I,
Derek and I'll probably talk about this more
as it gets closer as we've already talked
about this at least twice in interviews. He's
written at least 3 articles. But I didn't
want you to miss this. The summit of
the future is only weeks away, yet the
public remains ignorant. Now what's crazy about this
is this is something that is seemingly like,
the way I framed it at the very
least is this has all the same hallmarks
of everything that the previous discussion did. The
the pa this, pandemic pandemic accord and none
of which has even remotely gone away.
But it was very clearly focused on by
a lot of us as a problem.
And I think that this is sort of
a subtle way to do the exact same
thing in a different way, or even sort
of the same way, but in more of
a subtle, abstract way that's not getting as
much attention. Either way, it's all under the
same umbrella. The WHO, the United Nations, the
same direction,
about just simply it's it's a step in
the direction of globalism.
Of global government, which, by the way, is
one of their talking points around these discussions.
The Global Governance Summit, they've already had these.
This is not a secret. It's not a
conspiracy theory. So it's important to understand what
this is really trying to accomplish. Now, even
if you wanna take them at face value
and not read in to what the control
might become, which it always literally does throughout
history,
even what they're putting forward should be concerning
with what we just went through around COVID
19, the illusions they're in, the technocratic control
structures building everywhere, and maybe they even believe
it's for your best interest. But it's absolutely
counter to liberty and freedom and everything we
pretend, and I'm talking about the partisanship out
there that we're fighting for. So make sure
you check this out. Make sure you're staying
abreast of what's happening here. We will talk
about it more. Derek's going to New York
to be covering this as well as a
few other things. You expect some live coverage
there. Again, that's what TLAB brings to the
table without anything other than just our interest
in doing so. You can support us if
you wish. We're gonna do this anyway.
That's important to think about in the context
of all the other stuff, especially the story
we'll get into to start.
Also, if we have time, I'll bring this
back up more as if we go into
it deeper today, but I wanna make sure
you saw it out of the gate. Robert
put up his article, Israel launches a war
on the Northern West Bank. Great information in
this, kind of breaking down some of the
pieces that you might not have seen around
the larger conversation. I mean, if you're even
hearing this at all, frankly, from the western
media, which is mind blowing to me. Now
Operation Defensive Shield in the past, I think
2 2002, if I remember correctly,
was about was regarding the West Bank as
well as others other locations. But the point,
I guess, just West Bank in general, but
the point being,
the way that this is happening and the
time that it is now with what else
is going on, I find this to be
an unprecedented move. Because it's it's to me,
this is the one of the final moves
that they've been trying to officially take all
this territory, which, by the way, we've all
been telling you they were gonna do. So
just pay attention because this is it's outrageous.
It's illegal in everybody's mind, even the United
States, and nobody seems to care, and everyone's
framing this as some sort of ongoing skirmish.
I mean, it's it's it's like saying a
murderer killing their their victim is somehow on
go an ongoing combat.
No. It's it's an illegal act from a
murderer killing somebody, and that's what we're talking
about here. This is an illegal occupation. It's
an illegal act in general, illegal displacement. Everything
they're doing from top to bottom is illegal,
even Gaza by the way, but just brushed
off by the very people trying to halfway
tell you they care about Gaza.
Recognize that.
And a few other overlapping points we'll get
into around Israel, as usual, that seem to
be immersed in these
That's not just because it's a coincidence or
it's an accident. It's because of Israel is
wildly immersed in all of these different manipulations
trying to convince you, paying attention out there,
specifically America, to think something very, very clear,
always in the interest of
their agenda, usually at the to the detriment
of American interests.
It's not my opinion. It's easy to look
up through history and I've got some points
we'll make as we go through. But let's
come back to this.
This is actually really interesting.
I mean, I don't I'm I've I was
these days I rarely write notes down before
the show because I find that just kinda
pulls me out of the zone. And I
I I like to be in the flow.
And sometimes that means I miss points. The
only reason I'm saying this is because there
were so many things about this that I'm
like,
just things my mind was all over the
place. The the basics, the usual right in
the beginning, which we'll get into, but then
all these other interesting things. And I hope
I get to them. My point in saying
that is there's so many directions it could
go in. And the first thing we should
start with,
why in the world would anybody at this
point, left or right, or just aware that
it's all ridiculous, that your government would tell
you the truth about anything at this point?
Now, maybe the truth, if it aligns with
their interest, of course. So it's always possible
that this could be the truth. But it's
actually crazy to me. So they come out
and say, for those that are just now
hearing the story, that there are employees from
RT,
the the
Russia today is what it used to be
called. They claim it's a state backed entity
as but the point would be, I'm sure
that's even probably true in the same context
that every platform in this country is so
obviously state backed influence at the very least,
especially plenty of them that are just literally
state controlled. And they know that but they
frame it differently. You know, like these difference
mean, even the concept of like our u
the USAID and and the National Endowment for
Democracy for Foreign Policy. They we all know
what those things are actively doing. They say
it themselves but then they just call it
humanitarian aid. Same kinda game. So let's not
pretend like we don't all know that Fox
and CNN and the rest of them are
very clearly I mean, 90% of them, if
not all of them these day these days,
have
former, in major
air quotes,
intelligence assets literally on their panels all the
time. They are government assets at this point.
Whether you wanna talk about Operation Mockingbird or
whatever else, Smith Mon Modernization Act, all these
things have led to the control of these
concepts. They maybe the talking heads and they
don't even know that. So when they're pointing
at RT and saying state backed,
it should at least cross your mind whether
that is the full picture. Or whether it's
just another and I'll be honest, plenty of
the media over the years and the point
is this is not about being pro Russia,
it's just about being pro facts. Art Russia
Today or rather RT now has been far
more accurate around a lot of the conversations
around the Ukraine war, around United States.
Of course, you could frame that as because
I share that opinion and maybe you were
both wrong. Yeah. It's certainly possible, but I'm
objective enough to say that. But it's not
about because I side with Russia or I
side with the United States. I think both
of their governments are problematic. And the bottom
line is the facts matter.
Ukraine has been caught a 100 I mean,
not to be,
facetious or rather,
hyperbolic about it, but I mean, just I
can't even count. I mean, I'm sure Israel
at this point has passed the amount of
times. But during the focus on Ukraine, it
was unreal
how flimsy and obvious those lies were. So
because the point I'm saying that is this
story overlaps with the Ukraine coverage and so
on. They make a big point about that.
But at the end of the day, it's
certainly possible that the platform, the entire thing
could be completely run by Russia. Now that's
totally different
than the conversation about what the people who
were being funded were doing.
Now the way that this ultimately went is
they were funding these media entities or specifically
Tenant Media, which is a Tennessee based platform
that I think I we I think I've
heard of them. I don't think we've ever
referenced them. I don't think we've ever I
mean, honestly, I haven't seen them be that
prominent, quite frankly. That's also one of the
points of this whole thing is they don't
seem to have that much reach in the
bigger scheme of things, and so the money
is one of the interesting parts of it.
Like, to be clear, I think it's very
obvious there's something very fishy happening here. I'm
not sold on the idea that it's entirely
Russia or Russia today even, that there might
be some other angle to this. But either
way,
it's obvious that these people were taking shockingly
high amounts of money for very low output.
Anybody,
anywhere, with a conscience would have been like,
well, maybe something's going weird is going on
here. So I very much have concern about
the way that nobody on the side of
whether it's Tim Pool or Dave Rubin or
all these people who are wrapped up in
all this.
They should've known better. At the very least,
it shows you that they didn't seem to
care, and that has to make you ask
about everything else going on. Who else is
funding them? What what's and the point is
the influence is there. And this is it
this shouldn't be a right wing, left wing
point, guys. This is about media and its
influence, whether it's US State Department, whether it's
Russia State Depart these groups are always trying
to influence content, or Israel for that matter.
So, oh, the first point I really want
you to think about is the fact that
people like us, or plenty of other media
platforms out there,
who actively do their best to remove themselves
from these political dynamics and try to objectively
cover the facts.
The objective non partisan.
We don't take funding from just anybody who
throws money at us and we are very
very transparent about how that works. Whether it's
t Lab or I'm gonna hang out or
conscious resistance or all of us together and
what we're trying to do, the reality being
that this needs to reflect on these people.
Even if they were caught up in, you
know, innocent
as they're trying to frame this and they
were just kinda played by some outlet. Okay.
That's certainly possible. I'm not gonna say that
they were wrapped up in some criminal criminal
enterprise. I don't know that. But it has
to show you that these people are
more so interested, at the very least when
it comes to high enough amounts, than taking
the money. And and as this will show,
we'd be kind of being influenced to do
certain content.
And that's can't be that's not synonymous with
journalism or objectivity. Just wanna make that clear.
And I would say the same thing about
left and I have over the years or
any other media doing so. So So let's
go through this and I want I find
this interesting other than that about what else
might be driving this. I mean, it really
could just be as simple as Russia's government
wanting to influence content in the United States.
But then the question has to become, was
it fake? Was it false?
Were they lying?
Even if they did, then would that matter?
Now, yes, it would
if it was a government thing. That's where
we get into the FARA act and overlapping
with how they completely ignore that when it
comes to Israel. And plenty of other governments,
they don't mind influencing your opinion.
Directly, explicitly.
APAC is a Israeli government content aspect or
or group.
Whether they say that or not, I've proven
this 14 times in the show. It ties
directly back to a government Israeli thing that
they created. They changed the name twice, and
on the record, said it's because they didn't
want them to be seen as the middle
man for Israel. That's APAC today.
So the point is, if this is coming
from Russia today
as a as a company, and let's just
say for sake of conversation, it's not and
we take this down since I'm just talking
right now. It's the sake of conversation that
it's not
Russian government influenced.
Is it why would that be a crime?
Isn't that just another company somewhere in the
world trying to influence creators? No. Yes. For
a ridiculous amount of money. Like, $100,000
a video.
It wouldn't be a crime though, technically, other
than the fact that the US government says
sanction
because we say they're government.
Well, okay. So these things should matter to
an objective person.
Or even if you think the government funding
that, there's a question in there about free
speech and so on. But my opinion is
still when it comes to a government, the
same way I would say about Israel or
Russia or China or anybody else, there's a
crime being committed there. That's a government influencing
policy influencing opinions. That's the the FARA Act
right there. And even if you disagree with
that, we have to acknowledge the law, and
we can discuss that. Right? This is the
same conversation I had every time. It's interesting
to think about that because now this is
being put out there, which I promise you
is going to lead to calls for censorship,
calls for registration of some kind, financial
review.
And I'm talking, like, down to independent media
level to be able to have some kind
of a license to do this. Like, that's
where this tends I see the outlines. And
let's make this clear. This is not left
or right. This is your government.
It is absolutely
both sides already have their kind of narrative
around this on why this needs to be
fleshed out because of x, y, and z.
It will only just like we're gonna get
to about the digital ID and the immigration
over here or or voting or whatever the
different they always have two angles to the
conversation. They intend to drive you in the
same direction. That's where I see this coming
from, even if it's just an an organic
story, which I find hard to believe. So
it says 2 RT employees indicted for covertly
funding and directing US company that published thousands
of videos in furtherance of Russian interests.
Now that is debatable.
When you read into this stuff, if you
look at the work of people like Laura
Chen or Dave Rubin or the rest of
them, are we really gonna pretend that they
were all just ubiquitously in interest of Russia?
I mean, I flatly disagree with that.
It's clearly some of it but then the
question becomes, is it the interest of Russia
or was it just the truth which then
happens to help Russia? Because the lie was
about Russia. Well, that's the same thing in
their mind. The same thing we talked about
with the 2016 election.
Were they lying to you? Well, no. And
in fact, they kinda grudgingly had to admit
that. But they told you the truth was
helping Russia. So you shouldn't be sharing the
truth because Russia and if you did, even
if you formulated that opinion completely on your
own, in a cave somewhere, you were still
apparently a Russian shill. A Russian stooge. A
useful idiot.
There's no way anybody honest and objective could
agree with that.
That's just the truth.
So you'll see what I mean as we
go through. September 4th. Now it says the
indict an indictment charging Russian nationals. Now look
at the look these names up. I I
did some research about the background seeing if
I could find other connections and so on.
For and I'll I'll read you directly from
a statement from Russia today who is claiming
them as their employees. So first thing I
was wondering was whether this was just something
being blamed on them, and it wasn't. But
it turns out that this these are their
employees. So right there, it's very hard to
decouple this unless the people stating on behalf
of Russia today are lying, which
there's a possibility in the larger discussion about
what might have happened to the company. But
overall, it seems pretty clear based on them
being their employees that this was something Russia
today was involved with. So the real question
that becomes was Russia making that happen?
Seems very likely almost, but, again, that's hard
to take your own government's word at that,
especially when that is in their interest.
It was,
Costin
Costantin
Koleshnikoff,
known as Costa, the 31 years old. Elena
Afancivia.
Now weirdly enough, that exact name I found
as an employee who works for the Federal
Reserve, but clearly not her, but I find
that interesting. Also known as LENA with conspiracy
to violate the foreign agents registration act. Now
it's always so impossible to take that seriously
when the amount of evidence around APAC and
plenty of other Israel government connected assets, It's
just embarrassing, and plenty of others by the
way. If it interests the US government, if
it's in their interest, even if it's against
yours, they don't care. It's one of these
running jokes about FARA that it's wildly selectively
applied. It has been, as far as far
as I could tell, forever.
Now it's a in a conspiracy to commit
money laundering.
Now it says, the justice department has charged
2 employees of RT, Russian state controlled media
outlet, which is their claim, in a $10,000,000
scheme to create and distribute content to US
audiences with hidden Russian government messaging.
As far as I can tell, I don't
see much that shows anything about hidden Russian
government messaging, more so just that the message
they were giving was not what the US
wanted you to hear, which also could mean
false. In some cases, it probably does. But
hidden messaging, I feel that's pretty deceptive. Now
it says the Russian department will not tolerate
attempts by an authoritarian
regime
to exploit our country's free exchange of ideas.
Okay. For let's pretend like we have this
free exchange of ideas, And we do have
some send send some,
some level of that. Some semblance of free
exchange, but it's clearly not as free as
they want you to think it is. It's
more so behind the scenes, you know, the
whole freedom of speech not reach game. That's
more important than they want you to realize.
Screaming into a corner where no one can
see you is not even remotely free speech.
But we yeah. We're still saying it out
loud,
but the point
is that that is what they're saying they're
attacking.
We can't allow authoritarian regimes, except Israel or
anybody else that we are okay with doing
that. Right? You see, that's ridiculous. You can't
take them seriously when you know that they're
allowing authoritarian regimes to do that to you.
In order to covertly further its own propaganda
efforts, and our investigation into this matter remains
ongoing.
It says our approach to combating foreign malign
influence is actor driven, exposing the hidden hand
of adver adversaries
pulling strings of influence from behind the curtain.
Which again is, like, verbatim what the US
government does all around the world. They all
do it. That's the thing you should remember.
They all do it. They all know that.
So when they tend to blow one of
these things out of proportion,
it's really just about making it seem as
if they've caught some big unprecedented
thing, but they all actually know. It's probably
just one of many and they all do
it. That doesn't make it any less important,
mind you, for whether you care about a
foreign government influencing, and you should.
But it says,
as alleged in today's indictment, Russian state broadcaster
RT and its employees, including the charged defendants,
co opted online commentators
by funneling them nearly $10,000,000
to pump pro Russian propaganda and disinformation, which
is what they call it. Well, I can
point to an example they list here, which
is not even remotely inaccurate.
It's just simply what they don't want. It's
like saying
any one of these discussions from Ukraine, like
like the train station or the or or
or, Bucha, or these arguments where they say
that's Russia did that, even though literally everything
that we can show proved the opposite, but
they still go with the narrative. And we're
supposed to pretend to sod gas children and
911 was because of hijackers. And you know,
all these lies we love to tell ourselves
that we all know our lies though. It's
exactly one of those.
And co opted is an interesting phrase, you
know, because we're gonna get into the point
where it seems that they're all acting like
they've been taken advantage of.
Certainly could be. But is it strange that
in any other circumstance like imagine if this
was me. Do you think for one second
the government would just assume I was a
unwitting, manipulated person? I mean, even if that's
the case, I find it really hard to
believe that they like, isn't the whole point
from the Republican conversation right now that they're
weaponizing this to go after Republicans just because?
But yet, in this case, they've got this
all sewn up, and the and they don't
do that?
They just they say I mean, we'll get
to it where they're telling they're treating Tim
Pool like he was some exploited person and
we're gonna you're we're gonna use you as
a witness. Again,
you could maybe that's the republican conversation proving
to be a hyperbolic lie, which is certainly
possible. But that should at the very least
show you this weird the point is that
the way they frame things from both sides
of the paradigm, it's always hyperbolic.
This this every democrat's a thief and criminal,
and they're all doing this to get that.
It's just it's always like that. In this
case, the point is, if that was everything
if everything they're telling you about this was
the case, this would've been immediately gone after
these peoples in particular.
For being Russian state influencers, which, you know,
or whatever they would frame it as. Which,
by the way, they've already done before.
So at a time when we've seen peak
division and peak partisan hyperbolic I mean, why
would they not go after these people? Hey.
Maybe they will tomorrow.
Doesn't seem to be the case, though. So
to me, this seems like one other example
of your government using our partisan
perspectives
to drive a larger
narrative.
As always, your government, not one side or
the other, but your government using these things
to drive you in a position. Obviously, you
know that's my opinion. Think for yourself.
Planet says the department will not tolerate foreign
efforts to illegally manipulate American public opinion by
sowing discord and division, unless it's Israel. Of
course, they didn't put that in there. Covert
attempts to sow division and trick Americans into
unwittingly consuming foreign propaganda represents a tax on
our democracy. Don't you love that statement from
Ray?
So, basically, what he just said there is
what we do everywhere in the world is
an attack on their democracy.
Oops.
But, of course, they don't frame it that
way, but let's hear covert attempts to sow
division and trick the other countries into unwittingly
consuming their propaganda. Well, that's literally what their
stated efforts are. Like, you watch that army
propaganda video. Don't they literally, in bold letter,
tell you they're doing that? So I just
want us to reflect at how silly it
is. They always act up in arms and
clutch their pearls about how they're doing what
we do well, far worse. They do, anyway.
And when they say that, again, he's saying,
they are attacking democracy. Okay. So therefore, you
guys, in every possible way, every day, are
attacking democracy all over the world. Yes. Just
make sure we're objective about that because that's
the truth. And it says, today's actions show
that as long as for and by the
way, that's not to say that means this
is less important. That's just pointing out a
fact. Now back to this, which is equally
important.
Today's action show that as long as foreign
adversaries like Russia keep engaging in hostile influence
campaigns,
they are going to keep running into the
FBI, which is just one of these moments
where they're pounding their chest like they're in
any way actually doing this on a regular
basis. I mean, it probably this is just
silly to me because their FBI is pretty
consistently
creating the very things they point at and
shout about, and they're in no way historically,
actually my opinion, this is one of the
most problematic things in our country. The FBI
is an anti American institution. Prove me wrong.
At the end of the day, for them
to stand up to me, we they're just
gonna keep running into us. You mean, like,
all the other times that we can't point
to you right now?
It's silly for them to do this and
go, we look at all you get my
point. They're just trying to use this as
a point to make themselves look like we're
always the ones stopping all this except half
the time one side or the other is
calling you anti American or calling you against
them, left or right. It goes back and
forth
as always because it's so easy to see
through the paradigm if you actually want to.
It says, we will continue to do everything
we can to expose the hidden hand of
foreign adversaries
like Russia,
but only Russia, apparently, and disrupt their efforts
to meddle in our free and open society.
Yeah. As alleged, the state Russian state broadcaster
RT orchestrated a massive scheme to influence the
American public by secretly planting and financing a
content creation company on USO. Interestingly, kinda brings
back memory of place groups like Prolog.
You know, when the US government set up
a Nazi run media company in
Ukraine and then New York and propaganda as
Americans with Nazi propaganda,
which is exactly what began the building of
the fascist state that is Ukraine and the
Azov movement they created within it.
Just a side note I thought was important.
I'll include that article for you.
Not it's right tell not just Azov. The
CIA has been building fascism in Ukraine since
at least 1948.
CIA documents make that very clear. And the
point of the car the whole discussion is
that Prolog, the company they created,
was literally
the Nazi war criminal they rescued. Michael Ollobed
was his name, they put him in charge
of it. So here, as they're pointing at
a
secret
content creation company on US soil,
I mean, ultimately, what we're talking about is
a company that was I mean, look. It
it very well could be exactly the same
thing. But I think it's interesting to see,
again, the same notes of what they have
done, what they always do. And for all
we know, it could be a little bit
of projection.
The instruments of the scheme were RT where
were RT employees, the people we referenced earlier,
who managed the operation from Moscow using fake
personas and shell companies.
And the victims of the scheme were the
American people who received Russian messaging without knowing
it, as the charges unsealed today demonstrate. You
know, despite the fact that anybody everywhere was
calling them Russian because they said these things
at the time, even though they didn't know
that, even though it may be the case.
Pretty sure everybody was at least hearing hearing
that accusation.
This office will work with our law enforcement
partners to unmask and hold accountable all those
who conduct malign influence campaigns in the United
States no matter how hard they try to
hide their tracks. Obvious point. I'm not gonna
say it every time, but the reality is
obvious around Israel.
The idea that we're talking about an entity
that is publicly
I mean, we just pointed out there there
I just saw examples of Tinder
using
state,
ads they're putting out threatening people around the
world not to resist Israel,
or or advertisements they put out in this
country,
all over the place, around exactly these conversations.
I mean, this is aggressive influencing of your
opinion by Israel, but no one cares about
that. I mean, the government, anyway.
Now it says, while we while the views
expressed in the videos are not uniform, which
I think is very important,
most are directed at the publicly stated goals
of government
the directed to the publicly stated goals of
the government of Russia and RT.
So think about how flimsy that is. So
they weren't uniform opinions,
and not even all, but most
directed you to publicly stated goals, which what
that is a very flimsy accusation. So all
that means is if you're saying Ukraine did
a bad thing over there, which we all
know they did, then you're a Russian asset.
To amplify domestic division of the United States.
Now there's an interesting claim. Because I do
think that's a part of what all this
is. And it wouldn't surprise me at all
if Russia was in fact very clearly trying
to destabilize this country. Because of the obvious
benefit that would have by,
you know, slowing down what the US is
doing to them in in Ukraine. But what's
it that that wouldn't be legal or justifiable
or whatever else. The point is that should
matter because that's hurting you, an individual, if
that was what was happening.
But the idea
to amplify domestic division in the United States
by funding people to say things that weren't
the same by I you know, I don't
know. It's an interesting claim. But I think
what's important to recognize is I think it's
quite obvious right now that the division, whether
it's your government doing, Israel, Russia, the division
amongst this population is at at peak right
now.
And I think that's very important to recognize.
I think we all feel it. And that
will be taken advantage of. Whoever started it.
It says after the March 2022, 20 March
22nd, 2024,
the the this is the, the Ukraine discussion.
Terror that they called the terrorist attack on
a music venue in Moscow.
1 of the employees for RT asked one
of the US companies, and it's all anonymized
for the the lawsuit for the most part,
it says company 1. Could be any one
of these groups we're talking about. Now I'm
gonna play a clip in a second after
we go over this.
They they they
they asked one of the company's founders to
blame Ukraine
and the United States for the attack, writing,
I think we can focus on the Ukraine
US angle.
That's a very different thing than
what what they,
asking them to blame Ukraine. Like, you see
how even on their you could just simply
say that they suggested that they like, to
ask them to blame them is different than
saying,
I think we can focus on the Ukraine
US angle. Which there is obviously a Ukraine
US angle. Now you could argue that that's
clearly in their interest, but you could also
argue that it's simply the truth.
That's not to say that Russia wouldn't force
these people to lie, if that was the
case. I completely think that's obviously true. But
we need to be honest and objective about
what we're talking about here. It says the
mainstream media spread this is what they're saying.
So think about this. In the conversation between
the RT employee and the company number 1,
let me read it entirely. It says, I
think we can focus on the Ukraine US
angle. It says the mainstream media spread fake
news that ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack,
yet ISIS never itself made that substate, which
is true. I remember talking about that. It
says all terrorists are now detained while they
were heading to the border with Ukraine, which
makes it even more suspicious
why they would go would want to go
to Ukraine to hide. Do you remember that
story?
Guys, this was a a ridiculously
manipulated story.
So based on what they're and they're including
that as the damning part. All they're asking
and pointing to are very rational points of
why they might be involved. Let's not forget,
ISIS, if I hope you're paying attention for
new people,
is a proxy element of the United States
and Israel. That's not up for debate.
The receipts are undeniable.
The only reason you may be resistant to
that point is because, 1, it undermines what
you want to believe your government may be,
and the re and as well as the
fact that it's just uncomfortable to recognize all
of the lies we've been told at 911
and everything else around that major and important
point.
Ben Swan and plenty of others have done
amazing work on this. I'll include James, as
I usually do, James Corbets. We did a
watch along on his 3 part documentary about
who created Al Qaeda.
Now, I I just I challenge you out
there. If you if you are shaking your
head thinking this is a ridiculous conspiracy theory,
how dare you?
Watch one of these.
Watch the first 20 minutes of any of
them. And you and you tell me you
don't want I mean, everything is sourced in
these conversations and it is undeniable.
The evidence is black and white.
And we I mean, from shuttling them around
to country to country, moving their families around,
Israel giving them medical treatment in the Golan
Heights. I mean, it's so public. The re
finding ISIS patches on all over the Azov
movement more than once on public
corporate
media, and then they try to fuzz it
away in the next video? I mean, it's
painfully painfully
obvious that it's that this is something that
you're being lied to about. It's a proxy
element.
So back to the point about this. Obviously,
it matters when you find out and I
mean, how about the idea that they're calling
Iran the state sponsor of terrorism, but then
right at the peak moment with Israel, ISIS
declares them an enemy and attacks them.
I mean, it doesn't even make any sense.
It's because they're using their elements because they're
desperate right now to go after an enemy
that they're dealing with.
Either way, ISIS is not what it appears
to be, so the story deserves to be
questioned. That's not to say that this is
not exactly what they're claiming. But that one
point, what they use as a focal point,
it's not a lie. It says between in
or about October 2023
and in or about August 2024, RT sent
wire transfers to the US company 1 totaling,
get this, approximately $9,700,000,
which represented nearly 90% of a US company
1 bank deposits from all sources combined. So
to me, I'm pretty sure that's the and
I don't wanna be you guy read through
this, and I'll play this video for you.
It's all anonymized
in the lawsuit or rather the the indictment.
But I believe that's Chen, and the larger
company we're talking about is Tenet. And the
point being,
$9,700,000
and that ends up being 90% of their
money. Like, I don't care what else of
the story. That is wildly suspicious. And that's
the one of the reasons that this clearly
stands out as something
manipulated.
Why would RT pay them that much money?
So that's obviously why first question is, was
this genuinely a Russian influence that? Certain seems
like one of the most logical possibilities. It's
a lot of money to be able to
to dump on these people, but
there could be an a a lot of
other different intervening points. Like, let's not forget
the the overlap of Israel and Russia for
that matter, which is an important point that
rarely gets brought up.
And the idea that we could be and
oh, let's just let's just for the sake
because I know people are very, and rightly
so, that I mean, I'm I do have
a focal point right now for how obviously
Israel's overlapping these things, so let's just put
that aside. Let's just, for sake of conversation,
consider what else could be going on. So
if we have this much money, clearly there's
something funky going on.
So is it possible that it is not
a Russian at entity or these two people
aren't even working for them and we'll get
into a point about somebody arguing that RT
itself was sort of co opted by the
CIA?
And then the people at the top of
it might have already been turned because they
were caught for something else. Like, this could
be something bigger than it appears. And then
ultimately, this was done in order to drive
the idea that Russia was influencing the right
wing influencers for something else.
Now, obviously, what you're gonna hear from the
right in this conversation is something to that
effect. That, like, this or and for but
from their mind, it's typically
all goes back to the CIA and the
Democrats.
Certainly one of the possibilities, but it's, you
know, hard to always you know, everything under
the sun points back to those two things,
to the people that don't want Trump and
Elon Musk, the rest of them to be
seen for what they actually are. Doesn't mean
it's false, though.
But it's just consider that it's not as
simple, especially with the US government telling you
that's the reality when they lie about everything,
of being just the Russian did this because
of that. Certainly could be, but that just
doesn't make sense to me. If you want
my personal opinion, there's something more to this.
That's what my gut's telling me. But you
cannot remove this amount of money
for people that oh, that's 90 per I
mean, obviously, the trail shows you something suspicious.
Now it says the 2 employees, both of
r in Russia are charged with conspiracy to
violate FARA, which I just laugh about because
of how obviously they don't care about that.
Include that, I think I got it in
there for you. There we go. Now, here
are
Oh, that's just the I forgot
for a second. I had it highlighted right
there.
Here is the indictment itself. You can read
through the whole thing.
Casey Wright made a good point about this.
I think it's interesting. Just just from a
general point of always screaming about free speech
and not going after the only the the
them claiming it's a state back thing,
which as far as I'm concerned is not
a provable concept. It wouldn't surprise me at
all. But what they continue to point to
does not prove it to me. And I've
looked through it. And when they first did
this, and they put a little label on
YouTube and everything, I I did not see
the evidence they were claiming.
Certainly, very clearly possible.
But they're bringing this is simply bragging in
this indictment about how they use this this
pressure to basically shut down RT. But it's
no different than what they do with press
TV or what Israel does with most of
their own media. These people are not in
the interest of free speech. Neither is Elon
Musk, neither is any of this stuff. And
it's painfully obvious people blind themselves what they
don't wanna see. Now it says after Russia
invaded Ukraine, which is not the I mean,
that we've been framing it like that. Yes.
I would argue invade is the correct word,
but, obviously, it's much more complex than just
Russia waking up and choosing to invade Ukraine.
But it says in February 2022, RT was
sanctioned,
which by the way, that in and of
itself seems like it makes no sense. How
what does one have to do with the
other? Even if you think it's a state
backed entity. Like, it's it's as stupid as
saying that because you took action in Ukraine,
they're gonna sanction CNN. It doesn't make any
sense. But they did this to just because
they took advantage of it. But because they
did that,
it was sanctioned. It was dropped by distributors,
ultimately forced to cease formal operations in the
United States, Canada, the UK, and European Union.
You know, yay. Free speech.
It's just silly to me. They're bragging about
using these to shut down RT, essentially, in
the United States. Canada, UK, and European Union.
Now you can read this for yourself. Let's
get into a breakdown. I won't play all
of it because it's a 30 minute video.
But what let's break down what breaking points
was saying about this.
Dave Rubin, Tim Pool took 1,000,000 from Russian
cutouts.
That's how they frame it.
Disinformation
influence campaign. So we'll get into that broader
effort as well.
Trump Today, Fox News, as as tight as
it possibly could be. We're also gonna break
down fact from fiction wing media creator.
What they are alleged to have done is
to have funneled $10,000,000
through a Tennessee based content creation company called
Tenet Media. Okay. We can put this story
up on the screen. So your major players
are these 2 Russian nationals. They're the ones
who are indicted.
This media startup called Tenet,
who has a number of very highly recognizable
and influent influential right wing media creators on
their payroll,
including Dave Rubin, Benny Johnson,
Tim Pool, Lauren Southern, and a couple others
I was less familiar with. Matt Christianson
Yes. And somebody Hanson. Yes. Now do like
I said before,
just because somebody makes a bad decision in
the interest of making money does not make
them compromised.
But at the very least shows you the
unwillingness to dive into this as they're gonna
criticize and literally everybody is. The obvious reality
is every one of them had every possible
reason to recognize there was something suspicious here.
But, you know, as Tim told you, he
just bought a Cybertruck. Who cares? Right? Obviously,
they were interested in the revenue side of
this, which, again, from somebody doing this myself
I mean, obviously, getting a $100,000
a video would clearly give us more ability
to do more of our work, but I
still would not take that chance. I still
would not unless I could verify that this
was a person with no strings attached that
wanted to in just dump this on us
because they cared about what we did and
there was no overlap whatsoever. There's no way
in the world I would end up taking
money from somebody. At the very least, I
did not know who they were. I would
I it's it's just I mean, unless something
like, obviously, here's a good point. If this
was something that was dumped in, like, a
donation,
somebody's decided to dump a $100,000
through through our substack or whatever else, there's
nothing we could do about that. That's not
what this is. This is somebody who is
directly making a contract or a deal
through another company.
And and, again, they're gonna print this for
you. So I just wanted to be clear.
All the ones we're talking about, Johnson, Poole,
Chen, Southern,
Rubin,
by the way, all of which already make
a ton of money with what they do,
decided to take money from a group that
clearly is now shown to be suspect. So
even if it was not to their knowledge
that it was Russia or if and even
that was the case,
that just shows you a a very clear
reason why what we're doing is important today.
The mainstream alternative media is not what it
appears to be. Even if these are just
profiteers. I think that's very important to recognize.
It's like the same name as somebody from
the Hanson ban on the phone, but it's
not the same guy. I don't I actually
looked that up just to make sure. The
major names of Billy Johnson, Tim Pool, and
Dave Rubin. I think many of these people
know. Yes. Okay. And again, none of these
individuals are accused of wrongdoing. Correct. However, the
details here are quite extraordinary. So Tenet Media
hires,
these influencers
for extraordinary sums of money to produce
some content for them. I'm talking like
$100,000 a video.
Under the pretext that the the Tenet Media
people run by Lauren Chen and her husband
what's his name? Liam Donovan.
Liam Donovan. Under the pretext, which they apparently
knew was a false pretext,
that there was this elusive,
wealthy businessman
who was funding all of this. And again,
we're talking like $100,000
of video plus
insane amounts of money for this. Okay? So
turns out that this elusive businessman
is totally made
up. Turns out that these 2 RT,
like, Russian agents effectively
were, influencing content. They were in the Discord.
Now that's important to me. Now, again, I'm
not gonna say that I blindly consume these
are Russian agents. I don't know if that's
the case. Based on the indictment, based on
what we have, it seems to be the
assumption is that because they are RT and
because RT is state backed, and I don't
know if that's necessarily how obvious that is.
Regardless,
what we're what we're being told
is that these people were influencing content. So
that's the most important part to me. So
now you've got people like Tim Pool, like
Dave Rubin, like the rest of them that
are getting paid a bunch of money, which
anybody would be like, that doesn't make any
sense. Nobody makes that much money for one
video.
And then they're being influenced, and that's the
point we wanna show everybody.
Now maybe it's about something they were gonna
talk about. Right? And they go, well, we
wanna make sure you focus on this point.
Okay.
Even if you that that right there crosses
a major line for me. I don't care.
I've I to be quite candid with you,
I have turned down
overlapping things like that for people that just
wanna even though I agreed with the general
direction because I will never allow somebody to
influence what I say to you.
Never. I will not in the context of
you know, the point is, you guys can
reach out to me and say, hey, I
wanna hear about this. I want you to
cover something like that. And I'll I'll consider
it, but I will always make my decision
about what we're gonna discuss. And I will
never let finance or money or anything like
that influence the direction of what we're doing.
Because to me,
that it's insulting.
It's breaking the trust that we it's breaking
the agreement that we have with each other.
So I think that's a monumentally important part
of this. And I and I see them
as 2 separate stories. Like, this may develop
into something much bigger, where it turns out
they were involved with something. But frankly, I
don't even think that's the story.
I I just want people to recognize that
the story aside from the Russian influence aspect
of it all, he just show you the
mainstream alternative media and the strings attached. And
maybe there's multiple strings to multiple big funder
people out there that and this is what
David Icke is talking about. It's not genuine
here. And I'm they may not even be
aware or, like, self aware of how contradictory
that is or contra yeah.
But it is the reality.
And we need to be aware that that
means people out there can dump some money
in these people's hands and maybe influence what
they're saying. That's never what you're gonna get
from the last American bank bond. Telling these
creators and the producers involved with these, videos
that were being, you know, produced for this
money,
like, hey, let's, focus in on this angle
of maybe it was Ukraine that was behind
the ISIS Moscow attack. Hey, why don't you
guys, why don't you guys post this Tucker
Carlson grocery shopping video?
I'll show you that in a minute, which
is hilarious because So this is what now
you have to think about the now you
guys probably saw that video.
One of these kind of casual things.
Turns out it was a weird scripted concept,
and this is what we need to recognize.
Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, all of this weird
overlap where these things are happening. We're acting
like we're just it's it's it's my opinion.
It's quite frankly no different than people, like,
you know, who was the person? You know,
I don't know. Blinkin'?
Even though we can't play the guitar, coming
out and do like, I think the game
is trying to get you to be like,
look. They're just like me.
Oh, look, he's the grocery store even though
he probably has someone paid to do that
and stock everything for. Like, at the end
of the day, I'm who knows? I'm just
saying that for fun.
The reality is that a lot of this
stuff is about trying to cultivate a very
specific impression,
a very specific feeling about who these people
are and ultimately to make you trust them.
To make, oh, you know, he's a good
guy. He's just like me. He's a Christian.
He believes in these things. Right? He's out
there fighting. He I know he wouldn't do
that. Oh, he may even if it's clear
they broke the law or they challenged what
they believe in as well, there must be
an
some kind of a reason because I just
know he wouldn't do that. We all know
people like that.
It's embarrassing. It is the it is the
reality of where our political spectrum has gotten
to. Your president is your buddy even though
you've never met him before and quite frankly,
you don't even know who he is, and
he's nothing like you think he is. But
because he's presented himself that way, oh my
god. I you know, this that it's it's
it is childish.
It is hero worship at a level that
is wildly alarming with people that seem to
be very influential.
As one of the producers was actually like,
this seem just seems like direct shilling. And
they're like, no. No. You should do it.
And they're like, okay. Fine. We'll do it.
So directly shaping
content
and getting paid through this, you know, shady
enterprise that comes through. This is what's in
the indictment. Okay? These are the allegations from
the government.
So let me read you a little bit
of that article that we just had up.
It says the indictment claims the personalities on
tenant were not aware of the backgrounds and
intentions of the 2 Russians, and that the
funding for the company came through a Canadian
shell company from a front man named, and
this is the fake guy, Edward Gregorian,
who did not exist.
So Canadian front company might eventually be important.
Interesting. You know, there's the
now just in general, just to consider the
points and where these things came through. So
I can think about, you know, whether that
might end up being important the more information
comes out. Despite the fact that Google searches
for Edward Gregorian did not return any results,
2 of the commentators and it appears that
those 2 commentators are one of them is
definitely Tim Pool. The other one's probably Benny
Johnson, potentially Dave Rubin Yes. Are the the
sort of focus of You know, Benny Johnson
is what we forgot. I mean, guys, these
are major
right wing influencers.
And, you know, just this interesting overlap. Again,
it doesn't have to be about Russia in
particular. It could just be that they're willing
to take money from anybody, but it's concerning.
A lot of what's in this indictment.
In any case, despite the fact that the
Google searches didn't return any hits for this
dude, the 2 commentators went through with the
deal, the indictment alleges, after receiving a resume.
Let's put a 2 up on the screen
that has, a little bit more detail. Eventually,
they did the deal, Bennie Johnson. We think
that could be Dave Rubin, but one of
the 2 of them would unknowingly work for
the Russians for
$400,000 a month in exchange for 4 monthly
videos.
Guys,
we work in this into that is an
insane amount of money per video, plus a
100
The Russian National posted the video in the
per video of, they say, a well known
US political commentator visiting a grocery store in
Russia. We all know that's Tucker Carlson.
The Russian National posted the video in the
Producer Discord channel.
Later that day, a producer privately messaged one
of the founders, Lauren Chen, on Discord and
said they want me to post this, referencing
the video that the Russian National had posted.
But it just feels like overt chilling.
See how funny that is? So even the
influencers were like, that's a little bit too
much.
They did it anyway.
Lauren Chen replies that her husband thinks we
should put it out there. The producer acquiesces
responding, alright. I'll put it out tomorrow. So
one of the the reasons this detail is
important is because it shows the direct impact
that these Russian nationals who were posing as
not Russian nationals and who were involved in
this producer discord
were exerting on the type of content that
was being, produced. Let's put One thought I
just had, by the way, is and again,
I I genuinely think there's very clearly something
fishy here, whether it's Russia or whatever else
is behind it all.
But we have to recognize that just from
the Russian angle of it, it let's just,
for sake of conversation, say that it was
just about trying to do content in a
in a country that aggressively tries to control
content.
And you know your sanctions, so you have
to try to circumvent those sanctions even if
those sanctions are illegitimate. So, I mean, it's
just there's an opening there for the possibility
that they were just trying to do their
jobs
and having to circumnavigate
ridiculous sanctions, which is the same thing you
could say about
food going to Palestine
or your Iranian
everything,
Syria. Like, did they do these, or Venezuela
for that matter, starve these people, but the
sanctions. Like, the point is it could be
possible
that the entire weird the way it looks
all surreptitious and rather just kind of like
poke and dagger could just be because they
have to circumvent these ridiculous sanctions. Now, again,
the money and everything else clearly adds elements
to this that make it clear that, in
my opinion, that there is something
more going on here. But just consider that.
And a larger point about how the US
will sanction something, and then them trying to
circumvent those sanctions becomes the crime even though
they were sanctioned illegitimately.
Right? I mean, this happens constantly. I was
gonna make a point up to probably the
next show about in the UK, I think,
there's a bus route they created.
And they said they created the bus route
because this you know, Jews feel unsafe and
we have to make sure that they can
have this direct bus route. And then everyone
shares this thing and goes, see? Look how
bad it is. They have to make special
bus bus routes for the well, like, okay.
Just because they did that under the the
claim that antisemitism is on the rise is
not there for proof antisemitism is on the
rise. The actions you're taking are the what
you point at to the reality is it's
not. Anybody being honest with themselves can see
how illegitimate and dishonest this whole push is,
but the point is they make the action
based on the lie and then point to
the action that's claiming that proves the lie.
It's the same thing they do everywhere. So
important to consider how that might have been
an aspect. The ISIS Ukraine piece up here
as well. It's another instance where And Bennie
Johnson.
But, saga initial reactions to this extraordinary
chain of alleged events, which, by the way,
no one is really denying it. No. None
of them are doing it. Lauren Chen has
not put out a statement, neither her husband
Liam Donovan. So, again, just a recap in
the indictment, Dave Rubin, Benny Johnson,
and, Tim Pool were not aware, according to
the US government, that they were being paid
via Russian cutouts. But the Now, isn't that
fascinating?
In what world does the US government go
out of its way to state, no. We
know. We know you're not guilty. We know
you didn't do it.
I mean, read it for yourself. I don't
see any indication that they how could you
possibly know they didn't know that?
Maybe there's something.
But to me, that is one of the
parts that rings the most untrue.
The most suspicious to me. The one the
part that starts to make me feel like
maybe this is a larger organized manipulation
to drive a certain outcome. If you think
they're not capable of doing something like this,
or even if you're not let's just even
put it like this. If you're not capable
of, let's say, standing back and going, gee.
Isn't it possible that Russia's working with our
government to execute some larger play? I don't
think that. I'm just trying to put out
something like that that's gonna challenge your mindset,
but you have to at least be like
that could be possible.
This game we play where you have this
controlled it's it's the 2 party illusion of
your pro of your critical thinking. You're not
allowed to think outside this controlled area. No.
Of course, you are. Of course, you can
vote for who you want. Of course, you
can recognize it's all an illusion. The point
is that we have to ask these larger
questions. So isn't it possible that this could
be some kind of organized effort to drive
you in a certain position? You know, that
let's just say, it's about the great reset
that all these governments are involved with? Again,
I'm not saying I think that.
But just asking yourself these larger questions. Because
to me,
I don't believe that the government would engage
with this and act like none of these
people could possibly be involved when the narrative
is supposed to be that this is a
government in particular right now that's weaponized in
particular against these people
in particular.
And I wasn't saying that to say each
point is in particular. I mean that. Like,
right now, we're supposed to be told that
Poole and all of these people, these right
wing influencers are the biggest threat to the
democrat rep you know?
Everything they're telling us would tell us that
this would be weaponized to go after them.
And that's even what they're trying to say.
Look at them, trying to set these people
up. But they're not, though. They're explicitly going
out of their way to be like, but
he didn't know. It's not his fault.
Does I mean, does that even sound like
the US government? I mean, to me, that
seems pretty suspicious. Indictment makes it very clear
that Lauren Chen and her husband were aware
that, quote, it was the Russians in private
communications. Right. Between the 2 of them, multiple
other circumstantial evidence, guys, showing that they were,
like when they couldn't get a response for
why invoices weren't being paid, they were googling
time in Moscow
as to why,
That seems so stupid.
You know, I mean, like and the idea
first of all, it's not a crime to
work with a company Moscow just because the
US government tells you they've say like, it's
all based on the idea of a state
gov state influenced out the platform.
But I I don't know. Something about that
seems pretty weird to me. Like, that is
a very important point that makes you wonder
whether they were being played. Right? Maybe like,
the idea being this was bigger than the
idea of it coming from a Russian backed
entity, and that was really the narrative that
they wanted to push. And I I think
I made that point enough, but I think
it's important to consider. All of this was
not coming in on time. I mean, at
a philosophical level, it's sad, honestly, because it's
very clear that the money was just so
good that nobody was not They didn't wanna
watch it. Asking real questions. So, for example,
let's put, a 5, please, up on this
screen. This is amazing. This is delicious
because at one point, they're like, hey. Who
is the guy? I wanna see something
about him. This
it's but this is it's a one page
graphic they apparently put out that was supposed
to be summing up who Edward Gregorio, whatever
his name is, the guy who's funding you.
And that was enough for these people,
which I think that point's already been made.
It's embarrassing. Clearly, they didn't care. This is
literally the digitally
Wayback Machine or any of those. You'd be
able to find them, and so that should
have set off major alarm bells. But, really,
what it is is that because we work
in this business sorry. Those
Entertaining.
People were raising at the time, like, at,
you know, the
Tim Pool and and whether it was Dave
Rubin or Betty Johnson, like, they want all
this money. There's no way this is gonna
be economic. And, the Russians come back to
her, like, no. We're good with it. Right.
It's like, okay. I guess they were just
like, what are we doing here? I mean
And the other funny thing about the the
fake resume
so,
whether Betty Johnson or Dan I think there
was one more point that I was gonna
play. That was basically the gist of it.
Than to them. And so even if it's
the posting of that one video isn't economic,
they're engaged in a broader ideological project that
they believe is gonna pay off for them
over What she's describing there is the idea
that these people that might be influencing them,
whether it's Russia or whatever's behind it, oftentimes
aren't necessarily
in it for the immediate return,
whether financial or otherwise. It's about the long
term payoff for influencing. And that's my larger
opinion about how these governments operate.
Right? This is a propaganda effort. Everything we're
talking about, all the mainstream alternative media, it's
about dumping
even just to saturate the field so it's
impossible to get through. All these things matter.
It's an important point to think about.
Iranian,
perhaps, influence operations with the DOJ. In fact,
I have it on good authority that there
are several
so called war YouTubers who are out there
who are directly on the payroll of the
Ukrainian government and or cutouts of the US
intelligence community. Right. So I'm gonna leave it
there. That I think that was the point
I was gonna get to, is the bottom
line is that this is insulting to pretend
like they care about this
in any context,
honestly, any context, let alone when I mean,
the point is clearly that there are other
examples of this, whether it's Israel or Ukraine
or just just themselves
literally creating cutouts that they pretend are independent
media.
It's all over the field. It's everywhere. So
if that alone should be one of the
morals of the story, that recognize that there
are people out there that are have literally
been they, like
they've spent
entities like the CIA or whatever we're talking
about, intelligence entities that have unlimited funding
and long term operations to cultivate things and
train and, you know, now today with algorithmic,
you know, machine learning with,
a artificial intelligence and learning about what you
like. Like, they can cultivate
a persona that perfectly fits what they think
you're gonna like. Not maybe you personally or
maybe actually you personally. I don't know. But
at the end of the day, we need
to be objective enough to ask whether the
person you're staring at, including myself, by the
way, anybody,
might just be not what they appear to
be. That's called questioning everything. While considering all
possibilities, hear what the people are saying, consider
what they're putting out there, and then ask
the other questions too.
Just because it aligns with what you might
be thinking is I mean, honestly, when these
days, when it's perfectly aligned with the way
you view the world, maybe they should start
being suspicious to you. At the very least,
stand back and ask these questions. Where are
they getting you know, you get the point.
I think this is an important conversation and
I'm glad this is really coming out,
but there's more.
So here here's Russia in general responding. This
is from, Al Jazeera from the 5th. Russia
warns response to the US sanctions will make
everyone shutter. I always hate these kind of
things because it's almost always kind of taken
out of context. The point is they're simply
saying that our response is gonna be, you
know, make you shutter, maybe bad, you know,
whatever their whatever the way you wanna read
that is. But it says Russia said that
it will take retaliatory measures, which by the
way, might just be sanctions for all we
know. Russia's actions against the state broadcaster,
what it says was an information campaign ahead
of the US presidential election. I thought I'm
pretty sure I had this highlighted but I'm
just gonna I think the point was simply
They're accused of funneling
$10,000,000.
It's an obvious operation information campaign that's long
prepared. I mean, I've I I did. I've
I've looks like I didn't save the, the
screenshot. But either way, the bottom line is
that this is Russia essentially pushing back and
saying that this was not a, you know,
operation. This was not you know, and that
they're censoring RT and that these but the
point is that they were employees of RT.
Right? So that's important.
So at the very least, they're acknowledging that
these are RT employees. I I think their
pro their main point is this was just
simply our media
and that you're making this about the state
backed entity. It wasn't, and so you're censoring
content or, you know, whatever. But the bottom
line is I think it's important to recognize
that they were employees and not some other
pretend thing that the US government was doing.
Now Andrew Wiseman from MSNBC
points something interesting out, his opinion.
He goes Russian disinformation campaign has ex explicit
goal of helping Trump win and Harris lose.
So you see, everybody wants to take from
this what works for their political narrative.
I mean, what sense does it make
in any way
for Russia to influence
media
in multifaceted
ways based on what they're framing it? Not
all the same opinions. In some cases, when
the to get to help Trump win.
I mean, I get the narrative they always
wanna spin is that Trump was, you know,
influenced by Russia and Putin, which by the
way was pretty obviously not the case in
the context that they were framing it as.
I think all these entities have overlapping points,
but it was Israel. That's not because of
the other points. It's because of at the
time, Mueller's investigation
identified,
unbelievably
obviously,
Israel influencing all of these people, and they
moved it aside.
That's why many of us were saying, it's
Israelgate, not Russiagate. It's right there. And so
the point of this,
making this about Trump being influenced by Russia
when they're all being openly, overtly influenced by
Israel
kinda seems like an intentional deviation from the
major point.
And now we're stepping in like, right before
the election conversation, all of a sudden this
spins back up. I mean, so this again,
take a step back, that's why I was
just saying that, and ask yourself whether possibly
all of this
was one large thing done by your government
in order to
get you in the position perfectly set up
for the next 2 party delusion
election.
Now we got Kamal saying Trump's being influenced
by Russia.
He's saying she's I mean, I'm I'm still
piecing together what they're gonna of course, she's
communism and socialism, and they're gonna take it
over. She's work but it's weird though.
Because this is exactly like the last conversation.
And I think what they ultimately want is
to get you away from seeing the real
picture.
If that's what this ultimately is. So consider
that. If you're un I think a lot
of people within the 2 party illusion are
not willing to ask whether that's possible, whether
it's not the Democrats after the Republicans, but
rather your government
manufacturing things within that paradigm to get you
in a specific position.
But it says targeting swing states and specific
voter groups, including Hispanics and Jews, in particular
media platforms.
Interesting.
The new DOJ chart charging documents raise a
curious question, he says.
DOJ charges 2 lower level employees of the
Russia front company. Right? Those people they mentioned.
But
despite proving chapter and verse about the complicity
of the 2 founders of that company
again, whether or not government,
they're arguing that the people at the top
of the which I I find that also
hard to believe. Obviously, they would know about
$9,000,000,
almost 10. Right? So it says that but
but despite that, the founders of the of
RT aren't charged.
I agree. That doesn't seem to line up.
Or the fact that they wouldn't go after
the people that in other context, they were
calling Russian disinformation agents. Weren't they just saying
that about Poole and rest of them? Yes.
But now they're gonna go, don't worry. We
know you were innocent.
We won't even come after you. In fact,
we're gonna use you as a witness. Don't
even worry about it, which is what we're
hearing right now. And again, in the lawsuit
or the indictment itself, it basically states that
they know they work. How does that even
remotely line up with the bigger narrative we're
being spun about Democrats versus Republicans? It does
not make sense.
He says, my suspicions,
the founders were charged a while ago
under seal and flipped, as in they were
caught.
And they flipped them to be basically assets
for the US government, but maintain their position
at RT secretly.
And they're he says they're in cooperating with
the US government. Now that's his opinion, and
he states that. It's not provable.
It's certainly possible, and that would actually make
a lot of sense. But my wonder is
about whether this is about Russia at all.
Now let's just take that at face value.
Like, this again is about trying to convince
the US audience of that. So if this
I mean, this is interesting. This is MSNBC
cohost
of a a podcast in Fran MSNBC.
You could have just made it clear that
look. See? We knew it. These right wingers
are being influenced by Russia. But instead, he
takes it a step further and says it
may very well be that they already went
after these people and they flipped them. So
that would make it the US government going
after right wingers. Now that perfectly works
for the Republicans who wanna make it about
the only Democrat side of the government going
after right wingers. But then why wouldn't they
just do that in the first place?
Like, the idea that they would need to
go out like, the point is all you
would needed to needed to do was make
this about them being influenced by Russia.
But I guess it seems wildly abstract. Again,
it could be what they're framing it as,
but I think to me, it represents a
bigger picture of your government trying to manipulate
us right before the election in interest of
getting you in a position to focus only
on the internal dynamic of the division that's
rooted in a lie. Right back to the
lie of Russiagate itself. Like, we're literally rehashing
a Russiagate narrative again.
I find that to be interesting.
But it's certainly possible that this is a
CIA type of action through a
cutout
to go after people in this country. And
just because that aligns with what the republican
narrative is, doesn't have to mean it's false.
I just wouldn't see it as the democrats
going after republicans. I would see it as
your government
going after entities.
But the question would be why they would
go after people that I think are a
useful tool for what they're doing.
So if that's the question,
the answer might be that they're using this
to make these people look like they're the
suppressed heroes.
Right? I mean, is that what the ideas
around Trump and a lot of this stuff?
Like, I genuinely think that in a lot
of these cases, that they're setting this up
to make it look like they're the heroes
being suppressed by their government when they're already
going, don't worry about it. You're not gonna
be able to
but it's still being framed that way.
But again, there's more tomorrow, next day, maybe
it could change. But as it stands now,
honestly, that's what makes the most sense to
me.
Robert Barnes chimes in and says, wonder why
the DOJ didn't indict the company? That's what
they were just asking as opposed to the
individuals.
Because Mueller's scam Russiagate indictment
got exposed as b s. Of course, he's
not talking about the Israel gate part of
it, because the company appeared in the case,
demanded discovery,
and DOJ had to drop the entire indictment.
Odds, the funding source is closer to Langley
than Moscow?
That's certainly possible. Right? But, again, obvious point
comes to mind for me. If all of
these efforts was to hide the source, isn't
it possible that the source is the entity
that seems to be the source in every
other conversation?
As Polly points out, nah. Tel Aviv.
Consider both.
Don't dismiss 1 or the other based on
your current standing. Consider both.
Or, you know, independently, but also consider both
as one idea,
That Tel Aviv and the CIA were doing
this to go after you, Americans.
Either way, I think it's important to see
that everyone seems to be understanding this, at
least, you know, the feeling that this is
not as simple as bad guy Russia trying
to influence American opinion.
Which again, as I've said a 100 times,
it's very likely.
But to me, I think you see where
this is going.
September 4th, this is wired. Right wing influencer
network, Tenet Media, allegedly spread Russian disinformation.
Now the Tennessee based company,
and again, it highlights people like that's Tenet
Media. People like Benny Johnson, Tim Pool.
I think where this is mostly redundant.
Johnson, Pool, Rubin, Southern did not comment.
9 are accused of wrongdoing. Really important to
reiterate that. We are disturbed by the allegations
in today's indictment, Johnson wrote on x, referring
to himself and his lawyers, which make clear
that myself and other influencers were victims
in this alleged scheme.
Hardly victims, guys.
Everyone is seeing, if you look through this
for yourself, this was at the very least
willful ignorance.
So for them to come out and all
of them kind of taking the same line
that we were taking advantage of, well, you
were hardly taken advantage of when you made
a hell of a lot of money to
do content that they sort of guided you
on. That does not seem like being taken
advantage of.
Sure works for you now. Poole also released
a statement saying in that that we should
these government allegations prove true,
really, I, as well as the other personalities
and commentators, were deceived in our victims.
Victims?
And then Rubin retweeted that.
I just I that seems a far stretch
for me.
Now AG points out, just so to clarify
because I think it's important to note, the
indictment alleges the founders of the company, Laura
Chen Lauren Chen, and her husband intentionally deceived
the influencers mentioned below.
So very clear. Not even just says that
they weren't guilty, but the idea that these
they go out of their way to make
the point to say that they were deceived.
But in what way
is this falsely portraying to the commentator that
he was sponsored by private investors, Edward Ed
Edward Gregorian. But, again, we just went over
this.
It it was
insultingly
flimsy.
So this was willful ignorance. You poke at
it and it almost falls over and you
go, never mind. Not gonna look anymore. I'll
take it at face value. That's Edward.
Does that sound like a victim to you?
That they to the so far to the
US government's indictment that would go out of
their way to say no, that they were
deceived?
I don't know, man. That does not seem
like what the US government is not in
the habit of just giving you the benefit
of the doubt unless it's in their interest.
Think about that.
Bradley says the indictment notes the influencers agreed
to the deal even after they got the
weird web CV of the founder funder. Due
diligence was clearly not their priority.
Everybody can see that.
And then Tim Pool says, I have been
contacted by the FBI as a potential victim
of a crime.
Really?
Alright. Just this seems very off to me.
The FBI believes I have information relevant to
an ongoing criminal investigation. Now to be clear,
he could have framed it as this and
that's maybe they're going after him as suspect.
So, you know, objective. We'll wait and see
how this plays out. But to me, this
build right now is a very, very suspicious,
you know, victim dynamic that no other context
would they be framed as victims. And I
mean, ever again, going back to the narrative
of the right versus left, that doesn't make
any sense. Are we being told the FBI's
weapon? I mean, none of these narratives make
sense when you really look at it because
the point is it's a government, not two
sides of it.
It says, I will be offering my assistance
on the matter.
Of course, all the same, you know, it
doesn't matter.
So Ben Shapiro chimes in and says, this
is correct, and this is the point about
them being victims.
Of course, Ben Shapiro steps in with all
the other Zionist anti anti Palestinian bro and
says, this is correct. Dave and Tim Kast
and Ben and Johnson aren't the issue here.
They were apparently deceived by the company founders
who allegedly taken oh, because you know, Ben?
You know? Because you read the indictment like
the rest of us that in no way
shows they were deceived that they chose to
ignore the obvious holes?
Is it their circle in the wagons? Right?
Because it's odd let's we'll have to make
sure we ask questions about other overlapping points.
But Secular Talks says and by the way,
I don't support either of these people for
the most part. He goes, this is effing
BS, Ben. I work in the industry. Independent
media isn't independent. But again, he makes an
excellent point.
Independent media isn't independent if they say yes
like a little lap dog to every Tom,
Dick, and Harry advertiser
wanting to throw money at them. I've never
had a conversation with an advertiser and you
jam an effing ad read into every 7
minute video like a corrupt sell out you
are, which I completely agree with. If somebody
is giving 100 of 1,000 of dollars a
month or week, there are strings attached. You
know this and you're lying.
Now, the only I I just find Kyle
to be very partisan as well. But either
way, his opinion here
is exact I completely agree with that.
Everybody would. I mean, objectively, it obviously seems
suspicious and they just chose not to look.
You don't get to act like a victim
with that. And why the government wouldn't
frame the narrative for you like that should
be the most suspicious thing about all of
this. Now Sebastian Gorka,
who was apparently contacted for this but didn't
take it on, says always follow the money.
He says in February 2023, Lauren Chen approached
him to be the face of Tenet Media.
So clearly aimed at Republican influence, obviously. It
says the money looked great, but I wanted
to know where it was coming from. Simple
question, you would think. Right? So whatever your
thoughts about him, he clearly was like, I'm
not gonna just blindly take money. So that's
a good
not you know, that's a good aspect,
trait for him. The rest of them, make
a note of that.
After pushing repeatedly, she gave me names of
people who had no Internet footprint, like Edward
Gregorian. See? So whatever your thoughts, he clearly
cared about being influenced by somebody he didn't
know, which anybody honest would.
Or who had zero media connections. I mean,
none. He said it just didn't add up.
Warning. If you have a brand and somebody
wants to leverage it, find out who they
are. It's that simple.
FYI, since according to yesterday's DOJ indictment,
Edward Gregorian
doesn't even exist and was invented by RT
and the Kremlin. Now that's the way he's
saying that based on the narrative coming from
our government.
I don't know. I I don't think even
remotely can prove that. I think it's about
the idea that it's rush it's r RT
that they claim is state backed, and the
rest is filled in the blanks. But it
says those caught up in Shen's web should
have known better, seriously, unless due diligence wasn't
important to them. There is your ringing point
right there.
It's not. Same thing we hear about all
of these people. Whether it's info wars, the
rest, why people left, Why Dave Knight and
the rest because they don't have they they
will go with whatever works.
I know that's not fun to hear people
that you wanna look up to, but the
reality is there. The track record is there.
You know, I think it was,
who was it here? I think I've got
this right here.
Let's see.
Yep.
Teece pointed this out. I am going to
share a community story from our friend Richard
Grove when he was at the Infowars studio
behind the scenes because of his documentary that
he just felt making state of mind. And
the commentary that he gave observing that studio
firsthand
was that they don't check their facts. They
basically just run with it, and they do
it way too fast. It's the same reason
that, like, David Knight left the organization because
he's like, yo. Yeah. And the fucking truth
stream kids.
Yep. Yep. So that's the thing. It's like,
it's a nonstop thing. He's been like this
for so fucking long. It's maddening.
It's it's just ridiculous. For for a number
of reasons, but Yeah. But, you know, after
the with
what was going on was one of the
reasons
gave for leaving info wars back in the
day too.
Right? I mean, that should matter, guys. Now,
again, don't blindly take our word for it.
Look.
And if you disagree, then then good. Then
you came to your own conclusions. But at
the end of the day, the evidence is
pretty clear over the years. And, you know,
just because you lob out a bunch of
a bunch of hypothetical can go like, you
know, I mean, there's one that I just
saw floating around about what was, you know,
something that was gonna happen. There's a school
shooting, you know, we predicted on the 9th.
It'll happen on 5th, but it's close enough.
Well, it's not close enough. That's wrong. It's
not the case. You that you can float
a lot of hypotheticals. There's gonna be an
event. There's gonna be a false something will
fill the gap.
What I'm more interested in is how many
times over the years any number of these
people have been flagrantly wrong in very dangerous
ways. You know, like, it's just sugar water.
Don't worry.
Doesn't that matter more to you than guessing
abstractly at something that kinda fills in the
blank later?
I think our the track record of people
needs to be consistent. Like, the point that
I point out about TLaven is not just
me. It's the entire group that we have
at this platform.
Our track record doesn't need to be screened
about. It's obvious. You go back and look
at the at the major discussions that we've
had, whether we're putting piecing together what we
think will happen that literally turns out to
be the case just because we were watching
the story, or that we pre we show
you something based on what we've done our
research on that is the case and is
later proven right. The our track record is
obviously there.
And, yes, I'm patting myself on the back,
but more so demonstrating our value to you
to understand why it's important to look wait.
Maybe if you don't like us, find somebody
else that is in the similar path,
willing to be on that path and not
a partisan path no matter what. But it
says, PS, I don't trust the Harris Biden
DOJ as far as I can spit them
after what they did to innocent January 6th
nurse, which I agree. But, again, I I
see it as a repug a government thing.
Because, I mean, obviously, I'll I'll point some
articles out in a second. I think the
January 6th thing was not a it was
about your government weaponizing at
a whole lot of things overlapping with Israel
and Ukraine,
but it wasn't about democrats fighting republicans. Just
wasn't. It's about your government using those things
to get you in a very clear position.
When he says
and what they're yeah. Just based on what
they're doing with Trump and everybody else. He
says, time will tell what Chen knew and
what she and and when she knew it.
Interesting.
This person responds by saying, does that suggest
that Laura Chen, who seems to be deeply
embedded into conservative right wing politosphere, could be
totally compromised?
The point they're just making there is, like,
we just need to consider. Right? That there's
it's not a left right thing,
but in the current dynamic, it's obvious to
me, in my opinion anyway, that they're right
is the direction that they're giving you for
the next selection. And so I think it's
important to see how this is all being
laid out.
Now from the
the partisan side of this, after we just
went over, here's what Kanoa the great says.
The DOJ charged 2 Russians with funding Laura
Chen's Tenant Media claiming they gave $10,000,000 to
influence US politics.
China spent the last few months criticizing Trump
for going weak on crime, immigration, abortion.
She's called Vance a total blunder, contributing to
a total lack of enthusiasm.
If one trusts the DOJ, which I don't
know why you would, despite its history of
political bias, the Biden family of course, in
his mind that means toward the for the
left against the right, which is simply not
the truth.
The Biden family received over $25,000,000
from Russia, The spy chief of China and
Ukraine without registering under FARA. A 100% agree.
But by the way, you could make the
same points about all sorts of things. What
about shell Mary Adelson giving Trump a $100,000,000
for his campaign? I mean, guys, there's a
lot of obvious overlaps that we don't want
to look at.
Or Ukraine for that matter in a 1,000
different ways that overlap with Trump or overlap
with other people in our government that are
left and right.
But the point is not to say this
first that. The point is that there are
all sorts of examples. Biden and his family
are shockingly corrupt.
Hunter and the rabbit, it's obvious. And that's
the point to make here, is that this
is being selectively applied. Now you could read
that, and maybe you're right, to be about
blindness to one party versus the other. But
if you look back through history, it's just
not the case.
We're watching a partisan game played by a
government that loves for you to think that
there's 2 parts as opposed to a government.
Again, my opinion.
But I think what we're if through that
opinion, what it shows me is an interest
in trying to get you to ball to
fall into this. And to think that because
they're doing this, it's about trying to do
this to Republicans, therefore, the Republicans are the
good guys. That seems to be the simple
backbone to just everything happening right now.
And it's childishly simple.
They said this, so the opposite must be
true. I can't believe we're still falling for
that.
But it says it would seem like Russia
is backing Kamala Harris.
Okay? So now, the left is saying
Trump and his Republicans are being funded and
influenced by Russia. Now the right is trying
to throw it back at them, which is
pretty much what always happens.
Actually, it's Russia funding Kamala. See?
Or how about they're probably all throwing mud
at each other and it's not even rule
you know, you get the same old point.
But you they show all these clips about
her saying things against Trump and so on.
I wouldn't even argue that I think Shan
or the rest of them are necessarily
like, I I I think that it's ultimately
about painting a picture that works for the
overall agenda, not necessarily that these people were
all knowingly involved in one thing or another.
But that's just my opinion.
Paul Street says,
when they say they were Russians
funding the anti Donald Trump content, I guarantee
you, somewhere, you'll follow the money and find
it's really the CIA working with the Democrats.
Maybe so.
But my point is that that's what is
is the narrative to them whether or not
the facts ever back that up as you
well know. Just like the left does, the
same damn thing. Wyatt Reed adds another point
to this.
But here is an interesting overlap. So you
got the Israeli propaganda,
you know, like, I don't even know what
you would call it. Machine is probably too
complimentary at this point.
The I don't even know what's worse than
that, but, you know, this clunky thing that's
falling apart everywhere. Their their propaganda machine is
embarrassingly bad right now, but the point is
that this is part of that propaganda
Hasbarra.
You know, this is one of the people
who are constantly screaming about things around that
conversation.
He says, 1 1 by 1, each of
these Russian propagandists will fall. God bless the
FBI and the justice department. And look, he
he points out all you know, the ones
you just saw and Tucker and the rest
of it, but he also goes Jimmy Dorr,
j Jason Henkel, Brand, Ray McGovern,
Max Blumenthal.
Okay. So clearly, this is about people that
are highlighting Israel. Because Cause a lot of
that is all intermixed. If you're focusing on
focusing on the Russia
conversation, that this is that's a mixed bag.
What's funny to me,
is right now, from Israel's perspective, it's in
the inter I I think what this ends
up showing me, is that there's
a the likelihood that this is about Israel
trying to destabilize this country using all of
its possible tools.
I mean, it
seems to line up,
and obviously would be in the interest of
Israel, but question it for yourself. I just
think it's very obvious to me on a
world stage scale,
what entity right now is in the most
desperate position? And is in the most interest
of making sure that the most like, I
I keep telling you, everything they're doing is
aimed at the western audience, particularly the American
audience.
How does that make sense?
It only adds up when you recognize that
the most important thing for Israel is to
make sure that the western audience believes the
narrative.
Because the United States government,
who is pushing that, are a central asset
for why the Israel still exists.
Their own population doesn't agree with what they're
telling us. So the bottom line is that
this whole thing is aimed at you. So
when we see stuff like this, we need
to ask, is this all about destabilizing
our internal dynamic, and all they get to
do is point at Russia, which is what
they always do?
Wyatt Reed says, very sorry at this point,
Australia's best fed fascist, but reporting facts I
don't wanna hear is not currently a criminal
offense to the United States. That's his opinion,
obviously, but I agree for the larger part.
What they're talking about is a lot of
information that you can easily prove is true.
This falls against the narrative, whether it's,
you know, anti Ukrainian or anti Russia or
Israel, whatever it is.
Yasir Ali points out, Blaze Media has now
fired Lauren Chen. So, you know, you got
the republican platforms getting rid of her, which
makes sense, obviously, because she's sort of toxic
at this point based on the way that
all went down. But it just kinda shows
you that they're the from the republican side
of this, boxing away the person that was
part of that problem.
Which if this was about the manipulation,
I don't see why well, I guess the
idea is that she in particular were there
claiming she was aware of it all. But
again, I think all of them were aware
of it. So it's selective, I guess. But
it says yesterday after the indictment, they alleged
that her and her husband were behind this.
The indictment also alleged they participated in the
conspiracy to cover up the original source of
the funds. Now they have fired her. Now
anonymous
highlights this
interesting point from The Guardian, which is just
hilarious and just fun to look at Tim
Pool without his beanie on. But the point
here is that they actually
I mean, it just makes you think about
how bad this is and maybe intent I
don't know. Maybe it's intentional.
The Guardian
used this guy's picture
and claimed it was Tim Pool.
Are they really this bad at their job?
The Guardian with un
with
resources. You're literally gonna pull up a picture.
I just think that's embarrassing as hell and
it shows you how silly this all is.
Maybe it's intentional though.
But this is the Guardian putting up a
fake picture or picture of some other guy.
I guess it's Greg Hausch.
And he and this goes this he anonymous
tags them and says, hey, Greg Hausch looks
nothing like and he calls it the Russian
asset, Tim Pool. Because it what's weird, anonymous
seems to have got this crazy left swing
recently or for a while, like, maybe always.
I don't know. It's very strange. Greg is
a nice guy. We respect Greg. Change the
picture. Picture below is Tim Pool. That is
Beanie. Please use that. It's just funny.
It's so embarrassing. I don't know why you
can do that. But anyway,
pretty weird.
They just used the wrong picture, and it's
just fun to point out The Guardian's ridiculous.
Now, on top of that,
this is from the 5th.
Former 2016 Trump campaign adviser is charged over
overworking for sanctioned Russian TV.
So to me, this just feels like a
very, very clear effort to make this all
about the right and Russian influence, which, again,
just like before, seems very flimsy. Based on
the idea that there we know RT's state
back, therefore that means this. And it's all
these it doesn't seem
in even even from a court of law
perspective, like this would even hold up. Which
is just like last time. Right?
So I think this feels very clumsy, which
makes me wonder whether it's even about
going after the Republicans, more so about making
you think that. That's why they're like, don't
worry guys, we know you're not guilty.
The US government has charged Russian born US
citizen and former advisor to Trump's 2016 campaign
with working for a sanctioned Russian state
platform.
Right? So the point is it's only a
criminal act because they claim that entity is
no longer allowed to be worked with. But,
I mean, it's it just seems like, you
know, look, I go on a radio show
all the time with Sputnik and whatever else.
I'll tell you right now, if RT reached
out and wanted me to go on a
radio show to talk about it, pretty much
anybody else as well, I would. So I
gave my opinions and I don't hold back.
And it's not influenced by anybody. But did
that make me a criminal?
Maybe in the eyes of the US government,
well, that's the whole concept we're talking about.
Now don't forget, things like this, about the,
you know, the left and the right game.
So Bob Mendez, if you don't remember, was
just recently charged as acting as a foreign
agent for Egypt.
Taking money illegally from a foreign government. But
they didn't get a lot of attention because
it wasn't one of the ones that they
love to politicize.
It's funny how that works out. Right? But
the point is simply to show you, and
for all we know this was a simply
a a
extension from some other government using Egypt. I'm
sure you can imagine.
But all it is to point out that
this is not new. And frankly, I think
every single one of them are profiteering to
the max because they're all criminals and they
all know that. It's all it's saying, an
allowable level of criminality.
So my point when this comes to this
kind of conversation about other government entities and
the influence they're in, I think that's just
like saying it's Tuesday.
And how it's being used. And the same
point I was just making.
On that note by the way, there's other
indictments and things flying around about Trump. And
everything loves to be politicized out of the
lens of political pro persecution, which frankly, I
think that's almost always part of it. But
that that doesn't mean the claims are also
false. So I just wanna highlight as that's
happened to him, interestingly overlap to this is
from today. FBI raids the home of 2
top deputies for New York City mayor Adams,
according to other sources.
So that's a left leaning concept. You know,
just point this, it doesn't have to mean
one or the other. The point is just
to really show you that there's a lot
of overlapping things happening. And we just, as
the partisanship, tend to frame it whatever works
for the partisan game. And if you come
in with any kind of objective perspective and
they call you some kind of a show
from the other side, it's very simple. We
all see it. It's it's frustrating.
But here's another angle to this. Now this
is a WikiLeaks document, vault 7. Remember this?
CIA hacking tools revealed. And to be clear,
like I just said, I what I've outlined
is what I genuinely think is the reality.
But always consider this. Now this maybe it's
not even related to what's happening. But just
remember
how it was revealed that your government has
the ability
to hack as well as all sorts of
other things and leave the footprint of whoever
they ultimately want. Well, I mean, it's not
most are the people they've already stolen things
from, but Russia being one of them. Here's
the here's from WikiLeaks fault 7. It says
the CIA remote device branches umbridge group collects
and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques
stolen from malware produced in other states, including
Russia.
With umbrage and related projects, the CIA can
not only increase its total number of attack
types, but also misdirect attribution
by leaving behind the fingerprints
of the groups that the attack techniques were
stolen from. So just consider that as we
go forward in this new technocratic age. And
the reality being that ultimately if they wanted
to, they could do all sorts of stuff
like this, more so hacking. And just
say it was Russia.
Anybody would go along with that,
including the partisanship.
Now I'll include this as well on the
idea that the whole January 6th overlap.
Remember what this ultimately was.
An effort, in my opinion, to frame the
Republicans
as being part of some kind of white
supremacist, vanilla ISIS rising entity, but also overlapping
that with the Azov movement, Israel, and the
funding in Ukraine. And I it wasn't about,
in my opinion, a partisan divide, it was
about using that for the interest of their
agenda.
But at this and and again, I see
it happening right now. Using the Republicans to
convince other conservatives that we need to have
digital ID under the guise of the SAVE
Act for voting and all these other things.
By the way, on that note, again, tomorrow
I'll be interviewing Katherine right here in the
studio. Catherine Austin fits. I don't believe it'll
be live, but I'm gonna try to get
it out tomorrow either way. But the point
is we're gonna talk about that exact conversation.
We're look the whole thing. Everything we've been
talking about, alliance included.
But so January 6th, the failed false flag
meant to blame Russia and you using the
CIA grown Azov battalion. So the US government,
Israel,
Azov movement in Ukraine because remember, that's the
point here as you can see, this Ukrainian
Azov movement member, all proven,
Sergei Binion,
as this is the other article, January 6th,
was always a very clear government operation,
is on the record
on video, screaming, let's go, in Russian. He
speaks Ukrainian. He's Ukrainian.
And as a member of the Oslo movement,
next to Chancely, along with,
Antifa members screaming, we did it. We tricked
him. The point was this was an organized
intelligence and appar operation meant to, in my
opinion, completely frame them
as the entity being used through this kind
of mechanism of white supremacy and Nazis and
all of this, which kinda blew up in
their face because now it's clear it's Azov
movement and even Israel at this point overlapping
with fascist entities.
But it's interesting and obvious how they were
trying to accomplish this. And I see the
same hallmarks with all the things we're talking
about. And now, you see, Russia seems to
be coming right back up again.
Which doesn't mean you should ignore possible Russian
influence. But the obvious point is that
it's far too clumsy.
You know, this is this is something that,
again, interestingly overlaps, which might even add to
the point of whether Russia could be part
of something. But
this this is a
random account.
It's a cue since 2017 that says, oh,
no. Libros, what to do? It says a
vote for Kamal is a vote for Putin.
Putin says Ukraine's incursion failed.
Excuse me. Backs Harris in the United States
election,
citing her infectious laugh.
Alright. So
I said, Putin regularly trolls the 2 party
illusion and Americans' naive obsession with it, recognizing
how easy it is to manipulate American opinion
with a well placed statement.
Now recognize that your chosen ideologue
does the exact same thing to you.
And
Casey White has another example where he says
in an interview, Joe Biden says for all
of his allies to support Harris. So I
so I guess that's what we'll do.
He's making a joke.
But of course, it doesn't matter because the
idea is they're gonna frame it as, see,
he's working with Harris. Which is already part
of the narrative from the right. And the
other side's gonna say this point.
Right? And say, like, and the idea is
clearly or that's not the other side of
it. But the point is that the idea
he's using here is to play on the
way these narratives are used, this flimsy game
that's played.
But it also seems like he's adding to
it.
So consider for yourself. But let's make it
clear, if you're gonna believe that because he
jokingly said this that therefore, Hill Herrera is
the one, or vice versa, that means Trump,
you're just playing into lie. You're playing into
the easily
digest the easily broken down manipulation.
Now on the note of interfering,
the White House says Putin should stop interfering
after backing Harris. Oh, look at that.
Oh, look at that. Apparently, he's backing Harris
now. Guys, that's not a joke.
This is actually Radio Free Europe or specifically
Reuters, and it's the United States government saying
this. And if you watch the clip, he's
laughing. He's a he's joking. And are you
really gonna say that that I mean, look.
Just so it's clear again. Which I don't
think I need to reiterate. But he literally
says,
Joe Biden says that we all of his
allies have to, so I guess we have
to. Like, do you really think that are
we that simple?
But your own government is now pointing to
these kind of conversations and saying, he's backing
Harris.
And people were going with that.
Does that not show you how simple this
all is that it's not even really about
they all know we kind of know that's
not what he meant, but it doesn't matter
Because it's about the division.
And on top of that, stop interfering?
So that's so that's that's your that's what
you're gonna go with? So we're right back
in the Russiagate nonsense where they know we
see through it, they know it's not real,
but it works for their purpose.
The government, not the left or the right.
But as Carlos points out, breaking. The US
government takes a short break from interfering in
the Venezuelan election to accuse Russia of interfering
in the US election.
Perfect.
Or how about every other election everywhere? We're
gonna talk about all the constant different dynamics
we're seeing where they're doing everything they can
to get the people they want in power
and, like, everything everywhere across the world. Yeah.
It's not even that much of a hyperbolic
statement.
But Russia makes Putin makes a joke about
Harrison. Oh, my god. We're gonna stop. It
is kind of embarrassing. Like, I'm embarrassed by
these people.
Empire of lies says, can someone tell these
idiots that APAC just spent a $100,000,000
interfering in the US election? Right? Exactly.
I don't know. It doesn't matter though because,
you know, Israel's our ally.
This person says the foreign agents registration act
has been weaponized to arrest 3 Russian and
Chinese citizens just 1 week alone. This is
the one from that RT discussion. Some of
the and that's the other one. This is
someone from China. So meanwhile, Israel gets to
run our government and with money and supply
and supreme immunity. Now you could argue that
all those entities could be part of the
same thing. But you can't miss how clearly
that they're ignoring one and going after the
other. Now on a larger point,
I genuinely believe
Israel has these I mean, almost the stated
interest of trying to destabilize this country, whether
it's for their prophetic
the the prophetic kind of direction of destabilizing
these entities to bring on the end times
with the rabbis are currently talking about all
over the country.
Or just to destabilize this country because they
need you as Americans to stop seeing what
they really are?
In any case, a great clip from James
Lee around the
US' liberty conversation.
It's only a couple minutes.
As he said, he expected to find the
evidence because we all actually know the reality
of this because there are people like this
guy here who are still alive, who will
tell you they know Israel tried to kill
them, that their government covered it up very
clearly. These are veterans, by the way, both
republican and left left and right. There are
some existing on both sides.
But he goes, what I did not expect
was to find evidence of CIA conspiring with
Assad
to sink the ship.
Now this clip was important in and of
itself. Now watch the full video there as
well. But it's about the thing he says
in the beginning.
They wanted to bring us into World War
3.
Well, you know what? I think they still
do.
And I think that's part of what's happening
right now.
Is out there to die.
That's what our government wanted. That's what Israel
wanted. They wanted to bring us into World
War 3. On June 8th 1967,
the USS Liberty, a US Navy research vessel,
a spy ship, was stationed in international waters
off the coast of the Sinai Peninsula when
without warning, the ship came under attack by
fighter jets and torpedo boats,
resulting in the death of 34 American servicemen,
and leaving another 171
critically wounded. But the most shocking detail, the
attack was launched by America's closest ally in
the region,
Israel.
This is a story you've probably never heard
of before. And if you have heard of
the USS Liberty,
the story you've been told is probably not
what really happened.
The 6 day war of 1967 forever
reshaped the Middle East, solidifying Israel's position as
a dominant military power in the region.
But the lead up to this conflict was
marked by intense geopolitical maneuvering and escalating tensions,
including the threat of the Soviet Union joining
the conflict on the side of the Arab
nations.
During this period, US foreign policy was also
shifting.
President Kennedy had maintained a balanced approach in
the Middle East, supporting Israel while trying to
remain neutral.
But after his assassination,
President Lyndon Johnson took a much stronger stance
in favor of Israel. In a now famous
quote, Johnson told an Israeli diplomat,
quote, you have lost a very great friend,
but you have found an even better one.
And on the eve of the 6 Day
War, the United States sent one of its
most advanced navy research vessels,
the USS Liberty, commanded by captain William McGonigal
to international waters off the coast of the
Sinai Peninsula.
Officially,
its mission was intelligence gathering.
But some aboard the ship alleged there was
a far more sinister plan at play.
James, we were deliberately
sent there. All the ships were going one
way. We we really only once going that
way. We were we were sent there by
the Johnson administration
in collusion with the Israeli government to sink
that ship and blame it on the Arab
States.
Think about how important that is right now.
Look at everything else that's happening.
Right? There's a very important reality about false
flags and psychological operations that goes back a
long way.
And this is what they have been doing
to you for a long time. Your government
is real. It's the reality.
We could talk about Pearl Harbor. It's the
same conversation.
We've talked about this many times. Sending the
ships out. You know, the reality I mean,
I have a personal overlap. My my late
great great grandfather, great great great, I forget
exactly,
was there. He used to tell us the
story every time I went to see him.
And his point was that he was convinced
that they did. They sent them out there
to to avoid Basically, that they let their
their friends die. They woke them up on
the weekend that it was. They sent them
all out. They stood there and they they
they just stood out in the open, right,
sitting in the water,
rather on the ship, sitting out there and
then came back and it was over. And
he's he was convinced because he's right that
they did that to move those ships out
of the way and let this happen.
Same thing he's talking about here. This is
not new.
Your government has always been willing to sacrifice
you for their interests,
even if it's the interest of another government.
On May 30, 1967,
just 10 days before Israel's attack on the
USS Liberty,
general Mir Ahmed, the head of Mossad, the
Israeli equivalent of the CIA,
flew to Washington DC for a series of
secret meetings.
The first person he went to see was
James Angleton,
then the CIA's head of counterintelligence.
He then went to meet with CIA boss,
Richard Helms,
and then finally, a meeting with Robert McNamara,
the secretary of defense.
Now make sure you check it out. He's
doing good work.
The bottom line, guys, is this is important
to recognize in the bigger picture what your
government's capable of.
And you could ask whether it's just in
their interest or whether they're being influenced, bribed,
threatened. I don't know. It's up for you
to decide. But the reality is, obviously, this
is something to consider with all of these
conversations.
Now let's talk about
the rising
independent media and the manipulation we're seeing online
and how again, keeping this all their stuff
in mind.
A very clear weaponized influence. Well, you can
you can think it's Russia if that makes
more sense to you. Frankly, it should it
should matter just as much no matter where
it comes from. But entities
and again, whether that's in collaboration with your
own government, the CIA. Entities influencing content,
backing creators.
We've always known this was there.
And asking yourself whether that might be more
pronounced and bigger and more influential than you
recognize
in order to get very certain things done,
potentially even just one thing for the interest
of another government.
I'm not saying I even think that. I'm
just saying that is possibly what we're dealing
with here. It could be as simple as
that. It could be more abstract. But what
we wanted
hopefully, people can take away from this is
the undeniable reality that that is happening.
And we need to see there's people that
are, like, just like I keep saying, like
a technocratic pied piper walking you into the
control structure.
So Elon Musk shares this.
It's a little meme. It says it's like
a little breakdown.
Of course, being aimed against the other side
saying, someone has done a thing.
Then the next box down says, are they
on our side? And then it splits in
two directions.
On one side, it says yes. Then the
next box says okay, then it's fine.
The other side says are they are they
on our side? It says no. The next
one says, bastards.
It's a bit to be a joke. Right?
But also kind of an indictment of the
democrats.
He doesn't say that in here, but obviously,
that's how it's being taken. And, of course,
the reality is what Tiberias says. What's funniest
of all is that both Democrats and Republicans
will share this meme criticizing each other while
both being absolutely correct.
I love Tiberias. He really does see it
in my opinion. How similar both camps act
is ludicrous to those who see it,
and preposterous
to consider
so many don't.
And he uses that great Spider Man meme.
But the point is that Elon's sharing this
because he's trying to, you know, make try
to make put himself above it all. Like,
look at how dumb everybody else you're literally
creating, you're cultivating
an entire community where that seems to be
the guiding principle.
Twitter files and all the rest of this
stuff. It was a it's a running joke.
Every and again, it's not even about whether
some of the information was there was, as
we've already shown you before he did that,
accurate. The reality was training you to blindly
go along with narratives constructed based on person
the person's
clout alone.
Right? Well, we could trust him, therefore we
don't need this. You always need source material.
You always need to verify information because they
could just be wrong. Right?
Or lying.
In this case, everything we're looking at, left
and right, it's the same thing. Right? Oh,
who is it? Who's saying it? Oh, okay.
They're on our side? Then who cares? Don't
say that about Trump because that'll hurt him
and we want Kamala to lose. So we
shouldn't tell the truth. Right? Don't highlight what
Kamala just did because that'll only give Trump
the win. Obviously, the truth is more important
than those kind of dynamics. Always.
Despite whatever they wanna tell you as being
an adult today. We're supposed to just vote
for the lesser of evils because that's what
grown ups do. No. That's what blind followers
do. That's what people who have given up
do. That's what blackfield actually looks like.
Elon says well, first first Mario Nofal says,
always rising these people up who are just
mindless repeaters of the propaganda, Trump considers Elon
for role in auditing US agencies. Are we
serious?
It says, Trump is reportedly eyeing a plan
to involve prominent business executives, including Elon, in
auditing federal agencies to identify programs to cut.
Elon has already shown interest in taking on
the role, according to Washington Post. And he
responds, I can't wait. There's a lot of
waste and needless regulation in the government that
needs to go. I agree.
Are we really gonna pretend that Elon is
the one that fills that role? Like, this
persona they've created about him being some
studious businessman.
I mean, come on, guys. It's not even
remotely. Look at what he said and done
in the past. Look at the failures of
things he put forward. He's got a lot
of money and influence and he loves to
frame himself as some kind of technological
wit. It's just not apparently the reality.
He if if take away the 1,000,000,000 of
dollars in influence,
I don't think he's as spectacularly unique as
we love to pretend he Either way, obviously,
I have a different opinion than some people
on where this is all going, so you
can claim that's what's flavoring that opinion. I
frankly just think it's the reality.
But do we really pretend that he's gonna
be the one to, like, identify where things
are failing or where they're using too much?
I mean, frankly,
even his business sense over the years does
not even remotely line up with that. Or
the bottom line is there's a 100000 people
out there that would probably be much better
at the job. But, of course, of course,
if it was a black woman and lesbian
as opposed to the best person on the
job, we would all scream woke policies, but
if you choose a South African oligarchy
technocratic billionaire who also is equally unfit for
the job, we won't call that out because
otherwise you see my point?
It's always what flavor we like to criticize.
He's not the best person for that job,
so we should care about that. But of
course, I'm anti whatever you wanna frame it
as, so go ahead. The bottom line is,
these people hated each other before 30 seconds
ago, just like everybody else. Or at least
that's what they were saying as it suited
their interest in the moment.
I'll get to that in a second. All
the many different you know, everybody that's lined
up right now have videos of calling each
other how bad they are. You're this or
you're that or you're stupid or I don't
trust you.
So they're either lying then or they're lying
now. Or both, if that even possibly makes
sense.
Here he is saying a Trump victory is
essential
to the defense of freedom of speech, which
you're not doing. Secure borders, which none of
you seem to care about other than digital
IDs,
safe cities,
and sensible spending. Of course, sensible spending. Right?
Because that's they're all so good at that,
aren't they?
All the massive unrealistic debt we were put
in during the pandemic, shutdowns which we didn't
need, that Trump was responsible for, and the
emergencies and the for Defense Production Act, which
they blame on anybody else, or everything else
before that, or Trump declaring bankruptcy, and how
many times he did, but still made
sensible spending because we like to say that.
Or Musk, same point.
Safe cities? In what way are we talking
about? Because they love to be like, look
at those bad democrat cities, which I'll just
point it out too. Horrible.
But there's also a lot of republican cities,
which are also pretty bad. And just because
we wanna highlight certain aspects of certain things,
to pretend like that makes the other be
good, that's a lesser of 2 evils right
there. Well, sure. I'll be the first to
point out that some of the worst locations
I can see are gonna be democrat cities.
But I can show you a lot of
republican locations that are not even remotely positive.
But I guess because it's less or bad,
that seems to be what we go for.
I want the lesser bad cities. How about
that?
Anyway, my point is highlighting the fact that
these are not remotely what these people actually
are. But not Mario says, new polls show
Trump is leading in key battleground states because
we all like polls when they say what
we think, even though they're usually not true.
But here's what he points out.
A weird chalk drawing, I guess, of him
quoting the same thing he just said. A
Trump victory is essential.
Defensive freedom
of speech.
But that's not what Trump wants. That's not
what any of them fight for. I'll show
you in a second, but that's the narratives
we like to repeat.
Manchow Sint points out, freedom of speech? We
can't even make jokes on cyclists on this
site. Imagine the level of censorship toward political
tweets.
And he's right. They censored a tweet of
him making fun of the cyclist. I mean,
I've I think we've even talked about this.
But it's everywhere. It it's not even around
Israel alone.
They'll censor hate speech. They'll censor all sorts
of stuff. And guess what? Almost 90% of
the time, they've already complied with government edicts
to censor. And I I think what somebody
was just pointing out, but despite their focal
point on Brazil and others, they've already completely
acquiesced with plenty of countries' demands.
Why don't we care about that?
Politics.
Because it works for the narrative.
And by the way, in his own his
own lawsuit, it states very clearly that they've
already met or exceeded basically all of what
GARM's demands were. So then what was the
whole thing about? To make it look like
GARM was dissolved when in reality, as Mike
Benz pointed out, the the structure despite dissolving
the umbrella was completely functional?
Well guess what weird we don't talk about
that,
because they were partnered with Garm the month
before they did all that. They repartnered, yeah.
But you know, who cares about all the
facts? Let's get back to the partisan discussion,
Ryan. Well here's Elon Musk citing Doge Designer
saying, Elon spent
$44,000,000,000 to revive free speech worldwide.
Like, it's just so pathetic. Like, at least
say that he spent this to try to
fight for free speech. To continue to ignore
the fact that they'll tell you freedom of
speech but not reach, and here's RFK Junior
coming out and tweeting, that is explicitly not
free speech. He just said that, like, 3,
4 days ago.
And calls out Twitter and for suppressing content.
He just said that online.
Who cares though? Because he's saving free speech
because we like to say that out loud.
While censoring things around Israel or working with
the IDL or, you know, all the things
that 30 seconds ago most Republicans would have
called out, but not because Elon with his
sync. You know, it's all all good now.
But he says, your support's greatly appreciated.
But don't also forget, by the way, you
know, the guy saving free speech has 60
different suppressive flags on
TLav's account alone.
But I guess we all put that to
bed because we don't wanna talk about it
anymore. Right? APAC tracker is one of the
ones that showed me this, but this was
circulating. It was very big for about a
day and a half, like, less than a
day. It got shown that using Grok, you're
able to highlight the different tags that were
placed on people in the platform.
And then, weirdly, after it became sort of
viral, 8 they shut down Grok, put it
back up, and couldn't do it anymore. What
do you know? What a coincidence.
Nobody had more tags than me. But, you
know, VakeShields and and and Infowar, they can
all call themselves the most censored man in
America.
Pretty sure that we fit that bill these
days. And it used to I used to
reflexively kind of not say, I don't see
anybody who is dealing with the same with
the kind the level that we are. Now
I'm not talking about financial things with what
they're dealing. I'm talking about the amount of
platforms, the amount of near constant acts, and
things like this. More tags than anybody on
Twitter. That's just simply the static reality.
That's not free speech if you are suppressing
our content like you provably are right now.
Don't forget this stuff, guys, because these things
get put to bed.
Here's Elon Musk
citing RK
junior, who says Kamala Harris, and you saw
this going around. Says Musk has lost his
privileges. Like, ask yourself why in the world
you would say something like that?
Now, yes, of course, she could just be
just to be clear, for those maybe new,
she is a monster.
Just as bad as Trump as far as
I'm concerned. They're both actively doing the same
problematic things from different flavors, different angles. But
my point is, let's not make it pretend
that I think she's somehow better. She is
horrible.
My point is, she's even worse than Trump
on paper because I think the reality is
to drive you in that direction. I've said
it many times. I hope I'm wrong. I
hope Trump saves the world. But the reality
is, you must be aware, even if she
thinks this, which is ridiculous and stupid and
naive or ignorant to the constitution understanding,
her political advisers know that. Her political advisers
know that half the conversation, if not the
country,
recognizes
free speech. The first amendment is not a
privilege.
It's an inherent right as literally stated by
the constitution, you guys know they know that.
Right? Even if they wanna convince you otherwise,
they know that. If they handpick the way
her the way her hair flows and the
kind of shirt she wears, they're sure as
hell gonna make sure they know what she's
saying and how, just like Trump.
So when they come out and she says,
Musk has lost his privileges to free speech,
does that not feel a little bit staged
in order to go, wow.
Okay. Who who's actually fighting for free speech?
Oh my god. It's Elon Musk and Trump.
Oh my god. How perfect that lines up.
I could be wrong.
But I just find it to be a
little bit cartoonishly obvious right now. And he
says, can someone please explain to her that
freedom of speech is a right, not a
privilege? Now, in in RFK's defense, he did,
I think right around this same time, or,
like a few days after, tweet
about how Twitter was not doing that.
In fact, here, let's just bring it up
since I've said it more than once. Now,
I I can always do this and show
you remind you guys how to search specifically
on here.
I just end up searching anything, and you
go up from the search bar, go to
search,
advanced search,
type in the words Oops. What was it
again?
It's freedom
of speech or reach. There you go. So
any words you wanna type in right there,
and then go to the accounts.
Type in the account, and it should pop
up.
Unless they censored it,
suppressed it. Oh, there it is right there.
Freedom of speech. This is on August 31st,
so the day after. So I was right.
The freedom of speech without freedom of reach
is not
freedom of speech.
That's a big deal. And he also says
other where, like in the same day about
Rumble and Twitter not, you know, suppressing content.
I just it seems out of line
with what they're all doing. I think it's
very crazy, especially if Elon is now seemingly
part of the administration.
He said there's news highlights, then why did
you praise Twitter as being the bastion of
free speech? And here's Elon literally
saying, freedom of speech not reach.
That's very interesting, right? It's it's Is he
lying there or is he lying there? Right?
That's the whole point we're gonna get to
in a second.
But why this is so interesting to me?
Save that for you.
Is obviously, as he's highlighting here that this
is the point. And I think this is
about trying to push this idea that she
is the one fighting it, but you over
here are making the same point about what
they're all working with. And all of them
are leaning into Twitter being the savior of
free speech. So it's like they're creating this
false dichotomy where no option within it is
giving you free speech. Hey. What do you
know? It's the lesser of evils in a
free speech play.
Telling you guys, if you think we're it's
an adult thing to do, to settle for
the lesser evils, you are the most lost
person in this conversation.
I'm not saying that gives you another pot,
like, if you can't recognize that maybe we're
in a position where they've set this up
so it's designed to fail or get what
they want, Maybe we need to take a
couple failures to get the thing back on
track. That's not giving up. It's recognizing the
harsh reality they put you in, fighting for
the possible
while giving other solutions and acknowledging if you
wanna vote, go ahead. If you think it's
gonna make a difference. The bottom line is
people telling you, what else are we gonna
do? She's worse, so go to him. That
is giving up.
That's accepting
the broken reality and operating within it. That
is what you get it. I mean, again,
it's sad that anybody pretends that's logic.
He goes on to say, there has to
be a responsive Or she says, there has
to be a responsibility
placed on these social media sites to understand
their power. Now, the statement's not necessarily inaccurate,
but that in no way should mean that
they should be suppressed for what they can
say, that people should be censored.
The point is, there is a point to
be made about the power that someone like
Elon Musk clearly can wield through this platform.
Now, I'm not even saying that means x,
y, and z. We just have to acknowledge
that there's an issue with this. And how
But I I argue that that probably is
by design to drive us into a place
where we rationalize
some kind of control over the platform,
while simultaneously framing Elon, the republican side of
this, as the forlorn heroes, fighting against the
censorship.
Right? It seems far too easy. Wow. You
can then prove within it that he's actually
not even fighting for free speech. Like, that
right there should prove that to
you. But it says if they don't police
content to conform to government approved narratives, they
will be shut down. That. Oh, that's the
translation. I was gonna say point is, there
has to be responsibility.
Now who decides that? Not the government.
Right? The bottom line should be these platforms
should be acknowledged for like, I in in
a real
objectively free speech field where it's not being
like, the point is that people, I would
argue, would begin to call these things out.
I mean, frankly, it's already happening. But we're
all my point is if you removed all
of the censorship, including Elon Musk and Twitter
censorship,
then there might be a possibility for some
kind of a real conversation. But that's not
happening.
And same with the same with the government
side of this and driving different actions.
He says, this is what she actually believes.
Which I guess you could assume that, but,
yeah, it was always funny because free speech
is the bedrock of democracy. So you don't
believe in democracy then, or you don't believe
in free speech? And the democratic party
wants to destroy it.
It's just so childish. The the now you
guys people respect anything about you or want
you to be free or want you to
have free speech. They're all using this dichotomy
to keep you in position, to keep you
in the effing hamster wheel.
But they're the baddies and they wanna destroy
everything, but we're trying to save it all
despite everything that challenges everything everywhere. But, you
know, let's just go along with the fun
narrative.
And just as I'm sure you could tell
it it's so embarrassingly obvious. But, again, I
think people are starting to see it. Here's
Tora Judaism making a point about this. It
says, we don't know if our channel was
deliberately being shadow banned, but there is a
shadow ban on Twitter.
Many of our followers can't even access our
posts. We have received such complaints. I wonder,
what is our crime and where why is
there a shadow ban?
Nobody's gonna answer that. They don't care because
it's happening to people specifically around the Israel
conversation. I I think we all know why.
Zionism,
Authentix,
c h e q, Israel explicitly Israel influenced
at things that are taking place almost solely
on Twitter right now.
Now Elon Musk is saying graphic he put
out, but here's what Sally Agra said. Again,
the statement says, a Trump victory is essential
to defensive freedom of speech, secure borders, safe
cities, and sensible spending.
He says he literally spent $8,400,000,000,000.
That's that's the talking about the pan his
last administration,
and wants to deport people for criticizing Israel.
I love Sal. I like he's just because
he's again, same thing. He's very he sees
through the vote the lie about our current
voting dynamic. He sees through the lie of
the 2 party illusion.
I wanna I'm I'm we're gonna connect again.
I already reached out to him before as
we get closer to the actual fake voting
dynamic.
But I mean, it's just embarrassing to pretend.
Like, I get I get the narrative around
it. The republicans will jump in and say
this in spending like, the same republicans, mind
you, that will criticize everything about the pandemic
illusion, but then defend his spending during the
pandemic illusion. Because it totally makes sense.
Right? Because it totally makes sense. Right? Sad.
And I know people can sense that, so
call others out, whether they're Republicans or not,
for playing these, you
know, these games.
Sean Maguire says, Elon is one of the
best in the world at synthesizing complex information
and seeing a path forward. God.
That's just so it's it's just inferior. Yeah.
Because he they're the best at everything all
the time. And Trump and everybody, they're so
good. They're so smart. They're so great.
Or not. Or they're really flawed, terrible people,
and we just love to make this case
because it works for our partisanship. But it's
just so gross. This ideal I this lionizing
of people
that are not what they are pretending they
are.
He's not always right,
as none of us are, but he has
an incredible track record of seeing non obvious
things years ahead of others. I don't even
I don't agree with that at all. I
mean, he's got in in some cases where
he's done things that I think are, you
know, groundbreaking or pa are good or or
or or
innovative.
But if I don't agree with that framing
at all. Now, this is somebody completing let's
say on the other side. Elon's lost his
mind. He's gone a completely insane naga cult.
He's completely lost it. I don't agree with
that either. I frankly just think he's playing
a role. I think he is playing a
perfect role of the Pied Piper of the
republicans into this control structure. That's what I
think. But here's Elon response to Sean saying
he's the best of everything all the time.
I have never been materially active in politics
before.
But this time, I think civilization as we
know it is on the line. Whenever you
hear these kind of, like, ridiculous, cartoonish, hyperbolic
statements,
ask why.
This is the equivalent of this is the
most important election of our lifetime. That's what
he's saying. He's got he's
got countless tweets over the last so many
weeks of basically the same sentiment. If that
Trump, we're all gonna die. If we don't
have Trump, we're gonna get communism. If we
let Kamala win, we're all gonna lose our
freedoms constantly.
He says if we wanna preserve freedom and
a met meritocracy
in America, because that's what we all agree
we have. Right?
Then Trump must win.
You know what's funny about it is when
they want to from the republican side of
the illusion, it's all about how the democrats
have destroyed this country and we don't have
what we should and they're ruining everything. But
then when they want it to be good,
they're aware of the meritocracy and the freedom
and we have all the
okay. Well, then it's not equally democrat that
are doing you know, it's just it's just
so lazy.
But, you know, if you apply logic to
these things, it's easy to see.
But same tweet,
defiant l says people might not like him,
but he's the only choice we have
Or they have. Telling you,
only choice you have.
I simply said black pill.
And he says, what's the alternative?
Same old thing.
So if all you're saying is that you
don't have any other choice, then you just
admit it. I've given up.
I have given up.
I'm being pressured to choose what I don't
want, and I'm pretending like that's what we
all should do because that's what grown ups
do. You've just given up. You don't if
you've either been convinced that you don't have
a choice and then don't frame that as
doing the right thing, or you have chosen
to give up and go along with the
with the flow.
We're we're over here showing you other solu
yeah. Solutions that seem difficult,
but not it's still another path.
You are the one going, that's the only
thing. Now, yes, some of the people on
the side of this are saying Trump is
the most amazing thing ever. But most of
the conversation is, yeah, we get it. They're
all bad. But he's less.
I just don't know why in the world
we pretend like that's anything but giving up.
Sal Diagoras says, and this is not to
be taken as we should do nothing. It's
just funny. He says or the meme says,
for 50 years, I voted, and for 50
years, things have gotten worse.
But I have a really good feeling about
this election.
You know, the old, if you do the
same thing and respect a different result, you
know. The point is not to do nothing,
but to find a different path.
The same old thing is gonna give you
the same old thing.
Now here is where the contradictions come in,
and I think this is very important. I
think this one section here will be a
good thing to clip out.
Now this is not an attack on Trump
or the Republicans.
As as I've tried to make clear,
I think self I think Kamala Harris is
a joke.
Like, far more than Donald Trump. I think
Kamala Harris and everything they're doing is abs
absurd.
You've taken one of the least popular people
in this entire conversation and just on a
dime said, she's the greatest, and we're all
supposed to pretend like your own followers know
that's stupid. And some of them go along
with it because they hate Trump or because
they don't wanna look bad, but they all
somewhere in their minds know that doesn't make
any sense. Yay, Kamala.
My point in saying all that is that
I think it's self evident that she is
the least
likely of all of this.
So I I don't I why it's not
like the game they play in the corporate
media even they don't even do that anymore
is where it's one story here, one story
there. That's balance. It's not self saying it's
fake balance.
That's the truth. Period. And we could be
wrong about that sometimes,
the facts.
But the reality is that in my opinion,
it's self evident that she is ridiculous and
that everyone sees that. So why would we
continue to go look at that just to
make it a balance? No. The point in
my opinion is I think Donald Trump is
the one being shoved down your throat right
now. Even to the Democrats, which a lot
of them are now going, I see it.
Trump's the one. Okay.
With all of these people, I think it's
obvious this is about my point being that
your vote doesn't translate. We don't live in
the place we think we do. We should
be fighting for that. A vote in a
representative system is paramount! I just don't think
we have that right now. And all that's
to say is that this is the next
person being shoved in front of you as
the one that we're grudgingly supposed to accept.
So my point is I want you to
see who this person is and what they're
really trying to do. And even if even
if Kamala gets put there, all the same
things are gonna happen.
That has to matter to you. So here,
focusing on the Trump overlap, RFK, Elon Musk,
Thiel, and everything else, Vance, here are some
things that I think you should care about
if you care about the facts. If you
care about who these people really are, not
just the narratives being spun to make it
appear that one's worse or better than the
other.
So here is Elon Musk, or rather Donald
Trump, calling Elon Musk a BS artist.
Say he's not gonna buy Twitter. Well, I
told you he's a BS artist. He's not
real. And then here's Elon Musk saying Donald
Trump is too old and shouldn't be in
power because anybody else would be better. Well,
yeah. That's weird, isn't it? Couple years later,
they're acting like they're they're gonna save the
world. So you're telling me that in 2
years, suddenly they changed their opinions of each
other? That's certainly possible.
Not for every one of them though. Not
for every single one of them. Trump, Elon
Vance,
RFK.
Every one of them thought the other was
a POS until suddenly they're all gonna save
the world together. Well, you know what? I
hope you're right. But I think there's obvious
reason to be a little skeptical here.
Another one of our highest priorities under a
Republican Congress will be to stop left wing
censorship
and to restore free speech in America.
And go out, by the way, while I'm
here and sign up now for truth social.
It's hot as a pistol and you see
that I pulled that one right.
Leon's
I tell you what.
See, I love this by the way. He
does this all the time. And I try
to point this out, people act like I'm
crazy.
So he makes mistakes like that. He said
Leon. He meant Elon.
But if this isn't important, this is just
a fun passing point where he he does
this in his talking points sometimes and people
read into it. Maybe. But his point, he
just he just made a mistake. And he
but he brushes it off and he acts
like he meant to say it. Leon, I'll
tell you what. Elon meant this. I just
think that's important to think about. So a
lot of times this happens where he kinda
just
fudges his way through things.
See that? I pulled that one right.
Leon's
I tell you what.
Elon
is not gonna buy Twitter.
What he did though? Where did you hear
that before?
From me.
From a I said Trump's always right. Fake
accounts. She says fake. Lot of them.
No. He's got himself a mess. You know,
he said the other day, oh, I've never
voted for a Republican. I said, I didn't
know that. He told me he voted for
me. So he's another bullshit artist, but he's
not gonna be buying it. You're not? He's
not gonna be buying it. Although he might
later. Who the hell knows what's gonna happen?
He's You got all of that. He said
he won't buy it 5 times in a
row and then he'll be maybe maybe though.
Hey. Then later, Trump was right. He knew
he'd buy it.
He give you what you want. Here's both
sides of the story. You pick which one
I said. How's that work? Got a pretty
rotten contract. I looked at his contract, not
a good contract.
Interesting. I mean, these are small points by
the way, at least that was just the
point is, he said he was a BSRist.
He said he wouldn't do that. Here's what
he responds. Elon Musk, 2022,
says, I don't hate the man, but it's
time for Trump to hang up his hat
and sail into the sunset.
That's that's interesting. He says, Dems
should also call off the attack. Don't make
it so that Trump only his way to
only his way to survive is to regain
the presidency.
Adam says, I'm a little surprised this is
your take. I say Trump DeSantis 2024,
DeSantis 202832.
This is the time before they suddenly hated
each other. Right? It says Trump would be
82 at the end of term, which is
too old to be chief executive of anything,
let alone the United States.
If DeSantis runs against Biden in 2024, then
DeSantis will easily win. He doesn't even need
to campaign.
Now just the point is that they could
just be saying what they want you to
hear, but then that should make you really
question what maybe they're doing that now. Maybe
they hate each other lying to you now.
Maybe they lied then. They're but the point
is these people are grifters.
They're just telling you what works for them
to make them make money, to succeed, to
influence.
Here they are telling you that they don't
really like each other. Right? Here is RFK
Junior. Great clip from Decentured News. 30 seconds
before he trains to be Donald Trump's the
worst person possible. He'll do this and he'll
do this. He'll ruin that. But now I'm
gonna work with him because he'll do all
the right things.
The eventual debate left no doubt
that neither president Trump nor president Biden is
prepared to unify our nation.
In fact, their rhetoric and their actions will
only divide us further. I've made the heart
wrenching decision
to suspend my campaign
and to support president Trump.
If an establishment Democrat wins
or if Donald Trump wins, the cold civil
war is only gonna intensify.
We're gonna get more of the same, more
division,
more poverty,
more debt,
and all of these crises
will only accelerate. Don't you want a president
who's gonna get us out of the wars
and who's gonna rebuild the middle class in
this country?
He put a Goldman guy in charge of
the Treasury Department,
an Exxon CEO in charge of State Department,
a pharma president in charge of HHS,
a Verizon lobbyist in charge of the FCC.
Don't you want the regulatory agencies to be
free from corporate corruption?
Yeah.
And that's what president Trump told me that
he wanted.
Coal and oil lobbyists around EPA and the
Department of Interior respectively,
a big ag robber baron as the head
of the Department of Agriculture,
and the neocon
militarist
John Bolton
as national security adviser. He also told me
that he wanted to end the grip of
the neocons on US foreign policy.
I'm not a fan of president Trump. I
wanna beat him
in a campaign on a level playing field.
I wanna talk about his issues about locking
down the economy, shutting down 3,300,000
businesses, about running up a $34,000,000,000,000
debt,
about engaging us in forever wars and doing
favors for Wall Street. Don't you want a
president who's gonna get us out of the
wars and who's gonna rebuild the middle class
in this country?
His pick as vice president
is a salute to the CIA
and to the intelligence community and to the
military industrial complex.
Their gravy train is gonna continue. Are you
going to
actively campaign for president Trump?
Yes. I will. I'm gonna work to get
him elected. He reauthorized
FISA
and the Patriot Act. President Trump
shut down 3,300,000
businesses. President Trump said that he was gonna
run America like a business,
and he came in and he gave the
keys to all of our businesses
to a 50 year bureaucrat who'd never been
elected to anything and had no accountability.
He closed down 3,300,000
businesses
with no due process, no just compensation in
violation of the 5th amendment.
With the lockdowns, the mass mandates, the travel
restrictions,
president Trump presided over the greatest restriction on
individual liberties this country has ever known.
How do we ignore something like that? Do
you think RFK Junior just changed his mind?
I mean, it's just shocking to hear stuff
like that because it's the reality. Now, there's
I'm sure whatever narrative you wanna insert to
somehow makes rational
explanations about why he would've done it even
though it destroyed you know, he was convinced
like, one of the ones I just keep
hearing, it's not his fault. He was told
that by the advisers he brought on.
It's like, okay. Fine. You can argue that
he was misled, but it's still his responsibility.
This way this game of removing them as
responsible be even though they're 1 that means
he's not a leader, guys. A leader is
the one responsible.
You take responsibility for the choices that you
allow. And even if you were misled, it's
still your responsibility. But I mean, I can
get a I can go along with the
idea that maybe he didn't intentionally do it,
but that's not what people are saying. Right?
And frankly, I don't think that's true at
all. I think it's obvious where we are,
especially now that he's still to this very
day, tells you that injection is good and
saving lives.
Don't you want a president who's gonna protect
America's freedoms
and who
is gonna protect us against
totalitarianism.
He didn't stand up for the Constitution
when it really mattered. He broke his promise
to declassify the JFK
assassination
files. President Trump also
assaulted the first amendment or fair failed to
defend press freedom
when he continued president Obama's persecution and prosecution
of Julian Assange. The Trump White House also
went after the 4th amendment prohibitions
against warrantless searches and seizures with this intrusive
track and trace surveillance systems
that obliterated our rights to privacy in this
country. Don't you want a president who's gonna
protect America's freedoms
and who
is gonna protect us against totalitarianism.
President Trump's beloved operation warp speed
shut down jury trials
for any corporation
that was involved in COVID countermeasures. Here's what
the 7th amendment said.
No American
shall be denied
the right of a trial
for a jury of his peers
in cases or controversies
exceeding $25.
There is no pandemic exception, and the waiver
of the 7th of mandarin
for
for corporations
that were involved in countermeasures
meant that no matter how a how reckless
the corporation behaved, no matter how negligent was
it was,
no matter how toxic or unnecessary the ingredients,
no matter how shoddy the testing,
no matter how grievous your injury,
you could not sue that company.
Can you imagine? They knew that, by the
way. Can you imagine what happened during that
time frame? Like, they already get passes and
and find ways around it, but these big
corporations
and there's a whole there was a a
years period,
potentially, for for all we know, still going.
But arguably through that time period where they
just didn't like you said, ingredients and and
safety and safety.
There was a a free for all. It's
pretty much always a free for all in
this country, but it's a free for all
more than ever during that time frame. I
made that point during the time.
It's these these kinda things have to matter.
You can't just be like, this idea that
this somehow made sense. You can't do that
based on some hypothetical, we now know it
was a lie, we now know they knew
it was a lie, and in internally was
that they knew, within the administration.
But, of course, they always give a pass
because he was manipulated by Fauci.
Even though he gave Fauci a medal, but,
you know, we'll just forget all the facts.
They had a ticket to make anything they
want without any kind of accountability.
And don't you want a president
that's gonna make America healthy again?
President Trump has told me that he wants
this to be his legacy.
I'm choosing to believe that this time he
will follow through.
It's quite a big hope. Well, here's JD
Vance. Right? When he, 30 seconds ago, said
that he hated Trump. Funny how this is
all working out.
For Trump. The never Trump guy. I never
liked him. It makes you think that at
at a fundamental level, this is sort of
a he said, she said. Right? And at
the end of the day, do you believe
Donald Trump who always tells the truth? Just
kidding. Or you believe that woman on that
tape? I cannot stand Trump because I think
he's a fraud. Well, I think he's a
total fraud. I mean, how do you go
from that to supporting him like he's gonna
save the world?
You don't is the point. You just don't.
That this is a manipulation.
And JD Vance was put here by Teal
for obvious reasons that we'll get to. That
is exploiting these people who is a total
fraud. Like you said, I I agree with
you on Trump because I don't think that
he's the person I I I don't think
he actually cares about folks. So as a
conservative
who thinks that Trump does not have the
answers and isn't
qualified to be president.
What are you going to do this election,
if you don't mind saying?
My current plan is to vote either 3rd
party, or as I joke to my wife,
I might ride in my dog because that's
about as good as it it seems.
But, you know, I I I think there's
a chance if I feel like Trump has
a really good chance of winning
that I might have to hold my nose
and and vote for Hillary Clinton. Ultimately, I
think I'll probably vote 3rd party. I might
vote for this this new guy who I
really like, Evan McMullen,
who Think about that. Voting for Hillary Clinton
over I mean, it just
it's and it's just not some kind of
a political point. Like, objectively, she's probably one
of the worst people on the planet with
all the overlapping things we've talked about. And
we're gonna talk about you're gonna hold your
nose. That's as stupid as Bernie Sanders or,
Colsie Gabbard
spending the entire election telling you how bad
she was and then voting for her or
endorsing her. That's politics for you, and it's
disgusting. I actually, met the other day, but
but I I I think that that I
I'm I'm I'm gonna vote for I'm gonna
vote 3rd party because I can't stomach Trump.
I think that he's noxious and is leading
the white working class to a very dark
place.
Hey. Look at that.
Now what's interesting on a side note, here's
Michael Rapaport.
I just think he's the ridiculous per clownish
person,
who is basically, you know, look at look
at his Twitter account. He is an he
is an anti Trump guy.
Hating on or total orange man bad kind
of person. Right?
But not anymore because Israel,
which pretty much is to show you what's
guiding this. He basically now now he's sort
of going after Kamala. Right? And we've already
made points in the past about Trump and
he'll he'll in in Israel. I just think
it's embarrassing. Somebody like this who spent all
this time about how bad this person is
is now he goes, I always like my
presidential candidate on headphones and not answering questions.
That's definitely why he's trying to make a
joke. He's a terrible comedian about how she's
wearing headphones and not answering questions.
But my point is you can look at
his other,
conversations recently and he's leaning towards Trump because
Trump is Israel. In the conversation anyway, she's
also wildly pro Israel, but the choice is
supposed to be Trump. I think that's obvious.
Even his own peep peep his own followers
kinda push back on this. He's like, oh,
sorry. I wasn't where I was supposed to.
Not attack her. It just shows you how
ridiculous this all is. Everybody in these positions
are being driven.
Now here is Benjamin Fox going, here's Trump
saying Hillary's lucky he didn't put her in
jail. Oh, yeah. Is that the case? Lucky?
The idea that you clearly did not even
intend to do that and clearly are all
pretty much on the same side, whether it's
the Epstein overlaps,
the fact that you like, the the these
people are on the same side.
And, no, that's not fun for Trump supporters
to think about, but it's simply the reality.
And I'll make this case for you right
now. The point is he is beginning up
the same thing he did before the last
election. Lock her up and the fed, or
JFK documents,
none of which actually happened. But he knows
what you're he knows what you want to
hear, and now you're gonna get a re
a 2 point o version of that. Clinton's
always still on the table, so let's go
and throw it back out. She's lucky. Maybe
I'll do it again. Maybe I'll get her
this time.
And and peppered with whatever else you're gonna
hear about the border, about whatever new wedge
issues he's gonna tap into you talking about.
Bitcoin.
That's what's happening.
Here's what he said.
I'm leader again.
You will have unprecedented power.
Just on your own personal psychology, what does
that power do to you? Does it is
there any threat of it corrupting
how you see the world? No. I don't
think so. Look. I've I've been there for
4 years.
I could've done a big number on Hillary
Clinton. I thought it looked terrible to take
the president's wife and put her in prison.
She's so lucky.
I didn't do anything.
She's so lucky.
Hillary is a lucky woman. Does he sound
drunk or something to you? Like, am I
crazy? He sounds like he's slurring or talking
very slow. Maybe they slowed down the video.
And that's not, like, an attack on him.
I just think he sounds different than usual.
Because
I had a lot of people pushing me
to they wanted to
they wanted to see something, but I had
I I could've done something very bad. I
thought it looked so bad. Think of it.
You have the president of the United States,
and you also had secretary of state. Right?
She was.
But you're gonna put the president's wife in
prison?
And yet when I got out there, you
know, they have all these hoaxes. They're all
hoaxes,
but they have all these
dishonest hoaxes just like they did in the
past with Russia, Russia, Russia. That was a
hoax.
The 51 different,
you know, agencies or agents, that was a
hoax.
The whole thing was a hoax. The whole
there was Rather a misdirection
away from the obvious Israel influence that actually
came out in the investigation. So many hoaxes
and scams.
And
but I didn't wanna put her in jail,
and I didn't. And I explained it to
people. You know? They say, lock her up.
Lock her up. No. That's what you said,
man. You started that. It does it. We
won.
I said, we don't wanna put her in
jail. We wanna bring the country together. I
wanna bring the country together.
Is it funny how that works when you
want it to? Right? Like, the idea of
like, someone just made this joke about it
now. Like, they they it's just a flip
flopping of concepts.
The moment you it works for you to
to not do the thing you promised, we
just go, no. Shut up. It's about unity.
We're trying to be better. It's okay. Well,
if you had said that first or maybe
I had said that when he said lock
her up, you would've called me a lefty.
You see, it's just it's just flimsy. And
by the way, that works on both sides.
It's the same old dynamic. You don't bring
the country together by putting her in jail.
But then when I got out, you know,
they went to work on me. It's it's
amazing. And,
they suffer from massive
Trump Derangement
Syndrome. They all do.
Everybody in the paradigm.
Left and right. Trump Derangement Syndrome. TDS. Or
delusion, whichever way you wanna put it.
And I don't know if they're it's curable
from their standpoint.
So here are some other points where you
can just make sure you see that right
away. It wasn't after some kind of immediate,
like, longer dynamic.
Right away,
2016,
mind you,
Trump has praised Hillary Clinton as a great
woman and great president.
Here's the other one where he says at
the 2017 dinner that he's you know, I'll
I'll play them for you. This is not
some after 4 years afterthought or whatever else.
The bottom line is, it was clear that
this was never on the table. If you
actually understand, if you've read Whitney's research around
the idea, if you understand the overlapping dynamics,
it's clear that they are not adversarial.
Well, I think her history is far from
being over. I'd like to answer that question
in another 15 years from now. I think
she's gonna go down at a minimum as
a great senator.
I think she is a great wife
to a president,
and I think
Bill Clinton was a great president. You know,
you look at the country then.
You get the point. Here's the other one.
There is something
that I wanted to say, because I was
very honored, very, very honored,
when I heard that president Bill Clinton and
secretary Hillary Clinton was coming today. And I
think it's appropriate to I mean, this is
after running your campaign on lock her up.
So and I'd like you to stand up.
At the inauguration. Right? So you literally go
into this process. Now look, you could take
it at face value. I wanna bring the
country together. Well, I don't think any of
them actually want that, and clearly their actions
in no way did that. You don't go
on calling the democrats the most evil entity,
you know, fighting against them the entire time,
framing them as the adversarial point to your
entire administration, but act like it's all about
bringing them together. Of course, the one side
of it will argue that that was their
fault, that that's what they did. But it's
just it's always like that. They're both doing
it.
You don't step into your inauguration.
After that. You the point is it was
never on the table, guys. I think we
all we must be honest with ourselves and
recognize that.
Here.
Oh, so the the point there before I
go past it is the idea that clearly
you have to acknowledge that that doesn't line
up. So now we should be going into
this next step and next step and ask
ourselves, you know, maybe they're lying to us
now.
I know. It's shocking. Right? But the point
is that they're using these kind of lies
and divisions to drive you into very clear
positions. One of the ones we've been really
trying to call out because it's the most
obvious to see is the digital ID act
or digital ID aspect and using the SAVE
act and other dynamics
to convince you that this is necessary.
In fact, just like with the COVID 19
conversation, what did I say? Donald Trump being
in that position, which I still I think
was the plan, which WikiLeaks showed us, with
with Clinton's emails, making sure he was on
the final stage.
You could argue it's because they thought they
would win, but I don't think that's the
case. It's obvious in my opinion.
The bottom line is that him being there
pacified
what would have been the most resistant aspect
during all of that. The constitutional gun owners.
Right? The republicans that would have been the
most resistant to anything about suppression of free
speech, suppression of your rights. You can't go
outside, have to take this shot. Nobody. But,
of course, because Trump was there. Well, sugar
water or whatever else, whatever narrative got you
to think that it was all okay. Now,
the same thing is happening. We're at another
point, another inflection point here, where it seems
the most important to convince the Republicans
to take the next step.
So here's Elon Musk. Because not requiring ID
combined with mail in voting makes it completely
impossible to prove fraud. Asking why don't Democrats
want voter ID? But here's the interesting thing.
They do.
Every side of this is now calling for
digital identification. Just because they don't say we
want voter ID for vote it's the same
point. If they're all calling for digital identification,
it's the same point. And they are. Both
sides, or rather just your government, is driving
you in the direction of digital identification.
Because that's a sustainable development goal.
Not just one side. Both of them. But
because the right makes it only about voter
ID and frames it as the left doesn't
want that in that context, it suddenly becomes,
we want digital ID. But they don't say
that. They say, we want the SAVE Act
because that'll ensure it. But we already showed
you in the last show, the Biden administration's
already running forward with the mobile driver's license
discussion. So what those two things together do
is remove the other options from the SAVE
ID Act.
Which only leaves real ID compliant choices. Which
is the point.
I said and this is Elon Musk saying
that requiring ID. And I said, yes. But
the US government,
all of it, will use this opening to
require digital identification.
For everyone.
But UC is more than okay with that.
We don't need digital identification to secure voting,
assuming that it translates to the outcome currently,
or to enforce immigration law.
We don't. We can do these things, which
I do think are important, without the save
I the real ID compliant digital identification.
Both of which, though, are overlapped with that,
as I've already proven to you in this
very show.
But I I know a lot of conservatives
see this. But a lot pretty much all
of the team sport politic republicans are blinding
themselves to this. Just like the left.
Under whatever guys they're pushing us forward, the
point is they use the wedge issues to
convince you that it's necessary.
And he is on a tear about it.
Now here's the actual article I'll include for
you. Make sure you watch this. This is
important. Again, Katherine and I are gonna be
talking about this explicitly tomorrow.
Here, same thing. At multiple times a day.
Here he is sharing a little meme.
Kind of meant to be a joke where
he says, don't let Trump cheat.
Demand voter ID, paper ballots. Like, the point
is obviously that's what they're saying the republicans
want, democrats don't. So it's kind of a
joke. Like, don't let him cheat. So you
because the point would be, arguably,
if we don't want cheating, I would agree
with the idea of identification and paper ballots.
It makes sense.
Pasta and I talked about this about foreign
elections. The point is that's not what they're
actually driving for. Neither side.
They'll use the voter ID aspect to drive
it into digital identification.
The Just A Thought sums this up clearly.
It says,
when Trump becomes president,
he'll use his fan base's fear of immigrants
to manipulate them into supporting a smart wall,
which by the way, both are driving. We
played the clip of Kamala Harris pushing the
same concept. They're both discussing the biometric wall,
which overlaps with the digital identification,
with CBDCs, all of it. He says that
she says this won't be used to keep
people out as much as it'll be used
to keep Americans in. Then he'll use the
fan base's love of crypto to manipulate them
into supporting CBDCs and digital ID. Whitney here
believes it's sort of a privatization concept, a
public private partnership, a u j b diamond,
that kind of way. Right? JPMorgan, some kind
of private coin. But it will amount to
the same thing, and they just pretend it's
not. And the republicans will go along with
it because it's endorsed by Elon and the
rest of them. Trump is a Trojan horse
and if he's successful, she writes, will be
we will be trapped in a digital prison.
Don't pay your taxes? No leaving the country
for you. Didn't get vaccinated? No access to
your bank. Spoke out against the government? Watched
that social credit score drop. Just wait. The
next few years are gonna be the craziest
we ever experienced. Now I hope she's wrong.
I hope we can actually fight back against
this and not just blindly
sleepwalk into the lesser of 2 evils that
both of which will drive you here. But
she says for those of you who are
skeptical,
start looking at it.
This is the clip that Whitney and I
have from our our interview about the smart
wall dynamic.
Now Sal Aggress made a great point about
just sharing this graphic.
It's a graphic that shows
basically the growth in product, productivity and hourly
compensation
comparatively,
since 1948.
Now it shows a very interesting point, right,
in 1971,
where suddenly
your compensation
basically flat lined,
cup deviations here and there, while the productivity
continued to explode.
So what happened in 1971?
I can tell you. We removed ourselves from
the gold standard.
Nixon.
So what's interesting to think about here,
we knew going from away from the whole
Bretton Woods discussion into like, the point is
they shifted us into a different financial system
using fiat currency so that they could manipulate
you. And look at what they've done. They've
increased your productivity while paying you the same.
And it's just one of many aspects of
how this was a manipulation.
We're using fake money at this point. It's
not based on any real value other than
your belief that it has value.
And they abuse that. Printing money.
The point that I'm showing you this for.
What do you think is gonna happen once
we take the next step?
The next step is all digital currency, which
by the way, we already have a level
of digital overlap,
but we still have physical currency. Now once
we step into this idea, once digital IDs
become
demanded,
required,
it'll immediately shift into the same direction. They
will go into all digital currency. It's already
happening. They're already pushing this around the world.
What happens then?
My belief is that we're gonna see yet
another graph just like this far, far more
concerning.
I can't really predict what exactly it will
look like. But my point is, the reason
this shifted is because they were able to
manipulate what you thought you had. Manipulate the
value of what you were using. Can you
only imagine what it will be when it's
completely on it's just digital ones and zeros.
That's what they're driving for. That's what Trump
and Elon and Thiel and Vance and Kamala
and Biden and all of them are driving
you into right now.
Now the biometric wall
is an obvious overlap to this.
And it is the same conversation under the
guise of immigration.
Right? So let me play this for you.
So set up the next point, just so
we can see it again, the biometric wall,
just in case you haven't heard him say
this. Land, air, and sea. Now it's not
a new clip, but it is still his
discussion. It's still his direction. He even just
criticized Kamala for saying it. Because that's my
thing. They're both driving you in the direction
of this wall, which will be digital IDs,
it'll be biometric scans, it will include digital
identification, digital money, everything.
That's the direction of it. Not not the
wall explicitly with the money, but they're one
in the same direction.
One will necessitate the other. It is all
happening.
Alright.
We will finally complete
the biometric
entry exit visa tracking system, which we need
desperately.
For years, Congress has required
biometric entry exit visa tracking systems,
but it has never been completed. The politicians
are all talk, no action, never happens,
never happens.
Hillary Clinton,
all talk. Unfortunately,
when there is action, it's always the wrong
decision. Do you have a Right. And then
he stood up 30 seconds later and said,
they're good people. Leave them alone. We're good
now. Unity. Right? And then went right back
to calling her whatever else.
It's
these things are at the same conference. This
is ridiculous. This is the same time frame.
One one thing over here, one thing over
there. It's it's manipulation.
Point is, like I said last time, by
saying Hillary didn't do it, you're supposed to
you're supposed to be tricked into thinking, well,
then we should do it. Do it, Trump,
because Hillary couldn't.
That's how simple they think you are. Prove
them wrong. Notice,
in my administration,
we will ensure that this system is in
place.
And I will tell you, it will be
on land.
It will be on sea. It will be
in air. Yep. You will have a proper
tracking system.
Good. Yeah. Isn't that what we all want?
Weren't we all clamoring for a biometric
tracking system during COVID night? Oh, no. It
was the opposite. Funny how a different narrative
that we all just jump for are the
ones that are. The truth at the end
of the day,
ask yourself why you would need a air
by the so if we're talking about illegal
immigration, are they flying jumbo jets into the
I mean, the point is
coming and going.
Land, air, and sea.
That's what it is. And they're gonna say,
well, we have to to make sure we
don't miss anybody. But guess who that affects
more than anybody? You, Americans,
by design.
So here is what b Caldwell highlighted, which
I think is interesting.
Found this, so this is what Donald j
j Trump is talking about. This is why
globalists create chaos and misery. It motivates ignorant
buffoons and gives government license to create invisible
shackles for our safety.
The road to hell is paved with good
intentions.
Good catch, b Caldwell. Thank you for sharing
this.
Here it is. Silicon Valley jumps into biometric
gold rush for Trump's other border wall.
Well, who do you think these Silicon Valley
overlaps are, guys? It's all the same people
that are currently stacking his cabinet right now.
He says under president Trump's this is 2017,
by the way. Under his tech technology companies
have started crashing in on cashing in on
the little noticed government push to ramp up
the use of biometric tools,
such as fingerprints and iris scanners to track
people who enter and exit the country. You
notice how they don't say illegal immigrants? Just
people who are coming and going. Largely
you.
Silicon Valley firms that specialize in data collection
are taking advantage of the provision tucked into
mister Trump's executive order on immigration.
See how that works? Which includes his controversial
travel ban that we you can see even
that itself was used to kind of hide
the bigger story. Oh, a Muslim ban, which
there and a lot of overlaps, there was
a point to be made, but this was
not the point.
This the the the buzz the ban wasn't
the point. The point was what he's got
going on here. It says that called for
a com a completion of the biometric entry
exit tracking system for screening travelers entering and
leaving the United States. See?
Everyone.
The tracking system was mandated in 1996 immigration
law passed by Congress but never fully implemented.
So that's that's gonna be the way this
gets covered. He's just doing what was supposed
to happen. That's what he said.
Do you want this? Is this what we
I mean, whether or not you think it's
supposed to happen, is that what you want
conservatives? Do you want a biometric tracking system
of coming and going from the country, as
well as the 100 mile,
con that's what it was. Constitution free zone.
Why couldn't I remember that the other day?
I kept saying con unconstitutional.
The constitution free zone around the United States,
this is an undeniable reality. The ACLU's covered
this. There's a 100 mile zone on the
border of this country that goes into the
country where the constitution doesn't apply according to
our government. The entire state of Maine exists
in that location.
The point is it is that what you
want? Do you want that to be extended
to the reality wherever inside this country you
are being subjected to the, obviously, that's not
what we want. Don't be played by the
Republican team sport politics narratives. As Catherine keeps
saying, don't let the Republicans trick the conservatives
into the control structure.
The point is, guys, this is where it's
going, and these same people are what we're
talking about. And as as,
Patriot Girl points out, same clip here about
the biometric tracking system in the wall,
as who owns the most Palantir stock. Well,
of course, Palantir, Peter Thiel,
overlapping Vance and Trump and everything else and
the involvement they're in, and the overlapping of
the COVID nineteen tracking system of working with
Israel to kill Palestinians. All of that's actually
happening.
What do you know? Palantir,
largest stockholders, Vanguard, BlackRock. Just like Rumble, by
the way.
Palantir Technologies. 4 here's what's interesting though. 42.46%
of all the shares were held by institutions.
Top institutional holders,
Vanguard, BlackRock. Morgan Stanley, little ways down. Almost
15% in total.
That's very influential.
Isn't it funny how these things don't matter?
Like, if this was Biden's campaign or Kamala's,
oh my god. It would be be 45
articles written about it all across these controlled
platforms.
Why is it not the other way around?
Isn't that interesting?
It's I frankly think it's obvious.
As Derek wrote in August 1st, the co
opting of Bitcoin,
Bitcoin Nashville,
Peter Thiel, Donald Trump, and Rumble, and the
overarching point of how we're watching this. This
was about specifically cryptocurrency and Bitcoin, but the
bigger picture in this article is about Peter
Thiel and the co opting of the entire
discussion, the the administration, the building of the
which, by the way, happens every time. Remember
Obama was Citibank?
Right? The same thing. We see these outlines.
This is how our country operates. We live
in some kind of oligarchy or what's the
other term for it, corporatocracy.
We're we're being I mean, really, we're talking
about fascism. We're talking about and that's not
about Trump. It's about all of them. The
idea of this game where it's communism, when
she's a communist, she's a socialist, and he's
a cap no. They're all authoritarian capitalist. They're
all control.
That's what they're all trying to put you
in a position where they can manipulate you.
They don't care what you call each other
as long as they get to control your
life.
And this is what we're seeing. We're watching
the corporations influence the outcome. That's that's what
fascism is. The overlapping, blurring the line between
corporate entities and your government.
Now Whitney's talked about this as well. That's
what we referenced on jill July 18th. The
man behind Trump's VP pick is worse than
you think. That's Vance,
who is is a puppet of teal, it
seems. The person who hated Trump, who got
placed on his administration as the vice president
that they just went along with.
And Phil is a huge backer of all
award. And by the way, Eric Schmidt, as
Derek has highlighted, is backing on the other
side of this. So it's Silicon Valley, as
Whitney's highlighted, basically pulling these strings.
Now here is what the CEO of Palantir
said. And this should alarm everybody. So remember,
this is the CEO of the company that
is essentially the privatization of the government contract
about surveillance of the United States people. Right?
Of of I mean, this is she talks
about the,
main core, about LifeLog, all these different discussions
that they basically turned into the privatized Palantir.
But what it is is the whole constituent
of government discussion that should we get in
a position where the government feels insecure, that
they're gonna potentially lose control. Well, they have
a list of people, probably include people like
myself, that are problematic, that are immediately meant
to be rounded up. That's what Palantir is
working with. That's what they are doing.
As well as surveilling you, as well as
surveilling Palestinians for Israelis to murder, as well
as surveilling you and your data around pow
of COVID 19 injections, they're they are a
part of the machine, the problem.
That is backing Donald Trump's administration explicitly.
The same administration working with everybody else telling
you they're saving free speech, but here is
what CEO Palantir had to say about saving
free speech.
Almost everyone in America is horrified by the
dramatic rise of anti Semitism,
which is not it does not receive the
reaction it should deserves.
And most Americans
would like to see leadership
on the Middle East,
on bringing hostages home, especially American hostages, and
clear statements about discrimination, even discrimination against Jews.
I feel
though I I think part of the reason
why leaders need to stand up is By
the way, sitting next to the,
of of of Pfizer
This is a very, very, very small minority
of America.
They succeed
in having an outsized,
impact
simply because
the rest of America thinks they're so idiotic
that this can't actually be dangerous or true.
But it is dangerous, and they do believe
these things. And if we do not speak
up, they will continue to tell themselves this,
and there will be a sense on their
side that it's okay to push the boundaries
and push Guess what? Even if what he's
saying is true, that's called free speech, but
he's also wrong. It's also a very gross
and obviously proven to be misrepresented topic. Remember,
one of the most obvious points was that
they called every single Palestinian protest an an
anti Semitic entity or,
incident.
And that's why they claimed this, Rose, 600%.
That's what they're citing, guys. That's what they're
claiming.
She stabbed me. He stabbed me in the
eye with the flag. No. You lied about
that. They were chanting kill all the Jews.
Nope. The police said you didn't that didn't
even happen and you made it up. They've
it's everywhere.
I'm not gonna say there's not racism. There's
obviously racism. But to pretend that this is
what they claimed it was, even though we
know as a matter of fact that there
was not just flagrant
lies, but active psychological manipulations carried out by
Israel.
It's undeniable.
The bottom line is they're telling you that
they're not allowed to have this opinion. First,
the point is it didn't happen. Not the
way they're claiming it. But just say there's
somebody out there saying, I think this about
Jewish people. I can call that person a
disgusting human being, but he has every right
to say his opinion, whether online or anywhere
else.
That's free speech. If you're not okay with
that, then be clear about the fact that
you do not believe in free speech. And
you know what? Maybe that's the way it
should be. I disagree,
but you're allowed to have that opinion. But
lying and calling it free speech because you
wanna pretend free speech is, you know,
this selective conversation, then you're just being you're
just you're lying to yourself.
The boundaries and push the boundaries. And so
as heinous as what these people are saying
is,
it it exists in part because there are
not enough people saying this is really dumb.
You see, that's not true at all. Ever
people all over the place are saying that's
gross. You're bad. That's a disgusting thing to
say. What you want is somebody stepping up
and making them stop,
making sure they're not allowed to say that.
That's what you're calling for. But you see
how it's careful not to actually say that.
This is hatred, and it will not be
tolerated.
Again, not Yeah. Eviscerating the first amendment, but
just using the first amendment to say, hey.
This is either stupid or hate David, so
what you're saying is you're calling on governments
to stand up and say, you're bad.
We don't like what you're doing. Is that
what you're are you honestly pretending that you're
expecting a control that you want? I mean,
it's it's a joke.
You know exactly what he's calling for. He
they're all wanting the government to stop you
from doing things, to stop you from saying
those things. Usually, even the interest of stopping
you from criticizing
government action through the guise of that. But
that's just a flimsy way to pretend like
we just want you to you we want
them to say that. No. That's what's already
happening. The free first amendment exists, people can
already call it out. So what you're calling
for is what's already here. We know that's
not what you want. Full. It's very hard
to know whether you're an idiot or you're
a demigod or you're just purely a hateful
person, but we disagree.
Wow.
So she frames that Palantir CEO, Alex Karp,
whose company's data mining software helps the IDF
kill machine to select targets including 18000 as
in children, very true, says we need to
scrape the first amendment to target anti semitism
in America. That's not what he said exactly,
but he did very clearly suggest that we
need action to stop you from saying these
things.
Now, here
is Oh, it didn't pop up. Oh, I
spelled it wrong.
Think it's that one.
Peter t No. Teals Palantir. Israel agree a
strategic partnership for BattleTech. Just in case you
wanted to have the evidence around that, which
you should.
How that's I'm thinking about it. This is
this is a genocide that we all can
see.
That company is helping. And by the way,
that's him right there. Speaking about antisemitism while
he's literally standing next to the most and
that's Theo, right there next to him. While
he's standing next to and with the people
committing the most obvious genocide we were seeing.
That's pretty disgusting. In fact, I find that
more grotesque than people who are simply being
racist.
Now I shouldn't even say it like that
because it's I mean, I I it's important.
We should care that people are saying they
are being disgusting to other human beings. But
in the bigger context of things, if you're
murdering children, I kinda think that's more important.
Now here is Trump with the other clip,
telling you what he wants with the Internet.
Let's connect the dots here and recognize this
is where it's going.
Because we're losing a lot of people because
of the Internet. And we have to do
something. We have to go see Bill Gates
and a lot of different people
that really understand what's happening. We have to
talk to them maybe in certain areas closing
that Internet up in some way. Somebody will
say, oh, freedom of speech. Freedom of speech.
These are foolish people. Yeah. You're a fool
for caring about freedom of speech, Trump says.
We have a lot of foolish people. We
have a lot of foolish people.
We've gotta maybe do something with the Internet
because they are recruiting by the 1,000.
That's terrifying.
Now
run at rapping with the 22 main points
here, and I'm gonna get some of the
Israel stuff in the next show.
This was the part about the technocratic regime
change. Kinda one of the main points I
wanted to get to, but it's this is
this is incredibly important.
So what we're highlighting here is this obvious
build
towards,
you know, really the
illusion, the construct that gets you stepping into
willingly
the thing they're building for you.
What I see coming in the future is
that this is in my opinion, the be
I I almost wanted to frame it like
the first technocratic regime change, but for all
I know it's happened many times.
But I can see the outlines of this.
And I see this as the kind of
the the future of where we're going.
And it worries me. Like, that the, we're
like, that we don't fully even understand the
new dynamic.
The idea that it's not about governments and
nation states, but more so this as we
keep seeing, the building of this sort of
technocratic elite, elitists,
that are dictating the actions of the world.
Garrison Lovely makes this interesting point, September 3rd.
The article is how a start up utopia
became a nightmare for Honduras.
Seems like more people should be talking about
how the a libertarian charter city, which I
don't think is what this was. Right? This
is my point about how people like Peter
Thiel pretend they're libertarians.
Using the guise of the kind of right
leaning libertarian freedom movement to hide what they're
really doing.
Authoritarian technocracy.
But a libertarian charter city startup funded by,
guess who,
Sam Altman?
Mark Anderson?
Peter Thiel?
Really? Yeah. Sure. Libertarian. Right? And is trying
to bankrupt Honduras. So what are we actually
looking at here? Is this is this a
an effort to control the state? Is this
an effort to influence financially? Is this an
effort to test out this this style?
I mean, ultimately what you're gonna see,
excuse me, is the these are
technocrats.
You under the guise of starting some libertarian
utopia, which by the way on top of
that, makes it seem like that's impossible, which
it's not.
Have taken advantage of this air this this
situation,
and are now using that just basically
what's the right word? To
not incapacitate,
but financially
cripple
this entire country,
which I guarantee was step 1 to something
bigger.
And we have to recognize how this is
something that overlaps with I mean, look at
what Elon Musk is doing. Look at the
way he engaged with the Venezuela
conversation. Like, we're watching and again, this is
not about whether they're allowed to say these
things. But there has to be a conversation.
That's my point about what she was saying.
Almost in a way to hide that. That
there has to be some level of responsibility
here. And I'm not saying Kamala Harris and
the censorship. That's not even remotely what I'm
saying. But the reality is obvious.
If we have these technocrats, these oligarchs, which
by the way, they've always been doing this,
but in a new way, using some kind
of technological
overlap to
explicitly like, let let's put it this way.
Over history, we've seen,
let's say, social media forward. We've seen the
US government, for example. Use social media to
manipulate the conversation, but then ultimately uses
kinetic effort, whether military or activist or
moderate rebels,
to ultimately overthrow a government or it to
drive that into reality. But the social media
played a central role. Maybe we're seeing the
switch of this, where now we have the
whatever's on the backside of it, whether it's
people or government or military, but we have
the technocratic social media sort of
front part of this.
Whatever that ultimately resembles being sort of the
lead, and ultimately, it's the other way around.
Like, I I I'm just I'm just kind
of hypo hypothesizing here. But at the end
of the day, this is an obvious conversation
about how this could've been an organized effort
to essentially take control of this country under
the guise of
some kind of technocratic start up. I mean,
you could see this happening with a company.
Don't forget, like, Pfizer and and COVID 19
illusion. Remember all the contracts they had? They
literally forced these governments to put their military
assets and their g d their their gov
their country's assets on the line for the
contract. And should they have challenged that, they
were gonna lose their government assets.
I just think that's wild. That is this
new direction. So let me see you'll you'll
see as we go through this.
So setting up what they claim was a
libertarian charter city, founded by Sam Altman, Mark
Anderson, and Peter Thiel.
It was called Prospera,
and they're suing Honduras
for $11,000,000,000.
The GDP of the entire country is $32,000,000,000.
And, apparently, they're expected to win according to
the New York Times. That will collapse this
country. Do you think that's good for the
people of Honduras?
Wild. Now remember,
Derek wrote about Sam Altman in in 2023.
Artificial intelligence, the Bilderberg Group, and Worldcoin.
This was the the whole thing they're trying
to get you to scan your irises to
give you free bit cryptocurrency. Remember that? Funny
how relevant that seems to become right now.
They're this is not some
passing thing for some nuance. This is very
important. Your biometric data, as I've said so
many times, and it's only gonna become more
alarming more alarmingly accurate as we go forward,
I don't even think we fully understand what
this is going to mean 10, 20 years
from now.
Digital twins and the way this all works.
I mean, seriously.
Even then, right? Well, I'm picture. I don't
even think we can grasp what this will
be used for. Why they're so surreptitiously trying
to gather this information. Could just be controlled
surveillance, but frankly, I think it's more than
that.
But going on, it says basically, the libertarian
charter city, or a start up named Prospera,
made a deal with the corrupt, oppressive,
post coup government in Honduras.
So who do you think was
driving the coup? Right? The reality is that
we're already dealing with some western regime change
destabilization
tactics. So this could have been a test
bed
for some new effort.
Now they used this post coup government in
Honduras to get special economic status.
The status was the result of court packing
and is wildly unpopular.
A democratic government is trying to undo the
deal. This is what he's framing it as
anyway. Take this all with a grain of
salt. The point is essentially that they manipulated
the judicial system to add more judges to
make sure they got what they wanted, which
by the way is what they're all doing.
Israel is in a I mean, this game
they play where they've got an independent judiciary
has been self evidently not the case for
years.
And it's been called out. They did they
did it's what one of the biggest issues
they have with Netanyahu is that he's trying
to do this to make sure he doesn't
go to jail. Over here, your government's going,
we don't need to investigate ICC. They've got
an independent they don't. Their own people call
that out. The point, though, is that they
do the same thing with the way they
manipulate the juju judicial system for their own
benefit.
But in this case, we're dealing with another
country, so they're court packing.
But they're dealing with a government that was
likely put in place in order to get
the special status that they gained in order
to get themselves in this position. To me,
that seems very very set up.
But it says in 2021, the United Nations
expressed strong concern over Honduran
zedes.
Zedes, I guess.
Stated that they posed a potential threat to
human rights in Honduras.
The UN estimated that ZDIs could wind up
controlling approximately
35%
of the country's territory.
That same year, Honduran corruption watchdog published a
scathing report on ZDIs, it's a political entity,
highlighting the opportunity at least, it's front facing,
highlighting the opportunity they provide for corrupt actors
to engage in money laundering and other illegal
activities.
So we're we'd literally be talking about some
kind of so I mean, realize with Ukraine
on being very scrutinized,
we'll watch the quantum money laundering hub that
they've been using it for. Certainly possible they
needed a new location that wasn't so on
display.
Just I'm just spitballing. But nonetheless,
we have to recognize how obvious the US
government and its real manipulation we can see
in these locations And whether this was something
that was put into place
in order to justify
a new location for this and this whole
technocratic angle of it could be a new
effort.
Yeah. Saying, you know,
very unpopular political entity, but somehow has most
control is the main point.
But it goes on to say in response,
Prospera is suing the government
for 2 thirds of its annual state budget.
Right? So it says zedis are highly unpopular
in Honduras. The slogan, no disease, featured prominently
in Castro's electoral campaign. Shortly after the inauguration,
the Honduran congress voted to appeal the law
that allowed for certain the creation of zedis.
A broad based national movement against the disease
and defense of sovereignty, which was formed under
the prior government that includes unions, indigenous groups,
human rights organizations, prominent academics, and also pressing
Castro to shut down Zeti's down. The point
is you can see, like I said, that's
clearly the momentum, the actual democratic support of
what they want is not what is actually
happening.
But in April 2022, a few months after
his inauguration, the new Honduras congress
made up an array of parties on the
right and left voted unanimously to repeal the
city law. But Prospera,
this foreign entity,
boasting strong and legal stability protections
protected by international treaty for a minimum of
50 years, was prepared for this eventuality.
So they needed this to maintain what they
were doing. In December 2022, Prospera announced that
it was seeking attribution
Arbitration, excuse me, at the International Center For
Settlement and Investment Disputes. For a sum of
nearly $10,000,000,000.
10.8.
Here we are right back where we're just
talking about the forced arbitration based on contracts.
In the absence of any sizable investment, Prospera's
case was hedging its bets on the loss
of future profits.
So they're suing the government for almost $11,000,000,000.
An op ed foreign policy states the suit's
success would simply render the country bankrupt.
The longer story appear appears to be
2009, military coup, results in corrupt and oppressive
post coup government. 2011,
the government decrees
special employment and economic development zones called zedis.
2012,
Honduras constitutional court finds decree unlawful, so Honduran
congress,
swaps out judges for pro zedi judges. 2013,
new court rules in favor of Zeedi's 2017,
Prospera Zeedi grant official status.
So, you know, it took over a process
of years, but you can see how this
being manipulated gets to a point to where
you can then just get, like I mean,
the idea that you can ever be in
a position where you're granting special step like,
this is like the United States government giving
a part of a conch a state to
a some new start up. Like, they're making
this their own little area.
Like, just this is not what any government
seems like they would ever allow, so this
seems like a very clear manipulation using regime
change tactics.
November 2021, center left government led by Honduras'
first female president
takes power. April 2022, new government votes unanimously
to repeal the city law.
That's where, essentially, we're currently at. It says,
in a few months
after the inauguration, 2022
Oh, wait. That's the part we just read
a second ago. Now it says, in December
2022, Prospera announced that it was seeking arbitration
at the International Center For Settlements, which we
read.
At the end,
it says its affiliates filed an astronomical 10.775,000,000,000
lawsuit
against the state in a World Bank tribunal
called, as we breast ref referenced the
settlement of an an investment disputes. Prospera is
thought to have a good chance of prevailing
in par. For I don't even know how
in the world this makes sense that you
could have
like, who
exactly
it just doesn't make logical sense to me.
Like, you I mean, we're in this I
guess it's different depending on what western versus
these entities that have been cooed and destabilized.
But imagine trying to sue the United States
government for a third of its GDP.
It just seems like a fantastical thing that
doesn't even make sense in their in based
on what's actually going on and what they're
actually doing. Since Prospera is incorporated in Delaware
and has received support from the US ambassador
to Honduras and the state department. Surprise, surprise.
Despite Biden's stated opposition to these kinds of
investment state arbitrations.
So not only is it the arbitration conversation,
but this is backed by the US state
department. And I wanna be clear. In no
way is this about, I mean, my opinion,
that it's Biden versus Trump.
I I think this is a clear
government manipulation using and, look, again, to be
clear, we're talking about Peter Thiel project, which
guarantee is gonna be supported by the Trump
administration that's happening next.
But it says this guy says, I've never
heard of the ICSID.
My opinion is that's just a a basically,
a a arbitrary
arbitration
setup settlement system for these kind of high
level government manipulations, I would guess. It's my
opinion. But it sounds like he says a
thought experiment drummed up by leftists trying to
show the absolute worst side of capitalism. How
funny is that? He could be right. He
literally could be right. This is about setting
up the idea to make it look like
this doesn't work. But let's be real.
Just as many examples ex ex the idea
that capitalism works and socialism doesn't or vice
versa. Guys, these are political games that are
being used to keep you blind to the
bigger picture.
Every single type of government can very clearly
and usually does end up collecting power at
the top.
So it's funny that court he clearly leans
one direction, and he's simply highlighting this as
it could be. This is about the democrats
or anybody on the left trying to create
a situation that makes it look like capitalism's
work in order to drive you into socialism.
But I just I I think either way,
either narrative that doesn't make sense to me.
That this would be the other side of
it. They try to convince you know, the
the same dynamic in the other way would
be them trying to convince you that democracy
works and capitalism doesn't.
I don't think they care. I think it's
about getting you in a position where you
are under their control.
Government does that.
And historically, you can look around and see.
I mean, look at like I keep saying,
look at where we are in this country.
It's obvious. And I don't think and it's
embarrassing to pretend that Kamal or anybody else
is even remotely socialism or communist. It's not
the case. But it just works for narratives.
And I'm not saying I support it. I
don't support any government. Let alone socialism or
or communism. But it says, this is what
they the new presidents had to say about
the special economic zones.
Every millimeter, he says, of our homeland that
was usurped
in the name of the sacrosanct freedom of
the market zedis and other regimes of privilege
was,
irrigated with the blood of our native peoples.
Now you could make that about free markets,
but let's start with pretend that we even
have that in this country. We're always being
played by these narratives. The bottom line is
using
these kind of manipulations,
using government manipulations in order to take control
from a government that you want to take
for or even just as an individual, you
could talk about companies doing this. But the
bottom line is you're taking from Honduras
for your benefit under the guise that they
somehow have circumvented your contract. But at the
end of the day, what they're doing is
what the people want.
I mean, again, you could argue that's not
the case. But let's just take it for
sake of conversation. That does appear to be
the reality.
At what point so so now we're at
the point where you can say that your
contract supersedes democracy?
Yes. This is the direction they're going in.
This is the technocratic
idea. They know better. Right? They're the tech
they're the tech the the idea of technocracy
is the the scientists and the engineers and
the, you know, the original concept are smarter
than the politicians, which frankly I agree with.
But that's not what it has is today.
We're talking about these these elitists that just
try to push during COVID 19. We're seeing
the same thing in foreign policy, trying to
take control of your lives.
He says Prospera is funded by
Pronomus Capital, which is advised, among others, by,
Balaji
s
Srinivasan,
a former partner at Anderson Harrowitz, we've talked
about, who wants to partner with police to
take over San Francisco. Some people might call
this impulse fascistic.
But realize, we're talking about seeing people that
are working alongside Peter Thiel, and the rest
that are funding this current administration on the
right.
He says, so Silicon Valley billionaires, and this
is what Whitney's been pointing out, are backing
a project that is trying to bankrupt the
poor country for reneging on a deal struck
with people who have been indicted on corruption,
drug trafficking, weapons charges. The groups that that's
what the, US state departments are supporting
because they're easily manipulated. That's how they work
with all these people. The moderate rebels, the
Saudis, the I mean, people that are, I
mean, or the Israel funding Hamas.
And so they they are working with the
very elements they use to make their case
for how they need to exist.
Right? That's that's the point we've always made.
They're funding the most radical elements of what
they claim they're fighting. Because the people that
aren't
are not willing to bend over and let
them take what they want.
So they go with the people that are
radical, and then they claim the radicals are
there, and that's why we have to fight.
It's it's all manip it's manipulation.
He's saying these same billionaires wanna build a
superhuman AI ASAP. You're right.
And it largely seems to be on the
right more than anything right now. And that's,
again, that's not a left right point. They're
just they're using that paradigm to get you
get goo goo stepping, sleepwalking right in to
that direction.
He says, and are vigorously resisting regulation of
such technology. If you'd like to see how
they've governed a the the world with a
superintelligent AI, it might be instructive to see
how they act now. California's AI safety bill
was a mask off moment for the industry.
Totally, he's got a left. It you know,
that's the problem. But the reality is this
is not if you actually look at the
people behind this, they're all backing Trump's administration.
He says, my good friend, Ian MacDowell, has
a fantastic story on pro, Prospera with Isabel
Simpson and the rest of the world a
few years back. The roots of this story
can be found here. You can read more
if you want. I find it to be
a fascinating story.
Bottom line again,
pretending to be a libertarian charter city, Sam
Altman, Mark Anderson, Peter Thiel,
creating an entity that essentially is circumventing what
the people want in the country for their
benefit, suing them based on that, and working
with a illegitimate Ku Ga entity in the
first place,
working alongside the US government, they mean these
are the realities
of what's actually happening.
And as Stella Bell points out, it's actually
not libertarian. It's techno fascism.
Exactly.
That's the point.
Now, overall, I'm in the interest of time,
unfortunately, I'm gonna have to break off here.
I was gonna and I'm I'm gonna get
into this like I keep saying into the
next discussion. What I was gonna go over
to end here was the point. This is
gonna take more time than I I wanna
make sure we go through this in-depth. Ben
Swan put up a great post about Brazil.
And the overarching point is simply that we're
seeing the same thing.
Right? We're watching Elon Musk as a technocratic
oligarch billionaire
government contractor
abuse this power in all sorts of fields.
Now that's not in remotely to say that
Brazil is acting correct.
That Brazil is censoring. Brazil is doing the
same things. So that both those things can
exist in the same conversation. Now Elon Musk
is centering himself or setting himself up to
be the counterbalance to that, but he's doing
the same things.
Just because they're they're only at odds in
the sense that in this moment, the, his
interest in what he's doing with x and
Twitter in in Brazil is against what what
he's wants in the ground. I mean, even
even consider for the moment that maybe Elon
is doing something that makes that person actually
have just cause to make sure he's not.
I don't know.
I I again, what Brazil's doing in regard
to censorship is wrong.
But it's amazing that just that alone, that
point can make people assume that Elon and
I mean, isn't it possible that he's using
that situation to benefit himself?
I mean, again, you have to recognize that
he's being subjective. Brazil was only one aspect
of a larger dynamic. There's plenty of other
countries that he's acquiesced and censored.
They're just not talking about it.
I think that's
important. But we'll address this in the next
show as well as the Telegram honeypot point
that I wanted to come back to. And
here's the email that Rumble put out. Free
speech under attack. A note from the CEO
of Rumble. And he basically goes on to
say, you know, Brazil, they're censoring.
He goes, Rumble is no longer available to
Brazil, joining the ranks of France, Russia, and
China. Now, words I forget, by the way,
this is not to say that they should
be doing this. But let's remember that
Russia and China and the rest have removed
a lot of these platforms because it's und
it's undeniably that undeniable that these platforms are
being used by US intelligence.
We all should know that by now. It's
not even a secret.
So they could be doing it for that
reason, but also because they just wanna censor.
Both those things can exist. But they have
a logical reason to be concerned about that,
like the removal of NED and and USAID.
Excuse me. Because they know
what they're being used for. Regime change, infiltration,
destabilization.
Right? That's not to say that they should
be able to censor, but the point is
that there's an obvious point there.
And the same point when you see how
these things might be working, it's interesting to
think about. But it says Brazil no longer
allow has Elon Musk
Twitter due to attacks by free speech, but
it says the world powers don't want rumble.
See how they love to frame themselves as
the war they don't want Twitter. They don't
want Telegram. They don't want truth social.
Ah, you went too far right there. The
point is, clearly, it's about their leaning direction.
True social and not even in any way
remotely is on the same page. Yeah. Even
as Telegram and Rumble and the rest. But
they included it because it's about Trump and
the election and politics. That's the point, which
make should make you give you pause,
which by the way in general is why
what we're doing is so important. Here's the
tweet we put out.
Derek put this out on the 27th
August, announcing the Independent Media Alliance.
Which at the with what's going on right
now with the Tenet Media Point and all
of this, I mean, you know, look, I
I I recommend that you express skepticism and
caution. But don't blindly assume.
Watch what's happening, listen to this, be skeptical,
dive through this, and you'll see for yourself
if you care enough to look that this
will be
radically transparent.
And in fact, it's really, at this point,
nothing more than a loose overlapping of other
people that we think fit this bill for
objective
and and honest work.
Panels, interviews.
But we are working on some kind of
background idea. We're currently talking with different entities
in the background. We'll show you in a
second. One of them is odyssey about potentially
building something for, like, just for use. No
funding overlap. Nothing like that. It's just about
trying to work with other people in the
same mindset to reach real free speech and
real information flow.
The point is I think this is very
important right now, especially with what's going on.
Now, I was gonna get into one other
point that I thought was really interesting about
a person named Murray Rothbard, but I'm gonna
give it that next show.
And end with a couple points about Israel
since we're gonna bring it up.
Well, actually,
just these points here.
In general,
recognizing as Whitney's going back and forth with
RFK Junior,
they're really just calling him out.
As he calls out Candace Owens
for discussing
a rabbi
named
mentioned
Sherson.
RFK Junior is going out of his way
to say you're wrong and you're in fact
racist for saying this person is a is
a supremacist.
Well, the problem is that he is, and
you can listen to him in his own
words. He's open to what he discusses. It's
very clear. And Whitney calls him out for
this. Saying he is absolutely a supremacist in
his own words. In his own words. And
it was other prominent Shabbat rabbis have long
been pro occupation, pro greater Israel and calling
for brutality towards civilians in Israel or Palestine.
And just says that, you know, you're exposing
yourself by doing this or he doesn't know
any better.
There's that same video. Now, at the end
of the day, here is Arnab Patrand highlighting
another very, you know, somebody who knows what
he's talking about, a Harvard professor, Steven Waltz
saying, Palestinian resistance is completely legitimate. Because international
law explicitly says that populations under co occupation
have a right to resist. You know this.
We'll go through it. Here's a new article
from Moretz. It's not Hamas that's collapsing,
but it's real.
The rest the world sees this. For some
reason, a very select entities within the United
States or western countries are either choosing not
to or just can't see this. The truth
is obvious right now.
There will be a reckoning.
B'Tselem,
the leading Israeli human rights group of the
world, says point blank, the Israeli government places
no value on human life. Realize they didn't
specify.
Just simply no that means Israelis and Jews
and everything else. It says whether it's of
Gaza subjects or its own citizens.
Wow.
It says Israel's killing the gaz the hostages
in Gaza 1 by 1. That's the Israeli
human rights group.
The world sees it.
Oxfam highlights this is a recent one. This
is from oh, I'm sorry. This is July
18th.
Pretty sure I had a newer one. In
any case, the point doesn't matter. The point
is war crimes.
Using water
to hurt people. Using water, using rape as
a web as a tool of war, using
starvation as a tool of war, using everything
they have to make these people suffer.
I'll include this thread that goes over what
they've been doing
to Palestinians
long before October 7th.
Lastly, here's WikiLeaks. Target Israel and we will
target you.
ICC prosecutor says world leaders threatened him over
Israel arrest warrants.
We need to see the big picture here,
guys.
All of your potential candidates in the lesser
of evil solution are all blindly supporting the
group that is clearly committing genocide that the
world can see.
It's time to have some some constitution here.
Right? Some some integrity.
We need to stand by what we know
is right and stop falling into the traps
they present for us.
Very important, guys.
Thank you for tuning in today. I think
this stuff needs to reach. I mean, it
is reaching more of you. I I know
it every day. I could see it.
Have the courage
to stay the course.
The wisdom to see the right path and
the courage to stay the course, guys. It's
right there in front of us.
Don't fall for these petty games.
It's just so simple, and I know we
see it. I know we feel it.
I know it's comfortable. It's easy to fall
in with the people you think. I mean,
because largely people in those group, you already
kinda generally think that, you know, even though
you see some of these things that, well,
they're more like me than this. It's all
manipulation. The the bottom line is it doesn't
matter what the group is doing.
Follow your heart. Do what you know to
be right. That will not lead you wrong.
Thank you for being here. And if if
if you're out there and you believe what
we're doing, and you believe in what we're
building, we're fighting for, there's never been a
more important time to support the last American
bag of bond. Now on that note, I
will include,
let's do this.
I wanna make sure you guys see
the location here.
So if you're if you're now, basically, I
don't I didn't say I haven't brought this
up, but we're the the the truth clothing
store is is about to shut down apparently.
Just be it's their own it's personal dynamic
for them. They're gonna be moving on. And
we're gonna be shifting over to the,
big frog location.
So if you'd like to support this platform
in general, right on our homepage, you see
lots of different ways. Bitcoin, Litecoin, you you
know, Ethereum. Really, we'll take anything out there.
If you were interested in sending us crypto,
reach out to me. We can set something
up. But the point is you're a subscribe
star, Cash App,
different subscribe. But here's the t love apparel,
truth clothing, big frog.
So right now we've got some some cool
shirts on here if you wanna buy these.
That does support our platform. Our truth our
free speech absolutist shirt,
or are they shirt the hierarchy enslaving you?
But, mhmm, the until these actually sell out,
we still have truth clothing. What we're gonna
be setting up is basically the same shirts
on the new store, so you guys can
have that as well. But all the question
everything shirts, all these different stickers and everything,
all that supports our platform. But in general
as well, just reaching out and send donating
through our donation portal,
Through any of the platforms you're watching on
right now, our our our subscribes to our
our I mean, our, give send go platform,
which we're I'm gonna pro probably do another
kind of fundraising thing here soon. There'll be
another place we can continue to do that.
But the bottom line is, guys, we definitely
need your support.
Because I mean, I've talked about it here
and there and I'm Honestly, I just hate
getting into it. But I've just had a
meeting with my lawyer today about what we're
gonna be doing with these lawsuits. I mean,
it's just it's not gonna go away. And
we're gonna have to put a ridiculous amount
to be able to push these people back
to maintain what we're doing. And it may
amount to something that we, you know, with
regard to the LLC going. I mean, I
it's not gonna ever stop what I'm doing.
Regardless of whether they pretend that they've brought
the LLC is just a thing on a
piece of paper as far as I'm concerned.
This is what t lab is.
I'm gonna keep doing that. But the bottom
line is that this end it could end
up affecting
the
reality of TLav as a company and what
the I don't know what that could look
like. I mean, people could literally pretend that
they're TLav. You know what I mean? Like,
the point is that I'm gonna fight it
with everything I have. But if you're out
there and you've got the means to support
us in regard to fighting back against this
and I don't mean necessarily I mean, what
you know, whatever that means to you, reach
out to you. We we are in need
of your support. But the most important thing
as always, no matter what,
is engaging with the content,
asking these questions, sharing the content with your
friends and family and people you wanna move
forward, having these conversations, sharing the information. That's
what matters to me more than anything.
I'd rather you take the time to read
this and care about it than sending anything.
But But if you wanna do that too,
then obviously we could use the help. So
thank you for being here.
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.